Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
03-10-2025 CC Agenda Packet
Agenda City Council Meeting Monday, March 10, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 12780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 /oronomn.gov Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Approval of Agenda Consent Agenda These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion with no discussion unless a council member or staff requests and the item will be removed from the consent agenda for separate discussion and action. 1. City Council Minutes 2. Claims/Bills 3. Upcoming Work Session Schedule 4. Council Code of Conduct 5. Election Judges and Absentee Ballot Board - Resolution 7572 6. Hire Communications Specialist 7. Construction of Communications Specialist Office Space 8. Park Commission Appointments - Resolution 7571 9. Planning Commission Appointments - Resolution 7570 10. Annual Performance Review of the City Administrator 11. Carman Bay LID Insurance Agreement Termination 12. North Water Plant Fiber Connection 13. Purchase Equipment - Stump Grinder Attachment 14. LA24-000056, 4375 Bayside Road, Final Plat "BOBWHITE MEADOWS" - Resolution 7558 15. LA24-000065, 980 Heritage Lane, Conditional Use Permit - Resolution 7561 16. LA25-000008, 2475 Kelley Parkway, Final Master Development Plan - 5th Extension - Resolution 7569 17. LA24-000070, 2195 Watertown Road, Easement Vacation - Resolution 7563 18. LA24-000067, 2691 Ethel Avenue, Variance - Resolution 7562 19. LA25-000004, 3545 Ivy Place, Average Lakeshore Setback Variance - Resolution 7567 Public Comments This is an opportunity for the public to address the City Council. The council will not engage in discussion or take action on items presented at this time. However, the council may refer issues to staff for follow up or consideration at a future meeting. Speakers should state their name and home address at the podium before speaking. The council will first open the podium to city of Orono residents before opening the podium to any member of the public wishing to address the council. Finance Report 20. Utility Rate Study Proposal Community Development Report 21. LA24-000059, 215 North Arm Lane, Preliminary Plat: "Idyllvale Shores" - Resolution 7559 22. LA25-000003, 155 Wear Lane North, Variance - Resolution 7566 Sign up for email notifications at oronomn.gov 23. LA25-000005, 1480 Bohns Point Rd, Variance - Resolution 7568 24. LA24-000066, 430 East Long Lake Road, Conditional Use Permit & Variances 25. LA24-000063, City of Orono, Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Resolution 7560 26. LA25-000001, 485 Orono Orchard Road South, Preliminary Plat: "Sky Blue Waters" & Termination of Covenant - Resolution 7564 Attorney Report City Administrator/Engineer Report 27. Agreement for Standby Public Works Service to Minnetonka Beach Committee Reports 28. Council Committee and Board Reports Mayor/Council Reports Adjournment Upcoming Events Mar 04 Candidate Filing Open Mar 10 City Council Mar 10 Eyewear service @ Gillespie Center Mar 11 Foot care @ Gillespie Center Mar 17 Planning Commission Mar 18 Candidate Filing Close Mar 19 Presentation - Estate Planning @ Gillespie Center Mar 28 Voting Opens Apr 08 Foot care @ Gillespie Center Apr 14 Eyewear service @ Gillespie Center Apr 14 City Council Apr 19 Clean Up Day Apr 21 Planning Commission Apr 28 City Council Sign up for email notifications at oronomn.gov K AGENDA ITEM Date: March 10, 2025 Title: City Council Minutes Presenter: Christine Lusian, City Clerk Section: Consent Agenda Purpose: The purpose of this item is to approve the City Council meeting minutes. 2. Staff Recommendation: Approve the City Council work session and regular meeting minutes. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Approve the City Council work session and regular meeting minutes of February 24, 2025. Exhibits A. 02-24-2025 CC Minutes - work session B. 02-24-2025 CC Minutes Item: 1 3 Minutes City Council Work Session Monday, February 24, 2025, 5:00 PM City Council Chambers 12780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 ROLL CALL City Council members present: Mayor Bob Tunheim, City Council Members Alisa Benson, Claire Berrett, Steve Persian, Jacqueline Ricks. Staff present: City Administrator Adam Edwards, Community Development Director Laura Oakden, Parks and Facilities Superintendent Joe Ruthenberg. COMMISSION INTERVIEWS Oakden and Ruthenberg introduced the commission interview process and schedule. Council members interviewed six candidates (four for park commission and two for planning commission): Janie Delaney, Mollie Reynolds, Kim Carswell, Jacob Selseth, Sam Tift, and Shane Weltzin. Members directed to staff to bring a resolution of appointment to the next council meeting for consideration. ADJOURNMENT Work session ended at 5:55 p.m. ATTEST: CITY COUNCIL Christine Lusian, City Clerk Bob Tunheim, Mayor 4 Minutes City Council Regular Meeting Monday, February 24, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Mayor Tunheim called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Orono City Council members present: Mayor Bob Tunheim, City Council Members Alisa Benson, Steve Persian, Jacqueline Ricks and Claire Berrett. Members absent: None Staff present were City Attorney Soren Mattick and City Administrator/Engineer Adam Edwards. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved by consensus. CONSENT AGENDA 1. City Council Minutes 2. Claims/Bills 3. Upcoming Work Session Schedule This item was removed from the consent agenda 4. 2024 Fund Transfers 5. Resignation and Recruitment — Public Works Maintenance Worker 6. Rehabilitation of Lift Stations 4 and 27 7. Street Improvements Brown Road N. (25-002) Award This item was removed from the consent agenda 8. Engagement of Legal Defense Services This item was removed from the consent agenda 9. Seasonal Weight Restrictions — Resolution 7557 10. Purchase Office Furniture This item was removed from the consent agenda II. Appoint Seasonal Employee 2025 Benson moved, Ricks seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda with items 3, 7, 8 and 10 removed. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PUBLIC COMMENTS Ritche Anderson, 3205 Bristol Bay Road; Jim Tyson, 1295 Elwood Ave.; and Kendall Nygard, 1386 Rest Point Road and Florida provided comments. Upcoming Work Session Schedule Benson asked for a future work session topic on how RFPs for service contracts such as engineering firms are solicited. Persian asked to have a future work session topic on fire service coverage in terms of what departments are serving different parts of Orono and does it make sense for response time. Page 1 of 4 Minutes City Council Regular Meeting Monday, February 24, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 The Council discussed the item and asked questions of staff. Ricks moved, Benson seconded, to adopt the work session schedule through June as amended. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 7. Street Improvements Brown Road N. (25-002) Award Ricks asked about the $43,000 line item in the award for having a construction oversight and why that is necessary. The Council discussed the item and asked questions of staff. Ricks moved, Persian seconded, to award the bid for the street improvement project on South Brown Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 8. Engagement of Legal Defense Services Berrett asked if this was a firm the City had used before. City Attorney Mattick said no, but that this is a firm that has expertise with election issues. The case is not covered by the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Fund. A judge has been assigned and a quick timeline set for hearing the case. The Council discussed the item and asked questions of staff. Ricks moved, Benson seconded, to approve the engagement of legal defense services. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 10. Purchase Office Furniture Berrett said the new communications employee needs appropriate furniture but the cost seems high and she suggested the City look at alternatives such as gently used items. Benson noted that council has not typically needed to weigh in on operational purchases like office furniture in the past and staff is tasked with taking care of matters like this. The Council discussed the item and asked questions of staff. Persian moved, Ricks seconded, to approve the purchase of office furniture. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ATTORNEY REPORT Mattick provided his report during Item 8. CITY ADMINISTRATOR/ENGINEER REPORT Page 2 of 4 6 Minutes City Council Regular Meeting Monday, February 24, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 12. Council Code of Conduct The City Council is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and adopt a Code of Conduct and Statement of Values. The Council discussed the item and asked questions of staff. Benson noted the code needs to be a living document and be reviewed regularly. Berrett moved, Benson seconded, to revise the Code to add that language and bring it back to the Council. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. City Administrator Edwards updated the Council on discussions between the City Administrators of Orono and Long Lake. The Council discussed the appropriate time for a public forum on the matter of the Orono Fire Department. Mayor Tunheim allowed additional public comments. Kelly Prchal, 4705 Watertown Road; and Kelly Grady, Long Lake, provided comments. Edwards reported he has also been in discussion with the City of Minnetonka Beach concerning backup public works support for their one employee. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS None MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Mayor and Council provided reports. CLOSED SESSION 13. Annual Performance Review of the City Administrator Benson moved, Ricks seconded, to enter into closed session at 7:25 p.m. to discuss a process for the Annual Performance Review of the City Administrator. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (The City Council was in closed session from 7:27 p.m. to 7:42 p.m.) ADJOURNMENT Benson moved, Persian seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 7:43 p.m. to Monday, March 10, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Page 3 of 4 7 Minutes City Council Regular Meeting Monday, February 24, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 ATTEST: Christine Lusian, City Clerk Bob Tunheim, Mayor Minutes approved by Orono City Council March 10, 2025. Meeting videos and transcripts available at oronomn.gov. Page 4 of 4 AGENDA ITEM Date: March 10, 2025 Title: Claims/Bills Presenter: Kellie Hoen, Administrative Assistant Section: Consent Agenda Item: 2 Purpose: The purpose of this action item is to approve payment of claims made on the City for services and/or products provided to the City. 2. Background: The attached claims for payment have been received by the City. Staff has reviewed the claims and is recommending approval of the listing for payment. The claims will be paid by checks 125503 to 125591, and ACH transactions 20130632 to 20130639 totaling $461,748.01 . 3. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of a motion authorizing payment to the claims listed as presented. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the claims list as presented. Exhibits A. Check Register 2025-03-06 9 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 2/25/2025 - 3/10/2025 Check Check Invoice Invoice GLAccount Description Payee Issue Date Number Number ANDREA NELSON 03/10/2025 125503 LA24-000060 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - LA24-000060 - 755 TONKAW Total 125503: AURORA ASPHALT & CONCRET 03/10/2025 125504 ROW23-000 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - ROW23-000053-3577 LIVING Total 125504: AWWA 03/10/2025 125505 S0215391 601-49400-433 05/25-4/26 MEMBERSHIP D.GOMAN Total 125505: BIFFS INC 03/10/2025 125506 INV236503 101-45200415 BIFF RENTAL-LURTON PARK Total 125506: CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 03/10/2025 125507 02.2025 101-42260-381 GAS SERVICE 1/21/25-2/19/25 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 03/10/2025 125507 02.2025 101-42110-381 GAS SERVICE 1/21/25-2/19/25 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 03/10/2025 125507 02.2025 613-49830-381 GAS SERVICE 1/21/25-2/19/25 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 03/10/2025 125507 02.2025 101-41900-381 GAS SERVICE 1/21/25-2/19/25 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 03/10/2025 125507 02.2025 601-49400-381 GAS SERVICE 1/21/25-2/19/25 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 03/10/2025 125507 02.2025 602-49450-381 GAS SERVICE 1/21/25-2/19/25 Total 125507: CENTRAL PENSION FUND SOU 03/10/2025 125508 03.06.25 FU 101-21705 CENTRAL PENSION FUND 03.06.2025 Total 125508: CENTURY LINK 03/10/2025 125509 R0W24-000 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - ROW24-000045 - 3005 CAS Total 125509: Department Water Parks Fire Protection Services Police Department Golf Course Central Services Water Sewer CENTURYLINK 03/10/2025 125510 02.2025 GC 613-49830-321 GC PHONE/INTERNET 02/19/2025-03/18/2025 Golf Course Total 125510: Christopher and/or Anne Policinsk 03/10/2025 125511 UB REFUND 999-10015 UB REFUND - 450 OLD LONG LAKE RD - POLICI Page: 1 Mar 06, 2025 08:28AM Invoice Amount 700.00 1,144.33 781.94 4,542.73 2,134.42 2,219.79 2,240.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 211.51 211.51 20.64 10 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 2 Check Issue Dates: 2/25/2025 - 3/10/2025 Mar 06, 2025 08:28AM Check Check Invoice Invoice GLAccount Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 125511: 20.64 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 03/10/2025 125512 24742 601-49400-489 BACTERIAL WATER TESTING Water 42.00 Total 125512: 42.00 City of Orono Utilities 03/10/2025 125513 02.2025 UB 101-41900-382 02.2025 CH Central Services 82.58 City of Orono Utilities 03/10/2025 125513 02.2025 UB 101-42110-382 02.2025 PD Police Department 82.58 City of Orono Utilities 03/10/2025 125513 02.2025 UB 101-42260-382 02.2025 NORTH TEMP FIRE Fire Protection Services 148.64 City of Orono Utilities 03/10/2025 125513 02.2025 UB 101-41900-382 02.2025 PO Central Services 89.53 City of Orono Utilities 03/10/2025 125513 02.2025 UB 101-41900-382 02.2025 PW Central Services 114.95 City of Orono Utilities 03/10/2025 125513 02.2025 UB 601-49400-382 02.2025 PW Water 114.95 City of Orono Utilities 03/10/2025 125513 02.2025 UB 602-49450-382 02.2025 PW Sewer 114.95 City of Orono Utilities 03/10/2025 125513 02.2025 UB 651-49910-382 02.2025 PW Storm Water 114.95 City of Orono Utilities 03/10/2025 125513 02.2025 UB 601-49400-382 02.2025 UB WTP Water 162.74 Total 125513: 1,025.87 CITY OF WAYZATA 03/10/2025 125514 02.2025 UTIL 602-49450-387 FEBRUARY 2025 SEWER Sewer 4,423.30 CITY OF WAYZATA 03/10/2025 125514 02.2025 UTIL 601-49400-387 FEBRUARY 2025 WATER Water 2,166.08 Total 125514: 6,589.38 CIVICPLUS LLC 03/10/2025 125515 329361 614-49840-329 CITY CODE SUPPLEMENT UPDATE Cable Franchise 440.00 CIVICPLUS LLC 03/10/2025 125515 329565 614-49840-329 CITY CODE SUPPLEMENT UPDATE Cable Franchise 23.91 CIVICPLUS LLC 03/10/2025 125515 329576 614-49840-329 CITY CODE UPDATE - ZONING Cable Franchise 563.81 Total 125515: 1,027.72 COREY OLSON 03/10/2025 125516 LA24-000058 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - LA24-000058 - 975 WILDHU 700.00 Total 125516: 700.00 CUTA, JOSEPH 03/10/2025 125517 03.2025 CDL 101-43000-331 REIMBERSTMENT FOR MILEAGE TO CLASS Public Works Department 301.00 Total 125517: 301.00 DVS RENEWAL 03/10/2025 125518 UNIT 256 RE 701-49800441 256 TABS Fleet Services 30.75 DVS RENEWAL 03/10/2025 125518 UNIT 257 RE 701-49800441 247 TABS Fleet Services 30.75 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 3 Check Issue Dates: 2/25/2025 - 3/10/2025 Mar 06, 2025 08:28AM Check Check Invoice Invoice GLAccount Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount DVS RENEWAL 03/10/2025 125518 UNIT 843 RE 701-49800441 843 TABS Fleet Services 15.25 Total 125518: 76.75 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC 03/10/2025 125519 0138759-IN 101-43000-224 BUMP SIGNS FOR STREETS Public Works Department 251.95 Total 125519: 251.95 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 03/10/2025 125520 1036319 603-49500-352 RECYCLING REMINDER Recycling 175.00 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 03/10/2025 125520 1036320 603-49500-352 RECYCLING REMINDER Recycling 273.40 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 03/10/2025 125520 1036728 613-49830-340 GOLF COURSE ADVERTISING Golf Course 328.00 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 03/10/2025 125520 1037075 101-41410-352 ORDINANCE NOTICE - SPECIAL ELECTION TIMI Elections 44.10 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 03/10/2025 125520 1037076 101-41410-352 NOTICE OF ELECTION Elections 37.80 Total 125520: 858.30 ELECTRICAL PRODUCTION SE 03/10/2025 125521 ROW22-000 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - ROW22-000071-2700 KELLE 1,500.00 Total 125521: 1,500.00 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 03/10/2025 125522 1-10211971 701-49800-222 PD PARTS Fleet Services 97.68 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 03/10/2025 125522 1-10212148 701-49800-222 PD PARTS Fleet Services 217.80 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 03/10/2025 125522 1-10485207 701-49800-215 VEHICLE FILTERS Fleet Services 234.25 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 03/10/2025 125522 1-10494974 701-49800-222 PD PARTS Fleet Services 1,082.12 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 03/10/2025 125522 1-10516374 701-49800-222 PD PARTS Fleet Services 167.10 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 03/10/2025 125522 1-10516946 701-49800-221 PARKS MOWERS FILTERS Fleet Services 175.97 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 03/10/2025 125522 128-197245 701-49800-222 PD PARTS Fleet Services 165.84 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 03/10/2025 125522 128-Z16602 701-49800-222 VEHICLE PARTS Fleet Services 16.00- FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 03/10/2025 125522 128-Z16694 701-49800-222 VEHICLE PARTS Fleet Services 16.00- FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 03/10/2025 125522 1-R11331 701-49800-222 VEHICLE PARTS Fleet Services 165.84 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 03/10/2025 125522 6-1691652 701-49800-222 PD PARTS Fleet Services 288.29 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 03/10/2025 125522 70-561658 701-49800-222 VEHICLE PARTS Fleet Services 16.00- FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 03/10/2025 125522 70-562540 701-49800-222 VEHICLE PARTS Fleet Services 164.99 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 03/10/2025 125522 70-564407 701-49800-222 VEHICLE PARTS BATTERY CORE Fleet Services 577.28- FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 03/10/2025 125522 70-565240 701-49800-222 VEHICLE PARTS Fleet Services 179.20- FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 03/10/2025 125522 70-565990 701-49800-222 L-1 FILTER Fleet Services 57.22 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 03/10/2025 125522 70-566005 701-49800-222 VEHICLE PARTS Fleet Services 124.80- FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 03/10/2025 125522 70-567186 701-49800-222 VEHICLE PARTS Fleet Services 165.83- FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 03/10/2025 125522 70-568148 701-49800-222 VEHICLE PARTS Fleet Services 161.41- FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 03/10/2025 125522 70-579106 701-49800-222 PD PARTS (259) - ENGINE REPLACEMENT Fleet Services 5,425.00 12 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 4 Check Issue Dates: 2/25/2025 - 3/10/2025 Mar 06, 2025 08:28AM Check Check Invoice Invoice GLAccount Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 03/10/2025 125522 70-579461 701-49800-222 VEHICLE PARTS Fleet Services 137.86- FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 03/10/2025 125522 70-582668 701-49800-213 BRAKE CLEANER Fleet Services 185.76 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 03/10/2025 125522 70-582722 701-49800-222 FIRE 505 FILTERS Fleet Services 36.37 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 03/10/2025 125522 70-582955 701-49800-222 PD PARTS Fleet Services 272.58 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 03/10/2025 125522 70-583481 701-49800-222 HEATER HOSE Fleet Services 99.33 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 03/10/2025 125522 70-583481 701-49800-221 HEATER HOSE Fleet Services 99.32 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 03/10/2025 125522 70-583716 701-49800-222 PD PARTS Fleet Services 57.22 Total 125522: FAUL PSYCHOLOGICAL 03/10/2025 Total 125523: FERGUSON WATERWORKS #25 03/10/2025 Total 125524: G&H Distributing & Supply Inc 03/10/2025 Total 125525: GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 03/10/2025 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 03/10/2025 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 03/10/2025 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 03/10/2025 Total 125526 GOPHER ACE 03/10/2025 GOPHER ACE 03/10/2025 GOPHER ACE 03/10/2025 GOPHER ACE 03/10/2025 GOPHER ACE 03/10/2025 GOPHER ACE 03/10/2025 GOPHER ACE 03/10/2025 GOPHER ACE 03/10/2025 GOPHER ACE 03/10/2025 GOPHER ACE 03/10/2025 125523 2327 101-42260-319 PSYCH TESTING FOR SMITH 125524 0543003 601-49400-437 FERGUSON WATER ACADEMY TRAINING 125525 00184344 701-49800-222 MRAP PARTS 125526 618198 701-49800-222 FIRE 505 FILTERS 125526 618231 701-49800-222 POLICE TAHOE PARTS 125526 618523 651-49910-222 PARTABLE PRESSURE WSHER PARTS 125526 618747 701-49800-222 VEHICLE PARTS Fire Protection Services Water Fleet Services Fleet Services Fleet Services Storm Water Fleet Services 7,598.30 665.00 665.00 240.00 240.00 57.96 140.05 2.53 48.01 38.87 125527 023828/1 701-49800-222 E-1 S.S. CABINET BOLTS Fleet Services 6.88 125527 023874/1 101-43000-224 FITTINGS FOR HOTSEY CULVERT JETTER Public Works Department 4.99 125527 023876/1 701-49800-221 HOTSY FUEL LINE Fleet Services 23.88 125527 023942/1 701-49800-222 L-1 NUTS AND BOLTS Fleet Services 3.48 125527 023946/1 101-41900-223 BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES Central Services 18.29 125527 023959/1 701-49800-222 L-1 NUTS AND BOLTS Fleet Services 4.70 125527 23866/1 101-43000-224 FITTINGS FOR HOTSY CULVERT JETTING HOSE Public Works Department .74 125527 23925/1 101-41900-223 BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES Central Services 5.19 125527 23948/1 101-41900-223 BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES Central Services 11.18 125527 23966/1 101-42260-215 NUTS AND BOLTS FOR FIXING THE HANGING R Fire Protection Services 14.75 13 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 5 Check Issue Dates: 2/25/2025 - 3/10/2025 Mar 06, 2025 08:28AM Check Check Invoice Invoice GLAccount Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total125527: 94.08 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 03/10/2025 125528 5020664 602-49450-406 LOCATES - SEWER Sewer 54.68 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 03/10/2025 125528 5020664 601-49400-405 LOCATES - WATER Water 54.67 Total 125528: 109.35 H & L MESABI 03/10/2025 125529 14473 101-43000-222 PLOW CUTTING EDGES Public Works Department 5,191.00 Total 125529: 5,191.00 HECKSEL MACHINE INC 03/10/2025 125530 112311 701-49800-222 FIRE TRUCK PARTS Fleet Services 25.00 Total 125530: 25.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNT 03/10/2025 125531 1000242207 101-41600-309 JAIL CHARGES/ALL CITIES Law/Legal Services 1,231.20 Total 125531: 1,231.20 HENNEPIN COUNTY CHIEFS OF 03/10/2025 125532 023125-OrP 101-42110-433 2025 HENNEPIN CHIEFS Police Department 420.00 Total 125532: 420.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASUR 03/10/2025 125533 02.13.2025-S 101-41900-301 AUDIT REQUEST FEE Central Services 25.00 Total 125533: 25.00 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLIE 03/10/2025 125534 1279697 101-42260437 FIREFIGHTER TRAINING FOR WILSON Fire Protection Services 2,200.00 Total 125534: 2,200.00 HENTGES, ANNE 03/10/2025 125535 02.2025 Exp 101-41500437 MILEAGE 02.2025 - EHLERS TRAINING Finance Department 31.50 Total 125535: 31.50 HOLIDAY COMPANIES 03/10/2025 125536 0796010325 101-42110-402 CAR WASHES / HOLIDAY Police Department 258.50 Total 125536: 258.50 14 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 2/25/2025 - 3/10/2025 Page: 6 Mar 06, 2025 08:28AM Check Check Invoice Invoice GLAccount Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount HOLTON ELECTRIC CONTRACT 03/10/2025 125537 7802 601-49400405 SOUTH WATER PLANT VFD REPLACEMENT Water 13,180.00 Total 125537: 13,180.00 HOTSY MINNESOTA 03/10/2025 125538 24304 101-42260-215 CAR WASH SOAP Fire Protection Services 679.78 HOTSY MINNESOTA 03/10/2025 125538 24305 701-49800-215 TRUCK WASH SOAP Fleet Services 373.05 Total 125538: 1,052.83 INDEPENDANT PET PARTNERS 03/10/2025 125539 PS-INV1040 101-42110-317 K9 FOOD Police Department 83.84 Total 125539: 83.84 INTOXIMETERS INC 03/10/2025 125540 780853 101-42110-403 PBT REPAIR Police Department 126.95 Total 125540: 126.95 Jefferson Fire & Safety 03/10/2025 125541 IN323749 415-42260-580 ICE RESCURE SUITS AND PICKS FOR E2 Fire Capital 1,732.61 Total 125541: 1,732.61 KELLY WINGER 03/10/2025 125542 RAS25-0000 101-34410 BP REFUND - RAS25-000005 - 1290 BRIAR ST -W 70.41 Total 125542: 70.41 KODIAK POWER SOLUTIONS 03/10/2025 125543 19237822 602-49450406 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE Sewer 1,341.73 Total 125543: 1,341.73 LANO EQUIPMENT INC 03/10/2025 125544 02-1137117 405-48500-580 MINI LOADER Imp Eqpt Outlay 93,415.30 LANO EQUIPMENT INC 03/10/2025 125544 02-1137118 405-48500-580 ATTACHMENTS FOR MINI LOADER Imp Eqpt Outlay 9,316.00 LANO EQUIPMENT INC 03/10/2025 125544 03-1136980 701-49800-221 TOOLCAT LIFT ARMS Fleet Services 5,163.83 Total 125544: 107,895.13 LEANN SATHER 03/10/2025 125545 RPS23-0000 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - RPS23-0000170 - 800 NORT 10,000.00 Total 125545: 10,000.00 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT LLC 03/10/2025 125546 P12207 701-49800-222 FIRE 507 PARTS Fleet Services 346.61 15 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 2/25/2025 - 3/10/2025 Page: 7 Mar 06, 2025 08:28AM Check Check Invoice Invoice GLAccount Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT LLC 03/10/2025 125546 P12235 701-49800-222 LADDER TRUCK PARTS Fleet Services 279.48 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT LLC 03/10/2025 125546 P12256 701-49800-222 FIRE TRUCK PARTS Fleet Services 744.62 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT LLC 03/10/2025 125546 P12261 701-49800-222 LADDER TRUCK FILTERS Fleet Services 1,049.66 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT LLC 03/10/2025 125546 P12276 701-49800-222 L-1 PARTS Fleet Services 226.53 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT LLC 03/10/2025 125546 P44240 101-42260-240 HYDRANTADAPTERS Fire Protection Services 1,343.06 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT LLC 03/10/2025 125546 P44401 101-42260-240 RETURN OF INCORRECT ADAPTERS Fire Protection Services 856.95- MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT LLC 03/10/2025 125546 P44559 415-42260-580 TURNOUT GEAR FOR DOUG Fire Capital 4,199.59 Total 125546: 7,332.60 METRO CITIES 03/10/2025 125547 2107 101-41110-433 2025 MEMBERSHIP Mayor & Council 3,692.00 Total 125547: 3,692.00 METRO SALES INC. 03/10/2025 125548 INV2716927 710-49970-401 COPIER REPAIR IT Services 170.00 Total 125548: 170.00 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVI 03/10/2025 125549 0001184801 602-49450-383 WASTWATER SERVICE 4/2025 Sewer 60,575.15 Total 125549: 60,575.15 MGX EQUIPMENT SERVICES LL 03/10/2025 125550 PS0087241- 701-49800-221 AIR COMPRESSOR PARTS Fleet Services 982.09 Total 125550: 982.09 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPA 03/10/2025 125551 0000140639 701-49800-215 ACETYLENE, OXYGEN Fleet Services 73.41 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPA 03/10/2025 125551 0000140640 101-42110-221 MEDICAL OXYGEN/TANK FEE Police Department 144.72 Total 125551: 218.13 MINNESOTA CIT 03/10/2025 125552 000336 101-42110-437 TRAINING - CIT - SZCZEPANIK Police Department 100.00 Total 125552: 100.00 MINT ROOFING INC 03/10/2025 125553 8083 101-41900-223 PD ROOF REPAIR Central Services 135.00 Total 125553: 135.00 MITCH & ADRIENNE KRAUTKRA 03/10/2025 125554 RPS23-0000 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - RPS23-000023 - 800 LAKEVI 10,000.00 16 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 2/25/2025 - 3/10/2025 Page: 8 Mar 06, 2025 08:28AM Check Check Invoice Invoice GLAccount Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 125554: 10,000.00 MN - LEAP 03/10/2025 125555 2025108 101-42110-437 TRAINING - RUSSETH/MCGREGOR/RASMUSSE Police Department 150.00 Total 125555: 150.00 MN CHIEF OF POLICE ASSN 03/10/2025 125556 21343 101-42110-437 ETI REGISTRATION 2025 - SILTALA, WITTKE AND Police Department 1,495.00 Total 125556: 1,495.00 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 03/10/2025 125557 2025 1ST QT 601-20802 2025-1ST QTR WATER TEST FEE 2,867.40 Total 125557: 2,867.40 MOCIC 03/10/2025 125558 MOCIC MEM 101-42110-433 INVESTIGATION MEMBERSHIP MOCIC Police Department 50.00 Total 125558: 50.00 NAVARRE HARDWARE 03/10/2025 125559 349253 602-49450-227 POINT OF SALE SUPPLIES Sewer 10.58 Total 125559: 10.58 Newegg Business Inc 03/10/2025 125560 1305332308 710-49970-221 SPARE KEYBOARDS AND MICE IT Services 46.06 Newegg Business Inc 03/10/2025 125560 1305378647 710-49970-221 MONITORS - COMMUNICATIONS IT Services 359.98 Newegg Business Inc 03/10/2025 125560 1305379149 710-49970-575 LAPTOP - COMMUNICATIONS IT Services 780.99 Total 125560: 1,187.03 NOVA TECHNOLOGIES 03/10/2025 125561 IN-80009186 710-49970-329 MONTHLY PHONE SIP CHARGE 3/25 IT Services 229.16 Total 125561: 229.16 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LL 03/10/2025 125562 4071069550 101-42110-201 OFFICE SUPPLIES Police Department 61.19 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LL 03/10/2025 125562 4086295790 101-42110-201 OFFICE SUPPLIES Police Department 75.39 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LL 03/10/2025 125562 4137519270 101-42110-201 OFFICE SUPPLIES Police Department 30.99 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LL 03/10/2025 125562 4137520870 101-42110-201 OFFICE SUPPLIES Police Department 38.13 Total 125562: 205.70 17 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 2/25/2025 - 3/10/2025 Page: 9 Mar 06, 2025 08:28AM Check Check Invoice Invoice GLAccount Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount PETERSON, DAWN 03/10/2025 125563 02.2025 - PE 234-34781 DOG PARK PASS REFUND 45.00 Total 125563: 45.00 PRECISION UTILITIES 03/10/2025 125564 1817 601-49400-405 WATERMAIN BREAK AT 3745 SHORELINE DR Water 19,922.50 Total 125564: 19,922.50 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC 03/10/2025 125565 48426 601-49400405 VFD SET UP Water 701.50 Total125565: 701.50 REPUBLIC SERVICES #894 03/10/2025 125566 0894-007055 101-41900404 TRASH SERVICE 02/01/25-02/28/25 - CITY HALL Central Services 488.25 REPUBLIC SERVICES #894 03/10/2025 125566 0894-007055 613-49830404 TRASH SERVICE TRASH SERVICE 02/01/25-02/2 Golf Course 560.22 REPUBLIC SERVICES #894 03/10/2025 125566 0894-007055 101-45200404 TRASH SERVICE 02/01/25-02/28/25 - LURTON PA Parks 231.00 REPUBLIC SERVICES #894 03/10/2025 125566 0894-007055 101-41900404 TRASH SERVICE 02/01/25-02/28/25 - POLICE DE Central Services 302.32 Total 125566: 1,581.79 RICK THRASHER 03/10/2025 125567 UB REFUND 999-10015 UB REFUND - 356 WESTLAKE ST.- THRASHER 96.36 Total 125567: 96.36 Riverside Design 03/10/2025 125568 4666 101-42110-352 OFFICE SUPPLIES/GENARIC OPD BUSINESS CA Police Department 120.63 Total 125568: 120.63 RYAN AUTO MALL 03/10/2025 125569 273662 701-49800-222 PD 267 PARTS Fleet Services 1,094.66 Total 125569: 1,094.66 SECURITY & SOUND CO 03/10/2025 125570 29420 710-49970-401 PW COMPUTER SERVICE CALL IT Services 180.00 Total 125570: 180.00 SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL 03/10/2025 125571 ARV/639883 701-49800-240 MECHANICS TOOLS Fleet Services 2,006.70 Total 125571: 2,006.70 STREICHER'S 03/10/2025 125572 11746602 101-42110-226 UNIFORMS/LANGE Police Department 99.99 18 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 10 Check Issue Dates: 2/25/2025 - 3/10/2025 Mar 06, 2025 08:28AM Check Check Invoice Invoice GLAccount Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount STREICHER'S 03/10/2025 125572 11746603 101-42110-226 UNIFORMS/WIEBUSCH Police Department 14.99 STREICHER'S 03/10/2025 125572 11746605 101-42110-226 UNIFORMS/SHERMAN Police Department 14.99 STREICHER'S 03/10/2025 125572 11746607 101-42110-226 UNIFORMS/MCCOY Police Department 35.00 STREICHER'S 03/10/2025 125572 11746610 101-42110-226 UNIFORMS/SCHULTZ Police Department 17.99 STREICHER'S 03/10/2025 125572 11746663 101-42110-226 UNIFORMS/SONNEK Police Department 186.00 STREICHER'S 03/10/2025 125572 11748107 101-42110-226 UNIFORMS/WHITE Police Department 12.99 Total 125572: 381.95 STREICHER'S 03/10/2025 125573 11748883 101-42260-226 POLO AND DRESS COAT FOR JACKSON Fire Protection Services 124.99 STREICHER'S 03/10/2025 125573 11748884 101-42260-226 DRESS UNIFORM FOR WILSON Fire Protection Services 229.99 STREICHER'S 03/10/2025 125573 11748887 101-42260-226 NAME PLATES FOR JACKETS Fire Protection Services 119.90 Total 125573: 474.88 SUPERIOR TURF SERVICES 03/10/2025 125574 6465 613-49830-223 GOLF COURSE FERTILIZER Golf Course 1,230.61 Total 125574: 1,230.61 T W TUPY INC 03/10/2025 125575 38508 601-49400-227 ROCK FOR WATER MAIN BREAKS Water 1,927.64 Total 125575: 1,927.64 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 03/10/2025 125576 10422-00 701-49800-215 SHOP SUPPLIES HYDRAULIC FITTINGS Fleet Services 111.67 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 03/10/2025 125576 11859-00 701-49800-215 SHOP EQUIPMENT Fleet Services 1,443.83 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 03/10/2025 125576 94874-01 701-49800-215 SHOP SUPPLIES Fleet Services 211.87 Total 125576: 1,767.37 THOMAS HEIMEL 03/10/2025 125577 ROW24-000 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - ROW24-000044 - 2155 SHEV 1,500.00 THOMAS HEIMEL 03/10/2025 125577 ROW24-000 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - ROW24-000063 - 1360 FREN 1,500.00 THOMAS HEIMEL 03/10/2025 125577 ROW24-000 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - ROW24-000068 - 975 HERIT 1,500.00 Total 125577: 4,500.00 THOMSON REUTERS - WEST 03/10/2025 125578 851556752 101-42110-311 DATA PROCESSING/THOMSON REUTERS Police Department 318.14 Total 125578: 318.14 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRET 03/10/2025 125579 30035 101-41110-319 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 02/24/2025 Mayor & Council 212.50 19 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 11 Check Issue Dates: 2/25/2025 - 3/10/2025 Mar 06, 2025 08:28AM Check Check Invoice Invoice GLAccount Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRET 03/10/2025 125579 30036 101-42400-319 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 02/18/2025 Building & Zoning 536.50 Total 125579: 749.00 T-MOBILE USA INC 03/10/2025 125580 9594522330 101-42110-311 INVESTIGATIVE EXPENSES/25-379 Total 125580: TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 03/10/2025 125581 0040208756 701-49800-215 OXYGEN ACETYLENE TANKS Total 125581: TONKA BUILT LLC 03/10/2025 125582 3638 Total 125582: TORKE COFFEE COMPANY INC 03/10/2025 125583 0541468 Total 125583: ULTIMATE SAFETY CONCEPTS 03/10/2025 125584 215703 Total 125584: 101-45200-404 BIG ISLAND DOCK PLACEMENT 101-42260-439 COFFEE FOR MEETINGS AND TRAININGS 415-42260-580 AIRPACKS FOR E2 AND U2 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 03/10/2025 125585 1410123668 101-45200-226 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 03/10/2025 125585 1410123668 613-49830-226 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 03/10/2025 125585 1410123668 101-41900-226 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 03/10/2025 125585 1410123668 101-43000-226 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 03/10/2025 125585 1410123668 101-43000-226 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 03/10/2025 125585 1410123668 601-49400-226 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 03/10/2025 125585 1410123668 602-49450-226 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 03/10/2025 125585 1410123668 701-49800-226 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 03/10/2025 125585 1410123668 101-41900-223 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 03/10/2025 125585 1410123668 101-43000404 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 03/10/2025 125585 1410123668 701-49800-221 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 03/10/2025 125585 1410125284 101-41900404 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 03/10/2025 125585 1410125336 613-49830-226 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 03/10/2025 125585 1410125336 101-41900-226 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 03/10/2025 125585 1410125336 101-45200-226 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 03/10/2025 125585 1410125336 101-43000-226 Police Department Fleet Services Parks Fire Protection Services Fire Capital UNIFORMS -PARKS Parks UNIFORMS -GOLF COURSE Golf Course UNIFORMS -FACILITY Central Services UNIFORMS - STORMWATER Public Works Department UNIFORMS -STREETS Public Works Department UNIFORMS PW-WATER DEPT Water UNIFORMS PW-SEWER DEPT Sewer UNIFORMS - FLEET Fleet Services MOPS/CLEANING TOWELS Central Services RUGS-PW Public Works Department SHOP TOWELS - PW Fleet Services RUGS AND CLEANING SUPPLY MAINTENANCE - Central Services UNIFORMS -GOLF COURSE Golf Course UNIFORMS -FACILITY Central Services UNIFORMS -PARKS Parks UNIFORMS - STORMWATER Public Works Department 50.00 50.00 12.32 12.32 4,500.00 4,500.00 170.58 170.58 105,625.97 16.42 16.42 6.56 62.95 62.95 25.15 25.15 40.59 30.52 28.73 3.91 90.36 16.42 6.56 16.42 62.95 20 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 2/25/2025 - 3/10/2025 Page: 12 Mar 06, 2025 08:28AM Check Check Invoice Invoice GLAccount Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount UNIFIRST CORPORATION 03/10/2025 125585 1410125336 101-43000-226 UNIFORMS -STREETS Public Works Department 62.95 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 03/10/2025 125585 1410125336 602-49450-226 UNIFORMS PW-SEWER DEPT Sewer 25.15 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 03/10/2025 125585 1410125336 601-49400-226 UNIFORMS PW-WATER DEPT Water 25.15 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 03/10/2025 125585 1410125336 701-49800-226 UNIFORMS - FLEET Fleet Services 40.59 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 03/10/2025 125585 1410125336 101-41900-223 MOPS/CLEANING TOWELS Central Services 30.52 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 03/10/2025 125585 1410125336 101-43000-404 RUGS-PW Public Works Department 28.73 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 03/10/2025 125585 1410125336 701-49800-221 SHOP TOWELS - PW Fleet Services 3.91 Total 125585: 729.06 Verizon Wireless Services LLC 03/10/2025 125586 9022387873 101-42110-311 INVESTIGATIONS DATA DUMP/25-379 Police Department 75.00 Total 125586: 75.00 WASTE MANAGEMENT 03/10/2025 125587 0122116-280 603-49500444 ORGANICS FEB 2025 Recycling 180.56 WASTE MANAGEMENT 03/10/2025 125587 0122116-280 603-49500-316 RECYCLING MAR 2025 Recycling 20,282.30 Total 125587: 20,462.86 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE 03/10/2025 125588 959367 701-49800-222 PD DTF VEHICLE TIRES Fleet Services 244.55 Total 125588: 244.55 ZACK'S, INC. 03/10/2025 125589 37144 101-43000-222 CITRUS CLEANER Public Works Department 357.65 Total 125589: 357.65 ZAHL-PETROLEUM MAINTENA 03/10/2025 125590 0216198 701-49800403 OIL DISPENSER SYSTEM Fleet Services 1,008.50 Total 125590: 1,008.50 ZAYO GROUP LLC 03/10/2025 125591 31304706 602-49450-321 PHONE SERVICE 02/23/25-03/22/25 Sewer 129.82 ZAYO GROUP LLC 03/10/2025 125591 31304706 101-42110-321 PHONE SERVICE 02/23/25-03/22/25 Police Department 130.25 ZAYO GROUP LLC 03/10/2025 125591 31304706 601-49400-321 PHONE SERVICE 02/23/25-03/22/25 Water 132.28 ZAYO GROUP LLC 03/10/2025 125591 31304706 101-41900-321 PHONE SERVICE 02/23/25-03/22/25 Central Services 259.69 ZAYO GROUP LLC 03/10/2025 125591 31304706 613-49830-321 PHONE SERVICE 02/23/25-03/22/25 Golf Course 17.24 Total 125591: 669.28 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 11R3-C4TD- 415-42260-580 WATER RESCUE HELMET FOR E2 Fire Capital 162.82 21 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 2/25/2025 - 3/10/2025 Page: 13 Mar 06, 2025 08:28AM Check Check Invoice Invoice GLAccount Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 11R3-C4TD- 101-42260-223 CLEANING SUPPLIES Fire Protection Services 29.95 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 11 R3-C4TD- 415-42260-580 WATER RESCUE HELMET FOR E2 Fire Capital 153.72 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 11 R3-C4TD- 101-42260-240 SNOW AND ICE BRUSH FOR SQUADS Fire Protection Services 19.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 11 R3-C4TD- 101-42260-221 PAPER TOWELS Fire Protection Services 22.86 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 11 R3-C4TD- 415-42260-580 LED TACTICAL HELMET LIGHTS FOR E2 Fire Capital 55.90 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 11 R3-C4TD- 101-42260-223 SINK CADDY FOR BREAK ROOM Fire Protection Services 9.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 11 R3-C4TD- 101-42260-221 PAPER TOWEL HOLDER FOR BREAK ROOM Fire Protection Services 6.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 11 R3-C4TD- 415-42260-580 LG CARABINER FOR RESCUE ROPE FOR E2 Fire Capital 29.69 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 11 R3-C4TD- 415-42260-580 CARABINER FOR RESCUE ROPE FOR E2 Fire Capital 104.12 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 11 R3-C4TD- 710-49970-221 HDMI FOR USBC CABLE IT Services 12.79 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 11R3-C4TD- 101-42260-221 KLEENEX Fire Protection Services 15.75 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 11R3-C4TD- 101-42260-223 MOP HEAD REPLACEMENTS Fire Protection Services 31.95 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 11R3-C4TD- 101-42260-219 FOAM INSERTS FOR PELICAN CASE Fire Protection Services 39.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 11R3-C4TD- 101-42260-223 GLASS CLEANER Fire Protection Services 36.48 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 11R3-C4TD- 101-42260-223 LG WATER FILTER REPLACEMENT Fire Protection Services 43.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 11R3-C4TD- 101-42260-219 PELICAN CASE FOR MED SUPPLIES Fire Protection Services 28.95 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 11R3-C4TD- 101-42260-201 SHARPIES BLACK Fire Protection Services 8.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 11R3-C4TD- 101-42260-221 TIDE PODS Fire Protection Services 27.24 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 11 R3-C4TD- 101-42260-221 BOUNCE DRYER SHEETS Fire Protection Services 8.24 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 11R3-C4TD- 101-42260-223 GLASS CLEANER Fire Protection Services 3.48 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 11R3-C4TD- 101-42260-221 CLOTHES HANGERS FOR UNIFORM ITEMS Fire Protection Services 14.94 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 11R3-C4TD- 101-42260-221 METAL HANGERS FOR UNIFORMS ITEMS Fire Protection Services 30.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 11 R3-C4TD- 101-42260-223 LG AIR FILTER REPLACEMENT Fire Protection Services 22.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 11R3-C4TD- 101-42260-223 CLEANING SUPPLIES FOR FLOOR Fire Protection Services 52.22 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 11R3-C4TD- 101-42260-223 DISCOUNT AND PROMOTION Fire Protection Services 18.30- AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 19T9-6VPQ- 101-42110-240 FARADAY BAGS/INVESTIGATIVE SUPPLIES Police Department 191.17 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 1 DHK-DF49- 101-43000-222 CAR CHARGERS FOR PHONES Public Works Department 53.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 1 HCX-YPCM 101-41900-201 OFFICE SUPPLIES -SIGN HOLDER Central Services 19.79 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 1 HM1-KT7Q- 710-49970-221 PODIUM FOR COUNCIL CHAMBER IT Services 480.87 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 1HM1-KT7Q- 101-43000-222 PHONE HOLDERS FOR STREETS TRUCKS Public Works Department 131.22 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 1HM1-KT7Q- 701-49800-215 SHOP SUPPLIES Fleet Services 62.22 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 1HM1-KT7Q- 701-49800-221 EQUIPMENT PARTS Fleet Services 47.43 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130632 1Q77-DG64- 101-41900-201 3 HOLE PUNCH Central Services 14.05 Total 20130632: 1,957.42 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 601-49400433 CEAM MEMBERSHIP Water 50.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 602-49450437 CEAM CONFERENCE Sewer 225.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 601-49400437 CEAM CONFERENCE Water 225.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 602-49450433 CEAM MEMBERSHIP Sewer 50.00 22 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 2/25/2025 - 3/10/2025 Page: 14 Mar 06, 2025 08:28AM Check Check Invoice Invoice GLAccount Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-42110-437 TRAINING/STURM Police Department 130.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-42110-311 TRI COUNTY YEARLY INVESTIGATIVE CONNECT Police Department 90.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-42110-201 OFFICE SUPPLY Police Department 37.52 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-42110-240 PBT REPAIR Police Department 15.96 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 701-49800-222 VEHICLE PARTS Fleet Services 789.24 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 701-49800-221 FUEL CUBE PUMP Fleet Services 171.72 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 701-49800-402 259 EXHAUST MANIFOLD RESURFACING Fleet Services 154.50 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 701-49800-437 DOT INSPECTOR CLASS Fleet Services 245.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 651-49910-222 VAC TRUCK BODY FITTING Storm Water 30.59 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-43000433 AMAON PRIME Public Works Department 349.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 601-49400437 CLINT CLASS WATER SCHOOL Water 585.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 601-49400437 CLINT CLASS WATER SCHOOL AND CERTS Water 109.62 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-42110433 MONTHLY MEMBERSHIP Police Department 47.76 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-41300489 NEW EMPLOYEE BREAKFAST - PD ABBY Administration 47.61 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-41900-201 OFFICE SUPPLY LITERATURE HOLDERS Central Services 41.78 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-41300437 ADMIN/CLERK FOUNDATIONAL TRAINING ONLIN Administration 55.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-41300489 NEW EMPLOYEE BREAKFAST - PD ABBY Administration 89.84 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-41300-489 NEW EMPLOYEE BREAKFAST - PW LANCEMAS Administration 55.46 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-41300-489 NEW EMPLOYEE BREAKFAST - PW LANCE Administration 69.65 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-41110-439 CITY COUNCIL MEALS 01/27/2025 Mayor & Council 174.78 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-41300489 NEW EMPLOYEE BREAKFAST - PW HEATHER Administration 62.13 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-41430-340 JOB POSTING/MEMBERSHIP - COMMUNICATION Communications 85.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-41300489 NEW EMPLOYEE BREAKFAST - PW HEATHER Administration 69.65 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-41430-340 JOB POSTING - COMMUNICATION SPECIALIST Communications 34.58 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-41110439 CITY COUNCIL MEALS 02/10/2025 Mayor & Council 143.48 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-41430-325 GRAPHIC DESIGN PLATFORM ANNUAL FEE Communications 119.99 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 601-49400-322 UPS SHIPPING WATER SAMPLES Water 34.71 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-42260437 PREPAREDNESS PRACTICUM EM Fire Protection Services 90.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-42260437 OFFICERS CONFERENCE CA Fire Protection Services 681.70 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-42260-437 OFFICERS CONFERENCE SC Fire Protection Services 676.50 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-42260-437 OFFICERS CONFERENCE CA Fire Protection Services 52.68 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-42260-228 BOUNDTREE CPR MANIKINS Fire Protection Services 569.99 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-42260-439 PIZZA FOR EMS VARIANCE NIGHT Fire Protection Services 110.75 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 613-49830-201 INK AND PAPER FOR SNOWBALL EVENT Golf Course 121.35 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 613-49830-340 SUPPLIES FOR GAMES AT EVENT Golf Course 36.52 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 613-49830-340 MEETING AT SNOWBALL OPEN - MEAL Golf Course 69.69 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-42400439 PLANNING COMMISSION FOOD 2/18/2025 Building & Zoning 70.92 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-42400437 BUILDING OFFICIAL TRAININGS Building & Zoning 1,745.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 710-49970-311 ZOOM SUBSCRIPTION IT Services 15.99 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-41500433 MNGFOA MEMBERSHIP - HENTGES Finance Department 70.00 23 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 2/25/2025 - 3/10/2025 Page: 15 Mar 06, 2025 08:28AM Check Check Invoice Invoice GLAccount Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-41500437 EHLERS TRAINING SEMINAR Finance Department 100.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 601-49400-319 BACKGROUND CHECK - KRAEMER Water 46.84 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 602-49450-319 BACKGROUND CHECK - KRAEMER Sewer 46.83 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 101-41900-201 ENVELOPES Central Services 247.75 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 613-49830441 PESTICIDE LICENSE Golf Course 15.33 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/10/2025 20130633 02.2025 CAR 613-49830433 GOLF COURSE SUPERINTENDENT MEMBERSHI Golf Course 180.00 Total 20130633: 9.337.41 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC 03/10/2025 20130634 4014685 101-45200-223 PARK SUPPLIES Parks 78.87 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC 03/10/2025 20130634 5313150 101-43000-224 HAND TOOLS FOR STREETS Public Works Department 446.58 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC 03/10/2025 20130634 6015841 101-41900-223 BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES Central Services 385.56 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC 03/10/2025 20130634 9013834 101-41900-223 BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES Central Services 173.02 Total 20130634: 1,084.03 MEDSURETY LLC 03/10/2025 20130635 39216 101-41900-319 MARCH 2O25 FEES Central Services 220.00 MEDSURETY LLC 03/10/2025 20130635 MSFA FUND 101-21719 MFSA 1.17.25-2.23.25 FUNDS 24.99 Total 20130635: 244.99 PSN: PAYMENT SERVICE INVOI 03/10/2025 20130636 307490 101-41900-312 MISC PSN FEES 02.25 Central Services 2.20 PSN: PAYMENT SERVICE INVOI 03/10/2025 20130636 307982 602-49450-312 SEWER FUND PSN FEES 02.25 Sewer 269.46 PSN: PAYMENT SERVICE INVOI 03/10/2025 20130636 307982 651-49910-312 STORMWATER PSN FEES 02.25 Storm Water 269.46 PSN: PAYMENT SERVICE INVOI 03/10/2025 20130636 307982 601-49400-312 WATER FUND PSN FEES 02.25 Water 269.48 PSN: PAYMENT SERVICE INVOI 03/10/2025 20130636 308202 101-41900-312 BUILDING PERMIT PSN FEES 02.25 Central Services 6.60 Total 20130636: SQUARE SERVICES 03/10/2025 20130637 03.2025 613-49830-312 GC SQUARE FEE 03/01/25-04/01/25 Golf Course Total 20130637: STREET FLEET EXPEDITED LL 03/10/2025 20130638 02.19.2025 701-49800-222 STREET FLEET EXPEDITED LL 03/10/2025 20130638 570699 602-49450-222 STREET FLEET EXPEDITED LL 03/10/2025 20130638 571849 701-49800-222 Total 20130638: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVI 03/10/2025 20130639 02.2025 UB 651-49910-322 PARTS DELIVERY CREDIT Fleet Services VAC TRUCK PRESSURE WASHER HOSE FITTIN Sewer PARTS DELIVERY SERVICES Fleet Services 02.2025 UB POSTAGE Storm Water 817.20 35.00 35.00 152.54- 48.47 107.30 3.23 370.53 24 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 16 Check Issue Dates: 2/25/2025 - 3/10/2025 Mar 06, 2025 08:28AM Check Check Invoice Invoice GLAccount Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVI 03/10/2025 20130639 02.2025 UB 601-49400-322 02.2025 UB POSTAGE Water 370.53 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVI 03/10/2025 20130639 02.2025 UB 602-49450-322 02.2025 UB POSTAGE Sewer 370.53 Total 20130639: 1.111.59 Grand Totals: 461,748.01 25 AGENDA ITEM Date: March 10, 2025 Title: Upcoming Work Session Schedule Presenter: Adam Edwards, City Administrator / Engineer Section: Consent Agenda Purpose: The purpose of the action item is to forecast future work session agendas. Item: 3 2. Background: This is an opportunity for council members to propose and agree to future work session topics. Work session meetings are at 5 pm on the same days as 6 pm regular council meetings. The table below lists upcoming proposed subjects and dates. 2025 Date Subject Date 13 Jan 14 Jul Council Code of Conduct 27 Jan Special Elections 28 Jul General Fund Budget Update Council Goals 10 Feb Council Code of Conduct (Part 2) 11 Aug 24 Feb Interview Commissioner Applicants 25 Aug Enterprise Budget Update (Parks/Planning) 10 Mar Fire Service Coverage Discussion 8 Sep Preliminary Levy / Budget 14 Apr Joint Meeting With Parks Commission 22 Sep 28 Apr Street Maintenance 2026 13 Oct Draft Capital Improvement Plans Average Lakeshore set back (Part 6) 12 May Request for Proposal (RFP) process 27 Oct Draft Capital Improvement Plans summary 27 May y City Goals and Vision Discussion - 10 Nov Comp Plan look ahead 9 Jun Social Media Policy and Procedures 24 Nov Fee Schedule Update 23 Jun Preliminary Budget Guidance 2026 8 Dec None 3. Staff Recommendation: I recommend the next work session occur as scheduled. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Move to approve the draft work session schedule. 26 AGENDA ITEM Date: March 10, 2025 Title: Council Code of Conduct Presenter: Adam Edwards, City Administrator / Engineer Section: Consent Agenda Item: 4 Purpose: The purpose of this item is to review a draft code of conduct and values statement for the Orono City Council. 2. Background: At the January 27 work session the Council provided guidance to prepare a draft code of conduct based on the sample from the Mn Mayor's Handbook, and the example form the city of Red Wing. Further there was an interest in having a values statement based on the example from the MN Mayor's Handbook. Staff prepared drafts for each document for council's review and discussion at the February 10 work session. Based on feedback at that meeting staff prepared the drafts at exhibits A and B. At the February 24 council meeting Council reviewed the documents and directed staff to add - "This code of conduct is intended to be a living document that reflects a shared responsibility for maintaining a professional environment. It will be updated when and if it is deemed necessary." COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Move to adopt the Statement of Values and Code of Conduct. Exhibits A. Orono City Council Code Of Conduct B. Orono City Council Statement of Values 4A Adopted by the Orono City Council on March 10, 2025 City of Orono Policy: City Council and Advisory Boards and Commissions Code of Conduct 1. Purpose. The purpose of this code is to preserve the integrity of local government and to promote public confidence in the actions of the Mayor and City Council and the members of advisory boards and commissions. The City Council of the City of Orono has determined that a code of conduct for its members, as well as the members of the various boards and commissions of the City of Orono, is essential for the public affairs of the city. By eliminating conflicts of interest and providing standards for conduct in city matters, the City Council hopes to promote the faith and confidence of the citizens of Orono in their government and to encourage its citizens to serve on its council and commissions. This code of conduct is intended to be a living document that reflects a shared responsibility for maintaining a professional environment. It will be updated when and if it is deemed necessary. 2. Standards of conduct. Elected officials and City advisory board or commission members shall respect and comply with the law and shall behave in a manner that promotes public confidence in government. In their official capacity, the Mayor and members of the City Council and all appointed board and commission members must be patient, dignified and courteous to each other, members of the public and staff. The City Council, boards and commissions shall require similar conduct from persons appearing before them. No member of the City Council or a city board or commission may knowingly: a. Violate the Open Meeting Law and/or make decisions outside of a public meeting. b. Participate in a matter that affects the person's financial interests, those of an immediate family member or those of a business with which the person is associated, unless the effect on the person or business is no greater than on other members of the same business classification, profession, or occupation. c. Use the person's public position to secure special privileges or exemptions for the person or for others. d. Use the person's public position to solicit personal gifts or favors. e. Use the person's public position for personal gain. f. Except as specifically permitted pursuant to Minn. Stat. 471.895, accept or receive any gift of substance, whether in the form of money, services, loan, travel, entertainment, hospitality, promise, or any other form, under circumstances in which it could be reasonably expected to influence the person, the person's performance of official action, or be intended as a reward for the person's official action. g. Disclose to the public, or use for the person's or another person's personal gain, information that was gained by reason of the person's public position if the information was not public data or was discussed at a closed session of the City Council. h. Disclose information that was received, discussed, or decided in conference with the city's legal counsel that is protected by the attorney -client privilege unless a majority of the City Council has authorized the disclosure. 28 i. Use the City logos for personal or private benefit or modify the logos in any way. j. Hold incompatible offices. No elected person can be an employee of the City. k. Use the person's elected or appointed position to impede the efficiency of the body's decision -making. 1. Encourage or participate in a manner that erodes order and decorum at a meeting. in. Use cell phones or other telecommunication devises to communicate with others during public meetings. n. Represent a personal position as position of the city. Members shall represent positions approved by the City Council to the best of their ability when working with, other government entities or the media. If an individual Council Member's opinion differs from the City position, or a matter agreed upon by the full Council, Members shall explicitly state they do not represent their City Council or the City of Orono, nor will they allow the inference that they do. Except as prohibited by the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 471.87, there is no violation of subdivision 1 b. of this section for a matter that comes before the council, board, or commission if the member of the council, board, or commission publicly discloses the circumstances that would violate these standards and refrains from participating in the discussion and vote on the matter. Nothing herein shall be construed to prohibit a contract with a member of the City Council under the circumstances described under Minn. Stat. § 471.88, if proper statutory procedures are followed. 3. Complaint, hearing. Any council, commission or board member may file a written complaint with the city administrator alleging a violation of the standards of conduct in section. The complaint must contain supporting facts for the allegation. The City Council may hold a hearing after receiving the written complaint or upon the council's own volition. A hearing must be held only if the City Council determines: (1) upon advice of the city attorney, designee, or other attorney appointed by the council, that the factual allegations state a sufficient claim of a violation of these standards or rise to the level of a legally recognized conflict of interest, and (2) that the complaint has been lodged in good faith and not for impermissible purposes such as delay. The City Council's determination must be made within 30 days of the filing of the allegation with the city administrator. If the council determines that there is an adequate justification for holding a hearing, the hearing must be held within 30 days of the City Council's determination. At the hearing, the person accused must have the opportunity to be heard. If, after the hearing, the council finds that a violation of a standard has occurred or does exist, the council may censure the person, refer the matter for criminal prosecution, request an official not to participate in a decision, or remove an appointed member of an advisory board or commission from office. 29 Adopted by Orono City Council on March 10, 2025 Orono City Council Statement of Values Preamble The proper operation of democratic government requires that decision -makers be independent, impartial, and accountable to the people they serve. The City of Orono has adopted this Statement of Values to promote and maintain the highest standards of personal and professional conduct in the city's government. All elected and appointed officials are expected to subscribe to this statement, understand how it applies to their specific responsibilities, and practice its core values in their work. Because we seek public confidence in the city's services and public trust of its decision -makers, our decisions and our work must meet the most demanding ethical standards and demonstrate the highest levels of achievement in following this statement. The values As a representative of the City of Orono, 1. I serve the public interest. 2. I fulfill the duties and responsibilities of holding public office. 3. I am ethical. 4. I am professional. 5. I am fiscally responsible. 6. I am conscientious. 7. I communicate effectively. 8. I am collaborative. 9. I am forward thinking. Value examples/expressions 1. I serve the public interest. In practice, this value means that: a. I provide courteous, equitable, and prompt service to everyone. b. I am attuned to and care about the needs and issues of citizens, public officials, and city workers. c. I am interested, engaged, and responsive in my interactions with constituents. d. I recognize and support the public's right to know the public's business. 2. I fulfill the duties and responsibilities of holding public office. In practice, this value means that: a. I observe the highest standards of integrity in my official acts and undertake my responsibilities for the benefit of the greater public good. b. I faithfully discharge the duties of my office regardless of my personal considerations, recognizing that the public interest is my primary concern. c. I uphold the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the state of Minnesota and carry out impartially the laws of the nation, state, and municipality and thus foster respect for all government. d. I comply with both the letter and the spirit of the laws and policies affecting operations of the city. 30 e. I recognize my obligation to implement the adopted goals and objectives of the city in good faith, regardless of my personal views. f. I conduct myself in both my official and personal actions in a manner that is above reproach. g. I do not use my position to secure for myself or others special privileges or exemptions that are different from those available to the general public. h. I understand and abide by the respective roles and responsibilities of elected and appointed officials and city staff and will not undermine them in their work. i. I am independent, impartial, and fair in my judgment and actions. 3. I am ethical. In practice, this value means that: a. I am trustworthy, acting with the utmost integrity and moral courage. b. I am truthful, do what I say I will do, and am reliable. c. I am accountable for my actions and behavior and accept responsibility for my decisions. d. I make impartial decisions, free of influence from unlawful gifts, narrow political interests, and financial and other personal interests that impair my independence of judgment or action. e. I am fair, distributing benefits and burdens according to consistent and equitable criteria. £ I oppose all forms of harassment and unlawful discrimination. g. I extend equal opportunities and due process to all parties in matters under consideration. h. I show respect for confidences and confidential information. i. I avoid giving the appearance of impropriety and of using my position for personal gain. 4. I am professional. In practice, this value means that: a. I apply my knowledge and expertise to my assigned activities and to the interpersonal relationships that are part of my job in a consistent, confident, competent, and productive manner. b. I approach my job and work -related relationships with a positive attitude, contributing to a supportive, respectful, and non -threatening work environment. c. I keep my professional knowledge and skills current and growing. d. I am respectful of all city staff, officials, volunteers, and others who participate in the city's government. 5. I am fiscally responsible. In practice, this value means that: a. I make decisions after prudent consideration of their financial impact, taking into account the long-term financial needs of the city, especially its financial stability. b. I demonstrate concern for the proper use of city assets, follow established procedures, and do not use public resources for personal gain. c. I make decisions that seek to preserve the financial capacity of the city to provide programs and services for city residents. d. I provide full disclosure of any potential financial or other private conflict of interest. I abstain from participating in the discussion and vote on these matters. e. I prevent misuse of public funds by establishing, maintaining, and following strong fiscal and management controls. f. I report any misuse of public funds of which I am aware. 6. I am conscientious. In practice, this value means that: a. I act in an efficient manner, making decisions and recommendations based upon research and facts, taking into consideration short- and long-term goals. 31 b. I follow through in a responsible way, keeping others informed, and responding in a timely fashion. c. I am respectful of established city processes and guidelines. d. I prioritize my duties so that the work of the city may move forward. e. I prepare for all meetings by reviewing any materials provided ahead of time. When I have materials to contribute, I make sure all others involved have ample time to review these materials prior to the meeting. 7. I communicative effectively. In practice, this value means that: a. I convey the city's care for and commitment to its citizens. b. I communicate in various ways that I am approachable, open-minded, and willing to participate in dialogue. c. I engage in effective two-way communication by listening carefully, asking questions, and responding appropriately, which adds value to conversations. d. I do not interfere with the orderly conduct of meetings by interrupting others or making personal comments not germane to the business at hand. e. I follow up on inquiries in a timely manner. f. I encourage and facilitate citizen involvement in policy decision -making. g. I am respectful in disagreements and contribute constructively to discussions on the issue. 8. I am collaborative. In practice, this value means that: a. I act in a respectful manner with groups, other units of government and other individuals, working together in a spirit of tolerance and understanding to accomplish common goals. b. I share information with others in a timely manner so that, together, we can make informed decisions. c. I work toward consensus building and gain value from diverse opinions. d. I accomplish the goals and responsibilities of my individual position, while respecting my role as a member of a team. 9. I am forward thinking. In practice, this value means that: a. I promote intelligent, proactive, and thoughtful innovation in order to advance the city's policy agenda and provide city services while considering the broader regional, statewide, national, and international implications of the city's decisions and issues. b. I maintain consistent standards, but am also sensitive to the need for compromise, creative problem solving, and making improvements when appropriate. c. I am open to new ideas and processes, adopting them as they conserve resources and provide efficient and effective service. d. I consider the potential long-term consequences and implications of my actions and inactions. Signature: Name: Title: Date: 32 AGENDA ITEM Date: March 10, 2025 Title: Election Judges and Absentee Ballot Board - Resolution 7572 Presenter: Christine Lusian, City Clerk Section: Consent Agenda Item: 5 Purpose: State law requires advance appointment of election judges and the establishment of an absentee ballot board. 2. Background: Election judges will assist voters at the polling places on election day, May 13. The absentee ballot board will work at City Hall accepting and rejecting ballots during the absentee voting period prior to election day, March 28 through May 13. 3. Cost: The hourly pay for an election judge is $15.25, absentee judge $16.25, and head judge $17.25. The expenses for election workers is not a budgeted item for 2025 and an estimated $7,550 will be expended from the general fund. 4. Staff Recommendation: Appoint election judges and establish an absentee ballot board. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt resolution 7572 appointing election judges and establishing an absentee ballot board. Exhibits A. Resolution 7572 Appoint Election Judges 33 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL No. 7572 APPOINT ELECTION JUDGES AND ESTABLISH ABSENTEE BALLOT BOARD WHEREAS, a special election will be held May 13, 2025 for one city council member seat; and WHEREAS, appointment of election judges, prior to the election they will serve, is required by Minn. Stat. §20413.21 Subd. 2; and WHEREAS, establishment of an Absentee Ballot Board is required by Minn. Stat. §203B.121 Subd. l ; and RESOLVED that the Orono City Council appoints the following individuals to serve as election judges: Adrian Wear Holly Sue Rocca Leonard Freeman Sandra Whisler Ainsley Kaufman Janna Sundby Lindsay Freeman Sherry White Bonnie Martinson Jeff Strandberg Mary Tucker Susan Bro Carl Borg Jennifer Weiss Nancy Danielson Susan Heurung Carolyn Strandberg Jill Kunze Penny Saiki Ted Schultze Cathleen Wilkins Joy Grundeen Regina Engebritson Dana Sheehan Julie Ruegemer Richard Rohrer Deborah Houston Kaitlin Thompson Sandie Berger Debra Cornick Kirk Nelson Sandra Keegan FURTHER RESOLVED, the Orono City Council establishes an Absentee Ballot Board with the following individuals: Nola Dickhausen, Cathleen Wilkins, Jennifer Weiss, Kirk Nelson, Sandra Keegan, Sherry White, Rick Rohrer and Susan Bro; and FINALLY RESOLVED, the City Clerk is authorized to appoint additional election judges and absentee ballot board members as needed. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held March 10, 2025. ATTEST CITY OF ORONO Christine Lusian, City Clerk Bob Tunheim, Mayor 34 AGENDA ITEM Date: March 10, 2025 Title: Hire Communications Specialist Presenter: Christine Lusian, City Clerk Section: Consent Agenda Purpose: The purpose of this action item is to approve hiring a Communications Specialist. Item: 6 2. Background: On January 27 council approved a newly created Communications Specialist position and directed staff to execute recruitment. 3. Recruitment: The position was advertised and applications were accepted from January 28 to February 9. A team of leadership and staff reviewed the applications, resumes, and work samples and four candidates were interviewed on February 19 by two four -person panels of leadership and staff. Staff spoke with references, conducted a background investigation, and selected a candidate to fill the position. 4. Recommended Candidate: Staff recommends that Rachel Cotter be appointed to the position of Communications Specialist with a start date of March 13. Rachel holds a bachelor's degree in marketing and is a former officer of the Army National Guard. Her past work experience includes strategic content development, brand strategy execution, data -driven decision making, stakeholder and audience engagement, community relations and feedback integration, and public affairs. Recommended Compensation: a. Salary. Starting wage of $36.20 (Grade 7, Step 6 of the Office and Professional Employees International Union (OPEIU) 12 pay scale). b. Benefits. Vacation accruing at a rate of 10 days per year following the collective bargaining agreement with OPEIU 12. Vacation and sick leave accrual will begin on the start date. Rachel will be eligible to participate in the city's benefit package starting the first day of the month following 30 days of employment and as a full-time employee is eligible for benefits as outlined in the OPEIU 12 agreement and personnel handbook, which includes enrollment in the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA). COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to appoint Rachel Cotter as Communications Specialist with a start date of March 13, 2025. Exhibits A. Communiciations Specialist - Job Description - 2025 35 Position Title: Document Date: Department: Accountable to: FLSA Status: Union Status: Nature of Work CITY OF ORONO Communications Specialist January 27, 2025 Administration City Clerk Non -Exempt Office and Professional Employees International Union, Local No. 12, AFL-CIO This position provides internal and external communication and marketing services and performs a variety of specialized duties such as content creation, social media management, website editing, photography, video production, graphic design, and assisting with community engagement activities. Supervision Received and Exercised This position reports to the City Clerk and does not supervise any other position within the City. Examples of Work Essential functions listed below are intended as illustrations of the various types of work that may be performed. The omission of specific statements of duties does not exclude them if the work is similar, related or a logical assignment to the position. • Collaborates with city departments to plan, develop, and produce messages and methods. • Provides input on and assists city leadership in the development of strategic communication plans and recommendations, editorial calendar, branding and marketing, engagement strategy, and proactively identifies internal and external opportunities and issues. • Coordinates content production that effectively promotes the city of Orono brand. • Assists public safety officers with crisis communications. • Writes, edits, designs and produces public information pieces for external and internal audiences including newsletters, list servs, brochures, handbooks, flyers, maps, signs for print and digital distribution. • Perform graphic design and photo editing tasks for internal and external use. • Provides routine website management, including content creation, editing existing content and The City of Orono is an Equal Opportunity Employer 36 assisting users across departments. • Builds and manages the city's social media profiles and presence including Facebook, Instagram and other methods appropriate for the message and audience. • Assist with the implementation of community engagement events and initiatives such as focus groups, surveys, education, information presentations and other forums that foster public input. • At the direction of city leadership provides local media with articles about specific city programs or activities as well as periodic press releases to other media. • Promotes a positive image of the city and encourages productive, effective relationships with the public. • Assists the City Clerk and Administration Department by providing periodic administrative, election, and front desk back up support as needed. • Performs other related duties as assigned. Required Knowledge, Skills and Abilities Knowledge: • English Language Knowledge of the structure and content of the English language including the meaning and spelling of words, rules of composition, and grammar. • Customer and Personal Service — Knowledge of principles and processes for providing customer and personal services. This includes customer needs assessment, meeting quality standards for services, and evaluation of customer satisfaction. • Communications — Knowledge of best practice of communication sufficient to plan, design, write and edit print and electronic communications materials or tools. • Computers and Electronics — Knowledge of website standards and best practices sufficient to develop and maintain websites and measure of ability. Knowledge of Microsoft Office suite, graphic design software and social media platforms. Skills: • Reading Comprehension Understand written sentences and paragraphs in work related documents. • Active Listening Give full attention to what other people are saying, taking time to understand the points being made, asking questions as appropriate, and not interrupting at inappropriate times. • Speaking — Talk to others to convey information effectively. • Writing Communicate effectively in writing as appropriate for the needs of the audience. • Coordination Adjust actions in relation to others' actions. Abilities: • Written Comprehension Able to read and understand information and ideas presented in writing. • Oral Comprehension Able to listen to and understand information and ideas presented through spoken words and sentences. • Oral Expression Able to communicate information and ideas in speaking so others will understand. • Speech Recognition Able to identify and understand the speech of another person. • Written Expression — Able to communicate information and ideas in writing so others will understand. The City of Orono is an Equal Opportunity Employer 37 • Communications and Marketing — Able to create and produce marketing, social media and website materials to effectively communicate City business. Minimum Requirements • Two years of experience in managing social media platforms, marketing, and graphic design, and/or Associate's degree or technical education in communications, marketing, journalism, or related field. Desirable Oualifications • Bachelor's degree in communications, marketing, journalism, or related field. • Four years of experience in event planning and coordination experience, public service and/or local government work experience. Physical Demands and Working Environment This position operates in an office environment, where employees are protected from weather conditions or contaminants, but not necessarily occasional temperature changes. May have occasional outdoor exposure to elements. The City of Orono is an Equal Opportunity Employer 38 AGENDA ITEM Date: March 10, 2025 Title: Construction of Communications Specialist Office Space Presenter: Joe Ruthenberg, Superintendent - Parks, Facilities Section: Consent Agenda Item: 7 Purpose: The purpose of this council action is to approve the construction of office space for the new Communications Specialist position. 2. Background: At the January 27 council meeting, the council approved the addition of a communication specialist position. The hiring process has been completed with tentative start date set for March 13th. As this is a new position, office space and furniture is needed. Furniture purchase was approved at the last council meeting. To accommodate this new position, office space in the workroom will have to be renovated, a sprinkler head moved, and data port and electrical wiring moved/added. Quotes for the renovations were solicited and received. 3. Scope: The scope of this item includes demolition of cabinets and repositioning of counters (completed by park & facility staff), adding a new wall to create a new office space, relocating a sprinkler head, adding two new outlets to the new wall, installation of new data point wiring, painting, and new base to the wall. 4. Cost: Staff received three quotes for the work, DPG was the highest at $13,770.62, Carver Construction at $7,275 and True Built Construction at $6,500. The True Built Constructions quote does not include the addition of the two new electrical outlets or the moving of the sprinkler head, which would have to be contracted out at an additional cost. Though True Built Construction's initial quote is lower with the the additional cost of contracting a electrician and another contractor to move the sprinkler system, Carver's quote will be less expensive overall. Cost of the data point wiring by Security & Sound at $988.00 Office Furniture (already approved) $ 2,245.00 Data Port Wiring $ 988.00 Wall Install and Electrical Wiring $ 7,275.00 Total Project Cost $10,508.00 Funding: The capital improvement plan allocated $10,000 for this project with costs to be expended from the Facilities Fund. 6. Staff Recommendation: 39 Staff recommends approving the agreement with Carver Construction to construct the new Communication Specialist office space, and approving the quote from Security & Sound. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the communications specialist office construction with Carver Construction, and Security & Sound Exhibits A. True Built Quote B. Carver Quote C. DPG Quote D. Security & Sound Estimate 40 TRUE True Built MN LLC BUILT MN w �3� RECIPIENT: !� 1 • City of Orono Sent on Feb 26, 2025 2750 Kelley Parkway Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 Total �� 1 1 1 1 Product/Service Before start 1.0btain permit (as required) $0.00 2.Sprinkler system moved (by you) according to Code 3.Move cabinets away from work area (by you) 4.1 would like to consult with your electrician Prep Area Poly off worksite $0.00 Clean area Remove ceiling Remove ceiling and track in the way of new wall $0.00 Construct wall Construct new wall (10'6" by 8') with commercial grade steel stud/track $0.00 (Leave studs bare for outlet install new* and removal/moving of existing*) by your electrician Drywall Install 5/8" type x fire rated drywall $0.00 Drywall finishing Tape, Mud, and Sand $0.00 Paint Prime and paint (color match) $0.00 Install ceiling new track along new wall and drop tiles cut to fit $0.00 Base Trim Install base trim *as provided by City to match exisiting base trim $0.00 Clean Clean area $0.00 dispose of waste Total Estimate Labor and material $6,500.00 A deposit of $3,250.00 will be required to begin. Total $6,500.00 Length of project will depend on the (your) electrician moving and installing new outlets. Please have your maintenance/electrician get ahold of me with any questions relating to the project like sprinkler system, outlets of (new and existing) This quote is valid for the next 30 days, after which values may be subject to change. 41 CARVER CONSTRUCTION Feb 22, 2025 City of Orono Attn: Joe Ruthenberg 365 Old Crystal Bay Rd N Orono, MN 55356 952-249-46-84 juthenberg@oronomn.gov Agreement: Carver Construction, Inc. will provide products & services as outlined in this estimate to City of Orono at the above specified address. Specifications: Building Permit NOT included. • Construct interior wall — commercial steel studs/track, 5/8" Type X Fire rated Drywall Board. Approximately 10'-6" x 8'-0". • Abandon (1) electrical outlet on adjacent wall, add (2) outlets to new wall(one on each side). • Repair ceiling grid accordingly on each side of new wall. • Prime/paint new wall only. Color recipe to be provided by City of Orono. • Carpet "base trim" to match existing as close as possible, sample to be provided for approval. • Dust control via temporary poly walls, site protection, and project clean up as necessary. Proiect Estimate: $ 7,275.00 Option: 1) Add insulation to new wall cavity — Add $ 850.00 Payments: * 50% with a copy of signed agreement. * Balance upon completion. NOTE: 1) FIRE SUPPRESSION SPRINKLER SYSTEM MODIFICATION NOT INCLUDED. 2) ANY RELATED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS NOT INCLUDED(IE: ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, BUILDING, ETC. 3) DUCT WORK/HVAC NOT INCLUDED. Page 1 Carver Construction, Inc. / 1575 Sally Ave Watertown, MN 55388 / 763-458-0954 tim(&carverconstruction.com / Lic# BC377469 ►y: PRE -LIEN NOTICE NOTE: Our lumber provider will send you a certified letter detailing this information. It is routine/standard procedure. Please read it carefully and completely. Contact Carver Construction and/or the lumberyard with any questions you may have. (A) ANY PERSON OR COMPANY SUPPLYING LABOR OR MATERIALS FOR THIS IMPROVEMENT TO YOUR PROPERTY MAY FILE A LIEN AGAINST YOUR PROPERTY IF THAT PERSON OR COMPANY IS NOT PAID FOR THE CONTRIBUTIONS. (B) UNDER MINNESOTA LAW, YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO PAY PERSONS WHO SUPPLIED LABOR OR MATERIALS FOR THIS IMPROVEMENT DIRECTLY AND DEDUCT THIS AMOUNT FROM OUR CONTRACT PRICE, OR WITHHOLD THE AMOUNTS DUE FROM US UNTIL 120 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF THE IMPROVEMENT UNLESS WE GIVE YOU A LIEN WAIVER SIGNED BY PERSONS WHO SUPPLIED ANY LABOR OR MATERIAL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT AND WHO GAVE YOU TIMELY NOTICE. Initial Contract Signatures: ***All parties must sign and date this proposal*** Date Joe Ruthenberg - City of Orono, MN(buyer) Date Carver Construction, Inc. (seller) Any alterations or deviations from above specifications involving extra costs will be executed only upon written order, and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. This includes unknown circumstances found in concealed areas (ie: water damage, mold, etc). All agreements are contingent upon strikes, accidents, or delays beyond our control. Buyer specifically agrees to pay for all collection costs including employee time and expense, and all attorneys' fees and legal cost that Carver Construction, Inc. incurs to collect unpaid balances. You, the buyer, may cancel this purchase at any time prior to midnight of the 3rd business day after the date of this purchase. After the cancellation period this contract cannot be terminated without the agreement by both parties. Damage recoverable by the seller from the buyer for failure to accept delivery and installation shall be determined by the seller and will not fall below 20% of the purchase price and may be the full purchase price. Page 2 Carver Construction, Inc. / 1575 Sally Ave Watertown, NIN 55388 / 763-458-0954 tim(&carverconstruction.com / Lic# BC377469 43 Dering Pierson Group, LLC 22401 Industrial Blvd Rogers, MN 55374 Phone: 612.213.2210 Fax: 612.392.7944 www.deringpierson.com ESTIMATE PROJECT: Orono City Hall Rec Office DATE: 2/5/2025 Scope of Work Add wall to make new office, adjust sprinkler, finish space Item Qty. Units Unit Price Line Total Demo Cabinets and Move within Room Cabinets and Counters to Salvage 4 Hrs $ 104.50 $ 418.00 Build Standard Wall to Bottom of Existing Ceiling 88 SF $ 14.30 $ 1,258.40 Finish Sheetrock 1 LS $ 1,430.00 $ 1,430.00 Paint New Wall 1 LS $ 1,100.00 $ 1,100.00 Reattach Carpet Base and Provide New Vinyl Base in New Office 34 LF $ 16.50 $ 561.00 Relocate Sprinkler Head 1 LS $ 1,650.00 $ 1,650.00 Modify ACT at New Wall 2 HRS $ 104.50 $ 209.00 Add 2 Outlets in New Wall 1 LS $ 550.00 $ 550.00 Cleaning 4 HRS $ 104.50 $ 418.00 Temp Plastic Walls 2 EA $ 770.00 $ 1,540.00 General Conditions 1 LS $ 2,227.50 $ 2,227.50 Insurance 0.01 LS $ 11,361.90 $ 113.62 Profit 1 20%1 LS 1 $ 11,475.52 $ 2,295.10 Clarifications: 1. Prevailing Wages Included 2. Work to be completed during normal business hours 3. NO BUILDING PERMIT COST INCLUDED Submitted by: Dennis Marquardt Total Pricel $ 13,770.62 Dering Pierson Group, LLC 1 22401 Industrial Blvd, Rogers, MN 55374 1612.325.9450 1 of 1 44 EcaRiry o rvo co. 721 Industrial B1vd,Suite C2 Watertown, MN 55388 Name / Address CITY OF ORONO 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY ORONO, MN 55356 *email - invoices@oronomn.gov Estimate Date Estimate # 2/21/2025 14068 Rep Project Description Qty Cost Total DATA POINT WIRING - NEW WALL TO BE INSTALLED - CITY ADMIN OFFICE DATA WIRING - to main data rack 4 195.00 780.00 (2) behind the Postage Machine new location (2) for a desktop station / east wall cat6 plenum cabling - strapping and wiring labor included - terminated to data rack - - note: network switch or patch panel has to have a open port LEVITON TERMINATION / CAT5 KEYSTONE DECORA / 2 29.00 58.00 STAINLESS PLATE - (2) port SERVICE CALL - (2) TECH's 2 75.00 150.00 Subtotal $988.00 Sales Tax (0.0%) $0.00 THIS ESTIMATE DOES NOT INCLUDE SALES TAX Total $988.00 Phone # Fax # E-mail Web Site (952) 955-5075 mail@securityandsoundco.com www.securityandsoundco.com 45 AGENDA ITEM Date: March 10, 2025 Title: Park Commission Appointments - Resolution 7571 Presenter: Joe Ruthenberg, Superintendent - Parks, Facilities Section: Consent Agenda Purpose: The purpose of this action item is to make appointments to the Park Commission. Item: 8 2. Background: City Code Section 22.32 stipulates the Park Commission is composed of seven members, who serve staggered three-year terms. The council may, by majority, vote to appoint one or more alternate park commission members to serve when regular members are absent. Currently there are four (4) opening positions when commission members terms expired on March 1, 2025. 3. Summary: The City Council has conducted interviews of 4 applicants for the commission. Council directed staff to draft a resolution to appoint all 4 interviewees as regular commissioners and to re -appoint current commissioner Rick Carter as an alternate. 