Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
07-27-1998 Council Packet
r : f Public A ttendance Meeting D ate 7. a 7- ? y □□ C ouncil Planning C ommission Park C ommission Other Ple^ fill oirre the information lEQUESra. BEI^wmoU^ NAME (please print) 5.. 6. 7.. 8. 9. 10.. 11. 12.. 13.. 14. 15.. 0UfM ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MOND AY, JULY 27,1998,7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA ► (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet - located on the counter near the sign in sheet. COUNCIL MEETING ROLL CALL CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approve/Amend JUL 2 7 1998 CHYOF ORONO 7:00 p,nu 2. Presentation by Auditor Regarding Annual Comprehensive Financial Report 7:30 p,nt 3. Kelly Cove Joint Use Dock License - Scheduled Public Hearing APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 4. RegrilarMeetingof July 13,1998 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT - Lili McMillan, Representative PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Dale Lindquist, Representative PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT C U 5. #2340 Robert Waade, 3280/3290 North Shore Drive - Final Plat Approval - Resolution 6. #2368 Kirk Otteson, 710 North Arm Drive ' Variances - Resolution 7. #2370 Gary O Keefe, 1392 Baldur Park Road - Variances/Conditional Use Permit - Resolution 8. #2381 BusseConstructiononbehalfof James Johnson and Charles Larson, 4300 Watertown Road and 4285 Sixth Avenue North - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution T 9. #2382 Busse Construction on behalf of Tim Otten, 425 Tumham Road - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution V 10. #2386 Busse Construction on behalf of Katherine Colgrove, 4260 Sixth Avenue North - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution ^11. #2387 Busse Construction on behalf of Bob Gehrman, 4300 Sixth Avenue - Conditional Use Permit- Resolution V 12. #2385 Stephanie Kroeger, 3465 Crystal Place - Variances - Resolution 13. #2390 David Rahn, 1385 Rest Point Read - Variances ^-PgrinHVffsolution V 14. #2392 Thomas Berscheid, 1365 Rest Point Road - Varraroes - Resolution ^ 15. #2396 Clint and Jodi Morrison, 3510 Bayside Road - Variances - Resolution 16. #2397 Joe & I eslie Lucas, 1060 Brown Road North - Variances - Resolution AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JULY 27,1998,7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT ENGINEER REPORT CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 17. Public Works Regional llfutual Aid Association - Resolution 18. Mn/DOT Limited Use Permit for TH12 Crossing by Old Crystal Bay Road Trail - Resolution 19. Preliminary Review of Industrial Zoning District - Draft Amendment 20. NoiseA^ibration Study for Highway 12 21. Work Plan for Comprehensive Plan Update 22. Selection of Date(s) for Joint Work Session with Long Lake City Council CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT « 23. UCENSES * 24. BILLS UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 1228 07/27 - Coimcil Meeting, 7:00 p.m, 08/05 - Park Commission Meeting, 7:15 p.m. 08/05 - Highway 12 Design Review Committee, 5:30 p.m. 08/10 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 08/17 - Planning Commission Meeting, 6:30 p.m. 08/24 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 08/25 - Filing Opens for Candidates for City OfiBces 09/02 - Highway 12 Design Review Committee, 5:30 p.m. 09/07 - LABOR DAY HOLIDAY 09/08 - Park Commission Meeting, 6:30 p.m. 09/08 - Filing Closes for Candidates for City Offices 09/14 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 09/15 - PRIMARY ELECTION, 7:00 ajn. - 8:00 p.m. 09/21 - Planning Commission Meeting, 6:30 p.m. 09/28 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. COUNCIL MEETING JUL 2 7 1998 cmroFORONo REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE; July 24,1998 ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: Item Descriplion; Presentation Regarding the 1997 Annual Comprehensive Financial Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Ken Malloy of Malloy, Montague, Kamowski, Radosevich and Company, the firm that conducted t w Ae -'“3 of the audit and COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: No action required. 1 ^ City of Orono, Minnesota Hennepin County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Year Ended December 31,1997 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK A-1 16-19 A-2 20-21 A-3 22-23 A-4 24 A-5 25 26-48 49 B-1 50 B-2 51-55 56 C-l 57 C-2 58 C-3 59 C-4 60 C-5 61 CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Table of Contents (continued) Exhibit Page ■ 1 W ! » COMBINING AND INDIVIDUAL FUND STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) Drug and Felony Forfeiture Fund Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual (GAA’’ lasis) Debt Service Funds Combining Balance Sheet Combining Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Capital Project Funds Combining Balance Sheet Combining Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes ’a Fund Balance Enterprise Funds Combining Balance Sheet Combining Statement of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings Combining Statement of Cash Flows Water Operating Fund Comparative Balance Sheet Comparative Statement of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings Comparative Statement of Cash Flows Sewer Operating Fund Comparative Balance Sheet Comparative Statement of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings Comparative Statement of Cash Flows Golf Course Operating Fund Comparative Balance Sheet Comparative Statement of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings Comparative Statement of Cash Flows Trust and Agency Funds Combining Balance Sheet Flexible Benefit Plan Expendable Trust Fund Comparative Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Agency Funds Combining Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities C-6 62 63 D-I 64-65 D-2 66-67 68 E-1 69-70 E-2 71-72 73 F-1 74-75 F-2 76-77 F-3 78-79 F-4 80-81 F-5 82 F-6 83 F-7 84-85 F-8 86 F-9 87-83 F-10 89 F-11 90 F-12 91 92 G-1 93 G-2 94 G-3 95-96 vj's , CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA> ♦ i ! Comprehensive Annual Financial ReportTable of Contents (continued) FINANCIAL SCHEDULES Comparative Schedule of General Fixed Assets by Source Schedule of General Fixed Assets by Function and Activity Schedule of Changes in General Fixed Assets by Function and Activity Future Property Tax Levies to Retire Bonds Schedule Page Table 1 ’• » STATISTICAL SECTION (UNAUDITED) General Re venue by Source General Expenditures by Function Property Tax Levies and Collections Assessed Value or Tax Capacity and Estimated Market Value of Taxable Property Property Tax Rates - Direct and Overlapping Governments Special Assessments Levies and Collections Computation of Legal Debt Margin Rotio of Net General Bonded Debt to Assessed Value or Tax Capacity and Net Bonded Debt Per Capita Ratio of Annual Debt Service Expenditures for General Bonded Debt to Total General Expenditures Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt Revenue Bond Coverage - Enterprise Funds Demographic Statistics Property Value, Construction, and Bank Deposits Principal Taxpayers Miscellaneous Statistics Tax Capacity, Tax Levies, and Tax Extension Rates OTHER REQUIRED REPORTS Independent Auditor ’s Report on Compliance and on Internal Control over Financial Reporting Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance With Government Auditing Standards Independent Auditor ’s Report on Compliance With Minnesota State Laws and Regulations Schedule of Findings and Recommendations 8 101 - 102 103 - 104 105 - 106 107 - 108 109-110 111 - 112 113 114-115 124 125 126-127 -i. 1 - \ i I 4 4 I 4 • • • introductory Section r F>I ' ■ ! i !• hi ll CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL AND OTHER OFnaALS Year Ended December 31,1997 .1- Term of Office From To City Council n Gabriel Jabbour Mayor 1/1/97 12/31/98 J. Diaim Goetten Councilmember 1/1/95 12/31/98 1 1 u.Richard Flint Councilmember 1/1/97 12/31/98 Charles Kelley Councilmember 1/1/97 12/31/00 •Barbara Peterson Councilmember 1/1/97 12/31/00 -City Officials Ronald J. Moorse City Administrator n• Thomas M. Kuehn Finance Director - Treasurer f "o Dorothy M. Hallin City Clerk THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK T ■i ] CITY OF ORONO ORGANIZATIONAL CHART ^ > " I I ♦ !• li i -2- r THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK /■aOa. A! w A .. > May 15, 1998 GITYof ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 0066 To the City Council and Citizens of the City of Orono ♦ • • t « The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the City of Orono for the fiscal year ending December 31 1997 IS hereby submitted. Responsibility for both the accuracy of the data, and the completeness and fairness of the presentation, including all disclosures, rests with the City. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the enclosed data is accurate in all material respects and is reported in a manner designed to present fairly the financial position and results of operations of the various funds and account groups of the City. All disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain an understanding of the City ’s financial activities have been included. The Comprehensive Annt^l Financial Report is presented in four sections; Introductory, Financial, Statistical, and Other Required Reports. The Introductory Section includes this transmittal letter, the City ’s organizational chart, a list of principal officials, and a copy of the GFOA Certificate of Achievement Award for the City ’s 1996 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. The Financial Section includes the general purpose financial statements, the combining and individual fund statements, financial schedules, and the Independent Auditor’s Report on the general purpose financial statements. The Statistical Section includes selected financial and demographic information, generally presented on a multi-year basis. The Other Required Reports Section contains various Independent Auditor’s report letters on internal control and legal compliance. All City funds and account ^oups, depanments, commissions, and other organizations for which the Mayor and City Council of the City of Orono are financially accountable are presented in the City of Orono’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Included within the reporting entity is the Orono Housing and Redevelopment Authority, whose board is comprised of the mayor and council members. There are no other organizations that when considered would be included in the general purpose financial statements. City provides a variety of municipal services. These include police protection, street maintenance, building inspection, planning and zoning, public improvements, general administrative services, public water and sewer utilities, and a municipal golf course. The City contracts for fire protection from the neighboring cities of Long Lake, Wayzata, Mound, and Maple Plain; and the City provides police protection to the cities of Long Lake, Spring Park, and Minnetonka Beach. The City also provides building inspection and/or animal control services to these cities. 1 * -3- Tdephooe (612) 473-7357 • FAX 4734)510 To the City Council and Citizens of the City of Orono May 15, 1998 Economic C ondition and Outlook The City of Orono was incorporated effective January 1, 1955. The City is located on the northern shore of Lake Mirmetonka about 15 miles west of Minneapolis. Of the City ’s 24.5 square miles of area, 50% is open water or marshland (with a total of 12.3 square miles of land area). Of Lake Minnetonka, 40% of the shoreline and 33% of the lake area is in Orono. The City of Orono is a third ring suburb in the seven-county metropolitan Twin Cities area of Minneapolis/St. Paul, and is located on Lake Minnetonka, the tenth largest and most heavily used recreational lake in Minnesota. Orono developed primarily because of this aesthetic amenity. This heavy use is a result of the quality of the lake’s aesthetic appeal, together with its proximity to the metropolitan urban core. The City is primarily a residential community with a mixture of several types of housing, and includes a small commercial district. Orono totally surrounds two communities, which are part of the original township, and substantially surrounds a third community. As indicated earlier, Orono cooperates with these cities for the most cost effective provision of City services. Orono is home to many of the metropolitan area’s top executives who appreciate the commrmity’s natural amenities. It is anticipated that the positive appeal of the community, together with the extent of available land, will see the conununity experiencing continued development for the next ten years. The City is in a strong financial position. Because of its strong residential tax base, Orono continued in 1997 to have a tax capacity rate that is one of the lowest in the county for communities over 1,000 in population, ranking third lowest of 41 communities. The strength of the City ’s financial condition is reflected in its bond rating of Aal since 1989. In 1997, residential construction continued at a very strong level. Building permit and plan review fees significantly exceeded expected levels. The much greater certainty concerning the Hignway 12 corridor location, along with the strong economy, generated substantial residential development activity. Redevelopment projects in the Navarre commercial area continue to move forward. The redevelopment began with Culvers restaurant and convenience store/service station. This project is complete. The City has now approved a proposal for a bank/office/commercial building on a site adjacent to the Culvers site. It is anticipated these projects will serve as a catalyst for additional redevelopment in the Navarre area. C ooperative Efforts With Other Jurisdictions The City continues to pursue opportunities for reducing the cost of City services. In 1992, Orono joined with three other cities for the provision of prosecution services. This arrangement reduced the City ’s annual prosecution costs from a three-year average of approximately $100,000 to an annual fixed fee of $30,000 through 1994, $31,823 for 1995, and $35,880 for 1996. In 1997, the City was able to hold the prosecution fee increase to $36,956, or 3% over 1996. As indicated earlier, the City is involved in cooperative arrangements for both police and fire service. The City of Long Lake provides fire service to the majority of Orono. The City of Orono provides police services to Long Lake. In 1993, the two cities were able to agree to three-year contracts for both the police and fire services. This has increased the stability of this cooperative arrangement between the two cities. -4- To the City Council and Citizens of the City of Orono May 15. 1998 The City Council has given conceptual approval to a joint project with Hennepin Parks to construct a bike/hike trail on Old Ciystal Bay Road connecting two regional park facilities - the Luce Line Trail and Baker Park. This trail will also serve the new City facilities and the Orono school campus. Funding for the trail is to be shared between the City and Hennepin Parks. A substantial portion of the trail was completed in 1997. The remainder is to be completed in 1998. In response to the purchase of a residential lakeshore property by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) for a proposed public boat launch, Orono took action to cause the DNR to rethink its procedures related to the provision of public access. Orono urged the DNR to take a wider and longer range view of this issue to prevent a piecemeal approach to the provision of public access. In response, the DNR stopped all activity related to the initial site and has purchased an existing marina for conversion to a public boat launch. This new facility, completed in 1997, provides for public access needs without expanding commercial uses on the lake and without forcing public boat launching facilities into the City ’s residential areas. This was an outstanding example of a cooperative effort between two governmental jurisdictions to find a mutually beneficial solution to a difficult problem. Orono has worked in a cooperative effort with the cities of Long Uke and Medina and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to accomplish a major water quality improvement project on Long Lake, a lake contiguous to both the cities of Long Lake and Orono. This project was funded by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. A School Liaison Officer Program was initiated through a cooperative agreement with the school district. Through this program a police officer works with school administrative and counseling staff, and builds positive relationships with the students, to enable them to assist in addressing and preventing problems, and to assist in intervening with "at risk" students. This program is fully funded by the school district. The City is currently involved with a group of 14 cities located adjacent to Lake Minnetonka in an effort to identify new opportunities for cooperative service delivery to enable improved services and increased efficiency. « « * • I ( ) t Water and Sewer Fund Operations The City continued its program to reduce the amount of ground water and stormwater entering the sanitary sewer system, with the purpose of reducing sewage treatment costs. The program includes inspection of manholes, lift stations, and sewer lines to identify significant sources of infiltration and inflow (I & I), then sealing the manholes and lift stations, and repairing the sewer lines to eliminate the I & I. In 1996, the City completed the inspection, sealing, and repair of sanitary sewer facilities in the initial project area. In 1997, the City received a $ 10,000 grant from the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services to inspect a second project area and a $ 17,000 loan to assist in funding the sealing and repairs needed in this area. These efforts will result in substantial reductions in I & I, as well as reductions in the related sewage treatment costs. The savings generated by these efforts will then be put toward addressing I & I problems in another project area. This program will be ongoing. The City has now been awarded a second grant and loan for additional I & I reduction efforts in 1998. The City is planning a multi-year rehabilitation of the Navarre water plant. This project will address maintenance and repair needs while upgrading the plant to meet projected water supply needs. The rehabilitation plan will be guided by a comprehensive analysis of the water plant performed by the City ’s consulting engineer. -5- To the City Council and Citizens of the City of Orono May 15. 1998 Storm Water Management Planning In 1996, the City Council authorized the development of a surface water management plan for the City. The plan will clarify city objectives and policies regarding surface water management. This plan will provide solutions to existing storm water problem areas, which will enable the City to be proactive in planning surface water management facilities. The surface water management needs of the City can be met as cost effectively as possible with the implementation of this plan. The City should be able to identify funding needs and funding sources well in advance of the projects which will be identified in the plan. Labor Relations Labor relations are continuing on a positive path. The police officers have agreed to a two-year contract for 1997 and 1998 with wage increases of 3% in both years. Park Planning The City continued efforts toward developing a parks and open space master plan. The City Council has adopted a resolution indicating the City will be more proactive in acquiring land for parks and open space to enable land to be acquired in advance of development, and to be acquired as cost-effectively as possible. HiGifWAY 12 Corridor The major east/west transportation route in Orono is State Highway 12. Orono and the other cities along the Highway 12 corridor have been involved in a process with Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) since the late 1980’s to determine a corridor for the upgrade of Highway 12 to address safety and transportation needs. A proposed corridor location has now been approved by all of the affected cities and by Mn/DOT, subject to the completion of an environmental assessment which is to be completed by the end of 1998. The proposed corridor addresses the major concerns of the affected cities. Land U se Planning The City is preparing to update its Comprehensive Plan. The City Council has indicated the overall vision Md philosophy regarding the development of the City will not change. The City will continue to develop in a way that protects Lake Minnetonka and preserves the City’s natural open rural character. The City has completed a land use study of the Highway 12 area, which includes the City’s prime undeveloped commercial property. The purpose of the smdy was to clarify the City’s vision for the types and character of development in the area. This study and subsequent follow-up review have enabled the City to manage the upsurge in development proposals related to this area to ensure the development does not conflict with the City’s vision for the area. -6- Amount %of Total Amount %of Total $ 1,687,266 45.3%$ 1,641,943 47.3% 44 -20 * 248,075 6.7 207,277 5.9 504,308 13.5 454,660 13.1 1,048,514 28.2 976,891 28.1 83,396 2.2 71,556 2.1 77,438 2.1 68,449 2.0 73.924 2.0 51.944 1.5 $ 3,722.965 100.0%$ 3.472.740 100% 1997 1996 Function Amount %of Total Amount %of Total Current and capital outlay General government $ 764,875 22.6%$ 719,153 21.1% Public safety 1,936,013 57.2 1,739,605 51.0 Streets 469,012 13.8 468,892 13.7 Parks and recreation 50,285 1.5 51,142 1.5 Recycling 68,773 2.0 68,634 2.0 Miscellaneous 97,590 2.9 365,529 10.7 $ 3,386,548 100.0%$ 3,412,955 100% To the City Council and Citizens of the City of Orono May !5, 1998 • « Building C apital Outlay Fund The Building Capital Outlay Fund was established to receive annual budgeted transfers from the General Fund for the purpose of reducing the need for future bonding of non-Enterprise building facilities. ® The 1991 Public Facilities Capital Project Fund received several advances from the Building Capital Outlay Fund. As an offset to these transfers, proceeds from land sold to reduce the project costs were deposited in the Building Capital Outlay Fund. The City Council has determined that investment earnings of the Building Capital Outlay Fund will be used to partially pay the debt ser^ -e of the 1991 Public Facilities Revenue Bonds and sets the amount to be transferred out annually through the budget. The fund balance as of December 31, 1997 was $2,486,116. Drug and Felony Forfeiture Fund The Drug and Felony Forfeiture Fund was established to account for proceeds received as a result of cash and property seized relating to drug and felony type criminal activity, donations received specifically for the police department, other revenues as may be appropriate or authorized by the City Council, and all authorized related expenditures. The fund balance as of December 31, 1997 was $ 10,975. Debt Service Funds Debt Service Funds are used to account for the current year payment of matured principal and interest on long-term general bonded debt. Sources available for payment of the debt service are primarily provided by special assessments and property taxes. balance for all Debt Service Funds as of December 31.1997 was $ 1,867,604, an increase ?oQ7 T increase to fund balance was primarily a result of the creation of the 1997 Improvement Bonds Fund, with prepaid special assessments and bond proceeds, which resulted in a fund balance at December 31, 1997 of $261,564. • i • C apital Project Funds Capital Project Funds are used to account for financial resources to be used for the acquisition construction of major capital facilities. Minnesota Statf -aid Streets C onstruction Fund The Minnesota State-Aid Streets Construction Fund is used to account for state-aid construction revenue and the use of that revenue for improvements to thoroughfare roads and bridges within the City. The deficit fund balance was reduced from $105,713 at December 31, 1996 to $8 962 as of December 31, 1997. The remaining deficit fund balance will be eliminated through future reimbursements of project costs from state-aid construction revenues or transfers from other funds. t « -9- To the City Council and Citizens of the City of Orono May 15, 1998 Permanent Improvement REvoi.viNn FirNn The Permanent Improvement Revolving Fimd provides financing for construction costs prior to obtaining permanent financing or levying of assessments against benefitted properties for those projects fimded directly. Within this fond there is also an account for major road and bridge repairs, construction, or maintenance. The fond balance as of December 31,1997 was $551,388, an increase of $12,076 from 1996. 1997 Sewer Construction Fund The 1997 Sewer Construction Fund was created to account for the bond proceeds from the 1997 Improvement Bonds and the costs of construction of the 1997 North Long Lake and Long Lake Country Club sanitary sewer improvements. Bay Ridge/Hartwood and Brackett’s Point sanitary sewer improvements, and the Orono Ice Arena sanitary sewer and water improvements projects. The fond balance as of December 31,1997 was $181,885. Enterprise Funds Enterprise Funds are u<;ed to account for the operations of self-supporting activities which render services or goods to the public. The accounting records are maintained on the accrual basis of accoimting. Water O perating Fund The Water Operating Fund accounts for the provision of water services to the residents of the City who have water service available. All activities necessary to provide such services are accounted for in this fimd, including administration, operations, maintenance, billing, and collection. The summary of operations for 1997 and 1996 is as follows: December 31 1997 1996 Operating revenue Operating expenses $ 220,622 $ 251,538 243.289 250,184 Operating income (loss) $ (22,667) $ 1,354 The 1997 operating revenue decreased $30,916 from 1996. This was due in part to a wetter than normal sununer and significant reductions in consumption from several large users. Tlie operating loss for 1997 does not include nonoperattng revenues of $130,458 or nonoperating expenses of $27,412. The operating income for 1996 also does not include nonoperating revenue and transfers in of $188,438 or nonoperating expenses of $42,278. Retained earnings as of December 31, 1997 were $449,903 which represents an increase of $113,265 from 1996, net of the effects of depreciation on contributed assets and nonoperating items. -10- » « ii To the City Council and Citizens of the City of Orono May 15, 1998 Sewer Operating Fund The Sewer Operating Fund accounts for the provision of sewer services to the residents of the City who have sanitary sewer service available. All activities necessary to provide such services are accounted for in this fund, including administration, operations, maintenance, billing, and collection. The summary of operations for 1997 and 1996 is as follows: December 31 1997 1996 —Operating revenue $ 638,280 $ 621,235 Operating expenses 688.989 765.045 Operating loss $ (50.709)$ (143,810) The operating expenses in 1997 decreased as a result of a reduction in maintenance and repairs and from continued efforts to reduce groundwater inflow and infiltration into the sanitary sewer system. This resulted in lower measured flows and subsequent treatment costs with the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES). The operating loss for 1997 does not include nonoperating revenues of $137,008 or nonoperating expenses of $26,772. The operating loss for 1996 also does not include nonoperating revenue of $135,093 or nonoperating expenses and transfers out of $111,564. Retained earnings as of December 31, 1997 were $1,967,525, which represents an increase of $217,692 from 1996, net of the effects of depreciation on contributed assets and nonoperating items. Golf C ourse Operating Fund The Golf Course Operating Fund accounts for the operation of the City-owned and operated golf course facility. All activities necessary for operations are accounted for in this fund, including administration, operations, and maintenance. The summary of operations for 1997 and 1996 is as follows: December 31 1997 1996 Gross profit and operating revenue $ 206,464 $ 192,353 Operating expenses 152.436 144.658 Operating income $ 54.028 $ 47.695 The operating income for 1997 does not include nonoperating revenue of $15,687. The operating income for 1996 does not include nonoperating revenue of $12,573, and nonoperating expenses of $3,252. Retained earnings as of December 31, 1997 were $397,021, which represents an increase of $70,368 from 1996, net of the effects of depreciation on contributed assets and nonoperating Items. -11- r To the City Council and Citizens of the City of Orono May 15, 1998 D ebt A dministration At December 31,1997, the City had six bond issues outstanding. The City ’s legal debt limitation based on state statutes, equals 2% of market value. All City bonded debt at December 31,1997 is special assessment or revenue funded and therefore is excluded from the limit. The City bond rating from Moody’s Investors Service is Aal for all bond issues except the 1991 Public Facilities Revenue Bond which has a bond rating from Moody's Investors Service of Aa. ® C ash Management Cash temporarily idle during the year was invested in demand deposits, money market funds, obligations of federal agencies, the U.S. Treasury, obligations of local governmental units, the State of Minnesota repurchase a^eements. bankers’ acceptances, and commercial paper. The City ’s investment objective as stated in the investment policy is to first ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio second to maximize yield while matching maturity dates with expenditure needs, and third to diversify the mvestment portfolio by financial institution, government agency, or by the corporation in the case of commercial paper to reduce the exposure to risk of loss. At December 31,1997, the City had an investment portfolio including certificates of deposit of $9,378,756, at cost (exclusive of the assets held by deferred compensation trustees) diversified as shown in the following table: Type of Investment Investment Pool - Money Market Funds Certificates of Deposit U.S. Federal Agencies U.S. Treasury Obligations City of Goodview, Minnesota State of Minnesota Commercial Paper Cost Percent $ 204,731 2.18%^ ■ 362,331 3.86 4,516,199 48.16 400,250 4.27 50,000 0.53 235,000 2.51 3.610.245 38.49 $ 9,378.756 100.00%- For the year ended December 31, 1997, the City had cash and investment interest earnings of $481,754 at an average yield of 6.07%. Risk Management ^e City participates in the liability, property, and workers’ compensation programs sponsored by the league of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. In addition, the City appoints an agent of record to assist with the administration, loss prevention, and risk management. -12- J I *To the City Council and Citizens of the City of Orono May 15, 1998 i 4 Other Information Independent Audit h<.miesota State Statutes require that the City have an aruiual audit performed by a certified public I?' public accounting firm of Malloy, Th, in^ ’ a •’ * ‘^P- P A- to perform the audit for the year ended December 31,1997 SMtion Tth- *'”“““1 s'cicn'ccls is included in the Financial Award accounting pnnciples and applicable legal requirements. valid for a period of one year only. We believe that our current Comprehensive Annual Financial Report continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program’s requirements and we are submitting it to the GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate. Acknowledgments “PP'“‘U‘i°" '» 'be entire City staff for their individual contributions in tafoSil 5 P"P““'™ Pf *b'f sepon and to the outside agencies who assisted with essential Cou^^ ''’‘P •“ “P'P“ appreciation to the Mayor and City CMncilmembers for their interest and support in planning and conducting the financial operations of the Sincerely, Ronald JrMoorse Administrator Thomas M. Kuehn Finance Director •13- i ^ r THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK ' i t, [*■ ! i: r i L1 1 I « ■ r"- ^:k It M Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Presented to City of Orono, Minnesota For its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 1996 A Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting is presented by the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada to government units and public employee retirement systems whose comprehensive annual financial reports (CAFRs) achieve the highest standards in government accounting and financial reporting. President Executive Director -14- : j j THIS PAGE left INTENTIONALLY BLANK M<^ PRINCIPALS KENNETH W MALLOY. CPA THOMAS M MONTAGUE. CPA THOMAS A KARNOWSKI. CPA PAUL A RADOSEVICH. CPA WILLIAM J LAUER CPA INDEPENDENT AUDITOR VS RFPOPT City Council and Residents City of Orono Orono, Minnesota We have audited the general purpose finMcial statements of the City of Orono, Minnesota, as of and for the year ended December 31,1997, as listed in the table of contents. These general purpose financial statements are the responsibility of the City’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these general purpose financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards ^plicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditinp Standard.s. issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the general purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures m the general purpose financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall general purpose financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the general purpose financial statements referred to above present fairly in all material reacts, the financial position of the City of Orono at December 31,1997, and the results of its operations and cash flows of the propnetary fund type for the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. ^ r In accordance wth Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated May 15,1998, on our consideration of the City of Orono’s internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants. Oui audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the general purpose financial statements taken as a whole. The combining and individual fund statements and financial schedules as listed in the table of contents are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the general purpose financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in our audit of the general purpose financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the general purpose financial statements taken as a whole. The statistical information as listed in the table of contents is not necessary for a fair presentation of the general purpose financial statements, but is presented as additional analytical data. This information is unaudited and we do not expre;>s an opinion on it. May 15, 1998 C«?M T ir iiSO lo kCOOl Jisi r AMTEl 410 PAMa NATK>NAL BANK BUILDlNO S.lSl WAV^ATA BOULt VAfU) MlNNFAPOilS MlNNtSOTAbb416 TF ltPtONK 612 545 0424 TFLtFAX 612 545 0569 -15- -1-—-Vi e* t»*y n CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Combined Balance Sheet All Fund Types and Account Groups As of December 31,1997 (with Comparative Totals as of December 31,1996) Governmental Fund Types Assets and Other Debits Assets Cash and temporary investments Cash and investments held by trustee Receivables Accounts Accrued interest Delinquent taxes Delinquent special assessments Deferred special assessments Contract for deed Due from other funds Due from other governments Inventories Prepaid items Deferred charges Other assets Property, plant, and equipment - net Other debits Amount available in Debt Service Funds General Fund for vested vacation and severance benefits Amount to be provided for debt service Total assets and other debits Special Debt Capital General Revenue Service Project $ 1,924,159 $ 2,879,094 $ 1,415,045 S 697,138 — -—421,263 — 4,877 _—— 38,123 36^34 25,737 27,360 39,112 —6,880 1,534 5,195 —4,517 681 > ——1,801,861 44,800 3,531 ——— ——9,215 161,800 40,249 50,000 6,626 328,267 9,215 2,666 ——— ——— ——-- r - ■ ———— r S 2,067,127 $ 2,965,328 $ 3,691,144 S 1,261,580 See notes to financial statements •16- Exhibit A-1 Proprietary Fiduciary Totals Fund Type Fund Type Account Groups (Memorandum Only) General Trust and General Long-Term Enterprise Agency Fixed Assets Debt 1997 1996 $ 2.094.043 S $$S 9,009,479 $8,074.506 ——421,263 1,338,135 309,734 -—314,611 331,21511,688 ———139,142 307,8102,112 ———49,638 55,02815,286 --—25,679 34,417226,524 ——-2,073.185 943.414 ——3,531 5,560 155,438 — 171,015 580,580 170,095 415,3032.410 ——-2,410 2,268 ———13,221 ““—-9,215 12,295 mmm ——-2,666 3,7408;J93.819 6.645,121 14,938,940 14,467,100 —--1,867,604 1,867,604 1,604,920 -—-152,262 152,262 151.520 ——5,117,396 5,117.396 4.000.080 $ 11,111,054 $$ 6.645.121 S 7,137,262 $ 34,878,616 $31,930,627 -17- (continued) r CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Combined Balance Sheet All Fund Types and Account Groups (continued) As of December 31,1997 (with Comparative Totals as of December 31, 1996) Governmental Fund Types Special Debt Capital ^ * General Revenue Service Project Liabilities, Equity, and Other Credits Liabilities Accounts and contracts payable $ 57,263 S 14,809 S 1.067 $ 154,712 Accrued salaries and compensated absences payable 28,851 ———— Accrued interest payable ———— Due to other funds 9,215 ——161,800 * Due to other governments 139,804 —-173,742 Deferred credits ———— Deferred revenue 47,838 —1,822,473 47,015 - Deferred compensation payable to employees -—-— Long-term debt ———— Total liabilities 282,971 14,809 1,823,540 537,269 Equity and other credits Investment in general fixed assets -——— Contributed capital -———• - Retained earnings Unreserved -——— Fund balance Reserved for debt service --421,263 — Unreserved r— Designated for emergency contingencies -—-325,000 • 4 J Designated for capital projects --—274,791 1 Designated for crime prevention —10,975 —— Designated for capital outlay -2.939,544 —— Designated for debt service ——1.446.341 —w. Designated fur vacatioa'severance benefits 152,262 ——— Undesignated 1,631,894 —-124,520 Total equity and other credits 1,784,156 2,950,519 1,867,604 724,311 Total liabilities, equity, and other credits S 2,067,127 $ 2,965,328 $ 3,691,144 S 1,261480 See notes to financial statements -18- - i J r. u I f f i I » i: Exhibit A-1 Proprietaiy Fiduciary Totals Account Groups •19. >'"bM 1 ( Enterprise Trust and Agency General Fixed Assets General Long-Term Debt 1997 1996 — S 34.745 $S $S 262.596 S 230,938 26,642 ———55.493 59,033 22,180 ———22.180 26,134 ■ 1 _171,015 170,095 91,460 ——405.006 104,924 •n 83,418 ———83,418 92,948 *—1,917.326 758,863 w ——925,112 1,305.000 ——7.137,262 8.442,262 7,306,520 1,563,445 mm 7.137,262 11.359,296 9,674,567 _6.645.121 __6,645,121 6,254,531 6,733,160 —-—6.733,160 6,924,864 2.814.449 ———2.814,449 2,413,124 -—-—421.263 413,023 325,000 325,000 _—274.791 172,906 —10,975 - 2.939,544 3,073,936 f—•1,446,341 1,191,897 —152,262 151,520 •»—--1,756,414 1,335,259 9,547,609 —6,645,121 -23,519,320 22,256,060 S 11,111,054 $$ 6.645.121 $ 7,137,262 $ 34.878,616 S 31.930,627 i .A CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Combined Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance All Governmental Fund Types and Expendable Trust Fund Year Ended December 31,1997 (with Comparative Totals for Year Ended December 31,1996) See notes to financial statements General Special Revenue Debt Service Capital Project Revenue Property taxes S 1,687^66 $$ 291.206 S 84.724 Special assessments 44 —351.539 15.792 Licenses and permits 248.075 — Intergovernmental 504.308 50,000 45.963 329,340 Charges for services 1.048.514 — Fines and forfeits 83.396 — Other Interest earned on investments 77.438 172.076 82,600 41.515 Rents and refunds 67.404 Miscellaneous 6.520 62.221 8.832 Total revenue 3.722.965 284.297 780.140 471.371 Expenditures Current General govenunent 764.875 — Public safety I.87I.264 Streets 469.012 •• Parks and recreation 50.285 — Recycling 68.773 Miscellaneous 97.590 1,050 __ Capital outlay 64.749 400.828 __1.885.137 Debt service Principal retirement ——380.000 a. Interest —303.419 Fiscal agent fees and other -—13.197 Total expenditures 3.386.548 401.878 696.616 1.885.137 Excess (deficiency) of revenue over expenditures 336.417 (117.581)83.524 (1.413.766) Other fiiumcing sources (uses) Bond proceeds (net)—49,160 1.704,478 Sale of fixed assets •20,817 Operating transfers in 95.000 130,000 20.897 Operating transfers (out)(95.000)(130.000)(20.897) Total other financing sources (uses)(95.000)(14.183)179.160 1.704.478 Excess (deficiency) of revenue and other financing sources over expenditures and other financing uses 241.417 (131.764)262.684 290.712 Fund balance Beginning of year 1.551.086 3.073.936 1.604.920 433.599 Residual equity transfers in —8,347 Residual equity transfers (out)(8.347)——•• End of year S 1.784.156 $ 2.950.519 $ 1.867.604 S 724.311 I i ‘1 I -20- r Exhibit A-2 »• > ^ I Fiduciary Totals Fund Type (Memorandum Only) Expendable Trust Fund 1997 1996 — $S 2,063,196 $1,984,636 —367,375 199,097 -248,075 207,277 —929,611 702,542 —1,048,514 976,891 %>•-83,396 71,556 —373,629 348,073 . i —67,404 41,913 60,215 137,788 108,704 60,215 5,318,988 4,640,689 764,875 719,153 —1,871,264 1,696,087 —469,012 468,892 —50,285 51,142 *-68,773 68,634 60,215 158,855 431,501 -2,350,714 471,359 r>_380,000 300,000 w —303,419 313,960 —13,197 6,722 60,215 6,430,394 4,527,450 w —(1.111.406)113,239 IpW 1,753,638 . —20,817 - r • —245,897 384,700 —(245,897)(384.700) —1,774,455 — ♦ ^ 663,049 113,239 M M •»6,663,541 6,550,302 —8,347 275,241 \ ‘—(8,347)(275.241) M' S S 7.326.590 S 6.663.541 * rt m \ i u ' /‘ -21- CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Combined Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual (GAAP Basis) General and Special Revenue Funds Year Ended December 31,1997 Fund balance Beginning of year Residual equity transfer in Residual equity transfer (out) End of year See notes to financial statements General Fund Over (Under) Budget Actual Budget Revenue Property taxes S 1,680,980 $ 1,687,266 $ 6,286 Special assessments —44 44 Licenses and permits 195,000 248,075 53,075 Intergovernmental 496,945 504,308 7,363 Charges for services 950,590 1,048,514 97,924 Fines and forfeits 64,400 83,396 18,996 Other Interest earned on investments 63,950 77,438 13,488 • . Rents and refunds 31,400 67,404 36,004 Miscellaneous 7,575 6,520 (1.055) Total revenue 3,490,840 3,722,965 232,125 *h. . Expenditures Current General government 764,945 764,875 (70) Public safety 1,869,815 1,871,264 1,449 Streets 469,020 469,012 (8) Parks and recreation 50,305 50,285 (20) Recycling 68,805 68,773 (32) Miscellaneous 97,655 97,590 (65)0^ ' Capital outlay 66,320 64,749 (1.571) Total expenditures 3,386,865 3,386,548 (317) Excess (deficiency) of : revenue over expenditures 103,975 336,417 232,442 — Other financing sources (uses)— Sale of fixed assets — Operating transfers in ——— • Operating transfers (out)(95,000)(95,000)— Total other financing sources (uses)(95,000)(95,000)- Excess (deficiency) of revenue and other financing sources over expenditures and other financing uses 1_ 8.975 241,417 $ 232.442 1,551,086 (8,347) S 1.784.156 •22- : J > t f rf L' Exhibit A-3 Special Revenue Funds (mm* Budget Actual Over (Under) Budget U $s $ ——— ;■ i =—— 50,000 50,000 — —— ••—- * 173,000 172,076 (924) ——__ i 40,335 62,221 21,886 263.335 284,297 20,962 t-J-—— ' ' ! -— - ■ ;——— —- $m ——«- i '810 1,050 240M412,351 400,828 (11.523) * 4I3.I6I 401,878 (1 1.283) A ■:(149,826)(117,581)32,245 f *• —20,817 20.817 95,000 95,000 i ■(130,000)(130,000) km (35,000)(14.183)20,817 1 • $ (184.826)(131,764)$ 53.062 3,073.936 8.347 $ 2.950.519 i -23- r CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Statement of Revenue. Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings Proprietary Fund Type Years Ended December 31, 1997 and 1996 Sales and cost of sales Sales Cost of sales Gross profit Operating revenue Metered water sales User charges Green fees Equipment rental Other Total operating revenue Total gross profit and operating revenue Operating expenses Personal services Purchased water Sewer disposal charges Professional services Operating and maintenance supplies Heat, light, and power Depreciation Rent and equipment Maintenance and repairs Administrative and other expense Other expenses Total operating expenses Operating loss Nonoperating revenue (expense) Property tax revenue Intergovernmental revenue Interest income Amortization of deferred credits Interest expense Revenue bond expense Loss on disposal of assets To^ nonoperating revenue (expense) Income before operating transfers Operating transfers Opmting transfers in Operating transfers (out) Total operatmg transfers Net income Credit for depreciation on contributed assets Net increase in retained earnings Retained earnings Beginning of year End of year See notes to financial sutements -24- Exhibit A-4 1997 1996 S .539 S 19,163 11,762 1141S 9,777 7,848 % 217,668 249,504 636,204 619,169 165,139 152,947 31,241 31,523 5J37 4,135 1,055,589 1.057378 1.065J66 1,065,126 278,617 276401 10,598 13,092 274328 318,940 18388 22475 36,196 38,889 54.308 47,992 257,659 257,488 7304 6,977 59,468 85.981 82,521 84,824 5,427 7,028 1,084,714 1,159,887 (19448)(94.761) -- 108,009 93,566 24,807 — 140,807 163,007 9,530 9,531 (54,022)(82,482)- (162)(1.100) —(3.512) 228.969 179,010 209.621 84449 r 70.000 (70,000) —-C' 209.621 84449 191.704 192,574 0 401425 276,823 - 2.413,124 2.136.301 S 2.814.449 AJL4JJL124 r M t > Exhibit A-5 CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Statement of Cash Flows 1 Proprietary Fund Type 1 Years Ended December 31. 1997 and 1996 1 1 Enterorise Funds 1997 1996 Cash flows from operating activities Operating loss S (19.348)S (94,761) Adjustments to reconcile operating loss to net cash provided by operating activities Depreciation 257,659 257,488 Loss on disposal of assets (3,512) j Amortization of revenue bond discount 10,416 Change in assets and liabilities (Increase) decrease in Accounts receivable 20.216 (41,119) Due from other governmental units 105.792 35,428 i Inventory (142)21>Prepaid items 374 3,576 Increase (decrease) in Accounts payable 3.499 (32,791) .Salaries and compensated absences payable (8.491)(1,719) Due to other governmental units 86,721 (28,599) Net cash provided by operating activities 446,280 104,428 , :Cash flows from capital and related financing activities Taxes collected for revenue bond debt 107,821 92,983 ;Special assessments for revenue bond debt 74,466 81,231 ;Intergovernmental grants received 24,807 Acquisition or construction of capital assets (338,909)(106,450) ••Principal paid on revenue bonds (245,000)(1,750,000) Interest paid on revenue bonds (57.976)(104,104) Other charges on revenue bonds (162)(l.lOO) —Net cash used by capital and related financing activities (434,953)(1,787,440) Cash flows from investing activities Interest received on investments 152,179 159.005 Cash flows from noncapiul financing activities Operating transfer from Sewer Fund 70,000 1 Operating transfer to Water Fund (70,000) Net cash provided by noncapital financing activities - • J Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 163,506 (1424.007) Cash and cash equivalents n Beginning of year 1,9.30.537 3.454,544 /1 End of year 5 2.094.043 S 1.930.537 1 A Cash and cash equivalents I <Unrestricted cash and temporary investments $ 2.094.043 S 1.930437 Supplementary schedule of noncash investing, capital, and financing activities Assets contributed from other funds MCES current value credit applied See notes to financial statcinents -25- $__LIQ3^I89 4.594 4.594 ‘ ♦ i,. L... ■ : i i'-i i ' »* w If 5 ♦ • *«• — i K -A »-. > CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements December 31,1997 NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES A. Organization The City operates under "Optional Plan A" form of government as defined in the State of Minnesota Statutes. Under this plan, the City Council, composed of an elected mayor and four elected tmstees or r 'vncilmembers, exercises legislative authority and determines all matters of policy. The City Council, is responsible for the proper administering of all affairs relating The financial statements and the accounting policies of the City conform to generally accepted accounting principles as applicable tc governmental units. B. Reporting Entity As required by generally accepted accounting principles, these financial statements include the City of Orono (the primary government) and its component unit. A component unit is a legally separate entity for which the primary government is financially accountable, or for which the exclusion of the component unit would render the financial statements of the primary government misleading. The criteria used to determine if the primary government is financially accountable for a component unit include whether or not the primary government appoints the voting majority of the potential component unit ’s board, is able to impose its will on the potential component unit, is in a relationship of financial benefit or burden with the potential component unit, or is fiscally depended upon by the potential component unit. The Orono Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) is a legally separate organization created in accordance with Minnesota Statutes § 469.003. Its purpose is to clear and redevelop blighted areas within the City and to provide adequate housing for low and moderate income residents. The HRA is fiscally dependent upon the City of Orono, and its governing board consists of the City’s mayor and councilmembers. Therefore, the HRA has been reported as a blended component unit of the City, with its funds reported as though they are funds of the City. There are no other organizations that when considered would be included in the financial statements as a component unit. C. Fund Accounting The accounts of the City are organized on the basis of funds and account groups, each of which is considered a separate accounting entity. The City maintains the following funds, grouped by fund type and account group: CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Finarxial Statements (continued) December 31. 1997 NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) 1. Governmental Fund Types «. General Fund - The General Fund is the general operating fund of the City. It is used to account for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund. b. Special Revenue Funds - The Special Revenue Funds are used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources (other than expendable trusts or major capital projects) that are restricted to expenditures for specified purposes. c. Debt Service Funds - The Debt Service Funds are used to account for the accumulation of resources for, and the payment of, bonded general long-term debt principal, interest, and related cost.s. d. Capital Project Funds - The Capital Project Funds are used to account for financial resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities (other than those financed by Proprietary Funds). 2. Proprietary Fund Type a. Enterprise Funds - The Enterprise Funds are used to account for operations that are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises - here the intent of the governing body is that the costs of providing goods or services to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through user charges. 3. Fiduciary Fund Type a. Expendable Trust Fund - The Expendable Trust Fund is used to account for assets held by the City in a trustee capacity. The Expendable Trust Fund includes the City’s flexible benefit plan (Internal Revenue Code § 125). b. Agency Funds - The Agency Funds are used to account for assets held by the City in the capacity of agent. 4. Account Groups a. General Fixed Assets - This separate account group conta.us the fixed assets of the governmental fund types. b. General Long-Term Debt - This account group contains the long- :erm obligations of the City, other than those liabilities included in the Proprietary Funds. -27- I -CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1997 NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) D. Measurement Focus and Basis of Accounting The accounting and financial reporting treatment applied to a fund is determined by its measurement focus and its basis of accounting. Measurement Focus i , i I » The measurement focus of a fund determines what the fund measures. All governmental funds and the Expendable Tr »st Fund are accounted for using a current financial resources measurement focus. With this measurement focus, only current assets and current liabilities generally are included on the balance sheet. Operating statements of these funds present increases (revenue and other financing sources) and decreases (expenditures and other financing uses) in net current assets. Proprietary Funds are accounted for on a flow of economic resources measurement focus. With this measurement focus, all assets and liabilities associated with the operation of these funds are included on the balance sheet. Fund equity (net total assets) is segregated into contributed capital and retained earnings components. Proprietary fund type operating statements present increases (revenues) and decreases (expenses) in net total assets. Agency Funds are custodial in nature (assets equal liabilities) and do not involve measurement of results of operations. Fixed assets used in governmental fund type operations and long-term liabilities expected to be financed from governmental funds are accounted for in two account groups, as they are concerned only with the measurement of financial position, and are not involved with measurement of results of operations. Basis of Accounting A fund’s basis of accounting determines when a transaction or event is recognized in the fund’s operating statement. > < 11 The modified accrual basis of accounting is used by all governmental fund types. Expendable Trust Funds, and Agency Funds. Under this basis of accounting, transactions are recorded in the following manner: -28- CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial StatCiHents (continued) December 31, 1997 NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) 1. Revenue Recognition - Revenue is recognized when it becomes measurable and available. "Measurable" means the amount of the transaction can be determined and "available" means collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to be used to pay liabilities of the current period. Major revenue that is susceptible to accrual includes property taxes, special assessments, intergovernmental revenue, charges for services, and interest earned on investments. Other revenue that is not susceptible to accrual includes licenses and permits, fees, and miscellaneous revenue. Such revenue is recorded only when received because it is not measurable until collected. 2. Recording of Expenditures - Expenditures are recognized under the modified accrual basis of accounting when the related fund liability is incurred, except for principal and interest on general long-term debt which is recognized when due. Proprietary Funds are accounted for using the accrual basis of accounting. Under this method, revenues are recognized when earned and expenses are recognized when they are incurred. The City applies only those applicable pronouncements of the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued on or before November 30, 1989 in accounting and reporting for its proprietary operations. E. Cash and Investments Cash and temporary investments u'^clude balances from all funds that are combined and invested to the extent available in various securities authorized by state law. Earnings on pooled investments are allocated to the respective funds '>n ♦he basis of applicable cash balance participation by each fund. Cash and investments held by trustee includes debt service funds held in a trust account as required by the 1991 Public Facilities Revenue Bond debt issue. Investments are stated at cost or amortized cost. F. Property Taxes Property tax levies are set up by the City Council in October of each year, and are certified to Hennepin County for collection in the following year. In Minnesota, counties act as collection agents for all property taxes. A portion of the property taxes levied is paid by the State of Mirmesota through Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid (HACA), which is included in intergovernmental revenue in the financial statements. The county spreads all levies over taxable property. Such taxes become a lien on January 1 and arc recorded as receivables by the City on that date. Revenue is accrued and recognized in the year collectible. Taxes which remain unpaid at December 31 are classified as delinquent taxes receivable. Revenue from property taxes which is not collected within 60 days of year-end is deferred since it is not available to meet obligations of the current year. ■w -29- CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1997 . ♦ « NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) Property taxes may be paid by taxpayers in two equal installments on May 15 and October 15. The county provides tax settlements to cities and other taxing districts several times throughout the year. G. Special Assessments Special assessments represent the financing for public improvements paid for by benefitting property owners. These assessments are recorded as receivables upon certification to the county. The corresponding revenue from the delinquent (unremitted) and deferred (certified but not yet levied) special assessments receivable is deferred until the year in which it becomes available (collected within 60 days of year-end). H. Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market on the first-in, first-out basis and are accounted for using the consumption method. Inventory in the Golf Course Operating Fund consists of resale items. I. Property, Plant, and Equipment Fixed assets are stated at cost, estimated historical cost, or in the case of contributions, at fair market value at the time received. ♦« 1. General Fixed Assets Account Group - No depreciation has been provided on general fixed assets. The costs of property, plant, and equipment are accounted for as current expenditures cf the governmental fund t>-pes in the year purchased. The City has elected not to record infrastructure fixed assets in its accounting records. Interest incurred during construction of general fixed assets is not capitalized. 2. Proprietary Fund Type - Fixed assets of the Proprietary Funds are depreciated using the straight- line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, as follows: ♦ ♦ I • I * Buildings and improvements Equipment Distribution/collection system 25-50 years 3-20 years 10-75 years Depreciation on contributed assets charged to operations is closed to the contributed equity account. J. Liability for Compensated Absences Vacation and sick leave expected to be liquidated with expendable available financial resources is reported as an expenditure and a fund liability of the governmental fund type that will pay it. The remaining portion of such obligations is recorded in the General Long-Term Debt Accoimt Group. The unused vacation of the Proprietary Funds is included in accrued liabilities of the respective fund. t • -30- CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1997 NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) K. Bond Discounts/Issuance Costs In the governmental fund types, bond discounts and issuance costs are recognized in the current period. Bond discounts and issuance costs in the Enterprise Funds are deferred and amortized over the term of the bonds using the bonds outstanding method which approximates the effective interest rate method. L. Budgets and Budgetary Accounting Each Fall, after holding a meeting to obtain public comments, the City Council legally adopts the General Fund and all of the Special Revenue Funds’ budgets for the following fiscal year beginning January 1. These budgets are adopted on a basis consistent with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The City has established budgetary control at the department level. City management must request Council approval before exceeding the budget at that level. City management may transfer appropriations within the department level without Council approval. Appropriations lapse at year-end; however, the Council may approve the carryover of specific amounts. Budget amounts are presented on a modified accrual basis of accounting and include several amendments adopted by the City Council during the year. Encumbrance accounting is not used. During the year, the City made significant budget amendments to the General Fund appropriations and the Special Revenue Funds’ revenue and appropriations as reflected in the following tables: Adopted Budeet Net Budget Amendment Amended Budget Genera] Fund Expenditures Mayor and Council $ 51,970 $ 410 $ 52.’80 Administration 197,295 3,410 200,705 Elcclioa*^20 510 530 Assessing 78,065 690 78,755 Legal 97,700 (14,950)82,750 Human services 16,155 (2,100)14,055 Central services 168,430 14,400 182,830 Police protection 1,308,170 33,360 1,341,530 Fire protection 218,600 2,460 221,060 Protective inspection and zoning 314,870 42,850 357,720 Emergency preparedness 2,500 1,190 3,690 Animal control 15,135 (3,000)12,135 Streets 495,170 (26,150)469,020 Parks and recreation 52,555 (2,250)50,305 Recycling 73,805 (5,000)68,805 Engineering 14,420 (1,200)13,220 Special services - consulting/policc 42,050 4,780 46,830 Contingency 29,255 8,350 37,605 Operating transfer out 118,500 (23,500)95,000 Net amendments $ 34.2o0 -31- M » • (« I • t • ' I 1 CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1997 NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) The expenditure budget amendments in the General Fund were for the following purposes: Mayor and Council - The budget was increased to fund higher than anticipated membership costs for local and state-wide mimicipal associations. ® Administration - The budget was increased to reflect the mid-year salary adjustments for the Deputy Clerk and City Administrator. Elections - The budget was increased to fund the City ’s share of pass-through expenses incurred by the County. Assessing - The budget was increased to reflect an increase in the assessor’s contract for services. Legal - The budget was decreased to reflect the lower than anticipated legal consulting and prosecution services costs. * Human Services - The budget was decreased to reflect the decrease in charges from various senior and community service organizations. ® Central Services - The budget was increased to reflect additional costs telated to buildings and grounds maintenance and to fund a new permit tracking system. Police Protection - The budget was increased to reflect the addition of a full-time patrol officer and higher than anticipated squad car maintenance and repairs. " Fire Protection - The budget was increased to reflect increased charges from the four cities providing fire services to the City. Protective Inspection and Zoning - The budget was increased to reflect severance pay for the retirement of the Planning and Zoning Administrator and other related personnel changes. Emergency Preparedness - The budget was increased to fund higher than anticipated repair and maintenance costs for the weather sirens. “ Animal Control - The budget was decreased to reflect lower than anticipated costs for personal services and animal care. “ Streets - The budget was decreased to reflect lower than anticipated costs for vehicle maintenance, contracted street repairs, and equipment rental. Parks and Recreation - The budget was decreased to reflect lower than anticipated personal service costs. -32- CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1997 NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) Recycling - The budget was decreased to reflect lower costs for the Spring and Fall clean-up programs. Engineering - The budget was decreased to reflect the decrease in general engineering services from outside consultants. Special Services - consuiting/police - The budget was increased for higher than anticipated police special duty assignments and engineering services related to development activity. Contingency - The budget was decreased to reflect the unused portion of the current year contingency amount. Operating Transfer Out - The budget was decreased to reflect the actual transfer to the Improvement and Equipment Capital Outlay Special Revenue Fund. Special Revenue Funds Expenditures Park Fund Net Adopted Budget Amended Budget Amendment Budget Capital outlay Improvement and Equipment Capital Outlay Fund Capital outlay Building Capital Outlay Fund Capital outlay Drug and Felony Forfeiture Fund Miscellaneous $ 109,000 $ 108,976 $ 217,976 146,040 32.240 178,280 9,800 6,295 16,095 810 810 The expenditure budget amendments in the Special Revenue Funds were for the following purposes: Park Fund - The budget was increased to provide for additional costs related to the Old Crystal Bay Road Bike/Hike trail. Improvement and Equipment Capital Outlay Fund •* The budget was increased to provide for City of Long Lake reimbursement for Orono’s share of a new fire rescue vehicle. Building Capital Outlay Fund - The budget was increased to provide for additional costs related to an entrance canopy at the Public Works building and safety improvements for fuel tanks. Drug and Felony Forfeiture Fund - The budget was increased to provide for costs related to drug and felony forfeitures. -33- • 1 J r I I CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1997 NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) M. Memorandum Only Columns Because the accounting system is organized and operated on a fund basis, the columns on the combined financial statements captioned, "Totals (Memorandum Only)," are presented for informational purposes only and are not intended to represent consolidated information. Data in these columns does not present financial position, results of operations, or cash flows in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Interfund eliminations have not been made in the aggregation of this data. N. Comparative Data/Reclassifications Comparative total data for the prior year has been presented in the accompanying financial statements in order to provide an understanding of changes in the City ’s financial position and operations. However, comparative data has not been presented in all statements because its inclusion would make certain statements unduly complex and difficult to understand. Also, certain amounts presented in the prior year data have been reclassified in order to be consistent with the current year ’s presentation. O. Statement of Cash Flows For purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows, the City considers all highly liquid debt instruments with an original maturity from the time of purchase by the City of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Proprietary Funds’ portion in the Citywide cash and investment management pool is considered to be cash equivalent. P. Risk Management The City is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts; theft of, damage to, and destruction of assets; errors and omissions; and natural disasters. The City participates in tne League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMC Trust), a public entity risk pool for its general property and casualty, workers’ compensation, and other miscellaneous insurance coverages. The LMC Trust operates as a common risk management and insurance program for approximately 780 cities. The City pays an annual premium to the LMC Trust for insurance coverage. The LMC Ti>.st agreement provides that the Trust will be self-sustaining tlvough member premiums and will reinsure through commercial companies for claims in excess of certain limits. The major reinsurance points are generally $200,000 per occurrence for property loss or damage and $450,000 per occurrence for workers’ compensati n. The City also carries commercial insurance for certain other risks of loss, including employee health insurance and liquor liability. Settled claims resulting from these risks have not exceeded commercial insurance coverage in any of the past three fiscal years. There were no significant reductions in the City ’s insurance coverage in 1997. ) I -34- CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1997 NOTE 2 - DEPOSITS AND INVESTMENTS A. Deposits In accordance with applicable Minnesota Statutes, the City maintains deposits at depository banks authorized by the City Council. Minnesota Statutes require that all deposits be protected by insurance, surety bond, or collateral. The market value of collateral pledged must equal 110% of the deposits not covered by insurance or bonds. Authorized collateral includes treasury bills, notes and bonds; issues of U.S. Government agencies; general obligations rated "A" or better; revenue obligations rate "AA" or better; irrevocable standard letters of credit issued by the Federal Home Loan Bond; and Certificates ot Deposit. Minnesota Statutes require that securities pledged as collateral be held in safekeeping in a restricted account at the federal reserve bank or in an account at a trust department of a commercial bank or other financial instimtion that is not owned or controlled by the financial institution furnishing the collateral. At year-end, the carrying amount of the City’s deposits was $41.3,957, while the balance on the bank records was $609,818. At December 31, 1997, all deposits were insured or collateralized by securities held by the City’s agent in the City’s name. B. Cash on Hand Cash in the possession of the City, consisting of petty cash and change funds, at year-end totaled $360. C. Investments The City may also invest idle funds as authorized by Minnesota Statutes, as follows: direct obligations or obligations guaranteed by the United States or its agencies; shares of investment companies registered under the Federal Investment Company Act of 1940 and receives the highest credit rating, is rated in one of the two highest rating categories by a statistical rating agency, and all of the investments have a final maturity of thirteen months or less; general obligations rated "A" or better; revenue obligations rated "AA" or better, general obligations of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency rate "A" or better; bankers’ acceptances of United States banks eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System; commercial paper issued by United States corporations or their Canadian subsidiaries, of the highest quality category by at lease two nationally recognized rating agencies, and maturing in 270 days or less; Guaranteed Investment Contracts ^ranteed by a United States commercial bank, domestic branch of a foreign bank, or a United States insurance company, and with a credit quality in one of the top two highest categories; repurchase or reverse purchase agreements and securities lending agreements with financial instimtions qualified as a "depository" by the government entity, with banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System with capitalization exceeding $10,000,000, a primary reporting dealer in U.S. government securities to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or certain Minnesota securities broker-dealers. -35- r • f (• li CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1997 NOTE 2 - DEPOSITS AND LNVESTMENTS (CONTINUED) The City’s investments are categorized below to give an indication of the level of custodial credit risk assumed at year-end. Category 1 includes investments that are insured or registered or for which the secunties arc held by the City or its agent in the City’s name. Category 2 includes uninsured and unregistered investments for which the securities are held by the counterparty’s trust department or agent in the City’s name. Category 3 includes uninsured and unregistered investments for which the securities are held by the counterparty or by its trust department or agent but not in the City’s name. Deposits and investment balances at December 31, 1997 are as follows: Custodial Credit Risk Catecorv Carrying Value Market Value123 U.S. Government securities State and local government securities Commercial paper $ 4,501,543 $ 285,000 3.179.530 - $414,906 430.715 $ 4,916,449 285,000 3.610.245 $ 4,923,441 287,246 3.640.019 8,850,706$ 7.966.073 S - S 845.621 8,811,694 Investment pools - unclassified Money market funds 204.731 204.731 Total investments 9,016,425 $ 9.055.437 Deposits Cash on hand 413,957 360 Total deposits, investments, and cash on hand S 9.430.742 Deposits, investments, and cash on hand are reported on the City’s combined balance sheet as follows: Cash ani^ temporary investments Cash and investments held by trustee $ 9,009,479 ____421.263 Total cash and investments $__9,430,742 -36- * b* .1 I J r CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1997 NOTE 3 - PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT A. Changes in General Fixed Assets Land and improvements Buildings and improvements Equipment B. Proprietary Fund Type Property, Plant, and Equipment Water Operating Sewer Operating Golf Course Operating Total Land and improvements $ 57,132 $ 16,654 $ 219,236 $ 293,022 Buildings and improvements 792,888 31,014 62,257 886,159 Equipment 77,843 77,352 119,656 274,851 Distribution/collection system 2,083,535 8,844,035 -10,927,570 Work in progress —17,317 -17.317 3,011,398 8,986,372 401,149 12,398,919 Less accumulated depreciation 1,030.148 2.991.814 83.138 4.105.100 ^ ‘ 981.250 $ 5,994,558 $ 318,011 $ 8,293,819 NOTE 4 - DEFERRED CREDITS AND i:, ’ '> *« A. Contract for Deed The City sold a section of land to a homeowners’ association on a contract for deed in February 1984. The sa! ^s price of $100,000 will be received in equal quarterly payments over a IS-year period, without interest. At December 31, 1997, the remaining balance of $3,531 on the contract for deed is recorded as deferred revenue in the General Fund until collected and available to finance current operations. -37- Balance Balance Beginning End of Year Additions Deletions of Year $ 1,554,208 $ 190,835 $$ 1,745,043 - 3,205,130 -1,899 3,203,231 1.495.193 288.993 87.339 1,696,847 r- - • $ 6,254.531 $ 479,828 $ 89,238 S 6.645,121 i • r ii 5 I -I i 4 * 1 I* fet CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1997 NOTE 4 - DEFERRED CREDITS AND REVENUE (CONTINUED) B. 1985 Special Assessments The City adopted a special assessment roll in 1985 which included $46,175 relating to improvements on City-owned property. The General Fund will pay these assessments over 15 years in annual installments with 9.2% interest. The remaining assessment principal balance of $9,215 at December 31,1997 has been recorded as due to/from other funds. The related revenue and charges have been deferred in the 1995 Refunding Bonds Debt Service and General Funds, respectively. C. Sewer Operating Enterprise Fund - Due From Other Governmental Units/Deferred Credits This amount represents the credits resulting from the transfer of the City ’s sewer treatment facilities to the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES). The remaining balance due from MCES is $ 136,616 for the facilities and is included in due from other governmental units as of December 31,1997. The total price for each portion of the facilities will be received over 30 years with interest at 4% per annum by credits against the annual sewage handling charges of MCES. MCES has included the cost of these facilities in its base rate, thus "payment" of credits is dependent upon MCES’s setting future user fees at a level sufficieiit to cover all such credits from participating municipalities. Therefore, the revenue has been deferred until such user fees are paid or accrued. Composition of the deferred balance is as follows: MCES Remaining Facilitv Acquisition Year Deferred Credits - Treatment Works 1971 $ 1,178 1963 Interceptor 1977 77,087 --1965 Interceptor 1977 5,153 $ 83,418 -38- CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1997 NOTE 5 - LONG-TERM DEBT A. Components of Long-Term Debt Final Balance Original Interest Issue Maturity End of Issue Rate Date Date Year General long-term debt General Obligation Bonds Improvement Bonds of 1982 $475,000 6.50-10.00%I2-1-I982 3-1-1999 $ 30,000 Improvement Bonds 0 ' of 1992 $2,000,000 3.30-5.50%8-1-1992 2-1-2008 1,625,000 Refunding Bonds of 1995 $360,000 3.85-4.15%12-26-1995 2-1-2002 300,000 Improvement Bonds 4 of 1997 S 1,760,000 4.20-5.20%7-1-1997 2-1-2013 1,760,000 Public Facilities Revenue Bo.?i. :fl991 $4,000,000 4.50-6.50%12-1-1991 2-1-2008 3,270,000 Vacation and severance benefits payable N/A N/A N/A N/A 152.262 Total general long-term debt 7,137,262 Proprietary Fund debt « ^ Revenue Bonds r* G.O. Refunding Bonds of 1995 $1,550,000 3.85-4.15%12-26-1995 2-1-2002 1.305.000 Total all long-term debt $ 8,442.262 -39- r jn^npiwry’iiiii » H . t« Im CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1997 NOTE 5 - LONG-TERM DEBT (CONTINUED) B. Statement of Changes in Long-Term Debt Balance Balance Beginning End of of Year Additions Retired Year —General long-term debt _General Obligation Bonds $ 2.135,000 $ 1,760,000$ 180,000$ 3,715,000 Public Facilities Revenue Bonds 3,470,000 -200,000 3.270,000 —Vacation and severance benefits payable - net 151,520 742 -152.262 5,756,520 1,760,742 380,000 7,137,262 Proprietary Fund debt Revenue Bonds 1.550,000 -245,000 1.305.000 i $ 7,306,520 $ 1,760,742 $ 625,000 $ 8.442.262 --C. Minimum Debt Payments Minimum annual principal and interest payments required to retire long-term debt, excluding vacation severance benefits payable: General —Year Ending Long-Term Enterprise December 31 Debt Funds Total 1998 $ 774,317 $299,674 $1,073,991 1999 848,641 305,513 1,154,154 2000 836,101 306,524 1,142,625 2001 833,465 291,036 1,124,501 !2002 828,471 231,941 1,060,412 Thereafter 5,477.614 -5.477.614 i $ 9,598,609 $1,434,688 $11,033,297 j -40- 4 CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1997 NOTE 5 - LONG-TERM DEBT (CONTINUED) D. Descriptions and Restrictions of Long-Term Debt 1. General Long-Term Debt General Obligation Bonds - These bonds were issued to finance various improvements and will be repaid from taxes and special assessments. Public Facilities Bonds of 1991 - These bonds were issued by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Orono for the purpose of financing the construction of facilities for a City meeting hall, City offices, police offices, detention and processing, public works office space, storage, maintenance, and repair of machinery and equipment, and a cold storage building. Pursuant to Minnesota StaUites § 469.103a, lease-purchase contracts between the Authority and the City and a Trust Indenture between the Authority and American National Bank and Trust Company have been established. The bonds are special obligations of the City as issuer and owner of the land and buildings. The City has pledged rental payments in amounts equal to the debt service requirements and plans to annually appropriate City funds available for this purpose. As required by bond covenant, a reserve account has been established with a trustee which is to be used to pay principal and interest on the bonds in the event that other available resources are inadequate to do so. In addition, Minnesota Statutes § 475.50, Subd. 5(e) allows cities to make a special levy (outside of levy limits) to pay principal and interest on bonds of another political subdivision. The Minnesota Department of Revenue has determined that because a Housing and Redevelopment Authority is a political subdivision of the state, a levy to pay principal and interest on the bonds would be outside the City’s levy limits. Vacation and Severance Benefits Payable - This liability represents vested benefits earned by employees other than Proprietary Fund employees through the end of the year (other than the current portion paid within 60 days), which will be paid or used in future periods. The liability for Proprietary Fund employees is included in the accrued liabilities of those funds. 