HomeMy WebLinkAboutConditional Use ApplicationVillage of Orono
.Conditional Use Application
Directions to Applicant:
For Official Use On
Name
Case No.
a. Fill out this form in duplicate by typing or
printing in ink. If the spaces provided are
insufficient, use additional sheets, keying
information, to the proper iterr, number.
b. Attach all supplementary material by paper clip.
c. File duplicate applications and filing fee ($L%
With Zloning Administrator.
//
a ht' t6u�
Name /of Owner: (Last) -F—irstJ• (Middle)
2. Address of -owner: (No. and Street) (City and Zone) (Phone)
13A Chi
Street Address o
roperty Involved:
O / � - _0Vj � 0 I✓ d a ��n 0 �'
4. Legs Descrira oA of Property Invol%, d:
5. Does this prcperLy bond--�r on or lie partially wit',ij:, in
adjoining municipality?
6 . Present U:�c• : 7. -1)
roposed Me: C Datu Property
Acquired:
Present Zo;iing District: 10. Requested conditional use is
authorized under the follow-
ing sections of Zoning Ord-
inance
11. What are the requirements of the or finance sections listed
in Item 10? J/
2. For what period of time is the con itional Use requested?
!-Joe- Md &A--a-� &L -d .
t'
1 Has an appli tion for a condional use permit on the same
property bee acted utan by the Village Council within the
last six months? If so, state the date of the Village
Council's action. / D
VOTE: The law requires that the conditions set forth Tn the
following three items 14, 15 and 16 MUST be established
before a conditional use can be granted. Explain in
detail after each statement wherein ycur case conforms
to the requirements.
Ac&o--r-d with Purposes of Zoning Code. The proposed location
of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of
the Zoning Code and the purposes of the district in which the
site is located. Explains
CL---, 5bo l e-1 )0�1 o
7h0 ✓e- of / /J-. 6, ,1 '0 L4 Co •-, sf n iQe !D tic 6e✓�4
: S J d f. l /1 Q re- of Q O✓ 5 �t r b��l 5 �J`�✓ f �Q � �` O (%� :
L � {
f
W:
v
15. Public Health, Safety and Welfare. The proposed lo::ation o£
the conditional use and the proposed condition under which it
would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to
the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious
to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Explain.
Compliance with Zonin Co e. The proposed conditional use
WnI comply with each or the applicable provisions of the
Zoning Code. Explain.
y
� r
NOTE: The o lowing material must be attached to this applica-
tion:
17. A map or plat showing the property affected and all lands
withip 300 feet of the boundaries of the property affected.
18. An abstractors certified property certificate listing the
names of the property owners within 300 feet of the outer
bo"dary of the property in question.
19. Detailed plans and drawings showing the proposed develop-
ment.
20. Acknow a gment_ and Signature: The undersigned ere y repre-
sents upon all of the penalties of law, for the purpose of
inducing the Village of Orono to take the action herein re-
quested, that all statements herein are true and that all
work herein mentioned will be done in accordance with the
ordinances of the Village of Orono and the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
Date -Signature
For Offi-cial Comments Only:
D
m
D
0
S
m
0
M
z
0
m
—oz -n
m m 0
_<m$
X A r D
XC
to
a�T
n 00
o$ 0
0
z<��
r*
A G)
^' m m
N �
A
D
r
m
O
m
m N
� O
0
ri
N �
A
D
r
m
O
m
m N
� O
0
2 3an91j
O
m
O>
=O
z ZL�
m 0cc
n Zto
O Zc
C. m'�
-♦ (A o
< O'er
.4 ^'
0
n
m
D
CO
m
D
m
m
D
Cn
m
m
m
0
c
m
z
0
v
D
Stage, MSL Elevotwn
t0 O � N W if
O O O 0
VILLAGE OF ORONO
Regular Meeting of the Village Council,
October 26, 1970
The Village Council met on the above date
with the following members present: Mayor
Oberhauser, Councilmen Butterfield and
Searles. Absent: Councilmen Franzel and
ScCarthy. .
Searles moved, Butterfield seconded, that
the ;•tinutes of the Regular 'lceting of
October 12, 1970, be approved. `lotion,
Ayes (3) - Nays (0).
