HomeMy WebLinkAboutSeptic/sewer info . � °�U
, CITY OF ORONO O O
Municioal Offices a
Post Office Box 66 ���
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 � � ON—SZTE SEWAGE TREATMENT
INSPECTZON REPORT
ti
��9k o��G
ESH
� /�:�(� �r.��--� -� IZ�
Owner: � (/�S ��Address: S t �
Permit �' s: �iC Dates: // /� � 'Contractors: `////Jl/�'I'�
City ordinance nunber 100 requires that each on-site seuage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis.
The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category
checked below.
(This is [� an existing system [ ] new construction)
SYSTEM CONFORMITY (1-3):
1 "CODE SYSTEM"-A system uhich meets all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City
Codes, and uhich is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input
uithout discharging any pollutants into ground or surface Waters.
2 "CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A system which does not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the
current City Codes, but was installed according to the code in effect at the time of instaltation, and uhich
is operating satisfactority by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input Without discharging
any pollutants into ground or surface uaters.
3 "NON-CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A prohibited system; a system located within a designated 100-year floodplain; any
system Which may or may not meet all the tocation, design, and construction standards of the current City
Codes and uhich is failing for any reason; and any system uith less than 3 feet of unsa rated soil or sand
betueen the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics. D��.,�r- �,����� ��s�9b
� � �
(The Limitin g soil characteristic �3--has or [ 7 has not been identified at this time. I the limiting soil
characteristic has not been identi fied, this classification may be subject to revision.)
/�✓� TANK CONDITION (5-10): �
/
�y� T�Q�c inspection indicates:
�.�� ( 5J Punpout not needed at this time.
�"6 Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year to help prevent future problems.
si�''�A 7 Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks should be punped out as soon as possible.
System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out uithin 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge.
�< 9� Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers (4" dia. pipe) must be installed in each
�" tank at next punQout. If tanks have not been pumped out uithin the last three years, they shoutd be purt�d
J� OUC �IOM.
10 Inspection pipe is located directl over tank baffle (does not give accurate measurement of solids acc�anulation).
If tanks have not been p�rnpe�out uithin the Last three years, they shoutd be pumped o�t now.
DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14):
Dr field inspection indicates:
11 Drainfie[d is dry, no surfacing evident.
� Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet.
13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City lnspector
imnediately. Repairs must be compteted uithin 90 days.
14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown.
LIMITING SITE FACTORS (slope,setbacks,etc.):
POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE (depends on soils,water table,etc.): ���f�
�
COMMENT�: � �N
O � c» � S ��
S/7 � �-��
�-- — � n�-
Date of Inspection Se ic System Inspector ����
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of
property, be advised that this report does not guarantee or certtfy that an existing system will continue to function
properly� but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available
information.
This report must be kept on the pre�nises uith the system locatien and pumping records.
WHITE COPY/Inspectors File YELLOW COPY!Homeowner
CITY OF ORONO � O�
Municipal Offices O � O
Post Office Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 � � ON—SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT
r�`,� � INSPECTION REPORT
'�� G~
�
9kESH�g'
Owner: �.�I'- Address: �.,,(r��t(.� `�il��'�F-L�!//z� / J� 1V�•
Permit #'s: Dates: /��� Contractors: . �/��[,/�Il"1
City ordinance number 100 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis.
The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category
checked below.
<This is [�1 an existing system [ ] new construction)
SYSTEM CONFORM[TY (1-3):
1 "CODE SYSTEM"-A system which meets all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City
Codes, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input
without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface uaters.
2 "CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A system which does not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the
current City Codes, but was installed according to the code in effect at the time of installation, and which
is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging
any pollutants into ground or surface uaters.
3 "NON-CONfORMING SYSTEM"-A prohibited system; a system located uithin a designated 100-year floodplain; any
system which may or may not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City
Codes and which is failing for any reason; and any system uith less than 3 feet of unsa rated soil or sand
� between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics.��r �> ti�� �� 3��9j�
i`c�rr
(7he limiting soil characteristic �}—has or [ ] has not been identified at this time. I the limiting soil
characteristic has not been identified, this classification may be subject to revision.)
/�� TANK CONDITION (5-10): �
/'
� � inspection indicates:
5 Pumpout not needed at this time.
S ,.o Soltds accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year to help prevent future problems.
�"'` 7 Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks should be pumped out as soon as possible.
System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out uithin 48 hours to eliminate surface dischar�e.
�s 9 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers (4" dia. pipe) must be installed in each
tank at next punpout. If tanks have not been pumped out uithin the last three years, they should be pumped
� out nou.
