Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
09-23-1991 Council Packet
:ir 'r ft u Kh r-i-§:h:: ’y-' .1:1^' i'm' h i.|;. fJ' i: 1^ r|; p:;fc: AGENDA FOR COONCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1991, 7:0« P.M. (*)Asterisk items are considered to oe routine items to oe enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon request. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the public Packet whicn may be obj^ined upon request from the Recorder. ROLL CALL 1, CONSENT AGENDA* 2. Park Commission Candidate Interviews APPROVAL OF HINOTES * 3, Regular Meeting of September 9, 1991 ‘’"0*0 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT - JoEllen Hurr Rep. POBLIC COHNENTS « (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) SOMING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT **APPLICANTS** iMediately after the Council has reviewed your application please sign the three (3) original resolutions at the Recorder's desk. Applicants need not execute resolutions for subdivisions, vacations and denials. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. #1573 Carol Kelly/James Massey, 3020 S. 3030 Casco Point Road A. Request for Special Consideration Regarding Park Fee B. Final Subdivision - Resolution #1608 James R. Hartzell, 2987 Casco Point Road - Variance - Resolution #1626 Tim Traff/Eric Wilson, 2683 North Shore Drive - Revised Site Plan- Review for Consistency with Recent Variance Approval #1668 City of Oronc, 700 Old Crystal Bay Road - Final Subdivison - Resolution #1669 John Walker, 1310 Spruce Place - Variance - Resolution #1676 City of Orono, 700 Old Crystal Bay Road North - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution #1677 Cedric Dettloff, 1255 Dickenson Street - Variance - Resolution #1678 Paul and Marcia Merlo, 2142 Shadywood Road - variance - Resolution Moratorium Discussion Re: Lot Line Rearrangements HATOR/COimCIL REPORT nGXniR REPORT 13. Bid Award - Facilities Frontage Road Pt AGBNDA FOE CCOHCIL MBBTIMG SBT FOR MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1991, 7:M P-M CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S RBPORT 14. 1992 Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission Budget 15. * 16. Contract Barr Engineering 17. Request for Proposals For Prosecution Service 18. police Schedule/Temporaty investigator Assignment 19. Police Ser.vice Contract With Long Lake 20* Fire Service Provision Alternatives 21. Eepclution Regarding Bonding For The City Facilities Through ^¥he HRA 22. Financing For The New City Facilties 23. Amendment to Resolution #3009 24. Council Work Session Concerning The Stuobs Bay Sewer Project CITY ATTORMBY'S RBPORT L1CBM8BS (25*) BILLS (26*) ADJOORIIMBBT OPCOMIliG ISSOBS AMD BVBNTS I' 09/23 09/24 09/24 09/24 10/01 10/03 10/10 10/14 10/16 10/17 10/19 10/21 10/22 10/22 10/28 Council Meeting Hwy 12 Technical Committee - 1:00 p.m. Delano City Hall Hwy 12 Citizen Committee - 5:00 p.m. Maple Plain City Hall Facilities Design Committee - 5:00 p.m. Room 107L Education Link Park Commission 7:00 p.m. Lake Use Committee 7:45 a.m. Council Chambers 1992 Budget Workshop 5:00 p r... Council Chambers Council Meeting Hwy 12 Policy Committee - 5:00 p.m. Maple Plain City Hall Lake use Committee 7:45 a.m. Council Chambers Saturday - Fall Clean-Up 8:00-4:30 p.m. Planning Commission - 7:00 p.m. Hwy 12 Technical Committee - 1:00 p.m. Delano City Hall H»#y 12 Citizen Committee - 5:00 p.m. Maple Plain City Hall Council Meeting Planning Commission C Council PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. .-I- k' I’m k. I fi:fe r. ft J: NAME (please print)ADDRESS NAflE OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 3. 4Z h.ix£, . 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. .0. .1. .2. 13. L4. 15. 16. L7. L8. L9. ... j 10. I L ¥. V r. J^'4 _ V !v r" ■'V: ■ ■i.r:; '60 i-;t' I k. ir •.I’ fr-' w:>pv |Mi“ m Irv ~ r •. :-.f t- ■ K"-'- y,^ p'O' p. fS--:. .[^V ,. ' S^ \ Q^ QQ\ 5 / TO: FROM DATS: , oMayor Peterson and City Council : Ron Moorse, City Administrator/^"]/^ September 18, 1991 SUBJECT: Park Commission Candidate Interviews I have attached the letters of application from the three Park Commission candidates, Tim Pattrin, Lil' Tod McMillan and Sherokee Use. The interviews are scheduled for 7:00 p.m on Septemoer 23rd. .1. —A.. k K' a I- f. II I .i'n ». i ff''' August 23. 1991 Orono City Council City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 c' e 2991 Dear Council members, I wish to apply lor a position on the Orono Park Commission. There are a variety of items the commission is about to be concerned with that interests me. As you already know, I currently serve the city as your representative on the Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission. Please contact me by mail or phone for an interview lor this position. areiy. Tim Pattrin K Jt:- [fv i?-‘-•I- Iil I:#l Timothy J. Pattrin 1360 Railroad Avenue P.O. Box 51 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Home: (612) 475-1921 Work: (612) 476-3099 MARITAL STATUS: Mtfrttd to Sandy Pattrin, I have two children Tim (9) and Mitchell (7). I have lived in Orono since 1987 at 1360 Railioad Avenue. EDUCATION: St. Cloud State University Major Mass Communications St. Cloud Apollo Graduated 1975 SKILLS: I have mastered all ot industrial television production. With my seventeen years of working in cable. I have a dear understanding of cable television franchising and what it can do for a community. I also have an good background in advertising, promotion, and public relations. 5 years of ’ON-AIR" radio experience. 1973-1978, with WJON radio in St. Cloud. AWARDS: 1991 Minnesota Community Television Award of the Year NR jCP Educationai Program of the Year Award 1988 NFLCP Educational Program of the Year Award 1987 WORK EXPERIENCE: August 1965 to present VIDEO COORDINATOR Districl 284 Wayzata PubUc Schools RESPONSIBILrnES: WMe end pmdufft a variety of video materials for administration and classroom use, televise all events in DMrlct 284. exckiring some sporting events. Oversees equipment purchases and construction of seven television sludto'S and tvwHvay interactive classrooms. Supports television prediction instruction in all grade levels. Transmit al programming into three dHlererx cabiesystem, reacNng over 120,000 homes, from ouf main fadSty. Since 1965, l have been responsible for the creation of over a thousand programs on our chormeL Negotiate cortrad with sateHtte networks for cany on our channel. FREELANCE PRODUCER RC1POM1IBII mri produced 2S-:30 second television spots during the past five years for the Elartley-Undsay Company, also e ffMen mirajie dealer recruiting video in 1987. Provided AAA World Travel production services kom 1996*1990. Former instructor for Triax Communicatiorw for all access facilities outside the TWnCWes. CT I. '■ fl'-V r;,' V ! w«-^' - 11 :.:-U - 'i - . ■' ’♦:■ '': !., r 4«.siw.«. _ D6cerrt)er 1982* August 1985 EDUCATION DIRECTOR Slorer Cable Conununicationii Northwest RESPONSIBILITIES: Liaison between one hundred schools and the cable company in the Northwest Suburban franchise Headed a five men*er education staff dedicated In producing education video material lor classroom use train students/staff in production; and provided any other serviced requested by educators. Produced locai football sbow that featured Viking/Gopher highlights, inten/iews, player guests, commentary, and predictions. Managed six education cable channels on one of Minnesota’s largest cablesystems. August1980 to December 1982 PROGRAM DIRECTOR Slorer Cable Communications, SI. Cloud. Minnesota 56301 RESPONSIBILITIES: Purchitt eguiptnarS and develop a public access/local origination studio. Oversee production personnel and Mams, produce and televise local programming and local news in the four city area. Served as company ialson between the various city halls, police departments, churches, and schools. Repaired various production equipment. COMMITTEES SERVED: . ^ . , 1991 to present: Ceh** Commissioner-Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission, Representing the City of Qorv) 1969 to present: Metro Sports Cable Programming Committee 1986-1969: Lake Minnetonka Area Education Cooperative 1961-1983: Board of Directors of TrI-County Crime Stoppers 1981-1963: Advertising Chair of St.Cloud Wheels. Wings, and Water Festival. REFERENCES: Gary Nunn DiitrIct 264 Wayzata Public Schools Audkivlaual Offlca 12000 Ridgtmount Avenue Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 Mike Johnson Operatfons Manager Northwest Community Television Corporation 6001 Winnetka Avenue North Brooklyn Park. Minnesota 55428 Jim Jancik Advertising Manager Mammoth 13120-S County Road 6 Plymouth. Minnesota 55447 * i •. J I »L 3 -=^ m 2 7 1991 1275 Lyman Avenue Wayzata, Mn 55391 Orono Council PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MM 55323 Dsar Council Members: my application for a position on the Orono Park Commission* I am a viable candidate for the following four reasons: jjy qanuine inT^erest in the community of Orono: Having chosen to live and having enjoyed this community for the ^hree years, I appreciate the concern ny felJow have shown in working to preserve the v .igue characteristics of Orono. This concern for the community, demonstrated by the hard work and commitment of its many individuals, is something I would like to emulate. Mv background in recreational I have been involved in recreational sports all of my life and continue to do so. I recognize how valuable it is to have the opportunities to be able to participate in sports at any age and therefore how important it is for a community to be able to provide recreational opportunities for its citizens. Mv Intereat in conservation; For the past twenty years I pursued my hobby of ornithology. A direct result of my study of birds has been an appreciation and general interest in our natural environment. Orono is fortunate to have much of its rural habitat intact. The park system should continue to complement this unique characteristic. Through education and exposure to the natural environment, I am hopeful that future generations will be able to understand and appreciate nature's delicate balance in their own community. fHY ability to veioh issues objectively: The challenge of serving one's community is doing the best fcr the greatest amount of people while adequately assessing the outcome of those you cannot successfully accommodate. It is the ability to rationally work out solutions through objective listening of all points of view involved. It is this act of carefully understanding and weighing all the issues that I would strive to achieve. • • I I I U r-' 'S': lib.II- i-- r' igynar lance; 1981-1986 Bdueation; Tntereetg; Lili Tod McMillan 1275 Lyman Avenue Wayzata, MN 55391 612-476-8626 Married and mother of two small children. Born 11 December 1958. Youngstown, Ohio. Moved to Minnesota 1987. Commercial photographer - Toledo, Ohio. Work included portrait, public relations, corporate and industrial assignments. Selected participant in the prestigious Ansel Adams Workshop, Carmel, C’. Solo exhibit at the Youngstown Playhouse. Founding member and secretary of The Toledo Friends of Photography. Brown University - Providence, RI. A.B. degree in Organizational Behavior and Management, June 1981. w u ^ Member of varsity squash team which finished fifth in the country, 1979. Choate - Rosemary Hall - Wallingford, CT. Graduated Cum Laude, May 1977. Awarded Distinction in Photography. Captain of varsity squash and tennis teams Ornithology; Member, Minnesota ornithologists Union and The Bell Museum of Natural History. p.rt. of Europe, Southwestern Asia and Africa, including a four-day climb to the summit of Mt. Kilimanjaro. • • F ft- August 27,1991 Dear Orono Staff and Council, 2 9 1921 I *0^d like to “b”* ' M M k ^ ^ y « w w > - — — — impact Orono for years to come of such a committee. are but a fow of my current areas of interest. I believe the Park Commission needs to continue ite important job fJjjJJpj® .. the Council and community m maintaimng and securingcunng open spaces and para deveiopmem. i ms « oi -------- ^Imdlm^ush for development of Orono with the completion of394. I feel I would bring to the Park Commission: attention to de^l wWe keeping the l^r picture in nLd, stick-to-it-ness and a “cm do attitude w A ** d£nent to plan for the future, and energy to work for the good of the Lunity. Please consider me for this Park Commission opening. »• •) I ii IIi V> I) I I I I « Sincerely, Sherokee Dse 3690 Eileen St Oitmo. MN 55359 476-1303 ■l&iMdlkdkdi ^ ■ >; !♦« 14' I; I , MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - £E° ROLL ^5S)3i 0/^ The Ccunci ’ r.et on the otcvo 02 present: Mayor Sarpara Petarcon Goetten, Edward Callahan, GaPrial following repnesantad tna City staff Jonn Gerhardcon, Suildin-^ i Zcn'ng Assistant Planning i Zoning Adminis Attorney Tom Barrett, City Engineer Teri Naab. Ron Moorse was also pras Sullivan arrived at 7:27. Mayor Pa order at 7:00 p.m. ■i H t r 2 men!yS^/jo ^ I I i 11 owing f ^ ^ • > w • • ■ < w * W w I w ^ • -> r*' Tne ^ ^ ^ 4 9 * ^ ^ • A ^ i f> ry P-it-i* A.dninictrator Jeanne trator Michaal Gaffrcn, Glenn Cock and City Recorder ant. Chief of Police Stephen terser, called the meeting to M H • ] r- in, w • w ^ OATH OF OFFICE Acting City Administrator Gerhardcon administered the of officG to Ron Moorse. City Administrato''. w W w « > (#1) CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Peterson consent agenda. requested that Item be removed from the It was moved by Gcetten, caconded by JaPbeur. to approve the Ck i w « %«• •Consent Agenda, whic.h includas t.ha ro’lowing ’tarns: the minutes of the public nearing on the prcpcsec facllitias he’d on August 29. 1001: Par'. Lana accass reconstruotion issue; Fa’’ Clea-^ up dates; performance review and compensation adjustment for Linda Walters and the Admir.istrator' s information. Agenda Item numbe*' 2 has been eliminated from the concent agenda. Ayes 5, nays 0. Motions for all items adoptao by consent agenda will ce included in the minutes in their respective numerical order. (#2) APPROVAL OF MINUTESButler roquasted the last sentence on Page 1 -5 Item #19, be amended to reflect that Carole wi’l be e Increase to Level 4. Step 2. September 0. 1 igiple for a salary 1002. She also asked why the issue of current and future contracts with Long Lake was not on the agenda as requested by Acting last meeting, and also the issue of a pos prosecutor. It was noted that these Items the Mayor's report and the Cit.. .Attorney's Mayor Callahan at the sible change in City would be covered under report respectively. It was moved by Butler, ceconded by Jabbeur, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Counc'. 1 held on August 26, 1991. Ayes 4, nays 0, abstention l. Mayor Peterson abstained as she was not at that meeting. (#3») APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour minutes of the public hearing held on August 28. nays 0. to approve the 1091. Ayes 5, MINUTES OF THE JUGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - SEPTEMBER 9, 1991 $ r ■ ll: IIr- I ti' kARI minnitonka conservation district JcEllan Kurr. City rsprecontit i .-g . tnat the L-CC has two conmitteeG octiva. ’'he -• ct ccrr'ttGO 'c ^eh^-ge =* fees and they ara a-cpooirg tc -a-ca ‘esc tc jae-c ty apcut S50.000. They are hocinp that t^’C w’l’ ''seo the lmcD asking cities ter anv additicna: ncniec. Alee, tne lata fee wi'l be chanoed to reflect 2 carcahtace c' the *’ee C/<ed 2nd w' 1 gc uc evary nenth. as opaesaP tc one f’at ’ate ^ae. She went on to explain th’ cthar cennittee is an ethics committee, which is werKing on f e issue of interest or conflict of interest by members of the be.rd. She is concerned that members of organizations on the b '^rd can vote on issues that specifically help that organiza w **»•** Jabbour asked if this could pesa a quorum preplan. Hurr noted that there are only thrae ntnbers wnc belong tc 2 specific organ 1zation. Hurr mentioned the next meeting of Drone's Lake Use Committee will be helc on September l2th, and she will not be in attendance. She submitted a redraft of three sections of the LMCD's plan, and explained a fourth sacticn on ^mp1ementation has been redrafted but is not for pub’ic -elease yet. Jabbour asked if these drafts have beer adccted yet. he explained that the Council was unable to attend the LMCD's last meeting, but they were under the impression that language was tc be changed in the plan and a dra^t was tc be sent tc Crone which was not yet received. Callahan explained that there was a draft ►V ( w « consideration on August 21st and the Council was unable to attend at that time because of a conflicting meeting. At that meeting, at the request of Callahan and Jabbour, the LMCD cid make some changes, and there was to be a •'edraft of the whole proposal. Cn August 28th, the LMCD had another moeting and the Council was again unable to attend, but Representative Hurr went and was able to get tne draft changed back to the way it was previously and suggested that the LMCD was out of line to change it in the fi-'Ot place. Callahan explained this was due to lack of communication with Hurr. He noted that there is now another draft of another section which will be submitted on September 12th. He felt it was important to have Council represented at that meeting. Jabbour did not concur that the Metropolitan Council was drafting the plan as a committee of 40 edited the draft word by word. He critized the Metropolitan Council for handing a draft to the Council on a Monday with a scheduled meeting on Wednesday to adopt that draft. ■ ■" rfr-IIlbrI Ks-■ ■tE. ■ [-' ; ■ :,1 r?.: My.. W^‘■t--'fe- •■fe U: I i i •’•.■- «J> - s?- §■ ’V i.ISf'.V MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - SEPTEMBER 9. 1991 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT - CONT. Hurr noted that all 4 cnapta-c wil^ oe oerore the So their meeting on the fourth '.'ednsoOay in Sacteroer. A W * ^ ^ r^ n ^ point the Metropolitan Couno-il is ao ’ng the L‘^CC to -ati^y send on to the citieo for comment. It wac Metropolitan Council that the citieo d'd not have another vote on the Issue. ^ 1 p w ^ 4* ^ m ^ 0 Callahan suggested that Jabbour September 12th and the rest of Crone’s meet at Orono. attend the -neating on Lake Use Committee could Hurr suggested that the Orono Lake use Committee meetings be scheduled for mornings instead which may be better far attendance. She noted that the LMCD is under a time schedule set by the Metropolitan Council. She advised that she had the draft changed at the last meeting because of what is implied in Crone’s Comprehensive Plan. Callahan noted the minutes of the LMCC’s Technical Committee dealt ent1r».'y with discussion about storm water management. He felt that their original purpose was to review the DNP's proposed shoreland regulations. Hurr noted that the regulations encompassed the issue of storm water mar.agem.ent. PUBLIC COMMENTS Ann Cosgrove. 1895 Fox Ridge Road, thanked the Council for the manner In which they handled the meeting with Long Lake on September 3rd. She noted that they did an outstanding Job on representing Orono*s "no new roadbed position" and made a preliminary gesture to assist Long Lake should Highway 12 stay in the existing corridor. She felt they made a very positive impression on Steve hQj as well as other people in attendance. (#4) #1663 MARK JOHNSON, 4465 BAYSIDE ROAD - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #3014 Mark Johnson was present for this acc 1 ication. City Administratcr Mcerse explained that this application involves the subdivision of one lot into two. hq noted that all lots meet the lot area standards. He noted that the issues involved are listed in the Planning Commission's recommendation of approval. Mayor Peterson noted there is a blank date on the resolution for the removal of the shed and pole barn. :r-. I' f I- i: S&-I-R' k- & i' I'k py. rK i^^--I|:-r if MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - SEPTEMBER 9. 1991 IQNINa FILE #1663 - CONT. w * t askad applicant wnat ttia removal of tncce ctrccturac. -> 4:^ ^ ** Johnson said they could Ce ''amoved w w w W* W J w Mabusth notad that would be November 9th. which would be 50 days from the date of preliminary approval. Callahan felt that it should be stated in the resolution that the lot with the barn meets the 2 acre minimum w':tn a principal residence. Mabusth advised that will be stated in the resolution granting final plat approval. It was moved by Butler. seconded by Goetten. to adopt Resolution #3014 approving the preliminary subdivision application for Mark Johnson for property at 4465 Bayside Road, per the Planning Commission recommendation and with the Inclusion of wording In the resolution that states that the shed and pole barn will be removed by November 9, 1991. Ayes 5, nays C. (#5) #1668 CITY OF ORONO 700 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD NORTH - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #3015 Callahan explained that this application is to subdivide a portion of the property which the City is purchasing for the proposed facilities. The purpose of the subdivision is to take the City facility property cut of the overall plot. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to adopt Resolution #3015, granting preliminary subdivision approval to the City of Orono for property located at 700 Old Crystal Bay Road North. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#6) #1671 BRUCE TURNER. 3800 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Bruce Turner and Tim appiIcatlon. Otten were present for this Moorse explained that this is an application for a conditional use permit to continue a non-conforming use of residentia1ly zoned property. He pointed out there are a number of Issues including: the lapse of the non-conforming use, whether the Council can legally grant a change from one non-conforming commercial use to a new non-conforming commercial use, and if the use is compatible with surrounding residential uses. Goetten asked Barrett to comment on ability to extend the use to the applicant. ¥ H'- ¥p<. m ^sp: I'. fe. t-' :'L'- ^:.- i . »MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - SEPTEMBER 9, 1991 ZONING file #1671 - CONT. Barrett ir ncn-conf cr:r. ’ ra use proposec apnrsved use. '.rcrrr.ed thG Ccjnc ’i g.. ..-w- -^wc?. . -w use has seer isar.cJcres ar.s sats^'T.•: r.e wratro- i 2 '- -: rrn ’ f ’ ca-'t V/ d 'i f f ^ ^ pw • • c# ne ^ p r-. ^ '*N • • ^ *•^ • w « w «-• w • ^ Jabfccur clarified that if abardch-r^eet ’S 11 has a residential use. Ccuhcll has a legal obligation to -evert established. the the prope^'ty to Barrett concurred that CiBternilned to be abandoned, variances. if the non-conforming use is the Council cannot grant use Tim Otten, 300 Angel Avenue, v/atertcwn, jr nt owner, noted that the previous owner defaulted on the contract for deed and he and h1s brother purchased the property in May from the origina. contract for deed holder. He noted that is why the property been vacant for so long. Butler advised Otten that the use of the term refers to the approved use and not the land itself, when the previous use ceased. abandonment She asked Turner Info-med the Council that he had found deposit slips In the building dated December 1090 and he noted the letter included with hi- application that stated that the property was used up until mid 9Ci for the sale of vegetables In the parking lot. Gary Kirk, owner of Paul's Produce. explained to Turner that he had granted permission tc use the property until January 1991. Goetten compared the situation tc that on Shoreline Drive as both properties discontinued use because of extenuating circumstances. She felt that the property is not suitable for residential use and would like to see a commercial use continued. Jabbour explained that they needed tc determine the exact date of discontinued use on the property. He 1n*'ormed staff that he would like to see the resolution which approved the most recent conditional use permit application to see If the use Is compatible with what Is being proposel. Mayor Peterson concurred with Jabbour. Butler felt that the property Is not an appropriate spot for residential use and may at some time In the future be appropriate as part of a clover leaf interchange for Highway 12. -he felt that deposit slips did not adequately show that a business existed during that time period and she noted to the applicant that he must validate it in another way. i,MINUTES OF THE REGULAR OROMO COUNCIL MEETING - SEPTEMBER 9, 1991 I- I Si r f' k. lONlNQ FILE #1671 - CONT. Charlie Kelly, Planning Ccmr.’cc”!cn Mencsr. noted that tne property was original’y used ao a partia’ rsoidentia’/conneroia’ Building. He adviced that he voted aga^not the 3=p'ioation ac ‘'e felt the use had ceased. Ed Cohen, Planning Ccnnission Henoer. the use had technically Been abandoned. Mabusth acl'ed for further clar'f'caticn fron Couno^^ to determine if the celling of vegetacles in the parking lot would constitute "uce" under the conditional use permit. Jabbour instructed applicant to produce proof that the property was operating as of July 25. 1990 within the existing parameters of the existing conditional use permit approval. He suggested that the applicant supply cancelled checks for the rental of the property. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to table application #1671 for Bruce Turner for property at 3800 Wayzata Boulevard to allow the applicant time to produce valid documentation of continued use unti’ July 25, 1990 of the property. Ayes 5, nays 0. Turner pointed out the successful businesses in the immediate area. He informed the Council of his desire to upgrade the building for a showroom business. Goetten informed the applicant that they had to deal with legal issues before they could welcome his new business. Callahan added that the Council is limited in their ability as to what they can permit under the previous conditional use permit approval. Barrett stated that Council is free to determine intensity of use, and perhaps should lock at the past use and the "seasonableness" of that use. Mabusth advised that the Planning Commission did not make a recommendation on the use proposed and before Council makes a decision, it would have to be reviewed by the Planning Commission again. Turner asked if the documents would have to be notarized. Goetten said they would Just have to be signed by previous owner. Mabusth asked Turner where another business like his is located. Turner felt that it would be closest to a small scale Grabow-OanieIs. 1 ty I II. i: fe. IP- F 'ii'r i:' ^.' Lf I H. m ■V,-; WMINUTES OF THE REGULAR OROMO COUNCIL MEETING - SEPTEMBER 9, 1991 (#7) #1673 DANIEL J. KLUTH. 2801 FOX STREET VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3016 Daniel Kluth wac present ^ *W V WMoorse sunmarized the apsileant's request as a variance the front yard setback tc build a detached garage in front of the existing residence. He noted that t.he Planning ConTr.issicn votec unanimous approval. Moorse stated that the hardships were that the house is set far back from the street, is at an angle, and tc put the garage further back would destroy vegetation, mainly a black walnut tree. H ^^ wIt was moved by Gcetten, seconded by Butler, to Resolution #2016 granting a variance to Daniel Kluth for property located at 2801 Fox Street to build a detached garage. Ayes nays 0. C f (#•) #1674 THOMAS & ALICE STUCK 4365 NORTH SHORE DRIVE VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3017 Thomas and Alice Stuck were present. Moorse explained this is an application requesting variance to hardcover, side setback and lot coverage ordinances to build a two—story addition and a deck to that addition. He noted that the Planning commission recommended approval of the side setback variance and a conditional approval of the hardcover variance subject to no Increase above the existing percentage of hardcover. Mrs, Stuck noted that they are requesting to build the deck as proposed which would be only 183 s.f. more of hardcover and this would give them a second story deck which would over look the lake. Goetten asked if there was rock around the house. a way to eliminate some H A w • * o Mr. Stuck noted that they have water problems in the basement and that is why the rock is there. He noted that they cannot reduce the driveway sire because of safety reasons. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3017, granting side setback and lot coverage variances and conditional approval of a hardcover variance per the Planning Commission’s recommendation to construct a second story addition and deck for Thomas and Alice Stuck for property located at 4365 North Shore Drive. Ayes 5, nays 0. «• Si 4:k \ :•* f/T-'w 1; V l&‘-fe.tiys MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - SEPTEMBER 9. 1991 (#9) #1675 NINA WZLOMANi SeO SUSSEX CIRCLE AND 3045 SUSSEX ROAD SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT - RESOLUTION #3018 Moorse exDlair.ed thl2 ic a lot Ur.e rearrorgener.t oao'caMy to bring control of a pond in one lot under control of ancthe'* lot. Goettan asked 1f tr.e condmon that a drainage and easement be executed could be added to the resolution. « I ^ ^ 1 i ^ \t Gaffron agreed, noting that staff determined it is appropriate to keep the existing drainage and utility easement, but a new easement following the proposed lot line is also approprlate. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Gcetten, to adopt Resolution #3018. granting subdivision of a lot line rearrangement for Nina wildman for properties located at 560 Sussex Circle and 3045 Sussex Road subject to the resolution being amended to include the condition that a drainage utility easement along the proposed lot line be applicant. Ayes 5, nays 0. executed by (#10) INITIAL REVIEW OF PAhS COMMISSION APPLICATIONS It was moved by Mayor Pete-son. seconded by Jabbour, conduct Interviews of the three Park Commission applicants September 23. 1091 at 7:00 p.m. Ayes 5. nays 0. ^ w MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Mayor Peterson announced that Mel Olson passed away recently. Mr. Olson owned a business at the end of Dunwoody Avenue within Orono for many years. She offered her condolences on behalf of herself and the Council to the family of Mr. Olson. Mayor Peterson also announced that Mrs. John Pillsbury, Sr. passed away on September 9tn. She noted that during the centennial celebration, Mrs. Pillsbury was honored as Orono's most senior resident. She offered condolences to the family on behalf of herself and the Council Members. Mayor Peterson stated that Mayor Swartwood of Long Lake is seeking from member cities who contract fire service from Long Lake a Council Member to serve as liaison with the fire department. Callahan noted that despite what Long Lake wants should run the way it was set up to run, through Administrator. the City the City Mayor Peterson noted that the contract is written to include a liaison. I i'is ^'rr*:VV' yy ‘‘V •* f p*u I r-^I- ?■ I: ■?•: r I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - SEPTEMBER 9. 1991 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. Sutler noted that sre would •'otnor dicouco dapartr.ent altogetr.gr tnan card a . . c- i . ^ . . . ^^ I w ^ 1 ^ ^ ^ • I w S.' • ' « Mayor Psterccn announced tns nazardous wac.e duno c'-e -n Septenoer 13th and 14th. She ac!;ed it the recidentc had teen notif1ed. Hennepin Recycling Comriscicn is responsible for the event. Mayor Peterson asked if Gerhardson had received invitations to attend meetings by the Metropolitan Council and the Hennepin County Conservation District. Callahan remarked that the v/atershed District is going to be dealing more with storm water in t.he future, and we should be more involved with them. Callahan noted the letter received by Hennepin Suburban Parks which indicated they wish to take a more active role in regulating water quality. He noted the letter from Mayer Accromite of Medina and felt the Council should draft a simi.ar response. Gcetten asked when a reception would ta held ^or the twe new staff members. Mayor Petersen explained they intended to wait for a couple of weeks. Callahan noted that t.hey need to seriously lock at the fire service contract with Long Lake. He noted that the present contract results in Orono paying from 80 to 100% of the cost of the service. He surmised that the cost paid could be better used somewhere else. He feU that in the future. Long Lake Fire Department may have problems providing the service. He noted the Irregularities by the controlling agency of the fire department within the contract terms and budget figures supplied to Orono. He felt that orono would be looking more for cooperative activities with surrounding cities. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by .I'ibbour, to instruct the City Administrator to review the current fire service in the community and to report back to Council with findings and recommendations. Ayes 5, nays 0. Butler asked if the discussion about fire protection at the last Council meeting included only service provided to the northorn portion of Orono, ShG expressad that the Long Lake Fire Department has done an exceptional job, anc that all problems are with the administration of that department. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR OROMO COUNCIL MEETING - SEPTEMBER 0, 1991 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. Callafian added that lower ir.surarca -'atac xay ca availadla if the fire ct^t'cn were Iccatcd .r i . e. 3.„ ^ ..ww ow.e..wW provided to Orcr.o reoidentc d * *'f erarty i-i ^ ^ r4 ..ii .IWWWV* w.'w 4 ♦ I I ^ • Sf ^ J should include other oreoc "tn .vh'tch ir,creoseo cerv*'.ce t.^ght be c. some value to Creno. Goetten rcted that the contract is uo Ja:T 1 A • the deadline for changes is Septer.tar 2Cth. nothing would be changed for next year. I ^ » * wa wa • J She - 1992. but • ' m o ^ ^ ^I • t C wa w • < W* «> Jabbour expressed that he has very serious concerns regarding this issue. Callahan noted that not only does Orcnc have a deadline fc- stating concerns, but Long Lake has the same deadline to provide th© proposed budget to Orono, which in the past has not happened. Callahan went on to explain the problems with the police contract. He requested from the City Attorney a dollar amount owed by Long Lake to Orono and has now realized that they owe for both 1989 and 1990. Barrett explained they owe $9,900 for overtime incurred in 1989. He recounted that the remainder of the amounts due involve undisputed amounts which are unpaid. Callahan suggested that the City Administrator write a letter to Long Lake specifying in the form of a bill what is due and explaining those charges. He noted if nothing is done by September 22nd, they take the matter up at that po .t. Goetten noted that a deadline should be specified. Jabbour directed that the letter Indicate response should be directed to the City Administrator. Butler asked if any of the 1991 fees have been paid by Long Lake for police service. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to direct the City Administrator to write a letter to Long Lake specifying in the form of a bill what is due and explaining those charges, and directing them to respond by September 22, 1991. Ayes 5, nays 0. It was moved by Callahan, to inform the City Administrator of the policy of the City Council that he is to deal solely with Long Lake or delegate this authority to staff members discretion. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETI'^'i - SEPTEMBER 9, 1991 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. Sullivan explained na i:: scnedu^aa to acpea- peforQ ‘ne Lcrg Lake Council at tna^r nset^ng on Saptanber ll’tb to axp’a'n services. He askad 'if Council *'a’t this cpp-cp-ate. He — policy issues wnicn nay cone up w'"!! be nefenrad to the Administrator. r ' ^ - Butle* felt that since there i*" a contract tn tcrca. na rust act In a bu .ness-like way and honor his connitnents. (#11) 1992 LAKE MINNETONKA CAiLE eOMMUNlOATIONi eOMMI§§ION §U&§IT Moorse explained this item is the 1992 budget for the Lake Minnetonka Cable commission. He expressed concern about percentage increases in salaries. Butler noted that Spring Park expressed the same concern, Gcetten felt that the City couldn't make changes but they should certainly express their concerns. Moorse felt that the budget is a guide for the Commission and represents a maximum amount. He felt if enough cities voiced opposition, the budget would have to be changed. Mayor Peterson directed Tim Pattrin, Representative to the Commission, to voice the concerns of the City at the next meeting. She directed the City Admin’strator to draft a letter voicing the City's concerns and to copy that letter to other member cities of that Commission, Tim Pattrin and Mary Butler. (#12) WOOOHILL SEWER AGF2EMENT Gerhardson noted the agreement has been changed in a coup.e of areas. On Page 2, Item 7, the M.W.C.C. will no longer be Included in setting the number of units or rates. Likewise in Item 8, they no longer will be involved. Moorse asked how the sewer rate ■'c determ'*ned. ^ O ^ w <9Gerhardson explained it is a flat rate per unit. iie they will be installing meters to check on water usage also. Jabboun asked if we would have the right to adjust rate based on that usage. Gerhardson noted ve would. He noted that a copy of the plan has been submitted to the City Engineer and an easement over the private property has been acquired. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve the agreement with Woodhili Country Club for the construction of a sanitary sewer line from their property and facilities to the existing municipal sanitary sewer line at Russell Avenue and for the ownership and maintenance of the sewer line thereafter. Ayes 5, nays 0. 11 MINUTES OF ’’‘•c REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - SEPTEMBER 0, 1991 '#13*) PARK LANE ACCESS RECONSTRUCTION It was moved by Gcatten. oeconoao oy Jaooour'^ ^ ^ rmaticn and to direct the City Engineer to preoars t r e ♦ ■n ♦ate the repairs c* tho accecc. Ayec 5. nayc C. (#i4*) FALL CLEAN UP DATE It was moved by Goetter., ceccnded cy Jabbcjr. to designate October 19. 1991 as Orono Fail Clean-up Day. Ayes 5. rays 0. (15«) PERFORMANCE REVIEW/COMPENSATION ADJUSTMENT - LINDA WALTERS It was moved by Goett>3n, seconded by Jabbour, to adjust Assistant Finance Director uinda Walters' compensation from Level 6. Step III to ^ovel 6 Step IV ($13,399 per hour) effective September 1. 1991. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#16*) ADMINISTRATOR’S INFORMATION It was moved by Gcetten, seconded by Jabbcur, to accept tne Information on the LaKe Minnetonka Conservation District 9/5/91 agenda and minutes and Technical Review Committee S/22/91. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#17) CITY FACILITIES - HRA ENABLING RESOLUTION Barrett explained he does not have a HP.A Enabling Resolu-icn ready at this time. Callahan clarified that the purpose of the resolution allow the City to charge specific expenses to the HRA. He noted that the closing for tf^e "'’nd is set for September 29th and felt that this money should not be paid out until this resolution is adopted. Me felt that a special session should be held to adopt the resolution prior to that closing date or suggested that the closing date be postponed until after September 23rd. He directed staff net to pay any bills pr^or to adoption. Mabusth asked if t.hey would be allowed to close wi^heu.. final plat resolution. Barrett informed her the sale can be completed conditioned upon finalisation of that plat. Jabbour pointed out that they need to obtain title insurance. 1 - MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - SEPTEMBER 9. 1991 PROSECUTOR'S CONTRACT - CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT CCP*v*^3C^ w^PP3P w j Wi ^ I V • •« . • C PopHan, Hai law f i rr and -'s ’ t ti^at ci'angec *'*'ve oc'-urad wr :cla cculd changa tns pcalticr. cf z^.q Cc-.r:c:!. note tf^at he aric'jnt and runSG*' of ^inec 'z declir.'ing w’'':oh v/ac a source or revenue. He reviewed a nunfcer of alternatives the C’ty had and felt that It would he approor'ata to as!', for PF°s. He noted this could .J0 reviewed st the next -"eetlng to allow Mr. Moorse t.na uO review the issue. ^oorse felt it would be appropriate for both he and Chie^ Sullivan to review the situation. (#18*) LICENSES It was moved by Goetten, following licences: seconded by Jabbour, to a.-)prove the Minnesota North Star Chapter - Gambling Perm-, t Naticna Multiple Sclerosis Society 3380 Shoreline Drivn - Jimmies Lounge Resolution #f3019 Minnetonka Center for the Arts - One Malt Ligucr License 2240 North Shore Crive n »o* •Non-Intcxicating October 12. 1991 - 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. Dave Perkins Contracting Inc, Septic System Installs 15775 Juniper Pidge Or. Anoka Rebers Construction Co. - Special Events Pe-mit Parade of Homes, Sugar v/ccds Subdivision 9/3/91 through 9/22/91; Mcnday-F-1 day 2-9 p.m. Saturday L Sunday 1-6 P.m. Suzanne D. Fackler - Res-'dentlal Kenne ’ L'censa 2700 Togo Road Ayes 5, nays 0. (#19*) BILLS It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, payment of the All funds Account. Ayes 5. nays 0. approve EXECUTIVE SESSION At 9:35 p.m., City Attorney Barrett requested that Council adjoui' to an Executive Session for the purpose of discussing labor negotiations. 13 MINUTES OP THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - SEPTEMBER 9, 1991 ADJOURNMENT It was moved oy Butler, seconded oy Goetten, to adjoun the Regular Council meeting at 10:00 p-m. Ayes 5, nays 0. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: t'/. Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk }«1> • i# mJ ^ «tO -ier^e .wOr 2'>, 1?/1 Lor.^ L..xe, :.;: . - - -♦«//% w' J I % C/^% % % 0 tno Cr*jno Coor.cil: For more tnan twenty years I have been a nenber of the liinnesota Iransportation Museum. This is a large group of people interested in preserving artifacts invol\,-ed in transporting people in the Twin Cities area. This is an all volunteer group. We have already restored a stear. loconotive (now operating in Stillwater). We have three trolley cars ru.nning at tne Laxe Harriet, Lake Calnoun area. How, just last year we have started restoration on a streetcar boat, This boat in the early 190u's took people from tne doors in Lxcelsior to an amusement park on Big Islaal. We have a large building in Excelsior in wnicn tnis is oeing ttone. Many indi-viiuals have contributed in time and money to tnis project. Even tne Minnesota r.istorical Society has givt'n us a largs grant. The plan is to operate tne ooat regulai^ on Laxe Minnetonka, charging people to ride in order to defray expenses of running it. Low we have located a "Twin Cities" streetcar body presently owned by a private party. This person would like to donate tnis to the Museum. We would like to incorporate tne operation of tnis car in conjunction with tne streetcar boat project. The streetcar will take quite a bit of restoration and we must have a place to do this. Tne boat will not oe completed for several years, and until trds is done we cannot move tne steetcar into our building to worx on it. Would it be possible to stcre ,ne streetcar cody on my farm until we can ^ve it into tne shop? I have 55 acres across the highway from tne Orono Senool 3^3t6m» There are several spets on ny farn wnere tnis will not offend the Public's view. The streetcar at tne present time has an exterior protecting it from tne weatner. It Iooks like a small building. Robert Dumas U7>9538 ^ ,-c ^ [J TO:Ron ?1oorse. City Administrator FROM:Jonn R* Gerhardson, Public Works Director DATE:Septemoet 19» 1991 SUBJECT: Appeal Staff Decision - Park Dedication Fee in June of 1990 Carol Kelly, 3020 Casco Point Road received preliininary approval of a suodivision as per Resolution 2816 (attached). That resolution stated that the park dedication fee would be $440.00 as per the old park dedication fee schedule. The applicant was unable to complete the subdivision and therefore had to reapply, thereby allowing the City to apply the park dedication fee as per the new fee schedule. The park dedication fee under the current ordinance requires the assessor to appraise the value of the land and to place an 8% park dedication fee. In this case $7,280 (see attached appraisal). The applicant requested a review of the appraisal from the assessor because the property has not sold and she has been adivised that the price is too high. The assessor has performed another review of the property and has stated that he may have appraised the land too high. I have received an opinion to determine flexibility in the ordinance and have been told that once we establish an amount the only way the amount can be changed is for the applicant to have an official appraisal done by a private firm. The applicant is appealing the staff decision on the following; 1. The applicant wishes to be allowed to fall under the old park dedication fee ($440.00). 