Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
08-12-1991 Council Packet
r I'r- Iv.'* I- W-- Planninq CDPJnission PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED EELOV; FOP OUF. CITY RECORDS. ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 1. /'UTAT^iV''^'>\6’C /^AS V'--., ('ktA ■u f/o » 4. /i Poj/v U<fT7V4-.iA-^' )( C/L. V-^\irE C C J. 0.*^ 1 5. rJ^»' li ' 6. hlh C Lcc-^’fi V> /'i/?, > ,^ yty, 7. '•1 |vH<a.U>' ,. ’ v"rn 3 / /"T> . t A'- ' f ' l —V u_______________ 9. Jr /;. . )//SA/^T/; A’5V '"! 0. - /At-'V -- • I 1. 2. 3 . 4. 5. 6. .7. .8.11 .9. :o . AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, AUGUST 12, 1991, 7:00 P.M. (*)Asterisk items are considered to oe routine items to oe enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent item* on the agenda. Discussion will oe held upon request. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. ROLL CALL 1. CONSENT AGENDA* APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 2. Regular Meeting of July 22, 1991 * 3. Special Meeting of July 23, 1991 * 4. Special Meeting of July 30, 1991 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Alex Vongries - Vice Chair 5. Orono Sewer Site/Planning Assistance %0 PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS • Candace Rowlette Representative PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Linit 5 Minutes Per Person) r.ONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT **APPLICANTS** Ionlonediately after the Council has reviewed your application please sign the three (3) original resolutions at the Recorder's desk. Applicants need not execute resolutions for subdivisions, vacations and denials. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Big Island Inc. - Record Lots 12 & 19 #1606 and # 1660 - Conditional Use Permit/Var i a nee - Resolution #1659 - Vacation of Public Right of Way - Resolution #1647 Gerald Benoit, 3403 Eastlake ^jtreet - variances - Resolution #1662 Richard & Collette Roberts, 1937 Fagerness Point Road - Variances - Resolution #i.664 William H. Bockman, 1090 Loma Linda Avenue - Variances •> Resolution #1665 Thomas McCarthy, 1424 Baldur Park Road - Variances #1487 Art Center of Minnesota, 2180 North Shore Drive - Clarification Regarding Required Improvements BNGINBB7>.*S REPORT 12. Bid Award * 13. Bid Award Lift Station #11 1991 Seal Coat HATOR/COONCIL REPORT CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 14. Appointments Resolution Amendment 1992 Budget Discussion Loan to HRA - Resolution City Facilities - Brochure Shoreland Grant Agreement 15. 16. 17. 18. AGENDA FOR COONCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, AUGUST 12, 1991, 7:00 P.M u I I CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Continued 19. Contract - City Recorder Lake Use Committee - Minutes Discipline - Temporary Employee Police Chief Employment - Acceptance of Letter of Agreement Temporary Employment Golf Course Temporary Employment Golf Course - Groundskeeper -.elper Equipment Purchase - Public Works Sewer Pond Elevation 985 Tonkawa Road - Resolution ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION Walter Quality Report - Summit Park Administrator's Goals Fenholt Retirement Letter 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28.& Casco Point Beaches CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT LICBHSBS (29*) BILE.8 (30*) ADJOURNMENT OPCOMIMG ISSUES AND EVENTS 08/12 - Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. 08/13 - Facilities Design Committee 5:00 p.m. Room 107L Orono Education Link gg/XS - Council Breakfas*" w/Adrainistrator Candidates 8:03 a.ra. Lafayette Club , 08/J-5 — Council Interview Administrator Candidates Starting 3.30 p.m. Room 107L Orono Education Link 08/19 - Planning Commission 7:00 p.m. 08/20 - Facilities Design Committee 5:00 p.m. Room 107L Orono Education Link 08/24 - Saturday - Public Information Meeting & Tour 9 a.m,-ll a.m. 08/26 - Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. 08/27 - Facilities Design Committee 5:00 p.m. Room 107L Orono Education Link 08/28 - 7:00 p.m. Public Hearing - Facilities - Council Chambers 09/02 - Monday Holiday - Labor Day f 4 - f;' MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 22. 1991 Counciimember City Staff: and Zoninq Cr ROLL CALL: '4^ The Council met on the above date with the follov/iny memi^ present: Mayor Barbara Peterson, CounciImembers J. Dia Goetten, Edward Callahan, and Gabriel Jabbour. Buvler was absent. The following represented the City Administrator Mark Bernhardson, Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, City Attorney Thomas Barrett, City Engineer Glenn Cook. City Clerk Dorothy Hallin, Finance Director Thomas Kuehn, and City Recorder Laurie Scheffler. Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. (#1*)CONSENT AGENDA Jeanne Mabusth, on behalf of Dianne Jentilucci, a concerned property owner residing at 1295 Briar Street, asked that item #9 be removed from the Consent Agenda. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve the Consent Agenda, with the exception of item #9, which was removed and discussed in the sequence shown on the Agenda. All voted aye. Motion passed. PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING ESTABLISHMENT OF HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY The Affidavit of Publication was duly noted, Peterson opened the Public Hearing at 7:02 p.m. and Mayor Bernhardson informed those in attendance that a Public Hearing is required prior to the establishment of a Housing Redevelopment Authority (HRA). He advised that the Resolution regarding the establishment of an hra had been published in the "Laker" and "Pioneer" newspapers. Bernhardson explained that the HRA would be a separate entity which will allow the City to undertake certain housing activities that it may otherwise not undertake. Members of the Orono City Council may comprise the entire membership of the HRA Board of Commissioners, and would then have full control of the HRA's activities. Mayor Peterson asked for public input. Dianne Jentilucci, 1295 Briar Street, asked if this was the first HRA the City of Orono has established. Bernhardson stated that as far he is aware, this is the first HRA the City would establish, if Council votes to do so. He noted that at some point in the past, the City had considered establishing an HRA, but had not proceeded. Ms. Jentilucci asked why the City was considering the establishment of an HRA at this point in time. - 1 - CRONO CITY CCUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 22, 1991 HRA PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED Bernhardson replied, "The City is lookina at this, among other things, as an option that the City could, if it wanted to establish, choose to undertake a purchase agreement in accordance with the City facilities, to take care of dilapidated buildings in this area, and hopefully improve the existing site by removing the City buildings, and creating new buildings that are habitable." Ms. Jentilucci asked if establishing an HRA had anything to do with the construction of public housing. Bernhardson stated that there is no requirement that this property must be developed with public housing facilities. It could remain as a park, once the existing buildings are demolished, or sold to private developers. Ms. Jentilucci indicated that she would like to see the Post Office remain in its present location. Norm Paurus, 2500 Casco Point Road, stated that the City has the legal ability to set up an HRA, but believed that the issue of setting up an HRA is different than funding an HRA. He said. "It is my understanding that if a city sets up an HRA, and it is funded out of taxes of any kind, that a referendum is required. I may be wrong." Bernhardson stated that he and the City Attorney had researched that issue with the city's Bond Consultant, and are not aware of such a requirement. He said, "Generally, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority have not had to go with a referendum, and a lease/purchase does not require a referendum. If the City were to do a lease/purchase, it is deemed as bonds from another governmental unit. Secondly, HRA's, offer ways of doing Tax Increment Financing projects, where the increased value of the property generates additional tax increment and that is used to pay off the bonds. That also requires no referendum. The use of General Obligation bonds, which would be backed by the City, with no other funding source other than taxes, may have required a referendum." Paurus said, "The bonds would be General Obligation because there is no other source of income other than taxes." Carolyn Drude, Ehlers and Associates, Inc., financial consultant to the City, explained, "If the City establishes an HRA, and the HRA issues a lease revenue bond, it is payable from annual appropriations by the City, which could be taxes, or could be other kinds of appropriations. The bonds are not General Obligations." Paurus asked, "Since the revenues are to pay for a new City - 2 - I' % ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 22, 1991 it HRA PUBLIC HEAPING CONTINUED Hall, where else, other than from taxes, woold the revenues come?" Drude replied, "I am not making any statement about the revenue source, I am stating that the bonds are not General Obligation. The bonds are essentially a revenue bond, and do not have the General Obligation feat'ires," Bernhardson added, "In answer to Norm's question, what is being considered for funding sources is not only taxes, but interest earned on existing monies, plus som.e of the principle the City has set aside." Paurus said, "That is not what I understood the Attorney General's Office to say. They indicated that if it is funded in any way by tax income, then a referendum is necessary." John Farnham stated that he too had spoken with the Attorney General's Office and had understood the same thing Mr. Paurus had indicated. He said, "Another issued raised by the Attorney General was something called arbitrage. Does our City Attorney know what that means?" Barrett indicated that he is familiar with arbitrage. Charlie Kelley said, "If I understand this correctly, the Council appoints itself to the Authority, and the HRA issues the bonds, takes in the money, as a separate legal entity outside the City, and uses the money to purchase the land and/or building. Does the HRA own the building or the land?" Callahan answered, "That depends on v . ?ther we sell tnei.t rhe land or we allow them to build a buildinc jr. our land." Kelley said, "Title to the land could be in the name of the City, and the HRA could have title to the building. The City would make monthly lease payments to the HRA, and the payment would cover interest and some amortization on the bond. Would the type of bond used in this case carry a higher interest rate than General Obligation bonds?" Carolyn Drude replied, "It would be fair to say that the mortgage bonds may be 10 to 15 basis points higher than general obligation bonds in a given market. In the case of the City of Orono, it is hard to say, because the City has such a high bond rating." Kelley commented that it appears as though the City is guaranteeing the bonds even though an HRA is being established. He asked if the HRA is anticipating the placement of a ceiling on the dollar amounts that may be taken out. He also asked if at - 3 - i! ' ORONO CITY COUNCIL ^EETING HELD JULY 22, 1991 HRA PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED some point the City intends ‘o rescind the HRA so that i be indefinitely utilized for jcher projects. cannot Goetten advised that conditions, which include a limited time period, will be incorporated into the establishment of the HRA. However, there has been no discussion on placinc a ceiling on the amount of bonds tc be issued through the HRA. Bernhardson stated that as long as there are outstanding bonds, the HRA cannot be dissolved. Mayor Petersen indicated that it may be appropriate to limit the amount of bonds issued as a condition of establishing the HRA. Jabbour agreed with Mayor Peterson. There were no additional comments from the public regarding this matter, and Mayor Peterson closed the Public Hearing at 7:20 p.m It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution -2998, making the necessary findings for the implementation of a Housing and Pedevelooment Authority within the City of Orono. Callahan read, aloud, the Resolution for the benefit of those persons attending the Public Hearing on this matter. Motion, Ayes-3, Mayor Peterson, Nay. Motion passed. lu was moved by Callahan, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to appoint the members of the Orono City Council as the menbers of the Board of Directors of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, and that they serve until their successors are elected, or until one month after their term expires, v/hichever occurs first. Jabbour indicated that he would like Charlie Kelley to serve on the Board of Directors. Callahan indicated that such an appointment would likely occur during the HRA meeting, which would follow this meeting. All voted aye. Motion passed. (f2)RESOLUTIOM OF APPRECIATION-LAURIE SCHEFFLER RESOLUTION #2988 Mayor Peterson presented Laurie Scheffler with a Resolution of Appreciation for her service to the City as its City Recorder. .^.^crie thanked Mayor Peterson, miss everyone very much. and stated that she would (#3*)APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve the Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting held July 8, 1991. All voted aye. Motion passed. - 4 - i: ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 22, 1991 (#4)LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT Orono's LMCD Representative, JoEllen Hurr, was present. She reported that Lakeside Marina did reduce the length of their docks to 200 feet from 600 feet. Hurr advised that she would be serving on an ethics committee in conjunction with the LMCD. She stated that concerns have been raised about potential conflicts of interest involving various persons and issues before the LMCD. Hurr stated that the Mayor of Orono, and Gen Olson will serve on the committee in addition to other persons outside of the LMCD. The ethics committee will study the various licenses and fees imposed by the LMCD. Hurr said, "I strongly believe that the fees and services of the LMCD should be paid by the users of the lake, and those requesting special events. The lakeshore communities should not have to subsidize the various property owners, businesses, etc. I have taken a position for years that if fees total more than what was initially paid, then the difference should be billed back to the party incurring the services. There is no reason why the cities should pick up the extra attorney fees for an application that requires additional work Cl supervision." Hurr informed Council that the annual LMCD lake outing is scheduled for August 3, 1991. Jabbour stated that he is disappointed with the LMCD's $100.00 late fee that is charged to marina operators who do not apply for their license in a timely manner. He said, "It is financially advantageous for a marina operator to wait to apply for a license. They receive more interest on their money that would otherwise be used for licensing fees. The City of Orono requires persons who need after-the-fact permits to pay a double fee. It may also be appropriate for the LMCD to establish inspection fees. That way, persons who comply immediately and require only one or two inspections are not paying fot those that must have several inspections." Hurr agreed with Jabbour, adding that with the budget restraints that all of the cities are under, it is increasingly important for the LMCD to do whatever possible to lessen the amount each city must pay to the LMCD. Jabbour commended the LMCD Board of Directors for their conservation attitude reflected in the revised Management Plan. Hurr indicated that she had nothing further to report. Mayor Peterson and Council thanked Hurr for her report. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None. - 5 - ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 22, 1991 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT: (#5)ZONING FILE 11604-CLAIR ROOD 2215 KENWOOD WAY VARIANCB/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-RESOLUTION 12989 Clair Rood was present, Bernhardson provided a brief stateT.ent explaining the basis for Mr. Rood's application, noting that the Planning Commission had recommended approval. He informed Council that Planning Commission also recommended that Mr. Rood reduce the height of the existing pillars on his property to 3*> feet, or that he apply for a separate height Vari-iice. Bernhardson added that another issue for Council's consideration involves the legal combination of the parcels owned by Mr. Rood. Gaffron explained that the pillars, retaining walls and constitute an accessory use and are located on lots that have no principal structure. Goetten indicated that, in her opinion, the Ordinance requiring a principal structure with an accessory structure pertains more to structures such as docks, barns, garages, etc. She did not see the need to require a lot combination in Mr Rood's case. Jabbour agreed with Goetten that a lot combination is not necessarv. Mr. Rood stated that at some point in the future, he would like to build a house on lots 54 and 55, but that he is not yet prepared to submit a subdivision application. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2989, approving a Variance and Conditional Use Permit for excavation within a wetland area, as amended to omit Condition ill pertaining to legal combination of the four parcels owned by the applicant. \'oted aye. Motion passed. (#6)ZONING FILE f1646-TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH 2060 SIXTH AVENDE NORTH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-RESOLUTION #2990 Jerry Jones, an authorized representative Lutheran Church was present. for Trinity Bernhardson advised that the applicant is seeking a Conditional Use Permit for a church use in conjunction with the construction of a detached garage. He informed Council that the Planning Commission had recommended approval. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution #2990, granting a Conditional Use Permit for the - 6 - ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 22, 1991 Tv (#6)ZONING FILE #1646-TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH CONTINUED construction of a detached garage at Trinity Lutheran Church, 2060 Sixth Avenue North. All voted aye. Motion passed. (#7)ZONING FILE #1656-DONALD L. MEYER 485 PARK AVENUE VARIANCES-RESOLUTION #2991 Donald Meyer was present. Bernhardson explained that Mr. Meyer's application pertains to a request for a side setback Variance, as well as a Variance which would allow a nine foot separation between a principal Structure and detached accessory structure. Bernhardson noted that the Planning Commission recommended approva’ of this application. It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2991, approving a three foot .^ide setback Variance, and a one foot Variance to the requirement that there be ten feat between a principal structure and a detached accessory structure. BILL" STUBBS(#8*)ZONING FILE 11658-LYNDON S. 255 FOX STREET RENEWAL VARIANCE-RESOLUTION #2992 It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2992, granting a renewal of a lot area Variance, in accordance with the guidelines set forth in Resolution #2841. All voted aye. Motion passed. (#9)ZONING FILE 11666-MICHAEL HILBELINK 2180 PROSPECT AVENUE RENEWAL VARIANCE This item was removed from the Consent Agenda at the request of Staff (Jeanne Mabusth), on behalf of a neighboring property owner, Dianne Jentilucci. Bernhardson stated that the applicant applied for a renewal of a lot area and side street setback Variance. The applicant has submitted an amended proposal, which reduces the side street setback Variance to nine feet, rather than 20 feet proposed with the original application. Bernhardson advised that the Planning Commission had unanimcusiy recommended approval of this application. Jabbour asked whether it would be appropriate to have the applicant present for the oic''u'=‘»ion of this application. Mabusth stated that the applicant should be given the opportunity to appear before Council if it is Council's intention to deny the application. - 7 - ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 22, 1991 L (#9)ZONING FILE #1666-HILBELIHK CONTINUED Dianne Jentilucci, 1295 Briar Street, stated that language had been included in Resolution #2839. that was not included in the proposed resolution. She asked that the last portion o Condition #6, starting with the sentence "Applicant shall maintain erosion control on his property throughout construction to prevent any restriction of drainage system..."/ be included in the proposed resolution. Jabbour asked if that language could be added to t*-e proposed resolution v/ithouc the applicant's knowledge. Bernhardson advised that such an amendment could be made to the resolution without prior knowledge on behalf of the applicant. The applicant will subsequently be notified of the revision, and should he object, the matter would come back to Council for further review. Ms. Jentilucci asked for clarification regarding the width of drainage easements that were granted by Mr. Hilbelink along the north side of his property. Mabusth stated that the City Engineer only asked for ten feet. Mayor Peterson noted that Resolution i*2c39 indicates that drainage easement 15 feet wide was granted on the north property line. Ms. Jentilucci said. "We granted a 10 foot easement on our property, and it was my understanding that Mr. Hilbelink v/as to also grant a 10 foot easement. Resolution #283* indicates tnat he was to give a 15 foot easement. I would jv.st like to know which is correct." Mabusth advised that Staff would confirm the width of the easement granted by Mr. Hilbelink aiong the northern property line. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to table application #1666, pending Staff's confirmation of the easements granted by the applicant, and the additional language being adde^ to the proposed resolution, as requested by Dianne Jentilucci. All voted aye. Motion passed. (•10)XOMING FILE #16€7-WHITNBY MACMILLAN 1700 FOX STREET VARIAMCE-RBSOLUTION #2993 Mrs. MacMillan was present. Bernhardson provided a brief summary of the information sec forth in Jeanne i-iabusth's memo dated July 10, 1991. He advised - 8 - ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 22, 1991 (flO)ZONING FILE #1667-MACMILLAN CONTINUED that the Planning Commission had recommended approval of the MacMillan's application for a Variance to the City's Clean Fill Ordinance. Jabbour asked the City Attorney whether the City would be liable# if in the future, it is discovered that hazardous materials were buried in conjunction with this application. Barrett replied, "My understanding is that both the Federal and State hazardous waste laws would not hold the City liable for hazardous materials." Goetten o ked for assurance that any future owners/developers of this property will be notified of the fact that the building materials are buried on the site. Kabusth advised that covenants will be filed v/ith the chain of title for this property which will serve as a method of notification. It was moved by Jabbour. seconded by Coetten, to adopt Resolution #2993, granting a Variance to the City's Zoning Code Section 10.03, which allows manmade materials to be buried at 1700 Fox Street. All voted aye. Motion passed. ENGINEER'S REPORT: 'V- I.; t (|11*)REQUEST FOR PAYMENT #8-PUMPHOUSE #2 It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to authorize the payment of $11,437.53 to Richmar Construction for work done for the Pumphouse #3 project, as set forth in Request for Payment #8. All voted aye. Motion passed. (#12)HCCULLEY ROAD MSA PROJECT-ADVERTISE FOR BIDS Bernhardson referred Council to John Gerhardson's memo dated July 16, 1991, which outlines the reason and estimated cost for the installation of storm sewer on McCulley Road. •Tt was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Jabbour, to direct the City Engineer to advertise for bids for the storm sewer project #152-104-03 on tlcCulley Road. All voted aye. Motion passed. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT: OTHER Mayor Peterson reminded those in attenaance of the farewell dinner being held in honor of Mark Bernhardson. She advised that she would be unable to attend the meeting, and wanted to take this opportunity to thank Mark for all his help. Mayor Peterson wished him well in his new position as City Administrator for the - 9 - t.> ‘ h ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 22, 1991 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT-OTHER CONTINUED City of Bloomington. Council briefly discussed the contents of a letc^: that had been received from the City of Long Lake. Jabbour expressed his dis.jppointment regarding the ongoing stress in the relationship between the cities of Orono and Lone: Lake. Council agreed with Jabbour, stating that it is difficult to respond to the many issues raised in recent letters received from the City of Long Lake. (#13)ROLE OF ACTING ADMINISTRATOR Jabbour stated that he wished to have Mary Butler'e participation on this item, and suggested tabling it until Council's meeting scheduled for Tuesday, July 23, 19S1. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to table this matter until the Council meeting scheduled for July 23, 1991. All voted aye. Motion passed. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: <il4)CITY FACILITIES Bernhardson reported that the earnest money check for the land is in the process of being prepared and mailed. He presented Council with the draft brochure that will be sent to the residents of Orono to inform them about the progression of the City facilities project. Mayor Peterson asked Bernhardson, v/ho, in addition to Jack Boarman, is working on the infonr.'tion brochure. Bernhardson stated that Michael Gaffron will be working on the brochure. Goetten indicated that she would like to have Counciimember Butler's input on the brochure preparation. Jabbour st«>ted that he wants the brochure to provide as much detail about the various financial aspects of the facility as possible. He said, "I want people to know exactly how much money we intend to spend on the building, as well as v/hat will be spent on furniture, landscaping, etc.” Council agreed to postpone the scheduling of the public information meeting and Public Hearing until their August 12th meeting. John Farnham, 3225 Carman Road, commended Council for their - 10 - ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 22, 1991 (#14)CITY FACILITIES CONTINUED efforts in trying to minimize the costs for the nev/ City facilities. He stated that he, and persons he has been authorized to represent, have that same goal in mind, Farnham asked for Council’s permission to make a brief presentation that will confirm the reed for Council to continue their cost containment efforts. He stated that after he has shov/n the Council statistical information, he would like to make a recotnniendation for reducing the cost of the facility. Farnham displayed statistical information comparing the City of Orono to the City of Plymouth and the City of Coon Rapids. The information compared population, staff size (excluding public works personnel), and the square footage of the existing facilities, for Plymouth and Coon Rapids, with population, staff size and the proposed facilities for Orono. In summarizing the statistics, Farnham said, "Orono has approximately l/7th the population of the other two Cities, and l/4th the city staff. The facility for the City of Coon Rapids is approxima tely 23,000 square feet, Plymouth has about 22,000. This includes police and administration. The City of Orono is proposing approximately 17,000 square feet. The public works facility for Coon Rapids is approximately 29,000 square feet, Plymouth has about 23,000 square feet, Orono will have 29,000 square feet. The Cities of Plymouth and Coon Rapids have approximately 200 miles of streets, and very extensive municipal water and sev/er services. Coon Rapids employs 61 persons in their Public V/orks Department, Plymouth has 50, and the City of Orono has 11." Jabbour wanted to assure Mr. Farnham that he has been attentive to the concerns he has raised, and had read the letter Mr. Farnham had published in the various local newspapers. He said. "After reading Mr. Farnham's letter, I visited Coon Rapids and Plymouth, and talked with their officials, in an attempt to learn how they are managing, given their staff numbers in relation to the size of their facilities. As we are sitting here this very moment, the City of Plymouth is holding a Public Hearing to expand their inadequ .te facility." Farnham stated that he is aware of that. Jabbour stated that he talked with the Finance Director for the City of Coon Rapids, and he indicated that because their facility has inadequate space, they are new utilizing space within the existing council chambers and council meetings will be held in another building. He said, "The City of Coon Rapids tried to build a new police department, new council chambers, and a new fire department. They put the issue to a referendum and it failed. I find it hard to believe that Mr. Farnham is comparing us with two cities that are trying their hardest to get out of the inadequate situation in which they now find themselves." - 11 - h ■ 1,^ ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 22. 1991 (#14)CITY FACILITIES CONTINUED Goetteh stated that she had spoken with a Plymouth Councilmember, who indicated that they need an additional 13,000 square feet for their facility. She said, "The CJty of Plymouth v/ould like to build an entirely nev/ public works facility. The existing Plymouth facilities were constructed only 12 years ago. I cannot believe that Mr. Farnham is asking us to short change ourselves ir the way Plymouth has done. L’e (Council) have been very conservative in our approach to a new facility, v/hile taking into consideration our future needs. The statistics given to us by Mr. Farnham appear to have no relevance at all." I-'. -I f V T Jabbour invited Mr. Farnham to show Council specific areas and square footage that could be eliminated from the proposed facility. Farnham stated that Council was missing the point. He said, "Up until now, Plymouth and Coon Rapids have managed with their existing facilities, and they have approxi.mately seven times the population of the City of Orono." Mayor Peterson acknov/ledged that such may be the case, but asked Farnham if he had applied his ratios to the square footage of the city facilities Plymouth and Coon Rapids must add on to their existing facilities in order for them to be functional. Farnham indicated that he had not done so. He added that Plymouth and Coon Rapids had much more complex governmental systems, such as parks, water, sewer, commercial/industcial parks, multi-family housing, etc. Bernhardson advised Mr. Farnham that it may seem as though the cities of Plymouth and Coon Rapids are more complex, but that may not actually be the case. He stated that the City of Orono has one of the most complex zoning codes compared to many other suburban communities. He said, "With regard to service to commercial and industrial properties- actually those are very much tax generators The cost of service to sucn entities is very minimal. There are many aspects to a facility, such as the holding cell for tlie police department, that is constructed to a certain size regardless of the size of city. As far as community size, the economy of scale dictates the need for a certain amount of square footage for a facility within a community having 10,000 to 15,000 persons. The needed square footage does not increase again until the population reaches 100,000. It would be more appropriate to compare the facility needs for the City of Orono with the needs for cities such as Champlin and Mendota Heights." Callahan asked Mr. Farnham which parts of the proposed city facilities for Orono he would limit. Mayor Peterson advised Farnham that the Council has spent s- - 12 - b i: ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 22, 1991 (#14)CITY FACILITIES CONTINUED {113 y, [nsny hours on this issue, and has cutback as iTiuch as possible. She asked fir. Farnhan if his concerns were nainly of a financial aspect. Fanham indicated that he was not concerned about dollars, but was concerned about size, and would rather see dollars spent on something other than excess space. He suggested to Counci] that they could have a v/orkable, adequate size facility s’mply by- cutting the square footage of the administrative and police departments by 30% to *10%, and the public worxs department by -i0% to 50%. Calxdhan asked Farnham to be specific. Farnhara suggested reducing everything do\/n to the size legally required. Jabbour commented that if that were done, the result would be the City’s existing facility. Farnham said, "We all want a new facility, we just want a different size." Goetten asked Farnham if he had toured the existing City facilities and seen how woefully inadequate they are. She advised Farnham that it v/ould be mucn more beneficial if he could present relevant statistics and constructive ideas. Farnham stated that he had thought Council had appreciated and accepted his past efforts on this matter, but that for some time. Council has rejected his ideas. Jabbour stated that he has made every effort to make himself available to discuss this matter with Mr. Farnham, and that Council has tried to be receptive to his concerns. Callahan added that Councilmembers took time to look into the situations with the cities of Plymouth and Coon Rapids, which is an indication that Council paid much attention to points raised by Mr. Farnham, Farnham apologized for taking Council's time. Council took no formal action on this matter. (§15)LAKE USE COMMITTEE It v/as agreed that the Lake Use Committee would attempt to meet on July 29, 1991, at 7:00 p.m. Gaffron indicated that he would inform John Shardlow of the meeting date and time. Council accepted the information provided in Mark - 13 - ».■ 'v l>>!) b ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 22. 1991 (#15)LAKE USE COMMITTEE CONTINUED Bernhardson's July 12, 19.1 meno, this matter. and took no formal action on (#16)EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS SIREN-MINNETONKA BEACH/ORONO Bernhardson informed Council that the City of .Minnetonka Beach decided, in 1988, to purchase and install an emergency preparedness siren, at the recommendation of Orono Police Chief Mel Kilbo. This siren would provide coverage to portions of Orono, such as Crystal Bay. and Big Island The Citv of Orono agreed to contribute $3,500 to the City of Minnetonka Beach for use toward the purchase of the siren. Recently, the Minnetonka Beach Council agreed that they would prefer to have an electronic siren, which would function even in the case of a power outage. The City of Minnetonka Beach is asking th^^ City of Orono to contribute an additional $1,800 toward the purchase of the 125 decibel electronic siren, which is more costly than the siren they had first intended to purchase. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, that Council authorize that an additional sum of $1,800 be paid to the City of Minnetonka for the installation of a 125 decibel electronic mechanical siren in the Hill Road area ot Minnetonka Beach to provide long-term coverage for Big Island and the abutting waters in the area, together with interim coverage in the Crystal Bay/North Shore area. All voted aye. Motion passed. (il7)BIGH?IAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY Bernhardson presented Council with a professional services proposal from the Consulting Engineering firm of Strgar-Roscoe-Fausch, Inc., in relation to providing transportation engineering services to the City of Orono for the Highway 12 Corridor study. He advised that the cost estimate for the services outlined in the proposal would be $7,200. Goetten stated that Strgar-Roscoe-Fausch has an excellent reputation, and that she would highly recommend hiring the firm. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Callahan, to authorize Staff to engage the services of SRF for general transportation purposes, planning purposes, together v/ith utilization of other systems in the Highway 12 process in accordance with the schedule set forth in Attachment B, and that those monies come from the City's Fund Balance after the special projects emount has been extended. All voted aye. Motion passed. (#18)CITY RECORDER REPLACET4ENT Bernhardson advised that Deputy Clerk, Teri Maab, had submitted her resignation from that position, contingent on the City entering into a contractual agreement with her as its City Recorder. He further explained that Lin Vee has expressed interest in pursuing the Deputy Clerk's position, and that he - 14 - ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 22, 1991 (#18)CITY RECORDER REPLACEMENT would recommend that. Goetten stated that she will miss having Ten as a full-time employee. She questioned whether Council could appoint her to the Recording position without the need to advertise for additional proposals. Bernhardson stated that in the case of a contractual arrangement it would not be necessary to seek additional proposals. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to accept Teri Naab's resignation as Deputy Clerk, and approve her employment with the City as its Recorder. Council accepts her resignation with regret, but looks forward to working with Ten in h<»r r#»rordina Dosition. In addition, I.in Vee is appointed _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ^ v-w * w . . - - - - - - - in her recording position. In addition, I.in Vee is appointed Deputy Clerk, and Council authorizes the search for a replacement clerical person. All voted aye. Motion passed. (#19)CLOSE OUT 1966-76 G.O. IMPROVEMENT BONDS DEBT SERVICE FUND RESOLUTION #2994 It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2994, closing the 1966-1976 G.O. Improvement Bonds Debt Service Fund to the Building Capital Outlay Fund for building construction and improvements. All voted aye. Motion passed. (#20)SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT 1991 C.D.B.G. YEAR XVII RESOLUTION #2995 It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve Resolution #2995, approving the agreement with Hennepin County for the use of year XVII Community Development Block Grant Funds. All voted aye. Motion passed. (#21*)RESIGNATION OF JAMES GILBERT-PARK COMMISSION It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to accept the resignation of Jim Gilbert as Park Commission Member and to draft a letter of appreciation to be signed by the Mayor and Council. Staff is authorized to advertise for and accept applications to fill the vacancy. All voted aye. Motion passed. (#22*)POLICE CHIEF SELECTION-7/23/91 INTERVIEWS It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to accept the information presented in Mark Bernhardson's m^mo dated July 12, 1991, regarding the interview meeting scheduled for July 23, 1991, at 3:00 p.m. All voted aye. Motion passed. - 15 - ry t. I ft' If ■ s. i I i. k. & ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 22. 1991 (#23*)AUTHORITY TO HIRE PART-TIME POLICE CLERK It was moved by Goetten. seconded by y.ayor Peterson, to approve the employment of Janice Keonen as a p^'’rt-time police clerk effective July 23, 1991, at a rate of S6.839 per hour. All voted aye. Motion passed. (#24*)SEVERANCE PAY-CITY ADMINISTRATOR It irfas moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve a 4% salary increase from $57,755 to $60,065, for City Administrator, Mark Dernhardson, effective May 1, 1991, and to approve payment of two weeks severance pay and all unused vacation in the total amount of $3,656.36, and that such payment be adjusted as required after audit of the final balances and implementation of the new salary rate. Ail voted aye. Motion passed. (#25*)1991 AUDIT It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to appoint the audit firm of Malloy Karno\/ski & Co. to perform the required audits for the 1991 fiscal year at an estimated cost of $14,800, plus direct expenses. All voted aye. Motion pasjsed. (#26*)HUNICIPAL BOARD PROCESS It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to accept the information provi.ved by Mark Dernhardson in his July 17, 1991 memo. All voted aye. Motion passed. (#27*)PERSONNEL POLICY/OROINANCE AMENDMENT-PERSONAL HOLIDAY RESOLUTION #2996 It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2996, adopting amendments to the Administrative and Personnel Policy Section 307. All voted aye. Motion passed. (28*)ADNlNISTRATOR'S INFORMATION It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to accept the City Administrator's Information regarding; Spates Avenue, and Proposed Household Hazardous Waste Collection Site. All voted aye. Motion passed. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: None. (#29*)LICENSES It was moved by Goetten, seconded approve the following license(s): by Mayor Peterson, to Septic System Installer: Marty Excavating All voted aye. fJotion passed. - 16 - I ■ i- ' ■ 5" I?- ?! ii* f. &■• !is rv- ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 22. 1991 (#30*)fiILLS It was moved by Goetten, seconded approve payment of the All Funds Account, passed. by Mayor Peterson, to All voted aye. Motion ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Jabbour< to adjourn the Regular Council Meeting until Tuesday, July 23, 1991, at 8:00 p.ra. All voted aye. Motion passed. Barbara A. Peterson. Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk - 17 - f- 0- %AMINUTES OF THE CITY OF ORONO HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORIl or ORONO, MINNESOTA HELD JULY 22, 1991 ROLL CALL: The Housing and Redevelopment Authority met on the abcW^i^ date with the following members present: Barbara Peterson J. Diann Goetten, Edward Callahan, and Gabriel Jabbour. Mary Butler ^ v/as absent. Also present were City Attorney Thomas Barrett, Charles Kelley, and City Recorder Laurie Scheffler. The meeting was called to order at 8;46 p.m. ELECTION OF OFFICERS It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Peterson, to nominate the following persons to serve as officers of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority: Gabriel Jabbour as Chair, Mary Butler a., Vice-Chair, and Charles Kelley as Secretary. Ail voted aye. Motion passed. ADOPTION OF BY-LAViS It was agreed by the Authority that the City Attorney be directed to properly complete the By-Laws. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Goetten. the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Orono Meeting at 8:50 p.m. All voted aye. Motion passed. to adjourn Minnesota Gabriel Jabbour, Cha,_r Attest: Charles Kelley, Secretary - J - SPECIAL MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL 3:00 P.M., JULY 23, 1991 ^ <P n^ . '%/>Member? present; Mayor Peterson, Counci Imembers J. Diann GoetterriC/ Ed Callahan, Gabriel Jabbour and Mary Butler. Representing city staff were Mc'k Bernhardson, City ;'iministrator and John Gerhardson, Pub c Works Director. POLICE CHIEF INTERVIEWS - The Council interviewed the five finalists for the Polcie Chief's position. After review of the five finalists Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded to offer the position to Steve Sullivan and diected the City Administrator and the consultant Jim Brimeyer of Sathe and Associates to prepare an employment and compensation package within the appropriate guidelines and to present that agreement to the Council on Lugust 12, 1991. All voted aye. Motion passed . DISCIPLINARY ACTION - Callahan moved, Butler seconded to approve the recommendation of the Public Works Director to suspend without pay for one week, Erik Bowman for operating equipment in an unsafe manner. All voted aye. Motion passed. ACTIliG CITY ADMINISTRATOR SPECIFICATIONS - Callahan moved, Butler seconded to approve the job description for the Acting City Administrator position. All voted aye. Motion passed. F.ESOLOTION AMEND CITY ’S COMPENSATION PLAN - Butler moved, Callahan seconded to adopt Resolution #2999 amending the City's compensation plan to allow for an adjustment to the Acting City Administrator's salary from 5% to 15% rate which amounts to $4#533 annually and that this increase is in effect until the new City Administrator recommends an adjustment. All voted aye. Motion passed. RRSOLOTION OP APPRECIATION - MARK BERNHARDSON - Jabbour moved, Callahan seconded to adopt Resolution #2997 a Resolution of Appreciation to Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator. All voted aye. Motion passed. Motion by Peterson, seconded by Butler to adjourn at 8:45 p.m. All voted aye. Motion passed. r Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M.Hallin, City Clerk r ■Of Ctfy SPECIAL MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL 3:30 P.M., JULY 30, 1991 199x: Members present; Mayor Barbara Peterson, CounciImeoibers J. Dianne Goetten, Ed Callahan, Gabriel Jabbour and Mary Butler. Acting Administrator John R. Gerhardson and Jack Boatman were also in attendance. Following a review of the Request for Proposals from four companies offering construction manager services, Callahan moved, Peterson seconded to direct staff to negotiate an agreement/contract with Kraus/Anderson to provide a construction manager for the new city facility and that the fixed amount of the contract not exceed $90,000 and that the reimbursibles amount not exceed $106,950. All voted aye. Motion passed. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Peterson, to adjourn the special meeting at 5:00 p.m. All voted aye. Motion passed. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk TOS Proas Dates Subject: Mayor Peterson & Orono Council Members John R. Gerhardson, Acting City Administrator August 7, 1991 87 9^^2 Planning Assistance - Orono Treatment Plant Property Ko Recently the Park Commission was directed to review City properties that may possibly be sold as a result of the City facility being relocated to Old Crystal Bay Road, north of Highway 12, One of the properties under review is the old Orono sewage treatment plant on Old Crystal Bay Road adjacent to French Lake, The Park Commission feels that all or parts of the parcel should be kept for wildlife preservat-.on or a very passive- recreational use. In order to determine a reasonable amount to retain, the Park Commission feels that they need the assistance of a professional planner. On August 6, 1991, John Shardlow from Dahlgren Shardlow & Uban, who has assisted the City on several occasions^ appeared before th Park Commission and advised the Park Comnlsslor, on how he could assist them and the cost for that service (see attached letter). Mr. Alex Vongries, Vice Chair of the Park Commission, will be in attendance on August 12th to discuss this matter. JRG/tln PMHt* brand fax transmittal memo /67i p t •» t - - •• ♦ •<’ ’• f.. L?- •• w \ • L' h [I.CKIN ^1 )I.( '\V ' ■ I ;B/\n •!<OD«»OKA- consllt :nc planners LANDSCAPE ARCtUJZCTS . 300 FIRST A\‘tNL:£ NORTK SUITE IX y»rN*NE.^^^oi:s v :n *35:01 . _ <^12* ? 5 ^00 7Aagiisl;l99i Qediardson, Acting Administrator CilyofOrono F.OB0K66 Crystal Bi^,' MK:55j23 . . .1 RE; of Cost of Services to Assist the Parfo Commission in the Evaluation of the Fade Development Potential of the. Former Sewagb Treatment Property Dear John: ni^ at the Parks Commission meeting we disenssed the need for the Commissioa to review amore complete ena^isis of this property’s development potential in order to make a reasoned rwimmeijdadoni’tO'theCiiy GounciL l.describ^ an approadi that would involve havm^ one of our 3^ouiiger landscape aichitects-pr^are a base map, complete an analysis of the and prepare a sumpsaiy of analym sadiibit, and then from this infoimation, prepare fonie yhjwnstie fk#»rrfi es that would explore some development alternatives. 9• •. £propCKi^ last nljftlt that we would b(^(m flhistxatmg the optimum scheme for developing die entitepatkaa a passive, natural amenity, and then^illastriite how some of the area mig^t betfcwdoped for single-family residential lots and how this might alter the park plans. » ■ • ' ..." I hsvesptdcea to Mike Gaffron *mee last nig^t, and I now understand th^ h will take. tbcNit a day to Ibcateaiid'assemble all of the perdneht base information prepare a study baah m^. I was assuming that diere already was a base map that cotild he used. This adds $200iX) to my rou^ estimate that I made 1^ ni^t.’ We will prepare, a s6i^ map, assemble and anaj^e'the deydopment potential of the pmp<»jly^aiMi.jprepara • imitnary hf analyaia athibiL We alM prepare a plan that <■*>•»«■ the entirepippetty for park purposes apd atlr ^two adtStjor. al-altcmatives that sfoold abo O0e or more lots On the proper^. Tliis work will be done ^ one of ouryoungmlandKa^ architects, workingnader the supervisiott of our seoibr park planners. We wOLdevdop padeets ^Farks Cbmmbsion, Sta£^ and City Council review. Dtese win be a standard page (to.be detecnine^, which could range* from /2” x .l 1" toll*xl7* depeudlugonthe base map. These edmtts will be pr^iar^ in fulLcolor.. We will complete diis woHc for S950.00. * • • •• Sincere^. • • «e» DAHlJORE^i* SHARDLOW, AND UB a N, INC. JflffirW.5hardIow,..^Q? ^^Presideot August 8, 1991 Mayor Barbara A. Peterson Orono City Councilmembers P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bayr MN 55323 Ret Park Commission Matters Dear Mayor Peterson 6 Councilmembers: . ‘'Z k--* I hau hoped to be at the Council meeting scheduled for next Monday* Augustl2th* but a recently scheduled business trip prevents my being there. Alex Vongries has agreed to be present on the 12th* but I wanted to give you a written update on several other matters as well. 1. Bike Trail. I am pleased to report that at the Park Commission's request* Hennepin County has agreed to cooperate with the City and to pay a major portion of the cost of a bike/hike trail to extend from Baker Park along the east side of Old Crystal Bay Road to the Luce Line. The County has indicated that it will allocate $132,000 to this project in addition to the improvements to be constructed within Baker Park itself. Representatives of Hennepin County Parks and I will appear at your meeting on August 26th to brief you on this project and to request conceptual approval. It is important that the trail be provided for in planning and funding for the new City facilities since the trail can provi'-i an excellent link from the facilities to the rest of the community. 2. Park Planning for the Old Sewer Pond Property. We have now considered the appropriate use of the old sewer pond property at three meetings cf the Parks Commission. It is the view of the majority of the Commission that the sewer pond and a portion of the adjacent area should be set aside as a pond* wetland and natural area. A portion of the land owned by the City can be developed if proper planning is provided to protect this extraordinary natural resource. Accordingly* we ask that you take the following two actions: I'V u Park Commission Matters August 1, 1991 Page 2 of 2 A, That you instruct the City staff to apply for a permit from the DNR to restore the sewer pond to an appropriate water level. This was approved unanimously at our meeting on July 2. B. That you authorize us to retain a consultant at a cost of approximately $950. It appears to us that if we are to accommodate a suitable park and natural area on the property, as well as compatible development of a portion of the property, a consultant should be retained to assist you and us in our planning. We reviewed several conceptual plans at our meeting on August 6 but were unable to agree upon the most desireable plan without professional assistance. Mr. John Shardlow of Dahlgren, Shardlow and Uban was at our meeting and advised us that the planning assistance which we envision can be accomplished for approximately $950 and can be available for the next Park Commission meeting on September 3. 3. Other Available City Property. We reviewed the McCulley Road parcel at our June 3 meeting and concluded that we should retain a bike trail corridor of approximately 30 feet width along the west side of McCulley Road and we should also retain a parking area to serve the Luce Line. Aside from this, we concluded that there is no need to retain this property for park purposes. We are continuing to evaluate the Crystal Bay property where the present municipal facilities are located. We have evaluated several alternatives, but have not yet reached a definitive conclusion. I am sorry that I will be unable to attend next Monday's meeting, but I look forward to seeing you and answering any questions you might have on the 26th. Sincerely yours. 1 i<y //■I Richard N. Flint RNP/ers % .C t5. r To:Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council City Administrator Bernhardson % Vxami Date: Subject: Jeanne A, Mabusth# Building & Zoning Administ?^i;J:o^ July 3, 1991 O. <rV>'^Sq. ^ #1659 Big Island Inc., Record Lots 12 & 19, Big Island Vacation - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.12 - Applicant proposes vacation of unimproved dedicated right-of-way as shown on Exhibit B. List of Bnhibita - A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Wetland Map E - Letter to DNR F - Section of Orono Parks & Proposed Trail System Based on earlier review comments of staff, applicants were advised that the area of the unimproved alley could not be included within the dry buildable area needed to satisfy the 5 acre standard for a day-use conditional use permit. Required « 5 acres Existing > 4.74 acres Area of Unimproved Right-of-way Total Area “ 5.02 acres .28 acres Staff has re 'wed the location of the dedicated right-of- way in relation to the current ownership pattern, usage, topography and adjacen* vr'viands and finds no public use for the subject area. If ther is a zoning density change at some time in the future and new lot lines are defined, the City will acquire drainage and utility easements that time. The Park Commission was asked to review the vacation request at their '4^^ 2nd meeting. Staff has been advised that the Park Commission di not address the vacation of the 20* alley and potential use of the area for a bike trail. This application will be rescheduled at the Park Commission meeting of August €th. The DNR has been asked to respond to the proposed vacation of the 20* wide alley as it provides a public access to the lakeshore. Vacation of all right-of-ways that provide public access to the lake must be reviewed by the DNR. If staff receives no written comments from Ceil Strauss by your meeting date, staff will contact her office for conceptual direction. \ ’•'Q ) i-j'iyfi. I-!-My , - ^4' %■. X Zoning File 11659 July 3, 1991 Page 2 of 2 In regard to the Park Commission's review of the vacation petition, staff would ask that you review Exhibit F - a section of the comprehensive park/bike trail system as developed by the Park COTunission and approved by the Council. There are no trail systems shown on Big Island, only the Veterans Camp. The Hennepin County Preserve Park is not designated. It would appear that the Park Commission had not considered bike trails on Big Island. Staff will contact the Chairman to see if this is even a valid consideration for the Park Commission's review. Pending final determinations from the DNR, staff would recommend the complete vacation of the 20' alley as platted in the rearrangement of Lot 1, Kitchel's Subdivision of Govt Lots 5 and 6 finding no public use for the unimproved right-of-way. ti. -r I/>■ Zoning File #1659 August 6/ 1991 Page 3 Additional Consents and Planning Connission Reconmendations Staff advised the Planning Commission that the DNR representative (John Stein) was contacted for comments concerning the proposed vacation. Mr. Stein concurred that in light of the current pattern of ownership and 5 acre minimum lot size for Big Island properties that the existing access serves no public purpose. The DRN would support the proposed vacation of the 20* wide alley. As for the bike trail issue, as with the Jeff Johnson's application, we have enclosed copies of the bike trail system approved by the Park Commission and adopted by the Council. There are no bike trail systems proposed within Big Island. The Planning Commission ’■ecommended unanimous approval of the proposed vacation. The ei closed resolution has been drafted for Council's review and action. Isv Pa- .H.- I'Y- i'-’ t:-‘;•' r.'- Y' h li t **t* /'o o A.-, -*5-» UA\ A ?*«esho^ CITYof ORONO \\>RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _____ ______ A RESOLUTION VACATING AN UNDEVELOPED ALLEY WITHIN THE PLAT OF REARRANGEMENT OP LOT 1, KITCHEL'S SUBDIVISION OP GOVERNMENT LOTS 5 AND 6 (SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 117, RANGE 23) HENNEPIN COUNTY, CITY OP ORONO, MINNESOTA FILE NO. 1659 NHEREAS, the City of Orono is vi municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and MBBRBAS, on June 20, 1991, Thomas A. Judd, an authorized representative of Big Island, Inc., filed a petition with the City of Orono requesting the vacation of an unimproved alley at a 20* width, legally described as follows: A 20* platted alley dedicated within the plat of the rearrangement of Lot 1, Kitchel*s Subdivision of Government Lots 5 and 6 (Section 22, Township 117, Range 23), Hennepin County, Minnesota; and NHEREAS, after due published and posted notice, a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission on July 15, 1991 regarding said vacation and all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard; and NHEREAS, after due standing and consideration, the Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the requested vacation and the Council of the City Orono finds that said vacation, as proposed, is in Iceeping with the public interest in consideration of the following findings: 1.Existing 20* width of right-of-way would not meet current standards for development of a public road. 2.Based on the pattern of development in current ownership, there is no use of right-of-way for access purposes. Page 1 of 2 J k? r f !■ >i- 5^ Iv ¥‘ %i // / ‘ o o// Av *. , ''4 %'**esBor ArN CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. NOW, TBBRBPORB BB IT RBSOLVBD, that the petition of Thomas A. Judd, an authorized representative of Big Island, Inc., is hereby granted by the Council of the City of Orono and that the unimproved right-of-way legally described above is hereby vacated. The granting of the petition is subject to the condition that upon vacation the applicant shall execute a special lot combination with the City to ensure the two properties are legally defined as one since current vehicle used to convey ownership of parcels prevent legal combination by Hennepin County. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held August 12, 1991. ATTESTt Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA } ) 88. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day August, 1991, by Barbara A, Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor t City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 2 of 2 k CITY OP ORONO - GENERAL LAND OSB APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site address Big Island Record Lots and 19 if --a & -1*^ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 22-117-23-42-0020 22-117-23-42-0019 Please attach legal description to appl "ration if not included on required survey.rrrv r,r r-v/'i/n .....................i5L'i —c i f ♦ L.»ML'r»vJ f aftrTMuu u*i f a i--t- 3.. APPLICANT Name Thomas A. Judi. Esq. Phone (home) 474-2049w“59JC ’0«>(? ^'x tn.4f •,9£fA TLPhone (work) 473-4402 '••c.-i A' “ /Mr5'Vi\ Address Hassel & Enlow^ 10i)~ E. Wavzata Blvd, City Wavzata r ^ r • ONNER (if different than applicant) Name Big Island. Inc._________ Phone (home) Phone ;V I'Address P.O. Box 188 !r>w.. %’rf' _____________________ City Excelsior _____ Zic 0020 - 6/29/84 Date Property Acquired 0019 - 9/12/86 ____________ I lOBOO (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land (month/year) - CONDITIORAL OSB PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercia. 'Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of la)ceshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule kOB »; f-'-i APPLICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 $175.00 $ 50.00 ' $250.00 $100.00 1 Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Appeals other •“ see fee schedule / 1. O'Ofe . ‘-5i .•■ -fUrr. — . -#wf * ■•' ! r. :r--. -v, • ” • , -> ^. I » “. t. •.. .. »^fv V —. « vi. •,-rr . -i: \ f*'v-.it* ^ -*i-< O' *^rr*:f j*.-^ «-»*-•'mm liNifi^ |tiUN OATE 06/E|/10 ' BATCH OM \ > I-.;r ! •'.diJO ADOR -OMCB NMC- 4 TAXPAYER -!;>i-NAHE/AOOR .. .. i ••' • ) / •. ; '* M .tt*117-tS At 0001 OOOSO AOORESS UNASSIGNEO JANES A KUBANC 111 . ‘ JAMES A KILBANE 111 < ‘EOI OTTANA AVE S ..t 60L0EN VALLEv |f4 : BS4lA . >r-. j •. • • A -V »! • * • •. PROP AOOR ••I:'.’;;'. HCrtCPIN COUNTY PROPERTY ttifORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY C»t«RS LIST SO 22-117-2S A2 0002 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGtdEO TRISTIN 0 ERICKSON ETAL TRISTIN 0 ERICKSON A5A7 N 76TH ST HPLS »tl 55A37 REPORT NO. PIA3SA01 PAGE IB 38 22-117-23 A2 OOIT 00038 AOORESS UNASSIGNEO BIG ISLAND INC i BIG ISLAND INC '■■■ PO BOX IBS EXCELSIOR m 65331 )!. OHNER NAME TAXPAYER , NAME/AOOR•1- •I. '•1%' I •'ivv. , ; f • .• A J*. SB ' t2-117-ES BE 0020 ; 00030 AOORESS UNA''.SIGNED N N I H LORO , BIO ISLAND.INC C/0 THOMASjA JUDO P 0 BOX IBB. „ EXCELSIOR m E5331 *:>- -iAi.-.'. • : ‘r r* TOTAL BATCH 006 0000 • : i* KK: • l\v. I I t •V * . • * il: I . I j y.*M •. ' ■ < I ; • ‘ -A . i.l- •' •r-’ I j iv. • If L •* I *:iv. ' *' *■ >’ i ■ I 'Mi l if. • I • : • ^ • I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE ' : REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIC DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARpCNJ OF PPOPJRTY TAXATIONi^TO THE BEST OF NY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF Y DEPARTMEia OF PPO^RTY TAXATIONj. TO THE I Z7i8j9fo., ' % \ ) O I I -;n * • • ' , S'l:I*’ r .'j »j; V; ■ ,• :■ ‘Xu-' .i 1 r..' t • ' •* * * ; i 1'•• • • u. •li;' ■ i ■ • •: • -r « i . 1 ». »•. ■ t ' • • • » »V •« %■ rCU ----- • • • V..•-m * •* • ^ • - - • / y.‘ - ’ 1 -3y^Mc ^ -.•-; — .;7r-^ ■»! ■ ra^i.atj'.iiii-' I I....—, .<a'j~i^<toiUi— w:W? i-w-flatf* > . ______ra^r ’_____i»^a-v«ff^;gawyiiiMatLV!aa^ *jrt^X::2X7C -f »>, . r-— .^-gg assa^^ • 1:?c £4-^ ‘^^SSL^*- ’ - - pr.' -•r 4, iftiI I tl:-r ■;f- hr-- tf ]i r. tl .• CITYof ORONO Miu.lcl|»l Offices PM Office Box 66 Co^ Bay, MinnesoCa S53ZV0066 July 2, 1991 Cell Strauss Departnent of Natural Resources Region VI Waters 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, MN 55106 RE:. Vacation of 20* alley as platted within the plat of rearrangement of Lot 1, Kitchel Subdivision of Government Lots 5 and 6 Dear Cell: » The City of Orono's Planning Commission is reviewing the request of Big Island, Inc.*s application for the vacation of the 20* alley as shown on the enclosed plat map. The entire peninsula consisting of Record Lots PID #22-117-23 42 0020 and 22-117-23 42 0019 are under single or common ownership. s currently owned, the platted alley has no functional/public use. The DNR is asked to review and comment to determine if they find anv opposition to the City approving the vocation of the platted a* u v. The City of Orono's Planning Commission will be reviewing this request at their July 15 meeting. We would appreciate your preliminary comments before that meeting. Please let me know if you need additional Information. S^cerely,9- Jeanne A. Mabusth Building a Zoning Administrator JAH/lsv TCLEFHONE - 473-7357 • FAX - 473^10 1 J m r ‘ > • -.r •.;LoimmI Ba/oL»f /.'» . V T\.^ ,n w- •• ■ > --------- »*^* ' V ,z f‘V..'v5ru:m^m ':Mm <y:Si-S#i ^r>>V i 5 XV^gMIM Ln 1 - **»> jl • V- i ^,v -'.vvNL^fc.;;.',rV' f Orono, Minnesota Wim»1 wm I BONESTRI I, ROSENE, ANDCRLIK & ASSOC, INC CONSULTING ENGINCERS St. Paul, Mliwettla HR* Planning Conunission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson %. cy, <C/. '‘'c ■' Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Adminis/^to^p July 8, 1991 C^V < #1660 Big Island, Inc. - Records Lot 12 and 19 - Variances •“ Public Hearing Prom: Date: Subject: V Zoning District: RS - Seasonal Recreational Pertinent Ordinances: Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - Swimming dock/deck is located within the 0-75 ’ setback area. Applicant proposes major repair of existing structure. No expansion is proposed. Section 10.2, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover variance within 0- 75' setback area. Allowed - O' Existing ■ 881.25 s.f. or .51% (includes other improvements) Proposed *= 881.25 s.f. or .51% (includes other improvements) List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Application Applicant's Addendum Property Owners List Hardcover Fact Sheet Survey Locating Swimming Dock/Deck Applicant's Hardship Statement: 1. 2. 3. Isv Please review Exhibit B. Only flat useable land portion of lakeshore is 15-20' above lake level. Swimming dock provides area for mothers to supervise children swimming in lake. Large rocky shoreline prevents persons sitting on existing shoreline. Applicant proposes no expansion beyond existing structure - applicant proposes repair not total restoration. August 6, 1991 .. Additional CCBBMnts and Planning Coamiission RecoMendation - The Planning Commission unanimously approved the variance application for Big Island Inc. based on the hardship statement presented by applicant reviewed above. An approval resolution for Application #1660 has been combined with the conditional use permit for the day use recreation use, enclosed with the packet information for application #1606. » r \/r.1 CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND OSE APPLICATION i I ^ PROPERTY LOCATION x° _»iZ • *• *^ •* V' 8i.t:tt Address Big Island Record Lots and 19 Prooerty Identification Number (P.I.D.) Lot 12 22-117-23-42-0020 Lot 19 22-117-23-42-0019 -. . . . . . . . . . . . ..*“•»; » I # ^4 .♦• Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. RPPLZCAIIT Name Thomas A. Judd Phone (home) 474-2049 Phone (work) 473-4402 Address 1055 E. Wavzata Blvd.. Suite 219 City Wavzata Zip SS191 (if different than applicant)Phone (home) ’V N a SI0 _ Rig JglAnHy Jna Address P.O. Box 188 Phone f. City F.xcelsior Zip S5331 Lot 12 - 6/29/84 Date Property Acquired Lot 19 - 9/12/86 _____________ I QOB9 (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. (month/year) f.WEES I W fy n - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Appxication Fee $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application §125.00 Residential accessory Cse $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) §150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments §150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg §250.00 Conanercial/Industrial Cse §200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain SitSirTS- Of laxeshor. PRD/PID - see fee schedule i ' S » APPLICATIONS §200.00 oasoioo Of &•m §175.00 § 50.00 rcial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) ,1' '■ . . > iii£. Easement Vacation 9 :au.wu Easement Vacation with Subdivision §250.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) §100.00 Appeals Other “ see fee schedule mgm f¥ntBSZHT OSB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District N Ri. Present Use of Property X Residential Otner (specify) R.^crt?atiiQnaJ^ DBSCRIPTIOH OF REQUEST Describe request in detail:Hardcover and setback variance for deck/dock the lakeshore protected arpa. See Addendum A. attached, fwr a mnrp . detailed explanation. 2. RBQUZXUO) SUBMITTALS Center 348-3271). ir land SoMt^cSonSrif , As an addendtun to this application^ please attacn a separate ^.^st of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 3. 4. 5. 5. 7. The eoDlicant and Property Owner must sign this application. P‘«fse reaember that your application is not complete if the aoove information has lOt been included. __________ j^^ification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete, faitials of Clerical Staff;- - - ----- - - - - - - - 3S n;rcS^ie«d 17 orl9i:r.l 7;rp7y;.nt ) iTraview of this application, and c^fi^ that the information supplied ia trua and correct to the best of Jr^/her/knowledge. Applicant's signature l TORB Dafe /)- The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this ^?P inthorized reasonable entry onto the property by staff, of wnti, comSiWion m.abita, and Council members for purposes of iavestigation and verification of this request, jwaer's signature ---------- Date -----Uj,y )<'•( Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 the nWn? Cosssisslon Meeting. Coroission Id?ifa"S%n"d'^o7«ch-oVtT *VpTi=a’nts musp b, present at all M;iiwV.VtVn,Vo7ihe"?i«ning'co.miasion and co^^^^ i» unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements 7onina inthorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building 9 Office of this change prior to the meeting. &ikLm p I ;V- f -i V.' ■Jl'- U:. 3;: Ik- U 0 ADDENDUM A TO DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION BIG ISLAND, INC. The hardcover and set back variance hereby requested for a deck/dock within the lake shore protected area. The deck/dock measures approximately 60* long by 12 1/2* wide. It is situated at the base of a steep hill and serves as a platform for stairs leading up to the useable portion of the property which is situated approximately 15-20* above the lake level. The deck/dock is also used as the base to extend docks for boats and used to allow parents to observe children swimming and to put towels, chairs and other beach equipment. Due to the geographical characteristics of a large rock shoreline, extremely steep bank, the deck/dock allows for a use of the shoreline for swimming, sunning, picnicking and observing children at the lake level. 7936.301 #1 "60 r V f-•: -u- ■; ^.I'-i * -••• . • *, ■,, *tf.^MH.OATI 08/S2/90 •., N' '. ;'^|‘r; H»WEP1H COUNTY PROPERTY tNFORHATION SYSTEHV1, PAOPCPTY 0*#«RS LISTH \ ‘ : ; ' 0QMS6 V' AOONESS UNASSIONED S8- 22-117-2S A2 0002 i-VOWCR NAME' •. JANES A KlUMMI . «;,t h'iTAXPAYER ' . JANES A KUIANE 111 ■';!)? i ';;(T;';;NANi/ADDR‘.,;-t01 OTTAHA ■AVE•a^#^^,-:■■. Mil*,. I -> ' i . > >. • eOLDCM VALLVV HM r < K«Al& i :!l A. * * i' i OOOSS ..ADDRESS UNASSIGNED TRISTIN O ERICKkiN ETAL TRISTIN 0 ERICKSON • PROP AOOR ; fiOtCR NAHE if TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR ,- -- - - - --M « UUZU ,( ’ '3 . V OOOSS ';.,'AOORCSS UNASSIGNEO \\ >' ^ N N A H LORO -.1 i '.yiV’ty.’lv -.iV'T •*SIO'ISLAND INC* '• • '< C/O.TNONAS A JUDO P 0 BOM IBS iXCiLSXOB MH 55S3I «• TOTAL BATCH 006 00004 A ’ I* ''at ■, ■ ■•••u*}' /fiH' ••■“{Is-'it ..Jl i-*.;. , • . . ii • *’■..'''k'.' ■ i ' % i* ■»'V.-.'•/ -t ■ / i». ' •I'lift •*• Tr• I I I ■ *• • ' tl ' ; !•' >’ REPORT MO. PIASS401.. .’i jllrt • «■ 1 • * , I» •j PAGE I 15i A'-:'•■■■ ii'i' so 22-I17-2S 02 0019 OOOSS ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO I ' BIO ISLAND IMC^J, o'ij . 'I ’ BIG ISLAND INCfe, i ‘T; ; ,’ j PO BOX IBS- Ilf!'.' l it- !ii .■ I • ' ! • '• EXCELSIOR ttl .;'B5SSr j . ‘ . t ' i. i, ! .' Vi- ' ■•, '-.11'.J tl I : I-' ; '• ?» :i ' I'M ■ 1' -i 1 . it■ 'N\'- ./•I.'; ,■■■• ) M ' t.^'S r #1 'r"'; * -V !1 : t . ‘ lit- * * * I. ' i * '■■..u J • ■ ■ I ‘ i' I ’ I* • i. « • % • 'i. J.- s: lift!* • • • / ; *.*•1 “a *. * ^ ‘ • t * ■ i *1 I . • f • - * "! ■’•'It;: .*1 Tntwt V ■j ! I ,• I* \ !!C;:''VtlAij' I;’."’.j," '- I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND.TRUE . REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS ! OF THE HEMCPIN COUNTY DEPAR OF NY RNONLEDGE AND BELIEF . 1 -I: i i i I--. Y DEPARpCNT OF PROPERTY TAXATION|,TO THE BEST • ^ ^ .h' I J .l.r; ..'I i ^ I !. ■ ' * . . 1* A . si ; ■ • ■ 'tv? '■ • •-H 'n- \ » i i » ‘ *. : , r >* \ / -fl’ ' 4 i‘ ■’t -•'r. * ’ »• t, ' • -.iji '.1'{ «i ■ ' . . • 'IV Mi,;Vv.., ■ r ■ •ki --!’ ;; ..v ,v I V * 1 ■ • ' .‘ir ' • i • : <• '-.i • • t ;!. • . I ^ ; *1 • p • • j' .* -F . f; ■ -li vl* * 1 ( '■ 1 !■! ♦ 11 I• 1 ( •I ! ■ \ . # • I r-t ' .!•. » •f r. • ’I I- I »/■ v:i. :r t't :''v K 1'^ f-s. HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK bo.E: (c.bcle onO 7T-250' 250-5C3- SOO-IOCO' Existing Hardcover in Zone A. House _ LENGTH B. Garage c. D riveway D. Sidewalk E.MaaJDeck 62.5 E.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY RUSTIC SHEETING 6. Other _ X width 12^ Volley-Ball Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone _ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S. F S.F S.F. S.F S.F. S.F. S.F. 7fi1.25 S.F. _ _ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 100 S.F 881.25 S.F. 173,625 S.F. •) !• • n y t v'i B 881.25 T| 173.625 ■_ X 100 00.51 % !■’ To: Pros: Datex Mayor Peterson and City Council John Gerhardson, Acting City Administrator <• . ^ August 6, 1991 A Subject: #1606 Big Island Inc., Record Lots 12 and 19 - / Conditional Use Permit - Resolution Sosting District - RS, seasonal recreational Pertinent Ordinances - Section 10.31, Subdivision 3 (C) - Required lot area ■ 5 acres (1 acre per 20 users) Area exclusive of vacated alley - 4.74 acres Area of alley ■» .28 acres Total a ea upon completion of vacation = 5.02 acres (refer to application #1659 for detail on vacation application). Section 10.31, Subdivision 6 (B) - Tax parcel combination required upon vacation. Proposed single use for both record lots requires legal combination. Refer to Exhibit V, the third paragraph of Mr. Judd's letter advises why legal combination is not possible at this time. The City has asked that the applicant execute a special lot combination to insure legal status as a single unit based on the code's directives (refer to Exhibit U). Section 10.31, Subdivision 9 - Hardcover. Review Exhibits Dl, D2 and G. 0-75* Setback Area = 165,000 s.f. Existing Hardcover = 2,255 s.f.* or 1.4% 75-250* Setback Area = 72,837 s.f. Existing Hardcover = 4,809.8 s.f. or 6.6% Please note stciff did not include hardcover areas for 4' stairways leading to lake use areas. These improvements are consistent with allowed structure within the 0-75* setback area. Note also volleyball court is considered hardcover because it is underlain with plastic. Section 10.31, Subdivision 8 (A) - Lakeshore setbacks. The major repair of wooden swimming dock has been reviewed under application #1660. The major repair of non-conforming structure requires variance approval. The dock/deck is located completely within the 0-75* setback area. LMCD code Section 2.03, allowed dock length. Allowed “ 100* Previous Year = 125' Current Year = 100'- ‘Is Zoning File #1606 August 6, 1991 Page 2 of 5 The current water level will not necessitate extension of dock beyond 100'. List of Exhibits ** A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map Dl, D2 - Hardcover Fact Sheets E - Official Record Lot Map of Big Island F - Septic Report 6/21/82 G - Current Survey - Judd Letter 1/17/85 - Staff Letter 1/31/85 - Staff Letter 6/7/90 - Newspaper Article - Bylaws - Articles of Amendment - Joint Use Dock License - Debra Page's Letter 11/12/90 - Debra Page's Letter 7/11/91 - Planning Conunission Minutes 11/19/90 - Planning Commission Action Notice 11/27/90 - City Attorney's Opinion - Staff Letter 5/3/91 - Judd Memo - Special Lot Combination - Judd's Letter 6/18/91 H I J K L M N 0 P QR S T U V History of Property - Refer to Exhibits C and E, the entire property referred to as Lot 1, Kltchel's Subdivision of Government Lots 5 and 6; and Lots 2 through 15 were under c ion ownership prior to 197t. The property was divided into two acre parcels meeting the then- cur.'^nt two acre minimum requirement. In 1978, Record Lot 12 was sold and a seasonal dwelling was erected on the property tha same year* Some time in the early 1980s» Big Island j-nc. acquired Record Lot 19 and in 1986 acquired Record Lot 12. Please review Exhibits H and P» the Planning Commission minutes provide background as to why there was a delay in Mr. Judd's filing of a conditional use permit for Big Island Inc. It would appear that an informal group operated a day use recreation area on Record Lot 19 prior tc 1986. After an earlier contact with Orono staff/ Big Island Inc. was advised of the need for a conditional use permit for such use and for an area variance because Record Lot 19 was approximated at 1.7 acres. Mr. Judd was contacted after the staff letter of January 31, 1985 (Exhibit I)/ and advised of the difficulty of such an application if such an excessive area variance was required, and especially since the property was under one ownership prior to the original division. Big Island Inc. proceeded with acquisition of Record Lot 12. Zoning File #1606 August 6, 1991 Page 3 of 5 Since operation, the City has received r' oogative comments from adjacent property owners, iior from • „iier land owners on Big Island. Please review Exhibits N a'.. 0, letters from the attorney for the Erickson interest, an adj;.'- nt r roperty owner. Throug^lv■^ it the review the Planning Commiss'on noted the concerns represented by the attorney. Several of the conditions set forth in approving the conditional use permit have been adopted from recommendations by Ms. Page. Review of Current Implication - The applicants , * ouose a day use recreation area o’/t :-d i Minnesota corporation. The activities cited by Mr. Jud -i. .;ec:x to be consistent with all standards set forth in the RS .iir rict code for a day use recreation area. Staff can confirm th.a upon an inspection of the facility during the winter months, tlv t the majority of those standards wer“ satisfied by the association. The need for a phone has been met. Phones have been installed within the interior of the cabin and in a three season porch that remains unlocked throughout the year. Both septic inspectors have made an inspection of the facility this summer and noted no problem with the existing septic system. The use has not involved intensified development of the property and there is adequate undisturbed area available for suitable on-site septic use. The septic inspector will also be advised that this facility should be inspected or monitored on an annual basis and this action shooll be made a condition of this approval. Staff has reviewed the level of use propose ’ for overnight campiiig with the applicants. The applicants have advised that the cabin is sometimes use for overnight use and that two families have been known to tent at tha facility. Based on the level of use, we would classify this as occasional overnight camping and covered by code under the current day use conditional use permit. A cyclone fen e has been installed along the steep banks of the cliff tn provide safety. The City would recuire this fencing if the apr'ication is approved for day use reation. This would h- consist with what was required cf the Bin Island Veteran s Camp ^ay use t.-jation cortditioni 1 use permit. r-. Zoning File #1606 August S, 1991 Page 4 of 5 Issue of Legitiioacy of Applic20it6 a MeiBbership vs. User Level - 1. (REVIEN EXHIBIT R, CITY ATTORNEY'S OPINION) Lon-profit corporation. Big Island Inc. is a for-profit corporation. Ms. Shapiro's opinion notes the corporation does not pay dividends nor do shareholders realize any profit in the event assets of the corporation appreciate. But if the corporation is dissolved pursuant to the sale of th:5 property, current shareholders would share in the disposition of the proceeds of that sale. This would suggest that this corporation is for-profit rather than non profit. Ms. Shapiro is not convinced that the RS code requires that an association be for non-profit. Big Island Inc. is made up of unrelated individuals who meet at Big Island for group activities. All are permitted activities under the RS code. There is nothing in the cede that suggests that this association/private club must be a non profit club or association. B.Membership vs. User Level. Ms. Shapiro has also reviewed the bylaws as they relate to membership and number of shareholders, noting that tota] membership at 100 wxth an average family size of 2.5 coulu result in 250 persons in attendance at one time. Please refer to Pages 2 and 3 of applicant's most recent letter, Exhibit V. Mr. Judd advises tnat your code discusses number of users and not membership numbers. The number of users at any one time must bo limited 100. Judd advises that the average number of • ’ay ers is less than lO and the average number of J users at any given t'.ine is less than 20. Two to t times during a summer season, users may exceed 50. If t» 1 lub were to ever have a group function that involved more than 100 users, a large assembly permit would be required. In the Big Island Veteran's ramp operation, the City never asked for th total nu; per of veterans that were part of that association, but mere y limited the user level to the existing area. The code lin^ts the number of users for Big Island Inc. to 100 at any ont time. Planning CoamdsBion Recosoiendation - The Planning Commission , ''mmended unanimous approval of the conditional use permit for g Island Inc. that would propose a day use recreation area f- £*cord Lots 12 and 19 finding all standards of the RS district iiave been satisfied. Such approval is based on the following conditions; 1. Applicants shall file a special lot combinatior for Record Lots 12 and 19. Zoning File #1606 August 6, 1991 Page 5 of 5 2. If at any time a special activity results in the attendance of more than 100 users at the facility# a responsible agent of the association shall apply for a large assembly permit from the City of Orono. 3. As applicants will not require a dock length variance for their boat dock, applicants are advised to complete the filing of a joint use dock license with the City for the 1991 season. It is recommended that the applicant be limited to 15 slips based on the current level of use. 4. On-site septic inspector must complete an annual inspection of the septic systems during late spring/early summer months. Applicant to provide transport if inspection is not a part of regular inspection schedule for Big Island. 5. Fire ring shown on the site plan for the day use recreation area shall be subject to special fire protection standards set forth for Big Island recreation areas, i.e. supply of water and sand, blanket, and bucket. 6. Applicants shall be responsible for submitting all proposed changes in bylaws related to membership to City for review prior to any formal action by Big Island Inc. The enclosed resolution has been drafted approving both the conditional use permit for day use recreation area and the variance for repair of the swimming deck/dock within the 0-75 ’ setback area (application #1660). 4 / o o CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ______ A RSSOLOTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.31, SUBDIVISION 3 (C) AND VARIANCES TO SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 & 2 FILES #1606 & 1660 WHEREAS, Thomas C. Judd, an authorized agent of Big Island Inc., a Minnesota corporation, (hereinafter "the applicant.*) has an Interest in the property located on Big Island, Orono classification. Record Lots 12 and 19, within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows : Refer to Exhibit A, attached (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, per Section 10.31, Subdivision 3 (C) the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit to allow a day use recreation area with occasional over*- night camping at a maximum user level of 100 and variances to Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2 that would allow the repair of an existing swimming dock/deck located within the 0-75* lake- shore protected area where no structures or hardcover are allowed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. These app** ications were reviewed as Zoning Files #1606 and 1660. 2. The property is located in the RS Seasonal Recreational Zoning District. Per Sect.') on 10.31, Subdivision 3 (C)l - One acre in area is needed for each 20 users. The day use recreation facility will be limited to 100 users based on the existing 5.02 acres. 