HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-12-1998 Council Packetr
AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, OCTOBER 12,1998,7:00 P.M.
ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA
(♦) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council
under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public
Packet - located on the counter near the sign in sheet.
COUNCIL MEETING
ROLL CALL
CONSENT AGENDA ^ ^
1.Approve/Amend CnVOFOBOHO
7:00 p.m.
2.Presentation - Orono Schools - Healthy Youth Initiative and Mentorship Program
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
♦3. Re^. lir Meeting of September 28,1998
PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - James White, Representative
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Charles Schroeder, Representative
PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person)
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT .
4.#2404 Otten Brothers Nursery, 2350 Wayzata Boulevard - PUD # 1 Amendment - AdopUon
5.#2418 Robert Lund on beiiulf of Graydon and Michelle Newman, 1655 Bohn's Point Road •
Variance - Denial Resolution
6.#2420 Robert Ryan, Jr., 3535 Chiistine Drive - Variance - Denial Resolution
7.Tonkawa Shores Private Road Staridards Review
8.Plumbing in Accessory Buildings - Zoning Code Amendment - Ordinance
9.#2389 Daniel Kluth, 2801 Fox Street - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution
10.Interim Uses - Ordinance
MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT
ENGINEER REPORT
■^11 Pay Request #2 for Shoreline/Heritage Drive Sanitary Sewer Improvements
12.Amend Assessment Roll for Shoreline/Heritage Drive Sanitary Sewer Improvements - Resolution
/r 13.No Parking - Femdale Road North - Resolution
14.Discuss/Approvc Golf Course Painting
r
AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, OCTOBER 12,1998; 7:00 P.M.
ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA
CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT
15. Renew Participation in Livable Communities Act - Resolution
16. Lighting for Orono City Facilities Parking Areas
* 17. Budget Amendment for ExpendiUires Related to County Road 15 Study
18. Authorize Agreement with Mn/DOT for Highway 12 Noise and Vibration Study - Resolution
19. Schedule Work. Sessions
CITY ATTOIWEY’S REPORT
* 20. LICENSES
* 21. BILLS
UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS
1998
10/12 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m.
10/13 - Meeting with Orono Oaks Property Owners, 5:30 p.m. at 1290 Orono Oaks Drive
10/19 - Planning Commission Meeting, 6:30 p.m.
10/26 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m.
11/02 - Park Comn'ission Meeting, 7:15 p.m.
11/03 - GENERAL ELECTION, Polls Open 7:00 a.m. - 8:00 p.m.
i 1/04 - Highway 12 Design Review Committee, 5:30 p.m.
11/09 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. ^
1 1/1 1 - HOLIDAY, Veteran ’s Day
1 1/16 - Planning Commission Meeting, 6:30 p.m.
11/23 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m.
1 1/26 - HOLIDAY, Thanksgiving
1 1/27 - HOLIDAY, Thanksgiving
r
I Public Attendance
MEEnNG Date / <?//2/
\ /
5□□
Council
Planning Commission
Pakk Commission
Other
NAME (please print)ADDRESS
PRESENT FOR (from agenda)
NAME OR NUMBER
4
1 Lu/\ya
^ O/z^ny I-^HSc-1-.y
I"! ^P^y Mr(^‘ tS'‘4c><^ Ay^fVwV^-^A./
(M (a / cP/ 0
?^.(yo7iyyu\.3i\oo
/ i ^ ^ ^ 1 . *
5 l s-v-v tSo^ sc//- o-., Aw 7Yo</
// b P C l\I- 0 ^ ^ ( OC< L1 Xf A*/
yr^iPi —, -t-^Z w4 ^
---------i------------------i----- . 1
//AA y/i co^<.tPLjTp ____________-
« J. Klu-fi 21^0 ( I^at ____l!____---------------
Q.•
• ••
in
*
•
11 __________________________________________________________—
19
•
19 __________________________________________________________________
Id
•
-----------------------------------------------------
15.
m
r
CuUi\JjL
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
OCT 1 2 1998
cm'cror;c*.j
DATE: October 9. 1998
ITEM NO: ^
Department Approval:
Name RonMoorse
Title City Administrator
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
City Administrator's
Report
Item Description: Presentation by Orono Schools Staff Regarding the Healthy Communities
Health Youth Initiative and a Related Mentorship Program
The Orono School District has begun a healthy communities - healthy youth initiative and a related
mentorship program. A brochure regarding the mentorship program is attached. Teri Cain and
Melanie Deluca, Orono Schools' staff who are involved with these programs, have requested an
opportunity to present information regarding the programs to the City Council.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
No action required.
5
>
r^l r~ Tm~r—r r-m" n ir~ ‘ ~r rmn ~t i r r#- .
• *■ ' • ■■ .',1 ■'■-.h'-'* . v:.V V'• :..’K >:-•-•' i :■. ■ ; • ;ffy.rr ■■ •,;>I •V t \i;' I “ I- '■ ••<ABOUT THE PROJECT.
■ * r
ft. ■ .
I ■
V-^..
Orono Healthy Communities-Healthy
Youth has received a grant to launch
this new effort to connect youth with
community mentors and to reach out
to families and nelghborhooods.
'*.
t'-hS-:
r-A
Search Institute has Identified 40
developmental assets which are proven
to Increase resistance to problematic
behavior and heighten success. A
variety of mentorship possiblltles are
possible, from traditional one-on-one to
group mentorships. These mentorship
opportunities foster the assets of caring
adult relationships, structured activities,
caring neighborhoods, youth as
resources and community values youtii.
ABOUT THE PARTNERSHIP
k-: •r
6^.5 '-f
Orono Community Education and
YMCA Camp ihduhapi have Joined
forces to provide share resources and
expand a common vision and related
mission. The YMCA mission "To buiid
strong kids, strong families, strong
communities " is a naturai support and
partner to Orono *s Healthy Communl-
ties-Heatthy Youth emphasis on
buBdtng developmental assets.
\ 4
t
ft s.
4 ^r *. <
I' Ik61.S §*^ s ^ ^Iftll-Islll ssr -1 • •?)V'
• o
KEY CONNECTIONS:rk I at 4
OPPORTUNITIES
FOR MENTORING YOUTH IN
COMMUNITIES OF THE ORONO
SCHOOL DISTRICT
.
»' *■?.*** *
# i
V-
,.i ■ * > , ; •
\ f p . f . s .' ^ < i , •t »r. •
*■ • - V
^ - V
iv '
> * ■■ ‘. v *'*> ’■ ■"!
. ; .• t . . ^ . > , _ ^ •.
• r ^ r ' >
r. -V • ,
• .V'
V
«\ f
s > •
A
K t »^
5Ajre hterests to unlock
a your^ person's potential
iORONOl
5 !?
.kt ii /SSjs . t
* ♦
'•O ■*.**► ' '
n > •
AINS:
‘i
THIN i
ORONO I
r ■ 1
i ^ .r,‘ V /
t ' * > - •" Li
' ' * *^j
L’ '*' i
t. ■. -.r
n--
unlock
mtbf
V «
JkJR
pfT-• •J- ’P*
•4/
t^:
YOURSELF:How could I and someone / (myspouse, significant other, civic or hobby associa tion) bund rdatkmships with a few youth in our
community?
How could / share my skills and
interests and provide a learning activity to
expand youth's htmzons?
An outgrowth of Orono's Healthy
Communities * Healthy Youth initiative is to
provide potitive adult relationships and construc
tive use of time for youth for whom these two
xsets are not present or strong Almost anything
is possible given your talents, interests and
avaOabttity.
WHY MENTORING?
In a Louis Harris poll on mentoring:
7^39bof students said titeir mentors
helped them raise their goals and
expectations.
87% of students went directly to
coOe^ or planned to attend college
witiiin one year of gtaduating from high
school.
399() of mentored students improved
titeir grades.
879i) of mentored students said they
henefitted in some way firom titeir
mentoring relationships.
WHAT IT TAKES:Your desire to be s friend to youth Sr a wiifingness to share your time and talents are the most
important requirements for this prc^am. Trainbtgmtd
on-going support will be provided by mcA/Com
munity Education staff. We're reaching out to sdtooi-
agedyouth. Volunteers are asked to commit at least
three months to a mentoring profect
GROUP MENTORSHIP OPPORTUNITIES
COULD LOOK LIKE THIS:
*several youth learn car repair
through working on a project with
community members
*two or three youth areg'ven musk
lessons at a church rehearsal space
*neighboihoods hold summer bode
dub readings and activities at a park ■ » •
THIS SOUNDS GREA mi
HOW DO / GET INVOIVED?
Fill out the tear off portion of this brochure
znd mail it in. You wiU be contacted witiiin a week to
discuss your ideas and to notify you of training
OMXMtunitks or to answer any questions you may
have.
f ■ i
.1
> f-
I .
i - V
s \i » !.- Vr-V /
mi
TeriCainYouth Development Coorehnator YMCA Camp Ihduhcpi
Orono Community Education
Box 37 Loretto, MN 55357
(612) 47V-:;46. ext. 228
Fax: (612) 479-1333
f'r"'
. . ^ f t *
.■i
« ■
r.M'
8
7^
/
■ -a
3
COUNCIL r.r£2Tlv
IQQQ ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
OCT 1 Z -lyyo minutes FOR SEPTEMBER 28.199S
era' C;" ORONO
ROLL
The Council met on the above mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor Gabriel
Jabbour, Council Members J. Diann Goetten, Charles Kelley, Barbara Peterson and Richard Flint.
Representing Staff were City Administrator Ron Moorsc, City Attorney Tom Barrett, Planner/Zoning
Administrator Elizabeth Van Zomcren, Assistant Zoning Administrator Paul Weinberger, Director
of Public Services Gre^ Gappa, City Engineer Tom Kellogg, and Recorder Jackie Young.
Mayor Jabbour called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
(#1) CONSENT AGENDA
Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to amend the Consent Agenda to include Item 2B,
Martha and Douglas Head Sewer Project. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Items 6, 7, 8, 9, and 20 were added to the Consent Agenda
Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended.
VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(#2) ORONO ORCHARDS SANITARY SEWER PROJECT - PUBLIC HEARING
7:05 p.m. - 7:27 p.m.
A. Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications for Orono Orc!.,?.r^5 Sanitary Sewer
Improvements - Resolution No. 4161
Kellogg stated the feasibility study regarding the Orono Orchards sanitary sewer project has been
completed, with Orono Orchard Road. Woodhill Road, Smith Avenue, and Lsman Avenue being
targeted for hookup to the City’s sanitary sewer system.
Kellogg reported all of the septic systems in this area are non-conforming to the current regulations,
with more than half of the systems failing, and the options for replacement of septic systems are
extremely limited in this area. The residents have sent a letter requesting that the City begin the
process for a sewer project for this neighborhood.
A total of 23 units arc included in this project, and a rough estimate of the cost at this time is
appro.ximatcly $23,700 per unit. Kellogg stated an advertisement for bids will go out in the spring of
1999, and construction should commenee by May or June, with an estimated completion date of
August of 1999. Kellogg noted the final laj cr of bituminous asphalt will not be laid until the following
vear.
Page 1
■jBi
!
1 i
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 28.1998
(Orono Orchards Sanitary Sewer Project, continued)
Lili McMillan questioned whether the last two residences located on L>man Avenue will be able
to have gravity flow sewer due to the lowness of the land in that area.
Kellogg stated that section of the project has been analyzed and the gravity flow system should
\York in that area.
A resident inquired whether the $23,700 per unit was the actual cost of the project per residence.
Kellogg stated bids have not been received yet and that figure is merely a rough estimate of the
projected costs.
Mayor Jabbour commented the City Council in the past has attempted to find various means of
allocating the costs of the project equitably to each resident, and has determined that the best way
of allocating the costs of the project are to assess w hat the City feels is a reasonable cost for the
services provided. Mayor Jabbour stated an assessment hearing will be held once the actual bids are
received for this project and the costs w ill be assessed at that time.
Jane Delaney, 1350 Woodhill Avenue, stated she has spoken w ith Mr. Gappa about this project and
w'as told that there were other options that could be explored instead of installing a gravity flow system.
Delaney inquired whether the possibility of lift stations being utilized had been explored
at all.
Mayor Jabbour stated it was his understanding that option had been ruled out.
Gappa remarked that grinder pumps are cheaper, but the majority of the residents had requested a
gravity flow system.
Mayor Jabbour explained that with a grinder pump system, the water gravitates to the deepest hole
where it enters a large container in the property owner's basement and then is pumped to the City's
sanitaiy sewer system.
A resident inquired about the accuracy of the data collected, noting that her system was cited as
failing, when in fact it is fine.
GafTron stated that sewer systems can be functioning fine one da\ and then a few days later could
be found to be failing. Gaffron remarked that he was not sure what Steve Weekman, the Septic
Inspector, found.
Mayor Jabbour commented that the assessed costs can be put on the tax roll and paid over a ten
or fifteen year period of time rather than in a tump sum at the time of installation if the resident so
chooses.
Kellogg stated all residences in this neighborhood will be hooked up to the Citx-'s sanitary sewer
svstem.
McMillan inquired w hether a resident has the option of hooking up to the sanitary sew er at a later
time if their system is functioning properly at the time the project is commenced.
Page 2
r
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 28.1998
(Orono Orchards Sanitary Sewer Project, continued)
Moorse stated the City, in the past, generally has allowed residents up to 16 months to hook up to the
sanitary sewer system.
Mayor Jabbour stated if the system is failing, the resident has no option but to hook up at the time
of the project, noting the City has not taken a strong position in the past on conforming systems.
Gaffron stated the City has allowed conforming systems a longer period of time to hook up.
Mayor Jabbour suggested the Cit>' may want to review that practice and come up with some firm
guidelines to follow.
Marsha Raiche, 180 Orono Orchard Road, inquired whether the two acre lot size will be maintained.
Mayor Jabbour replied that the lot sizes will not change with this project, and it is the intention of the
City not to allow any sewer project to change the density of the neighborhood.
Mayor Jabbour closed the public hearing at 7:27 p.m.
Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4161 authorizing BRAA to
prepare the final plans and specifications for the Orono Orochards Sanitary Sewer Project and to
advertise for bids. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Mayor Jabbour stated the costs of the sanitaiy sewer project arc directly related to the City's
ability to obtain easements, and it is the goal of the City to have zero legal fees associated with
obtaining easements jointly with the residents. Jabbour commented City Staff is happy to work with
any resident that has questions or concerns regarding the project.
Craig Hertzenberg, 115 Smith Avenue, inquired when the residents will be notified that the project
is approved.
Mayor Jabbour stated the residents will be notified of the public hearing regarding approval of the
project and the costs will be determined at that time.
Kelley stated in his view this project benefits the property owners greatly and is in favor of these
types of projects.
In response to a resident's inquiiy, Gaffron staled the average mound SN Stem, with average use,
should last a minimum of 15 years, and could last 30 years or more.
Raiche inquired whether water hookup could also be done at the same time.
Mayor Jabbour replied that it would cost the residents quite a large sum of money to have water run
to the area, noting that water scr\'icc at this time is only provided to the Highway 12 commercial
district.
Page 3
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 28.1998
(Orono Orchards Sanitary Sewer Project, continued)
A resident expressed concern over the increase in taxes that will be experienced because of the
hookup to City sewer.
Mayor Jabbour stated it is not the desire of the City to increase taxes to the point where it forces
people into moving, but unfortunately the City is not able to selectively give ta.x reductions to certain
residents. Jabbour noted certain grants are available that residents can obtain to help pay for the
hookup.
Moorsc stated they have ongoing talks with the people who administer the CDBG grant program and
will research obtaining grant money through the agency.
Goetten stated there is a deferral available for people w ho are over 65 years of age.
Mayor Jabbour requested the City Administrator to review acquisition of grant monies further.
Kelley stated there is more pressure on the City of Orono to bring the failing and non-conforming
systems up to code.
(2B) 2090 SHORELINE DRIVE SEWER PROJECT - PUBLIC HEARING
A. Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications for 2090 Shoreline Drive Sanitary
Sewer Improvements • Resolution No. 4162.
Mr. and Mrs. Head were present.
Mayor Jabbour noted this item has been placed on tonight's agenda at the request of the Heads.
Kellogg stated the Heads have requested hookup to City sewer, noting this system will be a
pressure system because of the land elevations. This property consists of approximately four
acres, with one acre above floodplain. Presently there are three buildings on the site, with the two
primar)’ residences having their own septic system and the cabin having an outhouse.
The proposed s> stem w ill need to be directionally bored from the property under the lake to an
existing manhole at the intersection of Shoreline Drive and Birch Lane. The estimated costs for
this project arc approximately $34,000.00, which includes cverxihing on the overhead diagram as
well as a $5,000 cost for the grinder station. The grinder station and installation would be the
property owner's responsibility, noting that would be credited against the assessment.
Ma\or Jabbour stated the Heads have been talking about obtaining sewer for their property for some
time now. noting since the property is located on a peninsula, it is easier to direct it towards
Minnetonka Beach due to the closer proximity to the existing City sewer in that area.
Mayor Jabbour stated the City Council came to the conclusion to provide sewer to the two main
homes on the property previously, noting the Heads have requested two buildablc lots. Upon a
request from the Heads, the City Council has visited the property and have decided to allow the
Page 4
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 28,1998
(2090 Shoreline Drive Sewer Project, continued)
two buildablc lots and to proceed with the sewer project.
Mrs. Head stated the property was purchased approximately 88 years ago, noting there have always
been two residences located on the property as well as the cabin, and the land has b^n passed down
through the family since then. Mrs. Head stated they would like to keep the two buildable lots.
Mayor Jabbour stated the property will be limited to two buildable lots, two sewer units, and the City
Council would like to review the property in a few years.
Kelley inquired whether the two lots were one tax parcel and how the taxes were divided between the
two residences.
Gappa stated they are one tax parcel.
Mrs. Head stated they are owners in common.
Flint commented he has reviewed the property and it is in need of sewer. Flint stated it is his position
that the property should remain at rtvo buildable lots with the Heads being assessed for two sewer
units.
Flint stated he would like to have a running covenant on the property that the property' would be
limited to no more than two buildablc sites.
Mayor Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4162, a
Resolution authorizing BRAA to prepare the final plans and specifications for the Head
Sewer Project at 2090 Shoreline Drive and to advertise for bids. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS
Van Erickson stated the new plans for Dickey Park should be rcad> soon and the short court is
currently being installed at Old Cty stal Bay Park and should be completed in a couple of weeks.
Mayor Jabbour stated he has spoken with Fairview Covenant Church and the congregation is in
favor of continuing the dialogue with the City about acquiring access to Saga Hill.
Flint remarked the City Council's packet includes a letter concerning parkland mitigation on the land
adjacent to Holbrook, and suggested the Parks Commission consider working with MnDot to
obtain the Eisingcr property as parkland.
Goetten noted a particular piece of propcrt\' has not been presented yet.
Mayor Jabbour commented there were issues that need to be dealt with regarding Highway 12.
Erickson stated he w ill be meeting with the Sports Commission to discuss future plans for City
parks and the Eisingcr property.
Page 5
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 28,1998
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT - LILI MCMILLAN,
REPRESENTATIVE
McMillan reported the LMCD has relocated its offices to Deephaven, noting the Freshwater
Foundation gave them a generous contribution for relocating.
McMillan reviewed the LMCD budget, noting that the 1999 lev>’ amount will be $151,000.00.
The maximum levj' amount is $191,000.00. McMillan stated $95,000.00 has been
allocated for exotics, noting she is unfamiliar with what that all consists of
Goetten inquired how the LMCD is planning to allocate the money in the budget this year.
McMillan stated the money is distributed to different programs for the betterment of the lake.
McMillan commented the reserves could be utilized more to reduce the levied amount to the cities.
Mayor Jabbour remarked the LMCD budget should be m.ore project orientated and levy for specific
projects rather than a flat levy amount every year.
McMillan stated $40,000.00 has been allocated to overhaul the milfoil har\estcrs this fall.
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - LILI MCMILLAN, REPRESENTATIVE
None
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT
(«4) «2368 KIRK OTTESON, 710 NORTH ARM DRIVE - VARIANCES
Kirk Otteson was present with his architect.
Van Zomcren stated this item was added to the agenda on Friday at the request of the Ottesons.
Van Zomcren stated the City Council had previously approved this application which called for a
second story to be added to the residence. The building inspector has since inspected the property
and has stopped work on the project to allow the Cit\’ Council time to review whether the current
situation meets the original intent of the variances that were granted or is beyond the scope of
the variances and requires flirther consideration by the Planning Commission.
Van Zomcren stated the building inspector has suggested that a new foundation be moved back ten
Page 6
r
i ■ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 28.1998
i !
|i
(^2368 Kirk Otteson, continued)
feet to comply with the average lakcshorc setback.
Mayor Jabbour stated the City Council usually docs not get involved in structural Issues but defers
those matters to the building inspector.
Otteson stated he had a structural engineer rcvic%v the foundation of the house and he has slated
the present foundation is okay to build on, after underpinning along one wall.
Mayor Jabbour suggested Mr. Otteson contact the building inspector and work that matter out between
the two of them.
Moorsc stated the building inspector preferred that a new foundation be built.
Mayor Jabbour stated the issue before the City Council tonight is if we had understood that this house
would be tom doun to the foundation would we still have approved these variances.
Otteson stated the intent of the project remains the same in his view and he is merely trying to
meet current standard constmetion practices. Otteson stated they felt thc\ were in a gray
area as to what they were allowed to do under the application. Otteson remarked the building
inspector has stated the joists are not adequate to build on and need to be replaced which was not
known until some sheetrock was removed from the wall.
Kelley commented it is usualK’ hard to predict what will need to be replaced until the project is
underway, noting he is in favor of the project going forward. Kelley stated if the foundation needs to
be replaced based upon the opinion of the building inspector, then the application should be reviewed.
Goetten stated the safety of the occupants needs to be taken into consideration.
Mayor Jabbour commented minor repair of the foundation is okay.
Van Zomcren stated the Applicants arc planning to have the foundation certified and are attempting
to comply with the City's requirements.
Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to approve #2368, 710 North Arm Drive, allowing
construction to continue as originally approved subject to certification by a structural
engineer that the foundation can be built upon. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(#5) #2401 THOMAS AND MARGARET RADKE, 3424 EASTLAKE STREET -
VARIANCE/RESOLUTION NO. 4163
Thomas and Margaret Radke were present.
Kelley stated he is not opposed to the application, but has concerns about the other property owner
wanting to build a shed on the property in the future Kelley stated the neighbor should be allowed to
construct a similar shed on the property if he so desires
Page 7
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 28,1998
(^2401 Thomas and Margaret Radke, continued)
Radkc stated he docs not have a problem with that, noting he is proposing to construct a 10* by 14'
shed.
Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4163 approving Application
)/2401,3424 Eastlake Street, granting of a variance to allow an accessory building to be
constructed on a lot without a principal structure not to exceed 12' by 15', and reserving the right
for the adjoining neighbor to construct a shed, not to exceed 12' by 15', on the same lot. VOTE:
Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(*#6) #2408 MIKE HILBELINK ON BEHALF OF TED WOLF, 900 WILLOW DRIVE
NORTH - SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION NO. 4164
Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to approve ^2408,900 Willow Drive North, adopting
RESOLUTION NO. 4164, A Resolution Approving a Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement
of a Property Located at 900 Willow Drive North. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(*#7) #2412 STEVE WHITE, 4355 BAYSIDE ROAD - RENEWAL SUBDIVISION -
RESOLUTION NO. 4165
Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to approve #2412,4355 Bayside Road, adopting
RESOLUTION NO. 4165, A Resolution Approving a Metes and Bounds Class I Subdivision
of Property Located at 4355 Bayside Rond. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(•#8) #2414 RANDY AND MARIE STAFFANSON, 1422 PARK DRIVE-VARIANCES- *
RESOLUTION NO. 4166
Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to approve #2414,1422 Park Drive, adopting
RESOLUTION NO. 4166, A Resolution Granting Variances to Allow for the Construction of
a Garage at 1422 Park Drive. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(*#9) #2415 TERRY SANDERS ON BEHALF OF KEVIN KENNEFICK, 3241 CASCO
CIRCLE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 4167
Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Application #2414, adopting
RESOLUTION NO. 4167, a Resolution Granting After-the-Fact Variances and an After-the-Fact
Conditional Use Permit to Allow the Replacement of a Deck and Land Alteration within
75'of the Lakeshore for Landscaping and Rock. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(#10) #2418 ROBERT LUND ON BEHALF OF GRAYDON AND MICHELLE NEWMAN,
1655 BOHN'S POINT ROAD - VARIANCE
Page 8
r
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 28,1998
(1^2418 Robert Lund on behalf of Graydon and Michelle Newman, continued)
Kris HofF, a Representative of Robert Lund Associates Architects, LTD., was present on behalf
of Graydon and Miehelle Newman.
Weinberger stated the Planning Commission has recommended approval of this application which
calls for a variance to the average lakeshore setback and a variance to the hardcover within the
75*-250* lakeshore setback.
Goetten inquired whether the residence was existing at the time the 26.7 percent hardcover was
approved.
Weinberger stated the house was not tom down at that time.
Goetten commented when a residenee is tom down and a new residence constructed, it is the
policy of the City Couneil to have the new residence conform to the 25 percent hardeover limit.
Goetten inquired whether the guest house still exists.
Hoff replied that the guest house still exists.
Weinberger stated there is no conditional use permit for the guest house.
Hoff stated the variance to the hardcover has already been granted and the Applicants are
requesting to revise their plan.
Mayor Jabbour stated the house was removed in October, 1997.
Kelley stated he agreed with Mayor Jabbour and Goetten in their view that hardcover should be
limited to 25 percent on the new residence. Kelley inquired why the guest house was not included in
the application when the Applicants applied for a building permit to construct a new residence.
Weinberger indicated the guest house is an existing structure.
Goetten inquired whether the proposed driveway will be adequate.
Peterson moved, Jabbour seconded, to deny Application ^2418,1655 Bohn's Point Road>
VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(«11) #2419 ROBERT LUND ON BEHALF OF WILLIAM AND ANASTASIA HOEFT, 1725
BOHN’S POINT ROAD - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 4169
Kris Hoff, a Representative of Robert Lund Associates Architects, LTD., was present on behalf of
William and Anastasia Hoeft
Weinberger stated the Applicants arc requesting to construct a new residence on the property.
Hoff commented the Applicants arc proposing to conslmct the residence at this location to avoid
Page 9
r
I
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 28,1998
(#2419 Robert Lund on behalf of William and Anastasia Hoeft, continued)
setting the house on top of a hill which would put the house above the other homes in the area.
Mayor Jabbour stated he is in favor of the variance.
Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to approve Application #2419, adopting
RESOLUTION NO. 4169, A Resolution Granting Variances to Allow for the Construction of
a Residence at 1655 Bohn's Point Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(#12) #2420 ROBERT RYAN, JR., 3535 CHRISTINE DRIVE - VARIANCE
The Applicants were not present.
Jabbour moved, Flint seconded, to deny Application #2420,3535 Christine Drive.
VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Van Zomcren stated the Applicants were notified of tonight's hearing.
(#13) ZONING CODE AMENDMENT - PLUMBING IN ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
Kelley inquired why the City Council was wishing to change the zoning code.
McMillan, Planning Commission Representative, stated the Planning Commission has been working
on this issue in an attempt to give Cit>' Staff some direction on how to deal w ith these applications.
Moorse commented City Staff had requested some guidelines on how to regulate plumbing fixtures
in accessory structures.
Gaffron stated City Staff wanted direction on how to deal with applications requesting the
installation of plumbing fi.xturcs in acccssoiy buildings. Gaffron stated this amendment allows Citv’
Staff to issue permits without restrictions for certain items, issue permits subject to specific restrictions
or covenants for others, and to seek City Council approval whenever a conditional use permit is
required.
Mayor Jabbour inquired whether it is the City Council's intent to allow accessory' structures with
plumbing.
Daniel Kluth, 2801 Fo.x Street, commented he understands the City Council's desire to regulate
these type of structures.
Mayor Jabbour stated this amendment would allow those non-conforming legal accessory structures
that have had the plumbing removed previously to re-install the plumbing.
McMillan stated overall accessory structures pose a problem to tlic Planning Commission and City
Staff and guidelines need to be established for the Citv to follow.
Page 10
-.m J
r
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 28,1998
(^13 Zoning Code Amendment, continued)
Gaffron remarked he does not see a big demand for applications of this tvpe.
Kelley inquired whether plumbing on the outside of a building would fall under this amendment.
Gaffron stated outside plumbing does not fall within this amendment.
Kelley inquired how wastewater plumbing is determined.
Gaffron stated a sink/toilct/shower unit is classified as wastewater plumbing, for instance.
Kelley inquired whether the amendment addresses whether the septic system can handle the
additional plumbing.
Gaffron stated that additional language could be incorporated into the amendment if the City Council
so desired.
Kelley suggested the plumbing in acccssoiy structures be limited to lots that exceed two acres in
size.
Mayor Jabbour stated he has the same concerns as Kelley.
Gaffron stated he understands the concerns of the City Council and language can be incorporated to
limit it to lots that exceed two acres in size.
Kelley recommended the amendment be redrafted to inelude that language and to allow the City
Council additional time to review the proposed amendment.
Mayor Jabbour stated it is the philosophy of the City Couneil to take amendments to ordinances very
seriously and to proceed cautiously.
Gaffron stated he will have the proposed language incorporated into the document.
(#14) #2389 DANIEL KLUTH, 2801 FOX STREET - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/
VARIANCES
Daniel Kluth was present.
Weinberger stated the Planning Commission has recommended this application be approved contingent
upon approval by the City Council of the Zoning Code Amendment.
Weinberger stated the Applicant is proposing to install one toilet and one sink in the building
which will be used as a game building.
Kluth remarked he is planning to have the building inspected this week, noting the building will be
used strictly as a place for his kids to play and to house a train set. Kluth stated he built the
Page 11
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 28.1998
(M2389 Daniel Kluth, continued)
accessory structure because he was unable to add on to the existing residence due to some drainage
problems that would be created. This property consists of 2.71 acres. Kluth stated he will comply
with whatever restrictions the City Council deems necessary.
Kelle>* remarked the City Council cannot act on this application until the ordinance amendment is
approved.
Kluth stated the pipes have been run to the outside of the building but arc not connected to any
fixture.
Goetten inquired when the amendment can be ready for review.
Gaffron stated the amendment will be ready for review by the next meeting.
Mayor Jabbour stated the Cih- Council cannot approve a conditional use permit for something
that does not currently exist in the Citv Codes.
