Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-26-1990 Council Packetut4C IL ■V a UCT //- P\(p- j';- '■k PUBLIC ATTENDANCE /•CITY OF OBONO L f ( L Mti / /A/V^ MEETING DATE / /y6^/ PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER NAME (pisase prxni:i 1 stL __-'^1 UH\-Bt\kiu. i(LsOP u itJLi ^ ^ a.^SvJ AlOC c.£T ^ K .*»'f 1 /I \ 1 1' ! ' ■7^ ./ -T7.'-ir-Ao.'^ A \/^Jj rlJi ^IZV U,^ . r- ^ ^2/, C^\N /Y.-' ~ vfo t xj yJ .------------ t, /A ^^ ‘*p > S* i C >/ ; ^ T&^. 1 1 \9 •• i H 1 A m lA^ I*! 1 A 1 A l?T —--------------------------------— J AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 1990, 7:00 P.M. (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon request. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. ROLL CALL 1. CONSENT AGENDA* , '• , APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 2. Regular Meeting of November 13, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT ♦♦APPLICANTS** Immediately after the Council has reviewed your application please sign the three (3) original resolutions at the Recorder's desk. Applicants need not execute resolutions for subdivisions, vacations and denials. 3. #1334 Rebers Construction, 2008 Sugarwoods Drive - Request to Encroach Front/Street Setback Area 4. #1497 Toberraan Property, 1960 Shoreline Drive - Conditional Use Permit - Denial Resolution 5. #1532 Fullerton Properties Inc. - Approval of Landscape Plan Plus Entrance Monuments 6. #1591 Orville Fisher, 3300 Fox Street - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution 7. Comprehensive Plan Amendment MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT ENGINEER'S REPORT 8. Pay Request #1, Pumphouse #3 9. Pay Request #7, Well #3 CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 10. Woodhill Country Club 11. Councilmember Selection Process 12. Highway 12 Corridor 13. Strategic Planning 14. Legal Notification 15. Septic Position 16. 1991 Fee Schedule 17. 1991 Budget Public Hearing * 18. Police Officer - Reserve Duty * 19. Administrator's Information Beaver Trapping Accreditation Metro Waste/: aconveyance September Receipts and Disbursements Wire Transfers AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 1990, 7:00 P.M. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT LICENSES (20*) BILLS (21*) UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 11/22 - Holiday - Thanksi,iving Day 11/23 - Holiday 11/26 - Council Meeting 12/03 - Public Hearing 1991 Budget 7:00 P.M. 12/10 - Council Meeting - Last Scheduled Meeting for 1990 12/18 - Reconvened Public Hearing 1991 Budget 7:00 P.M, (If Needed) 12/24 - Christmas Eve Day - Office Closed 12/25 - Holiday - Christmas MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD NOVEMBER 13, 1990 J ATTENDANCE 7:00 P.M. The Council met on the above date with the following members present: Acting Mayor Edward Callahan, Councilmembers Diann Goetten, Alan Nettles, and Barbara Peterson. Mayor Grabek was absent. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Bernhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Public Works Director Gerhardson, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron, Police Chief Kilbo, City Engineer Cook, City Attorney Barrett, and City Recorder Scheffler. AMENDMENT OF YEAR XV STATEMENT OF PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PUBLIC HEARING 7:00 P.M. TO 7:02 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication was duly noted, Bernhardson explained that the City had previously allocated $14,530 for a Highway 12 Study. He said, "Since that time, MNDOT has decided to fund the study and the City will not be asked to assist with funding. The City is recommending that the $14,500 be re-allocated from the Highway 12 Study to the City's rehabilitation program. This would allow the funds to be used within the community." There were no public comments pertaining to this matter and Acting Mayor Callahan closed the Public: Hearing. Goetten asked whether the monies allocated to the Inter-Faith Outreach program would still be received. Gerhardson replied, "Funds were allocated to that program with tha Year XVI Block Grant Funds. Those funds were approved." It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Peterson, to approve the amendment of the Year XV Urban Hennepin County statement of Projected Use of Funds and authorize the Mayor and City Administrator to execute Amendmen’i No. 1 to Contract No. A07289. Motion, Ayes-3, Nays-0. Motion passed. CONSENT AGENDA* Peterson asked to have items 22a and 24 removed from the Consent Agenda. Goetten requested that item 27 be removed from the Consent Agenda. It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Goetten. to approve the Consent Agenda, with the exception of items 22a, 24 and 27, which were removed and discussed in the order appearing on the Agenda. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0. Motion passed. - 1 - ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1990 APPROVAL OF MINUTES* It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Goetten, to approve the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting held October 22, 1930. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0, Motion passed. APPROVAL OF MINUTES* It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Goetten, to approve the minutes of the Canvassing Board Meeting held. November 3, 1990. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-9. .Motion passed. PUBLIC COMMENTS: City Administrator Bernhardson informed Council that Mrs. Ruth Knox was present this evening. He referred to a memo he had prepared regarding the City's policy on survey requirements for building permits. He said, "In this case, the addition to the principal structure appears to be out of the setback areas. However, we have no survey to verify that. Mrs. Knox is asking the City to waive the requirement for a survey. Staff has not askad for a full survey of the entire lot, but rather a verification survey showing only the proposed addition in relation to the setback lines. The City has only amended the survey requirement once, and that was in 1986 for accessory structures meeting certain criteria." Mrs. Knox explained that she was unaware of the need for a survey. She said, "My contractor v;as taking care of everything and did not realize that a survey was required when he applied for the permit. I am hoping to have the footings installed before the frost gets too deep. I live on two acres and have brought my nearest neighbor with me this evening. She has no objections to what I am proposing. The existing porch is being enlarged toward the back yard." Acting Mayor Callahan suggested that Mrs. Knox could be allowed to proceed with the footing installation while a survey is being prepared. He said, "However, if the survey indicates that the footings do not meet the required setbacks, your contractor will have to relocate them." Mrs. Knox stated that she would agree to such an arrangement. Goetten stated that she agreed with Acting Mayor Callahan's suggestion. Peterson asked whether it would be necessary to establish a specific date by which a survey must be submitted. Mrs. Knox said, "It is my intention to have the entire lot surveyed. That will take some time. I would appreciate it if I could submit the survey in the spring. If anything is placed incorrectly, I will move it." - 2 - ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1990 Callahan suggested to Mrs. Knox tha:: she inform her surveyor that the survey must include the distances from the addition to the lot lines. Mabusth stated that it may be appropriate to have Mrs. Knox submit a letter stating that she agrees to meet whatever deadline is determined and to relocate the structure if necessary. Nettles stated that he would favor Acting Mayor Callahan's proposal, provided that only the footings are constructed at this time. He said, "I do not believe it is a good idea to build beyond the footings without having a survey." Mrs. Knox stated that it would be more economical to delay the survey until the spring when she can have the entire lot surveyed. She said, "It would cost more to have part of the lot surveyed now and then survey the whole lot in the spring." Acting Mayor Callahan advised Mrs. Knox that the surveyor would not survey the same area twice, but would add to what he had already done. He suggested that Mrs. Knox should contact a surveyor and inquire about the cost of having part of the property surveyed now and the rest in the spring. It was m^ved by Goetten, seconded by Nettles, that Mrs. Knox submit a letter indicating that she will obtain a verification survey and agree to relocate the footings if they do not meet the setback requirements. Further, that she be allowed to have the footings poured for her porch addition now while the verification survey is being prepared. No additional structure can be constructed until the verification survey is received by the City. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0. Motion passed. Ms. Peg Swanson, 1661 Bollum Lane, Long Lake, stated that she was an Orono resident from 1983 to August of 1990. She said, "I am here to make a statement regarding some comments that were made at the October 22, 1990, Council meeting. I will read the statement so that I am sure it is correct. I am here on behalf of Landmark Construction. My husband, Paul Swanson, is the owner of that company. He has reviewed this and has authorized me to read this statement. Landmark built Mayor Grabek's nev/ home in 1988. There was a lawsuit filed against the City regarding this project. I think most of you are aware of that at this time. I am not here to discuss the merits of that lawsuit, as was discussed at the last meeting. But instead, I would like to clarify some questions that were raised by a Dr. Robert Gehrman at the last meeting. Botn Paul and I have listened to the tape recording of that meeting and we have seen accounts published in the 'Wayzata News* and the 'Sailor' newspapers. I am simply here to try to add to, and possibly correct, some of that information because it was a concern to us. - 3 - ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1990 Dr. Gehrman first asked the entire Council if the Mayor or City Administration had informed the Council about the lawsuit filed against the City involving the Mayor's new home. According to the tape recording, only Mr. Grabek and Mr. Nettles knew about the lawsuit. It is our opinion, my husband's and myself, that all litigation involving the City should be immediately communicated to all elected officials. I would think the elected officials have a right and obligation to be informed on behalf of the citizens that thay represent, as well as for their ov/n benefit. We cannot even begin to imagine what possible explanation there is for withholding or not disclosing this information to the entire Council. Question number two Dr. Gehrman went on to ask was was there an outside consultant hired in the building of Mayor Grabek's new home, regarding inspections. In revie\/ing the tape recording, v/e also heard that Mayor Grabek and Mark Bernhardson emphatically answered no, that there was no outside consultant hired in inspecting the Mayor's new home. I have with me copies of a bill, if you v/ould like to look at them. I have one for each of you. (Ms. ....anson distributed a copy to each Councilmember) This bill v/as presented to the City by an outside inspector, his name was Loren Kohnen. He was sent to inspect the Mayor's property. As you can see, he was out there ten times, according to the bill. There was another inspector that was out there, Glenn Cook, from McCombs, Knutsen, v/ho was also hired and paid for by the City. We actually were sent a copy of that bill and refused to pay. Vie sent if back to the City and just assumed that it was paid by the City. Neither one of us can understand why these bills were not disclosed at the last meeting. I guess the Council will have to decide if this warrants further consideration. I thank you for the time to help clarify this issue." Bernhardson replied, "The question, if I recall correctly, that Or. Gehrman asked was if an engineering consultant had been hired in conjunction with the lawsuit. I tried to get further clarification from Dr. Gehrman on that. The bill that you see in front of you is a bill from Loren Kohnen, who is Metro West Builders. He is not an engineering consultant. That bill was for an inspection done in August of 1988. As I mentioned to you in the Administrator's Information, we had shown you a copy of the Notice of Claim, excuse me, not the Notice of Claim, but that in fact there was an issue on this property in November of 1988. The lawsuit was not filed until August of 1989 by Landmark Construction. So, as to an engineering consultant hired in conjunction with the lawsuit, there was none. There is a building inspector who fills in for us when our inspectors are not available. It happened that at the time the septic system repair work v^as being done, that Michael Gaffron, our Septic Inspector, was on vacation. Wa had engaged Loren Kohnen to do that. I hope that clarifies it." - 4 - ■y- ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1990 Goetten asked Bernhardson to comment on his opinion regarding lawsuits and the notification of Council. Bernharc^.:a replied, “As far as lawsuits are concerned, if the Council wishes to be notified of those, Staff would be happy to notify you either individually or collectively." Peterson asked whether ten inspections is normal for a septic system. Mabusth replied, “After the problems that we had with this septic system, we wanted Loren to work very closely with the on­ site septic tester. I think Michael conveyed some specific directions to Loren before he went on vacation. Michael may wish to expand on that. I can tell you that it v;as necessary to have seven to eight site inspections done when I had a septic system installed. There were three inspectors at some of those inspections. In the case of the Mayor’s home, the septic system was installed incorrectly. It was necessary to do additional septic testing for expansion on another end of the septic system.“ Gaffron added, “The normal situation with a mound system would be that we would be inspecting before work begins, and another inspection would be done when they rough up, when the sand and rock has been added and the pressure pipe is installed. Another inspection would be d-:)ne when the grading work is complete. When Loren noted that he made ten half hour inspections, I suspect that he was out there probably more than half an hour for any number of those inspections. We wanted him to be out there as much as possible, to oversee the work of this contractor who had done the work incorrectly first. We wanted to make sure it was done right the second time.” Nettles said, ”I have trouble with the idea that because someone happens to be a public official, that any lawsuit that is brought against them, should automatically be made public business. A lawsuit is a very personal thing. Lawyers are trained to maintain the confidences of their clients. Before the City agrees to disclose such information to the Council, I think that should be considered. This case provides a good example. That same night that Mr. Gehrman was here, it happened that one of the lawyers from the firm that originally brought the suit on Landmark Constru«-uion * s behalf was here.” Ms. Swanson indicated that the lav/yer was not their attorney. Nettles continued; "The atioiiiey stated that his firm did not respond to a Summary Judgment Motivon and let the thing t*: dismissed because we determined it was not a good lawsuit to pursue. Therefore, the City would have been debating, or causing - 5 - ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1990 a public disclosure for someone on a lawsuit that was ultimately determined by the person that brought it to be without merit. The other thing I have to say, just so everyone is clear, this wasn't something that Jim Grabek brought to my attention, personally or outside the Council. I had tried a similar case involving the City of Apple Valley. In these cases, when there is a suit against the City, they automatically turn it over to the insurance agency, who turns it over to GAB. or the adjusters that represent the municipalities. They hire their own lawyers, do their own investigation. It is more a contractual matter that circumvents the need for the Council to become involved until there is investigation. In this case, as I understand it, the case against the City was dismissed without anything further.” Goetten stated that it may not be necessary to discuss a particular lawsuit at a public meeting, but that Council should be informed of pending lawsuits. She said, "I would like to be apprised of such matters." Acting Mayor Callahan said, "I agree. I believe the Council should be notified, even though there may be no action taken. I also believe that we were entitled to know what the bills are. In this case, the bill w.as for v/ork done in the absence of Michael Gaffron. There may be other such bills for work done at other homes during this same period of time.” Peterson asked for clarification as to whether or not Mr. MacKinnon. (the Attorney who spoke at the October 22, 1990 meeting) had in fact represented Landmark Construction. Ms. Swanson stated that represented them. MacKinnon had only initially Mr. John Farnham, stated that he had a letter to present to the Council v/hich contained a number of concerns and questions from the citizens regarding tne City facilities. Ha distributed the letters to each CounciImenber and the public. Ms. Cherokee Use Tomirunded the Council candidates for running "a clean and above-board candidacy". She said, "I think we should all be proud of O.ronc that we did not succumb to things that were happening on the State level. I appreciate the persons who are currently on the Council and congratulate those who did win." PLAHMIIIG COMMISSION COMMENTS: Pla-' • vj Commission Representative Cohen was not present. L - 6 - ORCNO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1990 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: #1470 KNAPP/PARTEN 4300 BAYSIDE ROAD PRELIMINARY PLAT Mr. Knapp was present, Bernhardson reviewed the specific Planning Commission recommendations and explained that this preliminary subdivision proposal does meet the PRD criteria. He said, "The Planning Commission did approve the PRD approach to subdividing this parcel. It will be necessary for Mr. Knapp to file a Conditional Use Permit application to be reviewed by the Planning Commission at their January meeting." Gaffron said, "I believe that the applicant is requesting conceptual approval of this plan so that he can submit a Conditional Use Permit application." Goetten noted that the Planning Commission had previously considered the provision of future connecting roads from this parcel. She questioned why that was no longer a consideration. Gaffron replied, "The Planning Commission reviev/ed tv/o or three possibilities. The first was to provide an access for the two houses just south of the Luce Line. Both of those property owners adamantly opposed such a plan, stating that their easement from the DNR to cross the Luce Line was sufficient. The Planning Commission felt that the City does not have an obligation to provide an alternate access. However, should it be necessary in the future, there is an outlet that could be used. The second consideration is whether or not there should be a continuation acro.ss the Luce Line to Watertov/n Road. Again, the Planning Commission believed that there was no obvious need for that at this time. The third consideration involved the inclusion of Mr. White's property to the south and a continuation of a road to Bayside. That opportunity is still there, should Mr. VJhite decide to further develop his property." It was moved by Nettles, seconded by Goetten, to give conceptual approval of the PRD concept plan as recommended by the Planning Commission, and direct Mr. Knapp to make the appropriate PRD Conditional Use Permit application. Motion. Ayes-1, Nays-0. Motion passed. #1497 TOBERNAN PROPERTY 1960 SHORELINE DRIVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DENIAL RESOLUTION It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by Peterson, to table this matter until the November 26, 1990 Council meeting. Motion. Ayes-1, Nays-0. Motion passed. - 7 - ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1990 #1555 LANDSTAR, INC. 2501 OLD BEACH ROAD PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION RESOLOTIOM #2900 Mr. Dennis Sandin was present. Mr. Norman Paurus, 2500 Casco Point Road, asked about the one lot in this subdivision that will be zoned for commercial use. Bernhardson replied, "That lot is in a commercial zone. The intent is to give that lot to the Freshwater Foundation." Peterson asked whether there is any guarantee that the Freshwater Foundation will take over this parcel. Mr. Sandin replied, "I have a letter of Foundation." intent from the Mabusth stated that Mr. Blanch, the property owner, is giving this property to the Freshwater Foundation. Peterson asked for a cost estimate for the bituminous overlay. Cook replied, "It will cost approximately $25,000 for the two inch overlay and $20,000 for the one and a half overlay." Acting Mayor Callahan asked what advantages exist for the one and a half inch verlay versus the two inch. Cook replied, "The only advantage over the two inch is that you get more structural strength on the road. There has been no testing to determine to what degree that occurs. The value at this point in time is somewhat arbitrary." Goetten asked Gerhardson for his opinion. Gerhardson stated that a one and a half inc*^ overlay would be sufficient. He said, "There is existing blacktop " Mr. Sandin stated that he would accept the Public Works Director's recommendation for an inch and a half overlay. Peterson asked whether the City of Minnetonka Beach has agreed to an inch and a half. Gerhardson replied, "I believe that they do not intend to do anything at this point." Mabusth said, "I think they are going to ask for the overlay. That is what JoEllen Hurr indicated the last time. She - 8 - ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1990 ZONING FILE #1555-LANDSTAR CONTINUED did not specify whether it would be one and naif or two inches." Bernhardson stated that the request for two inches overlay was subsequent to the statements made by Ms. Hurr. Acting Mayor Callahan asksd the Council for their opinion regarding the financial responsibility for the road. Goetten asked Gerhardson if in fact Old Beach Road was on the Public Works schedule for bituminous work. Gerhardson replied, "Yes. we were going to do the project this fall. However, we decided to delay the project until this issue was resolved." Peterson said, "If it was the Citv's intent to put an overlay on this road, then I believe we should charge the developer 25%." Goetten asked whether this situation has ever occurred in the past. Gerhardson stated that it has not. Goetten stated that charging 25% would be fair. Peterson asked why Staff is recommending 50% Cook replied, "In my opinion, this is a nav/ development. The developer has not contributed to this road in any v/ay in the past. I believe the developer has some obligation to contribute to the road. In other subdivisions, the developer is asked to pay for the entire road." It was moved by Nettles, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2900, granting the Preliminary Subdivision for E. V?. Blanch, (Landstar, Inc.), with the requirei ::t that Old Beach Road have a one and a half inch overlay and that the developer pay half of Lhe cost of that project. Motion. Ayes-3, Acting Mayor Callahan. Nay. Motion passed. #1579 GARRY AND MARIE EVERSON 4755 NORTH SHORE DRIVE VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2898 Bernhardson provided a brief summary of the Everson's revised proposal, noting that the Planning Commission had recommended approval. Mrs. Everson stated that she objected to the additional $175.00 fee which she was being asked to pay as a penalty. She - 9 - P■■W' ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1990 ZONING FILE «1S79-EVERS0N CONTINUED said, "Ths plan we have presented is totally agreeable to us. However, we were not asked to pay the additional $175.00 at the time we applied for the variance. I do not feel we should have to pay it now." Actinn Mayor Callahan asked Mrs. Everson if she understood that they *u-re being asked to pay an additional $175.00 because of the after-the-fact nature of this application. Mrs. Everson replied, "We understand that now. However, we did not intend to build a deck without letting the City know. paid $175.00 for the application and paid for a survey. It will cost us money to remove a portion of the deck and to buy sod. I believe we have done everything we were asked to do." Goetten asked whether Staff has a program in place to inspect properties to assure that conditions that are specified in resolutions are in fact carried out. Gaffron replied, "This application has been placed in a tickler file. Staff has been making a more concerted effort to follow up on these situations. VJe have begun to include language j r*, the resolutions requiring the conditional work to be done p. iOr to a footing inspection being made. That v/orks well for applications that are not after-the-fact." Goetten stated that she was pleased to see that the City has A program in place. Acting Mayor Callahan suggested that at some time in the near future. the issue of plastic and hardcover shou’.d be reviewed. It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2898, granting after-ths-fact hardcover and average setback variances for the construction of a deck at 4755 North Shore Drive. Motion, Ayes-3, Nettles. Nay. Motion passed. Nettles did not agree with the requirement to pay an additional $175.00. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT: Acting Mayor Callahan suggested that the process for appointing an additional Councilmember begin as soon as possible. He said, "I realize that we cannot appoint anyone until the first of the year, but we can notify the public of the vacancy and begin taking applications." Goetten and Peterson, concurred with Callahan. It was the consensus of Council that Staff place a notification of the Council seat vacancy in the City newspaper a;? - 10 - 1. R. ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1990 MAYOR/COONCIL REPORT CONTINUED soon as possible. Tne deadline for accepting applications and resumes i?3 December 3’ . 1990. Goetten statec' .bat she had received a call from an Orono resident inquiring about the upcoming County Board Meeting. She said, "Her concern is whether the City of Orono will have a representative at that meeting to express concern on behalf of the residents about the proposed levy. I know that last year the City sent a letter expressing concern about the social programs that were going to be cut, I think we need to send a letter to the County expressing our concerns." Bernhardson stated that he had tried to contact thu Hennepin County Budget Director, but had not been success''ul. He said, "In order to reduce the proposed levy it would be necessary to find $3,000,000 for every percent it is decreased. I wanted to find out how much of this proposed increase was due to shifts from the federal and state to the local level. I estimate that the County budget has increased approximately 11%, The newspaper cited welfare and correction services as the primary reason. I believe it may be most beneficial to send a letter to our County Commissioner." Goetten stated that one of her concerns is the p-*r diem monies that the County Commissioners collect for attending meetings. She said, "I believe that these meetings are part of their job and that the extra salary should be eliminated. It is also ray understanding that the Commissioners are asking for a fairly large increase in their salaries." Bernhardson stated that ha would pcovide Goetten v;ith information pertaining to the proposed increase in the County Commissioner's salary. He also stated that he would send a letter to the County Commissioner asking them to reconsider the tax increase. Goetten stated that she would like to receive a copy of the County budget in the future so she could reviev/ it. CITY ENGINEER*S REPORT: NAVARRE HEIGHTS DRAINAGE Bernhardson explained that this item had been tabled at the October 22, 1990 meeting to provide Staff an opportunity to see how this proposal would impact the residents on Togo Road. He said, "Glenn Cook and John Gerhardson have looked at the area. It appears that drainage from Navarre flov/s to the v/etlands on the south side of the railroad tracks. It then flows through a culvert and into a ponding area. There is a tile area, but it is ineffective." - 11 - ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1990 ■AVARRE HEIGHTS DRAINAGE CONTINUED Cook showed a drawing of the drainage pattern and ponding areas. He said, ''Ponding area two is a concern because of Lot 34. There was a drainage ditch between the house and trees, but that has been filled in. There is a driveway there now. There has also been some filling on the church property. All of the drainage overflow potential has been eliminated. The draintile that comes in from the nort*- side of Togo Road is approximately 1^ feet below the wetlands. The outlet to the draintile is actually lower than the marsh. That was probably not the case when the draintile was installed. There is also an open ditch in this area that needs to be cleaned out. It is full of dead trees, leaves and debris. The storm sewer pipe from Livingston Avenue is going to change the flow to the Togo Road area by approximately 20% in a five year storm. At this time 80% of the water from a five year storm goes down to that area over land. What needs to be done here is that a form of overflow drainage route should be created again- The ditch should be cleaned out. That should occur whether or not the Livingston storm sev;er project is done. This is an entirely separate issue." Bernhardson said, "The question is whether or not we expand the Livingston drainage project to include Togo Road or handle each project separately. If we expand the Livingston project, it would be necessary to hold anoth'* * Public Hearing. If we proceed with the projects separately we could hold a Project Hearing for the Livingston drainage project at the next meeting. Staff could then provide information to Council as to the options available for addressing the Togo Road problem. There is also the option of providing a temporary solution to the Cuff's problem." Gerhardson explained that it would be possible to cut a swale on the Cuff's property to alleviate water ponding on the road. He said, "This could be done very quickly with minimal expense. This would provide a solution while the City decides whether or not to proceed with a storm sewer project in the spring." Acting Mayor Callahan stated that the Livingston drainage matter was tabled at the last meeting due to the introduction of the Togo Road problem. He said, "However, prior to the October 22nd Council meeting. Council voted to have the plans and specifications drawn. Where do we go from here?" Bernhardson replied, "At the next meeting we v/ould hold a formal project hearing. If Council determines that they wish to proceed beyond that step, the City would obtain bids for the project. Once bids are received, a Public Assessment Hearing would be held. Once the final financial information is known, the assessment would be ordered. The City would allow the 33-day appeal period to lapse before deciding to order the project." - 12 - 5'- L. ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1990 NAVARRE HEIGHTS DRAINAGE CONTINUED Ms. Pirn Peters, 3(340 Togo Road, stated that the residents on Togo Road do not need an additional 20% of water draining onto their properties. Mr. Carlson is already under water. I would like to compliment the City for their prompt attention to this issue. ’• Ms. Shirley Spalding, 3508 Livingston Avenue, stated that this matter was tabled because she and Beth Eisher had provided another petition from persons opposed to the Livingston drainage project. Mr. Harvey Reder, 35S8 Livingston Avenue, stated that the Cuffs could install a drainage swale without the City's assistance. Acting Mayor Callahan reminded Mr. Reder that the Public Works Director had indicated that such a swale v/ould only be a temporary solution. Ms. Karen Cuff, 3572 Livingston Avenue, stated that the City does not have easement rights for drainage on her property. Si said, "John Gerhardson has talked to mo about providing temporary drainage easement. I agreed to that. We do need something in place to handle the spring melt." Acting Mayor Callahan asked if cleaning out the existina ditch and creating a new ditch in the Togo Road area woul.. adequately handle the extra runoff that would come from the new swale on the Cuff's property. Cook replied, "That is correct." Goetten stated that the City cannot increase the drainage flow to other properties. She said, "Because of that, it may be necessary to tie these two projects together." Acting Mayor Callahan agreed that if one project is done, the other must be done as well. He asked vmether the City could just go in and dig a ditch from pond one to the wetland. Cook replied, "It would be necessary to obtain easements." Mr. Hersel Forester, 3599 Crystal Place, asked why the City was intent on putting in a storm sewer project that 50% of the residents did not want. He said, "The project will only benefit one or two persons." Acting Mayor Callahan stated that it was only in the last month or so that the City was made aware of the opposition to this project. He said, "The Council has not yet determined whether or not the project should be ordered." - 13 - ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1990 NAVARRE HEIGHTS DRAINAGE CONTINUED It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by Peterson, that City Staff proceed to contact the Phase II Togo Road) project property owners regarding drainage easement provisions so that a drainage ditch can be recreated and the existing ditch can be cleaned. Motion, Ayes-!-, Nays-0. ‘lotion passed. VJith regard to the Livingston drainage issue, Peterson stated that Ms. Cuff did do as the City asked. Sne said, "In my opinion, the City should proceed to ha/e the pla.is and specifications prepared. i do not believe that the temporary swale is adequate." Goetten concurred with Peterson. Mrs. Spalding asked if there v/ould be another Public Hearing after the plans and specifications were prepared. Acting Mayor Callahan advised her that there would be additional Public Hearings. It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Nettles, to establish December 10, 1990, as the date for the Publit Hearing on the Navarre Heights storm water project and that the plans and specifications prepared for presentation at that Public* Hearing. Motion, Ayes-1, Nays-0. Motion passed. It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by Peterson, to direct City Staff to install a temporary sv;ele on the Cuff property for an amount not to exceed $500.00. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0. Motion passed. Nettles asked Staff to provide information to clarify which of the neighbors are for or against the storm water project. Ms. Cuff noted that because this process is taking so long that she now has structural damage to her house. WOODHILL SEWER CONNECTION Bernhardson summarized the information presented in his November 9, 1990 memo. He said. "It will probably not be necessary to do a Comprehensive Plan Ainendment in this case. However, once the sewer line is installed, the City may receive additional requests for hook up. The principle properties that may be interested would be other Country Club facilities and the houses to the east and west that are currently in a rural zone. If the City were to get guarantees that no one else could hook up without a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, that would offer some protection. If Council decides not to accept this request, Hoodhill would have to rely on a septic related solution." Goetten asked, "V^ith all of the property that is owned by the Country Club, what precludes them from expanding their septic - 14 - ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1990 WOODHILL SEWER CONNECTION CONTINUED system?” Mark Gronberg, Surveyor/I^ngineer, replied, "v;e had advised the Country Club to use a meter to monitor usage. In peak flowage. they have 11,000 gallons per day. Tnat would require the equivalent of nine or ten mound systems. You cannot locate mound systems in one place because they generate too much water. Because the topography is rolling and difficult to work with, it would be difficult to locate nine or ten mound systems. It would also be a nightmare to have nine or ten pumping systems working throughout various areas of the golf course." Goetten stated that when sewer improvements were installed in that area, that there were persons who asked to be excluded from the project. She said, "Those persons were not included in the project and were informed that they would not be allo\;ed to hook up in the future Are we now going to reverse that policy?" Bernhardson replied, "I cannot guarantee that such a precedent would not be set and that it will become necessary to plan differently for sewer capacities in the future. However, we should be able to base our decision to allow hook up or not on the capacity available v/ith an existing system. Council would have to consider a method for charging such property owners who wish to hook up after-the-fact. Another issue is that the City does currently have certain properties that are hooked up to a sewer system of a neighboring city." Goetten questioned whether it is good policy to deny Orono residents who have subsequently asked to hook into a sewer line, but permit the Country Club to do just that. She suggested that the policy itself may need further review. Acting Mayor Callahan stated that he cou d not see any reason why the City would deny residents the option to hook up. He agreed with Goetten that the policy would need further review. Nettles asked how the City would address the issue of the assessment cost. He said, "The Country Club is a large property and I would imagine there would be a significant change in the per unit cost for the original project. Would the City then go back and reconsider what each property should have paid and credit the assessment?" Bernhardson consideration ." replied, "That would option Peterson asked if any of the neighboring properties have been informed of this proposal. Bernhardson stated that the neighbors have not been informed - 15 - ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1990WOODHILL SEWER CONNECTION CONTINUED of this. Mr. Curt Quady asked if there was any truth to a rumor that the Woodhill Country Club pulled out of Orono because they could not obtain a liquor license. Bernhardson replied, "This portion of the Club House has been locatad in V7ayzata since the early 19.20's. The Clue House may have become a part of VJayzata back in the days prior to Ovono becoming a Village, when it could not issue liquor licenses." Mr. Quady said, "They left Orono because they could get a liquor license. Now they are asking to hook up to Orono sewer. It seems to me that a situation similar to v/hat is happening with the City of Long Lake may occur." Acting Mayor Callahan said, "I believe that if the City of Orono has an opportunity to do something positive for a neighboring City, we should do what we can to maintain a good relationship. As the City Administrator stated earlier, the City of Orono is currently making use of various utilities from neighboring cities for the benefit of our citizens. The situation v/ith Long La^* . became a problem because they came to own the land. That is not an issue in this case." Goetten asked if the "t\ussell Avenue'VFox station has the capacity to handle this addition. Srreet lift Cook replied, "Staff would hove to look at that. If there is any kind of approval, it would have to include a requirement that the Country Club would be responsible for any upgrades that are necessary. The lift station has a finite capacity and we need to determine what that is." Bernhardson asked Council wiiat other issues they would like Staff to address. Acting Mayor Callahan stated that he wcuits Staff to verify tha^ the Vfloodhill Country Club is in fact within the M.U.S.A. line. He said, "I would not consider amending the Comprehensive Plan to accommodate this request." Goetten stated that she would like Staff to review the issue of precedent and how similar situations have been handled with neighboring cities in the past. It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by Peterson, to table this matter until NovemV>er 26, 1990, to allow Staff the opportunity to address the concerns raised by Council this evening. Motion, Ayes-4. Nays-0. Motion passed. - 16 - ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1990PAY REQUEST #2-HIGH\/AY 12 SEWER ft VJATER RESTORATION It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by Peterson, to approve Pay Request -^2 to Otten Brothers in the amount of $16,359.00 for work completed to date for the Highway 12 Sewer and Water Project. Motion, Ayes-4. Nays-0. Motion passed. PAY REQUEST #1-LIFT STATION 8 RENOVATION* It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Goetten, to approve Pay Request #1 to Northwest Mechanical, in the amount of $9,044.00 for work done in the renovation of Lift Station -^8. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0. Motion passed. CHANGE ORDER #1-LIFT STATION 8 RENOVATION* It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Goetten. to change the completion date for Lift Station #8 renovation from October 31, 1990 to November 21, 1990. Motion, Ayes-1, Nays-0. Motion passed. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT: STREET LIGHT REQUEST - LIVINGSTON/LYRIC AVENUE Bernhardson provided a brief review of this issue. He said, "I had originally understood Mr. Belch’s request to be that the City help him provide a method of paying for the lights. That is incorrect. The neighborhood is asking that the City pay for the lights. The issue then is v/hether the City is willing to take financial responsibility for those lights. Another option would be for the City to determine a method for billing the property owners for these and other private street lights. Because this issue has been delayed somewhat, it may be appropriate for the City to pay for the lights for one quarter so that the lights can be turned on.” Goetten stated that she agrees that the lights are needed. She asked what the City has done in past situations. Bernhardson replied, "The City at one time had agreed to act as an intermediary. We would pay the utility company and assess the property owner for the cost. This process v/ould only require a Public Hearing prior to the first assessment. There is now new legislation that requires the City to have a Public Hearing every year. That created additional work and cost for the City and we stopped. As far as I know, we have not had a request such as this for the last five years. There are presently 104 private lights that are not being funded through the City." Peterson asked if this request was different than the Derry request. Gerhardson replied- "Yes, this is different." Mr. Norra Paurus, 2500 Casco Point Road, stated that this hasOR - 17 - mm ,r ONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1990 STREET LIGHT REQUEST CONTINUED been an ongoing issue since the days that he served on the City Council. He suggested that the City take the time to establish a policy so there will be no questions regarding this issue. Peterson noted that Mr. Wilbur Anderson's neighbors had been concerned about street lights. Mr. Anderson replied, "My neighbors petitioned four times I believe, but they did not receive any answers." Acting Mayor Callahan stated that the City could be setting a precedent if it agreed to pay for these lights. He added, "The City at this point does not have anything in place to tell people why the City will or will not pay for their lights." Bernhardson suggested that the City could establish a method for billing the residents for existing private street lights. He said, "That would help to alleviate any questions about paying for the lights. We could also bill residents for the installation of new lights and then continue to bill on a regular basis." Mr. Paurus stated that there should be some cost sharing of the street lights because the City does have an obligation to keep areas safe. It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to table this matter to allow Staff to review the aspects of billing the residents for street lights and paying for the street lights. In the meantime, the lights in the Schlee twinhome development are to be turned on for one quarter. Motion, Ayes-1, Nays-0. Motion passed. FACILITIES WORKSHOP Acting Mayor Callahan stated that in his opinion the workshop should be delayed until January when the new Council is sworn in and the additional Councilmember is appointed. He suggested that a date and time for the workshop be established at the first Council meeting in January. It was the consensus of Council to delay any further action on this item until the first Council meeting in January. - 18 - ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1990 i; HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR Bernhardson reported that the City has now received the maps showing the five routing options for Highway 12. He said, ’’The City has received maps showing where existing cemeteries and parks are located. Councilmember Goetten has indicated that there are also wetland maps. MNDOT wants us to respond to each of the five options presented in relation to existing obstructions that may pose a problem. They are not asking us to form any opinions as to which corridor is more preferable at this point. I believe it would be beneficial to hold a joint meeting of all of the committees, staff, and Council to discuss v;here the City should go from this point." Goetten said, "I attended a Technical Committee meeting this afternoon. I was told that MNDOT wants information regarding the location of woodlands and agriculture preserves. I talked with Steve Hay and Larry Dahlman and either of them would be willing to come and be involved in our discussions. They had indicated that if we could provide the information at the beginning of December, the overlays would be ready by the end of December. MNDOT is hoping to do an updated forecast on existing Highway 12 and its effect on existing roads. They are also asking the County for information regarding projects they may have that may be involved in this. My preference is that we hold the joint meeting on a Saturday as soon as possible. I would suggest the first of December." Acting Mayor Callahan stated that he had attended the Citizen's Committee meeting. He said, "The forecasts to which Councilmember Goetten referred have to do with traffic patterns as of the year 2ul0. It was mentioned that such information would not be available by the time the Citizens Committee holds their next meeting in the middle of December. In that event, that meeting would be delayed. I agree that we need to hold a meeting, however we are not under any immediate pressure to do so. When we do hold the meeting, I believe that we should start formulating a corridor preference. It would also be beneficial to meet with the various individual citizen's groups that have been established throughout the community." It was the consensus of the Council that there should be a joint meeting of the Council, various Committees, and public at 9:00 a.m. Saturday, December 1, 1990 at the School. COMMERCIAL TELECOMMUNICATION REVIEW PLAN Goetten stated that she would like to know what surrounding communities are doing *^0 address this issue. Council accepted the information presented and took no formal action. - 19 - ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER L3, 1990 FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN Bernhardson stated that the Ci *r:y has reviewed, revised and approved the plan. He sax. e would provide an informational meeting for the employees in November and ask them to apply for this benefit during the ixrst week in December. We are also presenting information regarding the health plan premium this evening so that can be taken into consideration in conjunction with the flexible benefits program." Goetten stated that she is pleased become available to the City employees. to see this program It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Attachments A and B as its plan for Section 125 program. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0. Motion passed. 1991 HEALTH INSURANCE It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by Peterson, to adopt a contribution rate of $231.00 per month for family health coverage for general employees for 1991. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-O. Motion passed. 1990 AUDITOR APPOINTMENT It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Peterson, to appoint the audit firm of Pannell Kerr Forster to perform the required audits for the 1990 fiscal year at an estimated cost of $15,450, plus direct expenses. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0. Motion passed. ANIMAL CARE FACILITY Bernhardson stated that Corcoran no longer wishes to provide its services to any of the area communities. He said, "We are recommending Reo Raj, located in Watertown, as an alternative." Peterson noted that the letter from Carol that kennel area at Reo Raj is unlocked. Hansing stated Chief Kilbo replied that the facility has an attendant 24 hours a day and in that sense is unlocked. He said, "The City had a key to access the Corcoran facility when it was unattended." Peterson asked if there is any liability on the City's behalf should a dog be taken from the facility. She said, "I know that dogs have been taken out of there by their owners." Bernhardson stated that Staff would approach the personnel at Reo Raj and discuss a possible need for more security. Peterson asked if five days is an appropriate length ~ime to hold the animals. Chief Kilbo explained that there have been situationr - 20 - .:he m ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1990ANIMAL CARE FACILITY CONTINUED past where owners have taken a long time to pick up their dog. Bernhardson stated that the City's standard is five days. Kilbo said, "At this time, if we pick up a stray, it costs the City $3.00 for the fee, $40.00 for the five days it remains at the facility and $10.00 for euthanasia. If the animal is held beyond five days, the City incurs more liability." Bernhardson stated that he would look further into the aspect of the length of time animals may be held. Kilbo noted that not all animals picked up by the Animal Control Officer belong to Orono citizens. He suggested that Council may wish to consider increasing the impound fee if the length of stay is increased. It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by Peterson, to direct Staff to contract with Reo Raj for animal impound services for 1991 and approve the 2% rate increase for the animal control contract for 1991, subject to an investigation of the liability, security questions, and impound fees. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0, Motion passed. AMENDMENT OF YEAR XV C.D.B.G. FUNDS* It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2899, c^mending the Year XV Urban Hennepin County statement of Projected Use of Funds and authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to execute Amendment #1 to Contract No. A07289. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0. Motion passed. CHRISTMAS EVE DAY 1990 Peterson stated that the City should give the employees an extra holiday this year. She said, "If there is one person that wishes to come in an work, is it fair that he/she must take a vacation day or floating holiday to do so?" Bernhardson ren "Staff did talk to everyone at City Hall and no one objected to this proposal. The Public Works Department would follow what the majority wished to do. If we were to give the employees an additional holiday, it might also be necessary to give the working Police Officers an additional day off." Goetten asked what would happen in the event of a snow storm on Christmas Eve. She questioned whether it would be necessary to pay the Public Works personnel holiday pay for working. Gerhardson replied, "That is correct." Nettles indicated that he concurred with Peterson, but - 21 - ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1990 CHRISTMAS EVE DAY CONTINUED understands Staff's reasoning. It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by Gcetten, to direct staff to close City Hall on Monday, December 24th and allow the option of using either vacation or 1991 floating holiday to be used for that day and acknowledge that staff will maintain at least a minimum staffing level for ‘onday, December 31, 1990, with Public Works department head determining whether it is a scheduled work day. If not a scheduled work day, department personnel would use either vacation or a floating holiday in the same manner as Cxty Hall personnel. Motion, Ayes-3, Peterson, Nay. Motion passed. LMCD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN/SHORELAND REGULATIONS Acting Mayor Callahan asked to comment on this item, even though it had not been removed from the Consent Agenda. He stated that after the first of the year, it would wise for the City of Orono to meet with the other lakeshore communities to prepare for oncoming events. Nettles commended Callahan for his efforts in this matter. Goetten asked Callahan whether in t's opinion, the LMCD was still willing to work with the cities t at did not approve the plan. Acting Mayor Callahan replied. "No. If you look at this list of cities that did not approve the plan, you can see that the majority of lakeshore communities are not for the plan. T:ie LMCD has a situation that is not practical. The LMCD is now focusir ” on shoreland management. They went to the DNR and took their shoreland management regulations, which the DNR was planning to use to make the cities adopt this plan. The LMCD tightened up the regulations a bit. The LMCD indicated that since they were the agency that would negotiate with the cities that they would be able to be flexible about the plan. However, the DNR representative attending the meeting did not agree. He indicated that he wanted the plan the way it was. He assumed that since the LMCD had adopted the plan, that everyone favored it. So basically the LMCD has adopted the DNR plan as their own as part of the Long Tarm Management Plan. However, the LMCD will be unable to be flexible because the DNR has told them what to do. The City needs to establish a plan that is agreeable to the cities listed here that will enable us to deal with the DNR. I do not think we should work with the LMCD under any circumstances. The LMCD has no power. It may be difficult to work with some of these cities because their views differ from ours. It is my understanding that the DNR would now like to establish a comprehensive zoning plan for the entire lake." Goetten asked whether it will be necessary to amend some of - 22 - 4 ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1990LNCD CONTINUED Orono's existing ordinances. Acting Mayor Callahan replied, "It may not be necessary to do that at this point, but we will at a later time." Gabriel Jabbour asked whether all of the cities that are on record as votiig in the affirmati -e for the plan, actually favored the plan. He suggested that some cities may have been unable to convince their representative to vote as they wished them to do. Acting Mayor Callahan stated that the City of Deephaven may be an example of such a situation and that there may be one or two others. Mr. Jabbour stated that in his opinion, it is very important for the cities to select a representative that will accurately reflect its viewpoint. ACCREDITATION Peterson asked what the cost would be for an outside source to come in and go through the accreditation process. Chief Kilbo replied, "I cannot answer that at this moment, but I have a brochure on the program and will provide that information to you." Peterson asked whether it will be possible to objectively do the in-house review. Bernhardson replied, "I cannot say that the review will be 100% objective. However, I think that by going through the review, the areas in which we are lacking will be identified." Peterson asked whether this plan would take a couple of years Chief Kilbo replied, "Yes." Nettles stated that people may wish to know what resulted from their case and suggested that information could be added to the survey form. There were no further questions or comments and Council took no action. 1991 MEETING SCHEDULE* It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Goetten, to approve the 1991 Meeting Schedule as presented. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0. Motion passed. - 23 - ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1990 ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION* It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Goetten, to accept the City Administrator's Information regarding; Response Lorraine Moss, Landmark Suit, Stubbs Bay Sewer, and Windward Marina, Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0. Motion passed. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: The City Attorney had no report this evening LICENSES Goetten stated that she is opposed to leghold traps. She said, "I would like to see the DNR Conservation Officer notified for all of the«5e cases in the event there has been any changes. Kilbo Sv J, "The DNR has to issje the trapping permit. I will check with the DNR specifically to make sure. It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by Nettles, to approve the following license(s): Limited Leghold Trap Permit: Michael and Sally Bosanko 2090 Shoreline Drive One Day Set Up; Art Center of Minnesota Floliday House Motion, Ayes-3, Goetten, Nay. Motion passed. BILLS* It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Gootten, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Motion, Aye-^-4, Nays-0, Motion passed. EXECUTIVE SESSION 10:12 City Attorney Barrett asked that Council hold an executive session for the purpose of discussing pending litigation. ADJOURNMENT 10:21 P.M. It was moved by Nettles, seconded by Peterson, to adjourn the Regular Council Meetiig at 10:21 p.m. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0, Motion passed. Edward J. Calla Acting Mayor ATTEST; Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk - 24 - 4k - To: Planning Cominission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator 3ernhardson Prom: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: November 14, 1990 Subject: Rebers Construction - 2008 Sugarwood Drive - Request to Encroach Front/Street Setback Area List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D “ Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Applicant's Transmittal Letter Site Plan Approved with Building Permit Topographic Map Sugarwoods Plat Amended Site Plan Revised Fax per Applicant's Amended Proposal Determination of Building Pad Area - Total Lot Area = 52,200 s.f. Building Setback Area = 35,000 s.f. Building Pad Area = 17,200 s.f. Allowed Coverage/Hardcover = 13,760 s.f. or 80% Review of Hardcover Approved with Building Permit - House = Garage = Driveway = Sidewalk = Porch/deck 2,090 s.f. 884 s.f. 2,400 s.f. 154 s.f. 373 s.f. 6,201 s.f. or 45% The applicant has filed a request to encroach the 50' front street setback area to allow a turnaround rather than having the turnaround within the front yard adjacent to the house as approved with the building permit (refer to Exh.bit B and applicant's Exhibit E). The applicant notes with the amended proposal there would be a reduction of 1% of hardcover, as turnaround area has been reduced from 505 to 383 s.f. (refer to Exhibit F). Staff has asked applicant's representative to stake the proposed turnaround area within the front street setback yard in order to determine the impact on existing vegetation. Staff has made a site inspection and based on the proposed location, the revised turnaround may result in the loss of 1 or 2 young to mature trees at 10-12" diameters. Upon the staking of the area. Members will be able to confirm the type and numbers of trees required to be removed. 2008 Sugarwood Drive November 14, 1990 Page 2 of 2 Options of Action - Denial, finding the hardships unacceptable? or Approval, based on the findings set forth by the applicant (i.e. hardcover reduction and impact of turnaround on front of house as apnroved with the building permit). Additional November )mments and Planning Commission Recommendation - 1990 Additional Sxhibits - Exhibit G - Staff’s Sketch of Method of Determining Driveway Width at Time of Issuance of Building Permit Exhibit H - Staff's Sketch of Method Set Forth by Planning Commission for Determination of Width of Driveways within Front Setback Area The Planning Commission apprv^ved applicant's request to encroach the front street setback area based on the findings and hardships set forth by the applicant's representative. It should also be noted that upon site inspection of the turnaround area, no trees will be required to be removed. The Planning Commission did condition approval on applicant providing plantings adjacent to the turnaround area to minimize visual impact from road. The area is located within a heavily treed area, it shall be up to the applicant to determine the type of plantings that would be able to survive within a shaded environment. In other discussion, the Planning Commission advised staff that they had not met the full intent of the directives of the original PRD in their method of measuring the width of the driveway, review Exhibit G. The Planning Commission advised staff that all future driveways shall be measured parallel to the street and any driveway that angles as the subject driveway does would be subject to the approval of the City. In the future, all driveways must be aligned in a straight line from the road and any variation would require City ap’^^'cv^al. If Council concurs, the City staff will adopt the methc set forth by the Planning Commission in Exhibit H. Staff will make the necessary improvements to the hardcover inventory for Lot 4, Block 1, located at 2008 Sugarwood Drive. 2008 Sugarwood Drive November 21, 1990 Page 3 Proposed Motion: Moved by seconded by to approve the encroachment of a turnaround resulting in 383 s.f. of hardcover within the front street setback area where no encroachment except for a 20' wide driveway is allowed. This approval is based on the following hardships and findings: 1. There will be no improvement. loss of trees as a result of this 2. There will be a 1% overall reduction of hardcover within the property. 3. The turnaround as originally proposed, was placed within the front yard and has proven to be aestheti.ally unacceptable and poor site planning. 4. Although the prcp«»rty is one of the larger lots within the subdivision i .i excess of 1 acre in area, the building pad area has been limited to 13,760 s.f. 5. The unusual shape of the building pad defined by the required setbacks and the sloping topography has required that the house be placed at its present location. Ayes nays I»nCSEKVE / ^ '^/ ^S2.000.S.F. , SS.JOOiST. / ______Nj_____I jo,n?o..sr. n\ ■ ''"v / PfBVAfE Hv^< /' /r'—t' l ^ J • \ ! > /■*4- ■±2 Jl ! /.U Vy ^£NQ1XFMM.V i v ^AMH * \HOIlitYtlltt n-' '(j 1.. -‘-—i f >_ —r— • — \ \ \ •.200.S.F. \ . yW'.ll'fi n / aa.aoo.sj^. ^1 e ,-j' Y k'VC: 'P- mvAii ■t */ rci P -U V \ V ■t^vi \\U/. .' \i'i V s V'l?.'' / \. f' \ \ ' \\(./ /\J 'm \\ / \ f ^ \ ll____^ --S. lotz,------ * * , ^.•••i . ..•;! '•%. :.»•-. =L ^>5-: : . r-/ V ■ .« ;*•■, .•■ ■ • ' * '■. , ■■■ •-.•*•' >y:; I -. ■tsiTS — g:^|LPt4s» RN3 AP-e^/>------ _... .leyTAL DfeiUfet4AY AP£A,' 1£?TAU PeJKjSD Pfill/fel^AY-APJSA'/ |4H2Xxov^«-', P-eoiXT lopl : fcrr>C ST (W/P^I‘=ao pp.Mri^-U.'i') Z,4<9s?'y* z..:u\t><T 4+A j*-ftor.^tioiic’ loU -ffckXfJ ptoH »T DqCO o/3o/-io / / /X . ')yy // / / i\ - / / / j / \ ' / Mijl'ijiiVi g-c^^ /A\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\ . ,^,,. / y\ / \&\i^' 'i'-}/ 1 \>K L ' vP \ *5 \ •& \ ■ \x» \7 \ 1 / V ‘ 'r TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator November 21, 1990 SUBJECT: Application #1497 Toberman Property Jim Gilbert, Attorney for this applicant has requested Council take no action at the November 26, 1990 meeting until after 8:00 p.m. He is unable to be at tnis meeting prior to that time. L CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 APPLICATION NO. 1497 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION Date of Notice: 11/19/90 TO:Gerald Toberman Toberman Mangement Inc. 11708 Wayzata Blvd. Minnetonka, MN 55343 COPIES:James Gilbert Meshbesher, Singer & Spence 1616 Park Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55404 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance/Conditional Use Permit DATE OF MEETING: November 13, 1990 VOTE: None Required Presented for Council's review and information COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION: Council accepted staff's denial resolution ana as you were previously advised. Council will formally -a^t on the denial resolution at their November 26, 1990 meeting. Please contact my office if you have any questions pertaining to the denial resolution sent to you prior to the November 13, 1990 meeting of the Council. ori'icEs KZtrSKTn .VUSSHIJESHER* RORAED I. MESHBESHER OBR aED M. SINOER RCSSBEE M. SPENCE* JAMBS H. GILBERT* JOHN P. CEIPPORD DENNIS R. JOHNSON • • • JACS NORDBT PAUL W. BERGSTROM PATRICK K. HORAN ^ommo to PAAOTICS Uf Wt»COMSII« «4>MtTTBO TO PRACTICE nt wiBcoRsm * NORm qarota MESHBESHER, SINGER & SPENCE, LTD. 1616 park AVENVE MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA SSaOA '6ia> 339-oun REPLY TO MINNEAPOLIS OEPICE Daniel j boivtn ** MICHAEL C. SNTDER* JAMES A. WDELNBR JOHN P. SHEEHY mark D. STREED Randall o . spence HOWARD I BASS Daniel c ouerrero J K. IVEY •••• Katherine s. elom JOHN t. ORBER **Kuma aOmittbo to PRACTICE IR ILUNOIE • •••ACRO admitted to practice ir trjcae November 19, 1990 City Council CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re; Smith's Bay Marina Conditional Use Permit/Variance 1960 Shoreline Drive Our File No. 28/23825 Dear Council Members: This letter is written at the request of Gerald Toberman and Smith's Bay Marina, Inc. {"SBM") to express an objection regarding the City's effort to deny SBM's continued exercise of the condi­ tional use permit -ite une 8, 1987. The conditional use permit, and pertinent ordinances and law, suggest that denial of SBM's permitted commercial use of the pro­ perty is not warranted or supported by legal authority. The City has decided that the June 8, 1987 permit expired or was abandoned by SBM and, therefore, cannot be used in the future. It is further suggested that this property, a former gas station, be used for residential purposes. We respectfully request that the council reconsider its position. The terms set forth in the June 8, 1987 conditional use permit required SBM to exercise its rights under the permit "by applica-^ tion for a permit within one year ... or the permit will expire" (emphasis added). We interpret this language only to require application, within one year, for a building permit. The condi­ tional use permit clearly refers to application for "a permit , and not to renewal of this permit. The requirement to obtain a buil­ ding permit within one year was apparently included as a monitoring device, that provided an overt act to demonstrate SBM's intention ST, PAIIZ. OPPICE: 2600 WORLD TRADE CENTER ST. PAUL. .MN 08101 MESHBESH ER. SIXGER Sr SPENCE. LTD. Orono City Council November 19, 1990 Paae Two to exercise their rights under the conditional use permit. The renewal requirement was included solely as a monitoring mechanism for the City's zoning board. SBM did obtain a building permit within one year (September 1, 1987) andinide several improvements to the property at a substan­ tial cost. Having complied with this requirement, ^he conditional use permit cannot be said to have expired. Second, the allowed use was not abandoned. Involuntary dis­ continuance of a permitted use does not result in abandonment. Abandonment requires a clear intent and an overt act or omission that clearly mamifests the voluntary decision to abandon the use. See Norton Shores v. Carr, 265 N.W.2d 802, 805 (1978). SBM lacked the’ necessary intent; to the contrary, it performed substantial renovation and construction with the City's knowledge and consent. It also tried to lease the property out. Furthermore, the absence of an overt act which clearly manifests such intent does not exist. SBM did not abandon the commercial use allowed by the conditional use permit. The fact that interruption of use was involuntary is of mater­ ial significance in determining whether there was an intentional abandonment of the use. Temporary suspension of the use, for a reason beyond the owner's control, does not constitute abandonment. Precedential case law suggests that an involuntary cessation of the use, due to an unfavorable business climate, is an involuntary dis­ continuance and does not result in abandonment. SBM was involun­ tarily forced to discontinue the permitted use of the property due to the exigencies of the poor local business climate which resulted from the severely lowered Lake Minnetonka water levels. In the past, the City has considered economic hardships rela­ ted to this property, due to circumstances out of the owner's con­ trol. The City, at that time, "expanded" the property's allowed use from a gas station to a transmission shop. (See paragraph 30 of Proposed Resolution). Similarly, if there has been a gap in use now, it was due to the historically low Lake Minnetonka water levels, which virtually destroyed all boating related businesses. There being no intent to abandon the permitted commercial use of the property, no overt act demonstrating such intent, and no voluntary discontinuance of the use, a claim of abandonment does not lie. Therefore, if the current request for boat sales and MESHBESH HR. SINGER & SPENCE. LTD. Orono City Council November 19, 1990 Paqe Three_ _ _ __ service is considered an expanded use, it is ? similar economic hardship. If the current proposal is denied, the existinq conditional use permit would remain in existence boat sales, nautical shop), because there is no voluntary intent to abandon such use. we continue to be amenable to a fair and non-litigious resolu­ tion of this matter; however, considerable time, effort and money Save already Itln eioended to make this investment a success. If thr-expinded- use is denied, the existing use should surely be allowed. - — In addition to the two arguments set forth above, alternative factory relief. SBM has relied, in good faith, on ^ ^ , use is^now withdrawn would likely subject the City to liability under the vested rights doctrine. Finallv. if the City continues to assert that the property can ii<5e or benefit, the landowner must receive just compensation. that restricina the use of 1960 Shoreline Drive to single existing zoning regulations. V. Los Angeles County, 482 U.S. 304 (1987). AS always, SBM remains willing to discuss this matter to arrive at a fair alternative solution. However, as set fo MESHBESHER. SINGER & SPENCE. LTD. Orono City Council November 19, 1990 Paqe Four_ _ _ __ above, we feel that a number of legal avenues are available to suc­ cessfully seek relief via the judicial system, which would allow this prooerty to cont lue to be used for limited commerc'.al uses. Sincerely, MESHBESHER, SINGER & SPENCE, LTD Jaimes H. Gilbert JHG/nj Thomas J. Barrett Geradd E. Toberman A RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 5 (E) A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 5 PILE #1497 AND WHEREAS, the City cf Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, pursuant to State Statute 412 et. seq. and 462 er. seq., the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted zoning regulations for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; and WHEREAS, Gerald Toberman of Toberman Management Inc. (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in the property located at 1960 Shoreline Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Tourangeau Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit per Section 10.03, Subdivision 5 to allow non-conforming commercial use of the residential property involving a boat sales/ship store; and WHEREAS, Section 10.03, Subdivision 5 (E) requires a variance fcr a non-conforming use of property as commercial use of the property has been discontinued for over a 12 month period of time; and WHEREAS, the applicant has discontinued use of the non- conforming use for more than 12 months; and Page 1 of 13 KHEREASr the City Council has reviewed the application; the recoirme-dations of the staff and Planning Commission; and the comments of the applicant and applicant's attorney. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby denies the conditional use permit and variance for the property described above, based upon one or more of the following findings of fact concerning this property: FINDINGS 1. On November 14, 1978, Ordinance #214 was adopted rezoning the property to LR-IA, single family lakeshore residential district. 2. A portion of the property was originally zoned B-1, commercial. 3. The LR-IA zoning district requires a minimum of 2 acres in area; the property consists of 11,435 s.f. or .26 acres in area. 4. Comparable use in a commercial district would have the following minimum area requirements; B-1, B-4 and B-5 would require a minimum of 20,000 s.f. in area; B-2 and B-3 require a minimum of 2 acres in area. In 1978 at the time of the rezoning of the total property to LR-lA, a gasoline sales/auto repair business existed on the property. Prior to the 1978 rezoning this use existed as a permitted use requiring a conditional use permit. The LR-IA zone does not allow gasoline service station use. Portions of the gas station use encroached into the surrounding LR-IA zone. 5. On December 18, 1978, the City adopted Resolution #961 establishing a conditional use permit for the operation of a lawful non-conforming use of the property. Page 2 of 13 6. Under Orono Municipal Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 5, a conditional use permit is required for a legal non- conforming use as automatic condition or result of the rezoning (e.g. adoption of Ordinance #214). 7. Conditional use permit issued pursuant to the adoption of Resolution #961 allowed the property to continue to be used for the existing gasoline sales/auto repair use subject to all pertinent sections of the non-conforming use sections of the Orono zoning code and to special conditions set forth in Resolution #961. 8. The property continued to be used for gasoline sales, auto/transmission repair through May/June of 1987. 9. On June 8, 1987 a conditional use permit was gr'-'nted to the applicant for a boat sales/nautical shop. No boat repairs were to be performed on the site, and as such the boat sales/nautical shop use was considered a less intense commercial use of the residential property than the gasoline sale auto repair use. 10. Resolution #2193 was considered based upon the standards set forth in Orono Municipal Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 5 (J) and conditions contained in Orono Resolution #961. Orono Municipal Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 5 (T) provides as follows; The non-conforming use provisions of the zoning chapter apply only to the use to which land and buildings are put and do not apply to situations where location or height of structure, lot size or other factors not involving the use of the premises prevent strict conformance with the requirements of the zoning chapter. Where, however, such a situation existed legally under the prior applicable law, the Council Page 3 of 13 will not unreasonably require strict compliance and will generally look with favor on granting of a variance under Section 10.08. 11. Orono Resolution #961 states as follows: Other uses may be considered by the Council upon application and upon the finding that the proposed use is less non-conforming than the above permitted uses. 12. After the approval of the conditional use permit (Resolution #2193), th : applican** obtained permits necessary to prepare the building for th sales use (i.e. removal of underground tanks, remodeling of building and installing of air conditioning). 13. Early in the summer of 1987, the applicant learned that the persons who were to operate the boat sales business were no longer interested in operating a boat sales operation on the property. 14. During the rest of the summer and early fall of 1987, the applicant attempted to sell or lease the property for boat sales use. If the City received calls from persons interested in other uses, they were a^-'sed of the need for a conditional use permit. 15. After a phone call from the api it, the Zoning Administrator sent a letter on January 1988 advising applicant of limitations of the condi lal use permit granted in June of 1987. The letter reads as follows: "Dear Mr. Toberman: This letter is written to confirm matters discussed in an earlier phone conversation relating to the use of Page 4 of 13 the property located at 1960 Shoreline Drive, If a boat/sales oneration is in use by June 8, 1''88, a new conditional use permit will not be required. The original conditional use permit approved for your boat sales use will expire on June 8, 1988. As we discussed, any other commercial use proposed for the residential zoned property will require a new conditional use permit review in order to permit a non- conforming use. Please contact my office if you have any further questions on this matter. Sincerely, Je-' ne A. Mabusth, Bu ding and Zoning Administrator 16. At no time prior to the June 8, 1988 deadline was the property used for a boat sales/nautical shop or any other use that v;ould have been permitted under the applicant's conditional use permit. 17. In a letter dated August 16, 1990, James H. Gilbert, applicant's attorney, notes as follows: "My client will never concede that there has been a lapse of commercial use on this property. There is no question because of other hardships relating to the Marina, there has been a decreased use, but there has been a continual use of this property for commercial purposes related to the Marina business. This has included, but has not been limited to, the storing of property, the conducting of meetings, the storage of boats and other Marina equipment, sales and leasing Page 5 of 13 efforts relating t miscellaneous commerc e Marina property and Dther work. 18. If the uses noted : Mr. Gilbert's letter of August 16, 1990 took place on the prc^ 'rty, the applicant knew he was violating the non-conforming use sections of the Orono Municipal Code. Any of the usc»s described in Mr. Gilbert'is letter would have required the applicant to seek a new conditi'^^al use permit. 19. Mr. Gilbert's letter of August 16, 1990 goes on to note: . .thit property ir an integral part of the Marina". Prior to 1987, the properties located at 1955 Shoreline ive and 1960 Shoreline Drive were under separate .ership. In 1987, the applicant acquired both properties. . storically, there has never been a connection betwe'^n the properties either ^n use or ownership. It should be noted that 1960 Shoreline Drive and 1955 Shoreline axe aivided by County Road 15. 1960 Shore 1 ne Drive is zoned LR-lA lakeshore i-sidential ar^d 1955 Shoreline Drive is zoned B-2 lakeshore commerciai, 21. In 1987, Application #1112 was filed bv the applicant and involved a c'>mprehensive land use review that incluJed three properties purchased by the applicar • within the Crystal Bay neighborhood; 1950, 1955 and 1960 Shoreline Drive. rr A) 1350 Shoreline Drive was residentially zoned property (LR-IA) that was residentia 1ly used 1. residential units). The applicant proposed the removal of all structures and the installation of a parking lot for the use of the marin? ?.t 1955 Shoreline Drive, "’he Page 6 of 13 City Attorney advised that the City could not approve the proposed use because the use was commercial and would be in violation of both Orono code and S^ate Law. The City would have to rezone <he property to commercial. The City denied the request. B) 1955 Shoreline Drive is zoned lakeshore commercial. The City approved variances for the construction of a new clubiouse and other site improvements. C) 1960 Shoreline Drive, a residential zoned property, had an established legal non-conforming use, gas sales and auto repair. Based on the findings already noted in this resolution, the City approved a boat sales/nautical shop use. The City specifically granted approval of this use because there was to be no specific connection to the marina use on the east side of County Road 15 and no service of boats because the physical limitation o. che property. It was clear throughout the review that the props : I960 Shoreline Drive had no connection with the operatr.^n of the Marina at 1955 Shoreline Drive. File #1112 is hereby referenced to confirm this finding. 22. On January 29, 1990, the applicant filed a conditional use permit to permit boat .sales and service use at property located at 1960 Shoreline Drive (Orono File #1497). The current application involvuj an expansion with the servicing of boats. This use was specifically denied in the review of Application #1112 because of the limited size of the property. 23. On March 19, 1990, the Planning Commission voted (3 ayes, 1 abstention) to recommend approval of a conditional use permit to allow the property located at 1960 Shoreline Page 7 of 13 Drive to be used for boat sales and service. The Planning Cononission further directed the City Council to seek fart..er advise from the City Attorney regarding the legality of this approval under Orono Municipal Code Section 10.03r Subdivision 5 (E), since commercial use on the property had ceased over 12 months ago and the current application for a conditional use permit involved a change in use from the conditional use permit approved in 1987 (File #1112). 24. On April 9, 1990 the City Council considered the applicant's request (File #1497) for a conditional use permit. The Council conceptually denied the conditional use permit application that would allow a continued commercial use of the residential property and directed staff to draft the appropriate denial resolution for formal action by the Council. In addition, the applicant was asked to provide a plan for the restoration of an approved residential use on the property and asked the applic ?nt to meet with staff within the next 30 days to discuss a plan for restoration. 25. ' the request of the applicant and applicant's atto ey, Jim Gilbert, the Council once again reviewed i he conditional use permit application at their Augusi: 27, 1990 meeting. The Council reaffirmed it's original action to deny the conditional use permit. The applicant's attorne./ sought direction on the specific issue raised in Finding #17 and #19 noted above. 26. In a notice of Council action dated August 30, 1990, the ap'^Iicant was once again asked to meet with the Orono staff J develop a plan for a -asidential use of the property. As of this date the staff has not been contacted by the applicant. 17. The City has been advised that the property continues to be offered for commercial sale and use. In a phone Page 8 of 13 conversation (October 15, 1990) with an attorney for a potential buyer, the City was advised that the property is being offered for sale for joint use with the Marina property located at 1955 Shoreline Drive. 28. Orono Municipal Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 5 (A) provides that; "the non-conforming use may not be changed to another non-conforming use". 29. In a memo to the Zoning Administrator from the Assistant City Attorney, Suesan Pace-Shapiro, dated March 8, 1990, t' e City Attorney commented on Resolution #961, approving the 1978 conditional use permit which allowed a legal non-conforming use on the property. Resolution #961, Item #6 provides the following: "Other uses may be considered by the Council upon application and upon the finding that the proposed use is less non-conforming than the above permitted uses". 30. In 1978, the City approved the continued commercial use of the 1960 Shoreline Drive property for gasoline sales and auto repair. Since that time the City allowed an expansion to include transmission repair of automobiles and small trucks in an attempt to assist the former owner during the "gas shortage/higher price" years when the business was in danger of failing. 31. On June 8, 1987, the Council approved Resolution #2193 granting a conditional use permit for a limited boat sales operation finding that use to be less non-conforming than the gasoline sales/auto repair/transmission repair use.I Page 9 of 13 32. A boat sales/ship store use was never installed on the property. No permitted commercial use has been made of the property since the gasoline/auto repair use ceased in May/June of 1987. ■*3. Condition #5 of Resolution #2193, approving the 1987 ;onditional use permit for a boat sales/nautical shop, provides the following: "authorities granted by this conditional use permit run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this conditional use permit will expire on that date (June 8, 1988)." 34. Applicant and applicant's attorney argue that the language in Condition #5 is misleading. Applicant and his attorney argue that Condition #5 is satisfied because the applicant obtained a building permit to make the necessary alterations to the property for a boat sales/nautical shop. Finding #15 set forth above negates this claim. Applicant had adequate notice concerning tl ' expiration of the conditional use permit and the legal status of that permit. 35. Orono Municipal Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 5 (E) provides: "Whenever a lawful non-conforming use of a structure or land is discontinued and remains discontinued for a period of 12 months, any future use of said structure or land shall be in conformity with the provisions of this zoning chapter". 36. The 1987 conditional use permit has lapsed since a boat sales/nautical shop was not in use by June 8, 1988 and the Page 10 of 13 m applicant failed to request a renewal of the 1987 conditional use permit prior to its expiration. The applicant may orly use the property for purposes permitted in the LR-IA lakeshore residential zoning district. Retail operations are not permitted in an LR-IA district. 37. Minnesota Statute Section 463.357, Subdivision 6 provides in part; "The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the governing body, as the case may be, may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under the ordinance for property in the zone where the effective person's land is located." The Council cannot approve the current application for a conditional use permit-. 38. The property located at 1960 Shoreline Drive was entitled to a conditional use permit when the property was re' jned in 1978 from B-1 to LR-IA. Since the granting of that original conditional use permit, the City has continued to grant many concessions regarding the use of this property, based upon findings that each new use was less non-conforming than a previous use. 39. In 1987 the property was granted a conditional use permit because the sailboat sales and nautical shop retail operation was viewed as less non-conforming than a transmission repair business. 40. The property has not been used for a legal non- conforming commercial use for more than 2 years and per Section 10.03, Subdivision 5 (E) of the Orono Code, the 1967 conditional use permit has lapsed. Page 11 of 13 : 41. The City Council cannot grant a use variance, pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 463.367, Subdivision 6. Any future use of the property must be for a permitted use in the LR-IA zoning district. 42. In review of specific findings noted above, it is apparent that the applicant had received adequate notice advising of the expiration of the 1987 conditional use permit. The 1987 conditional use permit expired June 8, 1988. The current application for the commercial use of the property was filed January 24, 199v. 43. The property can be put to a reasonable allowed use. It can be combined with the adjacent residential property also owned by applicant but applicant has failed to meet with staff to discuss options for residential use of the property. 44. The intent of the application is contrary to the intent of the Orono Comprehensive Plan. 45. The granting of this conditional use permit and variance would establish an adverse precedent in the City. 46. The applicant had full and complete .. awledge of his rights and risks re^ rding the non-conformrng use of this property, any alleged hardship appears to be self-imposed. FURTHERMORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Orono continues to encourage the applicant to work with the City to develop a reasonable residential use on the property. If dimensional variances are required to accommodate such residential use, the City Council may consider the granting of reasonably needed variances to install such use. Page 12 of 13 on this ATTEST; Adopted by the Orono City Council of the City of Orono day of November, 1990. Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James P Grabek, Mayor STATE OP MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _ _ day of November, 1990 by James R. Grabek & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 13 of 13 Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson n 'n- i^ Fron: Date: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator November 21, 1990 Subject: #1532 Fullerton Properties, Inc. - Approval of Entrance Monuments &*Final Landscaping Plan •• 2; O'VV} Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.03, Subdivision 16 - Tra-fic visibility. List of Exhibits - Exhibit A Exhibit B Entrance Monument Site Plan at Entrance (Willow Drive/Shadowood Drive) Exhibit C - Bolder Wall/Landscaping Intersection Cox Farm Road and Shadowood Dr Planting Legend Landscaping Along North Property Line Exhibit D Exhibit E A) Landscaping Plan - Refer to Exhibits D and E. All proposed plantings are to be installed out of the 10' bike trail that runs along the north and west side of the property. Land alterations along the north will not impact the existing drainfields as all drainage will be directed away from drainfield areas. Plantings will not impact sighting at intersections of County Road and Willow Drive. Gaffron will review final landscape plan to reaffirm that there is no negative impact from the proposed plantings or land alterations upon septic test sites. Unfortunately, the size of the landscape plan submitted restricts the City's ability to reduce as a single unit, but we have attempted to copy pertinent sections of that plan for your consideration. B) Approval of Monuments/Walls - Please refer to Exhibit A. The monuments will be over 6', approximately 6'3"-4'’ at the peak, and 3' in depth. Review Exhibit B, monuments have been placed within the road outlot. The Public Works Director cannot approve the placement of monuments within the road outlets and recommends that they be placed within the private property adjacent to road outlot. In the past, the City has approved islands within entrance areas to a s*'bdivision. Such improvements were subject to specific design stai.dards that necessitated the enlargement of the road outlot. Applicant need not expand the road outlot if monuments are placed within the private property. Appropriate easements must be taken over the landscape areas to allow continued maintenance and upkeep. Zoning File #1532 November 21, 1990 Page 2 of 2In reviewing the site plan for the entrance monuments (Exhibit B), the setback from the intersecting curb lines adjacent to Shadowood Drive meet the 30' setback. The setback elong Willow Drive from those same intersecting curb lines has not been met. Review Exhibit C. The applicant proposes fieldstone bolder wall with the landscaping proposed at the intersection of Shadowood Drive and Cox Farm Road. Note walls are placed within private property lines. Once again, staff advises that appropriate easements be taken to maintain subdivision landscaping. Staff has no further information as to the height of the bolder wall, but the plans suggest that this may be part of a low-profile landscape configuration, the walls do not function as retaining walls. No land alterations are proposed within the area. Proposed Motions Moved by ___, seconded by ____, to approve the final landscape plan for Fullerton Properties Inc. per plans by Land Habitat Inc. dated 10/16/90, revised 10/22/90, and the bolder walls proposed at the intersections of Shadowood Drive and Cox Farm Road and the entrance monument to be installed at the intersection of Willow Drive and Shadowood Drive, subject to the condition that entrance monuments be placed within the private property adjacent to road outlot and that the location of the monuments be subject to the directives of Section 10.03, Subdivision 16 of the Orono Municipal Code that would require a 30' setback along the projected curb lines of both intersecting streets at the intersection of Willow Drive and Shadowood Drive. Ayes _ _, nays _ _. .. ; r vr--^ ;^*iiliii''>i^~i7flFWi #; y / <S=TLl! f'aj W/ 15^-Z& ^€^(i|?SlZ. a45»*a»STE ‘Vt/OKirl' jMPMr ip^ii i Wt? .?'. \ V. N ‘^-C=r Z' ;iL5;"jL;l«i SH-tit-y McJNUMe«ot . ' fiu.Aia-5 ^1 II ' *f !>=•-;« 1 j WAfPtpv^v'dTtfpO < ..v’ , I ICS- V^rAejf^. M«7p*^ . Ask -n2€6 WH.V , A«i/i%K Io>-«v P<^ MraJM *n2^ {crec::-') A^ w' €> |'^^0'^ JUJ^ i7E::4C^i>^:>u6 ^bvn#»rto*»'* LildlKz. 1#' / R^u;e^S F^SAt^vu^ f24^X ^ ^)l^U U ax • {:®l " J ‘. ‘j f! i ■, •»fi ‘ ? ^ ■ V. ; ;' 3; ;, ■■i ; I •i ■• •[> ‘ I •t,' I • Iv i! I '■Ti•I ■:'[{ 3 iS ^lamHiabitat f t- -V:? . >-»' *Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Date: Subject: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator November 20, 1990 #1591 Orville Fisher, 3300 Fox Street - Conditional Use Permit/Land Alteration - Resolution Zoning District - LR-lA, Single family lakeshore residential, 2 acre, unsewered Application - Request for filling/grading permit, more than 100 cubic yards of fill, outside 0-75' zone. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Resolution Planning Commission Action Notice 10/20/90 Planning Commission Action Notice 10/16/90 Memo & Exhibits of 10/12/90 Discussion - Please review the memo and exhibits of October 12th. Briefly, applicant proposes grading work on the property to improve drainage. This work is outside the scope of the grading approved with the construction of the house and pool. This work is south of the house in the area around the sewage treatment system. The grading work will redirect drainage away from the septic system and southward towards the lake rather than towards the neighboring property. The City Engineer has recommended approval. Note for the record that the applicant had done grading work in the 0-75' zone for which violation tags were issued and which has been restored and resodded to staff's satisfction. Planning Commission Recommendation - At their November 19th meeting. Planning Commission recommended approval on a vote of 6-0 finding that the intended work will improve drainage on the property, subject to absolutely no work allowed in the 0-75' zone, and subject to the City Engineer's recommendation for approval. Staff Recommendation - Staff recommends approval per the attached resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 FILE #1591 WHEREAS, Orville Fisher (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 3300 Fox Street within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows; Tract A, Registered Land Survey #727, Files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin. Tracts C and D, Registered Land Survey #1358, Files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit to permit land alterations involving more than 100 cubic yards of material and outside the normal scope of a new residence building permit, pursuant to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1591. 2. The property is located in the LR-IA Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. On November 19, 1990, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the application as proposed and recommended approval on a vote of 6-0, finding that the proposed grading work is generally necessary for the redirection of drainage and protection of the mound sewage treatment system. Redirection of the drainage will tend to reduce the impact on neighboring properties of additional run-off created by the new residence. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the community. Page 1 of 4 ...._J 5. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the proposed land alterations will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit pursuant to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 to permit grading and filling work in excess of 100 cubic yards and outside the scope of the normal building permit grading approval, subject to the following conditions; 1. Absolutely no grading work will be allowed in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone. 2. Grading work shall adhere to the approved plan attached hereto as Exhibit A, with the following stipulations: A) The swales around the mound system must carry a 2% or steeper grade to minimize the possibility of standing water adjacent to the mound. B) The swale along the west lot line shall be constructed to keep the majority of the drainage on the site. 3. Upon completion of the grading, applicant or applicant's contractor shall provide appropriate erosion control measures as may be required by the City Inspector, to be maintained until such time that the graded area is revegetated. 4. Applicant or applicant's contractor shall obtain the necessary grading permit prior to commencement of this project. 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 2 of 4 6. The undersigned owner has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 26th day of November, 1990. ATTEST; Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 26th day of November, 1990, by James R. Grabek & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public L. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to ine to be the person(s) described Tn and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 4 of 4 CITY OP ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 ZONING FILE NO. 1591 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 473-7357 Date of Notice; 11/20/90 TO:Orville Fisher 3300 Fox Street Long Lake, MN 55356 COPIES TO: TYPE OF APPLICATION:Conditional Use Permit DATE OF MEETING:11/19/90 VOTE: 6 For 0 Against Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval as submitted NOTES AND SPBCITU:. CONDITIONS: Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as; City Council Monday, November 26, 1990; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the Planning Commission. _ _i CITY OF ORONO P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING PILE #1591 NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Notice: 10/16/90 Orville Fisher 3300 Fox St. Long Lake, MN 55356 COPIES TO; TYPE OF APPLICATION: Conditional Use Permit DATE OF MEETING: October 15, 1990 VOTE: 4 For 0 Against Planning CooBLission recommends the following: Tabled for reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Tabled because neither applicant nor a representative was present. This item will be rescheduled before the Planning Commission at their November 19, 1990 meeting. Meeting begins at 7:00 p.m. Please advise staff if you or a representative cannot attend. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Clerk ifter review and approval by the Planning Commission. ■I '■ J'jr i J i;- To: Prom: Date: Subject: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson sMichael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator October 12, 1990 #1591 Orville Fisher, 3300 Fox Street - Conditional Use Permit/Land Alteration - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IA, Single family lakeshore residential, 2 acre, unsewered Application - Request for filling/grading permit, more than 100 cubic yards of fill, outside 0-75' zone. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Site Evalution Exhibit E - Proposed Grading and Drainage Plan Exhibit F - Documentation Regarding Activity in 0-75' Zone Exhibit G - Comments From City Engineer Pertinent Facts - 1. Applicant proposes grading work on the property to improve drainage. This work is outside the scope of the grading approved with the recently completed construction of the house and pool. 2. Proposed grading work covered by this application is generally south of the house and in the area around the mound system and south of the pool. This finish grading work will help to redirect drainage away from the septic system, and help to protect the neighboring property by generally directing run-off southward towards the lake rather than westward towards the neighboring property. 3. City Engineer Glenn Cook has reviewed the grading plan and his comments are attached as Exhibit G. Zoning File #1591 October 12, 1990 Page 2 of 2 Discussion - The grading completed to date on the site generally includes grading associated with the house and with the pool. Additional grading work in excess of 100 cubic yards is generally necessary for drainage redirection and protection of the mound system, however, the extent of the grading and fill work was such that staff felt that a conditional use permit was in order. All of the gradim work for this application is outside the 0-75' protected ^.one. Planning Commission is advised that the applicant did initially do grading work in the 75' protected lakeshore zone involving 0-3' of earth removal in order to provide a more gradual slope to the lake. This work was discovered the same day it was initiated, all work was stopped, tags were issued, and the property owner was ordered to restore and sod the 0-75' zone to its original grades and condition, which was subsequently completed to staff's satisfaction. Although no topographic map of the pre-existing condition was available, staff members had viewed the site both before and after the illegal grading work, and staff is satisfied with the restoration. The 0-75' zone was sodded directly after grades were restored. The 0-75' grading work was done without approvals even though staff had informed the applicant in a letter last December that such work would require a conditional use permit. The property owner has choosen not to pursue the conditional use permit and will live with the grades in the 0 75' zone as restored. Note that the property owner did pay the fines associated with the violation citations. Staff Recommendati->n - Staff recommends approval of a conditional use permit for grading work outside the 0-75' zone as proposed, per the recommendations of the City Engineer. CITY OP ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLTCA'/lON PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 3 3 C C. X _ _ _ _ J 4 ' / •• j ; 1 J r CFFICE I:z0j00vi)0 k Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) I TT - Z, Z H'i Please attach legal description to .pplicaticn if not inciuded"' ’ ' on required survey. APPLICANT Name /(PF1////<! /V5>f.e r Phone (home) Phone (work)<?3.g-_ i-if Address 3 3 cr; (P /P'c >c S.y.City /C^o A_.'c‘ Zip ^ 3 -^4- OWNER ^-.5 different than applicant) Name ^ Address Phone (home) Phone _ _ _ _ City _ _ _Zip. Date Property Acquired ^ /le adi: (month/year) I (_d^ (do not) also own the Adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee _ _ _ _ $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application _ _ _ _ $125.00 Residential accessory Use _ _ _ _ $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) _ _ _ _ $150.00 Guest Kouse/Guest Apartments _ $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg _ _ _ _ $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land AlterationIt. Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) _ _ _ _ $250.00 Vacation _ _ _ _ $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _ _ _ _ $250.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) _ _ _ _ $100.00 Appeals _ _ _ _ Other - see fee schedule PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request ^n detail: nJ j- / /a A^’ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepi. County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map. 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). 6. Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). 7. As an addendum to this application, ’.ease attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified c this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff: ___________________ Date_________________ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional jes (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this "*Dplication, and certifies that the information supplied is true and corrp^ vo the -best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Date Tc- OWNSRS SIGIWTORE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and veri^cation of this request. Owner Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. !■ r i RUN DAT! Oa/ta/M BATCH 001 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OMT4ERS LIST PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR PROP AOOR OMNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR PROP AOOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 38 05-117-23 AI 0014 00565 LEAF ST J I C MC COY JOHN L A CHARLENE M HC COY 5525 HILLSIDE CIR EDINA rt4 55435 36 05-117-23 44 0002 03400 FOX ST JAMES G FULLERTON III ET AL FULLERTON LUMBER CO P 0 BOX 30 MPLS MN 55440 3B 05-117-23 44 0005 03400 FOX ST JAMES G FULLERTON III ET AL FULLERTON LUMBER CO P 0 BOX 30 MPLS MN 55440 38 05-117-23 41 0025 00575 OXFORD RD J T HALE ASS HALE JAMES T HALE A SHARON S HALE 575 OXFORD RD L0T4G LAKE MT4 55356 38 05-117-23 44 0003 03300 FOX ST O E A A G FISHER ORVILLE A ALEXANDRA FISHER 3300 FOX ST L0T4G LAKE MN 55356 TOTAL BATCH 001 00007 REPORT NO. PAGE PI4354011 38 05-117-23 44 0001 03350 JAMES G JAMES G P 0 BOX MPLS MN FOX ST FULLERTON III FULLERTON III 30 55440 38 05-117-23 44 0004 03250 FOX ST GEORGE H DIXON GEORGE H DIXON 121 WASHINGTON AVE S RM 617 MPLS MN 55401 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTAIiON OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEL4NEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT,OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. / / DATE / .ADDITIONAL SITE EVALUATION INFORMATION FOR CHIP FISHER & STEPHEN BRUCE CO IN TRACT C, R.L.S. # 1358 ORONO, MINNESOTA tS^'3* ■■•} ; J er . /*. a-' t ■ i.- 3-24-90 Q 1 On August 19-20, 1990 an additional alternate septic system area was tested to the east of the former alternate area. This is because of the grading traffic over the former alternate area and the risk of compaction of those soils. This new area was relatively undisturbed and had re­ sults from the percolation testing and soil borings which would be acceptable for a mound system should the need ever arise. This area must be kept undisturbed. It would also be wise to keep the present undisturbed area northeast of the house as is for another potential site. Additional information follows. If anything else is needed, please notify us. Sincerely, PERCOR, INC. Mark S. Gronberg murnilm M- vV_,. «■• i:.