3. On July 15, 1991, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the applications as proposed and recommended approval based on the following findings: Page 1 of 5 O: O ter CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _____ A) The 5.02 acre site is large enough to support a day use recreation area and occasional overnight camping use without any adverse effect upon the lake or upon the adjacent wetlands located within the western portion of the subject property. B) The proposed use will have no negative impact upon the neighboring adjacent properties. C) Based on the proposed level of use» the fire protection system developed by the Orono staff for Big Island and the bylaws developed by applicant will provide the necessary precautionary steps to maintain the public safety and welfare. D) The proposed use will require no variances to the required standards set forth in Section 10.31, Subdivision 3 (C). E) The existing dock/deck will not be expanded and will maintain its present configuration. The dock shall sustain structural repairs only. F) The only flat usable land portion of lakeshore is 15-20' above the lake level. The swimming dock provides area for parents to supervise children swimming in lake. G) The large, rocky shoreline prevents persons from using existing shoreline. 4, The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow a day use recreation area with occasional overnight camping will not be be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 5 o o '•'V <5* CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances for the repair of an existing swimming dock would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danager to neighboring properties; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would he in keeping with the spirit and intent of the zoning code and Comprehensive P3an of the City. 6, The City Council has considered these applications including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comirients of the applicant and the affect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.31, Subdivision 3 (C) to permit a day use recreation area with occasional overnight caunping at Record Lots 12 and 19, Big Island, for Big Island Inc., subject to the following conditions: 1. Big Island Inc. shall be limited to 15 slips at the shared joint use dock. Any attempt to increase the number of slips shall require an amendment of this conditional use permit and the filing of a new conditional use permit with the appropriate notice to adjacent property owners. 2. Applicant shall file a special lot combination of Record Lo*-s 12 and 19 with the City. 3. If at any time a special activity results in the attendance of more than 100 users at the facility, a responsible agent of the association shall apply for a large assembly permit at the City of Orono. Page 3 of 5 'i; f/O... o CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.______________ 4. Applicant to provide transport to Big Island for annual inspection of existing septic system to determine if existing system meets needs of approved day use recreation area. 5. Applicant shall provide immediate fire protection for fire ring shown on site plan. Such protection is subject to the special standards developed for Island recreation areas by the City of Orono's building department. This protection shall con::lst of a supply of sand, water, bucket and blanket. 6. Applicant shall be responsible for submitting all proposed changes in bylaws related to r^embership to City for review prior to formal action by board of Big Island Inc. 7. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be completed within one year of the date of Council approval or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (August 12, 1992). 8. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a isdemeanor. 9. The undersigned representative of Big Island Inc. has read* understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of Big Island Inc., its successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 12th day of August, 1991. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City C) rk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Thomas C. Judd, an Authorized Agent of Big Island Inc Page 4 of 5 y, yy no, o I! 1^,/ CITYof ORONO • \ ^ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _ _ _ _ _ ■ STATE OP MINNESOTA ) } 8S. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of August^ 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson fc Dorothy M, Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) S6. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199 before me a Notary Public within and for • '.d county, personally appeared Thomas C, Judd, an authorl; agt* t for Big Island Inc, known to me to be the person(s) desci...>ed ii. and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged tha he (they) executed the same as his Itheir) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 5 of L "t. c V Ip f EXHIBIT A All that part of Lot 1, Rearrangement of Lot 1, Kitchel's Subdivision of Government Lots 5 and 6 in Section 22, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying southwesterly of a line running from the northwesterly most corner of Lot 7, said Rearrangement of Lot 1, Kitchel's Subdivision, to the midpoint of the northwesterly lire of said Lot 1, said Rearrangement of Lot 1 , Kitchel's Subdivision, and also all of Lots 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15, Rearrangement of Lot 1, Kitchel's Subdivision of Government Lots 5 and 6, Section 22, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lots 2, 3, 4, 5 and that part of Lot 1, lying Northeasterly of a line running from the most Northwesterly corner of Lot 7 to the midpoint of the Northwesterly line of said Lot 1 , all in Rearrangement of Lot 1, Kitchel's Subdivision in Government Lots 5 and 6 in Sec. 22, T. 117, R. 23, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota. I lj> 0 jc / > CITY OP ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address RL 19, RL 12_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _^ j . XrrJtr It “"I i A A.' iV_ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 22-117-23-47-^01 a 22-11 7-7 w2-002Q — . T - .’t.nV. « > r VI u rtcnru Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. _ _ _ _ - - - -——-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -iT’r'!!?!' '/^rw j^p^][Qjyi7 Phor.e (home) 474 -204y y f *: 7> M I Name Thomas A. Judd f;':Tr:c.T_7UAi(i' vnn Phone (work) 473-440a>:o?> rnni TfPrA^ j^ddrsss 1055 East Weyzete Blvd>city Wayzata, MN Zip 55391 K'l/Oi - C.’J, W IV OWNER (j.f different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Big Island, Inc.Phone Address P.O. Box 188 City Excelsior, MN Zip 55331 Date Property AcquiredLord-6/29/84 Donnelley-9/12/86 (month/year) I {9K) (do not) also o%m the adjacent parcels of land. f. - r rp‘ FEES - CONDITIONAL USB PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest Ho ise/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Coromercial/Industria 1 T: ^ c $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of la)ceshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule APPLICATIONS _ _ _ $200.00 $250.00 ~ $175.00 $ 50.00 $250.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Appeals Other - see fee schedule FRBSBNT USB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential T Other (snecify) Rr-r.rpnr inn.Tl DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail: Application for a conditional use permit pursuant to Sec. 10.31 Subdiv. J(C) - Liav use Recreation ~ 2. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Heni.epin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. YOU ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Departme Initials of Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ V-.r.and Use Application is complete. Date AFP^^'CAET'S SIGNATURE T*" pplicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or req Jted by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and c^rti^iesi^^at the information supplied is true and correct to the jS^at of/hl^hep k.jrfqJ'' edge. Applicant 's signature Date ek4 hi QMNBR8 SIGNATURE The owner hereby acicnowledges and agre^ to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation/'NlIff'"7Nri<ication of t^his request. Owner's signature ^nd verlf ture" Vt Date Applicant must have all submittals into thcXcity offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Cosunission Meetings are held on the third Monday of ear;* month. Applicants must bv present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Ccimnission and Coui -til. If an applicant is unai^le to attend a scheduled ii'eet...ng, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your olace and advise the Building s Zoning Office of this charge prior to the meeting. 4U. V♦ IMM DATE 99/tt/fO. . T .•*. -IIMTCH 004 : ' 4-' raop Amm (MCR KAHi TAXPAYER « NAME/AOOR \ < • I M ■‘tt>U7-2S 42 0001 1 DOOM : AOORESS UNASSIGNEO JAHES'A KILBANE III JAMES A RILBANE III 201 OTTANA AVE S GOLDEN VAUC *tl S54U , I I 5022-117-23 42 0020 00050 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED Hfrt€PlN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY CM4CRS LIST 56 22-117-25 42 0002 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGI^D TRISTIN 0 ERICKSON ETAL TRISTIN 0 ERICKSON 4567 H 78TH ST MPLS MN 55457 OIMER NAME j H N A H LOAD TAXPAYER ' ' I DIO ISLAND INC ! NAK/AODR C/0 TNONAS A JUDD , P 0 DOX 188 EXCELSIOR M4 65SS1 TOTAL BATCH 006 00004 REPORT NU. PX4S5401 PACE 15•» I 1. S8 22-117-2S 42 0014 000S8 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO DIG ISLAND INC BIG ISLAND INC po BOX laa EXCELSIOR m 55351 ' (• I • 8 • ■ V * I? t •’1f. a 1 I •“i j; 8 ♦ t- •rt 't 1*. 4 % ‘ #160G % f- • 4. I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION 0 INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS OAT^ ON THE RECOROr OF THE HENNEPIN OUNTY DEPARpCK^ OF PROPiRTY TAXAFlONiuTO THE BEST ~F HY KNGHLEDGE AND BELIEF OAT • / '•i I. V- . ■ i V- < ‘ I V. >' . ri :i."' i 1 -t V? giT !i| ?S-y| \ J -•/ ^< '/*• . ■ , J ^ t k >5-^ ^* m: % • »I ^ ;i.- ' ^., 1.' # tl.• •• * i* ' iA ! in. #• J./ «[•«• M' f**? fci54! iT 4*k I i:. s » 'ir •>. HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' .75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone A. H ouse 2_iUl « 'I-' _ length ? p WIDTH r: V I < B. fiARAfig 3)E2-o U,3^ f.Lanoscape S1Z2. AREAS UNDERLAIN BY ____ PLASTIC SHEETING Ao !/CC •- G. Other . Total H ardcover in Zone Total Property A rea in Zone IZ. .&2T7 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. KV' f' '• r. nRIVFWAV X S S.F. X S.F. ■ • • r>» « t.? f't n. StftPWALK3)r.:i.O X C _«S.F. W |v'w. ■i'ii:' m p'' _ X 3 ^7-S1 F • /E) ifi 1 X rJ 3 S^..5 S.F. e. Patio/ Deck X iz^.o S.F. : S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. vH % 4,';eA-6 S.F. 171 4fn^4 6V^ X 100 LiAjt. A .F. lU % .... . p' i-' si: m mi- »■ -m- i 1,. fev 0- ■hp^.K' ./ / HARDCOVER CALC'JUTION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE): Q-75- 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone 1 Ac House X s __ - S.F. f- ■I-1^' Iv pwgr' LENGTH WIDTH X S.F. X s.p. •X a S.F. ^ -r' . X S.F. SiV,B.Garage _ X S.F. #? S-K: ‘ * 'V V •?-..- p t. 6^^' s^t- f#; rm'^ok' !v-‘ » C.Driveway X S.F. X _. _S.F. 0.Sidewalk X S.F. X S.F. te- ' ' ‘ 6^>'2L X S.F. 'E.IatioA ECK U>1 ? , H’- ...A. A/^.2!X .» . S”^,S.F. P, LAMDSCAPef) ^*0 AREAS \ UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING 6. Other X \ leo ♦ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.Fis^I"<AJU^ Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone (CrSooC 0 ZAOZ iC:.<.ccvD X 100 i.*!- A .F. [T] % Mmm si-" mi DEERINC ISLAMO INSERT OFFICIAL RECORD LOT MAP NIineTONKA BEACH ■mriNcioH roiNT MCKATIOI PniNT |.:'y«au; MT T-- CROWN rOtUT ■ Khi •" I lani .« j ONSITE SEWAGE TREATMENT INSPECTION REPORT On the Sortb Shore of Lake Minnetonka POST OFFICE BOX 66 1335 S. Brown Rd. Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 5'- AVi- OWNER PHONE S ________________ADDRESS fsLA*^^ PERMIT NO'S. :S~S~P7 ____________DATES —---------------- City Ordinsnci No. 210 rtquim that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis. Tho on-alto sewage treatment lyat*™ ebove address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below: :0i Meets or exceeds current city standards in all respects relating to design, construction, and location. Appears to be operating properly. □ 2 Does not meet current city standards in some respects relating to design, construction, or location. Appears to be operating properly. □ 3 Does not meet current city standards in many respects relating to design, construction, or location. Appears to be operating adaquanly. '/ »'V ’V □ 4 Isf. r-' OOM not meet current city standards of design, construction or location, is being overused, or is failing to property treat and dispose of the currant input and is therefore endangering a water supply, is a source of pollution to surface or groundwaters, is creating a safety hazard, or is otherwise creating a public nuisance. Please contact the inspector to discua requirements for repairs to your system. Soil tasting may be re quired. In all«-—• a design and site plan must be submitted for review. Your contractor must obtain a permit before work it started. V'WORK REQUIRED: '-i Septic tanks must be pumped within 48 hours. n Orainfield muat be repaired or replaced within 90 days. Inspection riaar (4** diam. pipe) mutt ba installed in each tank. Tank inspection Indicates maintanHSca pumpout is needed as soon as possible. Gty ordinance requires that tanka ba pumped out every three years. ■I- i'v •yr, t: ' RITE CHARACTERISTICS: Umidns Site Faeton jSsiopo □SeH QHI^iwatar table □totaiaa ^Uba. wetland, or stream □Orabiaga Potential for System Failure (depends on soil types, water table, and system condition) )R(low Q Medium □ High □ System is causing visible surface discharge. Site Capabilities for Future Expansion Q Adequate Fair ^Poor □ Inadequata COMMENTS:^C/tY A Kit t - y7Atg ' ________---------------------------------------------------------------------_-j--------------------------------- Data of Inspection Septic System Ini^or This reoort must be keot on the premises with system location end pumping records. W i Hs. Jeanne Mabusth City of Orono June 18, 1991 Page Four of Five I would like to emphasize that even though the number of members including the family members may approach or exceed 100, that the ordinance refers to "users", not members, and specifies a limit of 20 users per acre as a limit. As stated above, the number of users on the highest use dates does not exceed 100 and the average daily and weekend number of users is well below the limit. ffith respect to some other issues that we discussed that are raised in the ordinance regarding Conditional Uses, I have attached a memorandum which addresses each specific requirement. In closing, I would like to comment on the nature of the ownership, management and use of Big island, Inc. of and by its members. The management of Big Island, Inc. is accomplished through a board of directors. One-third of the board is elected each year. The rationale is continuity of management; therefore, only one-third of the membership of the board rotates off each year. Officers are elected every other year, and, usually the officers are veterans of various committees. A number of committees exist, which include a finance committee, a membership committee, a social committee, a rules and conduct committee and a grounds and docks committee. Each committee fully functions within its scope, purpose and authority. One example of a rule is that each member that owns a boat must furnish the organizati'^n with a certificate of insurance to protect the wner the h-;>at, the occupants of the boat and Big Island, '’’he vvent of a mishap. All boat owners ^’we expected to have their boats registered and meet all of the safety requirements, including a fire extinguisher and life preservers. If a boat owner does not provide a certificate of insurance to Big Island, that member is not allowed to dock at Big island, Inc. To the casual observer, our use of Big Island, Inc. would not ordinarily be viewed any differently than any single family residence on Big Island or, for that matter, on the lake. During the week, an observer would likely see only one or two boats, if any, tied up during the day (or evening) . During a weekend, an observer would likely see anywhere from two to six boats tied up any time, with the exception of Memorial Day, Fourth of July and Labor Day. Our use has and is intended and designed to be well within the spirit and intent of Day-Use Recreation Area Ordinance. IK‘ 4/ Ns. Jeanne Mabusth City of Orono June 18, 1991 Page Three of Five held, what the anticipated number of users would be. In the event that it appears that there would be an excess of 100 users for an event, we can set up a procedure wher'aby we would notify you that an event is being held at which the number of users could exceed 100. However, I an advised that it is highly unlikely given the current and expected membership of the organization that it would exceed 100 users at any time. (2)You have been provided with an updated survey confirming the buildable area of the property, I have also attached a copy of that survey with this letter. (3)As stated above, I have enclosed herewith a Vacation Application for the alley which meanders through the property. (4)A chec: in the amount of $150.00 is enclosed for the after-the-fact/penalty Land Use Application. (5)Per your letter to me dated May 3, 1991, you have advised me that the building staff has an inspected the Club House facility. With respect to your May 3, 1991 letter to me regarding Application Humber 1606, the only issue that I do not believe that I have responded to is the City's concern regarding the total ■eldership and actual membership statistics, with respect to the total nenbership, as stated above, the total combined sharer outstanding under the amended bylaws is 65, which includes botn Class A and Class B shares. it is my understanding that there is a consensus among the members that the membership should be limited, that it is likely that only a few new members will be added in the foreseeable future and that departing members will most likely keep the membership level around 40-45. We could respond to the City's concern regarding total membership by providing a notice to the City of Orono before the Bylaws would be amended to allow more members. I am forwarding to you under separate cover a membership roster reflecting the membexo, their addresses and number of children. As you pointed out when we reviewed a preliminary list in your office, you noted that mpproximately one-guarter of the members lived on Lake Minnetonka and that another 4 to 6 members lived on other nearby lakes. I think that it is important to note that these members cherish lake living and truly value their membership for the use and enjoyment of a piece of Lake Minnetonka in the setting that we have on Big Island. h br-' -r.- t f'\ \/ Ms. Jeanne Mabusth City of Orono June 18, 1991 Page Two of Five (1)I have been provided a copy of the opinion of the City attorney concerning the legality of the Application by Big Island, I.ic. for a conditional use permit. One of the issues addressed by Ms. Pace-Shapiro related to whether or not Big Island, Inc. is a for-profit corporation. Please be advised that Big Island, Inc. was incorporated under Minnesota Statutes Annotated Section 302A (the most common "for-profit” statute). However, please note that Big Island, Inc. is not and does not intend to be a for-profit corporation. It is presently operating on a break-even or loss basis and expects to do so for the foreseeable future. Another issue raised by Ms. Pace-Shapiro related to the discrepancy between the number of shares authorized under the Articles of Amendment and the number of shares permitted under the Amended Bylaws of Big Island, Inc. Please be advised that while the Articles allow for the issuance of 100 shares of Class A and 100 shares of Class B, the amended bylaws restrict the Issuance to a total of 65 combined Class A and Class B shares. There are presently approximately 41 Class A shares outstanding and, I believe, less than 20 shares of Class B outstanding. It should be noted that Class B shares may only be held by family members of a shareholder of Class A stock. The purpose of the Class B shares is to provide junior memberships to family members of Class A shareholders. Another issue raised by Ms. Pace-Shapiro relates to Section 10.31, subdivision 3(c)(1) of the Orono City Code. Ms. Pace-Shapiro recites a portion of this section "if the number of expected number of users at any one time exceeds 100, the minimum lot area required shall be maintained to obtain a ratio of at least 1 acre per 20 users. I would like to emphasize the use of the word "users" as opposed to "members". Presently, the average number of weekday users is less than 10 and the average number of weekend users at any given time is less than 20. There are two or three days during the summer that the use would likely exceed 50 users at any one time and those days are Memorial Day, the 4th of July and Labor Day. I have been advised that the maximum number of users at any one of those given dates has not exceeded 80, with possibly one exception in 1985 or 1986. A committee sponsors each special even^ that is held at the Island and reservations are taken for each event. Big Island, Inc. would or should know, before each event is ii ‘.r 'L ^V; Hassel & Enlow A professional association FIRST national BANK BUILDING 1055 EAST WAYZATA BOULEVARD WAY2.ATA. MINNESOTA 55391 1/ Ttk-srHONf (ei«)473^oa FACSiWILE l6'2i 473-44)5 June 18, 1991 Ns. Jeanne A. Mabusth Building ft Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 ft X i sJ u RE: Application Number 1606 Conditional Use Permit - Big Island, Inc. Dear Jeanne: I am forwarding to you herewith a Variance Application for the swimming deck/dock located on the southeasterly shoreline of the property. I have attached an addendum to the Application which describes unusual characteristics of the subject property for which the variance is requested. I have also enclosed a Application for the vacation of the 20 foot wide alley which meanders across the middle of the property. As you may recall, the updated survey reflects acreage of 5.02 acres for the combined lots; however, the survey did not exclude the alley. The alley serves no useful purpose for the present use of the property and was dedicated to serve the 14 small lots which had originally been platted on the property. The vacation of the alley would allow the applicant to meet the minimum acreage requirement for the intended conditional use. Z have also enclosed a proposed special lot combination form for the two parcels. Please note that I have revised the form for its special application to these two lots. l believe that it still meets the intent and purpose with respect to the original form. As you will recall, one parcel is owned by Big Island, Inc. in fee, subject to a mortgage of Donnelly Company. The other parcel is being purchased on a contract for deed. Due to the status of title of both properties and the encumbrance on the property with the Donnelly SK>rtgage, is not feasible at this time to legally combine the lota. I have submitted the proposed special lot combination form to the board of directors of Big Island, Inc. for their review and approval. With respect to the checkoff list contained in the original notice to the Planning Commission action sent to me on November 27, 1990, our response is as follows: St. 1.. . :P‘ : 'O ■m''m. if:' v< k: kU k m Sf. K%;;-|i-:pr #: # fc^-... CITY OF ORONO GRANTOR(S) Big Island, Inc. Mayor Its And City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowle’'ed before me this day of . 1991, by __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _— and _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . respectively the _ _ _ _ _ and Big Island Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Publ:.c 4824.303/129106 lA 2. Grantor(s) agree to restrict and limit the use and/or Orono City Code. 3. Grantee shall not issue any building permit, zoning variance or conditional use permit for any structure or use on the properties inconsi:>tent with the covenants contained herein. 4. Grantor hereby grants to Grantee the right to enter upon the above described properties for the purposes of inspection and enforcement of the covenants contained herein, and, subject to reasonable written notice, to cause to be lawfully removed from these properties without any liability any structures, uses, substances and natural or unnatural materials inconsistent with the covenants contained herein. 5, In addition to any other remedy Grantee may have, the 5SjS “JSnr%™^or''wir?s''?n''^CsLS!orSf ”^ shall pay to Grantee all costs and expenses including attorneys fees incurred by Grantee in enforcing the terms of this indenture. 6. The terms and conditions of this indenture may be modified, S*2Sbdivided?^II2ld“Sepa?ately®Sr^ part only „ time of such application. 7, Grantor(s) agree that recording of this Indenture shall not vest any property rights in the properties and that any zoning or development authorities granted herein or hereinafter because of this indenture shall remain subject to future regulation, modification and/or limitation by Grantee or other regulatory bodies in accordance with legally applicable and enforceable soning or other ordinances of Grantee. otherwise, except as hereinabove set forth. The term of this Agreement shall be from the date of first occur. Xll provisions hereof shall run with the land and shall extend to and bind the heirs, successors, representatives, grantees or assigns of the respective parties hereto. r I ti tl': :■■< ■i-'.- ip- m £: Vij.K\ li^‘ t i.rK-; u. SPECIAL LOT COMBINATION AGREEMENT This indenture is made and entered into this day of 1991, by and between Big Island, Inc., their heirs. successors and assigns (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Grantor") and the City of Orono, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, its successors and assigns (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of real property in the City of Crono, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, legally described as follows (and hereinafter collectively referred to as the "properties"): See Attached Exhibit A (hereinafter described as "Parcel A"); and See Attached Exhibit B (hereinafter described as "Parcel B"); and WHEREAS, Parcel A and Parcel B are adjacent to each other but are presently described as two separate parcels and were/are presently owned by two different owners which prevents their being combined into one legally described lot or parcel, and/or for the same reason the Hennepin County Assessor can not combine Parcel A and Parcel B into one parcel for tax purposes; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding the above it is the intent of Grantor(s) and Grantee that Parcel A and Parcel B are and shall Imminently be held in common ownership by the same person or persons, and further that Parcel A and Parcel B are intended to be used and/or developed in common by Grantor as if they were in fact one parcel instead of two. NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable consideration, Grantor(s) hereby covenant, grant, gift, quit claim and convey to Grantee the right to restrict, and Grantor hereby agrees to restrict, limit and preclude the ownership, use, improvement and developBient of Parcel A and Parcel B according to and under the conditions and covenants herei.i contained during the term hereof, as follows: 1. Grantor(s) agree that Parcel A and Parcel B shall henceforth be contained in common use and ownership even if recorded as separate lots or parcels, and that Parcel A and Parcel B will not be used, conveyed, sold, or leased except together as if they were a single parcel. Mil MEMORANDUM r i"'fM» si .-r>- K" It. '^- i k |is hr h h t* i ¥'f- ’■■r . TO: Jeanne A. Mabusth, -cning Administrator City of Orono FROM: Thomas A. Judd, Esq. Big Island, Inc. RE: Requirements for Conditional Use Permit Day Use Recreation Area Orono City Code 10.31, Subd. 3C (1-9) (1) The average number of weekday users is less than 10, and the average number of weekend users is less than 20. There are three days or functions during the year. Memorial Day, Fourth of July and Labor Day, which usually result in 50-60 users and may approach 80 on an exceptional holiday. As Big Island, Inc. hosts these functions on an RSVP basis, it could advise the City of Orono if it expects more than 100 users for any given function. (2) The shoreline width exceeds 200 feet. (3) The joint-use dock license from the City has been applied for and the application is in the process of being submitted to LMCD, Further, the number of slips do not exceed the limit of one slip per 50 feet of shoreline. (4) The swimming area is suitably marked and it is presently situated inside marker buoys. (5) The on-site sewage treatment is a septic system which has been Inspected by the City. (6) All buildings or structures are existing and no new structures are intended to be built in the foreseeable future. If any are to be constructed, the City would be advised through the permit procedure. (7) The property is presently provided with a telephone line, and a service is being installed for emergency use. (8) It la my understanding that the subject property complies with Paragraph 8. (9) The property will be legally combined into one tax parcel when title to the property so allows; however, in the interim, a special lot combination form has been prepared and has been submitted for approval. 6696.304/06.118 Thomas Judd» Hassel & Enlow Re: Application #1606 - Big Island Inc., Conditional Use Permit May 3, 1991 Page 2 of 2 In your re—submittal information, please address the discrepency between the number of membership shares available under the Articles of Amendment and the 2unended By-Laws of Big Island Inc. The Articles of Amendment limit shares to a total of 200? the amended By-Laws limit issuance of shares to 65. How will you respond to the City's concern that total membership be limited to 100? Can you provide actual membership statistics (i.e. spouse, children, etc.)7..or have you any other ideas in addressing these concerns? Tom, I have enclosed a special lot combination form for your review. We understand the difficulties with the inability to legally combine both parcels. The execution of the special lot combination during this interim period will address the City's concerns. I have also enclosed a copy of the original notice of Planning Commission action sent to you November 27, 1990 that will provide an additional check off list to assure a complete preparation for your second review before the Planning Commission. Lyle Oman and I would like to have you convey our greatfulness to Pat Hanily for showing us the facility. Improvements shown on plans have more meaning when you are to visit the site and see them, especially on a sunny, bright day. Onfortunately, if you have had a chance to review the dead line schedules for upcoming meetings, you will know that you are unable to make the May agenda. In fact, I suggest, Tom, that we meet at your earliest convenience to discuss the preparation of the submittals for an upcoming Planning Commission meeting. Give me a call at your convenience. Sincerely, / < - JAM/tin Enclosures Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Administrator s-r . m VK--, 't.- T. -y *»■« r I I t’- [ft i ctr^ OF aRQNa j y CITY of OROXO Post Office Bo« 66•Crystal Bay. Mmneaoia 55323• MuniapaJ Office® On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka May 3, 1991 Thomas Judd Hassel & Enlow First National Bank Building 1055 East Wayzata Blvd Wayzata^ Mn 55391 Re: Application #1606 - Dig Island Inc., Conditional Use Permit Dear Tom: The City is in receipt of your letter of April 29, 1991 and the updated survey as requested during the conditional use permit review. Staff has enclosed the vacation application. Please note the 1991 meeting and deadline schedule information is listed within the handout information. I have also enclosed a variance application. You should be aware that the City of Orono will require variance approval of the swimming deck/dock to be reconstructed in its present configuration. The decking is located above the 929.4* elevation and the reconstruction would require approval of hardcover and setback variances within the lakeshore protected area (0-75* setback area). 1 cannot remember if I sent you Suesan Pace-Shapiro*s opinion dated January 30, 1991, but I have enclosed it for your review and comment. It would appear that your status as a for- profit organization will have no impact on the standards set forth in our ordinances. The City Attorney*s opinion confirms that it is not necessary that a private club, association or group of unrelated i;.dividuals be a non-profit club or association. Her opinion has raised other considerations regarding membership cf your organization at a maximum 200 member level. The potential of 200 members is based on shared sold to individual’s and not family members. You will note in my original review memo we addressed the fact that total membership must include family members. Based on an average size of a family being 2.5 individuals, a potential total membership at 200 could involve up to 500 individuals. Upon the vacation of public right-of-way. Big Island Inc. will have a total of 5 acres limiting total membership to 100. SUtUNNC a ZONING - 473-7357 AS8IS8INC administration a HNANCE - 473>73S« FAX-47M5I0 PUBUC WORKS - 473-7359 i!.!S sv. a visv »\“ V s "i::?.;"S;. s:js!s.r« "“Sir“. °.' ---iusr.si. !• ■iVV..' ™in February 1989. Vf Class A stock sell their«:4r-vs:?3for the itocK. |6a500.cuss A Share of stock »as »a, ^ r?d /’^’-"."^“"nyToaSf i"\ ^iy •“‘rVason^ tS*. “:K» '^. SS sss;, “sr •»r “; Sr S';.:!:rS=!"lue of the 5**1 P7h^\"*?cn-pcoflt entity., £or-ptoflt rather than non-profit I£ Bi, Vl*;« ^uV.\V’th8 City 8«y>“VV*Vkei;^t?oSorsanlsatlon Is a Plvotai qu ^ certificate of Tax Eie p J‘ni*lS?tli,‘ ltV“.m«s Vs a non-profit corporation. f r ^ 3(c) provide! In *^pyy'!!"in-ii'i- Hilllll Orono Municipal Code Section 10.31. SubO. relevant part: -ttuctures owned or SS'^iiKU . this non-profit parks, and boat! q ^ '*JTh. Vnd aasoclatlona.fltoups# club I would iiSE « -2- • fishing, picnicking, 'this" t^cS?Po»1^" « “ orgsmsstioh. • ^ *-rr^ubldSOntO _ _^^porated as a non-p sentence At «• alBCUsted, the ‘'““®Jy*®fnclude8 "prlvste *hlch gioups, clubs. ^•"'’the'kiSai'Vf® groups thst IS esll your attention to '■°ieJor(l'**'^lot ' area »hich* ’^•ists* "“^ra°e.wSSltements. „«‘«.”*iteeeda WO. the V.t »crts per Xtu bS « t"o*'t'^e“SrtlcW» V^JJ^Oro-'seU ’o’o ib«s. 5So.rJS;coyration^- 2^ 5i”htied »>y f^result^'n Vhe“ us'e^o? Elaia A a hundred shat®® that allSaa 2.5 Although it i® at any onethe site by «0 ,,0 yging the ai ahareholdera a^ individuals who would ® requlren^^nts as tls». bbe »^t 0*^“VtV'bulWable,sws ^ that theUr «rti.%” sV{titn 10;n,^.u>-- .V/el'^^h. ;i5rt*»all*blS tot s^M. 3(C)(1>. -bloh rc?lJia™rTO^r me'S^lon but provided no consent on. A*_ _ _ ,i..T 'is.« K%r'u.“™ fael tto* contact roe. CCS Thoroaa J. Barrett 13126PS -3- * •*• — ‘ - r c r,. t . ’. . • ylJ^^ memorahdum TO;Ja&nne A. MabusthBuilding an<3 Zoning Aflministrat-.or FROn: DATE: RE: 8us80n P8C©-Shapifo jBtiuAiY 30, 1991 Application Ho. 1606, Big island Inc. Permit __ Condltiondl U9C To« h.s « fV/"' conrtloitr'u.r’^erirt ?;”*r WU«”oV, and BH Island-s Articles of Amendme Byla»»a. Qy«atlorB Ptft*^nted 1. was whether Big island The first question you ””inS. is a profit-making corporation. 2.You have also asked pursuant to the 3(c). ct.Mi. of Bla Tr^*"** i"°- . _ - • a nrt:icl68 o£ It it unclear «‘®» inV. la a for-profit or and Bylaws whether Bid I of Amendment and Bylaw*nAh-for-profit corporation. The arcic non-profit corporation. S2 ooV liSlcate that BI9 I«l«» SlS %land Inc. may be a A review of *?4““l^ji5SJd*to limit the personal liability 0 s:-!S iU'! •«•■ndlVlOUSA WWUVA. W. — - - The stated purpose of outdMr"**porM and of reweatlon. w»M'-«^®‘,®«.HirVheidets' of the corporation; the hl^lt ■S?"?at\ol.rioo?iland to facilltste ***»«. affl!** sny^uaiil'^auch a^^oSiiioaSa' a. "She yh^reglXTC require.** CITY OF ORONO P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, NN 473-7357 ZONING PILE #1606 55323 NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Notice: 11/27/90 TO:Thomas A. Judd COPIES TO;Big Island, Inc. 1055 East Wayzata Blvd.P.O. Box 188 Wayzata, MN 55391 Excelsior, MN 55331 TTPB OF APPLICATION: Conditional Use Permit I r- DATS OF ,114:TING: 11/19/90 VOTE 6 For 0 Against Planning Co—tssion reconends the following Tabled for reasons noted below: 1. Prior to the City continuing with the review the City staff shall seek the opinion of the City the legality of the application and to determine and it's proposed use of the property satisfy standards of the RS District. Staff will send opinion as soon as it is submitted to the City. of the application, attorney concerning if Big Island, Inc. the intent and the you a copy of that 2. Please make arrangements to have the Orono Building staff inspect the clubhouse facility to determine if it meets the pertinent standards set torth in Section 10.31. Please contact my office so that I may schedule an Island inspection with the Building staff as soon as possible. 3. The Planning Commission also called attention to the possible need for a separate conditional use permit for overnight camping. As the code under day use recreation area Iffefers to occassional overnight camping, please specify how often the clubhouse structure is used for overnight purposes as it may qualify under occassional use. 4. Updated survey confirming dry buildable area above the 929.4 elevation. Area must also exclude designated wetlands within the subject properties. 5. Application information roust provide total membership including family members. In the rescheduling of your application before the Planning Commission, staff would strongly suggest that you review all pertinent sections of the RS District code and to submit an addendum that responds to the City's concerns, i.e. telephone service, emergency preparedness (procedure/plan for emergencies), garbage removal, etc. As already noted by the Planning Commission, the legal combination of the parcels would be required as a condition of the approval of the conditional use permit. I *• I.I-iV-- I I >; ■ It it' It:: t. 'h ±-y\ ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 19, 1990 ZONING FILE #1606-BIG ISLAND, INC. CONTINUED j The Planning Commission agreed as a whoxe tr.at ir v/ould like to see this application approved, provid’d all aspects of safety, legal liability, etc. can be properly addressed. Ms, Deborah Page, a representative or the Erickson s, = of land adjacent to the subject property, stated tnat sne had sent a letter to the Planning Commission members expressing her client's concerns. She said, "If City Staff works with Big Island, Inc., I believe that my client's concerns wUl be addressed." Cohen suggested that Ms. Page may wish to also work with City Stfliff Sind Big Islands Inc. There were no further comments from the public and the Public: Hearing was continued. It was moved by Cohen, application #1606, Big Island, Motion carried. seconded by Moos, to table Inc. Motion, Ayes-6. Na/s-0. REBBRS CONSTRUCTION - 2008 SUGARWOODS DRIVE REQUEST TO ENCROACH FRONT/STREET SETBACK AREA Mr. Sid Rebers, Mr. Stephen Pflaum, Mr. and Mr. Bob Kost were present. Rabers' attorney. Mr. Pflaum began by providing a history of the events that h»d taken place to detern.ine how these requests be addressed by the City, Planning Commission and Council. He then addressed the specific request before the* Planning Commission this evening. He said, "This house meets the design criteria of the Sugarwoods Comprehensive Plan. The house is alx but completed and the owners are due to move in shortly. property owners do not want to have the turn-around located in the front yard, adjacent to the house. They v/ould prefer it to be on the other side. It is my understanding that the square footage of the drivev/ay and turn-around would be less than the driveway approved with the building permit. However, the revised proposal does encroach into the 50' front street setback area. This is the largest lot in the subdivision. The total construction on this lot is substantially less than what is allowed The property owners have consumed everything and are now asking for more space. This is a design and aesthetic issue with the homeowner. In the future, to avoid this situation from occurring after the house is constructed, v/e would ask the builders to work with Staff so that these situations may be brought before the Planning commission before the building permit is issued We will probably be coming before you with a majority of the lots in thi subdivision. Vie are also considering an abbreviated procedure - 17 - . ... .... V V.: if-' ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEET VEMBER 19, 1990 ZONING FILE #1606-BIG ISLAND, INC. CONTINlitD facilities." Mr. Judd replied, "There is a plumbing in the facility on Lot One. an outhouse." septic system and indoor On the other lot, there is Bellows asked what standards would apply to allow the house to be used in this manner. Mabusth noted all pertinent standards of the ordinance, similar to the type of reviev; completed for Big Island Veteran's Camp. Bellows stated that she would like the City Attorney s opinion on the organization, aid the City's liability for the residential structure being used in this manner.' Mabusth stated that the City Attorney's opinion would be obtained. Mr. Judd advised that the structure is used primarily as a shelter in the event of inclement weather. He said, Most of the visitors to this site come in open boats and run-abouts. The house is t.he only shelter on the island. From ti.me to time people stay overnight in the facility if they make appropriate reservations and pay a deposit." Bellows asked how that is policed. She said, "VJe were very careful in requiring certain criteria for Veteran's Camp. I see no such criteria here, even though this is a similar use." CohP*' said, "Mr. Judd just referred to making reservations and taking deposits. That sounds like a business." Mr. Judd explained, "That is merely prudent management of the facility. We want to make sure that only one couple is staying there overnight and they are responsible for the care and maintenance of the facility. The security deposit is used to pay for utilities and insurance." Kelley asked, "If all other criteria is met, would the Planning Commission recommend approval of this use for the property. The City is trying to encourage this type of use for Big Island. From my point of view, I would like to see something like this happen out there- Tne question is what needs to be done and what criteria must be met to accomplish that. I would recommend that Staff work with the applicant." Cohen recommended that the corporation do whatever necessary to obtain a non-profit designation. - 16 - r I yf- V' 4^ '1: i - •' iy-th''hr-(i. ’■■■ - K Wi m hi ■-•I Jr.U; £■■ W ORONO PLAMNIMG COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 19, 1990 .ONING FILE 'ff.e rofocize to the Plannin, Co^tssiL l" «as t,y underztandinc that the necessary permits were to be obtained and had assumed that had been accompiisned. Kelley said, -The issue is whether or not there are five acres " M Judd explained, "It was our understanding, from a 1986 survey, that 'we had at least five acres. Accorcing ^o the ^urveJor the survey was drawn taking into consideration the proper elevations for wetlands. However, I have been unable to confirm that." Kelley said, "If we assume that the parcel is five acres, ^hsn All oth6r critsriA is met. Hanson questioned whether the non-profit organization aspect is a serious issue. Mr. Judd stated that his group has not filed the appropriate documents to obtain a non-profit organization designation. Hanson asked if it would pose a problem if the group were Asked to do that. Mr. Judd replied, "We would meet the qualifications and would do that if necessary. However, it is a tedious process. Bellows stated that it is difficult to classify this use. Hanson said, "I am asking for che non-profit designation to assure that this is not a real estate investment. Mr Judd replied, "It is not a real estate investment. We t*ll oeoDle coming in, if that is their intention, that this will 1-heir needs and will disappoint them and that they are Thl peo^e revolved hive a definite .dea about how SSu proplriy fa*/o be used. It is purely recreational. If we w»* an asiLiation. rather than a corporation, it ‘''’“I'l be fkM.saarv to neet. The corporation was a vehicle to serve thi "th multiple^ owners. we ^ needed to acquire financing in order to purchase the property. Bellows ashed Mabusth to elaborate on the uno of the Structure. Mr. Judd explained. "The structure was originally built as a singls-family, seasonal residence." Rellowa said, "That is what concerns me about its use for so many pe^pte Th^ve questions about liability, fire and toilet - 15 - I I I f ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 19, 1990 A. W •.an average 1akeshore W • ZONING FILE #1605-LINDSTROM CONTINUED application showing only the need setback Variance, I would consiaer tha The Planning Commission agreed with Kelley. Bellows added that sit^a may hal® difficulty approving evan the second story addition. There were no public comments regarding this application and the Public: Hearing was continued. It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Johnson, to table application #1605. Motion, Ayes-5, Nays-0, Cohen abstaine . Motion carried. #1606 BIG ISLAND, INC. - bIG ISLAND RECORD LOTS 12 * 19 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 8:50 P.M. TO 9:05 P.M. Mr. Thomas Judd was present. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mabusth provided a brief summary of her November 14, 1990 memo. Kelley asked how this u.se varied from that of the Power Squadron. Mabusth replied, "The question is more the use proposed for Deering Island. That was denied because it was proposed by a 'for profit' organization. It is supposed to be non-profit.'* Mr. Judd referred to a letter he had written in January. 1985 settinq out the use and ownership information. He sai , i|«Icariy, « ar. comprised of a group of people, mostly from tha Excelsior area, who wished to and Big Island for private use, but could not afford to live ^ t*ie lake. This group came together informally, at first, to t^y S form an organ^zat'lon to purchase some property. We bought oarcel Tv/o and it was determined that the manner in whi«-h mild to use it long term, would not comply. We then b,,gan neaotiatinq to purchase Lot One, and were successful in doing so. W«^ had survey information indicating that the combined lots exceeded five acres. T.he group consists of approximately 40 families that a.re owners. The property is used as a rSreitional, day use primarily, winh some overnight camping. The average number of boats at the docks is 00 four ' highest use tha*- I have seen may have approach..d 100 people. do not have a 'for profit' organization. We usually Operate loss and receive subsidies from the owners for - 14 - i. I'- I- I i:-,?t-.f:'. " I % II"; ft I;:I I & I? ^ fc’.S■■f. 1 '-I>v ^'5! I'iIf fi?P =m¥'- r.^.-i -A, t?ii'r- a . r'ii , II. ■■fef ^ r- .fc'../ >.. li EXH IIT A Barbara A. Peterson. Mayor 1261 Arbor Street P.O. Box 164 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Ccuncfl Members Edward Callahan 2545 North Shore Drive P.O. Box 72 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 J. Diann Goetten 1385 Fox Street Wayzata, MN 55391 Gabriel Jabbour 985 Tonkawa Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Maty Butler 3145 Casco Circle Wayzata, MN 55391 Planning Commission Charles Kelley, Chairman 2720 White Oak Circle Long Lake, MN 55356 Maureen S. Bellows, Vice-Chairman 265 S. Brown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Ms. Sara Moos 2160 Webber Hills Road Wayzata, MN 55391 If >. Mr. Charles Schroeder 1925 West Farm Road Long Lake, MN .'5356 Mr. Edward M. Cohen 519 N. Ferndaie Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Mr. Jeffrey Johnson 3825 Cherry Avenue Mound, MN 55364 Ms. Candace Rowiette 3775 Bayside Road Long Lake, MN 55356 k: r LINDQUIST & VENNUM Mcpbers of the Orono Planning Commission and Cirv- Council Members July lO;* 1991 Page 2 the City of Orono. I would encourage the City to include this requiicment as an additional condition to the permit. Based upon the information provided to me, it is difficult to confirm the number of slips approved for the dock on the property. I would request that the condition (No. 3) regarding the dock specifically state that a dock license for more than 15 slips will not be permitted under the terms of the Conditional Use Permit. The remaining concern addressed by my clients was with regard to the fire rings and barbecue pits in the area. Because the property will not be continuously occupied (as in a residential setting), the possibility of fire is even more enhanced on the island. I would recommend that the City also include an additional condition of the Conditional Use Permit regarding the placement of fire extinguishers near the fire rings and barbecue pits for safety purposes. If I can answer any questions any of you may have in this regard, please give me a call. Unfortunately, I will not be able to attend the Planning Commission meeting next Monday evening. Accordingly, I would hope that this letter would set forth my clients concerns in this regard. Very truly yours, LINBQUIST & VENNUM ebra K. Pa DKP;ch cc:Jeanne Mabusth Michael Gaffi-on Thomas A. Judd I VW ... .^rl LINDQUIST & VENNUM 43O0VS0otPm 80SqumEi»«xSyrr^rrmn ----------------- TajF»o«: 612^1 ^ 1 Plot 6l2<J71-3Z7r €oSMoirMB440i aOMTS^OOO AnoMvtArUiw ■?/ i-i > % - n- i:? 5^- p', D6BRAICPAGE JUU 1 5 1931- July 11. 1991 To:Members of Orono Planning Commission and City Council Members Identified on Exhibit A attached Re: Conditional Use Permit for Big Island. Inc. Ladies and Gentlemen: This office represents Tristin O. Erickson, Gerald A. Erickson, Jr. and Arthur T. Erickson II in connection with their ownership of approximately 41 acres located on Big Island. The property which the Ericksons own is immediately adjacent to property owned by Big Island, Inc., a Minnesota corporation. In November of last year, I wrote to each of you and attended a meeting cf the Orono Planning Commission with regard to an application for a Day-Use Recreation Area permit on behalf of Big Island, Inc. At the Planning Commission meeting, the application was postponed until the City staff could obtain additional information and satisfy various concerns raised by the Planning Commission. At that time, the Planning Commission also requested that the staff include me in any work on this matter to address the concerns of my clients. Unfortunately, I was not apprised of any action in this regard. The first notice I received of any matter relating to Big Island was included in my mail on Wednesday, July 10th. I have now learned that various applications and matters have been addressed by the applicant and the City staff since the November Planning Com lission meeting. If I had had the chance to participate in the discussions, I would not be obligated to bring a last- minute request to you re^^arding the application. Unfortunately, Jeanne Mabusth is out of the office for the remainder of this week. Accordingly, I hope that this letter will clarify the concerns of my clients regarding the Day-Use Recreation Area permit for Big Island, Inc. I have discussed this matter with my clients who are pleased that the City has addressed some of the issues raised in November of last year. As you may recall, my clients’ major concern involved the density and use cf the island. I would note that in the material provided to roe, Thomas Judd, attorney for Big Island, Inc., offered to add as an additional condition to the Conditional Use Permit that no change would be made in the membership provision of the Bylaws of Big Island, Inc. until notice had been provided to H EXHIBIT A James R. Grabek, Mayor 1335 South Brown Road Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Council Memb ers Edvard Callahan 2545 North Shore Drive P. 0. Box 72 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 J. Diane Goetten 1385 Fox Street Wayzata, MN 55391 Alls' R. Nettles 1940 snoreline Drive Nayzata, MN 55391 Barbara A. Peterson 1251 Arbor Street P. O. Box 164 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Planning Commission Charles Kelly 2720 White Oak Circle Long Lake, MN 55356 Maureen S. Bellows 265 South Brown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Sara Moos 2160 Webber Hills Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Jim Hanson 884 D*tkota Avenue Long Lake 55356 Edvard M. 519 North . .«ale Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Jeffrey Johnson 3825 Cherry Avenue Mound, MN 55364 Candace Rowlette 3775 Bayside Road Long Lake, MN 55356 _ li ■r f. .i: p, LINDOUIST & VENNUM H Orono Planning Commission and City Council Members November 12, 1990 Page 3 the granting of a Day-Use Recreation Area Conditional Use Permit. 4.Safety. As you know, the Power Squadron operates a motor boat facility across the channel from the proposed Big Island, Inc. facility. The Power Squadron use, when combined with the potential significant boat use proposed by Big Island, Inc., may well be beyond the capacity of the Big Island area. Such an overcrowding creates a greater safety risk around the island. Due to the safety risks caused by the very close proximity to the Minnetonka Power Squadron property, the Ericksons object to the granting of a conditional use permit to Big Island, Inc. 5.Open Fires. If the City considers granting the Conditional Use Permit, my clients specifically request that open fires be prohibited from the area. Specifically, the Ericksons are concerned about a large number of individuals using the property without a direct property ownership interest. The significant risk of many unsupervised individuals creates a most- significant fire hazard to the island. On the basis cf the above specific objections, the Ericksons request that City of Orono deny the Conditional Use Permit request for Big Island, Inc. If I can provide you with further information, pleat ^./e me a call. Very truly yours, DKP:ch ^ V.-. LINDQUIST & VENNUM Orono Planning Conmission and City Council Menbers November 12, 1990 Page 2 2. 3. limited membership to 60 shareholders, the number of individual users could be approximately 130. Obviously, the site is not large enough to sustain either 180 or 600 individual users. Moreover, Orono Ordinance § 10.31, Subd. C indicates that a Day-Use Recreation Area Conditional Use Permit shall be granted only if five acres of dry buildable land area is available to sustain 100 users. If more than 100 individuals may use the property, the ordinance requires a ratio of one acre per every twenty users. While we are unaware of the precise acreage of this subject parcel, Mike Gaffron indicated that the site probably does not equal, and in any event, does not exceed, five dry buildable land acres. Given this fact, Big Island, Inc.'s current and potential membership far exceeds the lawful number of users for the site. Such an overuse of the property will obviously result in increased noise and destruction of resources. Solely on the basis of the overcrowding of the subject property, the Ericksons strenuously object to the granting of the Conditional Use Permit. Environment. Two hundred family unit members would likely result in potentially 200 boats for the property. The sixty family members current on record will immediately result in at least 60 boats. The shoreline area proposed for use by Big Island, Inc. cannot sustain docks or boat slips for 60 or 200 boats. Even if the area were sufficient in size to accommodate a large number of boats, significant docking and the resulting heavy boat traffic would have a severe impact upon the remaining ecological system of Big Island. On the basis of this environmental concern, my clients object to the granting of the Conditional Use Permit. Sewage Facilities. Orono Ordinances require sufficient on-site sewage treatment facilities. My clients are sure that, as Planning Commission and Council Members, you will carefully review the proposed plan to ensure that it can satisfactorily sustain the large number of Individual users which Big Island, Inc. proposes. As you know, sewer systems on the island have been problematic. The Ericksons' concern is to eliminate any further destruction of the island, its underground water system, and the surrounding lake area due to potential overuse of an inadequate sewer system. Due to these obvious sewer problems, my clients object to U»U*CSB V. ACHMAN OiBAtO c. MAONUBON KO«PABO M.OLKNMON MCkVIM l.OBKfiBTClN •OBBBt j. BMCBAW ■BBACL C. NBAWm BUOCliC HCArtN<J yAMKS P.MAATINCAU ftie^AlID J. rtTXOCBAcO wOMM A. rpAACBT wiLUAM c. rom JOHN J. COMMCLUT ^Cf»BPU> 9. BXBOrACK 0A¥1D M.CBBCOO^^ JOMK H.BTBOrMWAM OAVie O.MCWMACL «U|BTIB A.01ICBNtBT fiOBBWT V. ATMOBC PATBICH PKIANCY BOMAVO B. VAMTINC ^OMN •.BMNBTOW tAUBAMCK B.BMU.OOCM •MONAB M.OABBCTT 111 OABYLC V. UBHOYr PAYIO J. PAVCMBOBT MABB B.JOMMBON B iCMAAO a . AMtMUtMB WALTCB BACHMAN THOMAS C. rABCL ^Cr*BCT • SCHMIDT TIMOTHT M. butlcb BOBCBT a MiTCHCLL.^A j. MiCHACt 3AOT j- HCViN COSttCT •OBCBT J. MAATMAN JOSCBM O. KOHI.BM BICHABO O M«MCtL DONALD C. SWCNSON BB u CK a . BON jOUB JAMCS B. M«CABTHr • TCVCN J. JOHNSON BICHABO IHBIO CABOL T. BICOCB BOOCBICR i.MACBCNZtC WILLIAM C. fLfNN JAMCS w. BcgrcB MiCHACL S.MABO JLICS THOMAS O. LOVCTT IV Thomas C. OLC nn ON JOHN B. HOUSTON OCNNIS M.O'MALLCT KQWABO J.WCaCBSOM LINDQUIST & VENNUM S200 IDS CCNTEB MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55*02-2205 TELEPHONE i«i2l 37I-32M TAX; I6I2I 37I-32C7 :ABLE. LINLAW MlNNe40C;.!S wayza Ta orricE 7AO EAST uAA£ STBCE* WAYZATA. MINNESOTA 3S39l WPITCP‘5 OiPECT DIAL NUMBEP (612) 371-3523 7.4. .V f-' November 12, 1990 DAMiCC J SmCBAM DAVID A AL wOCTCB TCBBCNCC J rLCMINO BOcr CNOH BICHABO T OSYLUNO OCSOBA m M BCOAN mab Tin • BOSCNS aum CDNOB C BOSCNSTCIN BOSANNC *4«riBTM orsBA A. iEQTb . miCH a CL dOLATSON jOCL H CBESN x DAVID u ^aitlstc ;^ C na B c CS I^^BtAVCJi. 4,^ OAVtO L. SASS^B<g2^^ DAVIO A OONBA JONATHAN M. BYC MABY P. h«conmcll SA..I.Y S.OBOSSMAN timotmv B. BACB timothy S. M«INTCC JOSCPM A. THOMSON ANN I ELIZABETH O.MMIM SALLT BHirUpip^J AAT hAHINC N.^ELMB hall ACE O. hila E CHABLCS P MOOBSE PAYl JO POPAHL LUAC N. TCBMAAB AABEM L. SCHBEIBCP C ha B lCS j. LLOvO vAMES A lOOOEN SUSAN B. HONAME tEB wON G. tpan GSB u O TIMOTNY y. wono BANDT O. SULLICASON BAB a M OUPP HALVOB50N Sanoba aim -5 .1 • “TISBEBT E. YUNHElM ANSIS V. VI ASNINS LAUPA C. OALT CDUNBCX LCONABO E. LlNOOUlfT lAwL THOMAS VENNUM To: Members of Orono Planning Comirlssion and City Council Members Identified on Exhibit A attached Re: Big Island Development Ladies and Gentlemen: This office represents Tristin O. Erickson, Gerald A. Erickson, Jr. and Arthur T. Erickson II in connection with their ownership of approximately 41 acres located on Big Island. The property which the Ericksons own is immediately adjacent to property owned by Big Island, Inc., a Minnesota corporation. Mike Gaffron has informed me that Big Island, Inc. has applied for a Day-Use Recreation Area Conditional Use Permit for the use of its property on the island. Undoubtedly, the Erickson property is the largest single tract of privately-jwned property near the proposed Day-Use Recreation Area. Because my clients are unable to attend the Orono Planning Commission meeting scheduled for November 19, 1990, this letter sets forth their position regarding this proposed Conditional Use Permit. Please be advised that my clients object to the City's grant of a Conditional Use Permit for a Day-Use Recreation Area to Big Island, Inc. The reasons for this objection are as follows: 1.Density. Big Island, Inc.'s Articles of Incorporation indicate 200 potential shareholders. Presumably, a shareholder may a family unit, comprising more than one Individual user. Accordingly, the potential users of the subject premises could, at any time, include 200 families. While it is difficult to estimate how many individual users may be part of any family, it is safe to estimate at least three individual users in any one family. If this were the case, this site would be required to sustain a minimum of 600 people at any one time. Mike Gaffron informed me that the Conditional Use Permit application listed only 60 member families. Even if the Big Island, Inc. Articles of Incorporated .'H. F ir •i ^ *:• -w D. ANNUAL LICENSE FEE - ALL APPLICATIONS Joint Use Dock License Application fee according to the current City Pee Schedule INITIAL APPLICATION PEE RENEWAL JOINT USE FEE, per year PLUS SLIP PEE for each permanent moorage slip, lift, dry stack, or buoy slips 0 $2.00 each i5 TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION $ • CO $ _ _ _ 30 cc LATE FEE - Renewals Applications for renewal of licenses shall be "°^^^^®5ccept February 1 of the license year. Ci^ sh^l not renewal ^license applications receiv^ af^ Ma^ 1 unj^ss - - application is accompanied ^ a late f^ of ^25.00. REVIEW PROCEDURE When a complete application is received, the application will be Jll“.weTby the City Council and, in the case of new or unusual applicaitons, also by the Planning Commission Committee. The Council will pass upon the application afte cooiplete review. THE SUBJECT DOCK MAY BE INSTALLED AND/OR OPENED F0i\ USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OP THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to rev ew Joint Use Dock License Application, and agrees and City of Orono and the City's employees and agents Jo the property at any reasonable time to perform safety and co compliance Inspectior^^ Signed Date 6/2^ ho Page 5 of 5 u EROSION a:id sedimentation control 16. Shoreline is protected by (chec's applicable itenis): X 5tone rip rap. (partial) vDOd seawall.netal seawall.concrete seawall. grass and vegetation only, other (specij./) 17. Depth of water at shoreline is t; at 50 . out is at4-txjx J 10' at 100 ft. out is 20 ft #1 ' * \ TT '•n REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application: A. DOCK PLAN - ALL APPLICATIONS B. I' A dock plan, drawn to scale, showing the shoreline width of this property, the property lines and the location, layout and dimensions of all docks, slips and buoys. If off-street parking, dry storage or other on-land functions are intended, these also should be shown on the plan. UNINCORPORATED GROUPS OR ASSOCIATIONS 1. list of the names and mailing addresses of all members and/or slip users. 2.A certified copy of the by-laws or agreement for joint use. Note: This copy is not required if the applicant i.nitials and certifies the following statement: “This is a renev»al application and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same by-laws or agreement originally made in _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (state year) and on file with the City." Applicant's initials C. INCORPORATED CLUBS OR ASSOCIATIONS 1. A list of the names, mailing addresses and titles of all corporation officers. 2.A statement as to the total number of members in the club or association. 40 members. 3.A certified copy of the articles of incorporation and by-laws of the corporation dote: These copies are not required if the applicant initials and certifies the following statement: "This is a renewal application and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same articles of incorporation and/or by-laws as originally made or last amended in _ _ _ _ _ _ _(state year) and on file with the City." Applicant's initials President:Pat Hanily 2660 Orchard Lane Excelsior, 55331 Secretary;Norm Larson 27750 Woodside Road Excelsior, MN 55331 Treasurer:Alan Tollefson 2931 Washta Bay Road Excelsior, MN 55331 Vice Pres.: Jean Meuller 401 Lafayette Excelsior, MN 55331 Page 4 of 5 •I.! • , r * •• f rV uy ■aV' :.*«■ ■ t;"' -rV r. I W',> Insurance Coverage - The Jointly used dock is Insured by one ofjihe fo^vlng: # / ^ \ property ovner's homeovner's polica*^- j ■ — y^■y. itX separate group/association owned p#]/cy.^« . u ,, ----(Note: Each member is required to furnish certificate of insurance to dock at list the following infonnation: facility.) name of insured Big Island, Inc. name of Insurance carrier Western World Insurance Co. name of insurance agency Insurance jnsulting Services policy no. GL\ 314475 ____.effective date of coverage 6/29/90 (1 vr. ---------------------- coverage amount of coverage; Public liability, per person, per occurence $^QQ,QQQ,QQ_. Plus Excess fc^llc liability, per occurence $ 500,000.00 Security and policing of the Jointly used dock and property is provided by (check applicable items): fencing. X__ security lighting. property owner's presence, contract security ser>/ice. other (specify) ____________________ 130CK RMATION 11. List Dock Use Area Specifications: Width of shoreline; l,50Qt f-* Length of main doc.t from shore; 125 Dock setbacks from aide property lines at shore; 500^*______ ft. and SOQt 12* Dock Construction (check applicable items): ft. ft. X aeasonal dock (relocated or replaced each year). permanent piling with seasonal deck. _ permanent piling and decking. wooden decking. _ _ metal decking. 13. List Dock Accessories: Rundber of fire extinguishers available at the dock Boats required to have Number of life preservers available at the dock Boats required to have 14. Llat number of sUpe in each categoir^("slips" includes boat lifts): each dock ^ Transient (day use only) slips 15 Permanent moorage slips Dxy storage (rack) slips tetai^ 0 ■^J Transient (day use) off-shore buoys Permanent moorage off-shore buoys Maximum number of boats at dock 15 ri 15. List nvimber of off-street parking spaces available for users of the Jolntjwe dock. Perking, if provided must not be separated from the dock by any p\Jbllc roed. 0 ___spaces. V. i' I h- ;■■'•■ H J V t' 1: 1*:r ^fe•I- ■ L : ‘I k. 5. 6. f • 8. Association is (check anolicable iteT^); 7 7 unincorpcrated hor.eovner's group o 1 incorporated Hoirecwner's Associai/ioV.. uninco mo rated club or recreetion group X incorporated elub or recreation group. pyj_QQj_pal Durpose of joint use dock is (cnec.'t appxicaD_e items provide boat mooring and lake access for residential property orovide swlnnning access^ beac.d, or offsr.ore dock. X provide a club or association gathering place for activities Dock is located on (caecK applicable itea): ___cne meaber's pri'/ate property. easement or outlet ovned in coaaon. property leased by the group/assooiatitn. X property owned by the group/association. List Dock location and ovnershi? infortation: street address RL 19, RL Jti _____________ PID # 22-117-23-42-0019 22-117-23-42-0020 • listed oronertv owner(s) Big Island, Inc. Names of abutting lakeshore property owners: Attached Exhibits A & B H'(Name + Address) 1 •,(South/East) : A (Name + Address) > L Names of other affected property owners ; i t K ,♦CFF ATTAIrwn cufeIS_____________________________________________ Name ess) (attach sheet if necessary) I.2 of 5 - - : r.r k-'V' .. hkh).. CITY OF ORONO P.O. BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 473-7357 license year 19 ^j (association) / i -^1 —'-N . ^ V 'O ANNUAL .TDTNT USE DOCK LICENSE APPLICATION Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5-42 Date Form Sent by City Staff Date Application Returned to City^- - - - - - - Pee Recived $__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ By Employee C XT c„K,^-ix,^«inn 2. LICENSE REQUIRED - It is unlawful for any l^roiroMssocS o£ persons or .ore than two .n nu^er, whether incorporated or not) to engage or participate in...joint us ”o£ any Is. isLre property) without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. OTV&CP rnMPTiETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY MARCH ] OF THE LICENSE YEAR. association INFORMATION 1. Association title or name (if any) land, Inc.---------------------- 2. La)ce )1inneton)<a _________Bay Southeast tip of Mahoivata Island 3, Person responsible for this application: Name Thomas A. Judd___________________Phone . 473-4402 Mailing Suite 219 First National Bank Bldg., 1055 East Wayzata Elyd. Relationship to ag^nriation Member, Attorney------------------------------------------- Page 1 of 5 is Vi f: ■ft i Qo ARTICLE IX. Order cf Business 9.1 The order of business for rerjulur meetings of the board of directors shall be as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Roll Call. Reading of minutes of shareholders or directors' meetings. Reports of officers. Reports of committees. Unfinished business. New business. Election and appointment of committees. Adjournment. The same order of business so far as applicable, shall obtain in shareholder's meetings, except that election of pro posed shareholders shall come under the head of Election and appointment of committees. ARTICLE X. Amendments 10.1 These bylaws may be modified, altered or amended by 75% vote of the quorum present at the annual meeting of the corp oration, or at an adjourned session thereof, or a :~.;<ecial meeting called for that purpose, provided that advano-. notices of any proposed modification, alteration or amendment be mailed to shareholders. Adopted February 23, 1989 by unanimous vote of the share holders present. Je^^Mueller, Secretary I4r 1 ):/ right at any time within forty-five days after receiving official notice of his or her fine or suspension, to require the Secretary to call a special meeting of the shareholders to consider the matter. At such meeting a 75% vote of those present shall decide whether the decision of the board of directors shall remain or be set aside or revised. 8.2 Indemnity of Officers and Directors. To the full extent permitted by Minnesota Statutes, as amended from time to tine, or by other provisions of law, each person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, wherever brought, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that he or she is or was a director or an officer of the corporation, or he or she is or was serving at the specific request of the board of directors of the corporation as a director or an oUicer, shall be indemnified ./ the corporation against expenses, in'~’uding attorney's fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with such action, suit or proceeding. The indemnification provided by this section shall continue as to a director or officer and to the heirs of such director or officer even if such person is not a director or officer at the time the claim is made and shall apply to actions taken by the director or officer as director or officer before this section was adopted. s \ I n ARTICLE VII. Finances 7.1 Limit of Indebtedness. The board of ^..rectors shall not incui. any indebtedness or expense on the part of the corporation in an amount in excess of $10,000.00 without the prior approval of a 75 majority vote of the shareholders. 7,2 Signatures on Checks. All checks in excess of $50.00 shall require the signatures of any two of the Treasurer or the President or the Accountant. 7,3, Annual Report. The board of directors shall at the annual meeting present to the shareholders a report of the con dition of the corporation and its property, a condensed account of the financial transactions of the past year, a financial budget for the ensuing year, and offer suggestions for the iielfare and improvement of the corporation. Said reports shall be kept on file in the archives of the corporation and shall be siiisject to the inspection of any shareholder. ARTICLE XIII. Miscellaneous 8.1 Penalties. The board of directors may impose a fine or suspend the privileges of any shareholder as outlined in paragraphs 2.3 and 2.13. It may do this only after notice in i^iflting is sent to the shareholder in advance of a meeting of the board of directors and only upon allowing the shareholder to attend such meeting and only upon an 80% majority vote of those directors present at such meeting. The grounds for such fine or suspension shall be any cause deemed sufficient to the board of directors. Any shareholder so fined or suspended shall have the l i - u. ■ir ||5,f i.-; I- !■-n' I'V I- py pf. yfy F^;v‘- V’-.. m ■ R?i.' l‘^- j.'f':' . |■■■ ¥ I, rJ/ * r'i\ ti /i t V’- ■V s lr< f / -^ JLL f; ?: .4^ ^ • Vr ^ft... 6.2 Appointment. The President at the first meeting of the board of directors held after the annual meeting shall appoint the following standing committees for the ensuing year. The chairperson of all standing committees shall be appointed by the board of directors. Rules and Conduct. Docks and Grounds. Membership. Social. Each of said committees shall consist of at least three shareholders. 6.3 Ex-Officio Member. The President shall be ex-officio member of each of said committees, and shall only vote to break a tie. 6.4 Other Committees. The board of directors shall have the power from time to time to appoint such committees as it may deem expedient and necessary, and to delegate to such committees such duties and powers as may be found necessary for the proper conduct of the affairs of the corporation, and the board of directors may appoint on such committees any shareholder of the corporation. 6.5 Expenses. All proposed expenditures by the various committees shall be submitted for approval to the board of directors. Expenses incurred shall be submitted to the Treasurer for payment or reimbursement. / f TT 77 *.» 4i ' ‘W majority of the shareholders. In the event less than all of said ^3 sold or condemned, then the shareholders shall decide whether or not to continue to operate the corporation or to dissolve pursuant to a 75% majority vote of the shareholders. ARTICLE V. Duties and Privileges of Shareholders 5,1 Certificate of Boat Insurance. Each shareholder who owns a boat shall provide to the Secretary of the corporation a current certificate of liability insurance applicable to that boat in a form and amount required by the board of directors. 5.2 Guests and Reservations.Shareholders the corporation may invite guests to the realty of the corporation. Guests must be accompanied by a shareholder. Invitations of groups of twenty or more guests must be in accordance with the notice requirements to ^11 shareholders as established by the corporation. Similarly, reservations of any part of the realty must be in accordance with the rules as established by the corporation 5,3 Contribution of Labor. Each shareholder is required to put in ten hours of work per year involving maintenance or improvement of grounds and buildings. If a shareholder does not put in the requisite of work, he or she will be charged $10.00 per hour for hours not completed as determined by the Docks and Grounds Committee, and this will appear on the June statement. ARTICLE VI. Committees 6.1 General. All committees shall serve at the direction of and shall report to the board of directors. —A - C. # \ indebtedness of any shareholder reifiWin un^paid a ^wKod . vj .A of sixty days, the ownership of the shares of such shareholder may be terminated by the board of directors. Such termination must be made in writing to the shareholder and must be by a 75% majority vote of the board of directors. However, upon approval by a 75% majority vote of the board of directors, such termin ation may be rescinded if all dues and indebtedness is paid in full by the shareholder and all of the monies paid by the corp oration for the purchase price of his or her share is returned to the corporation within ninety days after the date of such writing. 3.3 Statements. Bills incurred by the shareholder or his or her guests, will be rendered to the shareholde’' on the last of each month and shall become immediately payable. ARTICLE IV. Dissolution 4.1 In the event the realty of the corporation is sold or condemned, the corporation shall dissolve and all outstanding shares shall be purchased by the corporation for an amount equal to the net proceeds of the sale or condemnation after all expenses and costs of the sale or condemnation are deducted and all outstanding liabilities of t’ . corporation are paid, divided by the number of outstanding shares of the corporation.The corporation shall have the right to reduce the amount due to any shareholder upon the sale of said corporation by any amount of indebtedness owed by the shareholder to the corporation The corporation shall only sell the realty upon approval by a 75% i/- i- k f ^rhH-k.Vf' kw -rt>-r f’ i*r-'rr-^v, h‘ i: -y i&V'"' * t \ •» 4/r/ ,.rs' O its original purchase price. Notwithstanding any provision of this paragraph to the contrary, a Class B share can be given and transferred to a child of a Class B shareholder or to a child of his or her spouse. Such transfer shall only be made through the t ion, and the child shall be subject to the approval process as discussed in paragraph 2.4 above; however, no purchase price shall be paid inasmuch as a purchase price was previously paid when such Class B share was purchased from the corporation. A Class B share so transferred shall become a Class A share, subject to dues, assessments, and privileges incident to Class A shares* Such transfer shall not be subject to the lottery described above* Notwithstanding any provision of this paragraph to the contrary, the corporation shall be obligated to purchase ^11 Class B shares owned by a Class A shareholder, if the Class A share of that shareholder is also resigned or terminated as provided in paragraphs 2*7, 2.8 and 2.10 above or if the Class A share of that shareholder is sold to the corporation in the event of the death of such shareholder as provided in paragraphs 2.9 and 2*10 above* ARTICLE III. Dues 3*1 Dues * Dues sha^l be used as directed by the board of directors* All dues are payable on the first day of December, March, June and September of each year* There shall be a late fee for dues which are more than 30 days late. 3»2 Indebtedness. Notwithstand. i •. any provision of paragraph 2*8 to the contrary, when the dues or other financial 1 ‘Vi A. ^ h- ' . f* f L'i. ■' I D P'- ^k t- I ’ K:- I* ji i a ' •:-V 'N of a Class A share. No Class D share can he so sold and pur = chased until a prospective t^urchaser of a Class A share is approved in the manner set forth in paragraph 2.4 above, and such prospective purchaser is ready, willing, and able to purchase a Class A share from the corporation. In the event the precon ditions of this paragraph are met, the corporation shall be obli gated to purchase the Class B share. Such sale and purchase of a Class B share shall be in a priority determined by earliest purchase date, or in the case of equivalent purchase dates, to be determined by lottery to be held prior to each such sale and purchase, with all Class B shares purchased on that date desiring to be sold at that time being given an equal chance per share. All Class B shares purchased prior to dull 1, 1988 are considered as purchased on an equivalent purchase date. However, where such prospective Class A shareholder designates in writing to the Secretary the Class B shareholder who has sponsored him or her for approval in paragraph 2.4 above, that sponsor shall be able to sell his or her Class B r>hare and thus by-pass the lottery. Such sale and purchase price shall be the price as established by the corporation. However, the sale and purchase prices of Class B shares to be paid to the shareholder by the corpotation through January 1, 1990 and until and unless the corporation shall thereafter change such price, are the same sale and purchase prices of Class A shares set forth under paragraph 2.5 above, except in case of resignation, termination or death, in which case the Class B share shall be purchased from the shareholder at I- r-.; III re’ \ *■. I ■ , •P. f-’. I? Tt Class B Shares r'fc._5>' j *' I o 2.12 Ownership. Only Class A shareholders shall be entitled to own Class B shares. The maximum of Class B shares that can be owned by any one Class A shareholder is five. 2,13 Privileges. The privileges of Class B shareholders shall be the same as those of Class A shareholders. However a Class B share cannot vote on the issue of liquidation. Class B shares are exempt from dues and assessments. 2.14 Sale To and Purchase By Shaieholder. The sale and piijr^hase price of a Class B share to a prospective Class B shareholder shall be the same or greater than the sale and purchase price of any existing Class B share and shall established by the corporation. 2.15 Stock Certificate. Upon payment in full to the corporation of the purchase price of said Class B share, such Class B shareholder shall be issued a Class B stock certificate representing his or her share Class B stock the corporation Said share shall not be pledged, used as collateral, encumbered, transferred, or assigned in any way or manner other than being transferred back to the corporation. 2,16 Sale To and Purchase By Corporation. A Class B share can only be sold to and purchased by the corporation. Such sale and purchase can only be made when the total of outstanding Class A and Class B shares equals or exceeds fifty-five. Upon such sale and purchase, the corporation shall retire such Class B share and shall sell a Class A share to a prospective purchaser p-> u' f-. V' * r< ,'r '•‘V it<:(p,! Kt If:??4 ■w:w i^‘y ^.,rv I r'fe- p ‘ t y 1 f,. ■V purchaser is ready, willing, and able to purchase a Class A share from the corporation, the sale and purchase price of that Class A share shall be the price as established by the corporation. Notwithstanding any provision of this paragraph to the contrary. in the case of resignation, alone, if the corporation does not have a total of sixty-five Class A and Class B shareholders or Class B shares are for sale, the sale and purchase price of a Class A share sold to and purchased by the corporation regardless I of when it was purchased by the shareholder from the corporation j ■' shall be limited to the following percentages of sale and puchase price paid to the corporation by the shareholder: 75% if the resignation occurs within the first year of ownership, 90% if the resignation occurs within the second year of ownership, or 100% ^he resignation occurs within the third year of ownership or thereafter. However, in no event shall the corporation be obligated to purchase more than five Class A shares in any twelve month period. If upon resignation, termination, or death, any indebtedness relating to the ownership of such Class A share is not imm**diately paid to the corporation, the corporation may deduct such Indebtedness f om the sale and purchase price to be paid to the shareholder or to his or her estate. 2,11 Reinstatement. Any former Class A shareholder who is not presently indebted to the corporation, and who desires again to become a Class A shareholder, shall make application pursuant to paragraph 2.4 above |fe E.' r''-. i-M.r r f- E. t- r*^ r> J-' i :\ “f .1 •y;-;r\§k If WZ< ’ r #f possible^ but not to exceed 180 days following such death. The sale and purchase price of such share shall be as set forth in paragraph 2.10 below. Alternatively, the surviving spouse may elect to have such share transferred to him or her, in which case the corporation shall record the change in stock ownership on its stock regiater, thereby granting to the surviving spouse all rights, liabilities, and obligations which are incident to owner ship o£ a Class A share. In the event a Class A shareholder dies leaving no surviving spouse, that shareholder's estate must sell to the corporation, and the corporation must purchase, said share as soon as reasonably possible, but not to exceed 180 days following such death. The sale and purchase price of such share shall be as set forth in paragraph 2.10 below. 2.10 Sale to and Purchase By Corporation. A Class A share can only be sold to and purchased by the corporation. Such sale and purchase can only be effected in one of three ways; resigna tion, termination, or death. The sale and purchase price of such Class A share shall be the sale and purchase price paid to the corporation by the shareholder when the shareholder purchased the sltare from the corporation. For shareholders of record as of October 1, 1987, this price shall not include the interest portion of the shareholder fee payments made to the corporation. However, if the corporation has a total of sixty-five Class A and Class B shareholders, and no Class B shares are for sale, and a prospective purchaser of a Class A share is approved in the manner set forth paragraph 2.4 above, and such prospective !• . ' ;»v r- f' IIk. •\ -7 1 share. The corporation must purchase slid resigned share as soon as reasonably possible, but not to exceed 180 days following such surrender. The sale and purchase price of such share shall be as set forth in paragraph 2.10 below. 