?•irs. Douglas Head, Jr., President of
Minnesota Concern, presented the Village
of Orono with a letter of commendation
regarding the adoption of the phosphate
ordinance.
Searles moved, Butterfield seconded, that
the conditional use Dermit for Ray Waterhouse,
132 Chevy Chase Drive, for a fill permit,
be approved. Aotioi. , Ayes (3) - Nays (0) .
Searles moved, Butterfield seconded, that
the request of Richard Edwards, 3485-3S4S
Shoreline Drive, to renew his conditional
use permit for one year to November 10,
1971, with an upper limit of 16 units
per acre, but no guarantee of any set number
of units per acre, be approved. ,lotion,
Ayes (3) - Nays (0).
Searles moved, Butterfield seconded, that
the request of Van Dale for rezoning of
the Holter property, 2765-2785 Wayzata
Boulevard, to "I" zoning;, subject to
agreed side -lot setback on west border,
adjacent to Old Crystal Bay Road, of
100 feet, be approved. Aotion, Ayes (3)
Nays (0).
Searles moved, Butterfield seconded, to
refer the question of the setback of
commercial property and consideration
of amanding zoning code to require up
to 100' setback to the Planning Commission.
1"•1otion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0).
7:30 P.1.
'•1I NUTES
1INNFSOTA CONCERN
CONDITIONAL USE PER'1IT
132 Chevy Chase D 've
CONDITIONAL USE PER`TIT
348S-3545 Shoreline Drive
REZOi4ING TO "I" DISTRICT
2765-278S Wayzata Blvd.
COTIERCIAL SETBACKS
The rainfall for the 500 -year frequency event was estimated
by extrapolation of the 10-, 50, and 100 -year frequency
events on probability paper. The 24-hour storm was determined to
be critical for the area at Chevy Chase Drive, the ponds east of the
French Lake area, the unnamed tributary to Stubb's Bay, and the
area near Carman Bay. The 10 -day snowmelt event was determined from
the S.C.S. National Engineering Handbook (Reference 7) to be
critical for the ponds east of the French Lake area. The amount of
runoff for the 25-, 50- and 100 -year event was determined from the
Soil Conservation Service's National Engineering Handbook (Reference
7) for the ponds east of the French Lake area. The discharges for
the 10- and 500 -year frequency events were estimated by extrapolating
the 25-, 50- and 100 -year frequency events on probability paper.
Stage -discharge and stage -storage relationships were developed
for each hydraulic structure in the watersheds of the area at
Chevy Chase Drive, the ponds east of the French Lake area, and the
unnamed tributary to Stubb's Bay by using 2 -foot contour maps
developed from aerial photography (Reference 2), field investiga-
tion, U. S. Geological Survey topographic maps (Reference 10),
and culvert nomographs (Reference 18). Only stage -storage
relationships were developed for the ponds near Carman Bay since
the pord4 were considered land -locked. The previously mentioned
aerial photography and U. S. Geological Survey topographic maps
were used to determine the stage -storage relationships in addition
to a field investigation of the study area. The stage -discharge
and stage -storage relationships for the area at Chevy Chase Drive
and the unnamed tribunary to Stubb's Bay were made a part of
the TR -20 hydrologic computer model of the study areas.
For the ponds east of the French Lake area and the ponds near
Carman Bay, computations were made by iterative methods to develop
the water surface elevations for the selected frequencies. Inflow
into the first of the series of ponds was calculated by using the
TR -20 computer program (Reference 5). Culvert nomographs
(Reference 18) and standard routing methods were used to develop /
%pfd• :tiK
-41 ��./ •L
8 �
3
These elevations, together with the flood plain management measures
required by Section 1910.3 of the program regulations, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean the community
must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their
flood plain management requirements. The community may at any time
enact stricter requirements on its own, or pursuant to policies established
by other :a3eral, State, or regional entities. These proposed eleva-
tions will also be used to calculate the appropriate flood insurance
premium rates for new buildings and their contents and for the se-.ond
layer of insurance on ex=sung buildings and their contents.