*v r\ •'■•■■/V A /Z-//*/> ?:■: 't ^ HENNEPIN COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT DISPOSITION SUMMARY CITY OF ORONO TO: FROM: DATE: City Administrator Chief of Police Bryan L. Crawford^ Prosecuting Attorney October 2, 1990 DEFENDANT: Orville E. Fisher, Jr. Cc"' A OFFENSE(S) : Excavation in Lakeshore without within 75 feet of Lakeshore; and Excavation within a Flood Plain DATE OF OFFENSE: August 14, 1990 ARRESTING OFFICER: Lyle Oman CONTROL NO.: SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS: The defendant pled guilty on September 12, 1990 to all three charges and paid the fines. 94 DCTY -10- ' ..vr .1;V ^ • f- ▼XOLATlOa 10OKT tOMXM V2O1ATX0II XmVlCTOll LYLE OMAN lADQi fsai OmiOMIT XVPOMATXOH OrrlU* M. ri«h«r Junior •Aiv . :• ■:,; '/.f~ i" ' , . . . ' s . XU* : ; • si;* ♦ • • ^»'•.,•• •- • OATB OF VIOLATXO^t^agiWtil4#5i**Pj»i'fe » ‘ SSS^.S.'^r^S'f^.5S?7.i!:’US!S3-S ’• - “s; iKKS;; th« Tiolatlon. all^«d. Violation of Saction KsrusiSSJS'.“ Aaaistaiit Planning • toning Adniniatrator# that it waa allowad without a conditional uaa parnit. - Photon hava baan takan. - Tha City'n objactiva in to fina tha . *5? i:tT."u:v2.rriri«t tn.»«, boM until rantoration in natinfnctority cooplatad. • *. jim RFOIJEST FOR ARREST REPORT TO: FROM: Orono Police Department Bryan L. Crawford Prosecuting Attorney 3300 Piper Jaffray Tower Minneapolis, MN 55402 DATE OF REQUEST: September 20, 1990 Orville E. Fisher, Jr. fJATlTRE OF OFFENSES: Excavation in Lakeshore w/o Council, Excavation within 75' of Lakeshore, Excavation within a Flood Plain TICKET NUMBERS: 3900467071, 3900467089, 3900467097 ORPTNANCE (STATUTE) NUMBERS: 10.03S19, 10.22S2, 10.55S6 ARRESTING OFFICER: n/a DATE OF OFFENSES: August 14, 1990 51 DCTT Orville E. Fisher. Jr. 5501 N orman Ce.nter D rive Minn E-XPOLIS. MN 55437 (612) 830-3241 DA cnvcf ORONO September 4, 1990 ;SER 6 1980 1: I Michael P. Gaffron Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Gaffron; I am receipt of your letter dated August 28, 1990 regarding the grading work done on my property at 3300 Fox Street. This letter is to confirm my understanding that we have complied with all seven items contained in your August 28 letter, including meeting the specific dates that were referred to in Items No. 1 and 2. I understand that you are out of the office this week and ^re unavailable until next Monday. If there are any other issues or if for some reason the city does not feel that we are in full compli­ ance with the items we discussed on August 15, which were subse­ quently incorporated in your August 28 letter, please let me know immediately. In addition, I believe documents and other filings have been timely filed and are in order reflating to our request for a conditional use permit for purposes of grading an excavation on rhe site which I understand will be presented to the Planning Commission on September 17 and subsequently to the Orono City Council on October 8. If there are any problems in this schedule or the i.". format ion as provided, please contact me. Youds .truly< Orville E. Fisher, Jr, OEF/jo 1* »^ h •k: L CITYof ORONO CITY ORONO Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323• Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka August 28, 1990 Orville Fisher 3300 Fox Street Long Lake, MN 55356 RE: GraOj.ng Violations Dear Mr. Fisher: This letter is to follow up our discussions of August 15, 1990 regarding illegal grading excavation and filling occurring within the 0-75* protected lakeshore zone on your property at 3300 Fox Street. The grading work done by Bollig and Sons under your direction is a violation of the following sections of the Orono Zoning Code: 1. 2. Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 (copy attached) Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 (copy attachted) 3. Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 (copy attached). f Accompanying this letter is a citation issued for violation of the above noted Zoning Code Sections. Because grading work in the extent and nature of that completed requires variance and conditional use permit approval from the City Council, and because such approval would normally require approximately 8 to 10 weeks to process, you were directed by City staff to restore the 0-75* lakeshore protected zone immediately to limit the potential for erosion and sedimentation into the lake. City staff set the following time table for the restoration work: 1. Within the 0-75* lakeshore setback zone, restore the property to the original grades as established by you, your contractor, and City staff, such areas to be sodded no later than Friday, August 24, 1990. 2. Soil testing for an alternate site to replace the alternate drainfield site which was destroyed by earth moving equipment traffic, shall be completed and submitted to the City by August 31, 1990. BUILDING A ZONING-473*7357 ASSESSING administration a RNANCE - 473*7358 FAX-473A510 PLRUC WORKS - 473-7359 jOrviile Fisher Augus^i 28 r 1990 Page 2 to be submitted immediately. .. ,r.j. n« “i;:”; ,rv.v.uUU If'.”".” s pi*" .‘d" I'oV'fb" and approved before that work would be allowed. 5. Immediately place fencing sewage treatment mound to protect it from all traffic. 6. Your surveyor was to verify the location of the west lot line. 7 The excavation where stumps were buried to the of hhe sewage treatment mound, must have the st^ps removed (taken off site) and grade restored. KUiJ^v,r.'.*str.v.;fp3 work on the property so manner. If you have anysi.'sr.rri”.".Mabusth at 473-7357. Sincerelyr MichaelP. Gaffron Assistant Planning 6 Zoning Administrator CCJ Lyl. Oman, Senior Building Inspector jSanne'^lSbuatht^Building s zoning Administrator Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator v^-l .- I ■• ... •-« ••♦ -■ ''390 ^467071| • ^ ■ -a«a»-:^-=^s.^^mmi2lSI2IlJ5SI5!i^^«~"*i‘' " *5 .,'^—j.'-Cir •-' •-■■.•^>> -!'r.*'V: -r * wfeiiliMBBBBBBPBSnBC L *• . . 1~''. * *~ ^hn '- ■ v/i-V^'»:»'- ■-------..' ''-'_ ■ '• • • _- V-.' . . • I !c.»v ->: . wi^ ^ - AI .r".;i-,-; -A ’^•\r * - ■^* ■ *'.z ^ ■■■nnnnnqggilsgBilli j^' r , • - ■* .■ ■ ; Tim «»■ ’ ■ ..■» . .* . ... »' nriarinmnEmHEL^ccBB g38C3BBS5ESSEE^^^sgg **-f ^ I’ _ • • ___'4 .V VT--, V' EBBiSOliillBelEilsF^E^.^ a^#?'-'''-'-r:'; - .* > ^■►■'.r 1 : < ^^^^^^^r3^:646708| ■■ ■ ____________________________________• T-r~-^ >« Ml » * • ^'4*■' *#'•» ^i 1 «lH!c'lt.l♦ 6*c N1 ^ III eT“** -TTrr toemm t 1 1 ! i 1 .. ■ %n '- 1^ . ^ ■•' :2 ■ -^i - -i"^1 f • ss^sshj i ••«■** * . - ‘ . • • ■ 4I1V-.J JklMM ■ i rlt iH 9 'o|I U *oo! I I - 1.- X Tj'*:’— 2r*- I:j7*. V,*.. : - — ^ *- U "1.' -:»•-•,•• •:; '.•M • ' * *• * • ^ Ot/ll ". uU^#j/cic|^l VI A r 1 r . "iwj_Tilt.t 1,^' .la <klu A, »:L« n ;0|^y I ir |K |0 I * 1 * UI^I I -J—I—mmmm □ QHpSo^f^ ^ ^ ^ ^;-v;=N vv ■•:<« •'.--:»<•• •*W-r wit EBBEEagalsSaS^-^SSSl^^pm * v«». ■390-0467091 £~ - —^»;iift,ffa8sa^ .ui.i .i.n.m^|..U-i|.«M4. fll s!hW!k.b!ft!>4 ^ Iw 4. Id €1 1 1 1 'I'll 1 Jmmmrn»€0t^ mi - 'f'* -- ;^-*.-'-.r,- •.',*<* '.4*» ■•/. 'o* 1^0 n' ■Ml* sir I ■ M , iiyi,i„,..','i !K!B9IBCIZZZ!I I :h ^ 011 I t e o III I . rt-^Ti-iiT'i li •- », •: •• • 5^!• ^ rc^ wwvwwvinraMnnBn • • - *%il . •••.j***i‘ . ej,-.^»'—C;> *—. nBDn;noQEDCS!:E&r:Er;n!:! OBBEZaEBBCCCaeSC^^SQtBBBIBBBBBE?aEEEE2=:^t■HBSBBSBEB95ESe»SCS? m Dm ft Sobj«cts 3300 fox Strmmt Nicha«l P. Cxffron, A**t Planning 4 Zoning Administrator August I4» 1990 Land Altaration in 0-75’ Lakaahora Protactod Zona, No Parmitt v.i ' - ^ This sftsrnoon. Inspector Bruce Vang was inspecting the he was told by his boss and he believed that Mr. Pisher and Mr. Steven Bruce (Bruce Coepanies, the general contractor for the house) had net. on the site prior to the work and he was Just following ordorn.1W. ’l«»«Jl«toly iMuod a Stopproieet* sent all'the sub-contractors hone# and I left the si^ to attesmt to contact Mr. Fisher and Mr. Bruce. Inspector Bruce Vang and eventually Mrs. Fisher showed up at which tine she and Bruce discussed the violations that were occuring. tine# I contacted Chip Fisher’s office and was told by his secretary that he was out of town until Thursday. I then nade contact with Steven Bruce who assured ne that his intent was to have hay bales placed along the lakeshoro, although he would certainly assist in the followup# he was not part of the loop with Mr. Fisher hiring a grading contractor. I notified Mr. Bruce that I need to meet with himself and Mr. 4 Mrs. Fisher toworrow aorning at 9t00 on th. ait. to diaeua. lamadlata restoration and protection of the site. I advised him that X axpactwl hia to follow through with .roalon prot.ctionb.caua. it is likely that we will be getting rain tonight according to the radio. As a point of reference# I met with Mrs. Fisher on December 6# 1989 and on December 7# 1989 sent a letter to she and Mr. Fisher documenting our site inspection inspection of December 6th# and verifying clearly what could and could not be done as far as grading work on the property. Thic letter was applicant’s surveyor and to Bruce Companies# the contractor. Obviously# this letter has been i^ored jjV property owners and the builder. I noted for the letter of December 7th that there is likely ^*5^. J.? Joatlfication for the City to approve any regarding within 75 or the shoreline. It appears that they have done this anyway. My only reasonable recommendation is that this 5.T ^Mi^iately and City staff will recommend denial should an after- the-fact application be forthcoming. _ _ ORONO CITYof ORONO Post omet Bot M*Cry«««i Bay. Mini On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka 7r 1989 a53aa*M—irffi Mr. * mt«. »ip Fifh*' .•v;»*■#♦> '.-.r \ 4UQ0 '’•Fox Str««tyfr f "Sn5'Ml«.^HH#553« ^ application for a fudly resideneo on your P”P*^J* SSIstruction of « with Mrs. Pishar on Oaceobar 6, is.l^nd lotl*d f 01 loving additional cos».nt»: 1 your itated intent is to com^Vt^sd ?SniS^ ^cXlVctlon lo ’:?!. subdivision 7 <••• allo2l continue! P*™“ tho issued »ith your building P«f>iJ,“5f:Sd'Ss;”i<rr‘; j ~“,':^s;.dVs:”w :ss.'?5“°' new home. ^4no Although a dacision on th«ho^rnaad not b. aada b«fora the i»«.n^^^ «=50«T FROM pansit for tho new ona, we do na. EXISTING ?00 MOW FOR *E«SS?*po^«ciP^ CONSTRUCTION.RESIDENCE DURING NEW PRINCIPAl. 2.options for tha old house are as follows. prop Tear it down. ..s/4 have it moved off the the structure and^ have C) Su--*Vida so «•’*« in’thaYtcrl separate parcel - onough to accomplish a:;k.,v.v.i. ............Standards might be necessary). ;.40.twr AOMtsyornuTioN i rc^scx • 473.73a nU(-4734«l« ptiLic woeia - 47iv7ja 1. > ! j • (i. • MT«. Chip rilh.r, 3300 POX Strot Oacfloibcr 7» 1989 Pag« 2 of 3 li.»%? p-?rz°;„ii;/ro.: ■/.“=rioV!s.Vo: ^^AVir/o^n 3 (G). ro» h.v. ln<ile.t.d th.t t?oSr..'inr «If “ *-v=u..;r*“ "“iSvsi'uS to movo Into thm now houao. ^ . j XSSS?2r'">”™“;s;.ffiv>?.:'t“;.‘.v.t........... from proporty linoi. a A alta Inapoctlon indicatala' your propoaad f***2*““; H-1 ;is? “.V... .i. City roqulrononti oro not. 5. Th. “.PM« “Ai!'r‘oS5 raeord, it la standard city m raqulra a roVd\;roMrta’'a^“V‘r»rt typ. !t -a was avar conoidoroda ’ c:v •> MM 3300 Fox Stroot ___—a*.1 hv th« ■ lit*'- L-. *'.■ rt' •.?■-:*».•■ rnera; , eenatrueeion piwy. ^l«ato contmet mo toon AO At non pOAli))^0 if looAtion. qoAttiioni a V PlAAAA -V.. Cronbtrg BruoA CoBpAnioOi !:i:5‘«aS;aSfrSSAln, Ad»lni.trator LakA St, WaytatA 55391 r '•.c2^ f ...• • ■ p- Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson y From: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator November 14, 1990 Comprehensive Plan Amendment #3 0 List of Exhibits - Exhibit A - Packet Previously Submitted to Planning Commission for 10/15/90 Agenda At the October meeting of the Planning Commission, members voted to table all action on the review of proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment #3. There were only 5 members present and the Chairman felt that the matter was important enough to require full membership of the Planning Commission. Once again, note that this is a minor amendment involving the inclusion of areas already receiving sewer and to locate these areas within the MUSA district. If Members have any questions or seek additional information, please contact staff prior to the meeting. It is imperative that members provide a final recommendation for the Council because of the Metropolitan Council's deadline. Additional Comments and Planning Commission Recommendation - November 21, 1990 The Planning Commission unanimously voted approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment #3 as proposed finding the proposed realignment of the M.U.S.A. line would only involve areas within the City already served with sewer. Staff will draft a resolution of the Council approving Comprehensive Plan Amendment #3 and the necessary transmittal documents to the Metropolitan Council for formal action at your December 10, 1990 meeting. Proposed Notion: Moved by _ _, seconded by _ _, to conceptually approve Comprehensive Plan Amendment #3 and to direct staff to draft the appropriate supportive documentation for presentation at the December 10, 1990 meeting. Ayes _ _, nays _ _. i L Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson I Prom:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: October 11, 1990 Subject: Comprehensive Plan Amendment #3 List of Exhibits - Exhibit A - Systems Statement - Orono E. hibit B - MUSA Line per Metropolitan Council Exhibit C - MUSA Line per City's Records Exhibit D - Bernhardson's Memo 9/14/90 In 1989, the City received a systems statement from the Metropolitan Council providing updates on systems within four areas: sewers, transportation, parks and open space, and airports. The City was to review the statements to see if their current comprehensive plans and codes were consistent with the Metropolitan Council's findings. The systems statement is enclosed for your review and consideration. After several months and a formal request for delay of the Metropolitan Council, as the City was obliged to submit a Comprehensive Plan Amendment in October of 1989, the City asked for an extension to October 1990. At the September 24th meeting of the Council, it was decided that the City would proceed with a minor Comprehensive Plan Amendment readjusting the MUSA line to include areas already sewered but not included within the MUSA boundaries and to provide a supplemental memo updating certain population forecasts, etc. As the City Administrator's memo of September 14th advises (Exhibit D), in reviewing the status of the Highway 12 corridor planning, it would be premature to develope any extensive transportation plan or make any changes to the original plan approved in 1980 until the corridor is defined. Upon resolve of the location of the corridor, the City would proceed with a major Comprehensive Plan Amendment. At t' at time it is hoped that the City may consider goals and policy ;hanges regarding public vs. private roads in the City. The Planning Commission is asked to review and act on the proposed MUSA line realignment incorporating properties already approved and served by sewer and not included within the M.U.S.A. as defined by the Metropolitan Council in their current systems statement. Please review Exhibits B and C, the current MUSA boundaries nand the map drafted by staff. Note the following sewered properties will now be included within the MUSA boundary: Comprehensive Plan Amendment #3 October 11, 1990 Page 2 of 2 Hackberry Hill (property sewered since early 1970s and somehow excluded from MUSA) Properties on east and west side of County Road 64 or Old Crystal Bay Road Properties along North Shore Drive East of Noerenberg Park through Scotch Pine Lane The Art Center of Minnesota 650 North Brown Road. 1988 Systems Orono nformation Statement ■f III. METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK (MDIF) A. Geographic Policy Areas The MDIF established policies for different geographic areas within the metropolitan urban and rural service areas. These geographic polic' •reas are the setting in which the Council and local governments prepare and carry out their plans. Part of Orono is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and part of it is located in a rural service area. The urban and rural service areas in Orono are separated by a MUSA line. A map of the MUSA In Orono is found in Section 0. Orono should refer to the policies in the MDIF for the MUSA and for the Rural Service Area as it prepares plan amendments in response to this systems statement. The MliSA is defined as that part of the region in which urban-scale development and investment should be located. It is that area where the Council has made a commitment to providing metropolitan system service capacity, in accordance with the regional system plans and with local comprehensive plans that are mutually consistent. B. Forecasts of Population. Household and Employment The Council has prepared forecasts of year 2000 population, households and employment for each county, city and township in the region. The forecast data for Orono Is listed on a data sheet that is contained in this part of the system information statement. It is important that you review the year 2000 forecasts for Orono, since the local comprehensive plan forecasts need to be consistent with Council forecasts. You should contact Council staff In the Comprehensive Planning Division if your community's plan anticipates a higher level of year 2000 population, households or employment than c<* rent Council forecasts. The Council uses the year 2000 forecasts as an indication of where growth Is likely to occur, and thus where metropolitan system services will be needed. The forecasts are also used when the Council reviews a community's request to change Its MUSA boundary and extend metropolitan services to new areas of development. The 2000 forecasts are reviewed when local development trends are found to vary substantially from Council forecasts, when unanticipated development is proposed, or as part of amending the local comprehensive plan. The Council revises its local forecasts every five years, using U.S. Census data as a base. The next revision of the forecasts will be made in 1992. At that time, the forecasts will be extended to the year 2010, and new estimates of local land supply and land demand relative to the MUSA will be prepared for each community and county in the region. - 1 1983 Systems Information Statement Orono Data Sheet for Orono 1. Forecasts of Population , Households and Emp1oyment PoDulat ion HousehoIds Emo1oyment 1980 1980 z.^\1980 M70 1990 1990 ■2.. "CO .'990 2000 2000 Z-PCO 2000 ti?CC 2010*& -rm 2010* ^.7m 2010*nco *Note:The 2010 forecasts are used for system sizing purposes 2. Estimates of hUSA Land Demand and Land Supply,1980-2000 1980-1990 1991-2000 Land Demand Resident I a 1 Commerc i a > Industria 150 5 o Public -2 Streets AI 1evs _ Parks Total 1980-1990 Land Demand: Total + 1991-2000 Land Demand: Total 1980-2000 Land Demand: 1980-2000 Land Demand with five-year overage*: acres tro acres Z£g acres acres Residential density ■ - 3 cL dwelling units/acre *The Council believes that the urban service area should contain at least a five-year oversupply of urban land within each community. (b) Land Supply 1980-2000: Current supply: iZJb acres , acres The land supply figure reflects the net developable area inside the local comprehensive plan/urban service Iine—excluding water, wetlands, bedrock, floodplains and any covenanted agricultural preserve lands. The Council’s land supply figure includes platted but undeveloped lots as of I98O. Ill - 3 kpI117/PHENVi»e6 01.31.89 r’ 1988 Systems Information Statement Orono For purposes of sizing metropolitan system facilities, the Council has prepared forecasts of local population, households and employment for the year 2010. A primary reason for making these forecasts is the long lead time involved for the planning and investment decisions that are required to ensure system capacity to serve the anticipated growth. C. Data Sheet for Orono The data sheet is included on a separate page. D. MUSA flap A map for Orono is included on a separate page, E. Plan Amendment P’-ocess The Council has aaopted guidelines for the plan amendment review process These guidelines and process apply to all local plan amendments. A copy of the guidelines document. Metropolitan Council Guidelines for Reviewing Local Comprehensive Plan Amendments, is attached as an appendix to this systems statement. Council staff in the Division of Comprehensive Planning and Local Assistance are available to assist you, if you have any questions about the process. Communities are encouraged to discuss plan amendments with us before they are formally submitted for Council review and comment. II I - 2 Hill 1988 Systems Information Statement Orono II. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT Orono (Developing Community with Metro Seir/lce) A. Policy Plan Revisions And System Information Information in this section is based upon the revised Water Resources Management. Part 1. Wastewater Treatment and Handling Policy Plan. September. 1988 (copy enclosed). The Policy Plan should be consulted by Orono in preparing an amendment to the sewer element (sewer policy plan) of ts comprehensive plan. Of particular importance to Orono will be the po!• ies related to water quality and sanitary sewer services, and the "Content Requirements for Local Sewer Plans," (see Section C below). 1, Metropolitan Service (Developing Area) The forecasts of population, households, employment, and wastewater flows for Orono as contained in the adopted Wastewater Treatment and Handling Policy Plan are listed below. These forecasts are for sewered development. The sewered housing forecasts were calculated by multiplying the Council's household forecasts for each year by the vacancy ratio for each community. The community's projected total population, households, and employment fo 1990 and 2000, as indicated later in Part III, could be somewhat different due to the development served by on-site sewage disposal systems or private treatment plants. 1990 2200 2010 4,700 5,000 5,800 1,800 2 -^00 2,400 600 600 700 204-217 223-237 259-284 Sewered Population Sewered Housing Sewered Employment Wastewater Flows (mgy)* ♦million gallons per year The flow projections represent the Council's commitment to a level of service, ass'tR<r,g the Council's underlying demograph.ic forecasts are maintained. Ai stated in the MDIF, the Council will vary local flow projections based on verified growth as well as the lack of growth. As stated in the revised policy plan, flow projections do not re -^fut an allocation of interceptor capacity except in the event a temporary system constraint occurs. II-l 1983 Systems Information Statement Ccono At a minimum, the Council and Commission will reevaluate flow projections every five yeirs in conjunction with the Council's review of the municipal forecaiits. However, the Council and Commission will also monitor individual local governments' flows annually for significant changes. The Council and the Commission will use these population and wastewater flow forecasts to plan all future interceptors and treatment plants needed to serve your municipality. Orono, through its comprehensive planning process, must decide the location and staging of development, and then plan and design its local wastewater collection system to serve this development. If you plan a total wastewater flow from your municipality in excess of the Council's forecasts, your assumptions will be analyzed by the Council for their possible adverse effects upon the capacity of the metropolitan system. When developing your plan, you should not exceed the projected flow for your community or the capacity of a metropolitan facility without first discussing the need for this with the Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Vaste Control Commission staff. If necessary, detailed information regarding metropolitan facilities is available from the Commission. Contact the Municipal Services Section at 222-8423 for this information. Map II-A shows the location of metropolitan facilities serving your municipality. Existing or planned metropolitan facilities serving your community are as follows: 6-OR-641 MWCC 7113 MWCC 85-67 Lift Station Lift Station Lift Station Lift Station 44 Lift Station 43 Lift Station 42 49 46 45 2. On-site Sewage Disposal Systems Management The Metropolitan Land Use Planning Act requires the sewer element (sewer policy plan) of local comprehensive plans to describe the standards and conditions under which the Installation of private sewer systems will *'e permitted and to the extent practicable, the area not suitable for public or private systems. The revised policy plan states that on-site sewage disposal systems are appropriate to serve single-family residences at development densities of 4 units per 40 acres or less if local governments adopt a management and control system consistent with federal and state laws and Council guidelines (Policy 2). It is the Council's position that all municipalities and counties allowing on­ site systems incorporate MPCA regulations (Minn. Rules Chapter 7080) as part of a program for managing on-site systems in the sewer element of their local comprehensive plan, and implement the standards in issuing permits. The program should include the keeping of permit records, licensing, correction of II-2 igure ^-A METROPOLITAN SEWAGE TREATMENT FACILITIES NORTH MINNETONKA AREA (INCLUDING THE CITIES OF LONG LAKE. MAPLE PLAIN. MINNETONKA BEACH. ORONO, WAYZATA AND WOODLAND) A' MAPLE PLAIN LONG LAKE WOODLANI MINNETONKA^--- »np:s:/ -I?!#".--7073^^1 ■ Wa8t« walar traatmont plant MM Exiating Intarcaptor mm .Propoaad Intarcaptor O Lift atatlon • HI Porea main — — Community boundary 1 Milas Map sourca: Matropolltan Wasia Control Commission 1988 Systems Information Statement Orono =-P«h.nslve pla^s poUutlonl'bL^r^^ed'br 3.Management of Private Wastewater Treatment Plants S"V“P"-r ■Si L"“—;—; :ra"tSh... E - - 2T,“ :E--rPlan States that private treatnent facilities should be peraitted only if they are provided for in Council-approved comprehensive p s an are in full accord with the local comprehensive plan (Policy 12). element (sewer policy plan) of its local be^lloMd^ ? “""lap “hlch private treatment plants would f!cllJrT!^’ '^’’a location (map), capacity and flows to existing i“ ‘‘aalare that under no circumstances will private wastewater nHl^on ^ "I'f acceptable. If there is a later change in the community's position or poli-y. a plan amendment should be submitted for Council approval. *• Baceminins Whether a Plan Amendment Ts It may not be necessary for Orono to prepare an amendment to the sewer element (sewer policy plan) in its current comprehensive plan. If Orono’s plan or expactatlons for development meet the following conditions, the comunlty My choo«a not to prepare an amendment to the sewer element of its comprehensive plan. The community should submit Instead a statement to the Council certifying thet the community's plan or expectations for future development meet ell of these conditions. If the conditions change, an uen ent should be filed at tiiat time. Some of the conditions listed may not oe applicable to your community. 1. the community agrees with the Council's population, household and employment forecasts for 1990 and 2000, 2. the com^ity is in agreement with the Council's forecasts for sewered population, housing, employment and wastewater flows for 1990, 2000 and 2010, • increase is planned in the community's projected wastewater flows for eac . metropolitan interceptor from those stated in the community's current Council'approved sewer element, II-3 & 1988 Syscems Informacion Scatement Orono poli=t« consls^nc w^h councu on-stc, «»ag, disposal syscej ’as pers^ef; ^i^clng syscen. problfn.s aL craLnLnl of' a«ea^alao allowing densUlas In excess of 4 units per 40 ellmfnr^f incorporate post-installation inspection and mainten :e 5 j., ® part of their on-site system management controls policies forth! r*"*" comprehensive plan is consistent with Council ^anL -nanagemerst and control of private wastewater treatment 6. no change In the MUSA is expected cr planned at --e current time and Cl,e."° ar. planned ac“he’curr^nr 8. a communal drainfield has been constructed or expanded since the C.Edrmat And Contenr Pf Plan A^1enr^^,Ar^^<. S! clarifies the content and fonsat requirements for both locJ r "la"’ a laaal comprehensive plarLd the lllnl) Tr tTt"" Requlre^nts for Loc^l S^wer oiro^bo^h !?^cS! laaal government to prepare amendments to eove™ent» !L formulating proposed amendments local ^ve^encs should follow these guidelines. The policy plan establishes a two-cler system for the preparation and review of local sewer plans and ' information, which constitutes the sewer element or sewer tfa«e^Control*c“^"?“*?'’' ''*''^*”*<1 *>y f**® Council and Metropolitan comfr.h^n.f! ‘^‘’■“iaalan- Tier II information, which constitutes tL Co™i!^?on f«‘»“l>'a»«nfa. -lU b« reviewed only by theCommission. Tltr II should be submitted rp the Comnlsslnn only afrer rh. Council conmlerea f t*avf au t _ j _i_ se—vui,T_. \ s USeSS^enr*"'"^ ^ qdoprs th^ Advisori ?!** ”®= "inl'^a l™«diata action on the part of local g mnents, but it may affect local sewer planning in the future. ' Communities with Metropolitan Service Regarding PTan states that excessive Infiltration of jroundwater and of^r cfn!^«'* » slgiliflcant Impact of ®P®"f^»n Che metropolitan system and that local units of government should review their respective I/I problems and prepare II-4 19S8 Systems Information Statement 3rono (PoUcy”r" ThrMWCC°3lU*prepar^ comprehensive plan addressing th. Council In D.«»b.r 1990 .MessLrn th "«=>>nlc.l reports, due to® th« BOtrepollcan system Impacts and 2? the community and sncourag. local gov.mm.n« co nduce /I Uc^ « after 1990 if they need to address this *>* notified will be required to submit an amendment to the governments comprehensive plan addressing eh« nT-o-,, .-4 sewer element of their months of receiving their 1992 sys«rst«e»ent “l^Kln 9 reduce the p”?"„ Jlly" sh 0^2 ^^ rr*"* ‘ ^o their proposed sewer plan amendment. SerPollcy°PUn^«onceit for Local Sewer Plans) for the Information to be provlif^ ’''■’“dements II-5 I. TRANSPORTATION A. Introduction The Metropolitan Council has revised the Transportation Development Guide/Policy Plan . Orono needs to determine whether a local comprehensive plan amendment is necessary to demonstrate consistency with the revised transportation policy plan. Orono should consult the full ^ext of the Transportation Development Guide/Policy Plan in preparing any amendments to its local plan. B. Signlflc .nt Policy Changes Significant transportation issues will affect this region over the next 20 years. These issues include: growing commuter traffic on the region's highways; - the need for expensive replacement and improvement of much of the region's highway and transit infrastructure; and - the inadequacy of transportation funding to accomplish these improvements. Because it is impossible for the region to build its way out of congestion, the revised Transportation Development Guide/Policy Plan is based on a "constrained-demand" approach. One of the plan's main premises is that careful maaigement of the regional transportation system can help maintain the good access to regional opportunities that exists today, despite the IsuTge growth in travel demand expected in the future. Orono needs to determine if comprehensive plan amendments are needed to address highway, transit and land-use issues. Actions that Orono may need to implement are indented and set off with a o . 1. Highways The 2010 metropolitan highway system is shown in Figure 1, and a description of system roadways within the city of Orono is included in Section IC. Orono should expect increased traffic levels through 2010 both on the metropolitan highway system and on local arterials and collectors. The new Transportation Development Gulde/Pollcy Plan recommends a mixture of capacity improvements and traffic management strategies to address those future traffic problems. State and local units of government are expected to provide a minor arterial system that is adequate to accommodate shorter trips (less than five miles), eliminating these trips from the metropolitan highway system (see policy plan Appendix F). o The city's comprehensive plan should contain a street and highway component that includes a minor arterial and collector system adequate to handle local traffic. This system should take short trips off the metropolitan highway system and provide continuous travel through adjacent communities. r tr 2. Transit The revised policy plan (which defines transit as all forms of riding together) makes a significant commitment to reverse the trends of declining transit ridership and auto occupancy. Contributing to this increased transit use will be expanded employer rideshare programs, reverse commute transit to serve suburban employers, circulators within regional business concentrations, increased transit for elderly and disabled people, and upgrading of existing regular-route services, including implementation of light rail transit (LRT). The transit system is shown in Figure 2. The policy plan advocates direct involvement by cities and major employers in transit by creating a physical envirorunent that encourages transit use. Council Policy 5, identifies appropriate transit services within Orono. Orono should work with the Regional Transit Board (RTB) in identifying transit needs and coordinating special transportation and rideshare services. Orono's comprehensive plan should reflect its transit needs and plans. The policy plan for the first time advocates development of light rail transit (LRT) in this region and identifies six priority corridors where LRT could be cost-effective by the year 2010. No corridors in the plan are proposed to directly serve your community, although communities without direct LRT service may still benefit from new or redirected bus service connecting with nearby LRT lines. The County Regional Railroad Authority, which is currently responsible for LRT implementation within the county, has prepared, or will be preparing, a comprehensive LRT plan to further explore LRT potential that may affect your community. It is important that all affected municipalities participate in planning studies related to LRT implementation. The Transportation Development Guide/Policy Plan advocates preserving linear rights-of-way, such as abandoned railroad lines and surplus roadway rights-of-way, for future public use, including LRT. Orono should address these aspects in a comprehensive plan amendment, if appropriate. yrC. Metropolitan Hi;^hway System Facilities The information in this section is derived from the revised policy plan, from interagency corridor studies, and information from the Minnesota Department of Transportation. This section of the systems statement identifies the metropolitan highway system facilities within Orono, summarizes current and anticipated 2010 roadway characteristics, and indicates programmed and planned improvements that are consistent with the Council's policy plan. Orono's comprehensive plan transportation element should address the information contained here. The metropolitan highway system is shown in Figure 1. Appendix F of the Transportation Development Guide/Policy Plan describes the functional classification of these roadways, interstate freeways and other principal arterials, as well as local highways and roads. The following portions of the metropolitan highway system lie within Orono: r- Metro Highway TH 12 fron Independence Apprcx. Old Crystal to 3av Head Number Through Lanes, Excluding HOV lanes: 60V lanes: Access: Level of Congestion: Other Comraents: DPF105 Existing (198^-88) Conditions Pregranned Conditions (TIP) Planned Conditions (2010) 2 Same Same None Same Same At Grade Same Same Minor/Moderate Severe JL fr 1ii i; Metro Highway _ _ _TH 12 fron Old Crvstal 3av to CH 15 Number Through Lanes, Excluding HOV lanes: HOV lanes: Access: Level of Congestion: Other Comments: DPF105 Existing (1986-88) Progranned Planned Conditions Conditions (TIP) Conditions (2010) None At grade Moderate Same Sane Severe i--r METROPOLITAN HIGHWAY SYSTEM CONGESTION LEVELS (Vehicles Per Lane) LEVEL METERED FREEWAY UNMETERED FREEWAY EXPRESSWAY ARTERIJ MINOR < 17200 < 14000 < 9600 < 7000 MODERATE < 19350 < 15750 < 10800 < 7875 MAJf < 21500 < 17500 < 12000 < 8750 SE !E > 21500 > 17500 > 12000 > 8750 Source: Mn/DOT Testimony on Transportation Policy Plan DPF107/PHTRN2g5 IIjj. i.iipwupp n 1. Imroduaion The infotmatior. ‘ 'ir.ed in this section is dcri'^ed from the Tvised policy plan and from the Regional Tran*: (RTQ'i Transit Service Needs Assessment and other studies. Tins section identifie.' v^..sting metropolitan transit services and .ilirics. and idenufics appropriate impr .tents to the system. The City of Orono s>'.ould work w iuh the RTB in amending its comp Shensive plan transit element The Council would like to emphasize tire importance of the city' s role in planning and development of effective transit services. WTiile it is important that the city prepare an adet^ ate transit component of the comprehensive plan, it is even more essential that each city create an environment that encourages ridesharing and transit :ise. Examples of ' "el'^^ment site designs and street improvements diat foster transit, including ridesharing, are louiid m the "Handbook on Traffic Mitigation". This handbook also includes examples of city oidinanccs that encourage employer and developer commitment to transit, ridesharing and other travel demand management efforts. 2. Existing Transit Services Existing transit services in Orono are ouflined beiow. For more detail on transit services, see AttaclLaent E: RTB's Transit Scrv'ice Needs Assessment Subarea Market Analysis. (.a) Existing Regui 41'Services Service is operated in the City of O.-ono by the Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTO. The MTC operates one local route, route 5 1 . and one express route, route 75, through Ororo. More detailed information is includ M in the atuched Transit Serv ice Needs Assessment ( fSNA) Subarea Analysis. (b; Existing Rideshanng and Travel Demand Management (I'D'T Efforts Minnesota Rideshare provides rideshare services ;■ < c,mmunitics. ar.J individuals in the Twin Cities M'". pditan Area, vuiiuesota Rideshai^ provides pool matching services to individuals localized and regional marketing, and tcchmcal assistance to employers and v'tc* i ir? developing ridesnarc fr»grams at the work site. (c) Existing Park-and-Riu o Lots Tlie Ciiv of Orono has one park-and-ride lOi wir*' a capaci'v of 25 parking spaces for poolers and bus riders. This lot is desenbed in more'^etail i: uhe RTB's Transit Service Nee.^ Assessment Subarea Analysis locat''*< m .'michment F. (d) Existing Elderly and Disa*x'd Ser. ’ces Special transportation for elderly and disabled pers.>’ Mobility service. 3. Transit Scivicc and Facility Needs s provided no by .Metro The following needs and .strategies have been idenuricu .o improve transit scr. Ne in the City of Orono. It'- Regular Rouie Ser/ice Needs Transit needs for the City of Orono arc dc ailed iii the attached TSNA Subarea Analysis. Generally, this includes implementation of the 1-394 timed-transfer recommendations. (b; Ridesharing and Travel Demand Management (TDND Needs Communities, employers and developers should play a greater role ir. ^ -moling ndesharing and creating a favoraNr environment for iL (c) Transit Facility Needs The City's plan should include transit stops and shelters at major activity centers and new developments. In new developments, passenger waiting areas, bus pull-ins and bus turn­ arounds should be considered. Additionally, sidewalks should be placed along major routes to encourage bus usage. (d) Elderly and Disabled Service Needs The City of Orono should work with the Regional Transit Board and providers within the city u. planning elderly and disabled services. (e) Light Rail Transit Service Needs The City of Orono should coordinate with the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority (HCRRA) on the development of an LRT plan for the county. 4. Implementing Transit Services and Facilities The Regional Transit Board can provide leciinicai assisiana samining or implementing these identifiee ^ivices and facilities. City be a / involved in this proces. jf evaluation, implementation and monitoring. nee .. . preparing the transit e' .;neni or your comprehensive plan, contact RTB Plar.. it 292-8789. rr£. Land Use and Socio-economic Forecast Relationships As part of responding to new directives in the policy plan, Crono will need to demonstrate that its land use plan is related to its forecasts i.cr households and employment at the Traffic Assigr*ment Zone (TA2) level. This section provides 2010 population, household and employment forecasts for each TAZ located within Orono. 19&0 Census data is provided at the TAZ level for comparison. Orono should review the TAZ level forecasts in Table 1 and, if necessary, submit suggested revisions by June 1, 1989. Any redistribution at the TAZ level should be consistent with the 2010 municipal totals for population, households and employment. By Oct. 1, 1989, Council staff will finalize the 2010 forecasts based upon the community's input and negotiations with city staff, if necessary, and will determine whether those changes will further affect the metropolitan highway system. In addition to the TAZ forecasts, information is provided in this section regarding conversion factors by land use type that will allow calculation of theoretical levels of population and employment at maximum jpment. The city should compile the land use data for each TAZ in Orono, using the land use categories and conversion factors found in Table 2. ihe citv should also differentiate between existing development and additional development anticipated by 2010. If either the categories or the conversion factors are not applicable or workable in Orono, please contact the Council so we can resolve this issue prior to the completion of a plan amendment. The ciuy will note that several commonly used land use categories are not listed in the table. These include public and semi­ public uses and vacant and agricultural land. These categories were not included because they tend not to contribute to peak hour traffic. ORONO/PHTRNieS w $■ lAULfcl: SOCIU-ECONOMIC I^UKEtASrS BY 1AZ l2:OS WEDNESDAY. FEBRUARY 22. I9B9 139 OBS TOTPOP8 TOTPOP2I CITYNAME>‘ORONO - Tornua totmuzi TOTEMPB rOTEMP21 RET8 RET2I 708 709 710 711 712 713 751 752 753 754 755 756 955 1694 1717 717 386 1376 1 144 2029 2057 859 462 1649 425 525 561 217 1 12 451 587 723 775 340 156 619 25 35 63 40 55 252 37 53 95 60 82 373 4 14 O 14 5 38 6 21 O 21 8 56 CITVNAME 6845 8 200 2291 3200 470 700 TOTPOP“TOTAL POPULATION TOIEMP^-TOI AL EMPlOYMENI THE 8 SUFFIX REFERS TO 1980 TOTMU-TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS NEI-REIAII EMPLOYMENT THE 21 SUFFIX REFERS TO 2010 : 1 i •5 .V I I—h' TASLE 2 LA^^) USE CONVERSION FACTORS RESIDENTIAL* Very low density** Low density** Medium low density Medium high density High density Very high density Less than one unit/acre 1-3 units/acre 4-6 units/acre 7-12 units/acre 13-24 units/acre Over 24 units/acre * Communities may collapse the number of discrete categories as appropriate to their individual circumstances. **Very low and low density will be calculated on a gross density basis (including streets, open space, etc). Multi-family categories will be calculated on a net basis. NON-RESIDENTIAL Office Retail Industrial Warehouse Mixed use Public and semi-public 3.3 employees/1000 square feet* 2 employees/1000 square ff.et* 2 employees/1000 square feet* 1.3 employees/1OOO square feet* Local determination Local determination * Communities may use another value if they adequately document trie reasons for differing with this value. These values are based on rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers and actual measured rates in the Twin Cities. JM3243 /-r ’igure 2 lETROPOLITAN TRANSIT YSTEM. 2010 Proposed LRT Corridors ,Downtown and Regional Business Concentration Circulator Services r~] Central City Regular Route Service ^ Fully Developed Suburban Services Developing Area Services Rural Paratransit Freestanding Growth Center Circulators 91490.5 d) TO: PROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrat September 14, 1990 SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Responses ISSUE - Present to Council proposed changes in response to Metro Council's transportation and sewer chapters. INTRODUCTION - At the beginning the City had explored possible changes including those related to public and private streets and what changes, if any, might be to areas for possible sewering, such as Stubbs Bay that are currently not sewered. Transportation - Given the current highway corridor study it is recommended that the response to Metro Council indicate such and that once complete the City will develop any amendments that may be needed to its comprehensive plan. As you are well aware, the Highway 12 corridor study could have a substantial impact on the transportation facilities in the community and it would be prudent to await the outcome of the study of the corridor. That may have the most substantial change on the transportation in the community. Sewering - Apart from incorporating areas that have been sewered in the past that are currently not included in the comprehensive plans, and possible minor changes to the code in order to comply with the on-site treatment requirements, no other changes are recommended n response to sewer at this time. ACTION ALTERNATIVES - 1. Determine what changes should be brought forth for Planning Commission consideration. 2. Table. 3. Take no action. POLICY - 1. Undertake a minimal response including the comprehensive update to the MUSA line in the community based on areas already sewered. 2. Undertake substantial modifications in response to these plans. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that a minimal Response through a minor comprehensive plan be processed through Planning Commission and Council for submission to Met Council. At this time the City does not have sufficient data to amend any of the data absent the census data that is still in a preliminary form. As such only minor recommendations for amending the forecasts are proposed as a com.mentary. Vi) PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by only minor amendments at this time. Ayes _ Council recommends Nays f m Bones troo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Ono G 3cr>?'.tTio toOM JV ttoitre '’E C AnOff’.if. PE Wa^vin Scn.*J “E Picraro £ ■urrt' ■’E Jarr«M C C'JOn P£ Gwn P Coo« PE TNxrji E »E PoC^Tt G Sc.^jr^ri »£ Sown M Et»nin C PA Engineers & Architects November 5, 1990 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Mr. John Gerhaidson Re: Pumphouse No. 3 City of Orono Our FUe No. 13950 :r * Ooracr ^E Pcna-o A' feat'. PE CcnjKj C PE .etry A BouiOcn PE Va-» *■ ‘^arior P£ >3 ^ PE Vcrac! T Paotmann PE PtX^ P PWTW P£ Giii'<3 O LOSttW. PE •n/jmas '.V PKersen P£ V<nae ‘ C ^>txn PE -arnpi p vaiara "E P ^rvjtnon PE Van g PrjPv PE Poom C PuiSPk, A I A "-c.-aj £ Anguv PE -owafc A Santofa pe Djr^ j E'jgerryi pE Va/« A >o PP o- -ti Cai'A^ PE ifraf* Vaftn^/. PE •.‘jfn D aaiH PE *~on-.as » Ar^ffv;-! A Gan- • pywrv»' PE M»« B .f"Jen PE L pp.,.c HI PE Pfnf C P'un'aH. A ( A Ac,t« Png A !C P ,'e-r, C Pf'trjcn ®E Ck-C Oiv«< pe t>ar«M A Endisoh LM M PjMetty HaPan M Oicn ' n • :h Dear Mr. Gerhardson: Attached is Pay Request No. 1 for the Pumphouse No. 3 project. This pay request covers Richmar constructions bonding fee and stored materials purchased by Richmar Construction to date. Invoices have been attached for the items billed. We recommend the City pay for these items at this lime. If you have any questions, please call. ’i ours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & .ASSOCIATES, INC. Daryl Kirschenman DK:li End. WP/LTR3 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul Minnesota 55H3 • 61/-636-4600 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT DATE:November 7, 1990 FOR PERIOD: PLACE:Orono, Minnesota From: Aug. 1. 1990 PROJECT:Pumphouse No. 3 SPECIFIED CONTRACT PROJECT NO.: FILE NO.:13950 COMPLETION DATE: CONTRACTOR:Richmar Construction ADDRESS:7776 Alden Way Fridley. MN 55432 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 1 1990 SUMMARY: 1. Original Contract Amount 2. Change Order - ADDITION 3. Change Order - DEDUCTION 4. Revised Contract Amount 5. Value Completed to Date 6. Material on Hand 7. Amount Earned 8. Less Retainage 5 Z Sub-Total9. 10. 11. Less Amount Paid Previou';ly AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 211,34^.00 211.340.00 3.043.00 20.193.00 23.2: , . 30 1.161.80 22.074.20 0.00 22,074.20 Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC, By :_ _ _ OWNER APPROVAL: By_ _ _ _ _ _ _ By_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date:Approved By: -’^ICHMAR CONSTRUCTION Contractor By: 13950PR PROJECT:.PLACE:Puinhouse No. 30rono. Minnesota CONTRACTOR: Richmar Construction PA ;:ent no. :_ _ _ _1FILE NO.:_ _ _ _ _13950 DATE: November 7, 1990 tatement of work Contract Item Unit Uniu Est'd Quantity Amount Price Quantity To Date To Date BASE BID - PUMPHOUSE NO. 3 Construe' pumping facility for Welj. No. 3 incl. masonry structure, pumps, piping, chemical feed equipt., compressed air system, site work, electrical controls & cor»exated appurtenances L.S. Install 4" topsoil, jeed, fertilizer & mulch Acre $206,440.00 4,000.00 L S 0.5 1.5Z $3,043.00 TOTAL BASE BID WORK t3,043.00 ALTERNATE NO. 1 Substitute preformed wall & roof panels in lieu of wood shakes on the roansa- 1 roof as ADD or DEDUCT L S TO'AL ALTERNATE NO. 1 TOTAL BASE BID TOTAL ALTERNATE NO. 1 TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE $2,900.00 L S $3,043.00 0.00 $3,043.00 $0.00 STORED MATERIALS 1. Two 6* dia. hydropneumatic tanks t saddles ** jne 8" pump control valve ’^"•*TAL STORED MATERIALS Invoice attached Page 1 $17,543.00 2,650.00 $20,193.00 13950PR PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS CITY: PROJECT: FILE NO.: CONTRACTOR: Orono, Minnesota Pumphouse No. 3 13950 Rlchmar Construction ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $211,340.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS $0.00 REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT $211,340.00 DATE NO, 1 2 3 CHANGE ORDER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS - ADD $0.00 PROJECT PAYMENT SUMMAPV: PAYMENT PERIOD NO. FROM PAYMENT THIS VOUCHER VALUE COMPLETED RETAINAGE 8-1-90 10-31-90 $22.074.20 $3,043.00 $1,161.80 TOTAL PAYMENT TO DATE RETAINAGE FOR PAYMENT NO, TOTAL STORED MATERIALS TOTAL VALUE COMPLETED $22,074.20 1,161.80 -20,193.00 $3,043.00 13950PR i^T|l Bonestroo M=^ Rosene Anderlik & |\j I Associates Engineers & Architects November 5, 1990 Or.o G ScrfKroo. *’E ffcoen X >»E c »E S'C'a'C £ '..'f'f' P£ Z O P£ G»''n i Cco» *’E r"cvT.j5 t Noy^i P£ Bcoe^ G Scfurncnt PE Suun M Er^-'in C P^ A GcnJon PE PiCfaw %' Pcuff PE Dcna C Sorgafot. p£ A PE Var» A Hinior ?E >: a =-a PC Vc-ar ’ Paur".anr pc Poort p P*»PA»fi» pc Davo O Lojuou PE Tryyrvaj 'X ^erior P£ C Ly^*' PE P Vtawira. P£ «^rr,«n p AroeTcn PE Marc R Rorh. PE Potrerr C Suiir*. * I A *“orT-.aj £ Ar^i. P£ ‘^>A>a'T3 A Sar-Ayg p£ OacifTi J Edgeran ®E Marc A >-e p£ p^|*o J CaswM PE rirrac* Marconi ®E Marc D 'AS-tv cc T^omal R Anoervyi a i a Gary C (N-!arWf PE M't« 3 jeojco PE L ‘"’aMs Grav«< ill. PE »•" * “umart. AIA Ajrxfi M prrg A i C P ,e"v D 1 ‘trTZicf' ®E Cec .o C-v<a PE Crianfi A EncMon Leo M Paw^oty M Ojoo 7 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Mr. John Gerhardson Re: Well No. 3 Orono, MN Our FUe No. 13949 MOV 9 'v3'30 Dear Mr. Gerhardson: Attached is Pay Request No. 7 for Orono Well No. 3. This pay request covers work completed through November 1, 1990. If you have any questions, please call. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, AhiDERLIK ASSOCIATES, INC. Daryl Kirschenman DK jU End. WP/LTR3 ■A'- L.:.2335 yWtest Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT DATE:November 5. 1990 FOR PERIOD: PLACE:Orono, Minnesota From: Oct. 1, 1990 PROJECT:Municipal Well No. 3 16* Production Well SPECIFIED CONTRACT PROJECT NO.: FILE NO.:13949 COMPLETION DATE: CONTRACTOR:Keys Well Drilling Company June 15. 1990 ADDRESS:413 North Lexington Parkway St. Paul. MN 55104 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.:. SUMMARY: 1. Original Contract Amount Change Order - ADDITION Change Order - DEDUCTION Revised Contract Amount Value Completed to Date Material on Hand Amount Earned -.ess Retainage _ _'j_ _Z Sub-Total 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 31.475.00 Less Amount Paid Previously AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.:. 70,155.00 101.630.00 102.039.00 0.00 102.039.00 5.101.95 96^937.05 77,975.05 18.962.00 Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. * By; __ OWNER APPROVAL: By_ _ _ _ _ _ _ By_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date:Approved By; KEYS WELL DRILLING COMPANY Contractor By:. PR13949 PROJECT: Municipal Well No. 3 IS” Production Well PLACEt_ _ _ _Orono, Minnesota _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ CONTRACTOR: Keys Well Drllllne Company PAYMENT NO.: FILE NO.:13949 DATE:_November 5, 1990 STATEMENT OF WORK Contract Item Unit Unit Est'd Quantity Amount Price Quantity To Date To Date BASE Bin II - 16 INCH PRODUCTION WELL Item 1 Mobilization, transporting of materials fit equipment & setting up same for construction of 16" production well Item 2 Drill open hole into top of Limestoi,. to sew 16* production veil casing Item 3 Place 16* casing In open hole Item 4 Place neat cement grout in annulas around 16* production well casing Item 5 Drill 16* open hole through the Limestone and Jordan Item 6 Dynamite for blasting incl. labor for shooting, caps & wire Item 7 Bail Item 8 Furnish, install & remove air compression equlpt. for air surging of the well L.S. Item 9 Air surging of the well Mrs. Item 10 Furnish, install, & remove test pump for capacity test of well L.S. L.S. $6,000.00 L.F. L.F. C.Y. L.F. Lbs. C.Y. 35.00 32.00 200.00 25.00 2.00 40.00 1,000.00 100.00 2,500.00 L S 160 300 400 L S L S 0.5 $3,000.00 310 10,850.00 312 9,984.00 f 24 4,800.00 190 4.750.00 40 80.00 340 13,600.00 1 1,000.00 50.5 5,050.00 1 2,500.00 PR13949 Page 1 PROJECT: Municipal Well No. 3 16"Production Well PAYMENT NO.:7 PLACE: Orono. Minnesota FILE NO. :13949 CONTRACTOR: Keys Well Drilling Company DATE!November 5. 