2. The applicant wishes that if she is allowed the old fee of $440.00 that the fee be paid at time of building permit issuance. 3. If the Council does not allow the old fee then Council should allow staff to lower the appraised value and that amount to be paid at the time of issuing a building permit. 4. If the Council does not allow staff to lower the value then the amount currently set would not be paid until a building permit is issued. TO: nM)M: Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator /‘-j Forwarded for Council consideration. %• i' % To:John Gerhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building i Zoning Administrator Dates September 17, 1991 Subjects Carol Kelly's Request to Waive Requirements of Park Dedication Fee Ordinance Liet of Badiiblts - A “ Application for #1531 B - Application for #1573 ^ C - Page 6 of Staff Memo Reviewing Preliminary Subdivision for Application #1573 , . , jD - Page 4 of Preliminary Subdivision Resolution Approving Application #1573 would come into effect* Application #1573 was filed July 26, 1991. This application involved the combining of the Kelly and Massey property to create one new riparian lot. Both applicant's realtor. Bill Clark, and surveyor. Bub Smith, were advised that the new application would be subject to the new Park Ordinance Fee. Both the staff memo and -Xic preliminary subdivision resolution advised applicant that the new ordinance was in effect for the most current application. Please let me know if you wish additional information in preparing your memo to Council. Isv !■ i ’’TO-^-^uX^ ^ >/Xc dc/<j^ (Sftc-^cecjC /j^ >yyu^ /J^Ux vt? ^ /P^C , lO-^^ „„^V^ fl>tiXcr<ccJ.-0^4^ ^Xc<XX<^ 'y1 r\ . . iJ^ y..^uL. ^vv- yfet^ U)^-€^ i^C, "ZiA^^ jXt<Xx, 'Zcj^U^^ \Quu ^iSujU 4--« .css*^s4c ^ v 4 ^£-6^ XcXZA.^ruc4, /tiu^v4^ ^ ,>XCLZe^><J¥ti£^ ^4^ y^a^cX X*X^>tL^Xc^C ^{_4.4ry ^ • '^<M. -A<*. c r-v^<4y *7^^’*-<- S'^tX- y2<a-cX V^-41,y 9/,S^.S-€ <14^(U:€ V?c^ <2cl^ 4^VfiJ tjJ^ Irr j: t'--. W tr . K'Ir tr' f.i. r-1 ■r' i. :-.V f. i IN; ^ ■i ; :•: ^lT)fiTiLs/jCiA ^JuxJUjaL/t^ ^ J ^u c5/*>c4-> • ;S^-w si ><C» ^72-4<aJ "TTUuy ^ <2^ a^\uu^ Vi£^ ^ ^ __________________ ___________ ^ ^£ci^ ^vi C/>hvC^ ^ d^hc^ 'Z<^ ^9CYX--<^ V<i-<_, *3o^o {^d^<Lc /^* /n!zL LOO^^mst^, yk^ru 'Sr^9/(Ua ^ AUC c ^ ^ • . - - City of ORONO ' ! T V RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2869 _________ ORONO- 5. The existing structural improvements on Lots 1 and 3 meet the required setback from the newly proposed division lines. 6* Existing hardcover on Lots 1 and 2 shall be maintained at either 25% or less. Lot 2 shall be allowed 4,732 s.£. or 25% hardcover within the 75-250' setback area. tiV ■Oir, THBSBPORB BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the.preliminary„plat application J. Kelly and James Massey for the properties located at 3020/3030 Casco Point Road per the survey originally dated May 21, 1990, Host recently revised September 4, 1990 by Pete J. Knabb of Ron Krueger a Associates Inc., subject to the following conditions: 1. The following improvements must be completed prior to final plat approval: A) Realignment of drainage ditch as shown on survey noted above . t.'- H- F'A'' B) Removal of 398 s.f. of existing hardcover on proposed Lot 1 as shown on the survey noted above (revise date 9/4/90). Prior to final plat approval, applicant's surveyor to submit a revised plan showing existing hardcover removals at 398 s.f., the current plan shows 330 s.f. 2. Upon application for a building permit for new construction on Lot 2, the future owner shall pay the following sewer and water fees: Sewer Unit Charge Water Dnit Charge $1,513.86 1,691.78 It should also be noted that this rate is based on the 1990 Fee Schedule and will be adjusted based on the inflationary rate for each annual fee schedule. 'f- 0 Page 2 of 4 r t 4 ^ F City of ORONO ^ M V RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. :B69 ORONO 3. Current and future owner of Lot 1 is hereby advised that hardcover within the 75—250' setback area is at a maximum *^^®*^*^ level at 25%. Any additional Improvements to this faaulting in increases in hardcover must be approved by the City of Orono and may result in equal or 9>^**ter removal of existing hardcover. I r* I« • • "*'*lp*^ian/dock rights. - The current owner of Lot 3 is hereby advised that present dock location will have to be **^*^®^ next season to meet the required setback from final approved lot lines. The future dock to serve newly created ■riparian Lot 2 shall meet the pertinent LMCD standards that allowed boat density units at the dock based on 73*85' of lineal footage of shoreline. Applicant is further advised that in consideration of the marsh*like to tho potontlal dock sltOp that no atructura or improvements may be placed or installed above the 929.4 without appropriate variance approvals from theCity. vf City Assessor to determine fair market value of 1 acre ®f land in order to assist the Park Commission in detensining Park Pee for newly created lot 2. PINAL PLAT SUBMITTALS 9^’ m The following list of finair-Bubmittals must be submitted to tha Boning Administrator two * weeks prior to the regularly ooheduled Council meeting on the' second and fourth Mondays of the month* The subdivider is hereby advised that a preliminary e^proTel*wi'll expire one year from the date of council's approval of the preliminary plat (September 10r 1991). A. RECORD PLAT drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1*»200'. Drawing to includes *:■ i : { •• • a) Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Peter J. Knabb of Ron Krueger & Associatesr Xnc.# revised date September 4, 1990. b) Dedication of "drainage and utility easements* 10* wide along all perimeter property lines and 5* each side of internal property lines - omit at lakeshore. Page 3 of 4 il'i I- i'. • ^ V City of OROIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _2869 ORONCr c) ®nd dfidlcation of a drainage aasenen^ within Lot 2 and Lot 3 as shown on the plat drawings. Drainage easement to be shown 5' either side of drain age ditch as it approaches the shared lot lines of Lots 2 and 3 can be incorporated within drainage and utility easements and should be designated no less than 10' as it extends lakeward through the remaining portion of Lot 2. Designation, and dedication of right-of-way of .Casco Point Road. e) Name plat. B. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required: a) Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners^ mortgage holders or others with property ir.terest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. ^ * b) The applicant must provide certified copies' of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. C. FEES TO BE PAID: Total Due $300.00* a) Final plat fee - $150.00 b) Legal review and filing fees of $150.00 *c) Park fee to be determined by the City Assessor at a later datsr to be paid prior to final plat approval. Adopt^ by the City Council of the City of Orono* Nimiesota at a regular meeting held this 10th day of Septead>err 1990. JamesXR. Grabek, Ma'yur’ allin« City Clerk Page 4 of 4 u : ? I ^ ( I T V ORONCT City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.2369 A RESOLOnOR 6RA11TI1I6 PRZLZMI11ART APPROVAL OP A PLAT AT 3020/3030 CASCO POINT ROAD PILE NO. 1573 WSKEKSg Carol J. Rally and Jamas Massey on July 26, 1990 filad a formal subdivision application with tha City for approval of a 3-lot residential plat of property legally described as follows: Tract T and Tract^Ur^RegfsTeredT^'nd Survey #461, Piles of tha Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, (hereinafter "the property") and; WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statues 462.358 et. seq, and the City of Orono Zoning and Platting Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 20, 1990 at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and ^ • NHBRSAS, at their regular meeting held on Septeinber 10, 1990 the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of Carol J. Kelly and James Massey (hereinafter "the ■ubdividers”), noting the followin' findings of fact: 1. The property is located within the LR-IC Single Paraily Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 1/2 acre of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created let. 2. The property contains a total of approximately 1.87 acres. Portions of the property are intersected by a public drainagetray, yet "all lota are able to be platted such that each lot maintains 1/2 acre dry contiguous building envelope . 3. Bach lot meets the required lot width to the rear front yard setback line and at the 75* lakeshore setback line measured from the 929.4 elevation. 4. Lota 1 and 3 can continue to be residentially developed without the need for variances to the LR-IC zoning standards. Lot 2, the undeveloped lot, can be residentially developed without the need for variances to the LR-lC standards . Page 1 of 4 I City of OROIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. __ OfUJNCj A RBSOLOTIOH GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OP A PLAT AT 3020 CASCO POTNT ROAD FILE NO. 15?' NHBRBAS, Carol J. Kelly .^il formal aubdivision application vith as Tract T, lo”r..ia.ntial pl.t Re/ist-ar c£ ^rty", an., .ccora.nc:i?tf S^nn^^^^!a ^s"t*a/u“et33) cl™i.Vion'h.^^d"’a pJbl on°HaV'21. all parson, desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and NHBREASr at their regular meeting held on June ;S: ?.ro“ l^e^TvIiererni^/te'? t\^: following findings of fact: 1. The property is located within the LR-IC Single Family Lake.hore Residential Zoning District Tac^Twly 1/2 acre of contiguous dry buildabie land w^th... each newiy created lot* 2. The property contains a total of acres, all of which is considered a. y buildabie land. 3. The proposed p.'' .t contains 2 lots meeting the required 1/2 acre dry contiguous lot area requirement. 4. Each lot m^ets the required lot width to the rear of the front yard setback line at 30': Lot 1 - tha only legally reco^ised ripatiw the required lot width of 100' at the 5 lakesnor. setback line. S. Each lot can be residentially developed without the need for variances to the LR-IC standards. 6. The exieting structural improvements on Lot i required setback'from the newly proposed division Line. i'age 1 of 4 i.. .1. 'F- t'..- t Mil Citv of OROIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.^ t . :m- ir4i] NOW, THBRBPORB BE IT f®o ‘^f of Orono h^«r«by approves the Point Road per the surveytSrorooerty at 3^020 CascV pVint Road per the survey origfnafly dated 5/21/90, ii'evised 6/V90 byj>ete _J.^ Kna^^ S^2g:?“ to the following conditions: 1, The following improvements must be completed prior to final plat approval: a) Realignment of drainage ditch as shown on survey noted above. b) Removal of 923 scuare feet of existing hardcover on proposed Lot 1 as shown on the survey noted above (revised date 6/4/90). 2. Upon application for a building permit for construction on Lot 2, the future owner shall pay following sower and water fees; new the Sewer unit charge Water unit charge $1,513.86 1,691.78 It should also be noted that chis rate is based on the 1990 fee schedule and will be adjusted based on the inflationary rate for each annual fee schedule. 3. The suboivider shall e.xecute a be drafted by the City to be filed against the chain of titles of Lots 1 and 2 denying all riparian access anj use of the lake via Lot 1 by Lot 2 of this subdivision. greater removal of existing hardcover. Page 2 of 4 riSifib J I u t.' t . >■ 'J Iv !' J i V ' *S % »;•, ■. ► ’s I 'i •; ■.V ’r-. ■■■(■ i!'v ft. '‘j •', » iNa 1 Citv of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL '‘51kNO. FINAL PLAT SUBMITTALS The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks Prior to scheduled Council meeting on the second and . . iKAn^h Th« subdivider is hereby advised that preliminary lill on. yi« fro. the d.te of Council', approval of the preliminary plat (June lx, 1991). A. RECORD PLAT drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1"»200'. Drawing to include. a) Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Peter J. Knabb of Ron Krueger & Associates, Inc. revised date 6/4/90. b) Dedication cf. "drainage and utility wide along all perimeter property lines and 5 each side of internal property lines. c) Designation and dedication of a drainage easement within Lot 2 as shown on the plat drawings. Drainage easement to be shown 5' either side of drainage ditch. d) Designation and dedication of right-of-way of Casco Point Road. Be e) Name plat. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required: a) Title opinion addressed to the C.^'/• All owners, mortgage holders or others with picr».*ty interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. b) The subdivider must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. c) Signid and executed restrictive covenant prohibiting tip.pian u,« of laic, by tot 2 via tot 1. City to provide restrictive covenant for execution oy subdivider. Page 3 of 4 r City of OROIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.2315 FEES TO BE PAID; Total Due $740.00 a) Park dedication fee per current schedule: Lot 2 9 $440.00 b) Final plat fee » $150.00 c) Legal review and filing fees of $150.00 hv the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 11th of June, 1990. iUUi james\R. Grabek, Waryor ' Hallan/ City cl<t3c STATE OFTIINNESOTA ) } ss. COOMTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrximent was acknowledged before me on of the City. Notary Puhiic Page 4 of 4 '«<K' r V y' y y I Pi y %■ ' '■ ' 'i i. •f’. ■r ^i’ p '■''■■ • 1 (■■ ’. tr*. • •> ^.L' '\ [,.■» l; I ■>'•*• ■ t; /i.. • i ' 4 b‘,’ i i, I- I %:sS' ‘t,». PV,' L i ()fi ’OIM(.) CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66 •Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55323• Muniapal Office* On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka TO; Orono Zoning Department FROM: Rolf Erickson, City Assessor DATE; /O- 2*? _______ RE: Park dedication fee of: 7ht/lO Lor rAi<t/u pncm I 1-13 -.^4- co:; «-;_______ 3io-n“)-2.^ - ~ aoo I sri e 9< c o o 9/ C'CO . Oo OO ^ MflUMMS4 ZONING - 47J-73S7 administration a finance - 473-7 33«PUBLIC WORKS - 473-735» tfei* f s;; h L- I Psj • %■ r- i'i: F- I:I Tot Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Membe»B?>^4^i Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse# City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusthr Building & Zoning Administrator »/ Dote I Sobjoctt September 19» 1991 #1573 Carol J. Kelly and James Massey^ 3020 and 3030 Casco Point Road - Final Subdivision - Resolution List of Kxhibits - A - Resolution #2869 Granting Preliminary Plat Approval B - Final Plat of Kelly 2nd Addition C ** Planning Commission Minutes 8/20/90 D - Preliminary Grading Plan As of this writing staff is not <ble to confirm the required removal of hardcover at 398 s.f. on Lot nor the realignment of the drainage ditch as shown on preliminary grading plan. Exhibit B. Ms. Kelly has advised that her surveyor has staked the area of hardcover to be removed and the section of the drainage ditch to be realigned. It is staff's understanding that these will be completed prior to your Monday meeting. Staff will confirm. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted based on those improvements being ccxnpleted by applicant as a condition of final plat approval. The issue of Park Dedication Fee and time of payment has not been included until Council first acts on Ms. Kelly's special request. Staff has enclosed other exhibits involved with the review of #1573 that refers to the application of the Park Dedication Pee Ordinance for this current application (Page 3 of Exhibit A and Page 3 of Exhibit C). If Council agrees that the Park Dedication Fee may be paid at the time of the issuance of the building permit. Condition 4 may be amended to include payment of a Park Dedication Fee along with the sewer and water unit charges. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted for Council's review, amendment and final action. Isv 1^: fe- ■j7' r'”.7?^ A RB80LUTI0N APPROVING THE PLAT OP KELLY 2ND ADDITION APPLICATION NO. 1573 NBBRBASr the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHBRBASf the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and saf^ 3evelopment of land within the City; and NBBEBAS, the City Council has considered the application for a Cl*.ss III sybdlvislon of a 3 lot plat by Carol J. Kelly and James Massey, (hereinafter "the subdividers”); WHBRBASf the subdivision has been found to meet all standards of the LR*1C lakeshore residential zoning district finding that each lot is of a else and configuration that will allow the continued use of Lots 1 and 3 for single family residential use without the need of any variances and Lot 2 to be fully developed without the need of any variances; and NBBRBASr the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: 1. Completion of all the requirements of Resolution No. 2869. 2. Dedication on the plat of drainage and utility easements. 3. Subdividers have completed the realignment of the drainage ditch along the shared lot lines of Lots 2 and 3. Drainage easements have been granted over the realigned drainage ditch on the plat. 4. Applicant has completed the removal of 398 s.f. of existing hardcover on Lot 1. 5. Payment to the City of a Park Dedic .cion Fee in the amount of €.Payment to the City for the legal review and filing of the plat in the amount of $150.00. i I' BONr TBBRBPORBr BB IT RBSOLVBD, that the City Council of the City of Ormo hereby approves the plat of Kelly 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota# subject to the following conditions: Page 1 of 3 •*. ii- ! tr 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Current and future owner of Lot 1 is hereby advised that hardcover within the 75-250' setback area is at a maximum allowed level at 25% or 4,355 s.f*. Any additional improvements to this property resulting in increases in hardcover must be approved by the City of Orono and may result in equal or greater removal of existing hardcover. Current oimer of Lot 3 is advised that present dock location will have to be altered next season to meet the required setback from final approved lot lines. Future dock to serve newly created riparian Lot 2 shall meet the pertinent LMCD standards that *ietermine the allowed boat density units at the dock based on 75-‘i5* of lineal footage of shoreline. Owner is further advised that in consideration of the marsh-like lands adjacent to the potential dock site thac no structure or improvments may be placed or Installed above the 929.4 elevation without appropriate variance approvals from the City. Upon application for a building permit for new construction on Lot 2, the future owner shall pay the following: A.Sewer Unit Charge - $1,513.86 (based on 1990 rate to be amended to meet current Fee Schedule at time of application for permit) D.Water Unit Charge - $1,691.78 (based on 1990 rate to be amended to meet current Fee Schedule at time of application for permit) The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with either the Hennepin County Recorder's Office or the Registrar of Title's Office on or before M-.rch 23, 1992 together with a certified original copy of this Resolution. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this 23rd day of September, 1991. ATTBSTt Dorothy M. Rallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Page 2 of 3 F STATE OP MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ss. ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 23rd day of September, 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor t City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. I;. i"'f t I- ?• r' K’ I- I ^Vj- V*I- • I: Notary Public Page 3 of 3 u p Is i*>S' iIk. City of OROINO U I V RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ______________ ORONO A RBSCLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF A PLAT AT 3020/3030 CASCO POINT ROAD FILE NO. 1573 WHEREAS, Carol J. Kelly and Janes Massey on July 26, 1990 filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a 3-lot residential plat of property legally described as follows: Tract T and Tract U, Registered Land Survey #461, Files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, (hereinafter "the property") and; WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statues 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and Platting Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 20, 1990 at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to spea)c thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on SepternWr 10, 1990 the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of Carol J. Kelly and Jaunes Massey (hereinafter "the subdividers"), noting the following findings of fact: 1. The property is located within the LR-IC Single Family Lalceshore Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 1/2 acre of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. 2. The property contains a total of approximately 1.87 acres. Portions of the property are intersected by a public drainageway, yet all lots are able to be platted such that each lot maintains 1/2 acre dry contiguous building envelope . 3. Each lot meets the required lot width to the rear of the front yard setback line and at the 75' lakeshore setback line measured from the 929.4 elevation. 4. Lots 1 and 3 can continue to be residential 1 y developed without the need for variances to the LR-IC zoning standards. Lot 2, the undeveloped lot, can be residentially developed without the need for variances to the LR-IC standards. Page 1 of 4 /f City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _________ OHUNO 5. The existing structural improvements on Lots 1 and 3 meet the required setback from the newly proposed division lines. 6, Existing hardcover on Lots 1 and 2 shall be maintained at either 25% or less. Lot 2 shall be allowed 4,732 s.f. or 25% hardcover within the 75-250' setoack area. NOW, TBBREPORB BB IT RBSOLVBD, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat application of Carol J. Kelly and James Massey for the properties located at 3020/3030 Casco Point Road per the survey originally dated May 21, 1990, most recently revised Septeraber 4, 1990 by Pete J. Knabb of Ron Krueger & Associates Inc., subject to the following conditions: 1. The following improvements must be completed prior to final plat approval: A) Realignment of drainage ditch as shown on survey noted above. B) Removal of 398 s.f. of existing hardc.over on proposed Lot 1 as shown on the survey noted above (revise date 9/4/90). Prior to final plat approval, applicant's surveyor to submit a revised plan showing existing hardcover removals at 398 s.f., the current plan shows 330 s.f. r * 2. Upon application for a building permit for new construction on Lot 2, the future owner shall pay the following sewer and water fees: Sewer Unit Charge Water Unit Charge $1,513.86 1,691.78 It should a so be noted that this rate is based on the 1990 Fee Schedule and will be adjusted based on the inflationary rate for each annual fee schedule. V:Page 2 of 4 ] 1 I I V ORONa City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.Q N-.1' ;■ k I i-"- 3* Current and future owner of Lot 1 is hereby advised that hardcover within the 75~250* setback area is at a maximum allowed level at 25%. Any additional improvements to this property resulting in increases in hardcover must be approved by the City of Orono and may result in equal or greater removal of existing hardcover . 4. Riparian/d -ck rights. The current owner of Lot 3 is hereby advised that present dock location will have to be altered next season to meet the required setback from final approved lot lines. The future dock to serve newly created riparian Lot 2 shall meet the pertinent LMCD standards that determine the allowed boat density units at the dock based on 75-85' of lineal footage of shoreline. Applicant is further advised that in consideration of the marsh-like lands adjacent to the potential dock site» that no structure or improvements may be placed or installed above the 929.4 elevation without appropriate variance approvals from the City. 5. City Assessor to determine fair market value of 1 acre of land in order to assist the Park Commission in determining Park Fee for newly created lot 2. FINAL PLAT SUBMITTALS The following list of finair‘Submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month. The subdiviaer is hereby advised that a preliminary approval will expire one year from the date of Council's approval of the preliminary plat (September 10, 1991). A. RECORD PIJ^T drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1"=200'. Drawing to Include: a) Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Peter J. Knabb of Ron Krueger s Associates, Inc., revised date September 4, 1990. b) Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' wide along all perimeter property lines and 5' each side of internal property lines - omit at lakeshore. Page 3 of 4 [I ( I r y OF^ONO City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _________ c) Designation an* ledication of a drainage easement within Lot 2 and Lot 3 as shown on the plat drawings. Drainage easement to be shown 5' either side of drain age ditch as it approaches the shared lot lines of Lots 2 and 3 can be incorporated within drainage and utility easements and should be designated no less than 10' as it extends lakeward through the remaining portion of Lot 2. d) Designation and dedication of right-of-way of Casco Point Road. e) Name plat. B. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required: a) Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners# mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. b) The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. C. FEES TO BE PAID; Total Due $300.0?* a) Final plat fee * $150.00 b) Legal review and filing fees of $150.00 *c) Park fee to be determ-t'ned by the City Assessor at a later date# to be paid prior to final plat approval. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 10th day of September# 1990. ATTI6T: James^. Grabek# Mayo! otHy JU’-Ttllin# City Clerk Page 4 of 4 ft ISYlWiI r*«*v^K* # 'r I I '[ L -•• f- ’liV 1 1 i;-G. h ■f. u'' \u Ic? ;rt;‘ ■ t: r MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSICil .^EExING held august 20, 1990 ATTENDANCE 7:00 P.M. -. . .The Orono Planning ConL’nission r.ec on ^..e a^^.e -a..,. ,... following members oresent: Planning Ccmmission^ vice C..air Maureen Bellows, and Planning Commission Memcers .eirrey .ohnson, Jim Hanson, Candace Rowlette and Sara Moos. Tne ro^iow.n^ represented the Citv staff: Builaing and Zoning Aaminisura Mdbusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Acministracer Gatrron. ana City Recorder Scheffler. Council Representative Peterson was also present. #1573 CAROL KELLY/JAMES MASSEY 3020/3030 CASCO POINT ROAD PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PUBLIC HEARING 7:00 P.M. TO 7:15 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate oc .-lai-ing we.e duly noted. Ms. Kelly, Mr. Bill Clark. Realtor, and .Mr. Bob Smitn, Surveyor, were present. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that Planning Commis.sion had previously reviewed an application this property, said, “The same issues exist in this application, except that the subdivision involves a riparian lot and an average lakes.ore setback line must now be considered. The drainageway will now^ e realigned along the shared lot line. The City is asking tnat tne drainage ditch within tne 0-75* setoack area re.main as is, ratne. than being adjusted. Major excavation wou.a we recui.ed^ wO relocat’*: the drainageway and we would prefer tnat not ocwur. City Staff is asking the applicant to confirm that everything o the^ west of the drainageway is a dry, contiguous builcing envelope. The applicant has maintained 100' wictn at t.he .5 setback line and to the rear of the front yard setback line. Bellows asked what criteria is used by the LMCO for doc.t approval. Mabusth replied. "The LMCD uses lineal footage per slip. Lot 2 will have approximately 75 to 35 lineal feet Based on LMCD standards, : boat slip would orobably b allowed.“ Bellows said, "The shoreline area for Lot 2 appears more like a marsh. I am concerned about creating and selling that iot as a lakeshore lot. The property owner may request an extended walkway to access the dock." Mabusth replied. "During the dry spell, there was very little riparian use of properties on Casco Cove. There was a major dredging project approved for Casco Cove." - 1 - r' th :v- C: i 'r‘.- I P *t: ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 20, 1990 ZONING FILE U573-KELLY/MASSEY CONTINUED Ms. Kelly added, ■’T^a5 year ^ tr.e^ res^-en .•.e._ a^.- -- pu their docks in, last year we coo*.. that sc.tethint beBellows suggested title stating that it nay not be filed in wns variances to utilize tne riparian possiblti zo accdin th6 prop6r rights of Lo!i 2. She said, •£SS‘'£;l;riv havrthe^right^Vo do^ wL^ev^r ^s necessary^ to Can the Planning Commission recommend to council, should ^hey Approve this subdivision, that they incorporate such a notice in a resolution?" nabusth advised that such a recotraencatior. •■.ouid be appropriate Ms. Kelly asked whether such a notice v/ould afreet her property and her ability to put in he_ -ock. Bellows replied, "This would only apply to Lot 2 and wouxo not limit your use of your property. The notice does not mean that a variance could not be granted, it is merely a warning tha a variance is required." Mabusth noted that Lot 3 will have to meet the new setbacks from the newly defined lot line \^°?4n*It was observed that the current cioc.^ on the Ho..nan prope. w. appear close to the new lot lane. Johnson asked, "Staff is recommending that the lot line be rearranged to provide adequate dry, contiguous .ana.' Mabusth replied, "T.hat is correct. the lot lines are adjusted as long as the ^ lOO wi-th ^.s maintained at the rear of the front yarn setoacK line ana ..he /5 setback line for all lots.” There were no comments from the public regarding this application and the Public '• 'aring was closed. It was moved by Johnson, seconded by Moos, to recommend approval of application 11573, for a Accordance with staff recommendations 1 to 5, and t.hat an to future ownere of Lot 2 is included in the resolution regarding tSe n«” for a V °/i. °ce for any structure that would be used to the doc* Mr. smith asked whether the Planning Commission SU the^^pli^ant’s proposal for lot »*'Mabust; s^itri iSSt condition »3 would be excluded motion to .nclude staff rec-ommendations 1, 2, 4, and 5. Mo s - 2 - r..V ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 20, 1990 I be subject, to the new parK aecicaw^^.. -_es. ..ot-- JNays-C. Motion carried. #1571 JOANN GRIMES/JAMES HOFFMAN 4720 NORTH ARM DRIVE WEST _ _ VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS POBLIC HEARING 7:35 P.M. TO 7:37 P.M. .c « i The Affidavit of Publication and Certi..icat9 of i.ailirsg we-e duly noted. Ms. Grimes was present. Saffron stated that the vacation of drainage and utility easements is necessary due to the recently approved lot -me rearrangement. Hanson asked, ’’Is the City still unaware of any existing utilities within the existing easement?" Gaffron replied, "That is correct. It was moved bv Hanson, seconded by Moos, to recommend approval of application #1571, vacation of drainage ana utility easements at 4720/4730 North Arm Drive West. .Motion, Ayes-o, Nays-0. Motion carried. #1493 CHUCK DOWNEY 2665 CASCO POINT ROAD VARIANCES REFERRAL PROM COUNCIL AND #1570 CHUCK DOWNEY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 7:38 P.M. TO 7:57 P.M. Mr. Downey was present. Mabusth provided a review of this application, and the action previously taken by the Planning Commission Council (see Jeanne Mabusth's memo dated August 15, 1990). She said, "The applicant is asking for your special consideration to allow him to^ have 48% hardcover, rather than 45% as previously approved." She asked Mr. Downey to provide staff with a sketch showing the area of hardcover that he intends to remove. Bellows noted that the after-the-fact deck must also be addressed. Mabusth said, "Staff was asked to determine where the average lakeshore setback line. we have no record of a building permit for the deck in 1982. Mr. Downey assumed that his t - 3 - V, if. : *. :{■ 'V'i' MiA1^' To:Mayor Peterson and Orcr.c City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator % Fron: Date: Subjact: Michael F. Gaffrcn, Asst Planning & Coning Ad.T.inisii^f^^ September 1991 #1608 Janes Kartzell, 2987 Casco Point Read - Variance - Resolution Soolng District: LR-IC» 1/2 acre, sewered Application: Request for average setback and hardcover variances to construct a pool. List of ftchibits A - Resolution B - Notice of Planning Commission Action 9/16/91 C - Memo 6 Exhibits of 9/9/91 and 8/8/91 Discussion Please review the memos and exhibits of September 9 and August 8* Briefly, the applicant requests variances to allow a hardcover increase from 23.4% to 27.8% in the 75-250* zone. Applicant initially proposed 35.9%, but Planning Commission tabled the request, advising applicant to revise his proposal to minimize the hardcover increase. Applicant al~o requests a 25* encroachment past the average setback line with his pool. Applicant also modified the proposed fencing so that only the pool and its patio, but not the grassy areas above the retaining walls, will be considered in lot coverage, thereby eliminating the need for a lot coverage variance. Planning Coamission Re ndation At their September meeting. Planning Commission voted 4 to 1 to approve the revised proposal for a 25* average setback- encroachment and 27.8% hardcover in the 75-250* zone. Planning Commission noted that the applicant had m->de a good faith effort to minimize hardcover by eliminating portions of existing gravel driveway, removing rock and plastic along the side of the house, and reducing the square footage of timber walls, walkways, and patio. The Planning Commission also felt that the average setback encroachment is not critical due to the topography and existing screening, as well as the physical distance between the neighboring residences and the pool. Planning Commission felt that no adjacent properties would be affected negatively by this pool. The minority Planning Commission opinion was that adequate justification was not shown to support a hardcover increase above the 25% limit. Staff Seco datioa Staff recommends approval per the Planning Commission recommendation. A resolution for approval is attached for Council consideration. Isv A RB80L0TI0N GRANTING VARIANCES TO MIIHICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS I AND 2 PILE #1608 NHEREAS, Jeunes Hartzell (hereinafter "the applicant") ia the owner of the property located at 2987 Casco Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 2, Bloclc 1/ Hartzell Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2 to permit the construction of a pool and associated patios and retaining walls, such construction encroaching 25* past the average lakeshore setback line where no encroachment is normally allowed and such construction increasing hardcover on the property to a level in excess of the 25% hardcover normally allowed in the 75''250* zone. HOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS This ipplication was reviewed as Zoning Pile #1608. 2.The property is located in the LR-lC Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on August 19 and September 16, 1991, and on a vote of 4 to 1 recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings: No portion of the proposed pool, retaining walls, or associated fencing will extend more than 6 ’ above grade, hence due to the topography and the distance of the proposed pool from neighboring residences, the proposed average lakeshore setback encroachment will ..ave no negative impact on neighboring properties. Page 1 of 6 B) The applicant has made a good faith effort to minlniize hardcover on the property by agreeing to ronove portions of the existing driveway, areas of plas'tic-^lined landscape beds, and has reduced the amount of hard surface from his Initial proposal to minimize hardcover associated with the patio and retaining walls surrounding the pool. The increase in 75-250' hardcover is from an existing level of 23.4% to a revised proposal of 27.0% 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports b> City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the after-the-fact variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighbouring pronert would not merely serve as a convenience to the t11 mt, but is necessary to alleviate a demonst. le '.ardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a sibstantlal property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. COHCLUSIOHS, ORDBR MID OOHDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2 to permit the construction of a pool and associated patios and retaining walls, such construction encroaching 25* past the average lakeshore setback line where no encroachment Is normally allowed, and ■^uch construction constituting hardcover in the 75-250* zone in excess of the 25% hardcover normally allowed, subject to the following conditions: Page 2 of 6 r r ' '■r r' I € •v:. •u u)«v o Hi - -':* :vz £.vir7/-‘6 Stt^ ,y/r Co#uc#4frv 1)6 CK ^Ci: f R>*srtC %»^'*- * 1*’ * r- - •- * a irL^ *- (.20 \S V5 s<21 ^: V3-^, 5«j »2« */•/- 4^r«Dv«> ^'' * i/ [>*c«: piX**- C>-»- / •’^® /5C u^C i. o. s4 vt •it /: S'O :. * 5/-"/A *. C • , //§.j^3 • 27 a f^v;.i':' ■t ':i^ *• •• r.r i S'^fA. -rar*W" J * a ! I IS-Z'SD- /iCtAS of _ '■“ '-L-'TjW etv/sefc a-ao-u /C' yt' f fi»POiCt> sneFiAAi t! -:ii i r ■V llL 1. 2. 3. 4. Hardcover in the 75-250' zone is approved at a level of 27.8%. All existing and proposed hardcover approved with :his variance approval is recorded in the calculation worksheet and diagram enclosed with this resolution as Page 3« That diagram also Indicates areas of existing hardcover which must be removed as part of this approval. The current property owner and all future owners of this property are placed on notice t''at hardcover shall not be Increased above the currently approved level and any proposed improvements of this property that will result in additional hardcover must be approved by the City. Such approval may result in a requirement for concurrent equivalent or greater removals of existing hardcover. All existing hardcover scheduled for removal as a condition of this resolution must be removed prior to the footing inspection for the new construction. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (September 23, 1992). Violation of or iion-coropliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has roao iJerstood and hereby agrees to the terms of cnis resc ! tion and n behalf of herself, her heirs, successors and assigi hereby agreej to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 4 of 6 w i;. u. h. R' & f,•r-ft P' I'- I. if-.. W' Mlnn«iota 1991. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of September, ATTESTI Dorothy M. Rallln, City clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner(a) STATE OP MINNESOTA ) ) S6. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 23rd day of September, 1991 ry Barbara A. Peterson ft Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor t city c. -'k ' ^-he City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and sai -ument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 5 of 6 I'IV -T' ciTT or oKmo r« 0* Box c' CTfstal « wi 473-7357 55323 ZONING PILE #1608 NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Notice: 9/17/91 fOt JMies Hertzell 127 Woodlawn St. Paul, MN 55105 COPIES TOs David Hoyt Dundee Nursery 1608 Highway 55 Plymouth, MN 55446 mm or applicationi variance BM or WBBTXNOi 9/16/91 fEt 4 For 1 Against flf laaliiii HI'>—anila tha tollowings Approval aubjact to conditions noted below AND BPBCZAL CONDITIONS t 1* Approval of 25* average setback variance. 3» Approval of 75-250' hardcover reduced to 27.8% per proposal. fy Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as Cit'> Council on Mondapf Saptasd>ar 23, 1991; to.eeting starts at 7i00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission Hiaatas, they are available from the city Recoiciu? after review and AKOPOVS 1 by the Planning Commission. iBV To: Date: Subject: Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator September 9, 1991 #1608 James Hartzell, 2987 Casco Point Road - Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing List of Exhibits A - Revised Calculations B - Revised Pool Plan C - Staff Sketch, Revised Hardcover Plan D - Lot Coverage Ordinance E - Notice of Planning Commission Action 8/20/91 F - Memo & Exhibits of 8/8/91 Discussion •i.iis item was tabled at your August meeting in order for the applicant to develop a revised proposal to limit the degree of hardcover increase. In the 75-250' zone, applicant originally proposed increases from 23.8% to 35.9%. The revised proposal reduces that increase to 27.3%. 75-250' Hardcover Existing 23.4%* Original Proposal 35.9% Revised Proposal 27.3% •Staff had originally listed this as 23.8%; applicant has re-measured sidewalks resulting in this correction. In comparing the current proposal with the original request, the following changes are apparent: - patios around pool have decreased from 1428 s.f. to 1050 s.f. - lineal feet of timber walls has been reduced - steps and walkways have been minimized - the 930 s.f. of gravel driveway in the 75-250' zone will be eliminated - the rock and plastic along the side of the house will be removed - if required, the water tower can be removed although it has some grass growing beneath it, and accounts for less than 1/2 of 1% hardcover. If the tower remains, the final 75-250' hardcover would be 27.8%. I:fe., .Mi ... Zoning File #1608 September 9, 1991 Page 2 Applicant ’s lot coverage calculation suggests that the intent is to keep the combination of retaining wall and ornamental fence lower than the 6' height at which the enclosed area would be considered as lot coverage. Under this proposal, the sod areas outside the pool patios would not be considered in lot coverage, yielding a final lot coverage of 13.1% under this interpretation . Mote that the Building Inspector has determined that because the patio is not continuous to the retaining wall, a fence above the wall is not strictly required even though the top of the wall is as much as 3 1/2* above grade. He would, however, encourage the use of plantings as a safety barrier. Staff RecaoBendation Under the revised proposal, based on the conditions and interpretations noted above, applicant requests the following; A. B. C. Hardcover variance to allow 27.3% {27.8% with tower) in 75-250' zone. Average setback variance of 25'. No lot coverage variance necessary. If Planning Commission feels the requested variances are justified and supported by adequate hardships, then a recommendation for approval would be in order. Options for recommendation include: 1. 2. 3. 4. Recommend approval as revised. Recommend partial approval, specifying limitations. Send on to Council, or request further revisions be brought back for review. Denial. Other. Isv c/vd'fKli j ST' (n-T - Mew feci'^tit^UtJow^t---4-H^sP -23> 47. f»(vJ<.+<-1^4''0 <1»'^'^t''‘l lO’^O^r. -nmU-M’ ory rf C«C^O Ji iSSao'^aj 'SEP e 'i«n 6'(41 Sf r * V’. « <:U(<t^ Will Kc^ncKVit iK 2'^*''^ 2 ' _S1>0 1.F U\)»l\'i’‘*rK'ife^/ ,‘:d'Eiii..*...Ji; »EX.cn5> 6&1, '.T-- zl.'SVc fr'')’‘5<^ Mr-Jeover ■frp'' ?7.7 UCoveV'ii'fte^ fi^w.vci.s on l4ev-^ Cte.i<^i ^fel2 U liotXSe. - ? "^eA - if'^ “Tovven- ~ ^ ' ■ Ogei- - 5ft pf.i - hiwWPk^Jft-‘ “d-rvrTr3^2.+.-.p,.*>. ^ *M w .ji <sr.'*’^»t.:» kt A»*~» • *“ti‘ <’ A . .c ^0'^' 4.fc7<- 09c^‘' 75■-^rt)' . |*/(ieeAs OF HMOcc'Ji£<t TZ) 6ef <?**<(n t: fc> .U fi?oP05et> trom cne pro^erry xine wnen said doors face on a public aixey or street, Subd. 14. Yards and Open Spaces. A. Reduction Prohibited. No yard or other open space shall be reduced in area or dimensions so as to make such yard or other open space less than the minimum required by the Zoning Chapter and if the existing yard or other open space as existing is less than the minimum required, it shall not be further reduced. B. Application to Only One Dwelling or Group. No required yard or other open space allocated to a building or dwelling group shall be used to satisfy yard, other open spaces, or minimum lot area requirements for any other building or dwelling group. C. Lot coverage. In all zoning districts, for all lots of 0-1.99 acre in total area, the total combined footprint areas of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 15% of the lot area. The following shall be included in calculation of lot coverage by structures; 1. All roofed structures which extend more than 6’ above grade level. 