4. Current: Current Commissioners Commissioner Term Expires Brian Roath March 1, 2026 Gordy Stofer March 1, 2026 Michael Huddy March 1, 2026 Rick Carter Request Re -Appointment Cameron Porter Term Expired March 1, 2025 Vacant Vacant Casey Hudson (alternate) Term Expired March 1, 2025 Sandra Rasmussen (alternate) Term Expired March 1, 2025 New Applicants: Four applications were received and Mr. Rick Carter requested to be reappointed. All four new candidates were interviewed by the Council at the February 24 Council Work Session. Council directed staff to draft a resolution to appoint all 4 interviewees as regular commissioners and to re- appoint current commissioner Rick Carter as an alternate. Applicant Council Directed Appointments Janie Delaney Park Commission Mollie Reynolds Park Commission Kim Carswell Park Commission 46 Jacob Selseth Park Commission Rick Carter Park Commission Alternate 6. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council appoint the applicants to the Commission COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt the resolution 7571 to appointment new Park Commissioners. Exhibits A. Park Commission Appointments Resolution 7571 ►, tl � T\ kESHv_ CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. /5/1 A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING APPOINTMENTS TO PARK COMMISSION WHEREAS, the City of Orono, is authorized by Minn. Stat. 412.501, may have or continue park board; and WHEREAS, City Code of Ordinances section 22 establishes a Park Commission of seven members; and WHEREAS, the city council conducted interviews on February 24; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota new appointments for the Orono Park Commission are as follows: Appointment Designation Term End Name Park Commissioner March 1, 2028 Janie Delaney Park Commissioner March 1, 2028 Mollie Reynolds Park Commissioner March 1, 2028 Kim Carswell Park Commissioner March 1, 2028 Jacob Selseth Park Commissioner Alternate March 1, 2028 Rick Carter Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held March 10, 2025. ATTEST Christine Lusian, City Clerk CITY OF ORONO Bob Tunheim, Mayor 48 AGENDA ITEM Date: March 10, 2025 Title: Planning Commission Appointments - Resolution 7570 Presenter: Laura Oakden, Community Development Director Section: Consent Agenda Purpose: To make appointments to the Planning Commission Item: 9 2. Background: The Planning Commission is made up of seven regular members who serve staggered 3-year terms. A commissioner can serve up to three 3-year terms. The City Council has conducted interviews of 2 applicants for the commission. Council directed staff to draft a resolution to appoint 2 interviewees as regular commissioners. Commissioner McCutcheon requested not be be re -appointed at his terms as a regular commissioner which ends March 31, 2025 but is requested to stay on as an alternate. Additionally there is a current alternate Ted Schultze, which needs reappointment as an alternate since this is a annual appointment. Two of the resigning commissioners had time left on their terms,and to maintain staggered terms limits the two newly appointed commissioners will be one year terms. 3. Summary: Proposed Commissioner Appointments: Commissioner Current Term End Status Chris Bollis 03/2028 3rd Term Jon Ressler 03/2027 3rd Term Kelly Prchal 03/2028 1st Term Andrew Jarnot 03/2027 1st Term Thomas Brandabur 03/2027 1st Term Sam Tift Proposed- 03/2026 1 st Term Shane Weltzin Proposed- 03/2026 1 st Term Mark McCutcheon- Alternate Proposed- 03/2026 Annual Ted Schutlze- Alternate Proposed- 03/2026 Annual Drew Herther 03/2026 Annual 4. Cost: Planning Commissioner is a volunteer appointed position by the City Council and are not paid. 5. Staff Recommendation: Staff is recommending to adopt resolution 7570 to appoint new planning commissioners. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt Resolution 7570 Exhibits A. Planning Commission Appointments Resolution 7570 49 kESHv_ CITY OF ORONO �. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. /5/O A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING APPOINTMENTS TO PLANNING COMMISION WHEREAS, the City of Orono, is authorized by Minn. Stat. 462.354, may create a planning agency; and WHEREAS, City Code of Ordinances section 74 establishes a Planning Commission of seven members; and WHEREAS, the city council conducted interviews on February 24, 2025; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota new appointments for the Orono Planning Commission are as follows: APPOINTMENT/DESIGNATION Term End Name Planning Commissioner March 31, 2026 Sam Tift Planning Commissioner March 31, 2026 Shane Weltzin Planning Commissioner Alternate March 31, 2026 - Annual Mark McCutcheon Planning Commissioner Alternate March 31, 2026 Ted Schutlze Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held March 10, 2025. ATTEST: Christine Lusian, City Clerk CITY OF ORONO Bob Tunheim, Mayor 50 AGENDA ITEM Date: March 10, 2025 Title: Annual Performance Review of the City Administrator Presenter: Adam Edwards, City Administrator / Engineer Section: Consent Agenda Item: 10 Purpose: The purpose of this item is to summarize the closed session held on February 24 to review City Administrator Adam Edwards' performance in 2024. 2. Background: Pursuant to the State's Open Meeting Law, Minn. Stat. Section 13D.05, Subd. 3(a), the City Council conducted a closed meeting for approximately 20 minutes as part of its February 24, 2025 regular council meeting to evaluate the performance of City Administrator/ City Engineer Adam Edwards. 3. Summary: The Mayor, all Council Members, as well as Administrator Adam Edwards and City Attorney Soren Mattick attended the closed session. At the meeting, the Mayor out lined a process for completing the annual review administrator's performance in 2024. The council agreed with the proposed process and directed the administrator to reschedule the review for the first council meeting in April. 4. Staff Recommendation: I recommend approval of this council action. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve this summary. 51 AGENDA ITEM Date: March 10, 2025 Title: Carman Bay LID Insurance Agreement Termination Presenter: Maggie Jin, Finance Director Section: Consent Agenda Item: 11 Purpose: The purpose of this action is to gain approval to terminate the Carman Bay Lake Improvement District Agreement for insurance coverage. 2. Background: Carman Bay Lake Improvement District (CBLID) was established on July 24, 2017. At the December 11, 2017, Council meeting, a cooperative agreement between the City and CBLID was approved for consideration of insurance, costs, and liability responsibilities between the City and CBLID. Upon discussion with the City's insurance agent and the League of Minnesota Cities' counsel, staff is recommending termination of the insurance agreement and request that CBLID obtain its own coverage for liability and bond coverage. The benefit of the district obtaining its own insurance coverage outweighs being covered by the City. Each party will not affect the others' liability limits. Additionally, per state statute, bond coverage is required of lake improvement districts, which the City does not provide as the board members are not City employees and background checks are not performed on non -City employees. CBLID have agreed to move forward with this process to obtain their own insurance coverage. 3. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval to terminate the insurance agreement between the City and the Carman Bay Lake Improvement District. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve terminating the insurance agreement between the City and the Carman Bay Lake Improvement District. Exhibits A. Original Carman Bay Lake Improvement District Agreement 2017 B. Termination of Insurance Agreement between CBLID and City 2025 52 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT. made and entered into by and between the CITY OF ORONO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and CARMAN BAY LAKE IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, ("District"). NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants and agreements as set forth herein. both parties hereby acknowledge the sufficiency thereof, the City and District agree as folloN%s: 1. INSURANCE. City will add District as a covered part- to all insurance policies held bN the City with the league of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. 2. COSTS. The District shalt be responsible for paying any- and all costs associated with its use of the insurance coverages noted above, including, but not limited to. the payment of all deductibles and co -pays for claims against the District and any and all costs above and beyond the insurance coverage limits. 3. LIABILITY. Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted to impose any duty or liabilitt onto the City for claims made against the District. The District shall indemnify and hold harmless the ity. its officers, agents. and employees. of and from any and all claims, demands. actions. cause of action, including costs and attorney's tees. arising out of or by reason of the District's ex e ution or performance of its rights. po ers. and duties, and further agrees to defend at its sole costand expense any action or proceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsciever character arising therefrom. 4. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreements between the parties with respect to insurance coverage and the parties agree that there were no inducements or representations leading to the execution ofthis Agreement except as contained herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Cite and District have approved and executed this :agreement as of"the dates listed below. Dated: c Y,l�____• 2017. CITY OF ORONO By; - -- - aninai nis Nl"alsh. ayor And: Carlson. C it. C ler - 1v4<6s+1 Dated: No i/efi W r! .2017. CARMAN HAY LAKE IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT BY: STr �tr�......,���(S�!t_ Chairman 53 TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the CITY OF ORONO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and CARMAN BAY LAKE IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota ("District"). The City and the District may be referred to herein individually as a "Party" and together as the "Parties". WHEREAS, the City and the District entered into an Agreement dated December 11, 2017 (hereinafter "Original Agreement"); and WHEREAS, under the Original Agreement, the City added the District as a covered party to all insurance policies held by the City with the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to terminate the Original Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein, the City and the District do hereby agree as follows: 1. RECITALS. The above recitals are incorporated into this Agreement as if fully set forth herein. 2. TERMINATION OF ORIGINAL AGREEMENT. The Original Agreement is terminated effective immediately. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the District have approved and executed this Agreement as of the dates listed below. Dated: M vqv&, 2025 CARMAN BAY LAKE IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT Dated: , 2025 CITY OF ORONO M. 234980vl Bob Tunheim, Mayor Chairman 54 ATTEST: Christine Lusian, City Clerk 234980v1 55 AGENDA ITEM Date: March 10, 2025 Title: North Water Plant Fiber Connection Presenter: Maggie Jin, Finance Director Section: Consent Agenda Item: 12 Purpose: The purpose of this council action is to gain approval of the project provided by LOGIS to install fiber connection to the North Water Plant. 2. Background: As technology continues to advance, modern water plants require high-speed data connections to ensure efficient operation and real-time communication for monitoring and responding to water quality, pressure and usage data. Currently, the water tower systems (SCADA) transfer information by radio signal from the water plants to the old Public Works building (temporary North Fire Station) and further transmitted to the new Public Works building. The radio signals are emitted from each water plant to the north water tower then to the old Public Works building, and finally, to the new Public Works building. North water plant is located at 2250 Wayzata Blvd W and Navarre water plant is located at 2345 Blaine Ave. The radio technology is outdated and becoming less reliable, with the system having communication issues multiple times weekly. Fiber connection is more reliable and allows much faster connection with up to 100 GBS. Fiber technology allows for more secure communication network which is critical for safeguarding the city's water infrastructure against cyber threats. Real- time monitoring will be enhance and enable the city to respond quicker to potential issues, reducing the likelihood of service disruptions or safety concerns. Additionally, fiber will be a long-term cost effective solution to support the water plant's future technological needs to reduce the need for frequent upgrades or repairs to the outdated systems. At this time, staff is recommending moving forward with switching the north water plant to fiber connection. In the meantime, the Navarre water plant will continue to operate with radio technology until fiber connection becomes available in the upcoming years. The system will run in a hybrid environment until both plants switch over to fiber, in which case, an ethernet switch at the north water plant and programming for system communication will be completed simultaneously. 3. Cost: The cost is not to exceed $67,172.50. This includes the cost of materials, labor, and installation. The project was included in the 2025 CIP at an estimate of $67,000. 4. Funding: The project will be funded by the Water Fund. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the project to install fiber connection to the North Water Plant with cost not to exceed $67,172.50. 56 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the project to install fiber connection to the North Water Plant with cost not to exceed $67,172.50. Exhibits A. Project Design and Cost Estimate B. Route Map 57 L El I 'LOCAL OLIVERNMENT INFORMATION BYBTEM9 5750 Duluth Street, Golden Valley, MN 55422-4063 Main: 763.543.2600 1 Service: 763.543.2662 Project Design and Cost Estimate Approval Request Primary Contact Enter Incident# (?) Name* Member* 385430 David Klitzke Orono Email * dklitzke@oronomn.gov Phone * 9522494615 Are There Other Members/External Parties Involved In The Project Yes No Other Participating Members/External Parties Organization Name Contact Name Contact Phone Contact Email Do You Know The Cost Allocation For This Project (?) Yes No Project Scope Project Name* (?) OR -Pump House Well #3 2250 Wayzata Blvd to CH - New Build * Planned Unplanned Planned Project Category New Build Repair Relocate Overbuild Splice Only Other 58 Project Location* (?) OR -Pump House Well #3 2250 Wayzata Blvd to CH - New Build Location A* (?) Pump House Well #3 2250 Wayzata Blvd Location Z (?) City Hall 2750 Kelley Pkwy, Orono, MN 55356 Project Description* Here are the our Purposed Fiber Locations: Pump House Well #3 2250 Wayzata Blvd Long Lake, MN 55356 Time Line: 2025/2026 Submitted Date* 11/21/2024 Due Date 11 /3/2025 Priority Low- 9 Months Plus Benefits CNET INET Attachment Administrative Use Only Approval Request* Below is the estimated "not to exceed" cost to complete fiber connectivity to Pumphouse #3 located at 2250 Wayzata Blvd. W. Orono, MN 55356 to Orono City Hall. This estimate includes the cost of the switch/network equipment for the pumphouse. Material cost: $9,600.00 Labor cost: $52,572.50 Switch cost: $5,000.00 Total estimated cost: $ 67,172.50 Estimated annual locates $582.00 Labor $ 52,572.50 Materials $ 14,600.00 Cost Estimate Total* $ 67,172.50 Estimated Annual Locates $ 582.00 Attachment* 385430 Route Map.pdf 173.58KB 59 60 385430 OR -Pump House Well #3 2250 Wayzata Blvd to CH - New Build r& fr AIL Below is the estimated "not to exceed" cost to complete fiber connectivity to Pump house #3 located at 2250 Wayzata Blvd. W. Orono, MN 55356 to Orono City Hall. This estimate includes the cost of the switch/network equipment for the pumphouse. Material cost: $9,600.00 Labor cost: $52,572.50 Switch cost: $5,000.00 Total estimated cost: $ 67,172.50 Estimated annual locates $582.00. 61 AGENDA ITEM Date: March 10, 2025 Title: Purchase Equipment - Stump Grinder Attachment Presenter: Joe Ruthenberg, Superintendent - Parks, Facilities Section: Consent Agenda Purpose: To purchase a stump grinder for use throughout the city. Item: 13 2. Background: The Fecon FST280 is a low -speed, high -torque grinder that ensures rapid, efficient, and safe stump elimination, enhancing productivity across landscaping, tree services, agriculture, and municipal projects. It easily attaches to equipment that we already have, can tackle low vegetation to tall stumps, and tree roots. It is also a direct drive system that eliminates, belts, pulleys, gearboxes, actuators and electrical connections saving on repair and maintenance costs. It can perform a variety of grinding, including below -grade, face and edge to minimize wear and maximize mulching. It's maneuverability allows it to grind closer and safely due to exceptional visibility. 3. Summary: Purchasing a stump grinder offers several benefits, particularly in terms of cost savings for the city. Typically, hiring a contractor to remove a stump can cost between $250 and $350, depending on factors such as the stump's size, type, location, and any additional removal or cleanup needed. Another option, renting a stump grinder for use by city staff usually costs between $150 and $400 per day, depending on the rental location and the size of the grinder. Additional advantages of owning a stump grinder include improved public safety. By grinding down stumps, the city can eliminate trip hazards in parks, on sidewalks, and in other public spaces, thereby reducing the risk of accidents. Furthermore, grinding stumps can help mitigate pest infestations associated with decaying wood. Faster cleanup and maintenance are also key benefits. With a stump grinder, city staff can remove stumps quickly and efficiently, avoiding the delays associated with waiting for contractors or arranging rental equipment. This capability helps keep city parks, roadsides, and green spaces cleaner and more visually appealing. Lastly, there are environmental benefits to consider. Grinding down stumps aids in replanting efforts by clearing space for new trees and landscaping projects, and it prevents the regrowth of unwanted trees and invasive species. 4. Cost: The city received a state contracted quote for the requested equipment, including taxes and delivery of $11,965. Funding: The stump grinder attachment will be funded through the equipment fund. This equipment was identified in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for $15,000. 6. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that council accept the quote from Lano Equipment for $11,965. 62 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the purchase of a stump grinder attachment from Lano Equipment. Exhibits A. Stump Grinder Quote 63 Iq co QUOTE - DO NOT PAY Land Quote: 02-183333 PO: FST280 HIGH FLOW Date: 1/7/2025 Custld: CITYORONO 3021 W 133rd St • Shakopee MN 55379.952-445.6310 6140 Hwy 10 NW • Anoka MN 55303.763-323-1720 23560 Hwy 55• Loretto, MIN 55357.763-479.8200 Cust Email: invoices@ci.orono.mn.us www.lanoequip.com • www.lanoeq.com • www.lanogardengear.com Phone: (952) 249-4600 Salesperson: Scott.F User: Scott.F Bill To: CITY OF ORONO BRODY POOL 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY ORONO, MN 55356 Ship To: CITY OF ORONO ern Type Description Qty Tax Price Discount Net Pric TUMP GRINDER QU Stumper STUMP GRINDER Yr: 2025 1.0000 $11,965.00 $11,965.00 ATT - STUMPER-FECON FST280 HIGH FLOW (25 - 45 GPM) Total STUMP GRINDER $11,965.0 Total: $11,965.0 otals Sub Total: $11,965.0 Total Tax: $0.0 Invoice Total: $11,965.0 Signature: Quote is Valid for 30 days, programs and discounts subject to change without notice AGENDA ITEM Date: March 10, 2025 Item: 14 Title: LA24-000056, 4375 Bayside Road, Final Plat "BOBWHITE MEADOWS" Resolution 7558 Presenter: Melanie Curtis, Planner Section: Consent Agenda Purpose: The purpose of this item is to approve the final plat of BOBWHITE MEADOWS. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline: The final plat application was submitted on October 14, 2024, and was considered to be substantially complete on January 21, 2025. The 120-day review timing will expire on May 21, 2025. 3. Background: The Council granted preliminary approval for BOBWHITE MEADOWS on July 8, 2024. The Developer has prepared all of the necessary documents and completed the final plat requirements. At this time the Developer is requesting Final Plat approval to finalize the plat of BOBWHITE MEADOWS a three -lot subdivision which includes one new buildable lot. 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment: The Planning Commission reviewed the preliminary plat on June 17, 2024 (PC meeting video); Council approval of the Preliminary Plat was granted on July 8, 2024 (Council meeting video). Preliminary Plat approval is valid for up to one year from the Council approval date. Staff Recommendation: The applicant has completed all of the final plat requirements outlined in Resolution No. 7488 (attached as Exhibit C). Staff recommends approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED The Council should consider a motion to approve the final plat of BOBWHITE MEADOWS. Exhibits A. Resolution 7558 Final Plat B. Final Plat Mylars C. Pre Plat Resolution 7488 D. Executed Trail Easement 65 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7558 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF BOBWHITE MEADOWS FILE NO. LA24-000056 WHEREAS, the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter "City Council") has adopted subdivision and land development regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the Steve White (hereinafter the "Developer") is the owner of the properties addressed 4375 and 4246 Bayside Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") also identified as PID's 06-117-23-12-0009 and 06-117-23-11-0003 and legally described as shown in Exhibit A (hereinafter the "Property"); WHEREAS on May 21, 2024, the Developer applied for Preliminary Plat approval to subdivide the Property into three (3) buildable lots. WHEREAS, at its regular meeting on July 8, 2024, the Orono City Council granted approval for the Preliminary Plat per the findings and conditions of Resolution No. 7488 by a 5 to 0 vote; and WHEREAS, on October 14, 2024, the Developers applied for final plat approval. The final plat application was deemed to be substantially complete on January 21, 2025; and WHEREAS, the Developers have agreed to comply with all conditions of Resolution No. 7488 and has completed or has agreed to complete all other requirements of the platting regulations of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, based upon the findings of Resolution No. 7488, the Orono City Council and the City of Orono does hereby approve the plat of BOBWHITE MEADOWS, Hennepin County, Minnesota (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit B), subject to the following conditions: 1) Development within BOBWHITE MEADOWS is subject to the Conclusions, Orders and Conditions enumerated within Preliminary Plat Resolution No 7488 dated July 8, 2024. 2) Dedication on the plat of the perimeter Drainage and Utility Easements as required in Resolution 7488. 66 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7558 3) The approvals granted in this Resolution shall become effective only when all conditions of approval requiring actions by the Developers have been satisfied. 4) Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)-approved permits for the grading, stormwater management facilities, storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) and erosion control plan shall be submitted as needed. 5) A title opinion for the Property and certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the Property have been submitted. 6) An executed trail easement has been provided. 7) The properties are not within the MUSA and will be served by private water supply wells and septic systems. 8) Payment of Development Fees Required: Total: $20,410.81 a. Final Plat application fee: $550 (2024 application fee). b. Park Dedication Fee: $3,710.81. c. Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee: $16,120. 9) The City Clerk shall release the plat documents for filing only upon certification by the City Attorney, Community Development Director, and City Engineer that all requirements of the platting regulations have been satisfied. 10) According to City Code Section 82-142, the aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with Hennepin County within one year of Council approval (on or before March 10, 2026), together with a certified original copy of this resolution and executed copies of the easements and covenants pertinent thereto. 11) Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ATTEST: ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 10th day of March, 2025. CITY OF ORONO: Christine Lusian, City Clerk Bob Tunheim, Mayor 67 LEGAL DESCRIPTION : (4375 Bayside Rd.) Per Doc. No. 7174932 That part of the West Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian which lies Westerly of the following described line: Beginning at the Northwest corner of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 6; thence on an assumed bearing of East along the north line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 1104.0 feet to the point of beginning of the line being described; thence South 22 degrees 30 minutes West a distance of 1280.0 feet; thence South 41 degrees West a distance of 250.0 feet; thence South 19 degrees West a distance of 443.0 feet; thence on a bearing of South to the south line of said Northeast Quarter and said line there ending. EXCEPT that part thereof described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Northeast Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of East along the North line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 514 feet; thence South 27 degrees 30 minutes West a distance of 589 feet to the centerline of the County Road which extends across said Northeast Quarter; thence Northwesterly along the centerline of said County Road to the West line of said Northeast Quarter; thence Northerly along said West line to the point of beginning. ALSO EXCEPT that part of said Northeast Quarter of Section 6 described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Northeast Quarter; thence East along the North line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 514 feet to actual point of beginning; thence deflecting right 117 degrees 30 minutes a distance of 589 feet to the centerline of County Road No. 84; thence deflecting left along said centerline a distance of 180 feet; thence deflecting left 81 degrees 19 seconds a distance of 662.11 feet to a point on the North line of said Section 6; located 216.55 feet East of the point of beginning; thence West along said North line a distance of 216.55 feet to point of beginning. (4375 Bayside Rd.) Per Doc. No. A10219199 That part of the West half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian lying northerly of the centerline of Bayside Road and easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the Northwest corner of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 6; thence on an assumed bearing of East along the North line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 1104.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line being described; thence South 22 degrees 30 minutes West a distance of 1280.00 feet and said line there ending. Records of Hennepin County, MN. Abstract Property. 68 (4246 Bayside Rd.) Per Doc. No. 11204192 The West One -Half (W1/2) of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4 NE 1/4) of Section Six (6), Township 117, Range 23, according to the United States Government Survey thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 69 OL m m O n N m m m 'y " 9H °4. n m12 n'OcP UP D M O �iy o �i� m�aa ON a q ° a 3zg .I'a OTT 5 3 3 3 � m N�Rm a NO z 'Q A g o$ 3��C9 Q. £ �� n 32 RSy'S `�iX� a.w`2 gmm w m ,Z nA y '� 0 3P3 ry $ 3 o�s' Rn a ry tom m?°� y gig oR° M owz m�8� �3a z m R = s ; 9m s �' 1 ig �m1 � m 90 S to ; S 4${g 3 g n p O H1 g°O 43 D 3 Cl) Cl) ; B m A n$ r Q ° a m 4dd M 3� n O�m� o a5� ;�o '_ m _ 0 D H $� v$ s;g°v m� q�� �w aim 3 n T m a- 8, , �S NK al RRo Ra o ad a$smom- a d a n'3 5.bo Rsa m s gg m r R z an �o� Ro. a�� �N a m fn °� 0 3 ��: 3 q R gj R� qd dosiq D n C H 5. `s^ rvo3 o2 c $z23 Cl) ° 11 IRs �� 'z V C B S 1. S. . Z'z 1 m no ' �Sm 5 - < m $ 'R'� S.i5° 33 $oq 4� 4i O m 9 `-gym mnm @z SSy ;gz z� 5 a 'E ��R's _8 R D to n m VEX _ a_ to m -� n_ g3'O£ Oq z _1'� ms zmzINS i $$ 'n°Ez QP o11 H u� 00 2n �nm 93 mm gpmp� mn^ z�� 'qq n ' 'v O' z'. O� �L CA x m m N O n N x m €g H F p g f y ------------ AR� 9 y0y a O m 9g� 'SAN H�sAH Z NO m! A % � Ro N ti O 8! 0 � 19-4 m > rn D � AO D z �p zm O $o 08 CRISTOFOR! £" WOODS S 90-00'00' E (DESC.) I '-, 889°57-00'E(MEAS.j 1255.19 v o r U Fj �u An, 16 See op 6F YF T CA p�48 g a� F m 01S �♦ D \(( b �^/ Ro ®��'� see° 0 m r------ S89°59'22"E 091.58 \ TA A P 0i3 I O-G m o���b 4JN $41 I m p i s r N 89°58'75' E 2322.09 :161 MiTIMM I I I = J� I ;E1101 Rio I TIT KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Steven C. White and Patricia L. H. White, husband and wife, fee owner of the following described property: The West One -Half (W1/2) of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4 NE 1f4) of Section Six (6), Township 117, Range 23. TA That part of the West half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian lying northerly of the centerline of Bayside Road and easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the Northwest corner of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 6; thence on an assumed bearing of East along the North line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 1104.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line being described; thence South 22 degrees 30 minutes West a distance of 1280.00 feet and said line there ending; AND That part of the West Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian which lies Westerly of the following described line: Beginning at the Northwest Corner of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 6; thence on an assumed bearing of East along the North line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 1104.0 feet to the point of beginning of the line being described; thence South 22 degrees 30 minutes West a distance of 1280.0 feet; thence South 41 degrees West a distance of 250.0 feet; thence South 19 degrees West a distance of 443.0 feet; thence on a bearing of South to the South line of of said Northeast Quarter and said line there ending. EXCEPT that part thereof described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Northeast Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of East along the North line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 514 feet; thence South 27 degrees 30 minutes West a distance of 589 feet to the centerline of the County Road which extends across said Northeast Quarter; thence Northwesterly along the centerline of said County Road to the West line of said Northeast Quarter; thence Northerly along said West line to the point of beginning. ALSO EXCEPT that part of said Northeast Quarter of Section 6 described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Northeast Quarter; thence East along the North line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 514 feet to actual point of beginning; thence deflecting right 117 degrees 30 minutes a distance of 589 feet to the centerline of County Road No. 84; thence deflecting left along said centerline a distance of 180 feet; thence deflecting left 81 degrees 19 seconds a distance of 662.11 feet to a point on the North line of said Section 6; located 216.55 feet East of the point of beginning; thence West along said North line a distance of 216.55 feet to point of beginning. Have caused the same to be surveyed and platted as BOBWHITE MEADOWS, and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use the drainage and utility easements created by this plat In witness whereof said Steven C. White and Patricia L. H. White, husband and wife, have hereunto set their hands this day of , 20 Steven C. White Patricia L. H. White STATE OF COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by Steven C. White and Patricia L. H. White. Signature Notary's printed name Notary Public, County My commision expires I Mark S. Gronberg do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of 120 Mark S. Gronberg, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License Number 12755 STATE OF COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 by Mark S. Gronberg. Signature Notary's printed name Notary Public, County My commision expires City Council, City of Orono, Minnesota This plat of BOBWHITE MEADOWS was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this day of , 20 , and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. City Council, City Of Orono, Minnesota Mayor , Clerk COUNTY AUDITOR, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that taxes payable in 20 and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat, dated this Daniel Rogan, County Auditor By SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to MN. STAT. Sec. 383B.565, (1969), this plat has been approved this Chris F. Mavis, County Surveyor By Deputy day of COUNTY RECORDER, Hennepin County, Minnesota hereby certify that the within plat of BOBWHITE MEADOWS was recorded in this office this Amber Bougie, County Recorder By , Deputy day of , 20 20 day of , 20 , at o'clock . M GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, PLANNERS SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS FOUND HENN. CO. NORTHEAST COR. MONUMENT 2 INCH- SEC. 6-117-23 CAPPED IRON PIPE " I � � j-ti r^ • i r 1� � f (C)r0 ;/ At�DN. L1> S° ' " 06, 89 57 00 E EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF I i1000, 661.91 l OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 j OF SEC.6-117-23 N 00019'19" E 1320.92 i i i A 513.18 , i•-'-----------------------------------------------------------7 - i 05° 10'35" --- - -- t I S 89°05'00" EJJ - L-37.61 61.50 r • f / CRD. BRG.=N 65o 02 54n W %� y- 0) CRD=37.59 Cb -8'--L N 50°55'12" E �` °po � / ! WETLAND % 6\ /!;......;;:: 52.38 J J co �// % o r n � 33'l�/ N 13'58'18" E •�� / c / L.., S 67 3812 E 68.73 �_� ,-:` / r.` 36.13 DRAINAGE �' k� / / ' 2 �. k-J / °' EASEMENT i'�. goy /� \ -,0o, * �' Lo T � o h 1 ' EDGE OF �'<\ ��� /���i�/� ' A I p� WETLAND 9 �g �v ��� a��� J /i// Cps 4J 0 13°29a9 cn ��` h �' �k! 82. ,rIG� tom$ • i �• rr 0. : h� v WBAY^o .�-- / oc' / \�P��7 , U, j !G NCO - J �J. C 1� / ��� f,�i') I 163.85 2s� \ �PS��'3�$ ��\ �� / 6y0•�,�ptk ` 0 I �� 0 62 45.87 11'1 .,.. l r/ �� �� / v 9 ��1 ,00 1 WETLAND CO / .i WETLAND L----------------------------------------------------------------- -J ----------------------- -----------------=--- 1--------------S 00°10'O6" W 943.61 ,.. / ; ... ` „- 1 DRAINAGE AND v- I A=25°55'03" n UTILITY EASEMENT LO I 5N69 L=288.60 / ,�� �_�-t-----'� OVER ALL OF LO I WEST LINE OF THE NE 1/4 `' ° 1't21 / ^ O V TLOT A OUTLOT A I OF THE NE 1!4 OF SEC. 6-117-23SgZs 38.10 ---�•1----------------------------------' _ 8� -- ��-yr / -- ----------------------------------- 84: 7 .-. t EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF Z I - �/ / N 00° 10'06" E 422.47 i V Q � 1 (n W t� OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC. 6-117-23 U, rn � I �`� cy / 1 W IM i WET LAND: l'� / / '' R=572.00 1 m i A=13'40'45" i w o I �``' `------. E L=136.56 0 0 1 EDGE OF L- J`^D / / R=650.00 CRD. BRG.=S 52°03143" E i b I WETLAND i / ` L=107.1E CRD.=136.24 0 00 I 30 191.81 "t, (�co I \\2. % DRAINAGE' (n t EASEMENT / / J N ' t•. POINT OF" 1 :• // i BEGINNING i t '� J^• 1 1 7 / 0) //co 1 / co / v / / 1" t- SOUTH LINE OF THE Co1 N 1/2 OF THE NE 1/4 / i OF SEC. 6-117-23 M% CENTERL cV i�J ------- PER DOCI NO. 6998371 EMENT I / aJ C-) , ,, ; 1280 00 i l / N 23*50'19" 53.05 1 , ��� ' /op % S 30' t r EDGE OF �// j ; /o ; / 22°3 �f�" ' WET LANDto �� / `\�� 3�90" ht!(0 S 1 ------------�sR 1 LO 4D01"r� M o / is 00, 1 WETLAND ) (c co Q,. ! 44Ss�� i co, ,lam0 80o6,79.(0 ! a?,j/�:' 44/ CQ. 0 yC.ggRUNE 0�,.,-_ : i O. I `.:,` S 00, 0„ (PLAT 91H' NO.84 / :,, ,:' 90 03'00„ w q),, G, 66 (,�`Fq,C� , 420 S to �� 0\1/ R=352.62 F �. NORTH LINE OF THE Q� �.' - p-36°02'46" i 1 NE 1/4 OF SEC. 6-117-23 0^ °o ow r •,..• y / " / / L=221.84 ! SURVEY �'',;b , .. ." p .ti / / ,' t LINE '' ... I POINT OF NON TANGENT •---------------' R=358.00 i COMPOUND CURVATURE ;�. ', i,! ��• A-03°41'13"uJ i NW COR. OF THE i L=23.04 61 �' ;• �! I + M +n NE 1/4 OF SEC. 6-117-23 I 2\6 i '" .,• /��� EDGE OF ' LAND I N N '. 1 : i �� OPT GOB tea -----------/��� 8 �25� \`WET i co i FOUND HENN. CO: c�l� �`�/' /gip$ F 1g2 ;� N 44°43'52" E I C0 NORTH 1/4 COR. '; I MONUMENT C.I.M '� 6 �o ';g5 -`-' \\ :' 69.42 /5 '\6 / 1 I SEC. 6-117-23... 1 08��� 5320� Zp9 ,� S 00°12'00'221 221.0-� W' .' E --- 3 .• z...•-//146.76 , = •---------� i T LAND \ ._ __--------- 6 1799 71.99--------------------- ----- ) ------------- i �' •:•- ---- 328.29 o c n i ` DRAINAGE N 00008'19" W 1273 +- WEST LINE OF THE S 89 45 42 E 1 �� �� EASEMENT NE 1/4 OF SEC. 6-117-23 2646.93 N 32002'53" W " 159.06 N 00008' 19" W 2646.39 • FOUND HENN. CO." NORTHWEST COR. MONUMENT C.I.M SEC. 6-117-23 GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. EDGE OF WET LAND -'CO - 126 +- ..! HIGHEST KNOWN LAKE ELEVATION OF LAKE MINNETONKA WAS 931.11 FT., NGVD-1929 ON 6-23-14, ACCORDING TO THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES WATER ELEVATION OF LAKE MINNETONKA WAS 928.66 FT., NGVD-1929 ON 26 NOVEMBER, 2024 BENCHMARK IS A BRASS DISC SURVEY MONUMENT IN GROUND 15 FEET WEST OF SWALE RIPRAP, 25 FEET NORTH OF CONCRETE CURB AT EXIT OF GRAYS BAY AREA, ELEVATION=932.7FT., NGVD-1929 RECORD - REFERS TO DIMENSIONS IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 6998371, RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. S 00-00-00" W (DESC.) S 00°03'00" W (MEAS.) LAKE MINNETONKA DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT �s NORTH ARM SHORELINE OF LAKE MINNETONKA AS LOCATED ON 25 NOVEMBER 2024 017 ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, PLANNERS NORTH A' M `1 i AIL�� Ft�t.iR;ild 1� • T •� i � L)D. 1 Iff,� EAST 1/4 COR. SEC. 6-117-23 FOUND HENN. CO. ' MONUMENT C.I.M I I I . i I i 1 i I i I i t , 0 C-i N co (N LO 00 LO 0 rn 0 ii SOUTH LINE OF THE ---- NE 1/4 OF SEC. 6-117-23 I 1 I i I 1 I I i I 1 1 , N N t� () N 00 `s 00 70J Drainage and utility easements shown thus: '1 � N Being 10 feet in width, and adjoining lot lines, and being 12 feet in width, and adjoining right of way lines unless otherwise indicated on this plat. NOT TO SCALE O Denotes Set 1/2 inch by 14 inch iron pipe monument, marked by MN Lic. No. 12755 Denotes found Henn. Co. R.O.W Cast Iron Monument Denotes found Cast Iron Monument, as noted THE NORTH LINE OF THE NE 114 OF SEC. 6-117-23 IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF S 89°57'00" E 0 60 120 240 SCALE IN FEET SOUTH 1/4 COR. SEC. 6-117-23 189-58'15" E It N 00008'19" W ' " FOUND CO. ,� 2652:75 l 2742.50 .HENN. MONUMENT C.I.M WEST 1/4 COR. SEC. 6-117-23 NORTH AR I FOUND HENN. CO. I L. 3 I A I` �.�. MONUMENT C.I.M SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL N0.7488 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELEVIINARY PLAT FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 4375 AND 4246 BAYSIDE ROAD FILE NO. LA24-000028 WHEREAS, Steve White, (hereinafter the "Applicant") has requested approval of a subdivision of the property addressed 4375 and 4246 Bayside Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") also identified as PID's 06-117-23-12-0009 and 06-117-23-11-0003 and legally described as shown in Exhibit A: WHEREAS, on May 21, 2024, an application was filed with the City for preliminary approval of a 3-lot residential plat of the Property; and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and Subdivision Codes, on June 17, 2024, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing for the application at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning the application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on June 17, 2024 the Planning Commission reviewed the application and recommended by a vote of 7 to 0 that the City Council grant preliminary plat approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the proposal at a regular meeting held on July 8, 2024, and hereby makes the following findings with regards to this application: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File LA24-000028. 2. The Property is guided in the 2040 Orono Community Management Plan (CMP) for single family residential use, specified as Rural Residential (1 unit per 2 acres) and Rural Preserve (1 unit per 5 acres). The proposed development with single family homes is consistent with the provisions of the CMP, and is consistent with surrounding development. The Property is not located within the MUSA and will be served by septic and private water. 3. The Properties are zoned RR-lA One Family Rural Residential District (5.0 acres) north of Bayside Road. South of Bayside Road, the zoning is split between RR-1B One Family 74 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7488 Rural Residential District (2.0 acres) and LR-lA Single Family Lakeshore Residential District (2.0). 4. The proposed plat would create one new buildable lot. Lot 1, Block 2 is 21.62 acres in area and 370 feet at the OHWL. Lot 1, Block 1 is 15 acres in area and a width of 890 feet. Lot 2. Block 1 is 14.48 acres in area and a width of 660 feet. The three newly created lots are conforming to their zoning districts as it relates to area and lot width. The Property to the south of Bayside Road lies within 1,000' of Lake Minnetonka requiring conformance with the hardcover regulations of the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. The entire Property is within Hardcover Tier 1 allowing 25% impervious surface. The Properties to the north of Bayside Road are exempt from hardcover regulations. 6. No additional variances have been requested. The development of the vacant lots will be required to meet all zoning standards. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby grants Preliminary Plat Approval for a 3-lot subdivision per the Preliminary Plat survey/drawing by Mark S. Gronberg of Gronberg & Associates, Inc. dated June 28, 2024 and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to the following conditions: 1) Lot Standards. Any proposed improvements must meet all setbacks requirements of the Zoning Code. 2) Septic and Private WeII. The Properties are not located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and therefore will be served by private septic systems. The properties will also be served by individual private water supply wells. 3) Stormwater and Drainage Improvements. Final plat approval is subject to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) approval and permits as required. Final plat approval shall not be granted until the Developer has provided evidence that all required MCWD permits have been obtained. Upon building permit issuance, the property owner will be required to comply with individual lot stonnwater and erosion control management practices. 4) Drainage and Utility Easements. On the final plat, Drainage and Utility Easements shall be dedicated to the public 10' along all exterior property lines, and 5' either side of interior property lines, except such easements shall be increased to accommodate drainage where required, 75 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL No. 7488 subject to City staff approval. If applicable, Drainage Easements shall be granted over any stormwater facilities required by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District; the Drainage Easements shall be shown on the Plat. 5) Development Fees. A. Park Dedication Fee. The subdivision is subject to the standard Park Dedication Fee requirement. The Park Dedication Fee is outlined in the City's current 2024 Fee Schedule and applied to each newly created lot on a per lot basis. Park dedication fees are based on Hennepin County's assessment of the predeveloped land value. Based on the 2024 Fee Schedule, the Park Dedication Fee will be due for Lot 1, Block 2 in the amount of $3,710.81. B. Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee. The development is subject to the Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee, as established in the 2024 Fee Schedule of $16,150.00 per new lot for a 5-acre zone. The Storm Water Drainage and Trunk Fee due at the time of Final Plat for 1 new lot will be $16,150.00. 6) City Engineer Approval. Approval of the plat is subject to recommendations of City Engineer. 7) Plans and Specifications. Plans and specifications shall be submitted for review and approval by the City and other appropriate jurisdictions prior to final plat approval, to ensure that the proposed plat will accomplish the intended purposes. Final plat approval will not be granted until MCWD stormwater management plan requirements have been approved and sufficient detail is provided to meet any recommendations by the City Engineer. 8) The Preliminary Plat approval granted by this Resolution shall expire one-year from the approval date (July 8, 2025). FINAL SUBMITTALS The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Planning & Zoning Coordinator at least four (4) weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month. These submittals are as follows: 1. Record plat drawings in the form of (1) to -scale digital copy; two (2) mylar copies (one copy for the City's records and one for filing with Hennepin County); and one (1) copy reduced to 1" = 200'. Drawing to include: 76 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL No. 7488 A. Lot lines platted per preliminary plat survey/drawing by Gronberg & Associates, Inc., dated June 28, 2024 attached hereto as Exhibit B, except as modified herein. B. Dedication of Drainage and Utility Easements 10' along exterior property lines and 5' along the interior property line, with exceptions and additions as noted herein. C. Dedication of Drainage and Utility Easements over all stormwater facilities. D. Dedication of Drainage Easements over areas shown as wetlands. E. Dedication of Drainage Easements over all drainageways. F. Naming of plat. 2. Legal documents required: A. Title opinion addressed to the City or a title insurance policy in favor of the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. B. Private Driveway Easement and Maintenance Agreement. C. The Developer must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. 3. Plat approval fees to be paid: Total due: $22,910.81 A. Final plat fee: $550.00 B. Park Dedication Fee: $3,710.81 C. Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee: $16,150.00 D. Final Plat Escrow: $2,500.00 4. This Approval shall be effective until July 8, 2025 per the provisions of Zoning Code Section 82-116. If Final Plat Approval is not granted by that date, the terms and 77 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL No. 7488 conditions of this resolution shall be null and void. The City Council at its sole discretion may extend this effective period. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 8th day of July, 2024 DAZ2( I Dennis Walsh, Mayor 78 Res. 7488 Ex. A LEGAL DESCRIPTION : (4375 Bayside Rd.) Per Doc. No. 7174932 That part of the West Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian which lies Westerly of the following described line: Beginning at the Northwest corner of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 6; thence on an assumed bearing of East along the north line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 1104.0 feet to the point of beginning of the line being described; thence South 22 degrees 30 minutes West a distance of 1280.0 feet; thence South 41 degrees West a distance of 250.0 feet; thence South 19 degrees West a distance of 443.0 feet; thence on a bearing of South to the south line of said Northeast Quarter and said line there ending. EXCEPT that part thereof described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Northeast Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of East along the North line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 514 feet; thence South 27 degrees 30 minutes West a distance of 589 feet to the centerline of the County Road which extends across said Northeast Quarter; thence Northwesterly along the centerline of said County Road to the West line of said Northeast Quarter; thence Northerly along said West line to the point of beginning. ALSO EXCEPT that part of said Northeast Quarter of Section 6 described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Northeast Quarter; thence East along the North line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 514 feet to actual point of beginning; thence deflecting right 117 degrees 30 minutes a distance of 589 feet to the centerline of County Road No. 84; thence deflecting left along said centerline a distance of 180 feet; thence deflecting left 81 degrees 19 seconds a distance of 662.11 feet to a point on the North line of said Section 6; located 216.55 feet East of the point of beginning; thence West along said North line a distance of 216.55 feet to point of beginning. (4375 Bayside Rd.) Per Doc. No. A10219199 That part of the West half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian lying northerly of the centerline of Bayside Road and easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the Northwest corner of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 6; thence on an assumed bearing of East along the North line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 1104.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line being described; thence South 22 degrees 30 minutes West a distance of 1280.00 feet and said line there ending. Records of Hennepin County, MN. Abstract Property. 79 (4246 Bayside Rd.) Per Doc. No. 11204192 The West One -Half (W1/2) of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4 NE 1/4) of Section Six (6), Township 117, Range 23, according to the United States Government Survey thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 80 Res. 7488 Ex. B CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR STEVE WHITE IN THE NE 1/4 OF SEC. 6-117-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA o I wr t uocx I �rj g L / o I ---------- fia•3G do- E® I tea, ,oT D I ii'A"• • • \-6-L2'snaC E__ ; � \�\\\\ \\11D 1 � / /// IIII IIII 11// I I * i;ss.le t\)\\).\\\ \ iL_i /till /11111 1 1 en. e"x __ .\ \ g.:-"' ` °ate \\ ,\\ \ \ 1� - rri�lrl _ 1 I 1 t I o / 1 �or �c-'^�—s---��r=ti �-c a \.�`: ,\\\ \IIII ,f \ , pWETLAN De7 . (71 '(- $�+/ '/ /y I I I> � `•,mg----� ` u I +111 �OqO\ 11 1 L \\\\\\\.. I ONJC. / \ /vr \ \\ \\ ` \ ,\i �!_ / •4, /. . @y \ \\` \ / I IIII 11111 11 \\ 11\\ ♦ 1\\ \�\\\\ S \, //v 10T.1 ���IOCK- � looA . orAL -- / I \�` \�\� `\� \ \ \ * •. \,\'IIII �\� \`\\� * _ • , G/ * \\'�i , \ \ � uea. �• v / '� / r p \y\\\\ \ (4t7 RYSIDE) RR AWNIRCL / b / tya I •FT'L 1�q. Lor �`e �1\ \ \"` \ -- - WETLAND sli i -�\` : era ..,,r \`I\x e •� �`\@\ �. * \ s�\� `\ -- aL \ \ � vIL \%1� I ,•qe�" � ra„•1\� \ � \ MeD•° `"aa.' � _'$.\`lam.( i 111 \`:i�'0:2,�`��`��\\` \ I IIII �\ l; 1,-ice , / � ;\, \ ;��_; \ d.; "'W / \ , _ \`Mf•-' '' WETLANDS .\B\ he,. \ \ \ \ \ E7 . �Q , ge \ v ear H •.`:\\ \' - Tp BLQ,2 $ �I da l 18Y-- :,ms'/ es,.ez• nav a \& 9>4Qaof.I\'\,\\\\ \\ o _ J / - .,.a,,. �- `\` \�--'� // � ml III +a,\ "drri � ��_=__aXm'•�,a'' /i / 1 1 TLOT *A ��yy \ k II c. TOTAL RR-IB ` OMBINED -� o - -Jy 1 II 6LOCK 1 J _ _ __ I � � __. III+\ . ,0.6 � .\'� •b'Pz* `� Na '-LR-IA_ - n�=___ -_li I7 y'II� In. • / 1 s°'Z3'(A: ��ma.49rsr=�, \ (F�• ZOMNG_ —w yo-_ `may. 111. / • I` 0 100 200 40 : ( I' OWNER 8: SUMMER : ro1i •� S C A L E I N F E E T Steven C. White \ + I ( (\I Y\ ' Orono MN 135359 d 2eninq LR-IA RR-1B k RR-1A TOtd re a 53.07. Au clud;n9 Dayaida Road Totd dry crea 41.17_ Ac excluding Bayiad. Road a \ \ uc (oxw T LEGAL DESCRIPTION \wP LAKE P (0375 Bay"" Rd' Doc. No. 7174932 \ Thol a t f the West Half of the Northeast Quarlef of Section 6, Towtnhip 117 North Range 23 West f the 5th Principd Meridian which lies We fatly of the following described line: Beoginni t the Northwest eo of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 6; thence on MINNETONKA InNg a bearing f Eaet long hl north line f > Northeast Ouorter a distance of 1104.0 teat td the point of begin ing of the linen being described; thence South 22 degrees 3D minutes West distance of 1280.0 feet: Nance South 41 do race West distanee f 250.0 feet: thence South 19 tlegrem Wml a distanee o/ 443.0 feel: thence on o bearing of South to the south line of said Northeast Quarter NORTH ARM and said line there ending. EXCEPT tlwt port thereof described folows Baginninga at the Northwmt o n o/ laid Northeast Quarter, thanes ad bearingg f t East to longthe North line f said Northeast Quarter tlialonce / 514 feet• thanca South 27 degrees 30 "'nutea West as distance o1 589 feet to the Centsdine of the Count Road hick land, across did Northe..t Quarter, thence Northweatarlyo along the centerline of said or County Road to the Weal line of a d Northeast Quartar; thence Northerly along said West line to the point f beginning " ALSO EXCEPT that port of id Northeast Ouartar of Section 6 date fib as follows: Beginning a< the Northwest car er f said Northedat Quarter; thence Eaat along the North line of tl Northeast Ouorter tlialonce f 514 feet to actual point of beginning; thence de0eetinq fight 117 degrees 30 ute, a distance f 589 feet to the ca lerfne of County R,-d No. 84• thence del, ling left long s id c ,'Ic ne o WETLAND 1 $ distance f 180 feet' thanca daRacting left 81 degrees 19 nds a distal,ca f 66211 feet to pp ' t Na North line /said Section 6; rx_ A< located 21655 feet East of the point dl beginning; thence West along said North line a distance of 21655 feet to point of beginning, $$ h1375 Bayaida Ro19199 Q FP Doe. No. A10 x� That part f the West half o1 the Northeast Quarter f Section S. Tdwmhip 111 North, Range 23 West 1 the 5th Princrin I Maridlon lying rtharlyo f the Bent-riine f Bayside Road antl tarty of line following described line: Commencing at the Northwest car par f the Nortgemt Quarter f said Section 6; thane. on n o umed abearmg of Emt long the North line / a fill Northeast Mortar dBtanae of 1104.00 feet to the ^dint of beginning f the line being described; thence South 22 degrees 3D minutes West a distance rt r , di t foot and said line there a ding. Records f Hennepin County, MN. Abstract Property. or e246 Bay,lde Rad Doc. No. 112�4192 Thd West One -Hall (W1/2) 1 the Norttheo,t Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4 NE 1/4) of Section Six (6), Township 117, Range 23, acco,ding to the United States Government Survey thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. o . dents, iron marker at • . denotes iron marker found o : denotes Hennepin County monument found as : denotes Hennepin County right-of-way monument found _ (QmZ) : denotes existing spot elevation, ..an sae level datum �,iyas �� In-xs--91r--: denotes existing contour line, per county maps --- Bearings shown are based upon the H—opin County coordinate datu. e9.5g' iS" W 2g1.t2--'� m This a y intends to show the boundaries of the be,, described property, nd the location of two existing buildings, spot elevations. lopogrephy par my map,. and edge f wetlands a delineated by others. and the propoaetl location o(a prapoaad lot line Narean. It doe, not pwport to show any other improvements or enttoachments. hereby g'sp;,aifyy Witthis ,mg'•a yes «'^i pei 1npa.rt PROJECT GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC ma nr°t dwy ueeme•d LmM Swgar urM^ eM po IMCLAND SURVEYORS, LAND PLANNEIL4 MSlate of MI toftTHWLOW DMVE LONG LAKE, MN 55356 6. r—N, ennln a en N-ar ,)755952--473-4141 81 TRAIL EASEMENT AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") made effective this ' Day of -Zey" 2025, by Steven C. White and Patricia L. H. White, husband and wite (` Grano " in f CITY OF ORONO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("Grantee"). ), n favor of the WITNESSETH, that Grantor, in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration given by Grantee, the receipt of which is acknowledged by Grantee, does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey to Grantee, its successors and assigns, a perpetual easement for public ingress, egress and access for trail purposes and uses, including the right to construct and maintain the same, together with the right of the public for access over, above, under and across the land located in Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: An easement for trail purposes over, under and across the southerly 12 feet of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, BOBWHITE MEADOWS and the Northerly 12 feet of Lot 1, Block 2, BOBWHITE MEADOWS, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "Easement Area"): including, but not by way of limitation, a full and free right and authority to enter upon the Easement Area to construct, install, maintain, operate and repair a gravel or paved trail and any and all appurtenances incidental and related thereto (all of which are hereinafter referred to collectively as the "Improvements). Grantee shall have the right to make use of the Easement Area as is reasonably necessary and advisable for the construction, installation, maintenance, operation and repair of the Improvements. In addition to any other remedy Grantee may have, the covenants and restrictions contained herein may be enforced by injunction. Grantor covenants that it is in fee title to the Easement Area, has a lawful right and authority to convey and grant this easement, and that the Easement Area is free from all encumbrances that could adversely affect the easement rights granted herein, except any encumbrance the holder has consented to this Agreement. W, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed this Agreement on the day and year set forth above. GRANTOR: STEVEN C. WHITE B Z-w/ _ Y PATRICIA L. H. WHITE By ?0-�- - The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2$ day of yca4t'*HLj , by Steven C. Alex Martin Rivera Notary Public Maricopa County, Arizona MY Comm. Expires 09-05-28 Commission No. 674006 INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. 445 North Willow Drive Long Lake, MN 55356 Telephone 952-473-4141 White and Patricia L. H. White. NOTARY PU IC 9.AJtPA 83 AGENDA ITEM Date: March 10, 2025 Item: 15 Title: LA24-000065, 980 Heritage Lane, Conditional Use Permit - Resolution 7561 Presenter: Matt Karney, Planner Section: Consent Agenda Purpose: The applicant requests a conditional use permit for new retaining walls within the lakeshore setback. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline: The application was made on December 3, 2024 and deemed complete on February 4, 2025. Following the 60-day review period this application expires on April 5, 2025. 3. Background: The applicant proposes a new retaining wall to allow for a level access point to an existing lake stair with railings, within 75 feet of the Ordinary High Water Level of Tanager Lake. Currently, the land near the stair access is sloped and not level with the wooden landing of the stairs making it challenging to access the stairs. The new retaining wall is minimal is size and will allow the area to align with the lake stairs. Link to Planning Commission Packet. 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment: On February 18, 2025, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and discussed the requested conditional use permit. Following the public hearing, the Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the conditional use permit as recommended by staff. Link to Planning Commission Video. Public Comment: No public comments have been received. 6. Staff Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Council should move to adopt Resolution 7561. Exhibits A. Resolution 7561 B. Site Plan & Wall Details C. Draft PC Minutes 84 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7561 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PURSUANT TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-1279 FILE NO. LA24-000065 WHEREAS, on December 3, 2024, on behalf of the owner, Carlos J Correa Oppenheimer (hereinafter the "Owner"), a representative from the Hartman Companies (hereinafter the "Applicant"), applied for a conditional use permit in accordance with the City Code for the property addressed 980 Heritage Lane and legally described as: Lot 2, Tanager Estates, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Applicant made an application to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit pursuant to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to construct a new retaining wall within the lakeshore setback; and WHEREAS, on February 18, 2025, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on February 18, 2025, the Planning Commission voted 7 to 0 in favor of a motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit as recommended by staff; and WHEREAS, on March 10, 2025, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves a conditional use permit to construct a new retaining wall within the lakeshore setback and described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: Al. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above -mentioned meetings, and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 85 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7561 A2. The Property is located in the LR-1A (One -Family Lakeshore Residential) Zoning District. A3. The lakeside slope on the Property is not defined as a Bluff. A4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. The Applicant proposes 18.8% total site hardcover. A5. The Applicant requests a conditional use permit to construct a new retaining wall within the lakeshore setback to support a permitted lake access stair. A6. In considering this application for a conditional use permit, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed conditional use permit upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ANALYSIS: The City Council may approve a conditional use permit for the construction of retaining walls as long as the walls are: B1. Designed to correct an established erosion problem; the proposed retaining wall will provide slope stability in the area around the stair landing. Repeated access to the lake stair over time may cause erosion in the future if left in its present condition. This criterion is met; and B2. Suitable given the demonstrated need; the proposed retaining wall is suitable as the walls are minimal to provide safe access within the excessive slope leading to the stair landing. This criterion is met; and B3. Designed by a registered engineer or landscape architect, depending on the project scope; the proposed retaining walls were designed by a professional landscaping company but certifications were not provided with the submittal. Staff finds the proposal to have a minimal scope given the size of the proposed wall. This criterion is met; and B4. Designed to be the minimum size necessary to control the erosion problem; the proposed retaining wall is designed to be minimal and will provide safe, level access to the existing lake stair from the lakeyard. This criterion is met. 86 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7561 Based on the application and the evidence submitted, the Council finds that the proposed use at the proposed location is or will be: B5. Consistent with the community management plan; the new retaining wall will provide slope stability and safe lake access for the Owner of the Property, an aspect that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and B6. Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; retaining walls within the lakeyard are permitted where they are deemed necessary to protect the integrity of the slope. The existing lake stair is sited poorly into the slope and the proposed wall would allow for a level connection between the slope and stairs; and B7. Adequately served by police, fire, roads, and stormwater management; the Property meets this standard; and B8. Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; the Property meets this standard; and B9. Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; this proposal is not anticipated to impact public services; and B10. Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future; the proposal to add a retaining wall is compatible with the surrounding area both presently and in the future, as the need for lake access for private property owners is not specific to the Property; and B11. Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; the installation of a new retaining wall to support an existing lake stair is consistent with the character of the surrounding area; and B12. Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; the retaining walls are proposed to be minimal in nature to provide a level entry to the lake stair with a less than two (2) foot tall protrusion above the slope; and B13. Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; the improvements to the deck 87 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7561 and retaining walls should not create an adverse impact on properties in the neighborhood; and B14. Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses; the Applicant has provided a landscape plan that shows the walls will be adequately screened; and B15. Not create a nuisance that generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other means; the proposal is not anticipated to create a nuisance; and B16. Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access; the proposal is not anticipated to create excessive traffic burdens on the nearby road network; and B17. Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; the proposed retaining wall appears to be the minimum size necessary to ensure a safe and level access to the lake stair and provide a natural stone color in the exposed area; and B18. All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts; the proposal does not include the installation of any exterior lighting; and B19. Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare; the proposal does not come at a detriment to the public health, safety, or welfare of residents and landowners of the City of Orono. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit pursuant to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow construction of a new retaining wall within the lakeshore setback. C1. Council approval is based on the entire record and, the above Findings. C2. The approved project shall conform to the site plan and wall design dated February 17, 2025, submitted by the Applicant, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. 88 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7561 C3. Any amendments to the plans that are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. C4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Owner, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the proposed retaining wall and commencing construction of said project. A building permit must be obtained within one year of the date of Council approval, or the conditional use permit will expire on that date (March 10, 2026). C5. The Applicant agrees to comply with all permitting requirements of all applicable jurisdictions including but not limited to Hennepin County, MCWD, and LMCD. Copies of all required permits must be provided to the City with the submittal materials for the administrative building permit for the retaining wall. C6. The conditional use permit shall remain in effect as long as the conditions imposed by the City Council are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. C7. The undersigned Owner agrees to the conditions herein. C8. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 10th day of March, 2025. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: Christine Lusian, City Clerk Bob Tunheim, Mayor 89 Carlos J Correa Oppenheimer, Property Owner or C & K PROPERTIES STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7561 Daniella Rodriguez, Property Owner This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 12025 by Carlos J Correa Oppenheimer, husband of Daniella Rodriguez. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 12025 by Daniella Rodriguez, wife of Carlos J Correa Oppenheimer. Notary Public •v 90 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7561 Happy Times, Inc A Minnesota Corporation By: it's STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN (insert title**) This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20, by the (insert title**) of Happy Times, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public **Titles could be: "President" or "Vice President" or "Chief Financial Officer" 91 N O) Existing Site Condition Property Line RAIN GARDEN clel / 37.5 SCREEN PORCH / 0 TANAGER LAKE RESIDENCE PORCH Existing Site Condition TERRACE F PORCH Scale: I" = 20'-0" Proposed Work Area - Wall Sod- Exist. - - ' Deck' WY W W W OI 41I \ / / W W W W W W W W W W W Y W W W I II/ I Y W W W W / Proposed \' _ _ _ _ - ' ' (2) Prairie Dropseed Retain i n (1) Little B l u est*m ' g / Wa I I TANAGER LAKE Scale:1/4" =1A" Existing Site Condition 0 Exist. Dock 8099 BAVARIA ROAD VICTORIA, MN 55386 NV W 00) Z LO 0 �z Z O U p 0 Q 0) 0 U Q O m 0 z J U REVISIONS: DATE: 02.04.2025 SCALE: Varies SHEET: 18"X24" DESIGNER: David M. Anderson Seth Eggert SHEET: Overall Site Plan N ONE 1 OF 2 M O� Proposed Work Area - Wall ..I._1_J�! Proposed Wall Material - Techo-Bloc G-Force C-FORCE DESCRkPTION' Wall TEXTURE. Smooth Speci#ications per pallet imperial Metric Dimension Front L�.xnxHi 18 x 11 %-X 8 -457 x 290 x 203 ft ❑imens bnBack LxaxH) 8%x1131wx8 219x290x203 32-00 ft2 2,97 rn2 Cubing 32 units � pallet 48 lim ft 14.63 lin. n1 Approx. Weight 2 477 lbs 1 124 kg Number o1 roves 4 Coverage pef raw 6.00 W 0_74 rn2 Line-ar coverage per row 12.00 [in. it 3.881in. rn Cross Section per Manufacturer (Techo-Bloc A B -n I' E — K — L -- M GRAVITY WALL DETAIL A. CAP FROM TECHO-BLOC B. D-FORCE BLOCK FROM TEDH0,BLOC C. WALL INCLINATION (3.9¢) D. EXPOSED HEIGHT E. HIDPE VERTICAL KEY F. EMBEDMENT DEPTH G. TO P SO I L H. LOW PE RM EAS I LFFY SO I L J. n/4" (20 MM) CLEAN NONE 8099 BAVARIA ROAD VICTORIA, MN 55386 W� V/ L.L 0) Z 4-0 �LO 0 Z U -1 Z U =o 0 ° 0 00 00 0)0 N Q U m Q w J U REVISIONS: DATE: 02.04.2025 SCALE: Varies SHEET: 18"X24" DESIGNER: David M. Anderson Seth Eggert SHEET: A(!N Wall Details TWO 2OF2 Existing Site Condition Property Line RAIN GARDEN clel / 37.5 SCREEN PORCH / 0 TANAGER LAKE RESIDENCE PORCH Existing Site Condition TERRACE F PORCH Scale: I" = 20'-0" Proposed Work Area - Wall Sod- Exist. - - ' Deck' WY W W W OI 41I \ / / W W W W W W W W W W W Y W W W I II/ I Y W W W W / Proposed \' _ _ _ _ - ' ' (2) Prairie Dropseed Retain i n (1) Little B l u est*m ' g / Wa I I TANAGER LAKE Scale:1/4" =1A" Existing Site Condition 0 Exist. Dock 8099 BAVARIA ROAD VICTORIA, MN 55386 NV W 00) Z LO 0 �z Z O U p 0 Q 0) 0 U Q O m 0 z J U REVISIONS: DATE: 02.04.2025 SCALE: Varies SHEET: 18"X24" DESIGNER: David M. Anderson Seth Eggert SHEET: Overall Site Plan N ONE 1 OF 2 LO rn Proposed Work Area - Wall ..I._1_J�! Proposed Wall Material - Techo-Bloc G-Force C-FORCE DESCRkPTION' Wall TEXTURE. Smooth Speci#ications per pallet imperial Metric Dimension Front L�.xnxHi 18 x 11 %-X 8 -457 x 290 x 203 ft ❑imens bnBack LxaxH) 8%x1131wx8 219x290x203 32-00 ft2 2,97 rn2 Cubing 32 units � pallet 48 lim ft 14.63 lin. n1 Approx. Weight 2 477 lbs 1 124 kg Number o1 roves 4 Coverage pef raw 6.00 W 0_74 rn2 Line-ar coverage per row 12.00 [in. it 3.881in. rn Cross Section per Manufacturer (Techo-Bloc A B -n I' E — K — L -- M GRAVITY WALL DETAIL A. CAP FROM TECHO-BLOC B. D-FORCE BLOCK FROM TEDH0,BLOC C. WALL INCLINATION (3.9¢) D. EXPOSED HEIGHT E. HIDPE VERTICAL KEY F. EMBEDMENT DEPTH G. TO P SO I L H. LOW PE RM EAS I LFFY SO I L J. n/4" (20 MM) CLEAN NONE 8099 BAVARIA ROAD VICTORIA, MN 55386 W� V/ L.L 0) Z 4-0 �LO 0 Z U -1 Z U =o 0 ° 0 00 00 0)0 N Q U m Q w J U REVISIONS: DATE: 02.04.2025 SCALE: Varies SHEET: 18"X24" DESIGNER: David M. Anderson Seth Eggert SHEET: A(!N Wall Details TWO 2OF2 DRAFT Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 18, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 6.3 LA24-000065, HARTMAN COMPANIES, 980 HERITAGE LANE, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and approve a request for a conditional use permit for a retaining wall about 28 feet from the lake. The applicant provided an updated landscape plan that would screen the proposed walls from the lake. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff. The applicant, Seth Eggert, Hartman Companies, was present. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 8:41 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 8:41 p.m. Commissioners said the request met the requirements for the conditional use permit. Kirchner moved, Ressler seconded, to approve LA24-000065 as applied with the proposed screening of the walls, 980 Heritage Lane, Conditional Use Permit. VOTE: Ayes: 7, Nays 0. 96 AGENDA ITEM Date: March 10, 2025 Item: 16 Title: LA25-000008, 2475 Kelley Parkway, Final Master Development Plan - 5th Extension - Resolution 7569 Presenter: Laura Oakden, Community Development Director Section: Consent Agenda Purpose: To grant an extension to the final Master Development Plan approval for the 56 unit apartment building at 2475 Kelley Parkway. 2. Background: In April, 2020, the City Council approved the final Master Development Plan which was the final step in the approval necessary to facilitate construction of the 56 unit 2 1/2 story apartment building on a vacant lot at 2475 Kelley Parkway immediately east of the Orono Dentist office. The Resolution of approval included the statement: The approvals granted by this resolution nun with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A building permit for the principal building shall be obtained within one year of the date of Council approval, if no permit is issued or extension granted by the City Council, the City Council may declare the approvals granted within this resolution as null and void on that date (April 13, 2021). Staff granted a 1-year administrative extension until April 13, 2022. On January 24, 2022 the City Council granted an extension (Resolution 7248) until April 13, 2023. On March 21, 2023 a third extension was granted until April 13, 2024. On March 11, 2024 a forth extension was granted until April 13, 2025 The applicant has requested an additional 1-year extension which would end April 13, 2026 if approved. The City Code does not limit the number of extensions allowed. The applicant has submitted a letter included as Exhibit B. Previously, in previous extension requests the applicant stated that the covid pandemic was a large cause of the delay over the past few years. The applicant is stating they intent to pull a building permit this spring (2025) as they are actively working to secure financing for the project. 3. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the Council approve a 12-month extension to April 13, 2026. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve resolution 7569 granting a 1 year extension for the Orono Apartment project at 2475 Kelley Parkway. Exhibits A, LA25-00008, 2475 Kelley Parkway, 5rd Extension, Resolution 7569 B. Narrative, Orono Apartments C. LA20-000001, 2475 Kelley Parkway, Orono Apartments Approval, Resolution 7085 97 98 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7569 A RESOLUTION GRANTING AN EXTENSION TO RPUD MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL FOR ORONO APARTMENTS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NO. 17 (LA20-000001) FILE NO. LA25-000008 WHEREAS, the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter "City Council") adopted land development regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, Orono Apartments LLC is the owner (hereinafter the "Owner") of the property at 2745 Kelley Parkway, legally described at Lot 1, Block 2, City of Orono Addition (hereinafter the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the City Council granted a Master Development Plan approval, LA20-000001, for the proposed 56 unit apartment building via Resolution 7085, which had an original expiration date of April 13, 2021; and WHEREAS, City Staff granted a one year extension until April 13, 2022; and WHEREAS, on January 7, 2022, the City Council granted the Owner's second request for an extension to April 13, 2023; and WHEREAS, on March 21, 2023, the City Council granted the Owner's third request for an extension to April 13, 2024; and WHEREAS, on March 11, 2024, due to issues related to supply chain of material and financing, the Owner request a fourth Master Development Plan approval extension to April 13, 2025. WHEREAS, on March 10, 2025, the City Council granted the Owner's fifth request for an extension to April 13, 2026; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Orono does hereby grant a 4rd extension for Master Development Plan Approval for PUD No. 17, to expire April 13, 2026 unless a building permit has been obtained. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 10st day of March, 2025. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: 99 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7569 Christine Lusian, City Clerk Bob Tunheim, Mayor 100 O p d EL archltocta & piannora PO Box 437, Waverly, MN 55399 3 March 2025 ORONO APARTMENTS, LLC KELLEY PARKWAY To: Orono Council We are asking for an extension of time to apply for a full building permit. This project was approved in 2019. The project meets all zoning requirements and was approved with no variances. The owner (John Patch) owns the land. Construction documents have been completed. At the time of completion of those document COVID was in full bloom causing construction materials to skyrocket in cost along with supply chain issues. As the material costs have leveled off the interest rates have gone up. Mr. Patch is committed to building this project as soon as interest rates drop slightly. Construction of this project will complete the development of this block. And it follows the direction called out by the Comprehensive Plan by placing higher density housing along the (old) Highway 12 corridor. Following is a summary of the details of the project. I will be attending the Council Meeting to address any questions you might have regarding the project. GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project is a two-story building with partially subgrade parking which meets or exceeds all setback requirements and meets the 30 foot height requirement. The project tabulation is as follows; SITE AREA BUILDING FOOTPRINT SURFACE PARKING AREA TOTAL HARD COVER TOTAL GREEN SPACE TOTAL BUILDING AREA: FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR ROOF LEVEL TOTAL FLOOR AREA RATIO 111,310 SF (2.55 ACRES) 31,784 SF 29,614 SF (27,788+1688+140) 61,385 SF (55%) 49,925 SF (45%) 31,742 SF 31,742 SF 5,236 SF 68,720 SF .61 APARTMENT UNITS: 101 2 BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM + DEN 1 BEDROOM TOTAL UNITS PARKING PROVIDED: ENCLOSED NEW SURFACE TOTALAPARTMENT SHARED PARKING TOTAL ON SITE DENSITY: SITE AREA NUMBER OF UNITS 16 @ 1100 — 1200 SF 29% 24 @ 900 — 1000 SF 42% 16 @ 700 — 850 SF 29% 56 73 SPACES (1.5 SPACES/UNIT) 40 SPACES 113 SPACES (2.01 SPACES/UNIT) 14 SPACES 127 SPACES (2.26 SPACES/UNIT) NUMBER OF BEDROOMS I_VI4ZT-,W4+9rA**1&11011&1 2.55 ACRES 56 UNITS 21.9 UNITS/ACRE 72 BEDROOMS (2X16 +24+16) 28.2 BEDROOMS/ACRE 4 , &19 By comparison the Stonebay Condos at 2670 Kelley Parkway the numbers are: Site area 125,242 sf 2.87 acres Number of units 57 condos (19.9 units/acre) Number of bedrooms 114 bedrooms (39.7 bedrooms/acre) (all units are 2 Bedroom units) Average unit size 1800 sf (smallest unit is 1500sf and largest is 2100 sf) SUMMARY POINTS: We are limited in the ability of put the garage level totally underground by existing groundwater conditions. The project meets all setback requirements and height requirements. 1. Market Rate Rental Housing There is a high demand in the area for high quality market rate rental housing. There currently are no rental options in the area of this quality. A full range of available housing provides Orono residents a needed option which would allow them to remain in the community when looking for housing. 2. Density Evaluation The density of this project compares favorably with the Stonebay condo project. Orono Apartments density is 21.9 units/acre while the Stonebay project is19.9 units/acre. While units per acre is one measure of density other factors are worth taking into account. In addition to being similar in units per acre, Orono Apartments are averaging just over half the physical size of the Stonebay project. Orono Apartments average 964 sf in area. Stonebay units average approximately 1,800 sf 102 When comparing the density of bedrooms Orono Apartments are at 28.2 Bedrooms/acre while Stonebay Condos are at 39.7 Bedrooms/acre. The number of bedrooms generate residents and car traffic. Both size of units and bedroom density are measures that effect the impact of the project on the site. And both are significantly reduced on our site. 3. Building Massing The project is designed to have a height of 30' (average of roof slope). The highpoint of the Orono Apartments is 14'2" LOWER than the highpoint of the Stonebay condos. We are also comparable in height to the Orono Senior Housing Community on the adjacent site to the East of our site. This project fits well into the community physically while meeting the needs of the community in general by providing market rate rental housing in an area that has a great need for this type of housing. The final hard cover calculations show a hardcover of 55% which means that we have 45% green space. The previous plan approved on this site (Phase II of the medical office proposal) had a hard cover of 71.14% thus leaving a green space of 28.86%. We have therefore decreased the hard cover by 16.14%. Therefore, storm water runoff has been decreased from the previous project. Neil Weber, AIA Weber Architects & Planners 103 Doc No A10789440 Certified, filed and/or recorded on May 21, 2020 8:59 AM Office of the County Recorder Hennepin County, Minnesota Martin McCormick, County Recorder Mark Chapin, County Auditor and Treasurer Deputy 158 Pkg ID 1993239E Document Recording Fee $46.00 Document Total This cover sheet is now a permanent part of the recorded document. $46,00 104 CITY OF O RONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7085 A RESOLUTION GRANTING RPUD MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL FOR ORONO APARTMENTS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NO. 17 FILE #20-000001 WHEREAS, the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Stale of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter "City Council") has adopted land development regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and ~ WHEREAS, Orono Apartments LLC is the owner (Hereinafter the "Ownee) of the property at 2745 Kelley Parkway, legally described at Lot 1, Block 2, City of Orono Addition (hereinafter the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application by the Owner for rezoning of the Property to RPUD - Residential Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, on May 14, 2018 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 6869 granting General Concept Plan Approval for the proposed development, which includes the following elements: I. Conditional Rezoning of the Property from RR- 1B Single Family Rural Residential District to RPUD Residential Planned Unit Development District; ?. Conditional approval ofa land use amendment changing the prescribed densityfrom commercial to High Density Residential WHEREAS, on June 27, 2019, the Metropolitan Council approved the Land Use change to High Density residential, and WHEREAS, on January 2, 2020, the Developer filed a formal application for Master Development Plan Approval for a 56 unit apartment building, WHEREAS, City Staff and consultants have reviewed the final plans and hereby approve each and identify them as part of the official record for PUD 17. WHEREAS, the Developer has completed or has agreed to complete all other reg111rements of the Zoning Code and related Ordinances of the City including; Page i 105 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7085 1. Completion of and adherence to all requirements and conditions of Resolution No. 6869, ?. Dedication of Drainage and Utility Easements, 3. Dedication of Trail Easement, 4. Receipt of a Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) permit approving the grading and stormwater management facilities plan for the development of the Property as proposed per the approved Grading, Drainage and SWPP Plan as noted herein, 5. FDire Department Comments, 6. City Engineer comments dated January 23, 2020, 7. Payment to the City of the following, utility fees: a. Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Tees Res.>4 units 1 acre: $8,490f acre x 2.55 acres = $21,649.00 h. Water Connection Charges 59 SAC units* x $4,3701 unit = 257,830.00 c. Sanitary Sewer Connection Charge 59 SAC units* x $5,3801 unit = $317,420.00 d. Met Council's SAC fees 59 SAC* units x $2,4851 unit = $146,615.00 $743,514.00 *SAC units determined by the Metropolitan Council on December 4, 2019, 8. Payment of a private recreation fee in the amount of $139,750 as established in General Concept Plan Approval Resolution No. 6869 and in lieu of providing 10% of the project for private recreation. and WHEREAS, City staff and consultants have reviewed the plans for this PUD application and hereby specify approval of each attached plan and identify them as part of the official record for PUD No. 17: 1. Approval of building plans prepared by Weber Architects and Planners dated April 3, 2020. 2. Approval of Survey and site plans prepared by Gronberg and Associates dated March 16, 2018 and updated periodically, most recently March 22, 2019. 3. Approval of Landscape Plan prepared by Otten Bros, dated March 20, 2020. Page 2 106 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 7 08 5 NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that based on the findings of Resolution No. 6869, the City Council of the City of Orono does hereby grant Master Development Plan Approval for PLJ❑ No. 17, subject to the following conditions: 1. General Development Plan Approval is granted subject to conditions established within Resolution No. 6869. ?. Upon approval of this resolution, the City Council directs staff to amend the Zoning Map, changing the zoning designation for the subject parcel from B-6 PUD to RPUD. 3. Plans shall be substantively as shown on building plans provided as Exhibit A and Site Plans provided as Exhibit B. 4. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit for any permanent improvement on the site, the Owner shall: a. Execute the Trail and Drainage and Utility Easements. (Exhibit C and D) b. Execute the Escrow Agreement. ( Exhibit E) c. Execute Restrictive Covenants. (Exhibit F) d. Pay utility and private recreation fees as enumerated above. e. Provide a Letter of Credit or other security in the form acceptable to Staff for the amount approved by the City for the completion of the landscaping as shown on the approved landscape plan. (Exhibit G) f. Provide a photometric plan showing no measurable light leaving the site at the property line. 5. Any substantive changes shall be recorded as amendments to the recorded copy of the final development plan. 6. Signage shall be limited to the following: a. A maximum of one monument sign 8 feet high, 4 square feet of text, 16 square feet in area. b. Two building wall signs, a maximum of50 square feet each, located on either the north or south wall of the structure. Changeable copy of any type is not permitted 7. Any exterior mechanical units (air conditioning, air exchangers, etc.) shall be placed on the ground or screened by a wall structure. Those placed on the ground shall be screened with fencing and landscaping, their location approved by staff. An electrical transformer, should one be installed, will need to be screened/ softened with landscaping, approved by staff. 8. The approvals granted by this resolution runs with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of' said project. A building permit for the principal building shall be Page 3 107 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCiI_ ICI O. 7 0 8 5 obtained within one year of'the date of Council approval, if not permit is issued or extent ion granted by the City Council, the City Council may declare the approvals granted within this resolution as null and void on that date (April 13, 2021). 9. The approvals granted in this Resolution sliall become effective only when all conditions of approval requiring actions by the Developer have been satisfied. Adopted by the City Council of Orono this D"' day of April, 2020. ATTEST: an, - Dina Carlson, City Clerk Owner Dennis Walsh, Mayor Page ,_ 108 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7 0 8 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 11 day of I' 2020 by Dennis Walsh, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and sad instrument was executed on behalf of the City. L)'4� -&I= Notary Public �L a ANN'+CAR STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of r 1 2020 by Anna Carlson, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. r4 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Nola J. Dickhausan Notary Public Minnesota Commum Expires January 31, 2022 This instrument was acknowledged before me on this t 344" day of Met , 2020 by :SC�1ny��cz _. , the pw0jr--yt of Orono Apartments, I-C., a Minnesota Limited Liability corporation, on behalf of the corporation. S ' hi LF.1:.�4•'. DES F 1!. N(' AAVPUS1-iC-PAIiiXE,'A,A , Con" rl: ,kno !- .Ore-, Jan, 31, 2023 i rNs"M9011 Notary Public 1.110--'a - Page 5 109 Exhibit A— Building Plans Exhibit B — Site Plan Exhibit C — Trail Easement Exhibit ❑ — Drainage and Utility Easement Exhibit E — Escrow Agreement Exhibit F — Restrictive Covenants Exhibit G — Landscape plan CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL N0. 7085 Page 6 110 ORONO APARTMENTS 2745 KELLEY PARKWAY ORONO, MN 55356 pqPR��OJECT F£SM Imq O�O.yO Y�iNtM1 u[ ORONO APARTMENTS s-.sxn�n A706 VANNG$. VIEW I FRONT BAC W SOUTH VIEW LEFT! WEST VIEW 7085 .rur..ens, uc ORONO APARTMENTS RIGKT� EAST VIEW A100J 3 N KELLEY PARKWAY P - _ -�- s � , ORONORPARTMENTS ' T l- I i f-fir i t ■ rrrll� IrI a 11 i.n lira �nln�nEl�ia nII ubI InI nrrlr n�Iu� a— 7085 �w.r,�.11� w�.UlnrFx rr�;n, SITE NOTES S0� i N*i SXON nrP w..:•..., .w:sso, 1 1 RETAINING WALL �RONO APARTMENTS LJ The retaining well as shovm on pWn this plan and landscape plan ranges in height from 1 foot to 5 feeL The subcontractor buiWing the well shall submil engineered shop drawings ,ss]5 orwo, for approval prior to construction. [ a , SITE SIGN A single site plan will be eonsWcted as per atlached draw ng• [ 3 ] SITE L lOK71NG �! Tw double pates o111ghting on 12' Wes vAll be added. Lighung will not extend beyond the entrance area. Shop drawings vAll he SUbrnitted for staff approval prior to Installallon as su ooantractor has not "el been selected, { ; t FUTURE CONNECTION TO SOUTH TRAIL �! Al the time of construction of the Ira it along Wayzata Blvd a connection from the parking area wit be completed, TRASH ENCLOSURE '(f Exilktg trash enclosure to remain and 1v be screened as per landscape plan, iT•. Tit is enclosure Is for use by the existing medics! bullding" Trash for apartments will be handled internally in the parking area. .