1990 STATEMENT OF WORK Unit Est'd Quantity Amount Contract Item Unit Price Quantity To Date To Date Item 11 Test pumping Hrs.90.00 100 166 14,940.00 Item 12 Televise completed well L.S.950.00 L S 1 950.00 Item 13 Sterilization of well upon completion, cleanup & weld cap on 16” casing L.S.1,000.00 L S TOTAL BASE BID II - 16” PRODUCTION WELL $71,504.00 CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 ; Item 1 Provide silt fence along Hwy 12 L.S.$975.00 L S 1 $975.00 CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 Item 1 Furnish & install air compression equipt L.S.$1,000.00 1 1 $1,000.00 Item 2 Surge & bail well Hour 100.00 180 199.75 19,975.00 Item 3 Install test pump L.S.2,500.00 1 .50 1,250.00 Item 4 Test pumping Hour 90.00 100 81.5 7,335.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 - ADD $29,560.00 PR139A9 Page 2 PROJECTt Municipal Veil No. 3 16* Production Veil PLACE:_ _ _ _Orono, Minnesota_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ CONTRACTOR: Keys Well Drilling Company PAYMENT NO.: FILE NO.:13949 DATE: November 5, 1990 STATEMENT OF WORK Contract Item Unit Unit Est'd Quantity Amount Price Quantity To Date To Date TOTAL BASE BID II - 16" PRODUCTION WELL TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 - ADD TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 - ADD TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE $71,504.00 975.00 29,560.00 $102,039.00 Page 3 PR13949 PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS CITY* Orono, Minnesota PROJECT: Municipal Well No. 3-16' Production Well FILE NO.: 13949 CONTRACTOR: Keys Well Drilling Company ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $70,155.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS $31,475.00 REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT $101,630.00 DATE NO. CHANGE ORDER DESCRIPTION 5-22-90 1 Provide silt fence for Hwy 12 9-10-90 2 Development work to increase capacity AMOUNT $975.00 30,500.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS - ADD $31,475.00 PROJECT PAYMENT SUMMARY: PAYMENT PERIOD PAYMENT VALUE NO.FROM TO THIS VOUCHER COMPLETED RETAINAGE 1 Start 3-30-90 $21,456.70 $13,850.00 $1,129.30 2 4-1-90 4-30-90 10,315.10 33,444.00 1.672.20 3 5-1-90 5-31-90 11,020.00 45,044.00 2,252.20 4 6-1-90 7-31-90 6,692.75 52,089.00 2,604.45 5 7-31-90 8-31-90 18,468.00 71,529.00 3,576.45 6 9-1-90 10-1-90 10,022.50 82,079.00 4,103.95 7 10-1-90 11-1-90 18.962.00 102,039.00 5,101.95 TOTAL PAYMENT TO DATE $96,937.05 RETAINAGE FOR PAYMENT NO. 7 5.101.95 TOTAL VALUE COMPLETED $102,039.00 PR13949 112090.3 /O TO: y.ayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrat(J'!^^\ DATE: November 20, 1990 SUBJECT: Woodhill Country Club Attachment: A. Woodhill Country Club Memo Dated 11/9/90 ISSUE - 1. Presentation to Council information raised at the last meeting including : Capacity of lift station MUSA status of Woodhill Club House Woodhill/Wayzata location Connection charges Precedent regarding allowing others to hook up 2. Determine Council direction on the matter. INTRODUCTION - At the Council's November 13, 1990 Council meeting Attachment A was presented for Council consideration. At that meeting several other issues were raised as outlined above. DISCUSSION - The following represent responses to date to those various issues. Capacity of Lift Station - Presently the capacity utilized at that lift station is about 60%. As such, given the peak gallonage of the Country Club would not present a problem for that lift station. Currently pumps in the lift station are 80 gallons per minute and even at a daily maximum of 11,000 gallons per day the Country Club usage would result in the pumps running approximately 2 hours longer per day. As for capacity in the interceptor, the interceptor capacity does not present a problem at this time. 2. MUSA Status of Club House - Since the entire City of Wayzata is fncluded In the MUSA line, the Country Club is already included in the MUSA. 3. Woodhill/Wayzata Location - The background as to when the Country Club wasTncorporated into Wayzata is somewhat uncertain, although it seems to predate maps done in 1963. The issue was that the Club had been a bottle club and wanted to get a regular liquor license, at the time Orono did not issue liquor licenses. As such an arrangement was made between Orono and Wayzata for the change. Staff continues to look for any documentation related to such an exchange. 4. Connection Charges - A. Amount - The City is currently exploring what number of units would be appropriate to this property. B. Give that the Country Club is constructing a rather extensive line from their Club House to a connection and uses only a small portion of the line and a lift station it may be more appropriate to only charge a use charge based on an established number of units. C. Precedence for other propert ies - The issue discussed was if allowing Woodhill to hook up creates a precedence in the following situations. 1. Properties which are in the rural zone that have not previously been part of a project. 2. Properties previously allowed to be hooked up who chose not to. but One way to differentiate this is the fact that it is in another City and that Orono has had properties such as the following that have connected into systems of other Cities: Wayzata - Herrick Circle, West Ferndale Road, Chevy Chase Long Lake #1 Rural Areas The properties that are in the rural area should not have a precendence because of this line because it is a property that currently is within the MUSA line and rural properties would require MUSA line extension the Comprehensive Plan amendment in order to permit. #2 Properties able to Participate As for the properties which previously had the ability to get into a project, but chose nCc <-u, it was indicat^'d that properties were told at that poind that they would never be able to join in the project. Council can therefore decide whether they would amend that policy to allow those to be included or chose to enforce the policy previously stated. To the^ best of staff's recollection however, none of those properties have brought such a request in the last 5 years (although they have inquired as to tlu- i/j^sibility in which staff encouraged them to explore) and those requests could be dealt with at that time. If they would have been permitted in the project originally it may be difficult to exclude them at this point. C. Use of Monies from Connect ion Monies - For properties allowing to previously existing assessment the City could do the following with those monies: a. Place in the sewer fund for capital replacement items in the future and thereby keep down the costs of longterm operations for all sewered properties. b. Designate the monies for specific repairs in this area. c. Determine a means to distribute those charges to all the properties that were in the district as a rebate. (It should be noted however, that not all the persons who paid the amount are the residents there at present.) ALTERNATIVES - 1. Accept the information. 2. Indicate any further issues. 3. Give staff direction as to further proceeding on this matter. 4. Indicate direction they desire in dealing with precedence. 5. Determine direction for use of the charges. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended after Council has considered these items that if it is appropriate staff be directed to work with the Country Club to determine if a connection charge is appropriate and that as it is a property in another city that the issue of precedence may only be applicable for the few properties previously excluded from the project. As for use of any connection charges at least from this connection that they be used for future operation maintenance costs. This would keep the overall maintenance for this sewered properties lower as these properties are no further ahead financially if Country Club doesn't connect that they would be if they did connect. Additionally it creates no negative impact on the system and the Country Club was never contemplated in the original as'^essment. A different story may be for those individual properties that could have gone on the project and thereby lower the original assessment, but chose not to. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, that the Council give direction to staff regarding whether they should proceed with working to develop sewer connection on this property. Ayes _, Nays _. cc: Woodhill Country Club, 200 Woodhill Road, Wayzata Mark Gronberg, Coffin & Gronberg Inc. TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administratol;;\i November 9, 1990 SUBJECT: Woodhill Country Club Attachment:A. City of Orono Ordinance Section 3.05/Subd. 10 B. Map of Area ISSUE - Determine issues Council may have regarding the request by Woodhill Country Club to hook up their club house to an Orono sewer line. INTRODUCTION - The Woodhill Country Club club house is located in Wayzata and is currently on a septic system and needs to develop an alternate septic system or hook to sewer. DISCUSSION - Under Section 3.05 Sub 10 (Attachment A) the City Administrator has the authority to allow hook up of sewer by a property in another community. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - As the club house itself is located in Wayzata it is probably included in the MUSA line and if so therefore a comprehensive plan amendment would not be needed. At the present there is no proposal to hook up other club house properties in Orono or the houses abutting the club house. These would require .. comp plan amendment. Cost - The system is proposed to be done at club house expense in a configuration outlined in Attachment B. Location - The entire line is on club property except for the last connection to the sewer on Russell using a gravity line. (The proposal has another option for this, which is on their own property using a -hort force main.) They would be responsible for obtaining easements. Maintenance - Although an 8" line (the size of our public lines) it would remain the property of the Club and they would be responsible for all maintenance and repair. (In the *uture should other properties be allowed by the City to connect, the City may djem it appropriate to take .)ver certain portions of the line.) Capacity - The proposed line would not present a capacity problem for our lift station or the interceptor (even if other properties were added.) Sewer Charges - The charges will be established based on the \JsaW in V manner done witS other non-residentxal properties. ALTERNATIVES 1. Indicate any concerns. 2. Table for further discussion. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that after Council has expressed issues or concerns that staff proceed accordingly. shall specify the amoant thereof, the description of the premises served, and the name of the owner thereof. The amount so certified shall be extended by the Auditor on the tax rolls against such premises in the same manner as other taxes, and collected by the County Treasurer, and paid to the City along with other taxes. Subd. 9. Damage to Municipal Utility Equipment. It is unlawful for any person to intentionally cause any damage to any municipal utility equipment or appurtenance, including, but not limited to, meters, street lights, water hydrants and curb cocks. Anyone causing such damage shall pay the reasonable value thereof to the City, including labor for renewal and installation of any equipment and shall be, in effect, an insurer of any equipment in his possession or with which he comes in contact. Subd. 10. Municipal Utility Service Outside the City. The City Administrator is hereby authorized to furnish municipal utility service to consumers outside the Ci y, provided, that such consumers specifically agree to all the t rms of the City Code, including, but not limited i-o, rules, regulations and rates adopted thereunder and the right to specially assess delinquent services, charges and penalties. Subd. 11. Separate Services. Each separate occupied property or each separate building or occupancy on a single property shall be served by and shall utilize a separate service connection not shared by any other property or occupancy, including each unit of any townhouse development, or each commercial occupancy under separate ownership. Exceptions: (1) duplex dwellings consisting of two residential units in one building, on one parcel of property, owned by one owner; or, (2) condominium, residential or commercial uses having more than one owner within the same building, where the land and/or common areas of the building including service areas are owned in common or by an association; or (3' apartment buildings or leasehold commercial buildings having on» wner but multiple tenants. SEC. 3.06. CERTIFICATION REQUIRED PRIOR TO TAPPING OR CONNECTION. Prior to issuance of a permit to tap or connect a lot or parcel of land with a municipal utility, the City shall issue a certificate of compliance with one of the Subdivisions of Section. Any certificate issued under this Subdivision shall provide that in the event of a subsequent assessment thereon for such utility, the amounc of the assessment hereunder shall be credited against the subsequent assessment. Subd. 1. The certificate shall state that such lot or parcel has been specially assessed for its share of the cost of construction of the sewer or water main, as the case may be, and that no installments thereof are delinquent or permit fees unpaid. ORONO CC (4-1-84) ppp IMU^ ¥. HU iUS) j\rr0<^^^ f/?() b SEU/E-a L/WE ;^o uT£- *000Mkt. *vc W0pj|UlLL "’ COUNTRY V R L S MO ■ » tl U II 0IGRO60N t L if-----*« CLUB n iMt • .aji* .a. :i Vt^mm mm 3FV« TPIVFV ■tiMipAV ^3$ m ■ * / < eomrmr 91UBr.: 111990.2 TO: J‘!ayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administratoi^' DATE: November 19, 1990 II SUBJECT: Councilmember Selection Process ^ Attachment: A. Draft Letter to Applicants B. Draft Request for Applicants Notice - Newspaper C. Orono Memo Dated 7/23/90 Regarding Advisory Board Selection ISSUE - 1. Receipt of information rejarding the application process for Councilmember selection. 2. Concurrence of Council with draft letter to be sent to applicants in advance of the interview. 3. Set date for interview. INTRODUCTION - As a result of Barbara Peterson's election as Mayor, the Council position will be required to be declared vacant following the effective date of the resignation. At the Council's November 13, 1990 meeting they directed staff to undertake the process of replacement. DISCUSSION - The City has prepared Attachment B for submission to the newspapers for publication and setting December 31, 1990 as the application date for the position. It is the intent that for all applicants the draft letter will be sent so that they may prepare, in advance, their response to those questions so the Council has a better idea as to their interest, background and outlook on significant items coming in front of the Council. At the November 13th meeting the general cor-rensus was that the process should be initiated early but perhaps that interviews be set for the 2nd meeting in January with possible appointment either at that meeting or a subsequent meeting. ALTERNATIVES 1. Acceptance of Information A. Accept B. Request additional information and/or action C. Table 2. Council Concurrence A. Concur with letter B. Amend and concur C. Table PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by ‘ f, seconded by that the Orono City Council acknowledge the information regarding the selection process and that the Council concur with the draft letter to be sent to all applicants in advance of the interview setting January 28, 1991 as the date for interviews. Ayes _, Nays _. 1119 9 C ^ IpLa W n ^TTM0^^f! Re; Interview for City Council Member Dear , As an individual who has expressed interest in the vacancy on the City Council created by the election of Barbara Peterson as Mayor, I would like to invite you to the Council's Monday, , 1991 meeting to be interviewed. The interview will consist of any introductory comments you may desire to make regarding yourself and your background in the position together with responses to the following questions. 1. What interests you in serving as a member of the Orono City Council? What attributes do you possess that would be of benefit to the City of Orono as a Counci Imember ? Attached is a copy of the Council's 1990-91 Goal Setting plus the City Administrator's 1991 Goal Setting. Please re^oond as to your thinking on the following items: - Highway 12 corridor development - Redevelopment in the Navarre area - Facilities needs - Lake Use and Management - Cooperation with other municipalities - Long term organizational planning - Council/Planning Commission responsibilities and relationship - Long term street and transportation planning 4. What areas do you feel are important for the Council to focus on for the rest of 1991 and for 1992. Due to the election of Barbara Peterson as Mayor, her Council position which was a 4 year terra starting January 1989 will be up for election November 1992. The appointee will fill the vacancy from date of appointment through the end of 1992. The indivudual appointed can file for election for an open position in November 1992. In addition to the election for this term, another four year Council position and the two year Mayoral term will be on the November 1992 ballot. Look forward to seeing you at about , 1991. P.M. on Monday, Sincerely, Mark E. Bernhardson City Administrator r - -1119 n^j 'c j- ORONO COUNCIL VACANCY ANNOUNCED With the election of Barbara Peterson as Mayor, a vacancy will be created on the Orono City Council effective upon her becoming Mayor. This position will be filled by appointment of the Council. All persons interested in applying for this position should submit a letter of intent together with a resume to the Council by December 31, 1990. This appointment term will expire Should you have any questions please call 473-7357. December 31, 1992. Mark Bernhardson at 5 i 1 ? 0 .. X CITY OF ORONO ADVISORY BOARD SELECTION PROCESS GUIDELINES TO STAFF ADOPTED 7/23/90 The following represents sn outline of s flexible appoint.nents process that the Council has adopted for guidelines to staff and applicants during the selection for vacancies of its various Boards. 1. When a vacancy occurs or when a terra is to expire adVertiseraents will be placed in the City's^ legal newspaper together with other appropriate notification of the irapending vacancies. Advertisements will not be required for appointraents of Chair and ^Uce Chair. 2. Notices will conta^ij^ a closing date for accepting applications for purposes of administrative ease. The Council by a majority vote can direct further solicitation of people. 3. Apolications should be in the form of a leti_er exoressing interest and a resume of experience^ particularly experience that may be relevant to the oosition from individuals who are new to the process. Letters of intent will be requested from incumbents. 4. Council may hold interviews at one Council meeting and may extend the interview period if it desires to a subsequent meeting unless a different process is indicated prior to such interviews. Failure or inability to attend an interview will not result in automatic disqualification. 5. Following the interviews Council will then decide what appointments they desire to make to the various vacancies . 111390.1 /%- ; • TOs Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato DATB: November 13, 1990 SUBJECT: Highway 12 Corridor Study Attachment;A. Highway 12 Corridor Study Memo Dated 11/2/90 (Memo Only) B. Highway 12 Corridor Memo Dated 9/5/90 C. Notice of Workshop D. Preliminary Agenda E. Policy Committee Meeting 10/24/90 Handouts (Includes Goals Update Dated 10/18/90) F. Highway 12 Corridor Task Force/Willmar 11/19/90 ISSUE 1. Present to Council information regarding scheduled upcoming workshop with: Background material Notice Agenda 2. Provide further input from consultants regarding the various routes and what improved alternatives there may be in each of those routes. INTRODUCTION - At Council's November 13, 1990 Council meeting they scheduled to have a workshop on the Highway 12 Corridor Study on December 1, 1990 at which time Council and staff would review progre.ss to date, a discussion of thoughts at this point and possible direction as the process goes forward. Together with providing feedback on the various corridors as requested by the Task Force. DISCUSSION - As indicated last time the City has received some of the mapping data, but it did not include wetlands, together with other significant features that the consultant is looking for the various cities through their input processes to provide. Once assembled the city would have all this data for Orono placed on one map. (On November 19, 1990 staff was able to obtain information on the wetlands.) As noted, the intent of the workshop is to review the corridor study progress to date, provide an opportunity for generating ideas regarding the further study together with reaction to the initially presented corridors. In line with this Attachment D represents a preliminary agenda for that meeting. staff is meeting with John Shardlow on Monday/ November 20, 1990 to review current corridors and determine if alternatives to those corridors could be developed more easily than ones presented. (Attachment F contains the updated Goals of the study plus generic study goals most often used in such studies. 0 represents oneSthat Orono had submitted, as outlined in Attachment B.) ALTERNATIVES 1. Accept the information. 2. Recommend any suggested changes. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that after the Council directs any changes they desire to be made, the staff prepare for the workshop on _ _ _ _ _ _ _. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by Council after making any amendments to the information direct staff to prepare for the workshop on December _, 1990. Ayes _, Nays _. L<2: John Shardlow, 300 First Avenue North, Suite 210, Mpls 55401 Citizen Committee Representatives 11190.3 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Adninistrator \J DATS: November 2, 1990 SUBJECT: Highway 12 Corridor Attachment: A. Highway 12 Corridor Study Letter Dated 10/30/90 ISSUE - 1. Present to Council the information regarding potential initial layouts. 2. Prepare reaction to those initial corridor located as to locations within the community. 3. Determine if it is an approrpiate time for a workshop to review issues and material with City Council/ Citizen Committee and interested community members and if so when. INTRODUCTION - At the meetings held in October the mapping "Attachment A was presented with the indication that it showed the .1 ’routes that initially people had talked about. The intent of the routes was not to limit the scoping study to this but as a point of discussion and that new routes and alternatives to these could be developed during the process. DISCUSSION - Corridor Information - As you will note three of the five major routes are partially or totally within Orono between the Wayzata border and the Maple Plain border. Over half of the current corridor is in Orono. Two of those three routes in Orono place it all in Orono, with Orono then sharing the burden of the entire relocation. Relocation substantially outside the current corridor will cause dislocation of existing land uses that are highly dependent and create pressure for new land uses which have not had a highway near them either in the short or longterm. Such a relocation will have deleterious effect on the commercial business that is highway dependent. At thi point, the level of review requested by the consultant is for each City to see what cheuiges could be made to each of these corridors by themselves to make it a more acceptable corridor to the community. These are currently being reviewed in light of the wetlands mapping, etc. ^ * An additional consideration, should a portion of the current route be used, is where traffic will go during construction and what provision will need to be made at some point for that. Issue #2 and #3 - Response to Mapping Data. Now that the process has reached a juncture for response to information on possible routes, it may be appropriate to hold a workshop to review information to date, get reaction to them and evaluate them in light of the City's initially established goals for corridor study. Possible options if a workshop is appropriate may be a Saturday morning in early December at a facility able to hold a significant number of people. If held, an article in the paper would be appropriate. ALTERNATIVES - 1. Provide additional input to staff to develop responses to these routes. 2. Accept the information. 3. Establish a workshop date. 4. Table for further discussion. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that Council, after giving any initial ideas and reactions, provide further information and reaction to staff in preparation for response to be presented together with requesting a possible extension for response from the consultant in order to allow a workshop in early December. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that Council after having discussed table the item until the November 26, 1990 Council meeting. Ayes __, Nays __. cc; John Shardlow John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director - I 'B TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato^^ DATE: September 5, 1990 SUBJECT: Highway 12 Corridor Study Attachment: A. Highway 12 Information B. Draft List of Issues ISSUE - 1. Presentation of information to Council from the Highway 12 Task Force. 2. List of draft issues for possible submission at the next Policy Committee meeting. 3. Proposal for utilization of outside expertise -o assist the City during the process. INTRODUCTION - Attachment A is the most recent: information presented to the Council regarding the Highway 12 Corridor Study. It had been requested that issues be prepared by the City for submission to the next Policy Committee meeting with Attachment A representing an initial list. discussion - Issue #2 - Draft Issues - This is initial list prepared by staff as to possible issues and objectives the City would like to have achieved during the study process. This does not mean necessarily that they could or would be achieved but at least would be the City's initial input on this. This initial submission does not forestall either the City or the Task Foi ce from developing other goals as the process progresses. Issue #3 - Expert Assistance - While initially looking at the utllTzation of a strictly transportation consultant the scope of the work appears to involve a wider range of issues as noted in the list of issues above. These issues are broader than transportation and include land use, environmental sensitive areas, urban and rural interface together with a transportation component. In order to blend both of these it would be perhaps better to utilize someone familiar with the land use issues and have a transportation expert available through them when it would be appropriate. Given this line of reasoning it is proposed that the City utilize John Shardlow as the principal expert in developing the issues and assisting the City in that matter and utilizing on an as needed basis a transportation engineering firm who has worded as part of MnDOT and as a contractor to MnLOT on significant projects. It should be menL.t..ied that during the review of the expert transportation people in the area who bring the kind of credentials that would be most valuable they are also the ones who work with the Minnesota Department of Transportation and their acting as a principle advocate for the City may put them in a difficult position with MnDOT in other areas. If however, they are in a background role providing technical expertise to an expert that may be a position that would most appropriate. Given the unknown initial scope of the work it is estimated that the City would work with a $5,000 budget and work to develop a work program in light of the current schedule presented by the consultant from that work projects for the transportation component would be determined. ALTERNATIVES - Issue #1 “ Accept the information. Issue #2 - 1. Make any comments on the proposal. 2. Adopt draft as initial submission. 3. Table for further discussion. 4. Schedule a workshop meeting on these issues. Issue #3 2 Expert Assistance 1. Engage Dahlgren Shardlow s Uban as the outside assistant and utilize a transportation consultant on an as needed basis 2. Engage separate land use and transportation consultants. 3. Select either a transportation or land use consultant 4. Table for further discussion. 5. Take no action. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the City work to develop with Dahlgren Shardlow & Uban a work program with an initial budget not to exceed $5,000. Any increase over this would be brought back for Council review and authorization. Once the work program has been developed it will be brought back to Council for their concurrence. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by s?'onded by Cour.*:: ■. 1 direct staff to work with Dahlgren Sh program for expertise on the Hi needed use a transportation sub exceed $5,000. A^es , Nays ' ow & uban regarding work / 12 Corridor together as .actor in an amount not to Members Present: Alternates Present: // TH 12 Corridor Study Policy Committee Minutes * July 25, 1990 Maple Plain City Hall Approved August 22, 1990 G. Welter. M. Johnson. A. Kunze, M. Alger. G. Acromite, D. Lorsung, R. Bauman. T. Humbert K. Gabnel, M. Bemhardson Others Present:S. Hay, L. Dallam, R. Harris, R. Scheuer. P. Swanson, A. Vande Vegte, G. Johnson S. Hay called the meeting to order shortly after 5:00 p.m. There were no changes made to the agenda. Hay discussed roles and membership of the three TH 12 Committees and their continued evolution. He also discussed an approach to conduct future meetings that would focus primary interaction with committee members sealed at the table, with input from their alternates seated in the audience. Others (citizens, technical committee members, etc.) attending the meeting would be able to have issues/concems addressed at the "Other Business" item of the agenda. Ensuing discussion: - Process to be used to ensure that compromises made by committee members w'ill be equitably treated? - Who has authority to select corridors? Hay stated that the purpose behind the scoping process was to narrow the range of possible corridors, from input by all project participants, to a manageable and feasible number. L. Dallam added that these feasible corridors would be addressed in an environmental impact statement (EIS), along with the issues, concerns and impacts identified in the scoping proce.ss. Dallam then presented the schedule of activities. He said it would be helpful if a preferred corridor was selected by July 1991 so that the corridor could be protected and uncertainty in the community removed. He said it would also be helpful to discuss the project with key people in each city -- and requested each member to mail or phone a list to him as soon as possible. Questions followed, addressed by Hay and Dallam: - G. Acromite asked wheiner the schedule of activities was for the Policy Committee or the entire study. Reply: Entire study. A. Kunze asked whose goals/issues/concerns would govern the process and how each would be rated to determine importance. Reply: Three segments may be individually studied to concentrate "micro-studies" within the project between neighboring communities:. All evaluation criteria would receive equal weight. The sooner the key individuals, issues, goals, and concerns are identified, the sooner the consultant can begin to evaluate. An informal list S'''these items was requested. Kunze asked about funding for the (preliminary engineering), who would proceed with EIS after HNTB completed the list of activities, and the State ’s priority fo' project. Reply: Hay explained the process for the project budget and that an ac ai funding request was made for the consultant to complete the EIS (to providt .inort-term supplemental staff), and that this project is Mn/DOT’s number two pnority in the Golden Valley office. Kunze also asked about estimated costs per mile of freeway vs. expressway and when costs (for the project’s construction) will be known. Reply: Project costs depend on the design, number of interchanges, grade separated crossings, frontage road ne etc., and that the freeway to expressway juncture, when known, will assist in ning costs. Acromite asked whether the Policy Com:nittee would have input in redetlning, as necessary, the 500 foot corridor width. Reply: If agreed upon, yes: but depends on issues and concerns identified in the scoping process. M. Johnson asked what the ordinary width of a freeway is (for future protection and preservation mapping purposes), and if frontage roads must be parallel to the corridor. Reply: A roadway may require 300 feet of width, depending on whether it is an expressway or freeway section, and that frontage roads are not necessarily parallel. Acromite asked for a clanfication between "comdor" and "nght-of-way", and whether Mn/DOT wanted formal documentation of goals, issues, and concerns from each representing jurisdiction for the next policy committee meeting. Reply: "Corridor" implies planning/search area, while "right-of-way" concerns land acquired for the actual operation of a roadway. No formal documentation of goals, issues, and concerns is necessary; but a list is needed for the consultant to stay on schedule, by the next meeting (or sooner). Other Business Hay opened the meeting for questions from the audience. - G. Johnson asked if the uncertainty on the design of the highway (expressway vs. freeway) means that Mn/DOT has ruled out the option of toll road financing. Reply: No. However, there has been no decision to study this option for the TH 12 project, and in all likelihood, it will not be studied. The primary focus is upon the selection of a corridor with minimal adverse impact on each city. - R. Scheuer discussed Commissioner Levine ’s 1989 announcement for a 1-year funding project and how it affects the current project schedule; requested an elaboration on obtaining funds for the consultant to complete the EIS; and asked about the impact to the project if mutual agreements are not possible between the participating junsdictions (at the end of the scoping process). Reply: The funds for the scoping project have been allocated. Even though contract execution took six months, a new schedule will not limit what will be accomplished in the study. T. Humbert explained how Mn/DOT obtains and uses funds to hire consultants. Hay slated that Mn/DOT seeks City Council approval on final design plans and geometries, and that if continued support for the project cannot be generated, it may choose to either by-pass the local governments involved (case of extreme need) or place the project on a lower priority, which would indefinitely jeopardize its completion. Humbert added that Mn/DOT does not want to waste expended scoping/EIS efforts, and therefore seeks to obtain as much cooperation from affected jurisdictions as possible throughout the study to ensure a project’s completion. Next Meeting August 22, 1990, 5:30 p.m.. Maple Plain City Hall (all Policy Committee meetings will be held the fourth Wednesday of each month). Meeting adjournment - 6:30 p.m. RDH/mst l4l7(VC«wnMii».7a TH 12 CORRIDOR COMMITTEES MAILING LIST AGENDA - MEETING NOTICES FOR ALL TH 12 CORRIDOR COMMITTEES (Technical, Policy and Citizen) TO BE SENT AT THE SAME TIME AS COMMITTEE MEMBER MAILINGS TO: City of Delano 205 Bridge Avenue East Delano, Minnesota 55328 City of Independence 1790 County Road 90 Independence, Minnesota 55359 City of Long Lake P. O. Box 606 Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 City of Oroii' Box 66 Ciystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Hamel, Minnesota 55340 City of Maple Plain Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359 Franklin Township c/o Norma Chadwici Route 1, Box 85 Delano, Minnesota 55328 ,,iiship Clerk |4n(VTHIXanHB.Ljt / 1 T.H. 12 CORRIDOR STUDY T.H. 101 - T.H. 25 X PROJECT G0.4LS/ISSUES/C0NCERNS ^ }A^/T^QT Goal 1.Accommodate through trips by auto and tmcks at a high le'jel of service along T.H. 12. I ■ Goal 2.Provide for the safe movement of vehicles along T.H. 12. Goals.Enhance the economic vitality of the State of Minnesota. i Goal 4.Preserve the quality of the natural environment along T.H. 12. Issues: •obtsining political consensus on preierred comdor •availability and source of funding for design and construction i •characteristics of new roadway (freeway vs. expressway) •access to T.H. 12 (type and spacing) Long Lake, !;Goal 5.Provide a high quality of life for Long Lake residents. r Concerns: ! • • impacts on local businesses and tax base, impacts on the natural environment (lakes, water quality, wetlands). Orono • Goal 6.Provide a high quality of life for Oronc residents. Concerns: * • w . k * • •impacts on residential property i—______•impacts on natural environment . --- I 1 #{safe, efficient movement of traffic D •impact*; on local businesses and tax base 1 if Medina Goal 7. Provide a high quality of life for Medina residents. Concerns: • impacts on adjacent properr/ (economic, access to T.H. 12, relocation costs, noise, visual) • mitigation of impacts on adjacent property • impact on local roads (cost to City of upgrading, relocation) • characteristics of upgraded T.H. 12 (freeway vs. e.xpressway) Maple Plain Goal 8. Provide a high quality of life for Maple Plain residents. Concerns: • impacts on local businesses (loss of highway traffic/sales if bv^assed -- quantity and convenience of access - adequate visibility and signing for the Civy.) • safe and expeditious movement of local traffic within the City • improved accessibility to Twin Cities Metropolitan .Area Independence Goal 9. Provide a high quality of life for Independence residents on large lots in a rural setting. Concerns: impacts-, on residential property local road continuity (upgraded T.H. 12 could be a barrier and divide the City) impact on CR 6 (in terms of existing conflict of through traffic with local traffic) impacts on Gty Hall (historic site) impact on "big woods" renmant community provisions in T.H. 12 R/W for future mass transit Delano Goal 10. Maintain a small-town-urban quality of life for Delano residents. Goal 11. Enhance the City of Delano as a semes center for surrounding areas. Concerns: • conflicts between local and through traffic on T.H. 12 (ability to cross T.K. 12 in peak periods) • impact on residential tax base • improved accessibility to Twin Cities Metropolitan Area • impacts on existing businesses and industrial development FUk 14171^1 t'OIVCofntac.iad 1MnDOT/HIGHWAY 12 STUDY INITIAL LIST/POTENTIAL GOALS FOR ORONO r-B Objectives for Process A.) Select a corridor that an be done without significant delays and provide a cost effective facility B.) At the point of 3-6 corridor options - have agencies take a tour (cities, MnDOT, DNR, EPA, Metropolitan Council, Fish/Wildlife, Corps of Engineers, etc.) C.) Serious consideration to the present corridors and variations close to it D.) Development of an Issues Map showing key physical issues (wetlands, cemeteries, etc.) E.) Determine if there is any cooperative activities with Burlington Northern to assist in ROW/Highway development Objectives for Corridor Selected Upgrade Highway 12 to a 4 lane capacity to safely handle anticipated traffic and improve the traffic level of service Preserve/protect significant natural amenities such as lakes, wetlands, Wolsfeld Woods, Luce Line, etc. Develop corridor that ties in and does not disrupt current transportation patterns and infrastructure Avoid severely isolating sections of the community from others Compatibility of alignment with appropriate land use - Minimize intrusion into area outside the MUSA line - Compliment land use and development plans - Limit the disruption caused to and impacts of traffic on single family residential areas - Provide approrpiate access in areas where development is desired Compatiabi1 ity with the Metropolitan Council Transportation framework as appropriate to the situation Use right-of-way acquisition to improve blighted areas Trade offs available for economic losses to communities where significant existing tax base is removed Minimize the increase in noise and ^r pollution ''evels in comparison to existing levels 11. iiTi n\ ^ Mi P P’ LT U HIGHWAY 12 COUNCIL WORKSHOP DECEMBER 1, 1990 9:00 A.M. ORONO HIGH SCHOOL CAFETERIA INTRODUCTION - City Council - Staff - Representatives HISTORY - 1950's - 1960's - 1985 - Highway 12 Land Use Corridor - 1988 CURRENT PROCESS Goals/Objectives - Studys - Orono*s Preliminary Corridors - Significant Features - Not Prefer Only Corridor Size NEXT STEPS Further Responses on Concerns Alternatives to Initial Corridors Next Community Workshop on Highway 12 TH 12 CORRIDOR STUDY TH 101 - TH 25 POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE Wednesday, October 24, 1990 Maple Plain City Hall 5:30 p.m. T AOEIVDA I. Call to Order II. Approval of Agenda III. Approval of September 26» 1990 Minutes IV. Selection of Policy Committee Chair V. Update on Technical, Citizen Committee Activities VI. City/State Goals, Project Issues/Concerns (Update) Vn. Discussion of Alternatives (L; 'uts) VIII. Discussion of Scoping Document — SEE Impacts IX. Other Business X. Comments from the Audience XI. Next Meeting XII. Adjournment SOCIAL. ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (FROM FHWA TECHNICAL ADVISORY - T6640.8A, OCTOBFJl 30, 1987) Listed below are potentially significam Social, Economic, and Environmental Impac;. m commonly encountered by highway projects. These impacts will be evaluated/or each ah - ” n v included in the EIS, if a potential for impact exists. 1« rand Use Imoacta Affect on current development trends and the State, Metro, and/or local government plans and policies on land and growth in the area(s) to be impacted. This would address provisions reflected n local comprehensive plans and the Metropolitan Council’s Metropolitan Development Guide — and include land use, transportation, public facilities, housing, community services, and other aieas, related to: plan consistency with project alternatives secondary SEE impacts that could be expected by the project alternatives (i.c. induced growth) 2. Farmiand Impacts • Affect on prime, unique, other than prime or unique farmland that is of statewideAffect on prime, unique, other man pnme or unique laiimauu umi importance, and, other than prime or unique farmland that is of local importance (i.c. farmlands covenanted in Agricultural Preserves in the seven-county Twin Cities metro area). .3. Tmnacts Changes in neighborhoods or neighborhood cohesion (either beneficial or adverse), such as dividing eighborhoods, isolating ethnic groups, gencraUng new development, changing properly values, or separating residents from community facilities. 0 • Changes in travel patterns or accessibility (vehicular, commuter, bicycle, or pedestrian). Impacts on school districts, recreation areas, churches, businesses, policc/firc protection, including dircct/indirect impacts resulting from the displacement of households and businesses. Impacts of alternatives on highway safely (and overall public safer/). -l- • General social groups especiaUy bcnefitted or harmed by the proposed project (i.c. elderly, handicapped/disabled, transit-dependent, minority and ethnic groups). 4, Relocation Impacts • Estimate of number of households to be displaced (and characteristics of household composition). • Available comparable housing in the area (dccc't, safe, and sanitary, including price ranges, sizes, and occupancy status (owner/tenant). • Special relocation considerations (known disabilities of relocatecs or groups). • Estimate of numbers, descriptions, types of occupancy (owner/tenant), and sizes (number of employees) of busincsses/farms to be displaced. • Available sites in the area for business relocation; the likelihood of relocation; and potential impacts on individual businesses uid farms caused by displacement or proximity of the proposed highway if not displaced. 5. Fcnnnm^^ ImnacLs • The economic impacts on the regional and/or local economy such as the effe''»s of the project alternative on development, tax revenues and publi; expenditures, employm t opportunities, accessibility, and retail sales. • The impacts on the economic vitality of existing highway-related businesses (e.g., gasoline stations, motels, etc.) and the resultant impact, if any, on the local economy. For example, the loss of busine.«s or employment resulting from building an alternative on new location bypassing a local community. • Impacts of the proposed action on established business districts, and ain opporronidcs to minimize or reduce such impacts by the public and/or private sectors. d. yiniKidefatloiia relatiny to Pedestrians and BicvcILsts 7. Air ftup^*^Y i**^p ***tx • Transportadon related air quality concerns in the project area and project-related carbon monoxide (CO) ir^pacts. s. Nfllsfi-Impacts • Noise sensitive areas (residences, businesses, schools, parks, etc.), including information -2- 0 0 on the number and types of activities which may be affected, including developed lands and undeveloped lands for which development is planned, designed, and programmed, and the extent of the impact (in decibels) of each noise-sensitive area in relation to federal noise criteria and Minnesota noise standards 9. Water pualttv Impacts • Ambient conditions of streams and water bodies which arc likely to be impacted, the potential impacts of each alternative and proposed mitigation measures. • Locations where roadway runoff or other nonpoint source pollution may have an adverse impact on sensitive water resources such as water supply reservoirs, ground water recharge areas, and high quality streams. 10. 11. 12. 13. Section 404, Section 10 Corps of Engineers for dredge/fill activity. Wetland Impacts Type, quality, function of affected wetlands; wctlano impacts; avoidance aliemativcs; and measures to minimize harm; short/long term effect on flood control capacity, shoreline anchorage potential, water pollution abatement capacity, and, fish and wildlife habitat value. Water Body v:irrr*m g|nd Wildlife Impacts Location and extent of water body modifications (e.g., impoundment, relocation, channel deeper'ng, filling, etc.); use of stream or body of water m i^.^^eation, water supply, or other purposes; impacts to fish and wildlife resulting from the loss degradation, or modification of aquatic or tenestrial habitat. plnni^plaln Tmnactit Flooding risks; Impacts on natural and beneficial floodplain values; Inducement of incompatible floodplain development (i.e., any development that is not consistent with a community's floodplain development plan); Measures to minimize floodplain impacts; and Measures to restore and preserve the natural and beneficial floodplain values. .1- environmental or visual values. 23.Trreveiirible and Irretrievable Commitments of Resources which would be IiivQlvecl in the Proposed Action 23. Natural, physical, human, and fiscal resources, ^fiction Rvaluatlon 1966 DOT Act, as amended, requires that all feasible and prudent alternatives be evaluated to the taking of any public recreation/natural lands and/or NRHP sites that warrant preservation in place [4(0]; and, land conversions such as parks, trails, or recreation facilities acquired or developed with Land and Water Conservation Funds (LAWCON), for which replacement lands of equal value must be obtained. [6(0]. U1^CHECLJJT»DH -5- L_ 1T.H. 12 CORRIDOR STUDY POLICY COMMITOiE Name & Title Appointment 1 Representing Mailing Address | 1 Telephone *erry Humbert ’reliminary Design Engr. Member Mn/DOT 2055 N. Lilac Drive Golden Valley, MN 55422 593-8516 jOrdon Wetter i4ayor Member Delano 320 Kelsey Street S. Delano, MN 55328 972-6232 yfichael Mathison [Council Member Alternate Delano 133 Oak Ridge Drive Delano, MN 55328 972-2981 )ob Bauman Supervisor Member Franklin Twp.Route 2, Box 415 Delano. MN 55328 972-3132 fohn Russek Alternate Franklin Twp.Route 3, Box 392 Delano, MN 55328 972-2396 tiarvin Johnson MUyor Member Independence 6325 Co. Rd. 6 Maple Plain, MN 55359 479*2773 ICay Gabriel l^undl Member Alternate Independence 3660 County Line Road Delano, MN 55328 972-2363 ^ Kunze Vfayor Member Long Lake P.O. Box 29 Long Lake, MN 55356 475-0505 Marion Alger Council Member Member Maple Plain 5735 Main Street West Maple Plain, MN 55359 479-1624 Bary Acromitc Council Member Member Medina 2482 Bobolink Koad Long Lake, MN 55356 541-2252 IVUfred Scherer Council Member Alternate Medina 2672 Willow Drive Hamel, MN 55340 473*7559 lames Grabek Mayor Member Orono City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 359*4000 Mark Bernhordson City Adminisuaior Allcrnatc Orono City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal B.iy, MN 55323 473-7357 T.H. 12 CORRIDOR STL'DY CITIZEN’S CO.VLMITTEE Name Appointment Representing Mailing Address Telephone teve Hay Member Mn/DOT :i055 N. Lilac Drive Golden Valiev, MN 55422 593-8533 ^ive Cade Member Delano Route 1 - Box 189B Howard Lake, MN 55349 479-3054 ^on Hamilton Member Delano 710 E. Babcock Boulevard Delano, MN 55328 972-3386 Gene Cook Member Independence 2389 Nelson Road Delano, MN 55328 972-6833 Cam Martin Member Independence 150 Co. Rd. 92 N. Maple Plain, MN 55359 479-1194 joiynn Bema Member Long Lake 58 Creeksidc Drive Long Lake, MN 55356 476-4869 Elizabeth Obon Member Long Lake 1825 Symes Street Long Lake, MN 55356 476-0321 Ralph Dayton Alternate Long Lake 50 Harrington Drive Long Lake, MN 55356 473-9019 Robin Hoseth Alternate Long Lake 34 Creeksidc Drive Long Lake, MN 55356 475-9 D1 Roger Koehnen ! Alternate Long Lake P.O. Box 207 Long Lake, MN 55356 473-4280 Ralph Gnitka Member Maple Plain 4834 Bradford Street Maple Plain, MN 55359 479-2795 Tammy Wcnz Member Maple Plain 1755 Baker Park Road Maple Plain, MN 55359 479-2362 Mardelle DeCamp Alternate Maple Plain 5435 Main Street West Maple Plain, MN 55359 479-2117 Kevin Worlonan Member Medina 2212 Chippewa Road Hamel MN 55340 478-9435 Ted Kulier Member Medina 2702 Parkview Drive Hamel MN 55340 475-2948 George Johnson Member OroDo 879 Brown Road North Long Lake, MN 55336 473-7301 Eleanor Winston Member Orono 765 Spring Hill Road Wayzata, MN 55391 473-7218 John Massopust Alternate OroDo 440 Brown Road .South Wayzata, MN 35391 336-9109 ritot t4iiD-iiakCWM.i« T.H. 12 CORRIDOR STUDY TECHNICAL COMMITTEE Name «Sc Title Appointment 1 Representing Mailing Address Telephone cvc Hay ’Oicct Manager Member Mn/DOT 2055 N. LUac Drive Golden Valiev, MN SS-iTZ 593*8535 al Becker tilities Superijitendent Member Delano 237 Buffalo Street Delano. MN 5532S 972*3211 Ian Brudua anning Consuilant Alternate Delano Northwest Associated Consultants 4601 Excelsior Blvd. Ste, 410 Minneapolis. MN 55416 925-9420 oiB Loucka ■nning COQSUltant Member Independence Loucks & Associates 8401 - 73rd Avenue North Brookivn Park, MN 55428 535-8937 aul Nesenson Alternate Independence Midwest Cedar Shakes Supply, Inc. 6000 Highway 12 Maple Plain, MN 479-3221 Urvin Wur2cr ttbUc Works Director Member Long Lake City HaU P.O. Box 606 Long Lake, MN 55356 473-6961 rio Vande Vegte 3iy Attorney Alternate Long I.ake City Hall P.O. Box 606 Long Lake, MN 55356 475-2219 etay Swartwood k)UAcil Member Alternate Long Lake 310 Russell Lane Long Lake. MN 55356 473*7317 ohn Sweeney louncil Member Member Maple Plain 5865 Three Oaks Dnvc Maple Plain, MN 55359 550-5072 im Dillman 'ubUc Works Director Member Medina City Hall 2052 County Road 24 Hamel, MN 55340 473-4643 Vllfred Scherer ^uncil Member Alternate Medina 2672 Willow Drive Hamel MN 55340 473-7559 ohn Gerhardson ^iblic Works Director Member Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7359 . Oiann Goenen ^undl Member Alternate Orono 1385 Fox Street Orono, MN 55391 473-6633 )ennis Hansen ^eC, Transp. Fianning Member Hennepin County Hennepin County Dept, of Public Works 320 Washington Avenue South Hopkins, MN 55343 930-2674 Tom Johnson rransporution Plamung Alternate Hennepin County Hennepin County Dept, of Public Works 320 Washington Avenue South Hopkins, MN 55343 930-2680 iVayne Fingalson bounty Engineer Member Wright County Wright County Dept, of Highways Route No. 1 - Box 97-B Buffalo. MN 55313 682-7388 Dave Montebello Ass'stant County Engineer Alternate Wright County Wright County Dept, of Highways Route No. 1 • Box 97-B Buffalo. MN 55313 J 682-7387 T.H. 12 CORRIDOR STUDY T.H. 101 - T.H. 25 CITY/STATE GO.U-S PROJECT ISSUES/CONCERNS (Revised 10-18-90) Coal 1. Accommodate through trips by auto and trucks at a high level of service along TH. 12. Coal 2. Provide for the safe movement of vehicles along T.H. 12. Coal 3, Enhance the economic vitality of the State of Minnesota. Coal 4. Preserve the quality of the natural environment along T.H. 12. Issues: • obtaining political consensus on preferred corridor • availability and source of funding for design and construction • characteristics of new roadway (freeway vs. expressway) • access to T.H. 12 (type and spacing) Metropolitan • compatibility of project with Metropolitan Council plans and poUcies • characteristics of upgraded T.H. 12 (freeway vs. expressway) • establishment and preservation of preferred corridor as soon as possible (in order for municipalities and townships to plan effectively and :o remove uncertainty of potentially affected property owners) Goal 5. Ensure the survival of Long Lake as an independent municipality and a viable economic and residential entity. Goal 6. Provide a high quality of life for Long Lake resident. Concerns: • impacts on local businesses • impacts on existing homes • Impact on tax base (existing T.I.F. commitments and the financial abUity to provide necessary public services) 1 • impacts on the namrai environment (lakes, woodlands, wetlands) • water quality of Long Lake • congestion on T.H. 12 Orono Goal 7. Provide a high quality of life for Orono residents. Concerns: • impacts on single family residential property • appropriate access to existing and planned development • noise and air qualiiW impacts • protection of natural enviromnem • safe, effective movement of vehicular traffic • impacts on local businesses and tax base • Safe and convenient movement along and across T.H. 12 for pedestrians and bicycles Medina Goal 8. Provide a high quality of life for Medina residents. Concerns; • impacts on adjacent property (economic, access to T.H. 12, relocation costs, noise, visual) • mitigation of impacts on adjacent property • impact on local roads (cost to City of upgrading, relocation) Maple Plain Goal 9. Provide a high quality of life for Maple Plain residents. Concerns; • impacts on local businesses (loss of highway traffic/sales if bypassed -- quantity and convenience of access - adequate visibility and signing for the City.) • safe and expeditious movement of local traffic within the City • improved accessibility to Twin Cities Metropolitan Area • local road continuity and access to T.H. 12 (upgraded T.H. 12 could be a barrier and divide the Gty) Indgpgndence Coal 10. Provide a high quality of life for Independence residents on large lots in a ntrai setting. Concerns: • impacts on residential property • local road continuity and access to T.H. 12 (upgraded T.H. 12 could be a barrier and divide the City) • impact on CR 6 (in terms of existing conflict of through traffic with local trafTic) • impacts on historic sites (e.g. City Hall) • impact on "big woods ” remnant communities • provisions in T.H. 12 R/W for future mass transit Delano Goal 11. Maintain a small-town-urban quality of life for Delano residents. Goal IZ Enhance the City of Delano as a service center for surrounding areas. Concerns; • conflicts between local and through traffic on T.H. 12 (ability to enter and cross 1 .H. 12 in peak periods) • impact on residential tax base • improved accessibility to Twin Qties Metropolitan Area • impacts on existing businesses and industrial development y^ranklin X^wnship Goal 13. Provide a good place pr harmonious living and farming. Goal 14. Accommodate growth in an orderly and economical manner. Concerns; • ability of township roads to accommodate growth after T.H. 12 is upgraded IHIshTB !