Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 5586 Y ♦ � O� � o � � �� z � CITY of ORONO � � . � ��, � �� ti ti RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ��`qk'E58�g'�G NO. 5 5 8 � . A RESOLUTION GR.ANTING ' A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-418(3) � FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 177 GLENDALE DRIVE � FILE NO. #07-3267 WHEREAS, Bohland Development, Inc. has filed a zoning application on behalf . of Calvin Presbyterian Church of Orono (hereinafter the "applicant") for the property located at 177 Glendale Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Lot 2, Block 1, Glendale Cove,Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter"the property"); and • � WHEREAS,the applicant has applied to the City for a conditional use permrt per Orono Zoning Code Section�.78-418(3) to allow construction of a detached storage garage on the property, and for a variance to said Section to allow the garage to be located 45' from the side , property line where a 50' setback for all structures is normally required; and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 20, 2007, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and � NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File#07-3267. 2. The property is located in the RR-1B Zoning District and the church operates as a conditional use subject to the standards of Zoning Code Section 78-418(3), which require a conditional use permit for all new construction and require tha't all structures other than residences on the property be located at least 50' from any lot line. • ' Page 1 of 6 , � °� . . • o . o '� CITY of ORON4 z � -- : . � , ti ��L �G'�' RESOLUTION OF T�H�E C18T�Y COUNCIL `9kESI��g' NO. 5 . 3. The Orono Planning Commission re'viewed this application at a public hearing held on February 20, 2007 and voted 7-0 to �recommend approval of the 'conditional use permit and variance as requested,based on the following findings: a) The proposed garage will replace (or relocate) an existing garage on the property which was approved via CUP in 1990, but the location of which has now become non-conforming as a result of the development of Glendale Cove. b) The existing 24'x24' garage will be relocated (or a new garage will be constructed) directly to the northwest of the main church building and 45' from the west property line. c) The proposed new garage location will be easily accessible from an existing driveway and parking area. The garage will be visible from Glendale Drive, but , should be relatively inconspicuous from most neighboring homes, due to its • location and due to existing vegetative screening to its west and northwest. The existing garage is relatively low in profile, having a peak height of abo.ut 14', and will not extend to a height where it would become more visible. The proposed ' similar colors to the church building will help to limit any visual impacts of the garage. - d) The level of activity associated with use of the garage is expected to be minimal, hence Planning Commission finds that the standards for granting a CUP are generally met. . e) The location of the garage 45' instead of the required 50' from the west lot line is due in part to the location of the existing driveway/parking area and due to the dimensions of the garage. The parking area curb is about 74' from the lot line, and with a proposed garage setback of 5' from the curb, a garage 24' in depth encroaches 5' into the 50' setback requirement. The impacts of this encroachment are minimal. 4. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will the proposed use depreciate surrounding property values, and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive • Plan of the City. � Page 2 of 6 � � � °� • o o - ' � CITY of ORONO � � - ; - � - , ti ti RESOLUTION OF T��I��COUNCiL ���kESII�4�G NO. . 5. