Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
11-25-1991 Council Packet
T7*T^'— M3BII0A FOR COOMCIL NBBTIR6 SET FOR MONDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1991, 7:9* P.M (*)Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon request. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obta'^ed upon request from the Recorder. i f/Oj ROLL CALL 1. CONSENT AGENDA* APPROVAL OF MlNOTES * 2. Regular Meeting of November 12, 1991 2 5 1991 CttYof ItONO LAKE HINNETOHRA CONSERVATION DISTRICT - JoEllen Hurr Representative PUBLIC COIMBIITS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) BORIBG ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT **APPLICAHTS**Inmediately after the Council has reviewed your application please sign the three (3) original resolutions at the Recorder's desk. Applicants need not execute resolutions for subdivisions, vacations and denials. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. #1551 Robert Waade, Wildhurst Estates Plat - Execution of Amended Plat Mylar #1682 Christine Brickley, 3262 North Shore Drive - Variance #1683 Robert F. Suess, 2590 Watertown Road - Subdivision - Resolution #1689 Terry Sadler, 1396 Baldur Park Road - Variance - Resolution #1691 City of Long Lake, 130 Orono Orchard Road North - Pteliminary Subdivision/Comprehensive Plan Amendment ,TOR/000«CIL REPOJ^ BH6XHBI 8. t REPORT Pay Request #1 Lift Station No. 11 Renovation CZTT ADMINISTRATOR'8 REPORT 9. County Road 15 Safety Improvements Options for Marina License Review Spates Avenue Traffic Concerns Stubbs Bay Sanitary Sewer Study Area - Order Plans and Specifications - Resolution Proposed 1992 Pee Schedule Volunteer Commission Appointments Lease-Purchase Resolution * * 10. 11. 12. * * 13. 14. 15. CITY ATTORHBT'S REPORT LICENSES (16*) BILLS (17*) AOJ •i*J i ,1 1 : t iiik ■t'' F s. AGENDA POH COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1991, 7:®f P.M, OPCOHI TT735 NCfriesaES ANfc EVENTS * council Meeting 11/28 11/29 12/83 12/93 12/04 12/85 12/08 12/11 12/25 - Thanksgiving Day - Holiday - Facilities Design Committee 5 p.m. Room 107L Education Link - Park Commission 7 p.m. Council Chambers - Initial 1992 Budget Hearing 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers - Lake Use Committee 7:45 a.m. Council Chambers - Council Meeting (Last Regular Meeting in 1991) - Reconvened 1992 Budget Hearing 7:00 p.m. (If Needed) - Christmas Day - Holiday -» m /i *-'C I ri' I? .t'TJ'! ii rt?.. y, If?:. ,ir-. I w.’? I I.•K-i', MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBE 1991 ROLL r,'. ,y Th« Council mot on the above date with the following members / present: Mayor Barbara Peterson, CouncIImembers J. Diann Goetten, Gabriel Jabbour, Edward Callahan and ‘«ary Butler. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, Finance Director Tom Kuehn, Building & Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, City Attorney Tom Barrett, City Engineer Glenn Cook, Chief of Police Stephen Sullivan and City Recorder Terl Naab. Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. (#1) CONSENT AGENDA Butler added Items 9, 15, 16. 17, 18 and 19. Jabbour asked that 19 not be added to the consent agenda, but later readded the item to the consent agenda. Mayor Peterson asked that Item #28 be removed. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to approve the Consent Agenda, with the Inclusion of Items 9, 15, 16. 17, 18 and 19, and with the exclusion of Item 28. Ayes 5, nays 0. Motions for all Items adopted by consent agenda will be Included in the minutes In their respective numerical order. (*#2) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to approve the minutes of the regular Orono Council meeting held on October 28. 1991 Ayes 5. nays 0. PUBLIC COMMENTSNina Wlldman, developer of Fox Bend on Leaf Street, requested that the Council consider making her private road a public road as residents of Farvlew Lane continually use the road as a short cut to Leaf Street. Mayor Peterson recalled that she had originally requested a private road. Wlldman explained she originally wanted a private road with a cul-de-sac, but the City thought It should be a through road to Leaf Street. Mayor Peterson advised Wlldman that the Council will be looking at the Issue of private roads vs. public roads at the beginning of 1992, and noted that they would not look at Individual streets at this time. Goetten suggested Wlldman send a letter to the Council with her request, and at the appropriate time, reappear before the Council with her request. fI' t.II: Ir.' %■ I r>. r% k I'r fc’*'- % ^ '■ r MINUTES OF THE REQULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETXNO - NOVIMIER iSi 19§i PUBLIC COMMENTS - CONT. *«**«« Christine Brickley, 3262 North Shore Drive, asked about the proposed boat launch on North Shore Drive, and wanted to know If there were any scheduled meetings on the Issue. Jabbour noted that at this point the Council dio not know, but stated that they would bo discussing this issue as Item #20 on the agenda. (#3) #1682 CHRISTINE BRICKLEY. 3262 NORTH SHORE DRIVE VARIANCES Christine Brickley was present for this application. Moorse explained this Is an application for a variance for the construction of a garage. He noted that it was originally started without a permit and the Building Inspector ordered it be stopped because it encroached setback areas, but allowed the property owner to continue the pour of the slab at her own risk. The Planning Commission approved use of part of the slab, and before Council approval, the applicant went ahead and constructed the garage without a permit. He noted that the garage roof line Is oriented In a direction other than what was originally reviewed. Brickley noted that she and her neighbors who attended the Planning Commission meeting all felt after that meeting that they had approval to construct the garage. She felt that the reason that she had to appear before the Council was to see If they could allow the additional 8x32' slab to remain. She also noted that on Friday she attended a wake for a friend and was unable to get back to the City Hall for the permit. All supplies were on the site and their friends were coming to help construct the garage that weekend. She noted that two plans had been submitted, one facing as It had been constructed. She stated that at this point she does not have the money to slab. remove the W.£; . irr: 1; {'**' ■' MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 12, 1991 APPLICATION #1682 - CONT. Mayor Paterson noted that she and two other Council members were at that Planning Commission meeting and felt it had been made quite clear that the applicant needed Council approval prior to starting construction. She noted that the Planning Commission is only an advisory board. Peterson felt there were two issues to deal with: removal of the excess slab and direction of the roof line. Brickley noted that if the slab were removed, a car would have to be parked there anyway. She noted that gutters could be added to the roof to redirect drainage away from the neighbor's lot. Butler noted that there is a State law that says you cannot cause water problems on neighboring properties. She felt that tne applicant should have learned that it is important to ask many questions prior to starting a project. Goetten noted this Is exactly why permits are required. Jabbour pointed out that the Building Department had stopped work on the slab pour and the applicant was advised that she could continue with the pour at her own risk. He stated that because the work was started prior to approval, the applicant would be charged double application and permit foes. He noted that legally the Council cannot accept financial situations as a hardship for approval of variances. Goetten felt » was a hardshi: of her own doi'tg. Barrett agreed that under th»» . . i.a statute finances are not considered a hardship. of the State, Mayor Peterson noted that the garage will be used to store construction equipment. Brickley noted her fiance is in the masonry business and some of the brick equipment is kept in the garage to ensure that it won't get wet. Goetten asked if this was temporary or long term storage and felt situation may require a home occupation license. Brickley noted it is temporary. Butler felt it was Just storage of the tools of the trade and doesn't mean he is carrying on his business at home. She noted that the cement slab is in the wrong place, it is too big. the rafters are going the wrong way and must be changed. Brickley noted that she was Just trying to clean up the area. r>ir ?■ i'' i' r:i .ii', ht' ^ ■ ^1 *’ ■'* 0' (*■:,' I'fc '•■' T'-':•!. ' /■f f’.- I;;I-: •t/ 1: •i •« N'- '-/4 MINUTII OF THI FIQULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 12. 1991 APPLICATIN #1682 > CONT. Butler felt that It was most unfortunate that the applicant did not ask questions prior to pouring concrete. She noted that even If the previous garage was in the exact same location, the new garage must meet all pertinent setbacks. Gaffron noted that a garage over 750' s.f. must meet 15‘ setbacks from the south, west and east lot linos. He noted that a smaller garage could be constructed meeting 10' setbacks. Jabbour felt this project too ambitious for this lot and noted that the applicant doesn't necessarily have the right to a larger garage. He noted that in a few months there may be new rules even more restrictive for lakeshore lots. Mayor Peterson felt that they all agreed the applicant does not need a home occupation license. She noted the next Issues to be resolved. Goetten asked if there was any way the garage could be moved to allow it to remain and still keep it in conformity with codes. Gaffron noted he didn't see how. He noted that conform, it would have to be made smaller and different location. to make it moved to a Jabbour stated that the garage could possibly be reoriented on the lot to conform. He asked if the fire code came into play with this application. Gaffron noted that is li/vely not an issue because the buildings weren't close together, but If it did, firewalls could be required. Brickley noted that the garage was constructed at a size of 21x32'. Gaffron noted that makes the garage less than 750' s.f., and 10' setbacks would only be required, which eliminates the issue of encroachment on the south side but It still remains for the west side. Butler explained to the applicant the reason for Orono's hardcover regulations. She felt the original gahage size was too much for this substandard lot. Brickley noted that If the garage were to be smaller, she would have to reinstall the two sheds which had been removed to storge all her belongings. Butler noted this would not be acceptable as it adds to the hardcover percentages. i'ir." V ‘ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 12, IBBl APPLICATION #1682 - CONT. Callahan stated that the physical dimensions of the garage are not In Itself abhorent to the Council. He noted that the excess concrete slab and the direction the garage Is facing are the problems. He felt if the garage ware turned It would solve the problem. Brickley felt It would be two years before she could afford to turn the garage. She noted If she can leave the garage the way It has been constructed, next summer she would remove the excess slab and not reconstruct the smaller sheds. Goetten felt the application should be tabled to allow applicant time to consult the Building and Zoning Department for direction and the Council would consider their alternatives at the next meeting. Brickley noted she wanted the Issue resolved that evening. Mayor Peterson noted It may be denied. Applicant agreed to table the application. It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Goetten, to table application #1682 for Christine Brickley of 3262 North Shore Drive to allow applicant time to consult City staff for alternatives. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#4) #1683 ROBERT F. SUESS. 2590 WATERTOWN ROAD - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION T.J. Halslet was present for this application. Moorse explained this Is a request for a subdivision. He noted that the Planning Commission voted 3-3 to approve this application. The following issues need to be resolved: 1) should a total grading plan for the entire property be submitted as the property will probably be developed further In the future: 2) Is this a 3 lot plat which would require a roadway to be constructed; 3) If It Is considered a 3 lot plat, should the existing house be required to relocate the driveway acces. to the new roadway. Gaffron stated that the City Engineer noted there Is potential for the road to continue and perhaps to connect to Golden View Drive. Cook Is suggesting the grading plan should address the retention pond In the northeast corner of the property, there should be swales along the front and east side lot lines, and a grading plan should be submitted and there may be leeway on how much of that plan needs to be executed at this time. Halslet stated that they need *:lar1ficatlon on how much of a grading plan needs to be submitted, a partial or entire grading plan. ii. f MINUTES OF THE REQULAR ORONO COUNCIL MIITINa - NOVIHSIR iii i99i APPLICATION #1603 - CONT. Butler asked how a partial grading plan would fit into a grading plan for the whole property. Cook noted that they could watch to make sure the rest of the property Is not coniprowlsed for future development. He noted dealing with the drainage along the east lot line Is very Important at this time, and a portion of the retention pond should be developed also. He felt a plan for the proposed roadway and a grading plan which covers drainage along the east lot line would be adequate at this time. Halslet noted this was acceptable to them. He noted that prior to application submittal, he had polled the Planning Commission for their reaction on a lot line rearrangement and then a subdivision vs. one application for a subdivision to eliminate the need for a private roadway as the first would provide for only a 2 lot plat. He noted the Commission has now changed their position and Is asking for a roadway to be constructed. Callahan and Bulter felt the first scenario may considered as game-playing. have been Jabbour agreed with the partial grading plan and allowing the existing curb cut to remain for the residence, but f< : the roadway should be developed at this time. All Members agreed this is a 3 lot plat. Halslet asked If the Council would consider ? variance to the road standard and allow Just a drive to be ccnstructed at this time to serve the two new lots. Jabbour asked what the hardship Is for granting the variance. Halslet noted they could have done the two subdivision process and met requirements for a 2 lot plat and not been required to build the roadway. Jabbour felt this was more a technical loophole, rather than hardship. It was moved by Goettan, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Resolution #3038 for Application #1683 for Robert F. Suess of 2S90 Watertown Road, approving preliminary subdivision for a three lot plat which would require submittal of a partial grading and road plan, allowing the existing residence to retain curb cut onto Watertown Road, and allowing construction of a driveway rather than a road to serve the two new lots until further development of the property to the north. Ayes 5, nays 0. 6 r‘- 'i-v r:-.' 5b \ ■-• '• .'S'-i' . 'l-i. % ■»-;'^'1 :''j: >''■ * 1 m ir; I? m- &■ if.= W: MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 12. 1991 (#S) #1687 ROBERT 0. BIL6ER. 4005 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3038 Robtrt Bllger was present for this application. Moorse explained this Is an application for variance approval to build a detached garage. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3038 for Appllcitlon #1687 for Robert Bllger of 4005 North Shore Drive, requesting approval of a variance for construction of a detached garage. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#6) #1689 TERRv SADLER, 1396 BALOUR PARK ROAD - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3039 Mrs. Sadler and Rod Lund were pr.sent. Moorse explained this Is a request for a variance to construct a three season porch In place of an existing deck. Planning Commission voted 5-1 to recommend approval. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Jabbour. to adopt Resolution #3039 for Application #1689 for Terry Sadler of 1396 Baldur Park Road* for variances to construct a three season porch In place of a deck. Callahan asked If the Issue of additional hardcover removal was brought up. Gaffron noted the Planning Commission had not addressed this Issue. Jabbour felt it would only be fair to require the removal of the plastic underlying the rock areas on the property. Goetten stated It could be done next spring. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Jabbour, to conceptually adopt Resolution #3039 for Application #1689 for Terry Sadler of 1396 Baldur Park Road, for variances to construct a three season porch In place of a deck, subject to the removal of the plastic underlying the rock areas on the property In the spring of 1992. Staff was directed to revise the resolution to Include this condition* for final Council action on November 25, 1991. Ayes 5, nays 0. ... ■ - . wmmm i-■ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 12• 1B91 (#7) #1691 CITY OF LONG LAKE, 130 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD NORTH - REZONING Mayor Batsy Swartwood was present for this application. Moorsa axplalnad this requast Is relatad to a proposed subdivision of the property. The Planning Comm1t.c1on recommended danivl of the razonlng and staff has suggested the applicant apply for a PRO. Jabbour asked If a PRO would provide for developable lots. Mabusth noted It would. She stated that the rezoning with a convantlal plat would result In a more restrictive development layout. She noted a PRO would deal with the limitations of the property and allow for special setbacks. She stated that Long Lake Is ready to proceed with an amended plan. She noted that one lot may need to be readjusted as It encroaches the wetland. Mabusth felt that the house pad for that lot wouldn’t be Involved In the floodplain as It had been designated at 947.3'. She noted that the watershed district will not allow retention for development below the 947.3 elevation. Mabusth stated that the current drainage plan Indicates surface runoff going Into the lagoon. Surface runoff can be treated by creating a retention area In the higher elevations. Goetten asked If the amended plan will be on the next Planning Commission agenda. Mabusth Indicated that Long Lake's consultants are In the process of preparing amended plans for a PRO. Mayor Peterson asked If additional engineering costs will be Incurred because of the amendment. Mabusth noted the additional costs for the PRO will be nominal, but that the real costs will result from amendments or need for additional information for a comprehensive land use application. The PRD will provide greater flexibility In dealing with development of this severely limited property. Moorse reiterated that the PRO makes It easier to provide !3 developable lots, however the Council will need to grant an area variance. Mayor Swartwood noted the City of Long Lake has no opposition to the PRO development. She noted that In the agreement between the two cities, the Municipal Board Instructed Long Lake to apply for a rezoning of the pr*3perty per Orono's request. She fe’c that Orono should pay for any additional engineering costs incurred. Butler begged to differ, and felt that the applicant doss bear responsibility for additional costs. 8 —- r 1? 1” t: r:- ?r t r:-. i-- lb'.< I'‘Vi. n: ♦,. i • V . > > ' ^-,- I?-?: E-vv ■ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 12, 1991 APPLICATION #1691 - CONT. Mayor Paterson felt that members of the Council aUays understood that the property would be developed as a PRO. Barrett clarified that the term rezoning was used as a working definition for this property. He noted that a PRO Is classified as a separate zoning district In Orono’s code. He felt that any cost that Long Lake would Incur In changing their application, they will reap through benefits under the PRO development. Mayor Swartwood asked If there would be any new encumberances If the application were to be resubmitted. Jabbour added that he had met with Moorse and Miller, Cc.incll member of Long Lake, to discuss the application. Miller noted at that time Long Lake had no problem amending the application to a PRO development. Jabbour talked to residents who objected to the rezoning and explained why the PRO would be a better development plan. Goetten felt the PRO development would be far more advantageous for Long Lake. Mabusth noted that the amended application Is scheduled for a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. at the November 18th Planning Commission meeting. She asked If the Council wished to reviw the application at their next meeting, November 25th, which would not be the typical procedure. Jabbour noted that the minutes of the public hearing would have to be reviewed early In order to allow the application to proceed to the next Council meeting. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to refer Application #1691 for the City of Long Lake back to the Planning Commission to be revised as a PRD development, and additional application costs to be waived, and all other additional costs Incurred In the amendment of the application are the City of Long Lake's responsibility. Ayes 5, nays 0. <#8) #1692 BRUCE W. ENGELSMA, 090 PARTENWOOO ROAD - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3041 Bruce Engelsma was present for this application. Moorse explained this Is a request for variances to construct an addition to the existing residence. He noted the Planning Commission voted 6*0 to recommend approval of the request. It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution #3041 for Application #1692 for Bruce W. Engelsma of 990 Partenwood Road, approving a variance to allow construction of an addition to the existing residence. Ayes 4. nays 1. MINUTIS OF THt FEOULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 12. 1991 APPLICATION #1692 - CONT. Goatten votad nay and noted she cannot approve of any additional hardcover within the 0-75* zone. She felt there were other options available to the applicant. Jabbour felt the applicant had gone oat of his way to reduce hardcover in areas where he could. (*#9) THOMAS A ALICE STUCK AND JOHN M. BOWERS. 4345/4365 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - MORATORIUM VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3043 SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT - RESOLUTION #3042 It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Resolution #3043 granting a variance to the subdivision moratorium, and to adopt Resolution #3042 for Application #1695 for Thomas and Alice Stuck and John Bowers for property located at 4345 and 4365 North Shore ;3rive to approve a lot line rearrangement of the properties. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#10) STEPHEN A JOANNE WARD, 4695 NORTH SHORE DRIVE VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3044 Stephen and Joanne Ward were present. Moorse explained that the Wards are requesting construct additions to an existing residence. variances to Mabusth added that the addition Is to the street side of the existing residence. She noted that originally it was considered as a garage addition which would allow a 10* setback when there Is • sloping topography. She noted that because the addition was more extensive than Just a garage addition, it would need to meet a 35* setback. She noted that a hardcover variance in the 75- 250' setback area would need to be approved to allow the addition. She noted that applicants are seeking an interior access stair to their home from the garage addition. Mabusth explained that thi Planning Commission voted 3-3. She noted the opposing Members felt the garage should be reduced to a two stall car garage «;ch no Interior access which would eliminate the living space above the proposed garage. Butler noted this is a very unique piece of property with a very steep slope to the lake. She felt the proposed plan made sense. All others concurred. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution #3044 for Application #1696 for Stephen and Joanne Ward, 4695 North Shore Drive, approving variance' to construct an addition to the existing residence. Variances approved are as follows: 25* street setback; 0-75* hardcover at 2,976.41 s.f. or 35% or a 10% variance. Ayes 5, nays 0. \ , it- V-'' ■>y-. !v;'' :V? •«: r % W- r K'>a- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 12. 1991 (#11) #701 DRAGONFLY HILL. 1410/1420 SHORELINE DRIVE ~ REQUEST BY LAND OWNER FOR CITY TO FULFILL CONDITION OF RESOLUTION #1482 Moorse explained this Is a request by one of the original applicants that the City abide by a condition of subdivision and vacation approval that would require the City to construct a fence to prevent trespassing on private property. Mabusth noted that the property owner was unable to attend the ■eating and asked that the request be tabled to the November 25th ■eating. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to table the request for #701 Dragonfly Hill until the next meeting at which a representative could be present. Ayes 2. nays 3. Callahan felt that the Council should approve Installation of a fence and the requestor may review the Issue if he Is not happy with Council's decision. He noted the fence would need to be higher than 3 1/2' to do any good. Goetten felt the fence would not take care of the trespassing. Butler noted that It would fulfill the condition in subdivision approval resolution. the Mabusth stated that the resolution does not state that the fence need to be a privacy fence. She noted that the shared lot line measures 31 lineal feet, and asked If the property owner could extend the fence along the County Road. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to direct City staff to fulfill the obligation In the previous resolution of subdivision approval by Installing a 31' long. 6' high, cyclone fence along the boundary line of the properties. Ayes 4. nays 1. Mayor Peterson noted she voted nay as she felt the request should have been tabled as requested by applicant. (12) #1532 FULLERTON PROPERTIES INC. 225 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - REQUEST TO AMEND DECLARATION FOR PRIVATE ROAD COVENANT - A) HOMEOWNER'S NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR FUTURE ROAD EXPANSION B) RELEASE OF OUTLOT A FROM COVENANTS - OUTLOT B T.J. Helslet was present to represent both Mr. Franks and Mr. cox In this matter. Moorse explained that this Is a request to amend covenant related to a subdivision. a private .U'- ^ ■ I-t- m-' ri"r"1: K- i' EI-: X. ■ S. K‘ ^,- MINUTES OF THE REOULAR ORONO COUNCIL NEETINQ - NOVEMBER 12» 1991 APPLICATION #1532 - CONT. Mabusth noted that Mr. Franks had composed the amendments to the covenants regarding Outlot A and Outlot B and did not use the services of his attorney from the Popham, Halk Law Firm, so Mr. Barrett would not have a conflict of Interest In advising the City on this matter. She explained that Outlot A was originally to be combined with Mr. Cox's property as a condition of subdivision approval, however that process was stopped by Cox after It was submitted to the County because It would raise the value of Outlot A after the combination was approved. She noted the City Attorney should also review this request. Halslet verified that the release of Outlot A was a two-step process, all of which Is to be completed In 1995, and prohibited Cox from building on any part of the outlot until released. Callahan noted that Outlot A contains the overlap of the barn on the Cox property. Mabusth recognized the unbulIdabl11ty of the outlot In Its present legal status. She noted that Cox wants to be released from the private covenants dealing with the development. Jabbour felt that the Council should not act on releasing from the covenants until approval has been gained from property owners Involved. Cox all Barrett concurred with Jabbour. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, Application #1532 for Fullerton Properties Inc., amendments to the private covenants for Shadowood releasing a portion of Outlot A. Ayes 5, nays 0. to table requesting Farms and (#13) #1S51 ROBERT WAAOE, 996 WILOHURST TRAIL - APPROVAL OF INDIVIDUAL ENTRANCE MONUMENT - WILOHURST ESTATES Robert Waade was present. Moors# explained this is a request for Individual entrance monuments within the Wlldhurst Estates plat. He noted the following are Issues: 1) height of proposed monument at 7 1/2'; 2) setbacks; 3) signage on the monuments. Waade submitted to Council pictures of other monuments similar to those proposed. Butler asked If the monuments Incorporated anything else such a mailbox. Waade noted they would not and perhaps only the address could be Incorporated within the monument. ir t\ .■I If »• MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 12, 1991 APPLICATION #1551 - CONT. Callahan fait this should go to the Planning commission first for review. Mabusth explained that monument approval typically goes directly to Council for review as part of final subdivision approval. She noted that perhaps the Planning Commission should determine If the applicant has the right to Individual monuments for each lot. The plan shows a 3’ setback from the roadway, and the monuments must be kept out of the drainage and utility easements. Waade noted that the monuments are proposed at a 10' setback from the roadway. He noted there are others within Orono that have Individual monuments for residences. Butler had no problem with Individual monuments If they would not be 7' tall. Mayor Peterson felt that the Planning Commission should review the request. Jabbour stated that he would like the Planning commission to develop a policy for monuments. Goetten stated that she has asked for this In the past and It has never been completed. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to refer to the Planning Commission Application #1551 for Robert Waade, 998 Wlldhurst Trail, to allow the Commission to review the proposed Individual monuments. Ayes 5, nays 0. <#I4) 3350 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - ISSUE OF ZONING VIOLATIONS - COUNCIL DIRECTION Jim Dunn was present for this application. Jabbour stated that Mr. Dunn felt that Jabbour had a conflict of Interest with this natter. Jabbour has asked the City Attorney to review the situation and both he and Mr. Barrett felt that there was no conflict of interest. He noted that Mr. Dunn has offered to sell his marina to Jabbour, which Jabbour refused to purchase. Moorse explained this Issue relates to commercial property also being used residentially. use of B-2 1.' r 1?- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - NOVBHIIR 12. IflSi 3350 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - ZONING VIOLATIONS - CONT. Gaffron noted that in order to convert the B-2 zoned property from residential use to commercial, a variance for lot area and width standards would have to be approved, and a certificate of occupancy for the use would have to be approved through a commercial site plan process. He noted that In 1985 Dunn applied for a commercial site plan review, which was never completed. The property was then sold to Mr. Toberman and later reverted back to Dunn. He noted that the previous application Is no longer open as It has lapsed over 5 years and the property was sold In the Interim. Jabbour asked about dual use of the property. Qaffron noted the code does not commercial/residential use of the property. allow a mixed Callahan felt that since the commercial use has not been approved by Council* the commercial use should cease. Dunn explained that this property and the one next door have never In the past 11 years totally ceased a semi-commercial use. Ha noted that recently the activity has picked up. He noted that ha does live In the house and commutes back and forth to Florida. Ha stated that ha has tried to get direction from the Council as to what they would like to see on the property. During the 1985 application, Dunn noted that his attorney suggested that he drop the application as It may be suggested to zone the property to residential. Callahan felt that until the process for commercial use has been reviewed, that use should cease on the property. All Members agreed. Jabbour noted that the Issue of a commercial site plan must be resolved. He asked If approved, would the marina need to be licensed Individually. Goetten noted that the Lake Use Committee would be reviewing comprehensive plan for all marinas In the future. a Callahan felt that the license Issue need not be reviewed that evening. Jabbour felt that applicant should totally cease commercial use of the property, and decide which use he wishes to proceed with for the future. Dunn reminded the Council that In 11 years they have not position on these parcels. He wanted to know what their term goal was for the property. taken long- Jabbour reiterated that B-2 zoned property cannot several manners all at the same time. be used .I,..;.. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 12, 1991 3350 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - ZONING VIOLATIONS - CONT. Callahan explained that the Lake Use Committee is currently working on the DNR's shoreland regulations, which will probably take until February or March of 1992. After that time, the Committee would go on to review marinas. He felt that there currently are ordinances covering B-2 zoning that Mr. Dunn should look to for direction. Dunn felt that his house Is also being used as commercial. Jabbour noted that If Dunn Is living In the house. It Is considered a residential use. He stated that Ounn also had the option of a home occupation license, which would not allow the Intensity of the current commercial use. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to direct City staff to take the necessary steps to stop all commercial use of the property until such time as commercial use is approved through the commercial site plan review process. Ayes 5, nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT A) Mayor Peterson wished Goetten Happy Birthday. B) Mayor Peterson noted that she attended the AMM Board of Director's meeting on legislative policy. She noted all items were passed except the LMC Item. She noted it was amended that the Board would only support, not endorse, at the request of the Mayor of Brooklyn Park, toll roads. C) Goetten noted that she and Jabbour had met with two Council members from Long Lake to discuss the development of the Orono Orchard property. She proposed that In the future, representatives from both cities meet on a regular basis to discuss Issues pertinent to both cities. Jabbour noted that these meetings have been happening for some time, but the difference they would like to see Is that they be proactive, not reactive to Issues. Jabbour thanked the Long Lake Council members In their part to resolve the annexation Issue. 0) Mayor Peterson noted that several Stubbs Bay residents expressed e desire to hold the public meeting on the proposed sewer elsewhere. She suggested the school. Barrett noted that If It Is a public meeting. It needs to be published two weeks In a row. Callahan noted that It Is only an Informational meeting. Gaffron clarified that the League handbook states that both a public hearing and an assessment hearing must be held and published In advance. r' v'i r ■■\r it-. U- % li 1* I k- i_ '•• s> I.s ,r i. •'-V I"v- K : MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 12. 1991 MAYOR/COUNCIc REPORT - CONT Barrett felt that the meeting should be held at the place it has been published. (*#15) PAY REQUEST #1 FACILITIES FRONTAGE ROAD It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to approve pay request #1 to B & D Underground, Inc., for the facilities frontage road. In the amount of $52,484.46. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*#16) PAY REQUEST #1 MCCULLY ROAD It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to approve pay request #1 to Bituminous Consulting & Constracting for McCulley Road, In the amount of $23,736.52. Ayes 5. nays 0. (*#17) FALL CLEAN UP DAY TALLY It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to accept Information submitted regarding the fall clean up day. Aye nays Q. the 5, (*#16> STUBBS BAY SEWER AREA INFORMATION PACKET - INCLUDING ILSE LETTER It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, Information submitted regarding the Stubbs Bay Ayes 5, rays 0. to accept the Sewer Project. (*#19) MARINA LICENSES INFORMATION UPDATE It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, Information submitted regarding marina licenses. to accept the Ayes 5, nays 0. (#20) PROPOSED DNR PUBLIC ACCESS Moorse explained that the DNR Is looking at a public access on Maxwell Bay. He noted that staff had a meeting with representatives of the DNR at which they outlined their proposal. He stated that they are planning a meeting for public Input around mid-January. Mabusth noted the property Is zoned LR-lC-l, lakeshore residential, however the DNR does not care what It Is zoned. Jabbour asked restrictions. If the DNR could over ride the City zoning Barrett explained that when a State agency moves to follow through on a State mandate, they are not bound by local zoning restrictions. He noted that zoning would not be a strong argument against the proposal, and the City should concentrate on other areas such as environmental Impact and the Issue of a taking of property. VT7'% it MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 12. 1991 PROPOSED DRN PUBLIC ACCESS - CONT. Butler felt it was important to stress to the DNR the Council's opposition to the proposal. Jabbour stated that he is adamant against any public access over and above what is already designated as such. He noted that perhaps there could be a trade-off with land needed for the HlQhway 12 corridor. He felt that if the ONR wants access In OronOf Council should find an area that it would be least distasteful. Goetten noted that there are already several accesses in Orono. Butler pointed out that the property is next to a marina with lake access. She felt that perhaps someone should encourage the ONR to acquire all the property along the strip to layout the proposal in an environmentally sound way and in the least disruptive way possible. Jeff Johnson, Planning Commission member, asked if the DNR's proposal fits their own criteria. Dunn, Lakeside Marina, noted that he has addressed the issue with the ONR, and they told him that they are trying to provide 700 parking spaces for public access to Lake Minnetonka. He noted they suggested looking to do Joint ventures with cities. Dunn noted they told him that they had unlimited funds fo-.- acquiring access to Lake Minnetonka. He felt that a public access near his property would only cause him problems. Goetten asked how many parking spaces are to be provided. Moorse stated that up to 25 spaces would be provided. Mabusth noted that parking would likely be right up to the lot lines. Callahan felt that they need a written opinion from the City attorney noting the City's various powers in this matter. He also directed Barrett to look at the DNH shoreland regulations and what power the DNR actually has to require the City to comply with their regulations. Jabbour also asked Barrett to supply to the Council a copy of the Mandate of legislation that created the LMCO. (#21) RESCHEDULING TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING Moorse noted that the meeting was originally scheduled for November 19th, but that date was in conflict with the County's meeting on taxation. Moorse suggested December 4th at 7:00 p.m., with the reconvening to be held on December llth at 7:00 p.m. If needed. ■p.L:v^ All Members agreed to those dates. F1* 6^.. r.>'' i-v. [I ;A NSNUTIS OF THE REQULAH COUNCIL MEETINO - NOVEMBER 12, 1091 (*#22) CONSTRUCTION MANAGER CONTRACT It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to approve the contract for the construction manager as submitted. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*#23) MOONEY LAKE RULES INFORMATION PACKET - ORDINANCE #98, SECOND SERIES It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Ordinance #98, Second Series, amending Section 9.32 of the Municipal Code regarding Mooney Lake rules and regulations. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*#24) RESCHEDULING OF BONO SALE FOR NEW CITY FACILITIES It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to reschedule the bid opening for the bonds to Monday, November 25, 1991 and that an HRA meeting to award the sale of the bonds be scheduled for 6:30 p.m. on Monday, November 25, 1991. Ayes 5, nays 0. ( -#2S) RESOLUTION #3045 ~ WAIVING BIO IRREGULARITIES It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to waive the Irregularities In the bid process, and to award the bid for concrete and masonry work on the new City facilities to Gresser. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*#20) PART TIME POLICE OFFICERS It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to accept the Information submitted regarding part time police officers. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*#27) BEDERWOOO SKATING RINK It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to approve the Installation of the water line from the well to the skating rink location at Bederwood Park and to fund the Installation of the water line from the Park Dedication Fund. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#28) LICENSES Goetten expressed her opposition to the trapping of any animals. It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Jabbour, to approve following licenses: the Septic System Installer License - Coppln Plumbing 2300 Chateau Lane. Mound Limited Trapping Permit - Michael Bosanko. 2090 Shoreline Dr Ayes 4, nays 1. Goetten voted nay. Jabbour asked Chief Sullivan If hunting was allowed on Big Island and notified him that he recently witnessed hunters headed towards the Island. He directed the Chief to check Into this Issue. -- - - - -- f r-’ -r I^1?:,F I I r- ■1^' ’•i ^■■-■ ■'> ■ \.« ; vfc MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 12f 1991 LICENSES - CONT. Goattttn axpressod concern for children in the area because of hunters. Sullivan noted that Is why hunting in Orono is limited to bow hunting. («#29) BILLS It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, of the All Funds Account. Ayes 5, nays 0. to approve f^ayinent ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Jabbour, the regular meeting of the Council at 10:20 p.m. to adjourn Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallln, City Clerk fI liliT^-W- Vii NII a I - _» ■'..A. tV:' >. : ■ TDS Date: SubjectI Mayor Peterson and Orono Council Members City Administrator Moorse Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoring November 21# 1991 Administr^tc^^P' ^ ^ #1551 Robert Waade - Wildhurst Estates Plat - Execution of Amended Mylars l99t •'0 The City has been asked to execute amended mylars for the Wildhurst Eatates. In the process of reviewing the title information and the legal descriptions set forth in the original mylar, Nancy Husnik of Popham Baik noted several discrepancies. It was necessary for the developer, Mr. Waade, to have new mylars drafted to reflect actual fee ownership. One of the discrepancies involved land within Forest Lake that was platted in the early 1900's and a 15' corridor along the northeast corner of the property. The exclusion of these properties has no impact on the four lots as proposed for approval by the City. The Mayor and Clerk are asked to re-execute the mylars so that they can be filed within the next week. t.r' if rb 7 ■ N f' p 'k- t. $/ Tot Mayor Paterson Orono Council Members City Administrator Moorse Froms Date: Subjects Michael P. Gaffron# Asst. Planning & November 21 r 1991 Zoning A^i^^^^|^^or OfiQ. #1682 Christine Brlckley, 3262 North Shore Drive - VarrfPAto List of Bxhlblts Bschibit A - Notice of Council Action 11/12/91 Discussion The attached Notice of Council Action was mailed to the applicant on Thursday* November I4th. As of this writing* the applicant has n.^t contacted the City to discuss the application. Site inspection today by the Building Inspector found that while construction has not continued* applicants are using the unfinished garage for vehicle and property storage. Absent any contact from the applicant* the staff would request Council direction as to a date certain by which applicant must present a revised proposal or have the offeading structure/hardcover removed. Staff BecesBendation Staff recommends that if no revised proposal is forthcoming by January 1, 1992* the Council will take action to formally deny the after-the-’fact variance request and direct staff to pursue legal action to remove the offending structure/hardcover. ft- II . Lr’v -J- w APPLICATION NO. 1682cm OP OROHO P.O. Box €6 Crystal hay, MN 55323 473-7357 NOTICE OP CODNCIL ACTION Date of Notice: 11/14/91 i 90s Christine Brickley 3262 North Shore Drive Naysata, MN 55391 [ RPB OP APPLICATIONX Varianc !' -- - - - - - - - - -- -- - - -- - --- - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - DAT! OP MBBTXNGx 11/12/91 VOTBt 5 For 0 Against ^ • I dL ACTION - MOTIONS Table# directing applicant to work with building and zoning staff to develop a plan that more closely meets the code requirements. Please contact City staff at 473-7357 to make an appointment to meet with them. __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ ^_ minutes# they are avaflablV from the city Clerk after review and approval by the City Council • l£ you desire certified copies of the official Council 13 'ic eh T..- V. ^■'LV >'|.C .V"Vk. ’ I .A- 4 .• r Iff, fc '•' W.' ii.Fii- ti'^V :v®-Ei¥ #• > .#1 i * 'X- m.... * f.- ?•- i: & ft wfe:f 'k' v> y: r1}’. ., tt^i^yaiiiiiiiiiii Tbs COUNCIL MEETOie NOV 25 1991' Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & ZoningOmfi0P^H0||Q Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron MoorsOf City Administrator Date I NOV(ler 19, 1991 Subjects #1683 Robert F, Suess, 2590 Watertown Road ** Preliminary Subdivision Approval - Resolution List of Sxhlbits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Resolution Notice of Council Action 11/13/91 Grading Plan Memo & Exhibits of 11/05/91 Dlecneeion At your November 12 meeting. Council voted 5 to 0 to grant conceptual prelisiinary subdivision approval for this 3 lot plat, granting a variance to allow construction of a private driveway rather than a private road in Outlot A to serve the two new building lots. Council further allowed the existing house driveway to be maintained at its current location rather than relocated to Outlot A, until future subdivision occurs. The implicant was required to submit a partial grading plan for stafz/engineer review. A copy of that plan has been submitted and forwarded to the City Engineer for comment Staff Reoammendatloo Staff recommends granting of preliminary plat approval per the attached resolution. Isv r- A ABSOLUTION GRANTING PABLININART APPROVAL FOR A PLAT AT 2590 MATBRTONN ROAD PILB NO. 1683 WBBRBASf Robert F. Suess (hereinafter "the developer") on August 23» 1991 filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a 3 lot residential plat of property legally described as: The west quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 33f Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th principal meridian. AND That part of said Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter which lies East of the West quarter of said Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter, and which lies West of the East 20 acres of Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter. (hereinafter property”)! and said "the miBRBAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Hinnesota Statues 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 16, 1991, continued to October 21, 1991, at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and at their regular meeting held on November 12, 1991, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of Robert F. Suess, noting the following findings of fact: 1.The property is located within the r.R-lB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. 