The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1991-08-08 Request for VarianceTot Planning Coirnnlasion Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members Acting City Administrator Gerhardson Fxomt Dmtmt Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning 6 Zoning Administrator August 8, 1991 Subject! #1608 James Hartzell, 2987 Casco Point Road Variances - Public Hearing toning Oletricti LR-IC, Single family lakeshore residential, 1/2 acre, severed Description of Requests Requesting lot coverage and average setback variances (hardcover variance also required) to construct swimming pool and patio. Pertinent Ordinances 1. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 Existing > 23.8% Proposed *= 35.9% Allowed « 25% - Hardcover. (75-250* zone) 2.Section 10.22, Sub<iivision 1 (B) - Average lakeshore setback - Proposing 25' encroachment past average setback line where no encroachment is normally allowed. 3.Section 10.03, Subdivision Existing > 8.3% Proposed ■ 15.7% Allowed n 15% 14 (c) - Lot coverage. ^PPif<^nt*s Stateasnt of Hardship and Onusual Property Conditiena 1. Pool area encroaches average setback line because neighboring homes are sited far from lakeshore. 2.All homes along shore are set far off lakeshore and distanced considerably from where pool would sit. Pool would not have negative visual impact on these neighbors. List of Inhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit P - Exhibit G - Exhibit U - Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K - Application Plat Map . operty Owners List Neighboring Property Owner's Letter of Support Survey Site Plan, Existing Site Plan, Proposed Applicant's Hardcover and Lot Coverage Calculations Staff Review of Hardcover and I-ot Coverage Plan View, Proposed Pool and Patlo/I>andscape Areas Sketch, Average Setback Zcning Pile #1608 August 8, 1991 Page 2 of 3 Discussion The survey indicates that applicants own the adjacent residence to the south (3005 Casco Point Road)/ on a separate riparian lakeshore tax parcel. They also own the non-riparian lot upon which the tennis court sits. These two extraneous lots, because they are separate tax parcels, have not been included in the hardcover calculations. The hardcover review and site inspection by staff determined that applicants submitted hardcover worksheet had omitted significant areas of driveway, sidewalk, and the water surface area of the pool (this application was submitted in January, prior to the pool hardcover policy revision by Council). Existing 75-250* hardcover is 23.8%. Prop-Dsed hardcover without removals is 35.9%. The existing driveway serving applicant's property is fairly large, however, that driveway serves both of applicant's residences, and is mostly located in the 250-500' zone. Other than driveway areas, there is very little nonstructural hardcover which can be removed to compensate for the hardcover excesses. The average setback encroachment of 25' is defined by the neighboring adjacent houses, one of which is owned by applicant. The top of the fence surrounding the pool will be approximately 7' above existing grade at a distance ’Approximately 40' lakeward of the existing deck. The neighboring residence to the north is offset approximately 140' from the proposed pool and is relatively high in elevation compared to the pool. The xppHoant's house at 3005 Casco Point Road, has some lakeviews across the pool area already partially screened by existing trees and vegetation. Lot coverage will bo slightly over the 15% limit when the pool is included in the calculation. Issues to Consider 1. Will any nelghborin«:< properties have their existing views of the lake negatively impacted by construction of this pool/patio/retainlng wall system? is there sufficient hardship shewn to justify approval of the proposed 25' average setback encroachment? (The pool will be 105' from the shoreline at its closest point). 