10 Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle <does not give accurate measurement of solids accumulation).
If tanks have not been pumped out uithin the last three years, they should be pumped out now.
DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14):
Dr field inspection indicates:
11 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident.
Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet.
13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City [nspector
irtmediately. Repairs must be completed within 90 days.
14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown.
LIMITING S1TE FACTORS (slope,setbacks.etc.):
POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE (depends on soils,water table,etc.): �c
COMMENT : � � + y�
p - ,� r s �
s n ' � - ✓�'¢xT%r-
Date of Inspection Se ic System Inspector �� n�U?��.
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of
property, be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function
properlyi but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available
information.
This report must be kept on the premises with the system loc�tien and pumping records.
WHITE COPY/Inspectors File YELLOW COPY/Homeowner
CITY OF ORONO � O�
Municipal Offices O O
Post Office Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 5 5323-0066 � � ON—SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT
�, INSPECTION REPORT
��� Gti
�kEsKo�`'�
Owner: /'lrS. �)')^l�� ( ,I�C�� Address: /��� .��C%��� rn�1✓1� 1��
Permit #'s: Dates: ��/�—O,� Contractors: J�U���l'�-
City ordinance number 100 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis.
The on-stte sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category
checked below.
(7his is l,�l, an existing system [ ] new construction)
SYSTEM CONFORMITY (1-3):
1 "CODE SYS7EM"-A system uhich meets all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City
Codes, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input
without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters.
2 "CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A system uhich does not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the
current City Codes, but was installed according to the code in effect at the time of installation, and which
is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging
any pollutants into ground or surface waters.
3 "NON-CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A prohibited system; a system located within a designated 100-year floodplain; any
system which may or may not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City
C�des and which ts failing for any reason; and any system with less than 3 feet of unsaturated soil or sand
between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics.
(The limiting soil characteristic [ ] has or ,4(1 has not been identified at this time. If the limiting soil
characteristic has not been identified, this classification may be subject to revision.)
TANK CONDITION (5-10): �=�
T�c inspection indicates:
�5J Pumpout not needed at this time.
b Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year to help prevent future problems.
7 Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks should be pumped out as soon as possible.
� System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge.
Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Ins � risers 4" dia. i e must be installed i
tank at next pumpout. If tanks have not been purtipe out wit in t e ast t ree years, ey s ou
10 inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle (does not give accurate measurement of solids accumulation).
If tanks have not been pumped out uithin the last three years, they should be pumped out now.
DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14):
Dr nfield inspection indicates:
�1 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident.
-i2 Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet.
13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector
imnediately. Repairs must be completed uithin 90 days.
14 Drainfield extent and condit9on unknown.
LIMITING SITE FACTORS (slope,setbacks,etc.):
POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE (depends on soils,water table,etc.): ���„
�
�/ �
COMMENTS:�'__i����{��}�- �.e1�c' f`,t�l� S '"lSf�1�S',
�
Date of Inspection eptic System Inspector
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of
property, be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system wtll continue to function
properly� but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available
information.
7his report must be kept on the prEmises uith the system loc�tion and pumping records.
WHITE COPY/Inspectors File YELLOW COPY/Homeowner
On the North Shore o f
Lake Nlinnetonka
ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT
INSPECTION REPORT � POST OFFICE BOX 66
� _ � � 1335 S. Brown Rd.
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
473-7357
OWNER ��►"�� I/�� �t'rz��V ADDRESS ���� �l,F�� Y/�r,� l�l�l
PERMIT NO.'S. �/� DATES �r��UJ CONTRACTORS SL�lJ►�n
City Ordinance No. 210 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis.The on-site sewage
treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall i�to the category checked below.
(This is �-an existing system ❑ new construction)
� � Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design,construction,and location.Appears to be operating
properly,
�2 Does not meet all current City standards for new construction (1978 Code1 but in most respects appears to be designed,
located, and constructed generally in accordance with previous codes. System appears to be functioning properly;no major
upgrading of the system is required at this time.
� 3 Does not meet current City standards in many respects relating to design, construction, or location.Appears to be operating
adequately at this time, but has a relatively high potential for future problems. No major upgrading of system is required at
this time.
� 4 System may or may not meet current City standards for design,construction or location, but is failing to properly treat and
dispose of the current input, and is endangering a water supply, or is a source of potlution to surface or groundwaters,or is
creating a safety hazard, or is otherwise creating a public nuisance.Please contact the City Inspector to discuss system repair/
replacement procedures. If drainfield replacement is necessary, soil testing will usually be required,and a design and site plan
must be submitted for review.Your contractor must obtain a permit before work is started.