2.8 Termination. The ownership of a Class A share may be terminated by the corporation only upon the following conditions; 1) that the Class A shareholder be sent a letter advising of the proposed termination not less than 10 days prior to a meeting of the shareholders, such letter to be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, to his or her last known address; 2) that the notice of such meeting to shareholders shall advise of the proposed termination; and 3) that such termination shall be approved by a 75% majority of a quorum. Upon such approval, all of such shareholder's rights, interests, and privileges in or to the corporation and its pro .'ty shall immediately cease. Such shareholder shall im.nediately surrender his or her stock certificate to the corporation and pay in full all indebtedness to the corporation.The corporation must purchase said terminated share as soon as reasonably possible, but not to exceed 30 days following such surrender. The sale and purchase price of such share shall be as set forth in paragraph 2.10 below. 2.9 Death of Shareholder. In the event a Class A shareholder dies leaving a surviving spouse, the surviving spouse may elect to sell such share to the corporation, in which case the corporation must purchase said share as soon as reasonably TW, ’ * • •• i* L• nr if f. r. w>-,,S • ,t»‘* h-> li**I|^ I* k.I'i V. ' I.. a •'r, $'■ ii/ fi^': SV.i'r k ffe.vl<- .V- ’. ;• A js M )t *.l >S^ A shareholder complying with a plan of purcha'• approved by the board of directors and providing a certific. * of ifisvrance as set forth relow. 2.5 Sale to and Purchase By Shareholder. I he silo and pur chase price of a Class A share to a prospec'..vo Clar A share holder is an’ . lall remain $6,500 until an«j ur,l the corporation shall change it. 2.6 Stock Certificate. Upon admission as conditioned in paragraph 2.4 above, and upon payment in full to the corporation of the purchase price of said Class A share, such Class A shareholder shall issued Class stock certificate representing his or her share Class stock the ^.orporat ion.Said share shaJl not be pledged, used as collateral encumbered, transferred, or assigned in any way or manner other than being transferred back to the corpot ation. 2.7 Resignation. Any Class A shareholder may resign his or her Class A share from the corporation, but such resignation must be made in writing and filed with the Secretary. The Secretary shall promptly subrait such resignation to the board of directers. Upon receipt of such resi^na’i ion by the board of direqtors all r’ the rights, ince'.asts, and privileg^ss represented by ownership such Class A share in or to the corporation and its property shall imme'Mately cease.Such shareholder shall immediately surrender his or her Class A stock certificate the corporati«'*n and pay ii^ full all indebtedness to the corporation represented by ownership of such Class A ) fwt-ar^ r*M 71 • ■ o 4 1.13 Meetings of Directors. Regular meetings ot the board o£ directors shall be held at least quarterly, at s«ich time and place as shall be designated by the President. Special meetings of t5.e board of directors may be held at the call of the President, or at the request of three directors submitted in writing to the Secretary. Notice of regular and special meetings shall be given to each director prior to the date of meeting. ARTICLE II. Shares si? 2.1 Classes. The shares of Big Island, Inc., shall consist of the following classes: Class A and Class B. The total of Class A and Class B shares is limited to six^y-five. 2.2 Ownership. No person, including his or her spouse, may own more tha' *'ne Class A share. Class A Shares Privileges. A person owning a Class A share pursuant paragraph 2.4 below, shall be entitled to all of the privil-'it; -eges of the corporation, is shall h.s or her spouse.ii-.There ir if" well as all shares purchased s Class A shares thereafter. Class A share roust be proposed by an existing owner of a Class A shall be one vote for each class A shart;. All outstanding shares as of October 1, 1987, are hereby classifi d as Class A shares as 2.4 Method of Elect!A candidate for ownership of a h-' % i m share. The propoaal shall be submitted to the President. The candidate shall then be admitted as a Class A shareholder upon approval by a 75% majority of a qv^.-.rure subject to such Class jll: -! r™ ; \4' ;;1Sy 1 i?'- ’■i 'H •■ Y:V; :-y- ^.f, ■ .t*:'mi'5>' V.-- ■ r V;^j. , V>m.tf---' X^f- Si‘t n.,i^wkm.W’ i4:'V'. ■■ • mx ------—wtir^ ■M 1 v-^. ,.)0 render a full and complete statement of the finances of the corporation and such other statements from time to time as shall be required of him or her by the boatd of directors. 1.8 Removal. An officer of the corporation may be removed from office by at least 80% majority vote of the board of directors. 1,9 Annual and Special Meetings. The annual meeting of the corporation for the election of a board of directors and other business shall be held during the month of September each year. The Secretary shall mail notice of the annual meeting to all shareholders at least ten days prior to such meeting. Special meetings of the corporation may be called at any time by order ^be President or by three members of the board of directors or b^ ten shareholders. Notification of such special meeting must be given to the Secretary, who shall notify all sharehOA i3 by mail at least ten days prior to the date for such special meeting. 1.10 Vote. Each shareholder shall be entitled to one vote at annual and special meetings 1.11 Quorum. A quorum shall consist of a majority of shareholders, h quorum shall be necei«sary in order to conduct an annual or special meeting of the corporation. 1.12 Proxies. A shareholder may cast his or her vote at an annual or special meeting either in person or by proxy. A proxy shall not be valid for more than sixty days from the date of its execution. A proxy must be in writing and signed by the shareholder and filed with the Secretary before or at the time of the meeting. Tfdistifi ■ J u ■<; ^ .r19 O- follows: President, Vice President, Secretary, and Treasurer, each of whom shall serve one year. The President and Vice Pres ident must be chosen from the board of directors. The Secretary 0fid Treasurer need not be chosen from the board of directors. A majority in number of the board of directors shall constitute a quorum. 1.5 President. The President, and in his or her absence. the Vice-President, shall preside at all meetings of the corpora tion and at all meetings of the board of directors. The Presi dent shall be the principal executive officer of the corporation and, subject to the control of the board of directors, shall in general supervise the business and affairs of the corporation. The President, in general, shall perform all duties incident to the office of the President and such other duties as may be pre scribed by the board of directors from time to time. 1.6 Secretary. The Secretary shall keep a record of all meetings of the corporation and of the board of directors, duly give such notices as required herein or by the Articles, collect all funds and pay them over to the Treasurer, and perform such duties as are usuf.Iy perform**d by the secretaries of such corp- birations. m 1.7 Treasurer. The Treasurer shall keep safely all the funds of the corporation and pay them out as provided by the Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws of the corporation, or as te may be required by the board of directors. The Treasurer cannot hold any other office. At each scheduled meeting he or she shall I?'" f- T.:- . ■i B pi: .5 i"‘'u. p'-1^fe Itv . l.‘-Iv:: f^V ^:aXr. ?r ‘■^ f- ■. ■’1., |%k'- ■^-: W^' # • fe' Jrki- fe: L^rSi'.i'sv'fei.ft- fet-r- III ■m.m-ifi BIG ISLAND. INC.P.O. Box 188 • Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 rr o AMENDED BYLAWS OF BIG ISLAND, INC. ARTICLE I. Management. 1.1 Management. The management of the business and affairs oC the corporation shall be in the hands of a board of directors, who shall be chosen from the shareholders by a majority vote of a quorum of all shareholders at the annual meeting of the corpor ation. 1.2 Election. There shall be seven persons on the board of directors. Each shall serve a term of two years, or until his or her successor is elected. These terms shall be staggered so that at one annual meeting three new directors are elected, and at the next annual meeting four new directors are elected. 1.3 Vacancies. The board of directors has the power to fill any vacancy occurring in the board for any cause other than the expiration of the term of office. Such persons appointed to fill such vacancies shall be from the shareholders and shell only serve until the expiration of that term of office. 1.4 Officers. At the first meeting of the board of directors after the annual meeting, which may be immediately after the close of the annual meeting, the board of directors shall proceed to organize by electing officers for the ensuing % year. The executive officers of the corporation shall be as A r- 5- r (■•’4 r' »* •*.» If.. irir y' .’p l|v: K li i.V P®S?A :^r' I '♦.‘Vc" , # W - •sfe;. '■*t, i--'- • •,»• • •• ■■ mrr-' -■;tivr!-‘- i ■■■M: •> 1^-’! ;--v •■rd±TTS 3 ARTICLE XI. SHar«* H 4121 Th« corporation has authority to issua two classes of stock, Clais A and Class B. The maximue. aggregate number of Class A shares that the corporation has the authority to issue is 100 shares. The maximum aggregate number of Class B shares that the corporation has authority to issue is 100 shares. Class B shares cannot vote on the issue of li<^uidation and are exempt 'from dues and- assessments* ^All • outstanding- shares ot- common stock as of October 1, 1987, are hereby classified as Class A g^l^^es as well as all shares purchased as Class A shares thereafter. ARTICLE XII. Incorporator The name and address of each incorporator Is: (1) Thomas A* Judd 550 Shelard Tower 600 South Highway 18 St. Louis Park, MU 55426 ARTICLE XII. Shareholder Rights and Action The shareholders shall take action by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of a quorum as defined by the by-laws at a duly held meeting of the shareholders, except where a larger proportion is required by law, by these articles of incorporation, by the by->laws, or by a shareholder control agraamant. No shareholder of the corporation shall have any preemptive rights unless the board of directors otherwise praacribes* No shareholder of the corporation shall be entitled to cumulative voting rights. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand this 23rd day of February 1989. Jekbqe Muell Secr^ary r X II- Ia-. '^■i-m. Is ■ %■■If: ‘ii’. H?f.'f- it. r- ft m p^" •' Hit ll#‘ Fi ; t m- Ifer,wi., ki?ifP^: m.::sl':M'- ?r.'- ^0 &1" N I j —•; fx. • -*rr ' ^ ARTICLE VII. By-Laws Proper by-laws to control the duties of the officers and to regulate the affairs of the corporation, Including the actions of the shareholders of the corporation, the control of the property of the corporation, meetings of the board of directors and shareholders of the corporation, and such other things as shall be necessary and proper for ^he carrying on of the business of the corporation, shall be adopted. ARTICLE IX. Contracts The board of directors of the corporation is hereby authorized and empowered to enter into such contracts and obligations as it shall in its discretion deem necessary to accomplish the purposes of this corporation, and such contracts and obligations shall be binding upon the corporation in accordance with and subject to the by-laws of the corporation. ARTICLE X. Property Shareholders of the corjjoration shall receive certificates of stock representing one share of common stock in the corporation, which shall entitle them to all the privileges of the corporation as defined in the by-laws, but which, in case the shareholder shall resign or be terminated in acccordance with and subject to any of the by-laws of the corporation or in case the shareholder shall die, shall give the holder thereof no right nor interest in the property of this corporation, real or personal, privileges therek.i, and shall become null and void and of no effect upon the contingencies above mentioned. -.'1 ^;r't' if- m ^•1fmKj I PowersARTICLE IV. _______ This corporation may hold real estate and franchises and own property and may borrow money and issue bonds or other evidences of indebtedness, ai:d in order to secure the same, may execute mortgages or deeds of trust upon its property, for the acquisition or improvement of any real estate or other property which may be acquirctd or held by it for the purposes aforesaid. ARTICLE V. Shareholders The shareholders of this corporation shall at all times consist of such persons as are shareholders of the corporation as shown by the records of said corporation and pursuant to the by laws of the corporation. ARTIC'C VI. Directors The managc.-ment of this corporation shall be vested in a board of directors, seven (7) in numb#'*', who shall be elected from the shareholders by a major. vott of a quorum of share holders at the annual meeting of this coiporation. They shall have the management of its business and prudential concerns. Direccors shall be elected biannual ly for a term of two years. Their terms shall be staggered so that at one annual meeting three new directors are elected, and at the next annual meeting four new directors are elected. ARTICLE VII. Officers The executive officers of the corporation shall be elected by the board of directors and shall hold theic offices for the term of one year. The executive officers shall consist of a President, Vice President, Secretary, and Treasurer. 2 ^ ^ ^A^ . <S 4- ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT OF aiG ISLAND, INC. fi’S;: Th«se Articles of Aaendment supersede the original Articles of Incorporation of Big Island, Inc. and all amendments to them. The changes were adopted pursuant to Minn, Stat| 302A, • ARTICLE I. Name- The corporate name of this corporation shall be BIG ISLAND, IKC. ARTICLE II. Location (a) The registered office of the corporation shall be 1530 Pillsubury Center, 200 South Sixth Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402. (b) The club house a^ ^ grounds of the corporaw.on shall be located In Orono, Hennepin County, and its principal place of business In the city of Orono. ARTICLE III. Purpose The purpose of this corporation shall be: (a) The encouragement of recreation and water related activities# and of outdoor sports and pastime among the several shareholders of the corporation; (b) The enjoyment of rational and social amusements; and, (c) As incidental to said purposes and to facilitate the same# acquire property, establish and maintain a club, grounds and any improvements thereon, and furnish such accommodations as the shareholders may require. I 8 •a ,-.’0 2 h 4 Vi* iu i\*r. f ’T' ■fefc. if- 1^;- fe' (•«'-; •' ■^ys«- ■■ ■ V ‘>. i'f ill ■ If*- ■ir »:• BIG ISLANDr INC. CERTIFICATE OF THE SECRETARY The undersigned/ being the duly elected, qualified and acting Secretary of Big Island, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, does hereby certify that: Attached hereto is a true and complete copy of the Articles of Incorporation of Big Island, Inc. and the Amended Bylaws of Big Island, Inc. adopted by unanimous vote of the Shareholders on February 23, 1989; and, said Articles and Bylaws have not been amended or modified in any manner since that date and are on the date hereof in full force and effect. Dated: August 1990 BIG ISLAND, INC. 5782b.179/89009 Oi » ■* \ k D i. Jum 9,1990 lays Corn Days parade set for Aug. 12 The 191h annual Corn Days Parade is scheduled lor 1 p m. Sunday. Aug 12, in l/mg I^ke. Parlicipanls will line up off Willow Drive slarting at r:l5. Positions in Uic fKiradc arc awarded on a rirst<ome. first- • wrvcdbasis, and early registra tion in encouraged to help parade organizers. The parade fee is $15 (non profit organizations are ex empt). due upon confirmation. For more information, call T.J. llaislet at 473-08C4. COUPON OFF OUR aMUPL'ifE SERVICE Oi • UiWcUlon Oi Filer < 12 RM Mnlenanoe Check • Plus we vacuum your cm.. .oom|)tsU In 15 minuies Reg. mss - NOW M9.95 MoU Cara & Ihjcks Hours: M-F 9-7 Sal. e-5 472-1337 5293 Shomline Dr, Next to HMtees •Mound* Club: From page IA IJiey wish. \V<*'re all (Hjual Dwners." The pi csci-ve was l)ot n in 1983 when a small group of investors purr ha.icd two acres. Ihcy tkrided to h»nn Big l.siand, Inc. and lx?gan lo attract arlditional invrsit«-s. By 1987. U»e corporal ion pur- c.Sased an adjacent pj-.rcci Uiat contained the hou.se ami twocar garage. Today, Uic house is a favorite retreat, esjiecially for wintertime visitors. The memliers have also made many inipruvoincnts to I hr* property, according to I’al llanily. Excelsior, who is the praident of Uie board of directors. Projects include the addition of picnic tables, protective feiK-ing on Om* bluffs, lighted sfaii-ways,;» wharf fo' u iniiiiing, a volleyh.. >uH .ind liorscsli Johnson sai- member has diiir, . reasons for joining 1 * > I \ Mrtiilirrs ciijo) viJInliall nod ,i variety of oilier recreational punoUts al Big Island, liie.'.s |iro|ierly. Island, liKV “Everyone seems to find ilifferent ways lo use this 'roperty," he said. "We ve had birttiday parlies, kid s parties, company parlies. LiltJe Ixviguc parties ami father-and-.son cam|KMils From just snoozing on the dee k in Uic sun to iakiMg a s.'inna after cross coiinli y skiing, we ran fit a memlMT's suniiner ;iml winter neetls. Brian Tiehy. Isxeelsior, is one of Ihe fouixk'i s of Big Island, Inc. He believes that if offers one of the last op- {Mirtunitics for people to en joy Lake Minnetonka in an ownership capacity. A refun- dabie $7,500 initiaUon fee is charged to new members and quarterly dues are $85. Big Island, Inc. will have an open house for prospec tive members from noon un til 4 p.m. on Saturday, June 2. and Sunday, June 3. For more information or transporbilion lo the island, call Johuson at 474-4781. Interested in Volunteer Work? Look in Ihe Clabsifieds for programs needing your help. tow. >■■»•«? YacI ’ The p< violating the mid- about it. One of ing field conditioi shore. Thecli nelonka out, unin which w: ding to I Yacht as mcml forced to currenti (able for But loi back yar Uie City r Ui listcnm 10 the . 'hB thMfi^ofttie z. ia.......................4ILFOIL WanitfP 'iM^lofoyr■dMrlM^ iftloyr de£*M(ttoiilBC ihe point out of sight (jiBtir-fffcoih lithe jSDcta«\P^ 3 to &rhig .P a ■p»ii.f.,.the aiiicy i :^''ai«imd Cmoo Point i til cdt<i|^ ’tahtyotf loedofweet t Li td.tf’W < m rding v^ill ucLUi aiuaiiii utc u«i\c uiuii Sept. 7. Last year’s harvest, which staggered through delayed delivery the harvesters and amended schedules, cut about 665 acres. This summer, with the LMCD having its own manager overseeing the opera tion, Paurus expects to harvest on nearly the entire 1,500-acre limit set by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). "Weather permitting, of course," said Pauriis, project manager for the Lake Min- 1 4 10 • 141 4 4«1 'C 1 u. 4I-4V IiiO 04 every accessible bay on the lake seeing eitlier the "Yankee" or "Rebel” gioup of tiarvesters cutting this summer. In keeping with Civil War history, the Yankee group of two harvesters will be cutting the northern shore, and the Rebel group of three machines the southern. I'he Rebel group will include the harvester donate<l for use on the lake by Hennepin Pa> ks. It is IIARVtlST: Tu next page Irozeii any sale oi ‘ development of the land in the interim. Tumblad prepared the restriu* tion calling (or the moratorium. It was expected to be discussed by the MinnetrisU City CouncU June 4, after this issue of the Sailor went to press. He said it is needed to give the city time to revamp the section of its Comprdiensive Plan that decribes how the rity would like to see the Soutn Halstead Bay area developed. "We are not trying to close any builders out," said Wally Clevenger, Minnetrista mayor. Actually we are looking for idIkM ImciL tnick biwaiitefM^; CouncU to scrutinize Reuter’s exemption need this tune to eiibure it is handled correctly."toto-i fir tor ’s InabUity to recycle 85 per- • V - cant'of garbage the company [ sa prsmlses, the • reodm. L s the Matropolitan,;. under • the exclusion the , reoomte; tm esr a. lielrapolitan Council granted t'-:^■ntod to ileutor^l rRcuierlnl9e5.it is the only gar i gHtafA; i. i :.v JN A llittacfe oorapeny that does not pay ^,Ontolyltoai4|4i|te|topcrtantippingfceunpos- i44r«sl|llqf totoj edrby. the county. Instead, it oMltonOouncfl tot«iiitoedves 993 per ton from gar bage haulen for the waste brought to its Eden Prairie 'todUty. **This is not real processing. This is not working and we don *t see the prospect that it will. ^ nedentfce .to»5S'l .iiv ♦ *» rac-i? .. ’ Raixiy Johnson, Hennepin County Commissioner r * toptqrplaD * ♦ L I —ms thanks [ diMeto cieMhBdour'i> Many of you also sent com- t laMidia'toedMK: meois^^ complimeais, criti- f eii<f orfnwwBjpcf ’cism and.ai^gedions — along y'with'your pqrmenls. Ws will knqp these in mind at we con- mpoodBd* fit"* cffMis 10 improve our carteaed and gnadto ntotf^Mpeit. t - whidh ywi wfipndMli on how lo itfll make Board members said Reuter d live up to the commit ment company representatives m.'ule in 1985 — to recycle 85 per cent of the garbage -- wlien it asked for the exclusion. Instead Reuter is only recycling 50 per cent of its solid waste and com posting an additional 10 percent. Reuter is also the only com pany allowed to haul garbage outside the county. Currently most of the garbage Reuter does The city’s current Com prehensive Plan calls for residential development in the area, including'^- and»A-acre lots, as well commercial lard- use. But plans for that tsrpe of development came to a halt when Hennepin Parks began _ ,, REUTER: To page 3A t+0>rv^>G r Lti MORATORIUM: To page lOA oni are ex- er bom «d to dw.dfeito.*^ ta >¥olntoiy pqrrna d. advaitfeiagi aad tioM*‘'Vice Preddeai. Lk I loii'qfiitona.' ; .Canniag. ;•.»<;i;... .1,14 fir . 4gnto. thank you. • **». ig Island, Inc. By Tom RaUloCf r'o:.. Cox'/t<».a club across the ‘^rink Its name may sound a bit stiff and formal, but Big Island, Inc. is not about sales projections or market quotas. It’s about fun. This is a corporation with a decidedly different goal: to preserve a portion of Lake Mmnetonka for the year- re'jnd pleasure and enjoy ment of its shardiolders. Big Island. Inc. owns nearly six acres of land on tlie southeast corner of historic Big Island, directly across the bay from Ex celsior. Located near the I..ake Miiu'tCtonka Power SquadroTi's property, the site contains a rustic two- bedroom house, two acres of thick wooils, a picnic area atop a 40-foot bluff, 1,000 feet of lakeshore, beaches and open land for volleyball and other recreational activities. The organh'ation currently lias 44 members, who hail from area conununities. Its membership roU include . families from Excelsior, Tonka Bay, Chanhassen, Mound, Shorewood, Eklen Prairie, Deephaven, Min netonka and Wayzata. "We’ve got members from all walks ^ Ufe,” said Terry Johnson, a Sh ,'ewood resi dent who is membership committee chairman. "Tliey can use the island any time CLUB: To pi«e «A - M'7 2 3 V2_ ^ oo 2.C1 J ? I * i I i I TV I K,.'. i;' r Ih n; Iv N. v% & ;r CITYof ORONO <:n Y ORONOd Post Office Box 66 • Crystal B«y. Minnesota S5323 • MunidpsJ OfBi On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka June 7, 1990 Terry L. Johnson 5065 Anthony Terrace Shorewood, MN 55331 RE; Record Lots 12 and 19, Big Island Dear Mr. Johnson; It has come to the City^ of Orono's attention that you are operating a joint use dock on Big Island without the necessary joint use dock permit. Additionally, the apparent use of the property as a day use recreation area, reguires a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.31, Subdivision 3 (C). I am enclosing a copy of Section 10.31 which regulates properties on Pig Island. I am also including copies of the correspondence in i985 between the City and Mr. Thomas A. Judd who was representing th-:- property at that time, in order that you are fully aware of 'he City's position regarding the use of this property. Enclosed please find an application for joint use dock license, and an application for conditional use permit. I would be pleased to meet with you to discuss these required applications as soon as possible. Sincerelyf Jeanne A. Mabusth Building 6 Zoning Administrator cc:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator Isv ■UtUNNC a ZONING - 47)-73S7 ASHaMNC A0MINISTRAT1O.N A HNA.NCE • 473-73S8 FAX-47MS10 PUBLIC WORKS - 473.7359 I' T IP "' F>v. " V, ' r i!.ta/ilP': •> Thomas A. Judd January 31, 1985 Page 2 If my concerns have no basis and iz is determined that we are dealing with merely a variance to a performance standard of the code, we may proceed with discussion of ycur clients’ formal application. I will contact you as soon as I hear from Tom Radio. Sincerely, . A'A Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator cc:Tom Radio Mike Gaffron Jo Ellen Hurr, LMCD Delegate E’- f’ ; ; H. IKy-h r h ^" . i' I- $: V, ■ U.- ■t,: ■%: r a: :S- 7- ? • hit: f\- ^i V .1 CITY CITY of ORONO F'ust Office Box 66«CrysUil Bay, Minnesota Municipal Offices OF ORONO On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka January 31, 1985 Thomas A. Judd Suite 550 Shelard Tower 600 South Highway 18 Minneapolis, MN 55426-1203 Dear Mr. Judd: Thank you for your letter of January 17th reviewing your clients' proposed use of the property identified as record Lot 19. The total area of the jointly owned 11 parcels is approximately 1.7 acres. Our records reveal that the original owner Mick Lord has neither executed special combination papers nor the procedural lot area variance resolution for filing against the subject property. I would be happy to meet with you to discuss the necessary applications, fees and schedule of meetings. Before I schedule such a meeting, I must seek the opinion of the City Attorney concerning the issue of the need for an area variance for your clients' proposed day use recreation area. Section 10.31, Subdivision 6 (F) Subst.^r dard - Buildable Record Lot Inventory lists the only permitted use for substandard Lot 19 as one-family seasonal recreational use or for a single permitted seasonal dwelling. Section 10.31, Subdivision 3 (C) requires a minimum of five acres for day use recreation areas. The code goes on to further state that if the number of users exceeds 100, the minimum lot area must be increased to maintain ratio of 1 acre per 20 users. Section 10.31, Subdivision 6 (E) Conforming Record Lot Inventory lists seven properties permitted only one-family permitted or conditional uses in the RS District. In consideration of the text and the purpose (Section 10.31, Subdivision 1) ot the RS District code, the City may not be allowed to consider such a variance. Your client may be advised to seek an amendment of the code or an additional 3.3 acres of area. buluim ; a zoning - 473-7357 assessing ADMINISTKATION A FINANCE - 473 7)58 PL'BLIC V»ORKS 47)-7JSV V;'. W’>'^ s fc|0^ A< January 17, 1985 Page Three Masbusth After you have had an opportunity to review this letter, I would like the opportunity to meet with you to discuss any observations, comments or answer any questions that you may have and map out what procedures we need to follow in order to apply for the conditional use permit. I look forward to hearing from you. Very truly yours^,v Thomas A. Judd TAJ/kc i- k- : £ . ■■V'- V iv» I. i-.l. ('r> k i I; i}'r r.: ■>. i' ■I Ms. Jeanne A. Masbusth January 17, 1985 Page Two During the course of the negotiations between the five individuals, now directors of Big Island, Inc., and Mick Lord, the zoning ordinances of Orono were reviewed to determine whether or not the intended use of the Big Island by the club, then to be formed, were compatible with the zoning ordinances. It was determined that the initial use would be in conformance with the ordinances and that the prospective use of the island by the group would be in conformance, if the appropriate permits for uses were acquired from the city. During the past summer. Starting in July, various members would meet during the day out at Big Island to swim and picnic. It is doubtful that there ever J**ore than ten boats at the island, at most and, to my knowledge, there was no overnight docking at the island, unless somebody was camping on the subject property. Most of the time there were approximately two to four boats docketed at the subject property during the day. Accordingly, pursuant to my review and interpre~ tation of the ordinances, this was not in violation of the allowed use. The Board of Directors has asked me t > commence the action necessary to obtain the necessary permits to allow the present owner to better enjoy and utilize the subject property. It is the desire of the present owners to erect a "seasonal dwelling" on the property that would be utilized as a "club house" on the island during the summer. A special design feature of the proposed building is that it can easily be converted into a single family residence if the property were ever sold for residential purposes. The building would be comprised of pri— warily of a screened in porch area with an enclosed area for inclimate weather and would also include a deck area and bathrooms. I would be happy to bring along the most current pro posed building plans for your review when you sc desire. We intend to apply for a Conditional Use under Subdivision 3 of Section 10.31 of Orono's zoning ordinance. The specific use is found under Subsection (c) entitled "Day-Use Recreation Area". Although the property does not constitute five acres, the number of expected users at any one time does not exceed 100 people. The lot width of that shoreline exceeds the minimum requirement of 200 feet. We presently meet or would be able to meet the other requirements within Subsection (c). I N odland . C onn . Judd & N ordaune ATTOPNEYS AT LA/V suite S50 SMEUAAO TOwvfR 600 SOu TM m'Ohw A • -0 MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA 55426*^203 ; [ L--~—— ■ ----------------------li » I JM I 8I9R5 -J — CITY OF ORONO A. DOUGLAS NOO lANO DAVID H CONN THOMAS A. JUDO rosklyn j. nordaune JOHN W COCHRAN BSTTV A. FRIESEN CARTIR DELAITTRC telephone 46’ 2* 54 T C6CC January 17» 1985 Ms. Jeanne A. Masbusth Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Pe: Record Lot 19 Dear Ms. Masbusth: During our conversations last fall and in December, I discussed with you the ownership by Big Island, Inc. of Record Lot 19 and the intended use of the lot. You have requested me to put in writing a description of the intended use of the property. I thought it might be informative for you to know a little bit of the history and the circumstances surrounding the acquisition of the subject property by Big Island, Inc. Approximately three or four years ago, when the subject property was listed for sale, a few people contacted Mick Lord regarding the possible sale to a group of people. Those negotiations con tinued off and on during the three to four year period. Finally, in the spring of 1984i, five individuals entered into a purchase agreement with Mick Lord for the purchase of the island. Those five individuals formed Big Island, Inc.’, and the membership now totals approximatexy 31 couples. Most of the members have grown up and have now settled in the Excelsior area of Lake Minnetonka. Accordingly, most of the members have used the lake for 20 to 30 years. It was the desire of the group to find a "piece of the lake" that they could preserve and enjoy for themselves and their families. The subject property offered the unique opportunity to the group to satisfy that desire. Many of the members have used various bays around Big Island as meeting places during the summer to socialize and enjoy the lake. Many of the members were guests of Mick Lord at the subject property over the past summers during his ownership and greatly enjoyed the fine characteristics offered by the subject property. Accordingly, the subject pro perty was an ideal spot for the members to have a private spot to meet, socialize, swim and enjoy the lake. tev. ir- iV, r'rIU Mayor Peterson 6 Orono Council Members John R. Gerhardson, Acting City Administrate 'll Proas Dates Subjects Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning 6 Zoning Aw^n^tr^^r August 6, 1991 #1647 Gerald Benoit, 3403 Eastlake Street Conditional Use Pennit/Variance - Resolution Soning District - LR-IA, since family lakeshore residentia acre, unsewered Application - Request for setback and hardcover variances to construct detached garage, conditional use permit for construction in "floodfringe" area. List of Exhibits - A - Resolution B - Planning Commission Action Notice 7/15/91 C - Memo & Exhibits of 6/11/91 Discussion **Please review tl;e memo and exhibits of June 11th. Briefly, applicant proposes to remove his existing one-stall garage and construct a two-stall, 24'x26‘ detached garage to replace it. Applicant's initial proposal left a 5' setback to the house, and less than the required 26' to the creek which runs the length of the rear yard. That proposal required slight variances to the front and left side street setback requirements. 75-250' hardcover was 33.7%, with 15.9% in the 250-500* zone. Staff proposed "Option B", an alternative which limin*»*^«‘S the variances for house setback and creek setback, ® garA96 8ll9htly closer to both roadways but sti31 behind the front line of the house and somewha,: screened by existing vegetation along Bayside Road, and which reduces the 75-250' hardcover from 33.9% to 28.9%, by placing more of it in the 250- 500' zone. Planning Cc—Ission Recc—endwtion - Planning Commission on a vote of 7-0 recommended approval of Option B, noting that a two-stall garage was a reasonable request and in this case a detached garage is appropriate. Planning Commission also recommended approval of a conditional use permit for work in the *floodfringe" sheet flow area subject to a minimum garage floor height of 935' and subject to any perm.. »- that may be required by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. V- I h- ;#• »■ m' Ip m.'S>-:^'." f '-.-r- ■ ► r* ’ ■ • T-’•■ ■ ii’i Zoning File 11647 August 6« 1991 Page 2 of 2 Planning Commission further conditioned their recommendation on City verification of remo^ i:l of any potential septic discharge conduits* As noted in the June 11th memo# a previous property owner had been discharging the laundry water directly to the creek through a tile llna from the house. This practice has ceased and staff will be verifying that the offending tile line has been eliminated. Staff ReooMendatlcm Staff recommends approval per the Planning Commission recommendation. A resolution for approval is attached for Council review. 1 rr fa'!. H. A RBSOLDTIOM GRANTING VARIANCBS TO MONICIPAL XOHING CODE SECTION 10.23» SUBDIVISION 6 (B), SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2, AND SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8, AND GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 10 PILE #1647 NHEREAS, Gerald Benoit (hereinafter "the applicant") is the o%mer of the property located at 3403 Eastlake Street within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows : The following property within Hennepin County^ Minnesota: The east 50* of the west 150' of Lot 1» Block 0, "Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka". ALSO, Lot 1, Block 6, "Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka", EXCEPT the west 150' of said Lot 1 (hereinafter "the property"); and NHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono to permit construction of a detached two-car garage, i variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23,requiring Subdivision 6 (B) to allow a front setback of 39' where a front setback of 50* is normally required, and a left side street setback of 37* where a side street setback of 50' is normally required; and a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to allow hardcover in the 75-250* zone in excess of the 25% hardcover normally allowed; and a variance and conditional use permit per Section 10.55, Subdivisions 8 and 10 to allow construction in a floodfringe sheet flow area. NON, TBEREPORB, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1647 2. The property is located in the LR-IA Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. Page 1 of 7 VO, jkV ■ t: 3. The property is approximately 0.27 acre in area/ contains a portion of the creek leading from Classen Lake to Stubbs Bay/ and has not been provided with municipal sewer. 4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 15, 1991 and recommended approval of the proposed variances and conditional use permit as described above, based on the following findings: A) The proposed garage to be located 10' from the existing house as required by Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 12, and to be located 26' from the creek as required by Section 10.55, Subdivision 8, replaces an existing garage located only 5' from the existing house and only 14' from the creek. Therefore, in those two respects the new garage will be conforming whereas the old garage was non-conforming. B) The setbacks from the front street lot line and the side street lot line are proposed to be 39' and 37* respectively. The 11' front street setback variance is justified in that the garage will still be behind the front line of the existing house. The side street setback variance of 13' is supported by the fact that substantial screening exists along Bayside Road so that the garage will not be obtrusive. C) Hardcover in th . 75-250' zone under proposed "Option B" will be reduced from 33.9% existing to 28.9%, after removals of the existing garage and specific areas of plastic lined rockbeds. Hardcover in the 250-500' zone will remain below the 30% limit. D) Except for the area within the defined banks of the creek that traverses the property, the entire property is located in a floodfringe sheet flow area, requiring that the floor of the garage be placed at least 1* above the 934' creek overflow elevation at this site. It is reasonable and feasible to construct the garage with a floor elevation of 935*. 5. Per Section 10.55, Subdivision 10 (B), the proposed garage meets the setbacks required by Section 10.55, Subdivision 8, and in the sheet flow area will not restrict or obstruct any floodflow nor will it raise the level of the floodflow. Page 2 of 7 ¥ h i-^'- :p/. V5'i-> 6. City staff has verified that a previously existing line used for direct laundry waste discharge to the creek by a previous occupant of the property has been eliminated. The construction of the proposed garage will not affect t e existing septic system nor will it affect any possible useable future septic system development on the property» because there are no conforming alternative drainfield sites on the property. 7. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on ^his property are peculiar to it and do not apply Generally to othor property in this zoning district; that graxiv-ing the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties? would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty? is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant? ana would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zcning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 8. The City Council finds that granting a conditiona.. use permit to allow the construction of a 24'x26* dettched garage within the floodfringe sheet flow area will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a tire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, vill it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. OONCLOSlOMSf ORDBR AMD CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.23, Subdivisions 6 (B) to allow a detached 24'x26 ’ garage to be constructed 39’ from the front lot line and 37 from the side street lot line where 50' setbacks from those lines are normally required, and grants a variance to allow hardcover in the 75-250' zone of 28.9% where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed, and grants a conditional use permit and variance per Section 10.55, Subdivisions 8 and 10 to allow construction of said detached garage within a floodfringe sheet flow area, subject to the following conditions: Page 3 of 7 m--. & P- U‘-m.m 1, The site plan referred to as Option B shall be adhered to and is attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. 2. Hardcover in the 75-250' zone is approved at a level of 28.9%. Hardcover in the 250-500' zone is approved at a level of 20.8%. All existing and proposed hardcover approved with this variance approval is recorded in the calculation worksheet and diagram enclosed with this resolution as Page 4. The current property owner and all future owners of this property are placed on notice that hardcover in the 75-250' zone shall not be increased above the currently approved level and any proposed improvements of this property that will result in additional hardcover must be approved by the City. Such approval may result in requirement for concurrent equivalent or greater removals of existing hardcover. All existing hardcover scheduled for removal as a condition of this resolution must be removed prior to the footing inspection for the new construction. 3. The garage floor height shall be no lower than elevation 935*, and the applicant's surveyor shall verify the elevation of the finished garage slab prior to framing of said garage. 4. The property owner and all future property owners are placed on notice that direct discharges of household or laundry waste directly to the creek are a violation of City ordinances. 5. A City of Orono garage construction permit must be obtained by the applicant prior to construction, but shall not be issued until applicant has received approval for the floodfringe encroachment from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed Distr 't. 6. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are pe^issive only and m^ St be exercised by application for a building permit for the retaining walls within one year of the date of Council approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (August 12, 1992). 7. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 5 of 7 .A m- -m mr w I ... n Gor.ild r:. Penoi*'. lock 8, Bayside Addition to Lnk'^ Minnetonk.n Htnncpin Cour., Minr^osotn \ _‘75-2^ssl! 2©^*C-: ./^use Cee&JiJ^eh- CfottTiof^y t><Cl\/6WAy _______ SxVi^uyAuc.______ ,t>scK_____— :______}fijeTAi*^tf^c^ lAJAu------ ___A ____Bi-i--: s-P.' g ___ Wiisf. _ C . ___________........................................................................ _.. AB88.11 sf :i„ :JiS“ • : /7t*.S S.-C. ZSD ~ SOQ* xx>M4$.X _______ _______^MAAt - _______^«</S77Alii^ ______lx(t|«iwAY _____Sl^U)/kUC_________ _____smtt____ . - - A s Ei>S.B a.df. 3.\Z.__ SOS' a/. C 3S© s.^. 7?.9 aJT. B^.C. sJC. c t> ............................. /V07.a S:f. ^gaMou*cr.;. u s/. /Ccei?r-» e^j^nc. ^p-nofo'*B _________ / D TO Oo o t. . - ItMtJ A ISI.foo e/JSTVoL Wp •■■ it. -•. iu.vi’jifi ?. Jffi _ 8. The undersigned applicant has read^ understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself# his heirs# successors and assignsr hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 12th day of August# 1991. ATTESTS Dorothy M. Ballin# City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson# Mayor Property 0%mer(s} STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of August# 1991 by Barbara A. Peterson 6 Dorothy M. Hallin# Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono# a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public m;: ■ V*'* fc ;ev. •' n ■■ • V- .1-Page 6 of 7 ^ las .. 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) 8S. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) On this _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ day of _ _ _ _ _ _^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _t 199^_ before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing Instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199 , before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to mo to be the person(8) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 7 of 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - -CITY OF ORONO ZOHIHG PILE #1647 cJ^taTLy? MN 55323 NOTICE OF PLANNIHC CO"«S?JON »CnO« 473-7357 Date of Notice: //16/91 ’ ^ ^ — — — — ------------------------------—------------------------------------— —-----------------------------------------------------------------------—--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- — — — — — — TO* Gerald Benoit COPIES TO: 3403 Eastlake Street I Long Lake, MN 55356 _________________________ TIPS OF APPLICATIOH* Conditional Use Pennit/Variance DBR OF MBBTIHGi 7/15/91 VOTE: 7 For 0 Against PI aiming CoHMissioD reccxmends the folloiring: Approval subject to the conditions noted below TOTES 6 SPECIAL COHDITIOMS: ^ . Variances for garage location per site plan "Option B" (copy attached). - Conditional use permit for work in "Flood Fringe" area. r'- L5-V Garage floor height to be no lower than elevation 935’. Subject to City verification of removal of potential septic discharge conduits (please contact Mike Gaffron to arrange an inspection). Subject to any conditions that may be imposted by the Minnehaha Creek , Watershed District (you need to contact them regarding permit for construction in the floodplain/flood fringe - 473-4224). m Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council Monday , August 12, 1991* neeting starts at 7:00 p.n* H If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the Planning Commission. iT * %■ I' I?'' r I- ■■ • I':if. \ * I., -■- t- .i. ■- —Gerald FJ. Banci^. ock Sr Bayside Addition Hennepin C o u n t; •, M i a n<: rr I'K r M- !■b-.i V' K'b . s?: tW: I I- r-'I'- ?:; t o L a k a 'A i n n a t o n k a = o - n . ^ « fas'/5/. 82.7Q o o O O' -»n .•Wes'f \e\.yo \ \ bi,. ■■* •• -.J ^ " '-AJL Tos Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson 5 Frost Date: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator June Ilf 1991 Subjects #1647 Gerald Benoit - 3403 Eastlake St. - Variance - Public Hearing Soning District - LR-IA, Single family lakeshore residential, 2 acre, unsewered Application - Request for setback and hardcover variances to construct detached garage, conditional use permit for construction in "flood fringf area. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit B Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K Exhibit L Application Plat Map Property Owners List Letter of Request Survey Site Plan, Option A Site Plan, Option B Hardcover Calculations Site Photograph Construction Plans Flood Zone Map Septic Card Pertinent Code Sections *■ 1. 2. 3. Section 10.23, Subdivision 6(B) - Yard/setback requirements. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover regulations. Section 10.55, Subdivisions 8 & 10 - Wetlands and flood plain regulations. 4. Section 10.03, Subdivision 12 - Garage to house setback. Pertinent Figures Setbacks A. Front Setback B. Side Street Setback C. Creek Setback D. Garage**Bouse Garage Existing Required or A1lowed Applicants Option A Var. Staff Option B 46'50'45'5'39' 55'50'45'5’37' 14'26'20'6'26' 5.5'10’5'5'10' Var. 11' 13* > u &.I w r i it ^r.i r. 83 8'/: |l'. ku... Zoning File #1647 June Hr 1991 Page 2 Hardcover Existing Allowed Applicants Option A Staff Option B 75-250' 25C-500' 33.9% 13.4% 25% 30% 33.7% 15.9% 28.9% 20.8% Lot Coverage:12.5%15%14.3%14.3% Pertinent Pacts - 1.The applicant proposes to remove his existing 412 s.f. detached garage and replace it with a 624 s.f. garage. This construction will also entail some additional driveway. 2.In discussions with the applicantr staff has suggested a second planr discussed in this memo as Option B, which reduces the number and extent of variances needed. Please refer to Exhibits F and G to compare Options A and B. 3.The applicant recently purchased the vacant lot formerly known as 3401 East lake Street r and has legally combined the two properties. Howeverr even with the additional lotr the gross lot area is just under 12,000 s.f. or about 0.27 acre in this 2-acre zone. 4."Stubbs Bay Creek", which flows from Lake Classen to Stubbs Bay# flows through the rear of the property. This is a major drainageway for north central Orono# and staff recommends that any variances granted with this application be conditioned on the applicant granting the City a 20* drainage easement centered on the centerline of the creek. 5.The 929.4 normal lake elevation contour is somewhat east of the mouth of the creek# hence a portion of this property is in the 75-250* setback zone# with the remainder in the 250- 500* zone. There is approximately 277 s.f. of rock with plastic on the property# which would have to be removed as part of the recent Council directive on hardcover. The plastic could be replaced with nonwoven fabric weed barrier if the property owner desires. Option h V8. Option B Referring to the variance request table at the beginning of this memo# Option A requests a 5' setback between the garage and the house# and a 20* setback to the creek. Under Option A# the garage would extend closer to East lake Street and Bayside Road than the required 50* front and side street setback. Some widening of the driveway would be necessary with this plan. ’•V 1 :.' ?■ t - ii n i-■.■‘.: '_'-'v ■ Zoning File #1647 June 11/ 1991 Page 3 Staff recommended Option B to the applicant with the intent of maintaining the required 26' setback to the creek and 10' setback to the house. While this reduces the street setbacks/ the garage still remains behind the front line of the house/ and is screened from Bayside Road by existing vegetation. Hardcover with this proposal is slightly higher than Option A due to the probable need for slightly additional driveway width. Flood Plain Issoes As can be seen from the attached Flood Plain Map/ the house and proposed garage are in Flood Zone B/ a sheet flow area between the 100 year and 500 year flood boundaries, by definition the "flood fringe". Sheet flow would occur if the creek overflowed its banks onto the adjacent land, which is generally sloped toward the lake. Such a sheet flow would be of relatively short duration and probably only a few inches deep. Our Code allows structures in a sheet flow area under specific standards. Staff discussions with the DNR resulted in confirmation that thev would not specifically review this type of application, as 1* ng as the garage floor is 1* above the 934' regulatory flood protection elevation at that point along the creek. Therefore, one condition of garage approval would be to have the garage slab elevation no lower than elevation 935.0. Approximately 1' of fill would be required to accomplish this based on topographic information in our files. Staff has conferred with City Engineer Glenn Cook on this, and would recommend approval of a "flood fringe" conditional use permit under the above-noted conditions and per any requirements the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District might have. Sefwer Issues The property is within the Stubbs Bay Sewer project area, and a very recent inspection of the septic system indicates while no surfacing is occurring there is a clay tile outlet at the creek/ which in 1987 was noted by the previous owner to be a direct laundry discharge. That owner was advised that such a discharge was illegal/ and he agreed to stop that discharge. However, the pipe is still in place and Septic Inspector Steve Weekman is currently investigating whether it has any current function (i.e. footing drains for ground water removal), whether it may be connected to the drainfield, and whether it can be removed. { r • ^ r \ '.i • rr y.: t:h ¥.k Zoning File #1647 June Ilf 1991 Page 4 s:“- >■.» drainfield. There is absolutely no way to meet minimum code standards, and the separation from the water table would suggest that any existing drainfield on the is not providing proper sewage treatment. There Ixkely no visible hydraulic failure because the sandy soils likely allow direct underground flow of effluent to the creek. The point is that the only feasible replacement system is a it. continuance as a substandard lot with structures that have substandard setbacks. On the other hand, unless J^e City is prepared to condemn and redevelop this neighborhood, it may unreasonable to disallow replacement of a detached garage. Staff Re ndation If Planning Commission determines that there is sufficient hardship and justification to grant variances to allow tne proposed detached garage, staff would recommend placement per 2t^\^\%Vb:c%"^Vr"i’./c^rs“;irr‘d^ zone, subject to removal of plastic from all decorative rock e on the property, and approval of a conditional use permit tor work in the flood fringe area, subject to elevation of 935.0’, subject to any further conditions that may be imposed by the Watershed District, and subject to positive removal of any potential septic system discharge conduits. Isv r CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION ftInitial Application Fee $175.00 ($50*00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change trom original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) m A3 ^-7 i • ••S5 rr^v r/:‘nA.»rr . ^ i I C .MUtti/ r.rcrrc 1 4^.11 T7*«^rw >/i A w w' . « • • V C » *- . ' W'A W PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ^YQU Property Identification Nuiober (P.X.D*) Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. ••ca w - . V • V'VIi .v(?i ri].\ 05/riA* APPLICAHT Name GiEfiALD B Phone (home) ^7^ (iB 9Z .... Phone (work) 73 "^ /^^7aL, ST Citf. AJ:A t Up = hO ?££ i (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired - ^7 (month/year) X jdoL (do not) also own the a'Jacent parcels of land. .<1-4NT OSB OF PROPERTY ^ Present Zoning District A / X Present Ose of Property Other (specify) Qif REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost Describe request in detail: S&£ —irtS-VT^^- VARIANCES RBQOZRBD Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances ( X Front Side Rear) V L other QbTR^jK ^ MX tv BB^RDSHIPDescribe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __—-- - - - - - - DESCRIPTION OP ONOSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Foi ' CertifiR^ Property Owners2.wist of owners within 150* (you must obtain 3. 4. S.\l J 7. 8. tKl8"^i^ from Hennepin Cbu ity Department of Finance A-6 03 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8*j”xll“ for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8%"xll"). Sketches or plans of floor 6 elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%"xll"). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other .-persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please resiesiber that vonr variance application is not complete if_the— jmfjMaiatlon hee not been included. mLZCAH«.'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date _ _ _ SIGNATURE [ The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further euthorises reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agei*tSf Cosnnission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner •s Signature ^_ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the Ehird Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all achednled Bwview meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is mable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an luthorised agent attend in your place and to advise the Building s Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ffc,. , j ^** * J I “ <WN OATI OSAif/fl • *BATCH 007 PHOT ADOH CMCfl NAMi TAXPAYCil NAME/ADOB • . •I • • PtOP AOOB OMCR HANI TAHPAYEII NAHi/ADOi A :kIf' . y-;; ♦ M J r SB 0B-I17-B1 11 OOSt 0S40B CASrUICE ST DEIMZS HCOlICCVY D€IMS HCOKCVY ^ MOB i LAKE ST . . LONB LAKE m S5SM r . - . . •* —, '.>'j X’i'i I f ;■ »•; 05-117-t5 IS 0040 ,'0S41S . EASTUKE $T HARY H RASMUSSEN 'NARY RASMUSSEN i S4U EASTLAKE ST ' ; LONO LAKE m > SBSSA • • •» i t PROR AOOR l:fs^v ' t • • '"'iJ ■ ’• f ^ OS-117-tS 14 00S4 KOOOSO ADDRESS UNASSXGNEO OMCR NAME i ESTHER N ADDISON TAXPAYER' . i MRS A L ADDISON NANE/AOOt ‘ I i. 5SDE DAYSXOE RO LONO LAKE IM SSSB4 HEMCPXN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY (RtCRS LIST SO 05-117<23 IS 0035 03407 EASTLAKE ST DAVID C BURNS DAVID C BURNS 3407 EASTLAKE ST LONB LAKE S535A 36 05-117-23 13 0044 03424 EASTLAKE ST T E RAOKE AHA RADKE THOMAS E A MARGARET A RADKE 5424 EASTLAKE ST LONB LAKE »M 55356 SO 05-117-23 14 0035 03SS2 BAYSIDE RD A L ADDISON ETAL MRS A L AODXSON 5502 BAYSIDE RO LONG LAKE MN 55556 hi ■ . *T TAXPAYlt f • I- • * .< “• it VSDvOf-117-SS 14 0057 ;’ i 00050 . ADDRESS UNASSXONEO ESTHER M AODXSON .■ • MRS A L AODXSON : ^ NAME/AOOR 'hSSOt DAYSXOE RO > U ; VLONB LAKE W,-’ BB5M ", \ ■ ' ‘ *M-1' . 'll . ■' 1 ISbI M-U7«n 41 OOtf PBOP ADM ' !^P040B '* CKraHO » r t ' omc D nahb /(;p DaonaoN snan jr etal <■ , hr DEMOSON UR;« JANET SHAN * 40S OKFORO ROAD •>;L0NB lake Ml.; ,'t^j i‘: 50 05-117-25 14 0052 05590 OAYSIOE RO ROOT N A BARBARA HUBER ET AL ROBERT A BARBARA HUBER 5590 DAYSXOE RO LONB LAKE fM 55356 TOTAL BATCH 007 00013 REPORT NO. PX455401 PAGE 14 30 05-117-25 15 0056 03409 EASTLAKE ST ANDREH FLEISCHHACKER AMIREN FLEISCHHACKER 3409 E LAKE ST LONG LAKE m 55356 30 05-117-23 15 0046 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 0 A HONGE ANA MONGE DEAN A A NANCY A MONGE 3444 E LAKE ST S LONG LAKE HN 55356 36 05-117-25 14 0036 00038 ADDRESS UNASSXGNEO ESTHER M ADDISON HRS A L ADDISON 3382 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE N4 55356 38 05-117-23 14 0060 03403 EASTLAKE ST G E A E E BENOIT GERALD E A ELLEN E BENOIT 3403 E LAKE ST LONG LAKE »tl 55356 — -r 1 A a ■ " J "HPi UiiCiO:.. . fv .* t J ^ i J 4 r'w CUxZ^ ex' j2^/M4^ pdiJgX* 7f^ • ■ * •• t, V, S“<^.QaJL '^nJA/u^l^ • - • • *• • -* ••; £>* . *v f‘*v, -i ‘’-. v '. V . . . ■*,•>'. S^J^'*1 \**A'/ ’ * t.,'*" *^S» >»4-'"*.*'* <*• *• •t>V^:• V i. ^ ^ -A • LV! .V . .V 7 t f*<? 'V.-; *0~.v'.k>'^*fi' cu j<Jl£^ezu . ^ ? *.. 7- :v .•, * \*^ .- « H ' % » f ••, • >w** • •. . .• !• *,•*• . • •; •. r . • *. K vit- < A-*r. •V * » » « • ‘•.- - A •■ V. . ►^;f.i. . t-.V; ...'•,. *t. • ^^v>-7 ••:-^vv? / .:v*' :: - / y?f(ij4A^wyi(J ^S% . ‘ •►'V *•: 1 - f *'- # — •.' ■--#4, '. •; * V . » • . 4 . *V'-*’■. w . * * <-•!’ CJ i. J. J. ^ W v/i. w<^»*« V^ «•Gerald E. Benoit-ock 8, Rayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka Hennepin County, Minnesota Str^ opr/oNj £as'^5/. oo --=^.161.470 ^-----. — ---. —. . .TtrTr ; W^ I. • i. I. .w w cl * • w • *-' Gerald C. Bencin ck Sr Rayside Addition Mennepin Coun t•', M in,n.e rz : o L a k e '1 i n n e t o n k a Ota 5IT# ^priof>^'‘8 Sas/take £&s:\ 3Z.1Q Hi; k' oo o f A • \O •n 5i*^«irtaUC. jc^f-xek h'/ifj 1_____» 1' i • <. x> 1 ‘ K* ,(N i..• ••• • •••• • • • • - « •.•W«*^l6l.foO •. . •# •.•• .• ; r-. iV-'. m 1'' 1 i“ 'M i . M- ^3 r-. ‘If*; te ^r.» *' ph" 'I-' [i*^' ./*' 'k.r:. j45v‘“- m,- k*'V\V, ■" ;• :rV ;.‘,r •>■ h:y' t'.;, <«• ■ U9HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET _SETBACK ZCNE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75 75-250 Existing Hardcover in Zone Hill500,^ Lr^'y m A House * • X S • F • A f •• LENGTH WIDTH •^ • •• • • X s .• •♦ • •S.F. ♦ X a S.F. • ••X S.F. •• • • *• m • ■ # X * S.F. fi. Garage « X • S.F. /» riDf\/PUAV X /^.3 . • 442, r . S.F, .• 6 X s •t « ' S.F. ■ Di 1 • • 51 DEWALK Z^3 X S.F.u •. «X a •S.F. • • » X » S.F. e . {Ja«o/■1. . . 4 A . ^X 4.^s S.F. M, ^------ P IANnSCAPE X 4-A =' S2.U S.F. AREAS •« • • - «« »*• UNDERLAIN BY ■ ,• ✓ X a /(f S.F. PLASTIC • • SHEETING X a . S.F. » X •• S.F. • 6. Other •X ««9S?.8'"s.F.• Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone VC^ 7/4^ S.F. S.F. 6 X 100 - /S,± H! % • • 0 ^ • m • • «• •m- #•— f-W” • • .« • • ,^b,yv. -f.■ anrtalimm ■•* ^ IT ■V L; w i *- *b m sH'‘ hT. %c ¥' ti;>: ^>. • >i5%.v>;*. p- 'r . Si- >;■ 1:^.-i. / KTilT,.-. • 4T- - OC^SJCfiTHARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET ..... SETBACK ZONE: Tcircle one) 0-75'(T5^25^ 250-500' 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone .* V.' /.• i rfwu^& •a LENGTH ’ X WIDTH Z(>.z.^59.f .* i • •• X 4.2.^0 .s —• 7 'X .. ^ L Z 4 <3-0 1 fi'S.o • i t • • » • fr» •X , • B.Garage . 27.5" •» S.^X . A.O 35. HP /^/.7 ■ C.D riveway • X . • AM X . • •» *• • { « D.. • • Sidewalk . Z.3 X .6 8 • //.4 { • 2.0 X _j • 3-.r X _Z.o 7 S E*Jatio /D eck 3.Z. 7. S.X _iZ.o • • •3t. 2^ ^l.L s• F.Lanosc AWU • • X _Z.O % ' S3.0 S AREAS UNOERUIN BY >e - X _/.r..zz.^s PLASTIC SHEETING • z X 24 • 8 $ 2 3 A _ X / ^ 2 3 ....... ♦ • • ' « ' 3• /fr/: i4/Mii 6. Other •m * • .63 X .^5 S S9.g s« 7 S.F. S.F, ^‘?V.'2 ^oial JiotA f sS.F.-.^SS S.F. '25L3^^'^^ "* S.F. 4/47 S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F. US.O S.F. . Total Hardcover in Zone ♦ • Total Property Area in Zone 7^27.5 S.F. S.F.B I±All^-r 6 X 100 - ^ • •••••• ..j IfScxS'Stuff sbuf ^a HFfi»Wf€t%^ zsr? itC C^ndfii oFTtcn ^/W-Vs^S" (^0AT70t^ / Slbev^M^. - .C>«x^........... 7 ‘7^.‘? 3‘iO yv /2.S" -790. 9 SIZ • ••• ««•»% «l _£cT<&’AJ<A>C.B.1,2> ro ..7i.W __ /^S' C)76aS-j ^‘I.s (Tnqz-.^*'^ IC^/L.I = S2..-?7>* is.aa.t = E.3.9 /. :K'^^frti^i^CCA,L sV ZSO'SOO I •ZjeK^AA^t>K ; 7/¥9 /<««-. CieisS<. : /^C Ofnof^ /2 2X>3,S 2X>B.2, ......... —1 ’;■ ^<<4^r^€ ^ foitno^j'7 ... .. .3V S/2- _t>eiurvoe(Y £3£,.-y 5'05'i- § >■ ('awx)m 3ro ^ t' ' ' I s lt>^fert^?r.7 7n ? :.ST8oe ____ ___. . 2lC .G . .......ZL.L. •4 " ismj, fmjT.lc,____ _(M'V>(/00,(V> ____ 1tv- - .• % •(^(2.2.9.8^ 1 •' ^1.... ^ i .-ITOW- : 112^ . 2. -/S-.VA * !^&7.‘bs ZO.h7':> • ; r^pnr>'yf 1 A — 2*?£^ F L,- 7 s?—/- - .f KEY TO MAP iOO-Year Fiood Boundars !00-Year Flood Boundary ZONES Zone Desienations* With Date of Identification e.g.. 12/2/74 lo6-Year Flood Boundary fOO-Year Flood Boundary ZONE S' Base Flood Elevation Line V th Elevation In Feet** 573 Base Flood Elevation in Feet Where Uniform Within Zone** (EL 987) Elevation Reference Mark RM7 River Mile • Ml .5 ••Referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum o'” 1929 EXPLANATION OF ZONE DESIGNATIONS !ONE A EXPLANATION Areas of 100-vear flood; base flood elevations and flood hazard factors not determined. Areas of lOO-vear shallow flooding where depths are between one ,1) and three (3) feet; average depths of inundation are shown, but no flood hazard factors arc determined. Areas of 100*\ear shallow flooding where depths are between one (1) and three (3) feet; base flood elevations are shown, but no flood hazard ^actors are determined. A1A30 A99 Areas of 100-vear Hood; base flood eievations and flood hazard factors determined. Areas of 100-year flood to be protected by flood protection system under construction; base flood elevations and flood hazard factors not determined. B C D V Areas between limits of the 100-year flood and 500- year flood; or certain areas subject to ^00-year flood ing with average depths less than one (1) foot or where the contributing drainage area is less than one mile; or areas protected by levees from the base flood, (Medium shadmg) Areas of minimal flooding. (No shading) Areas of undetermined, but possible, flood hazards. Areas of 100-year coastal flood with velocity (wave action): base flood elevations and flood hazard factors not determined. V1V30 Areas of 100-vear coastal flood with velocity (wave action); base flood elevations and flood hazard factors determined. '^LIMITOF DETAILED STUDY WATERTOWN \^Unnamfd Tributary To Stubbs Bay ( A . / L IMIT OF DETAILED SlUDY < CO < h" V) >cco I----------,----------,..- • ZONE A1 IN THIS TO SHOW TO SC AREA TOO NARROW LE AND DOES NOT EXCEED BOUNDARIES DELINEATED. r -iW FI oodway - flood fringe designation NOT ^ruUATED FOR LAKE MINNETONK (SEE TEXT SECTION 4.2) |iv I' h'‘-I- I1^: r im£ ttumeroNKASTUmS BAY lu' fe-' t' sheet flow area V.fc>. ■ t- E‘v ;I y I CITYOFORONO address CODE ___ Ovre Connected to SEPTIC SYSTEM INVENTORY CARD MumciMi •i « J • i ■:1M I 51. 3VQS Symmtypt Permit No. . □ Stondard trench □ Mound □ Ottter ______ »/opertv 1.0. ------L2—m2. / iU 3 Oeti of permit L#oei Deicnption ~ ^YOD^ Intteller •■ tuildHif typo No. or GPD Laundry Dithwmher GerPage OiiPOiaJ WELL DATA ? 2 c *0 Q 5 TJ 5a SCPnC TANKS: MowiN Cepecitv U Liquid depth to RO ie^ i tank bottom ORAINFICLO: Tom liAtil* o# llnrt Tom umnwwt ffM (»o. ft.) Typool flltor momW Trench ^Rndth Hoight of drtioflotd abow. <%owr »6l. Soil typo OlMMP from naoran faMp. Omtti of fMI o«or drainfWd .Til* tia .Pore raw .min/in Depth of rock owr tile under tile m J) mmc 1t E jtcm a•J Eo E O uc 8oa & > a E 3a I • • 001 s i hu € • » •• •< *1 fi 1 INSPECTION RECORD DATE COMPLIANCE PUMPOUT record DATE GALLONS location SKETCH t H prj^<rLMH^ STKSe 11 >Fo/»ia S-r*FA«/A»C. AJcwimt* QOi. •7 V/* 5^ ~iOD •7-gg> /goo 4-IO-V3 ^OO If JX. -o’? A.WAMIC Alerg^ fiem*ro calotte /s , H ►iVArr'W'* ^ ---------------------^ ‘'i___ 4i- cy^&gKT C-CONFORMING S - SUBSTANDARD N - NONCONFORMING Includ.: 1) WtIMocatien 2) Diitanc. frorri houM to leotic tank*, din. box, and dreinfield 3) North errow end roed r * : i* I r • * \ '• 1^:Mayor Peterson & Orono Council MembersJohn R. Gerhardson, Acting City Administrator \ /' Pron: Date; Subject: August 5, 1991 Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning i Zoning Adm #1662 Richard & Collette Roberts, 1937 Fagerness Rd Variance - Resolution \ Soiling District - LR-IC, h sere, severed Application “ Request for lot area and lot width variances to construct a new residence. Lot area is .39 acre or 78% of the required 1/2 acre. Lot width is 74' or 74% of the required 100*. List of Bzhibits - A - Resolution B - Revised House Location and Hardcover Calculations C - Notice of Planning Commission Act'^n 7/15/91 D - Memo & Exhibits of 7/9/91 Discussion Please review the memo and exhibits of July 9th. Briefly, the applicants wish to remove the existing house and cabin on the property, and construct a new home. The original request showed a 50' street setback, with 27.4% hardcover in the 75-250 ’ zone. Applicants were advised that only a 30' front setback is required, and Planning Commission also indicated to applicants that they would have a hard time granting a hardcover variance. Applicants have revised the5r plans to move the house forward to the 30' setback and have therefore been able to reduce proposed hardcover to 24.6% in the 75-250' zc le. Plai king Coanisslon Recoasendation - At their July 15th meeting. Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the lot width and lot area variances subject to limiting 75-250' hardcover to 25.0% sc that no hardcover variance is necessary. Justification for the lot width and lot ?rei= variances is that this lot was platted prior to the current ha"f acre/ICO' area and width requirements, and that a residence currently exists on the property. For the record, lot coverage will be approximately 11% under the current proposal and there is no problem ./ith average lakeshore setback. Applicants have been advised that removal of plastic sheeting underneath the volleyball court in the 0-75' zone and replacement with top soil and sod to make that a non- hardcovered yard area, will not require any additional approvals. Staff RaooaBendatloo - Staff recommends approval per the Planning Commission recommendation. A resc''rn.'.jn is attached for Council review. '/O O.n-VuI !.A %^-v CITYof OROXORESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _______ *-^-v I-r-r ';/■■ ' I si* #■IIf ie If-;-" II I" K-l'^ i' m^i A RBSOLDTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO NDMICIPAL SORING CODE SECTION 10.25, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) FILE #1662 WHEREAS, Richard and Collette Roberts (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 1937 Pagerness Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows; Exhibit A, attached (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of a new single family residence on a lot of 0.39 acres in area and 74’ in width, in the LR-IC zoning district which normally requires 0.50 acres in area and 100* width. HOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1662 2. The property is located in tV.« Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. -1C Sinjle Family 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 15, 1991 and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings: A) A single family residence currently exists on the property. B) The property was originally created via a subdivision which occurred prior to the current minimum lot area and lot width zoning requirements. \\4 w CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ____ I '•r £f ' e; r.i it. ■f-t'' S'V', 1'W. >>• ,;.i ■ ’ , ■h I k- Rfc C) The lot area of 0«39 acre is large enough that a single family residence and associated sidewalks and driveways can be constructed without the need for lot coverage or hardcover variances. The applicants' original plan requested a 2.4% hardcover variance in the 75-250' zoner however the Planning Commission finds no justification for granting a hardcover variance. D) The lot width of 74' will accommodate a single family residence without the need for variances to a side setback requirement. 4. The applicants have revised their initial proposal to conform with the Planning Commission recommendation, and have relocated their residence nearer the road but still meeting the 30* minimum street setback, reducing the square footage of hardcover in the driveway and therefore eliminating the need for a hardcover variance. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City, COHCLDSIOHS, ORDER AMD CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of a single family residence on a lot of 0.39 acre and 74* lot width where lot area normally required is 0.50 acre and lot width normally required is 100', subject to the following conditions: Page 2 of 4 '-.L // I, I ( 01 O s. m CITYof ORONO v\<jMAd/.' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1. Hardcover in the 75-250' zone shall not exceed the normal 25% limit. In the 0-75' zone, applicants shall remove all plastic sheeting hardcover placed by a previous occupant of the property, however, the existing retaining walls in the 0-75’ zone may remain in place. No further approval is required for plastic removal and replacement with topsoil and sod in the 0-75' zone. 2. No other variances are granted with this approval 3. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 12, 1992), 4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of August, 1991. ATTBSTt Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk” Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property 0tmer(8) Page 3 of 4 .Mic I h.. IS' •.M k9t' .: f y- ■ i -H 1.^ fe'R' ^ V‘ > '’ ■'Vf t^:. u-y9P : -'V.^ I'- •(yy 5>^' .a''' Uf-B' W \^.y. y>- I * .^04, fO O CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________ STATE OP MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrximent was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of August, 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson 6 Dorothy M. Hallln, Mayor t City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City, STATE OP MINNESOTA ) Notary Public ) ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described Tn and who executed the foregoing Instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. STATE OP MINNESOTA ) Notary Public )ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) On this _ day of 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing Instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 4 C‘v.'\ r' \n ^ \ t mf 1 . ;.r r-i k I ;•- ■[.:■vo I "Yi [&. m ■MI''.r«. 'H5y?YrO; It fei r-i.r Is Ic • . <nd th<* flCCr**'I on• illow: ijowraenc i at pxiension Souiheaiter: y »? of LOw I9. Fagernesu f Und»»r the linden Avrnue. *a judicial IjniKnjrk: t.nrni:r inums East a distance narittd by a judicial iny Southerly 2I degrees ^ of n feet, more or less ••etonka; thence SouLhw*;st*?rly Minnetonka to its i nterseci i.... sne of said lot 20. extrnuod netonka: thence Northwester i y line of said lot 20. c.xien.i.'ii Under the Linden Avenue: III thrt <..»>itMw»l M L i.. M b- ' iLCULATION WORKSH^ zone : (circle one )_ 0-75 .......pm lIjniiirn T- IN Zone ..-r5C0 SCG-ICCG' * I r k I Hnnss ^0 X t ^0 =. • goSr . LENGTH • • 22-' . .X width = 1~IpH X to'- .. /^/ •• X ♦ • • X S.F. # %. «3. Garage - • • - -2. ^S<D 'O - 50 + 11’ D riveway _!/S^ •» • - K- iy. f > ■ ifc-' -(J' V •’ ■ ';.A T) *- ‘ I 1 Ti Sidewalk ^ _ X _ X 5./$■ Jatio /D eck UNDERLAIN BY *■ *r •*•• •••*• PLASTIC ' SHEETING t • »V .y.. ( G. Other X X X X #% • •••'«^ ** » • ««• • *• S« F • • • S1 F. S.F. S.F. _■ S.F. _ S.r. . S.F. . S.-F, . S.F. . S.F. . S.F. ;s.F.- S.F. * S.F. S..F. - — •S.F. -V. r '■:‘l %' • • .. * • Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone ri iffcoc? 3iMS-*C S.F. S.F.E ■% P •« A « . 1^4^ ise^ feArAj ^ •• •* *• M cm OF OROHO p. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay^ MN 473-7357 ZONING FILE #166255323NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONDate of Notice: 7/16/91TOtRichard & Collette Roberts 1937 Pagerness Point Road Wayzatar MN 55391 COPIES TO: TIPS OF APPLICATION: Variance nm^Op'llBBTING: 7/15/91 VOTE: 7 For 0 Against Planning ConBlssion racoi^cnds the following: Approval subject to conditions noted below ■0TB8 6 SPECIAL CONDITIONS: i. Anoroval of lot width/lot area variances subject to limiting 75-250 hardcover to 25*0%. Please submit a revised site plan showing ow you w accomplish thiSr 10 days prior to the Council meeting. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council Monday* August 12, 1991; meeting starts at 7:00 pjm. ifV.- If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (473-7357). A If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Coi^ission minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the Planning Commission. 'f’v -‘I f':' It- fe 5lv \a-r_ fc. --.■i;-. ■■ #:• rU^ i'- $-iWr mfe-- m: iKV'v -;l.v> V; I?' ■V-i.m.0:- Z^'-4h^a*:-r.i- fcs Tot Chairman Kelly & Planning Commission Members Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Datet Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator July 9, 1991 Sobjectt #1662 Richard & Collette Roberts, 1937 Fagerness Pt Rd Variance - Public Hearing toning District - LR-lC, >5 acre, sewered Brief Description of Project - Applicants proposes to remove existing house and cabin, construct a new home meeting all pertinent setbacks. Variances Requested - Required 1. Lot Area 0.50 ac 2. Lot Width 100' 3. 75-250* Hardcover 25% Existing Proposed 0.39 ac 0.39 ac 74* 74* 14.3% 27.4% Variance 0.11 ac 26' 2.4% Pertinent ordinances - Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) - Lot area/width. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover. Bardships/Dnnsnal Property Conditions as Noted by Applicant - - Existing structure is in disrepair and can't be suitably renovated. — Applicant noted to staff he has been unable to successfully negotiate a purchase of neighboring vacant pi^operty at 1929 Fagerness Point Road (this was subject of a never-completed lot area/width variance in 1987). List of Bsliibits - A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Survey - Existing E - Plan - Proposed F - Plan - Elevation views G - Hardcover Calculat'ons Primary Issues to Consider - 1, Since the applicant has not been able to purchase the adjacent vacant property, is there sufficient hardship shown to grant lot area and width variances for construction of a new residence on applicant's property? Am V . . . m f* Zoning File #1662 July 9, 1991 Page 2 of 2 2. What hardships or unusual property conditions have been presented to justify granting of hardcover variance? Are there specific reasons why a 2.4% hardcover variance should be granted for new construction on this lot when starting from virtually an empty lot situation? Additional Pertinent Facts - 1. A small portion of the rear of the property is in the 250-500' setback zone, and is proposed for no hardcover. 2. In the 0-75' zone, there is extensive existing hardcover resulting from a plastic barrier placed underneath the sand covered volleyball court area. In the hardcover calculation voj^ksheets, applicants indicate that they will be^ removing all hardcover from the 0—75' zone (portions of driveway on the landward side of the road have been calculated as 75- 250* hardcover). The survey suggests that retaining walls in the 0-75' zone probably will remain in place, comprising less than 1% 0-75' hardcover within the property boundaries. 3. Because the adjacent lakeshore property to the east is on the lakeward side of the road, placement of the house will not encroach the average lakeshore setback line. 4. Lot coverage by structures, limited to 15%, will be 11.0% under the current proposal. Options for Planning Coasission Action - 1. Recommend approval of lot area/width and hardcover variances. 2. Recommend approval of lot area/width variances, recommend denial of hardcover variance. 3. Recommend denial of lot area/width and hardcover variai es. 4. Table, requesting applicant to consider revising plans to minimize degree of hardcover variance. 5. Other• /■JO 7-0 2............k. a . . iI CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION i[ Initial Application'Fea $175.00 - , J :F r ($50.00 per each additional vqtfiaace) .1 OFFICE Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 •• iFzj-^^iyOO^ I (no change from original applv^ition.^^-*" ^ Jl i After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) _ _ ___ __ _ _ _'••..hiVA lu'w > : — _ A u' • V •- •- ••. • •' v'l * A-y • 1. PROPERTY LOCATION 06/20, i Site Address_ _ _ _hAC''^£ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ i? Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) f"? * //7 ~ ^ S -^ ^ ~ 00)<^ ^ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --—- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -—- - - - - -—- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - . ~ ~ ^ ~ “ I APPLICAHT ^_ Phone (home) ^.. O A ' Name ^ g Phone (wor)c) |t - - -- - - - - - - - - Address; /^ ^ FeP- r r City: 0 '3ip:_^^_L2_ W (if different than applicant) Phone (home)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ‘iv Name ______________ Phone (work)_________________ i Address: ___________________________City:--------------------------Zip:---------------- S'' /p Date Property Acquired _ _ _^/?>/. ^_ _ _ _ _ _ (month/year) A -I I (do) no^ also own the adjacent parcels of land. I PBBSBHT OSS OF PROPERTY j ^ ;r Present Zoning District ' C-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - Present Use of Property __ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Residential^"^ \/ Other (specify) _ _ _ _ _ ~~ _ _ _I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _1- - - - - - - --- - - - - - - pi DSSCRZPTIOE OF PM(jinMie Estimated Construction Cost $ / M A I- Describe request in detail: DnnrC —0^''J - - - - A Ayg/,^ lA-r>rJ^^_ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ ^ |-M^Ti_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ —__ _»» » » » I Lot Area Lot Width 3^ Hardcover • ?v _ _ _ _ _ _ _ L« Setback Vari^ces _ _ Front _ _ _ Side Rear ) |f Other_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _—. Pi: I. V'ti ■ ■" •ft-': . HARDSHIPDescribe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict ^ ^ { DBSCRXniOH OF UMUSDAL PROPERTY CONDITION^ lue hardship or practical difficulty resultin' enforcement of zoninc regulations; t>sj j'y XSg ^(lPA /yj£» nr> Ij^abt f Oat}'Svu f\ A/jrf ^/Aor Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code^equi rement s: V/f/? !S ACBl 7^ i ) LJ- y r r c c t.^ r r c 2. 3. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS^ 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you ir.jst obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8H"xll" for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8ij"xll"). Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%'’xll"). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 5. IS. 7. 8. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above informetion hae not been included. APPLICANT*S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original " le payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this applxc.ation, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct^to thfe be&t of his/her knowledge. / , ' ' Applicant's Signature V-’ -_ _ _ Date _ c ONNBRS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents# Commission members# and Council members .for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. ) \ ^ Owner's Signature j)at(C Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled xevlew meetings of the Planning Ccmsdsaion and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 6 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ■ '•' * i ■f • ^ «'f' ?'•1 • A *• •1 • , fc '•’b -1 >•'^ -r.•‘:i 4,r 1-' • ' fr . ; f *» • .» i- .1 (•:' '■t.'•; ■*r ’r*?« • * • ;i t U f > Iv' \ ■« ■ < • I > * i> i RUN DATi 05/22/91. V ,{. ■. 8.'.nV A* r’• 13 .^ V *! ’ .1' • fKMj^: |:jj I ■ .l^i . i 17-nr-ts « ooo6, . ; , '*« Bttftfl^AnnA '• A1A9A ■ CT I HE^tlEPlN j.. PROP AOOIt : V 01920 CONCOROXA ST 1(»tCR nahe; (Vjqhn e meist etal ,- TAXPAYER fU JOHN E NEISr 'r >l f;j NAME/ACOR ''1920 CONCOROXA AVE '■ li I »I > H HAYZATA W ' .! ' ! #* 1 '-■ W91 ■li ; ;■ •■?,■ > vT' ■ y: :' sr 17-117-21 2s 0010 PROP AOOR >r.01921 . FAGERNESS. POINT RO , '0»«R NAMB.f, PETERSON A E H PETERSON TAXPAYER. /v> OARRYL L/.PETERSON > , . i 2 • NAHE/AOOR i .1921 FAGERNESS POINT RD S I ' . ' 1 1 NAYEATA HN , 55391 :v:!' ■:[' ; 5 li ^ ,1 . PROP AODR ^ lOHNER NAHE 18' : 1.*-il7-2X 2S.W01B , >‘ 01912 . FACERNESS POINT ro • HARK R PLATT .4 ;!j J • /TAXPAYER, • h' HARK R PLATT *f : '.t. ‘ NAHE/AOOR 1912 FACERNESS POINT RO 1 t ' '“ HAYZATA »tl 4-i, 55391 - I) »' I J-i' ■'?‘IM ■ 17-117-21 21 0018 •' ‘ ' PROP AMR . 01995 ' . FACERNESS POINT RO (M«R NAHE R CENARt^ A 0 NXSKANEN-CENARI¥'TAXPAYER tfVR'fOENARXrA 0 NISKANEN-CENARX name/AODR ^1995 FACERNESS POINT,RO fj &{, i jCHAYZATA Jtl 55191 •'' iph '* 'If^rv 110-117-21 'iV.0^ : PROP AODR ."i^'>19O5;;.';<C0NC0A0XA;S i- A a I 0NNE5 NAK ) TAXPAYER :^^.0l905^i^<t0MC0R0XA^S.^., t ! fijHfA C^BIWLUNDf t-lHtrVf :‘;rr NOmAN TCttffR SEROLUIV) ’»■ :A‘>‘ ♦ j'l lAArAfCIO * nUBTIBW. IKIWUXiR VCiX ^ ^ NAHE/ADDR ^i905 CONCORDIA SI ^r''•i* * *% ‘ t ' ’ * -• -’i ‘ *' >•• ft* m ^ ' I''l/ii .'i ?4,.* CW ‘iry PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PR-TvERTY 0**4ERS LISTla 17-117-25 25 0007 '‘•1058 ADDRESS UNASSIGHED LLOYD H DRAPER LLOYD H DRAPER 901< GIRARD AVE SO MPLS r*. 55919 56 17-117-25 25 0011 Cl 929 EAGERNESS POINT RD LLOYD DRAPER LLOYD H DRAPER 9015 GIRARD AVE SO MPLS 55919 56 17-117-25 25 0016 01929 FACERNESS POINT RO K 1 J DAHLEN FBS MORTGAGE CORP 2910 UNIVERSITY AVE H ST PAUL m 5511** 58 17-117-25 25 0028 00058 ADDRESS UUSSIGNED R GENARI I G NISKANEN-GCNARI R GENARI A 6 NISKANEN GENARI 19<»S FAGERNEfS POINT PO ORONO m 55591 I * (si; ; . I TOTAL BATCH Oil 00015 REPORT NO. PI955901 PAGE 5158 17-117-25 23 0009 01915 EAGERNESS POINT RO DAVID L SLAVIK A HIFE DAVID L SLAVIK 19U EAGERNESS PT RD HAY2ATA MN 55591 50 17-117-25 25 0012 01957 FACERNESS POINT PO W L KLITZKE A 8 J KLITZKE COLLlTIE M KAERCHLR 1057 FAGERNESS POINT RD HAY/ATA t*i 55591 58 17-117-25 25 0017 01990 CONCORDIA ST SUSAN C PETERSON SUSAN C PETERSON 1990 CONCORDIA HAYZATA 174 55591 56 18-117-25 19 0019 0’-925 CONCORDIA SI THOMAS M KONAT THOMAS M KONAT 1925 CONCORDIA ST HAY2A1A 174 55591 p Pi CO • .vr;f<i HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ione ; (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250^ 250-50^: 500-1000' 1' r^. 'f. m ► I' I|r. b'.,- ■ 3^ PPV- t.; i-?/ ifV- % 'fc tl.'. ; r HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSH^E^-:^. SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' (^-250^250-500' Existing Hardcover in Zone zrn_^^r.r.r] ^ ^ 'w W4 » A. House V 2-2- B. Garage ^2^ 3^' t-^o'c. Driveway _ ' D. Sidewalk E. Patio/ Deck ^ "'^CQndscap^ /^!<TTLAND: ^ ARpr UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other X X , 20 LENGTH WIDTH 12- lo 30 5^ / Total Hardcover in Zone !otal Property Area in Zone Soft '2^‘Y iG'-l l^uo 3o ' /VS' 3SZDV S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. /2-,900 S.F. [I B /2.X 100 2.7. % :: HARDCOVe?. CALCULATICN WCF’CHETl h ¥■mi WICTH S. r . r . X X S •. S.P. : "" a S. F. X S. F • r B, GAiSAn? X S.F. ; ;J ' V' • c, DrIVEV<AY ... , 5f S.F.;r X 3 S.F. • n. SrnpwALX X S.F. ;Sf X - S.F. k \ X S.F. #,£. Jatio / D eck X S.F. V? i-. i- •■ 4 Sy>. f :' r ! B.lAMflBrAPP ^*7 X m J3DUS^ S.F. AREAS UNDEHWIH ,-f' ^ ,,/<ST7 S.F. i-- 1 !i !'J . 1# '■t PLASUC , / 7 X ,X>S.F. ....... * X . S.F. [ f-r. • IS. Other ' “ * x"”~_ S.F. fe P _ “"Total 'Hardcover in Zone - • • p • p • S.F. [X i. I'‘1 1, Total Property A rea in Zone ^ - spoo ■ s.,. rn . Floa - -'% • : ! r. ':5v- \' h if-:- h.. Ik iV f s •■’ HARDC3VE?. aiCULATlCN WORKSHET S£T3AC:< ZONE: (CIRCLE cne ) 0-75' 75-250' 25G-500' 5CO-ICGO' I^STIfl^ H ardcsver in Zcne X *2> oA. H ouse 3iA__ LENGTH WIDTH £^rfU >0L1 i± fi/rf'.' c. D riveway In 0. Sidewalk 1 3 E. Patio / D eck 3 s MhML F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY , , PLASTIC SHEETING tf'' G. Other « . *Total Hardcover in Zone - T otal Property Area in Zone I7]7^v ' . 10 ^ 0* S. F1 S.F. 3t:?S«I* • . 3/y,1 S.F. • ^t S.F. 3b S.F. S.r. • S.F. S.F. __ _ 3/ ^S.F. l<T S.F. S.F. - — — - S.F. S.F. • S.F. . S.F. ---------------— S.F.• /ksz-'C S# F • IS, ioo S.F. 2 CQ if ) 1 J i 1 • •• •Sm * * m w — X100 -/Vv?