2. General Long-Term Debt and Proprietary Fund Debt Refunding Bonds - In December 1995, the City issued $1,910,000 of General Obligation Refunding Bonds of 1995 to advance refund $360,000 of the City’s General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1985 and to advance refund $1,550,000 of the City’s General Obligation Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds of 1989. These bonds are now considered defeased. E. Ultimate Responsibility for Debt Long-term debt is backed by the full faith and credit of the City, except the Public Facilities Revenue Bonds of 1991. -41- I »CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1997 NOTE 5 - LONG-TERM DEBT (CONTINUED) F. Resources to Meet Future Debt Requirements ® Amounts Available for Long-Term Debt - Available fund balance designated or reserved for repayment of long-term debt includes: General Fund $ 152,262 Debt Service Funds 1,867.604 ! I i -42- I 4 I » $ 2,019,866 Amount to be Provided in the General Long-Term Debt Account Group - This amount represents future revenue to be generated for debt payments, generally including deferred tax levies, special assessments, fund transfers, and interest earnings. Deferred tax levies' heduled to be placed on the tax rolls, as needed, total $645,900 at December 31, 1997. NOTE 6 - FLEXIBLE BENEFIT PLAN The City offers a flexible benefit plan. The plan is a "cafeteria plan" under § 125 of the Internal Revenue Code. All employees who meet the eligibility requirements may participate in the plan. To be eligible an employee must be at least 20 years of age and be an employee who is regularly scheduled to work more than 20 hours per week. Eligible employees can elect to participate by contributing pre-tax dollars withheld from payroll checks to the plan for health care and dependent care benefits. Payments are made from the plan to participating employees upon submitting a request for reimbursement of eligible expenses actually incurred by the participant. All assets of the plan arc held by the City. The plan is administered by an independent contract administrator for child care and medical expense reimbursements, and by the City for health insurance premiums. The plan is included in the financial statements as an Expendable Trust Fund. All plan property and income attributable to that property is solely the property of the City, subject to the claims of the City’s general creditors. Participani»’ rights under the plan are equal to those of general creditors of the City in an amount equal to the eligible health care and dependent care expenses incurred by the participants. The City believes that it is unlikely that it will use the assets to satisfy the claims of general creditors in the future. tk CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1997 NOTE 7 - DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANS The City offers its employees deferred compensation plans created in accordance with Internal Revenue Code § 457. The plans, available to all employees, permit them to defer a portion of their salary until future years. The deferred compensation is not available to employees until termination, retirement, death, or unforeseen emergency. During the year ended December 31,1997, the City ’s deferred compensation plan administrators placed all plan assets in trust for the exclusive benefit of the plan participants or their beneficiaries. Consequently, these assets are no longer the property of the City, and the Agency Funds in which the assets had been reported were closed. NOTE 8 - DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS - STATEWIDE A. Plan Description All full-time and certain part-time employees of the City of Orono are covered by defined benefit plans administered by the Public Employees ’ Retirement Association of Minnesota (PERA). PERA administers the Public Employees ’ Retirement Fund (PERF) and the Public Employees ’ Police and Fire Fund (PEPFF) which are cost-sharing, multiple-employer retirement plans. These plans are established and administered in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 353 and 356. PERF members belong to either the Coordinated Plan or the Basic Plan. Coordinated Plan members are covered by Social Security and Basic Plan members are not. All new members must participate in the Coordinated Plan. All police officers, fire fighters, and peace officers who qualify for membership by statute are covered by the PEPFF. PERA provides retirement benefits as well as disability benefits to members, and benefits to survivors upon death of eligible members. Benefits are established by state stamte, and vest after three years of credited service. The defined retirement benefits are based on a member’s highest average salary for any five successive years of allowable service, age, and years of credit at termiiiation of service. Two methods are used to compute benefits for PERF’s Coordinated and Basic Plan members. The retiring member receives the higher of a step-rate benefit accrual formula (Method 1) or a level accrual formul.i (Method 2). Under Method 1, the annuity accrual rate for a Basic Plan member who retires before July 1, 1997 is 2.0% of the average salary for each of the first 10 years of service and 2.5% for each remaining year. The annuity accrual rate for Basic Plan members who retire on or after July 1,1997 is 2.2% or average salary for e,. '• of the first 10 years of service and 2.7% for each remaining year. For a Coordinated Plan member wh > retires before July 1, 1997, the annuity accrual rate is 1.0% of the average salary for each cf the first 10 years and 1.5% for each remaining year. For Coordinated Plan members who retire on or after July 1, 1 >97, the annuity accrual rates increase by 0.2% (to 1.2% of the average salary for each of the first 10 years and 1.7% for each remaining year). Under Method 2, the annuity accrual rate is 2.5% of the average salary for Basic Plan members and 1.5% for Coordinated Plan members who retire before July 1,1997. Annuity accrual rates increase 0.2% for members who retire on or after July 1, 1997. For PEPFF members, the annuity accrual rate is 2.65% for each year of service for members retiring before July 1, 1997. Effective July 1,1997, the annuity accrual rate is increase to 3.0%. For all PEPFF members and for PERF members whose armuity is calculated using Method 1, a full annuity is available when age plus years of service equal 90. A reduced retirement annuity is also available to eligible members seeking early retirement. -43- •. f CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1997 NOTE 8 - DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS - STATEWIDE (CONTINUED) There are different types of annuities available to members upon retirement. A normal annuity is a lifetime annuity that ceases upon the death of the retiree — no survivor annuity is payable. There are also various types of joint and survivor annuity options available which will reduce the monthly normal annuity amount, because the annuity is payable over joint lives. Members may also leave their contributions in the fund upon termination of public service in order to qualify for a deferred annuity at retirement age. Refunds of .ontributions are available at any time to members who leave public service, but before retirement benefits begin. The benefit provisions stated in the previous paragraphs of this section are current provisions and apply to active plan participants. Vested, terminated employees who are entitled to benefits but are not receiving them yet are bound by the provisions in effect at the time they last terminated their public service. PERA issues a publicly available financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information for PERP and PEPFF. That report may be obtained by vriting to PERA, 514 St. Peter Street #200, St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 or by calling (612) 296-7460 or 1-800-652-9026. B. Funding Policy Minnesota Statutes Chapter 353 sets the rates for employer and employee contributions. These statutes are established and amended by the state legislature. The City makf'S annual contributions to the pension plans equal to the amount required by state statutes. PERF Basic Plan members and Coordinated Plan members are required to contribute 8.23% and 4.23%, respectively, of their annual covered salary. PEPFF members are required to contribute 7.60% of their annual covered salary. The City of Orono is required to contribute the following percentages of annual covered payroll: 10.73% for Basic Plan PERF members, 4.48% for Coordinated Plan PERF members, and 11.40% for PEPFF members. The City’s contributions for the years ended December 31,1997, 1996, and 1995 were $141,551, $131,818, and $127,447, respectively, equal to the contractually required contributions for each year as set by statute. NOTE 9 - INDIVIDUAL FUND DISCLOSURES A. Interfund Receivables and Payables at Year-End General Fund Debt Service Fund 1995 Refunding Bonds Capital Project Funds Minnesota State-Aid Streets Construction Permanent Improvement Revolving Interfund Receivables Interfiind Payables $$ 9,215 9,215 - 161,800 161,800 $ 171,015 $ 171,015 *•' I « -44-i I* CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1997 NOTE 9 - INDIVIDUAL FUND DISCLOSURES (CONTINUED) B. Deficit Fund Balance The Minnesota State-Aid Streets Construction Capital Project Fund had a deficit fund balance of $8,962 at December 31, 1997. This deficit will be eliminated through reimbursements of project costs from state-aid construction revenue or transfers from other funds. C. Reservations and Designations of Fund Balances For various reasons, certain funds have a portion of their fund equity reserved or designated for specific purposes. A discussion of each such item as it appears on the Combined Balance Sheet follows. Reservation of Fund Balance ” Reserved for Debt Service - This reserve represents resources which are legally restricted to provide financial resources to pay principal and interest on a specific bond issue. Designated for Unreserved Fund Balances “ Designated for Emergency Contingencies - This amount in the Permanent Improvement Revolving Capital Project Fund represents fund balances which have been designated by the City Council to be segregated as an emergency source of funds. ® Designated for Capital Projects - The amounts in the Permanent Improvement Revolving and 1997 Sewer Construction Capital Project Funds represents fund balance that has been designated for specific road, bridge, stormwater, and sewer improvement projects. ® Designated for Crime Prevention - The amount in the Drug and Felony Forfeiture Special Revenue Fund represents fund balance that has been designated for crime prevention expenditures. ® Designated for Capital Outlay - These amounts represent fund balances which are committed to pay for capital outlay in the Special Revenue Funds. ® Designated for Debt Service - These amounts represent fund balances in the Debt Service Funds which are presently committed to provide financial resources to pay principal and interest on the City’s general obligation bonds. ® Designated for Vacation/Severance Benefits - This amount in the General Fund represents fund balance which has been designated for payment of the estimated long-term liability for vacation and severance benefits. -45- CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1997 NOTE 10 - FUND TRANSFERS The following transfers were made during the year ended December 31, 1997: A. Operating Transfers Funds Transferred From General Fund Special Revenue Fund - Building Capital Outlay Transferred To Special Revenue Fund - Improvement and Equipment Capital Outlay Debt Service Fund - 1991 Public Facilities Revenue Bonds Amount Description $ 95,000 To finance capital outlay expenditures. 130,000 To finance current debt service payments. Capital Project Fund - Capital Project Fund - 1997 Sewer Construction Permanent Improvement Revolving 20,897 To reimburse preliminary project costs for legal and _____ engineering. $ 245,897 B. Residual Equity Transfers Funds Transferred From Transferred To Amount Description General Fund Special Revenue Fund - To open Drug and Felony Drug arid Felony Forfeinire $ 8,347 Forfeiture Fund. < 1 1 ' f * -46- CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1997 NOTE 11 - SEGMENT INFORMATION FOR ENTERPRISE FUNDS Gross profit and operating revenue Depreciation expense Property tax revenues Operating income (loss) Net income Property, plant, and equipment - additions Net working capital Bonds payable Total assets Total equity Water Operating Sewer Operating Golf Course Operating Total $220,622 $638,280 $206,464 $1,065,366 $63,294 $182,434 $11,931 $257,659 $105,631 $2,378 $-$108,009 $(22,667)$(50,709)$54,028 $(19,348) $80,379 $59,527 $69,715 $209,621 $36,294 $197,935 $104,680 $338,909 $181,048 $1,771,525 $217,587 $2,170,160 $660,200 $644,8C0 $—$1,305,000 $2,441,630 $8,124,162 $545,262 $11,111,054 $1,749,047 $7,270,737 $527,825 $9,547,609 NOTE 12 - PROPRIETARY FUNDS ’ CONTRIBUTED CAPITAL This balance represents the cost of property contributed to the Enterprise Funds by the City, less depreciation thereon charged to operations. Changes occurring in this account during the year were as follows: Water Operating Sewer Operating Golf Course Operating Total Balance - beginning of year $ 1,332,030 $ 5,461,377 $ 131,457 $6,924,864 Less depreciation on contributed assets (32.8861 (158.1651 (653)(191,704) Balance - end of year $ 1,299.144 $ 5.303.212 $ 130,804 J 6,733.160 -47- w « CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1997 NOTE 13 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES A. General B. Construction C. Facility I. ease lease, with an option to purchase, continues until February I 2008 OTurnihetTniMtedthrm 1997 was apprOTimately $402!70o ”“”’ Property. The rent expense in Future minimum rental commitments under the lease are as follows: Year Amount 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Thereafter $ 406.903 405,017 406,990 407.755 412,248 2.477.492 $ 4.516.405 NOTE 14 - SUBSEQUENT EVENT 2001. The issue bears an overall interest rate of 4.5362% and has a final maturity of February 1,2M? ' -48- THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK I * \ i i -4 :[ GENERAL FUND The General Fund is the general operating fund of the City. It is used to account for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fond. ♦ ♦-49- •>% CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Exhibit B-1 General Fund Comparative Balance Sheet As of December 31,1997 and 1996 Assets Cash and temporary investments Receivables Accounts Accrued interest Delinquent taxes Delinquent special assessments Contract for deed Due from other governments Prepaid items Deferred charge - assessments on property owned by City Other assets Total assets Liabilities and Fund Equity Liabilities Accounts payable Accrued salaries payable Due to other funds Due to other governments Deferred revenue Contract for deed Delinquent taxes Special assessments Total liabilities Fund equity Fund balance Unreserved Designated for vacation/severance benefits Undesignated Total fund equity Total liabilities and fund equity 1997 1996 $ 1,924,159 $ 1,587,878 4,877 1,265 38,123 77,065 39,112 44,667 5,195 5,195 3,531 5,560 40,249 45,218 —12,847 9,215 12,295 2,666 3,740 $ 2.067.127 $ 1.795.730 $ 57,263 $ 52,842 28,851 23,900 9,215 12,295 139,804 100,185 3,531 5,560 39,112 44,667 5,195 5,195 282,971 244,644 152,262 151,520 1,631,894 1,399,566 1,784,156 1,551,086 $ 2.067.127 $ 1.795.730 i -50- r ft li ( m CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA General Fund Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual (GAAP Basis) Year Ended December 31,1997 (with Comparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended December 31, 1996) •51- Exhibit B-2 it 1997 1996 Over (Under) !Budget Actual Budget Actual Revenue Property taxes S 1,680,980 S 1,687,266 S 6,286 S 1,641,943 Special assessments -44 44 20 I Licenses and permits Licenses 18,500 15,732 (2.768)8,019 Permits 176,500 232,343 55,843 199,258 !Total licenses and permits 195,000 248,075 53,075 207,277 Intergovernmental Federal grants Federal emergency preparedness 4,500 4,000 (500)4,500 Other 30,000 30,000 —— State grants Homestead and agricultural credit aid 254,710 254,710 -254,710 Police town aid 82,000 86.936 4,936 88,283 Local performance aid 8,300 8,429 129 — Police training reimbursement 6,000 5,088 (912)5,159 i Municipal state-aid streets 84,000 84,926 926 85,418 Other 13,235 13,237 2 — County grant - recycling 14,200 16,982 2,782 15,090 Other ———1,500 Total intergovernmental 496,945 504,308 7,363 454,660 r->Charges for services General government 298,550 373,618 75,068 320,726 Public safety 652,040 674,896 22,856 656,165 Total charges for services 950,590 1,048,514 97,924 976,891 U-Fines and forfeits 64,400 83,396 18,996 71,556 Other Interest earned on investments 63,950 77,438 13,488 68.449 —Rents 5,400 5,400 -5,400 Refunds and reimbursements 26.000 62,004 36,004 36,513 Contract for deed - land 3,335 2,030 (1.305)4,464 Miscellaneous 4,240 4.490 250 5,567 Total other 102,925 151,362 48,437 120,393 Total revenue 3,490,840 3,722,965 232,125 3,472,740 f *(continued) * r Exhibit B-2 CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA General Fund Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual (GAAP Basis) (continued) Year Ended December 31,1997 (with ComparaMve Actual Amounts for Year Ended December 31,1996) Expenditures General government Mayor and council 1997 Budget Actual Over (Under) Budget 1996 Actual (continued) -52- I t » t •' Personal services 19,670 19,333 (337)16,063 Other services and charges 32,710 33,042 332 40,457 Total mayor and council 52,380 52,375 (5)56,520 t 1 Administration Personal services 187,255 188,442 1,187 178,144 Supplies 200 403 203 176 Other services and charges 13,250 11,858 (1.392)10,860 Total administration Elections 200,705 200,703 (2)189,180 m (►t Personal services ———4,980 Supplies 340 338 (2)307 Other services and charges 190 185 (5)1,230 Total elections 530 523 (7)6,517 IN Assessing Other services and charges Finance 78,755 78,751 (4)77,000 wm Personal services 147,220 146,955 (265)143,436 Supplies 50 -(50)34 Other services and charges 5,670 5,983 313 5.475 11Total finance 152.940 152,938 (2)148,945 Legal Other services and charges 82,750 82,738 (12)65,260 11 Human services Other services and charges 14,055 14,020 (35)15,351 a i s ' • ' . : • • i I \ t I I • f • CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA General Fund Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual (GAAP Basis) (continued) Year Ended December 3 1, 1 997 (with Comparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended December 31, 1996) Expenditures (continued) General government (continued) Central services Supplies Other services and charges Total central services Total general government Public safety Police protection Personal services Supplies Other services and charges Capital outlay Total police protection Fire protection Contracted fire protection Protective inspection and zoning Personal services Supplies Other services and charges Total protective inspection and zoning Emergency preparedness Supplies Other services and charges Total emergency preparedness -53- Exhibit B-2 jyy/1996 Budget Actual (3ver (Under) Budget Actual 12,600 14,935 2,335 11,197170.230 167,892 (2,338)149.183182,830 182.827 (3)160,380 764,945 764,875 (70)719,153 1.090,700 1,090,674 (26)1,005,34248,950 50,279 1,329 47,073135,560 135,828 268 131,45366,320 64.749 (1.571)43.5181,341,530 1.341,530 —1,227,386 221,060 221.057 (3)198,719 346,760 346,740 (20)289,6381,210 836 (374)1,1309,750 10,133 383 9,497 357,720 357,709 (11)300,265 —1483.690 3,680 (10)1,4443,690 3,680 (10)1,592 (continued) Exhibit B-2 CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA General Fund Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual (GAAP Basis) (continued) Year Ended December 31, 1997 (with Comparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended December 31,1996) 1997 1996 Budget Actual Over (Under) Budget Actiul r - Expenditures (continued) Public safety (continued) Animal control Personal services 11,355 11,352 (3)11,124 Supplies -——33 Other services and charges 780 685 (95)486 Total animal control 12,135 12,037 (98)11,643 Total public safety 1,936,135 1,936,013 (122)1,739,605 Streets Personal services 245,290 246,522 1,232 240,551 Supplies 98,500 107,735 9,235 108,840 Other services and charges 125,230 114,755 (10,475)119,501 Total streets 469,020 469,012 (8)468,892 Parks and recreation Personal services 20,775 16,696 (4,079)22,732 - Supplies 3,000 3,262 262 3,552 Other services and charges 26,530 30,327 3,797 24,858 Total parks and recreation 50,305 50,285 (20)51,142 Recycling Personal services 1,135 234 (901)1,201 t »- Supplies 250 2,125 1,875 — Other services and charges 67,420 66,414 (1,006)67,433 Total recycling 68,805 08,773 (32)68,634 Miscellaneous Engineering 13,220 13,216 (4)16,042 9^ Special services - consulting/police 46,830 46,818 (12)46,497 Contingency 37,605 37,556 (49)302,990 Total miscellaneous 97,655 97,590 (65)365,529 r' Total expenditures 3,386,865 3,386,548 (317) 3,412,955 Excess of revenue over expenditures 103,975 336,417 232,442 59,785 * (continued) -54- f • • r *« i ! I • I « ♦ w I.. Exhibit B-2 CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA General Fund Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual (GAAP Basis) (continued) Year Ended December 31, 1997 (with Comparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended December 31, 1996) Other financing sources (uses) Operating transfers in Operating transfers (out) Total other financing sources (uses) Excess (deficiency) of revenue and other financing sources over expenditures and other financing uses Fund balance Beginning of year Residual equity transfer (out) End of year 1997 1996 Budget Actual Over (Under) Budget Actual (95,000)(95,000) —32,100 (197,500) (95,000)(95,000)—(165,400) $ 8.975 241,417 $ 232.442 (105,615) 1,551,086 (8,347) 1,656,701 S 1.784.156 $ 1,551,086 -55- I r A i * • SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS i j Special Revenue Funds are used to account for revenue derived from speciric revenue sources that are lenally restricted to expenditures for specific purposes. d^vdoprent' acquisition and park Improvemenl and Equipment Capital Ontlay Fund - used to replace non-enteiprise. non-police City equipment. ^ ^ BliUding Capital Outlay Fund - used to partially finance building facilities construction and additions through transfers from the General Fund. Drug and Felony Forfeiture Fund - used to account for proceeds received from seizures relating to drug and felony cnminal activity, donations received for the police department, other appropriate authorized by the City Council, and all authorized related expenditures.revenues i * » • -56. Capital Outlay Outlay Forfeiture 1997 1996 S 365.031 S 2,463,992 S 10,975 S 2,879,094 S 3,000,046 2,269 28,894 36,234 102,412 -—50,000 — S 367.300 S 2.492.886 S 10.975 $ 2.965.328 s 3.102.458 S 212 $ 6,770 —S 14,809 s 28,522 —10,975 10,975 _ 367,088 2,486,116 2,939,544 3,073,936 367,088 2,486,116 10,975 2,950,519 3,073,936 $ 367.300 $ 2,492.886 $ 10.975 $ 2.965.328 $3.102.458 Building Drug and Capital Felony Totals Outlay Forfeiture 1997 19^' s s S 50,000 s 144,297 172,076 177,582 ——12,619 4,272 ——46,170 30,864 —3,432 3.432 3,042 144,297 3.432 284,297 215,760 246 804 1,050 7,765 15.375 —400.828 235.861 15,621 804 401,878 243,626 128,676 2,628 (117,581)(27,866) —20,817 —-95,000 97,500 (130,000)—(130.000)(130.000) (130,000)(14.183)(32,500) (1.324)2,628 (131,764)(60,366) 2,487,440 3,073.936 3.134,302 —8,347 8.347 $ 2.486.116 $ 10.975 $ 2.950.519 S 3.073.936 1997 1996 Budget Actual Over (Under) Budget Actual $ 50,000 $ 50,000 S $ 15,000 9,225 (5.775)16,369 25,000 46,170 21,170 30,864 90,000 105,395 15,395 47,233 217,976 214,001 (3.975)119,639 $1127.976)(108,606)$ 19.370 (72,406) r 11 CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Improvement and Equipment Capital Outlay Fund Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Acnial (GAAP Basis) Year Ended December 31, 1997 (with Comparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended December 31, 1996) Revenue Other Interest earned on investments User fees Total revenue Expenditures Capital outlay General government Administration Finance Central services Public safety Building and zoning Police protection Fire protection Streets Parks and recreation Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenue over expcndinircs Other financing sources Sale of fixed assets Operating transfers in Total other financing sources Excess (deficiency) of revenue and other financing sources over expenditures Fund balance Beginning of year End of year -60- 391,550 Exhibit C-4 1997 1996 Budget Actual Over (Under) Budget Actual $ 18,000 $ 18,554 $ 554 $ 19,390 11,900 12,619 719 4,272 29,900 31,173 1,273 23,662 11,240 11,239 (1)22,498 6,760 6,758 (2)226 2,000 1,873 (127)- 28,390 28,355 (35)7,383 —195 195 41,986 32,240 28,074 (4,166)— 97,650 94,958 (2.692)37,462 ———928 178,280 171,452 (6,828)110,483 (148,380)(140,279)8,101 (86,821) 20,817 20,817 95,000 95,000 —97,500 95,000 115,817 20,817 97,500 $ (53.380)(24,462)$ 2^918 10,679 380L871 S 367.088 S_39J j550 rt> Exhibit C-5 CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Building Capital Outlay Fund Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual (GAAP Basis) Year Ended December 31, 1997 (with Comparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended December 31,1996) 1997 1996 Over -- (Under) Budget Actual Budget Actual • Revenue Other Interest earned on investments $ 140,000 $ 144,297 $ 4,297 S 141,823 Miscellaneous ———3,042 Total revenue 140,000 144,297 4,297 144,865 Expenditures Current ^ - Miscellaneous —246 246 7,765 Capital outlay General government General government buildings 16,095 15,375 (720)5,739 w- Total expenditures 16,095 15,621 (474)13,504 Excess of revenue over expenditures 123,905 128,676 4,771 131,361 Other financing uses ! Operating transfeis (out)(130,000)(130,000)—(130,000) Excess (deficiency) of revenue over expenditures and other financing uses $ (6.095)(1,324)$ 4.771 1,361 Fund balance Beginning of year 2,487,440 2,486,079 End of year $ 2.486,116 S 2.487.440 .61- m I « t.. ii CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Exhibit C-6 Drug and Felony Forfeiture Fund Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual (GAAP Basis) Year Ended December 31,1997 Budget Actual Over (Under) Budget Revenue Other Miscellaneous $ 3,435 $ 3,432 $ Expenditures Current Miscellaneous 810 804 Excess of revenue over expenditures $ 2.625 2,628 $ Fund balance Beginning of year Residual equity transfer in 8,347 End of year S 10.975 -62- ’f” I \ » • t • THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 1 I DEBT SERVICE FUNDS I . -63- MI r CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Debt Service Funds Combining Balance Sheet As of December 31,1997 (with Comparative Totals as of December 31,1996) 1991 -64. 1982 Public 1992 ImproveFacilities Improve- ment Revenue ment Bonds Bonds Bonds Assets i . Cash and temporary investments $ 56,071 $ 137,169 $ 767,772 Cash and investments held by trustee —421,263 - Receivables Accrued interest 9,096 10,619 — Delinquent taxes 31 5,979 540 Delinquent special assessments ——865 Deferred special assessments —495,795 Due from other funds -—— Due from other govenunents 58 1,918 1,583 Total assets S 65.256 $ 576.948 S 1.266.555 * . Liabilities and Fund Balance w Liabilities Accounts payable $$ 1,067 $ Deferred revenue Delinquent taxes 31 5,979 540 Special assessments -—496,660 Special assessments on City property -——’— Total liabilities 31 7,046 497,200 Fund balance Reserved for debt service —421,263 — Unreserved r-' Designated for debt service 65,225 148,639 769,355 Total fund balance 65,225 569,902 769,355 Total liabilities and fund balance $ 65,256 S 576.948 S 1.266.555 * r ^ \ I. ■ i •' E j km Exhibit D-1 1995 1997 Refund-Improve- ing ment Totals Bonds Bonds 1997 1996 S 192,469 S 261,564 $ 1,415,045 $ 1,143,054 ——421,263 413,023 6,022 25,737 42,114 330 —6,880 7,826 3,652 —4,517 9.801 27,100 1,278.966 1,801,861 615,681 9,215 —9,215 12,295 2,067 —6,626 7,809 S 241,855 $ 1,540,530 $ 3.691.144 $ 2.251.603 S $$ 1,067 $ 1,080 330 _6,880 7,826 30,752 1,278,966 1,806,378 625,482 9,215 —9.215 12,295 40,297 1,278,966 1,823,540 646,683 —-421,263 413,023 201,558 261,564 1,446,341 1.191.897 201,558 261,564 1.867.604 1,604,920 $_.241,855 $ 1.540.530 $ 3.691.144 $ 2.251.603 -65- i • 4 I ' 4\ i r CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Debt Service Funds Combining Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Year Ended December 31,1997 (with Comparative Totals for Year Ended December 31,1996) -66- 1982 1991 Public 1992 ImproveFacilities Improve ment Revenue ment Bonds Bonds Bonds Revenue Property taxes Property $ 4,527 $ 224,999 $ 29,988 Penalties and interest ——530 Special assessments 13,927 —104,047 Intergovernmental Homestead and agricultural credit aid —29,963 8,000 Other Interest earned on investments 2,705 28,238 39,873 Miscellaneous 8,832 —— Total revenue 29.991 283,200 182,438 Expenditures Debt service Principal retirement 15,000 200,000 105,000 Interest on bonds 2,250 202,700 85,175 Fiscal agent fees 126 2,135 409 Miscellaneous 140 —2,600 Total expenditures 17,516 ^04,835 193,184 Excess (deficiency) of revenue over expenditures 12,475 (121,635) (10,746) Other financing sources Bond proceeds (net)--- Operating transfers in —130,000 - Total other financing sources -130,000 - Excess (deficiency) of revenue and other financing sources over expenditures 12,475 8,365 (10,746) Fund balance Beginning of year 52.750 561.537 780.101 Residual equity transfers in --- Residual equity transfers (out)--— End of year $ 65,225 $ 569,902 S 769.355 Exhibit D-2 1995 1997 RefundImprove ing ment Totals Bonds Bonds 1997 1996 $ 31,162 $$ 290,676 $ 301,000 ——530 2,28316,745 216,820 351,539 180,556 8,000 -45,963 35,442 10,025 1,759 82,600 70,730 ——8,832 625 65,932 218,579 780,140 590,636 60,000 380,000 300,00013,294 —303,419 313,96037752,782 2,8121,575 6,100 10,415 3,91074,906 6,175 696,616 620,682 (8,974)212,404 83,524 (30,046) —49,160 49,160 ——130,000 130,000 -49,160 179,160 130,000 (8,974)261,564 262,684 99,954 210,532 1.604,920 1,367,973 —-275,241 ••——(138,248) $ 201,558 $ 261.564 S 1.867,604 $ 1,604.920 I 4 h« -67- t ! h ! CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS Capital Project Funds are used to account for financial resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities. Minnesota State-Aid Streets Construction Fund - used to account for state-aid allotments used by the City for improvement projects to designated roads and bridges within the City. Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund - used to account for construction costs prior to obtaining permanent financing. 1997 Sewer Construction Fund - used to account for construction costs of the 1997 North Long Lake and Long Lake Country Club sanitary sewer improvements. Bay Ridge/Hart wood and Brackett ’s Point sanitary sewer improvements, and the Orono Ice Arena sanitary sewer and water improvement projects. -68- I Minnesota State-Aid Streets Construction Permanent Improvement Revolving $ 536 $ 382,501 —>27,360 —1,534 —681 26,730 18,070 —161,800 326,667 1,600 $ 353.933 $ 593.546 $ 623 S 21,873 161,800 173,742 1,534 26,730 18,751 362,895 42,158 325,000 —92,906 (8,962)133,482 (8.962)551,388 $ 353.933 $ 593.546 Exhibit E-] 1997 Sewer Construction $ 314,101 $ 314.101 $ 132,216 132,216 181,885 181,885 1 314.101 Totals 1997 1996 $ 697.138 $ 412,991 27,360 35,497 1,534 611 681 1,322 44,800 55,905 161,800 157,800 328,267 102,359 $ 1.261.580 $ 766.485 S 154,712 $ 117,248 161,800 157,800 173,742 — 1,534 611 45.481 57,227 537,269 332,886 325,000 325,000 274,791 172,906 124,520 (64,307) 724,311 433,599 $ 1.261.580 $ 766.485 1 -70- jjiiiliawtihirtiiiii 'mirtiiliiiii Revenue Property taxes Special assessments Intergovernmental State aid for construction Other Interest earned on investments Miscellaneous Total revenue Expenditures Capital outlay Professional services Construction costs Miscellaneous Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenue over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Bond proceeds (net) Operating transfers in Operating transfers (out) Total other financing sources (uses) Excess of revenue and other financing sources over expenditures and other financing uses Fund balance (deficit) Beginning of year Residual equity transfers (out) End of year r £■ f i. f1 ■ f n- « I »■» Exhibit E-2 1997 Sewer Totals Construction 1997 1996 S $ 84,724 $ 39,410 -15,792 18,521 —329,340 212,440 . 1 w 20,542 41,515 31,312 ——1,663 * - 1 20,542 471,371 303,346 « 278,946 361,781 72,059 —i 1,242,446 1,522,298 119,161 846 1,058 760 1,522,238 1,885,137 191,980 (1,501,696)(1,413,766)111,366 1,704,478 1,704,478 4 —20,897 125,100 (20,897)(20,897) (57,200) 1,683,581 1,704,478 67,900 W 181,885 290,712 179,266 «■»—433,599 391,326 ——(136,993) S 181,885 S 724.311 $ 433.599 -72- THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK f- I I ! \ 4 ! i I • ♦ r* * t n [3 ENTERPRISE FUNDS o"sMds7o'ihfo?hHr^.‘° “““"' Of s=lf-sWorting activities which render servicesg ds to the public. The accounting records are maintained on the accrual basis of accounting. hl« wato\7“" e av^abr'’ Golf Course Operating Fund - used to account for the golf course operation sales and related expenses. -73- Exhibit F-1 CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Enterprise Funds Combining Balance Sheet As of December 31,1997 (with Comparative Totals as of December 31,1996) Golf Water Sewer Course Totals Operating Operating Operating 1997 1996 * Assets — Current assets ♦' • Cash and temporary investments S 296,082 S 1,573,145 S 224,816 S 2,094,043 S 1,930,537 Accounts receivable —309,709 25 309,734 329,950 Accrued interest receivable 3,235 8,453 —11,688 50,722 Delinquent taxes receivable 2,074 38 -2,112 1,924 Delinquent special assessments receivable —15,286 -15,286 18,099 Deferred special assessments, current portion 31,597 13,708 -45,305 45,305 r Due from other governments 1,004 42,553 -43,557 28,612 4i. Inventory --2,410 2,410 2,268 Prepaid items ———374 Total current assets 333,992 1,962,892 227.251 2,524,135 2,407,791 Other assets, less current portion . Deferred special assessments 126,388 54,831 -181,219 226,523 Due from other governments —111,881 -111,881 231,305 1 Total other assets 126,388 166,712 -293,100 457,828 Property, plant, and equipment Land and improvements 57,132 16,654 219,236 293,022 201,763 Buildings and improvements 792,888 31,014 62,257 886,159 839,158 Equipment 77,843 77,352 119,656 274,851 266,664 Distribution/collection system 2,083,535 8,844,035 -10,927,570 10,665,928 Work in progress —17,317 —17,317 86,497 t 3,011,398 8,986,372 401,149 12,398,919 12,060,010 llM» Less accumulated depreciation 1,030,148 2,991,814 83,138 4,105,100 3,847,441 Net property, plant, and equipment 1,981,250 5,994.558 318,011 8,293,819 8,212,569 Total assets $ 2.441.630 $ 8.124.162 S 545.262 S 11.111.054 S 11.078.188 -74- r I • I 4 L I- 11 . II « t « • » f ^'[2 (Mli Exhibit F*1 Water Operating Sewer Operating Golf Course Operating Totals 1997 1996 Liabilities and Fund Equity Current liabilities Accounts payable Salaries and compensated absences payable Accrued interest payable Due to other governments Revenue bonds payable Total current liabilities 10,772 1,492 11,221 2,984 126,475 15,344 2,063 10,959 39,476 123,525 8,629 1,035 152,944 191,367 34,745 4,590 22,180 42,460 250,000 9,664 31,246 9,344 26.134 4,739 245,000 353,975 316,463 Long-term liabilities, less current portion Compensated absences payable Due to other govenunents Revenue bonds payable Deferred credits 5.914 533,725 8.365 49,000 521,275 7.773 22.052 49.000 1,055,000 25,789 1,305,000 Total long-term liabilities 539,639 Oai/|*f 1 O 662,058 7,773 1.209.470 92.948 1,423.737 Total liabilities 692.583 853,425 17,437 1,563,445 1,740,200 f-*Fund equity Contributed capital Retained earnings 1,299.144 5.303,212 130,804 6,733.160 6,924,864 : Unreserved 449.903 1.967.525 397,021 2,814.449 2,413,124 * Total fund equity 1,749.047 7,270.737 527,825 9.547.609 9,337.988 c Total liabilities and fund equity $ 2.441.630 $ 8.124.162 J.__545,262 S 11.111.054 S 11.078,188 -75- r Exhibit F-2 CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Enterprise Funds Combining Statement of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings Year Ended December 31,1997 (with Comparative Totals for Year Ended December 31, 1996) Golf Water Sewer Course Totals • Operating Operating Operating 1997 1996 Sales and cost of sales Sales s s S 21,539 $ 21,539 S 19,163 Cost of sales ——11,762 11,762 11,315 i Gross profit --9,777 9,777 7,848 Operating revenue Metered water sales 217,668 ——217,668 249,504 User charges —636,204 —636,204 619,169 Greens fees ——165,139 165,139 152,947 Equipment rental --31,241 31,241 31,523 OAer 2,954 2,076 307 5,337 4,135 Total operating revenue 220,622 638,280 196,687 1,055,589 1,057,278 Total gross profit and operating revenue 220,622 638,280 206,464 1,065,366 1,065,126 Operating expenses Personal services Salaries and wages 68,794 109,423 65,478 243,695 242,347 Retirement contributions 8,513 13,417 4,666 26,596 25,643 i Health and life insurance contributions 1,366 3,188 3,772 8,326 8,311 Purchased water 10,598 ——10,598 13.092 Sewer disposal charges -274,328 -274,328 318,940 Professional services 9,075 7,006 2,207 18,288 22,375 Operating and maintenance supplies 19,640 7,798 8,758 36,196 38,889 Heat, light, and power 31,738 20,028 2,542 54,308 47.992 1 Depreciation 63,294 182,434 11,931 257,659 257,488 Rent and equipment --7,304 7,304 6,977 Maintenance and repairs 10,667 37,652 11,149 59,468 85,981 Administrative and other expense Administrative charges from General Fund 6,020 17,350 10,610 33,980 33,015 Communications 2,192 2,100 1,643 5,935 4,615 ^ ’ Office supplies 450 208 230 888 595 Printing, publishing. and advertising 505 870 5,600 6,975 7,055 Data processing 27 --27 367 Insurance 7,968 11,988 14,760 34,716 39.177 Other expenses 2,442 1,199 1,786 5,427 7,028 Total operating expenses 243,289 688,989 152,436 1,084,714 1,159,887 • Operating income (loss)(22,667)(50,709)54,028 (19,348) (94.761) «... (continued) .76- j r I rt f ! » 4 I,. ML* CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Exhibit F*2 ~ ... „ Enterprise Funds (with Comparative Totals for Year Ended December 31.1996) Nonoperating revenue (expense) Property tax revenue Inteigovemmenul revenue Interest earned on investments Interest on special assessments Interest income from MCES Amortization of deferred credits Interest expense Revenue bond expense Loss on disposal of assets Total nonoperating revenue (expense) Income before operating transfers Operating transfers Operating transfers in Operating transfers (out) Total operating transfers Net income Credit for depreciation on contributed equity Net increase in retained earnings Retained earnings Beginning of year End of year Water Operating Sewer Operating Golf 105.631 10.128 14.699 (27.330) (82) 2.378 24,807 87.330 11.650 1,313 9,530 (26.692) (80) 103,046 110,236 80,379 59.527 80.379 32,886 59,527 158,165 Course Totals Operating 1997 1996 -108.009 93,566 —24,807 15.687 113.145 117.602 26.349 34.245 1,313 11,160 —9.530 9.531 —(54.022)(82.482) (162)(1.100) —(3.512) 15.687 228,969 179.010 69.715 209.621 84,249 -70.000 —(70.000) - 69.715 209.621 84,249 653 191.704 192,574 113,265 217,692 70.368 401.325 276.823 336.638 ■L2:^^-^33 326.653^ __2,413.124 2.136.301 Aiam UaMl Ajsioji. s ;.«u.44» , ,4m,4 -77- MAr i»i Jiaami- I r CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Exhibit F-3 Enterprise Funds Combining Statement of Cash Flows Year Ended December 31,1997 (with Comparative Totals for Year Ended December 31. 1996) Cash flows from operating activities Operating income (loss) Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities Depreciation Loss on disposal of assets Amortization of revenue bond discount Change in assets and liabilities (Increase) decrease in Accounts receivable Due from other governments Inventory Prepaid items Increase (decrease) in Accounts payable Salaries and compensated absences payable Due to other governments Net cash provided by operating activities Cash flows from capital and related financing activities Taxes collected for revenue bond debt Special assessments for revenue bond debt Intergovernmental grants received Acquisition or construction of capital assets Principal paid on revenue bonds Interest paid on revenue bonds Other charges on revenue bonds Net cash used by capital and related financing activities Water Operating Sewer Operating Golf Course Totals 1997 1996 $ (22,667)S (50,709)S 54,028 S (19,348)S (94.761) 63,294 182,434 11,931 257,659 257,488 (3.512) 10,416 (421) 112 20,241 106,020 262 (25) 193 (142) 20,216 105,792 (142) 374 (41.119) 35,428 21 3,576 543 (2,951)5,907 3,499 (32.791) (4.912) 1,745 (4,402) 84,976 823 (8,491) 86,721 (1.719) (28,599) 37,694 335,871 72.715 446,280 104,428 105,245 46,295 (36,294) (123,945) (29.330) (82) 2,576 28,171 24,807 (197,935) (121,055) (28,646) (80) (104,680) 107,821 74.466 24,807 (338,909) (245,000) (57.976) (162) 92,983 81,231 (106,450) (1,750,000) (104,104) (1.100) (38.111)(292,162)(104,680)(434.953)(1,787.440) (continued) i ' c -78- r*»n t • I CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Enterprise Funds Combining Statement of Cash Flows (continued) Year Ended December 31. 1997 (with Comparative Totals for Year Ended December 31.1996) Exhibit F-3 i\ ■ i Cash flows from investing activities Interest received on investments Cash flows from noncapital flnancing activities Operating transfer from Sewer Fund Operating transfer to Water Fund Net cash provided by noncapital financing activities Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents Beginning of year End of year Cash and cash equivalents Unrestricted cash and temporary investments Water Operating Sewer Operating Golf Course Operating Totals 1997 1996 12,785 123,610 15,784 152,179 159,005 --70,000 —(70 000) 12,368 167,319 (16,181)163,506 (1,524,007) 283.714 1,405.826 240,997 1.930.537 3.454.544 $ 296.082 S 1.573.145 S 224.816 .$ 2.094.043 S 1.930.537 S 296.082 $ 1.573.145 $ 224.816 $ 2.094.043 S .'.930.537 i Supplementary schedule of noncash investing, capital, and financing activities Assets contributed from other funds s _ 5 MCES current value credit applied S 4.594 $i____4.594 $__L803.I89 4.594 1 -79- Exhibit F-4CITY OF ORONO, MlhlNESOTA Water Operating Fund Comparative Balance Sheet As of December 31, 1997 and 1996 1997 1996 S 296,082 $ 283,714 • *■ 3,235 5,892 2,074 1,688 31,597 31,597 1,004 583 —112 -- 333,992 323,586 a— 126,388 157,984 57,132 57,132 792,888 756,594 77,843 77,843 2,083,535 2,083,535 3,011,398 2,975,104 1,030,148 966,854 1,981,250 2,008,250 - $ 2.441.630 S 2.489.820 ( »Exhibit F-4 1997 1996 * *.-4 Liabilities and Fund Equity Current liabilities Accounts payable Salaries and compensated absences payable Accrued interest payable Due to other governments Revenue bonds payable Total current liabilities Long-term liabilities, less current portion Compensated absences payable Revenue bonds payable Total long-term litei'inties Total liabilities Fund equity Contributed capital Retained earnings Unreserved Total fund equity Totui ,^ii«frq)ties and fund equity $ 10,772 $ 10,229 1,492 4,257 11,221 13,221 2,984 1,239 126,475 123,945 152,944 152,891 5,914 8,061 533,725 660,200 539,639 668,261 692,583 821,152 1,299,144 1,332,030 449,903 336,638 1,749,047 1,668,668 J 2.441.630 S 2,489_,,820 t f I 9 -81- i »Exhibit F-4 1997 1996 > ! 1 f Liabilities and Fund Equity I Curre"'/labilities Accounts payable $ 10,772 $ 10,229 —Salaries and compensated absences payable 1,492 4,257 L ^ Accrued interest payable 11,221 13,221 Due to other governments 2,984 1,239 Revenue bonds payable 126,475 123,945 1 Total current liabilities 152,944 152,891 wumw Long-term liabilities, less current portion Compensated absences payable 5,914 8,061 Revenue bonds payable 533,725 660,200 Total long-term liabilities 539,639 668,261 *«w«f Total liabilities 692,583 821,152 Fund equity Contributed capital 1,299,144 1,332,030 •-Retained earnings Unreserved 449,903 336,638 -Total fund equity 1,749,047 1,668,668 r-Total liabilities and fund equity $ 2,441.630 $ 2.489,820 ♦ • ♦ • -81- h - ''4 CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Water Operating Fund Comparative Statement of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings Years Ended December 31,1997 and 1996 Exhibit F-5 1997 1996 Operating revenue Metered water sales Other Total operating revenue Operating expenses Salaries and wages Retirement contributions Health and life insurance contributions Purchased water Professional services Operating and maintenance supplies Heat, light, and power Depieciation Maintenance and repairs Administrative charges from General Fund Communications Office supplies Printing, publishing, and advertising Data processing Insurance Other expenses Total operating expenses Operating income (loss) Nonoperating revenue (expense) Property tax revenue Interest earned on investments Operations Interest on special assessments Interest expense on revenue bonds Revenue bond expense Total nonoperating revenue (expense) Income before operating transfers Operating transfers in Net income Credit for depreciation on contributed equity Net increase in retained earnings Retained earnings Beginning of year End of year $ 217,668 $ 249,504 i 2,954 2,034 220,622 251,538 ♦ • 68,794 75,136 8,513 8,765 •k. 1,366 1,362 10,598 13,092 9,075 3,601 19,640 19,250 31,738 26,759 *- 63,294 64,342 10,667 19,173 » 6,020 5,825 2,192 1,903 •i^ 450 98 * 505 551 27 174 7,968 9,027 2,442 1,126 ■ 243,289 250,184 (22,667)1,354 105,631 90,175 10,128 8,014 14,699 20,249 (27,330)(41,727) (82)(551) 103,046 76,160 80,379 77,514 70,000 r*' 80,379 147,514 32,886 32,886 0 113,265 180,400 9 • 336,638 156,238 $ 449.903 S 336.63 8 -82- r I ( » " 4 *1. t i CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Water Operating Fund Comparative Statement of Cash Flows Years Ended December 31,1997 and 1996 Cash flows from operating activities Operating income (loss) Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities Depreciation Amortization of revenue bond discount Change in assets and liabilities (Increase) decrease in Accounts receivable Due from other governments Prepaid items Increase (decrease) in Accounts payable Salaries and compensated absences payable Due to other governments Net cash provided by operating activities Cash flows from capital and related financing activities 1 axes collected for revenue bond debt Special assessments collected for revenue bond debt Acquisition or construction of capital assets Principal paid on revenue bonds Interest paid on revenue bonds Other charges on revenue bonds Net cash used by capital and related financing activities Cash flows from investing activities Interest received on investments Cash flows form noncapital financing activities Operating transfer from Sewer Fund Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents Beginning of year End of year •83- Exhibit F-6 1996 $ (22.66?)S 1,354 63,294 64,342 5.269 _451 (421)(103) 112 1,288 543 (6,498) (4,912)598 1.745 ^ (2,173) 37,694 64.528 105,245 89,165 46,295 51.846 (36,294) (123,945)(885.327) (29,330)(52,666) _ _ _(82)^ (551) (38.111)(797,533) 12,785 18,055 70.000 12,368 (644,950) 283.714 928,664 S 296.082 t 283,714 • i CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Exhibit F-7 Sewer Operating Fund Comparative Balance Sheet As of December 31,1997 and 1996 Assets Current assets Cash and temporary investments Accounts receivable Accrued interest receivable Delinquent taxes receivable Delinquent special assessments receivable Deferred special assessments, current portion Due from other governments Prepaid items Total current assets Other assets, less current portion Deferred special assessments Due from other governments Total other assets Property, plant, and equipment Land and improvements Buildings and improvements Equipment Distnbution/collection system Work in progress Less accumulated depreciation Net property, plant, and equipment Total assets -84- 1997 1996 S 1,573.145 $ 1,405,826 309,709 329,950 8,453 44,733 38 236 15,286 18,099 13,708 13,708 42,553 27,836 —262 1,962,892 1,840,650 54,831 68,539 111.881 231.305 166,712 299,844 16,654 16,654 31,014 31,014 77,352 71,879 8,844,035 8,582,393 17,317 86,497 8.986,372 8,788.437 2,991.814 2,809.380 5,994.558 5,979.057 $ 8.124.162 $ 8.119.551 # « / i t i < t * 11 I . • < f j » Liabilities and Fund Equity Current liabilities Accounts payable Salaries and compensated absences payable Accrued interest payable Due to other governments Revenue bonds payable Total current liabilities Long-term liabilities, less current portion Compensated absences payable Due to other governments Revenue bonds payable Deferred credits - MCES Total long-term liabilities Total liabilities Fund equity Comributed capital Retained earnings Unreserved Total fund equity Total liabilities and fund equity -85- Exhibit F-7 1997 1996 $ 15,344 2,063 10,959 39,476 123,525 191,367 $ 18,295 4,233 12,913 3,500 121,055 159,996 8,365 49,000 521,275 83.418 662,058 10,597 644,800 92,948 748,345 853,425 908,341 5,303,212 5,461,377 1,967,525 1,749,833 7,270,737 7,211,210 $ 8.124.162 S 8.119.551 CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Sewer Operating Fund Comparative Statement of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings Years Ended December 31,1997 and 1996 Operating revenue User charges Other Total operating revenue Operating expenses Salaries and wages Retirement contributions Health and life insurance contributions Sewer disposal charges Professional services Operating and maintenance supplies Heat, light, and power I>epreciation Maintenance and repairs Administrative charges from General Fund Communications Office supplies Printing, publishing, and advertising Data processing Insurance Other expenses Total operating expenses Operating loss Nonoperatini; revenue (expense) Property tax revenue Intergovernmental revenue Federal emergency preparedness Other grants Interest earned on investments Operations Construction Interest income on special assessments Interest income from MCES Amortization of deferred credits Interest expense on revenue bonds Revenue bond expense Loss on disposal of assets Total nonoperating revenue (expense) Income (loss) before operating transfers Operating transfers (out) Net income (lossl Credit for depreciation on contributed equit)^ Increase in retained earnings Retained earnings Beginning of year End of year -86- Exhibit F-8 1997 1996 S 636,204 ' 619,169 I 2,076 2,066 638,280 621,235 109,423 105,281 13,417 12,354 3,188 3,177 & 274,328 318,940 7,006 15.699 7,798 11.748 20,028 17.141 182,434 184,730 37,652 58,356 17,350 16,840 2,100 1,331 208 283 870 1,108 -193 ■ 11,988 13,257 Wa 1,199 4,607 688,989 765.045 •> (50,709)(143,810) 2,378 3,391 r- Wi* 10.932 — 13,875 - 43.695 51,627 w 43,635 45,388 11,650 13,996 * 1,313 11,160 9,530 9,531 (26,692)(40,755) (80)(549) -(260) 110,236 93,529 59.527 (50.281)- a.(70.000) 59,527 (120,281) 158,165 158,895 217,692 38.614 • — 1.749,833 1.711,219 • $ 1.967.525 $ 1.749.833 1 i CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Sewer Operating Fund Comparative Statement of Cash Flows Years Ended December 31,1997 and 1996 Cash flows from operating activities Operating loss Adjustments to reconcile operating loss to net cash provided (used) by operating activities Depreciation Loss on disposal of assets Amortization of revenue bond discount Change in assets and liabilities (Increase) decrease in Accounts receivable Due from other governments Prepaid items Increase (decrease) in Accounts payable Salaries and compensated absences payable Due to other governments Net cash provided (used) by operating activities Cash flows from capital and related financing activities Taxes collected for revenue bond debt Special assessments collected for revenue bond debt Intergovernmental grants received Acquisition or construction of capital assets Principal paid on revenue bonds Interest paid on revenue bonds Other charges on revenue bonds Net cash used by capital and related financing activities -87- Exhibit F-9 1997 1996 $ (50,709)$ (143,810) 182,434 184,730 —(260) —5,147 20,241 (41,570) 106,020 35,724 262 1,338 (2,951)(27,284) (4,402)(770) 84,976 (26,426) 335,871 (13,181) 2,576 3,818 28,171 29,385 24,807 — (197,935)(86,941) (121,055)(864,673) (28,646)(51,438) (80)(549) (292,162)(970,398) (continued) CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Exhibit F-9 Sewer Operating Fund Comparative Statement of Cash Flows (continued) Years Ended December 31, 1997 and 1996 1997 1996 Cash flows from investing activities Interest received on investments 123,610 122,933 Cash flows from noncapital financing activities Operating transfer to Water Fund Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 167,319 Cash and cash equivalents Beginning of year I.40S.826 End of year Supplementary schedule of noncash investing, capital, and financing activities Assets contributed from other funds MCES current value credit applied -88- (70,000) (930,646) 2,336,472 S_1.573.I4S $ 1.405.826 $ 1.801.793 4.594. S 4.594 4 ncf r M I ’f I I i f 1 i 1! ‘ » 5 i CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Golf Course Operating Fund Comparative Balance Sheet As of December 31, 1997 and 1996 -89- Exhibit F-10 1997 1996 f Assets Current assets Cash and temporary investments S 224,816 $ 240,997 Accounts receivable 25 — tea#Accrued interest receivable —97 Due from other r-" emments —193 —Inventory 2,410 2,268 Total cui'rcm assets 227,251 243,555 Property, plant, and equipment i Land and improvements 219,236 127,977 Buildings and improvements 62,257 51,550 Equipment 119,656 116,942 401,149 296,469 Less accumulated depreciation 83,138 71,207 Net property, plant, and equipment 318,011 225,262 Total assets $ 545.262 $ 468.817 : Liabilities and Fund Equity Current liabilities Accounts payable S 8,629 S 2,722 Salaries and compensated absences payable 1,035 854 -Total current liabilities 9,664 3,576 Long-term liabilities, less current portion Compensated absences payable 7,773 7,131 K-*Total liabilities 17,437 10,707 -Fund equity Contributed capital 130,804 131,457 Retained earnings 397,021 326,653 -Total fiind equity 527,825 458,110 Total liabilities and fund equity _$_5^a262_$ 468.817 I Exhibit F-11 CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Golf Course Operating Fund Comparative Statement of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings Years Ended December 31,1997 and 1996 Sales and cost of sales Sales Cost of sales Gross profit Operating revenue Greens fees Equipment rental Other ToUl operating revenue Total gross profit and operating revenue Operating expenses Salaries and wages Retirement contributions Health and life insurance contributions Professional services Operating and maintenance supplies Heat, light, and power Depreciation Rent and equipment Mainter^nce and repairs Administrative charges from General Fund Communications Office supplies Printing, publishing, and advertising Insurance Other expenses TouI operating expenses Operating income Nonoperating revenue (expense) Interest earned on investments Loss on disposal of assets Total nonoperating revenue (expense) Net income Credit for depreciation o:i contributed equity Increase in retained earnings Retai: :d earnings Beginning of year End of year -90- 1997 1996 $ 21,539 $ 19.163 % 11,762 11,315 9,777 7,848 165,139 152,947 31,241 31,523 307 35 196,687 184,505 % . 206,464 192,353 65,478 61,930 4,666 4,524 r- 3,772 3,772 2,207 3,075 • 8,758 7,891 2,542 4,092 11,931 8,416 . 7,304 6,977 11,149 8,452 10,610 10,350 1,643 1,381 230 214 5,600 5,396 * 14,760 16,893 1,786 1,295 152,436 144,658 9^ 54,028 47,695 15,687 12,573 —(3,252) 15,687 9,321 • 69,715 57,016 653 793 • w 70,368 57,809 326,653 268,844 $ 397.021 S 326,653 1- t , I • ( « »« Exhibit F-12 CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Golf Course Operating Fund Comparative Statement of Cash Flows Years Ended December 31, 1997 and 1996 -91- •1997 1996 M Cash flows from operating activities r Operating income Adjustments to reconcile operating income to $ 54,028 $ 47,695 net cash provided by operating activities Depreciation 11,931 8,416 » ,Loss on disposal of assets —(3,252) Change in assets and liabilities - j (Increase) decrease in Accounts receivable (25)— 1 Due from other governments 193 (193) Inventory (142)21 Prepaid items —950 Increase (decrease) in iI Accounts payable 5,907 991 ! —Salaries and compensated absences payable 823 (1.547)r Net cash provided by operating activities 72,715 53,081 t 1 Cash flows from capital and related financing activities Acquisition of capital assets (104,680)(19,509) Cash flows from investing activities 'q Interest received on investments 15,784 18,017 Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (16,181) 51,589 »• \Cash and cash equivalents i'"Beginning of year 240,997 189,408 End of year $ 224.816 S 240.997 \ Supplementary schedule of noncash investing, capital, and financing activities * f Assets contributed from other funds $$ 1.396 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK U nrtir.faTi>«a«»i r-irawfcfc ■■ r !^ m i» t f * -4 ■ i fl TRUST AND AGENCY FUNDS Trust Funds are used to account for assets held by the City in a trustee capacity. Flexible Benefit Plan Fund - used to account for employee participation in the cafeteria plan created in accordance with Internal Revenue Code § 125. Agency Funds are used to account for assets held by the City in an agent capacity for individuals, private organizations, other governmental units, or other funds. Deferred Compensation Agency Funds - ICMA Fund, Minnesota Supplementai Investment Fund, Great West Life Insurance Company Fund, and USCM/PEBSCO Fund - used to account for employee deferred compensation plans created in accordance with Internal Revenue Code § 457. -92- -f- ■ Exhibit G-I CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Trust and Agency Funds Combining Balance Sheet As of December 31,1997 (with Comparative Totals as of December 31, 1996) Assets Cash and investments held by trustee Liabilities Deferred compensation payable to employees Expendable Trust Agency Totals Flexible Benefit Plan Deferred Compensation Funds 1997 1996 $$$ 925,112 $ 925,112 '* I L J c r -93- r i-4 r? L I CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Exhibit G-2 Flexible Benefit Plan Expendable Trust Fund Comparative Statement of Revenue, Expendinires, and Changes in Fund Balance Years Ended December 31, 1997 and 1996 1997 1996 Revenue Payroll withholdings for Flexible Benefit Plan $ 60,215 $ 58,207 Expenditures Miscellaneous Employee benefits 60,215 58,207 Excess of revenue over expenditures Fund balance Beginning of year End of year S i ■ *1. -94- . ^ CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Agency Funds Combining Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities (continued) Year Ended December 31,1997 Exhibit G-3 Deferred Compenaation Agency Fnnt^ fUSCM/PFRsro rnnrf) Assets Cash and investments held by trustee Liabilities Deferred compensation payable to employees All Ayenev Funds Assets Cash and investments held by trustee Liabilities Deferred compensation payable to employees Balance January 1, Balance 1997 Additions Deductions 1997 S 185.412 $ 102.574 $ 287.986 $ $ 185.412 $ 102.574 $ 287.986 $ $ 925.112 $ 308.813 _$ 1,2.^3.925 $ $ 925.112 $ 308.813 $ 1.233.925 $ i ! .'I -96- i. I t} i •a THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK V,.' m Schedule 1CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTAComparative Schedule of General Fixed Assets by Source December 31, 1997 and 1996 General fixed assets Land and land improvements Buildings and building improvements Equipment Total general fixed assets Investment in general fixed assets by source General Fund after December 31,1984 Special Revenue Funds after December 31,1984 Capital Project Funds after December 31, 1990 Donations after December 31,1984 Years prior to January 1,1985 Total investment in general fixed assets CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTASchedule of General Fixed Assets By Function and Activity December 31,1997 Schedule 2Land and Land Improvements Buildings and Building Improvements 1,999,912 1,999,912 Equipment Total $ 11,058 S 11,058 54,217 54,217 24,476 24,476 2,336 2,336 76,797 76,797 174,097 3,133,854 342,981 3,302,738 389,491 389,491 63,146 63,146 29,155 29,155 481,792 481,792 718,503 1,896,822 153,571 610,720 —353,049 CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Schedule 3 Schedule of Changes in General Fixed Assets 3y Function and Activity Year Ended December 31,1997 Function and Activity General government Council Administration Elections Assessing Finance Central services Total general government Public safety Police Protective inspection and zoning Emergency preparedness Total public safety Streets Parks Other - unclassified Total general fixed assets General Fixed Assets January I, -99- General Fixed Assets December 31, 1997 Additions Deletions 1997 $ 3,128 $ 7,930 $$ 11,058 44,161 12,776 2,720 54,217 24,476 ——24,476 2,336 ——2,336 69,924 6,873 —76,797 3,126,075 7,779 —3,133,854 I, 3,270,100 35,358 2,720 3,302,738 • 345,353 72,499 28,361 389,491 46,561 27,192 10,607 63,146 •• 29,155 —29,155 421,069 99,691 38,968 481,792 1,823,407 118,806 45,391 1,896,822 386,906 225,973 2,159 610,720 353,049 353,049 $ 6,254.531 $ 479.828 $ 89.238 $ 6.645.121 ! • ' • JTfUftkMMW* ■ ■ 11 CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Future Property Tax Levies to Retire Bonds (1) As of December 31, 1997 Schedule 4 t It m H c Year Collectible 1982 Improvement Bonds 1995 Refunding Bonds 1997 Improvement Bonds Total Levies 1998 $ 500 (2)$ 50,000 (3)$$ 50,500 1999 -50,000 50,000 2000 —50,000 —50,000 2001 ——7,000 7,000 2002 ——13,800 13,800 2003 ——20,300 20,300 2004 -—26,600 26,600 2005 ——32,500 32,500 2006 ——38,200 38,200 2007 ——43,500 43,500 2008 —-48,500 48,500 2009 --58,200 58,200 2010 --62,100 62,100 2011 -—70,900 70,900 2012 ——73,800 73,800 $ 500 $ 150.000 $ 495.400 $ 645.900 i - L i: b (1) The levies for these issues are the general obligation property tax levies which are in addition to the amounts levied in the special assessment rolls. Tax levies are placed (as required by law) at 105% of debt service requirements. (2) The City levied $500 for the 1982 Improvement Bonds due to a projected shortfall prior to 1997. The City will continue to monitor the issue and levy additional taxes as required to generate sufficient sources to pay future debt requirements. (3) The City levied $50,000 for the 1995 Refunding Bonds due to the assessment appeals and subsequent reductions of deferred assessments. The City established future taxes to generate sufficient sources to pay future debt requirements as required by law. (4) Additional debt ser\ ice levies are available for other general obligation debt issues on an as-needed basis determined annually. -100- THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK • « ft ft I t » i f > M c • I ! • Statistical Section ical Year Property Taxes Special Assessments Licenses and Permits Intergovernmental Charges for Services 1988 S 1,170,411 S $ 124,334 S 489,319 $ 643,151 1989 1,211,541 -148,564 493,385 685,952 1990 1,637,643 —136,552 135,512 758,369 1991 1,682,260 —81,202 178,901 726,118 1992 1,842,320 327,053 (2)129,365 316,871 781,235 1993 1,818,753 425,408 165,897 497,165 866,034 1994 1,922,775 257,175 147,888 539,226 851,165 1995 1,933,371 174,443 202,195 517,989 928,121 1996 1,945,226 180,576 207,277 490,102 976,891 1997 1,978,472 351,583 248,075 600,271 1,048,514 'i**-'-**** Table 1 mM i . I ■ i Fines and Forfeits Interest Earned on Investments Other Revenue Total $ 140,657 $$ 706,247 $ 3,274,119 125,357 -676,838 3,341,637 108,231 —637,446 3,413,753 72,728 —504,819 3,246,028 62,458 282,582 (2) 72,623 (2 ) 3,814,507 61,491 254,054 71,948 4,160,750 58,158 286,435 170,500 4,233,322 80,610 313,447 148,886 4,299,062 71,556 316,761 90,747 4,279,136 83,396 332,114 144,977 4,787,402 » * • • - • -102- \ CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA General Expenditures by Function (I) Fiscal Year General Government Public Safety Streets Parks and Recreation Unallocated and Other 1988 $ 589,137 $ 1,247,623 $ 344,407 $ 61,582 $ 67,160 % 1989 655,987 1,376,323 494,742 32,961 95,164 1990 683,176 1,419,419 471,420 48,129 106,778 1991 652,105 1,508,485 474,350 44,791 165,228 1992 596,138 1,562,709 463,710 53,590 148,908 1993 656,849 1,609,867 495,983 58,080 152,547 1994 667,018 1,616,087 485,491 55,739 171,729 • 1995 759,673 1,693,420 423,610 50,449 190,524 1996 719,153 1,696,087 468,892 51,142 441,928 1997 764,875 1,871,264 469,012 50,285 167,413 (1) Includes General, Special Revenue, and Debt Service Funds.• • . .1 -103- Tabic 2 ‘ —Capital Debt Outlay Service Total ' :’ »$ 92,198 $ 534,876 $ 2,936,983 131,437 475,520 3,262,134 • [i -- 25?.921 426,393 3,415,236 |i ' 46,147 406,266 3,297,372 —-«164,708 403,209 3,392,972 fri ! wJ 48,483 562,254 3,584,063im201,192 938,99 ’.4,136,247 *__.;1 198,089 706,462 4,022,227 ( t 279,379 620,682 4,277,263 ; ! 1 465,577 696,616 4,485,042 -104- Fiscal Year Collected Certified Tax Levy for Fiscal Period (I) Current Tax Collections (1)(2) Percent of Levy Collected Delinquent Tax Collections (2) Total Collections as a Percent of Current Lew 1988 $ U93.426 $ 1,257,297 97.2 %$ 27,998 MV W J 99.4 % 1989 1,382,690 1,332,632 96.4 30,844 98.6 1990 1,638,246 1,579,616 96.4 41,984 99.0 1991 1,713,541 1,638,621 95.6 37,233 97.8 1992 1,961,381 1,902,394 97.0 39,181 99.0 1993 2,120,835 2,080,775 98.1 68,246 101.3 1994 2,281,570 2,246,902 98.5 53,629 100.8 1995 2,322,145 2,289,584 98.6 32,592 100.0 1996 2,370,992 2,335,759 98.5 26,032 99.6 1997 2,462,303 2,425,313 98.5 42,101 1002 $ 53,658 4.1 % 64,866 4.7 71,166 4.3 86,352 5.0 128,786 6.6 123,136 5.8 81,796 3.6 49,286 2.1 55,028 2.3 49,638 2.0 Taxes Payable Year Real Property Personal Property Fiscal Disparities Adjustment to Assessed Value or Tax Capacity * % Assessed Value or Tax Capacity Estimated Market Value Assessed Value or Tax Capacity Estimated Market Value 1988 $ 105,02U13 $ 431,023,100 $ 1,596,719 S 3,713,300 $ 796,738 - 1989 (2)14,049,094 477,834,580 183,499 3,495,200 119,216 1990 (3)12,568,353 527,348,000 172,131 3,401,800 151,730 ^ • 1991 14,035,873 585,697,300 178,110 3,598,200 164,776 1992 12,922,819 604,793,400 195,919 4,124,600 45,844 * . 1993 11,572,538 625,445,300 182,211 3,876,800 (15,389) 1 1994 12,007,816 654,919,200 183,655 3,992,500 (22,572) 1995 12,780,145 697,660,900 194,020 4,217,800 (62,597) 1996 13,942,213 756,861,400 200,133 4,350,700 (42,026) 1997 14,932,296 810,974,500 202,352 4,399,000 (25,144) r » ^ I 1 .. ^ t • Table 4 Total Assessed Value or Tax Capacity Estimated Market Value Ratio of Total Assessed Value or Tax Capacity to Total Estimated Market Value ^r^apita Valuations Estimated Market Value Assessed Value or Tax Capacity -108- -• $ 107,414,670 $ 434,736,400 24.71 %$ 14,747 $ 59,684 w 14,351,809 481,329,780 2.98 1,945 65,230 12,892,214 530,749,800 2.43 1,787 73,582 14,378,759 589,295,500 2.44 1,969 80,692 w 13,164,582 608,918,000 2.16 1,787 82,677 —11,739,360 629,322,100 1.87 1,602 85,855 —12,168,899 658,911,700 1.85 1,648 89,283 r-'12,911,568 701,878,700 1.84 1,727 93,884 14,100,320 761,212,100 1.85 1,872 101,091 15,159,792 815,373,500 1.86 1,976 106,293 ’vAL k M At ■ . -^r*> - r CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Property Tax Rates - Direct and Overlapping Governments (I) (Per $I ,000 of Assessed Value or Tax Capacity) City of Orono Taxes Payable Year General Fund PIR Fund 1985 Debt Service Fund 1980 Debt Service Fund 1982 Debt Service Fund 1991 Debt Service Fund 1992 Debt Service Fund (3) Water Operating Fund 1988 11.76 .0.28 ••—— • 1989 (2) 9.42 -0.21 —-——— 1990 12.36 -0.27 0.14 --—— 1991 11.43 -0.28 0.12 0.04 -—- 1992 12.02 -0.36 0.12 0.04 1.69 —- 1993 13.26 0.37 0.12 0.04 1.83 0.12 — 1994 13.43 0.35 —0.04 1.75 0.12 0.29 1995 .2.75 0.33 —0.04 1.72 0.14 0.31 1996 11.67 0.28 0.33 -0.03 1.62 0.17 0.64 1997 11.08 0.56 0.20 -0.03 1.48 0.20 0.70 Certain areas of the City are served by other school districts. Property in those areas would be subject to one of the following rates instead of the rate for ISD #278. Beginning with taxes payable in 1989, the terminology for Assessed Valuations and Mill Rates is no longer used. Tax Capacity replaces Assessed Valuations and is determined in the same manner except using smaller percentages for each property class. Tax Extension Rates are determined in a similar manner to Mill Rates in that the tax levy is divided by the tax capacity. General obligation water and sewer revenue bond debt. -109- Taxes Payable Year ISD #276 ISD #277 ISD #284 1988 63.95 57.06 57.38 1989 (2) 58.06 47.92 50.56 •- 1990 52.55 42.33 49.77 1991 55.36 45.78 50.28 1992 64.02 56.13 58.55 1993 74.18 58.97 64.91 1994 76.51 66.98 59.67 1995 76.14 66.44 60.41 1996 76.34 62.31 60.11 r- 1997 78.42 52.15 52.21 Table 5 (3) Sewer Operating Fund 0.27 0.31 Total 12.04 9.63 12.77 11.87 14.23 15.74 16.25 15.60 14.74 14.25 ISO nin School District (1) 59.50 50.01 47.17 52.74 59.80 67.19 65.03 65.72 62.86 62.49 Area Vo-Tech School 1.49 1.22 1.10 1.05 0.51 1.10 0.81 Hennepin County 31.67 27.-.0 27.92 30.11 34.33 35.84 37.44 37.45 37.27 35.51 Metro Council/ Transit 4.05 3.41 3.72 4.11 4.48 4.40 4.42 4.45 5.06 4.93 Other Special Districts 2.28 2.05 2.03 3.39 1.66 2.31 2.15 4.24 3.37 3.05 Total 111.03 93.42 94.71 103.27 115.01 126.58 126.10 127.46 123.30 120.23 Fiscal Year CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Special Assessments Levies and Collections Current Assessments Due Current Assessments Collected Ratio of Current Collections to Amount Due Delinquent Assessments Collected 1988 $ 257,154 $ 216,503 84.2 S 68,506 - 1989 208,158 183,261 88.0 17,604 4.-^ 1990 222,063 198,202 89.3 35,565 1991 228,169 213,418 93.5 14,419 % 1992 200,477 183,375 91.5 18,390 1993 387,230 355,530 91.8 9,338 - 1994 294,073 274,403 93.3 23,295 V. 1995 278,904 258,595 92.7 24,853 1996 271,013 254,524 93.9 28,021 1997 247,867 236,020 95.2 11,162 -III- r 11-^ 1.4 • .» l.’ f. \ * f « I'to Special Assessments Delinquent $ 90,023 61,562 43,766 43,313 54,657 55,507 55,159 45,605 34,417 25,679 Table 6 Total Outstanding Assessments $ 764,234 663,372 735,609 581,048 1,639,996 1,277,078 1,027,451 1 ,200,322 977,831 2,098,864 -112- CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Ratio of Net General Bonded Debt to Assessed Value or Tax Capacity and Net Bonded Debt Per Capita Fiscal Year Population (2) Assessed Value (in 1,000s) Gross Bonded Debt (1) Debt Service Funds Available (I) Net Bonded Debt - 1988 7,284 $ 107,415 $ 1,350,789 $ 1,035,242 S 315,547 1989 7,379 14,352 (4)1,207,220 867,436 339,784 ^-- 1990 7,213 (5)12,892 1,010,710 694,251 316,459 • 1991 7,303 14,379 4,811,035 928,917 3,882,13819927,365 13,165 5,561,340 1,253,423 4,307,917 r *• • 1993 7,330 11,739 5,734,084 1,518,649 4,215,43519947,380 12,169 5,362,830 1,349,726 4,013,104 ^1 > 1995 7,476 12,912 5,142,297 1,361,687 3,780,61019967,530 •14,100 4,989,319 1,597,170 3,392,14919977,671 15,160 5,183,139 1,832,379 3,350,760 Includes bonds recorded in the General Long-Term Debt Account Group. Gross bonded debt has been reduced by Debt Ser\'ice deferred special assessments receivable in order to reflect only tax supported debt burden. For purposes of this analysis, Debt Ser\'ice Funds available do not include individual fund balance amounts in excess of the related individual bond issue amount included in gross bonded debt. Population from Metropolitan Council estimate as of April I, annually. Rating history from Moody Investors Service. Beginning with fiscal year 1989, the terminology for Assessed Valuations is no longer used. Tax Capacity replaces Assessed Valuations and is determined in the same manner except using smaller percentages for each property class. Federal census. The rating for the 1991 Public Facilities Revenue Bonds issued by the City of Orono’s Housing and Redevelopment Authority is Aa, as the City is making lease-purchase payments equal to the armual debt service requirement. While the intent is to continue the annual payments and budget annual appropriations, the City may terminate the lease as provided in the lease-purchase contract. Estimate. -114- Table 8 Ratio of Net Tax Supported Bonded Debt Net Bonded Bonded to Assessed Debt Debt Value Per Capita Rating (3) —0.29 %$ 43.32 Aa 2.37 (4)46.05 Aal 2.45 43.87 Aal —27.00 531.58 Aal 32.72 584.92 Aal (6) ■-*35.91 575.09 Aal (6) 31.08 543.78 Aal (6) 29.28 505.69 Aal (6) 24.06 450.48 Aal (6) 22.10 436.81 Aal (6) CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Ratio of Annual Debt Service Expenditures for General Bonded Debt to Total General Expenditures (I) Table 9 Fiscal Year Principal Interest and Other Total Debt Service Total General Expenditures Ratio of Debt Service to Total General Expenditures 1988 $ 360,000 S 174,876 $ 534,876 $ 2,936,983 18.2 % 1989 325,000 150,520 475,520 3,262,134 14.6 1990 300,000 126,393 426,393 3,415,236 12.5 1991 300,000 106,266 406,266 3,297,372 12.3 1992 155,000 248,209 403,209 3,392,972 11.9 1993 150,000 412,254 562,254 3,584,063 15.7 1994 550,000 388,991 938,991 4,136,247 22.7 1995 (2) 340,000 366,462 706,422 4,022,227 17.6 1996 300,000 320,682 620,682 4,277,263 14.5 1997 380,000 316,616 696,616 4,485,042 15.5 4 (I) Includes General, Special Revenue, and Debt Service Funds. ^995^^^^ 5360,000 of bond principal paid to the refund bond principal from refunding bond proceeds •116- CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Table 10 I ___ Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt Decembers!, 1997 Governmental Unit Gross Debt (1) Sinking Funds Net Debt Net Debt Applicable to Orono Percent Amount Direct debt City of Orono S 5,183,139 $ 1.832,379 $ 3,350,760 100.00 % S 3,350,760 ^erlapping debt School districts No. 278 (Orono)5,405,000 345,590 5,059,410 49.73 2,516,045No. 276 (Minnetonka)58,490,000 20,029,700 38,460,300 0.13 49,998No. 277 (Westonka)13,700,000 1,271,479 12,428,521 24.46 3,040,016No. 284 (Wayzata)113,227,742 6,494,542 106,733,200 1.24 1,323,492 Hennepin County 106,385,000 5,608,602 100,776,398 1.58 1,592,267 Metro council 118,555,000 35,399,127 83,155,873 0.79 656,931 Hennepin Suburban Park District 12,225,000 2,555,472 9,669,528 2.11 204,027 Total overlapping debt 427,987,742 71,704,512 356,283,230 9,382,776 Total direct and overlapping debt $ 433.170.881 S 73.536.891 S 359.633.990 $ 12.733.536 ♦-4 Spno*”"'*''* calculation excludes revenue bonds for all governmental units except the City of -117- i / Water Operating Fund Sewer Operating Fund CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Revenue Bond Coverage - Enterprise Funds Table 11 Fiscal Year Gross Revenues (I) Operating Expenses (2) Net Revenue Available for Debt Service Debt Service Requirements Principal Interest Total Coverage 1989 $ 189,086 S 159,586 $ 29,500 $S 17,917 S 17,917 1.65 1990 265,068 163,271 101,797 —74.975 74.975 1.36 1991 234,843 162,010 72,833 —74.493 74,493 0.98 1992 221,691 171,373 50,318 —74.495 74.495 0.68 1993 165,378 150,154 15,224 88,530 69,931 158,461 0.10 1994 243,421 169,023 74,398 88.533 64,472 153,005 0.49 1995 270,471 178,614 91,857 101,180 58,666 159,846 0.57 1996 369,976 185,842 184,134 885,327 (3)41.727 927,054 0.20 1997 351,080 179,995 171,085 123,945 27.330 151,275 1.13 1989 489,658 299,797 189,861 17,499 17.499 10.85 a —' 1990 583,998 305,980 278,018 72,188 72,188 3.85 1991 613,009 343,230 269,779 —72.755 72,755 3.71 1992 543,887 445,562 98,325 72.756 72.756 1.35 1993 557,999 509,286 48.713 86,470 68,324 154,794 0.31 1994 708,030 502,043 205,987 86,467 62,944 149,411 1.38 1995 746,528 626.651 119,877 98,820 57,296 156,116 0.77 1996 756,328 580,315 176,013 864,673 (4)40.755 905,428 0.19 1997 775,288 506,555 268.733 121,055 26,692 147,747 1.82 (1) Total revenues, including nonoperating revenue. (2) Total operating expenses, net of depreciation. (3) Includes S784,145 principal refunded in 1996. (4) Includes S765,855 principal refunded in 1996. .118- ( -- CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Demographic Statistics Table 12 Fiscal Year 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Population (1) 7,284 7.379 7,213 (5) 7,303 7,365 7,330 7.380 7,476 7,530 * 7,671 Per Capita Income (2) i 21,239 22,584 23,705 25,353 27,m 28,080 29,529 32,130 34,574 36,300 School Enrollment (3) 2,037 2,101 2,175 2,289 2,280 2,275 2,433 2,508 2,646 2,601 Unemployment Rate (4) 3.3 % 3.6 4.1 4.3 4.1 4.2 3.2 2.8 3.0 2.4 »• f • If Source: (1) Metro Council (2) Federal Census Bureau data; Hennepin County average (3) Minnesota Department of Education, as reported by Orono School District No. 278 (4) Minnesota Department of Economic Security; Hennepin County average (5) Federal Census • Estimate -119- r L Fiscal Year 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Commercial Construction (1) Number of Permits Value S 3.920.090 162.700 1,537.750 489.050 5 4 9 13 9 13 322^00 12.300 52.900 500,467 3319.657 855.646 Source: CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Property Value. Construction, and Bank Deposits Residential Construction (1) Number of Permits Value 330 360 333 233 272 300 308 335 375 386 17,416,288 14.283.828 6.641399 14.242.621 20.916.290 16.489.721 20,695.799 18.853.407 20.935.675 Estimated Market Value (2) Industrial/ Conun ercial Residential Non-Taxable S 15,836.267 S 16,208,600 S 393,876,700 S 16.734.000 18,304,100 21.798,200 22,460400 21,656400 21,290,500 22,579400 22.049.000 22,966,600 441,270,880 486,776,000 552,096400 582433.100 599,912,300 608,557.500 675.081.600 734,812.400 788,007.900 20.939.670 20.939.670 20.939.670 20.939.670 20.939.670 Table 13 Bulk Deposits (3) S 25453,000 27.693.000 29.031.945 30.796.880 33.624.000 33489.000 31.923.000 38.819.000 36.389.000 42.227.000 (2) Deputment; Residential includes fanns; Non taxable is valued by the County once every six yeus. (3) As reported to Commercial West by First B>jik of the Lakes. -120- J I I PI it M L L) n f « U Taxpayer CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Principal Taxpayers Type of Business Assessed 1996 Payable 1997 Tax Capacity Table 14 Percent of Total Tax Capacity Washington Scientific Manufacturing $ 128,198 0.85 % Wayzata Country Club Private Club 109,444 0.73 Private Residence Single Family Residence 101,280 0.67 Private Residence Single Family Residence 95,200 0.63 Van Dale, Inc.Manufacturing 70,633 0.47 Private Residence Single Family Residence 66,668 0.44 Private Residence Single Family Residence 64,418 0.43 Otten Brothers Nursery Nursery - Garden Center 63,177 0.42 Private Residence Single Family Residence 49,226 0.33 Private Residence Single Family Residence 49,023 0.33 $ 797.267 5.30 % -121- Date of Incoiporation Form of government Area Miles of streets City Private State and County Number of street lights Fire protection Number of cities providing contracted fire coverage Police protection Number of stations Number of police officers Full-time Part-time Number of cities served Education Attendance centers Number of students Water and sewer operations Number of connections Water Sewer CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Table 15 Miscellaneous Statistics December 31, 1997 December 17,1954; effective January 1, 1955 Optional Plan “A”; Council-Administrator 24.5 square miles; 50% is open water or marshland 45.83 15.42 29.28 1 16 3 4 4 2.601 873 1,854 Recreation and culture Number of parks and nature preserves Number of swimming beaches 14 with 78.85 total acres 4 with 6.08 total acres Employees Classified scrvice/full-time Part-time/seasonal 41 17 -122- r 1 * « « CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Tax Capacity, Tax Levies, and Tax Extension Rates Table 16 Collectible in -1998 1997 1996 Tax capacity Real property S 14,938,885 $15,009,193 $13,942,213mmPersonal property 175,312 202,352 200,133 Fiscal disparities contribution (304,815)(336,726)(324,685) Fiscal disparities distribution 280,428 284,973 282,659 Nwi Total tax capacity S 15.089.810 S 15.159.792 14.100.320 Tax levies by County Auditor (I) General Fund s 1,750,000 $1,680,980 S 1,647,940 PIR Fund 54,480 85,500 40,000 Debt Service Funds 1995 (1985) Refunding Bonds 35,000 30,000 46,000 1982 Improvement Bonds —4,500 4,500 1991 Public Facilities Bonds 235,000 225,000 228,400 1992 Improvement Bonds 35,000 30,000 24,000 *-1995 (1989) Refunding Revenue Bonds 105,650 105,650 90,000IHit#1997 Improvement Bonds 10,000 —— 0^ Total tax levies $2,225.130 $2.161.630 $2.080.840 Tax extension rates by County Auditor General Fund 11.573 %11.082 %11.674 % PIR Fund 0.361 0.564 0.284 Debt Service Funds mm 1995 (1985) Refunding Bonds 0.231 0.198 0.326 1982 Improvement B''~ds 0.030 0.032 1991 Public Facilities Bonds 1.555 1.483 1.618 1992 Improvement Bonds 0.231 0.198 0.170 1995 (1989) Revenue Bonds 0.699 0.696 0.639 mm 1997 Improvement Bonds 0.066 —— n Total tax extension rates 14.716 %14.251 %14.743 % (I) Tax levies include the state paid Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid (HACA). -123- THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK i r I ♦: 5 4 MOaOBI ^ ‘ AMMmnr<ir"w>^^trp=,n '^rncoMr I®*' ^ inwiiond I M<^MONiS&je SCOijRA. PRINCIPALS KENNETH W MALLOY. CPA THOMAS M MONTAGUE. CPA THOMAS A KARNOWSKt. CPA PAUL A RAOOSEVICH. CPA WILLIAM J LAUER. CPA INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE AND ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS City Council and Residents City of Orono Orono, Minnesota * I We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the City of Orono as of and for the year ended December 31, 1997, and have issued our report thereon dated May 15, 1998. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Compliance As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether City of Orono’s general purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards . Internal Control Over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit, we considered the City of Orono’s internal control over financial reporting in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control over financial reporting. Our consideration of the internal control over financial reporting would not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control over financial reporting that might be material weaknesses. A material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We noted no matters involving the internal control over financial reporting and its operation that we consider to be material weaknesses. This report is intended for the information of the City Council and management of the City of Orono, the cognizant audit agency, and other federal agencies. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. CCMT IFICD 410 PARK NATIONAL BAf« BUILDING WAYZATA BOULEVARD MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA SS4I6 TtltPtONE 61ZM6 04Z4 Tt lCfAx ritZ M‘) ()f>69 -124- gR|NCIPALS KENNETH W MALLOY. CPA THOMAS M MONTAGUE. CPA THOMAS A KARNOWSKI. CPA PAUL A RADOSEVICH. CPA WILLIAM J LAUER. CPA independent AUDITOR’S RH PQR t on COMPT Tampk mTH MINNESOTA STATE T a WS AND RFni n ATTnxTc City Council and Residents City of Orono Orono, Minnesota k' to financial standards applicable United States, and the provisionT^t the Minnesotl l Comptroller General of the promulgated by the Legal ^^n^Pl»ance Audit Guide for Local Gnv.m.T]°Tt audit included such tests of the accounting records andTuch § 6.65. Accordingly, the necessaiy in the circumstances. ® ^ ® ^ auditing procedures as we considered ...........I covers five main categories of indebtedness, and claims and disbnrfements. Onf;Xlld'a~ and conditionnrapplSriegIi*“prOT^ 'except'a?'de°*^^T"■«’«■«tnaterialtenns recommendations. Further, for the items not tested basedononr a"H^f^ schedule of findings and nothmg came to our attention ,o indicate tha. ,he a,y bad noromplierv^uSfe'i'?;^^^^ co^feMt a'tdit ’wncy.t'd ote “f ‘Jn City of Orono, the distribution is not limited. ^ a matter of public record and its 0 m ^ May 15, 1998 ccr^Tirir r» _____lo ACCOOfsl T /VrsITSl 410 fHMK national BAf^K BUILDtNQ 535J WAV/ATA OOUl t VAMD MlNNtAPOtlS MlNNfSOTA f>?