SYSTEM CONDITION ( m Checked items may require your action)
Tank inspection indicates: ❑ Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle. (Does not
❑ Pumpout not needed at this time. give accurate measurement of solids accumulation.) If tanks
❑ Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pump- have not been pumped out within the last three years, they
ed out this year to help prevent future problems, should be pumped out now.
❑ Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks Drainfield inspection indicates:
should be pumped out as soon as possible. �Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evident.
❑ System is discharging to surface. Tanks must be pumped ❑ Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet.
within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge. ❑ Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated
�L '�.Inspection risers missing—tanks could not be inspected, effluent to the surface. This condition may require replace-
�� Inspection risers (4" dia. pipe)must be installed in each tank ment or additions to drainfield. Contact the City Inspector
at next pumpout. If tanks have not been pumped out within immediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days.
the last three years,they should be pumped out now. ❑ Drainfield extent and condition unknown.
SITE CHARACTERISTICS:
Limiting Site Factors Potential for System Failure Site Capabilities for
❑ Slope (depends on soil types,water Future Expansion
❑ Soil table,and system condition) �Adequate
❑ High water table {�-Low ❑ Fair
❑ Lot size ❑ Medium ❑ Poor
❑ Lake,wetland,or stream ❑ High . ❑ Inadequate
❑ Drainage ❑ System is causing visible
surfa�discharge.
i /
COMMENTS: � r' —� ��
S O ' � � I �P l��P
►'Y,� - i � l� ar r ��P_
�
-- �� S��' P�''"'� no�.
Date of Inspection eptic System Inspector
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property,be advised that
this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly,but is merely an opinion of the adequacy
of the system under current conditions based on the available information.
This report must be kept on the premises with system location and pumping records.
WHITE COPY/Inspector's File GOLD COPY/Homeowner
' Spring 1994
- SEPTIC SYSTEMS VS. CITY SEWERS - WHAT DOES THE FUTURE HOLD?
The State mandated upgrade of septic systems located less than 3' above the seasonal
water table will again be a topic of discussion among Orono's rural residents this spring and
summer as the construction season gets underway. City staff estimated last fall that as many as
600 of Orono's 1100 existing septic systems don't meet the 3' separation requirement, and will
eventually have to be upgraded or replaced. The process of identifying those "non-conforming"
systems began last summer, and is expected to continue over the next five years.
STUDY UNDERWAY '
In September 1993, the Ciry Council ordered that a study be commenced to consider the
implications of requiring non-conforming systems to be upgraded when any type of building
permit is requested; to consider the implications of requiring such upgrades in areas that might
be served with municipal sewers in the future; and to review the possibility of amendments to
the City code and Comprehensive Plan to implement the results of the study. The study is
nearing completion, and questions which will be addressed include:
• Identification of neighborhoods where future sewers might be needed due to small
lot sizes or other factors.
• Analysis of whether individual lots in those neighborhoods have the space for
system replacement.
• Estimation of the cost of septic system replacement vs. costs of municipal sewers.
• Consideration of the planning impacts caused by extending sewers.
• Review of what financial aid is available to residents to upgrade septic systems.
• Examination of the limited number of alternatives to sewers or septic systems.
• Analysis of whether the deadline dates for required upgrades or system
replacement are feasible or practical.
The intended result of the study is to determine which areas of the City, if any, will be
provided with municipal sewers, and establish an expected time frame for that to occur.
Further, those areas which will not be provided with municipal sewer in the foreseeable future
will be firmly established. Finally, if extending the deadlines for required system replacements
is found to be appropriate, then those deadlines will be revised.
UPGRADE MORATORIUM EXTENDED
Last fall the Council declared a moratorium on the enforcement of City ordinances that
require upgrade of those systems which are non-conforming only because they don't meet the
3' separation requirements. That moratorium has been extended to September, 1994 but may
be repealed sooner if the study reaches its conclusion before September.
In 1993 the Council also adopted an ordinance allowing up to two full construction
seasons for repair of systems found to be non-conforming due to lack of separation. Systems
identified last summer would still have until the end of 1995 to complete the necessary upgrades.