--. A7t7t}.1.5 7085 ORONO APARTMENTS orwn r � I ! I � it - --I �_--- 115 a 0¢ llllj?�i 116 T�85 4 lii 11 1 Rill lilil Nl �1 �i ®9 ��• VA alSl 0 �A��l�� ���AI a Ili ���=il,ti ►� ��� I I MIMI WON ra cv - II II ill Ij I' Ij jj II Ijl Ij v,. �:It II li ji --- ---- -- ------- -- ----�- ..------- -- --- i f jl j f I� �� ._.,. •l I _'j-- - -=7� -- --- - -- - - - --- - - - ---- jl I I j jj ji _ i J' � � ! i UNIT 2 361 UN17 10 302 UNIT 1a 303 UNIT 2 .. - -----=� J ---- ' -_t - --------------- - - - - - -- - - - - --- - -- I1 (� Bs 83 B� ` LEVER J7 J2 Nt 7085 jl -----, � --ram o.a..v .ra���TMcuc ORONO jAPARTMENTS ���Af0a 3 3 CD I . I =MGM y jigs 0-M 119 120 LO co a II _Lu02 `2r- --'-- ---- --- � — -- — - --- - -- ------- -- --- I it 1 I i it I I I -- , -` -�---�--------I - - - - -- - --� r r i I I l i u Iv I I I I I i 1 i I II I I I I I I r I I I I I I I II I I I I i I II I I I I II I j I I r I —_—_—_— 1 ! it i - �e- I I , I I I r i I I I li II I i I I I I I I I � I - - --- o-- - _- --__- ------ ----- --- --= W _ r i ii i F 121 to co C=) N.- ItU 122 Lr) ov O 1{ LJ 1� }I I lRArBI�E �Sl' rill '.IlElllp• _IEt4 ;iri.'�E� �ilim EiE! iNN I!S' 11 11 l! i d�ll:7 Y VDU �n__�i I ■ ■" nu �Inir'l ie I,!liil{E+lifi�!� I`l111V'II!illli1lI11E .. 'i1SSll I'I•.l:=:!Il �?sill a �iE aflRl IIIIII�IIH�t�I� �1M1�6 l�l*ifllil`f 1sli ='aCinmmimi �:naeanm: �h I 123 co A� 1 Yy E NI 124 94 9- 7a1La1�2lammaLI C4.1 MUMMI EMIMPI- 1 r�� --44`" 7085 ORONO APARTMENTS �r.swwur ssa,a�' .. Aa00 L5 1' I A,G n I I i ! I I 7085 w na„ ORONO APARTMENTS xH 5f2la ;w A401 AP;;-r'XF'NTS A402 ��'.�-i1�LsppL try .xw r J1.y� J2 II=31=11=11?EE=li=1L=1L=1C=11?Il=1f. 11= IIaA=11= IE=II-11= II 11=P=EI=II=1}=11 .il=lf=31=11�6=}f= 31IIjll=31--IIdfE=11= 4 T4 7 08 5 oum¢ r.nrs uc .ut�ur Wk Wei ORONO APARTMENTS r.e�ww.�r 3 N co ;aza o� I I I 1q LG- a- 1 I I I I B - 1I - �' I - ---� - --0 I - - ---- --0 v 129 mlf� �a� cl[ �`n I IIEo iJtil �! IIw l 1-A=11=11=] r=II=11=1k 70804 6 .... O— Room ORONO APARTMENTS o-- s A502 00 F I a lie mile jl—R. small 133 CITY OF KELLEY PARKWAY - --- - -- S 89' 15' 26" E . s...w..»: _—______ ORONO ADDITION n r, 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY FOR WEBER ARCHITECTS OF LOT 1, BLOCK 2, CITY OF ORONO ADDITION HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ______.— �______�.,r� � I� I Lei � I n I I I OUTLOT D ' I 0 I I iw° I v r t:at= ,--'-- 89°15'28" W ,tea l 377.35 inn -�•- --- ---- J' - -.w n H.C.S.A.H. NO. 112 WAYZATA BLVD. W. 9801 01 UCAL OESWPT*N Or 1 WE5 l.et ,, ], CITY lF ORCMR AWTgM .: u— ONA e.ilptn ula[Inq .pet n WiQd% rrom W erel eater — .„— w.t...N;.t�q .� I, mwn w� TNd .y in T W . — Aainlsi.r I w e0me dewaee O�ep.rl r, the W�alia+ nl le,g pparR mi. Uo I, w"', rm" alRl- w ekrolipy p 1 tepoq�ap><y ,par II ee net pa, t 1° xnx my olhr irprar.,w,ta a .acrnatl.nnTta. t- a�E ;� Cl. Existing Site w 7085 i CITY OF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY & PROPOSED SITE PLAN FOR `�h WEBER ARCHITECTSa OF LOT I, BLOCK 2, CITY OF ORONO ADDITION ; i bra KELLEY PARKWAY HENNEPIN COUNTY, bfINNESOTA U: Zia Piz {{ 4 F` L r + rr L V OIJTLOT Q ¢ : - I JI Ir s'=i i f i R., JI # I :EGµ OESOWT N U PREM5E5 Y ' r V ZLai 1, &a& 7. VTY OF CROW AioruN S�g� .S�'� IS l .�• PROPOSED _ � a I I �+' I I -�3'� ,�. aeaatvs v.op9veo spar ekwlton, mra, xo k.a wwn : � e BUILDING T.,— -. emat.. a„1o, —t— �.. r,..a, ,m w..� eat— o r a ' �w.a na - isiID�: av v.v wev°sre o lw v. nvv ,.v M aan. } sP! 0745 j 1 0 9.w.,.v. r,o.m ar emee ,yvr� d, ww.r�ea evt Y i j i i j I o nor ti.y wo�ap „v�v,var „ m e. e.vr., m r'e 1Ner ma.vlvr-tix -J I I n oa,sro, s.anr.+t encw ev d,avex an wro,e pyr�rq win vmeea uw a.aMr i i � i p 1 rer sr.vr :.tom tr' v,vx tn. ne,norre a, tee eeevv e,svmva prvp.rry, j ram' /. -- _ _ d r rro ncotio,. arm .=atpw verr�q n: cue a.e Eynvr, roeM �Idtie,, ,aat - ____ _ __ __ I y Lirq W1.asrc..ev<i mtl cryoEm�FerwR��Caes rwt aW wq 1.te�Me N• �swa j lA f "" Mr ,poem nla tr oo meta Si p �vu 7Ci .--- --- - - .. .. ... - _ _ _ - _ _ _ - rcr u.e - :11,310 5a it. f 3 ,�- --- — `- - - - - - "" ,.r.� p•avv,.e e,daPy . �r.147 yr N 89°]5' 26" W "^'^ 377.35 - - - _ ... -_ _ E,:rtr,y s apv.ed ppoo��•.y - 27.7Aa s! wry Pr uC xw - ,5L6 p 9� - l40 f 6 �Qr H,C.S.A.H. NO, 112 p� oao.d.b„ss„ �o WAYZATA BLVD, W. € ... C2, Site Plan STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN PLAN FOR WEBER ARCHITECTS OF LOT 1, BLOCK 2, CITY OF ORON❑ ADDITION 1 CITY Or HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA M&M KELLEY PART♦ WAY OkOrr10 AD I Or+-m I _ � r• 1 PROPOSED•r 1 y { ! BUILDING '� 'r F_.IIIII r � r, -_ _---�•". .« -•• - H.C.S.A.H. NO. 112 WAYZATA BLVD. W. f LEQU DESC TIDk W PNENSCS . Lpl r- Blep¢ 2, CITY CF ONOW AUDITM ° tlewi¢s ipn nvMp [vpnsj • pmxin •rmr ry ape! derelien. mean wp nrd delves ®: tlert¢te. p.pposetl zxf ebrulim rnpon aeo 4.°1 mtvn •i,--I den . -41" ¢°nlow Fr. .nem eep �e.r miWn �,� yermte. #eW,¢tl [dro.. Ina. mean aeo sera• polvn 9emeq. vn.n w a¢ea0 w¢n w a.>rwrre ml— IN surer ntdMg W a,ee lee LdM:.ief e, I" ¢E erevie¢e Ww&iy, 1k bcolirr¢ o! m exi,reg pukrq W. ose vw polc,, riib¢ ul ii�ey spot e4r¢t�o^s '.im Y Ogf by ,M¢ Q va gro0[. ilww¢ rt eau rol wau' 1p e,n• mr uilw u¢pr°rememe w ewwe' nenle. � ¢ w naMiC��n ° ."'c,u ro.�w eLw•Pe , wr .l [Juela Yr oa'"'��,w*�....,......oaoem.'."��"Cro`ar,.e�"'s ' 7 08 5 • � ier•fOw2 Y •a w�cc�.., YM•�'i¢w •�'i�u��i..i •aw•Oer41(i sia�f[ $ a'A' Vp �nf ot� nurlis� w� wn�w � ��s�'Fti� fw�st'wt � i rYawl�A•wiY..�x .[ is ir;,r �;nr usi made r°e�"aro..Kan ter¢ �....e.ra�.*a C3. Storm Water Plan uwa.a 6 � en _ ..e � MUN•�oSMati� GTRENCII GICLF S.o• Fsi RAilpy �TREATLIEM WLLN.F a�uameci `: V--"LATERAL TILE-: B1pREfEN9PN �L . TaEvpe CE'iNL wma.ira POND 4 a u•ar�r+.r PQND • OUTIET STANDARD DETAILS •-• 3 •rT'A•xnl w (1)nov is � � :4:� R Ee•. AE•.1.: _R:'.1E'{i a.. K'K•ayaE ��s •a . 7085 V 0. SHELF --� LYTRA710.Y TRFArr.�rrr „y K� d V b0111ALE �_ �� EL roar r TEv v TEML TILEjthL•e a:•d'N]e"Ivc id3 - I siWr•� e•. � fir=-, DIPRETENPPN � ."e Ica• i!$o TR[IYH OETAlL ���5�� Pane 3 avrLET - POND i ewer eea.. �-.�w• i+r7.5 PPNP S PIfTLFF r w>•vwc>•w • wi.l.rsm r.w A[mawn ••rn+H umf /.1(Pa.GavwwCmA[�.wL �Lrem a+�rt mro�cunw j3 i L4. Details 0=- 7 vilon-s�-lu�nTo stop a.a fl0.�ygmni oyx ^�fR� LTOH LL'.Y��MENK STANDARD DETAILS M4RO 1°w I =.- W R+ieNvc �- /IIR i(JLTON iMHNK � r I Ih,u CONCLit PDEWA L 7 08 5 ft IL;6; ���Qdo17LENl(. un� M: = == (DHOLTON �OLTON I CS. Details 3 W AGENDA ITEM Date: March 10, 2025 Item: 17 Title: LA24-000070, 2195 Watertown Road, Easement Vacation - Resolution 7563 Presenter: Melanie Curtis, Planner Section: Consent Agenda Purpose: This application contemplates an easement vacation and dedication in order to ensure the easement is correctly covering the existing drainage improvement. 2. Background: The application involves corrections to the easement dedicated to cover the re-routed drainageway which crosses the two newly reoriented and platted lots. Once the grading work in the drainage ditch was completed, it was discovered that a portion of the rerouted drainage ditch was located outside of the drainage easement dedicated with the Cumberland plat. To correct the easement, the applicant requests a vacation of an unnecessary portion of the easement in exchange for dedicating new easement area to encompass the ditch. Please refer to the Planning Commission Staff Memo for a full analysis. 3. Planning Commission Vote and Comment: The Planning Commission reviewed the request at their February 18th meeting. After the public hearing, the Commission voted 7 to 0 on a motion to recommend approval conditioned upon the property owner dedicating new easement over the portion of the drainageway not within the easement. 4. Public Comment: The City received several inquiries regarding the purpose and scope of the project. None of the inquiries resulted in formal comments on the vacation. However, one neighbor submitted comments regarding the previous grading project to reroute the ditch, attached as Exhibit C. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. The proposed replacement easement should be recorded against the property concurrently with the vacation resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Move to adopt Resolution 7563 approving the vacation. Exhibits A. Resolution 7563 B. Easement Exhibit C. Public Comment D. AsBuilt Grading Survey E. Draft PC Minutes 139 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7563 CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION VACATING EASEMENTS FILE No. LA24-000070 WHEREAS, on December 23, 2024, Tom Ryan (hereinafter the "Applicant"), applied to vacate an unused portion of an existing dedicated drainage and utility easement over the property addressed 2195 Watertown Road, and legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Cumberland, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the "Property"). WHEREAS, the drainage and utility easement were dedicated to the public at the time of the Final Plat of Cumberland on April 22, 2024 by Resolution No. 7466; and WHEREAS, the drainage and utility easements were dedicated over the proposed footprint of a realigned drainage ditch which was under construction at the time of the Final Plat approval; and WHEREAS, upon review of the as -built grading plan for the drainage ditch it was noted that the described easement area and the existing ditch did not align. A portion of the existing realigned drainage ditch was not fully encompassed within the dedicated easement area. Additionally, because of the misalignment of the easement, additional land not part of the drainage ditch was encumbered by the dedicated easement. The Applicant is amenable to granting the additional easement to the public to correct the misalignment as part of their request for vacation of the unnecessary portion of the easement; and WHEREAS, Exhibit A describing and depicting the easement to be vacated, attached to this Resolution No. 7563 is true and correct and are incorporated into and made part of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 412.851 and the Orono City Code, on February 18, 2025, the Planning Commission of the City of Orono conducted a public hearing preceded by two (2) weeks published and posted notice, and mailed notice to the abutting property owners, to consider the vacation of the unnecessary easement; and WHEREAS, following the hearing and consideration of the proposed vacation, the review of the Zoning File #LA24-000070, and the recommendation of the Planning Commission, the Orono City Council has determined that the unnecessary portion of the easement is not needed for public purposes. 140 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7563 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono that the unnecessary portion of the drainage and utility easement is hereby vacated subject to the Applicant providing an executed drainage and utility easement to cover the remainder of the drainage ditch prior to recording. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 1011 day of March, 2025. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: Christine Lusian, City Clerk Bob Tunheim, Mayor 141 DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT VACATION IN LOT 2, BLOCK 1, CUMBERLAND DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT TO BE VACATED Those parts of the drainage and utility easement dedicated in Lot 2, Block 1, Cumberland described as follows: Commencing at the most westerly corner of said Lot 2; thence on an assumed bearing of South 19 degrees 25 minutes 35 seconds East along the westerly line of said Lot 2 a distance of 18.40 feet; thence North 89 degrees 38 minutes 08 seconds East a distance of 5.29 feet to the east line of the west 5.00 feet of said Lot 2 and the point of beginning of the easement being vacated; thence continuing North 89 degrees 38 minutes 08 seconds East a distance of 20.76 feet; thence South 59 degrees 06 minutes East a distance of 69.80 feet; thence South 37 degrees 03 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 197.00 feet; thence North 54 degrees West a distance of 93.00 feet; thence North 37 degrees 16 minutes 41 seconds West a distance of 93.51 feet; thence North 58 degrees 48 minutes 35 seconds West a distance of 66.85 to said east line of the west 5.00 feet; thence North 19 degrees 25 minutes 35 seconds West along said east line of the west 5.00 feet to the point of beginning. MOST WESTERLY EASEMENT EXHIBIT CORNER OF LOT 2 IN LOT 2, BLOCK 1, CUMBERLAND N 89°38'08" E o \, .... 26.05 o `� F 990 SS&D _ 5.61 S 82°2T20" E,, t=-21_13_\ 6685 I� cP `uo.\5 L? po \5 , N \ \\ `S`\ � 6 `\\ 38 °03� ��56 ��9 WEST LINE m `� 6`\ \ OF LOT 2 BLOCK \\ 1 �F9 �p \ s l J r m m s O \ �O o\�� Zo \% G � 'sc's \\`\ 00 O �ij� 109 5c e Im F------- L I I 1 5 0 i \ S� I O c ) �4 e- .o d'cy \ N `\ tt O `\ O \ O \ Z \ 134.99 ----� 143 IV 'DR "Ar." S 37-03' 30" 252.84 b 000 0 19 lC-TP4T- ro Nq VAC-A-r-�J9,,"� 3) — — — — — — — Q; 1965 DRAINAGE AND mfivl �#Qll 04 IR ...-UTILITY EASEMENTS .1 �4 6 O ' / 1lg1(966.1) (965.5) (9651 .4 (96A.6) TCJ�'% lo 0O� Oh oj k9623) DI 3 411r, -9FA 962— (965.2 %�.� i / / ���'^ryg, / ���, i / lg�1l sss (9662)-::� �7) E 968— S 26*"Ir., J" Al TO 6IF CA -kT(o �9611 co) kgrr,.(J) k9 69 0der t.) s 40 lqo2 C� tK' r(,C A,.N to cr ti 86 � -- --- --- to 40 A. "0<*" C2 CIO CV co 0 ,K 40 , 0 e,6 0 , C. q) (0 -*i C2 0 -,� ej e, 4Q1 C-j ID qj NQ 4�- el e, 4Q% --��� �\ \�-'/ \\ / 0 0 / \ \ \ \ \ I \ / t�,`'' <0 .0 N el y K 'Co 0 Quo k% Q,O0 c 144 .- From: Melanie Curtis To: "HEIDI HUST Cc: Tom Major; Kirk Nelson; Judy Nelson; Permitting Subject: RE: 2195 Watertown Rd / LA24-000070 Date: Thursday, February 13, 2025 2:10:00 PM The movement of the easement provides the necessary protections for the existing drainage way. The vacant lot will have to comply with all relevant rules through our permitting process, if and when it develops. Melanie Curtis Direct: 952.249.4627 mcurtisgoronomn.gov From: HEIDI HUST<hrhust@msn.com> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2025 11:16 AM To: Melanie Curtis <MCurtis@oronomn.gov> Cc: Tom Major <majorts@yahoo.com>; Kirk Nelson <kirk.nelson@mchsi.com>; Judy Nelson <nelson.judy@mchsi.com>; Permitting <permitting@minnehahacreek.org> Subject: Re: 2195 Watertown Rd / LA24-000070 I understand this is just on paper. My concern is that the redraw allows for changes in the future as the volume increases. When they build on that vacant lot the water flow will change again. Was any thought given to what happens when the hardcover goes on that property? If we see standing water on it now what happens when they regrade? Heidi Rosekrans Hust/Rosie's Gardens 2225 Devin Lane Orono, MN 55356 home: 952.476.6911 cell: 612.590.4008 From: Melanie Curtis <MCurtis(cDoronomn.g_ov> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2025 16:09 To: HEIDI HUST<hrhust(@msn.com> Cc: Tom Major <majortsl@yahoo.com>; Kirk Nelson <kirk.nelsonl@mchsi.com>; Judy Nelson <nelson.iudyl@mchsi.com>; Permitting <permitting(cDminnehahacreek.org> Subject: RE: 2195 Watertown Rd / LA24-000070 Heidi The "redraw' is merely a paperwork/document issue. There will be no grading or change to the topography on site. The staff report and exhibits will be available Friday afternoon on the City's website. See attached. Melanie Curtis 145 Direct: 952.249.4627 mcurtisgoronomn.gov From: HEIDI HUST<hrhust(@msn.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2025 4:07 PM To: Melanie Curtis <MCurtis(cDoronomn.gov> Cc: Tom Major <majorts(@yahoo.com>; Kirk Nelson <kirk.nelson(@mchsi.com>; Judy Nelson <nelson.judyPmchsi.com>; Permitting<permitting(@minnehahacreek.org> Subject: Re: 2195 Watertown Rd / LA24-000070 The work is generally satisfactory. I urge you to be certain that this redraw is forward thinking. The work on the Ryan property is the result of Long Lake's project years ago that coincided with heavy rains. The issues were blamed on the heavy rain, but they were also a result of increased hardcover, loss of vegetation and rerouting drainage all over Long Lake. I documented it and submitted my concern that the water volume was increasing back then. The volume of water routed into this drainage continues to increase. Looking at the new drainage on the Ryan property, we are seeing ice dams, overflows in a normal heavy rain and standing water in all low areas of the 2 lots well after they should have disappeared. When the drainage is redrawn, it will be important to be proactive and anticipate the increase in volume and what might need to be done in the future to accommodate this. Will the sides need to be steeper to stop the area from flooding and carrying more dirt downstream to clog the marsh. Will there need to be a holding pond to stop the flooding? Does Long Lake need to find an alternative to route for their drains? Please be sure the redraw will allow the drainage to be maintained properly. Heidi Heidi Rosekrans Hust/Rosie's Gardens 2225 Devin Lane Orono, MN 55356 home: 952.476.6911 cell: 612.590.4008 From: Melanie Curtis <MCurtis(@oronomn.gov> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2025 14:41 To: HEIDI HUST<hrhust(@msn.com> Cc: Tom Major <maiorts(@)Iahoo.com>; Kirk Nelson <kirk.nelson(@mchsi.com>; Judy Nelson <nelson.judy(@mchsi.com>; Permitting<permitting(@minnehahacreek.org> Subject: RE: 2195 Watertown Rd / LA24-000070 Heidi Thank you for your comments and photos. It was my impression that you were generally satisfied with Tom Ryan's work on the ditch, according to your attached email. I will share your comments and photos with the Commission, 146 the Permitting staff at the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and the City's engineer. At this time, Mr. Ryan is not proposing to conduct any grading or make any physical changes on the land. The application to be discussed at the Planning Commission meeting on Tuesday, February 18th involves corrections to the easement covering the drainageway. A portion of the rerouted drainage ditch is located outside of the drainage easement Mr. Ryan dedicated with the recent plat reorienting his lots. The City intends to vacate an unnecessary portion of the easement in exchange for the corrected easement. This will be the topic of the meeting on Tuesday. Thank you, Melanie Melanie Curtis Direct: 952.249.4627 mcurtis(@oronomn.gov From: HEIDI HUST <hrhust(@msn.com> Sent: Friday, February 7, 2025 9:15 AM To: Melanie Curtis <MCurtis(@oronomn.gov> Cc: Tom Major <majorts(@ahoo.com>; Kirk Nelson <kirk.nelsonPmchsi.com>; Judy Nelson <nelson.judy(cDmchsi.com> Subject: Re: 2195 Watertown Rd / LA24-000070 Melanie. Thanks for getting back to me. I drove by the site yesterday and took some photos. There are significant ice dams. Should we have a rain event the waterflow is disrupted. The continuing increase in hardcover upstream in Long Lake has put enormous pressure on this drainage. Where does all the water go from those fancy new storm drains in long lake? There was standing water all over that lot last year. Putting more hardcover on the lot it is going to put even more pressure on this drainage. All the studies were done in drought years. Last year the new drainage overflowed. I am working out of town and will be unable to attend the meeting. Please note my concern that the drainage be redrawn accommodating this change in volume. Heidi Hust Get Outlook for iOS From: Melanie Curtis <MCurtis(@oronomn.gov> Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2025 9:11:48 AM To: hrhustPmsn.COm <hrhustPrnsn.com> Subject: 2195 Watertown Rd / LA24-000070 Hi Heidi, I understand that you stopped in yesterday. Tano at the front desk said you planned on sending me some comments and photos. Tom Ryan's current application for easement vacation (and new easement dedicated) is primarily to correct a 147 discrepancy between the drainage ditch and easement boundaries. We will be considering a vacation to remove a portion of the easement that extends further than needed and the establishment of new easement area to ensure that the easement fully covers the extent of the drainage way. Melanie Curtis, Planner 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Website: www.oronomn.gov Email: mcurtisooronomn.gov Direct 952.249.4627 Planning & Zoning Department 952.249.4620 148 i 16 dp rw 19% te +f•�.{'7i �1?} rrYi �a.1�,1 k '�5 + Yl ' f y ■ ' �' ;. +Ijki{F F +! { r ^#r a� + '' r,�3 �_� F� +Yr J + i M - f r 7 +}• ir' .[ ' Y l I I �4 � , ` r` '. T � x 'r' �Fqg r �+ 7 Y F k , ! {•,''a� ti f ' }S %r; 1dr , ,• 4, k r ■ }ter ti 1 } i ' rle .L* aL'� ll t . tiL�•drjj L _ rr A'.�. Op `` I ■ k' } 1 r {•� t� .'tY'. ,y' ti, +'f�. + ;l y -• ! ' ` ' a1 '*t y Y f j r - 6- F: - } _ y 7. 7 % } s11 -- r � { � � �� f t� `� � ' I r ti' - �• fir} �� L ' � h } + M1r - ' •_ � } �� •� ti - +'' 1 � � 't'{ k ' _ '`_ i' � J • ,i,{{ J ' '� I+•r` ' y ' , . 'l �''�•' `t r 7 i I— � F h� rl , t r k,; -' 4_ ti ,_ �r r F�1 ' f� f i {.: I%. 'J* R •- - ,`fir, L) lhj- •y - ,f•, •__ _ -•~i - - '+�' • t'{ � - I ' � - __ M1k � � �—L _X' —T _.� •+-'',- k, ' � �T � +�• �'f F ` _.__-�• r-. .�+ S� '- i 46' Ir � - Y �'� '� _ _. k Y� �, •��I4 '- �Lr-•�•`' �T�r � ' � __ - � f - � r � 1• 5.k ter} �' x 1 '{ Y F. '* 1�' •� I r'S - y _ %% _ • . Y _ a-T_rrr k F err _ l l •� _+- !'� ± - L .rl .I i' a ', • 1 F , t I k 5 k �7, Lt. yIF r�+' lam, y + #r t t } 2. r 1 � I � � • - _ � �� r � I . r k!'I~ � • �. '�+ J , � r.~ - • ' 1 l+"4+ _ � t'--. � ; � . I J ! � . _ '' #� ,.3 .._..ter s , _ _ I, L 1 r L M1^ ' S.4 r r t _ { • M Ti, kk 411 41 41 1 F y y ik rr Lde do L � r' P,� a� t s•k F,,r rrF'a } Q. +P 41!ft ON IL IF tip, A6 __ . '7�.,y-` i '' P F'r. IL 9 L. P-4 IP% S # �•}, + '•4 �4A�• _ Try ' i T f Fs 4 'i J'. Y• + 41 •+N �1-� ''' f,* r '•+� 3 + .� 'ter ram_''+�'•+:.f�T''Li } �.+ •. � Llt •''-► Jr 94, - :� L' ,F1� `` �Fh' _ rr r' ',7• I - _ 4F '�}fir'* T� • ' "+ ,i�F _ •' * y • +is, sw 11 ' ti t irJi T 'IF' k +�ah t I i r Lqh 1 dh .-ram L�i {� •r �. �# ,� a3 tip.ti'f •'S �•, L + ,I - "�Jr, t ' r'` * S 149 Ik I 1 —47 -W4 r' ok lb jr d 114pp Ir s p It p L L . L4 .0pr ;r % I I - Pr 10 p d d L L 0 % rr pr 4dP j r P.r 4L _41F MA dk h r & V, 0 4% I F1•ip 16■ L j .06 dPk so dt- I d 11 q* 41L b!_ 'so d qF 40 p :A I L AD p Op ar R 1p 46 r 410 cJ'i I r r k pril ji Np, h IF J..4 0 1 L d -e IL v IiL .0 �6 4 f Ikk L p 71 4 A, 4w% % IV k I%q 40,%. k1k' 1�6 ja ■ aw 46 .4 Iq p r, A I Nd OP - N: ' - L 41h L 40 * ' � k k I,. y ter—„ - ' W&'- �' IL A LN 411 p 40 , �j;6 '_ 4 IP IPL 4 d A p b qk P Ve - - III, % kk;� & I 4L t — -■ :. . 9pp p 4k� 4b Ar MIM" WW, A Mir d qL -Ww' I 114P , w A q IP I; *i 4. z I _;iO5M LIA dp 41P( OM qp 7t, % ')F - r - W. IF o6r F Lkao dr __dMP L dJ 10 L rf ir V I p ;t ice TZ AKOI A JMr 3!tl 7.6,*40 w p b. 4 I M_ 44 %J6 .66. d J L M RL + 16 '�6 Ir grANN- 'M *6 b 41P d IFL p t IN 4 di - 4 .0 p I . IlkP q r __w 'P-4 AL rp 0,06 IP % IF 4 111� X4.. .6 ;n IL 6 1, Orl ti _j I I L si p Orr r 4 10 p L I 1 6 Pp qr Ih _ffl 1.11% . L 41 . . . . 4 N .0 , RIM, 6 i L r 44" It LON.. d dl- plor I jbl rid 4 . . . .•j . -, M %64 _4, 111,` F L4I` I I ol- I L ; ILI. L�1 . I wil . -,.' ., T� "T a" kft4 . FIV k dMp k f 6W 41154 IL F F 10 C 4A I , d* I. rf Y, Irr ky p p M dw d P6 �d; Al J dr low d_1 `A,� I.r. IF pr I. d :#06 •111C I If I p OEJ .0"-- ' P dF V % 'A irr jl6 jr If RL % rp 2P. -_ P , L Mr 110 jq -P .1 1 , wd kp -ft ► Wr t it- L L d tA L V46 t HL .06 4 jt;4 p tn-.. IF F r1a r3 or r Lill IL p kah p I kj -7. �d 'NP y. lh�j 16 a Jh dr -4 T. All -rA PL %j MEN % Y % ?r % L 6 OL ak k OA f L r r 111i 71P -P r & 6 S_ A ��! % L4L .qL d % % % Orr IL � 14 Pis L O"MM6,14WA 0 . or, L too -AV Tl -P d Op Ar Ar .j -a bw I IL ob 0 w- b. I. W. MRR IF mop w 1. W s A* n Flo %F. i y16 i ILL JA IeZr r4 L -qp % 6 To" 0 AT Pho L 4' J A e� L ir� Vj 3,. r F Or Op F I r lylll:g pf qr W1 dr rA A. r -L jr .4, 11%. 5M 11rct Jr. o- A p -5 F L 41 L% 41 d0a A% W S p Y10A ,jl& 1pk F Wjr LL Vp IF Jq 400 p Im 0 L do,.f 41! r -_P k iff�& ;'roe M RP. wr. PN.M� L r. * 1 $ p %L"' *> Sk Idi h LF 1 h 4F .91 t IL L7 . L IF 0 ATM, k. A -L of 0-�O . ? I I: �L . , .4 I.L '4 p 4k A# Lid T P P'. 16P T-Mt If JFT* A 'k '1116 q jpL It. 11 d r j L IF k' I'L I pp- 4" ■ ?.Pf IP6 P1. L JO IL N?Q 6Z pa 'Avg V wo , 10 S44 R. Id rt dp dr 41 '-p it: i I T 11. k it* I d"W V. .Q; III. — -- — , — S DRAINAGE DITCH AS -BUILT FOR TOM RYAN OF LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 1, CUMBERLAND HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA \ \ \ \ � I \ � I / / \ I/ / / I 10 I i ._____�_ DRAINAGE AND \ UTILITY EAS MENTS 5 .•{' I t � 00 1 I I N O I o 51 / I '.,� Imo._._--�-----I------- ..r_. / I N 89025' loll W 465.04 �a 0/9 "'.000 18 0 / N 89°38' 08" f,05 13 (s\ 2.� 3o. S 82.27' 20', E \ {974.8) Cg�42i I (973.�)?65.45 (2>��--`__ -• \ \\ (972.3)/ \\ I........ \ 6001.03 \ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, CUMBERLAND o : denotes iron marker (908.3) : denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum --917--: denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum and county maps Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, and the location of an existing drainage ditch, spot elevations and topography thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. \ \ 5 to \ O \; \Ln \ I N '. L.4.....40.92---------- w H Z z cQ a a n W A z Er-, z a Y H C/1 QJ 0 \\ Co L \ A L0 \\ o \ \ �► vi w = \ \ \ \\ zh z w � ,0 \\ ,� 0 a \ Ty, o \ \ F_ NM t0 oN 46 LLJ N LL \ \ \\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ o CF DRAI/ \ \ EA AND �\ \\ 04) \ r DUTY \, ss4 \ .,.. UTILITY EA €MENTS '•, \ o 41 > E E_j -'N 8910 W \ 2�3.83 ... -- ........ co 1:� a -0 42 o \ \ 2-0 Q) a� 41 o 0 1 C co o C C 5 6 # o U p-4 N �Q o wi 0 30 60 120 S C A L E I N F E E T Z 0 W Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 18, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Kim Simensen of Minnetonka said she knows the applicants and keeps chickens on her property and in the four years she has had them, they have not attracted predators. She said keeping pigeons is popular in Europe and is an emerging sport here. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 9:02 p.m. Commissioners discussed possibly limiting the number of birds if the City whether pigeons are farm animals; the possibility that raising, trading and and whether the coop met the requirements for an auxiliary structure. It amend the code around the issue of birds as farm animals. Ressler moved, Prchal seconded, to approve LA24-01 Use Permit & Variances, as applied limiting to a mai a text amendment for farm animals. VOTE: Ayes: 7, LA24-000067, NORTHSTAR RENOVA AVENUE. VARIANCES �&' The Planning Commission is requested to rev] approve the request for a new average lakeshc from a deck and steps approved by a different The Planning Commission Northstar Renovations LL( Chair Bollis opened There were no public 25 an animal unit; n create a business, d the City needs to Conditional staff consider a presentation, and discuss and Dv deck and steps that differ of staff and the applicant, Eric Brandt, that the adjustments between variance requests were minor. to approve LA24-000067, Northstar Renovations es. VOTE: Ayes: 7, Nays 0. The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and approve an easement vacation for an unnecessary portion of easement with the understanding that the property owner would give a small piece of additional needed easement to accommodate the project as built. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff. The applicant had been present but was unable to stay. Page 4 of 8 153 Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 18, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 9:27 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 9:27 p.m. Commissioners discussed whether the easement could be needed in the future that isn't needed. Ressler moved, Brandabur seconded, to approve LA24-000070, 2194" Vacation as applied. VOTE: Ayes: 7, Nays 0. 6.7 LA25-000001, TOM BRAY OB/O EDWARD H. H #*B�iWA' TRUST:ORCHARD ROAD SOUTH, PRELIMINARY PL TERMINATION OF COVENANT. The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff approve a new preliminary plat creating one addjjjonal con The Planning Commission discussed the Edina, an attorney for Edward Hamm. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 9:48 Jamin Marks, 1570 Fox, materials for the meetin% Chair Bollis closed the p re never be South, Pry Plat Nays 1 (Bo A 6.8 LA25 land Road, Easement re a presentation, and discuss and and terminating a covenant. and the applicant, Tom Bray, northern portion of the property and said s sense ss a Fox Street runs through the property and it would ..e two lots, a northern and a southern. Bollis was opposed to seco'ded, to approve LA25-000001, Orono Orchard Road Blue Waters And Termination of Covenant. VOTE: Ayes: 6, WOOD LLC, 155 WEAR LANE NORTH, VARIANCES The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and approve a request for a new covered stoop to control water getting into the house. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff and the applicants, John Daly Stonewood, Wayzata and Ross Johnson, 155 Wear Lane, the homeowner. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 10:09 p.m. Page 5 of 8 154 AGENDA ITEM Date: March 10, 2025 Title: LA24-000067, 2691 Ethel Avenue, Variance - Resolution 7562 Presenter: Matt Karney, Planner Section: Consent Agenda Purpose: The applicant requests an average lakeshore setback variance for a deck replacement. Item: 18 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline: The application was made on December 10, 2024 and deemed complete on January 7, 2025. The application was given as administrative extension resulting in 120-day review period to expire on May 7, 2025. 3. Background: The applicant proposes a new deck, retaining walls, and landscaping on the LR-1C zoned property. Variances were granted in 2023 allowing modifications to the existing home and a new deck lakeward of the average lakeshore setback (ALS). The proposed deck is a modification from the approved plans within the ALS, necessitating additional review by the Planning Commission and City Council. Per the cover letter submitted by the applicant, the previous contractor completed most of the previous project, but exited prior to completing the formerly approved deck improvements. The current contractor is proposing the minor amendments. Link to Planning Commission Packet. 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment: On February 18, 2025, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and discussed the requested variance. Following the public hearing, the Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the variance as recommended by staff. Link to Planning Commission Video. Public Comment: No public comments have been received. 6. Staff Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Council should move to adopt Resolution 7562, approving the requested variance subject to conditions. Exhibits A. Resolution 7562 B. Survey & Landscape Plan C. Deck Plans D. Draft PC Minutes 155 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7562 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-1279 FILE NO. LA24-000067 WHEREAS, on December 10, 2024, Northstar Renovations LLC ("Applicant"), applied for a variance from the City Code for the property addressed 2691 Ethel Avenue and legally described as: Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 115, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except that part thereof lying Southeasterly of a line drawn from a point on the Southwesterly line of said tract distant 15 feet Northwesterly from the most Southerly corner of said tract, through the Northeasterly corner of said tract. Together with an easement for right of way for road purposes over that part of Block 5, Winship's Subdivision of Lot Number One (1 ), Spring Park, 2nd Division, lying Southwesterly of the premises above described and between the Northerly extension of the Easterly line and the Westerly line of Ethel Avenue (now Tract E, Registered Land Survey No. 115) and also together with the right to use of shore for private bathing and dock in front of a strip of land 15 feet in width, lying Southeasterly of and immediately adjacent to the Southeasterly line of the premises hereinabove first described, and which 15 foot strip runs Northeasterly along the Southeasterly line of said premises from the Easterly extension of the Southwesterly line of said premises to the shore of Carmen's Bay Lake Minnetonka; (now Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 115), Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the "Property"); WHEREAS, the Applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a setback variance from Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to replace a deck within the average lakeshore setback with minor footprint expansions; and WHEREAS, on February 18, 2025, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on February 18, 2025, the Planning Commission voted 7 to 0 in favor of a motion to recommend approval of the variance as recommended by staff; and WHEREAS, on March 10, 2025, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and 156 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7562 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variance as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: Al. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #LA24-000067. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above -mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. A2. The Property is located in the LR-lC (One -Family Lakeshore Residential) Zoning District. A3. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District, and the applicant is proposing 24.9% hardcover with this project. A4. Applicant has applied for an average lakeshore setback variance. A5. In considering this application for a variance, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. VARIANCE ANALYSIS: B1. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance; the Average Lakeshore Setback (ALS) makes the development and improvement of the Property and existing house challenging. The proposal does not significantly encroach into the lake views of the adjacent owners along Lake Minnetonka, meeting the intent and purpose of the Ordinance; and B2. Variances shall only be permitted when consistent with the comprehensive plan; the proposed variance to construct a deck as an accessory use to a single-family residence is permitted within LR-1C zoning and is consistent with the comprehensive plan; and B3. Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls; the request to 157 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7562 build a deck lakeward of the ALS is reasonable and meets all other applicable zoning regulations; and b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner; the existing home is located with the ALS and any improvements to the home would fall within the lake views of the adjacent neighbors; and c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; the variance bears similarities to the approvals granted in 2023. The proposed deck would not substantially impact the neighbors' views of the lake and will fit the character of the neighborhood according to the submitted and reviewed information. B4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties; economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination; and B5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78; this condition is not applicable; and B6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located; this condition is not applicable as a deck attached to a single-family home is allowed within in the LR-IC district; and B7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling; this condition is not applicable; and B8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property; the Property is encumbered by an ALS that severely limits further development of the Property, and limits expansions or changes to the existing home and deck; and B9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located; the house is located entirely lakeward of the ALS; only in -kind replacement or reduction of existing conditions would be permitted without variances. These conditions are unique to the Property; and B10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; granting the variance is necessary to preserve 158 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7562 the landowners' right to make improvements including construction of a new lakeward deck or to make footprint changes to the existing deck; and B11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter; granting a variance in this situation is not contrary to the intent of the Zoning Regulations; and B12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty; the requested variance is necessary to make any improvements to the existing deck and does not merely serve as a convenience to the property owner. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance from Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to replace a deck with minor footprint expansions within the average lakeshore setback, subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 2. The approved project shall conform to the survey & landscape plan, and building plans submitted by the Applicant, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A & B. 3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the owners, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A framing inspection must be completed within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (March 10, 2026). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 10th day of March, 2025. 159 ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7562 CITY OF ORONO: Christine Lusian, City Clerk Bob Tunheim, Mayor 160 PROPOSED CONDITIONS c lcccu,.n I _ ,z e --:A s9 54`I4 eExc,a n4RKv�., 5EIBACK5SSTREeT i}1/ sv; // / o �'e«+_\ Cir,�e a}M1 /" >s LAKE nw�-enwn nxn moe�ec ._ /n>E K ��uo TR'�'T A y i Ell — TRACT D sR9'IS 14 E 251 09 zs PLAT > �; A,d^ LAKE MINNETONKA — m�� CARMAN BAY E 2 \\\\\ ` [. °r w.T III—aaFs nnia2(av�wss) Dx o a o aemrMM eYszuewnya.�.em... r�mm.wm�me.wu,�.menla el krana evr.iwa )iameC yofomnotmnnemro en. _—DIP 1� I17 ry EC NB x ps e a SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. a, 0 1400025THAVENUENORTH.SUITE120 ORONO, PLYM 0 LII=1� °T8°0°° MINNESOTA SURVEYLEGEND ®P PoN PPE 11 I"E °® = P -E=r aTi F�ry _ -LI aowPao o ®_ 4ae rvrviT° �— ° rv° _ER MaL a°. 0 w °°T °LE — — ®� -- © L ° mIALIE _ AD =aL °°a� °ry IALIE s w .rvo a- ry CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY Na 2 PREPARED FOR- HOME REFLECTIONS 2 OR 2691 ETHEL AVENUE, ORONO MN 55391 BENCH MARK 932.7 SETBACKS= 3m' STREET Im' SIDE 3m' REAR 75' LAKE -------------------------------------------- GROSS PARCEL AREA 33,836 SF HARDCOVER ALLOWANCE 25% // 8,459 SF -------------------------------------------- SQUARE FOOTAGE HOUSE 2,366 STOOP 144 EXISTING DRIVEWAY 3,33m PROPOSDE DRIVEWAY EXTENSION 37m PROPOSED DECK &STAIRS 924 PROPOSED FRONT PAVERS 19m PROPOSED GARAGE 25 PROPOSED PAVERS OUTSIDE DECK Sm PROPOSED STONE STEPS LAKE 223 PROPOSED STONE STEPS GARAGE 96 PROPOSED FLAGSTONE 75 PROPOSED STONE WALLS 612 TOTAL PROPOSED HARDCOVER 8 435 PROPOSED % HARDCOVER 24.94% J J o t) 0 o U ._ Q WALL 8'L X 1.5'H WALL 14'L X 6'...2'H WALL 6'LX2'H (65 SF H.G.) O FONDULAC OUTCROP STONE STEPS, OR CHARCOAL GRANITE OUTCROP (6) 175 SF TRAP SAND TRAIL WITH I m OLF RUSTIC MOUNTAIN STONE EDGER ._ 0 U 0 cn + D LIGH LIGHT = 0 0 LIGHT qq UP PAT P� P4T UP J LIGHTT IGH aD OaT W 00 UP UP UP @ OO LGHT ,� IGHT LIGHT UP D T a THO UP i � a D v LIGHT P H � � LIGHT 7 LIG 0 4 Pp LIGH PAT LIGHT HT "6 °°$o oso �°�° �O � Oi a O �° r 0 ° oo 3° ❑ BLACK HILLS SPRUCE (5) 8 FONDULAC OUTCROPS THROUGHOUT THE ° o� OL LANDSCAPE (22) g° + LIGHT a 6' FONDULAC STONE STEP K s MOUNDED SOIL \ ap s° C +UP 14) H ; ° HT moos a LIGHT T °° o 8a 8 SHORELINE RESTORATION. APPX 30 LN FT TO CODE LI H O DOg �00 —� 4m' o° o0 FIELDSTONE BOULDERS WITH RIP RAP, 50mx, TOE BOULDERS 8a 88 a g8 88 Q � Pq o°Oa K LIGHT 8 ,ems TH 0 aD a� o 'r^ i T IGHT 40'— i/ D i I a$Og O � 88 r o So O OPOSED o off � C� D vEWAY EX15TING DRIVEWAY aD L O 4 FONDULAC OUTCROP STONE STEPS, OR LGHT ��I° CHARCOAL GRANITE OUTCROP O EXT SION 0 e° °� apH (APPX 37 STEPS, MAY VARY ON x �0� a UP °g°8 L IG � HEIGHT OF EACH STONE STEP) O LIGHT ��-1 Pa T J 0 525 LF RUSTIC MNT STONE EDGER, OR FONDULAC x ppk�,4m'L8 SF H.C.) (.) "CP L H 0 _--- 01 �S •S � � IGH T LIGH mo 1jp�%� J Ll aD �/ / ° ga 8 � 125 5� 1 P �a �J IGHT UP— OIGHT I aT T Ro G X 4g0 I LGHT JIG T J o LIG T LIGHT ° ° °ro s 8 r GHT . O �W IG PAT AT� S 0 j� � O LIGHT LI HT I � � 0 O IGHT V I UP+ LIGHT P p LIG S.d LIGHT 95 0 LOWER WALL 501L X <41H (85 SF H.C.) LPG r O� UPPER WALL 12m'L X <41H (2mm SF H.C.) (� (� co °d P UP FONDULAC CUT LIMESTONE TRAILS (50 / 25) : 75 SF x+T LIT LIGHT 4' FONDULAC OUTCROP STONE STEPS, OR CHARCOAL GRANITE OUTCROP 0 UP (APPX 18 STEPS, MAY VARY ON HEIGHT OF EACH STONE STEP) '14tY"d LIG Up 0 LIG LIG N O N N O >+� O C� N elof a � r r r- f � r 6!) 110 tvfAft 7 opQ,�i n C) leis + 3jJq'' � ----A - �p-.41-- s e, coo &NSO (G H IA� k itc, ee, , ev ihsi . vpw �Q - , C4A�rn; +( �vtTiil LAOU:5 �0.i� 1 t,J/'�G�wilt 5 '3N" uc 5�'wr roS1�j r Tyr. ter. r f. J6 •�P-?4irL air a, k Tom- ��ti_•—�-f-, T L M1 • snesccy�� c� Per ma jol U( C, �� hjA � ----- _1� 1 J Aop M, Jt � r ip m r s f pr pp five d J - �jor -� 4 Y r - L ' r• z v —.— .,4t — R RAJ -.- - `�:' l •ate _ ti ~ � 7 I F + �e � a ._. a � � . �— — t as � * � a y a * • •,r � T , } 1 r f 1 ' ' #'w� # F I IP 1 1pi e I I IF i r L + i l 7 1 � i 4 LO cc TMI I t k L I F r l i t■ P, ....... M.�% �■"� h���F �rwrR •�a.�� .00� .dpo�.0100�zoo i I r Y { i Ilk} ` ti •IL I i 1 .� 5 I I ] S,1 Jcq)r� Le5' c I �T � �•�\V41 arm � �. a. �_- �: • .tea 4' i I • l • I ' 1 r I ' - 9JI . i 1 1 r r " � w 9 d F S t L PROPOSED CONDITIONS c lcccu,.n I _ ,z e --:A s9 54`I4 eExc,a n4RKv�., 5EIBACK5SSTREeT i}1/ sv; // / o �'e«+_\ Cir,�e a}M1 /" >s LAKE nw�-enwn nxn moe�ec ._ /n>E K ��uo TR'�'T A y i Ell — TRACT D sR9'IS 14 E 251 09 zs PLAT > �; A,d^ LAKE MINNETONKA — m�� CARMAN BAY E 2 \\\\\ ` [. °r w.T III—aaFs nnia2(av�wss) Dx o a o aemrMM eYszuewnya.�.em... r�mm.wm�me.wu,�.menla el krana evr.iwa )iameC yofomnotmnnemro en. _—DIP 1� I17 ry EC NB x ps e a SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. a, 0 1400025THAVENUENORTH.SUITE120 ORONO, PLYM 0 LII=1� °T8°0°° MINNESOTA SURVEYLEGEND ®P PoN PPE 11 I"E °® = P -E=r aTi F�ry _ -LI aowPao o ®_ 4ae rvrviT° �— ° rv° _ER MaL a°. 0 w °°T °LE — — ®� -- © L ° mIALIE _ AD =aL °°a� °ry IALIE s w .rvo a- ry CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY Na 2 PREPARED FOR- HOME REFLECTIONS 2 OR 2691 ETHEL AVENUE, ORONO MN 55391 BENCH MARK 932.7 SETBACKS= 3m' STREET Im' SIDE 3m' REAR 75' LAKE -------------------------------------------- GROSS PARCEL AREA 33,836 SF HARDCOVER ALLOWANCE 25% // 8,459 SF -------------------------------------------- SQUARE FOOTAGE HOUSE 2,366 STOOP 144 EXISTING DRIVEWAY 3,33m PROPOSDE DRIVEWAY EXTENSION 37m PROPOSED DECK &STAIRS 924 PROPOSED FRONT PAVERS 19m PROPOSED GARAGE 25 PROPOSED PAVERS OUTSIDE DECK Sm PROPOSED STONE STEPS LAKE 223 PROPOSED STONE STEPS GARAGE 96 PROPOSED FLAGSTONE 75 PROPOSED STONE WALLS 612 TOTAL PROPOSED HARDCOVER 8 435 PROPOSED % HARDCOVER 24.94% J J o t) 0 o U ._ Q WALL 8'L X 1.5'H WALL 14'L X 6'...2'H WALL 6'LX2'H (65 SF H.G.) O FONDULAC OUTCROP STONE STEPS, OR CHARCOAL GRANITE OUTCROP (6) 175 SF TRAP SAND TRAIL WITH I m OLF RUSTIC MOUNTAIN STONE EDGER ._ 0 U 0 cn + D LIGH LIGHT = 0 0 LIGHT qq UP PAT P� P4T UP J LIGHTT IGH aD OaT W 00 UP UP UP @ OO LGHT ,� IGHT LIGHT UP D T a THO UP i � a D v LIGHT P H � � LIGHT 7 LIG 0 4 Pp LIGH PAT LIGHT HT "6 °°$o oso �°�° �O � Oi a O �° r 0 ° oo 3° ❑ BLACK HILLS SPRUCE (5) 8 FONDULAC OUTCROPS THROUGHOUT THE ° o� OL LANDSCAPE (22) g° + LIGHT a 6' FONDULAC STONE STEP K s MOUNDED SOIL \ ap s° C +UP 14) H ; ° HT moos a LIGHT T ° o 8a 8 SHORELINE RESTORATION. APPX 30 LN FT TO CODE LI H O DOg �00 —� 4m' o° o0 FIELDSTONE BOULDERS WITH RIP RAP, 50mx, TOE BOULDERS 8a 88 a g8 88 Q � Pq o°Oa K LIGHT 8 ,ems TH 0 aD a� o 'r^ i T IGHT 40'— i/ D i I a$Og O � 88 r o So O OPOSED o off � C� D vEWAY EX15TING DRIVEWAY aD L O 4 FONDULAC OUTCROP STONE STEPS, OR LGHT ��I° CHARCOAL GRANITE OUTCROP O EXT SION 0 e° °� apH (APPX 37 STEPS, MAY VARY ON x �0� a UP °g°8 L IG � HEIGHT OF EACH STONE STEP) O LIGHT ��-1 Pa T J 0 525 LF RUSTIC MNT STONE EDGER, OR FONDULAC x ppk�,4m'L8 SF H.C.) (.) "CP L H 0 _--- 01 �S •S � � IGH T LIGH mo 1jp�%� J Ll aD �/ / ° ga 8 � 125 5� 1 P �a �J IGHT UP— OIGHT I aT T Ro G X 4g0 I LGHT JIG T J o LIG T LIGHT ° ° °ro s 8 r GHT . O �W IG PAT AT� S 0 j� � O LIGHT LI HT I � � 0 O IGHT V I UP+ LIGHT P p LIG S.d LIGHT 95 0 LOWER WALL 501L X <41H (85 SF H.C.) LPG r O� UPPER WALL 12m'L X <41H (2mm SF H.C.) (� (� co °d P UP FONDULAC CUT LIMESTONE TRAILS (50 / 25) : 75 SF x+T LIT LIGHT 4' FONDULAC OUTCROP STONE STEPS, OR CHARCOAL GRANITE OUTCROP 0 UP (APPX 18 STEPS, MAY VARY ON HEIGHT OF EACH STONE STEP) '14tY"d LIG Up 0 LIG LIG N O N N O > +� O C� 4 CO Ca elof a � r r r- f � r 6!) 110 tvfAft 7 opQ,�i n C) leis + 3jJq'' � ----A - �p-.41-- s e, coo &NSO (G H IA� k itc, ee, , ev ihsi . vpw �Q - , C4A�rn; +( �vtTiil LAOU:5 �0.i� 1 t,J/'�G�wilt 5 '3N" uc 5�'wr roS1�j r Tyr. ter. r f. J6 •�P-?4irL air a, k Tom- ��ti_•—�-f-, T L M1 • snesccy�� c� Per ma jol U( C, �� hjA � ----- _1� 1 J Aop M, Jt � r ip m r s f pr pp five d J - �jor -� 4 Y r - L ' r• z v —.— .,4t — R RAJ -.- - `�:' l •ate _ ti ~ � 7 I F + �e � a ._. a � � . �— — t as � * � a y a * • •,r � T , } 1 r f 1 ' ' #'w� # F I IP 1 1pi e I I IF i r L + i l 7 1 � i 9 I t k L I F r l i t■ P, ....... M.�% �■"� h���F �rwrR •�a.�� .00� .dpo�.0100�zoo i I r Y { i Ilk} ` ti •IL I i 1 .� 5 I I ] Jcq)r� Le5' c I �T � �•�\V41 arm � �. a. �_- �: • .tea 4' i I • l • I ' 1 r I ' - 9JI . i 1 1 r r " � w 9 d F S t L DRAFT Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 18, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 6.5 LA24-000067, NORTHSTAR RENOVATIONS LLC, 2691 ETHEL AVENUE, VARIANCES The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and approve the request for a new average lakeshore setback variance for a new deck and steps that differ from a deck and steps approved by a different variance in 2023. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff and the applicant, Eric Brandt, Northstar Renovations LLC. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 9:21 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 9:21 p.m. Commissioners said they agreed with staff that the adjustments between variance requests were minor. Kirchner moved, Ressler seconded, to approve LA24-000067, Northstar Renovations Llc, 2691 Ethel Avenue, Variances. VOTE: Ayes: 7, Nays 0. 171 AGENDA ITEM Date: March 10, 2025 Item: 19 Title: LA25-000004, 3545 Ivy Place, Average Lakeshore Setback Variance - Resolution 7567 Presenter: Melanie Curtis, Planner Section: Consent Agenda Purpose: This item contemplates an average lakeshore setback variance for a new home. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline: This application was received on January 20, and considered to be complete on January 27. Therefore the 60-day review period will end on March 28, 2025. 3. Background: The new owners of the property were granted an average lakeshore setback variance for a new home in August of 2024 (file LA24-000037; Resol. 7500). Since that time, they made minor adjustments to the house plans resulting in small footprint changes and, because the average lakeshore setback greatly impacts the property, new variances are required. The previous variance application did not identify an abutting neighbor on the north/east side, so the measured distance between the lake and the western neighbor, at 3535 Ivy Place, was applied to the subject property as the average lakeshore setback (Section 78-1279). However, the updated survey submitted for the current application shows an approximate 18-foot-wide connection between the subject property, and 3570 Ivy Place across Ivy Place making it the second adjacent lakeshore neighbor. The updated survey (Exhibit B), shows the revised average lakeshore setback line bisecting the proposed home. The subject property and 3535 Ivy Place each face the cove; 3570 Ivy Place fronts the Lake; the rear of the home faces the cove. Please refer to the Planning Report for a full analysis. 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment: At their meeting on February 18th, after the public hearing the Planning Commission voted 7 to 0 in favor of recommending approval. Public Comment: We received comments from one neighbor with the primary concerns having to do with construction and safety on the Ivy Place roadway 6. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Council should move to adopt Resolution 7567 approving the average lakeshore setback variance. 172 Exhibits A. Resolution 7567 B. Survey Plans C. Footprint Comparison D. Neighbor Comments E. Aerial Photos F. Draft PC MInutes 173 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7567 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-1279 FILE NO. LA24-000037 WHEREAS, on January 20, 2025, Mark Ferry and Elizabeth Flynn Ferry, a married couple (hereinafter the "Applicants"), applied for a variance from the City Code for the property addressed 3545 Ivy Place and legally described as: Lot 1, Block 1, Casco Cove, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the "Property"); WHEREAS, the Applicants made an application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow the construction of a new home lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line; and WHEREAS, on February 18, 2025, after published and mailed notice following Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were allowed to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on February 18, 2025, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance; and WHEREAS, on March 10, 2025, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variance as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: Al. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above -mentioned meetings, and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. A2. The Property is located in the LR-1 C One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. A3. The Property contains 0.93 acres (40,840 square feet) in area and has a defined lot width of 270 feet at the OHWL and 245 feet at the 75-foot setback from the OHWL. 174 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7567 A4. According to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District regulations, the Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25%. A5. The Applicants have applied for an average lakeshore setback variance. A6. In considering this application for a variance, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: B1. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance ...." The Property includes difficulties in its topography, the utility easement encroachments, and the orientation of the adjacent properties and homes. The average lakeshore setback variance will not further impact views of the lake for the adjacent property to the south. According to the plan, the neighbor's view of the lake will be improved on the west side. This criterion is met. B2. "Variances shall only be permitted ... when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan." The proposed variance to build a new home on the Property is consistent with the comprehensive plan. B3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. The request to permit a new home in the proposed location within the average lakeshore setback appears reasonable considering the neighboring home locations, the shape of the Property, utility easements, and topography. The new home will improve the view of the lake for the neighbor to the south compared to the existing condition. The neighbor to the northeast will not be impacted in any way. b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The utility easement, plus the shape and orientation of the neighbors' properties and homes result in no legal building envelope. The new 175 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7567 home shape and location will offer an improved view of the lake for the affected neighbor to the south. The circumstances are unique to the Property; and c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality." The variance is requested to permit the construction of a new home in a similar location that will not adversely impact the neighborhood's character. B4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. B5. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78." This condition is not applicable. B6. "The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." This condition is not applicable, as a single-family home is an allowed use in the LR-1 C District. B7. "The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." This condition is not applicable. B8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." The Property's unique orientation to the lakeshore and the adjacent homes create difficulties for the Owners to improve the Property consistent with the homes in their neighborhood. B9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located." The Property's unique shape and the extreme setback of the adjacent home on the "flag lot" create difficulties for the Applicants. B10."The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." Granting the average lakeshore setback variance is necessary for the preservation of the property rights of the Applicants. B11."The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter." Granting the requested variance in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 176 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7567 B12."The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." The requested variance is necessary and does not merely serve as a convenience to the Applicants. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow construction of a new home lakeward of the average lakeshore setback, subject to the following conditions: C1.Council approval is based on the entire record and the above Findings. C2.The approved project shall conform to the survey dated 01/27/2025 by E. G. Rud & Sons, Inc., and building plans submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A & B. C3.Amendments to the plans that do not conform to City codes may require further review by the Planning Commission and City Council. C4.Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A building permit must be obtained within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (March 10, 2026). C5.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 10th day of March, 2025. CITY OF ORONO: Bob Tunheim, Mayor ATTEST: Christine Lusian, City Clerk 177 BL � 12- 9z �-"imAn28 On - a �o_ °�2.z0m H f>6O ae3,z;;g"3E F"a- �=m s a a _ O W Z a�aO sG S"�a--'^"a3 ms 31 0 o��y O fA M 'a"' a-°a"z"3qa� - as""O _ -Z w a g"R.aos<3xE' a-y„O0 C p °ya�ay C F �y a°.g&'^a°$aC'2R7 ss �..ZZ�F2y oFo ���� _' o6.m 3 r> A A "n tea." �,ao - -3°'a gg oa° 'a - ° Z r_"P. �°Qa =§ss; �a'g""oa �_ y y 0 yo VJ - ez: a^ j � a.'_ U;a ol 0 m Eea "pooR mfN '^O a°^�CA m �6AP p�-----_x_x_x_x_x_x_xx- �HHH H �'=r '2' _omoaGj%mFOnvxoyo,y_cziF�g<zo� ���°3"m°""�as8x8^°<o�DzmDMU-moK�°=4'"o �R=F i FAR": i g Co x 0 N E Tp �.4 a -H" RON z zzzHR5NOGV°29) pp.�S "z � «d" « « o'ism : it `o,°r°o" +,+++-+z", v, a��oAl In* A i —z.zmo n=ag2 „=3" CL aigri nnn zmF^8� ® ®ae.o \\ 0 LJ LJLJLJ O t3 'C ° Qm�°$z `' ° o`n� oz ° m mmmz Syz°myPo�a ^@�r z �hqH o �Os3°"zlngo oyaoso°�� �n'a�- °�5�.�,�wmoGpo �w ���xCD `a Z iR "wM�Pmm��= ao i=yrF =�w= 0 ^mw= _ O 3�000 §. o��N gm Fnoo ,°,nKBm "'y,o�"o o " 3 8 n 3 3 z' §:�` F"G g =_3 ,°° s 3 =59 s® �adog°mfqp n;$ozm :""P�orF $-or Am 'a z=� n �� mz�m°p �r� ^o„"=7C m F P w P z A m z o°�g z r mm G ors e�Nlo d x w 6L� w D �Z�r o z w�Z �Z N � � N O FT O 70 � z � z m rp s• a� LA r7 rpA o c s„r - rA o m m o .o 3 � x - m 30 A z 210=. o r Ro. 3z o fr m�a _ n 4i— m� ^ b O r p O 3 A o O 71 < bFm ❑❑❑ _ W Ok T \ O p O H ml 3 3 p (S' L � i•. i•. i•. v xx x x .xxx a am ......... cm o �rzo �0000OOONOO () �, t9N�l0�NAUDN�, _ mOm�mmjOOr< m m ♦o a �zoozorAm>> tf+c�i+Nmc9<mc90o zN Z O r Q o m x iEET N0. New Residence For: _ BRV E LEMItER * ARCfilTL'CT -" -- ,.,,,,i.A•�,. a`...�' X Builder: :,- '= 3908 Georgia Avenue North Crystal, MN 55427 ,,. AS NOTlD Phone 763 607-0516 • email: astrigal®gmail.com EXTERIOR ELE ATION9 os le MEET N0. New Residence For: "T'z.. N °:: BRVCE' LE KER ARCfilTECT Builder: '= 3908 Georgia Avenue North Crystal, MN 55427 �E. AS NOTlD Phone 763 607-0516 • ema B: as trtgal®gmail.com EXTERIOR ELE ATION9 .°' M — F TO 6 - i� n ,� mo 5 u - a m m A .m _ w I /R =x - m A opA. , w a p 5 r s __ m 6 "1o 5' O m N. :o - : N ,. .................... . i : m 0 o m mA e u rp a r z : lo' o � m b o _ - � c N. z 0 O s A .. ❑ x " d m a .._........ ... .... ..__.__. ._A.9. _.__........ .... . v _ sl z ' ❑ b A o Sx O a < m o y _ ^ n a r O p u b o T u n m A a 'n • a s - O •5g1• i lo' a z k _ ......... 0 u 0 a ° m m m N � nr al : me x - d r cn o 'O � :� , ° ,m Qom 5'_�• - Cm ee o s. ffc mso mo A � m fEU a �B "� .a-avz m: 1 m - o I/Y N m - 9s N m� w o£ 0 O € o ,m m m --- - X- N io eou5r SM ' vne c re : A r ° x m o• nr a>r u :< r og x � . mm m® `--- - r __ _... z a .� r m= - ^= la "' al zi m e ame mess z o a� Oro FA Fz� ` 3TO a o• o cna� 02 0 4 H. _ca- o; b H. - 3/5" z am ou a m S " _ c III 9� > b a$�p ��_ x III � .gym - 4 o A= oor . Q s �llo a, �A OZ= Lill e r� TO M x�0 a m zp ------------ E SHEET NO. New Residence For : rLTqq-rcKKT : .; BRVCE LEpRRR ARCpIT�CT Builder '� 3908 Georgia Avenue North Crystal, MN 55427 I,. AS NOTlD Phone 763 607-0516 • email: astrigal®gmail.com LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN .' M I Io G� 61EI'loc, W F F� is M ----------- --- ----------------- P----------- TIme Em mu �z O > ............. ......................... ............ 171 2, 'c' < T 5 r-p �g zmc 71 ------------------ -- 0 0 s. ao T Pm '-0 TI 11. Q1 F. ETY . ....... . . .......... M : I T ' rrr III T= : �0: o - a -M > ............. ... ........ ..... ........ .... .............. am m ;HEET No' New Reside— For: rLTqq-rcKKT 'LEHRER * ARCHITECT B u 11 d e r E 3908 Georgia Avenue r4.rlh Crystal, MN 55427 AS NOTlD Phone 763 607-0516 email: astrigal@gmall.com �C�A T�I:: 01/13/24 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY --for-- NORTON HOMES --of-- 3545 IVY PLACE ORONO, MN 55391 EXISTING PARCEL DESCRIPTION (PER HENNEPIN COUNTY CERTIFICATE OF TITLE NO. 1364929) In the following described land situated in the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota: Lot 1, Block 1, Casco Cove Subject to utility easement as shown on plat; Subject to drainage and utility easements as shown on plat; Subject to drainage and utility easements as contained in the dedication clause and shown on the plat of Ivy Estates; Subject to mineral and mineral rights reserved by the State of Minnesota; (Now as to part of above land) Subject to building restrictions contained in deed Doc. No. 478968 as referred to in deed Doc No. 524728, (Now as to part of above land) EASEMENT NOTES - The utility easement shown on the recorded plat of CASCO COVE (Recorded in 1988.) is the same as the Utility and Access Easement per Document No. 1630932 (Recorded in 1985). The plat does not identify the utility easement as Document No. 1630932. Utility Easements per Document Nos. T87696912 and T876942 (Recorded in 1967). were not depicted on the recorded plat of CASCO COVE. All three easements descriptions are based on the underlying Plat and Registered Land Survey and were computed accordingly. NOTES - Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 5/03/24. - Bearings shown are on Hennepin County Coordinate System. - Parcel ID Number: 21-117-23-13-0016. - Curb shots are taken at the top and back of curb. - This survey was prepared without the benefit of title work. Additional easements, restrictions and/or encumbrances may exist other than those shown hereon. Survey subject to revision upon receipt of a current title commitment or an attorney's title opinion. - The 100 Year Flood Elevation was established by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. - Contours within the surveyed premises are based on field shots. - Location of utilities existing on or serving the surveyed property determined by: - Observed evidence. - Markings requested by E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc. per Gopher State One Call Ticket No. 241100725. - Record drawings provided by the City of Orono's engineering department. - Excavations were not made during the process of this survey to locate underground utilities and/or structures. The location of underground utilities and/or structures may vary from locations shown hereon and additional underground utilities and/or structures may be encountered. Contact Gopher State One Call Notification Center at (651) 454-0002 for verification of utility type and field location, prior to excavation. - There was underground sanitary sewer marking from the southerly sanitary sewer manhole towards the adjacent house. There was no line observed coming out said manhole in that direction. - See Existing Conditions Survey for existing house and other topographic features. - Builder to maintain 7.5 feet of ground coverage over existing watermain with driveway. - Variance required for proposed house location with respect to adjacent houses proximity to the OHWL of the Lake. ZONING AND SETBACKS ZONING LR1-C, ONE FAMILY LAKESHORE RESIDENTIAL - 1/2 ACRES TREE DETAIL 931.81 DENOTES ELEVATION E929.2 WATER MHSAN EWATER �1 �)ti-------- DENOTES TREE QUANTITY II 929.4~rxR'11 �9°P���- ----- DENOTES TREE SIZE IN INCHES i1�` n --- DENOTES TREE TYPE 11.:: I..... 1 E3 931.62 FNDIPI/2 � 'O '� 931RI .79 O � FNDMON / O O w A W \ aO VDflN / O Q`A"'� ' - �4' p� ' Z Z o / �,-,?,Q pti 1J O x�r O ti� � 1 11 z �•1 '� oh(O \1 ��J, PI;r_ 0 Ihp� W C " Op mA ,> ,$� 7z� VIV - _ -7 / DENOTES TREE TO BE REMOVED i /'" a . I ��O Q1 �\ 1 / M z o � P 0 O� ti ' t / 11 EWATERi11 e'' / in O� �\ `P� \�� < - I I ..: , °NI' �Q �� . I 932.5 � \\ / 1 ♦ I / /'6� r r 932.6 ° �� 1 � ' \'- ) / r, 0b i ' ? : 0'•.... /�:' 9i 932X8 n�0, �, / 11 CENTERLINE 20 FOOT WIDE ,V EW9TE1,•..• GRAVEL �� �'4 �. / c2o,,,, / _ I/ ,'^ / UTILITY EASEMENT PER /hYY EMR\\\(" I AREA TO 33.3 8�\ ' -AVERAGE LAKE / DOCUMENT NO. 876912 -- -- 4 _+ ,', ,... ,REMAIN 9. //" / �8 SHORE SETBACK LINE <`r / / + + / 9. .5 %O 933:'2 \ / ) .\ +,lO +/�+ /�'�: I "Y�,'r 933:3I 192774 \ `x/ 7/ / 92 3 :'+ 1931. 2.2 \ '' .. �� \ i _o S INV / I o•<� �. \ S I O �� 90 s� \ x 1 Rio I� A I co 931.4\ /'c�1i0?sue c9� r / / I I p� 811 ' CS�� N, O + + / \/ O } 937.94 /8.31 • i •�j 1930I9 n IO \ •••9�s'2 TC3BIT-CURB r 936.6 FNDJLM FNDIP1/2 ,, r, i /I' 1 / ',/ \ x 931.9 I / / i n I DOCK -- . I � ..+ I / y� + I � I I - + / I W \ / I d I I : � I + + . N\ • O,S,� 6.4 x 937.8 \ / I 30.6 I 0) ' \ / ^ , n ` •"I + I + + PAVERS TO 938.5 / ^) Np II :' + x931L + REMAIN -� r \ 1 \^1 rnrn o NII I+ .. +I+ \ 9 I / N N 0, I11 : + I 'f� + + + x932.3;*' .\..' �Cb . 99 \ / 6 i 10 33 I \' Pi \ 9 � V' (' \1 ,Q Q\\\ = I J 11 : I + n/+ i I E) \ + + + PM O c 9.9 -4, \ / _ ^ / w O I _ I 11q+I 4�1 + I+ + Mom;':: ,y200 . Off ;:x941:3 ..... \�ftA 1 \ llJ r' •''}.•'' ..•'' \•..••' MAPLE-10' x942.7 �:/ (:/ t +I + I + \+ ; pl"z :' �M: � : A .,� � T 947.1 n r - i O) W o : 9a3:2 - " ^ 1 1.LL! LLi Q4 ROCK • N. ... < A3.� 944.z4 / 2 Q EWATER iI : H + + + +� j+ TERFALLS TO :' :j °��R� oas�9��•'\' _sf \ o r 9 FND]LM - _ ''^^ I I I O O BE REMOVED - :' I 942.6..•'' �A C3 of " ((I V I N ;+rti +, + O i' I' . 94.3:3 k s ' ,,•' \ '� Z SURVEY LINE + +: + xa� O +/ 931. i:'' "TREE-10" Gip` 9\\--*�- `T�" r // // - � III +q +I ,+ : `+ I +�, : '.: ,'...;'';'`:''; . 5�, / \ ,_ /• ' ` I~ :'/944:0 :' /m�Sr� 5 k�J \•' TREE-1447 -I '\ //i O OW � � F- + I+ :' + o y (/c�•�L Onk 24' : 5-•. - X, O.. `fig rC1 ' \ m ti . LL w : x 3q. I • a: . OFFF. PLE-s" '.� Sr0 Q V of o, I I + �F + + �\ :'I 9Nb' s .�s a ,v r / ` Q� owe / I'll- r rV I + +I :1 + +: + ; 43.:8: 4.0 _ 947.2 \ r^ O 43 N (1) n I I ROCK �1. VIA 958.41 V J 0) V- Q O I I :+ WOOD STEPS �L: MAPLE,-10" gd3'�,8 y . MHSAN / / I J �` W I A: I :' .•` :' . WATER �� gcie r '. ,P S U' LLi II O O I • I TO REMAIN -} h�' 947.-* �$ \ C(/ St. :FALLS � sd .9 Q / ti d' W z I �' , 931 7..: :' 941.9,' ` �y /.. 4 I MA ' E_6^_ T &OS O I 1 8" R F .� '9 948.5 L ^ r O 2 Q Z Q , H J I- 929.1 I .' r' : : - .- .24:r R • 4; 1 (/� + + + :+ 7 y . �� " O Ip„ T\ TC-BIT-CURB 1 /� V / //�� � Q ,y Q �:/ (n J H Z EWATER II a: v III I \ . �.r c-_'i' /� \ i ♦ x 1 /' Q J I'- W I :O I +I 'Y + + '; + 931. ' r i�:'tiy •1 :�.1 r : i• .... �6.. �V-% V:..vJ m W m:N I I )�., ::9 `.Z'x I '\ a 946.0 BWcg45.9 pw` 9�_.�\'.� •1. / Q I b:'+I ++ + �: : :° x 4 9 F.Z /`Q 4' d Z U j j D. 91 z 1 I : 9 1• .... 945.5 O&V 4g'S 8 O C \ Q� W H p I I .. ;y,' J x930.5 + + x931•:2:' :' fib..:: .: :�'l• Ogvj2(Q� �� �{6.O 01 ./� r!i / � � p \''...... O v v: �''. -7 OW W �n� U .1� II 1 + (T: + + � + ':+ .' /. m e e.. ,'I'2q,. `rQ 9 U y .'946.�i, .. i� � \ J O Q (/� Q 3 + :+ :'I + + + + 1.rn�p \ a2 /x946.1 ' 6.5 p o 10 / �� I b-:936.4rti I ii 0`�11 o ` + I + + F+XISTN ; : 9ay.9; : h �` x4 9 q6 m y 9 :a 9 9s1.6 �i/, r `�y / I : ; . . i MnrIE Zo'f I. p•.....^p CONCRETE :.., r� - 0 s L I ten:: SHE•Da e° PAD -- h 94 '.x F M LE 6" 9s ' + + 93I.+ + 9 s.p oI•. . \ 0• 6,7 .... ✓ 0 9 y 953. - S CENTERLINE OF 20 FOOT I I �I I ° f O 9al.z ::: : ::.::: ' p e� T S�\ .,..,;MAP 1 •o %L \ / WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT PER I I I + + +I ; 0� °� A9 R 1 DOCUMENT NO. 1630932 --- I I + li "mow: . SHED TO 'I . ` .. Nx 9� \\ `� � 1- \ do ti_ 1Q z9y2 r y 3 �2 \ / ---'� k AND PLAT OF CASCO COVE ----- I . �2. I -- . REMAIN 9 : � < �\ ;'.,,F h F o ti TRr h \r I 9 4.8 93 : m V ��• t� a• �9A QI ' ",953.7 CURB " 957.73 APPROXIMATE SEWER SERVICE II �n+_ N+ +; z+ +:: v 1r� \ O,c`;,� �Z` `� S �°� �O' y4 "\ FNDIP3/4UP.50 LOCATION PER CITY PLANS -i% : 94a.z'�° /� \�/•\I���� $O�� 1 ' 0� 11 +� I - - -I-- _ it_ ' A ,/O.•' �`�S ct, 00 '�,' 0 by \ �0'� \ 9sa.6 I 956.2 956.4 :.: , :. �I \ ® _ ' : : / (0' V 'S• 1.. 9 PINE-12 F .6" 929.1 f1 M 5.2-�__.__ i :-943.9 frn �y ti �0\ Q i •Y �! �..•. - EWATERII x9303 \ + . I : : : - p\\ QP 'S \' 'O `.b 9s - - ADJUST WATER VALVE p ; I + + .. . . •. ; aa`,; CREEN ' \ - O �,__ HEIGHT AS NEEDED S .• w rf .Co: \:' PORCH Q p11 j�; IIII/ 30. + :'+ I + +: :••944f. •`�� \'tlp /J 1� PROPOSED //�\\ 43 �y :'• \ z' 956.1 /11 r oyG O ICI 1 I T� +I +, + + ''l,: :. . TRE-j4��:.. o - /I ti HOUSE / \\ 16: ti��o s� \ i.' BI Gl7RB -1 ;� I + ; +/ + .,' ; � \ / / 6 \ O st O �� s6.4 ROCK CONSTRUCTION I n / A \ 6 9. •& PINE-12' THE SLOPE FROM THE OHWL OR w I : Its I m MAIN LOW / W. pg•' 1 'd �• -ice -`� h� ENTRANCE PER CITY v :+ o :+ + F: b ? b TOE TO A POINT 25 FEET ABOVE z N III : + I : I: 94q. x 6 ? , F ,,11 . O .o ti OQ °pi �. _ I n : . `• ' : a O FLOOR = 946.9 , \- Q• 'O �, p p .ass 57.3 r STANDARDS -' I + : RETAINING WALL : :v:: °� h \ O O a 4 L � 8 OHWL IS LESS THAN 30% AND 'n ^� n 1 �I : I _� ; . , \ 0�O ;' .� 0 y O 5 \, LU N Ij I ` O1 +I � + ; + + + : TO REMAIN ti ---------- \ F : 3 v O 3 QO QS - f. .P O 957.9 O THEREFOR NOT A BLUFF. PLEASE I - 10: �946.6 \ O yo' Q� 3 �o ' ,} O \L \ 957957 .5 �9TC-BIT-CURB tiG SEE EXISTING CONDITIONS =O z Ijl + I I� v I :+ + +' i 1G \\ s� 33 ore IQ, O�' r ru1\Ell �' T I SURVEY DATED 6-18-24 FOR � O I + + ° 9z19, + M i'` O 4S ^ rb3 y G •r' , �'` 0 = o resa. ? /' ' x: I O p O y0 S i \ O O y Ii : 'L 6 FURTHER INFORMATION. - + --+--� _ O 6 � P �O � / \ v' t S y6 y O Ln ti ti � ss.o � Ijl: I I I - '%7 3--__. $ 'fo' o� O qQp �` O Pit �, \ 0 9 ey yb o� ya'�5 PINE S I I : 1 I I j i-- ti �Q JS �`' a yy �] a� �b i \: hg. \ EWAT Po ' +I + + f I + % �: ,/ , ( , R ,/ ��b ,GHQ, �I,X" O �o\° O A I + - + :' ; . le5 �� / O _�\� 0�1 h47 958.38 958.6 I :IT 9�0LL . r : S . Z� /, : • / 9h0 Xi P ., IV 6?3 a a+ �1 \FND-1/2IP 9g8 -BIT-CURB III : M� i �F v UPPER GARAGE is 9 9 O y�• �... 92-.a + `�+ MpP E za 943.1.• X �/ .,� ,t, .;� 5 1 g5• 1-�e g6• - .959.2 n I :.' oMi d ' �9 O ,/ FLOOR=956.5 /fro ' e e /9586''' TOTAL LOT AREA ABOVE OHW....................................... 40 840 S.F. : I+ + : + +/. +:' M : : . . t , / . ( ) I o X ti / x o 1�. 0 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE FRONT (LAKE SIDE) .......... 75 FEET FROM OHWL EXISTING HOUSE, GARAGE, PORCH & STOOP .................... SIDE STREET ................... 15 FEET (IVY PLACE) EXISTING DRIVEWAY...................................................... INTERIOR SIDE ................ 10 FEET AREAS EXISTING PAVERS.......................................................... REAR YARD ...................... 30 FEET OUTSIDE OF EXISTING CONCRETE...................................................... THE 75 FOOT EXISTING DECK AND STEPS ............................................. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ..... 30 FEET SETBACK EXISTING WOOD STEPS AND WOOD PATIO ........................ MINIMUM LOT AREA .................. 0.5 ACRES EXISTING RETAINING WALLS ........................................... MINIMUM LOT WIDTH ................. 100 FEET EXISTING ROCK WATER FALLS ......................................... EXISTING SHED............................................................. - LOWEST POSSIBLE FLOOR ELEVATION 933.5 FEET (NGVD29) AREAS EXISTING PAVERS.......................................................... (2 FEET ABOVE MINNEHAHA CREEK WATER SHED DISTRICT WITHIN THE EXISTING GRAVEL AREA .................................................. FLOOD ELEVATION OF 931.5 FEET NGVD29) 75 FOOT EXISTING RETAINING WALLS ........................................... SETBACK EXISTING ROCK WATER FALLS ......................................... EXISTING WOOD STEPS AND LANDING ............................. (10'4" POURED WALL WALKOUT) PROPOSED ELEVATIONS FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION = 957.5 TOP OF WALL = 956.9 UPPER GARAGE FLOOR = 956.5 MAIN LOW FLOOR & LOWER GARAGE FLOOR = 946.9 TOP OF MAIN LOW FLOOR FOOTING = 946.6 GOLF ROOM FLOOR = 945.6 GOLF ROOM FLOOR FOOTING = 945.3 I'I I I + I ' ' aa'Z m 0 .'$ . V y6 �O yb ; ..m�•..R � a4z. .� \ rn O of• 9 5 y 9 3,237 S.F. �II • + ' I+ .rr) .: ;OAK. AD?-2 . 4.7 ' b .96 p�\i�0`r / �70 �:' may. : �\ . o y(O OQO4� eoo 63 .''// LM . •x 930.0:' i y d ,°J �-• : "� J ti• .'958.0 L,884 S.F. 91 :'i + II + + °' : 9 .o: a ��� y�' Ah '` poi x : Q Q- 9 / ; s: c %: .• ti 0''' •. I : + 1 : I p' 1 0 �/1 / 7i �� O 0'1�� y6. O O 956.2 �.'' ' �� �� IV 555 S.F. I I: I '. ;o `:% L r d e o' �J O° + +I +.' /''' 1/ x 933.3': �� . `�1945.3 . Q 9S i a y�' O ^i .,' •v� 272 S.F. 929.2 I } :943:9 : S i d° L� .' �6. 0J ,,.� /^ z''" 0 :ASHIDEAD. A n , 284 S.F. EWATER, :9 tI 4 �/9'1.8 SO 7i9' ': s 9g6 °P J �'�! / . Q 75 FOOT :: S '9 ^ ': 453 9y6 �Q /: ` \ !� tiA h^ 9sas - : 107 S.F. �/0?�1 I �^, ;OH'Wsy 4: �` e s :: \P�/ \ ,�5. °� °, / F. 929.2 � // ' + + / x : 01 i : m . .• q '. . 0� �L\\y, �o /� : 0 ?\ I' FND-1 2IP 88 S.F. //� :: ' [ 931.0 I 10 1 I �, , �•:" S'Z4 9A �i i \�s�s \ �✓ /' ; j �� o�yb / `,O 70 S.F. 92A.4+ jj 1¢'' I M M,4p h: _ O � 95a.8:• R / / .•1 ,A �' :.94i 5 94 Si <fi.I� '�• i Off; /: TREE-22" y i F qIN'........ + 10 l.d I M MAP E- // / a- y O o . / by qSF qG 50 S.F. I 111:.'' a v F �I ' +:� I M � 9h :'�o' °�4 /. 0� Op MFitr qNp 220 S.F. . c ` (° s U I \ o T 11 + 931. `i ' f¢ I O ,I, .'tip . V R /: O\ (7 / ,� .- 960.2 CQ F/� I�I I ,_Z I o a" . 0 5 1 / O / C,0 T/y .I e 1 / ' 68 S.F. 9 (O . �j \F 929.1 \� F 1 8.09 932.4 : 0, • Ch : b' , ' � �. 9i� .y Y . A,� 9 F W EWATER\ x NV O1 : pI X�l' ,1i i Jx O : ti. Q i / ( �'1• 78 S.F. +: +'' L : ,.� ,P , "°\ <s _ h-, �i� 6p'4 T \ \ C \ \ ' : : .� `�-1C^ ,. , -5 O 1P / 9h 00 .. 57.00 A_:J 7L %.'959.7 - 123 S.F. \{ 18yc _ ,934.7 ; :: :: ' :' : . � G<� -' • ti, gh O s y 47 /. 1 �f `,l:' 1 TOTAL EXISTING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ............................ 7 079 S.F. \ �' '' p �: O1 QQ v� �` `� :,SS '' y_ 3� \ �x , . o \v8° I \ .: :' .. P �4 Lt: J �'/��9�iXx :� / : V I ° �959.9EXCLUDABLE IMPERVIOUS COVER I•' ' :: :: /t a�\. 1RETAINING WALLS (43 S.F. + 68 S.F.) ............................... 111 S.F. F 9��rg3�4I�•., �?�s\ E �3300 ,g'6.5 '�o� / ,�'°s9sA / .. \ p• z S 928.20' m: h \ NET EXISTING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ............................... 6,968 S.F. EWATER \\ - • �9 ( �: S3 ' PERCENT EXISTING IMPERVIOUS ...................................... 17.1% 9z9.21--�` �'`� `z�dv:: '9/ 9 \ // . \ "' J. ��` MHSAN O /; EWATR •929.5�- .. : \ : ' t �✓ USAN'•: o �/' O x .3 IE ' . i / ' EWATER �� . Cr EXISTING PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE i I / ;� :'148x954''' m c� �� : GARAGE \ A❑ PROPOSED HOUSE, GARAGE, SCREEN PORCH &STOOP ........ 4,360 S.F. I /'/�°ti4 rb : I: / 1: '" ' ` 1' I j: "'��'� / �, ©PROPOSED DRIVEWAY...................................................... 2,342 S.F. i / 952. / \ 0ti I. : 3 $ •/ 9 ' : �y I 1 t' © PROPOSED PATIO (UNDER DECK) ...................................... 329 S.F. II� I 1- /Z IP AREAS / 929.5 1 : - - i N : ' j (?" ) - x :1 C \ / ; /FND 1/2 ❑D PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD AT DECK STEPS ........................ 16 S.F. EWATER 1 : :.: ://. ' - I : : : l I3,�-/� OUTSIDE OF E PROPOSED DECK &DECK STEPS NOT ABOVE PATIO &PAD .. 69 S.F. :z ` : I: 3,:'�3%\ ° � / I - \ THE 75 FOOT PROPOSED FRONT SIDEWALK ....( ....................................). 212 S.F. \ '~.O` �� \ �w - ::` ;. SETBACK .�/ z.z. / / ❑ / x I : ` `/ : '". I: I:` - - O 1:. EXISTING ©PROPOSED SIDE SIDEWALK .............................................. 108 S.F. 930.8 a/1 / O ,O HousE H PROPOSED WINDOW WELL .. 952.1 :� 9 S.F. 929.4 �1 / O / : 954.3 / 1� / :M EWATER I / CO ,♦ I� / x• / I❑ RETAINING WALLS (EXISTING AND PROPOSED) .................. 135 S.F. W /� ----------/ "i ____/-,. � : o�:z .: 957''%// rr 'T------------- �- .J EXISTING SHED TO REMAINAREAS.............................................. 70 S.F. J M'/ // p / ---- 136.0 ---- / :� 957.9 / // � � � _ :IT--------- ----- WITHIN THE ❑K EXISTING PAVERS TO REMAIN ........................................... 50 S.F. , '/ / I °,' l / s; 9ss.os � a DECK © EXISTING GRAVEL AREA TO REMAIN .................................. 220 S.F. / z / / o / 75 FOOT 2 i FND-REBAR12755 957.9 -x ❑M EXISTING RETAINING WALLS TO REMAIN ........................... 68 S.F. �' O /// // 957.s \\ AGILITY OPERATORS NOTIFIED W x 929.6 N / l , SETBACK ❑N EXISTING STEPS TO REMAIN ................ 111 S.F. ° i/ EWATER // I 0 / - `, K, U. launas in -TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ........................... 8,099 S.F. U II' /I / , EST.1971 EXCLUDABLE IMPERVIOUS COVER - WINDOW WELL AND I ., / // ' � / `-; Professional Land Surveyors RETAINING WALLS (135 S.F. + 68 S.F. + 9 S.F.) ................. 212 S.F. / ill // I / 6776 Lake Drive NE Suite 110 NET PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 7 887 S.F. www.egrud.com 7 ............................... o II // / -' Lino Lakes, MN 55014 PERCENT PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS ..................................... 19.3 /o ill /I/ / Y Tel. 1 1- 2 Fax 651 361-8701 ° I / I / `' �' e (65 ) 36 8 00 ( ) MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE IMPERVIOUS (25 /o) ......................... 10,210 S.F. \ L/929.6 .I / 959.0 TC-BIT-CURB CODE CORON001 CTLMN01 MINGAS05 MNDCBLO1 XCEL05 NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10 20 40 1 INCH = 20 FEET BENCHMARK MNDNR BENCHMARK- BRASS DISK SURVEY MONUMENT IN GROUND, 15 FEET WEST OF SWAL RIPRAP, 25 FEET NORTH OF CONCRETE CURB AT EXIT OF GRAYS BAY DAM AREA. ELEVATION = 932.7 FEET (NGVD29). LEGEND • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED 1 DENOTES FOUND PKNAIL OR SPIKE 0 DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS# 25343 (TO BE SET) O DENOTES FOUND JUDICIAL LANDMARK OCS DENOTES CURB STOP DENOTES ELECTRICAL BOX X 952.36 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES GAS METER (f/ DENOTES GUY WIRE Cob DENOTES POWER POLE SO DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DENOTES RETAINING WALL •' "•""'•"• DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS oHu DENOTES OVERHEAD UTILITY DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE -GAS- DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE CHL DENOTES UNDERGROUND CABLE LINE > DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN DENOTES UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOCUMENT NO. 876942 DENOTES UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOCUMENT NO. 876912 DENOTES UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOCUMENT NO. 1630932 AND PER THE PLAT OF CASCO COVE F__ ---I DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE L- -_ � DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE L_ _ . J .- T DENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE _ _ DENOTES PAVER SURFACE + + J DENOTES 100YR FLOODPLAIN _S_ DENOTES SILT FENCE DENOTES PROPOSED RETAINING WALL DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS soo.o DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE E DENOTES WOOD HUB/METAL SPIKE AT 11 FOOT OFFSET (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) s DENOTES SILT FENCE ❑A DENOTES KEY LETTER TO PROPOSED HARDCOVER WORKSHEET AT THIS TIME ONLY THE TREES WITHIN THE POTENTIAL AREA FOR NEW HOME CONSTRUCTION WERE LOCATED. THE TREES WITHIN THE 75 FOOT OHWL SETBACK MAY NEED TO BE LOCATED AT A LATER DATE. I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. (PER GOPHER STATE ONE TICKET NO. 2411007251 COMPANY NAME MARKING CONCERNS DAMAGE CUSTOMER SERVICE CITY OF ORONO (952)249-4680 (952)249-4600 CENTURYLINK - CTLQL (800)778-9140 (303)260-4929 CENTER POINT ENERGY (812)483-7923 (612)321-5200 MEDIACOM (800)778-9140 (845)443-2840 XCEL ENERGY (800)848-7558 (888)968-9235 (952)429-4680 (877)366-8344 (800)722-9326 (845)443-2840 (800)895-4999 An,- E. 7���. JAMS E. NAPIER Date: 01-27-25 License No. 25343 DRAWN BY: JEN JOB NO: 240376HS DATE: 05/06/24 CHECK BY: JEN FIELD CREW: JH-JR-CB 1 05/09/24 REMOVE 12% SLOPE SHADING JEN 2 06/12/24 ADD PROPOSED GRADING JEN 3 06/18/24 REV. IMPERV. & ADD KEY JEN 4 01/16/25 REV. IMPERV. & ADD KEY JEN 5 01/27/25 REVISED PER CITY COMMENTS JEN NO. DATE I DESCRIPTION BY S:\RUD\CAD\24PROJ\240376HS\240376HS.DWG 240376H%c 183 rLTNN Aff r E lK It T �;545 NY FL/,'\CE, OFONO MN RESIDENCE JAN 130 2025 PERMIT SET- REV15ION5: AP 51DING CEDAR TI$G 50FFIT— TYPICAL ALL ROOFS rimISMtD 54UARt r99TAGt SUMMARY FIN, LOWER LEVEL 5,F, +- 2350 15T FLOOR 5,F, 2690 TOTAL APPROX FIN15HED 5I.F. 5)040 5F m 3'-OSIN• FPgC1P PITC1 - OH 'STUCCO :: 8Xb :CEDAR; :ExP:O:S:ED: STUCCO �.. . ................................... ................... x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x X X X XXXX X X X X xxxx X x x X x x x xxxx xxxx xxxx x x x xxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx x x x X X X X x x x X x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x X x x x X x x x x x x x x x x x x x x xxxx xxxx xxxx x x x x x x x x x x X x x x x x x x X X X x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x STAINED x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x CEDAR K x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x PANEL x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x MAT�L xxxxxx xXxXxXxX xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxx xxxx x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x L x x x x x( x x x x x x x x x x 'X X X X X X X X X X x .CU5TOM IF.. MADE x x x x x x x x x x x x 5TAINED SMOOTH CEDAR c x x x x x x x x x x x :"RIBS", (2), 5EE DETAIL D/5,,xxxxx x x x x x x x x x xXxXxXx x.WRAPPED 2 51DE5 AND x x x x x x x x x x x x'DEAD END INTO 5TUCCO x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x �xx xxxxx x xx x xxxxx x x x x x x x x x x x xx x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x xx x x x x x x x x x x x x x xxxxx x x x x x x [�%Xvxvx x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x LAP 51DING STAINED CEDAR PANEL MA T'L IELD DETERMINE RETAINING WALLS V I t W t R9 M I V Y P L A C t 5CALE: 1/4" = V-011 UCCO r ►`_ Ir an — — - 18'-0"TO FIN15HED 5TUCCO 5CALE: 1 / 4 " = 1'-01I TUCCO 5'-01I 5NEET INDEX 01) ELEVATION5 02) ELEVATION5 2A) 5D VIEWS 05) LOWER LEVEL 04) MAIN LEVEL 05) 5ECTION5 06) 5ECTION5 07) 5ECTION5, ROOF PLAN 08) 5ECTION5 09) 5ECTION5 10) DETAIL5 CEDAR T$G HONEY 5TAINFD 5OFFIT5, ALL 5OFFIT5 0 N v� �Ln Ln Z E v � °_ U L E V s o Li Z .� lu i �O Q O Li & %0 V 0 M 00 O C m t ` `OT'A'ov'''. \ W SI lu L Vl Z .. Q L Q LL `J C L w 3 = � x z oo LU W IV N O 0 \ Z Z y \ � ao W W W J HJ co E.,L4mhitectumlCADDILDK13545 Ivy Place, Or , F"nFerry (Beth & Mark)IFenyF"n VP15.gxd -- 0111312025 -- 04:55 PM -- Scale 1 : 48 a LP DECK 5TAINED CUSTOM MADE CEDAR 5TAINED 5MOOTH CEDAR PANEL °RIB511, 5EE DETAIL MATI L CUSTOM MADE 5TAINED 5MOOTH CEDAR IIRIB511, 5EE DETAIL D/5. WRAPPED 2 51DE5 AND DEAD END INTO STUCCO 00 Ul 5TAINED CEDAR PANEL M A TIL -LAP SIDING L r r T 5 i D r r L r v A T i o n 5CALE: 1/41' TUCCO I �� 1-0 ItyIKdil ........................................... ....................................... ... .......................................... ....................................... . ........................................ ........................................ .............. nnl�lnl x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x iiiiiiiiiii x .................... ................... .................... .................... .................... x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x ............... .............................................. ........................... :.:......... ST.U.GGO ......................... . ................................ ........................................ V I t W t R 4 M T M t L A K C 5CALE: 1/4" = V-011 AP 51DING T LAP 51DING E.,L4mhitectumlCADDILDK13545 Ivy Place, Or , F"nFerry (Beth & Mark)IFenyFtynn-VP15.gxd -- 0111312025 -- 04:55 PM -- Scale 1 : 48 r n T R Y v i r al or, 0 MMMA IIP J. 00 0) V I r W t R o M L A K t . Kd pop c �� 1� T • - t� ! —iL 1 V Y P L A C t V I[ W v i r al T o r n T R Y NOTE: TESE VI EMS ARE FOR GENERAL PURPOSES SEE ACUTAL FLOOR PLANS AND E L E VATI ONS FOR THE E XACT CONDI TI ONS ._-w_ - - E.,L4mhitectumICADDILDK13545 Ivy Place, Or , F"nFerry (Beth & Mark)IFenyFtynn-VP15.gxd -- 0111312025 -- 04:55 PM -- Scale 1 : 48 co 4 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 8 8 8 7 7 6 6 6 5 5 5 15'-4 3/4" 4'-011 \ f30" DIA 30" DIA LOWER LEVEL NOTES. A/3 ) LOCATE FIREPLACE STUD WALLS 50 THAT THE FIREPLACE FIN16H ALONG THE 51DE BUTTS INTO THE WINDOW FRAME AND COVERS THE WINDOW FLUSH TREATED BEAM FIELD VERIFY NUMBER OF TREADS VERIFY CONCRETE PATIO FRAME BY 1/4" - 1/2" 14 I24 DIA 5/3) LOCATE THE 51DE WALL AT THE WINDOW 50 THAT THE 5HEETROCK $ FLUSH TREATED BEAM-1 0 COVERS THE WINDOW FRAME BY 1/4"=1/2" I MAINTENANCE FREE DECK 6TAIR5 C/3) PLACE THESE WINDOWS A5 CLO5E TO THE CORNER A5 POSSIBLE. FLUSH TREATED BEAM -J FYI I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- D/3) ENCLOSE LANDING AND FACE WITH 5HEETROCK. STAIRWAY To I DBL JST '1 I I I I I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' OPEN BELOW WITH CENTER STEEL STRINGER To SUPPORT TREADS � AND STEEL TUBE COLUMN TO SUPPORT THE MID -LANDING I i I ' I ' I ' I ' I ' 0 5EE ENGINEERING DRAWINGS FOR ALL DETAILS. t� I I I I I I I I I I I I o I STAIR RAILING TO BE CABLE STYLE WITH WOOD CAP, STAIN TO �� MATCH THE REST OF THE WOOD FINISHES. I I I I I I I I I I I I 36 I DIA 11 �' � � � E/3) 15X15 INDENTED SOAP NICHE, TOP AT 60 ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR (A.F.F.) 2*12'5 @ 1611 O.C. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - treated or equal I FWgH TREATED BEAM ' 30 DIA;4 F _ �36 DIA r -30" DIA ao 22'-011 DECK P05T $ FOUNDATION: i 8X8 CEDAR POST ON 18" DIA. CONC. '00 FILLED SONOTUBE FOUNDATION, BOTTOM 12'-3 5/8" TO CL 8X8 PO5T5 , F , _1 BELLED OUT, BOTTOM AT 60 BELOW FINISHED GRADE 15'-611 27'-011 11'-611 1 23'-011 1211 4'-11 1/4" 11'-4" I 9'-6 3/4" 14" 6'-5" 5'-1" 17'-10" 14" co I10'-7 1/4" _ 7'-7 1/4" 3'-5 1/2" 5'-4" O co co I _ a) to I � o r � 6050 FX 1 VERIFY 5H WER HEAD Ua -a 4 UNITS; 56X80 FX NOTE C/3r------------------------- ---------, DECK LEDGER a; _ SILL @ 3/4' a N ( N ABOVE CONIC FLR 1::----------------------------------------------------------------------� - - - - - - - - - r ..:.:.: -- - - - - - - - -; =" =" = " : 1 = = = N N +' 2X8 COMPOSITE STUDS 9050 3W C5 OXO - - - - - - - - 2650 FX 3050 C5 9x8 PATIO DOOR t0 - _ L - - r.. I w -- - -----------------------------------------"= - = - "="= - - - - - --= - - - _ _ _ _ ' FLUSH HEADER N r,.............. _ _ _ _ _ _ --- I Q, () L. - - - -• - - - - - - - - - - - - - L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I 2-4 VERIFY POINT LOAD 7 1/211 7 1/2" 1; v H 2-8 GLASS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ... --------------------------------------------- ;:I o .------ 3-2X10 CUSTOM :::::::.::.:: - - Q LU 6050 FX �_ BENCH POST FOOTING 41-111 T o -' C L 0 STORAGE : ----------------------------------------------- o SEE NOTE B/3 -------------------------� CARPET ABOVE r.............................................. c) N Wet NOTE C/3 I i I II WALKOUT ' ------------------------------- I u NOTE E3 I Baf NOTE A/3 ------------------------- BEDROOM 2 �_R 5 __-- BEDROOM 4 3 7 FaH 34 ABOVE CARPET VERIFY FLOORING ' CARPET Z - „I _ - N3050 C5 1z WER..................... DO 0 B • I ' ------ °C 3 -8 i _ LU FIEL DETERMING _ - 3I ..............� ................-------� :...... - i o � \ � .. .. .. .. � � PET INING WALLS ° ® (n CARD TABLE , 2-4 TILE _� i o ~ o�c VERIFY DESIGN ~ =01 CRAVE I SHOWER I LOOKOUT I , o '•BATH CLOo BATH 6� W. .... .�; oc 7260 , AND LOCATION ~ ' N - TILE 3'-4 1/2" P05T FOOT NG " TILE o o MEDIA ROOM , 2-6 CARPET i 4'-0 VERIFY FLOORING v N BEDROOM 3 _r _ -� o I o CARPET ® 2-2X10 + -RCS- - - - J 2-6 r.- .. - 42 I N ... ... .. B I L L I A R f,? 5 I� I - - - - - - - - - I 36 NOTE E3 I. _ ,. L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - :r. - - - - - - 2-4• I I ' H I.. DROPPED]: �: �: �: �:�: �: �:� z WALKOUT I r. - -�. - - - - - - - - - - J:: 1 N I:.:. - - - - f... 3-2x10 I Q -------------------------LO ' TX110 0 ................. .. .. ..._..........F. _....._ .............. ...................... .. ....... . U5TOM CABS - (n 12 -1 3/4 ,' „ 4'-9 1/2" 3'-11 1/2" 5'-3 1/2" 11'-4" 3'-10 1/2" 5'-8 1/4" """""""" ' .• I II 5T3 1 \x� �—DROP TRU55 TOP = 2-6 - DOOR FOOTING � � 5' 10 1/2" (LASS WALL Aj D lu 21 FQR �; I II - UP TO CEILING POST " GN I / \ ...... 21-10 1/2 STONE VENEER ' ROLL IN SHOWER 15'-2 1/2" 8 -0 7 -8 4 -2 15 -11 1/2 AT MAIN FLO - FROM MAIN FLOOR SHEATHING I - v /2-4 t r L''.AUND. WT WS _ S/ - - - - - _ - - - - - - '! 211 I AIR _ GOLF BAG j, o , \\ I 2 4 I EXCH FURN WH WH WINE POOL CUES - - - , FLUSH BEAM -rF- 6--6-- - IrHOLD- IN O O 3 11 r _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DROPPED BEAtuj::: I HOLD IN - - - - - - TILE TILE i i 2-8 o ROOM '_--------__------- r. .. i 48"X48" SOLID WOOD LANDING iL . , INSHOWER I I " FD _ I:: ----------- -=�__ __ __ _.. II 1/4 = . o TILE _ ._ _...........� -�."'"...... ==, -m OPEN -- - o I 9--6 3/4 I I T - - - 5 T E P D N ::t ::::: ,..:.:::�' -;i- BELOW 2 HOL -IN IL ZV I. I u N i VERIFY : I I I UNFINISHED - ........, - - - - - ' R D5 ;, (LINE OF R D IN6UL) W I C WINE 5 ORAGE UNIT Lo RETAINING I STACKED MECHANICAL A5 E BUYER POST FOOTING i 2611 ANDA49" _ „ R$5 I WASHER ' " ; ; V211 III, LANDING;, ' 4 -o 36" NOTE E3 L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J - - - - - - DRYER SUMP FIELD LOCATE MECHANICALS 5 -3 1/2 EDGE OF DROP - - L - :; O 7'-0 1/2" o : 3-0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. ., ; IN CONCRETE FLOOR 18"Dx36"H .... :DROPPED III -:,- -;r -;r - r - i AT CONIC 5 OFFIT -'- -'- -'- -'- OPEN TO ABOVE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - = I I I p X24"D ;� ;� 1OX10 STEEL TUBE 2:=2X10:: WALL HAN65 OVER CONCRETE BY 2 z O VIEWING ' FOR CERTIFOAM INFILLI ' '' '' COLUMN, ON 5TL O 11 ............. - ------------ - - - - -- (S -co ::GIRDERFORSI�-:L_;L_:L_'L --- - --- ' z COUNTER ' ' PLATE, NCHORED U r--;-------------------------------------- - ---------UPPERS- ---------.--- --- -.---- --� -8 2X6 BEARING WALL ;...... 5T I To CONIC. FLOOR O cv O AND SUPPORTING v " 3-0/7-0 STL DOOR 2 i " OPENING ' 18 D FOLDING COUNTER / OPEN TO SOLID WOOD LANDING 24" DEEP ;FOLDING (30 IN ER W/ CONIC LINTEL A5 N I m SUPPORT ABOVE Q PER ENGINEERING I 10'-2 1 2" FROM CONIC 10 CEILING 1 ;; III "'I"' 1OX10 5TL TUBE VERIFY-0/:7=0 DBL 5TL :DOOR ING 10-3 - • / � O VERIFY II^ " CANTER STRINGER W/ gQNC. LINTEL AS 4'-0" ' . • G O L R w v j FLOOR I SUPPTRT N6EEL LFLOATING o CONCRETE I 5 M U L A T 0 N Wool) CAP 3 1/2I THICK WOOD o SIDEWALK i I F'ER.:ENGINEERING I II O F F I C E RISERS, SEE DWGS F i FROM REAR TO - 10 (n VERIFY FLOORING N \y ' ' WALL 4GHER THAN III "" " U P „ r0 11 BY 5TRUCT EN6• 0 UNDER -GARAGE ' I 24 DEEP VIEWING G CTR. TO TE 'EN ' 5 EER 4 LEDGE STORAGE : II I E X E R C I pCOMPUTER...... •'; .. ,.... 1 E E NO RAILING 3 DESK 4 -0 4' -0 2 -1 FROM MAIN FLOOR SHTH III 9 I J I o `L . ,L N II 2 4' 1 AT CONIC LINEINI5HED : VERIFY WALL FINISH THIS ROOM 15 VENEER 9 FNOTE D/3 N (n — I EJ UNDER GARAGE STORAGE 8'-10" '-2" 10'-411 `� z FIELD DETERMING ro a II To - TO a� 10" - - - - - - - - ' III FEOMEAFBOV OW5 OWN _ O RETAINING WALLS Q :CONCRETE {=LOOK Q LU 22 1/2 r=_ - - -, - U D c TO FLOOR N o- 1 L CO _ I Q z , DROP _ -� Q :O •' t� _ ' r ------------------- ca 2" RIGID o' RIGID �< 5HEETROCK LEDGE r- _ ---- r� 4'"'LEDGE - ------ r --------- - Q O I 6040 EGRE55 = 11 , - m L _ _ - - _ J " 411 LEDGE N I = i O = 2 RI ID, O 2" RIGID 4 LEDGE - 2 RI61D - 6": CURB Q GLIDER - 4":LEDGE z�----------------- I r0 4 11 ~ LU z _ 0 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4'-10" 16 11'-8" 28" 6'-8" 2811 7'-811 28" 00 LU O 1 2" HOLD -IN I AT CONIC TO HO 1JE a)RB TO CURB5 TO CURB5 O w LU z ' I = 16 10'-211 1611 16" I T op LU 11 r _ _ _ r I WINDOW LU 2 HOLD -IN, THI5 SIDE Q ' , I1 I I i I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , WELL I OL-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- oil: 6" CURB I r------------------- �~ __ U 4" LEDGE 8'-10° Z °� L--:------------------r---------:-� 2" C TI AM AT CONIC ER FO EQUALQ L------------------------------�1012 NO HOLD -IN - - - - - -- L - - - - - - - r - - - - - - - - -•- - - - - - - - - T - - - - - - - - OZOR - - - - - - _ 7---•-------------------•-------------------•-------------------'-------------------' r----------------------------------------- ~� I I I ` - - - - - - - J N N L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J 3'-611 18'-011 3'-611 14'-0" 25'-011 9'-011 39'-0" LEFT HOLD -IN RIGID TO RIGHT GARAGE CONCRETE GAR, CONC TO HOUSE 5HTH II Egg 13'-811 33 -0 AT CONIC AT CONIC L O W E K L E V E L f L o o K P L A N DOOR5 TH15 LEVEL TO BE 6-8 HIGH (UNLE55 OTHERWISE NOTED). R.O.H. = 84" ALL WINDOWS TOPS TO BE 14 DOWN FROM CEILING UNLE55 OTHERWISE NOTED. SCALE: 1/ 4 II = 1 I _ 0 II 2 3 5 0 APPROX F A N, SF. WINDOW 51ZE5 ARE SHOWN IN FEET (5060 MEANS 51-011 W X 6-011 TALL) vU) � �L0 �- Z ` E vU � U V .00 L. � H 0 cd Lj Z .� IU i rill �O QLn O •qQ O LjL �0 V 0 M 0 C O m -c M CL LU C7W ♦ Cm _•up_ W ~ *+- ,0 0° DIY W lu L Z J MJ !nn- L O O J U- O C O �y L 3 O � Q Z m � W O I-- N O--.1 z z^ y \ W a O LU YI J LJ gn E.,L4mhitectum1CADDILDK13545 Ivy Place, Or F"nFerry (Beth & Mark)IFenyF"n VP15.gxd -- 0111312025 -- 04:55 PM -- Scale 1 : 48 00 00 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 8 8 8 7 7 6 6 6 5 5 5 11'-011 15'-611 27'-011 11'-611 4'-011 19'-0" 1211 AT 5HTH AT 5HTH 5'-4 3 16 10'-7 13 16" AT 5HTH AT 5HTH AT 5HTH AT 5HTH 12'-011 16'-011 4'-0" FIELD DETERMINE 14 - EQ EQ , N ==cz $ � `sCHASIE TO CEILING of �Op _I U O LU D N -� x CIDC3 LU o U VAULTED CEILING I I T$G CEDAR FIN15H „ co 22 -0 SCREEN PORCH LU o TREX DECKING 8X8 CEDAR POSTS, TYPICAL I I N O STUCCO FINISH ON ALL 8X CEDAR BEAMS 0 DECK EXP05ED INTERIOR WALLS w AT 2 LEVEL5, - OF THE PORCH, EXCEPT WRAP 3 51DE5. TREX DECKING lu 9016 TRAN50M I p FIREPLACE CHASE, WHICH 5EE 5ECTION5 MULLED TO I LU IS TDD BY OWNER 3050 3W C5 XXO I �� �- �� 6" PA15ED HDR - 3 6 7 0 N 3-0/8-0 CUSTOM SCREEN DOOR � 4 UNITS: LINE OF SEE SEC 10/8 = I 4656 FX, 5.5" SPACER CEDAR "RIB" - s 4646 FX, 5.5 5PACER 5EE DIET. D/5 O '" 4660 FX, RAISED 3/4" III; 8080 PATIO DOOR � > r N FROM 5UBFLOOR 14 3016 TRANSOM " `o " N FLUSH HEADER MULLED N 18 120 II ;I- i DOWN5POUT -- -- ----------------------------- �_66� C5 LINE OF WALL AT ROOF N - 6" RA15ED HDR r 7 1/411 _ : ; o ; ; I ; 16 TRANSOM OVIER III ; 5.5 SPACER OVER _ 7 1/2" 7 1/2" 6 1/411 - (VERIFY) GIRDER— 08 EL 16" T M OVER co III LINE0 "RID" OV 1 I l 12080 4 PAN RANSO - o PATIO DOOR " 3'-7" CEDAR 1 9 CEILING S HEADER IER 3046 2W XO ; III : ;, ; FLU H HIEA IE - L POST III '-0„ m _ 3 5 SPACIER OV '� 9080 3 PANE ' I' 6 RAI5ED HDR III: : o: 3' 1111 ' 2" 3' 2" ' 2' ' PATIO DOOR - _1 o :; 5EE SEC 11/8 _1 . ; - -8 1 -2 1 -10 1 INSTALL BACKING 12" OVERHANG FLUSH HEADER ........ ... 10' RAI5E' CEILING N: : Lc�z IN CEILING FOR 2 S1DIE9 i I 11 ONHROOF N — UPPER CAB CROWNS : _ _ _ _ : _ _ 24 -0 - _ __ ______ ___ if 0 W N E R 5 S U I T E III ;:• T0; SHEATHING AT ROOF ; v 4- ��6 P GROWN ------- CARPIET 6'' "RAISED CEILING, 1LI: I-:.:.:.:: :I 5HIPLA I$ C OW + I oc) 9' CLG i I ----------- _..__... - .....__--____---------------------------------------- --- _ 3046 2W XO o r... I 0- _ I LINE5 OF CHIMNEY CHA5E _ I; 2X6: RECYC': 9 OX5^6 I 5EE ROOF PLAN -------------- c9 6 RA15ED HDR : 1 qW K r:::: I BRA KETS , 5E 14 5EE 5EC 11/6 50AKING ROOF TRUSSES III; ; F:::: I ISLAND VERIFY ROOF GIRDER BAC ;II TUD II III i.... , $ @ 24 O.C. TYP. KIT RUTHERFORD - 9' CEILING 84" (.... _ ; ; (VERIFY DIRECTION) i WOOD r:::: i�il 1;42 -WOOD ;GAR ::I I BATH o I I ..: b:::d: ' I' cn : : HIGH VAULTED CEILING - TILIE -o III; 3-0 , DISP 1; v / o = BURNING FP - i ::: 10 CEILING W/ TAG CEDAR FINISH W VIERFY ROOF GIRDER-11 : ) ( ::: Q::COOKTOP °' SIINK DINING ROOM °L o DROPPED CEDAR BEAMS II: N -N .HOOD WOOD � [ct,), GREAT ROOM36"H WALLS, WOOD1GLA56 TO CEILING ; 9CEILING'•. :) r.::: Q 24D III H) (BOTH WALLS) DW 1 30W III : -- i F MICRO _ 40H 3' -8 1 2" 12" 7' 1011 1211 5'-2" csi -�° N P LINEN 6'-3" �i LU I ; 0� ZERO CAB - - - :#1'?S: ::----------------------------------------------------------- FLUE FROM ENTRYN N I III I N I -------------------- o I ------------------------------ , " ------ -fir------ BELOW 2 - N 5HOWER---------------11I�� -FLOATING FOOT LEDGE _ : i Ul:� T=Ifs:::::::: FA.NT:: :.P.AN:T :: I = } WOOD RIBS :;III• •DROPPED BIEAM / O N ,L 5EE DET A 9 r LINE OF WALL AT ROOF-1°°i1:1'Ei�:OWNIz: I owc (CASED OPENING) AND"SHEET"2A" _ ; 10' CEILING " r _ I ; 2X6 i KITCHEN TRAN50M WINDOWS ABOVE, 5EE $HT 1 _; y" 5EE DETAIL �, _ I;: ' , „ ❑ N 9' CEILING III; I = I 3-2x8 HEADER, FULL LENGTH In ln•,I II.: A/10 AND 1 4020 AWN I WOOD - :; wooD;:. _ 4-4 15X15 SOAP In I :::::::::: ::::::::: I 1 N III SHEET 1 t NICHE, TOP -' Walk - I n - C l o : - - - - - HANGING ROD r :::::: FLUSH BEAM ABOVE WINDOWS ;; 5TORAGE ' - - - - - - - - - - UPPERS ::::: BEV FRIG FLUSH BEAM BELOW WINDOWS; DET A/10 :5HTH 60 A.F.F. I I rr) CARPET - - - - - - - SINK WASHER DRYER - WINE ;---STONE VENEER I 9 6 -8 l i 2X6 ....... 2X6 CABLE RAILING 5Y5TEM p 1/2" _ _ ................... 3-8 1 2 ....... - / (DRAIN) (VENT) RACK N III 1 FRIG::: FRIE:Z::. -.- -.- -.- -. W/ WOOD CAP Ar 5ruD5 III _ 9 HIGH 9 HIGH A5 PER 1n = 1 11 = x I F N 2-8 CASED OPNG CASED OPNG OWNER 72 DIA. 4 RAISED CEILING co 2-8 I CLO5ET ORGANIZERS A5 PER OWNER 9' CEILING ------ N III N Laundry N POST'--------------- ti.________ o 2X6 2X6 .. I H I H I H I H I 11 I PEN TO -BELOW 2054 C5 i III ; °o TILE , 2 -7 3 -2 _ 12 -3 1 2 4 -2 4 -3 1 2 w r 5H H 2-2X10 8'-10" `n '• I cfl " TIMBER5TRAND STUDS N o z g'_g" 4 -0 18 -1111 . ; .... _ -i _ _� 10. "CEILING ROOF G) _ ;STAIR OPENING 5HTH - I r 11 6'-3 2" 2'-8" O 5'-1 1 2" 1'-511 w p - o �1 11 N 11 3 ® I 24 D COUNTER I ; _ D N WOOD • RI65 VERIFY o 1 _co---------- ----------- ------IFH�------ N �BTAkJf f'':_ 3-0 U = -�� 5EE DrE T A/9 LO = = 72. 0o N z ~ 4,: 2" I -oil 11_711 1 11 FACE OF GAR 5HTRK - I, _ = I °� DBL 2-6 6LA55 °L LU ' TREAP5 TUD ACE: _ O POST O I FRENCH DOORS cA , „ FACE INSTALL BACKING FOR DROP TOP CHORD FLOOR IIII O 5'-7" = ' : 18:0: X CENTER IN ROOM 6 DIA 4 CEILING cs) FUTURE GRAB BAR5 TRU55E5 TO ALLOW FOR ;IIII 2-0/6-8 o BUMP UP, SEE SEC 3 CTR CLG pc IN TOILET ROOM ROLL -IN SHOWER 24. TO• o - BUMP UP O Q p Q AND SHOWER �� I 3-0/8-0 ='-COATS CL:G LINEN CUSTOM CABINIETRY Q �o _ 1 s 20 MIN A5 PER OWNER 9 CEILING u LU m o a i OVERHEAD GAS HEATER ;IIII %-0/6-8 0 C Z � � � N Q X z pc w ;IIII 2-2x10 LU 11 Q FOYER Y E R _ OPEN TO 7 � .................. LU 3 (SIDE VENT) ' 3611W LL' °C cn � ` 36 W v N BEL�W _i w oc l- Q � R5 BOOKS 10 CEILING BOOK5 g WOOD m v woo 0 _ z 60" o OFFICE o �, 0 I N ' - 10' CEILING I'_ - o _ o m w z v - _ 13 .IIII ROOF��TRU55E9 -0/6- =O N WOOD - N N N 1'-1 1 4r' _o 2 8 BATH _ @ 24 O.C. TYP. G p < CEDAR 'RIB" 9 .DROP - - .. STONE VENEER 1 1 ROOF GIRDER _ 5TUD5 SEE AT 1Tu 5 N 2X CEDAR CAP — VERIFY ::STATION - :::I �2-0/6 8 CAI o 1n LINE OF WALL AT ROOF ^ Z „ „ V ;IIII > BEAR THI5 WALL ON DETAIL A/4 11 1 2 g p ROOF TRUSSES ;IIII - I 12X4 5.R. GILL STOOP ROOF O 5TUD5 5HTH @ 24" O.C. TYP. FULL TAPE, SAND I$ PAINT N I ,� CUSTOM D SK - z GARAGE WALLS I$ CEILING -� < DWS: 3 UNITS, ALUM FRAME, S.R. RETURNS: N -� - Iw (VERIFY DIRECTION) ; I BROOM 060FX, HEAD AT 108 5/8" A.F.F. II = _ - _ _ 'n " ONE VENEER a j 3 CAP, R GARAGE R A G E 9IEIE DIE • 9 -2X8 HDR 5EE SEC _ IIII p I$ 5TOR. 2X6 ( /6) o �, �, _ 11 1 - = 19 Q t� < ;IIII I B 6 7 �1 r� '- 7 �I If W b I- 1 1 w 4" REINF. CONCRETE FLOOR 10 CEILING CLO N 1 = �, < 1 o I 10' CEILING "� �' t° `" ¢ N 11�� SLOPE TOWARD O.H. DOORS _ M U D R M N OVER RUBBER MEMBRANE OVER MUD R M �, ............. Lb 5EE EXTERIOR FOR N Q IIII PRECAST PLANKS, ALL DETAILS - s - s ,- U WINDOW NOTES ;IIII N "' ± 2 0 oc BY MANUFACTURER. N o = LU N 0 AT 9HTH ± 2'-0" 8'-011 0 1 I R-19 FIBERGLASS INSULATION IN CUBBIES ' ~ W VERIFY PLACEMENT LL � _ DOWNSPOUT w _ OL II II - OF STONE VENEER 50 AT 9HTH 5HTH ~ 2x6 GARAGE EXTERIOR WALLS, Hi ST CCO SILLS CEDAR IBS 1� THAT THE STONE 19 N VERIFY PLACEMENT 0 (I - HE Q SIE DET B 6 5EE SEC 5 6 = 1/4 OVER TWOW FRAME O OF STONE VENEER 90 1 0 (J _ IIII (R-20 IN GARAGE COMMON WALL) / / (9 0 (SAME OTHER SIDE W/ Q[ THAT THE STONE 15 3 1 2" ' REGARD TO THE STUCCO) 1/4' OVER THE WOW FRAME LO ' II11 (SAME OTHER SIDE) 0 x _ W/4 MIL POLY V.B. -' o 4026 2W FX " " 11 1 11 11 1 11 I 11 1 11 I 11 ,(� 0 � - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ; I INSULATE ENTIRE ATTIC W/ SPRAY FOAM 1 3 4 24 =' 1 4 3 -5 3 -7 5 -6 3 -6 3 -6 1_011 6 -0 'n I I FACING FRONT „ „ „ o I I ;IIII 2026 FX AT 51DE 6 -0 SHr,H 12 -6 SHTH 7 -0 12 -0 5HTH FLUSH HIEADIERS 17" 10'-0" 1711 5HTH 17'-711 1711 ~ I I ;IIII r------------------ - - - - -- - MOUNT WINDOWS �0 AT CEILING -�Q -- -- -- -- -- COVERED CONC, FRONT— STOOP -- I I I I (5.R. RETURNS) cS -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- a �IIII I I -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- I I IIII I I I I O s DOWNSPOUT FLUSH BEAM FLUSH BEAM STOOP EDGE 3 TRAP WINDOWS OVERHEAD I I rEDGE OF LOW SLOPE ROOF (5EE ROOF PLAN) ; I 9-0 X 8-0 O.H. DR. I IIII I SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATION W/ HEADER I ;IIII I I 13'-8" 5HTH TO STOOP 33'-0" -- -- -- -- POST I I STOOP 18-0 X 8-0 O.H. DR. -------------- = TYPICAL STOOP COLUMN: o = 12 0 = I W/ HEADER I 17" SQUARE DIM. AT SHEATHING _I 0 7 I ~ -- FRAMED WITH STUDS, FINISHED WITH STONE VENEER �p EXT.SHEATHING TO FLUSH BEAM 11 1 2" 7'-111 1'-1111 _I FACE OF IN51DE STUD AT STUDS AT STUDS AT STUDS 7'-011 7'-011 31611 18'-011 31 11 14'-011 25'-011 N N 5HTH 5HTH M A I N L E V E L f L 9 9 K P L A n _ STONE CUSTOM ALUM FRAME WITH VENEER 0 SCALE ; 1 4 II = 1 1 - 0 II C N ELEVATIONS, W/ SIDELITES. 2 6 9 0 5 1 I 1 CREATE THAT15 THE HE FIIN15HDDH 0 5TONE VENEER EXTENDS _ _1 OVER THE FRAME, BOTH W DOOR5 TH15 LEVEL TO BE 8-0 HIGH. R.O.H. = 9911 10 INSIDE AND OUT, BY ALL WINDOWS TOPS TO BE 1411 DOWN FROM CEILING 1/4" 50 5 CAULK ALL JOINTS (ALSO 5EE EXTERIOR VIEW) UNLE55 OTHERWISE NOTED. DETAIL A4 2'-0" 5CALE; 1/2" = 1'-011 2'-011 I v� �Ln Ln �— Z ` E vU � U V ao 0 lu Z .� C 1U i �O Q ,.J o �w O Lj L %0 V 0 M 00 C) C 01 t M CL ,\``c`Oav';;''. 414, W '� � C7 W ♦ O m _ru_ W ~ •+- Ll lu L III nnJ L O Q � O J U_ V C 1 t _. L � Z Q) •� Z m W O 11-- N O\ z z^ y \ � ao W W W J LJ � %� gn E.,L4mhitectumICADDILDK13545 Ivy Place, Or , F/ynnFerry (Bet/, & Mark)IFenyFtynn-VP15.gxd -- 0111312025 -- 04:55 PM -- Scale 1 : 48 2X6 PARAPET WRAP RUDDER MEMDRANE AROUND PARAPET 5/4x10 L 2X8 OLOCKING- DOTT LOWE TRI 1/4M FINIS y DETAIL co w X6 PARAPET COLORCLAD TYPE COPING FASTEN A5 PER MANUF.5PEC5 RUDDER MEMBRANE ROOF OVER TAPERED RIGID IN5ULATION (5LOPE TOWARD5 5UPPER5) ON ROOF 5HEATHING ON ROOF TRU55E5 RUDDER MEMBRANE RUDDER MEMDRANE ROOF OVER-\ TAPERED RIGID IN5ULATION (5LOPE TOWARDS 5UPPER5) ON ROOF 5HEATHING ON ROOF TRU55E5 T 5 0 U5H REAM SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" STRUCTURAL NOTES: ALL ROOF TRUSSES, ROOF TRUSS GIRDERS, FLOOR TRUSSES, BEAMS, HEADERS, TALL- WALLS, BRACE WALLS, FOUNDATIONS AS NEEDED, FOOTINGS TO BE DESIGNED BY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER, NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THE PLANS AS SHOWN, FLOOR TRUSS DESIGNER TO ACCOUNT FOR DUCTWORK AND PLUMBING REQUIREMENTS AS DETERMINED BY THE MECH. SUBS. CAU 5LOPE 1/4" PER CAULK 5LOPE 1/4" PER 12" //// 1 1� ilin" 1/4 ROUN AT INTER EXTEND MIN 3/4' FOR WINDOW WRAP RUBBER MEMBRANE AROUND PARAPET BLOCKING A5 NEE 5TUCCO FINISH A5 PER CODE! OVER DRAINAGE HOU5E WRAP OVER WALL 5HEATHING CEDAR "RI135": 1X 5MOOTH HEARTWOOD CEDAR, MITRE CORNER5, ON INNER BLOCKING 5UPPORT A5 NEEDED. FA5TEN TO 5TUD WALL WITH HIDDEN FASTENERS LOWE5T LP TRIM TO DE 5oG/\Lt: 1/4 = 1 -U COLORCLAD TYPE COPING FA5TEN A5 PER MANUF. 5PEC5 RUDDER MEMBRANE ROOF OVER 1 TAPERED RIGID IN5ULATION (5LOPE TOWARD5 5UPPER5) ON ROOF 5HEATHING ON ROOF TRU55E5 DETAIL C5 METAL RIDGE CI GA5KETED FA5TENER 5A DOL LAYER ICE/WATER SHIELD OVER ROOF 5HEATHING ON MANUF ROOF TRU55E5 OT A5KETED FA5TENER /4x10 LP X8 DLOCKING V_---10 BLOCKING4x10 LP j 5HEATHING 4/4x10 LP DETAIL A5 SCALE: 2" = 1'-0" D LAYER 5 A5 BOTTOM OF LOWE5T LP TRIM TO DE 1/4" DEYOND FINISHED SOFFIT 5HEATHING 1X CEDAR T$G HONEY STAINED vLn � Lo Z ` E v° � U >` �E V UO L. � H 0 Lj Z .� c 9E lu i �O QLn O Lj 0 M oc � t M � ,\`` `OLu T'A'av';;''. =� C7 W C m ru n11111W LL 44 Lu V m a J � a Lj Lu L in 0 uj 0 CC � a J Z uj M L Z O V � C V Lu y .. L N O 3 = � z m W O I-- N 0 \ Z Z y \ �_ ao LuW J uJ _ < ,- U< Ito,) croom E.,L4mhitectum1CADDILDK13545 Ivy Place, Or , F"nFerry (Beth & Mark)IFenyF"n VP15.gxd -- 0111312025 -- 04:55 PM -- Scale 1 : 48 to 0 E.,L4mhitectumICADDILDK13545 Ivy Place, Or , F"nFerry (Beth & Mark)IFenyFtynn-VP15.gxd -- 0111312025 -- 04:55 PM -- Scale 1 : 48 v� �LO LO �- z ,E v° � U V ao C� ao s o Li Z .� 0 lu > Q ,1"i o c� Li &� v 0 M � o � o� L M CL lu L 1 co • • 1 L W) C .vw' LL _ I Z O V � C V W y .. L N O 3 = � z m W O I-- N 0 \ Z Z y \ � ao LU LU W J HJ � %� gn 3011 . . ' . ' . . ' . ' -I THESE DIMENSIONS ARE TO " , . " . " . " . " , . THE TOP OUTER FASCIA BOARD 2:5/.12 5EE SECTIONS FOR EXACT ROOF TRU55 DIMENSIONS . .I ..........,. ............... ,........... --1 I 24" 305CUPPER - - - L --r-- DOWNSPOUT o= T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . , . . . . . . . . . . - .SADDLE. I . - - - - - - - J "I .I . . . . . . . . . . . . . --!5CUPPER s . . . . . . . . . . . DOWNSPOUT ; 60�� : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I .I LOW SLOPE ROOF I I .I ............ 1 ' .5CUPPER" I .• I•• ' . .......LOW SLOPE ROOF �':'.�, . . ,..... . . I. I I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FALSE WALLS "36,1 ON ROOF . .'.'.".'.".'.".'.'.".'.".'.".'.' PROVIDF1'• of OPENINGS , . IN WALL I F,OR ROOF DRAINAGE ' I ' I • L _ J L _ I Ir'--- ------J ~ ..;_ .c=� _ LOW SLOPE ROOF- lu - - - .I _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ------ SCUPPER .. DOWNSPOUT u - -.-.- - - - - - - - 5CUPPER - . . . . .. 3F DOWNSPOUT o------------ --------------- ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0-1 SCUPPE DOWNSF v� LMJLn i— cZ � L ` E v°_ � U V ao C� 00 L. L. 0 cd LjZ•� c 9E lu i �O Q ,.J o c� ' ._ � & 4 � Lj V 0 M 00 O c m t M CL 'o so lu L Z Z Z Q MJ LPL �. O O L Q .vw' LL _ I Z O V � C V W y .. W L N O 3 = � z m W O I— N 0 __.1 Z Z to\ � ao Lu Lu YI J uJ 2 <'_ U < Vol") gnom E:L4mhitectum1CADDILDK13545 Ivy Place, 0r , F"nFerry (Beth & Mark)IFenyF"n VP15.gxd -- 0111312025 -- 04:55 PM -- Scale 1 : 48 X6 PARAPET COLORCLAD TYPE COPIN FASTEN A5 PER MANUF. RUBBER MEMBRANE ROOF OVER TAPERED RIGID IN5ULATION (51-OPE TOWARD5 5UPPER5) ON ROOF 5HEATHING ON ROOF TRU55E5 A 8 DETAIL SCALE; 1" = 1'-0" v51MILAR TO 13/8 DETAIL WRAP RUBBER MEMBRANE AROUND PARAPET BLOCKING A5 NEEDED >ETAIL 5LOPED CONCRETE FLOOR OVER RUBBER MEMBRANE OVER PRECA5T PLANK5 A5 PER MANUF. .................................................................... II -----------------------------------------------------------L.ED-GE --I--- ER MEMBRANE B/8 DETAIL 5CALE; 1" = 1'-0" N 3 1/211 v� �Ln �— Z ` E v° � U V ao C� 00 S L. � H 0 cd Li Z •� 7 c 9E lu % Q C ._ 1� Li & %o 0 M oc o� L M CL tr ru _ OC W 5 f lu L L LL _ I z O V � C V W y .. L N O 3 = � z m W O I-- N 0 \ Z Z y \ � ao Lu Lu Y1 J uJ 2 < �- E.,L4mhitectumlCADDILDK13545 Ivy Place, Or , F"nFerry (Beth & Mark)IFenyFtynn-VP15.gxd -- 0111312025 -- 04:55 PM -- Scale 1: 48 III t-5TUCCO FIN15H _____________ 5CALE: 1/4" = 1'—O" B 9 DETAIL 5CALE: 11I = 11-011 WOOD BURNING FIREPLACE FLUE 5TUCC RUBBER MEMBRANE OVER ROOF 5HEATHIN6 OVER 2X8 JOISTS TYPICAL 2X6 PARAPET 2X6 PARAPET COLORCLAD TYPE COPING A5 PER MANUF. 5PEC5 FA5TEN CAB MADE SMOOTH ' TOM INED AR "RIBS i WIDE, BHT VARIE5 RUBBER MEMBRANE ROOF OVER WRAP RUBBER MEMBRANE TAPERED RIGID IN5ULATION AROUND PARAPET (SLOPE TOWARD5 5UPPER5) ON ROOF 5HEATHING ON ROOF TRU55E5 - - co N 2X8 BLOCKING 5/4 X 10 if _ 4/4 X 10 D E T A I L co 1X8 BLOCKING 3'-0" AT TRU55 4/4 X 10 5HEATHING 1X T$G CEDAR SOFFIT BOTTOM OF ON 5HEATHING LOWEST LP 3'-0" AT 5HTH TRIM TO BE 1/4" BEYOND �o FINI5HED SOFFIT 512" 5TUD5 N 1X 5MOOTH CEDAR HEARTWOOD "RIB5" BY CABINET MAKER. 5ECURE TO MAIN 5TUD WALL WITH HIDDEN FASTENERS 4" CAULK ALL EXTERIOR EDGES IN CONTACT FIN FROM WITH HOUSE 5HTH 5LOPE 1/4" PER 12" N Z Z LL LL 13 1/411 FIN FROM 5HTH ALUM FRAME FIXED GLA55 •METAL FLA5HING BEHIND RIB5 TYPICAL AT EXTERIOR TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL: 5TUCCO FIN15H OR LP LAP 51DING, 8" EXPO5URE (5EE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS) OVER HOU5E WRAP, OVER 1/2" WALL 5HEATHING ON 2X6 5TUD5, W/ R-19 BATT5 (UNLE55 NOTED) `� W/ 4 MIL POLY, 1/2" 5HEATHING W/ 2X8 SILL PLATE (WHERE HOLD -IN) AND 1/2" ANCHOR BOLT5 1X CEDAR WALL CAP, 5TAIN TO MATCH 2" CERTIFOAM OR EQUAL RIGID IN5ULATION (A5 HOLD -IN) ON 8" THICK POURED CONCRETE WALL, A5 PER CODE5 AND ENGINEERING, OVER WATERPROOFING MASTIC W/ INTERIOR FURRING AT FINISHED 5PACE5 9 WALL LE; 1" = 1'-0° X20XCONT.CONCRETE ERIMETER FOOTING5 EE ENGINEERING FOR DDITIONAL NOTE5 SECTION 4" PERFORATED FOOTING DRAIN PIPE EMBEDDED IN WA5HED GRAVEL AND WRAPPED WITH FILTER FABRIC AND LOCATED BELOW THE FLOOR SLAB LEVEL, PIPE TO 5UMP BA5KET, 5UMP BA5KET TO HAVE AIR -TIGHT CHILD -PROOF COVER E.,L4mhitectumlCADDILDK13545 Ivy Place, Or , F"nFerry (Beth & Mark)IFenyF"n VP15.gxd -- 0111312025 -- 04:56 PM -- Scale 1 : 48 II II WALL SHEATHIN 2 LAYER5 GRADE "I-) II BUILDING PAPER MORTAR SCRATCH COAT I AND BROWN COATS II GALVANIZED STEEL LAT II MORTAR SETTING BED II 5TUCC II I J MOLD I PROVIDE GAP DURING 5TUCC II INSTALLATION - FILL GAP W/ it ROPE AND CAULK TAKING II CARE NOT TO STAIN THE STUCCO I II II I LAP 51DING A5 PER PLANS I WRB - WATER RE515TANT II BARRIER II EXT. WALL 5HEATHING Ol II II - — — — — — — — — — — — — — WRAP 1 LAYER BUILDING PAPER 8" AROUND CORNER LAP 5 CIN6, STUCCO W51Dt CORNER SCALE Y= 1'-O" SHEATHING 3UILDING PAPER ATH >VERLAP 15 SHOWN ON IETAIL 13C007 ')GERED NAILING ERN AT CORNERS OUTSIDE CORNER, WOOD 5TUD5 NAILING PATTERN SCALE Y= 1I-0I I ALL 5HEATHING LAYER5 GRADE "D" JILDING PAPER ORTAR 5CRATCH COAT BROWN COATS ALVANIZED 5TEEL LATH ORTAR 5ETTING BED TUCCO FIN15H \P LATH AROUND CORNER FRAMING - 16�� MINIMUM OUTSIDE CORNER, WOOD 5TUED5 SCALE Y= 1'-O" TUCCO PPROVED DRAINAGE PLANE _ATH 5Y5TEM LAYERS GRADE "E)" UILDING PAPER AP 51LL FLASHING, OVER INDOW FLANGE $ A5 PER INDOW MANUFACTURER ALL SHEATHING HULK UNDER WINDOW FLANGE PTIONAL -MOLD WITH 3/811 WEEPS @ 3" O.C. 5M DRIP CAP INDOW FRAME PROFILES VARY =FER TO MFR'S DETAILS FOR INSTALLATION AND FLASHING STUCCO AT WINDOW HEAD 5CALE 31I= 11-011 INDOW FRAME PROFILES VARY =FER TO MFR'S DETAIL5 FOR STALLATION AND FLASHING )PE $ CAULK GAP MOLD SULK UNDER WINDOW FLANGE ALL 5HEATHING LAYER5 GRADE 111) UILDING PAPER AF 51LL FLASHING, UNDER INDOW FLANGE. LAP OVER UILDING PAPER, 5EE WDW. MANUF PECS FOR ADDITIONAL DETAIL5 PPROVED DRAINAGE PLAN LATH MAT 5Y5TEM TUCCO STUCCO AT WINDOW 51LL SCALE Y= 1'-0" WITH J MOLD AND CAULK AT 51LL STUCCO HOUSE WRAP, GOES BEHIND LEDGE 25/32" O.S.B. WALL 5HEATHING 2 LAYER5 "D" BUILDING PAPER• J-MOLD WITH 3/8" WEEP5 @ 3" O.C. SELF ADHESIVE FLASHING (5AF)— OVER GALV. FLASHING GALVANIZED 5TEEL FLASHING, BEND - DOWN BETWEEN LEDGER AND J015T5 NOTCH J015T5 TO RECEIVE FLASHING SELF ADHESIVE FLASHING (5AF)--- BEHIND LEDGER AND 51DING ABOVE AND BELOW LEDGER. BELOW LEDGER LAP OVER GALV FLASHING X 3 1/2" GALVANIZED LAG SCREWS, 11O.C., STAGGERED PATTERN OR A5 PER IRC R502.2.2.1 DTT2Z HAN6ER""*' II 2X10 TREATED DECK LEDGER"" 3 THICK COMP051TE LEDGER BACKER FLASHI� STUCCO FINISH 2 LAYER5 "D" BUILDING PAPEF 1'-7 3/4" 5TUD5 N 0 �z n IS) 5TUD5 1/2" SHEETROCK 11 1 4 1/2" SHEATHTING 2X12— 1/2" 5HEATHTING- 1/2" SHEETROCK 1_711 STUCCO FINISH -1 4 1/2" FROM HOUSE SHTH RECE55ED 3030 FX ALUM FRAME WINDOW CAULK JOINT FLASHING OVER STUCCO CAULK JOINT FLASHING UNDER STUCCO STUCCO FIN15H 1/2" 5HEATHING WRAPS ALL 51DE5 OF CUT 2X12 RIBS @ 16" O.C. TO CREATE BOX BEAM BETWEEN WINDOWS STUCCO FINISH ESTOP THIS 2ND LAYER OF 5HEATHING AT END OF WINDOW FRAME CAULK JOINT STUCCO FIN15H �WOOD CAP TO BWO D STORAGE _ I I I 1 II 1 +-2-2x10 B/10 DECK LEDGER 5CALE: 2" = 1'-0" 0 11 1 4" o EXT. 5HEATHING WOOD STORAG TO WDW CENTER � N A/10 DETAIL SCALE: 1" = 1'-O" STUCCO FIN15H vLn � `n Z E v°_ � U V ao cd UO S r_ 0 Li Z .� 7 lu i �O Q ,. o Li�0 0 M 00 O c 0' s M � ,\``` `OT'A'ov'''. lu L z: J MJ W Z O O � a W z C D 0 LL y J L a —v H z m W O IH N 0 \ Z Z y \ � ao W W W J10HJ E:L4mhitectum1CADDILOK13545 Ivy Place, Or , F"nFerry (Beth & Mark)IFenyF"n VP15.gxd -- 0111312025 -- 04:56 PM -- Scale 1: 48 CT1 FLOOR SCALE: 3/16" = V-0" NOTE: VERIFY PREWIRING FOR AUTOMATED BLINDS VERIFY OUTLETS FOR - HOLIDAY LIGHT5 L oT f CAL S`r50L5 INCANDE5CENT LED/CFL SCONCE O3 3 BULB FLUSH MOUNT PENDANT/CHANDELIER 20 2 BULB FLU5H MOUNT CAN, FLAT CEILING FAN O CAN, ANGLED ® UNDER CABINET OO 2 LIGHT BAT ® EXT WALL LIGHT 000 3 LIGHT BAR O EYEBALL 2x4 FLUORE5CENT ®n PORCELAIN 5OCKET YY SPOT LIGHT5 1x4 FLUORE5CENT BILLIARD5 LIGHT 5F O DECK P05T LIGHT5 (OPTIONAL) -------------------------------\ 1..........:AT- a: \ /{ 7'1 -------------------------- \� OUTLET IN ONE DRAWER F:- I-----------------4. -- ------ OPTIONAL DECK POST LI6HT5 \ BACK WALL OUTLET5 TO BE LOCATED ON THE UNDER5IDES I OF THE UPPER CABINET (NOT IN THE BACK51FLA51-1) I Q:i o I ` ----------------------- I I l.--:::A-: =ig r------ - - - - - - I I , I I I I I I I I / I I / I I I I I I I I I I / I I / ---------------- - - - - - - / VERIFY OUTLETS FOR��- __ ----- ---® �, HOLIDAY LIGHT5 \ \-------------------------------------- -•• / -------- -- - -- --1--------------------------------- shh--- -- , ------------ .--->------------------------ -------------------------- ----- 2 LIGHTED ; ------------ WINE RACK5 _\ _ ------------- ---------- \ \+/ \ ,Sn , I ' II \ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- VERIFY OUTLETS FOR MA F L ooHOLIDAY LIGHT5 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-011 E.,L4mhitectumlCADDILDK13545 Ivy Place, Or , F/ynnFerry (Beth & Mark)IFenyFtynn-VP15.gxd -- 0111312025 -- 04:56 PM -- Scale 1 : 48 0�= PROPOSED NEW HOUSE LOCATION EXHIBIT --for-- NORTON HOMES --of-- 3545 IVY PLACE ORONO, MN 55391 EXISTING PARCEL DESCRIPTION (PER HENNEPIN COUNTY CERTIFICATE OF TITLE NO. 1364929) In the following described land situated in the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota: Lot 1, Block 1, Casco Cove Subject to utility easement as shown on plat; Subject to drainage and utility easements as shown on plat; Subject to drainage and utility easements as contained in the dedication clause and shown on the plat of Ivy Estates; Subject to mineral and mineral rights reserved by the State of Minnesota; (Now as to part of above land) Subject to building restrictions contained in deed Doc. No. 478968 as referred to in deed Doc No. 524728, (Now as to part of above land) EASEMENT NOTES. - The utility easement shown on the recorded plat of CASCO COVE (Recorded in 1988.) is the same as the Utility and Access Easement per Document No. 1630932 (Recorded in 1985). The plat does not identify the utility easement as Document No. 1630932. Utility Easements per Document Nos. T87696912 and T876942 (Recorded in 1967). were not depicted on the recorded plat of CASCO COVE. All three easements descriptions are based on the underlying Plat and Registered Land Survey and were computed accordingly. NOTES - Bearings shown are on Hennepin County Coordinate System. - See Existing Conditions Survey dated 01-22-2025 and Certificate of Survey prepared by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. dated 01-27-2025 for additional information. AERIAL EXHIBIT SCALE: 1 INCH = 60 FEET T ER PER II \ I K\ X II I I I \ III / I ANN i z / r MN 55391 931.62 931.79 FNDIPl/2 'O 0 �FNDMON ) n ��a l� e�� /"�ti°� \0r ��0 X v 931.81 929.2 \ MHSAN 0� /hJQ' Q���1 H m / EWATER S l�J • /�o� �\,1 �QPC\� n i r - '\� Q\ m C m 11929.4 �a ���OQ �C\ J_A� I T t ` m O I � C I \ l ♦ / / VIV III a rI �\O'` .'r\C`\�Q IMo EWATER I OR Y (n I r I x932.6 !(r'o 10 O EWATEf\ I 1 CENTERLINE 20 FOOT WIDE ,I UTILITY EASEMENT PER /h9TER\� I AREA TO \� / •'�• afABs\ ' -AVERAGE LAKE DOCUMENT NO. 876912 - -- _ j 929' n, REMAIN �8 \ SHORE SETBACK LINE <`r ^l / l -�j I 934.09 .j0 / ' I "Y�, . 933.31 I 1�1HSAN \ / EWATER (r I I I �� \ i 9,,, S INV.74 I II I O \ 'y� s A Rv?1 " eY' I n I I I \\ � �s� p 1 / 9 0 '-.2 .4 �I I G \ / a 110 I I 110 O F /937.94 938.31 9, A 1p I V \ � 9�s2 r FNDJLM FNDIP1/2 I DOCK I 0 o 929., F- EWA R I n �I PAVERS TO O I'I O REMAIN --- o ; 3 III I Ov IM I A r• / ��' / 10l n (9 C� W \\ 10 o - Z \ w ,-r \Ln W QLUJ \ \I �� �\ I I Z\ ROCK \\ \ "944.24 ^ r �^ d Q Q EWATER II 1 WATERFALLS TO oos \ FNDJLM = I z I I I O \ BE REMOVED ---. °\ ���Sf t� 00 aLu N Z SURVEY LINE P ' ll 11 \ 441 W --- III n 1 ' I X L�� ' ) os / o_ 0 W o Z j/05, N wOW� II I I I j \\ \ �t� R0, / ^/ I I ' I oo \ �� vP 948.41 O) W N w � I I n I WOOD STEPS _- / -ROCK MHSAN WATER so\ '\� S \ / / '(D LQ T� z n/ 11 I TO REMAIN •� �7 \ m a FALLS OQ ^ Q 929.1 ' W O H J J Z EWATER VQom 2 N W I ' ^' O .� / ��� W � w p i �I w °A I !; r,�� 1�p� o AV � c� /O u 3 o I r J O O (n ~ ��� 7T� II M N I� OST�<</i sO \ ' \ rL 0 / �I 1 p.S "rviii I "1 � II I OLD PROPO ED 4x4 \ \ 2�� \ / NII z O EXISTING 2 r Qy I I I Con I SHED HOUSE LOCATION CONCRE CENTERLINE OF 20 FOOT I III �+ II I PAD WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT PER 'I I 18,4 (YELLOW AR DOCUMENT NO. 1630932 r I I o� - SHED TO \ rr ♦ 10 AND PLAT OF CASCO COVE - - - - - �I I -- 2.61-----____ly s.4% REMAIN i Q1.y. ` O 0\ o IIII -I _ Irl II -75726.0 omi\ �'6�Q� i\ \a,�d��F�\\s\\j\� `VQG�'� ��5Q.� ��\,O/Vi •S yy� \ ' ati APPROXIMATE SEWER SERVICE FNDIP3/4 UP.50 956.4 9291 -- 4o � ADJUST WATER VALVE 'SCREE O HEIGHT AS NEEDED PORCH <sPROPOSEDLOCATION PER CITY PLANS --j --- -- Q o �II I� �I m �o ti HOUSE vv 4�4 y3�o `vv I ^ I 1r 60 v O \ - ROCK CONSTRUCTION THE SLOPE FROM THE OHWL OR z Ilo I \ MAIN LOW /� O 61 •'dam J `ate 1 - ENTRANCE PER CITY TOE TO A POINT 25 FEET ABOVE N II' ' + I o FLOOR = 946.9 \ v� Q dl v3 O , r STANDARDS I OHWL IS LESS THAN 30%AND J'n I nn I RETAINING WALL h \ GOpO / .� 1 O� �'6�\� w ni III I > 10 \\ v S 3 'L6 O 3 's Q _f v� y I TO REMAIN 'y--------------- F 3 � � O 'S .P ,o 0 THEREFOR NOT A BLUFF. PLEASE O cr v' ? I - •5 \ Q y0 Q� 3 6' C9 G f Q O SEE EXISTING CONDITIONS = z 11 i j G \ SURVEY DATED 6-18-24 FOR O 77.6 0 FURTHER INFORMATION.op p'� j I I n 0 i---------77.3------_____ 8 4 �-'1• y +��� Q`�O \\ ,3 Q S 9 u I r % � Q� Q�� �� V�b� 929.1 1 ��yy •p EwATPo \ 958.38 1 m' S FND-1/2IP ICI I I j ro UPPER GARAGE I'I I 1 n' I �9� o FLOOR=956.5 p oS - 1IO� C �l/ I II m � / tip• 'y 0 I I I ya' O CA5 .0 929.2 / I Q, � \ I ° EWATER 929•0 75 FOOT 929.2 �� I n I OHWL I EWATER.% I SETBACK �sg� ti� A� �� 1 � 929.4 1 1 ' 0 1 � I/ I 10 10 I �V / II 1 ZlA 929.1IIN�.09 EWATER\ \ I ` � I� \ �1GPPp� / \ V/ 29. 2 \\ S o I F\\/ 10 Q � i ` 929.1 FNQr3/4IPzz_t61.5p63.30 928.20 EWATER \ \ ! 945.46 / \ \ \�INV MHSAN / 0 929.21 EWATIER •929.5 EWATERI / a a 4�7 n \ I15 0 955.14929.5 �,\ / FND-1/2IP EWATERII II to I lo` o LLJ 929.4\1v / 1i� / EWATER I_________________________�/ - I O 1 LLJ V / 0 Q----//I '-'---------- ------ 136.0-------------- �_________________ rn I - / ) = Lo ' I ^� ` r 955.05 FND-REBAR12755 1 0 / /929.6 EWATERLU O - - LL LL o II 11 ' i I I III 111 I Y \J /, J929.6 I� Q�O�PA P0 GP 1 aQ' Ne CS 0z Cb,�V r0 961.52 FND-1/2IP i \ i �RqI Fq � Nq F of c MFNT qNo I gsCn po R ' kyz � j/Y VF F p�T / / / / / / / NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10 20 40 1 INCH = 20 FEET BENCHMARK MNDNR BENCHMARK- BRASS DISK SURVEY MONUMENT IN GROUND, 15 FEET WEST OF SWAL RIPRAP, 25 FEET NORTH OF CONCRETE CURB AT EXIT OF GRAYS BAY DAM AREA. ELEVATION = 932.7 FEET (NGVD29). LEGEND • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED 1 DENOTES FOUND PKNAIL OR SPIKE 0 DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS# 25343 (TO BE SET) O DENOTES FOUND JUDICIAL LANDMARK ocs DENOTES CURB STOP - DENOTES ELECTRICAL BOX X 952.36 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES GAS METER DENOTES GUY WIRE `ob DENOTES POWER POLE sO DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DENOTES RETAINING WALL OHU DENOTES OVERHEAD UTILITY > DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN DENOTES UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOCUMENT NO. 876942 - - - - - - - DENOTES UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOCUMENT NO. 876912 DENOTES UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOCUMENT NO. 1630932 AND PER THE PLAT OF CASCO COVE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE L_ - J DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE r7-7T DENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE DENOTES PAVER SURFACE DENOTES PROPOSED RETAINING WALL ® DENOTES WOOD HUB/METAL SPIKE AT 11 FOOT OFFSET (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) AT THIS TIME ONLY THE TREES WITHIN THE POTENTIAL AREA FOR NEW HOME CONSTRUCTION WERE LOCATED. THE TREES WITHIN THE 75 FOOT OHWL SETBACK WILL NEED TO BE LOCATED AT A LATER DATE. I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. J ES E. NAPIER Date: 01-27-25 License No. 25343 DRAWN BY: JEN JOB NO: 240376HS DATE: 01/16/25 CHECK BY: JEN FIELD CREW: JH-JR-CB 1 01/27/25 REVISED PER CITY COMMENTS JEN 2 3 NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY EST.'S" Professional Land Surveyors www.egrud.com 6776 Lake Drive N E, Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 361-8701 S:\RUD\CAD\24PROJ\240376HS\240376HS.DWG 240376H% 196 From: DEBI DIBIAS To: Melanie Curtis Subject: Re: LA25-000004 / 3545 Ivy PI - plans Date: Wednesday, February 12, 2025 11:41:01 AM Melanie, Comments are that we look forward to having them as neighbors; the home is beautiful! For the builder, we just ask that they, subcontractors, etc all respect the narrowness of Ivy Place for parking. In addition to the road being quite narrow, it is on a drastic incline making departures difficult when icy. Thank you. Debi Sent from my iPhone On Feb 11, 2025, at 11:11 AM, Melanie Curtis <MCurtis@oronomn.gov> wrote: Please see the attached survey and architectural plans. Reach out with questions. Comments submitted to me before noon on Thursday (2/13) will be included in the planning commission's public packet. <image001.jpg> Melanie Curtis, Planner 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Website: www.oronomn.gov Email: mcurtis@oronomn.gov Direct 952.249.4627 Planning & Zoning Department 952.249.4620 <Permit Set red.pdf> <Certif'icate of Survey.pdf> 197 D� A Alt A 169 u PAP' 198 Or 110- k t Za ,4b ik a a: 1' 64 Aza „ her ,•, r 1A. Ow C. L. t 4.3 1. IS :. 4 � Vertical < Fri May 3 2024 199 It WIM lkr,4 T ly io 616W �L Obliqueque < Tue Apr 25 2023 200 IF AW gr x1f - Ole Ai IF -10 OL A air A ,Illy, Iw LM 1 Oblique < Tue Apr 25 2023 > AM 201 - w i i_ i "R � _ \.,'T� - !i•- a. '� ���` `.� •��f ! '.''} �C •.1 f- w"�, �'+n: �`•.fie v '�•:.� _ . S't4No- y r Ac '�+., .�.�f / \I Wit• ,� ��� � '� It t��y,e � .�M� _ ,,ice`• - `�� ,� i � _ •��y.- 1 JI.... J' r' •ter- ��� x f L Oblique < Tue Apr 25 2023 > 'T r• 1. ,�. rr % ' r .: ��y'�' p�A ;•: S�.W � T�ir��` t,17.�1..}r ti � a �. ]r�H �-� ���r R"�� j �J Etsd �i' • ��� '•� • 1 r' "' _ - r . O r s'. ! �• i e+ F .fir• •^� , r. - If i. } S i �'■. �^! . � n;i. tS.: I• I.p'',f � r•S. f . n , t$� • 'ram - e.rrr•j' •�•� IF¢� ?y 'V, - �: r vL y v If 27 Sit -12 — �ti \� ,•''. } . ^may, t4. j� - � ���� �. 00 Oblique < Fri May 3 2024 C Y •'i 203 ' � � � �� •• , r�� � � � � ' T .ter" ~ ; , �x� § • � � ' ri. - r..�. �r. n ■ .fir _ '6. 1_ - .. g 'f •Lti ,s �V ,T_ •ice esyi `,., "� ' ..Y . • * •Al:,ir�+ 'Y w' 1. '' �, -'_ —�� + � �f.r. a ti. a �. k + '; } ., _ •', 01 Jp Twill x ` � �., :! -• _ si,. ..tip '� � - . �" � 1 �� ��•' vF .�f#w r ry.�4..�.i '-�Tr•k�� � +� _ 1 - �`�``h l � _ x' ', y:Y • -� y AW � � J fir' � �` �*• � , rim ftzi ' "Tc r .. A.,.'.21. :+. Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 18, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 10:09 p.m. Commissioners said it is a good solution to a water problem for a small encroachment in the setback and would not be able to be viewed by neighbors. Several were concerned the porticstoop would not be enough to solve the water problem, and that a practical difficulty was not suffic' stablished. McCutcheon moved, Jarnot seconded, to approve LA25-000003, 155 as applied. VOTE: Ayes: 5, Nays 2 (Ressler and Kirchner). 6.9 LA25-000004, NORTON HOMES O/B/O MARK FERRY, 3545 IVYPLACE, AVERAGE LAKESE The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staf approve the request for a variance for small changes to the applicant is working with a new builder. Staff said there are The Planning Commission discussed the ite I d qu( Norton Homes, Inver Grove Heights, represe e Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 10:21 There were no public comment Chair Bollis closed the Commissioners said th plan last year. Ressler m Lakesh ack 6.10 1�000005, :21 p E 0 North, Variances, esentatio1w discuss and approved last year. The is to the buildable area. and the applicant, Pat Hiller of were minor and they had already reviewed the d, to approve LA24-000004, 3545 Ivy Place, Average ; Ayes: 7, Nays 0. ERS INC, 1480 BOHNS POINT ROAD, VARIANCES The Planni missi equested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and consider the Vste erage lakeshore setback variance that would add 3.5 feet of defined height to an accessory property to match the existing house but reduce the size of the footprint and hardcover. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff and the applicants, Jack Schwarz and Kurt Schwarz,Schwarz Builders Inc. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 10:42 p.m. There were no public comments. Page 6 of 8 205 AGENDA ITEM Date: March 10, 2025 Title: Utility Rate Study Proposal Presenter: Maggie Jin, Finance Director Section: Finance Report Item: 20 Purpose: The purpose of this council item is to seek approval from Council to move forward with the proposed Utility Rate Study by Abdo. 2. Background: The City's enterprise operations are funded primarily by user fees and are operated as separate, stand-alone functions. In order to ensure utility rates, specifically water, sewer and stormwater, are adequately being charged to users within the City of Orono while maintaining current and future operating and capital needs and reserves, staff is recommending an external utility rate study be performed. The last external utility rate study was performed in 2009 by Ehlers and Associates. Internal studies completed by staff were performed in 2013 and in 2019. A new rate study will analyze the pricing structure to ensure current costs are reflected accurately and future needs are met. Scope: The proposed utility rate study will include the following key components: • Analysis of current rates and run scenarios to determine if other models or tier levels should be considered; • Evaluate the operational and infrastructure expenditures and assess revenue requirement to ensure adequate revenue is generated to cover both operational expenses and long-term infrastructure investments; • Review and discuss outcomes with city management and City council. 4. Options: While City staff possesses strong knowledge of the City's utilities and operations, partnering with an experienced external vendor has its key advantages. A consulting firm has expertise and specialized knowledge of current best practices, industry trends and regulatory changes to ensure an unbiased and an up-to-date analysis. Abdo has done numerous utility rate studies in other cities, with recent studies in Maple Plain, Belle Plaine, and Cologne, MN. An external vendor provides an impartial viewpoint, which can lend credibility to the findings and recommendations. Abdo has the resources and tools to conduct complex studies more quickly and efficiently and has advance modeling software that would be time consuming for internal staff to develop meanwhile ensuring accuracy. A third -parry vendor will help ensure transparency in the process. External consultants can offer innovative, forward -thinking solutions tailored to the City's specific needs. Their broader perspective can help staff anticipate future challenges and set a sustainable path for the utility's financial future. Staff has reached out to four vendors to obtain quotes and demonstrations. Staff has been in contact with Ehlers, Abdo, Waterworth and CLA. Ehlers gave an initial price range starting at 206 $26,000 with additional add-ons ranging from $4,000 to $8,500 each. Abdo's quote came in at $23,000 with additional scenario add -on of $2,500 each. Waterworth was a subscription based rate study that offers an innovative platform for updating the study on a continual basis, with the first year at $16,720 and future years approximately half the cost. CLA declined to offer a quote due to a lack of expertise in the Minnesota area. At this time, staff is recommending moving forward with Abdo. Abdo currently performs the City's audit and has expertise with the City's financials which staff believes will help with the overall process. Cost: The cost of the study is $23,000 with the option to run different scenarios for an additional $2,500 per scenario. Staff is recommending the cost not to exceed $28,000. 6. Funding: The study will be funded by the Water, Sewer and Stormwater Funds. 7. Staff Recommendation: Staff is recommending contracting with Abdo to perform a Utility Rate Study, not to exceed $28,000. Proposal from Abdo is attached. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the proposal from Abdo to perform a Utility Rate Study, not to exceed $28,000. Exhibits A. Ehlers Utility Rate Inquiry B. Abdo Utility Rate Study Proposal C. Waterworth Proposal 207 Maggie An From: Nick Anhut <NAnhut@ehlers-inc.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2025 9:09 AM To: Maggie Jin Subject: RE: Utility Rate Study Inquiry Hello Maggie, Thank you and I hope you were able to get some good insights and networking out of the Seminar. Our standard approach to a study is to reach an agreement on the City's preferred scope and establish an hourly rate with a not -to -exceed total cost. We track our time and bill periodically only for actual hours spent on the analysis. To the extent the study's scope is completed in less hours than anticipated, the final cost will come in lower. Below are a couple of options for the City to consider with a potential utility rate study and some general estimates on the associated costs. Base Study: The base level analysis will look at current operating revenue and expenses along with the City's forecasted capital costs for each fund to provide a 10-year cash flow projection will use the existing rate structure to suggest general increases (or decreases) needed to deliver minimum reserve requirements. The financial model will incorporate a review of summary usage data (by tier for water), and be able to insert general development growth assumptions (if any) to shape the projections. The base study would not include analysis necessary to evaluate revisions to the City's current rate structures. Quotes for each fund: • Water Fund - $10,000 • Sewer Fund - $10,000 • Storm Water Fund - $6,000 Fixed /Variable Cost Analysis & Rate Restructure: An optional add -on for the Base Study of each fund will perform the analysis necessary to come up with recommendations on allocating the fixed and variable costs of the water and sewer systems and rate structure redesign options for the City's consideration. For the water fund, it would also include reviewing current tier breaks by customer type to ensure the first tier remains affordable for winter (indoor) usage and upper tiers meet conservation needs in the summer (outdoor) in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, 103G.291 overall. The analysis would require analyzing 12 months of account -specific water consumption. • Water Fund - $8,500 • Sewer Fund - $5,000 • Storm Water Fund — N/A Other Considerations: Looking specifically at the 2025 fee schedule, here are a couple of other potential add-ons to consider: • Wayzata & Long Lake Sewer Billing — It appears there are some Orono properties that are billed for sewer by these cities. Are we understanding that correctly? If so, are they also providing the service? Is there an agreement that should be reviewed and evaluated? o Sewer Fund - $4,000 • Minnetonka Beach — It appears there is a bulk water rate for this city. Is there an agreement that should be reviewed? If so, another option is to provide a wholesale water rate analysis to determine if what is being billed to Minnetonka Beach is appropriate for the demand placed on the system. o Wholesale Water Rate Analysis - $5,000 I will apologize for laying out so many different considerations, but we find that every community's goals and needs are different. There can be instances when a simple analysis to confirm cashflow projections is all that is needed, and others 208 where more rigor is warranted. We certainly hope that you will consider us and we would love to setup a time to discuss these with you to determine what would be the most appropriate course of action and provide a refined proposal. Thank you! Nick Nick Anhut (He I Him I His) Senior Municipal Advisor O: (651) 697-8507 1 ehiers-inc.com EHLERS This e-mail and any attachments may contain information which is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, note that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please destroy it and notify us immediately by return e-mail or at our telephone number, 800-552-1171. Any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author and may not represent the views or opinions of Ehlers Companies. From: Maggie Jin <mjin@oronomn.gov> Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2025 12:49 PM To: Nick Anhut <NAnhut@ehlers-inc.com> Subject: RE: Utility Rate Study Inquiry Hello Nick, Great job presenting today. We would want to perform rate study for water, sewer and stormwater. And yes, we would want to the study to both look at the level of increases needed to pay for future projects planned on our CIP and looking for the study to review history/consumption to inform the City if it would need to change the way it charges. Through the years, we have had numerous complaints on our rates compared to neighboring cities. I did an internal study in 2019 but that was a very informal/simple study and we are looking to get a third party's expertise. Thanks! Maggie An Finance Director 2750 Kelley Parkway I Orono, MN 55356 (952) 249-4611 miin(d),oronomn.gov From: Nick Anhut <NAnhut@ehlers-inc.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2025 5:10 PM To: Maggie Jin <miin@oronomn.gov> Subject: RE: Utility Rate Study Inquiry Hello Maggie, Yes, we do and can certainly put together a general quote. I am wondering if you could elaborate a bit more on the purpose and intent for study: 209 Is the intended study only for certain utility funds (water, sewer, storm) or all? Is the city looking to use the study to inform the level of increases that may be needed to pay for a certain project or CIP, or are you looking for the study to also review billing history/user consumption to inform whether the city should change the way it charges? The latter type of analysis is typically more time consuming, but it would help inform whether certain payers are appropriately being charged for their usage and also whether changes should be made to institute different user classes, tiers, types of fees, and/or negotiate special use agreements for industrial users, etc. Sorry if this over -complicates your question, but I want to be able to provide an informed response or perhaps multiple quotes depending on the scope. Thank you, Nick Nick Anhut (He I Him I His) Senior Municipal Advisor O: (651) 697-8507 1 ehlers-inc.com EHLE1 S This e-mail and any attachments may contain information which is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, note that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please destroy it and notify us immediately by return e-mail or at our telephone number, 800-552-1171. Any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author and may not represent the views or opinions of Ehlers Companies. From: Maggie Jin <miin@oronomn.gov> Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2025 1:03 PM To: Nick Anhut <NAnhut@ehlers-inc.com> Subject: Utility Rate Study Inquiry Hi Nick, When we had met, you mentioned that Ehlers also provide service for Utility rate study. I am going around trying to obtain quotes and get viewpoints from different vendors. Would Ehlers be willing to provide a quote on this service? Thanks! Maggie An Finance Director A 2750 Kelley Parkway I Orono, MN 55356 g (952) 249-4611 mj in&oronomn. gov www.oronomn.gov 210 Alv�ft%o %AA 0 Proposed by Justin Nilson, CPA Partner I Abdo justin.nilson@abdosolutions.com P 952.715.3011 SERVICE PROPOSAL FOR City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, Minnesota 55356 March 03, 2025 1 abdosolutions.com j Mankato, MN - Edina, MN - Scottsdale, AZ 211 Maggie Jin, Finance Director City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, Minnesota 55356 Dear Maggie, Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal to the City of Orono (the City) for partnering with the City on a Utility Rate Study Proposal. Based on our experience with the type of work outlined in the proposal, we are confident our experience and expertise will allow us to exceed your expectations. Our proposal will demonstrate to you that Abdo will be the service provider of choice for your City. Our success has been driven by utilizing staff that is experienced and well trained in governmental planning and operations. We understand attention to detail, project approach, management plan and quality work product are important factors in your selection process. We are confident in our ability to demonstrate we are the firm to select. Our approach to this project is to engage with City staff to ensure we have an exceptional understanding of the project, each individual's role in the project, overall expectations and desires as well as exceptions to standard operations. Throughout the project there will be periodic meetings with City staff to share information, solicit input and provide updates. UTILITY RATE STUDY The City has requested a proposal for preparing a utility rate study for the City, which compromises the Water, Sewer and Stormwater utility rate projections for the years 2025 - 2030, including the related summaries of significant assumptions and accounting policies. The goal of this evaluation will be to project the water and sewer rates taking into account current and future water and sewer projects that are outlined in the City's utility rate study. A projection presents, to the best of management's knowledge and belief, the City's expected cash balances for the projection period assuming managements expected borrowing, capital purchase, expenditure change, and revenue change assumptions. It is based on management's assumptions, reflecting conditions it expects to exist and the course of action it expects would be taken during the projection period assuming the aforementioned assumptions. The projection is designed to provide management and Council a tool for future planning and might not be useful for other purposes. 1 212 Cover Letter Continued The Firm is independent of the City as defined by auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Abdo acknowledges the City has retained an independent registered municipal advisor (IRMA) to assist and advise the City in evaluating information relating to the issuance of municipal securities and/or municipal financial products. Abdo acknowledges the City will rely on advice from their IRMA. Abdo will have no recourse against the City or its IRMA, regarding action or inaction relating to evaluating, commenting on, or responding to financial projects or information received under this Agreement. Abdo acknowledges it is not the registered independent municipal advisor retained by the Municipal Entity Client. We look forward to meeting with you to discuss our proposal and appreciate this opportunity to present Abdo for your consideration. We will contact you within two weeks to discuss your interest in our services and provide any further information you may need. Abdo :Justin Nilson, CPA Partner I Abdo 2213 LIGHTING THE PATH FORWARD The Abdo Difference At Abdo, we believe in the importance of relationships. This core value is the foundation of our approach to delivering the best experience and outcomes for our clients. It's inherent in our people and the way we work. We know that for our clients to be successful, it takes more than having experience and credentials — we take the time to listen to their unique motivations, goals, and challenges. We truly care about their journey and where their path leads. Our process is built around a deep commitment to every client: We light the path forward so you can proceed with confidence. We're the partner you can trust to help you along the way. We're the catalyst who empowers you to reach your goals. L CONFIDENCE PARTNER CATALYST Prepare Illuminating the path ahead Our best work begins when we have a clear, mutual understanding of your needs and expectations, setting the stage for a successful partnership that achieves your goals. By starting with this foundation, we are able to map out the road ahead for you and for our team. Execute Navigating as partners As our team plans and conducts the work, we maintain consistent communication with you so that you can have confidence and peace of mind throughout the process_ This collaboration also helps us to anticipate potential obstacles and adjust our strategy as we work towards your goal_ Deliver Enlightening communication Relationships are at the core of our values and delivering on our promises to build trust is our top priority. But it goes further than that. We help guide you forward by providing clarity and insights behind the results_ Listen Empowering you to move forward The work may be done, but we aren't. It's our turn to take time to review outcomes so that we can both learn and improve, helping to uncover potential challenges and identify future opportunities. Nothing is more empowering than being ready for the next steps and knowing that you've got a partner who is invested in your ongoing success. 3214 Your Team Based on our ability to provide the requested services, our shared core values, and an understanding of your unique needs, we have the resources, knowledge, people and services to light the path forward for your city. We have assembled a team with relevant experience who are committed to working with you to ensure success. Each team member is briefly profiled below, and full biographies can be found in Appendix C. Partner justin.nilson@abdosolutions.com P 952.715.3011 Manager ty/ersee@abdoso/utions.com P 952.939.3230 0 M ti I Utility Rate Study Approach PROJECT APPROACH The following information outlines the approach we will take for the project. INITIAL ASSESSMENT The first step to this project is to review and analyze data provided by the City. After this review, Abdo will meet with the city team to discuss overall anticipated project expectations, outcomes and timelines. UTILITY RATE REVIEW The objective of our engagement is to prepare a projection in accordance with guidelines for the presentation of a projection established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) based on information provided by you. We will conduct our engagement in accordance with Statements on Standards for Accounting and Review Services (SSARS) promulgated by the Accounting and Review Services Committee of the AICPA and comply with the AICPA's Code of Professional Conduct, including the ethical principles of integrity, objectivity, professional competence, and due care. We are not required to, and will not, verify the accuracy or completeness of the information you will provide to us for the engagement or otherwise gather evidence for the purpose of expressing an opinion or a conclusion. Accordingly, we will not express an opinion or a conclusion or provide any assurance on the projection. Our engagement cannot be relied upon to identify or disclose any misstatements in the projection, including those caused by fraud or error, or to identify or disclose any wrongdoing within the entity or noncompliance with laws and regulations. I 2 216 Utility Rate Study Approach Continued UTILITY RATE STUDY PROCESS • Gather input from city management • Evaluate Water, Sewer and Stormwater operational and infrastructure expenditures — both current and projected • Determine the impact of future bond issuance on users of system • Review the current rate tiers and run scenarios to determine if other models or tier levels should be considered • Develop projection of future operational and infrastructure costs • Provide projection based on existing rate structure based on existing debt and future projects • Review and discuss outcomes with city management and City Council CITY EXPECTATIONS As part of the utility rate review, the City agrees to: • Devote uninterrupted time to working with us as needed • Make candid representations about your plans and expectations • Make all management decisions and perform all management functions • Provide information on future capital improvements with collaboration of the City Engineer • Provide an individual responsible to review and accept our work UNANTICIPATED SERVICES While the fixed price entitles the City to unlimited consultation with us, if your question or issue requires additional research and analysis beyond the consultation, the work will be subject to an additional price, payment terms, and scope to be agreed upon before the service is performed and a change order will be issued to document this understanding. Furthermore, the parties agree that if an unanticipated need arises (training to different groups, researching a new issue, etc.) we hereby agree to perform this additional work at a mutually agreed upon price. This service will be priced separately to the City, using a change order. 6217 Utility Rate Study Approach Continued PRICE GUARANTEE If you ever receive an invoice without first authorizing the service, payment terms, and price, you are not obligated to pay for that service. FINANCIAL INVESTMENT Utility Rate Study Total $23,000 $23,000 Payment Schedule: Contract Execution $11,500 Project Completion $11,500 This fixed fee agreement entitles the City to a single rate recommendation based on a set of assumptions. At the request of the City, Abdo may run alternative rate scenarios. Each additional scenario will be provided at a cost of $2,500. In an effort to reduce environmental impact, you will receive printable, downloadable PDFs of your report. To receive one (1) paper report, you will be charged $150 for a set-up fee. Additional paper copies will be charged at the rate of $50 per report. This quote is valid for forty-five (45) days. Abdo will begin preparing the utility rate study for the City within six weeks of execution of the agreement. Completion of the utility rate study is expected to be May 1 st, however; this is dependent on the time frame in which the City provides information to Abdo for the study. The stated fee is based on anticipated cooperation from your personnel and the assumption that unexpected circumstances will not be encountered during the engagement. If significant additional time is necessary, we will discuss it with you and arrive at a new fee estimate before we incur the additional costs. You agree to hold us harmless and to release, indemnify, and defend us from any liability or costs, including attorney's fees, resulting from management's knowing misrepresentations to us. QUALITY ASSURANCE Quality is critical the success and integrity of this project. Our internal processes ensure that all work is reviewed and approved prior to moving to the next phase of a project. Our processes require that work is reviewed by a staff member at a higher level than the person that completed it and ultimately the work is signed off on by the Engagement Partner. CONCLUSION Throughout this process we will be in constant communication with the city team to ensure their needs are being met. By utilizing our operational experience as well as our knowledge of governmental accounting, our 50 plus years of experience providing services to Minnesota municipalities and our knowledge of regulations in the State of Minnesota we will provide the City information and recommendations for financial processes. We are excited about this opportunity and the benefits the City will recognize as this utility rate study is finalized. 7218 We believe technology should enhance our service offerings, making our work less intrusive, our time with you more productive and everyone's data more secure. The use of technology in our services enables us to streamline our processes and helps to automate certain functions of our work so we are able to spend more time analyzing our results and working directly with you. Through the outbreak of COVID-19, our team has been able to seamlessly move to a completely remote work environment with no loss of productivity, cooperation, or communication. Since March 17, 2020, our staff has been successfully conducting remote services using the latest video conferencing and secure file sharing technology. Through Zoom, Microsoft Teams, or whatever technology your city may use, our team will continue to work through normal procedures, including regular meetings with you during the engagement to ensure effective collaboration with your team. We take the security of our client's data - and our own - very seriously. A number of systems are in place to ensure the safety of your city's data. We operate on a remote distributed infrastructure leveraging Microsoft's Cloud Platform Azure. This not only allows our staff to securely work from any computer, anywhere, any time, but also provides large- scale, cutting -edge technology and security for your data. Your data is housed in secure data centers that reside exclusively in the U.S. and not on laptops or local servers which could be stolen or misplaced. We continually provide security awareness training to our staff members to ensure they are good digital stewards of your data. In addition to this, we also consult bi annually with 3rd party security experts to conduct risk assessments and conduct annual penetration tests. IT ALSO MEANS: E All firm staff use dual authentication to ensure that every login to our remote environment is secure and authorized. C All data is saved on redundant servers and data centers so if one server fails, another immediately takes over with no data lost. E All data is backed up continually which means we always have an extra copy for safe -keeping. Our cloud platform, Azure, is globally trusted by companies and governments and has numerous security compliance standard they adhere to. Reports of these can be provided as requested. E All incoming emails, attachments, and embedded links are scanned for viruses prior to landing in our inbox, which allows us to operate with more protection from phishing emails, malware attacks, and other digital threats. 8219 I CITY OF CRYSTAL Kim Therres Assistant City Manager P 763.531.1132 SERVICES PROVIDED Long-term Plan Outsourced Finance Director Process Evaluation (ProEval) Utility Rate Study Budgeting Audit Preparation Utility Billing Payroll Processing CITY OF SHOREWOOD Marc Nevinski City Administrator P 952.960.7905 SERVICES PROVIDED Annual Audit Outsourced Accounting Services Utility Rate Study I like their willingness to discuss challenges and provide good, thoughtful guidance." CITY OF BECKER Mark Ebensteiner I Finance Director a CITY OF COLOGNE Michelle Morrison City Clerk / Administrator P 952.466.2064 SERVICES PROVIDED Utility Rate Study Annual Audit Why Partner with Abdo LIGHTING THE PATH FORWARD In a world of ever -changing complexity, people need caring, empathetic and highly skilled professionals they can depend on to provide the right advice and solutions for them. Our clients seek growth and success, but also want security and confidence. For over 60 years, Abdo has provided insights for our clients to help them achieve their goals. That same innovative spirit is also what has earned us the title of being one of the top accounting firms in the Midwest. Abdo is a better firm today because of the efforts we made to support a culture driven by our core values of growth, relationships, and teamwork. With this foundation in place, we have successfully helped our clients identify and break through their own growth barriers. Every challenge they face is an opportunity for us to listen, understand and empower them with solutions and a plan to achieve their goals. It's fulfilling to serve as the catalyst that helps them overcome obstacles that block their progress. When it comes to our working relationships, we are partners. We're confidants. We're the catalyst that sparks true business growth, providing guidance through every challenge and opportunity along the way. ABOUT ABDO Abdo is a full -service accounting and consulting firm that delivers customized strategies and innovative solutions to help businesses, governments and nonprofits succeed. With more than 200 professionals and over six decades of experience, Abdo is ranked as one of the top accounting firms in the Midwest. It is a licensed CPA firm with offices located in Minneapolis and Mankato, Minnesota, and Scottsdale, AZ. Abdo's commitment to its clients is to gain in- depth knowledge of their unique challenges, opportunities, and needs. Through this consultative approach, Abdo partners with organization leaders to light the path forward to confidently reach their goals. "Listening to our clients' needs, understanding their challenges, and adjusting how we work together is key to our partnership with the people we serve." -- Steve McDonald, CPA I Managing Partner 10 221 I OUR COMMITMENT TO DIVERSITY, EQUITY, & INCLUSION At Abdo, we recognize the need for continuous improvement in diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives throughout our firm and the accounting industry at large. We aim to build a firm that provides opportunities for people that are as diverse as the clients we serve. We believe that when we understand each other better, we grow better together. Over the past several years, we have increased our efforts to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion within our firm and community through training opportunities, guest speakers, and cultural awareness activities. Our Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Committee continues to implement new ideas, projects, and initiatives to move our firm forward through learning, understanding, and improving on these issues. We continueto increase our number of women at the highest leadership level. We strive for continued growth in our ability to attract and retain women and people of color within our firm and we are working towards greater equity and diversity for all within our industry. Abdo is committed to advancing the interest in accounting careers for students of color at both the high school and college level. In 2022,the firm was chosen as one of just ten firms 1n the nation to host an ethnic minority accounting student as part of the AICPA's PC PS George Willie Ethnically Diverse Student Scholarship and Internship Program. The recipient of this scholarship remains with the firm today as a senior associate in our tax department. In order to build a more inclusive work environment, the f rm has implemented diversity and inclusion education through partnering with expert speakers and trainers. Please let us know if you have any ideas on how we can improve diversity, equity, and inclusion at Abdo. 59% of our employees are female 56% of our management level employees are female 18% of our interns this year are people of color 11222 ABDO DIVERSE SCHOLARSHIP & INTERNSHIP PROGRAM Abdo was a proud co-sponsor of the AICPA PCPS George Willie Ethnically Diverse Student Scholarship & Internship, which allows 10 ethnically diverse accounting students the opportunity to be awarded internships with a firm that has been selected M by the AICPA. Upon conclusion of this successful partnership, we were inspired to create our own DEI Sponsorship program, annually awarding a rising diverse accounting student a scholarship & internship. a AICPA J DEIlnitiatives PARTNERSHIP WITH NABA Abdo is proud to sponsor the Minnesota State University, Mankato Chapter of NABA (National Association of Black Accountants) Inc. NABA is committed to increasing the number of African Americans in the accounting and finance professions and to promoting their success. As a firm, we are invested in not only increasing diversity within our organization but support diversifying the industry as a whole. We are committed to providing guidance and mentorship along with financial supporttothis organization GREATER MANKATO GROWTH DEi COLLABORATIVE --s-r r+uuer' DIVERSITY, EOU ITY, -d INCLUSION G'vLltJOa6a w �c4�Ccnu��: to Abdo is a founding sponsor and member of Greater Mankato Growth's (the Mankato region's chamber of commerce) DEI Collaborative. This collaborative was formed to discuss what we could do as individuals, organizations, and the community to increase diversity and make our community a welcoming one. Together, we explored our individual biases, developed action plans to make a difference within our organization, and pledged to continue the work to make our community inclusive. CEO ACTION PLEDGE We are proud signatories of the CEO Action Pledge, a pledge signed by CEOs from different sectors, sizes, and geographical area to support more inclusive workplaces. As part of this pledge, we work toward goals including DEI education and recruiting. We promise to have the difficult conversations and make our firm, and this industry —one that better reflects the communities we live and work. CEO ACTION FOR DIVERSITY&INCLUSION COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT We are committed to the continued support and advancement of women in our firm and in our communities. One of the ways we do this is through a partnership with YWCA Mankato, an organization whose mission is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all. We are proud sponsors of the Elizabeth Kearney Women's Leadership Program, Women's Leadership Conference, and Women of Distinction event. 0 A ywca WMEN-s Le El niv Every year, we come together as a firm to participate in what we call a "Day of Action." This gives us an opportunity to give back to organizations within our communities that support underserved populations. You can catch us volunteering at a food shelf, building houses, or helping at an After School Program. In addition, the firm pledges 24 hours of VTO (Volunteer Time Off), for each employee to volunteer at the nonprofit of their choosing. We truly believe we are better, together. 12 223 Appendix A AGREEMENT FOR FINANCIAL SERVICES 13 224 Agreement for Financial Services THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into on March 03, 2025 by and between the City of Orono, Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the "Client"), and Abdo (hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor"). Articles of Agreement & Recitals WHEREAS, the Client is authorized and empowered to secure from time to time certain professional services through contracts with qualified consultants; and WHEREAS, the Contractor understands and agrees that: 1. The Contractor will act as an Independent Contractor in the performance of all duties under this Agreement. Accordingly, the Contractor shall be responsible for payment of all taxes, including federal, state and local taxes and professional/business license fees arising out of the Contractor's activities; 2. The Contractor shall have no authority to bind the Client for the performance of any services or to obligate the Client. The Contractor is not an agent, servant, or employee of the Client and shall not make any such representations or hold himself/herself out as such; 3. The Contractor shall be the exclusive outsourced accounting service provider for the Client during the term of this Agreement; 4. The Contractor shall perform all professional services in a competent and professional manner, acting in the best interests of the Client at all times. 5. The Contractor shall not accrue any continuing contract rights for the services performed under this Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, it is agreed as follows: ARTICLE I INCORPORATION OF RECITALS The recitals and agreement set forth above are hereby incorporated into this Agreement. ARTICLE II LIABILITY INSURANCE Section 1 Liability Insurance: The Contractor shall obtain professional liability insurance, at their expense with liability insurance coverage minimums in the amount of $2,000,000, which Contractor must secure and maintain during the term of this Agreement. Contractor will provide Client with proof of liability insurance coverage under this Agreement in writing upon request by the Client. 14 225 Agreement for Financial Services Continued ARTICLE III DURATION OF THE AGREEMENT Section 1 Duration: This Agreement shall commence upon date of execution by all parties and will remain in effect until December 31, 2025 unless earlier terminated as provided in Sections 2 and 3. Section 2 Client's Termination Rights: The Client may terminate this Agreement upon sixty (60) days written notice in the event the Client determines in its sole discretion that it is not in the Client's best interest to continue using Contractor's services. The Client may terminate on ten (10) days written notice if the Contractor fails to perform its obligations under this Agreement. Section 3 Contractor's Termination Rights: Contractor may terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice to Client in the event Client does not pay Contractor compensation as required under Article 5, Section 9 within fifteen (15) days after invoice is received by Client. In the event of non-payment within thirty (30) days, Contractor shall give the Client an opportunity to cure the default by giving a notice of such non-payment and an additional five (5) days after the Client's receipt of the notice to remit such payment, prior to giving a notice of termination. Contractor can also terminate the Agreement with one hundred twenty (120) days written notice if the Contractor believes it is in its best interests to terminate the Agreement. ARTICLE IV GENERAL Section 1 Authorized Client Agent: The Client's authorized agent for the purpose of administration of this Agreement is the Finance Director. Said agent shall have final authority for approval and acceptance of the Contractor's services performed under this Agreement and shall further have responsibility for administration of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. All notices under this Agreement shall be sent to the person and address indicated below on the signature lines. Section 2 Amendments: No amendments or variations of the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be valid unless in writing and signed by the parties. Section 3 Assignability: The Contractor's rights and obligations under this Agreement are not assignable or transferable. Section 4 Data: Any data or materials, including, but not limited to, reports, studies, photographs, negatives, or any and all other documents prepared by the Contractor or its outside consultants in the performance of the Contractor's obligations under this Agreement shall be the exclusive property of the Client, and any such data and materials shall be remitted to the Client by the Contractor upon completion, expiration, or termination of this Agreement. Further, any such data and materials shall be treated and maintained by the Contractor and its outside consultants in accordance with applicable federal, state and local laws. Further, Contractor will have access to data collected or maintained by the Client to the extent necessary to perform Contractor's obligations under this Agreement. Contractor agrees to maintain all data obtained from the Client in the same manner as the Client is required under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13 or other applicable law (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"). Contractor will not release or disclose the contents of data classified as not public to any person except at the written direction of the Client. Upon receipt of a request to obtain and/or review data as defined in the Act, Contractor will immediately notify the Client. The Client shall provide written direction to Contractor regarding the request within a reasonable time, not to exceed fifteen (15) days. The Client agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend Contractor for any liability, expense, cost, damages, claim, and action, including attorneys' fees, arising out of or related to Contractor's complying with the Client's direction. Subject to the aforementioned, Contractor agrees to defend and indemnify the Client from any claim, liability, damage or loss asserted against the Client as a result of Contractor's failure to comply with the requirements of the Act. Upon termination and/or completion of this Agreement, Contractor agrees to return all data to the Client, as requested by the Client. 15226 Agreement for Financial Services Continued ARTICLE IV - CONTINUED GENERAL (CONTINUED) Section 5 Entire Agreement: This Agreement is the entire agreement between the Client and the Contractor, and it supersedes all prior written or oral agreements. There are no other covenants, promises, undertakings, or understandings outside of this Agreement other than those specifically set forth. Any term, condition, prior course of dealing, course of performance, usage of trade, understanding, or agreement purporting to modify, vary, supplement, or explain any provision of this Agreement is null and void and of no effect unless in writing and signed by representatives of both parties authorized to amend this Agreement. Section 6 Severability: All terms and covenants contained in this Agreement are severable. In the event any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, this Agreement shall be interpreted as if such invalid terms or covenants were not contained herein, and such holding shall not invalidate or render unenforceable any other provision hereof. Section 7 Contractor Fiscal Decision Waiver: Contractor is responsible for providing the Client with timely and accurate financial recommendations and information that allows the Council the ability to make final financial decisions. Contractor will provide final financial recommendations but is not responsible for the final decisions made regarding financial matters. Section 8 Compensation: The parties agree that the Contractor shall be paid compensation for the services provided hereunder, payable for work performed in accordance with this Agreement, based on the fees indicated on the Value page of this proposal. Additional fees will not be incurred without prior approval of the Client. Initial invoice for anticipated first month fees will be sent within 10 days of the execution of this agreement. Monthly installment fees will be invoiced throughout the remainder of this Agreement. If the Agreement is for an hourly fee basis, invoices will be sent monthly. Section 9 Additional Services: Should the Client request additional services in addition to the Contracted Services, the Contractor will provide the Client with proposed fees for the services to be provided. The Client shall provide a written or electronic confirmation prior to the proposed services implementation. Section 10 Outside Contractors: It shall be the responsibility of Contractor to compensate any other outside consultants retained or hired by Contractor to fulfill their obligations under this Agreement and shall be responsible for their work and Contractor, by using outside contractors, shall not be relieved of its obligations under this Agreement. Section 11 Municipal Advisor: Abdo acknowledges the Client may/has retained an independent registered municipal advisor (IRMA) to assist and advise the Client in evaluating information relating to the issuance of municipal securities and/or municipal financial products. Abdo acknowledges the Client will rely on advice from their IRMA. Abdo will have no recourse against the Client or its IRMA, regarding action or inaction relating to evaluating, commenting on, or responding to financial projects or information received under this Agreement. Abdo acknowledges it is not the registered independent municipal advisor retained by the Municipal Entity Client. 16227 Appendix B AGREEMENT FOR THE PROVISION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Agreement for the Provision of Professional Services WHEREFORE, this Agreement was entered into on the date set forth below and the undersigned, by execution hereof, represent that they are authorized to enter into this Agreement on behalf of the respective parties and state that this Agreement has been read by them and that the undersigned understand and fully agree to each, all and every provision hereof, and hereby, acknowledge receipt of a copy hereof. City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, Minnesota 55356 A Maggie Jin Abdo 5201 Eden Avenue, Suite 250 Edina, Minnesota 55436 Justin Nilson, CPA Partner I Abdo March 03, 2025 18 229 Appendix C TEAM BIOS 19230 TEAM MEMBER BIO Justin Nilson CPA Partner justin.nilson@abdosolutions.com Direct Line 952.715.3011 Justin joined the Firm in 2012 after graduating from Saint John's University. His work experience includes assisting in the audits of several municipal, school district and Single Audits. Justin is active within the Firm, participating in numerous internal task forces created to develop streamlined processes and efficiency tools, as well as assisting with internal initiatives around Recruiting and Technology. EDUCATION • Bachelor of Arts in Accounting, Saint John's University • Continuing professional education as required by the AICPA and U.S. Government Accountability Office PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants • Minnesota Society of Certified Public Accountants • Minnesota Government Finance Officers Association QUALIFICATIONS • 9 years of experience auditing local governments and schools in Minnesota • Over 90 percent of billable time relates to governmental clients • Experienced in municipal government long term financial plans • Experienced in models for various municipal government specific areas such as utility rate, tax levy and debt analysis 20 231 TEAM MEMBER BIO Tyler See CPA Manager tyler.see@abdosolutions.com Direct Line 952.939.3230 Tylerjoined the firm in 2017 after completing his Accounting degree from Minnesota State University, Mankato. He was a government audit intern during the 2017 audit season. Tyler works with a variety of local governments and schools in Minnesota providing annual audits. In addition to his expertise in annual auditing, Tyler is experienced in municipal long-term financial plans and utility rate studies. EDUCATION • Bachelor of Science in Accounting, Minnesota State University- Mankato Graduated Cum Laude • Master of Accounting, Minnesota State University — Mankato • Continuing professional education as required by the AICPA and U.S. Government Accountability Office PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants • Minnesota Society of Certified Public Accountants • Minnesota Government Finance Offier's Association QUALIFICATIONS • 8 years of experience in auditing local governments and schools in Minnesota • Over 90 percent of billable time relates to governmental clients • Works extensively with Microsoft Office and several accounting software • Experienced in municipal government long-term financial plans and utility rate studies 21232 TEAM MEMBER BIO Robbie Smith Associate robbie.smith@abdosolutions.com Direct Line 952.715.3022 Robbie joined the Firm in 2022 as an Associate with the Government group after completing his accounting and finance degree from Southwest Minnesota State University. His work includes assisting in the audits of many of the Firm's governmental clients. Prior to joining Abdo, Robbie spent two springs as a tax and audit intern at a firm in Marshall, Minnesota and one summer as a cost accounting intern for a cabinet manufacturer in Waconia, Minnesota. EDUCATION • Bachelor of Science in Accounting and Finance, Southwest Minnesota State University o Summa Cum Laude • Master of Business Administration degree, Southwest Minnesota State University o Concentration in Leadership • Continuing professional education as required by the AICPA and U.S. Government Accountability Office MEMBERSHIPS • GFOA Associate QUALIFICATIONS • 2+ years of experience in auditing local governments and schools in Minnesota • 1 year of experience in audit and attest services primarily for farms and small businesses • Over 90 percent of billable time relates to governmental clients • Works extensively with Microsoft Office • Experience in annual TIF reporting for local municipals 22 233 VlU WATERW0RTHTM Continuous Utility Rate Management Maggie Jin, Finance Director Orono, MN Dylan Green dylang@waterworth.net (206)848-7111 02/19/2025 0 ti Cl © 2025 Muniworth Innovations dba Waterworth // waterworth.net @ @ o . o CO @ @ @ M�0' WWATERWORTH OUR MISSION Empowering financially sustainable local government services and winning back the public trust. © 2024 Muniworth Innovations dba Waterworth // wate rwo rth. n et 235 W A T E R W 4 R T H '" � 0 EKE SIH O. Based on conversations with Orono staff, we understand your key goal is: Effectively communicate funding plans and present data - driven recommendations Related priorities: Proactively renew and replace aging infrastructure Clearly identify long term capital plans Ensure full cost recovery while maintaining healthy cash reserves Maintain a strategic financial plan that leverages the best mix of cash, debt and Federal or State funding Integrate planning and ensure easy data -transfer between staff Maintain internal financial plan for utility funds which reflect evolving capital improvement plans Maintain good communication between staff, elected officials and the public Protect customer affordability Create an internal model which acts as a buffer for succession planning. Waterworth can help the Orono achieve these goals and priorities through Continuous Utility Rate Management. © 2024 Muniworth Innovations dba Waterworth//waterworth.net 236 WW A T E R W O R T H '" There are two methods of rates management commonly used today. When people want total control and low cost, they build in-house models with Microsoft Excel. We all love Excel - you can build what you want, it's flexible and practically free. It also has headaches. With Waterworth you have the control but without the headaches that come with maintaining an Excel spreadsheet. It's easy to use and very cost effective. Other communities use rate consultants. They do an excellent job. They're experts and bring credibility to a council presentation. Similarly, the Waterworth team can step in as needed to do the heavy lifting and facilitate communications and action among staff and your elected officials. Waterworth also addresses a critical gap by enabling easy Communication & Collaboration between individual departments, city administration and elected officials. With Waterworth, options can be carefully and efficiently reviewed, updated, reported on, compared with other scenarios. You can communicate difficult financial stories with ease so Council and the public can really buy in to the right decisions. EAControl Low Cost Like MS Excel 00 Continuous Process Cloud Based Platform Communication Collaboration R 7 3rd Party J Heavy lifting Like Consultants The thing our customers love the most is how we enable Continuous Rate Management. Rate studies are static in time. But variables keep changing - inflation is high, projects are getting repriced and reshuffled, interest rates fluctuate, sometimes you might get a grant, but you don't want to plan on it. With Waterworth, you can stay in total control of all the moving parts while keeping everyone on the same page. This makes managing rates effortless and builds a synergistic relationship between city and elected officials. © 2024 Muniworth Innovations dba Waterworth //waterworth.net 237 WW A T E R W O R T H '" LONG-TERM FINANCIAL MODEL Develop a full -cost recovery model to understand long-term revenue requirements. Integrate CIP, Master Plans, and future capital reinvestment budgeting along with debt service scenarios, cash reserve policies, and tie it all back to a rate schedule. ASSET REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE Leverage your GIS data to produce a long-term asset replacement schedule to understand the cost of sustainable ownership, and benchmark how much to invest annually in capital renewal to avoid emergencies and preserve intergenerational equity. COST OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Review historical demand patterns and work towards a true cost -of -service model for each customer category including wholesale customers. Explore cost reallocation scenarios to see how you can make rates more equitable. RATE DESIGN Onboard billing data, analyze your current rate structure, easily model new rate structure options and immediately visualize the billing impacts of various options - what the changes will mean for revenues and affordability for residents. SCENARIO EXPLORATION Perhaps one of the most powerful features is the ability to quickly create and manage scenarios, compare them visually using 3 comparative modes (difference, side -by -side, overlay) and combine scenarios from different service areas into one complete organization -wide model. © 2024 Muniworth Innovations dba Waterworth //waterworth.net 238 WW A T E R W 4 R T H '" SAVE TIME AND AGGRAVATION Take pride in telling a better financial story. This makes communicating tough, complex issues easier leading to more efficient conversations. In the end, smarter decisions are made more quickly and with very little effort. Everyone saves time and aggravation. LEVERAGE YOUR DATA TO DRIVE BETTER DECISIONS Up-to-date data reflects the real -world circumstances of your community so you can have confidence that analysis and recommendations plot the best path forward in real-time. Waterworth is compatible with many other systems, so on boarding is relatively easy. ENSURE LONG-TERM FINANCIAL SUSTAI NABI LITY Plan for intergenerational equity by first determining long-term cost of sustainable ownership of infrastructure. Then become financially resilient and mitigate uncertainty about future events through better planning by developing and exploring scenarios. LEVERAGE PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT THAT'S TAILORED TO YOU Short-staffed? Think of us as a specialized part of your team. We're here to make sure you are asking the right questions and making progress towards community goals. Support is here, whenever and however you need it: we'll assist with data needs, analysis, scenario exploration, presentation, and succession. We've got your back! © 2024 Muniworth Innovations dba Waterworth//waterworth.net 239 bid W A T E R W 4 R T H '" Included with all services. We're here for you by chat, email, phone or zoom as much or as little as needed toensure you meet your goals. Unlimited 1:1 coaching with all included tools Expert advice with Financial Modeling, Cost of Service Analysis, Infrastructure Analysis and Rate Design Onboarding and refining of external financial model or Pro Forma into Waterworth's financial model Assistance with project management and organization to help meet deadlines and stay on track of priorities Training for effective communication with elected officials and between departments Assistance with analysis of complex datasets, and impact analysis of any scenarios or proposed changes Assistance with presenting models internally or to Boards/Councils Assistance with onboarding instructions for Assets, Population, Flows or Billing Data Training of new staff on Waterworth Facilitating succession transitions © 2024 Muniworth Innovations dba Waterworth // waterworth.net 240 WWATERWORTH'" i. METHODOLOGY Waterworth is based on the fundamentals of rate design as outlined in AWWA M1 and WEF 27. These manuals set the industry accepted standard practices in financial planning and rate making to establish cost -based rates, fees, and charges to recover the full costs associated with utilities. 6\\ American Water Works Association Dedicated to the World's Most Important Resource' Water Environment Federation the water quality peoples;. N*+ Financing and Charges for Wastewolep Systems • Fsset Managammt • OpB2iin9 dM Cdpil3l Costs andly5is antl diluc8linn • Intag2les cost alWration artl rate making :. $l unhty lollowetl by US cusfamary unNs WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION © 2024 Muniworth Innovations dba Waterworth//waterworth.net 241 bid W A T E R W 4 R T H '" Waterworth is trusted by over 300 cities and towns across North America. -. Calgar0y IRA R 9,9 — - ------ — — —. WASHINGTnN 1 9119 •� nd �0 MONTANA Bm Billo gs p u 0:1 E9EG Winnipeg _.. rywTH TA NEW 9 V vMontreal 10 OAE GCry ea .� WISW NSIN O A� IJtlawa E- 91 `� SOUTH ..... ---.� YE•.6 T OAKOTA WYOMING __, __ Ljrr�r}y Q� �! To nto vQ/- j --- ..::�!N YLYA ./OrEIA' M4Nw vv v...�8 NEBRASKA O-ha 9hv vyL %av�-�� RI Tv 9 9 9I RE s ILLIN615 INOIANA C Phlladel NEVAOA united States �9 -- f N� urAr+ v ICaOity1r11ndfanapohsClncln irnARVLSacrament T St. Louf SV ® to'. CCL9RA69 v KANSAS MISSOURI YIRGI NIA'W8S111,R9gtOn SanFvSe KENTUCKY ViRGI CALI FORNIA LBS Ve 85 v -9 - v Nashville l� OKLAHOMA v TENNE55' KITH v ll o rglle M oPhis v r;4'A eLIN /yam /V�RKR NSAS Cheriolla. �S lea �r11�A NEW MEXICC • _ ----. .. Atl onrd SOUTIO MISSISSIPPI o CAR9L NA San Diego�` '- Phoenl& •as --- ALA09" . cpT o —'-- GEORCIA y. ,9 a ERAS 9 9 eFO udad Juarez -- ------ ClILIECRNIA------' --- -- J CI 59N9RA `, LOIIICIANA ackr9'h Er Han cNINunHu�A, ---'�� 5an. °tonlo N—crlaans SAINT PAUL MINNESOTA City Of Burnsville CITYOF v 1 owl S AN 5STCLOUD � �pripgHill MINNESOTA �\ �� MINNESOTA - SILLP 1 v 9r LEONV�4LLFY L Bit ilslr Louksville ' AG1S� �� ^atlB `^-� WARRENVILLE \ ENDON Grarid ]unction COUNlY Sp { Mp` Y. g�OxBLA6 -VA iX>!stf�%%�� �i i `o�nCO 1� �� • • City of Vision �Ir— © 2024 Muniworth Innovations dba Waterworth //waterworth.net q c 242 wo-- --E WW A T E R W O R T H '" "We informed our Board that inflation has severely impacted the costs of our capital projects and it became clearthat without a $7,000,000 bond, we would be in trouble. It is amazing how much easier this process is now that we have Waterworth. Whenever we have discussions with our Board we use Waterworth to review and explore options. Because we do this frequently, the board is familiar with the model and so they trust in Waterworth. The discussion regardingthe need to obtain the $7,000,000 bond lasted less than 10 minutes." Wes Smith, CFO �` Virgin Valley Water District, Nevada �FR pj5��� Yvonne Acuna, Assistant Finance Director City of Leon Valley Texas John Mastandona, Director of Finance Village of Western Springs, Illinois YOF Lisa Vollbrecht, Public Utilities Director T.CLOUD JNESOTA City of St. Cloud, Minnesota 243 WW A T E R W 4 R T H '" mb I Description 1st Service Area Software Access to Water Service Area Unlimited Support and Advising for Water $5,960 2nd Service Area Software Access to Wastewater Service Area Unlimited Support and Advising for $5,560 Wastewater 3rd Service Area Software Access to Stormwater Service Area Unlimited Support and Advising for $5,200 Stormwater Included: Total USD: $16,720 • Implementation • Unlimited User Licenses • Unlimited Support and Advising • Training • Workshop Facilitation • Presentation • Assistance with: Data Onboarding, Data Analysis, Scenario Exploration 00 000 0 00 Servicearew include Water, Wastewater, Stormwater, Airport, Fire Rescue, Solid Waste, !I[I� Roads, Fleet, General Fund, Electric, Marinas, Recycling, and many more municipal services! Subscription effective date is on the day of the Getting Started Meeting when user sign -in accounts are created. Renewal invoices will be sent 60 days before the anniversary of the effective date. Prices set to increase by 5% per year. © 2024 Muniworth Innovations dba Waterworth//waterworth.net 244 WWATERWORTH'" Waterworth is a unique and specialized solution with no comparable alternative. No customer has ever had to procure Waterworth through an RFP process. Sole Source Documentation available upon request: ■ Template memo to council/board that you can edit ■ Detailed documentation describing what is unique and specialized about Waterworth in support of sole sourcing 0 2022 Muniworth Innovations dhaWaterworLh//waterworLh.net 245 AGENDA ITEM Date: March 10, 2025 Item: 21 Title: LA24-000059, 215 North Arm Lane, Preliminary Plat: "Idyllvale Shores" Resolution 7559 Presenter: Melanie Curtis, Planner Section: Community Development Report Purpose: This application contemplates preliminary plat approval to create five, 2+ acre buildable lots and a new public road extending North Arm Lane within the LR-IA and RR- 1B zoning districts. Three non-lakeshore lots and two lakeshore lots will be created. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline: The application was received on October 23rd and considered to be substantially complete on November 6, 2024. The 120-day subdivision application review timing was scheduled to end on March 6, 2025. Due to the delay caused by the cancelation of the January planning commission meeting, the applicant requested an extension until May 6th (Exhibit E). 