2. The property contains a total of approximately 19.7 acres excluding Watertown Road, none of which currently is listed as designated wetland. 3.The proposed plat contains 3 lots each meeting or exceeding the 2.0 acre mlnimur lot area requirement. 4.Proposed Lot 2 requires a variance because it does not have the required frontage on a public roadway. Page 1 of 6 u t t'ivV ■ [■f If’ i. s: f- \:I ff- i;- S* Lot:s 1 and 2 are proposed to front on and access to a private driveway to be constructed within a 50' outlet intended for future development of a private road. 6* The existing residence within Lot 3 is proposed to maintain its driveway access directly to Watertown Road. 7. Because this is technically a 3 lot subdivision^ a variance is required in order to allow Lots 1 and 2 to access via a private driveway in Outlet A, rather than requiring the construction of a paved private road and cul-de-sac. Granting of this variance is appropriate because: a. The location of the garage serving the existing residence# and the layout of existing buildings on the property, would result In the need to construct a driveway 300' in length and destroy certain trees and amenities of the existing residence site. b. The existing driveway location serving the existing residence accesses Watertown Road at a location that is not hazardous based on vertical or horizontal sight lines. c« Because the property exists in two separate tax parcels, the applicant could have taken advantage of a two-step process of lot line rearrangment and platting which would have resulted merely In the creation of two building lots In nearly the Identical layout as the current proposal, without the requirement for construction of a private road. Orono codes allow a shared driveway access for up to two residences• d. Outlet A, while proposed to be developed at this time for merely a driveway serving two new building sites. Is located so as to be available for future extension to serve the future development of Lot 3. 8. It is Intended that Outlet A and the driveway constructed within It shall remain In the ownership of the owner of Lot 3. An access easement will be required over Outlet A In favor of Lots 1 and 2. The developer will be required to execute covenants to define responsibility for construction and maintenance of the driveway and Outlet A, and to define future financial obligation at such time that the driveway Is upgraded to private or public road status. Page 2 of 6 .5 ■ k-*.: ■v, . ILL- 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. It is the City's intent that any future development of the property that creates additional residential lots using Outlet A for access will trigger upgrade of Outlet A to current road standards. The developer will be required to grant to the City an underlying road and utility easement over Outlot A. It is intended that there be no direct curb cuts or access for Lots 1 and 2 directly onto Watertown Road except via Outlot A. Furtherf it is intended that no building permits for Lots 1 and 2 be issued until the driveway serving both lots is completed. The applicant has provided a grading and drainage plan for the which will accomodate the current development of two building sites and which can be upgraded and revised as future development of Lot 3 occurs. The City Engineer has preliminarily approved this plan with minor revisions. Right-of-way for Watertown Road of 33' shall be dedicated on the plat. ^he recommendation of the City Engineer# a drainage easement shall be granted over the existing pond on Lot 3. Lots 1 and 2 have been demonstrated to contain suitable sites for primary and alternate drainflelds to serve the proposed single family residences. Single family residences can be constructed on Lots 1 and 2 without the need for further variances. 'i - r- V -A- »• 90Wp TBXRBFORB BB IT RB80LVBD# that based upon one or more of the findings noted above# the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat for Robert P. Suess at 2590 Watertown Road per the survey attached as Exhibit A hereto by Coffin and Gronberg# Inc.# and * variance for Lot 2 which does not front on a public roadway as >f®gnlred# and grants a variance to allow development of a private driveway *f*^**®*f than a private road in Outlot A to serve Lots 1 and 2# subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. Outlot A shall remain in common oinmershlp with Lot 3 in order to facilitate future development of Lot 3. An access easement shall be granted over Outlot A in favor of Lots 1 and 2. Page 3 of 6 r It f. i. . '''■ lu m 3* 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. The applicant shall execute covenants to define responsibility for construction and maintenance of the driveway in Outlot A» and to define future financial obligation of the owners of Lots 1, 2 and 3 at such time that the driveway is upgraded to a private or public road status. Any future development of the property that creates additional residential lots using Outlot A for access will trigger the upgrade of Outlot A to the road standards in effect at that future time. The applicant shall grant to the City an underlying road and utility easement over Outlot A. Standard perimeter drainage and utility easements shall be granted over the entire plat. Drainage improvements to the property shall be constructed per the drainage and grading plan as approved by the City Engineer, subject to a Developer's Agreement to be executed between the City and the developer. Private driveway and drainage improvement construction can begin as soon as the engineering plans for such Improvements have been approved by the City and the Developer's Agreement has been executed. Applicant shall pay the standard park fees for Lots 1 and 2 per the current Park Pee Ordinance. A drainage easement shall be dedicated on the plat over the existing pond in Lot 3 and over the retention pond area in the northeast corner of Lot 3. Protection of drainfield sites via fencing shall be in place during construction of driveway and drainage improvements, and shall remain in place until the residences on Lots 1 and 2 are coov>leted. Dedication on the plat of 33' of right-of-way for Watertown Road shall be granted. Outlot A shall be given a new road name and address assignments for Lots 1 and 2 and shall be consistent with the north/south grid system. Page 4 of 6 .1' r ^ r .'f U •". r ■ a h k- 13.No building permits will be issued until the construction of driveway and drainage improvements is complete. 14.No curb cut/access for Lots 1 and 2 will be allowed onto Watertown Road except via Outlot A. FINAL PLAT SUBMITTALS The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month: 1.RECORD PLAT drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1*«200'. Drawing to Include: a.Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Coffin and 6ronberg« Inc. attached as Exhibit A hereto. b.Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10* wide along all perimeter property lines and S' each side of internal property lines. c.Designation and dedication of the existing pond and retention pond to be developed, as "drainage easements" on the plat. 2. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required: a.Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgace holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. b.The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. c.Signed and executed Drainage Easement for the existing pond in Lot 3| blank area requiring description may be filled out as follows "over the drainage easement as sho%m on the plat of (plat name)". d.Signed and executed Developer's Agreement and Letter of Credit for construction of the private driveway and drainage improvements. Page 5 of 6 i.mta. M 1 A a . - e. Signed and executed Road and Utilities Easement over Outlet A. f .Signed and executed covenants defining responsibility for construction and maintenance of the driveway in Outlet A, defining future financial obligations of affected property -1 ^- - - - - -^ —owners at such time that the driveway is upgraded to private or public road status. Ccxnpleted "Application for Private Road Neune". 3.FEES TO BE PAID: a. b. o • Final plat fee ■ $150.00. Legal review and filing fees of $150.00. Park Dedication Fee at the rate of 8% of the City Assessor's recommended fair market value of the land prior to development. Such fee shall be determined and paid prior to final plat approval, ’rou will receive written notification as soon as the fee is determined. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono^ Minnesota at a regular meeting held Hovember 25» 1991. ATTESTS Dorothy N. Rallln# City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) as. INTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me on this 25th day of November, 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson t Dorothy M. Ballin, Mayor a City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 6 of 6 y ;,r i; P. >' S'. ^ I APPLICATIOH NO. 1683 “o* HOnCB OF COBBCIL ACMOH ^^7357**’^' °“*=* Notice: 11/13/91_ _ _ _ wr'RlbirtT’suiM COMBS* *-J- B«i- -2590 Watartown Road ?285 Danle. street Long Lake. MH 55356 ___Itltt__________ Ttn Ot »»LIC»*10«i Subdivision _________________________________ iliii‘«’«^r’n/i2/9l totb, 5 For 0 Against_______ OOONCIL ACTION - NOTIONt Conceptual approval of preliminary subdivision with the following requirements: 1. Applicant to submit partial grading plan for staff/engineer review prior to Council preliminary plat approval. 2, Construction of a private driveway rather than a private road in Outlot A to serve 2 new building lots. 3e Existing house driveway does not have to be relocated to Outlot A until future subdivision occurs. If grading plan is submitted by 4:30 p.m. on Monday, November 18, pr.llBliiry pl.t Spprov.l resolution will be subnltted for at Monday, November 25, 1991 meeting (meeting starts at 7:00 p.m., Orono Council Chas±>ers ). It YOU desire certified copies of the official Council nlnutes, they ere evelleble from the City Clerk after review and approval by the City Councile Isv ■■ .a:--------- F.. r-'-. r f- ? Tos Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse# City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Dates November 5$ 1991 Subjects #1683 Robert F. Suess, 2590 Watertown Road - Preliminary Subdivision toning Districts RR-IB, Single F2unily Rural Residential, 2 acre, Uissewered Applications Request for subdivision of 19.7 acre existing homestead to create two 2-acre building sites List of Bshibits . Exhibit A - Notice of Planning Commission Action 10/23/91 Exhibit B - Planning Commission Minutes 10/21/91 Exhibit C -> Memo & Exhibits of 10/18/91 Exhibit D “ Memo & Exhibits of 9/9/91 Discussion The applicant proposes to create two new 2-acre building sites from his homestead property on Watertown Road. The proposal includes creation of a 50* outlot for future construction of a private road. Each lot has b^en tested and proved suitable for sewage treatment drainfield sites. The applicant contends that this should be considered a 2- lot plat not subject to the requirement for construction of a private road. He is proposing to serve the two new lots with a single driveway constructed within the Outlot, leaving his existing residence access directly onto Watertown Road. Applicant has provided a conceptual plan for a future cul-de-sac to serve as many as 9 lots, and staff has sketched a conceptual plan showing connection to toldenvlew Drive. The City Engineer requested a topographic survey of the entire property, and upon receipt and review of that survey recommended that applicant submit a grading and drainage plan incorporating swales along lot lines, leading to a detention pond in the northeast comer of the property. The Planning Commission did not cosie to unanimous agreement regarding whether they needed to see the final grading plan before making a recommendation to Council . Zoning File 11683 November 5, 1991 Page 2 Planning Coaniaaion Recovendation At their October 21 meeting. Planning Commission voted 3 to 3 to table the request until the grading plan is r ubmitted. There appears to be unarJmous intent to require a full grading plan but disagreement c ' should review it. Pour of six Planni.^ ’ nmissioners at the October 21 meeting generally favored constxaction of a paved road and cul-de-sac rather than merely a driveway. After much discussion (see 10/21/91 minutes) Planning Commission voted 3 to 3 on a motion to deny based on: !• Proposed plan does not include •*'^ved road. 2. Paved road should be require onsistent with City codes for 3-lot plat. 3. Lack of grading plan. Based on this split recommendation, Plannin< Commission sent this application on for Council review. lasiies to Resolve The following appear to be outstanding issues that Council must address in order to grant conceptual preliminary plat approvalt 1,Should a grading plan for the entire property be submitted by the applicant? it would be staff's intent to review this grad'^ng plan prior to recommending preliminary plat approval. Is this a 3-lot plat? If so, does Council wish to grant a variance to allow construction of merely a driveway to serve the two proposed lots, or require a paved road and cul-de-sac? 3.Should the existing house be forced to relocate its driveway to Outlot A? Alternate Scenario - TSo-Stage Subdivision Process Applicant's agent T.J. Haislet has suggested that this application could have been presented in a somewhat < strived two-stage process in order to avoid the need for a paved road and cul-de-sac. Briefly, the two stages would have been: 1. Metes and bounds lot line rearrangement/comblnarion resulting in a 15-acre parcel and a 5-acre parcel. Subdivision of 5-acre parcel into two 2-acre lots plus future road outlot. 2. f-H-'ri-' i^.T'J;4::-v ■ ■V i-i. ■ U-. Zoning File #1683 November 5, 1991 Page 3 There is no requirement in the subdivision code that requires consideration of commonly owned adjacent property as part of a subdivision when lot requirements are met. Under the two~stage scenario^ applicant would not be asking for any variancer *nd would appear to have the right to request a 2 lot plat, providing an outlot for future developement of the adjacent property. With this background information. Council may wish to consider granting a variance to allow construction of a driveway rather than a paved road. The other option is to deny the variance, which would force the applicant to go through the two- stage process in order to complete his subdivision as proposed. Staff Wa pn—snilstion Council is asked to address each of the issues noted above, and take conceptual action to either approve, conditionally approve or deny this application, directing staff to draft the appropriate resolutions for your November 25 meeting. Isv y.r----- I- - S 4‘ 1^-; • ^ !tv f- i'"'rh- r |Ki-f. ' y. ri. jfi- Jr CULNCIL meetii To:Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Noorse/ City Administrator NOV Z 5 1991 CITY OF ORONO 6 Michael P. Gaffron^ Asst. Planning i Zoning Administrator Datas Noven*'ar 18r 1991 Subjects #1689 Terry Sadler, 1396 Baldur Park Road - Variance Resolution - CONSENT AGENDA The resolutions have been revised to incorporate the requirement for removal of excess rock and plastic hardcover, resulting in a hardcover decrease of 3.3%, yielding a final hardcover of 36.3% in the 75-250* sone. I^roposed Notions Moved by to approve Resolution f , Seconded by approving hardcover and side setback variances for Terry Sadler at 1396 Baldur Park Road. Ayes _ _ _ Nayes. H' i r; tv *'• If'- Wlc A RBSOLOTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO NimiCIPAL SORING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION S (B) PILE #1609 WHEREAS, Terry Sadler (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the property located at 1396 Baldur Park Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 16, Baldur Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property”)t and WHEREAS, the applicant haf applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to allow hardcover in excess of the 25% hardcover normally allowed in the 75*250' lakeshore setback zone and variance to Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to allow a proposed three-season porch to be located 9.9* from the side lot line where a 10' side yard setback is normally required. Minnesotai NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. 2. Tl is application was reviewed as Zoning File #1689 ' le property is located in the LR-lC Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on October 21, 1991, and on a vote of 5 to 1 recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings: a)The 0.1* side setback variance is appropriate since it will allow the proposed porch to match the existing side line of the house, and such a variance will have no significant impact on the neighboring property. Page 1 of 6 r b) Existing hardcover in the 75-250' zone is 39.6%. There is no hardcover in the 0-75' zone. The small lot size of 0.3 acre, and the location of the house with attached garage and minimal driveway, all support the granting of a hardcover variance. c) The proposed 10'x26' three-season porch replaces a pre existing 3 0'x26* upper level deck in the exact same location, hence the impact of the change in the nature of the structure is minimal. No lot coverage or average setback variance is required for this proposal. 4. There is 326 s.f. excess hardcover in rock and plastic landscape beds which can be removed to reduce 75-250' zone hardcover from the pre-existing 39.6% level to 36.3%. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. €. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district? that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property? would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty? is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant? and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 6 }■ !.•- -’P » % *1 1*1 1 • I III 11 i(ii f *l»»**f*>tl I M lake Minnetonka NMDCOVBt CILCaWTIOII ** fcittri — IU mcww !■ 2imt , x.t. •itm ■ 'L.A ^ % - I - M__________ — ________f.f. / t.p i.F :/ ^ C hi«»« J42£-»—/ OJ . tgO- ••ter'i££^%JS&£- TiaSJtrjjfeta-«—^ sffis.:JLi22i X If . t.r, .■>■ Uv t.^> ^ lyg I.F, •. ffnai «,.ggl la 2m • f'y ~T(W«. T«a N»iw»'«» «■ *** *2£zz^%.f. ca f7|^4'<>g3>4.(n^flg2^»— - ^ y<t>»^yc.«f9907.r 0usrt^(» m Wi tS-ZSO‘! 3^.3 /i F'J . (toci^ *5 TO fie ^3^6- tS./3.3%) DALDUR PARK ROAD •••• » I ‘R'Paae 3 of 6 k^S^^iL:. CORCLOSIONSr ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings^ the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to allow 36.3% hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone where only 25% hardcover is nornally allowed, and grants a variance to Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to allow a side yard setback for the proposed three- season porch of 9.9', where a 10' side setback is normally required, subject to the following conditions: 1.Hardcover in the 75-250' zone is approved at a level of 36.3%. All existing and proposed hardcover approved with this variance approval is recorded in the calculation worksheet and diagram enclosed with this resolution as page 3. The current property owner and all future owners of this property are placed on notice that hardcover shall not be increased above the currently approved level and any proposed improvements of this property that would result in additional hardcover must be approved by the City. Such approval may result in a requirement for concurrent equivalent or greater removals of existing hardcover. All existing hardcover scheduled for removal as a condition of this resolution must be removed prior to the footing inspection for the new construction. 2.Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a b sliding permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (Novonber 25, 1992). 3.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4.The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 4 of 6 . .. r';' *• '■ J ■V- !vi i,-- [*'•-■h iff:iv.k'K Wf;:. ► ■■ . j- i' •• • • • » Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 25th day of Novenberr 1991. ATTESTS Dorothy M. Ballinr City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Oimerts) STATE OF MINMESOTA ) ) 88. HTY OF HENNEPIN ) The fore^oin^ instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of November, 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy N. Ballln, Mayor A City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 5 of 6 --•.Ha Fs: Toi Chairman Kelley and Orono Planning Commission Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator NOV 2 5 1991 CITY OF ORONO Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Administrator Date:November 21, 1991 Subject: #1691 6 #1702 City of Long Lake, 130 Orono Orchard Road North - PRD/Conditional Use Permit» Preliminary SuMiviaion and Comprehensive Plan Amendement Pertinent Ordinances 1. 2. 3. 4. I- kv - r. Section 10.28. RR-IB Rural residential zoning requires 2 acres in area per one residential unit. Total Area « 1,067^220 s.f. or 24.5 acres Area required for 13 unit PRD » 1,132,560 s.f. or 26 acres Area variance » 65,340 s.f. or 1.5 acres. Section 10.32, PRO ** Planned Residential Development, Subd. 1-9. Application requires variance under Subdivision 2 as total number of building lots or pads exceed the number of such lots or units permissible under minumum lot size requirements of the RR-IB zoning district. Allowed ■ 12 units (Based on total acreage at 24.5 acres) Proposed “ 13 units Variance ■ 1 unit Section 10.55, Subd. 8 - Development restricted except as hereinafter specifically permitted, no filling, grading, dredging, excavation, hardcover, temporary or permanent structures, obstruction, septic systems, well or other construction shall be allowed within the Flood Plain and wetlands area nor on any lands within 26* of a wetland. Required ■ 26* Existing ■ 15* (Approximate distance from 943 elevation, OHW of lagoon) Proposed *■ 0* Variance *•26* or lOOt Section 10.55, Subd. 15 (A) (3) - Applicant seeks credit of wetlands and lagoon area based on sewering of property. *Por residential properties served by municipa'* sanitary sewer, a limited density credit may be allowed for inclusion of Flood Fringe lands a*' part of the required minimum lot area for purposes of complying with the land use density, open space, building unit to land area ratios or other simil..r requirements of the land development and zoning provisions. The owner or developer of such property will be credited with an r,. h : .w i k f, ti } W. n^irw*)SOBln9lM|e>na»UI> *^702November i5r 1991 F>9«0|(tU,,o 1. 5. ■.-’jA- amount of his land within the Flood Fringe equal to but not exceeding^ the amount that is adjacent land which otherwise qualified for development under this Chapter. Such credit shall be conditioned upon dedication of perpetual open space and flowage easements to the City over all protected areas so utilitzed for density credit.• Proposed 13 unit PRD requires minimum of 13 acres dry buildable. Existing dry buildable » 14.8 acres Wetland area ■ 9.7 acres Chapter 11 - All ordinances pertinent to Class III subdivisions. Class III subdivisions are defined as those subdivisions dealing with dedication of roadS/ utilites and drainage easements^ drainage easements over wetland and retention/sedltment ponding areas. XiiSt Of A - A-1 B - C D B F 6 B I J K L M N 0 P Q R S T 0 V Exhibits Application - Applicant's Addendum Property Owners List/Certificate of '^ailing Plat Hap Declaration of Covenant ~ Sample Settlement Agreement Joint Resolution of Cities of Long Lake 6 Orono DNR Letter 9/12/91 MCWD Letter 9/30/91 Hydrographic Work Report for Long Lake McComas Report 10/8/91 - Bonestroo, Anderllk 6 Rosene Council Action Notice 11/13/91 Orono wetland Map Flood Plain Map Map of Long Lake Creek Coa^rehensive Trail System of the City of Orono Staff Sketch of Proposed Force Main Realignment Subsurface Report for Proposed Residential and Street Construction Pace Laboratories Report on Pollution Contamination Certificate of Survey Letter from Adjacent Neighbors Map of wetland Boundary - Lot Ir Block 1 Developsient Plan Packet Includes Location Mapr Prelimin** nary Plat# Grading and Drainage Plan and Utility Plan (4 sheets) Zoning File #1691 & #1702 November 21, 1991 Page 3 Statns of J^lication #1691 and #1702 The amended comprehensive application that now Includes a conditional use permit for a Planned Residential r>.'velopment was recommended for approval at the Planning Commission meeting of Novesiber 18, 1991. All materials submitted for that review are now submitted for Council's review and conceptual action. Formal action on the preliminary plat and conditional use permit for PRD must be delayed until the City is in receipt of a prelimlnrry grading and drainage plan that provides proposed road grades and drainage improvements. It was not possible for applicant to provide the additional engineering information within the limited period of time. The purpose of the Council's review will be to review the recommendations of the Planning Commission, specifically the criteria for development to be set forth in the covenants to be filed against the Chain of Title of the property. Council is asked to comment on the suitability of some of those suggested criteria and to add others. Comprehensive Plan Aswi Per the legal agreements entered into by both the cities of Long Lake and Orono, Exhibits E and F, the City of Long Lake has filed the necessary lard use applications to implement the process. Upon completion of the City of Orono's review and the formal acceptance of the findings of that review by the City of Long Lake, the subject property will be annexed by the City of Long Lake. All development of t* property will be administered by the personnel of Long Lake per the criteria set forth in the covenants to be filed against the Chain of Title of the property. Refer to the sample covenant enclosed in your packets. Exhibit D. This covenant is to be expanded to include development controls desired by both the City of Long Lake and as required by the ordinances of the City of Orono. This comprehensive plan amendment application will oe incorporated with the recently approved Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 3 that includes other rural areas serviced with sewer yet retaining the existing rural residential zoning. Prelimimery Subdivision The subdivision is to be known as Fleming Trail Addition. The wastewater treatment facility that formerly occupied this property was abandoned some tine in the early 1960's. The original facility was installed sometime in the very early 60's. Today the only thing that remains is the MWCC lift station property that appears as the exception on the plat drawings and an underground force main. The 16* force main runs from the lift station to Orono Orchard Road and is located within the actual traveled road that serves as access for MWCC service trucks in addition to the Long Lake vehicles that use the current facility for exterior storage. r T' * Zoning File #1691 6 11702 November 21, 1991 Page 4 Refer to Exhibit Note the 1-1/2 acre wetland designated as Glenco soils to the south of the sewer pond. This area was filled at the time of the original installation of th . sewer pond back in the early 60's. Review Steve McComas' report. Exhibit J, specifically the last paragraph on Page 1, he notes that at this point in the 1990's there are no indicators that would characterize this area as a wetland area any longer based on the hydrology and vegetation. As a result, this area is now classified as dry buildable. Once again refer to Exhibit L, the area to the north designated at 1/2 acre Glenco soils has been partially filled# the applicant proposed the use of this area once again as a sediment pond/detention area for devexopment run off. Review Exhibit V, grading and drainage plan shet.t 3. Upon final resolve of the drainage plan for this project, ppropriate easements will be taken over detention/retentior areas and drainageways. Please refer to Hr. MaComas' report (Exhibit J and Exhibit U). At a site inspection, staff delineated the boundaries of the wetlands based on hydrology and vegetation, in reviewing the proposed building pad for Lot 1, Block 1, it appears that the 26' setoack may not have been maintained along the northwest side of the pad. Staff will reconfirm the setbacks with the applicant's consultants prior to your formal approval of the preliminary plat. in a PRD subdivision total dry buildable areas can be credited within the road outlots and the area to be dedicated for road purposes along Orono Orchard Road. Each of the pads contain Approximately 1.04 acres in area. Note the flexibility offered. Under the FRD there is no need to maintain 1 acre within each building pad and the developer need not use RR-lB setback standards. Applicant requests special setbacks as shown in Exhibit V, Sheet 2. The setbacks requested are 35' front and rear and 10' sides. Pads 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 propose a 50* rear, 35* street setback and 10* side. This is an attempt by applicant to address the concerns of the adjacent neighbors receiving most ioipact. Note Pad 1, Block I's building envelope has been opened up by relocating an additional unit t he east side. Pad 1 within Block 2 appears to be severely re the 16* force main intersecting the pad in half. Th consider asking future developer to relocate the force m. on alternatives suggested in staff sketch. Exhibit P. -ted by .ty may n based Review Page 2 of applicant's addendem. Exhibit A-1. Nr. Roos's coaments note there is a 50' x 125' building site between the easment and the front setback and a 60* x 110* building site tween the easement and the rear setback. He feels these are equate building areas but would forward staff's comments to the ueveloper. The City Council should provide direr:ion on this issue. Zoning File 11691 & #1702 November 21# 1991 Page 5 Road and Utilities The plat road is designated at a 50' width with 100' cul-de- sac. The extension road starting at the southwest corner of pad/Lot 12 shall be designated as a separate road outlot and should be developed at the time t'e roadway serves the development on the north side of the Burlington Northern Railroad. Note an access easement must be obtained from the MWCC if this is to be realized. In preliminary discussions with applicant's consultants they were asked to provide Information as to the potential development densities on the north side of the Burlington Northern Railroad. Please review Page 2 of Exhibit A- 1. Nr. Roos advises there have been no plats proposed for the development of this property but there is potential for 16 to 50 units depending on type of development and restrictions by the regulatory agency. The property is zoned R-5r Multiple Family Residential and there is approximately 5.2 acres of dry buildable area. Applicant has realigned the curb cut at Orono Orchard Road in response to an Orono resident's concern for impact of car lights. With the moving of the road it becomes necessary to raise the elevation of the roadway as it approaches Orono Orchard Road to improve sighting as plat road is moved closer to the curve and hill. Final preliminary grading and drainage plans must provide detail on entrance section of road. To be consistnet with Long Lake's policy, the roadway will be public. All municipal utilities will be publicly owned and maintained. Sewer to serve Lot 1, Block 1 will come from Orchard Drive on the south !e of Orono Orchard Road. Water serving all of the lots will also cone fron the Orchard Meadows ^ylat on the south side of the road. Sewer to Pads 1-12 will come from a line extending from the MWCC lift station. The City of Orono will not ask for final engineering plans for the interior plat road or utilities as the improvements will be installed at the time the property is de-annexed by the City of Orono. The Public Hor’ Department has asked that any disruption of Orono Orchard Roa«*' the expansion of municipal services should require the repaxi of the road to its original state. Please review Exhibit O. Note the comprehensive trail system approved by the City shows a trail extending northward along Orono Orchard Road to the south side of the Luce Line Trail. There is no trail extension north of the Luce Line Trail nor was it planned by the City as the northern portions of Orono Orchard Road are surrounded by both Orono and Long Lake properties. Zt may be appropriate for the City to encourage discussions between the cities' Park Commissions regarding a trail connecting to the Luce Line. This issue is raised in response to Mr. Kellenberger's letter, Exhibit T, and other comments raised at the first public hearing on this application. Zoning Fil« «1691 i #1702 November 21, 1991 Page 6 Orainage/Plood Plain/Netlai»ds The DNR has determined the Ordinal y Water Mark of the pond/lagoon area is 943'. The top of th--* bank of the lagoon is at 947 elevation. Cook has reviewed the hydraulic information submitted by applicant in determining the flood plain elevation. It fs^tpearj the flood plain elevation is at approximately 947.3*. Baseh on previous lews and the standards of th«> MCWD, all run-* off from development must be retained above the fl'^od plain elevation. The sewer pond area cannot serve as a retention area because it is belcv the 947.3 elevation. Retention must be provided at the higher elevations. Major portin'.s of the surface run-off from the development will now be directed to the retention pond located within Pads 11 and 12. Th- riajor cut in the cul-de-sac portion of the road will tc’ the majority of drainage from Pads 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. The rear or easterly elevations of Pads 3, 7 and 8 will flow as driinage currently flows through the drainage network of the Orono Oaks plat. The rear portions of Pads 1 and 2 will flow eastward to a wetland in the Orono Oaks plat via a culvrrt under Orono Oaks Drive. Fad 1, Block I's drainage will flow predominantly to the wetland to the north and the creek. Appropriate drainage easements will be taken within Pads 11 and 12 and over all drair.ageways created to support the interior drainage system. Eventually drainage from the detention area in Pads 11 and 12 will drain either to the lagoon or directly to the creek depending upon the final determinations of the MCWD. .Applicant's final grading and drainage plan shall provide detail on how drainage shall be conveyed from retention pond to eit*^sr lagoon or Long Lake Creek. gracing plan. Exhibit V- «et 3, shows the elevation of first habitable floor of each pad. Note all elevations meet required elevation (948.3 or 1 above flood plain elevatioi.). Hanning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission g:a.nted approval of the co*npxel/ensive land use application of the City of Long Lake seeking approval of variances to .*?ection 10.32, Subd. 2 for 13 units where only 12 units would be si .owed based on total acreage at 24.5 acres and a variance to V'<^ction 10..^5, Subd. 8 to permit the further <;■ v..Toachment of a irr.adway into a designated wetli:nd an grants , onditxonal use permit for a Planned Residential Development of 13 lots and approves a Comprehensive Plan Anendner that would allow the extension of sewer and water to the rurax zoned properl:y requiring a realignment within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area o the City. Approval of the variances are based on cither one or more of the following findings: L Zoning Pile #1691 & #1702 November 21, 1991 Page 7 1.Thte 13 unit density was agreed upon in a Settlement Agreement between the cities of Long Lake and Orono. 2.Based on the PRD format of developmentr applicant could obtain 1-1/2 acres of adjacent wetlands to achieve total acreage requirement. The wetlands to the west cannc> be developed based on current restrictions of other regulatory agencies. 3.Findings/hardships for encroachment of road into designated wetland: a. Steep topographies along east side of plat road would result in major land alterations if road was to be constructed to the east rather than the west. Location of mature evergreen trees along east side of existing/proposed road. Based on the topography and location of lagoon the only other alternative for access to this property would bo via a private road in the City of Orono. b. c. The Plannin:! Commission adopted the conditions of the staff recoomendation which are as follows: 1. Final preliminary grading and drainage plan to Include: a. b. c. d. Detail on entrance road section. Detail on drainage plan for retention pond within Pads 11 and 12 and outlet to either lagoon or Long Lake Creek. If availab] all amendments or additions to plan requested by .nOiD per preliminary permit review. Detail on section of cul-de-sac road as it begins to encroach the higher elevations within the northeast section of the property. Note the amended pim must be submitted to the City before the Council meeting of December 9th to allow adequate time for staff review. 2.Declaration a. Build includ firs' b. City of Covenants t-o include the following: t pads approved for each of the 13 pads to uch information as setbacksr elevation of ibltable floors approved drainage pattern. : Long Lake or future developer to obtain necessary permit approvals from the Corps of Engineers and the DNR as expai. ad roadbed wiii encroach the DNR protected wetlands. The following are criteria developed by the Planning lission for inclusion «n the covenants: Zoning File fI691 & #1702 November 21, 1991 Page 8 e'.- C. Natural vegetation be maintained within 50' setback area along east side of plat and that landscaping either in the form of land alterations or plantings be provided within the lower elevations along the east side lot lines. Pads 1-3, Block 2.* •8^.0 A3.. 4.^ Entrance monuments to be limited to a specific height to be determined by the City Engineer in light of the sighting concerns at entrance to plat. * James Palmer of 1350 Orono Oaks Drive has contacted staff since the meeting. He noted that in earlier meetings with the officials of the City of Orono, there was discussion as to a need to define permanent barrier to Orono Oaks Drive for residents in proposed Orono Oaks subdivision. Staff would ask Council if an additional covenant might net address the following concern of Nr. Palmer: "No permanent, temporary or informal vehicular or pedestrian access shall be permitted to Orono Oaks Drive, a private road within the City of Orono, for Lots 1, 2, 3, 7 and 8.* Each pad shall be limited to 15% of lot coverage. s shall include footprint area of all structures wi'r.ln building pads. The following shall not be permitted within the residential PRD: a. b. c. d. e. Guest houses Rental apartments Home occupations Duplex use Keeping of domestic animals for non commercial purposes (this does not include normal household pets) Appropriate public easements to be taken over all uti'^lities and drainageways not included within public toad right-of-ways. Final plat should show road names rather than outlets if roads are to be public. Final plat to designate lagoon/pond as an outlot. Open space easement shall be taken over the outlot to insure density credit for wetlands per PRD ordinance. Drainage easements are to be shown over the entire pond defined as a DNR protected wetland with specific numerical designation. All wetland areas or additional retention areas are to be designated with drainage easements. p Zoning File #1691 & *1702 Hovember 21» 1991 Page 9 Long Lake Creek shall be designated as a drainage easement on the final plat. Along the northern portions it can be designated at a 25' minimal width as it extends southward within the area of the outlet from the lagoon and the culvert under Orono Orchard Road, the easement should be expanded to Include the area of the outlet of the lagoon at the east to the top of the bank at the west. The residential pad shall be designated as lots on the final plat. It is recommended that 10* drainage and utility easements be provided along all exterior boundaries of each lot. Drainage and utility easements need only be shown at 5* widths on either side of Interior lot lines. 1 Final resolve of the water quality issues raised by the Watershed District in their preliminary review. As already noted by the Orono consultant, there appears to be a negligible Impact on water quality. Applicant to develop a final development plan that will include all necessary Information for the development of each residential lot. The development plan shall be referenced in the covenants and included as an exhibit with these covenants. The development plan should include all building pads with special setbacks, first habitable floor elevation, approved drainage pattern, special restrictions for lots along east border where a 50* setback area is proposed and location of entrance monuments if planned. tell Aotlao Provide staff with conceptual direction so that a v;ormal resolution can be prepared for Council action at their December 9, 1991 meeting. CITY OP ORONO - _ _ PROPERTY LOCATION BJ_ ftTT •K^'^ V'.*W- - - Site Address Fnr^»r Tnna T.:»lrP TreatmeP*- V^riUtV Site-----l3o Orcpna Oy chiUrcLR^ ^ 35-118-23-32-0005 35-118-23-33-0001 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ,35-118-23-32-000^- - Please check one ** Property X abstract or . , torrens? Attach legal description to application^_^_See jjelim^lnary nat Phone (home) ----APPLICANT jg££ Roos. City Engineer City of Long Lake Phone (work)476-6010 c/o McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. Address: 15050 23rd Ave. North City: Plymouth, Mn_.—Zip: 55447 ONNER (if different than applicant)Phone (hone) Name Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: (attach list if more than one) KSTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels 3_ _ _ Development Sise , 20.0_ _ _ 5.Q - Oif Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels CITY Of ORONO finance office Present Use (check}Residential? no. of Other (specify) Cicv Scoraa|^j,.Mlsc^----i^j,00 miPT-Tim rw PROPOSAL Present Zoning District rr-ib_____________ Ji224jA(L 0001 ROl 703:3 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _^ 6^/23/9. Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearraiigement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sitei. Number of Building Sites: P-V Existing Jnits New Units Total Units r'. s: Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: lAc./ Proposed Use: (check) Units per 1.92 Acres } ac. min. Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land * Residential Other (specify) r,* Refer to narrative regarding Lot 1, Block 1 h r F'r •F : k' ■ f- McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 15050 23rd Avenue Nort*i PlymouJn ^1•r^es3ta S';-!-! 476-60 ’0 612 ^76-8532 PAX Suf .eyc'^ Novenber 15. 1991 Ms. Jeanne Mabusth, Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323*0066 SUBJECT:City of Long Lake. Minnesota Fleming Trail Addition Application #1691 MFRA #7085 Dear Ns. Mabusth: At the recommendation of the Orono Staff, Planning Commission and City Council, we are resubmitting this project as a request for a PRO. There also have been minor changes made to the street and lot configurati'-'n. The following information is given in response to the questi^ons of which we are aware: SETBACKS: 50' setback from the coiaoon property lines with the lots in Orono Oaks 10* sideyard setbacks 35' front yard setbacks except for Lot 1. Block 1 30' setback from Long Lake Creek 25' front yard setback on Lot 1, Block 1 DRAINAGE: .‘t is proposed to have the storm sewer system outlet into a sediment pond location between Lots 11 and 12, Block 2. This pond will then outlet into either Long Lake Creek or the large existing pond. This complies wxth the policies of the MCWD for quantity and quality control. It is subject to their final approval. BUILDING ENVELOPES: There are two lots with which you had concern. Let 1, BLock 1 and Lot ) Block 2. On Lot 1, Block 1. there is an envelope of about 5,000 ♦ square feet. Using the 947.3 contour, the 30’ setback from Long Lake Creek, the wetland boundary £ind a 25' setback from Orono Orchard Road. This is an adequate building site. An Equal Opportunity Emp oyer /^ I- Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Novciauer 15. 1991 Page Two !;-■ ;r I r I: f. r,' ii? Ir I I I M' 1'^-&•' Lot 1, Block 2 has the 20* MWCC forcemain easement. You suggested^that we consider relocating the forcemain. As it sits, there is a 50 ^ building site between the easement and the front setback, and a bO x lit) building site between the easement and the rear setback. These are adequate building areas: however . I will foi-ward your recommendation to the developer. HEADLIGHTS The proposed street has been realigned, so that it does not enter Orono Orchard Road directly across from the existing home. In addition, the street will have a slight downgrade for the last 150 feet. This will improve sight distances at the corner and reduce headlight glare. 6.20 Acres 1.80 Acres 0.60 Acres 14.80 Acres 8.80 Acres 1.04 Acres AREAS Pond Area Wetland Area Sediment Pond Lots and Street Area Outlot A Area Average Lot Area WOLF PROPERTY The property north of the Burlington Northern Railroad is presently zoned R“5 "Multiple Family Residential". As you know, a large part of this area is on existing wetland, so it is difficult to determine just how much is usable. It appears, from the U.S.C.S map. that approximately 5-2 acres of non>wetland space is available. There have been no proposed plats received for the development of this property. The potential is there for l6 to 52 units, depending on type of development and restrictions by the regulatory agencies. ELEVATIONS OHW 0 day - 100-yecr Floodplain •^43.7- ^ 947.3 I trust this information and the revised drawing are adequate for your review. Please call if you have any questions. Very truly yours. McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES. INC. JJOUiJ Enclosures r[ f; 'ftft' T- i r .r. ft- r-- t. ft CBRTIPICATB OP MAILIIIG STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) 6S. ) CITY OF ORONO ) I, Jamie Boamar of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1702, was mailed to the attached list of property owners. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 1st day of November, 1991. L - . ■ s fc'T' ■- . r- * ^7 r.:- •r. h: ■ ■> ^ ■fv 1'^ MM BATE oe/ti/n HEftCPIN COUNTY PROPfRTY INFOmUTIQN SYSTEM PROPERTY OMCRS LIST REPORT NO. PIASS401 PAGE 14 MTCN 00* OMNiR NIMB TANPAVtR NMC/AOOR M S4-1IR«ZS 44 OOOS OOlSS OMNO ORCHARD RO N EOHUNO N F RVOfU EOMMO RVOBU 1S5 ORONO ORCHARD RD LOND UKt IM S5S64 56 55-118-25 52 0004 00056 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO VIL OF LOND LAKE CITY OF LOND LAKE PO BOX L - 1464 PARK AVE LONG LAKE HN 55556 ro 55-116-25 55 0001 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIONEO VII OF LOND LAKE CITY OF LONS LAKE PO BOX L - 1964 PAIM AVE LONS LAKE IM 55556 PROP ADOR TAXPAYER MRM/ADOR 56 SB«I16-CS 55 6005 OOlOS ORONO ORCHARD RO N BAD RELLEMKROER OREO S RfILENBERCER lOS ORONO OmHARD RO LOND LARE HN BS5B6 56 55-116-25 55 0004 00025 ORONO ORCHARD RD N GLORIA G GILMER GLORIA G GILMER 25 ORONO ORCHARD RO N LONG LAKE »M 55556 56 55-116-25 55 0007 01555 ORONO OAKS DA 0 H SNAN AMR SHAN DONALD H A MARLENE R SNAN 1555 ORONO OAKS OR LONG LAKE Ml 55556 ••• OMCR NAME TAIMAVER NAHE/AOOR 56 St>U6-25 55 OOOB OISAS ORONO OARS OR D N FRANCHOT III ET AL 0 N FRANCHOT III/A T BARRALL IBAB ORONO OARS OR LONG LARS m 555SA 56 55-118-25 55 0009 00020 ORONO ORCHARD RO N CHEYEMC LAND COMPANY NOMELL F FREEMAN 20 ORONO ORCHARD RO NAYATA M4 55591 56 55-116-25 55 0010 00050 ORONP ORCHARD RD N J L MURPHY ASS SMITH JAMES MURPHY A SANDRA SMITH 50 ORONO ORCHARD RO N NAYZATA IM 55591 OMCR NAME TAXPAYER HAME/AOOR 55-116-25 54 0005 ORONO ORCHARD RO N D A 6 STRUVK 0 A A 6AR5ARA A STRUVR 40 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD N NA''?ATA Ml 65591 56 55-116-25 54 0006 01550 ORONO OARS DR J J A S A PALMER JAMES A SHIRLEY PALMER 1550 ORONO OARS ORIVE LONG LARE HI 55556 56 55-116-25 54 0007 01520 ORONO OAKS OR D 0 A A N CARLSON NILLIAM A BEVERLY JEWCY JR 1520 ORONO OAKS OR LONG LARE HI 55556 TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 56 55-116-25 54 0006 00056 ADDRESS UIASSIGNEO C D NOUN A E N NOLAN CHARLES e/ELlZASETH M NOLAN 455 OLD CRYSTAL SAY RO ' LONS URf m 55556 3-116-2S 54 0015 01555 ORONO OAKS OR CHEYEHC LAND COMPANY SUZAMC K NELSON 1555 ORONO OAKS OR LONG LARE MN 55556 72 54-116-25 41 0005 00260 ORONO ORCHARD RO RICHARD P09UETTE ETAL RICHARD POOUETTE 260 ORONO C«<CHARO RD LONG LARE HlHI 55556 TAXPAYER 72 54-116-25 41 0051 OOIM ORCHARD CIR R A L NECONOVXCH R N A I T HECOMOVXCN 165 ORCHARD CIR lOND LAKE Ml 55556 72 54-116-25 41 0052 00167 ORCHARD CIR NESLEY S 6EN01CRS0N ETAL NESLEY A JULIA BENOICKSON 167 ORCHARD CIR LOND LAKE HI 55556 72 54-118-25 41 0055 00169 ORCHARD CXR C A J MORRISON CLINTON H MORRISON 189 ORCHARQ CIR LONG LARE HI 55556 . i >• h ■V '=>0.WN DATE 08/t«/n HE»tC^lN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OMCRS LIST MTCH 00« OMCR NAME TAMPAVIR HANE/AOOR PROP AOOR OtCR NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR OtCR NAME TAXPAYER NAMB/AOOR ONCR NAME TAMPAVtR NHC/ADOR « HAME TA»CAVER NME/AOOR TAMPAVtR NAME/AOOR fcrV j • f 7t SB>11R-ES SE 0007 0007E AOORESS UNASS16NE0 BURLINBTQN NORTHERN RY BURLINBTON NORTHERN RY 7E S1-I10>2S S2 0020 OlMl NAVZATA ILVO N R C t J M ROROEN RICHARD t RORDEN MOB SALLY LANE EOINA Ml BBOSS 72 $B-110-2S S2 0027 OlMl MAYZATA RLVD N KEITH J RASNEk KEITH J OASNER IMl NAYZATA RLVD N APT P LONR LAKE Ml 6SSS4 72 SB-U0-2S 52 0050 OIBTB NAVZATA RLVO N DARLX8 N0RDNA6EN DARLXR J N0R0HA6EN IBP^ N NAYZATA RLVD UNIT A LONR LAKE Ml 6SS5A 72 SS-IlR-25 52 0055 outs NAYZATA RLVD N N N NtfCEN ET At TRUSTEES tNALCOlN N NAN5EN fCiO RORERT FRENCH BIDR RAIOLE DR SUITE %50 ST LOUIS PARK Ml BBOIt 72 SB-ilR*25 52 OOM OIBOB NAYZATA RLVO N LORRAINE N NIICHEL LORRAINE N NIICHEL IBVB N NAVZATA RLVD UNIT 0 LOND LAKE Ml BS5A4 REPORT NO. PX4SBA0I PASE 14 72 55>11S<25 52 0022 01401 NAYZATA RLVO H JOHN A JOHNSON JOHN A JOHNSON BRIMSTONE HILL RO AMHERST NH 03031 f' 72 S5-118-23 B2 002S OlMl NAYZATA OtVD N R C A J N MROEN RXCHARO C BORDEN 6605 SALLY LANE EOINA m 55655 72 55*110*25 52 0025 01601 NAYZATA BLVO N RICHARD C BORDEN DErtllS I HC6REEVY 1601 NAYZATA BLVO N UNIT D LONG LAKE HN 55556 72 55-118*25 52 0026 01601 NAYZATA BLVO N TARA NARIE LXNOEEN TARA N LXNOEEN 1601 NAYZATA BLVO N APT E LONG LAKE rtl 55556 72 55*118*25 52 0028 01601 NAYZATA BLVO N RICHARD C BOROEN JANES N LYNCH 1601 NAYZATA BLVO N APT G LONG LAKE m 55556 72 55-118*25 52 0029 01601 NAYZATA BLVO N I S N HABUSTH t N P CALLAHAN STUART HABUSTH/HARY CALLAHAN 1601 NAYZATA BLVO APT H LONG LAKE m 55556 72 55*118*25 52 0051 01595 NAYZATA BLVO N H H HANSEN ET AL TRUSTEES NALCOLN H HANSEN C/0 ROBERT FRENCH 5100 GAIfILC OR SUITE 650 ST LOUIS PARK ffi 55616 72 55*11B*25 52 0052 01595 NAYZATA BLVO N H H HANSEN ET AL TRUSTEES NALCOLN H HANSEN C/0 ROBERT FRENCH 5100 GAMBLE OR SUITE 450 ST LOUIS PARK Itl 55616 K 72 55-118*25 52 0056 01595 NAYZATA 5LVQ N IH H HANSEN ET AL TRUSTEES NALCOLN H HANSEN r/Q ROBERT FRENCH ssiOO GAMBLE OR SUITE 650 ST LOUIS PARK MN 55616 72 55*118*25 52 C055 01595 NAYZATA BLVO N N H HANSEN ET AL TRUSTEES NALCON H HANSEN C/0 ROBERT FRENCH 5100 GAMIE DR SUITE ^Vi ST LOUIS PARK m 556i; 72 ? i*Ua*25 52 0037 01595 NAYZATA BLVO N CURTIS S GUSTAFSON ET AL CURTIS GUSTAFSON 5729 JUNEAU LA N 'LyifCUTH m 55666 72 55*118*25 52 0058 015B5 NAYZATA BLVO N BEVERLY A Y0UNES8 BEVERLY A Y0UNES8 1565 A NEST NAYZATA BLVB LONG LAKE m 55556 1 r rrF h t ■ pi-''fy- C - • f ii- i'-- ^ : y>-. fc t •<L 1%*fo" ■ I- --;' ^ • If'--,^.- ; -• MM OATi ea/t«/n HEMCPZN •ATCN «04 OMMI NM TAMPAym NMC/AOM 7t SI-1U-<S St 00S7 OmS NAVZATA M.VS N B TRUSTBfS, OF SHEET HETAL MOBKERS ^BAVSHOM TOMMOHES INC C/0 HAIMICE J NA6ENEB imO NAVZATA BLVD N* AETOIMA m SBS4S TANFAYER NMM/AOOR 7t SS-lIB-ES SC OOM OIBAS NAVZATA BLVD N E TF*IBTEES OF SHEET NETAL NORRERS Ba VSHORI ifBtMONES INC C/O NRURICE J NABCNER ICSCO NAVZATA BLVD NINNETONU tM BSS4S MOB ABOR OMMR HAHi TANBAVER NMM/AOOR 7C sr«iio«cs sc oo«s outs NAVZATA BLVD N SOtfTlMOOO SHORES TQMNHOUSE OOlflHNOOO SNORES TOUEWUSE C/O DERRICK LAND CO ItSO SHELARO TONER ST LOUn BARR HN BS4C* COUNTY PROPERTY INFORfMTION SYSTEM PROPERTY OMCRS LIST REPORT NO. PACE PXASS401 IS 7C S5-11B-2S SC 0058 OISAB NAYZATA BLVD H C TRUSTEES OF SIIEET METAL NQRKEP» PATRICIA J BERNEY •C 1SA5 NAYZATA BLVD H LONQ LAKE Ml 55S56 72 S5-Ua>2S SC cost 015AS NAYZATA BLVD N 0 TRUSTEES OF SHEET tCTAL NORRERS BAYSHORE TOMHOHES INC C/O MAURICE J NA6ENER 12520 NAVZATA BLVD HIMCTOKA Ml BSS4S 72 S5-118-2S S2 OOAl OUAB NAYZATA BLVD N F TRUSTEES^OF SHEET NETAL NORRERS ■' M*' .MORE TCRMHOHES INC C/O NAUMICE J NAGENER 12520 NAYZATA BLVO NlltCTOMU NN S5S4S 72 S5-11B-2S S2 00A2 OlAOl NAYZATA BLVO N SOUTHNOOD SHORES TOMMOUSE SOUntOOO SHORES TOMMOUSE C/O DERRICK LAND CO 1650 SHELARO TONER ST LOUIS PARK MN 55426 72 Zi 11S-2S S2 0064 OlSa** KAYZATA »LVO N SOUTHNOOO.SHOHES TOHNHOUSE SOUTIMIOO SHORES TOH^<HOUSE C/O DERRICK LAND CO 16.^9 SNELARO TONER ST 3U1S PARK m 55426 TOTAL BATCH 006 00060 Oi C.O I 6 - 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRIX REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RE] OF THE HEIMEPXN COUNTY DEPARTMENT .OF PROPERCT lANRTION* TO THIi AEST OF MY KNQNLEOGE AND BELIEF. DATE f/jVMA. )h\ It, , ' ■L f .'.i-tiii-i/ . J ...... MM DATE OS/t«^.A M1CN OtM PMM AOM TAXPAYER NMC/ADOR 7Z «-'• 01!«' C t CALV. lS8S»->. LONB LARv '^2 OOSY iA BIVO N STECRE 'ZAYA BLVD 5SS54 HEWCPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEN PROPERTY ONNERS LIST B 72 S5-11B-2S 52 OOAO 01565 HAYZATA BIVO M TRUSTEES OF SNEET HETAL BAVSMORE TOttAWMES INC C/0 HAURICC J HA6ENER 12520 NAY/ATA BI.VO MIMCTONKA rtl 555A5 C lERS REPORT NO. PX4S5401 PAGE 17 72 5S-11B-25 52 OOAl 01565 NAYZAT* BLVO N TRUSTEES OF SHEET HETAL i'BAYSNORC tOMINOHES INC C/0 HAURICE J KAGEICR 12520 NAYZATA BLVO NINNETOMU )tl S55Y5 0:ers PROP AOOR OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 72 5B-11B-25 52 0062 018B5 NAYZATA BLVO N E TRUSTEES OP SHEET HETAL NORAEH: SAVSHORtf TOMBiaHES INC C/0 MAUUCS J HA6ENER 12520 NAYZATA BLVO NmCTOMCA »M 55545 72 55-UB-25 52 0045 01575 NAYZATA BLVO M 0 TRUSTEES OP SHEET METAL HORKERS (BAYSH0RE7 TOMBiaHES INC 'C/0 MAURICE J NAGCNER 12520 NAYZATA BLVO NIMCTOMIA Ml 55545 PROP AOOR 72 55-1:4-25 52 0046 01575 NAYZATA BLVO N F - - -.- - TRUSTEES.OF SHEET HETAL NORKERS TAXPAYER tTBAYSNOREKrOMM. ~S INC NAME/AOOR ^CAI MAURICE J HER 12520 NAYZATA ...VO MIMCTONKA Ml 55545 72 55-116-25 52 0051 01555 NAYZATA BLVO N B TRUSTEES OP SHEET HETAL NORKERS BAYSHORE TOMHQHPS INC C/0 MAURICE jt UAOENER 12520 NAYZATA BLVO NXMCTOMU Ml 55545 72 55-116-25 52 0054 01555 NAYZATA BLVO N E TRUSTEES OP SNEET METAL NORKERS BAYSNORS! TQMBI0NE4 INC C/0 NRURZCB J HACCNER 12570 NAYZATA BLVO NXIME10NU Ml 55545 OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NAW/AOOR €J i 7AWAVCII NME/AOM 72 S5-118-2S IZ 004S 01585 NAYZATA BLVD N F rmisTCES OF sneer hetal norkers BAYSHORE TCItIHOHES INL C/0 HAURICE J KAGENER 12520 HAYZATA BLVO HUtCTONPCA m SBM 72 S5-118-2S 32 0046 01575 NAYZATA BLVD N C TRUSTEES u: SHEET METAL NORKERS »BAYSHORE TONtMQHES INC C/0 HAURICE J NAGENER 12520 NAYZATA BLVD HimETGNKA m 55343 72 35*118-23 32 0044 01575 NAYZATA BLVD H F TRUSTEES OF SHEET HETAL NORKERS BAYSHORE TCMtIOhES INC C/O HAURICE J NAGENER 12520 NAYZATA BLVD HIIMTONKA HN 55343 72 35-118-23 32 0052 01555 HAYZATA BLVD H C TRUSTEEf OF SHEET HETAL NORKERS BAYSHOn* TOmHGHES INC C/0 HAURICE J NAGENEP 12520 NAf^ZATA BLVD m»t€TQNKA m 55343 72 35-118-23 32 0055 01555 NAYZATA BLVD N F TRUSTEES OF SHEET HETAL NORHEPS BAYSHORE TOmHONES INC 4 /O HAURICE J NAGENER 12520 NAYZATA BLVD HIMIETrrACA m 55343 72 35-118-23 32 iiu44 01575 NAYZATA BLVD N A IRUSTEES OF SHEET HFTAI NORKERS BAYSHORE FONNHOHES INC C/O HAURICE J NAGENER 12520 NAYZATA BLVD Hir#IET0r8(A FBI 557^3 72 35-11B-23 32 0047 01575 NAYZATA BLVD N 0 TRUSTEES OF ;>HEET HETAL NORKERS BAYSHORE TCM4H0HES INC ' C/G HAURICE J HAGEK^R 12520 HAYZATA BLVD HlftCTONCA rt: >5343 72 35-118-2c I OOr^ 01555 NAYZA' . BLVt A TRUSTEES.OF SiiLET HE ORKERS f BAYSHORE TCMB«OHES 7K ^ C/0 FAURICE J NAGENER 12520 HAYZATA BLVD HINNETCMCA m 55343 V 3—llB-23 32 0053 C ^55 NAYZATA BLVD N D TRUSTEES^OF SHEET HETAL NORK£l» BAYSHORF^TOMBIOMES INC C/O HAURICE ^ NAGENER 12520 KAYL BLVO KirtCTONCA HN 55343 72 3S-11B-23 32 0054 01545 NAYZATA BLVD N A TRUSTEES OF SHEET HETAL NORKERS CHARLES J i VICKI A NAGENER •A 1^5 *'AYZA1A BLVD N LONG UL\t m 55354 RUN OATC Oa/26/91 MTCH 006 MEfOCPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY mOIERS LIST REPORT NO. PX6S540X PAGE 15 PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR CMCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP ADDR OltCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 72 SA-118*23 61 0056 OOin ORCHARD CIR P B ELL1NG80E ET AL PAUL B ELLINGBOE 191 ORCHARD CIR LONG LAKE MN 55556 72 56-118-25 66 0016 00167 NEADQN LA JOHN B NENMAN JOHN B NENMAN 167 MEAOOH LANE LONG LAKE rt4 55556 72 56-118*25 66 0017 00175 HEADON LA CAP ROSE CHARLES E ROSE 175 HEADON LA LONG LAKE Hi 55556 72 56-118-25 66 0020 00179 HEADON LA N I A HC INTVAt NILLIAM E MC INTYRE 179 MEAOOH LA LONG LAKE Hi 55556 72 55-118-25 51 0001 01525 HAYZATA BLVD H TAM NOLF THEODORE F HOLF 2622 COUNTY ROAD 26 LONG LAKE Hi 55556 72 56-110-25 61 0055 00195 ORCHARD CIR P M SCHOON ACT SCHOON PETER M A CARLA F SCHOON 195 ORCHARD CIR LOeiG LAKE MN 55556 72 56-110-25 66 0015 00169 MEAOOH LA J M TODD APB TODD JAMES M TODD AND PATRICIA D TOOO 169 MEACOH LA LONG LAKE Hi 55667 72 56-118-25 66 0016 00175 MEAOOH LA M J DALTON A S J DALTON MICHAEL J DALTON 175 MEAOOH LANE LONG LAKE Hi 55556 72 56-118-25 66 0021 00181 MEADOH LA D A A C A TRUDELL DAVID A CYNTHIA THUDELL 181 MEAOOH LANE LONG LAKE Hi 55556 72 35-118-25 51 0029 00287 GLErttOOR LA M C FELLGER ETAL MERILL C FELLGER 267 GLEfDIOOR LANE LONG LAKE MN 55556 72 56-110-23 66 0015 00165 MEAOOH LA J K ANDERSON A J L ANDERSON JAMES K A JOAN L ANDERSON 165 MEADOH LA LONG LAKE Hi 55356 72 56-118-25 66 0016 00171 MEADOH LA NANCY M SHAVER NANCY M SHAVER 171 MEADOH LANE LONG LAKE Hi 55556 72 56-110-23 66 0019 00177 MEAOOH LA T A L VETTEL THOMAS G VETTEL 177 MEADOH LA LONG LAKE MN 55556 72 56-118'25 66 0022 00185 MEADOH LA R E C HILSON ARE KILSON RICHARD a RHONDA HILSON 165 MEADOH LA LONG LAKE MN 55556 72 55-116-25 51 0050 00275 GLENMOOR LA 6 I J EDHAROS GLENN E EDHARDS 275 GLENMOOR LANE long lake MN 55556 PROP ADDR ohner name TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 72 55-118-25 52 0001 01525 HAYZATA BLVD N THEODORE f NOLF THEODORE F HOLF 2622 COUNTY ROAD 26 LONG LAKE MN 55556 72 35-118-25 52 0006 00260 ORONO ORCHARD RD RICHARD POQUETTE ETAL RICHARD POQUETTE 260 ORONO ORCHARD RD LONG LAKE HlHi 55556 72 55-118-25 52 0005 00072 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO VIL OF LONG LAKE CITY OF LONG LAKE PO BOX L - 1966 PARK AVE LONG LAKE MN 55556 DS:CLARAT.vN Or P THIS declaration OF COVENANTS is r.aie_thxs 1991, iy and between i.ic. ^ .A. lf« ^ cav of ■ '^vi—^<-»r—irtra^'■ ''T ("0*'Onc’'); and THE CITY Cr LCS3 -AK:., flmunicipal cor?orac*-n ' ,y , municipal corporation ( Long La.<e i. recitals Long Lake U the fee owner cf . ft- Ex'^ibit A attac.’^.ed hereto ( whe i^*'V’ ’ it u%'iT„r.^;'t*’£'L"4'iaL"r;S'Sro« . n .on n, test.ictio^ allow the intended development v- -he ..Ct^e. . / NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration ^s^bereby good and valuable conaldarition, the ‘ Acknowledged, Long Lake and Crone agree as .o.^ows. 1, The Property has been reaor.ed by Orono co a classification of______________________________—----------------- which allo'^s th6 . ■ ■ •—^ and is s'Jbject to "the following conditions: 2. “^he Property has been replatted by Orono as 3 The Property shall be developed into no more w.na^ .wiJ:./??3re?nole family lota, the configurati. of wnicn .s set forth on Exhibit B attached^ hereto. 4, The foregoing restrictions shall apply to and bind each and every owner of any part of the Property and wheir respective personal representatives, successors and^as and shall operate ae a covenant passing with the Property. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Long Lake and Orono have executed this Daclaration on the above dace. THE CITY wF ORONO Its Its THE ci:: OF lc“:g lake :t3 STATE OF MINNESOTA 8S . COONTT OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instranont waa ack-owledgec oefsra r.a _ _ day of_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _• i99i, hy this and tne and o: The City of Long Lake, a corporation, on behalf of the corporation N,'ctary Public STATE or MINNESOTA ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowlecged before me this dev of . 1991, by _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- - aay o - - - - - - of The City of Orono, a municipal corporation* on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED 3Y: LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY fc LINOGRSN, Ltd. 1500 Northwestern Financial Center 7900 Xerxc ^ Avenue South Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 (RHL) RWLsCIOa 2. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is encerea into betwe*=?n tne City of Lo Lake (Long Lake), a municipal corporation, located at 1964 Park Avenue, Long Lake, Minnesota 55356; and the City of Orono (Orono), a municipal corporation, located at P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323. RECITALS WHEREAS, on February 26, 1990, Long Lake filed with the Minnesota Municipal Board a patition for che concurrent detachment and annexation of certain real property, which is described in Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. into the City of Long Lake pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 414.061, Subd. 5, sL SSH•; ^nd WHEREAS, on March 28, 1990, Orono filed its response in opposition to the petition of Long Lake; and WHEREAS, the matter is presently pending before the Minnesota Municipal Board, and currently scheduled to resume trial on November 25, 1991; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to amicably resolve the petition of Long Lake without further litigation. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows; 1. Long Lake shall forthwith file an application for rezoning and subdivision approval of the subject property with Orono for the development of thirteen (13) lots as described in Exhibit B which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by re f erenr-o A? '^a ^ •- V-t:'» •»pplioor..;.-. for ^-rooni;.^ ji tne subject property, Lon<g Lake agrees to extend sewer and water to the subject property, which shall be chargeable against Long Lake's allocation for sewer and water units. 2.Upon filing of the application for rezoning and subdivision approval with Orono, Orono agrees that it will use its Dest efforts to expedxtiously process the applications. Additionally, upon receiving all appropriate filings from Long Lake as an applicant property owner for subdivision, rezoning and comprehensive plan amendment, Orono shall commence its required procedure to file an application with the Metropolitan Council to cunend the MUSA line and shall work with the Metropolitan Council to expeditiously process that application. Orono agrees to process all aspects of the rezoning and subdivision applications simultaneously with th processing of the application for amendment of the MUSA line with the Metropolitan Council. 3. This Agreement is expressly contingent upon the zoning approvals of Orono, and the approval of the amendments to the MUSA line by the Metropolitan Council, in a form that in the sole -judgment of Long Lake would permit the reasonable development of the thirteen fl31 lots on the subject property Upon the granting of the zoning approvals of Orono, and the approval of the amendments to the MUSA line by the Metropolitan Council Orono shall contemporaneously complete and execute the Declaration of Covenants contained in Exhibit C and forward it 2. • -r r i 4. to Long Lake for execution along with copies of the zoning .... ..w4...tr..4- L»w Lr.ci i-iric?. Long Lake determines in its sole judgment, that the zoning approvals of Orono, the approval of the amendments to the MUSA line by the Metropolitan Cou.cil, and the completed Declaration of Covenants would permit the reasonable development of the thirteen (13) lots on the subject property, Long Lake shall execute tne Declaration of Covenants and cause the same to be recorded and proof thereof forwarded to Orono. 4. Upon satisfaction of all conditions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, supra. and upon filing of the final plat, the parties shall cause to be executed and delivered to the Minnesota Municipal Board a Joint Resolution in the form attached as Exhibit D providing for the concurrent detachment and annexation of the subject property from Orono into Long Lake pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 414.0CI, subd. 5. 5. The parties agree that time is of the essence u.*. that each municipality binds itself to th-. covenant of good faith and fair dealing in taking all action that is reasonably necessary to effectuate the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Dated:c p Ll wt iCu THE CITY OF ORONO Its Mayor N / X ;fe Citv A ■7 Attorney 3. ATTEST: City Clerk Dated:I io III I THE CITY or LONG LAKE y Its MayT . C ^\AQAjCtx ^ Its City Atto:^y ATTEST : City Clerk CJD:QUls 4. i- JOINT RSSCLUTION CF THE CITIES C LCNG LAKE ANE Cr.GNO For the concurrent detach-T.ent and ar.nexacion of certain lands from the City of Crono and the annexation of the same to the City of Long Lake pursuant to Minn. Stat. S 414.061; and the stipulation of both municipa«ities that neither will support future annexations by either municipality pursuant to Minn. Stat. 5 414.061. RECIT.4LS WHEREAS > Long Lake has petitioned for the concurrent detach.ment and annexation of certain real property, described % in Exhibit A which incorporated herein by reference, into the City of Long Lake pursuant to Minn. Stan. S 414.061, Subd. 2, et seq. ; fcr.d WHEREAS, Orono has opposed the petition of long Lake; a.nc WHEREAS, the matter is presently pending beiore the Mlnnetnta Municipal Board, and currently scheduled to resume trial on November 25, 1991; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to amicably resolve the petition of Long Lake without further litigation allowing Long tQ assume jurisdiction and Orono to enforce certain covenants after annexation; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Cities of Long Lake and Orono do hereby resolve as follows: 1. • That certain real property situated in the State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin, which is legally described in Exhibit A, and to which Long Lake holds title in fee should be detached from the City of Orono and annexation to the City of Long Lake. uLil H 2.That the City Cour.cii for the City of Cror.o finds that the above-described property new located within the City of Orono abuta the City of Long Lake and ia subject tc concurrent detachn>.ent and annexation by concurrent resolutions of the two council of the two rrunicipaiities pursuant to Minn. Stat. S 414.061. 3. That city council of the City of Orcr.o agrees that the above-deecrlbed property should be concurrently detached from the City of Orono and annexed to the City of Long Lake. 4. That t.he city council of the City of Long Lake agrees that the above-described property shculd be concurrently detached from the City of Cror.o and annexed to the City of Long Lak«. S. That this resolution is being adopted concurrenu-y and jointly between the city council of the City of Orono ana the city council of the City of Long Lake, Hennepin County, Minnesota^ approving auch detachjnent and annexation as proviaed by law. s. That both the city council for the City of Cror.o and the City of ton, Leke requests the Minnesota Municipal Board to grant their request for the concurrent detachment and annexation of the above-described reel property to be effective upon issuance of the Board's order or at such later data as provided by the Board in its order. 7. That it is the desire of the City of Orono to eovenant that it will oppose from this day forth ths concurrent detachment pursuant to Minn. Stat. S 414.061 of any property 2. :1 presently Iccatec within the City of Long Lake and annexatinn of said property into Crone, and agrees that this covenant shall be specifically ei.:orceable against Creno by the City cr Long Lake in any proceedings before the Minnesota Munic^pai. Board, or any court of competent jurisdiction. 8.That it is the desire cf the City of Long Lake to covenant that it will oppose from this day forth the concurrent detachment pursuant to Minn. Stat. S 414.Ofl of any property presently located within the City of Crono and annexation of said property into Long Lake, a.nd agrees that this covenant shall be specifically enforceable against Long Lake by the City of Orono in any proceedings before the Minnesota Municipal Board, or any court of competent jurisdiction. 9. That both the city council for t.he City ot Orono and the City of Long Lake request that the Minnesota Municipal Board approve their covenants that neither will from this day forth eupport the concurrent detachment and annexation pursuant to Minn. Stat. S 414.061 of any property located within the juriedlction of the municipality, and that said covenant shall be epeclfically enforceable by either municipality in any proceedings before the Minnesota Municipal Board and any court of competent jurisdiction to be effective upon issuance of the Board's order or by the court upon the issuance of its order. 3. Passed by the City cf Crono this dey of 1991. Barbara Peterson, Mayor M'TEST: , Clerk passed by the City Council of the City of Long day of __ _ _ _ _ _ _' 1991. Lake this Betsy Swartwood, Mayor ATTEST: LaVerne Hanson, City Clerk CJD;QW03 Ihr,OfiCNO J0^ STATE Of T[t€ [i ^ J^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL R METRO WATERS, 1200 Warner Rd., St. Paul, PHONE NO. 772 ‘•7910 f lLl (? 1. David Squire September 12, 1991 McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 15050 23rd Avenue North Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 RE: ORCHARD POND PROPOSED PL/'^, WETLAND 2 7-836W, CITIES OF ORONO A.ND LONG LAKE, HENNEPIN COUNT7 Dear Mr. Squire; j )^3ve reviewed the proposed plat (and other documents attached to your August 26, 1991 letter) regarding the above-referenced project (SW 1/4, Sect. 35, T118N, R23W) and have the following comments to offer: The old sewage treatment site is DNR protected wetland /27-836W. (See attached copy of Protected Waters and Wetlands map). In addition, the creek from Long Lake is a DNR protected watercourse. Any activity below the ordinary high water (OHW) elevation, which alters the course, current or cross-section of protected waters or wetlands, is under the jurisdiction of the DNR and may require a DNR protected waters permit. It also appears that there are other wetlands on the site that would be subject to regulation by the U.S. Corps of Engineers (cor*’act Joe Yanta at 220-0362) and the city. The OHW for the creek is defined as the "top of the bank. No official OHW has been established for wetland 27-836W. Please contact this office if there is any question about whether proposed activities will be within protected wetland 27-836W and we can make arrangement to estimate or officially determine, if necessary, the OHW. Filling below the OHW (of DNR protected wetlands/waters) for upland development is prohibited. Filling below the OHW for public roadways can be permitted only if: 1) the public need rules out the no-build alternative, and 2) the alignment is the least impact alternative. It appears that the road proposed on the east side of the wetland will need to^elocated in order to avoid filling in wetland 27-836W. A significant portion of the site is within the 100 : -ar floodplain district (a copy of the appropriate portion of the Flood Insurance Rate Map is enclosed). Any activity within the floodplain would have to be consistent with the floodplain regulations of both the City of Orono (contact Jeanne Mabusth at 473-7357) and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (contact Ron Quanbeck at 473-4224). For example, the lowest floors of the structures would have to meet the minimum flood protection elevation, and compensatory storage may be required for any filling within the floodplain. 2. 3. AN EQUAL opportunity EMPLOYER Mr. Squire September 12, 1991 Page Two (2) 4. The area within 300 feet of the creek or in the lOO-year floodplain, whichever extends further, is subject to the City of Orono's shoreland management regulations. You should consult with the city regarding required setbacks, lot sizes, grading restrictions, etc. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9, As you've noted, there may be potential pollution from the abandoned sewage treatment facility. I would suggest contacting the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regarding the potential pollution. If construction involves dewatering in excess of 10,000 gallons per day or 1 million gallons per year, the contractor will need to obtain a DNR appropriations permit. You are advised that it typically takes approximately 60 days to process the permit application. Appropriate erosion control measures should be taken during the construction period. The Minnesota Construction Site Erosion and Sediment Control Planning Handbook (Board of Water & Soil Resources and Association of Metropolitan Soil and Water Conservation Districts) guidelines, or their equivalent, should be followed. There should be some type of easement, covenant or deed restriction for the properties adjacent to the wetland areas. This would help to ensure that property owners are aware that the DNR and the Corps of Engineers have jurisdiction over the areas and that the wetlands cannot be altered without appropriate permits. DNR protected wetland 27-836W should be labelled as such in future plans or plats and the OHW, if available, should be noted. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please contact me at 772-7910 should you have any questions regarding these comments. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please contact me at 772-7910 should you have questions. Sincerely, Ceil Strauss Area Hydrologist Enclosures cc: Jeanne Mabusth, City of Orono Ron Quanbeck, Minnehaha Creek WSD Wayne Barstad, Ecological Services MPCA City of Long Lake Joe Yanta, USCOE Orono shoreland file MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT P.0, SOI 3t7. Wmita. Minntsota 55391 Ufti HfRifTOMi Jy -.ofi -»»!• • M JW>tSows W»^«.«Ja»wLTtMrtas»^cnafoR Miw O.iiidaai«C.WMrewL0M> 0*1000 unow*naiasMaow. jr. rr September 30, Q2 £ ''OCT' 9 129! Mr. David Squire McCombs Frank Roos Associates. Inc. 15050 - 23rd Ave. No. Plymouth, MN 55441 Re: Development of Long Lake Wastewater Treatment Pltint Site Dear Mr. Squire: As we discussed, the District is concerned that the development of the site which contains the abandoned Long Lake Wastewater Treatment Plant and discharge pond be developed in an environmentally sound manner and in accordance with District rules. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has several concerns regarding this site. District rules require that the rate of stormwater ninofF from the site shall not increase as a result of the proposed development. Please note Rule B3(h) specifies that all stormwater rate control facilities shall be located above the projected lOU-year frequency flood elevation for the site. This criteria should be analyzed and met for runoff producing events of critical duration with return frequencies of I. 10 and 100 years. The project shall cause no net decrease in flood storage ccropacity below the projected 100*year frequency flood elevation. An analysis may be required to determine this elevation. In addition, alteration any protected water requires a permit from the District under Rule D • Wetland Alteration. Information received flom the DNR indicates that the on-site pond is a DNTi Protected Wetland. An additional significant concern with this development is that the large on-site pond served as the discharge pond for the Long Lake Sewage Treatment Plant. Sediments in ponds of this type often contain materials detrimental to water quality. The District is concenied that discharge from this site not cause degradation of the waters of the District Water quality information submitted for this project must include the effects of any proposed modifications to the site on Long Lake Creek including the analysis of the affect of potential sediment, suspended solids, nutrients such as phosphorus as well as other chemicals, metals and compounds. As we discussed, the information you have submitted to the District does not fully address these concerns. Some options which you may wish to consider include: eliminate discharge from the on-site pond, removal of sediments from the on-site pond to prevent their discharge, or chemically or physically binding sediments to prevent detrimental affects of their discharge. Mr. Danrid Squira Ptft Two SoptnborSO, 1S91 Thank you for this opportunity to comment on the project. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 473-4224. Sincerely, JAMES BC. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Engineers for the District Ronald S. Quanbeck ec: Board D. Jones rr •• department 0 T N A E S i DIVISION OF WA.ERT------------- It' 2 I £87 ii PROJECT AT/jmxM Lono Lk. > « Ki Henneoin 87-115 r^urtposc: suwvct Type; uevcls investigation X MOHW / OHW maintenance reconnaissance hydrographic work report rc t TH8 R23i in Metropolitan Long Lk. 1s j" 2j9*i“”s^nian1metere(i and’soi acres meandered. It 5J “as*2n“"ti^soil, Sid”(?n theVsw of Sec. 3S); southwesterly ..a Long Lk. Creek. On 6/26/87 the S“'^«7.^r®^.‘5‘^o5talJed°el^ the^outlet, downstream toinvestigation of the lake and control for the survey was from the *“j’’S9ton.|Jor«.rn^R.R^r.Aejj^ . ,;z.508. NGVO 1929. Following are the elevations we found at the outlet: >At 6’ X S' concrete box culvert thru old Hwy. 12" Water surface* Long Lk. (no outflow) KSSf (?r"po1nt on rocks across upstream . *"‘*.?!lt'at''reiMlns of possible old support for ^®the alleged metal plate across upstream end Upst4am*ln»«« of culvert K“orr.i«rl1h. of oPStream headw.ll ?r^ri«3"o2;si^e..h.adwall Downstream Invert Downstrcwn flownne Flowllne at end of apron End of apron -At 4* X 6' concrete box culvert thru new Hwy. 12 Stain on upstream wingwall Stain on upstream Top centerline upstream he^all 943.24 943.48 944.0 943.9 943.29 949.21 951.15 952.3 950.82 942.89 943.0 942.9 942.69 7/13/87 John 943.9 944.7 950.08 C/XlC SurVgv T I T «• E 0 A r C s I G R C Q 2T Upstream soffitt Upstream invert End of upstream apron Top centerline of downstream heacwaii Downstream invert End of downstream apron r • r 9^2.61 S49.55 941.95 941.93 'At 72" C?^P thru R.R. grade" Top upstream end (on bent lip) Upstream flowline Upstream Invert Stain on upstream end of culvert Top downstream end of culvert Downstream flowline Downstream invert 944.82 939.1 938.80 941.1 944.18 938.5 938.28 We also obtained the following elevations on the staff gage on the left upstream wingwall of the old Hwy. 12 culvert: Top 945.53 Too * 2.06 0^° of gage 943.47 During our OHW Investigation we boated tbe entire shoreline of We l«ke and obUlrad the ground, elevation at 8 trees (maple, ash, elm & oak). Based en the wingwall of the outlet culvert at 944.1 ^nd «45.w. \k4. ^ I Bonestroo M=M Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects OtTO G aone^TOC jos«y" C Arx3e^< Marv»n L Pfc P-t***!^ E ®E ••Vjrr'^J t '^CV^ ’E M CP* R^iir A jOT30n PE ffsc^^*T3 A «C5W* PE D ck 'jc J C 9o»T)J»rn PF j<r^f * 9oci»ont^ PE M«r% ^ M*r>vy P§ >3 » PE ’ 92JT^^'' Pf *cr«r'’ P pf ' jve 0 ^s«ct4 PF •-or'u A ‘Vrr»"w;^ ^F Vhc*'.- : PE p VJWKVJ P£ P A->je'W“ PE M-»ni ff %?#v *E woom C Cutset * ^ ’>on>j| E Angus Pf MOA^fQ A Siin^Wfl PP ' togrrcs *** * Ve*o P£ p^rtc ' w*»wr« PE v^jr* M^nrz PP S4^ r PE ® An<3en^ Gjrv p awrxJe* pJ •*^' a je^ien PE ^ p^Hftc *'» PF A 4 9f C A I A \jnn M ?»ng A iC P ;rTy O PMzscn PE C^»i»o Ofviet PE ffoC'e'T 9 D»rfo»cM, pF Gjr, X Mcxie^ PF ^ X P[ ^'T' « tX5C PE C**anps A EncAsor M P^WV^AS * M 0'Si?n October 8, 1991 CTTYCr • n L City of Orono Box 66 Cryst&l Bay,•^*1 ^ O ■tf ^’OCT 11 1991 Attention: Ms. Jeanne Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator Ret City of Long Lake Minnesota Orchard Pond Plat Wetland Delineation - Sept. 13., 1991 Dear Jeanne: I would like to summarize the findings of our September 13, 1991 wetland delineation of the Orchard Pond site, and discuss the environmental status of the wastewater treatment lagoon on the site. The wetland outline was delineated, based on consideration of soil, hydrology, vegetation, and topography. The outline of the wetland/upland transition wai staked by myself with input from Dave Squire, McCombs Frank Ross Associates, and Jeanne Mabusth, City of Orono. and subsequently surveyed by a crev from McCombs, Frank Roos Associates. A map of the wetland delineation is enclosed. The wetland soils are classified as a peaty muck (based on the Hennepin County Soil Survey (Pa - peaty muck)), and support vegetation that is dominated by reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinscea). Reed canary grass seemed to delineate the wetland area and ooldenrod a.nd other ester species characterized upland areas. The transition from voclami to upland sre&a was oiarked with a change in organic content o£ the soils. Wetland soils uere peaty (highly organic) and upland soils had more mineral content, with some sand found in the subsoil. In the wetland area, the water table was approximately 1<* inches below the surface while in the upland area, it was greater than 18 inches. The map of the topography of the wetland shows a gradient with a high point of 944.95 near the Orono Orchard Road, sloping to 940.15 near the Long Lake stream. A potential building site to the south of the stabilization pond was also reviewed. This site, which formerly was a wetland area, was filled with borrow material around the time of the pond construction in the 1960's. There are no strong Indicators now present that would characterize this area as a wetland area (based on hydrology and vegetation). The fill material at the site is a grey-brown sandy clay loam that is heavily mottled. This fill material probably was mottled when it was placed in this area. 210 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612*636-4600 • 35th Anniversary Also located on this plat is an abandoned waste water treatment lagoon (sometimes lagoons are also referred to as stabilization ponds). The lagoon has not received wastewater since the Long Lake interceptor came on-line in the early 1980's. Two soil borings were completed in the lagoon in February, 1905 to depths of 12 and 17 feet and two sediment samples from the lagoon were analyzed for organic and inorganic constituents in July. 1989. The soil boring results show black peat was the original bottc- material in the lagoon, indicating the lagoon probably was constructed without a clay liner. Cray sandy silt lies underneath the peat. The peat permability is slow enough that the lagoon will be wet in years with average rainfall. The water elevation in the lagoon was 941.99 on September 9, 1991, which is above the elevation of the adjacent Long Lake Stream. On our visit of September 13. 1991, water level in the lagoon was below the surface outlet structure for the lagoon. If water in the lagoon ever rises above the invert of the outlet structure, water will discharge to the Long Lake Stream. The result of the chemical analysis for the two sediment samples from the lagoon do not Indicate any problems with sediment contamination. Results are comparable if not better than what is found in some storm water detention basins. Results of testing for priority pollutant organic volatile, semivclatives, pesticides and PCBs showed aix determinations were below detection levels. Inorganic analysis (which includes heavy metals) indicated sediment concentration typical for lake and pond sediments in urban areas. I made several contacts at the MPCA to ask about potential problems with property transfer involving wastewater treatment lagoons. The contacts were* Mike Conley (297-1459), Property Transfer Group; John McQuire (296-8723), Municipal Permits Section; Doug Hall (297-1932), Industrial Permits Sections; and Dave Nelson (296-9274), Water Quality Group. This type of water body (a non~hazardous waste site, with no municipal, or industrial, or stormwater runoff entering, and a wastewater discharge permit that has been closed out) does not fit neatly into any single MPCA group. Basically, the MPCA does not require any further testing. It's my opinion, based on the non-industrial setting of the lagoon, and the fact that two soil samples do not show any unusual characteristics, (aluminum was elevated, but probably due to alum treatment) for typical stormwater detention ponds or wastewater lagoons that the likelihood of serious sediment contamination is small and no additional sampling is needed at this time. Jeanne, if there are any questions or a need for additional information please contact me. Sincerely, BCINESTROO. ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC.ICUIESTROO. Steven R. McComas SRM:lk cc: Glenn Co<v BRA David Sqi MFRA 210 r APPLICATION NO. 1691 CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 473-7357 NOTICE OP COONCIL ACTION 55323 Date of Notice; 11/13/91 TO:Betsy Swartwood, Mayor Mary Miller, CounciImember Samuel Hettinger, Counciliriember David Sawyer, CounciImember Scot Luse, CounciImember COPIES Jeff Roos McCombs Frank Roos Associates 15050 23rd Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55447 TTPB OF APPLICATIOH: Rezoning DATS OP .1.4:*TlliOj 11/12/91 VOTE 5 For 0 Against OOOBCIL ACTION - MOTION: To table any action on the zoning phase of Application #1691 and recommended delaying action until the comprehensive land use application is presented to the Council. The comprehensive land use application consists of a preliminary subdivision/comprehensive plan amendment (Application #1691) and a conditional use permit for a Planned Residential Development (Application #1702). The City of Long Lake's application for a Planned Residential Development is scheduled for review before the Planning Commission at their November 18, 1991 meeting scheduled for a 7:00 p.m. review. The application will be then scheduled before the Council at their November 25, 1991 meeting. The Council will be expected to review and act on the comprehensive land use application for the City of Long Lake at their November 25th meeting. Please contact Jeanne Mabusth if you have any questions pertaining to the Information provided in this not.ce. Isv ^^vX^.-'.-'S-'J ■ j<f • *% i^^orv^Lsk' r * N, 4< » 8ss^?^ ' ^ \ w ‘ '*^ -. .if (♦■■»"**% .^A-. > • *. •' ;*% •' 4i^-^.h.v - • • _»• ^.^. w r i *m 4. '^•-^ K >-Vi//^£j5ir^5ISrt#^'V^t]uN-. --^"f ■ . • •*’• -PIT T» tf ^ii4V.» -^-O* i iir?3t«3?<'-’ ' -i .v..‘..i > CORPORATE LIMITS .ZONE C Vi GME COniSULTAMTS, INC. consulting engineers 2232 Eds: Ze'-te-re V'■resc- s V\ 55--‘ 6*2 553 *959 r 11 «■ February 13, 1 3j McCombs-Knutson Associates, Inc. 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 Attention: Mr. Fred Malueg GME Job No. 743 RE:Preliminary subsurface exploration :or proposed residential street and subdivision construction at the existing waste water treatment lagoons in Long Lake, Minnesota Gentlemen: In accordance with the authorization given to ur by Mr. Fred Malueg, we have completed two soil borings for this projsct. Enclosed please find the soil boring logs and a report describing and interpreting these conditions. The borings were located in street areas based on the site plan submitted to us by MKA. The purpose of the borings was to obtain preliminary information on general soil conditions within the lagoon. Because of the existing fence around the facility and the unknown depth of ice and water on the lagoons, we elected to drill the borings with manual equipment. Our original intention was to obtain split barrel samples with a modified sampling method, using a standard split barrel sampler and an 09 pound hammer. However, when we encountered deep organic soils, we proceeded- to advance the borings and obtain samples by the auger method in accordance with ASTMi D 1452. In the two borings drilled, we encountered 1.5 to 4 feet of ice and sludge at the surface, overlying frozen sludge and non-frozen sludge to depths of about 3.5 feet. Unoerlying the sludge in all the borings, we encountered black to dark brown amorphus and fibrous peat to depths on the order of 12 to 17 feet. At these depths we encountered a black silty sand. Because of the need to use the manual equipment, we could not advance the borings below this depth. Based on the soil conditions found in the borings, construction of residential units in the area will require excavrtion/replacement or the use of deep foundatic such as driven tr.*’ted timber piles. As a preliminary est the depth of excavation would have to be at least 16 feet possibly deeper, depending on variations in *he depth of t* .game soils across the site. GEOTECHNICAL • MATERIALS • ENVIRONMENTAL SOILS WtLUAM C KWASNY. P E THOMAS P VENEMA P E WILLIAM E B lOEMENOAL E I T i'' r- Mr. Fred Malueg February 13, 1985 Residential streets could possibly be constructed using a surcharge method whereby the peat would be preloaded to increase the unit stress on the compressible soils to a level greater than that anticipated during the life of the pavement. This would require placing fill to thicknesses on the order of 5 feet above the estimated f* ished grade, for a period of 6 months to a year. With this method it would not be adviseable to construct underground utilities under the embankment fill due to long term secondary consolidation of the peat, which would result in additional settlement. If you have any questions regarding this report or if we can be of further assistance to you, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely GMEXONSULTANTS, INC. William C. Kwas^, P. Principal Engiiwr Enclosures:Soil Boring Location Diagr^un General Notes Soil Boring Logs Unified Soil Classification Chart WCK:kdk COSiWtTMiTt. IM. f • C\ k1^- #• ^ V >-■ T‘‘ I- < A • r r-' kw d'-' • 1^' p;' f^' £■" % i: V \- . '\ ci • ^6l ^sL/V'-Vl.: ; ■.. -i.-.a----L , .'- - a:, 1 f|s^ V- I-f ? V ■■ ^v- . tp' <H.'IsJ. •i':-ti ■s% iis*M'Ir l^' V: Y\ ly- ^11 Si OENfjULNQIii aWILLWIQ 4«Ail»LlliO SVWOUS tm»y - y O J).. wH— Otfwrwiw wottd MlC-liX:»X:AX At t Ji : Vt : V«M •' OS MS WS PT At •S PM 0*Mf«wf - 3" Shalbv Tu(m HoIIm St«ffi A«*fir Wiiti fiihTr^U AocA Sit SuNrS^ff^ friMurinuttr mt • M Stu SiQM p«r loot of • 140 oound hammor fallino 30 incAot oo • 2 ioch 00 W>ot*. taciot WATlt ilVtL MgASUWlMfNTSVMtOtS WMItOHMiAt ■MWIIWM — bOTHw tea «•« Mm tv*«M nwMuatf ♦« Mm bonnt M Mm «w*Mt MiMtejMd. In pwvtoyt ^It. Mm •tUaWt frewnM wtltf 4«v«lt. In impaviam toil*, Mm KCuraM d«w»MMn«non in iMr SaMt iMW Mwra Mmm S0% of Mmiv dry fWtaMMd on • 4^200 Maa; MMyoM mtmt. MI«tOromidSoM«iiawoloMMMnSO%of MMirMrv«Mitltt««tt.''tMono #21200«irM:MMV __ _ . . M Mwy OM cotMiiOT. atM Mtn II Mmv a* non«o»MMa In aMdition to roMttion. tfilinat on'iiilo’tiaMO# MMlf roloMyt in«lK« ManMty ond lino vranod Mil* “w MM bools of MmM tt>a«rli or OwCTipMoo Tormlit lOI CompotMntt Alto Ntcontol OlSawdM tIaoSofifi ffowit in Somplo)Dry ISOffNt •adda.0«a 0 in. |200iiMii|Tract 1-9 CobMM S in. to 3 In. |200mnito TSnwnl LiiMa 10- 19 OfOMi '3 a. to 4^4 Mara ITtoan to 2nwnt SonM 30-34 SooS #4to#300aiovf |2Mon to j074mml And 39-90 tIH cm NBint#300dooa nj074mm to OOOSnwnI SntollathonOjOOSntwi MOLATIVI HtMtlTY OP BWANULAW SOILS: H - Mowo/lt. <0tt •Jt'OAi ttO-IJt 3jOO-3Ji dtt'tJOO >tJOO VotySofi toH Modhim (Fbfii) t«H Vav Still Hard Vary Hard e-3 4.f 10~3t 30-dM M-tO •0*- Artawo Oonsitv VoryLi iotfOMMly Oaioa GMB CONSUUrANTS, ZHC. ^9'mojECT Proposed Subdivision S»T£Treatment Plant Long Lake. Minnesota •0’aOWNERARCHITECT-6NOINCER McCombs * Knutson Associates. Inc. 1 1 iI i llIf 1 —IHA — EUS^im. r— description op material SURPACE ELEVATION, 1* Ice and sludoe Sandy sludge frozen to 2.5* Black peat* amorphous to fibrous - (Pt) Gray sandy silt and silty fine sand - wet - (SM) End of boring at 12 feet Hand augered full depth Err« G feet after boring ftud aS !S ! GME CONSULTANTS. INC EMTCE! UNCONTtNCO COMPfICSSrvC ST^CNOTH -O- 1 ♦2 3 S -t- WATER CONTENT % STANOAffO RENETHATION IBLOWS/POOT) 10 20 30 40 50 BQRINQ STARTED BORINQC 2^ DRAWN JOBL 743 APPR HCK SHEET 2 Of^ Th« iiiRilflcation Him iRpiwwv EppiwiimEN boundirtw a<Nwn •oH typo: inWtu Vw timWon imy bt gndtj«i. aMERRC>imH UNIPIBO BOIl.■ IFICATION aYaTaM t I Witf niMiMi. Into «r M* Am '-■el;'-*’“*’ I fi_i 1 jnirn JT yifc-*" iwMlaianatr'r^ I Anaftiii toiiia>ttoi»"A* ■WWlJ.lMllMlO Mfgm *A7 ■» «M0 03.1 1}^ %«.»«M,-„l..-.inii >•>»» I AiaiawO HmtoiMMw*A*’ ■N»«rl.l.toaOM»« yS AaJSiManJ maWm «to •» AtoH»«»l Aiwtowf Oiiliiitoaa "A* wWi IJ. 3 — Att«fto«ff U*H* a*g**"f*J ‘ rd 0 10 30 30 ■j- C’l , ■ 'L V *.•' .'O*' ■•. L WWMEMORANDUM TO: Long Lake C^ty Council nOM: J«ff Roos» City Engineer DATE: August It 1989 Pace Laboratories has coapleted the analysis of the two soil sa"«ples taksB froa the abandoned lagoon at the Wastewater Treatment Plant : Tha soils ware tested for cyanldSt the thirteen (13) aetals on the ’pixorlty pollutant** llstt thirty (30) **prlorlty pollutant volatiles* fifty eight (58) "priority pollutant" ssnlvolatlles, and twenty four (24) pcstlclde/PCB aatsrials. Of tbs 126 tests run* there were 118 In %rhlch no detections were ragiatarad* Tha sight which did register detections fell within the common range for these slsnsnts in normal soils. Tha only elanant which was noted to have an unusually high concentration was aluminuB. It probably is the result of using alum in the treatment process. Aluminum is not a priority pollutant. /I ■ w ^ - *•* a k Associates» Inc, Norti) S5441 July 31, 1989 PfCE Project NUnbec: 890719511 Barron t) Collected: 07/19/89 •) Rsoalved: 07/19/89 Units MDL [MJSXS VIMHETi^ sal vq/kg 0.50 4HIMfI list MEIALS'^AA *• i 1 f V W- . ' .1 • , t . .0 • S- f • ?. . : I ■ i t - - 3 agAg mg/kg ■g/kg ■g/kg ■g/kg ■g/kg 10 1.3 1.0 0.25 2.5 _ 0.25 c ■- •’1 . I • J ^ . \ * T ^ ng/kg ■gAg ■sAg ■g/kg ■g/kg ■gAg 2.5 0.02 1.3 3.1 4.0 10 i I ,. ' .c ■gAg 2.5 f£E£ U0XM 0RSMHC VOLKTILBS la laocowthane ■gAg ■gAg ■gAg K^g •g/kg 6.2 3.1 1.2 0.6 0.6 t detscted at or above the (kind Detection Unit IL. aa aubjaet to final review. 243510 South Boring 243520 north Boring 12 « 1.6 # HD 4 0.58 8.0 8.5_ 12 « 2.8 f ND I 0.85 8.5 _ 15 15 ♦ NO 14 HD 4 MD 13 « ND 19, ND MD 4 HD ND MD ND HD ‘ACE l ABO^ptories . INC. TUTHo 612' 5JU T?T4 ;u 1 31 . 89 16 : 19 P . 01 f Wr. itn tenon Bt9» S '^uly 31, 1989 PACH Project Nmrber; 8907195H MQ SMpIe Number: Units PWSMgC Awgisis organics PfiSTiao5/PCB0ns 9-iuc tfmc (Lindane) Atedane KpUcUor ^1221 ^1232 ^1242 ••1248 VQXide fc 1254 1260 aq/kg ng/kq "9/kg mg/kg ng/kg ng/kg «bove the mdl. Method Detection Limit 243510 South WDL Boring 33 33 33 33 33 83 ND ND MD ND ND ND 243520 North Boring mg/kg 1.6 ND NT)mg/kg 1.0 ND MDmgAg33NDMDmg/kg 1.0 ND ND»i^g 1.2 ND NDmg/kg 2.0 ND ND mgAg 1.2 ND NT)mgAg 2.0 ND *311/ ND■gAg 6.6 ND Hi/ MDmg/kg 2.3 ND nu NDmgAg1.0 ND fit/ NDmgAg1.3 ND Hi/ ND mgAg 1.0 ND MT>mg/kg 33 ND Wv NDmg/kg 33 ND Mn ND ND ND ND ND ND itrypfijOg^flro'^igr. inc: nccbofolDnes T el nc7 Client___ '6i: 5w4 :7:j . '51 .>'lo-lO .uI Project Subject Sbeet No. Date. — Project No. ILl^ REPORT OF laboratory ANALYSIS loDOtotories. rc Offices: Minneapolis. Minnesota Tampa, Florida | Coralville. Iowa Novato. California Leawood. Kansas }$ota, August 02. 