/ % po p HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET . • SETBACK zone: (CIRCLE ONB5"'^0^ 75-25C' 250-500' 500-1000' Hardcover in Zone f ' ; I t { \ p t Ik'' m f • * I' ■r A. House RUSTIC SHEETING G. Other LENGTH WIDTH X X «• • S. F. S.F. S.F. Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property A rea in Zone o ' (9 B 3^^0O X 100 - . S.F. . SrF. . S.F. . S.F. . S.F. o B oy y'O m • •- •• V• ••• • •• Ifr I?. J'’’ ■ : »V. Si\.; t; . • ‘‘-y I h’-'\ K> y I" ^ # ,., r i. ;.* Ik I'-¥■f I'" m ',>•* ■ II W: HARDCQVE?. C;LC’JLATICN liORKSHEzi ^73Ac:< 20N£; (CISCLE CN£)(fc^^ 75-250' SlSTING^RDC3V£5 if| ZCNE 7C,*!-trn'^ o cr,^ / A. H ouse ._ X S • r I «•LEJIGTH WIDTH X =>s. .=. X S. F • m • ‘ • ”‘x . - ... -a _ S.F. X 3 S.F. X S 1 F • o« UAKAue c. D riveway X 9 S.F. X S • S • ■ D. SIDEWAL.K X S S • F • X S.F. X S.F. E. Jatio / D eck X _ _ S.F. ♦ F. Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN ^"7 ' X W'^0L=,5( S.F. /? ' X 9 ///kl S.F. BY ^ «« PLASTIC /? ' X « ^*^0 s.p. . ----------- “' X S.F. Hipueo *""*X -----------—-------------................... S.F. •• Total "H ardcover in Zone « w ♦ # P • B S.F. Total " fProperty A rea in Zone S.F. - (7]_222il_ -r dJlS^— 20tr VUim ^ip- |jp ia * i T t ^— fl CnoM'.l^ 8 COHC. HiOCH 16 * §• COHC fOOI'HC icifH TO rrp Notes f-to, •C lui CO onJiOi riotejQn roo iHi HAa»*c Of noii-ouoipo ■ g P4II4 tu fMIlOOt R J-VII Tirw"|i insn 5?q s I'S' i 7TSc UMtXCAVi -S£2 JHSCS T7* COHC BLOCK 11 ir np NOTtS «-'0) § “r111 BASEMLNT MIH COHC. r\.OOR niRU-OUf W/ 6X6 10 GA 1H M. ,5v. -------1 L- / r' ■ n t---------r4--------— —rr r^=-j _i i COUOSCS •- COHC BIOCK ir* I a * COHC. rooiiHG (atrea :o rtp. hotis « io) 'N la-o*?oo 44 4 • I lOV)V- p t«-90 BASEMENT FOUNDA-!QN PLA.l SCALE. 1/4- = ro” 2*4 TYPICAL fOUMOATlOM •lAM un OCR 4h O olHfi CX4*CiaT14TIJiotioc^ W.W * r.o«S o» Huuo*r uwi» y #4 HCIuMl Oi •IIM * W 4H0 WNlNSlOHl 10 Ort1»iOlC W UwAiu o« fica. 1 BUMS ftAHiiC fOOH 00001*5 tJlH "l* (t) MCHIS *H» •! "*“• •uu poewn or SOLO HASOHtf ■nWCOl fACC Of Tht WALL. AN AUt VOACC or OHf-JJSf U/JL** at THC fOO. IHO AMO lots « i. INC Botca MUSI ywgMOin XiiHlS 00 U04H1IOM COLUai fOiJ. RUNNING VCRIlCALtI THOOMCM A COM^ I. rooiiMCs ARC ;: c*ni« tiyj jjjl lOCALin. AMO SfRCAO fOOTiCI Of . BC PROVK>CO. 7. CO h CRHC IH rOOlMCS >0 SIRCNCTM or HOI POUNDS pea SQUAOC fOOI (Olf J Af I, IN pcim oRcco coHcant [555SL1 fDOC ABOVC IMC ihAN siK (B) ufCHts fca fOomcL I masonry unit rOOTlNCI mow IIW iwct TMC PROXCIIOM OCTM JW ' AHO TMC W10IM SMAU tl MOMIII W.OCR imam IMC wall SUPfOtlCa II lO COMPIIAHCI WITH All TMC I PCRTAIN TO sues. MJfJO^ Of fOUMOAllOM rOOllHCV IHONCSS WAllRPNOOflMG AMO ^BMIRAIRJJ Of MUSI lAKt PMCCIOCNCC OVia Mi 0 RlllNLNCCS ON TIMS PlAfL J Miles 1 lorries Inc. 4700 NATHAN UNII PO BOl OtW M1NM:a I’UU3. MINNI SOTA C5440 N€W HCSK). CITY: 00AWI4 BY: CHCCKCD BY: ■fy:-I;- ^pKt-r';Kv wUaw $'m.: 5#> N:. K: [fe"r" s-i '-•Si? lef:t elevation I' I aTT^J f _, c.f o ')^ ( ^>h REAR ELEVATION SCAIE: 1/8" = rO 1 \ %. •fe W' IH- p: c • ^ t' J^-7 Pr ■'P-I- ^■;>f ■ 'W-'ISt.f- w u I:: rii. 0- Ml'.r< '.HUVFYf.O; ., «nd th<» Arcr>'*iunj *.» • i low: «;owmenc i m <i t ex lens I on Sou Lhea s i.c*r; y <' of Lot 19. Fagerness f Under the LinOcn Avrnue. a judicial lan'lmark; in<'n(.<' I n u t. o s East •! d i s t a n r e marked by a judicial :ng Southerly 2l degrees e of 11 feet, more or i^^ss 'letonka; thence SouLtiwosl^rIy Minnetonka to its i nterseci i 'oe of said Lot 20. extonjoti ’•etonka; Lhence Northwester l y line of said Lot 20. o.'iendoti Under the Linden Avenue; •U the SnuUierly line nf «;.ii.i iii K- p'i’ r: I" %r;' t; I/- ^ • J •. i-» .► .K;V/ *;.' kf.*,' Iv fr; ■'fV.5<;|, ■ '■[ ’*•' sfe To:Mayor Peterson fi Orono Council Members John Gerhardson, Acting City Administrator \ Date: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Admi^jj^tl^o^J^ August St 1991 Subject: #1664 William H. Bookman, 1090 Loma Linda Avenue - Variance - Resolution % Zoning District - LR-IB, single family lakeshore residential, 1 acre, sewered Application - Request for average lakeshore setback, hardcover, and side setback variances to replace former enclosed porch area with open deck. List of Bxhibits A - Resolution B - Notice of Planning Commission Action 7/15/91 C - Memo £ Exhibits of 7/9/91 Diocnssion - Please review the memo and exhibits of July 9th. Briefly, as part of a second story addition project, the applicant had torn off a pre-existing enclosed porch area on the lake side of the house. Within that same pre-existing footprint, he wishes to construct a deck with platform height approximately 24-36" above grader with a railing and small stairway. The deck will be located 8.9* from the side lot line, normally 10* is required. There is a 4* average lakeshore setback encroachment. Hardcover in the 75-250' zone was 32.9% at the beginning of this project. Planning Conoisaioii Recommendation At their July meeting, the Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the requested variances, subject to no increase in hardcover above the pre-existing 32.9%. Planning Commission also responded to the applicant's inquiry about a future garage extension, advising him that such an addition would need to be the subject of a separate future variance application for street setback and changing from non- structural to structural hardcover. Staff RecoasMndatiao Staff recommends approval per the Planning Commission recommendation. A resolution for approval is attached for Council review. ■ w- K ^ 1 ■. rr «•' fe’ |lr^r^rj- ir k • 6 I3t'- ’fe f.' ^ [.: ^ // /■O Ok -CITY of ORONO \\ W RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO._________________ A RBSOLOTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO NONICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1, SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2, AND SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) PILE #1664 WHEREAS, William H. Bockman (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 1090 Loma Linda Avenue within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City ) and legally described as follows: Lot 9, Loma Linda, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property")? and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Sub<^vision to construct a dec)c located nearer the la)ceshore than the defined average lakeshore setbaclc line past which no structural encroachment is normally allowed, and a variance to Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B), to allow such declc to have a side setbac)c of 8.9’ where a side setback of 10' is normally required, and a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to allow hardcover in excess of the 25% normally allowed in the 75-250' zone. HON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1664 2. The property is located in the LR-IB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 15, 1991, and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings: A) The house has only two exits, the second being door which would exit onto the proposed deck. a platform and stairway would be necessary in location for safety purposes due to the grade of the site. Page 1 of 6 ;r 7 r«/ K.p;, • • 1/ ay-I irv o o > v\V w n \ >« A» CITYof ORONO \ Vv RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. B) The original structure was built in 1941 before hardcover or setback laws were enacted. C) The proposed 8'x20* deck will have the exact same footprint as the pre-existing enclosed porch in the same location which was removed as part of the applicant's second story addition project. The applicant always intended to leave the floor jf that removed porch in placer but found it to be in a deteriorated condition and not suitable to remain as a deck. D) Hardcover prior to the recent remodeling project was 32.9% in the 75-250' rone. The small lot size of approximately 0.21 acre in the 1.0 acre LR-IB zoning districtr and the fact that half of the lot area is in the 0*75' zone with 0-75' hardcover being less than 1%. are justifications for granting the proposed hardcover variance. E) The adjacent neighbor to the north will not be significantly affected by the side setback variance since that property is higher in elevation than applicant's property. F) The average lakeshore setback encroachment of 4* has no significant impact on neighboring properties' views of the lakes, and the low-level deck is less of an encroachment than was the pre-existing enclosed porch. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. S'-'/V, 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district^ that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the city. Page 2 of 6 o o •* > W^>• ^^B!8H0^ CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _________________ 1 i.: f f"k- r ' ■ ri I f^,<' •fr itf f:*' k . I.r i i y: (* ■ C0N(3«DSI0NS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above# the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22# Subdivision 1 to allow a 4' average lakeshore setback encroachment where no encroachment is normally allowed# and a variance to Section 10.24# Subdivision 5 (B) to allow a north side setback of 8.9' where a 10’ side setback is normally required# and a variance to Section 10.22# Subdivision 2 to allow 32.9% hardcover in the 75-250' zone where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed# subject to the following conditions: 1. Hardcover in the 75-250' zone is approved at a level of 32,9%* All existing and proposed hardcover approved with this variance approval is recorded in the calculation worksheet and diagram enclosed with this resolution as Page 4. The current property owner and all future owners of this pjfoperty are placed on notice that hardcover shall not be increased above the currently approved level# and any proposed improvements of this property that will result in additional hardcover or a change in nature of hardcover must be approved by the City. Such ap oval m^y re»*bi c in a requirMnent for concurrent equivalent ^ rcxAi^vals of existing hardcover. Al'x existing hardcover scheduled for removal as a condition -'f this resolution must be removed prior to the footing inspection for the new construction. 2. The applicant shall remove the portions of stairway located in the 0-75' zone. A new stairway serving the deck shall be located outside the 0-75’ zone. 3. The proposed deck platform shall be no higher than the main floor level of the house# however# a standard railing may extend above the platform of the deck. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant# but are permissive only and be exercised by application for a building permit i^^bhin one year of the date of Council approval# or this variance will expire on that date (August 12, 1992). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code# shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein# and sh*:ll be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 3 of 6 L-' It ■ I ’■t-F .. P' If?*.W i‘,t;?:('.r' i.-- p’„ m> m> m,r.,.r :>'•ifc I Jfr;'.! m'I #■ sfe #■ h ►*» • -lii:: If: HAROCOVE!) CALCULATION WORKSHI sfTaACK tONt; (CIRCLE 0X6) 0*75 f^75-250 ' 2S0-500' 500*1000' CxtsTiNC H arkovcr in Zone • • • 0 t A. House SO, 3- LCM6TH . X WIDTH - 7f7 S.A. A t 5T •S.F.*.• ••• X _ _m S.F. • • m X m S.F. . X m S.F. # •a. fiARAet c. DniviWAr g2-.2.. 'Z."73 . S.A. B A 1‘Z.. /V.6a . /*75 I.A. C ID * /y . /VO s.r ^ • 0. SiSCWALK 4 X ■S.F. • Ak7A\.X - £ •,X . _■S.F.4 •:♦t. Patio / Dtex 3 . 2-P _. !C,0 l.T. P \ 9 •a .Lanoscapi AAIAS UNOtRLAIH IV X m S.F.•• #X m S«F • %•s ALASriC SMITIM X m S.F.*• •r«X m S.F.•• %On OTNU X m S.F. • 1*.% Total HAascovto T'jTAL P(WA«TV Aoea IN ZONi /^/Z S.F. ^h 'k«IN ZONi VfOO S.A. H] *i *i H /£>(7. .4jT] ^OO . X 100 - 3Z .1 % Page 4 of 6 Vi, I .it ■f i',r » » i’ t'. 'i'a: ' t:' ■• j|-j: I- 'f.:m ife.. t*“- K‘ /^O o A_ % iSi o >• iS CITY of ORONO /' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _ _____ 6. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of August, 1991. ATTEST t Dorothy M. Hallin, city clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property 0«mer(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of August, 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 5 of 6 CITY OF OROHO P. O. Bok 66 Crystal Bay» MH 473-7357 ZONING FILE #1664 55323 NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Notice: 7/16/91 TOs William H. Bockman 1090 Lana Linda Avenue Houndf MN 55364 COPIES TO: TXPB OP APPLICATION: Variance 1^"hf i- n- J:-in I c V'- i ?■ * S'.-; hf- ¥■ . t '•*:v • h DATS OP 7/15/91 VOTE: 7 For 0 Against Planning Comsdlsslon recoamends the following: Approval subject to conditions noted below ■OTBS AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1.Approval of side setback and average lakeshore setback variances to rebuild 8*x20' deck. (Average lakeshore setback variance will allow you to have a railing on the deck.) 2.hardcover in 75—250* zone to 32.9%. Please submit a sketch of how you will accomplish this. 3.Note: when deck stairway is revised# it must be entirely out of the 0-75* setback. 4.Note: Future garage extension to the south might meet the 32.9% hardcover limit, but would still need variances because: A) It doesn't meet the required 30* street lot line setback for garages that open to the street; and B) This would be a change from non-structura1 to structural hardcover# and is considered an intensification of an already excessive hardcover condition. Applicant's next s* heduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council Mooday# August 12# 1991; meeting starts at 7:00 p. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes# they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the Planning Commission. ■ Vv• ■’ A - Ml iiiWiiifell - " ii-"- *.v‘ k, To*Chairman Kelly & Planning Commission Member Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:July 9, 1991 Subject: #1664 William H. Bockman, 1090 Loma Linda Avenue Variance ~ Puolic Hearing Xoning District - LR-IB, single family lakeshore residential, 1 acre# sewered Brief Description of Project - Replace former enclosed porch area wi th open deck Pertinent Ordinances - Section 10.21, Subdivision 1 - Average lakeshore setback. Section 10.22# Subdivision 2 - Hard- .er Section 10.24# Subdivision 5 (B) - Side setback. Variances Requested - 1. Side Setback Required Pre- or Allowed Existing Proposed Variance 8.9 8.9 2. Average Lakeshore 0 Setback Encroachment 3. 75-250’ Hardcover 25%32.9%* ;i3.4%**8.4% Existing at Issuance of 2nd story building permit 5/2/90 (no increase was proposed at that time). Includes nominal sidewalks# retention of old stairway adjacent to deck# new parking apron# replacement of deck. Jtelieant's Statenant of Hardshlp/Onusual Property C<»ditions - 1. Front door exits onto deck. House should have two exits in case of fire. 2, Original structure was built in 1941 before any hardcover (or setback) laws were enforced. List of Bxhlbits - A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Survey E - Construction Plan P - Hardcover Calculations G - Survey/Hardcover Calculations/Staff Review# 1990 Building Permit I- r' r I tC-' «¥:■i I I?I fi V*' ; m.i iM’ Zoning rile #1664 July 9, 1991 Page- 2 of 3 Priaary Issues to Consider - 1.Is there sufficient hardship presented to justify the granting of requested variances? 2.Can the proposal be revised to decrease or eliminate the need for one or more of the requested variances? Pertine:nt Facts - 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. In 1990 applicant determined to add a second story addition to this existing residence. After discussions with staff and Council* applicant revised his addition to be directly above the existing house structure, off-set to meet the required 10* side setback. In conjunction with that addition, he intended to remove a 8*x20' pre-existing screen porch that encroached the average setback, but leave the floor in place as an open deck. Applicant was advised on the approved plan survey that the super si .k.uc Lure of the screen porch could be removed but that the 8*x20' deck would have to remain in order to avoid a variance. After the second story addition was essentially complete, applicant determined that the 8’x20* porch floor was in too poor a condition to keep, and he removed it but left the adjacent stairway. Upon application for a permit to replace the 8*x20* deck, applicant was advised again of the need for variances. The original site plan approved with the second story building permit contained 32.9% existing 75-250* hardcover with no changes proposed. Since the completion of the addition, applicant has removed areas of sidewalk and added a 10*xl4* gravel parking pad to allow a second car to be stored off-street. Although applicant has noted to staff that sidewalks will probably be eliminated or minimized, staff has included 44 s.f. of landing and sidewalk which actually increases hardcover to 33.4% as opposed to 32.9% pre-existing. It seems likely that with revisions in the deck or its access stairway, hardcover could easily be held to the pre-existing 32.9% level. The deck to be replaced will remain the same side setback from the lot line as the pre-exlijting deck/screen porch. Compared to the proposed deck with railing at the first floor level, the pre-existing screened porch probably could be viewed as a more Intense average setback encroachment than this deck. u...Hy 'V c:-- f.-.K!p'- r F ■ i:'- ^-.■ ta Zoning File 11664 July 9, 1991 Page 3 of 3 7.Lot coverage by structures remains at 11.3%» within the required limits. 8.Applicant poured pier footings for the replacement of the deckf but stopped work after being advised that this deck replacement was not included in the permit for the second story addition and needed variances. Planning Coani salon Options for Action -* 3. 4. 5. 1, Recommend approval of side setback/average setback/hardcover variances as requested. 2m Recommend approval of variances subject to no increases above pre-existing 32.9% hardcover. Recommend approval subject to hardcover decrease down to %. Recommend denial. Other. I i •- /'-V *r ^ • *1 » I f • -- - - - - * ■ '\ •V CITY OF OROMO - VARIANCE APPLICATION i!ri H- Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) the—Fact Fees (Double application fee) #1 ’\ i «.4 property location Site Address iMo Um LH Property Identification Number (P.I.D. ) on -ttv rf <■;<<£?,vj? Attach legal description to application if not nc OFFICE — .1 A •»required survey. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ —————— //T "V ///■/“/., V'*Phone < home ) L4^ / H-f __ fj. -f. :‘tr. APPLICMIT Hui. ItyLUM M ■ Brg^/^A<OAJ 175. <?<;■ FZ vt 'ov. "UAiJi’ vr»i Phone fworlc),'ti /Of , vO/ ^i/ ?r 4_ mum. (if different than applicant)Phone (home) i Name Phone (work) i r' Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) 1 (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. 1?; fii.. USB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District *;■Jc:m: i' Present Use of Property l4oH(£Residential Other (specify) 52:^: i;,-ilBSCRIPTIOR or REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $, ccrib. Wt in -letail: pcecM AH^ nih4erA}^/oA)^ P VARIAECBS RJ fevr Lot Area I Setback Variances ( Other Lot Width Front Hardcover Side _ _ Rear) r^% •• i - *.*» BAXUDSBIPDescribe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations: _ _ _ _ _ t\BC< t SiicUlO /a,'C4^ Cp DESCTIPTION OP UHUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: SZi&ihJAL, ^T^UCTlifL^ CtM-S __ figy&iar >U)X ^-AlO OJ^ /h) _ _ _ SUBMITTALSm 1. 2. 3. €• 7. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners wirhin 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (]) copy 8%"xll" for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8W"xll"). Sketches or plana of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8Jj"xll"). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please rOMBber that vonr variance application is not complete if the above «-iti not: bean included. mUCABT'S SIGNATURE Tha applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses inourred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. — Date ^ '2^ -?/ SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackow ledges and agrees to this application and further euthorises reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, •gnats. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion end verification .of this request. Owner • s Signature _____ Date L '"O-O__ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the flanning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled 7-ylna meal Ings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is aaatle to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. fe- \ \ -V . .**. • •gj... . X**' «** **• h ¥ t- I- ¥ s?;v iA- ■ V iri!/ TI i&... )St S % iftijp T>n-iy 1 i \ 'C \ govt lot 4 • -1mm DATi o«/is/fiMTCM Ml » *: \ ‘‘ . .V- i? ^ X •./> • tK \ HilMPXN CCUlTY MO^KTY INfORHATlON SYSTEM PROKRTY (M€RS LIST> TAXPAYill NAME/AOOR •vf » > r ‘•ii :V i Oe>117-tS ts OOM ^ •. OXtM LIMA UNDA AVC ' R f OORLue A‘K J OORLOO ' RXCHARO r a RARfN J OORLOO . leio LIMA LINDA AVt NOUND tM.: S55A4 < ' •' ! V' Hi. I*rmt‘«Ai { i '!<wi OR'iit-in n oooD » » ;■ ( ■ 010R<': UMA'UNOA AVC ONNiR i«ic,;p;a N UaCNUK \ . TANRAVCR JOM« LASCNUK* NAfC/AOOR XOOX UMA.UMIA'a V f :V r ?•*NOUND MS44 i • i < h . ] ^ .h • L .' . IK 1 ' » > }► f oD-ur-ts as ooit >• ' fUSO UMA LINDA .AVC vo^nkitK-,tum/mk f.mLUAN A DOCRtWM :iNILUAN’A<^'DOCKNAN n 1;-' r .^^lllSO UMA*UNOA AV j ; ------------------MSiA ’• i- ' ^ i ,; • • " '* . • .j ;i I; •. • V ^ I . : v7 . >. : ./.* ^ '* ^ ^ , • * t- •; ; : * ikwmm * ^f •' f ’• PROP AOM ; } •- OMSR NAM ^ j ;«.. . 'VAAJMAIDVM «• ' MAMMA . . AM«TANDAVIR NAM/ADRR•'•w Hi. I » * .MTOTAL DATCN,/ E - ' f:.;# •>. ■■ Ml MMD I { f "H i ' •• ’ • *41', ''m• 1: .1 ;• .r\{\ i-T' • ^ ■ i; > j-.I*• V • I 5« OD-m-as as ooor OlOAA LIMA LINDA AVE R r RADUNZ a C H AADUNZ RODERT r RAOUNZ B50S RIVER BLUFF CIR DLOCMZNOTON M 55AS7 *. i SB 08-ii7-as as ooio 01090 LIMA LINDA AVE N N BOCRMAIfl A N L BOCKHATM NILLXAH N B0CKHA7M soaa LIVINBSTON AVE NAYZATA m 55591 SB 0B-iX7<as as ooai ',01119 LIMA LINDA AVE N J a C J POLLARD : NXLLXAM J a CAROL J POLURO • 1119 LOHA LINDA AVE ’ hound m SSSAA report no.PAGE PI9S54011 SB 08-117-as as ooob 01074 LIMA LINDA AVE R K NATTSON ETAL ROGER K MA'.TSON 1074 LOHA LINDA AVE HOUND m 5SSA4 38 08-117>aS as 0011 01098 LOHA LINDA AVE LOUIS HERMAN LOUIS HERMAN 5140 CHOHEN AVE SO BIOS MPLS »94 55414 58 08-117-as as ooaa 01045 LOHA LINDA AVE J a K STRAINING JAMES A STRAINING 1045 LOHA LINO AVE MOUNO HN 55544 ; X CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE • AND TRUE I REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS ; OF THE HEMCPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PRQfERTY TAl^lTXONt TO THE BEST OF HY KNONLEOGE AND BELIEFi W- r. r 4 *:' r I (we) Adjacanc Prccer-7 Owners• ac./1 L ^ ^ J<^ 'Z ^cwxeagesenc .-or-Ji or ‘_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- '- - - IfTrlnt name (s ; ][prinr address] . far the proposed ir.proverr.en-- cr proposed use of the jiave reviewed the pi * ’ also referred to as Land Cse property located at . -- - - - - - Application No.- - - I («el understand that in (are) not askeo *ha Ci-y Council that I (we) am (are) aware of It: r»;:o^v.rent requires Council approval. ' L - /Q - ? Z- - - - - - - Date Property Owner AaiX -- - -— ^ro^rty Owner _ ^.^^^^^a.,.,,.^****#************ 1 (we) of __ _ _ _ _ _ _ (print address] the proposed improvement or proposed use of the tne propo referred to as Land Ose [print naine(s)I have reviewed the plans for property located at _ ,—— Application No. _ __• 1 (tra) understand that in 3p^|otal"tf^thl*pM^ of “»• (ar.) not a.k«l to ^«=l»«-»PP”7-Vcoun;?l^^^^^ I (-e) am (ar.) aware of but merely to confirm '®r the y ^ neighbor'.s project use the Improvament plans and that the propo _ v _ Council approval# ^ j ^ irai^mrty Owner Date property Owner If you hav. «y yout“co»«'«’'to tbt*Bu”lJn/« Sii.^*Offlc.* JriaaaV iS ia% prior to the acheduled ...tin, date. o - o •- .-» • /• CITY of ORONO >« js \ <\ vr MunkipaJ Offices Po9i Office Box 66 Cnsui Bay, Minnoota 55313 '^^resHO^ June 4, 1991 Bill Bockinan 1090 Loma Linda Avenue Mound, MM 55364 Res New Deck Replacing Old Three Season Porch Dear Mr. Bockinan: Several issues have come up in trying to get a permit issued for your deck. First of all, at the time of the permit for your second story addition approval was given to remove the superstructure of Jou^old porch but to leave the deck in place. Mike Gaffron pointed out that a variance would be required for a new deck in that location. When Lyle and I visited the sight you had already torn down the old porch floor and started a new deck. It appeared at first that a new deck might be possible while still meeting average setback distances from the lakeshore. After discussing this with Mike Gaffron, we discovered that your deck does indeed encroach into the average setback area, we 30" high so a railing would not be required. your calculation the driveway had not been included in your hardcover. You have approximately 32%. Thus ® reouired to replace your deck. I would also that a variance will be required if you wish to build a porch on this deck in the future. TIUEPHONE-*T3-r»7 • FAX-I734W10 'M.' lEE' Bill Bocknaxif 1090 Loma Linda Avenue June 1991 Page 2 of 2 Variances are required even to replace existing structures when the existing structures do not meet setback requirements. Hew structures will likely last many years. I am afraid that in trying to hurry the permit approval process to help you get going on your deck we have created some confusion. Please call Mike Gaffron at our office to discuss a variance application. If you have any questions# please call me at 473— 7357. Sin Bruce V^g# Building Inspector BV/tln cci Jeanne Mabusth# Building 6 Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron# Asst Planning 6 Zoning Administrator Lyle Oman# Building Inspector . .g, ^ .xa.,ir.. F r . t h- Certificate of Survey for William H. Bockmann of Lot 9. LOMA LINDA Hennepin County, Minnesota (H*"' Tins ITEM m BEEN MiGROFIlMED r f UJ \;n ill QCu§ X 4c‘Legal Description: Lot 9, LOMA LINDA I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 1^' • JM • > ■pi&i. &k-.i Scale Date 0 1 inch = 30 feet 3-22-90 Iron marker COFFIN & GRONBERG. INC. Note: Bearings shown are basedon an assumed datum. Mark S. Gronberg, Mn.'' Lie. No. 1275F Engineers, Land Surveyors and Planner*. Long Lake, Minnesota ^ .J m.!>• " HARDCOVER CALCULATION HORKSH^ ■ ScTSACK 20NP.: (CIRCI-H ONE) 0-75' (75-2- , E xisting Hardcovs :’ in Zone A. House 30« 3 x ^: 3 7^7 LENGTH WIDTH ^U> t^oUcH 7> 95" X ^ 13 /AJ :^r' Ikl B. Garage __x —L^j i. c. Driveway / ^ ^75 /75^ /i/Mo 0. Sidewalk 0 ^;</sr7M6» ““ $TVf^S ^ X ; E. Patio / D eck F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY , , PLASTIC SHEETING • • -M I • . • - ■ 6. Other Hi Total"Hardcover in Total Properttt A rea in Zone 4 (T}_^fse_ rioo S.F. S • r' • _ S.F. _ S.F. ^ S . f*. _ S.F. _ S.F. . S.F. . S.F. . S.F. . S.F. , S.F. S.F. * S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ^-2-”'5 v; "•vj ” ■' ^ « t% ■T. 9 =tl5 <-l‘loO S.F. I B I ■% '/■ I i r’ :v I rv* ^7- W. i''' Fr' M:! l-v Jr- # ', . r;.y. ,oto 'A V A*.' •* t’V-5;'*- m- V . ii' I '. f me ;.rv'y 4 ^f »i '>U> taK«.•!.L'V •' - , *'<. '.>■ • &; mm - HARDCOVEH CALCXATION^mSHEE? SST3ACX ZONE: (CIRCIE ONE) ( 0-75'^ 75-250 E xisting Hardcover in Zone 250-500' 5CG-1CC0' A. House .X a «• LENGTH WIDTH X 2S X • X -• X - •“•- - 1.Garage .X m c.D riveway X ( X < D. # • Sidewalk .. X •s Cspnc cc\)G^to X /<3 /3 s X _s E.Jatio /D eck _ X s. ' p«Landscape X ■s. AREAS UNDERLAIN BY . X s. PLASTIC SHEETING _ X • • s.; # X S.l• 0. Other X S.F* Total Karocovca in Zone » * • • •• Total Property Area in Zone .« - T*-» . 0 S.F. S.F. S.r . S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S s •f‘ S .f. [U /3 fSVl3(>0 X 100 - .JlVr; I ' ! ' u ,cril<, flllllS I PJ gl Vtood Of Nttura Q Treated Wood STAJF.S ..a^'biser r MW. tread 8" headroom ■' ;";;«rHANDRA;i. REQUIRED ^^Iardr.a>l _____I I?'Ir I f: t * 75 srre yACert 1ficate of Survey for; William II. Bockmann of Lot y. 1.0MA LINDA Hennepin CoutiLy, Minnesota lA is QC O § X liJ o ■ i‘*'' ' i8 I / CITY OF OllONO /< SITEriAH . . GF-Ai'IMolM -U VAITGOVEri* * ni/Dr.w!: M '.MrtROVLn Wlt'.i Ht'./lolON" \7. .t* V A OAT? . ] / /f/.M / >t.r FF?rr»fWsn. / / 9 /i<2yvAoC<?U /i’" T=^o4L /|OTe><k_10 /AJCU^>C:S /5<1/\C< >VCAJT y40I> /u<sv*J ^ /Ki ftSiV" .0 Xk /kt>blTT®^ X 30*^ \ ^ O ' \,/ Legal Description: Lot 9, LOMA l.lNDA Cc>A»n>iTloA/S » fb,.</ot>A?T70AJ tAJOw ui> A MA^lAAfC^ i^'A.C^ TX- / ^ Pce>ot^- strnSA^K. . (Tg^OKi TP f2£fv\oVe SwPeeSTRxirTUt2-<£ d>P 5 -"io* /^ P<-A^Cr I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under 7^ v*. ^1. '■ ‘ 'i': ; •i. » 5 ’4 the laws of the State of Minnesota. Scale : 1 inch = 30 fppi Date 3-22-90 0 Iron marker Note: Bearings shown are lia'.'^don an assumed datum. ,A yjA/UAAiCc'^ . COFFIN } GjtONBESG, INC. _ . S7uron^erg . Hn. <i c. No. 12755 Engineers, Land Surveyors and Plann<»rs tong Lakp. Minnesota l L!v lit . I ferlificalG of Survey ip Wi 1 1 i am II. Bockmann of Lot y, LOMA LINDA nepin County, Minnesota CITY OF OllONOSITf. riAll . ^ 3F.Al)ll';5 PLiN Vhi'fiiovEri*1 • API'FTOVL:t W!i!I Hi:VIoK^NC • (•s eX- i t;i3AEI'i"v/l;0 :i-j \ .r STOfi-1 • ocr/_wit>ei I'sT 7^e>/tL ' £asi^/S’/,.?/ / / / y; > ^nfryy f . . • jit. N<V^*'r n P -'^NP ''.P ^.o\ / / //ocr /AJCS PiACo'f^c<^T y pt;.:.V'7AJ4.S S /■ / .j; / A ^ /Aj /P x. " Ac 'n / \ jCD) I ’ ' V-T/n'o 7 ♦ /, c, f^Ovl/UC^i^T/OAj /tVf^i-ACeMCf^'<’ tAjow ui> /<e€P A V/l^F/Wc'fe c' TX::- sT/Wt^A^lTs / ^ scm2/'^’K . n: Lot 9. toHA I.IHDA issi'^vo a'];',-3 <S<^T i-e.-<\U€r //NJ Pc AC(:t- \ - -—- . -------- —_ that this survey was prepared by me or under my on and that 1 am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under state of Minnesota. ch = 30 feet -90 ma rker & G/T0N(^G, INC. Gronberg. Mn. <T UJ LV^ ,t c A \jAAt. shown are based uined datuiit. No. 12 753 Engineers, Land Surveyors and Plann»^rs Long Lake, Minnesota tti.. 'Cv c v: ■• -.■ . c:-'' .V*• p.v p,--. •.vv -.^.a ..,-v *• ■. VP p-r-'-pp-vv*:- .. ' " ■ --•’:P‘'L‘" p. .'■ ■ ■ • V^P'PN/^VP V-'* ^ -;V / A p ■ • ' ' - P>-" V '' ''ilf>'-:v :M■pf.pSIliiii^ . ^ V®p''i4p''®p-:, AP: -r •v PPP v 1:P p V aP:p ^^ . V -.:-. ppP^'-pp^-LP-; ‘v’ .pv P l. A;n,;p^«:ffipiippPP#PP'p#PPiP:PV■'2 PV'P A vi . ga .• CBi^ i.70R cmCE OSZ ONLIfPDIOS8 OR laCAt OBSCRIPnOHi----- ,T7>, ----- ~ ANt:.< -no/O CS>ovc^ «r^lT7.VJ; DBSCRIPTIOH OF ROFXl ^ hJ^—^TaA3. ■L.Wr.-V^Vv'V.P;V‘PpPiui )wwt/\t« AnrK.rn!i * Tiy 7^ - : /■:'■'■ .' . . V , - ^ •P-. *'®;aE' :.' P'oP./ V'"' ’ ‘i- .'.^1 ZOUW «*»,ii|iii ■■ Bpiipiy'RgyxgwB^i __________ > —' DATS APPROVSO* .DATS APPR0VSPl_P*^**‘^O DATSi, ' ■ —---------------- ..•■'■'.V'-PPV , 'pilj ■ .,vA4 •' •______" Ak .n a ------------ ---------------- --------------- !!!^S!.L»f!?7^r=r==.-=^ l,TO BS CSAROSDic.pv / ■ .' V- 90____- ■.» I + REVISM •. '.■•' Y: '.VC'' • *P—y A * -m. i w w A ** V\7 V' “ ‘^'P *ii P'.y'VP' v‘ ^ ■ »fTr ■■.••, y ' Vil p ^ P-.-VVAj '• t y* ;\* PERMIT ■•> ?w PI.AM’' •jU*’2-' Lvi**-'• yP , STATS surcharge v «*j:L ‘ SrWER CONNECTIOM WATER CONNECTION PARK FEE SITE INSPECTION OTHER {iFacify) . i; myym ■#?'r ■ . -y ■>:>>) yr,-,0my.‘-y *', Zonln? DHtricti A ^ ,.r" /u<v>fe. SCHOOL 01.Artct.jn£iii^_ :: *r«..liki2_i£- ---- survey Sabmlttadi T«»PJ1 N«---- Su./«yt srSK-- ’■'• .-................ A.1 <"^ ' Left <^tdai /O-Z-------■a—(Street) 1..,;^ ^ v?V^ V PP'Pii, J y 'i ■pp ‘ A' -.,gSSc;. Sv;v v' :^P'r* ^■r P Vpi (Street) I—mr’'^ —- ^ ll.rdco».ri 0-7S' yOo CH*MC.e 7J.JJ0' •2Z.‘>% B«tdeo»«t VAtlMM B.qulr.dl *••---- 6r.dln,. «.« »PPro«l D.t..^2jO£i£;; >V By IS.ptloi staff Approve! Dtfi,, ----- ----— A - «di..4 ^ •— Reeolution *«., " ~Zoning Fi!e»>.jr ■— AJO CMAtaC-.® -/^t<bi090 /i pNT7<<vy^vf^ Mo y Date of Council Approve.. 1, — *;•• Lyy council Approval Datai, • I'y^Myp yuy.y: . /- .■; Reeolution Oatatj^ <ia botiaa)i fee- . A . ^ i*:pr. p-'i P •-p.:» - V.'., -/ P.V'"’7:>*^'- v-.',‘' ,..>VV’'---''V-■ 'V' = t yy^y.y .■ y..-yv-A.'.y.v-*Lr ".y;;' Vv.V^ .*^■ *7 > iVt'pP P^P'.VV - v>v. • V Jrtfc^At^tavaa rfiMiii^lfca^lifsliiiil ^i■il 1 \ i ii i it ,' Lp-.- •.;* •■'• ■ L- . ' '♦ , yyyy:y.y .A ■>/'•■ " y,y;eP r\ ->v ■ L‘>...... tf •pvPyp ..r.p-.P:;v.y*:y;:---' ppPP^^^v ‘■■' ' ' ■ . :. .yrjy:y-■ • ■■■■ ;v^yssyy ^y ■ . " W:i^y yyyM00yy^ ~<>m yy WMymmm t>.y.;... •■ :::yy.yy w y‘;L.P^fi-yp:'my ■yvP-VP.V.P' .y.L-ivyti;■y\ t\ . . • i r ^ -r*. ^ - • »; w Slfw- . < ■ • v> ■ ■ • l*J '■:'ur-\--’-x4*^' ' ■ r*S'‘'» . Vi V *. 1 ^ 1 \ i*/.M / y CITY OF C ^ SflEPLAN • XAp?Roveo>f~~, C APPROVED IV.TH fi , V I OATE_l<^-g:?n S.cvi^ ,^D,n«>v> ^r^c^n. CF Jrr f'VACi«>ic*^r o/= /iCitk/p, 2_rJC* ^,0 X ^o,^ lCO«l'D<?scrjpUon: Lot 9. lOMA LINDA f>U^ rtfc«,ft.4r^ I hereby certify iliat this iurvey was prep/r^^b)T or *under and that I ara a duly Registered Land Surve the law!, of the Slate of Kinnesoia ’ , H ':•■'•'■• Seal*' Date 0 . - u . . . • .' . . Noir:: : ! Inch r 30 f.et : 3-22-90 : Iron narter R^^orings ifiown ar«: ho*.*'^d on an assumed datum. INC. f: a rTb C r 0 n b r~rH hT^ Engineers, Land Surveyo Long Lake, Minnesota., . ... W'\^ : ' ■# :vi >-vv-*Vvv;^-.v . * • < % - ■. ■. • • • >- r .. • 4^ •■ ; Lv. &•' ■ te;,.. ^ • • >, I ^ - -r'.' Wi i > ' ~ 'm.i-. ■ ' ' *'■■ '.■■•' ■: . : */ ■ .; >*■'' , • V,.. ,■ '«vv'C.* •' -!'j| l".;'.■<•,• .'•;•'■( '•• -•V.■ ..>• /•iV''.*’ ", J ■"• - ’'v;: :rir-vt -vrh'' A-'i»V VrvVV: -• - - . V ' . i‘'’ tr f ;v I ' N.* • " —-------- , * ' ^ • . * 1. • *iirwAv •—. . ! •■" AITt/ Af» ifcakjk** ... I •.urvey .., ckmann !' LINDA . Innesota . *. 4.* V , CIIT OF ORONO r SS-IF ” "MSBNSco^,o., 0AT£__i!.-SEZ A ^•i.‘ r . «»■ %•. » • f-' •*• • ^ 2Sicvi^ At>in«^ <i'AJty I‘‘- j- OP }n- A^/*.^nrA,o« , Ifv lyo/jni. (‘itrA •' W //vJ .. 4;*1 T :•,{ . ' *p . ■' v:^^- £Of^T70AtS •. ^ it^O£4:r^T i^uu^ i; / ^A^AAiCt tue TO /*•»■ flUo* aTB4c»t, /T') ’-*>V—-^OP- TO Pw«*c./C jM^«p^nti4.cTWC^ OP ^K^o rcgtu^g^4r^Av t» iy^cp /"/4ce <r f»:criACtiivu.»^T-^ Pt-cp Afri'<- y was prepar«^a by nc or under ny _ . .j ^a duly Registered Land Surveyor under A. ;, ,-.,iv ■■ • V i-* LINDA pmi^A^ON^G. INC.- i •i- V - .•. •n »“♦S/U ^PCr/iMh/^^HARDCOVER CALCmATIOj HORKSHEET 3-29-fo SETBACK zone; (CIRCLE'cne)^0^75^ 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone A. ‘ H ouse 1 S.F. LENGTH WIDTH -4j*•*< r - • A VK. Mk| « . ■>•. i. .. .. . 1* - ■;. -. ..U'J.J- . . -*: , «• > » f . . • .. •*' » ----------•- -.V ■ ----------S. F ^, j.- ^ ' f ;• *. • i — 5»r • ; • ■• ' A ••• r "b .'^Oaracb ’ «. ' S • *t ff > *-•?«• f. • ' • V ^ ^ ’ > V.T*. 1‘c .a D riveway :ii^L_Lfv.P. ?», h 0.. Sidewalk j. ;. -fcV^'-w CViu<. Cc /vla :/j*» ’ % E. Patio/ Deck -S.F f • • * ^ • ^’ * V.^: .* ■ k;- t'vj ^ " • %r ’# ‘ •!;. H' ^•* ^*2 '•'• ■:•, .,:-Av<r - ' ;r m. r: A.', '.-‘tk- F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY . . PLASTIC SHEETING ' '• • 'L ' *-*"SeP# .t-. S.F. • . ..>v.-v.j« c. Other Z^^c// _ ^ Total Hardcover in Zone ‘L Property Area in Zone 2«3 . ... -.yzm -• •; ■•’■^ • ■. < -; 1.; r ^ . . «*-,•• j»*V, . r,.^- I.Fi ZO 0 X 100 - a. -% fW . ^ I ■* u/i • •• (M»•«•• «[M -• .^f»rrA • . . . - - fT j r n. ... **. ^ JCr r*<i ‘v*w»-‘W>" ■'■. >'A - - *• •.% • t-p,-r V rn'- ■'. .'^, -r V, ’A*I -4 V *. . . .<-V ,• HARDCOVER CALCUWTION HORKSH^500-1000'1 S.FSiP *- v ‘; /p. :>^V;rf 1- SiPt • - - r. ' O •M • % >—■■"V*3iri. . % i. _l_L_’s.p.'’ * '.1# *< .X’ ’V ' • « • ‘ * % • t S.Fi * *'• -H.** ^ . ■ ^. V" ■ » O . .. . :.?5i:siJ5i im- . •' * ^ . -vfrv^ <g. Vj^ ;r,.A ^ » - .. .4^ ■ . *■ .-^v-Av * . ' -TVi^ A- *‘ * LENGTH7.^5 >/cr _______ .5iri *. 9*^ *T'i'zV^■ is •''vs __________ X ________■---------Z1—iliiltSiife';; -^• “ -■ V viv;^ •%rTl'< ' ^ „ Jl *fT*; *-««S !♦• - ■ »•••♦ • • .■;'- , '■ *L'> < f . i.. - *•••» ^ - • ‘ t« . < ••» ■ -,1 t BS.1*^ *»»^noiLcuav 12^' X / 7 » '-g ** , 1., * -— 3»r» , , ^. , t •> -•j^i-,'-t«.';^ •»’ 0.. Sidewalk _ Si Pi V*’ S.P •'• ‘ *'«< .v^»¥ ’- V t V/t> “ r . • -V^'-. '..VA •;■■•»■'.■ .;^X ’at 10/ D eck • • 5.F. ',r. .vv .-1^* V I F.Landscape AREAS underlain BY . . plastic SHEETING • , ... •• .. . •w v^ •-....-’y *;.>.w:.,;vp ."4’CJS t*: •••.,.■* a•V * G. Other Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone rc^' 3 V?^£7 . t .*-■* • •.- »w - -•.•>•>' : ' .'-ICt -• * • . V ■■•v.Ti __ . -V r- m -i ' if /^ ^QQ ■ ^ / w ;V^® . 32.,9 % ^*fao i.p B .T';' • »• I '.A ■ • ■ -V* • .. p‘» i"* - . k r.r Mayor Peterson & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson \ * y o.7 From: Date: Subject c \ Jeanne A. Mabusthr Building & Zoning Administrator July 1, 1991 ^ % % #1665 Thomas McCarthy - 1424 Ealdur Park Road - Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IC Total Area = 8,894 s.f. or .204 acres List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I - Application •1 - Applicant's Addendum - Property Owners List - Plat Map - Photos - Elevations - Survey - Existing Site Plan - Hardcover Fact Sheets - Proposed Site Plan Description of Request Applicant seeks hardcover (75-250' setback area) and street setback variances for a 20' x 17.3 addition to the existing detached garage. The replacement of an existing lakeshore deck at approximately 29' 4" x 7' will require approval of hardcover (0-75' setback area) and lakeshore setback variances. Applicant also proposes approximately 227 s.f. of structural overhang/roof at a 5' width and 7' height placed over 143.85 s.f. of non- structural sidewalk hardcover resulting in additional hardcover of 83.15 s.f. Review Exhibit I. The overhang/roof connects principal residence to detached garage. Pertinent Ordlnance- 1.Replacement of existing deck. (check this section # not clear on tape) a. Section 10.22, Subd. 1 (B) - Lakeshore setback variance Required * 75' Proposed “ 60' Variance =15' or 20% b.Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Hardcover 0-75' Area = 3,769 s.f. Allowed “ 0 Existing = 316.15 s.f. or 8.39% Proposed = 316.15 s.f. or 8.39% _ J r I' ll- - * t , /-U h- l: ,V : Zoning File #1665 July 1, 1991 Page 2 2.Addition to existing detached garage (20' x 17.33'). a. Section 10.25, Subd. 6(B) Required = 30' Existing = 3' Proposed = 9' Variance =21' or 70% b.Section 10.22, SuLl. 2 - Hardcover variance within 75- 250' setback area Allowed = 2,223.5 s.f. or 25% Existing = 2,408 s.f.* or 47% Proposed = 2,003.6 s.f. or 39.1% or Proposed = 2,086.75 s.f. or 40.7% (depe 'ing on Planning Commission's final determination concerning connecting overhang roof structure connecting detached deck with house) * Does not include landscape area underlain with deteriorating plastic. Staff has been advised that applicant will remove prior to Planning Commission meeting. Staff will reconfirm prior to meeting. APPLICANT'S HARDSHIP STATEMENT - PLEASE REVIEW EXHIBIT A-1 Street Setback for Detached Garage Addition 1.Substandard lot area and lot width at 50' requires doors to face road causing need for 30' setback. 2.Need to add addition for parking of two cars garage serves for parking only one vehicle. Existing 3.Separation setback would have been required between principal structure and detached garage if 30' setback was met. 4, 20" hardwood tree is being protected by not bringing garage closer to house. Hardcover Variance - 75-250' Zone 1. 2. Lot is severly substandard. Current improvement proposal will result in a reduction of approximately 8% of hardcover within the 75-250' setback area. --d »—kM Zoning File #1665 July 1, 1991 Page 3 Hardcover Variance within 0-75* Setback Area and Lakeshore Setback 1.Narrow lot width prohibits installation of deck along side yards of lot. 2.Portions of lakeshore side of principal structure and total deck lie within 0-75' setback zone. 2. No expansion of deck area is proposed, only replacement of existing deck. Zoning File #1665 Page 4 Additional Comments and Planning C i.ugust It 1991 lission Recommendation - Additional Exhibits - J K L M N 0 P Amended Proposal - Planning Commission Meeting 7/15/91 Planning Commission Action Notice Table - Comparing Alternatives for Improvement and Impact on Hardcover Prepared by Applicant's Consultant Existing Layout and Hardcover Scheme K, Current Proposal Scheme B, Proposed New Detached Two-car Garage Scheme C, Matching Addition to Existing Garage 14'x24' Applicant's consultant, Michial Mularoni, discussed the various options considered by property owner for the expansion of the garage. Mularoni noted that an expansion to the north side of the garage would be objectionable to the adjacent property owner as existing garage is only 1*1-2' from the side lot line. All other expansion proposals involve greater hardcover or the removal of the existing 20" tree that the owner wishes to preserve. At the Planning Commission meeting of July 15th, the applicant amended the original plan by removing the proposed overhang that would have connected the principal structure with the proposed detached garage resulting in an overall reduction in the 75-250' setback area hardcover, as follows: Allowed = 2,223.5 s.f. or 25% Existing = 2,408 s.f. or 47% Proposed w/Overhang = 2,086.75 s.f. or 40.7% Proposed w/Amended Plan = 2,003.25 s.f. or 39.08% Total Reduction = 404.75 s.f. or 7.9% The majority position of the Planning Commission held that the applicant had not demonstrated sufficient hardship to allow the increase in structural hardcover over existing non-structural hardcover excesses. The majority felt that the addition was too ambitious noting that the central portion of the addition was used for an entrance to the property. Mularoni noted that if access walk was not provided via the entral location with the addition to the garage, that a sidewalk would have to be provided from the parking area along the west side of the garage (review Exhibits O and P, Schemes B and C). Hardcover can be reduced by incorporating walking in more centralized location within street yard. The minority opinion found the proposal to be acceptable based on the overall reduction of hardcover within the 75-250' setback area at almost 8% and the fact that in Minnesota the average homeowner needs a two-car garage. L. Zoning File #1665 August 1, 1991 Page 5 The minority opinion concurred with Mularoni that other alternatives appeared to have a negative impact on the hardcover. In the action notice, staff advised Mularoni that if other alternatives had been considered by his client, that he should provide graphic demonstrations of these other plans and their impact upon hardcover within the 75~250' setback area. Mularoni has provided two additional schemes for development (Exhibits 0 and P) for Council's review. Scheme A is the current proposal, Scheme B involves the building of a new detached garage 24'x24' that would no longer be placed within the substandard side setback area and would result in the removal of the * “se and an overall reduction in hardcover of 242 s.f. or 4.7%. i’he hardcover excesses result from the need to expand the sidewal?; along the west and north sides of the detached garage. Scheme C proposes an equal sized addition 14'xl4' to existing garage resulting in a more severe substandard setback to the street. Note that the major reduction in hardcover as it applies to all three schemes involves removal of the gravel parking area adjacent to the roadway at an existing 849 s.f. Applicant contends that the additional family car will now be kept in the stall. Scheme A would provide an additional parking stall on site because of the offset of the addition. Scheme B will provide two parking stalls on site. Scheme C results in no available parking on site. Council Action - Provide conceptual direction to staff to prepare the appropriate resolution for action at the Council meeting of August 26, 1991. Options are as follows: Adopt the Planning Commission recommendation approving replacement of deck within 0-75' setback and deny current proposal for a 17'4"x20' addition to the existing garage; or Approve application as proposed based on the reduction of hardcover within the 75-250' setback area to ensure preservation of mature tree within street yard; or Refer back to Planning Commission if current proposal is not approved and applicant wishes to present an amended plan. nCITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION <■■ I / Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) •J r I :'\T^ ,‘‘Z U A ' ' *-'* 1 ♦ w t ! t L .; ••••*•- 1. W'» I - U *- , ' r V A •-•i-1 ^ —— ta.’ » . V ! hrX ‘i- • vrff*?.:v:vr-;.‘fAv,N M'i/..r;c:- PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address / V ^ ^ c-. ^.-v. i-* •-' iiLl ar < Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) '/H ' —r?/ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. I APPLICANT Neune Phone (home) (^) V) ^ ^ ^ V d y________ Phone (wor)c) — Addrpss: an Park Cecity: (Oroloo____ Zip:_5S_3^ Phone (home) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (wor)c) Address: Date Property Acquired _ _ _ _ _ City: Lh Ni Zip: (month/year) 7 present ose op property ! P 1 a Present Zoning District L \k~ / C- Present Ose of Property ^^^ReTid^ntia]^ Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail:_ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - --- -;——- - - - --- - - Estimated Construction Cost $ 3 ^ (5) cc>»^s't‘^ltc4' ^y/'sf'^ c/^c|c <Kr<a,/*ii 0-7^ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other _ _ _ ____. Lot Width Front Hardcover Side X'' Rear) T I 11II Tt I ' kM I. ^^^DeLribe undue hardship or practical diffi^ultv resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; ScV <L /<rrey_--------------------- DESCRIPTION OP ONUSDAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS ^ •.u "< *.,. — * nT*“v*^ntincr copoliance with ^oninoDescribe unusual property co^. dr^icns pre/enti..g compx-auu Code Requirements : gcTTc^chcfl ----!< rr<£.--------------------------—--------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS Certified Pr^^erty^ Owners List of owners within 150' (you mus __ __ A # . *•« I ^ X ¥2. obtain Govt Center 3. 4. S. 6. 7- 8. this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance h 348-3271). ^ r;S^7"rii=rnse-. =u.ve,o., .o inctuae hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy xll TopographirLurvey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8^ xll ). S)cetches or plans of floor & elevation views (prov .e 1 As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. remember that your v ariance application Is not complete if the above information has not b^-tn included^ ____________ ““"a'^Icanf^^by agrees to provide all information required or reouested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay adoitional fees (st ttm^ not cLered by origi.nal fee payment) and/or consultant = Jn^rred irreview of this%pplicat-:on, and certifies that the information supplied is true and corre« to the best,iof hi^er jcnowledge. Applicant's Signatur ^Date ^/^f / If T ' t OWNERS SIGNATURE ^ . a.-__f=iiT-+-h#ar The owner hereby acJcowledges and agrees to this app . ication au^horrzes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner * s Signature Date V A/ AppiicInVmust’hI7e'7ll submittals into tfce City offices 25 days before the PlLnin, commission Meeting. Planning Commission Office of this change prior to the meeting. •us^biiiaBiaMe. r 1 I'*- ii ■ ■ 9,- fimp r-y^ >-*^-^ O ^ '■■ ^ T E S June 19, 1991 UUH Z 6 1931- City Council Members Planning Commission Members City Staff of Oi^ono RE: 1424 Baldur Park Road, Crystal Bay North Arm of Lake Minnetonka, VARIANCE REQUESTS Variance to Build Garage within 30' Required Setback The hardship and description of unusual property conditions are due to the following: 1. 2. 3. 4. Extremely small lot and lot width of 50' requires the garage door to face the road causing the need for 30' setback. Desire to add the ability to park two cars indoors. If we maintained a 30' setback and a 20' depth on the garage, we would require a setback variance from the house. A 20" hardwood tree is being protected and preserved by not sliding the garage back any further. Approximately 80% of the "root zone airation" is being maintained wit', this proposal. Hardcover Varience. 75* to 250' Zone The hardship and description of unusual property conditions are due to the following: 1.The existing lot is small. Even though the existing house ?nd accessory buildings are very modest in size and n* •jlasiic sheeting or fabric has been used or proposed, the "Hard.Lve?*" is currently 47%. This proposal will reduce that ration t.* 39.1% by removing and incorporating the exist'ng "rock" parking surface and sidewalk. Approximately 405 sq. ft. of sidewalk and parking surface is being removed and landscaped. The remaining sidewalks west of the existing single car garage will be incorporated under the "new roof". The new drive will be bituminous. fh-f M I C H I A ARCHITECT 5 &PLANNING consultants 7650 Correll Blvd. • Suite 300 • '.Voodbory MN 55125 • (612)731 2831 ^Meu.AI ■ f: i:fi; & City Count11 Members Planning Commission Members City Staff of Orono June 19, 1991 // A Page Two . . uo Hardcover Variance. 0-75' Zone for Ceck Reconstruction The hardship and practical difficulty and unusual property conditions for this hardcover variance are as follows: 1, 2. The lot width does not allow for the deck to be relocated to one side or the other. This existing amenity already totally lies within the 0-75' zone and there is nothing to be done to change this. 3.The request is to reconstruct a wood deck level with the finish floor over the exact existing deck area which is now one step below the finish floor of the house. The existing deck area is in disrepair and uneven. All of these above issues would result in undue hardship or practical difficulty if strict enforcement of the zonincj regulations were imposed. Also, the unusual property conditions noted above prevent compliance with zoning code requirements. Thank you for consideration of these applications for variance. Michial Mularoni, Architect Tom McCarthy, Owner Mr * n T. RUN DATE 06/19/91 BATCH 001 PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP AODR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR . 1.^ i HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 0HT4ERS LIST 38 08-117-23 34 0013 01424 BALDUR PARK RD GARY G YINGER GARY 6 YINGER 1424 BALDUR PARK ROAD KAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 34 0016 01412 BALDUR PARK RO C C HAGFORS t K E HAGFORS CURTIS C HAGFORS 1412 BALDUR PARK RD MAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 34 0029 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING SERVICES ESTATE OF EDHARD SPINDLER C/O URKIN> HOFFMAN, DALY 7900 XERXES AVE S SUITE 1500 BLOOMINGTON HN 55431 38 08-117-23 43 0005 01440 BALDUR PARK RP GORDON H TAMCE HR GORDON H TANKE 1440 BALDUR PARK RD HAYZATA m 55391 38 08-117-23 43 0009 03520 NORTH SHORE DR DAVID A SINGER DAVID A SINGER 3520 NORTH SHORE OR HAYZATA m 55391 . I. I f TOTAL BATCH 001 00015 rl » • 1 I • »• 38 08-117-23 34 0014 01420 BALDUR PARK RD H R WITTMER ASK HITTMER HALTER R A SHARON K HITTMER 1420 BALDUR PARK RD HAYZATA M4 55591 38 08-117-25 34 0025 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED EDWARD H SPINDLER ESTATE OF EDWARD SPINDLER C/O LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY 7900 XERXES AVE S SUITE 1500 BLOOMINGTON MN 55431 38 08-117-23 34 0030 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING SERVICES ESTATE OF EDWARD SPINDLER C/O LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY 7900 XERXES AVE S SUITE 1500 BLOOMINGTON MN 55431 38 08-117-23 43 0006 01436 BALDUR PARK RD HAP NELSON WALLACE E NELSON 6221 WASHBURN AVE S MPIS M4 55425 38 08-117-23 43 0010 03530 • NORTH SHORE OR AJ ACKERHANN ETAL A J ACKERMA^84 3530 NORTH SHORE DR HAYZATA m 55391 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE ;i i*. 38 08-117-23 34 0015 01416 BALDUR PARK RD J C ULKU RUBY E A JOHN C ULKU 1416 BALDUR PARK RD HAYZATA 55391 J • J I » 38 08-117-23 34 0028 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO PUBLIC ACCOUNTING SERVICES ESTATE OF EDHARD SPINDLER C/O LARKIN. HOFFMAN, DALY 7900 XERXES AVE S SUITE 1500 BLOOMINGTON 55431 r H 38 08-117-23 34 0059 01428 BALDUR PARK RD G A H ROTH GUENTHER R ROTH 4603 ELLERDALE RD MI^t4ET0NCA MN 55343 » I 38 08-117-23 43 0007 01432 BALDUR PARK RD J G A M R NYQUIST JOHN G A MAUREEN R NYQUIST 1432 BALDUR PARK RD HAYZATA MN 55391 ♦ ‘ 38 08-117-23 43 0011 03540 NORTH SHORE OR - DOLORES M PETTIPIECE DOLORES M PETTIPIECE 3540 NORTHSHORE DR HAYZATA m 55391 A.• .* ^‘■1 y V • •4 • L‘. P* % L’i-'-'-♦ • ^ t •«• • • . f ■ • ^ J • . t A* .• f 9 k ■ *• ^i • i ••: ; ,* « J .«V •. t *• 1*j' *4 ' m V / •. i- V • * •1 « i ■ * » • 1 r V* ' if • 0 1 ‘ • . . il r; ^ i'i* 1 j ." *? 1RUN DATE 06/19/91 BATCH 001 !•- { • ^ «. '•1' . ; ’ '■ ' . i' :!■U • .' • ■ I' - ^ ::j i |"'i' f •I HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI455401 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BE OF HY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE .i: < • Si <• WRTH ARM ' . • 1 • . w Jl ’yi 0r^ *>. ^47 -1% si;.^ ~ ‘DO l« *• •.'■ • • nV/Vf 4 "* ■ •'ITS ■5'^ - V<=- - •. or • V • -T' ^ V •> Y'' “'•' t %• ■ C^- ' ■•■•tl *'.• -c; r4 ^ ■=V-->'--?ifs '-^' • *7^ X- • SL* ^ • • ‘-wN^ . • -*^'"5|-^. -.Vi; ,*» >l39Nl^*^i JLA )T.<V n-ri NORTH ELEVATION A1 / Sc.1 /4" 1 ’-O’ y- •••••# \ SATHnE-ncncQUisT. ituc. \) f lAtt ¥«Af I Al* «iVi3 • WAVtAlA. MCI itSAt miPMOMI llf-Aft-OtAA • CAif PrcporcfJ for: Slonlcy Sorensen Proiect jQf^ McCnrthy Residence 1424 Baldur Park Road Crystal Bry, Minnesota bheei Tale •Piojeci ^a-•»#< site plan *««< - I**** m ••• r xlsting conditions 9 10 6.1 • •“ • •■• •• • «» .«(• U»«HtiOTA g « 1 7 » Q 1 ame • U»T»1 tf T613)942-S202 • C«««• • < • I C I » •H J ••• • • ball • ICO • <* »•€»••»Ti ;» • ••; .• n i HARDCOVER CALCULATIONJOBKSHEET ScTBACX zone: (CIBCLS 75-250 ' 250-5C0' 500-1C0O' Existing Hardcover in Zone A.House ^ B. Garage c. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/ Deck F.Landscape areas UNDERLAIN BY , . PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other LENGTH 2 9. // . X X Total Hardcover in Zone 4^^5-c>.2S'x 7 5"^ Total Property Area in Zone Fb /S 27-5 S.F. WIDTH 9 X . S"/:’/S.F. S.F. • S.F. a S.F. a - —S.F. ^ n —S.F.•u.•—CJ —S.F. S.F. o ///S.F. *f 94 S.F. ^ O ^S.F. S.F. • a S.F. S.F. 14 at /5"4 S.F. Zone S.F. N Zone ^.7 C 7 S.F. R ^ 76 7 X inn = 7 ? / i . .1 ... 21 '-fr 1 ^ I z,., B 9/2o _ _ _» f. HAPDCOVE?, CALCL'UTION '(.0RK:.nc5J----- ■ . ^ '^zn>J oc.-. cpn' cpn^tnrO'e; (circle cme) 0-/y (/--25cy ^>,-5oJ --J —J K StlT3AC:< ZONE Existing H ardcover i.i Zone proposed cr Existing ^ 5. F. A. H ouse B, Garage LENGTH X . X WIDTH • X X Y . Zo. _ - A , \7-3J 346. .fo X .\±-?41 .<il 14.2. \j t'} ti X 3 ss ' f?--1 ? -Y ^ >2- - y V s.r. S.F. s.y. S.F. S.P. n Sidewalk 37.Cr7 X __3.5: F<l0rtrsT»«P &MA6en®dP r-<» 4.0 X 4.£> « -A ^3 ^ *4. V ^ a./5*xa X E.»ATI0/ Deck X / j/.ar ?-_f S.F-ZS". o 1(0. ■ S.F. S.P.if S.F. F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING --0 •• S.F. X __ X ___ __S.F. __ S.F. S.F Q. Other . X S.F. Total H aru Cover in Zone -2.C)03‘^_ S.F. Total Property Area in Zone S.F I 5‘.lZ5~>oSj 13Proi^ttfed A — ___ ^ ■ ? < c&. o X 100 3^.1 Exi.^t«ng /oO __ % f/o 19 Ifi^**■ - /<CITY OP ORONO P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 473-7357 55323 ZONING FILE #1665 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Notice: July 25, 1991 TO: Thomas L. McCarthy 1424 Baldur Park Road Orono, MN 55331 COPIES TO:Michial Mularoni 7650 Currell Blvd. Suite #300 Woodbury, MN 55125 TYPE OP APPLICATION; Variance DATE OP MEETING: July 15, 1991 MOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: VOTE: 5 For 2 Against The Planning Commission recommended denial based on the finding that applicant had not provided sufficient or acceptable hardships. The minority opinion of 2 felt the applicationJjiouId have been approved because of the overall reduction of hardcover of 8% within the 75-250' setback area and that a 2-car garage is needed in Minnesota. As we discussed on the phone, staff appreciated your comments during the review that you have explored other options regarding an addition to the garage on this severely limited property. You were advised to provide sketches of the other alternatives discussed at the meeting and to reflect the hardcover increases resulting from proposed improvements. If you plan to submit additional supportive information for your client, please see that it is submitted to this office no later than Monday, August 5, 1991. Staff will present your application as amended excluding the overhang area which now eliminates the issue of access to the well and reduces hardcover within the 75-250' setback area. Please contact my office (Jeanne Mabusth - 473-7357) if you have any further questions concerning this application and my comments above. Isv ^0^ If MICHIAL • MULARONI A S S O r I V T t S ALTERNATIVES t <CO eooz III m III t LUzz. H ULI 2 III LUs III IE ii 1LU X LU X iU X DATA stjtiarc led X LU ow o (/) o CO Total Hardcover Area 1447 1057 1205 1097 Garage Area 344 C02 57G 672 Parking Area 049 193 364 144 Sidewalk Area 254 102 265 201 Total Hardcover Reduction \/ 390 242 350 20"'Irce lo Be Removed y no yes no Demo Existing Garage |r\no yes rni>r only MICHIAL ARCHITECTS r L A N N I N C C ONSLILTANTS 7AS0 Currell Blvd. • Suite 300 • Woodbury NtN 55125 • (612) 731 2831 L V EXISTIIslO existing deck ai ea existing house I I I I I I m I m I I i m I m I I I ALILRNA nVI-S DA'rA^\. • .* > 1 B •< Ul 2 Ul Zo to •e• tel 2 UJzoU) 6 O a Ui 2 Ul Zo«n Total Mtrdcover Ar««M4T 1057 1205 109/ Galago Af«a 344 G02 576 672 Parkinij Aroa M?193 364 144 Sidewalk At9»7%4 187 265 2St I'olul Hardcover Reduction \/390 242 350 2(TTrcc lo Be Removed no yes no Demo Exisiini* Garage /\no yes mw4 •M>ir v'!' .. . *:V'v I-- I I < *; lil b llll. ex/ating park Ing (rock) , • ..X.--.' ^ ‘ V*. \ I! \ f.eo; '''■ i . ■-’’x- ? f ">. I / \ // ' ORT^ -----------------------------------------------------y> i«»' Isle Boulevard hf i N I r % •• ^ I I 00cr> ALILKNAHVliS t«|u««r Ur« 1 5 •<• lil 2 UJ I O «a a • M 2 Ul Xu lA to• M 2uJ Xo «A Tulal llaiJcovvr A(«a 1447 1057 1205 1097 Garag* Araa 344 002 570 072 Paikm«j Araa 64^193 304 144 StOaMaU Araa 2^4 102 205 201 luuil lljidcovcr Kcdiiclioii 390 242 350 20*^1 ICC Id Be Removed no yes no Demo Exi^iiiiR Gurar.c /\no yes mUf \ fAwcmCf e X1:ting gar age RLS NO \i! \ ' l . 6267 yl —*r* „A.50.00’ 17'-4^ Isle Boulevard iLi. L., 9 riVE EMOVE EXISTING 20" HARI ‘WOOD TFEE & STUMP REMOVE EXISTING WALkI AND PARKING AREA AND REPLACt WITH NEVy SOD 302 sqft REDUCTION IN HARDCOVER HHHI RLS No. 6267 •\ / / fill ■^1 05 CT» AU liRNAl IVliS DA I A t4|MMc lcr« i SCHEME *A* 1n» Ul 2 Ul LI b• feU 2 UJ Xo¥t Totjl M«f Jcovvf Af««1447K>07 1205 1007 344 002 570 672 Pafkiiiy Ar«fc lUO ID 3 364 144 Sidvwalk Ar«»2S4 102 2C5 201 lolal llaidcuvcf KcducUon \/300 24 2 3S0 20^licc To Dc Removed no yes no Demo liiii* Garai;c /\no yes !««»( »U«lf REMQVE EXISTING GARAGE ANO| PARKING SURFACE AND REP^CE WITH NEW SOD 189 sq.ft.||||^^H REDUCTION IN HARDCOVER.^^1 ORTI 50.00' 24'-0* 28'-0' 10'- ;■ Isle Boulevard -'y i ..r. .lr^i-u**»*frrv* ; 'V'-. I I au I 7 I I I I 8 I REMOVE EXISTING WALKj AND PAMKING area and replace v/ith new sod 117 '.q ft REDUCTION In| H A R D c O V E R ULS No. 6267 o -V • # I I s ■^l ! . COcr» 5 I i I ■ i.. pt£sa5Xt TO*n Ex4Sn ____________________ w«|| CO J DATA li(t4Mr led 1i, •<• 'ut 2 lU I VI •a• Mi 2 tij I OV) b• tel 2 Ui Xu %n lolal iUiUcu«*t Atma U47 io:»7 120!>1007 Gat»ij0 Af«a 344 G83 570 672 I Parking Aiaa 103 3G4 144 1 V ItidcMaik Araa 2S4 102 3GS 201 Iu C jI lljidcjvcr RcducUon 390 2*12 350 20^rrcc 'lo r»c Removed X no yes no Demo Cxi’kiinj’ C.ir.i|*c /\no yes ♦mif e xlsting garage I // r ORTH \ / 50.00'28*-0* 32-a* 2-6- Isle Boulevard t- * - . . ■ ..j r To: From: Date: Subject Mayor Peterson and City Council John Gerhardson, Acting City Administrator \ C Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator August 1, 1991 #1397 & 1487 Art Center of Minnesota, 2180 North Shore Dr - Subdivision of Lot Line Rearrangement Approved by City 6/12/89 Issue - Review Exhibits A, C and K. The Art Center has terminated the lease with Marty Schneider, owner of the former Hill School property (Exhibit K, Sheet 1; Parcels A and B). Since the subdivision of a lot line rearrangement of June 19, 1989, the Hill School property has continued to be used by the Art Center. Now that the school use is no longer proposed, Mr. Schneider is responsible for seeing that all required improvements set forth in the developer's agreement and the resolution of final subdivision approval have been satisfied (refer to Exhit its B and C). In dealing with staff on completing the required improvements, many questions were raised as to the true intent of the City as Schneider contends some of staff's directives are not cited in the official documents of the City. Mr. Schneider now seeks clarification concerning what required improvements were expected of the Art Center in the City's approval of the subdivision application. List of Exhibits ~ A - Schneider's Letter of 7/31/91 B - Developer's Agreement C - Termination of Lease/Use of Hill School Property by Art Center D - Cook's Letter E - Staff Memo Application #1397 F - Action Notice, Planning Commission & Council G ~ Executive DirCxtor of Art Center Letter 6/2/89 H - Planning Commission Minutes 4/17/89 I - Council Minutes 6/12/89 J - Resolution 2639, Approved 6/12/89 K - Final Approved Plans Referred to in Developer's Agreement Please refer to Exhibit K, Sheet ]. the areas of concern. has designated Area 1 located on the Art Center property is still being used as a driveway and parking area for deliveries and pickup adjacent to an existing dumpster. Final plan approved by the Council shows no parking areas or graveled drives and suggests a grassed area. If a driveway is necessary to provide access to the dumpster at that end of the building, the site plan should be amended providing access to the east end of the building. Thure should be no need for permanent parking. Zoning File #1397 August 7, 1991 Page 2 of 4 Area 2 - Schneider has installed landscaping and fencing along the north boundary of the property as required. The type of fencing used is considered by staff to be ten.porary in nature. Staff understood in the original review that permanent fencing was to be installed along the north line adjacent to the existing parking area. As for the fencing that has been extended along the west lot line, Schneider has asked to keep the existing gravel drive along the north border of the property b cause this is where he plans to install a detached garage and access drive. Temporary fencing was a means to p»rovide a barrier to the Art Center traffic via the old access drive. Schneider was asked to provide a written request with a deadline for installation of the garage. In light of the many other issues raised during staff's review of the required improvements, Schneider has since been advised that the issue should now be aadressed by the Council. Please note there was no landscape schedule or plan that called for a specific sized evergreen, but defined merely the type of tree. Area 3 - This is the area of the gravel access drive to the Art Center. If this remains as the permanent access to the residential site, the cutu cut must be trimmed Luck to a width of 20 feet at Briar Street. ‘Schneider may wish to keep this area for off site parking, if so a 10 foot setback is required from side lot li''''s (north and west). The setback area should Immediately be restored to a grassed area. Area 4 ~ In reviewing t' exhibits of staff memos and notices to the app leant, it v s clearly the intent to remove parking areas that were locateu ^.n t' • equired yard areas. In fact the final plans approved by th* ^y do not designate the existing gravel parking area, nor thu access drive along the rth side of the Hill School property. Mr. Schneider should be advised that landscaping does not refer only to plantings of trees but to sodding and seeding activities also. Staff Review Connnents - Staff can confirm that the required parking improvements tor the Art Canter property (addition f 10 stalls), has been fulfilled. Mr. Schneider has uad the xight standard removed from the residential property and relocated within the Art center s northeast parking lot. The lighting should be provided with appropriate shielding as requested by the Engineer in his report (Exhibit D). The City Engineer's report calls for a minimum 22' width curb cut and brush along the fence line tiimmed to provide adequate sight distance when entering Briar Street from northeast parking lot of Art Center. !: Zoning File #3^97 August 1, 1991 Page 3 of 4 In the review of the {.revious memos, action notices, minutes and resolution, staff would recommend that the fencing along the nor-* ’ i ne be permanent. Cook has recommended a chain link fence. reviewing Exhibit K, it would appear that there was no consideration given t-' ^ite planning for future residential use. If a decached garage planned within the north portion of the Hill School property as suggested by Schneider, the curb cut at Briar Street cannot exceed a 20' width. The final site plan shows no gravel parking area along the east side of the old Hill School building. It wa*: . understanding that this was also to be removed. Certain members of c. . juncil who were present during the review of the subdivision u^^plication in 1989 may remember the discussion as to type and amount of security to be posted with the City. A $5,000 cashiers check was specially approved by Council (refer to Exhibit I). The required improvements were known to be well in excess of the $5,000 security. After much persuasion and discussion at that final Council meeting, the City Council agreed to accept merely a $5,000 cashier check. Review of Issues - 1. Need to provide access to east side of the Art Center structure, providing access to dumpster and area for '^.loading of delivery vehicles. The area cannot provide adequate room for both parking and access drive. 2. Issue of temporary vs. permanent fencing. Is current temporary fencing acce^-ta’ In? or should permanent fencing be provided along north i 'i line? 3. Gravel drive that encroaches northern portion of residential property to be closed off. Options; A. Maintain temporary fencing along west property line until garage and access drive are installed. Schneider must then provide a letter of intent to construct detached garage within a period of less than a year. B. Narrow curb cut at Briar Street to 20' and restore ground cover along drive. Remove gravel area within 10 feet nf west and norch property lines. The remaining gravel area can be used for off site parking - no need for letter from Schneider and temporary fence alo " west let line rem^ ved. i. & ■■X * •' ■-v ■«■ r3:.. % % t.fe: Z'€ I •m Zoning File #1397 August 1, 1991 Page 4 of 4 C. Require immediate removal of gravel drive and restoration of disturbed area. 4.Parking area along the east side of former Hill School structure* Options: A. To require immediate removal; or B. To remain until residential use is restored on property but to be removed prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy for residential occupancy. Options of Action Available to Council - reo Adopt series of options set forth above or adopt staff unendation set forth in City Engineer's report, Exhibit O; or reci • tl h« Refer back to the Planning Commission for further review and endation to Council. m&.. ... 0 oncF C5C:;0 n M •= iT^ 1 ^3 To: City Council of Orono 1335 Brown Road South Crystal Bay MN 55323 U '-=Ji-=> AUG 1 1991 From: Marty Schneider 1235 Hunter Dr. Medina MN 55391 Re: Developei’s agreement.JULY 31, 195.. Dear Council, I request to be placed on your next available agenda to clarify a few questions regarding implementation of the attached developer's agreement. This agreement concerns a subdivision made in 1989 that split 2180 N. Shore drive (commonly known as the Old Hill Schoolhouse) from the parcel owned by the Art Center of Minnesota. Thank you for your time. Marty Schneider (Cover page of developer's agreement attached for reference) cc: eSM, ICR. AES. // CITY C? GRONO HEjraESIN COOIITY, HnRJESOTA developeb -s agkeemeit fob r - - V ci C r 3 r.c Cccu:r.er.“ Focm ?,d'' 13 S'— 10/37 Arc Gsncer oi: Minnesota (Saae of Development) err r^nesr of 3ca.-d, ec a. “ (Name of Developer) ^ V c ^• into cnis -no----------- this AGSESMENT. Made anc batwean tha Cicy or Orono, a ’‘^^0 ' “Y ,-,r Minnesota —__________—^-----^^’ZT-r^d under the laws or — ___ munic^oal corporation organ - rant-- -^r » •—' ' muiuc.p -ailed ’’City*'), and ' ^ 'IT^ad -De va loper“ ) .(hereenarter caixeu i ^,^c^c"s, (hersinartar cai--o lea heirs, successors anc ass-g-s, WITNESSETH; ^ l has --de aoolication to the City ^ WHEREAS, Che Deve-ocer has ..- tor approval of a.^ached survey copy, . , 1 ;enr!.;caDL-q and fencing per cxuvai-ritv-required lanoscapi-.M " ^ Sty 3^0 zonir.c £Ue .U9, ■ -.e the City Council has granted approval for m«n WH£B£AS# the uiwj Antiar into this ag^ developmene on the '~^^^“t^rori»provea..nts hereinafter describ«l on to provide for the set forth. l..\.r-s «.d condition, h.reanafter HOW. THEREFORE, in =%«^„"“,V/ron«in\"d, U i« hereby ..rood „t»al pro-ia« «>d conditions hereinafter « dollo-a: . initials of initials of City Clerfc^tfiC^ _ ^nr . on FT P.- f'-tfe Civ/ of Oronc Cocuiner.t Form Revised 10/37 CITY OP ORONO HENNEPIN COONTY, MINNESOTA DEVELOPER’S AGREEMENT FOR Art Center of Minnesota (Name of Development) Art Center of I^mesot.^ 3cara, et al) (Name of Developer) Kf i ■ h- THIS AGKESMEHT. Made^ and Vbe”aen\\e cTty of^rtno" --------------------------------rrr^aanized under the laws of the State ot Minnesota municipal "City^, and --rt- renrer o -'- -^nri-n- (hereinafter called City ----fha-*si nafte^ called "developer ). its heirs, successors and assigns, (hereina..e- ca WITNESSETH: HHBKEAS. the Developer has nade application to the City Council for approval of A ^onninc oer taie attached surv ’ey copy, City-t«juired landscapin? a^ fencing per City of Orono zoning fii.e ifl->-'' *HD, HttMEAS, the City aVra~«nt the terms and conditions hereinafter set or ■OH, TBBEBFOBE, in ccn«in\*'d“ ^ satual promises and conditions as follows: * Initials of Developefg ^?W^ Initials of City Anno Stover, Dcecutive Director, on Page 1 of 6 oehalf of Art Center et al •V •f ft'1^/ L. ^ ni-ion- Tax ^arce^ 33-41310-5210: S 459 teez of E 474.5 feet -ad ..d p^cela :0-42520-7=CO. 3500, 3000, 9500: Lots 2,3,4,5, S 6, Block j, r!ar,^/ille 4-e. In ac''0’""ance with the policies and ordinances of and c^nnd.Uons .,«.nn..en contained : 1. Ten parking stalls 2. Natural evergrean ar.d Janti.ua ainn, t^e of the nortiieast parking area .sec a„-aa.— —^ • oians* The following described derailed plans and 3. ruction Plans^ Th - .nation of the Improvements shall specification* for the ccmpl--- approval of the City prior to be submitted by the Deve op specifications shall conform the start of construction. “„pj.%able work, to all currrent City standards for all appii Per city requirenBnts ■nnatruction or ------ , Com.enc.ment Pete - The construction of Improvements .hall than in rtn r —-i-'-'na nf nf r.<d pnnp..an|. ‘"Tiunr^^r"^ ^ —-------------------------TnitielS of if City C1^J?K ^ Be later shall be later. Initials Initials Page 2 of piA- I I y/ ^ V •r’. rt"l r 1^'rr I Hi'*-' r Cant-actors - The Developer shall select, retain ana ^u = e^°^s; the Contra = ;or(s) responsible for I.oprovement super/ise reserves the right to require construotio . .u-c"ssful experience and adequate r^'tl:rs«;ur: ‘any Tch contractor.- Where required by City City. Preconstruction Conference - Prior the start of any /OotlL the Developer and the Developer's Contractor shall construction, the De 9 to review construction meat with the responsible Ci-y of.ic.ai plans and schedules. ,, - Pr’or to the stara of any construction, the E. PermiwS P - ,nnlv ^o- and receive all necessary jurisdiction. S' Cons*ru-*ion - The construction, installation and materials l^all b^IOa’ccordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City. c. insurance T J- nVOOaOOt^^ i:::r««%eOerage including Workmen's Compensation. Liability and Proparty Damage. we vnr the Durooses of assuring to the City5. Performance Deposit^ For ti p . ta the t--ms of this that ti\ 1 oa'y all claims for work don. fum^hed the -eloper^- rirvt:b\‘e the City at the time of the providing that the letter of credit in a form in ita sole discretion City is able to draw upon »“«*> -eveloper fails to satisfactorily to complete the loprovemen s specified in Section 4 complete the work prior j»oosit shall not be reduced beforeabove. The amount of such deposit shall not substantial completion of Ipi^fi.^ in section 4 above, or no sooner than ,Prri1 3(1. 1330-- - - Whichever is later. Initials of Devel Initials City Cl' Page 3 of 6 ir/fi j c The Develcser acrrses tc pay all City fees completely reimbu a-^o’-ovai the Imorovements<«. <«r.Mrs in re<?ard to the review and app^ova- c. tn .It incurs in reyaj. j ri^v -'av-o'^1 and overhead,L-r r.' .r .-a tfav.3-;:: ^ 1 afTT-ooc “3 be bound by thet p‘T*"V' Dev0loD6r agrees wj ^ in^ resolutions o£ the City Council epptovin, Sr the Development. • j- rff-r*-- The t<^^s and crovisions hereof shall be binding 8. Bindino Cn.^^t of the heirs, nep re sente trves , upon and inur- wO he-eto. References herein to ifthe^ir.:^ h^^o7^°"sutetehr/urchssers e'n. enc.hrencers of all or any part of the property. aar»“.'nont it shall be required or 9. Notices:, Whenever in t.h^ by either parny to permitteo that notice ® such notice or demand shall this agreement to or on the o ■ P united States certified mail be delivered personally or mailed below. Such "p:r«“n‘al" 0" dt=s^-ed in the mail .n aooordanoe with the above. WQtice to City City o£ Orono Cl«rk/Adrainistrator p.O. Box 66 Cryatal Bay, MN 55323 Mrhf--irp to Develcce^ \nue_oh /ll Art Center of Minnesota 4-^ chnrha r'-rvy-a.- VJayzata, 55391 10. Teeamorati on hv Reference^^^JV! 1^ jumishad proposals, specifications an co ' ^ ^ hereby are made a part and let pursuant to this \\‘“j’*rs«t out Lrein in full, of this agreement by reference as fully as it J-ZA~) Initials of Devel initials of City Clerk^'jm Page 4 of 6 r t-' ¥' ti •■f5;r \ ixV '~ ■:- - - 11 Discla'n=rbvCitvj. r. is understood and agread that the City, 11- Dxscia^n^_ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _of the City shall notT _ ,„Z.ard t'""® ac ? :t3 and employeesthe City Counc--» ♦ *•- ••-ia io anv manr'' * to the Develocer or he personally - “!.^,"„“:«orl .ateriai'.en. laborers, or any r ft"; or' c:rp;ration. for any debt, =lai.t. denand, LmHar ao-^ons, or causes of action of any krnc or character, damages, ac..ons, -veout-on o' this acreenent or thearising out of or by reason of the execut.on o. tnis . performance and completion of the Improvements , _ , ^s oa +•-T on • The Develooer shall indemnifynaeiai wan-nles3 and Indemnification. me ue . 12. Hold Cil^ Council, and the agents and and hold harmless t * >,-4. ,ii claims damages, losses or employees of which the City, City Council and expenses, including - -- suffer or fcr which it may be agents and employees of ,,, assertion against held liable, ligations in consequence of the them of any claims, >1 peve'ooer, its employees, agents performance of this ‘^r®' ; ^3,i3ed in pert by a party or subcontractors, wnetner or indemnified hereunder. if 7*. Ddfaul** bv the Develccer of any of the terms - rth« :trr\t^\:nVl^^u^Ttr'tht^crty Vn co-n-^eotlon Vlth the property included in this development. . r*^ i^s scsnts flind i*tsa The Developer hereby grants to ...e C-.y, . .-..-ific .mploye.s, ^Vg%r"V=L?et?ng ^ *'»”*'* purpose of construe—,g . , „j,t complete those upon improvements should the Develope. n taprovements by the date specified in Section 4-S. r* ^he C®tv under this Section shall be 8. The remedies remedies to which the City may bein addition to any other remeaies entitled by law or other agreement. Initials of Develo Initials of City Cle Page 5 of 6 IS HITSESS WHEREOF, th. City and written „r.«..nt to be duly executed =n the day ana year frrs. above arrt.-n. In Presence of: ''tv. c t n<: U, f' S'--for Administration. );■' Data: Igc-I ■r V* & I k r*- (' : • ft- y--- -if:0- '■■i 0' Wk ■ ■ . r^;- - 'by CITY OF ORONO .,. Jhi ii (Maijbr) / / j. j:s± ^(^tv Clerk) det /elcper »/y Bv: -/XO By: (City official) Page 6 of 6 Ml Mil ten Mi—II wTl^r?iTiiniiiy71 iUte Bank -r^v- £■;'*‘•rtr 'tTB5c-ic——v5rTTur»ioiqQIBIMTayzata N. A*"' ’*•••••• •^0*>*f9 to •*>**• *0*4» rr»fK<wHk -162830MWSSJffThe Dank Wayzatn N.A. PAVlOlHC July 2fi unoEn or City of Orono 19 I s 89 76-984/910 1 • 0 . CASHIER’S CHECK .4. ■*i62a3o>’ •:o<uooiB>.s>: qq .r • :«v ^ ^ **5,000.00** DOLLARS 1«*0S • •• ^ ■ ••►nr rz^nriT. I* ‘I V ;v. / V ., ‘f’.' W- !' t|. »,- ■ ■ lh‘ ii':i.- w 4'? ,, [yr ■ ..’ ;i _ • a'. '.'vV fV'.; ■■'r, r'f . r;.'- i- • r'r. '■/ ■ ■ ►[: Ti^nnlnaclon or Lease o ■-ScpteihL»cr i 1 . " e Re; Termination of lease dated August I5th 1989 between Murcln 8. Schneider and Andrea E. Schneider -LESSORS- and The Art Center of Mlnne.^ota (currently known as the Minnetonka Center for the Art:*) -TENANT-. ^ r Address of leased property: 2180 N.Shore Drive, Orono, MN (Hill School/Cencer East). The above referenced lease shall be effectively terminated between the above listed lessors and tenant subject to the following terms and conditions being fulfilled. - - - - - - - - - - - - 1) The Hinneto payments as September 1 October 1 November I ;e J The Minnetonka Center for the Arcs shall assign or otherwise release, convey, or pay the lessors-SCHNEIDER- the 15,000.00 performance bond which *..> at present being held by ch City of Orono. SCHNEIDER will, following assignment of this bond, agree to perform the terms of the developers agreement between The Art Center of Minnesota and the City of Urono with respect to the above property relating to subdivision. 3) The Minnetonka Center for the Arcs' undersigned representatives verify c.iac the MCA board of directors is aware and in agreement with this document. A) The lifelong tennis court lease between Schneider and The Minnetonka Carter for the Arcs as stipulated in original purhase agreement remains in force. S) No other provisions or stipulations or side-agreements have been made to terminate the above reference lease. In ocher words, the above condiciuns must be met. i/Pbrder to terroinace the le..se. Martin B. Schneider Lessor Minnetonka Center for the Arts Tenant Barbara McBurney Board President Minnetonka Center for Ch Arts Tenant - • V Hf: :«■ -»4- ■m !.■■u m k, ' ;4 Ilf feK'. -r 'r ' KM' ih I’;-' h: Iff:' lJ'-' ^k'.' T' ■ tfv fc- ■4f i ‘ i-'*^'I'; • r- f t *•. /• Mh: >,?■ m Or*Q 0 So'W'DC ®r M Bones troo Rosene Anderllk & Associates ecoe^i >A* ^Kwec'* C Apoc'vfc «^F */ar^>n ScXMtJ P€ S Pi ^ Cc*'jii Pi T’horrjs E 9cce^ G jcr>v^'^<^? c, .^r »,« rp* Engineers & Architects Ci*r ^ Gc>T3or* PE p<»*4'3 'Ji Pc??e» PE C 3or;j'CT p E A 3co*tJor PE Vjf* 4 H^'^sor PE >■; « r.p-:3 '»E ’ ildumr>ann p £ »:C^'T 5 P£ O wDS«ota Pf A P^e'^C'" ’E V,—a« C : pf P Ma^a^l pf ti^nreiry p An.jenc’’ PE V«a't P ®E ftroe-r C p -sv * a 4 E PF •^cvwan3 A Sa'^icva p £ Ga^*r ^ Pfc Vj't -* >c PE p*' »o -’ C*S'4^’ P£ vr*rfp P£ V j/* O Aj'iiV ®E Gan, « P^.<arx5e' PE ».* e-, 9 nrve»' PE ;. G'’av^ ''f PE C P’u'^a't * * K* P:rg 4 • C p 0 Pp*3tc*' PE CfC*-o c--.^ PE Poce'<! P DfrCoA PE Ga-v A p § Ksnfn L A^t»eri P£ tr P raoo PE C»"anes A E'<«ir« *.* PjAfA*. '"•ana'* M O-uy* July 23, 1991 City of Orono 2052 Co. Rd. 24 Hamel, MN 55340 3 L!'-i Attn: Mr. Jeanne Mabusth I» • ^ Q — • ' t• , • I • Re. FOe No. 139 Alts Center Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the work completed on Parcel A and B of the Arts Center Subdivision. The following items should be modified. The light standard on Parcel A should be removed or relocated. If relocated, we would recommend the shoe box light fixtures to minimize glare in the residential neighborhood The fencing that has been placed to divide the parcels is of a temporary nature. We wouL recommend a standard chain link fence. There should be a singU 'ccess f20 maximum wKith) to the residential property (Parcel A and B). The grave! parking aici: should be removed within the Briar Street right-of-way and the area sodded. The drivev/ay to the parking lot on parcel ”C* should be a of 22 feet wide. The bushes along the fence line should be trimmed to provide adequate site distance when entering Briar Street. Please contact this office if you have any questions, iw .-s very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC:U 139.cor 2335 West Highway 34 • St. Paul. Minnesota 55tl3 • 612-636-4600 - a*.- •'' */• V . . . ;• .^ *. ; "vV f i *'' /> ^V'»f » "i. *,TiMi<r •'* • •*T»i Mayor Crabak ( Orono Count;:! y.j-^i err. Planninq Commlpalon Ciairror. Kt^lloy Orono Plftnnino Conmi^Bion VomSerri City Wfwiniatrator nerr.har Isor." ru'iilJoanna A» Mabuath* Puilt'ir.o f- "or ■.?.<: <•. .r : r.; s'r^torApril 13, 1909 • 1397 Art Center of Minnesota, 224C r.crrn li^ore Or*ve - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearra-genent - ^u^’:c bearing Votal Aroa indapandant parcels Fartinant Ordiaancaa - '272,lj7 S.f. or 6.24B acres. Prooerty consists of 6 separata y -.J Saction 11.Ov, Definition 65 (C! - Sottlrvision of a lot llna^^ rearrangamant. Subdivision reouired becau-e r-rof.ert'/ doas not neat ^ raquirad lot standards of PR-IB sonir.g districts. ,." Raquirad ■ 2 acres Existing Lot 5 • 13,760 s.f. or .315 acres (Lot 5, parcel PIN 10-117-23-11 0062' Proposed Parcel B • 27,60C s.f. or .6 34 acres. (expanded building envelope of existing Lot Proposed Parcel A - 244.537 s.f. or 5.614 acres Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (3) ■ Side yard setback for an accessory atructura. *'’■ Required - 10* Existing ■ 29* (east line of existing Lo*- Proposed ■ !*♦ Variance • 9* or 90% •• • faction 10.21, Subdivision »fi) - Side yard setbacks principal atmctt faqairad - 30• :..'lxiatin9 ■ 9* (from west lot line of existing Lot 5) "- ■ 30'11* (setback from proposed lot line) e .• taction 10.30, Subdivision 3 structuraa t taquirad - 50* Proposed e 51.49* (A) - Required setback for sohooi Saotion lO.SO, Subdivision 10 - Screening required If parklnf within 30* of a residential I'^t line for parking of more than vahiclas. Saction 10.01, Subdlv,.Bicn S (A) - parking on a residential lot cannOt j] bo within required yard area but can be within 10* of a side or rear let line. •At i'. ^* t* :i-v3"^'''- li'' I "f:' m ■m-f %\\ i'm\ '■m r. r r i::' .1. * ^ % r- ' ^ ' J ’. 1 .;/.V ■. •■'/, •'!. }•*,; •^'5r-- ■ !• '■-•' ■ -}• .■ .^ VA' **, < ‘ 'Zonir.9 riltt fl397 April 13, 1989 Pa9« 2 of SList of ExhibitsExhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit 0 Exhibit E Exhibit P Exhibit C Exhibit H Exhibit Z Exhibit J Exhibit K » !. tAr-plication Property Ovr.err.Plat MapCouncil Mlnut«s of 6/2** 7m R«strictiv« Covenant Proposal for Metcs t P'-untls nivisi Cook's Report of 5/)2/8‘» Staff's S;;atch - Parkino Floor Flan Enrollment Infcrnati'-n Survey ot SubdivisiC'n Xopiow of Application - As part of the sale of the old Mill ?cho''l, the Art Center has agreed to divide off additional areas of the total property to support the nev single faaily residential use. The application will he reviewed in two phaaes. The first phase will deal with the required standar«.» and impact of the new division lines upon existing improvements as part of the lot line rearrangeSMint subdiviaicn review, and the second will cover a partial conaercial site plan review for the existing Art Center to determine impact on existing improvements as they support the sch<.>o I/corrnunity center use. lot lima EaarranEament * Oace ayain it is important to remind t.«e Planmnq Commission that the Art Center tfOUld have the legal right to rdl !.ot S without the need of any City approvals* Zt is the Art Center's desire to prr'vide additional area for the new evner's single family usv. it is not a subdivision to create -7 nev boildable site* but merely a rearrangement of lot lines. Original Lc S haa beea doubled in area but still doeS not meet the required 2 aerea. Aa propoaed* all required aetbacks jre satisfied from the new let linea for thaSill tehool parcel (referred to on your survey as Parcel Bl* Staff haa oeasera with the minimal 1* setback of the tennis court from the treat aide lot liao of Earcol E. Staff must recommend that a 10' setback from the tamia court be maintained. The lot line must be realigned along the eaat oide of the tonaia court providing a minimum 10' setback resulting in a 27»Sf* aide aotback for the proposed single family structure on Parcel B. • V/ 4 a •. ♦. - ..: <»-e» • a >.• The main aehool structure meets the required 50‘ setback from the naw 4iviaioa liao. •Til Iti Tli% fvtyr# of Farcol B should b« advised that prior to tho Si of tho atructuro th« tinql« family r«sid«nc« must bo coniioctod to It miilablo miUclpal aaoorm V ; ti. -■SSI 1 :»^ *4fi Mr 0>Zoning Pil« «1397 A^ril 13. 19P9 p«9« 3 cf 5 All «xi*ting qravelJe<l i.^rccl B must h« rMmc*v«d within th« r«guir«d 50' fr^-ni strati •.<!.■! «irfct jrJ within 10' cf the north tidw lot lin«. PcrticnB f'f qrtivelled or».o ruy !c retained for access drive but cunnot continue to be ur.c<i for [iirt.nq |.ur|.'