>416 TtirPtK>Nt 612 M5 04;?4 TELtFAM 6l2S4bOf>69 -125- CITY OF ORONOSchedule of Findings and Recommendations Year Ended December 31,1997 This schedule summarizes findings and recommendations relating to compliance with Minnesota Statutes and other internal control and compliance findings. The auditor, Malloy, Montague, Kamowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A., is responsible for providing the information under the heading "Finding and Recommendations." The City of Orono is responsible for providing the information under the heading "Management’s Response." Minnesota Statutes § 471.345 requires that the City retain bids on file. For several projects tested, the unsuccessful bids were not on file. 1 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BL ANK j 1 t u CITY OF ORONO Schedule of Findings and Recommendations (continued) Year Ended December 31,1997 FINDING AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Finding Minnesota Statutes § 1 18A.04 requires the City to provide investment brokers a written statement of investment restrictions each year prior to investing with that broker. The broker is required to acknowledge in writing the receipt of the investment restrictions and agree to handle the City’s account in accordance with them. The City did not obtain this certificate for any of its broKers in 1997. 2. Questioned Costs Not applicable. 3. Current Year vs. Prior Year This is a current year finding. 4. Recommendation We recommend that the City obtain the required written acknowledgment from all brokers prior to investing with then.. MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSE The City will send out the required notification to all brokers with which it invests. Finance department personnel will assure that the required acknowledgment is received from all brokers prior to investing in the future. -127- THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK i • • % * , 0 ^ ^ .«- 4-:.-'^ -■ r I ? PRINCIPALS g^^S£uE r^iADosevS^ KENNETH W MALLOY. CPA THOMAS M MONTAGUE. CPA THOMAS A KARNOWSKI. CPA PAUL A RAOOSEVICH. CPA WILLIAM J LAUER. CPA To the City Council City of Orono Orono, Minnesota We have prepared this management report in conjunction with our audit of the City’s financial records for the year ending December 31,1997. The purpose of this report is to communicate information relevant to city finances in Mirmesota and to provide comments resulting from our audit process. We have organized this report into the following sections: City Finance in Mirmesota Financial Trends and Conditions of Your City Accounting and Repotting Comments Accounting and Auditing Updates Formal Required Communications We would be pleased to further discuss any of the information contained in this report or any other concerns that you would like us to address. We would also like to express our thanks for the courtesy and assistance extended to us during the course of our audit. ! f May 15. 1998 ct M r ir ir rj r*tvWii It: At:c;c_>uTM T /Ktst r» 410 HAHK national BANK BUHOlNti SJ5J WAV/ATA aOULfc VAHO MiNNrAPOUS MINNESOTA bM 16 Tl lFPMONF 612 54S 0424 TFUFAX 612 54SOM9 'j'.*^ ifti Jik .1/f r < ( • 4 ♦ » t t ( < » I C ity Finance in Minnesota Just two years ago. Minnesota cities, school “J* orthe'^SUw*'since tto tShe Stai reductions in state aids, due to the have primarily been has incurred budget surpluses amounting o i Minnesota property taxpayers, but to taxpayers through rebates, credits, or other types of tax relie . The following is .brief summary of the 1997 legislative issues and changes relating to city government finance in Minnesota. Property Tax Reform - The Legislature implemented a number of initiatives aimed at providing various forms of property tax relief and reform. L ria« rates were compressed for several classifications of property including residential homestead, exis^ne chsses CommerciaUlndustrial property which will spread levies :ate for market- (C/I) properties benefitted from some of . S housing will now be treated as a rate apartments was ,^'5 j^J^^ereset^^ t"d no^mS^^^ ' future. • Education Homestead Credit - ^ The H’th: »ot r^qmred to ftle an application to receive the credit. 0 Property tox rebate - Minnwota ^ rw^ttefc^nstituted property It is claimed on 1997 income tax returns that are filed in 1 . Oenera, educat,on leyv reduction measures as discussed are taken into account. • Limited market value - The maximum'^“^‘^^7ly!'^r ‘’SX7th^^ value or one-fourth of the difference. -1- C ity Finance in Minnesota t ♦ *. I • \ i Just two years ago. Minnesota cities, school districts, and counties were faced with the likelihood of large reductions in state aids, due to the deteriorating financial condition of the State. Since that time, the State incurred budget surpluses amounting to billions of dollars. Thus far, these surpluses have primarily been used to implement property tax reform initiatives. This has been great for Minnesota property taxpayers, but municipalities haven ’t received a significant benefit fiom these windfalls. Every indication is that the current 1998 legislature will continue the trend of compressing property tax class rates, implementing levy limits, adding significant tax increment restrictions and penalties, and returning excess funds collected directly back to taxpayers through rebates, credits, or other types of tax relief The following is a brief summary of the 1997 legislative issues and changes relating to city government finance in Minnesota. Property Tax Reform - The Legislanire implemented a number of initiatives aimed at providing various forms of property tax relief and reform. “ Class rate changes - Class rates were compressed for several classifications of property including residential homestead, commercial-industrial, apartments, and seasonal recreation property which will spread levies more evenly across existing classes. Commercial/Industrial (C/I) properties benefitted fi-om some of the largest reductions while the class rate for market- rate apartments was also decreased and certain low-income housing will now be treated as a single classification. In addition, target c lass rates were set for commercial-industrial, apartment, and nonhomestead residential single rental unit property to further reduce those class rates in the future. " Education Homestead Credit - An education homestead credit providing each homestead property with a credit equal to 32% of the property ’s general education tax was established. The credit is limited to S225 per homestead. The credit is deducted by the County Auditor at the time the property tax statements are determined so that homeowners are not required to file an application to receive the credit. ° Property tax rebate - Minnesota homeowners will receive a 20% rebate of their 1997 property taxes paid, while renters will receive 18% of the portion of their rent that constituted property tax payments (about 3.6% of the total rent paid). There is no maximum on the rebate amount. It is claimed on 1997 income tax returns that are filed in 1998. ® General education levy reduction - The statewide general education levy was reduced by $93,000,000 per year for taxes payable in 1998 and subsequent years. This basically increased the state ’s share of education funding from 60% to 65% of the total school levy. The fiscal year 1999 le\7 is expected to require a rate of 35.5% as compared to a rate of 37.4% for fiscal year 1998. This estimate will likely be even lower as a result of the additional property tax reform measures as discussed are taken into account. ° Limited market value - The maximum amount that a qualifying property owner s market value can change from one year to the next has been changed from 10% or one-third of the difference between the current assessment and the preceding assessment to 10% of the preceding year s value or one-fourth of the difference. Property' tax abatement ~ Local governments are allowed to abate their own tax on a particular property if its expected benefit at least equals the cost to the city and finds that doing so is in the public interest (because it will preserve tax base, provide jobs, redevelop blighted areas, etc.). Senior Citizen Deferrals - Taxpayers over the age of 65 can defer a portion of their property tax burden if they’ve lived in their homes for 15 years and their total annual household income does not exceed 530,000. Senior citizens can, for taxes payable in 1999, defer an amount up to their total property taxes minus 5% of their total household income, not to exceed an aggregate tax amount of 75% of the property s market value. A lien will be placed on the property payable when the bouse is sold, the owner dies, or discontinues the deferment, or the property no longer qualifies as a homestead. Levy Limits and Tax Truth - Temporary levy limits on counties and cities of more than 2,500 population were implemented for two years. The Commissioner of Revenue determines the levy limit base for each county and municipality, using 1997 figures weighted for inflation and population increases. With certain exceptions, property taxes within that jurisdiction are limited to the base figure, minus the amount of general purpose aids provided by the state. Communities also need to provide more specific budget information in newspaper advertisements pertaining to public hearings of property tax matters. Tax Increment Financing - A new law requires development authorities to conduct physical, on-site inspections of properties being considered for TIF action. In addition, the law imposes new restrictions on the uses of TIF money, and adopts explicit definitions aimed at tightening the use of TIF districts. Municipal Bankruptcy Allowed - Cities and towns facing financial meltdown may now file a petition seeking Chapter 9 bankruptcy protection under a new Minnesota law. Bankruptcies filed under Chapter 9 allow municipalities to reorganize their debt payments to make them more manageable. In addition to accepting the arrangement for lower payments, creditors also may lower their interest rates on the outstanding balance. Emergency Services Fees - A new- law allows towns to charge emergency service recipients for the cost of providing fire, rescue, medical, and related services. The law also provides a process for the collection of delinquent payments from those receiving the services. In the case of property owners, the emergency service fee may be added to the property taxes of the service recipients. Budget Reserve Account - The Legislature established priorities for future forecasted revenue surpluses in November of odd-numbered years. After ensuring that the budget reserve account is at 5522 million, 60% of any additional amounts will be deposited into a property tax reform account and 40% will be deposited in the General Fund as an unrestricted balance. The Governor will then make recommendations to the Legislature for use of the money in me property tax reform account, but the money can only be used for: a) compressing property class rates, b) increasing state education aids to reduce property taxes, c) increasing the state share of education funding to 70%, d) increasing the education homestead credit, or e) increasing the property tax refund. Sales Tax Exemptions - The Legislature implemented several sales tax exemptions which relate to cities. Effective July 1, 1997 and thereafter, the purchase of petroleum products to fuel city fire apparatus including support vehicles, marked police patrols and ambulances are exempt from the sales tax. Certain search devices used by firefighters have also been added to the iist of exempt items for fire fighting equipment. -2- Statewide for Year I'ndinR IX*cember ^1.C ity of Oronc 2.5(M).|0.0t)0 I0.000.20.(PO 20.000.100.000 1995 1996 1997 Property taxes 24.3 %22.2 %27.1 %41 J%43 J %39^ % Tax increments 7.6 10.3 10.3 Other taxes 0.6 1.3 2.9 Special assessments 0.0 0.0 9.7 4.0 4.4 7.0 Licenses and permits 3.0 2.0 3.K 4.3 4.5 4.7 Intergovernmental 34.5 3.3.5 23.1 18.3 15.3 17.7 Charges lor serv'ices 7.5 7.1 7.3 19.7 21.3 19.9 Other 13.S 13.7 I5.K 12.4 II.2 II.5 Total revenue 100.0 %100.0 %MiO.O %100.0 %100.0 %100.0 % Property values within cities experienced strong growth increasing 5.9% in 1996 and 7.4% in 1997 statewide. This growth results from both new construction and increases in existing property values. In comparison, the City of Orono ’s market value increased by 8.5% in 1996 and 7.1% in 1997. St3t6wid6 ChSDQB If! Markst Values and Tax Capacities (within Cities) Changes in Taxes Payable from 1996 to 1997 Tax Capacities and Rates Tax capacity is considered the actual base available for taxation. It is calculated by applying the state’s property classification system to each property ’s market value. As an example, for residential homestead property, the first S72.000 (S75.000 for taxes collectible in 1998) of market value iias a tax capacity of • 0% Raics expressed as a percentage of net tax capacity Average City Tax Rale 19%1997 Average County __ Tax Rale 1997 Average School Ta.x Rate 1996 1996 1997 Average Special Taxing Disirict Tax Rate 1996 1997 All cities statewide City of Oronu Governmental Expenditure Trends Due to the differences in cities and the services they provide, it is very difficult to compare allocation of service expenditures to individual cities. However, for your information, we have provided a four-year statewide trend which portrays the typical level of expenditures by function for cities over 2 500 in population and a similar comparison to the City of Orono’s expenditures. City of Ornno F.xpcndilures (excluding debt principal) General government i^iblic safety • Streets and highways Sanitation Health Libraries Parks and recreation I IRA and economic development Airports and transit Interest and fiscal charges Miscellaneous expenditures Capital outlay fotal expenditures IW3 1994 1995 1996 1995 1996 1997 11.3%1 1.0 %11.4 %11.9 %19.0 •/.17.0 %13.4 % 23.3 23.4 22.7 23.9 38.6 41.7 333 21.9 23.9 23.8 23.6 26.0 14.6 15.5 1.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 1.6 1.6 1.1 1.0 10 1.0 2.0 2.4 2.1 _ 8.5 9.1 >a f,3.3 7J 4.4 12.5 10.5 13.^—_ 0.4 0.8 1.0 I..I mm _ 8 7 8.6 7.3 7.1 8.0 7.6 5.33.9 4.1 2.6 1.8 3J 4.1 1.6 4.9 4.7 4.3 4.x 0.2 6.1 25.4 100.0%100.0%i00.()%100.0%100.0 %100.0 %IINI.0% Thw City of Orono s public safety expenditures are a fairly high percentage of total spending due pnmanly to the cost of services provided to surrounding cities. These costs are offset by corresponding revenue which is included in charges for services. increased more than SI.879.000 from 1996. This increase is due to the 1997 Sewer Construction Capital Project Fu.rd expenditures i >r sewer constniction. -5- Tax Capacities and Rates Tax capacity is considered the actual base available for taxation. It is calculated by applying the state’s property classification system to each property ’s market value. As an example, for residential homestead property, the first S72.000 (S75.000 for taxes collectible in 1998) of market value has a tax capacity of 1.0% and the remaining value has a tax capacity of 2.0% (1.85% for taxes collectible in 1998). Each property classification has a different calculation and uses different rates. Although it is impossible to consider every aspect and variable of local government spending, average tax rates are often used as a benchmark. Raios expressed as a percentage of net tax capacity Average City Average County lax Rate __fax Rate 10% 1907 1006 1907 Average School Tax Rate 1006 1997 Average Special Taxing District Tax Rate 1996 1997 All cities statewide City of Orono 26.4 14.7 26.1 14.3 36.8 37J 35.7 35.5 63.3 60.4 62.9 58.9 4.9 8.4 4.5 8.0 Governmental Expenditure Trends Due to the differences in cities and the services they provide, it is very difficult to compare allocation of service expenditures to individual cities. However, for your information, we have provided a four-year statewide trend which portrays the typical level of expenditures by function for cities over 2,500 in population and a similar comparison to the City of Orono’s expenditures. Citv of Orono 1993 1994 1995 1996 1995 1996 1997 F,xpcndiiures (excluding debt principal) (iencral government 11.3%11.0 %11.4 %11.9 %19.0 %17.0 %13.4 % Ihiblic safely *23.3 23 4 22.7 23.9 38.6 41.7 33 J Streets and highways 21.9 23.9 23.8 23.6 26.0 14.6 15.5 Sanitation 1.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 1.6 1.6 1.1 1 lealth 1.0 10 1.0 ——mm --Libraries 2.0 2.4 2.1 - M M Parks and recreation 8.5 9.1 >•> f.3.3 7J 4.4 IIRA and economic development 12.5 10.5 I3.i "* Airports and transit 0.4 o.x 1.0 t.ii Interest and fiscal charges 8.7 8.6 7.3 7.1 8.0 7.6 5.3 Miscellaneous expenditures 3.9 4.1 2.6 1.8 3J 4.1 1.6 Capital outlay 4.9 4.7 4.3 48 0.2 6.1 25.4 Total expenditures 100.0%100.0%iOO.O 'll.100.0%100.0 %IIMI.O %1(NI.0% * The City of Orono’s public safety expenditures are a fairly high percentage of total spending due primarily to the cost of services provided to surrounding cities. These costs are offset by corresponding revenue which is included in charges for services. Capital outlay expenditures for 1997 incre.ised more than $1,879,000 from 1996. This increase is due to the 1997 Sewer Construction Capital Project Fur d expenditures i 'r sewer construction. -S- Financial Trends and C onditions of the C ity of Orono General Fund The City’s General Fund accounts for the financial activity of the basic services provided to the cotmnunitv D0l1ce"a'!!d'r ">'S fliftl are the administration and finance of the municipal operatloT police and fire protection, protective inspection and zoning, and street maintenance ^following graph shows the financial position of the General Fund over the last ten yeara Fund balance General Fund Financial Position Years Ended December 31 1968 1969 1990 1991 1992 1993 1984 1995 1996 1997 Revenue Fund balance Cash balance The General Fund had an excess of revenue over expenditures and other financing sources (uses) of $241417 oui 01NV5 UU during 1997, compared with net transfers out of $165,400 during 1996 This decrease was pnmanly due ot».e one-time transfer of funds in 1996 to the Permanent Improvement Revolving FrndTr ^ management plan and potential stormwater runoff correcttor.s The the prTiioufyeL ' >nvestments balance was 51,924,159 at December 31,1997, increasing 2 1.2% from balances in 1989 reOects the planned accumulation and tran-tfei of funds to finance a portion of the City ’s facilities construction. -6- Financial Trends and C onditions of the C ity of Orono geneilvlhjnd The City ’s General Fund accounts for the financial activity of the basic services provided to the community. The primary services included within this fund are the administration and finance ofthe municipal operation, police and fire protection, protective inspection and zoning, and street maintenance. The following graph shows the financial position of the General Fund over the last ten years. Fund balance and cash balance are typically used as indicators of financial health or equity, while annual revenue is often used to measure the size of the operation. General Fund Financial Position Years Ended December 31 1988 1969 I960 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Revenue Fund balance Cash balance The General Fund had an excess of revenue over expenditures and other financing sources (uses) of S241,417 in 1997, increasing the total fund balance to $1,784,156 at December 31, 1997. The City had net transfers out of $95 ^00 during 1997, compared with net transfers out of $165,400 during 1996. This decrease was primarily due to tKe one-time transfer of funds in 1996 to the Permanent Improvement Revolving Frnd for the purpose of funding a stormwater management plan and potential stormwater runoff corrections. The General Fund cash and investments balance was 51,924,159 at December 31, 1997, increasing 21.2% from the previous year. The significant drop in cash and fund balances in 1989 reflects the planned accumulation and tranrfei of funds to finance a portion of the City ’s facilities construction. -6- A key aspect in determining a sufficient level of fund balance relates to the corresponding cash flow. This IS particularly important because of the high and low cash flow points throughout the year caused by the timing of tax and state revenues. The graph below shows that while the cash balance in the General Fund fluctuated significantly, a positive cash position was maintained throughout the entire year. General Fund Cash & Investment Flow Month-End Balances for 1997,1996, and 1995 1997 1996 1995 The following chart reflects the City’s General Fund reliance on its revenue sources for 1997. General Fund Revenue By Source State 122% Fines 2 2% Licenses & permits 67% Taxes 45.3% All Other 5.4% Charges for services 28 2% ‘1 ti li' i'f"'i* E* ii. K" Im '" exceeded the budgeted amount by S232,125 or approximately 6.6% from .ho Xropm^IS;. t experienced by Minnesota cities over the past few years is decreases or minimal increases m state aids. As previously mentioned, the improved financial resources of the state have not been used to incre^e aid to cities. However, this is an improvement from the cutbacks in state aid that had been expected Md^ot^ 'mprovement of the State’s financial condition. This trend does force a higher reliance on taxes and other sources to fund the natural increase in costs over time. This also places a greater emphasis for other govemmen^l funds to be self supporting and Enterprise Funds to be profitable in order to absorb overhead cost, or subsidize general operations. The City of Orono has been successful in not having to increase General Fund taxes in recent years. The following graph presents the City’s General Fund revenues by source in the past few years The graph reflects the City s reliance on property taxes, which provided about 45.3% ofGeneral Fund revenue in 1997 The graph also shows the increase in "other" revenue sources in 1997, which relates to the increase in permit fees and charges for services as discussed above. ^ General Fund Revenue By Source Years Ended December 31 1500 ^ 1000 -4- 500 1991 1992 1993 1994 Taxes State All Other 1995 1996 1997 -8- r I - The following graphs illustrate the components of the City’s Geneial Fund spending for 1997. General Fund Expenditures By Function Public safety 57.2% General govt. 226% Recycling 2 0% Parks 1.5% Streets 138% Alt other 2.9% Total General Fund expenditures for 1997 were $3,386,548, which represents a decrease of $26,407 or 0.8% over 1996. This decrease was primarily due to the $259,000 purchase of property on Highway 12 in 1996. General Fund expenditures were held under budget in every department for 1997. The following graph shows General Fund expenditure trends in recent years. General Fund Expenditures By Function Years Ended December 31 1500 1000 500 I li IL \\ L L "■i 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 General govt. Streets Public safety Parks/recycling/all other -9- M 1 -t tm«. ■ a ai Enterprise Funds The Enterprise Funds comprise a considerable portion of the City ’s activities. As the graph below illustrates, golf revenues have remained fairly stable over the past several years. The sewer revenues continued to rise due to rate increases which were effective during 1997, 1996, and 1995. Enterprise Funds Operating Revenue Years Ended December 31 700 600 300 100 MriaEiMjaaM 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Water Golf course Sewer t.1 -10- t i r. ■ f . ----- p^>.'- V; ^ 'v- 1 Water Operating Fund The following table presents five years of comparative operating results for the City’s Water Operating Fund: Water \w 1904 1995 1996 1997 1 Metered water sales s 151.7V8 S 190 208 s 220,848 S 249,504 $217.668 Total operating revenue s 155,126 S 202,446 s 223,638 S 251,538 S 220,622 Total operating expenses (198,527)(231,518)(243.378)(250,184) (243.289) Operating income (loss) (43,401)(29,072) (19,740)1,354 (22.667) Nonoperating revenue 10,252 40,975 47,894 118,438 130.458 Nonoperating expenses (70.143)(64.691)(58,871)(42,278)(27.412) Operating transfers in 142.088 -—70.000 _ Net income (loss)s 38,796 s (52,788)s (30.717)s 147,514 s 80.379 .I>epreci*i* ron on contributed assets charged —'to operations s 33,329 s .34,872 $32,886 s 32.886 s 32.886 - Net income (loss) —as a percentage of operating revenue 25.0%(26.1)%(13.7)%58.6%36.4% Statewide average •5.4%10.8%12.2% 15.3%N/A • Per report of the State Auditor on Revenues, Expenditures, and Debt of Minnesota Cities over 2,500 in population. During 1997, water sales decreased S31,836 or 12.8% from the 1996 amounts, due mainly to the tool and wet summer. Water Operating Fund expenses decreased 2.8% or S6,895 from the prior year. As a result, the Water Operating Fund experienced a net income of $80,379 which increased retained earnings to $449,903. We have also indicated the amount of depreciation expense on contributed assets which is included in operating expenses. These are assets that were paid for by other funds which typically v.ere financed by special assessments • taxes. In some cases, it is not the intent of the City to entirely recover this depreciation through user charges. -II- Sf.wer Operating Fund The following table presents five years of comparative operating results for the City’s Sewer Operating Fund: I' Sewer User charges Total operating revenue Total operating expenses Operating toss Nonoperating revenue Nonoperating expenses Net operating transfers in (out) Net income (loss) Depreciation on contributed assets charged to operations Net income (loss) as a percentage of operating revenue Vv,♦ Per report of the Slate Auditor on Revenue, Expenditures, and Debt of Minnesota Cities over 2,500 in population. Sewer revenue increased 2.8% in l‘>9?, mainly due to an increase in sewer rates. For the first time in five years, the Sewer Fund showed net income. The nonoperating revenue earned by the fund is comprised of mostly interest earned on investments of S87.330 and intergovernmental revenue of $24,807. The investments are for future debt service, operations, and construction expenses, therefore, it will be important for the City to continue to monitor its sewer rates in order to finance annual operating expenses. Golf C ourse Operating Fund The following table presents five years of comparative operating results for the City’s Golf Course Operating Fund: Golf Course Gross profit from sales Total operating revenue Total operating expenses Operating income Nonoperating revenue Nonoperating expenses Net income Operating income as a percentage of operating revenue Statewide average * 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 $5,750 S 8.349 S 7.261 S 7.848 S 9.777 136.620 169.934 166.673 184.505 196.687 (123.616)(130.461)(142.170)(144,658)(152.436) 18,754 47,822 31.764 47.695 54.028 4.581 5.582 8.150 12.573 15,687 —(8.774)—(3.252) s 23.335 S 44.630 $39.914 S 57.016 S 69.715 Depreciation on contributed assets charged to operations S 254 709 793 13.7%28.1%19.1% 3.5%5.4%8.3% 25.9% N/A 653 27.5% N/A * Per report of the State Auditor on Revenue, Expenditures, and Debt of Minnesota Cities over 2,500 in population. As the preceding table illustrates, the Golf Course Operating Fund continues to be quite profitable, with operating margins well in excess of the statewide average for municipal golf course operations. Golf Course revenues increased due to an Increase in fees for 1997. The City’s Golf Course Operating Fund’s profits have remained fairly consistent and have resulted in a healthy retained earnings balance of $397,021 as of December 31, 1997. -13- A ccounting and R eporting C omments AUDIT Timing and Efficiency We hav^een asked by the City to provide suggestions on how the audit can be completed earlier in the tuture. The timing of audit fieldwork is dependant upon the completion of City Staff work. The better prep^ed “ entny is for its audit, the more efficient the audit will be. Another benefit of being prepared is that there should be fewer interruptions of client staff. The quicker an audit takes place, the b^er a client IS able to stay current with the next fiscal year. ioo?"T K fcompleted on May 15, 1998 compared with the prior year of »h« fi ’ V <*®>ay this year resulted mainly from the timing of personnel changes within the finance department. We have compiled the following sugge.stions for discussion purposes: Fixed assets could be updated on a quarterly basis, so that at year-end only a review of the additions and disposals needs to be completed. Payroll PERA schedules could be updated when payroll is done so that at the end of the year the annual report needed for the footnote disclosure has been finalized. for^y review ^ attached checklist to ensure that all required information is kept on file Update the trial balance for any budget modifications during the year on a timely basis. A file could be kept to include the annual broker certificates and collateral changes and authorizations. ^ Update the insurance carrier/coverage forms as new insurance is awarded during the year. Record accrued wages and expenses after the first payroll is done in the next fiscal year. Also we y^i^) experience to record accrued vacation (used within 60 days of Update investment activity on a monthly basis, rather than trying to account for this at year-end. Review process for utility billing to see if the accumulation of data needed to finaiiy/. the receivables and revenues can be completed closer to year-end. In order to implement these ideas, the City should consider having a planning meeting for the purpose of assigning persormel with specific responsibilities and deadlines for the audit. This meeting could take place a month before the end of the fiscal year. Remember that some of these suggestions are more unique to this year s situation, some have been addressed and implemented and others are just general suggestions We add^essS^ suggestions are helpful and may even give insight as to others areas which were not specifically -14- Broker N otification Minnesota Statutes § 118A.04 requires the City to provide brokers with a written statement of investment restrictions each year prior to investing with that broker. The broker is required to acknowledge in writing the receipt of the restrictions and agree to handle the City’s account in accordance with them. For all brokers used by the City in 1997, no written acknowledgment was received from the brokers. The City is aware of this requirement and your staff has indicated they will establish procedures to ensure compliance in the future. elimination of deferred Compensation agency funds In previous years, the City has reported the assets of its deferred compensation (IRS Code § 457) plans in several Agency Funds. The plans assets were solely the property of the City, subject to the claims of its general creditors. The participants rights were equal to those of the City’s general creditors in an amount equal to thi fair market value of the participants deferred account. The laws governing these plans were changed in 1996 to require that all assets of the plans be held in trust for the exclusive benefit of the participants and their beneficiaries. Existing plans such as yours were required to comply with this requirement by January 1, 1999. During 1997, the City’s plan administrators made the necessary changes to comply with this requirement. Consequently, these assets are no longer the property of the City, and the Deferred Compensation Agency Funds have been closed. BIDS Minnesota Statutes § 471.345 requires that the City retain bids on file for all successful and unsuccessful bidders. For several bids tested this statute was not complied with. We recommend that the City implemeiR proceduies to ensure that this statute is followed in the future. -15- Accounting and A uditing U pdates GASB Reporting Model Project For a number of years, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) has been working on developing a new financial reporting model for state and local governments. The project is still not complete, and will have an implementation period of several years once it has been finalized. However, due to the magnitude of changes this project may bring about, and the potential record keeping consequences to local governmental units, wc want to keep our clients informed of the most recent developments. Early in 1997, the GASB issued an exposure draft of their proposed revisions to the basic financial statements. Some of the key aspects of this proposal include: Mandatory inclusion of a "Management’s Discussion and Analysis" section in the financial statements, to include key financial information and analysis fix>m management of the current year operating results. Dual perspective reporting, where financial information would be presented on both the traditional fund perspective and fiom an "entity-wide" perspective. An additional layer of reporting added on top of the traditional ftmd level reporting. These entity-wide statements would present financial information for all activities of the government on a full accrual basis, aggregated by governmental and business-type activities. At the entity-wide level, capital assets (including infrastructure assets) are required to be reported, along with a provision for depreciation. This would require governmental units to establish fixed asset records. All long-term liabilities would be reported within the funds at the entity-wide level. Currently, implementation for the reporting model is projected to be effective for years beginning after June 15, 2000, with the r^orting provisions for infrastructure assets effective for periods beginning after June 15, 2003. These are just a few of the changes. The GASB is working on a number of other projects in conjunction with the reporting model that will also make significant changes, including a study of ail footnote disclosures. Investment V aluation The Governmental Accounting Standards Board also issued Statement No. 31, "Accounting and Financial Reporting for Certain Investments and for External Investment Pools." The statement establishes fair value standards for governmental entities investments in interest-earning investment contracts, external investment pools, open-end mutual funds, debt securities, and equity or equity-related securities with readily determinable fair values. Governmental entities will be required to report investments at fair (market) value on their financial statements, except for certain money market investments purchased with a remaining maturity of one year or less. The statement also changes revenue recognition, as all investment income, including changes in the fair value of investments, will be reported as revenue in the operating statement! The provisions of this statement are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 1997. -16- Y ear 2000 Planning Basically every organization, whether a city, a school, a non-profit, or a commercial company is facine the same year 2000 problem that has been making headlines for the past several years In a nutshell the oroblem Minnesot^ the problem could affect numerous records, information programs, and operating systems Since ' T'T'' ^°“plete shutdown of inZSrof^d oper!^^ ^rtems necess^ for the runmng of and preparation of financial information for the City we want to ioin in the groups of advisors telling their clients to prepare sooner rather than later to en««tfl’ that day toiav operations are not significantly impacted by this problem. ^ Formal Required C ommunicationsStatement on Auditing Standards No. 61, "Communication With Audit Committees," requires the auditor to ensure that certain matters related to the conduct of an audit are communicated to those who have responsibility for oversight of the financial reporting process. The following constitutes our communication of such matters. The auditor 's R esponsibility Under Generally A ccepted auditing Standards Our audit, conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, is designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. These financial statements are the responsibility of management and it is our responsibility to express an opinion on these a/Huicial statements based on our audit results. Significant A ccounting Policies There were no changes in significant accounting policies or their application during the year audited. Significant audit A djustments Our audit of the 1997 financial statements resulted in no audit adjustments (except for the normal year-end accrual entries) which we considered significant enough to be recorded by the City to prevent the financial statements from being misleading. We recognize that for management purposes, the City maintains its accounting records primarily using the cash basis during the year. Other Matters Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 also requires communications to the committee in the following areas; “ Accounting estimates and management judgments Other information in documents containing audited financial statements * Disagreements with management ° Consultations with other accountants Major issues discussed with management prior to retention as auditors * Difficulties encountered in performing the audit During our audit, we did not encounter any circumstances and we are unaware of any items in any of these areas which require discussion with those who have responsibility for oversight of the financial reporting process. This report is intended solely for the information and use of those who have responsibility for oversight of the financial reporting process. -18- COUNCIL MEETING JUL 2 7 1998 efTVOfG RONQ H ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 13,1998 ROLL The Council met on the above mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor Gabriel Jabbour, Council Members J. Diann Goetten, Charles Kelley, Barbara Peterson and Richard Flint. Representing Staff were City Administrator Ron Moorse, City Attorney Tom Barrett, Senior Planning Coordinator Michael Gaffron, Planner/Zoning Administrator Elizabeth Van Zomeren, Public Services Director Greg Gappa, City Engineer Tom Kellogg and Recorder Jamie Gemar. Mayor Jabbour called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. CONSENT AGENDA (##1) APPROVE/AMEND . Items 4,11,12, and 14 were added to the Consent Agenda. Item 17 was removed from the consent agenda. Peterson moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (*#2) REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 22,1998 Peterson moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of June 22,1998. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#3) SPECIAL MEETING OF JUNE 29,1998 Peterson moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting of June 29,1998. Vote: Ayes S, Nays 0. • PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS Park Commissioner Susan Wilson was present. Wilson stated that during a meeting with a neighborhood group for Dickey Park, they came up with some informal ideas. The Park Commission would now like to request that Dahlgren Shardlow Uban provide a couple of designs for Dickey Park to the City. Shardlow designed French Creek Preserve which was successful. Mayor Jabbour questioned if the American Indians had been consulted. Wilson stated that Sherokee Isle had met with them, and basically discussed names. Mayor Jabbour asked if there was any part of the park that is of significant importance to the American Indians which they wish not to be disturbed. Wilson stated this was not proposed as an active park, but mostly for landscaping. Kelley moved, Flint seconded, to authorize the Park Board to spend up to SI,000.00 for plans. Vote: 5 Ayes, 0 Nays. i r ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 13,1998 PLANTMING COMMISSION COMMENTS William Stoddard of the Planning Commission had no comments. PUBLIC COMMENTS None ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (*#4) #2308 BROOK PARK REALTY, 3760 SHORELINE DRIVE - PRD & CLASS III PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION The Brook Park Realty application had been tabled at the June 29, 1998 regular City Council meeting due to the imtiation of litigation by the applicant There was no action taken at the July 13, 1998 meeting due to continuing litigation. (#5) #2358 RANDY & MARIE STAFFANSON, POINT ROAD - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #4108 Marie Staffanson was present. Van Zomeren stated the application is to construct a new 24'x26' garage in the same location as the old garage which was destroyed by fire. The applicant is requesting a 6.16' side yard setback from the property line, and also to allow a 31.75% hardcover variance in the 75-250' setback area to restore the garage. Staff renotified the neighborhood, as directed by Council, and received no comments. Staffanson had no comment. Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to adopt Resolution #4108 granting variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subd. 5 (B) and Section 10.22, Subd. 2 to allow construction of a new 24'x26* garage in the same location as the previous garage that was destroyed by fire for the property located at 1422 Park Drive. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. r ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 13,1998 (#6) #2361 WILLIAM AND L.WAYNE YAEGER. 310 BIG ISLAND - VARIANCES . RESOLUTION #4109 vAKiANCtS Mr. and Mrs. Yaeger were present. Kelley moved, FUnt seconded, lo adopt Resolution # 4109 granting approval for the *"'*** **’*“*"**'****■ N»y» 0- Mayor Jabbour Bruce Schmidt was present on behalf of Richard and Kathy Kyle. Kelley questioned when the home was originally built and when the hardcover closest to the lake was put in. Nfc Schmidt replied that the home was built in the 50's, and he was unsure when the hardcover was added. Goetten stated that even though hardcover is being removed, she was concerned about 25% hardcover m the 0-75 ’ where the City allows 0%. Mayor Jabboir questioned the last dwumentation the City had on the property to show what was OTgmally conforming or not conforming. Mayor Jabbour expressed concern for trading hard that was not legally allowed in the beginning for a second story structure.cover Kelley was dso concerned with adding more mass (the bulk of the second story addition). He also questioned if the "all rock" area to the south of the garage was to be removed. Van Zomeren noted that it was not shown as being removed. re "PPOfWnity Resumed after discussion of item # 9 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 13,1998 (U7) #2380 Bruce Schmidt on Behalf of Richard and Kathy Kyle, 1140 Tonkawa Road - continued Van Zomeren reported she had found a survey dated 1960 in the City files which does not help in determining hardcover. Permit records show that in 1982 a 22'x34' garage section was added with no additional hardcover calculations done. In 1987, a final inspection notice indicated that everything was fine, and owner was to contact the City regarding deck construction. She was unsure which deck was referenced as there was no drawing. In May, 1987 a letter was written to Mr. Kyle indicating that a deck had been constructed without a permit. There is no indication of any follow up. The garage was added with permits. In 1992, bedrooms were added above the garage with no variances required. It is unclear which deck was built in 1987 without a permit, and what happened to the deck! Mayor Jabbour stated that he assumed that if the City coiresponded with Kyle, Kyle would have responded to the City and taken care of the deck. Van Zomeren noted that they are taking out part of a deck, but the deck off the second floor is probably not the deck in question. Mayor Jabbour questioned if the "all rock" area behind the garage will be removed. Van Zomeren stated that they are willing to remove all of the gravel driveway, which is approximately 1,000 s.f. Mayor Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution #4110 to permit a second story addition to the existing residence with the revision of hardcover percentages to reflect the elimination of the rock driveway. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. The Council directed staff to develop options for controlling the height of structures to address concerns regarding increased massing of structures on the lakeshore. (#8) JOINT USE DOCK LICENSES - RESOLUTIONS #4111 THROUGH #4120 Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to adopt Resolutions #4111 through #4120, directing Staff to issue joint use dock licenses to Big Island Inc., Board of Governors for Big Island Veteran's Camp, Forest Arms Country Club Addition Homeowners Association Inc., Fox Hill Homeowners Association, Minnetonka Power Squadron, 3155 North Shore Drive/3185 North Shore Drive/1406 Bohns Point Road, Pheasant Lawn Homeowners Association, Sandy Beach Place, 460/500/550 Tonkawa Road, and Walters Port Maintenance and Improvement Association for the period of January 1,1998 to December 31,1998. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Mayor Jabbour abstained. r ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 13,1998 (#9) KELLY COVE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION - JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE Austin Evans of2497 Kelly Avenue and John Kupfer of2503 Kelly Avenue were present for this application. Gaffron reported that since about 1979 the Navarre Cove Homeowners Association, which is comprised of six twinhome units, has shared docks located on Outlot A of the Subdivision of Navarre Cove. There is a total of six slips on three docks, which have been approved since 1979. Recently the City Council approved the demolition of the duplex at 2505/2507 Kelly Avenue, which would continue to use their docks on Outlot A. The property owner is attempting to sell this lot as a single family lot. If successful, the joint dock for the other 4 duplex units could be relocated to the commons outlot. Then Outlot A could become legally combined with Lot 3 of Navarre Cove and become a single family dock system. The four umts of duplexes are then totally separated from the single family residence. This proposal would be to put in a four slip dock system on Outlot A, Kelly Cove. Gaffron stated he had talked with the LMCD and they have no objections. Outlot A, Kelly Cove has in excess of200' along the shoreline which would allow 4 slips, when the standard is 50 ’ per slip. Staff recommends approval to allow the conversion of a six unit joint use dock to a four unit joint use dock design, and to approve the location as proposed on Outlot A, Kelly Cove, along with some Code options. The joint use dock license standards allow Council to call a public hearing if Council feels it is appropriate, especially if Council feels there is a possible negative impact on the lagoon. The property owners have talked with neighbors. In staffs opinion, the proposed dock location will have little, if any, impact on the use of the lagoon. Staff requested further direction from Council to draff the appropriate resolution. Evans stated that this area was originally platted with a wetland easement, but is not wetlands. Mayor Jabbour voiced his frustration at being asked to change the Zoning Code to accommodate the duplex at 2505/2507 Kelly Avenue, and now smgle family residential is being considered. Jabbour noted there are restrictions on the size and location of boats in the outlot. Mayor Jabbour suggested staff work within the parameters of the outlot and transfer the covenant to Outlot A, Kelly Cove. He also suggested a development agreement with the owner of2505/2507 Kelly Avenue (Mr. Hoyt) that would indicate no further duplex rights would be allowed, with the property to be used as single family residential. Evans stated that he was present to apply for four dock uses on Outlot A, Kelly Cove and felt it unfortimate that Mr. Hoyt was not in attendance to represent his own i.ssues. continued ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 13,1998 (#9) Kelly Cove Homeowners Association - Joint Use Dock License - Kelley questioned if there is a covenant that limits the number and the size of boats. Mayor Jabbour replied that there is a covenant on the Outlot A. Navarre Cove .ha. .h. i.. of boats, and the boat size is limited by setbacks For the first 50' a i O' v • number side. Mayor Jabbour questioned theW o/SitlorA Gaffron replied that it is exactly 80' in width. Mayor Jabbour stated that 6 boats could be located within 40' if you go 100' out from the property. Gaffron agreed with Mayor Jabbour regarding the activities, but was unaware of a covenant. &v Ifr Lr.hf T«*Pondedy from the side is required since they are not going to be out 100'. Kelley questioned if there is an easement to Outlot A. Navarre Cove. He also questioned is the resolution creating Outlot A, Kelly Cove prohibited direct access to the lake. ^ . He felt the City had the nght, as part of the licensing, to limit the boat slip dimensions. AelSafsl^'’ City would want to limit Kelley suggested the Oty abandon Outlot A, Navarre Cove and combine it with Lot 3 Navarre Sve ;^^i;™itrons. ' ™ Kelly Mayor Jabbour slated that Outlot A, Kelly Cove already existed. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 13,1998 m Kelly Cove Homeowners Association - Joint Use Dock Litcense - continued on which the homeowners are two boats even though he has the right to four boat*: 1 ^ suggested limiting the use to transfer of the four slips from Outlot A, Navatie Covi to OutoT^eil J suggested allowing the never exceed four. ’-'utiot A, Kelly Cove, providing they will on the lakeside than the lago^nlaf has more access replied there 'eet'e™3- Oef&m ^.<1 let Kelh, «„d Mayor Jabbour replied that only six veiy small boats are allowed as nart of thf» cKh* • • u done with a former Council. Mavor Jahhrmr fi»if tu ♦ \/ ff subdivision that was undisturbed as a unique habitat. the lagoon as well, arerenting slips all over the lake, and Van Nest was alfefd w^b anything. People rented out. The LMCD allows rental of docks hnttb n that they would become owner could have up to twrbrtfblnTi^; L . "°t allow dock rental. An registered to the owner. ^ ^ “P boats provided they are S’d™““°"'‘' ** *« the lag oon was 50' or 60’ at the hi.,.,,*... dre «d. .rcto re, Khll, crecn-re. an option to speak before any changes were made. ^ needed to be noufied, to be given ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 13,1998 (»9) Kelly Cove Homeowners Association - Joint Use Dock License - continued Mayor Jabbour for some consensus before a public hearing would be called. He asked if the possibility of a duplex on Lot 3, Navarre Cove be eliminated. Kelley added that Outlot A, Navarre Cove should also be combined with Lot 3. Will* 111 11^ gfflira itiir^ti jiitHLiiTrrri rtJTTilil ninrii MfTltJMrail iijiriTii WlMtl r^sUfiliT^ OR(WO CITY COUNCIL MEETING minutes for JULY 13,1998 Mayor/Council Jteporl - continued Because of the locaUon of theLw Highway 12 CoiridH! '^'‘‘"“<‘*5'. July 8. fKihty will need to be relocated. Flint suggLed the City Maintenance Jr."”Public Works facUire^M, Til »f Wayzata to added the offer should also be extended to the cfty JfToi^ L^e concurred with Flint and was designed to ahow for*^^JjSon Works facility Mayor JabtorwoXt^recXXo^^^^^ Administrators, and und County Road 6 projects and any Rock and sand is scheduled to be down on the whole^Md b“ A hT first coat of pavement down by nud-Septemto lie r September and the with accesses due to the rain. No complaint were meurding the difficulty complaints regarding tree removal. ^ received about grading, but there were some ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 13,1998 ENGINEER REPORT (#10) NAVARRE WATER TREATMENT PLANT UPGRADE preparation .f proposed B. SCHEDULE ASSESSMENT HEARING - RESOLUTION #4122 cap Js »« “S'sscd according to their sewer use, with a l!l!i****li “‘^'^***’ Peterson seconded, to adopt Resolution #4121 declaring the cost to be assessed rehahm#*«”^ Preparation of proposed assessment for Navarre Water Treatment Plant assessment :;5«”.1t,X«V'’oZr‘ aCsTw 7m m 7M o rrir* o “"“'"""s • p”""* '■“™8 the NavarU Water Tre!:™;.. “ “'sTaro." (*#11) REQUEST FOR PAYMENT #7 - SEWER PROJECT BRACKETTS POINT/BAY RIDGE SANITARY to Ih7amrnt7f $27648 “7"'*'^’''•PP™'’* P»y««n« «7 to Barbarossa & Sons, Poin^rPU^rarl; Ay!; i»proven.ents in the Brachem I . ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING minutes for JULY 13,1998 Kct payment #9. NORTH LONG LAKE SANITARY SEWER CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (#13) PURCHASE OF CIVIL DEFENSE SIRENS rbarossa & Sons, sewer improvements for the North are not with radio ay area, and the He suggested a location on stated the« is cove^ge to the south, but it may be possible to move the location farther to Moorse stated that coverage could be discussed with the City of Independence. “•* o»»o emergency Nays 0. Eqmpment Outlay Fund, and to amend the 199S budgets. Ayes 5, (*«4) FEDERAL DISASTER ASSISTANCE - RESOLUTION #4123 execution of ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 13,1998 (#15) SAGE HILL PARK ACCESS - RESOLUTION #4124 Moorse reported on the provision of access to the park area. Fairview Covenant Church is agreeable to an arrangement under which the City would vacate the existing 10 ’ wide alleyway right-of-way that runs through the middle of the Church property in exchange for alternate right-of-way for an access to the park area; and under which the City would have use of the Church property east of County Road 19 for park uses for a period of approximately fifteen years, with the condition that the City maintain the property and overlay the main Church parking lot. The Church has requested the City adopt a resolution setting out its position regarding this arrangement. Barrett stated that if the City was to vacate the alley, they would need a public hearing In the resolution under "NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED", the wording "approve the arrangement with the Fairview Covenant Church for the provision of access to the Saga Hill area as outlined above, and does also" should be struck from the resolution. Councilmember Flint indicated the City's first choice for a long-term solution would be the purchase of the Church property. Mayor Jabbour asked Mr. Peterson if the wording in the resolution reflected the arrangement they had discussed together. Mr. Peterson concurred. Mr. Peterson asked whether the neighbors to the east of the proposed access road had been notified of this plan. Mayor Jabbour indicated that, to this point, no arrangement has been firm enough to warrant notification. Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to approve Resolution #4124, with the amended language, regarding an arrangement with the Fairview Covenant Church for access to the Saga Hill Park area. Ayes 5, nays 0. Dwight Affeldt expressed concern about a future parking lot in the park being secluded and difiBcult to police. He asked if there would be police coverage for the parking lot. Mayor Jabbour stated that there would be alternative options for access to the 30 acre parcel for the r ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 13,1998 (*16) LICENSES Peterson moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the following license: Special Event Permit Rick Recker Start from Hackberry Park to Willow Drive, south to Brown Road, north to Orchard Avenue, west to Holbrook Park Com Days 4 Mile Road Run August 9,1998 11:00 a.m.- noon Bob Carlson 500 Hunter Pass Parade of Homes September 12 - September 27,1998 Calvary Memorial Church 2420 Dunwoody Avenue Family Carnival July 24,1998, 5:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. July 25,1998,10:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. RESIDENTIAL KENNEL Tris Strudle Klohn 4455 North Shore Drive Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#17) BILLS Peterson moved, Goetten seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Mayor Jabbour abstained CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT Attorney Barrett requested an Executive Session to discuss pending litigations ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 13,1998 ADJOURNMENT Mayor Jabbour moved, Kelley seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 9:00 p.m. Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk I. I fCm *4/£i Cur,m I V gi / / «>♦ 1 /V. i O “ S m \s m 1_ J ■ 1 f 1 0 • ® I TOk I ;2 r 1 m Z V =r-/^ K -to KJ K} ^ W — p NO 00 -sj •<p 4* w n s ^ iilir s s s ?$ u» Ui Ul Ut o’ C/) s sp >1 p yi i is||j -6iffli?ao|f|o-''''- >*rT» nnaiu r 2 SSS5 2 a s ii- H o §l-s ? fp,.iIsJS5 " V-4 t» S 2» 2. o 5 52 S-2 s'Sz S “> I|s3 i 5 I Igl iLDii a iiSg?h< /-% COUNCIL MEETING JUL 2 7 1998 cmroFORONo REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: July 24,1998 ITEM NO.; ^ Department Approval:. Name Michael P. Gaf&on Title Senior Planning Coordinator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2340 Robert & Iris Waade, 3280/3290 North Shore Drive - Final Subdivision - Resolution List of Exhibits A - Final Plat Resolution & Duplex CUP Resolution B - Resolution #4092 - Preliminary Plat Resolution C - Final Plat D - Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan E - City Assessor's Valuation for Park Fee Purposes F - Final Plat Punch List Provided to Applicant 7-24-98 The applicant has submitted mylars and will be providing all necessary submittals for final plat approval as set forth in preliminary plat approval Resolution #4092 for this three lot subdivision. A declaration of covenants to be filed with the plat will include the obligation of property owners to maintain all drainage facilities and define responsibility for the sharing in the cost of the maintenance of the private road in Outlot A (also shared with neighboring property owners) and the shared driveway in Outlot B. Park Dedication City Assessor Rolf Erickson has established the value of Lot 1 (lakeshore lot) at $150,000 and Lot 2 (duplex lot) at $85,000, for a total predevelopment fair market value of $235,000. Since 8% of this amount is $ 18,800 or $6,267 per dwelling unit, the park fee will be reduced to the maximum amount of $4,900 per dwelling unit ($14,700 total) as established by City Ordinance #173 and Resolution No. 4063. CUP for Grading Within 5' of Property Boundary Final grading plans and road design plans have yet to be submitted. The berm along the west boundary is still proposed at a height of 2-3' above grade. Language granting a CUP for this berm and other grading within 5' of lot lines is incorporated into the final plat approval resolution. j i K \ > ? • #2340 Robert & Iris Waade July 24,1998 Page 3 CUP for Duplex Use A separate resolution is attached for approval of the duplex use, whci includes the requirement for a covenant prohibiting lake access for Lot 2. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the final plat of Maxwell Landing subject to the findings and conditions of the resolution enclosed for Council’s review and action. The plat will not be released for filing until all final documents have been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney, and final grading and road plans have been approved by the City Engineer, Staff recommends approval of the CUP for duplex use for Lot 2, Block 1 per the findings and conditions of the attached resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To either adopt or amend the enclosed final plat approval and duplex use CUP resolutions. r A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF MAXWELL LANDING FILE NO. 2340 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing tmder the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision of a three lot plat by Robert and Iris Waade (hereinafter "the subdivider"); and WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all standards of the LR-lC-1, Lakeshore Residential Zoning District finding that Lot 1 is of a size and configuration that would allow its use for a single family residence and Lot 2 is of a size and configuration that would allow its use for a duplex to be fully developed without the need of any variances other than those granted herein; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has agreed to complete all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: 1. 2. 3. 4. Completion of all the requirements of Resolution No. 4092, the resolution granting preliminary approval of the subdivision. Dedication on the plat of drainage and utility easements. Creation of a private road shown on the plat as Outlot A. Concurrent with the creation of this private road in Outlot A, dedication to the City of road and utility easements granting to the City permanent access, improvement and utility easements over said Outlot; and the creation of non-exclusive ingress, egress, drainage and utility easements over said Outlot in favor of all abutting lots within the plat including a declaration of covenants, conditions, restrictions and private roadway easement wherein any lot shall be sold, transferred and conveyed Page 1 of 5 aintenance for 5. 6. 9. coS'i *' •"^'""■™ “Pavements these required improvements are co^^f(TirStA°^7T'^'“ approval of the City Engineer. ^ ^ satisfacUon, subject to Provided evidence of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approval. $14,m '■« ' and 2 in the amount of of L plat!*^em'eSco'l'^^^^^ ““ fi'”8 srs.'Si’ss'Si" srjsi'.'js.v'tf.r ~ prohibited by code* and to allow id n* ’ ^ of a flag lot which is B where onlv Thw:.^ ^ driveway OuUot -ess; per the findings 1. Page 2 of 5 5. A conditional use permit is hereby granted for the berm including grading within 5 of lot lines, subject to City Engineer review and approval of final grading plans. ^ A. No direct access to NorA Shore Drive shall be allowed for any Lot. All dwelling units on Lots 1 and 2 may access Outlot A via Outlot B. The private road in Outlot A shall be allowed to access directly to County Road 84 subject to conditions for such access as imposed by the Hennepin County Department of Public Works in their required access permit. The pnvate road in Outlot A and the stormwater pond located in Lot 1, plus all required drmnage improvements and site grading per the preliminary plat drawings and preliminary grading and drainage plan shall be constructed by the developer subject to a Developers Agreement to be executed between the City and the developer. Private road and stormwater pond construction can begin as ^on as the final engineering plans for the road and pond have been approved by the City and the Developers Agreement has been executed. No grading within the 0-75' l^eshore setback zone will be allowed except as needed to accomodate the drainage plan. Erosion control shall be maintained over all disturbed areas until natural groundcover is restored. 6. No building permits for Lots 1 or 2 will be issued until a satisfactory road base and all drainage improvements have been installed per approval of the City Engineer. 7. The p^rivate road and private driveway and respective outlets shall be privately o^^ed and mamtained per the appropriate access easement/maintenance documents to exwuted by the developer, including easements in favor of the off-site users of said road The developer shall create a homeowners association or other appropriate vehicle for such ownership and maintenance. Subdivider shall grant drainage easements over the stormwater pond to benefit the Lot Owners and the City, and shall provide for maintenance thereof by the Lot Owners. 8. The developer shall grant to the City an underlying Road, Drainage and Utilities Easement over Outlot A. Page 3 of 5 ’■ •» existing certified copies ofSSng ^meS ' ,?* "■ iSrL"«i.Tr»t^rr^i,-sssr “ ■ '«- 2:j'SroSss£‘v2r™ I*,-'*" *• together with a certified origin^ copy omZ^s^^i^nZ^ January 27.1999 easements, deeds and covenants noted above. execue copies of the specified above. In tSJentJt^ll"]^ for subdivision review. Dated this 27th day of^Iy, 1998."^'^ application with the City of Orono ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Page 4 of5 I ‘ I A RESOLUTION GRANTING FILE NO. 2340 fte property <>f "Ci,y")L legally de“ riS“ ' (hereinafter Ute Lot 2, Block I, Maxwell Landing, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the "property"); and conditional use'^JSr^e^Ln^^^^^^^ for a Minnesota; IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1 . This applir^^Mon was reviewed as Zoning File #2340. 2. The property is treated in the LR-1 C-1 Lakeshore Residential Zoning District, 7.500 s.f (0.40 acre) and 135 ’lot width standards for a duplex minimum standards for a duplex in the LR-1 C zone. ^ 4. entire property is adjacent to and located within 200’ of thf. r o r ot, u in zoning code Section 10.20 Subdivision 3®, condmonal use Page 1 of5 5. 6. 7. The Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed this application on Febn^ 17,1998 and again on March 17, 1998 and May 18,1998. Members of the public commented on the proposed duplex use during the public hearing process and their comments and a submitted petition opposing the duplex use are on file. On May 18,1998 Planning Commission voted 5-1 to recommend approval of the requested conditional use permit for duplex use based upon the following findings: ® a. b. The criteria established by ordinance for a duplex use are complied with. The property comprising the Maxwell Landing subdivision is of a size that would have allowed a 3 unit development density if developed as a PRD, hence Ae proposed single family use of Lot 1 and duplex use of Lot 2 are not inconsistent with the development density that would have otherwise been allowed via a PRD which is allowed in the LR-lC-1 district. c. The east line of Lot 2 should be established as its front lot line. d. Lot 2 does not abut the lakeshore, does not qualify for lake ac ress under City code standards, and should be prohibited by covenant from gaining lake access via easement over Lot 1 . The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance and conditional use permit on the health, safety and welfare of the community. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting a conditional use permit for the proposed duplex use would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor would it depreciate surrounding property values; and that the proposed level of use of the property would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 5 2. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit for duplex use of Lot 2, Block 1, Maxwell Landing per Section 10.20 Subdivision 3(1) subject to the following conditions: 1. The proposed duplex structure shall meet all required setbacks, hardcover standards and other requirements of the zoning code. No variances will be granted for said duplex structure. Both units of the duplex shall gain access to North Shore Drive via Outlot A, Maxwell Landing The east boundary of Lot 2 abutting Outlot A, Maxwell Landing shaU be considered as the front lot line for zoning purposes. Applicant shall execute a covenant to be filed in the chain of title of Lots 1 and 2, Maxwell Landing, prohibiting the granting of lake acess via easement or other means over Lot 1 in favor of Lot 2. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this conditional use permit will expire on that date (July 27,1999). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violat' '>f the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herci J shall be pumshable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of tliemselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. 4. 5. 6. 7. Page 3 of 5 r Co^B 11 GlTYofORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4 0 9 2 A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF A CLASS III SUBDIVISION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3280/3290 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - FILE NO. 2340 WHEREAS} Robert and Iris Waade (hereinafter the "subdividers”) on January 23, 1998, filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a two lot residential plat of property legally described as: EXHIBIT A (Attached) (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono's Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 17, 1998 (continued to March 16, 1998, and concluded on May 18, 1998) at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on May 26, 1998 the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of the subdivider and voted 3-1 to grant conceptual approval and direct staff to draft a preliminary plat approval resolution noting the following findings of fact: 1. 2. 3. The property is located within the LR-lC-1 Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of one-half acre of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. The property contains a total of approximately 1.503 acres of land. There are no wetlands located on the property. The proposed plat consists of two residential lots each meeting the minimum lot area and width requirements of the LR-lC-1, Single Family Lakeshore Page 1 of 8 r CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 0 Q g 5. 6. limited required 150% (0.75 acre) lot area requirement of Section 11.31 Subd. 5C. The 'extra 50% area' requirement of said Subd. 5C is partially met by crediting the area of the proposed stormwater pond in Lot 1. Lot 1 also meets the required 100' LR-1C>1 minimum lot v.'*dth standard as measured at the shoreline and at the 75' lakeshore setback. Lot 2 is proposed for use as a duplex lot and meets the milium 0.50 acre lot area requirement and 135' defined width as measured at the 30' fi-ont setback line. Lot 2 is considered as a comer lot and the east lot line of lot 2 abutting Outlot A shall be considered as its front lot line for zoning purposes. Outlot A is a proposed private road corridor t^ch will serve this proposed 3- unit development and an additional 3-4 existing residential units to the east. Outlot A requires a variance due to its 40' width where a 50' private road corridor is normally required. The variance is justified by the limited lot area available and the long, narrow configuration of the site coupled with the need to provide access to a limited number of additional residences outside the property. Outlot B is a proposed access corridor to serve the back lot (Lot 1). Outlot B requires the following variances: a. Outlot width (30' required, 20' proposed) b. Driveway setback to west lot line (O' proposed, 10’ required) c. Lack of extension to south line of Lot 1, creating a flag lot’ (flag lots are not allowed) d. Only 2 residences allowed to access fi-om driveway outlot, 3 proposed The above variances are justified by the narrow width of the property, the lot area, and the ne^ to provide for minimum required area within each building lot. The unique location and orientation of this site makes these variances appropriate in this case where they likely would not be appropriate in other cases. The variance to allow 3 dwelling units to be served from Outlot B allows a shared driveway to serve both duplex units resulting in mirumization of hardcover. 7. Both lots are served with municipal sewer and have been fiilly assessed for Page 2 of8 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4 0 9 2 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. sewer to accommodate the 3 dwelling units proposed. All 3 units will be served by private wells. Both Lots shall be served by a private road designated on the plat as Outlot A. Said private road Outlot slM be 40' in width, and shall connect at the northerly end of Outlot A to the existing private driveway serving 3 additional existing dwelling units to the east of the property. Said private road shall be constructed to a 24' paved width within Outlot A No cul-de-sac will be required since the private driveway serving the adjacent properties has a loop which will serve as an emergency vehicle turnaround. These dimensions require the granting of a variance to City road width and cul-de-sac standards. The basis for such variance is the limited number of properties which will ultimately be served, the limited area available for access roads, and the coniSguration of the property in relation to adjacent existing properties which will ultimately benefit from this private road. Said Outlot shall be subject to an underlying road, drainage and utility easement to be granted to the City. However, the private road shall be privately owned and maintained. A stormwater pond will be developed within Lot 1 and a drainage easement will be granted to the City over said pond and the necessary draihageways serving it. The City Engineer has reviewed the preliminary site grading and drainage plan and finds it acceptable subject to minor revisions. Thomas D. Johnson, Transportation Planning Engineer for the Hennepin County Department of Transportation, in his letter of February 12, 1998, approved the proposed curb cut location to North Shore Drive (County Road 51) subject to dedication of additional right-of-way (shown as Outlot C on the preliminary plat drawings) and regrading of the roadway banks in this location. The Orono Park Commission has recommended that no additional right-of-way or trail easements are required from this development since any future trail needs can be accommodated witWn the existing right-of-way. The area of the stormwater pond shall count towards lot area of Lot 1 for zoning purposes as noted above, and shall count towards lot area credit for hardcover ^culation purposes. The City intends that no hardcover variances Page 3 of 8 J CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. dnoo will be granted for development of dwelling units on Lots 1 and 2. the 5r“£^F"‘“^ ihe finHin.. ™*^“roRE, BE rr RESOLVED, that based upon one or more or the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby aoLv« ^ p munary p at yphcation of Robert and Iris Waade at 3280/3290 North Shore Drive oer I ** j”'*""8s by David E. Crook, a licensed surveyor of DeMars-Gabriel i.and foUoJ4"condhions' The proposed private road on said preliminary plat drawing shall ' a.» »^ed Mcesrc''o,^dn?l°n‘k' J*"'*™'"* “ Ou"®‘ ^ Th* proposed lack lot North Shme n • ^Ir ' *’ right-of-way for „ ?7! ®" *« preliminary plat drawingsas Outlot C shall be platted as dedicated public roadway. 2.A variance will be granted for the 40' width of Outlot A which does not meet Page 4 of8 J «• CITYof ORONO m3® RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4(\^2 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. North Shore Drive (County Road 51) shown on the preliminary plat drawings ^ as Outlot C shall be platted as dedicated public roadway. A variance will be granted for the 40' width of Outlot A which does not meet the 50' required outlot width. A variance will be granted for the width of Outlot B, the driveway setback in Outlot B, the creation of a flag lot, and to allow 3 dwelling units to gain access via Outlot B. Lots 1 and 2 shall access to the private road in Outlot A. No direct access to North Shore Drive shall be allowed for any Lot All dwelling units on Lots 1 and 2 may access Outlot A via Outlot B. The private road in Outlot A and the stormwater pond located in Lot 1, plus all required drainage improvements and site grading per the preliminary plat drawings and preliminary grading and drainage plan shall be constructed by the developer subject to a Developers Agreement to be executed between the City and the developer. Private road and stormwater pond construction can begin as soon as the engineering plans for the road and pond have been approved by the City and the Developers Agreement has been executed. The private road shall be allowed to access directly to County Road 84 subject to conditions for such access as imposed by the Hennepin County Department of Public Works in their required access permit. The private road and private driveway and respective outlots shall be privately owned and maintained per the appropriate access easement/maintenance documents to be executed by the developer, including easements in favor of the off-site users of said road. The developer shall create a homeowners association or other appropriate vehicle for such ownership and maintenance. No building permits will be issued until the private road base work has been completed and been approved by the City. The developer shall grant to the City an underlying Road, Drainage and Utilities Easement over Outlot A. 9. Subdivider to designate drainage easements over all drainageways and stormwater ponds within plat, and shall grant utility casements within the plat for existing Page 5 of 8 t • « f • m GITYof ORONO \k\U(X CSHO' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO._4 0 9 2 sewer lines if it is detennined* that such lines are not covered under existing easements. 10. A conditional use permit will be granted for the berm including grading within 5' of lot lines, subject to City Engineer review and approval of final grading plans. 11.Subdivider is hereby advised that the City will not grant final plat approval nor allow road and pond construction to commence until the MCWD has approved all grading and drainage improvements on the property, or developer provides evidence that no MCWD approval is required. 12. Payment of standard Park Dedication Fee. 13.Subdivider is hereby advised that preliminary subdivision approval will expire within one year of the date of Council approval, June 8, 1999. Should the subdivider fail to complete the filing of the final plat application within the year deadline, it shall be necessary for the subdivider to file a new preliminary subdivision application with the City. Final Plat Submittak: The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month. These submittals are as follows: 1. Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies (one copy for the City's records and one for filing with Hennepin County) and one (1) copy reduced to 1" = 200'. Drawing to include; a. Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by David E. Crook of DeMars- Gabriel Land Surveyors, Inc. dated Januai • 26, 1998, revised May 13, 1998. b. Private road to be designated on the plat as Outlot A. c.Dedication of drainage and utility easements 10' wide along the exterior boundaries of property and 5' along the internal lot lines. Page 6 of 8 !• t CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4 A Q <> ^ dedication of drainage easements over detention ponds ’ ^^^diainageways as shown on preliminaiy plat and preliminary g^ing e. The naming of plat 2. Legal documents required: * a. b. Trde opraon addressed to the City. AH owners, mortgage holders or o^ with property mterest indicated therein shall signihe plat and all Other documents affected by such mterest ^ P and all Developer’s Agreement and letter of credit for •teSnage facUiti^’ir™'’ P^vate road (Outlot A), Signed and executed Road. Drainage and Utilities Easem A*ent over Outlot f. fr^Alr“^i w"”' Easements over existing sewer or other utility lines as may be identified. . Fees to be paid: Total due: $400.00* a. Final plat fee = $200.00 Page 7 of 8 *. - * LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1. (PID Wa-f 17-23 410011) EXHIBIT A ” RESOLUTION NO. 4092 That part of the West 15.7 feet of the East 539 feet of Government Lot 1, Section Eight (8), Township One Hundred Seventeen (117), Range Twenty three (23). lying Nortt. of a line drawn at right angles to the easr line of said section at a point 394.5 feet South of the meander corner at the east line of said section together with an easement for road purposes over that part of said 15.7 feet lylnj Sou'he'ly of said line and North of the county road. ALSO, all tiiat part of Government Lot 1, Section 8, Township 117, Range 23 described as follows: Commencing a? a point where a line drawn parallel with and distant 539 feet West of the east line of Section s'lntersects the northerly line of county road known as Markeville and Maple Plain Road; thence North parallel with said section line 556.0 feet to the shore of Maxwell's Bay, Lake Minnetonka; thence southwesterly along the shore of said take 188.78 feet to a point which Is 710.1 feet West of said section line and also the northeasterly comer of land conveyed by deed recorded In Book488ofDeeds,p. 237; thence southerly along the easterly Une of land so deeded 400 feet to the northerly line of said county road, said point being 724 feet West of the section Unepihence southeasterly along said county road to the point of commencement, EXCEPT the • West 70 feet thereof, said 70 feet being measured at right angles from the westerly line thereof; EXCEPT that part of the entire above described premises lying South of a line drawn at right angles to the east line of said section at a point 394.5 feet South of the meander comer of the east line of said section, together with an easement for road purposes over the West 15 feet of that part of the above described premises lying southerly of the line drawn at right angles to the east line of said section at a point 394.5 feet South of the meander comer on the east line of said section, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Hennepin . County Recorder. PARCEL 2. (PID 118-117-23 41 0010) The West 15.7 feet of the East 539 feet of that part of Government Lot 1 lying North of a road, ALL IN Section 8, Township 117, Range 23, and all that part of Lot 1, Section 8, Township 117, Range 23, described as follows: Commencing at a point where a line drawn parallel with and distant 539 feet West of the east line of said Section 8 intersects the northerly line of county road known as . Markeville and Maple Plain Road; thence North parallel with said section line 556.0 feet to the shore of Maxwell's Bay, Lake Minnetonka; thence southwesterly along the shore of said lake . 