HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-08-18 Memo, Assembly PermitC:^.v . ^ •♦ ' *.V' *w ■ r^»
TO: *Walter R. Benaon, City Adainistrator
Bruce D. Malkerson, City Attorney
A. P. Olaon, Asst. Zoning Adidnistrator
August II, 1976
Qut<loor Party Proposed ior August 28, 1976 at
4220 Baysids Road
(Vier: R 6 B fielding COnpany - 432 Midland Bank Bldg.
MbneapoUs, Minnesota 5S401
Praoters: Paul C. Voigt > 4S20 Bayside Hoad
Nsple Plain, Minnesota 5S3S9
Ibdd W. lilies • 3022 Westwood Road
Mand, Minnosota 5SS64
Lils propoaed party cj
^k^c^August 9-13 attached flyer. Tlie Large teseoHy Permit
bemds, certificato of insurance or fin.
location of tlie proposed party is a rental famstead just east of Ski Tcsika
imadiatply west of the snarp bend in Bayside Road.
The location
ancl
ZoT ing: RR-IA Single PaniW Ri^sidntial and United Agricultural Usage.
Possible zoning cooslderations or violations:
1.l ondltiorial Use Remit required for "Rocreation Areas" 37.720
and >4.026. No such permit nor spplic ition Is on file with
the City.
2.;oiso - 37.020: No use shall be operated such that m ise
msulting fron said use is perceptible beyond the boiaidaries
of tJiat plat line. With four banda sdieduled, this my well
be violated. A previoua large party at this location on
July 9, 1976, reaultad in several citizen ooeplaints and a
fornal conpluint against Mr. Voigt by Officer Bummter.
3.Traffic Control • 37.150: The traffic generated by any use
shall be diamelized and controlled in a nmor that will
avoid congestion on pvhllc streets, safety hazards, or
exoassive traffic through residential streets. The expected
800-1,000 people wo|ild fodicate extreno problens netting this
zoning requiremont because Bayside Road is a windfog, residen
tial street with manerous access driveways, hills and sharp
curves.
to the attention of_tha PoUoe Departamt early in the
» Large Asseably Rarmit
August 13, ninus the r3quired
V.'
■'n
1 \
'»• *-
■ 'f-W
4.Pood Service Proposal; The proposed concession stand would,
in fact, be a restaurant (Class II) which is allowed only in
the B-1 zone. It would, Aerefore, be contrary to the code
to operate that faclli^ in this residential zone.
' ?i *iI
■p V
■ v; •
w ...
.,T. .fA v-v» : ;,"1K.. ^
-2-
Lane Assqj>ly Ordinice Oiapter <9
69.060
-JA'.
69.070
C9.080
Lane Asaeadblies f»rmittad only after Comcil raviaw of factors affecting
public He^tb» safety, and wlfine. Flyers aimotaicing the proposed party
1^!
'wuaAfceap ^ rxT^io ailll%M«lVUIK WiC piV|IU3VU uarVf
and offering tidcets for sale ueye circulated prior to the City receiving
an asseni>ly application.
taquifed Iso.00 £m has not yet been suhaitted.
*
a) Secure fence as re<paiied is not in existence.
b)
b)
i)
k)
l)
Botable water requircamts have not been net. Water carrier is
believed to be a roadway sprinkler, not a sanitized carrier.
Me fiealtfi Departnent certification has been received.
Four portable toilets are proposed. Hie State Building Code for
teaiiorary facilities requires one toilet for each 30 persons,
one urinal for each 30 Arsons, and one driidcing fountain for
each 100 persons. Ihis would be 33 toilets, 16 urinals and 10
drinking fountains for the proposed 1,000 persons.
Solid waste disposal for 1,000 persons (over 1 ton estinate by
Ordinance) seean inaufficient if gaifaaga cans are the only nethod
propose!.-
e)IWo lights shown on siindttal will not sufficiently illtaninate th-3
parking area, such less the renainder of the assenhly area.
f)
«)
Security nust bo approved by the IHilice Departnent.
Hic control center proposal does not contain my interoon or
internal security coraanicatlon syston.
Tlie required |S,000 bond has not been siimdtted. Insurance is
indicated, but no cartificates have been sutaitted.
liealth care: no physicim or anbulmce service is listed; nurses
are nentioned, but not identified. No covered treatswit center i)
indicated.
j)Parking is indicacad in the sme area as the assenbly. Ihe Polico
Departrent sam that a previous party here had only 3S0 cars and
they Msre parked across Bayiidt Road ss well as on this property.
Telephones lisfod are not lodated on the layout and are not shown
to be on a saparat# line.
listed.
m
1.y i
■ -yr*-- ^
•' V’:;<
: ’’i -i’
V,
if
f U
■ ' ■ • U^if' ‘Li
V -•A
W. V:-mm
f* '
Fire protection is indicated to be the sane water tanker as used for
potable siqpply. No «n|»ing or fire fitting equioaent or plans wore
submitted. No fire lane is shown and no fim tilting personnel ire
-ti '-Mi-
-5-
n) No appliamt hardship has been indicated idiidi would warrant any
reducticn in oxdinanca requii«HDnts .
'.f'
65.110 a) An assedbly application is required to be siteitted 30 days prior to
■ ■ “ ' licithe scheduled event. Iha City ledeived this inconplete applicatirm
on ;\upist 13, 1976, IS days prior to the amoinced date. The
■pplicatian is still inconplete.
c*4) The qiplication states that the party will be a dance md "benefi c",
hut does not indicate «diat charity or group will 'henefit*'. No
Mention is node of beer given for the ticket price, a natter which
the R>lice Departnent has taicovered.
c*6) Security details are not cowered.
c-7) The soind aaplification is not indicated-
c>8) Food concessions are indicated, but not in detail. Mo pe:mit or
license has been Issued for mtf sudt ooncossion.
Conclusions
The proposed activity a^^ars to be in dirrot vlolatim of the zoning ordinances con*
trolling conaercial activity in a residential area and involving general perfonunce
soecifications conoeming noise nd traffic control. In addition, the re^renients
of Chapter 69 haw not been net in either letter or spirit of the lew's intent. The
application is late, incan|aetc and nay include incorroct infbmatlon. The plans
aiipear to be ill conceived and not thorou^y woihed out. This leaves one with the
inpfession that control of the expected rrowd would be difficult or impossible, and
that the City could iw>t adequately protect the health, safety or welfare of its
citizens.
* .-'v •)
. >
f ^
. . V'
9 4^.
••' ■ ■*.
■ ■ r ■
y't .
4-'
■•V
J.
.. r-m I
«¥
.< ■ •!
■ y'r
i ^
• .‘f-
* it.
n ■•■A »
■ i: i
mi
Ik'*