2. Tennis courts, patios, decks, and all similar "open" structures when partially or fully enclosed by fences, railings or walls which extend more than 6' above grade level (if any portion of such structures extends more than 6’ above grade level, the entire structure shall count toward lot coverage). 3. Pools, including pool basin and associated deck or patio areas, regardless of whether such pool basin, deck, or pat.lo is enclosed with a fence. 1 § 10.03 EXCEPTION. Regardless of lot area, every developed lot shall be allowed at least 1,500 square feet of lot coverage by principal residence and garage structures. D. Tennis courts, pools and paddocks or arenas, when such accessory structures exceed 1,000 s.f. footprint area, shall be subject to the following special setback restrictions; Front - 30' minimum and not within the required front yard nor between the front lot lln and the principal structure on the property Side - 30' minimum and not within the required side yard area CITY OP OROHO P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, NN 473-7357 ZONING PILE #1608 55323 NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Notice: 8/20/91 TOs Jeunes Hartzell COPIES TO: David Hoyt 127 Woodlawn Dundee Nursery St. Paul, MN 55105 1608 Highway 55 Plymouth, MN 55446 TYPE OP APPLICATION: Variance DATE OP NBBTIHG: 8/19/91 Planning CosBd.8sion recomends the following: Tabled for reasons noted below MOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: VOTE: 6 For 0 Against Applicant to submit revised design, limiting hardcover as much as possible (no specific direction as to a "goal" percentage was given). Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the September 16 meeting is September 6, or October 11 for the October 21 meeting. If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (473-7357). If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. Isv To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members Acting City Administrator Gerhardson From:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: August 8, 1991 #1608 James Hartzellr Variances - Public Hearing 2987 Casco Point Road - Zoning District: LR-lC, Single family lakeshore residential, 1/2 acre, sewered Description of Request: Requesting lot coverage and average setback variances (hardcover variance also required) to construct swimming pool and patio. Pertinent Ordinances 1. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 Existing = 23.8% Proposed = 35.9% Allowed = 25% - Hardcover. (75-250' zone) 2.Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - Average lakeshore setback - Proposing 25' encroachment past average setback line where no encroachment is normally allowed. 3.Section 10.03, Existing » Proposed = Allowed s Subdivision 8.3% 15.7% 15% 14 (C) - Lot coverage. Applicant's Statement of Hardship and Onui 1 Property <'x>7iditions 1. Pool area encroaches average s -v ine. because neighboring homes are si’rvjd far from lakeshore. 2.All homes along shore are set far off lakeshore and distanced considerably from where pool would sit. Pool would not have negative visual impact on these neighbors. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit P - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K - Application Plat Map Property Owners List Neighboring Property Owner's Letter of Support Survey Site Plan, Existing Site Plan, Proposed Applicant's Hardcover and Lot Coverage Calculations Staff Review of Hardcover and Lot Coverage Plan View, Proposed Pool and Patio/Landscape Areas Sketch, Average Setback Zoning File #1608 August 8, 1991 Page 2 of 3 Discussion The survey indicates that applicants own the adjacent residence to the south (3005 Casco Point Road), on a separate riparian lakeshore tax parcel. They also own the non-riparian lot upon which the tennis court sits. These two extraneous lots, because they are separate tax parcels, have not been included in the hardcover calculations. The hardcover review and site inspection by staff determined that applicants submitted hardcover worksheet had omitted significant areas of driveway, sidewalk, and the water surface area of the pool (this application was submitted in January, prior to the pool hardcover policy revision by Council). Existing 75-250' hardcover is 23.0%. Proposed hardcover without removals is 35.9%. The existing driveway serving applicant's property is fairly large, however, that driveway serves both of applicant's residences, and is mostly located in the 250-500' zone. Other than driveway areas, there is very little nonstructura 1 hardcover which can be removed to compensate for the hardcover excesses. The average setback encroachment of 25' is defined by the neighboring adjacent houses, one of which is owned by applicant. The top of the fence surrounding the pool will be approximately 7' above existing grade at a distance approximately 40' lakeward of the existing deck. The neighboring residence to the north is offset approximately 140' from the proposed pool and is relatively high in elevation compared to the pool. The applicant's house at 3005 Casco Point Road, has some lakeviews across the pool area already partially screened by existing trees and vegetation. Lot coverage will be slightly over the 15% limit when the pool is included in the calculation. Issues to Consider 1.Will any neighboring properties have their existing views of the lake negatively impacted by construction of this poo1/patio/retaining wall system? Is there sufficient hardship shown to justify approval of the proposed 25' average setback encroachment? (The pool will be 105' from the shoreline at its closest point). 2.Are there any potential structural removals or reductions which could keep this property within the 15% limit? Is there sufficient hardship to grant a variance for lot coverage? Zoning File #1608 August 12/ 1991 Page 3 of 3 3. 2. 4. Li Are there existing hardcover areas on the property which can be reduced or eliminated to compensate for the proposed hardcover excess? Is the fact that a single driveway and parking area serves two properties, with most of the hardcover on the lot with proposed pool, a potential justification for granting a variance? Are there other justifications for granting a hardcover variance, or a partial hardcover variance? Recoasendation Options 1. Recommend approval as proposed Partial approval, specify limitations, or table for review of revised plan. Send on to Council, 3« Denial. Other. iS!\.ni CITY OP OROHO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application 00^ {$50.00 per each addi^onal"Variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application)" After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) \ W PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address t f<T as£^' ' »»fv w* • »V 4 * . “wi •tt • . ww Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 2, a -//7“2.? l-f \ , V 0. . - - *1.’- J ^ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. « APPLICANT Phone (home) ^ - J~v r i Name /?. A/A^J.rtirC^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (work) ^vc-9'yr(>_ _ _ Address: ^_ _ _ _ _ City; 5'7 _ _ _ Zip: ~ ONNBR (if different than applicant) Phone (home)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- Phone (work)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Addfess: _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ City;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___Zip;- - - - -— Date Property Acquired _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . (month/year) — i'7; J-f ir^fdoh (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. ."-"wi _ _ _ _y — - — — — — — — - — — — - — — — — — — — — • — — • ^ PRESENT OSE OP PROPERTY . ... . V- *. y V Present Zoning District __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ • ’ I'l’''}, Present use of Property _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (Residen^iaj^.>.,\ rz'J ^ < 1,* /‘1*1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Other (specify) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DItSCRjpfXON OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ papliu*UtP Describe request in detail; V4irWl^d 4r/nr\ ^ nfdr —_ _ _ VARIANCES REQUIRED _ _ _ Lot Area _ _ _ Lot Width _ _ _ Hardcover Setback Variances (_ _ _ Front _ _ _ Side _Rear) Other_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A ■. HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning reQulationstyijsi ■:^T^»uK-iimr, — l(0i>^S -lyy? ~mr -ry^in jttLiL t-l ._________L------------------------ DESCRIPTION OF ONDSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventin'^^compliance with Zoning, Code Requirements; .ill ..'r:: rT >c* .'.vl - - -—- -———J— -—-—-—r\<‘7 REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 340-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. S)cetches or plans of floor and elevation views. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. •2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY dl" X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above h as not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff ;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her Icnowledge. i t /( Date OimSRS SIGNATURE Applicant' s Signature A (n.-: ■ /99t-' The owner hereby ac)cowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of ^this request. «Owner*8 Signature IT/Date A/Z-. /r /9 9r Applicant must have all submittals into ^e City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building t Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. («>/ IIS V N /(57) * / (^) *: / n i '2r«/ t ^ s ^ 3 11 9 j > • • % (So) / 4 i I ^> i*» I' f'3"^ '• •■ ^ 4 7 ’> i‘r ' Id ^'^-'(SJ) SeXi? p/ !:i ‘ *’«? « IvT- .• 3-»! “ !> ^ V’ •r J I # ^ 55 ‘ 1 (49) r:?' (jn TV S ■•‘--U: (►::) •f.O -1. 4l^* ,«■ * ✓ Sw^.fr L \0. ^ % C/“^^ / 14 ' ,5> A I (70) ^m W2 ' \_J X \ > ^ 1} I 1«11Wjr (^0) ^ h.‘■’.yC^ '0;i 1 /i <<^ — s iss (10) ( 17) 51 '• % ‘.^'ri 15« %1'5'9,1. :)'II -'■L -vt - *5 ^4 • • 1 ->: • ec "•N>« CO% 4« 44 43 */4i t.■UN MTC U^O/Wi' •UTCH 001 •>K^mEPIH COUKTY POOPEHTY INFOmMION SYSTEH PROPERTY (M€RS LIST REPORT NO. PI4SM01 PAGE 1 ONNER HAMi TAKPAVfR NAHE/AIHM TAXPAYIR NIMi/AOOR TAKPAYIR NANi/AOOR ONNiR NAME TAKPAYIR . NAMi/AOOR r r so to-ii7-n SI oosa omo CASCO POINT RO 0 A J NORRIS ORAOU y C OAKICt SffO CASCO POINT ID NAVZA/A m S5S91 S6 20*117-25 SI 00^5 02Y75 CASCO POINT RD STEHART R PERRY STENART R PERRY 2975 CASCO POINT ROAD NAY7ATA m 55191 SO 20-117*21 11 0061 02900 CASCO POINT RD C H HAACK I P NULLEN NAACK C H MA4CK A P NULLEN HAAC4 2900 CASCO POINT RD KAYZATA MN 55191 SO 20-1I7-2S SI 0069 00947 CAS :0 POINT RD TOD ROZESOON THEODORE 0 OESORAH ROZEOOQH 0967 CASCO PT RD NAYZATA m 55191 20-117-21 ir 0070 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED I CATHERINE HARTZEIL A CATHERINE HARTZELL LAI>t4 AVE MN 55105 10 20-117*21 19 0001 01015 CASCO POINT RO R G LAURIE ETAL R G LAURIE 1015 CASCO PT RO NAYZATA MN 55191 Si 20-1I7-2S 19 0020 0S020 CASCO POINT RD JOSEPH E SRAUN ET AL CAROL J KELLY S020 CASCO POINT RD NAYZATA m 55191 10 20-117-21 19 0021 02907 CASCO POINT RO JAMES R A CATHERINE HARTZELL JAMES R A CATHERINE HARTZELL 127 N000LAM4 AVE ST PAUL m 55105 10 20-117-21 19 0029 01005 CASCO POINT RD JANES R A CATHERINE HARTZELL JAMES R A CATHERINE HARTZELL 127 N000LA»#4 AVE ST PAUL m 55105 TOTAL 5ATCH 001 00009 I CERHEY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF NY KNONLEOGE AND BELIEF. DATE Steivakt R. Pirry Smaw ^ M. Perry Snaisc C. Perry Perry, Perry & Perry A ttorneys Law N orwest Bank Blilding 900 East Waveata Blvd.. Sute 110 Wavzata . Minnesota 55391 TiLtPHt)si;: (612) 473*0130 FAX: (612)473-0184 September 22, 1990 Mr. Jim Hartzell 2987 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Dear Jim: You explained to me that the City requires a letter from your abutting neighbors giving permission to build a swlmining pool off of your back deck. I understand that the pool will extend beyond the line of my house towards the lake and that is why the letter is necessary. You stated it was to be a ground level pool. You have my permission to proceed as you wish. You may use this letter in any way as you see fit. If this is not sufficient, please let me know. I will certainly cooperate in anv'Vay I can. f 4^. * ^-r f^A€bCa/efi. '7s-ZtD' :■ ? -------- ?• S-,' .V./»yV?5;'-'V •^ Lsi 'To^J f(?oPOie^ ^\Te?u^ ii ' l k *./ .X [ rl ): 1^'r- i- ,fT' ^‘v r/. ••* HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKS^E^ SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE cne) 0-/E^ /:—5Q" j 25D^00' SQQrlOl Existing Hardcover in Zone ^ —T' rr -L“ f#TAi. IlMecovtii in lam - 41 ^ • A. House x - - - - LENGTH WIDTH % s «• ' :S^\ 0 l!a X /» HorvcwAV X ^ « X n ^ r ncwAi \t X X X ^9^0 6. ’ATIO/ Deck ..••.;>c;v V¥>\ . • AREAS UNDERLAIN PV X p PLASTIC SHEETING X » X 1 8. _ _ X - - - - - - •I'c , S.F . S.F. S*P S.F. S • r • S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. , S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. t.r. Totm. AmMITV MIA IN lam h i >-Z [D 0 4 X II ' t.p* % HARDCOVER C.ALC0UTI0N WORKSHEET SS73ACK ZONE: (C'.P.CLz ONE) 0-75' 75-250' Existing Hardcovs.s in Zone 250-5CC' 50C-::C0' • A. H ouse LENGTH WIDTH r X s 5. - t s S . r* X 5.?. X S.F. 3.Sarage .X S.F. C.Driveway y S.F. X 0.Sidewalk / X S.F. X S.F. X S.F. E. ,Jatio / Deck X S.Fi F.Landscape X s S.F.areas UNDERLAIN BY X s S.F.PLASTIC SHEETING X S.F. X S.F. G. Other X * S.F. Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone -7 - S.F. s -^HJ _ _ S.F. ^ X100 - I f-i^A.. y--' I /^'c. ^t£K. ^ To: Proa: Date: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator/ Mayor Petersen and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator September 18, 1991 Subject: #1626 Tim Traff/Eric Wilson - 2683 North Shore Dr. - Revised Site Plan - Review for Consistency with Resolution #2960 List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Letter of Request Proposed Site Plan Proposed Building Plan Resolution #2960 Comparative Site Plans Discussion Mr. Traff was granted lot width and lot area variances in May, 1991, in addition to a 5.5* side setback variance in order to construct a new residence. He has now sold the property to Eric and Kristal Wilson, who are proposing a slightly different house footprint. The changes were determined by staff to be significant enough to trigger Council review. The subtle differences between the Traff and Wilson site plans are as follows: 1.The Wilson plan slightly changes the angle of the residence in relation to lot lines. 2.The bulk of the house is slightly further away from the lake in the Wilson plan. 3.The Wilson's triple garage is locaced off the easterly wing of the house rather than the westerly wing. 4.The entire length of the Wilson garage is proposed to be 24.5* from the side lot line (totaling 200 s.f.), in addition to a 120 s.f. portion of house. In the Traff plan, only a portion of house encioached past the 30* setback line. In total, about 320 s.f. of building foo'cprint will encroach past the 30* setback line with the Wilson plan. The Traff plan had 150 s.f. of encroachment. The proposed plan holds to the 25% hardcover limitation in the 75-250* zone. / ? • r I Zoning File #1^26/»» September 18« 1991 Page 2 Issues to Consider 1.Remembering that the variance runs with the property, not with a specific applicant, the question to consider is whether the revised plan meets the spirit and intent of the Council in approving the variances for Traff's site plan. 2.Will the encroachment of the 3-car garage into the 30' side setback create visual density problems that are not inherent in the Traff proposal? 3.Is there any change in the impact on neighboring properties resulting from the revised plan? If so, would input from the adjacent property owners influence Council's final decision on this request? Note that the Planning Commission reviewed the request briefly and informally at their September 16 meeting, and generally agreed that the changes should be reviewed by Council, but did not discuss the specifics of the request. Staff Re lendation Council may wish to consider the following optional courses of action: 1. 2. 3. Approve the revised site plan as proposed. Approve with revisions. Conceptually approve, direct applicanc to revise (give specific direction). 4.Refer to Planning Commission for formal recommendation (does Council wish that neighboring property owners be renotified?). 5.Conceptual denial based on increase area of encroaching footprint. 6.Other. Applicants wish to get started with construction as soon as possible. If this item was referred back to the Planning Commission for their October 21 meeting, it would be placed on the October 28 Council agenda. Isv pfelt: ‘»i" miM M' p-w ^■, u;. r^-W,m\ ^Iv-m life t#pi^vv ‘fe.’-; F*,' pfe:'--'testis’ *01 rllK'S GArrriGN “ ASST ?■LA^lNI^4lJ ?< FROM: ERIC KRI3TAL WILSCM RE: 3683 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - # 1 DATE: SEPTEMBER 9. i99i ZCNll'-S AI.-INrS-^A^CP Thank *'^u for* meeting utith us earlier today and giving us some guidancs m this process. As we mentioned in our meetingr we have entered into an agreement wicn Tim and Beth Xi-aff to purchase their home at 3603 North Shore Drive. W# jtre scheduled to close the sale on October 1, 199< and would like to Start construction of our home In early N< ember. Ae you know, the Traffs were intending to builr a new home on this property themeelves. In anticipation of that, they applied for side setback, lot area and lot width variances in Marcn 1991. Gn May 13, I99i the Council granted "y^ralancee to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.33. Subdivision 6 <B) to allow construction of a new residence on a lot 119' in width where 200'in width is normally required, being 1.01 acres in area whore a 2.0 acre lot area ie normally required, and allowing a 34.S' east side lot line eetback where a 30' side setback is normally required, subject to" several conditions. have engaged our own architect to design a heme to meet our particular family needs. As the heme is slightly (^iffsrent than that which was previously submitted to the Council for variance approvals, we are taking the initiative jKking for the Council's continued suoport. Enclosed please find from our architect a site plan, flcorplan, elevetlQ"t survey and hard cover calculation. As in the previous request, we are net laokino for a hard variance. The enclosed hard cover calculation shows we are within all limitations. QyrjjjcA-____________ £tiLLj££fi&..£ gen ter af _____________ mddltianal Protection of the Mitchell' It Should be noted 'that the two proposed encroachments ovei^ the usual 30' s^^e setbacks are only one-story structur^ and are within the previously approved E4.5' east side lot line eetback variance* ere eNClted about our project and are particularly delighted about the prospects of living in Orono, & hi ATlOig K.ksc rr^erJ C^‘> pcf *'* i / \ M’ J r\ fei- ' "* .._ -.su: I I I I I r Cas. /HC0^^ ■iTw.au/) ‘ EVEVA'TjOfsJ ♦rt|’ • « -o* i? ■j{ “'■>;■• I %• ‘ f ---------------'•W'' ■is*r :4* r- - ■ f-:: O CITY of ORONO * p 1 ^ \ A ■ -• • r ’ii 4C RZSCLUTION GF THE CITY COU.\C!L NO.I A R2SOLUT10N GRANTING variances to MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.23r SUBDIVISION 6 (B) FILE #1626 Shore Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter C.t/ ) a..a legally described as follows: Tract B, Registered Land Survey #1373, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property**); and area where a 2.0 acre lot area is nornally requirea, and beir. located“ll- from the east side lot line where a 30’ srde lot line setback is normally required. NOW* THEREPOREr BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council Or Orono, Minnesota; FINDINGS X •This application was reviewed as Ccninc File #1626. 2. The property is located in the LP-IA Single Famili Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission on March 18-20, 1991, and on a vote of 3-1, approval of the lot width and lot area variances, and denial of the side setback variance, finding that; ‘Urr/i^^l-Vl rcie“iS\^::f%nd date of current zoning regulations. The property is served with municipal sewer. Pace 1 of 5 ^Oa-o o CITY of OfiONO • A. • *^^£:sho ^ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNC!L NO.^ W -r » V tSr“ty t"th°eS40- lot that time, property was «ned f^ lot area at ®i|th variance granted in area requirements. The lo existing improvements 1974 was strictly to ,|a5 North Shore Drive associated „;rt«atec? wMle facing the Traff r^^d^c^f SicS w\rpreviously a for 2685 North Shore Drive, on a separate lot. D) The «*4Sting residence IS J,oca..ed a- from the east side lot line. j-esidence proposed to be demolished and a nev %«eee4.r-ii4-*«d 24.5' fTom the side• - - •> i ^ I f ^ nm side lot linef it xS “h*‘hhVlV 'ea/ible to construct a new residence 5ilh^u\ the ne'ed for a side setback variance. 4. The City council reviewed th® _aPPlicatio^lncl^^^^^^^^^ findings and recommendation of aoolicants and the reports by City staffs heal**'h * safety and welfare ofeffect of the variances on the heal -h,^ aa£«y the community on . . width, lot area and 5.5’ side nth:r:iriL^%%’r^ba°sy on thl following findings: A) -^he findings of the Planni.ng Commission support appr'ovai of the lot area and width variances as proposed. B) Although it is re,”ir^%“n«r^tL%h"a;: residence meeting all s ,„d'narrowing of the building Views from the operty C) Further, the granting of a 5.5’ side variance in Jt^'side setback of theresidence, in"««ses the east side sern ^ Pace 2 of 5 o o % * Jt _ I :•/- A •• CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL The applicer.re have ------'^hardcover variance and will consorucr ...e ...w to meet Orono's hardcover regulations. lUe^ihorr st?ba“k '’irne®^br'^the° Toints on dta^t "ThVr e "o rV *p ”= v i dfn g' *’1 AVc n a 1 ^rotectfon oVtie Mltohe'lls’ lakeviews and .ore than meeting minimum City requirements. 5. The City Council f^ds^that the this property are pecu la ^ d'st'"i''t; that granting the to other property A'^ect traffic conditions, variances would not other danger to light, air nor pose a > ^ ^ ‘I serve as a neighboring ^^ica'nts^r^ but is'necessary toconvenience to the appiica ... ni^^icultv; is alleviate a demonstrable . nrooe’-tv riaht of the necessary to ^e'^in'kieoinc with* the spirit and ?S?L^r^"^ih:1onrn^^^od%^"nd^comprehensive Plan of the City. C' .CUaSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or nore of the orono City Counoil hereby grants of a code section 10.23. ‘ Jhe?e 200 ’ in width is new residence on a lot 118 a 2.0 acre lot normally required, being 1. allowing a 24.5 ’ east side lot nr. «tb:?K*ihi;rn“Yo^‘^UTe%'‘eVb:ok normally reguired. subject to the following conditions: 1. prior to issuance of a building pem.it, applicants shall provide the following: A) certificate of Survey J*^ify^"^/*’26e|"orth ‘s^ho^e S?i^%rnn^”%rx^\^ing"tba*t the propo.^ house meets the redefined average lakeshore indicated in Exhibit A. B) Sit. grading plan, contou-s, to be reviewed by the C*ty sta.- as p the normal building permit review process. ^ 4T O vVo o • A. 1 ■<' ■■ ■V CITY of ORONO RESOLUTIO.'J OF THE C!TV COUNCIL NO. - -________ 2 Anol'can^s are advised that any portions of the grade- time that those improvenents may be proposed. 3. Hardcover on the property shal^ ti\°;::T-75'%o “n%ri5" “ t\% zone, and 30. in the 250-500' zone. 4. Authorities grantea by ^^2^ are'oermissi ve oniy property not with the app "for a*bu''‘'ding permit within one vear of the cate ot variance will e.xpire on t.hat date (May 1., 199.). e. violat'on o^ or non-comoliance with any of t-.e .erms and 5e vioiat-oa o» wi - .-II -.a.♦...a-a a ♦•'clation or conditions of this variance s* a * •.-aX^ira-e anv authority 6. The undersigned applicants ha- hereby agree to the terns of assigns, hereby S|rleTo*ihrrecSldin, of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the City Cooncil °5^ “Tig!'.esota at a regular meeting held on the 13th day o . y. ~y>n /6dAU‘^ ^'all^f Ci^ycfe^^^ Barbara A. Peterson# Mayor Page 4 of 5 o o A.- CITY of ORONO 9 m ' ‘ ** - • < ■•^^bsbO^ resolution of the city council NO. _________ STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ] SS. The 'orecoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13th day of May, 199-, .y aaroar orono, a Minnesota Hallin, Mayor 4 Crty Clarn or the _C y ^ehalf municipal corporation and ^ns^^-me*. of the City. iMrjjifb" Jihh ^TA A /ac<J- notary public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) } SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) 199/ appeared ^sf S^Sgribed and who ' executed THEHESA L NAAB NOTAinr rutuo * uiNNcsorA HENNEPIN COUNTYm------------- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this ________ day of 199 before me a g:t»y%;igIIT^ithL°fnd for said CoulT^par-so-alXy ap^p»rea ______ ” _______S 4. K A me to be the ^ ® ^ doed t^^a't heVheyf^eVelrut ed NOTARY PUBLIC Pace 5 of 5 V i. — t ^7. 57* t /VO«m«l- A^CafiAiJe j /A»i^SHo^e s«j^ack /i>^e -. ♦ .V • - •:/ \ * ^.•* -f\ ^ /I f'-■.)■ V--' ^! ('<>)■ ‘‘.'r.'» il.-!,f j r^rj! 1"r, -Lr.-. ^3 /'"’ ’X I I'i/’ .*/ '^v-' OlV t'” : .■ '’*•** •'' ^vL : V/ •—J o 7i/^/ ^c/U4.t - -• - /---- ZI9 0JL — -J-* r,p^A Sha^chnc on 9^ It'S? ^ L^lk^c £xrt*6iT A ^2es6cuT74#^ #Xif u - /vioT” 7T5 - y.: To:Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council City Administrator Moorse \ Froa: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrate^ September 19, 1991 #1668 City of Orono - 700 Old Crystal Bay Road North - Final Subdivision - Resolution Mylars of the final plat have yet to be finalized by the City Surveyor, Mark Gronberg, because of delays at the County but mylars should be prepared within the next week. The enclosed final plat drawing reflects the final lot lines and drainage easements to be shown on those mylars. In light of the pending sale of the property to the City, staff has scheduled the plat for Council action at the 23rd of September meeting rather than wait until the October 14th to officially approve the plat. Drainage easements will be shown over the designated wetland at 1017,7 elevation and the area within 26' of wetland and shall also include the 100 year flood plain elevation based on the final grading plans for the comprehensive City facility at the 1018.7 elevation. The wetland elevation is shown at the 26* setback from the 1017.7 elevation. Any future filling or grading activities below the 1018.7 elevation will require review and approval by the City and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The enclosed resolution approving the final plat of the City of Orono Addition has been drafted for your review and approve-. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OP THE CITY OF ORONO ADDITION APPLICATION NO. 1668 NHBREASf the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS# the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly# economic and safe dev’elopment of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application of the City for a subdivision of a two lot plat; and WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all standards of the current RR“1B zoning district finding that each lot is of a size and configuration that will allow its use to be fully developed without the need of any variances; and WHEREAS, the City has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City of Orono, including: 1. Completion of all the requirements of Resolution No. 3015. 2. Dedication on the plat of Rights of Way for a public road shown as Outlot A. 3. Bill Gagne of the Gagne Land Company and the City have a9reed to install sewer and water lines within Outlot A at the time of the construction of the access road. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the 7 c.y of Orono hereby approves the plat of The City of Orono Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to the following conditions: 1, Access to Lot 1, Block 1 shall be provided from Outlot A. This property shall be limited tc one additional curb cut along Old Crystal Bay Road based on the length of frontage adjacent to roadway. Lot 1, Block 2 shall achieve access only from Outlot A or the future public road. No direct access onto U.S. Highway 12 shall be permitted. Page 1 of 2 2. Applicant and future owner of Lot 1, Block 1 is hereby advised that any future land alterations proposed below the 1018.7 elevation [100 year flood plain elevation] shall require a conditiional use permit. If land alterations are proposed within the designated wetland portion of the drainage easement defined at the 26’ setback from the 1017.7 elevation of the wetland sha 11 require a conditional use permit and variance application. 3. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Hennepin County Recorders Office or Registrar of Titles Office on or before March 23, 1992, together with the certified original copy of this Resolution. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this 23rd day of September, 1991. ATTEST; Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Pete son, Mayor Page 2 of 2 TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor Peterson and City Council %/. Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Admin, Septemoer 18, 1991 SOBJLCT: #1669 John W. Walker, 1310 Spruce Place - Variance - Resolution Zooiog District - LR-IB Single Family Lak'^sho., acre - Sewered . 1 dent ia 1 - 1 Application - Request for after-tne-fact hardcover variances to construct 2 story addition and decK addition. List of Exhibits CxhlDlt A Exhibit B Exhibit C Discussion - Resolution Notice of Planning Commission Action 9/16/91 Memo and Exhibits of 9/9/91 Please re' aw the memo and exhibits of September 9th. Briefly, applicant intends to construct a second story aoove n existing one story residence. A portion of the addition :s ovc-r an area which was not previously structural hardcover. Additionally, a deck expansion is proposed. Hardcover prior to this project is 13.7% in the P-75' zone, and 50.6% (including lined landscaped beds) in the 75-250* zone. Applicant proposes to reduce hardcover to oe1ow the pre-1975 levels which applicant reports as 14.1% and 31.2% •, espect i vely. This project was started witnout t‘e necessary ouildinn permits or variance approval. v.’ork has oe n stopped since approximately August 1st, although applicant was allowed to continue mechanical work under a prior separate permit. Planoiog CoMissioo ReconeDdatioD Planning Commission tabled the initial proposal in mid Auc ist, directing applicant to provide a plan that would reduce hardcover to pre 1975 levels. At the Septemoer 16th meeting. Planning Commission voted 3/2 to approve hardcover reductions to 7.2% in the i-75* zone and 30.4% in the 75-250' zone. The m.inority Planning Commission opinion v/as tnat hardcover should decrease even more, to approach the 25% standard. Planning Commission voted 5/0 that the applicant snould be charged the after-the-fact fee for t j zoning application based on a significant amount of wor< ta-'.ing place on tne site after applicant was advised to stop due to the need for ■•ariances. File #1669 Page 2 Staff ReconBendatioD Staff recommends approval per the Planning Commission's majority vote. A resolution reflecting the Planning Commission's action is attached for Council review. The resolution can be revised to reflect whatever action Council takes. A RBSOLOTION GRANTING AN AFTER-THB-PACT VARIANCE TO M0MICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 FILE #1669 WHEREAS, John W. Walker (hereinafter "the applicant") is the ovmer of the property located at 1310 Spruce Place within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally aescribed as follows: Lots 7 and 8, Block 10, Saga Hill Revised, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for an after-the-fact variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit the construction of a second story addition and deck additions to an existing residence, such additions comprising hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone in excess of the 25% hardcover normally allowed. WOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Ci.y Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning Pile #1669. The property is located in the LP .? single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on August 19 and September 16, 1991, and on a vote of 3 to 2 recommended approval of the proposed after-the- fact variance based upon the following findings: Based on information supplied by the applicant, hardcover on the property prior to 1975 included 14,1% in the 0-75' zone and 31.2% in the 75-250' zone. Since that time, hardcover on the property increased to 18.7% and 50.6% respectively. These hardcover increases consisted mainly of lined landscape beds and a brick patio area. Retaining walls were also constructed to stabilize the steep lakeshore bank. All of this work was done without City review or approval. Page 1 of 6 ilk..,.,. 4. After having discussed the proposed second story addition with the building inspectors, applicant’s contractor with applicant's knowledge proceeded with the construction project, apparently under an incorrect assumption that it was possible to eliminate enough hardcover to meet Code requirements. When the building inspectors found the work underway, a Stop Work Order was posted. This work was found to be occurring approximately 1 week after application for hardcover variance was submitted. The applicant has agreed to remove lining materials from all landscaped beds on the property, and further has agreed to remove a currently existing portion of deck encroaching into the 0-75' zone where no structure is normally allowed, and has agreed to remove a large portion of brick patio located in both 0-75* and 75-250' zones, and is reducing portions of sidewalk in the 75-250* zone. The net result of such hardcover removals is a decrease in hardcover from the pre- 1975 level of 14.1% to a proposed level of 7.2% in the 0-75' zone, and from a pre-1975 hardcover at 31.2% in the 75^250* zone, down to 30.4% proposed. The proposed hardcover removals exlibit a good faith effort on the part of the applicant to reduce hardcover as much as possible without having a negative impact on the use of the property. The Planning Commission rejects the applicant's arg\unent that actual hardcover percentages can be reduced based on the existence of an inground drainage absorption system, because the capability and reliability of that system has not been adequately demonstrated. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the after-the-fact variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5.The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply Page 2 of 6 CALCULATIONS FOR 75-250' CALCULATION FOR 0-75' ITEM PRE 75 PRESENT $h«d 97 97 97 Brick St«ps 60 60 60 Brick Patio 250 340 90 Rataining Wall 63 88 88 Concrata Steps 114 114 114 Brick Stapa 48 48 48 Staps 12 12 12 Part of wood deck Landscapa areas 38 38 0 w/landscape cloth 310 520 0 TOTAL S,F. 7025 992 1317 509 PCRCEHT 14.121 18.7% ITEM PRE 75 PRESENT House 737 787 882 Garage 590 590 590 Brick walk 44 44 44 Sidewalk 308 195 163.5 Retaining walls 0 39 19 Deck 262 262 296* Driveway 2300 2300 2300 Entrance Stoop 113 113 0 Landscape with cloth or plastic 0 2740 0 Steps 9 9 9 Brick Patio 0 96 0 TOTAL S.F.4413 7155 4294.5 PERCENT 31.21 50.61 (^0.4\ •.ri'itim- .'fX'9 . (M'l • »•■• ■*, \ -T \ \ \ JJy Cf- cr/A-^yf 71 ^ c /f73'T'rO *r;e<z. •*<» r<^ • • V _____ ffrrv ^ ‘ ^ l LI ^cr rt:*O, Q \rcr^. w* tc. i- KJ»^ ^ ^ ir» /^l ^ O' --- — ‘‘f -p----------» ^yy^4%. r*ir • -- i^i4»»* ■ ■ .............................................. _/• » . ^ » • ^ % *• . ^ . i r 1 .«— __ •i.r<> —> . I Cx*-S> f%0£^L -rc r.'t~ ce» ;»ri^ Jo>iv 1^ fi-r^ U.-ck^i, ' i' 0 5/)^i,.«^ '■/lor-^ j I* * /C^/v^v'cr'N Paovs 3 of C f generally to other property in this zoning district: that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit rnd intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of he City. CONCLDSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants an after-the-fact variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit the construction of second story addition and deck addition to the existing residence, such additions constituting hardcover in excess of the 25% hardcover normally allowed in the 75-250* zone, subject to the following conditions: 1.Hardcover in the 0-75* zone is approved at a level of 7.2%. Hardcover in the 75-250* zone is approved at a level of 30.4%. All existing and proposed hardcover approved with this variance approval is recorded in the calculation worksheet and diagram enclosed with this resolution as Page 3. Said diagram depicts the existing hardcover areas that must be removed. The current property owner and all future owners of this property are placed on otice that hardcover shall not be increased above the currently approved level and any proposed improvements of this property that will result in additional hardcover must be approved by the City. Such approval may result in a requirement for concurrent equivalent or greater removals of existing hardcover. All existing hardcover scheduled for removal as a condition of this resolution must be removed prior to continuation of any work on the construction underway. 2.Prior to any further work on this project, applicant*s contractor shall obtain an after-the-fact building permit. Further, applicant shall pay the after-the- fact investigation fee for the variance application, in the amount of $175.00. Page 4 of 6 ''I:., 3. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (September 23, 1992). 4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and con'itions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of herself, her heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Mir «esota at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of September, 1991. ATTEST t Dorothy M, Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 23rd day of September, 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 5 of 6 :iTY OP ORONO P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 473-7357 ZONING PILB <1669 55323 NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Notice: 9/17/91 TO:John W. Walker COPIES TO: Dick Schieffer 1310 Spruce Place 730 East Lake St. Mound, MN 55364-9628 Wayzata, MN 55391 TXPB OF APPLICATION: Variance 0 ■*.V--f- ■ ^ V-'l ■ OATS OP NBBTING: 9/16/91 Planning CcasdLsslon rerniif nds the following: Approval subject to conditions noted below HOTB8 AMD SPECIAL CONDITIONS: VOTE: 3 For 2 Against Planning Commission recommended approval of hardcover variances subject to: 1. Reduction of 0-75' hardcover to 7.2% per the plan proposed. 2. Reduction of 75-250' hardcover to 30.4% per the plan proposed. Planning Commission further recommended on a vote of 5 - 0 to charge the after-the-fact fee for the variance application. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as City Council on Monday, September 23, 1991; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. lev u To:Chairman Kelley and Planning Comirission Members City Administrator Moorse Proa:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: September 9, 1991 #1669 John W. Walker, 1310 Spruce Place - Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing Note: Applicant has provided a revised deck/hardcover proposal, and requested a 50% hardcover credit for the house and garage based on the surface water catchment system currently in place. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Letter of Request Hardcover Calculations Revised Site/Hardcover Plan Applicant's Appeal to Council 8/22/91 Planning Commission Action Notice 8/19/91 Memo & Exhibits of 8/13/91 Discussion The applicant has slightly reduced the size of the proposed deck that will be replacing the existing deck, although a new deck along the south side of the house is still proposed. Applicants have indicated the hardcover items in both the 0-75' and 75-250' zones which they will remove to result in decreases. The pre-1975 hardcover situation has also been defined by the applicant (there are no City records which could confirm this). Please review the letter from applicant's attorney, and the hardcover calculations as well as the attached sketch. Applicants request a 50% credit for the house and garage contributions to hardcover based on the use of an underground catchment system which retains the bulk of the surface water drainage in underground perforated tubing. This system apparently allows for the absorption of the run-off underground, rather than allowing it to run overland towards the lake. In theory, this is an excellent system and would seem to meet the City's water quality enhancement objectives. In practice# the applicant has been pleased with tne function of this system. A technical evaluation of this system is beyond the scope of this review. The capacity of the system and its current condition are not documented. While Planning Commission might wish to discuss the merits of using this drainage system to justify granting a hardcover variance, staff would recommend against giving some hardcover percentage credit to this system Zoning File «166' September 9, 1991 Page 2 Without the drain system credit, applicant's hardcover reductions are p* -lunarired as follows: HARDCOVER SUMMARY Pre-1975 Current Proposed 0-75* 75-250* 14.1% 31.2% 18.7% 50.6% >po 7.2% 30.4% After the August Planning Commission meeting, the applicant appealed to the Council requesting that they be allowed to continue construction in exchange for the Walker's agreement to bring the property into conformance with the hardcover ordinance subject to variance approval. The Council denied the request, but suggested that this item could be brought directly to the September 23 Council meeting after a Planning Commission recommendation is obtained. Staff Recommendation Staff would recommend against numerically reducing the hardcover percentage based on the inground drainage system. However, if Planning Commission feels that the proposed reductions in the 0-75' and 75-250' zones to hardcover levels below the pre-1975 levels justify the granting of hardcover variances, then a recommendation for approval would be in order. What is Planning Commission's recommendation regarding requiring the after-the-fact fee for the zoning application? (After-the-fact fee will automatically be charged for the building permit). Isv tf- Johnson & Wood . p. a * • V ' \ ¥ : * - • A ^ / V ’ M ' \ r ^ ' ' ' “• I • I ! • H » •.» • . ; ■ ■ I ^ . . I - September 6, 1991 Planning Commission City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: John and Pat Walker Residence 1310 Spruce Place Dear Planning Commission Members: We enclose for your review, calculations of hardcover at 1310 Spruce Place, describing the hardcover which existed in 1975, the present conditions, and the proposed conditions. Also enclosed is a site plan showing the locations of the hardcover and other information. In addition to these documents, we have the following comments: 1.The applicants are sensitive to the ordinance requirements for minimum hardcover in the area nearest the lake. Accordingly, the pre-1975 hardcover in the 0 to 75 foot zone is being reduced from 992 square feet to 509 square feet, a reduction of approximately 50%. 2.The i^plicants are removing all landscaping cloth in order to comply with the City’s interpretation of the ordinance which apparently provides that all landscaping cloth ■institutes hardcover. 3.The applicants propose to remove all patio areas which were added since 1975. 