188.78 feet to a point which is 710.1 feet West of said section Vne and also the northeasterly comer of land conveyed by deed recorded In Book 488 of Deeds, p. 237; thence southerly along the easterly line of land so deeded 400 feet to the northerly line of said county road, said point being 724 feet West ofVte'section line; thence southeasterly along said county road to the point of commencement, EXCEPT the West 70 feet thereof, EXCEPT that part of the entire above described premises lying South of a line drawn at right angles to the east line of said seciion at a point 494.5 feet South of the meander comer of the east line of said section, said last described line being designated as line ’A"', sr.d EXCEPT that part of the entire above described premises lying North of a line drawn at right angles to ihe cast line of said section at a point 394.5 feet South of the meander corner of the east line of said section. PARCELS. (PID 408-117-2344 0002) Commencing at a point distant 447.8 feet West of a point In the east line of Government Lot 1 distant 376.35 feet South from the meander comer at the northeast corner of Lot 1; thence South 82.05 feet; thence South 11 degrees 47 minutes West 115.38 feet to the actual poin t of beginning; thence continuing South 11 degrees 47 minutes West 103.17 feet; thence South 12 degrees 37 rninutes East 71 feet to the northerly line of County Road No. 51; thence westerly along said road line 47.2 feet to a point distant 523.3 feet West from the east line of Lot 1; thence North parallel with said east tine to a point due Westirom point of beginning; thence East to beginning, Sectloii 8, Township 117, Range 23. PARCEL 4. (PIDU08-117-23 44 0018) Lot 1, Block 1, Moellers Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Henn'ipm County, Minnesota. t Together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto, subject to the foUowing exceptions: Utility easementSf road easements, zoning ordinances, and mineral reservation of record. 11 «fm nimi . • *» « i * ! •• • • •n. ‘*••.207:- iiVvc.': V .;;fi Vs eo.33,-Ti it • • • ••- . IVIMAVVC.LL I % •« / i • ; V GARDEN AREA \' • .N. ,SH?ropose^house j) , •• p * I* •■■•;;( I ws? fi »' • • tc-<^342- V , n’- ' eo.33*T* * . ovCftflo^ ^ ^(^325-2) : 1 ,w(¥ n ■ . -\\ 1 y'■ V ../^/;. ^PROPOSED POA/O • • / /IM/Lt <^^0.75. l-V *9)Z-7 • ••: . ... •. .1 ^ .. v",; * . —— Cl'»W>IW»V Wwr- . - - • •. .S\LT FEAiCE <riP) . • « » OftAWAGG; /\f.nou/U'if) IM • # I/VV.- • • ^3012. ey. coAnow-ri . / r" •/AATCVi EK. Dvwy. Protect &lo&. '""a'. ' • • ) I ) \ \ I •. V • • • • ^ •• CITY of ORONO Munlc^MlOtncM Port Office Box 66 Crysial Baji Mbmooti 5.XFA"i r.v TO; Orono Zoning Department FRCW: Rolf Erickson, City Assessor DATE: _____________ RE: Park dedication fee of: f^2^40_L V?^, ^ --------f^cgjla 4n, 3^ S/)O^C -/WATCVl EX. OvuY, •. •• • • * JSOoDc:> I ^it/ hCVC.S'‘&$ -2.'^5*00 0 I telephone - 473-7357 • FAX - 4734)510 >St m COUNCIL MEETIN JUL 2 7 1998 C1TYOFORONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: July 23, 1998 Department Approval: Name Liz Van Zomeren Title City Planner Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2368 Kirk and Susan Otteson 710 North Arm Drive __________ Variances-Resolution Zoning District: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre) Lot Area:19,945 sq. ft. (.46 acres) Application:The applicants appeared at the May, June, and July Planning Commission meetmg. Their original proposal was to add onto the existing residence which would have required encroachment into the top of bluff setback an average lakeshore setback, and hardcover variances. The applicants revised the plan by proposing a second floor addition in lieu of a main floor addition. The revised plan requhes no further encroachment into the average lakeshore setback and will not further encroach into the required setback form the top of the bluff. The amount of proposed hardcover increases to .illow the hoL .t to be squared off". The existing hardcover is at 24.15%, the proposed hardcover is 27.69%. The applicants initially proposed removing the sidewalk (221 sq. ft.) and the driveway turnout pad (207 sq. ft.) which represents 428 sq. ft. or 2.8%, however, staff did not recommend that these be eliminated because they are necessary for access to the residence and for proper sight lines for exiting from the property. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: To approve on a 6-0 vote to allow a second story addition that requires an average lakeshore setback, top of bUiff setback and hardcover variance in the 75'-250' setback to increase from to 27.69%. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To approve or amend the enclosed resolution. J TO:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/Zoning Administrator DATE:July 10,1998 SUBJECT:#2368 KirkOtteson 710 North Arm Drive Variances—Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre) Lot Area:19,945 sq. ft. (.46 acres) Application:The applicant appeared at the May and June Planning Commission meetings requesting average lakeshore setback, bluff setback and hardcover variances in the 75'-250' setback to allow an addition to an existing residence that is located forward of the average lakeshore setback within 30' of a bluff where the existing hardcover is at 24.15%. The applicant has submitted an alternate plan to add a second floor to the existing residence. The alternate plan to add a second story requires variances for average lakeshore setback, bluff setback, and hardcover in the 75'-250’ setback. Pertinent Ordinances: Section 10.24, LR-IB, One Family Lakeshore Residential District Section 10.22, Subd. 1 and 2, Lakeshore Setback and Hardcover Regulations Section 10.56, Subd. 16, C. (2) Bluff Setback H2368 KirkOtteson 710 Sorth Arm Drive July 20. 1998 po^~I ANALYSIS Lot Area and Yards LR-IB District Standards Subject Property Lot Area and Yards Lot Area Lot Width Rear Yard Side Yard Lakeside Bluff 19,945 sq. ft.100'at 29' to SW W-22.5'78'-83' from y from1 (.46 acres)lakeshore comer E-30.4'OHWL top ofp95' at 75' setback of garage existing and proposed 12'-15' ahead of the ALS bluff would not further encroach into the required bluff setback. H2368 Kirk\,n€Son 710 North Arm Drive July 20.1998 page—2 Structural Coverage Total Lot Size 19,945 sq. ft. (.46 acres) Total Structural Coverage Allowed 2,991.75 sq. ft. (15%) Percentage House=905 sq. ft. Addition=47 sq. ft. Garage=591 sq. ft. Total=l,543 sq. ft. (7.7%) The proposed amount of structural coverage is less than the 15% lot coverage requirement. Hardcover Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Existing Hardcover Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Variance Requested 0'-75’ • 7,069 sq. ft.None None None None 75’-250’12,876 sq. ft.3,100 sq. ft. (24.15%) 3,219 sq. ft. (25%) 3,566 sq. ft. (27.69%) 347 sq. ft. (2.7%) The existing amount of hardcover is slightly less than 1% of the total amount of hardcover allowed on the subject property. The applicant proposed removing 221 sq. ft. of hardcover by eliminating the sidewalk and 207 sq. ft. of the driveway turnaround to ftirther reduce hardcover. However, staff recommends that the sidewalk remain to provide a reasonable walkway to the entrance. Staff further recommends that the driveway turnaround be allowed to remain because of the existing topography and the obstructed sight lines created by the adjacent garage to the west. This is not a driveway that staff can comfortably recommend that the resident and guests should back out of onto North Arm Drive. The new hardcover being added is to the street yard side of the existing residence to square off the master bedroom and the dining room and to allow an entrance deck. A hardcover variance to increase a deck by 48 sq. ft. and the house by 47 sq. ft. is reqw.red. i^2S6S Ktrk Otteson 710 North Arm Drive July 20. 1998 page~f r STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP Criteria for Determining Undue Hardship 1. 2. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The property can continue to be used as a residence without the variances. However, the existing residence has a 905 sq. ft. footprint. Additions were made in 1956 and 1964. The applicants are asking for variances to increase the amount of space in their home and improve the flow of the floor plan, maximize lake views, add living space and upgrade bathrooms. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The situation is caused by the existing residence being located forward of the average lakeshore setback and in the top of the bluff setback area. A hardcover variance could be eliminated if the sidewalk and driveway turnaround were removed, however, staff is not recommending that this non-structural hardcover be removed. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. If the variances are granted, the second story addition will not interfere with views from adjacent property nor have an impact on the ravine. 4. 5. The spiecial conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The existing residence was constructed before the current zoning regulations. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. 6. The subject lot is unique due to its location near the ravine, the topography of the lot and the need to retain the sidewalk and driveway turnaround, aiid the proximity of the adjacent residences and the average lakeshore setback. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. »2368 Ktrk Olteson 710 Sorth Arm Drive July 20. 1998 page—I r The applicant should provide his testimony regarding the need to maintain his property rights by constructing a second story addition. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. The existing residence is partially located in the required bluff setback area and the average lakeshore setback area. The existing amount of hardcover is slightly less than 1% of the maximum amount allowed. Very few, if any, changes can be made to this residence without requiring a variance. If the structure were removed, a lot area, lot width and bluff setback variance would most likely be required. (See building pad exhibit). Issuer 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. The subject property does not meet the lot area, lot width or bluff setback requirements. The existing residence is located ahead of the average lakeshore setback. The residence was built before 1956 and has a 905 sq. ft. footprint. The topography of the subject lot rises 25 ft. from the shoreline to the lakeside of the residence. A ravine is located along the east side of the property. The garage is located at a higher elevation than the house. The adjacent residence to the west does not meet the side yard setback. It is located 2.5' from the property line. The applicant has indicated that he does not want to build into the side yard because it would further reduce the distance between the principal structures. The adjacent property also has a garage that is located 1.5 ft. fi-om the property line. The proximity of this garage to the property line and its relationship to the street blocks sight lines for exiting from the subject property. Therefore, the driveway turnout should remain to allow the residents to have better visibility in backing out of the garage and entering onto the street. 7. rhe proposed alternate design does not further encroach on the bluff setback and does not interfere with views. U2368 KirkOtteson 710 Sorth Drive July 20. 1998 pagers r STAFF RECOMMENDATION To discuss the alternate plan and review the requested variances. Attachments A Application B Location Map C County Plat Map D Topographic Map E Original Request F Alternate Plan & Building Pad G Lakeside Elevation H Cross Section I Floor Plans J Permit Record KirkOtttson HO North Arm Drive JufylO, 1998 pag€—t Lwnwt»5i Hire iiKUKijairo »Tli|ICC rmws\ rtn^fsi ^nKTilL nciTsI rOKP.TTi rtT¥i[^K1Rl STiTO IJiliraBW mnm r Minnesota: 1. 2. 3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2368. The property is located in the LR-IB Zoning District where 1 acre or 43,560 sq. ft. is the minimum lot area. The property consists of .46 acres or 19,945 sq.ft. The Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 20, 1998 and recommended >>{!> ioval on a vote of 6 to 0. 4. The Plarming Commission made the following findings of fact: A. The subject property does not meet lot area, lot width, bluff setback or average lakeshore setback. B. The residence was built before 1956 and has a 905 sq. ft. footprint. C. The topography of the lot changes grade by 25 ft. from shore to the street. A ravine is located along the east property line. D. The adjacent residence to the west encroaches on the required 10' side yard setback. E. The adjacent property has a garage that is located 1.5 ft. from the side property line. The topography and sight lines to the street require tliat the property owners retain a driveway pad to enable turning around in the driveway to have visibility to exit safely from the property. F. The proposed addition meets height and structural coverage limitations and will not inhibit views from adjacent properties. G. The proposed addition will not further encroach on the bluff or ravine. Page 2 of 5 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B); Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2; and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C-2) to permit a second story addition and improvements as submitted in the survey dated April 7, 1998 and revised July 7, 1998 by Westwood Engineering. Approval was subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (July 27, 1999). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 3 of 5 r t ii» t. 3.The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 27th day of July, 1998 ATTEST; Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of July, 1998, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Oiono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 J r STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 ___, before me a Notary Public within and for said County , personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of 199 ___, before me a Notary Public within and for said County , personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 5 of 5 J APPLICATION EXHIBIT A Application # Date Receiyed Amount Y2CLit307> CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 (SSO.OO per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address ~7/q Dg. AA a / A « m. ^ ^ ^ ^ , • Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)_ A A i if 1 1 J • A* A i * A* •Attach legal description to af plication if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired Apt\\ ___________________________^(month/year) I (do) ^0 no^ also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: y residential ___pother (specify) APPLICANT Phone (home) Name MaU Phone (work)'/S'/ 5 Address: “7/o City: /UowAcl Zip:^5'3d»W OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: See. h44^Wc ‘ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot W^' di )( Hardcoyer Lot Coverage Setback: Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore ^ Other fspecify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: 'See. _________________ (attach additional sheets if necessary) 7 T'~- '(X: O' REQUIRED SUBMll'T/iLS All gf th? follPFlng infyrmatiQq b? SMbmitted bv the annlicaHon deadline date in itrocr for vour application to be considered complete; 1. 2. 3. X 4. 5. 6. X X X Completed Application Form Certified Propei^ Owners List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-3271). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) an 1 include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8V2" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (I> copy 8'/2'’ x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8’/a" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicaht(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notifled of this application. x Additional items as may be requested by City staff. • • The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour yananct appikatiort is not complete if the above informaJoit has not been induded. • • APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) Md/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/lier knowledge. Date OWNER'S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City stafi', consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner’s Signature Date S' 2jo - 9/^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 8 Description of request: Hardship/description of unusual property conditions; We would like to request a variance for the address of 710 North Arm Drive. We would like to add a small addition to the south east of the current structure and remodel the existing house. The new addition would not be going any closer to lake Miimetonka but paralleling the shore line approximately 85 feet back. Unfortunately the house is positioned close to a bl’.'fif on the south east side of the lot. The bluff descend any where from 6 to 8 feet vertically on the south east side of the lot. The south east side of the bluff appears to be man made to accommodate a small road or path ^nr 740 North Arm Drive. ^’urrently the house is old and is need of major remodeling and code guidance. The roof needs to be replaced, the siding and windows are starting to rot and need replacing and some to the wiring is questionable. We need to remove the roof and put on a new one. We would like to gut the intenor of the bouse and update the wiring to code and make two new bedrooms and two baths upstairs. A new kitchen and living space will also be added. All the exterior siding will be replaced along with replacing the deck on the back of the house and adding an entry to the front of the house. All of the work v.'ill be carried out in a timely manner and performed by professional carpenters. So C Q( Lakeside elevation 7 I 1 ^x/r 1 1 I i 1 Xl 1 1 1 > A^X/\ 1 \ 1 \ jyX/\ 1 r 1 \ 1 1 -----------■ ■■"XXX - .jyX A i i i i i \ yx/'\ i. i 1,1 '■ N>Xyy/ \ 1 ' !X\^ X/\ \ i 1 11 X > Vl 1 1 \ 1 ] r 1 1. i_i_ 1 1 — / I i 1 » 1 ^y A \ 1 1 - -YAy-j^•\X /TTpr _____________\ y 1 1 iHWUimavWIIV 111 TTr LJ A V . - .'^5? JCUW ■Hr] IH:^, L'., I l.K !!.S=:=51!K w jjl III SSiSUiSitiKaiSiill Wcu3Jn=a3*:«BiJ — ICT vSiljB is iM'riuLsf n mi :t nil. H- rtWAl 0sH S. ra^iscrJts^ri- — - or* «%.-■*? r-* ^‘T 7 *1^ ****** r—*.. i* ii Cross Section for Second Story Addition ALL ^ C^Pf€P i Bin ifut^. iPhone itniiw / / / / / M HCrfC** ALL-erTROctltf^L ioffW?r PRSHN «BW \rUX3R *naJe6® *© exiST/M6> fi^3Bi&l^,f5w(?Ati0Ki. euBSHf^MiS fufi fdcnitm^ <sERn«s? ^ A MJNWeSOT?^ LiCCi&SD • Ml •lTl» 4 » ft X A •f ' J1 L' »f h / <0^)e© IjDCHlt^ 'TOVVAI^ NVAgT^ gg:>fiPg'M,P/MIM6.k!n2H.5IPggr CTr Floor Plans r " FCAhi ■-&i3Ate{y4ciio r "7/0 A-rrv\ Permit No. __34. a PERMIT RECORD Date PERMIT RECORD Type of Permit .^dcy. 7V <JCLA.au!lP S~9/3 -U>)nd /j )j^ //- V-JP-/^ COUNCIL MEETi:'.’V.1 JUL 2 7 1998 CITYOFGRONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE; July 23,1998 ITEM NO.: 3 Title Senior Planning Coordinator Agenda Section: Zoning »«m D«.cripH.o; Proposed Joint Use Dock Relocalion ■ Navarre Cove (Kelly Cove) Zoning District: LR-IB ® eXX'^rve “0" 4 units of U,e 6- which has been in place since 1 978 The existing"°“*® *®"’J®'"'«« dock system Cove, which is au,?ounded“y “ *“■" ^utlot A, Navane which has been razed. Since Lot 3 is now ho’ * onner site of the old "fire station" duplex remaining four duplex unit owners would prefeno hav^ffom sUrsh *°d "’® from their commons area which is known L Outlot A Kelf^ve List of Exhibits A - Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List c : S Sef;c»“;: O^CHAiPresidem Austin Evans D - Memo and Exhibits of June 17,1998 duly 13 Council Action haling ’: Co^d^Lrir t^eVS'0 proposal; ® ® ^ comments and suggestions in regard to the Kelly Cove Joint Use Dock July 23,1998 Page 2 The request has merit and might be considered for approval under the following scenano: 1. 2. Owner of Lot 3, Navarre Cove (Hoyt) must agree via covenant to a limit of two boats for a single family residence on Lot 3, and formally gives up the rights to have a duplex on the property. Outlot A, Navarre Cove and Lot 3 must then be legally combined, and KCHA's interests in Outlot A and Lot 3 must be extinguished. KCHA must agree via covenant to limit the new docks to no more than 4 slips of a size (width and length) no greater than the existing slips, and in a compact and defined location and configuration. Council directed staff to schedule a public hearing on this matter and notify the neighboring lakeshore property owners. Staff has sent mailed notice to all property owners abutting the lagoon. Existing and Proposed Dock Layout The existing dock system contains 3 docks with slips on either side for a total of 6 slips. The City and LMCD permits have formally allowed a dock length of 44' since 1993 (increased from 25' during the late '80s drought). The docks are separated by 22' and 28' respectively such that the interior slips (2-3-4-5 as shown on Exh. E-1 of the June 17 memo) could potentially accommodate boats of 10-12' beam. The proposed new KCHA slips are 32' deep and 13' wide, and start approximately 24' from the shore, v^th a single access walkway from shore. The new dock system is proposed to extend from just west of the midpoint of Kelly Cove Outlot A, more or less centered on the KCHA site. Staff is advised that some neighboring property owners may request that the dock system be redesigned or relocated to have less impact on lagoon traffic. The owner of Lot 3 has not indicated how a dock system would be configured to serve a single family residence on Lot 3. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan The conditions under which Council suggested this new joint use dock license might be approved appear to be consistent with the Orono Comprehensive Plan General Land Use Policies (CMP 4-13, item 5) which states: "5. PROTECTION OF LAKE RESOURCES WILL ALLOW REASONABLE ACCESS, USE -AND ENJOYMENT WHILE PREVENTING OVERCROWDING AND EXCESSIVE ENCROACHMENT. In conformance with MnDNR Shoreline Management regulations for recreational development lakes, Orono will prohibit overly dense development within 1,000 Kelly Cove Joint Use Dock July 23,1998 Page 3 feet of Lake Minnetonka. Lake use regulations will be promoted to limit excessive boat density and overuse of sensitive bays. Land use regulations will be developed to provide reasonable control over building density, land alteration and lakeshore encroachment.” Compliance with City Code Standards As noted in the June 17 memo, the proposed 4-slip joint use dock meets the standards established for such uses in Municipal Code Section 5.42, i.e. it results in no n.ore than 1 boat slip per 50' of shoreline as measured in a straight line, and does not require additional parking or new hardcover. Further, there will be no negative impacts on the adjacent land area which, although covered under a wetland easement since 1979, does not have the characteristics of a wetland. Staff Recommendation Council should again review the June 17 staff memo and exhibits. Also review the written comments of the applicant and neighboring property owners. Staff supports the application under the conditions suggested by Council. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Receive public comments at the public hearing. Reach a conclusion on whether and under what conditions a joint use dock license should be issued to Kelly Cove Homeowners Association and direct staff to draft an appropriate resolution for adoption at your next meeting. >! tiW'bF i ? m«n. «1Jl*7J )9«,P*!l..«fc.?, \^' *. - ' . • • • / N'*' V<n-1 % r If • I ■lic«ns».application, by ;?»# •J?''*■ .Hom^wnaft Asaociatipn lo al^1 1 ..vhi' . •.^> -I : • . ..All parions wtshinQ »,bf .n^at? . lappaar at this lima.' Writttn eommanw.ya, ' '■ solicitad. A map ot tha pfoposad dock »td ia ■ .: ^raaabla in Diy pBlcas lor tayiaw. <4 J . V, ;.n By; OtyCoonol 'f;!v • .it; ‘ MWwalP.Oa^rs^tof^l^^''’‘t .4S*i.-tv,.Cwdlnater toTiia !:’4m .suo^ J Affidavit of Publication state of Minnesota, County of Hennepin. Bill Holm, being duly sworn on oath, says that ho Is an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as THE LAKER, Mound, Minnesota, and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: A.) The newspaper has complied with ail the requirements constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. B.) The printed .Tnint Use Dock License Application which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week for i successive weeks: It was first published Saturday thft 18 day of_____JulV_____ 19 ^9.-, and was thereafter printed and published every Saturday, to and including Saturday, tha day of. ized Agent Subscribed and sworn to me on this 18 day of July ,1^8 J\]l 2 0 OiTV KRISTI HOLM notary nteic • iMNNCsora MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JANUARY 31. 2000 ■NotamPubllc (1) Lowest dassified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space: S12.M per inch. 0 Maximum rate allowed by law for above matter: $12.90. (3) Rate actually charged for above matter. $7.19 per inch. Each additional successive week: $5.14. fAfis\Ltt^G uisT' s Hbiaa /A)q ^ • f I 20-117-23 12 0027 Ward E. Edwards 2474 Carman Street Wayzata, MN 55391 20-117-23 12 0050 20-117-23 12 0028 Richard A. Edwards 2480 Carman Street Wayzata, MN 55391 20-117-23 12 0037 Charles & Candice Nadler • 2509 Kelly Avenue Excelsior, MN 55331 20-117-23 12 0038 David R. Hardten 2515 Kelly Avenue Excelsior, MN 55331 20-117-23 12 0039 Bradley A. Hoyt 2523 Kelly Avenue Excelsior, MN 55331 20-117-23 12 0046 Bradley A. Hoyt 1340015th Ave. N. Suite F Plymouth, MN 55441 20-117-23 12 0047 Navarre Cove Homeowners Association 2499 Kelly Avenue Excelsior, MN 55331 20-117-23 12 0048 20-117-23 12 0061 (CITY OF ORONO) 20-117-23 12 0051 Austin & Diane Evans 2497 Kelly Avenue Excelsior, MN 55331 20-117-23 12 0052 Sylvia A. Bertagnoli 2499 Kelly Avenue Excelsior, MN 55331 20-117-23 120053 20-117-23 12 0054 Todd Jones 3555 Co. Rd. No. 44 Miimetonka, MN 55364 20-117-23 12 0055 Kelly Cove Homeowners Association c/o Kim Goebel 100 S. 5th St. Suite 2500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 20-117-23 12 0056/0057/0062 Edward T. Lehman 4501 Shoreline Drive #232 Spring Park, MN 55384 20-117-23 12 0058 Anthony Laselle & Charlotte Addison-Laselle 2440 Carman Street Wayzata, MN 55391 20-117-23 12 0059 R.C. Kuncio & S.E. Raleigh 2450 Carman Street Wayzata, MN 55391 20-117-23 12 0060 Thomas A. Lind 2470 Carman Street Wayzata, MN 55391 -I / - -- . -t ^ • ••• % •. •• — L PfiD^OSC^ D^Cic * - ' SCALE IM «CT GORDON R. COFFIN LANO SURVEYOHS a ENGINEERS LONG LAKE , MINNESOTA OUV I LUI d. (12)11 ? 1 -tH 1. *?: 1 1 S) () 1 m f 1 99 * <• «<r go go 50 90 901 c *) / ii'^ts ^ •• •. 50 ir II II /: 10 .••••' II ✓. n y ^IS d c tr •r r III) r IW) if tf%• ao” III)^ on ?( ?f “jT (114 ir>(ID (i« r?Q V.50 *jal 71-9)•Fl*50 1)99 7) n 5J fig*- SI loncb IN a '!•y%40 iVl# 2664.61 RES ar*4j'B*i (l ICG AH—NO—1-5 28)^ g?gpi |S^(15)^ 1» #1 ^I g ,v * •**••' *4* 9 k ' [25)^ BPTW 1* 10 '& (10)* inim s I (60)fc DOC M I04IIIS H™:i4W.ia-----» 1^1 iCI.M % 65(r>8^j*o5st " cocw JOCJI ,, J21) •••• --• lAl* , ' i OUTlOT * a * /«. • (55) 7Tnr 4 &)Us.nt^Cs. 4®’^ \o|wrPo*^^-2 Col fiLA-r % — r • • • »«*««« M •••• I I ^ ••! I -.LJ _L.l_ I f ; I I. »•* I I .. i I I I 5 ) -J, I I I A------ ^ • 11 • (1 1 1 ------L___! ____i> ’ < ■ I r i "'i—{—— ; I • • • 2 t I • . • » I __IV t.. i I 1.^1 I ■-+-—I—!—L—i_ I—( ! 1*1 •*, •••• J-*'—.. • —— L I i .J. I. __f WA/BtJ i I U%bI-irS2r\ I I 1 I '•—r /H^cerA¥? ^mm9mrn ■ ■ — i « I •;-Li. ~rr :-r h -i-i:44ffn-Liqi I_[ rrrrrrrt----.—---:---,---1------,___} • » ! ! ! I ! I I ! : i "T — r* t V«*. •m> •*. '2: :* • ? 8 KELLY COVE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 2497 Kelly Avenue Excelsior, MN 55331. USA ‘' • *t * • July 22,1998 Telephone (612) 471 - 1170 Fax (612) 471-1184 *' V .• I Sr . ^ Mayor Jabbour and City Council Members City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono MN 55356 Dear Mayor Jabbour and City Council Members: Re: Dock License Application Kelly Cove Homeowners Association of Orono. As I will be in Europe on Monday July 27,19981 regret that I will not be present at the public hearing on the Association's application for a joint use dock license. Mr. John Kupfer (an Association member) will however be present representing the Association. I would like to draw your attention to the following points: 1. The present license to the six member Navarre Cove Homeowner ’s Association is for six slips on docks of 44' in length; the application is for docks of 32* in length. 2. I believe the application is asking for no more than what it is entitled to under zoning law and riparian rights, as indicated in the Staff Recommendation dated June 17, 1998. 3. In the Staffs discussion (June 17, 1998) of the application they comment that no boat traffic problems are anticipated. If this application is approved then the benefits to the immediate neighborhood are: a) Oulot A of Navarre Cove would go away as will the current docks, and be replaced by newer and more acceptable construction. b) The owner of the adjoining lot, Mr. Brad. Hoyt, will be able to develop his land which will enhance the character of the area. Yours sincerely. Austin H. Evans President JIJL —22-^3 MED 03:0T PM CHUCK HADLER ei2 4T1 332?P . O 1 C July 22, 1998 City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Fax 473*0510 Dear Michael P. Gaffron, We live at 2509 Kelly Avenue which has lakeshore on the lagoon and abuts the 2505/2507 Kelly property which currently has an out lot for the neighbors to the north to have docks on that property. Wo strongly endorse the proposal to have the city of Orono grant a license to the property owners of the Kelly Cove Homeowners to allow the erection of docks on their properiy(2497-2503 Kelly Avenue). This dock license will facilitate the improvement of the 2505/2507 Kelly property which will enhance the residential life of our neighborhood. Sincerely, Charles E. Nadler and Candice Nadter 2509 Kelly Avenue Excelsior, MN 65331 r REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: June 17,1998 ITEM NO.: ^ Department Approval; Name Michael P. Gaffron Title Senior Planning Coordinator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: Proposed Joint Use Dock Relocation - Navarre Cove (Kelly Cove) Zoning District: LR-IB Summary of Proposal: The Kelly Cove Homeowner's Association (the northerly 4 units of the 6- member Navarre Cove Homeowner's Association) propose to relocate their joint use dock system which has been in place since 1978. The existing 6-slip dock system extends from Outlot A, Navarre Cove, which is surrounded by Lot 3, Navarre Cove, the former site of the old "fire station" duplex which has been razed. Since Lot 3 is now being proposed to revert to single family status, the remaining four duplex unit owners would prefer to have a four slip shared dock system extending from their commons area which is known as Outlot A, Kelly Cove. List of Exhibits A - Joint Use Dock License Application B - Current Plat Map C-PlatofRLS 1428(1976) D - Plat of Kelly Cove (1979) and Plat of Navarre CTove (1984) E - Existing and Proposed Dock Layouts F - Selected Background Documents Background Chronology Prior to 1976, this area consisted of a single 6 acre parcel with a single family house and a two unit apartment building (the old fire station building). In 1976 the 6 acre parcel was divided into four RLS tracts, Tract A being approximately 3 acres in area and including the old fire station duplex; and Tracts B, C and D each becoming 1 acre single family lots further south along Kelly Avenue. It was noted in 1976 that a plan to construct two additional duplex buildings on Tract A would require a conditional use permit, which was feasible because the site proposed for duplexes was within 200' of commercial zoning. Request for Council Action continued Page 2 of 5 June 17, 1998 Proposed Joint Use Dock Relocation In 1977 a conditional use permit application was approved, allowing four additional umts (two duplex buildings) to be constructed on Tract A in addition to allowing the existing fire station duplex to remain. A decision on the proposed joint use dock to serve all 6 duplex units was left up in the air, pending the results of an LMCD moratorium. The two new duplex buildings were constructed on Tract A in 1977- 78. On March 30,1978 the City of Orono issued a joint use dock license to the "Kelly Avenue Holding Company" for one slip for each of six duplex dwelling units. That dock system was to be constructed near the entrance of the lagoon at the southwest comer of Tract A. Please review the staff memo and exhibits for Application #350 which provides some background to the discussions held regarding this initio joint use dock license. In 1979 Tract A was split into three lots, each containing an existing duplex building, plus two outlots: Outlot A for a joint use dock, located at the shoreline of Lot 3; and Outlot B, the platted lake bed which was then deeded to the City. The 1978-79 discussions regarding lake access for these six duplex units, revolved around a number of factors: 1.In total the six units had only 400' of shoreline in the LR-IB zoning district that required 140' of lot width and allowed one riparian "dock right" per lot; i.e. the 3-acre site would only qualify for two riparian "dock rights" if subdivided into two conforming widths single family lots. 2.City maps designated wetland along the shoreline of Lots 1 and 2, and allowing a dock to extend from Lots I and 2 would require a variance to the flood plain and wetlands ordinance which was then recently adopted. 3.A joint use dock providing one slip for each of the six duplex units would be of less impact than six individual docks. The impact of six slips, one for each of six duplex dwelling units, was considered a reasonable impact on the neighborhood and the lagoon. 4. Three individual docks limited to 5'6" width by 25' length, with two boats slipped at each dock, and such docks groujTed at the southwest end of the property, would be appropriate. In 1984, Lots 1 and 2 of Navarre Cove were replatted as "Kelly Cove" creating four Request for Council Action continued Page 3 of 5 June 17, 1998 Proposed Joint Use Dock Relocation house pads for the existing northerly duplex units, and one large commons outlot (Outlot A, Kelly Cove). The four northerly duplex units continued to use the joint use dock system extending from Outlot A, Navarre Cove. Since 1978 the City has annually issued a joint use dock license to the 6-member Navarre Cove Homeowner's Association. The most recent license (1997) allows six slips on three individual docks extending from Outlot A, each dock being 44' in length. This extension from 25' to 44' occurred during the drought in the late 1980s and was formalized by LMCD and the City in 1993. Current Proposal While Lot 3 in Navarre Cove just recently received approval for demolition and reconstruction of a new duplex, the owner of Lot 3 would prefer to eliminate Outlot A (the dock outlot) and make Lot 3 a single family lot. Lot 3 becomes much more marketable without the encroachment of Outlot A, and without having to accommodate the joint use dock for the four remaining duplex units. To this end, the four remaining duplex owners would like to move their four slips further north to extend from their own commons outlot. This appears reasonable but also raises some additional issues: 1. The proposed dock system will extend from an area that the City maps define as wetland and over which the City has a Conservation and Flowage Easement; however, staff has reviewed the status of the wetland, and it clearly is not as extensive as the old maps indicate. The area from which the new dock will extend is maintained as yard, contains mature trees, and obviously is high ground. The actual wetland boundary is much further west than the proposed dock location. In staffs opinion, the wetland is not a factor in this application. 2. Lot 3 as a conforming 1 acre/140’ width single family lot, would likely be allowed by LMCD to have as many as four slips and four boats, as long as all four boats were titled to the owners of Lot 3. The net result for the City is where there were six slips and six boats, there is now a potential for eight slips and eight boats. Council should weigh the potential impacts of four joint use dock slips plus a single family dock system, versus six joint use dock slips. Applicant is advised to contact the LMCD (471-9588) which also has jurisdiction over joint docks, to confirm what special restrictions or permits that body may require for this change. Request for Council Action continued Page 4 of 5 June 17, 1998 Proposed Joint Use Dock Relocation Joint Use Dock Ordinance Municipal Code Section 5.42 gives minimal standards for joint use docks. However, that section does state that "any association of riparian and/or non-riparian land owners within a subdivision adjacent to the lake which initiates a new joint use shall adhere to LMCD regulations and no such use shall have more than one boat slip per 50' of shoreline as measured by a straight line between the points at which the side lot lines meet the OHWL. Further, all such use shall adhere to the Shoreland Management Regulations of Section 10.56." The propK)sed use app>ears to mep the one slip per 50' of shoreline standard, since as measured on a straight line Lots 1 and 2 contam 220' of jvidth, which would allow up to four boats. Further, the proposed use appears to meet thbs^tond^d which disallows any use which creates the need for additional parking on any street right-of-way or additional parking stalls. Since the proposed four slips will be used by four adjacent land owners with pre-existing parking areas, there appears to be no impact on streets or right-of-ways. Further, there appears to be no need for additional hard surface areas. The proposed docks would appear to be located in one of the widest portions of the lagoon, hence no boat traffic problems are anticipated. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the application of the Kelly Cove Homeowner's Association to allow conversion of a six unit joint use dock to a four unit joint use dock, subject to dock design and location as proposed, and subject to ultimate legal combination of Outlot A and Lot 3 of Navarre Cove by the owner of Lot 3; and that the easements over Lot 3 and Navarre Cove Outlot A in favor of Lots 1 and 2 Kelly Cove be extinguished. Public Hearing Option The joint use dock license standards allow Council to call a public hearing at Council's discretion. This application was received on June 12, and is brought forward for Council's initial review without a resolution, pending Council action. One of Council's options would be to call for a public hearing if there is some perceived negative impact to the City or to other users of the lagoon. Such a hearing could be published for the July 13th Council meeting. f • Request for Council Action continued Page 5 of 5 June 17, 1998 Proposed Joint Use Dock Relocation Options for Action 1.Grant conceptual approval, subject to conditions, and direct staff to draft an appropriate resolution. Table for further information or in order to provide notification to surrounding affected property owners for a public hearing, if Council chooses to hold a hearing. Conceptually deny, providing staff with suggested findings to incorporate into a denial resolution. 4.Other. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Provide applicants and staff with direction regarding the proposed joint use dock relocation and conversion from 6 units to 4 units. X;\APPS\WPW1N60\WPDOCS\B*Z\MIKEUOINTUSEWAVRCOV2.MEM CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION Date of Notice: 6-24-98 Kelly Cove Homeowners Assoc, c/o Austin Evans 2497 Kelly Avenue Excelsior, MN 55331 COPIES: TYPE OF APPLICATION; Joint Use Dock License DATE OF MEETING: June 22, 1998 COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION: Tabled because neither applicant nor a representative was present. TWs item will be rescheduled for the Monday, July 13,1998 Council meeHng which begins at 7:00 p.m. CITY OF ORONO P.O. BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 473-7357 LICENSE YEAR 19 ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE APPLICATION Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.42 t A Date Form Sent by City Staff Date Application Returned to City ^ Fee Received $ 7^."*7. ^•. > . ,; •.•By Employee Section 5.42, Subdivision 2. XtCENSE REQUIRED - It is unlawful for any (group or association of persons or families, more .than two in numberi whether incorporated or not) to engage Or paitidpate in^ use (of My lakeshore property) without first having obtained .'aJicehse therefor from’ Ae dity"’‘ '■ PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY MARCH 1 OF THE LICENSE YEAR. ^ ASSOCIATION INFORMATION . : : ' r • . 1. Association title or name (if any)/rgl-iy Cor^ tf oRot^O Lake Bay ’ * • ‘ » . V, • ' ‘ . • * . ■ \ , Person responsible for this application:,• * IrH! ^ n^oName Austin H • ^VAttS_____ Phone__ Mailing Address MA/ 6''S’33/ Relationship to association 'PRCS Association is (check applicable items): . unincorporated homepwnei^’s group. .X incorporated Homepwner|s Association. ___ unincorporated club or recreation group. ___ incorporated club or recreation group. . Page 1 of 5 5. 6. 7. 9. Principal purpose of joint use dock is (check applicable items): ^ provide boat mooring and lake access for residential property. ____ provide swimming access, beach, or offshore dock. ____ provide a club or association gathering place for activities. Dock is located on (check applicable item): ____ one member’s private property. <Mtiirmrnt of ontlot owned in common. ____ property leased by the group/association. ____ property owned by the group/association. List Dock location and ownership information: Street address Qli.^7-» 3^3 AVgNUif, MN iTiTSSl Legal property description gutt ^oT /^. k^LLy _______________ PID# Listed property owner(s) 4v>vtfrTy — fiWMBTTV rLJtlj A-s e*»/nt<»cT Names of abutting lakeshore property owners: (North/WesO______/v^oT __________________________________ (Name + Address) fSouth/EasO P. HtsT 3^ JLMr^ SiterT^ MtJ (Name +. Address) 7 Names of other affected property owners: kiFik'j h\nSh/t/£, (Name + Address) (attach sheet if necessary) Insurance Coverage - The jointly used dock is insured by One of the fbhv. aig: '____■ property owiier’^ homeowner’s policy'. ' ■ • > separate group/association owned policy. List the following information: ^Name of insured Cjt>y£ Bf- (ifotfo \jh/h^ Name of insurance carrier *m/f Name of insurance agency Aulu ^ Policy No. iw’xrr ______Effective date of coverage / Amount of coverage: Public liability, per person, per occurrence $ /, 60», — Public liability, per occurrence % Lo^ oo O Page 2 of 5 10. Security and policing of the jointly used dock and property is provided by (check applicable items): ____ fencing ____ security lighting ^ property owner’s presence ____contract security service _____other (specify) • _______ DOCK INFORMATION 11. List Dock Use Area Specifications: Width of shoreline: * ft. Length of main dock from shore ft Dock setbacks from side property lines at shore: 12. Dock Construction (check applicable items): it o ft. and % s" . ft. , . . . >0<4r/ Witc AtTMAiM■>: seasonal dock (relocated or replaced each year) ,h permanent piling with seasonal deck _ wo^'den decking ____ metal decking permanent piling and decking 13. List Doca' Accessories: Number fire extinguishers available at the dock in tiot^______ NumUr c*^ preservers available at the dock LoeATgj) />✓ _________ 14. List numb ■ of slips in each category ("slips" includes boat lifts): Transient (day use only) slips______ Transient (day use) off-shore buoys Permanent moorage slips Permanent moorage off-shore buoys_____ Dry storage (rack) slips __________ Maximum number of boats at the dock____ 15. List number of off-street parking spaces available for users of the joint use dock. Parking, if provided must not be separated from the dock by any public road. spaces. <* . EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL 16. Shoreline is protected by (check applicable items): ___ stone rip rap ___ wood seawall ___ metal seawall concrete jeawall K. grass and vegetation only other (specify) 17. Depth of water at shoreline: Q ft; at 50 ft. out: ^ fi\ at 100 ft. out: ICHfr ?? Page 3 of 5 REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application: A. DOCK PLAN - ALL APPUCATIQNS A dock plan, drawn to scaled showing the shoreline width of this property, the side property lines and the location, layout and dimensions of all docks, slips and buoys. If off-street parking, dry storage or other on-land functions are intended, these also should be shown on the plan. B. UNINCORPORATED GROUPS OR ASSOCIATIONS i. A list of the names and mailing addresses of all members and/or slip users. > ' . . >• . 2. A certified copy of the by-laws or agreement for joint use. Note: This copy fs not required if the applicant initials and certifies the following statement: This is a rCnewll application and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same by-laws orM I •• ^ agreement originally made in > I. ^ * * ’•-v V‘. (state year) and on file with the City. C. Applicant's initials INCORPORATED CLUBS OR ASSOCIATIONS (^0/^ 1. A list of the names, mailing addresses and titles of all corporation officers. 2.. > .A statemeAt ^ to the total number of members in the club or association. A members 3.A certified copy of the articles of incorporation and by-laws of the corporation. Note: These copies are not required if the applicant initials and certifies the following statement: "This is a renewal application and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same articles of incorporation and/or by-laws as originally made or last amended in_______(state'year) and ■ on file with the City." ___________ Applicant’s initials D. ANNUAL LICENSE FEE - ALL APPUCATIQNS Joint Use'Dock-License Application Fee according to the current City Fee Schedule S• • INITIAL APPUCATION FEE RENEWAL JOINT USE FEE, per year PLUS SLIP FEE for each permanent moorage slip, lift, dry stack, or buoy ^ slips @ 2.00 each TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION $ $ $ 20.00 Page 4 of 5 LATE FEE - Renewals Application for renewal of licenses shall be made no later than Match 1 of the license vear The gtty {ball npt accept renewal lieense applications received after March 1 unless the /nniie.;;;;;; IS accompamed bv a late fee of ----------aepiication REVIEW PROCEDTJllFf When a complete application is received, the application will be reviewed by the City Council rvfmillifS! applications, also by the Planning Commission and Marina Committee. The Council will pass upon the application after complete review. TM SUBJECT DOCK MAY BE INSTALLED AND/OR OPENED FOR USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE UCENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pu^t to Section 5.42 of Ae Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono rLicense Application, and agrees and authorizes the S ?o Srf ° " employees and agents to enter upon the property at any reasonable time to perform safety and code compliance inspections. Signed Date It, /<?9i? City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, W S5323 (612)473-7357 06/16/98 14:35:39 CustoKr: NONE LICENSE - 0T)€R BUS. I B 78.00 78.00 JT USE DOCK KEU.Y COVE HOICONE 1 B 0.00 SUBTOTAL TAX TOTAL SALE Check Received CHANEE OERKt 03 TRAfGI 7031 0.00 78.00 0.00 78.00 78.00 0.00 Page 5 of 5 r KELLY COVE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 2497 Kelly Avenue Excelsior, MN 55331, USA Telephone (612)471-1170 Fax (612) 471-1184 June 11,1998 Mr. Michael P. Gaf&on Senior Planning Coordinator City ofOrono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55402 R ' M\ \ ' 199.*^ C\TY Or O. ,0.‘. J Dear Mr. Gaf&on: 1 enclose the following; A new Annual Joint Use Dock License Application. A Dock Plan shoi^g location on property. A Layout Plan showing size of docks etc. A statement showing the names of association officers and the total number of members. Certified copies of the articles of incorporation and by-laws of the corporation Members of this association currently enjoy docking rights on Outlot A, Navarre Cove, which is owned by Navarre Cove Homeowners Association. The members of that association comprise the 4 members of Kelly Cove Homeowners association and Mr. Bradley A. Hoyt the owner of Lot 3, Block 1, Navarre Cove. The members of Navarre Cove Homeowners Association are negotiating to convey Outlot A, Navarre Cove to Mr. Bradley A. Hoyt, dissolve Navarre Cove Homeowners Association and transfer 4 docks from Outlot A, Navarre Cove to Outlot A, Kelly Cove. I shall be grateful therefor if a Joint Use Dock License can be granted to this association subject to the members of Navarre Cove Homeowners Association completing the negotiations referred to in the previous paragraph. Please call me with any questions. Yours sincerely. Austin H. Evans President J r KELLY COVE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 2497 Kelly Avenue Excelsior, MN 55331, USA Telephone (612) 471 -1170 Fax (612) 471-1184 The names of currently appointed officers are: Austin H. Evans President 2497 Kelly Avenue Excelsior. MN 55331 I hereby certify that the number of members in this association are four, comprising each owner of the properties legally described as: Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 All of Block 1, Kelly Cove and known as: 2497 Kelly Avenue, Excelsior, MN 55331 2499 Kelly Avenue, Excelsior, MN 55331 2501 Kelly Avenue, Excelsior, MN 55331 2503 Kelly Avenue, Excelsior, MN 55331 t TUNif /), uuvI LUI ^ r a. 3( lor) 2 II J.ll?)IT 90^ IS 111)II)(H1> Ji J t n II IIS) Sl tt \r% tn • • 93 n <114 «? JL S 90 7>9B ^1 .1 ‘ JO JJ ^19 (SI)(92) .# (9» « P( •s" (91) m ;( ir (9» K •#9*^ ”2 (M) •■s II? ri42) .1 •9 1 m ;”2 A 9)9 9 9 /• JL • ^ 2664.61 RES (99) s JO jg J)JO 30i •• ? 24*isr nr 2? •/ 2S^(OS)2 2 coovr g • •••••••••<2 O 1' -*V> 104.9 Ooc NQ 94?4W !zr S 31 26)^ (!H2?!2S) ^ Il»grii^. R '1® B " Xi« " JtmJ, I.**((*«V^ a «mil’' ■•■'XSP Kg ^ 7/Sttl f^)| j p^o r .' ;#1 S1 SHGRELIN^ ■« * *9‘OOC M> in4«n M4*<a ‘•«7 ‘«3' »•!fHGSAII-N6 4 I w -C57)<2 <»)»> - --------s ii JT’io****^* 5 MC O VUM-f («€"*« ijawT^" 54l4 7i '^'^^HsrNVsp-j^ i 3iiy ie4.fii (34) .-.W(^ <t so Harsrivf •>L/< • * * ^(55) DOC »« mSiM 8 C 7'9.4| M? e^sx7f^(^ 'je)^"' NoI'^T Po<=-#=-s COi. P/-AT /i/lA'P i; J t ;•f‘.• t ?1 > ht^mmrk 7irr<mt Cmf^ Jtk MH£-s 7> r,A0/»€i^ tanimmrk l0^tCm9ik$im REGISTEREO LAND SURVEY NO. o SCA lJ£ im #W#e»4a OATi : B0mf‘injM ^Aotv/t o Jonoi^ iron mcnumonr Kr- 5 0; -.t)' EO0.OO AY Rp^rrjtf^ 9^ XN V? '. ,‘C?v •> ^ fl.OC IC) \z *%^ # TRACI c Jydkimt fmdmwrir Bmtk m%mAk if m tkm 4M cmnerrie mmfR mf —»v»#^ ## mtfmtmkfmfA mi Cf^'f Bmjf fSEBThmf^AYNVtf^ iLirf 1 Cmt 9^ MmtQ y Mmtmm mmh* fhvmiim h 9J^ M iMfr DhvUmn ##. AmAtiS,i97E M9f flUU ^ emmt, AfmrB •/PBf, ^ Jb >. •j •j f'-j 5 d /v'at X Ksrtlgr Mrtlfjr that In aecordanca with the provltiont of ChapUr 508» Hinnatoty SUtutaa .of 1949 as sMtodad, I hara •urrtjad th* follovlT^-daacrlbad tract of land in tha County of Rannapln and tha Staia of Hlnnasota, to vltt Tract C, Raglstarad Land Suraay f>o, U22f filaa of tha Raglstrar of Tltlaa County of Rannapln, the teundarias of vhleh haaa baan aarkad by Judicial land- ■arka sat pursuant to Torrana Casa No* 169S6, and that tha aunray shown haraon is a eorraet dallnaatlon of aald aurray, dated this KS k L day of ^ 1976. ^ y j/l Gordon Klnn. Raylatratior No. 6064 land Surrayor and Plannar Lon^ UkS| Mlnnaaota ORONO, NIlflfBaTA This Raflatarad Und Surray was approwad and aeeapUd^ tha City Minna so la, at a regular naatlng tharaof ha Id this of , cm COUNCIL OF THE lor^n R. Coffin tha City of Orono, ____, 1976. . MINNESOTA Mayor Adainiatrator nKAFCa DrnSlOK, Rannapln County, Mlnnaaota I haraby eartlfy that thara are no dalinouant tazaa for all years prior to this day of . 1976. Vamon T. Roppa, Wractor by . for land dascrlbad on this plat. Satad ________ Tax Clark HSNKSPIR OOCNTT SUR7E70R Pursuant to Chaotar 810, Minnesota Laws of 1969, this Raglstarad Land Zy3Tt%y has baan approirad this 1976. Py___________________________________________________ day of Alvar R. Free*^an, Hennepin County Surveyor RECISTIUR Of TITLES, Rannapln County, HlnnesoU I hereby certify that tha within Raglstared Und Survey Ko. 1976, at o'clock . and that tha two copies were coepared with tha original and were found to be true and correct was filed in this office this day of copies thereof. Usyna A. Johnson, Raglstrer of Titles, by Dsiaity (2. UJ li UJ 5? •J U fijer OF OyJB- I II / c CTi .J« It: \ \ L r / COMMUNICATIONS jM™ ORIGINAL DOCUMRNT IG OR POOR OUALITV <\*lly Avenue Ibldliu Co. 2S0S Kelly Avenue rape : i • T I • ii PLVCiING CWfnsSICN MXTLVH - October 3, 1977 Ibn Lintbay ai^d John Ahl presented pronossl for conditional use permit for two additional duplex units. Planning Comission reminded developer that duplex credit is linit^ to TOO ft. distance from comercially zoned district. Dnn Lindsay continued compliance. ir. Lindsay also rtquested dock ri^ts for all three duplexes (one existing and 2 new iButs) for a total of six resi^tial imits. Mr. Lindsav thoi«ht this was previously addressed by Couicil. The Council minutes of Julv 26. 1976 (copv enclosed) do not reflect this however. The Cotmission informed Ifr. Lindsay of Orono’s riparian rights poliev which is currently related to lot width **equirciients. The developer was instructed to suhmit sw additioTiil data before could address the dock rights issue. The length of shoreline on the subject uarcel «mild be the detemining factor on this riparian rl|#its issue. Mayor van Nest informed the developer that the UCn was considering lirifing riparian rights to a shoreline distance of 100 ft. In any devrlopncnt, ea,i IDO ft. of shoreline «x>uld constitute one riparian right. rianninp Cnmission recorrerded anproml of thiplex comlitional use pemt for tvfo new buildings with the imdcrstanding that dock approiml is not includetl, hut rust be addressed after more data is submitted. Ca:CCIL •OdTI.'.’n - October 11, 1977 "" \pprn\x>d conditional use pomlts for PRO and duplex erx-dit for two now duplex :>iiildings (4 iBiits tot.nl) within 200 feet of tlie comcrctal zone. Directed staff to reyiev tV |xnrk dcdici*- .. n fee and collect tlic correct amount due before issuing huildinq permits. Kill >Tview tlie joint dock only upon separate reuuest in lieht 0*^ the L*!Cn moratoriur ‘^lAlT • October 14, 1977 '•••vtr’A'' park tec status. |-i ’ii^Vet i.nlue of land r|p;i,n;ip before division J lots, I ncre tiensity • 1'’* foe •• Sin.ST) calc. • lots X Sli''' "’.nx. ■ SIOUP .ns collected I.......'an.er Value of l.nnd. Tract \ »• !rit-s acre*. •• ’’V fee • le';*; ^p'. ••.reals -.or 'niiMir.r It T.v • A* • •. . * ” r'*, ‘V/ L-; r:Vi • ■*. . . n -• • • , < .•••.I jXUf.'.V.-.-f r TO: FROM: DATE: Planning Coinmission and Council Henry F. Muhich, Zoning Administrator February 2, 1978 »_ _.f ^^ j rr T A'iJ SUBJECT: Kelly Avenue Holding Company - Joint Use Dock Application for 1978. ^plication for multiple dock license for 1978 for mooring of 6 boats. This is for the pUi.pose of providing dock space for each of the 6 dwelling un ts in the three duplexes on the Kelly Avenue Holding Company property. Exhibit B (sketch) - notes indicate 400' shoreline. Exhibit C (su^ey) - dimensions noted on survey line adjacent to shoreline appear to confirm the 400' shoreline. This property is zoned LR-lB (1 acre). Minimum lot width and shoreline requirement is 140'. From the zoning standpoint only 2 docks would be permitted. Some of the other agencies are currently considering regulating docks by a shoreline footage factor. If we should adopt this policy the number of permitted slips would vary accordingly. PLANNING COMMISSION - February 27, 1978 Mr. Lindsay, representing the developer, was present. The Zoning Administrator explained the proposal as submitted. He expressed concern over the shoreline site plan Indicating 6 individual docks. He felt this plan could provide mooring of 12 boats on only 400 ft. of shoreline. The shoreline and lot width requirement in this one acre zoning district is 140 ft. The total length of shoreline on the subject property lacks 20 ft. from the requirement as regulated by our current policy. The Planning Commission recommended approval of 3 docks for the mooring of 6 boats. One boac for each of the 6 dwelling units in the 3 duplexes on the parcel. Each of the 3 docks would be limited to a width of 5' 6" and a length of 25 ft. The Planning Commission did not stipulate the distance between the docks or specific location of the 3 docks. COUNCIL - March 16, 1978 Conceptually approved 6 slips per Planning Commission recommendations. COUNCIL - March 30, 1978 Approved resolution authorizing dock permit & license. r RESOLUTION NO. 892 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A JOINT USE DOCK PERIfiT AND LICENSE FOR KELLY AVENUE HOLDING COMPANY WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted zoning ^®^®shore regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and City Council have considered the application of Kelly Avenue Holding Company for Joint Use Dock construction and use of six (6) slips on their property known as 2505 Kelly Avenue; Tract A, RLS 1428; and WHEREAS, Tract A, RLS 1428 is occupied by 3 duplex structures containing 6 residential units as authorized by Conditional Use Permits issued October 11, 1977; and WHEREAS, Tract A, RLS 1428 contains approximately 400 lineal feet Lake Minnetonka shoreline; and WHEREAS, the Orono Zoning Code Section 34.440 authorizes private docks subject to the requirement of the C’-ono Municipal Code Chapter 74, Joint Use of Lake Facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves a Joint Use Dock Permit and 1978 license for Kelly Avenue Holding Company subject to the following conditions; 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Maximum of 6 boats to be moored at this property. Maximum of 3 dock structures, each structure a maximum size 6" X 25' 0", as shown and located on Exhibit A attached. Installation and use of more than one dock structure on this property will be subject to a Joint Use Dock License which must be renewed annually and which renewal may be subject to revised conditions according to then current dock regulations. Issuance of this permit and license is subject to the approval of all other agencies having jurisdiction, including the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and the MN Dept, of Natural. Resources. Issuance of this permit and license does not vest nny permanent rights for multiple dock or moorage on this property. 6.Kelly Avenue Holding Company shall review and approve of this Resolution, which approval shall be indicated by the endorsement of an authorized representative hereon, and shall cause an original copy of this Resolution to be filed as a permanent covenant in the chain of title of the property, such .filing to occur within 30 days of the approval of the Resolution by the City Council. AGREED: - - - -/<; ^ KelJLy Avenue Holding Compan Dated this day of • March , 19 78 . ^ K William B. Van Nest, Mayor ATTEST: Walter ft: Ben son. Clerk/Adminis tra to r L L*> •/r V -^inissbxvv i'l^RH' _____________ ii •• #». # •• ■ -•• , '>t^ #•/ ;• •• TO: FROM: SATE: SUBJECT: • * s V * • r' . Planning Cots&iaaion and Council ’ •* ^^JIBS €> 0 ► ' i ■‘ •-• • • ••' » ■. *-• •. •; • ', .•''4 V- Jaanao A. Mabua&h, Aaot. Zonii^ Adfld^tntm Decenbar 21, 1978 ' MQ Jamaa K. Lindoay, 2505, Kelly -SKETCH sivTiM ■ ■■ • ■ -'‘V ■ ■;,;■•■,"' Vv m ■,v-*V.fv/ fc'iiV Ai Mr Introco^Ar®"*^ proposes dividing let I of tbo Kelly Avanue^'^di^l^^fe^C Co Jiree one-acre lota. Plaaaa revlev aoolicatien but lot dinenaions are not coa^leto and will be revleiMd. befo^ii^'> for Qzieting buildlnga on Lote IvAadS^presentation. The aetbacka . .? I - ‘ ‘vyj’-C^r •-i.,*:.^.«.-. .i' j^-.. •-•. V... .'{ 0 Access road - The existing driveway will appear aa a private:*oedy|pi^K ‘‘-jK easement serving Lota I and 2. ’v!?# ““ ■ S^“ sssiS® i' ’ -«vicbf ->' .*' S‘\ Mgarian riy>ts - ^e applicant requests a joint dock for each lot (one dock serving two dwelling units). If Planning wtnmlssion approves^ then a variance to the Flood / • ?i ” Wetlands Management Oedinance must be given (similar to one Issued for the Farm at Long Lake and Victoria Graon). Lot 1 is involved; Lot 2 appears to have 15'-20' of available lakeahore but th2 setback request of 10' will take most of it, and Lot 3 would not be involved. ^ Staff recommends a private outlet over the existing dock araa. This alternative will lessen the impact on wetland and dismiss the need for a variance. Kear yard setback variance - Ordinance 3A.A50 Required: Proposed: Variance: 30* 6' 24' - SOX m m f ifetem c. ORIGINAL DOCOMBMT “ “TT“ w-%; V.v f- ^7. •: • ‘ • rF-V* BWM^CZjftUpl^y. *>• ,_V***^' W^'^:-'' - •■■' . - ■•'-.y • ' • ‘1^ *• v'-< '-'I*♦. ? '>*■’ ' * y »-.,V<4 V, ’*. ^y^ '. ' •M .s^'i .V- .•^‘-tV'VVj 2 *T •.’ y'L'> .• • ? •«» i ‘ .• :'*-iw> H > ^Vj ‘ ; ▼.••i-.J • " ,\^n Deccisber 21, 1978 Jfioas K. Lin^«y 2505 Kally Avemia Subdivision Pago 2 f 5^s4c-^*^ ^'^4. •j ■- PLANNING COMMISSION M2ETINC - -JANUARY - - - ■ • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Avenue Duplexes with applicant: 1. 2. 3. 4. Need for an accurate determination of iratlaBdiikf;;*^ >"* - - ^- -. a - - -7; • :.*'! *1 Asmol *"innan ■■ nnm f mrilii»*'R'lRO applicant to be aware of significance Question of Lot 3 duplex being located district to be resolved. .*; W' i STAFF REC0»JENDATI0N - K\RCH 24, 1979 Staff recoHOTends preliminary approval of the three lot Kally Avouie Duplex Company's plat subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. Developers enter into a Conservation and Flowage EaassMnt with the City. - , j Joint dock to remain serving all three lots because of wetlands along lakeshore. , Duplex on Lot 3 will requite a front yard setback variance of 29 PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING - APRIL 9, 1979 Planning Cor-mission recommended preliminary plat approval as proposed subject to the following conditions: ^; !=;{ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Docks to remain as a licensed joint use dock, 1 s.'^p per unit, total 6, wich Ouclot A platted to provide the common access. This avoids Construction of docks across the wetlands. Platting of drainage casement over wetlands on proposed Lots I & 2 with flowage and conservation easement to the City. Duplex on Lot 3 to continue as a recognized legal non-conforr'lng use becai'se it is located beyond 200' from the cotnaerclal Also recognized is existing substandard front yard setback of 4 (a variance of 31 f^.''• Access to lots I A 2 to rrm-iln as constructed with a private oasenrnt provided to l.of I ov«*r Lot 2. Platting and de.llr u i.'n of dr iitvigo and Mtlllrv easements alon:*. ai; lot lines except tlte sboreWne. ;» 1 i r: tf: ll (**un- S^^^,^OMMUNICATION.i.M>n.A n..,...„.. >RI€ain«ti, DOCUMENTirr?iTi iTTr.rr^ .: ^ 'VVi;.V. V. .. - •; ^ :.:V! .. y ■ rV*' i :. • .->’ r; •.;. •:: .« . V-1- venue .... .-r ................................. .• n' - «;i.».'• ' v^^ V v.:VV’::rO* ', -, ■•.:-..-vi<T5v' ^<-Sf.iy%;v-;,'v ■ * • ’- ’■»*S»r' r ’• ’ •** » • * * • » ! V: > ^ •L /-yy/. ••.; * *.• - ^ %%. ' .... :r :>:»■■ '' A • * ^ •- . - . . .*-.V.5 ■.*•• Lel*>loU«l ......... ■' V V f *:/y. •. * - • ‘^S <•*' ■ .' '«* ' ■ sf'^ ^ S.I S V •» ' .. .V> 'I-it •’,) -,f -•. - • » » . V ‘I . • • .^ • •■ , • , . -.. . . , I.^ , • . . . . - •• * v%; i '* • • ' . . . • 1o 0-7 JUl. 2 7 1993 Cl rv Or OnCiVQ Mr. Ward E. Edwards 2474 Carman St Wayzata, MN 55391 JC/O/ Zi>,mQ tJUCHA^L p. 6APFAC/V S'W^J'4 <3A- P(-A AjAf^AT6 dry oP ^yv'curS'^ cs /fufoUM-roTA/ flS'caruMS^rP/lT6dA/J> ^(S^AAD^f^<o Ct-</)/U©/A;« 77/<if~ Pfi-OPOP^SV DOCK Ll^SI^S^ APPOCAnc/U PCJSA^Tr<SD fi’Y n:U^ c(yr&' HOM^oLUA/Spy Zi<Cit)C//^723A/ POR COM of^ ^ iJ&U) c(~ SIA^P JO//PT US^ Oodp. &-X-7^0/Ar<2 rfPcC, tU^ cAGOOM. S'l'x p^l^NS uucTH 0eO<S' OAT L.if\iBooM fy/iB'o£E^s£v_'tq rtus ppSSP6S^Ad—-Tti^ A/Air(7 oar?. -JT^S' PA£^ p.i^COMM^OAT/yAJP'' 2«S>AfA'raA^. rfl§R&~ IS MO A SATO A/ pOR. 00<y'^ ^KT^J> S6 ' /hTO ~n\^ di SOffA/. 'iAiJ LXJILL MQT&' TH/I'T D^PTt^ Op U/A t^ 00^ ATdT <LHAArG&^ pvunM rt^6' S‘WR(r. TtiAm<- 'iou poR 'ju^ oPPSkTanny ~r<s- ^YPR^S OUIA. COATC^-AAJS THtS Docp. LRHCOT: S / Aras P^o/. LyJoddj <^tiivdju^<~ni' Q issr r r •-i.* * . \.J TO; M-LCHAm- P. <2> A Fl-fi-O A/' JIJI. ? 1553 f C-Al a/A/^A/G (O. l. 0,.0 ctry 0)/^ c>algia/o /\ J'j’ /ic<rc4v aru'^r 7o^ajt us^ /)oclk (j? (T TCi^ FA A. OCAT ///^<S ~F-1^ ^ LA iS'd'O/t/-vk!^d^ Th&siS^ A/>^<^ a xF^^uClK.^ P R^CkJG}Z / o0> /ZULU _____ 0/=^ Tlh^^ fiOC^S' itOLlL S'TJLI lLTU/0-&' oLaS'<^ TO ZT^g' t<M<s- O^th of WS' cjjA'zSX^ (^p- Aocics- hAi^<S<^i^ rAon 5; 5 'jt-iSASr IS Aj-o ASV'Af^TAtsS" ~rcr BAuKr&(AL& 'Zfi^'Pac^ OUT s^‘ T/V<s~ T/Y(JA6^. TU^ D^ni OF TUS- tvAr&'A. 'Oo^ rm' cliAr^/L at pAop^sm TITS' .S'' PmP 4'T' zS''oaT, S' Sb FFiDiA SHO^e^.Ar MW tz-llt' Pfi-OfdSSU OtTLK. ~it-l^ ■■ (P /AT Ti4(s AncM oar.S^-' /Ajra FAJS" cs; fj N~ilU zAi 0, I IHL^i f viJsa (J^SOOAT C^COA DUPiiUAiQ LS Arc/r IT L<! Sy Yc^ '' /A/ PH0UJ^M6 pMw rmAF) limits opals' to a ^Z(uS u\'&7T CAtLQctiXS’^ Oji^'^^U^ /M, C, PisP S-2. ^filLOOfirs that S)acK lJU 'THS' LA&oOAr- SS&' PFChS TWO pOfL flttLil AiJt^ patwmt : J r I ' ^.r?- h ■■•!. * I- ■V i • ••• M I ' A I 1 • ' : I ! I XU-1 It.I ' l-r^—J 1—•..r * > . »* r ' r •■• .••• ■ I ^1 / K II- ( nZ-k»u-4- 4^ -]••:«- M 4- -i- ■ ’ ! ;..• I ! ! |i- '■ .1- I ‘ ' _____-______________________1.. .^ m li «—■ ! t -...4- ..I J -1 . n'* |5 ?]S)I I ;y - A : ,s-i I ! * -I— j; 4.:±. t ! i I ( i ! t '• ♦—< \ \ ---f « I-. •%• * { # ‘ • « <a * ^ * * ‘ ^ —7 -f 1 • • floy #% 1 1 * i • L t :% :□m xj i ' 9 *•• • 774/,? IS C?tA/3. p P-0 P/JJ’^ ^ar&v at ; ; t ' f^lUM UnL^ ; ^ST BOUArfffi-^. ■ ■ ■■■ CcmT^ LVAU<: pUbP^'^ ; • •• »- ,.. I 1 1 1 1 1 1 • i ♦ 1 ! t 1 - i w ••> ‘ 1•• « 4 •• 1 1 • • i( i i .« i1 w. , I ‘ t I.«* « I • I " I — I ..i— i I ... I f ' i . • < '» r TUJkJ CA tCOmP CO CfJ TfiA r tH(s s TAA-r At 0 OUT (TAfi-y y$j'' '^OA/ Dock S TJO-UC tu (0‘ f^JdaM. -tH€^ AJ6T \ ^ \ ^ THS' OgU< B£ Niove-D AM^He^ 'TH^ ^ST-C-TOUjA/^ KSLLV. C-OU^ 5^r ^£7/^^ O jqc O tg AiAi^e B6rr^ , ^ T(^6- euAV^c- LA^CO aJ 5/VJ/6r^^' (rtUi Ut/Li- PA<3v/08“ Mo^<?' lUsaM pHill. 6oKts (A t BI^ajt op pii.6fia6St) Ooc^ S‘U£MdTrt±-j) fivj: fdO^ ■~2.^.7<^ ^DtUAfdOP -2V-<Qc'- c/)/LA jlAA/ «i7T Q'd3 ‘6 ue>fV^ fl)eS3/' PY70 S^t"/: -7/iy ^7/-0/0/ k ■ A I « '/ July 21.1998 Mayor j£.bbour and Merr.bftrs of the City Council City of Orono 2750 Kelly Parkway PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 RE: Kelly Cove Homeowners Associates Joint Use Dock License Application Dear Mr. Mayor and Members of the City Council: I have reviewed the application made by Kelly Cove Homeowners Association for a Joint Use dock license. I/we support the application and the issuance of the joint use dock license to Kelly Cove Homeowners Association. My/our property is located directly on the Kelly Cove Lagoon. Date 30 3t'V.d 3^'tfd!DiS diDId3.dnS St’Steit' 86ST/i3/iO * July 21.1998 Mayor Jabbour and Members of the City Council City of Orono 2750 Kelly Parkway PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 RE: Kelly Cove Homeowners Associates Joint Use Dock License Application Dear Mr. Mayor and Members of the City Council: I have reviewed the application made by Kelly Cove Homeowners Association for a Joint Use dock license. t/we support the application and the issuance of the joint use dock license to Kelly Cove Homeowners Association. My/our property is located directly on the Kelly Cove Lagoon. Address: Date USERS;SU^/TCJ/PERS0^4AUL-KELLY £0 3£ivd 3£'Vdi:iiS diDId3.dl"lS er&KiLf ^r:60 ssei/ic/io Superior Storage LLC FACSIMILE transmittal SHEET TO ■%aM-DATE:?/:7A& FROM ■ ^ awb!f. T«u»fKW.»ltm*ycoouiBlalonn»ti'>'>»*>kb rONEIDENTIAUTV NOTICE: PUut oil it »h« mtiuif ynu ncttytA , Uui^eiimili U out the iotcwW rtcipiMt. you »rtCONFUJEl^ lA*^ conlMtotal compiny eontmuoicu.oA B the r«der ^ ^ Numb« of P.B.» b*i»g mcluding this p»g« 3 original will be sent 1st Class mail Original will be sent overnight. Yes if checked □ Yes if checked □ T*^*tructiofm j ^<xLJ- OlkL L'OLCM/iiL. fC^4 Q.cr\j<- Ucry<- PLEASE OIBFCT ANY FAX TRANSMISSION Tqij612) 473-4548. TO imd BWdOiS ii01d3dns 601 Carlson Parkway • Suite 350 Minnetonka. Minnesota 55305 (612)449-5755 ♦ Fax (612)473*4548 6t'St ’£Z.t' it?'60 866T/iC/iO er//'i-7/199S 13:27 473454S SUPERIOR STOPAOE PAGE 02 4} TODD C. JONES 3555 COUNTY ROAD 44 MINNETRISTA, MN 55364 6124721218 July 27.1998 Mayor Jabbour and City Council Mombors City of Orono 2750 Kelly Parkway Orono, MN 55356 RE; Kelly Cove Homeowners Association of Orono Joint Use Dock License Application Mayor Jabbour and City Council Members, I am the fee owner of 2501 Kelly Avenue and contract for deed vendor for 2503 Kelly Avenue, and therefore, a member of the Kelly Cove Homeowners Association. I am providing rny comments on the above mentioned dock license application as a member only. With respect to the application for a Joint use dock license application, I offer the following comments in support of granting the license. Location of Dock/Navigation Issues: The proposed location and configuiation of the docks creates a wider navigation channel within the lagoon. The current dock location maintains approximately 94' in clearance while the proposed dock provides for approximately 105’ of clearance (please see attached sketch). To put this in perspective, the narrows bridge channel, according to the LMCD, is approximately 75 ’ in width. This ic clearly a positive impact. Impact on Most Effected Neighbor. The proposed dock location and configuration locates the docks further away from the property and actual dwellings of what I would consider the two most effected neighbors. (Richard Edwards, 2480 Carman Street and Charles and Candice Nadler, 2509 Kelly Avenue). The Nadlers in particular, have virrltten you In support of the dock application as submitted. This is clearly a positive impact. Smaller Docks: The current docks are permitted by the City of Orono and the LMCD at 44’ In length with sufficient beam to accommodate the largest of boats. The docks as proposed are 32’ in length and 13’ in width. This is clearly a positive impact. 1. 2. 07/27/1993 13:27 4734548 SUPEPIOP 8T0PA':^E Page 03* Mayor Jabbour and City Council Members City of Orono July 27.1998 Page 2 4. 5. 6 The dock application, as proposed, exceeds all minimum standards established by the City of Orono municipal code (Section 5,42) and other criteria including: Exceeds the requirement for 1 boat per 50 ’ No additional hardcover No additional parking required (a) (b) (c) 5). This is not a precedent setting issue. Aesthetics-. The current wood docks (in poor condition) would be replaced with riew, well- oroanized Crepeau type docks. For the first time, 75% of the Kelly Cove townhomes are owner occupied with the final unit currently tor sale. Therefore, more than ever, pride of ownership exists at the Kelly Cove Townhomes. This is clearly a positive impact. The current application is by the Kelly Cove Homeowners AssoclaUon. ^ members, not by the owner of Lot 3 Navare Cove (Hoyt). I believe this application should be reviewed and approved based solely on the merits of the application as submitt^ by Kelly Cove Homeowners Association and not conditional on actions or conditions placed upon an adjoining landowner. Thank you for your consideration, Yours truly, odd C. Jones USER5«UC/TC4/PERS0NAUU-00CK r I V Of»Al#uc< INO UTILITY CASCMC mts Skjwm thus • -V/Vf 1 ■ 1 1 1J J 9 9 BfiNO 100 fttJ in WIDTH A mo aojoiminc lor u*<(.Cis orMCiiMiir shown on fm PLAT ^/e/- tkraj,a>* o/t V, tfH «*«i ^0 3^'9d 3S-^dOiS d01d3-dns 8^S^£^^LZ:i1 S&6X/iC^Z0 07/27/19S3 13:27 4734548 SUPERIOR STORAI3E PAGE ei( • Superior Storage LLC FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO:^ V? aJ^ (c» FROM: '7 DATE nlanll* CONFIDCNTIAIJTY NOTlCEi Pl«a« ad] if the mrsaa^c you received wii incoinplete or iUe<iWc. Thu facurrule may conilill information which 1$ IcpHy pfivilepd aod/or cuitujos confideiuia] company communicaimn. If the trader of thu facumdt ii aoc the iatcoded recipw*^ you are bertby oodfied that any disiemiiMiion, dinnhuiioa or copying of this commuoiettion is strictly prohibited If you bar* reedred this fiuc in error, plcajo icnowdiatcly notify tba person lifted above and ratum the original msoafe to the tender at cbe addneai liifad ahooe. Number of pages being transmitted, including this page: Original wiU be sent 1st Class mail. Original will be sent overnight. Yes if checked □ Yes if checked □ Tintructlona; C</^^ ^• P a-vvJL Cvfi^ f j oMiJvi) Anayn -t' Cnuui/. 'iXu^k If you have a problem with receipt ot this transmission, {Hcafc call us at (6)2) 449-5755. PLEASE DIRECT ANY FAX TRANSMISSION TO: (612) 473-4548. 601 Carlson Parkway • Suite 350 Minnetonka. Minnesota 55305 (612)449-5755 • Fax (612)473-4543 COUNCIL MbETir request FOR COUNCIL ACTION gUL 2 7 1998 •'c^rYC^0B0^!0 Department Approval: Administrator Approval: Name: Michael P. Gaffron Title: Senior Planning Coordinator Date: July 22,1998 Item No.: ^ Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2370 Gary O'Keefe, 1392 Baldur Park Road - Variances - Resolution Zoning District: LR-IC, Single Family Lakeshore Residential, 1/2 acre, sewered. Proposal: Requesting a hardcover variance, as well as a variance and conditioiiil use permit for grading within 5 ’ of a lot line and within the 0-75' lakeshore protected area to p)ermit construction of a new residence to replace the existing residence. List of Exhibits A - Resolution B - Notice of Planning Commission Action 7-21-98 C - Memo and Exhibits of July 15,1998 Lot Area: Lot Width: Lot Coverage: Setbacks: Hardcover: 0.71 acre (meets 1/2 acre requirement) 97.5' at shoreline, 113' at 75' setback (meets 80% of 100' standard) 10.9% (meets 15% limit) - meets 75' lake setback, 10' side setback, and 30' street setback requirements - will be located to meet north average lakeshore setback Final revised proposal as recommended by Planning Commission: 5,725 s.f. (This is 37.7% of the 75-250' zone, but is equal to 25% of the combined 75- 250' and south 0-75' zones) Summary of Request Applicant proposes to demolish the existing house of 1100 s.f. footprint and existing 600 s.f. detached garage, and replace with a new residence and attached garage totaling 3340 s.f. The lot is unique because, similar to other Baldur Park lots, it is affected by 0-75' zones at both ends. While the existing house and garage are each located less than 75' from their respective shorelines, the proposed residence and garage will be entirely in the 75-250' zone. The area of the 75-250' zone is 15,190 s.f., and the hardcover allotment allowed by code is 25% or 3,798 s.f. Planning Commission is recommending that due to the hardship of having two lakeshore protected zones with which to contend, applicant should be allowed to credit the area of the southerly #2370 - O'Keefe July 22,1998 Page 2 0-75' zone (i.e. the area between the street and the 75' setback line) toward his 75-250' zone for hardcover calculation purposes. The South 0-75'zone is 7,710 s.f. in area. Adding this to the 15,190 s.f. 75-250' zone yields 22,900 s.f., of which 25% equals 5,725 s.f. Applicant and his architect worked diligently and reduced their original proposals to meet the Planning Conunission’s recommendation. Applicant has also requested a 300 s.f. patio in addition to the 5,725 s.f. Planning Commission recommends denial of this patio, noting that the applicant has already been given a concession in order to have 5,725 s.f. It should be noted that pre-existing overall hardcover is 7,258 s.f. (this number excludes the portion of traveled road on the lot as well as all 0-75' rock/plastic landscape areas), hence there is a net attributable hardcover reduction of 1,533 s.f. The proposal includes site grading to fill in the foundation of the existing house and match existing grades as well as grading and fill to accomodate the new house and driveway. Since some of this grading is within the 0-75' zones and within 5' of the side lot lines, a CUP is also required. Early in the review process, grading to create a walkout was specifically denied by Planning Commission, and the revised plans incorporate daylight windows instead of a walkout, which eliminates lowering of grades within the 0-75' zone. This is consistent with past City practice in similar variance requests. Planning Commission Recommendation On July 20 Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the proposed plan as revised (Exhibit A-2 of July 15 staff memo) but without the extra 300 s.f. patio. The grading plan as proposed was recommended for approval, with the expectation that some retaining walls may be needed near the driveway apron and other 'tweaking' of grading plans may be needed. Grading in the 0-75' zone at the northwest comer was not indicated on the plan and therefore not specifically approved. The proposed "optional" pond was not required, and Planning Commission concluded it would not use the creation of such a pond to justify greater hardcover variances. Planning Commission also noted it would be appropriate to add language to the resolution indicating it is the City's intent that no additional hardcover should be approved for this property in the future. Staff Recommendation Staff concurs with the Planning Commission recommendation and recommends approval per the findings and conditions in the attached resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt or amend the attached resolution. f i A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO municipal zoning code SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 AND 2- SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8; AND * granting a conditional use permit PER SECTION 10.03 SUBDIVISION 19 - FILE ,.‘2370 located at 139^^^ o™" P«>Perty described as follows: {hereinafter "Citv"t 30/1.^11;City ”) and legally P^rand*’ ’’ “““““ Minnesota (hereinafter ”U.e Zoning Code 2- ‘‘lo 5^ 9°M- Subdivision 16(J) and 16rL^ to n^rmit fU • Subdivision 8; and 10.56, hardcover in the 75-250' zone in excess of the 2 W ^ residence constituting and to pemiit grading and land alterations ^^thif the 0^4^^ work is normally prohibited. lakeshore protected area where such NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2370, ^e property is 0.71 acres in area and is located in the LR 1C ^ino\^ v. -i Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. ^ ^ ^ ® 3. a. b. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 18, June 15 and July 20, 1998 and on a vote of 6-0 recommended approval of a hardcover variance to allow hardcover on the property in the amount of 5,725 s.f. per the revised plans, and approval of a CUP for grading within the 0-75' lakesliore protected zones, based upon the following findings: The property currently contains a residence structure, detached garage, driveways, etc., portions of which are located within the 0-75' lakeshore protected zones, and which constitute a total of 7,258 s.f. pre-existing hardcover in the 0-75' and 75-250' zones, not including 0-75' zone landscape beds incorporating fabric or plastic weed barrier. The lot is by definition 97.5' in width where 100' is normally required and therefore meets the "80% standard" for construction on an existing lot of record. The lot width is sufficient to allow construction of a single family residence which meets the required 75' lakeshore setback, required 10' side setbacks, and which will not encroach the average lakeshore setback. At 0.71 acres in area, the lot meets the 0.5 acre minimum lot area standard. The lot is unique in that it has 0-75' lakeshore protected zones on both its north and south ends due to its location on a narrow peninsula. Hardcover on the property under applicant's revised proposal will decrease from the pre-existing level of 7,258 s.f. to 5,725 s.f. where only 3,798 s.f. (25% of the 15,190 s.f. 75-250' zone) would normally be allowed. The proposed level of 5,725 s.f. is equivalent to 25% of the combined areas of the 75-250' zone and the southerly 0-75 zone. A variance to allow use of the area of the southerly 0-75' zone in calculating allowable hardcover is justified by the hardships imposed on the property by having lakeshore at both ends. Further, this level of hardcover is similar in magnitude to levels approved for other lots in the LR-IC zone. d. c. Page 2 of7 f.Adherence to the "25% of 75-250' zone" limitation would not allow for construction of the residence as proposed unless the residence was significantly reduced in size. The topography of the site including the unique elevated nature of the property in relation to its surroundings, and the location and orientation of adjacent homes, are factors which support the proposed house location, necessitating a minimum level of hardcover in excess of the normal allowance. g. The overall hardcover reduction on this property from 7,258 s.f. to 5,725 s.f. is a positive step in meeting the long term environmental goals of the City, as is the elimination of pre-existing buuctures from the north and south 0-75' zones. h. The proposed residence will be located to meet all of the required setbacks of the LR-IC District. i. A variance and CUP for grading within the 0-75' lakeshore protected zones is necessary to allow for removal of the existing structures and driveways and to accomodate new structures and driveways. Filling in the northerly 0-75’ zone is necessary so that applicant can fill in the excavation that will remain after the existing house is removed, with a blending in of the grade to match pre-existing contours. Grading of the northerly 0-75' zone to create a walkout situation as originally proposed by applicant would not be appropriate and would not be consistent with the City's goals and policies for lakeshore development. Grading and filling in the southerly 0-75' zone is necessary to provide a safe and functional driveway to serve the new residence. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance and CUP on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 3 of 7 5. 