^Ses. During the review of the renditi'-na 1 us« (.er.nit for the duplex UBe. a restr.’ctive covenant was noted that was filed against the chain cf title of thw Art Centwr property (review Pxhihit P). The covenant was required as a oontrol over all future building expansi<^n for the total property of the Art Center. It is not clear why the City requested the covenant nor is it clear why the combination (f all the Separate parcels was not required ss the code itself under the conditional use permit for schools would require City review and approve 1 of all erp.insion of »:he ficility. Clearly the restrictive covenant places undue restricri<”n on the new owner cf proposed Parcel B. The City is comfortable with the existing controls on the Art Center school use based on the existing ordinances. Staff sees no need for the restrictive covenant to remain. Planning Commission may have other opinions on this matter, but it would be staff's recommendation that we ask the Attorney who represents the Art Center to prepare the appropriate docuawints that would extinguish the covenant on all the separate parcels. The City Attorney will review the document. Please review Exnibit P. if the City is ‘o accept a Metes & Bounds division for th« lot line rearrangement. w« will require that the fonnat of the subdivision be presented as proposed with the four parcels (A through 0)« The subdivision approval w<ll be conditioned on the appropriate cesftinations. OptftoM cC Action • Donial. Please refer neoesssry findings. to Section 11.O'*a. 0 Subdivision 10 for the . ^ hfiBBVBl based on the following conditions: lAi.fflic Mibstsndard parcels crested by this metes and bounds division land with prinary use parcels. All frsvelled parkin’ area located within required yard areas and viBhia 10* of a side let line to cease use. Parking subject to all niles sad regulations set forth under Section 10.il of the toning mt single family residence lot is hereby advised that BBBstsndard side Setback approved with thla lot line JP—BBBBf saw at $ that no future additions to the west aide of the ’BBBBStCVe absll he approved. All new construction eust eeet the . SatiMk BtBBdardS of the RR«1B toning district. Al Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the •OOVorsioB of the eaisting school structure to a single fsaiily I* the property must be connected to municipal sewer. • ir». t I'■JI#■ ■' !\ ^ ;4 l-J: -V &:■ F i,^» V •■ Ci"'"' - - ■■■^ .-■■ ■V?'ISI T i. m .r-yr !X-■'■■•:■=> j. ' V ! il- ' ‘••S' .* t.' . Jl... r ‘s’i f*' f *4* • ^ • \ « >•’ . t -. • * • . i .. •V. .• ••Ft ^Ii-v•'• -I 'f t \ ^ 1 4 h- ^->i. ■ ’S t'-l1 ,, m t -- -■a I i • 1 ii 5 r.m i!--.s ■:*•. ' 1 f..tiJL % * • r »•« ^ ••• •• r. • Soniii9 Pil« #1397 13, 1989 8 Of 5 ts^. fiV:.; ?«■■■ v>.. li- »I»' i' / rt:p- i'vr r^"" Th« fellowin9 eonditicns shPuJd fee added to the ahcv« approvalt F) Th* Art C«nt«r must |.rovide 10 additional stalls within ths •outhwmtt parkinq ar«a. Staff suggests Se^tcirber 1, 1989 d«adlln« for tha installation of th« 10 stalls. F) For SoCtion 10.60> Subdivision 1C, screening to b« providod along «;outhorn boundary of perking area adjacent to Briar Street. V = 5 <a 4 ^ m I■ ^■|v.1 ’U-/: «: « i'- i;,r-' ■t 1. * • I, • • ,. . r ' ' • ' ■ ■• .’v.- '-rr .-'X r^ ' '•^ «*• ;•••■ .'■ '^v•• ' • #- ♦ « • . j ^ « SKKI '-•r*r . , t__t. ^7 '^r.' '-v.^ Y‘i. *•' •".•■ ■■ - ,-T ,✓ -*4 . / ~V r« • ^ cm or OKONO ^,-;; ».0. .Bex 66 0\ Cryxtxl Bay, mn 5S323 7.0NINC PILE HO. 1397 NOTICC OP PI.ANNIHC COMMISSION ACTION 473-73S7 Dare cf Ncticcj 4/27/S9 *®i **•*■/ SNith COPIES TOi Paul Johnsen MlnnifSC’ta McCemhs Frank Ecoa Assoc. Inc. 2240 North Shoru Dr^vu ISOSO 23rd Avc N - • raytata, MN 55391 Plymouth, MN 55447 tm or ATPUCATlOMi OATS or WBBTmCt 4/17/69 Subdlvisicn/Ccnunurlcal Situ Plan Ruvluw VOTE; 5 For 0 Against riaaniaf Oeaad.aalofi racoosicndB the following: Apiixoval subject to conditions noted below ■OnS AMD 8FBCZAL CONDITIONS: located within required yard areas and vitniA XQ or the side lot line to cease uac. Such gravelled carkinq areas to b« removed. A physical barrier, such as fencing, to b« PJTTidsd along the north side of the newly created residential lot 2, No future additions will be approved along the west side of the existing residential strue'ture because of the substandard side setback •(proved with this division. -weiwea o within parking area to be relocated within Art Centsr ' lot. Lighting must be shielded from adjacent residential lok^ lines* . 4. Vew residential structure must issusfies pf^s.Certificate of Occueany fu i ;^^^EtiC*nt*x .to'^gi / V?2 i- *< '*.**1 w t, -tii'wvAsoapiA ^*4***if WfcAitt* 1 ■ auot b* aubaittad to th* City offlM* >y sehadulad Council oseting to anaur* plMsaMt o* tlM^} ; '■■: ■ l**ly^_, fte.OMMll Mats on the saeond and fooetb Noatey* *C ,-;v-'^l**Xl**si2^„S*rvay of th. lot lin. rearrangement must bo anandad as f i St. ..'. ' .A* Bo^h/south let line to be adjusted so that tsnnls court >t* tha 10* sstbsek.% * • 5b ^ m j- • • ^ a".- ^ • « ' • - i (■ I - ^ • % %^ •. 1I0NX1I6 nut wo. 1397NOTICB or PLANKING COMMISSION ACTION April 27, 1989 P«9tt 2 of 2 ,*r’ . '■ V'-P i* ^ ^ ja -\>r j ■ N A. i*i << B) Survey to be aweru^erf |.rcvi(]ir.n !coj 1 cicseri|.tion* for tho four parcels as described cr. the attached sketch. On that same aurvey signature lines should be {.rovided fc*r all parties with interest in the property, ^!ayc•r and Clerk cf the City of Orcno# and a date line for the approval date. Upon final approval of the subdivision by the Council, applicant will he asked to file legal ccsiblnaticns at the City offices, combining Parcels A S B and Parcels C s D. C) Designate expansion of parkina area showing 10 additional parking stalls and location, proposed fencing along southern boundary cf northeast parking area and screening area (landacace plan). 2. Art Cenvif to provide appre-priate document to extinguish restrictive covenant that currently limits all development on the Bsparata paxcels. This should be submitted as toon as possible to provide the City Attorney adcr;**ate time to review the document. Execution of tho oncl;.ved Developer's Agreement to______ oompletion of improvements# i.e. 10 parking stalls, natural screenino and fencing along the southern boundaries of northeast parking area. The City will ask for a Letter of Credit (150% of cost of total improvements) to ensure the completion of these improvements. Nets dcadlina for the completion of these improvements would be Septamber If 19S9. Please advise if this deadline date is not realistic. 4. Qult«»clalm deed of 33' of right-of-way of County Road 51 to ba w ,. ry V . - < iJi ___t. ■IP■ > a: > i -t^-* ^1 . -A*ji^X.. ••*'*.'■•*.■ >■■ ■' ■' ■ •^U;.- :',y ‘ '.................r ., -••K \ . ■ ' ■ ■ ■■•'.■•.. 1• \ >' f ', C .V'. *- , » r, Ir .*-.**^v -V' ' ' ';■ r"- Vi. « . ^ *4 ... • -'• — 'ft -^ ' • ,.. . - .r '4- .V * s» • * -• \. ■. ' i»t - »*i r .' -•^ r 1 fUJSSi-A/ri.--. . ^'i^jr.O. Bex 66 »»Ccyetel B«y» APPMCATIOH HO. 1397 «M 55323 473-73^7 H0T1C8 OP COOHCIL ACTIOH Date of Notice: 6/20/89 ;-Jf?IO» ,iury .l«lth Center of Minnesota 2240 Berth Shore Drive COPIES: Weysete» MN 11 Ir 'Efc I ,^V' . ■ ’"a ?x: 55391 Subdivi.sion 5/12/B9 Michelle Frahm Re-Max Realty 325 Barry Avenue Sout^ Way/ata, MS 55391 VOTE: 5 For 0 Aqainst Wj tr'ri s'r. ™ approve the Art Center’s metes snti j.ounds sub<!ivision application *e lot line rearrangement. Please note the original resolution has been CXL ACTION - NOTION: To approve the Art Center’s metes ,... aneaded noting the following: Ml Tho subdivid#r p^ill be requirec3 to r rovi<!e an acceptable forai of-s\ ’•} eecurlty to the City in the through November 15. 1989. amount of $5,000.00 to be in affect <• l■■■•fc: ?.■ review the enclosed amended resolution that spells out the ^^^•ctives to be followed by the Art Center, whe*' you have completed your revleWp pleese make arranqcments to file for ♦•ne ap^^ropriate le^al eonblnations of Parcel A with Parcel B, and Parcel c with Parcel 0. This can be completed at the municipal offices. ^ I % Tloaso soo that tho future owner of Parcels A & B wi 1 1 bo advia^d of too conditions of approval that deal with the development of the p’.opsrty OS a rssidontial unit. orsist of the follewlngtThO iaprovsoonts rogulrsd by the Art Center A) installing 12 additional stalls: north p.'operty line of propoaadB) aerssning/fsnelng along the Paresis A a B: r * ’: S't &k- "la C) rosdjttstaant of exterior lighting. /■‘V A Note tbst Sll of these improve:.ents are to be completed by September _ ‘ X# 19S9» ^. Niehsllo Praha presented copies of an executed quifclaim deed of road > and utility esssaents et the Council meeting. The City must ask for an original da#d ao that it can ba filad against tha chain of titia of tna;• property. contact Jeanne Mabusth if you have any further questions. .5:*: f,s«- >'S. I. i * II, \ tty.f •*> :Q ART CENTER .V i n n c s r . 1 V V». re • X i.V\ • • Ana 2* 1989 y-i •i . City of Orono y. O. Bnc 66 Crystal Oar/, K4 S5323 Attantiont Jeanne ^tobusc^, Zoninc; /«±Tunxjtrarjor Dear Mi. Mobusth: fills Isttsr is in tesponss to the DcvcIotAix'u which woj> rstumsd to your ottioo this afternoon alon-j wit,*) the other cioctrchts the City to enable us to be pro-senteO ut the June l.*t.h ’v/ ADOoedULng to page 3 of the Osvslopor's Agrconvr.t, itisn S, the Uevelofur is to furnish a Latter of credit to ensure perfum«r.ce o: the in the anourr; of 1S0% of the anticipated dcvcloin^nt costs. Zt is IV inprsssion tfist this Developer's <Vjrceiicn(. is ocn« illy aied by nthsr large oonstxuetion firms who have significant tunounts or noney invested totSKd the ocspletlon of a project as well as laroe sittb at risk anuld the dswBlepRSRt not cone to a aatasfactory conclusiou Zt is eartsialy to the bnsfit of the public that the City should esOKtain that any builder have significant capital available to fuuuh s construetion project. Vr 'ver. the Art Center project is quite a MsU issue ^*^>*T* to the aoslo with which you generally operate. • - ./* fiMcefbee, X tould laquast that the City rescind that portion of the Oiualflper's kfmomit sagulring Art Center to provide a Latter of Crudit. Our eosts asi alight* ■startala being purchaued at a wioiusalu priou, «id ODnMruotiai taaiiv done by our volmtecrs. .t ths Ooa<cil or its representative as soon so chat wc iniy still aificar before y>Ai w'ij l*ea 81 .fl:' I- m M/fr r*l - n .V4 •• - .r:' W ■•1TES OF TSJ! PlAJ/NING COMMZSSIO’ KEEVINC APBIt, 17, 1999 Am ID *C8 7i00 P.M. ^ . uTh*. Orono Planning Conwiissicn niet on tht above cate with tne followlna tnaiBbara present: Chairran Kelley: Planning Comaiisaion aewfrtrt Johnaon, Cohen, Kanson and Moos. Planning Commission Bfown arrived at 7:15 p.r.. The following represented the City etafft Building and Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Flaming and Zoning Administrator Caffror, Public Works Cirevtor Garhardsen, City Engineer Representative Olson and City Recorder Seheffler. Council Representative Alar. Nettles attended and Ceuncilmember Goetten was also pres'^nt. COBSBNT ACSMDAvas moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning Cosuni as loner Johnson, to approve the ccr.sent agenda. Motion, Ayaa*S, Nays«0. Motion passed. 11397 TB AST CBRn OP NIMMESOTA 21B0 • 2240 MKTI SBOU DRIVB CZA8S X 8UB0IVISZ0II - LOT LINE BEAKRAMCEMENT P0BL2C nSASIVC 7x00 P.M. TO 7:13 P.M. Tho Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of .Mailing were duly noted. Ms. Mary Smith was p.-ssent as a r> presentative for the Art Cantor. Zoning Adadnlotrator Mabusth stated that the Art Center was aaaklng a aubdivlalon of a lot line rearrangement as part of tho sala of tho Old Mill School. Lot 5 will bo doublod la olto fren 13»7«0 o.f. to 27*400 a.f. Staff ii roeoonanding that a 10* ••tbaek bo Mintainod from tho tonnis court to tho now dlwlolon 14m Eothor than 1* as boing proposod. Tho Art Cantor will loao ■22 Dookisf otollo as a rooult of tho aubdiviaion* which will looVo.thoa with 90. Tho City Cnginoor has Indicatod that ho 14u b« eomfertablo with 40 parking atalla and otoff it _ _ _imdiaf that 10 additional stalls within tho aouthwoat pooklng oroa bo provided now and will resorvo tho right to EOfooot aoro if noodod. ..p,dioi»aon Eolloy oaproaaod bis eoncorn of eontlnood vso of '■^ vtlM parklmg ocoo to tho roar of tho Old Rill School. Zt wao hia '^^koliof that parking in that aroa would eontinuo and eauao .troopnnoino open tho proporty which would than bo wood oo o "tingVo foaily rooidonco. Ms. Smith indieatad that thoro wao a •i ••. maaoiklo option of allowing tho looso of tho tonnio court In OMhonoo for owoiloblo parking in tho roar oi tho Old Rill >1. lolloy infermod mo. Smith that tho City would not allow rolol parking on rosidontial proporty. ./VJ5 Plonoiag Oaomdoaienora moos and Johnson eor.currod that tho toaaio eoart bo 10' from tho aldo lot Coaaiooionoro Eonoon and Cohan guootionod whethor tho tonnio oaart.ohavK ho romovod. ns. smith ototod that it would bo a . • iSJhtewA *1. aaivw w* A rr^?-■j •i mmjTgS 0? TSR PLAimrKS COMMISSIOM MSSTING APRIL n, 1989 somaa pxis #i397-nB art csnt op minnpsota fiaaneial hardship for tha Art Center to rerove the tennis court. Kallay aaid that tho financial aspect of an application cannot be eonaidarad* Hanson said that consideration should te given as to whathar It would be practical to do a lot line rearrangement around a dilapidatad tennis court. There ware no comments frcm the public regarding this matter and tha public hearing was closed. Xt was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning COBBiiasionar Moos, to recommend approval of application <1397 as follows: 1. Approve the lot line rearrangement. 2. The standard side yard setback of Structure must be met. 10* for an accessory 3. Approve a 2.9* side yard setback variance for a principal structure. 4. Screening for parking or. the .-.crth side of th - property should be in the form of a physical impediment so as to move the traffic flow up to the north. S. The perking areas located within required yard areas ■ttst be removed and the issue of the existing lamp post must be ravlawed as to placamant and light direction. S. The future owner of the Old Bill School property should be put on notice that no new structural expansion shall be approved >.to the west eide of the structure because of tho ■ubotaadnrd oetbeek. 7. Prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy* th# school structure must be connected to the municipal sawor ayataoi. •• Thoiro should bo a dedication of a 33* right-of-way along ~ north thoro Drive freo tha Art Center. Tlio hardship for approval is the location of the tennia court in rolntioa te tho Old Bill School. Choirnnn Rolloy :*oendad hit motion to include t roooaaoadation that tha City Council address the Iseue of extinouiehing tho reetrictive covenant filed against chain of title for t,te Art Center* Planning Coanlasioner Johnson saceoded the a oendoent* Notion* Ayee*5, Hays-0, Motion passed. ■1 -sr •us-f • •• V >»•m %. - ' e \ r \ V MUniTES OF • COOtICIL MEETING OF JUNE 12, 1989 m I .* XONIWS FILE »1391-S*»I^ oT*constructing a retaining wall, and variances for the P-'JP®® application and recommended The City Engineer has revived this «PP\^«V fppm the lakeshore that the retaining wall f * P°ppp„a in the next 1C to a "t f-\Hrm=o°re’'/fUe‘p ‘l^n* irti,= th"e Stading within 7V of the lake. Mr. Sadler ‘t^^-^^hat the Engineer^ not allaviate the sloped also stated that the ^Srla:rp^rn^Vul■’d^^r?im^^”r^'noVf fr^m the slope onto his neighbor's property. councilmember rone?“e allowing 5- of close to the shared lot !i«/~»ld‘“cl."alrmrre°Wc|lem. ^atlahan”*councilmember Goetten concurred with Callahan. It was moved by pp® i^atioV St2«“rd?“t''r^.n?;i ^es^luti". Motion, Ayes^5, Nays-0. Motion passed. #13S7 ART CBMT*R OP MIMNESOTA 2180/2240 IK>RTB 8HORB DRIVE jjSt LIVE RBARRAE6BMEIIT IlSOLIITIOa #2839MSe Michelle Frahm was present# Executive Director of the Art Center. Sonin, Ad-ini.tr.tcr r^llim Setd”?h^t Grabek that th. Art Canter «« ^P?pf!„ay All otherwould provide P>>* with e 33 r^ght y aepeet. of this ««. 10° aetback. A total of tennis court will nw meet tno re^ Mabusth said that she nad “o5^5^d^’U•,»^Vt^^V."^e"rt^c:"n;er^^ waive the requirement of e letter of credit. ^ in liaht of no new development .CtU.?iV'o«uVi?,^:\”%hi}%ubdiv|s^^^ BrJ:pr/«rg “wouid h. echieved with minimal expense. Mayor Cr.t.k •xP«”*f,J|i„|-?pVd"\'hat T.\rTLlp b^ required »«» Pleee e J™Xr Callahan indicated that he :ouS%‘Vot”/bjV^'’to thrt?"'MVy"o*r crabek suggested that the sum of 19p000e00 be escrowed. as was Ks. Ann Stover# K: fc.\;, -’4 ik t‘ii y k- Pk> k ;• • 'S,i .-•r. n .(■.>• ■; . ii MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OP JUNE X2r 1989 JJTJMTUJ- 1PTT1T Ai‘947-ART (‘KNTER OF MINNESOTA CONTINUED i“ »o ”d“y Grabeic, seconded by Counci lumber Petersen, to adopt Resolution #2639, approving the l^ne rMarrAnoement for the Art Center of Minnesota, and requiring the J” ”.nt?rto place an appropriate sum in escrow in Ireu of a letter of credit. Motion, Ayes-S, Nays-0, Motion passed. #1401 JOHN FIBBELKORN 2730/2740 SBADTNOOD ROAD yyt Un REARRANGEMENT naiL APPROVAL for this matter There were no expressed concerns on behalf of the Council, nor the applicant. wee moved by CounciImember Goetten, Co»nciU«rilr nettles, to adopt /i^ John ;?Ke7A^o"r’n.‘‘’;ot\'ol Vyrs.S^•^7;sTTo‘tio“n"%«el"=* •1402 J<»H LIHNBXBR 320 CRISTVIBM AVENUE mUMCE *****Mj?*^to«y«r was present for this matter and indicatec that he bed no questions or objections. There was no further discussion on behalf of the Council. ConneiLi^r".’ttrson^, tl“adopt “sol^i'on''#26*»“ Aj:.^“^-K?y;t“o:*Jit“i“c“n“yassVd-*"“* •* • • . •1403 3205, 3215, 3255 AND 3265 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD ^/VARIANCE “^®!I!Sd'M‘rsV s”ipp,”‘.Vwolf. and Mr. Erger were present for this matter. •a«M4«kM sAninietrator Mabusth advised the Council that the svV‘:,^Tr.rn\" nrr?drng““p^%ri*t :i retaining walls. There were no further comments or questions on behalf of the applicants, nor the Council. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember itotelM to .dopt R.»olutions #2642, 12643, #2644, approving the SSr^«It .nd variance for Erger, Wolfe, Schupp and S^rMn. Motion, Aye.-S, Nays-0, Motion passed. I • ..> •••• . ., - .. • • , ■ _ _■] iM' . /« . ^ ■ X. . » » • . . . • 4* * • ‘ ^ ^ * ‘ "*•*** *1 ’ * r*'t #» ^ • / • ■^ ’ x'i % • ■' f> v-x,‘*A ^ '• \ ^ \ */• ’"'^1 * «. ~ . . " • * • *, A. y .•'•/’-.*• ^ * . ^ V* ♦. '• ■ V '•••*•♦ ■ • ^ ^ ’-'jy/.N'.’'-. V ~‘ ,,-V‘'' ■. ■‘.V i^ : . rC«'. •''• '- „• \. ' . ;,^*r^*"T^- ~ '*\V ‘^* ?i V [•H«l • ' A '• y** ■•.••aTY.»T. [a, op- :. liOROMdij ■Ltv^.yvVji _ _A RBSOI.OTION APPROVING A KSTSS AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION OP A Un LINE REARPANCRMENT POR PROPSRTIRS ^.OCAihO AT 2180/2240 NORTH SHORE DRIVE PIL£ NO. 1397 WHEREAS, the City of Orono ;s a nunicipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Vinnesota; ttnc .4 J*®#**'*'*®'Council has considered the application for a subdivision of a lot line r.arranoement by the Art Center of Minnesota (hereinafter “the subdivider") o' properties legally described as follows: Exhibit A, attached (hereinafter 'the property*); and «P eh- 'ivider has completed all requirements tn# City for a nataa and bounds lubdiv^xsaon of a lot lin« ^***^^*^9*w**'^ ^o*" division and combination purposes. «P eh- ” resolved, that the City Council division ^of h«rvby approves the metes and houndsaivisxen of e lot lino rearrangement for the Art Cento- of rfh*”**®^^ •• *hown on the Certificate of Survey Paul A JohMon Of McCoad,., Pran)t, Roes Associatas. Inc. revised May 23* condltionlf^**^*** resolution, subj. t to the following 1. Upon approval of this subdivision by the City Council di^ttlhV.?4« Vh wP“"'P°“®® °- following properties as /"i referenced survey of the metes and bounds divlaion of the lot line rearrangenent : A to be combined wir'’. Parcel B Parcel C to be combined with Parcel D Paqe 1 of 3 h * ■ ■ ,4 ■• T‘ '-I f ■ \•V . ‘ V- “ ' fr "M < 4. > . - , * i4 * ■- . -I il'' Tk. f \Z .* ’ u'■ ■ » t *v ^ '...••-s'tAVf k» , ■ ' , ■ . . ‘h.,'• • ■ —I. ••.(♦•.,•.'••••-• ' . ■ ^ —^A: . ,. V- i . ' '.t t • 4'V“> r - *-.•'••• h • , wA'.j- ^ ^ ii. »»•>. > 'I •'■**; ••'*'«* » JO , , A, '■.' T O' • .'.»••■•;• ' ■ '■ ■ • : .... ' .J.i.-*;..;:'',..’i'- .'■ V. ,■•'»•.-v."» ? /• t i , w «• i. »• I. r r :■' ■ • -.'^a• * . * .'vi^ Vy.%'./: • • r . '.* • .' • i • * t-^. * * .• •• '-/i , . * • • .• j ■ •r. .........................................V \ • • » . . • ' ’ Sv;' .■ •r-tss''.-. • *’• ’ '■ ’".rn :• vV.- < • fr • ^ r •■^‘1 .r Citv of 0]R0?N’0 P'-SOLUt’lON O'^ The CI’V COuN'Ca NO _-: ; 2. Prior to th« issuance of t^c Cer.;ficat« of Cccupancy for tho conversion of tne existing scf.ool structure to a single family residence on combined Parcels A and B, tne property must be connected to rur.icinal sewer. 3. All new construction or. the newly created parcels must neet the setbac't standards of the RH-13 zoning di^stiict and all other pertinent sections of the Crc''o Toning .'ode. 4. Parking for t.he Art Center on combined Parcels C and D are hereby approved as amended on the official site plan approved by the City Council with this subdivision application and that based on staff’s amendment to the plan, the total number of stalls approved and provided with thin review remain at 62 stalls. 5. Subdivider shall execute a Cevulopec’s Agreement to ensure that the parking expansion, -^cr een i ng / f one mg, and re-adjustment of exterior lighting is co-oleted by September 1, 1989. Subdivider shall provide ar. acceptable form of Security zo the dty ir. ar.our.t of S^,00C.oC to be in effect through November 16. 1989. 6. The subdivider shall provide the City with ar. executed road and utility easement t-> l e granted to the Hennepin County Department of Transportation. 7. The aforesaid division as shewn on the attached Certificate of Survey shall be filed hy the City of Orono with the Hennepin County Pecordei's office and Registrar o. Titles office on or before December 12, 1909 together with a certified original cooy of this resolution and other covenants and eas-'m**-* s required by this subdiv.sion approval. The approval granted by t.his Resolution shall expired if the division has not been filed by the date specified nbove. In that avent, it will be necess.iry to file a new application 1th the City of Orono for subdivision review. Paoe 2 of 3 « *61 ( vans H ^ iV r-#LV*. ^ ^ ^ T . ^ i ' • t w ^ d ' V : . \w ..; 'v,/. ■ • - ••,.• ■'< - , -v'.v -,- -4-*4 11 ,\' •. •■■'•. •/•,. * m '\7\ /-'V L- «.*..> . .,* ^>ry r: ■• OP-., ORONOt - «,c\ ■ X 9 • '' . • ; • • • • - * - < [•kWa ■-0' ' •■» \'4.' t' i •r'y« .trx fj -a* 4 « . Adopted by the City Council cf Ororo, .Vinreso-e, ♦•h’s 12th dey of June. 1969. eso.«, .n.s ATT»T: i f >‘ * drothy^^ hallln, City ClexV. Junes ?.. :;rar.t>V, Mayor STATE or KINKESOTA ) ) 98. COUVTY cr HENKEPXN ) thi« 12th?*“v acy.nowl edged before me on June, by James R. Graber. i Lorothv *•. “a’ 'in- - Xir.nesoJa ^unJcrpal City. instrument was executed on be.half of the .-H„, Kota ry Public ■»■• //4 •t •ifivj; f. I^aURI! *. SCMOMR ^ • ». 'an *. »,. . • V * H(NN|f(N COuNff . jmS^ i * • ^879i.l Tot Froat Datet Subjoctt Mayor Peterson 6 Orono Council Members 4' Bid Award - Replacement Lift Station #11 John R. Gerhardson, Acting City Administrator... "A V, ^4^.August 7, 1991 A / ^ On August 2, 1991 the City of. Orono received and opened bvjj^ for the renovation of Lift Station ill. The lift station renovation program has been implemented to systematically renovate existing lift stations that have reached their useful life. <su ^ / if Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk & Associates Enginee rs A Architects July 29, 1991 Ooo G Bon«»oa RoOerr W Rwenc. PE XMCpn C Anoenik. PE Mjrwi L SorvM PE RcnjitJ E Tomer PE Giertn R CoOk. PE rhomji E Moy«. P£ toC)erT G Scfuincm. PE Suwr M C PA KMh A GofOon PE »cn#TJ W Four' PE Oon^ C BurgJAJL PE jerry A BoiPOOr) P£ igUrk A HenKX' PE Th3 K FfW PE MOjr T Rjutmann PE Hooen R Pflff!\pne PE D^VKJ O LOVOtJ PE Thomjj W F^tenon PE Mcnw C Lynch PE ijmn R Mjiand PE icervw P Anderior p£ Mjrt R Ml. P£ Rooerr C fuisee. ai a Thornes E Anguv PE HwefO A SerM) PE Daniel J Ecjgerton PE Mart A Sep PE * Phiirp J Cisv^ef PE JVTvee* Mjrtjnez. PE Mart 0 NAM1 PE Ti-omai R Andenon A i a Ga/y F Ryiander pe ^Ain B Jenien PE L PhiUio Gravel m PE Rene C P*urrvarT. Al » Agnes M Ring. A»C P jerry o PprtHcn PE CecrAS CXver ®E Rocen R D^cncm ^ pe Gary W Monen PE tjien L Wemef* PE Keen R rjpp. PE Charles A 6nc«on Leo M P^ivetsry Hartan M 0*Son O'.> LC X 1C.O-; City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 35323 Attn: John Gerhardson Re: 1991 Seal Coat OurFUeNo. 13958 Dear John: On Friday, July 19,1991 sealed bids were received for the 1991 Seal Coat Project. A total of three (3) bids were received. All bids have been computed and checked and shown on the enclosed tabulation forms. The lo^v bidder is Bituminous Roadways, Inc. with a low bid of $10,327.50. We have worked with Bituminous Roadway in the past and the work was completed in a satisfactory manner. We recommend the project be awarded to Bituminous Roadway, Inc. in the amount of $ia327.50. If you have any questions please contact us. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC:dh Enclosure 13958 233B mint HIgtwviiy 34 • St. Paul# Minnesota 55113 • 612*4364600 • 35th Anniversary r TO: PROM: Mayor and City Council John R. Gerhardson, City Administrator^ % / V/’ DATE:August 8, 1991 % SUBJECT: Appointments Resolution Amendments Each year the City Council must, by resolution, appoint persons to represent the City to other agencies, organizations etc. With the recent departure of Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator, it will be necessary to amend the resolution temporarily until a new administrator begins employment. The resolution specifically designates Mark Bernhardson as City representative to the following: the 1. Association of Metropolitan Municipalities 2. Legislative Liason AMM 3. Southwest Sanitary Sewer District 4. Suburban Health Nursing Service 5. Suburban Rate Authority (alternate) 6. Hennepin Emergency Communciations Organization 7. Highway 12 Policy (alternate) RECOMMENDATION - To amend resolution #2919 to remove previous City Administrator Betnhardson's name as representative to the above appointments and to temporarily appoint Acting City Administrator, John R. Gerhardson to the above appointments. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, to amend Resolution #2919 to temporarily appoint John R. Gerliardson as the representative to the above organizations. Ayes _, Nays _. city of OROIVO ( I I V RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ^919 ORONO A RBSOLOTION DESIGNATING SELECTED APPOINTMENTS FOR THE TEAR 1991 BB IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota that the appointments and designations for the year 1991 are as follows : AFPOIETMENT/DESIGRATION 1991 Acting Mayor Planning Commission Rep. to Council Park Commission Chair Representative to Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Representative to Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Legislative Liaison AMM AMM Legislative Contact Lead Attorney City Attorney Firm Edward Callahan/ Jr. Alternate Richard Flint JoEllen Hurr Mark Bernhardson Alternate Attorney Lead Engineer City Engineering Firm Auditor Fiscal Agents Insurance Agent of Record Official Newspaper Official Depositories/ Investment Vendors Mark Bernhardson ' J. Diann Goetten Tom Barrett Popham, Haik/ Schnobrich, Kaufman and Doty William Both, Dorsey & Whitney Glenn Cook Bonestroo/ Rosene/ Anderlik and Associates Pannell/ Kerr, Forster Ehlers & Associates Duweyn P. Carlson Apple Valley Insurance The Laker and Pioneer Newspaper First National Banks of: The Lakes (Navarre) Wayzata Minneapolis St. Paul Wayzata Bank & Trust Company Marquette Bank, Minneapolis American National Bank & Trust Company of St. Paul League of MN Cities - 4M Fund Norwest Bank Minneapolis Twin City Federal Savinas 6 Loan Piper, Jaffray & Ropwood, Mpls. Dain Bosworth/ Inc., Mpls Prudential-Bache, Mpls r f-. t city of OROIVO i I 1 V RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2919_________ OBONO APPOINTMENT/DESIGNATION Official Depositories/Continue-i Invastnent Vendors Need Inspector Assistant Weed Inspector Transportation Commitree Esitrgancy Preparedness Director r.outhwest Sanitary Sewer District Suburban Health Nursing Service West Hennepin Recycling Commission Mayor's Association Suburban Rate Authority West Tonka Senior Citizens Minnesota Police Recruiting System West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board (2 Plus Alternate) Building Code Board of Appeals Development Committee Hennepin Emergency Communications Organization Vi •S' 1991 Maryland Nat’l Bank, Baltimore, MD Franklin Savings Bank, Ottowa, KS North Fork Bank & Trust Co, New York Commerce Bemk, Virginia Beach, VA Hon Fed Bank, FSB, Costa Mesa, CA Connecticut Bank & Trust, Hartford, CT Columbia 1st Bank, FSB, Arlington, VA (Wash D.C. Branch) Chase Manhattan Bank, New York, NY Barbara Peterson John Gerhardson John Gerhardson Police Chief Mark Bernhardson Mark Bernhardson John Gerhardson Barbara Peterson John Gerhardson Mark Bernhardson (Alternate) Barbara Peterson Police Chief Gary Cheswick (Alternate) LaDean McWilliams David Use (Alternate) Steve Anderson, Mtka Fire Inspec. Tom Anderson, Hopkins Bldg Offic. !laureen Bellows, AIA Architect Jim Hanson, Builder Theodore Paulfranz, Edina Fire Ch. Public Works Director City Engineer building & Zoning Administrator Mark Bernhardson Police Chief (Alternate) 'St: City of ORONORESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2919 ________ OH UNO APPOIHTNBNT/bBSIGMATION 1991 North Tonka Crime Prevention Coalition Board of Directors Highway 12 Appointments: Policy Committee Police Chief (5/9/93) Barbara Peterson (5/9/93) Technical Committee Citizens Committee Barbara Peterson Mark Bernhardson (Alternate) John Gerhardson J. Diann Goetten George Johnson Eleanor Winston John Massopust (Alternate) Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, regular meeting held January 14, 1991.at a 'U Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor allin, 'City Clerk .1 & i" t k.. '^i ft-\iv I' f, pi. r- I (nrv I iir laRawcE CITY of ORONO Post Office Bo* 66*Crysul Bay. MionewU 55323 • Munidpd Offlcw On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka ■'iss ion February 12r 1991 Jennifer watts. Administrator Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications co 443 Oak Street Excelsior, MN 55331 Dear Jennifer, The Otono City Council at their regular Council meeting of Pehcuary 1°' 1 ”^ appointed the following persons to the LHCCC for Ibil: Timothy J. Pattrin 1360 Railroad Avenue P.O. Box 51 > Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Mary C. Butler 3145 Casco Circle Wayzata, MM 55391 The alternate for 1991 is;Mayor Barbara Peterson 1261 Arbor Street P.O. Box 164 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Please make these changes to youc records effective immediately. / Sine Dorothy City Clerk' llin MUNNC a ZONIM* . 473.‘Q5T Aimanric AOMINISTRATIO iN a HNANCE - <7>?35l rAX - 4TM5W PUBLIC WORKS - 40-735* TO:Mayor Peterson & Orono Council Members Acting Administrator Gerhardson Frovs Dates Tom Kuehn, Finance Director • August 12, 1991 Subject: 1992 Budget Process Attachements: A. B. C. City Administrator's Memo dated 6/20/91 Proposed 1992 Budget Draft of Proposed 1991 Tax Levy Collectable 1992 laauesr. 2. Presentation of proposed 1992 Budget and tax levy for review. Selection of a date for a work session on the 1992 Budget. Discussion: The attached proposed budget for 1992 and the proposed tax levy for 1992 are presented for your review. As stated in the City Administrator’s neno of June 20, 1991 the proposed tax levy and budget resolution must be adopted at the August 26, 1991 Council meeting. These resolutions must then be sent to the County auditor before September 3, 1991. Between now and the August 26th Council meeting I should receive notification from the County regarding the budget public hearing dates for the County and the various school districts. We then must select from the dates remaining between November 15 and December 20 for our truth in taxation budget hearing dates. These dates must be selected at the August 26th meeting and sent to the County auditor. RecoHBnendation In view of the current meeting schedule and demands on Council's time I would recommend that a budget work session date be set at the August 26th Council meeting for sometime in September or October and that the attached proposed 1992 budget and tax levy be accepted as information for review. Proposed Motion: Moved by seconded by tha • Council accept the pr posed 1992 budget and tax information for review w*i.h consideration for aaoption at the August 26, 1991 Council meeting. Ayes Nays 1. FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Cuuncil Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator June 20, 1991 62191 PrTTACfflU^ A SUBJECT: 1992 Budget Process 1 ■.’y r. . I- I Attachment: A. City Facility Memo Dated 10/5/90 ISSUE 1. Presentation to Council of the budget process for 1991. 2. Presentation to Council of initial estimates for budget consideration. INTRODUCTION - Given the alterations to the Truth in Taxation re<]Uirements Attachment A is presented for Council information. AS a result of that the City’s budget process dates will be as follows: * Attempt to provide preliminary budget information to Council by July 22, 1 991 and if not by August 12, 1991. * Proposed 1992 tax levies and budget resolutions must be adopted at August 26, 1991 Council meeting. Also the City must select dates for the initial and continuation budget heatings to be held between November 15 and December 20, 1991 after receipt of information from the County * Budget work sessions(s) with City Council and with staff in September - October * Publish notice of proposed pt^^pc^.ty taxes before the hearing to be held between November 15 and December 20 * At budget hearing(s) Council must adopt final budget and property tax levies. (Note property tax levy adopted cannot exceed amount adopted at August 26 Council meeting, but may be lower at Council’s discretion.) * City must certify the final budget and property tax levies adopted at budget hearing(s) to the County Auditor by Friday, December 27, 1991 DISCUSSION - Because of the **no growth” levy limits placed on all cities during the recent legislative session, the General Fund tax levy increases for the City will be zero, except for some potential special levies. initial estimates place personnel/increase which make up about 70% of -che budget at about . '.. - 1, k 2 1/2 to 3%. Given the lack of a property tax increase which normally would equal about $55/000» the increase in expenditures rel^'c to a 3% general salary increase is about $50,000 plus increases to vendors, etc. will total another $40,000 will need to be funded by other sources including; - Use of fund balance to be later offset by increased property taxes when levy limits are no longer applicable (they are to cease in 1993). - Increased charge for services $27,000. Use investment earning from PIR fund to general $20,000. - Increase transfer from Building Fund. - Increase in other fee rates including recycling/and septic. It is not expected that there will be any growth in the figure used for licenses and permits nor fines and forfeiture use may actually decrease. Potential cost reductions could include the following - 1 year interim measures; - Forego all or part of the equipment transfer $63,180 to equipment fund (not prudent to do on a repeated basis.) As an alternative the City could make use of a special levy and issue equipment certificates totalling the amount of equipment anticipated to be pruchased. The property tax levy could then be increased by the amount. In concert the City could reduce the 1 year equipment transfer to that amount. - Reduce the street/sea 1 coating program on other than MSA roads/which are reimbursed to a degree from the MSA fund. - If a storm water utility is established, look to charge street sweeping as storm water quality issue. With a new facility there will be additional operations cost for larger facilities including; heat, light, custodial etc. and when fully operational are estimated to be $75,000 as noted in Attachment A. During 1992 this will probably only be about $40,000 of increased expenditure. This could be offset in part by increase rental charges to sewer, water and police $40-50,000. Long term solutions include amount bonded, taxed and transferred as part of the City Hall financing together with ony levys to pay r ?! 'k bonds off early. The impact of no tax increase relates to a 11.30 estimated tax capacity rate, a reduction from 1 1.865 in 1991, even with $200,000 for specia 1s/bonds it would be 12.62. (These calculations do not adjust for the new classification charges.) The optional sales tax ($9 1,000 to Orono) is used to "buy dow " the 3% to 2 1/2% valuation. If it does not go into effect this will raise the City's tax capacity rate. Any significant loss of service contracts may require increases to offset net revenue losses. Extension of service contracts will generally provide positive increases in net revenue. In addition there will be other specific items that will be identified for the 1992 budget as staff goes through the process during the summer months for presentation to Council with the preliminary budget information. Given the legislative changes the City of Orono will be limited to essentially no increase in levy limits, there would be no penalty any more for exceeding the levy limit because the City has lost all of its Aid between the 1989 special legislative session and the 1990 regular legislative session. (The penalty for exceeding the levy limts was a loss of aid at the $.33 for every dollar exceeded.) ALTERNATIVES 1. Accept the information. 2, provide direction to staff if not in concurrance with their present direction. 3. Take no action. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council accept the information dTrecting staff to establish initial bugetary numbers for the Council for consideration at either the last meeting in July or the first meeting in August. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by that Counci 1 accept the information directing staff to bring back initial tax and budget numbers at the first meeting in August. Ayes _, Nays cc: Department Heads ....... I'- /f 7T4 ■ #. ^.i:- 'f- ? !■ |: fe- , •.!; ■ »^,iv=; t^r &v<-r" ' - f [■'5h’- h Lr'^- Ifer rt-iu. li- I \ y ■4Is ¥ h RBSOLOTION APPROVING THE PROPOSED 1991 TAX LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN 1992 BB IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, that the following sums of money be levied for the current year, collectible in 1 992 upon the taxable property in the City of Orono, for the following purposes: General Fund $1,644,831 Special Assessments against City property for the City's share of 1985 sanitary sewer project (G.O. Sewer Imp Bond 1985)5,630 Lost Tax Receipts Due to Abatements 1990 6,220 G.O. Sewer Improvement Bond 1985 50,000 G.O. Sewer Improvement Bond 1980 16,800 G.O. Sewer, Water, Street Improvement Bond 1982 5,500 Bonds of Other Government Units - H.R.A. Building Bond 158,000 TOTAL $1,886,981 BB IT FORTHER RBSOLVEO, that this levy is subject to possible reduction by the City Council at the public budget hearing. The City Clerk is hereby certified copy of this resolution Hennepin County, Minnesota. instructed to transmit a to the County Auditor of Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held August 26, 1991. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: Dorotny M. Hallin, city Clerk V V- ' f *>II I 1 A ■< %.:■■ I I 'd I I'> i'--, '■m I ’■>.•»■ f ■ If :. ■• lIV' f'i'" I I .1 ,•>' • I >' ■' '. mir-'.If t'I I;C' ■ /I .'v ^ .■ I I I Y- 'I I ‘r ‘■. T' ; r?'Y -V - yv- • CITY OF (,)RONO ORONO, MINNESOTA PROPOSED 1992 BUDGET FOR THE YEAR JANUARY 1, 1992-DECEMBER 31, 1992 r CITY .*1 Of ORONO On the Sorih Sh<>re of I uke \hnni’!t>f: * -Y n >'-/ ■ :r.; ;■ ■ ' - .. -•Mr10-'I'iSp: t f;-i' ■ V W'% •f jr^ (p'- i?P' 1^ '!:^'l4.: .ii fl"'tv P te. f lip,; mr i‘ym tp riiiAlpsWK iP M- E«?Mm^•mi. ''■■■?,•■ fl i.-l CITY OF OROMOORONO, MINNESOTA PROPOSED 1992 BUDGET FOR THE YEAR JANUARY 1, 1992 - DECEMBER 31, 1992 1991 CITY COUNCIL BARBARA A. PETERSON, MAYOR EDWARD J. CALLAHAN Counci Imentber J. DIANN GOETTEN CounciImember GABRIEL JABBOUR Counci Imentber MARY C. BUTLER CounciImember City Administrator J F'r,91487.6(34) V' • , CITT or OROMO ORONO, HINNBSOTA PROPOSED 1992 BUDGET TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction to Funds Comparison of 1991 Budget to 1992 Budget Revenues 1990 Actual - 1991 Estimate - 1992 Estimate estimated Fund Balance Governmental Funds Y/B 12/31/91 and Y/E 12/31/92 estimated Retained Earnings Enterprise Funds Y/B 12/31/99 and Y/B 12/31/91 Tax Capacity Values, Tax Levies k Tax Capacity Rates, 1990 vs. 1991 General Fund Budget by Department Ciiy Council Administration elections Assessing Finance Legal Government Buildings Human Services Police Protection Fire Protection Planning, Zoning k Protective Inspection Emergency Preparedness Animal Control Engineering Public Morks - Street Maintenance Parks and Recreation Recycling k City Clean Up Reimburseable Expenses from Developers k Police Spec. Services Special Projects k Contingency Special Revenue Funds Park 9und Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund Building Capital Outlay Fund Capital Project Funds Municipal State Aid Construction Fund Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Debt Service Funds 196{*7( Tmprovement Bond Debt Fund 1989 Improvement Bond Debt Fund 1982 Improvement lend Debt Fund 1985 Improvement Bond Debt Fund Enterprise Funds Water Operating Fund Sever Operating Fund Golf Course Operating Fund Personal Services Allocation by Department, 1991-1992 CmsRilmtivm Budget Inforaietioo - Appendix *A* page I IV-X XI XIII 1 2 4 5 7 9 10 11 12 15 16 18 19 29 21 23 25 26 27 28 29 39 31 32 34 35 36 37 38 45 52 55 57 w 91487.3a(46) CITY OF ORONO IMTRODDCTIOH TO bODGBTBD FUNDS ■ft n- I ITf Th« City of Ocono operates under "Optional Plan A* fora of governaent as defined in the State of Minnesota Statutes. The City Council, coaposed of an elected mayor and four elected councilaeabers, exercises legislative authority and deteralnes all aatters of policy. The accounts of the City are organized on the basis of funds and account groups, each of which Is considered a separate accounting entity. A fund is defined as a fiscal and accounting entity with a aelf>balanclng set of accounts to record cash and other resources, together with related liabilities and balances. Funds are segregated for the purpose of carrying on specific activities or objectives under special regulations, restrictions or llnltatl«ns. The City prepares buc'gets for the following funds, grouped by fund type. 1. Governnental Funds types ate those through which smst governnental functions are financed and Include the following fundst a) General Fund - The General Fund Is the general operating fund of the City. It Is used to account for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund. b) Special aevenue Funds - Special Revenue Funds ate used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources (other than special assessments, espandable trusts, or najor capital projects) that are legally restricted to expenditures for specific purposes. Included in this fund type arei Park Fund InprovesMnt and Bquipaient Outlay Fund Building Capital Outlay Fund c) Debt Service ^unda - Debt Service Funds are used to account for the accumulation of resources for# and the payment of# general long-term debt principal. Interest, and related cos'.s. Included In this fund type are: 1966-76 Improvement Bond Fund 1980 Improvement Bond Fund 1982 Improvement Bond Fund 1985 Improvement Bond Fund The debt service funds appear as information only. Formal budgets are not required annually as the schedule of bond redemption and sources of revenue are established at the time of bond sale. d.) Capital Project Funds - Capital Project Funds are used to account for financial resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities other than those financed by proprietary funds and trust funds. Included In this fund type are: Municipal State Aid Construction Fund Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund 2. Proprietary Fund Types are used to account for the City^s activities which are similar to the private sector. The City has three (3) Enterprise or Proprietary Funds wherein the costs of providing goods or services to the general public on a continuing basis are to be financed or recovered primarily through user charges. Included in this fund type are: Water Operating Fund Sewer Operating Fund Golf Course Operating Fund ir : ' Mi GENERAL AND SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS 1991 DEPARTMENT VS 1992 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OIMIRAL FUND OtPMtTNIIIT cm OOOIICIL AONXIlZSTmTXON ■LICTZ0II8 AASKSSIMO rXMMICI IT BUILDINGS SBRVICBS FOI.XCB rXMBnAimxiio « loiiiNo ■NMWBIICr mBPARBDNBSS MXWOOOIITBOL ■mXlIBBIlXM STMBt NAXIITBMANCB PMO» B MCRBATIOM SSSiSut. f>«. D.V.L ____IBABLB-POLICB SPEC SBRVICBS IXBi. PNOJIC TS/OOWTINO , jiMBIIT OUTLAY FUND fXLOnW OUTLAY FUND rxK Fuio TOTAI. OBMBBAL FUND OTKXAL KBVBMUB FUNDS P' :te.im fABK FUND XNFNOVBIIBMT IQUIPNINT OUTLAY OOMY Ip. f.-j 'L - - BUXLDZHO TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS EjfQfAL OENERAL AND SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS fc'-. if mi m- pyr ■m. '■Wy' :p- C .'.m .M. \ OF $11,100 61,350 102,690 175,140 $3,215,400 isisssssstsssrs: 1991 ADOPTED BUDGET 1991 ESTIMATED BUDGET 1992 1992 BUDGE! PROPOSED OVER (UNDER BUDGET 1991 BUDGET r 1 I 1992 OVER 1991 BUDGET (UNDER) BUDGET 65,430 65,430 68,530 3,100 4.74% 170,570 173,420 179,860 9,290 5.45% 2,060 2,060 17,220 15,160 735.92% 71,880 72,410 74,680 2,800 3.90% 144,150 149,140 156,480 12,330 8.55% 204,700 165,100 192,000 (12,700)>6.20% 43,740 43,740 44,080 340 0.78% 13,980 13,980 14,210 230 1.65% 1,073,870 1,073,870 1,122,030 48,160 4.48% 180,020 183,630 193,020 13,000 7.22% 294,630 297,110 307,940 13,310 4.52% 3,670 8,120 3,350 (320)-8.72% 11,440 12,060 14,170 2,730 23.86% 4,950 4,950 4,950 0 0.00% 474,770 474,770 493,260 18,490 3.89% 53,290 54,360 55,140 1,850 3.47% 68,390 68,390 67,320 (1,070)-1.56%26,550 27,000 27,000 450 1.69% 5,700 5,700 9,000 3,300 — 65,720 68,980 22,290 (43,430)-66.08% 60,750 60,750 62,800 2,050 3.37% 0 0 0 0 —— 0 0 0 0 3,040,260 3,024,970 3,129,330 69,070 2.93% $0 61,350 414,990 S6,100122,500 105,800 (5,000) 61,150102,690 45.05% 99.67% 476,340 234,400 59,260 33.84% $3,501,310 $3,363,730 ;SSSSB&S = SSSS! 14B,330 SSfliZSKatSEJ ixsa; 4.61% !«BS Dd«P L . '! • Vy i} CITY or ORONO CAPITAL PROJECT DEBT SERVICE AND ENTERPRISE FUNDS 1991 DEPARTMENT BUDGET VS 1992 DEPARTMENT BUDGET i OF s ■I,., mfe-0 y-y., CAPTIAL PROJECT FUNDS MUNICIPAL STATE-AID CC’STRUCTION PERMANENT IMPROVE, REVOLVING TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS DEBT SERVICE FUNDS 1966-76 IMPROVEMENT BOND 1980 IMPROVEMENT BONO 1982 IMPROVEMENT ROND 1985 IMPROVEMENT Br>ND TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUNDS ENTERPRISE FUNDS WATER rUNDt CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 1989 IMP BOND DEBT OPERATIONS TOTAL WATER FUND « SEWER rUNDi OONSTRUCTIOM PROJECTS 1989 IMP B(»ND DEBT OPERATIONS TOTAL SEWER FUND G<n.F COURSE FUNDt OPERATICWS TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS 1991 ADOPTED BUDGET 1991 ESTIMATED BUDGET 1992 PROPOSED BUDGET 1992 OVER/(UNDER) 1991 BUDGET 1992 BUDGET OVER/(UNDER) 1991 BIUOGET 560,000 17,600 10,000 22,680 1,560,000 67,650 1,000,000 49,970 — 577,680 asss?*. sssssssB 32,680 esaassBSssaaa 1,627,650 ssBaaaasssasa 1,049,970 Baasaasassaas saaaasssssaaa 154,730 110,540 38,380 102 610 154,730 110,540 38,380 102,610 0 104,420 31,410 109,000 (154,730 (6,120 (6,970 6,390 -100.0% -5.5% -18.2% 6.2% 406,260 ssassaaessssa 406,260 aaBBaaasasaas 244,830 saasaasssaaas (161,430) -39.7% BasaBasssBSBS bbbbsbbsssssb 552,600 76,750 230,580 782,300 77,260 231,170 0 77,250 238,240 (552,600) -70.6% 500 0.6% 7,660 3.3% 859,930 1,090,730 315,490 (544,440) -49.9% 555,800 74,970 475,240 4,900 75,450 479,180 553,000 75,460 542,800 (2,000) -40.8% 490 0.6% 67,560 14.1% 1,106,010 5^9,530 1,172,060 66,050 11.3% 105,820 100,970 119,270 13,450 12.3% 2,071,760 zsBaexaBcar 1,759,230 1,606,820 (464,940) :BSBsaaiKSB = s K BB = = a s s SB s Bs aaaassnssasBB 26.4% tSBSS III r m or ORONO umitRAL rUMD RBVBNUBS TJUtBS OBMBRAL rnoPIRTY TAXES 8PBCIAL LBVY-SBNBR A8MNT8 CITY BLDG LIVY-TAX ABATEMENTS PBMALITIE8 A INTEREST ON DELINQUENT TAXES LZCBMSES A PERMITS POLZCa TONH AID mxa TRAIHIMO REIN NMICIPAL STATE AID STREETS MM/ORAMTS mOM LHCD/DNR CPWry ORAMT«RECYCLIMO PROGRAM »igi,fo^tyiCT8 OnmAL SERVICE PEES PLRW,CRECE A SITE EXAM PEES A SUBDIVISION FEES PPgMCTED INSPECTION SERVICES OaiTR R CTED ANIMAL CONTROL pORnMCnD PUBLIC MORES SERVICES UECnOM PILING PEES iPiTOL POLICE SERVICES POLia REPORTS palm _^^im pees RMflUlitRATIVE CHARGES TO OTHER FUNDSassbesmbht searches W'BRMZTS/SAC ADMIN PEES PIHES A fORPEIT<^cowtr pines EgiMiL IMPOUND PEES fEXTORES/OONPISCATIONS "‘I^S^IU eRR|M I' BSi OP PROPERTY.! whmmm dividends rniARSPBRS IN-PIR PUND O O/L PUND (< POND SALANCP LIGHTS) ^ TOTAL 1990 ACTUAL 1,572,789 0 11,789 136,552 4,862 0 70,953 6,440 31,432 0 19,023 925 53,852 34,572 5,613 23,160 582,913 6,106 3,237 0 16 10,949 1,067 1,250 5,600 2,800 205 26,074 69: 97,095 990 10,146 500 ^,400 8,566 8,057 * 740 20,077 147,104 0 1991 BUDGET 1992 BUDGET 1992 BUDGET OVER/UNDER 1991 BUDGET AMOUNT 1,644,831 5,910 0 6,499 123,300 6,000 0 69.000 6,700 60.000 5,000 34,000 1,000 50.000 33.000 10.000 28,750 584,600 5.000 3,200 1.000 10 5,700 1,000 2,300 9,540 2,750 200 32,000 450 110,000 650 7,500 53,300 5,400 4,300 5.000 2.000 17,680 102,690 0 1,644,831 5,630 6,220 9,999 115,000 5,000 0 72,150 5,200 65,000 0 38,250 1,000 50.000 31.000 6,000 35.400 604,450 5.000 3.200 1,500 0 9.000 1.000 1,500 9,260 2.200 200 32.400 500 100,000 1,000 7,500 46,500 5,400 4,300 8,000 2,000 17,650 105,800 70,290 0 /280) 6,220 3,500 (8,300) (1,000) 0 3,150 (1,500) 5,000 (5,000) 4,250 0 0 2,000 4,000 6,650 19,850 0 0 500 0 800) 280' 550 0 400 50 (10,000) 350 0 (6,800) 0 0 j,000 0 3,il0^ 70,290 0.0% 53.9% -6.7% -16.7% 0.0% 4.6% -22.4% 8.3% 0.0% 12.5% 0.0% 0.0% -6.1% -40.0% 23.1% 3.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 57.9% 0.0% -34.8% -2.9% -20.0% 0.0% 1.3% 0.0% -9,1% 53.6% 0.0% 12.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.0% 0.0% f vsaasa2,971,547 3,040,260 3,129,330 89,070 ~7~Z% ll^', ,,, W CAPPROJF CITY OP OROMO CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS REVENUES ■ -- t j. , S :■ 1992 BUDGET OVER/UNDER 1990 ACTUAL 1991 BUDGET 1992 BUDGET 1991 BUDGET AMOUNT % MUNICIPAL STATE>A1D CONSTRUCTIONt STATE AID POP. CONSTRUCTION STATE AID FOR BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 816 0 160,000 400,000 1,000,000 560,000 840.000 160.000 525.0% 40.0% 816 ■^0s«BSsasaB« 560,000 z=;«ss = asR«Ksss 1,560,000 BsaesBsaasBaa 1,000,000 esBssaBBsaasa s= 178.6% PBIMANEIIT IMPROVEMENT REVOLVING t SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS s C RO 15 STREET LIGHTS NOOOaiLL AVENUE IMP MASAIIDOUS BUILDINGS OTHER IMTBRBST INCOME TRANSPBRS IN-FROM GENERAL FUND TRANSFERS IN-FROM MSA FUND 22,319 3,308 4,888 1,526 5S,8bO 30,000 0 17,580 2,050 7,b00 0 54,000 0 0 17,650 820 0 0 45,800 0 0 (7,500| 0 (8,200) 0 0 -0.2% -71.2% -100.0% -15.2% 117,891 82,030 SHiarBaBB =c aa at = = a 64,270 (17,760<-21.7% ..V 4'r, ^ •. 4 ty. 'V - -yV^ Vit . > /yr I _ 4:- • - 90DEBIT CXTT or ORONO OUT SBRVICB FUNDS REVENUES 19S6-76 XHPROVBNENT BONDS TRXIS OmBRAL PROPERTY TAXES PBMALTXES S XNTERBST ^ IIITBRB8T XN< X9B0 xmprovbhbnt bonds I TIUtES . OBMBRAL PROPERTY TAXES PniALTIBt A XNTSREST fS5Si2fe.^?2S2!P**’*^mTBRBRT INCOMEI'" 1990 ACTUAL 1991 BUDGET 1992 BUDGET OVER/(UNDER) 1992 1991 BUDGET BUDGET AMOUNT % 3,967 0 35,694 36,302 0 0 0 24,200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (24,200) 75,963 24,200 (24,200) 0.0% 0.0% -100.0% -100.0% !S3 = = =!9S!»S5r;: 17,143 41 75,295 36,122 17,300 0 56,600 29,100 16,600 0 50,830 34,600 (500) 0 (5,970) 5,500 -2.9% 0.0% -10.5% 16.9% XM2 XNPROVBmtllT BONDS ORWRAL PMPBRTY TAXES iPiCXjg A8RBSMBNT8 XRTBRBRT : 128,601 0 14,450 10,335 103,200 J02,230 isss: (970)-0.9% sssassassat:saaassssai 5,500 5,050 6,450 5,500 4,440 8,200 5,500 (610) 1,750 100.0% -12.1% 27.1% 24,765 11,500 18,140 :=sss9ssssass 6,640 57.7% :s59s = as=BsaBs s s ssaaaaaassa I IMS IMPROVEMENT BONDS •■■■RAL PROPERTY TAXES MMRLTXES A INTEREST XAL MSESSMIMTS EMRTS-CXTY PROP ST XNOOMB 34,527 40,000 50,000 10,000 25.0%189 0 0 0 0.0%41,298 34,680 32,350 (2,330 -6.7%6,20C 5,910 5,630 (280 -4.7%14,115 9,150 10,050 900 9.8% 96,329 89,740 98,030 8,290 9.2% TB3S = = 9 = S = S9S;sassaeascascss r.m I ..¥'Si'.rep CITY or OIKMO UlTIKritZSI FUNDS RBVBNUBS MNTBN OFBRATXNG FUND NBTBII SALES - ARBA 1 NATBR 8.XB8 - ARBA 2 MATBR SALB8 - ARBA 3 MATBR BALBS-ARBA 4 TOTAL NATBR 8ALB8 ••• vt^ io^^Sanbous rbvbnub TOTAL RBVBNUB CREDIT FOR DEPRECIATION ON CONTRIBUTED ASSETS TOTAL RBVBNUB A CREDITS PROM OPERATIONS DBBT SBRVICBtTABBB •FBCIAL ASSBSSNBirrsINTEREST II Total rbvbnub a bond proceeds prom debt service Total rbvbnub a bond proceeds prom construction •adjustbd 1990 ACTUAL 1991 BUDGET 1992 BUDGET OVER/UNDER 1992 1991 BUDGET BUDGET AMOUNT % 109,663 123,430 127,200 3,770 3.1% 40,160 40,770 41,400 630 1.5% 9,466 11,970 11,970 0 0.0% 0 1,750 *5,250 3,500 200.0% 159,289 177,920 185,020 7,900 4.4% 9,510 9,500 9,500 0 0.0% 2,275 500 1,500 1,000 200.0% 171,074 187,920 196,820 8,900 4.7% 33,329 33,330 *33,330 0 0.0% 204,403 221,250 230,150 8,900 4.0% as93sa«Bss9=:s SSSS9BSBSK33Ba 0 0 *0 051,076 22,570 R 19,920 (2.650)-11.7%22,391 10,500 15,200 (3,300)-17.8% 74,267 41,070 35,120 (5,950)-14.5% ssssaasaaiasss aaaaasBaaaaaa m e:aBB3BB33BZa MW i111.aaaaaaaaaa 71,603 15,000 0 (15,000)-100.0% 71,603 15,000 0 (15,000)-100.0% SSS3SSBBSSSSS esssasBZBSBsss SBBSSBBBSaiRI 3 S ■ VIII 90enterp CITY or OROMO V MTIRPRISB FUNDS RBVBMUES LIj 4 1 ^ ■iL OFBRATING FUND U8BR CHAROBS UNIT CHMI0B8 NNOC-CVC-INTBRBST NNOC^DIFBRRBD GAIN ZRTBIIB8T ZMOONB NXSGBLLAHBOOS INOOMB CRBDIT FOR DBFRBCXATZON ON CONTRIBUTED ASSETS TOTAL RBVBNUB A CREDITS FROM OPERATIONS DBBT SBRVICBt TAZB8 8PBCIAL A8SB88NBNTS ZHTBRB8T IN TOTAL RBVBNUB A BOND PROCEEDS FOR DEBT SERVICE OONBTRUCTIONt INTEREST INCOME TOTAL RBVBNUB FOR CONSTRUCTION •AO^STBD 1990 ACTUAL 1991 BUDGET 1992 BUDGET 1992 BUDGBT OVBR/UNDBR 1991 BUDGET AMOUNT % 387,420 13,923 13,486 15,914 9,530 56,627 4,446 409,500 10,500 3,000 15,190 9,530 52,000 100 395,700 11,000 3.000 14,440 9,530 50,000 2.000 (13,800) 500 0 (750) 0 (2,000) 1,900 •3.4% 4.8% 0.0% -4.9% 0.0% -3.8% 1900.0% 501,346 499,820 485,670 (14,150)-2.8% 127,582 127,600 127,600 0 0.0% 628,928 627,420 613,270 (14,150)-2.3% SSSS8SSSSSSSS scbsssbsssbss 0 65,781 20,171 0 34,750 18,000 * 0 * 32,700 15,000 (2,050> (3,000) -5.9% -16.7% 85,952 52,750 47,700 (5,050)-9.6% asBsasssssssa 57,429 ssssscccassss 41,700* 20,850 (20,850)-50.0% 57,429 41,700* 20,850 (20,850)-50.0% a. m ^trasss :as = ='CSS :sss sscs:lasa SCI r* ■H 90ei1-v'fi"CUT or mono tnmiPitisB niNDs revenues i /V' POOlir OnilATIIllO FUND ««prTf FEES OMCMEIOHS OR088 PROFIT mXiMBHT RBMTRL8 iPTBfIltT XROQME MXECULMIEOIIS XNOONB TOTAL RBVBIfUB IXT FOR DEPRECIATION ON CCNITRIBUTBD ASSETSIM i < I ^ TOTAL REVENUE & CREDITS FROM OPERATIONS 1990 ACTUAL 1991 BUDGET 1991- BUDGET 1992 BUDGET OVER/(UNDER) 1991 BUDGET AMOUNT % 96,710 7,028 28,645 1,026 1,926 90,650 6,180 28,750 550 500 100,000 8,000 29,650 1,850 1,500 9,350 1,620 900 1,300 1,000 10.3% 29.4% 3.1% 236.4% 200.0% 136,135 126,630 141,000 14,370 11.3% 254 250 250 0 — 136,389 126,680 141,250 14,370 11.3% B3SSS:izsssasKi ;KSSKS3! ,'V M-'- i> m I s.^v &. P'-' fS‘, i '■■ fet- §P' ■ #■ ESTFUND CITY OF OMMO ESTItMTCO FUND lALAMCE/RETAIMED EARNIMGS 12-31-92 SPECIAL REVENLK FUNDS DEBT SERVICE FUNDS CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS FUND lALANCE 12/31/90 GENERAL IHP. I BUILDING 1966-76 I960 1982 1985 FUND PARR EQUIP 0/L CAP. 0/L IMP BONOS IMP BONO IMP BONO IMP BONO asassasssasasBssssvaasxsssvsBsssasxBsassasassaaa aaarsassrss2srssa=a2==32=rssssss=sss=3araaas===s 1,039,080 214,930 217,610 2,221,550 NUN 1C PERN la* STATE AID REVOLVING sss=2sss333sss33assaaaaa EST. KimUES 1991•2,919,890 44,000 25,350 169.640 EST. EXPCNOItURES 1991 1 2.964.220 0 61,350 312,300 TRANSFERS IN 1991 120.370 0 60,750 349,410 TRANSFER GUT 1991 60.750 0 0 102,690 FUND BALANCE 12/31/91 1.054,370 256,930 242,360 2,325,610 EST. KVEHUES 1992 2,935,590 45,000 21,200 160.000 EST. EMPEMDITURES 1992 3,066,530 6,100 122,500 0 TRANSFERS IN 1992 123,4>0 0 62,800 0 TRANSFER OUT 1992 62,600 0 0 105,800 FUND BALANCE 12/31/92 984,060 297,630 203,860 2.379.810 nm iAUMCE CQNPOIIENTS: w mm NRSERVEO FOR: PREMIB IT8« RBNNNCES TO OTMER "NT- 60,000 41,600 BItIRNATEO FOR: MCATION t REVERENCE yoaClNB CAPITAL PRaC IMPNOVtWENTS INP t EQUIP OUTUTS aaic BLOB GONSR A CAP 0/L 120,000 700,000 297,830 203,860 2,379,810 BEBT SERVICE BBRB/BRIBSI PROJ BMBaBHClES UNBEBIONATEO 62.480 fOfAi FUNS BALANCE 964,060 297,830 203,860 m m 2.379,810 4C6.940 17,200 154.730 0 349,410 502,010 103,200 110,540 0 0 139,430 17,000 36,380 0 0 156,550 89,740 102,610 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 494,670 102,230 104,420 0 0 116,050 16,140 31,410 0 0 143,660 96,030 109,000 0 0 492,460 104,760 132,710 492,480 104,780 132,710 0 492,460 104,780 132,710 xasaaaaaaxa sasaaaaaaaa aeaaaaaasra aaaaaaxaaxa (1,360)662,530 0 82,030 0 5,000 0 0 10,000 17,680 8,640 721,880 1,560,000 64,270 1,560,000 50,000 0 0 0 17,650 8,640 aaaaaaaaaa 718,500 aaaaaaaaaai 8,640 185,900 479,700 52,900 S.640 718,900 * 1. '4 I i iJ tr'<»1cm or OMONOBSTIIATIO MITAIMED EARNINGS 12-31-91?;.h WATER SEWER GOLFEARNINGS 12-31-90 •if. IIIVINUBS 1991 ^•■T. nrSMBBS 1991 i^flANiRM IN 1991 tmmmt out 199i 'iBfAXI BAIfNIIIOS 12-31-91 r:.r BSf. REVENUES 199K ¥i 1i BSf. EXPENSES 1992 (2) NET DEPRECIATION -OP 1992 TEANSPER8 IN 1992 TEANSPER OUT 1992 EARNINGS 1992 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES EXCLUDED CAPITAL EXPENDITURES EXCLUDED EST. CAEN 12-31-92 id -■/ps. ifei-. MM • ■■ ,A ssasxssss3ssss:&fi = =153,200 = = = = S = SZS£t£ = S=S£:: =1,313,540 mm warn mmrnm «■» ^m mtm m62,690 243,990 594,270 126,630 269,630 422,530 104,470 5,470 4,500 4,250 0 0 0 0 0 0 122,090 1,480,780 100,600 265,270 554,220 141,000 276,690 ^^6,160 114,770 5,470 4,500 4,250 0 0 0 0 0 0 105,200 1,544,340 122,580 782,30> L 232,170 7,700 6^9,500 1,10. 500 6,080 27,900 46,200 /II 1^-'CITY OF ORONOTJUl CAPACITY VALUIS, TAX LEVIES. AND TAX CAPACITY RATES ACTUAL 1991 VS. ESTIMATED l992 COLLECTIBLE1991TAX CAPACITY $14,378,759 tsssss TAX LIVIES OmRAL •INXR A NATBR BONO DEBT BUILOINO BOND - HRA $1,650,741 62,600 TOTALS 1,713,541 TAX CAPACITY RATE OEMSRAL SEWER BOND DEBT BUILOINO BOND - HRA 11.430% .435% 0 TOTALS 11.865% :SS=3aSSB = SSSit5 COLLECTIBLE1992$13,280,120 tassss $1,656,681 72,300 158,000 1,886,981 12.475% .544% 1.190% 14.209% r: = =:sK = Br:8saswi (DECREASE)INCREASE(1,098,639) BS3Sa««SSS3S~ $5,940 9,500 158,000 173,440 1.045% . 109% 1.190% 2.344% TAXCAP(7.6)% .4% 15.1% 10.12% 9.1% 25.1% 19.8% JBUGT cm or OMMO 01 CCIKItAL FUND PtOG 020 DIV 11 CITY COUNCIL Page 1 P. 4100 4142 «,41SS (■ ■I'- **** t 4240 •*** 4300 4304 k-;t‘ U,;., 4322 4323 4340 V: 4356 U Sw SMJUIlES-REONJUt EMPLOYEE MCA/MDCR-CITT COMTRIt UORKNANS COMP IMMANCE TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES OPFICC SUPPLIES •OOKS I PERIOOICALS TOTAL SUPPLIES MAIN REPAI AUDITING t FINANCIAL OTHER CONSULTING 1991 1992 1992 1992 1989 1990 1091 Y-T-0 EST OEPT MGR COUNCIL ACTUAL ACTUAL AT ^ROP S-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOMMD ADOPTED REMARKS = ss*sa=ssssrss*»aa«*rs»rscsss = s2:s£s**s = = asr as = z = = as2srss*srr = 2 = ssssr=srsss:22ssssssssss==s = = 15200 15200 15200 5650 14720 15200 168 168 220 65 670 1170 540 546 590 573 580 600 15908 15916 16010 6506 15970 16970 0 0 ***************Ri*****as5**2ssssr sssssaasaaaassssssrsssaasssssssssssr srssss; 276 1M 200 190 0 200 466 BBsssaaai 9300 1S6 400 laasasssssssssi 9880 10400 229 250 300 32 200 200 261 450 500 0 0 isaaaasssssssssssasssa sssasssssssssassss 3 0 10400 9770 TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 9300 9991 13400 0 10400 9770 4S21 POSTAGE 1515 36 100 SC—SSSSSS 0 100 100 TOTAL CGWRMICATIQNS 1515 36 100 0 100 100 PRINTING 6 PUM.ISNING AMERTISING TOTAL '‘IINTINC-PUSLISH-AO NAINT OFFICE EQUIPMENT TOTAL CONTRACT MAIN-REPAIR MEETINGS-GONF-SCNOOLS TOTAL OTNER CONTRACT SERV 0 0 ***®®***3S saaasassa s sss 3 sssaaa s sssass assrssssssssasssaassssasssaasssssssss 529 63 500 46 500 500 462 165 0 100 100 991 226 500 46 600 600 0 0 *«B*«SBaaaaaaaaaaaasssss3BssaaaasasasssasBxssss8ssss3S3xasa 8S33 86 93 100 0 100 100 86 93 100 0 100 100 0 0 586 586 isaaasssss 774 rssBssscsassssssssssssssssssasasss: 1200 964 1150 1200 1200 964 1150 1200 0 0 :aassssssxrsax33Sassssss*28SBS3S3ss3ssss = = sr = 3;4380 MEMWRINIPS 37974 32076 36070 16620 36070 48B NBTIHG EXPENSES 435 107 500 25 450 4IPS SPEC EQUIP REPLACEMENT 103 74 150 n 100 4989 OTNER CNARQIS 167 170 MM TOTAL OTNER CHARGES 38512 32257 36720 16812 36790 lUc 0 MeMSERSNlPS rjm 9tOG 020 Dtv 11 CITY COUNCIL TOTAL MOUNTS TNIS DIVISION I. 39790 000 ■■■“***•■■»■■•■«««*»»»»»«« m>ssa>ssssesazasc:s=z=c!; = = 3 •• m==a = s»=3aEaiz = a 67364 59451 65430 24593 65560 68530 0 0 ■■■aaasa Bsaaaaaa aaasaaaa acasasaa ssssssss ssssaasa aasaaaasss ssesesss 1991 1992 LNCO 29175 32100 AMM 1995 1940 INC 4 750 4550 OTHES 150 100 TOTAL 36070 38690 aassssssa ta«a Page 1 cm or otoM 01 flCHEML FUN) M06 039 OlV 12 MmiNISTIMTION Page 2 r t r ;■ fi. w 4100 4111 4120 4140 4141 4142 41S1 4102 41SS 4304 *: 1909 ACTUAL 1990 ACTUAL 1991 1991 V-T-0 EST APPAOP 5-31-91 ACTUAL 1992 1992 1992 DEPT MGR COUNCIL REQUEST RECOMMO ADOPTED REMARKS SALAtlES-RCflULAR EMPLOYEE OVERT IME-KOUUUt EMPLOYEE RALARIES-TEMP EMPLOYEES ICMA-CiTV CONTRIIUTION PERA-CITT COHTRtRUTiaN MCA/WCR-CI1T CONTRIRUTION NOIPITALIZATION oNSURANCE LIPl'iNRURAilCE UOROWMS COMP INSURANCE TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES *»***»***»******s»**a»s*s****«*sssK«asr8ssrs«sssrr*rssas**ssst=r*=*E=s3asr2?:sc=ss2r*ss2rs=ss*rcs=»e 110010 1125^117000 47823 11B910 121620 178 149 200 99 150 200 m 67 0 0 2373 3604 3940 1417 3990 0 2453 2531 2610 1112 2670 5680 7856 6337 6560 4322 6770 9180 8312 9169 10500 4446 10670 12530 54 fS 110 42 110 110 1850 2060 2430 2111 2550 2600 133086 139428 145370 61459 147620 152120 aa***a»asaa>ssaBBaas9aaassasaEKa8SC33aasxs'tssss3«ssssBxs8a8s : xasssr^aaa 4210 OFFICE SUPPLIES 3U20 '.029 2500 1112 3300 3450 4240 ROOKS 8 PERIODICALS 177 0 400 469 500 500 MM 'OTa SUPPLIES-NAIN-REPA 3 'T 4029 2900 isei 3800 3950 OTHER GOHIULTIIIQ SERVICES TOTAL PROFESSIONAL KRVICE aaaaax aaaaaaasaaaaaaaas:: 660 4024 3500 «3Sa33XSZX3SSa:r=3CS£SB3333aSS8 3000 660 4024 3500 980 U 3000 0 •■■■•••■•*a»aaaaaaa3aaaaa»jcc*aaascBB 23 r aaBraaaaaEBaeaBBaassBaaaaarraa i-43»?r €766 1030 900 323 900 900 4»1 906 ao 1702 1300 571 T350 1400 MM TOra COMMUNICATIONS 1706 2732 2200 694 2250 2300 r ■aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaeeasxzesaxaaass&sss =B3SS«SSBS=SSSXS=S3B£==S • XXSSSSXSSS 4322 PRINTINB 4 PIBLISNINQ 1196 2144 1230 1477 1600 2000 4m AOVERTISINS 219 279 260 260 i-MM TOra PRIHTING-PUOLISH-AO 1196 236^1230 1756 2060 2280 0 0r.'rxxsr = rrrscs f 4340 NAINT OFFICE ENUIPMENT 2318 3060 2360 1219 3000 300C !4342 «t!8T NIK ENUIPMENT 38 0 0 MM TOra CONTRACT NAIM-MPAI 2316 3098 2380 1219 3000 3000 0 0 Rxaaaaaaai raax4 aaz Z3aasaaaxsaaaaa;jar aaaaaraarzaaassssa •1 WmtlL FUa PROS 039 OlV 12 ADMINISTRATION !■ Page 2 i I L 43S2 ♦355 ♦356 ♦370 Page 3 106IS-A0MIN SERVICC DATA MtOCESSING TOTAL DATA PROCESSIliC 1989 1V9C ACTUAL actual sszssassrft*-.. 1991 APPROP ^S! 1991 y-T-0 EST 5-31-91 ACTUAL 1992 1992 1992 DEPT MCA COUNCIL AEQUEST RECOMMD ADOPTED :asrsrs = = 5~.* = 3srss=s2 = r = = = = = s = s = r = s = = = = rrrrr = REMARKS rs = r = r = r = c.5r = ssrt:3z 0 > ssscas««BBBsas3a»fc. 24 80 100 36 120 150 60 200 250 0 0 - -s»’3*a2scsrsa««ess2=Etassass = ;ssas = = 2srrs = t = raas = r = 3 = = NEETI'.jS-CQNF-SCNOOL 1041 772 2160 739 1000 1800 TOTAL OTHEA CONTAACT SEAVICE 1041 772 2160 739 1000 1800 0 llAilllTY IttMANCC aacBssss 1027 ***3*s*sasas»*2a2saB*srsa*cr 3aa:-ss*r sr a = r axr-racr =srarrrararrarss 1190 1230 1130 1190 ♦373 EOUIPNENT riOATEAS INSUAANCE 165 165 170 0 170 170 ♦375 •ONDS INSUAANCE 130 30 70 0 0 30 ♦377 UMSAELLA IIAIILITT INSUAANCE 1465 1470 1510 0 1510 1510 ♦379 INSUAANCE A6EAT Of KCOAD 129 129 150 0 160 160 *##«TOTAL INSUAANCES 2936 2984 3130 0 2970 3060 0 ♦MO MOKASAIPS BBaaaaaBSBaaaaaBsxBssssaBrTBBBBsaaaaaaaaaaaaaasarasaaaaaaaaaaaaaassasaaez 1942 1744 2100 907 2100 2100 ♦311 TAAVEl-HILEAOE-PAAVINC 3069 3999 4400 1782 4300 4500 ♦302 IKETIM E«' MSES 10 410 200 41 200 200 4M3 LICENS* * A TAXES 30 0 0 4393 I SPEC.EWIP AEPUCEMENT 661 1222 1000 429 1200 1300 «*##TOTAL OTAEA CNAAGES %5682 7407 10 3259 7800 8100 0 - * :9laaaasasssatassaaaaa.ItIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMftl«MHIINUIINIfNHHIITOTAL AMOUNTS THIS DIVISION 151822 1668:.7 170570 71947 173420 179860 0 0 *Ba»a»*a*xesas***r=s3B*Bsa3SB«aBaarssss8aa3ax33X3ss3ssx332ra«sss aasaacss M OENfiAL HMD PA06 039 DIV 12 aDMINISTAATION Page J [1 r- 'r ■:^:r %■, li>:- cm Of OKMO 01 OCNEML FUNO MOO 040 DIV 13 ELECTIONS Page 4 ■4100 4111 4120 4141 4142 1 4210 {. V' f- \4306 i' #*#« is 4321 \r f-#«#• r 4322 r’-'"*#*«r i. 4340 4342 4JM **** 4301 4|t2 4Jf3 1991 1992 1992 1992 1989 1990 1991 Y-T-D EST OEPT MGR COUNCIL ACTUAL ACTUAL APRROP S-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOMHD ADOPTED REMARKS BSS«asaB«csss&ss5ses3SSSsssssssssssrrs = =;£Ss = rrss = r^ss£ = s = : = = = = zr = = rS3SSSS ssss=rzs = 3zsssr = = ssssss = =s lALARieS-REGUUUI EMPLOYEE OVERTIME-KOULAR EMPLOYEE MLMIEf-TEMP EMPLOYEES PERA-CITY CONTRIIUTION nCA/iaCR-CITY CONTRIt TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES OmCE SUPPLIES TOTAL SUPPLIES-MAIN-REPAIRS OTNCR CONSULT INS SERVICES TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POITAOE TOTAL OOataiCAIlOHS PRINTIM 0 PU0LISNIN6 TOTAL PRINTINQ-PUNLISH-AO HAINT tfPICE EOUIPMENT NAIHT MIS EQUIP TOT.U rONTRACT MAIN-REPAIR MEETINOS-OONF-SCNOOLS TOTAL OTNER CONTRACT SERVICE TRAVfL-NILEAOC-PARKIMG miet Inq expenses SPEC EQUIP REPUCEMENT TOTAL OTNER CHARGES 394 3729 1550 108 1560 4330 372 0 0 400 4947 0 0 6580 17 184 70 5 70 210 22 38S 120 120 460 433 9617 1740 113 1750 11980 0 0 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaassaaaeassBsassssaasssszs'^ssszzszzzzzEzsassszassz 386 0 0 1000 0 386 0 0 0 1000 0 0 aaaaaaaaaaBaaasaaaaBaassBssaaasssBsssrEsssss==szsszBsrszzz3sszsa*BZ33s«s 0 0 00000000 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaBaasaaaBBsasBSBSBaasssBsrsnsasBzBssssBBSssaasBBazssss 82 428 200 107 200 1000 82 428 200 107 200 1000 0 0 100 0 0 430 0 100 0 0 0 430 0 0 IB. ASS3S3=S==333=3333S3SSSS5S3=SS=SSS3ZrSS£3 8 142 0 0 0 330 632 0 0 2080 8 774 0 0 0 2410 0 0 aaaaBaaaBaaaaaaaBaasaaaBzsaaassasaBBSsssssBssssBsasssasssBSBasasBBSBBSBB 9 41 so 0 0 100 9 41 so 0 aaBsaaaaassBassBaaBsaassBszrsBr S3 s:: 27 100 50 0 18 79 0 0 0 0 100 100 20 ISO i 0' P# L; TOTAL ANDUHTS TNIS DIVISION 01 GENERAL FUND PROG 040 01 V IS ELECTIONS 37 197 TO 0 0 300 0 0 aasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaassaBaaaaBBBSssBsasBBSSBBBBssrsassaaassaBBBsBBBaBsa 569 11S43 2060 220 19S0 17220 0 0 aaaaaaaa aaaasaaa BssBaBsa bbbbbbbb bbsbssss sbsbbbzs ssszsssz bzszszzs Page 4 I «iuUUUl I cm Of ORONO 01 fiEKRAL FUND PROG 059 DIV U ASSESSING Page 5 4100 4111 4^20 4141 4142 4151 4152 It 4151 4210I m.. N- I. 4140 4307 MLMIES-REGUtM EMPLOYEE OVERT IME-OEOHAII EWLOYEE SALAftlES-TEMP EMPiOTEES PERA-CITY OOiTRliUTlON FICA/MOCR-CITY CONTRIRUTION N0SPITAU24T10I1 INSURANCE LIEE imURANCE IRNIRINyit COMP INSURANCE TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES OEFICE SUPPLIES NOOKS A PERIODICALS TOTAL iUPPlIES-NAIN-REPAIRS ASSESSING SERVICES TOTAL PROfESSIONAL SERVICE 1991 1992 1992 1992 19S9 1990 1991 Y-T-D EST DEPT MGR COUNCIL ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 5-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOMMD ADOPTED ass«a8sssrsssscss3ssss£ = 3s==csss = ===s = s = = s = = r = sr7s = s = srcsrsss:£sssssc = s = = = r = r r 1100 9S6 1240 529 1190 1120 REMARKS =====£3as=£==£=== 50 75 30 37 63 60 100 5 15 0 0 50 90 0 0 0 0 0 50 90 0 0 0 1267 1086 UOO 349 1330 1260 0 0 SXBSaSSaSKeaSBacaBXSB!12SSSSr.SSSSXS8SS3SeSSSSSaSS3SSSSSSSSSS£S3SS3SSSSS = S 979 1599 1300 539 1350 1420 979 1631 1350 539 1350 1470 0 0 3att333S3«aB3SB3«B33SSSSSaSSSSSSSSSS8SS3SS3S3S3SSSSrS333X3SSSS33SS3S3==3 S 71064 64733 66000 27500 66600 66400 71064 64733 66000 27500 66600 6P400 0 0 B8«S33a3*3333333333a83SCS33SaS3S33SS8SaS33B3333rs3S333XX33- XSXXXXSXXXXXX 4320 TELEPNGNC 687 948 970 316 950 1000 4321 POSTAGE 1440 892 1270 129 1270 1300 •M*TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS 2127 1840 2240 445 2220 2300 0 0 9RINTIIM 4 PURUSHING ADVCRTISIM TOTAL PRINTING-PURL ISH-AO IJUIPMINT 4 NAC KNTAL TOTM. RENTALS aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaassseaasaassaassascsssssassBsrsssnzBsssBsasas 3R0 763 450 291 450 750 598 763 450 305 470 750 0 0 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaacsasassaaaazBssBSBSBasBszsBssssssszsssssBsassBSBZB 50 50 50 0 SO 0 50 50 0 0 tSSS88aS8aS8a8a8SSaS3BSSS8asSttSS=S=CB=BS:SBBSSSSSSSSezs=£B£3 »: t SI mUML nia prog 0S9 div u askssing f ■St«,„RNI, m Page 5 LNfiUlXiT CITT or ORONO 01 CCNCRAL FUND PROG 069 DIV 15 FINANCE Page 7 4100 4111 4141 4142 4151 4152 4153 4210 4240 4300 4300 I ##♦# f.- ■ —\ . tw: 1991 1992 1992 1992 1989 1990 1991 Y-T-0 ESI DEPT MGR COUNCIL ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 5-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOMMO ADPOTEO = a**SSSS*Bcar== = rrrsr = = = = r = = r= = = srsssr = r = = srs = = rsr = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = REMARKS z=ss==r=s5s=sss=sa SAUUIIES-REOULAR EMPLOYEE OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEE PERA-CITY CONTRIRUTION FICA/N)CR-CnV CONTRIIUTION NOSPITALIZATION INSURANCE LIFE INSURANCE WORKMANS COMP INSURANCE TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES nOKS A PERIODICALS TOTAL SUPPLIES-HAIN-REPAIRS AUDITING A FINANCIAL OTREt CONSULTING TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 79758 87049 92310 38917 95920 98750 17 29 0 0 3460 3899 4140 1743 4300 4420 6007 6654 7060 3090 7340 7560 5454 6379 7020 3030 7280 7350 289 295 310 127 310 310 370 390 510 435 440 540 95355 922 104695 111350 47342 13333333X833======33=333X3833 925 1200 210 115590 ==5C=== 1000 118930 0 ===========333=3== 1100 0 ========= 246 250 91 250 250 1168 925 1450 301 1250 1350 0 0 SSXSB&SSSBSSSSS = = =SSSSSSSBSSSSSSSSS83 = = = = = s = s = =xs= sss = r = = ssrzss = 3 = = = = = = = 3636 3675 3800 3800 3800 3636 3675 3800 50 3800 3800 0 0 »««**BB3BS3 = = = SSS = 33S = r3333333S = 3 = = = = = = 333 = = = = = = SS = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = S = = = 4S20 TELC^IKMC 345 484 550 158 550 550 4121 pwm 734 927 960 391 960 1000 ••••TOTAL COmUNICAT IONS 1079 1411 1510 549 1510 1550 0 0 iXSS383BBS=S3SB8S = 3 3SS8S3S3 8S38SS=r33SrZSS = 3 = 4122 PtlNTING 1 PUillSNIiiC 504 227 600 457 600 600 TOTAL PffINTINQ-PUtLISN-AD 504 227 600 457 600 600 0 0 4340 NAINT OFFICE EOUIPNENT **** TOTAL CONTRACT MAIN-REPAIR aBSSSSSSXSaSSS38aSSKS’^SBBSSS = ZSBSSBaSSS = 333S = = 3 = -SS = S = 3 = = S = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 691 954 770 218 950 1000 691 954 770 218 950 1000 0 0 ■■•SSSaBaaaaSSI8SSZ===3SS8a8=SS==3BX3=S3=SS=======SS=Z====S33SSr==3SS33S3 01 GENERAL FUND PROG 069 DIV 15 FINANCE Page 7 ‘-■•vrr ■ ¥ t' . *> \K- ¥ ii- te Page 8 1909 ACTUAL 1990 ACTUAL 1991 APPROP T-T-D 5-31-91 1991 ESI ACTUAL 1992 1992 1992 DEPT MGR COUHCIL REQUEST RECOMMO AOPOTED 4SS2 IMIt-MNlN SCRVICC uaaassssaRarsaxssasaacsssssassBszsrsa 8161 9041 9360 3164 asassassza 9500 E3 = 3szssssss = s = = = r93sss3 = r z: 10250 4SSS OOUlin-MTA niOCCSSlNG 13 28 27 30 30 US4 IMIS-CUSS 2 ASSCSMENT 6782 4936 2900 2897 2900 5200 OSS MTA MOCEtSINQ 5m 6639 6000 2375 6850 7400 TOTAL MTA PNOCCSSlin 207S0 20644 18260 8463 19280 22880 0 0 4»«NEETINM-CONF • tCNOOlS Ml M7 9M 135 850 900 MM TOTAL OTNEH OONTAACT SEAVICE S41 847 900 135 850 900 0 0 4SfO NENINAL LIAtILITY INSURNACE 1026 1187 1230 3SS9SSSS8 rsss3a=3Ka 1130 iaasaas=s===s:=scsasxxcsszx 1190 4174 AUTOMOTIVE IMUMNCE 30 20 20 4S7S 90NDS imUIAMCE 12S0 1142 1180 1140 1180 4174 MONETS 4 SEOUNITT 40 50 40 50 4177 UMMELLA LIAAILITY INSURANCE 148S 1470 1520 1520 1520 4379 INSURANCE AGENT Of RECORD 64 62 80 90 90 *#♦#TOTAL inURANCES S82S 3931 4060 0 3940 4050 0 0 41M MMMRRNIM 90 15 SS9ZSS333 120 ccacasaaa 15 9 «• wm w m 100 :B = = = 9S?zssarr s = = 3S8ss?S3XS 100 4111 TRAVEL-MI LEAOE-NARK1NC 7S6 757 900 272 850 900 4193 SPEC EQUIP REPLACEMENT 205 265 360 56 350 350 4399 OTHER CHARGES so 110 70 70 70 MM TOTAL OTHER CHARGES•1M1 1147 1450 343 1370 1420 0 0 ralM. MOUNTS THIS DIVISION 128630 13M56 144150 57858 ssscsaaaac 149140 5 = B = B»sr3rss*as*s3*S2*r = rr3 156480 0 0 REMARKS !S£rSS3S=====r3Sr3=S35S£ Wi' i't' '<'■ - fc¥I •I 6EKUL n«» MM OM OlV IS PliMCf Page 8 ^‘■ %,:■■iV.-U L «* cm Of OKMO 01 OENCRAL nwo PROG 080 DIV 16 LEGAL Page 9 1 •1989 ACTUAL 1990 ACTUAL 1991 APPR09 T-T-O 5-31-91 1991 CST ACTUAL 1992 OEPT REQUEST SSSSSSB^S 1992 MGR RECOMNO aaszzzxBZ 1992 Ca.T4CIL ADOPTED zzzBZzaz: 4301 LCGAL-KETAItlEII 13465 13688 14700 3517 ^ w mm A A mm A 14100 14500 4302 LEGAL-PtOSea'TlOiS 132036 101196 125000 21527 95000 115000 4309 LEGAL-CQMSULflie tiiVICES 12482 576S4 25000 4466 20000 22500 4306 OTMEi COnULTIIlG 687 1000 0 MM TOTAL AtOTEttlOMAL SERVICE 157983 152538 164700 30399 130100 152000 0 0 REMARKS 4330 MM 4AIL CMRGM TOTAL OTHER OOHTkACT SERVICE sasvaBKBassssBaaBBSSxsvsamBSSssssasassasssxassssssrsssszsssasassasssssss 24U8 32018 AOOOO 5251 35000 LOOOO TOTAL ANOUMTI THIS OIVISIOH 24448 32018 40000 5251 35000 40000 0 0 aaaaaaaaaBaaaaaaaaaaaaaBasxasxaasaaaaaaaaaaasBassaasrzszzsaaassassssazcz 182431 184556 204700 35650 165100 192000 0 0 aaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa asaaaaaa saaaaaaa sssaaaaa asazBses aasssszx lEKRAL FUND PROG 080 DIV 16 LEGAL Page 9 1^ ^MMICITY or OMNO Page 10 01 GENERAL FUND OIV 17 GOVERIMENT BUILDINGS 1989 4100 4141 4142 42S1 42U 4MS 4SM *••• 4332 I:-. SALARIES-REGULAR EMPLOYEES PERA-CITY CONTRIBUTION FiCA/MDCR-CITY CONTRIBUTION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 0 BUM A GROUNDS MR SUPPLY EGUIPNENT PARTS A ACCES TOTAL SUPPLIES-MAINT-REPAIR ENGINEERING CONSULTING TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERV UTILITIES TOTAL UTILITIES OFFICE OR BUILDING RENTAL TOTAL nNTALS HAIRY RISC EQUIPMENT NAINT BLDGS A GROUNDS MNITORIAL SERVICE TOTAL CONTRACT NAINT-REPAIR PROPERTY IRSURANCE BOILER A NACNINERT INSURANCE TOTAL INSURANCES SPECIAL ASMNTS ON LAND TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY INT ON SPEC ASMNTS TOTAL OTNER DISBURSEMENTS TOTAL AHOUNTt TNIS DIVISION 4342 4343 434f 4371 4372 4333 4B34 1991 1992 1992 1992 1990 1991 T-T-0 EST OEPT MGR COUNCIL ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 5-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOMMD ADOPTED REMARKS = = = = 3S aassssaasassrsassxasss 4066 9040 10190 2422 10220 10580 266 405 460 1D9 460 470 456 682 780 780 810 6788 10127 11430 2531 11460 11860 0 0 ■■■■sxsssflFVMSaassaxaaxaexaaaaaaearaaaaaaaasaea 1477 2009 1500 606 1500 1500 155 242 100 156 160 150 1632 2251 1600 762 1660 1650 0 0 OMiasiMRiMMasaBassssBsaaaasaxaaaaaasaBaaaaaaaaasr rraaaaraaaarrrrararaaaaaaa 50 50 0 0 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 ••••••■■•■•■••^■•■•ssssxxaaaaBaseaaHsaaaaaaarxaass*22S223axr3aa»aaarr 3ta 90S1 8784 3121 10000 10000 9051 8784 10000 3121 10000 10000 0 0 taaasaaaaataaaaaaaa aaaaaaaararaaraeraaaarasararaaaaa aaam120120120 120 0 120 0 120 120 0 0 xaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaxaasaaaaaaaasaasaaaaaaaaaaasxaaaaaaaaaaasaa 542 1204 500 175 500 500 6738 5554 5000 2452 500C •0'-' 4920 4802 n-v 1825 ^00 7500 12200 11560 4)0 4452 13000 13000 0 0 ■•••aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaaaeaaaaaaaaaaaaaraBraarsaaaaaaaaaaararaacaara 1839 1391 1500 1510 1580 168 168 180 63 230 240 2007 1559 1680 63 1740 1820 0 0 sssaaeaaaaaazaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaxaaaaa 3000 3080 3080 3080 3080 1 3000 3080 3080 0 3080 3080 0 0 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasssaaaaaaasBa 3400 3120 2830 2830 2550 3400 3120 2830 0 2830 2550 0 0 aaaaaaaaaa«****»•'Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 33 3 38278 4048 43740 10979 43940 44080 0 0 aaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa eaaaaaas ssssassa aasaaaaa aaaaaaaa aaaaazsa •1 OnERAL FUND OIV 17 GOUERNNENT WILDINGS Page 10 !;.r- . ms^ r"f uQoudgtk city OF OMMO 01 CiKML FUND MKK 100 OIV 21 WVUN SERVICES Page 11 085 WMM SERVICE ORGATiJATIONS lOTAL OTHER CNAr.CES TOTAL AMOUNTS THIS DIVISION 1989 1990 ACTUAL ACTUAL 1991 APPROP 1991 T-T-0 EST 5-31-91 ACTUAL 1992 1992 1992 DEPT NCR COUNCIL REQUEST RECOHHO ADOPTED REMARKS srxB3SSSS9Br833ss=zeaxs3zzBsss3asscssssssssnzsssssssrsss=z=sxsrssssssss s Z3:z=rss3sssssss3 = sssss = :zs 10A54 11262 13980 6205 13760 U210 10454 11262 13980 8205 13760 14210 0 0 33333333333333333333 3333333333 3333 33333 3333358ZSrSSSZ 8333333338383333333 10454 11262 13980 8205 13760 14210 0 0 33333333 S8S3333S 8SSS33S3 3SS3SS3S 33333333 S33SSS8S S3S33SS3 Z3S3333S U. HCmi NUMAN SERVICE PLANNING 80ARD SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES yESTONKA SENIOR CENTER U*0-M AREA SENIOR CENTER U HENN PIONEER ASSN W. SUBURBAN MEDICATION CENTER LEAGUE OF MN HUMAN RIGHTS 1600 1600 4830 5030 4280 4450 2000 2060 500 500 soo 500 50 50 13760 14210 3SSSBZS3 33833333 01 iUKRAl FUND PR06 100 OIV 21 HUMAN SERVICES Page 11 i. I tw. k'l: trf 1Ur f'i-' iSv & ‘ V; P cm OF OMHO 01 fiCNIML FIND PROC 129 DIV 31 POLICE PROTECTION PagG 12 .'v' iV' 4100 4111 4120 4132 4136 4141 4142 4131 4132 4133 4134 MM 4303 4300 1991 1992 1992 1992 1909 1990 1991 Y-T-0 EST DEPT NCR COUNCIL ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 5-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOMMD ADOPTED REMARKS ■a«SBaBa9SSS»ss«8ssssssBse8SSBSftS3aiBZ3ss3sss = ss = = z = rs = = r = = = r = = s = r = = s = r = rr 3 = ;; = = sssrs = sssssszsc = = srs3 SLALRlES*REGUtAH EMPLOYEE 0VERT1NE*REGULAR EMPLOYEE SALARIES-TEMP EMPLOYEES HOLIDAY PAY-LELS OTHER PAY P^RiA-ClTY OOHTRIIUTIOi EICA/MDCt-ClTY CQHTIIUTIOM HOSPITALIZATION INSURANCE LIFE INSURANCE UOMOIAIIS OQNP INSURANCE UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 585411 607171 626100 248468 621430 649800 36020 34920 25000 14534 28000 25000 6245 5874 5370 2061 5560 5850 16630 16019 17050 17050 17750 4000 8600 4000 73763 75732 77280 30028 75340 80300 5213 5247 5660 2227 5340 6310 34273 37BB8 42930 17872 42900 48910 3703 1945 2760 442 2750 3150 26607 52593 36090 30131 30130 34800 7D9954 817309 842240 345763 837100 675870 «aaaa«ssa8sssssssssss*a«BaaB8aaaas38S3sss8sssssssss3S8SS7sss3 = = 9xrss‘. xxx 4216 OFFICE 6UPP11E6 7618 7646 7000 2443 7000 7000 4H6 NOTOR FUELt 4 LUMICANTS 24563 26828 28000 8936 27000 28000 6121 CLOYMIN6 4 PCR60NAL EQUIP 9835 9950 10000 4103 10000 10^00 4211 MJM 4 GROUNDS NU SUPPLY 442 250 400 893 1000 1000 4212 EOUIPMENT PARTS 4 ACCES 7322 5004 5000 1485 4500 5000 42M ■OOn 4 PERIODICALS 1769 979 1200 973 1000 1200 4241 TMIHIIK SUPPLIES 534 278 3800 894 2400 3800 4243 DARE PROGRAM 1805 600 1181 1800 1800 4244 K-9 008 PROGRAM 2303 2000 442 1800 1800 MM TOTAL aiPPLIES-NAIN-REPAIR 52003 55043 58000 21350 56500 59600 ■*8K8aasa8a8xsssssKBBS88«S8aas2esax=srzs5ssssssss:sssess3sssssrss33Ssxss USAt-dmULTINO SERVICES OTNEt OQNSULTINS KRVICES TOTAL PtOFEUIOHAL SERVICES 857 468 1500 1000 1500 6723 6274 7000 2424 7000 7000 7580 6742 6500 2424 6000 8500 0 0 ■BBBaBaaaaBXBBBB3BBBBBBBBB8«SXSS8BBBBSBSSBXSSSBS33S*3rSSBSZSB3ZZSSSesrs- lAL nao PMO 129 OlV 31 POLICE PROTECTION Page 12 W ti VMMi raw race 129 oiv 3) poucf ptoTecnoN Page 13 1991 1992 1992 1992 1989 1990 1991 Y-T-0 EST DEPT mgr council ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 5-3V91 ACTUAL REQUEST RCCOMMD ADOPTED aaaaaaaaaaaaasss3arBsaaBBaBB3*ssrsBaaB=a*saB33===ssssBs»rsBs=r=ss==s===sas 4320 TEiePNOliC 7419 6856 7500 4225 7500 7500 4321 POSTAGE 1686 1289 2000 1407 2000 210C TOTAL aSMJNI CAT IONS 928S 8145 9500 5632 V500 9600 0 0 ssBaaaaaaaaaaaaraBaasBBasBBBasBsssBBBaaassBBrsaasssBsssssBsrr5 ?raaaararr 4322 PtlHTlNG A PUNLISHING 5471 5543 4500 2381 5470 4500 4323 AOVCNTISING 30 0 0 TOTAL PNINTING-PUBUSN-AO 5471 5543 4500 2411 5470 4500 0 0 BaaaaaaaBaaaaaBBaBBBBBBaBaaaaaBaaaBaaaaBaBaaaaaaaasaaaaarr:==saaaarssr-:: 4324 UTILITIES 3429 3322 3600 645 3400 3400 ****TOTAL UTILITIES 3429 3322 3600 645 3400 3400 0 0 REMARKS ■«a«ttaaa««asa«KaaxsBassBxsa8ssessssssssBS3zssz=:sssssss«ses=s3ssssxssssr s 4330 MOlO RENTAL 7171 14736 16000 15500 17000 4332 OmCE ON iLDG RENTAL 10286 10138 10140 5069 10200 11400 ■ V [. 4340 TOTAL RENTALS NAINT OmCE EOUIPNENT 17457 24874 aaaBBaaaaaaaaaaBaa 2143 2868 26140 5069 25700 28400 0 0 aeaaaaaaaa8asBaaaBaB3aBBaaBza3eaBaBaaa3 83acr>zaaaaaaaa3 3500 1531 3500 3600 4341 NAINT AUTO EOUIPMENT 18509 16746 14000 7831 16000 14000 4342 MINT RISC EGUIPRENT 1935 1393 1500 686 1500 1500 4343 MINT SLOGS A GROUNDS 2722 1660 1500 698 1200 1500 ‘4349 JANITORIAL SERVICE 3502 3516 3500 965 3500 3500 TOTAL CONTRACT MIN-REPAIR 28811 26183 24000 11711 25700 24100 0 0 aaaaaaaaaaaaaxsaaBaaaaaaaaassssssaxxsaacassssassasrsssasss: 4352 LOGIf-AMlN SERVICE U90 5241 5500 1834 5500 5950 V* 4SM LOSIS-CLASS 2 ASSESSMENT 3650 3647 3650 3870 f 4»S DATA PROCESSING 9034 12170 8450 3949 12200 13200 PPM TOTAL DATA PROCESSING 13524 17411 17600 9430 21350 23020 WITlMCS-CniF'SCHaOiS TOIM. OTHER CONTRACT-SERVICE aaaaaaaaa^aaaaaaaaaaaaBaBaaBassaaaaaaaBaassssBsssssssaBBssBsssBBSssxasss 11382 9879 13500 3738 12000 15000 11382 9879 13500 3738 12000 15000 0 0 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasasasssaBsasssxasssssrssBSBESssBSBssssrszssssssss Page 13 i frI 1"4370 • . %4371 r 4371 4374 1- • 4377 i 4379 f ###• 4300 4301 4302 k 4303 B* ‘V p 4193 4399 L iv':v K .V 4320 4340 4330 Pago 14 QENCflM. LIMIIITV INSURANCE PMKR1Y INSURANCE EQUmCNT FLOATERS INSURANCE AUTOMOTIVE INSURANCE UNMEiLA LIANILITT INSURANCE INSURANCE A8ENT OF RECQM) TOTAL INSURANCES NEMKRSNIPS TRAVEL•NILEACE-RARKING NEETIN6 EXKNSES LICENSES A TAXES SKC ERUIP REPLACEMENT OTNER CHAROES TOTAL OTNER CNARCES lUILOlNQS A STRUCTURES OFFICE FURN'FIXT'EOUIP MITOHOTIVE EOUIFHENT OTNQI EOUIFHENT TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAT 1991 1992 1992 1992 1909 1990 1991 Y-T-0 EST DEPT MGR COUNCIL ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 5-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOMN) ADOPTED ^^••••■•■■■■■■•••■^•sarBarraaaaaraaaraaarrraararraaraacaaaraarraBaraaaars S! 9794 7792 8030 7930 8330 456 368 450 410 450 650 656 680 520 560 2444 3645 3650 2754 5100 3800 7530 7495 7T30 7730 8120 1034 979 1020 1080 1130 21888 20955 21560 2754 22770 22410 0 0 •■■■■■■■■**■*•»** **!s»*»*8*aaaaaaaa8aaaaaaaraaaaraa’^*taraaaa aaaaaaaa aaaaar a 1754 1245 1500 1245 1300 ..vO 644 956 650 94 550 650 333 450 350 148 250 550 781 121 180 104 180 180 27 23 20 3 20 20 30 32 50 30 30 3571 2827 2730 1594 2330 2430 0 0 REMARKS 1000 200 1000 1381 6168 1500 125 900 1500 32521 72472 33500 3196 31300 37200 3792 4254 6000 5500 5500 37694 82894 42000 3321 37900 4520U 0 0 REPLACE 3 SQUADS INCLUDING CNANGEOVER. NET OF 3 SOLD. 10 PROC)REPLACEMENT (1) RADAR UNIT, (2) PRINTENSELOCIS/ TYPEWRITER TOTAL AMOUNTS TNIS DIVISION ■■■■■■■■■■■■■»»»»»»*»a«*»*««s»»*»a«»e»=o9Sssas=sr=E==i==iasa*is*«as====r 1002129 1081207 ’073870 A158L2 1067720 1122030 0 0 aaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa asaaaaaa raaarara arasaass aaaaaaaa t1 flOHAl FUND PROG 129 DIV 31 PaiCE PROTECTION Page 14 %MbUlUUiT I CITT Of ORONO 01 amtUkl fiMD PROG 130*155 DIV 32 FIRE PR^'^CTIOR Page 15 1989 ACTUAL 1990 ACTUAL 1991 APPROP 1991 Y-T-D EST 5-31*91 ACTUAL 1992 DEPT 1992 MGR 1992 COUNCIL REQUEST RECOMMO ADOPTED aas J3t«ss7S59«x:sss5«sssB8SSSS:es3SS = = n:ss = = = = : = ss = = = = = = = r = = r REMARKS ;=3 = 3r = = = = = n < :'r P-- r;. ‘i.r AS15 FIRE SERVICES LONG *.AKE 89056 89988 99500 51820 105640 109000 4316 FIRE SERVICES MAPLE PLAIN 10650 11300 12500 12500 13150 4317 FIRE SERVICES NOI NO 55425 52185 60950 30474 60950 64000 4318 FIRE SERVICES UAYZATA 4672 5945 7020 3246 6490 6820 •••• %356 TOTAL PROFESSiaiAL SERVICE MEETinGS‘CORF * SCHOOLS 157803 159416 179970 ■SS3S3S8SSSSSSSSS===3SSSS== 50 85540 183580 ==ar*axc»x========== 50 192970 0 0 ========================= 50 TOTAL OTHER CONTRACT SERVICE 0 0 50 0 50 50 0 0 TOTAL AHOUNTS THIS DIVISION BS3*«x**a=B=s»x=====c*Bar==tx=xaB=ss=a==========r====a=====3==ra======== 1S7803 159416 180020 85540 183630 193020 0 0 ■XXKBBBX 35SSBSKS ====■■== «SeB3SS= ======== ======== ======== 3======= [IAL FIND MOG 130-TSS DIV 32 MAE PAOTE Page 15 \V-.; ..