Flint stated he is in favor of waiting until the amendment is approved.
Jabbour moved, no second, to approve Application #2389, granting of a
Conditional Use Permit contingent upon approval of the Zoning Code Amendment
Regulating Plumbing in Accessory Structures.
Kluth stated he docs not need approval for the guest house but merely the plumbing fixtures.
Mayor Jabbour withdrew his motion.
Weinberger stated the deadline for this application is October 15th.
Kluth stated he will request another extension if necessary.
Jabbour moved, Peterson seconded, to table Application #2389, 2801 Fox Street,
to the next City Council meeting. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(#15) APPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION - ROAD ACCESS, 3410 NORTH
SHORE DRIVE
Gaffron stated Mr. Regan has applied for a building permit to make improvements to his property.
The proposed work meets all setback and hardcover requirements; howev er, issuance of that
building permit has been delayed based on Mr Regan's proposal to construct a second driveway
access off of Tonkawa Road using Jim Render's private road.
Gaffron stated when the subdivision for Render was reviewed by City Council, Staff was unaware
that Regan's old garage was being accessed via Render's driveway because access to the North
Page 12
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 28.1998
(^15 Appeal of Administrative Decision, continued)
Shore driveway is impossible due to an existing deck between Regan's house and the east lot line.
Render was unaware of the intended change in use by Regan at the time the subdivision was granted.
The road approved for the subdivision is a substandard road and was intended as a driveway to serve
only Render's three proposed homes. City Council approved a 16 foot wide road.
Gaffron noted Render could not be present at tonight's meeting.
Kelley commented he raised this issue at the time the subdivision was being approved and was told
that access in the back was not necessary.
Gaffron stated if access to Render's road is granted, the City' Council could make it subject to
Render granting the existing easement beneficiaries the right to use his road as they have in the past,
and subject to discontinuing Regan's access off of North Shore Drive. Staff recommends that the road
be widened to 24 feet, noting Render has requested that the parties share in the costs of improving the
road.
Mayor Jabbour suggested the two parties get together to tr\' to resolve some of these issues, noting
it is not the intent of the City Council to get involved in property owner disputes.
Regan stated he was not aware that he would need access off Render's road until after the
subdivision w'as approved. Regan commented he had the understanding it was going to be a public
road.
Goetten stated she voted for the 16 foot road in light of the fact that only three properties would have
access off of it, noting that Mr. Regan did not raise these concerns at the time the subdivision was
approved. Goetten noted the neighbors will need to be notified about the possible change.
Regan stated he will discuss this matter with Render.
ENGINEER REPORT
(#17) DISCUSS SANITARY SEWER SERVICE FOR 2140 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH
Gappa stated City Staff has received a letter from Woodlands Home requesting hookup to City
sewer because of septic system failure.
Gaffron stated the options for replacement sites arc extremely limited.
Gappa stated a rough estimate for this project is approximatety $25,000.00, with no formal estimates
being obtained. A prcliminaiy review shows that gravity sewer serv ice is feasible for this
property' or a grinder pump force main s\ stem if the costs arc too prohibitive.
Phillips stated they have had their present sewer sv stem examined by experts who have
concluded that the antibiotics and other drugs that ar; flushed down the system arc causing the
Page 13
r
)I
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 28.1998
(#17 Sanitary Sewer Service, continued)
system to fail.
Kelley stated he is in favor of bringing City' sewer to the Woodlands, and suggested asking the
church whether they would also be interested in hooking up to City sewer at the same time to help
share in the costs.
Mayor Jabbour commented the City will not be sharing in the costs of the project. It was
indicated that the Metropolitan Council would have to be contacted regarding the sewer expansion.
MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT
Goetten stated while she was at the Ciystal Bay Post Office, she observed people still parking in
front of the post office which restricts a person's line of vision as they are exiting the parking lot.
Goetten commented there are safety' concerns that should be addressed and the City perhaps should
do some striping to prevent parking on the roadway.
Kelley inquired whether annexation with the City of Long Lake was still being discussed.
Mayor Jabbour stated he has been approached about annexation by a property owner, but in his
opinion this matter should wait until the property owner is present.
Kelley commented he has received numerous calls on the budget, noting there was a surplus in
the 1997 operating budget. Kelley inquired what that surplus was.
Moorse stated it was approximately $200,000.00
Kelley' suggested utilizing some of the surplus for projects that are a one-time project such as the
comprehensive plan rather than trying to levy for it.
Kelley’ also inquired whether directional boring will be a viable option for the City of Orono in an
effort to keep costs down.
Kellogg stated directional boring is suited for hilly land.
Kelley suggested the City start planning now for the new technological advances that are being
made.
Mayor Jabbour stated he has tried to discuss the long-term vision of the City with members of the
Planning Commission, and the City should attempt to focus on the two acre districts rather than
micro-managing the City.
Mayor Jabbour suggested scheduling a meeting for industrial users to give them an opportunity' to
inform the Cit\’ Council about what they would like to see happen with the Highway 12 comprehensive
plan amendment.
Page 14
m »l- -II
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 28.1998
(Mayor/Council Report, continued)
GafFron stated he will provide that information to the City Council members for their review.
Flint suggested the City Council continue to look at the mitigation of Holbrook Park as an addition to
the Orono park system, noting this is an excellent opportunity to enhance the City's relationship with
Long Lake. Flint also suggested working with Long Lake on the Eisingcr property.
(#16) ACCEPT BID FOR TWO PORTABLE ELECTRIC GENERATORS
Gappa reviewed his September 28, 1998 memorandum regarding the purchase of two portable electric
generators to be used for the emergency operation of sanitary sewer lift stations during power outages.
Kelley inquired what these generators will be capable of running.
Gappa stated the generators w ill run any of the City’s lift stations and will help the neighboring areas in
case of a storm.
Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to authorize the purchase of two 50KW portable electric
generators from the Katolight Corporation at a cost not to exceed $40,341.00.
VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(#18) BONESTROO ASSOCIATES - COUNTY ROAD 15 STUDY
Flint stated from the language on Page 3, paragraph 1. this analysis should involve the local east/west
roads in Orono and how they would fit into the overall transportation system.
Glenn Cook stated the> looked at the central area and anal> zed how that would affect County
Road 15.
Kelley stated he thought the study was premature and the Cit\’ should wait with this analysis until
County Road 15 is completed.
Goetten stated the City Council should dctenninc what to do in the interim to address the safety
concerns related to Countv Road 15 until County Road 15 is completed.
Mayor Jabbour commented that he has received numerous complaints from the residents about
access onto County Road 15, noting that this road should be looked at for safety reasons. Mayor
Jabbour inquired whether the City Council wished to proceed with this study.
Flint and Goetten replied yes, they wished to continue with the study. Goetten remarked that there
also should be some stoplights or stop signs along County Road 15 to help break up the flow of
traffic.
Kelley inquired whether it was good City planning to have drivers make a left-hand turn onto
Countv Road 15 during certain times of the day.
Page 15
I !
■
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 28.1998
County Road 15 during certain times of the day.
(tf 18 Bonestroo Associates • County Road 15 Study, continued)
Mayor Jabbour stated the study \vill help the City determine what is do-able.
Flint commented he would like to see a broader proposal that addresses the whole picture,
It was the concensus of the City Council that the study should address the whole issue.
Peterson moved, Flint seconded, to authorize Bonestroo & Associates to continue with
their analysis of County Road 15. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(#19) CITY FACILITIES ROOF REPAIR
Mayor Jabbour stated he has spoken with the builder and architect about the roof leak problems
experienced on the Cit>' Hall and City Council Chambers.
Gappa stated ice builds up on the roof and freezes which needs to be removed and drained properly.
Gappa remarked they will be taking pictures of the roof in case of a dispute down the road, noting
the original builders are out of business. Gappa stated this problem needs to be corrected soon before
major damage is done.
Flint moved, Goetten seconded, to authorize roof repairs on the City facilities at an
estimated cost of $60,000.00, to be funded from the Building Capital Outlay Fund, and to
amend the Building Capital Outlay Fund budget to reflect this expenditure.
VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT
(*«20) APPOINTMENT OF 1998 GENERAL ELECTION JUDGES - RESOLUTION
NO. 4170
Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4170, a Resolution
Appointing Election Judges for the General Election to be Held November 3,1998.
VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(«21) ANIMAL IMPOUND FACILITY
Moorsc stated the Wright County Animal Shelter located cast of Delano will be closing down in
the near future and the City of Orono is actively seeking another facility to meet the City's needs.
Moorsc reported the Humane Society is planning to build a new facility just w est of Rockford
which w ill not meet the City's needs regarding case of access. One possible site is the building
that formerly housed the Orono Police Department located on Willow Drive in Long Lake.
Page 16
r
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 28.1998
(1^21 Animal Impound Facility, continued)
Kelley inquired how many cities would be involved in this endeavor.
Moorse stated there is a total of 10 to 12 cities that are interested.
Mayor Jabbour suggested the City look at the old nurseiy building on Highway 6 and Highway 12
Moorse stated a meeting has been scheduled for Friday, September 25, to discuss the building on
Willow Drive.
Flint moved, Goetten seconded, to authorize City Staff to further pursue the building lease
option in cooperation with the other lake area cities. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1, KeHcy
opposed.
CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT
(*W2) LICENSES
There were no licenses.
(*#23) BILLS
Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account.
VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
ADJOURNMENT
Jabbour moved, second by Goetten, to adjourn the meeting at 11:45 p.m.
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Major
Page 17
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
COUNCIL M'££T!MG
OCT 1 'I
CITY or oacNO
Date: October 9,1998
Department Approval: Administrator Approval:
NaiB£'; Michael P. Gaflron
Title: Senior Planning Coordinator
Item No.
Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: #2404 Otten Brothers Nursery, 2350 West Wayzata Boulevard - Commercial
Site Plan Approval (Amend PUD Agreement) - Adopt Ag>reement Language
List of Exhibits
A" PUD Amendment Agreement
B - Council Minutes September 14,1998
C - Letter from Patrick Pugh October 6,1998
On September 14 the Council voted 5-0 to approve the commercial site plan review application for
the Ottpc Brothers Nursery proposed greenhouse addition. That action included approval of the
greenhouse addition as proposed, relocation of the existing canopy structure as proposed, allowing
the recently constructed entrance monuments in their current location, and allowing the retaining
wall/loading dock to remain within Outlot C subject to an agreement that that Otten Brothers
Nursery will remove the retaining wall/loading dock if the road is constructed in Outlot C.
Approval was subject to two additional conditions identified by Council:
1.
2.
The greenhouse shall not have 'production greenhouse' lighting, so that the impact
on the surrounding neighborhoods is minimized.
Mr. Otten shall work with City staff and the neighboring property owners to
determine what additional screening/buffering is to be provided by Otten.
The City Attorney has drafted the attached "Amendment Number 1 to Planned Unit Development
No. 1 Agreement for East Willow Woods". The agreement incorporates the conditions of approval
noted above.
Screening/Buffering
Staff received a call and a letter this week from Patrick Pugh, the property owner directly across
Dickey Lake Drive from Otten Brothers, who was not able to attend the September 14 Council
meeting. Mr. Pugh reports he has met with Mr. Otten regarding additional screening and/or
#2404 Often Brothers Nursery
October 9,1998
Page 2
buffering, and he is not at all satisfied with the response. There is apparently a clear difference of
opinion between Pugh and Often as to the extent of additional fencing and/or vegetation that should
be installed.
Council's approval action left this matter to be resolved by a joint effort of Often, Pugh and staff.
Staff is recommending (and has included in the Amendment language as item 5) a requirement that
Often post a letter of credit to ensure that whatever is agreed to is completed. There is no 'plan at
this time, however, and staff has not met with Pugh or Often individually or together. Oft^
applied for a building permit, and would like to start construction as soon as the Building Official
has completed his plan review. The letter of credit seems to be the most prudent method to get the
greenhouse started while assuring that screening/buffering will proceed as well. The amount of e
letter of credit has not been established, however, because there is no new approved plan.
Staff Recommendation
Adopt or direct staff to revise the attached Amendment Number 1 To Planilgd Unit PgVglPpmg Pt
No- 1 Agreement for East Willow Woods.
r
CITY OF ORONO
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 TO
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NO. I AGREEMENT FOR
East Willow Woods
Clifford L. Otten. Developer
THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered in this______^day of 1998,
by and between the City of Orono, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State
of Minnesota (hereinafter called "City") and Clifford Otten, his heirs, successors and assigns
(hereinafter called "Developer").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Developer entered into an Agreement dated April 23,1990 (hereinafter
called "Agreement") to develop East Willow Woods as a Planned Unit Development on all the
terms and conditions set forth in that certain Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Developer has requested an Amendment to the Agreement (hereinafter
"Amendment 1") to allow for construction of a greenhouse addition adjacent to the existing
principal structure and has requested to move the existing canopy: and
WHEREAS, the Developer has requested that such Amendment 1 further allow for
construction of a loading dock within Outlot C, East Willow Woods; and
WHEREAS, the Developer has requested that such Amendment 1 further allow the
entrance monuments constructed within Lots 1 and 2 East Willow Woods at the site entrance from
Highway 12 to remain as constructed; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has granted £q)proval for such Amendment 1, after a public
hearing and consideration and recommendation by the Planning Commission,
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, and of the mutual promises and
conditions hereinafter contained, it is hereby agreed as follows:
1.Property description : Property description tor Amendment 1 is the same as that for the
Agreement.
Initials of Developer
Initials of City Clerk
Page 1 of 5
L
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Zoning: Property continues to be zoned as a Planned Unit Development under the
Orono plaimed unit development ordinance with underlying B-6 zoning.
Permitted Uses: Amendment 1 allows the greenhouse addition, relocated canopy and
entrance monuments as shown on attached Exhibit A. In order to minimize lighting
impacts outside the property, greenhouse shall not have production lighting.
Conditionally Permitted Use: Amendment 1 allows the loading dock in the location
shown on attached Exhibit A to remain in place and used until such time as the City
determines that the road easement on which it is situated shall be opened. If the City
then requires that the loading dock be removed. Developer shall do so at Developer's
expense.
Additional Screening: Developer agrees to provide such landscape screening and/or
fence between the adjoining property and the Developer's property as the City may
require. The City, in making its determination, will consider the views of the
Developer and the adjoining landowners. Developer shall post a letter of credit, in a
form acceptable to the City, in the amount of to ensure compliance
with this requirement The screening plan required by the City will be shown as an
Exhibit which shall be attached to this agreement as Exhibit B, and which will be
enforceable consistent with Paragraph 9 of this Amendment 1 .
Site Access: Site access remains unchanged from the Agreement.
Building Design and Construction: Building design and construction of the
greenhouse and relocated canopy in Amendment 1 shall be constructed according to
the plans on file with the City of Orono.
Height: The height of the greenhouse shall be 18 feet. The height of the canopy shall
be feet.
9. Signs: The signs and signage shall not be changed from the requirements of the
Agreement.
10. Compliance: The obligations of compliance in the Agreement are extended to include
this Amendment 1.
11 . Binding Effect: The binding effect of the Agreement is extended to include this
Amendment 1.
12. Notices: The notice provisions of the Agreement are extended to include this
Amendment 1.
Initials of Developer
Initials of City Clerk
Page 2 of 5
h
13. Tncoqioration bv Reference: The plans, specifications and contracts for the
improvements in the Agreement and for this Amendment 1 are made part of this
Amendment 1.
14. Disclaimer bv Citv: The Disclaimer in the Agreement is extended to this
Amendment 1.
15. Hold Harmless and Indemnification: The Hold Harmless and Indemnification of the
Agreement is extended to this Amendment 1 .
16. Remedy for Default: The Remedy for default in the Agreement is extended to this
Amendment 1.
17. rontrolling Agreement: The terms ofthis Amendment 1 will first control its reading,
and it shall be read together with the terms of the Agreement. These two documents
shal 1 control to the extent that there is any difference or ambiguity between them and
other agreements between the City and the Developer.
Initials of Developer
Initials of City Clerk
Page 3 of 5
r
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Developer have caused this agreement to
be duly executed and to become effective on the day and year first above written.
In Presence of:CITY OF ORONO
BY:
(Mayor)
BY:
(City Clerk)
DEVELOPER
Clifford L. Otten
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 1998 by Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor, and Linda S. Vee, City Clerk, of
the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
Initials of Developer
Initials of City Clerk
Page 5 of 5
J
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 14,1998
PLANNING COM^^SS10N COMMENTS - JANICE BERG, REPRESENTATIVE
Planning Commission Chair Janice Berg had no comments.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Jean Bredeson, owner of a small consulting business in Wayzata, would like to relocate her business
from Wayzata to 850 Wayzata Blvd., Wayzata Christian Center. She questioned Council regarding
the current CUP, and whether her business would qualify under the current CUP.
Mayor Jabbour replied that the use of the facility is restricted to residential use, and that schools and
churches are an allowed use. Mayor Jabbour also stated that there is no provision for a CUP for her
business.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT
(#4) #2383 GARY AND CHRISTINE VALERIUS, 3750 BAYSIDE ROAD - FINAL PLAT
APPROVAL - RESOLUTION NO. 4156
Gary and Christine Valerius were present.
Moved by Goetten, seconded by Peterson, to a adopt Resolution No. 4156 approving the final plat
of Valerius Addition for Gary and Christine Valerius at 3750 Bayside Road. Vote: Ayes 5, nays
0.
(#5) #2404 OTTEN BROTHERS NURSERY, 2350 WEST WAYZATA BLVD -
COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL
Cliff Otten was present.
Van Zomeren reported that the request by the applicant is for a commercial site plan approval for
construction of a greenhouse addition adjacent to the existing principal structure.
Otten noted from Gaffron’s report that the "agreement is mute as to uses of Outlot C, hence the
retaining wall/loading dock must be considered an amendment to the agreement". Otten suggested
that if the agreement is mute as to Outlot C, it should be acceptable to put a retaining wall on it.
Otten felt the loading dock is screened adequately from the neighboring properties. He also noted
that the location of the loading dock is where they have been unloading the trucks for the past 8
years. Otten offered to sign an agreement with the City that when and if a road is constructed on
Outlot C, he would remove the retaining wall.
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 14,1998
(#5) #2404 OTTEN BROTHERS NURSERY, CONTINUED
Kelley stated he is fme with the loading dock location.
Mayor Jabbour asked Public Services Director Greg Gappa if the loading dock/retaining wall would
be a problem when the City declares the road on Outlot C opened.
Gappa stated the concern is the impact of having the loading dock closer to the residential area.
Outlot C was dedicated for a future road and is currently serving as a buffer.
Goetten noted during her site inspection that the location seemed logical for the loading dock.
Gappa concurred with Goetten, but felt there may be zoning issues to look at.
Mayor Jabbour stated Mr. Often came in to ask for a Commercial Site Plan Review only for the
greenhouse, but the only thing discussed was the loading area which has existed for the past 8 years.
Joel Walvatne, 710 Dickey Lake Drive, inquired about the screening between Outlot C and his
property. He stated that his concern is that commercial use is getting closer to his property line.
Mayor Jabbour replied that he had visited the property line and saw it to be of a thick matted green
blanket of vegetation consisting of a variety of evergreens, small dogwoods and scrub bushes.
Walvatne noted for the Council a letter dated April 24, 1990 from Cliff Oftehs attorney Robert
Mitchell. He asked the City to review #7 of the letter, which stated "with Cliff giving you the land
to the west of your site you are assured that there will be no commercial use next to your home and
instead that the commercial use will all be to the south and across the frontage road, if it is built.
Mayor Jabbour replied that his understanding of Mr. Mitchell's letter is that Mr. Often traded the
triangular piece of property for Mr. Walvatne's piece (that section within Outlot C) ^uring that the
triangular piece will not be commercial. Mr. Often is allowing the City to drive through his
driveway, to get to the City Well located on Outlot B. If Often takes his loading dock and puts it in
the comer of Lot 1, Block 1, he might end up forcing the City to open the road designated as Outlot
C to be able to get to the City Well on Outlot B. No one will benefit from the City openmg this road.
Kelley questioned the lot area coverage in the B-6 zone.
Often replied the lot area coverage is 17 to 23%.
Kelley questioned the lighting effect the greenhouse will have at night.
Often replied the greenhouse is not a production greenhouse, it will be a sales greenhouse.
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MELTING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 14,1998
(#5) #2404 OTTEN BROTHERS NURSERY, CONTINUED
Kelley questioned the screening issue along Dickey Lake Drive where the trucks are parked. Otten
stated he reviewed the area that is visible from Dickey Lake Drive. After review, the area was
cleaned up. When Otten talked with Mr. Pugh, his issue was more the back ends of the trucks. More
plantings or a fence was discussed, but no conclusion was made. Otten stated he was not opposed
to adding more screening along this area.
Flint commented on his review of the property. The front of the property was very nice and inviting,
but along Dickey Lake Drive it is not.
Otten replied that he would plant another row of trees behind where the trucks are parked.
Moved by Kelley, seconded by Goetten, to approve Application No. 2404, for a commercial site plan
review and amendment to P.U.D. to allow the existing entrance monuments at the eastern entrance
to remain, and to allow the loading dock to remain subject to an agreement that Otten Brothers
Nursery will remove the retaining wall/loading dock without compensation if the road is constructed
on Outlot C for the property located at 2350 West Wayzata Boulevard for Otten Brothers Nursery
subject to the recommendations of the Planning Commission outlined in the report dated August 20,
1998, and with the following conditions: 1) no production greenhouse lighting; 2) Mr. Otten to work
with City staff and the neighboring properties to determine additional screening to be provided by
Mr. Otten. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
The City Council also directed City staff to work with Mr. Otten regarding access to the City well
(#6) #2406 GERALD & SANDRA ERICKSON, HAVING AN INTEREST IN 2683 CASCO
POINT ROAD - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 4157
Gerald and Sandra Erickson were present.
Weinberger reported the applicants are proposing to remove the existing house and rebuild a new
home with the intent to keep the existing boat house. Originally the applicants proposed to exceed
the lot coverage and hardcover within the 75-250' of the lakeshore. Upon the Planning Commission
recommendation that they could build a principal structure on the lot without requiring any
variances, the applicants have revised their plan slightly. The applicants met with staff and
submitted a new plan that nearly meets the requirements of the zoning code. The newly submitted
plan has hardcover at about 26%.
‘M .
r
Patrick Pugh
725 Dickey Lake Drive
Orono. MN 55356
612-449-6054
October 6, 1998
Rli: Olten Brothers Nursery Greenhouse Addition
QC1 0 5
Or OHONO
Gabriel Jabbour-Mayor
City of Orono
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay. MN 55323
Dear Mr. Jabbour:
On August 17, 1998,1 sent a letter to Elizabeth Van Zomeren expressing my concerns about Otten’s latest
plans for expansion and the inadequacy of Otten's present facilities from my perspective regarding both
noise and business operations screening. As indicated in a “Request for Council Action ” dated August 20,
1998, the council requested on item 6., page 4, that “Applicant to meet with neighbors and establish an
enhanced screening plan for Council review and approval; such plan to potentially include additional tree
plants, fencing, and/or materials storage screening.” The Council was then to direct the City Attorney to
draft documentation to amend the PUD Agreement, as a condition of tlie proposed construction. That is
the last correspondence I've had on the matter.
Subsequently, 1 have met with Mr. Cliff Oticn twice concerning screening. The first meeting concluded
with an agreement to provide me with options including fencing and ''•.her screening of the motor pool and
landscape operating area. The second, very unsatisfactory meeting, t • ncluded with Otten reneging on any
agreement to provide adequate screening for the motor pool, something he •’ad initially, promised to
/.’rmer residents, at an initial planning commission meeting, August 21, 19 - ‘ 'n our meeting, initiated by
Wc • on October 6, Otten stated his only attempt at screening would be a 30' or 40' six foot fence hiding
<-'>ne planter pots. Additionally, he suggested that if 1 wanted to shield my property from his landscaping
operation, to plant a hedge along Dickey Lake Drive. 1 told him that suggestion had no merit after which
he accused me of trying to run or ruin his operation, neither of which, 1 think a reasonable person would
have suggested. The meeting canie to a close with Otten saying he would build a fence to cover some
planting pots and other landscaping materials but tliat was all he was prepared to do.
Since. Otten has decided to be unreasonable in my opnion. 1 am writing this letter to you and the Cit)’
Council in an effort to outline my grievances in tlie hope you can either mediate or arbitrate the matter.
Those grievances are as follows:
1. Promised screening in front of Otten’s motor pool is inadequate after ten years of growth.
2. Otten's materials storage is in plain sight of the Dickey Lake Drive, directly across from both my
properties.
3. Otten’s landscaping operations utilize both heavy loading equipment and larger trucks in those
landscaping operations creating an enormous amount of disturbance from engine noise, backup waniing
Gabriel Jabbour-Mayor
RE: Ollcn Brolhers Nursery Greenhouse Addilion
Page 2
October 6, 1998
beepers and dropping tailgates. This noise can begin as early as 5:00 AM, continue throughout the day
and last until after 9:00 PM.
4. Otten’s paging system is a series of loudspeakers which, obviously, project noise outside of Otten’s
property and continue throughout business hours.
In short, it appears as a condition of Otten’s business operations, 1 am required to have a materials dump
and motor pool in plain sight of my property and suffer the noise of both Otten’s retail and landscaping
operations. Frankly, 1 can’t believe the planning commission would have approved Otten’s landscaping
operations, particularly with regard to its current magnitude and within the city limits, had they understood
what those operations entailed. Had I known, I can tell you 1 would not have bought the property.
However, what’s done is done. My interest, now, involves the mitigation of Otten’s business effect on my
peace of mind and property value. 1 have been willing to compromise toward that goal. However, my
patience is wearing thin and depending on my time, temper and resources, this matter will be settled with
your intercession or by the court. Hopefully, you and the City Council can come up with an appropriate
remedy to the situation which will satisfy both Ottens and myself and spare us all from further attention to
the matter. Certainly, 1 would consider any addition to the scope of Otten’s operations on the present site,
at this point in time, to be ill advised.
I am at your disposal to discuss the matter in person.
Sincetely,>.—
Patrick Pugh
cc: Otten Brothers Nursery
COUWCIL
OCT 1 2 1998
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION crn'crcR'/^ij
DATE: 10/9/98
ITEM NO.:
Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section:
Name Paul Weinberger Zoning
Title Assistant Zoning Administrator
Item Description:#2418 Robert Lund on behalf of Graydon and Michelle Newman
1655 Bohn's Point Road
Variances--Public Hearing
Zoning District:LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 Acre)
Lot Area:70,881 square feet (1.62 acres)
The City Council voted 5 to 0 to deny the variances requested by Robert Lund on behalf of Graydon
and Michelle Newman, 1655 Bohns Point Road, to allow an average lakeshore setback variance for
a pool structure and an average lakeshore setback for a 30' tower to be constructed on the lakeside
of the home for a first floor open porch with office space above. The applicant also intended to
receive a hardcover variance to allow 11,605 s.f. of coverage in the 75-250’ lakeshore setback.
Mr. Lund x^-ill be present at the October 12, 1998 City Council meeting to request clarification of
the action taken on September 28, 1998 to deny his request on behalf of Graydon and Michelle
Nevraian. He has submitted several exhibits that are attached to this memo for discussion on
Monday night.
2.
A residence existed on the lot at the time the City Council granted a hardcover
variance on July 28, 1997 (DWG-1). The City Council granted a variance for
hardcover to not exceed 11,603.5 s.f. (26.7%) meeting the conditions that were
legally existing on the property prior to removal of the proposed residence.
The City Council granted variances on July 28, 1997 to allow the residence to
encroach into the average lakeshore setback, and to allow 11,606 s.f. (26.7%) of
hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback where 10,850 s.f. (25%) is allowed and
11,606 s.f. (26.7%) existed at the time of application. Approval was in accordance
with the survey and site plan submitted with Zoning Application #2265 on file with
the City of Orono Department of Building and Zoning, dated February 12 1996
(DWG-2).
3. City Staff approved a site plan change to allow a smaller footprint to be located
farther from the lakeshore and issued a building permit on July 15, 1998. Staff
determined that the revised plan met the intent of die City Council approval.
The new house plan removed a smaller tower structure, and a gazebo with outdoor
walkway. The home location was turned slightly to face the lake more directly
(Building Permit Approval - Plan A).
5. The request considered at the September 28,1998 meeting would include adding the
tower that was removed from the plan at the time the building permit was issued and
adding a swimming pool that would require hardcover and average lakeshore setback
variances (DWG-3).
The applicants are allowed the hardcover granted by variance on July 28,1997 (amended 7/15/98)
to allow the building envelope and site plan previously approved because a building permit was
issued before the variances expired. The building permit is valid until July 15,1999.
Application: The applicants had proposed to construct an addition to the residence with c
pool terrace on the property meeting all yard requirements. The house would be located 9T from
the lakeshore, encroaching 88' into the average laJ>.: hore setback. The edge of the pool terrace
would be located 114' from the lakeshore, encu/c^rvv;.i^ -i-V into the average lakeshore setback. A
variance is required from the average lakeshore setback to allow for these structures. The property
is located on a point causing the average lakeshore setback distance to be pushed back on the lot.
This application required the following variances:
1 . Average Lakeshore Setback. The house would encroach 88' into the Average Lakeshore
Setback and the pool terrace would encroach 44' into the Average Lakeshore Setback.
2. Hardcover within the 75-250' lakeshore setback. Last year the applicant received a variance
to allow 26.7% hardcover. They have presented a revised plan with the same amount of hardcover
that was approved last year. They also plan to remove a play house that is located within a required
side yard setback.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
To approve or amend the enclosed denial resolution,
ATTACHMENTS
A. Denial Resolution
B. DWG-1 - Site Plan before demolition
C. DWG-2 - Approved Site Plan (July 28,1998)
D. Plan A - Building Permit Approved Site Plan (July 15,1998)
E. DWG-3 - Proposed Site Plan - Zoning Application #2418 - Denied September 28,1998
F. Proposed Dwelling Photo
G. Elevation Plans (1997 Approval - 1998 Denial)
H. Elevation Plans for proposed structure
I. 1997 Tower Footprint
J. 1998 Tower Footprint
K. Driveway Turning Radius Study
L. Site Hardcover
M. Property Photos
4 ^
A RESOLUTION DENYING
VARIANCES TO
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 (B);
SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (C) (6);
SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2;
SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L) (2)
FILE #2418
WHEREAS, Graydon Newman and Michelle Newman (hereinafter "the
applicants") are owners of the property located at 1655 Bohns Point Road within the City of
Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows:
Lot 6, Block 1, Auditor ’s Subdivision No. 349, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter
"the property"); and
WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning
Commission held a public hearing on September 21, 1998, at which times all persons desiring
to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and
WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal
Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C) (6) to
allow the construction of an addition encroaching 88' into the average lakeshore setback and
a pool to encroach 44' into the average lakeshore setback where no encroachment is normally
allowed; and Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (2) to allow
11,605 s.f. (26.7%) hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback area where 10,850 s.f. (25%)
is allowed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
Page 1 of 4
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
FINDINGS
This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2418.