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit for the proposed grading in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zones as proposed will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property, nor will such use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2; 10.55, Subdivision 8; and 10.56, Subdivisions 16(J) and I6<L) to permit the construction of a new residence and amenities constituting hardcover on the property of 5,725 s.f per the approved site an hardcover plan attached to this resolution as Exhibit A, and fiirther grants a Conditioral Use Permit for land alterations within the 0-75' lakeshore protected zones and within 5' of a lot line per the approved grading plan and site plan attached to this resolution as Exhibit B, subject to the following conditions; No hardcover will be allowed in the northerly 0-75' zone. The only hardcover allowed in the 0-75' zone will be the portion of driveway as shown on the approved site plans. Hardcover in the southerly 0-75' and 75-250' zones shall not exceed the square footages per the site plan and hardcover worksheet attached to this resolution as Exhibit A, and shall not in any case exceed 5,725 s.f. in total. Page 4 of7 1. ▼ I 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. Applicant is advised that hardcover on the property based on this approval will exceed the normal limits, and any future proposal to increase hardcover on the property will likely not be approved. It is ^e intent of the City Council that the level of hardcover approved with this resolution not be exceeded in the future. Any significant changes to the approved house footprint, to the approved grading plan, or other changes which result in a plan that City staff deems to be potentially in conflict with the intent of this approval, shall be subject to further Council review. Site grading within the northerly 0-75' zone with the intent to create a walkout situation shall not be allowed. Erosion protection as may be required by the Building Inspector shall be maintained at all times. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (July 27, 1999). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 5 of7 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 27th day of July, 1998. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of ^ 1998 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared __________________________________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he(they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 6 of? J STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 1998 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrumoit, and acknowledged that he(they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ^ i SS. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of July, 1998, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono. a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 7 of7 CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE #2370 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: 7/21/98 TO: Gary O'Keefe COPIES TO:Mike Sharratt 4075 County Road 44 5590 Woodside Lane Minnetrista, MN 55364 Shorewood,MN 55331 TYPE OF APPUCATION:Variance Conditional Use Permit DATE OF MEETING: 7/20/98 VOTE:6 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval as submitted. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1 . 5,725 s.f. hardcover as proposed. Patio is not approved. » Grading plan as submitted - pond not required. Resolution to include stipulation re: no additional hardcover. 2. 3. 4. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council Monday, July 27, 1998, meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available fi’om the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. X:\APPS\WPWIN60VWPDOCS\CAROLE\PCACnON\2370 To: From: Date: Subject: Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Senior Planning Coordinator July 15,1998 #2370 Gary O'Keefe, 1392 Baldur Park Road - Variances - Continuation of Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IC, Single Family Lakeshore Residential, 1 /2-acre, Sewered Application:Request for hardcover variance, as well as a variance and conditional use permit for grading within 5' of a lot line and within the 0-75' lakeshore protected area to permit construction of a new residence to replace the existing residence. List of Exhibits A - 2nd Revised site plan, floor plan, elevation view B - 2nd Revised hardcover submittal C - Notice of Planning Commission Action 6-17-98 D - Memo and Exhibits of June 11,1998 Planning Commission June 15 Action On June 15 Planning Commission reviewed the revised proposal and on a vote of 6-0 tabled the request to allow applicant to further revise plans based on the following general direction: Limit hardcover to 25% of the combined 75-250' and South 0-75' zones, or approximately 5,731 s.f. (exact area of said zones to be confirmed by surveyor). Submit a revised grading plan for review. 2nd Revised Plan Submitted Applicants' architect has submitted a 2nd revised plan that incorporates the following elements: 1 . Proposed home and screen porch of footprint 2440 s.f 2. Attached 3-stall garage of footprint 900 s.f 3. Stoop, walks and driveways totaling 2,385 s.f 4. Total hardcover of 5,725 s.f. (=25.0% of 75 -250' and S. 0-75' areas) 5. Additional 300 s.f patio requested (would yield final hardcover of 6,025 s.f or 26.3%) 6. 1 -story home with daylight windows lower level; defined height approx. 23'. 7. No decks are proposed #2370 - O'Keefe July 15,1998 Page 2 8. 9. 10. 11. Driveway slope averages just under 8% which is steep but still very functional; grading plan for driveway suggests either a 15% sideslope from house to backup apron or the need for a 2'-4' retaining wall along street side of driveway and backup apron; other option is to do greater filling in south yard area... Minor grading proposed in N. 0-75' to blend contours from old foundation to new house Grading plan does not show revisions along N. 0-75' lot line as previously discussed Optional retention pond in S. 0-75' zone for potential mitigation of additional hardcover This plan exhibits a reduction in overall hardcover on the site from the pre-existing 7,258 s.f. (this number excludes area of Baldur Park Road in the property as well as existing 0-75' landscape beds underlaid by plastic) down to 5,725 s.f., or a net attributable reduction of 1,533 s.f. The proposal meets the letter and intent of the Planning Commission's direction at the June meeting. Remaining grading plan details can likely can be worked out. Staff conceptually supports the idea of a ponding area on the site to enhance stormwater runoff quality; although the City has generally not considered such alternative mitigation efforts as justification to grant hardcover variances, the idea has merit. Issues for Discussion 1. 2. 3. 4. Will Planning Commission recommend approval of the requested 300 s.f. patio? Does Planning Commission have any added comments to pass on to Council regarding the recommendation for granting hardcover credit for the South 0-75' zone? Is the lack of decks a concern? Will a future owner be asking for variances for decks? Does the Planning Commission have any comments regarding development of ponding as a mitigation for individual site hardcover? 5. Any additional concerns not previously addressed? Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the 2nd revised plan as proposed, subject to confirmation of details of the grading plan prior to Council action. Planning Commission should address the added 300 s.f patio request and any other items of concern. Advise applicant to establish house location carefully to avoid encroachment of the average setback line. #2370 - O'Keefe July 15,1998 Page 3 Options for Action 1. Recommend approval of variance to allow 5,725 s.f of hardcover as shown in 2nd revised plan, using credit for the S. 0-75 ’ zone area. Recommend approval for grading in 0-75' zones as needed to blend in with pre-existing contours, with no walkout excavation allowed. 2. Same as 1. but allowing additional 300 s.f. hardcover for patio. 3. Tabic for further information. 4. Recommend denial, stating reasons. 5. Other. (This item will be scheduled for Council review on July 27) • * • 9 L 4 P \ JLa_\ - I SHARRATTDESIGN COMPANY MEETING MEMO TELEPHONE MEMO Date: ________ ProMct: ^ Attending Initials Company Subject:1 Action Discussion By Information/Decision ^/g gc- /WAr^ , \ iPA\/A& Agfg^ I^JdAOS if J^a^ma ScyPU^^^_______^2^€t^a Jpg* ___ ________________________________________________________________jr •gg l4i^^ lex/STWr^ HAUhr/ii/etS. i£ l,i>(o*ZilC>i-i^‘^ZC^'7MZZ s;P. )L^ /^ci^PiAsrJCL ^>7-T*g^AJgS /> AJerr OyifAPj^Ae^ /^rn^c, //A^h<i£A/et^ Opr zr'^,2SS sf. 5590 Woodside Lane Shorewood. Minnesota 55331 470-9750 Fax 470-8407 E-matt: SDeslgnC Q AOL LEGAL DESCRPTION OF PREMISES: Lots 17 ond 18. Block 1, Bddur Pork this sirvsy Intonds to show the boundories of the obove deecribed property, o>'»d the locotion ot on exist..‘>g house, goroge, and all otiic’ visible "hordcover" thereon, it does not purport to show ony other improvements or encroochments. vfya — : o Denotes iron morker Bearings shown ore bosed upon on ossumed datum Datum: Meon seo level 0-75 FT. ZONE AREA: 16570+ > 75 FT. ZONE AREA: 15190+ X 7B)oi ieyx s.‘ f’ / z-4f ‘ : FPOM ! P„^!CMC TPD FAX . *SETUACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) Aya>nT// W V 75.25U’ Jul. 10 1993 12:03PH P2 V « •• ( y tKtt-/ I 250-500* 500-1000’ FAISTTNC Ha RDCQ \*T.R IN ZONE A. Mouic ____2.tf~. 5 ___ • ••«••»' • • •••#•>• ••• • • m • • .« •• •• •«••••• • ‘ Lcng^^ •• • ••• I B. Oarosc • X X X X /s. 6 y/5 S.F. W'lOCI a • • •••• « • •• •• C; Driveway . P. SidewaJk •. •—■• E. •pati«2gcpV/2lr:£ •% • * * * ft *T; Landscape Underlain By’Plasil’c Or Fabric. G. Olher X X X X X X X X X a LS La R • « •« • » •• > «• ••• *' * * ••• • « - • • • .« Ml*.- • • • • .........TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE . .. TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 6H ^ B N 100 - • I* PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE -A.- House-. • • ■ • • • • • • . . . .X Len|0\WiUUi • ••••«•.• *. • • • • • * B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. PftHo/Deek »« W « * • • •*Er-Landscape . Underlain • - • By Plasii's • Or Pabfic X X X X X X X • X X X C. Other ••• TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A . . • • •► B \ lOO - ?-3 S.F.----------^: S.F. 7-/r-'?ft S.F. /n 11 * S.F. S.F. S.F. S.V: S.F. • , s.r. S.F. S.F. ______:.?P- S.F. S.F. V S.F. ‘ ’ A 7S3 O '-S.F. B‘ ^,7 6 r. . . S.F. a« •* S.F. . S.F. S.F. F . • • • .. . . a S. Fi' *. . S.F. . S.F. .S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F........ S.F: . S.F. S.F. •• S.F. "* S.F. ~ % A B *.• «... CoHin ft Qronbtrg. Ino, 482 Tamarack ftvft ^ Lono LakOt MN 55358 r FROtl : Panasonic TAD-^FhX PHOIE MO. btlUAUv ZONE; (CmCLE ONE) Co-TlJ Jul. 10 1990 12:07PII P3 . *v .*** * * 7S-::-u'250-500'500*1000 T/V EXISTING Ha RDCQ\T;R IN ZONT. '• I / A. Houte• • ^ • • L<n;0i S.F. W'iiil, X X X S.P. “ S.F. S.F. B. Garose 2.V. /...........//s * I* S.F. i-'G/'-- Driveway /Ada /io/ia X X ss ci / ^70 S.F. /<P3o S.F.‘ D. Sidewalk 4i*Ac>f^ 2 V* f \ X __________ .• > B. Paiio/Dcck V aX X •aa* • a *w F. landscape Oridcrl'am By Plastic Or Fabric X X X X.. C. Other r/FJ- • • a • • TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZO.NE A- - 13 ■ #•«•••••• • waa^aa-^a a waa. • a PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A# House.............. _* *: X ,*':urv:r.\ • a • • • •*— •LenfUt • »«i • •« . • • • •• • • • X X X 9* O.i^pfie aX• • • •• . •• E.‘Paiio/beck # f • •• X • •••X X F. Landscape Underlain • By Plastic Or Fabric a# . «a a«a a I ••••*•* X X X C. Other .•mVJTtl ‘ ■ a •"*■ ' TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE total property area in zone , A........ .................• ' - 13 , aa* •*%.« \* a . • - -a*- X' -m • a a u ?e S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. » .g S.P., S.F. —- ■»« «# S.F. /3S S.F. 7.3/C^/oSO z: S.f, 5'7Ve^.xl00 «= A. P? fyn S.F.B Wijin • f . • « ;S-.F.‘ I*. a.. S.F. ■S:P: S.F. S.F. • Cl S.F. . S.F.t a. Mta . • aa . • • a IZI S.P. S.F. S.F. S.F. ■# . a • a a S.F. S.F. • S.F. 5.P. 100 “ « S-F. S.P. A b Coffin i OiMbMf, Ino; 482 Tamarack Avd. .....IMM 55356 • • PHOHE mo* '• ri ; i-arvc=«n.w ............ v-.vi.v.. ^ SE'J BACK 20.VK: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’ 9 9 • FROM : Panasonic TAD'EAX Jul. 10 1000 12:07PM P4 V A.. ^ i ^ Cy5.2Soj] 250-500’ 50C-1000' ' -^XlSTrNG-HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House • . _ 2 €. S_X . • • • •L«njih _______ V.*Ki;r: •*♦ •# ; • •• • «• • • •• . . Gftfsge..:. ., C. .Driveway . /V CA^At-ir O. Sidewalk r. o C^C. U^Ati. E.^^i^beck ........./^,K.ff(Si^Ln£L F. Landscape /‘r^jAAfC Underlain /AoiAff ■ By Plasiic ’ Or Fnbric X X X X X X X X X ^.^2----- vz la ••• •• 0. Olher »• . %» •• • • • • . .TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE total property area in zone A. , ■ Hil O. . B X 100 fROPO^jEn HAWnCOVF.R IN ZONE '“'’a. House ___________ ..........I..............L<n|«h WiOUl hi dorage X X X >•••••» - • Cr -Driveway ••.1 i* I •# D. Sidewalk X • .._E, .P*tlo/p.cck . • • • «, • -• ••• • 0» ••*»>«- •». • . • •••» • ” * F. Landscape UndcrTalK' By Plastic Of Fabric -ry: ovucr • • X X X X X »• o ........total hardcover in zone TOtAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE •r B X 100 • •^ • ft ••« ■••••• • • • * . • _ S.F. _ S.F. _ S.F. ‘ ' - S.F. t % i • Y7(P S.F. 2JA*0 S.F. 2 be? S.F. ./^O S.F.- AK S.F. ' 2/. . 9Z S.F. . ■ ..■?£— S.F. ?5 ZCJL S.F. S.F. S.F. iV¥2 0 S.F. /S/9 0 S.F.zr//o -% A B ■ct; • .. . • H .«•>• • S.F. »• * S.F.- . S.F. S.F. •• S.F.••• • *#•••• • S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. • ^ S.F. S.F< . ■S.F. s.p; •S.F. _ S.P. % A B CetfliiaOiokibtr«.lii0. 482 Tamarack AV0,..... * LOflflLake.MN 55356" c CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE #2370 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE; June 17, 1998 TO: Gary O'Keefe 4075 Co. Rd. 44 Minnetrista MN 55364 COPIES: TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance DATE OF MEETING: 06/15/98 VOTE: 6 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Tabled for reasons noted below. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS; Tabled to allow applicant to revise plans to be more in conformity with the hardcover limitations. There appeared to be a general consensus that 40% in the 75-250' zone is too much- a figure that received apparent support was to allow 25% hardcover withm the combmed 75-250' and 0-75' south zones, i.e. 25% of (15,200 + 7.725) or approximately 5,731 s.f. (your surveyor, should confirm the actual areas within each zone). A revised grading plan should be submitted with your revised site plan/house plans. . Applicant ’s next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the July 20 meeting is Friday, July 10. Applicant ’s next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Planning Commission Monday, July 20, 1998; meeting starts at 6:30 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. jig 1 Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Senior Planning Coordinator June 11,1998 Subject: #2370 Gary O'Keefe, 1392 Baldur Park Road - Variances - Continuation of Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-1C, Single Family Lakeshore Residential, 1 /2-acre, Sewered Application:Request for hardcover \'oriance, as well as a variance and conditional use permit for grading within 5' of a lot line and within the 0-75’ lakeshore protected area to permit construction of a new residence to replace the existing residence. List of Exhibits A - Revised site plan, floor plan, elevation view B - Revised hardcover submittal C - Notice of Planning Commission Action 5-19-98 D - Memo and exhibits of May 14,1998 Planning Commission May 18 Action This item was tabled on May 18 to allow applicant to provide revised plans addressing Planning Commission's concerns. Those concerns include: 75-250' Hardcover should be limited to 40% (6,080 s() Excavation to create a walkout will not be approved - Cutting down the top of the hill received a mixed reaction (3 in favor, 2 against) Revised Proposal Applicant has provided a revised site plan for a 1-story residence with a lower level that the plan labels as "Walkout Floor", but appears to include daylight windows rather than walkout doors. The house concept has been completely flipped, with the garage now facing to the right rather than the left. The driveway similarly is flipped and would enter Baldur Park road further to the northwest. No second story is evident from the plans submitted. The bulk of the house from the street side appears visually somewhat lower than the first plan, although no elevation view from the lake side has been provided. #2370 - O'Keefe June 11, 1998 Page 2 A revised grading plan has not been submitted, although applicant notes that while the walkout excavation has been abandoned, he would like to do some shaving in the 0-75 ’ zone along the northwest side to match the neighboring elevations. Staff is concerned how this will impact a remaining 20" maple in this area. Hardcover The revised hardcover proposal includes some changes to the driveway and patio concepts. A backup or parking area near the garage is proposed, as well as a "percolating paver" patio at the northwest comer of the house, just off of the kitchen and screen porch. While no detail information has been submitted about the specific paver material proposed, in all past applications the City has considered such materials as hardcover, regardless of their permeability, much the same as weed-control fabrics in landscape beds. Including the patio and reconfigured driveway, proposed hardcover in the 75-250 ’ zone is 6,505 s.f. or 42.8%, as compared with 41.4% in the first proposal and 26.2% existing. Also, ^ ^ the revised proposal has significantly more driveway in the south 0-75 ’ zone than the first plan, ^ ^ ‘ approximately 1100 s.f. as compared to just 600 s.f. See the following comparison table: n Fxisting 1 St Proposal Revised Proposal Allowed 0-75 ’ N. 496 sf (6.3%) 0 sf (0%) 0 sf (0%) 0 sf (0%) 75-250 ’ 3985 sf (26.2%) 6288 sf (41.4%) 6,505 sf (42.8%) 3800 sf (25%) 0-75 ’S. 2284 sf (29.6%) 605 sf (7.8%) 1.100 sf (14.2%) __fLsL(0%) 6765 sf 6893 sf 7,605 sf 3800 sf f A variance to allow 40% hardcover in the 75-250 ’ zone for a complete rebuild is not necessarily in keeping with the City’s normal practice of holding new construction to a higher hardcover standard than when an existing home is added onto. The primary factor that supports some degree of hardcover variance is that the 75-250 ’ zone is reduced in size by having lake on both ends of the lot. While there is nothing ’magic’ about the existing overall site hardcover number (6,765 s.f.), it would appear somewhat inconsistent to allow an increase in hardcover for a total site redevelopment when the total site is already significantly over the hardcover limits. Planning Commission’s suggested reduction of the 75-250 ’ zone to 40% could have resulted in a plan that was less than 6,765 s.f. overall if the driveway had not increased and the patio was not proposed. If there is a need to have added driveway with the current plan, that need should be documented so that Planning Commission can determine whether it constitues a hardship or is merely a factor in the total site hardcover balance. Planning Commission must weigh all these factors in reaching a recommendation. #2370 - O’Keefe June 11,1998 Page 3 Lot Coverage Proposed Lot Coverage bv Structures: 1st Proposal: 3664/30,800=11.9% (Meets 15% limit) Revised Proposal: 3638 sf / 30,800 =11.8% (Meets 15% limit) Grading The initially proposed grading plan included lowering the crown of hill by 2-3', including grading within 5’ of side lot lines and within 0-75' zone, requiring a variance and CUP. The plan set submitted does not include a revised grading plan, making it impossible to determine the extent of proposed grading under the revised plan. Filling for the proposed driveway may be significant in the area north of the existing garage. No revised detail is provided for the applicant's intended grade matching along the northwest lot line in the north 0-75' zone. A revised grading plan is necessary for this application to be adequately reviewed. Because of the potential loss of mature trees in the 0-75' zone, staff has difficulty recommending approval for lowering the hill if that is still intended, although we are advised that one of the two noted 0-75' mature trees in that area (the 20" basswood) has now been removed. It is unclear to staff whether this was related to storm damage. Conceptually, plan revisions that help limit the potentially imposing impact of this residence on the neighborhood are a positive step, but doing so by changing the natural character of the 0-75' zone would not necessarily be appropriate in staffs opinion. A proposal to match the 0-75* grade with the adjacent property may be appropriate but a grading plan is needed to show the extent of work intended. Planning Commission should have this information in hand prior to making a recommendation. Summary of Requests The revised plan still requires three separate approvals: 1. Hardcover variances 2. CUP and variance for excavation of portions of the hill within 5' of lot line and within 75’ of lake 3. CUP and variance for land alteration in 0-75' zones to fill in existing foundation and reconfigure driveway Review of Hardships Please review the staff memo of May 14 in regards to the hardship criteria. #2370 - O’Keefe June 11,1998 Page 4 Issues for Considei ation 1. Have adequate hardships been demonstrated to support the proposed hardcover variances, which under the revised proposal appear to have increased in overall magnitude rather than decreased? Does the movement of hardcover out of the 0-75' zones into the 75-250' zone, provide adequate justification for an overall site hardcover increase of more than 800 s.f. over the current approximately 6,765 s.f. ? 2. Will Planning Commission recommend approval for grading within 5' of the lot boundaries and within the 0-75' zone to lower the hill 2-3' if that is still proposed? A revised grading plan is needed to confirm that no new runoff flows are directed toward the neighboring properties; to confirm the extent of actual grading proposed in the 0-75' zones; and to confirm whether any importation or exportation of fill is needed. Staff Recommendation 1. A revised grading plan is needed in order to confirm the extent of grading required to accomplish the revised site plan. This should be provided for review prior to Planning Commission action. 2. 4. Staff recommends approval of some hardcover variance for the southerly 0-75' zone to accomodate a driveway, but questions the extent of driveway necessary. Staff recommends that the overall site hardcover be limited to the existing 6765 s.f., allowing applicant to decide where to reduce hardcover. If Planning Commission recomnn^ivds approval for some degree of grade changes in the 0-75' zones, approval should be subject to staff review of the grading and drainage plan to ensure no impacts to neighboring propertu . subject to a confirmation that cuts and fills are balanced to limit the importationy'exportation of fill, and subject to erosion controls. Staff recommends denial of any grading to create a walkout in the northerly 0-75' zone. Grading should be allowed, however, in the north 0-75' zone to fill in the basement of the existing residence and grade it to match existing contours; and grading should be allowed to accommodate the driveway in the south 0-75 zone. Options for Action Recommend approval. Recommend partial approval or conditional approval. Recommend denial. Table for additional information or revisions. Other. I 1 < t I F f Uf mI .1 I i 4r k > r X <4 ■t—’« B SHARRA TT DESIGN COMPANY MEETING MEMO TELEPH0r2 ’\ r ' Attending Initials Company Project: ^ jg-feE.y'IS, Subject: Discussion Bv Information/Decision Action rr ^^gjPgoOejt- 1=031- <SP- ppor d^AA£L£&i y«=o1~_WMhH- 1,00 0 1=toi- <g.o& tcmt ^ _Pea^x^j^tU^ PAMfett, ¥»Wft SP- 5590 Woodside Lane Shorewood. Mnnesota 55331 4-fo 6,gQtr 7T-^Jr 470-9750 Fax 470-8407 E-mail; SDesignC Q AOZ. r c CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 TO: Gary W. O'Keefe 4075 Co. Rd. 44 Minnetrista MN 55364 ZONING FILE mm • NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: May 19, 1998 COPIES: TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance/Conditional Use Permit DATE OF MEETING: 05/18/98 VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commbsion recommends the following: Tabled for reasons noted below. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Tabled to allow applicant to address issues noted by Planning Commission and provide revised plans. General direction provided by Planning Commission includes: 1.Limit hardcover in the 75-250' zone to 40% (surveyor established 75-250' zone at 15,200 s.f.±; 40% =6,080 s.f.) 2. Consensus (5 of 5) is that excavation in 0-75' zone for a walkout will not be approved. 3.No consensus was reached on whether cutting down the top of the hill should be allowed (3 in favor of it, 2 against). Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information including revised plans. Deadline for the June 15, 1998 meeting is June 5, 1998. If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (473-7357). If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. State Law provides that Cities shall make decisions on zoning requests within 60 days from the date of application, and that this review period may be extended by notification to the applicant. Your application was received on April 22 and the 60-day review period would end on June 22. However, because your application was tabled by the Planning Commission to the June 15 meeting, the earliest potential date of final Council action falls after the 60-day period ends. Therefore, the 60-day review period is hereby extended an additional 60 days to August 22, 1998. r !• • » To:Ch^ Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Date: Michael P. Gaffiron, Senior Planning Coordinator May 14,1998 Subject:#2370 Robert Kuhn/Gary O'Keefe, 1392 Baldur Park Road - Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: Application: LR-IC, Single Family Lakeshore Residential, 1/2-acre, Sewered Request for hardcover variance, as well as a variance and conditional use permit for grading within 5' of a lot line and within the 0-75' lakeshore protected area to permit construction of a new residence with walkout level. Note: The O'Keefe's purchase of this property is contingent on variance approval. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Survey (Existing) E - Proposed Site Plan F - Proposed Grading Plan G - Dr^ House Elevation Views H - Hardcover Calculations I - Neighborhood Topography / Residential Footprints Comparison J - Variance Resolution #2831 adopted July 9,1990 K - Documentation from Prior Approvals L - Comprehensive Plan Review and Excerpts Pertinent Facts Lot area excl. traveled road = 30,800 sf = 0.71 ac (Exceeds 0.50 ac min. requirement) Lot width = 97.5' at shoreline, 113' at 75' setback (Exceeds 80% of 100' min. requirement) irements:Required Proposed Lake setback 75'84' Street setback 30'80' W. side setback 10'29' E. side setback 10'13' Average setback No encr.No encr. AMiii #2370 - O’Keefe May 14,1998 Page 2 Hardcover; 0-75' N. 75-250' 0-75’ S. Existing 496 sf (6.3%) 3985 sf (26.2%) J22fil5f(29.6%) 6765 sf Proposed Allowed 0sf(0%) 0sf(0%) 6288 sf (41.4%) 3800 sf (25%) 605 sf (7.8%) _JLsL(0%) 6893 sf 3800 sf Variance 2488 sf (16.4%) 605 sf (7.8%> 3093 sf Proposed Lot Coverage by Structures = 3664 / 30,800 =11.9% (Meets 15% limit) Proposed grading; 1. 2. 3. Intent is to lower crown of hill by 2-3', including grading within 5' of side lot lines and within 0-75' zone, requiring a variance and CUP. Intent is to excavate within the 0-75' lakeshore protected zone to create a walkout situation, requiring a variance and CUP. Fill ranging from 1' to 5' will occur in the 75-250' and southerly 0-75' zones to create a larger flat area for house and driveway. Background The existing house was built in 1910 according to tax records. The detached garage was built in 1973. A variance was granted in 1975 for an addition to the house and basement replacement. In 1989 a variance was granted for 4,940 sf hardcover in the 75-250' zone and 1,893 sf in the south 0- 75’ zone (totalling 6833 sf) for replacement with a new residence. A CUP for grading in the 0-75' zones was also granted to allow for filling in the old house excavation and reworking the driveway. That application included a request to excavate for a walkout, which was denied. The variance approval was renewed in 1990 but was never used, so the current status of the site is as it was prior to the 1989 review. The applicant has provided a site plan showing removal of the existing detached garage near the road, reconstruction/relocation of the driveway, and replacement of the existing 1100 sf footprint house and 584 sf garage with a new residence and attached garage with a footprint totaling 36^ sf. The lot coverage by structures vrill still be conforming at just under 12%. Hardcover on the site is reduced in the 0-75' zones and increased in the 75-250' zone. There < f *?t increase of about 128 sf over the entire lot by staffs calculation (414 sf per applicants calcu 'itionv The proposed hardcover over the entire lot is essentially the same level as was approved in 1989-90. The net effect is to shift a greater portion of the hardcover to locations further from the lake. The house site is atop a hill on the otherwise very low and flat Baldur Park peninsula. Applicant notes that lowering the hill slightly will result in the new residence being somewhat less imposing in its surroundings. Both adjacent homes are lower in the topography than applicants site. Note t*’^t #2370 - O’Keefe May 14,1998 Page 3 this is one of the few double lots on the peninsula. However, a portion of that lowering will occur in the northerly 0-75' zone. It appears that 2 mature trees in the 0-75' zone would be removed as a result of this lowering. Applicant also proposes to grade for a walkout. This will require excavation of as much as 6' deep in the 0-75' protected zone where such excavations are not normally allowed, and would likely rsult in a 3rd mature tree being lost. The City has denied a number of such requests in the past, citing Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies that intend to prevent changes to the shoreline landscape (see Exhibit L). In summary, the application essentially requests three separate approval: 1. Hardcover variances 2. CUP and variance for grading to lower the hill within 5' of lot line and within 75' of lake 3. CUP and variance for excavation within 0-75' zones to create a walkout, as well as to fill in existing foundation and reconfigure driveway Review of Hardships The applicant submitted a CUP application form rather than a variance form, hence no formal hardship statement was presented. Applicant did note the prior hardcover variance approval, and Planning Commission may wish to review the findings from the 1989-90 approvals (see Exhibit 1). Applicant will be prepared to address the specific justifications for the granting of each of the requested approvals at the May 18 meeting. Criteria for Determining Undue Hardship The following criteria must be considered in determining whether adequate hardship exists to grant variances: 1.The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The property contains an existing residence. That residence could potentially be expanded without variances with some revisions to the site plan; however, access to the property is necessarily within the southerly 0-75’ zone, so some variance would likely be needed to revise the driveway even if a house was built meeting hardcover requirements. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. #2370 - Gary O’Keefe May 14, 1998 Page 4 h The magnitude ofthe hardcover variances is related to the size and location of the proposed house, factors under control of the applicant. A smaller house and garage could result in a reduction in the magnitude of the hardcover variance in the 75-250'zone. The southerly 0-75' hardcover variance as proposed is the minimum necessary tc accomodate the driveway, and this is a factor unique to the property. The variances to do grading work in the 0-75' zone are related specifically to the use to which the applicant wishes to put the property, and are not inherent problems with the lot's buildability or uniqueness in staff's opinion. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Applicant's lot is larger than most other lots in the neighborhood. It also is the highest lot in the neighborhood. The hardcover variance will allow the construction of a residence and attached garage completely within the 75-250'zone. The character of this neighborhood has been changing over the last 15 years as the small summer cabins have been enlarged into newer larger homes, typically on 50' lots. None of this upgrade has occurred by combining two properties, so the applicant's existing double lot is somewhat unique. The proposed house/garage combination will not be substantially greater in footprint area than other homes/garages in the neighborhood. The proposed 3-level view from the lake side, coupled with the greater width of the house than those on neighboring narrower lots, will potentially make this house dominant in the neighborhood. Applicant is attempting to soften this somewhat by lowering the height of the hill so the house can be slightly lower, but at the expense of some mature trees and a slight change in the topography of the shoreline. 4. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of this chapter. 5. Economic factors have not been suggested as a consideration with this application. The Board of Appeals ana Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this Chapter for the property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Single family residences and attached garages are allowed uses in the LR-IC district. #2370 - O'Keefe May 14,1998 Page 5 6. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The same hardcover requirements and grading/excavating limitations apply to all residential lakeshore lots in the LR-IC district. 7. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. The conditions applying to this lot are the same as those applying to other lots in the LR-IC district. 8. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The applicant has a right to maintain the existing residence, or to construct a new residence on the property that meets City code standards. A new home could be constructed on the property without most of the variances being requested. 9. The granting of the proposed variances will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Granting of the variances will not impair health, safety, comfort or morals. 10. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. Certain facets of the hardcover variance request are related to the applicants wish for certain size house and garage; the southerly 0-75' hardcover variance is related to the factors inherent in the lot due to the lake being on both ends of the lot. The request for grading in the 0-75'zone is for the convenience of the applicant; the request for a CUP to lower the crown of the hill, while benefitting the applicant to some extent, may also lessen the impact ofthis home in the context of the neighborhood, but results in the loss of mature trees and changes the natural topography of the shoreline. Issues for Consideration 1. Have adequate hardships been demonstrated to support the proposed hardcover variances? Is the fact that the proposed hardcover variances are similar to those granted in 1989-90, but now with a greater share of the hardcover removed from the 0-75' zone, a positive factor #2370 - O'Keefe May 14,1998 Page 6 2. 3. in granting the magnitude of variances requested? Is there a basis to suggest that the hardcover overall should not be increased above the current square footage on the site (approximately 6,765 sf)? filline from 2' to 5' deep on the road side of the house to make a larger level building pad, the total amount of earth movement would appear to be in the 500-1000 cubic yard i^ge, a portion of which is required to protect the house foundation. It is a clore eall as «> a CUP is needed merely based on excavatmg in excess of 500 cy; a key factor should Ire the potential impacts on drainage. The plan appears to not direct new flows toward the neighboring properUes. It would also be helpful to know whether the grading plan requires any importation or exportation of fill, or if it's balanced between cuts and fills. Any approval should require the standard erosion control requirements. Is there sufficient justification to allow excavation in the 0-75 ’ zone to create a w^out? Please review the minutes from the prior variance approval, and the mcluded Comprehensive Plan review and excerpts. Staff Recommendation 1. 2. Staff recommends approval of a hardcover variance for the southerly 0-75' zone to accomodate a driveway. The variance to allow 40% hardcover in the 75-250 zone for a complete rebuild is not necessarily in keeping with the City’s normal practice of holding mw construction to a higher hardcover standard than when an existing home is added onto, ^e primary factor that supports some degree of hardcover vanance is that the 75-250 Lne is reduced in size by having lake on both ends of the lot. TheJact that so muc hardcover will be required to accomodate a side loading garage suggests be reduced by having an end-load garage, but due to topography it would have to be at a lower level to end up with a reasonably sloped driveway. Planning Comnussion must weigh all these factors in reaching a recommendation. Because of the loss of mature trees in the 0-75' zone, staff has difficufty r«ommending approval for lowering the hill. Conceptually, this proposal to help limit me potenttal y imposing impact of this residence on the neighborhood is a positive step, but to chMge the natural look of the 0-75' zone to accomplish that, is the problem. If Planning ComLssion recommends approval, it should be subject to City approval of the “d drainage plan to ensure no impacts to neighboring properties, subject to a that cuts and fills are balanced to limit the importation/exportation of fill, and subject t erosion controls. #2370 - 0"Keefe May 14,1998 Page 7 3.Based on City’s history of denial of 0-75' excavation to create walkouts, and based on the goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan, and based on the potential loss of an additional tree, staff recommends denial of the grading to create a walkout in the northerly 0-75' zone. Grading should be allowtdL however, in the north 0-75' zone to fill in the basement of the existing residence and it U? match existing contours. Options for Action 1. 2. 3. 4. Recommend approval. Recommend partial approval or conditional approval. Recommend denial. Other. Application # Date Received 77^-^.^ ^ Amount Paid CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION V % 8 q^i.ou^ Ph^K Po/^p ^ mm m A > a • «m CL Type of Application to be Filed C LAP Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) _ Qp- IH" ^—3J—OOQ^# I 9 -i APPLICANT _Phone (hornet T<^ " / Phone (work) OWNER (if different than applicant) Name f Phone (home). Phone (work)_ Address ____City Date Property Acquired ________________________ I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Zip sr£~a<>l __(month/year) LRI-GFEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - $ 75.00 For each variance request with CUP application $175.00 Residential Accessory Use _ $250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) ” ~ $225.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments _____$200.00 Duplex Credit/PH{i $300.00 Commercial/Ind.'-sliial Use r t U P£2Aft<t2tV $2i0.00 Land Alteratin.; CVITHIH OT /\ PBOfWZIV Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain ____ Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule $150.00 Renewal Fee (no change fi-om original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICAT^6NS $250.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) 33ZZ S300.00 Vacation _____$200.00 Easement Vacation $100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision ^ $350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $350.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 3 3 _ $ 100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule % REQOTIED SUBMITTALS 1. X Completed Application Form. 2. 3. Describe request in detail. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. X Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County DeparUnent of Fim ice, A-603, Government Center, 3480271^ X Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey information. ___ Attach legal de5''«^‘ption to application if not included on required survey. X Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). ___ List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). ___Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). ___As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of euiy other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR COPY FOR REPRODUCTION (11” X 17” OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff:__________________________Date_______________________ i •• • • 7*>APPLICANT'S SIGNATUI^ ' The applicant hereby agrees 'to provide alf -iitformation required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant ’s signature Date ^ OWmR’S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council .members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner’s signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. r APR-23-1993 11:24 PAOn lACMQXK 01 EEFE MECH h IIIC h L.INC. TO I 6X2 621 BXSe P.03-^ 03612 941 1391 1990>D4-23 iei39RM Na26 *.62 4. K)CQmKl^P SUBMITTA.1.8 I ^ X Coinpletcrt Appllcillon Fpith. 2. t^d^itbe rs^ucll Ia dcloit- CertlAeU PiPpcrly Own«« Lisl of ownen wilhln 350 ’, UVelf »*•»? (y®” " mujl obtain this list, labels tuJ m®p from Ilcnncpln County Depiitmant of Plimnee. A-603, Oovemment Center, 348-327)1 Certificate of Survey (si^jneO by A licensed surveyor) - tclbr fo handout for lurvcy informaiion. , , 5. Attach lcp.81 description to RppUoation if not ineiudcd ©n required so»vcy. 0, " To)'OEraphic survey (cxiiltnE and proposed conlouTc) U lwi<i ©Iterations in o List of the legfll name* (intUtde marital slatoa) of all poiaons with an Intcresi in the property. Ihls would Include nome(s) of BppUrant(a) if not current ownerf). Conatrxwtion plan, if flpplicoblc (see staff for leqviremcnls). As an addtnduiu to this application, ploose attach a sc]>araie list of any o i ' pereena you w»h notified ef Ihl# eppUcallou. • • • YOU ARE lUiQUIUKD TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OE FOR RKTRO0UCTION (U" X J7“ OJl SMAIXKR) FOR AI.I. DOLUM.^S 8UJlMIVri*Ih (Slftir will rvqolii' to scale dcawmES of all doeumantii p«ans. etc. o c submittvd.) Tlu; ApplIcMil and Pfopsuy Owner nnisv sign this application. Please remember that your ftppUcatlen is not complolo if the above InfbrmntJou has not been Included. Ccrtlflvatlipfi by Clcfical Dcpartmaitt thai Land Use Application is complete. InhialS of Clerical Stelf:,.. ___________________--------------------------------------- 7. 8. 9. (N c infcmtaiion *iq>pUad Is tix^Wid couaei to the best of Jus/hcr kflowladg©.A is tiuafwid coitaei to the best of tlale ^ The owner hereby acknowlcdiies mk9 egree. 1» tWe eppliceiion end furtici icnsonablc entry onto the property by City a\«lf. eonsultanta, agents, commission rnembtiS, pod Council rnenibors iw pimpwes of Invefiigatlon ^ veriOcatioii of this request. Owner’. £-^- all whcUiilcd fpvlflw mrcJinpj ©f the I’lnnnlnjt Cvnimlwton and Oountll. U en oppUc«n. tl>e JenSed n,ctc;n». «TRn^^.n>W to hftva an nuO,orU«d attend li» yogi ptnee .nd ►Ovise OhC BuUd»©r Bunina Oii'iec of !lib clinngf prior to the mcetlni. TnTQI P.MS TOTAL P.03 RUN DATE OA/25/98 r-; BATCH 503 PROP ADOR ONNER NAHE TA>J»AYER NAHE/AOOR 38 08-117-23 31 0001 OlAOO BALDUR PARK RO CHARLES B REID CHARLES B REID 1400 BALDUR PARK RD NAYZATA MN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST 38 08-117-23 31 0002 01396 BALDUR PARK RD R J I M A NETT TRUSTEES RICHARD I MARGE NETT 1396 BALDUR PARK RD NAYZATA MN 55391 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 6 38 08-117-23 31 0003 01392 BALDUR PARK RD R C A J E KUHN ROBERT C A JUDY E KUHN 1392 BALDUR PARK RD NAYZATA MN 55391 PROP AODR / ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAffi/ADDR I I PROP ADOR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR , *. 38 08-117-23 31 0004 01384 BALDUR PARK RD M D A J A VERSTEE6 MARK D VERSTEEG 1384 BALDUR PARK RD NAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 31 0007 00038 ADDRESS UNA5SIGNE0 NILLIAM J M FRANKLIN NILLIAH J M FRANKLIN BROADNAY SALES 1000 N BROADNAY MPLS MN 55411 38 08-117-23 31 0010 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED NILLIAM J M FRANKLIN NILLIAH J M FRANKLIN BROADNAY SALES 1000 N BROADNAY MPLS MN 55411 38 08-117-23 34 0016 01412 BALDUR PARK RD C C HAGFORS A K E HAGFORS CURTIS C HAGFORS 1412 BALDUR PARK RD NAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 34 0028 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED RECTNALD A SPINOLER R IT SPINDLER SPRING FARM 8402 BURROUGHS RD N DEER PARK NA 99006 38 08-117-23 31 0005 01376 BALDUR PARK RD J NANG SOL BOTHNELL-NANG J NANG SDL fU)TW4ELL-NANG 1376 BALDUR PARK RD NAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 31 0008 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED NILLIAM J M FRANKLIN NILLIAM J M FRANKLIN BROADNAY SALES 1000 N BROADWAY MPLS MN 55411 38 08-117-23 34 0014 01420 BALDUR PARK RD C M JOHNSON A K M F JOHNSON C M JOHNSON A K M F JOHNSON 1420 BALDUR PARK RD NAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 34 0017 01406 BALDUR PARK RD JAMES P WERNER JAMES P WERNER 1408 BALDUR PARK RD NAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 34 0029 00038 ADDRESS IfJASSIGNED REGINALD A SPINDLER R A SPINOLER SPRING FARM 8402 BURROUGHS RO W DEER PARK HA 99006 38 08-117-23 31 0006 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED NILLIAM J M FRANKLIN WILLIAM J M FRANKLIN BROADWAY SALES 1000 N BROADWAY MPLS MN 55411 38 08-117-23 31 0009 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED NILLIAM J H FRANKLIN WILLIAM J M FRANKLIN BROADWAY SALES 1000 W BROADWAY MPLS MN 55411 38 08-117-23 34 0015 01416 BALDUR PARK RD J C ULKU ET AL H/L EST RUBY E A JOHN C ULKU 1416 BALDUR PARK RD NAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 34 0018 01404 BALDUR PARK RD CHARLES AFFIAS CHARLES AFFIAS 2634 JERSEY AVE S ST LOUIS PARK MN 55426 o8 08-117-23 34 0030 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED REGINALD A SPINOLER R A SPINOLER SPRING FARM 8402 BURROUGtIS RO N DEER PARK NA 99006 C ' Jl 0 RUN DATE 04/2S/9858 08-117-23 SA 003100038 ADDRESS UNASSIGi'lED REGINALD A SPINDLER R A SPINDLER SPRING FARH 8402 BURROUGHS RD H DEER PARK HA 99006 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST38 08-117-23 34 003200038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED REGINALD A SPINDLER R A SPINDLER SPRING FARM 8402 BURROUGHS RD H DEER PARK NA 9900638 08-117-23 34 0059 01428 BALDUR PARK RD THE HELI ROTH TRUST GUENTHER A HELI ROTH /TRSTES 1428 BALDUR PARK RD HAYZATA MN 55391 REPORT NO. P1435401 PAGE 738 08-117-23 34 003300038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HAROLD R KITCHEN HAROLD KITCHEN BOX 418NISSHA MN 56468 TOTAL BATCH 503 00023 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. • t Ur LU I o 1/ /AINU lO, DUUUrx i, uryi^uKjw rHENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LEGAL DESCRPTION OF PREMISES: Lots 17 ond 18. Block 1. Boldur Pork This suTvsy intsnds to show ths boundoriss of ths obovs dsscribod propsrty, orid the location of on existing house, goroge, ond oil other visible "hardcover" thereon. It does not purport to show any other Improvemente'or encroachments. o Denotes Iron marker Bearings shown are based upon on assumed datum Cotuiii: Meuii seu levc' 0-75 FT. ZONE AREA: 16570+- S. F, > 75 FT. ZONE AREA: 15190+- S. F. V V • ••, «■ ' S. * ♦ MTS /'-V6'± COFFIN k GRONBERG, INC. CONSULTWG ENONEERS, LAND SURVEYORS. SITE PLANNERS 462 TAMARACK AVENUE. LONG LAKE. MN. 55356 612-473-4141 I HEREBY CERTfY THAT THS FLAK SPECflCATlCH OB BEPOBT WAS PREPARED BY OR IMER IIY OfCCT SUPCRV6CN AM) THAT I Ay A OaY UCDSCD PR0TES90NAL CNQMECR UMXR the laws of i>€ state Of MBKSOTA. OATt IM UCOOC MMHS 7 r/ r joe Na 98166 ‘ ■? •1; • « V f * « ; ■'V y. •••. ; • •» > — ■ojrrr” 4/27/98 jot Na 98166 ^•^****'^.^ •----------- S \ *' ’H'v^— ! • L—=r^:i==: r I • \ I V I y---' I '^•i. I— ' --------.------- ' x\ '‘x --------—* \\ \ ''O', \ V-"V-------- i'N I —■» ____" I ------------ } I --^j ! '-J N i '"HiI-—--- I I \ / --f—T /"--"H ■ '''' ------------------------------------------ / ! !' - /'J4 I_--"" ______________________________" / / • • : ’.*•■ ' r;' ‘ •** /; * V » / .' 'ki ------------------------------—.,.— '"---T-f;! ^ " •>.kv i '*:=.••••••;< . •. .1 •.»• Vj‘ ;-l \ K '■■■■■k::; ^■■■■■\ «!•_ —- / ' I JW..- r--' "k..... 7'-":.^'" '-------------- lOOiOO ^>*4-Nei»HAt»VkWL»«tj»--------------------------------- LAKE MINNETONKA "/ ^ ___/----f -/ ________ I ^ / • .< •• >. / W=^ Jl I ».• •• ’ \ . . ». • - -1 - ' . /. *.r' i V* •;' 'v\'. .?• ‘ V*' / . : • V 4;; .'■•*. .'. ^ \ w ■ . i "\/ /" ''V / ____:':n---j._______1'^—0 Cv .................................... »«»<, .................................................. "'■...............................................''..^ " w4* NOHMA4. rVTO u»C -lllll------------------------------------------'4^ ^---------------------------------------- ^ • • • . * ^ ; :;. •• ’ ••:r r .r . >. • . • <• T - • I ' • •* *'• .* »• *^ ^ ** *. - V-•» ..• ^ I V* •* ‘ *•'. t-- ■ • V-v: ■ ^ • • .• ♦'•*** . **U‘f *.. '•^ **7s • ^^: . ■. •. / , ^ •k ■•*- •• * ••• • *. • .*. ■ *u» • *. • ... • t , / • • .—7 6 > V 1^ imcim miWTiTiTi \______ \¥9S^ HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75* EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House ___________ X /f-2- 75-250 ’250-500*500-1000' \ ^ S.F. Length VViciih B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Other X X X X X X X X X X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. S4 S.F. S.F.2^o\ l<&o TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE__ ^01-1 B X 100 is.ngi*is.s S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. = S.F. S.F. A S.F. B % PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House_____________ X S.F. Length Width D. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Dcck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Other X X X X X X X X X X X X JL3S S.F. i 1 ■j <2/ S.F. S.F 13^ - .F. '*4S.F . S.F. S.F. S.F. ’ S.F. S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZON^^^___ 4n___ + B X 100 ^ S.F. A \ S.F. B r LOT AREA, LOT WIDTH, HARDCOVER - 1392 Baldur Park Road V Gross Lot Area 31,750 sf = 0.73 acre Portion in traveled road - 950 sf Net Lot Area 30,800 sf = 0.71 acre (Exceeds 0.5 acre min. of LR-IC zone) H--3 Lot Width: At shoreline: At 75' setback line: 97.5' (Exceeds 80% of 100' min. reqmt. for LR-1C Lot of Recor 113' (Exceeds 100' min reqmt.) Hardcover Zones: 0-75' North 75-250' 0-75' South Area=105'x75' = 7,875 sf± Area = 15,200 sf± (per Surveyor) Area = 30,800-7,875-15,200 = 7,725 sf ± ir EXISTING HARDCOVER; 0-75’ North: House (26.5x14.5) Deck / steps (8x12) + (4x4) 384 sf ni^ 496 sf / 7,875 = 63%(to 75-2:»0’;House (26.5x41.6)-384 Det. Garage (24.1x24.2)-(4x24.1) Driveway (1250+975+240) Steps, patios (5x6)+(4x30)+(6x9)+(6xl0) Timber walls & borders (0.5x100) 718 sf 488 sf 2,465 sf 264 sf 50 sf 3,985 sf / 15,200 = 26.2%Ion 0-75* South: Part Garage (4x24.1) Gravel Driveway (112+660+220+1056) Timber walls & borders (280x0.5) PROPOSED HARDCOVER; 96 sf 2,048 sf 140 sf 2,284 sf / 7,725 = 29.6%/‘f/6 fp'-'tS 0-75'North; NONE 0sf=0% 75-250’;House and Garage (See sketch) Patios and walks (See sketch) Driveway (See sketch) 3,364 sf 896 sf 1.728.sf 6,288 sf/15,200 = 41.4% 0-75’ South: Driveway (See sketch)605 sf / 7,725 = 7.8% Total Existing Hardcover = 496+3985+2284= 6,765 sf / 30,800 = 22%of total lot Total Proposed Hardcover = 6288+605 = 6,893 sf / 30,800 = 22.4% of total lot .^1 .'%• *. 1 .•1 Ij.. 1/ # 1 ---------------________________ •fe 1 \ N ,vy«v-S7 «»5.0A ovou )uvd %miyg V* Wn MIVM TVMiM '—C''Vi>lj t> F- -Ibyf —if'f'VxE «f^ r Of" Wei6.tt/&oej<iooi5» F&tfrfltiwrs EASt* 2>«iTA (D x: ^ • VD ^ 5694427 ^ ;j- E CITY COUNCIL 1? CITY City of r OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2831 A RESOLUTION GRANTING RENEWAL VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 & 2 AND SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8, AND GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 FILE #1544 TIUNSFER CNTCRI9 AUG 21 1990 Lu mi I MINN. CPUTY 0 WHEREAS, Roger and Becky Berry (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 1392 Baldur Park Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter City ) and legally described as follows: Lots 17 and 18, Block 1, Baldur Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have made application to the City of Orono for renewal of variances previously granted to permit construction of a new residence to replace the existing residence on the property, requiring a variance to Municipa Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 to permit a 2' encroachment past the average lakeshore setback line where no encroachment is normally allowed, and a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to allow hardcover in the southerly 0-75 and in the 75-250' zone in excess of the hardcover normally allowed in those zones, and for a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 and variance to Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 to permit the regrading of portions of the property located within the 0-75' lakeshore setbac)t zone where no grading is normally allowed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota; FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1544. 2. The property is located in the LR-IC Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The property is approximately 0.71 acres in area. Page 1 of 6 FyU ' .. ,§of; City of ORONO ; ,, s.. j m it*' 2831 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ^ ov;> NO. 4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed the original application #1363 on January 17, 1989 and February 21, 1989, and recommended approval of the applicants' revised request for variances and a conditional use permit based on the following findings: A) Hardcover is being totally removed from the northerly 0-75' zone and is not increasing in the southerly 0-75' zone. This is a substantial benefit to the property and to the neighborhood in regard to quality of runoff entering Lake Minnetonka. B) The hardcover increase in the 75-250' zone from 26.5% to 31.9% is justified by removals in the 0-75' zone, which yield a reduction from 8.8% to 0% hardcover in the northerly 0-75' zone. All of the proposed hardcover is necessary to preserve the substantial property rights of the owners in developing this property. C} The average lakeshore setback encroachment of 2' is appropriate given that the actual views of the lake enjoyed by neighboring property owners will substantially increase as a result of removal of the existing house. Furthermore, encroachment of the proposed house past the average setback line is necessary to preserve an existing mature oak tree on the property without redesigning the proposed residence. D) The variances requested are consistent with variances granted for upgrade of other residences in the Baldur Park neighborhood in recent years. E) The unique elevated nature of the property in relation to the surrounding properties, suggests- that the residence must be located near the highest elevation and further from the road in order to r>eneflt from the northerly view fo the lake, and therefore requires a longer driveway with its associated hardcover. Page 2 of 6 L rjT ‘V I(CITY 1 .ORONO -M City of ORONO , V*;.'':i j^Uf RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUrifciL NO. _2831 ________ F) Granting of the conditional use permit and variance for grading in the 0-75' zone is necessary to allow applicant to fill in the excavation that will remain after the existing house is removed^ with a blending in of the grade to existing contours. The applicants have revised the house plans so that their walkout concept can be developed without the need to change grades from those naturally occuring in the northerly 0-75' zone. In the southerly 0-75' zone, minor grade changes to reconstruct the driveway are necessary t- provide a safe and low-hardcover access to the property. 5. The Planning Commission reviewed application #1544 on June 18, 1990 and on a vote ol* 6-0 recommended approval, finding no changes proposed from the approval granted in Resolution #2587 adopted March 13, 1989. 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; Is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 7. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit for the proposed grading in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 3 of 6 WA \J -l . . • ’'^ . •/C^ITY City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 2831NO. CONCLUSIONSr ORDER AND CONDITIONS -TV •y"' Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zonking Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 to allow an encroachment of 2 past the average lakeshore setback zone where no encroachment is no-mallv allowed, and grants a variance to Section 10-22, Subdivision 2 to allow hardcover of 25.1% in the southerly 0-75 lakeshore setback zone where no hardcover is normally allowed, aSd allow 31.9% hardcover in the 75-250* setback 25' -ardcover is normally allowed, and grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 ® conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10-03' Subdivision 19 to allow regrading of the yard areas in the 0-75 lakeshore setback zone where filling and grading is normally not allowed, subject to the following conditions: 1. Construction shall adhere to the site plan attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. 2. All hardcover in the northerly 0-75’ lakeshore setback zone shall be removed. In the southerly 0-75* lakeshore setback zone, the existing detached garage shall be removed and the driveway shall be reconstructed in ® that hardcover in that zone shall not 4 940 the 75-250* zone, hardcover shall not exceed 31.9% or 4,94 s.f. The existing detached garage and hardcover surrounding it shall be removed, and a third garage attached to the proposed residence per the site plan, Exhibit A. 3. Per applicants' revised proposal, the grading in the northerly 0-75* zone shall be limited to that work necessary only to bring that excavation remaining from the residence back to pre-existing grades conforming with th shape and slope of the pre-existing topography. No cuts in the 0-75* setback zone have been approved *or creation o walkout. In the southerly 0-75* zone, grading is allowed as necessary to minimize the length and slope of the driveway as well as the hardcover associated with it. All areas in the 0-75 zone shall be immediately seeded or sodded after completion of grading, and all grading work on the property shall be subject to erosion control measures as may be required by the City. Page 4 of* 6 CITY OF ot6n-q. £9 City of OROrVQ-..s V • . i»V*‘ ' •.•'•■' '■ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCI NO. ^ 2831 ^ ' \-f applicant is advised that no additional hardcover ^%VVbe allowed on this property in excess of that granted with the current variance request, but any future proposal to add hardcover on the property might be approved only in conjunction with concurrent removals of existing hardcover, resulting in no net increase in hardcover on the property. 5. Applicants are further advised that the traveled portion of Baldur Park Road extends within the property boundaries and the City may at some future date request additional right-of-way to accommodate that roadway. (Granting of additional right-of-way is not a condition of the current variance approval.) 6. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (July 9, 1991). 7. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 8. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 9th day of July, 1990. ATT) Tidrbthy ( in, City C Jamfs R. Grabek,^ayor / * ' Property Owner( Page 5 of 6 CITY *■ OF ORONO STATE OP MINNESOT-^ COUNTY OF HENNEPIN City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2831 •V ) ss. ) xt ■■ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 9th day of July, 1990, by James R. Grabek 6 Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the <^it^ STATE OP MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS On this before me' appeared 3rd day of 5.^ ary Public within and RjPOJCu W county, Q r/^LA Cjtiry\6 _ _ 199 personally known to me to be the (^r^on^^ ^^^ribed in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. i STATE OP MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ known to metobethe person(s) described Tn and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 6 of 6 Tos 3B/ I. Date: Subject* Planning Commission Chairman Kelly Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bemhardson Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning s Zoning Administrator January 11, 1989 #1363 Roger « Becky Berry, 1j92 Baldur Park Road - V riance/CUP - Public Hearing . * ■ Soning Olst-ict - LR-lc, single fanlly, 1/2 acre, sewered Application - Request for variances for hardcover i - a.w : ■ LteVh^re^tel^.^^^'rone?*'’'- *«>r grade ;h:„;rs ‘tS’'o.r5 Liot of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - . Exhibit E - Exhibit P - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I - Exhibit J - Exhibit K - Exhibit L - Pertinent Facts - Application Plat Map Property Owners List S«^erwl?g 05^-^AcJc«owledge»ents Survey With Proposed Site Plan Preliminary Elevation Views Preliminary Floor Plans Proposed Grading Plan Hardcover Calculations Submitted Hardcover Review by Staff Baldur Park Area Variance Listing The property is bordered on the north and south ends bv sum^rl^ec^as follots! hardcover In the various zones is' 0~75‘(S) >5-250' 0-75'(N) TOTAL 0-75' (N & S) Existincr l,893“s.f .■ ?25.U) 4,110 1*.)?. (26.3%) 697 s.f. ( 8.8%) Proposed lf893 s.f. (25.1%) 6,043 s.f. (39.0%) 362 s.f. ( 4.6%) Zone Area 7,548 s.f. 15,500 s.f. 7,950 s.f. 2,590 s.f. (15.7%) 2,255 s.f. (14.6%) 15,498 s.f. ® hardcover decrease of 335 s.f. ovr^riii there is a net hardcover increase of 1,933 r.f ^ there is a net hardcover increase on*th¥“c7ot^»r^y of i -.n< I; th layout' In the north 0-75' zcno, the existing house encroachen in*r avcrnge ?;etbock zone. The proposed residence wi 1 ] ore- apyroxinv*. e 1 y S’ into the nver-rnie setback zcno, with dr-r-vr auproxinarely H* int o Mi.-t rcn*-. - • . <-r ^ • iS,nW< - * COMMUNICATIONS.MEDIA DIVISION ORIGINAL DOCUMENT IG OP POOR OUALITV Ip ' ‘ V fef fi&Y ’v ‘- ‘ tli Fl I ' • vX‘lit |b4.U^:P i fcj' ‘■i'T- 5. ;:l! iVV. ?t'4 "cpinq File •IJM Jopiirtry 11, llfl^ raqr 2 of 4 ••> - ■ ,. Tho o, 1M . r.n r-M ^crc,,chj.. 1V ,1 d<-Vrho un5^:o;'h!: ,horciin,. Th, ^^oK..»dshcrolino, with a dccK ^ shoroUnc. with a dock area houno at Its I J shrr^pllne. The j rot osrd hous'o construction n:^/c;".,U^r --".ur, m .Vnor.h n-7V ,cn„ The ,^HU■.■.^t, ,r, of -f “ V | U;\Vo*Tcr".'t ch'. ..ruc.or.-, .o A, u!;J<.’oV: -.in..rv v,M.rCf i. However, _ _L» Vnk treo nt the sruthrast corner of the,c trcM’rvo n a*- d.^mter red ^ required :e°uV;".iie?v^;rir':n'’d.'^r,uc,iqn or r^e. .ree. 4. oredlrq rler. Pr.ff ’^dV''';'''':^;':!:Vf'«n'Md^- erfllrhUJ^^ rhi. i.ererry. "’'''■^^'VlVMnSei T?e J.ii ree deeJe «Ut be buch ver.fy o'u b.n ex'V.leq eb.U beuee. The enlie.et. larqer and s|.r«.ad out nrule chnnqo;* near the house and In the are |.ro|.osinq to sake • . /heii house layout. The driveway area ■" h'rrofb» j • > Ib O--, re ev.-n our the eloie of :'h- ’d^.%'e ■u'y"’ ”in\v; «-;/;^;uo'h^;e^■•r^^:"e.T:r;oVe ‘qVor. q^,;' :.^:ur^-0. nbe- ;r fren£ . .he_h^ fboe. ^^;^,e^eMh''V-Ve'•7o;:e^^"VeTi^MVTV;^^:m herC-'r. Vy nnr? 100 riiMc \oTd5. n:e?2.vr‘;::;e^:» r'.;,T'r:.’u!;:: :-‘.\VrV.i.v'- hf'.i! I rn . OiRcuf^sion - , , litir.n n' •'n 5=r**>'l ,^^a.^ w hav- lefo.o u- ^ u:,) .U., TarV Po.V. house arc' ronstrurtion «'f p,,v , or • t «« 1 ■* * ar l-o.-n .M ourtt-n a* a 7e'T,:,!r;. V. rrrdVub^?:........... - t Ot 1 1 ^ ^ * o 4 rc s* •»•#'#'• ! f n? t * • I'f •■'T I • -’h#' p*'vi ? r i •'•*r c'* i.n i u ! • » : 1 id Ml oi s ? i* * * • « 1 ;' r I •' • • • r 1. ‘ f^rc*1‘ u| * • ♦ »'•’ \ p «> ♦ I • • Ill n. • I • u • % » • • V • I • 1 *. I t t p • •. ^ r 1 • ^ . .' *• ■ . ,. t • »•. *. • %••.*• * • * * . f * . . • • • . . . * . * I M I . • »• < 1 1 1 r « ? > • ! • I -•ill. 1 • # . •• • t t1 • • • • I • • • • * » ' • I • • • • » • • * N *jC’< :u'r. \,*a. » •1' ' m I •S'Li-tt* - » -A- COMMUNICATIONS.MEDIA DIVISION ORIGINAL DOCUMENT IS OR POOR OUALITV r.>- .•■,^^^•--'^1=^ ■•■A v'.'/ivV , y.-if *;y '-"v . • • V -i.' Wr-^ <’ 3 wfM w V Vi'-.,'. • \ l-Vn ''••'■ TXannlBg'CoKBlaBion.•»«^ty■* *“^ ••fc>»«ek SOBBB to CrOBtO ^i* . *' ‘ *• ‘r' •> / ‘ ■■ annlng' Cokb1««io» . ana vaw * r^*, "r^ifc.V^^at cuts In shorolino BotbBck iionoo iSShsfe^ tbo Motor*' ^!^t2f^M2^*woa*^Sroot^^i yro5«r wSdcoB-.oppllcotioa w^Fogo*^ * : in an»t». 0-7y acoao aooauJiot ViferiA/ Tho drlvovoy opron Moold oppoor to „»<>«. aun-o« r»t^«y ^^^ «“•*• ’*'* «»« *.l'tStir.i~ rJt»« q«..tl««bl.. B...a .« tB. loctlon of &7yroU.‘XV.»?«a*S; \^^ ;ri?AUf »=' •*•:-■ I th« n<wr houson • aogcrdlng hordcovor, th* "'**^'j[2^dl»lnl*ho^W*'*^ “^** 'hardcovor on th# property or# th# hordcovor incroo*## th# property# but th# ovoroll h*rdcov#r on th# property more #ignifleant than «" , 3®oo Th# enount of otructurolIncrea### from «#700 #.f. to about 3,300 e.f. Tn#^^ mcr#a## in tho 75- hardcovor on the high .« ..laur P.r. «... Exhibit L)> i ■■ ?A . '-4v ■ : ■-• I't....’’.-'-.KV/i- •-. • .*-•' t; iTAS* 4 :l .} ■ ’ ■' a v^f 'Vi? _____ »S 7 ‘ i a ’■ f ' V‘ * COMMUNiCATIONS.MEDIA DIVISION ORIGINAL DOCUMENT IS OP POOR DUALITY i“Vf r,u w...,—j •’«»???’2»;.~th to-; ‘ship vith tJ*« ;yrcjow6 bouoa. . ... ... ..; • . '\. . " . t-V^S V . .V' - ‘ ^ . o * ,. . • ; ‘ •* :*• . . ‘ '>•; j^^ocMAUbSaltiosi .• * ■ *' • • t r* ' ' ..•'<.'*'*••• "V J ♦.•..*» '.faova facta, coBoanU, and obaarvationa, ataff>oold «aka :- Baaad on tuo abovo £acr;», %fuutmmi v , :,r • . • • *.V'iS ' >. * foXlwlng rocoaaoadaUonai >1 I ■ ''^ ■ 1. Appllcanta ahottld :•. ‘ '• V «nC »c«th to attcapt to ««*• cloaa^ paat :::/;■• • • lalcAshoro aatbacka. Thla rcQOira»ant .wo«i« ^ , .-, ,, •>■'••V City pxartlca -lo : -•■'• -‘v , ■ ' ‘ ’ r, »vs.^nieanfcB should conaldar ronoval of tha ; 0£ n»*aTOV«* ----- , ^tiov ooaparsd to thoaa other caaaa. 4. pr...>»ti«n o, «t«. t^o 00 \V.\;”Kr.\Vl’rtS*.t?t«*Si “t«nsr”Vtl«l'h\«fcM.. ot tht. eo».t,.ctlo. .. »l.-o« *«. across the lake. 5. Tt. pr.po..o a problaa driveway •ituatlon. Retaining help the ?“d-4„VViV„.txr tt. lot u... .nd not on to neighboring properties, bring back an alternative site plan. fcltl ■ ^ •‘vv^§ i' A i - mm ifcl5?a **t 4 .;j-. •' ii'.' • feoposeC> CwtrTIM<» 4>p HOM*f "TO tf^At-KOlAT f(fcOp»SCC» .fr i'.f Aa^mmo S.5‘^® pf MoPose^ flUJN(* /'_5* J>tfP7ffS //» pAIVCWA*/ SC4l,e r^> t /•*sZH' s N* N D<9- ; K i 2C.2 :w r ^ • $ % 9 9 •V'h h ■»..! •• ' ••■• - ••' • -;t-T77^ %% V \ ^\ r r»iX V-if- X p>-.\ ^ If ^ * , ••il* :>* ^ y •'. >■%■ -M2»JXB8 or VBB rXAKVXHQ COWCTSSIOr -1"' .* I nmn jMnaitir ;989 ' Ai'*.. ■V-"* . • ■'V ,^ « *- ^ / J'. [;• . ‘ V . y^: rIv: \A' . il .♦•" ‘ •X*f * * * 1: y A-. t • • * ... g% . V'*V •. • •• It* * ■ '•:;: •Vo' vc - • ' ■ V-'i. J'V." :m/. io»:xBO rzu «i3«2-aasBi ccMsnnD ‘ Ws^' th<) applicant if ha bad diacaaaad thia propoaal with bia aaiohhora? Mr. Banaar rapliad that ha had and tha neighbor to tha couth had no objactiona. Mr. Scheanwattar anplainad that 'tha . noiabbor to tha north had no.opinion* aainly bacauaa ha .was a^lung hia houaa and aorlag to Vlarida. v.' ^ Bollowa coBoentod that tha *laap frogging* circuBatanca^aa t:rVicalIy conaidorad whan ravlawing avaraga lakashora satbaeks. Sha questioned what would happen to tha property directly north O'J Hr. £&Qaar*a. Caffron dapletad tha lakashora setbacks for the' propartioa to tha north. Xallay observed that ,if one wara^.to c. .*aw a line batvoon tha two houses on ths north to tha south#V'lt woald run out into tha lake. The saaa would occur on the south ^•5 sida. Thia is typical of properties located on pointa^^dr ^ ^ I ^ ^ 1 a. i i run m ■ j ifpeninsula's* as is this property. Thera ware no cosiMata fron tha public regarding this nattar it'.d tha public bearing was closed. ■ 'A r . • >' ‘W It was 'Bovad by Chairaan Xallay* seconded by Planning Centadsaionar Cohen* to racoasand a^roval of application #1362* subject to a hardcover reduction of 417 s.f. froa whatever source available* and to approve the avaraga lakashora satbaok.*'as defined. The hardships of this application would be tha property b..iog located on tha point and tha addition being 160* fron the l.->;oAhora. Notion* Ayas"7* Kaya*0* Notion pasaad. • / \ 4- • • *V« J ■ vlj!d3 KOOSa a B3CXT 3SXBY ljSl2 BAXXOa PABX XCAS V.\RIASC2S Pl'TAlC BSASaXC di42 P.M. - 8iS5 P.N. ^ V ; Tha Affidavit of Publication and Cartifieata of Mailing ware duly noted. Tha applicants wars prasant for this Matter. a* As explained by Assistant Planning and Soning Administrator CafTron* tha Barry's wars saaking variancaa in order to daaollah an axisting rasidanca and rebuild. Currently tha hardcover on tha property conalats of a detached garage* as wall as a driveway that continues uphill to tha existing house. Tha proposal calls for a new residence with a porch* deck and attached garage. The drivotsy would raatain in tha sane area, but would bacoaa aligt.tly st iepar. It is tha intention of tha Barry's to naintain tha detached garage. In order to access tha new* attached garage* it will be necessary to raise a portion of tha yard by bringing in fill ia the south 0-75' tone. Tha Barry's are proposing a walk out which will raquira grading to be done within ^a north 0-75* zone. One of the raasona tha Barry's preferred not to locate the house further back to meet tha average setback* la to prasarva a Mture rad oak tree. Gaffron said It would be necessary to make a 2* cut in order to achieve tha walk-out. Planning Conmissionar Bellows axprassad her reservations of 8 V .4-‘ • -f ’V , * vO .' • ^Ktmrsns .or nMoixin a • ' .1’ "*• 8SZ0H aXloving vnrinncos for a now ronltfoaeo. Sho folt that a valk-out e^ouid 'only ocsor as a raoult of tba axlstiag topography of tho -Xo^r 'o«horwiM »aotb«r plan.should bo osod. This wenld bo oapacially trto if grading In'tho 0-75* aono woro aooosaary to achieve a veXk-oat. Mr. &orxy'oxplainod that tho walk-out would cot exuAtd that such difforonco than cho oxiating basoMat* . :'.t... ... . -. . ' • *. » * i Mr. Kod Ltuid* the Oovolopor for tho Borry's* prosontod photo'jrupbs shoving tho oxisting rosidoneo# garago and tho oak trtii. £e.gavv a brief description of what ha was proposing to acco.;;?liah. Planning Conaissioaor Hanson did not boliovo tho proposed hoana fit woll with the sito. Sousen ^aetioned vhothor tho oak troo would survivo tho construction. Mr. Lund had coasultod a profossional. who infoxatod hia that the troo would bond toward its roots? honeo this troo appoarod to hays its aain roots away froa tho aroa to bo dioturbod. Ho also had an oatiaato froa a troo aorvico that valued such a troo at $4*400.00. Planning Conaissioaor Johnson beliovod that any grading that occurred would threaten the oak tree. •. -.v • . \ Planning Coaaissioner Brown said that the' Planning Comaiasion had been fairly oonaistant in making naw atruotures conforn. Johnson coaaantsd that Baldur Park Road was a uniqua arcs that acunod to consistantly roqulra varlaneas. Bowevar* dua to the 3/4 ccreu chat the Berrys had to work with* he did not believe there should bo e need for variencos. Tliorc varo no costasata froa ths public rsgerdihg this aettor and the public bearing was closed. Xt was aovsd by Planning Coaaisslonor Cohan* seconded by Planning Coomissionar Nooa* to table this itoa. Holley provided soao direction for the applicants. The Planning Coaodasion did not want to aoe any hardcovar or cutting and filling on tho north aide in tha 0-75*. Nlthln tho 0-75* sons on the south aide the attached garage oust bo offset by raaoval of the detached garage. Mr. Berry expressed hia dasira to build a throe-car garago If tho d«. tachod garage had to ha raaovad. Within tha 75-250* sons it wa tho concensus of tha Planning Conaiaaion not to allow aore tha^i 30% hardcover. They also wanted the applicants to adhere to tho average lakashore setback. Bellows inforaed tha applicants that coapllance with the Planning Coaalaaion's raq.iasts would cause a substantial reduction in tho also of the house. Kelley suggeated that a footprint be drawn prior to an actual house plan. Tho applicant queatlonod tho Planning Conalsslon's opinion regarding tho walk-out. Xolley atatsd that they >tould not allow a walk-out to bo cut on tho north oido if it required grading in tho 0-75' sono. Tho natural contours of tho property nust rojnain. Motion* Ayes—7* Nays—0* Motion passed. 9 , *9^**o> • \ t cm 07 oRcso ! • P.O.'Box 66 Cxyatal Bay» MU ,, 5$323 * 472-7357 Data of Noticot 1/24^9 1* V*' I «0( Roger « Becky Berry 1392 Baldur Perk Road Weyzeta# MR .55391 a'- oonss rot Rod Lund ftoodrldge Corporation 10800 Lyndale Ave 6, St','234' S BlooMiagton, »Qi 55420 .1 »V yxpB C/ APPLZCATIOBt Variance V S w BA3B 07 MSmilGt 1/17/89 voni 7 Per 0 Againat /?* V Planning Ceaaisaiou recoaneads tbe fellowlBgt Tabled for reaaona noted below • •' 1 V .4 B0T2S AUD SP2CIAL CCODZTICiBSt i' U '•••. Tabled to allow applicants opportunity to revise proposal: ..' direction given to applicants by Planning Ccsodasiont General 1.Northerly 0-75' Zonei a) Elininate all hardcover. b) No cut/flll/grading except as necessary to restore old basenent excavation to blend with existing grades. 2.Southerly 0-75* Eonei . . ^ ^a) Reduce or eliminate hardcover associated with detached garage. Consider replacing detached garage with attached 3-stall garage. 3.75-250' Zonal a) Meet average setback if possible. b) Limit hardcover to 30% (4,650 s.f.) in 75-250' sons. Applicants' next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of revised proposal. Deadline for the Tuesday, February 21, 1989 meeting is Monday, February 13, 1989 or March 13, 1989 for the March 20, 1989 meeting. In all cases, the application must be continued with the submittal of requested information within 90 days or the City will consider tho application as formally withdrawn. If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (473—7357). If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commiasio.i. . e * 4 r *t “ ir -u* r 4-f Orono Comprehensive Plan: Review Re: Lakeshore Alterations The 1980 City of Orono Community Management Plan ("Comprehensive Plan") contains a number of general land use and environmental protection goals and policies with which the proposed land alteration would be inconsistent. Specifically, General Land Use Policy No. 6 on page 4-13 indicates that "lake shorelines will be protected from alteration. Shoreland areas, whether bluff, beach or flood plain, are sensitive environmental features with significant impact on lake water quality, aesthetic values and land use function. These same factors act to draw development which can be destructive if not properly regulated. Natural vegetation in shoreland areas will be preserved insofar as practical and reasonable in order to retard surface runoff and soil erosion, and to utilize excess nutrients. Clear cutting will be prohibited ...". In General Land Use Policy No. 13, the Comprehensive Plan states "future developments must enhance the environment. Land development should respect and enhance the unique natural features of the site and the general environmental assets of the community. Preservation of natural views, vegetation, drainage and general respect for unique site features always producing more aesthetic results and lasting value for the property owner and the community than does wholesale alteration of the landscape or mathematical division to the highest possible density." The Environmental Protection Goals on page 3-20 include the following: "Lake shorelines will be protected from alteration. Natural vegetation in shoreland areas will be preserved insofar as practical and reasonable in order to retard surface runoff and soil erosion, and to utilize excess nutrients. Clear cutting will be prohibited. In areas of soil or wave action erosion, natural stone rip rap shoreline protectioii will be encouraged." The City has on numerous past occasions relied on these and other principles contained within the Comprehensive Plan, to deny land alteration conditional use permits and specifically, variances for grading within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone, in cases where excavation and lowering of the natural lakeshore grades was proposed in order to, for instance, allow the creation of a walkout residence. The City has long taken the position that such excavations create an artificial and unnatural lakeshore appearance. 4-^ I AND USE JUNE, 1980 3 DEVELOPMENT DENSITY WILL BE LIMITED THROUGHOUT THE CITY TO A LEVEL WHICH WILL NOT OVERLOAD THE NATURAL SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE AND FILTRATION SYSTEM. Urbanization increases the speed and quantity of surface runoff while decreasing the water quality. Developed land use densities will be determined by comparison between known levels of volume and pollution generation and known marshland capacity for ponding and nutrient assimilation. 4. THE WETLANDS AND MARSHLANDS OF THE CITY WILL BE PROTECTED AND PRESERl^D AS WILDLIFE HABITATS, AS UNIQUE OPEN SPACES, AND AS THE ONLY ECONOMICALLY PRACTICAL METHOD OF FLOOD PROTECTION AND STORM WATER RUNOFF FILTRATION. Wetlands, drainageways and floodplains will be protected from encroachment and from alteration or destruction by filling, grading, excavation or drainage. Wherever possible, the City will acquire open space and flowage ease ments for conservation of these lands. 5. PROTECTION OF LAKE RESOURCES WILL ALLOW REASONABLE ACCESS, USE AND ENJOYMENT WHILE PREVENTING OVERCROWDING AND EXCESSIVE ENCROACHMENT. In conformance with Mn. DKR shoreline Management regulations for recreational development lakes, Orono will prohibit overly dense development within 1,000 feet of Lake Minnetonka. Lake use regulations will be promoted to limit excessive boat density and overuse of sensitive bays. Land use regulations will be developed to provide reasonable control over building density, land alteration and lakeshore encroachment. 6. LAKE SHORELINES WILL BE PROTECTED FROM ALTERATION. Shoreland areas, whether bluff, beach or floodplain, are sensitive environmental features with significant impact on lake water quality, aesthetic values and land use function. These same factors act to draw development which can be destructive if not properly regulated. Natural vegetation in shoreland areas will be preserved insofar as practical and reason able in order to retard surface runoff and soil erosion, and to utilize excess nutrients. Clear- cutting will be prohibited. In areas of soil or wave action erosion, material stone rip rap shoreline protection will be encouraged. CMP 4-13 ^“3 LAND USE JUNE, 1980 13. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT MUST ENHANCE THE ENVIRONMENT. Land development should respect and enhance the unique natural features of the site and the general environmental assets of the community. Preservation of natural views, vegetation, drainage and general respect for unique site features always produces more aesthetic results and lasting value for the property owner and the community than does wholesale alteration of the landscape or mathematical division to the highest possible density. 14. PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE NEW DEVELOPMENT MUST BE PROVIDED BY THE DEVELOPER. Whenever required, improvements must be provided by the developer. Because the City has limited staff and limited bonding potential, physical improvements such as roads, drainage and utilities required to accommodate new subdivisions or development should be designed, financed and installed directly by the benefited ijev^Xoper as a precondition to increased land use density. In addition, this philosophy includes developer responsibility for special fire protection equipment or devices in the case of unusual land uses or building configura tions, and/or special security services in the case of unusual public safety situations. 15. ALL PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS MUST CONFORM TO CITY STANDARDS. Physical Improvements related to health, safety or community systems such as roads, pathways, drainage or utility systems will be designed, located and constructed to uniform. City- established standards to ensure proper functioning and compatibility with overall City plans. 16. DEVELOPERS MUST DEDICATE LANDS REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC USE. Land subdivision or any development that results in increased land use density, and hence increased demand for municipal services, will be expected to include public dedication of lands necessary for additional road rights of way, parks, playgrounds, open space, ponds or storm water holding areas whenever such facilities are directly used by the subdivided land or required by such density increase. CMP 4-15 FNVIRQNMENT JUNE, 1980 6. THE WETLANDS AND MARSHLANDS OF THE CITY WILL BE PROTECTED AND PRESERVED AS WILIMiIFE HABITATS, AS UNIQUE OPEN SPACES, AND AS THE ONLY ECONOMICALLY PRACTICAL METHOD OF FLOOD PROTECTION AND STORM WATER RUNOFF FILTRATION. The Harza Study, the 208 Water Quality Management Study, and Orono's Surface Water Management Plan all recommend this approach to permanent water guality management for Lake Minnetonka, In addition, the Orono Plan goes on to identify individual wetlands and marshlands that require protection as part of the City's storm water management program. It is the policy of this plan to effectuate the policies and recommen dations of the 1974 Orono Surface Water Management Plan. 7 PROTECTION OF THE CITY'S MARSHLAND, WETLANDS AND DRAINAGEWAYS SHALL INCLUDE PROTECTION OF ADJOINING LANDS AND PREVENTION OF DRAINAGE, FILLING, DREDGING OR WETLAND'S VEGETATION REMOVAL. Ordinances will establish setbacks for all land alteration or construction. Wherever possible, the City will acquire open space and flowage easements for conservation of these lands. 