«■ 4cm OF OMNO 01 QEMERAL FUND PK06 174 DIV 33 FLANNIN6 AMD ZONING Page 16 •r 1991 Y-T-0 EST 5-31-91 ACTUAL 1909 1990 1991 ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP ■■•■■■■csssssxssssssszsaxrsBSBsssssssNtxsjisst^sszrrsassasasxx 1992 1992 1992 OFPT 0CR COURCIL REQUEST RECQMMD ADOPTED IBSSSSSSSBSSSZXSSXSSSSX REMARKS zs:ssszzzzzzz 4100 tAfAIEt-NEOUlAN EMPLOYEE 161620 163294 202900 80658 205200 213100 4111 OVEITINI-NEGUUUI EMPLOYEES 07 73 400 54 300 400 4110 SALARItt-fENP EMPLOYEES 9707 46 50 0 4141 Pfa-CI'T OONTtllUTIQN 6842 H71 9090 3632 9200 9570 4141 FICA/NDCN-CITY OONTNIIUTION 121S1 12691 15520 5174 15700 16330 41S1 NOSPITALIZATION INSURANCE 6927 9156 11800 5133 11800 12150 4151 LIFE IRIURANCC 78 64 90 33 80 80 4155 WORKMANS COMP INSURANCE 4200 43S0 62U0 5517 5520 6690 MHM TOYAL PERSONAL tfRVICES 191915 206736 246000 100247 247850 258320 BBBBaBBaBBBSSBBBSBBBBBBBBassXBZ 0 0 BaB«Z3BSZ9%s:szc3ass3Szszzz=zss===:rr 4110 OPFir* SUPPLIES 3872 4635 7300 1002 7300 7300 4110 1 MOTOR FUELS 4 LUSRICANTS 1345 1020 1290 319 1200 1290 4H1 aOTRINO 4 PERSONAL EQUIP k 152 250 250 250 4251 EOUIPMEHT PARTS 4 ACCES 267 50 420 39 420 420 4M0 ana 4 periodicals 707 228 570 27 570 570 ****TOTAL SUPPLIES-NAIN-REPAIR 6341 5933 9830 1387 9740 9830 0 0 4M5 U0AL-C0NSULTIN6 SERVICES 326 708 620 75 620 :ZZBZBZS8ZZ; 620 ZSZSZS8XZ ZZ888B 4S0I eaiHEERINQ CONSULTING 46 320 75 320 320 4508 OTMU CQNSULTIH8 SERVICES 7576 6303 8730 3307 8H0 8730 •M*TOTAL PROFESSIONAL KRVICES 7948 7011 9670 3457 9670 9670 0 0 >ax*xxxaaaaaaBsaBBaBZBBBBaaBBBBsssaasBB8S8S3zssz3B3sssass83sszss3ZBiJZ8ar4510TELEPHONE8641161110032611001100 4SH F08TAGE 2112 2493 2700 1172 2700 2700 •M.TOTAL COaUHICATIONS 2976 3654 3800 1498 3800 ^800 0 0 4511 POIHTINO 4 PUILISNIN6 1542 2967 1660 K2 1660 E83888SS88XX 1660 3 Z 8 ZZ88X 8B8S8Z 41a AOVUTItlNO 374 47 191 200 0 •M*TOTAL FNIliTIN6*PUaiSN-AO 1916 3014 1660 923 1860 1660 0 0 ‘»-*X*«*«X*»58Sa«aaBaaBB8S888ZZ*ZBB8BBB8BBBrBZBrrzsSB8i8 IML FINB FBK 174 DIV S3 FLANMIH6 AMO ZONING Page 16 I f IV f' <■' k'.'-l ■i' • tr4. i‘ . *is.y. . --'i V r i-.i'f!' I- Page 17 1991 1992 199? 1992 1989 1990 1991 Y-T-0 EST DEPT KCR COUMCIL ACTUAL ACTUAL APPtOP 5-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOMND ADOPTED REHARKS *«s*»«a»«»B*»»aa»**«»««»rsa«a»sssasstss = = = ss = = = ssar »=s = ss=: = = = = = 2 ***””" “^* 4S31 EOflPMENT 4 MAC RENTAL 40 500 500 500 TOTAL RENTALS 0 40 500 0 500 500 0 0 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaxaxaaxssxaxaaaaasaaasxzxxxxxxxxxxxxxsxxxxxxxxxrXX = 4340 miM? OmCE EQUIPMENT 2786 3050 2900 1080 2900 3000 4341 NAINT AUTO EOUIPNENT 879 1535 1300 1556 1600 1600 4342 NAINT RISC EOUIPMENT 269 341 270 304 400 470 MM TOIAl CONTRACT NAIN-REPAIR 3934 4926 4470 2940 4900 5070 0 0 rx88axaaaaaaaa«>aB«sa9xxxxxxsxsaeaasxxxasrxxzxxxsz5Xzsazxxxxxxxaxxrxxxsx 4332 l0Qli*AMIN SERVICE 2677 2752 2750 963 2890 3120 4333 COURIER-DATA PR0CES81N0 4 0 0 4334 lOBlt'CLASS 2 ASSESSMENT 1730 1729 1730 1220 4333 DATA PROGESSim 3884 4167 4200 1453 4360 4710 *##«TOTAL OATA PROCESSING 6563 6919 8680 4145 8980 9050 0 0 aaaaaaaaaBaaaaaaaaaxaaaaaaaaBaaaaaaaaaaaaaxxaaaaaaBaaaxxxxBxaxxxxaxxxxxx 4336 NUTINn-CONT-SCNOOtS 1932 1781 2590 1148 2590 2600 MM TOTAL OTNER CONTRACT SERVICES 1932 1781 2590 1148 2590 2600 0 0 BaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaxxaaBaaxaxxxsaaBXKxxxxxaxaaxxxxxxxx 4370 QENEiAl UAIIIITY INSURANCE 1027 1190 1220 1120 1220 4373 EOUIPNENT FLOATERS INSURANCE 295 302 320 110 110 4374 AOTONOTIVE INSURANCE 610 476 500 540 540 4377 IMMILU UAIIIITY INSURANCE 1485 1470 1520 1520 1520 4379 IMURANCE AQENT OF RECORD 129 129 150 160 160 ##•#TOTAL INSURANCES 3546 3567 3710 0 3450 3550 0 0 aaBaaaaaaaaaaBaaaaarEBSxaaaasxaxxsBaxaxaxxxaBaBxxxxsxBaxsxacxxxaxxxxxxxa 41M NENKRtNlPS 500 420 520 120 520 520 4311 TRAVfl-NI LEACE-PARKING 1181 1326 1400 612 1400 UOO 4312 MEET INC EXPENSES 448 282 250 117 250 300 43D LICENSES I TAXES 20 0 20 4193 SPEC EOUIP REPUCENENT 1259 1729 1550 416 1600 1650 #*•#TOTAL OTNER CHARGES 3388 3777 3720 126S 3770 3890 0 0 tOTAL ANOIMTt THIS OlVItlON I' ■■•■••■■■saaassssssssBSsssassssvsssxsssssssssssaaxssssBsssas^sKssssssssa 230461 247358 204630 117010 297110 307940 0 0 mmmmmmmu mmmmmumm B««sxsa. 'saaesssa aaaaaxra ssxsssss ssxs = cxs xssrxxxx I . ft owwii nm pm m oiv » pumim $m zomim Page 17 r- CITY OF OnMO 01 OEKML FUM> M06 175 OlV 34 EMERGENCY PREPMEONESS Page 18 1991 EST 1992 OEPl 1992 1992 MGR COUNCIL1909 1990 1991 Y-T-0 ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 5-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOMMD ADOPTED aaa»*a«««««*«»««e»«**»«*xa***a«sssa*a***sss**ar=ss*s*ss=5*»s = = s=ss*s = = “* = REMARKS szsssssssssasass K" 1:^ 4210 OFFICE MIPPLIES 102 67 400 200 2M) 4232 MUIPNEMT PARTS A ACCES 420 600 loa 500 600 •MM TOTAL SUPPLIES-NAIH-REPAIRS A02 67 1000 108 700 800 0 0 ^ : 4m t ENQIKERINO OtMtULTIM TOTAL PtmiSIOMAL SERVICE B«»*»*««*«*aa**««a**«a«»a*a»»*ss5»aaax3aaaasxz2;*=B»==s5a=ss=a===B===-==® 357 0 0 357 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BBavaasaaaaaaaaaassaaaaaaaaaaaaarsaaaaaaaaaaasaaaascszsssssssxassazaaxxsa lit 4320 TELEPHONE 941 841 1200 284 1000 1100 4321 POETAGE 70 50 50 ###«TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS 941 841 1270 284 1050 asssaaaaaas IIwNnM S A IT O UuItIIIfIIIIIIil oIIHuuIIIIIIIIII OII4122 PRINTlItt A PUNLISNINO 106 200 200 200 •M*TOTAL PRlNTINO-PUtLlSN-AO 0 106 200 0 200 200 0 0 Baaa*«aBamaaaaaaaaa**«aaa*a****5aa*»**sa*«***sxsas**Baasssass2aa»a==s*== f-i^ . 4324 UTILITIES 33 35 100 9 70 100 ■i TOTAL UTILITIES 33 35 100 9 70 100 0 0 4342 MINT mSC EOUIPMENT 416 1000 286 1000 1000 —•TOTAL CONTRACT MAIN-REPAIR 416 0 1000 286 1000 1000 0 0 43M NMCRSHIPS 45 100 100 100 4»f SIREN ASREEMHT-NTKA SCH 5000 0 TOTAL OTHER CHARGES :6i''A:5v al" - ;■ TOTAL MOMTS THIS OlVIttON 2S 45 100 0 5100 100 0 0 aaaaaaSBBSBBBBSBxsaxaassaaaassaaaaxszxssBXsszsseszzssssrsasszasssasasasa 2374 1094 3470 687 8120 3350 0 0 aaaassaa aaaeaaxa aaaaasse asxsaaaa assaaaas aaaasras ssssszas asszssas * r ' : 0 01 OEMRAl FUND PROG 175 OlV 34 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Page 18 u UUV ja. fc- r* i'v;. cm OF OMMO 01 GENCRAL FUND PROG 185 OlV 35 ANIMAL CONTROL Page 19 1991 1992 1992 1992 m. 1989 1990 1991 Y-T-0 EST DEPT NCR COUNCIL ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 5-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOMMD ADOPTED HIIIIItIIIInMa5xaaxasxaaaaxxaxaBsxxrxxrxaxxxssxs==x====»====3======== 4100 SALAAIES-KEGULAA EMPLOYEE 1422 5001 5790 2487 6590 8400 4120 SALARICS-TEMP EMPLOYEE 5471 2917 1370 930 1560 0 4141 PEtA-ClTY COMTAlBUTlOil 94 544 260 111 330 380 4142 MGA/MDCA-CITY CONTIiUTlON 226 425 470 204 490 640 41SS yORKNAM COMP IMSURANCE 120 140 150 136 140 190 »aa»TOTAL PERSONAL KRVICES 7333 9027 8040 3868 9110 9610 0 0 •x«*«axBBXXXXBBXXBxa = = xxxsxsxaaxaaBxa = s = Bsxxsxxxxx = r S2 xsxxxxrxrxsxsBxrxxx 4221 i aOTMlHO A PERSONAL EQUIP 15 81 100 100 130 4232 EQUIPMENT PARTS i ACCES 181 327 450 400 450 ••••TOTAL SUPPLICS-NAIN-REPAtR 196 408 550 0 500 580 0 0 BaBBBaaaBXXxxBXxxxBxaxxxaxBBXxBXBXBBBxxBXBSxxsxxxaxrxxssBSsaxzsxxsxxxxxx 4321 POSTAGE 900 MM TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS 0 0 0 0 0 900 0 0 SSBaBBXXBXB3XXXXXaaaX8XXXXXXaBaXXX8BBXXXXBXXBBXXXXXXSXXXXBB3XXX3XBXXXXXS 4322 PRINTING 8 PUiLISNING 91 173 46 100 130 MM TOTAL PRINTING- niSLISH-AO 91 173 0 46 100 130 0 0 ■9BaaaaBXXBBBBBa3BS88XXXXXXXZaxXXX33X8XXXSXXXSX8XXX3XXBXSXSSXSXX3XXX383X 4341 NAINT AUTO EQUIPMENT 1049 1000 525 1000 1100 MM TOTAL OONTRACT MAIN-REPAIR 0 1049 1000 525 1000 1100 0 0 ■a«B8aSBBBSaXXaaBa«aXSXXXSXXXrXBB3388ZXXSB8SXS8SXax3BXXS338CX33SX3XXXSZ3 4KG MEETIN6S-CONF >SCHOOLS 60 4340 ANIMAL CARE 809 1125 1500 331 1350 1500 MM TOTAL OTHER CONTRACT SERVICE 809 1185 1500 331 1350 1500 0 0 saaaaaaaaaxxeaBaaBBXBaxxcxaaBxxxxaaaxrxxBBXxxxxxxaasxxxsxxaxcsxxxxssxxxs 4374 AUTOMOTIVE INSURANCE 507 350 350 350 MM TOTAL INSURANCES 0 507 350 350 0 350 0 0 REMARKS TOTAL ANQUifi INIS DlVItlON ••sarssasaBaaBKassBaBSSSxssKKKxsrsssassaxxacsasssssssssssxsssxxrxBssssssss 8429 12349 11440 5120 12060 14170 0 0 saaaaaaa aaBxsxxB xxxxaxas bxxxxxxx xxxxxaxe xcxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxsxxxxx 1^ 01 OBBRAL nao NOG 185 OlV 35 ANIMAL CONTROL Page 19 ?.'■fc.'-*. j ■CITY QY OMMO01 OCKIAL TUNO PtOG 200 DIV G1 ENGINEERING Page 20I}'■ ?;:■ '' k; 1989ACTUAL 1990ACTUAL 1991APPROP 1991Y-T-D EST 5-31-91 ACTUAL 1992 1992 1992DEPT MGR COUNCIL REQUEST RECOMN) ADOPTED 4104 ENGIKERINO RETAINER 4S0S ENQINCERIN6 CONSULTING REMARKS ««»«««m»»««»»»*«o«»«3s»=»s»»«*s«a«a«sss«s=ss»==a*sassss==e3sasz=ssa33=s3=r==ss3====*==s*»=s**”***’* 76U 950 1100 ISO 1000 1100 2230 2846 3850 3700 3850 Page 20 CBUDGT cm or OMWO Page 21 *100 4111 4120 4141 4142 4151 4152 4155 i-4210 422014221 r 4252 4255 4240 MLMIES-REGUIM ENPIOYEE OVERTIME-REOULAR ENTLOYEE SALMIES-TEMP EMPLOYEES PERA‘C1TV CONTRIOUTION PICA/IOGIt-CITT COMTRIIUTION NOIPITM.IZATICM INSURANCE LIFE INIURANCE MORKMAIIS COMP INSURANCE ***• TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICE OFFICE SUPPLIES MOTOR FUELS 4 LURRICANTS aOTNING 4 PERSONAL EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT PARTS 4 ACCES STREET HAINT NAT 4 SUPPLY ROOKS 4 PERIODICALS TOTAL SUPPLIES'NAIN-REPAIR LE8AL-OOHSULTIN6 SERVICES EmiNEERlin CONSULTING OTHER CONSULTING SERVICES TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4503 4505 4504 •M* CONST 4 HAINT 1991 1992 1992 1992 1989 1990 1991 T-T-D EST DEPT HGR COUNCIL ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 5-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOHMO ADOPTED aBBaaaaaaaBaassssxsssasassBaaxaasasssaaBsssssararsrsssassasssscrsass====== 136249 U7437 137860 69067 138380 143490 8390 1481S 8000 5002 8000 8000 213 5800 120 5800 5800 6319 7260 6540 3329 6800 7050 10983 12654 11240 6H5 11640 12030 13172 14830 18110 7881 18100 15860 139 ISO 190 90 210 210 14100 16190 16610 14613 14620 19130 191352 213549 206550 106837 203550 214570 0 0 742 1015 600 189 600 800 12384 11716 15000 6635 15000 15000 2635 3076 2700 1051 2700 2700 13881 11025 9000 3717 9000 10000 189246 142712 154200 7051 154200 160000 32 30 0 218888 169544 181500 16675 181530 188500 0 0 510 411 500 24 500 500 10202 8376 10000 1393 5000 10000 REMARKS PAGE 21 = ssss 10900 9576 10500 1417 5500 10500 •••■sassssaxssBSssss&BSSSBSsasscasssKasaBzsssssssssasssssssssssxasssBsxsss 4310 TELIPIIQIIE 972 1398 1000 513 1200 1200 4331 POIfAfiE 136 169 300 95 200 200 MM fOTAL CCMNUNICATIONS 1108 1567 1300 608 1400 1400 0 0 ssBSSBBSBBSsssssBBSssssBSSBsacssrnssssssssssscssasassxsssssssxcaBSsssBss 3004333PRINTIH8 4 PURIISNINC 217 391 300 85 300 4333 ADVERTISING 128 87 108 no MM TOIAl PtlNTIN6-PU8LltNIK-AD 345 478 300 193 410 300 0 0 ■■••••MBBBSSBBMSSBSSBSSSsaBaBBsaxasacszxaxsssxBZBssssssssxsxssBBssaBBas FUa PROO 249 DIV 42 STREET OOMT 4 NAINT PACE 21 it-f ■ r.;^' 1991 1992 1992 1992 1989 1990 1991 ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP Y-T-D 5-31-91 EST ACTUAL DEPT REQUEST MGR RECOMMD COUNCIL ADOPTED 4324 UTtUTIES«3039 3258 3500 728 9 A 9 ^ mm ^ ^ M 1 3500 3S00 432S STREET L16NTIHC •12025 12762 15000 3310 15000 15000 •••*TOTAL UTILITIES 15064 16020 18500 4038 18500 18500 0 0 4331 EQUIPMENT 4 MAC RENTAL lim 4998 15100 180 15000 15000 -**TOTAL RENTALS 12090 4998 S 9 9 M9 9 15100 180 15000 15000 0 0 4340 NAINT OFMCE EQUIPMENT H WHHM W 330 404 aasazsasas 250 131 250 250 4341 NAINT AUTO EQUIPMENT 3513 3035 4000 1049 4000 4000 4342 NAINT NISC EQUIPMENT 3899 4770 9500 5409 9500 9500 TOTAL CONTRACT NAIN*REPAIR 7750 8209 13250 6589 13750 13750 0 0 REHARICS PAGE 22 sasssMBavKBassassa8assass3SX3S«9ScsxBaK3SS3S£z = 3 = s33sr a:ssss = = ssrrr^sre 4356 NUT INQS-CONF - SCHOOLS 14 372 500 75 500 500 TOTAL OTHER CONTRACT SERVICE 14 372 500 75 500 500 0 0 43ni OtIBAL LIAilLITT INSURANCE uio 8546 8600 sasssssasasaasaaaassszssasrs3sssss=z===s=sxss 8700 8800 4373 EQUIPMENT PLOATERS INSURANCE 1004 1172 1130 1240 1300 4374 MITONOnVE INSURANCE 2135 1782 2020 501 2550 2550 4377 UNBKLU LIAOILITT INSURANCE 10311 10260 10600 10410 10410 4S7f INSURANC8 AGENT 07 RECORD 142 154 200 210 210 TOTAL INSURANCES 21622 21914 22750 501 23110 23270 0 0 4SM NMERSNIPS 10 50 50 so 50 50 4381 TUVIL-NILEAGE-PAIUCING 51 872 50 9.0 2800 3000 4383 LICENSES 4 TAXES 2562 700 350 17 550 350 4SW CONTRACT TREE RENOVAL 242 2000 2000 2000 4391 TREE DISPOSAL CHARGES 175 1500 1500 1500 4393 SPEC EOUIPNEHT KPLACENENT 49 74 70 20 70 70 B#B«TOTAL OTHER CHARGES 2672 2113 4020 997 6770 6970 0 0 TOSAl ANOUNTS THIS DIVISION 482605 448340 aaaaaaasaas?-ssaazasaaaaaaaaszasasBaaaassasssacssaaaaa 474770 140110 470020 493260 0 0 BBaaaaaa BaaaBaaa BaaaaBaa asssssas xa8eaz35 sszzscrz ax33s3SS xzssaaaa •1 BJBMi naD M08 2M DIV 42 STKET CONST t NAINT PAGE 22 fe-: ; H CITY OF ORONO 01 GENERAL FUND PROG 290 DIV 61 PARKS A RECREATION Page 23 4154 *«*• 4505 4104 4M1 **4KI f-4622 4252 hr 1991 1992 1992 1992 1989 1990 1991 T-T-0 EST DEPT NCR COUNCIL ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 5'31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOMMD ADOPTED s=assss*s»srsr = z = ssrrrsr = = r= = srsr = = :;2 = = sr = rrsrrrrrrr = = = = = = = 2 = = r = = = = = = r2sr 2 = REMARKS r222322S2SSS=223 4100 SALARIES-REGULAR EMPLOYEE 18299 27927 20360 10354 20440 21150 4111 OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEE 27 38 73 60 50 4120 SALARIES-TEMP EMPLOYEES 2968 10770 390 107/0 10770 4141 PERA-CITY CONTRIBUTION 799 1253 910 467 920 950 4142 FtCA/fBCR-CITY CONTRIBUTION 1377 2107 1720 7 2390 2450 4155 UORKMANS COMP INSURANCE 345 420 410 410 UMCHPiOYNIIIT CQNPtNSATIOM TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 20929 34293 34180 11291 35010 35780 8SBB«SSXX«SaBS92S3«22SS»S33SS22S222222232222X2222222222=22222=2222822=22 4220 MOTOR FUELS B LUBRICANTS 159 242 500 500 500 4251 BLOG A GROUNDS MAR SUPPL'415 1066 2500 122 2500 2500 4252 EQUIPMENT PARTS A ACCES 510 844 800 40 800 800 #*#•TOTAL SUPPLIES-MAIN-REPAIR 1084 2152 3800 162 3800 3800 0 0 ENGINEERING CONSULTING OTHER CONSULTING TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICE POSTAGE TOTAL OONMUNiCATIONS PRINTING 4 PURLISHING ROVERTISING TOTAL PRINTING-PUBLISHING-AO ■■BSXaSe3SS8TR2SSXSS2S229S=2S222322232223222X222223=2222=2822222222222=22 45 217 45 1006 0 0 0 0 0 0 ■XaS8*SS«SX38SXSS3S=2SSS22SS22SS228SX22SS2323 22222222222SS2232X22S222322 6 38 39 40 40 6 36 0 39 40 <i0 0 0 S*S3«SSSSSSS82222B28288233aS22282222222282222222222283822822832828222222 6 41 90 90 50 6 41 0 120 120 80 0 0 8SB8888S8S88X8SCXSSS88S8S3SB8SSS8=SSS82aSSS38288282882283822882328222822 4524 UTILITIES 243 308 250 49 250 250 •—TOTAL UTILITIES 243 308 250 49 250 ooo4551 EQUIPMENT A MAC RENTAL 1514 1707 3000 246 3000 3000 ****TOTAL RENTALS 1514 1707 3000 246 3000 3000 0 0 8a«BaSBSaB8BB888SSB8a8SSSSa8SS22=28S=28S22==2e2X2222=2288SS28S=2====r2S2 OML FUMD Mt06 290 DIV 61 PARKS A RECREATION Page 23 K- ■■ ■ --"fr Page 241991199219921992190919901991Y-T-D EST DEPT MGR COUNCILACTUALACTUALARPROR5-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOHMD ADOPTED■aaaaxaaraaaaaaaaaaaaaaazBaaaazraaaarrarrazaaaaaraaaaaszraaaaarrrassa;4940 MINT OFFICE EQUIPMEMT 2 21 3 0 04941NAm? AUTO EOUIPMENt 1055 152 500 500 500 4942 MINT NISC EOUIMENT 123 233 500 500 500 4949 MINT tlOCS 4 GROUNDS 1592 1551 3900 606 3900 3900 MM TOTAL CONTRACT MIN-REPAIR 2772 1957 4900 609 4900 4900 0 0 aaaaazaaaaaaaaaaaaazaaaraaaaaaaaazaa 4»7 JOINT RECREATION PROORAII 1503 1682 2000 2000 2000 MM TOTAL OTHER CONTRACT SERVICE 1503 1682 2000 0 2000 2000 0 0 BsaBBBBaBBS«««9S«sscaass«a9s«as3xrx3zs2sssss = ====ss32 = 3s:ssssssss sss = = ss 4970 OENENAL LIAilLlTT INSURANCE 2674 2925 3020 3010 3020 4S71 g PtOPERTY INSURAIICE 168 U3 160 150 160 4979 EOUIPMENT FLOATERS INSURANCE 110 116 120 240 240 4974 MITONOTINE INIURANCf 305 235 260 270 2^0 U77 UNMEIU LIMILITY INSURANCE 1485 1470 1520 1520 1520 497V IVSUrJUiCE AGENT OF RECORD 93 26 30 30 30 MM TOTAi INSURANCES 4775 4915 5110 0 5220 5240 0 0 ««S9««Bsa««aa«»5sxKssNiKRisaxsssssssssrsassc3Sssss3szazzKzxssssssxsrssssss 4911 TRANtLHIILEASE -RARKING 75 50 30 49tS LICENSES 4 TAXES 17 20 20 4919 SREC EGUIR RERUC0NENT 15 MM TOTAL OTNEI CHARGES 75 15 50 17 20 50 0 0 ntMl MmilTf Tits DIVItlON 32952 48114 53290 12533 54360 55140 0 0 mmmmmmMM BSsaaaaa aaaaaaaaI aaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa REMARKS iAl RMD 290 DIV 61 PARICS I RECREATIOM ^ ■ Page 24 r: ■; CITY Of ORONO Page 25 V ' ‘‘i'' ’ 01 6EMEML FUND PROG 29S DIV 65 RECYCLING PICKUP PROGRAM 1989 1990 1991 f 4100 SALMIES-REGULAR EMPLOYEE i. 4210 4232 •••• 4303 1991 1992 1992 1992 Y-I-O ESI DEPT MGR COUNCIL ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 5-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOMMO ADOPTED 2SSSSSSsamsssss3ss=saBSS£ssxEzss=aassrrsssssss=s======s=£=3=s=====:===== 2903 227 REMARKS -r-zrr=trr=s===-===3a 4111 OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEE 2230 1000 1000 4141 PERA-CITY CONTRIBUTION 114 10 100 50 50 4142 flCA/HKX-CITY CONTRIBUTION 201 17 170 80 80 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 3218 254 2500 0 1130 1150 Office SUPPLIES EOUIPMEMT PARTS I ACCES TOTAL SUPPLIES-MAIN-REPAIR LEGAL-CONSULTIMG SERVICES 90 16744 0 0 aass3«ss333s9s38ssssssss=sas=za=a=razas5sssssss£=5sssss:ss 28 100 148 150 100 930 16834 958 100 148 150 100 0 0 CaaSBaa*33«3a8aa33SSZSSS33BZ33333XSS333SS333SSSS3SSS3S = = 33 = 3S = 3SS 333 3 = 3 = 74 4306 OTHER CONSULTING SERVICES 2134 2500 694 2500 2500 TOTAL PROfESSIONAL SERVICE 74 2134 2500 694 2500 2500 0 0 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaeaaaaaaasaBsaazarsssxssrssssssssssssssssssssasaas 4321 POSTAGE 78r 469 500 1828 1830 500 TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS 787 469 500 1828 1830 500 0 0 4322 PRINTING 8 PUBLISNING 12 253 197 200 200 MM TOTAL PRINTING-PUBLISNING-AD 12 253 0 197 200 200 0 0 BaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaBaB3BKacsaa383css83ss9s=Bs=sssB=ss3Z3=3333ssKS33as 4340 MAIN? OfflOE EOUIPMENT 46 42 21 4348 SPtlMG-fALL-XNAS CLEAN UP 12060 23064 20000 20000 20000 MM TOTAL CONTRACT MAIN-REPAIR 12106 23106 20000 21 20000 20000 0 0 aaaaaaB8B8a88BBXaBBBBBBBBBBBaBSSSaSSSSSSSSSZ=3=S=SZ3S3BZ=SS333=SS3a=S8S8 4BS DATA PROCESSING 92 95 100 120 120 130 TOTAL DATA PROCESSING 92 95 100 120 120 ISO 0 0 43M NEfTINOS-COOF-SCHOOlS aaaaaBaasaxaaaB8a8aBaas8aBsas8sssszs3ZB3aszzs3S33ss3S3S3S38s8=38S8ssBsss 6 MM TOTAL OTHER CONTRACT URVICC 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 4481 THAVEL-MILEAGE-PARICIliG 9 29 30 30 4392 CONTRACT RECYCLING PICKUP 17787 27350 42600 13560 42600 42600 4193 SPEC EOUIP REPLACENENT 72 44 90 121 130 130 MM TOYAL OTNER CHARGES 17859 27403 42690 13710 42760 42760 0 0 YtrUi AMUiTt Tilt DIVISION asaaaaaBasaBaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaBBBBaaaasBaaaaasasaBBasaaaassxBsass $0902 $4678 68390 16718 68690 67320 0 BB Bl nOiO*’ IIMf Page 25 ^ . — • ...7 :, / • 'VHH\■■ 'CITT OP OMNC Page 2601 OEKRAl FUND PROG MO DtV 71 SPECIES-CONSULTING A POLICE 1989 1990 1991 r-T-D 1991 EST 1992 DEPT 1992 MGR 1992 COUNCIL ACfUAL ACTUAL APPROP S-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOM) ADOPTED pf :<arks «flS««a»«aB««S«aa9sa«ss«9ssr««sat3ssxaszssss=sssrrsszs5sassss:sssssssssssssss::szssssssss = = sss = s = = = r s = 4111 OVERTINE-tCOMlS EMPLOYEE 10783 6729 5090 1083 5090 8040 4U1 PENA-CITT OONTSltUTlON 1295 870 610 121 610 960 POLICE SPEC SERVICE MM TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 120M 7599 5700 1204 5700 9000 0 0 assaaaasaBaBaaxaaxBK sasxBsaasBxasxssssssr3ssr3SS3Xzssxa3S33sa = = zs‘sss = = sz 4303 LE6AL*OONSULT1NQ KRVICES 24361 21600 12200 2929 12000 12000 COSTS PAID BT DEVELOPERS THRU PERMITS 4303 ENQINESRINQ CONSULTING 14700 13166 11S50 4558 13000 13000 AND FEES BILLED. 4300 OTNER CONSULTINQ SERVICES 104 2500 2000 2000 MM TOTAL PtOTESSIONAL SERVICES 39061 34950 26550 7487 27000 27000 0 0 Baaazzsssssaazzsssr 3scz£ = aeassssa = sss:s: = z = s 4399 CTNER CHARGES 3170 0 0 TOTAL OTNER CHARGES 0 3170 0 0 0 0 0 0 rsasaac -szssssaasrassrsssszsazzsssrs raiAL MOUNTS TNIt DIVISION S1U1 45719 32250 8691 32700 36000 0 0 esssaaar assssass SSSS5SSS azssssrs \r'- i-: i1 HMML FUND PROS MO OlV 71 SPECIES-CONSULTING & POLICE Page 26 -...A. ti y- cm or otoNo 12 PtM FUND DIV 00 Page 28 1989 ACTUAL 1991 1992 1992 1992 1990 1991 T-T-D tST DEPT MCA COUNCIL ACTUAL APPROP 5-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOMMD ADOPTED P f § I;' 4S0S •*** 45S0 4SSS REMARKS l■■astts«8s■8CssacaBr33XSsss5SSSsss83zssssx8S3==sss«3SS6SSSSS8S3=s===ss^ss3S7srss: = ss: = = ^s = :-:sS3 = r = r: = a Ir ■* EMINeERIIKS CONSULTING TOTAL PIOPESSIONAL SERVICES OTHER IMPROVEMENTS special asmhts on land I TOTAL CAFITAI OUTUT TOTAL MOUNTS THIS DIVISION TOTAL ANOUNTS THIS FUND (19t> i 084) - "r:: l-V^. ' yc ■ Clt»> mI'<]R7) r:,.. NAW FUND MOJfCTt mm DARK- DilNKlNG FOUNTAIN NAVAANE NLAYGAOUND/PAAK STtffT LIGHTS FfNCINQ LTOIARD KACN GATS SIGNS GASOO raiNT KAD SIGNS W (iio) (9f»> SAMPT OEACN SIORt IIT PARK KACN Sion m- I% 12 PARK FUND OlV (» 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l««BC8«BSS8aa83SV«8aSXSKXS8SSS8K9rSBSSSSSSS333SZSS8SCSS33SSSSS=SZSSasasS 790 11100 6100 6G0 0 1470 illOO 0 0 6100 0 0 raaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaaaanxsassasasssssssBscsssssTisaBaBassasasass 0 1470 11100 0 0 6100 0 0 aaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa aaasaazs aaasasas 0 1470 11100 0 0 6100 0 0 aaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa aaauazaa aaaaaaaa 5000 5000 660 790 5000 500 500 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 U70 11100 6100 Page 28 *•/ ....... BUDGOUTL & F.-.i 'S' it,.* k‘ . ■ ¥ ■S’fe ■ p ■ ilf.m CITY Of OKMO U INPCOYEKNT & EOUinCNT OUTLAY FUND DtV 00 PAGE 29 1909 1990 1991 Y-T-D 1991 EST 1992 DEPT 1992 MCA 1992 COUNCIL i^t r‘ .t-’i >K fi::, AS30 ASM 4SS0 ASM OTHER IMPROVENEHTS OFFICE FURN-FIKT-EQUIP AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT OTIKR EQUIPMENT TOTAL CAPTIAL OUTUT TOTAL AMOUNTS THIS DIVISION TOTAL AMOUNTS TNIS FUND ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 5-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOMHO ADOPTED REMARKS Bsas«sss««3ssi««s««ssssss3szs=sa3ssssssxssss8SSsa9S3SSBSSs = srssssxsssss8Ssszs= = ss = rssssss=ss«sssaaaBssi 1S8A0 17650 16101 U053 700 402 700 3150 4A078 9191 ABOO A0OO 50700 13147 93138 55050 23742 55850 51000 74206 132222 61350 24144 61350 122500 0 0 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaszsassaaaaaaaasaassssrsssasaazzssscassaaasssaa 7A206 132222 61350 24144 61350 122500 ■aaaasasssaMiaaaaaaasaaBaaasssaxsazasazxxazzzszzaaaasassssaassssaasssaas 74206 132222 61350 24144 61350 122500 aaaaaxxx ■■axxxxs aaaaxasx xxzassss ssssssss ssxxazxr c=sa::=s xsssszss H530 (6S7) eittftGEIiCT PREP-SmEN/CRYSTAL BAY 17650 i4S40 (632) B42 - RECORDER DIOITAI PAGER (629> flNAIICE • YERMIRAL PRINYER CHAIR CALCUUTQR 250 150 1500 600 250 200 3150 •4550 (6S4) .PARRS - TUILER (633) STREETS -DUMP TRUCK HOillE RADIO 5000 45000 700 50700 saaaaaaaa •4560 (634) PARKS - POUER BROQN(TORO) MEED MNIP (633) STREETS • CURS NACHIHE AIR OONPRESSOR (TRAIIER MOUNT) CUT OPP SAU (Q6S) MEED WHIP UTILITY MOUER 5000 500 17000 4500 2500 500 21000 51000 X3X3XXXXX 14 liVNOVBCHT 4 ENUIPMENT OUTUT FUND DIV 00 PAGE 29 r 'v .I'CITY or OKMO IS IUIWIII6 CAPITAL OUTUT FUND OIV 00 Paye 30 1 4303 4305 S’4306 •*** 4999 f ■ (- I'f r«1 4510 f : ^ *4511 r- i .4520 MM '. V * “4710 LEGAL-CONSULTING ENGINEERING CONAA.TING OTNER CONSULTING SERVICES TOTAL PROFEStlONAL SERVICE OTNER CHARGES TOTAL OTNER CHARGES LAND INPROVENENTt TO LAND ■UILDINGS A STRUCTURES TOTAL CAPITAL OUTUY OPERATING TRANSFER OUT TOTAL TRANSFERS TOTAL ANOUNTS THIS FUND •V . ■?>-;' W •(ir*-- m'fin [S I' i||; IS iUllilHO CAPITAL OUTUT FUND OIV 00 1991 1992 1992 1992 1989 1990 1991 T-T-0 EST DEPT NCR COUNCIL ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 5-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECONMD «)OPTED ••■■•••••o»s««ss»**a«asasssraBaaa»s*as»oss2ss=ssrrrsarsss=rsr===s2==sr2= 53A 50 100 5064 11253 34465 3000 20000 11253 40063 0 3050 20100 0 0 0 ***s**s>Ba>**BSsaaB8aa38sssasz8Bssaaa««BBsssa3SsssssBsss2s3SB23as2sssass 502 1951 502 1951 0 0 0 0 0 0 ■•••■■•■•*»**s»****a3saBa3aaacBaBaasaBasaBBsra3aaa23raar3rs3srr arrasaarr 292200 0 5000 0 0 0 5000 292200 0 0 0 •■•■••••■■■•■»*»a***»*a3BBBB*BBB3BBBBaaBBBraBaraaa3aa33araaaar aaaaeassaa 0 102690 25673 102690 105B0O 0 0 102690 25673 102690 105800 0 0 ■•■■••■■•••■■■■■••■■■•aaaaBBaBBBaBBaaBaaBBBaaaaaaaaaaraaaaaaaaeaaararr2a 11755 42014 102690 33723 414990 105800 0 0 ■■•■■■*• •■aaBBBB 88338333 88888888 83388333 33882883 33388388 88223838 REMARKS 2222232222232283 t’ V. \ Page 30 Li- s . 1tJDGSTAI CITY Of OMM) 23 NUMIC STATf AlO CONS FUND OlV 00 Page 31 4305 EMQIKEMIN6 COMSULTING 4306 OTHER CONSULTINC SERVICES TOTAl PAOFEtSIOilAL SERVICE 4530 OTHER INPROVEMEHTS TOTAl CAPITAL OUTLAY 4710 OPERA^’VG TRARSFE:! OUT TOTAL TkANSFERS•*** TOTAl AMOUNTS THIS FUND 1991 1992 1992 1992 1989 1990 1991 T-T-D EST DEPT MGR COUNCIL ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 5-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOMMD ADOPTED REMARKS «a^«»ai*»sar2«i!sa*=aa=s***r = 3S*es»«B ===ae***a=assae=ars»*==es«a»s = = ssss*sr rs==s*esssass = sasES£S2Ssas 1830 3865 0 5695 0 0 0 0 0 0 sssasassBSBSssBBSsssssasssszssssassszzrsssxsrsssssrsssssssssssssssrzrssr 0 0 560000 1560000 0 0 560000 0 0 1560000 0 0 ■BBaaaa«aB8SSSBzs3assesssBBBasssBsss = z = = 3Sss = = srBsaszsBSBSssa sssssssrzsr 190000 10000 190000 000 10000 000 aaaaaaaaaaaB88BazBaBaBB8aaB3S8aBaaaaaaas3a8aa = aaaa38saa = aa = aas azaaaar33 = 190000 5695 560000 0 10000 1560000 0 0 aaaaaaaa sBassaaa aBBBBaaa BEsazsas saasssaa aaBaassa saasasss aaaaaaaa mmi STATE AID mOJECTS 1'<355>OLD CRYSTAL SAT RO. SRIOGE 3951 560000 560000 ](396)T.N. 12 FRONTAGE ROM 1744 2000 2000 7*-' ,(357)COUNTY RD. 15-NAVARRE 190000 10000 10000 >■- L 'PWDS ASAILASIE fSON THE STATE Of MINNESOTA 1-1-91 857333 BszBBaaar (354) NCOULLV ROM C***> aiaUN ROM NO. OR WILLOU ORIVE NO. 40000 1000000 O NUilC STATE AID t TO OlV 00 Page 31 r-rf. .w-; I Iv CITT or OMMO E-t A 2* KM INKOV RfVOLVING FUND OlV 00 Page 32 k 1991 1992 1992 I. i:' V fe;'I f.Pfe* 1F-- 1989 1990 1991 r-T-D EST DEPT COUNCIL ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 5-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST ADOPTED •1)IfIIIIuIIIIIIIIIInMIIII11IIIIIIIIIIII<1<14100 IALA|IEf-ftECULAft INPIOYEE 47 1691 1 lOTAL fEESOML SEtVlCES 47 1691 0 0 0 0 0 • 4210 OEFICE iUmiES 13 TOTAL fUPfLIES-ilAlN*KEPAIII 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 laaaasasaaaasa888888888SS8SBrS8SSS878S3ssssas 4303 IE6M.-00NSUITIN6 SERVICES 613 121S 123 4303 EN0INEERIN6 OONSUIIINC 7012 4100 4306 OTHER OOHSULTIHG URVICES 177 411 45 50000 #**•TOTAi fROKSSIOHAL SERVICES 7802 5729 0 168 0 50000 0 4321 raSTAGE 36 159 9 **#«TOTAL OOMUNICATIONS 36 169 0 9 0 0 0 ■scs«a«asfliaBSiaaBSBaasszassssssss9Bans9tsaBzsssss = s = rrsss«scKS3s = a 4322 KIHTINO t VUOLISNINO 249 142 4323 ADVERTISINO 126 MM TOTAL KIHTINO 4 9USLISHING 249 142 0 126 0 0 0 aasBsaaBaaBaaaaasassBsssssssssaBssasssssassssssszszarsassaasssa 4340 HUNT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 16 ««M TOTAL CONTRACT MAIN-REPAIR 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 s ^aaa *«aaaaBaaaaaaaaBaa8a8aaaaaaaBaaaaa8aBaarasa3azsaaBaaaaa833 43B LICENSES 4 TAXES 10 4303 SKC EQUIP MPUCEKNT 30 4)99 OTNU CNAROiS 11464 10662 3233 5000 0 4710 TRANSFER TO GEN FUND 20077 17680 17680 17650 ■ V1 STREET LIGHTING PROJ 4332 STREET CONSTRUCTION MM TOTAL OTHER CHARGES 11464 30787 17680 3233 22680 17650 0 aaaaaaaafl 88aSBZS8SasS888888883988889 lOtM. MOUNTS TNIt FUND 19598 38547 17680 3536 22660 67650 0 : 889888888X888888 SS88SSSS REMARKS IHMOV KV01VIN8 FUND OlV 00 Page 32 f V'1iPage 33 19S9 actual 1990 ACTUAL 1991 APPWP Y-T-0 5-31-91 1991 EST ACTUAL 1992 1992 DEPT COUNCIL REQUEST ADOPTED sc«9aBssaa««a838S3sss9S3=s=SESS539ex=a3«=3sszs = ss = rass3xzss = s= = = = r = = = s = r = REMARKS r3=33===3ssssssrs fll MOJCCTS {408) STUMS OAY SEWER C417) (410) (441 > C422) WOdMILl AVE ST IPV NI6W0QP STORM SEWER HAZARDOUS SLD6S OTHER STREET LIGHTS CR 15 5679 788 365 11166 529 6515 2000 10662 3233 5000 20077 17680 17650 II¥'iII-'- cm OF ORONO 42 I966-74 IMF lOND 0/S FUND OIV 00 Page 34 j" 41J9 5^;.' IL b- 4104 4322 «•** 40NINSTUTIVE SfRVICE fOTAL FCRSCML ICRVICES SFCC A«WT FORECAST TOTAL FROFESSIONAL SERVICES PRIHTIHS 4 FURLISRIRQ TOTAL FRIRTIR6 4 FUOLISNINC 1991 1992 1992 1992 1909 1990 1991 Y-T-0 EST DEPT MCA COUNCIL ACTUAL ACTUAL APPNOP 5-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOMMD ADOPTED RENARKS ■•■m«sssc;«rsassssss5r8ssa3axsaafltxssss9sxsssa=sss£srz3sss = sz = s=ssssss = :sss?ssss-=8zs3rsssssssssssssss TOO 800 230 58 120 0 700 800 230 58 120 0 0 0 ■saaaaseaasBsassssssr^ssBsasBKsssssssasaaazszs2sssss8S«sxrssss=ssxrsssss 00000000 ■aaaassasaaass^rsaaxssssBaaaaBxssaxrszsaavsssssssssssssszsssassssxsssass 5 54000000 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaazBaasasasxsasasszsrssszsssesssxzsxszzzssssss Page 34 )IMPBON iIr W^: K-y tf CITY Of OiOHO 43 19M IMP mm D/s FUM) OIV 00 Page 35 1991 y-T-O EST 1792 1992 1992 DEPT MGR COUNCIL1989 1990 1991 ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 5-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOMMO ADOPTED REMARKS rcs:aassrsasaass=B=2a2a55 = = s = scs32 = ss sr 3saat = = rj:s2S2 = s»s2==ssa = = ss2 = = = sa2r zs 2srzr s2 = sss = ss2 ^rsv; P" I' j-V' 4139 AOmNISTRATlVE SERVICES 370 440 680 170 660 560 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 370 440 680 170 680 560 0 0 asaaaeaazzaaaeaazasaasaaaaz 333333333 33333333233333233333333333 4306 SPEC ASMNT FORECAST TOTAL PtOFEUIONAL SERVICES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 aaaaaa8aaaaaaazsss=a83aa3aasaaaaaaaaasaaa23aaaaa2azaaaaaaaa=2aaaa=2rarra 4322 PRINTING A PUillSNlNG 3 2 0 0 •••*TOTAL PRINTING A PUBLISHING 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 asaacaasasBsaasssssaaasaaasssBsasaaaaaassasaaz 33353SSS333333323333333SSS 4410 BOND PRINCIPAL 75000 75000 75000 75000 75000 75000 4620 BOND INTEREST 46275 40425 34460 18731 54460 28460 4630 ROND PAYING AGENT 241 400 40C 200 400 400 TOTAL DEBT ^>ERVICE 121516 115825 109860 93931 109860 103860 0 0 ■aaaaaaaaaaaaasszsa138383883333833883383333333333338333383333383333333233 TOTAL ANOUNTS TNtS FUND 121889 116267 110540 94101 110540 104420 0 0 33338333 8BXSSSSS S33SS3 33 33333333 33233333 3333=333 FUTURE DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS ( TAX LEVY THU RMO ACCOUNTS FOR THE 6.0. IMPROVEMENT BONOS, DATED 12-1-80, FINAL MATURITT 3-1-96 MIHClPAL lAUUKE OUTSTANDING 12-31-92 S300.000 HCT INTEREST RATE ON BONDS IS 8.23X; INTEREST RATE ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS IS 9.5X. PATABIE PRINARILT FROM TNE COLLECTION OF SPECIAL ASSEMENTS LEVIED ANAIRST BENEFITTED PROPERTIES. TNERE IS A TAX LEW, WHICN CAN BE LEVIED OR CANCiUED OH ANN ANNUAL BASIS. INDICATED WITN THE DEBT REQUIREMENTS SCHEDULE. BONO BOND TAX YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST LEVY 3 33 3 333353SS S38S3SS 88SSSS 1993 75000 ?2386 16100 1994 75000 16163 15300 1995 75000 9788 14400 1996 75000 3281 0 TOTAL 300000 51620 45800 CAIN AND INVESTMENTS BALANCE AT 12-31-990 S481,780 asaaasaa AS IBtO IMP BOND D/S FUND DIV 00 Page 35 Im Page 36 CITY Of OMMO U 1M2 IIP Mlil D/S FUND DIV 00 OUCCT DCSCRIfTION 1989 1990 1991 Y-T-D «cig»i KIWI. A».». _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ ___ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 1991 EST ACTUAL 1992 OEPT REQUEST 1992 MGR RECOMMD 1992 COUNCIL ADOPTED BMm«ssssxrssaasBS3scs3s = sz=x = srss?=3 = : 230 230 190 F' I •••• 4SW MHMINIVMini IVC KN TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES SPEC ASNNT FORCAST 220 260 230 58 230 190 0 0 ###*TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 4322 PRINTINO 4 PURLISN MM TOTAL PRINTINO A FUILISN U10 80ND PRINCIPAL SO.OOO 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 20,000 4020 BOND INTEREST 17,938 14,988 12,930 6,988 12,930 11 000 4430 ROND PAYING AGENT 180 160 220 10 220 220 MM TOTAL DENT SERVICE 68,118 40.148 38,150 32,098 38,150 31,220 mo REFUNDS • -I. TOTAL OTNCR DISIURSCMENTS YOTM. MOINITS TNIS FUND 68.338 *0.408 38,380 iBasBBa&aaK3ssxK3=3sssaxasssxas3S3S 32,156 38,380 31,410 Ir I JNRMllT, INDICATfO tflTN THE DCIT REOUIREMENTS SCHEDULE. --3-22rSSSS3r3aSS33S333S3333332SSXSSSr=SS33333333X3333=3=3333 FUTURE DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS S TAX LEVY PtlNClML IMJWCf OUTSTAMDINO 12-31-92 S105.000 MT INTfUST lATC ON lONDS IS 8.m.- INTEREST RATE ON SPECIAL 8f I—T8 It 9.m. CASK AID lIVCtTfCNTS SALANCE AT 12-31-90 S130.864 i i kU BONO BONO TAX YEAR PRINCIAPI INTEREST LEVY 3333 3XSXXKXXS XX38S3S3 ========= 1993 15,000 9,450 5,500 1994 15,000 8,081 5,900 1995 15,000 6,675 7,700 1996 15,000 5,231 7,200 1997 15,000 3,750 7,100 1998 15,000 2,250 7,000 1999 15,000 750 • TOTAL 105,000 ssxsxsssx 36,187 ========= 40,400 3XX3B83XX VI 44 Tfii IMP lOND D/S FUND DV 00 Page 36 fe.;: is- ■■ ■ ■ i'- Ila;. 1985IM I- CITY Of ORONO 45 1985 IMP BOND D/S fUND OBJECT DESCRIPTION 1989 ACTUAL AC I UAL 1991 APPROP 1991 EST ACTUAL 1992 DEPT REQUEST aSBS5SSBSSSS=SSSSSrSSSSrZS3SS==ZSrS£S==5SS£= Y-T-D 5-31-91 rsssrssrssr===ss===3as=r2=3r2r==33ss3s===*s=sass==sa*asas=as 1992 1992 NCR COUNCIL RECOMNO ADOPTED 41S9 ADNINISTRATIVE SER 400 460 980 245 980 900 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 400 460 980 245 980 900 0 0 4306 SPEC ASMIT FORECAST *##«TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 4322 PRINTING 4 PURLISH 3 3 TOTAL PRINTING 4 PURLISH 3 3 4610 ROND PRINCIPAL 50,000 50.000 50,000 50,000 60,000 4620 iOND INTEREST 57,525 54.275 50,900 50,900 47,400 4630 ■OND PATINO AGENT 675 677 730 730 700 MM TOTAL OEiT SERVICE 108,200 104,952 101,630 0 101,630 108,100 TOTAL 1m1108,603 105,415 102,610 245 102,610 109,000 0 0 aaaBaaaaaaaaaaassssBsaaxasaszraaassrsaa ssssassxBssszszasaasasaazssaasrsacassssassaaasacBaaaaaaaaaaaa Tilt fUMD MOOUMTt FOR TNC G.O. IMPROVENENT RONDS OF 1985. DATED 7*1*0. FIML NATtaiTT 1-1-2001. PRINCIPAL BALANCE OUTSTAMIIHG 12*S1*n tMOO.OW FUTURE DEBT SERVICE 1 TAX LEVY REQUIRED MT 1H1IRE8T RATE ON RONDS IS 7.92X; INTEREST RATE ON SPECIAL MDITt It 9.20%. ME MTMLE FRDN TNE COLLECTION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED MRINBT REIIEFITT0 PROPERTIES PLUS A GENERAL AD VALORUM fM lt¥IB MAINST ALL TAXABLE PROPERTT WITNIN TNE CITT. taiLE TM CITT DID LEVT 100X AS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THIS PROJECT T«M MS APPEALS NRICM MEN REDUCED HADE TRE TAX LEVY A MBIMNEMT TO PtOPfRLT FINANCE TNE PATNENT OF RONDS AND INTEREST. TAR UmSt BT OOLLICTION TEAR HAVE lEER: 1967. 40.000; 1988. 30.000; 1M. li.Ml 1990. 3S.OOO; 1991. 40.000; 19^ s6,000 fUTM EBTINATED TAX LEVIES REQUIRED ARE IRDICATED WITH THE DEBT BtaWBMNTt RCHEDUU. CRStI AMD IBVERTNEITB BALANCE AT 12-31-90 R1U.638 aaaaaaaaa BOND BOND ESTIMATED YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST TAX LEVY sszs SXSSSSSS3 szsaaasss 1993 60,000 43,080 50,000 1994 60,000 38,640 50,000 1995 60,000 34,080 50,000 1996 60,000 29,400 50,000 1997 75,000 24,600 50,000 1998 75,000 18,525 50,D00 1999 75.000 12,375 50,000 2000 75.000 6,187 50,000 TOTAL 540,000 206,887 400,000 ssassxzss saaaaxzas 190 IMP BOND 0/S FUND DV 00 Page 37 .J m CITY Of (MONO 72 IMTii OfEKATlNG FUND DIV 84 89-NUY 12 WTN TRUNK EXT page 38 1989 ACTUAL 1990 1991 Y-T-D 1991 EST 1992 DEPT 1992 MGR 4303 430S LEQAl 00N8ULTIIIG SERVICES EMIHEERINQ CONSULTING 1992 CCXJNCIL ACTUAL APPROP 5-3V90 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOmD ADOPTED REMARKS US«swamaBSBOssssssss8SSSsssz&s&ssssssssxrsss8B = ssss = = sssssszrssc = ? 7 = = s7sss:ssssrssr = s3s = s = = r:a 234 1259 1175 1200 SB42 400 Page 38 w tIHTRBSPage 39cm OF ORONO 72 mm OPERATING DIV 85 89-hut 12 UEU/PUMP/STRU 1989 ACTUAL 1990 ACTUAL 1991 APPROP 1991 T-T-0 EST 5-31-91 ACTU'.L U 0f> REQUEST 1992 .(jR COUNCIL .tCOH^O ADOPTED REMARKS :sss3s5*s*===sam*»e*ss===«s==a»«=aa**sss====ss 2scrsssa2=*sssar=s 4S0S ENGINEERING CONSULTING 5404 29822 2000 4S06 *«*• 4S23 4510 4531 OTHER CONSULTING SERVICES TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AOVERTIStNG TOTAL PRINTING-PUILISNING-AOV LAND t CASCNENTS SUR/WTR UTILITY CONSTR TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 1749 10601 2462 5000 7153 40423 0 3300 7000 0 0 0 e«BBCSSisssassscassssass = s«azsssssBSsssaasr £ = rssr Z5s3ss«3az=aasssss? rs 27 200 27 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 aaaaa«*«»«»«aaa3BBasasa33a3BS33aa333sa33aB3rssraaaaaaaasaaaaaaaaasaassaa 11500 21496 226902 117484 221000 TOTAL AMOUNTS THIS DIVISION 21496 238402 0 117484 221000 000 BaaaaaaBaaaaaaaaaBaaaaaaaeaasaaaaaaasaasaaxaer aasaB3easa3saz=a33aaas=3S3 28676 279025 0 120784 228000 000 caaaaaaa aaaasaea xraaaasa == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = === = = = == = = = = = = = a ssraaaaa r PROJECT SCHEDULED FOR COMPLETION 1991 1 K V . t^. ft miter operating OIV 85 89-NWT 12 UELL/PUMP/STRU Pc ‘ 4 ' ' ^ Ih' 'if'iiliir'ill Mti'*' i '.k U . _____ mcm or oMwo 72 UKT» OrCRATING niNO OlV 86 89-HWT 12 1MTER TOUE* Page 40 legal -consulting services ENGINEERING CONSULTING OTHER CONSULTING SERVICES TOTAL PROEESSIONAL SERVICES SUR/VTR UTILITY CONSTR TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL AMOUNTS THIS DIVISION 1991 1992 1992 1992198919901991 Y-T-D EST 0EP1 MGR COUNCILACTUALACTUALAPPROP 5-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOMMD ADOPTED a**at«a«sc=r*=3===x2x»«m*=s=3:-333===r====rz3====rzr==============T==-=== 7750 7750 49000 49000 300 421S0 42150 0 300 98900 0 98900 0 0 0 ^•**-**•*•*••***—-*-5sssaas3=*a*r3ssa*3sa3aaassa« -raaaaBeaara 167B1 453700 453700 0 16781 453700 0 453700 0 0 0 0 17081 ^52600 0 552600 0 0 0 •asaaaaa aaaaaaaa aaaeaaaa aaaaeaaa REMARKS MOJECT SCNEOULED fOR COMPLETION 1991 Ft MAT8I OPERATING TUND PIV 86 a9-tWT 12 UATE« TOUER Page 40 :MTRB8 CITT or OMMO 72 IMTII OrCRATlNO RW DIV 8S (MTEK IMP BONO 9-16-S9 Page 41 1991 1992 1992 1992 S';: 1989 1990 1991 T-T-D EST DEPT MGR COUNCIL ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 5-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOHMD ADOPTED 8«aassss8asass8xsssssxs8sssssazsss=ssssss3ssssz 333S3333SSS3SS33SS3S3=SSZr33333333=33: 4139 AONIN SERVICC 1760 440 1760 1750 TOTAL AMIN tCRVICC 0 0 1760 440 1760 1750 0 0 ZaSSaSSSB3SS«SSZ3S3333SSSSSZSS8S88S3S3 33333SS3333SSS3333 333333333333338ZSSSS33S333 4300 AUDITING & FINANCIAL 500 •«*«TOTAL fNOFESSIQNAL SERVICES 0 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 aaa88aaasaBC8aaaa8a8aaa833zsBas3S3 = s3S3S3s=333 = 3 = 3 = = 3333 3 3 = 3 = r = = 533333333=33333 = 3 4420 •OND INTEREST 17917 74975 74500 37070 74500 74500 4430 iOND'RATING AGENT FEES 393 91 2250 91 1000 1000 **•*TOTAL DENT SERVICE 18310 75066 76750 37161 75500 75500 0 0 aaaaaaa88aaaBaaaaaaaaa8ars8aes3asaaaas3aazaass==sz3aaa3K38338a3SS333saass33S33aa=r3 TOTM. MOUNTS TNIS DIVISION 18310 75566 78510 37601 77260 77250 0 0 aaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa saaaaaaaaaszaaaa 8388388883388 83833888338 88338333 883=3333338 REMARKS :sssrrr===========-== G.O. WATER % SEWER REVENUE BONOS SERIES 1989, DATED 9-16-89, MATURITY 2-1-2002 SaS388SSSSSSXZZSaSSSSS3SSS=S3&i9S3SS3XS8S=3aSBCrSSS = 3SSS TOTAL 'If •• I m ■Si' w llp^' m PR INC INT DISC INT 1 DISC 1990 0.00 74,139.65 310.00 74,449.65 1991 0.00 74,139.65 355.00 74,494.65 1992 0.00 74,139.65 355.00 74,494.65 1993 88,5 00 69,189.20 765.00 69,954.20 1994 88,533.00 63,707.57 H9.00 64,446.57 1995 101,180.00 5" '53.38 772.00 58,225.38 1996 101,180.00 j »f ..62 741.00 51,870.62 ^997 113,828.00 44 081.28 770.00 44,851.28 1998 113,828.00 36,862.72 736.00 37,598.72 1999 126,475.00 28,782.55 759.00 29,541.55 2000 139,123.00 19,813.37 778.00 20,591.37 2001 139,123.00 10,770.40 735.00 11,505.40 2002 151,770.00 834.74 750.00 1,584.74 ft 1,163,570.00 605,043.78 8,565.00 613,608.78 71 Mm OrOMTlM mo OIV m MTIR imp bond 9*16-S9^ ^ 'Paqe 41 E CITY OF OMMO 72 IMTCa 0KUTII6 FUND OIV 91 IttTEIt Page 42 OEPARTNENT r gf’’i ioW. itv' on ttS 1989 ACTUAL 1990 ACTUAL 1991 APPROP 1991 r-T-D EST 5-31-91 ACTUAL 1992 1992 1992 DEPT PtGR COUNCIL REQUEST RECONND ADOPTED REMARKS ■■s«Baa«9«««a««ss«SKa«sssssr«8«acsss9sss33ssssssssssssssssssssz=sz=rz==:r==-;srss8ssxssesaszsssarsss 4100 SALARIft-REOULAR EMPLOYEE 37570 41231 55680 15798 55950 58780 0111 OVERTINE-REOUUM EMPIOTEE 3933 4512 3000 1981 3500 3500 0119 ADMINIITRATIVE SERVICE 890 1000 1050 263 1050 1100 0101 PCRA-CITY OWTRIIUTION 1802 2000 2630 796 2660 2790 0102 FICO/a>CR*CITY OOHTRII 3107 3430 4490 1147 4550 4760 01S1 NOtfiTAllIATION inURANCE 1519 1866 2090 882 2110 2250 0112 LIFE IRSURANCi 11 13 10 7 10 10 Oils yORIOMn OONR INSURANCE 945 909 960 1053 1060 1300 •M*TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 49777 54961 69910 21927 70890 7A490 0 0 0210 OFFICE SUPPLIES 27 47 100 1 100 100 0220 NOTO^ FUELS 0 LUSRICANTS«1022 845 900 233 900 900 0l21 CLOTRINO 0 PERSONAL EQUIP 448 366 350 144 350 350 02S1 KM 0 8R0UN0S NOR SUPPLY 114 112 350 83 350 350 0232 lOUIPNSNT PARTS 0 ACCES 1589 1130 1000 40 1000 1000 0210 UTILITY SYSTEN HAINT SUPP 4053 6835 7200 2346 7200 7200 TOTK SUPPLIES-NAIN-REPAIR 7853 9335 9900 2847 9900 9900 0 0 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaassssssssssssssszsssssssssssssssasassrsssaxszzss 0100 AUOITIM 0 FINANCIAL 1620 1740 1830 1830 1630 osoi ENOIHEERINO CONSULTING 357 180 1500 1400 1400 V.,-1'4SM OTNIi CONSULTING SERVICES 162 481 93 100 100 •—TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2139 2401 3330 93 ma V w aa aa ^a aa a 3330 a 9 aa » 9 a aa aa a 3130 ft « * aa ^a mm mm ■* 0 0 0120 TELiPNONE 753 852 750 274 a ^a ^a «a a 850 850 S3SXZZBZS SS Z S S2 0121 POSTAGE 405 375 500 211 500 500 V-MM TOTAL GQMNUilCATlOMS 1158 1227 1250 485 1350 1350 0 0 MlimM 4 FUM.ItNIIM FtVEIflllW aaaaaaa8aa888aa88aa8ss3aassaac9saas8ss9s8ssas3aaza=xa==ssssz£dsssss8ss3a 02 93 250 150 150 TOYOi FtllTIM-FUa.lSMIW-/IDV 239 93 250 0 150 150 0 0 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa8zsaaaaaaa83asa3zzs=Bsssssssssssssssss3S3S3rscscss*;&:sa II Mm OmAIIMt fUM OIV 91 MTii OiPARTfKNT ■ fel. Page 42 Pago 43 4324 4340 4341 4342 4343 4345 4352 4354 4355 4356 435f 4370 4371 4sn UTILITIES TOTAL UTILITIES MAINT OFFICE EQUIPMENT NAINT AUTO EQUIPMENT MAINT NISC EQUIPMENT MAINT OLDCS A GMUNOS MAINT HATER MAINS A PUNT TOTAL CONTRACT MAINT-REPAIR lOCIt-ADMlN SERVICE lOCIt-CUSS 2 ASSESSMENT DATA PROCESSING TOTAL DATA PROCESSING MEETINOS-CONF-SCHOOLS INTER-OOVT SERVICES TOTAK OTNER CONTRACT SERVICE GENfRAl LIANILITT INSUR PROPUTT INSURANCE EQUIPMENT FLOATERS INSURANCE 1991 1992 1992 1992 1989 1990 1991 Y-T-0 EST DEPT MCR COUNCIL ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 5-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOMPO ADOPTED _ .. . . . 23336 20332 25000 4112 25000 25000 REMARKS 23336 20332 25000 4112 25000 25000 0 C 169 131 520 373 23081 186 475 510 728 21243 100 600 500 3000 21500 25 19 463 733 3834 150 600 500 3000 21500 200 600 500 3000 21500 24274 23142 25700 5074 25750 25800 KSB«s«BasaaaassBszBsaB=ss8aasBzszszsxsss3SSSsszss3ss====- 1604 1665 1660 578 1740 1870 0 ss 0 r 23 782 2386 ”i;r 42603 42958 1036 2406 95 500 1200884 2549 429 42066 49250 500 289 500 1150 0 1250 3360 1367 3390 3120 0 83zsBBaasaaaaaaasar3SBSB3ss3ass = s = s3 = = r = 800 154 800 800 0 = =3 7983 45400 49250 42495 laaasar 1010 2065 100 50050 8137 46200 50050 0 0 tasassBBCsa 333333*333as =3338=38*3332333 33=saaaaaaaar 1040 2140 100 2460 2070 20 2460 2070 20 ■Page 44 1991 1992 1992 1992 r r 5; k f lirr fe:I: 1989 1990 1991 T-T-0 EST DEPT MGR COUNCIL ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 5-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOMMD ADOPTED IIH8IIIIH• 4•MHNIIIIIIIIItII■HMMII11IIHHNNNItIIIInaHMuIIIIItIIIIMMIIIIItIIUIInuMnMIIIIMMNaIIIIaII14ItIIaanII4SI0 1i5 13 50 50 SO 41I1 TRAVEL•NIIEAOE-PARKING 6 87 100 TOO 4383 LICENSES 8 TAXES 285 56 120 73 SO 120 4387 DEPRECIATION/M10NTI2ATION 36273 38796 36270 38800 38800 4399 OTHER CHARGES 1951 0 0 ••••TOTAL OTBR CHARGES 36569 40816 36440 160 39030 39070 0 0 BBBBBBBBaiBBBBSBBaBaaBzaaaaaaBBaBaaaaaaaaazeaaaaaaaaaaaaeaaBaaasasaaEsaaa 4855 INT EXP'INTERFUND LOANS 977 733 490 TOTAL OTHER OISaUMENENTS 977 733 490 0 0 0 0 0 REMARKS TOTAL AMOUHTt THIS DIVISION TOTAL AMOUNTS THIS FUND ■v^MSVasasBBBraBvasisaasssssisamsaa aszsssassr s .sss3s«ssasss:3«sss = 2=ss : 5s 196817 202823 230S80 U202 231170 238240 0 0 BaaBBBBSBBBBBBBBBBBaasBBaaaaBBBBBSsanzsasssiaEsssaBaaaaBSEssBasaassBcazss 308201 613288 861690 204051 1090730 315490 BaaBBBBB BBBaaasa aaeaaaaa BBBBaaaa aLtaaBBaa saaaaase aaasaaaa ==seaa:a Wf iTi'h- '■ IN ADDITION TO TNE OPERATING EXPENSES THE FOUOWIHG CAPITAL OUTLAT FROM OPERATIONS IS ANTICIPATED 1991 1992 BBa 0 aaaa 0 ^ b-‘'• I: mTtt OPERATINQ FUND OlV 91 UATER DEPARTMENT % m: yit Page 44 cmr ' .i PpsmBik I CITY or OtONO n cost OPCtATINQ FUlO DIV 81 89HS 10 A 43 REFIACEMENT 1989 1990 1991 Page 45 1991 EST 1992 OEPT 1992 MGR 1992 COUNCIL I T-T-D ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 5-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOMMD ADOPTED REMARKS «*«*«sa«»****»a*a«aaaaea2satt2«asrafissa=ssss3crrrssssss=5s====3st:s»s=ss5s:=a=2=ss:r»5s=tarsssssas5== = 2s h S'¥' 003 LEGAL-CONSULTIHO SERVICES 524 256 4305 0 EMGIIIEERIIIG CONSULTING 18497 1064 1349 1500 4306 OTNER CONSULTING SERVICES 8759 10101 425 450 •***TOTAL PtOFESSIONAL SERVICE 27780 11421 0 1774 1950 0 0 0 f % saassi 099 m OS1 Sr: TOfM.'fc,:; Wf OTHCR CHMQCS TOTAL OTHER CHARGES SHR/WTR UTILITY COHSTR TOTAL CAPITAL OUTUV WNTS THIS OlVISlOH lamaaaascacsssssr== = ==========:===r====== = = = ===-=- = = = :: = = :=== = = = === = 434 300 300 0 434 0 300 300 0 0 0 taaa«MSSBS«ss«3s«ssxss3sxssssxssesssssssss3ssB=sssssat=scss3sss=s==s=ss 115453 88926 115453 88926 taxsasaasaaBssasi «V. •s®5' 0 0 0 0 0 0 ■ 3S3SaaBXSSS:SX = SSBn3S8B = SZSSSSS9S = = = = = = = 3 = = 33 = = = 8 3B3 143233 100781 0 2074 2250 0 0 0 sxBBBKxa xasssBaB ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== E PROJECT SCMBNJLED FOR CCNPIETIOH 1990 f® c : ft wm ■ k' ■■■ kii-W-r' E'';.PfmM 111 w -li-'mmmm'RP‘"HR Mm, iPtMTlM FMi »tV II M-iS 10 8 43 ttPUCIMENT fasEl :-:; ./EfeS'’ Page 45 ■■ cm Of OMMO n ttIKt OKUTIilQ FUND 01¥ 82 89-HWY 12 SIM MIN EXT Page 46 [■ 1991 1909 1990 1991 T-T-0 EST ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROf 5-51-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOMND ADOPTED ■SS«MS«Bass«BBB«ssS3ssssesaa«aBSSss««aas3a3*T = = = r r : = = :3r = :s = s3sss = = :r:=xzss: 1992 DEPT 1992 1992 MGR COUNCIL REMARKS :rS3=r33S3=SS33==SSSSS= UOl LEGAL-CONSULTING SERVICES 2523 2454 1947 2000 4505 ENGINEERING CONSULTING 10955 4118 465 500 4506 OTNER CONSULTING SERVICES 7155 9542 138 150 BBBB 1 TOTAL PROfEUIONAL SERVICE 20415 15894 0 2550 2650 0 0 0 4J99 i ¥ I OTHER CHARGES TOTAL OTHER CHARGES •UR/WTR UTILITY OONSTR TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL AMUNTS THIS DIVISION aBBBaBBSBaBSaS3BaSS33BSSaS383S33S3ZSSS3SSSSSSSSS33rSSSSas33SS3SB333S333B 250 0 iBSMaaai 103682 250 0 0 0 0 0 0 TBS33S3SSSSSSSr3S=BS3=SrSaS=S=3SSSSS===SSSS9==333333333333333 22701 1(0662 22701 0 0 0 0 0 0 IBBBBBBBBBBBSS 3BB = S = 33aSa3SS3Se33S = S33 = 3 = 33 = S = = = = S = S: = 3 = =S333=3S3 = SS = = = S 124095 58845 0 2550 2650 0 0 0 B3B8BBBB SB3BB8BS 88BBXSSB B88SSSBB 33383388 S333BSS3 333333=3 8X3=3338 PBM8CT POR COMPLETION 1990 ■ip- n;T'' i? «■ nan MT1N8 ran OlV 82 89-HWY 12 SWR MIN EXT Page 46 mmm)SNR83 i CIfY or OMNO Page 47 73 SCWfi OPERATING FUND DIV 83-B9 HUY 12 SW TRUNK iW> 1989 1990 1991 Y-T-0 1991 EST 1992 OEPT 1992 1992 MGR COUNCIL !*'■ftf' 4303 LEQAL-OONSULTING KRVICES 4303 ENGINEERING CONSULTING 4306 OTHER CONSULTING SERVICES TOTAL PtOFESSlONAL SERVICE WR/VTR UTILITY CONSTR TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 5*31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOMMO ADOPTED REMARKS sa8sssaa«Ba3scssssss««sxs3zssszssss=s=s==sss=£ssss:sszzs=s=ssss338ss3sszrs:s:ssss=3=sss== 7800 7800 ==r===-=== 48000 1625 50000 48000 48000 4SS1 0 1625 105800 0 0 103800 0 0 aaaa8888aaa88aaaaaaaaamaa=xzssasBszzs:3s=s====s3SS3aas=ss===ss=3=zss=s=sz 4S0000 4S0000 TOTAL AMOUNTS THIS DIVISION 0 0 430000 0 0 450000 0 0 aaaaauBBaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaasaaaasaaszszzszzazsszaaaaassasxasassaazzssssrs 0 1625 555800 0 0 553800 0 0 zzaxBBBZ azaazzaz aaaaaaaa aasszsaa aasszszz zsszzzzz zzzzzzzz zzzzzzzz tv-'. • '0 PROJECT SCHEDULED FOR COMPLETION 1991. fe ■ ;-L‘ ITING MND DIV B-fP NUT 12 SHR TRUNK IMP Page 47 bV ^ ‘CITY OF ORMO 7S lEIIIR OKUTmC HMD PAGE 40 41S0 MDNIM tCRVICC TOYAL MMIN SERVICi MJDIYIM i FINMICIAL TOTAL FMFEttlOMAL SCtVICE KMD IRTEREtT MNP FATINO AGENT FEES TOTAL PENT SERVICE OIV 89 SEUER IM> lOND 9*16-89 1991 1992 1992 1992 1989 1990 1991 T-TD £ST OEPT MGR COUNCIL ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP S-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOMMD ADOPTED Bac«asM«s«SBanss«ssB«sss5zssssssszssss2ss:s = = = = = sss::sss=s:ss==2 = srssss = = = = = 3«sssss = : = = = = = = 1690 A23 1690 1700 REMARKS zr=:SSS3ZZ=S232SSS3ZSS 0 0 1690 423 1690 1700 0 0 BBaB8B8BBBBa8aB8aaaaBBB8SSBBaaBaaSSaSaSSSSSSC3==SSaSS33SSaS8S3=aa3SS223ZSSS2SSSSSC=BS2SS soo #**# M2Q 4»0 #### rarilL MOUiTS THIS DlVltim 0 500 00 0 00 0 888BaBa8BBaaaBBBBa8888S388X8388SSS8S3 = = =SS:Z = S33 2SS = :rSSC3 2S = S3S3 2S = 2SS2ZSSS2:S8eS = 3SS = S 17499 72188 72760 3620S 72760 727rj 570 89 2210 89 1000 1000 17077 72277 74970 56294 73760 75760 0 0 BB8aBBaBB8a8aBBBB8888888BSa88a88888a8KS8SXX38S« ^338 3333338 3833888 3333S3323SS3S3S83ZSSSSS 17877 72777 76660 36717 75450 75460 0 0 88888888 88888888 88888888 88888888 838888888SS88 BSSS88888S888 888838888 3338838838888 G.O. yATER SEWER REVENUE BONDS SERIES 198S^ DATED 9-16-89, FINAL NATURITY 2-1-2002 883388X8833338883833X33383 2333 8338323X333 33332 8 38X3 3 3 32 3 TOTAL PR INC INI DISC PRINC A IHT 1990 0.00 72,410.36 303.00 72,713.36 1991 0.00 72,410.36 346.00 72.756.36 1992 0.00 72,410.36 346.00 72,756.36 1993 86,470.00 67,575.38 748.00 68,323.38 1994 86,467.00 62,221.60 722.00 62,943.60 1995 98,820.00 56,113.29 753.00 56,866.29 1996 98,820.00 49,937.04 724.00 50,661.04 1997 111,172.00 43,053.10 752.00 43,805.10 1998 111,172.00 36,002.90 718.00 36,720.90 1999 123,525.00 28,111.20 741.00 28,852.20 2000 135,877.00 19,351.22 761.00 20,112.22 2001 135.877.00 10.519.18 718.00 11,237.18 2002 148,230.00 815.27 733.00 1,548,27 1,136,430.00 590,931.26 8,365.00 599,296.26 71 lEiCS OIV 09 lEUER INP ROND 9-16-89 XXSSSSXXXXSXS 8S8888888SS88 888XXS8S8 8388888X88888 PAGE 48 I' f: v 173SWR92 cm or OMNO n SCVEI OPERATING fUNO OlV 92 SEVER DEPARTMENT Page 49 4100 4111 4119 4141 4142 4111 4»2 41S1 MM 4210 4220 4221 4232 4234 MM 1991 1992 1992 1992 1989 1990 1991 YI-0 EST DEPT MGR COUNCIL ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 5-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST KCom) ADOPTED REMARKS -=**B**«*«*c=a*c3 = a2r 3 = r = = = s** = 5S3 r = = === = = = = = = = = rs=r = = = rs=rr3 = = = r 3=2 s=32 ==rr = i:r»s = 3=3= = 3=== = * = = =: === SAIMHES-KEGULM EMPLOYEE OVERTIME ftEGULAK EMPLOYEE MDMIMISTRATIVE SERVICE PERA-CITU CONTRItUTION MCA/MDCR CITY CGMTRIR MOIPI TALI EAT ION INSURANCE LITE INSURANCE comp insurance TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICED OEFICE SUPPLIES MOTOR rUELS A LUSRICANTS aOTNING A PERSONAL EQUIP EQUIPMENT PARTS A ACCES UTILITY SYSTEM MAINT SUPPLY TOTAL SUPPLIES-MAIN-REPAIR 61098 62460 83430 23369 83800 88060 *590 6446 4000 2423 5800 6000 1220 1380 1460 365 1460 1530 2839 5031 3930 1155 4010 4210 *891 5165 6710 1587 6850 7200 2277 2911 3370 1323 3180 3400 18 20 20 11 20 20 2355 2728 3440 3601 3600 3430 79288 8*1*1 106360 3383* 108720 113850 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaazsaaaaaaaa3333333 3 233 83 3= 23333233; 2* 88 50 17 50 50 2050 1464 1600 365 1500 1500 361 492 500 130 500 500 0 0 ========= 1911 1542 276 1066 1200 800 185 44 1200 600 1200 800 4622 4652 4150 4050 4050 S«Baa«SSBB«BSBS«SaB8CaSSZaSS3rBSSBS3CS&S3XSSSSSSSS2SS2=3S222S2=S2S2S=S2= 4300 AUDITING 4 riHANCIAL 1900 2051 2150 2150 2070 4301 IfGAL-OONaiLTING KRVICtS 193 200 200 200 4305 EM6INUIING COmULTING 1878 707 1200 225 1200 1200 4304 OTMER 00NaN.TING KRVICEt 206 728 140 140 0 MM TOTAL PtOfESSIOHAl KRVICES 4179 3*86 3550 :..5 3690 3470 0 0 laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaxsaaaseaaaasaaaassaaxssaaassaaasxasxsasass 4320 TELEPNGME 293 332 750 111 400 400 4321 POSTAQI 82’78*1000 423 1200 1200 MM TOTAL CGMNUNICATIQHS 1114 1116 1750 534 1600 1600 0 0 BBaB8aa8aas8Baaaaaaa3aasaaa83ra3asss828xxzss3 = 2s = 3 23 2 = s = s = 22 = = 2B = = = 2 = 2 = 3 '.,v' ; OPUATING PUMO DIV 92 88R DfPARTKMT Page 49 ■ V ; ^5'- .. r . •S.;. .... Page 50 ■V; 4S22 4323 4324 4331 m4« 4340 4341 4342 4344 4332 4353 4354 4355 4354 4310 4in 4373 4374 4377 437f 43M 43i1 MtlNIlHG t PMUSNING MVERflSING TOTAL raiNTING-PUOLISHlNG-AOV UTILITIES TOTAL UTILITIES EOUIfiCNT t MAC AENTAL TOTAL lENTALS MAINT OmCE EOUIPMENT NAIHT AUTO EOUIAMENT mioT Nisc Eoumnir NAINT LINCS-LIFT STATIONS TOTAL CONTRACT HAIR-REPAIR lOOIS-AONIN SERVICE OOURIER-OATA PROCESSING LOQIS-CLASS 2 ASSESSMENT BATA PROCESSING TOTAL DATA PROCESSING MEETINGS-CONF-SCNOOLS TOTAL OTHER CONTRACT SERVICE GENERAL LIAIILITT INSURANCE PROPtRTT INSURANCE EGUIPMENT FLOATERS INSURMICE AUTOMOTIVE INSURANCE IMMELU LlAIILin IRSURMACE r IRANCE AGENT OF RECORD TOTAL INSURANCES NDMHSNI^t TRAVIL-NlLiAGE-PARKIN6 1991 1992 1992 1992 1989 1990 1991 T-T-D EST OEPT NCR COUNCIL ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 5-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOMO ADOPTED soaBBSSTSBesaiases^ssr s = = :sssssssssss3s:sr rszs = = rrr:s=£ssssss« = = ss = :s:-s = = s REMARKS rrrs=r =rr=r= 331 155 100 21 100 100 73 404 155 100 21 100 100 0 0 BBBSBaS«BS«SB3SaaS3S3Si4SSSSSS838S«aSaTSS==r=3Z=r=SZS=SSSSSaSSS323S3S=SS3 107M 14737 13000 4042 13000 13000 10784 14737 15000 4042 13000 13000 0 0 1338X8888888888888383838383888888888 500 500 500 0 0 500 0 500 500 0 0 •*»»»8388»8SSSS* ^ = 3 = 2*3333333333833333283333333333333238337^ = 333-3333 = 333 316 317 540 25 540 500 466 633 600 6 600 600 1211 1690 1600 525 1600 1600 19056 16811 25000 3069 25000 25000 21049 19451 27540 3625 27540 27500 0 0 BBBaa3Saa8a33S388Baaas83SC3388888S3338883833833333888383333883333383=333 3257 3838 3860 1348 4040 4360 25 16 20 20 20 760 759 760 0 2012 2070 2800 617 2470 2670 5294 5924 7440 2724 7290 7050 0 0 888888838388888388888888888388838888X8888883 371 130 800 251 BOO BOO 371 130 800 251 BOO 800 0 0 B8888V8aS8888838a8S8SSa8388S88S888Sa88Za38333SSSSZSS3SBB23 338 3 3 88 8 3333 33 5000 6063 5500 5500 5500 141 120 130 140 1.0 145 154 160 2B0 280 858 766 800 820 820 1785 1766 1830 1B30 1830 162 154 160 170 170 ao9i 9023 8580 0 B740 8740 0 0 8888888888888888883888338388883338833333333333232338333338832=3333332333 10 13 20 20 20 153 205 150 75 150 200 u > r . Page 50 r Pc;ge 51 f¥ h'- i-.k 1909 1990 1991 T-T-O esT DEPT MGR COUNCIL ACTUAL ACTUAL APPPOP 5-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECQMD ADOPTED raass«m«ss«s«samflsi«xaBsissssssssssss=ssszzs3Ss:ssrsrzssssaKszzs8Ss = ss = = r ss s ASn UCCNSEt 8 TAXES 875 340 170 278 280 300 4387 OEPRECIATIOa/ANORTIZATION 130525 132006 130530 132100 132100 439S SPEC EQUIP ICPlACEfCNT 36 35 40 40 40 4393 MCC CURRENT CHAROES 219106 210444 226970 73961 226970 237090 4396 NUCC FINAL COST PRIOR YR -55832 •55870 •56410 *18803 -56410 -7610 TOTAL OTHER CHARGES ?94873 295253 301470 55511 303150 362140 0 0 4531 SWR/WTR UTILITY OONSTR 2627 MM TOTAL CAPITAL OUTUT 0 0 0 2627 0 0 0 0 BBsaBBBaaaBaaBSsasasssaBBBBBBBBaaaassssssrassr^BBaaaBsaaaBsaBBB 4850 REFUHOS 8 REIMMJRSENENTS 254 MM TOTAL OTHER OISNURSENENTS 254 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .SBBBBBBaaiBBBaSBBasTSBBBSBBaBSaaBBBBraB SXBB3SSSZBBS sassa TOTAL ANOUNTS.TNIS OIVISIOM 43032i 438068 475240 104255 479180 542800 0 0 BaaaBSNrsB«ftaasaa«sawzssBasaaa«s««asax8szs9ssses93scaBSSSsBssss33ssBS«saB TOTHL MOUNTS TNIS FIM 715528 652093 1107700 145594 559530 1172060 0 aaaAaaaa BaaBBBBB BBBSBBBB SBazssra ssrsasss assszrss la ABOITIOM TO TNi aPfRATIM EXPENSES TNC FOUOUING CAPITAL OUTLAY FROM OPERATIONS IS ANfriPATEO 1991 1992 BBBB BBSS LIFT STATION « 9 0 65000 LIFT STATION • 11 65000 0 LIFT STATION SATTCST SACKUPS 6000 EMERORNCT ELEC OUTLET LS 14,15.16,17 2500 NONE • JET TRUC^2200 ROOT CUTTER 1000 AUK POMER ADAPTERS 27, 28. 2^F 1500 HOIST FOR PULLINO PUMPS 7500 PORTAOIE PUMPS 1000 02800 75700 REMARKS ===S3S*2=2»-==*---S 1 j* i QKRATIM RMO OlV 92 SCUER DEPARTNMT Page 51 m ■f i' ;■ CITY Of 74 OOLf 4100 4111 4120 4139 4141 4142 4151 4152 4153 4210 4220 4231 4232 424T 4242 OROMO COURSE ORU*TiNb FUM> DIV 93 GOLF COURSE SALARIIS-REOULAR EMPLOYEE OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEE SALMIES-TEMP EMPLOYEES MMIHISTRATIVE SERVICE PERA-CITY CONTRIWTION FICA/MDCR-CITY CONTRIIUTIQM NOSPiTALI2ATION INSURANCE LIFE INSURANCE WORKMANS COMP INSURANCE TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICE OFFICE SUPPLIES M9TO0 FUELS S LUBRICANTS CLOTlliNC !t PERSONAL EQUIP BLOG A GROUNDS MU SUPPLY EQlMPMENr PARTS 4 ACCES BOOKS i PERIODICALS RISC MAINT SUPPLIES TOTAL SUPPLIESy^IH AEPAIR Page 52 1991 1992 1992 1992 1989 1990 1991 Y-T 0 EST DEPT mgr council ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 5-31-91 ACTUAL REOI" 1 RECOMM) ADOPTED ■■s22S8Ss»*aer=2zrsaarssrrrrssrsrrssassarssrrrasT zsrarasssssasssarasrarzzsssrr 5407S 35742 35640 15240 35980 37060 91 56 0 0 12684 14860 13300 r i5 15000 15500 1100 1260 1460 365 1460 ^"'30 1480 1593 16 •683 1610 1660 2738 2975 2920 956 3900 h02^ 2292 2533 2770 1386 2770 2860 20 9 20 4 10 ‘0 957 1021 1250 1721 1220 1280 55637 59999 58960 22690 61950 63940 0 0 ••*B**B**B*BBaaaaaaaararsaaraxaaaaaasassaacaarssszars zaaaaasara.. aacaaraa 265 302 350 5 350 350 671 1755 1500 495 1500 1500 153 168 V. "39 160 160 1088 1439 5ou0 637 3600 450C 1010 1061 730 279 730 730 10 10 0 195 59 3362 4784 6340 1465 6350 7240 0 0 •: t • : - C «"*s**s#s?s**xe = sa2sesss**aBsru2 2a2s = 2sss3 = = = rr = 5=r = r = z = ca = r = = r r s = = r = = = 55s 4300 AUDITING 4 FINA»..ms 1290 1390 1460 1460 1330 4308 OTNEP OON^TINC 50 50 0 •**«TOT «L PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 1290 1390 1460 50 i510 1330 0 0 4310 .ELEPNQME 1205 •2.Vf 18BBSZ3TnrBBsaaaaa'- 130U 338 3S.^A8az = 1300 rzarr2rrrsr232a£2X£r = 2a-_32 1300 4H1 POSTA6E 5 50 3 50 50 •M*TOTAL COmUNICATIONS 1210 1236 iSO 34;350 1350 0 0 4322 PtlNIIRa 4 PUBLISNINC 676 627 2000 ' saaa* s.. 1067 'Ssaaa= s::r asa2 £ s s£z = si 222 2000 2000 4323 ADVEITItING 2093 1728 2500 8 2500 2500 TOTAL PBIHTINQ-PUBLISNIMG-AOV 2769 2355 :500 2355 4500 4500 0 0 - -^aRLSRiBaSKSBaBaaaaaasaxzBsasaassscssszvBXsass Aacsssssasasan BOIF OOURBB OPERATING FUND DIV 93 GOLF C9'«SE Page 52 Page 53 W! 1992 1992 1992 1989 1990 1991 t-T-D EST O'PT NCR COUMUL ACTUAL ACTUAL APPR09 S-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOHMO ADOPTED REMARKS SS3SSSSBSBBS«ESSS3333ZS8SeBZSSSSSS3;38SZBSXSS3S=SSrSSSrSSSSSSSSSSSSSSe333Sr==rr=S33SS3==SS=rssrssssa 4124 UTILITIES 3565 2137 3000 767 3000 3000 TOTAL UTILITIES 3565 2137 3000 767 3000 3000 0 0 *aa»«***a*3r3333xzssssaaxarr = = = = = = rrz 2 ================================== 4131 EQUIPMENT i MAC RENTAL 5856 6327 6450 961 6450 6450 TOTAL RENTALS 5856 6327 6450 961 6450 6450 0 0 4140 MAINT OEFICE EQUIPMENT 15 1 :ssz3sass <1ilIIII41IIIIIIIIIIIIMII14IIIIIIIIIINMII•4II•14341 MAIN? AUTO EQUIPMENT 65 657 700 905 1000 700 4342 MAINT MISC EQUIPMENT 1564 1997 1650 703 1650 1650 4343 MAINT RLDGS 4 GROUMOS 6417 4867 4200 1825 4200 12000 TOTAL CONTRACT MAIN-REPAIR 8046 7672 6550 3433 6850 14350 0 0 4354 MEET IN6S-CtMf - SCHOOLS 55 135 100 BBBSSSasSSar38X3 = 3 = = = = = = = XS8-S = = = = SaSSSS s = = = 70 100 200 TOTAL OTHER CONTRACT SERVICE 55 135 100 70 100 200 0 0 4370 GENERAL LIARIL ITT INSURANCE B3SSSeSaSS = a3SSXSS33S3BBST JS 5703 6190 640. • = SB = B = B*= = 8 3 = = = = = = = = = = - = = = = = = = === = = = = = = = = = = 6400 64u0 4371 PROPERTY IN. >jUICE 641 6U.480 480 4372 ROILER 4 MACNINERT INSUR 60 60 60 4173 EQUIPMENT FLOATERS INSURANCE 155 170 250 250 4374 AUT1M0TIVE INSURANCE 305 355 250 260 260 4370 HQKYS 4 SECURITY 41 40 40 40 4377 UMRELLA LIARI'ITY INSURANCE 2690 2683 2770 2770 : 4370 DRAM SMO.> INSURANCE 1575 1575 1630 1575 1380 i4un 4370 INSURANCE AGENT OF RECORD 65 62 60 60 60 •M*TOTAL iNRUhANCES 11134 11648 11920 1435 11700 11720 0 0 PAVING PARKING LOT FURNACE REPAIR OTHER 7000 1500 3500 12000 SS8T l3BCS*S*3a=3rS3 = SS = r = S=23 = = = = = = =xr-rs-??SS= = SS3=3SS2SSCSS3 n aOLf COURSE OSCRATIIIfi niM) DIV 93 GOLF COURSE i'.’ Page 53 ifi!e 199: 1992 1992 19921989 1990 1991 T-T-D tST OEPT MGR COUNCILACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 5-31-91 ACTUAL REQUEST RECOHK) ADOPTED REMARKS sssasBBasa«ssssasssaa8asxaaxx8ssz3zsssssrs£ssss2=s3S£^3Ssssssssssrs=z5=:7 7S ssssasssssss:;Page 54 4380 MEMBERSHIPS 320 375 350 365 370 350 4381 TRAVEL-MlLEAfiE-PARK1 MG 50 50 50 4383 LlCERSEt 1 TAXES 480 285 290 190 290 290 4387 OEPRECIAT lOM/AMORT IZAT ION 4501 4464 4500 4500 4500 4393 SPEC EQUIP REPLACEMENT 11 13 #*#*TOTAL OTHER CNARGES 5312 5137 5190 555 5210 5190 A3«0 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 0 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaxxxxaaaaxsazszaasazaazzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzssxxzzxzzzzzzzr S334 Page 54 Page 55 ^ Curr Otpt Adiin Vr Qty ItQ Ktcoai Aiteln Totalt Oopt Election Finarct Covt/bldoBldg/Zon Street Perk Dept Otpt Dtpl Dept Otpt Otpf Witffr Otpt Stiitr Otpt Coif Otpt Police Other Dept '•pti 9UKIC yoncf coomi 92 11 91 92 I ifHtT wmmi 91 92 9t 92 47.600 4«'.050 19.600 40.000 12.730 34,170 10,220 31.140 2.300 (.01) 2.452 (.01) 1.960 (.05) 2,040 (.01) 1,637 (.05) 1,729 (.05) 1.511 (.01) 1,517 (.01) 21.420 (.45) 4.760 (.10) 4,760 (.10) 9,520 1.20) 4,760 (.10) 22.064 (.45) 4.905 (.10) 4.903 (.10) 9.006 (.20) 4.903 (.10) 13.060 (.35) 3.960 (.10) 7,920 (.20)11.000 (.30) 14.200 (.35) 4.000 (.10) 6.160 (.20)12.240 (.30) 11,456 (.35) 3,2n (.10) 6,546 (.20) 9,019 (.30) 12,100 (.35) 3.457 (.10) 6.914 (.20)10.571 (.30) 25,687 (.05) 3,022 (.10) 26.469 (.05) 3,114 (.10) rr Page 56 r cm w Niltiwi MVICSt M.LOCATIOi •? WMTMEMT wm itiiMiftt Acniftt cott n mt tum mccT tiauitT/tccaMiDATioH Curr A^ln lltctlon Flnvict Tr aty Itq i«cM T«tiU D«pt Of^t Cort/bld«it<i9/2»» Str^t Pirt Dept Dept Drot Dtpt water Oepf Seicer Dept Coif Oept Police Other Oept Oeptt COUMC S,600 l.DOO COUDC 11.600 11.600 Asset 1.1K (.05) 1.114 (.05) 49.240 52.000 123.91S 127.630 409.600 429.600 24.930 25.600 19.510 19.090 0.150 0.400 Page 56 cOmuuugt PfOBlX 1 ITV Of OMMO UNULATIVF SUOCET INFORMATION ENiML FOND RCVINUiS (EST) ;N0ITORES (EST) C1UM. REVENUES EXKNDITORES ENOAL FOND REVENOES OVER (ORDER) EXPENOITORES ACTUAL ROraiTY TAX LEW LEW UNIT INCUMt NONESTEAD CREDIT) LEW LIMIT OORAL FOND LEW XOF LEW V ■OEttftlu. FiMD mClAt LEVIES oTAi mmul rtMo all levies Axn At ^ 01 OiMtAL rUND lUDGEI ESI I', I i Is 1^'- V' fe-C > ; . PAGE 57 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1088 1989 1990 1991 1992 1,602.184 1.611.752 1.772,^25 1,758.014 1,876,193 1.853,525 2.163.193 2,203.383 2.322.590 2.322.590 2.461.070 2.491.070 2.664.565 5,122.550 2.924.010 2.876.180 3.040.260 3.040.260 3.129.330 3.129.330 1.864.019 1.632.011 2.061.930 1,786.613 2.129,764 1,781.311 2.343.116 2,126,563 2,567.914 2.246.748 2.751.232 2.489.422 2.863.897 5.141.232 2.951.471 2,900.516 232.008 275.317 348.453 216.553 321,166 261.810 (2,277.335)50,955 921.573 909.573 1.090,109 1.021,426 1,155,992 1,001,044 1.288.746 1,089,557 1.389,395 1,206.520 1.263.426 1.263.426 1.352.690 1.352.690 1.585.546 1.585.546 1,644.831 1,644.831 1,644,831 1,644,831 98.6X 93.7X 86.6X 84.5X 86.8X 100.OX 100.ox 100.ox 100.0X 100.0X 5,910 11,850 921.573 1,090,109 1.155,992 1.288.746 1,389,395 1,263,426 1.352,690 1.585,546 1.650.741 1,656,681 •sasaaaBsssxs aaaaaaasasass cassssEsxssaa ssrssaasssaass zaaasaaaasaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaa aassaasMiBaaa 56.7X 57.6X 53.3X 50.4X 51.9X 51.3X 50.8X 54.2X 54.3X 52.9X PAGE 57 ... ■7^ rI.- r.: .1 * . r % i(^ TO; PROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Tom Kuehn, Finance Di tec tot '>>■ 7 ^ August 8, 1991 t. SUBJECT: Resolution to Estaolish Expenditures for the HRA as a Loan from the City Attachment:A. Proposed Resolution Regardin'" Authorization of Expenditures in Anticipation of the Issuance of Lease Revenue Bonds ISSUE - Resolution to be adopted prior to the issuance of lease revenue bonds. DISCUSSION - The federal government has issued new regulations relating to the conditions under which cities are able to issue tax>exempt bonds to reimburse themselves for moneys spent before the bonds are issued. One of the requirements is a preliminary resolution adopted at or prior to the time the expenditures are incurred, expressing the intent of the city to issue bonds to reimburse prior expenditures. The attached resolution satisfies this requirement. I have used the maximum e timated gross cost of $4.6 million and maximum estimated bond issue of $4.0 million (resolution item #3). I have also listed the various funds from which we may borrow to finance the project (resolution item #5). Identifying the dollar amounts and specifying the funds d'>es not obligate the City to spend those amounts but d -“s j!ce it possible to recoup any money spent from this poin* i fo'. this project from the bonds if and when they are issued. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that Council adopt the attached resolution to establish future expenditures for this project as a loan from the City to the HRA, to be repaid from bonds issued. to adoptPROPOSED MOTION - Moved by_, seconded by _ Resolution # Relating to Proposed City Hall, Police Department and Public Works Facilities; Authorizing the Expenditure of Moneys in Anticipation of the issuance of Lease Revenue Bonds. Ayes , Nays h RBSOLOTIOH RELATING TO PROPOSED CITY HALLr POLICE DEPARTMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS FACILITIES; AOTHORISING THE EXPENDITURE OF MONETS IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF LEASE REVENUE BONDS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counci I of the City of Orono, Minnesota, as follows: 1, The City has determined that it is necessary to undertake certain public improvements consisting of a new City Hall and Police Department and Public Works Department facilities (collectively, the ••improvements"), to be undertaken by the City pf its Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA"). The City presently intends that some or all of the improvements will be financed with the proceeds of lease revenue bond*^ the interest on which is excludable from gross income under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Bonds"), issued by the HRA, in one or more series as needed for the payment of the costs of the Improvements. The improvements will be leased to the City on rentals sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds, and the City will derive the moneys for payment of the lease rentals from ad valorem tax levies. 2. The City has been ^divsed that the Internal Revenue Service has issued new regulations relating to the conditions under which municipal issuers ate able to issue tax-exempt obligations to reimburse themselves for expenditures incurred prior to the issuance of the obligations. One of the requirements for the issuance of tax-exempt obligations is a preliminary resolution or other official action of the governing body, adopted at or prior to the time the expenditures are incurred, expressing the intent of the municipality to issue taxable or tax-exempt obligations to reimburse prior expenditures. 3. The City hereby declares ics present intention to cause the HRA to issue the Bonds to provide the moneys necessary to finance the costs of acquisition and construction of the Improvements. The currently estimated cost of the Improvements is approximately 34,600,000 and the City estimates that the principal amount of Bonds to be issued will be approximately $4,000,000. r-p'r I >r .t !-• [•; y' i fi’- rr; I •«.. f-iV V..f .. .VHi* ! ) -■' V. 4. The City intends to rei;.iburse itself from the proceeds of the Bonds for any costs of acquisition and construction incurred and paid after the date hereof by the City or the HRA in connection with the Improvements, to the extent such coats are allowable under the law and approved by the City. The City presently anticipates that the HRA will issue the Bonds for the re mbursetnent of such costs within one year from the date on which the Improvements are completed. 5. It is anticipated that the expenditures for costs of acquisition and construction of the Improvements will be paid from the City's Building Outlay, General, Water Operating, Sewer Operating and Permanent Improvement Revolving fund(s), and that the reimbursement will include the interest paid on any temporary borrowing from funds of the City during the construction period. The primary source of funds to pay debt service on the Bonds will be the lease rentals to be paid by the City, and the City will levy ad valoreum taxes to provide the moneys for the payment of the lease rentals. Adoj,-ced this 12th day of August, 1991 Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk jy • ,V r r. V|||k^ $TATI OF I^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES^. 500 LAFAYETTE ROAD • ST. PAUL MINNESOTA • 55155 tQ^ % % ONR INFORMATION («12) 2««-«1S7 rf' By i vB t. s':- r I- H. m ►-V*: w ?? July 22, 1991 The Honorable Barbara J. Peterson Mayor, City of Orono Box 164 Crystal Bay, NN 55323 Dear Mayor Peterson: SHORELAND GRANT AGREEMENT Enclosed is the original and 3 ''opies of your Shorelard Grant Agreement. If the Agreement is acceptable please sign all four copies and return them to Pam Albrecnt at the above address. It will take approximac.^ly one month to secure all the necessary signatures and to encumber the f’.nds. When the Agreement has been fully executed, a copy vill be sent to you. All billings should be submitced for approval to: Ed Pick, Shoreland Hydrologist DNR - Div. of Waters 1200 Warn**’* Road St. Pau' N 55106 (612) 77. >16 If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Mr. F’. ck. Sincerely, DIVISION OF WATERS 1 Paul T. Swenson, Acting Administrator Permits and Land Use Section PTS/PO:pa Enclosure cc: Senator Gen Olson Representative Steve Smith Shoreland Hydrologist Ed Fick AN equal opportunity EMPLOYER jLhA........ V- r I I 1^ ife, STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SHORELAND GRANT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered L by the State of Minnesota, acting by and through the Commissioner of Natural Resources, hereinafter referred to as the "State", and the City of Orono, hereinafti to as the "City". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the State has been granted certain responsibility for regulat: Dn of shoreland development, as provided by Minnesota Statutes 103F.201-221 and Minnesota Rules parts 6120.2500 through 6120.3900 pertaining to "Statewide Standards for Management of Shoreland Areas"; and WHEREAS, the State is authorized by the Laws of 1991, Chapter 254 lection 5. SubdL 3 to provide grant assistance for local governments to adopt a shoreland management o.'linance consistent with these statewide standards; aiul WHEREAS, the City has submitted an application for grant assistance. NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed by and betv. een the parties hereto: I.WORK A. Local Government Responsibility 1. Shoreland Ordinance Adoption After the official two year notice has been given, per Minnesota Rul'^s part 6120.2800, subpart 2 , and before February 5, 1992, the City agiees to adopt a shoreland management ordinance consistent v,ith statewide standards. i i p. I: f. ¥ i r U 2. Ordinance Certification Checklist. Within the adoption schedule described in 1, above, the City agrees to complete all the tasks and return the attached Ordinance Certification Checklist to the State. This checklist and all documents required therein must be received before final payment will be authorized. 3. Provide to the Department for review a draft ordinance at least 60 days before the deadline date defined in item 1. above. 4. Documentation of Actual Costs. The City agrees to provide to the State documentation of all actual eligible costs, defined below, in the adoption of a shoreland ordinance for the City. Examples of allowable costs are: a. Publishing costs for hearing notices and ordinance provisions; b. Consultants fees and/or legal fees involved in the ordinance adoption process; c. Mailing costs as.sf.»ciated with ordinance adoption and publication; d. Education and t lining costs including expenses for attending the DNR workshops; e. Costs of holding public information meetings; f. Costs of shoreland classification reviews, including map revisions and ordinance development; g. Costs for comprehensive plan development and revisions perttiining to the shoreland district onlv, unless combined with the Flood Plain and/or Wild and Scenic Rivers programs. h. Costs for upgrading zoning administration forms such as: permit application, permit certification, variances, conditional uses, special uses, zoning changes, and amendments. K fe- ■ i - ' V'- •r W' ,lv I-I*. pv;i feSwm-wsy i. Costs resulting from tasks performed by local appointed officials. employees or staff involved in the adoption process of a shoreiand ordinance. j. Office computerization relating to shoreiand management, 5. The City shall return to the State any grant funds advanced which are in excess of 50% of actual costs. 6. If the City does not adopt a shoreiand ordinance by February 5,1992, then all grant funds for the purposes of adopting a shoreiand ordinance shall be returned to the State. n. GRANT The State shall pay to the City 50% of all reasonable expenses for the services authorized hereunder or $5,000.00, whichever is less, for the Work. The City agrees to assume a 50% share of all reasonable expenses actually paid for the services authorized hereunder, which share may be paid in money or in the form of services provided by the City. The City agrees to pay all expenses not paid for by the grant. All hilHntm shall first be sent to Shoreiand Hydrologist Ed Fick, DNR - Div. of Waters, 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106 for approval and processing. Invoices will be submitted for double the requested payment amount to demonstrate both the local and state share. Finai payment will be made after the Work has been completed and if costs and Work for which invoices are submitted are satisfhctoiy to the Commissioner of Natural Resources. This also includes submittal of the Ordinance Certification Checklist. Advance payments to the City by the State )t to exceed 50% of the grant amount may be authorized if a listing of anticipated incurred expenses are submitted by the City to the State. 5? ' fc'-• [^^- ’--: L f/. K--.' ■ M/ . ■r^ >* . III. SPECIAL PROVISIONS 1. The City agrees that in the hiring of common or skilled labor for the performance of any work under any contract, or sub contract hereunder, neither it nor any contractor, material supplier or vendor shall engage in any discriminatory employment practices as such practices are defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 181.69 and Chapter 363, or in any practices prohibited by Minnesota Statutes Sections 177.42 and 177.43 (1988). 2. The City shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless the State, its agents and employees from all claims or actions which may arise from performance of this Agreement. 3. The books, records, documents and accounting procedures, and practices of the City relevant to this Agreement shall be subject to examination of the Department of Natural Resources and the Legislative Auditor. IV. TERM This Agreement shall become effective when all signatures required have been obtained and when the funds have been encumbered by the Commissioner of Finance, and shall continue in effect untJ the agreed tasks are completed or until Februaiy 6,1992, whichever is earlier. V. TERMINATION The State may terminate this Agreement "with cause ”. "With cause" shall mean that the City is not performing the Work in accordance with the terms of the Agreement or the Work is not being performed to the satisfaction of the State. If this Agreement is so terminated, the State shall only be liable to pay for 50% of the Work found acceptable. ri'T- ■ j-.^ . In the event of termination of this Agreement as heretofore provided, the City shall have seven (7) days prior written notice and if the Agreement is being terminated "with cause" the City shall have until the date of termination to show cause why the Agreement should not be terminated. If it is determined by the State that the City’s default was beyond its control or it was not otherwise in default, the ■.Ci ■ Agreement shall not be terminated. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement. r CITY OF ORONO •- #■ % BY: lii pt- pi'-’terr fte? •|r % Mfl^or DATE;_ BY:____ City Clerk DATE:_____ STATE AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT BY:--------------------------------— TITLE:. DATE:. Ilf' Iffl- -rrP' '■ fc'V, As to form and execution by the ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: TITLE:. DATE: COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION BY: ______________________ DATE: ENCUMBERED DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE BY: DATE: Av- • r- w t- € II:.11'^ mi !^CI. ■ 1 IviV'.;. fc’':*' ir;'.; ih-: mtm:' W^vm ■*'v:'K: > :mv -mi'- mto: [[S' #'■ ii/i-: ;;f,r:-. P;.:b PF r:- ■H:'A- ORDINANCE CERTIFICATION CHECKLIST Once all the below listed tasks are completed, please sign and return the checklist and all required documents to the State. This must be returned before fmal payment will be authorized. 1.Date of published hearing notice. 2.Date of postmark of hearing notice to Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources/Area Hydrologist. 3.Date of hearing(s). 4. 6. Date of ordinance adoption. If ordinance is published in entirety, date and affidavit of newspaper publication of adopted ordinance, include three copies of ordinance) 6.If only ordinance summary published, date and affidavit of newspaper "blication of ordinance title and summary along with certified copy of adopted ordinance in its entirety from the Clerk. (Include three copies of ordinance) 7.Date of official filing of adopted ordinance with County Recorder (______record book number page number). 8.Board of Adjustment/Appeals has been established. •Note: Cities under charter must also submit a list of any additional reviuirements for hearings, notices, etc. stated in their charter. Please specify: BY: Mayor DATE:_ CITY:__ r.” ‘■w,- »-v- > ^ /O TO: \ John R. Gerhardson, Acting City Administratoi FROM:Dorothy Hallin, City Clerk DATB:August S, 1991 SUBJECT: Contract - City Recorder ATTACHMENT: A. Agreement and Contract for City Recorder Services ISSUE - Determine if Council desires to sign a written contract with" the City Recorder. INTRODUCTION - At the July 22, 1991 Council meeting Council approveTTHi”employment of Teri Naab as the City Recorder. DISCUSSION - Teri has submitted Attachment A, for approval by^the Cbuncm ^As noted in this contract under #3 the cost to the City will be $100.00 per meeting from August 1991 to July 31, 1992. Subsequent to July 31, 1992 the charge will be $115.00 per meeting. #5 requires notification of meeting cancellation 2 hours prior to a scheduled meeting time or the full rate will be charged. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended this agreement between the City and Recorder be accepted. In the past there has been no signed contract and it is recommended that this practice be established at this time for the benefit of both parties. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, Council approves signing of Attachment A, a contract between the City of Orono and the City Recorder. Ayes _, Nays _. TO:Mayor and City Council FROM:John R. Gerhardson, Acting City Administrator Forwarded recommending approval. W' iFI AGRBEMBNT & CONTRACT FOR CITY RECORDER SERVICES This agreement is made and entered into this 22nd day of JulYr 1991 by and between the City of Orono, Minnesota and Theresa L. Maab. I, Theresa Naab, agree to provide City Recorder services subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. I will attend all Park Commission# Planning Commission and Council meetings, record and type up the minutes and return to staff for review; 2. I will attend any special meetings I may be asked to attend for the purpose of recording minutes; 3, The City will pay $100,00 for each meeting attended for the first year starting August 1991; thereafter increase the previous years amount by 15%; 4. In the event I am unable to attend a meeting, the City f^ill supply a substitute. At their discretion, either the substitute or I will type up the minutes. If I do type up the minutes, the fee will be prorated, based on hours of meeting ; 5. In the event that a meeting is canceled less than 2 hours prior to the meeting because of lack of quorum, weather, etc., the full rate shall be charged for attendance. 6. This contract shall rem?’n in effect u*^til a 30 day written notice is given by f her p<»*"ty t's^'^iinating said contract• 1991. This agreement h»>& been executed on the day of Theresa L. Maab Barbarba Peterson, Mayor 'V . <5i ^'v- I :;>. .. r fe- L^V-:' ^'4^' !■r v^:-' V'-:/. V \ MINUTES OF LAKE USE COMMITTEE MEETING JUNE 4, 1991 % ‘ffc A ineBlilng of t.ho Lake Use Committee was held pursuant to notice at the Lafayette Club, Lake Minnetonka, at 8:00 a.m., Tuesday, June 4, 1991. All members of the Committee were present. Also present was Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator. The minutes of the first meeting of the Committee were approved. A draft proposal was circulated describing the purposes of the Committee. Some changes in language were suggested by JoEllen Herr. And, it was determined that the draft would be rewritten and submitted for approval at a later meeting. A discussion took place for the benefit of the new members from the Planning Commission of the background of the Committee and the general problems which were currently before it. After further discussion, and because the City was awaiting a new draft of the proposed LMCD long-range management plan (or portions thereof) so that particular matter was temporarily in Abeyance, it was decided that the Committee would focus upon a study of the DNR Shoreland Regulations as they relate to Orono's comprehensive plan and specific zoning regulations. And, it was further decided to have the members of the staff, specifically Mike Gaffron and Jeanne Mabusth, bring the Committee up to date on their work in this area. The next meeting of the Committee was set for June 18 at the Lafayette Club, and the City Administrator was requested to see that proper notice was given. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. 2645X ifrflMrrir'tiiTMi k l&'‘ •1 r^-.. I,'- ' >T■t.r k ^.: fJ: rl:‘ U- «•• |V ’r&r Ml MINUTES OF LAKE USE COMMITTEE MEETING JUNE 18, 1991 A meeting of the Lake Use Committee of the City of Orono was held pursuant to notice at 8:00 a.m., Tuesday, June 18, 1991, at the Lafayette Club at Lake Minnetonka. All members of the Conunittee were present, except Diane Goetten. Also present were Mark Bemhardson, Jeanne Mabusth, and Mike Gaffron from the City staff, and John Shardlow. The minutes of the first meeting of the Lake Use Committee were approved as submitted. The document setting forth the purposes and function of the Lake Use Committee was approved in the form attached hereto. Mike Gaffron then supplied the members of the Committee with a copy of the proposed DNR Shoreland Regulations containing preliminary comments and notations resulting from the attempts of the staff to determine the differences between the Orono regulations and the DNR regulations and also the similarities between them. Mr. Gaffron gave a preliminary overview of the DNR regulations and suggested one or two of the major problem areas which the Committee will need to focus on. The Committee determined that it would be necessary to consider the draft of the DNR regulations in detail and article by article. It further determined that it was desirable for the Committee and the City to reach conclusions as to the form of regulations which the City would prefer to adopt, if possible, before discussing with the DNR what changes, if any, that the organization would be willing to accept, in this connection, it was decided that commencing with Section 4 of the DNR regulations relating to classification of lakes and streams would be most productive, and that the next meeting of the Committee should be devoted primarily to that end. The next meeting of the Committee was tentatively set for 7j30 in the evening, Thursday, June 27th, at the City Council chambers. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. 2648X —«- h HA' F^ii ’ %: i:>'v ’'•■ I ■vv 1“ 1:'^ t- f» l:*^-!./.* I'' y. , sjy ;.4. ■'■'■ F ’ r.»^- i.v C*;r'- > ¥■■ PURPOSES The purpose and function of the Lake Use Conunittee is to focus upon the activities of Orono as they relate to Lake Minnetonka, in particular, and other lakes and wetlands within its boundaries with particular emphasis upon these bodies of water and their environs as natural resources of the City. The Committee will advise the Council upon, or itself propose to the Council, actions aimed at: 1) conserving and improving where possible the environmental quality of The Lake; 2) preventing pollution of The Lake of all kinds, including non-surface pollution such as milfoil, the presence of excessive nutrients, etc.; 3) ensuring safe and reasonable use of The Lake; 4) preventing unreasonable and excessive impact upon the shoreland and further degradation of the quality of lake use and user experience In particular, at the present, the Conunittee expects to be i^0Yie%fing: 1) the proposed LMCD Long Range Management Plan; 2) the DNR Shoreland Regulations as they relate to Orono's comprehensive plan and specific zoning regulations; 3) marina licensing; and 4) regulation of marinas within Orono. 