HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-07-12 Memo, Variance ApplicationTos
Proas
Dates
Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members
Planning Commission Chairman Kelley
Orono Planning Commission Members
City Administrator Bernhardson
Jeanne A. Mabusthr Building & Zoning Administrator
July 12, 1990
Subjects #1561 Christine Beck, 3820 Cherry Avenue -
Variances - Public Hearing
Soiling District - LR-IC
Total Area = 30,540 s.f. or .7 acres
Required ■> 21,780 s.f.
Pertinent Ordinances -
Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 - Lakeshore setback for
proposed deck extension within 75* of the lakeshore
protected area.
Existing “ 27' (stairs leading from lakeshore deck
approved variance 11172, 9/14/87)
Existing = 37'4" (existing 5* overhang along lakeside
of house)
Existing Cantilevered Lakeside Addn * 39’8"
Proposed Deck Extension = 37' (deck addn will extend
4" beyond 5' overhang)
Setback Variance = 38' or 50.6%
Existing Variance Approved for Deck/Stairs * 48' or 64%
Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Lakeshore hardcover within 0-
75' .
0-75' Setback Area = 11,250 s.f.
Original Hardcover Approved with Variance
Application #1172 - 1,751.5 s.f. or 15.5%
Adjusted Hardcover Level Based on Overhang Width
at 5' Rather than 4' as Originally Measured ■
1,774 s.f. or 15.7% (increase of 22.5 s.f.)
Proposed Hardcover ■ 1,804.4 s.f. or 16%
(includes deck area not included beneath
existing 5' overhang - 23.5' of addn
deck at 4” and 1' extension of deck as
it extends to the edge of house increase
in hardcover of 30.4 s.f.)
Zoning File #1561
July 12, 1990
Page 2 of 3
List of Bxhlblts
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
Exhibit F
Exhibit G
E>Mbit H
Exhibit I
Exhibit J
Exhibit K
Application
Property Owners List
Plat Map
Deck/Stait Pl^an Approve^' #1172
Planning Conmtission Minutes 8/17/87
Council Minutes 9/14/87
Site Plan
Section/Existing/Cantilevered Lakeside Addition
Plus Overhang
Section/Proposed/Deck with Overhang
Survey
Staff Sketch
Review of Application #1172 -
Applicant received approval for a lakeside deck and stair
structure within the 0-75' setback area resulting in a total
reduction of 55.1 s.f, of hardcover. The majority of the deck
was placed over existing hardcover improvements such as the
foundations of a former attached structure and a patio area and
the removal of a storage structure consisting of 242 s.f. of
hardcover located within 15’ of the lakeshore. Staff can confirm
that all necessary hardcover removals have been completed.
Review of Current Application -
As noted above, hardcover calculations within 0-75' setback
area have been adjusted as it was determined that the total
overhang along the lakeside of the house is at a 5' width rather
than 4'. The applicant now proposes the removal of a 2'8"x22.5'
cantilevered lakeside addition and the extension of the 5'4" deck
along the complete lakeside of the house (5'4"x23'6"). Total
increase of hardcover within the 0-75' setback area with the
installation of the deck will be 30.4 s.f. as deck will extend 4"
beyond existing 5' overhang and will extend 23*j' rather than the
existing 22*j'.
The setback of the deck will be now at 37' where the
existing overhang was 37'4’*. The proposed deck extension will
continue to have the 5' overhang (review Exhibit I).
Options of ActiMi -
Denial. If the application is to be denied, please refer to
the necessary findings in the variance sections of the code? or
Zoning File #1561
July 12, 1990
Page 3 of 3
Approval, Staff has noted the following findings fcr
consideration in your recommendation:
1. The deck extension jlong the front of the house will
provide less of a visual impact and will be less intense in
structure than the existing structure. Expansion will
result in minimal hardcover increases and encroachment into
the lakeshore protected area.
2. The applicant's son has advised that the existing deck
has served his elderly mother, but askes for the extension
to provide a shaded deck area as existing deck remains in
the sun throughout the majority of the day. Mr. Beck has
also provided photographs of the portion of the structure
under consideration for review t;y members at your meeting.
Staff Would suggest the following conditions for
consideration:
1. Removal itf 30.4 s.f. of existing hardcover to offset new
ad^.tionai haroxover from proposed deck expansion.
2. Applicant is placed on notice that no further structural
improvements to the structure located within the 75* setback
area is allowed without Council approval.
Additional Coaaients and Planning CoMtission Reo
August 30, 1990
sndation -
The application involves approval of a 4" extension into the
lakeshore yard for an extension of the lakeside of the existing
deck. The deck expansion will replace the cantilevered addition
of the existing residence. This section will be removed and a
new outer wall replaced and a deck extended along the front of
the house. In consideration of the condition to remove the boat
house of some 240 s.f. within her lakeshore yard with an earlier
land use application in 1987, staff felt it appropriate to not
require the removal of approximately 30 s.f. of existing
hardcover to allow for the increase of hardcover within the 0-
75*. The applicant had suggested removal of an existing paved
area, in light of the age of the applicant who uses this side
walk, staff sti, gly recommended that no existing hardcover be
removed and to approve the additional 30 s.f. of hardcover.
The Planning Commission accepted the staff recommendation.
The enclosed resolution has been drafted for Council's review and
action.