4.The applicants request a 50% credit against the hardcover created by the house and garage because the surface water catchment system retains the bulk of this drainage for absorption in underground perforated tubing. This credit would bring the hardcover down to 25.1%. • . . . Planning Conunission September 6, 1991 Page Two 5.The reconfiguration of the deck not onl'' nioves it from the C to 75 foot zone but also extends 84 square feet thereof over soft cover area. The proposed deck with gaps between the deckboard is readily permeable to surface water and the applicants request that the Planning Commission so interpret the proposed deck. This results in a total hardcover reduction of 84 feet which brings the proposal, including a credit for the drainage system, down to 24.6%, making a formal variance unnecessary. If credit is not given for the drainage system, the hardcover percentage comes down to 29.7%. In summary, hardcover in the o to 75 foot zone is being reduced by 50% from the pre-1975 levels, and hardcover in the remainder of the property is being reduced by 2.7%. If both of the requested credits are given (deck overhanging softcover and catchment system) hardcover in the 75 to 250 foot zone ordinance limits. rainwater is within Sincerely, RJS/mc Enclosure cc: John and Pat Walker John & Pnt Walkor 1310 spruco Place Proposed Variance CALCULATION FOR 0-75' ITEM PRE 75 PRESENT PROPOSED Shed 97 97 97 Brick Steps 60 60 60 Brick Patio 250 34C 90 Retaining Wall 63 88 88 Concrete Steps 114 114 114 Brick Steps 48 48 48 Steps 12 12 12 Part of wood deck 38 38 0 Landscape areas w/landscape cloth 310 520 0 TOTAL S.F. 7025 992 1317 509 PERCENT 14.12%18.71 7.2% Present to Proposed Reduction of 61.4% CALCULATIONS FOR 75-250' ITEM PRE 75 PRESENT PROPOSED DRAIN SYSTEM House 787 787 882 441 Garage 590 590 590 295 Brick walk 44 44 44 44 Sidewalk 308 195 163.5 163.5 Retaining walls 0 19 19 19 Deck 262 262 296*296* Driveway 2300 2300 2300 2300 Entrance stoop 113 113 0 0 Landscape with cloth or plastic o 2740 0 0 Steps 9 9 9 9 Brick Patio 0 96 0 0 TOTAL S.F.4413 7155 4294.5 3558.5 PERCENT 31.2%50.6%30.4%25.1% Present to Proposed Reduction of 40.0%[Sl.4%] DRAIN SYSTEM Fifty percent allowance for rainwater catchment system. * Includes 84 s.f. of deck that overhangs soft cover. -I'si-u ^r- ^1, % i '<• . t . -;. .' •?' ';r s; I' :,'r.. I if- |r; %K LAW OFF CES y ] Johnson & Wood PCTWWIOHNSOfi jomi w. woo. QASVLPWlOtft WAMIN V. lIQCtOW. JA 73 0 E> ’T STREET WAYZ.‘T-< MTNNESOTA 55391 TEir'^HONE iS121 4751515 TEl *^ COPTER ^12; 475-03 M Of CCMMtL EARLE J. NICOERLUEOCE IAMES 0 Mac KINNOR MmSM. VmiVRA WnJMIIEBOimG ANMCSCIIUU homde scHicFm THOMAS A. 9CMULCN0ERC. II legal Assamm 2)05 COMMERC" tOUlEVARO mount >I1NNES0TA SS364 TELiPHONC («1 ‘) 47J I050 TELStOPlER 612? 472 4103 DAVTO i HERZUCK EDrrH L MINSHALL REPUr TO V'^JTATA August 22, 1991 r CITY or OROMO biiHeiio^^Ti Mayor and city Council City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Alfc a e 1991 Re: John and Pat Walker Residence 1310 Spruce Place Dear Mayor and Council: This is a request to give direction to City staff to issue a Building Permit being withheld under City policies which require that Building Permits be issued until hardcover issues are resolved. On July 1, 1991, Roncor Corporation applied for a Bu^xOing Permit to add a second story to the residence of John and Pat Walker at 1310 Spruce Place. (See Zoning Administrator’s chronology attached.) Staff review noted that hardcover exceeded permitted limits. Roncor and the Wr-lkers explored with staff ways to reduce hardcover. The Walkers prepared necessary surveys, hardcover calculations which reduced hardcover from 50% to 32% in the 75-250 foot zone. The Walkers request that a post-1975 retaining wall (whv;h includes landscaping rock with ciotn -ierXay) in the O- '5 :!oot zone be permitted to halt erosion ana jff migration. u ? ^ - Walker cite in favor of approval, a rooftop water catchment and drainage system, bluff migration and erosion, adjacent unimprovea right-of-way for sumj area, unusual lot configuration and topography. The Planning Commission teUaled to September 16, 1991 suggesting "a return to pre-1975 hardcover levels . . "• (See notice attached.) J Mayor and City Council August 22, 1991 Page Two Mr. and Mrs. walker h. ve a mortgage commitment which before construction can oe completed given the t:able and carrying costs which are mounting. The Walkers are living in the l^er level of a home occupied by their daughter in the interim. In the event the City Council agrees to permit the staff to iSe BuUdiSg Permit, the Walkers agree to bring the property into conformance with the hardcover ordinance by removal of the hardcover, by variance from the terms of the ordinanc , y combine' ion of the two. Sincerely, JOHNSPN & W^D RJS/mc Enel — /3/0 leikc. JJdOl. Jdl, c. -tTDcju^ I '✓ £■ \£j^------- J. ^ L<^—s.(4.tt»iLLZiSdd. r^MJ. L.JJe^ -k yj ........... iO/ i.t'k'vo aeJc:*•"1 ’ M. a^d D-lC-____—__-_____ ______7 7^ _______/<^/osc:0e "Tb J^kiicd^g. ? ^ » ,:_______^— ----------------------------------------------------------- .^{w__4^c:e_ ^^"/“j— ho4- e._^e£fi5tu^ r^'^— .lx^.:>,./^. /^'>^uU' MfiiejeX 4or O^-cir^-----------------'hvi'a u(€-_t<>W!^ neigOgfL 1-:^SV oPlO^^ -/^Uf. ■'t-tyii . Qoin- g-/Po£ .1 f h. ................... •' t* ^1 < » * CITY OF ORONO ZONING FILE #1669 ?: MM 55323 notice OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIOM ^7357 Date of Notice: 8/20/91. . . . . . . . . .. C^piErTO: ScMeffe.-^^ ioiSd?'’SS'%53S"9628 .......... _ «M «« TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance _____________________________________________ nAra’orioBTMOr’s/ip/n’’' vote : 6 For 0 Against PlmniJi? CoBai.88i.on recoBnend8 tAe following. Tabled for reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: mwT >1 BA ♦■Kat- ann 1 icant can provide an alternate proposa 1 for h.rdcov.r*«»o%:S:“ l-faVnirg^o^Li^sion suggested that a return to pre 1975 hardcover levels would be appropriate. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as Planning Commissio on MondSy; irptlnbet 16, 1991: meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (473-7357). Tf vou desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission mlnuteSf they are available from the City Recorder after review an ^ppj^oval by the Planning Commission. 18V CITY OP ORONO P, O. Box 66 Crystal Bayr l 473-7357 ZONING FILE #1669 55323 NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Notice; 8/20/91 TOt" John w. Walker 1310 Spruce Place Nound» MN 55364-9626 COPIES TO: Dick Schieffer 730 East Lake St. Wayzata, MN 55391 type op APPLYCATICNI: Variance DATE OP NBBTYNGt 8/19/91 VOTE: 6 For 0 Against Plannliig Coaiiaaloii re(lends the following: Tabled for reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Tabled so that applicant can provide an alternate proposal for hardcover removals. Planning Commission suggested that a return to pre 1975 hardcover levels would be appropriate. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as Planning Commission on Monday^ September 16, 1991; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (473-7357). lY you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. Isv ■ - - Tos Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members Administrator Bernhardson 7. Proa:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Dates August 13r 1991 Subjects #1669 John W. Walker, 1310 Spruce Place - Variance Public Hearing Soolng District - LR-IB, Single family lakeshore residential, 1 acre, sewered Application - Request for hardcover variances to construct 2- story addition and deck addition Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 & 2 - No hardcover or structure allowed in 0-75' zone, maximum 25% hardcover allowed in 75-250' zone. Variances Requested 1.75-250' hardcover. Existing *= 50.61 Allowed = 25% Proposed « 32% 2.0-75' hardcover. Existing » 18.75% Allowed * 0% Proposed * 11.4% J^iplicant's Stated Hardships See attached sheets submitted by applicant. Exhibit D List of Bxhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K Application Plat Map Property Owners List Applicant's Hardship Statement Existing Site Plan Proposed Site Plan Existing & Proposed Hardcover Calculations Submitted Staff Review of Hardcover Elevation Views Proposed Floor Plans Building Inspector's Chronology Zoning File #1669 August 13r 1991 Page 2 DiscuBSicm This application has become an af ter-the-t a-, t request* because the applicant's builder started the proposed construction without building permits. As soon as this was discovered, the Inspections Department issued a Stop Work Order. Please review the chronology supplied by the Building Inspector. In effect, the applicant's builder contacted staff early in the process, and was advised of the permit requirements as well as the issues with hardcover. The builder then apparently decided that he could ultimately remove enough hardcover to meet City requirements, and proceeded to remove the roof of the house and construct the second story without a building permit. Staff believes that work occurred for about 2 weeks between the initial contact early in July and the posting of the Stop Work Order on July 30. Between one-third and one-half of the hardcover on the entire property is in rock landscape beds. Except for the 700 s.f. rock bed west of the driveway, which is lined with plastic, all the other rock beds have a non-woven fabric liner. The proposed house addition includes a 95 s.f. "squaring off of the northwest corner of the house where previously there was an uncovered deck. This corner and the rest of the house is intended to have a second story added, the superstructure for this already having been completed as noted above. Because of the hardcover excess, and the change of this corner from a platform to a more intense form of hardcover, a hardcover variance is required. Further, the decks proposed to be rebuilt oT>d added at the north and south ends also comprise a more tense hardcover than now exists. Since a portion of the .sting deck extends into the 0-75' zone, applicant has been aa ^ised and has agreed to rebuild it totally out of the 0-75' zone. The brick patio and all the landscaping and retaining walls were constructed at some time in the past without any City review. We have no information as to when these improvements occurred. Average setback is not an issue on this property since these additions sit behind the line of the house to the north, and on the south side this property abuts an unimproved street right-of- way. Zoning File #1669 August 13, 1991 Page 3 The "proposed" hardcover worksheets were submitted by the builder before the variance request was submitted. The homeowner and builder feel that reducing 75-250' hardcover to 25% would mean losing the patio, the deck, and portions of the drive. The applicant would like to expand the decks, and is prepared to reduce the driveway if ne^'essaiy but would prefer to not lose the patio. Bardcover Reaoval Options Any recommendation considered by Planning Commission should include removal of the 700 s.f. of plastic lined rock beds west of the driveway. Since the council put on hold its determination whether non-woven fabric is non-hardcover. Planning Commission could also recommend that all other rock beds upon the property have the fabric underliner removed. This leaves 11.4% in the 0- 75' zone if none of the sidewalks, retaining walls, deck, patio or shed are removed. Certainly the patio is the next most expendable area in the 0-75' zone to accomodate further reductions in that zone. In the 75-250' zone, removal of all the landscaping hardcover and addition of the expanded deck and upper story as proposed, results in 32% in :he 75-250' zone. Soce II equals 141 s.f., about 1000 additional s.f. would have to be removed to get to the 25% level. Removal of the 420 s.f, parking area next to the garage would lower it to 29%. Not much more of the driveway could be removed and still le'*ve it functional for backing out. If variances are denied, a buijding permit could not be issued until hardcover in the 75-250' zonr is reduced to 25% under a reasonable, functional scheme. This may not be possible. Planning Commission may also wish to consider whether, if applicant could reduce the 75-250' zone to 25%, should any portion of the 0-75' hardcover also be removed? The City Council has declared that all "illegal*’ hardcover in 0-75' zones must be removed . Issues to Consider 1.After-the-fact fee will be automatically charged fcr the building permit. Is there any justification to not charge an after-the-fact variance application fee? 2. If all plastic/fabric hardcover is sufficient hardship to justify a variance for removej , 32% is there hardcover in 75-250' zone? Zoning File #1669 August 13f 1991 Page 4 3.Are there additional areas of excessive hardcover that can reasonably be removed to more ' loseiy meet the 25% allowance? 4.Can 0-75' hardcover areas be reduced to compensate for the 75-250* additions? 5.Since existing deck is in poor condition (not treated lumber) and needs replacement, should it be rebuilt partially in 0-75' zone per existing dimensions and location? ndation Options Planning Commission should consider the following recommendation options: 1. Approval as proposed, remove all plastic/fabric hardcover on entire property. 2. Same, plus removal of portions of existing patio or driveway. 3. Partial approval, with .. -ditions (specify). 4.Denial. 5, 6. Other. Requirement of after-the-fact fee for zoning application {after-the-fact fee will be automatically charged for the building permit). lev CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION #1669Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 13 IQ Acl-6. Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 8 ^^ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. cm OF orm FifilANiE OFFICE 01 QEH 175. C CHECK Jl 175.0'. 07/23/ APPLICANT Name Phone (home) <77/-*7/V7 ______ ^ Phone (work ) ^7/- 7/ *7 / Address; t3;o City; Cpr^fjc> zipi OWNER (if different than applicant^ >v Phone (home)M C. r ; < € • ■ Address; < tS- _ _ Phone (work ) '^7^?- (o O Citv: 7^ Jt’u/•:(■)’ _ _ _Zip; V Date Property Acquired _(month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT OSB OF PROPERTY Present Zoning Dist.ric •Tnvnlty'4^-/6 Present Use of Property / •Residentialti^ •5r (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail; VARIANCES RBQOIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Lot Width Front X Hardcover Side Rear) Other ■ ..... • -JT'- t\ ^^Sicribe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations:- - - ^wtu^Tvmrnm nir nunSDAL PROPERTY COWDITIONS . ^ ^ , **Deacribe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:^_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ ___ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ IBQOUtBD SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 348-3271). ;’e-a .u.v..o.,inc.„a, hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8*i xll tor ToTO«aphic"survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8% xll ). Sketches or plans of floor 4 elevation ’ AS an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of #ny other persons you v»'.sh notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. Ih« Applicant and Prop.rty Own.r must iign this rcM-lMr that Tarlanc aoplleaticn 1. not co«.l.t. if th. abo^ ii^nmation has not been included. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 'b: K' n lir: r. A-" P H ■:V I SJ“a1?ncann!!f y aprees to provide all /«2«7/ta?? incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the informatio supplied is true and correct the best of his/her )cnowledge. J^licant‘8 Signature Cate OMHBRS pTgBATUBB The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date sutherized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building * 9 Office of this change prior to the meeting. I (9i I «JN OATI 07/21/n MTCN 005 PROP ADDR QNNER NAHE TAXPAYER KAHE/ADDR PROP AOOR QIMER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADOR OMCR NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR POOP AODR OMNER NAHC TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR M 07-117-25 A1 0051 01505 SPRUCE PL SANDRA L NUNEHAKER ORETT A SUSAN LARSON 1505 SPRUCE PL HOUND m 55564 50 06-117-25 52 0014 01200 SPRUCE PL P J A S J SCHUELLER PAUL J A SUSAN J SCHUELLER 1280 SPRUCE PL HOUND m 55564 50 00-117-25 52 0017 01510 SPRUCE PL JOHN H NALKER JOHN N HALKER 1510 SPRUCE PLACE HOUND m 55564 50 00-117-25 52 0020 01550 CHERRY PL 5UJSAN H SUHEY I.USAN H SUHEY 1550 CHERRY PL HOUND MN 55564 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INfORHATlON SYSTEM PROPERTY OmERS LIST 58 07-117-25 41 0052 01576 NORTH ARM DR HILL1AM E BOHEN HILLIAM E 80NEN 40 PARK LANE MPLS MN 55416 58 08-117-25 52 0015 01290 SPRUCE PL STATE LAND DEPT JEFFREY E PAGE b^Sl 1ST AVE S RICHFIELD MN 55425 58 08-117-25 52 0018 01518 SPRUCE PL PAJRICIA A GROETKEN PATRICIA A GROETKEN 1518 SPRUCE PLACE MOUND MN 55564 56 08-117-25 52 0024 01575 CHERRY PL DAVID CHADHICK ET AL SCOTT R A ELIZABETH 8 INGRAM 1575 CHERRY PL MOUND m 55564 REPMT NO. PI455401 PAGC 11 56 07-117-25 41 0078 01295 SPRUCE PL STATE LAND DEPT CITY OF ORONO CONVEYED 2/8/82 ST DEED 161147 58 08-117-25 52 0016 01500 SPRUCE PL F L ROACH ASA ROACH FRAFAC A SHIRLEY ROACH 1300 SPRUCE PLACE HOUND MN 55564 58 08-117-25 52 0014 01550 CHERRY PL SUSAN H SUHEY SUSAN H SUMEY 1550 CHERRY PL MOUriO MN 55564 TOTAL BATCH 005 OQOll CO I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HErt«PIN COUNTY OEPARTHENT OF PROPERTY TAMTION* TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEFIfela MMi II. e/^s'^ Addendum to land use application: John W. Walker, 1310 Spruce Place, Mound, MN 55364-9628 Hardship & Unusual Property conditions- This property consists of two platted lots which have been combined to create a single homesite. The lot is high bluff property abutting North Arm. The topography is steep slope down to the lake combined with gradual slope away from the lake The property owner found that the bluff migrates toward the lake, evidenced by surface cracks in the sod. A number of retaining walls had previously been installed to halt surface migration. Removal of such landscaping devices, while reducing hardcover, would increase the rate of migration, erosion, and eventually, increase the surface water flow. The second issue is the saving of numerous 70-80 foot oak trees on the site which provide heavy shade and retard grass and vegetation growth which increases surface water erosion. The use of small size landscaping rock to cover bare areas under the oaks is designed to retard soil erosion. The third issue is the configuration of the combined lots in a modified wedge shape which constrains the location, shape and form of all improvements. Sidewalks, landscaping rock, patio brick and other landscape elements are designed to carry surface water to sump or low areas or create sump areas while retarding erosion. The property abuts a 50 foot city street right-of-way (Grant Street for approximately 150 feet) which is not improved and K provides a sump area for surface water for the property and the neighborhood. The property owner has installed a catchment system for all roof top surface water drainage. This catchment system connects all downspouts to a six inch diameter perforated tubing. The tubing is looped down several feet below the surface and then rises, creating a storage basin from which surface water migrates into and is absorbed by the soil in much the same way as a drainfield absorbs sewer effluent. There is presently installed on the property approximately 250-300 feet of six inch perforated tubing, creating a storage basin for a substantial po'»'tion of roof top drainage. The property owner will remove landscaping cloth and plastic from landscaped areas, as necessary to meet city specifications and reduce hardcover as defined by the ordinance. yr CU4 /j .-f --5CC'r- —t-«r r-H^ h»o.5 ecv.:■ LENGTH iZ.I r < . 1, i . 9.0 y n,^;i il‘‘ • . t e « *.% X w « . • T ^ ^ rrw » ^ ^ J li «l 1 c. -4i- ‘^l \*. C. &«-*-*/£ WAV -f k W « 4 I ^ W i . I :. F.'* r’jT •'•s '”' "\ L'f* G"'^ A V - ' . \ >T*^A. . ^ /'/' / —: . -S-i^EWALK . #\ X / 7iT 5 6 //< O . r , S . r . ^ I ■• * •• % *, / r ^ * T T n ^w * 1 M I i L/ Deck .^- p- %^0 /.' • > Tr^ V .•> - n — \ w • r » r* *~ »j • r* • r* *- w • •** N' :i> F.Landscape AREAS L'NDE.RUMN BY PLASTIC ■■ SHEETING X ^ 8 ..? o 2/0 c " V w I 1^ « S . .= . >' S.r.*^ V S.F. G. Cthe .r t ' W I . ' - ■ w — ' • • “ • • I Tot AL Ff.cpe .rty A rea in Zcne (V^^, //"/ 7 -7025 r -o 11 « -». • r * / / z' An 7C>, g' ~n r . ' V '-'t' ' ' /?/ 7 -L ■/O '*«c ->: ijO /V. 7$ °'o J ^ t v» « :'> t£./-24Z- HARDCOVE?. C;.l:ULATIQNJ,^ORK$HEz;-V4 S£T3AC:< ZONE: (CIHC-E ONE Existing Harocovsp in Zone A. HoUSc X — LE.NGTH WIDTH /2-'X _. 97 X X X _ A (lAPAGt X r np!VPWAY X X _. S.F. ^ • r • S.F. S.F. S.F. e r i » S.F. S.F. n giwm^ 3 „ = i->^S.F. S^Mp^ 1^0 ^1IIN5\XS 1 F1 „ 3 = /a S.F. £. ?ATIO/ i.k i.3 Vto; y _ _ -S.F, e 1 AKinArnpc X -S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN ov Y ®S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING y S.F. X * --------------------------S.F. R. flTWPP 9ifip oIIXS.F. -------------------- Total H ardcove .r IN Zone - <^.70.^S.F. ^ Total Property A rea ’.N Zone - 0‘2S ’S.F. B A <57^5.S' 4 m 7c?a< X inn .. ■'% Sv ’TTlrr'Ti V>-(f tSuiU>if^ - /VL r*• % */-^ I. w ' ^ a*. ... - 7r-e.ro ‘HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSH^• • r—iOr T^B, ^.lO, 7A«»A AiU.7 WV SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) C-75'^f ^ ^ I \ 0 9^ ^ w ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ , >W ^ ^ w w >->«. ^ ^ Existing Hardcover ir: Zcne r.O’JSE lO o w • • Vj k I .M i:7*i :> r* 0 . C7-.*'z /O.-f • *I O .'•1 1 ' V-V ?c.s> ~j pCi.?. c % § A 5 • C/^ Z,14.*^7.4.3 r ' • r? ♦ ' # r',.' ^ */ 1,-. . -•U^VL. -/n , . D. &4-&r>hJU=^ ' (*U>*w J ^w V# %//. - . Ratio / A D eck Y# % r.Landscape - X AREAS UNDERLAIN 3Y ^ A< /•*/ PLASTIC" • ' • SHEETING X /✓r /C'4 ✓r X % #A Tn' rP C• O'rur:?• » 4 n«. r.3 <? I k w 4 . ; \ W /4 i -5' // 3^2 ? /C - k • /?ZO 700 7jo / / v/5 CTAL rHCPERTY Ar.CA If! :.CN£/•//4C (^ .G -3k y S. F / I • • >/ w • • •0'^ / > S,F. S • F c* r •»^ . r » v‘ o * r» .*■ ■L • r~ • C , c w t . • S • F • r ^ • I I : *S . r . . S.F. S.F. c • 4 • . I n ^ . r .B rr\7/55-nD fl. /^c X iCO »« •••• * *7 9HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET 7ST*trO* SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE CNS) G-/c' _::'J-:>C0 roO-:.CC3 Existing Hardcover - gC>^A. H ouse * LENGTH WIDTH S.F. 3. Garage . c. Driveway D. Sidewalk <S139 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S. r • S.F. S . r • S.F. =tt: CD ¥' k- >• fr kl''k . r': I-' 1.. i/ s: Vi ' r-Hi-- W-- W u Ih': ■t' /^,AAX3C€M»^ ~ / ^/O 0^7^ ’ (A<£A -lOZS- *£ '> Cpc/^TV^-^Cfc He. /V< CTAL.C15 P<i)PDJpt^ M<^ : Pc'A. 5utfi-^trr»^ f^otoesHe^ i 6>7/ s.f C K’CA'^i/fru OF SZO K^c^c/r^z-nc.^ . /CerA'»j/WG.. k^AvuC 08, •_ Z'.*^ C /C4V/x»;^ OF t>«c (c 2 6. ; ]) fCnPoUr'^ CfTP" C _ rf l,c. lpOCKy''/>^ ~77C. ; L 2.0 i.-' Cp-KnAyMtx^ w/cts (f^fvno TTtt^S^ C'he^CAi. -srm/6 *^4aj:,o.v ,aj oorO . /5l7 - 5zc 4-0. - e»oa -r = //.V AJot^ - /-t4- A^cii-BeOs 0~7S' /^e 4//>tfC> lAJf-rt-f /U9^'“>'o.Jot/p/'J . 1 /^-2^SO C AP-ef^ =!•-',;<-/c> .sX!)y ^ //C =• ST?-6* ^ /^t»*2 SvAf^^i-rrti^ Ci»l-CS. /tC ^.. . . (^ P'e>2- ::w6MrTTvti i .C .» 27.*?^ dHowrp /j^J'AgAztrz F>u>f^7B~) 'i to <^'tku/C4>0 liV' 2/2 ^ ey ;<Y : X, (f'i') Ctjpce .‘”’<’V»t/c«»‘> TO B^azT^ C/^A,nc> /fc /coctL /’i^rnc J^^'^vpOj C />y4-u:; c-rAn") - fC.i^tVjO\/F 700 ^72-0 ■*• / 37 7- i/. J^ccMjp^xryt. ~ l^ccitf ^/-4rnr r //OrC. AJif-r-- '7l^•7oo•y^o-^l^o ^//o s VSZS' ,\^. = i2.oy» pemr ■ cr ^7VP : X ^ 70O -':^.. /J. . .. IaJvTTU _/;>k2TC.^ __t^'rh A>OK> .(AioyJig^ . pA£rl»C- , ’.J r-r‘i’* • • • c li'r' I'SW. I<C)*<r»->(>Lo3.Y - /B/crs 1-b IrJO: 7-fS- '!Dc^C< _ 0/1 .-. pSAMi'l/: Se^ . Jd^ty'j *ifeX suA/e-^ o^vd -*c^po4AQkiT) /^£»e^_ il> '■Oa^^«cXA liZP^V ji ^ ka<-6<Pi/C*^ CCK. Sul^/UJ ^'C<L 7/S"-^ 7-:3£> C/AX^ ju.'/J .... <leci: ^eoe>nX UclAcc 'I 4iQmj> /pano«%' /#v ci;.iS. CAJ-^ 4 M|r ^ eip^Ux*^ed^ H ^luiL*e^ ^vii^tfirstfcKc^^ ^ntcc^Kc^ '^<eAAAKt.l\ ■'^ Ci>Cu^^ 'L ^ c[r^ ^ ?'Ok ^0^ ? d^Sc-us^ Vaf\^xuLcC / l^^jircL^i/er fe4MC>oalc_ ylo4^ ^A^Ou^li 'h> ^oicL \)Ciuflci4Ajc^ ^ \06' u^OulJr ^0^ iSSh^ “for liouse- WocOtu^ \JanoM c€' aee^e^ 4ir cWirT . . . SToP u>^)^ ’(ycu^^e^uf 'f'loc^Y"^ \rt>of fervUN To: / Chairman Kelley and Planning Commissicn yercers ^ Mayor Peterson and Citv Council Ron Moorse, Jity Adir.ir.is Fron: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building C Zoning AdministraOj^ c September 12, 1991 #1676 City cf Orono, 700 Old Crystal Bay Road - Conditional Use Fermiit - Continuation of Public Hearing *C Zoning District: RR-IB Pertinent Ordinances - A, Sec. ion 10.27, Subdivision 3 A - Public service structure setback required. Required = 50' Proposed = 50' (Note: 50' setback is maintained fron elevated bowl area at 70' diameter.) B. Section 10.75, Subdivisions 1 and 2 - Height of structures. Conditional use permit required if structure is greater than 45' in height. Allowed ® 30' Per Section 10.75, Subdivision 1 Allowed = 45' Per Section 10,75, Subdivision 2 Additional height request approved under this Section sed by City * 145' (Note: .Special setbacks are not required as a condition of increases in height, only a 50' setback applies per the above referenced Code Section.) Liat of Exhibits - A - Cook Report 9/12/91 B - Staff Letter to Cook 8/28/91 C - Certificate of Mailing - Re-notification D - Excerpt from Sewer and Water Agreement PUD-Otten E - Municipal Water Plan P - Elevation Discussion Please review Exhibits A and B. Cook has responded to concerns expressed by meir-<ers of the Planning Commission and the Design Committee for the new facility. Cook will be present for the 7:00 p.m. public hearing to respond to any questions of the public or members of the Planning Commission. Staff has enclosed an excerpt from the sewer and water agreement for the Otten PUD that would not allow installation of a municipal well on Outlot B. Outlot B is the outlot that contains the municipal well and pumphouse located in the northeast portion of the Otten's property. In consideration of the number of delays in reviewing this application, the conditional use permit for the municipal water tower application will be presented for Council action at their September 23, 1991 meeting. Zoning File #1676 September 18, 1991 Page 2 Additional CanuBents and Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission eliminated the torcspherica1 water tower design because of the safe'-y hazards associated with a ladder in the substructure design that would encourage the climbing of the tower. The interior access stairs of both the hydro pillar and pedestal designs were more suitable based on the proposed location adjacent to the school. The majority of the Planning Commission recommended approval of the hydro pillar design. Staff asked the members of the Planning Commission if the 50' setback should be determined from the base of the water tower (30' diameter) or from the basin (70* diameter). Cook advised that if the setback was to be made from the 70' diameter of the basin that this would place the water tower 10’ from the designated wetland and also require excavations of the designated wetlands to install the t wer. Cook was asked to provide a more detailed site plan locating designated wetland and proposed water tower site showing diameter of basin and base of water tower in relation to designated wetland. It should also be noted that in connection with the proposed antenna amendment to the Code that would allow the attaching of antennas to the proposed water tower, that the 50' setback may place limitations on the attaching of antennas to the water tower. As the leasing or permitting of these antennas will provide financial gain for the City, this issue should be researched further prior to final placement of tower on Citj- facility Lite. Note the enclosed resolution has been drafted such that the water tower must be placed at a minimum setback of 50' from the north property line. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted for Council's review and formal action. Isv A RBSOLOTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.27, SUBDIVISION 3 (A) AND 10.75, SUBDIVISIONS 1 AND 2 PILE #1676 NBBRBAS, the City of Orono, (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in the property located at 700 Old Crystal Bay Road North within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, City of Orono Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a conditional use permit per Municipal "oning Code Section 10.27, Subdivision 3 (A) that would allow an elevated tank or water tower requiring a minimum 50' setback from all lot lines and a conditional use permit per Section 10.75, Subdivisions 1 and 2 that would allow the elevated tower to exceed the allowed height of 30' and the additional length of 45' at a maximum height of approximately 145*. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning Pile #1676. 2. The property is located in the RR-IB Rural Residential Zoning District requiring 2 acres in area. The property consists of 14.11 acres. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on August 19, 1991 and September 16, 1991 and recommended approval of the conditional use permit based upon the following findings: Page 1 of 4 4. 5. C) The recent improveirt;it project for the City of Orono involving an expanded water system within the Highway 12 area is designed to keep the supply (well) and storage (tower) separated. This condition provides the greatest effici.ncy in providing fire flow to any area within the distribution system. The preferred location for the tower would be near Old Crystal Bay Road either on the north or south side of Highway 12. The property is located on the north side of Highway 12 adjacent to Old Crystal Bay Road. As property is owned by City, the City need not purchase additional lands in the preferred placement area thereby reducing overall costs of water tower Installation. The water tower will be located within a row of mature trees providing a natural screening/buffer ing of 50 to 60 feet of the base of the tower. The City has received no negative comments from the adjacent property owners most impacted by the installation of the tower. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the installation of an elevated water tank will not be be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the affect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the community. Page 2 of 4 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.27, Subdivision 3 (A) and Section 10.75, Subdivisions 1 and 2 to permit a 145* elevated water tank that will maintain a minimum setback of 50' from all property lines to be located at the property legally described ab^ve, subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised ty application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (September 23, 1992). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as 9 misdemeanor. The Mayor and City Council have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of the City of Orono, its successors and assigns, and hereby directs the Mayor and City Clerk to complete the execution of this resolution so that it may be filed in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 4 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 23rd day of September, 1991. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Petersen, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 23rd day of September, 1991 by Barbara A. Peterson 6 Dorothy M. Rallin, Mayor 6 City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 4 ll r U\i Bonestroo ^5 Rosene Anderlik & |\]| Associates Engineers & Architects September 12, 1991 Ji/ *! vf i* 4 ^ ^rjr *» -c:rr* C c *5 9 ^ •% * Vi*. •» - je* :« •? f ‘••r '£ • Cszt *f I Se>?J- »8 •c?e^ 3 5>e -‘CPA *.'jni A. -a-|C4-. •W < PS V*c*i? • ftwr-l-'A »£ j *5 C.IV4 c ^s<cti. n •»•-^JJ 4/ irtf-jcA. ->E a va?A-4 ■! <e--er p A.^crrar *5 \ y* 9 .*r*i »e *zzf^ Z * 4 -5-:: { »# ^ *5 r.-r . Uizrz* Vi e ^ 5ca *1 •* C . CiJr.ri P# i-;r Vjt^n •! Vi»e ^ .ta -i •£ •*c*»u I A'-ce-w- 4 C17 » ^ Anrr •! ‘.I -j t ,f ler. . •- *5 c*:*^ ' 't * • • Ac*f V J• c » .f-% 5 :*C e C .< >£ ?r:eA • r§ Cav a/ Vc.'<»< p| C3^ U A ec I" • '^sa p| CN-fJ A £ ct-^ ^SO V *ivATl«V ^yjr M 0*C* City of Orono Attention: Jeanne Mabusth Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: 139-1676 City Facilities Dear Jeanne: The City of Orono elevated water reservoir is proposed to be constructed east of Old Cr>'stal Bay Road on the north end of the City property. The reservoir could be moved to a»'oiher location, provided a suitable site can be obtained. The preferred location for the tower would be near Old Crystal Bay Road, either nonh or south of TH 12. The water system is designed to keep the supply (well) and storage (tower) separated. This ghes the greatest efficiency in providing fire flow to any area within the distribution system. The proposed elevated tower designs shown on the attached plan provide the most cost effective opuons. Whenever the designer varies signiflcantly from the options showu costs increase signiflcantly. (S1.25/gal. to Sl.50/gal) We can develop additional design options if desired by the City. The <2ity has the choice of either elevated or ground storage. The elevated tank would be approximately 145* high and the ground water reservoir would be approximately 60 ’ high. The types of storage seieaed depends on the desires of the Qty and the overall system economics. It is desirable to have some elevated storage on any water distributor system. The Orono system will have only one reservoir for a number of years so we would recommend that It be elevated. The operation and maintenance cost for the ground water storage system is generally higher than for elevated storage. The booster pumps necessary to get the water from the ground reservoir to the distributor system result in increased construction and operaUon costs. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Clenn R. Cook GRC:lk Attachment L, o o .V* 4 r. /;> i'v 1 . 0 \ \ CITY of ORON MiinidpBi Officts Post Office Boe 66 Cnsud Bay, .Minneou 5f3I3-OOho August 28, 1991 - Conditional Use Permit Glenn Cook Bonestrooy Rosene# Anderlik & Associates 2335 West Trunk Ewy. 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 RE: Application #1676 - City of Orono for Siting of Water "-ower Dear Glenn: The above referenced application has been rescheduled before the September 16, 1991 Planning Commission at 7:00 p.m. aSin asked to present thr* aopiication and respond to any questions members of the Planning Commission or the public may have. At both the Planning Commission and the meetings for the new facility, members raised the foil g S^stions that you should be prepared to respond to or to provide additional information; 1. Other available designs for water ^ customizing is a consideration, provide cos in comparison with standard designs available. 2. Pros and oona on a ground/vault storage system. Members■ found this approach most acceptable in light of the visual impact of the 140* high tower. 3. Review various options of access to relation to minimizing impact on site and additional . cost factors. telephone - 4TJ-T357 • FAX • 4TM)S10 V Glenn Cook August 28r 1991 Page 2 4.The original sewer and water agreements reviewed so that members of both the Design Committee Ind Planning Commission may view a would require that the water tower be placed “ w«st of the Otten property. =°'’<'«Ln’'r^-il«* will be submitted for Planning Commission revle . 5.It has been suggested that you review |”P®/y ^be within the area adjacent to Highway 12 that m y suitable for placement of tower. your place. Sincere lyr Jeanne A. Mabusth Building 4 Zoning Administrator eo! John Gerhardson, Acting City Administrator JAM/18V »• CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. ) CITY OF ORONO I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1676, was mailed to the attached list of property owners . In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 26th day of August, 1991. Jamie Bosma >r rwP u The City understands that the sewer and water ut^i^t*es should be installed and in operation by the *.all of 1990 in order that the Developer's building construction and occupancy can be ccnpleted on tine. To the ex^en^ uhat the City is delayed in installing sever and water it is hoped that the City would per it at least United occupancy of the buildings on the site so that the Developer's business can appropriately and properly coBunence sales in the fall of 1990. 3. Conveyance of Well Site; In consideration of the foregoing and in consideration of the further sum of $11,500, the Developer will deed to the City Outlot B, East Willow Woods for the test well and for the permanent municipal well site. Outlot B shall not be used as a wat:gr tower site. This restriction on tne use or Outlot 3 'sKaT^”surviv^^?He closing and conveyance of Outlot B to the City. The form of the deed is attached hereto as Exhibit E and will be delivered upon execution of this agreement and payment of the said sum. 4. Binding Effect; The terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and enure to the benefit of the heirs, representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. This agree.'nent r.ay be placed of record by either party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Developer have caused this agreement to be duly executed on the day and year first above written. 1 Presence ot; / -KJl nee of; / CITY OF ORONO V"- THERESA L NAAS HOI^ MUO • MINNESOTA mb^nepim COUN^^ Initials of Developer Initials of City clerk^S^^ Page 3 of 4 w* [■: .L. 'n:Chairman Kelley and Planning Coinmissicn Menbers Mayor Peterson and City Council City Administrator Moorse % i^rua: Date: Jeanne A, Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator September 10, 1991 Subjects #1677 Cedric Dettloff, 1255 Dickenson Street - Variances - Public Hearing % % Soiling District: RR-IB Required area - 2 acres or 67,120 s.f. Existing « .31 or 13,548 s.f. Pertinent Ordinance - 1.Section 10.28, Subd. 5 (B) - Front street setback variance required for proposed addition. Required * 50' Existing » 41' Proposed ■ 41* Variance « 9' or 15% 2.Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C) - Allowed lot coverage. Lot area ■ 13,548 s.f. Allowed lot coverage » 2032.2 s.f. or 15% Existing ■ 2956.51 s.f. or 21.8% *-1 Proposed = 2956.51 s.f. or 21.8% *-2 Application does not involve an increase in structural footprint coverage though an excessive amount of lot coverage exists, the proposed two story addition involves an intensification of that footprint coverage. *“1 Existing ■ 10' X 32' enclosed single story workshop area *-2 Proposed = 10* x 32' two story addition consisting of a grade level workshop and second story 3-season porch. Review Exhibit F and G. List of Bxhlblts A - Application A-1 - Applicant's Addendum B - Property 0%mers List C - Plat Map 0 - Applicant's Sketch E • Staff Sketch P - Floor : ■ ^ 6 - Elevat Zoning File #1677 September 10, 1991 Page 2 of 2 Description of Request Applicant proposes replacement cf an existing grade level workshop along the south side of the residence. The existing single story stru^-ture will be replaced with a two story structure consisting of a grade level workshop and 3~season porch at first level. Review Exhibits F and G. The proposed addition to the south side of the existing residence will be located 41' from the unimproved street right-of-way of Keene Avenue (60* width). The existing attached garage is located ,3' from the street lot line adjacent to Keene Avenue. The secondary structure identified as an existin'* house on the survey of 1961 is no longer used as a residence structure but serves as an accessory storage structure. Mr. Dettloff advises that all rental use ceased many yea;.*s ago. Review of Hardships Please review Exhibit A-1, applicant's addendum. Dettloff notes that following hardships; Mr. 1.Recent rains caused serious structural collapse of block walls within shed addition. General structural condition of the shop addition requires major structural repair/replacement. 2.Location of house on property prevents addition from meeting 50' street setback. The existing footprint of 10' x 32' will remain the same with the proposed addition. 4.Keene Avenue was platted at a 60' width serving one additional residence and is neither maintained by the City nor planned for a major upgrade/. Additional CoBBonts and Planning Reconnendatlon September 18, 1991 The Planning Commission unanimously voted approval of the variance application as proposed finding the hardships cited by applicant to be acceptable. In addition it was noted that although there is an excessive amount of lot coverage over the allowed 15%, lot coverage at 21.8% would be maintained with the replacement addition. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the approval recommendation of the Planning Commission. Isv A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 14 (C) AND SECTION 10.28, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) FILE #1677 WHEREAS, Cedric Dettloff (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 1255 Dickenson Street vithin the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as Lots 1 and 2, Block 15, Minnetonka Bluffs, Hennepin County, Minnesota" (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) and 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) that would allow the replacement of an existing single story addition with a two story addition measuring 10’ x 32' to the south side o^ the existing residence where excessive lot coverage exists a i 2,956.51 s.f. or 21.8% where only 15% lot coverage is allowed; ■'■.he proposed addition will be located at the same substandard setback of original workshop addition from the street at 41' where a 50' setback is normally required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1677. 2. The property is located in the RR-IB Rural Residential Zoning District requiring 2 acres in area. The property consists of 13,548 s.f. or .31 acres. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on September 16, 1991, and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings; A. The age of the structure and recent rains have caused serious structural collapse of block walls within the shed addition. General structural condition of the shop addition requires major structural repair/replacement. Page 1 of 4 B. Location of house on property prevents comp 1ete replacement addition from meeting 50' street setback. C. The existing footprint of 10' x 32' will remain the same with the proposed addition. D. Keene Avenue was platted at a 60' width serving one additional residence and is classified as an unimproved road not maintained by the City nor planned for a major upgrade. E. The property is connected to municipal sewer. P. The attached garage addition is located .3' from the street lor line adjacent to Keene Avenue, 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City, 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. COHCLOSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grant! variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) and 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the construction of a 10' x 32' addition to the south side of the existing residence requiring approval of a lot coverage variance at 2,956.51 s.f. or 21.8% and a street setback variance of 9* or 18%, subject to the following conditions; Page 2 of 4 1. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance approval will expire on that date (September 23, 1992). 2. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 3. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of September, 1991. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Cleric Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. tJNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 23rd day of September, 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson 6 Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk o: the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the city. Notary Public Page 3 of 4 r 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199 Ka£o]T6 w© a Notary Public within and for said county# personally Speared to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument# and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUiwi OP HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199 . before me a Notary .ublic within and for said County# personally appeared known to me to be the person!8) described in and w'ho executed the forogoing instrument# and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 4 of 4 r- i' i::. / 'L #1 //■ C1T£ OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION^ S.Initial Application Fee S1T5.3C ($50.00 per each additional va Renewal Variance Fee SlOO.c: (no change from original application,- After-the-Fact Fees (Double ap licaticn rse PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address_ _j7^^ ^ 0 I c, IX'h $ C Tj . »* ) N ^Hire • - *u C * .» >> k V . X. . ■ X k I iw k.T * *r w ^ ' .i U i- : -■;< «.u X . ‘-r A,- a » w' • V • 'P t“ ' A ' W* • w* \ . 