3. Background: This application involves the three individual tax parcels owned by Bradley and Carol Pass (who passed away in May of 2024), and their son, Gabriel Pass. The developer, Blue Pencil Collective, represents the Pass Family. The project contemplates preliminary plat approval to create five, 2+ acre buildable lots and a new road. Until recently, the property contained a residential home and outbuildings. Wooded slopes and wetlands make up the majority of the land to be developed. The east portion of the property abuts Lake Minnetonka, the wetlands have been delineated and are depicted on the preliminary plat drawing with the MCWD-required buffers shown. The developer proposes a conforming development with the exception of the road length, which exceeds the City's 1,000 foot limit for dead-end roads. The current dead end road (North Arm Lane) is approximately 930 feet in length as it extends off of North Arm Drive to the northern dead end. The new road will extend approximately 640 feet beyond North Arm Lane's current dead end to the new cul-de-sac. This configuration results in a total road length of 1,570 linear feet to the cul-de-sac. The City standards limit dead-end roads to a maximum of 1,000 linear feet. There does not appear to be a viable alternate access to the property that would conform to the 1,000 foot limit. The additional cul-de-sac is proposed as the developer's solution to satisfy the City's dimensional requirement for the road radius as it curves to the west. The developer originally proposed the new road extension to be private. However, due to the dead- end nature of the current public roadway, without a proper cul-de-sac or turnaround, winter maintenance and snow removal are challenging. The City Engineer's recommended the road extension to be dedicated as right-of-way on the plat making the road public. Future financial and maintenance burdens of a new city road may be offset by beneficial logistical improvements resulting in better maneuverability for snowplows and other vehicles (delivery trucks, school buses, etc.) in the cul-de-sac. 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment: 246 The Planning Commission reviewed the application originally in November 2024. The application was tabled in November after the Commission directed the developer to make some changes to the overall lot layout, dimensions, and access. A revised preliminary plat was reviewed by the Planning Commission at their February 18th meeting. The revised plan addressed all of the original lot dimensional issues, however the proposed roadway did not meet the City's engineering standards for the turning radius at the corner, and exceeded the 1,000 foot dead end road limit. As a result, after receiving additional public comment and discussion, the Commission voted 5 - 2 in favor of denial as submitted. The developer submitted a turning radius exhibit the morning of the meeting and comments from the City engineer were not available by the time of the meeting. Public Comment: Comments from the public were received during the public hearings at both the November and February Planning Commission meetings; written comments are attached as Exhibit F. 6. Staff Recommendation: The developer has provided a revised plan which continues to conform to the minimum lot requirements and addresses the engineer's and Planning Commission's concern with the turning radius. There is no real solution to the dead-end road length deficiency and staff continues to support a variance from this standard. Based on the revised plans, staff drafted an approval resolution for Council consideration. The Council should review the revised plat and make a motion to approve the application. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Council should make a motion to adopt Resolution 7559 granting preliminary plat approval for the plat of Idyllvale Shores. Exhibits A. Resolution 7559 Pre Plat B. Pre Plat (colored) C. Aerial Photos D. PC Minutes E. 120 Day Extension F. Public Comments G. Revised Plans 247 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7559 A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR THE PLAT OF IDYLLVALE SHORES FILE NO. LA24-000059 WHEREAS, Blue Pencil Collective, LLC, (hereinafter the "Developer") on behalf of the owners Bradley Pass and Gabriel Pass, (hereinafter the "Owners") of the following properties: 215 North Arm Lane, and PIDs 06-117-23-24-0002 and 06-117-23-23-0021 legally described within Exhibit A (hereinafter collectively the "Property"); WHEREAS on October 23, 2024, the Developer applied for Preliminary Plat approval to subdivide the Property into six (6) buildable lots and a private road outlot; and WHEREAS, on November 18, 2024 and February 18, 2025, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held public hearings, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were allowed to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on November 18, 2024, the Planning Commission tabled the application providing guidance to the developer regarding changes; and WHEREAS, on February 18, 2025, the Planning Commission reviewed the revised preliminary plat, although the Developer made the directed revisions, the proposed road did not meet the engineering standards. Based on the substandard roadway, the Commission recommended denial of the application as revised; and WHEREAS, on March 41", the Developer submitted revised plans reflecting a new road layout. The City's engineer reviewed and approved the changes to the revised roadway; and WHEREAS, on March 10, 2025, the City Council reviewed the revised application, the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff, and made the following findings: FINDINGS OF FACT: Al. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #LA24-000059. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above - mentioned meetings, and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 248 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7559 A2. The Property is guided in the 2020-2040 Community Management Plan for single-family residential use, specified as Rural Residential which allows 1 unit per 2 acres. A3. The Property is located in the LR-1A One Family Lakeshore Residential, and RR-1 B One Family Rural Residential Zoning Districts, each of which require a minimum of 2.0 acres and 200 feet of width. A4. The Property contains 25.32 gross acres in area. A5. The proposal would create five (5) buildable lots. A6. The Property is not located within the MUSA and will be served by private on -site septic systems and private water supply wells. A7. The Property is within the Stormwater Quality Overlay District which restricts overall hardcover. Following Final Plat approval, the methodology outlined within City Code Section 78-1701 will be applied to assign each property to the appropriate protection tier. A8. The Developer has prepared grading plans to manage stormwater on -site without negatively impacting adjacent parcels. A9. The Developer has proposed a master grading plan that includes the establishment of building pads on each of the lots to establish a new engineered grade for building height determination. A10. All of the new lots conform to City standards. The development of the vacant lots will be required to meet all zoning standards. A11. The existing public road, North Arm Lane, provides access to the Property. North Arm Lane will be extended as part of the proposed plat. The existing roadway is substandard and is scheduled to be improved to meet city standards. Al2. The new public road is proposed to extend 600 feet beyond the northerly extent of the existing North Arm Lane off of North Arm Drive. This configuration results in a total road length of approximately 1,500 feet. City Code Section 82-281 limits dead-end roads to 1,000 linear feet maximum, requiring a variance. Staff supports the road length variance as there does not appear to be a viable alternate access that would conform. A13. As a prerequisite to Final Plat approval, the City requires a proportionate share of the land being developed to be conveyed to the City or dedicated to the public, for use as parks, playgrounds, trails, or open space. For residentially zoned land, a dedication of 0.10 acres 249 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7559 per additional residential household being developed is required. In instances where a cash contribution is to be made by the developer, in place of a conveyance or dedication of land, the cash contribution shall be equivalent to the fair market value of the land to be dedicated. The determination of the fair market value of the undeveloped land by the city assessor, city council, or designated appraisers shall be determined at the time of final approval. Where the anticipated park needs are greater than the number of acres to be developed, the city establishes a maximum park dedication fee. For areas of residential density 3 units per acre or less, a cap of 4 percent of the predeveloped value is applied. The 2020-2040 Comprehensive Plan does not specify the need for a neighborhood park or trail at this location. A park dedication of land instead would be appropriate according to the City Ordinance. A14. The Developer has submitted a Conservation Design Master Plan (CDMP) prepared by Civil Methods which inventoried and described the environmental features of the site, defining what natural values of the site should be preserved or enhanced and how that should occur. According to the CDMP, this property is partially located within a greenway corridor, and contains areas of maple -basswood and oak forests with the potential to contain rare species. The developer did not survey the rare species but rather ensured that proper protective measures would be taken if rare species were encountered during development. According to the CDMP report, the plans prioritize the preservation of the existing woodland and wetland areas and the maintenance of the existing natural ecological connections. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants Preliminary Plat Approval allowing the Developer to proceed with a final subdivision of the Property into 5 building lots and dedication of a public road extension. The preliminary plat (attached as Exhibit B) together with the stormwater grading plan will establish building pad elevations, drainage swales, and stormwater basins. Preliminary Plat approval is subject to the following conditions: B1. Approval is subject to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (hereinafter the "MCWD") approval and permits as required. Final Plat approval shall not be granted until the Developer has provided evidence that all required MCWD permits have been obtained. B2. Approval is subject to right-of-way dedication. 250 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7559 B3. The Developer shall address all outstanding engineering comments and/or conditions provided by the City Engineer with the Final Plat development plan submittal. B4. The development shall adhere to the conditions within the Civil Methods Conservation Design Master Plan. B5. The erosion control plan shall adhere to "Best Management Practices for Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas" and to the approved SWPPP. All erosion controls as required by the City and the MCWD shall be in place before commencing grading and excavation on the site. All such erosion control measures shall be maintained in working order until the site is vegetated and stabilized. B6. The construction limits shall be clearly marked with adequate fencing to prevent any construction damage or disturbance of any trees and vegetation outside of the construction limits area. The Developer shall identify trees to be preserved on site, mark them on a site plan, and take extraordinary measures such as fencing, signage, etc. to ensure they are not disturbed. B7. Upon evidence of resettlement history, the Developer shall cease all activity and contact the City and the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) before proceeding. B8. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. B9. Easements Required. 1. Drainage and Utility Easements shall be dedicated to the public on the final plat 10' along all exterior property lines, and 5' on either side of interior property lines, except such easements shall be increased to accommodate drainage where required, subject to City staff approval. 2. A Drainage and Utility easement shall be dedicated to the public on the plat over stormwater pond areas, drainageways, and stormwater facilities. 3. A Drainage Easement shall be granted over wetlands and wetland buffers on the Property. B10. Development Fees: a. Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee: The property will be subject to the 2025 Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee of $8,060.00 per new lot. Three new lots are proposed, therefore $8,060 x 4 = $32,240.00. b. Park Dedication Fee: The subdivision is subject to the standard Park Dedication Fee requirement. The Park Dedication Fee is outlined in the City's current 2025 Fee 251 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7559 Schedule and applied to each newly created lot on a per lot basis. Park dedication fees are based on Hennepin County's assessment of the predeveloped land value. Based on the 2024 Fee Schedule, the Park Dedication Fee will be due for 4 new lots, in the amount of $ 15,431.95. B11. Plans and Specifications. The following plans and specifications shall be submitted for review and approval by the City and other appropriate jurisdictions before Final Plat approval, to ensure that the proposed plat will accomplish the intended purposes: 1. Final grading, drainage, and erosion control plan showing existing and proposed contours, anticipated building locations, elevations, stormwater facilities and calculations, public road, utilities and erosion control measures to be used during construction. 2. Final Landscape Plan which shall include planting plans with tree calculations. 3. Final Stormwater Management Plan. 4. Final stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP). 5. Sufficient detail to meet the recommendations of the City Engineer. B12. Council approval is based on the entire record and the above Findings. Any amendments to the plans that are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. This approval does not limit the City from revising or amending these conditions as the review process continues. 1313. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Owners, but are permissive only and must be exercised by filing a Final Plat application within one year of the date of Council approval, or the preliminary plat approvals will expire on that date. FINAL SUBMITTALS: The Developer shall complete all requirements for Final Plat Approval and all final submittals must be submitted to the Planning Department at least four (4) weeks before the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month. These submittals are as follows: C1. Record Plat Drawings. Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies (one copy for the City's records and one for filing with Hennepin County) and one (1) copy reduced to 1" = 200'. A digital copy is also required. Drawing to include: a. Lot lines platted per preliminary plat survey/drawing by Civil Methods Inc., dated 03/04/2025 attached hereto as Exhibit B, except as modified herein. 252 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7559 b. Dedication of "Drainage and Utility Easements" 10' along exterior property lines, 5' along the interior property lines, and over the stormwater pond, ditches, and facilities. c. Dedication of "Drainage Easements" over the wetlands, wetland buffers, and drainageways. d. Name of the plat. C2. Financial Guarantee. The Development Agreement shall include a financial guarantee by the Developer to ensure the completion of site improvements. The Developer shall provide Itemized construction estimates for all development improvements. The City Engineer shall review the estimate of improvement costs, including but not limited to storm sewers, landscaping, grading, erosion control, utilities, roads, and stormwater management facility construction, and the Developer shall provide a financial guarantee in an amount equal to 125% of the improvement costs to the City. C3. Legal documents required: a. Title opinion addressed to the City or a title insurance policy in favor of the City. All owners, mortgage holders, or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. b. The Developer must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the Property. c. The City Engineer shall establish the amount to be provided in the Letter of Credit. d. Signed Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit for construction of improvements. e. Signed Covenant to Protect Drainfield Sites. C4. Plat approval fees to be paid: Total due: $50,971.95 a. Final Plat fee: $800.00. b. Park Dedication Fee: $15,431.95 c. Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee: $32,240.00. d. Final Plat Application Escrow: $2,500.00 253 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL No. 7559 C5.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. C6.According to City Code Section 82-116, this Preliminary Plat approval shall be effective for one year, until March 10, 2026. Failure to file a complete final plat application within this period shall be construed as a formal withdrawal of the proposed plat and the terms and conditions of this resolution shall be null and void. ATTEST: ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 10th day of March, 2025. CITY OF ORONO: Christine Lusian, City Clerk Bob Tunheim, Mayor 254 Resolution 7559 Exhibit A LA24-000059 Existing Legal Descriptions: All that part of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 6, Township 117 North, Range 23, West of the 5th Principal Meridian, bounded by a line described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 6; thence South along the West line of said East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 to a point distant 854.5 feet North of the Southwest corner of said East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4; thence East parallel with the South line of said East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4, a distance of 280 feet; thence South parallel with the West line of said East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 to the South line of said East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4; thence East along the South line of said East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4, a distance of 33 feet; thence North parallel with the West line of said East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4, a distance of 854.5 feet; thence East parallel with the South line of said East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 to a point distant 22 rods East of the West line of said East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4; thence North parallel with the West line of said East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 to the South line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence West along said South line to the point of beginning. ALSO, All that part of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 6, Township 117, Range 23, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section thence West along the North line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 6 to a point distant 22 rods East of the Northwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 6; thence South and parallel with the West line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 6 to a point distant 854.5 feet North of the South line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 6; thence East to a point on the East line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 6 distant 854.5 feet North of the Southeast corner of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 6; thence North along said East line to the point of beginning. ALSO, That part of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 6, Township 117, Range 23, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence West along the South line of said Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 a distance of 1020.6 feet to the point of beginning of "Line A"; thence North parallel with the West line of said Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 a distance of 854.5 feet to the point of beginning of the property being described, and said "Line A" there ending; thence East parallel with said South line a distance of 290 feet; thence South parallel with the West line of said Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 a distance of 75 feet; thence West parallel with said South line a distance of 290 feet to said "Line A"; thence North along said "Line A" to the point of beginning. EXCEPT the right of way of North Arm Lane, as dedicated as public highway, per Document No. 7835812. AND Outlot B, IDYLLVALE FARM, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 255 99Z I ----------t Jo` 3 976 J ORTH AR ggemg � s I a /� 92 Or I WNo �o r `z r = D Nr n z N O = � p o m K (1) z T A \\ \\ \ Jill l i �Inlllrn�un///// "\vvu s i�Lu1 loranIIII/�/�—J IIlmlll�///' oo o II I I I IIIIIII I III III/ // I �I I I I I\ I\ 1 1077 An anga - G�55mm .. G6GlS�E 15Z oll I II III I Z03 6N nwo II ���� IIII il/ ���v�v.�,,,Ilzll ��� v v �Il��rrl�i/iiiljl�ll���I—=_ �•Iv � UP. T/ Fi J!@j'i'YorA 3 JE •�'. \ � 'F \ \ �a<,P� \ 4085'�-2JI.59'1 1I \ .-304.2J 0 /*- Ol \ �l9 27' -100J I I, I^ rl.- H, \ I v v I I n� •.\ 1 \1 I \ \ s \ r l H. --- L:•:•YL:1I I AAV:�I JI �°2O1 �I I v I be°g88884 � V I � � I : N: I• I � II I i'� 1 A;• )'iBO��°�°�� � IA AVjA A V A 0$=°8�0� �w I Tv � �-� A o8°°a � - I A aim °U'T'�-;j..w •{,f �a` �-/� \� a ~i .1 °'I '�'I � ��' �q° °= oo `\ 1 I y '�"ws Ppo°o° &0°0� I 1 \ \o �., •,:,_. 9 z .. 1\I t �i I I s�. 'I '�296.as 864 �� t%•�ti� - I N Igl I 1 I 1 ���°9 �I \ \ �o \ 4'a I �'•.�.•: ..1s3n \ �.. .,J1 la 10 ,• •L'm I �: �5 ' .I.'..'.J� TT-Ir 71 qa? •� I \ \ .'1' ;M ••• I 236.63' \ \ \ \21 J.10' \ °�� � I I .�:•''vv :a:> I sv'ten vAv v � � ��\ vv v �o I 11 I 11 ° v v v A v y I I v �g'------'- � � � I �r� vea •� �:�a,�>A\\ A'll. v ` � � � w �V v\\ vv\ V A\ \I 1 II I A v ,� -- �— r ^' .•• '$.'�.vAP ��` � \ v ` vA vvv v v1 v 1v v v \ �_- --950 18 o� P _ 960 —— g — -- E � m — _ �_ _____ --- ' e�°°°� �� Vv �:': •:`v vvA -----' a 8\I \ 7 980 A z.0 - �— — fB z III I I ,� — —� A`"a` v.•.' � I v \ '�� v vvu IIII /rl �7/ Iv\'o'.�� ��`V A VAIII IIII III �a I/l//r/ A A oo V A A IIIIIIII IIII /ll/rr r/�/�/ ` A 0�\\ �1 m r z D N � £a r D i,l,ll m MOE0'' i m l i Z 8 o� CA cn 85Z 3 NNE A o o r- D 'K m m z lA O = A Q o m K N z z 6 1 F I �_���__�\ __ •�,c�y, t�31B '.____ \a 'ter _________________j•, -------- v A V �,•. �- -- -- rx. 1 -' I 1 a v Zvi II I ( �.2:•:+. � . y <6' vvv: �''. ' '.. ' V8°° tea'° I I (W8YHILON) e _ R " � �) .:• •::�,:9 �� it i l i � / ��;; J / , � �. 7•:'• � ' - _ - _ A \ >t `_ -- �:�: mil• f. o�// / s°-!� �' '.�.: ��_ 1 • .1' — — 5! " lam' � I _ ti __ _- - w�''r I.' �:::-yam...• ..� ------ \ v v'v v V v v v vv------- _ �------------ '950- \\� _-_ 4__-_-\ - ---J �--_ --- \� - -- �\`\_ \ \ — 011 11 (� �/ 11 ri /ii/i�/ii %= = �'=--- \� \ `\ II \ \\� lull �i I• �iij '%'�' \011111 IIIi�° / -� ��V I III�II IIII N x 4 01-HO C� —-----------� 1 v 11 I I (IIII u,i, 0 O 75 U 7 0 Ln O co L U N O c� U r� U �o @ 0 o LL IL / \ \ \ / / o / / \ — / 03 / / I I I \ \ \ \ // // III I I III 1 \ 9�0 \ \ /lll� I I I 1 \ \ 0 //^ 1 / \\\�o\\\o \\ oo\\ \ o� \\ .\\\\90`� \\ °\��\\ ° \ \ j- IJ� ��=363.01'� \� --�--- / /// �/ `�o I I IIIII I I I \ \\ \\—_— '`� /� /�I I I \ / I 1 \ I I I III \�\ \\ \\ \ \\ IN, � / / / / / • • \ 2Q \ \ \o0 f 1 o 711 All °� Q 04 +f+ •� \ \ —\ \\\ \\\\ \— /�%ice Ill//l \ 1 1 \ I _� / �- --IN, \ * * \ \980 \ \ \\ \ \ •• rn \ / \ \ \ \ \\-----///�/ • \ I \ \ \ — /// II \ \ \\ \\80 / I I I I I I I l \ l ,• •; goo \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \_ I I I I / / I I I 1 ► \ •*i' \ 00 I,I II\I .�\ \\\ \\\ +�'++'+•f,.•��;++l•` \\��o \\(mo°s\pp.�ppopzz /\\ o /pAb- 00000000o�6_000-0( _ — — — — 900000 oI0po�p°o �oo"papdoppoopoogoo oa°0006op�o �o O _� -_-98 o\ 0/0, / o°00°0°O f+ff•f••00960 „1I /J—- 1 — \ \ - \\\ \ IN, \ vvv rn� �I I \\ // / —_ J_ \�\_%, <\ \---- / I \ \ \ \ \ o \ \ I • • • + vvvvvv I __ \ \\ \ \ �• • \ + vvvvvv 1 1 \ / / / \� \ \ `S0, \\\ \ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ 980 I\ \ \ `*•�•*•� ,*, vvvv of I I �� �/ / / _` \ \ \\\\ \\\ \ \---------I-do \ \ \ 100 \ \ 217.10' \ \ \ \ 235.63 I I I II . ++\+- - f•'fs�\ f+f�f+ • • — — — — / / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ o — — _0 L —\\ 9o9oI 8-\\\ \ Cw \,--O— o °\dop\ �\\\ \\\�Ii \c\9 O \\ i\�\ I 1\\\ \ \ \ \ IIyII\\\ °r'°gI 0• � •�+ �•• •+ h••'••_\• •'• *• f•f\ ,/ •/I /'V •i-`ff�Y� III IIII II /fr.I/ �••,. (•'� V••+'7'••+♦•'� ++�••./•°�f��t fff�•af.- rI III .� • • • •f * •f • •er•�••/ •\ N .944 • .•• /4••/ • •••+/ ••!• •/••• ••1/••+ //•+'• ••+� '•/ •'�••*•I f••/�*' f9•*s/ f•// ••�F�/!/ ••�/ // //•• / / /•Y/ +/ / /++/�' /*1 •O '••/�y/ •+ +I•,\--)f /— +\•f%II � / —•*•f\;i+ .'s _*— *,,\. _ �— •\ ' • *\'�'_ �\ 0 / c, •t 5••••/� ••�•••• ••• I I ITI •t298.46s.— ----�o���� 04 m�OpO�\� 8.64, o 0 01 L••• • • • • • • + • \ 1_ -*••s �\p••��,\\��\••\ `QQ O O 0O4 +1M ` -' DO0 _ ••••p�Ot0 0VO 2•O ✓ R\ \ O0O f3+'� 9 �UO— — — =� 7 pi0�°O\ tt\\I o_0°O0 0 o0°/ 0pO °. f i `. N I rn • • L� O ff•••'/' 0 •N+ f,O) °p°p • 0O 0 oO 0O °ow o ipCp,••• •• :'o \\ v v vv o°00� �o 940 *vvv vOoo' \Oo \oodpb°o°o o OOpoOJ0,op'oO Qb �0o•+\++ vv• -A- `pvvvvvv "' - � 0 0 dO g Opo�ooOoO \ \��oOp°o7p%p VVV V O�O lJg00opOpOok **++ • .-+•+1 N vvvvvvvvvv17 9°o 0 0 0po\ -Sr y'+f• *O6bf* °opoo�oO 6,�boo5� L<Ao b�o 0CRE + + + +�o0,d/ + �Xvvvvv \\\ \2 �vvvvv 17 41.61V t v V iD 87171 SQ vvv vv I - Ov \-\— �- _ I I Irri }+f•f•�f •+f+*I. '.+'ma +• 00 �\ f+++:+ - - - - - ++++-,0 CpWETL% ND 2c, 99 SQ F \—O 9cv ��19 CRES I `° • • s+ • II \II \(( \ \ �\�I/� \ /\/ I // /�/\/ // /g\\ N I�3:g�l''3'*�+P Op0 o •.+`+o ++ 5 +++0 ++'1•�`�+e-+'; •�1'• ' +•j I� L \ I \ � \ C9 \ O 0 O / f+f tf 332428 SQ FT +f++ +f / fit • + +f f+ \ I No°f oQp� 1 I / 7.63 ACRES + + r f+Al + + + + \ \ \ 0�g\.'o*qqqoo'Opo-pp*I\960 IA- ++\ + + ++ + + •+++f•4f+\ /• — -+�. /+!�++1*+ Il►++ •+•++ ++ •+• + • 6of O Q ,,,N ++ '+'+'+'\''4'+i+++ .S..X�CA p I 1 \ \ \ '+'+'+'+\ ( +*+ +*+ *X 70 1 — ROW \ \ ° I / 133.72= 10.07_ 1oL6-�ODpo0p0o�\0'+ff++f+�� oa0 O pp +f+. c0 1.11 ACRES O °f + 039 . • �•ff\++�ff+•+ff+•+*f•+ I1 +•++ \O % o ooOo ff ++•+ff+ •+ #+•ff+ +•+ + ++ + \1 1 A ....... • • • • I � moo— —T — ,1 1 \ 304.27/ 271.59' 150.03'/ O \ \ \ \ + + + + + + + + + + + -40.85 " o°o°° \ •�� +�' . + :'. '— — — —731 .81'+ �•'f *•+NVI — — — — — t e: w ;�•: � I oxs? v Iri ,reN rp 022 o I Li CIVIL METHODS, INC. P.O. Box 28038 St. Paul, MN 55128 o:763.210.5713 I www.civiImethods.com •-x�• \ 0) 8.7 IN, // 1/ l l l i/ I I I Q III I 1 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE: 03-04-2025 KENT E. BRANDER LAC. No.: 44578 DESIGNED: KEB DRAWN: KEB CHECKED: DMP 10-281.22"-' V 944J — g1 vv 1 DATE / REVISION: 01-06-2025 Permit Submittal Set. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 01-18-2025 Adjusted Lot Lines per Clty Comments. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 03-04-2025 Added Cul-de-sac at Entry Turn Per City Comments. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 1 1 \ I \ \ 9 \ \ \ L J PROJECT: IDYLLVALE SHORES PROD. LOCATION: 215 NORTH ARM LN, ORONO, MN 55364 PROJ.OWNER: BRADLEY J PASS 0 80 160 Feet SITE DATA: BENCHMARK SEE SURVEY DOCUMENTATION LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE — — — SETBACK — — — — — EASEMENT LOT WIDTH MEASUREMENT WETLAND BOUNDARY WETLAND BUFFER BOUNDARY CONTOUR _ WETLAND WETLAND BUFFER SEPTIC AREA vvvv STORMWATER MANAGEMENT vvvvv BASIN ® SLOPES >30% TOTAL PROPERTY AREA: ±25.35 AC EXISTING HARD SURFACE: t0.15 AC PROPOSED HARD SURFACE: t1.87 AC PROPOSED HARD SURFACE %: 7.4% ZONING: LR-1 A & RR-1 B DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (SAME FOR BOTH ZONES) LOT AREA (MIN): 2.0 AC LOT WIDTH (MIN): 200 FT HEIGHT (MAX): 30 FT SETBACKS (SAME FOR BOTH ZONES): SETBACK VALUES IN FEET STREET/ FRONT INTERIOR SIDE SIDE STREET REAR/ STREET PRINCIPAL BLDG 50 30 30 50 ACCESSORY BLDG 50 15 30 15 OVERSIZE ACC. BLDG. 50 30 30 50 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES 25 15 15 15 SITE CONDITIONS: WOODED; SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT: RURAL AND LAKESHORE RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED USE: RURAL RESIDENTIAL Know what's below Call before you dig. PRELIMINARY PLAT - OVERALL SHEET NO: S102 259 lip *AL I Pt L; � 4 RPF LR 1 _y ; M1 Jr,W."% �Z dL or Qpw .■ _ •• � �� �` � � '� � • 1. r - R' '- f � r L L L JML PF -1 dr MOT *' 4. T s� �Als AlhdLZ _ Vertical < Fri Aug 30 2024 ,e N +"! G, 260 y• ' y }' '+ '�, y '+ ra 4iy1F .- ,,,�_ - - •• r T y r+ - I ; T Y { n y _ 4 ' J ti y� �1 Y bo W. "- { 4 •' .} .� -•' * M1 1 r aft I . �p 0 4L 49. bi td % , f y - * •• l �. Ir � A. _ y T it'd .ti ] r f.. _ tir •{ go y }• '' • - �. � yam. - •{ � - � - � �� '� * � �` _ � 1 ' Ir A. F �r;j W A, 41 10 71 V. rd r � { ' �F � � y 'y F• ' 'Cr,.+ Fpr 5 f Yam~ , Y1w .la J. ' a # a 'fM1'rT' .4 % r �6 Ilk , dr Al TL 16, - l - S _ - T• •44L7' Tw Y L :s 'Y N& - - • - .' M1 •' ' 1. Rh Panorama < Fri May 3 202 261 0 Survey Area (25 ac.)TrEw .- ! ., Wetland Boundary — Waterbody Channel Transect LiDAR (2' contours).. . Figure 5 s ... Sources: color Hennepin 6 in, 2021, MnGeo, M N Department of Natural Resources, Delineated Aquatic Resources US Census Bureau, Date: 6/10/2024 Brad &Carol Pass o zoo 400 215 North Arm Lane and PINs 0611723240002 & 0611723230021 Feet Orono, MN 26; Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 18, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 turnaround for the fire department and the timeline for developing the project in its multiple stages. They indicated they were generally in favor of the application but felt more information is needed. Kirchner moved, Prchal seconded, to deny LA24-000054, 430 Old Crystal Bay Road North, Conditional Use Permit. VOTE: Ayes: 3, Nays 4 (Ressler, Brandabur, Bollis and Jarnot). MOTION FAILED. Ressler moved, Bollis seconded, to table LA24-000054, 430 Old Crystal d North, Conditional Use Permit. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays 1 (McCutcheon). 6.2 LA24-000059, BLUE PENCIL COLLECTIVE O/B/O FLE S, 215 NORTH ARM LANE, PRELIMINARY PLAT: "ID ALE S ", PUBLIC HEARING, REVIEW #2 The Planning Commission is requested to review the Sta , rec ' resentation�d discuss and take action on the proposed revised preliminary plat consis f forming lots rather than the original six. The Planning Commission discussed the ite question1f and the applicant, Kasey Johnson of Blue Pencil Collective. mombi Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 7:27 Mary Larson, 366 North Arm if the oad serving the area would be wide enough as two cars are not able to pas Mike Demeuse, 350 No Lan he want push back on the idea that exceptions should be made to allow this develo o ce ith negative impacts on the neighboring residents. Mandy Little h Ar e, said their property would be the one that would have a cul-de-sac all along i of s She quoted from the 2040 comprehensive plan regarding the lo on impact deverural residents. Randall 100 Bays i il, said he had a number of questions but added he has concerns about lot 4 in the plat s of ele s and run-off into the wetland. He said it seemed like a lot of pavement to get to the to Melissa DerneullWorth Arm Lane, asked if the commissioners had been out and looked at the property as she w them to understand how much is wetland and how much has the capacity to be developed. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 7:39 p.m. Bollis explained the wetlands are controlled by the watershed district and approval would be contingent upon their approval. Page 2 of 8 263 Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 18, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Commissioners said they were concerned about the turning radius, length of the new road, and the density of the plat, given the wetlands so close to the lake, although the lots are conforming. They said they could anticipate future owners of the lots coming back for variances. It was noted property owners have the right to develop their property. McCutcheon moved, Prchal seconded, to deny LA24--000059, 215 North Preliminary Plat: "Idyllvale Shores", as applied. VOTE: Ayes: 5, Nays 2 Kirchner). Chair Bollis recessed the meeting at 8:30 p.m. The meeting was 6.3 LA24-000065, HARTMAN COMPANIES, 980 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The Planning Commission is requested to review the approve a request for a conditional use permit for a n The Planning Commission discussed the item Hartman Companies, was present. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 8:41 There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the Commissioners said Kirchner moved, Conditional Us" C:x� The deny the re next to Woo lines for farm applicant's pr discuss and 'staff. The applicant, Seth Eggert, the conditional use permit. as applied, 980 Heritage Lane, 4 THOMSON, 430 EAST LONG LAKE ROAD, & VARIANCES quested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and Fnal use permit to keep up to 30 pigeons on the property. The property is developed natural area, but is deficient in lot size and set back from lot ffoted pigeons are not specifically called out in the ordinances, but the is consistent with farm animals. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff and the applicant, Dean and Susan Thomson, 685 Old Long Lake Road, the owners of 430 East Long Lake Road which, is a rental property. They said the pigeons are not named as farm animals and would be intended to be pets and a hobby and not for consumption. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 8:57 p.m. Page 3 of 8 264 Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Monday, November 18, 2024, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and approve hardcover, fencing and parking lot setback variances and site plan review to establish a new parking lot at an existing marina business. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff and the applicant, Travis Anderson, 3260 North Shore Drive. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:19 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:19 p.m. Commissioners asked about safety and said it seemed like a sensible approach and made the parking conforming with the road. Erickson moved, Schultze seconded, to approve LA24-000050,1449 Shoreline Drive, Variance and Commercial Site Plan Review. VOTE: Ayes: 4, Nays 0. 5.3. LA24-000058, TIM BROWN, PHI DECKS, 975 WILDHURST TRAIL, VARIANCES The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and approve variances to increase the upper deck and enclose the lower deck. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff. The applicant was present. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:31 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:31 p.m. Commissioners cited the small buildable area as supporting practical difficulty and noted the reduction of hardcover planned. Ressler moved, Schultze seconded, to approve LA24-000, variances. VOTE: Ayes: 4, Nays 0. 5.4 LA24--000059, BLUE PENCIL COLLECTIVE/KELSEY JOHNSON (DEVELOPER) O/B/O BRADLEY PASS, 215 NORTH ARM LANE (INCL. PIDS 06-117-23-24-0002 AND 06-117- 23-23-0021), PRELIMINARYPLAT: IDYLLVALE SHORES The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and table the preliminary plat to allow time for updating it to meet the required lot areas and other missing or ambiguous information and to reconfigure lot five to meet the City standards along with other findings, such as lot 6 not conforming as an outlot for lake access for the development. Page 2 of 6 265 Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Monday, November 18, 2024, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 McCutcheon arrived at 6:41 p.m. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff and the applicant, Gabriel Pass, Minneapolis, the brother of Bradley Pass, both sons of Carol Pass, the recently deceased owner. He said it was important to their mother and the family to develop the land in as way that respects the wetland and conservation. Kelsey Johnson, Blue Pencil Collective of White Bear Lake, said they were prepared to make the necessary adjustments to meet the requirements of the City and added they have no plans to provide lake access for lot 6. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:55 p.m. Mandy Little, 4620 North Arm Drive, said it was their understanding when they moved in that the land would be left natural and that they would be the neighbors most impacted by the development. Tim Pratt, 185 Bayside Trail, questioned the designation of a City street there and pointed out the water flow. Stephanie Burns, 370 North Arm Lane, said they have a quiet neighborhood with small children and could not see two long cul-de-sacs with additional houses off their narrow street. Jeff Toole, no address given, said the neighborhood is not as dense as the proposal to put five homes into 10 acres. Mark Larson, 366 North Arm Lane, said they have been there for 40 years and live in the original farmhouse and they and other neighbors have concerns about homes being shoe -horned next to theirs. Mike Demeuse, 350 North Arm Lane, asked if there would be another public hearing after the proposed plat is redesigned and said it doesn't seem like the goal is preservation with the number of houses proposed and a long hardcover drive serving one house. Brian Hedeen, 360 North Arm Lane, also said their road is too narrow for two cars to meet and he doesn't know how that would work for construction and life after that with increased traffic. Melissa Demeuse, 350 North Arm Lane, said she is concerned about the narrow road and traffic due to another neighborhood being there with more residents and possible hired services like landscapers. Gabriel Pass, 2536 181}i Ave. said by not developing the land his family has been providing a wilderness to the neighborhood and paying taxes on it and they don't have an obligation to do that in perpetuity. He said the property would be sold and developed eventually, possibly by other persons less interested in working with the City and the neighbors. M. Larson, 366 North Arm Lane, also pointed out the narrow lane all the neighbors live on and asked if there would be a plan to take land from them to widen the lane. She said some of the homes are right on the lane. Page 3 of 6 266 Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Monday, November 18, 2024, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Philip Little, 4620 North Arm Lane, asked that Blue Point eliminate the buffer zone of two-inch trees which would take too long to grow to be large enough, and said if they had talked to the neighbors they could have avoided some issues. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 7:16 p.m. Commissioners asked if North Arm Lane is a City street maintained by the City and also asked about the Lot 6 outlot and if a condition could be set that it could not be used for lake access. Commissioners said the City is generally not interested in approving non -conforming lots like lot five but that the owners have a right to develop within the code. However the land is a wetland, they said, and it should be studied to make sure the land would even have buildable lots and there should be oversight from the Lake Minnehaha Creek Watershed. Rules for City Streets and cul-de-sacs have changed since the narrow lane was constructed. It was pointed out that the additional road and cul-de-sacs would assist the City in servicing North Arm. Ressler moved, McCutcheon seconded, to table LA24--000059 and continue the public hearing, 215 North Arm Lane (incl. PIDs 06-117-23-24-0002 and 06-117-23-23-0021), Preliminary Plat: Idyllvale Shores. VOTE: Ayes: 5, Nays 0. Chair Bollis recessed the meeting at 7:45 p.m. The meeting was reconvened after a short break. 5.5 LA24-000060, TVL STUDIOS, 755 TONKAWA RD, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR RETAININGWALLS The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and approve the conditional use permit for replacement of a deck and retaining wall on the lakeshore. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff and the applicant, Travis Van Liere, TVL Studio, Minneapolis, the architect for the project. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 7:50 p.m. There were no public comments Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 7:50 p.m. Commissioners said it was a good plan respecting the historical nature of the property and one that reduces the footprint, hardcover, and height of the retaining walls. McCutcheon moved, Ressler seconded, to approve LA24-000060„ 755 Tonkawa Rd, Conditional Use Permit for RetainingWalls. VOTE: Ayes: 5, Nays 0. 5.6. LA24-000062, TEXT AMENDMENT: SECTIONS 78-1 AND 78-823 INDUSTRIAL USES Page 4of6 267 From: Kasey Johnson To: Melanie Curtis Cc: Regan Nix; Christy Davis Subject: Request for extension of the review timeline Date: Monday, January 20, 2025 6:37:14 AM Good Morning, Melanie, This email is a request to extend the Idyllvale Shores review timing by 60 days to May Sth. Please let me know if there is anything needed from our team for extension approval. We look forward to the Tuesday, February,18th planning commission meeting. Thank you, KASEY JOHNSON I CID CO-FOUNDER 0= BLUEPENCILCOLLECTIVE.COM (0)651-419-63671(M)612-201-3504 2150 3RD STREET, STE 5 WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110 268 From: Philip Bremer To: Melanie Curtis Subject: Fwd: Fw: Planning Commission Meeting Date: Friday, February 14, 2025 11:53:47 AM Attachments: Pavement Manaaement Plan 2014 (PDF).Ddf Resolution 7451. Seasonal Weight Restrictions 202402141445303410.Ddf Good morning Melanie and City Council I wanted to provide you with my thoughts about the development going in at the end of N Arm Lane. I have attached 2 documents that I pulled from the City's website. You can choose to exclude/include them if you wish. You are also welcome to include my email signature. Thank you Being a Realtor, I honestly believe in Property Rights of landowners. That is, a landowner has the right to do whatever they choose to do with their property as long as it doesn't infringe on the rights of other property owners or disenfranchise them due to loss in value, expenses, issues or problems. I live at 4700 N Arm Dr, Mound, MN 55364. My road will be used as the main route for construction personnel, vehicles, heavy equipment and material transportation. This additional wear and tear on N. Arm Dr and N. Arm Lane will shorten the lifespan of the asphalt that is already near the end of its useful life. When this happens, a City, Township or County would normally assess the property owners who have road frontage to help cover the expense to repair/replace the road. This brings the fight to my door. I am not in favor of any new city assessments that raise my taxes or the taxes of my neighbors! To understand the current condition of North Arm Drive and North Arm Lane, we need to know when these roads were constructed. This would provide useful information as to the site preparation, use of sub -base of materials, roadway construction and the asphalt paving. This information determines the life expectancy of the roadways. This begs to ask: Are we currently past the current life expectancy of these roads? What happened 8-9 years ago with the development of the Lakeview neighborhood? Wasn't North Arm Drive supposed to be repaved after its completion? Why did that not happen? Here's what I recommend. 269 I would like to encourage the city to consider hiring 2 road inspectors (a second opinion never hurts) to take several core samples of North Arm Drive and North Arm Lane. This would provide a BASE-LIINE of valuable information about the road's current condition/quality for future maintenance and repair purposes. Then, once the construction is completed, have the roads inspected again, to determine what, if any, damage has been done to these road ways. If the roadways haven't been harmed in any way, due to construction efforts, at least we will know. However, if the roadways were damaged or further limited the remaining life of the roadway, the Developers or property owner(s) should compensate the city accordingly. Found on the City's website, I have attached a copy of the Pavement Management Plan from the City of Orono. This was adopted nearly 10 years ago on Oct 27th, 2014. In addition Resolution 7451, city of Orono, states the City council limits N. Arm Drive and N. Arm Lane to a 4 ton per axle weight limit during Spring load restrictions. I would like to see core samples proving the construction of N. Arm Lane and N. Arm Drive can support 4 tons per axle. Please note, I highly doubt N. Arm Lane was constructed to withstand these loads when the residential traffic only supported a few households. To recap, I'm in favor of the landowner moving forward as he wishes. However, I do not want this to financially impact myself or my neighbors because the cityof Orono has overlooked the possible impact the construction has further degraded these roadways. Say Hello! 952-250-9313 phiIipaa minnesotan.com www.minnesotan.com Realtor Minnesotan Team 270 March 6, 2025 TO: Mayor Bob Tunheim Council MemberAlisa Benson Council Member Claire Berrett Council Member Steve Persian Council Member Jacqueline Ricks FROM: Phil and Mandy Little 4620 North Arm Drive RE: Pass Property 215 North Arm Lane We continue to have more and more concerns about this development. At the Planning Commission meetings in November and February several of Commission members spoke about their concerns with this wetland and protecting the lake from the consequences of this development, particularly lot 4 and 5. 1 would encourage you to view the February meeting when the Commissioners are talking to each other about their concerns. I would also invite you to contact any of the 12 property owners that abut this property to visit the site. Throughout this process we have asked staff who represents the residents that are impacted by this development — taking down 400+ trees, putting roads in our backyards, impact to an important wetland, etc? The answer has been no one. In looking at the job description of Council members I see two items of the job are to: 1. Be a liaison between Orono and members of the public 2. Protect the welfare of Orono and its residents We have repeatedly asked, with no concrete understanding of the Orono 2040 Comprehensive Plan that states "future rural developments will be guided so as to have minimal impact on the land and or existing rural neighbors.... Care will be exercised to ensure that no new development encroaches upon its neighbor's open space activities." Having a cul de sac road 60 feet from our back property line clearly encroaches on our open spaces. The trees being proposed will not keep us protected and are inadequate at best. This development will disturb the sensitive ecosystems and wetlands and has not enhanced open spaces, including wildlife corridors to maintain ecological connectivity. The local residents have also not been involved in the planning process to ensure all of our concerns are addressed. The problem with "shoehorning" a development into a wetland is that it is impossible to be 100% sure that covering all of the items that need to be covered for the Watershed to meet their rules for the developers application will guarantee not damage to this wetland. However we may never know all of the consequences until it is too late. Asking for forgiveness rather than permission doesn't work when we are talking about lifelong consequences to the health of Lake Minnetonka. 271 Commissioner McCutcheon was spot on when he said at the Feb. 18 meeting, "if this was a wetland in the middle of the woods ya, fine, but this is a wetland feet from Lake Minnetonka and all that water is going to be going down to the lake." Commissioner Prchal agreed with him. We would ask that this development not be approved. 272 From: RRN To: Melanie Curtis Subject: Idyllvale Shores Development Comments for 3/10 Council Meeting Date: Thursday, March 6, 2025 1:24:02 PM Melanie, this is for inclusion in the Council packet for the 3/10 Meeting regarding the subject development. Thank you. To: Orono City Council Members, I am writing to you in regards to the subject proposed development which I believe is on the council agenda for review and final approval on March 10. My name is Randall Nord and I am a resident along the NW border of Lot 4 in the proposed development. You are probably more aware of the details than I am, but the way I believe the February Planning Commission meeting ended was that the developer's representatives were sent back with out approval, for them to redesign the proposed curve on the east -west extension of North Arm Drive, and to await the final decision from the MCWD, after the developer submitted responses to all the MWCD's open issues. First let me state that in general, I am not opposed to the development. I am at 100 Bayside Trail and already have homes up on the hill behind me to the north (on my left), and to the east directly behind me. And, as such, the addition of another home behind mine on that hill to my right in Lot 4 is not an issue for me per se, as far as it being visible from my property. That's progress. What I am worried about though are two things: First, on Lot 4 (and to a lesser degree on Lot 5), the building pad for the home and driveway loop as shown on the site plan results in a very steep slope down to the wetland below and I am very concerned about runoff of fertilizer, from soil erosion, etc, etc, into the wetland. Second, I am concerned that to access the North Arm, both lots 4 and 5 will have to build raised boardwalks across long sections of wetland 2. I did speak with Abigail at the MCWD about these issues and she understands them, but said if the developers meet their requirements to avoid runoff, they will approve the plan. As for the long boardwalks needed to access the North Arm, she said there would be no approval given to do that at this time, and a separate permit request would be required later. She also said their approval would not allow an ATV or vehicle path to the lakeshore either. In summary, as I stated at the beginning of this email, I am not opposed to this development per se. However, I have some huge concerns over Lots 4/5 that place 2 homesites right in the middle of an old and rather undisturbed wetland, that could result in some serious environmental issues impacting the future of this wetland, and the movement patterns and food supplies of the wildlife and water fowl that live there. Basically, I feel these 2 lots are essentially unbuildable for all the reasons I laid out. The site plans for them are very creative and as some Planning Commissioners said, meet city guidelines for lot size, hard surfaces, septic mound spaces, etc. But, approving them simply because they meet these black and white specs does not take into consideration the impact on the wetland. Thank you for considering my concerns and I look forward to discussions regarding this development at the upcoming March 10 council meeting. Best Regards, Randall Nord 273 March 6, 2025 Addressed to Orono City Council: Mayor Bob Tunheim Council Member Alisa Benson Council Member Claire Berrett Council Member Steve Persian Council Member Jacqueline Ricks FROM: Michael and Melissa DeMeuse 350 N Arm Lane RE: Idyllvale Shores Subdivision Proposal at 215 North Arm Lane We wish to express our ongoing concerns regarding the Idyllvale Shores Subdivision and challenge the notion that exceptions should be made to maximize the development of this environmentally sensitive parcel in Orono. Our primary concern is the exception that's being made to the city standard limit for dead-end roads of 1,000 linear feet, which can encourage denser development. The current development plan proposes exceeding this limit by approximately 500 feet. The wetlands within the development drain into the channel on North Arm Bay, which is located approximately 200 feet south of the development site. Due to limited water circulation in the channel, the potential harm from pesticides, fertilizers, oils, and other chemicals released by these new households could be acutely felt. Denser housing will exacerbate this issue. Many homes along the channel have docks and utilize the lake, and the channel is an important breeding ground for several fish species in the spring. Seasonal plant growth in the channel is already overwhelming, making these concerns far from theoretical. Furthermore, the subdivision will significantly strain the safety and utility of North Arm Lane. The street is too narrow for two vehicles to pass without one driving on the grass or snow. This development will likely double the traffic, transforming this quiet residential street into a more heavily trafficked road. We have serious safety concerns, particularly for the small children who live on the street both during construction and post -development. While the city engineer's proposal to widen the street would alleviate traffic congestion, it would also undermine the residential character of the neighborhood, encourage faster driving, create unknown costs and sacrifices to safety. We are not opposed to development; rather, we are against overdevelopment driven by exceptions that create unreasonable negative impacts on both the neighborhood and the environment. The owner experience for those living in the surrounding Idyllvale Shores Subdivision will be drastically altered, affecting the enjoyment of their homes, yards, and privacy. This development fails to consider the needs of the community and is focused on maximizing the number of lots on this parcel of land. 274 We are frustrated that this process continues despite concerns raised by the community and the City Planning Committee. Some exceptions are being granted, while others are not being considered. During the February 18 Planning Committee meeting, certain members expressed that discomfort with the density of the development was irrelevant as long as the code was met, while simultaneously endorsing flexibility in exceeding the city standard for dead-end road length by approximately 50 percent. In closing, the developer and property owners of 215 North Arm Lane will not experience the lasting and profound effects on their homes and lives that this development will impose on the surrounding community. As residents of Orono, we urge our elected officials to consider the needs of their constituents and the protection of Lake Minnetonka, one of the community's most valuable assets, before advancing this development further. We respectfully request that the density of the development be limited. It is still possible to build multiple lots on this property without compromising the surrounding neighborhood or environment. We encourage the developer to submit alternative plans that better preserve the character of the area before any final decisions are made. 275 From: Melissa Kiolsina To: Melanie Curtis Subject: Comments for 215 N Arm Lane (Idyllvale Shores) from 350 N Arm Lane Date: Thursday, November 14, 2024 7:00:43 PM Hello Melanie, Below are the comments we'd like to formally submit to the City of Orono. Can you confirm that our comments will be included in the Orono Planning Commission packet for this coming meeting on Monday, November 18, 2024? Thank you, Melissa and Michael COMMENTS: As nearby residents of the proposed development at 215 N Arm Lane, we have serious concerns we want to share with Orono's Planning Commission. The area under discussion has abundant wetlands to support natural habitat for numerous native species. They thrive on this land because it's removed from dense traffic, noise pollution and human activity. To see it taken away due to a development is heartbreaking and frustrating, and we are against moving forward. People move to this area because of the cohabitation with nature and wildlife. We feel this development directly contradicts the values of the nearby community and the previous owners of the property who left it undeveloped. We and other neighbors have expressed time again that we are eager to preserve the state of the property through significant financial investment including purchasing the property for preservation. The current plans drastically change the property experiences for nearby residents with the addition of roads, cars and services traveling to and from the proposed properties. In addition to our concerns, we see an opportunity for the city to purchase this property to support community access to natural space between N Shore Drive W and West Branch Road. This community currently has no other public spaces that are accessible by pedistrations without having to cross busy and fast -driving roads. There are approximately 100 homes in this community that would benefit from this space while continuing to support its values of preservation and coexisting with wildlife. Lastly, we have fears about the natural resources of this lakeshore residential district being compromised by the proposed plan and that the quality of the stormwater runoff into the wetlands and Lake Minnetonka is endangered. We have reviewed the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District rules and regulations and have identified a number of concerns: 1. The wetland buffer rules either are not followed or cannot be verified to be followed. a. According to article XI, division 3 of the Orono Code, wetland buffer rules from the Minnehaha creek watershed district (MCWD) shall apply where established. The wetlands in the plan are classified as "preserve" according to the City of Orono Wetlands and Drainage Districts map, accessed November 11, 2024. The MCWD Wetland Protection Rule 5 effective April 29, 2024 has established buffer widths for wetlands based on wetland management classification, including those classified a "preserve". Such wetlands have a setback base width of 75 feet, with a minimum of 67 feet depending on favorable slope or soil conditions. The plan does not signify the width of the wetland buffer. This resident questions whether the 276 plan meets the minimum requirements. Visually, the plan does not appear to follow the MCWD Wetland Protection Rule. There is at least one principal residence structure on the map that is unlikely to be in compliance with wetlands setback if the buffer were required to be any larger than shown. 2. The plan shows excavation occurring within the wetland buffer. a. At least one principal residence structure, a cul de sac, and a driveway show excavation within the wetland buffer. No excavation may occur in a buffer according to MCWD Wetland Protection Rule 6. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 103D.341. 3. Inadequate stormwater runoff control for the south easternmost lot. a. The principal residence structure is situated on a slope draining directly to protected wetlands and is situated so close to the wetland buffer that the ability to adequately protect the quality of stormwater runoff by an infiltration basin or other control is strongly questioned. The lot generally slopes toward and has such a long border with protected wetlands as to likely further degrade wetland quality and Lake Minnetonka water quality due to stormwater runoff. 4. Non -buildable lot as the north easternmost lot. a. The lot that comprises the north easternmost lot in the development is not buildable. Any potentially buildable portion of the lot has no road access because it is cut off from the proposed road by wetlands. The permitters are encouraged not to allow such a subdivision that could encourage subsequent attempts to excavate on areas that prohibit excavation. O&A Pass Property Development Phil and Mandy Little 4620 North Arm Lane Orono Planning Commission Meeting — Nov. 18, 2024 Background on this property over the years is that Carol Armstrong Pass' family has a long history in the area, and was approached by a couple of neighbors around her property over the years to purchase some of the property to protect them from development. When asked, Carol said no as she didn't want to sell as she wanted to preserve her land to prevent the possibility of development in the future. She also attempted to gift the land to Orono to be used as a park or protected natural habitat and Orono refused as they did not have the funds to maintain it. Carol also joined along with neighbors to fight against the Bayside Trail Cul de Sac development as she was concerned about what it would do to the wetlands and surrounding area of her property. We are certainly perplexed knowing her wishes for the property that she verbalized to people over the years, and now that after she is gone this land is going to be developed which is what she fought against over the years. The only Armstrong family member that resided in the house on the property that we know of is Carol's brother until his passing. Because the Pass family has never lived out here to my knowledge, other than Carol as a child, we are assuming other members would have little or no attachment to this property. We certainly understand the family's desire to receive compensation for this property since there is no attachment to it since her death. Maybe no one other than Carol knew about any of the surrounding neighbors desire to purchase additional property which is why no one was approached. We only found out about the development this summer when a hunter came on to our property and our neighbor's asking permission to bow hunt on it because he had lost the ability to hunt on the 20 acres behind us due to a development coming in. In contacting the City of Orono they confirmed that it was in the planning stage. I contacted the 10 property owners that share boundaries with the Pass Property. None of them had knowledge of the project. The 11 property owners are; Little Froemming Thull Neilson Sipprell Holloway Nord Paldrmic & Potvin Haus Jabbour White It seems that this development is to be "shoehorned" into a wetland area with no regards to the properties surrounding the development. The area of impervious surface is breathtaking. The fact that it runs 24 ft wide along the entire boundary of our property is unacceptable — the planned buffer is inadequate, there is no protection from 2 inch trees being planted that will provide any protection in our lifetime. 12 inch trees would be a minimum. 278 North Arm Lane serves 8 homes, why is it necessary to have two cul de sacs for 5 homes? Having the road along our boundary will decrease our property value. We would ask that the cul de sacs be removed. Perhaps a long driveway would suffice to each home. I would ask the owners how are we to be compensated for the loss this will cause us? With 2 1/2 acre sites, why do we have a road within 60 feet of our property boundary and the structure on our property? In the 2040 Comprehensive Plan it states "future rural developments will be guided so as to have minimal impact on the land or on existing rural neighborhoods ....... Care will be exercised to ensure that no new development encroaches upon its neighbor's open space activities." This clearly is encroaching upon our open spaces. How can anyone say that site grading, hardcover, wells and septics, storm water facilities, and building pads will preserve this land and protect the natural landscape? Animal species will be disrupted for many years with the amount of hard cover and disruption to their habitat during this development. In the Orono's 2040 Comprehensive Plan "The foremost guiding principle and goal of Orono's planning is to protect and preserve Lake Minnetonka, and all lakes and natural resources, its water quality and recreational assets .... It includes preservation of the associated marshes, wetlands and natural drainageways as the primary, most practical and cost effective method of preventing flooding and of filtering out the nutrient pollution from stormwater runoff .... To maintain our local character and identity. This character is defined by strong neighborhoods, preponderance of wildlife, open spaces, lakes and wetlands. To protect and preserve our many natural resources including all lakes, creeks, marches, wetlands, woodlands, groundwater and steep slopes. To preserve open spaces, light, air and solar access for all citizen while maintaining night sky." We are concerned about this developer having little knowledge of this area other than having stated in their narrative "access to the sought-after Lake Minnetonka — and it being the last of its kind in the area, located off North Arm Dr." It is not located off North Arm Dr., but is located off of North Arm Lane which is just that, a lane, that is not wide enough for two cars to pass at the same time. The narrative states the lane "will service the lots of the development." This development will certainly not "improve the public infrastructure" for this lane or any of the surrounding properties. We do not believe that any of this supports the "feasibility and necessity of the Idyllvale Shores development." The construction and noise will be in our backyard and along the Lane for years. The tree removal is devastating. While there are a number of trees that need to be removed there are many being removed to accommodate "hardcover." This is hardly preservation of a natural habitat. We understand the family has a right to do what they wish with their property, but are concerned with the disregard for the impact this will have on the environment, an old established neighborhood and relationships people thought they had with Carol. Not every square inch of land needs to be developed. We would ask that the Planning Committee not approve this plan at this time. In talking with the Watershed District they said the application would take 1-2 months to make it through their process. What rights do we have as current landowner and citizens from developers and who in Orono represents us? 279 Pass Property Development — Idyllvale Shores Project From Jeff & Pat Thull 612-325-3438 210 - 270 North Shore Drive West We just became aware of the application for development of three properties, one of which adjoins the east border of our property, which we purchased July 2011. We met Carol Pass in 2013, deceased owner of the proposed development property when she approached us regarding the development of the Bayside Meadows property also bordering each of our properties. She expressed her concerns that the development would impact the wetlands on her property (ironically now proposed for development). She asked us to support her efforts to approach the Lake Minnetonka Watershed District to prevent or restrict the Bayside Development plan due to the impact it would have on the Pass property. Now we see a proposal for 5 more homes and associated hardscapes draining into and encroaching on the same property she wanted to preserve. She was very emphatic on her intentions to not develop her property. At the time we expressed our interest in buying the 5-acre parcel next to us from her to assure it would remain undeveloped. She told us of her plan to preserve the wooded area. The appraised value of $10,000 for the parcel adjoining our property suggested to us that the woods were in some type of preservation program. We were quite surprised and disappointed when we received the notice regarding the development and recalled her being adamant that it would never be developed. Sadly, we found out it was being developed after she passed away earlier this year. The following are our concerns on the development of this property: • The development appears to place two, 24' wide roads and two, 50' cul-de-sacs in this small land area • The heavy hardscape of the roads and cul-de-sac will only service 5 home sites • One of the roadways will be placed along the border of current homes. This does not comply with the intent of the Orono 2040 Comprehensive Plan "Care will be exercised to ensure that no new development encroaches upon its neighbor's open space activities." • Why is one 50' cul de sac squeezed between or infringing on the wetlands and servicing only one of the five lots? • Removal of heavy tree cover which currently supports 8-12 deer including two does who each had twins this year, turkeys roosting in the trees and a rare Great Gray owl currently protected by the MN DNR in the Superior National Forest. Wildlife managers and foresters are currently working towards protecting nesting areas across Minnesota. We see the owl and hear its hooting regularly. 280 • Walking trails and lake access is mentioned but are not indicated in the plans and it would appear they would have to be built in the wetlands area. • The project narrative from Blue Pencil Collective references "preserving the land that has been a cherished part of their family's history" yet appears to be clearing a large percentage of the standing forest and installing a large percentage of hardscapes. As a result of the above issues, we suggest the land, forest and wetlands be preserved. If the Council decides to disregard these issues, we strongly suggest the development should be limited to one access road, three homes, and comply with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan as noted above. We appreciate your consideration. Jeff and Pat Thull 612-325-3438 281 From: James Neilson To: Melanie Curtis Subject: Idyllvale Shores Date: Friday, November 15, 2024 7:07:35 AM Hello Melanie - Thank you for sending the information on the proposed development. I will be out of town on the meeting date so I would like for this correspondence to serve as my comments and position for the record. Overall, I believe the plan represents a total disconnect from the City's fundamental underlying principles, goals and philosophy for growth management. The construction of two long cul-de-sac roadways to serve five homesites is blatantly intrusive, Especially the east to west cul-se-sac that ravages the property line with the neighbors living south of the development. The removal of 419 of a total of 1306 significant trees is a gross injustice to this beautiful natural environment and is really quite astonishing and insulting. I see nothing in this plan that conforms to the City's commitment -- . "Orono will retain its own special identity through careful growth management in the best interest of the environment, the natural resources, the watershed of Lake Minnetonka and the community of citizens, both present and future." The proposed lot 5 is next door to my home at 340 North Arm Lane. Everything about the lot 5 development looks like a disaster. The house pad is right up against the wetland buffer at the rear and right up against the side yard setback to the south against my property. The septic drainfield appears to actually encroach into the wetland buffer. The amount of grading work that cuts out the area for the housepad and driveway is severe. The infiltration basin wedged in between the house pad and the property line is in an insane location. How can these areas remain safe, stabilized and protected? Massive tree removal and earth excavation on lot 5 will wipe out any buffer that might have existed between our homes and deny us our pastoral views causing an irreparable detrimental effect. This proposed lot 5 development is not in accordance with the City's vision for responsible development, protection of natural amenities and is not in the best interest of the environment, the natural resources, the watershed of Lake Minnetonka and of the surrounding properties and neighbors. I believe the developer is pushing the limits of site accommodation here and the City needs to be steadfast in its resolve to protect our natural amenities, safeguard the woodland wildlife habitat and preserve the quality of life of the existing immediate neighbors. I urge the City to exercise overwhelming prudence in their review of this proposed development, This area is very environmentally sensitive as the entire valley bordered by North Arm Drive W on the west and Bayside Road on the north drains to the southeast through the property into Lake Minnetonka. It is a huge watershed. This is a delicate and very important natural resource. Furthermore, several adjacent property owners have established homes that are vulnerable to the overdevelopment character of this proposed development. Please act to preserve and protect the established character and vital natural amenities of this site and to protect the individual interests of the immediate neighbors and all Orono citizens. Thank you, James Neilson 282 340 North Arm Lane Orono, MN 55364 283 From: Joe Haus To: Melanie Curtis Subject: Idyl vale Shores development. Date: Friday, November 15, 2024 9:05:32 AM Hi Melanie, thanks for sending over the info on the Idyll vale shores development. The amount of time from the last changes submitted and when the review is scheduled for a project of this size seems rushed and it is difficult as a Orono resident to make time to evaluate the request. With my travel schedule already set and being out of town it is frustrating that I am unable to attend the meeting and ask questions to aid in my understanding. A longer period of time for residents to get up to speed and plan would be warranted. My questions and possible concerns are related to the stormwater management plan and if it will add run off flow of water to my property or impact the wetlands? I see a request for a drainage easement that I would like to understand in more detail what is involved. Can that request be explained in the meeting? There is a natural waterway (stream) south of my property that is active in the spring and wetter periods. It has done a good job of drainage for the 24 years we have had our property. With 5 building sites hard cover and driveways I have concerns about the impacts to drainage affecting specifically my property and the wetlands as a whole. If there are any other requested variances I would like to have them explained as well. I will be on- line for the meeting if possible and all my tech works. Thanks for your consideration and help Joe Haus 284 Mark & Mary Larson 366 North Arm Lane Orono, MN 55364 11/14/24 Re: Proposed Pass Property Development We have lived on North Arm Lane for nearly 39 years. We purchased our then dilapidated 120 year old farmhouse in 1986 when North Arm Lane was just a gravel roadbed, cows grazed on the adjoining property, wildlife was incredibly abundant, dark skies every night and very few neighbors. We consider it a blessing to have lived here and raise our four children in that idyllic setting. We were also fortunate over that time to develop a close friendship with Jean Armstrong (Carol Pass's mother) who was widowed and lived with her son Dick in the original homestead. We knew Jean well enough (and subsequently Carol Pass) to know they would never want their property to be developed as it was the subject of many conversations over the long time we have lived here. We were surprised and saddened to find out about this proposed development and the negative changes it will bring to our neighborhood. Having said that, we also want it known that we value the right of any property owner to sell, divide or develop their property as long as it would strictly conform to the Orono 2040 Comprehensive Plan in close coordination with the City of Orono. Our largest concern is the overall effect of the development and preserving as many of the incredible features of this property, the likes of which have all too easily and quickly disappeared from Orono. This property has steep slopes, big mature woods, abundant wildlife, a majority of wetlands, and drainage into, and access to, Lake Minnetonka. Also of concern are the inevitable damages to North Arm Lane that are sure to occur during construction and the plan for addressing that. Perhaps the current owners would consider reducing the home sites, for example down to 3 or 4 on larger acreage lots to reduce the amount of hard surface areas and mitigate at least some of the negative effects to the surrounding landowners, the land and wetlands and Lake Minnetonka that are sure to occur with this development. Again, we urge the city officials to strictly adhere to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan regarding all these facets of this very unique and special property. Lastly, our desire is that North Arm Lane itself will not be changed as a result of this proposed development. We are saddened to think of the added traffic and noise that will be added on our once quiet lane. North Arm Lane is narrower, by definition than most roads but when it occurs, cars have always safely passed by each other and do so at slower speeds and that's the beauty of it. People who live here drive slowly, some stop side by side and lower their windows to chat. Children safely play and bike on the lane. In the nearly four decades we have lived here there have been no vehicle accidents or injuries on North Arm Lane. Walkers, bikers and runners include North Arm Lane in their outings for its quiet beauty and to briefly escape North Arm Drive that is now more like a racetrack since the Lakeview development went in. We fear that this proposed development might lead to talk of change to the current roadbed resulting in a loss of character that makes the current lane so special. With regards to this we again reference again the 2040 Comprehensive Plan 1.2. "Rural developments will be limited to the extent that they can be served by the existing or planned public facilities and services. New development will not be permitted if it requires the extension of unplanned urban services into the rural area. Privately constructed and maintained roads and recreational facilities will be favored over requirements for additional public facilities". We would appreciate confirmation that there are no changes planned for North Arm Lane itself other than repairs for damages. Thank you for allowing us to submit our input regarding the proposed development. Mark & Mary Larson 285 E U O U U -`o Q � �t g 0 00 L U N O N U r� U iv o � J IT a - 0 2000 4000 Feet VICINITY MAP CONTACTS VATIT1019:4 Bradley J Pass 215 North Arm Lane Orono, MN 55364 Ph: labjpass@gmail.com SURVEY: Cornerstone Land Surveying, Inc. 1970 Northwestern Ave #200 Stillwater, MN 55082 Attn: Daniel L. Thurmes Ph: 651.275.8969 dan@cssurvey.net CIVIL: Civil Methods, Inc. PO Box 28038 St. Paul, MN 55128 Attn: Kent Brander, PE Ph: 763.210.5713 kent.brander@civilmethods.com CIVIL METHODS, INC. P.O. Box 28038 St. Paul, MN 55128 o:763.210.5713 I www.civilmethods.com CITY / TOWNSHIP: City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Ph: 952.249.4600 Melanie Curtis, City Planner Ph: 952.249.4627 mcurtis@oronomn.gov WATERSHED DISTRICT: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 15320 Minnetonka Blvd Minnetonka, MN 55345 Ph: 952.471.0590 Maggie Menden, Permitting Technician Ph: 952.641.4532 mmenden@minnehahacreek.org I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. KENT E. BRANDER DATE: 03-04-2025 LAC. NO.: 44578 DESIGNED: KEB DRAWN: KEB CHECKED: DMP PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR IDYLLVALE SHORES ORONO, MN MARCH 2O25 PROJECT TITLE IL1I170:1 SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION C001 COVER SHEET S101 EXISTING CONDITIONS S102 PRELIMINARY PLAT- OVERALL S103-S104 PRELIMINARY PLAT C401 STREET PLAN & PROFILE C500 GRADING & DRAINAGE - OVERALL C501 GRADING & DRAINAGE C601 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL C602 SWPPP NARRATIVE C701-C702 D ETAI LS C801 TREE PRESERVATION & REMOVAL C802 LANDSCAPING LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE — — SETBACK — — — — — EASEMENT ET WETLAND — - CONTOUR ♦� SPOT ELEVATION X.X% DRAINAGE DIRECTION BITUMINOUS SURFACE ® BITUMINOUS SURFACE, HEAVY CONCRETE SURFACE b LIGHT POST CURB & GUTTER >> STORM SEWER / CULVERT -->--->— DRAINTILE > SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN 6° CLEANOUT ® SANITARY MANHOLE WETLAND BUFFER V V V INFILTRATION/FILTRATION BASIN 0o SEPTIC FIELD rYYWY1. TREE LINE DATE / REVISION: 01-06-2025 Permit Submittal Set. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 01-18-2025 Adjusted Lot Lines per Clty Comments. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 03-04-2025 Added Cul-de-sac at Entry Turn Per City Comments. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTES THE EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN IN THIS PLAN HAS BEEN SURVEYED BY OTHERS; THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. NOTIFY 811 OR GOPHER STATE ONE CALL (1.800.252.1166). THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF Cl/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." PLAN REFERENCES: 1. CITY OF ORONO ENGINEERING DESIGN MANUAL 2. MINNESOTA DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION — STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, LATEST EDITION. 3. CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, LATEST EDITION. 4. UNREINFORCED CONCRETE PER ACI 33OR-08 AND ACI 330.1-03. STORMWATER POND ® ROCK RIPRAP, RANDOM CRUSHED ® EROSION CONTROL BLANKET TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT ® GEOGRID OR ARTICULATED CONCRETE STABILIZED CONST. ENTRANCE , — SF — SILT FENCE , SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG INLET PROTECTION —� FENCE Know mars below■ X oxo� RETAINING WALL call befom you dig. PROJECT: IDYLLVALE SHORES PROD. LOCATION: 215 NORTH ARM LN, ORONO, MN 55364 PROJ.OWNER: BRADLEY J PASS COVER SHEET SHEET NO: 286 LEG EN D FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT FOUND MONUMENT (AS NOTED) SET IRON PIPE MARKED WITH MN LICENSE NO. 25718 Tv CABLE TV PEDESTAL i BUILDING LINE E" ELECTRIC METER T ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER BITUMINOUS SURFACE GUY WIRE -0- POWER POLE CONCRETE SURFACE GM GAS METER P TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UT UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE co SANITARY CLEANOUT ou OVERHEAD UTILITY O WATER WELL uc UNDERGROUND GAS MB x MAIL BOX x FENCE UO UNIDENTIFIED MANHOLE *TREES FLOOD INFORMATION: PORTIONS OF THIS PROPERTY LIES WITHIN ZONE AE, AREAS DETERMINED TO BE WITHIN THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN OTHER AREAS INCLUDING ALL BUILDINGS ARE LOCATED IN ZONE X, AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN AS SHOWN ON FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 27053CO285E HAVING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF NOVEMBER 4TH, 2016. THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 931.1 IS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY. VERIFIED BY OTHERS. AREA' TOTAL AREA AS SHOWN = 1 ,104,200 SQ.FT. / 2 5.3 5 ACRES yo-ts � Gs� o � 1004 O I 8 °5 ' 4 2. 3 R INAG & UTI s 4 L 10 .85 OF I YLL Al- FA SB LI \,'L 5 3 L 1 gq8. 9Aa� 6 i 100 .85 56 2 02.Sq SB 6 I 73 B I LI SB 3 I� tio�sv� AGE �p R 00 O 1014" I 0� 4 FOUND I - I PIPE 960-1, 0 J�= 3 WETLAND *SEE NOT APPPO IYATE CHANN 1 I � 3 _- O �V lM �7/1 SB �54 g6g 969.78 2 L4 - wL w 8' - - CNP"S L xs ® p n 5P e . SB 222 0h g57.74 0 \1\2\\ oh SB5L g5g.88 ou - FLOOR =g66.3 �z O 6 ' S 22 96 52 r6 c 'SS 960 6, LEGAL DESCRIPTION: <�Ailllililllllilli (THE FOLLOWING LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS PROVIDED BY THE OWNER. NO TITLE OPINION OR TITLE COMMITMENT WAS PROVIDED) SUBJECT TO CHANGE. 1 All that part of the East 112 of the Northwest 1 /4 of Section 6, Township 1 1 7 North, Range 23, West of the 5th Principal Meridian, bounded by a line described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Northwest 1 /4 of the Northeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of said Section 6; thence South along the West line of said East 112 of the Northwest 1 /4 to a point distant 854.5 feet North of the Southwest corner of said East 112 of the Northwest 1 /4; thence East parallel with the South line of said East 1 /2 0 of the Northwest 1 /4, a distance of 280 feet; thence South parallel with the West line of said East 1 /2 of the Northwest 1 /4 to the South line of said East 112 of the Northwest 1 /4; thence East along the South line of said East 1 /2 of the Northwest 1 /4, a distance of 33 feet; thence North parallel with the West line of said East 112 of the Northwest 1 /4, a distance of 854.5 feet; thence East parallel with the South line of said East 112 of the Northwest 1 /4 to a point distant 22 rods East of the West line of said East 112 of the Northwest 1 /4; thence North parallel with the West line of said East 1 /2 of the Northwest 1 /4 to the South line of said Northwest 1 /4 of the Northeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4; thence West along said South line to the point of beginning. ALSO, All that part of the Southeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of Section 6, Township 1 1 7, Range 23, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the Southeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of said Section thence West along the North line of the Southeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of said Section 6 to a point distant 22 rods East of the Northwest corner of the Southeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of said Section \\6; thence South and parallel with the West line of the Southeast 1 /4 of the Northwest \1 /4 of said Section 6 to a point distant 854.5 feet North of the South line of the \Northwest 1 /4 of said Section 6; thence East to a point on the East line of the \Northwest 1 /4 of said Section 6 distant 854.5 feet North of the Southeast corner of the Northwest 1 /4 of said Section 6; thence North along said East line to the point of beginning. ALSO, That part of the Southeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of Section 6, Township 1 1 7, Range 23, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Southeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4; thence West along the South line of said Southeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 a distance of 1020.6 feet to the point of beginning of "Line A"; thence North parallel with the West line of said Southeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 a distance of 854.5 feet to the point of beginning of the property begin described, and said "Line A" there ending; thence East parallel with said South line a distance of 290 feet; thence South parallel with the West line of said Southeast 1 /4 of �- the Northwest 1 /4 a distance of 75 feet; thence West parallel with said South line a distance of 290 feet to said "Line Al 1 ; thence North along said "Line Al 1 to the point of beginning. EXCEPT the right of way of North Arm Lane, as dedicated as public highway, per Document No. 7835812. r d AND Q cs Outlet B, IDYLL VALE FARM, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin Countyl z Minnesota. 0 c \ v 0 �q50 FOUND I q48 f 223 - NIPE CH RO F ND 1/2 t9.98 CH IRON FOUND 112 PIPE N VIED I / - INCH IRON RLS 14700 PIPE q46 89°53'44"E 971.93 0,44 SB 22' / wL g3q.g6 4z 94? w� wL -� \/ wL WL q44/ I ' �� 3 �p2 q40 rev I JM / <�. WETLAND 2 3 Ix *SEE NOTE �SB L6 q46. 5 L rx I q3� �q .77 6 M / 4 6� 7.4 7M < q .82 94 8 qk ' 1� SB 5 > S 31 L5 q� 0 L6 ' g55.3 �SB 228 5 93q.70 q6 I q 9. 25 \ S 4 L5 q6.5 731.81 2 8 ° 8 f o �+ - S89lu °58'15" VIT W 0 w FOUND I 12_ o s H IRON GARAGE01 0°13 0 PIPE 938 0 '75. 9 ,s -- 290. - - 0 911 GARAGE 89 058 ' 15" o 5 ,Y SURVEY NOTES: WETLAND NOTES: 1 WAY OF 1. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE HENNEPIN COUNTY 1. WETLANDS SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY WERE o o i/ W N R A L NE COORDINATE SYSTEM NAD 1 983-1 996. PROVIDED BY THE OWNER AS SHOWN ON m Z �__ E I N THE 2. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN PER VISUAL SURVEY BY DAMES R. HILL, INC. DATED 8-12-23. z w N Q Q A DI IOF K INSPECTION. THERE MAY SOME UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, NOT VERIFIED BY CORNERSTONE LAND �i- J GAS, ELECTRIC, ETC. NOT SHOWN OR LOCATED. SURVEYING, INC. m < 3. CONTOURS SHOWN PER LIDAR DATA OBTAINED FROM o S=2 o DC f THE DNR MNTOPO WEBSITE. NOT FIELD VERIFIED. T_ Q 4. DATE OF FIELD LOCATION OF BUILDINGS, ROAD, ETC. = SEPTIC/WELL y, 5-3-24. ADDITIONAL TOPOGRAPHY ON 9-9-24 IN ♦ I Q'�0 AREAS OF PROPSOED ROADS AND WITHIN 75' OF OHWL. THE EXISTING SEPTIC AND WELL WERE NOT LOCATED pC 5. ELEVATIONS BASED ON GPS DERIVED VALUES FOR NAVD AT THE TIME OF THE SURVEY. 88. <170 Z TITLE NOTES: NO TITLE OPINION OR TITLE COMMITMENT WAS PROVIDED THAT WOULD SHOW EASEMENTS OR ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD. EASEMENTS MAY EXIST THAT ARE NOT SHOWN. SUBJECT TO CHANGE. 1 . 10' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS AS SHOWN ON OUTLOT B. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOTES: THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HAVE BEEN LOCATED FROM FIELD SURVEY INFORMATION AND EXISTING DRAWINGS. THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN COMPRISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHER DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED ALTHOUGH HE DOES CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE. THIS SURVEY HAS NOT PHYSICALLY LOCATED THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL LOCATE TICKET NUMBER(S) XXXXXXXX. SOME MAPS WERE RECEIVED, WHILE OTHER UTILITIES DID NOT RESPOND TO THE LOCATE REQUEST. ADDITIONAL UTILITIES OF WHICH WE ARE UNAWARE MAY EXIST. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! Gopher State One Call " V TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1 166 960 oNw_ \ 7zq� 0� 1" 11 ORDINARY HIGH WATER -ELEV: g2q.4 3 WETLAND 3 o *SEE 928 FE ZONE AE 3 LAKE MIIVNf 01VKA 0 (NOR TH ARM) �y ----FE A 13ASE 0 1 FL OD ELE g31.1 0 80 160 %7%=Mm NORTH 970 0 \ 40 COco O I DYLLVALE SHORES CONTACT: KASEY JOHNSON BLUE PENCIL COLLECTIVE 651.419.6367 kasey@bluepencilcollective.com COUNTY/CITY: H E IV IV E P I IV CO U IVY OF REVISIONS: DATE REVISION 5-8-24 PRELIMINARY ISSUE 6-30-24 ADD SEPTIC BORINGS 9-10-24 ADDITIONAL TOPO CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the state of Minnesota. DanielL. Thurmes Registration tuber: 2571 8 Date:-_5__ 4------- PROJECT LOCATION: z 7 5 NORTH ARM LANE PID#0611723240001 PID#0611723230001 PID#0611723240002 Ek �h Suite #200 197 Northwestern Ave. Stillwater, MN 55082 Phone 651.275.8969 dan@cssurvey net CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC. FILE NAME SURVBPC01 PROJECT NO. BPC24001 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 287 0 O 75 U 7 0 Ln O co L U N O c� U r� U �o @ 0 o LL IL / \ \ \ / / o / / \ — / 03 / / I I I \ \ \ \ // // III I I III 1 \ 9�0 \ \ /lll� I I I 1 \ \ 0 //^ 1 / \\\�o\\\o \\ oo\\ \ o� \\ .\\\\90`� \\ °\��\\ ° \ \ j- IJ� ��=363.01'� \� --�--- / /// �/ `�o I I IIIII I I I \ \\ \\—_— '`� /� /�I I I \ / I 1 \ I I I III \�\ \\ \\ \ \\ IN, � / / / / / • • \ 2Q \ \ \o0 f 1 o 711 All °� Q 04 +f+ •� \ \ —\ \\\ \\\\ \— /�%ice Ill//l \ 1 1 \ I _� / �- --IN, \ * * \ \980 \ \ \\ \ \ •• rn \ / \ \ \ \ \\-----///�/ • \ I \ \ \ — /// II \ \ \\ \\80 / I I I I I I I l \ l ,• •; goo \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \_ I I I I / / I I I 1 ► \ •*i' \ 00 I,I II\I .�\ \\\ \\\ +�'++'+•f,.•��;++l•` \\��o \\(mo°s\pp.�ppopzz /\\ o /pAb- 00000000o�6_000-0( _ — — — — 900000 oI0po�p°o �oo"papdoppoopoogoo oa°0006op�o �o O _� -_-98 o\ 0/0, / o°00°0°O f+ff•f••00960 „1I /J—- 1 — \ \ - \\\ \ IN, \ vvv rn� �I I \\ // / —_ J_ \�\_%, <\ \---- / I \ \ \ \ \ o \ \ I • • • + vvvvvv I __ \ \\ \ \ �• • \ + vvvvvv 1 1 \ / / / \� \ \ `S0, \\\ \ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ 980 I\ \ \ `*•�•*•� ,*, vvvv of I I �� �/ / / _` \ \ \\\\ \\\ \ \---------I-do \ \ \ 100 \ \ 217.10' \ \ \ \ 235.63 I I I II . ++\+- - f•'fs�\ f+f�f+ • • — — — — / / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ o — — _0 L —\\ 9o9oI 8-\\\ \ Cw \,--O— o °\dop\ �\\\ \\\�Ii \c\9 O \\ i\�\ I 1\\\ \ \ \ \ IIyII\\\ °r'°gI 0• � •�+ �•• •+ h••'••_\• •'• *• f•f\ ,/ •/I /'V •i-`ff�Y� III IIII II /fr.I/ �••,. (•'� V••+'7'••+♦•'� ++�••./•°�f��t fff�•af.