8. PROTECTION OF LAKE RESOURCES WILL ALLOW REASONABLE ACCESS, USE AND ENJOYMENT WHILE PREVENTING OVERCROWDING AND EXCESSIVE ENCROACHMENT. In conformance with Mn. DNR Shoreline Management regulations for recreational development lakes, the City will prohibit overly dense development within 1,000 feet of Lake Minnetonka. Lake use regulations will be promoted to limit excessive boat density and overuse of sensitive bays. Land use regulations will be developed to provide reasonable control over building density, land alteration and lakeshore encroachment. 9. LAKE SHORELINES WILL BE PROTECTED FROM ALTERATION. Natural vegetation in shoreland areas will be preserved insofar as practical and reasonable in order to retard surface runoff and soil erosion, and to utilize excess nutrients, Clearcutting will be prohibited. In areas of soil or wave action erosion, natural stone rip rap shoreline protection will be encouraged. 10. LAKE BED ALTERATIONS WILL BE DISCOURAGED BECAUSE OF ADVERSE SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM EFFECTS ON WATER QUALITY. Dredging of lake beds releases large amounts of otherwise trapped nutrients and silt which adversely affects water quality for long periods of time. Dredging of new channels or inlets will not be approved to provide riparian access where none existed naturally. Dredging will be permitted in limited circumstances only where absolutely necessary to maintain existing natural riparian access permanently lost by something beyond the ^ control of the landowner. Periodic lew water conditions or the owner's desire for deeper draft watercraft are not sufficient reasons for disrupting sensitive lake beds. CMP 3-20 iim nni ana 10! W^M»rnTi RWTiTTt Hi 15EmTjTiatiEia»i^^lYii [t] IMI ti LHi W fl tlOJ ri ■ RTWiWITjflt H¥H fltBl wn«t] liTililitWnVIt] y‘•'L - • Iil4»W« iiJiLO ^MtlO MfTi] [i[^ area. The Sixth Avenue North beim will be 625' by 65’ and 10 ft. high, requiring 4,500 cubic yards. #2382 Busse Construction is proposing to level ^ ^ Ss^^' property at 425 Tumham Road. Mr. 0««“ Ito frnm the house (314 m) to the rear property line (307 m). He wouia luce to level this area and use it for lawn. Tte 3,925 cubic yards of fill to cover an area 220 by 180 m size. alternate site should be located. and ^387 Busse ConstrucUon is proposing to locate a berm on the Gehrinan property ,>t axno Sixth Avenue North that would follow the property luies m to norto“ t comer of the parcel. A ponic i of toe ^ “ SbW " to be on toe Colgrove property. Suff has prepared rSoTfor this property in case Busse m^s to be on or wttom 5 of the property line shared by Colgrove and Gehrman. The area to be filled wUI require approximately 17,310 cubic yards of ra Z Z! alteration needs to be at least 26' from to. edge of any wetlands on site. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Appro e ail conditional use permits for Busse Construction for land alteration, subject to toe conditions outlined in toe staff report as follows; «f82:.S;S'feIS;,g"^^ «•> and asmbiishment of ground cov« SsT-sepS testing before hauling any fill and establishment of ground cover COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To amend or approve the enclosed resolutions. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISIONS 19-21 AND SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISIONS 8-14 FILE m%i WHEREAS, James Johnson and Charles Larson, (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the properties located at 4300 Watertown Road, and 4285 Sixth Avenue North, respectively, within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as: 4300 Watertown Road (31-118-23 13 0013) Lots 1, 2, 3 of Block 1 and Lots 1, 2, 3 of Block 2 and Outlot A of Mark One, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and 4285 Sixth Avenue North (31-118-23 12 0005) That part of the West 385 4/10 feet of East 695 05/100 feet of North 1532 9/10 feet of West half of Northeast quarter lying South of County Road No. 6, all in Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 20, 1998, at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19-21 and Section 10.55, Subdivisions 18-14 to permit construction of berms as shown in Exhibits A and B. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: Page 1 of 7 3. FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2381. The property is located in the RR-IA Zoning District, where 5 acres is the minimum lot area. The Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 20, 1998 and recommended approval on a vote of 6 to 0. 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: A. The proposed land alteration will not interfere with drainage patterns on adjacent property nor impact any wetlands. B. The proposed land areas to be altered will be seeded with a mixture that provides natural vegetation compatible with the surrounding environ.*. 5. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the construction of berms will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of die City. 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicants and the affect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivisions Page 2 of 7 2. 3. 19-21. and Section 10.55, Subdivisions 8-14 to permit construction of berms as shown in Exhibits A and B, subject to the following conditions: 1. The construction company, Busse Construction, on behalf of the prope^ owners will adhere to an erosion control plan and establish natural vegetation in the land alteration area. Applicants shall adhere to the construction plans as submitted. Authorities granted by this resolution are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a buUding permit within one year of the date of CouncU approval or this conditional use permit will expire on that date (July 27, 1999). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 27th day of July, 1998. 4. 5. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 3 of 7 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of July, 1998, by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee. Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono. a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of ^ 199_before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to’ be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 7 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199_before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared ____________________________^--------------------- known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. I*** Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199_before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared___________________________^^---------------- known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 5 of 7 1 > ) ►d OQ (D O I V. \ . \ 3oKns»or\ / 6?AS^ •P'sf y f-*«i' txswk. ^5*'CME: 's/>" ^ ■3o\srsSsof\ SaVc (to ^ OQ (to O hh 7 • t • i •i . t » I • • ■ A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISIONS 19-21 AND SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISIONS 8-14 FILE nm. WHEREAS, Tim Otten, (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 425 Tumham Road, within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: The South four acres of the East five eights of the East half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 31, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Plarming Commission held a public hearing on July 20, 1998, at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19-21 and Section 10.55, Subdivisions 18-14 to permit alteration of the rear yard as shown in Exhibit A. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2382. 2. The property is located in the RR-IA Zoning District, where 5 acres is the minimum lot area. Page 1 of 5 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 20, 1998 and recommended approval on a vote of 6 to 0. 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: A. The proposed land alteration will not interfere with drainage patterns on adjacent property nor impact any wetlands. B. The proposed land areas to be altered will be seeded with a mixture that provides natural vegetation compatible with the surrounding environs. 5. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to permit land alteration in the rear yard will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire haz^d or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the affect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19-21, and Section 10.55, Subdivisions 8-14 to permit land alteration in the rear yard, subject to the following conditions; 1 . The construction company, Busse Construction, on behalf of the projierty owner will adhere to an erosion control plan and establish natural vegetation in the land alteration area. Page 2 of 5 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Applicant shall adhere to the construction plans as submitted. Before any dirt is hauled onto the property, Busse Construction will provide information to City staff demonstrating that an alternate septic site exists on the property that will not be affected by the land alteration. Authorities granted by this resolution are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval or this conditional use permit will expire on that date (July 27, 1999). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of tWs resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terais of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 27th day of July, 1998. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 3 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instniment was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of July 1998 by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee. Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono. a Minnesota mumcipal corporation and said instniment was executed on behalf of the City. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) )ss. ) Notary Public On this day of .»199 _before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the persc'(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of .»199 _before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared _____________________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 • • \v*:*.* *• • S 2*v. •• % • >*A.\ . • • • ‘ ♦ •. *v ’ • wj:'* *• •«« • • • '. •» •* :v.-: •. . V •* -■»•* . • •• ' ••• •••• .• #•••** f . I ♦ Dt-t^ 2>HZ6 c-.\ • • •«• • • • X /«D W 0<aP •*. • ••V . \ * •• *' .y’! vv*' # # • ..V #. •••• *. • • •V • t % * •...* .. • • •#* ••VV ** ••••.A A * I ^5 Exist. House 4** PVC Oeonouls •• A a* . •• # <• V ‘ a • *•• # •• t • • • • ’t • -• • .migrri k Exist. louse ^4- pvc Oeonouts mmt A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISIONS 19-21 AND SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISIONS 8-14 FILE #2386 WHEREAS, Katherine Colgrove, (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 4260 Sixth Avenue North, PID 31-118-23 12 0007 within the City of Orono (hereinafter "Ci^/") and legally described as follows: f. m a. Block 1, Sharon Hills, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Commission held a public hearing on July 20, 1998, at which times all persons desirmg to be heard concerning this application were given the opportumty to speak thereon, and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a conditioiml ^ permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivismns 19-21 and Section 10.55. Subdivisions 18-14 to permit land alteration as shown in Exhibit A. Minnesota: 3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2386. The property is located in the RR-JA Zoning District, where 5 acres is the minimum lot area. The Planning Conunission reviewed this application on July 20, 1998 and recommended approval on a vote of 6 to 0. Page 1 of 5 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: A. The proposed land alteration will not interfere with drainage patterns on adjacent property nor impact any wetlands. B. The proposed land areas to be altered will be seeded with a mixture that provides natural vegetation compatible with the surrounding environs. 5. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to permit land alteration will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the affect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19-21, and Section 10.55, Subdivisions 8-14 to permit land alteration as shown in Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions: 1.The construction company, Busse Construction, on behalf of the property owner will adhere to an erosion control plan and establish natural vegetation in the land alteration area. Applicant shall adhere to the construction plans as submitted. Before any dirt is hauled onto the property, Busse Construction will provide information to City staff demonstrating that an alternate septic site exists on the property that will not be affected by the land alteration. Page 2 of 5 5. 6. Authorities granted by this resolution are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval or this conditional use permit will expire on that date (July 27, 1999). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of herself, her heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 27th day of July, 1998. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 3 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of July, 1998, by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. f I' ) ■ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) Notary Public ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of ^ 199_before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared __________________________________________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Notary Public On this day of ^ 199_before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared _________________________________________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. ! i Notary Public Page 4 of 5 A* i' . . --rv.r 6^h^maiv^( cj>Lc^ius><- n,^io o.vj . ^^hibU k • • JO -Pe+ T)c>4p Garage ' '' Page 5 of 5 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISIONS 19-21 AND SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISIONS 8-14 FILE #2387 WHEREAS, Robert Gehrman, (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 4300 Sixth Avenue North. PID 31-118-23 12 0019 within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: lx)ts 2 and 3 and Outlots A and B, Sharon Hills, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Stahites and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hewing on July 20, 1998, at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a conditional use ^mit per Mumcipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19-21 and Section 10.55 Subdivisions 18-14 to permit land alteration as shown in Exhibit A. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1 . This appl'nation was reviewed as Zoning File #2387. 2. The pr-ywH «s located in the RR-IA Zoning District, where 5 acres is the minimu;n ’r t i,-ea. 3.The Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 20, 1998 and recommended approval on a vote of 6 to 0. Page 1 of 5 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: A. The proposed land alteration will not interfere with drainage patterns on adjacent property nor impact any wetlands. B. The proposed land areas to be altered will be seeded with a mixture that provides natural vegetation compatible with the surrounding environs. 5. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to permit land alteration will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property wUl be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the affect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Coi^il hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19-21, and Section 10.55, Subdivisions 8-14 to permit land alteration as shown in Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions: The construction company, Busse Construction, on behalf of the property owner will adhere to an erosion control plan and establish natural vegetation in the land alteration area. Applicant shall adhere to the construction plans as submitted. Authorities granted by this resolution are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval or this conditional use permit will expire on that date (July 27, 1999). 1. 2. 3. Page 2 of 5 4.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be pumshable as a misdemeanor. 5.The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 27th day of July, 1998 ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Cleric Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of July, 1998, by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 5 9 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of ,t 199 _before me a Notary Public within I and for said county, personally appeared ______________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199 _before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared ________________ known lo me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public ; i Page 4 of 5 C(^LUf(Lao^- n,^io o>\ ^P^vWvV fV • • SOo -fief K P30 -pie't )0 99. GoroQe Page 5 of 5 8 6ne (612^8' m}.j^' ifn;siiIb; »• ^ iiy7 v>;.t*;%^-‘:•* •• (73-2070 il;*;;:; 13001 Belle Plaine Trail belle plaine, MINNESOTA 66011 ^^36 >, ^3?3, 'c^35'1 June 29,1998 CityofOrono Request to temporarily stockpile soil on Oic Bob Gdutnan property, 4300 6* Avenue Northed Ae Jim Johnson property, 4300 Watertown Road, until the request for land alteration can be presented to the Planning Commission. This reqiuest is made to allow die property owners die opportunity to make mudi needed improvemCTts to dreir properties as well as improve drainage by utilizing the excess dirt frorn the County Road 6 Project Unfortuiwtely the drawings showing die proposed fill, needed for the Planning Commission, w« not completed in time for the June meetings. And, since the County 6 road construction cannot be delayed, we would like to stockpile this excess dirt at diese locations. The proposed fill areas are not buildable lots. On Bob Gduman’s property we will be hauling to Outiot B which is a pasture and Jim Johnson’s property has already fiiUed pcrc testing and cannot be developed. I hope die City of Orono will consider the unique circumstances, the availability of excess nght to property owners who need and want this fill, the tight time restrictions of the road construction and aflow us to stockpfle the dirt for these property owners. Patrick Brazil Busse Constniction, Inc. An Equal Opportunity Employer - Contractor I I > I . ^1* \ , / '»• • T :/•. Xi •• • ^ I** eneKN^ 3 r-. <i hMtN ^0^ i'^'v '/ »ni6\ v-ti^ C\\*^ v,'^“i'« U *» • • ^. -W . . , r.. •. . 'vor.'i-t* V i; •:v,3.>cv -''tiv^int ' '.•Wi ^ -ii?.- •• i/. •1 v*V-; ;> ;*^:-v C-: M i*v;\. it:' i-% • ^ 't7.V .•-i 'r -r te t m'Is5:« (#■ '^«n ; r -i-1 :S ». 1 SI B« ftm .V'AK< iai!i i''Mi iX' •»'! * '•: # I'* V".v*_- %:*• H\y ..•vy.» iW ;fl Vy fc'-.* "V rr£ ••fe l.:r c\ 4.^ yA 'Ay Wi44av4i>y A< j?. r/iii »'f l-’y-i'/- -r>:’MMy'vL'o:*:';f 'vBV ^Oon- c^v^hd^A-V -)T</p^ii^ V?Nj ^O0(^ t:: L^<;T2SoM • .* # • 542 y/iv":»:J'-t ^y:ri m rj>.• #.• . V*-vT O. .«. :tV;**»•*>* ‘c^. Va‘ ^4?#:iv «> 11»^ ' -f.• / ? • ■■; ':•-V, Vr-^ srw‘ kw^r !S S%> ?:r"::..• 4 d/i -‘5?>■v /•airfST y A' ■' i'»( sm^if'‘3>-.< ;u7>j m V- • , ^ .% •3N/ v-r-r ww r5>#0*s* ^•*i>;4**4- /. L ^^1 M'o f.S 2;-.'V:;-• .* ik2SS\t^ifv cov^^l “ fcpow ^ l7,/3l/2>O0l ^Ip joiwati 4300 vJMEtrbwN --------------------------------------- XVj^ m f r.T^/•TH /'j 1 •*• 4 //111/.b>.S .C •X.''/* "* '■ill r*ii7ffnn7 VYiw> ^^y^A >y.f'^'?) 1' V's li ■ iA ' ■'\ .*^' s : I I. • t'lV i:/ /' #'* /lO* :i‘'^■ K ■ ^ !<'V\' v.V*y Xv /fjy. )H\; \-iiV'.;' .^.U •-L:'/<7k; ■•?<iv >•< It ‘ J , • $'4A ’ ?/X '*■•••!'■• •• ’.V .57/5: A 4 l^.l '.'.''M •K S'.y. ^^^ ‘ F7T1 % mn£ Ik ^uc<v\4 -ir<f<?^ii;; dG ^23^^ Az^<^ aicnv.N>ie.H I v/ .V*.'w *h* .^.r:" C-;'' •^•-•V ♦ J* , •• «FN »t; , • • ■»• '^'‘?\i.<S\Vj ■-'. '‘-"*'":;isSK- ■•; F7^ttV;^ , by ^,.- EtToWi^ v ’’''- a /^Pp^x IM KTt LOCNlOVi CsP* TO:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Liz Van Zomeren, City Plann*' '/Zoning Administrator DATE:July 16,1998 SUBJECT:#2381 Busse Construction, on behalf of James J. Johnson, 4300 Watertown Road Charles Larson, 4285 Sixth Avenue North Conditional Use—Public Hearing Zoning District: • RR-1A One Family Rural Residential (5 acres) Application:Busse Construction is working on the County Road 6 project for Hennepin County. Due to the cut and fill process for the road work, Busse Construction needs to find locations near the project to haul excess dirt. Property owners in the area have requested fill. Land alteration of this magnitude requires a conditional use permit. The land alteration along Sixth Avenue North will be 625' by 65' and 10ft. high requiring 4,500 cubic yards of fill. The land alteration along Watertown Road will be 230' by 250' and 7 ft. deep requiring 10,650 cubic yards of fill. Pertinent Ordinances: Section 10.03, Subd. 19 and 20 Findings: 1.That the proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Chapter and the purposes of the district in which the site is located and Comprehensive Municipal Plan; The proposed location of the fill along Watertown Road and Sixth Avenue North will not have a deleterious effect on the rural character or residential use of the surrounding properties. #2381 Johnson/Larson July 20.1998 page-1 2. That the proposed location of the conditional use and the proposed condition under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, * * safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed location for the fill areas is awayfrom the existing septic sites. Both the Johnson and Larson property have non-compliant septic systems that must conform by . 2007 and2006, respectively. Staff has visually inspected the area and has determined that there is space available for alternate sites. 3. That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Chapter. The, <q>plicant is required to grade the areas according to the topographic exhibit submitted. The areas shall be properly seeded and established to natural vegetation Staff Recommendation To approve the conditional use permit to alter land on the Johnson and Larson property as submitted, subject to grading and seeding for natural vegetation. Attachments Application Topo for area along Sixth Avenue North Topo for area along Watertown Road Plat map Property Owner’s list Survey Septic Info—4300 Watertown Road Septic Info-4285 Sixth Avenue North U238I Johnson/Larson July 20, 1998 page-2 Application if ^ Date Received CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION Amount Paid -t* PROPERTY LOCATION \ ' Q A . Site Address ■ ^^1300 \JJe»^'CvTdIu/y/ vC^Cfi |/s—------------ Type of Application to be Filed Z.o«igi -4 l4g->o3h o C HrlK. Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 31- US'* ^5 __L3— APPLICANT ^ u Name lAt^txyf Address »- />/ . Phone fhome ’l ^0*7 -* 3 Phone fworlc l CP/3 «r - Ca > 73 F C^cu^lfiT City A»lr^-fg>w— Zip—-^?I2 OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone Qiome ) ^7 ^'"3/ > /------- Name X ^<^Hhl90N_________ Phone(work).^------- A^c\r^Jifsoo u)^r£^ro/A// hp citiRfipij r^^/AL zip ----- Daje-Property Acquired __ _________ I ^SoTa^o ®^so own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - ______$ 75.00 For each variance request with CUP application ______$175.00 Residential Accessory Use ______$250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) ^ ______$225.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments _____$200.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $300.00 Commercial/Industrial Use (month/year) y* $250.00 Land Alteration _____ Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining wdls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule $150.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) Afler-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS ______$250.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) ______$300.00 Vacation ______$200.00 Easement Vacation ______$100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision ______$350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) ______$350.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment ______$100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. ~ Describe request in detdl. 3. X Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Government Center, 348-3271). X Certificate of Survey-.(signed by a licensed surveyor) -.refer to handout, for.s’lrvey information. ' * ’ ' ’ . • • ^ ___Attach legal description to’apj)1ication if not included on required survey. y Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve . . changes in elevation (grades). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in - ^ • - MW • , m m m m ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 4... 7. • the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s), 8. '____Construction plan, if applicable (see staff -for requirements). 9. _____As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other .persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR COPY FOR REPRODUCTION (11" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff: Date APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant-hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his^er knowledge. Applicant’s signature Date OWNER’S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members,' and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner ’s signature Date ^ I^ ^ Applicant must have VlLsubmittals into the CHy offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meet’mgs are held on the th’nd Monday of each month. Applicanls must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Plann'ing Commission and Council. If an applicant b unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this changejirior to the meeting. jS'-Z-T-f <? . 7 • 9 \ 0o\\r\SoOv S\Vc 0}I10•• 3 3c > s K) (« ^30 ic “I deep IO,6^o 4) • • •• • . • •• •D U) o o c ■it ^..3 g • •L -23-21 mJN DATE 05/18/98 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI43540I PAGE . 82BATCH 507PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 38 SI-118-23 11 OOOA04185 SIXTH AVE N STEVEN R JACOBSON STEVEN R JACOBSON 4185 SIXTH AVE N LONG LAKE NN 55356 38 31-118-23 12 0009 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 04320 SIXTH AVE N F L DETERHAN ETAL FERDINAND L DETERHAN 4320 SIXTH AVE N LONG LAKE HN 55356 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 Sl-in-2S 12 0012 04225 SIXTH AVE N W A HUELLER 8 P 0 HUELLER WXLLXAH A > PEGGY A HUELLER BOX 3 LONO LAKE HN 55356 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER * NAHE/ADDR 38 31-118-23 12 0018 04380 SIXTH AVE N JAHES E CARPENTER JAHES E CARPENTER 4380 SIXTH AVE N LONO LAKE HN 55356 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER ■ NAHE/ADDR 38 31-118-23 IS 0003 04345 WATERTOWN RD DONALD K PEARSON I WIFE DONALD K PEARSON 4345 WATERTOWN ROAD HAPLE PUIN HN 553^9 • » 'V-38 31-118-23 IS 0013 PROP ADOr 04300 WATERTOWN RO OWNER NAME JAHES JAY JOHNSON I WIFE TAXPAYER\rt JAHES JAY JOHNSON NAHE/AOOiO 4300 WATERTOWN RD HAPLE PLAIN HN 55359 L• ^ ;» *'V. ; • •• *■ . I f • 38 31-118-23 12 000504285 SIXTH AVE N CHARLES E LARSON CHARLES E LARSON 4285 6TH AVE NO LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 31-118-23 12 0007 04260 SIXTH AVE N KATHARINE S COLGROVE KATHARINE S COLGROVE 4260 SIXTH AVE N LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 31-118-23 12 0010 04340 SIXTH AVE N C S WILLIAHS 8 E R WILLIAHS CRAIG 8 ELIZABETH WILLIAHS 4340 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 31-118-23 12 0011 04360 SIXTH AVE N DON FLIES JR .DONALD 8 NAWAL FLIES 4360 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 31-118-23 12 0013 04235 SIXTH AVE N W AND S WYATT WILLIAM D WYATT 4235 N 6TH AVE LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 31-118-23 12 0015 04220 SIXTH AVE N R 8 J HANNING JR ROBERT C 8 JULIE HANNING JR 4220 CTY RO NO 6 LONO LAKE HN 55356 38 31-118-23 12 0022 04300 SIXTH AVE N ROBERT 8 MARILYN GEHRHAN ROBERT S GEHRHAN 4300 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 31-118-23 IS 0002 00420 TURNHAH RO L E BERG 8 K H BERG LEONARD 8 KATHLEEN H BERG 420 TURNHAH RD HAPLE PLAIN HN 55359 T••H .4 tr;-; 38 31-118-23 13 0004 04295 WATERTOWN RD H K 8 H W FILLMORE MILAN 8 MICHELLE FILLMORE 4295 WATERTOWN RD MAPLE PLAIN »l 55359 38 31-118-23 IS 0012 • 04220 WATERTOWN RD R AND J WYATT ROBERT J WYATT 4220 WATERTOWN ROAD HAPLE PLAIN HN 55359 38 31-118-23 13 0015 04225 WATERTOWN RD JAHES R PADDON JAHES R PADDON 4225 WATERTOWN RD HAPLE PLAIN r«4 55359 38 31-118-23 14 0008 04100 WATERTOWN RD DEBORAH H SMOLL DEBORAH H SIIOLL 4100 WATERTOWN RO HAPLE PLAIN HN 55359 "J run date osaa/98 BATCH 507 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR 58 SI 118-23 29 0001 09480 WATERTOWN RD ' TON SWEEZO TIMOTHY M SWEEZO 4688 WATERTOWN RD MAPLE PUIN MN 55359 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR . ;• • • 31-118-23-21-0004 PENDING SUSAN K VAN MOORLEHEM SUSAN K VAN MOORLEHEM 4490 WATERTOWN RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 ET AL REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 83 TOTAL BATCH 507 00019 jc)ril'\S6b 450b VloiCi/fch 31-118-23-24-0010 PENDING KENNETH TURNHAM KENNETH TURNHAM 4490 WATERTOWN RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 V, > (crH\ % N I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPPESENTEO ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. . (p ^ DATE 5/BY • • • • f ^on monttm^ni foundt iron monvmrnf srf.«'tko¥/n oro aatumod . M. t i • • » t t / . • • • • *••• r * • * *. i • f* -*\ ir:.ri^M.w^y ,I Rioht^of'^'iy hn9\ I 91 Ccuniy R99J Ro 6 K ^ h •ar sn i5A«A ^ r*/* , ra/** ^*\ V ^ ^cnrd^J in >H4<* ffi ••* cff»2f ttwRcjifh^ Qp^^ of />r*»os^ ^ ^\^jr Laesou //>!# running HfVs^ of tijftf an^/^T flom £b// //V»^ West 38f40Ji£21£l'^ Z7S.40 (So%u%/<rj/ hno of fVof/| of NB '/o oPSrtfian J/, , TUBH, RZ3 WofSiU PM-y 1, A point /XJ2.90 fpt/ Soutk from Mtr/h tmO ond 309.CS Itfoi ASrxiProm-Sosi tint of Q. Wrsi yi of NEi^ of Soeiien 'if, T/t§ti, R23 Wof Sfh P.H. \ I . -............309,1V ............-H I y ••tr. 't ■f • A point JisM 309.65 foot Wxtt from Easi lino of IVosf of of NE *A. of decfion 3t '* * >. * j* •f*. • \ pm- . • • A B c Mi.ll TTxy. S\!S 70t) • /o L Xn %2'D s'O• ■ ' J>B \ •• • *• #•• «97'6 270 • • / . •• «■ • < m • •»• •m • • • - • • •• V * • •f • • r *■^ s» • •. • * - -• Sg^r/C SYWEM INVENTORY Address:'' .4300Watertbv^Rd. .V-sSTc^' ■••jir..; . . • » r •*V» • ■ - • 1 f-Jr'* ••'ik. '. '*?: . r- - • • S'* . • ^ * * .V,-. . • m Building T>'pe: resideni^' •f-Permit#;'- 5204 System jype: stand^d^&ench "vrpiF- SYSTEi^QOmiTIol^:^^ . . Conformty: '3 . Tiw^Conditioni^^S^^ pFcondlSom'11 PID; 31-118-23 13 0013 •■-^¥bRs/GPD‘4^“ ■■ • SystemlSiiit l/l'^'- .., .y • V*v •*-••: .s •• •"^i^mePot: m^m ■•■ SEPTICJANKS . . .. Material^’' precast concrete SetbacktoBldg: 7o1iSc? * ^ H v ;% * • ’; ‘ •=7 V Capacity: — I •« .-£5: iooo;iooo DRAINFJEID Length of Lines 360 Lines; ''4%: Treatment Area: llOO ’-^-'j .Ml-: -•-r* . ". *• ♦ * .r_v^v r Treiich Width: 3 Mi ^ 1^- ■ of Filter:'^‘Tock -KiPp^. t'^autilUr • 12.^ \ Perc Rate: g- 40 ..Limitatioi^;,? c'..' 9 Well-DF: : 148 •%• * ”^^***0 Tile Si^J 4 . .Under Tile SetbackDF-Bldg; 9(? ' Soil Type:. ,smdy clay loam WELL DATA ■7i7 Setbacks - Well-Tanks:.. j20 PumpType^ subm. Depth-• f. • yi •• *7 ’ ; «T» - . .'/.w '•Ca »:Vf.v* ■ - V. 140 S Report in File: y •* A V :"C • ■ I Diameten 4 . Method: drilled V .. r- INSPECTION RECOBb \ •m • >. • • 4‘i- . -r *5’^- ti{- • . / •• •. -• A'-:- '7 s. •% -r;. -^r. -.. • »a^# .» • DATE 8/8/78 ■ • 9/17/84 9/5/86 • • 9/6/90 * 5/20/91. • I • • PUMPOUT RECORD DESCRIPTION installation :*‘. no surfacing ',. ’. no surfacing - no surfacing-pump tank.<i no surfacing • • slight sutfa^g 5l2\l9lg. non-compl^'t-repair by 1^31/2007 #*• *j‘ 6/25/93 ’l; vV-* • ». *# • -1-» •. ’* • T*• • vt- ••r-v i .'Tit r.s\ COMPUANCE DATE GALLONS >A- c 8/30/85 1800 :v< • ‘4:i 9/17/87 1500# 10/1/90 2000 •.-4 •xi-.-y 10/28/94 2000 T%-•* . . V* ■*. • •-. •. • —»*• - • ••* »t9* y 4 -*t •; W;k /iC^. 1 ■ -vSi-'i: . •»«» j- •• v«' ’ iL** i .pU3?;r.‘ r** • * »v- • ,*r-55^C. r-lt^ .. •. % • vitCfirX - •• *7.1#’^“___. a _ •■«s' %*<a • -‘»*v - • j-r yr y . f; 'vv.,S£t m •..iSSiiV 5/18/95 • • ■■"m- ■vfe 2000'^?^ /.«;'«• ■t’v'LT*. • -Y.-?r • v:Vi' ■■ T-j^- ----------^-■ ■m “ •• - TX mt ■ • SI ' I A A a S c I B c b l/Jz ■■io'c 4® 7V 7'Q # • I • ^m0 SEPTIC SYSTEM .INVENTORY^ ’ Addr: 4285 Sixth Ave~. N. ’ PID: 31-118-23 12 0005 - — .Building Type: residence # BRs/GPD: 2t*:^ # Systems/xinits: ~i Permit No: none * Date of Permit:* .4^Installer: unknown •System Type: standard trench .. . Appliances:.. 1/1 • • r SYSTEM CONDITION .^Conformity: 3 •r. *Tahk Condition :1^*6 DF "condition: ‘ 11 V Failure Pot: medium.r..- ---4 SEPTIC TANKS Material: Setback to Bldg: .,#.. Capacity: DRAINFIELD Length of Lines: Treatment Area: •v * No. Lines: Trench Width: Type of Filter: 5 Tile Size: Under Tile: Perc Rate mn/in: Setback DF-Bldg: —DF Ht above WT: ? . ^ Soil Type: slity clay loam Limitations: water table WELL DATA Setbacks - Well-Tanks:• 60 . Well-DF: Report in File?: Pump Type: Depth: Diameter: Method: INSPECTION RECORD Date 12/2/82 no surfacing 8/15/86 no surfacing 9/17/90 no surfacing-pump tanks 8/12/91 DP location unknown-pump tanks Compliance 2 2 2 2 PUMPOUT RECORD Date gelloaa 4/11/83 1000 11/20/87 500 10/28/93 owner located system-deep trenches,not 8/20/96 non-conforming-repair by 12/31/2^06 2 3 . . • .-.t t r » • ..'•V* • .4 •4’ 0•• •; - -r • rr .! •*. v » • ^ y . A «% •I*- — ; --V.— TO: FROM: DATE: Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/Zoning Administrator July 16,1998 SUBJECT: #2382 Busse Construction, on behalf of Tim Otten, 425 Tumham Road Conditional Use-Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-1A One Family Rural Residential (5 acres) Application:Busse Construction is working on the County Road 6 project for Hennepin County. Due to the cut and fill process for the road work, Busse Construction needs to find locations near the project to haul excess dirt. Prope^ owners in the area have requested fill. Land alteration of this magmtude requires a conditional use permit. The proposed land alteration will be located in the rear yard behind the existing house and will be 220' x 180' in size and 3 ft. deep requiring 3 925 c . Die yards of fill. * ’ Pertinent Ordinances: • Section 10.03, Subd. 19 and 20 Findings: 1.piat the proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the Zomng Chapter and the purposes of the district in which the site is located and Compreheiisive Municipal Plan; The proposed location in the rear yard will level an existing •bowV in the property ovmer^s yard tl^t he wants to ise as yard Several small trees and brush in the renter of the fill area would be removed m82 Otten July 20. ms poge-J r 2.That the proposed location of the conditional use and the proposed condition under wmch It ould be operated or maintained would not be dehimental to the public health safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity The proposed location for the fill areas is away from the existing septic site. The existing system is noncompliant. Staff visually inspected the site and believes that there are alternate locations for septic sites,however, testing should be done to determine that the there is a viable alternate site before filling. 3.•niat the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zonmg Chapter. rac proposed location complies with the Zoning Code, subject to septic testing before filling, ne applicant is required to grade the areas according to the topographic exhibit submitted The areas shall be properly seeded and established to natural vegetation. Staff Recommendation Attachments A B C D E F Application Topofor fill area Plat map Property Owner ’s list Survey Septic Info U2382 Often July 20, 1998 page~2 J r • « Application it Date Received Amount Paid ^ a^*SQ -fcir A CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION ] vjLi/wUai^ Rottj -^1, 23ta, PROPERTY LOCATION ^ Site Address C O.'PType of Application to be Filed--------------------------------------^ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ^ 31^ —0^02 APPLICANT Name ------------^-------— Addre«;s /OS' £ (.U/ltvi |g«£. OWNER (if different than applicant) Name "T/ A/i O t Address fA__&J3__ Date Property Acquired V-~ 2.Q A A A # Phone fhome"! cQ*7 £fiV- Phone fworlcl CpfD r ^73 *(ip3*73 City _____Zip «S'«3 Phone fhomel V7d? V7 S“0 _ Phone (work)______;__________ Zip S’SSS^ (month/year) I ^^^do not) also FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - S 75.00 For each variance request with CUP application ~~ $175,00 Residential Accessory Use _____$250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) ______$225.00 Guest House/Gucst Apartments _____$200.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg ______$300.00 Commercial/Industrial Use X $250.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75* of lakeshore _____PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule ______$150.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee . OTHER APPLICATIONS _____$250.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) _____$300.00 Vacation _____$200.00 Easement Vacation $100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _____$350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) ______$350.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _____$100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. ____Completed Application Form. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. __Describe request in detail. • ' •' Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Government Center, 348-3271). ___Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout, for .Survey information. . ' ' ‘ ___Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. ___Topographic survey (existing'and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). J __List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in die property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). ■ ’Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). ___As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you vdsh notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR COPY FOR REPRODUCTION (11" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff: Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Date OWNER'S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for pulses of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date S'-/S'-98 Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Plaoning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. • « \ V. Exist. * House ^^4” PVC Cleonouls f .V • •• •“t3^ r / ... *• * CJ c / -i .•»;*•------i-i.-. V 1.-V. -r*i — i" " — JlTI — • V • ^^ • VJe^ll -n» h A •1 •/* * «» • '•wsr^ • • • .% t B • •ZIr\ f .t •r..* • .• •. .• u -'. *• • A • /I B •c t) . 1/»yw ; • 1• 1 Is sa'o ISD ft • • • • bE 3?'0 -: iJel • .• . . *• ?'6‘ ■ t * •• •• SD'9 • • * • • • ,.Li: •• • ::r’%-.. • ••* •?«*;*%'• •• • — -f SEPTIC SYSTEM IKrVEMTQRY Addr: 425 Tumham Rd.-PID: 31-^118-23 24 0003 -- Building.Type: residence - # BRs/GPD:-- 4 f:Systems/units: l/l Permit No: 3595 Date of Permit: -4/16/73 Installer: Widmer Bros. .. System Type: standard trench . Appliances: Indry r I 4• SYSTEM CONDITION Conformity: 3 TankTondition: “*r9r: DP condition: Failure Pot: medium j-rl- ^ •. r};- SEPTIC TANKS Material: concrete Setback to Bldg: 25 • I ■* X "’“Capacity: *1000, 700 *-r„i DRAINFIELD Length of Lines: No. Lines: Trench Width: Treatment Area: 900 Type of Filter: rockj:: Tile Size: 4 Under Tile: Perc Rate mn/in: Setback DF-Bldg: 20 DF Ht above WT: 0 Soil Type: silty clay loam Limitations: water table WELL DATA . Setbacks Well-Tanks: • 55 Well-DF: 75 Report in Pile?: y Pump Type: subm. Depth: 196 Diameter: 4 Method: drilled •. 4 i • INSPECTION RECORD Patfi 11/2/81 9/9/86 8/13/90 7/11/91 5/13/93 1Q/1/9S non-compliant-repair by 12/31/2006 no surfacing no surfacing . . no surfacing no surfacing-pump tanks no surfacing-risers added t . r Compliance 1 —* 1w1 1 1 3 PUMPOUT RECORD Date Gallons ... f ;. • “ V • • •r. ,1 • *♦ • * .*.*.■:' •• Ws. •r.* r* as *w r TO;Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM;Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/Zoning Administrator DATE;July 16,1998 SUBJECT'; (y3g>n KatHa^( ind #2387 Busse Construction, on behalf of le Colgrove, 4260 Sixth Avenue North Bob Gehrman, 4300 Sixth Avenue North .Conditional Use-Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-1A One Family Rural Residential (5 acres) Application;Busse Construction is working on the County Road 6 project for Hennepin County. Due to the cut and fill process for the road work, Busse Construction needs to find locations near the project to haul excess dirt. Property owners in the area have requested fill. Land alteration of this magnitude requires a conditional use permit. The proposed land alteration will be located in the northeast section of the Gehrman property and a portion of the rear yard of Colgrove's property. The land alteration will require 17,310 cubic yards of fill. Pertinent Ordinances: Section 10.03, Subd. 19 and 20 Findings: 1.That the proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Chapter and the purposes of the district in which the site is located and Comprehensive Municipal Plan; The proposed location in the rear yard will level an area that slopes from 299.5 m to 295 m from southwest to northeast in the northeast section of the Gehrman's property. There is a wetland in the vicinity. The applicant will need to stake along the wetland and stay at least 26' awayfrom the edge of the delineated wetland The proposed land alteration will cross m82 Otten July 20. 1998 page-1 a portion of Colgrove's property. 2. That the proposed location of the conditional use and the proposed condition under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. • • * . • • • The proposed location for the fill areas is away from existing septic sites, the existing systems are noncompliant. Staff visually inspected the site and believes that there are alternate locations for septic sites,however, testing should be done to determine that the there is a viable alternate site before filling. 3. That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Chapter. The proposed location complies with the Zoning Code, subject to septic testing before filling. The applicant is required to grade the areas according to the topographic exhibit submitted The areas shall be properly seeded and established with suitable ground cover or natural vegetation. Staff Recommendation To approve the conditional use permit to alter land on the Gehrman and Colgrove properties as submitted, subject to septic testing before hauling any fill and establishment of ground cover. Attachments ’f A B C D E Application Plat Map Property Owner's list Topo map Septic Info 92382 Otten July 20. 1998 page-2 r k Application H ^ 3 Date Received G>(i Amount Paid o -fry CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION • • • • PROPERTY LOCATION \ OM Site Address A ct ^ ______ Type of Application to be Filed dcnJiA'Jr-j^( Let.gL UType of Application to be Filed________________________, Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) lift ^3 1^ C)QQrl .COMSTgilcnDM Phone (home) T ....... Thone (work) . Sl%'Q3'7Ji liT • ■ Addre<;s I^QQI ‘fteiU^Q(n TrAtl■ City: BclK- PlOirt^ MM S&Ol | OWNER (if different than applicant) Pbone (home)-----^7- KW VnAdrltii. GoUr^____________ Phone (work)---------^^ ■ r*t 1—7 ^---------- zipAddress(fyiin City nrd^o Date Property Acquired________________________ I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. / FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - _____$ 75.00 For each variance request with CUP application _____SI75.00 Residential Accessory Use _____$250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) _____$225.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments _____$200.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg _____$300.00 Commercial/Industrial Use _____$250.00 Land Alteration ____ Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain ____ Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls vnthin 75' of lakeshore _____PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule _____$150.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee (month/year) OTHER APPLICATIONS _____$250.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) _____$300.00 Vacation _____$200.00 Easement Vacation _____$100.00 Easement Vacation "With Subdivision _____$350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) _____$350.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _____$100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. • • __Completed Application Form. j_Describe request in detail. _^ Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Government Center, 348-3271). __Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout, for .Suivey information. • __Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. __Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). __List 'of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). Cortstruction plan, , if applicable (see staff-for requirements). __As an addehduih to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. ••• YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR COPY FOR REPRODUCTION (11" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. . ■—Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff____________________ Date_______________________ APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and cowept to the^b^st of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Date OWNER'S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner’s signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. r RUN DATE 05/2S/98 BATCH SOS PROP ADOR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR I • PROP AOOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP AOOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP AOOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 S0-118-2S SO 0001 . 000S8 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED KIP A NELSON KIP NELSON 4580 WATERTOWN RD MAPLE PUIN HN 55359 SB S1*118-2S 12 0005 04285 SIXTH AVE N CHARLES E LARSON CHARLES E LARSON 4285 6TH AVE NO LONG LAKE HN 55556 58 31>118>23 12 0010 04340 SIXTH AVE N C S WILLIAMS 8 E R WILLIAMS CRAIG 8 ELIZABETH WILLIAMS 4340 6TH AVE N L»IG LAKE MN 55356 38 31-118-23 12 0013 04235 SIXTH AVE N W AND S WYATT WILLIAM D WYATT 4235 N 6TH AVE LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 31-118-23 12 0022 04300 SIXTH AVE N ROBERT 8 MARILYN CEHRHAN ROBERT S GEHRMAN 4300 6TH AVE N lONG LAKE HN 55356 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME ' TAXPAYER TOTAL BATCH NAHE/AODR 60S 00015 ' 38 30-118-23 43 0003 00835 HUNT. FARM RD ANTHONY W WALDERA ANTHONY W WALDERA 5313 HIGHPOINTE DR BLOOMINGTON MN 55437 38 31-118-23 12 0007 04260 SIXTH AVE N KATHARINE S COLGROVE KATHARINE S COLGROVE 4260 SIXTH AVE N ' LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 31-118-23 12 0011 04360 SIXTH AVE N D 8 N FLIES JR DONALD 8 NAHAL FLIES 4360 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 31-118-23 12 0015 04220 SIXTH AVE N R 8 J HANNING JR ROBERT C 8 JULIE HAWIIN6 JR >)220 CTY RD NO 6 LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 31-118-23 13 0013 04300 WATERTOWN RD JAMES JAY JOHNSON 8 WIFE JAMES JAY JOHNSON 4300 WATERTOWN RD MAPLE PLAIN HN 55359 38 31-118-23 21 0001 4490 WATERTOWN RD KENNETH TURNHAM ET AL SUSAN K VAN MOORLEHEM 4490 WATERTOWN RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE S. 38 30-118-23 44 0006 00885 HUNT FARM RD HUNTINGTON FARM HOME OWNERS LARRY MCCARTNEY • 755 HUNT FARM RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 • f 38 31-118-23 12 0009 04320 SIXTH AVE N F L DETERHAN ETAL FERDINAND L DETERHAN 4320 SIXTH AVE N LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 31-118-23 12 0012 04225 . SIXTH AVE N W A MUELLER 8 P 0 MUELLER WILLIAM A 8 PEGGY A MUELLER BOX 3 LONG LAKE HN 55356 ». 38 31-118-23 12 0018 04380 SIXTV AVE N JAMES E CARPENTER JAMES E CARPENTER 4380 SIXTH AVE N LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 31-118-23 24 0001 04480 WATERTOWN RD T 8 H SWEEZO TIMOTHY M SWEEZO 4480 WATERTOWN RD • MAPLE PLAIN HN 55359 -a riy\Z4Tt H300 Sliiu CoibEOue o RUN DATE 05/28/98 BATCH 585 *HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI^iSAOXPAGE» • • » * * r • •%• 9 • * 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF NY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF DATE* . V • • I I • • • • i I J •; *t ** I «0« • t • •• • . \ . f j • i ‘*‘|*^*" A E hJe,s'6 22^ • ^ • * * • • •• • •r.; ir.Tn 33D as'6 I2 Tn 3^0 2<?'6w^b'D '-W ? r •• t —SEPTIC SYSTEM INVEMTORV -li- .. t ■ — Addr: 4260 Sixth_Ave. N. Pipi:..31-118-203 0007 Building Typeresidence # BRs/GPD; \~~2r~ # Systems/imits: l/l ... SYSTEM CONDITION^'' ' ' Conformity: - 3~- Tank Condition: 9 '"DP-~conditidn:"-’ 11 Failure Pot: medium • • • SEPTIC TANKS • ^‘ ‘ Material: concrete block Setback to Bldg: 25 Capacity: 750 ~750 DRAINPIELD *-•- Length of Lines: 140 No. Lines: 2 Trench Width: 2 Treatment Area: ’ 280 Type of Filter:' Tile Size: Under Tile: Perc Rate mn/in:' Setback DF-Bldg: 40 DP Ht above WT: 0 Soil Type: clay loam Limitations: water table WELL DATA Setbacks - Well-Tanks: • Report in File?: Depth: Diameter: 65 Well-DF: 75 Pump Type: Method: INSPECTION RECORD Date 12/2/82 tanks not located 8/30/84 no surfacing 8/15/86 no surfacing 9/17/90 no surfacing-need risers,pump tanks 8/12/91 no surfacing-need risers,pump tanks 10/28/93 no surfacing-ist tank riser foundspump 8/20/96 non-conforming-repair by 12/31/2006 PUMPOUT RECORD Date Gallons « rr^.- : r 2 TO;Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator %■ FROM: Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/Zoning Administrator DATE; ( SUBJECT; July 16,1998 #2386 Busse Construction, on behalf of Katharine Colgrow, 4260 Sixth Avenue North Bob Gehrman, 4300 Sixth Avenue North Conditional Use-Public Hearing Zoning District; RR-IA One Family Rural Residential (5 acres) Application;Busse Construction is working on the County Road 6 project for Hennepin County. Due to the cut and fill process for the road work, Busse Construction needs to find locations near the project to haul excess dirt Property owners in the area have requested fill. Land alteration of this magnitude requires a conditional use permit. The proposed land alteration will be located in thie northeast section of the Gehrman property and a portion of the rear yard of Colgrove's property. The land alteration will require 17,310 cubic yards of fill. Pertinent Ordinances; • Section 10.03, Subd. 19 and 20 Findings; 1.That the proposed location of the conditional i}§e is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Chapter and the purposes of the district in which the site is locat^ and Comprehensive Municipal Plan; I * • • * • The proposed location in the rear yard will level an area that slopes from 299.5 m to 295 m from southwest to northeast in the northeast section of the Gehrman'sproperty. There is a wetland in the vicinity. The applicant will need to stake along the wetland and stay at least 26^ away from the .dge of the delineated wetland The proposed land alteration will cross U7382 Otten July 20.1998 page-J • • a portion of Colgrove ’s property. 2.That the proposed location of the conditional use and the proposed co>:aition under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, s^ety, or welf^e, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. • • • , • • The proposed location for the fill areas is away from existing septic sites. -The existing systems are noncompliant. Staff visually inspected the site and believes that there are alternate locations for septic sites,however, testing should be done to determine that the there is a viable alternate site before filling. 3. That the proposed conditional use will comply wi A each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Chapter. The proposed location complies with the Zoning Code, subject to septic testing beforefilling. The applicant is required to grade the areas according to the topographic exhibit submitted The areas shall be properly seeded and established with suitable groimd cover or natural vegetation. Staff Recommendation To approve the conditional use permit to alter land on the Gehrman and Colgrove properties as submitted, subject to septic testing before hauling any fill and establishment of ground cover. Attachments A B C D E Application Plat Map Property Owner’s list Topo map Septic Info U2382 Oden July 20,1998 page-2 r Application it ^3^7 Date Receiyed Amount Paid If a_____ CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ’• 4i>o A/ appliCAh^ Type of Application to be FUed fi ii> Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) -- Ufl-3La OQIQ APPLICANT , .Phone Oiome l V67-{3?.r ------1 »44xt iC r^va?,vl Cf>uSto 6.i>L./t7Phone(work ) Address _ J>3.Sjr e City Zip cT!>-o-7(. OWNER (ifjdiprent ^ applicant) Phone (home ) V XirPAAv _________ Phone»{work ) Q//^ y Address 6^J\J K[ Citv Zb 7?^ Date Property Acquired _ /9 7T^ V I V "7 (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - ______5 75.00 For each variance request with CUP application _____$175.00 Residential Accessory Use _____$250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) _____$225.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments _____$200.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg _____$300.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $250.00 Land Alteration ... Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75* of lakeshore _____PRD/PIU - see Fee Schedule _____$150.00 Renewal Fee (no change from oflginal application) • -_____Afler-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee • • OTHER APPLICATIONS _____$250.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) _____$300.00 Vacation _____$200.00 Easement Vacation - $100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision - $350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) _____$350.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _____$100.00 Appeals ______Other - see Fee Schedule r REQtnRED SUBMITTALS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Completed Application Form. Describe request in detail. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350’, labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Government Center, 348-3271). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout.for Survey, information. . •.' Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to tWs application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR COPY FOR REPRODUCTION (11» X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED, (Staff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff:_______ Date APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and^coifect to the be6t of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s signature Date 5 '■'iG •'Ijf ' OWNER'S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry optoullie property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council me/fibers forjpurposc^fl^estigation and verification of this request. / . Owner's signal Date / ^ Applicant must have all Submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting- Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to tiie meeting. N 1) n,^io o.N|.Fence SOo ^ ^ p2>0 -feet JO -P«+ \ '■ '. S'v . . .. N. -'« \ i » • *. ^ 297 ;/ 44-' '''' e*d ssse 289 S31VIOOSSV OilO I'load W2SMI 8661-92-9 9. Xrs DE 370 E qo /j 3S0 2ldS30 1 *#• .* 5 r ^EPTIC gVflTEM inventory • • Addr: 4300 Sixth" Ave. N. Building" Type: :re_sidence PID:" 31-118-23 .12 0008 n'te of InstSlert Widmer Bros.Permit No: none,-**: Date of Permit. fiances: Indry. • System Type: Standard trench . • •e .* • * • . • .• • . . • SYSTEM CONDITION p* -- ' Conform'ity: -•3-3“ Tank Condition: Failure Pot: medium \f: t 5 -DF..‘condition:^.:.' 11 . SEPTIC TANKS Material: concrete block Setback to Bldg: -■ 15 Capacity: 750/-500 .M*. ^SS^^Dines: / 195 No. Lines: S ': Trench Width: rif?5p“erfltrioa^“ "^'Limitations: water table WELL DATA ;. Setbacks - Well-Tanks: Report in File?: ‘ y Depth: 115 Diameter: Well-DF: Pump Type: subm. ‘ 4 Method: drilled INSPECTION RECORD Date . ,12/2/82 no surfacing-pump tanks 8/15/86 no surfacing - - 9/17/90 no surfacing 8/12/91 no surfacing 10/18/93 no surfacing ,oyQi/onns8/20/96 non-conforming-repair ..by 12/31/^006 rompliance 2 2 . 2 2 2 3 PUMPOUT RECORD Date SgllQBS 6/19/79 2000 5/1/87 1500 L, mm •* i*. . • ; i r- .* * « . "vr?• * ••mm^mm 35;•.tV* . ; . > • • t • • m • r.. ►-rl' . • :rx • J COUNCIL MSSTINQ JUL 2 7 1998 OTYOrORONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Assistant Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed: DATE: 7/27/98 ITEM NO.: Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:#2385 Stephanie Kroeger 3465 Crystal Place Variances Zoning Dbtrict: LR-1C One Family Rural Residential District Lot Area: 6,646 square feet (.15 acre) Application: The aoplicant has proposed to tear down an existing one stall garage with attached storage to consort a new two stall garage in the same location. The new gamge requires a v^ance fom and side yard setbacks, and a second variance from hardcover requirements within the 500 lakeshore distance. The existing garage is located directly on both the side and rear lot lines. The proposed garage would be located 3' from each lot line. Hardcover on the lot is 52.2%. This would be reduced to 48.6% if the application is approved and the garage constructed. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommended by a 6 to 0 vote to: 1. Approve the variance to permit a 3 foot rear yard setback and a 3 foot side yard setback. 2. Approve the variance to permit 48.6% hardcover in the 500' to 1000' lakeshore setback. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To approve or amend the enclosed resolution r A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.25, SUBDIVISION 6(B); SECTION 10.22 SUBDIVISION 2; AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L)(2) FILE NO. #2385 WHEREAS, Stephanie Kroeger (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the <*■“ •«" »■> - Lot 5, Block 2 Navarre Heights, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and w. . c. published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Coi^sion held a public hearmg on July 20. 1998. at which times all persons desiring to heard concemmg this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; a^ 7 • j WHEI^AS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municioal sSsbl?^16 Subdivision 6(B); Section 10.22, Subdivision 2; and Section 10.5^ ffr Xre a W con^ction of a detached garage requiring a side yard setback 01 3 where a 10 setback is required, a rear yard setback of 3’ where a 10' setback is reouired “iLed* ““ "here odj 35% Minnesota: 1. 2. NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2385. Lakeshore Residential Zoning Page 1 of 4 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 20, 1998 and recommended approval on a vote of 6 to 0 for the variances based upon the following findings: A. The existing garage is located directly on both the rear and side lot lines. B.The proposed detached garage would be located 3' from the rear and side lot lines. ► C. The property is served by a shared drive with the neighboring property. D. A lot coverage variance is not required for the subject lot. E. The total hardcover would be reduced from 52.2% to 48.6%. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6(B); Section 10.22, Page 2 of 4 Subdivision 2; and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L)(2) to permit construction of a detached garage requiring a side yard setback of 3' where a 10 feet is required, a rear yard setback of 3' where 10' is required, and to allow 48.6% hardcover within the 500-1000' lakeshore setback zone where only 35% hardcover is allowed. 1. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (July 27, 1999). 2. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 3. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of herself, her heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Counvil of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of July, 1998. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner (s) Page 3 of 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of July, 1998, Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of ^ 199 _before me a Notary Public within Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199 before me a Notary Public within Notary Public Page 4 of 4 r TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator July 9.1998 #2385 Stephanie Kroeger 3465 Crystal Place Variance —Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IC Lot Area:6,646 One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1/2 Acre) square feet (.15 acre) Application: The applicant has proposed to tear down an existing one stall garage with attached storage to construct a new two stall garage in the same location. The new garage requires a variance from rear and side yard setbacks, and a second variance from hardcover requirements within the 500 *o 1000' lakeshore distance. The existing garage is located directly on both the side and rear lot lines. The proposed garage would be located 3’ from each lot line. Hardcover on the lot is 52.2%. This would be reduced to 48.6% if the application is approved and the garage constructed. Pertinent Ordinances: • Section 10.25: LR-IC One Family Lakeshore Residential District • Section 10.22, Subd. 2: Lakeshore Hardcover Regulations • Section 10.56, Subd. 16(L)(2): Lakeshore Hardcover Regulations d2385 Stephanie Kroeger 3465 Cry stal Place Variances 7/20/98 Page I r ANALYSIS T ot Area and Yards LR-IC Lot Area Lot Width Rear Yard Side Yard Street Yard Required 21,780 s.f 100'30'10'30' Existing 6,648 s.f 50'O'O'32.3' (res.) Proposed 6,646 s.f 50'3'3'32.3' (res.) The existing garage is located on the rear and side yard lot lines. The proposed structure would be moved out slightly to 3 feet from the rear lot line and 3 feet from the side lot line. The subject lot does not meet lot area or width requirements. Structural Coverage Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage 6,646 s.f Existing: l,4v.^^ f Proposed: 1,466 s.f 21.1% 22.0% The lot exceeds the 15% structurai t maximum requirement. Although, the Zoning Code; in Section 10.03, Subd. 14(C): Lot C < ^rage; states: Regardless of lot area, every developed lot shall he allowed at least 1,500 square feet of lot coverage by principal residence and garage structures. A variance from structural coverage requirements is not necessary to exceed the 15% lot coverage standard on this particular lot. U23SS Stepha.’iie Kroeger 3465 Crystal Place Variances 7/20/98 Page! r Hardcover Distance from Shoreline 0'-75' 75'-250' 250’-500' 500'-1000' Total Area in Setback 6,646 s.f. Existing Hardcover 3,466 s.f. (52.2%) Allowed Hardcover none (0%) 0 (25%) 0 (30%) 2,326 s.f. (35%) Proposed Hardcover 3,232 s.f. (48.6%) Variance Requested none none none from 35% standard to allow 48.6% hardcover All of the subject lot is located in the 500' to 1000' lakeshore setback distance. The total amount of hardcover will be reduced, resulting in a net loss in hardcover of 3.6%. The new garage would consist of more square footage than the existing garage, but due to the garage's placement on the lot over a portion of the driveway and a concrete slab the overall hardcover does decrease from 52.2% to 48.6%. A variance from hardcover requirements within the 500' to 1000' lakeshore setback is necessary to construct the garage. ANALYSIS Variance STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP Applicant's hardship is included with Exhibit A. The applicant should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. 112385 Stephanie Kroeger 3465 Cry stal Place Varkmcts 7/20/98 Page 3 Criteria for Determining Undue Hardship 1. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The property can continue to be used in its current state. The new garage will not alter the use of the property. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The property sl^s a driveway with the neighboring lot. The only possible location for the garage to function with the shared drive is the same location as the existing garage. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. located around the subject lot generally have a detached garage located behmd the residence. The new garage will not change the appearance of the neighborhood or negatively impact neighboring residences. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of this chapter. Economic factors are not a consideration with this application. Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Solar access is not a consideration. 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance for a^ use that is not permitted under this Chapter for the property in the zone where the affected person’s land is located. The use of the property would remain residential with ? garage as a permitted use. The applicant only intends to construct a new garage on the lot 4. 5. M2385 Stephanie Kroeger 3465 Crystal Place VarUmces 7/20/98 Page 4 r 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. The applicant will not be changing the dwelling status of the property. The special conditions applying to the structure of land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The property was platted well before the current zoning regulations, resulting in the property not conforming with standards. The size of the lot has limited the applicant's options for placing the garage elsewhere on the lot. Also, the shared driveway cannot be moved to any other location without removing access to the neighbor's lot. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Many lots in the Navarre area are not served by shared driveways, but many do not meet setback requirements. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The applicant has an existing garage located in the same location as the proposed garage will be located. The applicant has indicated the garage on the lot is nearing disrepair and should be replaced. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. The granting of the variances will not constitute a public hazard. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. The granting of variances will not create something new for the lot. The applicant has a legal, non-conforming structure on the lot serving the property as the proposed garage would. The variances are not a convenience due to the conditions already existing on the property. The setbacks would become 3 feet, whereas, the current structure is on the property line, and overall hardcover would be reduced from 52.2% to 48.6%. 02383 Stephanie Kroeger 3465 Crystal Place Variances 7/20/98 Page 5 Issues 1.The lot would increase in structural coverage from 21.1% to 22.0%. Although, a variance IS not required if the total structural coverage is 1,500 square feet or less. The total lot coverage >vould be 1,466 square feet. 2.The existing gai^e is located directly on both the rear and side lot lines. The new garaci would be setback 3 feet from the rear lot line and 3 feet from the side lot line. 3. 4. The property is served by a shared drive with the neighboring property. ^ lot is located vvitto the 500’ to 1000’ lakeshore setback. The lot is aUowed a total of 35/0 l^dcover (2,326.1 square feet). The existing hardcover is 3,466 (52.2%) square feet, but the proposed changes would reduce the hardcover somewhat to 3,232 (48.6%) STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the variances from rear yard setback and side yard setback ^^^gar^^e ^ ^ setback for the construction of a garage to be replace the variance from hardcover requirements within the 500' to 1000 lakeshore setback based on the excessive hardcover on the property. Attachments A B C D E F G I. J. Application and Statement of Hardship Plat Map Location Map Topographic Map Survey Hardcover Calculations Photo of Existing Garage New Garage Plan Property Owners List Permit Record M2385 Stephanie Kroeger 3465 Crystal Place Variances 7/20/98 Fag^6 EXHIBIT A Application U Date Received (c ' 5- Amount Paid CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION . Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non>confonning structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address 3^(gS PlgLCg Orof\o ^ Mo Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) \T~in -A3- ‘4'^ noOff_____ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired ____________________________(month/year] I (do) Q^ppalso own the Idjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: V residential ___pother (specify)___________________ 2Coning District: _______________ APPLICANT Name ATgPHAN3iig KftQ&Gei^ Address:fcg PtAf Phone (home) \ -03 3 *7 _____ Phone (woric) City: \Aia\j^^jOjrtk Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name________ Phone (home). Phone (work)_ Address:City:.Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ \ OOP____ Describe request in detail: •TeA.ir rtoriarx CAfnat. /Lrvdt ir#pr/»r^> toifW 6. neto 6n^ ^ ^A (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED ___Lot Area ___Lot Width ___Hardcover Lot Coverage Setback:Front ^Side Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: LtA' no pi a 4r> QA-my. tohgjr Xhc (ocaJtt^cf (attach additional sheets if necessary) 50 50 1 ^ 1 cn• 00S S (140)CD y. 50 50 J Cj J • N/ 23 C3 : )(42)ro y- 1 50 50 STON I o • T O ) J1 23 5 oi 1 oi (43) 50 OJ 24 c;, (58) (59) >c 1 50 1 50 I /I—ir>29. MVQ - CO 12.3 50 y.. 50 50 50 _ Cv 50_ OJ 50 Cvi 50 50 _ OJ fv 50_ OJ 50_ OJ fv 50 tn •F t 50 r; 43.2 ^14 • cn 13 (70) '~y 1 2 cj 4 in cn ?2 11^ (69) loj (68) Q •^ cn 8 ( 141) -■y 7cn (65) • 6 (64) • 5«-’i (63) 4^ (62) 3I \ 1 1 ~y 1 y 52 J :i54) * V •I ~y 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 $0 50 y^ 45. ^ o3 o3 • • cn,5cn 134. 5CO17ln OJ 18^195 o 20*^ b 2>se Xk 22^ CaX^ 23^ o. X^ 24 if 25^ Ca X^ 26^ CO Xk. 27^28 (71)(72)(73)(74)• cn (75)x^• cn (76)(77)(78) X^• cn (79) (80) (8l| 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 y-- 50 50 50 47.48 50 AVE 10ro (Q2y 50 50. J1 50r;50 r,50- » .1 50 50 50__50^_50 “ “X 50 50 50 48. Mi EXHIBIT C C. GAANOVIE wIaV .1 » Lake 20C North % Skogsberg Point woo® CHE RRr Arm Maxwell [BOHNS fOINT West ORONO Arm Crystal Bohns Point Shad]ood Point DEERING ISLAND Pager ness Point 2401 4*125^LgRR_REW~4Vg U AVE 0 RO ?K Li rtHERHi!!!. Si ^^SjcowiyI .wllu . -RdI now IflM Black Lake -1-SHANNON U MTERLACHEN rI Spring Park AN RD, V P^an Point VB <110 GOOSE ISLAND CRYSTA L Lm NGSTON SHORELINE LYRIC |}g AVE SDR FRE DRICK ST .2400 LYOIARD^ CIR iv CO Carman (5?/» Aip^-o ^\zmj kjjv Bay PRONO SPRAY Ca^co ............................ i I r^ / 1 A I ^rs«i */^ m ^ ^ m # • \ > /o / /! I / * X / /%# / > l^ / M f /'V'^i 8 ® 1e \| I ^ 4i u SENT BY:;UMIC/MMIHC 9. ,67 1999 996 ad. y* view of f "o" is lat I am Mota. : 7- 8-98 ; ..2:36PM j MMIC 612/922-7323-61247305l0:ii 2/ C .-wCiW I I • uu# CJH EXHIBIT E BURUNGTON NORmFRJV JU/ZROAB CBF^A jTPZACM SCAi.C-.1"-20* S 09’59‘OO“ W ^CDQ6 o*" WT. I O JOB NO. 9S0505 r EXHIBIT G Existing Garage / ir . , ^ ;.-^^ •. -/';:.r. ■ ,v>\ -• *, .. J.'!’ •.—;r^. .*,::» . .rA ^ j !•'»• * .\l^ . ;!TW- /.\’^. ' ■ ' t.-"’ ' • t. '3'v k\v -^K ■Pfei i-- * •' '^‘ ^•J • c^ . .iw ■* / 4m » WHitfmumm B8KSBS 88BSa ■imiMi 8388 a 5^^88888 808888888188— MW^:Si 11 1 I •1^4' *11 iL^ 1i h 1^11 I >• ^.11 I, ll; • 11 I N •i'4' t:« !■ ji EXHIBIT J Permit No. 5;COUNCIL MEETINQ JUL 2 7 1998 ClTYOrORQMO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Department Approval: Name Liz Van Zomeren Title City Planner DATE: July 22, 1998 ITEM NO.: / 3 Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: i #2390 David Rahn 1385 Rest Point Road Variance-Direction to Staff re: Resolution Zomng District: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre) Lot Area: Application: 14,663 sq. ft. (.33 acres)____________ The applicant is requesting a hardcover variance in the 75'-250' setback to construct a 672 sq. ft. garage with a retaining wall and driveway with a turnaround. The appli^t received variances in 1997 for side yard setback, hardcover in the 0 -75 setback, and lakeshore setback to allow the cabin to be built mto a year round residence. A conditional use permit was also granted to allow land alteration because part of the lot is located below the floodplain elevation. In granting the multiple variances and conditional use permit, the City Council stated in tlje resolution that the amount of hardcover in Ae O'-75' setback would be subtracted from the 25% allowance in the 75'-250' setback. The amount of hardcover in the 0'-75' setback is 1,320.75 sq. ft. The allowed amount in the 75'-250' setback is 1,978.25 sq. ft. The amount of new hardcover allowed in the 75 '-250' setback is 8.3 % or 657.5 sq. ft. This amount is less than the proposed garage and driveway. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommended on a 6-0 vote to deny the requested COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To direct staff regarding preparation of a resolution. variance. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/Zoning Administrator July 13,1998 #2390 David Rahn 1385 Rest Point Road Variance-Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IB Lot Area: One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre) 14,663 sq. ft. (.33 acres) Application:The applicant is requesting a hardcover variance in the 75'-250' setback to construct a double garage, retaining wall, and driveway. The applicant (Sm Rk® The following variances were granted in 1997: 1. 2. Side yard variance to allow a second story addition 5.3' from the south property line where 5.3' was existing and 10' is required. A hardcover variance in the 0'-75' setback of 19% where none is allowed. The amount of hardcover allowed in the 0'-75' setback is to be subtracted out from the total amount allowed in the 75'-250' setback. 3. A lakeshore setback variance to allow the cabin to be remodeled in place where the cabin encroached into the required 75' setback. A conditional use perniit was granted to allow for land alteration in the 0'-75' setback. A portion of the lot is located below the flood plain elevation. Pertinent Ordinances: Section 10.24.5(B) LR-IB, One Family Lakeshore Residential District #2390 David Rahn 1385 Rest Point Road July 20, 1998 page-1 Section 10.22 Subd. 1 and 2 Section 10.56,16, (L) 1. and 2. Section 10.03, Subd. 9, D. Lot Area and Yards LR-IB District Standards ANALYSIS Lot Area 1 acre Lot Width 140' Street Yard 30’ Side Yard 10 ’ Lakeside Yard 75’ and ALS Subject Property Lot Area and Yards Lot Area 14,663 sq. ft. (.33 acres) Lot Width 89.86 ’ Street Yard 18 ’ to new garage Side Yard 5.3' on south Lakesidt* 33' Variances were granted 1^ year for side yard setback and lakeshore setback. The proposed garage as doors that face the side yard. On a lakeshore lot, a detached garage may be 10' from street property line. Structural Coveragf^ Total Lot Size 14,663 sq. ft. Total Structural Coverage Allowed 2,199.45 sq. ft. (15%) Percentage House & Decks=1,320.75 Garage=672 Total= 1,992.75 sq. ft. (13.5%) The proposed garage complies with structural coverage limits. #2390 David Rahn 1385 Rest Point Road July 20, 1998 page-2 Hardcover Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Existing Hardcover Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Variance Requested 0'-75'6,750 sq. ft 1,320.75 (19%) None 1,320.75 sq. ft.(19%) Granted in 1997 75'-250’7,913 sq. ft.792. sq. ft. (10%) 1,978.25 sq. ft. (25%) 2,104 sq. ft. (26.5)% 1,312 sq. ft, (1.5%) The above hardcover table is calculated for each setback, as staff normally does for hardcover variances In the City Council resolution, however, approving the conditional use permit and variances, the Council directed the applicant that future hardcover would be limited to the amount of hardcover in The table below shows the allowed hardcover based on the direction provided in Resolution #3926. Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Existing Hardcover Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Variance Requested 0’-75'6,750 sq. ft 1,320.75 (19%) None 1,320.75 sq. ft.(19%) Granted in 1997 75'-250’7,913 sq. ft.792. sq. ft.* (10%) 1,978.25(25%) -1.320.75 3,797 sq. ft. (47.98%) 657.5 -3,797 657.5 sq. ft. (8.3%) 3,139.5 sq. ft. (39.67%) The applicant is indicating that there is 792 sq. ft. of existing hardcover consisting of a shed, rock driveway, and play fort. When staff calculated the hardcover in 1997 for the other variances, only the shed was counted at approximately 100 sq. ft. The play fort and driveway were not identified on previous worksheets. The existing hardcover at 10% exceeds the amount allowed by resolution. #2390 David Rahn 1385 Rest Point Road July 20, 1998 page-3 The applicant is asking to add the following: 24' X 28' Garage Driveway 4' X 70' sidewalk Total amount of new hardcover: 672 sq. ft. 1,152 sq. ft. 280 sq. ft. 2,104 sq. ft. (26.5%) The amount of hardcover proposed in the 75'-250' setback exceeds the 25% limit by 1.5% or 125.75 sq. ft. The City Council directed that the hardcover in the 0'-75' setback (1,320.75 sq. ft.) be subtracted from the allowed hardcover in the 75'-250' setback. Therefore, the applicant is asking for 3,797 sq. ft. total hai«cover on the site which is measured against the 7,913 sq. ft. of lot area in the 75'-250' setback which represents 47.98%. This is contrary to the City Council's directive. STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP The applicant has indicated that they currently do not have any storage for vehicles and no basement. Criteria for Determining Undue Hardship 1. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The property can continue to be used without a garage. However, the previous seasonal cabin has been changed into a year round residence. It may be considered a hardship to not have a garage on the property, however, the applicant was instructed that ^ture hardcover would be limited. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The situation is created by the existing amount of hardcover that was built into the 0'-75' setback area which is credited against the 75'-250 ’ setback. The applicant chose to not build the house and garage at the same time. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. #2390 David Rahn 1385 Rest Point Road July 20, 1998 page-4 4. 5. 6. The variance will increase the amount of hardcover on the lot. Most of the properties in the area have garages. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The zoning lots in this area do not meet lot width and lot area standards. All of the lots are sub’ect to the same hardcover limits but most were constructed before the existing requirements. The subject lot also has a portion of the lot located in a floodplain, however, this does not impact the siting of the garage. The conditions do notapply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. The other lots in the area are subject to the same conditions, however, the amount of hardcover on this lot is subject to the conditions of the previous resolution. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The applicant will need to provide testimony that he has a substantial interest in having a garage. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. The garage will provide enclosed vehicle storage and storage for household goods that would otherwise be stored in a basement. The lot does not meet lot width or lot area requirements. 2. Previous variances were granted for side yard setback, lakeshore setback, and hardcover in the 0'-75' setback. 3. 4. A conditional use permit was previously granted to construct a portion of the house in the floodplain. The amount of hardcover allowed in the 75'-250* setback is to be reduced per resolution by the amount of hardcover allowed in the 0'-75'. The amount of hardcover requested for #2390 David Rahn I38S Rest Point Road July 20, 1998 page-5 the new sidewalk, 24' x 28' garage, and driveway exceeds the City Council's directive. 5.The proposed hardcover amount includes a play fort and a shed. This increases the amount of hardcover by 132 sq. ft. 6.The Zoning Code allows that a detached garage may be located 1 O' from the property line on a lakeshore lot. The amount of hardcover could be reduced if the garage was reduced in size and located closer to the street. STAFF RECOMMENDATION To discuss the issues, review the previous resolution, and direct applicant regarding the size and location of the garage to meet the City Council's limit of657 sq. ft. of new hardcover in the 75'-250' setback. A 20' x 20' garage would be 400 sq. ft. which would leave only 257 sq. ft. for driveway and sidewalk. Attachmects A B C D E F G H 1 J K L Application Location Map Plat Map Applicant's Sketch Topographical Map Survey Hardcover worksheets Garage Sketch Minutes Resolution Permit Record Property Owner's list #2390 David Rahn 1385 Rest Point Road July 20, 1998 page-6 J r i 1 Application # 5^6 Date Recei?ed~L' Amount Paid CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50,00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION ^ , Site Address /^/kT! ^OAcJ___________ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 1 / 8 s' f 8 Attach legal description to ajmlication if not included on required survey. Date Pi^rty^quired_ S"/z3/*?7 ____________________(month/year) I (do)^^b noO ^so own the adjacent parcels of land. PresentusTofproperty: residential ___pother (specify) Zoning District: ^ i 7?_______ ________ APPLICANT Name J^a A^ Address:_^^^<:" jc^. Phone (home) Phone (work) O C j OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Address: Phone (home) Phone (work)_ zip:s:3r^ City:Zip:_ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: Ruilcj/ 'ISjJJ /yt (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED ___Lot Area ___Lot Width Setback:Front Side .^^Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements:^ rrg. /^O_____ (attach additional sheets if necessary) X i^::T X 4. 5. 6. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS Ail of th? follft^ing information must be submitted bv the aPDlication deadline Hn»i. in Oldgr for VQur applicaHon to be considered complete; Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-3271). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8Y2" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8/2" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy V/i" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date 7. 