• '_ i' V ^ 1-1 '1 t 1-ii_n v»AMMBN c a«naBNOOPEv Maoe oy C/<C Cf^ecKed or Date fOt 7-^ / Z Ja/TT^/T S/S ^ 'TfOA/S Sb CKC'i«C<*«‘3 C v Data jOD Nunr.oar Sh»«i \umDer ’C \4 Is* 1-5 J-Va tsj U4 to -o 5 \A I U 5> Q lu ifi U) V\;s << X V Ia U4 ' i •* V > t ? $ V 'Ji Ui I )< X £ •3t: § CC VI ’?r U) 5i «Si c N ^ 13 c 1^1 % ^ « lU V© cQ 5 V S >5’ 4J ^ 5 r S ^ «/ rAMO NBBOUas rAiv/iis<iEra A BCPicsEriOO^I" Mace cy J’/SyiS fOa-9/^^^V.^4JOt5 ‘‘^o /A/?£P ! C^pc^ecj by jOfc.e [Sheof Mo | For ^^/f/s ^ T /'I/A/aA /S a 4% y^/c /V^cV- 7^ //, ../Al£Ji/^ /yty£,As /nC/^<UiCA A^aJ/ 2^7^% ---- ^^/c/A/r-yyr^ /A/S /7 -^C/t^'^ y^>/^^/tits. t>^ JT^/^ /s- >«-W' 3yj,/it^^- .<>/". sAfi/v^ A^c. 7^/JpH^tyM yaAAi ^'^/7^^/ j''^'M.'Ai ^.j.. ^ :'x.^ X, A> "" '■'" 'rA/<S £:/>7/7Ay^ 7/p A7^ ///6/"A^^ /Oa//^ /7jfY4<s. /^///AnC ............////.-........ <s sy^ (xL-.g') ...go/rl...... &4%0.g/f) _ 3c /rS <?>/4A/M. ...jo.Yrs-_____ & 3% /xZ-^) ......... .__Jgao ZdiSiS._____...JZaa ... Z4a^ .....j4^o/>. ..J7Z0a ____.. 22Aa ____.^:.JZcfts ...4 7.A/P. ....... ......9oa^J/^Sno -.„/Z --^_/Y ..... .^/g/ee -_z/.^4^a —__/S /oo/ . /x^^.3oo z/y7£ia -_y.cc----------- >/ 7y>a ..... .igjiaa ____________._.. —-- - .----------- ------- .AAB... .——-—------- -. ------— •• - ..... - >. ...........IS,MO__.,3/',fioa .__ooe 39, ?^fo .. /e, fioo. {/ lAt.)^^^,.^/0--...Zif^//o'/...3‘i-,.ixeo ./3, 7ea ........ __________.... Ty^/c^/ . 7e>^c//7t, 2) : ^ - /A/^a ~ *7 7 —'y 4^/arft. 6Ay;rAit^aY ^ JjfffA/P - 4-/a^c aY^/7 a/ - ^ 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. # 20. 21. 22. Wild and Scenic Rivers • Potential adverse effects on the natural, cultural, and recreational values of such a listed or study river. Barriers and Coojtal Zone Impacts Areas prohibited for new or expanded facilities using federal funds, or with managed zones of a State Coastal Zone Management Program. Threatened or Endangered Species Proposed and listed species, and proposed and listed critical habitau. Historic and Archaeological Preservation Use of historic resources on or eligible for the National Register and to archaeological resources on or eligible for the National Register and which wanant preservation in place. HmEdflUS >> Mtg Sites Impacts on known or potential hazardous waste sites. Visual Impacts Relationship of the impacts to potential viewers of and from the project; impacts on existing visual resources, including the potential for visual quality impacts on design, art, and architecture. Energy Construction and operational energy requirements for all alternatives, including conservation potential. Cnnjrtruction Impacts Potential adverse impacts associated with construction (air quality, n ,e, water, traffic congestion, detours, safety, visual, e:c.). Tnint Dcveloomgnt Measures which would preserve or enhance an affected community’s social, economic, -4- 4: Highway 12 Corridor Task Force F 518 West Litchfield Avenue vVillmar. Minnesota 5G201 E: NOVH®ER 19, 1990 TOs TASK FORCE MEJEERS PICM; DEAN SCHLUTER SUBJECT; MEETING DATE A^rJ TEM’ATIVE .VhiZ DATE Vfe have sciieduled a meeting of the task force for Thursday Pece!Tt>er 6th at 7;00 p.m. The meeting will be held in Benson at the City Office building in the Council Chambers. The purpose of this December meeting will be to open up discussion with corridor concerns west of V<illmar to the South Dakota state line. We will jiisf> invite representatives from eastern South Dakota cities and the South Department of Transportation. *nie neeting is certainly open to the entire Task Force, however, I realise seme of you have been serving or are involved with the three Citizen Cannittees dealing with the Eastern Corridor recormendations, etc. I h..r-e kept a pulse on your activity through the agenda and minutes mailed to me. Thank you for all the time that ^^ly of you have dedicated to a tryina and difficult assignment. In meeting with Dave Eke>T Ana j^en Warr.er last Friday it was concluded that we tentatively scheduled a TasJc Force meeting, dealing with the progress of the three Citizen Committees early in Jaiiuary. Mr.Ekem ad’ised us that there shoui^'f he a report releasea oy the Transportation Study Board dur*ng Decentoer. ■niis {,'^port will be vital to our schedule of Task Force activit-/ i action for 1991. I woi.ild like to remind you agan' that it is crucial that Concerns to our indiviH^:a3 ^egislatores diiring weeks prior ’ i Sessicxi. Yes, and >rt«n t.-^ey convene they may call on us t^ liearings cttc. Finally it is my opinion t »ac we have uphold unity and liai w ..^h oui ’ Task Force to euzcomplish our mission. That is, t«. 'r>grade and build T.ri.l2 into a modem corridor that will ser the six coun_j.es temorrow and in the future. ■niank You. Be*"rion. look forward to meeting with you on Decentoer 6th in ] f !• r-' 111990.9 TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato^^^^ November 19, 1990 '. ■; i '• . i SDBJBCT: Strategic Planning - 1991 ISSUE - X. Present information to Coucil planning session during 1991. in advance of a strategic 2. Present to Council information regarding education and issue development f<^r new Councilmembers. INTRODUCTION - In the past as new CounciImembers are in the process of joining the Council background information regarding pertinent issues has been provided to these individuals. Given the anticipation of strategic planning to be done once the Council is fully assembled, combining the two seem to be an opportunity of which to take advantage of. DISCUSSION - The pupose of the strategic development and information would be to: 1, Present City. me. iternatives currently facing the 2. Provide the pertinent background information for all the CounciImembers. 3. Provide a means to allow the irdtvidual members to outline other issues and alternatives as feedback from the individual members to staff. 4. Provide a means for staff to review the issues initially with each Councilmen- r prior to full Council review. Issues and information would be includec .i a notebook for CounciImembers including those present CounciImembers who will be continuing. It is hoped that this will be completed by the end of November or the first week of December. ALTERNATIVES 1. Accept the information. 2. Make any comments CounciImembers feel appropriate. 3. Table for further discussion. /5 '1 RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that after any comments Council may have regarding this, indicate if this approach is an acceptable method for them. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by Council after making any comments gives its direction as to acceptabi1icy to this method of proceeding with Council education and issue development for strategic planning. Ayes __, Nays __. 4 111990.8 V TO: PSROM: DATS: Mayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator November 19, 1990 SUBJECT: Legal Action Notification ISSUE - Present for Council consideration notification of various legal actions in the City. IHTRODUCTION - At the Council's November 13, 1990 moeting the Issue o£ legal notification was discussed. It was indicated that if Council so desired that a process for that would be developed. DISCUSSION - The goals in development of such a process are as follows: A. Provide information when legal action is initiated against the City. B. Provide a means of information to Council that does not disrupt the City's contractural relations with the insurance company on all matters for which they are covered. (Violation of this can jeopardize the City's coverage.) C. Maintain appropriate. the attorney/client privilege In civil cases State Statutes provides that the individual who may initiate a suit is required within 6 months after discovery of loss to place the City of notice of a potential lawsuit. This notice serves only as a preservation of rights and the City may receive notice of such, although it may not eventually become a lawsuit. These are often as short ?s a paragraph outlining time, place and name of potential claima;**4t. Actual service on the City of a summons and complaint actually initiates that lawsuit. ALTERNATIVES Policy - Legal ::ction notification a. Civil lawsuits 1. Notice of claim 2. Lawsuit notification (Summons and Complaint) b. All legal actions including all criminal prosecutions. r: t; 2. Process a. Place as part of the agenda b. Provide copies of the legal notification directly *’ m ly ‘I- 'm to Council c. Utilize notification from the City Attorney to CounciImembers individually. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that given the interest as expressed to be that of initiation of lawsuits against the City that it only be done when the City has been served with a summons and complaint and that if denied appropriate by the Attorney the notificiation process be done through the City Attorney’s office individually addressing copies of those suits to counciImembers in order to retain appropriate attorney/client privilege in these matters. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by that the Council direct staff to notify it when notification of an actual civil lawsuit is received and that such be done to the counci Imembers through the City’s Attorney. Ayes __, Nays __. SECTION VI . LIABILITY COVERAGE CONDITIONS In addition to the Coram.^n Conditions, Liability Coverage Parts A, C, D. and E arc subject to the follow­ ing conditions: 1. LMCrrS DUTY TO DEFEND AND/OR INDEM­ NIFY a. Which constitutes malfeasance in office; or b. Which constitutes willful neglect of duty; ur & Which constitutes bad faith; or d. For which the ’city" is not authorized to indemnify any person by statute; or c. Which constitutes dishonesty on the part of a "covered party"; or f. Which constitutes the willful violation of a statute or ordinance by any official, employee, or agent ofthc’dty. The terms "malfeasance", "willful neglect of duty", and "bad faith" shall be given the same meaning in this covenant as given in the applicable statute with respect to the "dt/s" duty to defend or indemnify its oflidals, employees or agents. Z RNANOAL RESPONSIBILITY LAW When this covenant is certified as proof of financial responsibility for the future under the provisions of any motor vehide finandal responsibility law, such coverage as is afforded by this covenant for bodily in- jwy liability or totpnpeny damage liability shaU com­ ply with the provisions of such law to the extent of the coverage and limits of liability required by such law. 3. -COVERED PARTY’S" DUTIES IN THE EVENT OF OCCURRENCE, OAIM OR SUIT In the event of an ocauroKe, claim or suit notice coataiaing partioalan sufficient to identify the "covered party* and also reasonably obtainable in- formalioa with respect to the time, place and drcaButaaces tber^ and the names and ad- drrntf of the mjured and of available witnesses, shall be givea or for the "covered party* to LMCTT or any of its authorized agents as soon m praetkaUe. The *dty* shall promptly take at Its own eapease aU reasonable steps to prevent ^irionalhodify injury, pnpany damage, personal and errors or omisiions injiuy from arising damagf, pmonat iegury, and errors or omissions LMOT CMC (114S) (Rev. 1149) injury occ'irrcd; provided (1) that a failure to lake such prev taiivc measures shall not constitute a brccch of this condition unless LMCIT has re­ quested the "city" in writing to uriertakc such preventative measures, and (2) such expense shall not be recoverable under this covenanL 1. . - I. . ^ LMCrr*s duty to pay on behalf of or to indemnify a “covered party* other than the “aty* shall not apply to any act, error or omission: Notice of property damag^ bodily injury, personal injury, or errors or omissions injury is not notice of a claim. If claim is made or suit is brought against the "covered party", the "covered party" shall imme­ diately forward to the company every demand, notice, summons or other process received by him or his representative. The "covered party* shall cooperate with LMCIT and, upon LMCIT’s request, assist in making settlements, assist in the conduct of suits and as­ sist in enforcing any right of contribution or indemnity against any person or organization who may be liable to the 'covered party* because of boddy injury, ^ptrty damage, personal injury and errors or omissions injury with respect to which coverage is afforded under this covenant; and the "covered party* shall attend hearings and trials and a^l in securing and gening evidence and obtaining the attendance of witnesses. The "cov­ ered party" shall not, except at his own cost, voluntarily make any payment, assume any obligation or incur any expense other than for first aid to others at the time of accident. A cLiim by any person or organization seeking damages will be deemed to have been made when notice of such claim is received and recorded by any "covered party" or by LMCIT whichever comes first. All claims for damagtt as the result of an ocatr- rmce will be deemed to have been made at the time the first of those claims is made against any "covered party*. 4. EXTENDED REPORTING PERIOD LMCIT will provide one or more extended reporting periods, as described below if: Coverage A, C, or D is cancelled or not renewed; LMCIT renews or replaces Coverages A, C, or D with coverage that: (a)Has a retroactive date later than the date shown on the Declarations page; Does DOC apply to botUly injury, prop­ erty damage, persorutl injury, or errors page 12 of 13 111390.3 TOs Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrat DATE: November 13, 1990 SUBJECT: Septic Position • '.f Attachment:A. On Site Septic Inspector Position Memo Dated 9/5/90 ISSUE - Determine Council interest in the proposed position of an On Site Septic Inspector for the 1991 Budget. INTRODUCTION - At the Council's September 10, 1990 Council meeting they indicated a possible interest in the position that was included in the budget together with authorizing temporary extension of the position through the end of the year• DISCUSSION - At this juncture the individual currently in the position on a temporary basis would be interested in knowing whether he should be looking for an alternate job or if, in feet, he will be able to continue with the City in this position. (discussed at the Council's November 8, 1990 Budget Workshop there was no direct consensus from Council on this matter. Since the position is going to be a regular position it is appropriate to go through a regular application process. ALIERMATIRBS 1. Indicate Counc *' willingness to continue this position on a full time basis aj. ♦•lined in the budget. 2. Direct that applications be taken so that a decision for hiring can be done expeditiously. 3. Table until after budget consideration. 4. Direct the position not become a regular position. 5, Authorize extension of the temporary position until the appointment to a regular position is made. 6. Hire the current person without undertaking the employment process. 7. Take no action. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended if Council feels an upgrade in the program is appropriate that prior to the budget they direct that applications be taken and a recommendation be brought forward for regular appointment. Additionally authorize extension of the temporary position until a regular appointment iJ m2de? (This does not preclude hiring of the current temporary on a regular basis.) PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, Council direct Staff to convert the position of temporary septic inspector to one of full time commencing 1 January 1991. Direct that application be taken and a recommendation be brought forvrard for regular appointment. Additionally authorize extension of the temporary position until a regular appointment is made. (This does not preclude hiring of the current temporary on a regular basis.) Ayes _, Nays _. ? 5 ? 0.1 / / \K\^ TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator DATE: September 5, 1990 SUBJECT: On Site Septic Inspector Position Attachment; A. Mike Gaffron Memo on Orono's Septic System Management Program Dated 8/24/90 ISSUE - 1. Determine Council interest in the proposed position of an on­ site septic inspector. 2. Determination whether the current temporary position may be continued, INTRODUCTION - Over the past several years the City has used a summertime inspector to do the necessary septic inspections. In an average summer they have been able to do approj? ately 4-500 of the current 1,100 systems. While the program has functioned acceptably in conducting the inspections there is a concern as to the amount of follow up to ensure repair orders are accomplished to preserve systems is limited and that construction of new systems, particularly as septic sites become more difficult to develop on more marginal properties, will need to be strengthened. «'ince 1930 despite the sewering of selected areas in the community the overall number has grown from 860 to 1,100 with expected growth at current zoning standards to approximately 1,500 to 1,600. Additionally in that time the number of zoning reviews has increased from 70 in 1985 to 122 in 1989, a 75% increase. 1990 is expected to be over 140, a 100% increase. The City has not added any new positions since 1986 when one police officer was added to the base police contract and 1 and a half police officers to contract cities. This is the first addition of a full time person to the Building and Zoning staff since 1978 when there were two zoning personne 1, one who functioned primarily as the Village Planner and Administrative Assistant, one full time inspector and a septic manager person. In 1986 because of the increase in land use applications a realignment of duties resulted in the person who was also the septic manager doing ubstantial building and zoning, with the transformation a part time building inspector/maintenance person to full time inspector and some septic inspection work. Attachment A outlines the status of .the current program in addition work in other areas of building and zoning have not received the time and attention that they could including sewer area studies, comprehensive plan updates, lake and marina issues, zonin9 amendment updates, etc. freeing up current people to concentrate in other building and zoning areas. The proposed program cost and revenues are listed below. Zstimated Cost Conpensation (Level 6) Related Personnel Costs 1991 Top Step (1991 Rates)Revenue Estimate $24,700 $29,000 1990 $22,000 5,500 6,800 1991 $28,000 30,200 35,500 1992 $33,000 Current Cost/Sunroer Net Cost Increase 4,500 $^,700 - 4,500 $317000 lilcmMSSliKSss in 1980 which would generate about $28,000 in 1991 and increase to $30.00 which would generate about $33,0(30 at the current level in 1992. (the consumer price index during the 10 year period from 1980 to 1990 has increase over 60%.) In addition to the proposed fee being on par or belv^w that when it was initiated the new position would also provide increased service to those systems. It is estimated the cost of position for the final 3 months of the year is about $4,000 $4,500. ALTERNATIVES 1. Employ a person full time as a septic inspector lur the balance of the year. 2. Employ a person in the septic inspector position statting in 1991. 3. Extend the current temporary position through the end of the year given the budgetary timetable. 4. Table. 5. Conclude this temporary position when funds are depleted in the middle of October. RECOMMENDATION - It is recomir-nded that the continued through the end of the year with the person being able to update further inspections to the balance of the year pi necessary paper work and some follow up on repair for the last two to three years. In addition it is requested that the Council give comments as to their i’^^erest in establishing the position for 1991. As presented in tne budget, staff is recommending that the new position be created for 1991. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by the Council indicates their willingness to continue the program through the end of the year and will table the balance of the discussion until the budget discussions later this year. Ayes __, Nays __. u // To: From: Date: ■l~T/}Qiy/fiSlC/r ff Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator- -- - -^__ Michael 'Saffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator August 24, 1990 Subject: Review of Orono's Septic System Management Program Summary - 1. Since inception of Orono's Septic . stem Management Program in 1978, the number of staff hours devoted to the septic program has shown a general decline. 2. This has resulted in the following concerns: A) The number and frequency of existing system inspections has been inadaauate compared to the levels antici;. ated in the 1978 Septic Systems Ordinance. B) The level of effectiveness of Code requirement enforcement for new installations and repairs has been inconsistent due to the lack of a single inuividual over­ seeing tl j entire design/instal lation/muintenance process. C) Follow-up of system failures enc( ntered during the last 4 inspection seasons has been virtue 1/ non-existent. Records indicate approximately 70 of the 1,100 existing systems have experienced some degree of system failure that has not been repaired. Meanwhile, financing of municipal sewer"* ?? becoming nearly impossible without general taxpayer support, and the City is experiencing continuing development of highly constrained parcels of land. These two factors lead to the conclusion that a strong septic system management program is more critical than ever if the City intends to accomplish its Comprehensive Plan objective of not sewering the rural areciS of the City. 4. It is recommended that a full time septic program inspector/administrator be hired, as was done in 1978. Septic System Management Program August 24, 1990 Page 2 of 16 History of Orono's On-Site Sewage Treatment Inspection Program In the early 1970's, the City Council determined that the most effective way to preserve and enhance the water quality of Lake Minnetonka would be to limit the density of development within the watershed. They recognized that installation of municipal sewers has historically resulted In developer demands for smaller lot sizes for cost effectiveness. The Council therefore determined that municipal sev/ers would not be provided to the undeveloped rural areas of Orono and adopted 2-acre minimum lot size requirements for these unsewered areas, to provide adequate room for permanent use of septic systems, thereby avoiding (or at least postponing) high-density development . In February 1978, a full-time On-site Systems Inspection Program Manager was hired to review, inspect and approve all new septic system installations, inspect all existing septic systems on a regular basis, and create and administer septic system record keeping and homeowner education programs. A $20.00 per year program service charge was instituted in 1979, billed yearly to all septic system owners. Because many existing systems had never been documented as to design or location, it took 5 years to complete the initial round of system inspections, identifying and recording tank/drainf ield locations and following up on repairs. While the new on-site system ordinance adopted in 1978 anticipated inspection of each existing system at least once every 2 years, most systems were only inspected once within the first 5 year time period. Initial inspection efforts were also slowed by assignment of the inspector's time to related projects including documentation and follow-up on the Minnetonka Bluffs/West Ferndale sewer project. O 1Septic System Management Program August 24, 1990 Page 3 of 16 During inspection seasons 1981 through 1983, inspections of existing systems were done by Mike Gaffron on a part-time consultant basis, devoting approximately 750 hours per year to the program. In 1984, Lyle Oman performed summer inspections along with duties in the Building Inspection and Street Departments. In 1985, Lyle's duties in the Building Department increased and the number of existing system inspections decreased. For inspection seasons 1986, 1987 and 1988, a summer inspector was hired for the sole purpose of inspecting existing systems. The summer inspector in 1987 also assisted with some zoning applications; hence the inspections were somewhat less than years 1986 and 1988. In 1989, no summer inspector was hired and the remaining full-time staff were able to devote no significant time to inspecting existing systems. The only such inspections completed in 1989 resulted from requests by homeowners or realtors for refinancing or mortgage purposes. In June 199C a summer inspector was again hired for existing system inspections. It is expected that approximately 550 systems will be inspected in 1990. Review of new system plans and inspection of new installations has continued to be done by full time Building and Zoning Department staff, as has the review of site evaluations for proposed subdivisions. (2' Septic System Management Program August 24, 1990 Page 4 of 16 Intended Goals and Objectives of On-Site Program On On-site Sewage Treatment Code (Section 12.30) lists the following purposes: A) To provide minimum standards and criteria for the design, location, construction, use and maintenance of all o:-site sewage treatment systems within the City* b) To protect the land, water and other natural resources from pollution, impairment or destruction. C) To protect the public health, safety and general welfare of the residents and citizens of the City. D) To prevent the discharge of inadequately treated sewage to ground or surface waters. E) ,To prevent the flooding of or flood damage to operating systems. F) To prevent the premature extension of costly municipal sewer and water services consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Land Use Plan t^f the City. The Code goes on to provide for review, approval and inspection of all new septic system installations and repairs, as well as requiring proof of sewage treatment capabilities for all new rural lots created in the City. Additionally, while placing the responsibility for system operation, use and maintenance on each individual homeowner, the Code requires that "conforming systems shall be inspected by the City at least once every 2 years", and "substandard systems shall be inspected by the City at least once each year". City staff is given the authority to order system repairs or replacement where systems are found to be failing. Septic System Management Program August 24, 1990 Page 5 of 16 The Orono Comprehensive Land Use Management Plan is keyed toward preservation of Lake Minnetonka by allowing only low density development in the areas away from the Lake. To a great extent, the success of that Land Use Plan relies on the ability of the City to avoid installation of municipal sewers. The City's committment to protection and preservation of Orono's unique natural resources, coupled with land use, utility, and transportation policies geared toward low density development, all rely to a great degree on treatment and disposal of sewage on individual properties without the need for municipal sewers. If septic systems in rural Orono don't work, the City will be forced to install municipal sewers, which will ultimately lead to the higher density development which the City is attempting to avoid. Metropolitan Council Requirements The Metropolitan Council recently amended its guidelines for reviewing-'local comprehensive plans and plan amendments. Those guidelines require local controls including biennial inspection and maintenance of existing systems. While Orono's code would appear to generally meet the Metropolitan Council criteria, in actual practice the requirements of the code have not been effectively carried out. Perceived Problems with Current Program Status In order t^ provide a better perspective on the current status of the program, I would make the following comments. 1. Record keeping, requiring approximately 1 hour per new system (to assemble data to create inventory cards, mail out inspection reports, etc.) has been in a '*catch-up" mode for the last 5 years. Because of this, records have been lost in a few cases. Translation of information has often been inconsistent and less than thorough due to multiple staff member involvement in the plan approval/inspection/ record keeping process. V' Septic System Management Program August 24, 1990 Page 6 of 16 2. Regular existing system inspections have been sporadic and inconsistent from year to year. It takes 3-4 weeks of the typical 12 week inspection season for the temporary college students who have been hired to get "up to speed With a new person each year, the annual inspection process barely gets started before it ends. The summer interns certainly can't become septic experts in the short time available, hence the quality and consistency of verbal information given to homeowners is lacking. Availability of full time staff to train new interns is also limited, since the beginning of the inspection season (June) coincides with the normal peak of the construction season. 3. Due to the need for tactful homeowner contact throughout the entire system repair process when such work is needed, summer inspectors have not been asked to do the foZ lov-up work for needed repairs. Homeowners expect to deal w^th a knowledgeable staff person who can provide consistent and reliable answers throughout the repair process. As a result, many repairs have not been followed up because no individual full time staff person has had the time available to do so. Currently, Orono has a number of systems which were found to be failing as long ago as 1984, but which have never been followed up. With neither the homeowner anxious to spend significant amounts of money nor the neighbors making any complaints, such follow-ups must ultimately rely on staff members to push for any repair activity to occur. 4. There is a disparity between the kind of protection that residents expect based upon the tenets of the septic ordinance and the actual ability of a limited staff to provide the degree of service expected; ( ; Septic System Management Program August 24, 1990 Page 7 of 16 a) Residents expect soil testing/system design that meets City Code standards. Although not strictly a factor that can be changed by the City, there is a distinct lack of qualified and competent site evaluators. There are currently just a few site evaluators in the area whose work has been consistently of high quality. At least 3 or 4 other good ones have left the business within the last 5 years (Gary Rathbun of Hakanson, Anderson Asssociates; Tom Smith; Dave Ross from Schoell & Madson). There are an additional 3 or 4 who have exhibited poor methodology, poor reporting, or outright incompetence including actual deceitful practices (i.e. submitting reports for work that was never done, and completely ignoring obvious soil/site factors in order to allow a trench system where one shouldn't have been). /The point of this is that an incompetent site evaluator -takes up significant amounts of staff time and investigative effort. We have been fortunate in being able to steer developers away from some of the worst offenders, but we can't totally eliminate them from the business, hence when they show up we have no choice but to devote the necessary time and effort to closely monitor their work. b) Residents expect installations that meet City Code. Installers generally have become much more skilled, experienced and competent since 1978, in part due to good training programs at the State level. However, the State voluntary certification program currently has no "teeth", and a lot of less-than-competent installers have managed to obtain State Certification while there is currently no mechanism for revocation of same. Septic System Management Program August 24, 1990 Page 8 of 16 In the case where an installer commits errors, there are some mistakes that can't be rectified, hence a strong septic program must have as a goal, to work with installers every step of the way, requiring pre ­ construction meetings on the site, inspections at each stage of construction (without relying only on the contractor to call for inspections), and providing a level of inspection service to the residents that our Comprehensive Plan goals demand. This service cannot be adequately provided by part-time temporary staff nor by full time staff devoted primarily to duties other than the septic program. c) Residents expect record keeping that is up to date, cleax, accurate, consistent SLod readily available- As noted before, our record keeping is in arrears, and with a new inspector each year, accuracy is suspect ’while consistent interpretation of system conditions . and site capabilities is lacking. Record availability is at least good, but the card file system is becoming outmoded and unwieldy. Compute "ization of these records would be a long-term goal. d) Residents expect existing system inspections on a regular basis, a consistent staff person each time the system is inspected, a year—to—year redundancy that provides at least a minimal comfort level that the system has been "OK'd" and isn't causing any discernible pollution or health problems. Regular inspections by the same person each time will result in a better analysis of changing system conditions through the years. Our inspections have been irregularly spaced at best. With a stated goal of visiting each system at least once every 2 years, we have failed to come even close. In the 12 inspection seasons since the program started, a majority of pre­ existing systems have been inspected 3 times, many 4 times but few more than 5 times.(J Septic System Management Program August 24, 1990 Page 9 of 16 The only way we can currently legitimately claim to be "catching problems before they occur" is by relying on the homeowner to read and heed the information flyer that is mailed with the yearly billing, and by keeping in close contact with pumpers as to actual conditions of systems they encounter. However, 3 inspections in 12 years is not nearly often enough to preempt problems in a given system. Annual or biennial inspections might catch problems early, but once every 3-4 years is doubtful. And, many times problems are not "catchable" before they occur, but may be related to abruptly changed water use habits, seasonal water table conditions, or any number of other unknown and uncontrollable variables. Also, a full-time inspector who is constantly updating the septic cards as pumping information arrives, will see patterns occuring and investigate the problems before they worsen. Code Update is Needed Orono's Septic Code was adopted in 1978, slightly pre-dating the MPCA's adoption of recommended regulations for local sewage treatment ordinances. Orono staff worked closely with University and MPCA representatives to ensure that Orono's code would be similar to the proposed MPCA regulations, which became known as WPC-40. Through the last 10 years, the MPCA, University Extension Service staff, and the MPCA's Individual Sewage Treatment Systems Advisory Committee, have worked to refine the codes and update them on a regular basis. WPC-40 has been redesignated as Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080, Individual Sewage Treatment Systems Standards. r::‘i Septic System Management Program August 24, 1990 Page 10 of 16 These rules underwent a major revision in 1989, for which Mike Gaffron attended and testified at an administrative hearing in St. Paul regarding certain elements of those revisions, specifically on the issue of allowing mounds on steep slopes. This effort was partially successful in that the MPCA revised their rules to require a 25% increase in absorption area for mounds located on slopes exceeding 12%. The research used by the PCA to justify mounds on steep slopes was based on a narrow range of soil types, and it is arguable that the research basis for allowing mounds on stet;p slopes was lacking. Orono's current septic code was last revised in 1979, and underwent no significant changes during the 1984 municipal code recodification. A number of design criteria changes for mound systems have occurred in the last 10 years, and, although staff has in every respect required designers and installers to meet the minimum standards of Chaptr * 7080 as those changes occurred, none of those revisions were ever formally adopted by the City of Orono. The specific design criteria referred to, would mainxy require major amendments to Orono Resolution #894, which is the document known as the City of Orono On-Site Sewage Treatment System Design Manual. Chapter 12 of the Municipal Code contains Orono's septic system ordinances, which generally define the goals and objectives of the septic program, define specific terminologies, provide generally that sewage treatment is required, that where sewer is available it must be used, that standards systems are generally required, provides a procedure for variances, and requires septic system analysis for building permits and subdivision applic^^--*'nns. The ordinance adopts by reference the Design Manual (Resolution #894) and izs .2'^endment (Resolution #983), and goes on to require site evaluations, system designs, and inspection of both new and existing systems. This code provides special consideration for properties on Minnetonka Islands, and contains provisions for administration and ^fcforcement, while also authorizing the annual service charge. ('J r..-: o Septic System Management Program August 24f 1990 Page 11 of 16 Only minor changes will have to be made to the actual ordinance, which is Section 12.30 of the Municipal Code. Major changes will have to be made in the Design Manual, Resolution #894. These are long overdue and staff has been discussing them for at least 3 years now. Data This section is intended to provide a number of tables, graphs, and lists, indicating levels of activity in the various facets of the septic system management program over the years. These exhibits appear as follows: A - Number of existing systems and approximate program fees received 1978-1989. B - Staff hours devoted to septic program (includes full ­ time and part-time staff), 1978-1989. C -Staff hours devoted vs. number of existing system inspections. D - New system permits issued 1975-1989. E - Repair permits issued 1975-1989, related to numbers of failing systems encountered. F — Number of repair permits issued related to staff hours 1978-1989. G - Number of reported pump-ou's vs. number of existing system inspections. . .. Septic System Management Program August 24, 1990 Page 12 of 16 Exhibit A indicates the number of existing septic systems in use in Orono each year since 1978. Note that the septic program was funded by a federal grant in 1978, and the first service charge billing occurred in 1979 in the amount of $20.00 per system. That fee increased to $25.00 in 1980 but was reverted back to $20.00 in 1981 and has remained at $20.00 ever since. The number of systems being billed on a yearly basis has increased at a slower rate than the number of new rural homes constructed, due to new connections to City sewers which have been constructed in the last 10-15 years. Note for the record that program fee income has been lumped into the general Building & Zoning budget each year, and has never been devoted strictly to the septic program. This policy should be reviewed. Exhibit B indicates staff hours devoted to the septic program each year, including full-time and part-time staff hours. The bar diagram indicates two distinct facts: - Total staff hours devoted to the septic program have generally decreased since the beginning of the program; and - In the years 1984 through 1989 where staff time sheets show a distinction between administration time and inspection time, the hours devoted to program administration have declined to a level of 3-4 hours per week. Exhibit C indicates staff time spent on the overall septic pr.^grcun vs. the number of existing system inspections completed. The number of inspections in the first three years was relatively low due to the need to locate lost systems and create septic cards, etc. Since then, the years with the higher number of existing system inspections occur mainly ii those years in which a part-time inspector devoted his or her efforts exclusively to the septic program without other responsibilities. (D Septic System Management Program August 24, 1990 Page 13 of 16 Exhibit D i„idicates the number of septic system permits issued for construction of new residences each year since 1975. A moratorium was in effect for parts of 1974 and 1975 with an increase in new construction activity in the latter half of the 1970s. New home starts were relatively low in 1980 through 1983, then increased dramatically in 1984 and remained relatively high through 1989. Exhibit E indicates the relationships between the number of septic system repair permits issued, the number of failed systems encountered, and the number of system inspections made. Predictably, repair permits were at a high level during the first 5 years of the septic program (1978-1982), due not only to a significant number of failing systems encountered during the initial inspections, but often due to individual property owners initiative and heightened concern and awareness in the City generally about septic -/stems. Repair permits droppt, significantly in 1983, partially due to a new»requirement for soil testing for repair work. Ls became policy because prior to that time, staff encountered a number of repairs which did not yield functional systems due to poor design based on lack of soil information. Note also that the number of repairs from 1983 through 1989 was low relative to the first 5 years, even though in 1987-1989 many existing system inspections were made. Since the level of system failures encountered has ranged from 5-10% of the systems inspected in any given year, it is likely that relatively low numbers of repair permits during years of numerous existing system inspections, indicates a lack of repair order compliance rather than a lack of failing systems. In the period 1986 through 1988, while 79 systems were found to be failing, only 61 were repaired. This indicates an overall compliance rate of 77% for those years, meaning one-fourth of the failing systems weren’t repaired. This recent lack of compliance appears to be somewhat directly related to the decreasing amount of program administration and follow-up hours, illustrated in Exhibit F. ‘A Septic System Management Program August 24, 1990 Page 14 of 16 Exhibit G illustrates the number of pump-outs reported by pump-out contractors versus the number of existing system inspections. The number of reported pump-outs generally is higher when many inspections are being done. This is predictable. An interesting fact to note is that in no year were more than one-fifth of the existing systems pumped out. The average yearly number of pump-outs since 1978 is 125, or approximately 1 system in 8. This indi -ates that the typical system is pumped out once every 8 years rather than once every 3 years, as the code requires. This again can be related partially to the low rate of existing system inspections, as well as to ^-he lack of staff time devoted to education of the public rec'^rding the need to pump septic systems. Analysis Some general conclusions can be reached by analyzing the above charts and graphs. First, while the septic system program fee has not increased since 1980, total income to the City from the annual program service charge billing has increased at an average rate of 1.5% per year since 1979, equivalent to the race of increase of homes in the City which use septic systems. At the same time, staff hours devoted to the septic system program have generally decreased to less than half the hours devoted at the beginning of the program. Staff hours were at a high of 1600 hours in 1978, d'^opping to a low of 295 hours in 1989. The degree of septic system maintenance (pumpout) activity in the City tends to vary directly with the level of existing system inspections. However, the number of existing system repairs completed appears to relate more directly to the actual number of staff hours devoted, rather than to the degree of existing system inspections. Clearly, the presence of a summer inspector results in residents maintaining their septic systems, but system repair order compliance tends to increase significantly during times of aggressive followup efforts. L Septic System Management Program August 24, 1990 Page 15 of 16 Septic Systems as "Second Fiddle" Most developers and many residents of Orono believe that septic systems are a "second class citizen", and that ultimately the City"of Orono will be sewered. There are certainly a number of people who take the opposite view, that the City's stated intent to "never sewer rural Orono", is a realistic, viable goal. Given the tenor of the courts in limiting special assessments to the equivalent increases in property value, it seems unlikely that city sewers will run rampanc through our hills and valleys for many years to come. Developers and home owners tend to place septic systems low on a list of priorities, hence other factors in development of a property are often given precedence. This often results in less than perfect conditions for designing/locating/constructing septic systems, and in probably 1/3 of the residential construction projects, the need for a strong presence by City staff is critical in ensuring that septic needs are properly met. The amount of staff time required to "ride herd" on a project from beginning to completion, has generally'exceeded that available, ever since the point at which the City no longer had a staff person devoted full time to the septic program. Conclusions 1.Not enough time is being spent on followups to make sure all failing systems get repaired. 2.Residents are not receiving the level of existing system inspections that was originally anticipated and which is required in order to limit the incidence of failed systems. 3.Septic system plan review, construction, inspection, and followup documentation is receiving fragmented attention from multiple staff members, with no one person comprehensively overseeing the entire process. This leads to a much higher potential that something can go wrong. 4.Record keeping has been inadequate due to a lack of staff time devoted to same. Septic System Management Program August 24, 1990 Page 16 of 16 5.Installation of municipal sewers remains a high cost alternative with environmental ramifications perceived by the City to be more detrimental than those associated with septic systems. Therefore, it is in the City's best interest to make the strongest effort possible towards the successful long-term use of septic systems. j Recommendation Based on the above conclusions, staff recommends that a septic system program manager be hired, to provide a comprehensive direction and oversight of all phases of septic system design, location, construction, use and maintenance. This position would be responsible for all facets of the program, including subdivision septic review, new system plan review and approval, inspection of new system construction, inspection of existing systems, followup on all necessary repair work, updating of codes as necessary, and public education regarding septic systems. This would be intended as a full time permanent position within the Building & Zoning Department. o - ^X/+/'2>IT5 - SjSF^TIC ’ tS^ Exhibit A J Annual Program Fees Collected Year Number of Existing Systems (Approx.)Annual Fee Per System 1978 950 (Est.)(Not Charged) 1979 950 (Est.)$ 19,000 $ 20 1980 960 (Est.)24,000 25 1981 970 (Est.)19,400 20 1982 980 (Est.)19,600 20 1983 990 19,800 2 1984 1006 20,120 20 1985 1040 20,800 20 1986 i-C69 21,380 20 1987 1062 21,240 20 1988 1075 21,50u 20 1989 1102 22,040 20 1990 1143 22,860 20 $251,740 I--’ o« 2000 - 1500 - 1000 500 EXHIBIT B : STAFF HOURS DEVOTED TO SEPTIC PROGRAM Split bar shows: ! ; Lower # - Septic administration Higher # - Septic Inspections Solid bar: No distinction between insp. and admin, hours on timesheet logs • Total person-hours 1978-1989; 10,690 hours 76 *77 *78 *79 *80 '81 '82 '83 '84 YEAR 86 '87 *88 Exhibit E 1Septic System Repair Permits vs. I of ’Needed Repairs’ Encountered Year 1 of Systems Inspected As A % Of All Systems I Found to Be In Need Of Repairs As A % Of Those Inspected ^ Repair Permits Issued Number Of Actual Permits As A % Of Those Inspected As Of To A % Those Found Be Failing 1975 ———3 —— 1976 ————10 —— 1977 ————9 —— 1978 210 *'2%12 5.7%35 16.7%292% 1979 154 16%15 9.7%26 16.9%173% 1980 158 16%*29 18.4%— 1981 387 40%*24 6.2%— 1982 381 39%*35 9.2%— 1983 112 11%*14 12.5%— 1984 286 28%*21 7.3%— 1985 129 12%*18 14.0%— 1986 592 55%36 6.1%19 3.2%53% 1987 306 29%19 6.2%26 8.5%137% 1988 449 42%24 5.3%16 3.6%67% 1989 45 4% *12 27.0%— • Failing systems were tracked on ongoing basis rather than yearly L,. :Vi‘: . ;r. rv-l -r - . ^... I i ?. i: :ii i l: 5 5 I il ' u. i ■n;r: i-44{-•vn. -it._iit^ -it Izp -.-..75 |. . . 'i ■ i ‘ ;vr. ..............V . I;; j;:i. -t•■•I i : ; I.j . r 'i :4.i1 1 1.- '1 ’ ' 11 1 1 1 1 £)<Hie.rr ^ I Vs . STAFF TO ! <"61 B’i W ^ houi/L e^TTiv^rg /. / /A>s/>^crroAJ '/uu^er: I. . -■-' -!...:r:\(\./: -• 1 11 •; X r;■-- ...i ■j ' ' i !11 *• ---—— II 2.1 ^ “ " •' i f:>) ■h-j ■• • Cl fS-OO' -poo -SCO i ■ t Zy :•: .?. J 112090.4 t .'"v TO: FHOM: DATE: Mayor and ncil Mark E. Bernhar^son, City Administrate November 20, 1990 ■■ ■•■.2: i V fi' SUBJECT: 1991 Fee Ordinance Attachments: A. Proposed 1991 Fee Ordinance B. Proposed Summary Ordinance ISSUE 1. Presentation of fee ordinance changes for 1991. 2. Adoption of fee ordinance for 1991. 3. Adoption of summary ordinance for publication. INTRODUCTION - Annually the Council adopts the fee ordinance for the coming year. ALTERNATIVES 1. Adopt the Ordinance amendment and the summary. 2. Amend and adopt. 3. Table for further discussion. 4. Leave the 1990 rates in force for 1991 by amending the current ordinance extending them to 1991. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that teh Council accept Attachment A as the fees for 1991 and Attachment B as the Summary Ordinance for Pulbication and after any questions table to the Decmeber 10, 1990 Council meeting. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, that the Orono City Council table further consideration until the December 10, 1990 Council meeting. Ayes _, Nays _. ■ /N c^7 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJ: Mayor and City Council M.rk E. Bernhardson, City Adminittrato -:^eg»mtrirT —1^89^ Fee Ordinance mi Attachment*I MlA. Proposed Fee Ordinance B. Proposed Summary Ordinance COUNCIL MEETING 0EC1H939 cfr/ OF omo IH2i 1. -KSBp Mt-o( fee ordinance - irti coming year. nracBSSIOH -The changes g^ral reflect the'T^^^eas^cost of providing.the service generally-4n^he 4-5% range. Alternatives 1. Adopt the ordinance amendment and the summary 2. Amend and adopt. 3. Table for further discussion ,cr-f| 4. Leave the-^ rates in force for by ^mending the current ordinance extending them to 1«0. — recommendation - It is recommended that the Council :hm.nt » as the fees for 1990 and Attachment B as the Sw -.jary Ordinance for Publication. - I -V if io - /■ T-ui ' j ‘0 IV Cy<r. PROPOSED MOTION -Moved by_ _,Seconded byri\wrw«9ae^ t .w - - — - —- City Council Adopfe -Osd-inance NO ----- -Ever bcheduie repealing Oi.dinancQ Nu»i>e-r set^les adoptr“Attachmnet “S '..y-\ uC-* u - Y" Ithat the Orono Sernn*i^^ ^-of Llm S-etund Publication. Ay^’^^ZZT' C tw —' - as Llie sumBra“ry"OiJinano« DIRECTORY FOR 1991 FEE SQIEIXJIJE OapY Charges Page Administraticn. . . . .. . .20 Accident Reports. . . . . ..23 Building Plan Copies . . . . .20 Copy Microfiche File - PD. . .23 Copy Service - Police Dept . .23 Reprint Oversized Documents on Microfilm. . . . . . . . . . .20 Tape Recording Duplication . .20 Connection Charges Sanitary Sewer. . . . . . . . .11 Municipal Water. . . . . . . . .14 Docuacnts Oonprehensive Guide. . . . . . .19 Special Assessment Searches. .20 Municipal Oode/Ordinance . . .19 Realtors Listing Info. . . . .20 False Alarm Oser fee. . . . . . .22 Golf Course Rates. . . . . . . . .25 Inspections Special Inspection Charges . .17 CQntr2K:tual Inspection Serv. .18 Well Site Inspection. . . . .17 Licenses and Miscellaneous After-the-fact Fees. . . . . . .5 Amusement Devices. . . . . . . .22 Animal Impound Fees. . . . . . .21 Beer, Wine & Liquor License. .21 Conmercial Marina License. . .18 Cigarette License. . . . . . . .19 Dog License. . . . . . . . . . . .20 Dance (Public) License ... .22 Ganbling/Raffle License. . . .19 Licenses and Miscellaneous Garbage Haulets License. Home Occipation License. Joint Use Dock License . Kennel License . . . . . Septic Installers License Site Evaluator License . Solicitaticn License . . Temp Trailer/Building Lie Maps For Sale. Public Marks Supplies & Driveway Culverts. . . Driveway/Curb Cut Permits Page .18 .19 .18 .20 .18 .18 .19 .19 ;ic5es . .26 . .26 Permits After-the-fact-Fees. . . . . . .5 Annual Service Charge (Septic)14 Building Permit Fees . . . . . 