The property is located in the LR-IB, One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning
District.
The City Council granted variances on July 28, 1997 to allow the residence to
encroach into the average lakeshore setback, and to allow 11,606 s.f. (26.7%) of
hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback where 10,850 s.f. (25%) is allowed
and 11,606 s.f. (26.7%) existed at the time of application. Approval was in
accordemce with the survey and site plan submitted with Zoning Application
#2265 on file with the City of Orono Department of Building and Zoning, dated
February 12, 1996.
A residence existed on the lot at the time the City Council granted a hardcover
variance on July 28, 1997. The City Council granted a variance for hardcover
to not exceed 11,603.5 s.f. (26.7%) meeting the conditions that were legally
existing on the property prior to removal of the proposed residence.
City Staff approved a site plan change to allow a smaller footprint to be located
farther from the lakeshore and issued a building permit on July 15, 1998. Staff
determined that the revised plan met the intent of the City Council approval.
The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property have
changed since the original house has been removed. The approval to allow
26.7% hardcover was granted due to 26.7% hardcover existing on the property
at the time of application. The conditions that existed at the time the hardcover
variances were granted have changed. Subsiquently, the home has been removed
and the new foundation and a portion of the first level of the new residence are
complete. The request for additional hardcover on August 19, 1998 occurred
following the removal of the preexisting house.
The applicants are allowed the hardcover granted by variance on July 28, 1997
(amended 7/15/98) to allow the building envelope and site plan previously
approved because a building permit was issued before the variances expired.
The building permit is valid until July 15, 1999.
Page 2 of 4
8. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the
applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of
the community.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
denies variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) and Section 10.56,
Subdivision 16 (C) (6) to dlow the construction of an addition encroaching 88' into the average
lEikeshore setback and a pool to encroach 44' into the average lakeshore setback where no
encroachment is normally allowed; and Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56,
Subdivision 16 (L) (2) to allow 11,605 (26.7%) hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback area
where 10,850 (25%) is normally allowed.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 28th day of September, 1998.
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
ss.
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 28th day of
September, 1998, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of
Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the
City.
Notary Public
Page 3 of 4
r
{
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
ss.
)
On this day of , 199 ___, before
me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared
known to me to be the person(s) described
in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed
the same as his (their) free act and deed.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS*
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this day of , 199 ___, before
me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared
known to me to be the person(s) described
in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed
the same as his (their) free act and deed.
Notary Public
Page 4 of 4
Vv
%
%
I
%
^ •
IV
'U./
■''.F<V«1
:r'>^
,*Jji.kA''»v.
•h;BStki ^ '
- \
\
N
N.
« >••(/*J
\
;
j.__ s*
\
V- r--i^ •, . J \
V /i.Vv^'....., ■
' ^er:. ■■■-'/y!/>'•
^ *
.-
I#^v.\
>J
\
I V 71.
/
fn
\
X K,
X
«• •
X—rv,i
I
V
/,
\\
1 /
•S./i yw
/^./
/U^-. '-^f '<^c::. - ''f// '"//^/•'Xy>x^//-^/// /y^X'Xi' >'' •• ■• X /' y /^ / / / /y^yJ/
I ■ ^ /^ . / / / ,7 /, / /X X
N I /
//////.
« /
/
/
/
^ J
f y.
. ^
/
I
7
V y ^N ^ A'
X
3 /
%
N
^ t 7/7
V<o'«s 7
g r*o
s.?l
ISi« ■< s’ 5
tf V B 00 M BI- “ a5^g
-4 sT «
“1 "i
4^
^1
HI
«w>>
I- ^
!'
u
i\<i
y /
Vv \
•i Z'
z 1^4
M
ll
\
V-'N -• /
?\ys♦ .\I V'%'^7/Z4,f< X '-^ / A\m
NV>
/ X
K \
•l«^
^
W /\
% »
f^:i
- y.
/V
N-AN 'v: *.
/ ./
\
Z y
►A . ^ -"V yV 'A\\z
xv».:
L « •
. ... V / .
ci:'-}^ n
\ 'K.
><
• V
.3
i*\
\
z'
>1 •?
\
y -L V I >#'-y'.
yy
vyr:
t‘/
V. ■
\ >
\
r
r
y|iK
iv \'.)\ -A
y?s^'/
ff
X 5-i-$/•'’■■'
N,V\\\
\
♦ ^• 4
V. e V \ " \ N' V V S
\i t yy/• •
L-r*
\
••: V
A \
\“'•■ Zix#XX
\
V
X-
rx^
1
/
/
y -A V
y /i .*
\
N Xy'
I \
*. .•N / X
/
$z \wV
N
N
5v
■*«.
k* ^’.W A ;/
V' V V
t_
■ >n
’V.
\Mz/f ! //
/
/
%I f
I f /
U I // /
f #
If //
/V
Ay / ' \V !
/ /
/ /
/ / /
» 0' /
< /
/
/
//
//
<>• Jt
f y I*
/
I / f '
'V. .'/ X/.'y./z
7 '/
X
N
I
A ^P s?
zA/y^X
,^zr 0^\'
'|.3V’;
1>W-AAfcfe
o r 3
® ^.SS* ^ zS.S-Ss sl« 3 “
?a>92 ft ^
\
a oI- ^ S
ZZo
ta-k "1 "t
ve S* w
y
. I '
• - '
f ^
v'f:
#'/ • *• *
A
'■J*:
‘tjvf
v:
r '^ • • • * <
e- ■ ■,■•'. V>
V , ; ' • / '
—-^iN * . *• ^
1®
•' *»-"w <?3
• #
^;-
tf
«
i m 4
'■J/
I
• W:
«.i
i*
'it "A
• <
't.
■f
#
^ *..r.
(-4-< ^rs - »^
t.,. Jamm
r
I
f
I
.Ti
.;.:1
3^'
___ .■
S>
■It.-
- ^
C«
*4 '
-Tbki)^I8i^
r* *
•
-• m
•*S^:-' :.■■: ’Sfs
I
•f k#*“ ‘ '
(r
r
5* I
GTQ O
o 3 o
•V 3
O “•a oro
o «>
¥ C- o
O ^
^ 5*
2. TO
■■■ •
3oro
•0
»
I - -
IM iilifc
m
m >•K
A
•• .1i'..ij.- r.
m
ml
•M I
-0
^ 2
o
t,
'• ►
ni»nian'
niuM ti)
il l? . I'l ri
IImiwmf
rTT ilM!
11
IXJllU
•fl 1-ill'
IIiLu;i jf
11(1
ilJ!i!r.lt ■.|,. V-
iiWiiiHiliilil
UUUllr.-^ y.
i^i
I *>« • *iItrr
•O 5T ^
^ p %
r-
tv
i
0
N
vA••
vn
vH
si %
oi
0
;d ^ ^O' J v>> ^
/
/
/
/
4 /
i
\
V
N
\
v>l
X
'i.
A ,
., A
\
* ‘a' 'V
..V
\
/
.. /
'■' ■'///.*/ ^
/
#i
tf
\
\
/
/
4
■ I M ▼
/
/
/
/
I
\
\
\
October 6,1998
MlOl^
'.. * vMr
.i-
1 _» ' +■■
j|^
>- »• ^ ^ *^r/* •
%
2
• \
■'■ ■'"Hi
»' ^-^5|-•<«r •. « ^ '
P ^
.'■'V^ -
3
4
, ■ ‘ • * r->;. ^ II wtW
*^ *• * - • T ^ •• ^ 4n^
• *
^:;. * I '% •
*
*.. * ft
_«A iilJt__ljrf^_fcliJL.___Se___5j 'u.4^'^\! *« v“% i0f^ .j>^
/
!
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’250-500*500-1000*
A. House X ss 71 90 S.F.
Playhouse
Length WidUl
X mmt 1 1 7 S.F.
X s S.F.
X 8 S.F.
B. Garage X S.F.
C. Driveway X Sfiqn S.F.
X 8 S.F.
D. Sidewalk
•
9Qn ^nnHoY-—1 f«)S.F.
to lak^^)8 IRfi S.F.
E. Patio/Deck 7.7n X - .S.F.
n A ^8 1 404 S.F.
F. Landscape
attached deck
X mtm S.F.
Underlain X zs S.F.
By Plastic X 8 S.F.
G. Other Q n R1 nr*V 8 234 S.F.
144 stoops @ front & brick wall
TOTAL HAimCOVER IN ZONE 11.606 S.F.
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE -43.400 S.F.
A B m.nnn X 100 8 26.7 %
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A. House X 6484 S.F.
Playhouse
Length Width
X 8 112 S.F.
X 8 S.F.
X 8 S.F.
B. Garage X ■ -S.F.
C. Driveway X ,440S S.F.
X 8 S.F.
D. Sidewalk lakA X 8 1 no S.F.
X 8 S.F.
E. Patio/Deck PaQ X 210 S.F.
Pprnnia q X 8 S.F.
F. Landscape - WA 1 1 Q • X 8 1 70 . R S.F.
Underlain Pi ADf-pk-r X 8 S.F.
By Plastic X 8 S.F.
G. Other Ha y.f^hn X 8 1 ^7 S.F.
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 11,603.5 S.F.
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE -S.F.
A 14x603^5 B 43,400-X 100 =-----2^^----%
\
A
B
A
B
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’75-250’250-500’500-1000’
EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A. House
Length Width
X
X
X
B. Garage
C. Driveway X
X
D. Sidewalk . )»jryp-<2-
E. Patio/Dcck x
F. Landscape _____________ x
Underlain _____________ x
By Plastic
G. Other
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
I\<rnn&D -i- B 4-‘g>4tOg> X 100
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A. House X
Length Width
X
X
X
B. Garage
C. Driveway
ir^L.Otp'E^p INI HOU'5^ -$«a.■Fcc?rA<S5»e-
X
X
D. Sidewalk c>A\ypry.c. -yr-^
I _____
X
X
E. Patio/Deck X
X
F. Landscape v\JAir^«^i
Underlain t=^i>>.MTKTg«^
By Plastic _____________
X
X
X
G. Other
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
L \r^n't^.<=r + B A"^-ACSO X 100
*S.F.
1 1 ^S.F.
s S.F.
s S.F.
•g S.F.
ss S.F.
s • •S.F.
S.F.
=S.F.
55 S.F.
=1-4/04-S.F.
S.F.
s S.F.
=S.F.
- -S.F.
1 1 S.F.
•S.F.
=:%
••
S.F.
1 S.F.
s S.F.
s S.F.
S.F.
ss S.F.
s S.F.
rs \GC?S.F.
8 S.F.
8 S.F.
8 42./.^S.F.
S.F.
8 lO^S.F.
8 S.F.
«IW S.F.
1 S.F,
m S.F.
2/;,. 7-
A
B
A
B
7^
■ I
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
SETB/ CK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75'75-250'250-500'500-1000'
EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONT*.
A. House ' *. • X
Playhouse -------- ■Width
B. Garage inc. w/house
• •
C. Driveway ________
• m
D. Sidewalk 2Mlimd£r_trelli«)
96 fwalk t.g> lake)(
E. Patio/Deck 720 fdeckl x
684 (patio & x
attached deck)
F. Landscape___________^' . . x
Underlain ___ x
By Plastic _______ x
G. Other
90(block retaining wall)
144(stoop 9 fron^
brick wall)
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPER FY AREA IN ZONE
11.606 + B 43,400 X 100
PROPOSED HARnroVKR TN ZONE
A. House _____________ X
Length Width
B. Garage inc, w/house
C. Driveway
D. Sidewalk 96.5
E. Patio/Deck 24 (pergola)
F. Landscape 30 (ret, wall) x
Underlain _____________ x
By Plastic _____________ x
3210
112
5690
1404
234
1 1 r
d-^ ^ dnn
^6.7
5922
. 30
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
4473.5 ^S.F.
___S.F.
96.5 S.F.
}
G. Other Pool & deck X
TOTr'sL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
11,605 B 43,400 X 100
1059
11.605
"5^
S.F.
•^1um%:wm*m f *
■ ■ ■>y — ~" A •'^±s^L:=:*^rsss=s.T.
w ea S!irt\i;;»is9|K!?»|!S^B!=li!'l .0<9
«izii553tt^^gCK '''■'«' "''’I "'!J!!S2
i wm% i^ ^ ■--«*——— IB
• 4<i
jr. .'.r' ■ . :•> ~~'i—.J‘.l - & -
*srT—j
HJ
1 • X^S~V
I '.
4-iita ‘j—
.. >.;
i > ♦ ^ *4 # Mr—* ■
^WlMP^PipH
<T«*‘
=^?3aB.riA' '
•.*
8. ..JXrtt 'ry,!! *trnis4^t!'!!?!
t--—-±rz.±' ■ fcT dtri
! ■ *-
•—-W1* —«-r
t .-I \cr:i
^:-"rV v-.-U'> ■■ ,i;ij^ ' - ■ t i-i,
k.l k.-J
V
tb ':y;
/
^ •—*1
3SRD»D
\ -
^ ••
\
i\ -p
&07
»>
IE
OCNCHAU NOTCS
Typ« and tizfs iliown art for easy driving at moderate rate.
Set page on car s>iei for turnir»g radi> of cars. ’*R” ■ This radius
Overall sues art shown m urms of radn for preliminary assumptions
Any decrease in radn will decrease speed of driving
PUBLIC POAO
TWO CAP WIOC POAO ONE CAP WIC / '^OAO OIAOONAL entrance
PRIVATE ENTRANCE ROADS INTERSECTING PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES
•calx : r•Ao•-o"
NO LANOINO-CROSOOVER
LAnaOiNO MAV BE MAO BV BACKINO ONLV
Construction point locations arc found by ir
ing solid arrows: dotted arrows are radii fro
points for curvei
LANOINO on bide
LATvOruo AT TmC CNO BV BACKIMO OTMLV
•CA«x: r ■ Ao*»o*
m¥-
COUNCIL f/E£Ti;;
Application Date: 8/19/98
Completion Date: 8/19/98
60 Day Deadline: 10/18/98
OCT 12-1998
cmroFORONo
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: 10/9/98
ITEM NO.:
Department Approval:
Name Paul Weinberger
Title Assistant Zoning Administrator
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: #2420 Robert C. Ryan Jr.
3535 Christine Drive
Denial Resolution
Application: The applicant had proposed to construct a 90' wind tower as an additional
source for electricity to serve 'lis property. At your last meeting on September 28,1998 you voted
5 to 0 to deny the Ryan's variance request, and directed staff to draft a denial resolution. Attached
is a copy of the denial resolution.
This application required the following variances:
1. Structure height to exceed 30'. The applicant has requested a 90' wind tower, exceeding the
allowed height by 60 feet.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
To adopt or amend the enclosed denial resolution.
1
r
A RESOLUTION DENTING A VARIANCE TO
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.28, SUBDIVISION 5 (A)
FILE #2420
WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to State Statutes 412 et. seq. and 462 et. seq., the City
Council of the City of Orono has adopted zoning regulations for the protection of the public
health, safety and general welfare; and
WHEREAS, Robert Ryan (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the property
located at 3535 Christine Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally
described as follows:
Lot 2, Block 1, Betz Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota
(hereinafter "the property"); and
WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission
held a public hearing on September 21, 1998, at which times all persons desiring to be heard
concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a variance to
Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (A) to permit the construction of a 90’
wind tower for the purposes of producing electricity; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the application, the recommendations
of the City staff and the Planning Commission, and the comments and written statements
submitted by the applicant.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono.
Minnesota hereby denies the requested variance as described above based on one or more of the
following findings of fact concerning this property:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2420.
Page 1 of 3
r
2. The property is located in the RR-IB Zoning District, where 2 acres or 87,120
s.f. is the minimum lot area. The property consists of 1.62 acres or 70,881 s.f.
3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application on September 21, 1998 and
recommended denial on a vote of 6 to 0.
4.The use is prohibited in the Zoning District. The wind tower would require a
Zoning Code Amendment to allow wind structures as an accessory use.
5.
6.
The use and structure would be inconsistent with the development of the area.
Neighboring property owners located at 3505 Christine Drive and 60 Stubbs Bay
Road are opposed to the granting of the variance.
7.The fact that the property has been subject to electrical power outages would not
constitute an undue hardship as power outages are not unique to the applicant s
property, because they affect large areas.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
denies a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (A) for constniction
of a 90’ wind tower to be located on the property.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this 12th day of October,
1998.
ATTEST;
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
Page 2 of 3
m
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of
October, 1998 by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono,
a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
Notary Ihiblic
4
Page 3 of 3
r
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Department Approval: Administrator Approval:
Name: Michael P. Gafiron ,
Title: Senior Planning Coordinator
C JU.NGIL r/E£TI!\!Q
OCT 1 2 1998
CiTYCFGRONO
Date: October 9,1998
Item No,7
Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: Dan Regan, 3410 North Shore Drive - Request to Allow Driveway Access to
Outlot A'Tonkawa Shores" - Appeal of Administrative Action
Lbt of Exhibits
A - Notice Mailed to Neighboring Property Owners
B - Sketch
C - Agreement Proposed by Render & Regan
D - Sketch of Revised Proposed Road
E - Memo and Exhibits of September 25, 1998
Dan Regan of 3410 North Shore Drive appeared before Council on September 28 requesting
approval to construct a primary driveway access from his proposed attached garage to the 16' private
road approved for Jim Render’s 3-lot "Tonkawa Shores" subuivision. This would result in a 4th user
of that road, and staff denied this access on the basis that Render's road had been allowed at a
substandard width since it would only serve 3 users, and that Regan already had access onto North
Shore Drive.
Council suggested that Regan and Render devise a proposal for increasing the width of Render’s road
to accomodate a 4th user, recognizing that the road plan as approved appears to limit Regan's (and
his neighbors') ability to continue their occasional use of the old 16' easement.
Staff met with Regan, Render and Regan's builder (Sawhorse Builders) on October 2, and it appears
a reasonable solution is being proposed:
1. Render will widen the road to 20'.
2. Regan will pay the added cost to widen it from 16' to 20'.
3. Regan will pay 1/4 of the ongoing cost to maintain the road.
4. If additional users (3400 and 3420 North Shore are the primary candidates) are
permitted to access the road in the future, Regan would be proportionately reimbursed
by them for his initial costs, and they would then share in the maintenance.
This proposal requires the Tity to agree to a number of things:
1.That a 20’ road, rather than the 24’ required by code, is acceptable tStaff recommendation:
20' is a good compromise, in that it provides added area for parking and passing for this very
r
3.
4.
34 1 0 North Shore Drive - Access Issue
October 9, 1998
Page 2
short (250’) section of private road, while remaining at a relatively narrow width that is less
likely to draw unwanted traffic, and that is still relatively unobtrusive for the neighborhood.)
2. That a reorientation of the 'hammerhead' turnaround as proposed is acceptable (Staff
rSCQnUTlffldfltion* The 'T* hammerhead as revised should provide similar access for
emergency vehicles as the original proposal, as long as it meets curve radius standards.)
That it is reasonable for Regan to have his primary access to Tonkawa Road rather than
North Shore Drive (Staff recomm endation: Since North Shore Drive has significantly more
traffic, changing Regan's primary access to Tonkawa should be a positive step from a safety
standpoint. Staff would then recommend that Regan's North Shore Drive access be
removed).
That a 20' private road as proposed with a hammerhead turnaround could reasonably serve
as many as 6 potential primary users (Staff recommendation: We are pushing the limit for
needing a cul-de-sac, but it is true that 4 of the 6 lots which ultimately would use the private
road also abut a County road, hence firefighting equipment would likely set up in the County
road. This unique configuration differentiates this proposal from many others we may be
faced with.)
This week the owner of 3400 North Shore stopped in to see if he could get a building permit for a
detached garage accessing to Render's road. He was advised to attend Monday's meeting.
Staff Recommendation
The proposed paved width increase from 16 ’ to 20’, with the revised T tumaio’inJ, is a reasonable
compromise that in this specific case should provide adequate access for up to 6 homes while having
minimal impact on the neighborhood. If approved. Render may wish to amend his subdivision
covenants to incorporate or reference the proposed agreemen;. As an aside, note that as a result of
the private road outlot creation, 3400/3410/3420 North Shore Drive have become 'through lots'
which require a CUP for any detached accessory buildings.
Staff recommends approval of the proposal subject to:
1 . Paved width of private road shall be increased to 20'.
2. Render to provide a revised road plan detailing 20' width and revisedT turnaround.
3. Regan shall eliminate the driveway access to North Shore Drive upon opening of the
access to Render's private road.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Motion to allow Dan Regan of 3410 North Shore Drive to create a driveway access to Render’s
private road in Outlot A, Tonkawa Shores per conditions 1-3 above.
A
CITY OF ORONO
2750 KeUcy Parkway, P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Phone (612)473-7357 Fax 473-0510
NOTICE
The City Council at its regular meeting on Monday, October 12,1998 in the Council Chambers at
2780 Kelley Parkway will consider the request by Dan Regan of 3410 North Shore Drive that he be
allowed to construct a driveway accessing Tonkawa Road via the private road to be constructed in
Outlot A, Tonkawa Shores. Tonkawa Shores is the 3-lot subdivision approved for James Render on
the former Putnam property at 1365 Tonkawa Road.
The addition of this driveway access potentially will require a change in the nature (width, length,
layout) of the 16’ private road that was approved for Tonkawa Shores. The City Council has directed
that neighboring property owners be advised of this meeting and allowed to comment on the
proposal.
The meeting begins at 7:00 p.m. All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this time. Written
comments are solicited. A sketch of the proposed driveway access is attached to this notice.
City of Orono
By: City Council
3S
1
II -------! ■ 1II
» - JJl ^
>i_ __6125332668 SAWHORSE DESIGrJEPS F-226 T-S63 P-002
,w/L
OCT 07 ’93 16:43
C
/O-f'fS
Since 1977 &^SIGNERS & BUILDERS Mn. 2382
October 5,1998
Given that Renders’ finr' road design makes it difficult for Regan (and/'or other neighbors who abut the old
16 ’ easement) to access Tonkawa without trespassing on Renders’ road. Render agrees to grant the existing
easement beneficiaries die liglit to use his road as they have in the past.
In consideration for Render granting such access to Regan (a 4 ’’’ user), Regan agrce.s to bear the cost of
widening Renders road from 16 ’ to 20’. Regan also agrees to bear a proportionate cost of maintaining die
20’ road equal to the cost of maintaining the road divided equally by the number of properties using the
road (4 users, V* of the cost).
It is agreed that any additional users permitted access to Renders road in addition to Regan, reimburbC
Regan for a portion of hU costs incurred in widening the road from 16 ’ to 20’. The reimbursement is to be
calculated by dividing the cost of widening the road plu-s interest of 10% per annum by the number of
additional users including Regan (1* additional user after Regan, '/z of the cost plus interest, addiuonal
user 1/3 of the cost plus intere.st).
Additional users shall also share equally in the costs of maintaining the road.
Pan Regan Date
Jim Render Date
4740 42 “’' Avenue North
Robbinsdalc, MN 55422
612-533-0352 Fax 533-2668
www.6awhorseu8a.com
St Paul
651-439-3343
239 East Lake Street
Wa>"zata,MN 55391
612-475-4477 Fax 475-4474
>:43 LAKE MINNETONKANORTH ARMWot«r •tavotion on 1/23/98 wo* 928.22 ft, NCVO-1929
V«^t known wotor •Uvoti^ of L*«
ftT NGVO—1929, occordkig to th« MN. Dopt of Notvra K*»oir
B«Khm<rk is o eWsrtsd -X" at NW cor^ of pumphouM ot Croy* *
Boy Dam; sisvotion is 932.87 ft, NGVD—1929
•Sfi-ferCH £>P
s»o*;sift*'*
r
y w-.....’/K
99
^08-
oV.
s
o
w*
( \
o
/
v_./
^ “95.00 o
.......H VA
»?;♦? _ - i Jj ••
'^Vf'<3if?aae,
w easement
[*•.-
' S^3?58'00" E
*•.
••TT
w'/ /
OU -A* r
•V N 57«02'00" E 294.43
o
I74
•••..y\
8 I
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
/
/
/
1
1 r
1 ^
Date: September 25,1998
Item No.: /5^
Department Approval: Administrator Approval:
Name: Michael P. Gaffron '■^|> <_)
Title: Senior Planning Coordinator
Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: Dan Regan, 3410 North Shore Drive - Access Issue -
Appeal of Administrative Decision to Deny a Second Curb Cut
List of Exhibits
A - Regan Proposed Site Plan
B - Plat Map w/Topography
C - Render Survey: Existing Putnam Driveway
D - Render Private Road Design
E - 1963 Sewer As-Built Map
F - 1955 16' Easement Documentation
Summary of Issue
StafThas denied an access to Outlot A, Tonkawa Shores (Jim Render's subdivision) for a new garage
proposed by Dan Regan of 3410 North Shore Drive, on the basis that 1) Regan already has access
to North Shore Drive; and 2) Render's private road will be substandard and was intended as a
driveway to serve only his 3 proposed homes. A number of additional factors identified below make
this a somewhat complex issue.
Background
Mr. Regan has applied for a building permit to make improvements to his property, including
window replacement, construction of a deck addition, and construction of an attached 2-stall garage.
The proposed work meets all setback and hardcover requirements, and staff is prepared to issue a
building permit.
However, we delayed issuance of that permit based on Mr. Regan's proposal to construct a second
driveway access. Regan already has a driveway accessing North Shore Drive, but has no garage
served by that driveway. He does have an old detached garage (to be removed) at the north end of
the property, which does not have an improved driveway. Regan's access to this old garage has been
via Render's (formerly Putnam's) existing driveway.
• 5
♦ Wf
Regan Access Issue
September 25, 1998
Page 2
During the review of Render's subdivision staff was unaware that Regan's old garage was being
accessed via Render's driveway; it was not obvious to staff that this use even existed. However,
Regan indicates it is accessed regularly and often from Render's driveway, Regan currently cannot
use the North Shore Drive driveway to access the back of his property because of a deck existing in
the 15' space between his house and the e.ist lot Hue.
A new driveway proposed to serve Regan's propi>..r.d attached garage would access to the 16'
"easement for roadway purposes" centered on the common lot line between the Regan and Render
properties. Public Services Director Greg Gappa and I concluded that Regan's proposed new
driveway would functionally be a second curb cut, which requires City approval. Greg and I also
concluded that the curb cut should be denied because it would make use of Render's private
driveway which was approved by Council at a substandard paved width of 16' on the basis that it
would serve just 3 homes. Adding Regan's new use as the primary access for a 4th home suggests
the potential need to make Render’s driveway more substantial than 16'. It is also apparent now that
the property owner west of Regan has historically had a secondary driveway access from this old
easement.
Render was unaware that Regan intended to make this change in use, and it appears that Rende-’^'s
road is designed such that Regan would have to travel outside the old 16' easement, trespassing on
Render's property, to make use of Render's new road.
A few additional points:
• Regan feels he has a right to access to Tonkawa via the 16' easement, and that Render should
not be allowed to build a road that would deprive Regan of this access.
• Render was apparently not anticipating Regan being a 4th primary user of Render's new
private road; this begs the question of who should bear the costs of upgrading it to a standard
acceptable to the City for 4 (or more?) units.
• Staff is concerned that the Council approved Render's road at 16' without knowing that there
would be a 4th user (or more users if additional neighbors make use of the easement). If
Council had had this knowledge, the approval might well have had different conditions, such
as a wider road, or making it a public road, or requiring the cul-de-sac, Oi?
It is unfortunate that these issues were not uncovered during the subdivision review process. TTie
extent of the neighbcrhood's historic use of the 16' easement was not at all obvious to staff or to
Render, and the survey work as well as City topo maps used during the review did not suggest such
use. Staff had no information suggesting that Putnam had maintained the driveway for use by his
neighbors. The area in front of Regan's garage is maintained as grass lawn, and the driveway leading
to his westerly neighbor is overgrown.
Regan Access Issue
September 25, 1998
Page 3
Issues to be Resolved
1. Should Regan be allowed to have his primary access to Tonkawa Road, via Render’s private
road?
2. If so, should Regan's North Shore Drive access be removed?
3. If Regan's primary access will be to Render's private road, should that road be constructed
wider than the 16' width approved with the subdivision?
Staff Recommendation
1. Giver that Render's final road design makes it difficult for Regan (or other neighbors who
abut the old 16’ easement) to access Tonkawa without trespassing on Render's private road,
Render should grant the existing easement beneficiaries the right to use his road as they have
in, -thg-pasT
2. Regan should be allowed to access Tonkawa via Render's road, subject to:
Si Render's road being widened to accomodate this 4th user: and
hi Regan's North Shore Drive access being discontinued.
3. The City's paved width standard for a private road serving 3-6 units is 24'. Render's road was
approved at 16' in order to minimize impacts of the road on the neighborhood, as well as to
limit its potential use by Maxwell Bay Access users. Widening the road to 20' could likely
be accomplished within Render's platied outlot, would have little added impact on the
neighborhood, could still be perceived by the public as a private driveway, and would
provide added width to better serve a 4th or 5th user. Staff recommends that the road be
widened to 20'.
Other Options?
Assuming Regan has a right to access Tonkawa via the old 16' easement. Render should either accept
Regan's trespass outside the old 16' easement, or re-design his toad further south so Regan can use
it without trespassing. Or, Render could move his road north, leaving enough room within the old
16' easement so that Regan and other users can create their own new driveway parallel to Render's.
Optionally, the City could exercise its underlying road easement, making this a City road. None of
these alternatives are likely to be acceptable to all parties.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Give staff and the property owners direction as to whether the staff recommended solution to this
problem is acceptable to Council.
6125332668 SAWHORSE DESIGNERS F-622 T-5S0 P-002 SEP 14 '93 10:20
K)a.
z
73
2r27
5‘
SL
i
ID
-1^
f j eo
C^.
to
Wl
t
0
\j%
K>
1
On
R
^-r1
-o%y
/'
N,
\
I0.96.sc S
69xez M nOO .96.ZC N
dio»QVOd VMV>!NOi (S£L ’ON Qd ‘OO)
0
\
. r
V-V
5I ?l
I
10
Oi
Sk 5 »
It
>
^ ^1?