8- ^Ja OWNER'S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date ^/^7/^? Applicant must have ail submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized aji nt attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to tiie meeting. 8 ..4> O ITbiKVf Qcnrf 9.0 ? 1 t21*^S (uo iV-'* i «obir) • (UU) S3 4^ ~l > «vy>/ i> •US.I) ^Llft 10' s<:H3ack:*ft>r dehiche^j ^oLro0<x . DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES:Lot 23. end aB that port of Lots 15 end 22. ond adjacent vacated alley, Subdivision of Lot 14, Rost Point Pork, Loke Minnetonka, lying Southerly of the following-described line: Beginning at a point on the Southeosterly line of said Lot 15. distonl 75 feel Northeosterly from the Southeast erly corner of sold Lot 23; thence Northwesterly to the Southeasterly corner of said Lot 22; thence Northwesterly on 0 line forming an ongle of 74 degrees 55 minutes with the Eosterly line of said Lot 22, to the shore of Lake Minnetonka, otkI there ending. jrvey intends to show the boundaries of the obove ed property, and the location of on existing house ed thereon. It does not purport to show ony other 2ments or encroachments. N. HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) 75-250’ 250-500*500-1000* EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House JLSl B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. -Pito/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Other . Width S.F. S.F. 3/5" S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPER IT AREA IN ZONE _____ - B X 100 = S.F. S.F.ja — PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House _____________ X Length % S.F. Width B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Other S.F. S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE + B t X 100 » > ’? HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’ EXISTIl^g HARPCQVERIN ZQIiE^ . A. House AM Length Shti/B. JaVegr C. Driveway-I'Z^. D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck _ F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic rti I f f rot H ■) t) 0 0 > Wij] O^VT^KHlIll isItliC^tl :4fci II tv^^: I ii 11 UMlillU tlMt ^T¥f;liW^ Wii lit ■ Fn lit) i^Vr^ 11* •MM tlCMIlf] t5i\Ct ««il^nUt ri I r^iItTi iTtriTO • i • W WiTi lilBTfilBP liT^MtJ •)<«)• WTTt ■ J iRl • i rtitrtMCcBfii tiiifitM«r«Tti f:lili«cf:UtB<fl iilfltlCHil !■ I •wm'MiT'-! • I ^•rtniTijiire IrB!•■•1P.1 [til lit •liuti ^ I JT^i?iRTnwt »iir« li M [•BMP-Iinf-Hflii •Tijmirt •Ttiri rnT*:»:TC^:l 1 r*J:HTOiM%p.U¥t vmJtlTES OF THE OROHO PLANNING COMMISSION iSwGHELD ON JUNE 16,1997 (#9 - #2248 David and Jodi Rahn - Continued) McMillan asked if the applicant had future plans for a garage. Rahn said he has no plans currently. He noted he built a garage on his present property after living there for a while to get a good sense of the layout and appropriate location for the garage. He indicated the future garage would be outside the 0-75* setback near the street He said he understood he heeded a 35* setback. He does not intend to have an attached garage. McMillan noted the currently driveway to be about one car’s length. Rahn said he would locate the garage and dnveway further uphill and close to the 35* setback. Lindquist inquired about having a bathroom located in the flood plain. The applicant said he was not fdtering cnything in the Good plain. McMillan inquired about the side yard setback. Rahn said the structure would be located 5.3' on the closest comer. Van Zomeren said the construction on the other side does not increase that »de setback. . Smith was informed that the applicant plans on residing in this residence. She asked if he had conadered a two-story design rather than expanding out. Rahn said his neighbor expressed concern with a two-story design. The proposed design is one story with a steep pitched roof. Smith said she had a problem supporting a plan with doubling hardcover in the 0-75* and asked for less impact in tins setback. Rahn said the current house is 600 s.f. and the proposed is at a minimum at 1,300 gross floor area. He noted the residence next door is at a 29% coverage and was built in 1983 which has the same standar ds as currently easts. He noted a lot line rearrangement in 1961 deemed the property buildable. There were no public comments at this time. Lindquist noted that buildable properties are allowed 15% structural coverage and the proposal is at 1328 s.f. Concern was voiced wth the ^cture location in the 0-75' but Lindquist noted there is no other location in wWch the structure can be located. Lindquist moved, Schroeder seconded, to approve Application #2248 for a conditional use permit for land alteration for setback in the flood plain, hardcover at 19%, lakeshore setback as existing, and »de setback if necessary. Schroeder inquired if a side yard setback is required even though no changes are made due to the original variance required for the property. If necessary, a side yard setback variance would be included in the above motion. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. . . MINUTES OF THEKEGULARORONO Cmr COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 23,1997(#10) #2247 WAYNE HOLMES, 1390 PARK DRIVE - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 3919 Gafifron reported tliat the application is a request for nde setback and »de street yard setback variances for construction of a detached accessory storage building. The building as initially proposed woiild be located 2.5* firom the .unimproved dedicated right-of-way known as Forest Avenue. The ri^t-of-way is wooded and low land. It is a potential access for Highwood Park. Staff and Flamung Comnusaon agreed that the 2.5' setback was inadequate. GafiEiron said the ^hcant has agreed to maint^ a 10* setback by angling the building and removing 2' from one side. This would allow the large oak tree to be saved but nngbt result in the loss of IDac bushes. Gaffron said the iO* setback is typical of normal setbacks. There is a IS* setback reqmrement for buildings of tlus size, but he feels a S' variance'is iqipropriate in order not to impact the tree. Additional grading or retminz^ wall would be required to eliminate any inq)act The applicant has proposed building a retaining wall. GaiBBron said the Planning Commisaon and Staff recommend approval of the amended plaiL . Goetten asked how far the building would be from the o^ tree. Mrs. Holmes said th^ have reduced the building by 2' to increase tiie separation. Gaffron indicated that the tree would be 10-12* from the building. Jabbour asked if there was ai^ reason to maintain the 60* right-of-way. Gaffron said there are no plans to improve the road, but it could be a potential park access in the future. Goetten asked that the app*' cants be considerate of the tree. Mr. Holmes said they vtiU work around the root system. Mrs. Holmes noted that the building is a pole bam and would be constructed on a floating ^ab. This should elinunate any problem for the oak tree. The applicant voiced satisfaction 'Mth the resolution bs presented. IFlint moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 3919. Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 0. * . * • * • ♦ * • (#11) #2248 DAVID AND JODI RAHN, 1385 REST POINT ROAD - VARIANCE Mr. Rahn was present . : . MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MELD ON JUNE 23,1997 Van Zomeren reported that the .3 acre property is located in the LR-IB Zoning Distnct. The proposal is to add structure to an existing cabin located whhin the 0-75* setback. The second stoiy would require a variance to the side yard ^back which^s^ and is lakeshore setback is not an issue as the structure is located behind that line. A conditional use permit is required for land aheration in the 0-75* setback. Van Zomeren reviewed the topography of the property. The 932’ devadon line "wanders” on the property. The existkte, structure is located at the high point of the property. 1 he flood plain is located behind U‘.e structure requiring a CUP for any alteration. The proposal is to square ofif the structure which encroaches the 0-75* setback. Ine hardcover in that setback would increase from 9% to 19%. Van Zomeren indicated the Planning Commisaon recommended approval of the side setback and hardcover vanan^ noting that improvements are limited to an area behind the existing lakeside setback and an additional half-story. They also recommended approval of the CUP for land alteration. Goetten asked the applicant if he had considered mo\nng the addition to the rear of the structure in order to get out of the 0-75* setback. Rahn said he met with the Watershed District. He said his design was an attempt to gain a favorable response from the CouncU. He indicated that moving the structure back would result in building in the 931.5’ elevation which is the flood pl^n. The plan as presented would not require mitigation of the flood plain as the additions would bmlt on posts. Rahn said the plan is an attempt to restore the existing structure. Rethought the Council would be less receptive to a plan involving aheration of the flood plain. Goetten said her concern is with doubling the hardcover in the 0-75* setback with any new construction if there are other alternatives to consder. Rahn indicated that only one-third of the new hardcover is Hv^le space; the remainder is decking. He said he tried to keep the structure compact and only squared the structure off. The screen porch and decking is only 8* wide. Goetten asked if Rahn discussed adding to the rear of the structoe with the WaterAed. Rahn said he did. He met with Tim Hafiier of the Watershed District He said this recommendation is possible but would occur in the lower area of the lot and reynre major alteration of the flood plain. Rahn said the home is located similarly on the lot with other homes in the nei^borhood and is the only ummproved site. r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 23,1997 (#11 - #2248 David and Jodi Rahn - Continued) Rahn said the only other option is to place the structure in the middle of the flood plain winch would require mitigation. He reiterated that no mitigation would be required in squaring off the structure. Jabbour asked the Council for thw opinion, Goetten said she would not approve additional hardcover in the 0-75' setback. Jabbour noted the applicant had suggested elimination of the decks which would decrease the hardcover from 1320 s.f. to 1018 s.f. Rahn said he has sold his other home and his family plans on liwng here year around. He also indicated that he will be planning on adding a garage in the future. • • Jabbour and Goetten both informed Rahn that structure in the flood plain is less of an issue than structure in the 0-75* setback. Rahn said his dream is to restore the cabin and suggested etiminating the deck and maintaining the screen porch as planned. Goetten was informed that the 8'x 12' is to be located on the north side of the structure. Jabbour said there is 60 s.f. of existing deck and 252 s.f total of decking. Eliminating this decking and maintaining tlie screen porch would result in 1068 s.f. of structure. The structure would be increased from 540 s.f. to 840 s.£ with a 132 s.f porch. Jabbour indicated that he is only considering this option because the structure is minimal in size noting 1500 s.f. is iK>rm^y allowed. The option would also maintain the structure out of the flood plain and would be serweed with sewer. Jabbour said this situation creates a true hardship. Jabbour moved to approve Application #2248 based on the hardships and reasoning as ^aled with the remo^ of decks as proposed by the applicant in order to &cilitate the application. The motion failed due to lack of a second. • • Goetten said she could not vote in favor of the motion and noted that the application .could be heard in front of a full Council. Rahn indicated that the guidelines have not changed since 1983 when the adjacent property was permitted 29% hardcover. Jabbour said he recognized the City made a mistake at that time. Rahn indicated that time is of the essence in prowding a home for his family. Goetten said she would be willing to table the application to the meeting of July 14. Goetten moved, Flint seconded, to table Application #2248. Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 0. 15 9 ' L MINUTES OF THE REGUIAR ORONO CTTY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 14,1997 (#4 - #2246 Donald Currier, Jr. - Continued) Currier informed Flint that the antenna could not be nested or raised in the location required due to the trees. He noted the survey shows the trees plotted that are affected 1^ the antenna and the tree cover then drawn in. Jabbour noted that the ability to have a nested antenna is more visibly attractive than an antenna that must be fiilly extended at all times. Currier said trees would still have to be removed to allow for the fiilly extended antennal Jabbour was informed that the naghbor in whose yard the antenna would fall, if h would topple, gave his approval. Flint questioned why the antenna cannot be moved 15' further along the s^e line noting the surv^ does not indicate trees in that area. Cumer smd the tree cover is located there and would result in the loss of a lotus tree. Jabbour was informed that the horizontal width is a 34’ majdmum with a 20* long boom. Flint was told that the antenna is directional motorized by a rotor. In answer to the question of how dose the ndghboi’s structures are to the north property line, Moorse said a letter indicates that the area is ungroomed without any structures. Kell^ questioned what would ha|^}en if that property owner wanted to build a garage in that location. Currier said the neij^bor told him he could put the antenna on the property line if he wanted to. Goetten reported that if the neighboring property was sold, the antenna could create problems for the new owner. Kdl^ suggested a call option be placed on the antenna if that were to occur. Barrett indicated that this would be difBcuH to enforce. Peterson was informed that there were a couple other antennas in the City and no problems have been reported. The only other retractable antenna that was on a property in the City was remov^ when the resident moved. Jabbour said he feds the retractable antenna is a great idea. Currier indicated he would like to maintain the trees to lessen the visual impact. Jabbour moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Resolution No. 3925 per the Planning Commission recommendation. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 1, Flint. (#5) #224S DAVID AND JODI RAHN, 1385 REST POINT ROAD - VARIANCE RESOLUTION NO. 3926 David Rahn was present. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL meeting held ON JULY 14,1997 (#5 - #2248 David and Jodi Rahn - Continued) Kelley asked for clarification on the hardcover calculations of an incrcMe fi-om 9% to 19% in the 0-75' setback. He was informed that the calculations do not include a driveway or potential garage. There is currently no hardcover in the 75-250’ setback and the hardcover noted is the house foo^rint only. Kelley said a driveway and garage we inevitable and would need to know the calculations for them and what amount w(^d be added in the 0-75' where h leads to the home. Jabbour noted that the application is entitled to 25% in the 75-250' setback. KcU^ questioned what percentage would be in the flood plain. Rahn said the garage would not be below the 931.5’ elevation and no variance would be required for a garage. Van Zomeren agreed that no variance would be required. Kdley said he has never turned down an application for a two-car garage noting the necessity for garages in this area but felt the calculations should be included. He questioned a adewalk leading to the residence. Peterson questioned the need for the calculation tince it is not included in the proposaL Rahn indicated that he is allowed 1500 s.£ of structure outside the 0-75’ and as much as 2200 si*, with the size of the lot. Jabbour asked the applicant how he plans on walking to the houM. The applicant questioned whether a walkway is required. Rahn said he has no intention of putting in a sidewalk. Jabbour indicated that one would eventually be needed. Rahn said he uses the grass area now and the deckmg and entry are metuded in the calculations. He current^ parks on the clearing on top of the hillside and there is no established drivev^ray. Goetten questioned wty the retidence cannot be pulled back. Rahn said the residence would then be located in the flood plain. He said he has space for 1900 s.f. in the 75-25(y • setback. Kelley asked Staff if 25% hardcover allowed for the 75-250' setb^k includes land in the flood plain. He was informed by Gaffiron and Van Zomeren that it did. Jabbour noted the structure could be a slab on grade wthout a foundation. Jabbour said he would make his approval contingent on no additional variances allowed in the future and any further improvements adhering to standards in the zoning code. Gaffion questioned with hardcover shown in the 0-75’, whethw tins amount should be subtracted from that allowed elsewhere. He felt it should be. Jabbour cited an example where this has been done in the past. Gaffiron indicated that with 2000 s.f. total allowed, h would leave 1000 s.f. for any future improvements. Jabbour said that was a good idea. Rahn agreed to comply with tins request. (#5 - #2248 David and Jodi Rahn - Continued) labbour movtd. Peletson seconded, to ^tw^backand the h^gejddrf that™ aUowedinthe amount of hardcover in the 0-75 sctoacK ^ ka nllnwed bevond that guideline. 75-25(y setback No Vote; Ayes3.N»y*2,M^.G;^^ jrf*our said the applicant would be («) «I5X WAWffiN AND CHWST^ BIEUCE. 25*5 D«NVVOODV VARIANCE - RESOEv ilON NO. 3927 Wanen and Christine Bidkewete present. Van Zomeren report^ thrt the ap^ojto 1^ wo lakeshote setback and ,s^ of the average lakeshote the garage to three The property had been setback but not as to ahead as^Birt^P ^^j^^^j 25g,jj,^35t SZS^cE^rUoZ^aed approval of fl« appUcation with the 35.«4 of hardcovH in the 7S250' setback. Godten noted that the p«.pe^ questioned the amount and before the surv^r as part of a previous application approval Mrs-Bielkereportedri^thebut^utor^r^^^^^^ kennel with Structure. There would be no net change, inenai in general on the property. Goetten.riredVanZonietentoupdstetheh«dcov»c«artd.^for‘l«ffl«^ M*’- Bielkc indicated that the survey was correct in its calculations. Keheymov^i.Petersonseconded.to.pproveResoluUonNo.3927. Vote; Ayesd.Nays 0, Abstain, 1, Jabbour. (Agenda item #7 follows Mayor/Councll Report. Item #3 was continned at this time.) % \ 6775013 T CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 8 9 9 ft A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 AND SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 AND 2 AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER SECTION 10.55 AND 10.56, SUBDIVISION 10 FILE NO. 2248 WHEREAS, David Rahn and Jodi Rahn (hereinafter the "applicants") are the owners of the property located at 1385 Rest Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 23, and all that part of Lots 15 and 22, and adjacent vacated alley. Subdivision of Lot 14, Rest Point Park, Lake Minnetonka, lying Southerly of the following- described line: Beginning at a point on the Southeasterly line of said Lot 15, distant 75 feet Northeasterly from the Southeasterly comer of said Lot 23; thence Northwesterly to the Southeasterly comer of said Lot 22; thence Northwesterly on a line forming an angle of 74 degrees 55 minutes with the Easterly line of said Lot 22, to the shore of Lake Mmnetonka, and there ending (hereinafter the "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances from Municipal Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 and Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2 to allow additional structure to be added to an existing residence. Variances for side yard setback to allow a south side yard setback of 5.3' where 10 ’ is required, hardcover in the 0-75’ setback to increase from 609.25 sq. ft. (9%) to 1,320.75 sq. ft. (19%) where none is allowed, and lakeshore setback to allow die addition to encroach into the 75’ setback the same distance as the existing residence arc required. A conditional use permit for land alteration in the 0-75’ setback and floodplain is required. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by (he City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1 . This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2248.TRANSFER ENTERED HENNEPIN COUNTif TAXP.V'Sn SEFiVCES Page 1 of 4 1553 € 1 fisHo: CITYofORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. S9 2R 2. The property is located in the LR-IB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District where the minimum lot area requirement is one acre. 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on June 16,1997 and recommended unanimous approval of the proposed variances and conditional use permit based upon the following unique findings and hardships: a.The zoning lot does not meet minimum lot area, lot width or side yard requirements. b. The existing structure conforms to the average lakeshore setback but does not meet the 75* lakeshore setback. c. 4. The topography of the zoning lot is within the floodplain in the middle of the zoning lot. d. The Zoning Code allows 15% lot coverage. e. The existing hardcover in the 0-75' setback is 609.25 sq. ft. (9%). The Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely aftect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow land alteration in the 0-75' setback and floodplain will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. ft Page 2 of 4 mfcr O’ CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL MO 8 9 26 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above fmdings, the Orono City Council U20 'd7oto be located 5.3' from the south property line where 5.3' is existing and 10 is require , an o allow a lakeshore setback at the same distance from the shoreline as the existing residence where 75' is required per Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.24, Subdivision 5 and Section 10.22. Subdivisi^ 1 and 2; and grants a conditional use permit for land alteration m the (^75 setback and floodplain per Section 10.56, Subdivision 10 and Section 10.55 to penmt existing s^cture located within the lakeshore setback on a zonmg lot that mcludes floodplam, subject to the following conditions*. No new hardcover shaU be allowed in the 0-75' setback. Further, any hardcover in the 75-250' setback shall be reduced by the amount of hardcover m the 0-75 setbacK. 2 Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the owners, but are only and must be exercised by application for a building permit and land aSon penrtt within one year of the date of CouncU's approval, or the spectal conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (July 14, 1998). 3 Violation of or non-compUance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority gieinted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4 The undersigned applicants have read, understobd and hereby agree to the “r^ “f ^ resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. ,‘Vjf %r *^j^->’^opted by the Orono City Council on this 14th day of July, 1997. ■ UiU&LliL llbrcthy M. Tfallin/City Clerk Pr6perty-Owner(s) GabrieNabbour, Mayor Page 3 of 4 m JUN-17-1993 0B:20 P.02^02 38 07-117-23 32 0002- J H HOUTMAN C K J HOUTMAN 1340 REST POINT LA mound MN 55364 38 07-117-23 32 0039 LARRY S SHARON GRABILL 1350 REST POINT RO HOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 33 0005 PATRICK J WALSH ^ 1390 REST POINT RO HOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 32 0061 KENNETH W C RENEE G EGGERT 1371 REST POINT LA mound MN 55364 38 07-117-23 33 0006 — J T NYGARO £ K H NYGARD 1386 REST POINT RO mound MN 55364 38 07-117-23 33 0010 WENDY M OLSON ^ 1405 REST POINT RO mound MN 55364 07-117-23 32 0037 — HICHAEL B C LYNNE SESLICHER 1375 REST POINT RD MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 33 0002 DAVID A WILLIAMS 1400 REST POINT RO mound MN 55364 38 07-117-23 33 0007 ^ DAVID K BLODGETT 1380 REST POINT RO MOUND HN 55364 38 07-117-23 32 0038 kirk ANDERSON 1373 REST POINT RO mound MN 55364 33 07-117-23 33 0004 LYLE K JOHNSON ^ 2737 IRVING AVc SO MPLS MN 55403 33 07-117-23 33 0009 ROBERT 6 BREOESON _ 15 E ST ALBANS RO HOPKINS MN 55305 07-117-23 33 0012 ^ gIoRGE R t THERESA A 3LC0M 1374 REST POINT RO mound MN 55364 total LABELS BATCH 502 OOC TOTAL P.02 Ill ^Or/I • (uaT) f.LA», .L»7 >. («3a»} 2^9. Vv-.*-. (Ml. / I f A 0^014 P u^dtt.^ 4.0'AUh €4.*AU ^ ' ✓ ✓ ✓ y > N (W2^) i’jf 'y ,*V' <P ,r 4'>vv ^" LEGAL DES6WTI0N OF PREMISES: y __« aaS* • ALot 2j;"^ <i thol port of Lots 15 and 22, vacated oley, SubdiviMon of Lot 14, Rost Point Pork, Ldto Igfinnotortta, lying Southorly of tho folowing-^CTit>od nno: Beginning at a point on tho Southoostorly Ino of said Int 1*i rfiafnnt 7*; #•-# W~^K-«-#-r4« ♦*>- •_ J’i? ^r; 5 K ^ ^ $ VA ^ t ^ Q T\ ^3 7T ^ < '\ ' HARDCOVER CALCULATSETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75'ATJOM^(^-25^jyORKSHEET250-500'.IW.fKEA. HouseG HARiy OVER IN ZONEP^ V Va nifi HCtL. COUNCIL MEETING JUL 2 7 1998 CITY OF ORQNO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 7/27/98 ITEM NO.; Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Assistant Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2392 Thomas Berscheid 1365 Rest Point Road Conditional Use Permit Zoning District: LR> 1B Lot Area: 21,318 One Family Rural Residential District square feet (.49 acres)___________ Application: The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct a detached garage on a through lot. The Zoning Code requires a Conditional Use Permit for accessory buildings located on through lots in "R” Zoning Districts. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommended by a 6 to 0 vote to: 1. Approve the Conditional Use Permit to permit a garage on a through lot. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To approve or amend the enclosed resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 10 FILE #2392 WHEREAS, Thomas Berscheid (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 1365 Rest Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as: Lot 12 and that part of Lot 13 lying East of a line running from a point in the Southerly line of Lot 13 distant 2 feet Westerly from Southeast comer of said Lot to a point in Northerly line of said Lot distant 45 1/2 feet Westerly from Northeast comer of Lot 13, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 20, 1998, at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon, and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 10 to permit the construction of an accessory structure on a through lot. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2392. 2. The propel cy is located in the LR-IB, One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. Page 1 of 4 3. 5. 6. The Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 20, 1998 and recommended approval on a vote of 6 to 0. 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: A. The accessory structure meets all required setbacks for the LR-IB Zoning District. B. The lot would meet required hardcover in the 250-500' lakeshore setback. C. The lot coverage requirement is met. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a garage on the through lot is not detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicants and the affect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 10 to permit the construction of a garage on the through lot located at 1365 Rest Point Road, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall construct the garage in substantial conformance with the survey dated May 19, 1998 on file with the Department of Building and Zoning. Page 2 of 4 2.Authorities granted by this resolution are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval or this conditional use permit will expire on that date (July 27, 1999). 3.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4,The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 27th day of July, 1998. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of July, 1998, by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199_before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared ______________________________________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199_before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared ________________________________________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 4 r TO:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE:July 6,1998 SUBJECT:#2392 Thomas Berscheid 1365 Rest Point Road Conditional Use Permit-Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre) Lot Area:21,318 square feet (.49 acres) Application: The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct a detached garage on a through lot. The Zoning Code requires a Conditional Use Permit for accessory buildings located on through lots in "R” Zoning Districts. ______________ Pertinent Ordinances: Section 10.02(42): Definition of a Through Lot Section 10.03, Subd. 9: Accessory Structures Section 10.03, Subd. 10: Accessory Structure - Conditional Use Permit Section 10.24, Subd. 5(B): LR-IB Setback Requirements r ANALYSIS Lot Area and Yards LR-IB District Standards Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard 1 acre 140 ft.35 ft.10 ft.30 ft. Subject Property Lot Area and Yards Lot Area Lot Width Street Yard Side Yard Side Yard .49 acres 125.4 ft.82 ft.- existing 70 ft.- existing 64 ft.22 ft. .49 acres 125.4 ft.49.7 ft-proposed 13.4 ft-proposed 22 ft. The lot does not meet zoning district standards for lot area and lot width. Although, the garage would meet all required setbacks. No variances are needed with this application. Structural Coverage Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage 21,318 s.f Existing: 918 s.f.4.3% 21,318 s.f.Proposed: 1,494 s.f.7.0% The lot does meet the 15% structural coverage requirement. 1^2592 Thomas Berscheid 1365 Rest Point Road Conditional Use Permit 7/20/98 Page! Hardcover Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Existing Hardcover Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Variance Requested 0 ’-75'none 0 0 0 none 75'-250'none 0 0 0 none 250'-500 ’21,318 s.f 3,490 s.f (16%) 6,395 s.f. (30%) 3,718 s.f. (17%) none 500'-1000'none 0 0 0 none The applicant is only requesting a slight increase in hardcover on the property. The hardcover will remain well under the allowed hardcover percentage in the 250* to 500' zone. Conditional Use Permit Findings: 1. 2. That the proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Chapter and the purposes of the district in which the site is located and Comprehensive Municipal Plan. The use of the property, as a single family dwelling, is in accord with the Zoning Chapter. The applicant is not proposing to change the use on the lot. The Zoning Code requires a Conditional Use Permit for accessory structures, to include garages, on any "through lot". The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant's survey places the garage conforming to required setback distances. That the proposed location of the conditional use and the proposed condition under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed location of the structure will not be detrimental to public health or safety. The garage will be constructed to Building Code standards. Its' impact on neighboring properties will be minimal. A wooded area exists directly behind the proposed garage and between the garage and the neighboring property. Placing the structure further back M2392 Thomas Berscheid /365 Rest Point Road Conditional Use Permit 7/20/98 Page3 3. on the property would require removing trees and increasing hardcover for a longer driveway. That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Chapter. Garages are a permitted accessory use within "R” districts. The Zoning Code requires accessory structures to be setback 3 5-feet from a street or no closer to the street than the principal structure on the lot. On a through lot two street yards exist creating a umque situation. The Code requires accessory structures to not be closer to the street than the principle building. For this reason the Zoning Code requires a conditional use permit. No variances are required with the application as all setbacks and building size requirements are would be met. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit to construct a garage, as an accessory structure on a through lot, based on the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall obtain a building permit from the City of Orono prior to constructing the garage. 2. The applicant shall construct the garage in substantial conformance with the survey dated May 19,1998 on file with the Department of Building and Zoning, 3.The applicant receives a building permit within one year of Council granting the conditional use permit. U2392 Thomas Berscheid 1365 Rest Point Road Conditional Use Permit 7/20/98 Page4 EXHIBIT A Application U ^5^ Date Received ^ Amount Paid / 75^. CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address V^V«*s \ Type of Application to be Filed 8 K2 ~ST Property Identification Number (PJ.D.) tyi'- HT—^3 43- APPLICANT V (home) Name _______ Phone (work)— Address \v ______City 8 OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _______________ Phone (home). Phone (work)_ Address Date Propeily-Acquired City Zip. ^rojjfiiljfcAci _ (month/year) FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - _____$ 75.00 For each variance request with CUP application $175.00 Residential Accessory Use” on ^ -fh«X)5h _____$250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) _____$225.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments _____$200.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg _____$300.00 Commercial/Industrial Use _____$250.00 Land Alteration ____ Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain ____ Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more ____ Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore _____PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule _____$150.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) _____After-the>Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee U2.-/S D/sj/iiq- OTHER APPLICATIONS _____$250.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) _____$300.00 Vacation _____$200.00 Easement Vacation _____$100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _____$350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) _____$350.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _____$100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule 1 /(4) t i (M) 4 y "tN ' « \ 5-. 1 110) <V00D TR 8C0 /w %-—^OHpi 400 CHIPPEWA LA BAYSIDE . oFORi cm 0 0 ClassenLake\ north 't’ >» 400 *v . Lakcview;:., ^ « V. 4... ELM< tyjGolfpw:;;: ( WEST BRANCH RD . "OO @ ■y/^v^p. \ .... .<•• .».; R; --^r or ti ORONO VI HIGirV^ WATERTOWN «D ^CHRISTINE DR « ^(/> cv ATfl3 ^ EILEENTfl? uj vVA * t T* »■* S tubbs to -1— ' EAST.LAKE-^ BAYS IDE RD 'if.FOX i\4 / 1^b^'s '^ofestj “ ? GRANDVIEW ^f^Lake^ ft wm ^f^0Bay0 ® EXHIBIT C EXHIBIT D /S# » llt.l J H W %MX MtOJta $A iJOl7-OOI #2392 EXHIBIT F hardcover calculation worksheet __ ____ % mSTIWG HARnrovrn ii^ A. House 75-250’'250-500 Length DO Width B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Other X X X 3>cl X X X X X X X X X Ho TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PI^reRTY AREA IN ZONE - - B . iM PROPOSPn HARDCnVF.R IN 70NP A. House Length Width X X X D. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G, Other \b X X • X X X X X X X Hb v\ TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE «. ^. - B •a.\,7A‘^X 100 D 500-1000' S.F. S.F. SJ. S.F. S.F. Hbt> S.F. SJ. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. \\o A B S.F. S.F. S.F. •S.F. S.F. S.F. locn -S.F. S.F. •S.F. ■S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SJ. •S.F. S.F. S.F. —V3c _____Vo cI ■JMM DATE fA/12/98 8ATCH 582 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY XNFORNATION SYSTEN PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PZA35401 PACE 7PROP AODR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AODR 58 87-117-25 52 885781575 REST POINT RO N B • L K 6ERLXCHER HXCHAEL B t LYNNE OERLXCHER 1575 REST POINT RD HOUrat NN 55584 38 87-117-23 52 805881573 REST POINT RO K E ANDERSON 8 A K KRAHER KXRK ANDERSON 1375 REST POXm RD HOUND NN 55384 38 87-117-25 52 805981558 REST POINT RO L 8 S 6RABXLL LARRY 8 'SHARON QRABXLL 1358 REST POINT RO HOUND MN 55384 PROP AODR OWNER NAW TAXPAYER NANE/AODR 58 87-117-25 52 8052 81515 REST POINT LA K J GROVER ASK GROVER KEVIN J GROVER AND SUSAN K GROVER 1515 REST POINT LA HXNNETRISTA HN 55584 38 87-117-23 32 0053 04875 NORTH SHORE DR TYLER C CORBIN TYLER C CORBIN 4885 NORTH SHORE DR HOUND NN 55384 38 07-117-25 52 0054 01545 REST POINT LA JOSHUA D URAN JOSHUA URAN 1545 RESTPOINT LA HOUND HN 55584 PROP AODR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR Sa 07-117-2S 52 0054 04405 NORTH SNORE DR TYLER C CORBIN TYLER C CORBIN 4405 NORTH SHORE DR HOUND HN 55344 30 07-117-23 32 0040 01344 REST POINT RD LAWRENCE E ft HELEN LANGHAHS LAWRENCE E ft HELEN LANGHAHS 1344 REST POINT RD HOUND HN 55344 30 07-117-23 32 0041 01371 REST POINT LA KENNETH H ft RENEE 6 E6GERT KENNETH Hi ft RENEE 0 E6GERT 1371 REST POINT LA HOUND HN 55344 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 30 07-117-23 32 0042 01354 REST POINT CIR B A SCHEBLER ft S B SCHEBLER B A SCHEBLER ft S B SCHEBLER 1354 REST POINT CIR HOUND HN 55344 30 07-117-23 33 0004 01304 REST POINT RD J T NYGARD ft K H NYGARD J T NYGARD ft K H NYGARD 1304 REST POINT RD HOUND HN 55344 30 07-117-23 33 0007 01300 REST POINT RD DAVID K BLODGETT DAVID K BLODGETT 1300 REST POINT RD HOUND HN 55344 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 30 07-117-23 33 0011 01305 REST POINT RD D W ft J L RAHN DAVID W ft JODI L RAHN 1305 REST POINT RD HOUND HN 55344 30 07-117-21 33 0012 01374 REST POINT RD G R BLOOH ft T A BLOOH GEORGE R ft THERESA A BLOOH 1374 REST POINT RD HOUND HN 55344 . J TOTAL BATCH 502 00032 L JMM DATE •A/12/9S ■ATCN 5*2PMP AODR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 38 17-117-23 31 tm •1347 REST POINT CXR H E PINECAR IRA P1NE6AR NZLLZAM 8 REBECCA PINEGAR 1347 REST POINT CXR HOUND NN 55364 38 •7-117-23 31 ••19 •4545 NORTH SHORE DR C A I H L ALBRECHT TRUSTEES HAROLD L 8 CAROL A ALBRECHT 4545 NORTH SHORE DR HOUND HN 55364 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LISTSB •7-117-23 31 0017 •1337 REST POINT CXR ROBERT H ZAUN ROBERT H ZAUN 1337 REST POINT CXR HOUND MN 55364 38 BT-llT-ZS 31 0929 •1336 REST POINT CIR JANICE X DE HATTEO JANICE K OE HATTEO 1336 REST POINT CIRCLE HOUND NN 55364 REPORT NO. PZ435461 PAGE 638 07-117-23 31 001801320 REST POINT CXR SHAWN KEAKINS *SHAWN N^INS 1320 REST POINT CXR HOUND HN 55364 38 07-117-23 31 0021 01340 REST POINT CXR JACK EDWARDS KUTZ JACK EDWARDS KUTZ 1340 REST POINT CXR HOUND HN 55364 ^ wBD3O NNo I fIlOf ADDH OMMEi NAHE TAXfAYEII NANE/ADDE PROP AODR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR PROP AODR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR M #7-117-23 31 ##22 01342 REST POINT CIR H J ALTENHOFEN ET AL HARK J ALTENHOFEN 1342 REST POINT CIR HOUND HN 55364 38 07-117-23 31 0028 00038 ADDRESS UNASSI6NED R08ERT L iIRKELANO t NIFE ROBERT L BIRKELAND 1208 NILOHURST TRAIL HOUND HN 55364 38 07-117-23 32 0024 04615 TONKAVIEN U KATHLEEN 8 ASH KATHLEEN 6 ASH 4615 TONKAVIEN LA HOUND HN 55364 38 07-117-23 31 0023 01348 REST POINT CIR KID HANKINSON KEITH 0 t DONNA H HANKINSON 1348 REST POINT CIR HOUND NN 55364 38 07-117-23 31 0031 01299 NILDHURST TR PATTI NAE SCHIHHEL PATTI NAE SCHINNEL 1299 NILDHURST TR HOUND NN 55364 38 07-117-23 32 0025 04625 TONKAVIEN LA R H SHELTON I N L SHELTON R H SHELTON i N L SHELTON 4625 TONKAVIEN LA HOUND HN 55364 38 07-117-23 31 0024 01350 REST POINT CIR RICHARD JL ANFINSON RICHARD 1 ANFINSON 1350 REST POINT CIR HOUND HN 55364 38 07-117-23 32 0002 01340 REST POINT U J H HOUTHAN B K J HOUTHAN J H HOUTHAN t K J HOUTHAN 1340 REST POINT LA HOUND HN 55364 38 07-117-23 32 0026 04629 TONKAVIEN LA J R ADRAHAHSON/D ADRAHAHSON JAHES R ft DANN ABRAHAHSON 4629 TONKAVIEN LA HOUND HN 55364-9631 4 . / • .« I PROP ADOR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 07-117-23 32 0030 01310 REST POINT LA E D ft C L REINHART ERIC D REINHART 1310 REST POINT LA HOUND HN 55364 38 07-117-23 32 0031 01360 REST POINT CIR D ft J BOIES JR DAVID B ft JENNIFER BOIES JR 1360 REST POINT CIRCLE HOUND HN 55364 38 07-117-23 32 0034 01365 REST POINT RD THOHAS NICHOLAS BERSCHEID THOHAS NICHOLAS BERSCHEID 1365 REST POINT RD HOUND HN 55364 »» y^oojd EXHIBIT H PERMIT RECORD 1 1 Permit No.Date Tvpe of ft Permit 30S-S7 A^d^UJ- HOUS^ 2V3S ‘7-^3-‘?3 PtQ(^ s<im S“-/necH. /• ?• sra Fist'l /' 3.9-9 y fl2-b 1 ^7f7 <f/3-97 9sz4 /6-^i-91 97 ___________________________ • ___ 2-'S. J9 'iVjt-cJL ‘77fc/D. !%. ?!S 'P-£i><yn ’y^. __________________________ \ j r COUNCIL MEETING JUL 2 7 1998 CITY or ORONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Administrator Reviewed:Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Assistant Zoning Administrator Item Description: #2396 Clint and Jody Morrison 3510 Bayside Road Variances DATE: 7/27/98 ITEM NO.: | ^ Agenda Section: Zoning Zoning District: LR-IA Lot Area: Application: 59,282 One Family Rural Residential District square feet (1.36 acres) The applicant s have proposed ic remove their current residence to construct a new house and attached garage. They ^ requesting a variance from lot size requirements to construct a principal structure on a lot that is 1.36 acres where 2 acres is required. A second variance from average lakeshore setback requirements is necessary to build on the property. The property also contains an accessory structure that the applicants have requested to remain on the property during the c.iiiolition Md reconstruction period. A third variance is necessary for an accessory structure to remain on the lot without a principal structure. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION; The Planning Commission recommended by a 6 to 0 vote to: 1. Approve the variances to permit the applicant's to rebuild on the lot and allow the accessory structure to remain on the property without a principal structure. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To approve or amend the enclosed resolution. r A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 9(A); SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1(B); SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16(C)(6); AND SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6(B) FILE NO. #2396 WHEREAS, Clint Morrison and Jody Morrison (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 3510 Bayside Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows; Lots 26 and 27, Auditor's subdivision NO. 203, except that part of Lot 27, said Subdivision, lying Northerly of a line described as follows: Conunencing at a point in the East line of said Lot 27, 292.49 feet South of the Northeast comer thereof; thence Northwesterly to a point in the West line of said Lot 27, 261 feet South of the Northwest comer of said Lot 27, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 20, 1998, at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 9(A) to permit an accessory structure to remain while the existing structure is demolished and a new principal structure is constmcted; to Section 10,22, Subdivision 1(B) and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C)(6) to permit the construction of a residence which encroaches past the average lakeshore setback where no encroachment is normally allowed; and to Section 10.23, Subdivision 6(B) to permit a principal structure on a 1.36 acre lot where lot area of 2 acres is normally required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: Page 1 of 4 1 3. FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2396. The property is located in the LR-IA One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 20, 1998 and recommended approval on a vote of 6 to 0 for a variance based upon the following findings: 4. A. The accessory structure would remain on the lot without a principal structure during the demolition and reconstruction period. B. The lot is located on a comer creating a situation where the entire buildable part of the lot encroaches into the average lakeshore setback distance. C. The lot size is 1.36 acres where 2 acres is required for the zoning district. D. The lot meets all hardcover and structural coverage requirements. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this TOning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substontid property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping vdth the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 2 of 4 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 9(A) to permit an accessory structure to remeiin while the existing structure is demolished and a new principal structure is constructed; Section 10.22, Subdivision 1(B) and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C)(6) to permit the construction of a residence which encroaches past the average lakeshore setback where no encroachment is normally allowed; and to Section 10.23, Subdivision 6(B) to permit a principal structure on a 1.36 acre lot where lot area of 2 acres is normally required. 1. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (July 27, 1999). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of July, 1998. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of July, 1998, by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared__________________________;—;----------------- known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of Notary Public , 199_before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared___________________________—^--------------— known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 4 TO:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE: SUBJECT: July 9,1998 #2396 Clint and Jody Morrison 3510 Bayside Road Variances—Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-1A Lot Area:59,282 One Family Lakeshore Residential District (2 Acre) square feet (1.36 acres)__________________ Application:The appliceints have proposed to remove their current residence to construct a new house and attached garage. The applicants are requesting a variance from lot size requirements to construct the structure. A second variance from average lakeshore setback requirements is necessary to build on the property. The property also contains an accessory structure that the applicants have requested to remain on the property during the demolition and reconstruction period. P ' udance is necessary for an accessory structure to remain on the lot without a principal structure._________________________ Pertinent Ordinances: Section 10.22, Subd. 1(A): Lakeshore Setback Regulations Section !0.22, Subd. 1(B): Average Lakeshore Setback Regulations Section 10.56 (16)(C)(6): Average Lakeshore Setback Regulations Section 10.23: One Family Lakeshore Residential District Section 10.03: Accessory Structures ^riWiic TiTdimiVH rnY9mivi iWWtl ^JthUMOfiA smrii mmmE rnjwiTmmnrfMiMum Structural Coverage Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage 59,282 s.f.Existing: 2,966 5.0% Proposed: 4,395 7.4% The lot does meet the 15% structural coverage requirement. ANALYSIS Variance STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP The applicant's have included their statement of hardship in Exhibit A. The applicant should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. Criteria for Determining Undue Hardship 1. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The property can continue to be used in its current state with the existing structure. The use of the property would remain residential should the variances be approved. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The property was platted before the 2 acre minimum lot size was required for the zoning district. It is not possible for the lot to meet average lakeshore setback standards, due to the lot being located on a comer. The entire buildable area of the lot is within the average lakeshore setback. The neighboring lots do have view access of the lake across the applicant's property. The applicant has indicated their lot is very wooded creating a visual shield between the homes. 02S96 Ciinton and Jody Morrison 3510 Bay side Road yariances 7/20/98 Page 3 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Both variances would not change the locality, as the property currently functions as a single-family residence. 4. 5. Economic consider .tions alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of this chapter. Economic factors are not a consideration with this application. Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Solar access is not a consideration. 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance for any use that is not permitted under this Chapter for the property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The use of the property would remain residential, which is consistent with the zoning. 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. The applicant will not be changing the dwelling status of the property. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure of land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The property does contain a unique charfrcteristic as it is located on a comer, resulting in the nearly all of the lot being located wiihm the average lakeshore setback. The lot is almost entirely wooded creating a visual barrier between homes along Bayside Road. The lot was platted prior to current zoning regulations resulting in a non- conforming lot. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. The applicant's lot is located on a comer making it impossible to use as a buildable lot without an average lakeshore setback variance. 92S96 CUnion and Jody Morrison 3510 Bay side Road yariances 7/20/98 Page A r 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The location of the lot has made it impossible for the applicant's to construct a new home. Nearly all lots in the zoning district would meet the average lakeshore setback. 11 . The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. The granting of variances would not be a public concern. The variance from lot size would be contrary to the Zoning Code. The applicant's have stated it is not possible to create a two acre lot by adding to their lot. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. The variances would alleviate a hardship for lakeshore setback and the lot size they have inherited. Issues 1. The applicant is seeking three variances (from average lakeshore setback requirements and lot size) and a third for an accessory structure to remain on the lot without a principal structure. 2.The accessory structure would only remain on the lot without a principal structure during the demolition and reconstruction period. 3.The lot is located on a comer making it impossible to meet average lakeshore setback requirements. 4. 5. The lot size is 1.36 acres where 2 acres is required for the LR-1A zoning district. TTie lot does meet all hardcover and structural coverage requirements. M2396 Clinton and Jody Morrison 3510 Bayside Road Variances 7/20/98 Page 5 j STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the variances for average lakeshore setback and lot size. Staff recommends approval of the variance for an accessory structure to remain on the property without a principal structure. Attachments A B C D E F G H I J Application and Statement of Hardship Plat Map Location Map Topographic Map/New Site Plan Survey/Existing Site Plan Topographic Map/Existing Site Plan Permit Record Hardcover Calculations Property Owners List Permit Record §2596 Clinton and Jody Morrison 3510 Bayside Road Variances 7/20/98 Page 6 r EXHIBIT A Application # ^*3^^ Date Received -^8 Amount Paid CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 Afler-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address ; Qvnrvo Pronerty Identification Numbcf (P.I.D.) ' T«” CD Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)____________________________ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired "Wr. v _______________________^(month/year) I (do) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: residential other (specify). Zoning District: ISl- CTie 1?lmii>A APPLICANTriTJuiv./^^ * Phone (home] A13 - _ Name dV;KVn>f\ -t- V9\Drc\q>DX^ Phone (workl^Q^ Address: A^. City: OnntvQ_________Zip: OWNTR (if different than applicant) Name ___________________ Phone (home). Phone (work)_ Address:City:Zip:. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ AoO . QOO Describe request in detail: ^ o.VcS^>X>C\. V.oQX]^\:x.o<r\ » . —---- (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED y Lot Area ___Lot Width Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage ^ Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: Qumr octoogjC'VtV ^ QS^Jr^ / ciCX>Q3i^ ^ (attach additional sheets ii necessary) r EXHIBIT C V . I I ___ ._ i__ 1200 • ■ y\ • ^ ^ :........ \ vT'w,' < • '■ ^ • . »•. V X : “vA-.r.^ • .\ V:*: - .4^i »)>.• v,*' •. ■-■•r^YV,- m • . ^ - • ;.:' ''irv-'r ■?;•<* I .>. A.,- :V^i -.'^IJN .. * v/ * A «,<• V ■»•« i.*J. I-^ .. ■KWOOO TR ON PI CHIPPEWA lA OROMO w#5 o ** BAYSlOE RD HIGH LA CHRISTINE DR ' V-1 ‘r;,'Viv-' ■ ^ Pi'^r. <• ^ Lakcview^ 400 g 800 Stubbs ftnv ST BAY] SIDE RD Q 1 North LINDEN OAHl RJ LOMAUNO. AVE^ FOX Maxwell Bay ii I 11 .A ^ \ 4^v Q ^ i) \ \ */f^ 4' <fi yn & y \^y/;y'y' 0y^M- ■-K N \ X Mmsii \ \i \ A \l \\ \ *.\ \ 9 U.11 \1/ \ / c AWcS a \ «>: \‘V % \m 5k>. I -A \ «»^'^94; “P/ \ \ \'V %\\ \ X 0»> \ \ \ i A»X CojVc ^..-1 ?0 25^^ a. 'A> N ( 5: $ 3? Win w*kmbaO O 29 Cdi « t / V K I X\\^' ^4'' ■■\ ',■?\ V't'-t \ \ V \ # \ \ \ I'/'/’i ,'i \ ' ''J » I ' / / • 1 I Oi / / ; . V . / / i * • I ' f N f!#\ll//'i\\\ V’. V \-<^-^-w.’'^-1 /■V j I fX-<v.. / ( / ' /,/ / / / / I'M'V^114!V>\^AV/ /~r^! j 1' \/',l'\\'\\'A\^^\^-^■ ' '\ ^ Y\' \ \ \i\ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \(VjV'.4yA\X^ \ V/ X V \ \ ■’X \ N \ - \ >. /^ " y y V>^'.'/yyyy fM/Mii \ y V ^ ^ y/y'^ 'y<'' > 4tm^fif,A \\\V w y\\ \ / \ y \ •A, ^ />. x^ \'VK \ /' ■'«f ”*&'\ '9i \ I*?" 9-4^ >«V / / / / / //: / xr r.-.i / / --m- ^:jz=j #i&{; /K V \ \^', \ \ V'. * ^ \ y\W \ '' \ I ' „fv' • 1 /^A-A \ *1 \ \fy \'. t \'. \ ' 'fc »I > >' \ \ N # ooo / '' / \ •<?, \ \ V \\ V \ ■? / N X ’^cr.N <> I iff > / % /\\A\W\' U_i 7 -t /( rl \ Vy.^ \ y- 'yy X li ^^0,0q 1 m SHARRATTDESIGN COMPANY MEMO Date: Project: YA0lffA^}4 H< Subject: EXHIBIT G e(S9US9l9n §Y Information/PBcIsion I t aiP/grK<g.ft_fc><l6rlb^ U/i Wyg-UArf SI SF. f4is sr. ^ 8F ftojsa 225^> a*. J3^A2|=^____432* iUf.8M4 8P. PHoPosetO 100 -SP I30<r0 tv-. gp. ^«2. 6P. 4oo SP. 560 SP lo.geasp. 6ITE. /PBA % HAkpoovk *)^ 60, lio gp |C».^‘2> 9c gb.Z.to SP 2.1 6590 Woodside Lane Shorewood. Mnnesota 55331 470-9750 Fax470-B407-E-mail: SDe^gnC Q AOL : •RUN DAT! •A/98/9S 8A7CN §97 mmiPIN COUNTY PROPERTY XNFORNATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PIA3M01 PAGE 20 • )PROP AODR OWNER NANS TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR 38 05-117-23 13 001503500 BAYSIOE RD K 8ANGERT 8 V 8ANGERT K iANGERT I V 8ANGERT 3500 RAYSXDE RD LONG LAKE NN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 001603510 RAYSIDE RD C H HORRXSON I J P HORRISON CLINTON H 8 JODY P HORRISON 3510 BAYSIOE RD LONG LAKE NN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 001703560 BAYSIDE RD KYLE FAHXLY LTD PTNRSHP RICHARD 8 KATHLEEN A KYLE 1160 TONKAWA RO LONG LAKE HN 55356 PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 05-117-23 13 0067 00038 ADDRESS UNASSXmED KYLE FAHXLY LTD PTNRSHP R KYLE SKA KYLE 1160 TONKAWA RD LONG LAKE HN 5535> 38 05-117-23 13 0068 00038 ADDRESS UHASSX6NED K R 8 L T OLSEN KEVIN R OLSEN 3580 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 TOTAL BATCH 507 00008 . t I X CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AH ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF XNFORHATXON AS XT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTHENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF HY KWWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE ^-9-98 Ty f C -&5\C>S>twAiLAoEXHIBIT I PERMIT RECORD Permit No.Date Type of Permit //j Ai/nn 1 A-A6 JS29 :9-AA -ISQ^__7-2/-SZ '3dyj j Jj/no Ce1d:f • «•• • • •• • ' • • • m•• • • • • • • • i I . • > • • • % * * ‘ I ¥ COUNCIL ?/i;2T N3 JUL 2 T 1998 CITYOFCRONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 7/27/98 ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Name Paul Weinberger Title Assistant Zoning Administrator Agenda Section: Zoning • Item Description:#2397 Joe and Leslee Lucas 1060 North Brown Road Variance Zoning District:LR-IA One Family Rural Residential District Lot Area:79,541.5 square feet (1.83 acres) Application: The applicant is requesting a variance from side yard setback requirements to allow an addition to the residence. He has also proposed to add a basement under the existing attached garage to install drain tile. The existing residence is 9.4 feet from the side lot line. The proposed addition would be 9 feet from the lot line where 30 feet is required. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommended by a 6 to 0 vote to: 1. Approve the variance from side yard setback requirements to permit an addition to the applicant's house. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To approve or amend the enclosed resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6(B) FILE NO. #2397 WHEREAS, Joe Lucas and Leslee Lucas (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 1060 North Brown .vuuu wiJun the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: The North 200 feet of the South 1,752.04 feet of the West 430 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Section 27, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 20, 1998, at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this appli ‘"*‘''n were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6(B) to permit the construction of an addition to the principal structure located 9 feet from the side lot line where jO feet is required. Minnesota; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning i'ile #2397. 2 property is located in the LR-IA One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning Distiict. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 20, 1998 and recommended approval on a vote of 6 to 0 for a variance based upon the following findings; Page 1 of 4 4. A. The residence is cunently 9.4 feet from the side lot line. B. The proposed addition would be 9 feet from the side lot line. C. The si2e and style of the residence, with the proposed addition, is similar to other homes in the area. D. The basement with drain tile is necessary to support the existing basement and addition to the residence. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the vanances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6(B) to permit the construction of an additiou, with basement and drain tile to the residence located 9 feet from the side lot line. 1. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not ^th the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (July 27, 1999). 2. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be pumshable as a misdemeanor. 3. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of theraselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of tbs City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of July, 1998 ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner (s) Page 3 of 4 - ' f -!' STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of July, 1998, by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this____day of__________________199 ___before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared _______ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this____ _______ and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. TO: FROM: DATE: Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Memben Ron Moorse, City Administrator Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator July 16,1998 SUBJECT: /^2397 Joe and Leslee Lucas Variances—Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: Application: LR-IA One Family Lakeshore Residential District (2 Acre) acres) to dtow attack requirements is r^torS “*■ from the lot li^ were 30’ Pertinent Ordinances: Section 10.23: LR-1A One Family Lakeshore Residential District ^2397 Joe and Leslee Lucas i060 North Brown Rood Variance 7/20/98 Page I ANALYSIS Lot Area and Yards The lot requires a variance from side yard setback requirements. The existing house is at the 9.4' setback. TTiis addition would be 9' from the lot line. Structural Coverage Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage 79,541.5 s.f.Existing: 2,208.95 s.f. Proposed: 4,598.65 s.f. 2.8% 5.8% The lot does meet the 15% structural coverage requirement. STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP The applicants' statement of hardship is included as Attachment A. They should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. Criteria for Determining Undue Hard^ip 1. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The property has a history of drainage problems. The garage foundation must be removed and replaced. Adding a full basement under the garage and new drain tile would function to keep the existing basement dry and would support the new addition currently being built on the south and west sides of the residence. U2397 Joe and Lesiee Lucas 1060 North Brown Road Variance 7/20/98 Page! 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The home was constructed before current zoning standards. It also has a history of drainage problems that have eroded the garage foundation. 3. The variance, if granteu, may alter the essential character of the locality. The size and style of the remodeled home would be consistent with other properties in the locality. 4. 5. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance for any use that is not permitted under this Chapter for the property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Single family residential use is permitted in the LR-1A (One Family Lakeshore Residential) zoning district. The special conditions applying to the structure of land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The structure is currently located within the setback distance, and the current property owners have inherited water erosion problems. 6. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. The existing residence was constructed only 9.4 feet from the side lot line. The applicant has stated the best way to control drainage is the addition of the drain tile under the garage. They also intend to add to the living space of the home within the setback. 7.The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The granting of the variance is not necessary to enhance the use of the structure. It is to create more living space within the residence, and help control water erosion. Joe and Leslee Lucas 1060 North Brown Road Variance 7/2C/98 Page 3 8.The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or u fficulty. The applicant has proposed to increase the size and functionality of the residence both outside of and within the setback. Only a portion of the addition will be necessary to control drainage problems. The addition of first floor living space within the setback would not improve or alter the drainage on the property. To support the addition the applicant has stated drain tile is necessary under the garage. Issues 1. 2. The applicant has proposed additions to the house that will encroach into the side yard setback. The existing structure is 9.4 ’ fix>m the lot line. The new addition would be 9' from the lot line. The zoning district requires a 30* side yard setback. The garage foundation would be removed and replaced resulting from excessive ground water erosion. 3. The size and style of the residence, with the new addition, is similar to odier homes in the area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the variance from side yard setbacks for replacement of the garage foundation to add a basement and drain tile to support the addition currently under construction, and for additional living space. The size and style of the proposed home is consistent with other lots in the locality. Attachments A B C D E F G H 1 Applicants Statement of Hardship Variance Application Location Map Plat Map Topographic Map Survey Floor and Exterior Plans Property Owners List Permit Record U2597 Joe and Leslee Lucas 1060 North Brown Road Variance 7/20/98 Pag^6 EXHIBIT ALeslee and Joe Lucas 1060 North Brown Road Orono, MN 55356 404-9542 City of Orono Variance Application Hardship/Description of Unusual Property Conditions We are removing the existing garage foundation because of excessive ground water erosion. The New Foundation will not excede the existing setback requirement set when we purchased the Property. We are adding 4 new sump baskets to sob'e our ground water problem. We need to add the lull basement beneath the existing garage^M^ space to add new drain tile to keep the existing basement dry. The area directly behind the existing basement is very wet all Spring. The 30* Setback will make it impossible to add any space to our existing Living Room and Kitchen. r EXHIBIT B CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 Afler-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION i ^ Ps |o(r?o l\br^ ^ Application # ^3^ “7 Date Received Amount Paid Site Address_______^_________________________ Property Identification Number (T.I.D.) D7 * //^ - 2 ^ ^ 0005^________ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. | Date Prope^^cquired_______jS .2^- _____________________^(month/year) ^ I (do) (^0 n^ also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present uSJTof property: ^ residential ___pother (specify). ' ZoningDistrict:___________/ A___________________________________________^ O APPLICANT Name____ ______ ____ Address: \0(oO B>toton /Qrl City: Phone (horned ^0 ^ VJ— Phone (work) Hllc " Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ■^}4A\£~‘ Phone (home). Phone (work)_ Address:Citv:Zip:. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST •? ‘*• t' ■Estimated Construction Cost $ TXw^ ^ ^ >1 I I • •Describe request in detail: AJiTVO W^TdHgAj I L[vh\i6‘ ficony loftk. /(/gvO /^/VsgTn^rivjr •4»e. / j^mucs . (attach additional sheets if necessary) f VARIANCES REQUIRED ___Lot Area ___Lot Width ___Hardcover ___^Lot Coverage \/&Setback:Front Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) I^-IA 3C>* HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: ______________________________ (attach additional sheets if necessary) ^.. il ' F F F F A ii\ V- c 6:r 41^:. 4U •**. .* •« r LUCAb16iI I fU --------j Italil in «r «i mH liM. Mil 6612 — CO*• » i •• i kA •2*x2*xV Concrete Pads-WoodBeams12* 2J.34' 5M* Wt)l •< •9*. Cnwispaca Area B 9* SSSBS Wood Beam teliflS■ 5M- Wall16*Lastea ft Joa LucasScale: 1/8* • O" ' . Existing Basement AreaBasement Area14* 12 ’ NORTH • N«r»J Wni\^ 8 ’----► lOBM H2.0 U«^tfT Er?rr%v%w>Concrete Sonatube 4* Froft Wall A-' 4’ Frost Walls ■ O- N^EvySufAp I Start At A* Prf Basement Level Floor Plan 42’ Start of 8 ’ Wall*.ki ‘. Start of 4* Frost Wall* -O <iolFMasl«f 1 ■Bath ¥alk-la(------------]■TP ■!BlockD V J <W RUN DATE t6/26/9SructioniATCH 50APROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 27-118-23 31 001502020 SALEH CT IZABELLA STIPAKOV IZABELLA STIPAKOV 2020 SALEH CT LONG LAKE HN 55356 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST38 27-118-23 31 001602080 SALEH CT D L 8 B D PANZER DENNIS 8 BEVERLY PANZER 2080 SALEH CT LONG LAKE HN 55356 REPORT NO. PI635901 PAGE 1238 27-118-23 31 002001095 BROWN RD N J R HARESH 8 D J HARESH JOHN HARESH 8 DIANE HARESH 2085 COUNTY RD 6 ORONO HN 55356PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 27-118-23 92 000501060 BROWN RD N J 8 L LUCAS JOSEPH R LUCAS 1060 BROWN RD N LONG LAKE m 55356 38 27-118-23 92 001301080 BROWN RD N HAROLD F BOWER ETAL HAROLD F BOWER 1080 N BROWN RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 27-118-23 92 001901925 LAKEVIEW TER HAROLD F BOWER 8 WIFE HAROLD F BOWER 1080 N BROWN RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 *18 N89 M S X PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 27-118-23 92 0015 01865 LAKEVIEW TER K R ASKE 8 S K ASKE KARL R 8 SHERRILYN D ASKE 1865 LAKEVIEW TERRACE LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 27-118-23 92 0020 01965 COUNTRY CLUB RD PATRICIA A HONDALE PATRICIA A IHONDALEI CONNER 1965 COUNTRY CLUB RD LONG LAKE Ml 55356 38 27-118-23 92 0018 01990 COUNTRY CLUB RD H J W SHITH 8 H F SHITH HARVIN J W SHITH 1990 COUNTRY CLUB RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 27-118-23 92 0019 01020 BROWN RD N H J ROSE ADA KIRBY HELANIE ROSE 8 DENNIS KIRBY 1020 BROWN RD N LONG LAKE HN 55356 TOTAL BATCH 506 00010 ^ 4/) I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AM ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORI OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TARATllOH/ TO THtBEST OF NY KN0MLED6E AND BELIEF.aDATE COUNCIL MEETING JUL 7 1998 CITYOrORQNO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: July 27, 1998 ITEM NO, Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Administrator's Report Item Description: Resolution for Regional Mutual Aid Association Membership The Lake Minnetonka Area Cooperating Cities have been working on developing cooperative working relationships for the sharing of equipment and personnel in response to emergency disaster situations. There is an existing Twin Cities Area Regional Mutual Aid Association with many City and County members. The Lake Minnetonka Area Coperating Cities group has decided that this would be a valuable organization to join. Membership in this group requires the approval of a City Council resolution authorizing membership in this association. We are recommending that the City of Orono become a member of the Regional Mutual Aid Association. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve resolution authorizing the City of Orono to join the Regional Mutual Aid Association. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR USE OF PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT - REGIONAL MUTUAL AID ASSOCIATION BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Orono, as follows; WHEREAS, the City of Orono desires to become a member of the Regional Mutual Aid Association and its Public Services Director is its authorized representative, and; Public Works Superintendent its alternative representative, and; WHEREAS, a mutual need exists between members of the Regional Mutual Aid Association to share and assist one another in the areas of emergency, disaster control, and mitigation, and; WHEREAS, the City of Orono considers it to be in the best interests of the City to enter into a mutual agreement with the otlier members of the Regional Mutual Aid Association. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Orono enter into agreement with the Regional Mutual Aid Association and hereby authorizes its Public Services Director to represent the City of Orono in this association and the Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to sign said agreement in behalf of said City of Orono. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF ORONO THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY, 1998. ATTESTED: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Lake Minnetonka A rea Cooperating Cities ^ - -Chanhats^n, Daaphavtn, Excalalor, Mlnnatonka* MInnatonka B#ach« Mlnnatrlata, Mound, Orono, Shorawood, Spring Park,*-''Tonka Bay, Victofta, Wayiata, Woodland and Long Lakt____________ ^J'JL I / i593 Date:July 16.1998 Public Works Subcommittee, cc: Steering^mmlltee CITYGrC/.C;;o From:Terry Kaysl ice of Local Assistance Subject:Regional Mutual Aid (public works) Little Details At the July 15“* meeting of the Public Works Subcommittee, John Flora from the city of Fridley provided information relative to a region>wide mutual aid association for public works departments. I've enclosed the materials he distributed, which covers a lot of the things he had to say. However, the group talked about the advantages of membership in a group such as this. Perhaps on of the biggest was the fact that being region-wide there exists the potential to obtain more equipment for emergency purposes. Another advantage is that sometimes storms can affect subregions like the LMACC cities but not those further away —making it impossible to et necessary help from a neighbor but going across town to find the help that ’s needed. Membership requires three things: a singed resolution by each city council agreeing to participate, a list of equipment and personnel contacts, and an annual $10 fee to cover some of the administrative costs (typing, mailing, etc.) John said that once cities are members, the hardest part is getting the $10 per yearl The LMACC did an inventory of equipment several years ago and a few cities gave me an update earlier this month, so that information is readily available. Members in attendance generally thought that this was a good thing and would look into it on an individual basis. (Wayzata, Minnetonka and Hennepin County are presently members.) Look over the materials and call John Flora if you have any questions, 572-3550. Larry Brown of Shorewood asked about any interest in sharing contacts (names and phone numbers) fci some of the details that need to be handled in situations like the storm damage clean-up. Larry is willing to coordinate pulling this list together. Call him at 474-3236 to share your information and he’ll compile and return it (seven-fold) to you. Dave Dudinsky of Wayzata and I will be sending out a survey we've been asked to pull together on generators, connectors etc. for that Hennepin County/subregional Lake Minnetonka mutual aid group. When you get it. please complete it and return it to me so I can enter the information into a data base. Next month: We're scheduled to have Lou Howard at the August 12*’' meeting. 9:30 a.m. at Deephaven (really). See you there. r CONSTITUTION AND BYLAWS OF THE REGIONAL MUTUAL AID ASSOCIATION (November 16,1989) ARTICLE I. Name and Purpose 1. 2. 3. The political subdivisions which are parties to the "Joint and Cooperative Agreement for Use of Personnel and Equipment during Emergencies" (the "Agreement"), providing for mutual assistance among public works departments, shall be known collectively as the "Regional Mutual Aid Association" (the "Association”). The purpose of the "Association" shall be to assist one another in an emergency, to exchange ideas of equipment and methods of dealing with emergencies, to protect lives and property of our respective areas in the case of any emergency or disaster, and to provide other types of mutual assistance in accordance with the "Agreement". The intent of these bylaws is to establish procedures through which the representatives of members of the "Association" can organize and coordinate their efforts to provide mutual assistance. ARTICLE n. Membership 1. Membership in the "Association" shall refer to public works departments or the equivalent. 2. Any city or county public works department in the area that can be of reciprocal service to the other members of the "Association" may become a member of the "Association" by signing the "Agreement", subject to the approval of a simple majority of the members of the "Association". ARTICLE m. Coordination 1. The Coordinator of the "Association" shall perform the following duties: a.Maintain a current list of all members of the "Association", including names, addresses, and telephone numbers of contact persons for each member department. b. Maintain a current list of members* equipment, and annually distribute that list to each member. c.. 11/96 Maintain records of the activities of the "Association". Annually give notice of the "Association’s" annual meeting. Page 1 Bylaws of the RMAA Page 2 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Public Works Director ot the City of Fridley shall serve as Coordinator of the AssMiation unless and until a successor Coordinator is designated as provided in Section Of D6lOW* Each member shall pay $10.00 on January 31 of each year to the member city or county currently desisted to provide the services of the Coordinator, as reimbursement for the costs of providmg those services. The^blic Works Rector of the City of Bloomington shall serve as Chairman at the annual meeting, unless and until a successor chairman is designated as provided in Section 6, below. The members of the "Association" by a majority vote at a regular or special meeting may designate a successor Coordinator or Chairman. The Coordinator and Chairman so s^STmee^^^ * successor is again designated by majority vote at a regular or The members of the "^sociation" by a majority vote at a regular or special meeting may amend the fee established by Section 3. Any other amendment to these Bylaws shall reouire a two-thirds vote of all the members of the "Association", and must first be proposed in writing to the members at a regular meeting. ARTICLE V. Meetings 1. ■ae r^Iar meeting of the "AssocUtion shaU be held in November of each year, at a time and place determmed by the Coordinator and Chairman. 2. Special meetings shall be called by the Chairman with at least seven days' notice to the membership. 3. 4. 5. 6. A majority of the membership shall constitute a quorum. Roberts Rules of Order shall govern. Each member shall have one vote. The purpose of meetings of the "Association" shall be to provide an opportunity for discussion of the procedures through which members provide assistance to each other and ways to improve those procedures and to correct problems that may have been encountered, and to share information about public works equipment and procedures. The members may adopt recommenda tions to the city councils of the member cities and counties for amendments to the Agreement’ that may be necessary or advisable to better serve the purposes of the "Agreement". 11/96 Page 2 r f f COUNCIL MEETING JUL 2 7 1998 CrTYOrORONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: July 27, 1998 ITEM NO.: /1 Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Agenda Section: Administrator ’s Report This item has been removed from consideration at this meeting and will be placed on a future Council agenda. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: No Council action requested. ! r COUNCIL MEETIN JUL 2 7 1998 cmroFCRONo REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: July 24,1998 ITEM NO: / f Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Adminbtrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Preliminary Review of Amendment to Industrial Zoning District In March of 1998, the Council placed a moratorium on development in the City's industrial zone to provide an opportunity to develop a new industrial ordinance to refocus the industrial area toward low impact uses compatible with the residential area to the south and the planned office park to the north. The moratorium will expire on September 15. The amended industrial zoning district is to replace the City's current industrial zoning district language which covers the City's existing industrial zone east of Old Crystal Bay Road and south of Highway 12. The new zoning district would also be used if the property in the southwest quadrant of Highway 12 and Old Crystal Bay Road were to be rezoned to light industrial. It is staffs goal to have a new industrial ordinance in place at the time the moratorium expires. Staff has developed a draft ordinance that will be finalized for review at the August 17 Planning Commission meeting so that it can be adopted at either the August 24 or September 14 Council meeting. The draft ordinance is being provided to the Council at this time for preliminary review to determine if there are concerns or issues that need to be addressed prior to the draft being finalized for Planning Commission review. The property owners in the industrial area are interested in how this ordinance might affect the use of their properties, particularly VCI Capital (please see the attached letter from Steve White of VCI Capital). Changes Reflected in the Proposed Amendment The following are the most significant changes reflected in the proposed industrial zone amendment. 1.Eliminates the list of spiecific types of uses in favor of a more general description of low impact uses. 2. Eliminates heavy manufacturing-type uses as permitted or conditional uses. 3.Adds heavy manufacturing as an interim use on those properties v.ith existing structures equipped for heavy manufacturing, subject to low impacts and conditions which the City may place on the use. 4. Eliminates warehousing without an office or wholesale showroom component. Request for Council Action continued Page 2 July 24,1998 Preliminary Review of Amendment to Industrial Zoning District 5.Eliminates pre-fmished metal materials as allowed construction materials for structures in the district. 6. Eliminates outside storage. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: At this time the Council may want to: 1. Provide staff with comments regarding the ordinance. 2. Schedule a work session (with the Planning Commission?) prior to the August Planning Commission meeting. 3. Schedule a work session after the August Planning Commission meeting. U^SMV. ----------------------------------Mr- 1 C —Drugs, eo8mctiC9, pharmaceutical and toilctnegT ID* 1 r■........ lo. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------—Ice and eeld atoragc pltmte; bottling workg? § 10.50 Shoes and footwcafr Sporting equipment. vision, radio and applionccar wft metal products. Warehousing. ■Conditional Uses. of the fellu>,i,.e rl'Jll) UUI.UL •Aeeessoiy stnicturcs. 4r equipment soles, repair and storage r ■ticliports as an accessor)' use for that propcity- ■^lotor fuel stations. ■ •Open soles lots. ^^earch laboratories. height houscsr ^.......... - I' I 'linthnl"ii...... Phmned Industrial Dijtiict as regulated-by Section 10.51. Ordinance No. 172 -f niii?i......^ ..iUtuuiciiiM ............ U.UUU.U itnieturc. hwnccNo. 