1989 Mr. Tom Barron McCombs Frank Roos /Associates, Inc. 15050 23rd Avenue North Plymouth. MN 55441 Dear Mr. Barron; Enclosed Is the report of laboratory analyses for samples received 07/19/09. If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, Susan 0. Max Director, Sampling and Analytical Services Enclosures 1710 Douglas Drive North c Minneapolis. MN 5S422 - Phone (612) 544-5543 ecjua^ opooffu/iify employer oSo^)nes, REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc 15050 23rd Avenue Nor^h Plymouth, MN 55441 Attn: Mr. Tom Barron 07/19/89 07/19/89 Longlake Date Sample(s) Collected: Oat# Sample(s) Received: PACE Sample Number: ParaaeUr TwnprjiiiTr, analysis INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS Cyanide. Total PRIORITY POLLUTANT LIST METALS-FAA Antimony Arsenic Beryllium Cadmlurn Chromiurn Copper Lead Mercury Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Zinc npnAWTr anai PRIORITY POLLUTANT ORGANIC VOLATILES Acrolein Acrylonitrile Diehlorod1f1uorome thane Benzene Bromod1chIoromethane Bromoform August 02, 1989 PACE Project Number Minn .apolis. Minnesota Tampa, Florida Coralville. Iowa Novato, California Leawood. Kansas 890719511 t mg/kg mg .'kg mg / k g mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg MDI 243510 South Rnr t ng 0.50 10 1.3 1 .0 0.25 2.5 0.25 2.5 0.02 1.3 3.1 4.0 10 NO 12 1.6 NO 0.58 8.0 8.5 15 NO 14 NO NO NO 243520 North Rnr1ng ND C1 2.8 ND 0.85 8.5 15 13 ND 19 iO ND ND mg/kg 2,5 30 42 mg/kg 6.2 NO ND mg/kg 3.1 ND ND mg/kg 1.2 NO ND mg/kg 0.6 ND ND mg/kg 0.6 NO ND mg/kg 0.6 ND ND ND MOL Not detected at or above the MOL Method Detection Limit 1710 Douglas Drive North = Minneapolis. MN 55422 - Phono (612) 544-5543 an eQuai opportunity employer |>OCS. bborotones Mr. Tom Barron Page 2 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS ^ • i ( W w O August 02. 1989 PACE Prelect Numbe*' Minneapolis. Minnesota Tampa, Florida Coralville, Iowa Novato. California Leawood. Kansas 890719511 PACE Sample Number: Paramatpr npHANir anaiy<;t<; PRIORITY POLLUTANT ORGANIC VOLATILES Bromomethane Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether Chloroform Chloromethane Olbromochloromethane 1.1- 01chloroethane 1.2- D1chloroethane 1,l~Otchloroethylene Trans-1,2-dlchloroethylet.i: 1.2- 01 chioropropane 1.3- Otchioropropane Ethyl benzene Methylene chloride 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethanc Tetrachloroethylene Toluene 1.1.1- Trl * ^oroethai.w 1.1.2- Tr1chloroethane Trichloroethylene Trichlorofluoromethane Vinyl chloride PRIORITY POLLUTANT ORGANIC SEMIVOLATILES Benzidine b1s(chloromethyl)Ether 1.2- 01phenylhydraz1ne n-NItrosodImethylamine Phenol llnl t<;MDl 243510 South Rnr1 no 24 No F'- mg/kg 1.2 NO ND mg/kg 0.6 NO ND mg/kg 0.6 NO ND mg/kg 1.2 NO ND mg/kg 1 .2 ND ND mg/kg 0.6 NO ND mg/kg 1 .2 ND NO mg/kg 0.6 ND NO mg/kg 0.6 ND ND mg/kg O.S ND ND mg/kg O.t ND ND mg/kg 0.6 ND ND mg/kg 0.6 ND ND mg/kg 1.2 ND ND mg/kg 0.6 ND ND mg/kg 0.6 ND NO mg/kg 0 6 ND ND mg/kg 0.6 ND ND mg/kg 0.6 ND ND mg/kg 0.6 ND NO mg/kg 0.6 ND ND mg/kg 0.6 ND ND mg/kg 1.2 ND ND mg/kg 1.2 ND ND ug/kg 3200 ND ND ug/kg 170 ND ND ug/kg 140 ND NO ug/kg 74 ND ND ug/kg 68 ND ND NO MOL Not detected at or above the MOL. Method Oetectlon Limit 1710 Douglas Drive Norih z Minneapolis, MN 5S422 - Phone (612) 544-5543 an eQu3t opportunity efnp'Oyer Micelaboratories. Mr. Tom Barron Page 3 report of laboratory analysis August 02, 1989 PACE P»eject Number Minneapolis. Minnesota Tampa. Florida Coralvi'le. Iowa Novato. California Leawood. Kansas f 890/1951 1 asoia4 PACE Sample Number: P;iram»ter gpr.AMTr ANAiyr;T<t PRIORITY POLLUTANT ORGANIC SEMIVCLATILES b1s(2-Chloroethy 1)Ether 2-Chloropheno1 \ ,3-DIchlorobenzene 1.4- 01 chlorobenzene 1,2-D1chlorobenzene bis(2-Chloro1sopropyl)Ether n-NItrosodl-n-propy1 amine Hexachloroethane Nitrobenzene Isophorone 2-N1trophenol 2.4- 01methylphenol b1s(2-chloroethoxy)Methane 2.4- 01chloropheno1 1.2.4- Trichlorobenzene Naphthalene Hexachlorobutadlene 4-Chloro-3-methy1 phenol Hexachlorocyclopentadlene 2.4.6- Trlchlorophenol 2-Chloronaphtha1ene Dimethyl phthalate Acenaphthylene 2.6- 01n1trotoluent Acenaphthene 2.4- 01nitro?henol 4-N1trophenol 2.4- 01n1trotoluene Diethyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Units 243510 South Rnr1ng 243520 North Rnr1 nr ug/Kg 9’ND ND ug/Kg 130 ND ND ug/Kg 65 ND ND ug/kg /O ND ND ug/Kg 68 ND ND ug/Kg 91 ND ND ug/Kg 80 NO ND ug.'Kg 56 ND ND ug/Kg no ND ND ug/kg 120 ND ND ug/kg 230 NO ND ug/kg 160 ND ND ug/kg 150 NO ND ug/kg 180 ND NO ug/kg 91 ND NO ug/kg 91 ND ND ug/kg 83 ND ND ug/kg 160 ND ND ug/kg 120 ND ND ug/kg 150 ND ND ug/kg 91 ND ND ug/kg 65 ND ND ug/kg 75 ND ND ug/kg 91 ND ND ug/kg 81 ND ND ug/kg 50 ND ND ug/kg 51 NO ND ug/kg 75 ND ND ug/kg 120 ND ND ug/kg 100 NO ND ND HDL Not detected at or above the MOL Method Detection Limit 1710 Douglas Drive North = Minneapolis. MN 55422 - Phone (612) 544-5543 30 opportunity employe' 0OC8.bborotc 'es, Mr. Tom Perron Page 4 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS August 02. 1989 PACE Project Numbe Minneapolis, Minnesota Tampa. Florida Coratville. Iowa Novato. California Leawood. Kansas 890719511 f PAC.'I Sample Number: Paraiworpr npr.ANTr anaiy<:t<; PRIORITY POLLUTANT ORGANIC SEMIVOLATILES Fluorene 2-Methyl-4,6-dln1trophenol n-NItrosodlphenylamine 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Hexachlorobenzene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene 01-n-butyl phthalate Fluoranthene Pyrene Butyl benzyl phthalate 3,3-D1chlorobenz1d1ne Benzo<a)anthracene b1s(2-ethylhexyl)Phthalate Chrysene Dl.n-octyl phthalate Benzo<b)fl'ioranthene Benzo(k)f1uoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indenod ,2,3-c,d)pyrene 01benzo<a,h)anthracene Benzo(g,h,1)pery1ene GCMS SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS PESTICIDE/PCB Aldrin a-BHC b-BHC d-BHC g-BHC (Lindane) Chlordane llnl Mni 243510 South Rnr1ng 243520 North Rnr1ng ug/Kg 81 NO ND ug/kg 180 NO NO ug/kg 120 NO NO ug/kg 120 NO ND ug/kg 120 NO ND ug/kg 930 NO ND ug/kg 100 NO ND ug/kg 100 NO ND ug/kg 100 NO ND ug/kg 91 NO ND ug/kg 180 NO ND ug/kg 180 NO ND ug/kg 180 NO ND ug/kg 180 ND ND ug/kg 300 NO ND ug/kg 200 ND ND ug/kg 160 ND ND ug/kg 170 N>"ND ug/kg 580 ND ND ug/kg 180 ND NO ug/kg 160 ND ug/kg 66 ND ND ug/kg 160 ND NO mg/kg 1.2 ND NO mg/kg 1.5 ND NO mg/kg 2.0 ND NO mg/kg 1.6 ND ND mg/kg 1.0 ND NO mg/kg 33 ND NO NO MOL Not detected at or above the MDL Method Detection Limit 1710 Douglas Drive North ~ Minneapo'is. MN 55422 - Phone (612) 544-5543 a/T equa^ cppc tuntfy employer .Tabofotones, Mr. Tom Barron Page 5 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS iilv. August 02. 1989 PACE Project Numocr Minneapolis, Minnesota Tampa, Florida Coralville, Iowa Novato California Leawooa Kansas 890719511 PACE Sample Number: Parameter nerjtNTr anaiy<;t<; GCMS SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS PESTICIDE/PCB 4.4'-000 4,4’-00E 4,4’-0DT Dieldrin Endosulfan I Endosulfan II Endosulfan sulfate Endrln Hfptachlor Neptachlor epoxide PCB-1016 PCB-1221 PCB-1232 PCB-1242 PCB-1248 PCB-1254 PCB-1260 Toxaphene Uni ND MOL Not detected at or above the MDL Method Detection Limit MDL 243510 South Rnr\ng 243520 North Rnr1ng mg/kg 1.0 ND ND mg/kg 1.2 NO NO mg/kg 2.0 ND ND mg/kg 1.2 ND ND mg/kg 2.0 ND ND mg/kg 6.6 ND ND mg/kg 2.3 ND ND mg/kg 1.0 ND ND mg/kg 1.3 ND NO mg/kg 1.0 ND ND ■ 3/i^g 33 ND ND mg/kg 33 ND NO mg/kg 33 ND NO mg/kg 33 ND ND mg/kg 33 ND NO mg/kg 33 ND ND mg/kg 33 ND ND mg/kg 83 ND ND 1710 Douglas Drive North = Minneapolis. MN 55422 - Phone (612) 544-5543 an eQuai oppo tunity pott.hborotories. Mr. Tom Barron Page 6 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS r«: August 02. 1989 Pace Project Number Minneapolis, Minnesota Tampa. Florida Coraivtile, Iowa Novato. California i|/ Leawood. Kansas 890719511 The data contained In this report were obtained using EPA or other approved methodologies. All analyses were performed by me or under my direct supervision. Thomas L. Halverson Inorganic Chemistry Manager A Dennis R. Seeger Organic Chemistry Manager 1710 Douglas Drive North c Minneapolis. MN 5S422 - Phone (612) 544-5543 art eQuBi empioyef w• m Mu SA VP. f ('f SCO p ’ ON T<VE MATRIX PAC( NO E]H I « S s RAiLf OS SMiPMf NT Ml TWOO I Tf M OUT/OATI Rl rUBSIO/DATt N\JM(I(R PfUNQUISHtO BY / AT^iliaTioN ACCCPTID BY / ArnuATiON'mmm n IKftt g ffioimon Of M^n^sts supvitcg i-: .“4ar ; ro«4). ••ith thm •••t Un« ot s«id Ck>v#rn^nt Lot 3i th#nc* •«wth«rly *»N**i«tft2i U immt If. 52 9haln«) nofth of th# •outh%^««t corner of fOKl Oovoroaoot Lot 2, •hlch point i« tho tntorooction of %hm oouthorlf rl^fct-of-»oy 0^14 r«ilf*.4 -Ith Mid -.e IIM. ^-"C. 4t« U f*«t <7.ja chain#I: thane# »owth to • point on tho oouth IIM of ••'<» Co*or«^nt ^t J Sta 470.•! foot 17.27 Choin*. .! 1ir•oott cornor thoroof i thonco ooot oo ootd io«ih lir,* to tho ooothooot cornor thoroof i an tho ooot lino Of oold C«»orT(*ont U>t ? to it» tho horthorlv r^ht-of-oy Imo ^ MiTroilroodi thonco —\-ain northorly fi»ht-ol--oy U"o of ild roilroM, *130 tMCtrt that part thoroof ^***Coo»oncli»< at tho intortaction of tho •o^l»^- orly rioht-of-ooy Uno of tho . Northorn hoilrood with tho *••* “"* ^ GooorfMBont U»t I: thooco ooatorly aloof Mid aouthorly rifht-of-ooy Uno a ditta^o of 7i foot to tho point of bofinmnf of tho prop- orty ho*i*f dooctibod: thonco eontioaiof oaotorly olonf ooid •ouihorly Uiio o dlotooco of i4d toot, thf rifht *0 «ofrooo a dlotaneo of 744 foot, thonco dofloctiof rifht 44 dofrooo a diai- anoo of 170.70 faot: thooco dofloctlhf rifht to tho point of bOflhhlhf hLiO That port of soooro—^ Uot J- iiA 23a 4#»crllMd mm foiIov«z ®t • point on tho iouth lino of 23i?Si2t lot "diotMt JI7.tl foot loot of thO •Mthooot cenwr thoroof, thonco Boot olonf maid SttlTTtl. ?tTod foot, thonco dofloctlno loft 2t4.50 foot Oh a lino ohlch if latorooci tho ooothoily l^ocho terlliMtoo oorthorn Mil road (foroorly tno cttorlUthorn Milwoy and tha dt. Mol. ^nno- AMlio oo4 i^itote Milroo4J ot • tfiotooco of 4§4 32 Coot OOOtOTl Y I OOOOUfO^ oioo^ Mid rio^'t- lltli thi -oot lino of Mid covorn- ^ a. tttOfO oouthoootorly to tho point s3T£s.TJs.i:: snrti:.':: -*;?- • Ts5 sL:.rs s.-2.ssu ‘s.;;-“5 .. o4 tho oootoooot ootoot ofOOt OOoOO CWOftOf ■M^tOOtJlOMt Ooortof of tho lOOtiMOOt ooortor . thonco oofth to tM notthooot cocoor of ooid itii-----wood do tho horthwoot cornor of hold Mothowt 0oo««or of tho •«'**»**^* ^•***‘!*Li. _ iHooTooMiroloof tM -ott lino of 0O4d dooth- •Mt Onortoo od tho •dJ.M foot |7».ld cMino* horth #1 ziit cooMT o« to»d 2-1?:!,:'O oot tot ! thoooo oooOhoootot 1 y oioo^i tho ooooofliM of Orooo Orcoord Aood ilotoofiy tho ooo»o^^ ^ ^ tjt iMt hoftn. ymXj oioot ooid oootoolino ffoo Tm Jlmlm oootn lino ^ ooid mm ooooiMOoooolf •••• •• o^ooo Q 1 too 0O«r mrmrnw thoon mf bohod xpon Mh dotM ■11 1 cS-tj ''OCT 1 8 1991 r Edmant: A’, F, Rydell 155 C)ron>) Orcharo R<.Md Long Lake, MN 55 55c> October 17. I'J'H Orono Planning Commission Chairman ancj Member ^ City of Orono P. O, BOx 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Chairman and Members, I have expressed my opposition to the development of the se\i.er property land which is lacross the street from my residence on many occasions. However, I came to realize that requiring Long Lake to accept the zoning requirements which all the rest of us are bound by would be the best solution we could get, and I reluctantly accepted this concept. It was my understanding that in order to comply with the two acre require ment, they would be able to get a maximum of 13 lots on the property. 1 am now advised that when the actual application. No. lo91, is up for approval, Long Lake wants the 13 lots but to do so they will have to violate theZ acre requirement; therefore they are requesting re oning to one acreR>l\. I am strongly opposed to this. They should be hela to the 2 acre requirement, and that should determine how many lots they can get. Dear members, I own 38 acres just across the street from the sewer property. At some point I or my heir may want to subdivide. 1 have always appreciated our 2 acre requirement and been bound by it in my planning. Because of a large amount of wetlands, I can only get about 6 or 7 lots out of my property. I love our open spaces concept and have never regretted this constraint. However, if Long Lake is permitted to rezone to one acre, there is no valid reason why I and others should not be permitted to do so. The value of my land would be almost double if this were permitted. There is no reason why Long Lake should be treated any differently than an individual. It seems to me if we make an exception in this case, we are opening a Pandora's box of problems. I don t think I would want to, but there are no doubt many landowners who would like to double their money on their land. They may bring lawsuits. The argument that an individual should be afforded the same treatment as any other type of legal owner may be powerful. We may be precipitating the ultimate downfal' if our whole 2 acre concept if this 1 acre rezoning is granted. Even >f we prevail, we may be su)ected to long and expensive lawsuits which we can ill ati«.. 1 strongly urge that you reject the proposed 1 acre re zoning of the sewer plant land. Sincerely, r Or«g and Dana Kellenberger 105 Orono Orchard Road Long Lake, MN 55356 TO: City of Orono Planning Commission RE Application #1691 - The City of Long Lake s comprehensive land use application for 13 lot residential subdivision of the properly located at 130 Orono Orchard Road Members of the Planning Commission We are wrriting this letter in lieu of attending the meeting scheduled for October 21 st we will be out of town on that date After reviewing the plans on site with Jeanne Mabuath and David Squire on October 15.1991 . and then again at the Orono City offices on October 17.1991 ; we would like to make the following comments: 1) Overall aHe plan: We are happy to see that the three most important features of the site • the portd the stand of mature spruce, and the large hill - are being preserved. These features give the site its unique character and should therefore be saved and accentuated. 2) Road alignment: In general, it makes sense to follow the existing gravel road because it helps preserve the features mentioned above. That alignment gives good access to the land to the north of the railroad tracks and minimizes construction in the sensitive areas of the site, however; the intersection with Orono Orchard Road is less than desirable The plan shows this proposed intersection in a direct line of sight with our house. That means that the headlights of any cars traveling out of this neighborhood at night will shine directly into the windows of our living and family rooms. This proposed intersection also duplicates the one immediolely to the south. A better solution would be to curve the proposed road to the south from the edge of the pond and align it to intersect with Orono Oaks Road. This would provide a better entrance to the proiect (by creating a view toward the porvJ as you drive in) arxl eliminate an additions entry onto Orono Orchard Road ------------- r 3) Project density and lot size: At first glance. 13 - one acre lots seems to be an acceptable solution compared to the previous plans that we ve seen (i e leveling oft the hiii and filling In the pond); however, a closer look warrants these comments a) To build the two houses in the positions shown on the east side of Orono Orchard Road across from Orchard Drive would certainly have an adverse effect on the stream and lowlands included m these lots. Even one house would be questionable on tms site due to the size of the existing knoll it would be built on and because of the driveway alignment to Orono Orchard Road b) Two questions: Does the 2 - acre minimum lot size apply to this parcel of land? H so. would we be setting a (negative) precedent for future developments in Orono by allowing these smaller lot sizes Additional comments and questions: a) Lots of people walk and bike along Orono Orchard Road on their way to the Luce Line Bike Trail. The sharp corner in Orono Orchard Road (where it crosses the stream) is a particularly dangerous meeting place for pedestrians and automobiles This could be changed by adding a pathway along the east side of Ororo Orchard Road beginning at Orono Oaks Drive and continuing north to Orchard Circle (or further to Bollum Lane) The stream could be crossed with a bridge (on the inside corner of the curvet to create a pleasing and safe link to the Luce Line b) It’s my understandir^ that the proposed road widths in this development are 30 feet curb to curb. These road widths are excessive because very few cars are parked on the street due to the driveway lengths encouraged by a 35' setback I would urge you to recommend narrower street widths (approx. 24 ) to help preserve more land. c) What is the size of the acreage (and potential developed density) to the north of the Burlington Railroad that will be accessed by this development? d) 1‘ve left this comment for last because I’m almost afraid to mention it But what the heck? I find it amazing that the City of Long Uke » proposing this developmerw and the south by-pass route for Highway 12 in the same breath Who would be motivated to ouy a house in this development with a freeway or expressway m their backyards? Thankyou all for reading this somewhat longwinded letter I want you to know tnat we are rtol against a residential development on this site - we request only that t be done in a manner consistent with Orono's high startdards We urge the members or the planning commission to tiAHe this project until it complies with those standards Sincerely. / ;■o i O f LL MORTM — — — — W&TUAMD I.IMIT4* (A* OSTBVMiMSD Id CL-K.VATI£>M4> «4i.^f O lOO 200 PT :3flfcM» Jli£uZ AmmMMsIm. rMAM m «ft#4 W6TL/kVID L-lMiTS ORCMARD POND ADD r*%. ■ k ■ r f. t I/. ■ I* ¥ l I- I: f I 1^'.r m M Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk & Associates OOD O SonwwaQ PE »0Cf*t W tnm PE Joseph C Anaem, PE M^«n I. V>V4U PE •cnjuJ £ njfrier P£ Glenn ft Coo*. PE Thomss E Noy«. PE CoOc^ G Sc^unc^r f*€ SuS4n M £l)e^r> C P ^ Engineers A Architects Ketr A Gofoon PE ftchjfO w Poser PE OonM] C BtpgeeJi P£ A Soiytjon PE Marti A H«nyy> PE ><j «c P«p<d PE Mcnee» ^ Rjutmar^n P£ Softer ft p^n**'^ PE Oevxj O iDMoAJ PE W PE Mcf»je< C P£ jjrrm ft Mjtend PE P Andf*vx> PE Marti ft IdPl P£ ftcoert C ftLiije*i a ia rnomas E Ar^i PE Movw^ A Sanibrt} P£ Osrief J EJgernv^ P£ Mari A S«x PE Philip J Casviee P£ iimaei Martinei PE Mart O V' 'P Thorrtas ‘ a i a Gary f ftyiar>oe« PE Min • Jenwtn PE C PrtAip Gr».m. PE •pne C Mumart AiA Agnn M ftir>g AiCP >erry U PpriBCh PE Ceaiio Ovipr PE Aooert ft Orebiopf p£ Gary .V Monen PE Pjnen L vViemen PE i<nch ft Yipa PE Chann A Enckion Leo M P»e«turv Njrtao M Onor 9 November 5, 1991 council meetimq eaS”City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 UllSEtlO BONO Attention: John Gerhardson NOV. 8 1991 Re:City of Orono Lift Station No. 11 Renovation Our File No. 13959 Dear Mr. Gerhardson: Attached is Pay Request No. 1 for Lift Station No. 11 Renovation. I have attached Northwest Mechanicals breakdown for your records. We recommend the City accept this pay request and pay the contractor the due amount If you have any questions please call. Yours very truly. BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Dar^ Kirschenman DK:lk Enclosure 2S3S Wtat Mighiwy SA • St. PmA, MNwesota SSI13 • 412-A3A4400 • 3Sth Anniversary ll/06/199i 09:27 -.^^rtbwest l^MecbanJcal \/jic. pinuo ?ks /nortkjest mech NVOICE 612 4766815 P.01 To: 's i''-. PO. Box 40 Long Uko, MN 55356 (612) 473^101 2335*We^t ^ Associates St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 Data October 31, 1991 P.O. No. Attention: Daryl Kirschenman Job No. 1529-1 Invoice/ Net due 10 days rouS mfT l39» Billing 01 From start of project to now. CONTRACT WORK COMPLETED 1.Site work 2,800.00 2.Bypass 3,200.00 3.Demolition 3,000.00 4.Top slab 4,500.00 5.Pumps A piping 32.000.00 6.Electrical 2,500.00 48,000.00 2,200.00 2.500.00 3.000. 00 3.500.00 20,000.00 1.000. 00 32,200.00 Amount completed 32.200.00 5* retainer 1,610.00 Amount due this billing $ 30,590.00 Paul T. Ogland f Owner City of Orono, 1335 Brown Road, Crystal Day, MN 55332 Date November 6,1991 i.. nw • a Sl3if !o October 31, 19*^1 Request No. 1 CfMLndOf Norlh'vcst Mcchsntcal, Inc., 432 Mill S4rccl Box 40, Long L«ikc, MN 533^ RrOUEST FOR PAYMENT Lift Station No. II Renovation File No. 13959 SUMMARY 1 Original Contract Amount 2 Change Order • Addition 3 Change Order - Deduction 4 Reviled Contract Amount 5 Value Completed to Date • Material on Hand 7 Amount Earned • Lom Rclainage 5% f Sub-Total 10 Leu Amount P«d Previously * 11 AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST l OR PAYMENT NO. % *■ $ $ S $ $ $ 1 S Recommended for Appiaval by; ■OMCSTROO, R^ISENE, ANDERLlK A ASSOaATES. INC. .Or ^ ‘ **tkwuaai Approved by Contractor MORTHWEST MEGHAMTAL INC Approved by Owner. CITY OF ORONO. MN Spacifled Contract C''npletion Date; October 31. 1991 Date: lUfajup [i£ 48,000 00 32.200i» 32.20OA0 IAIOjOO 30490i» aoo 30490.00 I W f h * » * lltm UnM rootmct Quantify II'll Prka Qminllly To Dolt To IMo Riifi Bid 1 The total price for the lift stalioii renovation to mcftide the removal of existing equipment, piping, controls, and accessories; installation of a coBCfete lop slab w/accesshatch; site improvements; electrical work; painting and other misc. items speciHed Total Work Completed to Date 48.000.00 0.67 32;m I $32,: l)iSf.RP»RP-1 f; ?- ‘f %■ yniFTT PAYMENT STATUS City of Orono Lift Station No. 11 Renovation Project No. nbN&13959 Northwest Mechanical, Inc. CaiANne QKDERS No. Dttc Total Change Ordeta - Add IK Na 1 IBl Period Start 10-31-91 Payroent $30,590.00 ReUiaage $1,610.00 Coaqdeted 13Wi I I T f I 2 3 4 5 6 7 t 9 10 Total Payment to Date Katahiage, Payment No. Total Vdae Completed $30,590.00 1.610.00 $32,200.00 Original Contract Change Orders Revised Contract S48J $4«J LL■Mm yyjijji 1JM9JUT RP-2 : m-- 5 1U - fr- if L--'k.* ’.'Pvi hT f Ir 3- ?'■k ii' % |i'- 112091.4 i TO: Mayor and City Council rSOM: Ron Moorse, City Administator DATS: November 20, 199i COtrJCIL MEETING NOV 2 5 1991 CITY OF ORONO SUBJECT: County Road 15 Safety Improvements I have attached a letter from Pat Murphy, Director of Hennepin County Department of Public Works, concerning the need for major maintenance on County Road 15 and suggesting the maintenance project could be expanded into a safety improvement project to address a number of safety issues. Mr. Murphy will attend the November 25, 1991 Council meeting to discuss the alternatives with the Council. r HENNEPIN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 320 Washington Avenue South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343’8468 PHONE (612)930-2500 FAX (612)930-2513 TDD: (612)930-2696 m S 1991 Nove«ber 4, 1991 Ron Hoorse City Adnlnlstrator City of Orono 1339 South Brown Road P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay. HN 55323 CSAH 15 FROM NAVARRE TO WAYZATA Dear Ron During the past several months, I have concluded that there Is a real need for the County and the Involved Cities to discuss problems and potential solutions for CSAH 15 between CSAH 19 and T.H. 12. Concerns continue to be expressed, and seem to be Increasing, In regard to safety issues including concern for sight distances at public roads and driveway intersections, and turn lanes. Many of the locations have been Issues for several years. In addition, the condition of the pavement throughout tMs segment of CSAH 15 is deteriorating to the point where major maintenance. Including resurfacing and shoulder repair, are necessary In order to prevent a rapid dec!ire in the pavement condition over the next several years. These major maintenance activities are relatively costly and we do not normally make that investment unless we are reasonably confident that no additional Improvements will be needed for the next 15 years. As a result of these Issues, perhaps 1i Is time to make permanent Improvements to CSAH 15 In order to address the sa.^ety issues rather than spend substantial dollars for major maintenance work and not be able to address many of the safety issues. On September 9, 1991, I was InvUed to a Minnetonka Beach City Council Meeting to heir their concerns over the safety of several intersections. At that meeting, I suggested that the County develop a general concept plan for a project that could deal with the problems In a comprehensive manner rather than on a piecemeal basis The Minnetonka Beach City Council expressed Interest In a corjept plan being developed and I an attaching a copy of the resolution they passed at that meeting HENNEPIN COUNTY on equal oppoftumty employer Ron Hoorse November 4, 1991 Page Two Orono did provide direction In 1984 via City Council Resolution Nos. 1605 and 1694 In regard to Orono’s expectations for CSAH 15. The County did receive the State Aid variance supported by Resolution No. 1694. I believe that variance makes it possible for the County to develop a concept which would be acceptable to Orono. I have also attached a brief chronology of the history of this project up to the time that the variance was granted as a means of providing background to you in regard to this segment of roadway. I would like to meet with the Orono City Council in the near future to determine whether the City Is Interested in the County developing a concept plan over the winter for the purpose of determining whether there is interest in considering a permanent liqirovement rather than major maintenance. Will you please schedule this Item on the agendo for a City Council Meeting in the near future. I look forward to hearing from you. Please call me If you have any questions. Sincerely, Patrick B. Murphy, P.E. Director PBMiJfe Attachments r*-k':- fl.K. RESOLUTIOM NO. 1991-33 THE CITT OF THE VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA UEACH Pursuant to due call and notice tnereof, a Regular Counci- Mating of tna City Council of tne City o£ tne Village ot Nlnnatonka Rescn, Minnesota, was neld on tne 9tn Saptamoer, 1991.The following memoers were day ot oresent: Mayor Aodo, Treasurer Bersie, Council memoers MarKle, CnecK and Brodarsan.The following memoers were aosent: Council mamoer Rooart Melamed. Council Mnoer Check introduced tne following Resolution ana novad its adoption: Tnat tna City of the village of Minnetonka Beach in tna intarast of puolic safety, requests tnat H*’ ' )pin County conduct a feasioillty study regard- ii na creation of pssing and turning lanes on Hwy. tlb itnin tna City of Minnetonka Beacn while main taining tne highway as a two-lane road. The motion for adoption of tne foregoing Resoiutio? nil seconded oy Councilman drodersen, ana upon voce oeing caKe*. thereon, the following voted in favor tnereof: Markle, Broaerser. and CnecK. The following voted against or aostained: None. Melamed was aosent. Whereupon tne Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted 1967 1966 09/69 09/06/69 11/10/69 12/15/69 03/02/70 03/70 06/31/70 1/19/74 01/03/64 I* CHRONOLOGY OF CSAH 15 FROM CSAH 110 TO HILLSIDE DRIVE A survey was taken on CSAH 15 just east of CSAH 125 which included eastbound traffic only. Approximately 1,000 questionaires were distributed. The drivers were asked questions such as home address, trip origin and destination, purpose of trip, was it daily, and their preference as to which route should be upgraded. Four hundred seventy responded, and 325 of those responses recommended the upgrading of CSAH 15. Special meeting was conducted by Hennepin County with Orono to discuss CSAH 15 plans. It was Indicated that 7,500 vehicles per day warranted a four lane roadway. Representatives from Orono agreed with Hennepin County’s proposed construction program and will consider and respond to the 1969 proposed Improvement of CSAH 15 from CSAH 110 to CSAH 19. Spring Park and Hound meet with Hennepin County to discuss the proposed construction of CSAH 15 as a four lane roadway. Orono adopted a resolution that directed Hennepin County to abandon plans for a four lane roadway from Hound to Navarre and Navarre to Excelsior on CSAH 19. The resolution recommended that Hennepin County should develop plans to upgrade CSAH’s 110, 44 and 92. Minnetonka Beach adopted a resolution to abandon plans for a four lane highway on CSAH 15 from Hound to Navarre and Navarre to Excel sioi. A Public Meeting was conducted by Hennepin County to discuss the Hennepin County highway planning In the Lake Minnetonka area. Various exhibits on traffic volumes were shown and It was indicated that tr volumes on CSAH 15 from CSAH 110 to CSAH 19 warrant a four lane ro'/. Spring Park adopted a resolution that supports a 51 foot r"ad with the condition that a bypass at Seton Channel Bridge is constructed. Memo from Art Lee to Herb Klossner and Joe Klemenhagen regarding meeting with representatives of the Villages of Orono. Spring Park. Minnetrista and the city of Mound to discuss a possible approach to transportation planning In the Lake Minnetonka area. It is indicated that the villages’ support the premise that It Is possible to divert traffic from CSAH 15 by providing a ring route access to TH No. 12. Spring Park and Mound adopt a resolution that recommend-s Hennepin County to Improve CSAH 15 from Spring Park’s easterly border to CSAH llO by constructing a modern commercial type road 44 feet in width with curb, gutters, bike paths and sidewalk the entire le "th of the p-oject. Spring Park passed a resolution setting minimum needs for the .uprovemcnt of CSAH 15. The needs are: 1. 2. 3. 4. Two lanes of continuous traffic. Concrete sioewalks and concrete curb and gutter Right and left turn lanes where needed. Improvements within the existing County right of way CHRONOLOGY OF CSAH 15 FROM CSAH 110 TO HILLSIDE DRIVE Page 2 01/24/84 02/13/84 03/01/84 03/01/84 03/09/84 03/27/84 05/30/84 10/29/84 10/84 11/84 08/07/85 11/16/87 11/87 11/23/87 11/87 12/22/87 Hound passed a resolution approving a concept for tue improvement of CSAH 15. Two lanes of continuous traffic with turn lanes where necessary and concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk. Orono passed a resolution setting minimum needs for the improvement of CSAH 15 (same requirements as stated in the Spring Park Resolution). Letter to Commissioner Robb from Walter Benson requesting the Board to improve CSAH 15 via the resolutions previously passed by the Cities to present resolution collectively to the Board. Letter to Commissioner Robb from Walter Benson requesting the Board to improve CSAH 15 via resolutions previously passed by the Cities. Letter to all commissioners from Commissioner Robb describing the Improvements to CSAH 15. Resolution by Hennepin County Board jirecting County Staff to meet with officials of the cities regarding improvements to CSAH 15. Letter to Vern Genzlinger expressing thanks and satisfaction with the proposed compromise to the improvements t? ''SAH I5. Orono adopts a resolution to approve the preliminary layout of CSAH 15 From 110 to CSAH 19 as a two lane roadway with bypass lanes at the intersections. The resolution also concurs with the County’s request to seek a variance for CSAH 13 from CSAH 110 to CSAH 19 and for CSAH 15 from CSAH 19 to Hillside Drive in Wayzata for one lane in each direction with no more than 8 foot wide shoulders. Soring Park adopts a resolution to approve the preliminary layout and concurs with the iance request. Mound adopts a resolution to approve the preliminary layout and concurs with the variance request. A variance was granted for a 44 foot roadway between CSAH 110 and CSAH 19 except that a full 52 foot with no parking be provided west of Wilshire Boulevard to CSAH 110. A variance was also granted on CSAH 15 from CSAH 19 to Hillside Drive for slower speeds at Bracketts Point (25 mph) and at Lafayette Road and Orono Lane (35 mph). Spring Park approves the detail for the reconstruction of CSAH 15 from CS^h 110 to CSAH 19. Hound approves the detail plans. Orono pproves the detail plans. Bids are opened. The Contract is awarded to Hardrives Inc. 4 CHRONOLOGY OF CSAH 15 FROM CSAH 110 TO HILLSIDE DRIVE Page 311/02/89 03/25/91 09/09/91 10/29/91 Construction was completed. Memorandum from Commissioner Jude explains that he has been contacted by constituents concerning the lack of a paved shoulder and ruts developing in the surface of CSAH 15 from CSAH 19 to Wayzata. Patrick Murphy meets with the City of Minnetonka Beach to discuss if the County should pursue a capital Improvement project on CSAH 15 from CSAH 19 to Wayzata. Ron Moorse and John Gerhardson met with Hennepin County staff to discuss If a capital Improvement project to improve CSAH 15 from CSAH 19 to Hillside Driv should be pursued. The improvement discussed is for one lane in each direction with 8 foot shoulders and right and left turn lanes where needed. G«/BMP:aak 11/04/91 i Toi Mayor Peter on & Orcno Council Meiitbei s City Administrator Moorse COUNCIL MEEmiG MOV 2 5 1991 CITY OF ORONO / Froas Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator November 21, 1991 Subjects Marina Licenses - Options for Review of 1992 l.icenses Diecneaion In December, staff will be mailing marina license applications to the seven marina operations in the City. Per Council's direction, application fees paid in 1990 and 1991 shall be credited towards the 1992 license fee. In two cases, Minnetonka Boat Works and Shoreline Marina and Yacht Club, this would still leave a future credit of more than $400.00 each, which could be credited towards the 1993 license if Council desires. In the case of North Shore Drive Marina, there is an issue of the historically licensed number of slips/dry stack spaces, hence the correct license application fee remains to be determined. Licoase Mowiew Options Prior to 1966, marina license applications were reviewed by a Marina Committee which was advisory to the Council. Applicants were invited to discuss their marina operation with the committee, and outstanding issues or problems were reviewed in some detail. This pro*~ '8 included a staff review of the license applications to idi '■y issues or concerns prior to marina committee review. Council has the option to consider two di.* action: courses of 1. 2. Continue the process outlined above with review of an advisory body to the Council, dealing with problems and concerns prior to issuance of license. OR Issue each license as merely «*n administrative function without detailed review, then deal with problems and concerns as they may occur. Virtually all of the marinas in Orono fail to meet many performance standards of the ronlug code. These "non-conformities" may be site-related issues (i.e. hardcoves:, structures too close to the lake or lot lines, etc.) or operations^ issues (i.e. boat storage location, vehicle parking dry stacking/traiIrr storage services, etc.). The existing site non-conformities are 'or the most part "grandfathered* or were the subiect of e past variance approval, and cannot easily be made more conforming unless a zoning application for improvements to the property is fcrthcomirg. We have re antly had rr.iiT- ». Marina ticenses Novemh|Br *21, 1991 Page 2 the opportunity to deal . :h site issues on three marinas (Windward, Minnetonka Boat Works, ai. Shoreline Drive Marina) where commercial site plan review and approval was necessary in order to do major Improvements to the property. '‘-related zoning code requirements ,g effort. The temporary nature of aining open spaces, proper setbacks, tomer parking, etc., makes the On the other hand, op require a more diligent mo. boat storage in relation to . and adequate employee and operational aspect much more difficult to regulate. You can deny or ^pp]^ove construction of a building, and it's either there or it isn t. But boats and trailers are mobile, and can't be feasibly monitored on a regular basis. Given the nature of potential marina issues, it would seem that we need to all be comfortable with a starting point for each marina, reorient ourselves to the previously approved site plans, parking plans, laf'H«cape plane, etc., determine what past issues ate yet unresolved and deal with them, and then get back to a regular process of yearly licensing with regularly scheduled inspections. The Lake Ose Committee was recently sent copies of Section 5.4? Business and Joint Use Licensing Requirements and Standards, and Section .!u,41, the B-2 Lakeshore Business District Ordinances. Before we yet ^ret too wrapped up in marina license reviews for 1992, if -he Lake Ose Committee ir going to review those licenses, we need to become familiar with the requirements of the Code as well as its limitations and inconsistencies. Staff BernaMendstion Staff would request that the Council determine a proc<»ss for 1992 marina license review. The following process is recommended: 1. Marina license applicMtlons to be mailed out in December. Credit for '90-91 fees allowed as noted above. 2. Staff to lay out issues for each marina. 3. Lake Use Committee directed to familiarize themselves wit’.*> the marina license Codes. 4. Lake Use Committee to review license application*. February ar*'' return a recommendation to Council regar *. each license. 5. Council to issue licenses in March, 1992. r 112091.2 ) / TO: FROM: DATS: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator COt'NCa MEETING NOV 2 5 1991 CITY OF ORONO November 20» 1991 SOBJBCT: Spates Avenue Traffic Concerns I have attached a memo from John Gerhardson concerning a traffic problem on Spates Avenue. Spates Avenue is being used as a shortcut from County Road 15 to Brown Road South creating unsafe conditions on the narrow residential street. The recommended solution is to eliminate direct access from Spates Avenue to Brown Road South. This would be accomplished by placing barriers on Spates Avenue on both sides of the railroad track. TOt rsoMt Ron Moorse# City Administrator r'i Jolui R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director DATIs NoVemb'*'^ 14, 1991 SOBJBCTi Spates Avenue/Railroad Avenue On Thursday November 7, 1991, Police Chief Steve Sullivan and myself met with some of the residences on Spates Avenue and Railroad Avenue. The reason for the meeting was to discuss traffic concerns that the residents have and a possible resolution to the problem. Currently there are 400 vehicles per day using Spates Avenue. Some of the traffic is due to traffic back up at Co. Rd» 15 & 51 causing people to try to avoid the intersection by driving on Railroad Avenue to Spates Avenue to Co. Rd. 15. This traffic is mostly in the early morning rush hour. The other concern is afternoons and evenings when southbound Co. Rd. 15 traffic is turning on to Spates Avenue at high rates of speed causing concern because of children in or near the roadway on bikes and trikes. Everyone agreed that placing barriers on Spates Avenue on both sides of the railroad track would discourage the high speed traffic from using Spates Avenue (see attached sketch). It was agreed that we would recommend to Council to place the barricades as soon as possible but review the turn at Railroad Avenue and Spates Avenue to determine if the radius should be revised. X pvx t V V^V-' . ■i.- ■rV^' m COUNCIL r^'niNG NOV ? 5 1991 TO:Mayor and City Council / CITY OF r PROM:Ron Moorse, City Administrator DATE: r November 21, 1991 SUBJECT:Resolution Ordering Plans and Requesting Bay Sewer Project Bids for Stubbs The Council, at the completion of the Stubbs Bay sewer project public hearing, took action to direct the preparation of plans and to authorize the request for bids for the construction of sanitary sewer for the Stubbs Bay area. I have attached a resolution reflecting the Council's action. & A RBSOLOTION ORDERING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND RBQOBSTING BIDS FOR STOBBS BAT SEWER PROJECT WHBRBAS, the City of Orono is a municipal organization existing under the laws of Minnesota, and WHBREAS, the City of Orono has prepared a fen.iibility stuto determine the feasibility of serving the Stubbs Oay area wich sanitary sewer, and NHBRBAS, the Stubbs Bay area is considered to be: Part 1 Part II Part III Part IV Part V Part VI Part VII Stubbs Bay N W Stubbs Bay N E Bayside East Bederwood Bayside North Oxford Cygnet Place, and NHBRBAS, the City of Orono did conduct a public hearing on this matter on November 22, 1991 at 7:00 p.m. at the Orono Council Chambers to receive citizen input. MOW, THBRBPORB, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Orono Council does hereby direct the City Engineer to prepare plans and specifications and to accept bids to determine the cost for the construction of sanitary sewer for the Stubbs Bay area Parts I thru VII as listed above. Adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting on November 25, 1991. ATTEST:Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk R' TO: from: DATS: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator November 21, 1991 SUBJECT: Revised Fee Schedule COUNCIL MEETING NOV ? S 1991 CITY OF ORONO The attached ordinance, setting out a revised fee schedule for 1992, is presented for Council adoption. OFFICIAL SOMMARY OP ORDINANCE NUMBER SECOND SERIES ORDINANCE NO.SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 1992 FEE SCHEDULE AM ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 91 SECOND SERIES AND ORDINANCE NO. 95 fBCOND SERIES The following is the official summary of Ordinance Number fccond Series approved by the City Council of the City of Orono The following sections have changes, additions and/or deletions: DMCRIPTIOM 1991 PEE 1992 PEE RIMIIMC APPLICATIOMS Application Type VARIANCE Variance for Non-Conforming Use $200.00 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Institutional Use (School, Church, etc.)$150.00 Ranawal Conditional Use Permit (no change from original application) 1/2 Current Fee $175.00 $100.00 fUBOIVISION Sketch Plan (Class I, ll & III) Preliminary Review (Class 1 6 II Subdivisions) Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) $150.00 $250.00 $200.00 $300.00 Final Plat Review (Class III) $300.00+ $20/lot ($360/3 lots $380/4 lots) $150.00 plus Legal/ Engineering charges $325.00+$25/lot $400.00/3 lots $425.00/4 lots $175.00 plus special Legal and Engineering charges Filing Fees: b) Subdivision ■¥ Easements 6 Covenants $150.00 Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Final Subdivision Application $200.00 minimum plus any additional costs 1/2 of current $150.00 fee $100.00 BASEMENT VACATIONS WITH SUBDIVISON APPLICATIONS $ 50.00 $ 75.00 BONING AMENDMENTS INCLUDING REZONING $250.00 $300.00 ■rr I• ■> ;v -• ^i- DB8CRIPTI0N 1991 FEE 1992 PEE BOMIIIG APPLICATIONS PUD Rezoning: Residential S250.00 + $35,00 per dwelling unit $300.00 $40.00 per dwelling unit REQUEST TO AMEND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN $250.00 $300.00 SPECIAL IMPROVEMENTS Proposed Sanitary Sewer Main Extension Proposed Watermain Extension $250.00 plus $250.00 plus $5.00 per stub $25.00 per stub $250.00 plus $250.00 plus $5.00 per stub $25.00 per stub SURCHARGE FOR STAFF EXPENSE IN EXCESS OF APPLICATION FEES Professional Time Clerical Time $ 28.00/hour $ 16.75/hour $ 29.00/hour $ 17.25/hour CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND INSPECTION FEES BUILDING PERMIT Minimum Fee $ 30.00 $ 15.00 RETAINING WALLS (in excess of 42" also multiple tiered walls that exceco 42" end not located in lakeshore protected area) $ 30.00 minim' (per . UBC $ 15.00 minimum tanr'.-ird Schedule) DEMOLITION PERMIT Principal Structure $ 25.00 for $ 25.00 for each each requested requested or inspection required beyond initial inspection beyond inspection initial inspection PLUMBING PERMIT $ 5.00/ fixture $ 3.00/ fixture reset $ 8.00/fixture $ 5.00/fixture reset SPRINKLER SYSTEMS > COMMERCIAL •fire sprinkler systems $ 2.00 per $ 2.00 per head/ head/first 50 first 50 heads - heads - $0.30 $.50 per head per head after after initial 50 initial 50 Plan Review Plan Review » 1/2 permit permit fee fee 65% ?.■« DI8CRIPTI0N 1991 FEE 1992 FEE C0II8TR0CTI0N PERMITS AND IWSPECTIOM FEES MUNICIPAL CONNECTION PERMIT (together with ai.ea connection charges) Hater 5/0" meter including sales tax 3/4" meter including sales tax 1" meter including sales tax $125.00 $163.00 $218.00 $133.00 $181.00 $235.00 ALL COmiBCTION CHARGES (IF NOT PREVIOUSLY ASSESSED) BT DISTRICT - PROiE^T ALL SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES ALL MUNICIPAL WATER CONNECTION CHARGES ON-SITE SYSTEMS Residential System Permit: Repair/Replace existing system Replace drainfield & repair 1/more tanic New Residential System Replace Drainfield & Replace 1/ more tank Annual Service Charge GRADING, EXCAVATING, FILLING • 1-100 cubic yards (max. 10 loads) ’.T.--: r Various Various reflecting cost of investment Various Various reflecting cost of investment $ 30.00 $ 50.00 $ 75.00 $ 50.00 Delete $100.00 $20.00 per each inspection over 3 (Includes outhouse on Big Island) $ 50.00 Delete $ 25.00/system $ 50.00/system/year year plus an plus an additional additional full $10.00 fee for fee for late late penalty plus penalty plus 8% interest for 8% interest for unpaid charges unpaid charges certified, certified. $ 50.00 $ 50.00 (staff permit) (-t* engineering $100.00 if fee if engineering fee necessary) necessary) I DESCRIPTION 1991FEE 1992FEE COESTEOCTIOM PERMITS AMD INSPECTION FEES BUILDING MOVING OR LIFTING Moving accessory building Moving principal buildings If SPECIAL INSPECTION CHARGES Reinspection fee after failure to comply with Building, Septic, or Zoning Code correction I :!' ■Nell Site Inspection LICWSES a mSCBLLAMBOOS CHARGES ZoniBQ Department Administered Comp. Plan Amendment *2 (Hwy 12) On-Site Design Manual Cetietal Administrative Documents Reprint of Oversized Documents that have been microfilmed Current Street Address Book DOGS AT LARGE - RELEASE FEE After Hour t Weekend Release Charge P1RBARM8 DISCHARGE PERMIT OCCASIONAL Game Animals (limited use) is ili adta Changed building size to conform to State Statutes Changed building size to conform to State Statutes Added Septic to reinspection fee No change in fee $ 30.00 No Charge 5.00 $ 5.00 Delete $ 25.00 $ 2.50 (approx Minimum charge 5 working days) $ 12.75 $ 45.00 $ 25.00 r DESCRIPTION 1991 FEE 1992 PEE IBLIC WORKS DBPARTHBNT MISCBLLANEOOS CHARGES COLF COURSE CHARGES - Effective date 1992 Season Monday thru Friday (excluding Holidays) Bagin Play Before 12:00 Noon let Nine Holes 2nd Nine Holes S S After 12 Noon and Weekend Rates 1st Nine Holes 2nd Nine Holes $ $ League Rates Monday thru Friday Senior Citizen (Over 60 years old) Begin Play Before 12:00 Noon - Weekdays 1st Nine Holes 2nd Nine Holes $ $ GOLF CART RENTAL Motorized Monday thru Friday (Excluding Holidays) Begin Play Before 12:00 Noon 1st Nine Holes 2nd Nine Holes STUDENT RATE (AGES 12 - 17) Begin Play Before Noon Monday - Friday, Excluding Holidays 1st Nine Holes 2nd Nine Holes 6.50 S 7.00 4.50 S 5.00 7.00 $7.50 4.50 S 5.00 6.50 S 7.00 4.50 $5.00 4.50 s 5.00 6.00 $7.00 $7.00 $5.00 $5.00 A printed copy of the 1992 Fee Schedule Ordinance is available for inspection by any person at the office of the City Clerk during regular office hours. This ordinance becomes effective the week of January 1, 1992. Adoped by the City Council of the City of Oorno on this _ _ _ _, 1991, by a vote of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ayes and day of snys ETTIST Barbara A, Peterson, Mayor (orotHy M. kaliin. City dlerk -,6L&ffeilhw.rr ir: U- 112091.3 /'J TO: PROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator COUNCIL MEETING NOV ? 5 1991 CfTV OF ORONO November 20, 1991 SOBJECT: Volunteer Commission Appointments Several members of the Planning and Park Commissions will complete their current terms in the coming months. Staff will send letters to them to determine their interest in serving an additional term. Guidelines for commission appointments indicate advertisements should be placed in the official newspaper, it may work better to delay the advertisement until the Council determines whether a vacancy will in fact be created by a current member going off a commission. Otherwise interested residents could apply only to find that the current members were all reappointed. This could discourage persons from applying for future vacancies. The following is a list of members whose terms will expire in the coming months: NAME COMMISSION 3 YEAR TERM EXPIRATION DATE 1 YEAR RENEWAL DATE Charles Kelley Planning 03/31/92 03/31/92 Maureen Bellows Planning 03/31/92 03/31/92 Sara Moos Planning 03/31/92 03/31/92 Charles Schroeder Planning 03/31/94 03/31/92 Edward Cohen Planning 03/31/94 03/31/92 Alexander Vongries Park 12/31/91 Philip Bradley Park 12/31/91 Lester Kelley Park 12/31/91 ^4? ill 111991.4 / TO: Mayor and City Council PROM: Ron Moorse, City Administrator DATS: November 19. 