crrY or oaotvo oete
, ADDRESS � Connected to
CODE SEPTIC SYSTEM INVENTORY CARD Municipal Sewer
Address ����� �i�ACk;F'77S � C=iiU' /`L� Property I.D. IJ II7•-`-� 3� (�n/� WELL DATA
.�Standard trench �p.� � � �,N,.T�� I I
O Mound
System type ❑ Other Legal Description r`�'�rM`���Mr, pF �t����, f�.;-, p �
I �
L
Permit No. % ���'� Date of permit /�-��� ` ��� Installer �t/LL�U,/3�1 � �
a,
� �M� No. Bedrooms Garbage ,� �„
�Building type �E .\lI> -7VC � or GPD �- }3;� Laundry�_Dishwasher Disposal q � = I
� o p
a
� SEPTIC TANKS: Material C�c.,r��c• . �i-��cf.•; Capacity 1) �C�C7 t 2) �`O '� ° Q c
�'Cll"'IF'-{`l� It 1 3�/Sv y�/S z: � �, �
Proper outlet and inlet �K Baffles (uLLiLJ/LL{ �fa`/ Liquid depth to RO level y -�" � `
°' O
/ �
�Height of tank bottom above water table _/tit�A/� Distance to nearest building ��--U N �
�
� �
O
! DRAINFIELD: Total length of lines �9C� Number of lines �' Trench width �_
1
N
Y
Total treatment area(sq.ft.) ��n Height of drainfield above water table 2� ± � �
u
Type of filter material Soil type GC'?+�.y ,C/ail/� n
_ �, �.
d
--. � S �1 /�;c. E t -
Distance from nearest bldg. --�� Tile size�perc rate min/in ° � a ,c
d �
o v
Depth of fill over drainfield �"� Depth of rock over tile under tile � a « �
� N
E c �
.1
p a U �
-rt�1 �_ - �' `1�;;. r����i lf � , �
. Dr��,u�l��t�s /'P-��f��y /-2 ��F Gu�� 7�t.�.
#= � " �v�ar�£s s�n�rva-�-i-y
>;'-� — i�v �/�;�, ,l������-� ��' nc� �
_ .. ..._.....__ ._ . _ . . __.... ....._.......--n...rMr�►'AI�'AM�'P�WM�yW���,
LOCATION
INSPECTION RECORD PUMPOUT RECORD SKETCH
D�TE COMPLIANCE DATE GALLONS
(o"c�S-�l �/(J Sc�•1`=r�Cl/UC.: � //-/=7� /5-c�C�
(L�"��i�J ���,.)'.l�C'�"Z''7� � �j�f�Y�G_
!
! � r�•- aLdU,�{�t�F�� ..1 Y'`-!a �IoLC�
I�,GiA�ri�i��fv��i� sc�•rrr�zf' AiS�N4f'C��
�- ,; - ' , � _�
, t, i ���-, Gl�� � i . / V� �7�� -^..
� i
z-� � 'P� .�_
�=�-,� '� ' � '� --�_
����� r � �
n ,�
Include: 1) Well location
2) Distance from house
septic tanks,dist.bo.
and drainfield
C - CONFORMING S -SUBSTANDARD N - NONCONFORMING 3) North arrow and roa�
i
. _ � , �
�
; ,
,
, � , _
, , �r `
, � • " �,
N_ �
�' ,'�or �
. .
� ,�� � � w w
�� �
,� N ,
.�
� �- � Qr
`� i , �� `,�
f �� "'-
`�J
�
Y � �J
T /v �V
��
� w
/
�
T�
_ � �� i
# � I / `,� `�� . � ^�
T �� V
�: \\ ,- I
�^s \
1 i�1�� w �
J. I � �'
r,; �� 1 �! _�.�� I L
i\
•.� � �. �I � \ � � .
�•.! �' ! �! � \ �'R�_,; Z
,w�' �
U ' I ��`� J�a-�� o
\ 'i '.O � � o I .. }
�
t,�� � � , ` v�
�t � ��,��, ��� � � .
�N `
� '�T_� �\� y \\\ i
' � '
/
3 �
V/ i'✓�
� �
�� 38 �"3 i� a
�3 �,�:..�c,E � i
.;6- =9� }�ouse i
i� 1 \ '
/i � �' � I
� � � —
�
` \ o_ � I
\ y � � � / �
\ Q. � � — —
� �
\ � �1 �
�� 21 37� � s s'�
.Z / � � `x /
�.--��� .T� � `/ ,��
,�.,`�' .+/� I i��� ,�' i
�� �;�_ � ���_ __: - -;
.,�;�/ _ �
� ,- __`�_ - ' �,1-_==--y� /
�--- ��// ��7�✓ ��
�� //��,�,�� t�-� �II,1/I���
"x-Ff[i'UL'A: 1'•�L�N•M�ch JX��� ��-� ii��v��,��Tp ,
la� ��a c��s �'o,
��- ►�,
� .__
_____ ___ ____ ,
3 �
• -. �. :o'
�\ 3R, xj � __
19 13� ��a.�� �
"'6' NouSE
/�i� L` \ O- • .