2642X A » • •«. ..V i •I-y-i* rOiO iiiWO<« '5^ >• ' -« _ *4~»^:.v fa%pj<dg^^ 1 :,^- ru>» *> ->^ ^ ..: . 1 .'.4— ■ ft)-.'» N^‘v■ i. •*-•■:. ' • ‘ -i* i Si' r '. '->'i f f -~1' i V-»»«riisaa »W i’ rih-V*ar.A k' .o..:ilLS M:VA'- t.vV:' mi... tT-: gc^mm r :?-> ■*' ». f*ris igfiSS • ^,. ."J^ -... .'.... >:n-ji^w, Wr^a^S^!^ " :r-% •>.. r •P^ 1^ r^ u* •■ n:- >. • ,.t ‘ ^ e t^**. -r - -I/' • t^* ■ «'«Ww -•#«» »*<A» «•» *• 4«ll^( ■* i* 7, 9>f * »• j .•-»*-^ t •»*- »<r • I* ■ ^ •■ •_• '_■. .;r. ‘..a .■ -• • •■ -—' - v - ■- - •' t-.v.J ;. *. • ^ • i- *; •kli'v' -<-*• • •« « w - • • * ' . . • .u -VT-V’ ^ s’ —-».-•-*• • r. ,. .• *,* -• , .' . -I, - ..w -^* . '% •>*r ^ ^ !»• \ < «W J*;i,:^:rr-.'..r:::r:;t- . ^^--;^,„ - .- •• v ;*« r; .•rVse/i 15 ■\'Cp-2_v / -V ^ — “liLr V-5^ ■ ‘•^'^ _.tT v-‘ • ' •'•*‘ -fc ;.^j . V3?*II. o<-.. -j:;-v -: .r ". *»»• '^^mrn V "}. » --/»’- f. 5’,A 6^>^v-- ■ ^ '-r' *'' 'ii'^fcaS £2;^" j ^'j^bHK iMP p^^r. •-• r-'-^ •■ '^Sm *' ^ ^ ^ » * -v«* *«^ ■ * '« , .. ... ^4 4.-^ F>yr^« .-r •--** ..4..V rt- ^*-*. — V' 7- .' ■ -■ •? X' *' f " •» i v% 4 f-■£5-' % ?-n‘ t ■ ■^ > • ■ 'V. ' - s •* '• 'r'T&^ ^ r *- V V ^ > <*^-.’»-c . ' . "^ ' -5 • T *"*'i ^ -> , ' ^,'-T '. ... J. ■?" V; • y-^^Z f.‘jTrr^. - ‘* ^ ^ —. -r . t'r . r' - .'-/-s* Vf''. w -'V* ^•t’ cinAj;ttzCn'ivi"- 'V-.D'*'^.'5- M"‘ •r/?•/►' W.;.. '■^ . l‘> fs &*■'>\» I;?' L* '• iS'. '3:: ‘ t ' ■ -•.. #■' [V^'-.y; W>V ' 'V ?■ ■V‘V 'I ll-Vm^.fSAmfi f • *. rv ^>-:-^.1. , I^.'t i- i'5'S' |:- lkf.'■,■^ ■i*. M- ?'Nfr'>y; Jy,-!^tS'‘A •^'■' ;» 'fel,:: •-■ ^ i?*ifc INNOVATIVE MICROGRAPHICS DUE TO THE POOR CONDITION OF THE PRECEEDING DOCUMENT WE CANNOT PRODUCE AN ACCEPTABLE MICROFILM IMAGE, v5f4&,.^. J u MINUTES OP LAKE USE COMMITTEE MEETING OP JULY 29, 1991 A meeting of the Lake Use Committee of the City of Orono was held pursuant to notice at 7:00 p«m*r Monday, July 29, 1991, at the Orono Council Chambers. All Members of the Committee were present. Also present were Michael Gaffron, John Shardlow and Jeanne Mabusth. The minutes of the June 4th and June 18th meetings were presented for approval. Members were asked to review so that they could formally be approved at the next regular meeting of the Committee. The Committee unanimously appointed J. Diann Goetten as Vice-Chairperson and Jeanne Mabusth as Secretary. Chairman Callahan commented on the amended long-range development plan of the LMCD noting that the amended plan was more comprehensive and workable and that the Committee was now working on a recreational part of the plan. The Committee continued to review Chapter 4 of the DNR Shoreland Regulations model ordinances dealing with the classification of lakes. The ordinary high water mark of Lakes Classen, Lydiard, French and Katrina have not been determined. It will be necessary to determine the OHM of these lakes as part of the study for this ordinance amendment. Staff was to contact the DNR to determine if the DNR was to make these determinations or was it to be the responsibility of individual cities. In considering the special protection districts defined as the area located within 1,000 feet of the OHM of lakes and 300 feet on either side of specific tributaries, members questxoned the impact of highways and railroads on these protected zones. Chairman Callahan specifically questioned the impact of the Burlington Railroad and Highway 12 on the 1,000* setback zone from the south shoreline of Long Lake, It was agreed that gpmclfic criteria must be developed to distinguish between this type of barrier and other areas within protected zones intersected by railroads and major thoroughfares. The Committee agreed with the classification of lakes as designated by the Department of Natural Resources. The DNR listed three protected tributaries within the City. Staff has recommended that three other tributaries be added to the protected listing. The Committee advised staff to proceed with a formal recommendation to the Committee. It was also noted that the 300* shoreline zone is intended to be expanded to the actual floodplain width where the floodplain extends more than 300* from the channel. In consideration of the impact of the shoreland regulations upon potential development, the Committee recommended that an interim ordinance be prepared for formal action by the Council and to place the appropriate legal notice in the official paper of the City. If' il'. I ' !.:•• • tc-A ;)'■ ’ I ■■ c 'r i v^’ i~ V • 1 ■ ■:■ f •• . 11- LAKE OSB COMMITTEE MEETING OP JULY 29, 1991 The next meeting of the Committee was set- for August 13, V.-"* •?hrL?“n%'^"dfir4V/at«? "/ch\"’ler1.a\°dl*ol^"wal re<|uest.ed to see that proper notice was given. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned I -I /i' .if k^f- i” |vM'n^' ",^■■:. •iV‘/ f »t' ?i;: V ■ m .V >r' m:■ fi.- |- >\‘ l^vu-v a -'iV fv ?-■Vi.'-A r >; .> •• - r • - . * ■ :V' ■ :' myhrjr. M-y r^v M-../ i'" Ikf ■ ft7-- '■ TO: FROM: DATS: Mayor and City Council John R. Gerhardson, Acting City Administrator August 8/ 1991 %> 4'% % SUBJECT: Disciplinary Action - Temporary Employee At the special meeting of the Orono Council on July 23/ 1991 Council approved disciplinary action as recommended by staff with direction to confirm this same action at the next regular Council meeting. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , sconded by to confirm the disciplinary action of July 23, 1991, as recommended by staff, of Eric Bowman, temporary parks helper. Ayes _, Nays _. :," ‘ - i. ®'. v^= .^• i^..tm% fKWfe' fc k ^. i r-L^V-'vl^c-' i V Vv '-- m: Qi'- r- WB Hii'.fv' % TO:Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator DATE: July 26, 1991 SUBJECT: Police Chief Employment % Attachment: A. Letter of Agreement Dated 7/24/91 - Sathe & Associates ISSUE - Acknowledgement of agreement regarding the employment of Steven Sullivan as the Orono Police Chief. INTRODUCTION - Attached is a copy of the letter that is agreeable to Mr. Sullivan which outline the conditions for the employment. ALTERNATIVES 1. Accept. 2. Amend and accept. 3. Table. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that this be adopted as presented and that the only amendment be that the physical be with the City of Otono's physician rather than his personal physician. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by that Counci 1 accept Attachment A as the terms of agreement for employee Steven Sullivan as the City's Police Chief subject to the amendment noted above. Ayes , Nays cc:Sathe and Associates Steven Sullivan ii. I r- F- Sillhc & Associates. Inc I t I C . r A i’ • ,’ A *J ' . July 24. 1991 Mr. Steven X. Sullivan 3913 Monterey Ave. S. St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Dear Steve: Sy*CoulV^ "jhe" I believe you can look forwar J to a good working relationship with **'® the City of Orono. Start Date:You will begin work with the City of Orono on Monday, August 19th. The City understands that you have made a commitment to work the State Fair from August 22nd through Labor Day. It is understood that your commitment to the State Fair w il only take you away from the job during non-normal working hours. As I understand it you will be working from 5:00 P.M. to approximately 1:00 A.M. at the State Fair. In addition, the City is not concerned at the present time about your working at the Metropolitan Transit Commission, however, they feel that should a conflict result between that position and your position with Orono, that your position with Orono would take priority. Tcrni and Conditions:You will report to the City Administrator. During your initial working period you will probably be expected to attend some Orono Council meetings and to make several contacts with the contracting Cities. Thereafter, it is expected that your contact with the respective City Councils would be minimal, however, the issues of compensation time and hours of work are to be established between you and the Acting City Administrator or the new City Administrator, when that person comes on board. Salary:You will begin at an annual compensation of S49.000. You will be provided a performance evaluation at the end of six months, or no later than February I, 1992. Subject to a satisfactory performance review, you will receive an increase in salary similar to that granted other City employees, effective January 1, 1992. Thereafter, you will receive annual performance reviews in August every year and your salary will be adjusted at the same time as salaries are adjusted for other City employees. Insurance:The City currently offers three HMO medical plans and, at the present time, pays $231 per month towards individual I nirvjF ni park . snpi rFO/\n l AKF HOao . MiriNFAPril .S MIHNFSOTA SM.fi • 6.2/546 2.0) • fax 6.2/66930 I aW^it^ I tif I? & if h- m P-- '3. If y- if ts;'-. E ffte S:'f fe:P' rr- p- f#:. i: ■ .r-r-- «■ pf P:te'j. Iff: ' Transportation: Vacations, Holidays, Sick Leave: Pension Defe^'^^sd Compensation: Conferences, Training, Education: Physical: and family coverage. Your contribution for family coverage will depend on the plan that you select. As part of this plan the City provides $5,000 life insurance. You have the option to purchase additional life insurance subject to policy limitations. You will be provided an automobile by the City for use during normal business hours and for normal City business. You will also be allowed to use the automobile for transportation to and from your residence to work in the City of Orono. Upon date of employment, you will be allowed to accumulate at the annual three week level, that is, one and one quarter days per month to a maximum of three weeks. It is understood that you not take vacation during the first four to six months of employment. You will be granted the normal schedule of holidays as provided to all other City employees. Upon arriving at the City you will receive a 30 day sick leave bank and you will accumulate one day per month against the 30 day bank. Thereafter, you will continue to accumulate one day per month up to the maximum allowed within City policy, which is currently 960 hours. You will continue your participation in the Minnesota Public Employees ’ Retirement Association. The City has available the ICMARC Deferred Compensation Plan and you are eligible to participate in that plan. Per the budget process, the City provides for attendance at the International Association of Chiefs of Police Conference and the State Chiefs Conference. Other seminars, programs, educational leaves, etc. will be part of the budget process and subject to review by the City Administrator and Council approval. The City asks that you have your physician complete a physical and report the results to the Acting City Administrator. The expense of the physical will be borne by the City. beneficial one to all. Very truly yours. ‘f' Jim Brimeyer cc: Mark Bernardson Wr r-'•i , /V fk- 72591.4^-0-’ TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor Peterson and CounciImembers John R. Gethardson, Public Works Directo July 24, 1991 \ SUBJECT: Temporary Employment Counter Helper - Orono Golf Course On July 22, 1991, temporary counter helper Robert Brown submitted his resignation effective July 26, 1991. We have received an application of employment from William McIntyre to fill the position for the remainder of the 1991 golfing season. RECOMMENDATION -* To approve the employment of William McIntyre as temporary counter helper at the Orono golf course at an hourly rate of $5.00 per hour effective July 24, 1991. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _ to approve the employment of William McIntyre as temporary counter helper at the Orono golf course at an hourly rate of $5.00 per hour effective July 24, 1991. Ayes __, nays __. To: Proa: Date: Subject: Mayor Peterson & O '^uncil Member % John R. Gerhardson, Acting City Administrator August 2f 1991 Temporary Employment - Golf Course '^ifv % Each year the City of Orono participates in a state funded program called Twin Cities Tree Trust. The agency provides and funds youth from the area for job programs at government agencies. The Tree Trust employee working at the golf course as a greenskeeper helper has found other work and is leaving on July 30, 1991. The Tree Trust organization has been unable to provide persons to fill the position, therefore we will have to hire and fund the replacement. We have received an application from Jane Delaney, 1315 Hoodhill Avenue, who is interested in filling the position. KecoBBendation To employ Jane Delaney as temporary groundskeeper helper for the balance of the golfing season at an hourly rate of $5.00 effective August 1, 1991. Proposed Motion Moved 2nd to approve Jane Delaney as temporary groundskeeper helper at the Orono Gof Course for the balance of the 1991 golfi..g season at an hourly rate of $5.00 effective August 1, 1991. -jv u- -r A h. pi e:'V l£ f?. It.': ■ ■ ■u ■j!' ■ ttt I. f ■ P §:■ iv I-■' Krf.- fe-I gat>- & V ■ .mte.. TOS Proa: Dates Subject: Mayor Peterson & Council Members John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director July 22, 1991 Equipment Purchase - Public Works ■1^. ^ r> % For 1991 the Public Works Department budgeted for the purchase of an underbody plow for one of the dump trucks. Becau e this is an "add on", only ore vendor chose to offer a quote for the installation. ■BCOMNBHDATION - To purchase one underbody plow installed from Crystal Manufacturing Company for an amount of $5,220.00. PROPOSED NOTION - Moved by , seconded by ___, to approve the purchase of one underbody plow installed from Crystal Manufacturing Cwnpany for an amount of $5,220.00. Ayes , nays JRG/tln w I'' t '■ ■•/:'■■ m;•> iif I ■ .'^ ■ -rA' Itte X L. TO: FROH: Mayor and City Council John R. Gerhardson, Acting City Administrator ry DATE:August 8, 1991 SUBJECT: Sewer Pond Elevation Recently there has been discussion regarding the establishment of a water level of the settling pond at the old sewer treatment plant adjacent to French Lake. The issue involves applying for a permit from the Department of Natural Resources and when last discussed by Council that matter was referred to the Park Commission. The Park Commission has reviewed the matter and is in agreement that the water elevation level should be that which is recommended by the DNR. RECOMMENDATION - To direct staff to apply for a permit from the DNR to establish the elevation of water for the pond at the Orono Sewer Treatment Plant site. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by to direct staff to apply for a permit from the DNR to establish the water elevation of the pond at the Orono Sewer Treatment Plant site. Ayes __, Nays r TO:Mayor Peterson and City Council Acting City Administrator Gerhardson % Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrate Date: Subject August If 1991 985 Tonkawa Road - Owner seeks resolution of City confirming no violations within lakeshore protectea , area.■ The current owner of the property, Gabriel Jabbour, has asked that the City pass a resolution confirming that all previously reported violations within the 0-75* setback area be confirmed as removed. The violations resulted from actions of an earlier owner, Richard Mast, who proceeded to remove trees greater than 6" in diameter within the 0-75' setback area. Mr. Jabbour purchased the property in 1988 and has worked with staff to relandscape the lakeshore yard. With the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy on December 4, 1989, the City found all previous violations had been removed. The enclosed resolution has been drafted reconfirming the above findings. The resolution will be filed against the chain of title at the Title Company's request. n?. . ^ M* V- ^v-. i ' :•: ■> ■ r‘‘t' 'v; '«• -:i/ C-V tN ^■r f'- lis> Jl 1 1; .*■ f|. :<.' .\ ! • .■ jf- A RBSOLOTION RBAFPIRMING HO VIOLATIOHS WITHIN THE 0>75* LAKB8BORB PROTECTED AREA AT THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 2, BLOCK 1» PARWOOD, HENNEPIH COONTY, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, Gabriel Jabbour (hereinafter "Owner") is the owner of the property located at 985 Tonlcawa Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as Lot 2, Block Ir Parwood, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter ■property") t and WHEREAS, the owner has requested a formal resolution of the City reaffirming that all previously recorded violations within the 0—75' lakeshore protected area have been removed and sati8factorily resolved. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. On December 14, 1987, the former owner, Richard Mast, had contracted with a landscape company to remove approximately 8 trees with trunks in excess of 6" in diameter. 2. Orono's Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 3 Tree Removal Regulations - requires a permit from the City for the removal of all live trees within 75' of the shoreline with a diameter of 6" or more. 3. Neither the former owner, Mr. Richard Mast, nor the landscape contractor obtained the necessary permits for the removal of such trees. Dale A. Gustafson, a landscape architect, confirmed that at least 4 of the trees were dead and the remaining were potential safety hazards. 4. On July 20, 1988, the current owner, in a letter dated July 20, 1986, agreed to a landscape improvement plan within the 0-75* area involving: a. immediate erosion control steps for disturbed area; b. replanting of 4 trees within the lakeshore protected area. Page 1 of 2 * . V- •it 5. On December A, 1989 the City issued a Certificate of Occupancy for the new residence reconfirming that the conditions of the proposed landscape plan had been satisfied. CONCLUSIONS Based upon oae or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby reaffirms that all previously reported violations against the property legally described above and located at 985 Tonkawa Road have been removed and satisfactorily resolved. Adopted by the Orono City Council of this 12th day of August, 1991. ATTEST: Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Dorothy M. Rallin, City Clerk STATE OP MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of August, 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson 6 Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor t City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public "age 2 of 2 m^m^- ’fc^.jr tUn— Imilii ^aQroCOnw r- f' *► ^ *” ;^ilOaetBai66 [Q)lialBqr,Miiia.SS3Z3 .» r rv->• -^* ^^•pwpoMof tbto letter is toconTinn io writing the steps agreed upon at our meeu'ng |npi^ d» 0>7S ft tree removil at 98S Tookawa Rd. TtoowOl be haf tMies placed immedutely at a parucular area where poauble ruiKifrafkl troitaicPMid occur. Ic^ Bi Fm of the Anal grating plans at the site will encompass the replantiiif of 4 trees within the ^TSfcbcacifaacfc. ^^dllltctothao k3fou aad Tom for taking the time to handle thu matter. If either of you have any IvAar ooMonaiapntlag this jwoperty, please feel free to conuct me at 379>2321..;. i .'ki'lr Cf _ ri; KnUcMMan1% ■ ■■ ‘ >• V" ' * .7 - • i • •i'-- T*' i ?v< \<7f Si 11"";' ■L,' t .••* '■ M . • ■ ^•“;* :' V- . ^Kv,' ■ ''I . ij S/ ‘^?r. t- TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council John R. Gerhardson, Acting City Administrator August 7, 1991 % O/, ^ ^ V SDBJBCT: Administrator's Information WATER wtJALITY REPORT - SU MMIT PARK & CASCO POINT BEACHES attache(i letter. - See CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S GOALS - See attachment. PENHOLT RETIREMENT - See attachment. :x. F i •r t 4 • •r.* •*, . t : i « I • # I . -1 I» » I •‘I. . > 4^.AOfNCY a OOlM«Mt/lOi ML IMMi □ rtCAL CCXJ> «0P Ml I iHWVIUI OMiyi«MO/iu--------------------- AOS AC P ITRiR AMT ML L twytto*00a AC P ITFtp MIT ML NMM i«MH AO M t«Hll 4BMR |«mA MMR 24 HR AO ■ ~f -*001 —•-------• 1^-r~H —001 —___I-----/ 10 m —r 001 ——I —/ 1.0 - —-f —f 4-001 —— II / IS ■+'—t —001 ------^------- ai —/ ai —n ai —/ ai —Z' ai ——— V i-l « ' l:HO'Svr f/io OATt:ANALYST • >ki * I ( i \ I lUiiiiMpottt Htilth DtpartmMi Buraau of UboratortM UUKMIATOflY EXAMINATION OF WATER (NON-POTABLE) Hi .r-! I r: i t ; i J Jr. fxejuJ-m^m AOiNCT •7-^ 5w ftf Aj^KAl OOU/iOi ML I HBOUaBfMP OffCALim»/i«IA.AiP»0 -----------------^ _____________ AMT ML LTSvrmi oos AC.P iTWF AMT ML LTmrroM ACS AC P fTWR IjO •-------t —SOI —- IS —t 001 —/ l.f —•-------+•L O01 ——* IS f ^ O01 —— IS —+“1-001 -------—— 01 —^-----^ —f oi / OI —y Of —/i OI --------—/ ;; :\N Ho-3»ni0«.«/so OATS:ANALYST • «JL. •\ I..•i•I A • • •*» h\* ;•: \ - i ' r . k. WnoMpolt HiiWh Otpartmanl Bursau el Labonloflet LAMNMTOHY EXAMNATION OF WATER (NON-POTABLE)wm. • ‘-r •* • ; *• • lij f» L k fe' J i • •• COlAJOfSD MMMII ^no rw AMT ML LTiivms OOO AC P tfw LTIiMTM AOS AC P t1 Miii mm ft Ml 4iMI •AMI AO m •AMI mm HMI MMI •AMI m 1 m IS ■h ~+001 —-------—/ IS ih t —001 —/ IS r -----O01 -------—/ IS t —0S1 —--/ IS t'—f opt OI —• 01 — 01 —f — 01 -f — OI ——--/ •r Mix. n«L«/M MtK 7*^^-A / «MM.vfTt \[.(cXjJLl K\ t. . - • I F'». I i*. ■r U - .« . • V , '■Url r:y\. ;• ‘ ■ ,t HENNEPIN an 0? c: -0COMMUNITY HEALTH DEPARTMENT M _____ ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH MANAGEMENT GROqP'. 33' Suit© 215 1011 South First Street Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-9413 AoG ^ Telephone: (612) 935-1544 fax 612 931-9509 — - ' July 30, 1991 John Gorhardson Orono Diraetor of Public Works P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Daar Diraetor: On July 26, 1991 water samples were taken from your beaches at SuT^mit Park and Casco Point. The recoTninended water quality at«...Tdards for the State of Minnesota are: A.The fecal coliform density from the last five successive sets of samples collected on five different days shall not exceed a geometric mean of 200 per 100 ml. When the fecal coliform density of any sample collected exceeds 1,000 per 100 ml. consideration should be given to closing the bathing beach, and daily samples shall imaiediately be collected and analyzed for fecal coliform for at least two consecutive days. B.Mote. It is also recommended that analysis be made for fecal streptococcus and staphylococcus to aid in identifying the source of contamination. If there is evidence of complaints of eye, ear, nose or throat irritations, analysis should be made for pseudomonas aeruginosa, it is also desireable to review the sanitary survey. According to these standards, your beaches appear to have good water quality and are safe for public swimming, as can be seen from the enclosed results. If you have any questions, please, feel free to call our office at 935-1544. Sincerely, — rennifer Wheat Community Health Worker Snolosures HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer "^v :iP'-' •-* ■■"' ■ K--'il«' ■ il^r-m-^rfe- aa?;'.-’ ®', ■ ■ ■-. ... •- ;'«<: a»L SOTTING •t7 STO *08 810 *09 810 *98 STO *91 STO 1987 Short 1980 Short 1909 Short • 1998 Shore Objective Ql^ective Objective Objective Objective (Priority) CITY OP OROHD Draft 85/28/91 tevieed 86/28/91 87/26/91 IMK E. BBMMDSON CITY MHIMISTRATOR I MY 1991 - 38 M9UL 1992 MEK GOAL AREA OBJECTIVE DATES STATUS 1. OOmUNlTY OeVELOPHEKT •91 STO (C)A« Highiay 12 1. utilities Sewer - Part l(Detemiine Route Order Plans and Specs Bid Construct 09/01/91 09/01/91 10/15/91 Water System Main Well Installation 4/91-7/91 Operational 5/21/91 6/91 Switch over interim well to Otten Tower (9*12 months) Plans Specs Location Decision Order Assessments (Sewer Pt II Plus Well 6 Tcswer) Authorized awaiting location decision 06/01/91 7/23/91 - Location selected CUP to 8/91 PC Negotiation on Utilities (txjng Lake - Medina) Cowmenced water discussion 10/25/69 with Medina - Madina to meet %rith affected residents 1/90 to discuss (Potential new subdivision in Medina may have an lapact on project.) .. . .i. r r i f c c c r ( 1 % '•r. -f; _- AREA GOAL AREA OBJECTIVE DATES STATUS K CXmJNITY DEVCLOPM£»ir Continiied '88 STO 2. Long Term Corridor Upgrade Scoping Process•89 STO •98 STO •91 STO (A) 12/91 6/'91 Round meetings reduced nxnber of corridors from 5 to 3 7/22/91 SRF engaged as transportation consultant Qiviromental Inpact Study 86/92 Take appropriate planning steps if needed in potential corridors 01/92 98 STO 3. 1992 Safety Inproveroent Final Review 10/30/91 Determine financing of Orono share of improvements 03/92 Vtork with mXTT on right-of-wy/frootage roads Get funding from MnOOT for frontage roads as trade off for control access/right of %#ay 83/92 Right of way act^istion/tinoOT Construction 92 1993 c i.. m '•"XA , ..>:C gp:, , V v>; k. AREA GOAL AREA 1. ommm developmekt continued *88 STO •89 STO B. Navarre Redevelopient •99 STO Ce Ccmnunity Transportation Plan •99 STO •9i STO (B) •87 STO •88 STO •89 STO D. Storm Mater fianagcront Plan 91 STO (B) B' OBJECTIVE DATES Determine beautification plan iitplanentation if any for 1992 10/91 Determine Interest in Christinas lighting 08/91 Acquire if appropriate Delivery - No earlier than 09/91 11/91 update capital project guidelines 07/91 Bridge bonding program Status Update 10/91 Public/Private street - review 07/91 policy Ascertain available mapping 07/91 Develop RFP for study If appropriate for Navarre area 3/12/90 Tabled for additional information 4/7/90 Discussed possible inclusion in a long term Conp Plan 6/91 Signage design being explored 6/21/91 Request on Oxford presented to Council Council table to 9/91 7/15/91 Staff/Cngineerlng discussing sapping project. Bonestroo to return estimates of overall program and also phases. Long term plan - Balance of comnonity 11/91 r f c c (. 1 i i ■J I is' fejirf: AREA GOAL AREA OBJECTIVE DATES STATUS 1. cxmmm DEVELomENr continued ! •90 STO E- Coifinunity Development Direction and Progress A,)Lake Use - iJiCD conprehens 1 ve plan <>9/91 rk»xt l^'D Cities meeting 5/29/91 ( - Lake Use Conimittoe • Inplement 06/91 6/'ll/91 Coimittee held organizational meeting 6/27/91 Reviewed Mission Statement r » B.)Work towards service and results oriented **No Surprises'* process r • C-)Conp Plan Response to Metro Council - Sewer - Transportation 07/91 Possible Inclusion in MUSA uf properties abutting sewered projects. < •91 STO (A)D.)DNR Shoreland/Flood Plain Regulation ♦ Work shops PCATouncil Public hearing - P" 06/91 09/91 6/27/91 Reviewed shoreland regulations development Lake Use Committee Next meeting 7/29/91 C C Council review 12/91 SubmissiooA>WR 02/92 •91 STO (A)E.)Counci1/Planning Conro ission role review 08/91 6/19/91 Initial discussion held r- •91 STO <B)F.)Te lecomnun i ca t i ons facilities 07/91 •91 STO (C)G.)Other Public Facilities 05/91 5/13/91 Adopted new regulations c Motatociin to expire o c o C- gjftfeatiOLij .«■ .J r/ft"’J: I - •-•i r '•’■ ■ 'm !»■ ■ m: 4-• . ■‘t ^&': 7^ AREA CXDAL AREA OBJECTIVE DATES 2. ENVIRatlfKrAL PROTECTION •90 STO A. StubOs Bay •91 STO (C)• ••ennine assessment area interest 07/91 ige an appraiser 08/91 .der cJevelopnent moratorium 10/91 If Appropriate appropriate - prepare PlaM « Jpecl float Ions - Project bid - Assess project - Hold Hearing if - Order project - Bond for project - Coemence project - CoiTplete project 10/91 12/91 01/92 02/92 03/92 04/92 10/92 •09 STO B. Solid Waste Hanagenent Review recycling efforts 06/91 Determine if further solid waste regulation appropriate Review organized collection if needed 11/91 09/91 Review program performance Rebid contract for curbside 10/91 10/91 Review incentives to Improve participation 02/92 STATUS 7/31/90 letters sent to area cwners 9/24/90 Response limited. To use Interested neighbors to assist. 1/22/91 Additional Information transmitted to Ad Hoc group. 3/25/91 - 4/0/91 One resident reediest "grace peried." 4/22/91 Council directs Citizen Conmlttee t develop charge for 5/13 4/30/91 Staff provides Info to Conmittoe. Conmittee charge to 5/13 6/10/91 Conmittee requests additional direction. Tabled to 6/24/91 6/24/91 Council directs Engineer u|>date feasibility and bring back basic areas and options. Expect feasibility study hack 8/12 meeting 6/10/91 Council authorizes brush chipping program as substitu^’e for buming/landfilling of branches. Resf'' can get %»oodchips. 2/91 199^ performance 28t /90 goal - 101 /9l goal - 161 No incentives needed for 1991 I. 1. ■ >• ■■ K ' AREA GOAL AREA3. .ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOftiCNT *90 STO A. 1992 Council Goal Setting *91 STO (C) B, 1992 Budget Process »9B STO C. 1992 Legislative “ Building Plan '•■f. oBjExrrr/E DATFS STATUS Comnence Complete 07/91 10/91 Assessment Board of Review 05/91 Preliminary Budget guidelines 07/91 Capital projects gii^viellnes 07/91 review Present preliminary budget 0H/':J1 Preliminary mill levy adoption 09/01/.’ (Truth in Taxation) Hearing 12/91 Caipleted 5/13/91 6/24/91 Presented original guidelines to Counci I/'Staff Final levy adoption 12/91 Staff Council 08/91 ''i ^ ’'' 'k ^ k *' <5;ii- f’fcr^". ^ . fe% PS«a» ' ■■ AREA GOAL AREA OBJECTIVE DATES STATUS 4. SERVICE DELIVERY •99 STO •91 STO (A) A. Facilities upgrade If Undertaken (See Alternate Schedules) 6/20/91 Council directs staff on issues of financing, design development and public input. 6/24/91 Council sets HRA establisiiient Public Hearing for 7/22. Authorizes Boatman to develop public information. Establishes desing reviei# comnittee. Sets 7/2 as initial meeting. Directs solicitation of Construction Manager. Site acquisition, if arjy Design Final plans/costs Plana/specifications Financing Bid awards 7/19/91 Earnest money submitted. Closing mid September. Subdivision application. 7/2, 7/16, 7/30 Design maetings held 7/23/91 Construction Managers intervie%#ed B. Long Range Financial Policy Develop balance of policy 08/91 C. Business strategy Plana Police - Update Golf Course -09/01/91 r... iii® aUUi f r t t c c c c I ■ 11 J I 4 ^ M .jti sm !»S::* P‘Scu; '•• M$^- i'^-■*^:;r. pix- Wm-’ '' my »•* i^-v .pis. JS'*- AREA GOAL AREA 4. SER\nCE DELIVERY Continued 4 ' D. Service Reviews •9R STO *90 STO *91 STO (B) *91 STO (C) 5. HUrWI RESOURCES •90 STO €• HARKETXNG •91 STO E. Street Lighting F. Woodhill Country Club/ Sewer A. Coofiensation B. Pay Bguity A. COnunications to Residents ... .. ... oBjEcrm Engineering services ooirplete Legal services canplete Determine policy liiplcnent EXrployee Recognition Formulate City employee development Explore performance Incentive program Convert LEO pay Draft report Sukxnit report to State Determine Program Iiiplement 8 DATES 11/91 09/91 03/92 07/91 07/91 08/91 07/91 09/91 11/91 01/92 06/91 07-09/91 STATUS 7/19/91 Received plans. Awaiting Donestroo review and agre^nent docvnents from Woodhill attorney. 6/91 - Preliminary review indicates LEO neod adjustment. 6/20/91 Transmitted letters to residents on Highway 12. V.i * :n. V O K O S O S C H O O 685 Old Crystal Bay Road Long Lake. Minnesota 55356*9592 (612) 473-7313 Fax (612) 473-1477 L S Independent Sdiool District 278 William A. Fenholt Ass't to the Superintendent July 22, 1991 Mr. John Berhardson City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal m 55323 Dear John: This letter wilt serve to inform you that Neal J. Lawson is the new Assistant to the Superintendent for Business Affairs for the Orono School District com mencing July 1, 1991. I will be working for the district through October 31st to finish 1990-91 projects and to assist in the transition, officially retiring on November 1, 1991. Nr. Lawson has a solid background in school business administration. I am sure many of you know him through his previous positions at Mounds View and Hennepin Technical College. He will be in charge of all phases of the business manage ment of the school system as 1 have been. I have appreciated and valued your support and friendship over the years and will certainly miss these contacts. Sincerely, Uilliam A. Fenholt Ass't. to the Supt. WAF:jm Serviog ladepCfKknoe —Long Lake—Maple Plain—Medina—Miimeiofilca Beach—Orono Ad Equal Oppoftunily Employer ^^Reqrclable Paper ■.V. Jr * *■ \ 1 LIST OP LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR MEETING OF August 12, 1991 'V Firearm Use Permit - Park Gun Club 3660 Sixth Avenue North Parade and Special Events Permit -Long Lake Chamber of Ccnui'.-'rv ■ @ Orono Middle School August 17, 1991 2:00 - 6:00 p.m. Culpepper Merriweather Circus Residential Kennel License --Kathryn Duncanson 690 Brown Road North Nancy Ritchie 1075 Tonkawa Road % "Vi m i|fmU yj- m ' f4 ■'f ^v p: Krtp-', f^r,y\0y If;-:- p.y m’- - , ■■ ^.■ ■■:. ySv s- P" „. V':'' iff'''ISA H, • Sftif-sK. my p’-s-Pm'-m DATE;July 19, 1991 TO:Dorothy Hall in FROM:Lt. Cheswick SUBJECT:Park Gun Club Application My recommendation regarding application -for "fire arms use permit" to Park Gun Club, is that they continue to provide us with a schedule of events and abide by the recommendations in the letter sent to them from Popham/Haik on June 21, 1991, which suggests that they take necessary action to eliminate any further problems such as what happened on June 6, 1991 involving horseplay by employee and a club member ifc mmmrn,■i mmII' Lfr. a=-. '■* |r |:V i.v'' ■%' S'iv <4.. p' = M i: i. fe' i' A --• i r>- f-. i CITY OF ORONO cnvcf CRCNOAPPLICATION FOR FIREARM USE PERMITSQ ,_ _ _-lni[fs®ff57 DATE: uAPPLICANTS NAME: APPLICANTS ADDRESS: JUL / 8 1991 PROPERTY OWNER’S NAME: PROPERTY OWNER’S ADDRESS: 3^. DECRIPTION OF PROPERTY: y TYPE OF PERMIT: $»25.00 ANNUAL (Club Only) $10.00 OCCASIONAL (15 to 120 Days) DATE STARTING: PURPOSE: . /. DATE ENDING:^ PJ2STRICTIONS: ___________ I agree that this permit doesn ’t allow the hunting of game birds or game animals in the City of Orono unless specifically stated in this permit and agree to abide by all applicable federal, state and local laws. CiTY OF GRONO Fee Paid: Date: ___ Check: _ Cash: / "1 • 'Of, i M UA t I wn WfiwrTW •^Signayture of applicant * * Oi C£V - 25.Vi / rmt Ji 25.00^ RECOMMENDED:YES REC^T-THM YOU -c Sa^^ty^Director cm m 710:2. 07/13/9 Initials : APPROVED:YES NO city Administrator REMARKS: k ■• ■ li.Fee: S50.00PARADES 6 SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF OROHO, MIMMESOTA Phone Number: ^ Name: -\J it ^ Address: f'-'e y'-Q<^ J Location of Parade or Event: ( y/ C.AJ ^ City, State, Zip:^^3 Person(i) and/or Organization(s) Handling the Event:spn{^) and/or organizarxonvsj nanoAing Date of Event:Hours of Event:- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - R€A8on or Purposo- Insurance Company; C^H Amount: r'fsrwt 4maiir*»nr*o 5/cates to be Submitted witCopy of insurance certxfi'd^es to be submitted with this application. I am aware of all applicable State and other laws regarding parades and special events and will abide by same. I also agree to hold the City of Orono harmless from all liabilities that may arise directly or indirectly from the parade or special event approved by the granting of this permit. A, ^X /<^ Date Approved:Denied:By: Remarks: cin OF FIHANCE OFFICE 1313400000 01 OEM 50,00 CHECK. 71 50,00 RECEIPT-Wm YOU MLWO cool not U5:L \ 03/02/9 ►« • 1I 1 CITY of ORON I ar>r ti-‘, S l^ (]F QRaNO- V:\\ !>r^ 3- M Post Office Box 66-CryataJ Bay. Minnesota 55323• Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY I„ .ccerd.n« with M S. 13.04, Subd 2, ^Rights ^ dat»*, *r« would like “ .3'®“ „y of its departments r.ay require certain private or confidential information. You Aro notifi®<5 that! 1 The information you furnish will be used to determine your ^hliMcaUon for the permit or license requested. ” r' 2. YOU may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that tha City deny the permit or license. Vk-\?;d.r“r a^»cre:%^“^h“Lt:nf n%”e«:t^\rp^"ce« pV™“ °or license. 4 If your requested permit or license requires Council action to apprwe, some information may become publi . YOU have certain rights under M.S. 13.04 to review private data on yourself. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. dpc^4 %Phone X understand my rights as stated above. [gWiyiCaiOWINC - 47M357 ADMINISTRA■nO^ A FINANCE - 473-7358 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 . V ♦ 3- I 4'-= . . ii-V »i-.. t ^ -• • • •• • *, am-- 'll* . ■m-:I:^ il'1'OOKS i ASSOCIAUS LIMIUD HnufMce ^ IkiykiraA ConsuifMs |f‘vt-19^Putk4vcnue kva i oikJ, II (7lii}77l-3!AH (708177^5.119 £i.'Vl ' ■ ■- ':f-. '■■ U{. :■: ’> y .p ,*''t- ':% i Kvp;’ « if'- ISr ■'/,. ■ Ji ■■*" . *. V V k'\' f'T■■■'•■' ■ P'-riv ;^P.. ' ; ■ •- .A;’-'.' . - ^ T’ ■ K- August 6. i991 To i I'olice Chief Gary Cheewick Fix 8 (612) A73-5183 Fromt Rich Brooks Kat Culpopper - Mcrrlwaather Circus Dear Gary: To confirm our conversation of yesterday, I have enclosed a revised Certificate of Insurance lot your file. This shows the City of Orono, Minnesota, itj acents and em- ployccs ds additionaJ insurcOSf In addition, this is to clarify that there are limits as follows: $1,000,000. for Injury of one person $1,000,000. for Injury of two or wore persons $1,000,000. for property damaae^ I trust you will find this information helpful and consletcnt with yovi City Kequlruiiionts. If you have any questions - please feel free to contact me /'Ri'^hard A. Brooks RBt er end . eci Theresa Johnson Culpepper Merrlweather Circus r lirrnvtiiri 1 •JlY ____CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE KEVisn. ‘ K in- n^-o... n;y» j,,., i/t »'Ayh.Vv.x ^ y • roK /3 ‘ i Ci 1 1 (, 4— ,j2 'viSliHeS —--------------------------------------- □ tMM;PD'VYi r ONlY^AN c'^CONEEHS ^ »NFORMAT iON holder . TWS ceR?fR??TE doe ? certificate wiggle B^°;Hri»B"E?cg? COMPANIES AFFC IOINO COVERAGi L* ICuflLUi Wti ih CKtLKf Al J&omAM COMPANY M letter D COMPANV ^ LETTER V Type op insurance OtfWfriUabWly uConvKrcia! 0«Atrjl Li^Wr, LJCitims Mk >o ^O c policy number •r CU^ ^0»rmr*i t Comriclofi pfot ?2ti^4p^^c’ivilP0LicY expiration ! date (MM / DO/ YY) OATS (MM/ 00/ YYJ“nfnnjK ■ rnmir VC’V/L Aifomoblil LMHity 'Any auto IAH OMfflM twios JScRfduiod tutot JHIrpdtutot r. No«v«wn0d autoA Qartot Liability e«H* Liability iQtlW Uian UmbfaWa form mtai'Qniiimaioii tmd In^oyara’ LlabllKy LIMITS (in Ihousaocts) r “KfiTTZ_G;n«.^?l Aocf<o^ie _PfOg^5-Conio/OtfrAfl^n _F»52n»l 4 Adv artitnfl injmy f | f*ch_Occufreftce 11 il2. PAwaoo (Any one firi^__ ^ ” i**M.E*e?2?«jAa w 1^0)7$ _~f< cnjT ^'Parn Lacai lubiMy HC5'~ $iilul« ■ lrn»| SOOHy i>ai7 (pe> prr;3f<! ■nli.v Injury Jptr KCitffll Ptuptny OtlUQC $ I Parttelpant AocMant Occurrenc*Abaraaai* Statutory WkwllONBA OPCAAfiONSllOC«'ICMI|/VF*iir4.l R/AC9Tn<6llJNli/8»FCIAI (TtM4 1—Each Accldani __OiMaso-tNilicy Limit _ AD4D Primary Medical Excoit Medical Di»ea»e-Each Employoo I_____________ t____________ $ WeeKly Ihdemolly | AI iliIIKKAL INii’Jhtf:: a M' rurjof,, in^.ASliAUU\ On IM IlY ^^•.At!Ll; IN SFi;Nbti tlNC 0*i FiL:Hi4^..S I ti^ lltt C1«CJJ> UfiPAllONt i’JI SlJLlLY A3 f.cbl'fCn IH i.a'...LATiii^s ni 11 r n.\f\ n xh ^aj'^Vwmm,NOLDER onolInsuccdaI City of Orono, MN. its SbSAts and owployaaa. ShpN Dote: August 17, I9!>1 fu3k lot ?■ .e Chief Car/ ChcswlcK (64.^) 473-5i83 CANCELLATION a: ■ j-. : ^/JAa -‘*-***^ ifirt 1 ft I-if*- .-p. M 4 4^.' SHOULD ANY OP THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE ThEASRF. THE ISSUINO COMPANV WILL ENOEM/OR TO MAIL. .DAYS WRITTEN notice TO THE CERTlPlC*t k HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT. BUT FAILURE TO MAIL 8UC OTTCE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY K:.40 UPON THE COMPANY. ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES AuTHomnomno^anSLeNTArivfc ^ ■U '■ 5 •;V KZNNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Effective January 1» 19_ _ tc Decenber 3x, 19 Owner:-f ^ >> U nJ C 7^ M Prooerty Address: (g^O ^li> Lo/^^ OVKt- (include city ana zip Mailing Address (if different): Phone: {nome ) 4^4? Zol|. I—(work) •«gTnigwn»TaT. Kennel License Inforaaticn: $25. (payment must accompany application) Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time:—3- - (over i months of age) priBcip.1 9 cn^t(s, tns ^ Purpose for more than 2 fioas: UY Wi \/f 'flAi Cl^fryT^<-lS Dogs normally kept ^jiside "'2- kennel structure cin OF c hCO MO Kennel License Information: $150.00 (payment must accompany application) f r.VAi/^ OFFICE J500000 11.-4! Name of Business: 13i350mi _ ^ 01 CEHuizo^mo ^ -Oi (XH 30M CHECK ■ 71 55.C0ECEiPT-rnm you € Business Activities:_______ —---------------—" i)(e.xample: boarding, breeding, veteri.nary care, retail, eT:u'. H217700 cool MlJllK 07/10/9 ‘sr Normal Business Hours: After Hours Contact: (name) (phone) Dog runs/exercise areas are:inside outside ___both Th« »nd.r,ign.d h.raby ».1«5 on this®form; “"the license approval. Applicant Date Date 1' /?-?/ a.eemm.nds Approval,Denial I-'- ' t T-, , Effect:ive January to Deceinber 31, 19^ Owner: ^ O Q-Vj > ■TsU^-'V Property \ *b ^^»nV (liiclude city and zxp) I-^T^C n CX \^>sN^€jfj£V’1'rfi >|QQ^ (CLMailing Address (if different):_ Phone: (home) JjQVi20n3_ _ _ _ __ BKSIOBHTIAL Kennel License Inforaatiou: (payment must accompany application) t2b.00 Maximum No. of dogs to be Jcept at one time:—3 ----- (over ? months of age) ___ Principal Breed; UIVL • \ ----^ -»-'----^ Purpose for more than 2 dogs: \a . .1^'lL^ Dogs normally kept: ^ Inside /XT. Kennel License InforiMtion: $150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business:_________________________ CITY QF CmO FimCE OFFICE 1313500000 01 CEH 25.00 JHECK Ti 25.00 ^ H t p V\ y-^nnel structure ^ Cgv^'V^'iAtd/ I- i:-i:( Business Activities : —-------—r:-—- ■ ■ i )(e.xamp 1 e: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, t.,) Normal Business Hours:,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ ___ _ _ _ _ After Hours Contact: (name)_ (phone > Dog runs/exercise areas are:inside outside _^oth SSncil*fot’rK.M«l'’t.ie«nse a%'’^V«cified on thls°forn, jhe OrdlMncZ or oth.t law or re^ilation, ^hm cifev D^niissslon to inspect tho pirsinxscs p^x iieease a*.., ^oval. •IT .r^w.^— y^'^ __Date nlr^l^/ teoommends Approval,_J)i_ Denial ^ i»4 * t 0*r • .* aU . — - -- 01/04/91 PR: 10 CB PRREQOR EHP • NAME DPT 470204B24 471641060 SOS662430 474S63336 471440671 464044600 470500346 475443462 472S03B91 466526026 476643347 475949721 464421014 472526007 464701464 507545424 466646562 464420432 466047444 474667412 475340151 477500666 475444249 471566463 473141624 477647279 475604753 470114449 504260307 472500574 470544'0« 121262 47S344- 'Oil ■5061 dA 1422333 .7024779 73104424 «64909535 476743251 470700901 469444107 475342943 473746173 473909629 469629194 475569177 ABRAHAMSON, FREDERIC ANOERSC;., ^RUCE L BERNHAROSON^ MARK E BOBZIEN^ SU^ A BOSMA, ^AMIE L BOWMAN. ERIK A BRAUN. ROBERT R BRINKHAUS. JOHN F CHESWICK, GARY 8 CORNICK, JAMES L DELANEY. JANE E OEMBOUSKI. JAY C ENGLISH lil. IRVING ERICKSON. KURT R FISCHENICH, DAN 7 FRITZLER, JOHN M GAFFRON, MICHAEL P OERHAROSON, JOHN R GOMAN. DAViO J GREGORY. JAMES D HALLIN. DOROTHY M HANSEN, STEVEN C HANSIira. CAROL J JOHNSON. BRADLEY P JOSTROM. FOREST J KARNITZ, RICKY D KENNEN. JANICE M KLEVANN JR. PAUL J KNUTSON, CHARLOTTE A KUEHN. THOMAS M LINDSTROM. DAVIO J MABUSTH, iEANNE A MCTNTVRE. WILLIAM E MILLS JR, WALTER H MOROWCZYNSKI, JAMES NAAB. THEREsA L NELSON, DAVID 0 OAS, DANIEL 0 OBERAIGNER. SCOTT G OBRIEN. RANDY L OMAN. LYLE E PALMER. GREGORY A, QUAST, WAYNE A RATHBUN. BARRY : ROSS. j6hn a SKREtN. DALE S STEFFENHAGEN, RONALD 93 31 12 31 12 61 93 42 31 31 93 31 31 31 31 31 33 42 35 42 12 42 31 31 93 31 31 61 15 15 93 33 93 93 31 12 35 93 42 92 33 42 92 92 83 .42 93 101269719 472563051 474663296 470704904 475505292 464629444 500403192 477441539 STEVENS, BETTY 0 THOMTON. MARK R TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE TOMCZYK, MARK W VANG. BAuCE L VEE. LINDA S WALTERS. LINDA •’ WECKMAN. STEPH 93 31 31 31 33 2 15 33 VTD GROSS 00 67 05 28 41 00 50 82 .73 44 41 89 75 60 19 56 89 675 26802 41012 15398 8976 2352 552 24330.99 26344.00 26843.50 50.00 8065 26069 23015 24337 25384 22243 30276 684 21155 19160 17546.31 8854.86 25261.09 •: .T35.00 6463.23 194.91 1880.00 15317.40 32662.97 337.50 28528.13 157.50 1645.90 25899.35 15470.19 2800.01 1636.25 15568.46 18100 22478 1S557 21^53 184‘0 3.0 1818l> 19187 89 09 71 15 57 76 41 >^5 1551.00 22821.91 25254.52 22996.07 18652.27 13431.82 17479.42 14441.72 CURRENT GROSS 63 72 72 00 00 .52 00 36 79 08 81 00 24 87 85 71 28 70.00 1865.98 5241 958 577 280 50 1522 88 1648 00 1705 50 1113 1570 1426 1899 1659 1392 2152 84 1181 1199 . 1022.37 519.54 1817 135. 130 194 30C.00 958.71 2048.08 35.00 1743 157 212 1831 958 221 112 870.07 1340.33 1392.24 921.28 1581.42 1023.60 36.75 1017.79 1200.96 82 00 55 91 52 50 63 02 72 84 75 255.00 1381.68 1537 1492 1199 862 1056 945 12 99 27 88 32 12 58,165.22 07/21/91 PR: 100 CB PRREGOR a •s. EMP • NAM.: 470204924 471688060 05662439 474563339 471840871 469044600 470500346 475443862 472503391 469526026 475989721 468821018 468622840 472529007 468701868 507585424 469686562 468420832 469087884 474667812 475330151 477500666 475444249 471569863 473141624 477647279 504260307 472500574 470584708 121262417 472045960 476018974 470667594 334506281 474822333 477028779 473108428 468909535 476783251 470700901 469848107 475382983 473746173 473609629 469629194 475569177 101268716 ABRAHAMSON. FREDERIC ANDERSON. BRUCE L BERNHARDSON. MARK E BOBZIEN. SUE A BOSMA. JAMIE L BOWMAN. ERIK A BRAUN. ROBERT R BRINKHAUS, JOHN F CHESWICK. GARY B CORNICK. JAMES L DEMBOUSKI, JAY C ENGLISH III IRVING ERICKSON. DOUGLAS J ERICKSON KURT R FISCHENICH DAN T FRITZLER. JOHN M GAFFRON MICHAEL GERHARDSON. JOHN GOMAN. DAVID J GREGORY. JAMES D HALLIN. DOROTHY M STEVEN C CAROL J BRADLEY P FOREST J P R HANSEN HANSING JOHNSON JOSTROM KARNITZ. RICKY D KNUTSON. CHARLOTTE KUFHN. THOMAS M LINDSTROM, DAVID J MABUSTH, JEANNE A MCWHITE. ROBERT B MILLS JR. WALTER H MORAN. MARK F MOROWCZYNSKI. JAMES NAAB. THERESA L NELSON, DAVID D OAS. DANIEL 0 OBERAIGNER. SCOTT G OBRIEN. RANDY L OMAN, LYLE E PALMER. GREGORY A OUAST. WAYNE A RATHBUN, BARRY J ROSS. JOHN A SKREEN. DALE S STEFFENHAGEN. RONALD STFVF' R^TTY G 93 31 31 12 35 93 42 92 33 42 92 92 93 42 93 >3 472563051 474663296 470704904 475505292 468629488 500403192 477881539 THOMTON. MARK R TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE TOMCZYK. MARK W VANG. BRUCE L VEE. LINDA S WALTERS. LINDA G WECKMAN. STEPHEN J 31 31 31 33 12 15 33 DPT CURPENT GROSS 93 605 00 65.00 31 24936 69 1704.49 12 35770 42 2221.36 31 14439.56 1039.61 12 8348 69 680.85 61 2072.00 504.00 93 502.50 162.504222808.11 1522.88 31 24696 00 1648.003125137 98 1640.74 31 6952 46 1217.323124498 94 1583.75 93 80 50 CO.50 31 21C89.36 1470.10 31 22437 60 1709.83 31 23725 89 1599.04 33 20851 51 1392.24 42 28123 73 1830.7235599 34 90.16 42 19973 85 1255.79 12 17961.61 1199.284216523 94 1042.9731SS-’S 32 743.653123443 27 1602.15931100 00 220.00316332 68 331.631514358.69 958.731530614.89 2048.0893302.50 67.503326784.61 1743.51 00 27 46 33 47 1433 17102 24068 14511 2578.17 1523.50 14698.39 16760 21085 14736 20271 17426 294 17168 17986 1296 56 85 43 73 97 01 62 59 00 21440.23 23717 40 21503.08 17453 00 12568 94 16423.10 13496 60 150.00 215.;<S 467.55 83 72 47 75 1633 958 237 156 1033.2? 1023.62 1392.25 921.27 129C.96 1177.15 70.88 1013.21 1200.96 126.00 1407.59 1611.39 1514 12 1191 28 862 89 1056.32 945.12 55.102.18 li . ix:*",mift,u‘-; ir.•v'- m f*1811 CITY OF OiONO CNCCK NO. DATE224002224002 • ■•••a 224014 22401S aaaaaa 224020 aaaaaa 224030 224030 224030 224930 224030 224030 224031 224031 224031 224031 224031 224034 224037 224037 2240IS224089 224089 224089 |o- I 224087 08/08/8108/06/81 08/06/81 08/08/81 08/06/81 08/06/81 08/06/81 08/06/81 08/06/81 08/06/81 08/06/81 08/06/81 08/06/81 08/06/81 01/06/91 08/06/81 08/06/81 08/06/81 08/06/81 08/06/91 08/06/91 08/0«. >i 08/Ot;91 08/06/91 m AMOUNT134.38145.83210.21 41.36 41.36 • 16.75 16.75 • 5.937.50 5.937.50 * 24 24 3224 24 24 153 13 13 50 12 12 12 12 • .61 1.38 2.13 1.07 .63 5.82 390.66 390.66 * 26.06 57.58 83.64 • 146.97 53.25 175.73 53.25 429.20 32.20 CHECK REGISTERVENDORA-1 MINNETONKA RENT A*1 MINNETONKA RENT ALL STAR ELECTRIC AT&T AMERICAN NA7w BANK ANCHOR PAPER AUGIES MOBILE CHEF AUGIES MOBILE CHEF 6LACK0WIAK & SONS BLACKOWIAK & SONS 6LACK0WIAK & SONS oLACKOWIAK & SONS SAM BLOOM IRON ITEM DESCRIPTIONRENT AIR COMP SAW RENTAL REP TRAFFIC LGT TELEPHONE BOND INT DUE 9/1 PAPER SANDWICHS SANDWICH TRASH HAUL TRASH HAUL TRASH HAUL TRASH HAUL PIPE ACCOUNT NO. INV01-4331-249-4201-4331-249-42 01-4233-249-42 01-4320-175-34 44-4620-907-00 AT &T INFO SYSTEM DATA PROC 01-4340-059-14 AT &T INFO SYSTEM DATA PROC 01-4340-069-15 AT &T INFO SYSTEM DATA PROCS 01-4340-129-31 AT &T INFO SYSTEM DATA PROC 01-4340-128-31 AT A T INFO SYSTEM DATA PROC 01-4340-174-33 AT A T INFO SYSTEM DATA PROC 01-4340-24& 42 AT &T COMM TELEPHONE 01-4320-039-12 AT &T COMM TELEPHONE 01-4320-069-15 AT A T COMM TELEPHONE 01-4320-129-31 AT A T COMM TELEPHONE 01-4320-174-33 AT A T COMM TELEPHONE 74-4320-590-93 01-1261-000-00 74-4802-591-94 74-4802-591-94 01-4343-099-17 01-4343-129-31 01-4343-280-61 74-4343-580-93 01-4232-249-42 08-12-91 PAGE • P.O. • MESSAGE 1 aaa-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS -CKS •“•-CKS M t *-CKS -CKS i i r' 1991 CITY OP ORONO CHECK NO. DATE 224098 224068 224070 224070 224074 224074 224074 224074 224074 224074 224074 224074 224074 224074 224074 224074 224074 224074 224074 • ••••• 224011224081 224011 224083 22408S224085 224110 224110224110 08/06/91 08/08/91 08/06/91 08/06/91 08/06/91 08/06/91 08/06/91 08/06/91 08/06/91 08/06/91 08/06/91 01/06/91 08/06/91 08/06/91 08/06/91 08/06/91 08/06/91 08/06/91 08/06/91 08/U6/91 08/06/91 08/06/91 08/06/91 08/06/91 08/06/91 0£'/C./91 <V)i/08/91 08706/91 AMOUNT 32 20 • 246 00 41.00 287.00 * 7.649.66 7.353.47 15.003.13 • 100 1.050 240 392 150 1.194 150 2.076 155 33 76 752 387 78 154 6.991 00 00 00 50 00 23 00 21 40 75 27 18 25 75 86 40 • 101 77 51.16 73.42 226.35 • 11.485.06 11.485.06 * 45.00 229.01 274.01 126.00 70.00 276.00 472.00 • CHECK REGISTERVENDOR BIFFS INC BIFFS INC BOARHAN & ASSOCIATES BOARMAN A ASSOCIATES BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN BLACKS PHOTOGRAPHY BLACKS PHOTOGRAPHY BLACKS PHOTOGRAPHY BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS BUDGET PRINTING BUDGET PRINTING CHAPIN PUBLISHI<G CHAPIN PUBLISHING CHAPIN PUBLISHING ITEM DESCRIPTION 6 BIFFS 1 BIFF PUBLIC WKS SCHEMATIC CITY HALL SCHEMATIC ENG RETAINER MAY COMP PLAN AMEND 3 ENG CONSULT MAY ENG CONSULT MAY ENG BEDERWOOO PK APPLICATIONS MAY ENG CONSULT HAY NAV HGTS STORM SWR ENG PUHPHSE 3 HAY ENG CONSULT HAY ENG ADHIN HAY INSP PUHPHSE 3 HAY LS 10 REPLAHNT MAY ENG CONSULT MAY ENG ADMIN MAY PHOTO REFISH FILM FILM ROCK PRINTING PRINTING AD SEALCOAT MCCULLY ROAD AD LIFT 11 ACCOUNT NO. INV 01-4331-290-61 74-4331-590-93 15-4306-651-00 15-4306-651-00 01-4304 01-4305 01-4305 01-4305 01-4305 01-4305 15-4305 24-4305 72-4305 72-4305 72-4306 72- 4306 73- 4305 73-4305 73-4306 200-41 200-41 200-41 249-42 290-61 840-71 651-00 424-00 437-85 549-91 436- 84 437- 85 433- 81 569-92 434- 82 01-4210-129-31 01-4210-174-33 01-4210-249-42 01-4233-249-42 01-4322-129-31 01-4322-129-31 01-4323-249-42 01-4323-249-42 73-4323-569-92 08-12-91 PAGE 2 • P.O. • MESSAGE •••-CKS -CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS - i'' F I 1991 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE«^#5" 224124 * ■ 'y A Ot/06/91 06/06/91 01/06/91 01/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/61 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/61 06/06/91 ''6/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 iissfe.# AMOUNT CHECK REGISTERVENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION account no. INV 01-12-81 PAGE 8 • P.O. • MESSAGE 66.00 •»>AHVr40f CITYVIEW PLMBG A HTG REPAIR AC JIAAAIB-.AC-' 01-4343-129-31 ^ 41Sa-»90-91_ 7Ta44.iOi (p(p.eO 324.15 324.15 * COCA COLA VENDING POP 74-4802-591-94 1.10 .85 6.14 25.65 16.85 3.40 39.94 6.99 20.19 1.42 2.13 .65 85- COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/ORP COMMERCIAL LIFE/ORP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL cIFE/ORP AUG INS AUG INS AUG INS AUG INS AUG INS AUG INS AUG INS AUG INS AUG INS PUG INS AUG INS AUG INS AUG INS AUG INS 01-3872-000-00 01-3872-000-00 01-4152-039-1201-4152-069-15 01-4152-121-31 01-4152-126-31 01-4152-129-31 01-4152-174-33 01-4152-249-42 72- 4152-549-91 73- 4152-569-92 74- 4152-590-91 74-4152-590-91 74-4152-590-93 r- - if-. —sJMi<09/94-—-T-riwrro- - COMMCRCIAL l,IFE/OfrP- - - -AUG-fttSr^- - --- — ‘F-- r . •224147 oi/oe/91 16.80 CROWN HARKING INC NAME PLATE 01-4210-020-11 .16.80 • ' : . V. 224157 OS/06/91 419.40 DAHLGREN SHARDLOW HWY 12 COORIDOR JUNE 01-4306-299-72 224157 01/06/91 74.03 DAHLGREN SHARDLOW LL ANNEX JUNE 01-4306-299-72 224157 08/06/91 622.40 DAHLGREN SHARDLOW SHORELAND REGS JUNE 01-4306-299-72 ; '1.115.83 • t-224163 06/06/91 127.70 DYNAHED MEDICAL SUPPLIES 01-4232-129-31 -• - 127.70 • • t. F-'' 224187 06/06/91 115.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER 74-4815-591-94 t] 115.00 • 224199 06/06/91 5.500.00 ROLF E ERICKSON AUG FEE 01-4307-059-14 •••-CKS •••-CKS •■•-CKS ■••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS • • •-CKS •••-CKS V. -‘u.-pm <■; 19tl CITY CHECK NO 224100 224250 224250 224250 224250 224250 224250 224251 224207 224207 224207 224272 224272 224272 224272 224272 224272 224272 224270 224270 224200 224200 224204 ii 224201 t - OF OKONO DATE 00/00/01 01/06/91 Ot/06/9100/06/01 00/00/91 00/06/91 00/06/91 00/06/91 00/00/91 00/06/01 00/06/91 00/06/91 00/06/91 00/00/91 00/06/01 00/00/01 00/06/91 CHECK REGISTERAHOUNT 29.00 5,529.00 * VENDOR ROLF E ERICKSON ITEM DESCRIPTION POSTAGE 76.08 1.59 290.97 170.90 547.62 GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS 119.95- 119.95 119.95 119.95 • GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD QLENWOOO INGLEWOOD GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD WATER WATER WATER 920.00 920.00- 920.00 920.00 GOLF CAR MIDWEST GOLF CAR MIDWEST GOLF CAR MIDWEST GOLF CARTS GOLF CARTS GOLF CARTS 397.91 • 52.00 70.00 130.00 * GOPHER STATE ONECALL GOPHER STATE ONECALL JULY FEE JULY FEE 74.50 4.14- 70.36 • HACK CHEMICAL CO HACH CHEMICAL CO CHEMICALS RETURNED MDSE 30.60 30.60 HAPPYS POTATO CHIP CHIPS 4.99 HALLIN/DOROTHY MILEAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV 01-4321-059-14 01-4232-249-42 01-4232-290-61 72- 4232-549-91 73- 4232-569-92 01-4231-099-1401-4231-099-14 01-4231-099-17 74-4331-590-93 74-4331-590-93 74-4331-590-93 08/00/91 240.95 Q &K SERVICES UNIFORM**01-4221-249-42 08/06/91 04.56 Q &K SERVICES MATS 01-4231-129-31 00/06/91 27.52-Q 01 K SERVICES UNIFORMS 72-4221-549-91 00/06/91 27.52 G &K SERVICES UNIFORMS 72-4221-549-91 00/06/91 27.52 G &K SERVICES UNIFORMS 72-4221-549-91 00/00/91 27.52 G A K SERVICES UNIFORMS 73-4221-569-92 00/06/91 9.36 Q A K SERVICES UNIFORMS 74-4221-590-93 72- 4306-549-91 73- 4306-569-92 72-4234-549-91 72-4234-549-91 74-4802-591-94 01-4381-039-12 08-12-91 PAGE 4 9 P.O. 0 MESSAGE •••-CKS •••-CKS ‘••-CKS * a It -CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS p-'?'*»' *k.;.1991 CITY Of ORONO■f .: •CHECK NO.DATEr'-/' ■ 1> ', 224295 08/06/91 224308 08/06/91 :■ h ■ 224308 08/UI.V91 E 224330 08/06/91 f-. k j,,224334 08/06/91224334 08/06/91 224397 08/06/91 r 224397 08/06/91 n‘224397 08/06/91 224409 224423 224423 K*. *«•••• 224435 224435 K. - msf OI/06/fll Ot/06/91 01/06/91 08/06/91 08/06/91 08/06/91 08/06/91 AMOUNT 4.99 32.50 32.50 • 38.25 85.05 123.30 • 150.75 150.75 • 2.00 132.90 134.60 • 76.04 8.93 17.86 102.83 • 197.00 197.00 • 330.00 3.945.00 4.275.00 • 4,135.68 4,207.38 8.343.06 * 58.80 6.532.50 6,591.30 ‘ CHECK REGISTERVENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED HENN CTY SHERIFF DPT HENN CTY SHERIFF DPT ICMA RETIREMNT TRUST INNOVATIVE MICROQRAP INNOVATIVE MICROQRAP KUEHN-THOHAS KUEHN-THOMAS KUEHN-THOMAS LMC HAP PROGRAM LEAGUE OF MN CITIES LEAGUE OF MN CITIES LOGIS - SUITE 300 LOGIS - SUITE 300 CITY OF LONG LAKE CITY OF LONG LAKE GRASS SEED REPAIR JUNE BCOKING FEE ICMA 7/8-7/21 PRINT MICROFILM MILEAGE MILEAGE MILEAGE LMC HAP DUES CONF LMC DUES LOGIS JULY LOGIS JUNE 2ND QTR 2ND OTR WTR 08-12-91 PAGE 5 ACCOUNT NO. INV. i P 0. t MESSAGE 01-4233-249-42 01-4342-129-31 01-4358-080-16 01-4140-039-12 01-3500-000-00 01-4306-174-33 01-4381-069-15 01-4381-174-33 73-4381-569-92 01-4380-020-11 01-4356-020-11 01-4380-020-11 01-1299-000-00 01-1299-000-00 01-4324-129-31 72-4359-549-91 •*»-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •**-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS 8181 ft -CKS ft 81 ft-CKS r 1091 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE 224439 224439 224439 224441 224441 224441 224449 224441 224441 224449 224460 224477 224477 224477 224477 224477 224477 224477 224477 224477 224477 224477 224477 224490 224490 22449S 224495 224496 k:" 09/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 08/06/91 09/06/91 08/06/91 08/06/91 08/06/91 08/06/91 08/06/91 08/06/91 08/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 08/06/91 08/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 AMOUNT 9.01 68.35 1.16 78.52 • 35.25 105.33 140.58 • 13 13 13 13 13 67 49 49 48 49 48 43 * 80.00 pQ.OO • 10.35 59.08 26 7 7 32 85 7 7 35 26 7 314 06 82 82 67 42 82 82 98 06 82 72 • 748.67 585.70 1.334.37 ‘ 13 31 45 50 50 00 126.00 CHECK REGISTERVENDOR ITEM CESCRIPTION LONG LK FORD TRACTOR LONG LK FORD TRACTOR LONG LK FORD TRACTOR PARTS PARTS PARTS LONG LAKE TIRE SERV LONG LAKE TIRE SERV LANIER LANIER LANIER LANIER LANIER VOICE VOICE VOICE VOICE VOICE PROD PROD PROD PROD PROD MARK VII DIST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST y WEST ► WEST M*^wt*ST Mir VEST MIDWEST MIDWlIT BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS PROD PROD PROD PROO PROD PROO PROD PROD PROO PROD PROO PROO REPAIR TIRES FAX PAPER FAX PAPER FAX PAPER FAX PAPER FAX PAPER BEER OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPP' 'E3 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES ACCOUNT NO. INV 01-4232-249-42 0’-4232-290-61 Oa-4342-290-61 01-4342-249-42 01-4342-249-42 01-4210-039-12 01-4210-059-14 01-4210-069-15 01-4210-174-33 01-4210-249-42 74-4U15-591-94 01-4210 01-4210 01-4210 01-4210 01-4210 01-4210 01-4210 01-4210 01-4210- 01-4210 01-4210- 01-4210- -039-12 -039-12 -059-14 -059-14 -069-15 -069-15 -129-31 129-31 174-33 174-33 249-42 249-42 MIDWEST ASPHALT MIDWEST ASPHALT ASPHALT ASPHALT 01-4233-249-42 01-4233-249-42 MPLS OXYGEN CO MPLS OXYGEN CO DEMURRAGE DEMURRAGE 01-4232-129-31 01-4232-249-42 STAR TRIBUNE SECRETARY AD 01-4323-039-12 08-12-91 PAGE 6 • P.O. • MESSAGE • D •-CKS •••-CKS 81 • •-CKS ••■-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS ■■■•r . V' ' *fe■/fh ti’ I: iT 1891 CITY CHECK NO OF ORONO DATE22449S 224491 224499 224522224522 224522 224522 224525 224525 224592 224562 224592 224592 224592 224582 224562 224562 224562 224562 224562 224562 224592 224582 ^ 226586p.;F- 224571 224571 if"'- V 09/06/91 r» . 09/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/9109/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/9109/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 09/08/91 09/06/91 09/06/9109/06/91 m m AMOUNT126.00 *24.99 24.99 * 159.50 15.44 173.94 • 92.64 300.00* 10,215.00 85.00 10.092.64 • 5.91 392.82 398.73 • 5i 410. 344 2. 176. 6. 24. 309. 40. 11.36. 970.7. 142. 2.538. •.2 87 52 91 73 99 93 33 79 09 47 17 42 37 01 1,086.76 1,086.76 • 15.731.25 20C.00 15.931.25 • CHECK REGISTERVENDORMN BENEFIT ASSN MN CELLULAR TELE MN CELLULAR TELE MTl DIST CO MTI OIST CO MTI OIST CO MTI DIST CO MINN UC FUND MINN UC FUND NSP NSPNSF NSP NSP NSPNSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NORWEST BANK MINN NA NORWEST BANK MINN NA ITEM DESCRIPTIONAUG INS TELEPHONE TELEPHONE PARTS TRADE hustler TORO MOWER COOLER UC GARLOCK UC YEAGER UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES ST LTGS INT DUE 9-1-91 PAYING AGENT FEE ACCOUNT NO. INV01-4151-129-31 01-4320-129-31 01-4320-249-42 01-4342-290-61 14-3842-634-CO 14-4560-634-00 74-4232-590-93 01-4154-040-1374-4154-590-93 01-4324 01-4324 01-4324 01-4.324 01-4324 01-4324 01-4324 72-4324 72- 4324 73- 4324 73-4324 73- 4324 74- 4324 74-4324 -099-17 -099-17 -129-31 -175-34 -249-42 -290-61 -290-61 -549-91 -549-91 -569-92 -569-92 -569-92 -590-93 -590-93 01-4325-249-42 43-4620-906-00 43-4630-906-00 09-12-91 PAGE 7 • P.O. • MESSAGE-CKS CKS -CKS ■ ft ft -CKS -CKS -CKS •••-CKS ....1991 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE 224992 224595 224590 224590 • •••a* 224597 224597 224915 aaaaaa 224621 224621 224621 224621 224621 224621 224621 224621 224621 224621 224621 224621 224627 A aaaaaa 224631 aaaaaa mm, 09/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 09/09/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 09/06/91 9 i<Sfeis'.v .. — «ei > AMOUNT 39.28 39.26 • 15.00 15.00 1.300.52 199.10 1.499.62 • 3.865.90 3.821.81 7.887.71 • 6.00 6.00 • 09/06/91 1.167.00 09/06/91 1.167.00- 1.167.0009/06/91 756.00 09/06/91 462.00 09/06/91 294.0009/06/91 420.32 2!/25/*i 966.16 08/06/91 378.0009/06/91 1.155.00P*'08/91 210.00 09/U6/91 315.00 6.123.48 • 09/06/91 50.25 50.25 • 09/06/91 3.390 00 3.3Y0.00 • aCHECK REGISTERVENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION OMAN/LYLE MILEAGE ORONO INDEP SCHOOL MTG EXP OTTEN BROS OTTEN BROS Ml CHEVY CHASE SOD/STRAW PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 7/22-8/4 PERA 7/8-7/21 PERRYS VENTURES INC CAR WASH LKA DOT RECYCLING JULY FEE ACCOUNT NO. INV 01-4381-174-33 01-438?0:0-ll 01-4233-249-42 01-4233-243-42 01-2031-000-00 01-2031-000-00 73-4342-569-92 MEDICA CHOICE AUG INS 01-3872-000-00MEDICACHOICEAUGINS01-3C75-000-00MEDICACHOICEAUGINS01-3875-000-00MEDICACHOICEAUGINS01-4151-039-12MEDICACHOICEAUGINS01-4151-069-15MEDICACHOICEAUGINS01-4151-121-31MEDICACHOICEAUGINS01-4151-126-31MEDICACHOICEAUGINS01-4151-129-31MEDICACHOICEAUGINS01-4151-174-33MEDICACHOICEAUGINS01-4151-249-42MEDICACHOICEAUGINS72-4151-549-91MEDICACHOICEAUGINS73-4151-569-92 PITNEY BOWES MTR RENTAL 01-1321-129-31 01-..*397-295-65 08-12-91 PAGE 6 6 P.O. 6 MESSAGE•••-CKS •••-CKS •• '-CKS -CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS -CKS •••-CKS M ^-CKS -:•:r"'-i 1 ' i ♦•1961 CXTY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 31'4 -91 PAGE 8CHECK NO.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. ZNV.t !«.0. 1 .>1ESSAQE■: '.U-' X-. 224661 09/06/91 81.12 31.12 •SCHARBER & SONS INC PARTS 01-4342-290-61 224662 224662 09/06/91 09/06/91 73.17 127.50 200.67 • REED VENDING REED VENDING CANDY A CIOS CANDY A CIGS 74-4802-501-84 74-4802-501-94 ••*-CKS 1 224665 224695 224695 09/06/91 08/08/91 09/06/91 200.00 100.00 100.00 400.00 • LAURIE K SCHEFFLER LAURIE K SCHEFFLER LAURIE •< SCHEFFLER CC MTQ PLANNING HTO PARK HTG 01-4306-039-12 01-4306-174-33 01-4306-290-61 } •- ■ ‘v-. •••••• •■•-CKS 1 ^ . 224693 09/06/91 2,826.00 2.826.00 * SCHOENING EXCAVATING HAUL SWEEPING 01-4233-249-42 • ••••• •••-CKS J " 224697 224697 09/06/91 09 «4/91 1,366.19 1.303.72 2,669.91 * SCHARBER A SONS SCHARBER A SONS REPAIR REPAIR MOWER 01-4342-249-42 01-4342-290-61 ■f. H 7U779 '■{ 2^4771 oi/oe/91 01/06/91 # *>2.50 52.50 •THORPE DIST CO BEER 74-4815-591-94 39.95 39.95 • TOLL CO PART 01-4232-249-42 L-224915 09/06/91 77 ■■ 224915 09/06/91 u . 7722491509/06/91 94.3B t -224915 224915 09/06/91 09/06/91 50.93 153.0722491509/06/91 61.77T---224915 09/06/81 50.77r22491509/06/01 6B.7722491509/06/01 10.321-^'224915 09/06/91 24.0622491508/06/91 64.1922461509/06/81 124.20 787.00 h: ' W' ^ 22A935 - ■ . ♦ r .. 4 . 09/06/01 33.03 US US US US US US US US US US US US WEST WEST WEST WEST WEST WEST WPST \ -ST WEST WEST WEST WEST COMHUN COMMUN COMHUN COMMUN COMMUN COMHUN COMMUN COMMUN COMMUN COM4UN COMMUN COMHUN TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE ADV 01-4320 01-4320 01-4320 01-4320 01-43?'' 01-4:‘i.01-w,.0< 01-4320- 72- 4320- 73- 4320- 74- 4320- 74-4323- -039-12 059-14 -069-15 -129-31 -129-31 174- 33 175- 34 249-42 549-91 569-92 590-93 590-93 WARNING LITES OF MN FLASHERS 01-4331-249-42 -CKS A M »-CKS •*»-CKS ■**-CKS O L;'r Is. sf?' Is-' ■ si;,.>' f •11991 CITY OP 090N0 CHECK REGISTER 08-12-91 PAGE 10CHECK NO . DATE AMOUNT ViNDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV.0 P.O. 8 MESSAGE 224137 333.03 • •**-CKS 08/08/91 12.58 12.58 •VEE LIN MILEAGE 01-4381-039-12 224941 224841 •••-CKS08/ 08/l 906.58 100.20 1.006 78 ■ WATER PRODUCTS CO WATER PRODUCTS CO PARTS PARTS 72- 4234-549-91 73- 4234-569-92 224845 08/06/91 84.76 84.76 •WECKMAN STEPHEN M .EAGE C* -4381-174-33 •••-CKS 224851 08/08/91 480.15 480.15 •W HENN RECYCLING COM FEE 01-4306-295-f5 •••-CKS 224875 08/*»6/91 8.28 8.28 •WRIGHT HENN ELECTRIC UTILITIES 01-4324-249-42 •••-CKS 224894 08/06/91 654.39 654 39 •YOCUM OIL CO INC DIESEL 01-4220-249-42 •••-CKS 224901 08/06/91 629.40 629.40 •AMERIOATA MAINT IBM Ji-4340-129-31 •••-CKS 224902 08/06/91 144.00 144.00 *DORAOUS CORP OTR MAINT 01-4342-175-34 224903 08/06/91 558.66 558.66 *tAGLE GOLF BALL CO GOLF balls 74-4801-591-94 224904 08/06/91 34.50 34.50 •HENNEriN CTY TREAS DISKS/MAPS 01-4210-040-13 224909 . ^ . r 08/06/91 80.00 90.00 •NATL FIRE PROTECTION MEMBERSHIP 01-4380-174-33 224907 08/06/91 13.50 13.50 •REGAL CLEANERS CLEAN BLANKETS -1-4342-129-31 •••-CKS 224908 08/06/91 6,647.00 TRUCK UTILITIES CO HOIST 73-1500-000-00 y..'-'^'C I *'.fl'‘'.‘: ;''''r._ >.v.'iHfe r . t f I3T1991 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTERCHECK NO . DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV22490808/06/91 6 275.00922.00 A TRUCK UTILITIES CO REPAIR TRUCK 73-4232-569-92 224909 08/06/91 829.00 829.00 % JOHNSON GOLF SUPPLY SCORECARDS 74-4322-590-93 224910 08/06/91 154 98 154 98 M KILLMER ELECTRIC CO REP ST LGTS 01-4342-249-42 224911 08/06/91 2 2 .416 00 .416 00 • WOOOHILL CTRY CLUB KILBO DINNER 90-3790-000-00 224912 08/06/91 189 00 189 00 a ON SITE ENV SERV INS TRAING TAPES 01-4356-249-42 224913 08/06/91 15 00 15.00 tp: k sports REPAIR 74-4342-590-93 224914 08/06/91 55 00 55.00 • CANDLELIGHT LIMO LIMO KILBO 90-3790-000-00 224915 08/06/91 321.48 321.48 CONTECH CONST PROOCT CULVERTS 01-4233-249-42 224916 224916 08/06/91 08/06/91 85.94 145.18 231.12 HELENA CHEMICAL HELENA CHEMICAL INSECTICIDE FUGISIDE 74-4343-590-93 74-4343-590-93 224917 08/06/91 12.90 12 90 a MIlLER DAVIS OFFICE FORMS 01-4210-069-15 224918 224918 08/06/91 08/06/91 17 01 75 43 92 44 • LONG LAKE LONG LAKE FLASHER LIFT STAT 01-4325-249-42 73-4344-569-92 224919 224919 08/06/91 08/06/91 33.96 33.97 >7.93 ■ BELL 4 HOWELL BELL 4 HOWELL LAMPS LAMPS 01-4210-039-12 01-4210-174-33 224930 08/06/91 110.00 110 00 • WEST SIDE REDI MIX CONCRETE 01-4343-099-17 70.497 9.915 15.153 2.078 15.931 5 9 9 4 2 937 469 661 361 471 07 00 13 21 25 50 39 77 43 00 FUND 01 FUND 14 FUND FUND FUND 43 FUND 44 FUND FUND FUND 15 24 72 73 74 FUND 90 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL GENERAL FUND IMPROVE & EQUIP OUTLAY F BUILDNG CAPITAL OUTLAY F PERM IMPROVE REVOLVING F 1980 IMP BOND D/S FUND 1982 IMP BOND D/S FUND WATER OPERATING FUND SEWER OPERATING FUND GOLF COURSE OPERATING FD 08-12-81 PAGE •••-CKS •••-CKS a O o I . HU i !£ J.; :• h-' I- Sit o.^'I COUNCIL A/iEcTiNG AUC 1 2 1991 CITV OF ORONO ^'. *•r-’705 Old Long Lake Road Orono, Wayzata MN 55391 July 21, 1990 0]C <)r ORONO _ [M The Mayor City of Orono Town Hall Crystal Bay, MN JUL 2 4 1991 Dear Madam, I write in regard to the proposed routes for US Highway 12, discussed at numerous local town meetings, and in the press. It seems that one of the major reasons for the US 12 upgrade has been lost in these discussions: the towns west of Long Lake /Orono/Maple Plain want a high speed uncongested highway or expressway to the Twin Cities. Tliey do not care if the route adds a few miles to their destination, provided it is fast. In contrast to this, the residents of the local towns faced with one of the several corridors, are devastated at the prospect of losing their houses, or having a highway with 40,000 vehicles whizzing past their semi-rural yards, and the possible destruction of the much used and treasured Luce Line. The exception seems to be several Long Lake businesses who expect me 55/65 mph traffic to make the occassional pit stops to enhance their turnover. We also have the Minnesota Department of Transportation and their consultants running computer simulation programs, whose results have become gospel, even though the various weighting factors are a matter of considered judgement. These results are just statistical forecasts, and should be used only as guides, not as proven facts. Thus, the two corridors one along MN 55 and the other along Co Rd 11, that would provide the required high speed uncongested fast routes to the Twin Cities for the western cities and towns, have been dismissed by the consultants and the MinnDoT personnel. The choice of route should satisfy several ertiteria: 1) high speed service for the western towns, given the highest weight 2) minmal disruption to the local towns 3) cope with the locally generated traffic. pr-. r* ■ ^It seems that the options currently favoured by the consultants, i.e. Co Rd 6, South Bypass, and Existing corridor widened, do not meet criterion 2 above, while satisfying 1 and 3. MN 55 route satisfies 1 and 2 above, and Co Rd 11 route satisfies 1 and 3 above. If theMN 55 route is chosen, which is the logical choice by any account, then the local towns' traffic may be dealt with by widening the current US 12 corridor to a 4 lane road to Maple Plain or further, with speed limits and traffic lights, and by widening of Co Rd 6 to a 4-lane road from existing US 12 to MN 110 (from which cross road it is being widened to US 494 in any case). Whatever the choice, we should not under any circumstances accept a 500ft wide corridor for a freeway or expressway. If the primary need is to .service the western towns the MN 55 corridor should be the choice, and no other. Yours sincerely Anand Gopinath ^ . fc Sf "■p-h. I' w fi K.ffe-e\ •s;> P p? W W-' ^';.-• . i;I'S'. PW: •;m--p'.m- ifl:; i JOHN C. SKOGLUND June 24, 1991 JUL 1 7 1991 Dear Ms. Mabusth; I believe that the development of a Freeway or Expressway through the City of Orono is not acceptable. The resulting impact over time of increased traffic, development pressures and environmental impacts would violate Orono standards. These standards are set in the Orono Comprehensive Plan adopted by the City of Orono and the Metropolitan Council. The effects a Freeway or Expressway would have on our lakes, we^’ lands, woods, parks and general rural atmosphere would only be negative. We value our rural community. To maintain this, we are willing to pay the price of a lower level of service and speed through Long Lake on the current Highway 12 corridor. However, safety concerns on Hwy. 12 do need to be addressed. Viable alternatives exist for "through" traffic from the west, such as Hwy.55 which is already being considered for highway/freeway upgrades. Sincerely, John C. and Adelaide J. Skoglund Orono residents 1840 Fox Street Wayzata, MN. 55391 1‘: f i f' Ale» Dianne Jentilucci P O. Box 27 1295 Briar Street Crystal Bay. MN 55323 I- I • o July 25. 1991 To: Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusih. Building & Zoning Administrator Members of Orono City Council JUl 2 6 133^ Subject: Michael Hilbelink Application # 1666 Variance Renewal for 21 80 Prospect Avenue Dear Ms. Mabusth and Orono City Council This letter is to document the concerns we have regarding certain provisions of the above mentioned variance renewal application. We wish to thank you very much for removing this matter from the consent agenda of the Council meeting of July 22. 1991. and for hearing our concerns regarding this matter. The Council and staff have done a great |ob resolving drainage problems along our southern property lire. We wish to insure that work is not lost due to TechnicalitiesV A. The original variance #1502 was approved by Council resolution #2839 and contained specific wording that was not carried forward to the new resolution The specific wording appeared in resolution #2839, condition #€. page 3 of 5. as follows: Applicant shall maintain erosion control on his property throughout construction to prevent any restriction of drainage system along northern border of property. The existing drainage swale within the northern boutKlaries of the property shall not be moved further north so as to further encroach into the immediately adjacent property to the north. This wording should be included in the new resolution in order to maintain the intent of condition #6. imposed upon the original variance approval #2839 B. It appears that the position of the existing drainage swale referenced in "A" above is rx)t indicated in any document in the City's possession. The words in “A" above are not meaningful without a documented location of the swale. Perhaps this has already been done, and we are not aware ol it. If so. we would appreciate receiving a copy of such documentation or survey for our records. C. We have recently jecome aware that Mr. Hilbelink is not the owner of the property, nor is he empowered to sign legal documents on behalf of the owner We have concerns regarding the legality of recorded documents because they show Mr. Hilbelink as owner of the property. His Mter to the Council indicates, however, that ho is not the owner. The easements granted pursuant to resolution #2839 are of particular concern to us. We wonder how a party can grant easements on a property that he does not own at the time of execution of the document. Perhaps the City Attorney could shed some light on this question. D. When a vaHd easement is obtained, we wish to receive a copy of it for our records. We also would like to reiterate that the easement along the northern border of the property should be IS* as required in corKfition #5. of resolution #2839. submitted. ► t- .1■ I - - LAKH MINNF.rONKA CONSRRVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS agenda Regular Meeting. 7:30 pm. Wednesdiy . July Tonka B .i y City H . i 1 1 4901 Manitou Road (Couiit> Rd 19) 24 orr Cr CRC.V0 as Call to Order .JLLSoil Call Reading of Minutes — 6/26/91 Board Meeting Public CoMieots — From persons in attendance not on agenda oc Chair Announcements, Cochran 1. Public officials lake inspection tour of B/1/91 2. Hennepin Parks reception. Noerenberg Park. 6 pm 3. Additional announcements: last call: Thur. 7/25: Cowiittee Reports 7/15 91 B. Nelson residence, Stubbs Bay, staff detail review; LAKE USE, Chair Pillsbury A. Approval of minutes, meeting Special Events: 1) Special Event Fireworks Display, ecommending approval subject to 2) Consolidated Race Schedul e/Mi nne t onka Yacht Cl'- recommending approval to place temporary buoys 1 ng milfoil beds in Browns Bay and Nor?-, of Big Island ouring the Interlakes Regatta 8/1/91 - 8 .91 (area has been harvested since committee met on tnis request). 3) Deposit Refunds of $100 each rerommending approval for: a) Minnetonka Crossing. Windsurfing Event. 6/8/91 MN State Sheriff’s Assn. National Sheriff’s Fishing Classic. 6/18/91 American Scholarship Foundation Bass Fishing Tournament 6/16/91 Hennepin County Sheriff’s Water Patrol report: Additional business recommended by the committee: b) c) C. 0. HATER STRUCTURES. Chair Gr.ithwol A. Approval of minutes, meeting 7/13 91 Appointment of subcommittees as proposed Chair Crathwol: B.bv W.ater Structures 1) 2) 3) 4) License and permit foe review, chair Martinson Shoreline storage of 3 & 4 boats, chair Grathwol Procedures and policies review. ch.air Babcock Wetland inventory and policy review, chair Babcock MiriVftff filVifihimtfi-feirf -li IIW- F fii- t k ; IFr? f 'V t I y^. 1^: *v if «■ ilt V'i*. m ■^'1 ■ y • f : W'W fi > rK:, Board Agenda, 7/24/91, P. 2 C. Multiple Dock License Renewa. Applications: 3. 4. 5. I)Lakeside Marina, Maxwell Bay: recommending approval of current dock configuratjon. addition of 2 wide finger docks to wide body slips on the north side Sec. C, one on north side Sec. D, subject to receipt of a certified dimensioned as-built 'jock survey, and annual renewal of the east side setback vaa^iance. Gayle's Marina, Maxwell Bay: recommending approval subject to receipt of certified, dimensioned as—built dock survey. RDP Partners/Unper Lake Mtka Yacht Club, Spring Park Bay» recommending approval subject to provision of amenities per Order of 7/26/89. The Harborage Homeowners Assn, Smithtown Bay; recommend ing approval with a Temporary Low Water Variance to a total of 12A ' , and recommending approval of the Variance Order with the following addition (underlined) "A variance is granted from northeas t side setback requirements... Srjiff recommended to notify all multiple dock licensees with temporary low water variances that they be prepared to bring docks in to normal locations upon anticipating and retaining 928.0‘ water level for the 1992 season. SMVIRONMBNT, Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force, Chair Reese A. Operations progress, analysis of current conditions; B. Funding projections for continuation of '9l harvest program; C. LMLOA BWM Forum 7/15/91 outcome: D. Additional business recommended by the committee: I) Policy designating Eurasian Water Milfoil Weed Control Program project manager and executive director to take the {•0sponsibility for setting the milfoil cutting schedule, taking into consideration recommendations by board members, other responsible parties, recommending approval; ADVISORY COMMITTEE, Chair Rascop A. Outcome of revisions to combined Environmental and Shcreland Protection Chapters presented to cities 7/17; Mat Council notice to terminate funding of staff assistance beyond 9/4/91 e.xpiration of review period; Projection for completing balance of Management Plan revisions; Additional business; B FINANCIAL REPORTS, Treasurer Boswinkel A. S' '•■ement of Cash Transactions, month ending 6/30/91 B. AuUa«. of Vouchers for Payment C. First quarter financial report prepared in-house; 0. Additional business recommended by the Board; 6. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT, Strommen UNFINISHED BUSINESS ■flhkilhiar n e I fe„Iw. r-)- I’ 1''m U. V h ea; 7j"! •■• v ^- i'. , J" m W"-’* [-. . V . »vvk • A,- fi^ :i-;;'A P‘"^"s;; ’l-V' .V E'^r ./ \ * % ' K hv,. ■■ r'. Sr;- \[}0- i: LAKIi HlNNiiTONKA CONiSEKVATlOM DliJTKiCT Board of Directors Reptular MccbinR, Wednesday, Jur>o 26, IDDI Tonka Bay City Hall Call to Order: Tli<" in--rtirift wn^ called to order l)v Vl.;*> Chair Foster at 7:30 p.in. Roll Call: Members Present: Bert Foster, Vico Chair, Deopha%'en; dames Grathwol. Excelsior; Robert F’iilsbury, Minnetonka; Jan Boswinkel, Treasurer. Minnetonka Beach; Gcott Carlson. Minnetrista (arrived as noted); Thomas Reese, Mound; JoEllen Hurr, Orono; Robert Rascop, Shorewood; Douglas Babcock. Secretary. Spring Park (a^yj^ived as noted); Marvin Bjorlin. Tonka Bay; David Bartos, Victoria; Thomas Martinson. WaycaLa. (arrived as noted); Robert Slocum, Woodland. Also present. Charles LeFevere. Counsel; Rachel Thibault. Administrative Technician; Eugene Stronimen. Executive Director. Absent;: David Cochran, Chair, Greenwood. Reading of Minutes: Grathwol moved, Reese seconded, to the minutes of the 5/22/91 Beard meetinc as submitted, carried unanimously. approve Motion Public Comments: Tliere were no comments from attendance not on the agenda. persons Chair Announcements: Foster for Cochran 1. Proposed candidate subcommittee. serve on Conflict of Interest Foster reported Cochran submits the following candidates to B0yve on the Conflict oi Interest sub~committee• Robeit oeailes, former LMCD Chair and Board member: Gen Olson. State Senator and former Mayor, Minnetrista; Board members Hurr. Slocum. Boswinkel and Grathwol. Foster called for additional nominations. Theie were none. , u aGrathwol moved. B.iorlin seconded, to approve the members or the Conflict of Intere.st sub committee as submitted by Cochran. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Public Officials Lake Inspection Tour A show of hands indicated f.. urLeen r»*sei y.atiofis. including spouses, for the Fubi i>: Officials L \k^ In-sro-ctioji T-ur. Saturday, 8/3/91. Committee Reports ■ , • Babcock and Martins'.'U arrived d.iririg the following discus.sjon. 1 m I U. I' P ■t - ■c- mk ■t:H' ■7 LMCD Board of Directoris Juno 2t>, 1991 1. WATER GTRUCTUREG. Ch?ir Grntir.;ol A. Lakeside Marina. status on compliaii'.'o with Board CL>nditions of license renewal granted 5/22/91. The executivtj director submitted ■.‘•.•rre.spondcnce between the LMCD and Lakeside Max'tna from 5/23 l.hrougli 6/2U. alone with a memo to the Board commenting on tlie { r<.'gress toward completion of the licensing stipulations. The executive director noted the fencing and signage are complete. Custvi^mer parking at the deep well dock is causing conflict with the property to the west, making it necessary to add no parking signs on the west side. James Dunn, owner of the Lakeside Marina, said all of the under*water tru.sses have been removed, the docks are physically in to approximately 225' with the west wing finished and east wing to be finished by 6/28, A lot line survey is scheduled for 7/1. He said by 7/G everything should be in conformance with the LMCD requirements, In response to Foster’s question about the dry storage, Dunn said he is looking for an interpretation of what constitutes dry storage. A preliminary inventory of the marina boats on land taken by Dunn, indicates eight different types of storage. The executive director said dry storage means v/atercraft stored off the water and being placed in and out of the water vs. watercraft waiting to go into a slip, held for service, for sale, or to be taken to a different lucation. The boats meeting the dry storage definition add more watercraft to a marina operation over and above that allowed b.v licen.se. Such additional stox*age must meet special density license and dock license I'equirements. Gratliwol responded that the Board will be reviewing the definition. Dunn asked to be kept informed of that review. The executive director noted the exact dock configuration has not been verified as of this date. Dunn exhibited a a 1931 survey showing the 1908 changes. Dunn requests permission to substitute a 2’ walkway in place < f the piling system previously used. He said this will allow b. ats to be tied at four corners and will give greater stability by tying into the under-water trusses. Dunn also asked for permission for a 7' walkway on the gas dock because of the weight of the equipment. Foster moved, B.jorlin seconded, to refer the Lakeside Marina request for adding "finger” docks and a 7' walkway on the gas dock to the Water Gtiuictures committee. Motion carried unanimously. Hun* noted a 7’ walkway will require a variance, the maximum allowance being S'. Dunn asked that Hurr and Tliibault measure the final slip sizes to confirm compliance with the site plan. B• Gayle’s Marina Strommen reported repeated requests for a certified survey of the multiple docks at Gayle’s Marina liave been ignored. Grathwol stated the license is pending until the certified survey s received. Marina staff have reported serious health problems h«ive caused recent delays in responding to this requirement. p- kfN.' ? I' ■Item^'M'tea K #■ $>■ r ..t ife- ¥ i; LMCD Board of Directors June 26, 1991 Grathwol expressed c-.n :ern about a letter from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District implying Gayle’s Marina is profiting from an illegal act. Gtrommen responded that the LMCD litigation settlement for storage of barges did not involve use of the dredged area without :.t permit. Pillsbury called attention to the channel markings at Qajrle's Marina. The executive director reported it has been discussed with counsel, the DNR and Water Patrol. LeFevere commented that the structures are outside of the Dock Use Area. He observed that boats use them in approaching the gas dock and that there was a divided opinion among Board members o*. the lake inspection tour about their usefulness. LeFevere suggested this might be a subject for Committee discussion. C.License Renewals Pending Thibault reported the following: _ _ _ _ _ _ Marina Waiting for a certified survey. Har?'orage Homeowners Assjn They have an Order for a variance which is pending a certified re-survey. They also have applied for a temporary low water variance before water levels rose. RDP Partners/Upper Min.n^O.hH.!' Yacht (^lyb Their application ia ready for approval, but there is t»o building or dock or required amenities. No action required. 2. ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Chair Raseop James Uttley, Metropolitan Council, facilitator for the Management Plan, reported 11 communities have signed the Shoraland Grant Agreement. Greenwood, Wayaata and Oroiio have decided to proceed independently with MN DNR. Uttley said the DNR is organising the Technical Committee. An orientation meeting will be held in July to include the cities, LMCD, its consultant, Stove Prestin, and MN DNR officials. Uttley distributed a draft revision of a combination of the Shoreland Protection and Environmental Protection chapters of the Management Plan into one chapter. Among the changes made was to rewrite LMCD’s "objectives' as "policies'. New. moi*e specific objectives were then developed from these policies. There is no reference to Appendix "C" because by the time the Plan is adopted it will be after the fact to the citie.s' shoreland ordinances, Uttley concluded. Reese asked to see what was taken out of the two chapters. Uttley will furnish a copy showing tlie material omitted. ,, , , , Responding to Rascop’.s 'Question about timing. Uttley askocJ for an additional thirty day extension beyond the extension ending August 4. A tentative date of July 3. 