The proposed base (100 -year) flood elevations for selected locations
are:
Source of Flooding
Unnamed Tributary to Stubbs
Bay, Lake Minnetonka
Pond E
Pond F
w.
Pond B
Pond A
Pond C
Elevation, feet,
National Geodetic
Wcation Vertical Datum
Tonka Avenue
936
Crestview Avenue
940
Leaf Street crossing at
931
approximately 2300 feet
above the mouth
y59
Watertown Road
970
Shoreline
964
Shoreline
961
Shoreline
931
Shoreline
931
Shoreline
931
too YR
FJOVA
ELt V
�� pG
9�s
selected is based on existing legal, economic, political and
hydraulic factors. The floodway was evaluated to determine the
t effects of possible future floodplain encroachment. The designated
{ floodways meet applicable land use standards of both the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources and the Federal Insurance
Administration. The results of these computations are tabulated
for the unnamed tibutary to Stubb's Bay (Table 2). The floodway
boundaries are shown on the Floodway Boundary and Floodway Map
(Exhibit 8).
The area between the floodway and the boundary of the 100 -year
flood is termed the flood fringe. The flood fringe thus encompasses
the portion of the floodplain that could be completely obstructed
without increasing the water surface elevation of the 100 -year
f- )d more than one-half foot at any point. Typical relationships
between the floodway and the flood fringe and their significance
to floodplain development are shown in Figure 6.
Because the current floodway definition does not apply to lakes. a
floodway was not evaluated in. -areas such as those that may be
4.2 .
inundated by flood waters from Lake Minnetonka, the area at Chevy
Chase Drive, the ponds east of French Lake, and the Carman Bay area.
Thus, no floodway was Fre-erect For the area along the shoreline
of Lake Minnetonka, the area at Chevy Chase Drive, the ponds east
of French Lake, and the Carman Bay area where flooding results
from high lake levels rather than from high stream flow. Devel-
opment in these areas are regulated by Minnesota Shoreland
Regulations (Reference 20).
5.0 INSURANCE APPLICATION
The Federal Insurance Administration has developed a process to trans-
form the data from the engineering study into flood insurance criteria
to establish actuarial insurance rates. This process includes the
determination of reaches, Flood Hazard Factors, and flood insurance
zone designations for each flooding source affecting the City of Orono.
18
delineated using the flood elevations and two -foot topographic
maps at a scale of 1" - 200' made from aerial photographs taken
in the fall of 1975 (Reference 2). In cases where the 100 -year
and the 500 -year flood boundaries are close together, only the
100 -year boundary has been shown.
For the ponds studied by approximate methods, the boundaries of
the 100 -year flood were estimated using a U. S. Geological Survey
topographic map (Reference 10) enlarged to a scale of 1" - 500'
with 10 -foot contour intervals (Exhibit 9).
4.2 Floodways
Encroachment on floodplains, such as artificial fill, reduces the
flood -carrying capacity and increases flood heights, thus increas-
ing flood hazards in areas beyond the encroachment itself. One
aspect of floodplain management involves balancing the economic
gain from floodplain development against the resulting increase in
flood hazard. For purposes of the Flood Insurance Program, the
concept of a floodway is used as a tool to assist local communities
in this aspect of floodplain management. Unier this concept, the
area of the 100 -year flood is divided into a proposed floodway and
a flood fringe. For streams, the floodway is the channel cf a
stream plus any adjacent floodplain areas that must be kept free of
encroachment in order that the 100 -year flood can be carried with-
out substantial increases in flood heights. Criteria adopted by
the Federal Insurance Administration limits such increases in
flood heights to 1.0 foot, provided that hazardous velocities are
not produced. In Minnesota, floodplain encroachment is limited
by Minnesota Regulations to that which would cause a 0.5 foot in-
crease in the flood heights at any point and is, therefore, the
briterion adopted for this study.
After consultation with representatives of the Minnesota Department
Of Natural Resources, responsible city officials have designated
floodways for the unnamed tributary to Stubb's Bay. The floodway
17
PROPOSED FLOOD ELEVATION DETERIMINATIONS FOR
THE CITY OF ORONO, HENMEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AGENCY: Federal Insurance Administration, FOD.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY:
Technical information or comments are solicited on the prooesed
base (100 -year) flood elevations listed below for selected locations in
the City of Orono, Hennepin County, '•_-nrescz_a.