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council's approval or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (March 12, 2008). � 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. • � Adopted by the Orono City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of March, 2007. ATTEST: � ,���/ ���. ��� Linda S. Vee, City Clerk ames M. White,Mayor ���������� . Pro�wn� � • . Pa�e 4 of 6 � � °� . • o 0 �� � � CITY of ORONO s . ,� , � . , ti ti RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL � ��`�kEsKog'�G rvo. '� 5 8 � STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN . � The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of March, 2007 � by James M. White, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. No-tary Publi • . JACt�UE�VN �A. YO�NG lVoRar,y���:�:9ic-t�J�ln��sota . w� My GC►fimt8&'Ofr i:tqal;fly JQ��31,8010 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _ �. / ' day of March, 2007 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. � L����� � . `� RACHEL DODGE Notary Public NOTARY PUBUC=MINNESOTA ` .;,,;:�. My Commission Expires Jan.31,2010 • • Page 5 of 6 . � �� � Q O �� CITY of ORONO l . � � � �� G~' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL �`�kEsKOg'� rvo. � 5 8 6 . . � STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN , This instnunent was acknowledged before me this h day of �� �� l , 2007 � bY �.��� `� e-�— `��r� , the �� S�l31'1 of Calvin Presbyterian Church of Orono, on behalf of the Church. .r_�;s.� /�� i�% �`r��: RACHELDODGE }, �-. t, �;"�"�"�� s NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA NOt�PUUIIC • � �;:;��.��..s T My Commission Expires Jan.31,2010 r�..�. � Page 6 of 6 , i • . ' • . _ . . 07 . t . j� . . . SURVEY FOR. � EXHIBIT A � '; �f�`B`"°'�°P r� �: G L E N D A i�E� H O M E S � . .?�soLUTioN No. • ' RDADWAY'•—� i• .--S 89°20' 25" � ' • , . , � � � � GLENDALE. COVE� � , . . � . ���� o.° Z�� . �. - . . ; , � .. . � . . , ;: o � f, MINNESOTA. �• �� � . �:. � . . � .. , � � a.W,�; . . . f N ; i------�—;•— --- --------------�--` ' • , , . , . . . . : 'Q,z:> a �,�'.. 0.N. � � � , .,� ��� ' N . , . . . • . � a O �. } sp�(5� 'a � . � .` �� �P��`� . . : :�� 5.8.,.6� .. . � a���; , x =�: � --._... � . . � . w � � . . . 5�-��°' � � . .. � . � .. . : .. � . . �� � �:z •z z w ��. , � . ... � .. . . . . o.� .�. . M i ' • . . . ', . . ', �:�,p. � � � � . . . '' .' . ' �1. N I . • . . . � . , • • . .. • .. . I .:. . I • .• ' . • . ;'. ' • ' ..�:.o g ' � I � �� ,. �• , . ,• ' �o g,y. � BLACKTOP ' • ' ' o . � lo! � PARKING LOT . � � ' • � .'. . • , ' I. ;4 J � ' ' , ' . • .. . . : . • , . . . . . ' � �.a � . � � �.. . .. • . raoPOSm '. w j caucE � . • .. , • . • . «.. � Oi— 'v ' � . " ' . . • : . . . . .�,�`cJ � . . Q i • ° � . � . ' . ..' ': • . . : • • 5�4��. 0 U B �._B B 1 A • U'�..•,.'•. O I , . • o � . ' • . : . •• • • '� :.: •:.:: . I: . • • - • • � � z ,�� . EXISTING � _ .. � .. � : .. . .:: �� :: : ----L� :,�_ . CHURCH .� � � . � . � � : � -r � , ' . . ���':,4�a. IF ' .. ' ' .. . ' ' F i BUILGING". � . . ' � � �: . . �� �»� � � . � ' � � . � � ��'. � io . , . . . .. �-� . � 5� - ,' . � . . � � � �� �. �. .� � �, . . � . . . .... ;,, �� . . . , . . . .. . ��,. o,,, . . . . . . . . . . .. . . , . . . ,, . . .. � � . � ul �`/� • \\� , ' ' . , . •. ���� .• n 8 . S� a�� r 63 �� g��x -- � �lR. a, `. • . : �� :. �� � . ;� �; : � .. .. � : : .��s�. . � �>>so�s ��\ . . . . . . . ���. � �r � Q. � , . • , , . • RE� $ . • 'Y�,,�J � � • ' • ' . � . ' . . o ; ,,7 �X: � • • • . • , • • � �$ ,�' � . . . . , . . . . ��.° � �; .• ` i ��� . s � � `�\ . , . ; . : . .. . . �T�� . , C1 � � � . � .. . � . . . . , =e� � /I O �O �\ I . .. . . Q�� . N � i �� ��� � i : ' . : .: . ...• ' .� .�. .�• . . ' `srs`��. ' • � \ , . . � � � \ ' . ' • ' . � . , .. � Y��` � \\ ��y ' . . .. ��..g`c°��`�u°��. � W g� `� � - , . . . , . . . . . ���� �� ? . . , . . . • . . �' �� � � . . . • �i/ ���;6, \\� �oamnc 1 � ' • • . .: • .' � • • . : . i t� P I cnruce � on assumed datum. • ' ' • . , � '�Q�'' ��\�� rt°�a�vm I ' ' • •' . : . . .. � • ' �O v= o s of the above described property, • . ' ,' • . • � 0 � iq, two parking bts, a concrete ' , ' • , . ' . • • �: jved, �d the proposed location ' ,", • . • Z��� . -..__.N E does not purpert to show , , , , . .• • oachments. , , . : , • . • _ 50 � ' • • ' . . . • . .. . . ' .. , � ' m. .. . I . • . .. • . � . . . _ . o . . . . �. � . , .. _. .... . . . .. . . :� . . . . '•I . . . ... � . , . . .. ... . . ..... . . I '