- rI III .� • • • •f * •f • •er•�••/ •\ N .944 • .•• /4••/ • •••+/ ••!• •/••• ••1/••+ //•+'• ••+� '•/ •'�••*•I f••/�*' f9•*s/ f•// ••�F�/!/ ••�/ // //•• / / /•Y/ +/ / /++/�' /*1 •O '••/�y/ •+ +I•,\--)f /— +\•f%II � / —•*•f\;i+ .'s _*— *,,\. _ �— •\ ' • *\'�'_ �\ 0 / c, •t 5••••/� ••�•••• ••• I I ITI •t298.46s.— ----�o���� 04 m�OpO�\� 8.64, o 0 01 L••• • • • • • • + • \ 1_ -*••s �\p••��,\\��\••\ `QQ O O 0O4 +1M ` -' DO0 _ ••••p�Ot0 0VO 2•O ✓ R\ \ O0O f3+'� 9 �UO— — — =� 7 pi0�°O\ tt\\I o_0°O0 0 o0°/ 0pO °. f i `. N I rn • • L� O ff•••'/' 0 •N+ f,O) °p°p • 0O 0 oO 0O °ow o ipCp,••• •• :'o \\ v v vv o°00� �o 940 *vvv vOoo' \Oo \oodpb°o°o o OOpoOJ0,op'oO Qb �0o•+\++ vv• -A- `pvvvvvv "' - � 0 0 dO g Opo�ooOoO \ \��oOp°o7p%p VVV V O�O lJg00opOpOok **++ • .-+•+1 N vvvvvvvvvv17 9°o 0 0 0po\ -Sr y'+f• *O6bf* °opoo�oO 6,�boo5� L<Ao b�o 0CRE + + + +�o0,d/ + �Xvvvvv \\\ \2 �vvvvv 17 41.61V t v V iD 87171 SQ vvv vv I - Ov \-\— �- _ I I Irri }+f•f•�f •+f+*I. '.+'ma +• 00 �\ f+++:+ - - - - - ++++-,0 CpWETL% ND 2c, 99 SQ F \—O 9cv ��19 CRES I `° • • s+ • II \II \(( \ \ �\�I/� \ /\/ I // /�/\/ // /g\\ N I�3:g�l''3'*�+P Op0 o •.+`+o ++ 5 +++0 ++'1•�`�+e-+'; •�1'• ' +•j I� L \ I \ � \ C9 \ O 0 O / f+f tf 332428 SQ FT +f++ +f / fit • + +f f+ \ I No°f oQp� 1 I / 7.63 ACRES + + r f+Al + + + + \ \ \ 0�g\.'o*qqqoo'Opo-pp*I\960 IA- ++\ + + ++ + + •+++f•4f+\ /• — -+�. /+!�++1*+ Il►++ •+•++ ++ •+• + • 6of O Q ,,,N ++ '+'+'+'\''4'+i+++ .S..X�CA p I 1 \ \ \ '+'+'+'+\ ( +*+ +*+ *X 70 1 — ROW \ \ ° I / 133.72= 10.07_ 1oL6-�ODpo0p0o�\0'+ff++f+�� oa0 O pp +f+. c0 1.11 ACRES O °f + 039 . • �•ff\++�ff+•+ff+•+*f•+ I1 +•++ \O % o ooOo ff ++•+ff+ •+ #+•ff+ +•+ + ++ + \1 1 A ....... • • • • I � moo— —T — ,1 1 \ 304.27/ 271.59' 150.03'/ O \ \ \ \ + + + + + + + + + + + -40.85 " o°o°° \ •�� +�' . + :'. '— — — —731 .81'+ �•'f *•+NVI — — — — — t e: w ;�•: � I oxs? v Iri ,reN rp 022 o I Li CIVIL METHODS, INC. P.O. Box 28038 St. Paul, MN 55128 o:763.210.5713 I www.civiImethods.com •-x�• \ 0) 8.7 IN, // 1/ l l l i/ I I I Q III I 1 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE: 03-04-2025 KENT E. BRANDER LAC. No.: 44578 DESIGNED: KEB DRAWN: KEB CHECKED: DMP 10-281.22"-' V 944J — g1 vv 1 DATE / REVISION: 01-06-2025 Permit Submittal Set. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 01-18-2025 Adjusted Lot Lines per Clty Comments. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 03-04-2025 Added Cul-de-sac at Entry Turn Per City Comments. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 1 1 \ I \ \ 9 \ \ \ L J PROJECT: IDYLLVALE SHORES PROD. LOCATION: 215 NORTH ARM LN, ORONO, MN 55364 PROJ.OWNER: BRADLEY J PASS 0 80 160 Feet SITE DATA: BENCHMARK SEE SURVEY DOCUMENTATION LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE — — — SETBACK — — — — — EASEMENT LOT WIDTH MEASUREMENT WETLAND BOUNDARY WETLAND BUFFER BOUNDARY CONTOUR _ WETLAND WETLAND BUFFER SEPTIC AREA vvvv STORMWATER MANAGEMENT vvvvv BASIN ® SLOPES >30% TOTAL PROPERTY AREA: ±25.35 AC EXISTING HARD SURFACE: t0.15 AC PROPOSED HARD SURFACE: t1.87 AC PROPOSED HARD SURFACE %: 7.4% ZONING: LR-1 A & RR-1 B DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (SAME FOR BOTH ZONES) LOT AREA (MIN): 2.0 AC LOT WIDTH (MIN): 200 FT HEIGHT (MAX): 30 FT SETBACKS (SAME FOR BOTH ZONES): SETBACK VALUES IN FEET STREET/ FRONT INTERIOR SIDE SIDE STREET REAR/ STREET PRINCIPAL BLDG 50 30 30 50 ACCESSORY BLDG 50 15 30 15 OVERSIZE ACC. BLDG. 50 30 30 50 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES 25 15 15 15 SITE CONDITIONS: WOODED; SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT: RURAL AND LAKESHORE RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED USE: RURAL RESIDENTIAL Know what's below Call before you dig. PRELIMINARY PLAT - OVERALL SHEET NO: S102 288 U 0 U 0 Q 0 0 66 0 U N 0 U_ co C) J s IT a- \\\ / 472.86' p 10 rb \ — q /'rb000000 /��"o 00000 e0000Qo01010� - 0a \ _— /// / / / i� \ �O� ` \ •I�I l / jp1 OOOOOOO/oQ,ec00 091000000010/tIII o 06060I��; o///// <rOOlOOOOQ_0�60000000 �00 00000�. Oq.00000:0� oRLO O oo000000�0000000 --9_9 p o�6�0- -0, — 0000 \\ \\ \ \\ HOUSE PAD \ / \09/ /' r __ _ / / / / // ��/ / / / / //--- IN, \ \ �0�� \ I \�`.� \ \ G=1011.2 \ / / IAT1 I .p00' 1 �/' j \ / \ 0\ 95/40ASFGROSS rpo 0SFWT cO g�./I // / ��o — 970 -63.68 \ 9/,\ \\\ \\\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ //9549�/SF qRY, CONTIbUOUS I/ _ \ \ \ / / J 9g6 /I _ / / / _ �/ \ I I/ / / ----\ IN, \\ \ --361.58_,— _L— EXISTING \\ cu I / / / �`�� / / / / // / ggZ OFF SITE\ BUILD- IN / / /oQ�c - 98969)0 .'\?.55 .Ge00o 0o --- \ ----- --_-l0�00 0000 0cr o020 0o�/o°Ooj0 N g000000�00 oo900roo dOU10 2 /0 0500 0 / 00//A0 0006 ION ocj IN, 1161) 1 \ \ IIII \ \1 II ol \ \ --- / r�i I / ���,0000�o�oo / I� M_� \\ O o00 o OO . . \ \ \ 1010' r �1 I i / 00 00 oom' / �2 c� / \ \ \ \ 000ca�OOoff/ / g I _ I / / / / I / 1002 I .9°� Ogo / % 0go 00eo0ryI-, L 2 / // //// // //// // /___- --- / / // //� 1a,� />�71 1SFGROSS -' � \ \ \ 50 ROW -�/ / //� // / ,°�°� / ///'! � b/' �SF1'IVET h -// / / / / / Ile \ \ I / / 1 / / / / / // \ \ \ ADDL)BLVID o �� ��/ / / / / // �.&7f7l SFB1�g ' 960 — \ \ / �- 189.35 J, / \ \'4� 2 SP QROs�\ _ / / o _ _ �3 �-eR�, coNtl�uous / r -- - o- ��-y - / / / \ \ 1_ \ 6.S Eli\ / _ g � �. �.-.�9 �..- 1` / / l 974- 972 _ // / / / / - - - - \ \ \ \ \ \\/ _'i / OO `�a.50'� ���-r��182.37' //// / / / 387.27'. /�/ --- O O / / Id 7 / �' O O - - r's._ _ �- / / - - -/- + + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - - --275.89 �� - r + + + + + + + + / / + + Ile --- \ I O O 0 0 o�6 / 91 ,� �M / / / / g,� + + + + + + + + + + / + + + + + + + / / + + \ q,o •60 6 / \ g9 1 / 12 F0F5+�, �/ �0 0 0"6 0 0 0 D-o� - - f - - 2 / / + + + + + = / / / / f/+ + % + //++++ ++�+ +++++ +++++++ 00q-000 g'00P'/ //�O 0000.0OOOq + + + �+ + +.�°J / // + + + +�+ � \ / �- + + + + +/+ + O 0A0q'00 0�'/ 00 0000e00000 -+ � + +i _ + + + ✓_+ T / \ �' / +� + + + + +� / + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \ O �, o0 0 / 0000el0000 / \ i 9A / / / / / / \ \ / I / \o��� / 0000e'000 / i/ // \ / / \ \ \ \ \ ao O O f=+ + + + + + + + + + + + +/+ + + / + + + + + + 9 \\ Q% / (�OOC1/ + + ..... /+ + + + + + + _/ +/+/+ + + / / / // + + + + + +b // / / D / �/+ + + + + - + + + + / \1-11 / \ 9) \ \ 80 ,r / I / .\p // / ++ ++ � . +.+/' — — — . +/+++i+* / Y / / / �2� OJ / / / I \ i / + +Y+++++++�++i O / / / \ !+ + / + + ` /++ ++ + / / �� _ � / // + +++++++� + �� // 4�i86.SF fsF6 + + / + + /` +/+ + + i / /+ + + ++++++++�++�+ + + / / / 1�'116.SF WET LL + + �+� ' + + + / / + + + DOUSE PO \+ � + + + + + +/ + + .+. + + + 0 / / + + / + + + +/ + + / + + + + / j'26PA ,s1<�V- O + + + + + + + + + /+ + + + / / / + + + + + + + + + + + + + +. _ - / + + + J + + + + + / / + + + + + +/+ + + + + - / / �/+ / / f� G=973 , + + + k- /+ + +/ /'��/ _� +++//+ �' 19 / Y �� � / / /1 / / / I / / - — 97 04 7- -r J 964 /+++++ // - lip — / /' P // k A +++++ EXISTING / / �g 0000, 968 // 9rO0 - _-� + + + I 122.48' // / ++++ \+++ / / j/� OFFSITE / r ►n- - - -C='- - .// ++ +++++ + I + ++++++++ + J / / L BUILDING / / / �� - - - - \ ham/ < < < < < < + �+++++++I++++ I I - + +� + + +++++++++++i' / / / 100, / / / / // / / r��° / cs+ J — _ern // / p / / ap - BASIN 1 < ° <+++�+++++I +++:++++++++++ + ++++++++++ �" \ / I o s? - - — T < < < < < .+/++I++++ +++++ ++ + + + + + + + + (FILTRATION) < < 1 \ .+ + + + �+ + + + + / \ 1 °' / I I // ��. -t--- — — O < <a= PLUS 8 <ACCESS <<< I �+ + +1 + + + / + + + //// / // // // /// / ///"'I �� / // / � \I�++++I++ + +1++ I (6<a<a' +� ++ i/ / / �,�-�/I o //f��9�8f� / / ��i / /�/ ArL//<<<< <�� / ° 0 9 . 2�✓—/ ++ <a <9\< <oo�\0boI + ++ I ad' 0-\'00r\00\ I000 11 =243.68 M ++0 00 �1\°°�0040NORTH ARM LANE/0)� A0L0 0 °� `II � ++I+75.00 / +1+ oo00�%000000I \ \\\ �+ + + + + + + + +. . + + + +� ++ 000000 0\00\ 1\I1 \ \\ 1/\ 2 + + + �+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ + / 65.31 9.6JdU0 O0 �OI' + + + +. -r0 Ci�OO�pr 1 + + ++++�+++\+\+\�++++ \000_0 \OOO000o0 0o�o 0 0r, oO ++/+ + M + +\+ �+ � +++++++ + 662.7000 O�0;0 go0-o 0 Oee+ +�+_c + �f o o-a 0 0 +/+ + + + + ��+ + rO/+ + + + +I 000o000/0000 + + \+ + ++ ++ 1 +, o 000�"'n00 9+ + + + 0n'+(�+ ZOOOo�C ++� 1++I+++ BASIN 3 \`9 �0+0000c0+/+ +I++ O 0 0� 0 o 010 + INFILTRA ON ENT, / / \ \ \ 01 �+, I I1I II \\ I 1\ t1 I I1 I II I I PLUS 8 I I I I I t +_/ ++++j+ +I BASIN 2 956 + +�o\\ �o\0 \� \\+ ++++++(INFILTRATION) N ++ + 9�o +c! O/O ++ PLUS 8' ACCESS \\\ �\\\ T -F + + + + + + 1\ N // / / / //�+++++ L05 \ ++++++ I to IN, / / + + + + + 332428 SF GROSS ++++++ EXISTING OFF SITE BUILDING +++/+ �70239SFWET ++++ I \\ \\ I 1 1 rn \ I// /----=-------- — �H{fU�E'P / // +++++++�' 162189SFDRY I +\++++ �' 1 \ I I I 1 1 I / / / // /// / -/� --- S? �4.2 + + 95621 SF DRY, bONTIGUOUS + I + - / \ 1 \ \ 1 \ I / / / / / / �// / // / / / - - - + + + + +� +I+ + N I I / //// / / /// --�— — 5. �o / CIVIL METHODS, INC. P.O. Box 28038 St. Paul, MN 55128 o:763.210.5713 I www.civilmethods.com / + + + + �/ +Ir.++D)+++— / +++++/% 40' ++++ // /�-- +++I++++ � "+ O I++++++I I III \ I / _-- /+++:++I++I+++ I l r \ ++,g�:+I++I I� I I +I�/I++ +I ++ I III / I l I �+ + .._.. +++I+ + I I III I l I l l I I IIII IIII l l // ( I+++ LOT 5 DEVELOPMENT I + ++ + I I I• I �/ I I / / // l I I I I I I I I I I I/ / I I 1 /// /// / /.— �I+ I GRADING TO SET / %++\+++ ++ HOUSE PAD ELEVATION , +++ +\ + ` / 1 / / / / I I I 1 143.56 +++� + LI +J � SEE SHEET S104 — �'— — I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. KENT E. BRANDER DATE: 03-04-2025 LIC. NO.: 44578 DESIGNED: KEB DRAWN: KEB CHECKED: DIMP DATE / REVISION: 01-06-2025 Permit Submittal Set. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 01-18-2025 Adjusted Lot Lines per City Comments. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 03-04-2025 Added Cul-de-sac at Entry Turn Per City Comments. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT: IDYLLVALE SHORES PROD. LOCATION: 215 NORTH ARM LN, ORONO, MN 55364 PROJ.OWNER: BRADLEY J PASS 0 60 120 Feet BENCHMARK SEE SURVEY DOCUMENTATION LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE — — — SETBACK - — — — - EASEMENT LOT WIDTH MEASUREMENT - WETLAND BOUNDARY - — - WETLAND BUFFER BOUNDARY — — CONTOUR Cj WETLAND *.*.'. WETLAND BUFFER SEPTIC AREA ® SLOPES >30% PRELIMINARY PLAT Know what's belon Call before you dig. SHEET NO: S101 289 IL 0 0 .. t 6� 0� / / a� \ \ I I \ I ----- \ \' + ' I ' I �- d' � b — ++ +++ °/ i I —_— �\ I I II I I 1 I p, / // / /� Q9 \ I I I \ \\ \ \ \ I ' I \ I I \ \ \ I I I I \ \\6 AbIN�\ �8 I \/ I I I I I I \ / I / \0 \ I , / ` I ' I I 1 C / I I \ \ i \ \ I 1/ , ® ---------- Do - ,+ / �—/ - 46I _-- // //751 � /-- / -- // I _ — / 1 /P ,-- \\\ w \ + I iI II _ I / I/ \ I I I I I I I I , II / I !�+,\+ +l I ' ' �( I + I I I / l \ / 70 I , \ \ . \ \�- \ �1�\ +�\ M �. +� \ I�c"v+\ I \\\ \ I / i + , ' /--' �++ ' ' // /, // '/ ' �/ ' ` ��'� ; / ►III /',' ,/ , / / , / i �� \_/ I \ \ \ I _- ++ � I Z ; J ; ,/ ,/ ,, ,/ + / l l / // / l / ' / I / \I / //I ;; I II1I I 1► /, l ,I , ,I / l l / l \ I II I III, I I /, �I / +�+ llll I ' lll''1'l' '-\\/l IlIlI'l III l/I + I II I I I II I I I II Z//1 I ► o ��1+ I III I I III I 11 l / / ' / I i I _+\1`\1 \1 I I I II,I I\, I III I 1 I I I _lI I I I l I I I I l -T �1� 1' 11 — �— / I I I 1I iI I 1\ r llII 290 E O O U U 0 L Ln O co L U N O c� U r� U �o @ 0 o a` LL CIVIL METHODS, INC. P.O. Box 28038 St. Paul, MN 55128 o:763.210.5713 I www.civiImethods.com 6131 �C0 �ou co — END CONC. C&G, R412 BEGIN CONC. C&G, B612 ti� Q'- END CONC. C&G, B612 BEGIN CONC. C&G, R412 Street A, 9+50 - 17+00 M N END CONC. C&G, B612 1� R c 00' R200' CONC. C&G, B612 C, _ 24' 280.00 BEGIN CONC. _-- C&G, B612 .. ;:. 4:67, :•••.: �i.,jl/,�, •.•: :?:'fit :3: ,i i.�-; !:�% '�1jy. `f� ii � ..i1:!�•. it�•I`. STREET A 1 - -407 00o---- ----- ----t---- -r- �- - LOW PT. -----r---- -- - -- --------- ----+---- - - - - - - --- --------- :_T1-+24.tS---- - - - - - - - - - - --- _ IL- +0 ---- - - - - - ----+---- - - - - - - - - - - ELEV.- 4�3---- -----�---- ---- Vw LLI(D II ---- ----- ----�---- -----�---- ----�—r) r; -- -----�---- — — swTl-+ .33- -� �oo ----- ---- ----- ----- K: 747�--- 6 4 -----L�------- - ---- a- UJI -� - ----J ----- ----L---- -----L---- ----- etr — -VC: . 120.00 - + ---93g�-- — — — — — ----L---- — — — — — L — — — — I — — — — - L — — — — I -- -- ---- ------- ---- - — — — — — — — — — — — — — ----—�-- ---- ---Nc-T > -----L — — — — I I I I I I > I I ---�---- --T---- -- -�- - - - \--- ----T---- ----T---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -----I----- - - - - - - - - - -- T--- -- -T - -- -----�---- -----�---- - -- - -- --t---- ----�- -- ----t---- -----r---- ---- - - - - - -- t--- -----r---- -- --+---- -----� ----+---- - - - - - - - - - -- -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - --- --+---- -----� - --+---- -----�---- --------- -- +--- -----�---- --- --�---- -----I - -- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- -- EXI NG CL GRAD ------- ----J----- — — — — — — — -----L---- ----J----- -- L--- -----L---- --�---- - - - - - - - - - - - -- --- ----- ---- ---------- -- -L--- -----L---- ---- ------- I ---- ----- I -- --- I -----�---- I ---- ----- I ---- --- I -----I---- I ---- I ------- - - - - I ----- --- I --- - - I - - - - L - - - - I -- I - - - - - -- I - - - -- - - I - - - L - - - - I ---- - - - - --T---- -- FK0 OSED-CC E----T— -- \----�---- — — — — — — — — — -- -T — —— -----�---- - - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — T — 7� — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — T — — — — — — — — r — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — t — — —� — — \ — r — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — t — — — — — — — — — — + — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — + — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — + — — — — — — — — I— — — — — — --+---- ---- — — — — — ----+---- ---��---- --------- -- +--- -----�---- - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — + — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — + — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — + — — — — — — — — — — — — ------- ----J----- ----L---- ---- L--�- ----J----- -- -L- -- - - - - - L - - - - --�---- - - - - - - - - - - ----L---- ----- - - - - - - - - - - -- L--- - - - - - L - - - - --�---- I --------- I ----�---- I -----I -- I --------- I ----�--- I -----L---- I -- --------- - - - - - - I - - -----� - -- - - - - --------- --- -- I -- - -----I - - ---- - - - --- --T---- - - - - - - - - - ----T---- -----�---- ---- - - - - - -- -T - -- - - - - - - - - - ---- -- - - - - - - - - ----- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -t---- ---- ----- ----t---- -----r---- - -- ----- -- -t--- - o0 -- ---- --�---- ---- - - - - - ----+---- - - - - - C)� -- ---- --+---- ---- - - - - - ----+---- -----�---- -------- -- +--- +0 -- - - - - --�---- ---- ----- ----4----- -----�---- ---� ----- -- 4- - - o°'---- �u ---- -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - --- -- --- ---- --7z- - - - - --�---- ----J----- ----L---- -----L---- ----J�- -- -- L--- ---- a-``' / -- - - - - — - - - - I - - - - - - - - - - ----L---- - - - - - L - - - - I - - - - - - -- L- -- - - - - - - - - - I - - - - — — - - - - - ---- I I I I I I g0 I I I I I I 00— _;A --�---- -----I----- ----T---- - - - - - - - - - -----I---- --- ---f -----�---- - - ---- - - - - - --t---- ---- - - - - - - - - - t - - - - -----r---- - - - - - - - - - - t - - - - -----r---- ---- --+---- -- - - - - - - ----+---- - - - - - - - - - - ----+---- -----�---- - ---4- - - - - - - ----+---- - - - - - - - - - - ---+---- -----�---- - - --�---- - --I - -------- - - - - - ----- -----�---- - - O C0 d') L c0 M O (_0 00-4- 00 CO N I C) N 00 CO cD N Orn N00 006 1r04 O CD O 00') 0-)00 O-) 0') r-[�_ CT) 00 Q0c0 M 00 (oc0 O-) M I M 1 6+00 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. KENT E.BRANDER DATE: 03-04-2025 LAC. No.: 44578 15+00 DESIGNED: KEB DRAWN: KEB CHECKED: DMP 14+00 13+00 DATE / REVISION: 01-06-2025 Permit Submittal Set. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 01-18-2025 Adjusted Lot Lines per Clty Comments. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 03-04-2025 Added Cul-de-sac at Entry Turn Per City Comments. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 12+00 1 1 +00 10+00 00 ?a 0 P_0�0 0 �0"o 0 100 0 f0o°o� 0 0 0 00000 `00000 � 0000 1020 1015 1010 1005 1000 995 • 975 970 965 955 PROJECT: IDYLLVALE SHORES PROD. LOCATION: 215 NORTH ARM LN, ORONO, MN 55364 PROJ.OWNER: BRADLEY J PASS N 0 50 100 Feet GENERAL NOTES: 1. The subsurface utility location information in this plan is utility quality level D. This utility quality level was determined according to the guidelines of Cl/ASCE 38-02, titled "Standard Guidelines for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data." Engineer does not guarantee the accuracy of utility locations or that all existing utilities are shown; Contractor is responsible for locating utilities prior to digging. 2. See Certificate of Survey and Preliminary Plat for additional existing and proposed information. 3. Dimensions are to top back of curb or edge of bituminous, unless noted otherwise. 4. See detail and note sheets for additional specifications. STREET PLAN & PROFILE SHEET NO: C401 291 U O 0 U 0 Q 0 0 6> 0 U N 0 co C O J o s IT a - i t -- / rr I I I I(f) \ cb p � -00006/le / \ \ _,-r000000000uY �oo�Ooo\ / / 000000000090.00o o00l0000e�00000Q100� O �0000000.0-00.00000Q'o0000 6O // // / � � OOOO�.tfOOlO000Q_0-60000 6�00, > 0Q'000000o0,e66--6b00o O 0,0000009 0.600000 0O-P -6 �0001'�'\�000001JOCv / y p000OSJQf/ 0�2� / / / / / / // / / / / / O Ile le, 0 C Ile loo, lo 99 so�oo 000000� gaa / /' // / // // /��—I------ / / / // /�-.\ I 1 I OO�D600 000 O // / / / / / /�O Il .0, 000 1000 '1�� /' / / /O,aog000 000ro00d o 0 0 o q�000d/� 0 000 Ob�c�oo / _ /1 / loo /6`'0 00 ooz6 '9 / / / -- / OOOGKOOW gga gg0 ' �99% 0 0 00-6 o c/j' / //'' /' / — —/ / / / 1-1 ' / Ile lole -990- 0' 9— -972 /' //' // / // / / /------- -s9.000 / a, Ma 0f/�i' / //// //' 100 / 0 / / i' /+'+ + `�+ — / / /100, / / /+ + + + + + + + / + + 00 �J �.o� g + + + + + + + + + + �000>.00�00�00\/ // / Q�jr000ff 96 / + + + + + + �i� // / / // + + + + + + + + / + {�0000`000�f00�00004 g1.N0Q.0.60\\ + + + + + + —\ / / / �+ + + + + + + / + +I / �- / 000000�� OQ-d00 ,0, / /'-000.00000 - 966 -*—+ + + / // / ,+ + + + + + + M / + + + �� / O/OOOCQOO.150 09 / d000-6000p-d� �+ + + + + + + + + i / / / + + + + + = + + + + t >00 �0000Q.001>/ 6'0 000.0.000� + + + -- �+ + +/ � �/ + + + +�+ � �— � / + + + + +/+ + �s \ORSo9'00/00�/ / ///��J�6`o oo0oje1o000o gg4� + �� / / / + + �,-+ \ +/ + + + + + / / // ///// of / OOAO �D'/ 972' // �OOOOOP%000 + �� + / + + +� + + / + + + + +/ + / // i / �g Q Cf00cl- + + + g62I + + + + �+_ / +/+�+ + + // + + + + + +/� / / / + + , r + + + + + �- — + + + +� , —fir \ \ / �,� + + ++ + �� , / g + + + / + + + + + + + / / + + + + —Oe + + + + / + + + + + + + +> / // / +///+/+ ++ + 71� ++++ +++++++++ 974-- 0)/ ++ _f + 1-, '000, '00", "0' 100, ---972-- // / / goo ++ / / +++ / / //// // COOR[�ITE-6VERK ++++++ / / / + +`+++++ 6 9 / / / // — -WIRE 91 A6�TAL QRr + + + + \ / � + + + + . + + p p� o�rO / / WITH 54 2 + + + + / — / + + + + + \o�rO /'00, — — — — I�fIL9'61A OWNER_ h a a �/° < a a + + + + + � / + + + + + + + + + 110, d 4 d 4 4 d + + + %+ + + + + + + + + + + + 4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + q'� 4 4 4 4 4/ / / �O / i/ 960 0� ara a a a a �a as ate_++++++ / ++++ + \ +\ \+� / / / / �^ /�1 / / 01 a -0e a a + — — a a9�°/< a� a a BASIN 1�+ + + + + + / + + + + + ++ 9 ++/+++ BOT1950Q+ + +++ ++++-/ /fT a `OUT=951++++ + + ++ + + WL=953.7\/ ++ <aay0 0Onro 000 / +/+ a a O Oo 0 �++ U U15C) 00O / + a +/ 000o 000 000o0+++ a 0001 + + ' 00�� N �ooU 95z 952 _r/� ++/bLAUQ0 NORTH ARM LANE/ 0 950 + + ++++ 000 00�00�5 + +++ + + / + a S / o 000 0000�00 +�++ + + /++++ + ++++++�++++++lor ++2 1 BASIN + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ + 0 0v0 00 00 00 `o0�>o0\ \ \ / / 000 + + + + +�+000000O+ + + + + + + + + + 0000000 b + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0 0000oop ob�o+OUT=953.5 -mLi ++ � + + + ++ + .\0 �+ nwp / II/ / + + +\ + + \+ + \ +++ + 000000000+ + + + + +/++ ++\ ++++000 0000 000000 '+++ ++ \ 0000 00 00 ++/+ ++ +++/++ + k V00010 0 0000 o�Oo+/+++/+ ++ ++ ++/+ / 0o000 �oY +/+ +1++++ \ \ \\\\ \ \ \ \ + + + + +++14 + +le \ \ \ \ \\ ° / +'+++ + + �/ / / + +1+ + + ' i9�`�O + ++++++ /' 1 n +++ � +++/' — </ < g�ti +\\++\ �� I I \ +++ +\+ I \ I \ \ I I I I I / I l / / // / / / �/ / l / I / // / / /r----- ++++++ / ++y / + + + + +� I \. + +]+ +__--- 9 + + + + \ + +/+ +1 \�+�++ + / +++ ++ +/++++ I ++ + +I / / / / / / I I I III III / / / I I I I I / / / / / / / / _ — p ++++ I I I +++A+++ I I / I I I / / // I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 / +++ 1 1 +++\+++ + ++\++ + \ + �— + I \ +++ �V+++ I L— / I I I I I CIVIL METHODS INC. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED DATE / REVISION: ' BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED DESIGNED: KEB 01-06-2025 Permit Submittal Set. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. P.O. Box 28038 01-18-2025 Adjusted Lot Lines per City Comments. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DRAWN: KEB 03-04-2025 Added Cul-de-sac at Entry Turn Per City Comments. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION St. Pa u I, NA 5 5128 DATE: n�_na_�n�5 o:763.210.5713 I www.civilmethods.com I ' I \ / BASIN 2 / BOT=944 0/ 0UT=i_4!'i.8 HWL=945r6 KENT E. BRANDER LIC. NO.: 44578 CHECKED: DMP PROJECT: I DY L LVA L E SHORES PROJ. LOCATION: 215 NORTH ARM LN, ORONO, MN 55364 PROJ. OWNER: BRADLEY J PASS BENCHMARK SEE SURVEY DOCUMENTATION G_"") ° 60 120Feet LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE WETLAND WET WETLAND BUFFER CONTOUR — SPOT ELEVATION x® DRAINAGE DIRECTION xxi _ STORM SEWER / CULVERT >> BITUMINOUS SURFACE RIPRAP RETAINING WALL SEPTIC AREA Know what's belon Call before you dig. SHEET NO: GRADING & DRAINAGE — OVERALL I C500 292 O O 0 U U 0 L O co L U N O c� U r� U �o @ 0 o LL a` \ \ \ \ \ J I I I I\+ + +\+ \ + + + ,� + + + + SEE BELOW -_____- \ 21 .10' \ I 235. 3' / / \ 1� 24" - +++++ _ + IN o w F ,g -n o \ \ \ \ o 1 I I l I N �,++ ++�+ I 1 \++++++ \ I.,.�. ++++++++++++ + + ++L4EtS + + , � ^ \` 'o \ 0 \ �, /0p1 6, 1 1 I I / I Nt I I \� I \\ = + +` + +� +\ + +ft Vr944.2Q +-+- \298.46 rn + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +- �op �`�o�o� 'o o 0� `�� ,,� oC, \ \ I I I I ,+ I I 1 \ \++++++ 9�- +++ / +++++++++++++., ____ 6 \ O O O\ O \ O 0 \ Lo \ I I I + +C�+ I \ \ \ � + + + + + \ SQ + + +/ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + �Q O O % C, O 0 0- (P + (fl + +++ + 1+ + + + + + + ✓ � + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ��°O°\ \ I ,u� ,u� \ + + + + + + + ,� V + + + + + + + + --+- + + + + + + + + + + O °° �\ \ \\ \ \ C, C, O&\ \� \ \ \ 1 I +++ 0)++ � + \ \ 3+ +�1/ I / + + +/ + + + + + �� + + +942� + +-+ + + + ��O°O �� \ \ \ \ ��p�°O °O(O CP \ I I I + + + + \ \ + + \ 9S + + +/ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \ O O O \ \ \ i� O O O \ \ \ \ + + cfl+ + + + + + + + \ 2 + \+ + + / + + + + + + + + + + + 1 OC O O \ \ \ O O O� pp o 0 Co y \ \ o 0 0�\ \ \ 6, I I� rn + \ + I \ \ yg0 / + +n' 24" FES / 13M + 8 O O O O \ \ \ Q O O C� O �g \ \ + + + + + + + g + + I+ + + �"'�b � / 4NV:944.20L \\ °°-0g000�\ \ \ \\ \\ \ \�°0000000o`O� \\ \\ �O \ \ 1 I \ � 1 \ ++ (_0 + \ '�� +++ 54.5 EOF+ � �y�j, � + + + ,I+ O 0\ O O°� \ \ `� OQ„O \Lo �ObO I + + + + + + + + 5 /+ + + + )I BASK o° o°o°\\\ \\ O�)o `'0 0 \ \ \\ \ �' \ \ \ po 0 o BASINFTI ( L TION) o o t yo / 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ \ \ o O p� O\� `o ++/ 0 + �O O� O O O� \ \ \\ \ \�°0 O°O�O� \ \ \ \ \0 0 p + +\ OJ �U.O + + V I y, f + + + gQO p VVVVVVV 9 / / O O `O C� O O `p Q 6� O U Z+ + ++ A V V ++ + I � 11 �C, PO 0\\ c� 0 0 \ \ o b o \OUT-951. '"`LO O O O O \ \ �O�n n\ n n� \ \ \ p O O d + + + + + o°o°b\°-off \ \ \ \ �6' \Qo� c \ \ \ oo° °off + + HWL=953: o b o to o d. I I+ + + o b o 0 0 \ \ ao \ QQ \ \ VdVgVV �n I / i o o A o C\ \ \ rn� \ o GRADE TO DRAIN \ \ ° 0 ° 0 \+ + + + + rn + + \oo O 0 0 \ o \ c \ \ \ oo o\ + + + +/ o V� V V 9y�• I+ + I+ +� / b0000boo\ \ \\ \ \ \ \\�oo�SWALE/BASINS \ \ \ \ \ \ or�°o°o°�°°� \ + \' N vo o �o j� +++t+++1 / I \°O°O�O°O \ \ \ \ \ \� °O\ z a \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �O O°O°O \ 9 2 96� L7 V VVV 1/ V I 4 +1+ + °°°°°b°°\ \ \ \ \ \�0, \ \ a °o�o� 4 °' V d V V V rn I I + + I 1 b O O 0 �, \ \ o o"� \ \ \ \ \ ogo 0 0 g6 V V V a� + I+ + + I Co �OOsv \ \\ \\ OO�g�1 / \ \ \ \ \ \ bo�poo�� 6 d1 ,n V �o VI o I s ao++l++++- 0 0 0 0 . . 9 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N. 96 rn V I y9� d i + t 1 \ \ \ \ 4 \ \ V V V o to V 95 °' + + + + + t '' li a, \ \ 0 + + "oI FES �\A, oWO7 V Tc oI++I NV.9141-J)0N11\\oo`Prn\ TF=973.5 9S 9g6 Lo + t + + ++ + to \ \ 0\\0000000°C\\ G=973.2 8 + + \\ \ \� `OO o 0 \ �o `� \ \��0Q°Q�°o°o``°-�\\ LF=965.2 �\ I I + ,+ + + \ 1 I TF=1011.5 \\ \ \ �\ o \\ \ \ o 0 FB ogo�o\ \ `� \\ \ ' � ++A+++ \\ \\ J G=1011.2 ! \ \ \ \ opo oho \ \ I 95 + + + / LF=1001.2 ��ti O \ OO \ \ o \ \ \ \ oo`oo�oboo \ ` \ 1 O X ++ \ 10 / O A \ \ o \ \ L \ \ \� o 0 0 \ 1 1 \ �o o, cn �• c� + \ + +to \ \ \ \ \ ° O pp o� ° o ° \ 9 \ I I I °' ` \ rn rn o + + + + + + + + +, + �DEVELOPMENT GRADING d 0 �� �4 \ 1 g ,o + + +\ + + + + 9 + + + \ \ \ 1 rn \ \ 001 0C) \ \\ \ I I I 112" FES I1,/°' \�+,+++ ++ ++++"� + ++++��' +++++++` TO SET HOUSE PAD \ \ \ o/� \ I o0 Icfl I_ \ �ELEVATIOU FOR LOT,5 956 I (01W:956.50� 0' 1,8" F +++� \+�++++� ++++++ + \ \ \ \ \ \ 9 9 I INV:955CB 1.00 � + 9A + + \ + + + + LL �_. �, + + + + 3 �\ \\ \ �\ o \ \ \ \ \ \ \ S�/ I �RM:I 959.47 96p i �Qoe'°a°000'cc�,,�o� \ \ p \ \ \ \ 1 \ ,g + rn 12" S:956.80 �� 9spOS � °o°o off,°, 5., \ � + + + + + + \ s \ \ \ \ \ A I1 ?� N:957.30 O � j o 0 o r, I o a� o 0 0 + \ \ 0j�. 55 o rn o \ \ \ \ , a, I e- -e o Q �o 0 0 \ 9 cp 9 9 o o� o o C)5. )5 �, \ \ \ \ d'S �6 \ \ 0 1 I I I I I 962 O000 `to°o� °01` 9 \9 9�G +++++++ 2.0% �'�$ P \ \ \ \ ` \ \ , I I I 1 Q o00 / S2�S� 5�50 + + + BASIN 2 (INFILTRATION) 10 07 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 1 5.�6 /�� r o o o o o /� 9 ��'T- i 5 �1 96�' �0 0 0000 0o ao SQ . \ + + + �944.0 6 cV v 3 2' 7' 1 7' I l� �dl � o o O0o� a V A V A \ O ++ -H* -944.8 s °o°o °o°dam°o 1•I�WL�945.6 \ p o o �o�oo°o1Ro°o°b� +o + 0\AIL \ O S E_ �I d, 964 0��9�Qo0oQjoO000� \\ \ \ \e O O1 O I 6!e•O �O OHO O + + { + / o� _- g O O O O g �p + + + + + + / // (_0 / 1014 rn , CB 2 - '�o°o °o°d + + + \+ + +��, j - 0 0 0 0 �+ + RI 965.4 -- �0000 o h% 2[,1 . 9' " --i:B 3- �.0. °O!° \ \ % Oi`�S O\ + + ++ -r- + 150 03' / / / \ \ \ \ \ 1 / / 1 \ -RIM: 4.40 \ \o / 1 / 1022 0 \ I I O 00 I o I r CO O / NO / \\ I , cy lc-:) I O (p I O CIVIL METHODS, INC. P.O. Box 28038 St. Paul, MN 55128 o:763.210.5713 I www.civiImethods.com NE:957.0 \ M \ 965.6 (ME) \ 0 945.7 EOF I (o C N / / / \ \ _ \ 9 O to ° i co o`V Op / / 7 / / / / \ \\ \ \\ 96� 8 8g \ o� V VW 0 o / / �� // / / I \ 9) O C / / / /00 v V / / + + + + + + + + 275 F + + + + + + + + �� // / / + + + + + + + + + 1-1 + +�+ / + + + + + / �/+ + + +/ + + _+ + + / + + +ir ++�\ + + + + / 64+ +i / /� / + +�+ + \ / /�+ + + + +/ +�� + +� / + + + + .� + + / �/ + �+ + + / + -- + + , +/+ + + + , + + f/ + + +/ + J -T- + �+ 03 / GRADE TO \ // N ++++++++-+ / / 10, , �/ --I / + + + +� -�� + + + �� / _ice + + + + + . 4__/ / / / /� / + + / + + + + _ DRAIN BA$IN W4 + + + + +� +. / / + + / + + + + + + r + + + ... + .. + + + ,_�+ + + + + + + + + + / � + + + + + +."+ + + rt + + + + / + + + + + + + +/ +++�+ /\ + + + . + y p�Y + + + + + + + + + + +�(� E BASIN 3 INFILTRATON ++ / / /BOT_953.0 �/OUT=953.5� + + , / 2✓24 / HWL=954.7 + +\ .� + + 66 / / / // 1 � � / + // +++ ++/o/ + + + :�,<+ + + + + + + 6 / / / , ++++++� ! + + + + 9 per--� + + + +/ \ 1 q) roo ++ +++fi + +� +++ / /, / /� ^� p /°�q�^�• O� / / //// a / i O� 9 I! / I //I 1 / / ///r����►� O' fl /�/ / /l / / // // / // /// / O qO954.8 EOF �a X 24 rnL a00 000000 aaa �6////INV:944� ++Q0000� $1a 0o000000(,1 p a a -rl+ ,4 'E / 4\ / / .' / qJ UdA o0 00 SEE ABOVE + INY:94�4 s / o0 0 0 0 d 00 0 d 98 1 I l! l \ \I \+ + �j + Ooo000�o0I1R\ I I N1\ IJG + + + + 00000� +\++IWD IS \ \IG tj t+++/ + + + g000000d0IBl71�RS I +;V \000 I 0o001 I I 1 1 1 9400 � 1 ++ ++++ +++ 4 162.74' I \/ \ \ +\ + + + I \ \ \ -\ \ I I I I \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ + +1+1+1 1+1\ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. KENT E. BRANDER DATE: 03-04-2025 LAC. No.: 44578 DESIGNED: KEB DRAWN: KEB CHECKED: DMP DATE / REVISION: 01-06-2025 Permit Submittal Set. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 01-18-2025 Adjusted Lot Lines per Clty Comments. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 03-04-2025 Added Cul-de-sac at Entry Turn Per City Comments. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT: IDYLLVALE SHORES PROD. LOCATION: 215 NORTH ARM LN, ORONO, MN 55364 PROJ.OWNER: BRADLEY J PASS N 0 50 100 Feet BACK PAD ELEV. (0.5' BELOW LOW OPENING, MIN.) HOUSE TYPE (WALKOUT) BIG FB = FULL BASEMENT LO = LOOKOUT SOG = SLAB ON GRADE Lp(X) NO. OF COURSES DROPPED TF LOW LEVEL ELEV. TOP OF FOUNDATION / BLOCK ELEV. GARAGE ELEV. TYPICAL LOT & HOUSE PAD :Xi?.lqn��o]if26"] BENCHMARK SEE SURVEY DOCUMENTATION 17-1 LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE WETLAND WET WETLAND BUFFER CONTOUR SPOT ELEVATION A DRAINAGE DIRECTION X.X STORM SEWER / CULVERT >> BITUMINOUS SURFACE 0 RIPRAP RETAINING WALL SEPTIC AREA 1. The subsurface utility location information in this plan is utility quality level D. This utility quality level was determined according to the guidelines of Cl/ASCE 38-02, titled "Standard Guidelines for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data." Engineer does not guarantee the accuracy of utility locations or that all existing utilities are shown; Contractor is responsible for locating utilities prior to digging. 2. Construction shall comply with all applicable governing codes. 3. Damaged items or property shall be repaired or replaced at Contractor's expense. 4. See erosion control plan and SWPPP for required controls to be installed prior to site disturbance. 5. Contractor shall install demarcation fencing at around septic fields (no grading permitted in septic areas) and at property line as necessary. 6. Contours shown are to final grade. 7. Curb point elevations are at flow line, unless noted otherwise. 8. Maximum grading slope in mowed areas to be 3:1 (2:1 in natural areas). 9. Swales between lots shall be 2.0% (min.) 10. Retaining walls over 4' high require structural engineer certification. 11. See details and note sheets for additional specifications. 0 50 100 Feet GRADING & DRAINAGE Know what's below: Call before you dig. SHEET NO: C501 293 O O U U 0 L Ln O co L U N O c� U r� U �o @ 0 o a` LL �- + \+ V+ v+ - +II 1 + + +) + +++ +++ ++ ++ ++ ++ +SFTSF\ \SF ��i+_+, � +\ ++ \r+++ + + + + + + ++ + + + + + /+ + + + -+ + ++++++++++++° 1 0°�°RIPRAP'-+ + _+ 0 + + \°-°°°++ ++++++++++++++ - + _ + o o ° + _+ _+f31V1� '+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + �o °o°°�°pp°o+++ WE� + + + ++++++++........ ++++++++++LANKEo off\ VERFLO*dB+ + + + + + + + + + +++-++ + + +d\ 0 0 o Q000000 ++ +++ + + 00000�0 + +/+ + + + + + + + + -F + +++�+ + + + + + + + + + + +0 0 0 413M0�+ 0 50 100 o0oo 0000 + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + Feet o°0°6`000,0+ \ + + ++\) 00 000 � \ +%% ++ ;10 o06\ � A �000�0 + + �+ + +$0000ooOo 0°\ 0 �Ao- oo'I +\+ + +\+ + + 0 °�°++ od+0o0°0oE 0 � 0 �o, P0 + +++�+0 b0do 00 0 0\ ' ++ Y v g0o Cc) vw v vo .0000 00 0 0 ++ +v v vi�v 1�0oo0oboo + +,00obc) b++ + +b�°00000 \°°vdv vbo0O0od00o++ °0q o0 R � yv vvv000O� 000o090 °°oobwly vlv v°\ o,\��, 00090°� �00\ v vw�w v\o0°0000 000\ 06 0 \ \bCv v vC, ,a°0°0ooo�o 000\c, �QQ00i vvbvv`v� 0 \° 00 00 v I ovJ v,v v \ I V A \ A \ \ V A \ \ \ \ vv,vaQ \ \\ \ V A\ \ \\ \\ \V A A \ \V A \ \ v v �V, v ,\ ��00000000�),) C)� ?%6 \b)V� 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ V\p0p0\0000\C)&2 Mc,"bod°° °P 00 0 oQ1 I \ 1 V A \ \ \ \ 0 9O C) \ \ \ V A\ \\ I \ \ !cc.)�� IRIP�T I1 tL ES, 11 / \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ `\ \ IIIN�E�' PROTEd-nON + I+ t / + /+ + + + / % % +/ i + / *J / ;+ /+ + / J/ ++I +++ + +fib + ++ + +++ SILT FENCE, MS + + + ` J� +� +++++ Wz� _TLAND 2 + + + 0 \ \ ++ ++++ \ \ + ++`+ + \ / + + + + ++��++ +�y� +\ + fy r \ + + + + ++ +++++ ++++++� SILT FENCE, MS Z.,t:i + + + + + + + \ 0 0 0�0 °QQ a°�°°°°\° ` ` \+++++ °0 0 °ono°o° + + + + RIPRAP �0�0�000°0�0� REINFORCED >-0 O-sZ 0 0 0 + + + + + o°oo��°,°o°o�o�o oa ` \ \ + ++++++++ OVERFLOW / �- �- �o°� 0 0 �0. 0 � v + +\ + -IS �S - '�^0000d000� \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \\ ++++++ROC + `777 SILT FENCE, MS/-- / vSTABILIZES \ \\ \ \ /r I A CONCTION `v A \ \ vR v S172�U ENTRANCE v v v b / / + + + + + + + + / + + / / + + + + + + + + + + +,+� i / / + + + + + + / + + + + + + + +-+� + / i + + + + + - / f/+ + + +/ + + + + + , + + + + + / + + + + + \ EC BLANKET / 0 50 100 -+-+ + +� + / +�+ + + + \ + + + +� + + + +/ / / / Feet + + + + � + + + i + + + + + __++++ +� _ r +++++++� / / ` /+++++++++ ++ _ +�+ i + + + + + + / _ + + + +%1ET+ + �� + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + �+ + /+ + + + + + + +/ / + + * + + + + + + + + + + + + / / + + /+ + ++ + + + + + + + + / / + + + + + + + + + + + + + / + +1+ + / / SILT FENCE,/ MS + +++ +W� / REINFORCED / / / +++++++ + + + OVFRFL -W INLET / + + + + + + +� + PROTECTION + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + It. Sc / + + + + 4. + A/ + + / ++ + + ++ d ++ +// / // ��� / / / // j/� / i / --�+�•+++ dd\+ + ++ + 14+ + Soo/ ov/ on/GToc/rov�0/00`0 .4 .4 / oIOJP/000° + ' a aq�/ bo +++00b0001ol00o000� ++ � aa�a�a-// � / oQoo9o\00000 + + + + I / / 000000\d 01 00A0000d / 0 ooo + 4, + + + / 0000 d 00e0006, 1 I l - + + + / 0�000 000600 l / + ++ +++++ \o0000��\000doo� I I I I + ++ \ \ v, \090000 0000\oo\ I I I I I I I + +++++ \ \ 00000 \V) ,?,0o0000a 000b00�oI I I I I I I II I II I I I +++ + ++ I A \ �V ` \ -4S - S ARJs ++�+�\� 5'�'S++ -� I - I I. A A� A 7 CIVIL METHODS, INC. P.O. Box 28038 St. Paul, MN 55128 o:763.210.5713 I www.civiImethods.com I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE: 03-04-2025 KENT E. BRANDER LAC. NO.: 44578 DESIGNED: KEB DRAWN: KEB CHECKED: DMP DATE / REVISION: 01-06-2025 Permit Submittal Set. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 01-18-2025 Adjusted Lot Lines per Clty Comments. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 03-04-2025 Added Cul-de-sac at Entry Turn Per City Comments. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT: IDYLLVALE SHORES PROD. LOCATION: 215 NORTH ARM LN, ORONO, MN 55364 PROJ.OWNER: BRADLEY J PASS BENCHMARK SEE SURVEY DOCUMENTATION 17-1 LEGEND: WETLAND BUFFER +++++ RAIN GARDEN PLANTINGS ROCK RIPRAP, RANDOM CRUSHED EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, CAT. 20 STABILIZED CONST. ENTRANCE SILT FENCE - SF - SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG - - - - INLET PROTECTION EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES: 1. See SWPPP sheet for additional information; Contractor is responsible for ensure MPCA NPDES construction Stormwater Permit is obtained as required prior to construction. 2. Topsoil, vegetation, and erosion control items installed and maintained per Mn/DOT 2571-2575. 3. Perimeter sediment controls shall be installed as indicated prior to site disturbance, and shall be installed to allow for high -flow bypass or overflow to prevent failure during significant rainfall. 4. Silt fence shall be of type indicated on the plan (Mn/DOT 3886). 5. Contractor is responsible for keeping sediment from leaving the property, including vehicle tracking. Should sediment be tracked offsite onto adjacent street, Contractor shall sweep Within 24 hours. 6. Install silt fence or sediment control log around any soil stockpiles that will be present for more than 7 days (if no perimeter controls in place to prevent sediment transport). 7. Inlet protection shall be in place on inlets throughout construction; type shall be suitable for each phase of construction. 8. Install sediment control logs around rim of bioretention basins immediately after construction and leave in place until construction has ended and site is stabilized with vegetation. 9. Sediment control logs shall be minimum 8" diameter wood or straw (Mn/DOT 3897). 10. Devices shall be inspected weekly and after all rainfall events exceeding 1 ", and maintained as necessary to keep the intended functional condition. 11. Accumulated sediment shall be removed from sediment control devices when J of device height has been reached. 12. After rough grading is completed, and topsoil spread, areas shall be seeded and blanketed (or sodded) within 7 days. Areas not being actively worked must be covered with temporary seed within 14 days. 13. Random crushed riprap per Mn/DOT 3601 shall be of class and quantity as indicated, and shall include geotextile fabric (3733). 14. Seed in mowed areas shall be Mn/DOT Mix 25-151 (3876) residential turf, 15. Seed infiltration basin, bioretention basin / rain garden bottoms with Mn/DOT Mix 33-261, or shall be planted with wet -tolerant "rain garden" plant plugs per planting plan. 16. Prior to planting, bioretention basins shall be covered with hydraulic mulch matrix (3884) or Cat.10 blanket (3885). 17. Ditch bottoms <1.5% and 3:1 slopes shall include erosion control blanket, Cat.20 (3885). 18. Ditch bottoms 1.5%-5% and 2:1 slopes shall include erosion control blanket, Cat.25 (3885). 19. Ditch bottoms 5%-7% and slopes of 1.5:1-1:1 shall include Cat.30 or 35 blanket (3885). 20. All other seeded areas, including infiltration basin shall be seeded (or planted) and covered with hydraulic mulch matrix (3884.132), blanket (Cat.10 or 15), or straw mulch, Type 1 (no straw in basins). 21. Turf shall be installed by a qualified professional and/or per the Mn/DOT Seeding Manual (latest edition), at rates indicated in the manual. 22. Perimeter sediment controls shall remain in place until vegetation is growing / established in all disturbed areas. 23. Erosion during construction shall be repaired by the Contractor within 24 hours of discovery. EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL SHEET NO: C6011 294 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MPCA'S GENERAL PERMIT AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE STORMWATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY UNDER THE NPDES/SDS PROGRAM (MNR100001). All sheets of this planset, as well as the related Project SWMP, are hereby referenced as part of this SWPPP; any related pages shall be revised as appropriate for differing site conditions. Specific reference permit sections included in parentheses throughout. SITE AND CONSTRUCTION DESCRIPTION: This project includes site grading for a new rural residential subdivision in the City of Orono, Hennepin County, MN (Lat: 44.975262, Long:-92.639664). The site work will include disturbance of 9.52 of the 25.35 acres for the construction of one public street (50' ROW) and cul-de-sac to serve 5 rural residential lots, as well as associated driveways, stormwater management, site grading, septic, well, and landscaping features. Approximately 10,000 CY of material will be excavated and relocated on -site, and all areas will be stabilized and restored as indicated in the plans. Riprap will be installed at all storm sewer and culvert pipe outlets. The existing site contains one house and small outbuildings, and is otherwise an undeveloped natural area. No groundwater or soil contamination is anticipated (16.15). The Contractor shall sign the MPCA NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit application as "Operator" and be solely responsible for meeting the erosion and sediment control requirements of the permit. Disturbed Area: 9.52 acres Pre -Construction Impervious Area: 0.55 acres Post -Construction Impervious Area: 1.88 acres Newly Created Impervious Area: 1.33 acres Permanent Stormwater Treatment Required (If >1.0 acre): YES PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT: Permanent stormwater management is required by the MPCA and Minnehaho Creek Watershed District (MCWD), and is described in detail in the project Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) document. In summary, the site has been designed to treat a WQV equivalent to 1 inch of infiltration from the site impervious area. Filtration is planned for part of the treatment, with the WQV increased by a factor of 2 for the area treated by filtration rather than infiltration. Discharge rates from the site have been maintained. Soil mapping for the area indicates a prevalence of Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) Type C or C/D soils of limited infiltration capacity (Soil Map, Appendix A). A low infiltration rate of 0.25 IN/HR is assumed for the site soils. Soil borings have confirmed the character of the soils as mapped. Stormwater runoff from the overall site drains to the southeast to Lake Minnetonka. Runoff flow in the interior of the site is governed by local topography, which is generally fairly steep in the upland areas. Three wetlands have been identified and delineated on the property and are described in detail in the project wetland delineation report. Runoff from the site flows to these wetlands before discharging into Lake Minnetonka. There is an existing overland overflow channel connecting Wetland 1 (upstream) to Wetland 2 (downstream); Wetland 2 discharges at the southern property boundary, with flow proceeding southeast to Lake Minnetonka. Wetland 3 is the open water and surrounding area at the southeast corner of the property. It receives runoff from the additional connected upland on the property, and it is directly connected as part of the Lake Minnetonka open water area. The project site does not discharge to an Impaired Water within 1 mile, as defined by the State's Impaired Waters List (see map). SOILS MAP Hydrologic Soil Group -Hennepin County, Minnesota 3 (24021Property) Pa aasm aamm NQ9910 aa�sm Nanela aa�ss3 aamao aassu aa�p amp qh° WV - 137 N c C/D _ c B C/D c c C/D B/D e S 44° 53' 2 r N as Iwo o a aeslo Map 5rn1e: 1:3,110 ff pdnted at Aland- (11" x SS') sliest. a NnN M - 270 0 1so a�o sa D Mappro]e3i-WebVil ConeromthatWGS84 Edge tla: URN Zne 15N WGS84 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/29/2024 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 4 CIVIL METHODS, INC. P.O. Box 28038 St. Paul, MN 55128 o:763.210.5713 I www.civiImethods.com EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL 1. The contractor shall use phased construction whenever practical to minimize disturbed area at any one time. Disturbed area shall not exceed that which can be effectively inspected and maintained. 2.A 50' natural buffer shall be preserved within surface waters adjacent to construction. If not feasible, redundant (double) perimeter sediment controls separated by 5.0' are required. Special Waters require 100' buffer. 3.All exposed soil areas, including stockpiles, must be stabilized as soon as possible to limit soil erosion but in no case later than 14 days after the construction activity in that portion of the site has temporarily or permanently ceased. 4.The following shall be installed within 24 hours of connection to surface water or property edge: 4.1.Energy dissipation (rprap) at all outlet aprons 4.2.Stabilization of temporary or permanent drainage swales within 200' of property boundary or connection to surface water (e.g., storm sewer inlet, drainage swale, etc.) 5.A vehicle tracking BMP must be installed at the site entrance where haul vehicles are entering and exiting the site, including: rock pad, slash mulch, wash rack, etc. Streets must be swept within 24 hours of discovery of offsite tracking. 6.Temporary stockpiles must have silt fence or other applicable sediment control device around the base of the pile. 7.The Contractor shall be responsible to control sediment -laden surface water from leaving site. All mobilized sediment that has left the construction zone shall be collected by the contractor and properly disposed of at no additional cost to the owner. 8.Any fines levied due to inadequate erosion or sediment control practices, sediment discharging from the site, etc., shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. 9.Inlets shall be protected from sediment at all times, with appropriate protection installed for each phase of development. 10. Infiltration / filtration basins shall not be excavated to final grade until contributing drainage area has been fully stabilized, unless rigorous measures are incorporated to keep sediment from draining to the basins (16.4). 11. When excavating to within 3' of final grade of infiltration / filtration system, areas shall be staked to ensure vehicles and equipment do not compact the soil. 12. Adjacent roads must be inspected and kept clear of sediment; roads to be swept within 24 hours of tracked sediment discovery. 13. Additional temporary BMPs may be required to reduce the potential for sediment transport during construction. If deemed necessary by onsite personnel, Engineer or Owner shall be contacted immediately for approval or guidance, if available. Otherwise best judgment shall be used to provide rapid stabilization or sediment controls as necessary to minimize potential pollutant discharge. CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE & PHASING 1.Install perimeter silt fence / sediment logs, and construction entrance as shown prior to site disturbance. 2.Complete soil stripping and rough grading of site. 3.Install bioretention areas and outlet means. 4.lnstall pavement and curbing as indicated. 5.Replace topsoil and establish vegetative cover. 6.Complete site restoration and final stabilization measures (remove temporary controls after construction acitivity has ceased and vegetation is established). 7.Submit Notice of Termination (NOT) to MPCA within 30 days. DEWATERING & BASIN DRAINING 1. Dewatering water, if necessary, must be discharged to a sediment control device (e.g., sediment basin or trap, filter bag, etc.) to prevent sediment -laden water with visual turbidity from discharging downstream. To the extent feasible, use well -vegetated upland areas of the site to infiltrate dewatering water before discharge. Contractor must visually check and photograph the discharge at the beginning and at least once every 24 hours of operation. 2.If nuisance conditions result from the discharge (e.g., cloudy or opaque water, oil film, erosion, etc.), Contractor must cease dewatering and correct the situation immediately. 3.If discharge water contains oil or grease, an oil -water separation or filtration device shall be used prior to discharge. 4.Use appropriate energy dissipation measures on all discharges to prevent erosion at discharge outlet. Discharge must not cause nuisance or erosive conditions to downstream properties or receiving channels. Excessive inundation of downstream wetlands is not permitted (if applicable). 5.If filters with backwash water are used, all backwash water must be hauled offsite for disposal, returned to the beginning of the treatment process, or incorporated into the site in a manner not causing erosion. DOWNSTREAM SURFACE WATERS AND WETLANDS 00 -,THE ENTIRE -- SITE DRAINS TO LAKES - ,;� f MINNETONKA �! NORTH ARM, J WHICH DOES fi. n ,I NOT HAVE ANY CONSTRUCTION RELATED IMPAIRMENTS. ul STUBBS BAY a1 AND FOREST LAKE (BOTH "IMPAIRED) ARE WITHIN 1.0 MILE BUT THE PROJECT SITE DOES NOT(,I DISCHARGE TO THEM.�� I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. KENT E. BRANDER DATE: 03-04-2025 LiC. NO.: 44578 i \"S491 r.� 17� DESIGNED: KEB DRAWN: KEB CHECKED: DMP EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL QUANTITIES 0-7 PROJECT SITE �- ! 'ly _ _- 0 LakeGl¢ssen -I \ 3 M j14 u% /)I PRIMARY DISCHARGE LOCATION `:.4• >` Stubbs Bay s`- o Alaxwell Bayt 1 Lair ,� r� N 0 3000 6000 Feet DATE / REVISION: 01-06-2025 Permit Submittal Set. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 01-18-2025 Adjusted Lot Lines per Clty Comments. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 03-04-2025 Added Cul-de-sac at Entry Turn Per City Comments. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS & MAINTENANCE 1. The contractor must routinely inspect the construction site and areas adjacent to the project once every 7 days during construction, and within 24 hrs of receiving more than Y2" of rain in 24 hrs. Rainfall amounts must be measured by a properly installed rain gage onsite, or from a weather station within 1 mile of the project, or from a weather reporting system with site specific radar rainfall summaries (1 1.1 1). 2. All inspections and rainfalls > 2" must be recorded and retained onsite with the SWPPP. Inspections shall include: date/time, name of individual, date & amount of rainfall, findings, corrective actions, observed discharge/location/description, any proposed SWPPP amendments. 3. Inspections may be suspended when work is stopped due to frozen conditions. The Contractor's inspector must resume inspections within 24 hours after runoff occurs at the site or prior to resuming construction, whichever comes first. 4. Silt fence (or related perimeter control device) must be maintained when accumulated sediment reaches 2 the height of the device, or if device becomes ineffective (by the end of the next business day following discovery). 5. Permanent and temporary sediment basins, if applicable, shall be drained and cleaned when sediment depth reaches Y2 of original storage volume; complete within 72 hrs of discovery. Must be cleaned prior to project completion. 6. Non-functional BMPs must be repaired or replaced by the end of the next business day following discovery. 7. Inspect downstream ditch / drainage system for signs of erosion or sediment buildup during each inspection; stabilize within 7 days. 8. Contractor shall inspect and photograph dewatering discharges at the beginning and every 24 hours during operation. 9.Inspect vehicle exit locations and adjacent streets; remove sediment from surfaces within 1 day. POLLUTION PREVENTION 1. All solid waste generated at the site must be disposed of in accordance with all applicable federal and state regulations. 2. All hazardous materials must be properly stored/contained to prevent spills or leaks; materials must be properly disposed of perapplicable regulations, including Minn. Rule Ch. 7045. Restricted access storage areas must be provided to prevent vandalism. 3. Vehicle or equipment washing must be confined to a defined area (minimum of 100' from pond or drainage ditch); runoff containing any hazardous materials must be collected and properly disposed of. Defined area must be delineated with heavy-duty silt fence (incidental); no engine degreasing is allowed on -site. 4. Pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers, treatment chemicals, and landscape materials must be under cover to prevent pollutant discharge, or protected by similar means to minimize potential contact with stormwater. 5. Concrete and other washout waste must be effectively contained - solid and liquid washout waste must not contact ground and must be disposed of properly in compliance with MPCA rules. A sign must be installed at washout area requiring personnel to utilize the proper facilities for disposal of concrete and other wastes. 6. The contractor is solely responsible for monitoring air pollution and ensuring that it does not exceed levels set by any agency or LGU. This includes dust created by work performed at the site; air pollution and dust control measures are incidental to the contract. The engineer may require additional dust control measures to be implemented, as necessary. 7. Adequate temporary restroom facilities shall be present onsite in a stable and secure location during construction operations, and shall be maintained in an adequate functioning condition. FINAL STABILIZATION & NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) 1. The Contractor must ensure final site stabilization meets the Permit requirements, and submit the NOT within 30 days. 2. Final stabilization includes uniform perennial vegetative cover of at least 70% of the expected final growth density over the entire pervious surface area, or other equivalent cover to prevent soil erosion. 3. All temporary synthetic and structural BMPs must be removed as part of final stabilization. 4. Ground or aerial photographs shall be taken and submitted with the NOT, confirming final stabilization measures. SWPPP UPDATES & RECORD RETENTION 1. The SWPPP, all revisions to it, and inspection & maintenance records are the responsibility of the Contractor and must remain at the site during construction hours. The materials may be kept in a field office, onsite vehicle, or "SWPPP Mailbox", or be otherwise electronically available on -site. 2. This SWPPP shall be updated within 7 days to include additional or modified designs when there is a change in design having significant effect on the discharge of pollutants to surface waters or groundwater. 3. Training documentation shall be provided by Contractor as outlined below and required. 4. The SWPPP, project permits, inspection/maintenance logs, stormwater maintenance agreements, and stormwater management design calculations must be retained for 3 years after submittal of permit NOT. Contractor shall provide Owner or Engineer copies of inspection and maintenance logs prior to final payment. TRAINING REQUIREMENTS 1. The permittees must comply with the training requirements as outlined in Section 21 of the Permit. The Contractor shall have a trained individual performing BMP installations and inspections, as required. 2. Training table (below) to be completed prior to construction, as appropriate. RESPONSIBLE PARTIES & TRAINING SUMMARY TRAINING COMPANY CONTACT PHONE DATE COURSE / ENTITY CONTENT OWNER: NA NA NA SWPPP PREPARER: CIVIL METHODS, INC. KENT BRANDER, PE 763.210.5713 1/24/2022 UNIVERSITY OF MN DESIGN OF CONSTR. SWPPPS GENERAL CONTRACTOR / INSPECTOR: EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL INSTALLER: PERMANENT BMP OPERATOR / NA NA NA MAINTAINER: PROJECT: IDYLLVALE SHORES PROD. LOCATION: 215 NORTH ARM LN, ORONO, MN 55364 PROJ.OWNER: BRADLEY J PASS SWPPP NARRATIVE SHEET NO: C6021 295 FILTER LOG -TYPE STRAW BIOROLL (OR AS SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS OR SPEC) � 1 � I b / I YZ' X 2" X 16" LONG WOODEN STAKES / I WOOD STAKE / / INSTALL FILTER LOG / ALONG THE CONTOUR / NOTE: / 1. OVERLAP ENDS OF FILTER LOG BY A MINIMUM OF 6". 2. FILTER LOGS SHALL BE ACCORDING TO MNDOT SPEC 3897 AND INSTALLED ACCORDING TO MNDOT SPEC 2573. PERIMETER PROTECTION -FILTER LOG NOT TO SCALE PERIMETER DETAIL LOG PROTECTION REVISIONS: DATE: BO LTO N - FILTER LOG Created August 201 y ORONO PLATE NO: 8 &MEN K e`gkESHO��' I ERO-005 Real People. Real Solutions. FASTEN GEOTEXTILE� FABRIC TO POST WITH PLASTIC ZIP TIES (3 MINIMUM) DIRECTION OF RUNOFF FLOW STEEL STUDDED 'T' POST 5' MINIMUM LENGTH POSTS AT 6' MAXIMUM SPACING GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, 36" WIDE (SEE NOTE 1) FABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH BACKFILL WITH TAMPED NATURAL SOIL - Z �D 411 NOTE: MIN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHALL BE PER MnDOT SPEC 3886 SILT FENCE - HEAVY DUTY NOT TO SCALE PLASTIC'ZIP' TIES (50# TENSILE) LOCATED IN TOP 8" H Z_ Z w LO o UJ a m N g w DIRECTION OF RUNOFF FLOW STEEL STUDDED 'T' POST 5' MINIMUM LENGTH POSTS AT 6' MAXIMUM SPACING GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, 36" WIDTH MACHINE SLICE 8"-12" DEPTH (PLUS 6" FLAP) SILT FENCE - MACHINE SLICED NOT TO SCALE ttoNo SILT FENCE DETAIL LOG n BO LTO N REVISIONS: DATE: / ORONO PLATE NO: Created August 2018 & MEN K �` ICESHO�ERO-400 Real People. Real Solutions. CIVIL METHODS, INC. P.O. Box 28038 St. Paul, MN 55128 o:763.210.5713 I www.civiImethods.com f----� 3' LEVEL (MIN) 4" OVERLAP ON STAPLES NOTE: ANCHOR, OVERLAP & STAPLE PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS FOLD UNDER 6" EROSION CONTROL BLANKET INSTALLATION NOT TO SCALE %O DETAIL LOG BO LTO N 0 ORONO PLATE NO: EROSION CONTROL REVISIONS: DATE: 'd1 ERO 200 BLANKET INSTALL Created August 2018 &MEN K ESHo�``G Real People. Real Solutions. A L SEE TABLE FOR MINIMUM DEPTH 1' SECTION B-B 4 B o oCpn �rl no -RIPRAP A SECTION A -A RIPRAP AT RCP CULVERT END NOT TO SCALE CLASS II d50=6" CLASS III d50=9" CLASS IV d50=12" DIA OF ROUND PIPE (I N L FT 12" DEPTH RIPRAP CU YD 18" DEPTH RIPRAP CU YD 24" DEPTH RIPRAP CU YD 12 8 3.0 4.4 5.9 15 8 3.2 4.8 6.4 18 10 1 4.3 1 6.4 8.5 21 10 4.7 7.1 9.4 24 12 6.2 9.2 12.3 27 12 6.6 9.9 13.2 30 14 8.2 12.3 16.4 36 16 10.6 15.8 21.1 42 18 12.5 18.7 24.9 48 20 14.8 22.2 29.6 ILE FABRIC, PER SPEC 3733; THE FABRIC SHOULD COVER THE AREA OF THE RIPRAP AND EXTEND UNDER THE CULVERT APRON THREE FEET RIPRAP AT RC DETAIL LOG nn BO LTO N CULVERT END REVISIONS: DATE: ORONO PLATE NO: Created August 2018 & MEN K ERO-600 `AkESHoReal People. Real Solutions. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE: n�-n4-ini. KENT E. BRANDER LIC. No.: 44578 DESIGNED: KEB DRAWN: KEB CHECKED: DMP DATE / REVISION: 01-06-2025 Permit Submittal Set. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 01-18-2025 Adjusted Lot Lines per Clty Comments. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 03-04-2025 Added Cul-de-sac at Entry Turn Per City Comments. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION i HARD SURFACE / PUBLIC ROAD ° SILT FENCE TO TIE INTO BERM OF ROCK ACCESS EACH SIDE s, PROVIDE RADIUS 6" MIN AS NEEDED(TYP) THICKNESS 3" MINUS WASHED COARSE AGGREGATE (OR APPROVED EQUAL) ° ° ° ° E::Z= 18" MIN CUT OFF BERM TO MINIMIZE RUNOFF FROM SITE 1h MnDOT TYPE V (3733) GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED UNDER ROCK TO STOP MUD MIGRATION THROUGH ROCK ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NOT TO SCALE Q ROCK DETAIL LOG BO LTO N REVISIONS: DATE: ORONO PLATE NO: ERO-502 CONSTRUCTION &MEN K Created August 2018 ENTRANCE `AkESHo��G/ Real People. Real Solutions. BACKFILL WITH SELECTED COMPACTED BACKFILL MATERIAL FROM i AS SPECIFIED /�r� EXCAVATION �� /\\j/\/\ RC PIPE �� Bc i����\12" �, ( MIN) CLASS AS SPECIFIED DIA PIPE DIA B SHAPE BOTTOM TO �� 36 OR LESS B + 24 c MATCH PIPE OD, ��� ii i �i i`i ii �i �; 0.15 BC PROVIDE BELL HOLE 42" TO 54" 1.5 x Bc AT EACH JOINT (IF B 60" OR OVER Bc+ 36" REQUIRED) RC PIPE CLASS "C" BEDDING NOT TO SCALE BACKFILL WITH SELECTED COMPACTED BACKFILL MATERIAL FROM EXCAVATION AS SPECIFIED; Bc,.� „ 12 (MIN) B ��� RC PIPE ��� PIPE DIA C CLASS AS % DIA 36" OR LESS B + 24" SPECIFIED 42" TO 54" 1.5cX Bc 0.15 Bc ���� %� ,, ,✓,,.. - 60"OR OVER B+36" 0.6 Bc B L 6 GRANULAR BEDDING RC PIPE CLASS "B" BEDDING NOT TO SCALE �0_p RC PIPE BEDDING DETAIL LOG nA BO LTO N REVISIONS: DATE: / 1 ORONO PLATE NO: Created August 2018 & MEN K STO-000 `�kESHI.. Real People. Real Solutions. PROJECT: IDYLLVALE SHORES PROD. LOCATION: 215 NORTH ARM LN, ORONO, MN 55364 PROJ.OWNER: BRADLEY J PASS PIPE MATERIAL AS SPECIFIED GRANULAR FOUNDATION, BEDDING & ENCASEMENT MATERIAL AS SPECIFIED COMPACTED BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED //\ . OD + 24" MAX N1 12" MIN NON -RIGID STORM SEWER TRENCH NOT TO SCALE NON -RIGID PIPE DETAIL LOG nn BO LTO N BEDDING REVISIONS: DATE: I 1 ORONO PLATE NO: Created August 2018 & MEN K "IArsHu STO-001 Real People. Real Solutions. " DETAILS SHEET NO: C701 E a` 296 E O O U U C U! 0 L Q O O co L U N O c� U c•� U �o @ 0 o LL a` NOTE: MINIMUM SECTION SHOWN; MATCH EXISTING IN STREET 5" HMA TYPE SPWEA240C (2360) TUMINOUS TACK COAT (2357) 0" HMA TYPE SPNWB230C (2360) AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5, 100% CRUSHED (221 1) OTEXTILE FABRIC, Mn/DOT TYPE 5 �JBGRADE PREPARATION / SUITABLE BORROW (2112) ASPHALT PAVEMENT SECTION R2-5/8" --�\ �6 //-- R 1 /2" dJ_� a 6„ 3/4" d PER Fool 13.5" d a. a a a 7�� d d d Q d 4 12" 7-3/8" CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, B612 BASIN VEGETATION: INSTALL WET -TOLERANT "RAIN GARDEN" NATIVE SEED MIX (Mn/DOT MIX 33-261 OR EQ) REPLACE TOPSOIL (4" MIN), SOD OR SEED & MULCH IN GRADED AREAS INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG OUTSIDE PLANTING ZONE SEE PLAN AROUND BASIN 0TTOM AFTER FOR BOT. CONTOUR ESTABLISHING I AL GRADE INSTALL EROSION CONTROL DEPTH TO BLANKET, CAT 0 (3885), OR OVERFLOW VARIES HYDROMULC 3 MAX, ITI-1TI-il 1 SLOPE SUBCUT 6", TILL SUBGRADE TO - DEPTH OF 12"-18". INSTALL 6" (MIN.) FILTER TOPSOIL BORROW, Mn/DOT MIX 3877.2F) TO GRADE INFILTRATION BASIN A B C D BASIN 1 4. 0' 8.0' 954.2 0. 5' BASIN 2 3. 0' 6. 0' 945.7 0. 5' BASIN 3 3. 0' 6. 0' 954.8 0. 5' BERM ELEV=C+D GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYIV PE (3733) TRENCH IN 6" MIN, AT TOP EDGE B 12" A MIN. D 12" MIN. NOTE: RIPRAP TO BE PLACED TO PROVIDE A DEFINED WEIR AREA, TRENCHED IN A MIN. OF 12", WITH DOWNSTREAM SIDE BOWLED SLIGHTLY FOR ENERGY DISSIPATION REPLACE TOPSOIL (6" MIN), SOD OR SEED & MULCH IN GRADED AREAS OUTSIDE PLANTING ZONE 15" (MIN.) FILTER TOPSOIL BORROW (Mn/DOT MIX 3877.2F) PLANTING ALTERNATE: INSTALL NATIVE PLANT PLUGS (SIZE 2") FROM LIST (OR SIMILAR) SPACED PER SUPPLIER INSTRUCTIONS SEE PLAN DEPTH TO OVERFLOW VARIES 3 MAX. if 1 '-,I 0 P F B 0 F LTRAT O N BASIN 3" x 3" OPENIN (MIN OUTLET PIPE NOTES: 1. PROVIDE POURED CO INVERTS. 2. GROUT LIFT HOLES. NATIVE SEED MIX (OR PLANTS) AS SPECIFIED, INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, CAT 0 (3885) 12 I I OR 1.5" CLEAR, WASHED ROCK OR -I X<:D _ I 1.5 -3.0 WASHED STORAGE ROCK w, iI (AASHTO NO. 2) 4" PVC UNDERDRAIN (3245), NO SOCK, 3" HOLES POINTED DOWN NON -WOVEN DRAINAGE FABRIC, TYPE 1 (3733) (US 10ONW, OR EQ) AROUND STORAGE ROCK "1BLY -1/2" STAINLESS TEEL ANCHOR OLTS AND 4" x 4" 4" CLIPS 4" X 1 - 1" SS FLAT BAR RING IECE POND SKIMMER GRATE GRATE, HOT -DIP GALVANIZED 1 91, EL. = 954.5 -I I U 61 " R. 7 I 1-I 1 n 48 d. GROUT ALL DOGHOUSES, CREST 6" - 8" REINFORCED CONCRETE REINFORCED BASIN OVERFLOW EL=952.5 16 R. PLASTER OUTSIDE WITH 6" 5 WEIR KEYED INTO WALL OR COLLAR, STRIKE INSIDE MIN. ATTACHED W/ REBAR DOWELS CONCRETE LEAN �I R GUTTER (#4 @ 8" SPACING). WIDTH cu. YES. LIN. ET. WATERPROOF GROUT SEAMS ' R DESIGN w PER PER 6" UNDERDRAIN, 1=947.5 2" N0. ITN. ET. CU. PD. (DOWNSTREAM OF WEIR) a ��� �� R412 12" 0.0492 20.3 /r 2 3/ R418 18" 0.0600 16.7 8" 0ORIF. ! r r ° R424 1 24'' 1 0.0708 14.1 f- EL = 951.6 :. ..'... •. °. ... 9� R436 1 36" 1 0.0924 10.8 s� r r '. OUT 12 18° PIPE = ° INV = 950.5 EL. 947.5 18" INLET PIPE HORIZONTAL LINE BUTTER EL =946.5 m DESIGN R d CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, R412 CIVIL METHODS, INC. P.O. Box 28038 St. Paul, MN 55128 o:763.210.5713 I www.civiImethods.com I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. KENT E. BRANDER DATE: 03-04-2025 LAC. No.: 44578 DESIGNED: KEB DRAWN: KEB CHECKED: DMP DATE / REVISION: 01-06-2025 Permit Submittal Set. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 01-18-2025 Adjusted Lot Lines per Clty Comments. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 03-04-2025 Added Cul-de-sac at Entry Turn Per City Comments. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 6" PRECAST BASE WITH 2" LEAN GROUT OR 8" POURED SLAB ON 6" COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE POND OCS W/ INTERNAL WEIR AND INLET PIPE PROJECT: IDYLLVALE SHORES PROD. LOCATION: 215 NORTH ARM LN, ORONO, MN 55364 PROJ.OWNER: BRADLEY J PASS DETAILS SHEET NO: C7021 297 _\ \ \ BENCHMARK 00 / / // I \\ // / / / / / _� \\ \ SEE SURVEY DOCUMENTATION N Tr \ I N X e? r XX XX 19 ^x w 2`' „'N a x o// \ \ \ \ Feet LEGEND: ����1j2 I� �.., N X XX X /' / ,' /--�— �/' ' /'// // / //// _�\ \ `\ \ \ 127 N� r.'° X %23z�" X�.•- 2 nr -C >?�!S x N,g� X II' I / / , / /' / / / / /' i / /' \ \ \ \ \ \ PROPERTY LINE In I 4 >4 l ,tip `,h�2�� X X ` O- 0 000 X I / � /' / / / ' / / / / / — \ \ � \ SETBACK— \ J , H X 1' o / / / / / / / / / /� \ \ / \ v _ Xi�. N\°°� °° --�/ // // / //--- / // ///, // ///--- IN, \\ \\ \ EASEMENT ----- _9e/' WETLAND WET CONTOUR Ln \ 6 .68' I �� % /9� ti 04 a �" ` / / / / / / / /' I/ \ I / / / / , \ \ \ \ `\ \ \ \ BITUMINOUS SURFACE 0 x / — _ \ \ \ \ RIPRAP \/ \ N // I \ I IL " In —� //' // // —__—_� I / / -- \ \ \ SEPTIC AREA \ r7J II / / TREE (PRESERVE) -3 8 / / / / // / \ / ' -- \\ \ \ / N / / / / / \ \ TREE (REMOVE) \\ I / GoC4 12, 71T�/;/0060oo/—--/I I a °� °° / TREE SUMMARY: `X�X� / ' / ou�O�O b o o I / / / /' /' '' /'' / — — \ _ / / / / / \ I _ \ X O zI cn I X NI3 V, M; ^ �„ 0 00(y0 000 / _}- / / / // /' // / — �� — �// / ,/ /' \ Nm �I\� 1 TOTAL TREES = 1306 Ali` �i/ ^ N/ /, 00�00 O / M I Ir) / / I // / / // _�-- —// / // \W(n l7 \ \\ \ �---- .._._1 ° �/ �000 / 3 �0 0o0� 00 0 �/ / / / / ' // // //� \_I_-----�/ // / / \ i cm�a 1 \\ \ \\9g �' 000,00 00 // � / / -- —// /— �\ I TREES REMOVED = 420 \ \ \ - ��ooc� / / / / / / -- / I rn /o rn Ilk ' \ p°p2 Tk ^ // 600cao // / ,��� // // /'—'1'--- /�/ / / I I � /04, //// S/TNE/ OF- THE E NLO I / °Ln / — / CC / m 1 /OFT N W- - ___ \ \ X' - Ln ' / �M"107 TJ 87.2%, I�AA Illy ' qk Go _ __ \\\\\ m1\ I'I�\ ��E�\\ \\\ \\ \\1 2./• ti 1 / "$ �/ // / `\0O O O + + /^9 o+ +i++ ++++/+/!+/+ _ + ' � + ' /O / - FENCE-;' /_� i + + X + + + + �Q r +0 +I+ + + +°°° ° + p+X ; +�3N/ff \°Id O 9O OO O + + !� \ I ' Or + + + + + + + 0 In + + + + + + \ \ - $/ / / \�/ / ao —\ o`er m / + + + + + +// "/ rn 9 / / + � + + + + + N O� / / 4k / t0 / rn � / + +p�+ + + Z7 \ X /� / / O + + + + + + /k2 / ki + + + + + + �$ + + + + + / + + + + + + + + + + c� + + + e, / N + + ,� + + + + + + + 964 Crl / cV + + + a' + + + + +/ + + + + + +/+ + + — — v O — —� + + I + / 9/ wGJ �� / t �+++ 0 w M G ,r 952 N +++++ 90 + ++ / / / II / �ji r ++++\ / /' �i CD IN + + 1 / PARALLEL WITH THE WEST / / — —"— ° a a s+j4 a a ° a +++++++ �+ + + + ++++�� /�h �o ,\ti / /� aadaaaaa + M , OF THEE 1 2 OF THE NW ' / ~~~':^�— 9'62--- a a a a a a a a a + + + + + + + + + + + + / �4a4a4p4a4 �a4a4a4 I+ + + + +�/ `` + + �" 4444,,��``4'444f 444444�q� I ++++++ I ++ , / +++ / / F X XX A ada4a4a4a4a4a4a4a' l I +++++ - N +++ " ++ + M + + / XX X I� / a ' rn /� (n I { a a a a 6 a a a I ++ + x- ++ ++ '/ ^}- m m r / - 1� a / 5 0, �oo0 00000 / 9 � > �, X X g000 000 X X. °' / �iZ + a a s o 0 0 0 0 0 0 'n — TTII _ + XX a a as X — X a a a O O O 000000 X XX / ? / a /a / I Q O\o O o o X X �— / X X , N + p ��aa r /// / ° °° 1O OR OOO \ �"V JP.v // = O %< X -r — 4 68 - ` o o o.o 0 0 \ X /� z m,-,� 50 XX M/// / /� Oao o� \000� \ X vS � o::::::: ii€iii»::::: / / 75.00' / N + ^ " \o ON O 0 \ 1 X �/rr� _ --� _I + + �+ -+-� + + + + 1 \ I O C \ ►A d\O O X X cp o / /m 0C , t�� 0 / 4)�b + + + +i+ + + + + + O OOdOO \ » » / 9 . + + fir"' + + + rk + + `: + + + LINE A / / p ���� �m o O X ++e++++gam++ +�++++ + €� ^� ��•�\ �"'\0 � X X" �++ \ + +O 0 O +{ IN 9s\ \ \1 \ \ \^ I �► I I \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \� \ \ \�\ \\\\ \ IN,�6 NO X X +� tw / 00 O w / t o �X8 ++X LO + O z +9q7- cD \ Z 62' N N oc,+ / \\ +++ \ 1 0 `\ 1 \ /22 �j M M + + + ' 57 \ cs I I O I \ \�\\\\\ \ \ \\ z m z N -X +/� + p�0 L I + + 6, L NE PARALLEL WI TH 1�H E I m N'' + + + 2 h 'S9 \\ 1 I EST �INE �F THEE i I l / % / / — \ \ �y868 \z g� .� + + \ ++ \ rn I 1 2 0 THE\NW 1/4 I / / / / //-- m \\ �\ m Do X i'-++++ \ ++ I 1 \ 1 I I / / / i / — _— QR4 N \ m N + + + +� sb9R6' 1 1 1 1 \ \ \ \ggRS —__ -- -- uk gbb 10 + + +w �' I 'o c / , / // o . i o as .9 + + + / I ,z I I 1 \ \ \ \ I I I I l // / C5 / / / l / ' / -- ------ o�` a +++++�'++'�"-—__--- Qa / _750o'�\ + + \ Z ++ �+++ 9� I I I I I / I I I I I I I I I 100 rn + / \ ++ 6I oN I / / / I I I I I I I�m°'I + m 9 � / / / / I I I N� I I + + W 951 / � III / / / 1 + 9 I �z / I I I `trn m 1— Know whats b4L°' + Iz 143.5 I� ao Call ore you dig. /_ CIVIL METHODS INCI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED DATE / REVISION: I DY L LVA L E SHORES SHEET NO: ' � BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED DESIGNED: KEB 01-06-2025 Permit Submittal Set. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION p 8 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. PROJECT: P.O. BOX 20030 01-18-2025 Adjusted Lot Lines per Clty Comments. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION St. Paul, MN 55128 KENT E. BRANDER 03-04-2025 C801 DRAWN: KEB 03-04-2025 Added Cul-de-sac at Entry Turn Per City Comments. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 215 NORTH ARM L N , O RO N O, MN 55364 TREE PRESERVATION & REMOVAL DATE: PROD. LOCATION: o:763.210.5713 I www.civiImethods.com uc. No.: 44578 CHECKED: DMP PROJ.OWNER: BRADLEY J PASS 298 4W N BENCHMARK SEE SURVEY DOCUMENTATION F288 tip 1 12541 #255 #1 �X RnnT RAI I nIA MULCH SOIL BACKFILL ROOT OF ROOT EMAIN SED ROOT BALL HEIGHT ---I\II I L30TTBM & SIDES ISOLATED TREE PLANT NCS BAND & BURLAPPED OR CONTA ER STOCK CIVIL METHODS, INC. P.O. Box 28038 St. Paul, MN 55128 o:763.210.5713 I www.civilmethods.com -"Zy _'� r1t)r7TA P-/ TfEET EXISTING GRADE "T AREA ANT ACCORDING TO �NTING DETAIL "KFILL AREA NOTE: 1. EXTENDED EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL SOIL TO A POINT DOWNSLOPE EQUAL TO OR LOWER IN ELEVATION THAN THE BOTTOM OF THE HOLE DIRECTLY BENEATH THE PLANT TO INSURE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE IN HEAVY SOILS. GRANULAR SOIL MUST BE ADDED AS BACKFILL IN AREAS OF POOR DRAINAGE. FOR STEEP SLOPES I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. KENT E. BRANDER DATE: 03-04-2025 LAC. NO.: 44578 DESIGNED: KEB DRAWN: KEB CHECKED: DMP w + �#1209 1 + +45 AM-1 0 50 100 ++++ + / + + + + + + + Ik 00 + /1236 \ � � / /��� �' Wr�TL�ND 2 + + + + I+ +�- 1238 , \Ji o \ 4, *SEE NOTE \ I o \\ teas I +\ + ET � + + +\+ + + +\T+ + + + + + 11360 6 + + + + + + + \ + + + + \ fI Z77 + + + + + + + + + 0 t_1�- + - 0 0 O+ + + +\+ #1359 \ ,J OHO �O 0 0 + + + 0 0 9_ O O 0 _ \ \+ + 0-.C�0 °OO Q-, a° O ° 341 + + + _+#13bclOp 000om004I�0\ �0�0°0 NO 00 o� 0o o Sg \ \ + + + + + + + `O__o ° ° O 132 \ \ \ \ ° + + + ,1'N& DATE / REVISION: 01-06-2025 Permit Submittal Set. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 01-18-2025 Adjusted Lot Lines per Clty Comments. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 03-04-2025 Added Cul-de-sac at Entry Turn Per City Comments. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT: IDYLLVALE SHORES PROD. LOCATION: 215 NORTH ARM LN, ORONO, MN 55364 PROJ.OWNER: BRADLEY J PASS LANDSCAPING SUMMARY: ZONE: LR-1A RURAL RESIDENTIAL 1 TREE / 40 FT ROAD FRONTAGE REQUIRED: 1,390 FT / 40 = 35 TREES PROVIDED: 38 TREES LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT — — — — DECIDUOUS OVERSTORY TREE STORMWATER SEED MIX v v v PLANTSCHEDULE TREES KEY CITY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME ROOT CAL/SIZE - 38 Honeylocust, Oak, Maple Varies B&B 2.0" NOTES: 1. TREES MAY BE ANY SUITABLE SPECIES OF OAK, HONEYLOCUST OR HARDWOOD MAPLE (NO SPECIES SHALL EXCEED 50% OF TOTAL QUANTITY). 2. DECIDUOUS TREES 2.0" DIAMETER MEASURED 12" ABOVE GROUND UPON INSTALLATION. 3. TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE WARRANTED FOR A PERIOD OF 1 YEAR AFTER INSTALLATION. DEAD OR DISEASED PLANTS WITHIN THIS PERIOD SHALL BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTOR EXPENSE. 4. THE PLANTING DETAILS REPRESENT ADEQUATELY DRAINED SOIL CONDITIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD EXERCISE DISCRETION IN SETTING PLANTS 1"-3" HIGHER IN POORLY DRAINED SOILS. 5. ON 2:1 SLOPES OR GREATER, DO NOT CONSTRUCT THE UPHILL HALF OF THE WATERING BASIN. 6. ON WET, POORLY DRAINED SOILS, DO NOT CONSTRUCT WATERING BASIN. 7. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ADEQUATE DRAINAGE IN HEAVY POORLY DRAINED OR IMPERVIOUS SOILS. 8. PLANTS SHOULD BE SET AT THE PROPER DEPTH WHEREBY THE BEGINNING TAPER OF THE ROOT FLARE IS AT THE SAME ELEVATION AS THE FINISHED SOIL GRADE. THIS SHOULD BE THE SAME DEPTH AS THE PLANTS WERE GROWN AT IN THE NURSERY. NOTE THAT THE ROOTS OF BALLED AND BURLAPPED PLANTS ARE UNACCEPTABLE WHEN THEY ARE COVERED BY MORE THAN 4" OF SOIL IN THE TOP OF THE BALL. 9. DELAY MULCH PLACEMENT IF NECESSARY TO ALLOW MORE TIME FOR EXCESS SOIL MOISTURE TO EVAPORATE FROM PLANTING AREAS BEFORE PLACING MULCH. BALLED & BURLAPPED STOCK 1. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 2. PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING AS REQUIRED, REMOVING ANY WINDING OR GIRDING ROOTS. 3. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL, OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED BACKFILL SOIL AT THE SAME DEPTH (IF PROPER) AS IT WAS GROWN IN THE NURSERY. 4. EXPOSE ROOT FLARE AND SET AT GRADE. REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND ROPES FROM TOP J OF ROOT BALL, CUT WIRE BASKET DOWN TO SECOND HORIZONTAL WIRE FROM THE BOTTOM, AND DISPOSE OF OFF -SITE. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD, STAKE AS NECESSARY. 5. APPLY WATER TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS THEN CONSTRUCT 3" DEPTH WATERING BASIN. 6. WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS. 7. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 8. BIODEGRADABLE TWINE MAY BE LEFT ON AS SUPPORT BETWEEN THE ROOT BALL AND ROOT COLLAR UNTIL THE END OF THE PLANT ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD AT WHICH TIME IT MUST BE CUT AND TOTALLY REMOVED FROM THE ROOT COLLAR. THE TWINE MUST BE TIED OR RETIED TO MID -LEVEL LOOPS OR POINTS ON THE BASKET. USE OF NON BIODEGRADABLE TWINE IS PROHIBITED. CONTAINER STOCK 1. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 2. PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING. 3. REMOVE CONTAINER AND SCORE OR PRUNE OUTSIDE OF SOIL MASS TO REDIRECT CIRCLING FIBROUS ROOTS AS NECESSARY. 4. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL, OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED BACKFILL SOIL AT THE SAME DEPTH (IF PROPER) AS IT WAS GROWN IN THE NURSERY. 5. APPLY WATER TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS THEN CONSTRUCT 3" DEPTH WATERING BASIN. 6. WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS. 7. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. LANDSCAPING SHEET NO: C802 299 AGENDA ITEM Date: March 10, 2025 Title: LA25-000003, 155 Wear Lane North, Variance - Resolution 7566 Presenter: Matt Karney, Planner Section: Community Development Report Item: 22 Purpose: The applicant requests a variance to construct a covered entry within the 50-foot front yard setback. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline: The application was made on January 16, 2025 and deemed complete on January 28, 2025. Following the 60-day review period this application expires on March 29, 2025. 3. Background: The applicant proposes to build a covered entry at the front of the existing primary residence. This residence is located towards the front (east) of the property at a angle roughly 3 feet from to the front setback. The proposed covered entry extends 7.7 feet from the existing home towards the street, encroaching 4.7 feet into the front setback of 50 feet. The property itself is heavily wooded, and the house is adequately buffered on all sides. The applicant notes that the new roofed front entry will address water run off issues from the existing roof. Link to Planning Commission Packet. 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment: On February 18, 2025, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and discussed the requested variance. Commissioners were generally supportive of the addition and the limitations created the the location of the current home. Following the public hearing, the Commission voted 5-2 to recommend approval of the variance as recommended by staff. Link to Planning Commission Video. Public Comment: No public comments have been received. 6. Staff Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Council should move to adopt Resolution 7566, approving the requested variance subject to conditions. Exhibits A. Resolution 7566 B. Site Plan & Elevations C. Draft PC Minutes 300 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7566 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-420 FILE NO. LA25-000003 WHEREAS, on January 16, 2025, Stonewood LLC ("Applicant"), applied for a variance from the City Code for the property addressed 155 Wear Lane North and legally described as: Lot 1, Block 1, Rolling Meadows Third Addition, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota (hereinafter the "Property"). WHEREAS, the Applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a setback variance from the Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-420 to construct a 96-square-foot covered entry within the fifty -foot front setback; and WHEREAS, on February 18, 2025, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on February 18, 2025, the Planning Commission voted 5 to 2 in favor of a motion to recommend approval of the variance as recommended by staff; and WHEREAS, on March 10, 2025, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variance as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: Al. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #LA25-000003. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above -mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. A2. The Property is located in the RR-1 B (One -Family Rural Residential) Zoning District. 301 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7566 A3. The Property is exempt from the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. A4. Applicant has applied for a front setback variance for a covered entry to the primary residence that encroaches 4.7 feet into the front setback. A5. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. VARIANCE ANALYSIS: B1. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance; the requested variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed covered entry still provides for adequate separation from the street and the existing tree cover helps minimize the visual impacts of the encroachment; and B2. Variances shall only be permitted when consistent with the comprehensive plan; the proposed variance to improve an existing and allowable residential use is consistent with the comprehensive plan; and B3. Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls; the request to provide a covered entry with an additional purpose of directing water away from the existing house and foundation is reasonable; and b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner, the Property is significantly wooded and the house is located near the front of the Property, proximate to the front setback. Improvements to the front of the house would be impacted by the front setback; and c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; staff does not anticipate the character of the locality to be impacted or change with approval of the requested variance. 302 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7566 B4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties; economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination; and B5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78; this condition is not applicable; and B6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located; this condition is not applicable; the existing and proposed use of the Property is residential; and B7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling; this condition is not applicable; and B8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property; the existing house is conforming, located 53.2 feet from the front property line. The proposed improvements are intended to solve a drainage issue specific to water entering the foundation near the front of the house; and B9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located; the conditions are not known to apply to other structures or land in the district; and B10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; granting the variance is necessary to allow for a reasonable expansion of the house to reduce the impacts of stormwater on the basement. The siting of the house does not allow substantial flexibility for the applicant to make improvements that would allow for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right; and B11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter; the proposed variance should not impact the health, safety, comfort, or morals of other landowners and residents; and B12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty; granting of the requested variance would alleviate a difficulty due to the existing house location and recurring stormwater issues affecting the house. 303 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7566 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-420 to construct a 96-square-foot covered entry within the fifty -foot front setback, subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 2. The approved project shall conform to the site plan & elevations submitted by the Applicant, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. 3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A framing inspection must be completed within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (March 10, 2026). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 10th day of March, 2025. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: Christine Lusian, City Clerk Bob Tunheim, Mayor 304 to O O 24116REVISED.SCJ 24-116 O - - - - - - 10 I DRAINAGE. AND ; =' UTILITY EASEMENTS I ( I I ---S 89015' 2911 E 349.64 ------ (996.5) (999.3) (1001.0)"- � MI � I pp r`ri : (16002.4) , I /gyp l ,f(f00 3) (1004.8) (1000./_. / 10 a� r10 I �6003.2�� 0 00 1p05.2 OS1 10dy. � / PAV WAJ./ 00 (10.3) (�op2.37 �seJ BLACKTOP 2JI ,s DRIVEWAY (999.3) I (1001.3 O 6l (006.1) fknnn 9) 1Q1 i (999.6) (999.7) 0 1 (998.2) (999.7) \ (999.1) < o EXISTING HOUSE 9 3 # 155 Q� WEAR LN �n 'O n' LE OR f f'. (9993 1 1 F EXISTING DECK � (998.7) n TO BE REMGVED� , 9 J../ 0-- -a a p . /g / CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR REVISION LLC OF LOT. 1, BLOCK 1, ROLLING MEADOWS THIRD ADDITION HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 100��1- - - - - - - - - - ------------------- T 50 10 r BOXESg II J� o1'h ^Op !ems z a ROPOOp (1005.5) �P a.o AVE FOO N � (1p05 WALK t \N G� ON1 yo � �O�iPS�i2._fj •'•"����..... -03.4J FLOOR4" \ LEVEL=- (1007.6) i p039% (1003.1) \ l \ ILA O3 �e PROPOSED PROPOSED \ \ ..•••• 5 Y DECK & 0 0 20 40 k-,_ 80 S C A L E i N F E E T . • •" • • • 8l STEPS �/� :, PORCH ' l�QpO• 1002 WELL L Y/ ` 1001.5 00U, 1 5.3 ••��•��•...•- �Q (998.8) '''' c ) Q Q1-101001.2) +1�C. (998.7) \ 5 USE o AVE $ WALK \�� ,moo LN ••,.--• 03.4) :� ......... _'. Q 5� P ...� •••• i 0 FLOOR �. - • -'' /4/ \ LEVEL= '� ° • • •' ,? \ (1007.6) POSED► . !n03.9�. - 1 -•.•_ \ 1 �I I 1 10 I � 10 i I---------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - O ...N 89021' 55" W • . N . • . LEGAL DESCRIPTION : (per Certificate of Title No. 1438192) Lot 1, Block 1, Roiling Meadows 3rd Addition. o denotes iron marker set • denotes iron marker found (908.3) : denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum --917--: denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum Bearings shown are based upon the Hennepin County coordinate datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, and the location of an existing house, spot elevations, topography around the house and all major improvements, and the proposed location of a proposed addition, porch, deck and steps thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. 1 0S 0 r 1 CA o � o io (1000.9) ` 0 q I o I o � I l9g)8J o o - O 0o I . O I .. O 50 i z a z L0 �z L6 W E,, A z z � a Y a Q J 0 0' z O TV 1 V1 > ; A o ,crv) a O J Wzo W W = z z Z W � C)� a FTr�FF'•'�i ~ U Ll_i D Of a- > CN Q- O CU)� 0 (D 00> - z � �( D co u) E3 U L -0 C # D°'4)0 0 Qc c �' o 0-Jco :� 0 a1 p-, au) N O Q .C) .0 � Q � O V i _ 3 o 0 M z O 0 W f LAKE STREET DESIGN C2. 153 LAKE STPEET EAST WAYZATA, MN 55391 O: 612.462.4000 WWW.LAKESTPEET.DESIGN TEAM: ARCH. DESIGNER: TYLEP INT. DESIGNER: XX PM: XX CONTRACTOR: REVISION BY STONEWOOD 153 LAKE STREET EAST WAYZATA, MN 55391 0: 612.462.4000 WWW.PEVISION.COM THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF LAKE STREET DESIGN CO. AND IS ONLY TO BE USED FOP THE PROJECT & SITE IDENTIFIED HEREIN. IT IS NOT TO BE USED ON ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM LAKE STREET DESIGN CO. z O z Ln Ln Ln = z O o z a O z Q LU w z � z o w o Ln O U C�L Q r-- SHEET LIST Ao SITE PLAN Al FLOOR PLANS A2 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. ORIGINATION DATE 11/21/2024 REVISION DATE 11/21/2024 PERMIT SET SITE PLAN SHEET NO. AO JOHNSON 305 DUE TO UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS OF REMODELS & ADDITIONS, DISCREPANCIES MAY OCCUR BETWEEN INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THESE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE REQUIRED WITHOUT SIGN -OFF TO MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. SHOULD MODIFICATIONS RESULT IN INCREASED COST TO PROJECT, CUSTOMER WILL BE NOTIFIED. EXISTING FRONT STOOP PLAN SCALE:1/4"= 1'-0" J ILJIVC rLLILIK, KIJCKJ, of I KCHVJ PROPOSED FRONT STOOP PLAN SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" NOPTH LAKE STREET DESIGN C2. 153 LAKE STREET EAST WAYZATA, MN 55391 0: 612.462.4000 WWW.LAKESTREET.DESIGN TEAM: ARCH. DESIGNER: TYLER INT. DESIGNER: XX PM: xx CONTRACTOR: REVISION BYSTONEWOOD 153 LAKE STREET EAST WAYZATA, MN 55391 0: 612.462.4000 WWW.PEVISION.COM THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF LAKE STREET DESIGN CO. AND IS ONLY TO BE USED FOR THE PROJECT & SITE IDENTIFIED HEREIN. IT IS NOT TO BE USED ON ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM LAKE STREET DESIGN CO. z O Ln M Ln Ln Z z O o Z 0 ry O Z ry Q LJJ w U, LLJ O O ry Q Lo SHEET LIST Ao SITE PLAN Al FLOOR PLANS A2 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. ORIGINATION DATE 1/27/2025 REVISION DATE 1/27/2024 VARIANCE SET FLOOR PLANS SHEET NO. A I JOHNSON 306 DUE TO UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS OF REMODELS & ADDITIONS, DISCREPANCIES MAY OCCUR BETWEEN INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THESE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE REQUIRED WITHOUT SIGN -OFF TO MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. SHOULD MODIFICATIONS RESULT IN INCREASED COST TO PROJECT, CUSTOMER WILL BE NOTIFIED. (3) 2X10 3 PORTICO FRAMING A2 SCALE: 1/2"= 1'-0" u 4 PORTICO FRAMING j2SCALE:1/2"=1'-0" � VERTICAL PEBAP @ 36" SPACING J (3) #4XCONT. HORIZONTAL BARS #4X2'-O" DOWELS @ 72" O.C. — � MAX (5" MIN. EMBED (2) #4XCONT. HORIZONTAL BARS PROP. EXT. ELEV. - PORTICO SCALE:1/2"= 1'-O" CTED LL PER S .PORT PROP. EXT. ELEV. - PORTICO SCALE:1/2"= l'-O" LAKE STREET DESIGN C2. 153 LAKE STREET EAST WAYZATA, MN 55391 0: 612.462.4000 WWW.LAKESTREET.DESIGN TEAM: ARCH. DESIGNER: TYLEP INT. DESIGNER: XX PM: xx CONTRACTOR: REVISION BYSTONEWOOD 153 LAKE STREET EAST WAYZATA, MN 55391 0: 612.462.4000 WWW.PEVISION.COM THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF LAKE STREET DESIGN CO. AND IS ONLY TO BE USED FOR THE PROJECT & SITE IDENTIFIED HEREIN. IT IS NOT TO BE USED ON ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM LAKE STREET DESIGN CO. z O Ln M Ln Ln Z z O o Z O ry O Z Iz Q w w c./) LLJ O O ry Q Lo SHEET LIST Ao SITE PLAN Al FLOOR PLANS A2 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. ORIGINATION DATE 1/27/2025 REVISION DATE 1/27/2024 VARIANCE SET PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. SHEET NO. Az JOHNSON 307 to O O 24116REVISED.SCJ 24-116 O - - - - - - 10 I DRAINAGE. AND ; =' UTILITY EASEMENTS I ( I I ---S 89015' 2911 E 349.64 ------ (996.5) (999.3) (1001.0)"- � MI � I pp r`ri : (16002.4) , I /gyp l ,f(f00 3) (1004.8) (1000./_. / 10 a� r10 I �6003.2�� 0 00 1p05.2 OS1 10dy. � / PAV WAJ./ 00 (10.3) (�op2.37 �seJ BLACKTOP 2JI ,s DRIVEWAY (999.3) I (1001.3 O 6l (006.1) fknnn 9) 1Q1 i (999.6) (999.7) 0 1 (998.2) (999.7) \ (999.1) < o EXISTING HOUSE 9 3 # 155 Q� WEAR LN �n 'O n' LE OR f f'. (9993 1 1 F EXISTING DECK � (998.7) n TO BE REMGVED� , 9 J../ 0-- -a a p . /g / CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR REVISION LLC OF LOT. 1, BLOCK 1, ROLLING MEADOWS THIRD ADDITION HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 100��1- - - - - - - - - - ------------------- T 50 10 r BOXESg II J� o1'h ^Op !ems z a ROPOOp (1005.5) �P a.o AVE FOO N � (1p05 WALK t \N G� ON1 yo � �O�iPS�i2._fj •'•"����..... -03.4J FLOOR4" \ LEVEL=- (1007.6) i p039% (1003.1) \ l \ ILA O3 �e PROPOSED PROPOSED \ \ ..•••• 5 Y DECK & 0 0 20 40 k-,_ 80 S C A L E i N F E E T . • •" • • • 8l STEPS �/� :, PORCH ' l�QpO• 1002 WELL L Y/ ` 1001.5 00U, 1 5.3 ••��•��•...•- �Q (998.8) '''' c ) Q Q1-101001.2) +1�C. (998.7) \ 5 USE o AVE $ WALK \�� ,moo LN ••,.--• 03.4) :� ......... _'. Q 5� P ...� •••• i 0 FLOOR �. - • -'' /4/ \ LEVEL= '� ° • • •' ,? \ (1007.6) POSED► . !n03.9�. - 1 -•.•_ \ 1 �I I 1 10 I � 10 i I---------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - O ...N 89021' 55" W • . N . • . LEGAL DESCRIPTION : (per Certificate of Title No. 1438192) Lot 1, Block 1, Roiling Meadows 3rd Addition. o denotes iron marker set • denotes iron marker found (908.3) : denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum --917--: denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum Bearings shown are based upon the Hennepin County coordinate datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, and the location of an existing house, spot elevations, topography around the house and all major improvements, and the proposed location of a proposed addition, porch, deck and steps thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. 1 0S 0 r 1 CA o � o io (1000.9) ` 0 q I o I o � I l9g)8J o o - O 0o I . O I .. O 50 i z a z L0 �z L6 W E,, A z z � a Y a Q J 0 0' z O TV 1 V1 > ; A o ,crv) a O J Wzo W W = z z Z W � C)� a FTr�FF'•'�i ~ U Ll_i D Of a- > CN Q- O CU)� 0 (D 00> - z � �( D co u) E3 U L -0 C # D°'4)0 0 Qc c �' o 0-Jco :� 0 a1 p-, au) N O Q .C) .0 � Q � O V i _ 3 o 0 M z O 0 W f LAKE STREET DESIGN C2. 153 LAKE STPEET EAST WAYZATA, MN 55391 O: 612.462.4000 WWW.LAKESTPEET.DESIGN TEAM: ARCH. DESIGNER: TYLEP INT. DESIGNER: XX PM: XX CONTRACTOR: REVISION BY STONEWOOD 153 LAKE STREET EAST WAYZATA, MN 55391 0: 612.462.4000 WWW.PEVISION.COM THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF LAKE STREET DESIGN CO. AND IS ONLY TO BE USED FOP THE PROJECT & SITE IDENTIFIED HEREIN. IT IS NOT TO BE USED ON ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM LAKE STREET DESIGN CO. z O z Ln Ln Ln = z O o z a O z Q LU w z � z o w o Ln O U C�L Q r-- SHEET LIST Ao SITE PLAN Al FLOOR PLANS A2 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. ORIGINATION DATE 11/21/2024 REVISION DATE 11/21/2024 PERMIT SET SITE PLAN SHEET NO. AO JOHNSON 308 DUE TO UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS OF REMODELS & ADDITIONS, DISCREPANCIES MAY OCCUR BETWEEN INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THESE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE REQUIRED WITHOUT SIGN -OFF TO MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. SHOULD MODIFICATIONS RESULT IN INCREASED COST TO PROJECT, CUSTOMER WILL BE NOTIFIED. EXISTING FRONT STOOP PLAN SCALE:1/4"= 1'-0" J ILJIVC rLLILIK, KIJCKJ, of I KCHVJ PROPOSED FRONT STOOP PLAN SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" NOPTH LAKE STREET DESIGN C2. 153 LAKE STREET EAST WAYZATA, MN 55391 0: 612.462.4000 WWW.LAKESTREET.DESIGN TEAM: ARCH. DESIGNER: TYLER INT. DESIGNER: XX PM: xx CONTRACTOR: REVISION BYSTONEWOOD 153 LAKE STREET EAST WAYZATA, MN 55391 0: 612.462.4000 WWW.PEVISION.COM THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF LAKE STREET DESIGN CO. AND IS ONLY TO BE USED FOR THE PROJECT & SITE IDENTIFIED HEREIN. IT IS NOT TO BE USED ON ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM LAKE STREET DESIGN CO. z O Ln M Ln Ln Z z O o Z 0 ry O Z ry Q LJJ w U, LLJ O O ry Q Lo SHEET LIST Ao SITE PLAN Al FLOOR PLANS A2 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. ORIGINATION DATE 1/27/2025 REVISION DATE 1/27/2024 VARIANCE SET FLOOR PLANS SHEET NO. A I JOHNSON 309 DUE TO UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS OF REMODELS & ADDITIONS, DISCREPANCIES MAY OCCUR BETWEEN INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THESE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE REQUIRED WITHOUT SIGN -OFF TO MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. SHOULD MODIFICATIONS RESULT IN INCREASED COST TO PROJECT, CUSTOMER WILL BE NOTIFIED. (3) 2X10 3 PORTICO FRAMING A2 SCALE: 1/2"= 1'-0" u 4 PORTICO FRAMING j2SCALE:1/2"=1'-0" � VERTICAL PEBAP @ 36" SPACING J (3) #4XCONT. HORIZONTAL BARS #4X2'-O" DOWELS @ 72" O.C. — � MAX (5" MIN. EMBED (2) #4XCONT. HORIZONTAL BARS PROP. EXT. ELEV. - PORTICO SCALE:1/2"= 1'-O" CTED LL PER S .PORT PROP. EXT. ELEV. - PORTICO SCALE:1/2"= l'-O" LAKE STREET DESIGN C2. 