2. Are thete any potential structural removals or reductions which could keep this property within the 15% limit? Is there sufficient hardship to grant a variance for lot coverage? Zoning Pile #1608 August 12, 1991 Page 3 of 3 3. Rei 1. 2. Are there existing hardcover areas on the property which can be reduced or eliminated to compensate for the proposed hardcover excess? Is the fact that a single driveway and parking area serves two properties, with most of the hardcover on the lot with proposed pool, a potential justification for granting a variance? Are there other justifications for granting a hardcover variance, or a partial hardcover variance? let ion Options Recommend approval as proposed. Partial approval, specify limitations, or table for review of revised plan. Send on to Council, 3. Denial. 4. Other. '•1 4 f)e 1 it. Pol J?b 67 1 %; �,�; (2i1�� , IS /` (20 %G2 a I d (27) 1 ��. . 41 r sr (3) ( 22) \ tip' o32) 101N 54) log - p - 1r 53 108 to 4r (55 ftj 105 o � 6S) 1 f •1 (49) J , .� I ( 36) •� 94 01 00 ( 641 61 • s ' SuA E � l 33 e . � _ - • � � � • ►fi' ' • • f •t JU• „• ti, 1 r .� (20) (I) s J .j i ( , - (IT) • tis , ,S �' 3 ca �a n� est .;►�° (6) tyE lot A 02 61 63 M MM MH It/lO/MI iATCN 001 MNNiPXN COUNTY PROOCIITY XNFOOHATXON SYSTEM PROPERTY 0»0CRS LXST REPORT NO. PX435401 PAOE 1 PROP AOOR OMCR NM« TAXPAYER NAHi/AOim SO tO-117-ES SI OOSO 0X990 CASCO POXNT RO 0 A J NORRXS SRAOLEV C OAKKE X990 CASCO POXNT RO NAYZATA m BSS91 SO X0-117-XS SI 004S 02976 CASCO POXNT RO STENART R PERRY STENART R PERRY 2976 CASCO POXNT ROAO NAYZATA HN 66S91 SO 20-117-2S SI OOAl 02900 CASCO POXNT RO C N HAACK A P MULLEN HAACK C N HAACK A P MULLEN HAAO( 2900 CASCO POXNT RO NAYZATA MN S6S91 ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAMS/AOOR SO X0-117-XS SI 00*4 0X9*7 CASCO POXNT RO TOO ROZEOOON THEODORE A DEBORAH ROZEBOOH X9*7 CASCO PT RO NAYZATA MN B6S91 SO X0-I17-2S Sr 0070 OOOSO ADDRESS UNASSXONED JAMES R A CATHERXNi HARTZELL JAMES R A CATHERXNE HARTZELL 127 N00DLAM4 AVE ST PAUL MN 66106 SO 20>117-2S S4 OOOS 0S016 CASCO POXNT RO R 0 LAURXE ETAL R 0 LAURXE S016 CaSCO PT RO NAYZATA MN S6S91 PROP AOOR OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR Si X0-117-XS S4 00X0 OSOXO CASCO POINT RO JOSEPH E BRAUN ET AL CAROL J KELLY SOXO CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA Ml BBS9I SO 20-117-2S S4 002S 02907 CASCO POXNT RO JAMES R A CATHERXNi HARTZELL .:AMES R a CATHERXNi HARTZELL 127 NOOOLANN AVi ST PAUL MN 56105 SO X0-117-XS S4 00X4 0S006 CASCO POXNT RO JAMES R A CATMERXME HARTZELL JAMES P A CATHERXNi HARTZELL 1X7 NOOOLANN AVi ST PAUL MN 55105 PROP Al TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR TOTAL BATCH OCl 00009 X CERTXFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENno ARC AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTAnON OF XNPORHATXON AS XT APPEARS TNXS DATE ON THE RECORD! OP THE HEMCPXN COUNTY OEPARTMENT OP PROPCRTY TAXATXON. TO THE BEST OP MY KNONLEOOE AND BELXEF.. . * . MTf z m I o' .*1. 'N\ A‘ Oft • z* ?n*'•s*» K>5i#o.‘vv lo^» ^'\ ^ \ fO| ry ” \ $ J \ . \ . >'• m ,«■) • ••.! 0 _ to^’ •*••'> w—\« V ^• 1 • \ \ V XV # *.'•A''V k t ■ ^ A J_oo V ,1^) • ait ••I 1'(^4 vy r.»*. I 7 V«' ‘g / •n. T'v I;- *♦A- t • ««» I . > :.r^ V-* ,1 ^ 4i * * t ^ - /I • 1 • ^ /^AfCDCOl/t:tC V 'V •V 15-7 '^0 . ^ ^ ■'i’/^V ■___________iJ•t‘>i.: \.:- U -TstJ \ L<' 7o\V^’ »<*• -s^- «, w« i y 77*®, ( 1.1 ,#• ^•■0' i-» 4-7 t, IO| ry" \ • • > \ .. L M • <'*) -K*r ^ • loa •“ t'V •'• r '1W <1 «. l\'l (on \' ^ r* A vy c. •*!•* *. ks^ 7^ t/fcs .4 IK' IS-ZSD ¥: < - U -7Jf:-i^S\‘^5P^A^i