HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-05-13 Resolution 3723CITYof ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 8 7,2,3
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES
TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 9 (D) AND
SECTION 10.28, SUBDIVISION 5 (B)
FILE NO. 2124
WHEREAS, John P. Earling (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the
property located at 2165 Colin Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and
legally described as follows:
Lot 2, Block 2, Kelley Green, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the
property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal
Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) to permit construction of a detached garage to
be constructed in front of the front line of the residence where the Code would require
placement at the front line or behind residence structure. The structure will be located 12' from
an unimproved road outlot where Code would require 50'.
Mii►nesota:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
FINDINGS
This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2124.
2. The property is located in the RR -1B, Single Family Rural Residential Zoning
District requiring two acres in area. The property consists of two -plus acres.
3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on April 15, 1996
and recommended approval of the variances as proposed based upon the
follow',ig unique findings and hardships:
Page 1 of 5
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 379-3
A. The location of the well at the east side of the detached garage, location
of mature plantings within east yard and sloping topography prohibit
installation of a third stall.
B. Sloping topography to west and south restrict placement in west side yard
and south rear yard.
C. The location of plantings and sloping topography in northwest front yard
minimizes visual impact of 15' - 16' high structure upon residence to
immediate north.
D. 18' x 30' detached garage will be constructed of the same exterior
material used in principal structure.
E. The City has received no negative comments from residents within the
Kelley Green subdivision nor of residential property owners to west of
the property.
4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar
to it and do not apply generally to other property in this z. -.ung district; that
granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor
pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely
serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a
demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial
property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and
intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
S. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments
by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and
welfare of the community.
Page 2 of 5
10
/O O
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF HE CITY COUNCIL
�k 4 NO. .723
�t Eexo w�
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings and hardships, the Orono City
Council hereby grants a 38' setback variance per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28.
Subdivision 5 (B) and per Section 10.03, Subd. 9 (D) approves the placement of the detached
structure within the front/street yard 48' in front of the front line of the residence, subject to
the following conditions:
Applicant to provide an amended survey locating detached structure 12' from
unimproved extension road outlot. All overhangs or other structural
improvements attached to the structure shall meet approved 12' setback.
2. Applicant to provide a planting schedule upon application for building permit
specifying location and type of evergreen to be planted along north and west
side of structure.
3. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant,
but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building
permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will
expire on that date (May 13, 1997).
4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this
variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a
misdemeanor.
5. The undersigned arplicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms
of this resolution .md on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns,
hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution ir. the Chain of Title of the
property.
Page 3 of 5
I
`STATE OF MINNESOTA
004
r'�ESH0
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 372
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular
meeting held on the 13th day of May, 1996.
ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
Edward J. Call an, Jr., Mayor
The foregoin6 instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13th day of May,
1996 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of
Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the
City.
JAMIE I.. 80SMA Notary Public
• N01 NmESO1A
Mp Ca+�ssb�
�Mlti�>11.1000
Page 4 of 5
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. t$7:e3
On this .,'1I, day of 199 , before me a Notary Public within and
for said County, personally appeared \N t.. r ` Z" IL j L yti LA 1 � , --cam
known to me to be the person(s)"described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed.
tn�--------------
JAMIE L BOSMA
NOTARYR*JC-M W50TA
r HENNINN COUNTY ` r rrMY �COMMISSIM Expires Jan. 91, 20M '
•,-.- ���,. Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA
:S's
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
On this / day of _ j i i t , 199 f-• , before me a Notary Public within and
for said County, personally appeared / t < r ! ; � , (' t ( ( ; Q
known to me to be the person(s) descrilied in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed.
Fe
lwsilval
Not ry Public '
Page 5 of 5