?a fa «
|5 I
U ^r?II, iS
i {5
I ^
zzm
■* i
go
>
T
s
S8T6L 3-«00',8So2£ S'
_czr “rrrrr=:— --------------------------------------
p>f
5i!
I
4
rr-rr-rtar?
BM
.? 4li
o
y
•••.
■••4
ti59*?9?:~ r_'z«r: iHDii ."ss-oje -n -----
(avoy VMvxNOi)
31
U T0g$tk«rmUh mit M« fcarWHamtiifa mmd ^|ilr£$!&c««
Miif* kttomglmg ft l« amifitlm ap/mrUlmimf, H IA« mid gaiUm mf IA« mmmd pmH, iMr madgma, tha awr*
rfiw •/ mW fartUa, mmd Ika hatra mmd madgma mf tka amrmimat, faawr, tha mM gmrllea af thr at^'md pdH
tmktmg ua Jatml tammmta mmd mat aa Itmmmla to aamMati.
dmdthamid U4xy«y. .K«lix .antL rx«AjeM..M«xla ri«iir« liic viX«« mad
i:xobotlu.«Bd £tfn* Kxoboth, .his..vi£«« .......
ef ikf ftdi fmrirn /lur thAXa0«lv«o# . t koix Mr$, #4rriiiff«rt •inil tit*
iwwami triih ike mthi ikg metmd parim iheirmmlim$a ik§surHivt0/mht nmti ike krim
itmtl mMrigma mf ike MHeriror, ikmi .. th«y. % f • . ir^l sHeid im fm%t Infijb nni! prefnlmre 99/neemtht nri«/
kn^9 gong rlgki in e»ft nmd eommip ike §nm§ /n mnmner nmd form n/nrem$ht, ikni ike ^me nr»*
fi^ee fmtai nii igkemmikr meeef
wMi jnet to taitoo and •poei«il nioossnnnts^ if any« viiieli «ir«* !•••'•« ^
i!!ny*bo koronftor laviod or assosscd o^ainst a*«id prnni::t*L*, ***. •
nvt y^t ^!\ic .Hid i^-nyohlom . . _
•fit#/ ikn nftnre knrfniniett uaU gntniegi litfah na#l pretnUena in ike 9§uM amt /i»vias*.f/#/»- pn*a%d,\ng of !hv
enlg 'pi^eiied mf ike eergmd paria iheir arndgnoa ike earHrue mf mtig pnriie*. amt ikr krir.4 anoi $tf tka*
«*iiWrtir, ttgaimei ail, pt^rnage hnrfuth* elalming or iaelaim ike irkige nr amp tmri tkirenfa ntgkjerl
Jmeamhram*r0a if anp, krr^umkrftar** titenlitofeit, Ike ea§i§l part io8«#/ ike firet p§rt 9ri*t \Varr*99gt nrtt
Mend. • • .
®rtllllHlliy tB^CrCifa Tke 4»tht f$ari laa*^ aiftLe prrJ ptft ktt y«i «•/ , . ,i
kai99»i n ike dap 99999} pe$9r ftra yflwnv gerttta 99,
t9paf*ree€mro of
\)
/
V a adi,^C I //. )}^Ad /
I^tote o( minnerota,
Vammtp mf
I
• • • • • *;
• • • al t •
n*-! ’• 1 . /;# /aa/Mli
, withiH a99»t far t*ni9otp, /«•» •••» #/.*/! 9fao
a 1 •I.**
On tk94 «, L;* flay n/*
I.:.. 41 . * lie
• .xvii*. anu 1' '^co;: Kjtrio
aa S a***! 1* • » 4^0 L 14^ »• i «a m • • *4 ^
in 999e kmoicn in he ike prrmm e deMeriled in. #i#mI w A # rxteateat tka »i ••»#•# •#••
nod aek99narMgfd tkagi tirr y r,raa*tateti tk • aa*‘
free 9get a%nd 9ta-ett
• a. •• • • • •mwJip/rti.
a a*, , . * « . • . • It
,W.#rV 1*99 tat ia*.: V.!*#••#• •»». .!/.#»»
.If// et$999 9999d%h999 e,Tp»ee4 •
I
Mm»% iiitt«iii#flt4 -«#f X-4t- *ff f*.f ttit •Mu I»»t wMrwmtM it U xh*n«#% w l•r^.
€
. iS
L M M 1' f • M 1
1 * ^
[ t
^ -.1
#
' t •
r.. V i\ ^
1
1 ' • •
;
‘ ’ * i•
♦ >
i W,M,
'11*4 for raegrd on tho 3 »tc.y of May \.0« lV5:i at 9«30 o'clo^V *
a
/V
f
I i
m2041 mi378
ssssaMsnKifFatal No» 5-M
29392^!*^
Snbtnturr> jf«i.«Mt -»m. 4.,^ -.r*”!*?! --.i
hfttreen
r. r*»roth, 1.1c wif««
vf th* CottHttf 0/ . . .and IttaU 0f . Kirt'or.o.t*'^ V^’i***'
of ih0 jtnd pn’rt, and i{d7’avx..(i.*La. .l^•uuc.U7. .AOd..iittX(.'AX.*.t .«!.•. kota^ody.# hUSbAWl..
A R^^*' f 0 0 • • • **4«* •M******* • • • • .• ■•« » ••••*'••••• ••••t* •• ••••• ■•••#■ t 0^ t^0 0^
laonncpin An4 5fiif«a/. .«^KlAa«oo ta , pattha •/ tremmd part.
WtlumUl. That th0 taid p$tH tha flnt tuH* tn eanditroHa^ af tha 9am af On«
I a J Z AX and ..«t ii« r. ..aooxi *C * •B(tbb4lt^,
ta ttiCa tm hand paid hjfth0 mtid imHIu 0f th0 $pmn4 jmHt tk0 rteeifd tehartof t$ k0f^ 00k’m0$et-
^fed, do hrrthp flntmt, Harfalm, lt$U, omd Coottp umlo fl mid poHtto of the aeeomd port oo joimt
teoaote nod oof ae tennote Im eomoiom*tketo oedfne, the eurvtt^ of told pmHtoe, omd the hetee mod
oodgn.* of the eun-tror. Forever, aU ihe^tmet... or.pareet -.. of land lyfng «a4 hrtmg ip the Fountg of
............Uoitiiapin ond Stoio of Minm^o, deeerthed ae fottom, ioaottt
n'.l ti.ut |*»irt of Lctc I’ourteon (l4) and Flfteor. (15)« Lyul«rd*c Pari*,
Jijij*jtcv.ir •! ••Mi'.neaotf*, closeribart aa followat Bo^ir.ninQ at a p-oinc
<r r.« it.-utlwcat line of saiu Let 15, 255 foot MorthwoatorJy oX the
’.lint ol Ixiterrection of tba Juuthweat line of said Lot 15 and the vase
i:r.o »’;'i».'r. on ciio plat of said Lytiiard^o Park; thence hortkeaot at rlQht
ar.^jor with tie Jouthwest line of said Lot 15, 125 feet; thence Horth»
i>arallel wxtii the Southwest line of said Lot 15, to ths shore of
Liiko IlinnetonVa; thence Southwesterly along said shore to the Southwess
line ii said Lot 15; then'ce Southeast to the point of boginAing*
to ar.M ineluiUng an eanceent, which easeaent is described as
foMows: i. strip of land 16 feet wide across Lets 13, 14, and 15,
l.y«:iaid*Q Porf, lionnepin County, Kinnesota, the centerline of v>? ich is
dencribot! an follows: Heginning at a point oh the Southwest line o.
a., id Lot IS, 225 feet Northwest of the point of intersection qf the
woathwest lire of Lot 15 and tho base line shown on the plat of caic
Lytiiard'r l-arh; thence Northeast at right an.jlos with’the Southwest line
nv said l.ot 15, to the Ilortheaut lino of saiu Lot 13 and there
ter'r.i**ot ing« . ^ • #
r- iH ea»e;.te*nt shall bo for roadway pjiposes, both of ingress and egress
over. t..e sa:r.e an-J shall run with the land and be binding upor tho l.elrr,
executors, adcinistrators and assigns of the parties ef the first part
hereto, and upon the parties of tl^p second part, the. surwlvor. thereof
and* the heirr and -0.08 igns of the survivor* • .. . ^
..ceofdinri to the nop or plat thereof on ftle and el recerd in the office
o.‘ the Register ef Deeds, in and fer dennepint County, Minnesete*
m>reoFM»it«»w».couiiTYyMn«»«i
^3
COUNCIL r
i REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
OCT 1 2 199
CITY cr ORONO
Date: October 8,1998
Item No• •
Department Approval: Administrator Approval:
Name: Michael P. Gaffron
Title: Senior Planning Coordinator
Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: Revised Version - Plumbing In Accessory Buildings Ordinance - Adoption
List of Exhibits
A - Revised Ordinance for Adoption
B - Memo & Selected Exhibits of September 24,1998
C - Draft Covenant for Limited Wastewater Plumbing
On September 28 Council tabled discussion of the 'Plumbing in Accessory Buildings' ordinance after
directing staff to consider a number of revisions. The primary revisions discussed were:
1.Limit applicability of the ordinance (or at least the toilet/tub/shower CUP provisions)
to properties of 2 acres in area or larger, regardless of the zoning district;
2. Limit applicability to structures that are conforming in location.
Exhibit A is a revised ordinance draft that incorporates the above revisions. The wording and order
of sentences has been slightly revised to be more 'user friendly'.
Staff was concerned that a provision strictly limiting applicability to only those properties 2.0 acres
or larger, would be in conflict with the City's ordinance that allows Council to grsuit a guest house
CUP for a property that meets the 'double the zoning district minimum lot area' requirement. For
instance, a 1-acre lot in a 1/2-acre zone might otherwise qualify for a guest house CUP under the
Guest House ordinance, and therefore should not be prohibited under the Plumbing In Accessory
Buildings ordinance. The language has been drafted to address this.
Guest House CUP vs. Plumbing in Accessory Buildings CUP
The proposed ordinance is intended to provide an alternative to the Guest House CUP for the
property owner who has no intent to use the accessory building as a guest house. The Guest House
CUP was/is intended for an accessory building that is set up as a freestanding dwelling, containing
all the amenities necessary to live there without having to 'go up to the main house' for anything.
Plumbing in Accessory Buildings
October 8,1998
Page 2
There is always a potential that an accessory building with a toilet/bathtub/shower that is intended
for something other than dwelling use, will occasionally be used as a? added bedroom for short term
stays, say when relatives come to stay for a few days or a week. But if a relative stays there all
summer, that building has become a guest house.
The zoning code does not differentiate between "occasional overnight use" and "gaest house use".
If an accessory building has all the basic amenities to be used as a dwelling ("provisions for sleeping,
eating, cooking and sanitation" according to the Building Code) at what level of use does it actually
become a dwelling? Absent some clear distinction, we expect there will be a few cases where
someone crosses over the line.
One possible way to create a distinction would be to prohibit overnight stays entirely unless a Guest
House CUP is obtained. Council may wish to consider whether such a limitation should be added
to this ordinance.
Revised Draft Ordinance Outline
Following is an outline of the key points of the redrafted ordinance:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Water supply plumbing is allowed in any accessory building that is conforming in location,
size and height, regardless of lot size, via staff issued permit without Council approval.
Wastewater plumbing (except for toilet or shower or bathtub or a combination of same) is
allowed in any accessory building that is conforming in location, height and size, regardless
of lot size, via staff issued permit without Council approval, subject to covenants which
prohibit home occupation use, secondary dwelling use except by guest house CUP, or rental
dwelling use.
Wastewater plumbing when such includes a toilet shower, bathtub or a combination of same,
shall be allowed only via a "Plumbing in Accessory Building CUP" when such accessory
structure is on a lot that is 2.0 acres or larger in area and is not intended to be used as a guest
house; or via a valid "Guest House CUP" that has been approved by the City Council.
A "Plumbing in Accessory ’ Building CUP" may be approved by Council only when Council
finds:
- the use of the structure is appropriate in the neighborhood;
- the plumbing fixtures proposed are appropriate for the intended use;
the lot area is at least 2.0 acres;
the accessory building is in a conforming location as to setbacks; and
- the property owner agrees to filing of a covenant with restrictions as described
in #2 above.
Plumbing in Accessory Buildings
Octobers, 1998
Page 3
Staff Reconiniendation
Staff recommends adoption of the redrafted ordinance. Exhibit A.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Adopt the ordinance as redrafted or direct staff to make appropriai? revisions.
ORDINANCE NUMBER , SECOND SERIES
an ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL ZONING
BY ADDING SECTION 10.03 SUED. 9F AND SECTION 10.20 SUBD. 3Q
regulating plumbing in ACCESSORY BUILDINGS
The City Council of the City of Orono ordains;
Section 1. Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03 Subd. 9 is hereby amended by adding Subd.
9(F) as follows:
Subd. 9. Accessory Buildings.
F. Plumbing. Because the provision of plumbing fixtures and wastewater plumbmg
in accessory buildings has the potential to allow such buildings to be used as dwelling umt^
and because it is the policy of the City to limit residential development density to the ahW
densities within the respective zoning districts, plumbing in accessory buildings shall be
regulated as follows:
1 . The provision of outside sillcocks and indoor water supply shall be
allowed in any accessory building that is conforming in location, size and height.
2. Installation of any combination of fixtures requi^g wastewater
plumbing that does not include a toilet, shower or bathtub shall be allowed in any accessory
Lilding that is confomiing in location, size and height with, subject to ®
municipal sanitary sewer or a conforming sewage treatment system designed to handle the
anticipated Hows from such fixtures, and subject to the property owner executmg a covenant
providing that:
a. Accessory building will not be used for a home occupation
unless specifically approved by City or if allowed by City code.
b. Accessor>' building will not be used as a dwelling unless a
guest house CUP is obtained.
c. Accessory building will not be rented, leased or othe-wise
provided for use as a dwelling under any circumstances.
Page 1 of3
i '
3. Installation of any combination of fixtures requiring wastewater
plumbing that includes a toilet, shower or bathtub shall be allowed only in an accessory
building that is conforming in location, siz and height, which meets one of the following
criteria:
a. The accessory building has been approved for a 'Guest House'
conditional use permit; or
b. The accessory building has been approved for a 'Plumbing in
Accessory Building' conditional use permit.
Section 2. Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.20, Subd. 3 is hereby amended by adding Subd.
3(Q) as follows:
Subd. 3. Conditional Uses.
Q. Plumbing in Accessory Building. The provision of a toilet, bathtub or shower
in an accessory building. Approval shall be conditioned on provision of municipal sanitary
sewer or a conforming sewage treatment system designed to handle the anticipated flows
from the building plumbing. Approval shall be granted only when the following criteria are
met:
1 . The Council finds that the proposed use of the accessory structure with
plumbing will not be detrimental to the residential character of the neighborhood;
2. The Council finds that the plumbing fixtures proposed are in keeping
with the intended use of the accessory building.
3. The property is 2.0 acres in area or Icirger.
4. The accessory building is conforming in location, size and height.
5. The property owner agrees to the filing of a covenant in the title of the
property providing that:
a. the accessory building will not be used for a home occupation
unless specifically approved by City or if allowed by City code.
b. the accessory building will not be used as a dwelling unless
a guest house CUP is obtained.
c. the accessory building will not be rented, leased or otherwise
provided for use as a dwelling under any circumstances.
Page 2 of3
J
r
Section 3. Adoption and Publication. This ordinance shall become effective upon adoption and
publication.
Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota on this 12th day of October, 1998
by a vote of___^ayes and___nays.
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
Page 3 of 3
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
10-^
Date: September 24,1998
Item No.:
Department Approval:Administrator Approval:
Name: Michael P. Gaffroii
Title: Senior Planning Coordinator
Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: Proposed Zoning Code Amendment - Plumbing In Accessory Structa^es
Ordinance Adoption
List of Exhibits
A - Proposed Ordinance
B - Ordinance Draft Showing Revision History
C - Staff Memo and Ordinance Draft - September 18,1998
D - Staff Memo & Exhibits of July 16,1998
E - Planning Commision Minutes July 20,1998
Background
Please review the memo and exhibits of July 16.199i
Summary of Code Amendment
The proposed language for Section 10.03 Subd. 9F will generally regulate plumbing in accessory
buildings as follows:
1. Allows issuance of permits for outside sillcocks and indoor water supply in all
accessory buildings.
2. Allows issuance of permits for installation of fixtures requiring wastewater
plumbing (other than toilet, bathtub or shower) subject to:
a. Suitable septic system or sewer connection; and
b. Owne: must execute a covenant whereby owner agrees to:
- No home occupation use unless approved or allowed by code.
- No dwelling use except/unless via a guest house CUP
- No rental/lease as a dwelling unit
3. Installation of a toilet, shower or bathtub will be allowed only via a "guest house
CUP" or a "plumbing in accessory buildings CUP" for those uses which Council finds
will not be detrimental to to the residential character of the neighborhood and are in
keeping with the intended use of the accessory building.
The proposed language for Section 10.20 Subd. 3Q creates a new conditional use in residential
zones to be known as "Plumbing in Accessory Buildings" for those situations where a toilet, bathtub
or shower will be installed, subject to the same conditions noted in 2a and 2b above.
Plumbing In Accessory Structures
September 24,1998
Page 2
Planning Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this proposed amendment on July 20, 1998
pursuant to published and posted public notice. The July 20 review resulted in a continuation to a
work session held August 14, 1998. The August 14 review resulted in direction to staff to make
specific changes to wording. The final Planning Commission review was held on September 21,
1998, which resulted in a 6-0 vote to recommmend approval of the proposed ordinance with certain
additional language * cvisions which have been incorporated into Ejdiibit A. The history of Planning
Commission revisic*. to the original draft ordinance is illustrated in Exhibit B.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends adoption of the attached ordinance per the Planning Commission
recommendation.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Adopt or amend the attached ordinance.
r
PROPOSED CODE LANGUAGE ADDITIONS
(REVISED 9-17-98per PC Comments at 8-14-98 Work Session)
(REVISED 9-24-98 ptr PC Cemmcnis ot 9-21-98 Rtffulor MctllAg)
Section 10.03
Subd. 9. Accessory Buildings.
F. Plumbing. The provision of outside sillcocks and indoor water supply shall be allowed in all
accessory buildings. Because the provision of plumbing fixtures and wastewater plumbing in
accessory buildings has the potential to allow such buildings to be used as dwelling units, and
because it is the policy of the City to limit residential development density to the allowed densities
within the respective zoning districts, plumbing in accessory buildings shall be regulated as follows:
Provision of anv combination of fixtures requiring wastewater plumbing that does
not include a telUt. shower or bathtub shall be considered as an allowed accessory
use in anv accessory building subject to provision of municipal sanitary sewer or a
conforming sewage treatment system designed to handle the anticipated flows from
such fixtures, and subject to the property owner executing a covenant providing that:
Accessory building will not be used for a home occupation unless
specifically approved bv City or {f allowed bv City code.
Accessory building will not be used as a dwelling unless a guest house
CUP is obtained.
Accessory building will not be rented, leased or otherwise provided
for use as a dwelling under anv circumstances.
Provision of anv combinations of fixtures requiring wastewater plumbing that does
include a tolUt. shower or bathtub shall be allowed only via a "guest house" or
"plumbing in accessory building” conditional use permit as regulated in the zoning
code, and subject to provision of municipal sanitary sewer or a conforming septic
system designed to handle the anticipated flows from such fixtures.
Section 10.20
Subd. 3. Conditional Uses.
O. Plumbing in Accessory Building. The provision of a toilet, bathtub or shower in an accessory
building. Approval shall be conditioned on provision of municipal sanitary sewer or a conforming
sewage treatment system designed to handle the anticipated flows from the building plumbing.
Apofovnl ahall be pronted owlv for thoie mei which Connell fln4a will wot bt
detfimentot lo Ihe fasidenUol chofocter ef the wl^hbofhood owd which Council Hnd»
Of In Ictepino with Iht Intended me ef the occesaofv building. Appfovol will bn subject
to the property owner executing a covenant providing that:
St Accessory building will not be used for a home occupation unless
specifically approved bv City or if allowed bv City code.
Accessory building will not be used as a dwelling unless a guest house
CUP is obtained.
£* Accessoiv building will not be rented, leased or otherwise provided
for use as a dwelling under anv circumstances.
c
/o-S'9^
CITY OF ORONO COVENANT FOR
LIMITED WASTEWATER PLUMBING IN AN ACCESSORY BUILDING
THIS COVENANT, made and entered into this _____ day of
________19___by______________________________(single/husband and
wife/a Minnesota corporation), (hereinafter referred to as "Applicants") and the City of Orono,
a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "City").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Applicants have made application to the City for the installation
of limited wastewater plumbing in an accessory building on property in Hennepin County, State
of Minnesota, legally described as:
) 1
(hereinafter referred to as "Subject Property"); and
WHEREAS, 'limited wastewater plumbing’ for purposes of this Covenant shall
include all interior wastewater piping and fixtures except for toilets, bathtubs and showers; and
WHEREAS, City staff have reviewed Applicants' application and have found that
the building proposed for the installation of limited wastewater plumbing has met the standards
established within Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (F) of the Orono Municipal Code to allow
installation of limited wastewater plumbing; and
WHEREAS, Applicants are aware that according to Section 10.03, Subdivision
9 (F)(2), specific conditions exist under which limited wastewater plumbing may be allowed
within an accessory building; and
WHEREAS, Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (F)(2) allows issuance of a permit for
installation of limited wastewater plumbing in an accessory building conditioned upon the
execution of this Covenant and its filing in Applicant ’s chain of title; and
WHEREAS, in order to identify all parties within an interest in the subject
property, the Applicants are required to provide title information to City staff as requested. All
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES TO THIS COVENANT AGREE TO THE
FOLLOWING:
1.
2.
3.
4.
4.
Applicants' request for installation of limited wastewater plumbing within the accessory
builditig (—d^Sgrib? it—) on the Subject Property is approved conditioned upon the
execution of this Covenant by the City and the Applicants.
The following conditions shall control the installation and use of the limited wastewater
plumbing:
A) The accessory building shall not be used for a home occupation unless
specifically approved by the City or if allowed by City code.
The accessory building will not be used as a dwelling unless a Guest House
conditional use permit is obtained from the City.
The accessory building will not be rented, leased or otherwise provided for use
as a dwelling under any circumstances.
No toilet, bathtub or shower shall be installed within the accessory building unless the
property owner obtains a Guest House Conditional Use Permit or a Plumbing In
Accessory Building Conditional Use Permit from the City, and installation of one or
more of said tixtures without the required Conditional Use Permit shall constitute a
violation of this covenant.
This Covenant shall be binding upon current and future owners of Subject Property, and
shall be filed within the chain of title of the Subject Property.
Fw owner(s) of the Subject Property, if not the Applicants, consent to the execution of
this Covenant and to its terms, as shown by his/her/their signature(s) upon this
document.
Page 2 of 4
Application Date: 0/18/98
Completion Date: 6/18/98
60 Day Deadline: 10/15/98
COUNGiL
OCT 1 2- i998
CI7YCFORO^iO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: 10/9/98
ITEM NO.: ^
Department Approval:
Name Paul Weinberger
Title Assistant Zoning Administrator
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description:#2389 Daniel Kluth
2801 Fox Street
Conditional Use Permit
Application: The City Council voted to table this application at the September 28, 1998
meeting. Mr. Kluth originally applied for a Guest House Conditional Use Permit to allow one toilet
and one sink in an accessory structure on the property.
City Staff has presented a proposed Zoning Code Amendment that would allow the applicant to
apply for a Plumbing in Accessorj' Building Conditional Use Permit". The intent of the CUP would
allow accessory buildings not intended to le used as dwelling units to have an approval process that
would allow plumbing to exist.
The following criteria must be met to grant approval for a "Plum! in Accessory Structure
V irtV.'ltlonal II«f» Pprmit"
1.
2.
The Council finds the proposed use of the accessory structure with plumbing will not be
detrimental to the residential character of the neighborhood.
The Council finds that the plumbing fixtures proposed are in keeping with the intended use
of the accessory building.
The property is 2.0 acres in area or larger.
The accessory building is conforming in location, size and height.
T^e property owner agrees to the filing of a covenant in the title of the property providing
a. the accessory building will not be used for a home occupation unless specifically
approved by the City or if allowed by City Code.
the accessory building will not be used as a dwelling unless a guest house CUP is
obtained.
the accessory building will not be rented, leased or otherwise provided for use as a
dwelling under any circumstances.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Subject to Council approval of a Zoning Code Amendment to allow plumbing in an accessory
building as a Conditional Use Permit.
To adopt or amend the enclosed resolution to allow plumbing in an accessory building as a CUP.
Resolution
Declaration of Covenant
Site Plan/Survey
Staff Memo from Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.20, SUBDIVISION 3 (Q)
FILE NO. 2389
WHEREAS, Daniel J. Kluth (hereinafter the "applicant") is the owner of the
property located at 2801 Fox Street within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally
described as follows:
Lot 1, Block 3, Farview, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property");
and
WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono to permit
a "Plumbing in Accessory Structure - Conditional Use Permit" to allow a toilet and sink to be
installed into an accessory structure.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1.
2.
3.
4.
This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2389.
The property is located in the LR-IA Zoning District.
The property is approximately 2.71 acres in area.
The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on September 21,
1998, and recommended approval of a conditional use permit for plumbing in
an accessory structure to allow for a toilet and sink based on the following
findings:
a. The proposed use of the accessory structure with plumbing will not be
detrimental to the residential character of the neighborhood.
Page lof 4
,-iW ....J
r
b. The plumbing fixtures proposed are in keeping with the intended use of
the accessory structure.
c. The property location, size, and height meet minimum requirements to
allow a conditional use permit to be granted.
4.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments
by the applicant and the effect of the proposed conditional use permit on the
health, safety and welfare of the community.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants a conditional use permit to allow "Plumbing in an . 'essory structure to include a toilet
and a sink and subject to following condition;
1.’fhe property owner agrees to the filing of a covenant in the title of the property
providing the following:
a.The accessory building will not be used for a home occupation unless
specifically approved by the City or if allowed by City Code.
b. The accessory building will not be used as a dwelling unless a guest
house conditional use permit is obtained.
c.The accessory building will not be rented, leased or otherwise provided
for use as a dwelling under any circumstances
2.Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the owner
but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a land
alteration permit within one year of the date of Council approval or the special
conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (October 12, 1999).
Page 2of 4
4.
Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this
resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically
teiminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a
misdemeanor.
The iindersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms
of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns,
hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the
property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 12th day of October, 1998.
ATTEST;
Linda S. Vee, City Cleric Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
Property Owner(s)
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
ss.
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of
October, 1998, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono,
a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
V.
Notary Public
Page 3of 4
1
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this day of 199 _before me a Notary Public widiin
and for said county, personally appeared
known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within
and for said county, personally appeared
known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed.
Notary Public
Page 4of 4
CITY OF ORONO COVENANT FOR
LIMITED WASTEWATER PLUMBING IN AN ACCESSORY BUILDING
THIS COVENANT, made and entered into this 12th day of October, 1998, by
Daniel J. Kluth and Donna Kluth (husband and wife), (hereinafter referred to as "Applicants")
and the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as the
"City").
!
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Applicants have made application to the City for the installation
of limiteci wastewater plumbing in an accessory building on property in Hennepin County, State
of Minnesota, legally described as:
I ot 1, Block 3, Farview, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as
"Subject Property"); and
WHEREAS, 'wastewater plumbing' for purposes of this Covenant shall include
all interior wastewater piping and fixtures except for bathtubs and showers; and
WHEREAS, City staff have reviewed Applicants' application and have found that
the building proposed for the installation of limited wastewater plumbing has met the standards
established within Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (F) of the Orono Municipal Code to allow
installation of wastewater plumbing; and
WHEREAS, Applicants are aware that according to Section 10.03, Subdivision
9 (F)(3)(B), specific conditions exist under which limited wastewater plumbing may be allowed
within an accessory building; and
WHEREAS, Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (F)(3)(B) allows issuance of a permit
for installation of limited wastewater plumbing in an accessory building conditioned upon the
execution of this Covenant and its filing in Applicant's chain of title; and
WHEREAS, in order to identify all parties within an interest in the subject
property, the Applicants are required to provide title information to City staff as requested. All
parties with an interest in this property shall sign this covenant.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES TO THIS COVENANT AGREE TO THE
FOLLOWING:
1. Applicants request for installation of limited wastewater plumbing within the accessory
building to include fixtures to allow a toilet and sink on. the Subject Property is
Page 1 of 4
1 1
2.
3.
approved conditioned upon the execution of this Covenant by the City and the
Applicants.
The following conditions shall control the installation and use of the limited wastewater
plumbing:
The accessory building shall not be used for a home occupation unless
specifically approved by the City or if allowed by City code.
The accessory building will not be used as a dwelling unless a Guest House
conditional use permit is obtained from the City.
C) The accessory building will not be rented, leased or otherwise provided for
as a dwelling under any circumstances.
use
No bathtub or shower shall be installed within the accessory building unless the
property owner obtains a Guest House Conditional Use Permit or a Plumbing In
Accessory Building Conditional Use Permit from the City, and installation of one or
more of said fixtures without the required Conditional Use Permit shall constitute a
violation of this covenant.
4.
4.
This Covenant shall be binding upon current and future owners of Subject Property, and
shall be filed within the chain of title of the Subject Property.
Fee owner(s) of the Subject Propert>', if not the Applicants, consent to the execution of
this Covenant and to its terms, as shown by his/her/their signature(s) upon this
document.
Page 2 of 4
TO:
DATE:
Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator
FROM: Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager
July 29, 1998
SUBJECT: Septic Review for Application #2389, Daniel J. Kluth - Conditional Use Permit
This memo is a review of the septic system capacity at 2801 Fox St. due the applicant's proposed
accessory structure.
The City and State regulations determine the septic system sizing for residential uses based solely on
the number of bedrooms. Additional bathroom or plumbing fixtures do not require additional septic
tank or drainfield capacity unless the fixtures can be expected to cause unusually high flows. The
existing on-site system serving the residence is designed for a four bedroom dwelling. As long as the
residence still has only four bedrooms, no alteration of the septic system is required at this time.