8 Burning Permit Fee . . . . . . .17 Cert, of Occipancy. . . . . . .8 Demolition Permit Fee. . . . . .8 Docks Ccwnmercial ....................................8 Residential. . . . . . . . . . .8 Fire Protection. . . . . . . . .17 Firearms Permit Fee. . . . . . .22 Fireworks Permit Fee. . . . .22 Grading, Excavating, Filling .15 Large Assembly Permits ... .22 Mechanical Permit Fees .... 9 ^toveAift Building Permit Fee. 16 Municipal Hookip (SewerA^ater) 10 On-Site Systems (Septic) . . .14 Outhouse Construction. . . . .14 Parades & Special Events . . .22 Plumbing Permit. . . . . . . . . .8 Permits (Oont.) Page Retaining Wall . . . . . . . 8 Sprinkler Systems - Conmer . .10 Trapping Permit (limited). . .22 Water Meter Fees. . . . . . . .102 Services Fingerprinting (Police). . . .23 Water Turn-On Charge. . . . .24 Water Turn-Off Charge. . . . . .24 Signs Street Signs (Publ’ Works). .26 Tenporary & Permanent. . . . .15 Temp. "No Parking" (P.D.). . .23 Temp. "No Parking" (P.W.). . .26 Utility Rate Charges. . . . . . .24 Recycling Charge. . . . . . . . .24 Replacement Bins. . . . . . . . .24 Zoning Applications After-the-fact Fees ................. 5 3 5 2 1 5 7 3 3 5 4 2 5 3 1 Amendments Appeal of Admin Decision . Conmercial Site Plan . . . Conditional Use Permit Fees Industrial Revenue Bond Appl Park Dedication Fees . . PUD Rezoning . . . . . . Rezoning Application Fee Rip Rap Application Fee. Sp^ial Improvements Appl Subdivision Application Fee Surcharge for Staff Expense Vacation Application Fee . Variance Application Fee . ORDINANCE NO.SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 1991 FEE SCHEDULE AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 62 SECOND SERIES, 65 SECOND SERIES, 68 SECOND SERIES, 70 SECOND SERIES, 73 SECOND SERIES, 74 SECOND SERIES AND 76 SECOND SERIES The City Council of the City of Orono ordains: Section 1. Ordinance Repea 1ed. Ordinance No. 62 Second Series, 65 Second Series, 68 Second Series, 70 Second Series, 73 Second Series, 74 Second Series and 76 Second Series are hereby repealed• The City Council of Orono per Section 1.05 of the Municipal Code hereby ordains the following Fees effective during the calendar year 1991: SBCTION 1. Fees. ZOMliy APPLICATIONS All i^ees are applTcation fees and are non-re fundable after staff work has begun on the application. Application Type Fee Applicable Code Section VARIANCE $175.00 10.06,Subd 3(D) (Flexible applications involving more than one variance will require an additional $50.00 payment per each variance) RENEWAL VARIANCE $100.00 10.06,Subd 3(D) (No change from original application) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (One charge per project)10.09,Subd 3 Residential Accessory Use (Animals, etc.)$125.00 10.09,Subd 3 Institutional Use (School, Church, etc.)$150.00 10.09,Subd 3 Duplex Credit (per building)$150.00 10.09,Subd 3 Guest House/Guest Apartment $150.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $250.00 10.09,Subd 3 20HIWG APPLICATIONS (COHT.) Application Type Fee Applicable Code Section CONDITIONAL USE PEWIIT Continued (One Charge per Project) 10.09, Subd 3 Land Alteration: $200.00 + permit Grading, filling, etc. (over 100 cubic yards) Sea walls, retaining walls within 0-75' lakeshore Subdivision Fee plus $30.00 per dwelling unitPRD Application with Subdivision PRD Application without Subdivision PID Applications Renewal Conditional Use Permit (no change from original application) Conditional Use Permit with Variance After-the-Fact Fees COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN SUBDIVISION Sketch Plan (Class I, II, & III) Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivisions) Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) Final Plat Review (Class III) Filing Fees: a) Subdivision only b) Subdivision + Eai Covenants Renewal Subdivision Application $ 35.00 per dwelling unit (minimum $150.00) $150.00 per acre (minimum $350.00) 1/2 Current Fee $ 50.00 for each variance Double Application Fee Res. 11306 & #1309 $200.00 + Consultant Fee $150.00 $250.00 11.10, Subd 7(A) 11.10, Subd 10(A)(B) $300.00 -l-$20/lot 11.10,Subd 10(C) ($360/3 lots; $380/4 lots) $150.00 +Special Legal/Engineering Charges 11.10, Subd 17(A)(9) $ 75.00 11.10, Subd 17(A)(11) &$150.00 1/2 of current fee .J ZONIHG APPLICATIONS (CONT.) Application Type PUBLIC PROPERTY VACATION Fee Applicable Code Section $ 50.00 per Section 10.11 benefitting property ($250.00 minimum per application) EASEMENT VACATIONS WITH SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS $ 50.00 Section 10.11 EASEMENT VACATIONS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS $175.00 Section 10.11 ZONING AMENDMENTS INCLUDING REZONING $250.00 Section 10.11 PUD Rezoning - Allowed only within area Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 2 adjacent to Highway 12 as defined in Ord 74, 2nd Series Section 10.53 PUD Rezoning: Residential $250.00 + $35.00 per dwelling unit Comroercial/Industrial $150.00 per acre (min. $350.00) REQUEST TO AMEND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN $250.00 Section 10.11 gPHIBG APPLICATIOMS (COMT.) Application Type Fee Applicable Code Section SPECIAL IMPROVEMENTS Section 11.12, Subd 4 Non-refundable charges for City Engineer's review of applications and design drawing, including construction inspection fees. If improvements are proposed as part of a Subdivision, Review Charges are payable with Preliminary Plat application. Proposed Private Roads Proposed Public Roads Request for City to accept existing private road Proposed Sanitary Sewer Main Extension Proposed Watermain Extension Proposed Storm Sewer System (excluding culverts) On-Site System - Site Evaluation Review (applicable to rural subdivision applications) $600.00 plus 50g?/lineal foot $900.00 plus 500/lineal foot $900.00 $250.00 plus $5.00 per stub $250.00 plus $5.00 per stub $200.00 $ 50.00 per new lot proposed for on-site ZONING APPLICATIONS (CONT.) Application Type Fee Applicable Code Section RIP-RAP Staff Review (normal rip-rap) Unusual Rip-Rap; a) New installation b) Repair existing APPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BOND APPLICATIONS Minimum Project Valuation; $250,000.00 Application Fee; No Charge $100.00 + CUP review Staff permit * $100.00 $100.00 10.06, Subd 3(D) 0.1% of project valuation ($250.00 minimum) plus $5,000.00 deposit ^or legal/ administrative expenses SURCHARGE FOR STAFF EXPENSE IN EXCESS OF APPLICATION FEES Section 10.11 Per Fee Schedule setforth below; Professional Time $ 28.00/hour Clerical Time $ 16.75/hour Legal/Engineering Consultants Actual Billed Cost Mileage/Copies/Postage/Etc. Actual Cost AFTER-THE-FACT APPLICATION INVESTIGATION FEES (Resolution 1306) (Applies to all application types including variances, conditional use permits, subdivision, zoning amendments, rip-rap permits, special improvement reviews, grading permits, moving permits, business licenses, kennel licenses, all building permits and all general permits.) This permit fee may be waived by L*-aff for resident property owners who have not involved a contractor in their work, have no previous history of work without a permit and where such work does not entail any zoning violations. ZOHIHG APPLICATIONS (CONT,) Whenever any work, use or division of land for which a formal application is required has been commenced without first making such application and receiving City approval therefore, a special investigation of the circumstances shall be made during the application process. Because of the extra administrative costs involved in the special investigation, the minimum application fee for after- the-fact applications shall be twice the fee setforth in the basic fee schedule, whether or not the application is thereafter approved or denied. Payment of an after-the-fact application fee shall not constitute approval or authorization of the work, use, or division of land, and shall not constitute a penalty or a waiver of the right of the City to institute civil or criminal legal actions against the applicant for commencing such work, use or division of land without the required prior approval of the City. After-the-fact Investigation Fee Amount:Equal to and in addition to the basic fee amount (total fee is twice the basic fee amount) Res. 1306 ZCHUMG APPLICAYTOWS (CONT.) PARK DEDICATION FEES I Ordinance #82, 2nd Series Amended #89, 2nd Series Cash Contribution in Lieu of Lands. In those instances where a cash contr ibut"ion is to be made by the sudbivider, in lieu of a conveyance or dedication of land, the cash contribution to be contributed shall be equivalent to the fair market value of the equivalent undeveloped land that would otherwise have been conveyed or dedicated. The City shall account for such funds in a special fund named Park Dedication Funds. Land Dedication Minimum Area - Subdividers shall be required to dedicate to the City for parks, playgrounds, trails, open spaces and other public purposes as a minimum that percentage of gross land area, or other such amount as may be determined by the City Council, as set forth below: (1) Residential/Agricultural/Multiple Residential Zoned Land. Dedication requirement of 8% of the land being platted, subdivided or existing lot of record. (2) Commercial/Industrial Zoned Land. Dedicated requirement of 8% of the land being platted subdivided or existing lot of record. CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND INSPECTION FEES Permit Type BUILDING PERMIT Fee Applicable Code Section (Ord. 216) Minimum Fee Normal Fee Plan Review Fee: Commercial Residential Building Valuation Standard $ 30.00 (p^r 1988 UBC/SBC Standard Schedule) (per 1988 UBC/SBC Standard Schedule) 65% of Building Permit Fee (per Current I.C.B.O. Building Standards/Building Valuation Data) ZONING CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WITHOUT BUILDING PERMIT (change in use) RETAINING WALLS (in excess of 42” also multiple tiered walls that exceed 42 and not located in lakeshore protected area) TREE REMOVAL WITHIN 0-75 DOCKS - RESIDENTIAL (Permanent and Initial Seasonal) DOCKS - COMMERCIAL DEMOLITION PERMIT Principal Structure Accessory Structure $ 50.00 $ 30.00 minimum (per 1988 UBC Standard Schedule) $ 30.00 $ 30.00 Ord. 10.22 Sub 3 Per 1988 UBC/SBC Standard Schedule (Ord. 216) $ 50.00 Initial inspection $ 25.00 for each requested inspection beyond initial inspection $ 30.00 Initial inspection CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND INSPECTION FEES (CONT.) Permit Type PLUMBING PERMIT Fee Applicable Code Section Mail-in postage & handling charge MECHANICAL PERMIT $ 30.00 minimum per project $ 5.00/fixture $ 3.00/fixture reset $ 1.50 * Minimum Fee for any Mechanical Permit Mail-in postage & handling charge $ 30.00 per project $ 1.50 Residential, Single Family & Duplex by Unit -furnace or boiler with flue -wood stove with flue -wood combination or add-on unit -fireplace with flue -central air conditioning -exhaust fans (bath, kitchen, attic, etc.) -solar space heating equipment -solar water heaters -repairs and replacement of the above -fire sprinkler systems -fuel storage -gas line inspection high/low pressure -lawn sprinkler system Type 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 00 each unit 00 00 each unit each unit 00 each unit 00 00 00 same 5 30 $ 30 $ 15 $ 30 each unit per project each system 00 each unit as above 00 per project 00 permanent or 00 00 each systr*" tempor ary CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND INSPECTION FEES (CONT.) Permit T^^pe Fee Applicable Code Section Commercial. Industrial and Multi-Family Residential by Unit Type -residential type equipment -furnace, boilers, unit heaters, and makeup air units -central air conditioning -exhaust fans -refrigeration -fixed equipment with steam, hydraulic or compressed air system -kitchen exhaust vents -fuel storage -fire alarm system -lawn sprinkler system SPRINKLER SYSTEMS - COMMERCIAL -fire sprinkler systems 15.00 per unit 15.00 per 50,000 btuh output 15.00 per ton AC 15.00 per project 15.00 per compressor 15.00 per 8 connections 15.00 15.00 permanent or temporary 30.00 per system 30.00 per system 2. 00 per head/first 50 -kitchen fire extinguishing s 'tern heads - .30 per head after initial 50 Plan Review 1/2 permit fee Surcharge based on valuation $ 30.00 per system MUNICIPAL CONNECTION PERMIT (together with area connection charges) Sewer Water 5/8" meter including sale*^ tax 3/4" meter including saleu tax 1" meter including sales tax larger meter Mail-in postage & handling charge (sewer and water permits only) $ 30.00 $ 30.00 $125.00 $163.00 $218.00 quote basis $ 1.50 ALL SAHITARY SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES (If not previously assessed or if an improvement project is not deemed to be required in the sole discretion of the City. If an improvement is required, the connection charge may be in addition to any assessment.) By District - Project Office Use Only ♦Credit to Fund 1963 ST-lA, LS-IA or STl-B, LSl-B 1964 LS-IA or LS-IB 1965 LS-1 1965 LS-IA 1967 LS-1 1969 LS-1 Shore Hills 1969 LS-2 Chevy Chase 1970 LS-1 Saga Hill 1971 LS-1 Dunwoody 1973-1 1980-1 Minnetonka Bluffs West Ferndale/County Road 15 Orono Lane County Road 15 Marinas 1980- 2 North Shore Drive/Scotch Pine T ne 1981- 1 North Shore Drive/Highwood 198‘2-lA Navarre Utilities 1982- lB Navarre Utilities Northern Avenue 1985-1 Crystal Bay 1983- 1 Highway 12 Orono-Long Lake-Medina Sanitary Sewer Connection Charges ♦Credit to Fund $225.00 + $427.80 per acre + 31.11 per F.F. $225.00 + $31.70 per F.F. $225. $225. $203. $225. $7,224. $225. $225. $6,823. $8,720. $25,490, $16,329, $6,798, $24,035, $10,431 $2,222, 00 + $46.67 per F.F. 00 + $34.07 per F.F. 55 per unit + $20.33 per F.F. 00 + $10,083.89 per unit 57 per unit 00 + $3,863.71 per unit + 23.74 per F.F. 00 + $3,519.09 per unit + 21.62 per F.F. 47 per unit 63 26 70 19 + $32.35 per unit per F.F. per unit per unic per unit 08 per unit 16 per unit 64 per unit + $912.20 trunk area $225.00 + $2,400.51 per acre + 180.04 trunk unit $10,543.62 per unit $990.20 per unit 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 225.00=1 acre/unit=3 4 2 1) 073-3753-000-00 2) 043-3753-000-00 3) 044-3753-000-00 5) 4) 045-3753-000-00 6) 024-3753-000-00 046-3753-000-00 ALL SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES (If not previously assessed or if improvement project is not deemed to be required in the sole discretion of t e City. If an improvement is required, the connection charge may be in addition to any assessment.) By District - Project I. An additional fee is charged for properties benefitting from 1984 forcemain and lift station 17 upgrade, as follows (see map for affected areas): 2. 4. 5. Existing Properties/Increase New Bldgs Replacing Existing Bldgs Initital Charge Previously Paid Previously Paid #6 By Pass 17 Forcemain Previously Paid Previously Paid $402.09 If usage increases from existing $402.09 3. New Residential W/Existing Stub Previously Previously Paid Paid $1,164.24 New Residential Without Stub $225.00(1) Freshwater Biological $225.00(1' $180.04(3) $180.04(3) $1,164.24(5) $500/unit on(5) connection (already assessed $2,000/ac) 1) 073-3753-000-JO 2) 043-3753-000-00 3) 044-3753-000-00 4) 045-3753-000-00 5) «) 024-3753-000-00 046-3753-000-00 Office Use Only ♦Credit to Fund 1, 3 & 5 1, 3 & 5 ALL SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES (If not previously assessed or if an improvement project is not deemed to be required in the sole discretion of the City. If an improvement is required, the connection charge may be in addition to any assessment.) BY...Di^r:-t > Prqi^t II. An additional fee is chagred for properties benefitting from the 1989 gravity line and lift station #10 by-pass per Resolution #2671, as follows (see map for affected areas): Init ital Charge i .0 By Pass Office Use Only ♦Credit tc Fund Property Without Stub $225.00(1) $2,025.11(6)1 & 6 The connection charge for properties wishing to connect to the sewer but which are located outside the delineated boundaries of the affected project area shall be charged the connection fee for that affected project area. Such connections are subject to City Council approval. Sanitary Sewer Connection Charges ♦Credit to Fund 1) 073-3753-000-00 2) 043-3753-000-00 3) 044-3753-000-00 4) 045-3753-000-00 5) 024-3753-000-00 6) 046-3753-000-00 13 all MOmClPAL WATER CONNECTION CHARGES If not previously assessed Improvement project is not deemed to ' - -_i- City. If an improvement is required, assessment) By District -• Project : i f an be required in the sole discretion of the the connection charge may be in addition to any Office Use Only ♦Credit to Fund 1967 LW-1 Highway 12/Crystal Bay Road 1969 LW-2 Chevy Chase 1970 LW-1 Navarre Residential 1970 LW-1 Navarre Commerical 1982-lA Navarro ON-SITE SYSTEMS Design Review Fees Subdivision Site Evaluation Report Review Residential System Permit: Replace drainfield or replace 1/more tank Replace drainfield & replace 1/more tank New Residential System Non-Residential Syotem Permit; New or Total replacement Partial replacement $3,563.20 per unit 1 + $26.42 per F.F. $3,531.18per unit 1 $1,764.53 per unit 1 + $17.54 per F.F. $2,646.79 per unit 1 + $26.47 per F.F. $1,880.21 per unit 2 Annual Service Charge (Ord. 210) Included with permit fees $ 50.00/per new lot $ 30.00 $ 50.00 $ 75.00 + $15.00 per each inspection over 3 (Includes outhouse on Big Island) $100.00 + $20.00 per each inspection over 4 $ 60.OC + $20.00 per each inspection over 2 $ 25.00/system/year plus An additional full fee for late penalty plus 8% interest for unpaid charges certified Section 12.30, Subd 8(C) Water Connection Charges ♦Credit to Fund 1) 072-3753-000-00 2)044-3753-000-00 1 4 CONSTRUCTIOH PERMITS AND INSPECTION FEES (CONT.) Permit Type Applicable Code Section GRADING, EXCAVATION, FILLING - 1-100 cubic yards (max. 10 loads) - 101 + cubic yards $ jO.uu (staff permit) (+engineering fee if necessary) $ 75. + Conditional Use Permit + $25.00 per each inspection over 1st NOTE: 101 cubic yards or more requires a Conditional Use Permit unless approved as part of building permit. SIGNS Temporary Permanent $ 30.00 (Per 1988 UBC/SBC Standard Schedule) k COWSTRUCTIOH PERMITS AND INSPECTION FEES (CONT.) Permit Type r^ee Applicable Code Section BUILDING MOVING OR LIFTING Fees for this activity are _ _ _ _ _ Fees and any necessary surcharges (Ord. 227) in addition to required building or demolition permits. buildingarere1 red to pay costs of building code inspections, public works inspections of streets and reasonable police escort service on oversize movements. -Lifting accessory buildings (no move across lot lines) -Lifting principal buildings (no move across lot lines) (include pre-lift inspection fee) -Moving accessory building within normal highway clearance (max. 8* wide/max. 13'-6" high/max. 45’ -Moving principal buildings over any lot line, onto or off any lot within Orono; includes any move on or over any City street even if not originating or term­ inating in Orono (Include all over­ size loads exceeding 12' wide and/or 15* high). $ 30.00 $ 75.00 + engineering fee if necessary No moving permit required long) $150.00 -Pre-move code inspection, principal buildings; a) Building within Orono to be relocated $ 50.00 within Orono b) Building outside Orono to be moved $150.00 into Orono (max. radius 25 miles) 16 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND INSPECTION FEES (CONT.) Permit Type Fee SPECIAL INSPECTION CHARGES Site Inspection without permit (when called by owner) Inspection surcharge for work or application on Big Island or Deering Island Reinspection fee after failure to comply with Building or Zoning Code Correction Notice - 3rd trip Well Site Inspection FIRE PROTECTION Fire Prevention Inspection Fire Code Permits Commercial Fire Alarm Plan Review Fee BURNING PERMITS Up to 5 times per year For Each Reinspection More than 5 times per year (for all organizations and individuals regardless of tax status) Applicable Code Section $ 30.00 $ 30.00 per trip + boat rental transportation is not provided by owner $ 30.00 per trip + 30.00 per hour after 1st hour $ 30.00 (If required or requested) (Ord. 223) No Charge $ 30.00 each Per UBC Schedule 65% of permit fee No Charge $20.00 $100.00 17 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND INSPECTION FEES (CONT.) Permit Type CONTRACTUAL INSPECTION SERVICE Monthly Retainer Fee (Includes clerical time) Inspection Charge Plan Review Charge Clerical Fee (Only charged if clerical use is excessive) LICENSES t MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES Zoning Department Administered COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE Application Fee (initial) Renewal Application & Inspection Fee (annual) plus: -each slip on water -each dry slip inside or in racks -each boat unit on land -late fee JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE Application Fee (initial) Renewal Application Fee Plus each slip Late Fee SEPTIC INSTALLERS LICENSE - Annual SITE EVALUATOR LICENSE - Annual GARBAGE HAULER LICENSE - flat rate - per hauler - transfer fee Fee Applicable Code Section Per Contract $ 25.00 per month $ 15.00 per inso..ction SBC/UBC Schedule $ 15.00 per hour $300.0*3 + slip & boat fees $200.00 + slip & boat fees $ 2.00 $ 2.00 $ l.OJ $150.00 $ 5L.00 $ 20.00 $ 2.00 $ 25.00 $ 50.00 $100.00 $ 30.00 $ 15.00/truck $ 30.00 1 8 LICENSES & MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES (CONT.) Permit Type HOME OCCUPATION LICENSE TEMPORARY TRAILERS & BUILDINGS LICENSE Zoning Department Administered ZONING DEPARTMENT DOCUMENTS Comprehensive Guide Plan (1980) Municipal Code Book - Complete (Ch. 1-12 w/revisions) Municipal Code Book - Portions Ch 1 thru 9 (Book 1) w/revisions Ch 10 thru 12 (Book 2) w/revisions Ch 10 only (Zoning Code) w/revisions Ch 11 only (Subdiv. Code) w/revisions Other Individual Chapters Black Binder On-Site Design Manual City Maps Building & Planning Publications General Administrative Licenses Cigarette Sales License - per quarter Fee Applicable Code Section $ 50.00 Initial Review Fee $ 30.00 (Annual Review Fee) $ 30.00 $ 30.00 $ 60.00 w/black binder $ 50.00 loose $ 35.00 loose $ 35.00 loose $ 25.00 loose $ 15.00 loose $ .25 /page $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 2.00 each As Posted - Prices subject to change 5.00 10.00 20.00 Gambling & Raffle License Solicitation License Up to 10 Solicitors - $1.00 each additional solicitor Solicitor must list only those that will be in Orono 5.24 5.23 5.30 in Orono LICENSES t MISCELLANEIOUS CHARGES (CONT.) Permit Type Fee General Administrative Documents Listing Information Assessment Search - Written Verbal Search - Current and/or pending Copy Service (for public City records only) 11" X 17" copies Individual copies of Ordinances (1 copy) Reprint of Oversized Documents that have been microfilmed Building Plan Copies and/or Tape Recording Duplication Applicable Code Section $ 10.00 $ 10.00/parcel Not Given Out $ .25 each $ 1.00 each No Charge $ 25.00 Minimum Charge Cost of Copying, Messenger Service & Min. Clerical Fee of $5.00 (entire amount to be paid upon request) Dogs & Kennels DOG LICENSES Biannual License (issued in odd years) $ 15.00 Annual License (issued in even years only) $ 7.50 KENNEL LICENSES 9.12 5.36 Commercial Application & Inspection Fee $150.00 (Annual) Residential Application & Inspection Fee $ 25.00 (Annual) NOTE: Dogs kept in residential ke nels must be individually licensed. Residential kennel fee is in addition to dog license fees. 20 LICENSES t MISCELLANEOOS CHARGES (CONT.) Permit Type DOGS AT LARGE - RELEASE FEE Fee Applicable Code Section 9.12 First Offense $ 20.00 Second Offense $ 30.00 Third Offense $ 40.00 (All fees, plus kennel charg<^ , payable *-o kennel) ANIMALS AT LARGE (Other than dogs) First Offense Second Offense Third Offense Trace & Catch Animal Trailer Charge CARE OF IMPOUNDED ANIMAL Police Department Administered BEER, WINE & LIQUOR LICENSES Initial Investigation On-Sale/Off-Sale In state investigation Out state investigation-actual cost 9.13 $ 20.00 $ 35.00 $ 50.00 $ 20.00/hour $ 20.00 plus .25 mile (total distance) Actual Cost Liquor$500.00 per License '^ol . ^cted at Application al cost up to $10,000 Initial Investigation-Beer/Wine '0/person Res. Off-Sale Liquor License 4.30 Bond Requirement $ 00 On-Sale Liquor License $4 .00 4.30 On-Sale Wine License $75l.30 4.40 3.2 Beer Off-Sale (Annual)$ 25.00 4.20 3.2 Beer On-Sale (Annual)$ 75.00 4.20 Setups (Annual)$100.00 4.60 Club Liquor License (weekday)$100.00 4.50 (Sunday)$200.00 4.50 Temporary Set-up Permit (one day)$ 25.00/each 4.61 Temporary Beer Permit (one day)$ 15.00/each 4.21 zi LICENSES AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES (CONT.) Application Type Police Department Administered AMUSEMENT DEVICE LICENSES Per Establishment (Annual) Per Machine Fee PUBLIC DANCE LICENSE (Annual) (Individual Permit) LARGE ASSEMBLY PERMIT FIREWORKS PERMI-^ FIREARMS DlSCr IGE PERMIT OCCASIONAL (limitc- use) Annual (Club Only) LIMITED TRAPPING PERMIT PERMIT FOR PARADES & SPECIAL EVENTS FALSE ALARM USER FEES First 3 false alarms/calendar year (1-3 total) Next 7 false alarms/calendar year (4-10 total) Next 5 false alarms/calendar year (11-15 total) Each additioi A false alarm over 15/ calendar year App1icable Code Section 5.20 $100.00 plus machine fee $ 25.00 each $100.00 $ 10.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 10.00 $ 25.00 $ 20.00 $ 50.00 5.21 5.21 5.25 9.10 9.10 9.11 Ord. 232 Ord. 243 6.08 No Charge $ 50.00 each call $100.00 each call $150.00 each call LICENSES AND MISCELLANEOUS CHAR^ Application Type Police Department Administered FINGERPRINTING SERVICE COPY SERVICE Police Records (CONT.) Fee App1icable Code Section $ 10.Oo/applicatio I (Citizenship No Charge) First Two Copies $3. 00 Additional Copies $0.5P each COPY OF ACCIDENT REPORTS $3. 00 each COPY OF DRIVER'S LICENSE RECCID $3.00 each COPY microfiche FILE F 3 1wo Copie s $5.00 At onal Copies $. 25 each "NO . KiNG ORDER OF POLICE" PAPER SIGNS (no lathe included) $0.25 each PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS CUARGES Utility Service Rates • Effective beginning Third Quarter 1986 MUNICIPAL SEWER RATE by unit: 1st 2nd by flow: $ 51.15 per quarter $ 48.25 per quarter $ 2.90 per quarter per $1.90/1000 gallons MUNICIPAL WATER RATES Billing & Ready to Serve Chg Water Usage Rate Unconnected Property Chg (ready to serve/hydrant chg) Area #1 Navarre Area If2 * Long Lake Area S3 Wayzata $12.80/qtr $6.70/qtr $5.35/qtr $ 1.17/1000 gal $2.75/1000 gal $1.40/lu00 gal $12.80/qtr -0- -0- Bulk sale to Minnetonka Beach for Lafayette Ridge Area - Area #1 Rate $12.80/qtr billing charge plus $1.17/1000 gallon tota' low at bordcL meter. P*ft«j(^.lty for late payment of sewer/water bills billing date. Inte est at 8% on unpaid water/sewer a f ter 4 5 days f * jm -s certified. Water Turn-On Water Turn-Off $17.50 $17.50 Water System Repair/Replacement if damage caused by property owner: Labor - Current Hourly Rate Parts - At Cost RECYCLING CHARGE Recycling Container - Tnitial Replacement (including sales tax) •Effective second quarter of 1988 $ 12.00/year Mo Charge $ 6.50 each PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES (CONT.) GOLF COURSE CHARGES - Effective date 1991 Season Monday thru Friday (excluding Holidays) Begin Play Before 12:00 Noon 1st Nine Holes 2nd Nine Holes After 12 Noon and Weekend Rates 1st Nine Holes 2nd Nine Holes Fee $ 6.50 $ 4.50 $ 7.00 $ 4.50 League Rates Monday thru Friday Senior Citizen (Over 60 years old) Begin Play Before 12:00 Noon - Weekdc’ys 1st Nine Holes 2nd Nine Holes $ 6.50 $ 4.50 $ 4. 50 Season Ticket (Senior Citizens Only) GOLF CART RENTAL Motorized 1st Nine Holes (After 12:00 & Weekends) 2nd Nine Holes Monday thru Friday (Excluding Holidays) 1st Nine Holes Begin Play Before 12:00 Noon Pull Carts - Per Round Golf ' bs - Per Round Concessions $100.00 $10.00 $ 8.00 ■* 6.00 $6.00 $ 1.00 $ 2.00 As Posted 2 5 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES (CONT.) PUBLIC WORKS SUPPLIES & SERVICES Street or Traffic Signs (sale includes installation) Driveway Culverts fsale only, not installed) Wftter Meter Sales (See Building Permit Section) Temporary No Parking Signs (with lathe) Driveway/Curb-Cut Permits Indi/idual Driveways ^ _ _ _^ New Street Intersections (See zoning section - special improvement fees) SECTION 2. This ordinance establishing the 1991 fee schedule shall be published in the Laker and Pioneer Newspaper and shall be effective the week of January 1, 1991* Fee $ 75.00/std. sign On Quote Basis $ 1.00 each $ 30.00/permit W Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this 1990. ATTEST; _day of_ Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek,Mayor ORDINANCE NUMBER , SECOND SERIES SUMMARY APPROVED The Council hereby determines that the text of the summary of this ordinance marked "Official Summary of Ordinance Number , Second Series," and a copy of which is attached hereto, clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. The Council further determines that publication of the title and such summary will clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. OFFICIAL SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NUMBER , SECOND SERIE. , SECOND SERIES AN ORI/IANCNE ADOPTING THE 1990 FEB SCHEDULE AH ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 62 SECOND ORDINANCE NO. SERIES, 65 SECOND SERIES, 68 SECOND SERIES, 70 SECOND SERIES, 73 SECOND SERIES, 74 SECOND SERIES AND 76 SECOND SERIES. Number The following is the official summary of Ordinance _ _, Second Series approved by the City Council of the City of Orono on The following sections have changes, additions and/or deletions: ZONING APPLICATIONS 1990 1991 SURCHARGE FOR STAFF EXPENSE IN EXCESS OF APPLICATION FEES Per Fee Schedule setforth below: Professional Time $ 27.50/hour Clerical Time $ 16.50/hour $ 28.00/hour $ 16.70/hour BUILDING PERMIT Minimum Fee $ 30.00 All reference to the 1985 UBC/SBC Standard Schedule 19' ] UBC/SBC Stncdrar Schedule Deleted is now: MECHANICAL PERMIT Residential, Single Family & Duplex by Unit Type -fire sprinkler systems $ 15.00 per project $ 30 per project ALL CONNECTION CHARGES (IF NCT PREVIOUSLY ASSESSED) BY DISTRICT - PROJECT ALL SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES (If not previously assessed) Various Various reflecting cost of investment ALL MUNICIPAL WATER CONNECTION CHARGES Various (If not previously assessed) Various reflecting cost of investment ON-SITE SYSTEMS Subdivision Site Evaluation Report Review $ 30.G0/per new lot $ 50.00/per new lot Annual Service Charge $ 20.00/system $25.00/system/year plus /year plus An additional full fee for late penalty plus 8% interest for unpaid charges certified. CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND INSPECTION FEES 1990 WELL PERMITS -Installation of New/Replacement well $ 30.00 (covers abandonment of old well) -Well Abandonment (not concurrent with $ 30.00 installation of new/replacement well) BUILDING MOVING OR LIFTING -Moving accessory building over any $100.00 lot line, onto or off any lot within Orono (includes oversize loads up to 12' wide and/or 15’ high). SPECIAL INSPECTION CHARGES Well Site Inspection $ 30.00 (If Required or Requested) LICENSES AND MISCELLANEIOUS CHARGES FIREWORKS PERMIT $ 30.00 LIMITED TRAPPING PERMIT $ 10.00 PERMIT FOR PARADES & SPECIAL EVENTS $ 25.00 Police Department Administered COPY FROM MICROFICHE FILE First Two Copies $ Additional Copies $ 5.00 25 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS CHARGi- Utility Service Rates Water Turn-On Water Turn-Off 1991 Deleted Deleted Deleted $ 15.00 $ 15.00 New $ 50.00 $ 20.00 $ 50.00 No Change $ .50 $ 17.50 $ 17.50 RECYCLING CHARGE $ 9.00/year $ 12.00/year PUBLIC WORKS DEPART?!ENT MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES Continued 1990 1991 GOLF COURSE CHARGES - Effective date 1991 Season Monday thru Friday (excluding Holidays) Begin Play Before 12:00 Noon 1st Nine Holes $ 2nd Nine Holes $ After 12 Noon and Weekend Rates 1st Nine Holes 2nd Nine Holes League Rates Monday thru Friday Senior Citizen (Over 60 years old) Begin Play Before 12:00 Noon - Weekdays 1st Nine Holes $ 2nd Nine Holes $ GOLF CART RENTAL (After 12:00 & Weekends) Motorized 1st nine holes $ 2nd nine holes $ Monday thru Friday (Excluding Holdiays) 1st nine holes A printed copy of the 1991 Fee Schedule Ordinance is available for inspection by any person at the office of the City Clerk during regular office hours. Season 6.00 $6.50 4.00 $4.50 6.50 $7.00 4.00 $4.50 6.00 $6.50 4.00 $4.50 4.00 $4. 50 10.00 $10.00 3.00 $8.00 $6.00 - -$6.00 1991. nays This ordinance becomes effective the week of January Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this day of ___________1990, by a vote of ______ ayes and ___ ATTEST:James P. Grabek, Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk 111390.4 TO: M3Vor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator DATE: November 13, 1990 SUBJECT: 1991 Budget Public Hearing *1 Attachment: A. 1991 Budget Documented/Updated (Previously Distributed Dated 8/9/90 Updated 11/19/90) B. Comparison of 1990/91 Tax Levy Proposal C. Truth in Taxation Notices Received from County 11/8/90 D. Proposed Adoption Resolution for Tax Levy ISSUE - 1. Reminder to Council of the upcoming public hearing scheduled for December 3, 1990. 2. Present additional information to r-juncil requested at the November 8, 1990 Workshop. INTRODUCTION - At the Council's August 27, 1990 Council meeting Council established December 3, 1990 as the primary date for the public hearing with a continuation date slated for December 18, 1990 should that be needed. At the Council's public hearing last year only one person appeared to listen to the discussion on the budget. DISCUSSION - As outlined at the Council's Noverher 8, 1990 Workshop the general budget overall is proposed to go up ^ust under 4% which includes a 3% salary adjustment for 1991 and the flexibility for some addition if deemed appropriate. That budget included maintenance of the current programs together with the addition of a full-time permanent septic inspection position, which is discussed under a separate agenda item. While the General Fund levy is going up just under 4% which represents a 5/lOths of 1% increase in the individual tax bill and probably substantially less than the increase in value of property or the inflation rate. The City total rate is estimated to go up 13.1% if the proposal preliminarily adopted on August 27 is final proposal adopted by the Council. The bulk of this is for $140,000 levy to allow the City to be in a position to pay off the 1989 sewer and water bonds early with the net effect of that being to give the City 'ncome stream from the special assessments during the term of tne assessment and still allow any development to fully pay its entire cost in the longterm. By doing this it allows the City additional levy authority in the short term together with placing the City in a position to be able to lower its outstanding bond debt in the near term. ALTERNATIVES 1. Accept the information. 2. Ask any additional questions. 3. Take no action. recommendation - Once Council has raised any further questions they des 3 :e in advance of the Budget Hearing accept the information . PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded 1/Council accept the information and indicate any additional information they would like in advance of the December 3, 199C Public Hearing. Ayes , Nays li:090.2 1990 AND 1991 LEVYS ATTACHMENT B Updated 11/19/90 Percentage Increase As Collectable 1990 Collectable Percent 1991 Change Dollar Change A Function Of 1990 Total Levy Tax Capacity (Change #'s) General Ad Valorum 1,585,546 1,644,831 3.7%$ 59,285 3.6% Special Assessments 0 5,910 5,910 .36% TOTAL 1,585,546 1,650,741 4.1%$ 65,195 Bonded Debt 1980 Bonds 17,700 17,300 - 400 — 1982 Bonds 0 5,500 5,500 .33% 1985 Bonds 35,000 40,000 5,000 .30% 1989 Bonds 0 0,000 140,000 8.5% TtTTAL 52,700 2,800 $150,100 '■ ’iinum Levy 1,638,246 1,823,541 13.1%$215,295 - Each Percentage of 1990 Maximum Levy is ri6.400 i! - Given that the City of Orono taxes make us 13.5% property tax bill a: of a person 's City % Increase Total Tax Increase $ Increase/$1000 of Property Taxes 13.1%1.7%$17.00 10.0%1.3%$13.00 8%1.1%$11.00 6%.8%$ 8.00 4%.5%$ 5.00 NOTICE OF PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX FOR 1991 ’’rop4s:-‘ty taxes your city, county and school district propose to collect, Meetings you can attend to give your opinioi . the tax amounts.... CITY OK ORONC P 0 BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323-0066 According to our rb ’-ds you are the taxpayer for property located in the taxing districts listed below Your city council (or township electors), your county commissioners and your school board will hold meetings soon to decide on the amount of property taxes to collect in 1991 to pay for services they will provide in the upcoming year. Line 1 below shows the total amounts of property tax your city, county and school district will collect in 1991 if they approve the amounts they are now considering. Referendums, special assessments, legal judgments, natural disasters and revised population figures could result in increasing these amounts. This notice does not show proposed property tax amounts for special taxing districts such as watershed and hospital districts, because they collect comparatively small amounts. Your city council, county commissioners and school Ooord members invite you to attend the meetings at the times and places shown t w to express yv-ur opinions on the proposed amounts of property tax before they ,e voted on. Total tar; proposed for 1991 Total tax for 1990 Change from 1990 to 1991 One year population change Times and places of eeetirgs on proposed taxes: Times and places of additional meetings if necessary! Where to send comrjnts and/or review a copy of the la'roposed budget City of ORONO t l,d53,5Al $ l,63b,2';i + 13.1*: 7:00 PM DEC 3RD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1335 BROWN ROAD SO ORONO MN 55391 7:00 PM DEC 13TH COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1335 BROWN ROAD SO ORONO MN 55391 ORONO CITY HALL 1335 BROWN ROAD SO ORONO MN 55391 County of HENNEPIN II II $ 3A9,039,989 I I $ 305,957,152 I I +19.3^ I I fl.9^ 5:30 PM NOV 15TH COMMISSIONER 3D ROOM A2900 GOVERNMENT CTR MPLS MN 55987 5:30 PM NOV 16TH COMMISSIONER BD ROOM A2930 GOVERNMENT CTR MPwS MN 55987 I HENN COUNTY OFFICE I OF BUDGET 8 FINANCE I A2301 GOVERNMENT CTR I MPLS MN 55987 School District No. 289 " - , -r,.- $ 33,688 . -96 $ 31,913,069 f7 z:: + 3.7*i pupil units 7:00 PM PEC lOTH DISTRIC- ADMIN BLDG 210 HWY 101 PLYMOUTH MN i 4'.,' 5:30 PM DEC 17TH BIRCHVIEW elementary I 925 RANCHVIEW I ANE I PLYMOUTH MN 55997 | I WAYZATA SCHOOLS PO BOX 660 WAYZATA MN 55391 NOTICE OF PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX FOR 1991 roperty taxes your city, county and school district propose to collect ■leetings you can attend to give your opinions on the tax amounts.... ITY OF ORONO 0 BOX 66 ^YSTAL BAY MN 55323-0066 According to our records you are the taxpayer for property located in the taxing districts listed below.c Your city council (or township electors), your county conmissioners and your school board will hold meetings soon to decide on the amount or property taxes to collect in 1991 to pay for services they will provide in the upcoming year. Line 1 below shows the total amounts of property tax your city, county and school district will collect in 1991 if they approve the amounts they are now considering. Referendums, special assessments, legal judgments, ^J®^^„J7rA^doeS^notpopulation figures could result in increasing these amounts. This notice does not show proposed property tax amounts for special taxing districts such as watershed and hospital districts, because they collect comparatively small amounts. Your city council, county commissioners and school board members invite you to attend the meetings at the times and places shown below to express your opinions on tha proposed amounts of property tax before they are voted on. otal tax proposed br 1991 otal tax for 1990 ^ange from 1990 to 1991 na year population lange imas and places of atings on proposed ixas: imas and places of dditional meetings necessary: lara to send comments id/or review a copy f the proposed budget City of ORONO $ 1,853,5A1 $ 1 ^>38,2A6 + 13.i:< + 1.3*/: 7:00 PM DFC 3RD COUNCIL CHAhflERS 1335 BROWN ROAD SO ORONO MN 55391 7:00 PM DEC 18TH COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1335 BROWN ROAD SO ORONO MN 55391 ORONO CITY HALL 1335 BROWN ROAD SO ORONO MN 55391 County of HENNEPIN $ 3A9,039,989 $ 305,957,152 + 19.3;: + 1.9;: 5:30 PM NOV 15TH COMMISSIONER BD ROOM A2900 GOVERNMENT CTR MPLS MN 55987 5:30 PM NOV 16TH COMMISSIONER BD ROOM A2900 GOVERNMENT CTR MPLS MN 55987 HENN COUNTY OFFICE OF BUDGET 8 FINANCE A2301 GOVERNMENT CTR MPLS MN 55987 School District No 278 - / $ 10,036,739 $ 8,582,189 + 16.9y. +2.8;: pupil units 7:00 PM DEC lOTH ORONO MIDDLE SCHOOL 685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY LONG LAKE MN 55356 7:00 PM DEC 13TH ORONO MIDDLE SCHOOL 685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY LONG LAKE MN 55356 ORONO MIDDLE SCHOOL 685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY LONG LAKE MN 5535b JUlI ji'.i NOV 8 1900 ^^0eisr D A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1990 TAX LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN 1991 BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, that the following sums of money be levied for the current year, collectible in 1991 upon the taxable property in the City of Orono, for the following purposes: General Fund Special Assessments against $ 1,644,831 City property for G.O. Sewer Bond 1985 Imp 5,910 G.O. Sewer Improvement Bond 1985 40,000 G.O. Sewer Improvement Bond 1980 17,300 G.O. Sewer, Water, Street Improvement Bond 1982 5,500 G.O. Water & Sewer Revenue Bond 1989 140,000 TOTAL $ 1,853,541 The City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a special meeting held December 3, 1990. ATTEST: James R. Grabek, Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk ii:o90.u fTO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrat DATE: November 21, 1990 SUBJECT: Reserve Call Up - Police Department Attachment: A. Administrator's Inforamtion Dated 8/22/90 (Memo only) ISSUE - Determine if Council will grant authority solicit to fill in the vacancy caused by a call up of Patrol Officer who is a member of a US Marine unit, INTRODUCTION - In Attachment A it was noted that there maybe a call up of one of the reservists. On Wednesday, November 21, 1990 the department was notified that Patrol Officer James Dembouski's unit had been activated effective December 1, 1990. This call up will be minimum of 90 days and probably extend for 6 months. The department has explored alternatives to fill the vacancy . ALTERNATIVES 1. Utilize the current part time officer from 20 hours to 40 hours. 2. Hire an additional temporary part time officer. 3. Hire a temporary officer for 40 hours for a minimum of 90 days and possibly 6 months. 4. Not fill the vacancy, and credit the reduction in service. 5. Table. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that Council grant staff the authority to seek a qualified temporary officer for up to 40 hours. (The current part time officer is also a paramedic at North Memorial and is not able to get a leave of absence.) Once a candidate is available this would be brought to Council for action. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, Council directs staff to seek a qualified temporary officer for up to 40 hours per week and that final action on employment be brought back to Council. Ayes _, Nays _. cc; Chief Kilbo 33390.4 /? TO: Mayor and City Council PROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrate DATE: August 22, 1990 SUBJECT: Administrator's Information HIGHWAY 12 - Attachment A is an initial list of objecjiives prepared“b7 the consult for the first meeting. Attachment B is a newsletter for a newly formed group - Concerned Citizens for Highway 12. RESERVIST STATUS - Two City employees are currently in the reserves, both in the Police Department. One is in the Naval Reserves and the other in the Marine Corps. It is expected that only one might be called. The department is currently making contingency arrangements should either be activated. PART-TIME SEPTIC POSITION - As you may be aware the staff is Ti^HiiiHding the current Tart time septic position be made full himp in the 1991 Budget. The current person has the credentials fofthe full time position. The funds for 1990 w i 11 e xp i re the end of September. Staff will bring forward a request to intend this funding for the balance of the year at the September 10th meeting. Please communicate any thoughts or issues you may have on this to me. LONG LAKE'S GOALS - See Attachmenc C. iii9?o.:: TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administratq DATE: November 19, 1990 SUBJECT: Administrator's Information JP' BEAVER TRAPPING - Attached is a memo from Chief Kilbo regarding information a¥ to the impact of the beavers on the Bosanko property as to number of trees and number of beaver trapped together with the length of the season. ACCREDITATION - At the Council's last meeting information was presented regarding the accreditation. Chief Kilbo has been in attendance at a seminar of which a copy of the brochure is attached. This item will be more fully presented possibly at the December 10, 1990. M E TRO__WAS TE_C0 NTROL_COM M I^SS^ON/RECONVE YANCE - City representatives are continuing to deal with Metro Waste regarding the means for reconveyance of the line from Navarre to Orono sewer plant back to the City. The City's last meeting with them was on October 31, 1990. Staff is providing additional information to Metro Waste and expect that a meeting will be set up possibly in December to discuss this further with the Waste Control Commission. SEPTEMBER RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS - See attachment. WIRE TRANSFERS - See attachment. DATE: November 19, 1990 TO: Mark Bei'nhardson, CiLy Administrat-or FROM: Mel Kilbo, Chief of Police RE: Beaver trapping permit, Bcsanko As requested by Council, I have done some research on it. I contacted DNR Enforcement, a Miss Huonders, 296-4771, who stated the beaver season runs from 10-22-90 to 4-30-91 and there is no limit on the take. Part of the problem, she said, is that they have an extremely high population of beaver in Minnesota, Another difficulty is the fact that it is a water set type of track so it’s very difficu.lt to put in properly. The fur price on beavers is down, plus the fact that it takes a great deal of time and effort to trap beaver. The final problem is local ordinances that prohibit the taking of beaver in some areas. I also talked to local Game Warden, Steve Walters, who says the beaver is presently in the state of harvesting their feed and stockpiling their feed for their winter and that they will take a great deal of cutting now until the water freezes over. I talked to the trapper, Ted Weidenfeller, who staged that they have taken 50 to 60 smaller trees, by that he meant 2 to 3 inches, and he said they are working on about 12 to 15 large trees which they girdle - in other words, go all the way around the tree. There are a number of giant willow trees that are in the process of dying because of this action. Beaver will have up to 6 young, so come spring there will be more beaver out there working. In 1988, the take for beaver was a total of 4, in 1989 they took 3 beaver, in 1990 so far they have not taken any of course. The DNR Enforcement stated that as long as we have an ordinance, if we do not permit trapping, if they become a problem, it is entirely the city’s problem, the DNR will NOT assist us in eradicating the beaver. .1 ■j ■1 •.5! ■M ...H ^^Accreditation has opened lines of communication to the community which has led to better seniceJ^ Chief Christ J. Bourns Danvers, .\fossachitsens ' The benefits we have received at this point are clearly identifiable—noticeably improved morale and associated pride, an extensive and complete set of updated policies and procedures and more definable and responsible programs... Sheriff Patrick J. Sullivan Arapahoe County. Colorado ^^We have the badge of authority that allows us to take away the freedom of a person, but within a s, "ct set of guidelines. Moreover, we carry weapons that we are allowed to use under another set of guidelines, rules and policies. . . I feel very strongly that we should operate in accord with a set of nationwide standards. . . Former Superintendent R. L. Suthard Vin^inia State Police "/ hope county commissioners elsewhere will support accreditation of their law enforcement agencies to ensure the best service to their community.^^ Commissioner John Bentley Elkhart Counn. Indiana " The proactive management system which is provided through the accreditation process allows us to be more aggressive in the provision of police services, assuring that we are maintaining services and staying abreast of the latest law enforcement techniques and practices.^^City Manager Bob Hart Pampa, Texas The Commission on AccrediUition for Law Enforcement Agencies, Inc., is a private, non­ profit corporation working to promote, recognize, and maintain professional e.\celience in iaw enforcement through accreditation. I'T-TT • • \ s. Q UESnONS ABOUT THE C OM MISS l aK Q Who organize d the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies—and when? The Commission was formed in 1979 through the combined efforts of four major law enforcement membership associations. These associations are the International Association of Chiefs of Police (lACP). National Orgamzauon of Black Law Enforcement E.xecutives (NOBLE). National Sheriffs’ .Association (NSA). and the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF/. ^.Accreditation adds a new dimension to the word professionalism' that is evidenced in the community's response and in the heightened esteem each officer has for himself and his fellow officers. Chief Bohlry Moixiy Coungton. Georgia \\ hv WHS the Commission created? The Commission was formed 10 develop a set of law enforcement standards and establish and adminis­ ter an accreditation process by which law enforce ­ ment agencies at the sDte and kxal levels can demonstrate voluntarily that they meet professional cntena. The overall goal of the accreditation program IS to improve the delivery of law enforcement services from coast to coast. Q Who serves on the Commission and how are they appointed? Represenuni diverse concerns, the 21-member Commission is composed of 11 law enforcement professionals and 10 representatives from other areas of the public and pnvate sectors. At this writing, the latter includes leaders in local and state government, educauon. the judiciarv’. labor, and business, among others. Commission members are appointed for three- year terms by the unanimous consent of the previously mentioned four law enforcement associations.__________________ realize that becoming accredited is not the final step. Rather, we must now, with a commitment to continued excellence, strive to maintain these high standards of performance. Sheriff John Moran Metropolitan Police Department Las Vei^as. Ne\ada Q How is the Commission organized? A nonprofit. ta.x-e.xempt corporation, the Com ­ mission appoints an e.xecutive director to implement its policies and head its staff. Major staff activities include: managing the accreditation prixess fmm application throiu’h reaccreditation; recruiting, select­ ing, training a coips of assessors in all of the >>tates; promoting the accreditation program; maintaining liaison with applicant, candidate, and accredited agencies: and disseminating information. Q From what sources does the Commission derive its authority? The Commission was founded by, e-xisis for the benefit of. and derives its authonty from the law enforcement community. The Commission is not obligated to any governmental unit. Voluntary par ­ ticipation in the accreditation program consututes the continuing source of the Commission's accreditation authority. (accreditation) clarified personnel roles, responsibilities and requirements for moving up the ranks. President Randall Bertsch ,‘irlington County Police Beneficiary Association "^^Accreditation means to me a commit­ ment to professionalism, to universally accepted high standards and a chance to cooperate with the best people in the law enforcement field. Chief Leroy Chahley Edmonton, Alberta. Canada Q How is the Commission funded? Fees are collected from law enforcement agencies seeking accrediution. This income defrays the two major costs incurred by the Commission; on-site assessment costs ipavrnenis to assessors for their time, travel, and the like) and off-site costs (staff salaries and travel, assessor training, publication costs, etc.). In addition, support trom public and private sector sources is sought. ^ It (accreditation) gives the Chief E.xecutive Officer something tangible. You can see where you stand and where you need to be going. Chitf Ronald J. Ferrell Lebanon. Ohio Q What is the ongoing relationship of the Commission to the founding law enforcement associations? The Commission s Bylaws specify that the associations are to appoint the members of the Com ­ mission. Each appointed member must have received the unanimous endorsement of the four associations. The executive directors of the four associations serve as ex-officio advisors to the Commission. On an informal basis, the suggestions ind observations of the four associations vvill always be welcomed. ■* :■ •. -■ .. -r . • .