1. Uf • .4 .W a • • • • • 0 ■ Prooerty Identification Number (P.I.D.) O U 7 3/ 0<^^7 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Phone (home) ~~ C* 7 ^ ^ Name ^ i c O^LiTUfP' Address: IJ-S'.C Dfc,lrAn S^fn S S2T,7 ONNER (if different than applicant) Name ___________________ Phone (home) Phone (work) Describe request in detail: REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other _ _ _ ___ _ _ Lot Width Front ___ Hardcover Side _____ Rear) hardship Describe undue hardship cr practical cifficulty resul enforcement of zoning regulations:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ tine rrc - 31 r 1 DESCRIPTION OP ONDSDAL PROPERTY CONDITTONS Describe unusual property conditicr.s preventing ccr’pliance with Zoning Code Requirements:^_ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application_rcm eSftified Property Cwn'ers List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Gevt Center 348-3271). Map (obtained with p^'operty owners list),^. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Certificate oT survey Tsigned by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8*«"xll" for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8i«"xll"). Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8ii"xil'*). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other perso .s you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that yoor variapgg application is not complete if the above informa-tlon has not been included^ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff ^Ijne not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s Signature " 9/ ONNBRS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. 9/Owner's Signature ^ _ _ _ Date (3 Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled nyiew SMetings of the Planning Cosiission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 4..- A... AA y h t J S h t F *« T / J J ■ / -■-I * y 7^ / i" / (f T / h 2 J f c (■< '■ f ^ ^ ^ ^^ /"g"/ K7 //? 5 7^64 c- n f'y f~c ^ ^ ^ / c J • 'fh) ^ r d / h ^ ^ J F-<^ 'o ^/c c F u d /! c -f c o/-apJ^ F 9 // ft?T^ tTiY Sh^f=^ 73 rc*^^ "T' 5//// <=/,5/77 a 9'<:2-* f?^r?ccat/c h 3nJ F^ra^iFs Tc <i c t?<^ • hou^e Cc'h^rc^ // / J' /.r r 5 ^fec/ At c^ f^C ^tT2 /"/' 7^/ s Cl^wth C u^ <5 /' / ^ t7 c ^ /The. Fe ^ c c y?; r^f=^9 u- ^ t? <i ^diiTich L^'i// f?e 3 fcLc FT; be/ p rr S^ nTc cd<^y /c? ^F'C'^ Th<r Jn^. e S' py cbifhlY Fio^^Tct^n f<r^t To efes^Ta /he s'ir<rrT *T~hie Bl.^^ /h e:^ Ci e sTi (T n / s ^p/hoir'f7'7^ ie j t-f fcf^/y or From fh^ s'Tt^^ F ^hJ /T sheu/j f,'fTy FT 'Fh-^ i er^jr Bhd ^JJTt/cO Tc Jcfre Co F e The fS 3TeJ• BmccsiK^ ho m<rte Ffrcuv<i a re ^ ^ ifh Th i s a i~/c> F Thz 3 /7 ZP L/^ Bs ../><£? Fo /~h^ /h e A^in a. ^e-. • TT \/€.fue^t~ </cccir CcrtSid^i^-3f/i!^t? f ^ proF le^t?y0 Th c u ^ ye / a ^Js T~o A73 V r NUN MTI ON/lS/n Nfr#NPIN COUNTY PROPCNTY IHFONMATION SYSTCH PROPERTY C»t€RS LIST NATCH NON PROP AOOR ONNiR NAME TAXPAYER NAMC/AOOR OWEN MNE TAXPAYER NME/AOOR PROP AOOR OMNER NAKE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR SO 0E-117-ES SI DONE OlESO OXCKENSON ST EONARO H NAm EDNARO H NAm NOS ST PETER ST ST PAUL ftl S5102 SO 0E-117-2S SI 0027 01255 DICKENSON ST H J OETTLOFF ETAl HARION J DETTLOFF 1255 DICKENSON ST NAY2ATA MN 553N1 SO 02-117-25 SI OOSN OOOSS ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO T A A 0 A FISCHER THEODORE A GERTRUDE FISCHER 20SN COmERCE NLVD m 55SNN S8 02-117-23 31 0037 00530 HANLON AVE HAL THIES BILL A LUCY THIES 530 HANLON AVE HAYZATA HN 55391 SO 02-117-2S SI 0039 01295 DICKENSON ST N r SCNKXOT A K H SCHMIDT NXLLIAH A KARRINE SCHMIDT 1295 DICKENSON ST MAYZATA m 55391 30 02-117-23 31 00N2 00560 KEENE AVE NALKER MOTORS INC SEARS IMPORTED AUTOS INC 13500 HAYZATA NLVD HINNETOMCA m 553N1 PROP AOOR OmER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR SO 02-117-2S SI OONO 01225 DICKENSON ST N N YOUND TRUSTEE H/L EST BASIL H YOUNG 1220 DICKENSON ST HAYZATA m 55S91 TOTAL BATCH OON 00010 REPORT NO. PIN35N01 PAGE 11 30 02-117-23 31 0020 00539 KEENE AVE 0 MARALD ERIKSEN 0 NARALD ERIKSEN 6219 ZEALAND AVE N MPLS HN 55N28 30 02-ll7<23 31 0030 00520 HANLON AVE RAMONA M SLEOZ GERHARD D TANGER 10063 PILLSRURY AVE BLOOMINGTON m 5S620 50 02-117-23 31 0067 00650 ORONO ORCHARD RO S EDMARD H HAm EDHARO H HAm 600 ST PETER ST ST PAUL m 55102 / 'S’-y. J I c I ai^i i) •• V I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE ^ORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPAR^tt^ OF PROPER T^TIQNj^ TO T^jf)^EST OF MY KNONLEDGE AND BELIEF 5 // /U 'y 3 / (47) 1 m z. 6 f a n«c« •5 a t «Xlg '■“« \LOT 15 BLOCK I? Ul^tCTGNCA bluffs Ml VI DICKENSON * ^ 24 7^ n (12): (4) * £U '•'ti /•••; i N f Uli Fi m w 1 K n M .Sn ( 10):^1 ** ‘i L_ (9J i " fs HSff «r.7s II U S| 1/7 L trfi* f(26)W ” 'ai4 . (1?) 1 * r,”•' v( U) • s f ^ 1 II >_ ^ X ®| B ^ '" (46) f' 4^ 9 : J ^(15) : *1 fl If f ^ II 1 '*tnj ^ » fl B "* (22)* J(I&) ' ' (21)(I’ri ' ’ (20)N «• 1 1 “ ^19)• " § 11^ «> *' Jin n 1 FTni"7"F1 fL(») i ^ * i(27) • }^\ r t£) »l ■ r t“» 1 m U '1 1f (14) ^3ftt. i r (fi) ** (Xl^ kr •' L fiiL ^ : T ¥ r.. I V >• . » I V:* FOK v‘. i. '■Jr. > *I v'.‘ * ‘i ?la*. cf •j cf Lets : * *• o* ^.•« ww V/ - ^a '■2 ?' ='-.-> ^ ^ v»i„^<,*- •« M-^ a *»-»^« A ^« W Vi« %«,• • w * ^ » ^ « %.. J w ^ •4 T*• •«y?* ■n ;:*.lfr3 ^'v o Dickcmson o T,o ># K \ 1 \ 1/ \ o <T> .vO >0 rn k x; t\\ ' ZT <o f. t cr r- ■c> ; f r ' ^ r.r? c N i li \ 5^ z„ o 'WPI ^»C ^7 *0 ;«Z l*Ln Proa: Date: Mayor Petersen anc. City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Matjsth, .Building & Zoning Adminis'rator September 19, 1991 % & Subject: #1678 Paul and Marcia Meric, 2142 Shadyv/cod Road - Variance - Resolution Sonlng District: LR-IC Total Lot Area *= 26,245 s.f. [Required « 21,780 s.f.] Pertinent Ordinance - A. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover within 75 to 250 setback area Area within 75 to 250 setback area = 16,530 s.f. Allowed ■ 4,132.5 s.f. or 25% Existing ■ 8,380 s.f. or 50.7% Proposed Planning Commission's meeting of September 16, 1991 * 6,768 s.f. or 40.9% Total Reduction “ 1.612 s.f. or 9.7% Proposed per Planning Commission's recommendation (ext. N) - 5,529 s.f, or 33.4%* Total Reduction “ 2,851 s.f. or 17.24% Proposed hardcover per applicant's request (ext. 0) = 5.534 s.f. or 33.4%** Total Reduction * 2,846 s.f, or 17.21% ^Planning Commission conditioned approval on the removal of the middle drive and the installing of a backout apron along the east side of the existing residence [to the edge of the first concrete retaining wall]. [Review Exhibits N 1 through 2). In addition Planning Commission members unanimously agreed that the 162 s.f. of concrete spillway serving a public drainage way be removed from the hardcover calculations against this property resulting in a 1% decrease. Total reduction noted above includes the 162 s.f. **The Merlos reviewed the impact of the amended site plan per Planning Commissions recommendation noting the following concerns. The apron will be dangerously close to the severe drop in elevation at 8'. [Review Exhibit N 1 and P]. They also ask Council to consider the photographs and the location of a tree within the area of the proposed apron. Installing the apron at the proposed location would result in the loss of the much needed tree on the property. Note applicant's proposal providing a limited turnaround would result in almost the exact same amount of hardcover. Once again the 162 s.f. for the spillway has been included in the exclusion from the hardcover. %% '* Zoning File #1678 September 19, 1991 Page 2 B.Section 10.03, Subdivision 14(C) Lot Coverage Total area ® 26,245 s.f. Allowed Coverage = 3,936.75 s.f. or 15% Proposed ■ 2,090 s.f. or 7.9% No Variance Required List Of Exhibits - A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Adjacent Property Owners Acknowledgment Form E - Description of Request F ** Hardship Statement G - Applicant’s Sketch/Survey H - Staff's Sketch/Survey I - Elevation J - 1 through 3 Hardcover Fact Sheets K - Plan of Current Hardcover - 1 through 3 Proposed Hardcover Fact Sheets - Plan of Proposed Hardcover - 1 through 2 Amended Plan Per Planning Commission Recommendation Plus Hardcover Fact Sheet 0-1 through 2 Amended Plan Per Applicant's Request Plus Hardcover Fact Sheet P - Photographs of Street Yard L M N Description of Reqfuest Please refer to applicant's submittal Exhibit E. Briefly, applicant proposes a two story 22x24' addition to the east side of the existing residence. The lower level will be a two car garage, the upper level a bedroom with full bath. The improvement also involves a second level 8x23* deck to the lakeside of the existing residence. 20' of the existing 4 1/2' wide deck will remain to provide access via a stair case at the northwest corner of the house. Review Exhibits G or H. The proposed addition that involves an extension of the lakeside of the house will not encroach in front of the average lakeshore setback line nor will it encroach a 75' setback line. The applicant proposes major removal of nonessential concrete and bituminous hardcover. The application as proposed involves an overall reduction of 9.7% hardcover within the 75 to 250 setback area. Please note the only variances required for this i' provement would be the approval of a hardcover variance withir the 75 to 250 setback area. Zoning File #1678 September 19, 1991 Page 3 Hardship Statenent Please review Exhibit F, applicant's hardship statement. In reviewing item 2 applicant has amended proposal to remove the access drive at the south side of the property. The hardcover remaining is for the spillway that enters from the County drainage ditch to the lake. It should be noted that applicant's property receives drainage from the south side of 19 and along the north side of 19. The catch basin to the immediate southeast of the property funnels to the drainage ditch on applicant's property. Applicant has reduced hardcover within the 250 to 500' setback area from 39.6% to 21.3%. In regard to item 5, applicant has advised staff that invalid parents will be living within their residence and that the ability to access the property through the existing turnaround to the upper level front door is needed to facilitate access to and from residence. Access to the upper level may be often blocked by cars parked along the northerly access drive of the turnaround by a neighbor to immediate north. Applicant has asked to be scheduled at the Counci meeting of September 23rd as ^he entire heating system within the residence has been removed and there is an immediate need to install the new heating system while the contractor is available and before the colder weather sets in. Additional CoBaent and Planning Comsd.88ion Recoanendation The Planning Commission concurred that additional hardcover removal (greater than proposed 1,612 s.f. or 9.7%) was necessary in light of the impact of the existing bituminous paving on this property. Members concurred that the middle drive could be removed and still provide applicant with access to the upper level of the residence if an apron were provided along the east side of the existing residence. Members also advised applicant that in recalculating the hardcover facts that they did not believe it was fair to include the 162 s.f. for the concrete spillway serving the public drainage way. It was Planning Commission's hope that the amended site plan would result in the final hardcover somewhere in the lower 30's. The Planning Commission's recommendation results in 33.4% final hardcover - over original at 50.7% Zoning File #1678 September 19r 1991 Page 4 The applicant was concerned with the impact on the property if the directives of the Planning Commission were followed and asked the Council to consider their preferred option. Exhibits o - 1 through 2. Applicant would still retain ability to access the upper level and turn around to connect to the main drive leading to and from property. Installation of the apron would result in the loss of a tree and increase the potential for accident by moving a backout apron so close to the 8' drop in elevation. Hardcover fact sheets shows the same amount of hardcover reduction at 33.4%. In light of the pressures upon applicant to commence construction because of the time of year and the lack of a heating system within the structure^ staff has drafted an approval resolution based on applicant's amended proposal. If meters feel the Planning Commission's recommendations option is more appropriate, the resolution can be easily amended to include the removal of the middle drive and the installation of the apron. A member of the Planning Commission may be present in the audience to comment on applicant's 2unended proposal. .. r A RSSOLOTIOM GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MDNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 PILE 11678 WHEREAS# Paul and Marcia Merlo (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 2142 Shadywood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Refer to Exhibit A# attached. WHEREAS# the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit the construction of a 22' x 24' addition to the east side of the existing residence and a second level deck at approximately 8* x 23' to the lakeside of the existing residence, a hardcover variance within the 75-250' setback area is required as there exists 8,380 s.f. or 50.7% of existing hardcover improvements where only 25% is allowed, applicant proposes removal of 2,846 s.f. of existing hardcover resulting in 5,534 s.f. or 33.4% of hardcover. HOW# THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1678. 2. The property is located in the LR-lC Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 21,780 s.f. or .5 acre in area. The property consists of 26,245 s.f. or .6 acres. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on September 16, 1991, and recommended approval of an amended variance proposal bo«ed upon the following findings: Page 1 of 6 K "I. r. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of September, 1991. ATTEST X Dorothy M. Hallin, City clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property 0%mer(8) STATE OP MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN } The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 23rd day of September, 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson 6 Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 6 mfcJUai ■ r &':■ \ ^1- STATE OP MINNESOTA t ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On thla day of 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. STATE OP MINNESOTA ) )S8. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Notary Public On this day of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 5 of 6 r 4. 5. A) The property currently has 3 driveways. The most western drive is a s*'ared drive with the neighboring property on the west side and is the only access to the property to the west. B) Based on the location of mature trees in the street yard and the drop in elevation to the east side of home of 8', a limited turnaround portion of the middle drive has been retained to provide safe access from site. C) Applicant has reduced hardcover within the 250- 500' setback area from 39.6% to 21.3%. D) Applicant has reduced hardcover within the 75-250' setback area from 8,380 s.f. or 50.7% to 5,534 s.f. or 33.4%. E) The property contains a concrete spillway that serves a watershed located on the north and south side of Shadywood Road. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is neces iry to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the after-the-fact variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 2 of 6 CONCLOSIONS, ORDER AMD CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above# the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit the construction of a 22' X 24' two story addition and a lakeside deck granting a hardcover variance within the 75-250' setback area resulting in a total reduction of 2,846 s.f, or 17.21% with total hardcover at 33.4%, subject to the following conditions; 1. All Hardcover scheduled for removal is shown on the site plan included in this resolution as Page 6. All hardcover scheduled for removal shall be completed prior to the footing inspection for the new structural addition. 2. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (September 23, 1992). 3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 6 mK'--‘ » • i! m • ^ Page 6 of 6 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION; Lot 21 and that part of Lot 20 which lies Northwesterly of a line drawn from the rear line to the shoreline of said lot and midway between the sidelines of said lot, all in Block 1, "Wiley's Park", Lake Minnetonka and also that part of Lot 22, Block 1, "Wiley's Park" Lake Minnetonka lying Southeasterly of a line drawn Northeasterly from a point on the Southwesterly line of said lot distant 14.25 feet Northwesterly of the most Southerly corner of said lot, through a point distant 12.5 feet Northwesterly of the Southeasterly line of said lot measured along a line drawn from a point on said Southeasterly line distant 273,5 feet Northeasterly of said Southerly corner to a point on the Northwest?, 'y line of said lot distant 271.8 feet northeasterly of most westerly corner of said lot, according to the Recorded Plat there'll, Hennepin County, Minnesota. HARDSBIP Describe ur.cue hardship or practical difficulty rcsultir.a frcr. strict enforcement of zor.ir.c reculaticr.s : ^ C-Z?_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DESCRIPTION OP UNDSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditicr.s preventive ccrpliance wirh Zoning Code Requirements:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS !• Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners list of owners within -50' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%"xll” for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevaticns) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8i;"xll"). Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8J?"xil"). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above on has not been included. /2. 3. ^0 4. 5. 6. 7. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or ^•quested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and »:ertifies that the information supplied is true and correct to^thU) best of J^i^/her )cnowledge. Applicant's Signature cate O—Eng SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges an,, agrees to this application and further Authorires reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, •gents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of thisxequest. Owner's Signature Date ^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled rawiew meetings of the Planning Comisalon and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. HUN DATE 07/31/n MICH OOS raop ADOf< OliCR NAME TAXPAYCR NAHE/AODR SR 17*117-ES SI OOAR 0S5M TOGO RD DAN SIERS OAHlEi A NARGARET SIERS S600 TOGO ROAD HAYZATA m 55S91 PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AODR S6 17-117-2S A2 0011 0214A SHADYKOOO RO A N A R F HENSON JR ROBERT F HENSON JR 2144 SNAOYHOOO ROAD NAYZATA HN 55S91 PROP ADDR OIMR NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR SB 17-117-2S 42 0020 021S0 SNAOYHOOO RD DONALD r HAGEN DONALD F HAGEN 1014 EXCELSIOR AVE HOPKINS rtl 55S4S PROP ADDR OmER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR SB 17-117-2S 4S 0136 02177 SHAOYHOOO RD MARK A SHEPHARD HARK A SHEPHARD 2177 SNAOYNOOD RP HAYZATA m 55S91 HEfiCPlN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 0»#CRS LIST REPORT NO. PI4S5401 PAGE 11 SB 17-117-23 42 0009 0217B SHADYHOOD RD CAS ANDERSON CURTIS ANDERSON 2178 SHADYHOOD ROAD HAYZATA HN S539I SB 17-117-2S 42 0010 02172 SHADYHOOD RO N H A G R HELCH NORMAN H HELCH 2172 SHADY HOOD RD HAYZATA m 55391 5® 17-117-21 ^2 0012 021<^2 SHAOYHOOO RO I SCHOEN (DA SCHOEN IRVING t DORIS A SCHOEN 21<i2 SHADYHOOD RO HAYZATA m 55391 56 17-117-23 92 0015 02159 SHAOYHOOO RO JEROME J LAGUE ( HIFE JEROME J LAGUE 2156 SHADY HOOO RD HAYZATA HN 55591 SB 17-117-2S 42 0021 03601 TOGO RD THOMAS L SNYDER THOMAS L SNYDER 5705 HOOO DUCK CIR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 3B 17-117-25 42 0022 02171 SHADYHOOD RD JACIKIEIYN A ROBERTSON JACQUELYN A ROBERTSON 2171 SHAOYHOOO ROAD HAYZATA m 55S91 CD 59 17-117-25 95 0157 02169 SHADYHOOD RO SCOTr A EATON SCOTT A EATON 2169 SHADYHOOD RD HAYZATA m 55591 TOTAL BATCH 005 OOc^l I CERTI'Y THAT THE TACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HE(64£PIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF MY KN0HLED6E AND BELIEF. OAT' n i i %* 41 i i i 7 ^ rjJ[T*5 hom ^OP aCA'!W y tipT y (x:^ 4^ I •'€ cw*^!» OP wO^ « » 'TT HTSC »C TV •«• cairr ^I»X Adjacent Proper-c I (we)P^6V\g-xf 1". I't \ i j' i — ■—' Jy Owners' Acxncwledgemer.t Fora t ^ ih\ O ' iiireks ] D O - ^ /' ■ prir.-[print name(s)i Have reviewed rde pie- 1^'e property located a--- Application No - tin(^«i-s*a"''^ ^ha- in executing this acxncw 1 edgement , - (we) am X (we; ^ acorcval or disacoroval c: the property or use (are) not as)ted tv cou-c'i'that : iwe) an (are) aware of but merely to ^'^'^t't'he troc'osed neighbor's project or usethe improvement plans and unat cue . requires Council approval. ^AAe---- Property Owner (2aa- H'V- Date V-A// Property Owner Date I (we) M*********************************** J t=L(?_gxV^<S. —^ --------- Q (print name(s) of -Z\X^'y .yhi • [print address] have reviewed the property located at ............................. Application No I (we) unuerstand that in !.^rp"r%VrtVor u» (are) not asJced to declare-approva or ^ aware of but merely to confirm ^ ,{ neiohbor's project or use the improvement plans and that >-..e . requires Council approval. k* /.? /?/■ Date ‘7/ Date .“'.."“".I Lik s.P;iji A; M.iri.1.1 Mcrl ' 2142 ShaJv'^^ood Ro.iJ (Drv'no. NIN 55.''M DESCRIPriON OF RFOI FST The house as it exists today has two hedroonis. one and one hall baths in the li\ine area, and a sinale car. tuck-under garage. The house needs to be expanded to accomodate my ite and myself, one of three daughters who is in college, and mx inxalid parents who will be living with us for six months, including the summer months, each yea; Our plan is to add sufficient living space while at the .same time reduce the total amount of hardcover on the property by over twenty two hundred and sixty square leet W e plan to add another bedroom and full bath over an att;iched two car garage on the si)uth side ot the house where the concrete pad is today In addition, w'e plan to e.xiend part ot t.he existing tejr toot wade deck on the front of the house another eight leet toward the tront. We will be removing all non-essential concrete and asphalt hardcover from the property. The concrete pad on the south side which was installed for storage of construction equipment when the house was built in 1*420 will be reduced by six leet. The asphalt drive on the sx)uth side wall be narrowed from an average of fifteen teet wide down to ten teet. Tlte existing concrete pad along the front of the house will be eliminated. The planned st.iirway tor the deck has also been eliminated. r.iul ..V M.irci.i Ntcrl-' 2142 Sh.iduu'u'd Rv'.iJ Orono. NIN 55,'‘>1 i^!2i-4~i-s;.n4 HARDSHIPS 3 4 The drivewav to the north is shared with our neighhors. This is their only access to Shadywood Road. The driveway to the south is the only drainage tor lOiH) feet ot Shad\"wood Road north of the property. The first eight feet of this driveway drops down live feet. It cannot be used to exit the property in the winter due to icing and the blind curve on Shadywood Road to the south. The concrete spillway is required to prevent overflow it ' .aier onto both properties The ground slope from north to south drops very ab-uptly. A turnaround is required to avoid having to back up over 200 feet uphill, around a curve. Removal of a portion of the circular driveway to the north would tv)ice a driver to liack up into the neighbors driveway in order to exit from the house. If that drive were blocked by another vehicle or if the neighbors objected to l.eir diivcway being used in this manner. .i driver would be forced to drive in reverse for one hundred * :;et around a two hundred tw'eniv five decree curve. Ihis would be extremelv difticuh Jo i.' mg the day and not feasible at night. The house has onlv a one car tuck-under carace. /= ll: < •I (S’ £* s > ^ • • «» 5 - i -- - A/(Z'St4QCtLS' I No 0^5 f' 'm t S > \ V ^ >\ fc" • C^(UU*'T HAHDCGVE?. c.;l-JLat :c.‘i wc?.:<s:-;e--rs£"3Ac:< IONS: (c:?.c-£ CN=’ ■-■ E-xisting Hardcover :n Zcne ^ ^ t—r '•-» A. House length X w:;th ^ m ^ ^ f Si?* 7-'^# 9“-/ X •j. r t X S.F. X _ .,0«r • X S. . 3. Garage _ X c. Driveway X s;f. S.F. *• ?^ • r • :> • r Ut — X S S.F. X s • r • '’at 10/ JEC.K X S.F. e.laMnsr^pp X • AREAS ft UNOEHLAIN BV X • • • • S.F. PLASTIC • SHEETING X S _ S«r» X S.F. j-/*/uu^r a. Htups X /S”.F. Total HARocnvER in Z one 7r S.F. Total Property Area in ZONF ^ ^ €~5 • s.^. 4 4 a ^ ^ ^ S> V inn - oy i kH pI" s¥ IfeLiJi- I k ' *A i • r ^ ' r>*f.1 ''^cC C^'a«. I pLVj •' Cu/UL^^ SST3A HARDCOVER CALC.'LAT! *. c;< Z3r(t: (CMCLE ;•.£.. . , w * ^ ^ E.csti *’’ Hardcover , in Zc:.£ » 1 ..:us= ^i.-is .?S. ?2: LENGTH W IL I.t / is .■}-. s... X 3 ,.r.• J__ X _ 0 X /. 0 ^ 0 s p. X LS fOKS a. C ahaci ;<ns<^.z C.DrI . AY X L. • • • • • S/70 3,;. X . • r p • <L^J>C • "•rAiJi*- - :j. 4 rOfiWMH* _ 6 X <f. 6 S.F. ui^> --/rAMis v.o X 1.^■-?-? 5 S.F. X 3 - S.F. C.Jatio /D cck X • m m .S.F. » Landscape x •S.F, AX CAS UNOCCLAIN tv ;<m • s.r. ELASTIC S«<eCTING X • S F. X S.F. n Otmc • ' • * X /. o .S.F. % Total Harocovcr in Zone fils. s.'. T otal Piio^wty Aaia in ZoHt /c r>« , A ,s m /-yyp .^m •< ICO -S:?. 7o_ % T- iiiiii-hih" I I: 'CUjt^'T HARDCOVE?. CALC ’JLATICN ■•<C/k ::-ee" Ss"3Ac:< :oNc: (;:scL£ c.-is' -- : '- Existing HAacccvsa in Itne Z " * Ho'js- . Gar AG c c. Driveway 3. Sidewalk I. Patio/ Deck p.Landscape A«fAS UNOtALAIN lY POSTIC SKlfTtNQ G. Other LxNGTH :< X :< :< :< X :< X X X X :< »T . w Total Karocover in l3«e j • r » i . r , f • c r • /2 /C?j • I*. S. r. S.f=. S. S.A. m ^ Ci • • S.F. S.F. S.F. s ~. » • • • 5. ? /2/<? Total Paopwty A pia :h Iohe JaSo s.?. 7-y .--I ^ ' 3 S /2/0 J] JaSO X icq - , r tx •klS: K ^ y I ^ iffi ,ij:^ y*^7 % C€»»€l^ “T CT 7 7^ ip" Nte- 6i is m-s.;p- ¥' I'-- !i-0-.W' i'f#;. ^Sl: ;:SK :"3 = ssi- ■-iS’S : Si| •|i-m » HAi^CQVE.*. ;*AL'-’JLAi kC ssrsACx iCNg: (crac:^ one ) (o^j^ 7:-!:’- Ex 1ST IMG KAancavES :n Zone ^ ^ w A. H ouse I. Gaeage c. D eive -way 0. SiorwALX Satio/Diex p.UnsiCA^t AMAf |0lOtlll>IN lY^MTie SNOTIlia C0d^, rMc^r i. Otnbi « X S,F. Li:<GTH wisrn ‘ X .•s ■ ^ • X «S.F. •X _ • . S.F. X __ai S#r# X •... V«r. X S.F. X s »• •S.F. X 9 S.F.- X 9 S.F. S,A. S.E. S.A. _ S.A. _ f.?. S.A. / • « M • S.A. Total Hmbcovoii in Zone - Total tavorv A ma in Zone ys A0 - S.A, fT) t.A s X 100 7-' S i/ :_ __ fiirL'''Lat^ Hinnck^pjtc^<^ --.i:-.:::’/!?. i;l:’:’--:::*! ___ qhisis£-i/ic;< i:ns : .::.-.::«i ............................... ^ ^-iisTtNC -iA^rcr'i- :.N ••V* *«rI ^ d «• M-diiHo n CcrKlS^<^^^ 1, ^ipn^^rt C. D rivshay C^cSHi irs :< S'"'- a. lOoad S^irs •^^: /pATtO/ ^ DiCX '■r- ^ 4* R. UnOSCARf ARIA!unocitu^<*N •Y SMtITINa Cgnc^ c. Qmm^ 44. aS" '^■iaT:-i o 30 21 X X X X 35.3.. /•O' /•3 /•o (/- (0 7.S -f- I-a Ss-t m i . - ^5 ? S« • » 7 . S /A-6 i . r . .3^♦ • s..-. S.i=. 39J-- S--* 3^.5"S.r . /84 s.R.». .•". • S.r .* ^ /^' ; j « f . £T*» A , ♦ ^ ♦ S.R. fr^ *' > ■*‘ " 0 l.R . S.R. /6A S.R. “Total SiARCcsvut im Is«f Total ?nepfxre A ria in Zoni AI /(• S30 iti.21 3 I /t,S30 * 15D • __%*'-----Jo.^ I: r< y t h fl P":-,t, I ’’ I',i^ ,.:VL. tr‘-:' r ■•-V’.: M.t, . ir f '’ ''i , ..Vr;iv' : [TTr.^ P' I;I&! ^:v .’’ « I a: M-: • ■ i. ftSsk. ...:. ■I'-, •■ ^ i • / :» / I * M €yt- ""■l\ ji * A£S'/^S c^fic N c Qe:c£-r-£-o ) "T ty •a i 7o \ «■ « J/3% ::te Mi ... //-/ I : '• k • ;« «I 11 f f • f * w. ■ S5T3AC:< rSNC: (CTSC;^ :.*<£) 3-.':’t «:-i;u I * ^ • w ^ ^ ^ r te ?i- “r- • m ^;.- flu If- s> r'‘r I V .;:■■;•■■■ ■:ll.(W'^' j-f-v .<;■" ft. t:- |I' ^ s ■ ^:- • ft' = ? . ,■., . '■ >-;-r-: V|J.v n-i 1% u ' . -■ u t-ft--; £xist:?ig Ha«c svg)? ;:i Z:'<£ • • A. Houss _y'vr^a" X 3S3 ■ /,tTC^ s." « LtNffTrl w I3TH ify. 0 X _^?. a.- S.r /irrCMii ys _ X /. o - ^3 s.?. m •VA X ■ ^ r* S.r# JyvCtf^x # /. o ■ /9* 0 i.?. ^Vk S««»a 1. fiAffAgl _ X . S.7. • c. D rivcway X _■ ^7*30 s.F. wt flpn A ^ • Mi X _ f - S.F. D. StOSlMiC ^ X 6.^• 3^. ^ _ s.f. IP i , V ^aii UPHP 3.0 X *?. aT ■ i^O. i.F. QS X _r -■ /9Y s.f. I. PATIO/ OlCX X __• . 1.^. P.LiNBfCAPf X __• s.^. tMKAIN■V , ___X HA^tC Miruio X ___ • • 1.^. • X ___- f.F. i. (hm _X __1. •• •^ViPOM - l.A. Total fUmcsvtii m Zone Total HonKrr Aaia ui Zam ? a X 100 • //- 1^' if- ?■ ■ |iv .- f-' i; r :■ ,f..'.j I •• t •• I • ! • •*# t « • I ' I ; ■ • • k"r.A:cc2uv, :;l ::l ;::cn :tC.":<::-££:sfTiACx i:ni: Ccr.-c:^ :••<£) O-.”’i/;-iju £,'{:st ::ig Ha;?cc:ve?. I:n£ * - M ^ « 4 m mm • mm^ i \}y^ P 0 ‘ ;l:'f ar>. IL- m KV: W‘ •' i.,. • ^At Hcuss V4< X * ^ ^ • ** ;<■ • ;■’ ! n 9 1 4 W « V W Mi • • LENGTH py. ^ X ^P . O - ;• i .. £Stt i*m4c ya x_/. O » - s.?. m f A X /, ^- 5-K4 j.,. >rV:. - r ' :h 3yV.d «/. p - iSt> t.r. P’- U‘.; k X . 3Vt. ■? *.?. kt- . ■ ■ = T ' ■ • c. D riveway X - s.p. V " «V ;- ■• k >■ ■ . \ ¥■'>.■ :W^_ X - S.P. C amc SVii^ X __-4 ■ 37/ 4 s.p. ■.:, ‘‘■ v>f;,,.Xo X 7. cT*- S~ S.’. [i.X A - /ry i./r. .,«yi; •. <1 , t ■• ■ ■*•■ 1 r ;V. .' • «j-r . h. .(■■ Vllr 1. Jatio / Ofcx X • . S.P. • • m "■fe'r .Landocarc X - i.p. Mf oAT . <« AOtAl UNOmLAIN lY X - i.P. i ‘ RLMTie MITtflO X - • • f.p. f* 1 • X • l.R.1.• 'in .•• Otndi . X • _ l.P. Total fiMocavo in Zomi • Total Pmpvtn Aaia in Zomi S£IiL.t.^- [IJst.F. X UO Ja % . 0-'^ 1 p'-1^' •. n/ •■♦'J - A ■ *' ; * Tfe .3.^ r - >- ' Vi .-.V M •■ Tf-' ''4 ,, I? *'l • i %> »»< * .. fc‘i' * y* ^ • j*"’- av ^Jr.>r •I < ’. j.^1:«' ■ ' ■■ •♦ • Vw '“•■<► ■'1 ■' ' ' 1 > • «*» •■ »- 1 -I.J-1'U / T . •' •■**. ’’rA ' r: ■ h> ' Fi.-I •r.. "* - *4 • ^ • • r f ,) .rXl i . *• * •^' ^;,-.'i - . - V J; • I • — t ^ ^SiBfew *% Vf* i-‘. ^ , » - •» ‘ 1^:1 :ina- . ^ 1- ■;::- •^■"‘’ : ^ -»?# t . V • -». ■<. I< r "■•'. ■’ * •'»■.•. ■' Alt i >f, V «Fa »' f . 1— ••• ^ * A - ■ 1,.-■■■?, h r ? f V ‘ ^ - '•,' ' i'FjUMik <*, ‘[ « •%.. i'.k<^4«> ■•> ■ tfA .A -m m f-- -■*•■ .. »frll"*'«£5 y < L„- To:Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council « Ron Moorse, City Administrator A ^ <P aSvMichael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administ^fctoi^ " "Vo. ^ \ Proa: Date:September 19, 1991 :9.7 % Subject: Moratorium Discussion RE: Lot Line Rearrangements l VVyr.S-VTTiCinvkA. Issues 1.Are lot line rearrangements, which create no new building sites, subject to the land subdivision moratorium? o•’« e If the purpose of the lot line rearrangement is to increase the acreage of a substandard vacant prcoerty to make it buildable, is this type of lot line rearrangement subject to the moratorium? List of Exhibits A B C D Moratorium Ordinance Subdivision Definitions from Subdivision Code Case in Point - Vaughan/Ziesmer Application Sketch, Boyke Proposal Discussion In Application #1680/#1681, Daniel Vaughan is proposing a lot line rearrangement with his son-in-law, Todd Ziesmer, to increase the size of a 1.5 acre vacant parcel to 1.9 acres, and concurrently requests lot area and width variances to construct a residence on this parcel. In reviewing the application at their September 16 meeting. Planning Commission recommended that the Council make a determination whether or not the lot line rearrangement application is subject to the moratorium. By definition, a lot line rearrangement that results in both lots meeting the requirements of the zoning code , is not a subdivision." fi^ollows, then, tEat If one of the two resulting lots doesn't meet zoning code requirements, then by definition, this request ^ a subdivision. In actual practice, whether or not a variance is involved, the City has treated all lot line rearrangements similarly as a "subdivision of a lot line rearrangement”, normally not subject to platting but requiring the Planning Conmission/Council review process. The first issue to resolve is whether a simple lot line rearrangement that leaves both parcels in conformance with the sonlng code, is subject to the moratorium. Please read the Statement of Policy, Section I of the Moratc^rium Ordinance. It is staff's opinion that a simple lot line rearrangement between two existing developed properties, which doesn't create any new building sites, was not contemplated or intended to be subject to the moratorium. Does Council agree? r !'• i‘ t-V 1,-; K ■ f’:' ■■ Moratcrium Discussion September 19, 1991 Page 2 In staff's opinion, the issue becomes muddled wiion a variance and vacant lot situation is introduced. Does the lot line rearrangement effectively create a new buildable lot? If a variance would have been granted for lot area and width absent the lot line rearrangement, is it the variance process or the subdivision process that creates the new building lot? In the Vaughan situation, staff would argue that if sewer vas available and assessed to the vacant 1.5 acre lot in the 2 acre zone, the City would have a hard time denying a variance for ti,e 1.5 acre lot regardless of a lot line rearrangement, as long as setback and hardcover requirements are met. However, in this specific case, sewer is not yet available and adequate septic sites were not found within the 1.5 acre parcel, therefore, it can be argued that the lot line rearrangement is necessary to make the lot buildable. (Note that this item was tabled by the Planning Commission because even with 1.9 acres, septic sites were not adequate.) The second issue, then, for Council to address is whether a lot line rearrangement that has the effect of making an existing substandard lot buildable, is subject to the subdivision moratorium. If so, can Council give the applicant in question any direction, if septic issues can be resolved, as to whether a moratorium variance would be granted if one is applied for? Other Moratorium Related Discussion Paul Boyke resides on a 4+ acre parcel abutting Lydiard Lake. He would like to split off a 2 acre lot. He completed septic testing for this proposal a year ago, but a dispute regarding the deeding of outlots created with his last suMivision, resulted in his holding off on this new request. No formal application has yet been made. In reviewing the enclosed sketch, it is clear that the DNR's 150* structure setbacks from the Ordinary High Water Mark will probably eliminate the type of subdivision Mr. Boyke intended to propose. In that respect, staff has advised him that unless he was to revise his proposal to be compatible with tht amendments being considered, a moratorium variance would be unlikely. Of course, Mr. Boyke is concerned that the new ordinances may eliminate his subdivision possibilities. A request for moratorium variance may be forthcoming.c?aj Tt? DfSCt«SS HiS ^/TVtAT7C>A0 • Regarding the Lyman property on Maxwell Bay, staff is advised that a private party has purchased the property and intends to keep it as an estate rather than subdividing. wiuiii i i ■•;■■>:, > . ' . . :i- •y> i-s-^ ; ■; ■' t ■ ,P'fe '?r 0 f - . 1-, [> r<-»• fe' Moratorium Discussion September 19, 1991 Page 3 Regarding the John Burger property north of Stubbs Bay, this was subject to a sketch plan review at the Planning Commission's September meeting. A proposal to split off a portion of the property outside the 1,000 foot moratorium boundary was considered. Mo formal subdivision application has been forthcoming as of this writing. Staff Re dation Council is requested to give staff direction in the following two matters: 1.Is a simple lot line rearrangement between two developed properties subject to the subdivision moratorium? 2.Specifically in the Vaughan/Ziesmer case, is this lot line rearrangement subject to the moratorium ordinance? If so, would Council advise applicant to request a variance to the moratorium, if septic issues are resolved? lev ..J I F • .. I V ; I*« i • / * I- IV- •i•• • 1^ • / .- I I >t>» •’ ♦ •t. • • • V « '.• A » . n^* ’• « !^'’ b: • # < ► .• ■m fei I. •« •-* lANCE NO. 96.2nd S»n»% •f -s AN ORDMANCE ESTABL6HIN6 AN INTERIM MORATORIUM ON THE QRANTMQ OF LAND SUBDIVISIONS THAT HAVE NOT RECEIVED PRELIMNAnv. APPpOVAL FROM THE CITY i .w • •• U J*» i THE CITY OF ORONO ORDAINS: • • » iir? *7 • ‘ “ ' 1 ! ' ■ ■'.' Th* Munidpal Cod» of tho Ci^ of Ofono Is amondod by adding Ordinanot Ho. 92:2nd ' Sodas. *-.t-•• SECTION 1. S^mmont af Potiew. Tha ClQr Council. Rnds that.tho Cdy Is prosondy. taood whh tho potontel of appHeadons tar subdivision of land whhin 1,000 taot of lakos and 300 faai or tha food plain of eartain < .bibuisdaa uMiin dia CIbr limits. Tha City la in - tha proeass. of siudyH^O and praparing cemprahansiva amandmant of Its ahoraiina ragubdona. Tha OtyCouncI finds that thoro is ‘ an ovarwholming probability that shoralino raguladons wili naad to ba updatad and tavisad. Tha City Counei also finds tfiat such amandmania cannot ba aooomplishad until furthar study has basn compatad and a haarinohald. Slnoa anaetmant of such amandmants wR undoubiadly modify aiistino ragulations concaming subdhdslon of land, tfia procassing M appNeasena during Ms iniarim pariod vrould ba dasitnantal to tha affactuaiion of proposad standard amandmants and contranr to tha purposa of tha aening anabling^aet, Minnaaota SMuias 4S2JS1 . at sag. Tha City Council tarttar Rnds diat It woumm unwisa. imptopar, andtifdust to aRow individual davalopmani to occur during dtis saidy pariod and tvould allow aiinirUiiion(RscriminaBon and unfair advantaga to a low to dia dadimant of tha aniira City. Tharatara. tha City Council finds it nacassary and appropnata to adopt an Intarim Ordinanoa truant to MInnasota Statutas 462.355, Subd.4: r *........' . •. SECTION 2. Rastrietjons on tha QranSiifl at Suhdtwhdaii Anolie«tian« Mb TSS subdivision appUcaSons. asoapt tor thoaa tost afcaady have roeoivad prallminanr approval and tor a subdivision aptweafion of a propatty govamad by a satdamant agraamant batwaan ita ewaa of Long Laha and Orono, shall ba grantod- for any-purpose that would ba meensisiant widi dta appiieudons as ol tha data of adoption of this Ordinanoa and to any ftilhMaUMt MlOiCBteM ~ glCTW 3. • RiigiBtd Afil. Tha portion of tha City of Orono that shall ba subfact to ha rastnetions of this Ordinanoa is al the lar.d containad within tha araa doscribad as toitows; _ ‘ AH'propartias within tha Ci^ of Orono tecatod wRhin 1,000 iaat of tha Ordinary High MbtorMaritofthafoliowinglakas: ' LaksKatina LakaClasson Oickays Laka WoisfsIdLaka LorttLaka LydSrd Laka kbonay Laka HadlayLaka TanagarLaka FranchLaka Forest Laka Lake Minnetonka and associated bays ‘and - * • All prop^as within tha City of Orono locatad within 300or tha flood plain of the tollowing tributarias; ' Paimars Creak (Sactiors 30. 3l Tii8N R23W) • ^ 'Stubbs Bay Creak* (Sections 32. 33 T118N R23W and Sections 4. 5 Tii7N .R23W) ........................................ 'Dicfcay Laka Creak* (Sections 27. 34 turn R23I^ liVoIsfaldfHqly Name Creak* (Sections 26.27.35T116N fCSW) '' ' ' •’ l-9ng Laka Creak (Sections 34 35 Til8N R23Wand Sections 3,10 T117N R23W) - ■ *Forast Laka Croak* (Sections 6.7 Ti7NR23W SECTCN 4. Puration- This ordinance shall ba affactiva.for a period of one year, unless ha City Council datarminas that.it is no longar required because tha raquisita studies have bean oomplatod and adopted and that appropriate avalutoion and action, including any necessary revisions ol tha Zoning Code, have bean finalized..The duration of this Ordinanoa may ba axtandad by adoption of a subaaquant ordinance, for a total additional period of aightaan months. SECTIONS.S Wwiancee Tha City Coundl may Qiant a variance to this Ordinanoa if the City Counefl finds after caralul rawaw of all the facts that a proposal is not oonsary. to the intent of tha Comprahansiva Plan, that it is oompaiiWa withma zoning and official control amandmants being oonsidarad by the City, that it promotes tha health, safety, and welfare of tha dtizans, and that a failure to grant a variance woul<^ create a hardship for the ippiicsnL SECTION 6. ^parabiliN. Fvery section, proviston, or part of this Ordinanoa is dedarad saparabia from every other section, provision, or part: and, if any section, provision, or part thereof or action taken hereunder shall be held invalid, it shall not affect any other section, provision, or part SECTION 7. Effective Pate This Ordinanoa is affective upon adoption by the City Counefl. Adopted by tha City Coutk A of the City of Orono on the 26th day of August. 1991, tiy a imta of 4 arid 0 ."ays. . ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson. Mayor » • * STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) »■ COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) Tha foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day August, 1091, by Barbara A. Peterson and Dorotf^ M. Halfin. Mayor 6 City Clark of the City of Ororw, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said Instrument was executed on behalf of tha City. Notary Public (Published in The Laker and Pioneer Sept. 2, 1991) &XAT. A,]davit State of Minnesota. C Bill Holm, being duly : an authorized agent c of the newspaper knov nesota. and has full kn stated below; A. ) The newspaper ha ments constituting newspaper, as prov 331A.02. 331A.07, amended. B. ) The printed --i {]C'[wiii Mu which is attached we newspaper, and was p week f'^*' ' It was first publis; a V the ^ day c and was thereaftc Monday, to and ir the day c Subscribed and swe day of„ €XH> & r k r i i.r y. 5 11.03 sell, lease, or develop any interest, lot, parrel, unit, site or plot in a subdivision. "Subdivision" - The separation of an area, «arr.oi or tJWt of land Under single ownership into two or tracts, lots, (ot lonq-term leasehold interj^sts wh^e^ the parcels, tr®c J i^g^^eh'dla HT^rest necessitates the cre^o^^_ cr.£A£ui----—^ aiievs”') for relsident iaI7 comberciaTl, industr lal, Ir^r :n-5^^at!on%hereo£, except those separations: a. Where all the resulting Parcels, tracts, iftfeg or interests will be 20 acres or larger in size and 500 fe_ in^width for residential uses and five acres or larger in siz. for commercial and industrial uses;b. Creating cemetery lots;^ c. Resulting from court oraers, or the adjust monfc of a lot line by the relocation of a common boundary n ealh of th'a tTo rLulting lots meets the teouirements of the Zoning Chapter of the City Code. "Subdivision, Classification'. a "Class I Subdivision.!* - A Class I subdivision shall be exempt from platting by J.. City and sha _ e criteria: 1. The subdivision results in no than two buildable lots whe-e each ea°ch Tot “has''at'’‘inst extension of municipal utililties .s involve , 2 The subdivision is a division of property previously combined for only of the creation or alteration of a public or private easement for any purpose. H "Class ‘’’I Subdivision!^ - A Class IIlimited review |?o«duVe°%?ttblisyd -"'tS ThiprerYf it^ets all of the following criteria: 1. The subdivision results in no mot® than two buildable lots, one b“th ^o^which have acres (217,800 square feet) of J{,ich has been less than 300 feet of frontage on a public roadway n ORONO CC 424 (4-1-84) f 5 11.03 "St .0°.S". s; between persons and the City; and. 2, The subdivision does involve the vacation or dedication of public roadways or extension of municipal Utilities; and, 3. The subdivision does not involve any flexible zoning application; and, 4. The subdivision may include the creation of outlets and easements for flowage, conservation, etc, in addition to tne two ouildable *ots. A Class III Subdivision shall be a plat which includes, ^ a subdivision which meets one or more of the following or iteri . 1, The subdivision results in three or more buildable lots, or, subdivision involves a flexible zoning application; or. 3. The subdivision involves the vacation or dedication of a involves the extension of municipal utilities. subdivision. ssuvrii' iSii; S: 70. -Water System (Private ?L‘i\?ti.r“J'stJb-^is^SS^I'a V^dlJidertr^.7v\ tit rmVr^Vo^s? which system is independent from the public water sys em. 71 -Water System (Public)" - A water system which m»y inclade supply, treatment and distribution facilities owned and maintained by the City, ORONO CC 425 (4-1-84) o * iH^U. 1 ■ 'ir j: ?*- ‘j 'A J ■v::/1 t' >- I T-'' •■" - J Vi.i If'-<i '4 S « J \■■_ !3I ____ *;C ^ 8 ^ 8 _J \ \ \ Munt 1)TT BD b b / »-51 "•3"■ ^ \)’ AVE { s*A4 wMrirf » - .iff no M 4n / 2V /• • \ ==:bcsed sui Tone ^.£5M£i^ A DANIEL VAUGHAN iN lCTS 5 i 2C. AUO. sua NO 203. AND SECTION 5**n7“23 HENNE.=’N COUNTY. MINNESOTA i«r«* «0 4«* •'Im f V'.-f c> 1 •i r i Tl ,; it ^ «• A| rr^ * ■■• ^ .*• • I mu* ''•- M99»*i >#"» »» »f *!.^*f* rx;sT!NC -rsAL :Esr7!^::**5 ftr?*l »; A* ^ - / A ». J- • « • ‘ 1#^ ••• ►» rr p«ft af iov«rr.»*Rl iJt -. i«ctiS.‘' !. ?3wn»0 4p — 4ort.*.. 2 3 ‘-••t p? Itr. -•fiiian, i«tcr;>p«<l « .s*- .-, . poi.« ii.t.M i5i.:j U.t s: •.^•. SAit lia« o« Tft« **ort.i««ft Cu*r:«r af S#czion ?owti«nxp iunq« :: «*a dxicanx :5l-: ft«t .Nart.-. aJ :.*»• iout.i .ina a. -..