1991 COUNCIL MEETING NOV 2 5 1991 CI17 OF ORONO SUBJECT: Approval of Lease-Purchase Agreement for New City Facilities The Lease-Purchase Agreement related to the new city facilities has been forwarded to the City Council as part of the HRA agenda packet. Both the City Council and the HRA will be asked to approve th« Lease Purchase Agreement with the changes as indicated or subject to further revisions. Av'' CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO A PROJECT OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AJiD FOR THE CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Municipality: City of Orono/ Minnesota Governing Body: City Council Kindf date, time and place of meeting: A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ held November 25, 1991, at _ _ o'clock p.m. at the City Hall. meeting Members present: Members absent: Documents Attached: Minutes of said meeting (pages): through _ _ __ including: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RELATING TO A PROJECT AND CERTAIN REVENUE BONDS OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF ORONO; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF A LEASE-PURCHASE CONTRACT I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recordina officer of the municipal corporation considering the actions referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the docxments attached hereto, as described abov^, have been carefully conq>ared with the original records of the corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that the docuflsents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of the corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at the meeting, insofar as they relate to the actions; that the meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law and that the above- described Resolution has not been amended or repealed as of the date hereof. this WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer day of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, 1991. City Clerk After some discussion, Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved its i ioption: RESOLUTION NO. i f.- i RESOLUTION RELATING TO A PROJECT AND CERTAIN REVENUE BONDS OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF ORONO; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF A LEASE-PURCHASE CONTRACT WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Orono (the "Authority") proposes to undertake a project under the Housing and Redevelopment Act, Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047 (the "Act"), with respect to certain property located within the City comprising the property described on Exhibit hereto (the "Project"), for the purpose of providing necessary public facilities, including, without limitation, a new city ha’I and facilities to house the police and public works departments of the City (the "Project"), and to lease and agree to sell the Project to the City pursuant to the terms and conditions of a Lease-Purchase Contract, dated as of December 1, 1991 (the "Lease"), between the Authority, and the City,- as lessee; and as lessor. WHEREAS, the Authority has the power to lease and agree to sell the Project to City and enter into the Lease pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 465.035 and Section 471.64, Subdivision 1 and City has the power to lease and agree to purchase the Project and enter into the Lease pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.64, Subdivision 1 and Section 465.71; and WHEREAS, the Authority proposes to issue its Public Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series 19^1, in the aggregate principal amount of $4,000,000 (the "Series 1991 Bonds"), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.034 and 469.035, and an Indenture of Trust, dated as of December 1, 1991 (the "Indenture"),between the Authority and American National Ban)r and Trust Company, In St. Paul, Minnesota; the Series 1991 ”'*nds are payable solely from payments to be made by the City pursuant to the Lease and from the net proceeds of any Insurance claims or condemnation awards made with respect to the Project; and WHEREAS, the Authority has offered the Series 1991 Bonds for sale by means of an Official Statement, dated November 15, 1991 (the "Official Statement"); and WHEREAS, a form of the Lease and a form of the Official StatesMnt have been presented to this Council and are hereby ordered to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. • • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: 1. Apprr>v;i1 and ffv«»rutilQn of Lease. The Lease, substantially in the form presented uo this Council, is hereby approved. The Mayor and the City Cler)c (or, in the event of their absence or disability, the acting Mayor or the acting City Cleric, respectively) are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Lease in the name of and on behalf of the City. All of the provisions of th<> Lease, when executed and delivered as authorized herein, shall be deemed to be a part of this resolution as fully and to the same extent as if incorporated herein. The Lease shi^ll be substantially in the form now on file in the office of the City Clerk, with such necessary and appropriate variations, omissions and insertions as the Mayor shall determine to be necessary or appropriate, and the execution thereof by the Mayor shall be conclusive evidence of such determinations. 2. Approval nf Off trial .qr ar . The Official Statement is approved and it is hereby determined that the information contained therein regarding the City is accurate and complete. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute such certificates as may be appropriate concerning the accuracy, completeness and sufficiency of the Official Statement insofar as it contains information describing the City and the Lease. 3. Exoffuf-ion of Qth«*r Documents. Officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute such other certificates and documents as may be necessary and appropriate to effectuate the transactions contemplated by the Lease and the Official Statement. 4. Arbitrage Rebaf«» ExempMon. (a) The City hereby represents that it is eligible for the $5,000,000 exception for small goveriunental units to the arbitrage rebate provisions contained in Section 148(c) of the internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). Specifically, the City represents that the aggregate face amount of all "tax-exempt bonds" (including warrants, contracts, leases and other indebtedness, but excluding private activity bonds) issued by or on behalf of the City and all subordinate entities thereof during 1991 is not reasonably expected to exceed $5,000,000. To date in 1991, neither the City nor its stibordinate encities has issued any such tax-exempt bonds. (b) The City hereby irrevocably allocates to the Authority, with respect to the Series 1991 Bonds, a portion of the City’s $5,000,000 limitation under Section 148(f) (4) (D) (i) (IV) of the Code, equal to $4,000,000. It is hereby determined and declared that all of the facilities to be financed by the Series 1991 Bonds will be of direct and primary benefit to the City, and that the amount allocated to the Authority pursuant hereto bears a reasonable relationship to the benefits received by the City from the issuance of the Series 1991 Bonds. ^1. ll-- % ■ l! I?' i- Pi: i| •' «, Adopted this 25th day of November, 1991. Mayor Attest: City Clerk The motion for tne adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember and, upon vote beina taken thereon, the following CounciImembers voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon the resolution declared duly passed and adopted. --- t t k’‘; I j 4 LIST OP LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR MEETING OF November 25. 1991 Residential Kennel - Robert Waag 4760 West Branch Road On-Sale Liquor - Jimmies Lounge Jimmie Holtz 3380 Shoreline Drive COUNCIL MEE11N6 KOV 7. 5 1991' CfTV OF ORONO Off-Sale Liquor -Navarre Liquors, Inc. Steven Corl 3421 Shoreline Drive Club Liquor - Woodhill Country Club 200 Woodhill Road Of'f-Sale Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor On-Sale Non-Intoxicatirig Malt Liquor Navarre Lanes Don Scherven 3435 Shoreline Drive Off-Sale Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor - O’Sullivans John O'Sullivan 24 20 Sha^lywood Road On-Sale Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor -Lakeview Golf Course Grant R. Wenkstern 405 North Arm Drive *1^ « • • ^ f-li* an kznmel license application Effective January 1, 19^2:^ t° December 31, 19.^ Owner: H-ll^property Address: (include city end zxp; Mailing Address (if different):—---------- rbone. ---------- (wor!c)__ V.e peeTnuTXaL Kennel License Information: $25.00 (payment must accompany application) Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time:__^ (over 3 months of age) principal • Purpose for more than 2 dogs:_^^ Dogs normally kept: )C inside X kennel structure errat. Kennel tieenae Information! $150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business:. f '* I •Mr r I breeding, veterinary care. rerTTTT Cin OF ORONOrmncE office 1313500000 01 QER 25.00 .,J 71 25.00 RECUFT-Tim YOU 4^980 COOl ROl 712:5 11/13/9 Normal Business Hours: After Hours Contact: (name) (phone) Dog runs/exercise areas are:inside outside both 7he undereigned hereby make, on Vhis°ftrn! "^the ss/s5is:scrs%« n^Sreen^rt^'e/^/’eV «y o«« r...on.bl. liommse durationi and 5 35 including any special0? en^y kennel liemnse approval. III /s' {‘j. Date pfdbjt^TitSffeSl^bv !\/<UuUr^_ inds Approval_JC-. Denial ------ Date /!- 2h V.; r Inter-ct + ice J-te- ate: To: From: Re: November 19, 1991 Ron Moorse, City Administrator Stephen X. Sullivan, Cnie* o-f Police Liquor License Renewal - Jimmies Lounge This Department has reviewed all reocrts within the last y©Br ■frorn Jirrunies Lounoe. There were two employees charaed with serving liquor to minors in December, 1990. Bee attached memo +rom Lt. Cheswick to Mark Bernhardson, and the court disposition summaries on both defendants. As you will note on the disposition summaries, the defendants were found guilty, with the execution of the sentence "stayed". If they have no further violations, after the specified period of time, they would not be considered as "convicted" of a crime. I do not object to the renewal of this liquor license, but 1 want the Council to be aware of all relevant circumstances. DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: July 12, 1991 Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator Lt. Gary Cheswick Liquor Violation/Jimmies Lounge 1 reviewed the case files dated 12/4/90 and 12/16/90, regarding liquor violations at Jimmies Lounge. I concur with the attorney firm and Mel Kilbo's memo to you of 3/6/91, that the matter be brought in front of the City Council for consideration, whether it be revoking the license, suspending, or imposing a monetary fine. He have been referring liquor violations in Spring Park to their City Council which hive resulted in substantial fines and temporary closures to a local bar. If we are going to proceed in that direction, we may wish to do so soon as the offense is nearly 8 months old. hembepin county summary TO:City Administrator Chief of Police FROM:Kathryn Walker Torgerson Prosecuting Attorney DATE:February 27, 1991 DEFENDAIIT: Michael Brethorst OFFElfSE(S): Serving Liquor to Minors. DATE OF OFFENSE: December 18, 1990 ABSESTXNG OFFICER: Officer English and Officer Erickson CONTROL HO.: 90-6419 - - -— Qp PROCEEDINGS: This matter came on pretrial conference loSi At that time, the defendant and the CitysltJIs-srs - # no vlolfttiions of #ny r#Qul8tions concBrninQ th6 55 !h2^h« inclSdina thi chirge of serving liquor to SS!S;J'“nd'th5; ?b:'diSid»S%iy »100 ?n cost* to the city. OISPOSITWB: UPO. «. Pl« |v i r I h ?V- IT** f' f': Vv/ fc. ./ ■4^*' HENNEPIN COUirre MUNICIPAL COURT DISPOSITION SUMMARY CITY OF ORONO TO:City Administrator Chief of Police FROM:Kathryn Walker Torgerson Prosecuting Attorney DATE:February 27, 1991 DEFENDANT: James Holtz OFFENSE(S): Serving Liqucr to Minors. date of OFFENSE: December 18, 1990 arresting OFFICER: Officer English and Officer Erickson CONTROL HO.: 90-6419 _ _ _ _ „ This matter came on pretrial conferenceSOIMASY OF PROCEraiNCS. THIS defendant and the City no violations of any regulations concerning the defe^ant including the charge of serving liquor to ^ors, and that the'defendant pay $100 in costs to the city. Siss: r- V». # »% .1 :l 1 ■•> ■I. .1 HM1I (H4«l MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY UOUOR CONTROL DIVISION ROOM 440 333SmUYST. 8T. PAUL. MN S5101 PH0NCS12 2S6-61S9 CEimflCATION OF AN ON SALE AND/OR A 8L '.DAY UOUOR UCENSE 3219 ONSS JlMlt't Inc.12/31/91 Jfflilt't Loun9#$ 0.00 338U Shortitnc Or. Box 36 $ 4,000.00 NBVirrt. MN 55392 $ 200.00 • >1 ucRNimiloaaioiR oaaona udNSsmaoD COUNTY 1 ■ anaMi CtiUNOAV moM i«jL-Q2 TO L2.1I.Q2 tann .$ *•* i' * ONaaiaucMiNUMHa 9ft lOMMUm 1 BNnoo.o10 1iMMOAr.n $200.00 tuVNtMmoNi 471-7666 crrvoF ohjno ISSUING AUTHORITY (Ch«ck only oo«) ___________ COUNTY Of HENM. JliMis't Inot Corpo TfUOf MAMf OilOOA Jimmie's Loun«« NaTarr* 19 55192 aiO Mm M Atfa«w •« Uc*i ftnnar: M • Coipoitiion. S«M9 Ntmt tnd AdAMt •« Uc«« Of near Aoomtt Aooatfs Aoontit 37A. U muot UMRy InManoa IDram ShopI - ISO.OOO piir parson; 1100.000 mora than ona parson; $10,000 psaparty iaaavetiofi; $60,000 and $100,000 for losa of mams of support. ATTACH *XERTtf ICATE Of INSUR ANCE** TO TH« FORM □ aa□ ft. AftiaatvbafidfcamaRaaiycompany adth minimum covarapasaaspadfiadabova In A. C. A oarfMIcala tram tia ftlala Tiaaaurar ftiat tha Ucanaaa has daposHad with tha Stata, Trust Funds having a martwc valua at $100,000 or $ 100.000 In caNi or sacurHias. IOBITPY THAT THB UCEWi WAS AFFROVEO IN AN Of FIQAL MEETINQ BY THE GOVERTENQ BODY OF THE CITY OR COUNTY. CnrY/COUMTY SEAL Oivan Undsr My Hand and tha Corporafa Saahhia___________day of______111 VMf hM • Mwnom hMR ImmB undv Ih, Liquor CM UMly O Vn Q NO Nvoo,onaohoooRyc*«wtumnano. OOMPUm TMOHITMB THAT APPLY DIM omyrw O atvoapCANcn OATiSSMVlMaON raoM TO moomocnmhmom ooMOMaoMotomi • I j.* ; • r MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OP PUBLIC SAFETY LIQUOR CONTROL DIVISION ROOM 44Q 333 SIBLEY STREET ST. PAUL. MN SStOt PHONE 6t3-39S-S1S9 APPLICATION FOR OFF SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE OR THE RENEWAL OF AN OFF-SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION TYPE □ NEW OR TRANSFER COMPLETE SECTIONS 1. 2 and 4 CHECK ONE C8 RENEWAL - COMPLETE SECTIONS 1. 3 and 4 6641 Orono OFSL 12/31/91 Navarre Liquors Inc.$ 150.00 3421 Shoreline Or $ 0.00 Navarre, MN 55392 S 0.00 IF NAME AND ADOBE SS SHOWN AB£ NOT COBBECT make CHANGES IN SPACES BELOW 8 E C T I O N 1 ^ - NX'V>V>V> . If a corporation, an otiicar than macula this app»cation. If a partnership, a partner shall execute this application I T»aOB N atw Of PiiA X-Vj ^___^______________________________________ ADpHCAnt 9 Hom« PhonoLiCPnSB P*r*oOi F'om TSUtB I Os*» 0* wtfi '\X-M 2<o Cootsrsxv m iifHPvRiuti AopHcmnt) M a eorporaUofr MMa nima. data of birth, address, tilla. and shares held by each officer boi.AdOrvgg ^ » ViVv><A C'fv oli\MdTMS CrtyX rti« o6t AdOrMM Cny t«m 8Fm« bof Addrwaa C-v Tiiid SiM/M t I 8 8 C T I O N 1. If a corporation, data ol incorporation, authorizad capitalization_________ .. state incorporated m annount of amount of paid in capital . if a subsidiary of any Other corporation, to ttata..give purpose of corporation _________________________________if incorporatad urtder the laws trf another state, it corporation authorized to do buainoas in the State of Minnesota?_______Number of certificate of authority------------ 2. Oaacriba premieea to which licertse applies: such as (first floor, second floor, basement, etc ). ____________________________Of i* entire building, so state___________________ & la attabliahfnent locattd naar any state university, state hospital, training school, reformatory or prison? _____________ ■■ suia appitwlmaie distance___________________ 4. Stale name and address of owner of building. has owner of buMding any connection, diractly or indirectly, with applicant?. & Is ippticani, u any of the aseocislee m thfe eppilcation. e member of the governing body of the miiniripaHty in which ‘K ' license is to be issued?___________If so m what capacity--------------------- 8 StMa whalhtr any p lar man applicants has any right, title or interest in the turniture, natures, or eouipmaid for whic* is applied, and if so give name and details----------------------------------------- 7. Have applicanis any interest whstsoever. direetty or indirectly, in any other liquo' establishment m the stale of Mlnnaaota?________________Give name and address of such sstsbiishmenl.^---------------------------- r E I t t ■ S E C T 1 0 N 2 C 0 N T 1 N U E D 8 Under what classilication is Ihe license applied tor: EXCLUSIVE OFF-SALE LIQUOR STORE. DRUG STORE. COMBINATION ON & OFF LIQUOR. OR GENERAL FOOD STORE.................. . _____ ____ 9. Are the premises now occupied, cr be occupied by me applicant entirely separate and exclusive trom any other business establishment^____________ to. If a drug store, state length ol time the store has been m operation . __ ______________ 11. State whether applicant has. or will be granted, an On Sale Liquor License m conjunction vxiiti this Otf-Sale Liquor License, and tor the same premises ___________________— ...-----------------------------— 12. Slate whether applicant has. or will be granted a Sunday On-Saie Liquor License m conjunction with the regular On-Sale Liquor License ___________________ ___— ............. — — ------------------------- 13. If Ihis application is for a County Board Oil Sale License, state ihe distance >n miles to the nearest municipality 8 E C T I O N I 1. Stale whether applicant, or any of the associated m this application have ever had an application tor a Liquor LIcanse rejected by any municipality or State authority, it so give date and details Vc>o 2. Has tha applicanl. or any ol the associated m this application, during the live years immediately preceding this application ever had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revoked tor any violation ol such latM or local ordinances: it so, give date and details _________________---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- & Stato whether applicant, or any of the associates in this application, and employees while employed by applicant during Ihe past five years were convicted of any Liquor Law m this state, or under Federal Laws, and if so, give date and details. 4. During the past licensa year has a summons been issued under the Liquor Civil Liability Law (Oram Shop) M.S. 340A802. □ Yes No. If yes. attach a copy of the summons. S E C T I O N This Licensee must have one of the following: CHICK ONI [S A. Liquor I >ab«lily insurance (Dram Shop) — $50,000 oer person. $100,000 more than one person, $10X)00 property destruction; $50,000 and $100,000 for loss of moans of support. ATTACH "CERTIFICATE OF _ INSURANCE TO THIS FORM.on W B. A Suraty bortd from a surety company with mmimum coverages as spec'iied above in A. D C. A corlllicale from the State Treasurer that the Licensee has deposit'd tha State. Trust Funds having markst value of StOO^XW or $100j000 in cash or securities that the answers are true and correct ol my own knowledge. ---------------- IT BY POLICE DEPARTMENT This is to certify that the applicanl. and the asaoctates. named herein have not been convicted within the past ftve lor any vioiaUon ol Laws of tha State of Minnesota, or Municipal Ordinances relating to Intoxicating Liquor. except as foHowa. IMPORTANT NOTICE AU RETAIL LIQUOR LICENSEES MUST HAVE A CURRENT FEDERAL SPECIAL OCCUPATIONAL STAMP THIS STAMP IS ISSUED BY THE BUREAU OF ALCOHOL. TOBACCO AND FIREARMS FOR INFORMATION CALL ^1! ■■ tP.y‘ •< t: r I t; ii' 1^- |v I'-f I I- f:n, n‘! 1^, I w' '■■f'' Interoffice Memo Date: To: From: Se: November 15, 1991 Ron Moorae - City Administrator Stephen X. Sullivan - Chief of Police Liquor License - Woodhill Country Club I have reviewed all past incidents at Woodhill Country Club and have not found any type of violation. Therefore, I would recommend issuance of the liquor license. r h rilOV 6 1891 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY LIQUOR CONTROL DIVISION 333 SIBLEY • ST. PAUL. MN 55101 PHONE (61*>) 296*6434 PS90l6ill 891 application fob club on sale retail liquor license t. II k... .....nniAtoH h\/ an officer of the club seeking a license. This application and the proof Thia application shall be ^ ^ j , rtt or the county auditor. To qualify for a license a Of liquor liability continuous existence for at least three years, have an elected s^les .0 members and bon. (ide only The annua, bcense fee is se. by s.a.u,e (mT wOa SoSI. Granling of a license by ihe c,,y or county rs drscrelronanr. TYPC OH PHINT Club N»m* Of DBA Csrporwion N«m« r.n^otrg C.Uib rOoa ^ BSI __yLpcsiion (SlfMt ^nn iOmdhi IL 1^£6d Muinciptlity DroOiQ auililme OwpHf t N»W From /- /- Jol3-5l-9a Counrv Hmoepin Sa5 ahddh'ii/ ?nacl unx.inm ^ \ — i Ara there any delinquent ^ W ! taxaa o« the property? -------------— t m 1 1 1 MuJM . / ■ A ------------------------------------------------- Club MfT|b9«T s N«m« fmrL n. Pilhr^rhf iHim U tn •«•»«« C. Kra+ion iiV\L\Zr=rtA. Tviia T' iLYcd 3§a§I HoAtimlcn ftoirit 12d. LOtsf kWi?<atcai 5SM/ Iu JI'mUS oi ao.rb •SariJ^K 1 / hsPrlPtCP Intis' xrv'irq f^uenoe, 2ou±k. minntapDl^, fTTiy 554Oi _ j n^if- T' •*—r~^ T\ai 1"T" rvAP 11 5440 k^rtKcmc'toad The licansaa must have one of the following; ! CNtCKOM -ennAn ! a A Liquoc U«.ilily insurance fOr.m Shop) - .50,000 per perptrc s100,000 ;!l*" ^oparty destruction; S50.000 and SI00.000 for loss of means of support. ATTACH CERTIFICATE OF 1 insurance * to THIS FORM , os A □ B. A Surety bond from a surety company with minimum coverage as specified above m A. ! □ c A certificaie from the Slate Treasurer that the License, has d«»5,l«f wrih the State, Trust Funds haying, marbel value of $100,000 or .100,000 in cash or secuniies JIW WT wiww « I Vatarant or Fraiar nal Jfqaniiation ‘Vn-trmfvr 60 'lumbar of Years m :urrant Quarters ^0^ of the Club Nuiftber of Club Members Will the Club be ^ Issued a Lawful □ Yes i^No Gambling License^ _______ 1. Are any members, officers, agents or empolyees paid profits from the sale of beverages to club members? _______________________________________________________________ 2. Are any employees paid salaries? 3. Has this club or any employee been convicted of a violation of Federal or State law or local ordinance relating to alcoholic beverages? OO______________________________________________ If so, give names, dates and violations 4. Does any wholesaler or manufacturer of alcoholic beverages own or have any interest in furniture, fixtures or equipment for the licensed premises? ^OQ___________________________________ If so, give details ___________________________________________________________________ 5. During the past license year has a Summons been issued under the Liquor Civil Liability Law (Oram Shop) M.S. 340A.802? □ Yes |^No If yes. attach a copy of the Summons. 6. Will you serve liquor on Sunday? Yes □ No Amount of Sunday License Fee ________ I certify that I have read the above questions and that the answers are true and correct of my own knowledge. S«9n«iur« ol Apoi*c«ni 0«it IF LICENSE ISSED BY THE COUNTY BOARD. REPORT OF COUNTY ATTORNEY I certify that to the best of my knowledge the applicants named above are eligible to be licensed. □ Yes □ No M no. state reason _______________________________________________________________________ lifnsfyr* Coynfv Aitornay County Oslo REPORT BY POLICE DEPARTMENT OR SHERIFF S OFFICE This is to certify that the applicant, and the associates, named herein have not been convicted within the past five years for any violation of Laws of the State of Minnesota, or Municipal Ordinances relating to Intoxicating Liquor, except as follows ___________________________________________________________________ Main*StfnMura LICENSE APPROVAL OR DENIAL License O Granted G Denied [ SIONATUftE CITY CLERK OR COUNTY AUDITOR DATE License jranted Denied SIGNATURE UQUOR CONTROL DIRECTOR DATE IMPORTANT NOTICE ALL RETAIL UQUOR UCENSEES MUST HAVE A CURRENT FEDERAL SPECIAL OCCUPATIONAL STAMP THIS STAMP IS ISSUED BY THE BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO AND FIRE ARMS. FOR INFORMATION CALL 612-290-3496. Iis r 1/ M i, f - , I Form No. 23B> AppNcitliMi far Ktltn I Icraw m SeU M»ll Uqu«# *•«.>“ I*rrmlv«. .tt ••Kvi^v\t C-a»* RETAIL “ON SALE’$75.00 l^tate oC iHinneaoCa, cotJXTr or......) .......................or To the .. ^ ...0 Q>flMfO of the ..<^ t-”’ ^/..'^.^.of ..... ........................................./...a'......Tk/.iP State of Minnesota: htriha appl^^-far o lUtn*$ for rt* Urmt of----- .. . ^ ^ /{.....--------------- ... . from iAo------...................L~i,................day of.......—......._ j"/ . — , 19?^, to »eU At Retail Only, Non-Intoiicating Malt Liquors, 04 ih0 $am4 aro dsfinod by law, for ootuumpHot^ **0/f** fhcoo eeriain promUw in ths ..... .............. __j^±r.x~.9..e ...QA.O't/A.. ............._....„/:?£^...^.^..........«c.rr.^...y._. i$teribod 4U feUow$, to-wU- ........A\//{..Vjf -----' S'. ............... oi which place cold appHeaai...opcralc f..thc btmiiccc of.... LA'' Cp . ^ to ikai omd fwpft mni...amd §taia .. as foUowt: Thai said appUeami -----y..^____^--------oUUsn of tPis United Staise; of good moral cKaraeto amd rspuis; and .....attiUnsd ths ago of tl ysars; that proprietor of ths sstablUhmsnt for which ths Ussnss will bs issusd if this application U granted. Thai ms masmfaeiurtr of such mon^iounsaUng malt Uguors has any awnsrship, in whds or in part, in said bnsimsss of said appUoani ..sr any intsrssi ihsrein; Thai said appUeani—maks...Ms appUeaiion pursuant and subject to all ths laws of Stats of Mimmssota and ths ordinamsss and regulations of said —il .....------------_________________ appUsabls thsrsto, which ars hsrsby mads a pari hereof, and hereby agree...to observe and obey ths same; 1( Mr. a immi wwi^laMl Each appUcom fynher states that by the commencement oj bust ness and hv July I of each succeedins year satd Oppiicont witi have paid the Federal Special Occupational Tax to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms for a retail deolsr. ////r/fz I • •• t'. * -f. 'K-- • f ■ }t: . :V . } ^ f I • • • Ns. Ul—AppMcMliHI t99 nwn ID MlNMi4«lo«iratlat Mill lifsof “Orr * frrmhr*. tr. n ••.A«V«I C^t RETAIL “OFF SALE”$25.00 l^tate o( iilmne0ota» , , . . ........i ^^r-y OF ^ ^ To the...<Z/.r.'l .o f . .C>M0f/e^ of the CoUAjT^ of !■{:£: .................../...a A .T..(rf:.<^ State of Mlnnwota: htnty appi/jf^ for a Ue$ntm for th* i*rm of . ^ --------™ ... /»»<iu__ JA .f-2 -----i«, f ^to mU In Orifinel Packafce ObIt, Non-Intoxicatiof Malt Liquora, •a HU MiM mn by tow, for ooiuumpHon "OFr’ thoto oort^ prtmUM to tho mt mkUk pUm mU m^plUatU ^jOfmraU^ ths huMfutt ^ u' jC / ^ Q^,.../ mmA te UUI mA —mA ftelt m foUoun: Tkm$ miA appUmm$ ^US...ift__________MU%n of tko Uni^ oWtujUf m4 ro^AUi mA koA....^ atiainod iks ago of f i ifoaro; that 11^. tJ S 0>/t^/il/M^proprUtar of ths ootaklithmtnf for whUk tko Uoomoo will ho toouoA if this appUoaHon is graaioA Tkah OOiA flyyliw"^ "uifrt___this appUo€Uioa purouani omA suhjoot to all tho law§ of tho Stati of Miamooota smA iko ardlaaaooo aoA rogulaUomo of oaiA oC^ ^^.^k^ppUeahlo thsroio, whisk aro horohg mads a paH htroofy omA ksrotp agroo^^ Jo oboorvo aad oboy tho oamo: Mm. •« Each appiiami furthtr stairs that by the commencement of business and by Juiy / of each succetding year said oppUcant mU hove paid the Federal Special Occupational Tax to the Bureau of Alcohol. Tobacco and Firearms for a mod dealer. fQiA/Jl __i.2i j i h- i'"' #• |: P'- -m-I#iKfe" ? >•: ir^ j:V V.'. Int'^roffice Memo Date: To: Fro.a: Re: November 19. 1991 Ron Moorse, City Administrator Stephen X. Sullivan, Chief of Police Liquor License Renewal This Department has reviewed all reports within the last year from the below named establishment. As no violations were found, I recommend the City renew the liquor license. The name of the establishment is: O'Sullivan's Gas Station/Convenience Store 2^20 Shadywood Road y ' r.. r'" V r.s M"ft ii ;l- > »i ■ u. feI f' I- Ip fv i « « • Vi* t 4* i • N«. 113—ApfHccikM f*r R«fiM l.lcffitt i« SHINM^««lcHliit MHI U^•nf “Oir * fwin**#*. ••r. n Amr«« C«« RETAIL “OFF SALE’S25.00 l^tate of iilinneoota, __________________ To Um.............................................of thft City City OronoOF... Orono State of Minneaota: John M. O'Sullivan lunby a UetnM for ths Urm of .. ..99S... from Uu first da^f of Ja_nua_r^_____, 19 ffii In Original Packagca Only. Non>Intoiicating Halt Liquors, 00 tho mmo mn do/lnoi ty loto. for oomoumptioo “OFr’ Vtoto ooHaim promUoo U Iho City ____________.................... 1 an ISOS—T-^t-------------r — ------------------------ .. •saa*«4*Mo«*«» •a»-tt-- - Orono O’Sullivans 2^20 Shaydwood Road mi whUk ^Hom $mid mpplUmmi —mp$rai§^^ ikm budmm of . ^^........ qas station/convenience store_ — - —----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------W —. » a ■■ ■— » ■ ■ OO S«« • • ••• • - i ■ SM Met MM i i -••^O ••• • * • • mmd im ihmi mmd n3prwal.JL.4aa4 Mali ft.-oj folUmm: TKmi §mid gpyfffaif______A®..Ji_________diUsn of tho UmiUd Statos; of good moraloKarmeUr m4 ripiftli; oa4 J# J - .. atfainod ihs ago of tl ^gomro; ihai - ^ S propriotor of tko gfiainr^-if^^ fw wkiok iko Uoomm will ko immod if IhU appUemHom it gramUd, Tkmi oaU o^Uioal...—laoJa J iJii appiioalion purtuami amd tubjtoi to all iho lawt of iho SUUt of yinnrfrfa oa4 iko irJininMi amd rogulmtiamo of tmid ...^..LAY .. ... mppUoabU ihortiOo wkitk ora korobg mmdo a pmH horooft mmd kortky mgrooA. io obotrvt amd coey iho tamo: Ilidna H Emck oppiicomi fun her stales that by the commencement of busmess amd by Juty / f each succeeding year said mpphcm mi mU hate paid the Federal Special Occupational Taxtothe ^lureau 0/ AtcohoL Tobacco and ^ -farms for a retoH dealer. f. pi r 0.1* SSJ7^ ’'■%VivN' r Interoffice Memo Date: To: From: Re: November 19« 1991 Ron Moorse, City Administrator Stephen X. Sullivan, Chief of Police Liquor License Renewal fi>. fi- K.. r.::r I I': This Department has reviewed all reports within year from the below named establishment. As no violations nil foSnd I recommend the City renew the liquor license. The name of the establishment is: Lakevlew Golf Course 405 North Arm Drive r« I' ■A *!; ;L- I• •• J ‘1 • 1 I I . ’-i ■ ’-.I• i • ■) ■ it.. .1 •. ! .1 . '* « * • .* ( e *#•i 9 * •' !• F • • % . V • ! »<« •• •.. • w *: 4: A'.1 .% N-*. .. j ;i • ".r • •» • •a V-e•.*: ,•. • * •• O ' l^- •;• 'K'.■i o . : I-.:•1 ie •*. |A ■// Forw No. 23>» ApfftroilM lot IlHtff tirtotf f» MWoo-ioitlrtit Man IJ^oor **tlN** fremitr*. <to n •«> RETAIL “ON SALE” ot iHiime{(ota, covxtr or . JtUnnAfjn^.____ To the.......CoMoc.i I. .................of the $75.00 Jil ______or.... Or!)*i.Q,______ . .Cl ... ...... of __Q.K.9.K1.9............ State of Minnesota : .cS-CAJvi:__/L™..l^)..*»x.k>.U.c-rk'__. htnhy appl t e^for a Ueenm for fho Urm of^__^Ooe^ .J^C^C-_____ from iho------------------ _______dap of......... ...............................------, ;p .f 2*. to mil At Retail Onlyt Non*Intozicatinf Malt Liquors, IS# #ssis or# by law, far eanstLmpiion *VX* iho$$ certain prcmUee In ths ----------------------------------____________of ___._^.o.n.a ........... ^mariked as foUoam,^.PS__r ...OXL^ C. mi echieK plmss mid myylismni—spera*s ^^.ihs husinsm of— suit Is ihmi sad r§prmen$,^. .amd Hais^^ms /oltaw§: nsi said myyilmmi------------------Ut---------sUUen.....sf iMs Oniisd States; of good moral choral m4 repute; mmd hm.S.—aiiainsd the age of Ml years; that -----------AP i4%..............^ proprietor ^. of the #glsl l<#fc m#i it far whisk the lisente wiU le iemsd if tPUe application it gt anted. Thai nam^wefaeiurer of tush nondnioHeatUig mali Uqusre has any ownerthip, in whole or in part, li# said businem of said appiimnt —or any intsreet therein; That sold mppUeani —makoA^ihie applUaUon pursuant and eubieet to all the laws of the SiaU of Mimneeoiu and the ordinans te and rsgulaiUmt of told_________________________________________ mppUeabls thereto, mkUh ar§ hereby made a pari hereof, and hereby agree —to observe and obey the earns; —..... mi iCW OF Fwmx Of FIC£miumc01 cm 75.0C CHECH n. 75.0C/ifaiPT'ime rou 0227820 cool Mi T12 ‘-Each oppikont further states thai by the commencement of business and by July / of each succetaint year said 11/04/ oppikont wm huso paid the Federal Special Occupational Tax to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms for a reteii dealer. IdzJL^., jp.*U r. 0. Jddrm»J7j.O.... Pi... S>*or <. Of. _____________ft)ounA ^ SSi<0*f 1 • « . .% * I' ' .V ■ 5 ■ ■■ I .. . \ I. •Vil't !• ; I> • • r r a '» » r h • • ^ • a ♦ .. » ;i i rt : T.-r • • • ■ ■n COUNCIL MEETING NOV J 5 1991 CITYOFORONO 11/10/91 PR CB PRREQOR 113 NAME DPT P R ANDERSON. BRUCE L BOBZIEN, SUE A BOSHA. TAMIE L BRINKHAUS, JOHN F CHESWICK. GARY B CORNICK, JAMES L DEMBOUSKI, JAY C ENGLISH III. IRVING ERICKSON, KURT R FISCHENICK, DAN T FRITZLER. JOHN M GAFFRON, MICHAEL GERHARDSON. JOHN GOMAN. DAVID J GREGORY. JAMES D HALLIN, DOROTHY M HANSEN, STEVEN C HANSING, CAROL J HASEMAN, CAROLE JOHNSON. BRADLEY P KENNEN, JANICE M KNUTSON. CHARLOTTE A KUEHN, THOMAS H MABUSTH, JEANNE A MOORSE. RONALD J MOROWCZYNSKI. JAMES NELSON, DAVID D OBERAIGNER, SCOTT G OBRIEN. RANDY L OMAN. LYLE E PALMER, GREGORY A OUAST, WAYNE A RATHBUN, BARRY J SKREEN. DALE S STEFFENHAGEN. RONALD SULLIVAN. STEPHEN X THOMTON, MARK K TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE F TOMCZYK, MARK W VANG. BRUCE L VEE, LINDA S WALTERS. LINDA 0 WECKMAN. STEPHEN J 31 31 12 42 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 33 42 35 42 12 42 31 12 31 31 15 15 33 12 31 35 42 92 33 42 92 92 42 93 31 31 31 31 33 12 15 33 YTD CURRENT GROSS GROSS 40217.54 1620.85 22109.32 958.72 13237 54 515 i6 34991.15 1522.8 37880.00 1648.( 40222.58 1640 « 17040.21 1107.!» 38713.77 1746.5., 34217.41 1522.41 38261.*3 1546.84 36578.17 1599 04 31989.46 1392 24 45016.79 2240.03 1487.71 143.21 31434 40 2038.90 27555.86 1199 28 26105.23 1798 91 12590 42 524 63 3667.33 814.96 37106 61 1454.24 1692.66 218.85 22028.40 958.72 46999.52 2048.08 40732.78 1743.52 9772.80 2238.40 37845 82 1626 94 4196 67 171 85 22805 55 1482.70 27195 08 1724.14 32223 76 1392.23 23255.44 1456.77 31785.52 1533.01 27285.85 1887.30 26932.72 1775. 1 27594 27 1200 96 11307.36 1884 56 33961 69 1426 48 37281 87 1512 06 34404 43 1563 31 27047.24 1109.27 19504.35 862.89 25151.64 1111.92 21335 56 1000.72 59,054.99 1991 CITY Of ORONO H^ CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT HC9997 HCI967 HCI967 HCI997 HC9967 HCI9C7 HCI967 HC9997 HC9967 HC9997 HCI967 HC999I HCI99I HC996I HCI96I 11/06/91 11/06/91 11/06/91 11/09/91 11/06/91 11/06/91 11/06/91 11/06/91 11/06/91 11/06/91 11/06/91 11/06/91 11/06/91 11/06/91 11/06/91 CHECK REGISTERVENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV 10-31-91 • P O. • 422 302. 66. 126. 32. 494. 24. 674. 114. 171. 162. 2.593. 53 54 96 77 16 70 48 95 61 91 09 70 17.57 8.01 151.32 2.69 179.59 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL HINNEQASCO HINNEGASCO HINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO riCA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA 9-29 9-29 9-29 9/29 9-29 9-29 9-29 9-29 9-29 9-29 9-29 UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 72- 4142 73- 4142 74- 4*42 -039-12 -069-15 -111-31 -115-31 -121-31 -174-33 -185-35 -249-42-549-01 -1159-92 -590-93 Oi-4324-099-17 01-4324-129 31 72- 4324-549-91 73- 4324-569-92 PAGE 1MESSAGE' MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANU. ' MANUA. MANUAL MANUAL HC8969 11/06/91 128.59 POSTMASTER SW/WTR BILLS 72-4'’?l-54«-91 MANUAL HCI969 11/06/91 192.89 321.48 t POSTMASTER SW/WTR BILLS 73-4j21-56j 92 MANUAL HC8970 11/06/91 150.00 150.00 • GOVT TRAINING CONF 01-4356-129-31 MANUAL HC9971 11/06/91 96.90 1ST NATL FICA 10-3 01-4142-020-11 MANUAL HC8971 11/09/91 406.87 1ST NATL FICA 10-3 01-4142-039-12 MANUAL HCS971 11/06/91 302.54 1ST NATL FICA 10-3 01-4142-069-15 MANUAL HCI971 11/06/91 66.93 1ST NATL FICA 10-3 01-4142-111-31 MANUAL HCI971 11/06/91 124.53 1ST NATL FICA 10-3 01-4142-115-31 MANUAL HC9971 11/06/91 21.19 1ST NATL FICA 10-3 01-4142-121-31 MANUAL HCI971 11/06/91 494.70 1ST NATL FICA :c-3 01-4142-174-33 MANUAL HC8971 11/06/91 25.56 1ST NATL FICA l(>-3 01-4142-185-35 MANUAL HC8971 11/06/91 6r/.38 1ST NATL FIC^*. 5 0-J 01-4142-249-42 MANUAL HC8971 11/06/91 104.33 1ST NATL ftcp'. :o-3 72-4142-549-91 MANUAL HC8971 11/06/91 156.49 1ST NATL * *LA JO-3 73-4142-569-92 MANUAL HC89''*11/06/91 145 72 2.613.14 A 1ST NATL * ICA iO-3 74-4142-590-93 MANUAL HCI972 11/06/91 27.49 27.49 81 ERICKSON BAKE C;.Kc r.ECEPT 01-4382-020-11 MANUAL HCI973 11/06/91 25.00 25.00 • COMP WORTH SEMINAR CONF 01-4356-039-12 MANUAL HC8974 11/06/91 1.379.55 SAFE BEN KOV FEE 01-1050-000-00 MANUAL HC8974 11/06/91 143.00 1,522.55 t SAFE BEN FEE 01-4306-299-72 MANUAL HC897S 11/06/91 40.00 40.00 • GOVT TRAINING SEMINAR 01-4356-174-33 MANUAL HC8976 11/06/91 29.99 29.99 EGGHEAD SOFT MSDOS TUTOR 01-4210-069-15 MANUAL j1091 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE HCI977 HCI97I HCI07I HCI97I HCI97I HCI97I HCI979 HCI97I HCI07I HCI07I HCI07I HCI979 HCI079 MC9979 HC9979 HCI979 HC9979 HC9979 HC9979NC9979 NC9979 HC9979 HC9979 HC9979 HCI979 HCI979 HC9979 NCI979 HC9979 HC9979 HC9979 HC9979 HC9979 HCI979 NCI979 NC9979 HC9979 NC9979 HC9979 HC9979 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/06/91 11/06/91 11/09/91 11/06/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 11/09/91 AMOUNT 7.06 7.06 • 1.507.00 672.00 462.00 294.00 420.32 966.16 371.00 1.155.00 210.00 315.00 9,379.41 406.86 406.86- 302.54- 302.54 97.39 67.39- 129.79 126.76- 25.12- 2*. 12 511.72 511.72- 27.59- 27.59 702.34 702.34- 406.89 302.54 67.39 129.79 25.12 511.72 27.59 702.34 121.90- check REGISTERVENDOR SAFE BEN MEDIA MEDIA MEDIA MEDIA MEDIA MEDIA MEDIA MEDIA MEDIA MEDIA 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST mail 1 NATL ISr NATL 1ST NATt 1ST NA 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL ITEM DESCRIPTION SPECIAL BILLING NOV INS NOV INS NOV INS NOV INS NOV INS NOV INS NOV INS NOV INS NOV INS NOV INS FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA FICA 10-27 10-27 10-27 10-27 10-27 10-27 10-27 10-27 10-27 10-27 10-27 10-27 10-27 10-27 10-27 10-27 10-27 10-27 10-27 10-27 10-27 10-27 10-27 FICA 10-27 FICA 10-27 ACCOUNT NO. INV 01-1050-000-00 01-3872 01-4151 01-4151 01-4151 01-4151 01-4151 01-4151 01-4151 72- 4151 73- 4151 000-00 039-12 069-15 121-31 126-31 129-31 174-33 249-42 549-91 569-92 121.90 1ST NATL FICA 10-27121.90 1ST NATL FICA 10-27182.85 1ST NATL FICA 10-27125.02 2,600.09 •1ST NATL FICA 10-27 14,204.16 FUND 01 TOTAL GENERAL FUND830.75 FUND 72 TOTAL WATER OPERATING FUND 1,021.13 FUND 73 TOTAL SEWER OPERATING FUND432.83 FUND 74 TOTAL GOLF COURSE OPERATING FD 19.499.57 TOTAL 01-4120- 01-4120- 01-4120- 01-4120- 01-4120- 01-4120- 01-4120- 01-4120- 01-4120- 01-4120- 01-4120- 01-4120- 01-4120- 01-4120- 01-4120- 01-4120- 01-4142- 01-4142- 01-4142- 01-4142- 01-4142- 01-4142- 01-4142- 01-4142 72-4120 72-4120 72- 4142 73- 4142 74- 4142 039-12 039-12 069-15 -069-15 -111-31 -111-31 -115-31 -115-31 -121-31 -121-31 -174-33 -174-33 -185-35 -185-35 -249-42 -249-42 -039-12 -069-15 -111-31 -115-31 -121-31 -174-33 -185-35 -249-42 -549-91 -549-91 -549-91 -569-92 -590-93 10-31-91 PAGE 2 I P.O 8 MESSAGE MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL •••-CKS it: ■. • 11991 CITY OF 090N0 CHECK NO. DATE 929011 929091 11/19/91 11/19/91 AMOUNT lei 34 12.61 173.9S CHECK REGISTERVENDOR BLACKS PHOTOGRAPHY BLACKS PHOTOGRAPHY ITEM DESCRIPTION PHOTO REFINSH PHOTO REFINSH ACCOUNT NO. INV 01-4210-129-31 01-4210-174-33 11-25-91 PAGE I • P.O 9 MESSAGE ‘ 929031 11/19/91 4 32 4.32 • AT A T COMM TELEPHONE 01-4320-175-34 •••-CKS 329034 11/19/91 353.39 353.39 * ANCHOR PAPER COPY PAPER 01-1261-000-00 • • • .CKS 329049 11/19/91 25.00 25.00 •ASSN METRO MUNICIPS MTG 01-4356-039-12 • • • .CKS 329070 329070 329070 329070 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 21,570.95 1.131.50 2,121.75 1,629.92 29,491.12 BOARMAN A ASSOCIATES BOARMAN A ASSOCIATES BOARMAN A ASSOCIATES BOARMAN A ASSOCIATES PUB WKS BDG/SITE FEE CITY HALL DESIGN PUBLIC WKS DESIGN PUB WKS REIM EXP 15-4306-651-00 15-4306-651-00 15-4306-651-00 15-4399-651-00 -CKS •••-CKS 329074 329074 329074 329074 329074 329074 329074 329074 329074 329074 329074 329074 329074 329074 929074 329074 329074 329015 329095 329095 11/19/91 11.IS BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ZONING MAPS 01-4210-174-3311/19/91 11.02 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN STREET MAPS 01-4210-249-4211/19/91 100.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ENG RETAINER SEPT 01-4304-200-4111/19/91 165.00 ' NESTROO ROSENE ASN REVIEWS PERMITS 01-4305-174-3311/19/91 150.00 TNESTROO ROSENE ASN PROJECT REVIEW JULY 01-4305-200-4111/19/91 150.00 NIESTROO ROSENE ASN WYLDHURST DRAINAGE 01-4305-249-4211/19/91 337 50 I.3NESTR00 ROSENE ASN DOT TH12 SAFETY IMP 01-4305-299-7211/19/91 450.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN WOODHILL CC SEWER 01-4305-940-7111/19/91 75.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN APPLIC JUNE 01-4305-940-7111/19/91 1,379.91 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ENG APPLICATIONS 01-4305-940-7111/19/91 A A A A A A 1,530.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ENG GRAD/SURVEY 15-4305-651-0011/19/91 369.71 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ENG MCCULLY RO 23-4305-354-0011/19/91 3,560.33 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN STUBBS BAY SWR REPRT 24-4305-408-0011/19/91 975.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN WTR TOWER APPLIC 72-4305-439-9611/19/91 175.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN PMPHSEI3 INSP SEPT 72-4306-437-9511/19/91 130.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN LS911 ENG JULY 73-4531-569-9111/19/91 775.00 10,345.35 •BONESTROO ROSENE ASN INSP LSill SEPT 73-4531-569-92 11/19/91 4 38 BUDGET PRINTING POSTAGE 01-4321-129-3111/19/91 8.67 BUDGET PRINTING POSTAGE 01-4321-129-3111/19/91 169.29 112.34 •BUDGET PRINTING REPORTS 01-4322-129-31 ii N t -CKS •••-CKS .1991 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTERCHECK NO . DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV 329091 11/19/91 4.277.26 CARGILL SALT ROAD SALT 01-4233-249-42 4,277.26ft 329130 11/19/91 65.16 COLONIAL LIFE INS CO NOV INS 01-4152-121-31 329130 11/19/91 .01 COLONIAL LIFE INS CO NOV INS 01-4152-126-31 329130 11/19/91 200.15 COLONIAL LIFE INS CO NOV INS 01-4152-129-31 271.32ft 329142 11/19/91 205.00 COPY DUP PR INC RENTAL 01-4210-129-31 205.00ft 329154 11/19/91 253 20 CVS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS 01-4221-128-3132915411/19/91 19.00 CYS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS 01-4221-129-3132915411/19/91 131.80 CYS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS 01-4221-129-31404.00 ft 329157 11/19/91 950.00 DAHLGREN SHARDLOW PARK PLANNING 12-4306-385-00 950.00H 329184 11/19/91 64.41 DAY TIMERS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-129-3164.41 ft 329212 11/19/91 11.25 EXPRESS MESSENGER POSTAGE 01-4321-174-3311.25 ft 329256 11/19/91 355.33 GENUINE PARTS CO PARTS 01-4232-249-4232925911/19/91 30.16 GENUINE PARTS CO PARTS 72-4234-549-91 329259 11/19/91 9.36 GENUINE PARTS CO PARTS 73-4234-569-92 394.15ft 329258 11/19/91 24.70 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD WATER 01-4231-099-1724.70ft 329272 296.84 Q «. K SERVICES UNIFORMS 01-4221-249-4232927211/19/91 14.58 Q A K SERVICES MATS 01-4231-129-3132927211/19/91 55.04 OAK SERVICES UNIFORMS 73-4221-569-92 11-25-91 PAGE •••-CKS ^•lk -CKS •**-CKS •••-CKS II II n -CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS -CKS •••-CKS f* •1991 CITY OF 090N0 CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV 329272 11/19/91 9 36 415.80 ft G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS 74-4221-590-93 32927S 11/19/91 210.16 GROUP HEALTH INC DEC INS 01-4151-121-31 329275 11/19/91 420.32 GROUP HEALTH INC DEC INS 01-4151-126-31 329275 11/19/91 466.64 GROUP HEALTH INC DEC INS 01-4151-129-31 329275 11/19/91 117.82 GROUP HEALTH INC DEC INS 01-4151-174-33 329275 11/19/91 231.00 1,445.94 ft GROUP HEALTH INC DEC INS 74-4151-590-93 329279 11/19/91 65.00 GOPHER STATE ONECALL OCT FEE 72-4306-5^9-91 329278 11/19/91 97.50 162.50 ft GOPHER STATE ONECALL OCT FEE 73-4306-56L-92 329301 11/19/91 53.01 53.01 ft HENN CTY SHERIFF DPT REPAIR 01-434:-129-31 329340 11/19/91 16.00 MOORSE RON PARKING OCT 01 -4381-039-12 329340 11/19/91 5.00 MOORSE RON PARKING SEPT 01-4381-039-12 329340 11/19/91 30.25 51.25 ft MOORSE RON MTG EXP OCT 01-4382-039-12 329370 11/19/91 441.70 441.70 ft JIM HATCH SALES CO CHAINS/HOOKS 01-4;’32-249-42 329377 11/19/91 14.96 14.96 ft JOHNSON/BRADLEY CLASS 01-4356-129-31 329395 11/19/91 6.95 6.95 ft KOEHNENS STANDARD PART 01-4341-129-31 329435 11/19/91 23.23 LOQIS - SUITE 300 LABELS COSGROVE 01-3500-000-00 329435 11/19/91 23.23 LOQIS - SUITE 300 LABELS 01-4210-295-65 329435 11/19/91 791.11 LOOIS - SUITE 300 LOQIS APPL SUPP OCT 01-4352-069-15 329435 11/19/91 458.60 LOQIS - SUITE 300 LOQIS APPL SUPP OCT 01-4352-129-31 329435 11/19/91 240.77 LOGIS - SUITE 300 LOGIS APPL SUPP OCT 01-4352-174-33 329435 11/19/91 34.63 LOOIS - SUITE 300 COURIER SEPT 01-4353-069-1532943511/19/91 10.00 LOQIS - SUITE 300 DATA PROC OCT 01-4355-039-12 329435 11/19/91 448.37 LOGIS - SUITE 300 DATA PROC OCT 01-4355-069-15 11-25-91 PAGE •••-CKS H • ft -CKS •'•-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS ■••-CKS •■•-CKS 1991 CITY OF 090NO CHECK NO. DATE CHECK REGISTER 32943S 32943S 329435 329435 329435 329435 329435 329435 329439 329441 329492 329497 329497 329497 329497 329474 32947*. 32947r 329477 329477 329477 329477 329477 329477 329477 329477 329477 329477 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 AHOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 10.957.00 10.957.00 • METRO WASTE DEC FEE 99.55 29.55 1.05 29.59 29.59 19.09 29.59 17.97 29.34 29.59 1.05 29.59 305.09 MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS PROD PROD PROD PROD PROD PROD PROD PROD PROD PROD PROD PROD OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES ACCOUNT NO. INV 11/19/91 787.82 LOQIS - SUITE 300 DATA PROC OCT 01-4355-129-3111/19/91 310.37 LOQIS - SUITE 300 DATA PROC OCT 01-4355-174-3311/19/91 144.46 LOQIS - SUITE 300 LOQIS APPL SUPP OCT 72-4352-549-9111/19/91 7,210.10-LOQIS - SUITE 300 DATA PROC OCT 72-4355-549-9111/19/91 06.53 LOGIS - SUITE 300 DATA PROC OCT 72-4355-549-9111/19/91 7,210.10 LOGIS - SUITE 300 DATA PROC OCT 72-4355-549-9111/19/91 337.07 LOGIS - SUITE 300 LOQIS APPL SUPP OCT 73-4352-569-9211/19/91 297.20 LOGIS - SUITE 300 DATA PROC OCT 73-4355-599-923,973.39 • 11/19/91 9.39 LONG LK FORD TRACTOR PARTS 01-4232-249-429.39 • 11/19/91 90.00 LONG LAKE TIRE SERV MOUNT TIRES 73-4341-599-9290.00 • 11/19/91 1,353.52 MARTINS NAVARRE 69 AUTO REPAIR 01-4341-129-311,353.52 • 120.00 MED CTR HEALTH CARE DEC INS 01-4151-069-15240.00 MED CTR HEALTH CARE DEC INS 01-4151-129-31492.00 MED CTR HEALTH CARE DEC INS 01-4151-174-33351.00 MED CTR HEALTH CARE DEC INS 01-4151-249-42 73-1292-000-00 01-4210 01-4210 01-4210 01-4210 01-4210 01-4210 01-4210 01-4210 01-««.