HomeMy WebLinkAboutTest Pit ReportSUBTERRANEAN ENGINEERING CORP.
6875 HIphwey No. 65 N.E. P.O. Box 32371
s'sti: MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55432 574-1242
COMPACTION QUALITY CON-rROL TESTS
Project BE-r"L MUITION 1
Report No.
WOW, r11 NN:SUFA
- Job No. x-uQ)rT3
Sand Cone Method r�r Indicated Percerrt Compaction: ASTM
Nuclear u % Max. Modified Proctor Dry Density D-1557
Other ❑ ❑ % Max Standard Proctor Dry Densitv D-698
Test
No.
AND OR
REI OWWet
E
Density
01 Total
Sample
I tludlnq Stone)
MOISTURE
CONTENT
%
pry Densitypare
Corrected
For 51nne
ryREMARKS
Dry penury
p c r
('a vactb•.
RECOMMENDATIONS
GraOe
Grade
Fi II Sur lace
r1AY 27,
1988
1
-4'
130.0
16.9
111.2
118.5
94
2
-1'
125.9
14.9
109.6
118.5
92
ll SUBTERRANEAN ENGINEERING CORP.
6875 Highway No. 65 N. E. P.O. Box 32308
r MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55432 Phone: 574-1242 DATE
EARTH WORK OBSERVATION REPORT �iI/ iL7.P901
I
UL I I VOL L 11
Job Name _V,� �� I�Q Job No. p
58 03_
OBSERVE
p---- _ _
Job Location .S�11�� Qp�,�� Ld�E'L�EtL
EXCAVATION
Earthwork
('
Contractor S /�m._/�._��GA1[._. client E'(
Block
---C U.If�-F2S
Arrive Job AL30 �%
Mileage
Plat
. _>��MI
I Total
Depart Job 1 --,5 Travel Time Chargeable 2
FILL PLACEMENT
—L� Hours
Lot
Y J
Lab. Time Zhr-
Total Hours ��// Eng'r
Block
On Job _-_ I�-. Report Time ___y Review Time —
Plat
Summary of Technical and /or Engineering Services performed Including Field Tost Onto, Locations,
Elevations. and Depths are estimated. THE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY STATEMENTS
ON THE REVERSE
SIDE OF THE COMPACTION QUALITY CONTROL
TEST REPORT CONSTITUTE AN INTEGRAL PART HEREOF.
I. Excavation Is feet deep at feet deep
- Elevation end , gnding to at end
Elevation
2. Side Slopes are approx.: vert. [) 1/2 horiz.: lverl. L7 1 horl-. 1 vert. ❑
E
2 horiz: 1 vert. U flatter than 2:1 ❑ other _
3. Construction Staking Is: adequate [] not available r) ) Incomplete [ )
C
4. Excavation Is oversized feet outside of building Ilnes.
S. Excavation Is: dry U wet fI
A
So. Water is seeping from _ -_
V
5b. Depth of water In excavation approx.
A
T
5c. Dewatering Is: necessary C7 not required U
1
S• Excavation Is with : drogline U backhoe U scraper U dozer ❑
7. All unsuitable Solis have been excavated. YES C) NO ❑
O
Nsoil
74• - _ het of remains to be removed.
B. Soli at excavation bane Is:
Silty Clay [I Sandy Clay ❑ Clayey Slit ❑ Silty Sand ❑
Clayey Sand U Clean Sand E] Sandy Silt O
O• - -. ..--- __._ - feet of fill required to reach design subgrade.
10. Excavation Is: Approved ❑ Not Approved ❑ for fill and/or footing placement
1 1. FIII Is -AgQvv�O ��i_. - G O �/-- ---- - -- (type of soil)
11a. !mported ❑ On-site borrow K /
11b. Compaction Is with sheepsfoot roller ❑ manual tamper ❑ vibratory ❑
F
smooth drum roller U self-propelled ❑ non -vibratory ❑
1
12. Performed _2— field density testa. See Compaction Quality Control
L
L
Test Report No. m
13. feet of fill L 1 J
-�'4 remains to be placed.67NnA6L .Roo,
14. Density tests most compaction specifications. YES jC NO 0
14e. Test No's. _. _ did not meet compaction specifications.
15.Addltionai obeervallons arl to t are required, YES NO WILL CALL ❑
C
DEWATERING:
FROST
PROTECTION:
AJACENT
STRUCTURES:
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
P N
ED
well points L)
strew ❑
-- -- --
Hot ❑ Dry
C
—deep wellsU
loose soil ❑
WarmRain
I T
L
open ditch ❑
frost rlppinq []
within 20 feet f 1
-
Cnal Ianew rl
1
temp.
N
sump Pump ❑
heat ❑
20-40 feet U
j 32'F ❑
S
other ❑
blankets ❑
40 or more toot U
Sub -freezing❑
REr:OMMENDATIONS/SUMMARY/WORK PROG ESS:
1`��TS COI Doi
(� —co
� —
Oi
S 1I�.ra r_
DISTRIBUTIO�fjjl,
-_2, cc:
cc: ARM 70i1A--rI CISS
-- -----
by —
—_ cc: —
S*rrn ngineering Corp.
__ cc*