CObN'JlL _REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Date:
Item No,
OCT 1 2 i998
Oc(663tl8ri998NO
Department Approval: Administrator Approval:
Name: Michael P. Gaffron'"^^^^^
Title: Senior Planning Coordinator
Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item DescriptioD: Zoning Code Amendment - Interim Use Ordinance - Second Review
List of Exhibits:
A - Revised Ordinance for Discussion/Adoption
B - Council Minutes of August 24,1998
C - Memo & Exhibits of August 19, 1998
This item was tabled for further review by staff after minimal discussion on August 24. It was noted
that the ordinance language does not strictly follow the language in the statutes, and that the criteria
for interim uses should be spelled out.
In order that discussions on this proposed amendment continue, staff is suggesting revisions to the
criteria establishing applicability of the ordinance (Subd. 4, page 2):
Subd. 4. Interim Uses: Limitation on Applicability. This ordinance shall apply only
to properties that:
a.abut existing U.S. Highway 12 that contain an existing building in which the
interim use will occur.: or and
b. cither will abut future Highway 12 or in which the existing building will be
partially or fully acquired for future Highway 12 right-of wav: and
for which the Council determines that no other use would be financially
isasiblfi^
These revisions restrict the applicability of the ordinance to a relatively small number of properties
that will be acquired by MNDot for Highway 12. The scope of the resulting ordinance is extremely
limited, but still gives Council wide latitude in determining suitable short-term options for the few
sites to which the ordinance applies.
The "Purpose" statement has been redrafted and shortened to more directly pertain to the reasons for
this ordinance in the context of Highway 12.
Interim Use Ordinance
October 8,1998
Page 2
The "General Standards" section (Subd. 3) has been reworded to match the format of the statute
language. Item F regarding 'no adverse effects on the public health, safety and welfare’ is not in the
statute but staff feels it is appropriate language to add here
As noted previously, staff is hesitant to create a list of allowable in'iOrim uses; however, additional
general performance standards could be added under Subd. 3 (General Standards) if Council so
chooses, to minimize or eliminate specific unwanted types of activity. This would give staff and
property owners a better sense of the nature of interim uses Council may or may not approve.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Review the revised applicability criteria, and direct staff how to proceed regarding the Interim Use
ordinance.
ORDINANCE NUMBER , SECOND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF ORONO
BY DEFINING AND AND PROVIDING FOR
INTERIM AND TEMPORARY USES OF LAND
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORONO ORDAINS:
Section 1. The municipal code of Orono is hereby amended by adding the following Definition
to Zoning Code Section 10.02:
"Use, Interim" - A temporary use of property until a particular date, or until the occurrence
of a particular event, or until zoning regulations no longer permit it, as determined by the
City Council.
Section 2.
follows.
The municipal code of Orono is hereby amended by adding Section 10.14 to read as
SEC. 10.14. INTERIM USES.
Subd. 1 . Interim Uses: Purpose. Certain properties within the City are
subject to future acquisition for right-of-way of Highway 12, and those properties
may in some cases be unsuitably situated or not financially feasible on a short-term basis for
any of the permitted or conditional uses allowed by the Zoning Chapter. However, certain
uses under certain conditions may be appropriate for such properties for a limited period of
time, but which a’*** i.c * generally appropriate on a permanent basis, which are not consistent
with land uses designuted on the adopted Land Use Plan, and which are not identified as
allowable permitted or conditional uses within the respective zoning. .trict. The purpose
of this ordinance is to allow' such uses for a brief and limited period of time at the discretion
of the City Council. In order to achieve these purposes, the City Council is empowered to
grant and to deny applications for interim use permits and to impose reasonable conditions
upon the granting of these permits.
Subd. 2. Interim Uses: Procedure. Applications for interim use permits shall
be processed in tl:e same manner as conditional use permits as established in Section 10.09
of the Zoning Chapter.
the following:
Subd. 3. Interim Use.®;: General Standards. An interim use shall comply with
A. The use shall conform to the standards tc> a conditional use permit as set forth
in Section 10.09 of tht: Zoning Chapte:.
B. The use shall contorm to the applicable general peribrmance standards
established in Section 10.60 of the Zoning Chapter.
I
C. The date or event that will terminate the use can be identified with
certainty.
D. Permission of the use will not impose additional costs on the public if it
is necessary for the public to take the property in the future.
E. The user agrees to any conditions that the City Council deems appropriate for
permission of the use.
F.Permission of the use will not result in adverse effects on the public health,
safety and welfare.
Subd. 4. Interim Uses: Limitation on Applicability. This ordinance shall
apply only to properties that meet all of the following criteria:
A. The property contains an existing building in which the interim use will occur;
and
B. The existing building and the property will be acquired for future Highway
12right-ofw. -and
C. The Council determines that no other use for the property would be financially
feasible.
Subd. 5. Interim Uses: Termination. An interim use shall terminate on the
happening of any of the following events, whichever occurs first:
A. The date stated in the permit.
B. Upon violation of the conditions under which the permit was issued.
C. The redevelopment of the use and property upon which it is located to a
pemutted or conditional use as allowed within the respective zoning district.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication
according to law.
Adopted by the City Council of Orono on this
and__nays.
ATTEST:
day of _, 1998, by a vote of__ayes
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
/
/ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR AUGUST 24,1998
(#2402 Glenn Sauer, Continued)
Goetten moved, Flint seconded, to approve Application #2402,4104 HIghwood Road, per
Resolution #4147. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(#9) #2404 OTTEN BROTHERS NURSERY, 2350 WAYZATA BOULEVARD - COMMERCIAL SITE
PLAN REVIEW
The Applicants were not present
Mayor Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to table Application #2404. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Mayor Jabbour stated the adjoining property owners will be notified of the new hearing date.
Van Zomeren requested a 60 day extension be granted since the Applicants were not present, noting
the time l.'tnitwili expire September 19th.
Tom Barrett, City A^orney, stated the City could request an additional 60 days since the Applicant
was not present
(•#10) #2407; ANE AND KELLY MOORE, 3438 LIVINGSTON AVENUE - VARIANCES -
RESOLUTION NO. 4148
Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Application #2407,3438 Livingston Avenue,
per Resolution #4148. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
(*#11) #2409 GEDNEY AND EMILY TUTTLE, 1225 SHORELINE DRIVE - VARIANCE -
RESOLUTION NO. 4149
Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Application #2409,1225 Shoreline Drive,
per Resolution #4149. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
(*#12) INTERIM USE ORDINANCE • ADOPTION
Kelley moved, Goetten s^i* winded, to table Item #12. NO VOTE TAKEN.
Goetten withdrew her second.
Flint stated he has concerns with the language contained the document, noting the ordinance does
not conform with the language in the statute, and requested further review by City Staff. Flint
commented the criteria for interim use should be spelled out
Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to table Item #12. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(•#13) SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB - REQUEST FOR HOLDING TANK
Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the use of a holding tank for the rest station for
Spring Hill Golf Club per Code Section 12.30 Subd. 4E. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the relocation of the rest area to a site located
approximately 180' north of County Road 6 as shown on the site plan attached to the Request
for Council Action dated August 19,1998. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(Recess taken f***' 18:58 p.m. - 9:07 p.m.).
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Date:
Item No.
August 19, 1998
Department Approval: Administrator Approval:
Name: Michael P. Gaffron
Title: Senior Planning Coordinator
Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: Zoning Code Amendment - Interim Use Ordinance - Adoption
List of Exhibits:
A - Ordinance
B - Memo & Exhibits of August 14,1998
4\
Background
In April 1998 Cliff Otten, owner of the Day Care building at the intersection of Hwy. 12 and Co. Rd.
6, requested that the Council consider how that building might be used for the next 3-5 years before
it is demolished to make way for highway construction. That site is zoned RR-IB residential, and
the building is not likely to ^ used for any of the permitted or conditional uses allowed in RR-IB.
Council asked staff to consider how we might accomodate short term uses of this building.
Staff suggested that the City adopt an Interim Use ordinance which would allow Council to approve
on a limited-term basis, a use which is otherwise prohibited in a given zoning district. Such use
would be subject to any conditions the Council chooses to impose. Interim Use permits would be
processed in the same manner as CUP's.
Staff reviewed Interim Use ordinances in effect in Plymouth and Roseville. Those two cities differ
somewhat in their approaches. Plymouth ’s ordinance suggests that a !i«;t of acceptable interim uses
mi^t be defined for each zoning district; Roseville's ordinance does not suggest the need for such
a list, and gives the Council broad discretion to approve or deny interim uses.
Statutory Authorization
Cities are authorized to adopt Interim Uses ordinances by State Statutes 462.3597, which define
Interim Use as "a temporary use of a property until a particular date, until the occurrence of a
particular event, or until zoning regulations no longer permit it".
The Statute states that the Council may grant permssion for an interim use if:
1 . the use conforms to the zoning regulations;
2. the date or event that will terminate the use can be identified w ith certainty;
[•jiXinfw
[tlrtlTlKl
lUtJkWt
11 Mirti tmri¥si
rt¥iTiifsi
[iJCi]
DimfRi
^iiii I :^CTntir^iTiRCTr
RT¥fiT*iTiMi^
[•nirtsiiT^
[•■riTv^
MctlliHl
WaOTHil LiJiKfiC^I
•RITiTtffi
I •!•] ■ f) ^ii txim ii ^ii
r«iiirti
[tivfiirti
lircire
•III! lit
[tiiirfiisaintTiraiTii
LtifirtrodiMt
Interim Use Zoning Amendment
August 19, 1998
Page 3
Staff Recommendation
Staff agrees with Planning Commission that creating a list of allowable Interim Uses may create
more potential problems than it solves. Council must use an Interim Use ordinance judiciously in
order to avoid claims of spot zoning, and to ensure that neighborhoods will not be negatively
impacted.
Staff recommends adoption of the Interim Use ordinance without a list of allowed uses, and with the
limitation to the Highway 12 corridor ai-eas as defined above. Council may wish to consider whether
any additional language is needed to more closely define under what specific situations such w
ordinance might be used.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Adopt or amend the attached Interim Use ordinance.
ORDINANCE NUMBER , SECOND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF ORONO
BY DEFINING AND AND PROVIDING FOR
INTERIM AND TEMPORARY USES OF LAND
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORONO ORDAINS:
Section 1. The municipal code of Orono is hereby amended by adding the following Definition
to Zoning Code Section 10.02:
♦
"Use, Interim" - A temporary use of property until a particular date, or until the occurrence
of a particular event, or until zoning regulations no longer permit it, as determined by the
City Council.
Section 2. The municipal code of Orono is hereby amended by adding Section 10.14 to read as
follows:
SEC. 10.14. INTERIM USES.
Subd. 1. Interim Uses: Purpose. In order to achieve the goals and objectives
of the Zoning Chapter, in certain districts, specified conditional uses are allowed subject to
the granting of a conditional use permit. From time to time, circumstances may arise wherein
a certain ase under certain conditions may be appropriate within a specific district or on a
specific property for a limited period of time, but which is not generally appropriate on a
permanent basis, which might not be consistent with land uses designated on the adopted
Land Use Plan, and which is not identified as an allowable conditional use within the
respective zoning district. Such use might also fail to meet all of the zoning standards
established for the district within which it is located. The purpose of this ordinance is to
allow a use for a brief and limited period of time until a permanent location is obtained or
while the permanent location is under construction; or to allow a use that is currently
judged acceptable by the City Council, but which will not be acceptable in the future due to
anticipated development or redevelopment; or to allow a use which is consistent with the
intended long range use of an area and which is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan.
In order to achieve these purposes, the City Council is empowered to grant and to deny
applications for interim use permits and to impose reasonable conditions upon the granting
of these permits.
Subd. 2. Interim Uses: Procedure. Applications for interim use permits shall
be processed in the same manner as conditional use permits as established in Section 10.09
of the Zoning Chapter.
Subd. 3. Interim Uses: General Standards. An iiuerim use shall comply with
the following:
A. The use shall meet the standards of a conditional use permit as set forth in
Section 10.09 of the Zoning Chapter.
The use shall conform to the applicable general performance standards
established in Section 10.60 of the Zoning Chapter.
The date, event or occurrence that will terminate tlie use can be identified with
certainty.
The use will not impose unreasonable costs on the public, and will not result
in adverse effects on the public health, safety and welfare.
The user agrees to any conditions that the City Council deems appropriate for
permission of the use.
B.
C.
D.
E.
Subd. 4. Interim Uses: Limitation on Applicability. This ordinance shall
apply only to properties that:
a. abut existing U.S. Highway 12; or
b. either will abut future Highway 12 or will be partially or fully acquired
for future Highway 12 right-of way.
Subd. 5. Interim Uses: Termination. An interim use shall terminate on the
happening of any of the following events, whichever occurs first:
A. The date stated in the permit.
B. Upon violation of the conditions under which the permit was issued.
C. The redevelopment of the use and property upon which it is located to a
permitted or conditional use as allowed within the respective zoning district.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication
according to law.
Adopted by the City Council of Orono on this
and__nays.
day of ., 1998, by a voyo of__ayes
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
Chair Smith and Planning Commission Members
Mike Gaffron, Senior Planning Coordinator
iqJi>
August 14, 1998
Subject: Proposed "Interim Use" Ordinance
List of Exhibits
A - Revised version of proposed ordinance
B - Memo and Exhibits of August 4, 1998
At your August 14 work session, the Planning Commission members present voted unanimously to
omit the requirement that the City create a list of allowed Interim Uses. You indicated you would
prefer to follow the Roseville model and leave it entirely to the Council's discretion as to whether
a proposed use is acceptable on an interim basis. While this provides only minimal direction to the
property owner or potential users, it gives the Council an unlimited set of options.
In reviewing this ordinance Nvith City Attorney Tom Barrett, he has indicated that while a list of
allowed interim uses apparently is not strictly required. Planning Commission and Council should
give some thought to potentially opening a pandora's box of non-residential uses in our primarily
residential zones. The legal issue is not so much that of a neighbor's right to protection via zoning
limitations, but that if all relevant factors are the identical, a neighboring property would have to be
allowed the same interim use. I think his bottom line is that there is some merit in having a list,
because it would protect the Council from having to respond to an unlimited range of potentially
unfriendly uses.
The ordinance has been redrafted to omit the requirement for a list. A public hearing has been
scheduled for Monday's meeting and must be opened for public comment. After the hearing.
Planning Commission should take a final vote of recommendation to the Council.
Staff Recommendation
Approval of the attached Interim Use ordinance, specifying whether language requiring a list of
acceptable interim uses should be required.
>]f^
r yr •u .0
» >4
ORDINANCE NUMBER , SECOND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF ORONO
BY DEFINING AND AND PROVIDING FOR
INTERIM AND TEMPORARY USES OF LAND
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORONO ORDAINS;
Section 1. The municipal code of Orono is hereby amended by adding the following Definition
to Zoning Code Section 10.02:
"Use, Interim" - A temporary use of property until a particular date, or until the occurrence
of a particular event, or until zoning regulations no longer permit it, as determined by the
City Council.
Section 2. The municipal code of Orono is hereby amended by adding Section 10.14 to read as
follows:
SEC. 10.14. INTERIM USES.
Subd. 1. Interim Uses: Purpose. In order to achieve the goals and objectives
of the Zoning Chapter, in certain districts, specified conditional uses are allowed subject to
the granting of a conditional use permit. From time to time, circumstances may arise wherein
a certain use under certain conditions may be appropriate within a specific district or on a
specific property for a limited pieriod of time, but which is not generally appropriate on a
permanent basis, which might not be consistent with land uses designated on the adopted
Land Use Plan, and which is not identified as an allowable conditional use within the
respective zoning district. Such use might also fail to meet all of the zoning standards
established for the district within which it is located. The purpose of this ordinance is to
allow a use for a brief and limited period of time until a permanent location is obtained or
while the permanent location is under construction; or to allow a use that is currently
judged acceptable by the City Council, but which will not be acceptable in the future due to
anticipated development or redevelopment; or to allow a use which is consistent with the
intended long range use of an area and which is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan.
In order to achieve these purposes, the City Council is empowered to grant and to deny
applications for interim use permits and to impose reasonable conditions upon the granting
of these pemiits.
Subd. 2. Interim Uses: Procedure. Applications for interim use permits shall
be processed in the same manner as conditional use permits as established in Section 10.09
of the Zoning Chapter.
Subd. 3. Iiiierim Uses: General Standards. An interim use shall comply with
the following:
A. The use shall meet the standards of a conditional use permit as set forth in
Section 10.09 of the Zoning Chapter.
B. The use shall conform to the applicable general performance standards
established in Section 10,60 of the Zoning Chapter.
C. The date, event or occurrence that will terminate the use can be identified with
certainty.
D. The use will not impose unreasonable costs on the public, and will not result
in adverse effects on the public health, safety and welfare.
E. The user agrees to any conditions that the City Council deems appropriate for
permission of the use.
Subd. 4. Interim Uses: 1 ermination. An interim use shall terminate on the
happening of any of the following events, whichever occurs first:
A. The date stated in the permit.
B. Upon violation of the conditions under which the permit was issued.
C. The redevelopment of the use and property upon which it is located to a
permitted or conditional use as allowed within the respective zoning district.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication
according to law.
Adopted by the City Council of Orono on this___day of
and __nays.
,, 1998, by a vote of__ayes
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
&
To;
From:
Date:
Chair Smith and Planning Commission Members
Mike Gaffron, Senior Planning Coordinator
August 4, 1998
Subject: Proposed "Interim Use" Ordinaiice
List of Exhibits
A - Draft 0; Jinance
B - City of Plymouth Ordinance
C - City of Roseville Ordinance
D - Minnesota Statutes 462.3597
Attached is a draft "Interim Use Ordinance" which would allow the Council to grant an Interim Use
Permit for uses which do not appear as permitted/accessory/conditional uses in the zoning code, but
which the Council might find acceptable for a limited period. This will have applicability to a
number of properties in the City, such as the Cliff Otten former daycare site at the intersection of
County Rd. 6 and Highway 12, and perhaps for the industrial park or other areas which might be
affected by zoning or Comprehensive Plan changes, or the Hwy 12 relocation.
This was drafted using language from the Plymouth ordinance and the Roseville ordinance, both of
which are attached. Plymouth ’s is more detailed, and has one elemert which differs significantly
from that of Roseville. It suggests that an "allowed interim uses" list be added to each zoning district
(See Plymouth 21020.03 Subd. 3). This would on the one hand provide a definite limit on the range
of interim uses available, and provide property owners clear direction as to what might be feasible;
but on the other hand would require a zoning code amendment each time a suitable but unlisted
interim use was proposed, and would therefore limit the City's flexibility for approving interim uses
in a timely manner.
The wording of the Statutes is somewhat ambiguous as to whether a list is required, merely stating
that permission for an interim use ni3y be granted if "the use conforms to the zoning regulations".
The Statutes and the proposed ordinance give the City Council total authority to approve or deny
interim uses ..s it sees fit. The City Attorney has been asked to review the draft.
Staff Recommendation
This item wnll be the subject of a public hearing at your August 17 meeting. At the work session on
August 7 Planni*- Commission should consider whethe * Orono's ordinance should include a list of
allowed interim uses , or leave it open ended to give Council broad discretion in approving interim
uses.
~l:>^2vpf
ORDINANCE NUMBER , SECOND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF ORONO
BY DEFINING AND AND PROVIDING FOR
INTERIM AND TEMPORARY USES OF LAND
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORONO ORDAINS:
Section 1. The municipal code of Orono is hereby amended by adding the following Definition
to Zoning Code Section 10.02:
"Use, Interim" - A temporary use of propert> until a particular date, or until the occurrence
of a particular event, or until zoning regulation.; no longer permit it, as determined by the
City Council.
Section 2.
follows:
The municipal code of Orono is hereby amended by adding Section 10.14 to read as
SEC. 10.14. INTERIM USES.
Subd. 1. Interim Uses: Purpose. In order to achieve the goals and objectives
of the /.oning Chapter, in certain districts, specified conditional uses are allowed subject to
the granting of a conditional use permit. From time to time, circumstances may arise wherein
certain uses under certain conditions may be appropriate within a specific district or on a
specific property for a limited period of time, but which are not generally appropriate on a
permanent basis, and which might not be consistent with land uses designated on the adopted
Land Use Plan, and which are not identified as permitted, accessory or conditional uses
within the respective zoning district. Such use might also fail to meet all of the zoning
standards established for the district within which it is located. The purpose of this
ordinance is to allow a use for a brief period of time until a permanent location is obtained
or while the permanent location is under construction; or to allow a use that is currently
judged acceptable by the City Council, but which will not be acceptable in the future due to
anticipated development or redevelopment; or to allow a use which is consistent with the
intended long range use of an area and which is in compliance with tlte Comprehensive Plan.
In order to achieve these purposes, the City Council is empowered to grant and to deny
applications for interim use pemuts and to impose reasonable conditions upon the granting
of these permits.
Subd. 2. Interim Uses: Procedure. Applications for interim use permits shall
be processed in the same manner as conditional use permits as established in Section 10.09
of the Zoning Chapter.
r
Subd. 3. Interim Uses: General Standards. An interim use shall comply with
the following:
A. Shall meet the standards of a conditional use permit as set forth in Section
10.09 of the Zoning Chapter.
B. Shall conform to the applicable general performance standards established in
Section 10.60 of the Zoning Chapter.
—G:-----TheHseis allowed as an interim use in the respective zoning district {NOTE:
JHIS^UGGESTS^HAT tV zoning DlSTRIGTrAMENDMENT-IO-
. ADD-A-SPECIFIED INTERIM-USE-IS -REQUIRED FOR-EACH
APPLICATION; PERHAPS THIS SECTION CAN BE OMITTED)
D. TTie date, event or occurrence that will terminate the use can be identified with
certainty.
E. The use will not impose unreasonable costs on the public, and will not result
in adverse effects on the public health, safety and welfare.
F. The user agrees to any conditions that the Citj' Council deems appropriate for
pennission of the use.
Subd.^. Interim Uses: Termination. An interim use shall terminate on the
happening of any of the following events, whichever occurs first:
A. The date stated in the permit.
B. Upon violation of the conditions under which the permit was issued.
^C,----^Upon^angHri thFCity ’sZoning regulations which renders the use non-
conforming (SEE NOTE t\BOVE)7" *
D. The redevelopment of the use and property upon which it is located to a
pennitted or conditional use as allowed within the respective zoning district.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication
according to law.
Adopted by the City Council of Orono on this___day of , 1998, by a vote of__ayes
and nays.
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
- V
I >
li/-^ -
i'
r
k
PLYMOUTH ZONING ORDINANCE
SFCTION 21020 - INTERIM USES
21020.01. PURPOSE AND INTENT: The purpose and intent of allowing interim uses
js:
Subd. 1. To allow a use for a brief period of time until a permanent location is
obtained or while the permanent location is under construction.
Subd. 2. To allow a use that is presently judged acceptable by the City Council,
but that with anticipated development or redevelopment, will not be acceptable in the future or
will be replaced in the future by a permitted or conditional use allowed within the respective
district.
Subd. 3. To allov/ a use which is reflective of anticipated long range change to an
area and which is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan provided that said use maintains
harmony and compatibility with surrounding uses and is in keeping with the architectural
character and design standards of existing uses and development.
21020.02. PROCEDURE: Uses defined as interim uses which do not presently exist
within a respective zoning district shall be processed according to the standards and procedures
for a conditional use permit as established by Section 21015 of this Chapter.
21020.03. GENERAL STANDARDS: An interim use shall comply with the following:
Subd. 1. Meet the standards of a conditional use permit set forth in Section
21015.02, Subd. 5 of this Chapter.
Subd. 2. Conform to the applicable general performance standards of Section
21015.04 of this Chapter.
Subd. 3. The use is allowed as an inierim use in the respective zoning district.
Subd. 4. The date or event that will terminate the use can be identified with
certainty.
Subd. 5. The use will not impose additional unreasonable costs on the public,
Subd. 6. The user agrees to any conditions that the City Council deems
appropriate for permission of the use.
21020-1
PLYMOUTH ZONING ORDINANCE
21020.04. TERMINATION: An]interim use shall terminate on the happening of any of
the following events, whichever occurs first:
Subd. 1. The date stated in the permit.
Subd. 2. Upon violation of conditions under which the permit was issued.
Subd. 3. Upon change in the City’s zoning regulations which renders the use non-
conforming.
Subd. 4. The redevelopment of the use and property upon whicii it is located to a
permitted or conditional use as allowed within the respective zoning district.
21020.05. CERTIFICATION OF TAXES PAID: Prior to approving an application for
an interim use permit, the applicant shall provide certification to the City that there are no
delinquent property taxes, special assessments, interest, or City utility fees due upon the parcel
of land to which the interim use permit application relates.
=!
.X-
'S
i
•m
• 4 w
21020-2
r
04 07-99 15:39 ®612 337 5601 DSU, I NX.12 om-nil 2
M
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
•AH ORDIHAt^CE HO, 1066
f AY ■■ y
4'73-051^
-fkii
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE OP THE CITY OP
BOSEVlIiLE BY DEFINING AND PROVIDING FOR INTERIM AND TEMPORARY
OSES OF UVND BY ADDING SECTIONS 13.400, 13.410 and 13.420.
Irtie City Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota,
does liereby ordain:
I,
Section 5.494 of the City Code of the City of Roseville
is hereby anoaded by adding the following:
Use, Interim
Definition. An "interim use" is a temporary use of
property until a particular date, or until the
occurrence of a particular event, as determined by the
City Council.
II-
The City Code of the city of Roseville is amended by
adding Sections 13.400, 13.410 and 13.420 to read as follows:
* •
13.400. Use, Interim.
The City Council may authorize an interim use of
property. Interim uses might not be consistent with
the land uses designated on the adopted Land Use Plan.
They night also fail to meet all of the zoning
standards established fer the district within which it
is located.
13.410. Conditions for Interim Uses.
' The City Council may attach conditions to Interim
Use Permits. In reviewing Interim Use Permit
applications, the City will establish a specific date,
or event that will terminate the use on the property.
The Council will also determine that the approval of
r
04/07-'98 15:38 0612 33" 5601 DSU. INC 0OO2-OO2
#■ •
the interim use would not result in adverse effects on
the public health, safety, and welfare and that it will
not impose additional costs on the public if it is
necessary for the public to take the property in the
future.
13,420 Application for Interim
Applications for interim uses shall be processed in
the same manner as Special Use Permits, as established
in Section 12,030.
THIS ORDINANCE shall take effect and be in force from
and after its passage and publication.
PASSED by the City Council,o£ the City of Roseville
this 14th day of January , 1991-,
ATTEST;
r
*s.
• purposes
ivened to
rdship Or
denied
-ating the
ceded for
just their
hich will
‘oughfare
c policies
ommend
ty or any
iopt and
■sc of the
ten days
Jufficicni
ound. In
or to the
quisition
or. After
ing ordi-
462.351
uance of
section,
opened,
ity, it is
without
;d street
ig street
:ial map
r public
lality to
erected
e board
e owner
e board
roperty
cannot
hat bal-
tap and
)erty in
!rmit is
hearing
official
ippeals
r board
ecision
id if no
; build-
il ordi-
details
HOUSING, REDEVELOPMENT, PLANNING, ZONING 46236
462.3595 CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS.
Subdivision 1. Authority. The governing body may by ordinance designate certain
types of developments, including planned unit developments, and certain land devel
opment activities as conditional uses under zoning regulations. Conditional uses may
be approved by the governing body or other designated authority by a showing by the
applicant that the standards and criteria stated in the ordinance will be satisfied. The
standards and criteria shall include both general requirements for all conditional uses,
and insofar as practicable, requirements specific to each designated conditional use.
Subd. 2. Public hearings. Public hearings on the granting of conditional use per
mits shall be held in the manner provided in section 462.357, subdivision 3.
Subd. 3. Duration. A conditional use permit shall remain in effect as long as the
conditions agreed upon are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the
municipality from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of condi
tional uses.
Subd. 4. Filing of permit. A certified copy of any conditional use permit shall be
filed with the county recorder or registrar of titles of the county or counties in which
the municipality is located for record. The conditional use permit shall include the legal
description of the property included.
462.3597 INTERIM USES.
Subdivision 1. Definition. An “interim use” is a temporary use of property until
a particular date, until the occurrence of a particular event, or until zoning regulations
no longer permit it.
Subd. 2. Authority. Zoning regulations may permit the governing body to allow
interim uses. The regulations may set conditions on interim uses. The governing body
may grant permission for an interim use of property if:
(1) the use conforms to the zoning regulations;
(2) the date or event that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty;
(3) permission of the use will not impose additional costs on the public if it is nec-
cssai-y for the public to take the property in the future; and
(4) the user agrees to any conditions that the governing body deems appropriate
for permission of the use.
Any interim use may be terminated by a change in zoning regulations.
Subd. 3. Public hearings. Public hearings on the granting of interim use permits
shall be held in the manner provided in section 462.357, subdivision 3.
History: 1989 c 200 s 2
462.36 CERTIFIED COPIES FILED WITH COUNTY RECORDER.
Subdivision 1. Required documents. A certified copy of every ordinance, resolution,
map, or regulation adopted under the provisions of sections 462.358, 462.359, and
462.3595 shall be filed with the county recorder of the county or counties in which the
municipality adopting it is located. A certified copy of every variance to abstract or reg
istered property granted under section 462.358 shall be filed with the county recorder
or the registrar of titles of the county or counties in which the municipality granting
it is located; except that the requirement to file a variance is satisfied if a certified copy
of the resolution citing the existence of the variance is filed identifying the location
where the variance documents are available for inspection. Ordinances, resolutions,
maps, regulations or variances filed pursuant to this subdivision do not constitute
encumbrances on real property. The order issued by the governing body or board of
appeals and adjustments as the case may be, shall include the legal description of the
property involved. Failure to file an ordinance, resolution, map, regulation, variance,
or order shall not affect its validity or enforceability.
Subd. 2. Filing with contiguous planning authorities. A copy of a comprehensive
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
October 8,1998
OCT 1 2 1998
CITYCrOROMO
SUBJECT: Update Regarding Long Lake Fire Department 1999 Operating Budget and 5 Year
Capital Expenditures
The Long Lake Fire Commission met on Wednesday, September 23, 1998 to review the 1999
Budget and to provide an update regarding planning for a new fire station and fire vehicle
replacement. The following is a summary of the meeting, and of how future planned expenditures
for facilities and vehicles affects Orono.
1.Review of the 1999 Fire Department budget.
A. The operating budget expenditures are proposed to increase by 4%.
B. Based on the cost allocation formula, Orono's cost will increase 6% for 1999.
1) The number of calls (hours) are up significantly for Orono in relation to the
other cities.
2) The market value is up significantly for Orono vs. the other cities.