These base (100 -year) flood elevations a -re he basis for the flood
plain management measures that the co.: un t is required to ether adopt
i
Ior show evidence of being already in effect it er'er to qualify or
Iremain qualified for participation in the-:at_cral Flood In -znce
Program (NFIP) .
DATES:
11
The period for comment will be ninety (90) days following the
second publication of this proposed rule in a newspaper of local circulation
in the above-named community.
K
ADDPES`' ES :
Flaps and other information showing the detailed outlines of the
flood -prone areas and the proposed base (100 -year) flood elevations are
available for review at City Hall, Orono, Minnesota.
Send con-nents to: Mayor Brad Van Nest, P. O. Box 66, Crystal Bay,
Minnesota 5-5323.
FOR FURTHER TN: WL4ATI ON CO`: _ R 2: :
Mr. Richard Krirm, _r, _ss; -_A_-j- Administrator
Office of Flood Inslaranc_
(202) 755-5581 or To!! ___a Line (Bi -8872
Room 5270
451 Seventh Street, SW.
Washington, D.C. 20410
SUPPLEI.jE ac2`1 INFORMA^LION:
The Federal Insurance Ad..-ainistrator gives notice of the proposed
determinations of base (100 -year) flood elevations for the City of Orono,
Minnesota, in accordance with section 110 of the Flood Disaster Protec-
tion Act of 1973 (Pub. L. 93-234), 87 Stat. 980, which added section
1363 to the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (Title XIII of the
Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 (Pub. L. 90-448)), 42 U.S.C.
4001-4128, and 24 CFR 1917.4(a).
These elevations, together with the flood plain management measures
required by Section 1910.3 of the program regulations, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean the community
must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their
flood plain management requirements. The community may at any time
enact stricter requirements on its own, or pursuant to policies established
by other iaceral, State, or regional entities. These proposed eleva-
tions will also be used to calculate the appropriate flood insurance
premium rates for new buildings and their contents and for the second
laver of insurance on ex -sting buildings and their contents.
The p=oaosed base (100 -Lear) flood elevations for selected locations
are:
Source of Flooding
Unnamed Tributary to Stubbs
Bay, Lake Minnetonka
Pond E
Pond F
Pond B
Pond A
Pond C
I
Elevation, feet,
National Geodetic
Location Vertical Datum
Tonka Avenue
c
3
940
These elevations, together with the flood plain management measures
required by Section 1910.3 of the program regulations, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean the community
must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their
flood plain management requirements. The community may at any time
enact stricter requirements on its own, or pursuant to policies established
by other iaceral, State, or regional entities. These proposed eleva-
tions will also be used to calculate the appropriate flood insurance
premium rates for new buildings and their contents and for the second
laver of insurance on ex -sting buildings and their contents.
The p=oaosed base (100 -Lear) flood elevations for selected locations
are:
Source of Flooding
Unnamed Tributary to Stubbs
Bay, Lake Minnetonka
Pond E
Pond F
Pond B
Pond A
Pond C
I
Elevation, feet,
National Geodetic
Location Vertical Datum
Tonka Avenue
936
Crestview Avenue
940
Leaf Street crossing at
approximately 2300 feet
above the mouth
q S 4
Watertown Road
970
Shoreline 964
Shoreline 961
Shoreline 931
Shoreline 931
Shoreline 931
4
Source of Flooding
Pond D
Pond G
Pond H
Carman Bay Take Minnetonka
West Arm � ':e Minnetonka
North Aran Lake Minnetonka
Crystal Bay, Lake Minnetonka
Elevation, feet,
National Geodetic
Location Vertical Datum
Shoreline 931
Shoreline 936
Casco Point Road 935
approximately 500 feet
southwest along the
road from its intersec-
tion with Frederick
Street
Shoreline 931
Fage=ness Point Road 931
approximately 550 feet
southwesterly along
the road from its
intersection with
Concordia Street
Shoreline 931
Shoreline 931