-t Suartar oS taia Sac^ioa 5: tn«nc* Eaat parai^ai ^ -o tna So«cA ;ioa af »a*a Nart.naaac ;yarttr a aittanca o< .J-. . faac: tnaiica S«uui and parailai ta tfta Caac lina of aoid a 41ataaca of J73.I foot: tAoaco woat and P^raiiai witn Soatn i*na of taad wor^floaot Joartor a aii- »«aca of »?.I7 fo«t: inanco $oatn and paraiioi aatn rno Caat Ixaa of aaad J»dt-tadaoi quartOf a dafcaaco of fod« Xa t.'ia canaar :ina of CMtraldadr taoMO aoacarly aionf eontar .ina toad a diacanea of ’' ■?. f loot to a pdint diocanc ill..2 foot aaaa of tR« Sata -.no of taii •«ort-*?aaat Juartar? t.tanco qortn and parailai to tna taat ina of oaid Noxtnaaat .uafcar a diaajoco of Ifr.ri foot to t.na point sf oaornniaf. mzrr tnat para of taa aao»a oaacriaad tract oaacriadd aa foliowat Taa louca lOC faat of taa aartr. :?).! foot o- t.aa Laat .lalf of iat IC. iaditof * $aodi¥ia*on auMar -aj.. aanna- piA CowBtY. ainnaaeca. Laitar i J»J. rtCZTT >jut »»tt ot 5. dnerxM. <• S»ilo..i Wmt^aun •* «»• »•»»«■••» coTBdr of laviada Addition to Ldoa niaodionaai taanca aocta- Miv alddd a iUM wnica la taa aartadriy pTdladtion of taa fOMCfivdat lay rifat of ri» alood a iUM woica la taa aartaariy proladtion of taa lalarlTiina of Aiaca 3. layaida Addition to Lana ynaataa^> J!; rJ:'.n2liaa of taa puaaaaata onataco aaiiraaa ■ nr •• !I;: aaaaitfod at ri«at aaaiaa taacofroa* taa.*da S^tnaaatarlv • load a lina dfooa parailai to taa Saatoaaatariv lino of »aid MMoau OMtorm Jiirood Coaaaay fiont of «ay and «0 foot ____ - - ----------— ■ - *nAM#na. anaavrad at rttBt aaoiaa. *9Axaiidadca oootar* aaiiroad coaoany riwn« -wr * ‘I liataat $aata««aatariy taa paiat of lataroadtiaa of aaid .laa •ita tha P^4etiaa of taa Saatariy Uaa of tioca 3. law.ida Addition to idoa Aiaaaoaaaat ;aaaiaa at taa £oaa oinnaranai ■orTfiarlT iiaa •» —---— —-------..M^otaxiy alaaa taa norxaariv liao of Aaytida Additiaa to taa paiat of aaainnina lino as a. maai tnaaca faaaaarly alaao aaid oarxaarly pro- ■aatddiy iiaa af tiaan 3. layaida Addition ta I ta taa lataroactiaa of said liaa vtta taa Qi aayaida AOditiaa ta Lana nta^tonaa; tnanea ----------------nA««vdn additiaa to ido» A/#, ^d -iia toryoy lataado to anao taa aowadiriao of tfia taara. do- ^laad Praiarry. aad taa location of an naiatino .noana ono M amaatiaftaada taaroon. ;t ioao not purport to inoa o«y Lflpcoaaaaaaa or oncrooonannto. 1 «r«»n* 1 'MO 1 I * (---' ^ —■ «•—tt:—zzzzl ------1 —:_m COfTlN &: CRONBFRC, I.\C. ^ j ^ ............... • ).•••* .*?. .fl.i.' / • • •.f: .,.1 - ^ . .. .. bv.'/ ... •■ - ' -, iv"- .■':: >. ^'■'«„ m.. - ’’.i^r:' U-.'v /p■•• .,vi. ■-■•V t. m- $ fr ^rorosecJ Let D V|5 f^dul i Gir.i be Lots 1 and 1, Blr):» i. Mennepiri Count*. V!nnt*soId , lAliRAfifA WOODS 6 CtiOt. wr7£>*^'-* AJD ^ V 1 ex I ST IH5 oeSCRIPTIOil MS OC£F/^e^ l^r Op COc-tMaj ^' /^Am^ WA^ " ^OT 1* Block I, LAUftAtJN£ WOODS lot J, DlOCl lA'JkAfJKt MiOI'l dCCOC’Jioo tl* \t* E'lAt Ih^r^* PROPOSED DtSCRIPTIOWS £tN»i i/ic/o't A. Lot ], Block 1, LAURANNE WOODS, according to me recoroed pla: tnereot except tfiat pan of said lot 1 which lies east of a line drawn norm porperJirula^ ic me siutr. line of said Lot 1 from the post westerly corner of Outlet A. lacrac'C* wOCT.i. B. That pan of Lot 2, Block 1, lying south of the north a?0.0C feel mer-of and west of a line drawn north perpendicular to me south line of lot 1 Bloci^ 1 fret ti- most west erly comer of Outlot A, all in iAURAMh£ WOODS, according to me recorcea Mat iru*rec?. C. The nonn 270.00 feet of Lot 2. Block l. lauRamne WOODS, according to me recordedplat tnereof. O ~f \ >A* y c:>^ ^c- . 0. That pan of Lots \ and 2, Block i. Iving south of me nortr i/u* 0-. *ee; o* m ^r* and east of a line drawn nonn perpendicular to me soutn nne cf uid ,ot • :• r'mt BOSt westerly corner of Uitlot A, all in tAURAfifiE WOODS, accord<ng to f^e '■e"L' t^c plat thereof. Date : IC-30.S7 Scale: r * i00 ‘ 0 : Iren Daruer I^hereov certify in*- this is a tru-* an: op-e v* cf a suTBre* of me Ooun^a-'ies of me ar>cve des-*-! 'e* '^rr ':l It does net purper*. ;c snow an* ifrorcie'^ef’ts t • iZ‘i^ r*' COAAII. t, GJ-uhr ______ a ;3>; Ron Moocse, City Administra w FROM:fohn R. Gerhardson, P'lblic : 1rect a r '^<v» DATE:September 19, 1991 SUBJECT: Frontage Road Bid Award \ % on August 23, 1 99 1 , the City of Orono received and opened oids for the construction of the frontage road off Old Crystal Bay Road to serve the new city facility and other properties. In addition to the road construction we also Did the construction of sanitary sewer and watermains that would serve the city facility and other properties in the future. The following is a summary of the bids received: B & D Underground, Inc. LaTour Construction, Inc. Northdale Construction, Inc. Widmer, Inc. G & L Contracting, Inc. $188,786.00 203.224.00 205.704.00 225,425.65 235.165.00 The following is a breakdown of the project costs: Part A Sanitary Sewer part B Watermain Part C Storm Sewer part D Streets $ 19,362.00 53.845.00 16.928.00 98,651.00 The seller of the property will pay for the street construction costs which amount to $98,651.00. The City intends to withhold the amount at the closing, which is tentatively set for September 26, 1991. The sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer will be paid for from the PIR fund and will be reimbursed from the HRA or will be calculated as a connection charge to new development of the area. Recommendation - To award the bid for the frontage road and installation of utilities to B & D underground, Inc. for an amount of $188,786 and to begin construction on September 27, 1991, or the day following the closing date. , seconded by , to award the bid for the frontage road and ftTstallation of utilities to B 6 D PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by Underground, Inc. for an amount of $188,786 and to begin construction on September 27, 1991, or the day following the closing date. Ayes _, nays _. TO:Mayor Peterson and City Council FROM: Ron Moorse, City Administrator Forwarded recommending approval. 'r lV*;-’ W: Q 1 2 Q 4-. TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator September 18, 1991 V o ■. i ' i SUBJECT: Cable Commission Budget I have attached a copy of the letter sent to Jennifer Watts, the Cable Administrator, indicating the City's concerns with the proposed 1992 Cable Commission budget. I have also spoken with Ms. Watts, who indicated she would be interested in attending a Council meeting to respond to the City’s concerns. r o o A . ’ ■*'' CITYof ORONO MunicipiJ Offices Pdsf Office Bo\ 6* Cn^ Bav. Minnesota 553IMWS6 September 12, 199 I I F u-Av.r- = Me. Jennifer Watts, Administrator Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission 443 Oak Street Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 Dear Jennifer: In reviewing the proposed 1992 Cable Communications Co^ission hudaet the City of Orono has concerns similar to tn expressed by the City of Spring Park. indicated the general increase in expenses j.s - P P iSSreSsrin opirating expenses is 12.7%. The salal? in salaries is a major reason for this ^increase. The tv.o salar, items show increases of nearly l/% ana xj%. You indicated in your letter of September 10 that you have directed to conduct a salary survey of comparable positions. The proposed salary increases appear to assume the cable staff .s currently significantly underpaid. Until the survey is completed, it may be more prudent to use a more conservative salary figure. The Council will be meeting with Tim Fattrin to review the prSpo^ed budget, and may need additional information before taking final action on the budget. If you have any questions, please call Sincerely, RONALD MOORSE City Admin * strator me. RM/ch cc:Tim -trin Mary b'ltler Cable Commission Member Cities TELEPHONE - r>7357 • FAX • 4TMS10 t ■■ ■ .'>■ ■I • l.L-m____- '4h / 6 TO: FROH: DATE: Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Adir..nistrator /'://'■ Septemoer 19f 1991 SUBJECT: Contract for Engineering Services far Ordinary High Water Levels Determination of Attached is the proposal from Barr Engineering Company for determination of ordinary high water level for French^ Classen, Dickey and Lydiard Lakes. Staff requested that John Shardlow assist the city in selecting the firm to perform this work. A j^gttet from John Shardlow explaining the need for tt.is work and indicating his recommendation of Barr Engineering for the project is attached. Staff Recommendation - It is staff's recommendation that the contract for engineering services for the determination of ordinary high water levels for French, Classen, Dickey and Lydiard Lakes be awarded to Barr Engineering in the contract amount of $4,100. r. ■r)‘. I- t. h: 'V.t. I'.' ♦ l DAI II CiRrN' SI l/Mvl M V AVAN I,^ I 'S/VN CON S.-'I-TING I ’_ANDSC."H .-Jr.C- Tiers rtTiST A'. i.VL'i N'::RT- ai>«WN:rorEA?oi:.s v.\- --i •■^12 ‘ yy* -:ZZ0 MEMORANDUM DATE: 19 Sepcember 1991 TO: Ron Moorse, City AtJministrator FROM: John W. Shardlcw, AICP RE;Summary of Bad^ound Regarding Barr Eagmeering's Proposal co Map Ordinary High Water-(OHW) Elevations for Orono Lakes Where Such Elevations Have Yet to be EstabE^ed First of all, coogratulatiDTis on your new positioir You wli find many differences between Rose^e and Orono, bat the most important similarity is that you wDI once again get to wbricwitLmany tme people Best of luck and please know that we are here to help in any way chat we can. I a*****"^ chat you are familiar with the broader backgroimd sorrounding tics issue the pfesfioiis efforts to develt^ a set of model ordinance standards for all of the Lake ^ Minnetonka communities.and subsecjuently the problems that emerged, and Orono’s decisibn to prepare and adopt its own ordinance. If you have any questions, I suggest you aric Mike Gaffron and, if you wish, I am happy to provide you with any badeground that mi^rabo be needed. Tbebaaie tecommendation that I offered to the Lake Use Committee and the course have been following has been to work with the basic MnDNR Model Ordinance and to onl^ vary firom h-when there is a significant reason to do so. From a strategic penpecrive, V%e andIhave met with MnDNR staff in an open and cooperative manner to infonn them as to our approach and to review those areas in whidi Orono zoning and oomprdicfisive pi^nmeg issues do not real^ fit the modeL The good news is that in virtual^ all of the cases, Orono ismore-reairictive than the model and the MnDNR mtmtf b vecy open to working with us to fadlitate the resolution of these technicalides. In foct, thb process has-been proceeding so smoothly that Mike and I agreed that my involvement should be placed on hold unless a need arises for my assistance. One of the issues that has arisenis-tbat Ordinary High Water Elevations have not been established for some of the lakes that will be regulated through the adoption of the new ordinance. bi the past, MnPNB. will come bur and determiae these OHWs when an appltadon b pending. They hive literally a sin^e survey crew to do all of this work ai%H their time b scheduled on a first-come first-served basis. _________________te-. • « |r -••• ■ * • !•. . .r Roo Moorse, 19 September 1991 Page 2• . -_JBoth Mike and I feel strondy that the deieniiinarion p£ these QHWs is a prerequisite ■■ • for thea«Jministration of a aw Shordand Zoning program. Our first appro^ w^. to ask MiiDNR S thcv could schedule the tnne to do this work and it was very dear that -theysimply conldnotcomply^tf* thafrequest: I then su«est^that they assist us bvianng liie methodology and process th^ foDow m making these dctcnninations, - amd Ac could Aen retain its ovyn hydrolo5*st to make these determmaaons. In mv discusaon^A Aem Aey agreedro go one step filtAcr by having members of their Staton she wiA the <3iiv*s^nsHltot:to7nisureithat they agreed wiA the analysis and could-Aen sign off on Ac OHWs. .If they_did .not participate in this wav we would essentialhr be in a situation whereMnDhlg. would still need to make a determination on a case-by-SUSC basis, «ven if Ae Cigr tad established its own OHWs. • * •Largely.due to Ae d«ire to foster Ac sphii of cooperation, I asked three of Ae •"‘MnDNR staif members independently yhiefa firms in this region could do Ais work, A *eacA-cu$pr Ae first name that w» mentioned was Barr Engineering and subsequ^tly • each mentioned JAlMontgomery (formeriy Hjckock): I have worked wth both firms. boA in Ae past-and recen^, and lAtlLace qualified to do this. work. My oqiejiencc ' WiA boA-finns has been posidvc_ Attthmffi .b^gci^ I wodd reco^ to thoir SQdc Jtnd approacli and from my expcnenc^, it is my opinion that their wnCtciL mater^ and presentation skills have been sup'^qr, in my dcpericnce. _ Yow na*’ choose to get a proposal from^fontgbmery..I believe A^ rate stwernr^ to '•be^essentially identical and Ae Barr propo^ to be limited to just Ae work Aat is aeedfid to get Ac job done. Please let me feow if you need any adAtional I informatioii. 3 t . . - • . 1 • . 1. a ^ — » s • . *i M r ilorrEnaineering Corroany 7803 Glwro/ Roaa Mmnaapolis. MN 55439-3 ^23 612/830-0555 612/835-0186 (facsimile) iER -® September 6. 1991 Mr. Mike Gaffron City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 RE: Proposal for the Determinacion of OHVL's of Four Lakes in Orono Dear Mr. Gaffron: yg have prepared a scope of work and cost estimate for determining the ordinary high water level (OHWL) of French. Classen. Dickey and Lydiard Ukes in Orono. Minnesota. The OHWL's of each lake will be determined in cooperation with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR). The scope of work for this project consists of the following casks • TASK 1 ** Obtain information on benchmarks near each lake. ■ TASK 2 --Assist MDNR Hydrographic Unit with determination of OHWL of French Lake. • TASK 3 •• Determine OHWL of Classen. Dickey and Lydiard Ukes. TASK A -* Prepare a letter report Ceil Strauss of the MDNR recommended that, if possible, the MDNR Hydrographic Unit determine the OHWL of French Uke because of anticipated difficulties. This may not be possible because of the workload of the Hydrographic Unit. If the crew can be scheduled within a reasonable time, we will observe this process to enable us to closely duplicate their procedures •r establishing OHWL's. The OHWL's of the other lakes (Classen. Dickey and iard Ukes) will be determined by Barr with the technical assistance of Strauss. In general, approximately 10 to 15 indicators of OHWL will be surveyed around each lake. A representative number of the indicators will be photographed for documentation purposes. A letter report will be prepared • •Mr. John Shardlow September 6. 1991 Page 2 that describes the procedures and the Indicators used to determine the 0^. We have assumed that survey benchmarks will not be available in the immediate vicinity of the lakes. A cost estimate for the determination of the OHWL's of French. Classen, Dickey and Lydlard Lakes Is shown in Table 1. The estiaaced cose for schedule in use by the Company at the time the work is carried out. Barr will not exceed the budget of $4,100 without your prior approval. If you have any questions or require further information, please contact Randy Duncan or me at 830-0555. Sincerely. Dennis E. Palmer DEP/lah Enclosure c: John Shardlow 00\03\091\MG.LTR -n..«r-»¥» ‘ • • r.. E- I; t i.'- >• s- hiSi ■ J. TABLE 1 COST ESTIMATE OHW DETERMI!IATION FOR FOUR LAKES ORONO, MINNESOTA eSTINATEO HOURS TASK ENVIRONMCHTAL SCIENTIST S60/hr SURVEY TECHNICIAN S45/hr SUPPORT SERVICES S35/hr EXPENSES t 1 SUBTOTALS S AstlRt MDNR Nydrotraphic Unit with OAtaniiMtlon of ONU of Pronch Loko Ootoniint ONU of ClMttn, Oicicoy. ond IvdUrd Lolc — 2.S60 Proporo lottT roport 400 10X Contingencies TOTAL S3,725 _375 S4.100 ^Includes equipment rental and mileage 00\03\091\MG.LTR\LAH Vi. ' TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator/^/^ September 18# 1991 *</ SUBJECT: Request For Proposals for Prosecution Service In response to a proposal for prosecution service from the City of Minnetonka with costs significantly less than the City's current annual cost» it is recommended that the City request proposals for the prosecution service in an effort to ensure the roost cost effecti’e prosecution service. . a. 1 A u;. '.‘V S' ?ie r^l.f r '■ / Co. TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Septemoer 18» 1991 SUBJECT: Police Schedule/Temporary Investigator Assignment ^0 O I have attached a memo from Chief Sullivan advising of improvements to the Police scheduling process and a plan of temporary assignment of a police officer to perform plain clothes investigator duties during a portion of his shift schedule. The temporary assignment will provide information regarding a level of need for a plain clothes investigator. r^‘ 4 T »-♦ ^ 4 i w/ «w ^r ice i < s.< i ‘ « -■ Date: September 16, 1991 To:City Administrator Ron Moorse Orono City Council From: Chief Sullivan Re:Schedule/Inveatigator Assignment I plan to implement a new schedule for the police department on September 30, 1991. I have changed the Lieutenant’s schedule to provide better hours of supervision during the busier days of the week than under the existing schedule. I have also made several changes in the patrol officers schedule to provide better coverage, meet the requirements of the existing contract, and reduce the overtime costs that the department has been paying. I believe there is a need to change the method that we conduct our follow-up investigations. There needs to be Increased accountability and structure so that some of the “routine" cases do not fall between the cracks; for after all, to a crime victim, there is no such thing as a "routine" crime. I am not sure how many hours per week are needed to conduct proper follow-up investigations. With the existing manpower of 14-1/2 officers, I cannot assign an officer full-time to investigations and still maintain minimum patrol coverage. Therefore, this temporary schedule (it will be in effect until 12/31/91) will provide for a part-time investigator. I have assigned Officer Morowczynski to be a plain clothes investigator on the day shift on Mondays, Tuesdays, and Fridays. He will perform uniformed patrol duties on the 3pm to 11pm shift on Wednesdays and Thursdays. On those days, he may still perform some investigations, but he will be responsible for normal patrol functions as a general Orcno patrol officer. This temporary, part-time investigator assigiiment will help to clear up a back log of some cases that need to be investigated and will help me to assess exactly how many hours per week are needed to provide proper follow-up investigations for the department. These changes are temporary because we do not know what changes may occur between now and the coming year. 92091.1 TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council FROM: Ron Moorse, City Administrator ^ DATE: Septemoer 20f 1991 SUBJECT: Police Service Contract % ' / ^ $ %o Attached i= the letter sent to the City of Long Lake regarding past due pu*ice service contract payments and the letter from Chris Dietzen, the City Attorney for Long Lake, responding to my letter. Mr. Dietzen in his letter indicates it is his understanding the City of Long Lake is current on its quarterly payments. I have spoken to Mr. Rettinger, a counciImember from Long Lake, who indicated the Long Lake City Council approved payment of the third quarter amount on Tuesday, September 17th. If this is the case, we should receive the payment prior to the September 23rd Council meeting. ‘v' o o ’Cfv '' CITY of ORONO Mujvcioal Offices Pr>sl Office Box 66 Crvciai Bav. Minnesnu 55313-»6 September 12, 1991 LuVerne Hanson Clerk-Treasurer City of Long Lake 1964 Park Avenue Long Lake, MN 55356 Dear Ms. Hanson: I have enclosed a in^‘acc°ordance^ wi°t^h Police letter^will attempt to clarify each item so that they can be paid. . , .. 1 ,•-« - ■>'^91. The contract calls for dxie. c1.rYsYop\e; oTta/.Tn Lke'L’i'buSgetea «39 000 for the 1991 the f ;="area“hrn^/Lkl'’«rnrea't^ lock, at ways tc teauce expenses to "eep the Po li Vh" of O^or.c incluaing the ®3'4 ^ the hours of the part-time ?flfcVr*ass!gn'^a°a to'Ln/ Lake. He"will be scheaulea for only one 8 hour shift per week. Most of the $4,000 difference will be offset by the 1990 credit of $3,438. 3 1909 debit balance due. This item has been j®y^has ;?;^i"a*J^"in?otm^i!on T^SFL'¥rTi^^ih"a^as"or"a•at.^. T.ll Chief Hllbo to Mayor Kunse Hated June 2, 19 process used to inv«^^e^he,arso^,gase. S'-. r LuVerne Kanson September 12, 1991 Page 2 Mr Arlo Van der Vegte in a memo to Mark Eernhardson datec August 27 1991 alsrquestioned ‘.he additional cost. His concern was that the City of Long Lake should not have to pay for specific tnat cne ^ 4-sai- these we’-e a part of theinvestigative services, ne felt that t. e P vecte services rendered under the general agreement. Mr. waroorrect in that investiqative services ' generally included as part of the services rendered under - • qeneral contract. However, the City of Orono does -itv^^^ThTs auditto determine actual costs incurred by t . includes both the general services budget and n?ual IxpenLtures related to each City. All Pf coded to the specific City in which they are worked final contract amounts are truly actual expenditures and lefle the number of hours actually worked in each City. The expenditures are accounted for in this way so that i. ich ?l?y t nSrSal level of activity the budget works foi^ all if one Citv has an extraordinary level o rir»"ai:irthrrV con+ ract cities. ra.n-9-*iiv the audits result in credits since the actual exoenditUes normally are less than the budgeted expenditures. In^l989 the debit is an exception caused .tv the extensive arson investigation . 4. Flrat half ”n%“r\%*t tMs paTd^uV in the third and fourth quarters. SUMMARY Based on the information above, the revised Sy *^*'saote^er*2Cl'^\’99l''^*If*yo“”ave Vestions or concerns, please Su LrUesl conveyence so tLt the September 20 date can be met. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely --------------------- Ron Hoorse City Administrator Betsv Swartwood, 1964 Pa,.k Ave., Long Lake, MN 55356 TATeT. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly a lindgren, LTD, 1500 Northwestern Financial Center, 7900 Xerxes Ave. S., Bloomington, MN 55431 RM/slv f\ o oI City of ORONO P.O. Box 6<S CRYSTAL BAi'. MN PHONE; 4T3-"35 'Zl'2'i J7 1J::C lAIw 1964 ?Ar:-: .v.'riiL- Lc:iG LAnz, :cj Sj:3u THIRD QUA3IZR POLICZ CC:JTPACT 1JULY, AUCl’ST, 3E?TT:!BEH) 1991 3£CC:.T> QUARTS?. 1991 9.MAUCS TUT FIRST QUARTZ? 1911 3ALAI1C2 OUR zzciiiD ZTiiz* 1935 11317 i;ja::c3 3 FIRST .sAL7 1?39 33BIT 3AL.*-i:.’C- 3L' FIRST ’.LMS* 1990 IRZ3IT ^ATE ___• •»ci» AMOUNT $60,372.75! I 1,969.00. I 1.069.00 I 5,:’04.0 6.704.00 (1,719.00) XC I ! i 1 « 1 1 1 1 ! PAY THIS AMOUNT $74,699.75 • INVOICE DUE AND PAYABLE UPON RECEIPT. • RETURN ONE COPY OF THIS INVOICE WITH YOUR REMITTANCE. Y fe fi'k l;,I'P'I'k. r"'- f# i :i \ f K’ !Tv. 1'^: ir : f"IL *■ r; m. ^'i>.''R'w f' -I ^i Mayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator •7 TO: FROM: DATS: June^ 1990 SUBJECT: Police Department 1989 Corporate Report Attachment:A. Police Department 1989 Corporate Report B. 1989 Police Department Operations Financial Report Forward recommending acceptance PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by the Orono City Council acknowledges receipt of the Police Department's 1989 QOfpQrate Report including the 1989 Financial results. Ayes __t Nays l > * f l! ii^ f u ^ t^ :31?'?.: ’ CITV OF ORONO ACTOAl. COST DISTRIBUTION BY PARTICIPANT COMPARED TO ESTIMATED COST DISTRIBOTION BY PARTICIPANT 1989 BDDG8T TSAR ESTIMATED COST DISTRIBUTION ORONO LONG LAKE niHNETONKA BEACH SPRING PARK TOTAL Conposit % applied except to Contract Charge 10.91%13.004 6.25%9.84%100.0004 Base Budget Adainistratlon $479,982 47,999 $ 88,018 8,602 $42,305 4,230 $ 66,603 6,660 5676,908 67,691 Total Police Town Aid Credit (1988-89) 527,981 (24,889) 96,820 (4,564) 46,535 (2,193' 73,263 (3,454) 744,599 (35,100) Total Net of Town Aid Contract Charge 503,092 92,256 19,027 44,342 9,145 69,809 14,398 709,499 42,570 Total $503,092 $111,283 $53,487 S 84,207 5752,069 Additional Manpower Town Aid Credit (1988-89) $110,488 (9,750) $176,139 (15,600) $286,627 (25,350) Contract Charge 100,738 6,044 160,539 9,633 261,277 15,677 Total $106,782 $170,172 $276,954 GRAND TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $503,092 $218,065 $53,487 5254,379 $1,029,023 ACTUAL COSTS DISTRIBUTION Gross Costs Adainistratlon S490.668 49,067 S 89,955 8,995 $43,24'/ 4,325 $ 68,089 6,809 $691,959 69,196 Total Police Town Aid Credit (1988-89) 539,735 (28,050) 98,950 (5,143) 47,572 (2,472) 74,89') (3,892) 761,155 (39,557) Total Net of Town Aid Contract Charge 511,685 93,807 19,348 45,100 9,3C3 71,006 14,645 721,598 43,296 Total $511,685 $113,155 s 54,403 $ 85,651 $764,894 Additional Manpower Town Aid Credit (1988-89) $122,123 (10,502) 5180,660 (16,803) $320,783 (27,305) Total Net of Town Aid Contract Charge 111,621 6,697 163,857 9,832 275,478 16,529 Total $118,318 $173,689 $292,007 GRAND TOTAL ACTUAL COST $511,685 $231,473 $54,403 $259,340 $1,056,901 Actual Costs Over (Under) Est. Costs $ 8,593 $ 13,408 $916 S 4,961 $ 27,878 Charge (Credit) to 1990 Contract Billing Date 07/01/90 Billing Date 10/01/90 $ 6,704 6,704 $458 458 $ 2,480 2,481 total CHARGE (CREDIT)$ 13,408 $916 $ 4,961 rv.ifc ilL., .■ — L-,«; H' ■ i! I til^. Mark Bernhardson, City AdministratorTO: FROM:Tom Kuehn, Finance Director DATE:June 1, 1990 SUBJECT: 1989 Police Department Operations - rinancial Attached ate schedules comparing the 1989 actual expenditures to the budgets £ot the police department operations in ‘‘'f contract, and the additional manpower <;ost distribution by ci y and the resulting amount due to or from each city. Ils"» The net effect of the 1989 final contract costs is that Long Lake Sill be charged 513,408 in 1990, Minnetonka “‘Ysi’*iri990 $916 in 1990, and Spring Park will be charged ' These are a result of higher than anticipated josts offset somewhat by higher than anticipated revenues from the St^te for -Police Town Aid- and for the POST state aid for schooling. \ ^ ^ ^ ^ I (!?■ '-■: W-- r- . r' i’% if.' )H” t f- S' ‘S: cm GF GBONO PCUCE DQ>ARmE»ir 1989 bUiliCgr YEMt year QCED IXKSfiBt 31, 1989 Salaries - Regular Salaries • Overtime Salaries • Ten^rary Salaries > severence Salaries - Holiday (union) P»E«R»A« and F«I»C*A* Hospitalization & Life Insurance Worker Condensation Insurance Office Supplies Motor Feels and Lubricants Clothing & Personal Equipment Building & Grounds Maint. Supplies Equipment Parts & Access Books & Periodicals Training Siqpplies Legal Consulting Other Consulting Telephone Postage Printing & Publishing Utilities Radio Rental Building Rental Maintenance - office Equipment • Automotive Equipment - Hisc. Equipment - Building & Grounds Janitorial Service LOGIS - Admin. Servioes/t)ata Processing Meetings, Conferences & School Insurances Mmaber ships Travel, Mileage, Parking Licenses k Taxes Capital Outlay > Buildings • Office Furniture & Equip - Automotive Equipment « Other Equipment POST State Aid Reimbursement TOXAL BCDGET BASE ccmimn' ACTJAL ACTUAL OVER (UNDER) BUDGET $362,490 $362,197 $ (293) 10,750 21,300 10,550 5,500 6,091 591 “0—-0--0- 9,686 8,638 (1,048) 46,588 48,207 1,619 22,550 26,208 3,658 18,533 16,502 (2,031) 6,000 7,618 1,618 28,000 24,658 (3,342) 6,876 7,537 661 300 442 142 4,500 7,322 2,822 1,200 1,769 569 3,800 925 (2,875) 1,500 857 (643) 7,000 6,723 (277) 7,000 7,419 419 1,800 1,866 66 2,500 5,471 2,971 2,900 3,429 529 12,260 7,171 (5,089) 9,080 10,286 1,206 3,500 2,143 (1,357) 11,000 18,509 7,509 1,500 1,935 435 1,500 2,722 1,222 3,200 3,502 302 8,570 13,524 4,954 9,000 11,382 2,382 19,650 21,888 2,238 1,360 1,754 394 650 644 (6) 180 781 601 1,000 -0-(1,000) 2,400 1,381 (1,019) 28,900 32,521 3,621 4,500 3,792 (708) (7,155)(7,155) $667,723 T691,459 $ 24, 52190.11CITY OF ORONO POLICE DEPARTMENT 1989 BUDGET YEAR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1989 rjnui T.AKB ADDITIONAL MANPOWER Salaries - Regular Overtime Holiday P.E.R.A./F.I.C.A. Hospitalization & Life Ins. Workmens Compensation insurance Clothing & personal Equipment Memberships 6 Licenses TOTAL ADDITIONAL MANPOWER gpmilG PARK ADDITIONAL MANPOWER Salaries - Regular Overtime Holiday P.E.R.A./F.I.C.A. Hospitalization & Life Ins. Workmens Compensation insurance Clothing & Personal Equipment Memberships a Licenses TOTAL ADDITIONAL MANPOWER BUDGET $ 80,900 3,750 3,439 10,549 5,700 5,266 824 60 $110,488 SS 3 $129,180 6,000 5,435 16,793 <^,020 8,331 1,300 80 $176,139 S3 ACTDAi $ 88,746 6,768 3,644 12,545 5,180 4,690 950 -0- $122,523 $133,558 7,952 5,545 18,256 6,586 7,415 1,348 -0- $180,660 8 S S S S3 ACTUAL OVER fUNDER) BUDGET 7,846 3,018 205 1,996 (520) (576) 126 (60) $ 12,035 38S3SS 4,378 1,952 110 1,463 (2,434) (916) 48 (80) $ 4,521 SS3 SERVICE YEAR POLICE SERVICE CONTRACT ORIGINAL CONTRACT AI'iOUNT ADJUSTMENT APPLIED FOLLOWING YEAR « « • ^ ^ NET CONTRAC COST CITY OP LONG LAKE 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 $218,065 231,806 213,171 213,226 158,005 149,485 130,328 121,497 114,724 112,887 63,936 $ 13,408 (9,550) (8,201) (19,691) 3,701 (3,247) 2,320 (14,969) (8,694) (2,466) (892) $231,473 222,336 204,970 193,535 161,706 146,238 132,648 106,528 106,030 110,421 63,044 CITY OP MiNNBTOHKA BEACH # t ji- i* r I;r I h Iw 1989 $53,487 $ 916 $54,403 1988 53,812 (4,360)49,452 1987 46,889 (73)46,816 1986 44,478 (980)43,490 1985 38,753 (1,226)37,527 1984 36,379 385 36,764 1983 32,592 916 33,508 1982 29,459 (1,205)28,254 1981 25,820 564 26,384 1980 26,889 1,134 28,023 1979 19,616 (271)19,345 CITY OP SPRING PARK 1989 $254,379 $ 4,961 $259,340 1988 244,237 (20,498)223,739 1987 220,193 to198,212 1986 227,553 (23,340)204,, 213 1985 173,957 (410)173 5 1.' 1984 164,235 (5,845)158,350 1983 153,222 (2,053)151,169 1982 141,936 (6,212)135,724 1981 (1st year)130,548 3,302 133,850 w jmmmm p wa »«»»n f»0»CI»T L, VAC« r OAkV O. MCMWCTM W«NOO»«»» •CttAwO M. ratCOCLi. ItiWAW c. ■MCirf JL wtHMCSSf^ ^AMKS c. CaiCK»OM C9WA49D j. OA'SCOL u •CMC N. rvfULC" 04^10 c. SCLUCaOMCN JOMN a rULLMCa flO«CI»T K. aOVtK tmtkHn. *. HAWvc^ eHAMLCB S. MODCLt CMUtSTOaMCd J. OICTXC*- ^MM n. SCATTIC UMOA M. riSHCn T*«OMA« p. STOtTMAN •rcvcM a. LCvtM ttlCMACV C- JAC*»*«AN C. OICnl Larkin , tlorrM.vN, Daly iS: I.ini )(.;rln . Lid A'^’TOPNE'^S at :.a *v 500 NCe'^MVvCS'ERN • '*an C ’900 «C»xCS AvCNtjG SCvj’^^ BLOOMisO’CN. ^’%^*ESO*A 55A3 •£LGP*^0NC 6 2 835 3SOO 62 896 3333 3000 p pro _^*rroA^ 2.‘'2 SOo**< N M ►•sEA**C« S v sn ESC*^ ^5-i' ■£-rO‘^CSC c* 2 -3 3 6 6610 <?3 336 9'’6 0 TMOMA6 A ruTHM •• OU'MN tO0O I. mCKMAN •fCPWCN a SOLOMON PCT6II «. OtCH 4SOOMC M. vLA mma C SItCMiU. n. OMAN •CfiAkO L.SCCA 40MM 6. LUNOOLMS’ •S¥LS NOOM • TMOMAS a HUMPH SC’. J». aiCMACk T MSaiM MClNtAM k. TAkLC VtHeCMT & Ckl> iworw -L MlTCMCUk ^•MM A.COTTCH* •CATfllCC A. MOTh WCICCP *.A . . n A.,N* f • ^ • s ^ • .. -C ^ • A-«.CC»« M »CC’'C C-AC. ■ Saa SK ttC5-'>A* C •OA^*a O •,A«» A . AN CtC » C v> I-AC,. B UOAMAH rC».NA . »CBAC" am * ^ASIA OAAO* . c'*’*c* C an OCAAO n c AN - BCAcCS •DCC ** -'I.A*« Ov' c •• - mO**** . mcnan .S M C**AC,. A AOBCA*SCS . »A A 3AA* jAPr A aC»4NCMr *mO«a 5 »• n CA vCA • mANNON • mcCam » A'C^JC 1. L C A HAASf j-A'S*OA»<CA ^ -a PA-ST m^. SmAAON w BPCNNA MAP aA* '^ANAOA k *^AU - MO**** -• a Can C n w^ am c aA r».*«, .• -0*«N , j-CArCNMAOC** •'AN’C . #■ *09S ma Ua a M'wA iA .0*-N A *•’!... .AMCl ■ mAA^'N 4MOMAS ^ 8C*“OoB M.CHAfw J BM iTm ACNA t #r kCONC r«CDCP>CA A. n A wBCA 02 maav C ^09 lOACN a . B'NOCB Reply tD Bloomington COuNBCk wCNOCLL A. AMOCABON Cmaac CB a pCA vC* «OSCA** a«T*B • iCMAAo A. Noaoa*c OAVIO ACAf September 17, 1991 f ^ y< U U I «.«. ^ALSO AOHirrto A k-“ ' •'piSCOMS' CSCNO JW'. Mr. Jim Moorse City Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323-0066 SEP, 1 8 W91- Re: Police Contract Our File No.: 14,422-03 Dear Mr. Moorse: I have in hand your letter of Sep'.ember 12, 1991, that was received in our office later in the afternoon of September 13, 1991. The City has asked me to respond to your letter in detail. 1. Factual Background i iililiililp'r memo dated July 2, 1990, from Mr. Melvin Kilbo, City of Police, to the Long Lake City Council he states that Part of this (cost) overrun is a direct result of the investigation of the two arson cases in Long Lake. Another reason for the regular salary overrun was a communication problem in that shifts where the Long Lake officer was off duty due to vacation, sick leave, etc., were covered by an officer on straight time, causing coverage to be worked and charged to Long Lake as straight time. This procedure has been corrected. M:: ► . <V..’ '■Ir-r Laukin . IIoi tman . D aia Ox I.in d* iiv ’i;s. I i d Mr. Jim Moorse September 17, 1991 Page 2 _______________ ^ AIn a letter dated October 3, 1990, Mr. Bernhardson responds Mr. Vande Vegte’s letter by arguing an overtime compensation analysis. By letter dated January 22, 1991, from the undersigned to Mark Bernhardson, the City again raised the issue of the 1989 billing stating that if the work performed is within the level of services covered by Paragraph 3 of the contract, the City should not be charged the additional $13,408.00. Nearly two months later, Mr. Bernhardson by letter dated March 12, 1991, responded to my letter regarding the police contract by attaching another memo from Chief Kilbo. Thereafter, on April 21, 1991, Mayor Swartwood wrote to Mark Bernhardson asserting that the City of Long Lake had budgeted $239,215.00 for the police budget because it had objected to the preliminary budget of $270,000.00 given to it by Chief Kilbo. By letter dated May 7, 1991, the undersigned wrote Mark Bernhardson raising the 1989 billing issue again and asking for a specific response. Thereafter, I attended a meeting With Mark Bernhardson, Melvin Kilbo and City Attorney Tom Barrett in which we discussed, among other things, the police contract. During the course of that meeting, the City of Orono discussed the 1989 billing as an overtime issue. Another meeting was held on July 23, 1991, to resolve issues regarding the police contract. The 1989 billing was again discussed as an overtime issue. As a result of that meeting, I requested that the City detail for us the factual basis for the overtime charges. The City of Orono indicated that they would provide me with the factual information including the cause of the scheduling problem as soon as possible. By letter dated July 24, 1991, I sent a letter to John Gerhardson, City of Orono, confirming the discussions of our meeting of July 23, 1991. On August 29, 1991, I wrote a letter to Mr. Gerhardson asking for a response to my letter of July 24, 1991. Since that time the City has chosen not to respond to our request except to make statements to the press that appear on their face to be incDnsistent with the meetings and discussions that we have had with City staff. For example, Mr. Ed Callahan is quoted in the Sailor, September 4, 1991, as follows; He said negotiations about the police payments has stalled, and current negotiations over the police contract for 1992 is being mired by "Long Lake's desire to talk philosophically about how we should run our police department. Larkin. IIoitman'. I)ai.^' >N I.in ix• i.ri> Mr. Jim Moorse September 17, 1991 Page 3_ _ _ _ _ _ A review of the correspondence to date reflc :ts that the City a£ Long Lake has requested a meeting to negotiate the 1992 police contract which has not been responded to by the City of Orono. If talks are Stalled it is because Orono has not provided the factual information regarding the scheduling problem that resulted in the 1989 overtime billing and has ignored our requests to negotiate the 1992 police contract. 2. 1989 Billing In summary, the City of Long Lake has remaining concerns regarding the 1989 billing. Is this billing for regular time, or overtime? If it is for regular time, it is a result of errors in communication by the City of Orono as reflected in Chief Kilbo's letter? Please provide us with the base budget and additional manpower budget for the City of Orono so we have a means to look at the budget in its totality. The City of Long Lake remains willing to pay a portion of this billing to resolve the dispute. However, we need to have answers to our long-standing questions before we are able to resolve this matter. 3. 1991 Contract It is my understanding that the City of Long Lake has made timely quarterly payments for the police contract at its budgeted amount of $239/000.00. I understand that those quarterly payments are current We appreciate your response to our request to reduce the budgeted amount. Please clarify the hourly reduction of the part-time officer. In other words, how many hours is he assigned to Long Lake presently? 3. 1992 Police Co. -ract As we have stated in our letters of July 24 and August 29, 1991, we desire to sit down with Orono to negotiate in good faith a 1992 police contract. Please respond to our letters in this regard as soon as possible. As you know, the deadline is October 1, 1991. Sincerely^ Christopher J.^ietzen, for LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, Ltd. bh cc: Betsy Swartwood, Mayor LuVerne Hanson [ CJD:RU7s ■ 919? I .o r i f p' I’-I- #I- r-'^' i-^h ■ At b i: %. TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator I / September 19, 1991 ^ <5? % Op * •/**>- / i SOBJBCT: Fire Service Provision Alternatives At the September 9, 1991 Council meeting I was directed to undertake an analysis of alternatives to the provision of fire services by the City of Long Lake. The oojectives identified as the basis for analyzing alternatives are as follows: 1. Ability to ensure high quality service. 2. Ability to ensure cost effective service. 3. Ability to ensure resonable response times. 4. Effective administ»'ation of the service. The following is a preliminary analysis of several alternatives: 1. Retain current contract with Long Lake Advantages: a. Is currently in place b. Provides reasonable response times to a large portion of Orono Disadvantages: a. Lack of managerial control b. Continuing contract administration problems c. Concerns regarding Orono's share of the budget 2. Revise the current contract with Long Lake to include service standards and contract administration standards and a reasonable cost sharing formula. Advantages: 1. No need to change arrangements with other cities 2. The contract can provide for some indirect managerial control through the operation or performance standards 3. Contract standards could improve the administration of the contract Disadvantage 1. It is que cionable whether the major items in this alternative could actually be implemented 3. Request that the other cities currently providing fire services to Orono expand their services to cover more of the city. 1 N ^■1f-P R-/ t/.. t ■- ■ f' t ^.i [i- f Advantages: 1. If these services are expanded enouah to elinninate the need fc. Long Lake to provide fire services it would eliminate the current problems related to the Long Lake contra^^t. Disadvantages: 1. Response times would be longer 2. This may require an additional fire station to be bui It 3. The other cities may not be able to extend fire service cost effectively 4. Joint powers agreement with several cities for fire service provision. Advantages: 1. Provide size efficiencies 2. Cities have joint control of the service provision Disadvantages: 1. There is less managerial control than if the city operated its own department 2. The other cities may not want to give up their own control to join a joint powers group 5, Start an Orono Fire Department Advantages: 1. The City would he total managerial control 2. If this requited a new fire station it could be located in a more central location Disadvantages: 1. Large start up costs a. possible fire station b. equipment c. staffing These are the major alternatives I have been able to identify. If there are other alternatives, they can be added to the list. I will then conduct a more detailed analysis of each of the alternatives. irurn • >■ $ t Z'' zz 6 TO: DATE: Mayor Peterson and City Coun: 1 Ron Moirse, City Administrai -r^'-'^^^ ■y %r<s> .? ^V> September 19r 1991 / SUBJECT: Resolu*-.on Regarding Bond.nj fur the City Facilities Through the HRA The City Attorney has indicated that the eyuijtions requiring a resolution regarding bonding for the city futilities through the HRA have been withdrawn. The nttorney's opinion is that the resolution is no longer required. Tom Barrett will address this issue at the Council meeting. i- Fr 4-r m 919?:.5 4i Mayor Peterson and City CouncilTO: FROM: DATS: SUBJECT: Financing for tne New City Facilities 7 C/.^ /■ Ron Moorse, City Administrator ^ /-•’ September 19, 1991 > % ’•o ♦ f ^ The following is a preliminary schedule of tasks related to the bond sale for the new city facilities: 1. September 23 - 27 - Carolyn Drude will meet with the bond counsel (Dorsey Whitney) regarding the drafting of the documents needed for che lease/purchase agreement for the construction of the city facilities. She will also work with them to develop a check list of documents needed and a schedule for completion of the documents. 2. October 10 - Determine the bond sale amount. This requires an estimate of the total project cost and a determination of the amount of the building fund reserve to be used to fund the project. 3. Octooer 14 - Both the Council and the HRA adopt resolutions calling for the sale of the bonds. 4. November 12 - Tentative bond sale date. m,• h h'r' |- It. ■ ‘■V. %r % "j/ 92091.2 % TO: PROM: DATS: Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator /y'/"* • / e September 23, 1991 ‘c> SUBJECT: Amendment to Resolution #3039 Attached is Resolution #3009 related to renewal Michael Hilbelink at 2180 Prospect Avenue. The for payment of $6,963.84 in expenses incurred result of hazardous ouilding action against the amount. $4,200 is the actual cost of building The remainder are legal costs. The owner of questioned the amount of legal costs and settlement of the issue which includes payment actual costs plus 1/2 of the legal fees. of variances for resolution calls by the City as a property in this demolition, etc. the property has has proposed a of the $4,200 in It is staff's recommendation that the settlement prof. ,»al be accepted as an alternative to incurring further legal costs. V' ' ^ . ■ I . o o CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.22 Zt A RBSOLDTION GRANTING renenal variances to municipal zoning code SECTION 10.28, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) FILE #1666 WHEREAS, Michael Hilbelink (hereinafter . .______^ rs.-rtrsia-r-hV loiated at the appllcant-i has an'interest in the property Prospect Avenue within the City of Orono (herein i and legally described as follows: Refer to Exhibit A attached (hereinafter "the property"); and WRPRBAS the aDolicant has aoolied to the City for variances to Hunfc'ipll 2o"n!n, Code Section 10.28. Subdivisron 5 (B) to permit the construction of a Icre^s where 21 consists of 22,490 square feet or .516 acres wnere acres is required and a side/street setback variance that would place the structure 41' instead of the required 50 . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota; FINDINGS 1, This application was reviewed as Zoning File #16co. con-uAsUOUS land. The property consists of 22,490 square £e or .516 acres. 3. The Orono Planning Commission on July 15, 1991 and recommended approval of the rene a variance application as proposed based upon the following findings; A) The property consists of .516 acres and is subject to 2 acre zoning standards. B) The area of the property is consistent surrounding one half three-quarter acre pattern of development within the Crystal Bay neighborhood. The property is served with sewer. Pace 1 of 4 ^04^o o V- t VesBO^"^ CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.■; C' ■" 2 D) There is no additional area available for acquisition to increase the building envelope. 4 The City Council has considered this includinq the findings and reconunendations of the Planni g rVorts b^y City staff, and the effect of the proposed variance on the he safety and welfare of the community. 5 The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally Lher nrooerty in this zoning district? that granting the variance^would not adversely affect traffic llaht air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to ^nrr nronertv would not merely serve as a clnv’.^ie^ce^to'ihe^pp/icant^^^^^ is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or "^j^^cant? and SoulYbe L^kelping^Sit^thrs^rit and intent of the Sioning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLOSlONSf ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above* the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to "instruct^ rode Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the construction of^ a single family residence ^^‘^uiring approval o. an ar variance of 64,630 square feet or 1.4 acres at 74's ana a setback variance of 9* or 18%, subject to .he .oilow.ng conditions: hazardous building action against this proper Y* B. Applicant shall provide proof of ^ County for all delinquent real ®®tate taxes, special assessments and penalties due on C. Re°v“ed' survey locating all drainage easements and drainage and utility easements. All land alterations final site plan and located out of 15 drainage easement area along north boundary of property. Page 2 of 4 // • j)/ o o *9-4 ^ •f • - ❖ • > A. •. ' - ^7 !