-. • — :• V '. ;:y • V • .j ■:-wH •'V'1 •j ..-.U :yi Q UE8II0NS ABOUT THE S^TAM^i¥^A:RE>S^ Q What are the sta idards desit^ied to accomplish? The standards were developed to help lau enforcement agencies achieve the following: • Increase agency capabilities to prevent and control crime. • Enhance agency effecnveness and -•fficienc^ in the delivery of law enforcement sen- ices. • Improve cooperation and coordination with other law enforcement agencies and with other compo­ nents of the criminal justice system. • Increase citizen and staff confidence in .he coals, objectives, policies, and practices or the agency. ^Accreditation is assurance of excellence to our local governing body and the citizens we serve. In addition, we can demonstrate that we adhere to national standards, a testament to our insurability. Chief William C. WehoUi Indian Hill. Ohio Q WTiat areas do the standards cover? The standards address si.x major law entorcemem ‘opics; (1) role, responsibilities, and relationships with other agencies; (2) organization, management, and administration: (3) personnel administration; (4) law enforcement operations, operational supptirt. and traffic law enforcement; (5) prisoner and court- related seivices; and (6) auxiliary and technical sen - ices. Designed to reflect the best professional prac­ tices in each of the si.x .ircas. the standards deal w itn the “what to.” leaving the decisions o' tu” up to the agency. Q How were the standards developed and bv whom? Ir.itiaily. the standards were drafted b> staffs of the four law enforcement asscnations mentioned earlier. Each assumed responsibility for developing portions of the standards, which were then reviewed at group meetings attended by represenDtives from all the as.sociations. Proposed standards were amended, as necessary, and sent to the Commission for initial approval. The Commission-approved standards were then submitted to law enforcement agencies and indi- viduai for e.xaminauon and comment. Standards were aiso subjected to a structured field review by over 300 law enforcement agencies of vanous types and iizes in all 50 states. Field test results were reviewed bv' the four pamcipating associations. To the extent that changes in the standards were advis ­ able. thev' were forwarded to the Commission for approval. The end result of this process was promul­ gation by the Commission of more than 900 stan­ dards. Reflecting nesv '»■ improved practices, new or revised standards are _ veloped by the Commission from time to time, with the advice and counsel of agencies already accredited and of the four participat­ ing law enforcement associations. Q Must law enforcement agencies comply with all the standards? .No. First, the accreditation program is and will continue to be a voluntary one. so an agency may choo.se not to apply for accreditation. Second, those agencies that do seek accreditation are required to comply only with standards specifi­ cally applicable to them; applicability is based on agency size and the functions it performs. For e,xam- ple. the Commission has designated a number of standards as not applicable fer smaller agencies, wh>‘.:h cannot be expected to employ the range of ^^The accreditation program has airtady increased the departments productivity and professionalism. With standards that are consistent, we look forward to lowering the city’s liability and to enhanced community services as byproducts... Chief Steven R. Harris Redmond. Wishington - y . r -V '•-J •Vj '1 ■A A 'r-Ji i •j •! speciaiisis or perrorm the numoer or runctions mat larger agencies could reasonably be expected to employ and penbrm. Third, thoMi standards that ,ire appiicaoie to an agency fall into two categoncs: mandatory and non­ mandatory. Agencies must comply with all applicable mandatory standards. Howe\er. an agency need not initially comply with more than 80 percent of the applicable nonmandatory standards, although it is encouraged to comply with as many of these as possible. The agency may select the 80 percent wnh which it chooses to comply. 'As a new Chirf of Police making numerous changes^ the Commission's manual^ 'Standards for Law Enforcement Agencies,* served the department as a blueprint for our development of policy and procedures and helped ensure that ail our areas of functional responsibility were thoroughly tied together and integrated. Chief I Ret. I Philip L .-ish. Jr Staunton, Virginia Q What if an agency Is prohibited from complying with a standard? If an agency' cannot comply wim a standard bejause it is prohibited by legislation, labor agree­ ments, court orders or case law. waivers can be sought. An agency requests a waiver in writing. It must be submitted to the Commission for considera­ tion as soon as identified in the self-assessment phase of the process. Q How difficult is the task of gaining compliance with the standards? The .standards are designed so that compliance is “attainable." although it may not be an easy matter for some agencies. The standards are not considered to be an unreasonable burden on any well-managed law enforcement agency. Qa Q UESTIONS ABOUT THE P'R S' S" Is the accreditation pmgroin a voluntary one? Yes. Agencies are in no way obligated to seek accreditation. Inasmuch as accreditation is a volun­ tary program, an agency may withdraw from the program at any point in time or may suspend its accreditation activities for a specific penod of time following approval of eligibility and acceptance of the agency’s application. Moreover, the Commission neither encourages nor endorses efforts by any governmental authonty to mandate accreditation. I |B What law enforcement agencies are eligible fo^ accreditation? Eligible law enforcement agencies arc defined as (1) legally constituted governmental entities having mandated responsibilities to enforce laws and having personnel with general or special law enforcement powers; and (2) agencies providing law enforcement services whose eligibility is venfied by the Commission. "//2 my opinion, 10 years from now...it will be absolutely devastating to be a law enforcement agency in the U.S. that is not, in fact, accredited...! think that*s exactly the way it should be.'^ Chief David M. Gellatly Sx vannah. Georgia Q Who may submit an application for agency accreditation? The Commission will accept an applicauon for accreditation only if it is submitted by the law enforcement agency’s chief e.xecutive officer. If appropnate. the application should be countersigned by the chief e.xccutive officer of the agency's govern­ mental entity. The signature and countersignature • • •• Co;.: ■■• o; >. . y. ... r v! •’a VJi 1 • i .>i ii K*s I •j assure the Commission (D that the agenc\’ and us governmental unit understand all elements of the program (descnbed in informational matenals previ­ ously sent to the agent7 by the Commission) and i2) that they are willing to commit the resource^ neces- sarv for accreditation. Q How long does it take to become accredited? Generally, agencies comply with all applicable standards within 18 months to two years after the; enter the accreditation process. Q For what period is an agency accredited, and what is expected of an accredited agency? Accreditation is for a five-year period. Once accredited, agencies are expected to remain in com­ pliance with those standards under which accreditation was awarded. Accredited agencies are required to file annual reports that testify to continuing compliance. Agencies are encouraged to initiate the reaccreditation process as soon as practical, but not later than month 42 following accreditation. " Many officers participated in the accreditation process and it gave them a sense of ownership and a strong belief in themselves. Chief Ronald 51( )t)U Greeit’x. Colorado Q How many agency personnel are involved in the accreditation effort? The individual designated as the agenc, s accreditation manager will be involved throughout the accreditation period. The manager will often require secretarial and other assistance and may provide orientation and training for other agency personnel who are assigned to gather compliance documentation, to conduct different aspects of the self-assessment and cooperate with the Commission's on site assessment team. 8 Q V\ hat qualities are needed in accreditation managers? Based ■■'n the experiences of accredited agencies and those in self-assessment, accrediution managers are highly-motivated, seif-suners who have a goixl rappon with ail staff levels. Selection of the accredi­ tation manager i.s critical to success. Q \\ hat are the major steps in the accreditation pnKess? Once an agency submits a formal application tor accrediDtion. the Commission determines w hether the agency meets eligibility entena and. if so. requests that the agency complete an agency profile questionnaire. It is designed to elicit information about the agency's size. resp<')nsibilities. functions pert'ormed. organization, management, etc. This information permits the Commission to reconfirm the agency 's eligibility and to determine which standards are applicable to the agenev. Using forms and instructions supplied by the Commission, the agency conducts its own a.s.sessment to determine the extent to which it meets applicable standards and assembles the necessary proofs of compliance. The time period for completion of self-assess­ ment is tlexibie. It depends on the agency's resources, the chief e.xecutive officer, the accredita­ tion manager, and many other variables. It can take several months The important thing is to get started with the right materials and information — the Items ^ont after the initial fee payment. Then, experience >hows it takes an agency, which has assigned a full-time accreditation manager, from a year to 18 months. Upon reviewing the self-as.sessmeni repon and finding it acceptable, the Convnission sends a team of assessors to the agency to venfy its compliance with standards. This involves e.xamining the proofs of compliance that thf agency assembled during the self-assessment phase and. in keeping with the Commission's desire to maintain an open accredita­ tion process, providing agency employees and the general public an opportunity 'o comment on the agency's compliance with applicable standards through phone and personal interviews, and letters. After the Commission's staff reviews the assess­ ment team's repon, it is forwarded—along with staff recommendations —:o the Commission, which either ■ •*: -J.'U' i s ■ ‘1 i 'V. awxirds or defers accrcdiianon. If the latter, the agency is provided 'A ith an outline of the steps required to gain full compliance wnh the standards. At any point in the accreditation process, deci ­ sions by the Commission. :ts suff. and its assessors may be appealed by the agency pursuant to prtx ’e- dures established for this purpose Q Who conducts the on-site assessment? E.xperiencfcc enforcement practitioners and persons with demo>. "aied la- , enforcement knowl­ edge and experienc. ire recruited, selected, and trained by the Commission to conduct the on-site assessments. To the extent possible, assessors are assigned to assess agencies of similar sizes and types as those agencies that they have served; assessors are not assigned to an assessment within their own state. (The Commission recruits assessors continuously: experienced professionals should write lo the Ciirn- mission for information.) Q Does the agency base an opportunity to review the names and qualifications of assessors? An agency is notified in advance of the identities and backgrounds of potential assessors; the Commis­ sion accepts comments from the agency concerning potential conllicis of interests or other circumsunces indicating that an assessor should not be assigned ^Accreditation is more than a process and a set of standards—it is a statement of the importance of public service.,.The departments accreditation reflects well on the quality of its management, the petformance of its employees, and reinforces the importance of serving the community in an effective, professional, competent manner, ff City .-Uministnuor Del D. Bor^sdorf Ann Arbor. SUchigan UESTIONS ABOUT THE How much is the fee that must accompany an agency’s request for an accreditation application? The application fee is SIOO and is not refund­ able unless the agency is ruled ineligible. However, the SKX) IS credited toward payment of the total accreditation fee. Q When must an agency pay the full accreditation fc*e? When It submits the completed accreditation agreement, the agency may '•emit a check for 50'^ of the total accreditation ^ee and pav the balance prior to scheduling the on-site assessment. Or. the agency may the entire fee with the agreement and get a 5T di-^ ount. ...\ll U...rt *<y amounts to, is...using the accumulated wisdom of some of the best minds in the business to help us get our houses in order. If you look at it that way, it’s a bargain.’^ chief Gordon F. Urlacher Rochester, Sew York Q How much is the total accreditation fee? The fees are based on the total number of full­ time employees. (Fees for agencies with multiple districts, precincts, or substations could be higher. ) See schedule below: No. of Empiovccs 1 Fee !->»S5.500 (5.223)* 10-24 S.OOO (7.(300) 25-19 9.000 (8.550) , 50-199 11.500 (10.925) ' 200-499 ',4.500 (13.775) 500-999 i 000 (16.150) ' ltXX)-2999 19.C00 (18.050) 3000-up 22.000 ( 20.900) I *If louJ (ee IS paid up from, instead of one-luif witn the j^reemem ! and another half prror to tfie on-tite assessmeni. a 5% reducuoc j 15 offered. ^1-V-r*- ■ , . r -^‘1 ga -#^***^* m * •■.V/ • •iSiX:: -v>;.-. ::i I-Xi Vj •il Q UESnONS ABOUT Q VVTien does an agei-*v begin the reaccreditation process? An accredited agency may begin the rcaccrcdita- tion process with the tiling ot its lirst annual report. Q How does an agency apply for reaccreditation? An accredited agency applies for reaccreditation by executing an “Application nr Peaccreditation'- see below for more details Q VVTiat are the steps in the reaccreditation process? In addition to filing annual reports, agencies will be expected to execute an 'Application tor Reaccreditation ” as an amendment to the carrently- in-force .•\ccreditation Agreement. Before the end of month 42 Mowing accreditation, an agency' will be required file a plan for achieving reaccredita- tion and then keep the Commission advised ot progress at months 45. 48. and 51. The on-site assessment will be conducted thereafter, followed by preseiiU.i«'n of the agency before month 60. This help; msuie continuous accrediution. Q How much is the fee? The reaccreditation fee structure has been established by the Commission based on the accreditation fee with a series of discounts. (The accreditation fee schedule is on page 11.) A variety of payment schedules and discounts, beginning as early as the first year of accreditation. arc offered to provide as many options as possible for the convenience of the agency The discount is from the reaccreditanon fee schedule in eftect at the time a decision is made to seek reaccrediuition. ,A descnpiion follows; • .\ payment decision in year 1 ol accreditation —by the 13th month after an agency is accredited — Full payment in year 1 —a 20discount — Four equal payments divided over four years-a 15% discount • \ pasment decision in year 2 by the 25th month — Full payment in year 2-a 15% discount — Three equal payments divided over three vears—a 10% discount • A payment decision in year 3 —by the 37th month — Full payment in year 3 —a 10% discount — Two equal paymenLs divided over two years— a 5% discount • .A payment decision in year 4 —by the 49th month — Fail pavment in year 4 —a 5% discount - Two equal payments—the second payment prior to the on-site assessment—no discount WTiat role does an accredited agency’s annual report play in reaccreditation? The reaccreditation annual repon is the Com- mi>oon s continuing assurance that the agency is maintamins its accredited status, its activities are in accord with the applicable accreditation standards, and it is fulfilling reaccreditation requirements. " We will continue to look at better ways. We are not going to sit on our laurels.. .this is an ongoing process. Cyrus L. Brooks Ciry Manager Wilson. Sorxh Carolina a:-**• :• Q Does reaccreditation require higher levels of compliance with standards? Yes. reaccreditation requires a higher Ie'.el or compliance with nonmandator>- standards. Initial accreditation requires compliance with or nonmandatory standards. The Commission will require increasing levels of compliance as follows: First Reaccrediiation (85%); Second Reaccredita- tion (90%) and Third and Subsequent Reaccreditations (95%). Agencies are, of course, expected to come into compliance with all applicable mandatory standards —including new ones enacted by the Commission following accreditation or the previous reaccreditation. Q What is required during the on-site assessment? The reaccreditaiivin on-sitc assessment will resemble the initial accreditation in terms of start­ ing and length of time on site. The scope of the on-site assessment will be quite different. There will be less emphasis upon e.xamining written documentation. Emphasis areas will include e.xamining agency goals and objectives as well as its role with the community' it serx'es and the criminal justice system of which it is a part. Q How is reaccreditation determined? Reaccreditation is determined by the Commission in a manner similar to initial accreditation. The assessing team leader's rcpon is submitted to a commince of the Commission at one of its regularly scheduled meetings. Following an examination by the committee, a recommendation is made to the full Commission to award reaccreditation or to defer rcaccrcditation until cer­ tain actions are taken. An affirmative vote of the Commission extends accreditation for an additional five years. '.wr ^One of the beauties of accreditation is that it is for five years, and during that time Ke have to document that we are keeping up. Also, the Commission will be keeping us up to date with new standards...and we can make changes as we go along. Chief Clinton Chafin Fulton County. Georgia Q Can reaccreditation be denied? The Commission has established four accredita­ tion statu.ses that may be invoked at the time of reaccreditation: • Accredited. • Accredited-with-a-fime-limit—to remedy deficiencies by pursuing a plan of action filed with the Commission; .Accreditation Suspended —the agency has not achieved compliance vvith applicable standards but could regain accredited status by pursuing a plan of action; and Accreditation Revoked—the agency is regarded as no longer accredited. Of course, any agency may withdraw from the program at any time. '' The accreditation process is ongoing. We will continue to keep abreast of the latest law enforcement practices by monitoring changes in standards and modifying our policies and practices as necessary to remain accredited. Chief James M. O'Dell Kettering, Ohio ,•-•'r.-.u;.— V. • • 'UUMMINd MDIWI me H I N 1-: 1 1 r s I What are the benefits of accreditation I and reaccreditation to tlie agency and * the community served? .iiionwide recognilinn of professional cxccll ?<cc. oiiiinued growth and improvement, immunity understanding and support. Miployee confidence; esprit. late and local government officials’ confidence. •atc-of-thc*art, impartial guidelines for evaluation. <id change, when necessary. loaciive management systems; policies and Miccdures docuincnied. lability insurance costs contained or decreased. iahility litigation deterred. oordination with neighboring agencies and other ms of the criminal justice system. ccess to the latest law enforcement practices. We were convinced that a formal •gram that identified all essential HeieSt procedures, and programs, and mired that they be put in writing, aid he beneficial... It also nonstrates to insurance underwriters •t we should be granted coverage at tsonable premiums. City Manager James D. Jester Iniiian Hill. Ohio rhe accreditation process offers more hope d security for professional treatment to the eet cop than anything existing today. It tmises proper management techniques, equate training, and fair discipline tides, it offers hope for true profession- sm within law ertforcemenl.^9 Sergeant CUtrence £ Jones, Jr. Amarillo, Te.xas MNMMliMIUM UH HbMIUM IMIMNII Ull UW ENHUtCHAENT MBICIES, WC. Gerald t. Williams Oiirirrmin Chicr or IVhce Aurora, Colutjdii John i tkmd III County Manager Durham, North Carnlnu Johnny Mack iirimn Sheriff of Cirecnvillr Couniy Gteenville. South Caiolm.i Derrcll R Carnes Esecuti\e Director (Ret ) Georgia POST Council Dccalur. Georgia Catole CaiiKnict Maticetpa County Suiicivicoi Phoenis, Arizona Sylvester Daughtry Chief of Dilice Greenshoru, North Carolina Donald V Doy le Stale Senaior SiiHU City, Iowa John F Duffy Slieriff of San Diego C>Hiniy San Diego, California Richard I. Germond Sheriff of lenawce Couniy Adrian, Michigan lames I Fyfe I'tufcssor The American Universily >k^shinglan. DC Sicven R. Harris Chief of Ikilice RedriKind, Wishingion Joan llensler City Council Member fRet) Rocheslci, New- York William I- Kirchholf City Manager Arlington, Teus Colonel Robert W. landon Chief Adminisiralor (Ret ) MonUna Highway Dilrol Helena, Montana Sam tynn Chief of Mice Sr Petersburg, Florida The ilonotahle Donald L Manford Judge, Missouri Court of Ap(>cjls Kansas Cily, Mtssourl Michael D Muth Second Vice Chairman Naiional Troopers Coalition tarPlaU, Maryland Ronald D Nelson Chief of Mice Berkeley, California CTurles C Plummer Sheriff of Alameda Couniy OaklamI, California Charles D Reynolds Chief of lYilice Doser, New Hampshire Thomas S While, Jr Vice President (Ret ) BriMol Myers Co New York, New York Kcnnelli H Medeiros F.xccuiive Director ” / believe that we now have not just a process or a program, but a movement... that will make law enforcement better than ever before... I foresee the day when mayors, governors and city councils will he asking the question of police executives, *ls your agency an accredited agency?* / foresee the day when businesses that contemplate moving from one location to another are asked the question, *Does that city have an accredited police department?* 99 discover and develop Ihe poterUial of Ikt department*s staff. The training and sel, discipline.. .proved to be an added bonus,, Chief Fred Sloe* mimette. Him Former Chief Lee P. Brown Houston, Te.xas Copyright 1984, Contmitiion on Ai t rrdihilum for law Fjifnrirmenl Agtncttt, hr We have not reached the end of a proce but rather are at the beginning of a new i in which this agenry can improve anddevet in all areas of law enforcement operations Sheriff Nick Navu Broward County, Floi □ Yes, please tend me an AppUcMkM ftKkat* 0 SIOOjOO to include; • A descriptive and instnidional letler; applicalioii linm: •ccrediMkia »i (lo be sigiKd); AccredHatiott Ptvg am Book: Sumdanb for law Agencies: a tws> year subscription to the Commission'i newsiciicr and I' invoice for die accrediulion fce. Ddal S. D Yes. J vrani to order (he Jutlowing; • Suuuianb Jktr Law E/^finremenl Agencies—The Carombskin't Sttndanis lixise icaf Sundards Manual (Quantity) O SISOO each Ibtal I ________Three-rini binder (Quanliiy) O $300 each HiUl % ________TWi> year Update Service ((juamiiy) O SKJOO each for 2 yean Total t (if ordered at later dale SI300) • Accreditation Program Book (APB)—The principal source of informati the program and process. ________APB O SROO each (SSiJO if in mU uscumcm and beyon (Quantity) Iblal i • Acereditatian Prttgram Over\iew (AIV)—Concise deictiplhM. Single copy FRF.E ________APO a $ 75 each lUal 1 (Quantity) • Self assessment Manutd (S.iM)—A new (I9U) cdhiui of the SAM | guidance to Ihe most impoitanl aspect of the pracen of inhial acciediuiion-ihe agency's seirastctsmem. ________SAM 9 SI2.S0 each (S9I» seir asscuMiM and beyond) (Quantity) Ibial $ • The Suutdanis Manual on Ofjfo—Standards aie on lltnt SI* inch. • density, douMe tided dUks which arc IBM PC compalMc «sii« Wn An ASCII version also is available. Please specif vcflion piefcicnt -------------Slandaidi disks O SSSOO/set ($2900 sdr atwtMicnl and ((^taniily) Hinl $ • Standard Titles on Disk —This disk in above venioos has abbfcvialed all standards. -------------'nile disk & $2900 ($1900 self asseumcal and beyond) (Quantity) 1Ual $ Ibial Older $ □ Enclosed U our check or money order made payable to Ihe Commissi on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies, Inc. □ Please invoice Purchase Order#_____________________ Name; _________________________________________________ TTUe and Agency: Street: _________ OHGNa CITYrf ORONO Post Office Box 66«Cry'’Uj Bay, MinneaoU 55323 • Munidjml OfBcoi On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka November 15, 1990 Commissioner Tad Jude Hennepin county Government Center Minneapolis, MN 55487 Subject: 1991 Hennepin County Budget Dear Commissioner Jude, on behalf of the Orono City Council I am writing to express our concern as to the significant tax increase proposed by the county for 1991. We realize that you, just as habeen faced with significant shifts from the Federal and ftate to the ’Mai level In addition you have been given Federal and State n«literiv;r which you h/ve little and Services which make up 40% of the budget. Health at 20% and criminal justice making up a significant portion of the balance. In our telephone discussion of November 13, 1990 y°“ indicated you had already made budget cuts which reduce e increase from 14.3% to 10.9%. We appreciate your efforts and encourage a continued attitude of fiscal prudence. We additionally request you, as full time salaried Commissioners, not take additional per diem payments boards OT^hich you serve, particularily if they relate to your position as a Commissioner. Thank you for your consideration and I would also commend Tom Falstad, Hennepin County’s considerate assistance in answering ray questions on November 14th. ---------- ardson City Administrator Mayor and City CouncilHarriet Smith, 370 North Arm Lane, Mound 55364 Tom Falstad, Budget Director, Hennepin County ■UIUMNG a ZONING • 473>73ST AMMNG administration 4 FINANCE - 473-735i FAX-47M510 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-73» >r..; •^>':.- ..-^,‘,-Ai.- ’Xi '■- .,-' .u4. V§^^1t s-.-vs^:^ ... I i.'-.'... ^^..V,V,4/{ '-■ ages,. ? . . . -, , i-: 10490.7 CITY OF ORONO IMVBSTMEirr TWUISJICTIOHS - BLKCTRONIC MIBB TRAMSPBRS OCTOBBR 4 TO NOVBMBBH 21, 1990 DATE TRANSFER FOR FROM TO AMOUNT 10/10/90 Proccsds of FNMA Repurchase Agreeeot Net of Coueccial Paper Purchased Marquette Bank 1st Bank Lakes $ 28,790.10 10/15/90 Interest Recei* on Certificate o posit Daln Bosworth 1st Bank Lakes 4,250.00 10/19/90 Interest Received on Fed Fare Credit Bank Bonds 1st Bank Mpls 1st Bank Lakes 8,940.00 10/26/90 Proceeds of FNMA Repurchase Agreeaent Net of Commercial Paper and Certificate of Deposit Purchased Marquette Bank 1st Bank Lakes 58,841.99 11/C 2/90 Interest Received on Fed Farm Credit Bank Bonds Marquette Bank 1st Bank Lakes 13,875.00 ll/H-90 Proceeds of Commercial Paper Marquette Net of Commercial Paper Purchased Bank 1st Bank Lakes 973.42 11/14/90 Proceeds of Commercial Paper Daln Bosworth Net of Commercial Paper Purchased 1st Bank Lakes 150,452.08 ■1 ‘ i '■ 1 « 1 I CITY OP OBOHO SOMHART OP RBCBXPT6, DISBORSEKBNTS AND BALANCES POR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 BBGZimilNS 1/1/90 RECEIPTS TOTAL BUDGET (C) 1990 TRANSP IN INVEST SOLD DISBOR TOTAL BUDGET (C) 1990 « OP TRANSP INVEST PORCH ENDING 9/30/90 ZNVS8TNB1IT WVm BALANCE CASH BALANCE 1/1/90 CASH BALANCE 9/30/90 INVEST BALANCE Genaral 810,7441,954,039 (b) 2,924,010 2,066,514 2,924,010 70.71 698,269 Parka 143,469 20,940 20,300 0 680 164,409 CDOB 0 0 -0 -0 ■qnlp Outlay 260,672 20,240 83,560 122,219 106,100 115.21 158,693 Bldy Cap ontly 2,196,39B 151,862 30,000 151,319 -2,196,941 Nm Bt Aid Cona 3,519 0 -5,587 -(2,068) far Xapr Bov 636,903 57,772 -15,696 -678,979 SwrHltr Cona B9 1,605,551 105,057 -243,455 -1,467,153 lap Bead 66-76 542,039 51,405 79,500 164,273 164,310 100.ot 429,171 lap Bead BO 471,927 78,095 117,650 116,156 115,960 100.2%433,866 lap Bond B2 145,120 11,027 14,000 40,342 40,360 100.0%115,805 lap Bond BS 156,989 48,235 90,780 26,160 105,400 26.7%177,064 BHr-Wtr Bond 89 498,193 85,451 36,250 129,231 130,860 454,413 Matar Op 120,820 135,347 166,900 118,273 188,210 62.8%137,894 Bawar Op 582,014 509,788 479,040 445,390 392,050 113.6%646,412 Bolf Oouraa Op 1,137 146,094 115,800 (a)104,965 103,110 (a) 101.8%42,266 Pooled Inv Trust Pond 7,914,399(7,914,3991 529,513 19,078,544 529,513 18,866,694(7,702,549) 7,702,549 TOTALS 7,914,399 261,096 3,904,865 4,157,790 0 19,078,5444,281,093 4,271,050 0 18,866,694 96,718 7,702,549 TOTALB LST YR 9,514,024 98,5893,702,454 3,868,4704,688,32211,042,9283,683,394 3,942,500 4,688,32211,104,663 55,914 5,575,759 Cm«AL Ptm taNNAKT - 1990t TOTAL 1990 CASH t INVESTMENT TO 9/30/90 97,799,267 t OP ... a— ----------------B0D6ET BUDGET Taaaa 779,7511,604,460 48.6% Lieaaaaa a Pamlta 102,662 118,500 86.6% latarpav. Bavaaaa . 99,007 154,700 64.0% Chfs far Barr - >— - 501,313 723,450 80.4% 70,163 115,500 67.7% lat. oa iBvaat.- 146,740 195,000 75.3% Tran. Pr otbar Puada 0 0 Othar 13,941 12,400 112.4%ii1,001,577 2,924,010 61.6% MOTE (a) Golf oparating fund budgat doaa net locluda amounts for purchaaaa for raaala or aalaa tax eollaetad/raolttad. Tha racalpta budget projects gross profit - not total racalpta. NOTE (b) Genaral fund ravanuas racordad will not oqoal racalpta collected due to receivables billed In other accounting parlods and non-ravenue racalpta. NOTE (c) Budgat aaooBtB locluda achadulad tranafora, do not Inclndo fund balance uses or additions. '' > i H LIST OF LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR MEETING OF November 26, 1990 Spetic System Installers License - Duane Ritter Exc. 7120 Vernon Street Rockford, MN 55373 1991 On Sale Non-Intoxicatiny Malt Liquor - Orono Golf 1991 Liquor License Renewal - Navarre Liquor Steven Corl 3421 Shoreline Drive 1991 Liquor License Renewal - Jimmies Lounge ‘Jimmie Holtz 3380 Shoreline Drive - 1991 t^lub License Renewal - Woodhill Country Club "Barn 200 Woodhill Road . it: d^O -'a .- CITY USE ONLY ORONO Cryaul Bay. Minnoaota 55323 building & ZONING - 473-7357 assessing SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERS LICENSE APPLICATION 1 questions raust be answered. License fee, bond, certificate iLurance, and evidence of MPCA Certxrication or Horae Sewage featment Workshop attendance raust accompany this application. ,11 aoplications are subject ten (10) day approval period. 1. Business or trade name ^^- - - - - 2. Business address 7 ?^ 3. Business phone Residence phone 4. Name of applicant^i corapai^ irepresentative holding MPCA certification - - - - - --- - - - - - - - -— 5. Type of certification held: Installer - - - Pumper Site evaluator _ _System designer /^}<? Is this a Provisional Certificate? _ _ _ Certificate No./ j/J 6. If no Certificate is held, provide evidence of attendance at one of the On-Site Sewage Treatment Workshops t .d immediately prior to the current construction season. 7. Have you ever held a Septic System Installer lice: ?e in Orono beforeMost recent year ^ 8. Have you ever had a license revoked? )^C When? - - - - - Where? _ _ _ §. Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yes_ _ _ No- - - - - l6~. Do you pump out septic tanks? Yes_ _ _ QJ^ 3. 4. SUBMITTALS REQUIRED: 0^ 1. $25.00 license application ! 2. $2000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Orono as obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accepted. ^ $10-50-100,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance. ty.7.^/ Copy of current MPCA Certificate or evidence of attendende at On-Site Sewage Treatment Workshop held immediately prior to current construction season, ?/ LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED. List persons other than applicant who are authorized by you to apply for permits under your license - - --- - - - - - - - --- - - - - The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of Orono, Minnesota, for license to install and repair septic systems, and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws, of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinances,of the City of Date Applicants Signature St ) . ® recommendation ^pprov^ Reas, .-k for denial: Denial Date //-/7- JO City Council Action Date license mailed Date Approved Denied r. A RESOLUTION GRANTING GAMBLING PERMIT FOR NAVARRE LANES LOCATED AT 3525 SHORELINE DRIVE BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Orono agrees to approve the gambling permit application for the Northwest Tonka Lions Club for operations at Navarre Lanes, 3525 Shoreline Drive. The above listed resolution was moved by __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ and duly seconded by The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative; The following CoanciImembers voted in the negative; 1990. The above resolution was duly adopted on November 26, ATTEST; James R. Grabek, Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk mmmm LG214 19/5/aoi Minnesota Lawful Gambling Premise Permit Application • Part 1 ’ BOARD USE ONXY CHECK _ IMTULS. DATE___ Organization Information Legal Name of Organization / Business Address O# Orgwiization - Street or P 0 Box (Do not use address of gambling manager) /^./O _________________________ QHy Stale up t;ooB y ixiuniy Business phone number iJ^u/n ______________Ua/. y^xM/9^xJ Name of chief executive olfaer (cannot be gambling manager) Tide Business phone number tg. c IA ^ a V “It_______ i- fir, Address of chief executive officer - Street or P O Box Cit^ State Zip Code __________/^aJ.____ County Type of Hgplicxtion Glut of PremlM Permit □ Class A — Bingo, Raffles. Paddlewheels. Tipboards. Pull-tabs 0^ Class B — Raffles, Paddlewheels, Tipboards, Pull-tabs □ Class C — Bingo only □ Class 0 — Ragles only 7ft# Class of pnmisa parmit must ba raflaetad by class of Iha organization llcanaa. Bingo Occaelone If A OT C. fill In dsyo uid beginning end ending hours of bingo occaslone: No more »Naa eceen bingo occesione mey be conducted by en orglBiMtlBB week. Beglnnlne/Ending Hours Beginning/Ending Hours Oay Beginning /Ending Hours -to_ _to. _to_ to_ w- ■ r’ "r 1“ -—r —-.V'- ' ..... . If Binge win net be eendectod. check beie^ Stotns of Premise Permit • cheek one: 'V-' V, □ New premiM — Fil in but organization premise permit number _________ Q^enewal of existing premise permit — Rll in complete premise permit number . □ Previousijr expired premise permit — Fill in complete premise permit number^ ■-J'C’-' ■ V ^ Mr OT- OT- y L0ai4 Minnesota Lctwjiil Gambling Premise Permit Application - Part 2 Gambling Premises Information Naim of aatabiiafwnant wihaio gambling wHI ba conductad Sbaat Address (do not use a post office box number) 32SiS ________________________ la the pramiiM locaiad within oiy iimita? G no City and County whara gambling piamisaf is locaiad OR Township and County where gambling premises is located it outside of dty limits 1 * /fe/u/U/Af/U Nams and Adctess of Legal burner of Prsmtses City State Zip Code Does tw organisation own the buildng where tfte gambling will be conducted? G TES (3^NO NOTE: Organizations may not pay themsalvas rent if they own the building or have a holding company. A letter must be sub- mHtad showing rant paymants as zaro from gambling funds if the organization's holding company owns the premises. The tattar must ba signad by tha chief axacutive officer.) If NO. attach the following; * a copy of the lease with terms for one year. * a copy of a sketch of the floor pian with dimensions, showing what portion is being leased. A lease and sketch are not required for Class 0 applicantions. Rant: For gambling with bingo For gambling without bingo $ ^ Total square iootage leased ______ Total square footage leased Address of storege space of gambling equipment Address City ^5^7 Coynmk./iSc State nttC Zip code Bank Information (eece pemwuee gamming pnmimt muat neve e eppereie ehiekmg aeeount) BenkNeme Benk Address Bank Account Number Address Ci^ Suie Zip Code Meme, adbhess . and ade ot persons Muthorutd to vgn chocks and maka daposits and wiMrawafs. Name Address Titfe / ^ iSjfJ ^ TkJkJAjfi T>?aJa ‘7j>y2ax/|g - . / h£A95/r5 J LCai4 Minnesota Lawjul Cambling Premise Permit Application - Part 3 fhwbjoln offic«r». th« board or agants of tha board, or thacommissionar of ravanua or public or aganis of tha oommiasionara. may antar tha pramisas to anforoa tha law. BbBk'RccoftfslnformatloB ^ • ’"Tha board is authorizad to inst^ tha bank racords of tha gamolmg account whanavar nacassary to fulfill ........ - ---------- raquiramants of currarrt gambling rulas and law. I dadara that: I hava raad this application and all information submittad to tha board; All infomtation is tnia, aocurata and complata; An othar raquirad information has baan fully disdosad; I am tha chiafaiacuthraofficar of tha organization: . ^ ^ i I assuma fun rasponsibility for tha fair and lawful gambling and rulas of tha board and agraa. if Icansad. to abida by thosa laws and rulas. induding amandmants to tham; ^ A mambarship nst of tha organization will ba availabla within savan days altar it is raquastad by tha toard. Any changas in application information will ba submitted to the board and local government within 10 A*«T^nlTtot^*iiI^ submittad to tha board within 15 days of tha tarminaton of all prarnisa Faiiura to provida raquirad information or providing falsa information may rasult in tha danial or ravocaton of tha lioansa. 1. Tha city •must sign if tha gambling pramisas is locatad within city limits. Township: By signatura balow, tha townsh^ acknowladgas that tha organization is applying for a promises permit within CNy* or County**Township**- Cky or County Nima Township Nama ■ V -• ~ ^-Signaaifa of parson roooiving appScatnn ■ -r-— ,, - Signaiurs of parson .'^vinoapplieaiion :TMa - ' V : ^ - .i: Oats RaoaivaO Parson dslivarirv^ appiealQn lo tooai goiwiw^i Oaia . - , ■ 1 ff 'tG' ^0 '• '? 1.' • ^ St* ‘ ' is township: □ Orgwszad” □ Unorgaoizad - • J *1 1 □ Uninoorjmladvcflat.. ^ W County Road B V Rosavilla. MN55113 .... -vV-: Interoffice Memo Date: November 21, 1990 To: City Administrator Mark Bernhardson From: Police Chief Melvin Kilbo Re: 1991 On Sale - Non_Intoxieating Malt Liquor Orono Golf Course This Department has reviewed all files concerning the above establishment. Based on a review of any files, I would recommend issuance of liq’ior license to this establishment. Interoffice Memo Date:November 21,1990 To:City Administrator Mark Bernhardson From:Police Chief Melvin Kilbo Re:19v . Liquor License Renewal Navarre Liquor This Department has reviewed all files concerning the e establishment. Based on a review of any files, I wou recommend issuance of liquor license to this establishment. Interoffice Memo Date: November 21, 1990 To: City Administrator Mark Bernhardson From: Police Chief Melvin Kilbo Re: 1991 On Sale - Non_Intoxicatinc Malt Liquor Orono Golf Course This Department has reviewed all files concerning the above establishment. Based on a review of any files, I would recommend issuance of liquor license to this establishment. Date: To: From: Re: Interoffice Memo November 21, 1990 City Administrator Mark Bernhardson Police Chief Melvin Kilbo 1991 Liquor License Renewal Woodhill Country Club This Department has reviewed all files concerning the above establishment. Based on a review of any files, I would recommend issuance of liquor license to this establishment. Interoffice Memo Date: November 21. 1990 To: City Administrator Mark Bernhardson From: Police Chief Melvin Kilbo Re: 1991 Liquor License Renewal Jimmies Lounge This Department has reviewed all files concerning the above establishment. Based on a review of any files, I would recommend issuance of liquor license to this establishment. *• ^ •r.y U/11/90 PR: CB PRREGOR 11/11/90 PR: C8 PRREGOR YTD NAME DPT GROSS ACKERMAN. ALBERT J 13 206.25 ANDERSEN. PHYLLIS M 13 97.50 ANDERSEN. WILBUR F 13 , ANDERSON. BRUCE L 31 38261.02 BERQ, VERNICE J 13 , BERNHARDSON. MARK E 12 51357.52 BERNHAROSON. MARK E 12 53578.88 BOBZIEN. SUE A 31 21435.22 BOSMA. JAMIE L ^ 12 13872.18 BRINKHAUS. JOHN F 42 33081.91 BUTLER. MARY C 13 102.50 CHESWICK. GARY B 31 34135.59 CHRISTIANSON. SALLY 31 ^9^3 84 CORNICK. JAMES L 31 ^530.65 OEMBOUSKI. JAY C 31 15651.08 DICKEY. NORMA JEAN 13 187 DRUMMOND. PATRICIA 13 177 EISINGER. RUTH D 13 205 EKEBERG. ELIZABETH J 13 175 ELLIOTT. VALERIA M 13 177 ENGLISH III. IRVING 31 39099 ERICKSON. KURT R 31 33432 ERICSON. BARBARA E 13 . f FERRIL. ELEANOR L 13 FINKELSTEIN. DOROTHY 13 ^.,187 ^0 FISCHENICH. DAN T 31 33395 FRITZLER. JOHN M 31 33606 QAOBAW. ARLISS A 13 187 QAFFRON. MICHAEL P 33 30764.86 GARCIA. BARBARA 13 172.50 GARLOCK. RUTH 13 102 QASCH. MARJORIE 13 187 QERHARDSON. JOHN R 42 GREGORY. JAMES D 42 31088 QUIMOND. SHARON 13 187 HALLIN. DOROTHY M 12 26499 HANSEN. STEVEN C 42 25502 HANSING. CAROL J 31 12189 JOHNSON. BRADLEY P 31 34985 JOHNSON. JAN 13 167 JOSTROM. FOREST J 93 2365 KARNITZ. RICKY D 31 7145.29 KILBO. MELVIN H 31 45143.44 KNUTSON. CHARLOTTE A 15 21173.03 KUEHN. THOMAS M 15 *|993.94 MABUSTH. JEANNE A 33 38528.81 MADDEN. ROSE 13 197.50 CURRENT GROSS 50 50 00 00 50 26 69 27 55 50 50 00 .69 25 .50 .62 .48 .79 .93 .50 .54 115. 97 . 105. 1596 97. 350. 2221. 921. 523. 1464. 102. 1468 . 199 1744. 1027 102 . 102. 117. 95 92 1424. 1408 17. 117 102 1668 1396 102 1338 172 102 115 1760 1442 102 1153 1200 499 1492 167 45 445 1964 921 1870 1878 107 50 50 00 84 50 00 36 84 37 .32 .50 .00 .20 .37 68 .50 .50 .50 00 50 36 . 48 .50 50 .50 .42 . 17 50 72 .50 .50 .50 .80 .41 .50 .12 .71 55 . 11 .50 .13 .68 40 .82 . 89 .48 .50 NAME ‘DPT YTD GROSS CURRENT GROSS MORAN. MARK F 31 312St.93 1337.28 MOROWCZYNSKI. JAMES 31 39162.50 ~ 1408.48 NAAB, THERESA L 12 21651.26 1137.90 NELSON. DAVID D 35 1935.45 234.6C OAS, DANIEL 0 93 1179.53 55.13 OBERAIGNER. SCOTT Q 42 1270.67 852.34 OBRIEN, RANDY L 92 24280.76 978.00 OLSON, BARBARA 13 167.50 167.50 OMAN, LYLE E 33 28097.19 1271.76 PALMER, GREGORY A 42 12139.15 807.89 PEASLEY. CHRISTINE 13 195 00 117.50 PLATTETER, MARNI 13 112.50 112.50 POWELL. LOU ANN 13 112.75 112.75 QUAST, WAYNE A 92 30481.35 1356.19 RATHBUN, BARRY J 92 25440.09 1528.66 RAUSCHENDORFER. DORO 13 187.50 102.50 SCHEFFLER. LAURIE K 12 5036.67 459.00 SHEMANEK. JOYCE 13 95.00 95.00 SIFORD, RUBY 13 205.00 117.50 SKREEN. DALE S 42 25406.60 1155.94 STEFFENHAGEN. RONALD 93 2S534.55 1154.64 STEVENS. BETTY G 93 2508.00 30.25 STUBBS. CHERRY C 13 192.50 192.50 THOMTON, MARK R 31 32627.80 1392.04 TOMCHECK, LAWRENCE F 31 34907.60 1394.63 TOMCZYK. MARK W 31 33175.76 1452.50 TOWARD. HELEN W 13 100.00 100.00 TURNHAM. KENNETH 13 228.25 129.25 VANG. BRUCE L 33 23574 00 1095.52 VEE. LINDA S 12 11465.11 790.96 WALSH. KEVIN L 35 4413.78 180.27 WALTERS. LINDA G 15 20629.00 841.54 WECKMAN. STEPHEN J 33 6866.00 640.00 58,165.23 rvr? \ ) • 1990 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO DATE C^-lchcR^ Cjxsxki CHECK KEGISTEII AMOUNT HC8742 HC8742 HC8742 HC8742 HC8742 HC8742 HC8742 HC8742 HC8742 HC8742 MC8742 HC8742 HC8742 HC8742 HC8742 HC8742 HC8744 HC8744 HC8745 HC8746 HC8746 HC8746 HC8746 HC8746 HC8748 HC8748 HC8748 HC8748 HC8748 HC8748 MC8748 HC8748 HCS748 HC8748 HC8748 HC8748 HC8748 HC8748 MC8748 HC8748 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/9C 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 334 7 3 267 14 53 111 5 21 518 15 700 60 179 126 114 2.536 79 50 51 51 36 04 82 92 16 29 24 83 90 82 90 98 57 101 28 151 92 253 20 22 50 22 50 10 3 34 249 1,239 1.535 361 7 2 245 18 53 111 6 20 500 11 443 99 104 210 132 2,328 00 00 00 00 00 00 68 20 67 89 00 .96 . 72 .46 .03 .19 .37 .22 .15 .00 .70 .73 97 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST VENDOR NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL POSTMASTER POSTMASTER POSTMASTER COMM REV SALES TAX COMM REV SALES TAX COMM REV SALES TAX COMM REV SALES TAX COMM REV SALES TAX 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL ITEM DESCRIPTION FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA 10-2-90 10-2-90 10-2-90 10-2-90 10-2-90 10-2-90 10-2-90 10-2-90 10-2-90 10-2-90 10-2-90 10-2-90 10-2-90 10-2-90 10-2-90 10-2-90 3RD OTR SW/WR 3RD OTR SW/WR POSTAGE SEPT TAX CULVERT SEPT SALES TAX SEPT TAX METERS SEPT TAX WATER SEPT SALES TAX FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA 10-14-90 10-14-90 10-14-90 10-14-90 10-14-90 10-14-90 10-14-90 10-14-90 10-14-90 10-14-90 10-14-90 10-14-90 10-14-90 10-14-90 10-14-90 10-14-90 ACCOUNT NO INV 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 72- 4142 73- 4142 74- 4142 -039-12 -040-13 -059-14 -089-15 -099-17 -111-31 -115-31 -121-31 -128-31 -174-33 -185-35 -249-42 -290-61 -549-91 -569-92 -590-93 72- 4321-549-91 73- 4321-569-92 01-4321-040-13 01-2222-000-00 01-3500-000-00 72-2222-000-00 72-2222-000-00 74-2222-000-00 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 01-414' 01-414. 01-4142 72- 4142 73- 4142 74- 4142 039- 12 040- 13 059-14 089-15 •C99-17 111-31 115-31 121-31 •128-31 -174-33 -185-35 -249-42 -290-81 -549-91 -569-92 -590-93 10-31-00 PAQC 1 • P.O • MESSAGE MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL •••-CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL •••-CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL •••-CKS r o 1990 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO DATE HC8750 HC87S1 HC8752 HC8753 HC8753 HC8753 HC8753 HC8753 HC8753 HC8753 HC8754 HC8755 HC8756 11/08/90% 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 AMOUNT CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 14.00 14 00 475 63 475 63 900 00 900.00 1,096 90- 1,096 90 109 109 109 422 320 1.071 60 60 60 00 60 40 9 00 9 00 20 00 20.00 22 50 22.50 1ST NATL POSTMASTER POSTMASTER MED CNTR MED CTR MED CNTR MED CTR MED CTR MED CTR MED CTR GOLDEN VALLEY CC ST MN POSTMASTER MEDCR 10-14-90 POSTAGE POSTAGE OCT INS OCT INS OCT INS OCT INS OCT INS OCT INS OCT INS MTG LICENSE POSTAGE ACCOUNT NO INV 01-4142-020-11 01-4321-039-12 01-1262-000-00 01-4151-039-12 01-4151-039-12 01-4151-039-12 01-4151-069-15 01-4151-129-31 01-4151-174-33 01-4151-249-42 Cl-4356-129-31 01-4383-174-33 01-4321-040-13 10-31-80 PAGE 2 • P.O • MESSAGE MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL HC8757 11/08/90 40 28 40.28 • MTKA BOAT RENT BOAT RENTAL 01-4331-174-33 MANUAL HC8758 11/08/90 2 93 ORONO PETTY CASH 01-4210-020-11 MANUAL HC8758 11/08/90 30 09 ORONO PETTY CASH 01-4210-040-13 MANUAL HCS758 11/08/90 9 98 ORONO PETTY CASH 01-4210-129-31 MANUAL HC8758 11/08/90 03 ORONO PETTY CASH 01-4321-039-12 MANUAL HC8758 11/08/90 1.85 ORONO PETTY CASH Cl-4321-129-31 MANUAL HC8758 11/08/90 6 50 ORONO PETTY CASH 01-4381-129-31 MANUAL HC8758 11/08/90 24 63 ORONO PETTY CASH 01-4382-039-12 MANUAL HC8758 11/08/90 8 38 ORONO PETTY CASH 01-4382-040-13 MANUAL HC8758 11/08/90 5.00 89 39 • ORONO PETTY CASH 01-4383-039-12 MANUAL •**-CKS HC8760 11/08/90 319 55 1ST NATL FICA 10-30-90 01-4142-039-12 MANUAL HC8760 11/08/90 31 30 1ST NATL FICA 10-30-90 01-4142-040-13 MANUAL HC8760 11/08/90 2 11 1ST NATL FICA 10-30-90 01-4142-059-14 MANUAL HC8760 11/08/90 256.08 1ST NATL FICA 10-30-90 01-4142-069-15 MANUAL HC8760 11/08/90 18.09 1ST NATL FICA 10-30-90 01-4142-099-17 MANUAL HC8760 11/08/90 53.65 1ST NATL FICA 10-30-90 01-4142-111-31 MANUAL HC8760 11/08/90 111 97 1ST NATL FICA 10-30-90 01-4142-115-31 MANUAL HC8760 11/08/90 6.09 1ST NATL FICA 10-30-90 01-4142-121-31 MANUAL HCI760 11/08/90 20 41 1ST NATL FICA 10-30-90 01-4142-126-31 MANUAL HCI760 11/08/90 493.64 1ST NATL FICA 10-30-90 01-4142-174-33 MANUAL HC876Q 11/08/90 14.39 1ST NATL FICA 10-30-90 01-4142-185-35 MANUAL o 1990 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE CHECK REGISTER 10-31-90 PAGE AMOUNT HCI760 HCS760 HCS790 HCt790 HCI760 11/01/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 572.75 38.19 134.91 167.60 112.87 353 60 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV 1ST NATL FICA 10-30-90 01-4142-249-421STNATLFICA10-30-90 01-4142-290-611STNATLFICA10-30-90 72-4142-549-911STNATL FICA 10-30-90 73-4142-569-921STNATL FICA 10-30-90 74-4142-590-93 NANUAL MANUAL MANUAL 8.612 803657 1,599 33 01 12 58 FUND FUND FUND FUND 01 72 73 74 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL GENERAL FUND WATER OPERATING FUND SEWER OPERATING FUND GOLF COURSE OPERATING FD -CK6 11.872 04 TOTAL 1990 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO DATE CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT 330002 330006 330014 330038 330038 11/19/90 11/19/90 11/19/90 11/19/90 11/19/90 39 00 39 00 54 19 54 19 68 53 68 53 2 45 9.75 12.20 VENDOR A-1 MINNETONKA RENT MIDWEST BSNS PROD ALL STAR ELECTRIC ANDERSON-BRUCE ANDERSON-BRUCE ITEM DESCRIPTION RENTAL OFFICE SUPPLIES REPAIR TRAFFIC LGT MTG EXP MILEAGE 11-26-90 PAGE I ACCOUNT NO INV. • P.O. • MESSAGE 01-4331-249-42 01-4210-039-12 01-4233-249-42 Cl-4356-129-31 01-4381-129-31 330042 11/19/90 84.00 A'"L' COFFEE COFFEE 01-4382-039-1233004211/20/90 74.00 r ?>L COFFEE MTG EXP 01-4382-129-3133004211/19/90 84.00 ^ ?L COFFEE COFFEE 01-4382-174-33242.00 • 330074 11/20/90 100.00 BONEi. JO ROSENE t 3N ENG RETAir SEPT 01-4304-200-4133007411/20/90 420.00 BONES ' )0 ROSENE ASN ENG LL ANN ATION 01-4305-200-4133007411/20/90 53.50 BONES“'00 ROSENE ASN ENG BRIDGE NSP 01-4305-249-42330074 11/20/90 357.14 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ENG 1990 S: COAT 01-4305-249-4233007411/20/90 994.71 BONES'ROO ROSENE ASN APPLIC REV VS SEP 01-4305-840-7133007411/20/90 290.63 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN PUB HRG-N V .TS-SS 24-4306-424-0033007411/20/90 190.03 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ASDM/FIt J :.ERV SEP 72-4306-436-8433007411/20/90 279.50 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN PUMPHOUSE REVIEW SEP 72-4306-437-8533007411/20/90 1.194.36 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN INSP WELL 83 SEP 72-4306-437-8533007411/20/90 449.36 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ADM/FIELD SERV SEP 73-4306-433-8133007411/20/90 93.59 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ADM/FIELD SERV SEP 73-4306-434-8233007411/70/:*''954.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ENG LS8 INSP SEP 73-4531-569-925,376.82 * 330085 11/19/90 67.00 BUDGET PRINTING FORMS 01-4322-129-3167.00 • 330087 11/19/90 4.339.04 BURY & CARLSON INC SAND 01-4233-249-424.339.04 * 330100 11/19/90 171.30 CASE POWER A EQUIP LOADER PARTS 01-4232-249-42 -CKS •••-CKS •**-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS -CKS •••-CKS :•) 1990 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO DATE CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 330212 11/19/90 10 20 10.20 330243 11/20/90 250 00 250.00 330258 11/19/90 77 80 77 . 80 330267 11/19/90 15.10 15.10 330275 330275 330275 11/19/90 11/19/90 11/19/90 630.45 615.08 21101 1.456 54 EXPRESS .SSENGER POSTAGE GAB BUST .SS SERVICE CLAIM REIMBURS. GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD WATER GOLF CAR MIDWEST CART REPAIR GROUP HEALTH INC GROUP HEALTH INC GROUP HEALTH INC DEC INS DEC INS DEC INS ACCOUNT NO, INV 171 30 * 330130 330130 330130 % 11/19/90 11/19/90 11/19/90 133 10 02 61 16 194 28 • COLONIAL LIFE INS CO COLONIAL LIFE INS CO COLONIAL LIFE INS CO NOV INS NOV INS NOV INS 01-4151-121-31 01-4151-126-31 01-4151 129-31 330142 330142 11/20/90 11/19/90 90 00 214 48 304 48 ‘ COPY DUP PR INC COPY DUP PR INC TONER RENTAL 01-1261-000-00 01-4210-129-31 330143 330143 330143 330143 330143 330143 330143 330143 330143 330143 11/19/90 11/19/90 11/19/90 11/19/90 11/19/90 11/19/90 11/19/90 11/19/90 11/19/90 11/19/90 8 05 25 15 25.40 3.40 50.53 5.90 16.51 1 42 2 13 85 139.34 • COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP NOV INS NOV INS NOV INS NOV INS NOV INS NOV INS NOV INS NOV INS NOV INS NOV INS 01-4152-03S-12 01-4152-069-15 01-4152-121-31 01-4152-126-31 01-4152-129-31 01-4152-1/4-33 01-4152-249-42 72- 4152-549-91 73- 4152-569-92 74- 4152-590-93 01-4321-174-33 73-4399-433-81 01-4231-099-17 74-4342-590-93 t) 11-26-90 PAGE 2 • P.O, • MESSAGE 01-4151-126-31 01-4151-129-31 74-4151-590-93 ***-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •**-CKS •••-CKS ***-CKS *“*-CKS •••-CKS o 1990 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRI.ACCOUNT NO. INV 330286 330286 11/19/90 11/19/90 37 50 37 50 75.00 * HARRIS OFFICE EQUIP HARRIS OFFICE EQUIP REPAIR rvPEWRITTER REPAIR TYPEWRITTER 01-4342-039-12 01-4342-174-33 330291 11/19/90 6 -5 r HALLIN/DOROTHY MILEAGE 01-4381-r 1-13 330304 330304 330304 11/20/90 11/20/90 11/20/90 27.55- 27 55 27 55 27.55 * DEPT PROPERTY TAX DEPT PROPERTY TAX DEPT PROPERTY TAX POSTAGE POSTAGE POSTAGE 01-4231-040-13 01-4231-040-13 01-4321-040-13 3303^0 330330 11/20/90 11/20/90 -19 52 81 . 