3) The combination of increased relative hours and increased relative market
value have caused Orono's total share of the budget to increase from 69.75%
to 71.05%.
New facility.
A. To enable the Highway 12 upgrade project to begin as scheduled, the Long Lake Fire
Department facility needs to be replaced by late 2001 or early 2002. The Long Lake
Fire Department staff have been involved in an effort to identify future needs related
to equipment, vehicles, and the new fire station. These plans will affect the design
and cost of the replacement fire station. The Fire Department's efforts thus far are
moving toward a facility significantly larger than the current facility. This is due to
the need to meet current code requirements for a new building, providing space for
activities the current facility does not accommodate, and providing space for planned
additional vehicles.
B.Although the City of Long Lake indicated they would try to cover any new facility
costs not covered by Mn/DOT, the potential magnitude of costs could involve Orono
paying a substantial amount toward a new facility.
3. Equipment replacement/acquisition schedule.
A.In 1993, the City began to set aside funds for future Long Lake fire vehicle
replacement. The City initially placed $30,000 into a fire vehicle replacement
account. In the following years, the City funded this account in the amount of
$20,000 per year. The funding level was based on replacement of a fire engine at a
cost of $250,000 in 1999 (Orono ’s share - $175,000).
Summary of Long Lake Fire Commission Meeting of Wednesday, September 23, 1998
October 8, 1998
Page 2 __________________________________________________
;ar
; to
B. In 1997, the Long Lake Fire Department determined an immediate need for a new
light rescue vehicle and the replacement of a utility truck at a cost of $100,000
(Orono's share - $70,000). When these purchases were authorized by the City of
Long Lake, Orono advised Long Lake that the expenditures were not built into the
City's fire vehicle funding plan, and that the Long Lake Fire Department needed to
develop a long-term plan for vehicle replacement to enable Orono to make
determinations regarding the level of funding required.
In response. Long Lake provided the attached eighteen year capital improvement
plan with a total cost of $634,000. More recently. Long Lake has prepared the
attached five year vehicle replacement forecast that has moved the replacement of the
fire engine from 1999 to 2002, but has also added a tank with a pump, and an engine
with an aerial ladder, that were not a part of the initial capital improvement plan. The
replacement of the heavy rescue vehicle has also been moved from the year 2003 to
the year 2000 at a cost of $175,000 vs. the initial planned cost of $140,000.
Although the purchase of the light rescue vehicle and utility truck has sigmficantly reduced
the balance in the City's fire vehicle replacement account, the replacement of a fire engine
in 2003 can still be accomplished with minor adjustments to the current annual fire
equipment replacement funding level. However, if any qqs of the three other vehicles is to
be purchased in the timeframe reflected in the five year forecast, the City's annual funding
amount would need to more than double from its current level of $20,000 per year.
Based on the potential substantial costs to Orono related to both a new fire facility and new
fire vehicles, staff recommends the City of Orono have substantial involvement in the
process of determining equipment and facility needs.
lity
•Jilt.
Owner:City of Orono. PO Box 66. Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 Date: October 2.1998
For Period: August 17,1998 to October 2,1998 Request No:
* ^ ^ ^
“?JIS!SiI!22ricontractor G.L. Contracting. Inc.. 4300 Willow Drive. Medina. MN 55340
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT
EDGEWOOD HILLSmERITAGE DRIVE
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
File No. 139-98-099
279,194.07
279,194.07
188311.71
188,311.71
9,415.59
178,896.12
51367.36
127,528.76
Contract Unit Quantity Amount
Item Unit Quantity Price to Date'to Date
1 8" PVC. SDR 35. 8*- 10* deep in place LF 45 20.40 61.5 1.254.60
2 8" PVC. SDR 35. 10 ’-12' deep in place LF 680 22.20 635 14.097.00
3 8" PVC. SDR 35. 12’-14’ deep in place LF 320 24.50 260 6.370.00
4 8- PVC. SDR 35.14’-16' deep in place LF 230 27.50 286 7.865.00
5 8 ’ PVC. SDR 35.16 -18’ deep in place LF 300 31.40 300 9.420.00
6 Connect 8” PVC to existing manhole EA 1 2.057.70 1 2.057.70
7 Std. MH 8* dp.. 4’ dia., w/R1642B cstg.EA 9 1.552.40 9 13.971.60
8 MH depth greater than 8‘ deep LF 39 •124.60 38.8 4.834.48
9 Clean out manhole as per detail EA 1 1.867.40 1 1.867.40
10 Directional bore 8" HDPE SDR 17 LF soo 47.50 489.5 23.251.25
11 3" HDPE. SDR 11. trenched in place LF 810 13.10 1204 15.772.40
12 Connect 3" HDPE to manhole as per detail EA 1 523.00 1 523.00
13 1-1/2” curb stop & box. installed as per detail LF 5 190J0 7 1.332.10
14 3” X 3" HDPE tee EA 5 55.30 7 387.10
15 3" X 1-1/2” HDPE reducer EA 5 36.80 7 257.60
16 1-1/2" HDPE SDR 11 LF 200 10.70 200 2.140.00
17 8” X 4” PVC or HDPE compatible service
wye branch EA 13 168.00 17 2.856.00
18 4" PVC service pipe in place. SDR 26 LF 480 13J0 480 6.480.00
19 4” PVC service riser pipe in place. SDR 26 LF 170 13.50 170 2.295.00
20 Improved pipe fdn. in 6” increment depth LF 3.150 3.20 100 320.00
21 Mechanical trench compaction LF 2.250 0.10 2200 220.00
22 Sanitary sewer television inspection LF 2.075 1.10
23 Traffic control LS 0.75 2.351.30 0.75 1.763.48
Total Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer 119335.71
Part 2 - Restoration
24 Bituminous surfacing removal SY 2.600 2.00 2100 4.200.00
25 Common excavation CY 700 7.80 700 5.460.00
26 Class 5 aggregate base (100% crushed)TN 1.400 12.60 1032 13.003.20
27 Type 31 bituminous base course TN 230 35.80 358 12.816.40
28 Type 41A bituminous wearing course TN 380 30J0
29 Geotextile fabric SY 1.700 1.40 1300 1.820.00
30 Bituminous material for tack coat GL 50 2.20
31 Bituminous street patching SY 590 24.90 680 16.932.00
32 Clearing and grubbing LS 0.90 13.224.00 0.9 11.901.60
r
33 Bituminous driveway restoration SY 1,200 14.10
34 Concrete driveway restoration SF 600 7.40
35 Remove existing CMP culvert LF 40 1030
36 Furnish and install 15'* CMP culvert LF 40 21.00
37 15"CMPnarcdend EA 2 132.50
38 Sod with k” topsoil SY 14,500 2.60
39 Seed with topsoil, mulch and fertilizer AC 0.1 4.408.00
40 Erosion control fence
41 Furnish and plant Evergreen Tree (Blue
LF 1,500 3.30
Spruce) 6' high
42 Furnish and plant shade tree (Sugar Maple)
EA 6 385.70
4* diameter EA 6 41330
43 Remove and transplant bushes EA 6 82.70
44 Remove and transplant tree • Desiduous EA 6 385.70
45 Remove and transplant tree • Coniferous
Total Part 2 - Restoration
EA 6 385.70
Total Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer
Total Part 2 - Restoration
Total Work Completed To Date
I.A135M3WSWEQUEST2.WB2
80. 1.128.00
169 557.70
1,157.10
68,976.00
119335.71
68,976.00
188311.71
1
PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS
Owner CITY OF ORONO
Project No. 139-98-099
FUe No. 139-98-099
Contractor G.L. CONTRACTING INC
CHANGE ORDERS
No.Date Description Amount
1 •
2
3
Total Change Orders
PAYMENT SUMMARY
1 07/29/98 08/17/98 5U67.36 2.703.55 54.070.90
2 08/17/98 10/02/98 127.528.76 9.415.59 188.311.71
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Material on Hand
Total Payment to Date S178.896.I2 Original Contract $279,194.07
Retainage. Payment No. 2 9.415.59 Change Orders
Total Amount Earned $188,311.71 Revised Contract $279,194.07
l:\139M 39O0\nEOUEST2.WB2
r
COl'.v
OCT 1 2 iJJb
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
CIT>'C- -
DATE: October 9. 1998
ITEM NO.
Department Approval:
Name Gregory A. Gappa
Title Director of Public Services
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Public Services
Item Description: Revised Assessment Roll Resolution for Shoreline/Heritage Sanitary Sewer
Rroiect - Resolution
Construction is nearly complete on this project with sodding and paving of the final lift of
bituminous pavement in 1999 left to be completed. Construction went very well for this project,
with no unexpected problems, so the project costs are substantially lower than estimated. The
original assessment roll, which was adopted at the June 29th assessment of $19,100 per unit. This
was based on 20 properties being assessed for the project.
There are two lots that were platted in the original subdivision that have been owned by an adjacent
landowner outside the subdivision ever since the lots were platted. These were purchased to provide
a buffer between the subdivision and the adjacent parcel. This subdivision was platted in the 1960's
before the current zoning regulations were in effect, so all of the lots in the subdivision are non-
conforming and are all approximately one acre in size. The original proposal was not to assess the
two vacant non-conformmg lots, so as to not imply any zoning or development rights for these lots.
Also the property owner has no intention of selling or development these lots, at this time, and would
have likely appealed the assessment.
The assessment of these two vacant lots was questioned by one of the citizens at the assessment
hearing. The Council indicated that based on the development of all of the other lots, the two vacant
lots would most likely be considered buildable in the future. Development of these lots with septic
would be difficult, but with sanitary’ sewer available, it would be feasible to develop these lots. The
Council directed staff to review' the ability of these parcels, and to include them in the project for the
calculation of the per-unit assessments if staff found that they would most likely be considered
buildable. Staff is recommending these lots be included in the calculation of the per-unit
assessments, fhis will lower the unit cost for all of the other properties in the project. The City will
carry the costs for these lots until they are developed at which time the costs will be covered through
a coimection fee.
Due to costs substantially low'cr than estimated, and based on the costs for project completion
distributed over 22 parcels, versus the original 20 parcels, the per unit project assessment will be
$15,500. The feasibility study assessment estimate was $19,100 per unit.
r
Revised Project Assessment Shoreline/Heritage Sanitary Sewer
October 9, 1998
Page 2
Revised Assessment Interest Rate
An interest rate of 8% per year was included in the original assessment roll. We are recommending
a revised interest rate of 6.25%. This is the same interest rate that was presented at the Orono
Orchards project public hearing. The proposed plan is to sell bonds in 1999 to cover the costs for
the 1999 construction, Orono Orchards project and this project. The assessment interest rate for the
1997 projects, based on a 4.97% bond interest rate was 6.25% based on current trends, we are
anticipating a stable bond market and similar interest rates for next year.
Requests for Project Exclusion
Three property owners have requested exclusion from the project. The assessment hearing notice
indicated that property owners needed to request exclusion from the project at that time. Two written
requests were received before the assessment hearing and were listed in the assessment hearing staff
memo. One additional resident requested exclusion at the assessment hearing. Subsequent
investigation of the septic system proved the existence of a conforming septic for this property. No
additional requests for exclusion have been received.
The three property owners requesting exclusion are listed below:
Daniel and Barbara Hoffman
Jorgen and Lucille Viltoft
C E and K Rusch
1135 Heritage Lane
1155 Heritage Lane
1920 Shoreline Drive
A connection fee will be charged for these properties when a sewer connection is requested.
The estimated annual City costs for debt service for a $15,500 assessment at a 5% bond interest rate
for five properties will be $7,300. This includes the two vacant lots and the three properties
excluded from the project.
Notices to the property owners describing the prepayment options available will be sent to the
properties after adoption of the revised assessment roll. The assessment roll needs to be submitted
to the County by December 1 st.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval of the attached resolution adopting the revised assessment roll for the Shoreline/Heritage
Sanitary Sewer Project.
forcemain
GRAVITY SEWER
GRAVITY MANHOLE
residential
grinder station
HERITAGE DRIVE
ORONO, MINNESOTA
SANITARY SEWER
M
FIGURE 4
Bonestroo
Rosene
Anderlik &
Associates
Engineers A Architects
1391004.DWG 2/20/98 COMM. 139100
r
i I
A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE
INTEREST RATE AND DATE APPLIED TO THE
SHORELINE DRIVE, HERITAGE DRIVE AND
HERITAGE LANE AREAS SANITARY SEWER ASSESSMENT
ROLL, AS ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION NO. 4106
WHEREAS, the City Council of Orono, Minnesota established the interest rate at
8.00%, and the effective interest date as June 29, 1998, on the assessments for the improvement of
sanitary sewer in the Shoreline/Heritage area by passage of Resolution No. 4106; and
WHEREAS, the City Council intends to amend said interest rate based on the
4.973% interest rate of the bonds sold for the 1997 sanitary sewer improvement projects and the
projected interest rate for a possible future bond sale to finance this project; and
Minnesota:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Orono,
1. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a
period of 15 years, the first of the installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in
January 1998, and shall bear interest at the rate of 6.25% per annum from November 1,1998.
To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire ..issessment from November 1,
1998, until December 31, 1999. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added
interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
2. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the
assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole assessment on such property, with interest
charged to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged
if the entire assessment is paid within thirty (30) days of October 14,1998, and he may, at
any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining
unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made.
Such payment must be made before November 30 in 1998, or before November 15 in a
subsequent year or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding
year.
Page 1 of2
3. Partial prepayment is allowed in accordance with Ordinance No. 160, Second Series,
adopted May 12,1997.
4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the
County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessments
shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting
held October 12,1998.
ATTEST:
Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk
Page 2 of2
Special Assessment Certification Roll for Shoreline/Heritage Sanitary SewerMunicipal Code: 38Project Number: 98-2 SHORELINE/HERITAGE
Levy Description: Special Assessment for Sanitary Sewer Installation
Interest Rate: 6.25% Number of Years Payable: 15
Municipality: ORONO
Levy Number:
Total Project Assessment: S263,500.
/
PIDH Addition
Code
Total
Principal
Lot Block Name Street
U
Property Address Mailing Street Address
Mailing City Address
Units
10-117-23 12 0005 42265 15,500.00 I 2 STEPHEN & LUCINDA
LARSON
1005 HERITAGE LA 1005 HERTIAGE LA
WAYZATA MN 55391
1
10-117-23 13 0002 42265 15,500.00 2 1 LOWELL JANKE 1180 HERITAGE LA 1180 HERITAGE LA
WAYZATA MN 55391
1
10-117-23 13 0003 42265 15,500.00 3 1 RAY ZITZLOFF 1160 HERITAGE LA 1160 HERITAGE LA
WAYZATA MN 55391
I
10-117-23 13 0004 42265 15,500.00 4 1 A A & V C NICKLOW 1150 HERITAGE LA 1150 HERITAGE LA
WAYZATA MN 55391
1
10-117-23 13 0005 42265 15,500.00 5 1 KURT RETZLER 1100 HERITAGE LA 1100 HERITAGE LA
WAYZATA MN 55391
1
10-117-23 13 0008 42265 15,500.00 2 2 DEAN PATTERSON 1025 HERITAGE LA 1025 HERITAGE LA
WAYZATA MN 55391
1
10-117-23 13 0009 42265 15,500.00 3 2 BLAIR & NANCY
BJERKE
1035 HERITAGE LA 1035 HERITAGE LA
WAYZATA MN 55391
I
10-117-23 13 0010 42265 15,500.00 4 2 JAMES SNYDER 1085 HERITAGE LA 1085 HERITAGE LA
WAYZATA MN 55391
1•
10-117-23 13 0013 42265 15,500.00 3 3 DAVID SCOTT 1905 HERITAGE DR 1905 HERITAGE DR I
WAYZATA MN 55391
PID#Addition Total Lot Block NameCode Principal Street Property Address »Mailing Street Address Mailing City Address Units
r
COUNCIL
OCT 1 2 1998
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ciTYCr CRONO
DATE: October 12, 1998
ITEM NO.:
Department Approval:
Name Gregory A. Gappa
Title Director of Public Services
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Engineer's Report
Item Description: No Parking Resolution for Femdale Road North
Municipal State Aid Finds will be used for the reconstruction of Femdale Road North to a 28 foot
wide urban section road. State Aid mles require that the road be restricted to "No Parking
Anytime" on both sides of the road. This is the same as North Brown Road, which was also
reconstructed to a 28 foot width. The City of Plymouth will also approve a no parking resolution
for their side of the road.
The approved resolutions from both Cities need tobe submitted with the plans and specifications
for State Aid review and approval.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to approve Femdale Road North No Parking Resolution
I '
A RESOLUTION RELATING TO
PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON
FERNDALE ROAD NORTH
SJLP. 152-110-01 from Trunk Highway No. 12 to County State Aid Highway No. 6 in the City of Orono,
Minnesota.
THIS RESOLUTION, passed this 12th day of October, 1998, by the City of Orono m
Hennepin County, Minnesota. The Municipal corporation shall hereinafter be called the ' City ,
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the "City" has planned the improvement of Femdale Road North (MSAS 1 10)
from Trunk Highway No. 12 to County State Aid Highway No. 6.
WHEREAS, the "City", will be expecting Municipal State Aid Funds on the improvement
of this Street, and
WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on Iwth sides
of the street; and approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State Aid Street project must
therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS THEREBY RESOLVED, that the "City", shall ban the
parking of motor vehicles on Femdale Road North (MS AS 110) at all times.
1998.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held October 12,
Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk
I
1
i '
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
council..
OCT 12 iyy8
CfTY C ' . P/.' NO
DATE: October 12. 1998
ITEM NO •= H
Department Approval:
Name Gregory A. Gappa
Title Director of Public Services
Administrator Reviev/ed:
Item Description: Golf Course Painting
Agenda Section:
Engineer's Report
Attached you will find a memo from Ron Steffenhagen, Golf Course Manager regarding an
artist's painting of one of the golf course holes. Next year is the 75th anniversary of the opening
of the Orono Golf Course. This could be a good way to recognize this event. Approximately
25,000 rounds of golf ar^ played at the course each season, with only about fifty senior citizen
season passes sold each year. This means that are a substantial number of people, that play golf
at the course each year, that would be potential customers for the purchase of a painting.
The cost is $5,000 for 480 prints. At $25 per print, sale of the first 200 prints would recover the
costs. Two hundred of the prints would have a 75th anniversary logo on them. Purchase of these
paintings would be funded from the Golf course fund. The fund balance is about $200,000. I will
have a sample painting at the Council meeting for your review.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Discuss/Approve purchase of 480 prints of a golf course hole painting for $5,000 for resale at the
golf course. Funding would be from the golf course fund.
TO:Greg Gappa, Director of Public Services
FROM; Ron Steffenhagen, Golf Course Superintendent
DATE;October 1,1998
SUBJECT: Painting for Golf Course 75th anniversary
Mi Jon Wright is a well known artist in the Twin City area. He has agreed to paint a golf hole of
our choosing. He would take a number of picnues and we would ehoose which one we wanted him
to psdnt.
He requires $1,000 as he starts his work this October. He would do his painting this winter. When
he is about half done he would show us his work and ask about any changes. When we apee a
point he would require another $2,000. When he finishes the painting he would require another
$2,000 for a total cost of $5,000.
For that we would receive 480 prints and could sell them at any price. We also would get 1 toge
print, matted and framed. The first 200 prints could have a diamond in the comer noting our 75th
anniversar> next year, (1924-1999).
Those 200 prints could be priced at $25. thus recouping our costs. We could dso charge a fee for
having tournaments at Orono. The fee could be $25. and would include a free pnnt. We have
approximately 25 tournaments a year at Orono.
jig
— - ,------r-J*V.
r
C'Jui ------ t i,
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
OCT 1 2 1996
c cV C•RO^>^
DATE: October 9,1998
ITEM NO:
Department Approval:
Name Ron Moorse
Title City Administrator
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
City Administrator's
Report
Item Description: Renewal of Participation in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act Local
Housing Incentive Program
The City has participated in the Livable Communities Act program since 1996. This has involved
the adoption of a set of housing goals and the development of a housing action plan. The
Metropolitan Council has requested that the City update its housing goals as part of the City's overall
update of its Comprehensive Plan.
A new resolution is needed each year to continue the City's participation in the Metropolitan Livable
Communities Act program. A resolution is attached for Council adoption.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to adopt a resolution renewing the City's participation in the Metropolitan Livable
Communities Act Local Housing Incentive Piogram for calendar year 1999.
CALENDAR YEAR 1999
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act (Mmne^ta Statutes
tn 47“? 254'i establishes a Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund which is mtended to address
o" elopmen, issues facing .he metropolitan area deftned by MinnesoU Smm.es
Section 473.121; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund, comprising the T« B^e
Revitalization accoi.nt, the Livable Communities Demonstration Account and the Local Housing
Incentive Account, is intended to provide certain funding arsd other assistance to metropolitan area
municipalities; and
WHEfCEAS, a metropolitan area municipality is not eligible to receive 8”^“ ^
the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund or eligible to receive certmn polluted
Lding f^m the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic
^nicipality is participating in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program under die Minnesota
Statutes Section 473.254; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act required ^e Metropolitan
,0 negcdaVe ^h each munici^li.y to establish affordable and life-cycle housing gods for the
munidpality that are consistent with and promote the policies of the Metropolitan Council as
provided in the adopted Metropolitan Development guide; and
WHEREAS, each municipality must identify to the Metropolitan Council
municipality plans to take to meet the esmblished housing goals through preparation of Housing
Action Plan; and
WHEREAS; the Metropolitan Council adopted, by resolution after a public hearing,
negotiated affordable vnd life-cycle housing goals for each participating mumcipa i y, an
Page I of2
1 »
WHEREAS, a metropolitan area municipality which elects to participate in the Local
Housing Incentives Account Program must do so by November 15 of each year; and
WHEREAS, for calendar year 1999, a metropolitan area municipality that participated in
the Local Housing Incentive Account Program during the calendar year 1998, can continue to
participate under Minnesota Statutes Section 473.254 only if: (a) the municipality elects to
participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program by November 15,1998; and (b) the
Metropolitan Council and the municipality have successfully negotiated affordable and life-cycle
housing goals for the municipality.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of Orono hereby elects to
participate in the Local Housing Incentives Program under the Metropolitan Livable Communities
Act during the calendar year 1999.
Adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held October 12,1998.
Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk
Page 2 of2
^ ^ s> i W. I » 1 — — • • * •
OCT 1 2 1998
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION , ^
DATE: October 9,1998
ITEM NO: Up
Department Approval:
Name Ron Moorse
Title City Administrator
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
City Administrator's
Report
Item Description: Lighting for City Facilities Parking Areas
The existing external lighting for the City facilities does not provide adequate lighting for the
parking areas. The existing lighting is adequate only for the sidewalk and entrance areas. The lack
of lighting in the parking lot areas causes a number of safety problems. Those leaving work after
dark must walk to their cars in a dark parking lot. There have been instances of vandalism to cars
in the Police parking lot.
To address these problems, the 1998 budget includes funding for the installation of parking lot
lighting. The lighting plan is to install three 20' light poles, each with two light fixtures. The
attached materials show the location of the poles and the design of the poles.
Staff has worked with several contractors to develop a lighting plan that provides sufficient light to
all parking areas, and to obtain price quotes for the purchase and installation of the lighting.
Electricity is to be provided to the lights through three underground conduits that run to the three
light pole locations.
The low bid for the purchase and installation of the light poles and fixtures is from Frontier Electric
at a price of $5,995.00. Staff recommends accepting the lowest cost proposal by Frontier Electric
to enable installation of the lights this fall.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
i
Date:September 29,1998
To:Ron Moorse, City Administrator
From: Gary Cheswick, Chief of Police,
Subject: Parking Lot Lighting
As we had discussed previously, the lowest proposal submitted came from Frontier
Electric Company of Excelsior.
The written estimate provided by the owner specified a cost of $5,995.00 for three
(3) light poles with twin 250 Watt HPS flood fixtures on time clock control, based
on existing PVC conduit to each pole location. (This had previously been verified.)
If additional conduit needs to be installed, a cost of $3 per foot will be charged. No
additional costs are foreseen.
]lroposal
FRONTIER ELECTRIC CO
800 Water Street i
EXCELSIOR. MINNESOTA 553
4743201
PROPOSAL SUBfcfITTEO TO
City of Orono
PHONE '
STREET
2730 Kelley Parkvray
JOB NAME
CITY. STATE tn<J ZIP CODE
Orono, ICl 55356
JOB LOCATION
ARCHITECT
Attn: Gary Cheswicl:
DATE OF PLANS
We hereby submit speofications arKt estimates for.•
Furnish and Install 20* Steal Poles tiith Twin 250 Uatt H?3 Flood fixtures
On Time Clock Control.
ILMERIAL, LABOR AlTD PERMIT
P. S. Priced Based On Existing FVC Conduit to Each Pole Location.
(If conduit is not In ground to source the cost to run it(wire,contuit)
w^ll be $3o00 a foot.
Cut Enclosed Crouse Hinds ARlOAl S22
•*. .a. •« i
Itlf Propose hereby to furnish material and labor — complete in accordance with above specificatioQS, for the sum of:
Five Thousand Mine Hundred ninety Five and Ho/I00 ~dollars (S 5,995.00
PaytTwni lo b« made as follows:
P'1
All mattnai is guaranteed to be as specified Ait work to be completed tn a workmanlike
manner according to stardard practices Any atteraiior* or deviation frem aCo>e spec it cations
involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders, and w '.t become an extra
charge over and above Ibe estimate All agreements contingent upon strikes accidents
Of delays beyond our control Owner to carry fire, tornado and ot^ef necessar/ insurance
Our workers are My covered by Workman s Compensation Insurance
Authorized ^
Signature
Note This proposal may be
wilhdra.vn by us if not accepted .vth.r.days.
'^Acccptfllicc of |Jr0p0Snl — The abov« pricei. spectlications
and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted \bu are authorized Signature
to do the work as specified Payment will bo made as out'.red aoeve
\
Dale of Acceptance Signature
/.
r
PA SERIES
? '
POLES
BULiniNPA
RUUD
LIGHTING
INCORPORATED
J.
SPEC. #CATALOG »DIMENSIONS
PA3S10C ’BZ 10' (3.0 m)X3‘(76 mm)
PA3S15C *BZ 15‘ (4.6 m)X4’(102 mm)
PA4S15C *BZ 15'(4.6 m)X4-(t02mm)
PA4S200 *BZ 20' (6.1 m)X4*(l02mml
PA5S250 *BZ 25 (7.6 m)X 5’(127 mm)
PA6S300 'BZ 30' (9.1 m)X6*(152 mm)
-Specify pole configuration.
• 1 1* • •
• 1 •
• • 1
r0l6 Cap.
(Supplied if tenon
is not used.)
Square, Non-tapered Pole
12-(305 mm) ^ .X
Two Piece Aluminum
Base Plate Cover
^e»o
>•
Hand Hole Cover
Aluminum Angle
Base Plate
Anchor
Bolt Hole
CE ERAL DESCRIPTION: Square, non-tapered pole of extruded aluminum (6063-T6); with a minimum yield strength
of 25.000 p.s.i. Welded to a base plate fabricated of structural aluminum angle (6061-T6);
with a minimum yield strength of 30.000 p.s.i. Pole is supplied with a two piece alumi
num base cover and four hot dip galvanized steel anchor bolts, with masonite mounting
^rnplate. Each bolt is provided with two washers and two nuts. Per National Electrical
Code requirements, polo is standard with a 2" (51 mm) x 4" (102 mm) hand hole, located
12 (305 mm) to 24" (610 mm) above bottom of pole base. A 10-32 stainless-aleel weld
stud with grounding lug is located inside pole, opposite hand hole: a hand hole cover is
________________ supplied. For E.P.A. ratings, see windloading sheet.
FINISH: Pole and base cover are finished with a bronze durable acrylic thermoset powder finish,
_________________ with excellent resistance to ultra violet, abrasion, fading and weather.
COUNCIL r/E£TiNCi
OCT 1 2 i998
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
(.11 V 0-0no*^;0
DATE; October 9, 1998
ITEM NO = n
Department Approval:
Name RonMoorse
TUIe City Administrator
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
City Administrator’s
Report
Item Description: Budget Amendment to Reflect the Cost of the County Road 15 Traffic Study
The City Council at its September 28 meeting approved a County Road 15 traflBc study at a cost of
$20,000. A budget adjustment is necessary to reflect this additional expenditure. Staflf recommends
a budget adjustment to increase expenditures in the Special Projects Contingency account of the
General Fund.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to amend the Special Projects Contingency account of the General Fund to reflect the
additional expenditure of $20,000 for the County Road 15 traffic study.
Cjur,.
OCT 1 2 1996
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: October 9,1998
ITEM NO: / ^
Department Approval:
Name RonMoorse
Title City Administrator
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
City Administrator’s
Report
Item Description: Resolution Authorizing an Agreement with Mn/DOT for the Highway 12
Noise and Vibration Study
Mn/DOT has agreed to fund a noise and vibration study related to the Highway 12 upgrade project.
This requires a cooperative agreement between the City and Mn/DOT. A resolution authorizing the
City to enter into a cooperative agreement with Mn/DOT needs to be attached to the cooperative
agreement. A re.solution is attached for Council adoption.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing the City to enter into a cooperative agreement with
Mn/DOT through which Mn/DOT will fund a noise and vibration study related to the Highway 12
upgrade project, and authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to sign the agreement.
! .
I:
i‘ *
I
! i
^ '
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING
THE CITY OF ORONO TO ENTER INTO A
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH MN/DOT
RELATED TO A NOISE AND VIBRATION STUDY
FOR THE HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR PROJECT
WHEREAS, proposals have been requested from consulting firms for conducting
a noise and vibration study for the Highway 12 corridor; and
WHEREAS, HDR Engineering, Inc. has submitted a proposal for a noise and
vibration study; and
WHEREAS, the proposal has been reviewed by the City of Orono, the City of Long
Lake, and Mn/DOT engineering staff; and
WHEREAS, HDR Engineering, Inc. has been selected to conduct the noise and
vibration study; and
WHEREAS, Mn/DOT has agreed to fund the noise and vibration study, and
WHEREAS, this requires a cooperative agreement between Mn/DOT and the City
of Orono.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Orono does hereby authorize the City to enter into a cooperative agreement with Mn/DOT related
to the noise and vibration study, and does also hereby authorize the Mayor and City Administrator
to sign the cooperative agreement.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting
held this 12th day of October, 1998.