\ /
, ` `� �- `�
\ /
\ � �
\ �_ \ Z ,
� \\ ' � .
�� ? � I � .
\ �
-- , •31� 53
. `Z / ` b�
��/ .�, . ►� ,, -,
. �,4,�� --� ,%
n\ • ��
�" . ��� r� - -- -
, •��1/ ' /,y,
. yo ,
, - -- -' �
7� ��. —— 3� . �
. �
, �
�, — ' cc�.Uc�Cr � 7S`7
— . .__ . ____--------s�rzr�c� a�s�s+-a�e�'3XCo5 ��1/�_�` ..�'-ro L4KE-
�,
�
SEPTIC SYSTEM INVENTORY /
Addr: 1220 Brackett' s Pt . Rd. PID: 11-117-23 32 0014
Building Type : residence # BRs/GPD: 4 # Systems/units : 2/1
Permit No: 996 Date of Permit : 11/18/65 Installer: Sullivan
System Type : standard trench Appliances : lndry
SYSTEM CONDITION
Conformity: 3 Tank Condition: 5-9 DF condition: 11
Failure Pot : medium
SEPTIC TANKS
Material : concrete block Capacity: 800, 800, 150 , 150
Setback to Bldg: 20
DRAINFIELD
Length of Lines : 290 No. Lines : 6 Trench Width: 2
Treatment Area : 580 Type of Filter: rock
Tile Size : 5 Under Tile : Perc Rate mn/in:
Setback DF-Bldg: 30 DF Ht above WT: 0
Soil Type : loamy sand Limitations : water table
WELL DATA
Setbacks - Well-Tanks : Well-DF:
Report in File? : Pump Type :
Depth: Diameter: Method:
INSPECTION RECORD PUMPOUT RECORD
Date Compliance Date Gallons
6/25/81 no surfacing 2 11/1/78 1500
12/28/84 tanks inspected; also DF for softener 2 8/14/90 2000
7/23/87 no surfacing 2 5/4/92 1500
7/23/90 no surfacing-need risers 2 3/1/96 2000
9/17/92 no surfacing-need risers 2 3/8/96 2000
5/2/94 non-conforming-repair by 12/31/96 3 3/15/96 2500
3/21/96 1000
3/27/96 1500
I�� ��a c��� �'�� �
�,--�--- r�,
__ ____ ,
3 �
• - �, .:o'
'k`\ 3R, yj � , �
1 13 ��wtc,c �
9, t
,- ; ,;�- No«sE _
- � � y
, , o_ � .
� � a � '
�
, - �
s � � � .
� Q. � � j'
� �� •
, ,�
' �. � � '
, � -37' S3
. Z /
��../ �, � 6� �.
'\���.'' ` �
T�' '�`�i .� �_ �� � .
-�!
,�/ - - - / ,, ;
y ou
.
'� '� � ` _ .to '
�' --- � '�° �'-'
' cLFM1Cl(r � 7� �
— -- - ------------�`�rzr1�,� a�s�s+,�cF'3X�5 �����-��'� L4xE f
,,.,-.
�
� ��z a� ���-���� �� .
� O�
� :�., 0
��� ��= CITY of ORONO
'� �F��''�� �►
�` 15r MunicipalOffices
"� ���� �� � ��.. �
�.� ,I`�,'-;�`�`�-�('�����G SVeet Address: Mailing Address:
� `9�fEggOg' 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66
Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
October 28, 1997
Dear Project Area Residents;
Installation of the sanitary sewer lines and lift stations is complete for the Bracketts Point/Bay Ridge
sanitary sewer project. The system will be operational and available for residential connections as
of Monday,November 3rd. All connections to the system must be completed by a state licensed
plumber. A City permit for connection must be obtained by the licensed plumber who is going to
complete the work. Payment of the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services SAC (Sewer
Availability Charge) must be made when the sewer connection permit is issued. This charge is for
the metropolitan sewer system downstream capacity that has been reserved for new sanitary sewer
connections.
According to Orono City Code, all connections to the sewer system must be made within 16
months of the off`icial date that the system is operational for residential connections. Based on the
availability date of November 3rd 1997, the deadline for connection to the system is March 3rd
1999. Effectively, this means that all connections will need to be completed before the end of the
1998 construction season.
Restoration of the project area is scheduled for this fall with the final surface course of asphalt
pavement scheduled for completion in 1998. Thank you for your assistance in this matter and
patience and understanding during construction of this project. Please contact myself or Tom
Kellog with Boonestro Engineers, Phone 604-4863, should you have any questions or concerns
about the project.
Sincerely
� ,�C
� ��
Gregory A. Gappa
Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510