^0 01-4210 01-4210 01-4210 039-12 039-12 059-14 059-14 099-15 099-15 129-31 129-31 174-33 174-33 249-42 249-42 11-25-91 PAGE 4 9 P 0 9 MESSAGE •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS -CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS 1891 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE 329410 32948S 329S32 329545 329545 329549 329549329549 329549 329549 32954e 329549 329549 329549 329549 329549 329549 329562 329597 329599 329902 - - - ii/iO/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/81 11/19/9111/19/91 11/19/9111/19/91 11/19/81 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/18/91 11/19/81 11/19/91 11/19/91 AMOUNT 1.271.16 • CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 11-25-91 PAGE 5 % ACCOUNT NO. INV. i P 0 • MESSAGE 934.01 MIDWEST ASPHALT ASPHALT 01-4233-249-42 934.01 * 13.50 MPLS OXYGEN CO DEMURRAGE 01-4232-129-31 13.50 • 119.00 MOROWCZYNSKl/JAMES Uniform 01-4221-129-31 119.00 • 1.91 NAVARRE AUTO REPAIR PART 01-4341-129-31 113.83 NAVARRE AUTO REPAIR TRUCK REPAIR 01-4341-174-33 115.74 • 6.90 NAVARRE HARDWARE SUPPLIES 01-4210-129-31 25.11 NAVARRE HARDWARE SUPPLIES 01-4210-174-33 12.94 NAVARRE HARDWARE SUPPLIES 01-4231-099-17 10.36 NAVARRE HARDWARE SUPPLIES 01-4231-290-61 5.08 NAVARRE HARDWARE SUPPLIES 01-4232-099-17 174.18 NAVARRE HARDWARE SUPPLIES 01-4232-249-42 21.83 NAVARRE HARDWARE SUPPLIES 01-4348-295-85 4.18 NAVARRE HARDWARE SUPPLIES 72-4232-549-91 46.98 NAVARRE HARDWARE SUPPLIES 72-4234-549-91 12.08 NAVARRE HARDWARE SUPPLIES 73-4232-569-92 22.34 NAVARRE HARDWARE SUPPLIES 73-4234-569-92 44.12 NAVARRE HARDWARE SUPPLIES 74-4232-590-93 386.10 • 9.54 NSP UTILITIES 73-4324-569-92 9.54 • .266.61 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 10/28-11/10 01-2031-000-00 .266.61 • 12.00 PERA INS DEC INS 01-4152-129-31 12.00 • .271.16 PAPER CALMENSON 4 CO BLADES 01-4232-249-42 •**-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS • • (-CKS • « >-CKS •••-CKS • r. a -CKS a a a -CKS 1991 CITY OF 090N0 CHECK NO. DATE 329913 329613 329913 329915 329927 329991 329975 329996 329719 329719 ‘ V is- 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 789.25 933.20 42.00 1.491.45 • PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR REPAIRS REPAIRS REPAIRS 8.90 8.90 * PERRYS VENTURES INC WASH 205.00 205.00 • PITNEY BOWES HAINT AQHT 92 315.00 315.00 • REO RAJ KENNELS IMPOUND FEE 2,093.80 2,093.80 • ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 2.777.50 2.777.50 • SR CMNTY SERVICES 4TH OTR 35.00 9.62 44.62 • DIXIE PETRO-CHEM DIXIE PETRO-CHEM DEMURRANGE ACID . \ .»11-25-91 PAGE 6 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 8 P.O. • MESSAGE 01-4341-129-31 01-4341-185-35 01-4341-249-42 73-4341-569-92 01-1299-000-00 01-4360-185-35 01-1260-000-00 01-4385-100-21 72-4234-549-91 72-4234-549-91 329740 11/19/91 109.80 STRETCHERS EQUIPMENT 01-4232-129-31 329740 11/19/91 64.95 STREICHERS LIGHTS 01-4232-185-35 329740 11/19/91 3.50 STREICHERS POSTAGE 01-4321-129-31 329740 11/19/91 10.00 185.25 • STREICHERS REPAIR 01-4342-129-31 329741 11/19/91 5.35 5.35 • DEMBOUSKI/JAY CLASS 01-4358-129-31 329742 11/19/91 2.945.58 2.945.58 • STRGAR ROSCOE FAUSCH HWY 12 STUDY OCT 01-4309-299-72 329752 11/19/91 982.80 682.80 • SUBURBAN TIRE INC RODDER TIRES 73-4342-569-92 •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS -CKS -CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS -CKS \1991 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE 329775 329775 329712329712 329792 329796 329796 329115 329915329915 329915 329915 329921 329921 329935 329940 329942 329945 AHOUNT CHECK REGISTERVENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ■ ]11-25-91 PAGE 7 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 9 P.O. I MESSAGE 11/19/91 11/19/91 505.00 200.00 705.00 • TOWN A COUNTRY TOWN 4 COUNTRY NOV FEE NOV FEE 01-4343-099-17 01-4343-129-31 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 9.11- 9.11 9.11 9.11 • TOMCZYK/MARK TOMCZYK/MARK TOMCZYK/MARK CLASS CLASS CLASS 01-4351-129-31 01-4351-129-31 01-4356-129-31 11/19/91 11/19/91 44.50 62.95 107 45 • UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UNIFORM 01-4221-129-31 01-4221-129-31 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 11/19/91 45.94 29 62 27.41 22.42 33.22 158.61 • US WETT COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN TELEPHONE TELEPHONE DATA PROC DATA PROC DATA PROC 01-4320-129-31 01-4320-249-42 01-4355-069-15 72- 4355-549-91 73- 4355-589-92 11/19/91 11/19/91 9.99 164.54 174.53 • VILLAGE CHEVROLET VILLAGE CHEVROLET PARTS PARTS 01-4232-249-42 73-4341-569-92 11/19/91 93.00 93.00 • WARNING LITES OF MN FLASHERS 01-4331-249-42 11/19/91 90.00 90.00 • WAYZATA AUTO SERV PARTS 01-4232-249-42 11/19/91 2.258.20 2.258.20 ‘ WAYZATA-CITY OF 3RD QTR WTR 72-2224-000-00 11/19/91 5.98 5.98 • WECKMAN STEPHEN MILEAGE 01-4381-174-33 •••-CKS • ••CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS -CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS ■ • * -CKS t«91 CITY OF 060NO CHECK REGISTERCHECK NO.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV32916611/19/91 486.00 486.00 ft WIDMER BROS REPAIR BREAK 72-4345-549-91 329695 11/19/91 103.46 103.46 ft ZIEGLER INC PARTS 01-4232-249-42 32990 a 11/19/91 64.00 64.00 ft ASHRAE INC STANDARDS 01-4240-174-33 329902 11/19/91 115.20 115.20 ft CLEMENT BIRCH REFUND PEk.,IT FEE 01-3131-000-00 329903 11/19/91 220.00 220.00 ft GRAF IX SHOPPE LETTER CSO CAR 01-4341-165-35 329904 11/19/91 396.25 396.25 ft LASER LABS INC 2 TINT METERS 01-4560-129-31 329905 11/19/91 312.75 312.75 ft NATL FIRE CODES FIRE ''-OEb 01-4240-174-33 329906 11/19/91 30.590.00 30.590.00 ft NORTHWEST MECHANICAL LSill PYMT 1 73-4531-569-92 329907 11/19/91 2.416.46 2.416.46 ft ORONO COMMUNITY ED SUPMER REC PROG 01-4357-290-61 329906 11/19/91 174.16 174.16 ft tNTOXIMETERS INC REPAIR SENSOR 01-4342-129-31 329909 11/19/91 643.50 643.50 ft METRO WASTE SAC CHARGE 01-2226-000-00 329910 11/19/10.00 10.00 ft MN C0P9CRCE DEPT NOTARY FEE 01-4363-039-12 329911 11/19/91 83.00 63.00 ft U OF MINNESOTA SEMINAR 01-4356-174-33 11-25-91 PAGC 39.927.57 FUND 01 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 950.00 FUND 12 TOTAL PARK FUND 27.991.12 FUND 15 TOTAL BUILDNQ CAPITAL OUTLAY F 369.71 FUND 23 TOTAL MUNIC STATE AID CONS FUN 3,560.33 FUND 24 TOTAL PERM IMPROVE REVOLVING F 4,346.55 FUND 72 TOTAL WATER OPERATING FUND 44,241.59 FUND 73 TOTAL SEWER OPERATING FUND 264.46 FUND 74 TOTAL GOLF COURSE OPERATING FO 121,673.35 TOTAL -CKS ft A •-CKS ft ft ft .CKS u f I'l III —1ii Li;k r\ Cl 1 COUNCIL MEETING NOV 2 5 199! CITY OF ORONO /* >. / . *• • • WftiiiiHgIfrI •* |y/\r r\^ , . \ i »’ ^c.- ;v ' * • .* •-.••• 4. .^. « A-«'' .. fc. • •l" > • ^ . • • . •* . . . • -.* A.*. • *.■ • - •. v* * ' ' * ^ * - • • » !*. • • I* N% * \# U. > •* « • r 7.« %*■ r .• • • COUNCIL MEETING 2»oo i.o>«viEW c'inn.E ^ ® L«.>G I^KE. MTVXE.SOTA 5r>356 f Ijy Qp QRONO t ■c^Cc^ oU<.£^ . a-ci-ec^y . I; * »' ‘ IJOV 1 e 1991 E,- i ..fi-- ■i Jj.crtcfC’C'O ^^ r I ^ . I i Ll' •. COUNCIL MEETINGNOV 2 5 19«Joseph C. DeMeo 400 Oxford RoadpPTV OF HlOWfl inesota 553o6Long Lake, Minnesota 553; :m 21 m\ N 'vember 19, 1991 Orono City Council City Hall 1335 South Brown Road Orono, Minnesota Dear Chairman: 1 am writing this letter to state my position on the current proposal for a sewage system in our area. First and foremost, I w:«it to refute the idea that there has been a letter from me requesting the sewage system to proceed. Second, I wish to state that the cur^nt proposal is both unnecessary and unsound Inancially for me and others in our area own situation has been handled as needed which your inspections and records should verify. Any problems that do arise I have the necessary prcferty and means to handle the situation and my plan is to do so. I trusc this makes my position clear. If anyone wishes to discuss this with me, I will be glad to do so. KiSiiidiiiaiiluii i' • Lita. ‘■'IP ^________; uov Z '\ 1931 185 Bederw'ood Drive, Long Lake, Mn 55356. November 18th 1991. Reference: Public Hearing Of Municipal Sewers - Stubbs Bay Area (. .'I jno Council Member.^ With respect to the above public hearing, I will not be able to attend due to business commitments out of state. However, by this letter I would like to make my opinion known first hand, rather than by tl".-^ add-hoc co: :mittee, who did not express accurately the feelings of the the rr»ajonty of th» people impacted t'/ this project. As this letter will be delivered by registered i ail, I fully expect it to 1^ read out at the meeting, and minuted accordingly. In the flyer you distributed, you refer to the questionn^'^e sent out in Julv 1990. However, you omit to reference the excellent rep^^. "Stubbs Bay Alternative Waste Management Study" which accomr' d it. This report as you are fully aware, enters into specific and detailed nnation on each residence, and each mdividual area. Unfortunately, the report is a little on the technical side and could be confusing to tiiose who are not exposed to such writings. This may be the reason why 50% did not respond originally. The question this begs is, why did the council representative for the Stubbs area not participate and explain the report to the people directly impacted? Incidently, who is the council representative for the Sb’^’n ; Biy area? Fror» your flyer you clearly state the council were unanimous in their L vote on this project therefore, our representative is clearly casting a personal vote, not one based on the populations opinion. If we now revert back to the "Stubbs Bay Alternative Waste Management Study" I would like to quote: IV Conclusions: ”5o% of the properties surveyed appear to have substantially adequate areas available for any future repairs for permanent usage of current septic systems, if and when necessary" If this report is to be considered technically accurate, why are we going through ♦'hese procedures when the report clearly states there are alternativ^e solutions to the three (3) areas which constitute the remaining 50%. With respect to these three (3) areas, I would like quote from the report again. pagg-I6 "Only 28% have systems that would not be able to meet the minimum code standard, and 22% are considered questionable to severely limited" These points, and ones which related specifically to itemized costs for the alternative solutions, recommended in u • Stubbs Bay Alternative Waste Management Study" were made to Mr Bemhardson,(see letter dated August 12th 1990) who was going to acquire this information, but did not! Factual communications in the council are clearly not a strong suite. This is again evident in your recent flyer, where your unwillingness to commit to hard facts which impact people greatly can be seen. Why have the committee not yet made a final determination of what would trigger future lateral installations? As the costs vary from $4,540 (min) to $12,730 (max), I think the public would like to know your position on this. Or is it a case of, trust me! For your reference, I have roughly calculated the costs of the average sum mgsmsm bas6d on your data, which means some will pay more than this and some less if this proposal is accepted. Average Cost = $17,096 If this sum were to be assessed over a fifteen year period, at the original rate you quoted in 1990 (8.5%), then the average cost to each household would be: Rough Sum Average = $44,450 Baring in mind that the average house in the area cost roughly $120,000 how do you justify this? We are currently in a deep recession, yet the Orono council want to increase our taxes by 32%. The threat of Hwyl2 taking the southern most route is very strong, which will reduce the saleable value of many houses, thus reducing the average value even lower. I feel strongly that the Orono council do not hold the well being of the Stubbs Bay community in the correct perspective, therefore, I would like direct answers to the following questions: 1. Why are the Orono council persisting with this project when greater than 75% of the current properties can meet or exceed the minimum code levels? 2. What is the Orono councils position 'f the majority of the residence reject this current proposal? 3. Wh:: are the residence legal writes of appealing this proposal when there properties meet, or exceed the minimum code requirements? 4. Why are properties immediately north of the Luce Line excluded from this proposal? 5. What action would Orono council take if property owners cannot make these proposed payments? 6. Why will Orono council, not consider, the alternative solutions recommend in the "Stubbs Bay Alternative Waste Study" ^rhich impact the community with considerable less financial burdens? These questions are all relevant, and need to be answered to the general public. Therefore, in my absence, I trust you will display the integrity required by good manners, and read this letter aloud to the audience at the public meeting. Yours faithfully. r/J. Souter. ftTF^CA., /ilHYC'J. citomd cirV l-h^LL > m PficJexT • • 1^)4'Vi)f^ OOijQ^ LPdc^f mKJ 0>e'Z- I S', (9^1 I C.T -• c : : LlUd £; J • iOV 2 1 We U\/FOtJ qj(Fb/^o (Id. td ouo- f^e if^‘ ClvO€^ I'r^ pmrrCT of ntF AriC^te Qlf\rVriOK^ QtwPOS67> Seu/eti U/^ Do Mor WAatt0(y/^ (/\/CLwD^ /A/ T>yt Scujgfi, ' 0) /j^ ofTH^ CsDTS i^j ?f\tar ^ of OKft)l^^ p/zy^O“ Ai2e ca; two Tfe THfUr-^ Ac/26^/fA/0 ByCiSJhi fivoA\ Trt^ P^O^(aG^/^^FAr73 ^ (;2?) Jvsr 'Bc^AHJSr <^vn~ An^ oa/ Not SP^(S fo(^ I^QfJJS^V)AJ, W^fh^ \/i^\FV TH^U(jtf A- 1/A<^^TVo^ /ki^C/B’ THrTr No U/AT^ QuAU rv SnT)/es 6^=^ i)T//56i S'© THei^e- is /toc<^v A/o BAgT f=ori. Oicn^A/C^ Pfnr . pt Pnotscp^ , (3) Vf^ “7 AP^c>/Ai7^^ Vau ihj Vo\J(^ '’fj/orn'Cr" /A/eet/Dei) i/s /a/ TH^i'n. eWM^Rouc^-KCite TUt'eD TO PW-T7Cff47S. ^) VA;^ 009=" OAJ OUGT^TAf^f^ ,4-€f2^T >4^/0 /fTtl/G* A Doubcje^ yhouAJt) ^^ePTTc fMt^ A^C |2^^v/iil6T) 4/A/TET’'“'?i?*^'CF /A/CLt/0iKi6 ’^C^^^$ /T PVfyiPEl^ ^AST" y^W.. A/t)7~ hhAi/(NP^ MH 92ceCBmS, .. _ri /vy M>TT ^ w 5 tvA5 T?h ,. S//Oce^ TWS synr^^F^ < cam^TJ why PriocjEHt) ^iv^ THir p/zqj^ fvv^ oouMU'L Hi« Coiz/2ecr f^Tf2 -TTHW^Vou R)f2-Vourt. Ti'^e^ (foiiceTW. S//v/ci=uevr, JHer -SMw' • • - - cci CitY ^VOIHlMS?<^.o/c ^r~ 425 Oxford Avenue Orono, Mn. 55356 November 14, 1991 Mayor Barbara Peterson City of Orono 1335 South Brown Road Orono, Mn. 55356 »0V 2 1 1991 Dear Mayor Peterson, I have just received a notice from the City improvements. I will not be present for the meeting so I wish to state my strong objection to the inclusion of my property in the proposed project or assessment area. My property is a two (2) acre*f site that has a septic tank and drain field that is in excellent working order. There is also a site on the property for a mound system in the unlikely event of a problem with the main system. There is no reason to include this property in any sewer improvement as it would be redundant. In these times of increasing tax foi questionable services I object to an assessment for improvement that is unneeded on this site. I believe that the incxusion of my property would be arbitrary and capricious. I believe that tne only reason for the inclusion of properties such as this is to support the construction cost. Without the inclusion or properties that do not need this improvement the project would collapse of its own weight. Please be advised that if the City Council goes forward with this project and includes my property I will institute a legal action to remove it. I would request a copy of the Environmental Impact Report on this project and a Cost-Benefit report if one was prepared. Would you please forward both to the above address if they are available ? I thank you for your consideration of my position. regards^ / Richard Kelly 4oS' OKfoea /2.0 L/Wcc, w M sns"^ tVoi-6'’'^'-?’ Pf'^^'cA-,/iiHYb^i. IS", 1991 Cr!CA,t) CITY w ' * * ** 0(2cA/o, I^VlW. SS2S^ !liOV 2 1 1991 /Vt I^Vfe ^ Qi/FC a/ e^f^/eo (Id . /VA/t> to c ?(//^ iufipm£€^ //i' - C lvOc ^ pm2T\Zr of rm? Act^t^ 'Arpvot^^ OnoPoieJ) SeiN^^lT U/^ po fV/pr WAaJT oufl QTP^rs=T TV BF f NaLvOFt>/A/THF ^cweu■Pr^0■)ec7 ' 10 o^mre 6073 vr f/zy^CT Ai2ie oaj two Tb /K/2eS/^0 //FtxiF CLl/i)^ Fwa TtlF- QfZ^^^o P^tvViflf/^FAiTS (tD JuiT fecAKi^F <ctf2. MiSoiS^ Me OA/ /S /v/or jcv- PfiftPCT- gf^/5 Fb/Z ii^LuSn^, B^FvrtFCeT^ V/FTi-\fV TH<^UC»tf A* l/A<u'^P^ fTTHF /^(J^C/ET T?W Wo vA/ivr^ Qu»^ rv Sn/o/E3 <5/iy i>i/5Cgi So is A/Q GAg/f PfcnrpA/q r>f7fT ^ Pfiocce^ , (3) THh “7 ^po/AJ?^^ You /A/ Vt7v//^ ‘‘f^ornce'* /uFv^ fA/eec/Dej us /^ TT/eila eUFT®OUG-HLte TUie^ TO (W-T7C/r^/t7E. ^) Qvj^ OAJ OUGTrtTTff^f^ fl-€fl€T Ah^O A D ou BLF KKDUAyf) J%^c ^ Ate (2eQv/ifejET) m A^ATFA/?1iCce /A/CC oO|k^t^U/W$ /r PVrvifBl) V/c=VU7 ti /-j Af7'Cr 4^*7^ A^A/ ^ Cs"'' r-i+ywe fteeKJ To«-0 Hr A-ci'rr Co^'^va me^iten. TH t +T ^*"<5 |Tsi4t) U4tr OM.y X77lt=ET'OA/i7'^/?J li/vy rr7VT)THi% lvA5 me /T' ge ;N<ieuie=D , S/A-'ce^ TWy rmreme^T 'S Smiptr csfixseor. u/H f Pf^c c.€HT) ^ I'P* TH^ tcuiou'L TH^ CoP(2ecr )9^«cr 'jTHW'^Vou fbfZ-Yburt. Ti Cgkcj ^tuu S/i^cenevr H P<Vr\iJ~ SMi^ cc: C(tY . I«* «♦ «I w • 'r • ‘i’ ’ f. J-i •'fi !• I;-.’- ik': m •i"' iv^- ^1- ■r m.- S'-Ir / .- S V • ?- ^r' ^ 0<::^ fe;: U/- m- ¥■r ‘ =‘: - I m &■k,,. 'i. p ■• ■ iKvI -S' "■ .~T :-5 j;cTfcrCiJC-O L 1^3 Tf'^kJ LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 'S November 12, 1991 'NOV 1 3 1991 to: from: city Administrators Executive Director Gene Strommen subject:Comment on the First Reading of an Ordinance Relating to Artificial Lights Directed to Lake Minnetonka from Sites on the Lake A growing number of bright lights being directed out lake are resulting in interference with navigation. The LMCD bbafd'of directors has subsequently considered and passed the first reading of an amendment to LMCD Code Section 2.0.. Subd. 1. This amendment would add a section to regulate lights on sites from which artificial lights are directed at the lake. Tb. .-.nd-.nt .pecitically .tat.s that "NO PERSON MAY LOCATE. CONSTRUCT, INSTALL OR MAINTAIN A DOCK AT ANY SITE eeriM UHrm AN AFFIXED. UNSHIEL^JBD ARTIFICIAL LIGHT IS 5wSc?ED AT ip THE LAKE BEYOND THE DOCK USE AREA FOR THAT SITE UNLESS LICENSED BY THE BOARD TO DO SO. The dock uae araa. incidentally, ia that area extending out from the lake shore a distance equal to the width of a ripgrian "kroperty, not to exceed 100 The BoSb recognizes that this ordinance involves sites which may include structures on land from which lighting is affixede The intent of the amendment is to require lice »» of docks, regardless of the number of ' starting with even one slip, if an unshielded arti »cial light is directed at any part of the lake beyond the dock use area" in order to regulate lights beyond the dock use area. LMCD would welcome knowing of each city s manner of addressing lake lignting concerns. 0"® response to this proposed LMCD code amendment f®*" all cities to adopt a uniform ordinance regulating lights SirecUi on the like from a structure on shore to prevent the illumination beyond the dock use area, or comparable area where e dock may not be involved. ;i:::*ry ‘r ?s.":::k'prJ!:.dxng ‘?h: D".rurrr ; .’‘S.t".r'"‘rurturi:, •tic ct LHCD Board U k:' U’ t . K • i-- fe-.iff ?: \c 1.' f f l> ■^^Vfr:--- I #{'7'. T'r..:'- I <! :■■'>.>_v- :v 'IWI'>•' ]r--.k-.- t'"'v; t'irf'i. y .S» El fc £f ’- m:m. '’k■ny'm. v/.-> .-••i ‘■'v’ ■ • • Iff ..-r^';'>*.,. f ■ •' - ■ ^.r > r- W-: Ap A^B MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Cod^ Amendment r ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE RE. LIGHTS DIREC FROM SITES ON T^ LMCD CODE c 'O ARTIFICIAL HE LAKE AMENDING >N 2.03 The Board of Directors of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District ordains that the LMCD Code of ordinances, Section 2.03, Subd. 1, is amended as follows: Section 2.03. Multiple Docks, Mooring Areas, Commercial Docks, Launching Ramps^ and Docks in Excess of 100 Feet In Length, and Sites From Which Artificial Lights Are Directed at the I<ake. Subd. 1. License Required. No person may locate, construct, Install or maintain a dock of more than 100 feet In length or a multiple dock or mooring area or a commercial dock or a launching ramp on the shoreline of the Lake, or In the waters of the L®he unless licensed by the Board to do so. No person may locate, construct. Install or maintain q dock at any slte<<a tka Lah»from which an affixed, unshielded artificial ’ight is dlrytej llljyij moft of th^ Lake bevond the dock use area for that :>ite unless Ilcetisted by the Board to do so. This enactment is In effect from and aft. • Its passage and publication In accordance with the enabling act of the District. It is enacted by a majority vote of all the membera of the Board and has the effect of an ordinance. Adopted by the LMCD Board of Directors this____day of ---------------------------» 1991. David H. Cochran, Chairman ATTESTS ^.P. Boawinkel, Secretary LKllO-013 t-:r* - r P.. t M-r,fc n^ ' • ♦-A! • ' l‘i'- ^>v :r'- U Uv. • fRv-* b - r-‘^ ■ &■• ■ I r If'^- ■iW. k-.... bt>«» • »->' * ■“• ■ 5h‘* y - — * - - “* LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT r—•' CF:*o . .:-UsO^ November 14, 1991 TOj Technical Review Committee FROMt Gene Strommen 'm ^ f .V*. Hlnutea of the last meeting, held October 3, 1991, are enclosed for vour AdvAnco InforiMtlon. The next meeting Is still upon call of the chair and/or any com bination of the cities that see a need to get together. If you have any questions, please contact Steve Prestln (378-2777) or Jim Uttley (291-6361). ERStJlm enc c/enci David Amdorfer Ron <)uanbeck, M.C.W.D. Bruce Sandstrom, Water & Soil Resources City of Greenwood City of Orono City of Wayzata ct Robert Rascop David Cochran •’ . V . V ■tT -*k C,'4 I • M a’V. i * t V -•4. P- rr. ^ i/" r- & ,1 !■■■ LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVAIION DISTHlCr MINL If.S TECHNICAL REVIEW ( L r; i i i I I- ( IIU') Meeting of Oct. 3. 1991. 8:00-10:30 A.M Norwest Bank BuilOinC Conference Hoorn 900 E. Wayzala Bi\d.. Wa>zata I. Minutes of 9/19 and agenda for H»/3/91 approved. lAttendence list for 10/3 enclosed) II. MCWD 'SOS’ Plan & responsibilities of cities. Ron Quanbeck briefly described that the 509 statute (103B. 235. Subd. 2) contains the requirements for contents of city plans. He also mentioned that the Management Strategy" section of the MCWD Plan also has some guidance for city officials in preparing their plans. Several of the requirements can be met by using the same information and descriptions in similar sections of the MCWD Plan. Following Ron’s comments, several members asked questions. One wondered how some of the cities can meet various requirements of the MCWD Plan if they have no built' stormsewer system. Ron said they need to just describe the existing situation, even if it involves only culverts, low pockets, wetlands, and other natural drainage features. Another member asked how the Shore land and '509 ' programs are tied together. Ed Pick responded by explaining that if cities cannot tieet the 25% impervious limit per lot of the Shoreland Regs, and want flexibility" on the issue, then probably the best approach would be a firm committment to develop and implement a stormwater management plan which is acceptable to the MCWD. The Chairman asked Ron if the MCWD has planning assistance available to the cities for preparation of stormwater plans. Ron responded that they do not currently have such assistance available in their budget. Ed Pick again mentioned the Shoreland grant progra- will have "administrative" grants available after cities adopt shoreland controls and that he feels some of this money might be used for this purpose. Bruce Sandstrom also explained that the BWSR has a grant program, but it will probably not work well for cities in Hennepin County because it was designed for "outstale" situations, not the Metro area. To meet requirements of the program. Hennepin County would have to raise $500,000 to be clegible for matching BWSR money. Bruce went on to explain that BWSR had recently sent its comnients on the MCWD Plan to the District, and that these include a suggestion that the Plan include more guidance for cities as to what their plans should cov’er. Ho said the MCWD might consider developing a model" plan for the cities to use. . ^ One TRC member mentioned that his city is considering setting up a stormwater management "utility to charge landowners a small fee on a regular basis which would then go into a dedicated fund to finance future stormwater management activities. t: I r I-lE^ A member then asked Ed Pick if every lot in a city must meet the 25% impervious limit, or if the overall average coverage for lots in a city could be used to meet the standard. F.d responded that an overall average would l>e acceptni)le. but that ail new lots would individually have to meet the requirement. Ed also mentioned that the Hennepin Conservation District is computing impervious coverage data from aerial photos and expects to have the Minnetonka area completed by the end of the year, so that might be a source of data for the cities to use. Steve Prestin inquired of Ed whether it would be acceptable for a city to adopt the 25% standard across-the-board and then deal with expansions and redevelopments on a case-by-case basis as variances if they cannot meet the standard. Ed said it would be an acceptable alternative, but several other members indicated the approach would be costly in legal fees for cases where landowners ignore the standard and are willing to fight enforcement of it in the courts. They base this conclusion on past experiences and said it would be better for the cities to spend the money developing stormwater plans than paying court costs. Finally, a member asked Bruce Sandstrom to comment on the inpementation of the 509 program, whether many WMO plans have been completed yet, and whether any cities have yet adopted their own plans. Bruce responded that 33 WMO plans have been developed and approved by the BVSR in the Metro area. Several cities have also adopted stormwater management plans within some of these WMO's. He mentioned Eagan. Lakeville, Maplewood, noseville, and Mounds View as examples. Bruce went on to acknowledge that the whole program is behind schedule - most of the deadlines in the statute have not been met. Several state agencies have been slow in meeting their responsibilities, and WMO’s and cities have also not met their f^'ligations in a timely fashion. Bruce mentioned that thr JNR. for example, has yet to provide its comments on the MCWD Plan. Bruce mentioned that the regulations currently under development regarding the updating of WMO plans (every 5 year.s) provide a 2 year period for cities to adopt/updatc their stormwater plans to meet new WMO requirements. III. BWSR Stormwater Management Perspectives Bruce Sandstrom gave a presentation involving several handouts and overheads. The handouts included: - A copy of a new law (Chapter 160) which requires local governments to see that all new developments of 1 acre or more have water retention devices or areas' for the site, and several requirements for WMO plans. - A copy of the 6th draft of the BWSR regulations being developed for "second generation" WMO plans in Metro. - A chart which compares requirements of the Shoreland Regulations with the draft Metro Watershed Management (509) Rules. ^ ^ r*Bruce began his presentation by mentioning that the araii rules were developed by a 44 member advisory committee with the following goals: - more uniform watershed management - rules should be a "template' for a planning process - they should strive to build consensus between groups - rules should focus on setting measurable goals bs '75-i;.*- - resulting plans need to be administratively and financially realistic- rules should allow flexibility in problem solving - there needs to be accountability for implementation Some observations concerning the Lake Minnetonka situation were next summarized by Bruce. These included: - many governments are involved, therefore problems are complex - there is a great need for cooperation - everyone involved should strive to prevent duplication of effort, such as in water quality monitoring - managing entities should share resources - there should be more effort devoted to non-point problems, including:- implementation of needed land use controls - a public awareneas/education program - focus on prevention - some stormwater system retrofitting — Bore financial assistance from state 4 regional Bruce suggested that existing problem areas could be addressed by using street sweeping and by managing other areas very well to off-set problem area impacts, which cannot often be realistically improved much. IV, Future Meetings ♦ After some discussion, members decided that the cities should now start developing their shoreland programs and br«ne<.e. Pick when one or more cities are ready. r< ^ rI'- (i I:. h t I:t k! P f' ;V;„ r,r R’ I r?II I I-I't . V*-*' HENNEFIN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 822 South Third Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415-1208 Phone. (612) 348-6846 FAX: (612) 348-8532 pn I J V November 15, 1991 Nr. Nerk Bernhardson Administrator, City of Orono P O Box 66 crystal Bey, MN 55323 iiov i 8 19«1 Dear Mr. Bernhardson: Solid Neste Management Advisory Committee. Advisory Committee. /P1 inform your mayor and city council of the four committee openings for elected municipal officials. letter of application stating interest in the committee 5* sent to Key Mitchell, Clerk of the County Board, at A2400 Government Center, Minneapolis, MN 55487 by November 29. Please include e day phone number, qualifications specific to the committee end a resume, if desired. The Hennepin County Board of commissioners will interview aoDlicants at the Ways 6 Means Committee on December 5 and maxe their appointments to the Solid Wast Management Advisory Committee on December 10. Sincerely, rd. Janet Leick Director Attachment Commissioners Dale Ackmann Vem Genzlinger HENNEPIN COUNTY on equal oppofHjnNy tmplovcr PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER / Oj Vi RESOLUTION NO. 91-10-BB7R; The following resolution was offered b> Commissioner McLaughlin, seconded by Conunlsbioner Judet BE IT RESOLVED, That the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners reestablish the Hennepin County Solid Haste Management Advisory Committee pursuant to Ninnesote Statute 473.803 end Resolution 91-9-515R4, with the goal of maintaining Hennepin County as the foremost urban county in the United States in Its conservation of resources and management of solid waste; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That committee membership will consist of 19 voting members comprised of the following: •even non-elected citizen representatives (one from each city where a solid waste facility is or may be located), four elects municipal officials, and four representatives from private waste management firms to be selected in accordance with Hennepin County's open appointments policy such that committee representation is achieved as required by law; and four appointments, outside of the open appointment process: one selected by the Chairman of the County Board; one selected by Commissioners representing Districts 1 and 7; one selected by Commissioners representing Districts 2 and 3; and one selected by Commissioners representing Districts 5 and 6; and the Cleric of the Board is directed to solicit applications for 15 of the 19 committee positions; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Chairman of the Public Service Committee will serve as Chairman of the Solid Haste Management Advisory Committee and be a non-voting member of that committee. The question was on the adoption of the resolution and there were TEAS and kq_ _ _ NAYS as follows: COUNTY OF HENNEPIN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Peter McLaughlin Y£A X NAY OTHER Randy Johnso:t John Keefe Tad Jude Judy Makowske Mark Andrew John E. Derus, Chairman RESOLUTION ADOPTED. ATTEST: on ? P »99l 6 ■iii?¥' • kt. /i /' ifv ■-!R,'.' ri’v '^V'in: mfk,:’ I’-:,'m- ;». ■ • ;" i ■ ivf;:- ■• ::u^, fe j'r ■ ■ M,:Pi:-. f >. i .' V-.. : iif: ri • ^■- »:■■ A‘-I- Tft. ^t‘v Rr- A. B. C. 0. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT I ■ ' • •' * t -> * I LAKE USE COMNITTEE AGENDA W 1 ® Monday, November 25, 1991. 4:30 PM Norwest Bank Biiildinis 900 E. Wayzata Blvd. Room 135 (Elevator access for Il;indicapped: use west entrance on Wavzata Blvd.) Special Event renewal application for Lord Fletchers Broonball; to meet due date, application was submitted prior to fee increase adoption, r ecomme. nd i ng that old fee schedule apply Joint and Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County for the Sheriff's Water Patrol services, and discussion of working relationship Communication regarding DNR's proposed change in size of snowmobile registration numbers Resolution to set application fees for Special Events and Watercraft for Hire, superseding Resolution ^162 (in part). B. Resolution to set application fees for wine and iion- intoxicating beer licenses, superseding Resolution #54. P. Set date for Save the Lake Recognition Dinner, recommending Wednesday 2/19/92 G. Review appointees for subcommittee to study signs at accesses on Lake Minnetonka. H. Water Patrol Report I. Additional Business recommended by the Committee 11/18/91 'i; fr ... h:in Iqutl Opportunity EmptoyM- f fe! b>- y..-. 't I I f - ('*■" • j Phonic(612)296*2428 STATE OF MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BOARD 8uit« 475 HoOolX Building 366 JaeksoD Stroot St. Paul, Mianasota 5510 nr. c? J'_ _ _C'X'3 !|l •'. T-- 1. I MBMOBAMBnM wov 2 1 «Dt flOCt Fartlas of Baoord inea A. Zaaeutlya Diraetor' • llaEfi:^| irmntnT^ omi MOVMter It, 1991 •QBUCVt D-254 OxoBO/A-4710 Long Laka fiM liaariag aokadulad for iiovwbar 25, 1991 ill ba oontinuad to a latar data. Ten nay not with to ba at tba haaring on itovanbar 25, as z will only caaoBvana tba baaring and iaoMdiataly continua it to January 22, 1992 at 9t00 a.n. in tba Long Laka City Ball. No tsatiaony will ba takan on lionnbar 25, 1991. «lltajh O.O^ • •rr' ■■: 1 1 i *'! • L - -^' *j —- MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF October 17, 1991 MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRiq||Mi a a BOARD OF MANAGERS ipw t i The regular meeting of the Board of Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District was called to order by Vice-Chairman Love at 7:40 p»m. on Thursday, October 17, 1991, at Wayzata City Hall in Wayzata, Minnesota. Managers present: Love, Maple, Lindley, and Miller. Managers absent: Erickson, Thomas and Chairman Spensley. Also present were Board Advisors Quanbeck and Jones. Approval of Agenda It was moved by Manager Lindley, seconded by Manager Maple, that the agenda be adopted. Upon vote, the motion carried unanimously. Approval The Managers reviewed the minutes of the regular meeting of September 19, 1991. It was moved by Manager Maple, seconded by Manager Lindley, that the minutes of the September 19, 1991, be approved. Upon vote, the minutes were unanimously approved. Approval of Permit Applications It was moved by Manager Lindley, seconded by Manager Maple, that permit applications 9l-»S0. citv of Richfield; —B.fUCfl Clark; and si-137. of Plymouth be approved, based upon reconnendation of staff that the applicants had met all applicable rules. Upon vote, the motion carried unanimously. Tahlipo of Permit Application It was moved by Manager Lindley, seconded by Manager Maple, that permit application 9i-i33. united Power Asaocia^n be tabled, based upon staff recommendation that the application is not complete. Upon vote, the motion was approved unanimously. -1-(ia/i7/9i) nr k Hearing of Pormit! Applications ^1-^2. Jerry Xoosman — Stormwater management plan for a 4-lot ainole-familv residential subdivision called "Abbewfood Two* on a 51 acre site. Staff Indicated that this project involves a four-lot single-family residential subdivision, and recommended approval of the project, pending receipt of those items noted in staff's report. Mr. Eulberg appeared on behalf of the developer, and indicated that the developer finds the recommendations of staff to be acceptable. It was moved by Manager Lindley, seconded by Manager Miller, that the permit be approved with issuance conditioned upon receipt of those items set forth in staff's report in a form and substance acceptable to staff. Upon vote, the motion carried unanimously. 91-122. Mark Z. Jones. II — Stormwater management plan for a 12 unit townhome development called “Ramsaate To%#nhomes*. Staff reviewed the history of this project, noting that the development involves property located southwest of the intersection of Cambridge Street and Hiawatha Avenue in the City of Hopkins. Staff noted concerns expressed by the residents about downstream flooding. Staff indicated that the exhibits provided by the developer generally conform to the District's rules. Staff expressed concern about the slope of the banks of the proposed pond, and recommended that a cash surety be required to ensure performance in any necessary remedial action. Staff further indicated that the apartment complex, which was previously developed by Mr. Jones, appears to have encroached on the present site by placing an aggregate parking area along che length of the west edge of the site. Mr. McNeff appeared on behalf of the Minnehaha Oaks Association. Manager Miller stated that he was concerned that the Watershed District was being pulled into issues beyond the scope of the District's jurisdiction. Manager Lindley asked for more information concerning the Minnehaha Oaks Association. Mr. McNeff responded that it is a non-profit organization incorporated to save certain trees which would be destroyed by the proposed development. Mr. McNeff provided a detailed review of the development of the area surrounding the proposed development, including many slides of the area dating back to 1945. The slides indicated that substantial amounts of area near the Oak Forest homes have been covered by impervious material. Mr. McNeff also provided slides which, he daisied, showed that trees have been removed from portions of the proposed site, so that the site could be used for parking for the neighboring apartment. Mr. McNeff also provided the Board of Managers with written material summarizing the Minnehaha Oaks Association's position and reproducing certain UlairtOT -2-(ia/i7/si) II; r5)l.l I 0-*J- -T r .•-.■♦ slides which were a part of the presentation to the Board of Managers. A copy of this report was made a part of the record concerning this matter. Chris Hayhoe# an attorney for Mr. Jones, asked to address the Board o£ Managers. He indicate’ that Mr. Jones has attempted to meet ell issues raised by the District’s staff, and to do so in a fashion that was consistent with the watershed’s rules. He indicated further that a court challenge has been raised concerning whether an Environmental Impact statement was needed for this site. He noted that the City of Hopkins determined that the impact of this development on Minnehaha Creek would be minimal. Mr. Hayhoe stated that any encroachment on the site to be developed is a separate issue that should be looked at by the District's Violations Committee. Mr. Hayhoe stated that the City of Hopkins has been granted a maintenance easement concerning the pond to be constructed as a part of this project. This easement would require the developer or any subsequent owner to maintain the pond. The City would have the right to enter the property and make any necessary corrections and assess the cost of doing so against the owners. Lisa Benson addressed the Board of Managers, stating that there has been a continuing flooding problem in her basement. Sh raised s concern that another development will only make the situation worse. Manager Love indicated that the proposed project meets the current rules of the watershed District and that any flooding problems created by the Ramsgate Apartments cannot be addressed as a part of the District's consideration of the present project. Manager Lindley concurred with Manager Love, stating that the District cannot make the owner of this parcel rectify the errors and omissions of developers of hundreds of acres over the past 45 years. Manager Miller raised concerns about the proposed slope of the banks of the pond, and stated that he believes that the District's rules in this regard should be strictly enforced. It was moved by Manager Maple and seconded by Manager Miller that the permit be approved with issuance conditioned upon receipt of those items set forth in the staff’s report in a form and substance acceptable to staff. Manager Miller indicated that he was appreciative of the thoroughness of the presentation of those opposing this project, and stated that the situation pointed out the problems inherent in piecemeal development. However, he indicated that the Commission could only deal with those items which were before it and could not require any particular developer to take remedial action based upon past problems. Manager Maple concurred with Manager Miller's remarks, and stated that it was regrettable that the State has not been more active in this area. SiHiM -3-(ia/i7/ti) I'n 1 r , ■'Ilf r I ^ - fe- ■h:w Mana^or Maple then clarified his motion# indicating that his motion required the developer to meet recommendations 1 through 4 of 8taff*s report and would require a new plan to be submitted with a 3-to-l slope for the pond in a form and substance acceptable to staff. Given the new plan# no surety would t>e required as proposed by staff in recommendation 6. Manager Miller indicated that# as the seconder of the motion# he concurred with this explanation. Upon vote# the motion carried unanimously. Manaqer Maple moved that the e^.croachment matter be referred to the Violations Committee. The motion was seconded by Manager Miller. Manaqer Lindley asked how the construction of the townhouse would impact the encroachment parking area on the development site. Mr. Jones indicated that the parking in question would be eliminated# and that a new parking area would be established. Manager Maple and Miller agreed to withdraw the motion# in light of the fact that the encroachment would be reserved as a part of the construction of the development. '‘*-anaqer Miller commended the Minnehaha Oaks Association and others who had testified against the proposed development. He noted that their presentation had been very professional# and extremely thorough. Manager Lindley requested that a copy of the easement granted to the City of Hopkins in regard to the pond be provided to the Watershed District for its records. gTl<moen>i| Oilleapte — Removal of an old WQOd 1 rniifjillfltlon of 145 lineal feet of rio rap protection. Staff indicated that this project is located on Jennings Bay of Lake Minnetonka, in the City of Minnetrista. Staff further indicated that all materials requested had been received and that staff reconnends approval of the permit. It was moved by Manager Lindley# seconded by Manager Miller# that the permit be approved# bated upon recommendation of staff. Upon vote# the motion carried unanimously. Klocknor — Installation of 75 lineal feet of oroaion protection. Staff indicated that this project is located at the West Arm of Lake Minnetonka# in the City of Orono. Staff recommends approval of the project# pending receipt of a signed application. It was moved by Lindley# seconded by Manager Maple# that the permit be approved# based upon recommendation of staff. Upon vote# the motion carried unanimously. WwlM -4-(ian7/fi) n' >• r 11. V 99-12^. Clair Rood — Dredging to create an open water Pond in a wfffeland and fill and excavation in the floodplain areat. It was moved by Manager Maple, seconded by Manager Lindley, that this permit be approved with issuance conditioned upon receipt of those items set forth in staff's report in a form and substance acceptable to staff. Upon vote, the motion carried unanimously. qi«134. city of St. Louis Park — Stormwater management Pond flxnangion. etlt removal and rio rap around existing Oregon Pond—U1 MC-iq sutnfatarahed. It was moved by Manager Maple, seconded by Manager Lindley, that the permit be approved, with issuance conditioned upon receipt of those items listed in staffs report in a form and substance acceptable to staff. Upon vote, the motion carried unanimously. Staff indicated that this is the last project in MC-19 subwatershed. the A<i«iitlonal wlD Rao Permit Staff indicated that it had received an application for a permit to apply 94 lineal feet of rip rap, to be constructed of mixed fieldstone. The applicant is Robert Jooke of 6590 Bayview in the City of victoria. Staff reviewed the application and concluded that it meets all District rules. Cliff Reep appeared on behalf of the applicant and indicated that he was aware that the application was late, but requested that the permit be approved, in light of the short remaining construction schedule. It was moved by Manager Miller, seconded by Manager Lindley, that the permit be issued, based upon staff's recommendation, upon vote, the motion carried unanimously. Engineer's Report It was mov«. oy Manager Lindley, seconded by Manager Miller, that the agenda be suspended in order to hear the engineer's report. Upon vote, the motion carried unanimously. 1. level. Staff reported that as of October 17, 1991, the lake level was 928.90 feet, with the flow at the Gray's Bay dam being 124 cfs. It is anticipated that the target lake level of 928.6 feet should be reached or. or about November 1. 2. Cray's B»v Haadwaters Ooeratino Policy. Staff reported that the operating policy is up for renewal. Staff intends to ggnd out copies of the policy to jurisdictions and businesses who could be directly affected. Manager Lindley agreed that the policy should be made widely available to encourage public comment. Manager Maple concurred with this approach. A meeting Miaalaa -5- srtnm,.. 4 f i' ■fe. of the Plans and Programs Committee was set for 6:30 p.m. November 21, 1991, prior to the regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Managers to take public comment on the plan. 3, South Katrina Marsh Easement. This project involves the Painter's Woods Development, which is located on the municipal boundary of the Cities of Orono and Independence. Mr. McDowell owns a lot in this development, and the Watershed District has an easement across this lot in order to maintain certain watershed structures on Painter Creek. Mr. McDowell has suggested that a different easement be provided to the Watershed District, providing for an alternative access to the structures, but which would allow for construction in an area of the existing easement on this parcel. Mr. McDowell asked for the Board’s reaction to such a proposal. Manager Miller indicated that he would not support granting a variance concerning the floodplain. It was indicated that no such variance would be necessary. Manager Lindley suggested that a physical inspection should be performed by the engineers, that a would bo n6C6SS3ry; 3nd th3t Mr. McDowc^^l s iGgsl counsol would need to draft documents to vacate the old easement and create a new one. Manager Lindley indicated that if upon inspection, staff was satisfied that the new easement would satisfy the needs of the watershed District and that Mr. McDowell would be prepared to bear all costs involved, that he, as one Manager, would be willing to consider such a proposal. Plane anil Programs Committee It was moved by Manager Lindley, seconded by Manager Maple, that the agenda be amended to hear the report of the Plans and Programs Committee. Upon vote, the matter was approved unanimously. 1, Long Laka gleanwafcer Partnership. Paul Nelson and Randy Anhorn of JMM Minnesota presented to the Board their initial report. (a) Dlaonoatie data: Staff reported that there has not been much change in water quality in the last 30 years. Most users of Long Lake do not live in the immediate area. In the past. Long Lake was considered a good fishing lake. In recent years, the mix of the species of fish has changed with bullheads now being the primary species. The primary water quality issue is significant amounts of blue-green algae. Controlling phosphorus levels in the lake is the primary way to reduce the algae level. The existence of substantial algae results in reduced recreational opportunities. 