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
Page 1 of 1
OCT 1 2 1998
^^7vo•■ono^eo
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: October 9, 1998
ITEM NO: / ^
I I
Department Approval:
Name RonMoorse
Title City Administratoi
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
City Administrator’s
Rqwrt
Item Description: Work Session Topics
There are a number of items requiring Council attention that can be addressed in a Council work
session. These include the following;
1.Meeting with the Orono School Board regarding cooperation and coordination
between the City and the School Board to ensure the Orono Schools building project
goes smoothly.
2.
3.
Presentation of the draft Surface Water Management Plan by Bonestroo Associates.
Annual City Administrator Performance Evaluation.
4. Review of the "Final" Highway 12 Preliminary Layout to be completed in late
October.
The Council may want to select a set of dates for work sessions to address these items,
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to select dates and times for upcoming Council work sessions.
• fee j j,. ^
OCT 1 2 1998
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Q<TYorGf^n^^-Q
DATE: Octobers, 1998
ITEM NO: ^ O
Department Approval:
Name Lin Vee
Title City Clerk
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Licenses
Item Description: List of Licenses for Council Approval
There are no licenses.
\
I
8 Oct 1998
Thu 1:17 PM
Check
Number
Check Register
City of Orono
Date Name
Check Number • 56517 RED APRON CATERING
56517 O0-Oct-98 RED APRON CATERING
Totals Check Number 56517 RED APRON CATERING
Check Number
56518
56518 SCHERER MEAT CO.
08-Oct-98
Totals Check Nunber
SCHERER MEAT CO.
56518 SCHERER MEAT CO.
Check Number
56519
56519 HANSEN, STEVEN C.
08-Oct-98
Totals Check Number
HANSEN, STEVEN C.
56519 HANSEN, STEVEN C,
Check Number
56520
56520 HANSEN, STEVEN C.
oa-oct-98
Totals Check Number
HANSEN, STEVEN C
56520 HANSEN. STEVEN C
Check Number
56521
56521 JOimSON. MARY ANN
08-Oct-98
Totals Check Number
JOIDISON. MARY ANN
56521 JOHNSON, MARY ANN
Check Number
56522
i»6522 GREGORY, JAMES
08-Oct-98
Totals Check Number
GREGORY, JAMES
56522 GREGORY, JAMES
Check Number
56523
56523 YO»JNGDAHL COMPANIES
08-Oct-98
Totals Check Number
YOUNGDAHL COMPANIES
55523 YOUNGDAHL COMPANIES
Check Number
56524
56524 RED APRON CATERING
08'Oct-98
Totals Check Number
RED APRON CATERING
56524 RED APRON CATERING
Check Number
56525
56525
56525 CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH
CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH
Transaction
Amount
68.90
68.90
98.55
98.55
37.83
37.83
152.47
152.47
13.81
13.81
86.92
86.92
60.00
60.00
42.33
42.33
13.08
5.15
COUNCIL l/toW .t; J
OCT 1 2 1996
Comments
CITY or one*'; J
SALAD FOR EMP PIQIIC
MEAT FOR EMP PICNIC
POP k FRUIT - PICNIC
PICTJIC SUPPLIES
GAMES - PICNIC
ICE.CORN.TOMAIOES-PICNIC
COBRA SEMINAR
MTG W/UNION
POLICE PETTY CASH REIM
POLICE PETTY CASH REIM
8 Oct 1998
Thu 1:17 PM
Check
Number
Q>eck Number
56525
56525
56525
56525
56525
56525
56525
56525
56525
56525
56525
56525
56525
56525
56525
56525
56525
56525
Check Register
City of Orono
Page 2
Date
56525 CITY
08-Oct-98
O0-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
Name
OF ORONO PETTY CASH
CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH
CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH
CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH
CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH
CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH
CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH
CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH
CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH
CITY OP ORONO PETTY CASH
CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH
CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH
CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH
CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH
CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH
CITY OP ORONO PETTY CASH
CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH
CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH
CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH
Totals Check Number 56525 CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH
Check Number
56526
56526 MN COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASSOC.
08-0ct-98
Totals Check Number
MN COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASSOC.
56526 MN COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASSOC.
Check Number
56527
56527
56527
56527
56527 MN DEPT OF REVENUE
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
Oa-Oct-98
Totals Check Number
MN DEPT OF REVENUE
MN DEPT OF REVENUE
MN DEPT OF REVENUE
MN DEPT OF REVENUE
56527 DEPT OF REVENUE
Check Number
57092
57092 BERETTA USA
08-Oct-98
Totals Check Number
BERETTA USA
57092 BERETTA USA
Check Number
57144
57144 PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS
08-Oct-98
Totals Check Number
PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS
57144 PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS
Check Number
57277
57277 SWENSON ELECTRONICS
08-Oct-99
Totals Check Number
SWENSON ELECTRONICS
57277 SWENSON ELECTRONICS
Transaction
Amount
5.56
2.38
10.66
2.98
10.00
12.71
3.82
3.18
1.42
1.24
7.45
2.65
8.51
6.82
9.57
9.27
0.78
1.50
118.73
24.05
24.05
24.00
17.00
225.00
2.337.00
2.603.00
-150.00
-150.00
2,381.87
2,381.87
-62.60
-62.60
Comments
POLICE PETTY CASH REIM
POLICE PETTY CASH REIM
POLICE PETTY CASH REIM
POLICE PETTY CASH REIM
POLICE PETTY CASH REIM
ADDING MACHINE TAPE
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
LIN VEE
POSTAGE
POSTAGE
POSTAGE
POSTAGE
PHONE CORD
FUSES
CHLORINE
3 RING BINDERS
POSTAGE
PARKING-GVT CENTER
DUI FORFEIT FORMS
SALES TX 8/98
SALES TX 8/98
SALES TX 8/98
SALES TX 8/98
VOID TRAINING B JOHNSON
VOID-FOUNTAIN-GC
VOID - VCR REPAIR
8 Oct 1998
Thu 1:17 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Page 3
Check
Number Date Name
Transaction
Amount Comments
Check Number
57298
57298
57298
57298
57298
57298
57298
57298
57298
57298
57298
57298
57298
57298
57298
57298
57298
57298
57298 UNUM
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
08-Oct-98
LIFE INSURANCE
ONUM LIFE
UNUM LIFE
UNIW LIFE
UNUM LIFE
UNUM LIFE
L“NUM LIFE
UNUM LIFE
UNUM LIFE
UNUM LIFE
UNUM LIFE
UNUM LIFE
UNUM LIFE
UNUM LIFE
UNUM LIFE
UNUM LIFE
UNUM LIFE
UNUM LIFE
UNUM LIFE
- LIFE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
LIFE
LIFE
LIFE
LIFE
LIFE
LIFE
LIFE
LIFE
LIFE
LIFE
LIFE
LIFE
LIFE
LIFE
LIFE
LIFE
LIFE
LIFE
Totals Check Number 57298 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE - LIFE
7.36 LIFE INSURANCE
3.20 LIFE INSURANCE
130.08 LIFE INSURANCE
35.85 LIFE INSURANCE
94.22 LIFE INSURANCE
10.78 LIFE INSURANCE
4.62 LIFE INSURANCE
0.70 LIFE INSURANCE
167.89 LIFE INSURANCE
0.75 AD k D INSURANCE
0.45 AD &D INSURANCE
22.05 AD k D INSURANCE
7.20 AD k D INSURANCE
3.30 AD k D INSURANCE
3.89 AD k D INSURANCE
1.66 AD k D INSURANCE
0.15 AD k D INSURANCE
46.80 AD k D INSURANCE
540.95
Grand Total 1,253.07
r
8 Oct 1990
Thu 12:37 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
dumber Date Name
Check Number
57315
57315
57315
57315 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE
04-Mar-9S AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE
09-Jun-98 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE
09-Jun-98 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE
Totals Check Number 57315 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE
Check Number 57316 ANCHOR PAPER
57316 07-Oct-98 ANCHOR PAPER
Totals Check Number 57316 ANCHOR PAPER
Check Number 57317 AT fc T - TAMPA
57317 07-Oct-98 AT & T - TAMPA
Totals Check Number 57317 AT a T - TAMPA
Check Number 57318 AT a T HIRELESS SERVICES/AZ
57318
57318
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES/AZ
AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES/AZ
Totals Check Number 57318 AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES/AZ
Check Number 57319 ATfcT - KC
57319
57319
03-Aug-98
19-Mar-90
ATaT - KC
ATaT - KC
Totals Check Number 57319 ATaT - KC
Check Number 57320 AtXSIES MOBILE CHEF
57320 07-Oct-98 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF
Totals Check Number 57320 AtXSIES MOBILE CHEF
Check Number 57321 BENEFITS DESIGN GROUP
57321 07-Oct-98 BENEFITS DESIGN GROUP
Totals Check Number 57321 BENEFITS DESIGN GROUP
Transaction
Amount
440.27
13.60
13.59
467.46
634.95
634.95
1.60
1.60
7.04
7.05
14.09
40.84
17.11
57.95
51.92
51.92
1,067.25
1,067.25
Page 1
Comments
CELL PHONES
CELLULAR SERVICE
SERVICE 4/15-5/15
PAPER
LONG DISTANCE
WIRELESS SERVICES
WIRELESS SERVICES
LONG DISTANCE 7/98
LD VANG
HABURGERS, CHKWAGON
ADM FEE
Check Number 57322 BIFFS INC.•
57322 O7-Oct-90 BIFFS INC.66.76 PORTABLES e/98
57322 O7-Oct-90 BIFFS INC.133.52 PORTABLES 8/98
57322 O7-Oct-90 BIFFS INC.133.52 PORTABLES 8/98
57322 07-Oct-98 BIFFS INC.133.52 PORTABLES 8/98
Totals Check Number 57322 BIFFS INC.467.32
! f
8 Oct 1998
Thu 12:37 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Page 2
Check
Number Date Name
Check Number
57323
57323
57323
57323 BLACKOWIAK & SON
07-Oct-98 BLACKOWIAK & SON
07-Oct-98 BLACKOWIAK & SON
07-Oct-98 BLACKOWIAK & SON
Totals Check Number 57323 BLACKOWIAK k SON
Check Number 57328 CARLSON CONSTRUCTION
57328 08-Oct-98 CARLSON CONSTRUCTION
Total* Check Number 57328 CARLSON CONSTRUCTION
Check Number 57329 CITY OF RICHFIELD
57329 07-OCC-98 CITY OP RICHFIELD
Total* Check Number 57329 CITY OF RICHFIELD
Check Number 57330 CITY OF WAYZATA
57330 24-Oct-96 CITY OF WAYZATA
Total* Check Number 57330 CITY OF WAYZATA
Transaction
Amount Comments
157.80 WASTE SERVICE - 9/90
72.33 WASTE SERVICE - 9/98
191.72 WASTE SERVICE - 9/98
421.85
Check Number 57325 BONCSTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.
57325 07-Oct-98 BONESTROO ROSENE &ASSOC.3,098.99 WEBBER HILLS SAN SHR JULY
57325 07-Oct-98 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.4,656.71 HERITAGE OR SAN SHR JULY
57325 07-Oct-98 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.349.50 REBID EDGWD HILLS SAN SWR
57325 07-Oct-98 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.165.60 NAV HTR PLANT REHAB JULY
57325 07-Oct-98 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.221.25 BYRSG/BRXTS PT RFP »7
57325 07-Oct-98 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.1,344.53 BYRDG/BRKTS PT INSP JULY
57325 07-Oct-98 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.425.27 NLL/LLCC RFP #8 k 89
57325 07-Oct-98 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.2,161.81 NLL/LLCC INSP-EASMNT JULY
57325 07-Oct-98 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.92.50 FORCE MAIN BREAK-HENN CO
57325 07-Oct-9B BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.332.00 INSPECT US WEST ANTENNA
57325 07-Oct-98 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.240.50 TRAFFIC SIGNAL REVISIONS
57325 07-Oct-98 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.423.75 SAGA HILL PARK ACCESS
57325 07-Oct-98 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASbOC.567.51 ATTEND JULY COUNCIL MTGS
Totals Check Number 57325 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.14,079.92
Check Number 57325 BUDGET PRINTING
57326 07-Oct-98 BUDGET PRINTING 103.06 PD ENVELOPES
Total* Check Number 57326 BUDGET PRINTING 103.06
Check Number 57327 CAR--TEL
57327 07-Oct-98 CAR-TEL 122.84 PHONE FOR ELECTION
Total* Check Number 57327 CAR-TEL 122.84
3.500.00
3.500.00
GRINDING LL - STORM
91.50
91.60
ROOM FOR GFOA CONFERENCE
4.046.28
4.046.29
3RD OTR WATER CONSUMPTION
I
J
r
8 Oct 1998
Thu 12:37 PM
Check
Number
Check Number
57331
Check Register
City of Orono
Date Name
57331 CITYVIEW PLUMBING i HEATING
07-Oct-98 CITYVIEW PLUMBING & HEATING
Totals Check Number 57331 CITYVIEW PLUMBING & HEATING
Check Number
Transaction
Amount
100.75
108.75
Page 3
Comments
REPAIR MEN'S URINAL
57332 CYS UNIFORMS
57332
57332
57332
57332
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
Totals Check Number
CYS UNIFORMS
CYS UNIFORMS
CYS UNIFORMS
CYS UNIFORMS
57332 CYS UNIFORMS
93.85
345.15
184.80
140.85
764.65
SHIRT, TIE k EMBLEMS
COAT AND SHIRTS
SHIRTS k PANTS-TOMCHECK
CORNICE
Check Number 57333 E-Z RECYCLING
57333 07-Oct-98
Totals Check Number
B-Z RECYCLING
57333 E-Z RECYCLING
Check Number 57334 EARL P. ANDERSON k ASSOC.
5,583.48
5,583.48
SEPTEMBER RECYCLING
57334 07-Oct-98
Totals Check Number
EARL F. ANDERSON k ASSOC.
57334 EARL F. ANDERSON k ASSOC
Qieck Number
57335
57335
57335 EBERT CONSTRUCTION
07- Oct-98
08- Oct-98
Totals Check Number
EBERT CONSTRUCTION
EBERT CONSTRUCTION
57335 EBERT CONSTRUCTION
Check Number 57336 EXPRESS MESSENGER
529.37
529.37
276.00
10.070.00
10.346.00
BRIDGE k DUCK XING SIQIS
REPAIR CABLE BRACING
SALT SHED ROOF - STORM
57336 O8-Oct-90
Totals Check Number
EXPRESS MESSENGER
57336 EXPRESS MESSENGER
Check Number 57337 FRESHWATER FOUNDATION
40.95
40.95
DELIVERY TO HENN CTY
57337 07-Oct-9B
Totals Check Number
FRESHWATER FOUNDATION
57337 FRESHWATER FOUNDATION
Check Number
57338
57338 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS
03-Aug-98
Totals Check Number
FRONTIER COWUNICATIONS
57338 FRONTIER COWUNICATIONS
Check Number
57340
57340 Q k K SERVICES
07-Oct-99 G 4 K SERVICES
335.00
335.00
31.62
31.62
5.93
RM RENTAL 9/15/98
MNTHLY VOICE MAIL
STEFFQIHAGEN
8 Oct 1990
Thu 12:37 PM
Check
Number Date
Name
Check Number
57340
57340
57340
57340
57340
57340
57340
57340
57340
57340
57340
57340
57340
57340
57340
57340 G & K
07-Oct-98
O7-Oct-90
07-Oct-98
O7-Oct-90
O7-Oct-90
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
SERVICES
G & K
G & K
G & K
G Ik K
G & K
G & K
G fc K
G & K
G & K
G & K
G & K
G & K
G fc K
G & K
G & K
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
Totals Check Number 57340 G li K SERVICES
Check Number 57341 Q L CONTRACTING
57341 08-Oct-98 G L CONTRACTING
Totals Check Number 57341 G L CONTRACTING
Check Number 57342 GALL'S INC.
57342
57342
57342
07-Cct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
GALL'S INC.
GALL'S INC,
GALL'S INC.
Totals Check Number 57342 GALI/S INC.
Chieck Number 57343 GERRING'S CAR WASH
Check Register
City of Oi'ono
57343 07-Oct-98 GERRING'S CAR WASH
Totals Check Number 57343 GERRING'S CAR WASH
Check Number 57344 GREEN LIGHTS RECYCLING INC.
57344 07-Oct-98 GREEN LIGHTS RECYCLING INC
Totals Check Number 57344 GREEN LIGHTS RECYCLING INC
Check Number 57345 HAWKIN5 WA'TER TREATMENT GROUP
57345
57345
07-Oct-98
07.0ct-98
HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP
HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP
Totals dieck Number 57345 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP
Check Number 57346 HENNEPIN COUNTY 'TREASURER-GEN
57346 07-Oct-98 HENIIEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-GEN
Transaction
Amount
68.53
5.93
90.24
12.15
12.15
5.93
86.44
42.01
42.01
62.55
12.15
55.11
5.93
94.36
12.15
613.57
127,528.76
127,528.76
149.97
19.99
2.53
172.49
7.00
7.00
99.35
99.35
40.00
261.73
301.73
3,948.00
Page 4
Comments
UNIFORMS
STEFFENHAGEN
UNIFORMS
RATHBUN
RATHBUN
STEFFENHAGEN
MATS
MATS
MATS
SHOP TOWELS
RATHBUN
MATS PD
STEFFENHAGEN
UNIFORMS
RATHBUN
SHORELINE/HERITAGB RFP #2
MIC a CORD-SMART SIREN
SHIRT
SHIPPING & HANDLING
CAR WASH
FLOUR LIGHT DISPOSAL
DEMURRAGE
CHLORINE & HYDRFLUOS ACID
RM a BOARD 8/98
a Oct 1990
Thu 12:37 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Page 5
Check
Humber Date Name
Check Number 57346 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-GEN
Totals Check Number 57346 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-GEN
Check Number 57348 HIN5HAW k CULBERTSON
Check Hunger 57349 HUMANE SOCIETY OF WRIGHT CO
57349 07-Oct-98 HUMANE SOCIETY OF WRIGHT CO
Totals Check Number 57349 HUMANE SOCIETY OP WRIGHT CO
Check Number 57350 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
57350 07-Oct-98 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
Totals Check Number 57350 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
Check Number 57351 INTERSTATE BATTERIES
57351
57351
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-9B
INTERSTATE BATTERIES
INTERSTATE BATTERIES
Totals Check Number 57351 INTERSTATE BATTERIES
Check Number 57352 J H LARSON ELECTRICAL CO.
57352 O7-Oct-90 J H LARSON ELECTRICAL CO
Totals Check Number 57352 J H LARSON ELECTRICAL CC
Transaction
Amount Comments
3.948.00
57348 O7-Oct-90 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 99.00 AUGUST SERVICE
57348 07-Oct-98 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 1,100.18 AUGUST SERVICE
57340 07-Oct-98 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 88.00 MPRS LAWSUIT
57348 07-Oct-98 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 88.00 GORDON NELSON
57348 07-Oct-98 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 650.UO AUGUST SERVICE
57348 07-Oct-98 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 160.00 MOE TITLE REGISTRATION
57348 07-Oct-98 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 122.50 CR6/HCPW 53-08-96 AUG
57348 07-Oct-98 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 770.50 APPLICATION AUG
57348 07.Oct-98 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 559.59 POLICE LABOR MATTERS
57348 07-Oct-98 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 1.122.26 LEGAL SERVICES
57348 07-Oct-98 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 429.00 SAGA HILL LANJ TITLE
57348 07-Oct-98 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 44.00 GORDON NELSON
57348 07-Oct-98 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 682.00 MPRS LAWSUIT
57348 07-Oct-98 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 1.199.00 TELEPHONE SVCS CONTRACT
57348 07-Oct-98 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 1.526.00 EDGEWOOD HILLS EASEMENTS
57348 07-Oct-98 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 474.00 NLL/LLCC EASMENTS
57340 O7-Oct-90 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 174.00 OCB RD TRAIL EASEMENTS
57348 07-Oct-98 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 40.00 WOODHILL CC - ROAD DISPOT
57340 O7-Oct-90 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 421.44 GORDON NELSON
57348 07-Oct-98 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 11.744.67 LEGAL SERVICE MAR-JULY
57348 07-Oct-98 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 7,625.04 APPLICATIONS 2/27-7/28/98
Totals Check Number 57348 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 29,127.18
157.50 BOARD k EUTH
157.50
25.25
25.25
TONER k STAPLES
117.04
77.69
BATTERIES #712
BATTERY FOR SWEEPER
194.73
407.53
407.53
LIGHT BULBS
r
8 Oct 1998
Thu 12:37 PM
Check
ffumber
Check Kuniber
57353
Check Register
City of Orono
Date Name
57353 KENNETH N. POTTS, PA
07-Oct-98 KENNETH N. POTTS. PA
Totals Check Number 57353 KENNETH N. POTTS. PA
Check Number
57354
57354 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
22-Dec-97
Totals Check Number
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
57354 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
Check Number
57355
57355 LOGIS
07-Oct-98 LOGIS
Totals Qieck Number 57355 LOGIS
Check Number
57356
57356 LONG LAKE POHBR EQUIPMENT
07-Oct-98
Totals Check Number
LONG LAKE PONER EQUIPMENT
57356 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT
Check Number
57357
57357
57357 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
Totals Check Number
LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT
LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT
57357 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT
Check Number
57358
57350 LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGIES
08-Oct-98
Totals Check Number
LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGIES
57358 LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGIES
Check Number
57359
57359 MAGIC CLEANERS
07-Oct-98
Totals Check Number
MAGIC CLEANERS
57359 MAGIC CLEANERS
Check Number
57360
57360
57360 MBPTA
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
MiPTA
MBPTA
Totals Check Number 57360 MBPTA
Check Number
57361
57361 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER
07-Oct-98
Totals Check Number
MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER
57361 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER
Transaction
Amount
2.291.66
2.291.66
4.552.00
4.552.00
904.26
904.26
15.13
15.13
2.30
8.80
11.10
477.12
477.12
20.21
20.21
15.00
15.00
30.00
990.00
990.00
Page 6
Comments
SEPTEMBER PRO.SECUTICN
1997-98 DOES
PIMS AUGUST
POLE SAK REPAIR
SDIEH
CHAIN CONN LINK
OIL. FILTERS,WASHER FLUID
JAIL CLOTHES
6/14/98 MEETING
1998 DUES
SAC CHGS
r
0 Oct 1990
Thu 12i37 PM
Check
Number
Check Number
57362
Date Name
Check Register
City of Orono
57362 MIDWEST ASPHALT
O7-Oct-90 MIDWEST ASPHALT
Totals Check Number 57362 MIDWEST ASPHALT
Transaction
Amount
170.63
170.63
Page 7
Comments
PATCH
Check Number
57363
57363 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO
07-Oct-98
Totals Check Number
MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO
57363 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO
145.15
145.15
SCl’k
Check Number 57364 MINNCOMM
57364 O0-Oct-90
Totals Check Number
MINNCOftI
57364 MINNCOMM
2.58
2.58
TAX a FED SERVICE CHG
Number
S736S
57365
57365 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY
07-Oct-98
O7-Oct-90
Totals Check Number
MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY
MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY
57365 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY
Check Number
57366
57366
57366
57366 MINNEGASCO
09-Jun-98
09-Jun-98
09-Jun-98
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
13.50
27.00
40.50
Totals Check Number 57366 MINNEGASCO
10.40
136.76
135.24
282.40
OXYGEN
OXYGEN k ACETLYENE
GAS SERVICE
GAS SERVICE
GAS SERVICE
Check Number 57367 MINNETONKA SOUND 4 LIGHTING
57367 O0-Oct-98
Totals Check Number
MINNETONKA SOU^’O 4 LIGHTING
57367 MINNETONKA SOUND 4 LIGHTING
Check Number
57368
57368 MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION
07-Oct-98
Totals Check Number
MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION
57360 MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION
Check Number
57369
57369 NOBILE RADIO ENGINEERING INC.
O8-Oct-90
Totals Check Number
MOBILE RADIO ENGINEERING INC.
57369 MOBILE RADIO ENGi;.E£RING INC.
Check Number
57370
57370 MR AUGIES COFFEE SERVICE
07-Oct-98
Totals Check Number
MR AUGIES COFFEE SERVICE
57370 MR AUGIES COFFEE SERVICE
55.00
55.00
74.32
74.32
1,591.07
1,591.07
49.50
49.50
REPAIR FLOOR JACK
INSURANCE - BORIS
noble radios - REPLACXMQf
COFFEE
r 1
i
)
I i
8 Occ 1998
Thu 12:37 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Page 8
Check Transaction
Nutrber Date Name Amount CofTTnents
Check Number 57371 NAVARRE HARDWARE
57371 07.Oct-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 75.92 MISC SUPPLIES
Totals Check rrumber 57371 NAVARRE HARDNARF 75.92
Check Humber 57372 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS •
57372 07-Oct-98 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 132.00 OCTOBER LIFE
Totals Check Number 57372 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 132.00
Check Number 57373 NSP
57373 02-JU1-96 NSP 155.86 HWY 12 & WILLOW
57373 09-Jun-98 NSP 1,493.^4 ELECTICAL SERVICE
57373 2*’-Apr-90 NSP 1,287.64 ELEC SERVICE
57373 27-Apr-98 NSP 2.711 68 ELEC SERVICE
57373 27-Apr-98 NS?2,491.39 ELEC SERVICE
Totals Check Number •'7373 NSP 8,139.81
Check Humber 57374 OLD DUTCH foods:
57374 07-Oct-98 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC.11.55 CHIPS
Totals Check Nunujer 57374 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC.11.55
Check Number 57375 ORONO COIWNITY EDUCATION
57375 08-Oct-98 ORCNO COMMUNITY EDUCATION 2,438.56 SUMMER RECREATION 1993
Totals Check Number 57375 ORONO COMMUNITY EDUCATION 2,438.56
Check Number 57376 PI.:* •V' ./AUL
57376 08-Oct-'‘PHILLIPS,PAUL 150.00 PARTIAL REFUND 82430
Totals Check Number 57376 THILLIPS.PAUL 150.00
Check Number 57377 PIONEER
57377 08-Oct-98 PIONEER 16.18 AD FOR TES'i lNG SCAN SYST
57377 08-Oct-98 PIONEER 53.93 APPLICATIONS
57377 Oo-Oct-98 PIONEER 89.39 PROPOSED ASSES-ORONO ORCH
57377 08-Oct-98 PIONEER 40.07 NOT OF HRING-ASSESS SHORE
57377 08-Oct-98 PIONEER 52.41 NOTICE OF WORK SESSION
57377 08-Oct-98 PIONEER 23.37 APPLICATION 2^12
57377 08-Oct-98 PIONEER 30.56 BIDS FOR GENERATORS
57377 07-Oct-98 PIONEER 100.36 4/18 LAKER/PIONEER
57377 08-Oct-98 PIONEER 28.76 ORDINANCE 178
57377 08-Oct-98 PIONEER 48.53 AD-BIDS FOR l,S 13
Totals Check Number 57377 PIONEER 483.56
r
] I
6 Oct 1998
Thu 12:37 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Date Name
Check Number
57378
57378
5/378 POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC.
08-Oct-98 POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC.
07-Oct-93 POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC
Totals Check Number 57378 POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC,
Check Number 57379 RICKS SUPERVALUE
57379 08-Oct-98 RICKS SUPERVALUE
Totals Check Numbei 57379 RICKS SUPERVALUE
Check Number 57380 RITZ CAMERA
57380 07-Oct-98 RITZ CAMERA
Totals Check Number 57380 RITZ CAMERA
Check Number 57381 SENIOR COftftJNITY SERVICES
57381 07-Oct-98 SENIOR COr#<UNITY SERVICES
Totals Check Number 57381 SENIOR COmUNITY SERVICES
Check Number 57382 STREICHERS
57382
57382
57382
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
STREICHERS
STREICHERS
STREICHERS
Totals Check Number 57382 STREICHERS
Check Number 57383 STS CONSULTANTS LTD.
57383 08-Oct-98 STS CONSULTANTS LTD.
Totals Check Number 57383 STS CONSULTANTS LTD.