153 LAKE STREET EAST WAYZATA, MN 55391 0: 612.462.4000 WWW.LAKESTREET.DESIGN TEAM: ARCH. DESIGNER: TYLEP INT. DESIGNER: XX PM: xx CONTRACTOR: REVISION BYSTONEWOOD 153 LAKE STREET EAST WAYZATA, MN 55391 0: 612.462.4000 WWW.PEVISION.COM THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF LAKE STREET DESIGN CO. AND IS ONLY TO BE USED FOR THE PROJECT & SITE IDENTIFIED HEREIN. IT IS NOT TO BE USED ON ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM LAKE STREET DESIGN CO. z O Ln M Ln Ln Z z O o Z O ry O Z Iz Q w w c./) LLJ O O ry Q Lo SHEET LIST Ao SITE PLAN Al FLOOR PLANS A2 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. ORIGINATION DATE 1/27/2025 REVISION DATE 1/27/2024 VARIANCE SET PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. SHEET NO. Az JOHNSON 310 DRAFT Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 18, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 6.8 LA25-000003, STONEWOOD LLC, 155 WEAR LANE NORTH, VARIANCES The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and approve a request for a new covered stoop to control water getting into the house. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff and the applicants, John Daly Stonewood, Wayzata and Ross Johnson, 155 Wear Lane, the homeowner. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 10:09 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 10:09 p.m. Commissioners said it is a good solution to a water problem for a small encroachment in the setback and would not be able to be viewed by neighbors. Several were concerned the portico and stoop would not be enough to solve the water problem, and that a practical difficulty was not sufficiently established. McCutcheon moved, Jarnot seconded, to approve LA25-000003,155 Wear Lane North, Variances, as applied. VOTE: Ayes: 5, Nays 2 (Ressler and Kirchner). 311 AGENDA ITEM Date: March 10, 2025 Title: LA25-000005, 1480 Bohns Point Rd, Variance - Resolution 7568 Presenter: Matt Karney, Planner Section: Community Development Report Item: 23 Purpose: The applicant requests approval of an average lakeshore setback variance to reconstruct an accessory shed. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline: The application was made on January 21, 2025 and deemed complete on January 30, 2025. Following the 60-day review period this application expires on March 31, 2025. 3. Background: The applicant proposes to rebuild an existing non -conforming accessory shed located lakeward of the existing residence to have the shed better match the architecture of the residence. The shed is approximately 90 feet inland of the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL), but is approximately 136 feet lakeward of the Average Lakeshore Setback (ALS). The existing shed is 312 square feet and the proposed shed will be 300 square feet in size, by eliminating an existing bump out on the building footprint. The applicant is proposing to increase the height and pitch of the roof. The current defined height of the shed is 9.2 feet. The proposal indicated a increase in the defined height to 12.5 feet resulting in a 3.3 foot defined height expansion within the ALS. The vertical expansion is considered a new encroachment to the building. The applicant states the purpose of the increase roof height is to improve the architectural design of the building. Link to Planning Commission Packet. 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment: On February 18, 2025, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and discussed the requested variance. Following the public hearing, the Commission voted 6-1 to recommend denial of the variance as recommended by staff. Link to Planning Commission Video. Public Comment: No public comments have been received. 6. Staff Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends denial. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Council should move to adopt Resolution 7568, denying the requested variance. 312 Exhibits A. Resolution 7568 B. Elevations & Site Plan C. Aerial Images D. Applicant Images E. Draft PC Minutes 313 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7568 A RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-1279 FILE NO. LA25-000005 WHEREAS, on January 21, 2025, Schwarz Builders Inc. ("Applicant"), applied for a variance from the City Code for the property addressed 1480 Bohns Point Road and legally described as: That part of the South 800.00 feet of Government Lot 1, Section 9, Township 117 North, Range 23, West of the 51" Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said South 800.00 feet; thence East along said North line of said South 800.00 feet, 430,26 feet; thence deflecting right 12 degrees 06 minutes, 70 feet, more or less, to the shore of Lake Minnetonka; thence southwesterly along said shore line 140 feet, more or less, to the North line of the South 650.00 feet of said Government Lot 1; thence West along said North line to the West line thereof; thence North along said West line to the point of beginning, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the "Property"); WHEREAS, the Applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a variance from Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to rebuild an existing accessory shed within the average lakeshore setback; and WHEREAS, on February 18, 2025, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on February 18, 2025, the Planning Commission voted 6 to 1 in favor of a motion to recommend denial of the variance as recommended by staff; and WHEREAS, on March 10, 2025, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby denies the requested variance as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: 314 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7568 FINDINGS OF FACT: Al. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #LA25-000005. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above -mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. A2. The Property is located in the LR-1 B (One -Family Lakeshore Residential) Zoning District. A3. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. A4. Applicant has applied for an average lakeshore setback variance. A5. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. VARIANCE ANALYSIS: B1. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance; the Average Lakeshore Setback (ALS) is intended to protect lake views of adjacent landowners. The proposed increase in height does not harmonize with the intent and purpose of the ALS. The proposed intensification of the nonconforming building resulting from the proposed vertical encroachment in the average Lakeshore setback is contrary to the intent of the ordinance; and B2. Variances shall only be permitted when consistent with the comprehensive plan; the proposed variance to expand a non -conforming accessory structure is not consistent with the comprehensive plan. The existing nonconforming building can be reconstructed in - kind preserving the us. The expansion of the nonconformity is not necessary for a reasonable use of the property.; and B3. Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls; the request to reconstruct a failing accessory building is reasonable. However, the further 315 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7568 encroachment of the roof volume creates a new vertical encroachment into the ALS and is not reasonable and is inconsistent with the official controls that are in place to protect view sheds; and b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner; the location of the homes on the adjacent properties establishes an ALS where a lakeward accessory structure can only be improved in -kind. The property owner has not established that there is anything unique about this application and it appears that the request is based more on a desire to design the building in a certain manner, and c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; the proposed vertical expansion intensifies the encroachment within the ALS. This is not in character with the neighborhood. B4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties; economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination; and B5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78; this condition is not applicable; and B6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located; this condition is not applicable as construction and improvement of a residential accessory building is permitted, ; and B7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling; this condition is not applicable; and B8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property; the ALS limits improvements to the existing nonconforming shed to be in -kind, only. The ALS prevents the existing building from expanding outside of its existing dimensions; and B9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located; the conditions of the Property do apply to other land or structures in the district. This condition is not met; and 316 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7568 B10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; the owner has a right to rebuild the shed in -kind, preserving a substantial property right. The expansion of a nonconforming building is not a right of the property owner. This criterion is not met; and B11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter; granting a variance in this situation would be contrary to the intent of the of the ALS as a function of Shoreland Management. Although the structure is failing and the foundation is cracking, the applicant proposes a significant increase beyond the current dimensions of the existing shed. The increased mass of the proposed structure would impact the lake views the ALS is intended to protect; and B12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty; staff finds the granting of the requested variance would not alleviate a demonstratable difficulty. The owner retains the ability to rebuild the building in -kind to address the noted issues and not further impact views within the ALS. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby denies the variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to expand existing accessory building within the average lakeshore setback. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 10th day of March, 2025. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: Christine Lusian, City Clerk Bob Tunheim, Mayor 317 1/4" GALV. H CLOTH OVE LANDSCAPE V-6" 12'-6" V-6" -- -----------4------------ -- I I ESAWN20201 ESAWN2020 � I I I I I I I9 I I o o N -Z - N Z W I i w I I I I I I9 I I I I I o 04 N i I o _z 04 z W I W I I I I 1 I I Io I I 1 I� I I I I N o I o C) z _Z_ w U W I 1 C I Io I I ------- X I M L I� I I I ------I I ------ ------=1 j FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" WEST ELEVATION N PLAN NORTH SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" 12'-6" (2) 2x10 RIM JST. 0 M CO V) --o V J \\ M ~ M C r N N N Of W J _ a � W co am _ U07) J fn 1- W W = C) - - - - - �J 0 (2) 13/4"x 93/4" LVL RIM JST. (BELOW DOOR) FLOOR FRAMING PLAN SOUTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEV. SIM. SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" 0 SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" V-6" 12'-6" V-6" -- — — — — — — — — — — — ------------ --�o I I GABLE -END TRUSS DROP TOP CHORD FOR OUTLOOKERS I - U I W Y I 1- O I OO - X(o I N � I I 'I - C I I 0 N x w Z _ .0 can U w a oco o T � � U O C/) 0p 1cV0 n o N � 06 - N W W 00 z O z I W IL Q I I I I �I I- I _ U) I I I I Y I 00 I J � �? I O= X (O GABLE -END TRUSS N� fJ I DROP TOP CHORD FOR OUTLOOKERS I� I --------------- ---------=---- 8'-0" 1 8'-0" ROOF FRAMING PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" Construction Notes 1 General contractor responsible to verify all existing conditions and dimensions, for temporary support and shoring, intrusion security, weather protection, and job site safety measures in areas under construction. 2 Conform to Minnesota state building code, Minnesota state energy code, and all local codes and ordinances. 3 Install all materials and equipment in strict accordance with manufacturer's installation instructions. 4 Provide pricing for complete project consistent with design intent expressed in these documents. Provide allowances for aspects not specified. 5 Prior to disturbing site, provide silt fencing and tree protection fencing as required by ordinace. - Submit description. 6 Protect existing site improvements and utilities from damage due to the work of this project. 7 Strip top soil as required - stockpile for reuse. Do not stockpile any soils within drip line of any existing trees. 8 Dimensions shown are to face of wall (face of sheathing at exterior walls). 9 Minimum header at openings in bearing walls shall be 2-2x10 unless noted otherwise. 10 All connectors and anchors used in direct contact with preservative treated wood shall be approved for this application. 11 Provide adhered ice -sheet from eave to minimum two feet in from outside face of exterior wall. 12 Electrical work is design -build. Trade to secure required permits & perform all work in conformance with all applicable codes. METAL ROOF EDGE 5/4 x 6 5/4 x 8 3/8" PLYWOOD SOFFIT OR GRADE )OOR MODEL TBD DUTLINE OF EXISTING STRUCTURE EXIST. STRUCTURE BUILT ON SLAB- )N-GRADE; PROPOSED STRUCTURE 3UILT ON RAISED WOOD FLOOR) PAINT TO I SHINGLES aL PIERS N BY SUPPLIER I CEDAR SHAKES TO MATCH EXIST. HOUSE ROOFING FELT INTERLAID 1/2" PLYWOOD SHEATHING TRUSSES TRIM AS REQ. 1'-6" DRIP CAP SIMPSON H2.5A AT EACH TRUSS SHINGLE SIDING TO MATCH EXIST. HOUSE BUILDING PAPER 1/2" PLYWOOD SHEATHING 2x4 STUDS 16" O.C. -. 2x10 JST. 16" O.C.- �2" 0 VENT EA. END OF EA. JST. SPACE 1/4" GALV. HDWR. z ►yi g 1/2" TREATED CLOTH OVER PLYWOOD LANDSCAPE FABRIC ]! 6" GRAVEL rr -< < „�F,,,i „�i�,�rr��"r�llll,,, I I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II HELICAL PIERS ►I DESIGN BY SUPPLIER I TYP. WALL SECTION STRUCT.- ADHESIVE TREATED 1x4 CONT- BOTT.OFJST. SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" JAL ARCHITECTS LLC 750 Mainstreet #414 Hopkins, MN 55343 932 2010070 lalarch97@gmail.com Jea ndre La else ALA � Q 01 �rn 0 L0 zL0 U)�QO0-2 � OW3t H o O J 10 =a N LU = a m Q W U 00 Q � PROJECT NO: 24.15 DRAWN BY: JAL ISSUE DATE: FOR CONST. 1/16/25 ADD EXIST. STRUCT. OUTLINE & LAKESHORE SETBACK LIINE 1 /29/25 J Q U) Q SOW z Q � Oil �wz 0 LLw �s O w [)� Fy (/) 0 J J O W3� 1 of 2 318 1 SCALE: 1" = 20' ALL DATA TAKEN FROM SURVEY PREPARED BY GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC., Di FED 12/19/2013. LU _z I J I Y I V m I LU I U) I LU x I O 2 I W I YI J LU r� I W.26 ---- 225.96 -- - — 40.00 1 / i v 24') M (PROPOSpgEp EXISTING SHED (DASHED) � -=_39 _ PROPOSED SHED (SOLID)EXISTING STONE RETAINING WALL - 10 -Uj -----, e u LAKE MINNETONKA CRYSTAL BAY I � IIl1 I � III I I W I 929.4 CONTOUR LINE z I C/ � IIII 287.17 - 50+ ----------------- I nat part oT the Joutn MUMLI Teet oT Government Lot 1, section u, iownsnip 111 Nortn, Range 23, West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said South 800.00 feet; thence East along said North line of said South 800.00 feet, 430.26 feet; thence deflecting right 12 degrees 06 minutes, 70 feet, more or less, to the shore of Lake Minnetonka; thence southwesterly along said shore line 140 feet, more or less, to the North line of the South 650.00 feet of said Government Lot 1; thence West along said North line to the West line thereof; thence North along said West line to the point of beginning. I I I I I I I I I I I I I JAL ARCHITECTS LLC 750 Mainstreet #414 Hopkins, MN 55343 932 2010070 lalarch97@gmail.com Jea ndre La else ALA LU 0 � 0) 0 L0 elf zL') 00 - 0- � 0 3t O O J -N N LU = a m Q W o� U 00 Q PROJECT NO: 24.15 DRAWN BY: JAL ISSUE DATE: FOR CONST. 1/16/25 ADD EXIST. STRUCT. OUTLINE & LAKESHORE SETBACK LIINE 1 /29/25 z Q J d w U) Exhibit C — Aerial Imagery of 1480 Bohns Point Road 320 /RI'F a.' 40 'U11 l' r ! / 1! -V40 . id i r . * . 1480 (Subiet Pro ert ik. - f 1420 (Nei hbor to -North) pr r-7 4- KM 322 DRAFT Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 18, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 6.10 LA25-000005, SCHWARZ BUILDERS INC, 1480 BOHNS POINT ROAD, VARIANCES The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and consider the request for an average lakeshore setback variance that would add 3.5 feet of defined height to an accessory structure on the property to match the existing house but reduce the size of the footprint and hardcover. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff and the applicants, Jack Schwarz and Kurt Schwarz,Schwarz Builders Inc. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 10:42 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 10:42 p.m. Commissioners noted that the plan was to build an accessory building to match the main building and reduce the footprint but they could not see a practical difficulty since the applicants could rebuild the structure in its current dimensions without a variance. Ressler moved, McCutcheon seconded, to deny LA25-000005, 1480 Bohns Point Road, Variances. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays 1 (Brandabur). 328 AGENDA ITEM Date: March 10, 2025 Item: 24 Title: LA24-000066, 430 East Long Lake Road, Conditional Use Permit & Variances Presenter: Matt Karney, Planner Section: Community Development Report Purpose: The applicants request a conditional use permit for the keeping of farm animals in the LR-lA zoning district and variances from the conditional use permit standards. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline: The application was made on December 3, 2024 and deemed complete on December 23, 2024. The application has been extended from the initial 60-day review period for an additional 60 days, and this application expires on April 22, 2025. 3. Background: The applicants' proposal is for up to thirty (30) pigeons to be kept on the property. The pigeons will be kept in an enclosed coop (54 square feet) in the southeast corner of the property, approximately 35 feet from the eastern property line and 55 feet from the southern property line. According to the applicants, the pigeons are show pigeons, which can tolerate the cold and dark as the proposed coop will not be heated or lit. The pigeons are to be kept in the coop and will not be free to fly. The applicants state the noise generated from the pigeons would be minimal, and the coop would be cleaned regularly to reduce potential odors. The keeping of pigeons is similar to chickens and are considered farm animal which require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and Variances from the CUP standards outlined in Section 78- 303(3) where it states, in order to keep farm animals, the property must have the following: • At least one (1) acre for the dwelling; and • At least one (1) additional acre for each animal unit; and • Separation of at least seventy-five (75) feet between the building associated with the animals and the nearest lot line; and • Separation of at least one -hundred -and -fifty (150) feet between the building associated with the animals and adjacent residences. The applicants are the property owners and have made the request on behalf of their tenants. Their property does not meet the first three (3) of the above CUP standards and they have requested relief from these standards. All other lot and building standards will be met. Link to Planning Commission Packet. 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment: On February 18, 2025, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and discussed the requested variance. Following the public hearing, the Commission voted 6-1 to recommend approval of the variance with a limit of 25 pigeons to be kept on the property. Link to Planning Commission video. 329 Additionally, the planning commission noted pigeons were not explicitly listed within the City Code and a text amendment could be made to directly address future requests for the keeping of pigeons. Public Comment: One (1) public comment has been received in opposition to the application, Exhibit C. 6. Staff Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends denial as applied. The property has reasonable use with a single family home. The keeping of farm animal is accessory to principal use and not necessary for the use of the property. Council should discuss the application and determine whether to approve or deny based on the findings presented by the Planning Commission and Staff. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Direct staff to draft a resolution with the determined findings for the April 14, 2025 council meeting. Exhibits A. Site Plan B. Applicant Information C. Public Comment D. Draft PC Minutes 330 4££ I I i WEST LINE OF GOVT LOT S, P - SECTION 35-11843 CD Z 0 J pr 13 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR LOIS M. STURMAN IN GOVT LOT 5, SEC. 35-118-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 0450 EXISTING HOUSE S 89'53'22' W 199.05 (PARCEL TO NORTH) S 88'1r43' W 19a.88 - -=m e E=TW0 GRAVEL DRIVE rI l j L 1 l� EXISTING E ab 043D �{ 4 cil EXISTING SHED ♦~i LINE PARALLEL WRH EAST LINE OF GOVT LO , .VF SECTION 35118.23 f ZI - LINE PARALLEL WITH NORTH LINE_ OF GOVT LOT S. SECTION 35.118-23 r N 88.1r43' E 197.33 NE CORNER OF OOVT LOT 5, SECTION 35.118.23 .... I EAST LINE OF GOVT LOT 5, SECTION 35118-23..'......._........ J LU �\g 0.48 / '♦ LINE PARALLEL WITH 1 (' NORTH LINE OF GOVT LOT 5, t iSECT10N 35-118.23to ...., c 8J \\\ —--s---� \ r 11S9.40 \\ �� S 9S•1r43' W \v EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION That part of Gonmrnem Lai 5, Section 35. TownsNpp I IS North, Range 23 West 01 tl» 51l7 Prkldpat MetldIm described as fagaww Commencinq at the northeast owner of Said Lot 5; thence South on the East the of said Lot 5. a distance of 2223.3 feet; thence West and Parallel with the North Ilse of said Lot 5, a distance of 1159.4 feel to the adult point W bapkWrq of the IyW to be desaroed; thence wrdlnUtrfp west m the last described Doane a dlsLna o! 191.38 Iset ro the YIM fine of aaW Lot 5; mence South on said West Ana a dlatance of 170 fen; thence Eesl and parallel with SSW NorthIlne a distance of 192.81 feat to a point 1159.4 feel West of said East Ana: thafXe North and P2781W with Said East fine a distance of 170 feel to the point of begin". PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION Thal pad o1 GaYanffwd Lot 5, Section 35. Township 118 North, Range 23 Wesi of the Sth Ptfndpal Meddlan, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast oomer of lSW La15; thence South on the Eat line of SAW Lot 5, a distance of 2223.31eek lice weal and parallel whh Um Natth Ana cf sald Loi 5, atmg a Me hanWAPx referred to all'UM A', SEA'llne A' hMng an asumnd boating of South S8 degrees 17 minutes 43 "OV43 West, a distance of 1159.40 feet to the point of begfm of the ppwPertY belnrgq dasodbed, and 'Una A• Uwe temdnstinp; therm 0 dapreas 28 msw7t0514 seconds weal Hong a Alfa paraAM w5h Sam East Ane olGoverrmem Lot 5 a distance o147.78 task Uat7ce South 89 degrees 63 m1nlXea 22 aewpldS WMt S distsnce of 189.05 feet to the West tine of taW Government Lot 5: thence South along SSW West Ine to the =exxtmgion of S ld Vne A': thence east along SSW weetedy esfenslm to of q e : Denotes Iron marker found DLSCRPICN GRONHERG a ASSOCIATES, IN( CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYOF SITE PLANNERS 445 N. WILLOW DR. LONG LAKE, MN. 55M 952-4734141 0 30 60 120 SCALE IN FEET I HEREBY CER""TINT 177E PLAN,"ECIP"13ON, qI RFS'OTIT SCALE wWMEPAREDBYMEORU=ERMYOIREMBUPERNSIQYAND V-30' THATIAMADULY LICEN8PA PROFESSIONAL ENOINEI AND LAN SURVEYOR UNDER THE DIMS OF THE STATE OF Lr1XNEBOTA & DATE ATE I 1 1 1 I I DATE MNL7CENSENmBEA I U9•11U I 1.110 I � 1L—� _ _ -met �. � � ....`.�� _ ,•.%• .— . . mop - | ■ | 332 430 East Long Lake Rd Practical Difficulty Responses 1) The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance: It's helpful to keep in mind what variance is being requested. We seek permission to build an 8' x 8' pigeon coop on our property. The pigeons will remain in the coop and not be able to fly in and out of the coop. The pigeons will eventually number approximately 20 and will be kept as pets and may be traded among other pigeon keepers in the state. While the City classifies pigeons as farm animals, they are more like pets and will be closely contained in the coop. Thus, the variance request is analogous to a dog kennel kept by homeowners and is consistent with the general intent and purpose of the residential zoning for this piece of property. 2) The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The keeping of unobtrusive pigeons that will not affect the quiet use and enjoyment of the neighbors' property. 3) The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties: a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted bV the official controls: The City does not allow farm animals on property less than two acres, and this property is .7 acres. Because the pigeons will be kept in the 8' x 8' coop, the variance will keep the pigeons in a reasonable manner that should not affect the character of the property or neighboring properties. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created bV the landowner: The size of the property lot cannot be changed and is unique to this property. c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the local Just like a dog kennel, that would be an allowed use, the pigeon coop will not alter the essential character of the locality. In fact, the pigeon coop will be less intrusive because the pigeons do not bark or whine as dogs often do. 4) Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties: There is no economic reason for the request. The variance is being sought because the tenants are refugees from a war torn section of Ukraine. While in Ukraine, the father of the family used to raise pigeons for 50 years. He is now in the United States where he does not speak English. While he is relieved to be here and out of a war zone, he misses his homeland hobbies and is suffering the stress that any new immigrant in such circumstances would. Keeping pigeons would help him relieve his relocation stress by allowing him to continue a life-long hobby. 333 5) Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78: NA 6) The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located: NA 7) The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling_ NA 8) The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property: This particular property is bounded on the South and East borders by Wood Rill, which is a 100 acre DNR protected forest, so the proposed coop would not be inconsistent with the purpose and use of Wood Rill. The location of Wood Rill makes the .7 acre size of this property somewhat irrelevant as is bounded by a public nature preserve. 9) The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located: NA 10)The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant: The keeping of pets, even pets that are marginally "farm animals", is a substantial property right of landowners. 11)The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter: There is nothing unhealthy about keeping pigeons. Any guano from the birds will be spread on gardens on the property, which is no different from applying any other type of fertilizer. If cow manure can be spread on gardens, then bird guano can as well without concern. 12)The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty: The land is only .7 acres which is a demonstrable difficulty. Please see the answer to question #4 as to why the variance responds to a real humanitarian need and is not merely one of convenience. 334 From: Susan Thomson To: Matthew Karnev Cc: Dean B. Thomson; Helen R. Hawkinson -Mike Subject: Re: 430 E Long Lake Rd - LA24-66 - Application Incomplete Date: Sunday, December 22, 2024 3:58:51 PM Attachments: Survev 430 East Lona Lake Road.Ddf Hardcover Calculation Worksheet.Ddf Matt, Thank you for your recent email which is helpful. Your email requested us to address three topics. Below is the additional information for the three topics which we would like to review with you on Monday 12/22/24. We provide this narrative with more details on the pigeon coop to supplement our application for a conditional use permit and variance. Please let us know if this email supplement is sufficient or if we have to modify the application form itself. We are happy to follow your guidance. Three topics: 1. "The survey and site plan are insufficient. Using either a complete survey, aerial or a dimensioned site plan, show the existing and proposed improvements. The site plan should be in US Customary units and show all property lines and distances of structures from them." We attach a scanned copy of the survey for 430 East Long Lake Road on which we show existing and proposed improvements. The property lines and distances of structures are shown on the scanned attachment. You will see on the scanned survey that we sketched in the remainder of the house, the driveway, and the proposed pigeon coop. (The old shed which has no roof or floor is already shown on the survey.) As shown on the attached scanned survey, the location of the proposed pigeon coop is located 35 feet from the east property line and 55 feet from the south property line. 2. "Please submit a Hardcover Calculation Worksheet. Note, this property is Tier 2 with a maximum of 30% hardcover." We attach a completed scanned copy of the Hardcover Calculation Worksheet. There are four hardcover areas on the property: House: 1,312 sq. footage Old Shed: 104 sq. footage Proposed Pigeon Coop: 54 sq. footage Driveway: 2,136 sq. footage Total Hardscape: 3,606 sq. footage This property lot square footage is 31,960. 3. "1 read the first page of Email re Pigeon Coop with diagram and photo.pdf as a cover letter. I would suggest taking another try at this, as some of the statements are difficult to understand. A cover letter in this instance should describe how the pigeons 335 are kept and how impacts (i.e. sound, smell, visual, etc.) will be mitigated. " Here is additional information: The coop, including the enclosed fenced in area, is approximately 6' x 9' (this is different from the 8' x 8' dimension we stated in our original application). The proposed location of the pigeon coop is in the southeast corner of the property. Specifically, the proposed location is 35 feet from the east property line and 55 feet from the south property line. See the scanned attached survey on which the proposed pigeon coop is shown. Pigeons tolerate winter conditions well and the coop will not be heated, nor will it be lighted because as soon as the sun sets the pigeons fall asleep. The proposed coop is small in size and not visible from the road or the neighbor's property to the north so the visual impact of the proposed structure is minimal. Here is additional background information: Our tenants are war refugees from Ukraine who reside at 430 East Long Lake Road. They include a father, mother, son, daughter-in-law and grandson who attends 5th grade in the Orono school district. The father started raising pigeons in Ukraine since he was six years old and it has been his hobby for 55 years. The coop he would like to build is the same type of pigeon coop that had in Ukraine. He would start with eight pigeons and eventually keep no more than 30 in the coop. There are many different pigeon breeds, and the type he intends to raise here are like the ones he raised in Ukraine which are NOT homing pigeons but instead are show pigeons bred for their beauty and exhibitions. I've attached two pictures of the breed. These show pigeons are kept enclosed in the fenced in, unheated outdoor coop and are not released or free to fly outside the coop. The birds are quite quiet; they do not screech or crow, but they occasionally mummer and coo. Because the pigeons are quite quiet and given the proposed location of the coop, the sound impact of the pigeon coop is minimal. The tenants have a large garden in the backyard where they grow vegetables. The father will clean the coop daily and any pigeon droppings will be used to fertilize the garden. Using the pigeons' droppings as garden fertilizer was their practice in Ukraine where the father was a farmer growing vegetables and seedlings for sale in the local market. (He also worked for a railroad.) The smell of the pigeon droppings is barely detectable. Given the minimal smell of the pigeon droppings and the proposed plan to use the droppings in their garden, the impact of smell from the proposed pigeon coop is minimal. While in Ukraine, the father was a member of pigeon breeding associations, and with the approval of this conditional use permit, he would care for pigeons at 430 East Long Lake Road and then he will be eligible and intends to join pigeon associations in Minnesota and nearby regions. Members of these associations often trade and exchange pigeons with each other and hold pigeon exhibitions. As stated earlier in this text, the father plans to start with 8 pigeons and would limit his pigeons to 30, trading or gifting away any pigeons in excess of 30 to other association members. 336 As shown on the scanned attached copy of the Hardcover Calculation Worksheet, the square footage of the coop would add approximately 54 square feet of hardscape which is a minimal impact on the total property hardscape. On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 8:50 AM Matthew Karney <MKame cr oronomn.gov> wrote: Caution! This message was sent from outside your organization. Thanks, Susan. Let me know if you need any further guidance. Kind regards, Matthew Karney Planner, Community Development City of Orono P: 952-249-4626 E: mkarneyPoronomn.Qov City Website Allow sender I Block sender Report From: Susan Thomson <susangserveminnesota.org> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 8:06 PM To: Matthew Karney <MKarney(&oronomn.gov> Cc: Dean B. Thomson <DThomson(&,,fwhtlaw.com>; Helen R. Hawkinson -Mike <hhawkinson&fwhtlaw. com> Subject: Re: 430 E Long Lake Rd - LA24-66 - Application Incomplete Matthew 337 L ..t AMR it NAk + ' �i n 1A From: William Bauman To: Matthew Karnev Cc: Jessica Bauman Subject: Comment regarding LA24-000066 - 430 East Long Lake Road conditional farm animal permit Date: Monday, January 13, 2025 9:41:03 PM Hi Matt - Thank you for your time last week to discuss the notice regarding 430 East Long Lake Road. Jessica and I would like to submit the following comments: Dear Planning Commission: We would like to highlight that it is the tenants' burden to show why the Planning Commission should grant a conditional permit. To date, based on publicly available information, the tenants have not explained why they need to house farm animals on a residential property surrounded by neighbors and they haven't explained what steps they have taken to address their failures to meet the zoning and acreage requirements. While we do not have insight as to the purpose of the pigeons which the tenant wishes to house on the property, we have concerns that any animal held outdoors, particularly caged birds, will function as bait for their wild predators, including coyotes, foxes, owls, eagles, raccoons, and opossums that reside in neighboring areas, including the bordering Wood -Rill Scientific and Natural Area. In drawing these predators, the introduction of a new and caged avian species would create unnecessary danger for multiple families with young children in close proximity to 430 East Long Lake Road. We would like our children to continue enjoying the freedom to play in their own backyard without the added concern of dangerous animals frequenting the area. In addition to the zoning precedent and safety concerns, there are other unintended consequences, including, but not limited to, disease, noise, smell, and breeding, that we would request the Planning Commission consider. William and Jessica Bauman - 460 East Long Lake Road 340 DRAFT Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 18, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 6.4 LA24-000066, DEAN & SUSAN THOMSON, 430 EAST LONG LAKE ROAD, CONDITIONAL USEPERMIT & VARIANCES The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and deny the request for a conditional use permit to keep up to 30 pigeons on the property. The property is next to Wood -Rill SNA, an undeveloped natural area, but is deficient in lot size and set back from lot lines for farm animals. Staff noted pigeons are not specifically called out in the ordinances, but the applicant's proposed use is consistent with farm animals. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff and the applicant, Dean and Susan Thomson, 685 Old Long Lake Road, the owners of 430 East Long Lake Road which, is a rental property. They said the pigeons are not named as farm animals and would be intended to be pets and a hobby and not for consumption. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 8:57 p.m. Kim Simensen of Minnetonka said she knows the applicants and keeps chickens on her property and in the four years she has had them, they have not attracted predators. She said keeping pigeons is popular in Europe and is an emerging sport here. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 9:02 p.m. Commissioners discussed possibly limiting the number of birds if the City considers 25 an animal unit; whether pigeons are farm animals; the possibility that raising, trading and selling them create a business, and whether the coop met the requirements for an auxiliary structure. It was suggested the City needs to amend the code around the issue of birds as farm animals. Ressler moved, Prchal seconded, to approve LA24-000066, 430 East Long Lake Road, Conditional Use Permit & Variances, as applied limiting to a maximum of 25 pigeons and that the staff consider a text amendment for farm animals. VOTE: Ayes: 7, Nays 0. 341 AGENDA ITEM Date: March 10, 2025 Title: LA24-000063, City of Orono, Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Resolution 7560 Presenter: Laura Oakden, Community Development Director Section: Community Development Report Item: 25 Purpose: The City is proposing to make minor changes to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan as follows: • Introduction of a new Land Use class "Urban Large Lot Estate", and • Modification of the residential and commercial breakdown under the existing Land Use class "Urban Medium Density Residential/Mixed-Use" 2. Background: The Comprehensive Plan (Plan) establishes Land Use classes for each area of the city. With each residential land use class, the Plan applies a density range, to establish an appropriate level of density based on multiple factors, including surrounding land uses, transportation opportunities, community character, and utility options. Projects that do not fall within the designated density range may require an amendment to the Plan. Currently there is a proposed project to extend sewer infrastructure to a few existing large lots on Lake Minnetonka near the west end of Fox Street. The proposed sewer extension is located within the Municipal Urban Sewer Area (MUSA) and has sewer located in nearby rights -of -way and abutting developments. The proposal will extend sewer down Leaf Street, through a private road off Fox Street that serves the existing lakeshore lots. The sewer utility extension was approved at the October 14, 2024 City Council. The Comprehensive Plan guides this area for a recommended density of 2-acres per lot. Today, the lots in this location, range from 2 - 8 acres in size. Following the guidelines from the Metropolitan Council, in order to extend sewer infrastructure into this area, the lots must meet the guidance of the Plan's Land Use class. The city does not have an existing Land Use category to match the existing conditions. The City and the Metropolitan Council cannot permit the sewer extension until the Land Use classification is reflective of the existing conditions in the area. The proposed amendment would create a new land use classification (Urban Large Lot Estate) with a density range of 0.125-0.5 units/acre. This would reflect the existing conditions for the properties in this area of Fox Street. To balance the decrease density of the the new land use category staff is recommending to increase the residential ratio from 70% to 85% in in the Mixed Use Land Classification which is primarily located around Shoreline Drive in Navarre. The proposed changes will protect the existing character within the neighborhoods, ensure sewer can be provided to environmentally sensitive areas around Lake Minnetonka and maintain the density standard of 3 units per acre through the sewered areas within the city. 3. Planning Commission Vote and Comment: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 18, 2025 and reviewed the application. The Commission discussed the application (Video link). Draft Planning Commission 342 Minutes are attached for your review. Overall the commission was supportive of the application and discuss the importance of protecting the lakeshore by allowing sewer to serve existing properties. Commissioner Ressler questioned the timing of the project and commented that this could be addressed during the Comprehensive Plan Update in the future (2028). The Commission voted 6-1 in favor of the proposed amendment. 4. Public Comment: No public comments were submitted for the application. The City of Spring Park responded to the amendments with no concerns. 5. Staff Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendment to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Move to adopt Resolution 7560 Comprehensive Plan Amendment No.7. Exhibits A. LA25-000008, CPA, Resolution 7560 B. Proposed Landuse- MAP C. Density calculation worksheets D. Proposed Text Amendments to Chapter 3B - Land Use Plan- Pages 15 and 16 only E. Public Comment- Spring Lake Park F. Fox Street Sewer- preliminary plan G. LA24-000063, Staff Report H. DRAFT PC Minutes 021825 343 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL No. 7560 A RESOLUTION APPROVING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT #7 TO ADD A NEW LAND USE CATEGORY AND MODIFY THE RATIO OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL WITHIN THE EXISTING MIXED -USE LAND USE CATEGORY (FILE NO. LA24-000063) WHEREAS, the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") adopted its the 2020-2040 Comprehensive Plan (hereinafter the "Plan") on June 10, 2019; WHEREAS, in the implementation of the Plan, the City desires to adjust land use density within the city to more appropriately serve the City Council's land use goals; WHEREAS, on October 14, 2024, the City Council approved a sanitary sewer extension to serve certain properties on Fox Street; and WHEREAS, as part of the Met Council's permitting for the sewer extension, the City is required to address the density standards for the sewer improvements through a Comprehensive Plan Amendment; and WHEREAS, on February 18, 2025, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning the Comprehensive Plan Amendment were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on February 18, 2025, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment as proposed; and WHEREAS, on March 10, 2025, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the Comprehensive Plan Amendment based on one or more of the following findings of fact: FINDINGS OF FACT: 344 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL No. 7560 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File LA24-000063 (Comprehensive Plan Amendment #7). The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The City plans to provide City sewer to serve existing developed lakeshore lots on the west end of Fox Street. To accomplish this, the City intends to create a new lower density land use classification to reflect the current built environment of these lakeshore lots which range from 2 - 8 acres in size. 3. The City proposes establishment of a new Urban Large Lot Estate category. The large lot category impacts the overall density for the city within the MUSA areas. 4. The guided land use density ranges will be modified to reflect Urban Large Lot Estate (0.125-0.5 u/a), and Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use (10-20 u/a), 5. The City proposes to increase the ratio between commercial and residential within the Urban Mixed -Use category from 70% residential and 30% commercial to 85% residential and 15% commercial to allow for additional housing units. 6. The aforementioned changes, combined, will offset each other and ensure that sewer can be provided to environmentally sensitive properties around Lake Minnetonka, while ensuring that the city will be able to maintain the density standards of 3 units/acre throughout areas of the city with existing sewer connections. 7. The proposed changes will not reduce the City's requirement to provide the required 154 units of affordable housing, based on the number of acres guided for densities 8 units per acre or greater (Comprehensive Plan Table 3B-3). 8. The proposed changes will result in an overall density of 3.1 units per acre within the sewered areas of the City, exceeding by 0.1 the minimum density required for Emerging Suburban Edge communities, as designated by the Metropolitan Council (Comprehensive Plan Table 3B-5). 9. The proposed changes meet the prescribed housing growth for the periods 2021-2030 and 2031-2040 (Comprehensive Plan Table 3B-6.) CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: 345 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL No. 7560 1. Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby approves Amendment #7 to the 2020-2040 Comprehensive Plan attached as Exhibit A and directs staff to submit the Amendment to the Metropolitan Council for approval. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this loth day of March, 2025. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: Christine Lusian, City Clerk Bob Tunheim, Mayor 346 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN Turner Road — Drake Dr z r` JZ T M Moline Road f Painter load I N W Branch Road 0 N N U) Sunnyfield Road EI � I e Dutch Lake Legend Road 151 Kai, 12 Lake . ' Gip - C/as o. 11111� '\, 112 cou", III ■ Density Reduced to 8 - 15 units/acre i e,Qoa ' a MeI. ,b a � a Lake North Arm Jenning's Bay ` III► a6:1 Ast rm 0;3?Harrison 4P City Limits Lakes & Ponds j +t 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams 0 3,500 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT vte&4 /ramBay Ce < Y 0�9. 12 L 0 d Proposed Future Land Use Inset 1 '-ake 9tonka Inset 2 Land Use Classes August 2021 Density Reduced Ito 8 - 15 units/acre BOLTN /1 & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. r1 23rd Ave N Lake YJ zl Rural Preserve Urban Low Urban High (1 unit / 5 acres) Density Density Residential (3 - Residential (20 - 8 units / acre) 25 units / acre) Rural Residential (1 Urban Medium unit / 2 acres) Density Commercial / Residential / Office Island Residential Mixed Use 8 - 15 units / acre) Industrial Urban Estate Urban Medium Park, Density Residential (0.5 High Density Recreational, - 2 units / acre) Residential (15 - and Open p 20 units /acre) Space Map 3B-3a n Dr 347 F-H11111 rat.. s. Net Densit Table 313-4 (Amendments 1-6) ** Edit 1.8.25 for Amend #7 B C D E F G H I Land Use Category Net Residential Ames (NRA) Lowest Guided Density Predicted # ofunits (C x D) 2021-2030 Growth (Households) 2031-2040 Growth (Households) MUSAP,m TAZZone Area A Dumas Urban Media. High/ Mixed Use Residential (8-15 Wa) 25.1 8 200.8 200.8 32 92t Eisinger Flats Urban High (20-25Wa) t0 1 20 200 1 200 50 921 Eisinger Meadows Urban Low Density (3-8 Wa) 5 3 15 15 50 921 Area A Total 40A 415 S 215 200.8 Area B St. Thomas Prop Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (8-15 real 3.69 8 29.52 29.52 10 922 2060 Wayzata Urban Medium High (15-20 nor) 2.51 15 37.65 37.65 10 923 Area B Total 1 6.2 1 67.2 67.17 0 Area C, North Fire Station Area Hwy 12 framtaee Urban low (3-8 uW 1.7 1 3 5.1 5.13 34 929 Area C Total I 1 8.9 26.8 0 26.82 Area D (Sewer extension into large lot areas/ Lake protection) Urban Low Density 690 Brown Rd Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre) 18 0.5 9 9 40 927 740 Brown Rd Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre) 3.18 0.5 1.59 1.59 40 927 3400 Fox Urban Large Lot Estate (0, 125-0.5 Units /Aa 5.26 0,125 1 1 31 954 3295 Fox Urban Large Lot Estate (0, 125-0.5 Units /Aa 4.23 0,125 1 1 31 931 3345 Fox Urban large Lot Estste (0,125-0.5 Units /Aa 4.69 0,125 1 1 31 931 3350 Fox Urban Large Lot Estate (0, 125-0.5 Units /Aa 7.12 0,125 1 1 31 954 3320 Fox Urban large Lot Estste (0,125-0.5 Units /Aa 3.06 0,125 1 1 31 954 3300 Fox Urban large Lot Estste (0,125-0.5 Units /Aa 4.55 0,125 1 1 31 954 3280 Fox Urban Large Lot Estate (0, 125-0.5 Units /Aa 4.95 0,125 1 1 31 954 3250 Fox Urban Large Lot Estate (0, 125-0.5 Units /Aa 5.31 0,125 1 1 31 954 3200 Fox Urban Large Lot Estate (0, 125-0.5 Units /Aa 4.12 0,125 1 1 31 954 3175 Fox Urban Large Lot Estate (0, 125-0.5 Units /Aa 7.49 0,125 1 1 31 954 3125 Fox Urban Large Lot Estate (0, 125-0.5 Units /Aa 7.44 0,125 1 1 31 954 825 Old Crystal Bay R Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre) 17.61 0.5 8 8 31 954 1700 Shoreline Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre) 20.14 0.5 10 10 37 955 1100 Millston Rd Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre) 12.7 0.5 6 6 37 955 1003 Wildhurst Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre) 10 0.5 4 4 1 953 135 Orono Orchard Urban Estate (0.5-2 Unite /Arne) 13 0.5 6 6 53 928 365 Old Crystal Bay R Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Arne) 5.85 0.5 2 2 54 931 Area D Total 158.7 5T59 6 51.59 Area E Navarre Area Green areas were edited to reflect a new land use classification (Large Lot Estates- limits for 2-8 acres in range) 3880 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential 9.37 8 75.0 74.96 1 958 (Hennepin County) (10-20 WO 3890 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 u/a) 0.68 8 5 4 5.44 1 958 3860 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential n0-20 u/a) 0 64 8 5.1 5.12 1 958 3850 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential n0-20 u/a) 0 78 8 6.2 6.24 1 958 3800 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential it0-20 u/a) 0.7 8 5.6 5.6 1 958 3596 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential it0-20 u/a) 0.62 8 5.0 4.96 1 958 2389 Blaine Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential n0-20 u/a) 1 11 8 8,9 8.88 1 958 3574 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential it0-20 u/a) 0 47 8 3.8 3.76 1 958 3572 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential n0-20 u/a) 0 31 8 2.5 2.48 1 958 3542 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 u/a) 0.46 8 3.7 3.68 1 958 3502 Shoreline ,ban Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential n0-20 u/a) 0.31 8 2,5 2.48 ] 958 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential 00-20 u/a) 0.31 8 2,5 2.48 ] 958 3480 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential n0-20 u/a) 0 15 8 1.2 1.2 1 958 3472 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential n0-20 u/a) 0 15 8 1.2 1.2 1 958 3468 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential n0-20 u/a) 0.15 8 1.2 1.2 1 958 3465 Lyric Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (t0-20 u/a) 0 62 8 5.0 4.96 1 958 3440 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential it 0-20 u/a) 0 15 8 1.2 1.2 1 958 Forfiet Land Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 Wa) 0.15 8 L2 1.2 1 958 Forfiet Land Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 u/a) 0.1 8 0.8 0.8 1 958 Parking Lot Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 u/a) 0.86 8 6,9 6.88 1 958 2520 Shadywood Urban Medium Density (3-10 Wa) 2.02 3 6 IT 6.06 1 956 3770 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential 1 (Firestation) (10-20 u/a) 4 8 32.0 32 958 Area E Total 24.11 182.78 38.06 144.72 Green areas were edited to reflect increased residenital portion in Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential from 70%residential to 85%. This additional residential proportion off sets the newly created Land Use Classification for lower density 85% Residential 20.5 155 4 Planned Totals 234.4 723 326 424 The city most provide opportunity to meet its expected demand of housing growth in two terms, 2020- 523 340 Surplus (Deficit) ofhousing opportunities Calculated Density (number of acres/ number of Iota) Affordable Housing. The city most provide opportunity for affordable housing. In Orono, this is achieved by guiding acres at densities greater than 8 units per acre. Orono most provide for 154 units # of acres at 8 units per acre or greater 63.39 *Verify that the parcels are guided for 8 u/a+ Number of units 644.69 348 Comp Plan Change Dashboard Current (up to Amend M6) With adjustments as Density (Units/ acres( 1 3.21 3.10 Growth 2021-2030 2031-2040 1 12022-203(12031-2040 Provided 326 437 326 424 quired (Table 38-6, as amende 225 340 225 340 Difference 101 97 101 84 Affordable Housing(acres 63.39 61.7 Total units 617.59 596.37 Required p units 154 154 Difference 463.59 442.37 The current Land Use Classification decreases our overall Density to under 3 units / acre (2.79) It off set additional density can and should be added into the mixed use classification to more accurately reflect the built enviornment. This increased the City's density to 3.1 meeting the Density requirment and allowing sewer in the large lot estate area to support lake lots and preserve open space around the lake. 349 Table 3B-5 Net Density by Land Use (Amendments 1- Planned Development Area Net Residential Acres (NRA) # of units (NRA x lowest guided density) Urban Large Lot Estate Residential (0.5-0.125) 58.2 7.3 Urban Estate Residential (0.5-2 u/a) 100.6 50.3 Urban Low Residential (3-8 u/a) 16.0 47.9 Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential 8-15 u/a 46.8 374.2 Urban Medium High (15-20 u/a) 2.5 37.7 Urban High Density Residential (20- 25 u/a) 10.0 200.0 Totals 234.0 717.3 Net Density of Sewered Growth 3.1 350 CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan structures 4. Urban Large Lot Estates (0.125-0.5 units per acre) The is intended for areas that have developed in a land use pattern of large lots in environmentally sensitive areas around the lake. These lots have access or sanitary sewer services. These lots are impactful to lake water quality and lake characters. Theses lots are directly abutting lakeshore and would benefit the overall environment by ensuring their connection to sewer and retaining the large open space and green cover within the sensitive areas. Residential dwellings units will be provided as single family detached structures. 5. Urban Estate Residential (0.5-2 units per acre) This is intended for areas that have developed in a land use pattern of lots developed many decades ago smaller than 1 acre, and have access to sanitary sewer services. These lots have a particular impact on lake water quality, and lake character and storm water management, massing, and hardcover controls are critical to the retention of this character. Residential dwelling units will be provided as single family detached structures. 6. Urban Low Residential (3-8 units per acre) This higher density will be reserved for properties deemed by the City Council to be so uniquely situated that residential development at the prescribed density will not negatively impact surrounding land uses. Such properties must have municipal sewer and water available. Other factors that will be taken into consideration in determining the appropriate locations for this density will include proximity to and the need for other urban utilities and services in relation to the proposed use; transportation system impacts and site access; and the ability of the proposed use to meet City housing goals. Residential dwelling units will be provided as single and two family structures. 7. Urban Medium / Mixed Use Residential (8-15 units per acre) This land use designation is reserved for specific sites, which based on their proximity to services and transportation corridors are deemed appropriate for higher density projects. The Mixed Use Residential designation is intended for established commercial areas on higher classification transportation routes to introduce an element of higher density residential. This residential component will serve to augment the commercial uses with a near -by customer base and to provide an efficient use of land. The properties targeted for Mixed Use classification are in the Navarre area, including a number of commercially zoned properties abutting Shadywood Road, and additional commercial and residential properties abutting Shoreline Drive. This Mixed Use designation is intended to allow for the possibility of higher density multi -family residential development such as senior and assisted living, townhomes, condominiums or apartment buildings. Under the Mixed Use designation, properties currently zoned for residential use are not intended to be converted to commercial property, but existing commercial property could be converted to higher -density residential use or mixed residential -commercial uses in the same buildings. The City may also consider new zoning standards to regulate potential mixed -use projects. The Metropolitan Council requires that communities provide a measurement of forecasted employment. Acceptable measures include floor area ratios, building footprint percentages or impervious surface percentages. The City anticipates mixed use within the context of the neighborhood, and not necessarily specific to a particular parcel. Where employed, the City can City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 15 351 CMP Part 313. General Land Use Plan envision ground level commercial services, with 2nd and 3rd level residential, though that is not the expected universal development pattern. The employment and service centers in Orono are very suburban in nature, equating to low Floor Area Ratios (FAR). The City anticipates development and redevelopment of its employment and service centers to continue that development pattern, given the City's goals toward open space, stormwater management, and relatively modest building scale. The City anticipates its commercial and mixed use areas to be driven by retail and service industries, with a corresponding FAR between 0.2 and 0.35. Properties in Area E of Table 3B-4 and Map 3B-4 are the primary candidates for mixed use development. The City has identified 51 net acres of properties that could be developed or redeveloped in the next 20 years. Based on the height limit (30 feet) and the desire for commercial services to mix with residential, the City anticipates-7"1 85% of Area E to convert to residential uses, the remaining 30% to Commercial. Assuming a FAR ratio of 0.25 to 0.45, there is the potential of 418,000 and 731,000 sq ft of building area. Assuming up to a third of that being used for Commercial purposes, that nets between 125,400 and 219,500 sq ft of commercial space, in Area E. Total Sq Ft (Total 1/3 of area for Jobs, Assuming SF * FAR) Commercial 1000 sqft per worker FAR 522,720 172,498 172 0.25 FAR 940,896 310,496 310 0.45 Applying the Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey findings*, in particular the median square feet per worker, we can extrapolate a conservative estimate of 1000 sq ft per worker, based on likely retail, office or service employment, census region, climate, and number of floors. This yields a range of potential employment of between 172 and 310 workers in Area E alone. * Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey completed by the US Energy Information Administration, updated December, 2016 8. Urban Medium High Density Residential (15-20 units per acre) This land use designation is reserved for specific sites, which based on their proximity to services and transportation corridors, are deemed appropriate for higher density projects, but not appropriate for the highest densities. Other factors that will be taken into consideration in determining the appropriate locations for this density will include proximity to and the need for other urban utilities and services in relation to the proposed use; transportation system impacts and site access; and the ability of the proposed use to meet City housing goals. Residential dwelling units are anticipated to be provided as 3-5 unit townhomes, apartments, condominiums, and senior housing structures, no higher than 30 feet in defined height. 9. Urban High Density Residential (20-25 units per acre) This land use designation is reserved for specific sites, which based on their proximity to services and transportation corridors, are deemed appropriate for higher density projects. Other factors that will be taken into consideration in determining the appropriate locations for this density will include proximity to and the need for other urban utilities and services in relation to the proposed use; transportation system impacts and site access; and the ability of the proposed use to meet City housing goals. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 16 352 From: Mike Anderson To: Laura Oakden Subject: RE: City of Orono- Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Date: Monday, February 3, 2025 10:52:05 AM Hey Laura, Spring Park has no comments Thanks! Mike Anderson City Administrator City of Spring Park 952-999-7493 From: Laura Oakden <loakden@oronomn.gov> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2025 1:37 PM To: Mike Anderson <manderson@ci.spring-park.mn.us> Subject: City of Orono- Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Hello Mike, The City of Orono is considering a Comprehensive Plan amendment to create a new land use classification and amend the commercial/residential ratio of an existing land use classification. We are proposing to create a new land use classification "Urban Large Lot Estates" to reflect Orono's existing lot sizes in a specific area. This new classification contemplates allowing a select few of the existing larger lakeshore lots (within the MUSA) to connect to sewer. The size of the lots do not meet the current density guidance. Additionally, we are proposing a text amendment within the Urban Medium Density Residential/Mixed-Use to increase the ratio from 70% residential/30% commercial to 85% residential/15% commercial. Together, the proposed changes will ensure that sewer can be provided to environmentally sensitive properties around Lake Minnetonka and allow the city to maintain the density standards of 3 units/acre throughout the sewered areas of the city. The proposed amendment will not change the projected households, population, employment, or traffic volumes in the city. A map and the proposed language are attached for your review. I've clouded the attached map areas in red; the language changes are noted in red text on pages 15-16 of the attached Word document. The tables are currently being updated and don't yet reflect the proposed changes. We anticipate that the amendments can be completed through the Met Council's administrative review process. However, since the text amendment impacts a land use classification abutting our shared city boundary with Spring Park, we wanted to inform you directly of the proposal. 353 A public hearing for the proposed amendment is planned for the February 18th, 2025 Planning Commission date; the City Council review is anticipated for either the February 24th or March 10th regular Council meeting dates. Please respond to me at loakden(@oronomn.gov by February 18th, 2025 to: 1. Provide your comments on the proposed changes, or 2. Confirm that you do not have comments. Laura Oakden Community Development Director City of Orono Direct: 952-249-4602 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 www.oronomn.gov 354 STAINLESS STEEL LATERAL ASSEMBLY NO FITTINGS ES VAL„EPo,.a wlA OEM NA03.30PO5 0) FLAN VIEW ) E ITI owEa��.o TYPICAL TERMINAL FLUSHING CONNECTION NOTES: 1. SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN TO BE 2" SDR-11 HDPE AND SHALL INCLUDE 12-GAUGE COPPER -CLAD STEEL (CCS) TRACER WIRE & ACCESS BOXES. 2. MINIMUM 4' SEPERATION BETWEEN FORCEMAIN & EXISTING GAS LINE ALONG FOX STREET UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 3. FORCEMAIN TO BE INSTALLED 7' FROM EDGE OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ALONG LEAF STREET. 4. FORCEMAIN CONNECTION TO EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE SHALL BE INSTALLED PER NOTES. 5. SANITARY SEWER SERVICES TO BE 1.25" SDR-11 HDPE. LOCATIONS SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY AND TO BE DETERMINED IN FIELD BY OTHERS. 6. FORCEMAIN HIGH POINT (HP) SHALL HAVE PRESSURE RELEASE VALVE SHOWN PER PLAN & PROFILE VIEW. 7. FORCEMAIN SHALL PROVIDE ISOLATION VALVE (IN LINE 2" FULL FLOW W/ RISER) AS SHOWN PER PLAN NEAR INTERSECTION OF FOX & LEAF STREET. 8. PRESSURE TESTING OF FORCEMAIN SHALL REFER TO STATE OF MN PLUMBING CODE SECTION 712.2 & 712.3. 9. APPROPRIATE SIGNAGE DESIGNATING FLUSHING STATION, ISOLATION VALVE & AIR RELEASE MANHOLE TO BE INSTALLED FOR LOCATION & IDENTIFICATION. THIII a° o E, 11 ^�: a ©&MENK SAN B02 BOLTON �Ne °°- TYPICAL DROP FORCEMAIN CONNECTION TO EXISTING MANHOLE (NOT TO SCALE) 00(1/7J f I� I T P E I II SYS Cis a <-N 71 LEGEND DESCRIPTION PROPOSED EXISTING BUILDING SETBACK LINE ,SC_ GARAGE SETBACK LINE _ PARCEL BOUNDARY LINE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS CURB AND GUTTER — RIGHT-0E-WAY — SANMM SERVICE _S BACKYARD CATCH BASIN CATCH BASIN » » STORM SEWER MANHOLE FLARED END SECTION WIRIP-RAP » STORM STUCTURE LABEL DRAINTILE WICLEAIOUTS c�2 — — — — -0 — — — — —0 SANITARYSTUCTURELAGEL SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE .v> WATERMAIN —I- HYDRANT DATEVAVE \ — —--------- I — — — — — — — — `SUSSEX ROAD I I I I I I I i y j /IN B 4 ill � I � / a =�I----------_ ---- � — -- -- I i 1 fir. s- FOX STREET_ IING NAME NO. BY DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. �gPs W sGR` p XXX 1 MJV 10/09/24 CITY REVIEW COMMENTS- 10/02/24 AWN BY MJV CKED BY a GryP Rg P`' PAP DLS DATE DANIEL L. SCHMIDT, P.E. Date: 09-20-2024 Lic. No. 26147 )-12-24 CITY PROJECT NO. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 1400025TH AVE N#120 PLYMOUTH, MN. 55447(952) 47G6000 ORONO, MINNESOTA 04'. )v, 100 50 0 50 100 200 SCALE IN FEET FILE NO. PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 369IM01 LEAF & FOX STREET UP1 I ANDERSON REDA 1F355 n A S — pM �<OR 11 PE PRbPERN TINE V NOTES: 1. BORE INTO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE. 2. CONNECT WITH LINK SEAL. 3. WRAP AROUND INSIDE OF MANHOLE. CONNECT TO INSIDE OF MANHOLE. 4. FASTEN TO BENCH WITH STAINLESS STEEL CLAMPS. 4. DIRECT FLOW DO WNSTREAM OF MANHOLE. 1010 1000 990 980 970 960 950 940 1 7+00 6+00 5+00 4+00 9 too -U HDPE�D �M E / GAS TEST POINT — —YC 94.fi \ 1 � i �*l PERTY LINE s IN\k Ogg6 )9Nj1 )NV= 972.0 )INV= 971.7 \ r EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HEAGREESTOBEFULLYRESPONSIBLEFORANY AND ALL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. DRAWING NAME NO. BY I DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS XXX 1 MJV 10/09/24 CITY REVIEW COMMENTS- 10/02/24 INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I DRAWN BY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE MJV SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY LAWS OF THE STATE OF!NM'INeN'(E�S�OTA. CHECKED BY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF THE RIGHT RESPONSIBILITY. DLS SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING DATE FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. DANIEL L. SCHMIDT, P.E. no Date: 09-20-2024 Lic. No. 26147 LEGEND DESCRIPTION PROPOSED EXISTING BUILDING SETBACK LINE BSBL GARAGE SETBACK LINE PARCEL BOUNDARY LINE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS — CURB AND GUTTER RIGHT-0E-WAY SANM'M SERVICE BACKYARD CATCH BASIN CATCH BASIN ------» STORM SEWER MANHOLE�+— FI-ARED END SECTION WIRIP-RAP STORM STUCTURE IABEL DRAINTILE W CLEAROUTS c�2 — — — — -0 — — — —0 SAN ITARY STUCTURE LABEL nnio SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE WATERMAIN — HYDRART GATE VALVE n QZ Io ^ � L[1 w UA LL I z J_ o- W 0 o- a N9 \ o w LL o 3 T� 3+00 2+00 1+00 0+00 w� I SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. a` m 1400025THAVE N#120PLYMOUTH,MIN. 55447(952)47G6000 ORONO, MINNESOTA GNFRS P`P�2 1010 1000 990 980 970 960 950 - 940 -1+00 50 25 I0I 25 50 100 nn nil �■■■■1 4'0 RTC 1 ALE IN FEET FILE NO. PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 369IM01 LEAF & FOX STREET UP2 ANDERSON REDA I 356 1010 1000 990 980 970 960 950 940 LEGEND DESCRIPTION PROPOSED EXISTING BUILDING SETBACK LINE BSBL GARAGE SETBACK LINE PARCEL BOUNDARY LINE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS — CURB AND GUTTER RIGHT-0E-WAY SANMM SERVICE BACKYARD CATCH BASIN CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER MANHOLE —» FLARED END SECTION WIRIP-RAP STORM STUCTURE LABEL DRAINTILE—EAROUTS [} SANITARY STUCTURE LABEL nnio SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE> —MAIN — — — HYDRART — DATE VALVE __ +i FORCEMAIN INSTALL ]'OFF EDGE OF BIT PAVE - F NINSTALL70FF EDGE OF SI.FAVE� 9 / PROPERTY LINE ae R PROPERTY LINE � ]O > aOPEF .o o ea�T cN J ^ III,,iii\\\ ��� a ii HDP oa T = LEAF STREET VLEAF STREET I m c � N, G G —L�A9 �G a 65 6 �— FOB FO — cn5 �� lil w I - y FD 1,„S �� F C;,. U / cn m / x / o / FM:25°EN -5-BEN �4�'-----------------------MItNIMDM DSS 17+00 16+00 15+00 EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAV ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HEAGREESTOBEFULLYRESPONSIBLEFORANY AND ALL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE REVISIONS DRAM 1 MJV 10/09/24 CITY REVIEW COMMENTS- 10/02/24 7.5' DEPTH T@69.1 14+00 13+00 12+00 11+00 10+00 9+00 8+00 7+00 USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT 1 �0vks S(, � SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. W o SATH RE—BERGQUIST, INC. INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE a ,,,, m 14000 25TH AVE N #120 PLYMOUTH, MN. 55447 (952) 47G6000 USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING DANIEL L. P.E. m GryP FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. SCHMIDT, PP`' Date: 09-20-2024 Lic. No. 26147 6+00 CITY PROJECT NO. ORONO, MINNESOTA 5+00 4+00 2 A y 5 �.tc / GAS TEST POINT G INV� —9747 ,firE 6A$, J901.'T d 3+00 1010 1000 990 980 970 960 950 J 940 1+00 50 25 0 25 50 100 NONE ALE IN FEET PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN LEAF & FOX STREET ANDERSON REDA UF357 1010 1000 990 980 970 960 950 940 - - FOX S +m x / L�^ 26+00 25+00 24+00 23+00 22+00 21+00 20+00 EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAV ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HEAGREESTOBEFULLYRESPONSIBLEFORANY AND ALL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS XXX 1 MJV 10/09/24 CITY REVIEW COMMENTS- 10/02/24 INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I DRAWN BY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE MJV SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY LAWS OF THE STATE OF!NM'INeN'(E�S�OTA. CHECKED BY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF THE RIGHT RESPONSIBILITY. \I \ DLS SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE U-�"��'r�_''lC/ USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING DATE FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. DANIEL L. SCHMIDT, P.E. Date: 09-20-2024 Lic. No. 26147 991 v I I �365.3 LEGEND DESCRIPTION PROPOSED EXISTING BUILDING SETBACK LINE BSBL GARAGE SETBACK LINE PARCEL BOUNDARY LINE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS — CURB AND GUTTER RIGHT-OF-WAV SANM'M SERVICE _ sl BACKYARD CATCH BASIN n » CATCH BASIN » » STORM SEWER MANHOLE —» FLARED END SECTION WIRIP-RAP » STORM STUCTURE LABEL GB F13 DRAINTILE W EANOUTS (} — — — — � — — — — — —0 SANITARY STUCTURE LAB EL ma SMIITARY SEWER MANHOLE > WATERMAIN —I I — HYDRANT GATE VALVE I��I I��I NOTES: STATION 16+05 TO 17+10, FORCEMAIN TO BE INSTALLED 2' FROM EDGE OF RIGHT OF WAY (ROW) NEAR / CROSSING GAS MAIN. GAS MAIN TO BE POTHOLED AS NEEDED FOR VERIFICATION. 19+00 16+00 17+00 16+00 w� <N SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. a`ttm 1400025THAVE N#120PLYMOUTH,MIN. 55447(952)47G6000 ORONO, MINNESOTA GNFRS P`P�2 15+0 1010 1000 990 980 970 960 950 940 0 50 2IIA� ■ ■ ■ ■ 1 5 I0I 25 50 100 4'O RTC 1 n n n LE IN FEET FILE NO. PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 369IM01 LEAF & FOX STREET UP4 ANDERSON REDA UF358 1010 1000 990 980 970 960 950 940 33+00 ;PI'H FM � TA54.8 M FM H11 HOPE TA521 FM -LP ].S�bEPTH FM .INS T-951.3 32+00 31+00 30+00 29+00 28+00 27+00 26+00 25+00 24+00 23+00 LEGEND DESCRIPTION PROPOSED EXISTING BUILDING SETBACK LINE BSBL GARAGE SETBACK LINE PARCEL BOUNDARY LINE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS CURB AND GUTTER RIGHT-OF-WAV BAN —SERVICE � BACKYARD CATCH BASIN n » CATCH BASIN » » STORM SEWER MANHOLE —» FLARED END SECTION WIRIP-RAP » STORM STUCTURE LABEL DRAINTILE W EANOUTS 6�2 — — — — � — — — — — — —0 SANITARY STUCTURE LABEL SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE > WATERMAIN— HYDRANT GATE NOTES: STATION 22+00 TO 28+25, FORCEMAIN TO BE INSTALLED 2' FROM EDGE OF RIGHT OF WAY (ROW) UNDER GAS MAIN. GAS MAIN TO BE POTHOLED AS NEEDED FOR VERIFICATION. 1010 1000 990 980 970 960 950 940 EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING AND ALL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT WORK. HEAGREESTOBEFULLYRESPONSIBLEFORANY AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. DRAWING NAME NO. BY I DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS CITY PROJECT NO. XXX 1 MJV 10/09/24 CITY REVIEW COMMENTS- 10/02/24 INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I��gPs sLR�F --- DRAWN BY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. o SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. MJV INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE n IC/ a .,., ORONO, CHECKED BY 1400025TH AVE N#120 PLYMOUTH, MN. 55447(952) 476-6000 DLS USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING ,JU"�`I„ . m `� GryP y �� M I N N E SOTA DATE FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. DANIEL L. SCHMIDT, P.E. Rg P`' PAP 09-12-24 Date: 09-20-2024 Lic. No. 26147 50 25 0 25 50 100 nnhnri ti����i 4'O RTC 1 ALE IN FEET FILE NO. PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 369IM01 LEAF & FOX STREET UP5�Txl ANDERSON REDA �UF3, To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Laura Oakden, Community Development Director Date: February 18, 2025 Subject: LA24-000063, City of Orono, Comprehensive Plan Amendment Public Hearing Application Summary: The City is proposing to make minor changes to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan as follows: • Introduction of a new Land Use class "Urban Large Lot Estate", and • Modification of the residential and commercial breakdown under the existing Land Use class "Urban Medium Density Residential/Mixed-Use". Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the amendment as proposed. Summary of Changes Existing Land Use Classes Class Density (Low) Density (High) Urban Estate Density Residential 0.5 2 Urban Low Density Residential 3 8 Urban Medium/ Mixed Use 8 15 Urban Medium High Density 15 20 Urban High Density Residential 20 25 PROPOSED LAND USE CLASSES Class Density (Low) Density (High) URBAN LARGE LOT ESTATE (new) 0.125 0.5 Urban Estate Density Residential 0.5 2 Urban Low Density Residential 3 8 Urban Medium/Mixed Use 8 15 Urban Medium High Density 15 20 Urban High Density Residential 20 25 Background The Comprehensive Plan (Plan) establishes Land Use classes for each area of the city. With each residential land use class, the Plan applies a density range, to establish an appropriate level of density based on multiple factors, including surrounding land uses, transportation opportunities, community character, and utility options. Developments that do not fall within the designated density range may require an amendment to the Plan. Proposal Currently there is a proposed project to extend sewer infrastructure to a few existing large lots on 360 FILE # LA24-000063 February 18, 2025 Page 2 of 3 Lake Minnetonka near the west end of Fox Street. The proposed sewer extension is located within the Municipal Urban Sewer Area (MUSA) and has sewer located in nearby rights -of -way and abutting developments. The proposal will extend sewer down Leaf Street, through a private road off Fox Street that serves the existing lakeshore lots. The Comprehensive Plan guides this area for a recommended density of 2-acres per lot. Today, the lots in this location, range from 2 - 8 acres in size. In order to extend sewer infrastructure into this area, the lots must meet the guidance of the Plan's Land Use class. The city does not have an existing Land Use category to match the existing conditions. The city and the Metropolitan Council cannot permit the sewer extension until the Land Use classification is reflective of the existing conditions in the area. The solution is to amend the Plan to create a Land Use classification that is reflective of the existing conditions. The current proposal is to create a new land use classification; Urban Large Lot Estates, to reflect Orono's existing lot sizes in this specific area. This new classification contemplates allowing a few of the existing larger lakeshore lots (within the MUSA) to connect to sewer. The size of the lots are less dense than the current density guidance under to current Land Use Plan. The current land use class calls for 1 unit for every 2 acres and would require more development in this area. Additionally, staff is proposing a text amendment within the Urban Medium Density Residential/Mixed-Use category to increase the commercial/residential ratio from 70% residential/30% commercial to 85% residential/15% commercial. Together, the proposed changes will balance each other and ensure that sewer can be provided to environmentally sensitive properties around Lake Minnetonka, yet allow the city to maintain the density standards of 3 units/acre throughout areas of the city with existing sewer connections. Plan Analysis The City is required by a Metropolitan Council mandate to meet certain goals in the areas of affordable housing, growth opportunity, and density: Affordable Housing. The proposed amendment will not impact the affordable housing requirements within the city. The City must provide an opportunity for 154 new affordable housing units. The Met Council recognizes that densities at 8 units per acre satisfy the affordable housing goal for the City of Orono. The city meets this by guiding the appropriate number of acres at a density greater than 8 units per acre. Sewered Growth. The City must provide opportunity for sewered growth to meet the expected demand in the time periods from 2020-2030 and 2031-2040. This is accomplished by identifying parcels with the potential to develop with city sewer in the given time periods. While the city cannot require development of any parcel, planning ahead for the growth is important for bolstering infrastructure, services, and schools. The proposed plan allows for sewered growth within environmentally sensitive areas, such as lakeshore lots, and additional opportunities for housing in the city's commercial corridors, such as Wayzata Boulevard and Shoreline Drive. Density. The city must develop at an overall density average of 3.0 units per acre in its sewered area. The city wants to provide sewer access to areas adjacent to the lake without 361 FILE # LA24-000063 February 18, 2025 Page 3 of 3 increasing the density in those areas, so higher density is identified as appropriate in other areas. The proposed amendment will allow existing large lots in sensitive areas to connect to sewer and will allow a mixed use of residential and commercial where the city has identified opportunities for density. Table 313-4 from the Plan is attached as Exhibit B. This table identifies parcels eligible for development, their guided land use and density, anticipated growth period, Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA), and Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ). This amendment is not introducing a higher density class within the city, rather it reflects the density of the current built environment. Public Comments To date, no written comments from the public have been received, though staff has fielded a number of calls requesting additional information. The City of Spring Park responded with no concerns; their comments are attached as Exhibit C. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find the Land Use classification changes to be appropriate? 2. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the changes as described to the Land Use tables within the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 362 Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 18, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 6.11 LA24-000063, CITY OF ORONO, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and approve the Comprehensive Plan Amendment that would extend sewer along Leaf and Fox Street to serve several lakeshore lots off Fox Street by creating a land use classification for large lakeshore lots. The Comprehensive Plan supports replacing septic systems along the lakeshore. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 11:02 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 11:02 p.m. Commissioners said the proposal was confusing, but the explanation clarified it and the amendment makes sense. McCutcheon moved, Prchal seconded, to approve LA24-000063, Comprehensive Plan Amendment. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays 1 (Ressler). 363 AGENDA ITEM Date: March 10, 2025 Item: 26 Title: LA25-000001, 485 Orono Orchard Road South, Preliminary Plat: "Sky Blue Waters" & Termination of Covenant - Resolution 7564 Presenter: Melanie Curtis, Planner Section: Community Development Report Purpose: The applicant is requesting approval to subdivide the property to create one, new 2+ acre buildable lot. The applicant is also requesting the Council terminate an existing covenant relating to sewer connections (see Document # 7285795). 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline: The application was submitted on January 6, 2025 and considered to be complete on January 24. Therefore the 120-day preliminary plat review period will end on May 24, 2025. 3. Background: The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval to create one new 2+ acre buildable lot. The existing 21.3 acre property fronts on Orono Orchard Road South and is split by Fox Street. Additionally, there is a existing covenant against the property relating to the number of sewer connections. The applicant is requesting termination of the covenant preferring to have the City rely on the comprehensive plan, zoning, and sewer regulations to govern the property. Please refer to the Planning Staff Report attached as Exhibit C for a full analysis of the project. For more information about the existing site conditions, reference the Aerial and Street view exhibits included in the Planning Packet. 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment: The Planning Commission reviewed this application at the February 18 meeting. After the public hearing, the Commission voted 6 to 1 to recommend approval of the subdivision and termination of the covenant. Public Comment: Staff has received a number of inquiries but no formal comments were submitted. Comments were provided at the public hearing centered around the existing access to Lot 2 off of Orono Orchard Road in the area of the Dakota Trail and the historic nature of the property. Please refer to the draft minutes attached as Exhibit D and the meeting video for more information. 6. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval as applied including termination of the restrictive covenant, Document 7285795 at the time of Final Plat. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Move to adopt Resolution 7564, to approve the preliminary plat and terminate the restrictive covenant (Document 7285795). Exhibits 364 A. Resolution 7564 Prelim Plat B. Proposed Preliminary Plat C. Preliminary Plat Staff Memo D. Draft PC Minutes E. Termination of Declaration 365 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7564 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR "SKY BLUE WATERS" FILE NO. LA25-000001 WHEREAS, Tom Bray (the "Developer") on behalf of Edward H. Hamm Jr., Trustee of "Amendment and Restatement of Trust of Edward H Hamm dated October 10th 1995", who is the owner of the property addressed 485 Orono Orchard Road South and legally described within Exhibit A (the "Property"); WHEREAS on January 6, 2025, the Developer applied for Preliminary Plat approval to subdivide the Property into two buildable lots; and WHEREAS, as part of the preliminary plat review, the Developer requested the City terminate the Declaration of Subdivision Covenants dated July 9, 1999 and recorded in the office of the Hennepin County Recorder on April 14, 2000, as Document No. 7285795 (the "Declaration"); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and Subdivision Codes, on February 18, 2025, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing for the application at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning the application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on February 18, 2025, the Planning Commission reviewed the application and recommended by a vote of 6 to 1 that the City Council grant preliminary plat approval and terminate the Declaration, as applied; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the proposal at a regular meeting held on March 10, 2025, and hereby makes the following findings with regards to this application: FINDINGS Al. This application was reviewed as Zoning File LA25-000001. A2. The Property is guided in the 2040 Orono Community Management Plan (CMP) for Rural Residential, 1 unit per 2 acres. The proposal involves the creation of 2 lots at 0.11 units per acre. The northern lot provides future subdivision opportunities; the project provides the opportunity to meet the CMP goals with a future subdivision. Staff finds the proposed plan brings the site closer to conformance of the CMP and meets the intent of the density goals at this time. A3. The proposal is consistent with surrounding development. 366 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7564 A4. The Property is located within the MUSA and will be served with City sewer and private water supply wells. A5. The Property is zoned RR-1 B Single Family Rural Residential District, which requires a minimum lot area of 2 acres and a minimum lot width of 200 feet. A6. The Property contains a total area of approximately The site is 23.18 acres in total area, 17.9 acres of the land is considered to be dry, buildable. A7. The proposed plat would create one new buildable lot. The proposed lots meet the minimum zoning district standards. a. Lot 1 (north) is proposed to be 15.13 net acres; it will have approximately 1,300 feet of frontage on Orono Orchard Road and 300 feet in width along Fox Street (front). b. Lot 2 is proposed to be 2.8 net acres and will have 340 feet in width along Fox Street (front). A8. The 21.3-acre property consists of approximately 13 acres of planted or cultivated areas, 2.2 acres of wetland, 5.2 acres is developed with impervious surfaces and mowed turf grasses; and maple basswood forests cover approximately 2 acres of the site on mostly slopes between the maintained lawns and wetland areas. No rare plant communities were observed or identified on site. A9. All of the existing buildings and improvements are proposed to remain. A10. Access to each of the lots will continue to be served by the existing access points on Orono Orchard Road South and Fox Street at this time. A11. Regarding the Declaration, the Property is currently served by City sewer. In 1999, the existing septic systems were failing, and to serve the existing buildings, the City approved three sewer connections although the Property was not within the MUSA. The Property has since been included in the MUSA. At this time, the owner is requesting termination of the Declaration. A termination document has been provided for approval. CONCLUSIONS, ORDERS, AND CONDITIONS NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby grants the following: • Approval of the termination of the Declaration according to the ; and • Preliminary Plat Approval for a 2-lot subdivision per the Preliminary Plat survey/drawing by Sunde Engineering dated 12/23/2024 and revised on 01/24/2025 attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to the following conditions: 367 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7564 B1. Lot Standards. Any proposed improvements must meet all setbacks requirements of the Zoning Code. B2. Drainage and Utility Easements. On the final plat, Drainage and Utility Easements shall be dedicated to the public 10 feet along all exterior property lines, and 5 feet either side of interior property lines, except such easements shall be increased to accommodate drainage where required, subject to City staff approval. If applicable, Drainage Easements shall be granted over any stormwater facilities required by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District; the Drainage Easements shall be shown on the Plat. B3. Development Fees. *Final fee amounts will be provided at the time of Final Plat. a. Park Dedication Fee. The subdivision is subject to the standard Park Dedication Fee requirement. Absent the need for a land dedication, the project will be subject to the City's Park Dedication Fee at the time of Final Plat. This fee is determined by the fair market value of the land being subdivided. The Hennepin County Assessor will be consulted to determine the market value of the land to establish the amount of the fee. The developer is proposing two building sites or one (1) new lot. The Park Fee for this development will be approximately $8,168*. b. Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee. The development is subject to the Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee, as established in the City's Official Fee Schedule at the time of Final Plat approval. Currently, based on the 2025 Fee Schedule, the development of a property within a 2- acre residential zone requires payment of $8,060 per each new lot and as proposed, the Developer will be subject to payment of a SWDT fee for one new lot or $8060.00*. B4. City Engineer Approval. Approval of the plat is subject to recommendations of City Engineer Adam Edwards. B5. Plans and Specifications. The plans and specifications submitted for review and approval by the City and other appropriate jurisdictions prior to approval of the Final Plat. B6. Expiration. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Owners, but are permissive only and must be exercised by filing a Final Plat application within one year of the date of Council approval, or the preliminary plat approvals will expire on that date. 368 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7564 FINAL SUBMITTALS The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Community Development Department at least four (4) weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting (on the second and fourth Mondays of the month). The required submittals are as follows: C1. Record plat drawings in the form of (1) to -scale digital copy; two (2) mylar copies (one copy for the City's records and one for filing with Hennepin County); and one (1) copy reduced to 1 " = 200'. Drawing to include: a. Lot lines platted per preliminary plat survey/drawing by Sunde Engineering dated 01/24/2025 attached hereto as Exhibit B, except as modified herein. b. Dedication of Drainage and Utility Easements 10' along exterior property lines and 5' along the interior property line, with exceptions and additions as noted herein. c. Dedication of Drainage Easements over all drainageways. d. Naming of plat. C2. Legal documents required: a. Title opinion addressed to the City or a title insurance policy in favor of the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. b. The Developer must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the Property. C3. Plat approval fees to be paid: Total due: $19,528.00 ** Final Plat development fees will be determined by the official fee schedule at the time of Final Plat review. a. Final plat fee: $800.00 b. Park Dedication Fee: $8,168** c. Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee: $ 8,060.00** d. Final Plat Escrow: $2,500.00 4 369 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7564 C4.This Approval shall be effective until March 10, 2026 per the provisions of Zoning Code Section 82- 116. If Final Plat Approval is not granted by that date, the terms and conditions of this resolution shall be null and void. The City Council at its sole discretion may extend this effective period. ATTEST: ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 10th day of March, 2025. CITY OF ORONO: Christine Lusian, City Clerk Bob Tunheim, Mayor 370 Existing Legal Description (Per Stewart Title Guaranty Company as issued by Trademark Title Services, Inc. Commitment for Title Insurance Commitment No. 24-4094, commitment date October 21, 2024) The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: That part of Government Lot 4 and the Southwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of Government Lot 4, distant 434.3 feet South of the Northeast corner thereof, designated as Point A; thence Northwesterly deflecting to the right from said East line 101 degrees 43 minutes, o distance of 182 feet; thence Northwesterly 60 feet along a curve to the right with a radius of 4687.5 feet; thence Northwesterly 200 feet along a curve to the right with a radius of 222.45 feet; thence Northerly 175 feet along a curve to the right with a radius of 237.56 feet; thence Northerly 50 feet along a curve to the right with a radius of 527.42 feet; thence Northeasterly to a point on the North line of Government Lot 4, distant 360 feet West of the Northeast corner thereof designated as Point B; thence northeasterly 55.51 feet along a line which forms an angle of 68 degrees 40 minutes 08 seconds with said North line of Government Lat 4; thence northerly 100.00 feet along a tangential curve concave to the west having a radius of 181.40 feet and a central angle of 31 degrees 35 minutes 07 seconds; thence northwesterly 125.00 feet along a compound curve concave to the west having a radius of 283.70 feet and a central angle of 25 degrees 14 minutes 42 seconds; thence northwesterly on a line tangent to last described curve 267.40 feet; thence northwesterly deflecting 02 degrees 23 minutes 00 seconds to the left from last described course 123.34 feet; thence northwesterly 104.40 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 164.00 feet and a central angle of 36 degrees 28 minutes 30 seconds, to a point on the west line of the East One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 2, exclusive of the highway (33 feet wide) upon the easterly side thereof, said East One -Half being ascertained after taking from the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said section said highway upon the easterly side, and which is 636.66 feet north from the Southwest corner of said East One -Half so ascertained; thence north along said west line of the East One -Half so ascertained 679.66 feet to the northwest corner thereof; thence east along the north line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 2 to the northeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2; thence south along the east line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2 and Government Lot 4 to the point of beginning. Also that part of said West One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2 exclusive of highway (33 feet wide) on the easterly side thereof, said West One Half being ascertained after taking from said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2 said highway upon the easterly side; lying easterly of Macmillan Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof and northerly of a line and its westerly extension described as commencing at the northeast corner of said West One- Half so ascertained; thence on on assumed bearing of South 00 degrees 17 minutes 01 seconds East, along the east line of said West One -Half so ascertained 679.85 feet, more or less to a point 636.66 feet north of the southeast earner of said West One -Half, said point being the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence deflecting right at an angle of 83 degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds on a line bearing South 83 degrees 35 minutes 59 seconds West 33.68 feet; thence South 82 degrees 23 371 minutes 59 seconds West 66.32 feet to the most southerly southeast corner of Outlot C, said Macmillan Addition and said line there terminating. Together with a non-exclusive easement for driveway purposes over, under and across part of Outlot C and Lot 2, Block I, MacMillan Addition and the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 17, Range 23, as described in the Private Road Agreement recorded January 14, 1930 as Document No. A1579568 and amended in the Agreement Regarding Correction of Easement Legal Description recorded June 19, 2018 as Document Nos. A10563491 and T5538418. Together with a non-exclusive easement for driveway purposes aver that part of Government Lot 4, Section 2, Township 117, Range 23 lying Northerly and Easterly of a line and its extension drawn parallel with and 8 feet distant Southerly and Westerly from the line between Point A and Point B measured at right angles and radially to said line between Point A and Point B as contained in instrument recorded in CR Book 1643 of Deeds, page 333, Doc. No. 2295932. (See Order Doc. No. 6076705). Hennepin County, Minnesota. 372 CL! F --T Ma \% MIA Afix Ng w RY888RY 88R8R8R RSR8R8YRSR8R8R8RRYR R8RRY88RSR8RRRRSRBRRYSSR8 ww Sw --39 39 . ...... 63 -- Sm. .............. ........................................... gi Tia, 94 O 43 lj! ffillu Fil di N lflu "as errs Up fl IN! i;. f 54 IN W 1/4 CORNER OF SEC. 2, T. 117, R.23 FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT T L_L/l / T 11 In, L _ V l ARAGE /I7,'r'AL H&G-ARA Ul F7/ 1 / LJ `7l L_L$THE JERI S. VEACH REV TRUSTCpJCRETE T,wo.z�580 \ FOX ST, ORONO, MN 55391 389 ORONO ORCHARD RD S,ORl✓EWAY ORONO, MN 55391 L \ FOUND IRON MONUMENT RLS 17006 /J �JOWNER: JAMIN E MARKS 1570 FOX ST, ORONO, MN 55391 PID:0211723320007 \ FOUND IRON MONUMENT RLS 17006 ' \ \ 1 r � om \ 1560 FOX ST, \i ORONO, MN 55391 z \ PID: 021 1723320009 V V �J \� AGREEMENT REGARDING CORRECTION OF \ \ EASEMENT OF PRIVATE MOST S'LY J ROAD AGREEMENT SE CORNER OF \ \`\J DOC. NO.S A 10563491 & T5538418 4a OUTLOT C, MACMIL ADDITION / /1-) T L _ l_/ / �— ---t)— _' °ham/ T S82 66. 32 / 33.68-'" S83035159 W r� �1 o z IAA 1 / 0-0 1 VV 04 w / I 1 \�0 wo N� � Q 1Av 1 %\r I r �(0w�wz V w=�oJ J' ��Z(nJ J — 494.00 GOVERNMENT N88°57'17"W LOT 4 OF SEC 2, T. 117, R. 23 J Li 0 o X JU � L,, w Q L LJ \N Z - Z LIJ I J�w0 bi occOo LIJ Z U) Z r M o tO m OWNER: DAVID C WEYERHAEUSER 1540 FOX ST ORONO, MN 55391 PID: 021 1723320003 SE COR OF THE W 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC 2 EXCLUSIVE OF HWY UPON E'LY SIDE THEREOF. J (� 56 ° 19101, v' A— 7, 0 7c /„ —// L = 60. 00 N78 7— 00 DRIVEW,30 ;3,5 EASSEME TA4b PER DIAMETER HENN DOC. NO. A2295932 COUNTY MOUNMENT OWNER: / WAYZATA BAY, LLC FOX ST ORONO, / ORONO, MN 55391 PID: 021 1723330002 /Aly�P\��o A J �./ v i NE CORNER OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC 2 LEGEND O Denotes iron monument set marked with P.L.S. No. 44900. CJ Denotes 1.17 inch diameter copper magnetized marker with disc cap affixed stamped LS-44900 set • Denotes found iron monument, unless otherwise noted 14 � ? Z o r AC Denotes air conditioner z w w \ ) AIS Denotes advertisement/information sign M BE Denotes building entrance co Of o w � ��1� BTC Denotes top of bituminous curb w z o � CB Denotes catch basin 0 0 o CBOX Denotes control box � w — CBX Denotes communication box Jo CLP Denotes clothesline pole W LL CO z CMP Denotes corrugated metal pipe CCOL Denotes building column DG Denotes drain grate J DIP Denotes ductile iron pipe EM Denotes electric meter EO Denotes electric outlet GCR Denotes gate card reader GM Denotes gas meter GP Denotes guard post GW Denotes guy wire HCR Denotes disabled ramp INV Denotes structure invert LA Denotes landscaping LP Denotes light pole _ D/CKENSON MG Denotes metal grate STREET MH Denotes manhole OD Denotes overhead door FOUND IRON — CHU Denotes overhead utility lines MONUMENT RLS 1275 (P) Denotes per plan PEP Denotes polyethylene pipe EA7ST/NG HOUSEPKS Denotes parking sign J GARAGE PP Denotes power pole PPU Denotes power pole with underground utility PVC Denotes polyvinylchloride pipe 0 o z `/ RCP Denotes reinforced concrete pipe �04w Ld ) Z__ RD Denotes roof drain N m \ SAN Denotes sanitary manhole Z SAN S Denotes sanitary sewer w 0 C) Q ) SANC Denotes sanitary cleanout ~ �z 00 ST S Denotes storm sewer 0 —w ro TAD Denotes truncated domes plate w Cn = 00 TCS Denotes traffic control sign w Ld Ld z TRANS Denotes transformer UGC Denotes underground communication line UGE Denotes underground electric line VCP Denotes vitrified clay pipe \I WWELL Denotes window well EA75T/NG HO(bE GARAGE j ARB Denotes Arborvitae \ BAS Denotes Basswood tree FOUND 3/4 J i CED Denotes Cedar tree INCH OPEN < > COT Denotes Cottonwood tree CRAB Denotes Crabapple tree CEVG Denotes evergreen tree I HACK Denotes Hackberry tree I\ LOC Denotes Locust tree EA7ST/NG HOUSE R GARAGE L1 I MPL Denotes Maple tree PIN Denotes Pine tree < SPR Denotes Spruce tree TR Denotes deciduous tree < WIL Denotes Willow tree J WLNT Denotes Walnut tree EXISTING HOUSE h GARAGE PUBLIC ROW AS DEDICATED IN THE OF ORONO AND RESERVED IN DECREE, BOOK 80 OF MISC., PG. 307 AS DOC. NO. 294029 4c POINT OF BEGINNING BITUNIN OUS X\ `J `ftEES J E `\ `1 J 80 0 80 160 SCALE IN FEET G P� f�v 15 p� G� 5 P• PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS Drainage and Utility Easements are shown thus: I I 1 �0 o lo—1 o - - - - - - - - - - I L - - - - - - - - - - Being 10 feet in width and adjoining side lot lines and being 10 feet in width and adjoining public ways and rear lot lines, unless otherwise indicated on this plat. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED (Per Stewart Title Guaranty Company as issued by Trademark Title Services, Inc. Commitment for Title Insurance Commitment No. 244094, commitment date October 21, 2024) The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: That part of Government Lot 4 and the Southwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of Government Lot 4, distant 434.3 feet South of the Northeast corner thereof, designated as Point A; thence Northwesterly deflecting to the right from said East line 101 degrees 43 minutes, a distance of 182 feet; thence Northwesterly 60 feet along a curve to the right with a radius of 4687.5 feet; thence Northwesterly 200 feet along a curve to the right with a radius of 222.45 feet; thence Northerly 175 feet along a curve to the right with a radius of 237.56 feet; thence Northerly 50 feet along a curve to the right with a radius of 527.42 feet; thence Northeasterly to a point on the North line of Government Lot 4, distant 360 feet West of the Northeast corner thereof designated as Point B; thence northeasterly 55.51 feet along a line which forms an angle of 68 degrees 40 minutes 08 seconds with said North line of Government Lot 4; thence northerly 100.00 feet along a tangential curve concave to the west having a radius of 181.40 feet and a central angle of 31 degrees 35 minutes 07 seconds; thence northwesterly 125.00 feet along a compound curve concave to the west having a radius of 283.70 feet and a central angle of 25 degrees 14 minutes 42 seconds; thence northwesterly on a line tangent to last described curve 267.40 feet; thence northwesterly deflecting 02 degrees 23 minutes 00 seconds to the left from last described course 123.34 feet; thence northwesterly 104.40 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 164.00 feet and a central angle of 36 degrees 28 minutes 30 seconds, to a point on the west line of the East One —Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 2, exclusive of the highway (33 feet wide) upon the easterly side thereof, said East One —Half being ascertained after taking from the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said section said highway upon the easterly side, and which is 636.66 feet north from the Southwest corner of said East One —Half so ascertained; thence north along said west line of the East One —Half so ascertained 679.66 feet to the northwest corner thereof; thence east along the north line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 2 to the northeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2; thence south along the east line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2 and Government Lot 4 to the point of beginning. Also that part of said West One —Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2 exclusive of highway (33 feet wide) on the easterly side thereof, said West One Half being ascertained after taking from said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2 said highway upon the easterly side; lying easterly of Macmillan Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof and northerly of a line and its westerly extension described as commencing at the northeast corner of said West One— Half so ascertained; thence on an assumed bearing of South 00 degrees 17 minutes 01 seconds East, along the east line of said West One —Half so ascertained 679.85 feet, more or less to a point 636.66 feet north of the southeast corner of said West One —Half, said point being the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence deflecting right at an angle of 83 degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds on a line bearing South 83 degrees 35 minutes 59 seconds West 33.68 feet; thence South 82 degrees 23 minutes 59 seconds West 66.32 feet to the most southerly southeast corner of Outlot C, said Macmillan Addition and said line there terminating. Together with a non—exclusive easement for driveway purposes over, under and across part of Outlot C and Lot 2, Block 1, MacMillan Addition and the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 17, Range 23, as described in the Private Road Agreement recorded January 14, 1930 as Document No. A1579568 and amended in the Agreement Regarding Correction of Easement Legal Description recorded June 19, 2018 as Document Nos. A 10563491 and T5538418. Together with a non—exclusive easement for driveway purposes over that part of Government Lot 4, Section 2, Township 117, Range 23 lying Northerly and Easterly of a line and its extension drawn parallel with and 8 feet distant Southerly and Westerly from the line between Point A and Point B measured at right angles and radially to said line between Point A and Point B as contained in instrument recorded in CR Book 1643 of Deeds, page 333, Doc. No. 2295932. (See Order Doc. No. 6076705). TITLE COMMITMENT Stewart Title Guaranty Company as issued by Trademark Title Services, Inc. Commitment for Title Insurance Commitment No. 24-4094, commitment date October 21, 2024, was relied upon as to matters of record. Schedule B Exceptions: OExceptions are indicated on survey with circled numbers unless otherwise noted. Items not listed below are standard exceptions and/or are not survey related. 4.) The following recital(s) appearing in the current Certificate of Title No. 1575769 will be carried forward to any new Certificate of Title: a.) Subject to a non—exclusive easement for driveway purposes over under and across part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 17, Range 23 as described in the Private Road Agreement recorded January 14, 1930, as Document No. A1579568, as amended in the Agreement Regarding Correction of Easement Legal Description recorded June 19, 2018, as Document No. A 10563491 and T5538418; (shown on survey) b.) Subject to a non—exclusive easement for driveway purposes over that part of the above —described Government Lot 4, Section 2, Township 117, Range 23 lying Southerly and Westerly of a line and its extension drawn parallel with and 8 feet distant Northerly and Easterly from the line between Point A and Point B measured at right angles and radially to said line between Point A and Point Bas contained in instrument recorded in Document No. A2295932; (shown on survey) c.) Subject to a public right of way for Fox Street as dedicated in the Plat of Orono recorded on August 18, 1887, and reserved in the Final Decree recorded June 7, 1899, in Book 80 of Misc., Page 307 as Document No. A294029; (shown on survey) d.) Subject to any rights or encumbrances which may be subsisting specified in Section 508.25, Chapter 508, Minnesota Statutes, and all acts amendatory thereof. 5.) Subject to terms and conditions contained in Declaration of Subdivision Covenants, recorded as Document No. 7285795. (Document states that no more than 3 dwellings may exist on the property and if the property is subdivided, it shall be divided into no more than 3 Lots) 6.) Subject to terms and conditions contained in Easement Agreement, recorded as Document No. 7474628 (shown on survey) 11.) Subject to terms and conditions contained in Resolution No. 7474 approving acceptance of an easement for public road purposes (Fox Street) and an easement for public road purposes (Orono Orchard Road South) and Approving an assent to registration of the title to certain land in the City of Orono, recorded as Document No. Al1280629. 12.) Subject to terms and conditions contained in Grant of Permanent Easement for Public Road Purposes in favor of City of Orono over the East 33 feet, recorded as Document No. Al 1280630. (shown on survey) 13.) Subject to terms and conditions contained in Grant of Permanent Easement for Public Road Purposes in favor of City of Orono over the North 33 feet of Government Lot 4, recorded as Document No. Al 1280631. (shown on survey) 14.) Subject to terms and conditions contained in Electric Easement in favor of Northern States Power Company, recorded as Document No. A 11282424. (shown on survey) 15.) Subject to terms and conditions contained in Order and Decree of Registration, recorded as Document No. A6076705. 18.) Rights of other abutting land owners, State of Minnesota and Department of Natural Resources to use that part of premises which lies within the bed of the pond. 19.) Rights of adjoining owners in the use and possession of a common driveway over the land and other land. GENERAL NOTES I.) Survey coordinate basis: Hennepin County Coordinate System 2.) Right—of—way widths are per found monumentation, unless otherwise indicated. 3.) [ ] Bearings and/or dimensions listed within brackets are per plat or record documents. 4.) PID: 0211723320001 Site Address:485 Orono Orchard Rd S, Orono, MN 55391 5.) Wetland shown hereon is per delineation markers observed in the process of conducting the fieldwork. Markers were set by Pinnacle Engineering, May 21, 2021. 6.) Lot I, Block 2 and a small southerly portion of Lot 1, Block I, fall within the Shoreland Overlay District, but fails to meet the criteria of the Bluff Impact Zone. The Shoreland Overlay District map and Bluff Determination information was obtained from the City of Orono Map web site on 12/23/2024. UTILITY NOTES I.) Utility information from plans and markings was combined with observed evidence of utilities to develop a view of the underground utilities shown hereon. However, lacking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot be accurately, completely and reliably depicted. In addition, Gopher State One Call locate requests from surveyors may be ignored or result in an incomplete response. Where additional or more detailed information is required, excavation and/or a private utility locate request may be necessary. 2.) Other underground utilities of which we are unaware may exist. Verify all utilities critical to construction or design. 3.) Some underground utility locations are shown as marked onsite by those utility companies whose locators responded to our Gopher State One Call, ticket numbers 210670287, 210670288, 210670289, 210671184, 210670566, 210670567, 210670568 and 21067194. 4.) Contact GOPHER STATE ONE CALL at 651-454-0002 (800-252-1166) for precise onsite location of utilities prior to any excavation. ZONING NOTES AREAS I.) Zoning information shown hereon is per the City of Orono, Code of Ordinance Proposed Lot I, Block I = 802,435 square feet or 18.421 acres website on December 09, 2024. Proposed Lot I, Block 2 = 128,254 square feet or 2.944 acres Dedicated right of ways = 79,309 square feet or 1.821 acres The subject property is zoned RR— I B One Family Rural Residential District Total=1,009,998 square feet or 23.186 acres The setbacks for RR— 1 B One Family Rural Residential are: Principal Building Street/Front: 50 feet Interior Side: 30 feet Side Street: 30 feet Rear/Street: 50 feet OWNER & DEVELOPER: SURVEYOR: Wetland: 25 feet or MCWD Buffer Edward H. Hamm Jr. as Trustee of Sunde Land Surveying, LLC There are conditional use permits granted on this property per City Resolution No.s the Amended and Restatement of 9001 E. Bloomington Freeway 5017, 4953 and 4972. the Trust of Edward H. Hamm Suite 118 251 South Beach Road, Hobe Sound Bloomington, MN 55420 Due to space limitations, said City Resolutions can be provided upon request. Florida 33455 Contact person: Arlee Carlson Contact person: Katie Haskins Phone: 952-881-2455 2.) Adjacent properties to the are zoned RR-19 One Family Rural Residential District. 408 St. Peter Street, Suite 434 St. Paul, MN 55102 Phone: 651-289-4794 BENCHMARKS (BM� (NAVD 88) I.) MnDOT Aluminum Alloy Rod monument "DARLEEN MN053" located NE of subject property on west side of Orono Orchard Road S Elevation = 972.767 I hereby certify that this sketch, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 23rd day of December, 2024 SUNDE LAN UR YING, LL BY:----- -- --- -- — --- Arlee J.1 Carlson, P.L. . Lic. No. 44900 Revision I By I Date JMD Drawing Title: PREL /M/NAR Y PLA T FOR. - SKY BLUE WA TERS ADD/T/ON OF 485 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD S, ORONO, MN ISSUNDE9001 Main Office: East Bloomington Freeway (35W) •Suite 118 Bloomington, Minnesota 55420-3435 LAND SURVEYING 952-881-2455 (Fax: 952-888-9526) www.sunde.corn Project:2021-030—C 19k11P9:1065130 Date: Township:117 Range.-23 Section:02 1212JI2024 File: 202/030C00/—PREPLA T. dwg Sheet: 1 of 374 Date Application Received: 01/06/2025 Date Application Considered as Complete: 01/24/2025 120-Day Review Period Expires: 05/24/2025 JON- To: From: Date: Subject: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator Melanie Curtis, Planner MCC 18 February 2025 ;bes`H o #LA25-000001, Tom Bray o/b/o Edward H. Hamm Jr., Trustee of "The Amendment and Restatement of trust of Edward H. Hamm Dated October 10, 1995" (hereinafter "The Trust") 485 Orono Orchard Road South Subdivision/Preliminary Plat: "Sky Blue Waters" + Termination of Document No. 7285795 Public Hearing Application Summary: Consider preliminary plat approval to create one additional buildable lot and termination of an existing covenant limiting development based on sewer connections. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW General Site Characteristics The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval to create one new 2+ acre buildable lot. The existing property is approximately 21.3 acres along Orono Orchard Road South, most of the land is situated north of Fox Street. The property is made up of rolling hills, wooded areas, and wetlands; it contains numerous gardens, walking paths, building improvements including a home, guest house, and two barns. The property is currently served by City sewer. All of the existing improvements are proposed to remain. A wetland delineation has been completed and the wetlands have been depicted on the preliminary plat drawing with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District ("MCWD")-required buffers are shown. The wetland delineation, attached as Exhibit F, was approved by the MCWD in August of 2021. The MCWD's approval or Notice of Decision is attached as Appendix B of the Conservation Design Report, attached as Exhibit E. Conformity with RR-1B Zoning District Standards The property is zoned RR-1B One Family Rural Residential requiring a minimum of two (2) acres per lot. The newly created parcels will conform to the current zoning district standards relating to size and width. The existing buildings and improvements on the northern lot, Lot 1, Block 1(or "11131") are proposed to remain following the Final Plat; proposed Lot 1, Block 2 (or "11132") south of Fox Street is currently vacant. New buildings must meet the required zoning district standards as no variances have been requested. The properties are within the MUSA and are proposed to be served by City sewer. 375 FILE #LA25-000001 18 February 2025 Page 2 of 4 Conformity with 2020 — 2040 Orono Community Management Plan The 2020 - 2040 Comprehensive Plan (CMP) guides the properties within the area for "Urban Estate Density Residential" at a range of 0.5 to 2.0 units per acre. The site is 23.18 acres in total area, 17.9 acres is dry, buildable, and divided by Fox Street. The plat proposes the creation of one new buildable lot. According to the policies in the CMP, this rural area is limited by the natural conditions. The property is served by City sewer and remains to be low -density. The proposed density of this 2-lot development is calculated at 0.11 units per acre for the overall, falling short of the CMP density guidance of 0.5 — 2.0 units per acre. Although the newly created lot to the south (L1B2) at 2.8 acres results in a proposed density of 0.36, under the density guidance, it cannot be subdivided further and conform to the RR-1B district standards. The northern 15.1-acre lot (1-161) is large enough to be subdivided further in the future. The proposed development provides the opportunity to meet the CMP goals with a future subdivision. Staff finds the proposed plan brings the site closer to conformance of the CMP and meets the intent of the density goals at this time. Relationship to Surrounding Development The proposed 2-lot single-family development is situated on the southern section of Orono Orchard Road and its intersection with Fox Street. The Minnetonka Bluffs neighborhood, with lots ranging in size from 0.11 to one acre, is located on the east side of Orono Orchard Road across from the subject property. The property is also surrounded by larger, wooded residential properties sized from 2 acres up to 14 acres. The development will be consistent with its residential neighbors. Rural Oasis + Conservation Design + Wetlands The applicant provided a Conservation Design Plan by Pinnacle Engineering ("CDP") for the development following the Conservation Design requirements outlined within Chapter 78, Article XII (beginning with Section. 78-1631). The Sky Blue Waters CDP is attached as Exhibit E and the development has been reviewed against the City's Rural Oasis Study. CDP provides an overview of the property's natural features, existing land uses, and wetland delineation. This portion of Fox Street was identified in the 2005 Rural Oasis Study as an edged corridor with a generally solid wall of vegetation on the roadsides with views focused down the roadway (Exhibit 1). According to the Rural Oasis study, "promoting preservation and enhancement of roadside vegetative buffers will help maintain the rural character contributed by edged enclosure. Corridor guidelines could be implemented to ensure that development adjacent to roadsides will maintain and preserve these buffers". The property consists of approximately 13 acres of planted or cultivated areas, 5.2 acres of the property is developed with impervious surfaces and mowed turf grasses; and maple basswood forests cover approximately 2 acres of the site on mostly slopes between the maintained lawns and wetland areas. No rare plant communities were observed or identified on site. According to the CDP report, the property owner does not plan to develop either of the properties at this time. City Code 82-225(b) outlines requirements for planting boulevard trees at a ratio of one deciduous tree for every 40 feet of frontage along each road. The project does not contemplate the creation of a new roadway and the existing road frontages consist of well -established tree coverage; therefore, no boulevard trees are proposed. Lot Layout + Lot Standards — RR-1B, Rural Residential The developer is proposing to split the land located south of Fox Street from the larger, northern parcel. 1_1131, north of Fox Street is 18.4 acres in gross area. Subtracting the 2.2 acres of wetlands, 0.8 acres of steep slopes, and a % acre of area encumbered by private driveway easements, the net area is proposed to be 15.13 acres. This lot contains the existing home, guest house, and outbuildings to remain. The frontage along Orono Orchard Road is approximately 1,300 feet; with approximately 300 feet of frontage, Fox Street is considered to be the "front" and a sufficient building envelope exists. 376 FILE #LA25-000001 18 February 2025 Page 3 of 4 L11132, south of Fox Street is currently 2.94 acres (gross) and includes land to be dedicated as right-of-way. The net 2.8-acre property will have ±340 feet of frontage on Fox Street and ±390 feet on Orono Orchard Road. The Fox Street frontage is the narrower of the two and is therefore considered to be the "front", and Orono Orchard Road is a side street. The proper principal building setbacks have been shown on the preliminary plat. This lot has a through driveway with one access onto Orono Orchard Road approximately 50 feet from the Dakota Rail Regional Trail managed by Three Rivers Park District. A second access is located on Fox Street, which continues northward into the shared private drive on the west side of the property. There is an existing easement over 1-1132 for driveway purposes benefitting the property at 1465 Fox Street which is proposed to remain. Utilities Stormwater The creation of one new lot does not trigger the MCWD's Stormwater Rule, no stormwater facilities will be required; the project will require payment of the City's Stormwater Drainage Trunk fee for the newly platted lot. Private Water Supply Wells The properties are currently served by and will continue to be served by private water supply wells. City Sewer The property is currently served by City sewer. In 1999, the septic systems on the property were failing, and to resolve the issue most efficiently, the City approved three sewer connections despite the property not being within the MUSA (Metropolitan Urban Service Area). This approval was granted as part of a guest house conditional use permit and the owner's willingness to sign a restrictive covenant limiting the property to three dwelling units. Copies of the resolution and covenant are attached as Exhibit J. Included with preliminary plat approval, the applicant is requesting termination of this restrictive covenant. It is contrary to standard practice to use a restrictive covenant or resolution to control density or enforce zoning regulations to govern the subdivision of a property. The City's comprehensive plan and zoning regulations are the appropriate legal tools. Fees ,'Stormwater Drainage Trunk Fee The stormwater drainage trunk fee ("SWDT fee") will be determined by the City's Fee Schedule at the time of the Final Plat submittal. According to the current 2025 Fee Schedule, the development of a property within a 2- acre residential zone requires payment of $8,060 per each new lot and/or development of a vacant lot. As proposed, the developer will be subject to payment of a SWDT fee for 1 new lot or $8,060*. ✓Park/Trail Easement + Park Fees or Dedication The Parks, Open Space, and Trail Plan chapter of the 2040 Orono Comprehensive Plan does not specify the need for a neighborhood park at this location. The City's golf course is located approximately 1/4 of a mile to the north of the property; Woodhill Country Club, a private course, is located about % mile to the east. As there is no specified need for a land dedication for a park or trail in this location, it would appear that the dedication of land for park purposes is not required. Absent the need for a land dedication, the project will be subject to the City's 2025 Park Dedication Fee. This fee is determined by the fair market value of the land being subdivided. The Hennepin County Assessor will be consulted to determine the market value of the land to establish the amount of the fee. The developer is proposing two building sites or 1 new lot. The Park Fee for this development will be approximately $8,168*. *The fee amounts will be confirmed at the time of Final Plat submittal. 377 FILE #LA25-000001 18 February 2025 Page 4 of 4 Issues for Discussion 1. No new roads are proposed and there are existing mature trees on the perimeter of the property. The Commission should discuss whether or not boulevard trees should be provided. 2. Does the Commission find the proposed plan preserves the existing rural character in the area? Does the Planning Commission agree with the Developer's findings in the Conservation Design Master Plan? If not, what is lacking? Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat. Staff further recommends the City terminate the Declaration of Subdivision Covenants dated July 9, 1999 (attached as Exhibit J) and refer to the City Code and Comprehensive Plan for guidance on development. The Planning Commission should make a MOTION to terminate the restrictive covenant and approve the preliminary plat. 378 Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 18, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 9:27 p.m. Commissioners discussed whether the easement could be needed in the future that isn't needed. Ressler moved, Brandabur seconded, to approve LA24-000070, 2195 Vacation as applied. VOTE: Ayes: 7, Nays 0. LA25-000001, TOM BRAY O/B/O EDWARD H. HA ORCHARD ROAD SOUTH, PRELIMINARY PLAT TERMINATION OF COVENANT. The Planning Commission is requested to review the S approve a new preliminary plat creating one additional The Planning Commission discussed the Edina, an attorney for Edward Hamm. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 9:48 Jamin Marks, 1570 Fox, materials for the meeting Commissioners said the never be buildaki0whnn approve a request bering land Road, Easement ORONO 'presentation, and discuss and terminating a covenant. and the applicant, Tom Bray, of the property and said lFox Street runs through the property and it would northern and a southern. Bollis was opposed to Ed, to approve LA25-000001, Orono Orchard Road aters And Termination of Covenant. VOTE: Ayes: 6, 155 WEAR LANE NORTH, VARIANCES Kion is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and a new covered stoop to control water getting into the house. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff and the applicants, John Daly Stonewood, Wayzata and Ross Johnson, 155 Wear Lane, the homeowner. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 10:09 p.m. There were no public comments. Page 5 of 8 379 TERMINATION OF DECLARATION OF SUBDIVISION COVENANTS RECITALS: WHEREAS, Edward H Hamm Jr., as trustee of the Amendment and Restatement of Trust of Edward H Hamm dated October 10th 1995, (the "Trustee") is the owner of the real property legally described on the attached Exhibit A (the "Property"). WHEREAS, the Property is subject to a Declaration of Subdivision Covenants dated July 9th 1999 and recorded in the office of the Hennepin County Recorder on April 14th 2000 as Document No. 7285795 (the "Declaration"). WHEREAS, Section 4 of the declaration states: This Declaration may be amended, altered or terminated only with the written consent of the City, provided that the City may, by resolution of the City Council of Orono, modify or waive any of the provisions or restrictions hereof with respect to the Property or any subdivided lot thereof, upon the request of the owner of the Property, or such subdivided lot thereof. WHEREAS, the City of Orono (the "City") and the Trustee desire to terminate the Declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the Trustee Agreement as follows: TERMINATION: 1. Upon the recording of this instrument in the office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles, the Declaration is terminated and of no further force. 2. Attached as Exhibit B is a Resolution of the City Council of the City authorizing the Mayor and City to execute this Termination of Declaration of Subdivision Covenants and to deliver it to the Trustee for recording. 1 171463453v1 380 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The City has executed this Termination of Declaration of Subdivision Covenants as of 2025. CITY OF ORONO, a Minnesota Municipal corporation By: Printed Name: Its: Mayor: _ By: Printed Name: Its: Mayor: _ STATE OF ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2025 by the and of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation. Notary Public S-1 day of and 171463453v1 381 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Trustee has executed this Termination of Declaration of Subdivision Covenants as of 2025. Edward H Hamm Jr., as trustee of the Amendment and Restatement of Trust of Edward H Hamm dated October loth 1995 By: Printed Name: Edward H. Hamm, Jr., Trustee STATE OF ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2025 by Edward H. Hamm, Jr, as trustee of the Edward H Hamm Jr., as trustee of the Amendment and Restatement of Trust of Edward H Hamm dated October loth 1995. DRAFTED BY: Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, LLP (TLB) 2200 IDS Center 80 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-2157 Notary Public S-2 171463453v1 382 F,XHIRTT A (Legal Description of the Property) That part of Government Lot 4 and the Southwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of Government Lot 4, distant 434.3 feet South of the Northeast corner thereof, designated as Point A; thence Northwesterly deflecting to the right from said East line 101 degrees 43 minutes, a distance of 182 feet; thence Northwesterly 60 feet along a curve to the right with a radius of 4687.5 feet; thence Northwesterly 200 feet along a curve to the right with a radius of 222.45 feet; thence Northerly 175 feet along a curve to the right with a radius of 237.56 feet; thence Northerly 50 feet along a curve to the right with a radius of 527.42 feet; thence Northeasterly to a point on the North line of Government Lot 4, distant 360 feet West of the Northeast corner thereof designated as Point B; thence northeasterly 55.51 feet along a line which forms an angle of 68 degrees 40 minutes 08 seconds with said North line of Government Lot 4; thence northerly 100.00 feet along a tangential curve concave to the west having a radius of 181.40 feet and a central angle of 31 degrees 35 minutes 07 seconds; thence northwesterly 125.00 feet along a compound curve concave to the west having a radius of 283.70 feet and a central angle of 25 degrees 14 minutes 42 seconds; thence northwesterly on a line tangent to last described curve 267.40 feet; thence northwesterly deflecting 02 degrees 23 minutes 00 seconds to the left from last described course 123.34 feet; thence northwesterly 104.40 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 164.00 feet and a central angle of 36 degrees 28 minutes 30 seconds, to a point on the west line of the East One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 2, exclusive of the highway (33 feet wide) upon the easterly side thereof, said East One -Half being ascertained after taking from the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said section said highway upon the easterly side, and which is 636.66 feet north from the Southwest corner of said East One -Half so ascertained; thence north along said west line of the East One -Half so ascertained 679.66 feet to the northwest corner thereof; thence east along the north line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 2 to the northeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2; thence south along the east line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2 and Government Lot 4 to the point of beginning. Also that part of said West One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2 exclusive of highway (33 feet wide) on the easterly side thereof, said West One -Half being ascertained after taking from said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2 said highway upon the easterly side; lying easterly of Macmillan Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof and northerly of a line and its westerly extension described as commencing at the northeast corner of said West One- Half so ascertained; thence on an assumed bearing of South 00 degrees 17 minutes 01 seconds East, along the east line of said West One -Half so ascertained 679.85 feet, more or less to a point 636.66 feet north of the southeast corner of said West One -Half, said point being the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence deflecting right at an angle of 83 degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds on a line bearing South 83 degrees 35 minutes 59 seconds West 33.68 feet; thence South 82 degrees 23 minutes 59 seconds West 66.32 feet to the most southerly southeast corner of Outlot C, said Macmillan Addition and said line there terminating. Together with a non-exclusive easement for driveway purposes over, under and across part of Outlot C and Lot 2, Block 1, MacMillan Addition and the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 17, Range 23, as described in the Private Road Agreement recorded January 14, 1930 as Document No. A1579568 and amended in the Agreement Regarding Correction of Easement Legal Description recorded June 19, 2018 as Document Nos. Al0563491 and T5538418. Together with a non-exclusive easement for driveway purposes over that part of Government Lot 4, Section 2, Township 117, Range 23 lying Northerly and Easterly of a line and its extension drawn parallel with and 8 feet distant Southerly and Westerly from the line between Point A and Point B measured at right angles and radially to said line between Point A and Point B as contained in instrument recorded in CR Book 1643 of Deeds, page 333, Doc. No. 2295932. (See Order Doc. No. 6076705). A-1 1714634530 383 EXHIBIT A (City Council Resolution) A-1 171463453v1 384 AGENDA ITEM Date: March 10, 2025 Item: 27 Title: Agreement for Standby Public Works Service to Minnetonka Beach Presenter: Adam Edwards, City Administrator / Engineer Section: City Administrator/Engineer Report Purpose: The purpose of this item is to approve an agreement with Minnetonka Beach for Orono Public Works to provide standby/on-call service. 2. Background: Minnetonka Beach and Orono staff have been in discussions about formalizing an agreement for public works support. Minnetonka Beach has one full time public works employee. When that employee is out on vacation or sick time they have reached out to Orono public works to assist with emergency callouts or locates. The attached agreement formalizes that support and establishes fees for service. The agreement calls for Orono to provide on -call public works support to Minnetonka Beach during periods of absence by the public works employee. It further establishes the rates for on -call, regular time, and overtime. Staff engaged with local 49 International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE), who represent Orono public works and parks employees and agreed to adjust compensation to workers who are on call when Orono is providing coverage to Minnetonka Beach. 3. Cost: Cost associated with this service are passed through to Minnetonka Beach. 4. Staff Recommendation: I recommend approval. The agreement has been reviewed by staff and city attorney for both cities. Minnetonka Beach will be considering this agreement for approval at their March IOth council meeting as well. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Move to approve the Agreement for Standby Service at exhibit A. Exhibits A. Orono MB agreement for standby service 385 AGREEMENT FOR STANDBY SERVICE This AGREEMENT (the "Agreement"), is made and entered into this day of 2025 (the "Effective Date") by and between the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("Orono") and the City of the Village of Minnetonka Beach, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("Minnetonka Beach"), made under and by virtue of Minnesota Statutes, section 471.59. WHEREAS, Minnetonka Beach is desirous of contracting with Orono for the performance of the hereinafter specified maintenance and inspection services; and WHEREAS, Orono is able and willing to render such services to Minnetonka Beach on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. Purpose — The purpose of this Agreement is for Orono to provide standby and back-up public works services ("Services") for Minnetonka Beach on the following terms and conditions. 2. Scope and Quality of Services — The level and quality of Services rendered to Minnetonka Beach by Orono shall be the same as the level of services rendered by Orono within its jurisdiction, except as hereinafter stated. The Services shall include the inspection of Minnetonka Beach's lift stations, sewer collection system, water distribution system, and water treatment plant and, when there is an immediate necessity, the maintenance and repair of said public infrastructure facilities. The Services shall be performed by Orono's public works personnel or, when essential, by independent contractors hired by Orono. 3. Administration Procedures — This section is set forth to clarify the responsibilities of each party and to establish procedures for performing the Services. A. Responsibilities of Minnetonka Beach (1). Maintain and make available to Orono all information necessary to perform the Services. (2). Pay Orono all amounts due hereunder in a timely fashion, together with the cost of repair, parts and material supplied by Orono and the charges of independent contractors hired by Orono. (3). Train Orono personnel on Minnetonka Beach's public infrastructure facilities, to the extent deemed necessary by Minnetonka Beach, at a time to be agreed upon by both parties. Training of Orono personnel performing Services for Minnetonka Beach shall be the responsibility of Minnetonka Beach, or its consultants, and regular time rates shall be paid by Minnetonka Beach to Orono for personnel training hours. 386 B. Responsibilities of Orono (1). Perform inspections and maintenance of Minnetonka Beach's lift stations, sewer collection system, water distribution system, and water treatment plant as necessary and, subject to the requirements of this paragraph, perform or contract for emergency repairs costing up to $15,000 without additional specific authorization from Minnetonka Beach. Notification of said repair shall be made by Orono as soon as possible to Minnetonka Beach staff. All such maintenance or repair shall be performed only when Orono determines, in the exercise of prudent judgment, that immediate maintenance or repairs are required. Non -emergency maintenance or repairs shall be deferred such that they may be performed by employees or contractors of Minnetonka Beach during their regular working hours. (2). Provide inspection reports, time sheets, invoices, receipts, and other information for the permanent records kept by Minnetonka Beach. (3). At the request of Minnetonka Beach, inspect all work done on the lift stations, sewer collection system, water distribution system, and water treatment plant performed by others. (4). The above Services will be provided by Orono to Minnetonka Beach when Minnetonka Beach personnel are not available or as otherwise requested by Minnetonka Beach and agreed by Orono. 4. Administration Responsibility — Services rendered to Minnetonka Beach shall be performed in a responsible manner under the direction of Orono. The manner and means of performing the Services are to be determined by Orono, except as specifically provided to the contrary in this Agreement. Orono shall submit to Minnetonka Beach a monthly report of Services rendered and charges due in such detail as Minnetonka Beach may reasonably require, as well as periodic suggestions related to the Services. 5. Personnel, Employees of Orono — Orono shall assume all obligations with regard to the salary, workers' compensation, PERA, withholding tax, health insurance, and other benefits of its employees performing the Services. Minnetonka Beach shall not be considered or deemed to be the employer of any Orono employees providing Services under this Agreement and shall have none of the responsibilities or obligations which arise out of the employer -employee relationship with respect to personnel assigned by Orono to provide Services hereunder. 6. Cooperation and Assistance — Minnetonka Beach shall provide full cooperation and assistance to Orono, its agents and employees in rendering of the Services. 7. Effective Date of Service — This Agreement shall begin on the Effective Date and shall remain until terminated as provided in paragraph 8. 8. Termination of Agreement — This Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until terminated by either party. Notice of termination may be submitted in writing by either party to the other party. If notice of termination is properly given, this Agreement shall terminate as of the date set forth in the notice, which shall not in any event be less than 60 days from the date of said 387 notice. Any amounts due to Orono shall become immediately due and payable on the date this Agreement terminates. Any notice required or made under this Agreement shall be made by personal delivery or by certified United States mail, postage paid and addressed to: a) If to Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Attn: City Administrator a) If to Minnetonka Beach 2945 Westwood Road, PO Box 146 Minnetonka Beach, MN 55361 Attn: City Administrator or to such other person or at such other address as either party may notify the other in accordance with this paragraph. 9. Cost to Minnetonka Beach — For and in consideration of the rendition of the Services, Minnetonka Beach shall make payments to Orono as follows: A. Straight time rates will apply for all Services rendered between the hours of 7:00 a.m. — 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. B. Overtime rates will apply for all Services rendered during hours other than as noted in paragraph 9(A) and 9(C). C. Holiday rates will apply for all Services rendered on holidays as set forth in the then current Orono personnel policy manual. All rates are as specified in Exhibit A attached hereto. D. In addition to the payments required above, Minnetonka Beach shall pay a daily charge for fixed costs for each day Orono performs any Services under this Agreement. The daily fixed cost is set forth in Exhibit A. E. All rates set forth in Exhibit A are subject to change annually on the first of the year by a percentage equal to the wage increase for that year payable under the union contract covering Orono's public works employees. The minimum percentage increase shall be no less than 1% and a maximum no greater than 5% in any single year, with the increase amount being added to the prior year's rate. Orono shall bill Minnetonka Beach within 15 days after the last day of each month for Services rendered during the previous month and Minnetonka Beach shall remit payment to Orono within 35 days of the receipt of the invoice. 10. Insurance — Orono shall maintain workers' compensation insurance as required by law covering its own personal and public liability insurance in the amount of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Orono shall furnish Minnetonka Beach with a certificate of insurance as to the 388 policies in force. In addition, Orono shall require any independent contractors providing Services to Minnetonka Beach under this Agreement to procure and maintain insurance with limits of liability not less than those provided herein and name Minnetonka Beach as an additional insured. 11. Distribution of Property — Any property belonging to or acquired by either parry shall remain the property of that party, until and unless ownership of the property is transferred by sale, donation, or other means memorialized in writing. 12. Indemnification - Each party shall defend and hold harmless the other party from any claims arising from any act or omission on the part of its own officers, employees, agents, contractors or representatives pursuant to this Agreement, including any attorney's fees and expenses incurred in defending any such claim. Nothing herein shall change or waive liability limits available to Orono and Minnetonka Beach under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. The limits of liability for both parties may not be added together to increase the maximum statutory liability limits for either party. 13. Miscellaneous A. Non -Discrimination. The parties are committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, or sexual orientation. B. Data Practices. Both parties shall comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13. The city clerk in each city shall be the Responsible Authority for that party for any requests for data arising out of this Agreement or Services performed hereunder. Minnetonka Beach shall immediately forward any request for data arising out of this Agreement to Orono. C. Relationship of the Parties. Nothing in this Agreement will be deemed to create an agency, employment, partnership or fiduciary relationship between the parties. Except as specifically provided herein, neither parry is the representative of the other party for any purpose and neither party has the power or authority to represent, act for, bind or otherwise create or assume any obligation on behalf of the other party for any purpose whatsoever. D. Applicable Laws. This Agreement shall be interpreted under and in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. E. Assignment. Neither party to this Agreement may assign its interest in the Agreement without prior written approval of the other parry and subject to such conditions and provisions as the other party may deem necessary. F. Entire Agreement. This Agreement shall constitute the entire agreement of the parties and shall supersede all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter herein. 389 G. Amendment. Any amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when reduced to writing and signed by the parties. H. Severability. If any term of this Agreement is found to be void or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining terms of this Agreement, which shall continue in full force and effect. I. Authorship. This Agreement was drafted mutually by Orono and Minnetonka Beach. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement effective the date first written above. Date: Date: Date: Date: City of Orono Mayor City Clerk City of the Village of Minnetonka Beach Mayor City Clerk 390 EXHIBIT A 2025 Rates for Services Fixed Standby Charge: $65.83 per day on weekdays and $131.66 per day on weekends and holidays Employee Straight Time Rate ( er hour) Over Time/ Holiday Rate (per hour) Public Works $ 65.83 $ 87.09 Supervisor / Public Utilities Supervisor Public Works $ 52.50 $ 78.75 Maintenance/ Utility Worker 391 AGENDA ITEM Date: March 10, 2025 Title: Council Committee and Board Reports Presenter: Adam Edwards, City Administrator / Engineer Section: Committee Reports Item: 28 Purpose: The purpose of the agenda item is for Orono council members to update one another on recent council committee or board meetings. 2. Last Meeting: A. The Long Lake Fire Advisory Board met on March 5th. 3. Members: A. Long Lake Fire Advisory Board • Council Members. Bob Tunheim, (Absent) & Steve Persian (Absent) • City Staff Members. Adam Edwards and Chief James VanEyll. • Other Member Entities. City of Long Lake (Lead), City of Medina, and City of Minnetonka Beach COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Discussion item - no formal action required. Exhibits A. 2025-03-05 FAB Pkt 392 AGENDA Long Lake Fire Department Fire Advisory Meeting March 5, 2025 4:00 pm — 5:00 pm Long Lake Fire Station 1 340 Willow Drive N Orono, MN Representatives: Long Lake Orono Medina Minnetonka Beach Scott Weske Adam Edwards Erin Barnhart Jennifer Halverson Jahn Dyvik Steve Persian Jason Nelson Heidi Honey Todd Newcomer Bob Tunheim Dino Deslauriers Mike Heiland James Van Eyll Welcome & Introductions Topics Receive Minutes of October 23, 2024 Fire Advisory Board Meeting Review Unaudited December 2024 / Year End Expenses Review Operating Expenses as of Year to Date Review Duty Crew Report for December 2024 and January 2025 Discuss PT Duty Crews Establish Next Meeting Date Other Topics Any Additional Topics 393 Fire Advisory Board Meeting Meeting Minutes October 23, 2024 Roll Call of Attendees The meeting was called by Fire Chief Mike Heiland. Please note that members in attendance: Long Lake Orono Medina Minnetonka Beach Scott Weske Maria Veach Jason Nelson Jennifer Halverson Mike Heiland James Van Eyll Erin Barnhart Charlie Miner Adam Edwards Dino Deslauriers Jahn Dyvik Cody Farley Welcome & Introductions Topics Receive Minutes of August 7, 2024 Fire Advisory Board Meeting Received. 2024 Operating Expenses as of September LLFD Chief Heiland stated the budget is over on trucks and noted that they have also had to put a lot money into the building over the last few months as well such as the roof, HVAC system, parking lot lights, and necessary repairs to the generator. He explained that despite those numbers, he was confident that they would be able to come in at, or under, budget at year-end. Mr. Edwards asked a question about training materials being up by 370%. Mr. Weske explained that a lot of those costs were related to the new firefighters so much of that will be reimbursed through the MBFTE. He noted that there was a few car fire simulator training events held at each station so that was also a net line item. Mr. Miner asked about the software support line item that shows an increase of 155%. Mr. Weske stated that was for the Lexipol and First Due would be included in that line item. LLFD Chief Heiland stated that there were about 7 radios that were nearing the end of their life so they will most likely start leasing them in the future. Mr. Dyvik stated that the LLFD was already leasing some of the radios and asked if they would eventually lease all of the radios. Mr. Miner asked if the lease would also include maintenance. Section 2A. 394 Fire Advisory Subcommittee Minutes October 23, 2024 - Page 2 LLFD Chief Heiland stated that they would lease the radios which would include maintenance. Mr. Miner asked if the County had communicated to them a deadline for dropping them off because after a certain point they would no longer be operational. LLFD Chief Heiland stated that the ones they are using right now, they cannot get parts for anymore. He stated that they are essentially in good shape, but by the end of the year they would like to upgrade before they start falling apart. Section 2A. Mr. Nelson stated that for certain batches of radios in the police department, the end of 2026 is their end of life that they have been told to prepare for and explained that these were new radios that they had just purchased about 2 years ago. Mr. Dyvik asked where the LLFD was with number of calls compared with last year. LLFD Chief Heiland stated that he would cover that in the next agenda item. Duty Crew Report for August and September LLFD Chief Heiland stated that for duty crews in August they were at 51 % staffed and had 8 calls. He noted that on Saturdays they have only been getting their morning shifts filled and have been discussing the possibility of adding a weeknight and eliminating the Saturday afternoon duty crew shifts. He noted that he had added a row to the table that outlined the probation numbers. Mr. Dyvik stated that when they started this there was a question about whether or not they should have Saturdays at all. He stated that his recollection was that LLFD Chief Heiland wanted to have Saturdays as an option, so people who could not participate on duty crews during the week due to their jobs would have the option of participating on Saturday. He stated he would agree that they should probably go ahead and revisit that issue. LLFD Chief Heiland stated that the data has shown that Saturday afternoon duty crew shifts are pretty much a bust which is why they were considering opening up Thursday evenings instead. Mr. Dyvik asked if Thursday evening would be the busiest. LLFD Chief Heiland stated that Friday night is probably the busiest, but it may be more of a challenge to fill the duty crews on a Friday as well. He stated that the month of September was a lighter month with 37.9% of the shifts filled and only 2 calls on duty shifts. He noted that he felt the data gave them a snapshot of the shifts and the probationary shifts and explained that that, in September, they had a total of 66 shifts filled. Mr. Dyvik asked if any of the calls were Saturday calls. LLFD Chief Heiland stated that they were not Saturday calls. He answered Mr. Dyvik's earlier question about the number of calls and stated that as of today they had responded to 374 calls and last year at this time they were at 421 calls, so there have been 47 less calls in 2024 than 2023. He stated that there was one member who came off of probation at last month's business meeting and stated that they have 2 firefighters that are either currently taking Firefighter 1 or will begin soon. He noted that there are 2 firefighters who will also be starting the EMR/EMT training. He stated that they have one additional member who got his fingerprints done today F;195 Fire Advisory Subcommittee Minutes October 23, 2024 - Page 3 Section 2A. and explained that they were hoping they would be able to get him started in the class beginning October 23, 2024. He stated that one firefighter had resigned who started with the Department in October of 2019 and had joined the Mound Fire Department. He stated that they had also received their new engine from the Excelsior Fire District on October 21, 2024, which will be going in for graphics on October 28, 2024. He noted that the engine had been used last weekend at the Hennepin Tech FAO training that took place at the station and would also be used for their next training date as well. He explained that the Excelsior Fire District had also offered to sell the LLFD the headsets, extrication tools, and 4 task force nozzles. He stated that they were able to negotiate the price and settled on an additional $4,000 for those pieces of equipment. He stated that hose testing has almost been completed and the LLFD was also part of Muskie Mayhem which is a really cool event for wounded veterans. He stated that the LLFD cooks them breakfast and the auxiliary packs them bag lunches. Mr. Dyvik asked if there was a better way to compare the call numbers from 2023 and 2024 that would reflect taking out the Navarre area, since that was taken out on July 1, 2024. LLFD Chief Heiland stated that it was a difference of 47 calls since July. Ms. Veach stated that based on their weekly reports she thinks that their numbers were pretty close to that number. Mr. Dyvik stated that if that was the case then the LLFD was on par with last year's numbers then. Mr. Edwards noticed that in both reports he has seen, there was a huge drop off in the numbers for last month. Mr. Van Eyll stated that was fairly consistent because June, July, and August were typically the busier months and then everything starts dropping down a bit in September and October. Mr. Dyvik stated that for the August duty crew data, the last call had an in-service time of 3:47 and asked why that was much longer than the others. LLFD Chief Heiland stated that generally, that means that they were waiting for another crew member to arrive. Mr. Dyvik stated that it was also marked `no' for whether it was an emergency and asked what determined whether a call was an emergency or not. LLFD Chief Heiland explained that was determined by the nature of a call details. Mr. Dyvik noted that without that one outlier, their in-service times would have averaged under 2 minutes. Draft 2025 Capital Improvement Plan Mr. Weske reviewed the discussion from the last Fire Advisory Board meeting regarding the replacement of Utility 11 and the boat. He stated that they had essentially pulled the boat for 2026 because the numbers didn't look like they would work under operational. He explained that the Long Lake City Council had approved the reimbursement to the cities if they contribute. He noted that the resolution and minutes were forwarded to Mr. Edwards at Orono. F;196 Fire Advisory Subcommittee Minutes Section 2A. October 23, 2024 - Page 4 Mr. Edwards noted that he would be bringing this up for discussion at their upcoming work session meeting with the Orono City Council. Mr. Weske highlighted the other things included on the 2025-2042 CIP and noted that with all of the things have been juggled the last few years, this is their best guess for these items. Mr. Dyvik asked what would happen with the old Engine 11 and if they would put it up for auction. LLFD Chief Heiland stated that they could offer it to Orono or the other cities, but did not think they would be interested. Mr. Weske stated that they would work through the process of confirming that Orono or Medina did not want to purchase it and would then move forward to sell it. LLFD Chief Heiland noted that it will be a good time to sell a used engine because the lead time for buying a new engine is up to around 3 years. Mr. Weske clarified that they would not commit to selling the old engine until they were fully up and running with the new engine and knew that they would not need it. Mr. Dyvik asked what year the old engine was. Mr. Weske stated that he believed it was a 2004 engine. Ms. Veach asked what would happen when it was sold and if it would be considered a shared piece of equipment. Mr. Weske stated that it would be a shared piece of equipment. He stated that, for example, if the engine sold for $100,000, Orono would get $77,000. Ms. Veach asked if the cities would need to agree on the sales price. Mr. Weske stated that the market will end up dictating the sales price. LLFD Chief Heiland noted that in the past when they have been sold at auction, he has been pleasantly surprised by what they ended up getting. He stated that he feels that they can get quite a bit more for them when they are sold at auction. Mr. Weske stated that he felt it was important to have a detailed itemized list of all the attachments and equipment included. Ms. Veach stated that there was extrication equipment that came with the new engine for $4,000 but she still sees extrication equipment included on the CIP. LLFD Chief Heiland explained that the extrication equipment that came with the new engine is the hydraulic equipment that is pretty much obsolete nowadays but they would be able to use it for training purposes so they aren't beating up their other equipment. Mr. Dyvik noted that the extrication equipment Ms. Veach was referring to was listed in 2032, so it was 8 years out. F;197 Fire Advisory Subcommittee Minutes October 23, 2024 - Page 5 Ms. Veach stated that she thought it was listed in the CIP twice, once in 2032 and the other in 2038. Mr. Weske stated that he would expect these dollar amounts to change because they don't know what technology will be like in the future, for example, with the battery life/power. Ms. Veach asked if there were plans for building renovations or investments in the next fifteen years. Mr. Weske stated that had not been included, but agreed that there should probably be some discussions. He noted that they were mostly looking at the next 3-5 years. LLFD Chief Heiland noted that he had been told by the roof guys that they should start thinking about replacing the roof in 2029. Mr. Weske noted that they do an inspection and needed repairs to the roof every year. LLFD Chief Heiland stated that the roof is one of the hard tar type roofs, so as long as they do regular repair and maintenance, they last longer than the rubber membrane types, but agreed that they would eventually need to install a new roof. Ms. Veach stated that she understands that CIPs are just a plan and they have to vote on them. She explained that this was the first CIP she had seen here and asked if it would come to the city councils for a vote and then they vote again to approve equipment. Mr. Edwards explained that he would bring the Orono City Council the CIP for them to approve the plan, and then he would also bring an item for separate council action when there are individual purchases. Ms. Veach asked how it would come to the Orono City Council since it was already purchased. Mr. Edwards stated that it would still be the same because they would be asking the council to approve an expenditure. Mr. Dyvik noted that Orono's process is a bit different than the way the contract was written. He explained that the way the contract was written it says that once a CIP is approved, that serves as authorization to purchase the equipment. Ms. Veach noted that last year there was no approval and yet, the engine was purchased. Mr. Dyvik stated that they were not asking for the engine. He clarified that this was for Utility 11 that they will get sometime in February. Mr. Veach stated that she thought they were referring to the engine that was just delivered. LLFD Chief Heiland stated that he had been told that they may be able to have delivery of the utility vehicle as early as December of 2024. Mr. Miner stated that the Orono City Council would have a work session next week, but asked if the Council would also vote on this issue that night as well. Section 2A. 17;98 Fire Advisory Subcommittee Minutes October 23, 2024 - Page 6 Mr. Edwards explained that normally they vote on their CIP in the month of December. He stated that they will discuss this item at their next work session and then he would follow up with his council sometime in November about approval for procurement. Mr. Dyvik clarified that Mr. Edwards would let the Orono City Council know that Long Lake had stated that they would buy the vehicle out at the end of the contract. Mr. Edwards acknowledged that he had that information included in his briefing notes for the work session. Shared Services Other Topics Mr. Dyvik stated that if LLFD Chief Heiland makes a decision to adjust the duty crew shifts and eliminate the Saturday afternoon shift, he would like it to be a time that is more beneficial. Section 2A. LLFD Chief Heiland stated that they will float it out to their membership in order to see what may work best for them. Mr. Miner stated that this should be the Fire Advisory Board's last meeting in 2024. Mr. Dyvik asked if their next meeting would be in February or March of 2025. Mr. Miner stated that he believed that the meeting would usually be around that time. Mr. Weske stated that they may want to do it a bit earlier because they will have their final budget numbers. He explained that he felt that they would want to do it closer to the time that the audits were completed, so everyone will know where they are at with the budget. Wrap -Up / Adjourn LLFD Chief Heiland adjourned the meeting at 4:34 p.m. 1;399 LONG LAKE, MN Monthly Exp/Rev Accounts -FD 2024 2024 %YTD DECEMBER Account Descr Budget YTD Amt Budget 2024 Amt I R 205-33402 FD Training Grants $0.00 $12,977.50 0.00% $0.00 R 205-33420 Fire Relief Assoc 2% State Aid $155,000.00 $206,604.26 133.29% $0.00 R 205-34210 Orono Fire Capital Funding $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 R 205-34212 Orono Fire Contract Revenue $629,351.00 $629,351.00 100.00% $0.00 R 205-34213 Long Lake Fire Capital Funding $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 R 205-34214 Long Lake Fire ContractRevenu $94,747.00 $94,747.00 100.00% $0.00 R 205-34215 Medina Fire Capital Funding $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 R 205-34217 Medina Fire ContractRevenue $60,232.00 $60,232.00 100.00% $0.00 R 205-34218 Minnetonka Beach contract rev $61,614.00 $61,614.00 100.00% $0.00 R 205-34220 FD Other Non -Contract Revenu $0.00 $7,557.30 0.00% $0.00 R 205-34951 Rent - Fire Dept. $4,700.00 $5,352.86 113.89% $423.14 R 205-36230 Contributions and Donations $0.00 $2,500.00 0.00% $0.00 R 205-39100 Sales of Land/Capital Assets $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $1,005,644.00 $1,080,935.92 107.49% $423.14 42280 Fire Dept Administration E 205-42280-1000 FT Admin Office Salaries $112,000.00 $113,012.77 100.90% $11,726.21 E 205-42280-1055 FD Duty Crew Pay $59,280.00 $50,050.00 84.43% $7,000.00 E 205-42280-1060 Navarre Fire Call Pay $45,877.00 $21,628.30 47.14% $3,630.80 E 205-42280-1065 Fire Call Pay $58,981.00 $69,204.30 117.33% $13,192.95 E 205-42280-1075 Fire Fighter Training Pay $63,774.00 $41,527.49 65.12% $6,627.81 E 205-42280-1080 Fire Officer Pay $21,638.00 $21,160.43 97.79% $3,707.12 E 205-42280-1130 Insurance Opt Out Pay $14,500.00 $15,295.27 105.48% $1,564.39 E 205-42280-1210 PERA $21,500.00 $19,997.10 93.01% $2,075.54 E 205-42280-1220 FICA $15,000.00 $17,437.05 116.25% $2,806.67 E 205-42280-1310 Employer Paid Health $985.00 $988.80 100.39% $63.00 E 205-42280-1510 Workers Comp Insurance $44,000.00 $38,338.67 87.13% $250.00 E 205-42280-2010 Office Supplies $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42280-2030 Printed Forms $500.00 $184.63 36.93% $0.00 E 205-42280-2080 Training/Instruct Material $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42280-2175 Fire Prevention Materials $1,500.00 $1,465.98 97.73% $0.00 E 205-42280-2410 Fire Department Uniform $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42280-3000 Professional Srvs $3,000.00 $1,362.27 45.41% $0.00 E 205-42280-3010 Auditing and Actg Servic $6,200.00 $5,000.00 80.65% $1,000.00 E 205-42280-3090 Software Support $6,000.00 $9,349.62 155.83% -$5,167.20 E 205-42280-3110 W.A.F.T.A $2,000.00 $2,000.00 100.00% $0.00 E 205-42280-3120 Legal Fees - Civil $2,000.00 $4,150.63 207.53% $0.00 E 205-42280-3150 LL Admin Fee $18,000.00 $18,000.00 100.00% $0.00 E 205-42280-3230 Cell Phones $500.00 $534.00 106.80% $54.00 E 205-42280-3310 Travel / Mileage Reimb $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42280-3350 Education / Conferences $4,500.00 $5,589.20 124.20% $0.00 E 205-42280-3355 Motor Vehicle Lic & Reg $100.00 $59.25 59.25% $0.00 E 205-42280-3610 General Liability Ins $9,500.00 $10,275.00 108.16% $0.00 E 205-42280-4045 Insurance Claim Expense $250.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42280-4135 Copier Maintenance $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42280-4300 Miscellaneous $1,500.00 $303.58 20.24% $63.14 E 205-42280-4330 Dues and Subscriptions $2,750.00 $2,410.58 87.66% $14.99 E 205-42280-4450 Food & Beverage(Mtgs/ $1,500.00 $1,372.67 91.51% $84.78 E 205-42280-4600 Recognition Expenditures $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42280-5710 Computer/Printer Replac $4,650.00 $1,079.67 23.22% $0.00 E 205-42280-5800 Other Equipment $4,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 42280 Fire Dept Administration $525,985.00 $471,777.26 89.69% $48,694.20 03/03/ Section 28. Page 1 1:400 Account Descr 2024 Budget 2024 YTD Amt %YTD Budget DECEMBER 2024 Amt 1 03/03/ Section 28. Page 2 42281 Fire Dept Operations E 205-42281-1055 FD Duty Crew Pay $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42281-1065 Fire Call Pay $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42281-1075 Fire Fighter Training Pay $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42281-1220 FICA $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42281-1310 Employer Paid Health $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42281-2010 Office Supplies $750.00 $1,106.71 147.56% $0.00 E 205-42281-2080 Training/Instruct Material $500.00 $1,202.15 240.43% $0.00 E 205-42281-2120 Motor Fuels $11,500.00 $9,334.18 81.17% $455.85 E 205-42281-2150 Shop Supplies $1,500.00 $1,371.01 91.40% $15.43 E 205-42281-2160 Chemicals and Chem Pro $750.00 $865.29 115.37% $0.00 E 205-42281-2190 Medical Supplies $2,000.00 $2,430.54 121.53% $0.00 E 205-42281-2210 Equipment Parts $2,000.00 $11,066.57 553.33% $6,573.91 E 205-42281-2215 SCBA Equipment Parts $400.00 $450.00 112.50% $0.00 E 205-42281-2400 Small Tools and Minor Eq $2,800.00 $1,200.09 42.86% $0.00 E 205-42281-2410 Fire Department Uniform $5,500.00 $5,128.83 93.25% $3,003.95 E 205-42281-2415 Turn Out Gear $20,000.00 $13,063.54 65.32% $0.00 E 205-42281-3000 Professional Srvs $4,000.00 $562.50 14.06% $0.00 E 205-42281-3050 Physicals / Other Medical $8,500.00 $8,624.00 101.46% $2,716.00 E 205-42281-3225 Truck Communication Se $3,250.00 $5,461.79 168.06% $1,127.33 E 205-42281-3230 Cell Phones $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42281-3235 Cty 800mhz Radio Admin $12,000.00 $10,999.34 91.66% $2,120.66 E 205-42281-3280 Pagers/Radios Repairs & $750.00 $1,486.35 198.18% $0.00 E 205-42281-3285 Radio Lease $4,100.00 $3,601.01 87.83% $688.08 E 205-42281-3310 Travel / Mileage Reimb $700.00 $977.70 139.67% $0.00 E 205-42281-3350 Education/ Conferences $12,000.00 $6,872.27 57.27% $0.00 E 205-42281-4030 Light Truck Maint & Repa $5,000.00 $2,230.11 44.60% $57.77 E 205-42281-4035 Heavy Truck Maint & Rep $12,000.00 $21,290.64 177.42% $0.00 E 205-42281-4040 Equip Maint & Repair $3,000.00 $3,018.12 100.60% $541.86 E 205-42281-4600 Recognition Expenditures $500.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 42281 Fire Dept Operations $113,500.00 $112,342.74 98.98% $17,300.84 42282 Willow Stn Facility Costs E 205-42282-2230 Bldg & Grnds Maint Supp $750.00 $647.89 86.39% $0.00 E 205-42282-3000 Professional Srvs $750.00 $691.90 92.25% $62.90 E 205-42282-3275 Internet Access (Mediaco $8,300.00 $5,665.49 68.26% $445.46 E 205-42282-3810 Electricity Expense $12,500.00 $9,954.99 79.64% $1,680.13 E 205-42282-3820 City Utilities (Wat,Sew,St $3,100.00 $3,429.04 110.61% $742.90 E 205-42282-3830 Natural Gas Expense $8,000.00 $5,161.81 64.52% $1,455.90 E 205-42282-3840 Custodial & Waste Remo $9,000.00 $8,916.00 99.07% $692.03 E 205-42282-3845 Lawn & Turf Maintenanc $2,100.00 $1,430.00 68.10% $0.00 E 205-42282-4010 Bldg Maint & Repairs $16,000.00 $28,237.81 176.49% $792.00 42282 Willow Stn Facility Costs $60,500.00 $64,134.93 106.01% $5,871.32 42283 FD Non -Operational Costs E 205-42283-1240 State Fire Aid Pension Co $155,000.00 $206,604.26 133.29% $0.00 E 205-42283-4920 Contract Surplus Refund $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42283-5000 Capital Outlay $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42283-5510 Utility Truck Capital $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42283-5810 SCBA Equip Capital $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 42283 FD Non -Operational Costs $155,000.00 $206,604.26 133.29% $0.00 42285 Navarre Station Fire Ops E 205-42285-2010 Office Supplies $250.00 $427.62 171.05% $0.00 E 205-42285-2080 Training/Instruct Material $400.00 $1,662.16 415.54% $0.00 E 205-42285-2120 Motor Fuels $6,000.00 $949.87 15.83% $0.00 P401 03/03/ Section 28. Page 3 2024 2024 %YTD DECEMBER Account Descr Budget YTD Amt Budget 2024 Amt E 205-42285-2150 Shop Supplies $700.00 $1,097.78 156.83% $0.00 E 205-42285-2160 Chemicals and Chem Pro $750.00 $865.28 115.37% $0.00 E 205-42285-2190 Medical Supplies $1,800.00 $2,134.73 118.60% $321.27 E 205-42285-2210 Equipment Parts $1,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42285-2215 SCBA Equipment Parts $500.00 $423.00 84.60% $0.00 E 205-42285-2400 Small Tools and Minor Eq $4,000.00 $2,227.84 55.70% $377.63 E 205-42285-2410 Fire Department Uniform $5,000.00 $2,693.05 53.86% $1,615.85 E 205-42285-2415 Turn Out Gear $14,000.00 $8,626.29 61.62% $0.00 E 205-42285-3000 Professional Srvs $4,600.00 $562.50 12.23% $0.00 E 205-42285-3050 Physicals / Other Medical $8,000.00 $8,552.25 106.90% $4,965.00 E 205-42285-3225 Truck Communication Se $2,000.00 $2,792.18 139.61% $203.19 E 205-42285-3235 Cty 800mhz Radio Admin $8,000.00 $6,132.35 76.65% $520.66 E 205-42285-3280 Pagers/Radios Repairs & $750.00 $963.35 128.45% $0.00 E 205-42285-3285 Radio Lease $4,100.00 $3,142.29 76.64% $229.36 E 205-42285-3310 Travel / Mileage Reimb $700.00 $430.14 61.45% $0.00 E 205-42285-3350 Education/ Conferences $12,000.00 $4,595.53 38.30% $447.75 E 205-42285-4030 Light Truck Maint & Repa $3,000.00 $523.28 17.44% $0.00 E 205-42285-4035 Heavy Truck Maint & Rep $7,000.00 $8,465.10 120.93% $0.00 E 205-42285-4040 Equip Maint & Repair $2,500.00 $2,664.37 106.57% $580.00 E 205-42285-4600 Recognition Expenditures $500.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 42285 Navarre Station Fire Ops $88,050.00 $59,930.96 68.06% $9,260.71 42286 Navarre Stn Facility Costs E 205-42286-2230 Bldg & Grnds Maint Supp $500.00 $301.25 60.25% $0.00 E 205-42286-3000 Professional Srvs $900.00 $1,125.70 125.08% $62.90 E 205-42286-3275 Internet Access (Mediaco $7,000.00 $4,418.24 63.12% $339.59 E 205-42286-3810 Electricity Expense $4,500.00 $3,629.85 80.66% $705.49 E 205-42286-3820 City Utilities (Wat,Sew,St $2,300.00 $2,265.18 98.49% $372.20 E 205-42286-3830 Natural Gas Expense $3,500.00 $2,248.13 64.23% $539.95 E 205-42286-3840 Custodial & Waste Remo $7,000.00 $6,157.22 87.96% $413.08 E 205-42286-3845 Lawn & Turf Maintenanc $1,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42286-4010 Bldg Maint & Repairs $9,500.00 $12,374.49 130.26% $446.00 42286 Navarre Stn Facility Costs $36,700.00 $32,520.06 88.61% $2,879.21 LONG LAKE, MN Monthly Exp/Rev Accounts -FD 2025 2025 %YTD MARCH Account Descr Budget YTD Amt Budget 2025 Amt I R 205-33402 FD Training Grants $0.00 $3,675.32 0.00% $0.00 R 205-33420 Fire Relief Assoc 2% State Aid $165,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 R 205-34210 Orono Fire Capital Funding $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 R 205-34212 Orono Fire Contract Revenue $577,849.00 $144,462.25 25.00% $0.00 R 205-34213 Long Lake Fire Capital Funding $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 R 205-34214 Long Lake Fire ContractRevenu $103,954.00 $25,988.50 25.00% $0.00 R 205-34215 Medina Fire Capital Funding $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 R 205-34217 Medina Fire ContractRevenue $68,245.00 $17,061.25 25.00% $0.00 R 205-34218 Minnetonka Beach contract rev $63,000.00 $15,750.00 25.00% $0.00 R 205-34220 FD Other Non -Contract Revenu $5,998.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 R 205-34951 Rent - Fire Dept. $5,078.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 R 205-36230 Contributions and Donations $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 R 205-39100 Sales of Land/Capital Assets $0.00 $28,500.00 0.00% $0.00 $989,124.00 $235,437.32 23.80% $0.00 42280 Fire Dept Administration E 205-42280-1000 FT Admin Office Salaries $116,035.94 $14,700.34 12.67% $0.00 E 205-42280-1080 Fire Officer Pay $21,638.00 $1,853.56 8.57% $0.00 E 205-42280-1130 Insurance Opt Out Pay $14,500.00 $1,980.69 13.66% $0.00 E 205-42280-1210 PERA $21,464.06 $2,601.97 12.12% $0.00 E 205-42280-1220 FICA $7,500.00 $384.65 5.13% $0.00 E 205-42280-1310 Employer Paid Health $985.00 $184.20 18.70% $0.00 E 205-42280-1510 Workers Comp Insurance $44,000.00 $29,167.41 66.29% $0.00 E 205-42280-2010 Office Supplies $1,000.00 $371.97 37.20% $0.00 E 205-42280-2030 Printed Forms $500.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42280-2080 Training/Instruct Material $250.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42280-2175 Fire Prevention Materials $1,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42280-2410 Fire Department Uniform $500.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42280-3000 Professional Srvs $4,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42280-3010 Auditing and Actg Servic $7,500.00 $4,000.00 53.33% $0.00 E 205-42280-3090 Software Support $8,500.00 $8,318.69 97.87% $0.00 E 205-42280-3110 W.A.F.T.A $2,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42280-3120 Legal Fees - Civil $2,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42280-3150 LL Admin Fee $18,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42280-3230 Cell Phones $520.00 $66.00 12.69% $0.00 E 205-42280-3310 Travel / Mileage Reimb $400.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42280-3350 Education / Conferences $4,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42280-3355 Motor Vehicle Lic & Reg $100.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42280-3610 General Liability Ins $9,500.00 $10,533.50 110.88% $0.00 E 205-42280-4045 Insurance Claim Expense $250.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42280-4135 Copier Maintenance $650.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42280-4300 Miscellaneous $1,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42280-4330 Dues and Subscriptions $2,750.00 $1,615.78 58.76% $0.00 E 205-42280-4450 Food & Beverage(Mtgs/ $1,500.00 $357.35 23.82% $0.00 E 205-42280-4600 Recognition Expenditures $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42280-5710 Computer/Printer Replac $4,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42280-5800 Other Equipment $4,000.00 $1,350.50 33.76% $0.00 42280 Fire Dept Administration $303,043.00 $77,486.61 25.57% $0.00 42281 Fire Dept Operations E 205-42281-1055 FD Duty Crew Pay $51,600.00 $3,425.00 6.64% $0.00 E 205-42281-1065 Fire Call Pay $78,250.00 $9,607.52 12.28% $0.00 E 205-42281-1075 Fire Fighter Training Pay $63,774.00 $2,877.42 4.51% $0.00 03/03/ Section 2C. Page 1 03/03/ Section 2C. Page 2 2025 2025 %YTD MARCH Account Descr Budget YTD Amt Budget 2025 Amt E 205-42281-1220 FICA $7,500.00 $1,217.13 16.23% $0.00 E 205-42281-2080 Training/Instruct Material $650.00 $46.16 7.10% $0.00 E 205-42281-2120 Motor Fuels $15,300.00 $1,474.21 9.64% $0.00 E 205-42281-2150 Shop Supplies $2,200.00 $54.38 2.47% $0.00 E 205-42281-2160 Chemicals and Chem Pro $1,500.00 $1,630.66 108.71% $0.00 E 205-42281-2190 Medical Supplies $3,800.00 $223.00 5.87% $0.00 E 205-42281-2210 Equipment Parts $3,500.00 $4,580.59 130.87% $0.00 E 205-42281-2215 SCBA Equipment Parts $900.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42281-2400 Small Tools and Minor Eq $6,800.00 $1,360.90 20.01% $0.00 E 205-42281-2410 Fire Department Uniform $10,000.00 $1,430.15 14.30% $0.00 E 205-42281-2415 Turn Out Gear $34,000.00 $22,260.90 65.47% $0.00 E 205-42281-3050 Physicals / Other Medical $16,000.00 $630.00 3.94% $0.00 E 205-42281-3225 Truck Communication Se $5,250.00 $686.26 13.07% $0.00 E 205-42281-3235 Cty 800mhz Radio Admin $20,000.00 $1,384.11 6.92% $0.00 E 205-42281-3280 Pagers/Radios Repairs & $1,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42281-3285 Radio Lease $7,200.00 $458.72 6.37% $0.00 E 205-42281-3310 Travel / Mileage Reimb $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42281-3350 Education/ Conferences $24,000.00 $14,480.00 60.33% $0.00 E 205-42281-4030 Light Truck Maint & Repa $8,000.00 $5,427.13 67.84% $0.00 E 205-42281-4035 Heavy Truck Maint & Rep $19,000.00 $4,916.00 25.87% $0.00 E 205-42281-4040 Equip Maint & Repair $5,500.00 $1,496.45 27.21% $0.00 42281 Fire Dept Operations $387,224.00 $79,666.69 20.57% $0.00 42282 Willow Stn Facility Costs E 205-42282-2230 Bldg & Grnds Maint Supp $1,000.00 $91.14 9.11% $0.00 E 205-42282-3000 Professional Srvs $1,000.00 $125.80 12.58% $0.00 E 205-42282-3275 Internet Access (Mediaco $8,300.00 $890.74 10.73% $0.00 E 205-42282-3810 Electricity Expense $12,500.00 $1,209.07 9.67% $0.00 E 205-42282-3820 City Utilities (Wat,Sew,St $3,100.00 $236.30 7.62% $0.00 E 205-42282-3830 Natural Gas Expense $8,000.00 $1,529.12 19.11% $0.00 E 205-42282-3840 Custodial & Waste Remo $9,000.00 $1,387.29 15.41% $0.00 E 205-42282-3845 Lawn & Turf Maintenanc $2,600.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42282-4010 Bldg Maint & Repairs $16,000.00 $3,162.65 19.77% $0.00 42282 Willow Stn Facility Costs $61,500.00 $8,632.11 14.04% $0.00 42283 FD Non -Operational Costs E 205-42283-1240 State Fire Aid Pension Co $165,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42283-4920 Contract Surplus Refund $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42283-5000 Capital Outlay $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42283-5510 Utility Truck Capital $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42283-5810 SCBA Equip Capital $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 42283 FD Non -Operational Costs $165,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 42286 Navarre Stn Facility Costs E 205-42286-2230 Bldg & Grnds Maint Supp $250.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42286-3000 Professional Srvs $1,000.00 $125.80 12.58% $0.00 E 205-42286-3275 Internet Access (Mediaco $7,000.00 $679.08 9.70% $0.00 E 205-42286-3810 Electricity Expense $4,500.00 $629.65 13.99% $0.00 E 205-42286-3820 City Utilities (Wat,Sew,St $2,300.00 $193.71 8.42% $0.00 E 205-42286-3830 Natural Gas Expense $3,500.00 $1,487.77 42.51% $0.00 E 205-42286-3840 Custodial & Waste Remo $7,000.00 $747.38 10.68% $0.00 E 205-42286-3845 Lawn & Turf Maintenanc $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 E 205-42286-4010 Bldg Maint & Repairs $9,500.00 $2,910.67 30.64% $0.00 42286 Navarre Stn Facility Costs $36,050.00 $6,774.06 18.79% $0.00 EQ4 Section 2D. December Filled Available Percent Week Days 69 176 39.20% Saturday 1 9 1 40 1 22.5% Total 78 216 36.11% Probation 6 52 11.54% Breakdown Probation Slot 6 Remote Work 5 Duty Crew 58 69 18 Monday 14 Tuesday 9 Wednesday 12 Thursday 7 Friday 9 Saturday Number of Calls on Shift Station Call Station 1 Crew Station 2 Crew Call Date In Service On Scene Incident Type Emergency Y/N Description of Event 2 2 0 424 12/2/2024 0:01:42 0:05:56 PI/Rollover Y Rollover W/Injuries Section 2D. January Filled Available Percent Week Days 74 184 40.22% Saturday 1 2 1 32 1 6.3% Total 76 216 35.19% Probation 5 54 9.26% Breakdown Probation Slot 6 Remote Work 11 Duty Crew 59 76 14 Monday 14 Tuesday 14 Wednesday 16 Thursday 16 Friday 2 Saturday Number of Calls on Shift Station Call Station 1 Crew Station 2 Crew Call Date In Service On Scene Incident Type Emergency Y/N Description of Event 1 2 0 19 1/13/2025 0:05:17 0:09:04 Medical Y Medical Assist 1 2 0 21 1/14/2025 0:07:29 0:14:28 M/Aid Y House Fire 1 2 0 23 01/15/2025 0:01:20 0:06:07 Fire Alarm Y Proper Code 1 2 0 24 1/16/2025 0:02:04 0:05:57 Medical Y Alerg/Reaction 1 2 0 38 1/29/2025 0:01:46 0:06:20 Fire Alarm Y False Alarm Avg 0:03:35 0:08:23