7 p.m. was set for a meeting with the Board to review the above draft. A meeting with the cities willbo arranged fr-r July 17. rVF/ •i i-*. ;s^ ^■1 r^--'i-' ■•r. i,it -k rf--' r;>' /■%; - r‘.' r> '•’ irr .* \. '*• k.-- t : ' t iij t.’* f" ••■4: • LMCD Board of Di. roc Lor a Jane ilG, 1991 Uttley offered aji t Itornaliv-? *, • I'l-osentiiic the completed portion of the Plan to tiie Metropolitan Council. It is possible for the Council to appr<i»ve parts ol the f’lan. By doinf? that it will allow time to prepare the Meinoi'an'luni of Undei'standinR and start ne^otiat ionr. with tliC' •; i t L Foster moved. B.i”rlin so':<'’'ide'.l. tappr'.'ve an extension of thirty days from August 4 for Metropolitan Council review. Hotion carried unanimously. Uttley said the remaining chapter.s should be finished by the end of July. Anticipating that tii'ie table, Grathwol said it could be discussed in August and by the end of tlie thirty day extension a finished draft could be in the harid.s of the Hetropolitan Council. I.Ittley said at least a substantial part of the Plan will be completed. Grathwol commented that as time goes on situation.s are changing. Uttley added a section has been placed in the draft requiring all communities to l.uve a .sanitary SQW«^r system. IJttley pointed this out ti.* Wov.'dland s dii'ocLor, Bob Slocunit and invited a discussion with J’locum later" on the intent of this addition. Babcock asked about tlie status of the three independent communities as far as rep’re.sentation on the Technical Committee. Uttley said the DMK will invite them to attend the meetings. 3. ENVIRONMENT. Eurasian W.ater Milfoil Task Foz-oe. Chair Reese A. Operation E’rogresri. Ree.se reported tliat after nine days of operating an -average of f-*.i. 7 acres per day have been cut. That compare.*J t<» .'ui Mnih.icuiuetited 1 i t*’ U* .‘jcr'kcs per i.l'iy in 1990. If tiiat rate con Liiiu*:?., what t^'iok day.s <‘1 cuttln/? last year could bo completed in 37 tlays. Ihis remarkable progres.s is attributable largely to the use of the barge provided by Minnetonka Portable Dre<Jging. Inc. B. Funding Update. Reese rep-r-rted current and approved funds of $131, OUU. At the rate of t’ .ao-es per day the actual work cost estimate is $194;UUU. There is a need for an r'"tional $63,000 to meet the goal. Carlson arrived. C. Boswinkel commetited on the private operators cutting weeds and questioned who controls their <.>perations. (Tliey are under DNR regulation) R.asci.'p mentioned he saw a blue harvester transpor' d east on llwy 12, which had not been cleaned of weeds. , Reese said EWM h-as been identified in 39 lakes. Chemical treatment appears to be inconsistent. A private firm is testing some products on Lake Nlimel'.^nk-n. Reese reported a Univ*::rsi ty '.'f Mitiiiosota si- dy iridicate.s that harvesting does not stimulate EWM growth. The Board asked that a copy of the report be furnished to staff for inclusion in public relations inf'".'rination. D. The $2.'Xi sur*:harge on boat licen.se fees for exotic weed control has been pas.sed by the legi.s 1 a Lu)*e. Unfortunately they neglected to pass th*- .'ippi'op’riat imi. itAiiiirii kf.‘ LMCD Board of Directors June 26, 1991 L'^k'3 Minnetonka et.»ra:3ian water Log Theater in E. Reese sai'J he has been t':>id that the Lakeshore Owners Association will conduct a milfoil forum on 7/15 at 7:30 p.m. at the Old Greenwood. They have invited representatives cl the DNK, Freshwater Foundation and private operators to participate. F. Two Charter Boat operators have discussed a $100 a plate progressive dinner to help fund the EWH program. The executive director said he is not sure whether it will be held this year because of the time constraints. G. The Board commended the EV/H Task Force and the employees operating the program for th ir excellent work. 4. LAKE USE COMMITTEE. Chair rill.sbury A Pillsbury moved. Foster seconded, to approve the Lake Use minutes of their 6/17/01 meeting as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. , .• =B no obL Ions to LI 10 LciKo .>inrni LL^o s recommendation to move the southerly ‘‘slow" buoy at Seton Channel to a location between the two existing slow buoys, and to move the channel buoys further apart. , • i. Pillsbury moved. Foster seconded, to approve deposit refunds of $100 to the following; Freshwater Found.ation’.s J & B witli a Splash, 6/0 Minnetonka Boat Works’ Water Ski Show. tVl J. canceled. Minnetonka Bass Club’s Minnetonka E<ass Classic. 6/b Motion carried unanimously. D. The Water I’.'iLrol repre.s^ujtativi-* wa.s not present because of an emergency. Pillsbury presented the Water Patrol report as submitted at the Lake Use Committee meeting. E. The Committoo recommendation rcg.ardiiig increasing lines for boats exceeding the decibel limits was referred to st.alf to iiojfk with Attorney LeFevere f-ir a report. 5. FINANCIAL REPORTS. Treasurer Boswinkel A Rascop moved. Hurr seconded, to approve the Statement of Cash Transactions, month ending b/31/91. as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. B. Audit of Vouchers for Payment Babcock asked about the $344.00 payment to Ernest C. Blanchard for T-Shirts. The executive director said hey were shirts remaining from a Freshwater Foundation milf«3ii -'romotioii. imprinted with "LHCD Save the Lake". Each EWM three to wear as uniforms. Babcock asked^ about the *^7 • payment to Office Products for maintenance of the memory writer. The executive director stated the chirgo covered repair of the equipment and a year’s maiiitenanc*-* cigreement. Babceok suggested exploring the possibility of purciiasing a used memory writer as back up,since the enuJpment value is no longer worth the service costs. ps. EiMCD Board of Directors June 26, 1991 Boswinkel moved, Rascop seconded, to approve bills Checks <*6913 through K6969 in the amount ot Motion carried unanimously. payment of $17,787.15. C. 1991 Annual Budget Review j The Board received city responses to the preliminary arart of the 1992 budget forwarded to the cities on May 31. Reese, Carlson. Foster and Rascop indicated their respective cities have discussion of ho« to resend positively to the communities that expressed concerns about various facets of the draft budget without affecting the '"‘••RiiL°L«3.‘’5u?r«co„d.d. to chsnge the EWM Program City Contributions from S80.000 to $63,000. with Private Solicitation to be $17,000. Motion carried, Carlson, Slocum and Babcock voting^n^y^^^^^^ Bjorlin seconded, to reduce the LMCD Communities Administrative Levy by 1% (to A% over 1991 budget) the to be made up by revenue from Licenses and Permits. Motion Qrathwol stated the fee schedule for licenses and permits mill be reviewed by the Water Structure Committee. A Reese moved, Bjorlin seconded, to reduce the Office & Administrative from a 6% increase to 5%. the executive make the necessary adjustments to maintain a balanced budg t. Motion carried, Boswinkel and Grathwol voting nay. budeet The executive director distributed a draft budget transmittal letter for the Board’s approval. The Board approved the letter with the deletion of the second sentence on page ^ regarding the use of excess funds. 6. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT, Strommen The executive director reported the first and second quarter financial report is being prepared in-house and will be ready in There will be some extended time for the bookkeeper in the office as personnel go on vacation. Mm BUSINESS screening at the dam. Motion carried unanimously. B’y Marina litigation. 7—n.<• . .^ > .V- fe-.',i« fev-'.r ^ ‘ i/- r LMCD Board of Ulroctors ADJOURNMENT Th« meeting was declared adjourned at 10:25 p.m June 26. 1991 David Cochran, Chaii* w^ ^ ‘ *v v’te-‘te' X‘ri?>-' •'r^?f':w rv ' .r f m--- p-^^' 1». 'iM, 02”'' K;'':' f LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Action Report: Meeting• Water Structures and Environment Committee Saturday, July 13, 1991, 7:30 a.m. Norwest Bank Building Waysata, Community Room Members Present Chairt Excelsior; Bert Foster, Deephaven; James Grathwol, vnaj.IT, David Cochran, Greenwood; Robert Pillsbury, Minnetonka: Thomas Reese, Mound; JoEllen Hurr, Orono; Marvin BJorlin. Tonka Bay; David Bartos, Victoria. Also present: Rachel Thibault, Administrative Technician; Eugene Strommen, Executive Director. The meeting was called to order by Grathwol at 7:30 a.m. ENVIRONMENT Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force Report, Chair Reese 1. Operations Progress A. Weed growth rate and effect on schedule T continued rise in the lake level has kept most of the weed growth from reaching the surface, compared to 1990 at this time, Reese reported. As a result tlie Imrvo.stitig operation ceased starting July 3. An aerial survey on 7/12 showed there are few places on the Lake where weed growth has surfaced. Project Manager Ted Haro, Strommen, Reese and Bill Niccum, Minnetonka Portable Dredging, reviewed the weed conditions and agreed to resume cutting on 7/17 in Brown's Bay. It is Reese s observation that the crew needs more guidance in their cutting procedure to avoid leaving so many uncut swaths. This was evident in aerial viewing of the areas cut. Reese stated there will be no harvesting unless the weeds are on the fj**"*?^®* Foster suggested that run-off from the rains has reduced the lake clarity, retarding the weed growth. 2. Funding Progress Reese reported private funding has reached $48,000. The Lake Minnetonka Lakeshore Owners Association will * nilfoil panel discussion on Monday,July 15. 7 p.m. at the Old g Theater. Reese, along with representatives from several agencies fiiil participate in a question and answer session. 3. Additional Business p:;i Foster said milfoil at Diamond Reef is interfering with o/5ui ” h./. volunteered to put out buoys to mark the area of approximately 20 acres. Reese responded the schedule h-as already been set. The Committee debated the merits of holding to a rigid schedule vs. Iiurvesting an area which has heavy public use. ^9\J. i I '.Vii P' ff-im r«:‘ I , - V '! . ■ #■ my ^ 0-’ t*tl-; I'vv?.m i® WvP--' Si- P ifeirv ; fa; % -V -r'PP"-' W»fern; M»y- ■ \- ■' f ■4'’- Walter S'bructures and Environment Coounittee July 13. 1991 dayGrathwol moved, Pillsbury seconded, to spend one~half liarveating at Diamond Reef before proceeding to Brown’s Bay. Bjorlin moved, Hurr seconded, to amend the motion to wait until the weeds are on the surface before harvesting. The motion to amend failed, 3 ayes, 5 nays. The original motion failed, 4 ayes and 4 nays. Foster was excused. Bartos moved, Hurr seconded, to recommend that the project manager and executive director are ultimately responsible for the milfoil cutting schedule, and that any Board member can request a changeI with the project manager and executive director making ^he final decision on any changes they see necessary. There were 6 ayes and 1 abstentation. Motion carried. Th^ 0xocutivo director conun©n'ted that he and Maro will work within the guidelines of efficiency, suggestions and available information. WATER STRUCTURES 1. Public Hearing Report: A. Nagel Setback Variance, 21895 Byron Circle, St. Albans Bay, Greenwood ^ ^ ^ ^ . The committee received the report of the 5/22/91 Public Hearing and Findings on the Variance application of Terrance and Jill Nagel to allow a permanent dock with a canopy with less than the 20* setback as required for a canopy, a 10' setback required without a canopy. . , , In stating his case, Nagel said he had a previous dock and oanopy that were removed because of their deteriorating condition. In placing the new dock and canopy he tried to avoid infringing on the Saucier property (21915 Minnetonka Blvd.) and Parris property (21865 Byron Circle). The dock presently overlaps the extended side site line of the Parris property by 3 without the added finger for the canopy. The executive director ndvised the committee of receipt of a letter from Parris, objecting to any encroachment of his DUA. .w u Nagel noted that Saucier does not meet the 20 side setback for a canopy at their lot line. The executive director stated Saucier was given a permit in 1985 for a permanent dock but there was no mention of a canopy. He said the Saucier dock does encroach on Nagel’s Dock Use Area. A canopy for Saucier a dock ffould b© subject to a variance provision. Grathwol said Saucier should be advised of this. * .j 4.^Hurr reconunended the minimum variance be granted to alleviate the hardship. In summary of the discussion and the hardship of converging lot lines being experienced by Nagel in gaining access, Grathwol observed that a Dock Use Area can be developed to allow baucior to keep her dock where it is and to allow Nagel to have his dock where it is. Canopies are another matter to be reviewed separately. -* • .... .. f; : Si^IS;::tvni^;r ■ p--v.w i"- P- - '4M- r •■■ :«■ p-m. 'M; my Wa'ter Structures and Environment Committee Juiy 13, 1991 Hurr moved,Bjorlin seconded, to refer to the staff for preparation of proposed solution to the variance for the Nagel property which would allow the Nagel and Saucier docks on a perpendicular extension along the lines presently shown on the amended survey, with an agreement on the canopies to be reached between Nagel and Saucier. The motion carried unanimously. Mr. Parris and Saucier are to be notified this will be an agenda Item at the August 10 committee meeting. In response to Nagel’s question. Grathwol confirmed that granting of a variance remains with the property upon a future sale. The executive director mentioned the need for a certified s^ryqy to include dock locations of the Saucier and Parris properties. Nagel objected to the cost of a certified survey^but will have a scaled site plan prepared by Schipke Engineers. Some committee members questioned the need for a certified survey. Hurr urged the committee to support staff when a recommendation is made. 2. Multiple Dock Licensees A. Lakeside Marina, Maxwell Bay, Orono Hurr moved, Bjorlin seconded, to recommend approval of the Lakeside Marina license including addition of the 2* wide finger docks being added to the 5 wide body slips on the north side of Section C and one wide body slip on the north side of Section D, including the annual renewal of the east side set back variance, and provision of a certified dimensioned survey of the new floating dock configuration, all slips being numbered. The motion carried unanimously. quos'tion^d th© status of foam dock fraginantatxon. StrMunen noted this is on the calendar for evaluation. Dunn offarad reference to an annual seminar at the University of Wisconsin. Madison. regarding dock designing, which proper use of foam and how to maintain its durability. installation and arrangements during winter storage are prevent foam fragmentation. Surface sealing is also Dunn noted. includes Proper key to helpful, Bjorlin was excused. B reco Gayle's Marina multiple dock license renewal application, mending approval subject tot 1) Receipt of certified dock survey 2) Removal of posts marking channel to gas dock Hurr moved, Grathwol seconded, to recommend approval of the multiple dock license renewal for Gayle's Marina, subject to receipt of a certified dock survey. Motion carried unanimously. Thibault reported that Gayle’s staff requested advice for an alternate method of identifying the channel to the gas pump. Denis Bailey, Hennepin County Lakes Improvement Section, will be %o chock ‘tho chonnol posts snd surrounding water depths to make a recommendation as to whether marking this channel is necessary. Hater Structures and Environment Committee July 13, 1991 ■itr- '•i. '/ ■ i»T'' ■ Pf\i} 'W'Arli,mr- P 8« C. RDP Partners/Upper Lake Minnetonka Yacht Club multiple dock license renewal application. Hurr moved. Reese seconded, to recommend approval of the RDP Partners/Upper Lake Minnetonka Yacht Club multiple dock license subject to providing amenities per Order of 7/26/09. Motion carried unanimously. D. The Harborage Homeowners Association multiple dock license renewal application. Bartos moved, Pillsbury seconded, to approve the Harborage Homeowners Association multiple dock license renewal application, with a Temporary Low Water Variance to 124’ total and Variance Order with the addition to the Order specifying the HE side setback. Motion carried unanimously. The 34’ extension to 124’ total, was installed before the water level rose above 920.0’. Grathwol moved, Hurr seconded, to recommend that staff write a letter to all holders of temporary low water variances, mdvising them the Board will probably not declare 1992 a low water year. The licensees are to prepare to bring their docks back to their normal location and configuration in 1992. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Chairman Report A. Committee priorities and appointment of subcommittees Qrathwol recommended the following steps to be taken by the committee in order to accomplish certain goals before the end of the new multiple dock moratorium in January 1992: 1. Authorize a subcommittee - Chair Martinson. To review license and permit fees and report a new schedule ad.iusting fees ^0 reflect current practice and coats to the District. Reporting date 9/13/91. Hurr offered to serve on the subcommittee. 2. Authorize jx subcommittee - Chair Grathwol. To review staff inventory of 3 and 4 boat docks and report enforcement procedure and amendment of existing Ordinances. Reporting date 10/12/91. (This subcommittee will assume the basic 1 boat per 50* rule will continue in effect). 3. Authorize ^ subcommittee - Chair Babcock. To review administrative procedure as reflected in Ordinance and practice to simplify and authorize, as possible, administrative resolution of routine matters involving variance, temporary low water, multiple dock and commercial marina, and dock placement and construction and other issues as needed and report procedures, policies, and amendment of existing Ordinance. Reporting date 11/8/91. Hurr and Bartos offered to serve on the subcommittee. 4. Authorize a " Chair Babcock. To review staff inventory of wetlands to determine total shoreline miles of wetland as compared to total shoreline miles and recommend pi^iiiniiiery policies and amendments to existing protect significant wetlands by limiting construction. Reporting date 1/10/92. ordinances to dredging and '.fV tfa'ter S'tructures and Gnvironmont Commibtoe July 13. 1991 I*"’- • • wi ■r ■ ter- ^ jYr 7'*• ' ■ ii v’’-' !.,f’ • ■ Ir-i'-'t : Vtj^. •: M:-Ik m'--: r SiTfft te'-iff ■ dilrr... . Hurr moved. Pillsbury seconded, to recommend appx-oval of the subconunittees as set forth by Chair Grathwol. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Additional Business A. Fragmentation from styrofoam docks Hurr reported that Gabriel Jabbour, Orono Councilmember, has asked the Orono staff to look into the problem of styrofoam fragmentation. When the report is available LMCD will obtain a copy. B. LMLOA Panel Discussion As a participant in the LMLOA panel discussion on 7/15/91, Reese said he will be asked to comment on funding for milfoil control. He will suggest legislative approval of a recreational boating fee for use of the Lake. Grathwol suggested he include in his remarks a distinction between the current funding and the racoanendations of the Management Plan. The executive director said the audience should be aware that tl.is proposed milfoil control funding would be in combination with that of the 14 cities, other agencies, and private contributions. C. LMCD Cost Reimbursement - Bowers Variance Xhe executive director reported that an initial review of staff time and legal fees in the amount of approximately $1,800 were incurred by LMCD during the Bowers variance application considerations. The committee advised these costs should be billed to the applicant. 5. Adjournment The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 10 a.m. FOR THE COMMITTEE: Eugene Strommen, Executive Director James Grathwol, Chair ■ V I k-s' •k’’ S'- ‘•' ■* i'-' r .1.'* ■ A;, g LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Action Report:Lake Use Committee Meeting:Monday, July 15, 1991, 4:30 p.m. Norwest Bank Waycata, Community Meeting Room Haabers Present: Bert Foster, Vice Chair, Deephaven; James Grathwol. Excelsior; Robert Pillsbury, Chair. Minnetonka; Marvin BJorlin, Tonka Bay. Also present: Bud Miller, Fishing Consultant, Deputy Schmidt, Sheriff's Water Patrol; Rachel Thibault, Administrative Technician; Eugene Strommen, Executive Director. The meeting was called to order by Pillsbury at 4:30 p.m. A. Adjustments to Slow Buoys The Committee tabled to the next meeting discussion of changes in alow buoys at Skogbergs Point, West Arm, and at North Arm pending a physical on-site inspection of the area. in and aroundB, Discussion of Bogs Fracturing and Floating Tonka Bay public docks. The channel in Tonka Bay bordered by Woodpecker Ridge and Crabapple Lane adjacent to Gideons Bay has been clogged floating bogs for about a month or more. These bogs have resulted from the vegetation break-up due to the higher water levels. Initially Minnetonka Portable Dredging has been engaged by Hennepin County Lakes Improvement Section to pick up large bog sections escaping the channel to Gideons Bay. Only a few been of a size and problem to require their pick up. Smaller pieces have drifted to various sliore locations. At the request of the Tonka Bay city administrator, LMCD has made its shore Conv^yoJT 8V®ilAbl® to r^^fnov© tli© bogs from tho bacli chann©! ©r©©i a memorandum completed to specify the terms of use. The city is still pondering the best way to handle the situation. Homes on Crabapple Lane in particular have their docks frequently clogged to the point of being unnavigablc. Bjorlin is working closely with the city to resolve the problem. C. Special Events 1. Application for a Fireworks Display for the Nelson wedding on 8/3/91. 11:15 p.m. on Stubbs Bay at the Carlson Compound. The application indicates a professional fire works operator will supervise traffic on the Lake. > Foster moved, Grathwol seconded, to reconunend approval ox the fire works display as detailed in the application of Dr. Mrs. Glen Nelson, subject to a satisfactory response to LHCD - continued “i !)• -•aV ' f ; . > -^'*- iia-./; -■■ :ji i ■: Im #■ ijf' .•T V ■"■*» ^ ,rCV ij'- V"p-%. |fe LJ'fr,>- !#a!' e^5-’K; # ■" ■" -.' ' .r‘ •^’ iiils'ir' .kfife’- ■■ >4 . Lake Use Committee July 15« 1991 staff obtaining information from the fire works people as to height of the trajectory and distance of barge from shore and what precautions are taken to protect the safety of the public. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Consolidated Race Schedule/ Minnetonka Yacht Club Foster moved, Grathwol seconded, to recommend approval of temporary buoys to mark milfoil beds in Browns Bay and North of Big Island during the Interlakes Regatta 8/1 -8/4/91. Placement of the buoys to be up to the discretion of the applicant. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Deposit Refunds Foster moved, Bjorlin seconded, to recommend approval of the following $100. deposit refunds: Minnetonka Crossing Wind Surfing Event 6/8 Minnesota State Slieriff’s Association National Sheriff’s Fishing Classic 6/18 American Scholarship Foundation Bass Fishing Tournament 6/16 Motion carried unanimously. D. Water Patrol Report Deputy Schmidt x*eported the following: * A drowning in Cook’s Bay. A 1-1/2 year old fell from a dock. ♦ A near drowning in Jennings Day. A woman fell from a dock and was resuscitated by the Water Patrol. ♦ Thirty-three BWIs have ’^^^en issued, somewhat below last yemr’s count at this time. The Water Patrol notices an increase in the number of boaters using a designated driver. ♦ Schmidt noted an increase in the return of high powered boats to the Lake. This is likely a result of higher water. ♦ There is an increase in boat vandalism and theft of boat contents. The Water Patrol is increasing shore line patrols. S. Resident Complaints Thibault reported receiving complaints about private docks imdmr water in the owner’s Dock Use Area. In some cases only the p^pma or posts are exposed.. The executive director said they mill review the complaints on a case by case basis. Consideration will be given as to whether they are a hazard to navigation. F. Adjournment Pillsbury declared the meeting adjourned at 4:55 p.m. FOR THE COMMITTEE Eugene Strommen. Executive Director SBiiasiai Robert Pillsbury, Chair a i-it 55'- > EFI iS'- I® ■Kv ^u:-v. T .■■-> -i--: '»• - j'..'. Ill ii'”iw ' y W'rm-'- S>i ■ t. m 0-jr.m. X-:: ; ^‘ - C ,-- pfe SjV ^''i®" ^#'-!" ■. ■ Ki.® te- fe.M'i-miu’^ ftp. ’ • . ;; 5iil* LAKE HINNBTONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT WATER STRUCTURES & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE AGENDA 7:30 an. Saturday, August 10. 1991 iP Norwest Bank Bldg, 900 E Wayzata Blvd, Rm l^S (Elavator ac«. ss for handicapped, use west entr nee. Wayzata Blvd)AUG ENVIRONMENT Burasian Water Milfoil Task Force. Chair Reese 1. Operations progress and current status: Financial condition and funding status: Additional business: 2. 3. WATER STRUCTURES Macal Sat Back Variance Application, St. Alban’s Bay, Oraanwood; continued, recommending publishing a new notice of publi hearing which informs adjacent dock owners that their dock use area may be adjusted: 2. Bxcelsior Park Tavern. Excelsior Bay, Excelsior: Public Hearing Report and Findings on Amenity Review: raeosimending staff and chair meet with applicant: 3« Gayle's Marina multiple dock license renewal - progress on eartifiad dimensioned as~buiit dock survey and review of NCWD resolution: assessment of channel posts placed in and beyond the dock use area: 4, Sub-committee report on license and permit fee study. Chair Martinson: S* Sub-committee report on policies and procedures. Chair Babcoek: 6* Staff report on inventory of 3-4 boat storage at docks: sat aubcommittee meeting for week of 8/12/91: 7. Staff report on multiple dock license inspections: 8, Additional business recommended by the committee; 8/2/91 P O P H A M H A I K J400 0«l r*»0» CtMTf • 1 100 ••VCMtttMTM trm c T octivco. covooAoe ooaoi Ttk<»MOiia ioa-ooa*iioo ▼■kicooiao >09-0011194 MNOOniCM Ol K au FMAS. ltd . MiMNCAPOLlO. Min NC ®SSSJ 4fOOCl«?OU9t riMAMClAi, CiMfca IO00.t.>tCOM0 0r9ttr MlAOf. fkOMlOA »1 >1 ttkOOOOWt loo-oio-oooo TtOiOOOlOO 900-010 0090 tovid A. Jofi«t» Etq« OlfOCt Dial (612) 334-2669 JUU u mi:ir^vc 1 Sjt te-■■' .•i#.tev mr- ^ t-' --- p H ■> SEPA:' :'Wi';. itsF ■I r.> ;. mll"- jr,.-*/ -(:*■•rv' ly.: July 24, 1991 Barbara Peterson, Mayor CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Gayle's Marina Dear Mayor Peterson: its regularly scheduled meeting of July 18, 1991, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District adopted the enclosed Resolution which finds Gayle's Marina in violation of District rules arising fron dredging activities performed on or about April 14 and 15, 1990. Since Gayle's Marina is located within your City, the Board of Managers thought you would want to know about this most recent violation of MCWD rules. Very truly yours. 'r-. . NDavid A. Jones Enclosure cc:Board of Managers, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Ron Quanbeck, P.E. James Mahady, P.E. Thomas J. Barrett, City Attorney Mark Bernhardson, City Manager 768P03WPPE h; 11 v>. rf-' 3 ■f- f:w 'Jf' rh. W‘ K-If ’^■■3h P ■Ifi' ?«-■ te:ir^ ff C’;:;, f J-': ,.- f " k I?wft' If !•'wI-'.- Ip. RESOL^mON MINNEHAHA CREEK V‘..TERSHED DISTRICT A RESOLUTION FINDING GAYLE'S MARINA IN VIOLATION OF DISTRICT RULES ARISING FROM DREDGING ACTIVITIES PERFORMED ON OR ABOUT APRIL 14 and 15, 1990. MHEREAS on or about April 14, 1990, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District ("MCWD") officials received complaints concerning dredging activities being conducted in Lake Minnetonka at Gayle s Marina; and MHEREAS MCWD officials investigated these complaints and observed dredging activity being conducted at Gayle's Marina on the morning of April 15; and MHEREAS officials of the Department of Natural Resources ("DNR") and MCWD conducted subsequent onsite inspections of the area or Lake Minnetonka in question; and MHEREAS the DNR in April of 1991 undertook a survey of the area of Lake Minnetonka in question; and MHEREAS in light of the observation of MCWD officials, information gathered by MCWD staff and the results of the DNR . Board of Managers set a public hearing District'^Rulel-testimony concerning apparent violations of the District s Ru , and MHEREAS due to the unfortunate events involving the wittig family at the regularly scheduled June 20, 1991, meeting of the Board of Managers; and include any written comments received within seven (7) days of the completion of the hearing. MOM THEREFORE, the Board of Managers of the MCWD, based upon the ?^tiSn/and ih^record compiled by staff and officially before the Board, does hereby find as follows: 1.Dredging activity was conducted on or about April 14 and 15 in Lake Minnetonka at Gayle's Marina; 2.These activities were conducted by individuals under the control of Gayle's Marina; 3.No application was made by Gayle’s Marina to the MC^ for a dredging contractor license nor was one issued; 4.No application was made to the MCWD for a permit authorizing the dredging activity nor was such a permit issued; 5.The dredging resulted in the creation of a channel for which neither the DNR or MCWD had issued previous permits; and 6.roSte?ials'*iere^LpSlited**in"th^ lakebed and within the flood plain. The MCWD further finds that these activities resulted in the following violations of MCWD by Gayle’s Marina: 1.Btile E/Dredoino: by virtue of dredging without first obtaining a dredging permit; 2. erosion and increased sedimentation in Lake Minnetonka, 3.K/Dredalna Contractor Licenses- ^ Conducting dredging activities without first obtaining a dredging license; 4.Pula c/FTnndplain Alteration: by virtue of altering the flood plain through the disposal of spoil material within the flood plain; 5.p..l« D/Wetl.nrt Alteration: by virtue of placing spoil material within protected waters; and 6. material without obtaining the required Dis.rict permit. The Board of Managers further finds that Gayle’s Marina is aware of the District’s Rules in general and Rule E, which governs dredoina activity in particular, having made application to the SSS’JS? IScii p.™us‘^?n the past. In light of this history, the action of Gayle’s Marina must be judged as an intentional violation of MCWD Rules. Adopted this 18th day of July, 1991. t1WU(82) -2- j If-i MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 15, 1991 ATTENDANCE 7:00 P.M. The Orono Planning Conunission met on the above date with the following members present: Planning: «—-mmission Chair Charlie Kelley and Planning Commission Members Jeffrey Johnson, Maureen Bellows, Ed Cohen, Candace Rowlette and Sara Moos. Charles Schroeder arrived at 7:09 p.ro. The following represented the City Staff: Building and Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and City Recorder Scheffler. Councilmember Jabbour was also present. Kelley called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. (#1)ZONING FILE #1661-SAMUEL MCCLOUD RECORD LOTS 16 I 22, BIG ISLAND SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT-CLASS I Carter DeLaittre, Attorney, was present on behalf of Samuel McCloud. Kelley opened the Public Hearing at 7:00 p.m. Gaffron displayed a survey depicting the parcels involved with Mr. McCloud's application, and summarized the issues pertaining to the requested subdivision as outlined in his July 9, 1991 memo. Gaffron stated that he views Mr. McCloud's request as an opportunity to clean up several unfinished matters pertaining to these parcels. There were no comments or concerns on behalf of the public, and Kelley closed the Public Hearing at 7:03 p.m. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Bellows, to recommend that Council approve the Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement, subject to the appropriate lot combinations taking place, and that lots 70 and 71 be considered as substandard, unbuildable record lots. All voted aye. Motion carried. (f2)ZONIMG FILE «1663-MARK JOHNSON 4465 BAYSIDE ROAD PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION Mark Johnson was present. Kelley opened the Public Hearing on this matter at 7:37 p.m. He stated that in light of the issues involving this property that have yet to be resolved (see Jeanne Mabusth's July 8, 1991, memo), this application should be tabled. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Kelley, to table application 11663 until such time that the issue of duplex use violation has been resolved, and septic testing, confirming suitable area for principal and alternate on-site septic systems, has been done. All voted aye. Motion carried. - 1 - :|lr- W-\ ... ’ ,• • ;-■ .. . •. ir'*f 'r-fv-^?>'.:-v... i' I' M.**' « ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 15, 1991 (#3A)ZONING FILE #1659-BIG ISLAND, INC. RECORD LOTS 12 « 19, BIG ISLAND VACATION OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY Ralph Hatch, a representative for present. Big Island, Inc., was The Public Hearing was convened by Kelley at 8:10 p.m. Mabusth noted that she had spoken to a representative of the DNR, who advised that they concurred with the Vacation, based on the ownership pattern and the fact that the property is located in a 5-acre Zoning District. Kelley closed the Public Hearing at 8:12 p.m., as there were no public concerns or comments pertaining to this application. It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Cohen, to recommend that Council approve the Vacation of an unimproved dedicated right-of-way as proposed. All voted aye. Motion carried. (i3B)£OHING FILE 11606-BIG ISLAND, INC. RECORD LOTS 12 1 19, BIG ISLAND, INC. CONDITIONAL OSE PERMIT-CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING Continuation of the Public Hearing on this application began at 8:26 p.m. Mabusth summarized the various issues outlined in her July 5, 1991 memo. She noted that, in terms of the number of persons that may use the facility at any given time. Big Island Inc., will be subject to the same ordinance controls as Big Island Vets Camp. Attendance is limited to a user level in relation to total area, and not total membership to total area. No more than 100 persons may use the facility at the same time. In the event that should occur, it will be necessary for Big Island, Inc., to obtain a large assembly permit. Ralph Hatch advised that shareholders. He said, "I Father's Day, and we were the high intensity of use. The Memorial Day, Labor Day, and are approximately 75 people, number of persons that attend on a reservation basis.” Big Island, Inc., currently has 38 took my family to Big Island on only people there. There is not a facility receives the most use on the Fourth of July, and then there We have the ability to control the those functions because it is done Kel 'Sked if the City has any method of enforcement. Mab<. Ivised that there have been no problems in the past with the use of this facility, due mainly to the fact that it is accessible by boat only. Kelley suggested that Mr. Hatch should make all 38 - 2 - i. &■. . ivf •r •'» ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 15, 1991 .(#3B)ZONING FILE 11606-BIG ISLAND, INC., CONTINUED shareholders aware of the 100 person limit. Hatch advised that there will be a stockholders meeting on the 22nd of July, and each member will be advised of the regulations. Mabusth referred to a letter that had been received from Debra Page, Attorney for Mr. and Mrs. Erickson, Big Island property owners. She stated that the letter calls out three items that she felt should be conditions of approval. One of the items mentioned is the issue of fire rings and barbecue pits. Mabusth asked Hatch if such items exist. Hatch replied, "We have one fire pit that sits high on the hill behind the fence area, just east of the volleyball court. That is the only fire pit on the premises." Mabusth stated that the same fire protection required for Big Island Vets Camp will have to be provided in this case. She said, "It is not appropriate to have fire extinguishers on a seasonal island property stored outside, but the method of fire protection for the Ver's camp, utilizing sand pails, blankets, and water barrels, may be more appropriate in this case as well." Hatch advised that there are a number of fire extinguishers within the residence/club house. Mabusth stated that Ms. Page has also requested that the City be advised of all changes in membership that occur with an amendment of the Big island, Inc., By-laws. Hatch sale "That is agreeable to us, and we have already discussed that and it will be on the agenda for the Board of Directors meeting." Mabusth asked Mr. Hatch if he had received a copy of Ms. Page's letter. Hatch indicated that he had received a copy of the letter. Kelley also discussed the need to maintain the number of slips to 15, and suggested that be added as a condition of approving the Conditional Use Permit. There were no comments from the public regarding this application, and Kelley closed the Public Hearing at 8:32 p.m. It was moved by Johnson, seconded by Rowlette, to recommend that Council approve a Conditional Use Permit for Seasonal Recreational Use for Big Island, Inc. All voted aye. Motion carried. - 3 - n w*- mm ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 15, 1991 (f3C)ZONING FILE #1660-BIG ISLAND, INC. RECORD LOTS 12 « 19, BIG ISLAND, INC. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE-PUBLIC lEARING Kcllsy opsn©d th© Public Hoaring 'mi this matter at 8.12 p.m. Hatch provid©d a large aerial photograph of the area, showing the swinuning dock location. He explained that the dock is mainly used as a place for parents to sit and watch their children that are swinuning. The shoreline is extremely rocky and that the more flat, less rocky elevations are 15 to 20 feet above the shoreline. The dock provides quick, safe access to young children in swimming. There were no public comments regarding this application, and Kelley closed the Public Hearing at 8:18 p.m. It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to recommend that Council approve a hardcover Variance for Big Island, Inc., to repair an existing swimming dock/deck, provided that the structure not exceed its existing size. Motion, Ayes-6. Johnson, Nay. Motion carried. Johnson stated that recommending approval of a deck within the 0-75 foot setback area may set a negative precedent. («4)ZONING FILE #1646-TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH 2060 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-CONTINUAT4.ON OF PUBLIC HEARING Jerry Jones, an authorized representative for Lutheran Church, was present. Trinity At 7:05 p.m., Kelley continued the Public Hearing on this matter, and asked Mabusth to make her opening comments. Nabusth advised that at the June 17, 1991 Public Hearing on this application, a resident expressed concern about the proposed outdoor lighting at the door on the north side. She explained that since that time, she received additional information regarding the light, indicating that it will not be used for security purposes. The light will be indirect, and turned on only when the facility is being used. There were no additional comments from the public regarding this application, and Kelley closed the Public Hearing at 7:07 It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Johnson, to recommend tnac Council approve a Conditional Use Permit for church use, specifically involving a storage building and additional lighting. All voted aye. Motion carried. (Planning Commissioner Schroeder arrived at this point in the meeting.) - 4 - IK - • ;y,rI ?■ p ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 15, 1991 and the Public (#5)ZONING FILE #1647-GERALD BENOIT 3403 EASTLAKE STREET VARIANCES-CONTINOATION OF PUBLIC HEARING Kelley noted Gerald Benoit's presence, Hearing on this natter reconvened at 8:35 p.m, Gaffron provided a brief overview of the issues involved with Mr. Benoit’s application for setback and hardcover Variances and a Conditional Use Permit (see Michael Gaffron's June 11, 1991 memo). He displayed and explained the proposals as shown in sketches labeled "Option A", and "Option B", noting that Staff is recommending "Option E" With Benoit if 1987. respect to the flood plain issue, Kelley asked Mr. his property experienced flooding during the storm of Benoit indicated that he did not purchase the property until 1989. Gaffron stated that he does not recall a time when the creek overflowed while he has been employed with the City of Orono. He advised however, that he had contacted the DNR and Minnehaha Creek Watershed in light of the fact that flooding could occur. He said, "DNR and watershed District advise that they would probably issue a permit as long as the garage slab is placed above the flood plain elevation, or at the 935 elevation. Gaffron stated that the previous owner of the property used a pipe to discharge laundry water directly into the creek. Gaffron advised that Steve Weckman, thf. City's Septic Inspector, is in the process of investigating that. He asked Mr. Benoit if he is aware of the pipe, and whether it is still being used. Benoit indicated that he was not aware of the pipe. Kelley asked Benoit for his opinion regarding Staff’s recommendation to proceed with "Option B". Benoit stated that he had no objection to using Option B. Johnson asked Benoit if he had given any consideration to constructing an attached garage. Benoit advised that he preferred to have a detached garage, and had not given any consideration to attaching it to the house. Bellows noted that, given the age of the existing house, and the condition of the footings or foundation of the house, attaching the garage may not be a wise thing to do. Gaffron added that attaching the garage to the house would - 5 - '■K fSlii-' ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 15, 1991(#5)ZONING FILE 11647-BENOIT CONTINUED not alleviate the need for setback Variances. There were no public comments regarding this application, and, at 8:42 p.m., Kelley closed the Public Hearing. It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Moos, to recommend that Council approve front, side street, and hardcover Variances, as outlined under Staff's Option B, as well as a Conditional Use Permit, allowing work to be done in the flood fringe area, subject to minimum garage slab elevation of 935,0', and any further conditions that may be imposed by the Watershed District. It is further recommended that approval of this application be subject to removal of any potential septic system discharge conduits. Rowlette asked if the issue of septic system and holding tanks needed to be addressed in conjunction with this application. Gaffron said, "Constructing a garage does not change the fact that there is no legal place to put a septic system on the property now, or ever. Absent City sewer becoming a reality in the next year, I would approach Council and suggest that they authorize Staff to deal with septic systems on a more intense basis in this area than we have in the past years." All voted aye. Motion carried. (#6)ZONING PILE #1656-OONALD L. MEYER 485 PARK AVENUE VARIAMCES-POBLIC HEARING Kelley noted that Donald Meyer was present, and opened the Public Hearing on this application at 7:09 p.m. Mabusth gave a brief explanation of the Variances sought by Mr. Meyer in order to construct a single story addition, which includes a deck, to his existing residence. She referred Planning Commission to the applicant's hardship statements. (See Jeanne Mabusth's memo dated July 1, 1991.) Kelley noted that Mr. Meyer had provided a statement from the adjacent property owner, John Gerhardson, that indicated he had no objections to Mr. Meyer's construction plans. Rowlette commented that she had seen an old septic tank that was being filled in. Meyer confirmed that he had located the old septic tank on the property and was filling it in. At 7:12 p.m., Kelley closed the Public Hearing, as there were no comments from the public. Bellows stated that Mr. Meyer had nowhere else to construct the addition. - 6 - ta"’ ’t"- i'r k:I'r-1^’ !-'■ :is'if v-i . ^T 1 ' til-W-'-If' it ■ i.pj|. lli!'*-' p, 'f'5- •V fr.'i' Pk.i4'^ '■V •■ * m OROUO PLANNItlG COfiMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 15, 1991 (#6)ZONING FILE 11656-NEYER CONTINUED It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Bellows, to recomraend that Council approve the side setback Variance, and the nine foot separation between the principal and detached accessory structures. All voted aye. Motion carried. (#7)ZONING FILE il658-LYNDON S. "BILL" STUBBS 255 FOX STREET RENEWAL VARIANCE-PUBLIC HEARING Bill Stubbs was present for the review of this application. The Public Hearing was opened by Kelley at 7:13 p.m. Habusth stated that, had it not been for the delay in the Title Registration for this property (a requirement that must be completed prior to the issuance of a building permit), this application would not have come back to the Planning Commission. Kelley stated that he has an opportunity to view this property frequently. He asked Mr. Stubbs if ic is still his belief that the property will support a single-family home. Stubbs noted that the person wishing to purchase the property was present this evening. He states that the gentleman has thoroughly examined the property, and wants to build a home on it. Kelley asked Mabusth whether there are any indications that the building envelope on this property has changed in light of rainfall received this year. Mabusth replied, "Staff has noted no change. The City has recommended that the drainageway be redefined so that it no longer fans out as it approaches the v/etland." Kelley expressed concern about the eventual failure of the septic system on this property. He questioned how the City can be assured that adequate notification regarding the limited septic capacity is given to the property owner. Mabusth advised that Council's approval included the establishment of development guidelines. It will be necessary for any person wishing to develop the property to first meet with City Staff to discuss the special development standards. She added that the standards included a requirement whereby the septic drainfield would be metered and monitored so as not to exceed the capacity of 600 gallons. The structural development was to be limited to 15% of the building envelope east of the drainageway, which would allow a building pad of approximately 4,500 s.f. Kelley asked the public in attendance if anyone had - 7 - ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 15, 1991 (17)ZONING FILE #1658-STUBBS CONTINUED questions or cominents regarding this application. There was no response and, at 7:20 p.m. , Kelley closed the Public Hearing. Bellows commented that it may be necessary to have some control over the driveway on this property, from a hardcover and location standpoint. It was moved by Johnson, se<-->nded by Kelley, to recommend that Council renew the lot area Variance for Bill Stubbs at 2555 Fox Street. Motion, Ayes-6, Nay-0, Bellows abstained. Motion carried. (#8)ZONING FILE #1662-RICHARD A COLLETTE ROBERTS 1937 PAGBRNESS POINT ROAD VARIANCES-PUBLIC HEARING Richard and Collette Roberts were present. The Public Hearing was opened by Kelley at 7:23 p.m. Gaffron reviewed the issues involved with the Roberts' application for Variances to construct a new home, as set forth in his July 9, 1991 memo. Kelley asked Richard Roberts if he had talked with neighboring property owners about his construction plans. Roberts replied, "I neighbors about our plans, the property." have talked, extensively, with my They would like to see a new house on Kelley stated that he basically had no objections to the Roberts' application, but questioned why hardcover within the 75-250 foot zone could not be held to 25%. Roberts was of the understanding that the house must meet a 50 foot setback from the street, and that the additional 2.4% of hardcover results from having such a long driveway. Gaffron stated that the setback for the LR-IC Zoning District is 30 feet, rather than 50. Roberts indicated that he would have no problem moving the house forward to meet a 30 foot setback. Kelley suggested that the applicants may wish to consider their future construction plans when determining where to place the house. He encouraged the Roberts to plan their construction so hardcover will not be exactly 25%, but perhaps a bit under, if possible. - 8 - I *• • I: ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 15, 1991 («8)ZONING PILE #1662>ROBERTS CONTINUED Rowlette stated that she had seen a parking area near the lakeshore across from the Roberts' house. She questioned whether that area would be removed. Roberts replied, "All of the hardcover on the lakeside of the property ill be eliminated. That will include the area of plastic and sand." Gaffron stated that, technically, a Conditional Use Permit would be required for such a project to take place within the 0-75 foot setback. He suggested, however, that in light of the fact that the applicants are cleaning up an existing situation, that they be allowed to just proceed without the need for additional approval. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that the applicants should be allowed to remove the sand with underlying plastic and parking area without seeking a Conditional Use Permit. There were no comments from the public pertaining to this application, and Kelley closed the Public Hearing at 7:28 p.m. Johnson agreed that if the applicants construct the house so t^ t it will conform with the hardcover standards, he would have no objection to recommending approval of the lot area and lot width Variances. Gaffron confirmed that moving the house up to the 30 foot setback line would reduce the hardcover in t 75-250 foot setback area by approximately 3%. It was moved by Johnson, seconded by Rowlette, to recommend that Council approve a lot area and lot width Variance for the construction of a new residence at 193? Eagerness Point Road, and that hardcover be maintained at or below the required percentage. Kelley added for the record th«.t the applicants tried in good faith to acquire additional prc»perty. All voted aye. Motion carried. («9)ZONING FILE #1664-HILLIAH B. BOCKMAN 1090 LOMA LINDA AVENUE VARIANCI8-PIIBLIC HEARING Kelley noted William Bookman’s presence Public Hearing at 7:29 p.m. and opened the Gaffron gave a brief description of the existing and proposed hardcover for Mr. Bockman's property, as outlined in his July 9, 1991 memo. Kelley closed the Public Hearing at 7:34 p.m., as there were - 9 - t 'A1- >r I" life. ??■• pih-I' !!^ r< fki. r i^'.‘r'* M ■ b-- fV' I ifi-**' t: r- p' ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 15, 1991 (#9)ZONING PILE #1664-BOCKMAN CONTINUED no public comments or concerns regarding this application. Rowlette stated that she would prefer to have the applicant construct the deck so that it will meet the hardcover requirements. She indicated that she and Mr. Bockman had discussed various options of reducing hardcover, such as removing the cement pieces by the back door, and redesigning the deck stairs. Bockman stated that he v/ould have no dif*" hardcover to what now exists. .y keeping It was moved by Rowlette, seconded by oohnson, to recommend that Council approve an average lakeshore setback side setback Variance for the construction of a deck at 1090 Loma Linda Avenue, with no increase in hardcover. All voted aye. Motion carried. (#10)il66b>TBOIIAS MCCARTHY 1424 BALODR PARK ROAD VARIANCES-POBLIC HEARING The applicant, Thomas McCarthy, Architect, Michial Mularoni. vms present, as was his Kelley opened the Public Hearing at 7:59 p.m. Mabusth provided an overview of the issues involved with Mr. McCarthy's application, ns she more fully set forth in her July 2^^ 2,991 moo o. Sne asked the Planning Commission whether they would consider the proposed overhang as hardcover. Kelley indicated that the Planning Commission. v/han reviewing similar applications involving overhangs, has taken a position that overhangs do constitute hardcover. Planning Commission members agreed with Kelley Kelley asked Mularoni to explain the reasoning behind the unique design of the proposed garage. Mularoni explained that the garage was designed to enhance the visual aesthetics of the property as one approaches it from the street, and to make the most of what currently exists without adding a significant amount of hardcover. He noted that hardcover within the 75-250 foot setback area would be reduced with the plan he is proposing. Kelley asked where visitors to the property would park if the garage is constructed as planned. Mularoni stated that the parking capacity would be reduced - 10 - p.' ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 15, 1991 (#10)ZONING FILE #1665-MCCARTHY CONTINUED by one car. Kelley asked the Planning Comnission to give their opinions regarding the need for a two-car garage. Bellows and Cohen indicated that two-car garages are a basic necessity because of the inclenient weather in Minnesota, Bellows added, however, that she does not want the use of any property on Baldur Park Road intensified beyond its existing state. She noted that the existing two-car garages on Baldur Park Road appear to be a minimal size, and have a single door for access. Bellows said. "I do not feel that anything about this proposal is justified.” Rowlette indicated that she too v/as concerned about the size of the proposed garage addition. Kelley asked Rowlette if she would prefer a standard two-car garage and one parking space outside the garage. Rowlette answered in the affirmative. Johnson concurred v/ith Bellows and Rowlette. He stated that, given the extremely small lot sizes on Baldur Park, any Improvement constitutes a fairly significant intensification of the property. Mularoni suggested that the sketch of the proposed garage may be misleading to the Planning Commission. He stated that the proposed garage is only a few feet wider than a standard tv/o-car garage, and will be shorter than the existing single stall garage. Johnson said. "That may be true, but the garage has more of a broad face, which gives the appearance of intensification, especially with the walkway through the middle of the structure." Mularoni commented that if the walkway were not located in the middle of the structure, it would be located off to the side, and there would then have to be an additional walkway behind the garage. He said, "The shortest distance between two points is a straight line. The reason I designed the garage this way is because if I had designed a standard two-car garage, with a walkway along the side and across the back, there would have been more hardcover." Kelley stated that normally the Planning Commission focuses largely on hardcover issues. However, in this case, the impact of driving down Baldur Park Road and seeing structure after structure piled on top of one another is of equal concern. - 11 - ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 15, 1991 (#10)ZONING FILE 11665-MCCARTHy CONTINUED Mularoni stated that he could have opted to remove the existing garage to construct an attached tv;o car garage. However, that would still have required a front yard setback Variance, and would have had more of an impact on the existing tree. He said. "The plan we are now proposing will only encroach on approximately 20% of the root zone of the tree." Rowlette said, "If the applicant constructs a standard twO”Car garage, then the front of the garage would extend straight across. The way it is now proposed, the garage addition will be set back farther from the street to allow for parking. If parking in front of the garage is eliminated, then there will have to be a parking area off to the side. Perhaps the standard two-car garage would be v;orse than \/hat is being proposed." Mularoni added, "My client objected to having a flat expanse of garage door as the focal point of the entrance. I tried to design something that would be a bit more pleasing to the eye, while providing the most d-'rect access to the house, and keeping hardcover to a minimum." Kelley raised the issue of fire protection as another concern. He stated that there would be no room for a fire truck to get back to the house if the proposed garage structure is constructed across the front of the property. The front of the proposed garage v/ill be 31 feet wide, and the width of the lot is only 50 feet. Mularoni advised that there is a well on the property that could be used in the case of fire. He showed that the v/ell is located just beyond the roof overhang. Gaffron informed Mularoni that State law requires a minimum of three feet from structure, which in this case would be the overhang. Mularoni stated that the well is three feet from the overhang. Bellows asked how the well would be maintained, given its location, if the proposed garage is constructed. Mularoni stated that another well could existing well required repair. be dug if the Kelley indicated that the issue of the well is entirely separate. Johnson reiterated that he is concerned about the intensification of this property and the overall visual effect it will have on the neighborhood. He said, "I would recommend - 12 - 4. ■■ II ft I 1i - I d “ t h. y. ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 15. 1991 (#10)ZONIN6 FILE #1665-MCCARTHY CONTINUED approval of the existing deck, and the additional stall onto the existing garage." construction Bellows said, "I hesitate to intensify, which in this case means to convert non-structural to structural hardcover, this property in any v/ay. I would recommend denial of the request to add anything on to the existing garage." Cohen concurred with Johnson, though he was sympathetic to the Architect's attempts to create a visually pleasing structure. He did believe that the applicant is entitled to a two-car garage. Rowlette also agreed that the applicant should have a two-car garage. She was unsure, however, whether any other construction alternatives would result in hardcover reductions for the property as is now proposed. Schroeder asked Mularoni if he had given any consideration to designing a long garage which would require one car to be parked ahead of the other, rather than side by side. Mularoni stated that the thought had crossed his mind, but such a configuration would eliminate a large portion of landscaping, and given the minimal setback from the neighboring property on that side, he gave it no further consideration. Schroeder stated that what Mr. Mularoni is proposing is more pleasing to the eye than what one would view in the case of a typical two-car garage with a single door. He suggested that he would favor the proposed plan more if the middle walkway section could be narrowed. Moos indicated that she too favored a tv/o-car garage, but that the proposed structure is too overv/helming. Kelley suggested tabling this application to provide the opportunity for the applicant and his Architect to revise their plan. It was the Planning Commission's consensus that the existing deck could be replaced with a deck of equal size. Bellows recommended that Mularoni work with Staff on the issues of the well and fire protection. It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Johnson, to table application #1665. All voted aye. Motion carried. At 8:55 p.m., Michial Mularoni and Thomas McCarthy returned to the meeting, and asked the Planning Commission if they would - 13 - iili ir-itTmaM- r till r itf i ii', ''I--. &. Si fctk’m'-”' y ||:fe- ■ ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 15. 1991 (#10)ZONING FILE 31665-MCCARTHY CONTINUED reconvene the Public Hearing and vote to recommend approval or denial, rather than tabling. Mularoni amended the application so that it v/ould now propose removal of the overhang structure. It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Johnson, to reconvene the Public Hearing on Zoning application #1665. Mabusth noted that it was possible to reconvene the Public Hearing in this case because there were no members of the public present for the Public Hearing. All voted aye. notion carried. It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to recommend that Council deny the application presented by Thomas McCarthy. Kelley noted that he did not object to the Variances associated with thw replacement of the existing lakeshore deck, but objected to the Variances sought in connection with the garage. Motion, Ayes-5, Rowlette, and Cohen, Nay. Motion carried. Cohen stated that despite the size of the proposed garage, the that hardcover would be reduced from what now exists outweighed that. Rowlette agreed with Cohen that the reduction of hardcover, in her opinion, was more important than the size of the garage. (fll)SONIHG FILE 11666-MICHAEL HILBELINK 2180 PROSPECT AVENUE RSmilAL VARIANCES-PUBLIC HEARING ^ - ho Don Becker, owner of the subject property, indicated that he was present. Kelley opened the Public Hearing at 8:45 p.m. Mabusth noted that the applicant has amended his proposal which requires a less intense side street setback Variance. Kelley asked Mabusth if she had heard anything from the property owner to the north. Mabusth indicated that she had heard nothing from the Jentiluccis, and that they were not present this evening. Kelley closed the Public Hearing at 8:47 p.m. moved by Cohen, seconded by Rowlette, to recommend that Council approve the lot area and side street setback Variances. for Michael Hilbelink’s property located at 2180 Prospect Avenue. All voted ave. Motion carried. (#12)ZONING PILE #1667-WHITNEY MACMILLAN 1700 FOX STREET VARIANCES-PUBLIC HEARING Kelley noted that Mr. and Mrs. MacMillan were present, and opened the Public Hearing at 8:47 p.m. - 14 - aSl : Ji I Cx r ki ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 15, 1991 (f12)ZONING FILE #1667-MACMILLAN CONTINUED Mabusth advised that the MacMillans are seeking a Variance to the City's clean fill standards. Bellows stated that had taken some additional time to look into this matter. She said. "I found that absolutely no one contradicted anything that Mrs. MacMillan had said about her attempts to resolve this matter. Contrary to what was said previously, I do think there is some responsibility on the City's Building Inspection Department, when they have been working closely with a project, to be aware of all aspects of it. I believe that the MacMillans exercised diligence in trying to make sure that this was taken care of adequately. They were caught in the midst of a rule and system change." Kelley noted that he had been out to the site recently and had seen pieces of tar and cement just off of the old main driveway. He asked MacMillans if they intend to do more work in that area. Mrs. MacMillan stated that more topsoil would be hauled in and the area would be landscaped and planted with evergreens. Rowlette asked Staff if anything could be do.ie to assure that the various Fire Departments servicing the City of Crono are notifying persons of the proper demolition procedure. Mabusth advised that Staff has informed the Fire Departments of the problems that are arising with the demolition permit process, and has asked that Fire Departments inform persons of the need to obtain a demolition permit from the City whenever a structure is scheduled for a burn. In light of there being no comments from the public, Kelley closed the Public Hearing at 8:50 p.m. It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Cohen, to recommend that Council approve a Variance to the City's Clean Fill standards. Kelley stated that he wanted Staff to confirm that the septic tanks have been filled in. Bellows suggested using the City's Newsletter to advise persons of the need for permits for various projects. All voted aye. Motion carried. (#13)HARDCOVER-STATUS OF HEED CONTROL FABRICS Gaffron advised the Planning Commission that this matter had been referred back to them by Council, who wished to have a more defined method of utilizing weed control fabrics. Kelley questioned whether it v/ill be possible to differentiate between woven and non-woven fabric after each has been on the ground for several years. - 15 - B:t I fc. m- •‘' T ■..' ‘ >- m- ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 15, 1991 (#13)HEED CONTROL FABRICS CONTINUED Gaffron stated that it is easy to differentiate between t.ie two fabrics when first installed, but was uncertain if that would be the case after a period of time. He added that it is uncertain whether the fabric will last five years. Gaffron asked the Hanning Commission for their views on the use of non-woven fabri- in the 0-75 foot setback. He noted that allowing the use of the fabric in this area, could result in someone completely covering the 0-75 foot area with landscaping. Kelley asked. "Isn't the ability to enforce the use of noi|..|fQven fabric versus woven fabric or plastic the key issue here?" Gaffron stated that v/ithout the benefit of a permitting process for the installation of weed control fabrics, it will be difficult to enforce. Cohen indicated that nothing has ever been allowed with’n the 0-075 foot setback area. Bellows believed that there is much more to this issue, than just whether or not to allow the use of non-woven fabric within the 0-75 foot setback area. She said, "I think there is the ^asue of chemical use, and other implications, such as visual quality. If we want to see the 0 — 75 foot setback area remain green and grassy, then how many chemicals v/ill be allowed. I think we should be addressing this from the aspect of what we want to occur within the 0-75 foot setback area. The best protection for the lakeshore banks is to allow for long, uncut grass. I believe this subject should be considered by a group that deals with lake issues. This is not a simple hardcover issue." Rowlette stated that the unregulated fertilizing of lawns is a serious issue for consideration. Kelley agreed with Bellows and Rowlette, but believed that it will be virtually impossible to regulate the use of non-woven fabric. Johnson stated that the City has not, in the past, regulated the use of plastic. He added that various degrees of permeability exist for woven versus non-woven fabrics, and that such is the case for the various types of soil. He said, "There are certain types of soil that are as imp'^rmeable as landscaping plastic." Schroeder noted that t.he statistics indicate that there is an advantage to using the fabrics as opposed to plastic, and in light of that, people should be encouraged to use the fabric. He - 16 - iSickat . .. r- v! '(-* , t ii b t- F-'m. ORONO PLANNING COFVllSSION MEETING HELD JULY IS, 1991 (#13)nEED CONTROL FABRICS CONTINUED suggested that it may be appropriate hardcover factor to the fabric. a s s 1C7 n certain Bellows agreed with Kelley that enforcing the use of fabrics could be a real problem. She reiterated that there are more issues that need to be considered in conjunction with the fabric issue and that a comprehensive approach should be taken, rather than one that is piecemeal. The Planning Commission agreed that a handout addressing the hardcover issue, such as the one used by the City of Eagan, would be helpful. Kelley polled the Planning Commission members for their opinions regarding the following: V/hether landscaping fabric should be used within the 0-75 foot setback area. He asked how many members believe fabric should not be used in this area. Johnson was undecided. Kelley, Bellows, Cohen, Schroeder and Moos did not want to see anything used within the 0-75 foot setback area. Rov/lette indicated that it may be appropriate to use fabric in that area. Kelley asked if the fabric is used in the 75-250 foot setback area, and is only considered to represent a fraction of hardcover, should the percent of hardcover allov.ed \/ithin that area be increased to compensate for the use of fabric. Johnson and Rowlette indicated that they would favor increasing the allowed percent in the 75-250 foot setback area if fabric is used. Kelley, Bellows did not agree. Cohen. Schroeder, and Moos were undecided. Cohen indicated that he is concerned about the fabric being a relatively nev; concept, and that it nay have drawbacks that have not yet been discovered. Johnson stated that, currently, people can landscape th<~ entire area within the 75-250 foot setback area, provided they have nothing but ground below it. He questioned what difference there would be, given the permeability of fabric, if people use the fabric and landscape the entire 75-250 foot setback area. He stated th : the method of calculating hardcover is too difficult now. If the fabric is assi ;ned a hardcover factor to be used in the calculation, people will not even attempt to follow the City's standards. Kelley indicated that, for the time being, there had been sufficient discussion on this topic. He asked Bellows if she had anything to report in terms of the progress of the Facilities Committee. - 17 - i.ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 15, 1991(#14)CITY FACILITIES COMMITTEE REPORT AND PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE COMMENTS: Bellows reported that the Committee has held one meeting, vhere preliminary, but broad issues were discussed. Issues discussed included the type of facility d red, general aesthetic criteria. The facility will ..e constructed on the northeast parcel, and the architect has been directed to come back with drawings that show a building that will conform more to the site. The architect was advised that the City does not '/ish to grant Variances to itself for this project. Bellows stated that the second raeecing or the Committee will be held Tuesday, July 16, 1991. Bellows informed the Planning Commission of Council’s action taken on each of the zoning items or the Agenda for the July 3, 1991, Council meeting. (il5)8TATUS REPORT BY LAKE USE COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVES Schroeder reported that the Lake Use Co^ittee meeting focused on the process of conforming the City's shoreland regulations to those o£ the D'NR. He stated that Michael Gaffron has prepared an excellent line-by-line comparison. Kelley added that one of the major issues is the way in which the lakes within the City of Orono are designated. He stated that the DNR has prepared definitions, and related regulations and setbacks. Gaffron advised that the next meeting is scheduled for July 24, 1991 at 7:00 p.m. («16)OTHBR ISSUESCouncilmember Jabbour commended Candace Roulette for her efforts in attempting to work with the City of Long Lake to help them better understand Orono's position on a corridor for Highway 12. APPROVAL OP MINUTES It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Kelley, to approve the minutes of the June 17, 1991 Planning Commission meeting. All voted aye. Motion carried. PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE It was agreed that Candace Roulette would attend the August 12, 1991 Council meeting as the Planning Commission Representative. ADJOURNMENT The July 15, 1991, Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 9:43 p.m. - 18 - J '■-t w&v-Tf • - * ^mfy: ^ 0Z^‘‘iZ te:v-;-’ fe^: ■ fe''i0. .V iiiv-:. lilil. ' p'.v;- ■■* ®a. vT • ' “fs..- ’Y * ' ‘ I' ^ LAKE MxiiilSTONKA C0N3ERVATI0W DISTRICTMINUTESIK.HNICAL K’l. Vli;W (.UMMllML oraiin'OtIona 1 Mootina • Julv /A. I'.»‘•l Notw.'^'.t Bank Buildina Con f erotic-? FJooni 900 E. Wavzata Blvd. . wavzata . l<: 00 • UJ; 00 AM ATTENOENCE and theNine of the eleven particioatina cities, the I MUD ONR were repre ;ted. The cities of Uo-johaven and Shorewood were not represented. No renreseti tat i ve from either the Metro Council or the Minnehaha Creek Watershed Dist-’ct was in attendance. (Attendance list attached) INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW Ed Tick of the UNR welcomed the p ir t i r i nati ts >nd had them introduce themselves. He tlien prosentc*.! a slide show and suromarired the statewide DNR Shot eland Regulations, with p3f-t1cular empha-'is on issues relevant to Lake Minnetonka. Ed then distributed to each representative a tiound packet of information containing the DNR Shore land Regulations, the DNR model ordinance, an ordinance review clircklist. and the DNR / LMCU / city grant agreement. Stove f^ro-.tin. consultant to the LMCD for this process also distributed a business card to each representative. SCHEDULING / ORGAN IZATION Several people montioned that a lot of ground woi k already been done during the LMCU planning process and individually by staff of some cities, so they felt the Committee should dive into the process and meet oiten. Agreement was reached Miat the rominitte<‘ should mr-t every oth«?r Ihuisday . . om HHM) iu ihj am h th«' .cme ^ location. This will result in me .'tings on Aug. U and on Sent. S A i'^. After some discussion, mombet s der ided to gc- throunh the process on the b.asis of issues, rathoi than city by city. Thoy aloo docidcd to review the total n.:;ckaao or theii conclusions at the end of the p-occ'S. Members decided that Jim Uttlev of the Metro Council snould serve as the chairperson for the moetings. John Stine. DNR. mentioned that thov will be developing some ground rules for the proces s. Steve Prestin asked that membots moke a brief comment on When they tfiouoht their city might bo ready for assistance from him so he can plan his schedule. they Minnetonka: not until Sopt. becau.c they ue devcloDing now lopogianhic maoping. Woodland: want to start soon, boring Park: re.idv to start. Mtka. Be.ach: r^ent. Oct. 1 r; ■I •t.; ; f/- EV;^ * '#**;*»««^iSiip vm-.^ •^w..wM«i. oynvt* >oh; Hie island, ' • ; . c\^v,. ■■ ^ ■ ■;:-'l|a:': ■ ' /' • '• 'loi-'v' ■{< £ •*T« .. ¥-•><.?.• ■'*...' I I ■^!-?5r#'lfe ■ '■’■•’•■ *'•• ,»H*i«:Jl».4 C«t.., , 8.02*A.,.. it'siii*’*' fcsi- —— -— tM ■0$ -f A j?v-SS^ijv f 'i r ?■ ■:| J ■ • 1 ii 'rr^f Y ■■ '■ • '--S' ■ '?-■ & •• T\ (k • -rs;.«.a\ . •5.<1. X V W y ■ • ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ■ - ^; ■ ■ ~"J^ikrT^ ‘ ““• ~ I--------- \ - ^ il - — 31' *8 jffiS gS 1 11 f. ^ 1 t I S is i ^•ii Is - atK »2 : Mim ml I» t«n.«ir <^.vsi I8 li i» I if li^ , .!«•.»» S311el4« kMWt., l;^. ,,_J| JU ' Mi«l fUt^ turwf Mfe *• !•» rjiipipmri. .. '1' Certificate of Survey for Gerald L. Benoit in liOt 1, Block 8, Baynide Addition to Lake Minnetonka Hennepin County., Minnesota #1847 i I.FX.M, description OF PREMISES SUHVEYIjH —— SO feet of the Wo.t .->« toet ot hot n.ook 8. MV.ys.dc Addition to I.ake Minnetonka." iS"t, BlocK Mdltlon to ).«. Hlnd.tonK.-. EXCEPT the «o.t HO feet of said Lot 1. ThlB survey t« “ “5?" 'JJ* thereon!‘S the^projised IrolJtrn oE not purport to =ho. eny other rhpro.e- ments or encroachments. I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly ?egiStIred Civil Engineer and Land Srrveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. COFFIN t GRONBERG, INC. . . . . . . . . .._MfJ . I«i.Mark S. Gronberg MN. Lie. No. 12755 Engineers, Land Surveyors, Planners Long Lake, Minnesota : Spot elevation •Scvale* 1 inch = 30 feet Lte March 22 , 1991 • ; Iron marker found o 1 Iron marker set Bearings shown are based up on an assumed datum. Cr/^.4) ; Existing elevation Datum: Mean Sea Level ■I ^ ■■.al 4*/ § \4/4.M 1 Si /TlTiTiit MORTW ------N 90* 00*00” W 474.90------ »u4H tin* at 6»v‘e tv* 5 ■4 I I CITYofORONO Why Does The City Need ANew City Hail & Public Works Garage? >12»M VWV OPORONO Sjgg"- City Offices crowded and not accessible for the handicapped. City Hall # Overcrowded office space and public service areas. # Buildingdoesnotmeetminimumfirecode orhandicapped access standards, wasnot originally designed foroffice use. # Healing/ventilating/electrical systemsare inadequate and caruKtt be upgraded to the necessary stands ids. ® Documentandsupplystorageareasaieof inadequate size, poorly accessible and not climate cont rolled # Building isslructurally inadequate to bear the wei)^t of necessa ry files, office furniture and equipment. Floorsarenot level, roof and windows leak, building is not energy efficient. ___________ Police working in rented space. Council Chambers too small and no toilets. Council Chambers # Buildingoriginallyconsttucledinl906. # Inadequate hea ling and cool ing systems, poor insulation. ^ Lackof restroom facilities. # Inadequalesizemeeting room with lackof erwlos^ public overflow space. # Public and handica pped parking a teas do not meet minimum standards. # Largeequipment storage building (lumber- yard ") has deteriorated with age to an unsafe condition. Portions h ve been vacated dueto rotted floor boardsand failing structural members. # Public Worksofficebuildingisa converted 80 year old residence, is slructu ra lly uraound, poorly insula ted, atrd lacksadequalespace foroff ice/lunchroom/locker/storage needs of the Public Works Depa rtment. 9 Vehicleandequipmentmaintenancegarages lack up-to-date employee protection measu resand do not meet fire safety and energy codes. # Rammable and hazardousmaterialsstorage is inadequate. ^ Neitherlhesegaragesnorthe'Iumberyaid* areadequ. *etoprovidesa‘ secure equ ipmei .r storage. ' Truck traffic,salt/sandmixing,chipping operation,and unscreened outdoor material storage on a year-round basisa re ina ppropri- ate uses forth is residential a tea. 1 Unsecured and inadequate storage for dty equipment. City Hall overcrowded without proper document storage. No cells to hold suspects. Police • a««: satS9 s isaeii n Citizen Input Hearings Set For Aug. 28 9 Inadequate restroom facilities- 9 Inadequaleand non-seuirablciiolding liities. 9 Parkin^,, officespace,'lockerroomsareol inadequate size. 9 l>«ckofadeouateevidences:orageanMsor meeting rooms. 9 AddiT jnal heated vehiclestoragespaceis reipiired. mi Qtizen Advisory Conmuttee Submits Report InAptilofl9W,11i«OMnoaiy council ippointadaOtiaruhcflWMCcianitlM anpond of ■ dlvuncpoupolOiono midcnia. TKe Cofnmlttac was chargail with raconoBending tothePhwningCwMmiwiowwidCilyCDuncilone or more locatian fora new OtyHclL Police and PuUk Worts building. TheCooimltiacmctaia timea. They rev tewed the preaentC3tyfacflhlea, exiatifig and pro^eciadOty needs, city facilities of cofnpanbiecafninuriities,and proposed Qty facilities sitas. BsseduponitsRview.theConinijt- teeieconunendedthatnewCityhciUtiesbe built The ideal Gty&ciliiywould: • BeeasilyacceaBiblelotheI^lblic. - Nofbefatanaidentialaice. • Not takeicskIcMial property. - Benearotfierpubliefacdities. - HaveOtyutlUtiasavaiUMe. - Be large enough forallcunent facilities and for What Is Being Done About City Buildings? NewC^ Hall & Police Dept. Provides • Additional flexible community meeting space endcouncildiBBibcn. • Secundiecoidstangeanddocum^accca^ • Complete handicapped accessible iityfacili tea. • SeiviceoounlerandlobbyBreaforefReienI service foroonuminity needs. 9 Holdlngcdlsfersuspect detention. 9 Secured police vdiidestonge. 9 Emergency equipment Stonge. 9 Suffworiopsce for efficient computerized services. Stafftniningaies. C2I II ik FtaaMeExpandOUatyHall Plans. The Com kted that there sre operatittgadvanlageiandcaataevingsiebeseined byplariiigatyHallPblkearidniHfcWatfcBatene locatton. Theydiacuasedhavingacentnllocation iorOty facilities aivl thecoroensus was that promineiKe oflocation at\d eaie of access were more impoiUitt than centrality. The Committee leviewed five sites which were available without coitdemnation and feasible for locationofoneormoreQtyfacilities. Theexisting aty HsU/PuWic Woihssitesnd theQty Sewer pond sitem Old Crystal Bay Road wereiiKludedas siteoptiom. ThereconunetKlationof theComiiiit- leewaatoacquirethe site east of the Orono Schools, (aeesitemap),forChyHaU,PoliceStationand Public WorlsGange. 1 VEHICLE STORAGE AREA IS REMIR SHOPS OFFtCES Public Works B«iMin^^cx>r plan. Citv Vacates Unsafe Sectionsity Vac Of Riblic Works Building! In late 1990 two storage areas within the old lumberyard storage building were emptied and barred from furlherusedue to safety concerns. Thesea reas, comprisingabout 30 % of the bu ilding's floor space, had been us^ for m iscellaneous equipmentand materials storage. Rotting floorboa rdsandjoistscreatedasafetyhazaid requiringthisdraslicaction. The remainder of the building houses the city's street and pa rk mainte nance vehicles. Public Works Directorjohn Gerha rdson noted that the building has reached the end of its useful life. An inspection report in February 1991 rated majorstructuial deficiencies and ongoiitg deterioration from the roof to the foundation. It was recon"''ended that theentire structure be vacated and tom down before it collapses on itsowit. Says Gei .4 cdaoa'Weare li vittg on borrowed time...the first heavy snowfall could bring it down.' City needs new storage/ shops building by this fall. VEHICLE REPAIR New Public Works Building Provides 9 SecuredindoorheatedareaforaUcityequip- ment. 0 Vehicle repair and maintenance area for city equipment. # Healedindoorwotkareaforrepairandmainte* nance. 9 Screened andsecuredoutdoorstorage yard for materials. 9 Staff work areas aiul toilets. 9 CenttalizedlocationforaUstaff.equipiMntand services. City Coxmcil Reviews To^ Costs SinalBM, the City Council has offleiaUy been seeking means to solve em^a* improve tbs City FadUtypeoblsDU. The cumnthdiites were not designed fcr a dty, but as houses, a himberynid and as a township meetiiifhalL Eadi year aubaequetttooundia have reviewed the set money aside, and moved closer to sohitiona far the City needs. In 1987 the City design consultant, Boannan ft Aaaodatea, waa retained. Since then, many optiona have been expkeed and issues diacusaed regarding needa, lootion, site, and moat importantly cost FVom 1968to 1990, the Cifyreviewed projected coste ranging liraina7to4.7miUioii dollars ftw total City needs. The Council hasieceived and accepted thaCitiaenPaeilifyConunittee Report, appawved a site, and eatabUshed a eompsehensive list of needa with maximum costs. The listed project eosU represent the current projecthms by the consultant to the Council hr communityreview. ThisCoundlandthoaepresidingsince 1986havecontinuedtoseeklonfterm,eost effective, fanctional solutions far the City needs. The proposed fadlitiea solutions will serve Orono's needs well beyond the year2000. ORONO CITY FACILITIES PROJECTED COSTSTATEMENT 1. BUILDINGCDNSTRUCnON A. emrHALLftPOUCE • «,400J)00 «17300SQ.FT. B. PUBLIC WORKSCARACE 0 91,550^100 034,000SQ.FT.S2,9S0X)0O Z SITEOONSTRUenON 370,000 3. EQUIPMENT* FURNITURE 402dHX) 4. RNANCE&CONSULTANTCOSTS 335.000 5. CONTlNCENaES 250,000 6. LAND COSTS A. SITE PURQ iASE @ S 292.000 B. LESS PROJECTED SALE OF EXISTING @ <184300> PROPERTY 107300 7. PROJECTEDCOSTSTATEMPNT 54,414300 Existing Building Funds The City is financially in exrelleni condition with several options a va liable to pa y for the pioposed facilities. Beginning in 19R3. funds ha vel>een regularly setaside for this purpose, and now total approximately23milliondollars .Accordingtolhe Giysfinancial consultant. Ehlersand .As.HKi.ites, this building fund will allow the Qty flexibility In ehoos.ng a financing plan with a low cost to the taxpayer. fheCouncil isieviewingthetaxpayer i m pact a nd total comprehensive project costs to genera tc the most costKiffectivelong leim financial >i rnin^emenls. Site purchased for nau city facilities. »iiiiwiiii)i Mayors Council Unanimous Amroval for New QtyHaU Mtwmoki jrntyttkmm «»y |SSLa.Mmm gaaffissf- I.UmmC m* • CaMriJaktow S2 u« Or.l Jsxi:f hhmwdm «i4i>¥ln*,ilM0MMaiyCaMdlii«Mwiii- MMriy MlipMflnK H m iwd for MW CoMMCil lOflkmMM DtpMMMM Md PmMIc Wo(b Gmim. ODt»M mmUi«cmMlimin llw AdnM- MkM CMRm,iMk of phmMM (yw^phMilK M in dw Cn«c4CXwikHii M dHWHiMMly dKHftt PtaUk Woiln fuafi.the Mm DmiMMni in MMHd ^ McMaMionnnHdfi kiLtai«Uhn.aIl iiMiiMMydMdlirlily.Hmm tnMita wfMlid ky ol M in otte «o M^y fOM fMliiy pnMk MorkM 1>kpa|Kltol^«m Atanwal^ dM Ml nMHi dMrt we m taldng Mi Ion to •» infwud wMi MtowMillitMiyDrand iMtoi ■y." •■Mddiftolitftopnmto. H wOmmiiim ........... )>wliltoii|Mfc■>■—■■ ito tftopMifaMMiMtotaiiNMiMMaiMf** d»rwiiiidilwti*|W........ii»H *nftoiMi«w«HMl^.« w<" to Mr MW /ktoBiMdr. kWwdMWMtoyi .todhto Weaic cenlinuinstoaackin^tfRiniOKino iiihiiiila Over the paal momllw, toote o< you have altonded our icguUr mectlngi and have provided ua with MoealionB and ideaa '\e thaiAyou. Sent on the agenda ia a lour of our cunen* facility ao you can get an idea of the cofwlitianB uivlerwhich the aUff ia working. The tour ia acheduled for Saturday,Auguat 24th. flam 9am to 11am. A puUic meeting ia ached uled for Wednae da y,Auguat 2Mi at 7pm in the Council Chambeia. tsaa LMyLMta fWmHamar CtwamWton MaatoNaImn WhatWinBeTlie Cost To The Taxpayer? The «tiiiutcd cost to the iMkltntMl hcnriMtead taxpayer for aS4,000,000Pro)Ktisnotexp«tcdtoexceedl.75% increase in ttietotalannualpropSftytaxcsforalSyearperiod. ThefoUoMring chait indicates the proiected tax increase for several estimated homemaikptvahMs. $80,000 $15 $100,000 $22 $200,000 $65 $300,000 $109 $400,000 $152 City Facility Tours Saturday. August 24.9 a.m. to 11 ajn. City Public Meeting Wgd wrtay, AugiaM 29, 700 p.m.. Oiono Council Chunbeim FIRST CLASS MAIL USPOSTAOe PAID crystal bay. MR 553ZS PERMIT NO t 9BT