Check Number 57384 TOMCHECK, LARRY
57384 07-Oct-98 TOMCHBCK. LARRY
Totals Check Number 57384 TOMCHECK. LARRY
Check Number 57305 TRACY TRIPP FUELS
57385 07-Oct-98 TRACY TRIPP FUET.e
Totals Check Number 57385 TRACY TRIPP FUELS
Check Number 57386 TREADWAY GRAPHICS
57306 O7-Oct-90 TREADWAY GRAPHICS
Totals Check Number 57386 TREADWAY GRAPHICS
Transaction
Amount
1.693.35
1.755.93
3.449.28
7.04
7.04
11.70
11.70
6.810.00
6.81C.00
179.70
59.95
-15.00
224.65
682.90
682.90
635.50
635.50
1.731.09
1.731.09
28.79
28.79
Page 9
Comnents
SEPTEMBER SERVICE
JANITORIAL SERVICE
CUPS, PLANTS
PHOTO PROCESSING
SR CITIZEN SERVICES
UNIFORM
BOOTS
UNIFORM
SOIL DENSITIES
EMERG MGMT - CONFERENCE
2000.1 GALS UNLEADED
DARE SUPPLIES
8 Oct 1998
Thu 12:37 PM
Check
Number
Check Number
57387
Check Register
City of Orono
Date Name
57387 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
Q7.0ct*98 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
Totals Check Number 57387 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
Check Number 57388 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
57388 13-JU1-98 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Totel. Check Number 57388 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Check Number
57389
57389 UNIV OF MINNESOTA
07-0ct-98
Totals Check Number
UNIV OF MINNESOTA
57389 UNIV OF MINNESOTA
Check Number
57390
57390
57390
57390
57390 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE - IlFE
08-Oct-96
08-OCC-96
08-OCL-96
08-Oct-98
UNUM LIFE insurance
unum life insurance
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE
unum life INSURANCE
LIFE
LIFE
LIFE
LIFE
Totals Check Number 57390 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE - LIFE
Check Number
57391
57391 US FILTER
07-Oct-98 US FILTER
Totals Check Number 57391 US FILTER
Check Number
57392
57392
5*’*'92
57392
57392 US VfEST COfWUNICATIONS
lO-Aug-98
10-Aug-98
lO-Aug-98
lO-Aug-98
Totals Check Number
.S WEST COe^lUNICATIONS
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
US WEST COWIUNICATIONS
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
57392 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
Check Number
57393
57393
57393 VILLAGE CHEVROLET
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
Totals Check Number
VILLAGE CHEVROLET
VILLAGE CHEVROLET
57393 VILLAGE CHEVROLET
Check Number 57394 WAWUNG LITES OP MN
07-Oct-90 WARNING LITES OF MN57394
Totals Check Number 57394 WARNING LITES OF MN
Transaction
Amount
168.40
168.40
1.800.00
1.800.00
120.00
120.00
0.85
6.2d
14.67
519.15
540.95
363.98
363.98
311.37
118.45
117.49
1,134.55
1,681.86
118.90
33.27
152.17
108.95
108.95
Page 10
Comments
BELTS
POSTAGE
ONSITE SEWAGE WORKSHOPS
OCTOBER INSURANCE
OCTOBER INSURANCE
OCTOBER INSURANCE
OCTOBER INSURANCE
CURB BOX. ROD
PHONE SERVICE
PHONE SERVICE
PHONE SERVICE
PHONE SERVICE
PUMP AND SEAL ASSEMBLY
BELT
BARRICADES
i ■t '
f i
8 Oct 1990
Thu 12:37 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Date Name
Check Number
57395
57395 WEST PHOTO
07-Oct-98 WEST PHOTO
Totals Check Number 57395 WEST PHOTO
Check Number 57396 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE
57396 07-Oct-98 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE
Totals Check Number 57396 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE
Check Number 57397 WILLIAMS LAWN SERVICE
57397 07-Oct-98 WILLIAMS LAWN SERVICE
Totals Check Number 57397 WILLIAMS LAWN SERVICE
Check Number 57398 WRIGHT HQINEPIN ELECTRIC
57398
57398
09-Jun-98
09-Jun-98
WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC
WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC
Totals Check Number 57398 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC
Check Number 57399 YOUNG. JACKIE
57399 08-Oct-98 YOUNG. JACKIE
Totals Check Number 57399 YOUNG. JACKIE
Grand Total
Transaction
Amount
117.01
117.01
47.46
47.46
2.600.00
2.600.00
8.00
18.88
26.88
525.00
525.00
250.418.64
Page 11
Comments
FILM
TIRE REPAIR
PARK MOWING 8/98
ELEC SERVICE
ELEC SERVICE
PARK CC^ 9/8/98
1
i
r
28 Sep 1998
Mon 4:28 PM
Check Re^.’^ter
City of Oro.’.o
Check
Nuinber Date Name
Check Number
56S12
56512 BATTERIES PLUS
28-Sep-98 BATTERIES PLHS
Totals Check Number 56512 BATTERIES PLUS
Check Number 56513 ICMA CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
56513 28-Sep-98 ICMA CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
Totals Check Number 56513 ICMA CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
Check Number 56514 MN DEPT OF REVENUE
56514
56514
56514
28-Sep-98
28-Sep-98
28-Sep-98
MN DEPT OF REVENUE
MN DEPT OF REVENUE
mn dept of revenue
Totals Check Number 56514 MN DEPT OP REVENUE
Check Number 56515 A.T.O.M.
56515 28-Sep-98 A.T.O.M.
Totals Check Number 56515 A.T.O.M
Check Number 56516 HANSEN. STEVEN C.
56516 28-Sep-98 HANSEN, STEVEN C,
Totals Check Number 56516 HANSEN. STEVEN C
Check Number 56949 A.T.O.M.
56949 28-Sep-98 A.T.O.M
Totals Check Number 56949 A.T.O.M
Check Number 57001 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMEOT
57001 28-Sep-98 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT
Totals Check Number 57001 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT
Check Number 57021 PIONEER RIM k WHEEL CO
57021 28-Sep-98 PIONEER RIM k WHEEL CO
Totals Check Number 57021 PIONEER RIM k WHEEL CO
Grand Total
Transaction
Amount
18.10
18.10
445.00
445.00
12.00
516.00
3.146.00
3.674.00
250.00
250.00
120.81
120.81
-250.00
-250.00
-27.36
-27.36
•228.38
-228.38
4,002.17
Page 1
Comments
BATTERIES
lO^A ANNUAL CONFERENCE
JULY SALES TAX
JULY SALES TAX
JULY SALES TAX
TRAINING - ANDERSON
PICNIC SUPPLIES
TRAINING - A.NDERSON
PARTS
PARTS
1
' . . . . .. TJ . * i- - I
28 Sep 1998
Mon 4:17 PM
Page i
City of Orono
Payment Transaction Listing
Batch HC0896 Contains 10 Entries
Actual Dollars Entered are 4,002.17
User Dollar Control of 4,002.17
Posting Accounts;
Cash Account 10100
Payables Account 20200
Batch is In Balance 0.00
Entry Vendor Invoice
Final
P.O. Pay Date Account Number Amount Due Date Check 8 Check Date
!
l! 1
1 00140 056669
CASH 10100
N 28-Sep-98 N
PAYABLES 20200
E 10143000221
2 00679 157604
CASH 10100
N 28-Sep*98 N
PAYABLES 20200
E 60249450221
3 00163 SLS T 7/98
CASH 10100
N 28-Sep-98 N R 10134210
PAYABLES 20200
4 00163 SLS T 7/98
CASH 10100
N 28-Sep-98 N G 60120802
PAYABLES 20200
5 00163 SLS T 7/98
CASH 10100
N 28-Sep-98 N G 61320802
PAYABLES 20200
6 00767 MOORSE
CASH 10100
N 28-Sep-98 N
PAYABLES 20200
E 10141300437
7 00349 523
CASH 10100
N 28-Sep-98 N
PAYABLES 20200
E 10142110437
8 00349 523
CASH 10100
N 28-Sep-98 N
PAYABLES 20200
S 10142110437
9 00667 08/05/98
CASH 10100
N 28*Sep-98 N
PAYABLES 20200
E 10143000221
10 00230 08/26/98
CASH lOlCO
N 28-Sep-98 N E 10141300489
PAYABLES 20200
Total
Total
System Generated Checks
Hand Payable Checks
0.00
4002.17
Total - Combined 4002.17
-27.36
COWIEOTS PARTS
-228.38
COMMENTS PARTS
12.00
COMMENTS JULY SALES TAX
516.OC
COMMEJrrS JULY SALES TAX
3,146.00
COMMENTS JULY SALES TAX
445.00
COMMENTS ICMA ANNUAL CONFERENCE
•250.00
COMMENTS TRAINING - ANDERSON
250.00
COMMENTS TRAINING - ANDERSON
18.10
COMMENTS BATTERIES
120.81
COMMENTS PICNIC SUPPLIE^
057001 24-Aug-98
057021 24-Aug-98
056514 20-Aug-98
056514 20-Aug-98
056514 20-Aug-98
056513 20-Aug-98
056949 24-Aug-98
056515 24-Aug-98
056512 OS-Aug-98
056516 26-Aug-98
r
7 Oct 1998
Wed 0:37 AM
Ch'jck Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Employee Name
Check Number 045012
045012 JOHNSON, MARY ANN
Totals Check Number 045012
Check Number 045013
045013 GEMAR, JAMIE L.
Totals Check Number 045013
Check Number 045014
045014 HASEMAN, CAROLE A.
Totals Check Number 045014
Check Number 045015
045015 MOORSE, RONALD J.
Totals Check Number 045015
Check Number 045016
045016 VEE« LINDA S.
Totals Check Number 045016
Check Number 045017
045017 KUEHN, THOMAS M.
Totals Check Number 045017
Check Number 045010
045018 OLSON, RONALD J.
Totals Check Number 045018
Check Number 045019
045019 PETTIT, SANDRA K.
Totals Check Kumber 045019
Check Number 045020
C45020 ANDERSON, BRUCE L.
Totals Check Number 045020
Check
Date
O7-Oct-90
07-Oct-99
O7-Oct-90
07-Oct-98
O7-Oct-90
07-Oct-98
O7-Oct-90
07-Oct-98
O7-Oct-90
Page 1
Check
Amount
442.81
442.81
504.18
504.18
658.70
650.70
1,470.03
1,470.03
1,005.40
1,005.40
950.79
950.79
14.96
14.96
738.83
730.83
291.15
291.15
k
7 Oct 1998
Wed 8:37 AM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Employee Name
Check Number 045021
045021 BOBCIEN^ SUE A.
Totals Check Number 045021
Check Number 045022
045022 BORIS. SCOTT W.
Totals Check Number 045022
Check Number 045023
045023 CARLSON, MICHAEL B.
Totals Check Number 045023
Check Number 045024
045024 CHESWICK, GARY B.
Totals Check Number 045024
Check Number 045025
045025 CORNICK, JAMES L.
Totals Check Number 045025
Check Number 045026
045026 DEMBOUSKI, JAY C.
Totals Check Number 045026
Check Number 045027
045027 -..ICKSON, KURT R
Totals Check Number 045027
Check Number 045028
045028 PARNIOK, CORREY L.
Totals Check Number 045028
Check Number 045029
045029 FISCHENICH. DAN T.
Totals Check Number 045029
Check Number 045030
Check
Date
07-Oct-99
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
Check
Amount
636.38
636.38
986.28
986.28
153.67
153.67
1.577.12
1.577.12
1,161.07
1,161.07
1,162.14
1,162.14
1,250.82
1,250.82
1.092.52
1.092.52
1,144.21
1,144.21
Page 2
7 Oct 1998
Wed 8:37 AM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Employee Name
Check Number 045030
045030 FISCHER, CHRISTOPHER K.
Totals Check Number 045030
Check Number 045031
045031 HANSING, CAROL J.
Totals Check Number 045031
Check Number 045032
045032 JOHNSON, BRADLEY P.
Totals Check Number 045032
Check Number 045033
045033 KNOLLENBERG, KRISTIN L,
Totals Check Number 045033
Check Number 045034
045034 MCNALLY, STEVEN A.
Totals Check Number 045034
Check Number 045035
045035 MCNICHOLS, DAVID L.
Totals Check Number 045035
Check Number 045036
045036 NOROWCZYNSKI, JAMES
Totals Check Number 045036
Check Number 045037
045037 PERSELL, WILLIAM R.
Totals Check Number 045037
Check Number 045038
045038 SCHOENHOFF, JOHN B.
Totals Check Number 045030
Check Number 045039
Check
Date
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
Page 3
Check
Amount
1,089.93
1,089.93
332.61
332.61
1,281.74
1,281.74
684.91
684.91
995.09
995.09
832.06
@32.06
1,508.29
1,508.29
430.24
430.24
1,339.04
1,339.04
J
i i
7 Oct 1998
Wed 8:37 AM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Employee Name
Check Number 045039
045039 TOMCHECK, LAWRENCE F
Totals Check Number 045039
Check Number 045040
045040 TOMCZYK, MARK W.
Totals Check Number 045040
Check Number 045041
045041 FOLEY, PATRICK B.
Totals Check Number 045041
Check Number 045042
045042 JOHNSON, JEFFREY U.
Totals Check Number 045042
Check Number 045043
045043 WITTKE, ANTHONY A.
Totals Check Number 045043
Check Number 045U44
045044 GAFFRON, MTCHAEL P.
Totals Check Number 045044
Check Number 045045
045045 GAPPA, GREGORY A.
Totals Check Number 045045
Check Number 045046
045046 OMAN, LYLE B.
Totals Check Number 045046
Check Number 045047
045C47 VAN ZOMEREN, ELIZABETH
Totals Check Number 045047
Che:> Number 045048
Check
Date
07-oct-:;8
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
Page 4
Che*:k
Amount
338.16
338.16
1,2?5.37
1,235.37
15.08
15.08
595.31
595.31
217.09
217.09
1,117.41
1,117.41
1,424.26
1,424.26
122.15
122.15
1,112.53
1,112.53
r
I N
7 Oct 1998
Wed 6:37 AM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Employee Name
Check Number 045748
045048 VANG« BRUCE L
Tutals Check Number 045048
Check Number 045049
045049 WECKNAN, STEPHEN J
Totals Check Number 045049
Check Number 045050
045050 WEINBERGER, PAUL E.
Totals Check Number 045050
Check Number 045051
045051 BRINKHAUS, JOHN F.
Totals Check Number 045051
Check Number 045052
045052 DEBAERE« DONALD L.
Totals Check Number 045052
Check Number 045053
045053 GREGORY, JAMES D.
Totals Check Number 045053
Check Number 045054
045054 HANSEN, STEVEN C.
Totals Check Number 045054
Check Number 045055
045055 OBERAIGNER. SCOTT G.
Totals Check Number 045055
Check Number 045056
045056 OBRIEN, RANDY L.
Totals Check Number 045056
Check Number 045057
Check
Date
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
0*-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
Page 5
Check
Amount
976.33
976.33
29.68
29.68
759.06
759.06
1,055.63
1,055.63
1,025.50
1,025.50
614.97
614.97
708.06
708.06
603.67
603.67
179.95
179.95
r
7 Oct 1998
Wed 0:37 AM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Employee Name
Check Number 045057
045C57 P\LMBR, GREGORY A.
Totals Check Number 045057
Check Number 045058
045050 RATHBUN, BARRY J.
Totals Check Number 04505B
Check Number 045059
045059 SKREEN, DALE S.
Totals Check Number 045059
Check Number 045060
045060 DELANEY, JANE
Totals Check Number 045060
Check Number 045061
045061 DOCKEN, THOMAS W.
Totals Check Number 045061
Check Number 045062
045062 MCINTYRE, WILLIAM E
Totals Check Number 045062
Check Number 045063
045063 OAS, DANIEL 0
Totals Check Number 045063
Check Number 045064
045064 PETERSON, JACK W
Totals Check Number 045064
Check Number 045065
0450C^ RAICHE, VICTORIA H.
Totals Check Number 045065
Check Number 045066
Check
Date
O7-Oct-90
O7-Oct-90
O7-Oct-90
07-Oct-98
O7-Cct-90
07-0ct*98
07-Oct-98
O7-Oct-90
O7-Oct-90
Page 6
Check
Amount
941.34
941.34
996.75
996.75
625.85
625.85
38.47
30.47
439.25
439.25
143.41
143.41
186.63
186.63
303.73
303.73
t,..90
93.90
: I
I j
4
/i
7 Oct 1990
W^d 8:37 AH
Check
N.mber Employee Name
Cneck Number 045066
C45066 ROSS, JOHN A.
Totals Check Number 045066
Check Register
City of Orono
Page 7
Check
Date
07-Oct-98
Check
Amount
130.16
130.16
Check Number 045067
045067 STEFFENHAGEN, RONALD E.
Totals Check Number 045067
07-Oct-98 1,054.36
1,054.36
Check Number U45068
045068 YEAGER, DONALD C.
Totals Check Number 045068
07-Oct-98 128.93
128.93
Grand Total 40,947.96
r
I i
* t
i •
! »
7 Oct X990
Hed 9:1$ AM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Date Name
Check Number
57300
57300 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION
O7-Oct-90 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION
Totals Check Number 57300 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION
Check Number 57301 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES
57301
57301
57301
O7-Oct-90
O7-Oct-90
O7-Oct-90
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES
Totals Check Number 57301 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES
Check Number 57302 GREAT NEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO.
57302 O7-Oct-90 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO,
Totals Check Number 57302 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO,
Check Number 57303 HENNEPIN CO. SUPPORT k COLL
57303 O7-Oct-90 HENNEPIN CO. SUPPORT k COLL
Totals Check Number 57303 HENNEPIN CO. SUPPORT k COLL
Check Number 57304 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT k COLL
57304 O7-Oct-90 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT k COLL
Totals Check Number 57304 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT k COLL
Check Number 57305 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457
57305 O7-Oct-90 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457
Totals Qieck Number 57305 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457
Check Number 5730$ LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE
5730$O7-Oct-90 LAW ENFORCMQIT LABOR SERVICE
Totals Check Number 57306 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE
Check Number 57307 MN DEPT OF REVENUE
57307 O7-Oct-90 MN DEPT OF REVENUE
Totals Check Number 57307 MN DEPT OF REVENUE
Check Number 57300 MN MUTUAL LIFE
57300 O7-Oct-90 MN MUTUAL LIFE
Totals Check Number 573C8 MN MUTUAL LIFE
Transaction
Amount
7,409.00
7,409.00
3.301.01
3.301.01
7.705.1$
14.540.70
950.$0
950.60
0.00
0.00
179.51
179.51
225.00
225.00
0.00
m m m m
0.00
3.366.00
J.366.00
745.30
745.30
Page 1
Comments
SAVINGS W/H k TRANSFERRED
FICA k MEDICARE W/H
FICA.MEDCR CITY SHARE
FEDERAL WITHHOLDING
DEFERRED COMP W/H
THOMTON #CO26670O
SKREEN #0010755723
DEFERRED COMP W/H
UNION DUES WH
STATE TAX W/H
DEFERRED COMP W/H
7 Oct 1998
Hed 9:16 AM
Check
Humber
Check Humber
57309
Check Register
City of Orono
Date Name
57309 MH STA-re RETIREMENT-DEF COMP
07-Oct-98 MN STATE RETIREMENT-DEF COMP
Totals Check Humber 57309 MN STATE RETIREMENT-DEF COMP
Check Number
57310
57310 PEBSCO/OBRA
07-Oct-98
Totals Check Humber
PEBSCO/OBRA
57310 PEBSCO/OBRA
Check Humber
57311
57311 PBBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS
07-Oct-98
Totals Check Number
PBBSCO/US CONP OF MAYORS
57311 PEBSCO/US COfT OP MAYORS
Check Humber
57312
57312
57312 PERA
07-Oct-98
07-Oct-98
Totals Check Number
PERA
PERA
57312 PERA
Check Number
57313
57313 UNITED WAY
07-Oct-98
Totals Check Number
UNITED WAY
57313 UNITED WAY
Transaction
Amount
227.00
227.00
243.50
243.50
2.254.35
2.254.35
4,379.62
5,747.17
10,126.79
30.00
30.00
Page 2
Comments
DEFERRED COMP W/H
OBRA DEFERRED COMP W/H
USCM DEFERRED COMP W/H
PERA EMPLOYEE W/H
PERA CITY SHARE
CHARITY DONATIONS W/H
Grand Total 40.305.99
j
INFORMATION
ITEMS
COUNCIL MEETING
COUNCLMEEnNQ
DCT 1 2 M98
CUVOPC.'tONO
OF
r-C OUr<
OCT .1 2 1998
cm' or- onovo
OCTOBER MEETING CANCELED
''I'MZD
n ■; 1998
0* • • • -»'■»Ci\'0
The October meeting is canceled due to not having the construction limits complete.
Our tentative schedule is as follows:
Construction limits and layout complete in three weeks. We will mail the layout to the
cities to begin the layout approval process. The cities will have up to 120 days to express
their approval or disapproval. I will also send a copy to the members of the TH 12 DRC,
which will allow you time to review before the next meeting and come prepared with
comments.
The public hearing will be scheduled sometime between 90 and 120 days from the date of
the layout submittal to the cities and may be earlier at the city ’s request. We thought
maybe in December or January, depending on how the review process goes and how
many issues need to be resolved.
I
The EA will is near completion, still working on the 4(0 section and finalizing the figures
and tables. I anticipate sending it out for Mn/DOT and FHWA review in two weeks. I
have been told it will take about one month for the internal review. After those
comments come back we will make any changes and then submit the EA to the cities.
The EA has to be submitted to the cities 15 days prior to the public hearing. The timing
should work well with the layout review process.
I want to thank everyone for their time and input provided to this committee. It says a lot
about your commitment to your communities and the environment. I will see you at the
next meeting scheduled for:
November 4,1998
Orono City Hall
5:30 to 7:30 pm
r
TH 12 Design l^eview Committee
September 2,1998
5:30-7:30
Orono City Hall
Attendees:
Mike Johnson
Nancy Yoo
David Larson
Ray Cekalla
Bruce Polaczyk
Lilly McMillan
Chris Morrison
Dave Dudinsky
Richard Peterson
Carol Schmidt
Mike H-—
Jim Murphy
Diann Goetten
Rose Richter
Elmer Pladers
Tom OKeefe
ITEM:
ITEM;
Tom called meeting to order at 5:35 p.m.
Project Update
when fimshed up will require an mtemal review, then we will submit to the cities.
Tom went over the process of the project:
1.
2.
Mn/DOT will submit layout to the cities (Oct. 1)
Between 90-120 days after the layout is submitted, a public hearing
is held. The cities may request the public hearing within a shorter
time frame.
3.
4.
5.
Mn/DOT receives comments from cities and has 180 days to revise
and formally adopt the layout. It is not anticipated to take 180
days for Mi/DOT final review and revisions
Laj out is sent out to the cities and agencies for final approval
Agencies have 120 days to approve or disapprove.
approved, it goes to final design. If it is not approved,
Mn/DOT can modify it again and agencies have 60 days to
approve/disapprove or the layout can go to an appeal board.
ITEM: Pedestrian Bridge and Trails
Looked at the plans for trails along the whole corridor. Two different options
one that runs aLng the existing railroad embankment and connects with Green
Glen P^k and the Luce Line Trail, and the alternative north of Co. Rd. 6 running
Questions asked from the group:
AL
r
11
TH 12 Meeting
9-2-98
Page 2
Q. Is the pedestrian bridge at current railroad grade or higher than current
railroad grade.
A. We will have to build it up by approximately 9 feet.
Q.
A.
What is the possibility of a 2"^ crossing near the Wolf property.
Tom assured them that the area they were concerned about almost
certainly would not be used for a 2"^ crossing.
Q.
A.
Did Long Lake City Council look at the pedestrian crossing and bike
trails?
Tom answered, Yes. If the townhouses weren ’t there the bike trails would
go straight.
ITEM:Construction Staging
Tom went through the possible construction staging and pointed out on the layouts.
Also pointing out that the railroad can only be closed for a couple of hours, so building as
much of the RR grade embankment as possible is necessary. See attached possible
staging.
NEXT MEETING CANCELED
October 7,1998
5:30 PM
Orono City Hall
Recorder: Carol Slipy
♦ «
S.P. 2713-75 (TH 12)
PAGE I
POSSIBLE STAGING 9-2-98
RDR
YEAR I SI 9,500.000
PERMANENT CLOSURE - MAY ST AND WATERTOWN RD
TEMPORARY CLOSURE - WILLOW DR
I. MOVE LIFT STATION NEAR FLEMING POND
2. CONSTRUCT SOUTHERN RETAINING WALLS
3.RAILROAD GRADING. EXCLUDING:
- RAILROAD CONNECTIONS TO INPLACE RAILROAD
• BROWN RD
- OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD
4. CONSTRUCT SOUTH FRONTAGE RD
5. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY WILLOW DR AND BRIDGE
6. RECONSTRUCT LUCE LINE BRIDGES AT NEW 12 AND INPLACE 12
7. BEGIN CONSTRUCTION OF BROWN RD AND BRIDGE
8. CONSTRUCT PROPOSED PARK AND RIDE LOT AND RELOCATED LONG LAKE CITY HALL
YEAR 2 $7,000,000
TEMPORARY CLOSURE - OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD, BROWN RD, AND LAKE ST
1. RAILROAD GRADING AT OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD AND BROWN RD
2. RAILROAD TRACK CONSTRUCTION, EXCLUDING WEST AND EAST RAILROAD CONNECTIONS
3. railroad GRAOrNG AND TRACK. CONSTRUCTION AT WEST AND EAST RAILROAD CONNECTIONS
4. MOVE RAILROAD
5. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY RAILROAD CROSSING EAST OF BROWN RD
6. RECONSTRUCT IN PLACE 12 AT BROWN RD
7. COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION OF BROWN RD AND BRIDGE
r
i
i
S.P. 2713-75 (TH 12)
PAGE 2
POSSIBLE STAGING
4 • *
9-2-98
RDR
YEAR 2 (CONT)
8. RECONSTRUCT OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD AND BRIDGE
9. CONSTRUCT CONNECTION FROM LAKE ST TO DANIELS ST
RE-OPEN OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD, BROWN RD. AND LAKE ST
REMOVE TEMPORARY RAILROAD CROSSING
YEAR 3 $2I.000,ooa
I
TEMPORARY CLOSURE - WILLOW DR
I. CONSTRUCT NORTHERN RETAINING WALLS
2. CONSTRUCT NEW 12, EXCLUDING CONNECTIONS TO INP 12
3. RECONSTRUCT WILLOW DR AND BRIDGE
4. CONSTRUCTION ALONG INP 12 - MAY ST TO GLENMOOR LN
5. CONSTRUCT BRIDGE FROM EB INP 12 TO EB NEW 12 IN WAYZATA
6. CONSTRUCT ROADWAY FROM INP 12 TO NEW CO RD 6 IN ORONO
7. CONSTRUCT RAMP AND LOOP FOR NEW INTERCHANGE IN ORONO
8. RECONSTRUCT CO RD 6
REOPEN WILLOW DR
YEAR 4 $6.500,(
1. COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION OF WEST CONNECTION AND CO RD 6
2. CONSTRUCT EAST CONNECTION AND WAYZATA BLVD
3. CONSTRUCT PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE IN LONG LAKE
4. MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL S54.000.000
LMCC
DEEPHAVEN
EXCELSIOR
GREENWOOD
LONG LAKE
MINNETRISTA
ORONO
ST. iONIFACIUS
SHOREWOOO
SPRING PARK
TONKA BAY
VICTORIA
WOODLAND
;?2°47««0■
COUNCIL •
OCT 1 2 1^98
CITY r.iOctober 5, 1998
Mayor Gabriel Jabbour and City Council Members
City of Orono
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Dear Mayor Jabbour and Council Members:
The Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission (LMCC) passed the enclosed
budget figures for 1999, at its full LMCC meeting on September 22, 1998.
RSCSiVED
OCT 0 6 1998
Ci l Y UH OriCiN’O
MEDINA . ^ ^ we have scheduled a timed item on your city council agenda, which is set
for October 26,1998 at 8:00pm, to talk for a few minutes about the LMCC budget and
MINNETONKA cuiTent/future challenges. At that time, any questions you may have regarding the LMCC
BEACH future plans or an explanation of any budget figures can be explained.
As always, we look forward to appearing before you, to talk about the achievements of
your Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission.
Sincerely,
Lake^imetonka Communications Commission
i^in Thies
Administrator
Enclosure
cc T. Pattrin, LMCC Chair
^ederick Blanch, Commissioner
v^on Morse, City of Orono
Franchise Fees
Odicr
TriaX'Nordi Studio
Aoces Support - PEG Fee
Interest
Contingency Fund
(only if needed)
Administrator, Access &
Office Staff
Secretarial Service
Pl^rdl Taxes/PERA
Travd Expenses
Health Insurance
Legal Fees
Insuranoe/Bonds
LMCC Aoeounting/
Annual Review
Conf, Schools &
Conventions
Offioc/Studio Supply Janitor
Serv/Supply
Membership Dues/
LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSIONPROPOSED 1999 BUDGET APPROVED BY LMCC 9-22-98Proposed Budget for 1999 Ba^et for 1998 Change %ChangeINCe>ME$160,000.00
0.00
52,200.00
4,000.00
$216,200.00
$155,702.69
$176,262.69
+ $4,297.31
-(2000.00)
52,200.00
0.00
39,937.31
OPERATING EXPENSES
4,000.00
1,500.00
4,000.00
1,500.00
0.00
0.00
23%
QES
0%
0%
=> Payroll for Admin., Prod. Coord., Studio Coord.,
PT Prod. Asst.’s A Admin. Asst
=> Payroll Services
PERA A employer w/holding contribution
LMCC visibility at all cities, MACTA, North Studio A
errands
=> Amt. attributed to employee healdi ins.
=> Rate reg^fiandiise renewal/l^al counsel
=> Workers Comp., Dishonesty Bond, Property Liability
^ Bookkeeping A annual audit
=> NATOA, MACTA, NFLCP
=> Normal office/studio supplies, copy madiine agree-
moit & janitor service and supplies
=> NATOA, MACTA, magazines and 4 local
i n V -■ -1
!'»»» Ml- »
PAGE 2LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION PROPOSED 1999 BUDGET - CONTINUEDPropeaedBudgetChangeBudgetfor 1998for 1999.' » • I» »i •^oioe
Postage^ Box
ffiaoeUimeous
Adv«rtiiifig/Promo
Four Quarterly
Newdetten
Office Equipment
Office Rent
Equipment Maint
ftRepair
Sales Tax
OPERATING
SUB-TOTAL
OPERATING EXPENSES (continued)$ 2330.00
0.00
11.500.00
20.700.00
LOOOJIO
fl7«,(
$ 2,330.00
LOOO.OO
$151,862.69
+ $0.00
$26,737.31
Liaangc0%
18%
DESCRIPTIONMonthly diarges/answering service
LMCC agendas/correspondence, ft PO Box Rental
Varies
Four quarterly newsletters to all intoested cities,
direct mail promos, Triax bill stufTers, Annual
Ch. 21 Awards, wd> page, etc.
Office Rent ft Bank Box
Now responsible for gli equipment, (including former
Triax equipment).
Based on 6.5% of taxable purchases
'^*41
Capital Funds
Fnmchiae Renewal
Find
Tape Stock
Technical/Financial
Rate Audit
Studio Equipment
Legal Fund
Office Equipment
Access Equipment
Aooesa/Development
Contingenqf
Sales Tax
SreCIAL FUNDS
SUB-TOTAL
OPERATING
FUNDS
SUB-TOTAL
GRAND TOTAL
PAGE 3LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
PROPOSED 1999 BUDGET - CONTINUED
Fnposed Budget Change %
Budget for 1998 Change
far 1999
SPECIAL FUNDS
0.00
1,000.00
400.00
2,500.00
5,000.00
500.00
3.500.00
12.500.00
11,000.00
200.00
1.000.00
$37,(
$178,600.00
$216,200.00
0.00
1,500.00
300.00
2,500.00
2,500.00
100.00
1,000.00
5,000.00
11,000.00
0.00
500.00
$ 24,400.00
$151,862.69
$17632.69
0.00
(-500.00)
0.00
0.00
2,500.00
400.00
+500.00
0.00
0.00
200.00
500.00
13,200.00
$26737.31
+ $39,937.31
0%
0%
0%
0%
1
400%
250%
150%
200%
100%
54%
18%
DgS
Expenses involved in follow-up on renewal.
Replacement of videotape for production
Future audit if needed
Replace studio hardware, less portable equipment
Future unforeseen legal expenses
Replace / purchase new office equipment
=> Cameras, porta-pack, misc. for more
city council meetings, community programming.
Coverage of dty council mtgs., film development DeWolf
Audio, playback fiKilities, capital expenditures.
Based on 6.5% of taxable purchases
23%
Budgat9^pub
' ?■
\
J