12 180.64 * ICMA rZTIREMNT TRUST ICMA F’.TIREMNT TRUST ICMA 10/29 T ICMA ADDL i: 1 01-4140-039-12 01-4140-039-12 330348 11/19/90 75.00 75.00 * INTL \F-B'-0G OFFLS MEMBERSHIP 01-4380-174-33 330370 11/19/90 633.56 633.56 * JIM *^-7CH SAILS CO SIGNS 01-4232-249-42 330377 11/19/90 5.55 5 55 * JOHNSON/BRADLEY MTG 01-4356-121-31 330388 11/19/90 16.83 16.83 * KILBO-MELVIN MTG 01-4356-129-31 330389 330389 330389 330389 330389 11/19/90 11/19/90 11/19/90 11/19/90 11/19/90 18.962.00 18.962.00- 18.962.00 1.896.20- 1.896.20 18.962.00 * KEYS WELL DRILLING KEYS WELL DRILLING KEYS WELL DRILLING KEYS WELL DRILLING KEYS WELL DRILLING WELL 83 PYMNT #7 WELL «3 PYMNT #7 WELL 83 PYMT 87 WELL 83 PYMT 87 WELL 83 PYMNT 87 26-4531-437-88 26-4531-437-88 72-4531-437-85 72-4531-437-85 72-4531-437-85 330435 330435 330435 11/20/90 11/20/90 11/20/90 21.91 40.00 753.43 LOGIS - SUITE 300 LOGIS - SUITE 300 LOGIS - SUITE 300 LABELS FOR RESALE MNT TERMINAL APPL SUPPORT SEPT 01-3500-000-00 01-4340-069-15 01-4352-069-15 Q 11-26-90 PAGE •••-CKS ***-CKS •••-CKS •**-CKS *••-CKS •••-CKS *»*-CKS ***-CKS 1990 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO DATE 330435 330435 330435 330435 330435 330435 330435 330435 330435 330435 330435 330435 330435 330445 330467 330467 330467 33C467 330467 330474 330480 330480 11/20/90 11/20/90 11/20/90 11/20/90 11/20/90 11/20/90 11/20/90 11/20/90 11/20/90 11/20/90 11/20/90 11/20/90 11/20/90 11/19/90 11/19/90 11/19/90 11/19/90 11/19/90 11/19/90 11/19/90 11/19/90 11/20/90 AMOUNT 436 229 434 195 195 1.043 327 18 137 12 31 321 100 4.298 76 30 .59 .53 53 58 .34 .00 .58 .83 00 02 08 .48 11.84 11 84 109.60 109 60 109.60 422.00 320.60 1.071.40 10.715.35 10.715.35 281 26 48 67 329 93 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR LOG IS LOG IS LOG IS LOG IS LOG IS LOG IS LOG IS LOG IS LOG IS LOG IS LOGIS LOG IS LOGIS SUITE 300 SUITE 300 SUITE 300 SUITE 300 SUITE 300 SUITE 300 SUITE 300 SUITE 300 SUITE 300 SUITE 300 SUITE 300 SUITE 300 SUITE jOO LYMAN LUMBER MIDWEST ASPHALT MIDWEST /'SPHALT ITEM DESCRIPTION APPL SUPPORT SEPT APPL SUPPORT SEPT DATA PROC SEPT DATA PROC AUG DATA PROC JULY DATA PROC SEPT DATA PROC SEPT MNT TERMINAL APPL SUPPORT SEPT DATA PROC SEPT MNT TERMINAL APPL SUPPORT SEPT DATA PROC SEPT LUMBER ASPHALT ASPHALT 330490 11/19/90 207.97 MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 330490 11/19/90 11.49 MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 330490 11/19/90 6.32 MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 330490 11/19/90 6.32 MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 330490 11/19/90 6.32-MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 330490 11/19/90 400.22 MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 330490 11/19/90 400.22 MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 330490 11/19/90 400.22- 626.00 • MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 330582 11/20/90 37 50 OMAN/LYLE MILEAGE Q 11-26-90 PAQI « ACCOUNT NO INV • P.O. i MESSAGE 01-4352 01-4352 01-4355 01-4355 01-4355 01-4355 01-4355 72-4340 72-4352 72- 4355 73- 4340 73-4352 73-4355 129-31 174-33 -069-15 -129-31 -129-31 -129-31 -174-33 -549-91 •549-91 -549-91 -569-92 -569-92 -569-92 01-4210-040-13 MED CTR HEALTH CARE DEC INS 01-4151-039-12 MED CTR HEALTH CARE DEC INS 01-4151-069-15 MED CTR HEALTH CARE DEC INS 01-4151-129-31 MED CTR HEALTH CARE DEC INS 01-4151-174-33 MED CTR HEALTH CARE DEC INS 01-4151-249-42 METRO W ^ -DEC SERV 73-1282-000-00 01-4233-249-42 01-4233-249-42 01-4324- 01-4324- 72-4324- 72-4324- 72- 4324- 73- 4324 73-4324 73-4324 099-17 129-31 549-91 549-92 549-92 569-92 569-93 569-93 01-4381-174-33 •••-CKS -CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •**-CKS •••-CKS 1990 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO TVV 37 50 • 330590 11/19/90 160 65 OTTEN BROS TREE 01-4390-249-42 160 65 • 330597 11/13/90 3.965 69 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 10/29-11/11 01-2031-000-00 3.965 69 • 330613 11/19/90 168.65 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR BRAKE REPAIR 01-4341-249-42 168 65 * 330657 11/19/9C 56 97 RFG PF ^ & SUPPLY CO DOG FOOD 01-4244-129-31 56 97 • 330665 11/19/90 13.35 RICK' UPERVALU SUPPLIES 74-4232-590-93 13.35 * 330675 11/19/90 5.088.27 ROLL." > OIL CO GASOLINE 01-1260-000-00 5.088.27 * 330678 11/20/90 600.00 SAFE oENEFITS 1ST PYMT TLEX PLAN 01-4306-299-72 600.00 • 330693 11/19/90 1.440.00 SCHOENINQ EXCAVATING SWEEP STREETS 01-4331-249-42 1.440.00 * 330719 11/19/90 30.00 DIXIE PETRO-CHEM DEMURRAGE 72-4234-549-91 30.00 • 330740 11/19/90 132.85 STREICHERS SUPPLIES 01 1232-129-31 330740 11/19/90 10.00 STRETCHERS LGT REPAIR 01-4342-129-31142.85 • 330741 11/19/90 3.40 DEMBOUSKI/JAY MTG 01-4356-129-313.40 • o11-28-90 PAGE 5 •••-CKS -CKS -CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS r 1990 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 158.61 * a 11-29-90 PAQI I CHECK NO.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. IN\ 330779 % 11/19/90 1,321 32 1,321.32 * TRACY OIL CO DIESEL 01-4220-249-42 330782 11/19/90 5.25 TOMCZYK/MARK MTG 01-4356-129-31 5 25 * 330796 11/19/90 65.95 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED BOOTS/THOMTON 01-4221-121-31 65 95 * 330815 11/19/90 45.94 US WEST COMMON DATA PRCC 01-4320-129-31 330815 11/19/90 29.62 US WEST COMMON TELEPHONE 01-4320-249-42 330815 11/19/90 27.41 US WEST COMMUN DATA PROC 01-4355-069-15 330815 11/19/90 22.42 US WEST COMMUN DATA PROC 72-4355-549-91 330815 11/19/90 33.22 US WEST COMMUN DATA PROC 73-4355-569-91 330835 11/19/90 46.50 WARNING LITES OF MN FLASHER 01-4331-249-42 46.50 * 330841 11/19/90 653.88 WATER PR- !UCTS CO MTRS 72-1273-000-00 653.88 • 330845 11/19/90 4.00 4.00 • WECKMAN STEPHEN MILEAGE 01-4381-174-33 330901 11/19/90 459 36 GARY BRIGGS TRAINING 01-4356-129-31 330901 11/19/90 .01-GARY BRIGGS TRAINING 01-4356-129-31 459.35 • 330902 11/19/90 11.27 LANIER VOICE PROD FAX PAPER 01-4210-039-12 330902 11/19/90 11.27 LANIER VOICE PROD FAX PAPER 01-4210-059-14 330902 11/19/90 11.27 LANIER VOICE PROD FAX PAPER 01-4210-069-15 330902 11/19/90 11.26 LANIER VOICE PROD FAX PAPER 01-4210-129-31 330902 11/19/90 11.27 LANIER VOICE PROD FAX PAPER 01-4210-174-33 330902 11/19/90 11.26 67.60 * LANIER VOICE PROD FAX PAPER 01-4210-249-42 330903 11/19/90 1.180.00 METRO WASTE OCT SAC 01-2226-000-00 •*“-CKS •*“-CKS •*‘-CKS -CKS -CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS ( 1990 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV 1.180 00 * 330904 11/19/90 287 55 287.55 * NATL FIRE PROTECT SUBSCRIPTION 01-4322-174-33 330905 11/19/90 262 00 262 00 • ST CLOUD STATE DRIVING CLASS 01-4356-129-31 330906 330906 330906 11/19/90 11/19/90 11/19 '90 38 16 12 72 76 32 127 20 * PAM OIL INC PAM OIL INC PAM OIL INC SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 01-4232-129-31 01-4232-174-33 01-4232-249-42 330907 11/19/90 100 00 100 00 * URBAN LAND INST DUES 01-4380-174-33 330908 330908 330908 11/19/90 11/19/90 11/19/90 15.20 15.20- 152.00 152.00 * WESSTSIDE REDIMOX WESSTSIDE REDIMOX WESSTSIDE REDIMOX CEMENT CEMENT CEMENT 72-4345-549-91 72-4345-549-91 72-4345-549-91 330909 11/19/90 37.65 37.65 * SCHAAR INC STAMP 01-4210-174-33 330910 11/19/90 316.00 316.00 • BRC { -.CTIONS CK ELECTIO MACMN 01-4342-040-13 330911 11/20/90 12.961 00 12.961.00 * PLYMO 'H ROOFING REROOF WTF LT 72-4345-549-91 31.264.14 290.63 34.62> ' 13,3/ 2t FUNi^ 01 TOTAL fun:; 24 TOTAL FUND 72 TOTAL FUND 73 TOTAL FUND 74 TOTAL GENERAL FU O PERM IMPRO-. REVOLVING WATER OPER'ING FUND SEWER OPERATING FUND GOLF COURSE OPERATING F FD 79.766 TOTAL o 11-26-90 PAGE •-CKS USER ACCOUNTING REPORT 00 1990 CITY OF ORONO » NUMBER OF REPORTS NUMBER OF UPDATES NUMBER OF RECORDS LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5 LEVEL 6 LEVEL 7 LEVEL 8 LEVEL 9 LEVEL 0 TOTAL QEMUN'S FINANCIAL SYSTEM 91 0 1.022 0 0 0 34 0 0 627 0 2 1.687 UPDATE DESCRIPTIONS SUMMARY FILE PAYROLL BENEFIT ACCRUAL ACTIVITY REPORT CHECK REGISTER TRIAL BALANCE BALANCE SHEET REVENUE STATEMENT OPERATING STATEMENT BUDGET WORKSHEETS CLEAR-CURR-MONTH CITY FILE OPTION PROJECT DEPARTMENT CHART OF ACCOUNTS MO CHECK RECONCILE YEAR TO DATE PERIOD BUDGET RECORDS CREATED 0 11 O 11/20/90 PAGE FINANCIAL REPORTS SCHEDULED RUN DATE REPORT DATE 000000 000000 ACTIVITY REPORTS SCHEDULED RUN DATE 112090 REPORT DATE 112690 PAYROLL POSTING DATES 000000 000000 000000 000000 Tad |ude COMMlSNK'NtR PHOME 3-»fi 30A-t Board of H ennepin County Commissioners 2*400 G0\'ERNMENT CENTER Minneapolis . Minnesota =>31^7 November 19, 1990 Mark Bernhardson City Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55487 r.O'/ 2 6 1990 Dear Mark: Thank you for contacting me concerning the legal notice of the maximum allowable 1991 budget for Hennepin County. I agree with you that 14.3% is just plain unacceptable! The board voted unanimously to cut the amount to 10.9%. There ure many specific spending items I have voted against in the past and will vote against in the future. Two large spending items I'm against are the Light Rail Transit property tax levy, as well as the outrageous $180 million price tag now hung on the new proposed jail. Unfortunately, I have found that many mandates from the state, over which the county has very little discretion, drive our Hennepin County property taxf ' up. Rapidly growing spending items are the placement of kids outside of thei • homes in foster care, mandated on us, and the massive increase in criminal justice spending driven by increased crime rates. Underlying the many state mandates is a basic unfair set of property tax rules which work against property owners in Hennepin County. Tax Increment Financing and Fiscal Disparities has been eating away at our property tax base which means homeowners and businesses have to pay higher taxes in Hennepin County. I'm still not pleased with a 10.9% increase in mill levy, yet, the alternative of going lower is to risk our bond rating and to have appointed judges order county spending. In the end that alternative would cost taxpayers a lot more. I support a commission on efficiency to try to find new areas where we can trim back county spending. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance on this or other issues of concern. Sincerely, ei /IK S fnaven • “ ‘ "Servinit the CQaiMvaitics of: Corcoran • Dayton • Dcefhlven • Excelsior • Greenfield • Greenwood Hanover • Hassan • Independence • Lon^ Lake o Loretto • Maple Grove • Maple Plain • Medicine Lake Medina • Minnetonka ^ach e Minnetrista • Mound • New Hope • Orono • Plymouth • Rockford • Rogers SL Bonifaeius • Shorewood o Spring Park • Tonka Bay • Wayxata • Woodland THESE ARE LETTERS RECEIVED TO DATE IN RESPONSE TO TRUTH IN TAXATION NOTICES. r life, 4510 North Shore Drive Urono, Mn. 55--64 i-«u vtriMUt?r 13, IttO m ISSD Qrono City Council 1335 Brown Road So. Or ono, Mn• 55391 The 1991 City Of Qrono property taxes are excessive and opressive* Ihe personal incomes of most residentai property owners will not increase 13*/.. Each time you increase our taxes, you force the individual family to tighten its budget. In my case, retirement savings and college funds for my four children will be squeezed. You are mortgaging our futures and the futures of our children. Just as 1 must live within my means, Qrono must manage within its means. This may mean cutting some nice, but not essential proqrams. NO MORE I AX AND SPEND. GET RID OF PROGRESSIVE PROPERf Y TAXES TAX AT A FAIR FLAT RAIE. Ne fired the Governor, we fired our Mayor. EXCESSIVE TAXATION!!!!! . . Why ??-^7 Wake up and listen to the hard working tax payer. We had enough increases from Hennepin County our State Federal Governments! ET fU QRONO? Sincere!y, Katheryn M. Sawicki ■■.- '-VHt- '■ /••■ ''>"W ‘ ORONO» MN 66364 1- ^ 1 liS // r 1 'j *. ”V . f'i;': 'ifKl V'2cyu 733^^ & ~ (, fe • .i i|7- '■i- .; ■• ’.r3. ‘.V • I 'M- r •■'■ f,;: : - w- 7T':—. -;• ■'‘i' ’■'•74 'iU'-'.''.' 'M0 wm. k ■ ,v> • •‘iJ ■■ ■\ > :• . • k • • • ••' . “'>•: • :ic ;'„7- 77- '\\ ' ■ > ••• • 7 ' MV- t ',> . t '• i.Tb'■ •••■'*; ‘;I!; :c:{,,-. i i: '■>i •! V': . JJ ;- ■ f ■ ■ ^.:77 ’ ■ C. . .} ■Vv V 'r-••'i. :* ;■: 7i:/ . -fliilili'o::si*fe' 10'£< :\ -■ •', ^k,' • I ••- : '. — sr V ■ ‘ :r*. • .v’.-'rvj 7 -i^ ■:.#t iet/r i I V- r=c JiiORONO CITY HALL 1335 BROWN RD. SO. ORONO. MN. 55391 .NOV. 1 9 1800 I received a NOTICE OF PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX FOR 1991 as a resident of your taxing district. I see that the city proposes to increase its ta.xing authority by 13.1% for 1991. I have not been able to understand the rationale for tax increases substantially in excess of an increase In wages» the cost of living index, or any other leading indicator of the movement in the value of the dollar. It seems clear that a population increase is not causing the excessive increase, as I infer that information on the notice to imply. In any event, please send me the necessary information to demonstrate the need for the tax increase so I can evaluate it on its merits. If I used the methodology employed by the local governmental units to get a wage increase or raise m; billing rates, be assured that I would soon be unemployed. Unfortunately, I have no choice but to bu: services frcir. you. Please gi-.e me the courtesy of a r**sponse by return mail so I can make a decision in my own mind i: the increase n’a.-ies economic sense. Otht'rwise, T may be fcr'e'l -.o join all •‘he other local citizenry in angry protest at your meeting on proposed taxes. Sincerely, LEE HARREN 175 LANDMARK DRIVE LONG LAKE^ MN. 5 3 33*3 & !| ■: - ■ sS |F W-V /jjo" ^[L )'r'»» Cl.,'"I ^‘’’sy ;n >*>,y •; • !■•• i'- ":4l: X-; :??:;■« ;'SI - '^4 *r; ■ ■•.>■ ■ i.>\''.■■;■ Ev .>yv..'i|’vV- i' lv#f ' ' -v^ii*iiiay:;:iai^^s ,'.yi ■ :■ <W- ■ ■' :v".'•« * • 1 • '.'v^ . • . r . ■ ’ ■ y ■ ■ ' i ’ ’ *■•'. \ g- .1.. h... .■■.uiyy[ ••' 4-. 7 \ j;• ,• m . ■' ''‘iiiiis® ■aw ■lit giiif LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT WATER STRUCTURES & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE AGENDA 7:30 a.m., Saturday, November 17, 1990 Shorewood City Hall 5755 Country Club Road HOV 1 3 1990 1. Ninnetonka Boat Rentals: Requesting a reconsideration of Board action of 10/28/87 which amended the variance order of 6/27/8A providing for one additional pontoon as temporary fishing rental storage from fishing opener to July 1, changing to full*season storage. 2. Excelsior Bay Yacht Club, dba Excelsior Park Tavern, update on EAW status with City of Excelsior and request by applicant to continue the arrangement of 1990 to operate existing facility providing for 10 transient and 22 storage slips, accompanied by the full schedule of amenities for the 40-81ip new marina. 3. Review final copy of amendment to Code 2.05, Subd. 4(b), Amenities, for Board action. 4. Deposit refunds If:A.City of Wayzata for new dock i-(0 $100 each - $200) b-B.DMA deposits (0 $100 each); City of Deophaven City of Excelsior Methodist Lakeside 5. Additional business recommended 1 Ji. Minnetonka Yacht Club Wayeata Yacht Club ENVIRONMENT 1. Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force, Chair Reese A. Progress on 1991 budget B. Operations Plan update 2. Additional business recommended by the committee 11-9-90 i- pi: h- lake MINNETONKA CONSEMVATION DiSTPIC LAKE USE COMMITTEE AGENDA 4:30 p.m., Monday, November 2h, 1990 Shorewood City Hall 5755 Country Club Road NOV i 9 1990 1. Steve Tallen presentation on BWI appeal 2. Personal Watercraft (PW) Subcommittee recommendation for proposed MN DNR Bill for an Act regulating PW. 3. Review final copy of Amendments to Code 53.041 Subd. 2. PW Flotation devices. 4. Deposit Refund The Minnetonka Yacht Club for 1990 Consolidated Race Schedule (last race = October 27th) 5. Review of Code I3.01» Subd. 18, Commercial Sales on the Lake, sales of food, etc. on lake ice not addressed in the Code. 6. Review of special event report summary form. 7. Water Patrol report 8. Additional business recomn.^udea by the conmj?rtee 11-16-90 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT CONTACT: Rachel Thibault 473-7033 NEWS RELEASE November 15, 1990 SUBJECT; Buoy Removal Deadline for Lake Minnetonka Now December 13 F I l:'- F f: -. Persons having buoys in Lake Minnetonka are reminded that they are required to remove them or submerge them under the lake Ice. The deadline for removal or submerging buoys under the Ice has been delayed until December 15 by recent Lake Minnetonka Conservation District ordinance amendment. A date later than December 15 may be authorized in writing by the Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol upon written request by the owner prior to December 15. Written requests should be directed to: Sheriff, Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol, P. 0. Box 187, Spring Park, MH 55384. The allowance for leaving buoys temporarily In the lake beyond December 15 is conditioned in part on whether or not they will create a hazard to traffic on the lake ice. The Water Patrol will make that determination. Buoys not removed in accordance with this requirement are considered illegally placed and hazardous structures. Such structures are subject to removal and impoundment by the sheriff if the owner fails to remove it upon written notification, or if the owner cannot be located. The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District encourages everyone to cooperate with the spirit of the ordinance for everyone's safrty and enjoyment of the lake. Lake users are also asked to cooperate in removing all material taken on the lake. Litter on the lake Ice is considered one of the most easy-to-avoid problems. Disposal receptacles are at or near all public accesses. Tour cooperation is appreciated by all. XXX Lake Minnetonka Cable Communlca^ons Commission443 OAK STREET • EXCELSIOR. MINNESOTA 55331 • 1612) 474-5539 X. II. 111. IV. V. LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION IMOV 1 4 1890FULL COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 1990 5:00 P.M ROOM 204 EXCELSIOR COMMUNITY CENTER 443 OAK STREET, EXCELSIOR AGENDA Call to Order Approval of October minutes Report# a) Officers Treasurer: 3rd Quarter Budget Report Just Claims b) Administrator c) Triax Unfinished Business a) Investigation of compliance regarding cable outage 9/20-29/90 b) Approval of System Change Documentation c) Channel Activation Proposal Mem Business a) Data Collaction Committee Report and Recommendation VI. Adjournment f|:.- Vv MINUTES LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING TUESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 1990 5:00 P.M. ROOM 204, EXCELSIOR COMMUNITY CENTER 443 OAK STREET, EXCELSIOR I.CALL TO ORDER Chairnan Anderson called the meeting to order at 5:02 P.M. DIRECTORS PRESENT Ton Andnraon/Medlna Barb Brancnl/Shorewood Jim Olds/Excelsior Jim Swartwood/Long Lake Otto Wilczek/Minnestriata Jimmie Wright/Greenwood OTHERS PRESENT Jennifer Watts/Admin. Kathe Ehlert/Admin. Asst Jim Schindler/Prod. Coor (arrived 5:30) Paul Nazarow/Triax Tom Wimler/Triax II .APPROVAL OF MINUTES Chairman Anderson asked for discussion of the minutes from the September meeting or a motion to approve. Watts made a correction tc the Just Claims: check number 2129 should be 2191. Motion 10.16.90.1: Brancel moved to approve the September minutes, as amended. Olds seconded. The motion passed un­ animously. Ill. REPORTS Treasurer * s Report Wilczek presented the Just Claims for the period 9/19/90 to 10/16/90. Anderson asked about the items purchased with the of­ fice equipment funds. Watts replied the purch.. fe included tables, chairs, steno chairs, panels, desks, fii? cabinets,and computer hutch for the office in Room 204. Motion 10.16.90.2: Wilczek moved to approve the Just Claims for the period 9/19/90 to 10/16/90. Wright seconded. The motion passed unanimously. j^^y^nlstrator *s Report Administrator Watts asked Production Coordinator Schindler to present the studio report, which was distributed to the commissioners. Watts then added the second camcorder had been received and was now in use in the Orono studio, and that a crew would be taping the League of Women Voters debates for Excelsior and Shorewood. Watts stated that election results from the lake area communities would be listed on Channel 20 following the election on November 6. Watts reported to the Commission that Bill Stivers had been hired as the production assistant. He would be working 12-15 LMCCC October minutes Page Two hours per week, starting Thursday, October 18. Rent on the new office space had begun on October 1 ana would continue on a monthly basis. Watts suggested, and it was agreed, that the full commission meeting in November be held in the new apace. Watts reported that Wilczek, Brancel and she had attended the Tonka Bay City Council meeting and the council had agreed to ap­ prove the budget. The objection had been that budget was not reduced from last year, and they wanted to see more money go into creating new jobs, production and equipment. Minnetrista had also approved the budget. Shorewood and Long Lake had taken no action yet. Watts reminded the Commission that the MACTA conference would be the following Friday and that she and Jim Schindler would be attending, as well as Olds and Wilczek. The LCP-NN conference would be held in Fridley on Saturday, October 20. Watts, Schindler and Hughes-Seamans would attend. A discussion about upcoming conferences followed with no specific plans made. Watts reported that she dio not yet have in all the bids for the 1990 financial review, but would put the item on the agenda when all materials had been collected. Watts said Paul Nazarow would be addressing the issue of late fees during his report, as well as the Patty Ploetz request for X-PRESS X-CHANGE. In addition, there had been five complaints received this month dealing with line extensions, tiering, costs associated with pay packages and the outage cn September 28. Watts had provided the commissioners with copies of the letters she had written to Triax regarding the Regional 6 outage and the outage on September 28 and subsequent problems. The fact that Triax shut the system down during peak viewing times appeared to be contrary to the franchise agreement. Watts had talked to Nazarow about the problem. He acknowledged the mistake and agreed that subscribers who called to complain would receive a credit. It was not clear whether the subsequent bad reception was due to the switch to fiber or other technical problems. Anderson asked what power the franchise agreement gave the com­ mission in the case of a violation. Watts stated it would depend on the violation. Wright said that subscribers who did not call should also receive credit. Motion 10.16.90.3; Wilczek moved that the Commission direct staff to investigate and document any findings of violation of the franchise agreement and any penalties attached to those violations; and upon agreement by the Commission of violation, penalties be imposed on Triax unless Triax agrees to offer credit to all subscribers affected by the outage of September 28 and 29th. Swartwood seconded the motion, and it passed un­ animously. IV, UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1) Late fee regulation issue Anderson moved to the issue of late fee regulation. LMCCC Minutes Page Three Swartwood asked to speak on the matter and told the Commission that he had recently been charged a late fee. He had deposited hiS payment in the Wayzata drop box on tne date specified by Trlax. When he received his next bill he had been assessed a late fee. He contacted Triax regarding the late fee and was told that possibly his payment was picked up at the drop box, but not nailed to the office on time. Wilcsek stated that any payment deposited in the drop box on the date specified by Triax was made on time, and that if the paperwork was not done on time that was not the subscriber a problem. He suggested a time/date stamp be used at the drop box site. Wacts added that these policies need to be stated clearly to subscribers. Paul Nazarow and Tom Wimler had just arrived, and provided the Commission with copies of Triax's subscriber contracts that are given to the customer at the time of installation. Watts asked if the information was sent to each customer every year as stated in the franchise agreement. Nazarow stated that it was sent in February of this year. Watts stated that at the annual review of the system in February, the Commission asked for a copy of everything sent to the subscriber annually and that the paper offered was not part of the packet provided at that^ review. Nazarow said the information was on the customer's work order and was in the February mailing. Anderson said that it should be sent out annually in the future. Swartwood suggested that the information be re~done, specifically the information regarding the drop box. Watts stated that information should be provided to subscribers on how to file complaints with the cable commission and that the franchise agreement states specifically what additional information must be included in an annual sub­ scriber mailing and at installation. Motion 10.16,90.4; Wilczek moved that Triax comply with the re­ quired notification by the next annual mailing, including an ad­ dendum explaining subscribers rights of complaint and payments made at drop box sites. Brancel seconded. The motion passed unanimously. Triax Report Chairman Anderson asked for the Triax report at this time. Nazarow presented the monthly report, using the new format to •Mow how many customers were on expanded basic and on basic ser­ vice. At that time, one customer was on basic only, but Nazarow stated there were about 50-75 customers who had asked for basic only, and these would show on the next report. The report showed a growth of 77 subscribers overall. Homes Passed Basic Subs Expanded Basic Subs Total Pay Units Total A/0'a Total Remotes 10,557 1 5,961 3,957 3,534 2,567 *4- LMCCC Minutes Page Four NazarowWatts asked why the homes passed had dropped to 10,557. said It was an error, and he would correct it. Anderson asked Nazarow to address the outage of September 28. Nazarow explained that approximately 140 customers called to ask what the problem was, and that all these calls were docu~ mented. Nazarow said that on page 22 of the franchise agree­ ment, it stated that planned interruptions should occur during times of minimum use of service and that subscribers shall be gxven reasonable notice of that interruption. He then quoted from the September letter to subscribers which stated it would be necessary to change the channel line-up and that information would be available on Channel 19. In addition, the message ran through the month ot September on channel 8, telling subscribers of a possible interruption of service due to the rebuilding/replacement of old cable with fiber optic. The message also gave the phone number to call for assistance. Nazarow stated that he felt Triax had given the subscribers suf­ ficient information for 30 days prior to the switch. He then referred again to the franchise agreement which states that if service is interrupted for more than 48 hours, subscribers shall be credited for such interruptions. He went on to say that in actuality, there was no credit due because the outage was not in excess of 40 hours, but he had of­ fered to credit the accounts of those customers who called. The credits would be pro-rated. Wilczek stated that he felt the notice on Channels 8 and 19 were not sufficient as they were not specific as to day and time. Nazarow stated that it was not their plan to make the swxtch in the late afternoon on a Friday. Coordination of staff and equipment was difficult, he said, and he thought the switch went smoothly, all things considered. Watts asked when they would typically do this type of a switch in a system. Wimler replied any day in the ..lorning during a nor­ mal week. He then stated that he had been stuck in the office on an emergency problem all day instead of in the field super­ vising the switch. Watts asked how many subscribers were served by the headend in Excelsior and affected by the outage. Wimler said he didn't have the number of subscribers served by the Excelsior head-end, but if affected the communities of Excel­ sior, Shorewood, Greenwood, Deephaven, Woodland, and Victoria. Anderson asked about the difficulty in reception after cho switch. Wimler replied that there was a bad amplifier that had to be replaced and overheating of another piece of equipment. Wright said that he was still surprised that they went ahead with the switch on a Friday afternoon. He went on to say that he felt it was blatantly unfair that rebates woult only be given to those who called; that there were people who didn't or couldn't call and suffered the same outages, and they should all be given a rebate. Olds asked how much the rebate would be. Nazarow stated that it would be based on the number of hours that service was out i i'f X : ps-■ lx ■;x. LnCCC October Minutes Page Five and the charge to subs per hour for cable. Wxiczek said that the Coaeiaaion would look further xnto the compliance issue. IV.UNFIMISHED BUSINESS, cont'd. 2) Update on cable aystee documentation Watts reminded the Coaniaaion they voted to give Triax 60 days froa the September meeting to provide documentation and specific technical data relating to the aystem changes. Nazarow dis­ tributed those materials to the Commission. Watts asked for tine to review the documents. Motion 10.16.90.Si Anderson moved to table approval of the documentation of the changes to the cable system until the next meeting. Wilcsek seconded. The motion passed unanimously. 3) Update on activation of Channel 6 Watts stated that she had not yet met with Nazarow regarding that activation. She asked Nazarow to meet with her prior to in the next meeting to discuss the issue. Motion 10.IS.90.6t Anderson moved that Watts and Nazarow meet in the next two weeks to address the activation of Channel 8. Wilcsek seconded. The motion passed unanimously. V.MEW BUSIMESS 1) Capital fund request 2) Formation of Access Advisory Board Watts requested that both these items be tabled. Motion 10.16.90.78 Swartwood moved that both new business items be tabled due to the late hour. Wilczek seconded. The motion passed unanimously. Wilcsek asked the Commission to authorize up to S500 for him to attend the Orlando regulatory conference sponsored by the University of Wisconsin/Hadison, If he could coordinate it, as he would be in Orlando on business that week. Motion 10.16-90.ft» Olds moved to authorise up to SSOO to send Wilcsmk to thm Orlando conference In November. Swartwood smeondmd. Thm motion passed unanimously. VI. ADJOURI Wilcsek moved to adjourn the meeting mmmtlng adjourned at 6:30 P.M. Swartwood seconded. The Respectfully subeltted* Kathe Ehlert Administrative Assistant LMCCC JUST CLAIMS 9/19/90 TO 10/16/90 CHKClCt DATE PAYABLE 2192 9/19 AT&T 10250 9/28 Aaron Bl«ch«rr 10251 9/28 JiB Schindl«r 10252 9/28 Jonnitor 'ilAZzm 10253 9/28 Kath« Ehlart 2193 9/28 U.S. Woar 2194 9/28 Surplus 0££ic« Supply 2195 9/28 CoBfflunicatlons World SW 2196 9/28 MN Surburban News 2197 9/28 PERA 2198 9/28 U.S. Postmaster 2199 9/26 Jennifer Watts 2200 9/28 Petty Cash 2201 10/1 MACTA 2202 10/1 LCP’MN 2203 VOID . . . . . . . . . . . . 10254 10/15 Jim Schindler 10255 10/15 Jennifer Watts 10256 10/15 Kathe Ehlert 2204 10/15 PERA 2205 10/15 PERA 2206 10/15 Moreest Banks 2207 10/15 Paychex 2208 10/15 EPA Audio/Visu 2209 10/15 Tonka Printing 2210 10/15 Jim Schindler TOTAL CLAIMS lAMK SXCELSiOJR Beginning Balance ClaiBs Depositsi Tape Purchase Interest Service Charge ENDING BALANCE ICCO ACCOUNTS <as of 10/16/90) Balance Share Aoct. Balance Preferred Acct. Certificates of Deposit (matures: ENDING BALANCE TOTAL FUNDS AMOUNT ACCOUNT S 579.97 Off. iiauir*. 264.98 Payroi- 482.53 Payrol. 808.15 Payroi. 74.34 Payr . 65.97 Teiepn-.Ti.? 2,170.00 Office tun. 180.00 0£flC« 74.00 Adv / ProiT’-.^ 162.73 PERA c'vMiei ; ». 50.00 Post aci>* 83.72 Mileac- 93.96 VarioM 16u.OU Cont/ : 66 . Ou Coni'-' t' • 451.67 Payee* t 1 799.15 Payrol. 51.72 Payr * j-i 158.78 PERA D-n< •! i, 1 9.00 PERA iit« 1,145.49 Fed »:ax~- 34.90 Sec'y -••f. 1,464.65 Accecr ^ -j! ! 87.90 Otfx<->.‘ .-'l: 35,36 Mileau • S9,555.77 31,530.65 -9,555.77 11 /!'.») 1// 4: i) 1//2 n 22,097.43 S3,448.43 1,297.74 26,000.00 20,000.Ou „IP^P0_.J3U S60,746.17 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 278 HELD ON OCTOBER 22. 1990 I A 1.'^ The regular meeting of the School Board of Orono Independent School District No. 278 was held on Monday, October 22, 1990. Present: Dave McKown Don Anderson Lucie Taylor James Franklin Peg Swanson Thomas Mich William Fenho1t John Maresh arrived while the meeting was in progress. UPON MOTION by Lucie Taylor, seconded by Jim Franklin, the consent agenda was approved as follows; - approved the minutes of the October 8, 1990 regular meeting; - approved the appointment of Linda Ahlstrom as a short hour cook at Schumann Elementary School; - approved the appointment of Julie Feldmann as a part-time library clerk at Orono High School; - approved the appointment of Betty Mueller as a part-time typing lab clerk at Orono High School; - approved the appointment of Jeff Stark as a part-time district-wide custodian; - approved the bills as covered by vouchers 067622 through 067748 and building construction bills as covered by vouchers 1110 through 1146. Motion carried. Board member Maresh absent. Dr, Mich reported that he had met with the faculty at each building regarding construction update, state finances, equity lawsuit and outcome based education; that two sessions of the Elements of Effective Instruction were held for new teachers and their mentors and that he wanted to express appreciation to Trinity Lutheran Church for the use of their facility; that October 22 was a pro­ fessional day for faculty for which each teacher submitted an individual plan for the use of that day for professional growth/development; that the Orono Education Fund, which enables additional programs in the schools, and the Scholarship Fund have within this past week begun their fundraising for the year; that Vicki Perri, from HTC, p-^esented an inservice program today for clerical staff after which the clerical staff had the opportunity to provide input regarding their staff development needs; that the sectional football game will be held at 7:30 p.m. on October 23 against Chaska; that the United Way cam­ paign has been completed with employees donating $5,932.00 this year which was an increase from the last year; that Or. Ernie Stachowski will teach the Classroom Management course on November 12 and 13 for new teachers and Board members are invited to attend; that a Teacher Meet and Confer meeting was held on October 10 with the primary topic being specialist time at the elementary level which will be discussed at the next administrative meeting. Don Anderson congratulated the girU soccer team on their conference championship. Dave McKown briefly reported on the TIES Annual Meeting which was held October 10, 1990. As an informational item, Bill Fenholt addressed the change orders on the new construction. He stated that, in his experience with construction projects, he does not consider them to be an excessive amount owing to the ability of the foreman, Ron Hendricks, to resolve problems at no additional cost. Toni Bergland introduced Ms. Lois Moffitt, Director of the Community Resource Pool who provided the Board with background information on the development of the Community Resource Pool stating that their mission is to provide curriculum enrichment focusing on the current curriculum of the schools who participate in the program, Ms. Moffitt explained the process followed by teachers in order to utilize the service of the Community Resource Pool and she provided information on the presentations that have been or will be utilized by Orono teachers. She acknowledged Marvel Bongart as the catalyst for extensive utilization of the service of CRP by the teachers at Orono Primary School and Schumann Elementary School and stated that they are in the process of planning sessions with the new teachers at Orono Middle School. At the high school level, Ms. Moffitt stated that they are working to get information to the teachers on the caliber of resources that CRP can provide for their classrooms, the purpose being to increase the useage of CRP on that level. Ms. Moffitt answered questions from the Board for clarification purposes. The Board received the tabulation results of the breakfast survey which shows that far less than 15% indicated an interest in the provision of breakfast by the school district. The meeting was recessed at 7:55 p.m. and the Board met in executive session regarding the Superintendent evaluation. The mee ing reconvened at 8:25 p.m. Dave McKown reported on the Superintendent evaluation stating that the Board of Education is well pleased with the performance of the Superintendent and they acknowledge the excellent leadership Dr. Mich provides for the district. UPON MOTION by John Maresh, seconded by Lucie Taylor, the Board of Education ^^pproved the removal of electrical poles and overhead wiring and changing the three pole transformers to pad transformers at ground level at the front of the new addition and directed administration to negotiate any additional cost with the contractors. Carried unanimously. Dr. Mich presented the site plan, conducted by Roy A. Anderson Associates, for the existing campus and also the site plan for the acreage across from the main campus. Dr. Mich stated that the district does not, a. this time, plan to use the land and that the site plan was developed primarily for future planning. The Board requested that a site plan also be conducted for the primary school at a future date. ;UPON MOTION by Lucie Taylor, seconded by Don Anderson, the meeting was adjourned. Lucienne J. Taylor,/'/le'rk Approved: t)ave McKown, chairman O R O S O SCHOOLS 685 Old Cr> stal Bay Road Lona Lake. Minnesota 55356 (612)473-7313 Fax (612) 473-1477 Independent School District 278 November 20, 1990 William A. Fenholt Superintendent /vov 2 1 1S90 Ms. Dorothy Hal 1 in 1335 Brown Road South Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Ms. Hal 1 in: We thought that each city clerk or administrator in our school district might like to receive information regarding the school's tax levy. Obviously, this brief letter does not cover all aspects of the levy increase but will, hopefully, give you some advance information. -irst, the School Board is not raising taxes by 16.9%. This percentage represents the dollar increase over last year's levy. When this amount is spread over the total tax base, which has increased about 12%, the increase will be less for most taxpayers. However, the dollar increase on a specific property will depend upon a number of variables, including whether or not the property has been reassessed. Second, the total dollar levy is determined largely by the state and, except in two of the three areas the School Board has control (Referenda and Debt Service), the matters first must face a vote of the electorate. The only item in the current levy which is not a result of mandates, voter approval, or essential to the maintenance of our facilities and instructional program is the amount being levied for the fifty-one acre tract of land. That decision was the result of serious facilities planning for the school district. Our basic operating levy, under the state mandated formula, is determined by the tax base; as the base increases, the dollars collected locally increase with a corresponding decrease in state aids. The end result of this "Robin Hood" concept is that more state aids are then paid to other school districts with declining property value. This year's levy is for the 1991-92 school year and the legislature has stated that we will receive no increase in general education aid for 1991-92 even though almost half of the levy increase is for this purpose. We hope this will be changed during the 1991 session. Serving . . • Independence —Long Lake—Maple Plain—Medina —Minnetonka Beach—Orono An Equal Opportunity Employer Our budget projection for 1991-92 shows a increase in general operation costs over 1990-91 and this includes the added cost for the nine classroom addition and pool. We Iso included two additional teachers' salaries for increased enrol! We will do well to main­ tain our present fund balance in that ye. .h currently represents less than 4% of our operating budget. The 1990-91 budget of 423 pages may be reviewed at the District Office by any citizen. The detailed 1991-92 budget will be prepared this winter. Furthermore, a more complete presentation of the budget and tax levies will be provided in the December 3 issue of the Pioneer and at the December 10 tax hearing. Sincerely, William A. Fenholt Ass't. to the Supt. WAF/jl Ji - 'm Edward H. Hamm 408 St. Peter St. St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 ^ 612 / 298-0217 fj-ear- «ioy 0 C^' t :,c- ^ r' / - • f i|¥Bffl'-■ [f; j 'I il Hi i is. / / ^ ’ -wt , U,<-^ '■j I lCsu.'dirf y\AJiiijL^ . 7^’ f^/fc^ ^ wva<.u ' A %' ^ tt-u- ti /' ^—) (yjuv cM^ (,w '^’^Cucui. f V 54, ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT INSPECTION REPORT O M ( ' N O OWNER ADDRESS PERMIT NO/S.DATES On the Sorth Shore of Lake Minnetonka POST OFFICE BOXER 1335 S. Brown Rd. Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Ckci^/r} 5" 17CONTRACTORS □ l 1^2 Ordintnet No. 210 rtquir** that aach on^iita tawaga treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis. The on-site seiMage traotmant lytiam at the about addran h« baan inspected and appoan to fail into the category checked below. (Thia it (9 an txistina syttar:' H new construction) Maata or eaeaadi .-current Ciiv • -’^dardt m all respects relating to design, construction, and location. Appears to be operating properly. Ooat not meat all current C it ..tandards lor new construction M978 Code! but in most respects appears to be designed, located, artd constructed ganerelly in accordance with previous codes. System appears to be functioning properly; no meior upgrading of the system is required et this time. Does not meat currant City standards m many respects relating to design, construction, or location. Appears to be operating adequately at this time, but has a relatively high potential lor future problems. No major upgrading of system is required at this time. System may or may not meat current City standards for design, construction or location, but is failing to properly treat and dilpoaa of the currant input, and is endangering e water supply, or is a source of pollution to surface or groumJwaters, or is creating a safety hazard, or is otharwisa creating e public nuisance. Please contact the City inspector to discuss system repair/ raplacamant procedures. If dratnfield replacement is necessary, soil testing will usually be required, and e design and site plan must be submitted for review. Your contractor must obtain a permit before work is started. SYSTEM CONDITION ( Q Checked items may require your action) Tank impaction indicatas: CS- Pumpout not needed at this time. □ SofMi accumulation in tanks indicates thev shouid be pump­ ed out this year to help prawant future problems. □ Solidi accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. T,.nkt should be pumped out as soon as possibla. □ Sytiam is discharging to surface. Tanks must be pumped syHMn 48 hours to aiimirtata surface discharge. □ impaction risara missing-tanks could not be inspected. Impaction risara 14" dte. pipe) must be installed in each tank at neat pumpout. If tanka have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now. □ Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle. (Does not give accurate measurement of solids accumulation.) If tanks have not been Dumped out withm the lest three veers, they should be pumped out now. DraMiald inspection indicates: V Orainfieid is dry, no surfacing evident. O Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. □ Orainfieid is saturated end visibiy discharging untreated effluent to the surface. This condition may require replace­ ment or additions to drainfield. Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repairs must ba complated within 90 days. O Orainfieid extent and condition unknown. NT! CHAWACTERtSTICS: Urntting Sita Eaetora □ Slopa □ Soil □ High watar tabia □ LotsiM □ Laka, seatland, or straam □ Orainaga Potential for System Failure (depends on soi( types, water table, anr* system condition) □ Low S Medium □ High n System is causing visible Site Capebiiiiies for Future Expansion □ Adequate GfFair □ Poor □ Inadequate COMMENTS ^ 'fid... & OaM of Inspection peptic System inspector NoM: In lha awot that this impaction report is uiad to satisfy the i-quirements for a mortgaga or other transfer of properly, be advised that g>is report doaa not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly, but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of tho aytwn undar current oonditiom based on the avaiiabla information This report must ba kept on the premises wuh system location and pumping records. WHITE COPY / Inspector s File GOLD COPY / Homeowner I. FMcrSl. nwte SSUB ^ ^ ^ CLc/^' *2 ___1 /?tC’/4.<yK Ch~CLto fic . ^ /33y~ ,^. ~^occ. cr(^ r.'. •>:!•'. ■,.'■• . S'.:-,--;,. ■ '^-J'' v.is :. j ;■; ‘ri'SW? yPik'* t '■ liSi --S^m tefc ;■; « ;,,|$*S:■ . I*a iiii'. ffili SrfeiWa V;^l:r:'i;v;-v. :'t:^;-.V:' iv ''T4 ; aeeociatipn ofmetropolifanmurucipalities BULLETIN November 16, 1990 TO: FROM: AMM Member City Officials *01/2 0 ■isso Peterson, Executive Director far Peterson, Director of Legislative Affairs RE: BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND TAB VACANCIES AND LEGISLATIVE CONTACTS 1. NOMINATIONS WANTED FOR BOARD VACANCIES: There are two vacancies on the AMM Board effective January 1991 as a result of the recent elections. Mayor Marilyn Corcoran of Dayton and Councilmember Bernie Peroz of Burnsville are leaving City Office at the end of this year. The persons selected to fill these vacancies will serve the balance of the terms and will be eligible for re-election. (One term ends in May of 1991 and the other ends in May of 1992). The AMM Board is responsible for the overall management of the AMM staff, implementation of the yearly work program, and annual budget. The Board meets the first Thursday evening of each month comencing at 7:00 P.M. THE BOARD IS SOLICITING NOMINATIONS VIA THIS BULLETIN AND WRITTEN NOMINATIONS INCLUDING A BRIEF RESUME SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO THE AMM OFFICE, ATTENTION OF VERN PETERSON, BY DECEMBER 17TH. 2. NOMINATIONS WANTED FOR TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD (TAB) VACANCY: There is one city vacancy on TAB as of January 1991 as well. Mayor Jim Krautkremer of Brooklyn Park and senior TAB member will be leaving city office at year's end. Metropolitan Area Cities are allocated ten positions on this very important advisory group and the AMM is responsible for making these nominations. To be eligible for nomination, you must be a Mayor or Councilmember. The TAB'S regular meeting is the third Wednesday afternoon of each month (usually from 2:00 to about 4:30 P.M.) in the chambers of the Metropolitan Council. The TAB provides general advice to the Metropolitan Council, RTB and MNDOT on -1- 183 university avenue east, st. paut. minnesota 55101 (612) 227-4008 Transportation matters and one of its most impoortant functions is to annually determine FAU projects funding priority.THE AMN BOARD IS SOLICITING NOMINATIONS FOR THIS VACANCY VIA THIS BULLETIN AND WRITTEN NOMINATIONS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO THE AMM OFFICE, ATTENTION OF VERN PETERSON, BY NO LATER THAN THURSDAY DECEMBER 17TH. 3. LEGISLATIVE CONTACT PROGRAM FOR 1991: The Legislative contact System first initiated for the 1988 Legislative Session and expanded for subsequent sessions has been designated as a high prio. ity by the AMM Board for the 1991 Session which convenes on January 8th. This program under the leadership of AMM Vice-President Bob Long and Boardmember Bill Barnhart is expected to be a major component of the AMM's Legislative Lobbying strategy for the 1991 session. As you may know, the primary objective of the Legislative Contact System is to get member city officials directly involved in the AMM's lobbying effort by having them contact local Legislators on key city issues in a timely fashion prior to and throughout the session. The first step in the process is for each member city to designate a Legislative Contact Person or to confirm that your 1990 contact person will again serve in that capacity. WE WOULD APPRECIATE IT IF EACH CITY MANAGER OR ADMINISTRATOR WOULD CONTACT ROGER PETERSON IN THE AMM OFFICE (227-4008) AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AND CONFIRM WHO YOUR CITY'S LEGISLATIVE CONTACT IS GOING TO BE FOR THE 1991 SESSION. The contact program is essential for the AMM's success and we \2j^g0 you to give this matter immediate attention. Attached is a brief description of the duties and responsibilities of a Legislative Contact person. 4. 1991 AMM LEGISLATIVE SESSION PRIORITIES: The AMM Board in early January will establish the final legislative policy priorities for the 1991 session. Straw ballots were sent to all member cities in October, as you may recall, giving member city officials, the opportunity to provide input into the priority setting process. The ballots were collected at the policy adoption meeting on November 1st. The seven highest policy priorities as voted by the member city officials are: Neighborhood Liveability, Levy Limit repeal, LGA continuation, TIF restoration, Metro Tax, Homestead Class Rates and Property Tax reform. The AMM's Legislative Coordinating Committee will review the -2- results of the membership straw vote on November 26th. and will make recommendations for the Board to consider. We will advise you after you after the Board has acted in early January. The AMM was very successful from a lobbying standpoint during the last two sessions by focusing most of our time and energies on a selected number of highly important issues. 5. METROPOLITAN APPOINTMENT'S REVIEW COMMITTEE: As recommended by the Mission and Membership Services Task Force and discussed at the November Policy Adoption Meeting, the Board is moving forward with the concept of an Appointments M«viev Committee to evaluate candidates for the Metropolitan Council and other Metropolitan Agencies. The Board will be inviting other organizations such as the Metropolitan Inter County Association, Citizens League and Metropolitan Area Leagues of Women Voters to join in the effort. Gloria Vierling, Board member and Shakopee Councilmember, has been appointed by the Board to Chair this committee. The size of the committee and the balance between the various organizations participating has not been determined as yet but the Board is looking for interested city officials to serve. PLEASE CONTACT VERN PETERSON IN THE ANM OFFICE BY NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 1, 1990 IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO BE CONSIDERED FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE METROPOLITAN APPOINTMENTS REVIEW COMMITTEE. DISTRIBUTION NOTE: This bulletin has been nailed to Mayors, Managers/Adninistrators and Legislative Contacts. We ask that it be copied and distributed to other city officials as appropriate. Thank you. -3- ^ J OO J /aJ .i .w.'./ Z- /<,//*• c/ ^/A A' /‘’ ^ '■' S^U»//et' ^cr/CAl 77 r' ^Jft^ ^<r1 /' Si»r ^ /7c: A'/’<rv.iv i.v--v-*J <7 <^<j^ /ii / ^</ ^ <?<’<' ^■’t ^^/e* /-r..y y^ ^,w< t»MliaiiiM«^all>« kl4i« <\imlVll)ns y / y J. y 1. /f'^/ 7/<r ^>/Aer-, ^c>»' /^*7if /<. cw^uf <• H tU^HMil rASr\MI KW y y/ - *•7^ , r^ S^*'c'/7 r , wi i.M.|a5:n fhmii; if OIL ■0! ijoiir fqndness (cye^y*») /(^ ''•5 (,y/y y/a/i/<s / /^^../r At ^4v4r^.i ^ . ^/c4fC f'tt//> fi' ,ps'- y'yi- H&.:^ P |:,‘ «.■ i" I? !?■■' l-f„ jMit «. GorMum 22U tlMTUOOO 10. WVZA1A, M SSSfl :"r S;-ii. '. ■ '. V-*' ./ I (^//i '■/ C^'/ 1'7/C C/i' /< /■ M7 c-A .i ■^■ Z't• <■{ />■ / /''''.7 .'■> T.,5.2; '5 ■ '"j rt;‘ ■ .................................................. . ..... . • - . -v*-~ . r;>,... ■ . .. . , . ■i'’ • :^rv:iS;AAVAi - ^ . n- - .. ; S&S»SSKfeE: HIrnm. i' .* ^tS • v**IC*y -Pia^rO^ An\^ • • •»■ -i r^-r’» -....-53:^ ^V •’;■ 7'.v,v---:.- .- ^ lii DATE: TO: FROM: November 14, 1990 Chief Kilbo Lt. Moran and Carol SUBJECT: Appreciation of Officer Marilyn De9ner of 142 South Brown Road called this morning to express her appreciation for the response of Officer Bruce Anderson to a medical at their residence on 11-5-90 when her husband^ Herbert, had suffered a stroke. Mrs. Degner stated Officer Anderson was very efficient and spent a great deal of time explaining thinas to her and was very com­ passionate of the situation. She stated he "went above and beyond the call of duty". ORONO POLICE DEPARTMENT control number ‘OCAl p.c . 1 I / r4! n\{n(T> , c^,fn ■ OUTFI^POPTEOiflW) time RPO (TRP □ /1 /. /I 11 Ajr\ /1 CCNT AGENCY NCC 'DENT C*G' M , N I 0 , 2 , 7 locaton qrino nbr >lgn) ALARM MEDICAL PLACE committed iPLC; { rS./'A um HHD SQUAOOBBAOG£»(Sawt TNIEASIG ^^a S) HME ah S ’A«) * ME CLR iTCl, M ISN UOC XS □/(3Z!/CIZ2zSS/E / ■ m UM DCSp/r~n/i . . . . i/Fi officer ^ 11 SOINC'PAL :00£ SUSPECT $*S victim «tC ASST REPORT PARTY RP ADMIN ACM OPEENOER OPP other OTH MO 0 arrest I " R r^LOi'\ RrJ Afl If----------‘■y 1 -y/'i i' ..p rf e 70 IL NAME (LAST. FMST wtllLE ' xa s£» i 1 1 Ph .Vi1 If----------------------------' 3T i :ip \ph A) j r " »MMe ilAST. first MIOOLEi ; ;ca ft*i HUi 1 PM ,VI If"i S' :p J PH |Q» HRD Coow P - PNjn# R-R k Jc A Alam - .n P?<Son V-ViSMt M-Mat T-Offwr crc C-; CITATION :warn :; OTmer REP0P ’’S IXIUOEO “OOvr^ . Pt35 i-veru.^ _. CofSAW . Acc<»« Reoa" >nnu**>c* Rtpod: ®NMos ■ ’«gs Corun v*»i Reoon OvenmeijUl ; ■’Oli C i* '. CMWOPAlAmi TYPE OF AURU WEATHER CONOITTONS MPmoR NTRUSICN normal WMONN holdup MOOERA'E J «P«lQOOnwMOOIIV EMERGENCY S-.EBE HEAVY RAINS etc mbhmcal malamthon ::TIRE tmmm OTHER ................WAIT FOR aEimOLDPR ’ ............ HIMTII tv Mm miAT A1 ARM rTP ■PvuotCERNAME . _ KMJBOCfMEOffT on«t _ AlCUANCE /Jc,r Hi treated released ambulance arrival time transported TO m^ritteyu □ soocas OTHER mem :C< sA~\ckp . ir;>i3L</g,. s Sid*WMcWTS- >- s!>iA.TTtm^> CK. S-X~\CV^P ^ S JgftT .S;i.'A / mJ i ' WEST SUBURBAN MEDIATION CENTER <AJ K^f'%. ■ '•VjMI i ii. 0 w '; Ci-riilK4len» Surti«r li»r SiiM'"'*« in lr.M I A. ,,,,, Ml Tidtis c i n. ilfMiiinimi Cnuiiiy. Hiniieioln iV'i- t #15^^1 t.o.l Dttcrlpuon ■ ■ ■ - !!r.!'.!K:,!i-::ni-iffl.r!.s::«i:iS!:.: ■ : ;■ < ! • • SE?K?K?:SS lnproycucnts or «ncroJCh«cnl$. ■ i.“,;-::,s:'ii'i.:;:i "Js-'-iU'ifitnj ”d^y regUteroU Und suryoyor under the leu* ot the Sute of MInnesoie. COFflll » CKOIIBEKO. IIIC. Hark i. GronbergTin. Lie. nu. ie/?» Engineers, Land Suryeyors. Monnirs • long uke, Hlnnesoia Dale : B-20-90 Scale: I” • SO- 0 : Iron marker Datum; Mean Sea level , ■, ‘Eilstlng conluurloriglnal I —aa>—: Proposed contour ,,,„,.d datum.Bearings snoen are based on an assumed datum. rsk $ S' I $ S i S'®'#- ■; o "Ai''- -I m / // / / / i m, ^ .3 (' . • !^: (JjVl I ('?.'•' Fa ^ 0|Jt:^£x4^jc=poU AjrpoJM^TURfJ ->«x>ip j « -------------------^P«^i.wa4yeWA.^4/,^l ^ :'rl fj i . ■ ::'%i>l !■■ iifS ■ "'ilf; th ■; ' :.ii'b •i.;r:./‘-'|4|if''- T :^: ■ :^: m^WIF'"^: 'FS:r: #: • ':" m. I 'M' *3»' \ l! pt£r^cr~ AtaAi' aeYcx.:^?- c.n'.- (v^' ^o'f _ ----\C^^ i PL-ASl |"»«©-o" Eicc-H fiPWS J ftX. ‘S>\TB PuA m "I5.iLa4 Ai. CfeyE-OPMgWr &t' ' a^Tss? A??' V .0? X ■ \«.r^ /I y y iSfl&TliJSj ^fSjtCES. '-■ S'^’ cs;;•«**>■:? KCUB "TO ^Sis^-iFUl-ST!! Ji? ^£-4-'>5^ Si-B//-- -rv.r -s^^^TS ^:^^l-v^^r'=. S/-2T /-S. --‘£.-= ^,r.;.?,./.'i.'.=r"i. /lifci '.'■' ■■ ■ V-. 'i ■tn^ ^ ..l^l : '. m, ■^3 * j A *■■ !■ A i ■ Jg wm- ■I ■ ' </,, “*■ . ■' / -:■ . ;, ^ ‘\'.M r--.; - ■ ■ *: III' ^rf\ ,4i