'The monitoring program also found low oxygen levels during the summer months. This in turn puts stress on the fish -6- l( ii’ P • : population. The primary source of phosphorus is external loading, such as stormwater running into the lake and water entering the lake from a creek. By reducing phosphorus levels, the lake water quality should improve rapidly since it is estimated that the water in the lake turns over on a yearly basis. The goal should be to reduce the phosphorus level entering the lake, and to improve the oxygen level of the lake. (b) Tmpiftmentationr Public education was viewed as a primary component of this project. That is, reduction of fertilizer use, better maintenance of septic systems, and other such measures are very important. The City of Long Lake has expressed an interest in cooperating with the District in this effort. Initiating a street cleaning project in the City of Long Lake is a necessary step. Installation of an aeration system to increase oxygen levels was also recommended, as was the creation of certain detention basins to reduce the phosphorus load. The plan also calls for the construction of certain additional wetlands in the creek before it runs into the Lake. The DNR has indicated that they would be willing to provide a fisheries management plan on an "in-kind" basis. Finally, the project would include post-implementation monitoring. Staff indicates that the proposal must be submitted by October 31, in order to be considered for the 1992 budget. A resolution attached to these minutes as Exhibit A was moved by Manager Maple, seconded by Manager Lindley, authorizing the submission of the application. Upon vote, the motion carried. On October 1, 1991, the Plans and Programs Committee met to consider the LMCD's long-range plan for Lake Minnetonka. The comments of the District were communicated to the LMCD at an October 16, 1991, public hearing concerning the long-range plan. On October 8, 1991, the Plans and Programs Committee met to consider the Wayzata Stormwater Management Plan. The Plan generally conforms to the District‘s 509 Plan. However, the 509 Plan must be approved prior to any action by the District on the City's Stormwater Management Plan. The Committee also discussed the proposed project by the City of Wayzata to take over responsibility for certain portions of Cleason Creek, in order to more effectively manage stormwater. Violations Committee Manager Love reviewed the status of outstanding violations, and indicated that progress was being made in the resolution of a -7-<ia/i7/H) E'Mv ;■ number of these matters. He further indicated that the ConuT\ittee had met in Executive Session to discuss outstanding litigation issues. Finance Coimittee Manager Lindley reviewed the Treasurer’s report, as well as the outstanding invoices to be paid. It was moved by Lindley, seconded by Manager Erickson, that the Board authorize payment of all invoices as set forth in the Treasurer’s report. Upon vote, the motion carried unanimously. Buies and Policies Committee No report. Attorney*s Henort No report. ' There being no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 9:51 p.ro. Respectfully submitted. John E. Thomas - Secretary Attachment 918DAJ(86) -8-fia/17/tn iaJ , !, r B B- r I ■; ' f. I f.r- MMMOUmW noNi A CaLIANWAIBtFASI LONOLABiB . 4 -.1 sAiBoacr ItOBlIRALOf A OBANT AVPUCAnON FOB Df OODMnr, MDOWyiA ilAS «8aetnit hwrt bttii faUnttfUA nctrdinf tbt walir quality of Long and tad lak* um; aoA I 4 4 AS Cbt Ctttk WiltnAtd Dlttriik wiahu to Imploaoat l roprUto SB IT BI80LVBD by Iho UtaatlidM Ciwk WaUnhod Dlrtrio t tlMt ii honby dotlgooto Um Unta 0# JtaMO H Iftntpawr. Cftaittoi Bnfiaoin. Ine. at tho Proioot ibr tho Loaf laiyloBMatalloa Frtioefa propoood Clooo Wator CA) ahaU VHpiadaMi aad CUaa Walor Partaanblp Voio oa fttehiSon’ajTM aayt wii idipted at tha Ottabar 17, IMl flEMatiag of tho «• • VXOSaHHXM—HHr WJSSSSO 16 St It MilUIMEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT P.0, Sm 3S7. Wavnta. Minnesota 55391 ___iVWIIMMrJaMlR. Spmsliy[Pr«s. •JoMiE. Ttwnws«RictiardR Milter aM 0. blckm • C. WMiow Lom • Qarlaon LMIn • Ttamas Maoe. Ult MINIIfTOMM L' V z\ ' f, PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE MEETING 6:30 p.m Thursday, November 21, 1991 St. Louis Park City Hall — City Council Chambers St. Louis Park, Minnesota 1.Renewal of existing management and operating policy for Gray's Bay Headwaters Control Structure. I'' 3. MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD OF MANAGERS AGENDA Thursday, November 21, 1991 St. Louis Park City Hall City Council Chambers 7:30 p.m. X, to firder: note attendance. 2. Aporoygl pf Agenda. gjiadino and approval of mlnutss of ths Pequlsr 17. 1991. 4. ^aarino ol Permit Applications. A.Parmtt AppHcation Hq. Applicant: RDP Partners c/o R. Putnam 2765 Casco Point Road wayaata, MN 55391 Location: City of Spring Park, Sec. 18DD, Spring Park Bay, Lake Minnetonka Stormwater management plan for a 1.5 acre commercial development in Spring Park.Purpose: B.Parmit Application Wo. 91«-0I; Applicant: Jones-Harrison Residence 3700 Cedar Lake Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55416 City of Minneapolis, Sec. 32CB, Cedar Lake Stormwater management plan for construction of an addition to an existing building and parking ramp. Location: Purpose: C.We. 91—133: Applicant: United Power Association 17845 E. Hwy. 10 Elk River, MN 55330 Location: City of Medina, Sec. 22BC, east of Willow Drive and south of Hwy. 24 Stormwater management plan for «*p4nslon of an existing substation and placement of fill in the floodplain. Purpose: D. E. F. G. H. Permit: Apolication Ho. 91-14Q: Applicant: Carlson Real Estate Co. 2222 Plaza VIII 45 S. Seventh Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Location: Cities of Minnetonka and Plymouth, Sec. 3BB and 34CC Stormwater management plan for grading to fill three Type 1 and 2 wetlands south of Carlson Parkway and east of 1-494. Purpose: Permit Application Ho. Applicant: Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board 310 So. Fourth Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55415 Location: City of Minneapolis, Sec. 9BC, north of Lake Harriet Alteration of a wetland in the Roberts Bird Sanctuary to increase open water area.Purpose: Permit Application Wo. 91-142: Applicant: City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Location: City of Mound, Sec. 24AC, Emerald Lake, Lake Minnetonka Dredging to remove approximately 550 cubic yards of material from a dock area and installation of an unspecified amount of rip rap shoreline erosion protection. Purpose: Permit Application Wo. 91-143: Applicant: City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Location: City of Mound, Sec. 30BC, Phelps Bay, Lake Minnetonka Installation of 300 lineal feet of rip rap shoreline erosion protection.Purpose: Permit Application Wo. 91-»144r Applicant: John and Karen Latterner 27950 Smith Town Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Location: City of Spring Park, Sec. 18CO, Halsteads Bay, Lake Minnetonka Purpose: Stormwater management plan for a building expansion and site grading north of County Road 15 and west of Kings Road. . -2- '•7 • . •%k Ir- ir fc- ri:- ■ ir- '% f': I‘ W‘- h B'tpV.:I- ;;f‘'P' I- f- li-^- f :*■ fw |-.r ku:p'"' I*'w:t. F- F‘"-m' K..- 5. I.Ho. 91-145: Applicant: Location: Purpose: Carlson Real Estate Co. c/o Lundgren Bros. Construction, Inc. 935 E. Wayzata Blvd. Wayzata, MN 55391 City of Minnetrista, Sec. 27DC, Halsteads Bay, Lake Minnetonka Dredging to remove approximately 15,000 cubic yards of material from a channel for navigational access. J.Pftrmtt Aopltcation Ho- 91-146; Applicant: Merritt Peterson 4722 W. Fairhills Road Minnetonka, MN 55345 Location: City of Orono, Sec. 17BD, West Arm, Lake Minnetonka Dredging to remove 2,300 cubic yards of material from a channel to improve access. Purpose: Piihlie hearing congernino whether an Environmental Assessment Mnrkahaotr should be required for the Channel PciYfl Homaownar’e Assoeiation Dredaino Project located on fik. Alban*a Bav of Lake Minnetonka. 6. rftmplatnts and Violations Committee RePDTt. 7. Finance Committee A. Treasurer*8 Report. 8, Plana and Programs Committee Report. 9. Pules and Poltetea Committee Report 10. Engineer’s Report 11. Atternev’s Report. 12. Unfinished Business. 13. New Business. 14, Adjournment. 9170AJ(3S)-3- ^ If maaA • ^ ^ - .. i ■ ■■ J n strllsfffT^J niAsifii i i ‘ > ^ ir- i •/• y I -'7^'f ff^r* Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission443 OAK STREET • EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331 • (612)474-5539 ‘•i a~, cf C.-C*.3 OATEt Novanber 12« 1991 riKwr: 151991 TO I LHCCC COHMISSION/ ALL DIRECTORS FROHt Otto Wllcsok REt UPCOMING MEETING Our noict full CouulMion meeting ia scheduled for ^ueadey, November 19, 1991, in the Commission office. Room 204 of the Exeeleior Community Center. eble to eort this down to s few likely csndidstes to intervxew. presming business for thst meeting• See you sll on November 19 Jm. . SpiSS. J . . A Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission 443 OAK STREET • EXCELSIOR. MINNESOTA 55331 • (612)474 5539 LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION FULL COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY« NOVEMBER 19, 1991 5:00 P.M. « ROOM 204, EXCELSIOR COMMUNITY CENTER AGENDA I. Call to Ordar II. Approval of October minutes III. Reports a) Officers:Treasurer~”3rd Otr. Report Administrative Update b) Trlax IV. Unfinished Business a> Presentations Regarding 1992 Budget b) Metro Cable Network Ch. 6 Signal Problem: Report from Trlax c) Joint Powers/Bylaws Review: Counsel Recommendations V. Mew Business a) Resume' Screening Committee Report b> 1992 Staff Salary & Job Description Recommendations c> 1990 Census Updated Member City Vot VI. Adjournment 1 .Ji w ^' :U * k. MINUTES LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING TUESDAY/ OCTOBER 15, 1991 5:00 P.M. ROOM ?04 EXCELSIOR COMMUNITY CENTER 443 OAK STREET, EXCELSIOR Prior to th« m««ting being called to order, Ade. Watte re- queated tiee for Prod. Coordinator Schindler to present the monthly production report and to present the report he had been directed to draft on workshop plans for the coming year. Schindler stated that overall retention of volunteers had been high during the past year. Beginning winter quarter, an orien- tation/tour would be offered and he would be requiring a pre- production fora from those who wanted to take a class as a means of getting volunteers to make a commitment to a project and gearing class content to those needs. Pattrin stated that teachers from Wayzata schools who had taken classes at the etudio were very pleased. With no further questions, Schindler was excused from the meeting. Administrator Watts then announced to the Commission she was resigning her position effective November 1, 1991, and sub mitted a letter to that effect. She thanked the members for the opportunity to serve them and in particular thanked the commit tee for the opportunity to work with them. Olds, Wright and Naaarow complimented Watts on her job performance. I.CALL TO ORDER Chair Brancel called the meeting to DIRECTORS PRESENT Barb Brancel/Shorewood Tim Pattrin/Orono Jin Olds/Excelsior Otto Wilcsek/Minnetrista Jimsie Wright/Greenwood order at 5:20 P.M. OTHERS PRESENT Jennifer Watta/Admin. Kathe Ehlert/Ad.Asst. Paul Nazarow/Triax II.APPROVAL OF MINUTES Brancel asked for discussion or a motion to approve the October minutes. Motion iO.lS.91.It Olds moved to approve the October minutes Wilesek seconded. The motion passed unanimously. 111.UEfiSX& Treasurer*s Report Wilesek presented the Just through 10/15/91,(attachment 1), Wager's represented the final p ment and that a CD had been tr>' operating expenses. Motion 10.1S.9J _i: Wilczek m-, the period 9/1B/9I through 10/1^/ Claims for the period 9/1B/91 explaining that cKa^k 42451 to ent on the maintenancir agree- rred to the cash account for CO approve the Just Claims for 91. Wright seconded. The motion passed unanimously. Wilesek said the quarterly report would be presented at the November meeting. rr 1! 1,1' r. .*• I. -•■til:. LM<^CC Minutes--Page two Adainlstrator*a Report Watts reported that one camera was cut for repair, but the studio had been able to borrow one from Wayzata. Hughes-Seamans, Schindler and Blechert would be attending the LOPMM Conference, and Wilczek, Pattnn, Olds and Watts the MAC FA Conference. She distributed the 1990 census information on mem ber cities to the commissioners. Watts noted that Olds and Brancel would emcee the Volunteer Recognition Awards Program, to be cablecast live from the Excelsior studio. As part of the access development activities. Watts stated that October had been designated Community TV month by Governor Carlson, and sh» had placed an ad in the Sailor promoting the Commission and the studio. She stated the new LMCCC brochure and logo would soon be ready. Vfatts distributed copies of a letter from Triax's legal coun sel regarding the dropping of the service call charge. Watts stated that there was a complaint pending from a sub scriber in the Victoria area who had experienced intermittent ’''..tages. Nazarow stated Triax would continue to monitor the situation. Watts informed the Commission that recent court decisions would now allow RBOCs to provide video services. A copy of "How to be a Board Member" would be available in the Commission office. She concluded by stating that Channel b would be holding a fundraiser in November, and that copies of Wilczek's letter from Senator Wellstone regarding his position on S 12 were available. Triax Report Nazarow distributed the monthly and studio reports. Homes Passed 11,916 Basic Subs Expanded Basic Subs 6 Total Pay Units 3 Total A/Os 3 103 010 650 096 Total Remotes 2,307 Nazarow delivered the subscriber surveys (962) as well as a report summarizing the results, stating they had followed up on all responses.* Watts thanked Nazarow and suggested that in fu ture surveys# Triax consider using a professional data research firm to interpret the responses and give the survey greater credibility. Nazarow stated he would be making a decision within ten days regarding the equipment survey. He also stated that commercial ad insertions were running on ESPN, USA and TNT, but not yet on CNH. Pattrin asked if the access studio could have access to local ad insertions, Nazarow replied he would check. Copies available by calling Triax or the LMCCC office i f'i*V fe- ■U- i*. L*. 4 LMCCC Minutes-Page thre® XV.UNFINISHED BUSIMESS •) 1992 Budget Approval (Update) Uatta reported that the 1992 Budget had passed with a majority o£ the member cities approving the proposal. (0 approv ed. 5 rejected, one still in the process) As directed, she had sent a latter to those cities that had rejected the budget, saying that it had passed and offering to send a representative to their meeting to clarify the issue. Wilczek agreed to go to the Tonka Bay meeting on October 22 and Olds would go to Spring Park on October 21. b) Metro Cable Network Channel 6 Signal Problem Nazarow stated that the technician working on channel 6 had found one problem, and would continue to look. Motion i0.15.91.3t Wright moved to request Triax to appear before the Commission in November with a technical explanation of the Channel 6 signal problem and a proposal for resolution by D^ecaber 1. Pattrin seconded. The motion passed unanimously. c) Access Development Committee Proposal--Purchase Bequests Vatts distributed cost estimates for portable studio needs and suggested postponem ■ due to staff changes. Motion 10.15.91.4» Wric moved to table the access development committee proposal purchase requests for portable st <-..o needs. Wilczek seconded. The motion passed unanimously. IfAtts presented the staff recommendation for automation, sug gesting that members look at the two options in use in other locations before making a decision. No action was taken. d) Channel 21 Signal Problem (Update) Watts stated she had been monitoring the situation and it ap peared to have been resolved. e) Joint Powers/Bylaws Review (Update) Watts suggested that some of the changes addressed in the joint powers/bylaws update process could be covered in a policy manual rather than amendments to those documents. Staff was directed to confer with counsel regarding this suggestion. f> Access Equipment Replacement (Update) The discussion of access equipment replacement had been tabled the previous month, pending completion of Triax*s equip ment survey. Pattrin asked for clarification of the Commission's authority in case of a difference of opinion regarding level of performance of equipment. Olds stated it is not specified in the franchise agreement. Wilczek stated that a good consultant as well as a record of out of service dates, would help. No action was taken. g> Volunteer Recognition Awards (Update) This item had been covered during the production report and administrator's report. V.MEW BUSINESS a) Salary Survey/Staff Proposal Watts distributed salary survey data, including proposed sug gestions for changes to job descriptions. Olds stated that 5- •y J * Xf- 'i. LMCCC Hxnutas--Page Four there should be a separate meeting to discuss job descriptions with regard to hiring. Watts then read the ad that had been run the last time an ad • ministrstor had been hired. It was suggested that the same ad run In the Stmr Tribune, changing the salary range and due date. 01ds« Wright, Pattrin and Brancel agreed to serve as the resume’ screening committee, meeting on Wednesday, November 6, to go through resume’s and set up the interviewing process. Wilczek reminded Watts to give her job description to the screening com mittee. Watts then suggested that a commissioner should plan to come in to the office to oversee the transition, and stated that it had been the treasurer last time. Wilczek agreed to do that. Motion 10.IS.91.S: Olds moved that Treasurer Wilczek oversee the transition to the new administrator. Wright seconded. The motion passed by a vote of 4-0 with one abstention (Wilczek). Watts suggested job descriptions for the production coordinator and administrator be changed to indicate more production responsibility for the production coordinator, allowing the administrator more time for access development ano public relations work. Motion 10.15.91.6I Pattrin moved to accept the job description recommendations as outlined by Watts. Olds seconded. The mo tion passed unanimously. Staff would draft these proposals for action at the full commission meeting. b> Proposal to Cities re: cable outages Motion 10.15.91.7: Wilczek moved to table the proposal to cities regarding cable outages. Pattrin seconded. The motion passed unanimously. o> Request from Vaconia Community Education Waconia Community Education had requested franchise fee funos to support a staff position for video production at their studio. Watts suggested that a policy be developed to deal with this type of request in the future. Motion 10.IS.91.Bt Olds moved staff be directed to respond to Waconia Community Education that assets are available to all subscribers and cannot be assigned, and that the access development committee prepare a policy to be presented to the Commission. Wilczek seconded. The motion passed unanimously. d> Metro Cable Network Fundraiser/Talent Show No action was taken. VI. ADJOURNMENT Motion 10.IS.91.9I Wilczek moved to adjourn the meeting Wright seconded. The meeting adjourned at 6:SO P.M. Resp^tf>Aly sutyaitted. the Ehlert, Administrative Assistant ^fVrl: '■i [1 I .•S-' -,! ■i i- u.rC a*'ft- V-’ ' V' ll’.-I'M i-l{5- &■' 'f-:/ ••»LMCCe OCTOBER CLAIMS 9/18/91 TO CHECK •DATE PAYABLE 2442 SEPT 20 NATO A 2443 SEPT 20 LCPMN 2442 SEPT 20 JIM SCHINDLER 10336 SEPT 27 JIM SCHINDLER 10337 SEPT 27 JENNIFER MATTS 10338 SEPT 27 AARON BLECHERT 10339 SEPT 27 KATHE EHLERT 2445 SEPT 27 U.S. POSTMASTER 2446 SEPT 27 TONKA PRINTING 2447 SEPT 27 GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS 2448 SEPT 27 PERA 2449 SEPT 27 U.S. WEST 2450 SEPT 27 IND. SCHOOL DISTRICT 2451 SEPT 27 WAGERS 2452 SEPT 27 JENNIFER WATTS 2453 OCT 9 U.S. POSTMASTER 2454 OCT 9 NORTHWEST FABRICS 2455 OCT 11 MACTA 2456 OCT 11 JENNIFER WATTS 2457 OCT 11 /IN SCHINDLER 2458 OCT 15 NORWEST BANKS 2459 OCT 15 PERA 2460 OCT 15 MULTICHANNEL NEWS 2461 OCT 15 TAPE DISTRIBUTORS OF MN 2462 OCT 15 PAYCHEX 2463 OCT 15 DAVE CLARK 10340 OCT 15 JIM SCHINDLER 10341 OCT 15 JENNIFER WATTS 10342 OCT ih AARON BLECHERT 10343 OCT IS^K .KATHE EHLERT il‘5 AMOUNT ACCT «275.00 MEMB/UUES 90.00 CONF/SCHOOLS 267.00 HEALTH INS. 544.10 PAYROLL 643.08 PAYROLL 175.84 PAYROLL 53.93 PAYROLL 29.00 POSTAGE 53.50 ACCESS DEV. 97.34 OFFICE SUPP 174.80 PERA BENEFITS 126.73 TELEPHONE 430.00 OFFICE SPACE 197.30 OFFICE EQUIP 35.75 MILEAGE 40.94 POSTAGE 47.76 ACCESS DEV. 200.00 CONF/SCHOOLS 30.38 MILEAGE 13.06 MILEAGE 1253.76 FED TAXES 168.81 PERA BENEFITS 54.00 DUES/MEMBERSHI 726.00 TAPE STOCK FUN 45.60 SEC'Y SERVICES 32.50 ACCESS STAFF 497.64 PAYROLL 834.06 PAYROLL 154.97 PAYROLL 33.71 PAYROLL TOTAL CLAIMS BANK EXCELSIOR Beginning belance<corrected) ClAlna Conference Reimb Conference Reimb SCCU CD transfer Septeeber Service Charge September Interest ENDING BALANCE SCCU ACCOUNTS Balance Share Acet Balance Preferred Cert, of Deposit (11/10) ENDING BALANCE TOTAL FUNDS A7526.S8 A3084.13 -7526.58 37.60 35.00 20000.00 -12.60 22.41 S3SS2SMSSSSS 415639.76 46765.41 53183.99 26000.00 ssssssssssas 485949.40 ssasssssssss 4101589.16 I fin«nei«l •tatatnt 3rd pm tt Hftfi iMokino aoet lb 7/1/91 lug aoeount Kf tliara Draft Acct. BCV Dr«f«rrad Shara Acct. Vtitieataa of Dapoait (aaturaa 7/10) <aaturaa 7/24) TOTAL FUNDS g 7/l/ai TO D/30/91 ItMToat Chaeklao Aeet. lioroot thara Aoeoant/CDa Mm. a/tf ekr9> MMTMt Draforrad Acct. itttara«iea lalBburaaaant Faaam TOTAL INCONE 7/1/91 TO 9/30/91 rAL niNM AVAIUM.I BEFORE EXPENSES 7/1/91 TO 9/30/91 kiatrator ioB Staff Nratarial Saralcoa kfroll Taxaa liloyag Hilaa9a piitli iMoranoa Ipfai Faaa Nataraaoa/Sehoola Kiaa SappUaa liaaaovaClnc bnk ehrg) labaariptloaa IqalpaaBt laa Spaea llaaaoaa Vidao Fund ipa Stock Fund mtm Davalopaant Fund W ML EIPEBPITURES 7/1/91 TO 9/30/91 Liabllltiaai TOTAL FNBDS AUAILABLE 3/31/91 OF FUNDS AS OF 9/30/91 Aeeount 20E CO tranafar) tkara Aoeount Frafarrad Aeet. N^Iieataa of Dapoait TOTAL FUNDS t:pIv. pS-'-mr - 4145.09 729.15 721.32 131.85‘ 10.00 47500.00 6192.59 140.20 1566.44 166.10 627.00 998.00 1698.20 336.76 356.35 315.06 95.98 615.00 237.30 1290.00 100.80 323.55 53.50 TAXES DUE 419772.97 6765.41 53103.99 26000.00 s s 422093.42 6036.26 52462.67 26000.00 20000.00 e a 4126592.35 41737.41 4128329.76 4-22612.83 5.44 4105722.37 4105722.37 V''^.t' r NMtr msT on u Hitt HttckiM fin iMttttt TOUL lINM.OO 30M.00 1.00 112000.00 •07173.01 1I00.S7 10M2.23 sttttttats •111724.01 ^ -«tfw k Mnaiftttut Suff Ul Uniem t- lifil tm •30000.00 2SOOO.OO soo.oo 7200.00 050.00 2000.00 2000.00 4390.00 1290.00 4000.00 1300.00 1400.00 ■j 'iT liMtiiouio/fnHUtti OllMO fpipoiit OiflttlOMt 490.00 790.00 1000.00 4000.00 •7900.00 9049.20 121.30 1941.H at.oo 490.00 174.00 4099.00 0.00 434.00 940.14 317.90 914.40 394.M 43.99 443.29 0.00 1400.00 foni 0120)0.00 •23913.49 tmtUL im Mnmmm..Li if. [• . r’ 00D6E7 KEP 310 sictm oTB nm ovaitq TO-MTE IQUIIIK 0.00 0.00 •97173.01 •0173.01 1U1.54 1995.54 9345.49 2345.49 0.00 0.00 19442.23 19442.23 IttStXSSSSIS 1M1.54 1595.54 •122201.73 •30201.73 7900.00 7500.00 •22500.00 •7900.00 9973.44 4192.99 •17231.33 7740.47 134.20 140.20 •397.70 102.30 1952.14 1544.44 •4400.57 2519.43 202.47 144.10 •510.47 341.93 449.39 427.00 •1990.39 009.41 92.90 990.00 •1244.50 733.90 0.00 0.00 •4099.00 291.00 790.00 0.00 •790.00 900.00 2040.00 1491.20 •5173.00 •27.00 349.52 334.74 •1244.44 793.54 0.00 419.00 •932.50 347.50 342.19 354.39 •1239.44 344.34 249.14 315.04 •914.00 •114.00 179.44 95.90 •339.97 110.43 29.00 0.00 •400.29 241.71 744.39 237.30 •941.49 10.31 1230.00 WOO.-w •4120.00 400.00 22149.94 22134.90 •40097.97 •23932.03 251 311 201 351 301 311 371 71 401 141 341 291 231 ■151 251 351 21 141 iMliaoii lailt •1000.00 •1000.00 0.00 0.00 •1000.00 •0.00 tlMMUl IttiW 1000.00 1000.00 0.00 0.00 1000.00 0.00 A m A ttiiti§900.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 A A A Uffti fttO 1000.00 1000.00 0.00 0.00 1000.00 0.00 Him tfiipmf 1000.00 1000.00 0.00 0.00 1000.00 0.00 A AA 9000.00 3000.00 0.00 0.00 3000.00 0.00 A AA tiMtt lifilipiiit 1SOOO.OO 15000.00 0.00 0.00 19000.00 0.00 A A.A CMtllflMf 4504.04 4504.04 0.00 0.00 4904.04 0.00 MitOlll •27004.04 •27004.04 •0.00 0.00 •27004.04 •0.00 loot moaioni '•I19034.M •90919.49 •22049.94 22134.90 •99904.01 •23932.03 201 SC-.... ■ili.-J... il.X. . ._ _ I-'ft:fc"Fi^ ■ if:: |5;x'' rK I M«i tia. Itvicff IttiMifirtF M>i» CvMd folia MOOO.M tSM.M 5114.11 3014.74 1012.05 2403.11 1034.25 0230.04 7509.14 •1.47 15000.00 tsttitieitittt 0S310S.S0 PMir fiM imiitM Mm fiM miiiiio 23932.03 S2027.73 mu. 1737.41 27425.20 0.00 mil -t'f 'W' ■■ •* li' Spccitl FmOi 3ri qtr ti—<— 3t4 Otr 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 323.55 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.50 OiUiiCE 10000.00 03500.00 05114.14 03014.70 0409.30 02502.31 010H.25 14230.04 07509.14 0-1.47 014944.50 0477.05 052427.73 074559.74 0105722.37 i;- >-r fl tW: $' ih i: m p r •fi s: ■fv K-• •v tr fy ?■ :■ 't •:V i--: ?i::^ Joint PoM<*rs Agree«ent/Bylaw* Rovisions Rocomnondationa Par noating wxth legal counsel Oct. 22., 1991 Qy{- Meeting today# Toe Creighton and I discussed the changes recoaaanded by the connittee and approved by the Executive Coaaittee regarding these docueenta. He reconaended the Coaaission take action as follows: 1. Joint Powers Aoreeeentt Due to the nature of the document and the process Involved in aaending it# matters of procedure should not be introduced into this document unless it would leave the Coeeission open to negligence in its responsibility to uphold the agreeeent. Tasks originally assigned as a responsibility to a particular officer, now assigned speoifioally to staff# are still the responsibility of the officer. *■*** incorrect notations to eeetinas and aonua.l nroblem he recoesends we correct bv amending the to Article Vll. Section 4 Cpaoe 6) of the jQllkt 2. Bylaws1 Here# there are several areas that he recomeends be aeended to reflect policy changes. Old language is in parentheses; new language is underlined, a) Article 10# Section 3 be deleted. e> Article VIII# Section 1 to read: Regular meetings of the Board shall be held <monthlv)durinc the months of Februaxj^# Hay# Aucust and November on the third Tuesday of (every) ih± month at at a location designated by the Board. The Executive imt on the alternate months at the same time to be designated bv the Committee._XBb. Board shall conduct its annual meeting in Hav 9t each c) Article VI# Section 7 to read: "(The treasurer of the Coseiasion may give bond as required by the Board# at Coeeission ewnense.) All officers shall be bonded at the CQeeiSSiOll.*.A expense....” d) Article V# Section 1 to read: "...Orders# checks and drafts shall be signed by the chair or vice chair and the treasurer or assistant treasurer. Authority to implement a check stamp procedure for use bv the administrator or designated. indivi-dual shall be at the discretion of the Commission. . . . * e> Artiole VIII# Section 10# Toe recommends we either delete any reference to an agenda order# or amend it to reflect current order and include public forua. r>■ If* u* * i». ^rl-. •15 fc?'. hK'r k’ rr'- f tr- rr: r^. ■/' 1- r"< { y. ft- ijj, i*% Itr- i 't. K'^ |. r-r. F IIf f> Regarding our drafting and adoption of a*i annual budget« two thingst 1. Ws can adopt anvtiwe before August 15, though It is difficult to do so with any accuracy or sense of where your current budget will hold or fail; however, if the cities wish to have budgets by July 15, a procedure can be established to aeconeodate that request. 2. Each year the budget has been revised once frsnehlse fees have been received and any carryover froa the previous year has been identified. This revised budget Iujl never been sent to the cities for approval. Tea and 1 aoree that this aav place the Coeaission in .leopardv of its rasDonslbilitv to the franchise aoreeaent in the tfh oE. aspanditure of funds. Toa strongly receaaends that tlm revised budget for 1992 back to the cities _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ However, in subsequent years, he reooaaends the budget be drafted to include a notation with an asterisk that states soaething to the effect that *...lf franchise fees do not or are not less than I of the estlaate bf this budget, the cities grant the Coanission authority to revise this budget without further approval. If the fees fall to aeet this test, the Coaaission shall return the revised budget to the aeaber cities for approval.* g) Tea also reooaaends tins be spent to assemble a policy and procedures handbook. This would involve going back to the first official ainutes of the LMCCC and noting in the handbook by action or resolution number, any action that implemented new or affected standing policies or procedures. ■ « _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I It t’L & % It fMh '.t:-. H,. :■■ i. ' f r >; •^tv 1-^ :■*-•. r y f “ ■ E 1992 JOB DESCBIPTIOB . , . . * ^ , • •(Propw^ ch*i*9«* *r# BOt«d •• und«rlln*d copy. Delotiona ir* not notod; ploaoo refer to 1991 job deecriptlon tor varietlone.) Poeltxon: Adalnletrator Salary ranget $28*000-933«000 Banefitai Per eCfactive personnel policy Oualifieatlonat Video-production experience and adeinistratlve akilla adaifiatrative experience and/or degree preferred. Prior frs chxae POSITION OBJECTIVES ^ „To coordinate the activities of the Lake Minnetonka Cable Coaaunlcatlons Coeeiseion (LHCCC)e To act aa liaison beteeen the LMCCC, cable coepany* inatitutions, cities, access users* and the public. To proeote the auareness and the developaent^o£ coeeunity television. CABLE JUMlNlSnUTOB DUTIES ^ Serves as staff to 28 aeeber full Coaaisslon and 7 eeaber Executive Coeeittee. Puvulops agendas and research saterials* provides notice of aeetlngs* attends all CoMission and Coeeittee seetlngs* saintains record of elnutes of all Coesission ***Becelves and investigates coeplaints concerning the operation of the cable systee. Ausures franchisee's oonpliance with all applicable ordinances and laws and upon deterninatUn of any violation of the ease* takes necessary and appropriate action to enforce the applicable law. * - * w Monitors the franchisee's perforsence and adherence to the teres of the franchise including* but not United to* construction schedules. Installation policy* rates* operational standards* naintenance* continuity and the provision of support for access and consunity progranning. pfopares Connisslon annual budgets and guarterly and annual financial stateoents. Attends nestings* seninars* workshops* and conventions on cable natters* providing reports to Connisslon. Atteiida a eitw council neetina of each senber citv at least once per vear (with a goal ggff) to discuss cable connisslon activities and issues* Makes such recoaaendatlons and reports to the Coaaisslon as nay be deened necessary to the regulations and developnent of the cable coesunications systee. MCEBS Act : .ETBATOB DUTIES CoMilMioii Ifi th# d#v#lopMiit of in iiplwntition of iccm policiii ind procedures. Pronotss awareness* developnent* and use of local prograaalng and studios to aenber cities* institutions* and the public. Coordinates nublio relations efforts on behalf of the CosniSiion and thg cgaaupity ehaaaal to further awareness of the facilities and their use. Coordinates.the oreduetien of a quarterly newsletter and annually updates as needed. tha LHCCC-Channel 21 brochure. Hires staff aa authorised by Coesission* and trains staff in egulpeent operation and policy inplenentation. Conducts annual review of all staff. ^ygypooo the recueata and racoanendations for eouipaent purchases for the studios and BBEM —EMtMBTHdltlftlW.Conaisaion for appropriations. gg^gg^p aonthlv cabla-issues talk show produced_bv access. coordinator and/or staff. ■>7;- 1991 JOB DCSCRIPTIOM Positiont A<tolnlfltr«tor Salary rangat Mona aatablxahad/currant $30,000 Banatitst Par affactiva paraonnel policy POSITIOM OBJECTIVES To coordxnata tha activitiaa of tha Laka Ninnatonka Cabla Coaaunicationa Coaaxaaion (LMCCC). To act aa liaiaon bataaan tha LMCCC, cabla coapany, inatitutiona, citiaa, acceaa uaara* and tha public. To proaota tha awaranaaa and tha davalopaent of coaaunity telaviaion. CABLE AOMlRlSTIATOt DUTIES Sarvaa aa ataff to 28 aaabar full Coaaiaaion and 7 aaabar Exacutiva Coanittaa. bavalopa apandaa and raaaarch aatariala, provldaa notlca of aeatlnga, attanda all Coaaiaaion and Coaaittaa aaatinga, aaintaxna racord of axnutas of all Coaaxaaxon aaatxnga. Baeaavaa and invaatigataa coaplainta concarnxng tha oparation of tha cabla ayataa. Aaauraa franehxaaa*a coaplianca with all applicabla ordxnancaa and laua and upon dataraination of any violatxon of tha aaaa, takaa nacaasary and approprxata actxon to anforoa tha applicabla laa. Nonitora tha franchiaaa*a parforaanca and adharanca to tha taraa of tha franchxae including# but not liaitad to# conatruction achadulaa# inatallation policy, rataa# operational atandarda# aaintananca# continuity and tha provision of aupport for accaaa and connunity progranning. Praparaa Conniaaion annual budgata and quarterly and annual financial atataaants. Attanda naatinga# aaainara# workahopa, and convantxona on cabla aattara, providing raporta to Conniaaion. Hakaa auoh raooanandationa and raporta to tha Coaaiaaion aa nay ba daaaed nacaasary tha ragulatlona and davalopnant of tha cabla coaaunicationa ayataa. ACCESS ADNISISTSATOE DUTIES Aaalata Coaaiaaion in tha davalopnant of an laplaaontatlon of accaaa policias and proeaduraa. Pronotaa auaranaaa# davalopnant, and uaa of local prograaaing and studios to aaabar citiaa, inatitutiona# and tha public. liiraa ataff aa authoriaad by Coaaiaaion, and trains staff in aquipaant oparation and policy inplanantation. Conducts annual raviau of all ataff. Producaa prograaa# and aaaiata othar in all aspects of producing progtaaa for local aooaaa Schadulas aquipaant for aaintananca and rapaira, avaluataa and raaaarchaa aquipaant and studio naada and nakaa purchaaa racoaaandaciona to tha Conniaaion and francnisaa. Schadulaa'prograaa for cablacaating, and achadulaa aquipaant and studio tiaa for accaaa uaara. ¥Sr-I- POSITION DESCRIPTION POSITION OMECTIVCS To coordinate tha activities of the Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Coanfstlon. To act as liaison between the Coorilsilon, cable company. Institutions, cities, access usa^tt (Imi public. To pronota tha awareness and the development of Conwunlty Television. CAILE AOMINISTPATON DUTIES Serves as staff to 28 aoaber Full Commission and 7 mamber Executive Coeiiilttee. Conalsslon aaetlngs. Necalves and Investloates complaints concerninp the operation of the cable syfttOT. Auuru rrmehUM's eamlUiK. with .11 .ppUcbl. or<lln.ne«» «wl l«« upon dataralnatlw* of any violation of the same, takes necessary and appropriate action to anfo. ha applicable law. Monitors the franchisee's performance and adherence to the terms of the franchise access and cCMwnlty programming. Prepares Comilsslon annual budgets and quarterly and annual financial statements. Attends meatings. seminars, workshops, and conventions on cable matters, providing reports to Commission. Makes such reconaendatlons and reports to the Comelsslon as may be deemed necessary to tha regulation and development of the cable eoieaunlcatioos system. ACCESS ADMINISTRATOR DUTIESAssists CosMlsslon In the development of end Implementation of access policiesMid procedures. ^renntes e»Mreness« development* end use of local programming and studios to ■maber cities* Institutions* and the public. Hires staff as authorlaed by Conmtsston. and trains staff In equipment operation add policy I sip lamentation. Produces programs* and assist others In all aspects of producing programs for local access. Schedules equipment for maintenance and repairs, evaluates and researches aquIpsMnt and studio needs and makes purchase recommendations to the Gonmlsslon and franchisee. Schedules programs for cablecasting* and schedules equipment and studio time for access users. ___. . V’- 1992 JOB OCSCSIPTIOR (PropiMMi oliMycc •r* iiot#<l •• und*rlln*d copy« Delation* nr# not noted; pleue refer to 1991 Job dMoriptien for verietlone.) Pooltloni Aceee* Coordinator Salary ran^at 97.SO-dlO.00/hr Bonofltat Per effective peraonnel policy Qy^^£yi^(4onet De9ree in Coeaunicationa or related field froa an accredited university* college or technical achool; at leaat on* year of experience vorlcin^ in video prodeotlon or In a training environeent; knowledge of reeot* and atudio production, the Mchanica and technique* of editing, and aoae coaputer knowledge or experience; a ability to ttork eell with the public and to work Independently with little auperwiaionf a aenaa of atyle. creativity and energy a auat. POBITIOB OBJECTIVES >r nroaotina awareneaa of coeeunitv televiaion and the uae ot to the LMCCC of the Excelaior Coeaunitv TV atudio need* of the Orono Coeeunitv TV atudio aa directed by the adeiniatrator.^ ooiimteere <o the production of video procraaexnQ for coeaunatv televiaion. televlaion bv producing procraeninc aa oirectec by. tKo 0*01oiotrator and aaaiatino in the nroductxon of pfooraaeino bv volunteer* OUTIBS IBCLUOB BUT ARE NOT LINITED TOt Agceae Coordinator report* directly to the adeiniatrator and ia reviewed by the aaae^ Bueorwiae the daily reapenetbilitleaand aeaianaenta of atudio ataff and aake report* to the adeAniatratori Produee proootlonal and preaentation video eateriala: Prodeoe video training oateriala; Teach acceaa eerkahopa. but lieit offering to 3 per quattet? Coordinate the playback of prooraMinq on_ChanneX-Ui. aMioti#d Md othTg in til VIlyPfooucino proqra— for eoeeueitv televieioni Videotape newthlv cable coeaiaaion aeetinca. Hake report* htoootMw to the adalniatrator on ecuipaent atatua and need*; Hake rpoo^endatAona on eouinaent aurchaaea. acquire eatiaatea on coat* and secure acheduiea for approved purchaaea and/or repair of ecuipaent; Schedule oroemee for eebiaeaatine on channel 21. coordinate outside orocraaeAnq and ecbedele eeuieent and studio tiee for acceaa user*. Keep equipeent clean and ready to use; HaiPtain existing access files and develop new ones; Aaaiat in lono-ranaa planning for the facilities. - I?:-' If. h k.w U; ~ --r-:' L>- U. ^ r; ■;i ■-i ■ * If'*:? ^te- ^K‘-.:M> ^,'c" f:-- 0 0-I'■,lr 'i:ir :■-' f-^f.Pr- M: ffy aL; - V- fefc m- l'|j:. Ifs. ■ t=:.;’: L^‘-''' 1991 JOB DE8CBIPTI0N Positiont Production Coordinator Salary ranyat i7.S0-d9.00/hr Banafltat Par affaotiva paraonnal policy Qualifleatlonat Oayraa In Coaaunieatlona or ralatad fiald froa an accradltad univarsity, eolla^a or taehnical school; at laaat ona yaar of axparlanca working in vidao production or in a training anvironaant: knowladge of raaota and studio production, tha aaohanios and taehniquas of editing, and soaa coaputar knowladga or axparlanca; a ability to work wall with tha public and to work indapandantly with little suparvision; a sansa of styla, craatlvity and anargy a oust posiTioa opnviEV To assist tha adainlstrator in davaloping training, proaotional and outraach aatarials) taaeh basic production, aditing and studio production skills to coaaunity rasidants, studanta, spacial>intaraat groups through advartlsad, ragularly schadulad workshops; assist accass producars in tha production of prograjis; produce aonthly and spaeial*intarast in-housa prograaaing: assist in tha ganaral aalntananea of tha aquipaent and in troubla*shooting; assist in afforts to incraasa coasunity awaranass and davalop awaranass activltias. OVTIIS INCLVOS SOT AKB NOT LIMITED TO: Produca proaotional and prasantation vidao aatarials; Produca vidao training aatarials; Taaeh accass workshops, work with adueational raquaata; Produca aonthly in*housa prograas Kaap aguipaant olaan and raady to usa Notify Adainlstrator of aqulpaant in naad of repair Nalntain axiating accass filas and davalop new ones 8arva as part'tiaa staff for Orono studio i--^^ iftiATnifA i ifi i w p f. % |rh: r'-’- ■ .«'■ ''r= Wm If?; i,:p- I- rtr.r- r?;;s- fc*; . I-';. &■i'V‘, #■' i'- . ••- y ”y S: I" pv* ;v. JOB DESCRIPTION PCSITIONt Productioff Coordinator DESatlPTIOHt DutlM to Includo but not llnltod tos Adnlnlotrator in dovoloplng training. pr<»otle»«l •■><! «.tr«.e»i Mt.ri.U; t«ch Siting and studio production olclUn to eoasunlty roaldent*. r?lJi!lt.! opIoJal-lStoroot group, through sohodulad uorkohop.j clot aecc ArASrHAlnoi Kolot In tho Jonoral nainton.nco of tho oqulp^-nt JSrincbl2*.hootlng, ...l.t in offort. to Iner.c c....n„.ty aworonoM and davalop aaaranaaa activitlaa. 0UALTFICATIOHSt D«nr«a in Coanunlcatlona or ralatad field from an accpaditad unlvaraity. college taohnieal aehooli at laaat ona year of •**P*'’J"®* ;®^5i2^or eldao production or in a training anvironaant; knoeladge of raaota and atudio production, tha aachanica and aditing^ and aoaa oonputar knowladga or •’*P*^‘*”®** {otir aork call with tha public and to aork J"<**P*"***"^iy ^ auparviaioni a aanaa of atyla. creativity and energy a anat. SALARY RAMSEt #7.50 - #9.00 par hour BSHEFITSt Full-tina banaflta policy and updated nacaaaary. atated in personnel Coaaiaaion deeaa I.. tet. .1 a la^r.W. : .nd... . - i .m. .. ■tk J-t.; i fftrm Minnetonka Cable Comnuinlcatlons Commission443 OAK STREET • EXCELSIOR. MINNESOTA 55331 ♦ (612)474-5539 DATE I TOt FROM I REt Ootob*r 30, 1991 LHCCC HCHBER CITIES J«nnif«r Watts 1990 CENSUS RESULTS • IMPACT ON MEMBER VOTES Last sonth wa raeaivad a copy of tha 1990 csnsua. Tha Coaalsslon usas this docuaant to datarslna tha nusbar Of votas sllottad to aaoh of its aaabars - basad on tha total nuabar of housaholds, par tha-Joint powars agraamant. Attaohad ara tha findings froa this update. Plaasa nota Shorawood gainad ona vota par diractor dua to an incraasa in housaholds. All othar aaabar cities raaain unaffected by tha oansus count, as it relates to tha votes on tha Coaaission. If you have any questions regarding these findings, plaasa address than insadiataly to tha Chair Barb Brancal, as these nunbars will be in affect at tha Novaabar full Coaaission seating. Thank you. anot /Jw V f::.' tn RESULTS OF 1990 CENSUS MBMBBB CITY HOUSEHOLDS • OF REPS TQUl V9TS9 old now old now OBEPHAVEN EXCELSIOR CREEMHOOO LONG LAKE HEOINA NTKA BEACH HIMMETRISTA OROMO ST* BONIFACIUS 8H0REV00D SPRIMO PARK TOMKA BAY VICTORIA MOOOLAND 1324 1160 2S0 747 1007 204 1195 2613 398 2026 741 577 756 176 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 3 1 1 1 1 4 4 2 2 4 2 4 6 2 4 2 2 2 2 (Eooh elty rocoivoa ono (1) voto par 1«000 houaoholds or Srootion thoroof* por dlroctor.) 4 4 2 2 4 2 4 6 2 6 2 2 2 2 -- - NCTA & Cities Nail Uown standards•7 GARY KIM A iMc and city Begotiaton I- (tacbad a fioal agtccmeal W oBpropoaedaaiionaliach- aical fttaMtah for cabla TV laR TlMUiday at 4:4S aJB^ alter m alNi^ aaaakM Ibal left icptv* The eoaprcbeahra 14-paga UdMaOaMwpictwcsutity ilaadBvda for all cable TV sy»> teas of 1.000 sabecriben a Hm eg recae a, wbicb dty aal industry officials win bo adqpled in total by the FCC; wa signed and Advisors; Coaaunity An* team Television Association: Qmferenoe of Mayois: and Na* dooal AssociatioB of Countia. Key provisions would raise ainianm noise perforaance for systems from 36 decibels canier-to-noia ratio op to 4A dB C/N within one year. Syi teas would then have an extra three yean a posh numbers up a43dB. Where converien or de- fcrambkis are used, however, tbea munben are relaxed by IdB. Opera tors would also be re* qabed to deliver a signal level of 3 dBaV a tfM end of each 100*foot sebao ibef drop cable, and feed each authori^ cus* tamer outlet wHb signals at 0 dBm V. TVs and VGts are a work best a that level. Ibe fuks ^ can for testinc of key radfo ftequeocy paraneten twice a year a a least six, widely scattered locations reflecting the geographic area served by each syaem. For syaema larger than 12.300 sub scribers. one additional tnt point is required for SEENCrA,PAGB48 Mftcls system tf 1.000 sobs or More 40 dl carrier-te-mist level ini vpv 43 dV C/N 3 years later Sets FMradtetipal levels ferlsttim Ian rsaaval ef desed- captioniaq data Resiles baseband sifiul testini every 4 yeers 48 MalllihaanaNew Oei ahatl.im -------------------------------------------------------— NCTA & Qties Not Down Standard s cotmnmnonrAOEi ___ each addidonal 12.300 subecribera served. man s leader^p and foua^s wi_1^1 fcir^TA tffitnfw for his side wtule rh\nniiing tfaa we na balnesi^ lengthy process took. **Each ade gave something and each side got aotn^ung.** be said. In the pioeea a tdadonthip may . A * *____— U may also be the most iB^- rniifi sio^rds Joren'i i oran'tapiM'tapiMor^V and the industry *nha win shock many.** said Krames: ingpoU it'stbcfiruitofacloaa^ T 4 . ^ yp jddaw asw I dbacafaxi is cxpecmd.Neidi0 Bailey ^aa MCn I m Kramer could predict what the ...* ‘ 8 PCCsmuld do urith die proposal. OT how long it might trice to It ap- oadtlMrsidsloaoakaiuvcmiMtBeinieB. posed tula al» would, fer-bk io ^ tirn^ require^ BdleypidadhisnegoliadBgooumeipetts.'lcan ’t meri.ffi «. •The Wetland Conservation Act of 1991: the l.V’th V Interim Program Th»MlnnmotaBoanfatW$mran(/SoaR*$ourc»s (BWSR)lsttfsiat9atimlnlstmav^g9ncyforthe Wetland Conserva- MnteentedSeclidlDtfwBWSa 612-296^797, or i-90oia-9747. TTie regulatory provisions of the Wetland Conservation Act take place in two phases. The first phase is an interim program prohibiting wetland alteration that begins Jan. 1.1992. and lasts through July 1,1993. After July 1,1993, a permanent program begins. The programs provide exemptions and also alkjw landowners to "replace ” wetlands through an approved replacement plan. So what exactly does the Wetland Conservation Act mean for locai governments and landowners? And when do their responsibilities begin? BtlwMn now and Jan. 1,1992. • Local government units (LGUs) must decide which LGU will administer the interim provisions of the act (BWSR is available to facilitate this discussion between LGUs.) Although soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs) or any LGU with permitting authority can administer the interim provision s , the permanent program is more restrictive: only counties and cities can administer the permanent program in Greater Minnesota, and ortly cities, townships and water management organizations can administer the permanent program in the Metro Area. It seems logical to consider gl'^ responsibility fbr the interim program to the LGU that will ultimately administer the permanent program. • The designated LGU should notify the BWSR that they have accepted responsibility for administering the act If nc LGU takes responsibility fOr the program, landowners with nonexempt wetlands will be prohtolled from alteririg them. Moreover, since the BWSR will not assume local administration of the program, landowners will have no orre to determine exemptions or approve replacement plans. eThe BWSR wi develop administrative guidelines fbr the interim program. After Nov. 11.1991. a copy of theguidelines may be obtained from the BWSR (612-296-3767). The guidelines will be open to written comment until Dec. 6. 1991. The comments and adoption of the guidelines will be considered at the Dec. 18.1991. meeting of the BWSR. AftorJan. 1,1992. e After consultatfon with the Wetland Heritage Advisory Committee (a nine-member committee consisting of the commissioners of agriculture arxl natural resources, and se^'en others appointed by the goverrKir), rule making fbr the permanerrt program will begin. • The BWSR will provide training to LGUs concerning the interim program. • The BWSR arxf LGUs will work together to let landowners know that they must get approval from the LGU befbre altering a wetland. #The LGU must decide if a wetland activity is exempt; if it Is. the LGU might want to consider issuing a "certlffcate of exemption.