My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1980-08-13 Letter, Lot Division
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
C
>
Casco Point Road
>
2697 Casco Point Road - 20-117-23-23-0004
>
Land Use
>
1980-08-13 Letter, Lot Division
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2024 9:31:20 AM
Creation date
11/13/2024 9:27:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
2697
Street Name
Casco Point
Street Type
Road
Address
2697 Casco Point Road
PIN
2011723230004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Telephone 473-7357 <br />GITYwf ORONO <br />Post OfRce Box 66* Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323* Municipal OflicM <br />On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka <br />August 13, 1980 <br />Nr. Richard Lorge <br />2697 Casco Point Road » 1 <br />Wayzata, <br />Minnesota 55391 <br />Dear Mr. Lorge: <br />It has come to the attention of the City that you have or are in <br />the process of selling one or both of your lots 3 and 4, Aud. <br />Sub. 265, which are occupied by the residence at this address. <br />The Building and Zoning Department <br />of these lots to determine whether <br />built on the northerly lot 3. The <br />(21,780 s.f.) and 100 ft. of width <br />lot meets this requirement. There <br />a separate lot to be built upon if <br />ownership since before 1967, and if <br />area and width requirements. <br />has been reviewing the status <br />or not a new house could be <br />zoning district requires 1/2 acre <br />for each building site. Neither <br />is a provision (31.202) allowing <br />it were in single, separate <br />it meets at least 80% of the <br />Each of your lots taken separately do meet 80% or more of the lot <br />area requirement, but are only 60% of the width requirement. In <br />addition, they have been owned in common through 1980. Therefore, <br />your two lots are legally considered to be one and only one building <br />site, as they apparently have always been used. Even if you sold <br />lot 3 separately, the City staff could not issue a building permit <br />for the lot. <br />Sincer^y^ <br />V <br />^Tson <br />Village Planner <br />APO:kh <br />cc: Mr. Charles Da Mart <br />Ms. Mary Robinson, Burnet Realty, Delano
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.