• ^ s •-> I S ^ CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3 0 0 -_________ 2. New driveway access at Briar Street must j i ^ing Public Works Director prior to the issuance o permit. 3. Connection to municipal sewer prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for new residence. 4 Applicant or future owner shall maintain erosion control nn th?s property throughout construction to prevent ani restrictions'^upon drainage feet drainage easement along northern this easement The existing drainage swale located within this , stl^l n“”e novea /urther north so as to further^encroach into the immediately adjacent property to the no-t. 5. City Engineer to review final new construction prior to issuance of a building permit. 6 Authorities aranted by this resolution run with the property not with \he applicant, but are /rmit Sust be exercised by application within one year of the date of variance will expire on that date (August 26, 1992). 7. Violation of or non-compliance with any of ^"'2 conditions of this variance shall constitute a the zoning code, shall automatically terminate anv authority granted hlrsin, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 8 The undersigned applicant has read, ®i? h;reby agrees to Ihe te^s of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and of to the recording of this resolution in the chain of titl the property. Adopted by ♦•he City Council of the City °^.°tono, Minnesota at . regular meeting held on the 26th day of August, 1991. bthy M^iallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Edward J. Ca^ahan, Jr., Acting Mayor roperty Owner(s)Page 3 of 4 0 I- & r t V o o f . ^ ■ - >. 0^ CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. -_________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) *■ Edward J. Callahan. Jr. Acting .Mayor The foregoing instrument was acknowledged 4.W4 of AuQUSt, 1991, by s Dorothy M*'^Hallin,^Mayo^r fi City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behal. of the City. LISDA S. VEE notary public • MINNESOTA '*® HENNEPIN COUNTY 'yrl^L^ Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS On this before me a No appeared .. 19sZ within and' £^r said county, personally /yi,%rr'i~kO^appeared - -dj/cAbed in and who executed theknown to me to be the person(s) ‘^escrioea in a executed foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he itney; e the same as his (their) free act and deed. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ~7 7, ISS5 } ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) before me a Notary Public tllht' county, personally me to be the person(s) foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that - y the same as his (their) free act and deed. 199 NOTARY FIBLIC Page 4 of 4 r^iLoOL^ - - - w J 'j . '-i' EXHIBIT A T.TgfiAl. DESCRIPTION; All that part of the Northeast Quarter of Ouarter of Section 10, Township 117 North, Range 23 West the 5th Princinal Meridian described as follows* Beginning at Mint on the west ^ of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest oStrter of sa^i Section 10 515.625 feet north the southwest corner of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 130.00 feet; thence East 208.00 feet; thence South 13 . feet; thence west 208.00 feet to the point of beginning. ir: V' •fK'b I t .':V- 91991.4 // % TO: FROM: DATE: /?/ O',■9f / Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator September 19# 1991 SOBJECT: Council Work Session Concerning the Stubbs Bay Sewer project I .* The feasibility report for the Stubbs Bay sewer project has been completed. The Council has indicated a public meeting will be held on Ocotober 14, 1991, to provide information to the public regarding the project. It may be helpful to the Council to meet with the Engineer and staff prior to the 14th to review the report. Monday, October 7th is currently an open evening. It may work best to meet at 5:00 p.tn. if all Counci Imembers are able to attend. ■i.. ............. I 1.- II I I I I I >■•I I I ^ I I K I I r-:I fy I ri k I 'V;I I I' V ;/ DRAFT Report Stubbs Bay Sanitary Sewer Improvements Orono, Minnesota August 1991 File No. 13937 m TH Bonestroo Rosene Anderilk ft Associates Englnceri 4 Architects St. Paul, MInne seta X-. t Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Ooo G BonnODO ftobfn W HDiene Pf Jospp^ C A/xJerWt. PE Mafvir L ScyvaLa PE Ricnafd E Terser PE Oienn R Cook. PE Thomas E Noy^s PE Rboen G Schonjch* PE SoV9T M Ebrrtir C P A Engineers S Architects iCMh A Gevdoo PE R<rvan3 W Fo«er P£ Donald C BurgaidL PE je»ry A Boi/nao^^ PE Ma^ic A Haniori PE Ted k PE M<riae» T R^utmanr PE (aooe»s R p^^Uffie PE Dav>d O UJSkota PE T*xxnas A' Aptervyi PE Mcnaei C Lynch PE James R Maiand PE Kenneth P Anden<y> Pf Mart R RbRs PE tooen C Russen A i A Thomas E Angus PE mowwjko a SarAyd PE Daniel J Edgerron PE A Srsi Tt J Casvvra PE smaei Martme/ PE Mart D \A/Wtv PE fhomjs R Anderson A / A C ary E Rytarorr p E Mses B Jensen PE L Ph*p G'ave* <« Pf «pne C PHanan, A • A ^nes M Rng A iC P Jerry D Pprtzjch PE CecAo Ovner PE RdCen R Drebioyy Pf Gary O' Monen PE Kaier* L \Acmen P£ Kech R vjpp PE haries A Enctson M Pavvefsty Hd»!an M 0»son August 26, 1991 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Orono Box 66 Crystal, Minnesota 55323 Re: Stubbs Bay Sanitary Sewer Improvements Our File No. 13937 Dear Mayor and Council: Transmitted herewith is the Report on Sanitary' Sewer Improvements in the Stubbs Bay area of the City of Orono. The City has involved the residents of the area in planning discussions over the past seven years in an effort to develop a plan for providing sanitary sewer service. Tliis report is a ■ miU of the input received and provides an update of the 1984 Stubbs Bay Report. We wool, bfc pleased to convenient. ass this report further with the City Council at any mutually Respectfully submitted, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook, P.E. GRC:lk I hereby certify that this report was prepaied by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Registereo Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.. Glenn R. Cook, P.E. Date: August 26. 1991 Reg. No. 9451 13 im VMtt MgTMWRy 36 • St. PMil, Minnesota 55113* 6l2-636^«600 • 3Sth Anniversary I .v'.I I I IL I I I K- - 1:^I I I I f-' s':'.I ‘I '}■ t. i I I I ^'-'I I rir' •"■■•"" TABLE OF CONIENTS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TABLE OF CONTENTS * DUCTION SSION COST ESTIMATES ASSESSMENTS CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDA'l K )NS APPENDIX A - DETAILED COST ES TIMA fl-S FIGURE I STUBBS BAY SEWER SYS I EM FIGURE II - STUBBS BAY SEWER SYS J EM FlGU*“b :n - SEWER SERVICE AREA 13937 i w. . . t. ’ ♦ PA&E NOt 1. 2. 3. j». 7. 8. 9. M fAll- .-r.- .1 j5,II I I h{;-. ■ . - I I I I (y-P\. rIm ^>4Ihh' h • i^V:‘ I rI ‘-’vt ' ♦ I I I 1^- • 5v b'I INTRODLCnON The City Council has requested this report to determine the feasibility of constructing sanitary sewer improveinents in the Stubbs Bay Area. Many homeowners in the Stubbs Bay area have experienced problems with their on-sitc systems. The lots in the area are generally small and it is difficult to provide suitable area tor replacing the failing systems. The soils are primarily clay with a high water table experienced in many areas. There arc presently nine drainfields in the area within three teet ot the water table and twelve systems arc within 50 feet of the lakeshore or Stubbs Bay C'reek. It is estimated that 28 percent of the existing systems could not be repaired or replaced within the existing City code requirements. There is another 22 percent r)i the existing systems that are severely limited or it is questionable that they could be repaired or replaced within the City code requirements. The "Stubbs Bay Alternative Waste Management Plan" prepared by Mike G&ffron reviews several methods ot providing sewer serx'ice to the area. The report concludes that municipal sanitary sewer service is the most desirable alternative. There are other systems that will work as a temporary solution, but the majority of the lots will benefit the most over a long time period by construction of municipal sewer. The most desirable method of correcting .he problem is to provide a central collection system which would discharge into the existing City sewage system on Tonkowa Road. The Stubbs Bay area is divided into seven Service Areas (Figure 1) for purposes of this report. The separation of the project into service areas was done to allow certain critical parts of project to be constructed without the need to complete all parts at this time. It is exp>ected - 3 • k.II k. 0k' ifc-f' •i' that all parts of the project identified in this report will t,::.ina(ely be served with sanitary sewer. The City has reviewed the possibility of obtaining outside funding to a.ssist in the project and thereby minimize the indixidual property assessment. There are no outside funding sources currently available for financing projects of this type. 13937 -4- .... .. <Kt, •j* < V' DISCUSSION The sanitary sewer system in the Stubbs Bqr ■I'ca has Ixren into seven k ^ t '• k Service Areas (Fiem e 1) for purposes of this repoit The sanitary sewer Maet are identified I-" ’P as Trunks and l.neMl-s to provide an equitable method of sharing project CQlti. The trunk I’v lines would be all st iver lines that serve more than one sev^cr service am. Several line segments in me piuttni area serve a trunk and literal function and cocta are Iplit to reflect I’ A benetil. ^ ^ would consist of all lift statiooiand Force Main liim required. There V- ' !■ * ■ are three lilt stations that would serve the Stuhlie Bay Area. The trunk line would also Ilf include several g- oiiy line segments shown on Figure 2 and 3 at the buck nf this report. I - ■ Vf - V *' ‘ i *“ Tire lateral lines would include all remaining gravity lines segments dutt provide sewer 'll:. ^service to the lots. % The sewer service areas that have the grerttot need are Stubbs Bqr Nonhwest (Part ■ I'' |S|5 I), Stubbs Bay Nimheast (Part II), and Baysidc Brat (Part 111). The lots inthera three areas small and the al^ty to repair or CvtoBnct new on site system 4l limited. The ■ 'i liS: Stubbs Bay Nortliwcst area (Part I) would be servedDy construction of aBfcmiion on West K <1; Uike Street and a force main to Tonkowa Road and the existing system. The trunkyiateral TiVf I,/ 1t'V'i'W,' -i i;,V: .F line would be e.xtendcd north along West Latin Street to .Bayfide Bflndl Md then east i t - ■ V a 2.tKM) feel lo serve adjacent propet^f. There are 26 boom li thi Stubbs Bay ; Northwest area whivh uuuld be served bv the iiiuvafvcnient* 0m ' ' . -r- , \r 1, v-f -V:-wmm 0-,'.. •T. The Stubbs Bay Northeast area and Bayside East area would be served hg construction of a lift station near the intersection of Bayside Bond and Tonka Avehue. T!ie force main mm\I • ** -5- gssaisataS'-as^^ i II I I I I I r, fei‘ ^4 I I S’-Iw I l . r r K‘I I i 4Vv liI# CLA!_. .m^i iKi • iC-" ■• »■ • - IV I rir i . l‘..;-4f"I I ♦ ■“ k . would be constructed from the lift station to the easterly manhole in Part 1. The report provides for an alternate alignment for the force main wliich would follow the Luce Line Trail. There are 45 homes in the Stubbs Bay Northeast area and 12 homes in the Bayside East area which would be served by the improvement. The remaining Service areas can be provided with sanitary sewer service at this time if requested by the property owners. It is proposed that the majority of the trunk facilities would be included in the project at this time. The lift station Lir Bedewotxl and the trunk line for Cygnet Place would not be constructed until the areas wish to have sewer service. The project will generally be constructed witliin the right-of-way of existing streets, but the alignment selected will require some permanent easements and a number of temporary easements to allow construction. Permits from Hennepin County, the DNR, the PCA, and MWee will be required. The streets disturbed during construction will be replaced with 8 inches of Class 5, 100 percent crushed and 3 inches of 2341 bituminous surfacing. The boulevards and easements win be sodded and the area disturbed along the Luce Line Trail and county right-of-way will be seeded. The lemoval of several trees along the right-of-way and on required easements will be necessary to facilitate construction of the sewer line. 13937 - 6 - >•* • —k II 'f'I I I I I I I I 1&9}^ ^,. wI I Ir- h i 1^; :E)- I COST ESTIMATES Cost estimates have been prepared for the extension of sanitary sewer in the Stubbs Bay area. The summary of project costs are provided in this section with detailed cost estimates for the work described presented in the appendices at the back of this report. The estimates for the work are based on anticipated unit prices for the 1991 construction season (ENR 4770). gojl estimates presented below include a five percent allowance for contingencies and a 25 percent allowance for project design administration, bonding capitalized interest and legal costs. Project costs Sanitaiy Sewer Trunk Sanitary Sewer Lateral Stubbs Bay Northwest (Part 1) Stubbs Bay Northeast (Part II) Bayude East (Part III) Bederwood (Part IV) Bayside North (Part V) Oxford (Part VI) cygnet Place (Part VII) $ 830,090 $ 157,190 283,335 54,480 132,460 43,300 74,870 369.250 Total Sanitary Sewer Lateral Total Project Cost $1,114,885 $1,944,975 There are three lift stations required to complete the trunk sewer system. The lated operation and maintenance cost for lift station 1 (West Lake) is $4,850.00, lift Station 2 (East Lake) is $4,700.00, and Uft Station 3 (Bederwood) is $4,500.00. H111 . 7 - -7 : ■ nm ASSESSMENTS The project costs as outlined are proposed to be assessed to the adjacent property Irased on benefit received. It is proposed to assess a trunk charge to all units in the Stubbs Bay Service Area. The lateral cost would be levied as a connection charge to residents when they connect to the sewer line. The project costs were established with the concept of acfving the Stubbs Bay Northwest and Stubbs Bay Northeast areas as phase 1 of the project. The other parts of the project would be constructed when more than 50% of the property owners requested that the work be done. The proposed assessments for each portion of the project would be as follows: Sanitary Sewer Trunk Assessment Total Trunk Cost (see Pg. A-21) Number of Units Trunk Cost per unit $830,090 135 $ 6,150 Sanitary Sewer Lateral No. of Lateral Cost Trunk Cost Total Cost £aa I Service Area Cost Units Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit Stubbs Bay N.W.$157,190 26 $ 6,050 $6,150 $12,200 u Stubbs Bay N£.283.335 45 6,300 6,150 12,450 m B^fside East 54,480 12 4,540 6,150 10,650 IV Bederwood Bayside North 132,460 43,300 11 4 12,040 10,830 6,150 6,150 18,190 1A ofinV VI Oxford 74,870 9 8,320 6,150 14,470 vn cygnet PI 369,210 29 12,730 6,150 18,880 13937 -8- 1 f-' 'V, The portions of the project that are recommended for construction at this time are Parts I, II, A IIL The project costs for Part I, II & III Lateral and Trunk would be as follows: Liiteral Trunk loial Stubbs Bay N.W. • Part 1 $157,190 $138,820 $ 2%,010 Stubbs Bay N.E. - Part II 283,335 109,290 392,625 Bi^^e East • Part 111 54.480 56,150 110,630 Lift Station 1 - West Lake Street 149,830 149,830 Lift Station 2 - East Lake Street 183.750 183.750 Total Phase 1 $495,005 $637,840 $1,132,845 Construction of the project would initiate a trunk assessment for all property in the sewer district There are 13S units that would generate a trunk fee of $830,250. The lateral costs could be assessed to the benefiting property owners or paid as a connection charge. If other sections of the project elect to have laterals constructed in their areas these costs would also be assessed or paid as a connection charge 13937 -9- vrr AI I I I I I I I 1 %■' '■1 - - ■>•*■-.I ■ '-a.'V- r ii' *'ife#' I •>wf fev': , ■; ■' —m & ■'■I J ;>.'•; .1“,^ - 4-; rONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The proposed improvements described in this report arc feasible as they relate to general engineering principals and construction procedures. Fhe following recommendations, based on data in this report, are presented for the City Councils consideration. 1. The City of Orono adopt this report as a guide for the installation of sanitary sewer in the Stubbs Bay area. 2. The City conduct a legal and fiscal review ot t'.ie proposed project prior to the public hearing. Easement acquisition be reviewed with property owners prior to the public hearing. A public hearing be held to determine what further action is to be taken. The land owners in the assessment area description should be notified for hearing purposes. The total estimated project cost of $1,944,975. should be incorporated in the public notice. 3. 4. 5. The project schedule should be followed if the project is to proceed. I The (voperty owners will be required to pay a SAC lee of $600.00 plus the connection the home to the sewer main. It is anticipated that the private connection charge will be appraodmately $1,500 for the average lot. The property proposed to be assessed for the sanitary sewer improvements within the Sewer Service Areas is shown on Figures 2 and 3 at the back of this report. - 10- UtiM % ii^-:IO f ' *. I iA..i The prope rty to be atteiicd » kx-atci* m ih« North West '<• Townhip 1I7N, Rai^ 23 W, Herirtcpin County Minne^na. He ibiowl^ k • leiiUtivc tchedute for planning purptacs Kcpuri Holi PWMIc Hevtr.g •ad S{ TV (icattDfis of section 4 and ScctKm 5. '&■ ? '■ i?' < i- fe- I- ' .-r If Bitmw- f..W Mkw ’QK iPf , 9:",;mmi Sm W^Vui-:: I ' ■ ^ Fi\ ■ ft"' mm Approver BMi A Sprt llk Receive Ekli Sriiy D«i HoM iuai !UI# • Amm4 CV ntnM (OiP||lHt Ctmm\t€tmm ................... it^XAA; f • V , -"'y V >---1 •'.-W-'^,~jr -.aiCin ------. September 9, 1991 November 25, 1991 Nvjvcmber 25. 1991 Janiiikry 14. 1992 February 15. 1992 March tl. 1992 Afed 22, 1992 Apra 29. 1992 AuguN MK 1992 1 f;II .5^. ' I I B'--I Is’; i. I I •t- I rr Ip/.. -"7 ■isisfe»mv' -> ;Wi:1 f' W" V •/ IfI Ss I-: Pl,mI i^vl-, Iiife. 'i'ii,^^••■. - ■ I 1^-??!-■ 1m(* > 13937app A-1 APPENDIX A DETAILED COST ESTIMATE PART I . STIJRBS BAY NORTHWEST SANITARY SEWER 680 LF 8" PVC, 8’-10 ’ deep (a $18.00/1.1.$ 12,240.00 880 LF 8" PVC, 10 ’-ir deep @ $21.(K)/l.f.18,480.00 44S LF 8" PVC, 12’-14 ’ deep @ $23.00/1.f.10,235.00 815 LF 8" PVC. 14 ’-16’ deep @ $26.00/l.f.21,190.00 150 LF 8" PVC 16’-18’ deep @ $32.(H)/1.f.4,800.00 18 EA Manhole @ $l,200.(K)/each 21,600.00 75 LF Manhole overdepth (s $100.00/1.1.7,500.00 15 Lf 8" DIP, outside drop $100.00/l.f.1,500.00 100 U*Jack casing for 8" PVC (d‘ $150.tK),1in.tt 15,000.00 26 EA Ser’iCe wye branch @ $50.00/ea.1,300.00 510 LF 4" CISP service pipe @ $15.00/l.f.7,650.00 LF Improved Pipe Fnd. 6” Increment $2.00/1.f. Subtotal 12.000.00 $133,495.00 + 5% Contingency 6.675.00 Total Construction $140,170.00 ■h 25% Legal, Eng. & Adminih.3S.Qlft00 Total Est. Cost Sanitary Sewer, Part 1 $175,200.00 ■ jV^A 1^ & 3,0 3,0 14 65 25 1.0 RATION CY li ' Xi ■-■-■■ :' '* '- l»37apf> TN TN TN EA SY AC APPENDIX A fCONT’Dl DETAILED COST ESTIMATE PART 1 - STUBBS BAY NORTHWEST Common excavation (a $5.lK)/cu.yd. Class 5 (100% crushed) (n* $8.00/ton 2341 bituminous mix @ $18.00/ton AC-1 bituminous material for mix @ S 150.00/ton Tree removal @ $100.00/ea. Sod with topsoil @ $3.00/sq.yd. Seed with topsoil @ $3,000.0()/acre Subtotal + 5% Contingency Subtotal •¥ 25% Legal, Eng. & Adminis. Total Est. Cost Restoration, Part I Total Project Cost - Part 1 Trunk Credit (Pg. A-16) Lateral Cost - Part I A-2 $ 15,000.00 24.000. 00 19,800.00 9.750.00 2.500.00 18.000. 00 3,000.00 $ 92,050.00 4.600i» $ 96,650.00 24.16a00 $120,810.00 $296,010.00 13R820.00 $157,190.00 1 '.v,W^ .mi r APPENDIX A fCQNTD^ DFTAII ED COST ESTIMATE PART II • STUBBS BAY NORTHEAST SANITARY SEWER 780 1,400 615 675 280 20 80 5 100 45 ►Ml 13937app LF LF LF LF LF EA LF LF LF EA LF LF 8" PVC, 0’-8' deep @ $16.00/1.1. 8" PVC, 8’-10’ deep (a $18.001.1. 8" PVC, 10’-12’ deep Cq $21.00/1.1. 8" PVC, 12’-14’ deep (a $23.00/l.f. 8" PVC, 14’-16’ deep @ $26.00.1.f. Manhole @ $ 1,200.00/each Manhole overdepth (S $l(X).00/l.f. 8' DIP, outside drop $50.001.1. Jack casing for 8" PVC (a $150.001.1. Service wye branch @ $50.U0/ea. 4" CISP service pipe @ $l5.001.f. Improved pipe fnd.in 6" Increments (q $2.00/l.f. Subtotal + 5% Contingency Subtotal + 25% Legal, Eng. & Adrainis. Total Estiamted Cost, San. Sewer, Part II A-3 $ 12,480.00 25.200.00 12.915.00 15.525.00 7.280.00 24.000. 00 8,000.00 500.00 15.000. 00 2.250.00 13.500.00 12.000. 00 $145,150.00 $152,400.00 38100.00 $190,500.00 F % ^I¥ I I I I I r-'-t. ^'I 1st. , J •-■ s I I -r- I t—1I ■ I i 1^^-; ■ 1;I I !*:u^v ^i‘y ;'-'v. F I Mv trv ■ :'v;I It'’_VJ'-TT ff- RF.yrORATION 3,600 CY 5.600 2,300 120 10.600 TN TN TN S\ 13937app lS, APPENDIX A (CONT^D^ DETAILED COST ESTIMATE PART II - STUBBS BAY NORTHEAST Ccuunon excava? on & $5.00/cu.yd. Qass 5 (100% crushed) <tt- $8.00/ton 2341 bituminous mix @ $ 18.00/ton AC-1 bituminous material for mix @ $150.00/ton Sod with topsoil @ $3.(X)/sq.yd. Total Estimated Construction Cost + 5% Contingency Subtotal + 25% Legal, Eng. & Adminis. Total Est. Cost, Restoration, Part II Total Part II Trunk Credit (Pg. A* 17) Total Lateral Cost - Part II A-4 $ 18,000.00 44.800.00 41.400.00 18,000.00 3L800.QQ $154,000.00 7.700.00 $161,700.00 401425.00 $202,125.00 $392,625.00 109.290.00 $283,335.00 ... . : V:^fe-I r-I b- I I I P>' ■r¥I ;v'p: [■;:'3 m- h: ■r : . I I I?lv _____r fk w-..'■ I ■V APPENDIX A K ONT’D) DETAILED COST ESTIMATE PART III - BAY.SDE EAST SANITARY SEWER 400 500 500 200 6 20 12 240 13937tpp IF LF IP LF EA LF EA LF LF 8" PVC, 8’-10’ deep (d' $18.(X)/l.f. 8” PVC, 10’-12’ deep (a $21.00/lf. 8” PVC, 12’-14 ’ dc -p (d $23.1H)/L1. 8" PVC 14-16' deep @ $26.(K)/1 f. Manhole @ $ 1,200.00/each Manhole overdepth (d $l(K).(X)/l.t. Service wye bran . (a $50.1MVea. 4" CISP service pipe rT $l5.1K)lf. Improved pipe fnd. 6" Increment (d $2.00/1.1'. Subtotal + 5% Contingency Total Construction •h 25% Legal, Eng. & Adminis. Total Est. Cost Sanitary Sewer, Part 111 A-5 S 7,200.00 10.500.00 11.500.00 5,200.00 7.200.00 2,000.00 600.00 3.600.00 8.400.0C $56,200.00 2.800.00 $59,000.00 14.750.00 $73,750.00 ■*-^**— *. ^ I W' li>ir' «N' Rl vrORATlON 2lH| HM) t) lUO 3,000 1.0 CY TN TN TN EA SY AC 13937app APPENDIX A ICONTD^ DETAILED COST ES riMATE PART 111 - BAYSIDE EAST Common excavation @ $5.00/cu.yd. Class 5 (100% crushed) @ $8.00/ton 2341 bituminous mix @ $22.00/ton AC-1 bituminous material for mix @ $ 150.00/ton Tree removal @ $100.00/ea. Sod with topsoil @ $3.00/sq.yd. Seed with topsoil @ $3,000.00/acre Total Estimated Construction Cost 5% Contingency Subtotal + 25% Legal, Eng. & Adminis. Total Est. Cost Restoration, Part 111 Total Project Cost - Part III Tnink Cred* (Pg. A-18) Total Lateral Cost • Part 111 A-6 $ 1,000.00 2,000.00 2,200.00 9oaoo 10,000.00 9,000.00 $ 28,100il0 $ 29,500.00 7Ja0.0Q $36,880.00 $110,630.00 $ 54,480.00 ffT:'-’- APPENDIX A (CONTD^ DETAILED COST ESTIMATE PART IV - BEDERWOOD SANITARY SE^ 540 LF 1,( 3< 1< 9 20 14 LF LF LF EA LF EA LF LF Sr PVC, 8’-10 ’ deep (o> $18.»K)/l.t. 8" PVC, 10 ’.ir deep (w 8" PVC, 12’-14’ deep @ $23.0()/l.f. r PVC, 14’-16’ deep @ $26 00/l.f. Manhole @ $1,200.00/each Manhole overdepth @ SlOO.OU/l.f. Service wye branch @ $50.00/ea 4" CISP service pipe @ $15.00/I.f. Improved pipe fnd. in 6 ” Increments @ $2.00/l.f. Subtotal •t- 5% Contingency Subtotal + 25% Legal, Eng. & Adminis. Total Est. Cost Sanitary Sewer, Part IV $ 9,720.00 21,000.00 6.900.00 2.600.00 10,800.00 2,000.00 700.00 4,200.00 $65,920.00 $69,220.00 17.300.00 $86,520.00 V, t m fen A-7 V . B'Ss' RESTORATION 350 20 50 1.0 CY TN TN TN EA SY AC APPENDIX A rCONTD^ pFTAII FD COST ESTIMATE PART IV ♦ BEDERWOOD Common excavation @ $5.00/cu.yd. Class 5 (100% crushed) @ $8.00/ton 2341 bituminous mix @ $18.00/U)n AC-1 bituminous material for mix @ $ 150.00/ton Tree removal @ $10().00/ea. Sod with topsoil (ip $3.00/sq.yd. Seed with topsoil $3,000.(K)/acre Subtotal + 5% Contingency Subtotal 25% Legal, Eng. & Adminis. Total Est. Cost Restoration, Part IV Total Part TV A-8 $ 1,500.00 7.200.00 6.300.00 3.000. 00 5.000. 00 9,000.00 3.00C $ 35,00( 1.750i» $ 36,75a00 9.19Q.QQ $ 45,940.00 $132,460.1 I'II I I I I I I; fe f I Ib , I I I sIi. i Mif.:-i ; m:. I11' •'i.^ •I'i I'lvl - Si-'I T 1 V. mm^: SANITARY SEWER 100 200 200 140 2 6 3 40 2,000 13937«pp LF LF LF LF EA LF EA LF TN APPENDIX A (CONT Dl DETAILED COST ESTIMATE PART V - BAYSIDE NORTH 8" PVC, 8’-10’ deep (a' $18.00/lf.$ 1,800.00 8" PVC, lO’-ir deep (a $21.00/l.f.4,200.00 8" PVC, ir-14* deep (a' $23.(Xm.4,600.00 8" PVC, 14 ’-16 ’ deep (a' $26.lK)/l.f.3,640.00 Manhole @ $ 1,200.00/each 2,400.00 Manhole overdepih (<i $100 (10/1.1’.600.00 Service wye branch (fi SSO.OO ea.150.00 4" CISP service pipe (a $15.00.I t.600.00 Improved Pipe Bedding 6" Inciements @ $2.00/l.f.4.000.00 Subtotal $21,990.00 -f- 5% Contingency 1.100.00 Subtotal $23,090.00 + 25% Legal. Eng. & Adminis.5.770.00 Total Est. Cost Sanitary Sewer, Part V $28,860.00 A-9 ■ • -** - _ i I<'V r'. *I I I 1^" ■ APPENDIX A (CONTD) DETAILED COST ESTIMATE PART V • BAYSIDE NORTH RESTORA1 50 0^ 1^937app A-10 usm EA Tree removal $100.00/ea.$ 5,000.00 SY Sod with topsoil @ $3.00/sq.yd 4,000.00 AC Seed with topsoil @ $3,0()0.(K)/acie 1.500.00 Subtotal $ 11,000.00 + 5% Contingency 550.00 Subtotal $ 12,550.00 + 25% Legal, Eng. & Adminis. Total Est. Cost Restoration, Part V $ 14,440.00 Total Part V $ 43,300.00 II f;.' I '*. ■ I 1:I I I I ' « I i* '■fli' I teS££.'-- i'i .! ■ t- APPENDIX A fCONTP) DETAILED COST ESTIMATE PART VI - OXFORD ROAD SANITARY SEWER 1,000 100 100 4 10 9 120 300 150 LF LF LF EA LF EA LF TN LF B1 RATION EA 5.(SY '3937«pp il'te. r PVC, 8’-10’ deep @ $18.00/l.f. 8" PVC, 10’-12’ deep (d $21.00,1.f. 8" PVC, 12’-14’ deep @ $23.00/l.f. Manhole @ $ 1,200.00/each Manhole overdepth @ $100.00/1.1. Service wye branch @ $50.00/ea. 4" CISP service pipe @ $15.00/lf. Rock stabilization @ $ 12.00/ton Auger 4" CISP set vice pipe (d $40.00/1.f. Subtotal + 5% Contingency Total Construction + 25% Legal, Eng. & \dminis. Total Est. Cost Sanitary Sewer, Part I Tree removal @ $100.00/ea. Sod with topsoil @ $3.00/sq.yd. Subtotal + 5% Contingency Subtotal + 25% Legal, Eng. & Adminis. Total Est. Cost Restoration, Part VI Total Project Cost - Part VI A-11 $ 18,000.00 2,100.00 2.300.00 4.800.00 1,000.00 450.00 1.800.00 3,600.00 6.000.00 $ 40,050.00 2.000.00 S 42,050.00 10.510.00 $ 52,560.00 2,000.00 15.000.00 $ 17,000.00 85000 $ 17,850.00 4.460.00 $ 22,310.00 $ 74,870.00 hf U- v;■>^. r f-. ^r:E''I I ii._iI h\If r9tv^*- :C'r ^I APPENDIX A DETAILED COST ESTIMATE PART VII - CYGNET PLACE SANITARY SEWER 200 19 90 5 60 29 860 13»7app LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF EA LF LF LF EA LF LF er PVC, 8’-10’ deep $1«.U0/If. PVC, 10’-12’ deep (a- $21.U0/lf. tr PVC, 12’-14’ deep @ $23.00,If. 8" PVC, 14’-16’ deep @ $26.00/U. r PVC, 16’-18’ deep @ $32.00/11. 8" PVC, 18’-20’ deep @ $34.W)/l.f. 8" PVC, 20’-22’ deep @ $36.00/l.f. Sr PVC, 22’-24’ deep @ $38.00/l.f. 8" PVC, 24’-26’ deep @ $40.00/l.f. 8“ PVC, 26’-28’ deep @ $44.00/l.f. 8" PVC, 28’-30’ deep @ $50.00/1.1. Manhole @ $1,200.00/each Manhole overdepth @ $100.U0/I.f. 8" DIP, outside drop $100.00/1.1. Jack casing for 8’ PVC @ $150.0<3/lin.ft Service wye branch @ $50.00/ea. 4** CISP service pipe @ $15.00/!.f. Improved Pipe End. 6" Increment @ $2.00/l.f. Subtotal + 5% Contingency Total Construction + 25% Legal, Eng. & Admit'is. Total Est. Cost Sanitary Sewer, Part I A-12 $ 7,200.00 8.400.00 9.200.00 15.600.00 19.200.00 20.400.00 14.400.00 15.200.00 8,000.00 8.800.00 10,000.00 22.800.00 9,000.00 500.00 9,000.00 1,450.00 12,900.00 $204,050.00 10^.00 $214,250.00 53.55Q.0O $267,800.00 r-E-n II I r I I 1 I W^' ■ m- ■hr--I:+* ’ '■f f.%w •T I r/ FI 1i! jr^'- ; ■- i >■ !?■’;' -■' ■ i', rr''v'aP' - f I j■I??. -''iIf I a 4; 6J X ICIi#ration CY 140 40 10 0937app•n.'- TN TN TN EA SY AC APPENDIX A fCONT D^ nPTAn FD COST ESTIMATE PART Vll . CYGNET PLACE Common excavation @ $5.00/cu.yd. Class S (100% crushed) @ $8.00/ton 2341 bituminous mix @ $ 18.00/ton AC-1 bituminous material for mix @ $ 150.00/ton Tree removal @ SlOO.OO/ea. Sod with topsoil @ $3.00/sq.yd. Seed with topsoil @ $3,000.00/acre Subtotal + 5% Contingency Subtotal •¥ 25% Legal, Eng. & Adminis. Total Est. Cost Restoration, Part 1 Total Project Cost - Part VII Trunk Credit (Pg. A-20) Lateral Cost - Part 1 A-13 11 Hi I I I IIM $ 22,500.00 54.400.00 45.000. 00 21.000. 00 4,1 18,1 6,000.00 $17a900.00 R550.00 $179,450.00 44.850.00 $224,300.00 HIM$4911 122. $369,210. J Sf., . *-. b- APPENDIX A (CONT’DI DETAILED COST ESTIMATE TRUNK SEWER EXTENSIONS I JUT STATION NO. I . WEST LAKE STREET 1,( 60 1 1 1 250 20 2 50 1,700 1.0 13937app LF 6” PVC force main @ $15.(X)/l.f. LF Jack 6” DIP force main & casing (a> $150.00/l.f. EA Connect 6" DIP force main into exbdng MH @ $500.00/ea. EA Air release MH @ $2,500.0()/ea. Lift Station No. 1 (iv $65,000.00/ea. Rock stabiliiation @ $ 12.00/ton Class 5 (100% crushed) @ $8.00/ton 2341 bituminous mixture @ $50.00/ton AC*1 bit. material fox mix @ $ 150.00/ton Ttee removal @ $100.00/ea. Sod wAopsoil @ $3.00/s.y. Seed w/topsoil @ $3,000.00/ac. $114,150.00 ■f 5% Contingencies Total Construction 25% Legal, Engineering & Admin. Total Estimated Cost Lift Station Nti. 1 EA TN TN TN TN EA SY Ac. A-14 $ 15,750.00 9,000.00 500.00 2.500.00 65,000.00 3.000. 00 4.000. 00 1.000. 00 300.00 5.000. 00 5.100.00 3.000. 00 5.710.00 $119,86a00 29.970.00 $149,830.00 i'IirIr S'I Kr I I I iv.;« ^:k X'*:I I. ‘ » ■. . I Si"' > 1I Ih: Vi •/• I i;"'" s I I'iI ►T' • ■ ^' «n I;v 5/-iI i I I - i 1 APPENDIX A fCONTD) nPTAn p.n cost estimate TRUNK SEWER EXTENSIONS IJPT STATION NO. 2 - EAST LAKE STREET 2^30 LF 4" DIP force main @ $15.00/l.f. 1 EA Cut 4" DIP into existing MH @ $500.00/ea. 3*000 LF Improved pipe Old. in 6 ” Increments @ $2.( EA Air release MH @ $2*500.00/ea. EA Lift station @ $60,000.00/ea. CY Common excavation @ $5.00/cu.yd. TN Class S (100% crushed) @ $8.00/ton TN 2341 bituminous mixture @ $ 18.00/ton TN AC-1 bit material fox mix @ $ 150.00/ton SY Sod wAopsoil @ $3.00/s.y. Ac. Seed wAopsofl @ |3,000.00/ac. Subtotal -t- 5% Contingencies Total Construction 25% Legal* Engineering & Admin. Total Estimated Cost Lift Station No. 2 1 1 500 800 325 20 1.0 13937app A-15 $ 38,250.00 500.00 6,000.00 2.500.00 60*000.00 2*500.00 6.400.00 5.850.0. 3.000. 00 12*000.00 $i4aooo.oo 7.000.00 $147,000.00 36.750.00 $183*750.00 -I H APPENDIX A (CONT D^ r FfTTIMATEAf>'lDFTAn Fi > TRUNK SEWER EXTENSIONS IIFT gTATIQN NO. 3 - REDERWOOD SO LF 4” DIP force main @ SlS.OO/I.f. 50 TN Rock stabilization @ $ 12.00/ton 1 EA lift Station @ $50,000.00/ea. 500 SY Sod with y topsoU @ $3.00/s.y. 13937app -f 5% Contingencies Total Construction 25% Legal* Engineering & Admin. Total Estimated Cost Lift Station No. 3 A-16 V«' . /vk*. i'. . $ 750.00 600.00 50,000.00 1J00.0Q $52,850.00 2.640.00 $55,490.00 13.870.00 $69,360.00 J APPENDIX A fCX)NTD1 DETAILED COST ESTIMATE TRUNK SEWER EXTENSIONS PART 1 . 2^10 14 10 2,00 1^ 1.20 440 26 10 2,400 a4 B937«pp 5 ,5 :>.• • ife'M STUBBS BAY NORTHWEST TRUNK CREDIT LF 8" PVC 0^’ deep @ $15.00/l.f. EA Manhole @ $l,200.00/ea. LF Jack casing for 8" PVC @ $ 150.00/l.f. LF Improved pipe fod. 6 ” Increments @ $2.00/l.f. CY Common excavation @ $5.00/cu.yd. TN Class 5 (100% crushed) @ $8.00/ton TN ^1 bituminous mixture @ $ 18.00/ton TN AC’l bit material fox mix @ $150.(X)/ton EA Tree Removal ^ $100.00/ea. SY Sod w/topsofl @ $3.00/s.y. Ac. Seed w/topsoil @ $3,000.00/ac. + 5% Contingencies Total Omstniction 25% Legal, Engineering & Admin. Total Estimated Cost • Part 1 A-17 $ 33,150.00 16,800.00 15,000.00 4.000. 00 6.000. 00 9.600.00 7.920.00 3.900.00 1,000.00 7.200.00 1.2QQ.W $105,770.00 gmOQ $111,060.00 27.760.00 $138,820.00 ? .i. . ...... . ^ '-7 V *•’»4’IK Atf ri I ■1; &?i;’ B?:,.*, •, » I fv;. r.v - I :>■ :J,rI C'-I m- W- >-r.. 1;»5; APPENDIX A rCONTD^ DETAn J D COST ESTIMAT ' TRUNK SEWER EXTENSIONS PARTH. 520 LF 8 40 100 2.400 700 1.100 460 25 2,100 13937^ LF EA LF LF LF CY TN TN TN SY BAY NORTHEAST TRUNK CRL PIT 8' PVC 12-14’ deep @ $23.00/l.f. 8* PVC 14-16’ deep @ $26.00/l.f. Manhole @ $l,200.00/ea. Manhole Overdepth @ $l,000.00/l.f. Jack casing for 8' PVC @ $150.()0/l.f. Improved pipe fod. 6" Increments @ $2.00/l.f. Common excavation @ $5.00/cu.yd. Class 5 (100% crushed) @ Sh 00/ton 2341 bituminous mixture (<l $ 18.00/ton AC-1 bit material fox mix @ $ 150.00/ton Sod w/topsofl @ $3.00/s.y. Subtotal 4- 5% Contingencies Total Omstruction 25% Legal. Engineering & Admin. Total Estimated Cost - Part II A-18 $11,960.00 7.280.00 9.600.00 4,000.00 15,000.00 4.800.00 3.500.00 8.800.00 8,280.00 3.750.00 6300.00 $83,270.00 JOhQDQ $87,430.00 2LS6QDQ $109,290.00 [t-’I{ ¥I I S'I I i I I I Iki' * '■; .-'^'•i:'-. ' ''I I il PfeS'v "•'■■ I ;'.-f c. . r.'.- I •>v xr ' 1.: I S;-!'','' S' I ;..r,I V. I i .■t,^ APPENDIX A rCONTD^ DETAn FD mST RSTIMATE TRUNK SEWER EXTENSIONS 1. V: ; >- PART m . BAYSIDE EAST TRUNK CREDIT IP V PVQ (r-8’ dp. @ $15.00/l.f. EA Manholes @ $l,200.00/ea. In^xoved pipe fod. 6" increment @ $2.00/l.f. Common excavation @ $5.00/c.y. Cau S (100% crushed) @ $8.00/ton 2341 bituminous mix @ $22.00/ton AC>1 bit material for mix @ $150.00/ton EA Tree removal @ $100.00/ea. SY Sod with topsoil @ $3.00/s.y. Subtotal <f S% Contingency Total Omstructiou 4* 23% Legal* Eng., A Adminis. Total Estimated Cost • Part III 2,100 90 no so 3 4S 1300 LF CY TN TN TN A-19 $21,000.00 4.800.00 4300.00 450.00 880.00 1.100.00 450.00 4.500.00 1.500.00 $42,780.00 2.140.00 $44,920.00 11^.00 $56,150.00 i ! t I r I •r-I E\I r'-I V '^y -I-I 0’~I II’r... I . r. . • ., j. f ■i'M' is- P? •' (l. !.•.»' if- k. I f'•^* 5;- /•tI ■?-i , L.‘I I I V. L.. F;I PARTvn CVG Cisf n II s 50 60 675 375 21 6 0l3 APPENDIX A rCONTDl DPTAII PD mST ESTIMATE TRUNK SEWER EXTENSIONS - PlJkCE TRUNK CREDIT r PVC, 8’-10’ deep @ $18w00/Lf. 8" PVC, lO’-ir deep @ $21.00/Ii. 8T PVC, ir-14’ deep @ $23.00/l.f. ar PVC, 14’-16’ deep @ $26.00/Lf. 8T PVC 16’-18’ deep @ $32.00/I.f. 8" PVC 18’-20* deep @ $34.00/I.f. 8" PVC 20’-22 ’ deep @ $36.00/J.f. 8T PVC 22 ’-24 ’ deep @ $38.00/I.f. tr PVC 24 ’-26’ deep @ $40.00/l.f. 8T PVC 26’-28’ deep @ $44.00/l.f. 8" PVC 28’-30’ deep @ $50.00/l.f. Manbote @ $l,200.00/each Manbote overdepth @ $100.00/I.f. 8T DIP, outside drop $100.00/l.f. Jack casing for 8” PVC @ $150.00/lin.ft C Common ocavation @ $5.00/cu.yd. TCM Class 5 (100% crushed) @ $8.0Q/ton TON 2341 Bituminous lU' v @ $18.00/ton TON AC-1 Bituminous matetrial for mix @ $150.00Aon EA Tree Removal @ $100.00/ea. SQYD Sod with topsoU @ $3.00/sq.yd. AC Seed with Tc^tsoil @ $3,000.00/Ac. Subtotal 5% Contingency Total Construction 4- 25% Legal, Eng. & Adminis. Total Est. cygnet Place Trunk Credit, Part VII LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF EA LF LF LF A-20 I III I i iii I iiii I mil $ 7,200.00 8.400.00 9.200.00 15.600.00 19.200.00 20.41 14.41 15,2 8,000.1 8,fi 10,000.00 22.800.00 9,000.00 500.00 9,000.00 3.375.00 8.160.00 6.750.00 3.150.00 € 2.71 •nil I $ 93,635.00 4.680.00 $ 96,315.1 24.575.1 $122,890.1 II t I I Ih k I f-.!I iP^.' 1^-I :•- ?-■ -I/• i. iv, 4^- m% ^ ■ I »^0 ,v*.' "fi i^'.\ ," I . ■ I ■v: ^.■ f V.* ■'.V i f"'- .;•; W <r Iir' _ ' ■■ V % .f. #21 jk.v T^:P^ ['I '•.. s|i|; :«3PT#: •i p-\ Im P: «,•: - .•• ■ :i. APPENDIX A (CONTD) DETAILED COST ESTIMATE TOTAL TRUNK SEWER COST EST1MA1 Lift Sutioo No. 1 - West Lake Street Lift Statioo Na 2 - East Lake Street Lift Statkn Na 3 • Bederwood Pirt I • Stubbs Bay Northwest Part n • Stubbs Bay Northeast Phit m • Bayside East Part Vn - cygnet Place Ibtal Trmak Sewer Cost Estimate 13937app $149,83a00 183»750.00 69.360.00 138.820.00 109.290.00 56.150.00 122.890.00 $83t,OM.OO A>21 as* i.f-'b ■■ 1 1 t 1 ^ • y / tin • V l-^«- iWvIlDIEr V» . I ► • •• Mr«\2 1,5, ■ './,i. m: «?■ t< {, I lUyfc^CllLTfk"!r^ :Wm t / » ^ w II UM r'Jf,■^f!0i *: “ ■STUBBSi .« /. M I - ^ . .1 ..<0 I .•.«! \ • r^-Av V /-/r^ 1*-^> \ ••. ■ i ..-.IfT-r. ‘i*. l^'S-i pvs' . ■*;' ■ I V- *'»«•! I I SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS i ORONO, MINNESOTA I , I //. iimu FIGURE 1 :Se;xsii^. -CAsri ^ .' ll ’ •.* V ■• - »i • -. ' n • • • *z I STUBBS BAY 1 -_____tJ. i -f Ik -»-*t ., 5'- V •» ■ ■ OmONO. mnnisota Fiouwe 2 ^m^so¥tmm% 1/1§fumu0f mwt» A % Of/30/ll M CM MftCOM CMP • NAME 4773tlM5 lUTLER. MARY C 4ltllt02« CALLAHAN. CDWARO J 1I334477 OOETTEN. J.OXANN 473M4272 JAItOUR. QAtRICL 4IM0513S PETERSON. BARtARA A CURRENT OPT •GROSS n It. ••241 47 11 2175 03 241 47 11 21Y5.03 241 47 11 2175.03 241 47 11 2700.00 300.00 1.244.44 • ■ • ffi' ; \‘ - 09/15/91 PR CB PRREGOR 106 r i:"v t'-'' EMP • NAME 470204824 471611060 474563339 471940671 475443162 472503991 469526026 476643367 475966721 466621016 472529007 466701666 507565424 469666562 466420632 469017664 474667612 475360151 477500666 475444249 477463677 471569693 473141624 477647279 475604753 470116449 504260307 472500574 121262417 475344512 476016674 477700023 334506261 477026779 473101421 461909535 476763251 470700901 469646107 475362963 473746173 473609629 469629194 475569177 101266716 267460042 472563051 ABRAHAMSON. FREDERIC ANDERSON BRUCE L BOeZIEN SUE A BOSMA. JAMIE L BRXNKHAUS. JOHN F CHESWICK. GARY B CORNICK. JAMES L DELANEY. JANE E OEMBOUSKI. JAY C ENGLISH III. IRVING ERICKSON. KURT R FISCHENICH DAN T FRITZUER, JOHN M QAFFRON. MICHAEL P QERHARDSON. JOHN R GOMAN. DAVID J GREGORY. JAMES 0 HALLIN, DOROTHY M STEVEN C CAROL J CAROLE BRADLEY P FOREST J RICKY 0 JANICE M JR. PAUL J . _ _ CHARLOTTE AKUEHN. THOMAS M MABUStH. JEANNE A MCINTYRE. WILLIAM E MILLS JR. WALTER H MOORSE. RONALD J MOROWCZYNSKl. JAMES NELSON. DAVID D OAS. DANIEL 0 OBERAIQNEft. SCOTT G OBRIEN. RANDY L OMAN. LYLE E PALMER. GREGORY A OUAST. WAYNE A RATHBUN. BARRY J ROSS. JOHN A SKREEN. DALE S STEFFENHAGEN. RONALD STEVENS. BETTY G SUUIVAN. STEPHEN X THOMTON. MARK R HANSEN. HANSING HASEMAN JOHNSON JOSTROM KARNITZ KENNEN. KLEVANN KNUTSON DPT YTO CURRENT GROSS GROSS 93 935 00 97 503131990 19 ISOO 443118274 44 951 721211016 27 681 514226899 63 1522 883131288 00 1648 003132032 43 1479 9793770 00 215 003111786 58 1229 103131328 63 1590 543127403 08 1517 863129458 53 1658 283130162 01 1599 043326420 49 1392 244236526 68 2005 0235920 19 108 724225310 65 1611 761222758 73 1199 284221082 67 1400 793110486 81 582 6912407 48 407 483129662 83 1467 87931717.50 142 50317652 20 752 1431851 46 218 85612955 00 320 001518193 53 958 711538607 20 2048 073333758 70 1743 5293475 00 67 50932142 03 136 50121219 20 1219.20 35 93 42 92 33 42 92 LAWRENCE 500*03192 WALTERs!*^LINDA G 477181539 WECKMAN. STEPHEN J 34.->4 1F34 16292 21555 2f.654 8: 11577 04 26016 52 21 28 25 91 60 69 97 50 1499 199 71 87 0 08 1407 47 1352 02 i S81 24 29 44 92 21674 96 IC:* 6293511 89 eO 364221* 04 35 •234 859322730 45 1200 96932225.00 201 00313769.:?1664 563127198 14 1586 96 31 30149 45 1604 793127361 90 1496 053322250 12 1199 291216052 82 895 24152C703 97 1111 913317277 08 945 12 55.860 09 r: I' u 09/01/91 PR CB PRIIEGCM 107 ^/#c€ Rui — CNP ■ MAKE 471MB0B0 46«$2e02647Sttt721 46ll2101t472S2B007 46t701tei 471SltlB3 33450B2ai 472SB30S1 474M32M 470704904 ANOCtSON. BRUCE L COBNICK. JAMES L OCMBOUSKI. JAY C CNOLISH III, IRVING EBICKSON, KURT R PISCHENidH. DAN T JOHNSON. BRADLEY P MONOWCZYNSKl. JAMES TNOMTON. MARK R TOMCNCCK. LAWRENCE f TOMCZYK. MARK W DPT YTD CURRENT GROSS GROSS 31 32955 99 965.803132992 83 960 403112144 60 358 023132259 61 931.053128263 22 860 1431302/4 37 815 843130’62 47 899 643131499 62 917 41 31 28001 68 803 543131045.31 895 863128174 79 812 89 9.220 59 8 S S S i b M'k, **'■ r k>- r a iA t> I Ifti CITY OF QROMO CNfCK NO. DATE 20M02 mtfmmm 2M010 w ••*••• ^ 2i«OI4 irfev: '«•••■« WJi m"UMvm. . . ^2M0t4 Iv. - M4Mt itttota _vif : 214015 0, 244045 l^ V ■ ft. *••••• c'=’> ■ ^/J44100 Of/17/tl 04/17/fl 04/17/41 04/17/41 04/17/41 04/17/41 04/17/41 04/17/41 04/17/41 04/17/41 04/17/41 04/17/41 04/17/41 04/17/41 04/17/41 AMOUNT 44.44 44.lt • 11.14 11.14 • 35.00 35.00 • 7.40 7.40 • 32.51 32.51 • 3.50 3.50 • 144.47 53.25 175.73 53.25 424.20 • 14.51 11.51 • 50.46 74.00 124.44 * 1.445.22 1.445.22 • 15.44 15.46 ‘ CHECK REGISTER VENDOR A-1 MINNETONKA RENT AT4T INfO SYSTEM ALL STAR ELECTRIC AT A T com AUQIES MOBILE CHEF BLITZ ONE HR FOTO BLACKOWIAK A SONS BLACKOWIAK A SONS BLACKOWIAK A SONS BLACKOWIAK A SONS BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS BUDGET PRINTING BUDGET PRINTING CASE POWER A EQUIP CHESWICK/GARY ITEM DESCRIPTION RENTAL COMPRESSOR TELEPHONE LGT REPAIR TELEPHONE SANDWICHS PHOTOS TRASH HAUL TRASH HAUL TRASH HAUL TRASH HAUL PRICE CORRECTION RATE LETTER RATE LETTER REPAIR LOADER MILEAGE 09-23-41 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. 4 MESSAGE 01-4331-249-42 72-4320-549-91 01-4343-099-17 01-4320-175-34 74-4102-591-94 01-4210-129-31 01-4343-099-17 01-4343-129-31 01-4343-240-41 74-4343-590-43 01-4233-249-42 72- 4322-549-91 73- 4322-569-92 01-4342-249-42 01-4341-129-31 -CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS -CKS -CKS -CKS -CKS -CKS -CKS -CKS I I n fe-i'; >-f' ’ '' Ittl cm OF OtOMO CHCCK NO 2M130 SfCDOSMUO mi«2 2M147 2ftl47 2441I7 MkMtk* y ^ 2fflM2Mltt , 2442ft Srrfi': ’l8s: l5‘vM«2»e 244272 r 244272 iite:. ■■■ iixS • i' :v - f "■.-'!} CHECK REGISTER 04-23-I1 FAQE DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV.9 P 0. 9 MESSAGE 04/17/91 04/17/91 09/17/91 41.16 .01 147.41 214.21 m COLONIAL Lire INS CO COLONIAL Lire INS CO COLONIAL LIFE INS CO SEPT INS SEPT INS SEPT INS 01-41S2-121-31 01-4152-129-31 01-4152-129-31 •••-CKS 04/17/91 20$.00 20$.00 • COPY DUP PR INC RENTAL 01-4210-129-31 •••-CHS 04/17/91 04/17/91 39.99 9 97 49.$$m CROWN MARKING INC CROWN MARKING INC NAPilE PLATE NAME PLATE 01-4210-039-12 01-4210-129-31 ••*-CKS 04/17/91 34. SO 34. $0 • EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER 74-4915-591-94 •••-CKS 09/17/91 04/17/91 234.00 $.6$0.00 $.994.00 ft ROLF E ERICKSON ROLF E ERICKSON SUPPLIES OCT FEE 01-4210-059-14 01-4307-059-14 •••-CKS 04/17/91 11.2$ 11.2$ft EXPRESS MESSENGER POSTAGE 01-4321-039-12 •••-CKS 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 303.49 7.$2 34.7$ 347.79 ft GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO PARTS PARTS PARTS 01-4232-249-42 01-4232-290-91 72-4232-549-91 •••-CKS 09/17/91 09/17/91 132.2$ 141.79274.04 ft OLENWOOD INGLEWOOD GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD WATER CUPS 01-4231-099-17 74-4231-590-93 •••-CKS 04/17/91 3$.9$ 3$.9$ft GRAINGER>W W PARTS 01-4232-249-42 •••-CKS 04/17/41 04/17/91 94.$4 94.$9 m OAK SERVICES G A K SERVICES MATS HATS 01-4231-039-12 01-4231-039-12 'V.- ■{ jl '0 : 4 'it *_i -id ..'i -?S IMi CITY CHECK NO 266272 266272 ■266272 t'296272 2M27t 26t27l 2lt2tl 2M3S3 2«C393mi 2N353 2tt3SS 2M401 r; h- p',rM:, ■ 2M439 2M439 2M43S 2M43S 2M43S 2M439 2|C439 2M439 24443SI8i» 2|t43S 3M43Smt ';'e- -t‘*Yi : 0:p:-'s ■ ■- „ iajfeis* OF OtONO DATE 04/17/91 09/17/41 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/01 .... AMOUNT ■ 4.$9 13 74 41.29 9.36 141.96 * 36.00 54.00 00 00 • 5 30 5.30 • 29 29 29 29 29146 70 70 70 70 70 50 47.95 47.95 • CHECK REQISTEt VEN009 ITEM DESCRIPTION G 4 K SERVICES G 4 K SERVICES Q 4 K SERVICES G 4 K SERVICES MATS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS GOPHER STATE ONECAU GOPHER STATE ONECALL AUG FEE AUG FEE HAUIN/OOROTHY MILEAGE INTL INTL INTL INTL INTL MAILING MAILING MAILING MAILING MAILING SYSTEMS SYSTEMS SYSTEMS SYSTEMS SYSTEMS PO MTR 10/1-12/31 PO MTR 10/1-12/31 PO MTR 10/1-12/31 10/1-12/31 10/1-12/31 PO MTR PO MTR INTERSTATE BATTERIES BATTERY ACCOUNT NO INV 01-4231-129-31 72- 4221-549-91 73- 4221-569-92 74- 4221-590-93 72- 4306-549-91 73- 4306-569-92 01-4361-039-12 01-4321-039-12 01-4321-069-15 01-4321-174-3301-4321-249-42 73-4321-569-92 74-4341-590-93 601.25 601.25 • LABOR RELATNS ASSOC B/13 GRIEVANCE 01-4306-129-31 69.00 LOOIS SUITE 300 BZ TERMINAL HNT 01-4340-174-33791.11 LOQIS -SUITE •00 LOGIS APPL SUPP AUG 01-4352-069-15456.60 LOOIS •SUITE 300 LOGIS APPL SUPP AUG 01-4352-129-31240.77 LOQIS -SUITE 300 LOGIS APPL SUPP AUG 01-4352-174-3350.22 LOQIS -SUITE 300 DATA PROC AUG 01-4355-039-12577.41 LOQIS •SUITE 300 DATA PROC AUG 01-4355-069-15766.91 LOQIS -SUITE 300 DATA PROC AUG 01-4355-129-31336.75 LOQIS •SUITE 300 DATA PROC AUG 01-4355-174-3323.60 LOQIS •SUITE 300 LABELS BROCHURE 15-4210-651-007.09 LOOIS SUITE 300 LABELS RATE LTR 72-4210-549-91144.46 LOQIS -SUITE 300 LOGIS APPL SUPP AUG 72-4352-549-9137.66 LOOIS m SUITE 300 DATA PROC AUG 72-4355-549-9116.50 LOQIS -SUITE 300 LABELS RATE LTR 73-4210-569-92337.07 LOQIS -SUITE 300 LOGIS APPL SUPP AUG 73-4352-569-9269.01 968.36 •LOGIS ••SUITE 300 DATA PROC AUG 73-4355-569-92 09-23-91 PAGE 6 PC 9 MESSAGE •••-CKS -CKS -CKS -CKS •CKS -CKS •••-CKS ' l-‘ ' 'h IMl CITY OF MONO CHECK NO. DATE 2Ct43r 2U439 f. •••••• !