* Although this certificate is not required, it will help the landowner quickly explain the wetland's status to enfbrcement ofRctals. I ____ I # The oommissjonar of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) is responsible for enforcement * of the act Although conservation officers are primarily responsible for this enforcement, other peace officers will assist the DNR. • Exemptions include: * the proposed activity is in a wetland sut^ect to federal farm program Swampbuster require* * the wetland has a cropping history or was in 'set aside* six of 10 years prior to Jan. 1,1991; * the activity is in a wetland that was enrolled in the federal Conservation Reserve Program, was cropped six out of 10 years prior to enrollment, and has not been restored with public or private assistance; * the activity Is In a wetland that has received a commenced determination by the Agricultural Stab izat ion arxi Conservation Service (ASCS); * the activity is In a type 1 wetiarxl on agricultural land, except for bottomland hardwood type 1 wettarxls; * the activity is in a type 2 wetland that is two acres or less located on agricultural land; * the activity Is in a wetland created solely as a result of beaver dam construction, or blockage of culverts through public or private roads; * the activity is necessary to re^ and maintain public or private drainage systems, as long as wetlan ds that have been in existence for more than 20 years are not drained; * the activity is related to development projects and ditch improvement projects that have received at least preliminary approval within five years before Aug. 1,1991; * certain activities related to Co^. of Engineer permits, forest management, aquaculture, wild rice production, and routine maintenance of highways, streets and utilities. • Larxlowners proposing nonexempt activities have these options: * The landowner arxl the LQU can agree that the landowner will replace the wetland within one year of the effective date of the rules governing the permanent program and that the repiacemant wM abide by those rules. (The rules will be effective about Jutyl, 1993.) The landowner can replace the wetland acre for acre (at a 2:1 ratio for norvagriculturalwetlyids andata1:1 ratio for agriculturaiwetiands) and type for type before or during the wetland activity. If the rep la cement is required by a permitting authority otlier than the LGU, the LGU may defer to that rep la cement plan, providing that the replacement requirements are at least 1:1 (ag) and 2:1 (non-ag). • The LGU must establish a technical evaluation panel. The panel is responsible for making wetland deineatlona . resolving questions concerning exemptions and providing guidance on replacement plans. The LGU approves the replaoement plans. ^ statute, this panel consists of a professional employee of the SWCD, a BWSR employee and an engineer from the LGU. (The panelists may add other members from the pubKc or private sectors to provide additional expertise.) •The legislature appropriated funds to SWCDs to serve as an information clearinghouse about the act and to provide training to local officials. ■ .1. ■ :::■■ :l. V PROPOSED INTERIM PROCESS Landowner (l.o.):Any Wetland Activity LGU Contacted Exempt Activity Certification of exemption tosued to 1.0. for specific sKs and activity. (Exemption cert, la filed by LQU If queetlone arise) Not Exempt Replaceraent Options Future Replacement > 7/1/93 Replace Now (2:1 or 1:1) type for type Defer to a consistent local scheme 1.0. agrees to terms & LGU certifies 1.0. does not agree to terms 1.0. proceeds with activity 1.0. prohibited .from Commencing If Commenced, Enforcement Action Memorandum fjKW i 5 1991 To:TH 12 Policy, Technical, and Citizen ’s Committees From:Steve Hay Date:November 12, 1991 Re:November Committee Meetings The legulariy scheduled meetings for the TH 12 Policy, Technical, ana t-.iuzen s Committees iwtf not be held this month. You will receive a notice and agenda for your next meeting. The dates of these meetings have not been set at this dme. oe: Cities of: DeUs Indepeiidi Long Lake Maple Plain Medine Oiono Wayxaia Fnuklm Township R; pS. KW i 5 1991 Policy, Technical, and Citizen ’s ccting. The dates of these meetings i METROPOLITAN SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS Vohimt 8, Nufflbar 3 FALL 1991 URBAN UPDATE Metro Wetlands and the Wetland Conservation Act toy M. Nelton, BWSR Tht 1901 legislature passed the Wetlands Conserva tion Act (WCA). The act was necessary because there is a large pubHc value placed on wetlands and yet many waUandi seem to tal through the cracks" of protective regutalloa The WCA alms at protecting our existing wet land base through legal protection, financial Incentives, and (at the last resort.) mitigation. In tMa overview I wll touch on the Issues from the WCA that have the potentially largest effect on the Twin CWesarea. Clnce the WCA is dKMed into 11 Articles, l wto uee these articles as reference points In describing the WCA Article One: This articie Is devoted to policy and dascrites the public functiorts and values of wetlands. The articie also states that the WCA Is not intended to diminish any larvlowner rights regarding access or tmpMt. AmdaTWo: WaterMarwgementOrganIzatlonor- ganizallon plans must Identify high priorSy areas for wet- bnd presentation, enharwement. restoration, and estab- Nahmera. The Board of Water and Sol Resources (BWSRI wB develop^crlterla to determine the pt^ic valua of weUartds. these criteria wll be formulated through the stale ’s formal rulemaking process and wll ^|uUe the replacement of wetlands beginning July i. AiBde Three: This article describes the Permanent Welland Preserx ’-is Program. Under this program, a land- owner can apply to B\A^R to enroil a type 1.2. or 3 wet land and adjacent land In a permanent easement pro gram. Payinenl rates wW be based on the town^ equalized average astimated market value (Ef4V) of agrlnilural property for both agricuitutal lands and non- agrlciBural hnds within the seven county metropolitan area. The payment rate wll be 50 percent of EMV for agrlcultival larxf In the metropoTlian area. The rate will be 20 percent of EMV for non-agricultural land to be en- roled as a permarrera wetlarxi preserve. Artlele Four: This articie describes yet another pro gram, the Wetland Preservation Area Program. To be eliglile for this program. Umd must be in areas dsslg- rwlMf as high prtorly wetland areas. These high prurity wadand areas wB be Identified by your WMO pans and approved by the BWSR. Once an area has been desig nated as a high priority wetland area, wetlands within the area are elignie to be declared Wetland Preservation Areas. After a wetland preservation area is approved, land- ownere can enrol wetlands and adjacent knds and receive a tax exemption on these lands. A restrictive covenant Is placed on the enrolled land for at least eight years. Since this program affects property taxation, the county wB be Involved. The state will reimburse revenues lost to the county from the wetiand preserva tion areu. .continued on next page From the Chair by Dorothy Waltz, Chair, Dakota SWCD Wetlands - One Piece of the Puzzle |o.A personal experience; A tittie over ten years age my husbarxi and I bought 21/2 acres of land In Dakot.;- County for a homesite. Almost one acre of our land was part or a wetland with standing water throughout the spring and early summer every year. It was a great }iace for widiife, and we enjo^ the many varieties of }lrds erxl mammals who took advantage of It. During the decade that we have lived there, our wet land has changed- li*s r>ot a wet-land anymore. It’s dry land. Except In the wettest times of the year, we can walk across It without even getting our feet wet. Water- fowl no longer visit us, even during migration. Oh yes, It's stW Important habitat, and it stil slows down the runoff of heavy rains, and It probably stB does a good job of fikering out pcButants. But k’s rapldiy becoming sorrwthing other than a wettand. What has happened to our wetland - and what Is its signMcartce for this articie? Sad to say. the degradation of our own little wetland Is a metaphor for the entire wet lands story of the last few years. Wetlands are only one part of the much bigger conservation "puule." And without the rest of the puzzle pieces in place, our wet land has been losT even though It hasn't been filled or drained or paved over. That is the point of this article: Our wetiand has suffered because not enough attention is being paid to alt the pieces of the conservation puzzle. Our wetland is 'protected." Each of the five lan- ' vers who live around It has kept at least a 100 toot .. .tfer strip between the wetland and any cultivated (read feitlizer and pesticide use) lawn. The problem lies rtsewhere: Erosion from further up the watershed, which is in arK>ther city, arxl over which we have no con trol, has been allowed to deposit much sit in our wet land. Road and bikepath construction have added their load of sit and debris, thus contributing to the demise of our wetland. Just protecting the wetland itself was not enough. Erosion control and control of upland flooding were also needed. Is the same thing happening to the entire conserva tion "puzzle?" Have we as conservationists and environ mentalists arxi units of government become so wrapped up in protecting wetlands that we have forgotten that there Is much more to preserving our natural resour ces? It’s easy to get enthusiastic about wetlands - today’s lashioruble'' environmental cause. That's where the exciting ducks and the pretty songbirds and the endangered ^nts arel They're much "sexier* than plain oil dirt rurming off a field or erosion from a rww development choking the storm sewers before the first house has even been bull. Wetlarxls are certainly important. But so Is control ling sol erosion even when It's not right beside a wet land. So are reducing herbicide and pesticide runoff to protect water quality m our streams and rivers and lakes. And so are conservation tllage and windbreaks and reduced energy input and sediment basins and ter races arxl sit fences, even though some people may get tired of hearing us harp on them year after year. Success in the current "glamour" task -wetland protec tion - won’t be worth much unless we also keep promot ing all the other "old fashioned" conservation practices. In fact, as our own tittle wetlarxj shows, we will not even save our precious wetlands unless we also do all those other things too' «1 T' ^ t II (v \ # W0llandt...continutd AitIcItFIvt: TMs article describes a program to ere- ate wedands through either establishment or re^oratlon of drained lands. As with Article Four, the wetland to be created must be In an area MentMed as a high priority area by both BWSR an^ the WMO plan. Thalandawnor li taquirod to have a perpetual conser- vation easement placed on the wedand area. In return, the enrolee wl raoelvt ooet-share funding for construc tion of the wetland plup a payment from the WMO or Courv Board In return for ihe state conservation easement. Participation In thia restoration program by WMOs and counties wM be vohjniary. AiddeSIx: This ardcie describes the new protective -----e that wB beagled to existing wetlands that "fall the crackr of ct 'i^guiatory programs. This is the most com^i! .41:^ in the WCA. Wetlands protected u ..^^r existing programs are not af fected this bM. Per exiin.ple. the'tNibiic waters" protected under the currert O^rtment of Natural Reeouroee PNA) permit program remains unchanged. WjMands regulated under the Swampbuster provision ad- mMstaredlw the U8DA are not affected. But. If a wetland b not regulated by this or any other existing p^ram, nwre than Ibely » wB fa« under the WCA. Thb article also defines wedarxls. For the purpose of the WCA a wetland has the following c^racteristi^: 1. a predomlnonce of hydric sols 2. b Inundated or saturated by surface or ground wtter M a freguency and duration sufficient to support a prevalence of hydrophytic vegetation typically ad^ed for rts a prevalence3. under normal dreumstances. supi of such vegetatioa To ptuleuiUie above described weUands, rules wli be developed by Jdy 1.1933, by BWSR to be imdemented b)^ metropolitan chy. township, or WMO. The rules for wetimd prelection wB stress tNMdisturbimce of wettarxls must be avoided tf possible: mitigation should be used only as a last resort ThelodresortinlticHaionplaiisor"re- ptacemera ptane* must be approved by me above mert- tlonad loeal governmental unit (LQU). Replaoement plans wB require hvo things. Flmtre- placemeril wB usuaHy be require^ in (tw same watershed. Second, the replaoement ratio vvB ae at a rath) of 2:1 for non^wsdandsandl:tforagw<Mands. The ratio refers to value for value and acre for acre. As Indicated earibr. thb procesa wB be developed by rub. Technical deter- minalions ra -ting to these replacement plans wB be made w Mmel wB consbt of b fCOTandand the LGU. I L l > r If the landowner and the LGU cannot arrive at an ac ceptable replacement pian. bndowner can be compen sated for not being abb to o.ain or fill the wetland. The compensation amount wB t« 50 percent of the average equalized EMV In the township. Conservation officers and peace officers wB be called upon to enforce the regulatory aspect of the WCA. Final rules for thb articb wll be develop by July 1.1993. Afticb Basren: Thb article describes the interim prohibi tion that wll be in place from Janutuy 1.1992, through July 1,1993. FBIrig. burning, or draining of wetlands b banned duringthbperiodunlessthearavitybtobeex' emfy or the wedand acreage wB be recced. During thb interim period, an SWCO or LGU may deter- mlrw wsmpllofis or csrtlfy that a watiaixi wll ba raplac^ if drained or fBed. The SWCO or LGU may charge a fee to offset aosts for adminbtering thb certification provbioa Artfob Eight: This artlde deals mainly with northern Minnesota peatlands and b also caled the "Minnesota Peatbnd Protection AcT. Scientific and natural areas wB te estabibhed in which the ONR wB develop management Articb NInr Th-' DNR b required to adopt rules to as sume the U.S. Aimy Corps of Engineers (USuOE) WeBand r ermit Program by Febriiary 1.1993. The goverrxx wfll apply to the Environmental Protection Agency to assume authority lor thb program by March 1,1993. Articb Ten: Thb article b a miscellsneous section. Some Items discussed are: -wetbnd repbeement can be Included In the cost of a ditch repafo -DNR and BWSR must report annually to the legislature on wetbnds; -wetlands under a preservation easement must be as- ed at a wetland virtue; and -potential ownafSof tax forfeit bnd must be notified of v/etbnds present and that the land b not eligible for pay ment under conservation easement programs. Af^sb 11: Thb article addresses funding of the WCA. Sbff at tiie BWSR arxl DNR will be Increased to address of Ute WCA. I hope you are stB with me. As you can see. thb b a complicated pbee of legbbtion that wB require good com Tdinication and cooperation with local unlb of govern ment to administrate. BWSR b planning c major training effort in cooperation with the RAnnesob Association of Conservation Dbtricb. Information on these sessions should be avalable In early 1992 by conbedng your WMO or SWCCv Urba*' Update/spt^'j( at/four i/mes ayearby the Astfoc/'j- ticn Metropolitm. 1 and Watat Conservation Districts ano the Board ot Hatar and Soil Besourcas. Editon Mark »'*bon. ASSOCUnON OF METROPOUTAN SOIL AND WATER CON-SiJiVATlOri DISTRICTS 2095 DeUiwarf A ve. Mettdota Heights. MN 531 IS 0 *)J ..... jlli ?ji!. L_‘J %. / rto i*" bernardson ' ORONO, CITY OP >*0 BOX 66 crystal bay, Mr, 55323 ,,, V'v ./<! USl'iJ3IAG:r 50 .2 ~ «r Bide Rat* U. S.Ro*li^ m Paw ZPmtrrnHo. 171 SLPmd,UH V i 9 1991 r •- I CITY of OROXO FoilUfiteBoitf Cryni Bay, MhaHaoia 55323-0066 November 15, 1991 Senator Gen Olson 125 State Office Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Dear Gen: Gabriel Jabbour and I are writing to you to ask fo- youi assistance in bringing Long Lake together with Orono to scuss the Highway 12 corridor issue. After an initi-1 meeting between the »o City Couticils on September 4, 15*^, communication sd—several postponed meetings and now an absolute i . y t..u Mayor of Long Lake to m»«t with us on this issue. Whc\ a hopeful situa* ion when we met with you tw months ago has bt a frustrating o*ie. ve want you to know that Orono has been and continues to be willing to cooperate with Long Lake in meaningful discussions regarding Highway 12. As you can see from the «.iclosed Resolution adopted by Orono on October 14th, we are prepared to help Mn/DOT mitigate impacts to the City of Long Lake. This is a major commitment on the part of Orono. We feel the City of Lang Lake should also take responsibility for contributing toward a solution. The draft scoping document, which will substantially :re the range of alternative corrld'rs could possibly be coitj «sted by December 15th. Time is running short for the two cities to reach a mutual solution in time to have an impact on Mn/DOT’s decision process. lUXPHONE-473-7357 • FAX -4734S10 Senator Gen Olson Novesiber 15, 1991 Page 2 Gen, you indicated an interest in helping the two cities work together on this very important issue. Would you be willing to help mediate discussion between the cities? Gabriel and I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, n GABRIEL JABBODR and J. DIANN GOETTEW Orono City Council GJ/JDG/ch cc: William Crawford, Metro District Engineer John Riley, Chief of Staff Governor Carlson Ed Cohoon, Acting Commissioner of Transportation Representative Steven Smith Steve Bay, Minnesota Dept, of Transportation ;-'LI H'. !- I r y r CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3031_________ A SBSOLDTIOH IHDICATHI6 ipiwK OF OROHO'S NILLIVOBFSS ummmi and ovarall impact on existing and planned land uses, and WHFBBASr the impacts related to using the existing Bighway 12 corridor can be significantly mitigated; and WHXRBAS v MnDOT is the responsible agency for mitigation of these Impacts i and WSMBBhSt the City of Orono iinderstands that the ability of MnDOT to offoetively nltigate the impacts nay depend on Orono*s cooperatione mem, TBBRBFORBo BB IT RBSOLVBD that the City Council of the City of Orono is willing to cooperate with MnDOT 5? Long Lake to enhance the ability of Ifl^acta of upgrading Highway 12 using the existing corridore Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 14th day of October# 1991. ciVrk Barbara A, Peterson, Mayor Page 1 of 1 y r-'i-L-. i'. 1^- t. !■ ■i - - - A Delano > 1 1 ‘ i i {„ V._ _^ 1 • November 20, 1991 . . . a place to grow ;ilOV 2 2 1991 Mr. Steve Hay, P.E. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Transportation Development District 5 20SS No. Lilac Drive Golden Valley. MN 55422 Dear Steve: Please find enclosed a certified copy of Delano's resolution supporting the in-place corridor for the U.S. Highway 12 up-grade. This resolution was unanimously approved at the City Council meeting of Tuesday, November 19, 1991. This decision was made on Tuesday night after several informational meetings and Public Hearings to receive in-put from citizens in Delano along with Joint Meetings with the City's Planning Commission. It is requested that our decision concerning the in-place corridor be placed in the scoping document that you are currently drafting and will be submitted to all the committees within the next 30- 60 days. We would like to thank the Minnesota Department of Transportation ^ their assistance and aluable service during this process. ♦It has obviously been hectic for you, but the service you and staff are providing are in the best interest for the public now and in the many years to come. Should you have any questions concerning the resolution, please feel free to contact me. S|mce^ly, Mayor t A. Poss, 0AP:lmz cc: Larry Dallam Policy Committee Members Citizen Committee Members Technical Committes Members City Ofrices: P.O. 108, Delano, Minnesota 55328 • (612) 972-3213, Metro 479-1535 T-" f f -► « ir i RESOLUTION R-91-71 RESOLUTION BY THE DELANO CITY COUNCIL ENDORSING T. r. IN PUCE ROUTING ALTERNATIVE OF HIGHWAY 12 IMPLL'IENTATION OF THE WHEREAS, Public Hearings were held on June 10. 1991 and November 13. 1991, to consider the Highway 12 corri-^or alternatives; and WHEREAS, the Delano City Council has reviewed and considered the potential advantages and disadvantages of each Highway 12 corridor alternative; and WHEREAS, the public comraent expressed through the Public Hearings and petition greatly favored the in place Highway 12 corridor; and WHEREAS, based on Council review of the Highway 12 option, the City Council cites the following findings: 1.The in place corridor represents the best alternative for serving the conifflunity socially, economically, and physically. 2.The in place corridor provides strong benefits to the conanunity's coonercial and industrial land uses. 3. The in place corridor represents the alternative that is least dis ruptive to the regional natural environment. 4. lae improvement of the Highway 12 corridor will serve to improve the traffic safety within Delano. 5.The endorsement of the in place Highway 12 corridor will support and encourage continued commercial and industrial investment in Delano during the period of continued highway planning. WHEREAS, the Council recognizes the impacts and benefits of each Highway 12 corridor option. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Delano City Council, upon review .; Highway 12 options, formally endorses the implementation of the place Highway 12 corridor for the City of Delano. DATED THIS 19th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1991. Dwi^t A. Poss, Mayor ATTEST Harlane E Motion By: Second By: Poss: Jaunich: Nagel: Mathisen: Bartels: Bartels Mathisen Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 18» 1991 ROLL The Orono Planning Commission meet on the above date with the following members present: Planning Commission Chair Charlie Kelley and Planning Commission Members Maureen Bellows, Candace Rowlette. Charles Schroeder and Jeff Johnson. Ed Cohen and Sara Moos were absent. The following represented the City Staff: Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Septic Manager Stephen Weckman, and City Recorder Teri Naab. The following Council Members were present: Council Members Jabbour. Goetten and Callahan. Chair Kelley called the meeting to o.'der at 7:00 p. m (#1) #1691 & #1702 CITY OF LONG LAKE, 130 ORONC ORCHARD ROAD NORTH A) AMENDMENT OF COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT PLAN/PRELIMINARY B) COHDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ?j:rA£?f5aJirir and certificate of Mailing was noted. David Squire of McCombs Frank Roos was present to represent the ^i^roa^ iulnifnras r^Ne*c!trCon ‘??!^ S: ^^a ed^nt was there to request Planning Commission action on this matter. Mabusth noted that this property was excluded from the subdivision moratorium. She noted the applicant are proposes a 13 lot PRD development based on existing standards ot the Z acre zoning. The property cons* ><-s of 24.5 acres and 26 acres are needed to satisfy the PRD r, rements. Applicants are seeking a lot area variance of 1.5 acr^ Each pad meets approximately a I acre density. She stated t..at Lot 1. Block 1 wo oot have interior access to the plat road. Mabusth pointed cut the road outlot at the north end would be designated as a separate out lot for possible future expansion to the north. The floocplain has been designed at 947.3' and therefore the lagoon cannoi be used for drainage from the development as it is below elevation. She noted that a retention pond may be needed in the southern portion of the property that may be needed to handle runoff from Lots 3, 4» 5 and 6. A retention pond is shown within Lots 11 and 12. for the northern portion also. Mabusth stated that the applicants propose special setbacks for several of the lots. Lot i; Block 1 would have a 25* setback from the roadway. Lots along Orono Oaks plat would have a 50* rear setback. All lots will meet a 35’ street setback and a 10' side setback. She noted that building pads have been proposed on either side of the forcemain within Lot 1, Block 2, which may be an issue to consider. is considering directing runoff through his property. He noted that he was not prepared to address the issue. ti HINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 16. 1991 #1691 & 1702 - CONT. Mabusth explained that per the Watershed District’s regulations, the rate of runoff cannot be increased across private property. She noted there may be the need to develop the retention pond. Chair Kelley asked if an easement would retention area. taken over that Mabusth indicated that an easement would be taken over the area and the City would also ask for a 10' wide drainage and utility easement along the southern lot line. Palmer asl'ed about the elevation of the property. Squire confirmed that drainage from Lots 8 and 9 would drain towaivl:? Palmer's property, but that runoff would be less than current vunoff. He proposed that no additional grading other than for normal house construction is proposed and hoped they would be able to stay out of the 50' setback area. Chair Kelley asked why the 50’ setback was being proposed. Mabusth indicated that the 50' setback was proposed by applicants in response to the neighbors' concerns within the Orono Oaks plat and an attempt to minimize impact of proposed development. Bellows advised that the drainage and grading plans do not show final grading and she noted there is no indication as to how those final elevations would be accomplished. She asked how a plan as such could be sent to the Watershed District for approval. Mabusth noted that it has been sent to the Watershed and they are awaiting a recommendation from the City. She stated that the plan can be brought back to the Planning Commission after the Watershed has responded and the final plan developed as an information item. Bellows felt that the grading shown indicates a change in elevations and she did not see how that achieved. substantial was to be Greg Kellenburger, 105 Orono Orchard Road, commented that the applicants had rerouted the entrance, which he felt was an improvement, but the proposed entrance brings it closer to the curve and that may be a problem. He felt another alternative would be to route the road to ono Oaks Road for a safer access. He felt that Lot 1, Block Isa questionable buildable lot. He also felt that the road coula be narrower than 30' to allow for maintenance of mature trees. Ardis Poquette, 260 Orono Orchard Road, asked if a survey had been done. Mabusth noted that a survey had been submitted. NiNUTta OP THB ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 16. 1991 #1691 & 1702 - CONT. Chair Kelley asked where the new proposed dividing line between the two cities was to be. Mabusth indicated that the entire parcel would become part of Long Lake and the new boundary would be along the north and west boundaries of the Orono Oaks plat. Chair Kelley asked how that affects maintenance when a road half in Orono and half in Long Lake. Mabusth advised that the road issue would have to be addressed in the covenant and the City would also request tlie restoration of Orono Orchard Drive when utilities are e.xtended from the south. Bellows stated her opposition to the creation of Lot 1. Block I as it appears that a totally separate lot is being created. Mabusth explained that the original plan provided for two lots in that area. She felt this plan had greatly improved and was pleased to see the change. She indicated Lot 1 is a part of the property and therefore must be treated as such. To relocate another residential unit to the east side of the property wou:. have a major impact given the extremes of elevation. Bellows felt that the proposed municipal boundary line may be considered as gerry-mandering. Mabusth noted that municipal boundary lines are often very gerry mandered. Bellows proposed that they are trying to dee’ with the PRD but it is a very sensitive issue and felt that Lot 1 stands out as a monophony. Kellenburger felt that a 20’ front setback for Lot 1 was not large enough. He pointed out that Orono Orchard Road is used greatly by pedestrians and bikers on their way to the Luce Line Trail and asked about a possible pathway. Mabusth stated that the City does have ?. comprehensive trail system plan but a pathway has not been considered for this area. Squire advised Lot 1 would have a 25 foot street '•etback and that th** actual travelled road is 45 feet from the street lot line. Chair Kelley asked about lot coverage restrictions. Mabusth noted that the code allo> s for 15% coverage for areas of less than I acre and that could be incorporated within tlie covenant. Squire reported that a 15% lot coverage was indicated on the plat. -- - - a- a i . >, ^1. ff-0 M,-: ■-' ■ .r y MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 18. 1991 #1691 & 1702 - CONT. Chair Kelley asked if the City of Long Lake understood the ramifications of a limited lot coverage. S<)uire said they understood it to include the principal residence and all outbuildings on the property. Chair Kelley asked how the City would safeguard the.t the zoning restrictions imposed would not change. Mabusth noted that restrictions would be included within the covenant, and the City could specifically note all setbacks for each lot. Chair Kelley asked what aboui changes in Orono’s regulations, would they apply? Mabusth informed him that the property would be subject to the agreed upon convenants and that the property would be located in Long Lake and not subject to future changes in Orono codes. Council member Callahan noted that the regulations for the property will be frozen in time. If changes to the covenants are proposed, they would have to be approved by both cities. Bellows indicated she wanted the Planning Commission to be able to review the covenant prior to fnal approval. Mabufth noted that was not typica procedure but it could be returned for review. Bellows noted that part of their process was to approve the final drainage and grading plan* which have not been supplied and felt the application should be bled until all pertinent information was supplied. Chair Kelley asked that guest house use, rental apartments, home occupations, and duplex use be adaressed in the covenant. Mabusth stated that pertinent standards of the R-IA zoning district could be incorporated within the covenant. Xellenburger noted that it is interesting that the City of Long Lake is endorsing the southern corridor for Highway 12 considering the impact upon this property. Chair Kelley stated that he could not comment on that issue. Council member Goetten felt the issue was not within the Commission's Jurisdiction. Bellows felt it was a valid public opinion. HTNUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OP NOVEMBER lit 1911 #1691 & #1702 - CONT. Johnson asked if the lagoon would be treated as a wetland area with the same setback requirements, and noted the affect upon the lagoon because of the roadwev Squire noted that Ceil Strauss of the approved some filling of the lagoon in gradual slope. DNP. had conceptually order to maintain a Bellows asked if the roadway would meet the 26' setback from the lagoon. Mabusth noted that the road is alreacy .ocated within the 26 toot setback and that further encroachment would require variance approval. She noted that the applican.^ are working with the Army Corp of Engineers and the DNR for approval. and indicated that the road will be reviewed and developed by the City of Long Lake. She indicated that the current loalway is right at the edge of the lagouu. Bellows asked how they could not deal with a major aspect of the development such as the roadway. She asked what would happen if the Watershed did not allow the increase in flow. Mabusth indicated that a new plan would have to be s::bmitted. Johnson recommended refinement of the drainage plan affecting the property to the east. He felt that drainage m-y increase with more vegetation planted and additional hard surface in the area. Bellows asked that the covenant include maintenance veg' \tion within Lh» ' setback area. of natural Squire indicated *.h'« per the comments of residents of Orono Oaks, berms may be constructed between the properties to reduce impact of the development. Schroeder noted he was not comfortable and wanted to know what wou-d be included within the covenant. Rowlette i-nderstood that lot irea variances h*’ never been granted ir a PRD development before and felt it w s a negative precedent. Mabusth felt there were unique findings in this s-:uation. Rowlette indicated the need to protect Orono residents along the property boundaries. Bellows noted that if a berm were to b«^ constructed it would only work on half of the boundary line because of the elevation of the property. Mabusth proposed that a swale may be developed on the second half of the line. She asked if landscaping issues should be addressed in the covenants. f;r. ■t r.’ t I’ I Iff K f-- HINUTBS OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMTiSXON MEETING OF NOVEMBER 18, 1991 #1691 & #1702 - CONT. Chair Kelley stated that tn.usolutely should be addressed. Rowlette asked abouu entrance monuments. Mabusth nc-ed that the covenant may wish to restrict height of monuments. Bellows felt the application should be ta“ Commission’s hands were tied as the applicati on tt. the Council to make the deadline of the meeting. •t felt the ed to move cipal Board It was moved by Johnson, seconded by Schroeder, to recommend approval of Application #1691 and #1702, City of Long Lake for property at 130 Orono Orchard Road North, for a conditional use permit for a planned residential development, an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, a variance to the lot area standards, and a variance to the required 26' wetland setback, subject to appropriate conditions included within the covenant and subject to conditions noted on Page ‘ and 6 of the memo dated November 15, 1991 to the Planning Comfflis,.on from the Zoing Administrator. Ayes 3, nays 2. Chair Kelley and Bellows voted nay. (#2) #1703 EDWIN J. & TRACES GIBB«. VACATION OF UNIMPROVED RIGH’*''0F-WAY, CLARA AVENUE PUBLIC HEARING 8:10 • 8:15 h.H, The Affidavit of Publica:*on and Certificate of Mailing was no Edwin and Tracee Gibbs were present. Ralph and Ruth Knox, 1029 Loma Linda Avenue were present for the application. They stated that they would like to obtain partial ownership of the vacated street. Mabusth stated that the Public Works Director has reviewed the request for future public use and only asked that a 10' wide drainage and utility easement be provided along the present roadway. She indicated that the Knoxes would like to have the City maintain a corridor to allow access to the southern portion of their property. >Caox noted the previous owner of his property had deeded a easement for Clara Avenue and felt it should revert to property ownership. 10’ his Mabusth pointed out tlwit the Loma Linda plat was filed in 1912 and the Knoxes' written comments suggest the granting of 10 feet in 1955. The City has no knowledge of any improvement in the area in 1955. It will be the burden of the property owner to provide title information as to the deeding of land for Clara Avenue. i' I •» ;'v el' ; > f- 1: l^- 11 MINUTES OP THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER tS, ll9i #1703 - CONT. It was noved by Chair Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to recommend Approval for Application #1703 for Edwin J and Tracee Gibbs for a vacation of the unimproved right-of-way of Clara Avenue, maintaining a southern corridor for access to 1029 Loma Linda Avenue. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#3) #1697 JIN RIVERS. 1440 SHORELINE DRIVE - APTER-THE-PACT VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING 8:15-8:27 P.M. The Affidavit of Publicatj'^n and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Jim and Mary Rivers were present for this application. Mabusth explained this application involves the after-the-fact construction of a deck placed over existing sijne patio in 1978. She noted that permits were issued for the construction of the addition and the shed at the same time as the deck was constructed. Rivers noted the stone patio was there directly below the current deck. He didn’t realize the permit had been issued for the addition and shed. He indicated there used to be a concrete boat road to the residence which has been removed. Mabusth noted that all three parcels owned by the applicants were used commercially in the past. Chair Kelley asked the owners why they felt the application was before the Commission at this time. Rivers noted that his neighbor had done extensive remodeling and then wanted a deck which was denied, so the neighbor indicated that the Rivers had been allowed their deck, which triggered the application. Johnson asked if a condition of approval be that intensification or replacement of the deck be allowed. no Mabusth noted that had been done in the past. It was moved by Chair Kelley, seconded by Johnson, to recommend Approval of Application #1697 for Jin Rivers of 1440 Shoreline Drive, for an after-the-fact variance to allow the deck structure to remain, subject to no intensification or replacement of the structure be allowed. Ayes 5, nays 0. iWfarirnitiliA nii^if'ii r n V * MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OP NOVEMBER ISi 1191 1? S'! 4’- :>*■ r" 1. I I I I s ■fe-' (#4) #1698 JIM RIVERS. 1440 SHORELINE DRIVE - APTER-THE-FACT VARIANCES ~ PUBLIC HEARING 8:20-8:32 P-M- The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Jim and Mary Rivers were present for this application. Mabusth noted that a variance was granted in 1976 for an addition to the existing residence which did not include the addition of a deck. Rowlette noted that the plans specifically stated that they do not include approval of a deck. Bellows clarified that the structure is actually a three seascn porch. Rivers reviewed that the deck was added when the addition was built. He stated that Jacobs. the inspector. reviewed the addition and noted the deck but felt that because of the exit through the patio doors, some sort of access would have to be allowed to remain. Rowlette confirmed that patio doors were approved on the plan leading to an approved staircase. Johnson reviewed that the deck was added and then later became a three season porch. givers noted there is a big cottonwood near the deck. He stated that the porch is not heated and is actually portable as the screen panels can be removed. Bellows reiterated that the plans state "no lakeside deck shown". Rowlette concurred and noted that the deck is sitting right on top of the water. Rivers asked if they returned with a plan to reduce hardcover on the property, would the Commission consider allowing the deck to remain? Mabusth reminded the Commission that the applicants are obliged to maintain parking area within the street yards per a previous condition of approval. Chair Kelley stated the applicants should return with a plan and he noted that he would also like to see a plat of the current right-of-way allowances for that area. It was moved by Chair Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to table Application #1698 for Jim Rivers of 1440 Shoreline Drive. to allow applicant time to submit a plan for hardcover reduction on the property. Ayes 5, nays 0. i' N1NUTI8 or THI ORONO PLANNING CONHISSZON MEETING OF NOVEMBER 18. 1991 (#S) #1699 MICHAEL RENARD. lies TONKAVA ROAD - RENEWAL VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 8:38-8:39 P.M, The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of noted. Mailing was Michael Renard was present. Habusth noted this is a second renewal of a variance request. Chair Kelley informed the applicant that the City may have new figurations required for lakeshore lots and that could change the calculations for his proposal and in the future it may not be an automatic approval. It was moved by Chair Kelley, seconded by Johnson, to recommend approval for Application 1699 for Michael Renard of 1185 Tonkawa Road* for a renewal variance to allow construction of an addition to his existing residence. Ayes 5. nays 0. (#6) #1700 DALE MCCURDY. 4041 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING 8:39 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate noted. of Mailing was No one was present for this application. It was moved by Chair Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to table Application #1700 for Dale McCurdy of 4041 North Shore Drive, until such tine that applicant or a representative could be present fcr the meeting. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#7) #1701 PHYLLIS B. SPRAGUE. 3340 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING 8:40-8:45 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Mrs. Sprague and her son and daughter-in-law were present for this application. Mabusth stated that the residential use had ceased sometime in 1985. She noted that legal commercial use was never approved for this property. A variance would need to be granted to the non- conforming use section of the code because residential use had ceased more than 12 months ago and stated that the City Attorney had cautioned such approval. if bK- MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OP NOVEMBER 18, 1991 #1701 - CONT. Chair Kelley clarified that the structure is proposed to be used for storage and combined with the existing residential lot next door. He felt it was a great solution to a terrible situation. He noted that a bath and kitchen would not be allowed in the structure and there should not be habitual residential use of *’he property. It was moved by Chair Kelley, seconded by Schroeder, to recommend approval of Application #1701 for Phyllis Sprague of 3340 North Shore Drive, to allow a residential use of property zoned B-2. Ayes 5. nays 0. (#8) #1704 C. ARNOLD CARLSON/DARLOW MADGE. 8S5/87S FOREST ARMS LANE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE - REQUEST TO RESCHEDULE AT A LATER MEETING (#9) REPORT BY PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE MEETING OF NOVEMBER 12. 1991 TO COUNCIL Johnson attended the meeting of the Council on November 12th. He noted that the Council had trouble dealing with the request by Brinkley on North Shore Drive to allow construction of a garage. Johnson stated that the Council directed the Commission to establish guidelines for entrance monuments. (#10) STATUS REPORT BY LAKE USE COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVE Chair Kelley noted the Committee wciked on a comprehensive plan for marinas. He stated that the first draft of the DNR rmgulations has been completed and Gaffron was currently compiling all comments on the regulations. He noted that it would be submitted to the DNR sometime in January of 1992. He f^lt that the regulations would be for the betterment of all lakes and natural resources in the area. (#11) STATUS REPORT BY FACILITIES COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVE Chair Kelley noted that the City facilities project has been put on hold due to the weather. He stated that the excavator has withdrawn his bid until May of next year. Kelley noted that work is continuing in development of the plans for City hall and the police department. He noted that the City will proceed with the sale of the bonds. Bellows asked if it were true that they were operating with soil borings of the site from 1987. She noted that it should be required to submit more current borings when dealing with development. Johnson felt that now may be the time for corrective work to soil to allow water to be shed off instead of soaked vnto ground. the the I? f- MINUTES OP THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OP NOVEMilR ti, FACILITIES COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVE REPORT - CONT. Council oenuber Jabbour noted that the road must go in first in order to proceed with the project. He pointed out that the next lowest excavation bid is $105,000 higher. Bellows noted that she has not been notified of ficility committee meetings and requested staff to do so in the future. Bellows stated that since the project has been delayed, perhaps a review of Boarman's contract is appropriate so as not to incur unnecessary expense. (#12) OTHER ISSUES Rowlette requested another joint meeting of the Comnission and Council. Planning Chair Kelley stated that he met with Dick Flint of the Park CoMission to discuss the Orono sewer pond site and the park plan of Orono. Flint advised him that he would like to see the developed with three building pads in order to acquire the $150,000 neeaed for the facilities project. Kelley felt that the land should be maintained as a park and that the City should not sell land for development as land may be needed for parks some day in the future and will be even more expensive than currently. He noted that this site is a habitat for much wildlife and also is a part of the French Lake water system. Council member Callahan explained that he was under the impression that the Park Commission was split on opinion of development of this site and some members even felt that the site was unvaluable as a park. Bellows felt it nay be appropriate to invite the Park Commission to a meeting to find out what they are proposing. (#13) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Johnson, seconded by Chair Kelley, to approve the minutes of the October 21, 1991 Planning Commission. Ayes 5. nays 0. (#U) REPRESENTATIVE TO THE COUNCIL MEETING Bellows volunteered to attend the December 9, 1991 Council meeting. ADJOURNMENT . ^Chair Kelley adjourned the regular Planning Commission meeting at 9:00 p.m Charles Kelley, Chair Person / djt'v /w /// 2300 Oliue fluenue Ulayzato, MN. 55391 NOV 2 5 1991 Nouember 21, 1991 To UMiom It May Concern: Proposed Properly Tan r >r 1992 Ulith regard to your letter receiued last uieelc I mould like to complain about my property tan. In 1987 my property tan uias $416.70 and noui you are suggesting that I pay $707.55 for 1992. Last year I paid $61 1.S2 luhich I thought mas too much of an increase, and noip I am being asked to pay approKimately $100 more. I feel that I am paying too much property tau r I Donald E. George 495 Oxford Road Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 WM 2 5 1S91 November 15, 1991 Orono City Council City Hall 1335 South Brown Road Orono, Minnesota I ••k. Dear Charman: I an writing this letter 'o state my position on the current proposal for a sewage systcrt in our area. % First and foremost I want to refute the idea that there has been a letter from me requesting the sewage system to proceed. 'I V Second, I wish to state that the current proposal is b' h unecessary and unsound financially for me and others in our area. My own situation has been handled as needed which your inspections and records should verify. Any problems that do arise I have the necessary property and means to handle the situation and my plan is to do so. I trust this make my position clear. I f anyone whishes to discuss this with me, I will be glad to do so. k Sincerely, h i_ _ _l_fieorae lA iJitNuMnatCompRry &7•••# omtcron ■k.'; (^rono Cjt^ 04^ f4c)J hi 1 M/0 t . . S'S5 x 5 A ■' kim: ■^m mmm vmMa» f/TT r ^■r . ):A:' ' •/. ■lira***m r >no Point i • . : ^ mm • • ■ 1 ../...'' : 33 .• ■ ; - . X'A •f--—■ . ( I \ I •\'\\ ulo"."*'"**®" ^ y V-/' 'village OF. nQHMn . „ . Miii' W?' ' Am : IVCINI A. HICKO k \ a 1; ;H/drologl«i Inglneari ■ MlnnaiiiiaiU ■ 'Minn-'- i '■:S m- ■ i .;4r :v 0^ I nFPART M?N^F'^NATURAL RESOURCE n»io.o wni <;pn n mature cn^JRERVA^ j_p., .CEU..™., aim lift.Sisafif MiMAm '0s:m'mm ^Bl I s MMk^iimm. i^ ,^^SPW■=sgspipB #P 90* ( Itf 19 ‘ row !<*•lO' 1 1 or.2 0% ------r---------- e.uRe> 4 tiuTrtt? k-------1 V 6IT. WtAR ^URt>K - Mm pot IWi TVr* 41 mma , A------2" Bit BA&e iOUBi^ - MM DOT 13S1 TTPt 41 MMA ' tS^o^J -----iRUi»U6 ^UAEiZrt' ROUt 6Ai>t- - APPROVE.C> i&ue><9RAO&^ TVPId-AL ^TgCiKT ^EdTlOKJ MT6i- LB^EMD --------- COMTOUR (^*»00> PR£7PO«>&D 4 |990.0| POreKlTIAL. &l.P<9- PAD W/^AR. EUfiV. ------- PIRBATJOU PP AURPACB PRAJMAMi IW ARB A OR VtuO^lTV. 2. A4^.BPTED C.RO^IOKJ ^OMTROL TEtUWtOUE«> AMAL.I-. e>B. BHPUOVRO DURlM^ i APT&F CONfeTRUOrioW rUMTIL. VS^yBTATlOKJ i€» RBEtn'Ae»Ut>UED»). DCTAIV-. 3 AM XPPROVBD feSDlMBKJT 40MTR01- ^rfr'fcTBM UPED_pURlN4» f APT£.R^M4>TRUOT10M ?K4D ARCA tMTO L.OM<:, UAK.E CRE&<. BCKiOMMAkgyCS APR. E.MTRAMAB axi ZtpO l-IMOBWOOP L.AMB. £gO^IOKJ (^.OMTgQL PE.KJ(LE DETAIL ^*:.ALE I'Al-O" KJOKTW O 90 too 400 RCCT A bJ*A[>0 OME»^ OM W i lOO TE FLOOD E1.SV Revisions >I»401UI ttMlMin IMDtl McCombB Fnnk Root AMoelalBR Inc. zl/ig/ni V02^t> 150S023rdAM N Ptymouth. MN 5S447 612/476-6010 EngtoMfi PUnn»ft Survtyort PR.EUM1KJARV feRAOlWtr 4 DI?A(N/>kfaE PLAM FLEMING, TRAIL ADDITION! OBONO, MINJKJtSOTA PBBPABED POBi C\T'i OP LOMG LAI.it MIMME£>OTA I . /... fe; ■ H-542 Jia (14)(13) UJ § H-U- <IC) UJ CL i M5)l (46) 1 h"? 1 1 (49)(50) _MH-5S MH-552 j SECjOND STR^El Wh i:-: V;.v- < , .V. .V., - ■'V "' V'; ' ‘ ■ 4- .