■ i 2t949t IStiti ••••AH 2C949I AAAAAH ^-tM4T4 AAAAAA < D8!! ^v. i 1^0477 *>■%••••• F I8S» m.iiAAAt il8«8 A***** Ot/17/9i Ot/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 •- 1 AMOUMT 2.S34 40 2.534.40 • 1.70 1.70 * 20.59 20.59 • 749.99 12.00 791.99 • 120 120 492 351 1.053 00 00 00 00 00 10.957.00 10.957.00 • 57 17 17 17 17 17 149 99 99 99 99 99 99 41 • 1.131.29 421.04 1.552.30 • 99,599.55 929.25 70.495.90 • CHECK AEGISTE9 VEH009 ITEM 0ESC9IFT1ON CITY Of LONG LAKE LONG LK FORD TRACTOR MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT MARTINS NAVARRE 86 MARTINS NAVARRE 66 MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE METRO WASTE MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWESTMIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST RSNS BSNS 9SNS BSNSBSNS BSNS PROD PROD PROD PRODPROD PROD MIDWEST ASPHALT MIDWEST ASPHALT WM MUELLER A SONS WM MUELLER A SONS 3RD QTR PART PART AUTO REPAIR TIRE REPAIR OCT INS OCT INS OCT INS OCT INS OCT FEE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES HOTMIX HOTMIX MIX TACK 09-23-91 PAGE 4 ACCOUNT NO INV. • P.O. 9 MESSAGE 01-4332-129-31 01-4232-249-42 01-4232-249-42 01-4341-129-31 74-4342-590-93 01-4131-099-15 01-4151-129-31 01-4151-174-33 01-4151-249-42 73-1212-000-00 01-4210 01-4210 01-4210 01-4210 01-4210 01-4210 039-12059-14 069-15 129-31174-33 249-42 01-4233-249-42 01-4233-249-42 01-4233-249-42 01-4233-249-42 -CRS -CKS -CKS •••-CKS NAN -CKS -CKS -CKS -CKS -CKS 1 4 .■1' .1 .1- w. t. in'u IMl CITY OF OKONO CMCK m. DATE " If' I 2MS4C •t$4t •tS4t MS40 P 2MS4I 2ftS4t 2Mf4t IMMImm2ff«4t!il2MS4I 2ttS4t ¥i i::u! V-. g 2MSS2 S' 'r • V !■ t99»97 kv 1 296S99 1.296913 p:-299615 2Mt31 09/17/91 Ot/17/fl Ot/17/tl Of/17/ll 0t/17/»l 04/17/fl Ot/17/4i Ot/17/tl Ot/17/ll Of/17/tl Of/17/fl Ot/17/tl Ot/17/fl 02/17/91 Ot/17/9i 09/17/41 Ot/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 p- pi- . .V.. . i ‘t ^ j-i.jp- AMOUNT 200.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 500.00 3 22 41 49 37 3 9 119 93 297 24 IS 94 94 19 05 0977 90 30 11 96 SO 175.22 271.72 • 39.22 39.22 • 4.123.51 4.123.51 • 12.00 12.00 • 2.193 40 2,193.40 ■ 23.00 23.00 • 3.390.00 3.390.00 • CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION NAAO TERRI NAAS TERRI NAAO TERRI NAAS TERRI 1-26 A 9-9 CC HTQ 9-16 PLAN MTG 9-4 PARK MTG FAC PUBLIC MTG NSP NSP UTILITIESUTILITIES OMAN/LYLE MILEAGE PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 9/2-15 PERA INS OCT INS PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR REPAIR PERRYS VENTURES INC CAR WASH POLKA DOT RECYCLING AUG RECYLING ACCOUNT NO. INV 01-4306-020-11 01-4309-174-33 01-4306-290-61 15-4306-651-00 NAVARRE HARDWARE SUPPLIES 01-4210-174-33NAVARREHARDWARESUPPLIES01-4232-099-17NAVARREHARDWARESUPPLIES01-4232-129-31NAVARREHARDWARESUPPLIES01-4232-249-42NAVARREHARDWARESUPPLIES01-4232-290-61NAVARREHARDWARESUPPLIES01-4233-249-42NAVARREHARDWARESUPPLIES72-4231-549-91NAVARREHARDWARESUPPLIES72-4232-549-91NAVARREHARDWARESUPPLIES73-4234-599-92NAVARREHARDWARESUPPLIES74-4232-590-93 01-4324-249-42 73-4324-569-92 01-4391-174-33 01-2031-000-00 01-4152-129-31 01-4341-249-42 01-4342-290-61 01-4392-295-65 09-23-91 PAGE 6 P 0 9 MESSAGE • MM -CKS -CKS -CKS ^••-CKS -CKS -CKS M M M •CKS -CKS .(I 1 Ittl CITY OF MONO CMCCK NO. DATE 21MS7 Ot/17/91 2Mtll 2tltt2 2M9tS 2fM7S mtD2 m?it w<. i^lifTAO - tM742 S1«}» #•*••** ■ r I'H. 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 P|MT79 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 AMOUNT SS.76 SS.79 • 43.51 43.51 • 92.70 92.;o • 33.01 33.01 * 325.72 325.72 • 5.103.59 5.103.59 • 30.00 30.00 • 19.95 19.95 • 1,071.70 1,071.70 • 505.00 200.00 705.00 • 57.50 57.50 • 45.94 29.92 CHECK REOISTEK VEND09 ITEM DESCRIPTION R7Q PET A SUPPLY CO SCHARBER A SONS INC REED VENDING RICKS SUPERVALU ROLLINS OIL CO SATHE A ASSOC INC DIXIE PETRO-CHEM STRETCHERS STRQAR ROSCOE FAUSCH TOWN A COUNTRY TOWN A COUNTRY THORPE DIST CO US WEST COP94UN US WEST C0M4UN -- - - - - - -- ..a.-..,. DOG FOOD REPAIR CANDY A CIGS SUPPLIES GASOLINE CITY ADHIN SEARCH §3 DEMURRAGE BELT HWY 12 STUDY SEPT CLEANING SEPT CLEANING BEER TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 09-23-91 PAGE 9 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 9 P 0. 9 fCSSAQE 01-4244-129-31 74-4342-590-93 74-4902-591-94 74-4232-590-93 74-4220-590-93 01-4304-299-72 72-4234-549-91 01-4221-129-31 01-4306-299-72 01-4343-099-17 Cl-4343-129-31 74-411 -591-94 01-4320-129-31 01-4320-249-42 -CXS •CKt •••-CK5 •••-CNt -CKS •••-CNS -CKS -CKS •••-CKS ■'I ■ :n ■.5S Iftl CITY OF OtONO P\'W'm fe: '-V \ .” ■r-iV .■■'. iv*-' >■'mm^yi rifi:. ■■'^: CHECK ffEGISTER CHECK NO.DATE AMMMT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ill09/17/9109/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 27.41 S3.64 22.42 33.22 212.2S • US WEST C07WUN US WEST C0I94UN US WEST COMHUN US WEST C0M4UN DATA PROC TELEPHONE DATA PROC DATA PROC 2MtSS 09/17/91 S00.63 S00.63 • WARNING LITES Of MN FLASHERS 2ttl42 09/17/91 1.622.75 1.622.75 • WAY2ATA-CITY OF 4TH OTR FIRE 2tSt44 09/17/91 65$.00 6SS.00 • WAYZATA BAY CAR WASH CAR WASH TICKETS 2ttS4S 09/17/91 20.29 20.21 • WCCKMAN STEPHEN MILEAGE 2M901 09/17/91 13.55 13.55 •GABRIEL JABBOUR MTG m 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 4.00 14.00 1.765.00 1,763 00 • NN DEPT OF REVENUE MN DEPT OF REVENUE MN DEPT OF REVENUE AUG SALES TAX AUG SALES TAX AUG SALES TAX 2MM)09/17/91 1.930.50 1.930.50 • METRO WASTE SAC CHRG 2tif04 09/17/91 17.94 17.94 • COMMERCIAL EMBLEM NAME BADGE 2M90S 09/17/91 109.45 106.45 • AMER SECURITY ED HANDBOOKS 09/17/91 09/17/91 09/17/91 11.so il.50 11.50 11.50 • TRI K SPORTS TRI K SPORTS TRI K SPORTS SWITCH SWITCH SWITCH 2U907 09/17/91 210.00 210.00 • INTOXIMETERS INC REPAIR 2M90I 09/17/91 125.00 125.00 • KONARD MARINE REFD APPL FEE ACCOUNT NO. INV 01-43S$-0e**19 72-4320-S4f-ttl 72- 43SS-54f-91 73- 43S5-SB9-92 01-4331-249>42 01<431l-133-32 01-4341-129-31 01-4391-174-33 01-4312-020-11 01-3SOO-000-00 72-2222-000-00 74-2222-000-00 01-2226-000-00 01-4221-129-31 01-4240-129-31 01-4232-290-61 01-4232-290-61 01-4232-290-61 01-4342-129-31 01-3502-000-00 • A■i i 09-23-91 FAQE 9 9.0. 9 MESSAOC •••-CKS •••-CK9 -CKS •••-CKS -CKS 41 1 A ■ J •*r ?T i {it--;'¥' Ittl CITY OF 0*0110¥b CNICN HO DATE AMOUNT CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIFTION OR-29>tl FAQE ACCOUNT NO. INV. • F.O. • MESSAGE 112.S24.7S FUND 01 TOTAL123. SO FUND IS TOTAL •'■ »47S.SS FUND 72 TOTAL ■/r.' ,11.SIS.SO FUND 73 TOTAL2.732.17 FUND 74 TOTAL p 127.S75.OI TOTAL |l'^ l-k |£'7- tj- ^ f ;- js’j’ a * <| i 'i-# I®, ’■:; iir^ 'b- y- V"mMh 'Vr- '^wm GENERAL FUND BUILONO CARITAL OUTLAY f WATER OFCRATINQ FUND SEWER OFERATING FUND GOLF COURSE OFERATING FD V ma ,y 'i •1 . m SjJ 3 •I' v|I x:: >.T.i Tl I liNilN^lBfli ?lsi t 75 Vf«iS hu,t\ Cl I ■‘l, j*:| L COUNCIL IKE uTWg SEP 2 3 199] ^^OFOKONO i'Vr U'-‘ W -jiit S', I ;•* r'^ .'1 fi.'k. tf'- ? • >.• rr •.’r ^ % \‘- i,'ft. P'k- w >«i» — • .H 12 CORRIDOR STLDY SEP TH 101 - TH 25 1 6 ISSl POLICY COMNUTTEE MEETING NOTICE Wednesday, September 18, 1991 Maple Plain City Hall 5:30 p.m. AGENDA I,Call to Order II.Status of Alternative Layouts UI.Discussion of Impact Evaluation Criteria and Results IV.Other business (August 21, 1991 Minutes) V.Comments from the Audience VI.Next Meeting VII.Adjournment l4l1MpA#i^.fal IHIMTB ■ V.' '< ^*.V. ■ * • ^, m1I h •IMPACT OF ALTERNATIVE IN WAVZATA cRireiuoN 1 2 2A 2B 2C 2D 2E 2F 2C 3 3A 3B 3C 4 4A 4B 1. llMlwr«f Imhw RMMiicca wilhi« rtw MffUw.* 0 0 0 0 0 0 IM IM IM IM IM IM IM IS IS IS j 2. No. of wtftolioo moofcei in eorridor. (P * fMa, L • Lafcn, 0 » Oolf Covnct) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (10)(10) (10) 1. No. of mUMM MriN/prnpHtko in ccnidor.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N o T A P P L 1 C A B L E #. AetmMKtf ftoovd time) to Metro Aroe. (VO ■ Voiy Good) VC VC VO VO VG VG VG VG VG VG VO VO VC VO VG VO 7. AffiopriMe lii(b«my ecccM Ibr locel 4mlofoieHl7 (Y ■ Yea) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y i No. of fwMwicei widdn 400 fr* ***'’vay. IHV vOWIVOb# 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 7 f. No. of wodMd ood floodphio t uKridor.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f#. No. of woodhod oerct in oonidor.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ••• It. No. of acno of otrieoloral hud in eorridor.0 0 0 ; 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 It. No^ of oem of Af. Ptcecrw fcnohnd in ^VSol^Vo* 0 0 e 0 0 0 a 0 ] 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 lofdjp ood oflehoejt of tnflie on exial. TH 12. (0 • Good* VO “ Very Good) VO VG VO VO VC VG VG VG G G j G 0 0 VO VO VO t 14. to ml Imflb mooomcal ncrom/odjo. to exining YH 12. fO - Good) 0 G G •G G G G G o ^ G G G 0 0 0 IS. LowlofiondMOocxM. TH 12 in peoli how.**B B B 1 B B B B c c C c C B B B li. Lowlof mrvkooo TH 12 oKcnwIive in peak hoof.** B B B B B B B B c c c c B B 1 1 B I7e Itee nf CMHlii/lMil fpnda Bknly lo ncnl cnoaciiv • 1 I 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ^ Wont LOS in nny loestion ibr i given Akemative.^ Schools, DC ^ ‘ V Care Centers, M » Municipal, C > Churehca, H " HiHQfk SUUdUftt Pfc^-' fe -1-jjj.'. ¥t • i- IMPACT OF ALTERNATIVE IN ORONO CMfTElUON -------1 1 2 2A 2B 2C 2D 2C 2F 20 3 3A 3B 3C 4 4A 4B to Wnwfccrof Iw— ifoiMcw wMiiii the eorrklof.^0 0 IDC IDC IDC IDC 0 0 0 IH IH 0 0 N:0 NHI N4 S:1S S:1S S:tS 3. Nn. «f NMnlin hmiotm in cocndor.0 IP IP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N;2P N;2P N:2P • iMki, L • Ldm. O • Ooir CowMo)StlP.l SrlP.lG S:1P.1 G G 9o Hm. #f liiidHlkl wJli^ptopcifkt in corridor.0 17 17 2 30 30 17 30 30 43 43 4t 4t N;9I N:S3 N:St S:S0 S:49 S:90 4. Nn. nf hMinHHi in coctidor.0 4 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N:l N:0 N V 1 S:l S;0 S:1 N 0 T A p P L 1 C J A B L B C. hmmMKkf Rmvoi iIhm) in Mouo Am.F VO G G VG VG VO VG VO VG VC va VG VG VG VG (P • fWr. 0 - Onnd. VO - Vcyy Good) 7. RffinpfiMnll^MMjrnoeeM fir local Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y NtYco N:Yta N:Yca I1iS:Yco S:Yao S:Yaa t. Hn. nf mHniii wltlii 40Rfcai ef highway.13 13 13 60 12 12 17 2t 2t SO SO 46 46 N;4S N;34 N:49 tiks •S:«l fl:S4 S«1 fo Ns. of Mini tad floodplm ncfcs in corridor.0 It It It 25 25 22 30 30 9 9 24 24 N:37 N:31 N:97 S:34 S:2t t:34 1 M. No. of nmdknd aem la corridor.0 1 1 7 16 16 24 24 24 49 49 50 90 N:96 N;9«N:9C S:92 t:92 S:S2 II. No. of ami of ofrieofennl land in corridor.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 13. No. of acm of Ar. bnoknd in 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 oanidar. IS. SaAlf and allalMMf of tnlBo on caioi. TH 12.F G p F F F VG VG VG 0 G G o p VO G IP ■ IWr. a • Good. VO - Voty Good)1 14. Loorf ImHo nMOOHMl aeion/a^i. to cuMini P p p F F F G G 0 G G G G G G G TN13. (P ■ lyr, 0 - Good. P - Ptoor) IS. UnNofaMvioooaaiiri.THlSinpMkbottr.**B c D c D D B B D c C C C D B C M. LmrfofamiaoooTH 12 afecnaitvo in peak E C D C(TH12) D c B C c B E C c D D D Raw.**B(CR6) IT. No.afaa«iF/lMalfoodili(ci]rleneedcapacily 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 2 2 4 S 4 4 4 5 4 1 ** Woial IjOS in mf bc«inn fat • ghrcn Ahcmalive.* 5 « School*. DC « Dajr C*re Ceiilerf. H ■ Munieipol, C • Chnidin, H ■■ Hiilorie StnelMHi CRIfBUON IMPACT OF ALTERNATIVE IN LONG LAKK I. Ni Mfii «r.* 2H IM 2H IM 2H IM 2H IM 214 IM 0 a. N*. •#«MMr in conMor. IT - PlMkn. L • UkM. O • Ootf Courwt) ;;:l 9. N». W ikiljprnpHtiM in cortidof .10 4. Ito.«r 0 9. ■«.•r 1*90 S).B • Mr, P a Nnr, VO ■ Very Good) 7. Afpaprfaln kiifMMy neecn far locnl jPNiifiMy (T • Yen) B. N».«r 400 Ibtl of U^iwny, f. Nn.«r mi Ibnd^liin acm in corridor. M. No. of II. N*. of 12. N4. «f MNi of Af. Mnww itraikad in 0 0 19. 12. (P • Mr. P - ^Mr onaklincTH . VP - Very Poor) 14. LMillnlBi awMaMMl >ci oM/n^. lo exHt. TH 12. > Mr, P ■ P»or, VP - Very Mw) 19. LdViltiMrviMMOKial. TH 13 in peak hoar.** VP P E B D CTO 12) B N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A >' IT. St;N>da. j;.. I'MM' . ill'B-^r h’X'- ** Wont LOS in any location ibr a given Akcrmiive.* S B School!. DC B Day Cate Center!, M * MunicipaL C * ClmidMO, H * HiNofia SHocI moa ----------j CWTERION I. N of iMMMa retouicct widiin the 2. No. of toer wrimi moofcei in corridor. (P ■■ Nikf, L • Likci, G - Golf Courtet) 4. No.orboNi in corridor. S. IM. cooMfOcUoncoM CmiUiom of 1990 S). 4. AoooiiMtty flinvd lime) to Metro Area. fO •> Good. VO - Very Good) t (Y - Yea) I. No. of neideneoa wiilMn 400 feel of hithway, f. No. of and lloodplain aciea in corridor. Ml No. of in corridor. II. No. of MMOof nirbokoial fend in corridor. 12. No. of of ' Pwa e irna femrlMid in »y of traffic on eaktint TH 12. (P • Poor) acr oa a/a d)acerO lo 12. (P • iNrar) IMPACT OF ALTERNATIVE IN MEDINA202F O T B B IS. Loca l of aaroiao on a a ia linfi TH 12 in peak Imur. Ifi. Lwral of aa rciaa on TH 12 aBama lfei in peak IT. tapoooanMnk !• I.fe • S « School!, DC •> Day Care Ccnicn, M - Municiynl, C - Ckncdica. H • Hktoffe Sttiwdcwa IMPACT OF ALTERNATIVE IN MAPLE PLAIN CRrrEMON I.willlifi the t. N*. «f fHMMM fHoiUcc* ia corridor. I 0 (P * IMu, L " La Iuh , O * Oolf Coonct) r Ho. or Miliwilll Mlllf»wpimii b corridor. 4. Ho. or h corridor. t ’ f. ■«.(oiiKoM of 1990 %). <P - O - Ocod, VO • Very Good) 7. AppoopriHoMgbwoyoeccMfBr Idcc I (Y - Yee) t. No.of fed of hifhway, f. Ho. of in corridor. 13. No. of OMOC of A%. Hocfi'ri Hrmluid in (P • Mr. O • Good. P - Pmt Mid TH 12. . VO - Very Ml LmNImAc omohoch I crioccfi^. to cutting IN 11. fP • Mr. 0 - Good. P - Hwr) •• E E 17. No. ofooaHfAMnl node Ml|r to nend cnpccily C(THI2)N/A G N/A B B B N/A B N/A 0 VO • VO B N/A N/A N/A O N/A e N/A N/A 4 ** Word L04 in My ioedion for ■ given AJiemalive • S » Schoolt. DC • Day Care Cenlcn, M - MuMcifioI. C * Chwetea. H - Hid«io BUnctoicc . •CMTEMON IMPACT OF ALTERNATIVE IN INDKrENDRNCK2R I. Nimber of humio mourcct within llie 2. No. of focfOilioiiiOMMirocifai corhclor. (P • Hfkt» L » Lakes, 0 ■> Oolf Courses) 2. No. of PBsliMllal iHiki/pn>|«flks in corridor 4. No. of bosii in corridor. S. Bsl.lOcIhNi cost (inillkNis of I B §. AtcoasMIiljr (Move! time) lo Metro Ares. fO » Good, f » Poor, VO ■ Very Good) G G VG VG 7. Afpsof^fiBie highway access for local dioehpnifOlT (Y * Yes) y Y Y B. No. of fssiiwirrs within 400 fed of highway,22 f. No. of and floodplain acres in ctMridor.27 36 M. No . of acfss m corridor. II. No. of aesoa of afrsrsh * * sd in corridor.92 It. No. of oeios of Ag. IVr*lanfiland in 2« II. MNy and oflicitney of Itaffe on eaisiinf TH 12. |0 - Good, F • Poor, VG « Very Good) VG 14. LoaN Iraflla movement acrosa/acha. to eiiisting TN 12. (P • Phk. O - Good. P » Nmr) G tS. Losol of aanriaa on eaisl. TH 12 in peak bour.^^B B B B B B B B Bail 1 2)C c 9a Worst LOS in any location for • given AHcmaiivc • S ^ SilMMili. DC ^ Day Care Centers. M « Municipal, C » Cburdiea, H * HisWric Stnactonea r.7 CRITERION I. Nwrim 0f tMiniM mowca wWiin (he 2. N». «f netwliM fnourcct in corridor. (R • Nika, L " LnkM, O Golf Couraet) 2. N*. «f icaymkl wiilt/pfopertiet in comdor. 4. N*. *f bmiacnca in corridor. S. Bn. conNiwcfion coal (millioM of 1990 $). B. AMMMHly (bnvd lime) to Mclro Arm. (O - Ono4) T. Aprroffkm hi^h.«ny acccn lor local NmfcfnmtT fV • Yet) t. Nn. nf iwMcmm wMiin 400 feel of highway, IMPACT OP ALTh^NATIVP. IN li.YMOimt f. Nn. nf iwIIm4 and floodphiin acrca in corridor It. Nn.nf ncret in corridor. II. Nn. nf annt nf ngticniliiral hind in corridor. 12. Nn. nf name nf Ag. INeaervea Carmiand in 12. In.%qr nnd nffieiency of IrafTw on enitliog TH 12. ovnmenl acroea/ndiaccni m TM 12. IS. LtMl nf torvicn nn raitUng TH 12 In fimk hour. on TH 12 themnlivr in penh Ihtai fondi Nwljr lo need capacity I 1C 2C 2F • S ^ S< h<H»|R. !>(' Dny Cmrr f>nicf«. M ■’ Muiiici|iftl, C • Clliifclwa, N « H • ^ t r CMTEKION 1. H». m (T - Pfeifca. L - corridor. Lakes, a Ool( Courses) 3. He. ef iwUndiil enks/profeitks in corridor. ^ I 4. No. erbwk in corridor. S. Bm. cwtwrtieii cod (millions of 1990 S). k I C. AocecsMily (Irevd iknc) lo Mdio Arcs. ^ ■ CO - Qeed. Va - Vety Good. VP - Very 7. AfpnptiM M^nsejr access for local or - Yes) •.Nn.nl sridiin 400 ChI of highway. 0. Nn. nl ssollMi and floodplain acres in corridor. M. Nn.nl actea in corridor. II. Nn. nf acres el agricnknral land in corridor. IMPACT OF ALTERNATIVE IN DELANO NOT 0 13. Nn.nl It. imflf and aflWancjr of iralfie on caisting TH 13. (P - Mr. P - Psor. VO - Vary Gmd) HI 13. (P - Pak. P - Pnor) mnM. TN 13 ki peak hour.•• 17. Nn. N NO SO N.IP SIP NS S 8 N 20 S 13 G N 61 S 57 N 21 S 21 NO SO N.<1 S <1 N 0 SO B NO SO NIP S IP N 8 S 8 N:20 S 13 PL N 61 S 57 N 21 S 21 NO SO N <1 S <l NO SO B NO 50 NO SO AB G VG h - B N/A VG R N/A t •• 88WH IjOB in mmj liTr—inn $nr n ftvm Attrmmivr • S « Vhd'olfl. f>r - Duf Cmtr Crnt •. M • MtHiicifsl, C • ClMifHM. H • Hknwir BiwiftHPrf IMPACT OF ALTERNATIVE !N FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP CIUTEIUON 1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 1. NMnbcrof Imaiui retourccf within the conidor.* 0 IH(M)1H(M)1H(M)0 0 1M(M) 2. No. of locitnion itwurect in conidor. (r « null, L * Lakes, Q • Golf Counei) 0 0 0 A 0 0 0 3. No. of itahknlhl units/propcftici in corridor (inctudinf fatmstewb). 0 o oN JO S:I0 13 7 10 12 4. No. of butinetica in corridor.0 3 3 1 0 0 1 . S. Eat. cofialfOOlMNi coat (milUona of 1990 S).NOT AP PL 1C AB L E 6. Aeccaairililjf (Iravd time) to Metro Area. (O Good, VO * Very Good, VP = Very Fsor) VP G G G G VG VG 7. Appropriate Mfhwoy access for local deodopmenlT (Y *> Yes| Y Y Y Y Y Y Y •. No. of rcsidciieea srilhin 400 feet of highway, outside the corridor. 24 N:19 S:19 N:I9 S;19 22 n 7 20 ^ 9. No. of mdand and floodplain acrea in corridor.0 9 9 13 26 41 30 10. No. of woodland acrea in corridor.0 1 1 B 4 23 27 lie No. of acrea of agriculturil land in corridor.0 136 136 149 I 4a \ 44 173 177 12. No. ofacrcoof Ag. Preserves bntilsnd in eocsidof. 0 6 6 6 r ■“ 6 1 1 1 1 13. Sofelp and dfickacy of trafTie on eusting TH 12. 0> - Prir, 0 - Good, VO - Very Good) F VG VG VG G G VG 14. Local lialfio movement acroai/adjaccnt to osWogTH 12. (P « Fair, G Good) F F F F G G F IS. Level of aervieo on caiit. TH 12 in peak hour.**E A A A C C A iC. Lovol of asfvieeon TH 12 akcmalive in peak boor.** E A A A A A A 17. No. of counly/local roads likely to need capacity knptovsiiimts. 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 r. I: Ie-: f I' Wont LOS in any location for a given Altcmaiivc.• S = Schools. DC - Dty Care Centers, M * Munteipal, C « Churclics, H *» Htatoric Slnidurei IT-- IMPACT OF ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY - HENNEPIN COUNTY CRTTERION 1 2 2A 2B 2C I 2D 2E 2F 2G 3 3A 3B 3C 4 4A 4B 1. Nunritcr of bumnn mourcci within the 0 2H 211 211 2H 211 3M 3h*3M lit IM IM IM N:IS N:IS N;IS cocrklor.*IM IM 1C.IM IM IM IM S:2S S:2S S:2S 2. No. of locfcalMNi mouieei in corncSor.0 2P 2P IP 0 0 2P IP IP IP IP 0 0 N-.2P N:2P N:2P (P w Pufci» L ■■ Lnkct, G » Golf Courses)SriP.IO S:2P,IO S:1P.1G S. No. of retidentiAl unhi/propcftict in corridor.0 S5 85 72 105 104 109 129 128 65 66 70 52 N:76 N;62 N:76 S:68 S:S4 S.69 4. No. of butuicHCO in corridor.c 58 58 58 34 1 21 0 0 0 1 0 1 N:l N;21 N;2 1 S:1 S:21 S:2 5. Eft. comtnictkw coil (millioni of 1990 $).0 50 70 65 55 55 80 80 75 30 35 35 40 40 45 45 6. Acccfii>ilil]r (invel lime) to Metro A.*c9. (P ■ Ftk. 0 ■ Good) 7. Appnprirto Mglwwy acerti for local devcIopOMNt? (Y • Yea) 1. No. of icaidencea widiin 400 feet of highway.276 191 191 238 14S 158 157 168 178 94 84 86 76 N;74 N;99 N:64 ouUlde the corridor.S:90 S:103 S:80 9. No. r ad end floodplatn acres in corridor.0 45 45 62 61 43 52 69 51 27 45 42 60 N:55 N:S9 N:73 S:52 S:S6 • 70 10. No. of woodland acres in corridor.0 19 19 25 45 67 h’71 96 90 97 91 N:lll N:7B i4:10S1S:107 S;74 S:101 11. No. of eoce of africullural land b coriMlor.0 36 36 36 36 92 1 36 1 36 92 92 36 92 36 92 36 36 12. No. of acres of Ag. Preserves tarmlsnd in 0 39 39 39 (>4 28 39 64 28 28 64 28 64 21 39 64 corridor. 13. Salnijf and efiteiency of Iraflio on esisling Til p G Fr G G F G G G G G G G P O G 12. (F - Fair, Q - Good. P “ Poor) p F F F F F F F G G P G F P P P TH 12. (P w Phir. G - Good. F » Poor) IS. Level of Mrvieo oo eaial. TH 12 b peak hour.**F D E D E E E E E D E B e D 0 D Id. Levd of aeiviee oo TM 12 ahemalive b peak p D E D E F B c c E E c c D D D hour.** 17. No. of eounty/iooal roads likely lo neec: wapacity 3 2 2 1 4 'f 5 3 4 6 6 6 5 6 7 6 •• Wont LOS in nny Incalion Ibr ^ t’ivcn Ahcnucivr.^ S - ScIhniIs, DC Day Care Centers, M « . C «■ Churchca, H * Hlitorie Stmeturea i.. IMPACT OF ALTFRNATIVF. SUMMARY - WRIGHT COUNTY CRITERION 1 Vi D2 D3 D4 l>5 I>6 f I • Number of hL.inmn resources \^ilhifi Ihe corridor.^ 0 tll(M)lll(M)IH(M)0 0 lll(M) 2. No. of reertmion resources in co'ridor. (P « Psrkf, L = Lakes, G = Golf Courses) 0 N:IP SIP NIP SIP 2P ?P 0 0 2. No. of resideiUlnl units/propertiet in corriclot (iiicludmg faniisteeds). 0 N:18 S:18 N;m S 18 2ft 70 12 17 4. No. of businestet h covc,-^. ’0 N:23 S:16 N:23 S:16 ?l 0 1 a S. Cst. constnidkni cost (millions of 1990 S).0 30 30 20 20 20 25 6. Acce^siMIHy (travel lime) !o Metro Area. (G « Go* VO = 'Cy Good, VP = Very Poor) VP G <•t;r, 1 v<; 1 VG 1 1 V 1 7. Appropritle highwiy bcccss for local d^lopmenlT (Y = Yes) Y Y Y Y \Y Y i - 8. No. of residcficef within 400 feet of highway, outfide the corridor. 86 NB. S-76 N 80 S;76 77 56 10 36 9. No. of wetland and floodplain acres in corridor.0 N 30 S:30 N:30 S:30 23 My 41 30 lO. No. of woodbmd acres in corridor.0 N:l 1 *•! 1 N:l S:1 8 4 33 17 11. No. of aerri of agricukunl land in corridor.0 137 137 H9 157 173 W7 12. No. of acres of Ag. Picservcs farmland bi conidor. 0 6 6 6 44 44 6 1 12. Safety and cflkfeocy'' f trsIFic on eaiiline TII 12. (P « F»!r, P » fVor, VO = Very Cc„ *) p VC VG G F F G 12. (P - IW, V = Good, P - Poor. VC ^ Vc.7 Cze^, p F F F F F % !.s. Level of servfce on exist. TH 12 in peak hour.**E B D E E E F. IS. Level of service on Tfl 12 ahemative in |teak boor.** E B B B R i V 1 17. No. of coimly/local .oada likely lo need capacity iitipfovcmcnif. 0 0 0 0 0 t 1 1 ! • i" •• Won! KOS in iny locpiinn for n .rjveit AltrmR*iv^,• S “ SrhooU. nr - r>/iv r«rr Tmlrr^. M Municipal. C ^ r?iiirrhr^ If =» IfHnrie SiniCtItm ■ ■ V '?'• f.- 1'. ft!:. ■>A ‘i ft i s- M?-' iSisi SEP 1 5 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT MEETING AGENDA TECHNICAL REVIEW COMITTEE FOR LAKE MINNETONKA September 19. 1991 8:00 A.M. I. Discussion & Approval of Minutes of Sept. 5, AS®oda II. Land Use Districts (Pick / City Reps.) A. Continued use of existing districts B. Required upgrading - when & how C. Types of Shoreland districts: permitted & conditional uses III. Lot Sizes (Pick / City Reps.) A. Single family sewered / unsewered sizes & rationale ^’r B.Duplexes / triplexes / quads KJ C.Existing lots of record ■ - •IV.Planned Unit Developments (Prestin / A.Residential E-B.Commercial . <C.Conversions 1-1 V.Future Meeting Topics / Schedule A.Next meeting (10/3) - stormwater B.Future meetings ‘Vt .•> k- % 1:' ¥tvI: Ci ■W i ' V X !/•' fW LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT MINUTES TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMlllEE (IRC) Meeting of Sept. 5. 1991 Norwest Bank BuildinC Conference Hoorn 900 E. Wayzata Blvd.. Wayzata ATTENDENCE (See attached list) I. Minutes Minutes of the Aug. 22 TRC meeting were approved. II. Shoreland District Boundaries. Ed Pick passed out copies of a diagram illustrating the shoreland districts for lakes (1000 ft.) and rivers (300 ft., or to the limit of a flood plain if further) which are specified in Minnesota Statutes. Section 103F.205. Subd. 4. He and Ceil Strauss explained that since the districts are defined in statute, needed flexibility must usually be achieved through standards in land use districts rather than by altering the shoreland district. One exception to this is the possibility of reducing the district depth if a topographic divide can be identified, as provided for in the shoreland regulations. A. * B. Lake Minnetonka anJ Tributary Streams Steve Prestin pointed out that since the only streams entering or leaving the shoreland area of Lake Minnetonka are classified Tributary' and the lake is 'General Development." conflicts in areas of overlap will be minimal because these two classes have the same dimensional standards. He did. however, caution members to check the regulations for possible conflicts in specified uses. C. Overlap Situations Ed Pick said that where lake and str im shoreland districts overlap, the 1000 foot lake distric should be used - unless the stream is in a class with more restrictive standards. If the district for one lake overlaps that for another, the boundary between the two should usually be the topographic divide, but other considerations such as existing property lines and zoning district boundaries can also be evaluated. E. District Boundary Options DNR can also consider shoreland district boundaries are not curvel inear. paralleling the shore such or zoning district boundaries. However, if such a boundary occassional ly is closer than 1000 feet, as runoff and visibility would need to be evaluated before it could be accepted. Ceil Strauss explained that they have an intern working on deve I oping I ists lakes and streams, including those whose into another city, and ordinary high water elevations for each of the cities. III. Bluffs atul Slopes A . Ident i f y 1 Bluffs. Impact /;.onrs . Steep Slopes Ed Pick distributed copies of ttie DNH criteria for bluffs and steep slopes, diagrams of bluffs and bluff impact zones, and excerpts from the Statement of NeetJ and Measonab1eness for the Shoreland Regulations regarding bluffs. Ceil Strauss explained a problem that has developed in some instances in identifying the top-of-bluff due to the 50 foot increment slope measurement method. She went on to explain that they have developed some alternative language and methodology for dealing with the problem. Ed Pick said he would provide members a copy of this at the next meeting. Joel Settles inquired whether the regulations preclude the possibility of installing a sewage treatment system in the bluff impact zone between a house and the lop-of-bluff if the land is flat enough. Pd indicated the regulations do not prohibit this, so he cautioned members who might have such situations to consider addressing this issue in their controls to prevent possible slumping of the bluff from saturation with sewage effluent. B. Mapping Issues Considerable discussion occurred regarding the identification of bluff and steep slope areas. Since most of the cities do not have their own detailed topographic mapping, they will have to rely on a combination of existing sources and. if they deem it appropriate, detailed topographic mapping of individual development sites supplied by the landowner/applicant. Joel Settles said the only wide-coverage information available is the USGS topographic maps (iO foot contour interval) and the soil survey maps, which should be used with caution because the field data was collected many years ago and there have been extensive man made alterations of the landscape over the years. Several members Indicated they require applicants to supply detailed topographic mapning (2 foot intervals), but there is occasional IV objection to this by applicants because of the cost. Ed Pick indicated it is up to each city to decide whether to map their bluff and steep slope areas, or J-o require applicants to supply the information. Gene Strororaen supplied members with a copy of a list of potential u areas from a LMCD working paper. There was additional discussion regarding additional bluff issues, including multiple bluffs and those created by road construction. Jay Blake mentioned that Minnetrista currently manages slopes by prohibiting development on those steeper than JOX and ••conditionally” allowing it on those from 18% to 30X ir the applicant supplies various information and designs tne work to reduce impacts. IV. Next Meeting Members decided to discuss the issues of land use districts, lot sizes, and planned unit developments at the next meeting. Stormwater management options will be covered at the following meeting. "ir-i • t: \ W- • # JT', (jj^>Y\ /JT'/ / VI !:^-v .........■"' j fl|o*»'*^ /)?/''-• > /?/// r- l4\4i^irv, \^/m I 'Y/<^ I i^CU4 j^e/ Z^'fflcs f I • i: ♦ }i f ii • I OU^ /-/ , ^ cc/^rif^ i^f\y % /J <'^'// ^10i3\stU:^ ^p>rin^ 'PittliL, /uicuuD )}!(fV.\ ' ^ ',’ \ w P iM.Cb ■ .-acJtviht :r-^‘^W.g.tia..iWy».-A-----^.^.A. i ' n i" \i ,,'■ V., f, kii'; fy ’■■ r> fk •, ■. >’. w ili #:f r ‘ ii i'k! >'v. k ‘-•V I" MIMUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 278 HELD ON AUGUST 12. 1991 The regular meeting of the School Board of Orono Independent School District No. 278 was held on Monday. August 12. 1991. Present: David McKown Don Anderson James Franklin Peg Swanson Martha Van de Ven Thomas Mich Neal Lawson Board member John Maresh arrived while the meeting was in progress. UPON MOTION by Jim Franklin, seconded by Don Anderson, the consent agenda was approved as follows: - approved the appointment of Linda Hermann as a part-time speech teacher at Schumann Elementary for the 1991-92 school year; - Spooled thevpointment of Paul R. Hamilton as a science teacher at the middle school for the 1991-92 school year; - approved the ice arena lease for the 1991-92 school year as follows: Lease on file in the District Office. n 0 ..-.o 111 tl IS iliij 'UP. 11 1991 i- - approved the following new fall classes for Community Education: Little lykes Pieichool Millie, Mom or Dad A Me Cultiiral Awaienesi for Children (Russian, Afitican, Asian, Latin) Oreative Dramatics Holiday Theme Parties ncnj Singaloni *$B*TV(SclraiiiamiE)em.) Hoc Off The ftesi” (Middle School Newspaper) Rocketry Ski dob Cookinf for Babysitters Babysiiicn Baf of THcks Jewcliy Maldag Ballioom Dance Antkpes Hardwood Floor Refinlshing Upholsienf Putting Your Yard A Garden to Bed for the Winter Fitness Walking Seminar Saturday Holiday Extravaganza Decorating for the Holidays Extra Special Holiday Tables Stained Class Ornament Chinese Cooking Wooden Reindeer Muslin Doll Tor Kids Sake” Speaker Series Foreign Languages (Ihke Home Courses) Humor Seminar Small Business Series Learning Styles ParentAThild Hair Bows and Jewelry Making Lifeguard Training NOTE: scheduling oonflictt could require a course to be postponed until Winter quarter. k :<■ s =» V IS- ■ - approved the Activity Fund Report for fourth quarter, 1991; - approved the Activity Fund Annual Report - approved the bills as covered by vouchers 070412 through 070829 and construction bills as covered by vouchers 1396 through 1432. - directed the Superintendent to approve teacher contracts froffl August 12. 1991 to September 9, 1991 in order to help assure a full component of qualified teachers for the 1991-92 school year. Hotion carried. Board member Maresh absent. Or. Mich informed the Board that Ron Gilbert was hospitalized on August 10 while vacationing in Cheyenne, Uyoming, that he is making good progress toward recovery and that the Board will be kept informed as we receive more infor mation. Or. Mich reported that the summer has been both busy and productive with the completion of many projects in preparation for the coming school year; that a great deal of time was spent this summer reviewing/studying finances and the capital needs of the District and that a meeting with the Facilities Committee will be held sometime this fall for the purpose of considering a bond levy; that a retreat for administrators will be held on August 13; that the picnic for summer workers will be held on August 15 and Board members are invited to attend; that the new teacher orientation day will be helJ on August 23 and Board members are invited to attend; that preschool workshop begins on August 26 with Warren Nelson as the speaker for the opening session; that he was distributing Information regarding the proposed outcome-based graduation rule; that legisla tion now requires that a student be appointed to serve as an advisory member to the Board of Education or that a youth advisory council should be established to make formal or informal recommendations to the Board of Education and would meet with the Board at least three times a year and it was the consensus of the Board that Doug Erickson and the student council develop a proposal to be brought to the Board; that the Supervision/Evaluation Committee will continue to work on peer review as legislation mandates that this process be enacted by 1993; that the City of Orono has announced that a public hearing will be held on August 19 regarding use of the land across from the campus and Neal Lawson and Peg Swanson will pursue this issue with the city; that ^ard members will receive by mail, within the next few days, the school calendar, the monthly newsletter and also bus schedules which after this year will be published in the PIONEER; that work continues on the District's Annual Report. Peg Swanson reported that negotiations have begun with the teachers and that progress is being made. Dave McKown brought to the attention of the Board an article in the MINNESOTA MONTHLY magazine which mentions the Orono School District and he stated that copies will be made available to Board members. Neal Lawson updated the Board on the progress/completion dates of the surnner projects that were approved by the Board last spring. UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by Jim Franklin, the Board of Education accepted the bid of Ridgedale Electric for lighting for the high school parking lot. I r I' r r I4 . I’ .V f: »! :%■ ' tr-; I I -p:wM- ' ('~yh Carried unanimously. UPON MOTION by Martha Van de Ven, seconded by John Maresh, the Board of Education accepted the bid from Meyer Bros. Dairy for furnishing milk for the 1991-92 school year. Carried unanimously. Board member Jim Franklin introduced the resolution that the life i..surance contract be awarded to Mutual of Omaha, lowest proposal, at $.194/S1,000 basic and $.03/$l,000 ADfcD and that the long term disability insurance contract be awarded to Schools Insurance Fund, lowest proposal, at .41* of covered payroll using a conditional 12 month rate credit of -.04*. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member John Maresh, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Anderson, Franklin, Van de Ven, Maresh, Swanson, McKown and the following voted against the same: None whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Dave McKown welcomed Senator Gen Olson and Commissioner Tad Jude to the Board of Education meeting. Connie Fladeland presented the 1991-92 Improvement Goals to the Board and pro vided background information for the Board on the development of these goals. Ms. Fladeland stated that these goals are a part of the Planning-Evaluating-Reporting (PER) process for the School District and that special education and music were the focus of a self-study and were visited by a North Central Accreditation (NCA) team and along with input from the PER Committee, recommendations for improvement were formulated for each of these curricular areas. UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by Jim Franklin, the Board of Education approved the 1991-92 Improvement Goals as follows: Establish a committee to review present psychological services and to develop options for enhancing available services. Improve communication and strengthen the relationship between special and regular education through the use of staff development and inser vice training. Implement a joint program between Early Childhood Family Education (ECFE) and Early Childhood Special Education (ECSE), providing an integrated education experience for preschool age children. fe I r. •:r p-v I iv k- li I -f '.^!’ n\ I.. f'lH ■I K-‘ ? I- Oevelop and offer a general music course, open to all students, as a part of the high school curriculum. Explore possibilities for improving the use of technology in the area of music education. The Community Education Compliance meeting was held with Toni Bergland intro ducing Melanie Deluca, the new Community Education Director, to the Board of Education. Ms. Deluca briefly addressed the information the Board had received In their packets that provides a perspective on the philosophy of Community Education as well as the components that fall under the umbrella of Community Education. Ms. Deluca introduced the following staff members who provided an overview of their particular area of responsibility: Brian Bergstrom, Summer Recreation/Pool Director; Mitzi Overland, Early Childhood Family Education Coordinator: and Jo Potter, School Age Child Care Coordinator. Melanie Deluca closed the meeting with a brief overview of the goals for the coming year. Appreciation was expressed to Melanie Deluca, Toni Bergland, and the Community Education staff for their work/efforts in developing/monitoring these impressive programs that provide an added dimension for the Orono School District Comnunity. The Board of Education meeting was recessed at 8:35 p.m. for five minutes. Regarding the 1991 payatle 1992 property tax levy, Neal Lawson reminded the Board that action tonight is for the proposed levy only, the official certified levy Is required to be af*proved following the public hearing. UPON MOTION by Jim Franklin, seconded by Jor.n Maresh, the Board of Education directed the Clerk to certify the 1991 payable 1992 property tax levy on or before September 3, 1991 and the Board of Education set a public hearing for the 1991 payable 1992 property tax levy on December 9, 1991 at 7:00 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Or. Mich reported to the Board that the legislature has provided that individual school districts may control the Intermediate Vocational and Special Education levy. In order for the levy to continue as in the past with Hennepin Technical College controlling the levy, it is necessary that each of the thirteen cooperating school districts pass a resolution in the month of August which would authorize Intermediate District No. 287 to levy the Intermediate District levy. Member Jim Franklin introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LEVY BY INTERMEDIATE DISTRICT NO. 287 IfttEREAS, the 1991 Legislature adopted a statutory provision (Law of Minnesota 1991, Chapte»* 265, Article 6, Section 39) providing the member districts of Intermediate District 287 with the power to authorize Intermediate District No. 287, as a single taxing District, to levy the Intermediate District levy. rr r Hr i' ■i-r rp I iv.- \j'i* • • r i %r- NOW« THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by a majority of the full membership of the School Board on Independent School District No. 278 that it authorizes Intermediate District 287 to levy the Intermediate District levy as a single taxing district. The motion for the adopt -n of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member Don Anderson, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Anderson, Franklin, Van de Ven, Maresh, Swanson, McKown and the following voted against the same: None whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Discussion ensued with Senator Gen Olson regarding the Intermediate Vocational and Special Education levy as well as the legislative action which mandates that the District representative on the HTC Board be an elected Board member from our District beginning in 1992-93. Dr, Mich presented the District Level Goals to the Board stat ■•q that these goals help to provide focus for the school year and to continal ly improve the general operation of the schools and School District. UPON MOTION by Jim Franklin, seconded by John Maresh, the Board of Education approved the 1991-92 District Level Goals as follows: Establish a process for the on-going development, promulgation. Implementation and review of District policies and procedures. Implement a process for the development of a long-range plan (3-5 years) which focuses on Board of Education approved areas of concentration. Notion carried unanimously. Mr. McKown stated that the next agenda item involves the administration's proposal that a student be excluded from school for the 1991-92 school year. He stated that legal counsel for the district has advised that any information relating to this agenda Item which identifies or could be used to identify the student is private data under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (Minnesota Statute Section 13.32). Counsel also advises that under the Open Meeting Law (Minnesota Statute Section 471.705, Subdivision (d)) in order for the administration to Inform the Board as to the facts underlying the recommen dation for exclusion a portion of this meeting must be closed to the public. Any discussion which the School Board wishes to have regarding the resolution must take place during the closed esslon. No agenda item except the proposed exclusion will be discussed during v'e closed session. rii?-•1 • f It ••r.-r i'I I '•t Mr. McKown informed the public that following the discussion, the public portion of the meeting will resume and the School Board will vote on the exclusion resolution. The administration expects that the closed session will take about twenty (20) minutes and the meeting will resume at 9:35 p.m. Mr. McKown requested a resolution to close the meeting in order to discuss private data. Jim Franklin MOVED, John Maresh ‘•?conded, that the meeting be closed to the public in order to allow the discussion of private data involving a student who has been proposed for exclusion. At 10:15 p.m., the School Board’s public meeting resumed. Mr. McKown stated that he would now entertain a resolution proposing to exclude a student and he reminded Board members that there can be no discussion during the public meeting of the student's identity or of any facts which could result in the identification of the student. lember Jim Franklin introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: BE IT RESOLVED that in accordance with the proceedings to exclude a student from attendance at Orono High School for the 1991-92 school year that the student be and hereby is dismissed and terminated. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member John Maresh, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Anderson, Franklin, Van de Ven, Maresh, Swanson, McKown and the following voted against the same: None whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. UPON MOTION by John Maresh, seconded by Don Anderson, the meeting adjourned. was Approved: Dave McKown7 Chafnnan m ;.t^- i M3S "HI \ > JHb-'m't~^£££.iXf 1^- li. ^B '".0-^m i %:m ■: :^- \]r: ' 'V. . ‘ ■:M^M:J ■ ■ ;;V Hui ■0 ' "•■■-"■‘"--*‘**^MIII^'- r■ te®:.'.. *' fei m ... •■ i- ": >; .«■ :v;::H:; 't ■■;:•■ • •., ■■ ■:'■• ..■-■•■• f-' ■■■■-'■''' •'- . m -'\Ul f. n ■ . ;V t fMHi ft >i|f ^ Jl.. i‘J'7# Itf Cu«r*^ NiUi ITortAot < p, p - lk>o )f /?4^>4r<2^ ^/O* ^7 ‘^7_^77.o ^/9.V7. r'. > ■* J' jp .* # ?; f.^ V ‘ PLMO : B-SD-V OUNOCl NUMSERY i LANDSCAPE CO ______<*^3iu- pt^cfjke^________ s-i«n *«%t» f- ''S k *> |SS^-'• ■■'' ': If:-:' W -■m4 i 4- w SCALE o DENOTES C R Y" -y - ■ T -A L. NgD»0»‘l7"w e«ao6 .......- •. .**• . vV •*r * .. A, - • •’ • >- .R 0 F \ LOT ■ 1 A D N89N5'26*W 681.30 L*.,._.„..... 200 IN MONUMENT rtET ■EANINOS SHOWN ANE BASEO UPON N ASSUMED DATUM. i TOWN ' HALL R N eyis'26"w 377; 31 LOT OPAINAGC a UTH.ITT CASEMENTS SHOWN THUS* 9. LITT CASEMCI it..: N09*IS'26*W !J, S i HWY ' WO. 57 7 3! KINO 5 00 rCCT IN WIDTH AND AOJONNC LOT LINES. ANO KINO 10.00 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOMINO STNCE T LINES AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT, VAN ^'5'^''"’’’°’^ •m^ ^ ■ -y*. ' i ■ ‘ri' Wim: •> *»-. :-n- 1 mmMil ■ ^: - M' I I ms. \ :r" / W" :«r’walBI WPl ’ <3«K-.: \ / ’i f-r ■ .'/ / A. mmm>w-wism a?^:;jiii: a;,aaa-^ ■' ■'^'a-'; ■■■:: r- p / mm \/ wmm:::& ■' f»:: / ■/ \/ ®r ''1 ■ppp'-\ \ ..... lfflBKi«iiilS Si li»»l»aa- « K»«a«S 20 wM.t. |,.,s •lorih.o.slerly of h lino drawn - rrm (.:.o ^oar ;,nc l« L!.e sl.orelifi,. said loL and i....i„.,y '' '" ■••“ck I, •• Wil"y's "ark". Lake mnnoionka and also that pa-t of Lot 22, niork ! «*rr.a lyin.j -outl..,asU.r I y o' a line d-awn «or thoasU-rl y : m.n a point nri l.hi* Southwesu-rly l.ne'oi sail .wosKvIy of the innst Southerly corner of said lot. r„o.i.j!i a point distant 12.b .eet 'torthwesLer ly o • :• nt i:ieasu~od alonq a line drawn From a point on said .loutheasterly line distant 2/3.b feet HortIieas..e-Iy .oint on tl.c Northwesterly line o' said lot distant f«et northeasterly of most westerly corner o s led "lat thereor. Hennepin County. Minnesota. pWBi <»n oi an existing house and driveway in relation to the aDove described property. It does not .provemenls or encroachments, other than existing visible hardcover. >n an assumed datum. 'kS