177 Any QCCC330W nm nn ^ »q j ■■■ § 10.50 S£C, 10,50. I-l. LIGHT TNDUSTRTAr. niSTpfPT distnct shall \k liimted to thofig whigh gan gompatiblv exist adjacent to both lower infpndtv Kniinn-f ^.gs and residgntia^ dgvg oprngm. and whjgh havg limitgd amounts of truck traffic in rnmp.n>^n l- r residential !^.!!!/ yju Sgtbacks. landsgaping. loading and use typ ?. so as to gomoatlbllitv between these uses and residential Hpvp1npn^>>Pl Egrmittgd Usgs. The following are pyrr nitted uses wi'thin fin f-1 n/^^vto- u ^ Manafagtunog br assgmblv of a wide variety of products that pmHnrp mgx gnor ^isg, vibrahQn. glare, forngs. obnoNious products byproducts nr wastes, nr rrp;»t^Q nth^r Qfelggtionablg impact on the environment FvamDles of snrh uses arp' .■ecronic ..edicl 2t Printing and puhlishiqg, _ ... Essgmial sgrvjggs and structures, excent those requiring admini^traf.-v»permits or conditional use nermit<; ^ Qtn.rfnr^c * I ^P^^fOnigntal and pablic utility ressemial serviced huildinps anHStrygtUres. including public works type facilities. DL Laboratories. <50^ nerr.n, nf,h. prin^n.l Wndilignal MSgf! flimiH |n HR y .vM ^ Qffigg/warghoasg gxcludinp explosives and h;i7arrin,.^ f,n^ g2Lglti(Jing dismbatlbn ggntgrs; with a minimum of 20% oFthe Poor area devoted fo ntrir^ nc^ fit .Wholesale showrnofns, , fionditional Usgs. Thg fpllowinr are conditional in^es in nn t.i nktnVt ano require a conditional u.se perpiit, ^ fipniniergial and professional Offlres within the prinrip.ql structure in § 10.50 excess of that which is allowed in this district or as a freestanding principal use. B. Day care facilities, accessory to an allowed use. Essential seryices and structures requiring a conditional use permit. D. Office/warehouse excluding explosiyes and hazardous materials, and excluding distribution centers: with a minimum of 10% of the floor area deyoted to office use. El Planned Industrial District as regulated by Section 10.51. El Accessory uses. Subd. 4. Interim Uses. Subject to applicable proyisions of this Chapter, the following are interim uses in the 1-1 District and are goyemed by Section of this Chapter. A. For those properties with existing structures and equipment necessary for heavy manufacturing, heavy manufacturing uses may be allowed on an interim basis subject to conditions to be placed on the use bv the City to ensure the use is compatible with adjacent business, light industrial, and residential land uses. Among these conditions is the requirement that the use produces no exterior noise, vibration, glare, fomes. obnoxious products, byproducts or wastes, and does not create other objectionable impact on the environment. Subd. 5. Area, Height, Setback and Design Requirements. A. Lot Area. The minimum lot size shall be two acres, B. Building Area. Each individual building shall have a gross floor area (not including basements) of not less than 5,000 square feet when designed for a single tenant nor less than 15,000 square feet when designed for multi-tenants. C Lot Coverage. Not more than 30% of the total area of any lot, tract or parcel of land three acres or less in size may be covered by buildings or other structures. Not more than 45 35% of the total area of any lot, tract or parcel of land more than three acres in size may be covered by buildings or other structures, exce pt that when the total building floor area on a site is eentemed within o single building;-and when the total area used for loading terminals, docks and bertha is completely enclo3cd -within-the-9amc-8tngle-buildng-, o-lot coverage of-not more than 60% will be permitted. D. Height. No structure or building shall exceed three stories or 40 feet in height^,-cxec pt oa provided in Section 10.75; E. Building Setback and Yards. § 10.50 1. Street Setbacks. All buildings and structures must be set back at least 75 feet from the right-of-way of any highway or street which has been designated as limited access, freeway or expressway; and 50 feet from those designated as thoroughfares, collectors, minor or secondary streets. Where the district abuts or adjoins an "R" District there shall be a building setback from that street of not less than 75 feet. 2. Side Yards or Rear Yards. Any building or structure required by any building code adopted by the City to have openings in the rear wall, shall be erected no closer than 30 feet to a rear property line. Where rear wall openings are not required by any such code, and the rear w^l has no openings, buildings or structures may be constructed to within 10 feet of a rear property line. No building or structure shall be erected any closer to a side property line than a distance equal to one and one-half times the average building height. Where the district abuts or adjoins an "R" District, the side or rear yard abutting such residential district shall be not less than 100 feet. ^ ^ Building Design and Construction. The addition to-othcr restrictions Chapter, the use, eonstmction;' alteration or enlargements to any building or stnietufc within the district shall meet the following standards; All exterior wall finishes on any building shall be; (a)-----Face brick; or,— ^----Natural atone, or. Specially dcfligncd precast concrete units if the surfaces have been integrally treated with an applied decorative material of texture; or,---------------------- ------Factory fabricated and finished metal -framed panel conatruction, if the panel materials be of any of those noted in Items (a), (b) and (e) above;' glas97 prefinished mctol (other than unpaintcd galvanized iron) of plastic; provided that if any wall of the buildmg or structure faces a street or abuts an "R” Diatriet, then that wall shall have at least one*third of its surface of materials other than profinishcd ractal'and the remaining walls shall have at least onc’fifth of their surfaces of materials other than prefinished metal; or, -------------------------- ~ ~ ■ (c)-----Other materials as may be approved by the Council. Combinations of such materials shall be permitted. ~ All subsequent additions and outbuildings constructed after the erection of on original building or buildings shall be constructed of materials comparable to those used in the original construction and shall ^ designed in a manner confomiing with the original architectural design and general appearance. No- building or structure of a temporary eharactcf, trarler; basement, tent or shack shall be constructed, placed or maintained upon the property except as accessory to and during the construction of permanent buildings. L. Architectural Standards. All structures within the district shall be § 10.50developed in accordance with the following design standards: Ij. Architectural plans shall be prepared bv a registered architect and include: H elevations of all sides of the building: 2) type and color of exterior building materials: 3) a typical floor plan and dimensions of all structures: 4’> location of trash containers. heating, air conditioning and ventilation systems: S’) proposed screening of trash containers, heating, air conditioning and ventilation systems. 2x Seventy-five percent. (75%). of the exterior building finish shall consist of material comparable in grade and quality to the following: 1 ) face brick: 2^ natural stone: 3^ glass: 4^ specially designed precast concrete units if the surfaces have been integrally treated with an applied decorative material or texture: S’) rock face. Wood, stucco, vinvl. metal, plastic or a combination of all these materials, shall not comprise more than twentv-five percent. t25%V of a building's exterior finish. G. Off-Street Parking. In addition to other restrictions of this Chapter, off-street parking areas of sufficient size to provide parking for patrons, customers, suppliers, visitors and employees shall be provided on the premises of each use. Parking areas shall be surfaced with a hard, all-weather, durable, dust-free surfacing material and shall be properly drained and landscaped, and shall be maintained in a- sightiy and well-kept condition. No parking area shall occupy any required setback except on lots, tracts, or parcels having two or more street frontages. On lots, tracts, or parcels having two or more street frontages, 50% of the required setback from one of the streets, designated as a thoroughfare, collector, minor, or secondary street and not adjoining a residential district, may be occupied for parking purposes only; provided, however, that parking shall not be located within the required setback area in front of the building. No parking shall be located closer than ten feet to a side or rear lot line, nor closer than ten feet to any building. Each parking space shall have a minimum width of nine fet’* juid a minimum depth of twenty feet exclusive of aisles and maneuvering space. All parking areas cortaining more than six spaces which face either a public street or residentially zoned property shall h.: . c a solid wall or fence of not less than four feet nor more than six feet in height along such facing. Such fences or walls shall be so designed that they are architecturally harmonious with the principal structures on the lot. A screen planting approved by the Council may be substituted for the required wall or fence. H. Loading Facilities. In addition to other restrictions of this Chapter, all loading or unloading into or out of trucks in excess of three-fourths ton capacity or railroad cars, shall be conducted at facilities specifically designed and designated for that purpose. Those facilities, hereby designated as "loading facilities", shall be subject to the following regulations: 1 . Amount Required. Loading facilities of sufficient number to provide for the requirements of each use shall be provided on the premises of each principal and accessory use. The exact number required will depend on the nature of the principal and accessory § 10.50 1 ! i loading raciZ '^ZZL'T'^ docks shall be located XTSwt^e hS'T "’■" »'«*>. All they shall be completely enclosed exceot for the nn fusing Ae principal or accessory use and time it is standing in the bei^ All be^hs shall ^ .r"® "!t r ^ ''chicle during the frontages by a soL wall of !Joi less en f M I u street they are architecturally harmonious with the nrincirlll ^ f Such walls shall be so designed that than 500/c of the requireS^r of U^ck T T less length, 14 feet in width and 15 feet in heieht All truck be surfaced with a hard, all-weather durable Hn areas shall maintained in a sightly alid well-kept’conditioi ' material properly drained and on a street within the required side or rear yLs All tet^^shTte nh^ ” off-street parking except for conn"^^^^^^^^ within ten feet of a side or rear proper^ line. ^ ^ maneuvering area shall be located I. raw a materials, supplies, finished or semi-rinisheH ^ restrictions of this Chapter, all ra completely enclosed buildint?: nnhnl lir . P^^ equipment shall be stored within „ and not Icjj than S0% opaque; provided ho^^^^ ^"7° i ***“‘^** the Princi^^ motor vehicles necessary to the operation of parking areas. three-fourths ton capacity may be stored within the permitted graded to provide proper drainM^Md^evccntl-** r ^hall be landscaped with trees, shrubs or planted ground Zd'*'"®’ ** condition. All vacant lots, tracts or parcels shairio that results in water runoff causine floo^r be developed and no use shall be permitted drainage plans shall be submitted bv the an r ^®Posits on adjacent properties. Site and § 10.50 runoff whether onto adjacent property or otherwise must be in compliance with the Surface Water Management Plan and shall be consistent with other applicable regulations or City Code provisions and subject to the approval of other agencies having jurisdiction over the area affected by the drainage. Source: Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date: 1-1-75 8 X ^AFPS^WPW^N60^WPOOCS^vL'' ''A£SO-OfU>COOi 1050 VCI. capitalw \AU capital, inc. RQ Box 37S« Long Lake, MN 55356 •(612)475-2637 June 2,1998 Orono City Council Members Orono Planning Commis^on Members As you may know, VCI Capital is a major landowner in Orono’s Industrial zone. We own the corner property on the southeast side of Highway 12 and Old Crystal Bay road, which includes the industrial building where Drop Ship Express is located. The current moratorium placed on this property and the propos^ rezoning obviously have a large impact on us as property owners. I would like to take this opportunity to express our views to the Council and Planning Commission members as you consider this property and the future use of it. Ite <>rder to understand our approach to this issue, we ask that you understand a bit about is and our presence in this community. VCI Capital is the successor companyVanDalc Companies, which my father, Robert White, purchased in 1963. At that time awi acquired the industrial property in question. VanDale was a farm equipment manufacturer operating out of the same industrial building that is now located on the property. For almost twenty years our family owned and ran VanDale. During that liiue we made substantial investments into the community and our property. Not only have we provided many jobs in the community over the years, but we have also provided a very substantial tax base for the last 35 years. In 1997 alone our family paid approximately $125,000 in property taxes to the community. As well as being industrial landowners, we are also residents of the community. My father has lived in the community and owned his residence here for 34 years. My brother also lives in Orono, as will myself and my family in the spring. We are not just concerned about what happens in the community from a business standpoint, but also as residents. In 1982 we sold VanDale to a minority partner, but we retained ownership of the real estate. Unfortunately the new owr^er of VanDale was unable to keep the business afloat in a very tough farm economy and the company went out of business in 1996. We now find ourselves with a 133,(X)0 square foot building which we have invested in for 35 years for which we need to find tenants to occupy the vacant space. We have been able to attract and keep Drop Ship Express as a tenant, however we still have approximately half of out building vacant. The expense to us of this much vacant space is around $200,000 per year. Obviously we need to lease the remainder of our building as quickly as possible. Our building was designed and built as a manufacturing building with high ceilings, heavy floors and overhead cranes. The vast majority of tenants who will have an interest in our building will be manufacturing companies. In my conversations with the city planner he has indicated that Orono would like to rezone our property to ofiBce services, or medical or light manufacturing. Our concern with this is that our building is not suited to those types of operations. Moreover, in the last two years since we have had vacant space in the building, we have not been approached by prospective tenants looking for that type of space. If this type of rezoning were to occur, we would be left with a building that we could not lease without substantial renovation and investment, amounting to a reconstruction. The impact to us of that situation would be tremendous. In addition to the potential impact of a rezoning, the current moratorium placed on our property is already having a serious impact on us. The moratorium not only prevents us firom using the property in ways it has historically been used, but it also prevents us from signing a lease over three years with any tenant. It is difficult, if not impossible, to find tenants who want to invest in a move and a different building when you can only sign a three year lease with them, particularly with the restricted uses imposed on the property. We have met with knowledgeable real estate professionals to discuss the impact of the moratorium and proposed rezoning on our property. What they are telling us is that it will be very difficult to lease our space with the moratorium in place. They are also telling us that if the property is rezoned as contemplated, it will be next to impossible to attract tenants who will meet the new criteria. It appears that the effect of rezoning would be to essentially make our building worthless and cost us up to $500,000 per year in lost revenues. As residents of the community we understand the desire to have a community in which we all enjoy living. And we desire to work with the city to accomplish that in whatever way possible. We recently very happily granted the city an easement across our property for a new bike path, and we support such efforts to improve our community. We do however ask that you carefully consider the impact a rezoning could have on us and other property owners. We have made a substantial investment in our industrial property. We have made this investment in good faith to the community and its zoning regulations. If we were .fitting with bare land in which we wished to invest, we would be happy to make that investment in office service buildings, or whatever was currently desirable by the community, but our investment has been made, over the last 35 years. We have talked with developers about leveling the current building and redeveloping, and to date have found no one interested in doing that for anything other than retail, and I do not think retail at this location is what is desired by the community. If we could find someone who was interested in undertaking the coit of converting the property to the desired use, we would be delighted. L We feel that we have been good responsible members of the community for the last 35 years. And we have made our investment into our property and developed it in accordance with the zoning regulations. Unfortunately the building we have developed and invested in is not suited to the proposed rezoning. As I stated before, the impact to us of this proposed rezoning, and the current moratorium, is very great. I would like to ask that you carefully conuder that as you make plans for the future use of our property. I would welcome the opportunity to discuss this with the council and planning commisnon members. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or woidd like to understand our thoughts further. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Steven C. White VCI Capital City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55323 Phone: (612) 473-7357 Fax: (612) 473-0510 MEMORANDUM DATE:July 23, 1998 TO:Mayor Jabbour and Orono City Council Members FROM: Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Industrial District Analysis Descripti( The Industrial District in the City of Orono is bounded by Wayzata Boulevard (Hwy. 12) on the north, Old Crystal Bay Road on the west, the Burlington Northern railroad on the south and the city boundary between Orono and Long Lake on the east.‘ I i The area is approximately 44 acres in size. The structures in the district were constructed between 1957 and 1960. There are six separate tax parcels in the district as shown in table 1.I Table 1-Ownership by Parcel Owners Address PIN Taxable Market Total Tax Lot Area Du!*'’.e Jacobs 2687 WB (0002)$350,400 $15,748.02 2 acres Veda Inc.2765 WB (0011)S 178,400.00 $8,361.36 4 acres Veda Inc.450CX:B (0012)$ 454,700.00 $21,190.462.25 acres Veda Inc.no address (0013)$ 40,000.00 $2,087.20 2.76 acres Veda Inc.1115'm (0014)$ 973,000.00 $48,233.58 9.09 acres Washington Scientiflc 2605 WB (0015)$3,042,000.00 $142,087.80 24 acres 6 parcels, 3 owners $5.03 million $237,708.42 44 acres Key: WB= Wayzau Boulevard OCB=Old Crystal Bay Road Taxable Market Value The six parcels in the district have a total taxable market value of $5.03 million. The total tax, based on the 1998 Hennepin County tax book dated February 1998, indicated a total tax of $237,708.42. Uses Five of the six parcels have structures. The current companies in the district are Washington Scientific, Flamingo Wire, and Drop Ship Express. The comer property at Wayzata Boulevard and Old Crystal Bay Road is owned by Veda and is considered a legal, non-conforming residential use. Ownership The largest landholder in the district is Washington Scientific (WSI). WSI owns approximately 24 acres. The building occupies almost 4 acres. Veda controls 18.1 acres of the industrial district. There are two warehouse-type buildings on Veda's property at 450 Old Crystal Bay North and 2725 Wayzata Boulevard. The 2725 property is leased to Drop Ship Express. Issu^ Land Availability There is land that is unoccupied by structures along the southern edge of the industrial district, north of the Burlington Northern railroad and future location of the Highway 12 bypass. The vacant land could be replatted and separated from the existing lots for future development.. Access Access to the four properties along Wayzata Boulevard is currently provided by three driveways. Access is also available to the vacant land from Old Crystal Bay Road. The comer property has access from Old Crystal Bay Road. Future access to the interior and rear of the district could be provided by a new road that parallels or is adjacent to the rail line. This road could serve the 14 acres that are vacant north of the rail line. There have been previous discussions regarding construction of an east/west road to connect to Daniels Street in Long Lake. Storm Water Ponding The state Department of Transportation (MNDOT) has indicated that when the new Hwy. 12 bypass is constructed, improvements will be made along existing Hwy. 12. MNDOT has initially indicated that they desire to locate a stormwater retention pond in the area, possibly on the south side of existing Hwy. 12. A future stormwater retention pond may impact future development of the southerly portion of the industrial district and the layout for a service road to Daniels Street. City Services The industrial district is served by city water and sanitary sewer as shown in the Exhibits. ZfiniDS The current zoning district allows uses that may not be compatible with future development or redevelopment. A moratorium was adopted on May 11, 1998 to allow for the City to study the industrial district and propose a new use list for permitted and conditional uses. Staff is also working on reviewing the site planning requirements to ensure that future development j compatible with the surrounding area. EXHIBITS A B C D E Zoning Map Parcel Map Inventory Tax Info Sewer Map TAOC JNfi I • ! ;:/V* - ^ . ,./•••• '•> •> ' uti^'>"'yyy!''‘ - nort TAHPAVflllMW/ADlMCSS .......... ,. .NRTeS AND BOUNDS ‘ \ IttSHZMmM SCXENnm 1M» :• NAstuNDTON sczmnnc znd .. s t (E/LOAN ff AODZnON NAME ' ' E8CMN NANE/ADDRESS . ! : ACREAGE SCH NTR SEN PROPERTY ADDRESS • ■’ • • DSr SHD DST LOT DIJK'. PUT PARCEL . PROPERTY Z.D. ‘.■••••V • ."'-SN'TNP • ', r A V” ORONO INDUSTRIAL PARK 000.00 E78 S STATUSt CURRENT I •• # • . • * •* * ' POB0KS40'‘' LONB LAKE NN ".SBSM " LOTS 1 THRU IE ZNCL. sue 1 ORONO ■ INOSUTRZAL PARK XNCL ADJ VAC ROAD ALSO E 4«0.S FT W N 94. RODS OF S X/E OF NB '1/4 OF SEC SS TXIS RES EXCEPT . ROAD ALSO EXCEPT PARCEL EOS AS SHO»M ON HN/DOT PUT NO E7-B1 TAXASU MARKET S»04E»400 OUALXFYXND ANT .00 DZVXSXON NO NET TAX CAPACITY. . . 110>9XS . FD SHARED TC . S0»640 DZVXSXON DATE E605 . 4ESS0 NAYZATA SLVD N • SS-118-ES IS OOlS . f - ■. • •. r-. • >» . . CONSTRUCTION YEAR 19S7 ,5 m • y MOTS 12/M . • • . ■ • i * *: * ■ *. XP MOJ AKT • t I • PO AfICA RATE ZP PROJECT m. 155.0020 SEE ZD S SS-118-2S IS 0001 SS-118-2S IS 0009 % •» t TAX LEVY/DESCRXPnON HMSTBPRTYP RATE NON-MMESTEAO GROSS TX NX X19.E700 --------------------- • .• -sA.nsoI STATS PAXO AXO . SOUD NASTE FEE ' NON<4MSTO.OR TX/CONTAH N Z .0000 •. > . • . TOTAL TAX «• r -.. TOTAL PAXO.10 O AMOUNT XTOylSO.Ol S7.400.S0CR S59.79 . S»OEa.OO. ' 14E>OS7.SO .00 ' LAND ■' S4S>E00 E»E57»e00 SS'XIS'ES IS 0010 SLOG . , MACH ONNX SASEl ‘ DASEE NHDASE NWMiBT. , 4*OSO . 9S»040 . *. 60»S00 saifioo OfSES CONnOUOUS AMT UNPAID X4E»007.S0 - ~ L .j. •«. < VEDA VEDA LONS TAXAI NET. IF PI t J t * ;\ f» . . .J f-i V:: • -• ■ I ♦• .! • * s ONinuaiB • . .• . ••. * • • * . ' ’ . ’ • • * . •*•*’♦•*•./ i’ * • *1 '•*’rI **'J*’‘ • » •* .‘V / V V V ’•• *'.> * • * ‘ . . . • / •/ *•*, • ■ . • ‘ ... • •; ’•*; .»•* i;’ .VC.l_'»,'; •■'•• :■ -•'•gyim HMIP/ftffPff*** • .! ACREilOe 8CH HTR SOI PROPIRTY ADDRESS . , SM TIO R» flS SUPXv., ^ .* .TAXPAYER NANE/AOORESS *■ ‘ METES AtB BOUNDS ■'*:•■■ ■•• ' . VEOA’INe . VEDA nc '• •• \ • PO BOM ITS . . • UMB tAKl Ml SnM TAXABU MARKET addition NAME. ACREAOE 8CM NTR SEN PROPERTY ADDRESS DST SHO DST n S. Ta. :p 1 %• VAN DALE ADDITION .000.00 E78 S STATUSi CURRENT EAOS ' ‘ MAYZATA BLVD N OOS 001 A3B1S Aoioo SS>11S-ES IS OOU CONSTRUCTION YEAR 0000 NET. TAX CAPACSTV. •* M > ZP PROJ ANT 40*000 • OUAUPYZNB ANT ItiOO ‘ PO SNARED TC FO AREA RATE TP PROJECT NO. .00 • 470iss.oazo OZVXSZON NO ' OXVZSZON DATE SEE 10 S \ A TAX LEVY/DE8CRIPTX0N HKSTDPRTYP ’. RATE NON-NOHESTEAO OROSS TX N LC 11P.E700 STAT7 PAID AZO . 54.71S0 MlUO NASTE' PEE • TOTAl TAX TOTAL, PAID . AMOUNT t»*«7.E4 B07.40CR 7.S4 k»OB7.tO ,, .00- . LAND 40*000 BLOO ANT UNPAID t*0B7.20 ■ ’'v' .. ... * V • • i . *..—p- -- m* «».V* t ' * *% • , *• *, •V *•** _y' •.•••■ *•’ . )'••-,•• ."HORT CODE/’LOAN TAMVAVn ' ESCMN NAHE/AOORESS ‘TAM»AVf R NANi/AODReSS METES AND BOUNDS AOOXTXON NAME ACREAGE SCH NTR SEN OSr SHO DST » )• , • • • * • • •■ •. t,. . • ■'. (• • .* ‘ V'v'*v-• V.'V* >•••. y‘‘i' LOT BIX PLAT PARCEL • PROPERTY.^ PROPERTY ADDRESS .•' . .‘ SN TMP RG RQ 8WXm wrn->‘.' > *^«DA XNC VEDA XNC PO BOK STS • . UNS LAKE fffi ■'' SBSBA •. ! > •.*■■- , ■ • ' • I. ■ 1 •; •. . • ¥i** DALE •ADDITION 000.00 E78‘ S STATUSi CURRENT E7E5 OOA 001 4S515 aOOO SS-11B>ES U 0014 HAYZATA BLVD H . - - -—JCONSTRUCTION. YEAR 19M •.* • $ •XP.PRW'AKr'tvy':->i'^ .«««CT NO.'.. V •. , . • ■. I.' .■ W,. •>'-.v TAX LEVY/OESCRIPTXflM HM5TDPRTYP RATE.. AMOWT NDN-NONnTEAO GROSS TX. N X STATE PAID AID ' . 54,7110 IS.ST*.?^ SOLXO NASTE PEE ; ' * • •• T»"' Ol . ^ TOTAL TAX . , 'TOTAL PAID •. • I • • •. . . . . . . . . ..* •» > • *> ^- -:• " DIVISION NO DXVXSXON DATS SEE ID S . . • * .* LAND UO»SOO : DLDO SlEfTOO • • . • . * . I • • ’ ; * * • • •. • • • . • * . • • • • ■ G- ' kl* 4 .. .••: :• r. i y> i- *• ^‘S ^ liftru raajfir wtAsrt 'BASRA MBASE • NON-HNST''^.-^7:'HACH OlfC; BASEl BASES IWBASE • N0M:4BW 4.050 •. .SX.TtO '% • •* ■ • 4a/?ss.sa • 'iV •• *• ' . • . • *• ^ %•. •• ? ANT UNPAID -,‘.4B|ESS.5B .1 . .. .... • • .•.•/•.<■ ••.' • . .. ■. . .* s- .-._.jL-y J J OMCII' • V TAXPAVIII MAMI/AOIMCSS WTtS AND BOUNDS NOBT COOe/UMN • CSCRON NANE/AOORCSS ADDITION NAHE .1. LOT BLK PLAT PARCEL PROPERTY T B ACREAM 8CH NTR SEN. PROPERTY'aDDRESS , . 8N TNP M^Rq'sumDST 8HD DST A VEDA'lNe' vex CAPITAL INC . PO BON STB LONB LAKB .IM ‘ BSSM TAXABU HARKET' i ■ • RM»700 . • • • I t • • M van dale addition . 000.00 E78 S : STATUSi CURRENT OOE 001 4SB1B 4000 SS*ixS*ES IS OOlt OLD CRYSTAL BAY RO N NET TAX CAPACITY « *• IP PMJ ANT • • BUALXPYINB ANT X«»ESB TO SHARED TC n AREA RATE ' IF PROJECT NO. 1 ' •!. . .CONSTRUenON YEAR IWO -V.• • • j-' ‘.V-'.' rr • .* • -'i '• • . • . . • •• '.1 i - .' ;• .00 ' 4»B58 xss.oato DIVISION NO DIVXSXON DATE SEE ID S • I f . # . / TAX LIW/DCBCRXPTXON* HNSTDPRTYP RATE NON-IIONESTIAO cross.TX . N X- 119.E700 STATE PAID AID * • St^TlSO aOLXO NASTE FEE ■ ' TOTAL TAX • TOTAL PAID • •• . ANOUNT . E7»0M.E6. fi»M1.45CR 83.«« Xl»190.4« «00 ‘ LAND 4A>100 • •» . DLDO 408*400 NACH OHNI BASEl BASER . NHBASE NON-HNST 4*060 IE»XBB • .» • • •» . . f’ * ANT. UNPAID 11*190.44 .* I •% • • • • . Y • 4 % . !, '.V*’ '* ; • .* • MOtT CODt/LOAN t TAWAYfR NMC/ABMIESS > ’ ESCMH NMC/AOORESS : MTES AND BigUNOS . ADDITION NAME I • • . !• •; LOTDUC ACAEAOt 8CH HTR SEN PROPERIY ADDRESS DST Sm DST ' PUT • PARCEL PROPERTY I.D.‘ ' . • *. SN TNP RO-QQ sun?: • •v‘-'*v • VEDA INC ETAL VEDA XNC . PO DON STB LOND LAKE NN BSSM .. . SUBJECT TO ROAD TAXABLE HARKET 178«400 VAN DALE ADDITION . 000.00 E70 S STATUSi CURRENT E765 001 001 4551S EOOO S3-11S>E3 IS 0011 NAYZATA BLVD N ‘ . mm* ; • • I / (TRUCnON YEAR 1950 qUALIFYINO AMT NET TAX CAPACITY IP PROJ AMT .B>Z«7 . FO SHARED TC . ' FD AREA RATE IP PROJECT NO. .00 1*052 . US.0020 DIVISION NO DIVISION DATE SEE ID S ••* . . • • • . ■ TAX LEW/DESCRXPnON MMSTBPRTYP RATE "MOM MONttTEAB OROSS TX M C 119.2700 STATE PAID AID ' SA.71S0. , SOLID NASTE PEE ' 'MOMpNOMBSTEAD SROSS TX N R 119.2700 STATE PAID AXb - SA.71S0 14190 1997 DSLINQ UnLZTIES TOTAL TAX ‘ TOTAL PAID .» ■ -.AMOUNT S»041.09 1»290.02CR • S2.02 2*731.25 442.04CR 1*449.04 8*341.34 .00 ■ LAND , 24*200 BLOO 41*700 MACH CNNX BASEl BASE2 NHBASE NQN-RHST > 3*514 CONnOUDUS S2 ‘*C00 68*500 1*425 • •i AMT UNPAID • 8*341.34 ... .1 MM OATB OC/M/96 OMER TAMRAVtR MMM/AOKttSS MmS AND BOUNDS HCtMEPXN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM 1990 TAX BOOK 30 ORONO • "'ISM 5? H! *“ VS'!?* DST SHO DST -.V.•_ » : • tMPLATTED, SS 110 ZS OOE.IZ Z7B 5 STATUS!'CURRENT MMNE-R.tMCODS■' ' J/" :DUANI'R-JACOBS .• • tMB NAVZATA DLVD aSi'Vt fT or ™>T »«r or s Of NE tviNo H or » aos.os THOP EXCEPT ROAD i TAXADU MARKET. . 5S0,400 ^ ,ob DIVXSIOM NO ,.*4:* S^SSoTC J.i09 OXVXSIOHOATB|«T«o»»cm ,u,OM rojwi^^ .iss.oom «e»» IP* fOOJ AMT ■ ; * • IP PROJECT HO. **07 . .. MAYZATA DLVD H BUSS **40 SS-1X0>*S A TAX iiVY/OESCRXPnOM NON IMMESTBAB OROSS IX .'J?*™8TAT1 PAID AID SA.TISO SSnSolimAo'aioss T^ h x nonrm uo , : ; • V. TOTAL PAID • / % • »•#* i* ' .* AMOUNT S,914.es 1»50*.S7CR *4.47 14;i99.10 S»I*7.*1CR 16*740.0* .00 LAND 17*000 DLOe 71*700 45*000 *1**700 • • t » * 9 • V. > ■ A .A- • . .. • CONSTRUCnON YEAR IMO . f • . • • • • ■ •.1 • • HtCHOHO! MSOl tUft NW^ pOHnOUOli* 1 • AMT UNPAID 4*060 . ^ •• 16*740.0* 4*4*0 ■ : y.'l-- ; • • A V • • ‘ • • • • r • i 'Khibif (r . ,^3e\MEl2- F0(2. IfODusTCiAc "Pisnaicr COUNCIL MEETING JUL 2 7 1998 CrTYOrCRONO Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Administrator Reviewed: DATE: July 23, 1998 ITEM NO: Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description; New Highway 12 Noise and Vibration Study Update Attachments:1. Letter ftom the City to HDR Dated June 17.1998 Requesting a Proposal for a Noise and Vibration Study 2. Proposal from HDR Dated June 23, 1998 3. Additional Proposal from HDR Dated July 20,1998 uJ^fon'o^ngT^:*^' * by HDR Engineering, Inc. included I.Vibration. 1. Ground-borne vibration modeling at five sites in Orono and Long Lake. 2. Ground-borne vtation assessment to determine potential vibration impacts resulting from the new railroad corridor. 3. Discussion of potential mitigation measures. II.Noise study. 1. Noise monitoring. A. Noise from the traffic on existing highway 12 B. Noise from the Burlington Northern Railroad. 2. Predict future noise levels. 3. Evaluation of bamers as noise mitigation options. Additional Propo-sal u " e>n>erienced by residents ^jacent to fte ratad tracks is most probably caused by low frequency noise rather than by ground- tome vibrauon. Therefore HDR proposed conducting noise monitoring in a way that isoto4 bands lo" ftequency noise is sulTicient to cause the vibration Oronrand L ot T l ^c railroad tracks. This will be done at five sites in aaggested additional monitoring at different distances from the railroad to establish Ltd if^eed"er* *AAAAAAA?AiL I !?i CONFIRMATION REPORT * NAME:CITY OF ORONO^^***'^'^'^'^'^'^^^**^*^^^***^*^***^^****'^** TEL ;6124730510 DATE:06/18/98 07:55 fX ' June 17, 1998 CITY of ORONO Strtfl Mdrvti; 2750 K«N«y Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Municipal Onic< Malliai Adtfran: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 0066 BYFArgfivin,^ HDR Engineering Consultants Chuck OonderlJnger 5401 Oamble Drive Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 RE: VJbration/Noise Study Proposal Dear Mr. Gonderlinger: 3£«uo&o « I. Vibration study. various points •rivc, 'o«t.on .. v.ri, A. Clint Miller’s home at 375 Silver Meadow. • • B. Clark Jenney ’s home at 1 320 Orono Oaks Di C. Several locations in the City of Long Lake. r^iTpotalsIn''option « A. Coal train. B. Double stack intcrmodal train. TalapliPM («M) 47».7357 • FAX 47>«510 r GlTYof ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parlmay Orono. MN 55356 Milling Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 June 17,1998 BY FACS WUHDR Engineering Consultants Chuck Gonderlinger 5401 Gamble Drive Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 RE; Vibralion/Noise Study Proposal Dear Mr. Gonderlinger: The following information is to provide additional direction as you prepare a proposal for a vibration/noise study related to the IBghway 12 corridor in die cities of Orono and Long Lake. I.Vibration study. 1. 2. Current level of vibration caused by the train in its existing location at various points along the proposed Highway 12 corridor. A. Clint Miller’s home at 375 Silver Meadow. B. Clark Tenney's home at 1320 Orono Oaks Drive. C. Several locations in the City of Long Lake. Projected level of vibration caused by the train in its proposed new location at the same points in 1. A. Coal train. B Double stack intermodal train. Telcphoiu (612) 473-7357 • FAX 47^4)510 HDR Engineering Consultants June 17, 1998 Page 2 3, Methods of mitigating train vibration to; A. Maintain vibration at current levels. B. Reduce vibration to more "acceptable" levels. I. Noise study. 1. Current level of noise caused by the train and Highway 12 in their current location at the various points along the corridor listed in I. 2. The projected level of noise from the combination of: A The train in its new location. B. The two lane freeway in its proposed location just north of the railroad tracks. These noise levels are to be measured at the same points as listed m I. 3. Methods of mitigating noise impacts to: A. Maintain noise at current levels. B. Reduce noise to more "acceptable" levels. This information is needed for the City's decision process regarding the Highway 12 preliminary design. It is critical this information be provided as quicWy as possible. Please ® propos that indicates the earliest date by which the information listed above could be provided. • • If you have any questions, please call me. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Greg^ppa Director of Public Services GAG/1 sv ' I June 23,1998 Mr. Greg Gappa Director of Public Services City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Dear Mr. Gappa: KR Thank you for the opportunity to provide this proposal for environmental noise and vibration se^ices which is based on your letter of June 17. HDR proposes to conduct a noise and vibration study of existing conditions, and to predict future noise and vibration condiuons using methodologies published by the Federal Transit AdministraUon and Federal Highway Administration. Project Approach 1. Ground-bom Vibration Study HDR under^ands that the City of Orono wants a vibration study performed on the railroad traffic operations, not on the vehicular traffic on the proposed freeway. HDR propose to use the screening and general vibration assessment methodologies published in the ^A manual. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment These methodologies allow HDR to assess existing and future conditions based on data collected at other locations. Assumptions: • HDR assumes that the ground-borne vibrations caused by < v ,-ains and by double stack intermodal trains are the same, or sufficiently similai. i. " propose to differentiate predicted vibrations from these two trail ^ HDR also^sumes that basic train data (average number of trains pci day, average pro™ide7bi'^OT.'** • This task does not include monitoring or measuring ground-bom vibrations. • Recent aenal mapping will be provided to HDR. Task 1 - Screening Evaluation roi^ill visit the corridor to characterize existing land use within 600 feet of the rail. 3?® V ^ ® screening distance for land uses that are very O e.. concert halls, high-tech research facilities). These are defined ^ VI ^ Uses. A screening Ji^ianoe of 200 feet will be used for residentiaJlMd usw (i.e., houses, apartments, hospitals, etc.). These are defined as Category 2 by the FTA. HDR Engineering, Inc. Emptoyes-ewntd 300 Parkdale 1 Bldg. 5^01 Garribla Driv«'> Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416-1518 Teleptione 612 591-5400 Fax 612 591-5413 mMiTti ItJCtli FsVHiJtUfli]MlUtl MOlUiIfl MiTtitfri •lUKil [•Tilt I niisct ir»TfT« rtiimirti winr»¥«i •Birti rtwiit] rtriWirm [•If tit ^tTt»Itr^¥OXtli ^TtlflTt]•rctiti rtEiirtiiiut rt¥iiitymo Wilt pJiTix.isiVAXTtnimt]OMiItJ ^U^X.TiuXil rtrmoifiiTv R :yj Railroad Noise Assuming MNDOT will supply train traffic data (including daily schedules), HDR proposes to monitor existing railroad traffic noise at the Miller and Jenny residences and Uf to three additional locations along the proposed freeway corridor. If HDR cannot obtain a train schedule, monitoring train noise will be difficult. Under these circumstances, HDR proposes to use measurements of train pass-byes available in the public domain or from previous project experience. Task 2 - Predict Future Noise Levels Traffic Noise HDR proposes to model the future traffic on the relocated Highway 12, including the interchanges/intersections located at each end of the project corridor. Assumptions: • The MNDOT version of the FHWA Stamina 2.0 model is the appropriate traffic noise model. • Traffic volume, speeds, and vehicle mix will be supplied by MNDOT. • The roadway layout and geometries will be provided in digital format by MNDOT. • The plan and profile sheets can also be obtained from MNDOT. Railroad Not. HDR proposes to model the future railroad traffic on the relocated railroad line. Assumptions: • HDR will use a spreadsheet model based on FTA methodologies, and approved for use by the Surface Transportation Board (formerly known as the Interstate Commerce Commission). • Future train traffic data will be supplied by MNDOT. HDR proposes to report future noise level predictions for the roadway and railroad, separately. HDR will also combine these noise level predictions, and prepare predicted overall noise levels resulting from the proposed roadway and relocated railroad in the project corridor. The combined noise predictions will be presented as noise contour lines overlaid upon a drawing of the project corridor. Predicted noise levels at the monitoring locations will also be shown on the figures. Task 3 - Mitigation At the City’s request, HDR will prepare an evaluation of barriers as a noise mitigation option along the proposed corridor. Assumptions: • Topographic mapping exists for the project corridor for both the existing and future conditions. HDR Engineering. Inc. 06/24/98 Noise wid Vibration Studies for Orono Noise walls are the preferred noise mitigation option, Project Deliverables HDR proposes to deliver two draft and two final copies of the noise and vibration analysis report. The report will include figures that show the predicted noise level and vibration levels as described above. HDR will prepare one set of figures showing existing and predicted future noise levels and vibration levels suitable for use at a public meeting. Predicted future noise levels will be expressed as contour lines overlaid upon a drawing of the project area. Project Meetings HDR proposes to attend one public meeting and one design review meeting. HDR will be prepared to discuss the results of our analyses at each of these meetings. Project Schedule Upon receipt of a notice to proceed, HDR will complete our analyses within four weeks. Project Budget HDR proposes to provide the above services at a cost not to exceed $12,500. This includes HDR’s labor and estimated expenses. HDR will invoice Orono monthly, for labor and direct expenses incurred during the prior month. A copy of HDR’s standard terms and conditions is attached. If our proposal is acceptable to you, please issue a purchase order or a notice to proceed that references this proposal and mail it to my attention. Don ’t hesitate to call me with questions or comments about our environmental services or any environmental regulatory issues that arise. I can be reached at (612) 591-5450. As a member of an employee owned company, I appreciate the opportunity to offer our environmental services to the City of Orono. Sincerely, HDR Engineering, Inc. Timothy G. Casey Project Manager Mark L. Wollschlager, JD Senior Vice President HDR Engineering. Inc. 06/24/98 Noise and Vibration Studies for Orono HDR Engineering. Inc. Terms and Conditions of Engineering Services 1. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE An of ENGINEER'S services under this Agreement wDI be performed in a reasonable and prudent manner in accordance with generally accepted engineering practice. 2. INSURANCE ENGINEER agrees to purchase, at Is own expense. Workers' Compensation, Employer's Liability. Automobile and Commercial General LtabBty Insurance and win, upon request furnish insurance certifScates to OWNER. ENGINEER agrees to indemnity OWNER for the claims covered by ENGINEER'S lisurance subject to the imiation of liabilily contained in Section 17. If requested by OWNER, ENGINEER wH purchase addlional types of insurance, provided the costs of the addUonal insurance are reimbursed by OWNER and the insurance b reasonably avaibbb from carriers acceptable to ENGINEER. 3. OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST (COST ESTIMATES) Any opinions of probabte Project cost or probable construction cost provided by ENGINEER are made on the basb of ENGINEER'S experbnce and qualifications, and represenb Is Judgment as an experbnced and quafilted professional engineer. However, since ENGINEER has no control over the cost of tabor, matertab, equipment or services fumbhed by others, or over the contractorfs') methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, ENGINEER does not guarantee that proposab, bids or actual Project or construction cost win not vary from opinions of probabb cost ENGINEER prepares. 4. CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES ENGINEER'S observation ormon'itoring portions of the work performed under construction contracts shaD notreGeve the contractor from Is responsibility for performing work in accordance with applicabb contract documenb. Accordingly, ENGINEER shall not control or have charge of, and shal not be responsbb for, construction means, methods, techniques, sequences, procedures of construction, health or safety programs or precautbns connected with the work. Further, ENGINEER shal not be responsibb for the acts or ombsbns of the contractor or other parties on the Project 6. CONTROLJJNO LAW Thb Agreement b to be governed by the taw of the state where ENGINEER'S services are performed. OWNER-PROVIDED SERVICES AND INFORMATION OWNER wB provide an criteria and Information pertaining to OWNER'S requirements for the Project Including design objectives and constrainb, space, capadty and performance requiremenb, fbxbility and expandabllly, and any budgetary imlations. OWNERwillabo provide oopbs of any OWNER-fumbhed Standard DetaOs, Standard Specifications, or Standard Bidding Documents which are to be bcorporated into the Project OWNER wB fumsh the senrices of soib/geotechnicat engineers or other consultanb that include reporb and appropriate professbnal recommendations when such services are deemed necessary by ENGINEER. The OWNER agrees to bear frjll responsiblily for the technical accuracy and content of OWNER-frjmbhed documenb and services. The OWNER or OWNER'S representative wiD examine al studbs, reporb, sketches, drawings, specifications, proposab and other documenb prepared by ENGINEER, obtain the advice of an attorney, insurance oounsebr and other consulanb as OWNER deems approprtata for such examination, and renderto ENGINEER, in writing, decbbns pertaining thereto within a reasonabb time so as not to delay the services of ENGINEER. 7. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS OWNER and ENGINEER, respectively, bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives to the covenanb of thb Agreement Neither OWNER nor ENGINEER will assign, subbt or transfer any interest in thb Agreement without the written consent of the other. 8. RE-USE OF DOCUMENTS An documenb, including an reporb. drawings, specifications, computer software or other Items prepared or fumbhed by ENGINEER pursuant to thb Agreement are instrumenb of service with respect to the Project ENGINEER retains ownership of aU such documenb. OWNER nisy retain copbs of the documenb for Rs information and reference b connection with the Project however, none of the documenb are Intended or represented to be sultabb for reuse by OWNER or others on extensbns of the Project for which they were specHicany prepared or on any other project Any reuse wShout written verification or adaptation by ENGINEER for the spedllc purpose intended win be at OWNER'S sob rbk and without lability or bgal exposure to ENGINEER, and OWNER wB defend, indemnify and hold harmbss ENGINEER from al claims, damages, losses and expenses, including attorney's fees, arbbig orresuRing therefrom. Any such verilicatton or adaptation wB entitb ENGINEER to further compensation at rates to be agreed upon by OWNER and ENGINEER 9. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT OWNER or ENGINEER may terminate the Agraement In whob or in part by giving seven (7) days written notice. If the other party substantially feib to fuHB Rs obigations under the Agreement through no fault of the tenninating party. Where the method of payment b lump sum,* or cost reimbursement the final Invoice will include al services and expenses associated with the Project up to the effective date of termination. An equitable adjustment shal abo be (2«3) ' u. - . July 20,1998 Mr. Greg Gappa Director of Pliblic Services City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 HR Dear Mr. Gappa: Thank you for the opportunity to provide this proposal for environmental noise services which is based on our meeting on July 16,1998. HDR proposes to conduct an octave band analysis of existing railroad operations in the project corridor, to review the data collected and determine if the low frequency noise emissions may cause the vibrations experienced by residents nearby the corridor. Project Approach Task 1. Field Measurements HDR proposes to conduct an octave band analysis on the noise emissions from train pass- byes at five sites in the project corridor. The cities of Orono and Lx)ng Lake will select the sites. A minimum of one pass-by will be monitored at each site. Additional trains will be monitored as time allows, at the discretion of HDR staff. HDR will coordinate with the Burlington Northem-Sante Fe Railroad (BN-SF) yard master in Willmar to determine the daily schedule of trains passing through the project area. HDR will attempt to monitor a mixture of empty and loaded trains. However, HDR cannot guarantee that any particular ratio of empty and loaded cars will undergo evaluation. Assumptions: • HDR also assumes that the BN-SF yard master in Willmar, MN will provide approximate daily schedules for trains passing through the project area. • HDR has budgeted four hours for one person to conduct each monitoring event. This includes mobilization, round-trip transportation, meter setup and take down, and the actual monitoring event. HDR has no control over the train schedules, therefore should it take more than an average of four hours per monitoring location, HDR will notify Orono immediately, and request approval to continue the field monitoring portion of the project. • Additional HDR staff are available to perform measurement.' of train pass-bys at other locations. • Prior to HDR staff conducting the analyses, the cities of Orono and Long Lake will obtain permission from the landowners for HDR staff to conduct these analyses on private property, • The cities of Orono and Long Lake will provide maps showing the locations of the monitoring sites prior to mobilization. HDR Engineering, Inc. £fflp/oyee-owned 300 Parkdale 1 Bldg. 5401 Gamble Drive Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416-1518 Telephone 612 591-5400 Fax 612 591-5413 Task 2. Data Evaluation HDR will review the data obtained in the field, and attempt to determine if the noise emissions are capable of causing vibrations in nearby homes. HDR will compare noise measurement data with information in available literature to make this determination. Task 3. Report Preparation HDR will prepare a brief report presenting and interpreting the data collected. HDR will provide three copies of the report. Project Deliverables HDR proposes to deliver three copies of the noise analysis report. The report will include figures that show the locations where railroad noise was monitored. Project Meetings HDR proposes to attend two meetings to discuss the results of this analysis. Project Schedule Upon receipt of a notice to proceed, HDR will begin coordination with the BN-SF Railroad yard master in Willmar, and arrange to rent a noise meter. Upon completing the field monitoring, HDR proposes to provide the final report within one week. Project Budget TOR proposes to provide the above services at a cost not to exceed $5,700. This includes HDR s labor and estimated expenses. Additional HDR staff are available to participate in the noise monitoring. Labor charges for those staff will be $800 for each monitoring event, plus approximately $475 per week for each additional meter rented. HDR will invoice Orono once for the entire cost of the project. A copy of HDR’s standard terms and conditions is attached. If our proposal is acceptable to you, please issue a purchase order or a notice to proceed that references this proposal and mail it to my attention. Don t hesitate to call me with questions or comments about our environmental services or any environmental regulatory issues that arise. I can be reached at (612) 591-5450. As a member of an employee owned company, I appreciate the opportunity to offer om environmental services to the City of Orono. Sincerely, HDR Engineering, Inc. Timothy G. Casey Project Manager Mark L. WoUschlager, JD ^ Senior Vice President HDR Engineering, Inc. 07/20/98 Noise Studies for Orono REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: July 23,1998 ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Ron Moorst Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Action Items for the Upilate of the City's Comprehensive Plan The proposed work plan for the update of the City's Comprehensive Plan includes obtaining market analysis and needs assessment information related to various types of land uses to assist the Council in its planning and decision-making regarding future land uses-both commercial/industrial and residential. This information will enable the City to determine whether the types of land uses planned for various areas of the City are practically feasible from a market standpoint, both now and well into the future, and whether they vrill meet the needs of the City and its residents and property owners both now and well into the future. The types of market and needs assessment information to be obtained are as follows: 1.Market analysis to determine the feasibility of office development on the north side of Highway 12 between Willow Drive and Old Crystal Bay Road. 2.Market analysis to determine the feasibility of light industrial development on the south side of Highway 12. 3.Housing needs analysis to assist the Council in determining the types of housing that would meet the City's current and projected life cycle housing needs, i.e. empty nesters, seniors, etc. 4.Housing market and needs projections to assist the Council in determining whether the housing stock the City plans to develop over the next 10-15 years will be viable and demanded in the marketplace well into the future. 5.A market analysis to determine the types of housing that would be economically feasible in the following two areas: a.The area designated for medium density residential development north of Highway 12 between Old Crystal Bay Road and Willow Drive. b. The southwest quadrant of Old Cry'stal Bay Road and Highway 12 including the Dumas Orchard property. Request for Council Action continued Page 2 July 23, 1998 Action Items for the Update of the City's Comprehensive Plan If the Council determines all or part of this information would be helpful to the City's planning process, staff will obtain proposals from qualified consultants to provide this information. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to indicate whether the Council is interested in obtaining any of the information listed above, and, if so, to direct staff to obtain proposals from qualified consultants to provide the information. COM7PLAN.UPO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: July 23,1998 ITEM NO; Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Scheduling of a Joint Work Session with the Long Lake City Council The City Councils of Orono and Long Lake have been trying to find a date to hold a joint work session to discuss two main issues: 1. Development along Highway 12. 2. Mitigation of the impacts of the new Highway 12 corridor. The Long Lake City Council is available to meet at 5:30 p.m. on Wednesday, August 12. If the Orono Council is available on this date, staff will confirm the meeting with the Long Lake City Council. If not, the Council will need to determine a date or dates which will work. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to select a date and time for a Joint work session with the Long Lake City Council. 14 Jul 1998 Tue 1j52 pm Check Number Check Number 56783 COUNoiL f/i:- - ‘ - i JUL 2 T 1998 D.„ CtlYOrOHONO 56783 CITY COUNTY CREDIT ONION lS-Jul-98 CITY CODNTY CREDIT UNION Check Register City ot Orono Transaction Amount Totals Check Number 56703 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION Check Number 56784 56784 56784 56784 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES lS-Jul-90 15-Jul-98 lS-JuI-98 14 Jul 1998 Tue 1:52 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 2 Date Nane Transaction Amount Conunents 56791 MM HIITDAI. LIFE 56792 KM STATE RETIRSMBMT-DBF COMP MM STATE RETIREMENT-DBF COMP 56792 MM STATE RETIREMENT-DEF COMP 227.00 227.00 DEFERRED COMP W/g 315.17 315.17 OBRA DEFERRED COMP M/H 1.916.90 1.916.90 USCM DEFERRED COMP H/M 4.463.21 5,879.24 PERA EMPLOYEE N/H PERA CITY SHARE CHARITY DOHATIONS N/H Check CheckDateAmount lS-Jul-98 523.11 523.11 14 Jul 1998 Tue 1:03 PM Check Register City of orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 044649 044649 BOBZIEN, SUE A. Totale Check Number 044649 Check Number 044650 044650 BORIS. SCOTT W. Totals Check Number 044650 Check Number 044651 044651 CARLSON, MICHAEL B. Totals Check Number 044651 Check Number 044652 044652 CHESNICK, GARY B. Totals Check Number 044652 Check Number 044653 044653 CORNICK, JAMES L. Totals Check Number 044653 Check Number 044654 044654 DEMBOUSKI, JAY C. Totals Check Number 044654 Check Number 044655 044655 ERICKSON, KURT R Totals Check Number 044655 Check Number 044656 044656 FARNIOK, CORREY L. Totals Check Number 044656 Check Number 044657 044657 PISCHENICH. DAN T. Totals Check Number 044657 Check Number 044658 Check Date 15-JU1-98 15-JU1-98 lS-Jul-98 15-Jul-98 lS-Jul-98 lS-Jul-98 lS-Jul-98 lS-Jul-90 lS-Jul-98 Page 2 Check Amount 644.28 644.28 1,057.82 1,057.82 415.05 415.05 1,609.12 1,609.12 1,359.62 1,359.62 1,539.61 1,539.61 1,316.31 1,316.31 1,224.84 1,224.84 1,233.72 1,233.72 14 Jul 1998 Tue It03 PM Check Number Employee Name Check Number 044658 044658 FISCHER, CHRISTOPHER K. Totals Check Number 044658 Check Number 044659 044659 HANSING, CAROL J. Totals Check Number 044659 Check Number 044660 044660 JOHNSON, BRADLEY P. Totals Check Number 044660 Check Number 044661 C44661 KNOLLENBBRO, KRISTIN L. Totals Check Number 044661 Check Number 044662 044662 MCNALLY, STEVEN A. Totals Check Number 044662 Check Number 044663 044663 MCNICHOLS, DAVID L. Totals Check Number 044663 Check Number 044664 044664 MORONCZYNSKI, JAMES Totals Check Number 044664 Check Number 044665 044665 PERSELL, WILLIAM R. Totals Check Number 044665 Check Number 044666 044666 SCHOENHOFP, JOHN B. Totals Check Number 044666 Check Number 044667 Check Register City of Orono Page 3 Check Date 15-JU1-98 15-JU1-98 15-Jul-98 15-Jul-98 X5-Jul-98 15-JU1-98 15-JU1-98 15-JU1-98 15-JU1-98 Check Amount 893.75 893.75 443.42 443.42 1,060.75 1,060.75 710.55 710.55 1.023.55 1.023.55 846.16 846.16 1,614.37 1,614.37 258.84 258.84 1,358.15 1,358.15 14 Jul 1998 Tue 1:03 W Check Nunber Esiployee Name Check Humber 044667 044667 TOMCHSCK, lANREHCB P. Totals Check Number 044667 Check Number C4 46i 044668 TOHCZYK* MARK H. Totals Check Humber 044668 Check Humber 044669 044669 POLBY* PATRICK B. Totals Check Number 044669 Check Number 044670 044670 JOHNSON, JEPPREY D. Totals Check Humber 044670 Check Number 044671 044671 NITTKB, ANTh'W A. Totals Check Number 044671 Check Number 044672 044672 OAPPRON, MICHAEL P. Totals Check Number 044672 Check Number 044673 044673 GAPPA, GREGORY A. Totals Check Number 044673 Check Nximber 044674 044674 OMAN, LYLE B. Totals Check Number 044674 Check Number 044675 044675 VAN ZOMEREN. ELIZABETH Totals Check Number 044675 Check Number 044676 Check Register City of Orono Page 4 Check Date lS-Jul-98 lS-Jul-90 15-Jul-98 15-JU1-90 15-Jul-90 15-JU1-98 15-JU1-90 lS-Jul-90 lS-Jul-98 Check Amount 312.11 312.11 1,235.37 1,235.37 45.23 45.23 594.05 594.05 193.36 193.36 1,116.97 1,116.97 1,513.87 1,513.87 1,057.15 1,057.15 1,162.53 1,162.53 i i f U Jul 1998 Tue 1:03 PM iieck '•unbar Employee Name Check Number 044676 044676 VANG, BRUCE L. Total! Check Number 044676 Check Number 044677 044677 HECKMAN, STEPHEN J. Total! Check Number 044677 Check Nunber 044678 044678 HEZNBERQER, PAUL E. Total! Check Number 044678 Check Number 044679 C44679 BRINKHAUS, JOHN P. Total! Check Number 044679 Check Number 044680 €44680 DBBABRE, DONALD L. Total! Check Number 044680 Check Number 044681 044681 GREGORY, JAMES D. Total! Check Number 044681 Check Number 044682 044682 HANSEN, STEVEN C. Total! Check Number 044682 Check Humber 044683 044683 OBERAIGNER, SCOTT G. Total! Check Number 044683 Check Number 044684 044684 OBRIEN, RANDY L. Total! Check Number 044684 Check Number 044685 Check Regiater City of Orono Page 5 Check Date lS-Jul-98 lS-Jul-98 15-Jul-98 lS-Jul-98 lS-Jul-98 lS-Jul-98 lS-Jul-98 lS-Jul-98 lS-Jul-98 Check Amount 976.33 976.33 28.42 28.42 754.30 754.30 1,055.63 1,055.63 761.09 761.09 725.62 725.62 708.06 708.06 892.13 892.13 179.37 179.37 14 Jul 1998 Tue 1:03 PM Check Nunber Employee Name Check Number 044685 044685 PAU4ER, GREGORY K. Totals Check Number 044685 Check Number 044686 044686 RATHBUN^ BARRY J. Totals Check Number 044686 Check Number 044687 044687 8KREEN, DALE S. Totals Check Number 044687 Check Number 044688 044688 ALLEN, MICHAEL J. Totals Check Number 044688 Check Number 044689 044689 DELANEY, JANE Totals Check Number 044689 Check Number 044690 044690 DOCimi, THOMAS tf. Totals Check Number 044690 Check Number 044691 044691 MCINTYRE, NILLIAM E. Totals Check Number 044691 Check Number 044692 044692 OAS, DANIEL 0. Totals Check Number 044692 Check Number 044693 Check Register City of Orono Page 6 Check Date 15-JU1-98 15-Jul-98 15-Jul-98 15-JU1-98 15-Jul-98 15-JU1-98 15-JU1-98 15-Jul-98 Check Amount 647.38 647.38 862.53 862.53 625.85 625.85 175.55 175.55 59.18 59.18 475.59 475.59 274.06 274.06 175.97 175.97 044693 PETERSON, JACK N. Totals Check Number 044693 15>Jul-98 291.33 291.33 Check Number 044694 14 Jul 1998 Tue 1:03 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 7 Check Nunber Employee Name Check Date Check Amount Check Number 044C94 044694 ROSS, JOHN A.lS-Jul-98 Totals Check Number 044694 172.78 l-»2.78 Check Number 044695 044695 STFFPENHAGEN, RONALD E 15-Jul-98 Totals Check Number 044695 1,054.36 1,054.36 Check Number 044696 044696 YEAGER, DONALD C.15-JU1-98 Totals Check Number 044696 253.65 253.65 Grand Total 43,105.80 r 24 Jid 1998 Prl 8:45 AK Check Number Check Number 56798 56798 Date 56798 AMEM ll-Jul-96 14-Apr-97 Name AMEH Check Register City of Orono Transaction Amount 80.00 80.00 Totals Check Number 56798 AMEM 160.00 Page 1 Cofiinents TOMCHEaC-A^^ CONFERENCE CHBSWICX-1997 DUES Check Number 56799 APACHE PAPER CO 56799 23-JU1-98 Totals Check Number APACHE PAPER CO 56799 APACHE PAPER CO 460.72 460.72 C-FOLD TOWELS Check Number 56800 ASPLUNDH COFFEE 56800 56800 56800 23-JU1-98 27-CU1-98 23-JU1-98 Totals Check Number ASPLUNDH COFFEE ASPLUNDH COFFEE ASPLUNDH COFFEE 56800 ASPLUNDH COFFEE 6.00 279.00 281.00 566.00 FILTERS COFFEE COFFEE Check Number 56801 AT a T - 56801 27-JU1-98 Totals Check Number AT a T - 56801 AT a T - 12.66 12.66 LONG DIST Check Number 56802 AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES 56802 03-Apr-98 Totals Check Number AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES 56802 AT a T WIRELESS SBIVICES 41.26 41.26 WECXMAN Check Number 56803 AOOIES MOBILE CHEF 56803 2WU1-90 Totals Check Number AUQIES MOBILE CHEF 56803 AUQIES MOBILE CHEF 46.40 46.40 HOT DOGS, CHEESEBURGERS Check Number 56804 BLACKOWIAK a SON 56804 27-JU1-98 Totals Check Number BLACKOWIAK a SON 56804 BLACKOWIAK a SON 175.00 175.00 50TD Check Number 56805 BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC. 56805 56805 56805 56805 56805 23-JU1-98 23-JU1-98 23-JU1-98 23-JU1-98 23-JU1-98 BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC. BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC. BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC. BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC. BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC. 581.00 2,424.82 3,566.74 588.92 73.80 I/I CASCO/FERNDALB AREA BYRDQB/BRKT INSP APR-MAY NLL/LLCC INSP APR-MAY I/I SAGA HILLS/FOREST LK OCB RO TRAIL INSP-APR 24 Jul 1998 Check Register Page Pri 8:45 AH City of Orono Check Transaction Number Date Name Amount Cociments Check Number 56805 B(»iBSTROO ROSBHB 6 ASSOC. S6805 23-Jul-98 BONBSTROO ROSENS k ASSOC.612.00 BRIDGE INSP-APRIL Totals Check Number 56805 BONESTROO ROSENB k ASSOC.7,847.28 Check Number 56806 BRYAN RCXHC PRODUCTS INC. 56806 23-Jul-98 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC.477.96 mCXBERRY BALL FIELD Totals Check Number 56806 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC.477.96 Check Number 56807 BUDGET PRINTING 56807 22-Jan-98 BUDGET PRINTING 6.43 SHIPPING FOR TRAINING HAT 56807 24-Jul-98 BUDGET PRINTING 171.52 RFP FOR ASSESSOR Totals Check Number 56807 BDDOBT PRINTINO 177.95 Check Number 56809 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 568U9 27-JU1-98 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 65.76 96 FORD/ Lie 180/RU1 56809 27-JU1-98 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 29.89 93 FORD/ Lie 170/R6M 56809 27-Jul-98 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 140.61 96 FORD/ Lie 180/RfcM 56809 27-JU1-98 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 306.51 96 FORD/ Lie 176/R6M 56809 27-JU1-98 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 29.89 96 FORD/ Lie 175/RAM 56809 27-JU1-98 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 355.16 97 FORD/ Lie 178/RAM 56809 27-Jul-98 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 62.10 96 FORD/ Lie 179/RAM 56809 27-Jul-98 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 158.83 97 FORD/ Lie 177/RAM 56809 27-JU1-98 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 97.88 96 FORD/ Lie 179/RAM 56809 27-JU1-98 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 375.44 96 FORD/ Lie 187/RAM 56809 27-Jul-98 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 132.92 96 FORD/ Lie 176/RAM 56809 27-Jul-98 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 32.21 97 FORD/ Lie 178/RAM 56809 27-JU1-98 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 49.56 97 FORD/ Lie 177/RAM 56809 27-Jul-98 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 15.99 96 FORD/ Lie 176/RAH 56809 27-JU1-98 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 146.83 96 FORD/Lie 181 -SYS eK 56809 27-Jul-98 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 260.11 96 FORD/ Lie 175/RAM 56809 27-Jul-98 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 671.90 97 FORD/Lie 177 -NIRB 56809 27-Jul-98 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 43.69 96 FORD/Lie 180 • RAH 56809 27-JU1-98 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 430.22 96 FORD/Lie 182- RAH 56809 27-Jul-98 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 183.80 96 FORD/Lie 179- RAM 56809 27-JU1-98 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 315.36 CASE 621 B LOAD/Ae SERV 56809 27-JU1-98 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 157.12 93 FORD/Lie 170 - RAM Totals Check Number 56809 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 4,061.78 Check Number 56810 CITY OP NBN HOPE 56810 23-JU1-98 CITY OP NEW HOPE 2,935.90 MPRS SETTLEMENT Totals Check Number 56810 CITY OP NEW HOPE 2,935.90 Check mrniber 56811 CITY OP NAYZATA 56811 14-Jul-97 CITY OP HAY2ATA 3,392.97 2ND OTR WTR CONSUMPTION :4 Jul 1998 ?ri 8:45 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Nuinber Date Kame Check number 56811 CITY OP MAYZATA Totals Check Nuinber 56811 CITY OF NAYZATA Check Number 56812 CITYVIBN PLUMBING k HEATING 56812 56812 21-JU1-98 21-Jul-98 CITYVIBN PLUMBING k HEATING CITYVIBM PLUMBING k HEATING Totals Check Number 56812 CITYVIBW PLUMBING k HEATING Check Number 56813 COLONIAL LIFE INSURANCE CO, 56813 21-JU1-98 COLONIAL LIFE INSURANCE CO Totals Check Number 56813 COLONIAL LIFE INSURANCE CO Check Number 56814 CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL ELEC, 56814 27-JU1-98 CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL ELEC. Totals C2\eck Number 56814 CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL ELEC, Check Number 56815 DAKLXB TREE SERVICE 56815 21-Jul-98 DAHLKE TREE SERVICE Totals Check Number 56815 DAHLKE TREE SERVICE Check Number 56816 DEM-CON LANDFILL INC, 56816 23-Jul-98 DEM-CON LANDFILL INC Totals Check Number 56816 DEM-CON LANDFILL INC. Check Nuinber 56817 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 56817 27-Jul-98 dept of PUBLIC SAFETY Totals Check Number 56817 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Check Number 56818 EARL F. ANDERSON fi ASSOC 56818 21-Jul-98 EARL F. ANDERSON k ASSOC Totals Check Number 56818 EARL F. ANDERSON k ASSOC Check Number 56819 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 56819 21-Jul-98 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE Totals Check Nun^r 56819 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE Check Number 56820 ELMER J. PETERSON CO 56820 23-Jul-98 ElMBR J. PETERSON CO Transaction Amount 3.392.97 262.11 8.43 270.-4 864.86 864.86 109.40 109.40 5.280.00 5.280.00 108.00 108.00 510.00 510.00 138.96 138.96 149.40 149.40 157.00 1 Page 3 Cbmments CONDENSATION PAN k FILTER PVC COUPLING JULY INS LS21 COIL k ALTERNATOR STORM - TREE TRIM k CLEAN SALT SHED ROOF DISP CONNECT CHARGE STREET SIGNS BEER PUMPING SEPTIC TANK CSieck Humber 56824 0 6 K SERVICES 56624 21-Jul-98 G k K SERVICES 56824 21-JU1-98 G k K SERVICES 56824 21-JU1-98 G k K SERVICES 56824 21-Jul-96 G k K SERVICES 56824 21-Jul-9B Q k K SERVICES 56824 21-Jul-98 0 k K SERVICES 56824 21-Jul-98 G k K SERVICES 56824 21-Jul-98 G k K SERVICES Totals Check Number 56824 G k K SERVICES 24 Jul 1998 Fri 8:45 AM Check Number Date Check Number 56827 GENUINE 56827 24-Jul-98 56827 24-JU1-98 56827 24-JUI-98 56827 24-Jul-98 S6827 24-Jul-98 56827 24-JU1-98 56827 24-JU1-98 56827 24-Jul-98 24 Jul 1998 Fri 8:45 AM Check Nunber Check Regidter City of Orono Date Name Check Number 56834 JUDD SUPPLY COMPANY Total* Check Number 56834 JUDD SUPPLY COMPANY Check Number 56835 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC 56835 27-JU1-98 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC Total* Check Number 56835 KUSTOM SIQIALS INC Check Number 56836 LAND CARS EQUIPMENT 56836 23-Jul-98 LAND CARE EQUIPMENT Total* Check Number 56836 LAND CARE EQUIPMENT Check Number 56837 1X)GIS 56837 27-JU1-98 LOGIS Total* Check Number 56837 I/X5IS Check Number 56838 LONG LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS 56838 56838 27-Jul-98 27-JU1-98 LONG LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS LOIR3 LAKE BIO A AUTO PARTS Total* Check Number 56838 LONG LAKE BIO A AOTO PARTS Check Number 56839 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT 56839 56839 56839 23-JU1-98 23-Jul-98 23-Jul-98 LOJK3 LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT Total* Check Number 56839 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT Check NunU>er 56840 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI k CO 56840 56840 56840 56840 23-Jul-98 23-Jul-98 23-Jul-98 23-Jul-98 Total* Check Number 56840 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI & CO Check Number 56841 MEDICA CHOICE 56841 56841 21-JU1-98 ai-Jul-98 MEDICA CHOICE MEDICA CHOICE Total* Check Number 56841 MEDICA CHOICE Check Nua^>er 56842 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS 56842 2l-Jul-98 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS Page 6 Thransactlon Amount 468.60 Comments 187.54 187.54 PARTS li LABOR 34.64 34.64 BEARING« BOLT 903.88 903.88 MAY PIMS DATA PROC 9.67 3.20 12.87 STOP TAIL HOSE CLAMPS 6.48 -104.90 483.51 385.09 RADIATOR CAP RETURN-HEAVY BLADE HEAVY BLADE CO 1.844.00 AUDIT PYMNT •3 PINAL CO 2.700.00 AUDIT PYMNT 13 PINAL CO 2.245.00 AUDIT PYMNT •3 PINAL CO 1.900.00 AUDIT PYMNT 83 PINAL CO 8.689.00 202.25 10,384.75 10.587.00 AUGUST HEALTH INSURANCE AUGUST HEALTH INSURANCE 18.472.66 AUGUST SEWER SERVICE 2i Jul 1998 /ri 8:45 AH Check Number Check Register City of Orono Date Name Check Number 56842 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SYCS Totals Check Number 56842 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS Check Number 56843 MID-CONTINENT BOTTLERS 56843 27-Jul-98 MID-CONTINENT BOTTLERS Totals Check Number 56843 MID-CONTINENT BOTTLERS Check Number 56844 MIDIfEST ASPHALT 56844 56844 23-JU1-98 23-JU1-98 MIDWEST ASPHALT MIDWEST ASPHALT Totals Check Number 56844 MIDWEST ASPHALT Check Number 56845 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO 56845 21-JU1-98 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Totals Check Number 56845 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Check Number 56846 MINN STATE TREASURER 56846 24-Jul-98 MINN STATE TREASURER Totals Check Number 56846 MINN STATE TREASURER Check Number 56847 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 56847 27-JU1-98 MINNEAPOLIS OXYC^ COMPANY Totals Check Number 56847 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY Check Number 56848 MN POLICE RECRUITMENT SYSTEM 56848 27-Jul-98 MN POLICE RECRUITMENT SYSTEM Totals Check Number 56848 MN POLICE RECRUITMENT SYSTEM 56849 MR AUGIES COFFEE SERVICE 21-Jul-98 MR AUGIES COFFEE SERVICE Check Number 56849 Totals Check Number 56849 HR AUGIES COFFEE SERVICE Check Number 56850 NAV\RRB HARDWARE 56850 56850 56850 23-Jul-98 23-Jul-98 23-Jul-98 NAVARRE HARDWARE NAVARRE HARDWARE NAVARRE HARDWARE Transaction Amount 18,472.66 132.00 132.00 234.75 78.25 313.00 529.00 529.00 4,463.17 4,463.17 27.00 27.00 181.63 181.63 49.50 49.50 Page 7 Comments HOT MIX HOT MIX POWERAID & COKE 2ND QTR SURCHARGE OXYGEN LEGAL AS P/1ST62ND QTR COFFEE 75.59 JUNE HARDWARE 27.10 JUNE HARDWARE 27.04 JUNE HARDWARE 24 Jul 1990 Fri 0:45 AM Check Register City of Orono Page 0 Check Number Date Name Check Number S6050 56050 NAVARR£ HAROWARB 23-Jul-90 NAVARRE HARDWARE Totals Check NUlsber 56050 NAVARRE HARDWARE Check Number 56051 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC. 56051 21-Jul-90 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC, Totals Check Number 56051 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC. Check Number 56052 OTTBN BROTHERS 56052 56052 27-Jul-90 23-JU1-90 OTTBN BROTHERS OTTBN BROTHERS Totals Check Number 56052 OTTBN BROTHS^ Check Number 56053 PIONBSI Check Number 56054 56654 PRAIRIE OFFSET 21-Jul-98 PRAIRIE OFFSET Totals Check Number 56854 PRAIRIE OFFSET Oieck Number 56855 RDO FINANCIAL SERVICES 56055 23-Jul-98 RDO FINANCIAL SERVICES Totals Check Number 56055 RDO FINANCIAL SERVICES Check NuaR>er 56056 REED VBIDINO 56056 56056 21-JU1-98 27-JU1-90 REED VENDING REED VENDING Totals Check Number 56056 REED VENDING Check NuiWt>er 56857 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES 56857 16-Jul-96 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES Totals Check Number 56057 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES Check Humber 56850 SAGE PUBLICATIONS 56051 21-JU1-90 SAGE PUBLICATIONS Transaction Amount Coonents 221.33 351.06 JUNE HARDWARE 16.17 16.17 CHIPS 9.54 2,394.09 LANDSCAPE MAT/BAYRDGB SWR 2,403.63 56053 23-JuI-98 PIONEER 50.33 AD PO BIDS-5DGBNOOD HILLS 56053 23-JU1-98 PIONEER 91.67 ORDINANCE 176 56053 23-JU1-90 PIONEER 35.95 ORDINANCE 175 56053 23-Jul-98 PIONEER 43.14 ORDINANCE 174 Totals Check Number 56853 PIONEER 221.09 667.90 667.90 INSPECTION NOTICES 151.96 151.96 WATER PUMP 113.00 79.50 CANDY 6 ROLLS CANDY F/RESALE 192.50 6.728.12 6.720.12 mXST PEE 50.00 SUBSCRIPTIOn 24 Jul 1998 Frl 8:45 AH Ql«Ck Kusber Check Kunber Check Register City of Orono Date Name 56858 SAGE PUBLICATIONS Totals Check Number 56858 SAGE PUBLICATIONS Check Number 56859 56859 SCHARBQl 4 SONS 23-JU1-98 Totals Check Number SCHARBER 4 SONS 56859 SCHARBER 4 SONS Check Number 56860 56860 SCHOENINO EXCAVATING 21-JU1-98 Totals Check Number SCHOENING EXCAVATING 56860 SCHOENINO EXCAVATING Check Number 56861 56861 56861 56861 56861 56861 56861 SNYDER DRUG STORES 27-JU1-98 27-JU1-98 27-JU1-98 27-JU1-98 27-Jul-98 27-JU1-98 SNYDER SNYDER SNYDER SNYDER SNYDER SNYDER DRUG DRUG DRUG DRUG DRUG DRUG STORES STORES STORES STORES STORES STORES Totals Check Number 56861 SNYDER DRUG STORES Check Number 56862 56862 STANDARD SPRING 24-JU1-98 Totals Oieck Number STANDARD SPRING 56862 STA*IDARD SPRING Check Number 56863 56863 STEFFENHAOBN, RON 2l-Jul-98 Totals Check Number 5TEPFENHAGEN, RON 56863 STBFFENHAGEN. RON Check Number 56864 56864 STENART LUMBER 18-Jun-98 Totals Check Number STENART LUMBER 56864 STEWART LUMBER: Check Number 56865 56865 THE SIGN AGE 27-JU1-98 Totals Check Number the sign age 56865 THE SIGN AGS Check Number 56866 56866 THORPE DIST CO. 27-JU1-98 THORPS DIST CO Transaction Amotint 50.00 15.18 15.18 7.515.50 7.515.50 39.36 4.25 12.18 1.05 9.55 3.35 69.74 727.57 727.57 211.94 211.94 1,206.41 1,206.41 117.15 117.15 152.10 Page 9 Coenents WHEEL STORM - LOADER 4 DUMP TRK PII>1 4 BATTERIES FILM DEVELOPING riW DEVELOPING envelopesupplies MEDICAL SUPPLIES SPRINGS AIR CONDITIONER NOQD FOR CANOPY magnetic 4 ADHESIVE BEER F/RESALB 24 Jul 1998 Pri 8:45 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 5686$ THORPS DIST CO. Totals Check Number 56866 THORPS DIST CO. Check Number 56867 TOMCZYK, HARK 56867 23-Jul-98 T0MC2YK. MARK Totals Check Number 56867 TOMCZYK. MARK Check Number 56868 TRACY TRIPP FUELS 56868 56868 23-JU1-98 23-Jul-98 TRACY TRIPP FUELS TRACY TRIPP FUELS Totals Check Number 56868 TRACY TRIPV FUELS Check Number 56869 TRI STATS POMP 56869 21-Jul-98 TRI STATE PUMP Totals Check Number 56869 TRI STATE PUMP Check Number 56870 TWIN CITIES SERVICE CENTER INC 56870 56870 23-JU1-98 23-JU1-98 TWIN CITIES SERVICE CENTER INC TWIN CITIES SERVICE CENTER INC Totals Check Number 56870 TWIN CITIES SERVICE CENTER INC Check Number 56871 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 56871 56871 27-JUI-98 27-JU1-98 UNIFORMS UNLIHITB) UNIFORMS UNLIMITED Totals Check Number 56871 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED Check Number 56872 VILLAGE CHEVROLET 56872 27-JU1-98 VILLAGE CHEVROLET Totals Check Number 56872 VILLAGE CHEVROLET Check Number 56873 W.W. GRAINGER INC. 56873 23-JU1-98 W.W. GRAINGER INC. Totals Check Number 56873 W.W. GRAINGER INC. Check Number 56874 WARNING LITBS OF MN 56874 56874 27-JU1-98 27-Jul-98 WARNING LITBS OF W WARNING LITBS OF m Totals Check Number 56874 WARNING LITBS OF MN Transaction Amount 152.10 182.06 182.06 366.65 2«715.11 3.081.76 1.228.04 1*228.04 23.85 161.35 185.20 90.05 130.45 220.50 30.51 30.51 51.67 51.67 1.126.27 105.44 1.231.71 Page 10 Comments SMOKING CESSATICRI UNLEADED fc DIESEL UNLEADED LIFT STATION REPAIRS HELICAL ANTQIIA ANTENIA & MICROPHONE BADGE REPLACEMENT RED WING BOOTS/CHESWICK FUEL PUMP SOCKETS WATERMAIN BREAK BARRICADE'S 24 Jul 1998 Fri Bi45 AM Check Register City of Orono Check (^eck IIUBber 56876 ffILLlAMS LANN SERVICB 56876 21-Jul-98 WILLIAMS LAWN SERVICB Totele Check Nunber 56876 WILLIAMS LAim SERVICE Check Wamber 56877 YOCIM OIL CO INC. 56877 27-JU1-98 YOCUM OIL CO INC. Totals Check Number 56877 YOCUM OIL CO INC. Check Number 56878 YOUNG, JACKIE 56878 21-JUI-98 YOUNG, JACKIE Tbtala Check Number 56878 YOUNG, JACKIE Grand Total Page 11 Transaction Number Data Name Amount Cociinents Check Number S687S NBSTSIDB WHOLESALE TIRE 56875 31-Jul-98 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE 60.39 TIRE REPAIR 56875 21-Jul-98 WESTSIDE lfHor.R55aT.R TIRE 60.39 TIRE 8429 Totals Check timber 5687S WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE 120.78 1,300.00 1,300.00 968.90 968.90 525.00 525.00 219,265.95 MOWING 5/98 DIESEL FUEL 6/15 PLANNING COM r CO'JiNUL tJitL I JUL 2 7 1998 crrv cf ORONO INFORMATION ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL MEETING JUL 2 7 1998 CITY OF ORONO OF REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OP RUN 07/08/98PERMIT TYPE QTY Building SOL PAMILY-NEH SP-ADD/REMODEL 8P-ACC STRUCTURE DEMO/PRIMCIPAL COMMERCIAL-NEN COM-ADD/REMODEL COM-ACC 8TRUCTUR DEMO IN8T-ADD/REMODBL IN8T-ACC STRUCT DBMO'ACCBSSORY ACC/OARAOBS Sub-total 17 177 17 10 1 Machanioal HEATING SYSTEMS AIR CONDITIONING NOOD STOVB/PLUB PIRBPLACB VENTILATION GAS LINE INSPECT DUCT WORK ONLY REMOVE OIL TANK Sub-total Plumbing PIXTURBS SPRINKLER WATER METER VACUUM BREAKER UNDBPIMBD Sub-total Sawar fc Watar SBNBR CONNECTION NEW SEPTIC SYSTB DRNPLD 8/OR TANK SAC ONLY SEPTIC CONNBCTIN SBNBR DISCONNECT SBNBR REPAIR SBNBR h WATER UNDBPINBD Sub-total Sign PBR./PRBB STANDG TEMPORARY Sub-cotal PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED***** PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OP ORONO-- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/98 - 06/30/98BASE PEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW 40,590.75 44,229.25 5,961.50 530.00 6,365.25 646.75 .50 7,283,976.00 3,958,720.75 649,680.00 1,000.00 1,492,000.00 41,875.00 109.000.00 26,383.95 19,180.21 3,807.39 0.00 4,137.41 202.15 105.46 0 0.00 0.00 0*00 2 902.25 122,480.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 90.00 0.00 0.00 9 2,116.75 149,832.00 1,356.38 244*102,860.00*13,808,563.75*55,172.95* 47 7,060.61 556,193.44 0.00 10 591.82 44,276.52 0.00 2 70.00 3,000.00 0.00 43 1,907.69 111,715.00 0.00 S 175.00 7,400.00 0.00 5 175.00 5,659.00 0.00 11 398.75 17,133.00 0.00 3 105.00 1,750.00 0.00 126*10,483.87*747,126.96*0.00* 95 8,211.22 573,853.38 0.00 1 82.75 6,620.00 0.00 5 1,179.00 0.00 0.00 3 105.00 450.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 104*9,577.97*580,923.38*0.00* 23 805.00 0.00 0.00 19 1,850.00 0.00 0.00 2 100.00 0.00 0.00 20 18,250.00 0.00 0.00 1 50.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 750.00 0.00 1 70.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 69*21,195.00*750.00*0.00* 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 0.00 0.00 1*35.00*0.00*0.00* YEAR-TO-DATE*****- •'v-U.JUL 2 r i996BQUBSTBRi PAGE:QTY BASE PEE VALUATION 13 24,601.75 3,934,745.46 128 36,295.00 3,417,501.50 10 1,574.50 97,750.00 4 230.00 0.00 1 887.25 100,000.00 5 2,567.50 315,796.00 0 0.00 0.00 2 100.00 0.00 1 1,242.25 171,000.00 1 29.25 775.00 3 120.00 0.00 2 324.50 19,073.00 170*67,972.00*8,056,640.96* 52 4,439.14 342,604.88 5 292.50 20,370.00 0 0.00 0.00 33 1,225.46 59,632.55 5 175.00 7,560.00 12 420.00 5,125.00 5 175.00 5,950.00 5 990.00 72,850.00 117*7,717.10*514,092.43* 91 6,715.83 422,462.56 2 161.69 12,935.00 7 1,126.99 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 1,000.00 101*8,039.51*436,397.56* PLAN REVIEW 15,991 17,135 1,009 0 576 170 0 0 0 19 0 210 35,112 .11 .00 .77 .00 .71 .30 .00 .00 .00 .01 .00 .93 .83* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 2 14 2 4 0 0 0 2 1 25* 70.00 1.400.00 100.00 3.800.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 140.00 35.00 5,545.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 3 2 5* 118.25 60.00 178.25* 3,300.00 0.00 3,300.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00* PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTEDREPORT HER. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OP RUN 07/08/98 PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO YEAR-TO-DATE*****PAGE]REQUESTER:•01/01/98 -RANGE . . . .06/30/98 01/01/97 - 06/30/97 • PERMIT TYPE QTY BASS FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE PEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW Fire FIRE SPRINKLER 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 140.00 11,200.00 0.00 FIRE SPRINKLER 1 3,650.00 292,000.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 1*3,650.00*292,000.00*0.00*1*140.00*11,200.00*0.00* Uaar Daflnad ... ... LAND ALTERATION 12 675.00 500.00 0.00 7 450.00 0.00 0.00 DOCKS 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 90.00 2,500.00 0.00 LANN SPRINKLER 10 350.00 0.00 0.00 14 490.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 22*1,025.00*500.00*0.00*24*1,030.00*2,500.00*0.00* Grand-total 567**148,826.84** 15 ,429,864.09**55,172.95**443**90,621.86**9,024,130.95**35,112.83** . • '• % PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED YEAR-TO-DATEREPORT NBR. BPBBRPT2-1 DATS OP RUN 07/08/98 *t*«* PERMIT FBB REPORT •* CITY OP ORONO PROM 01/01/98 TO 06/30/98 REPORT HER. BPBERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 07/08/98 '•* PERMIT FEE REPORT ** CITY OP ORONO FROM 01/01/98 TO 06/30/98 BASE PEE PLAN REVIEW SURCHARGE Lie. SEARCH PEE SAC IMVBSTIGATKXI DEPOSIT MAIL IN •92 STUBBS BAY SEWER CONN CHARO SEWER CONNECTION WATER CONNECTION REPORT TOTAL 148«826.84 55.172.95 7,652.50 0.00 6,000.00 1,258.25 0.00 157.90 14,655.00 8.700.00 4.190.00 ESCROW PERMIT TOTAL 0.00 246,613.44 PAOBtREQUESTERtBUILDINGMECHANICALPLUMBINGSEWER k WATER USER SIGN FIREBASE PEE 102,860.00 10,483.87 9,577.97 21,195.00 1,025.00 35.00 3,650.00PLAN REVIEW 55,172.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 6,802.92 376.28 298.30 24.00 5.00 0.00 146.00 Lie. SEARCH PEE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 SAC 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 1,223.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.CO MAIL IN •92 STUBBS BAY SEWER CONN CHARG SEWER CONNECTION WATER CONNECTION 14,655.00 108.00 45.40 1.50 8.700.00 4.190.00 3.00 ESCROW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTMCi 181,714.12 10,968.15 9,921.67 39,110.50 1,068.00 35.00 3,796.00 PAOEi REQUESTER: ;s PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED•RMTISS-l17/06/98 JSB ***** permit issued reportCITY OF ORONO YEAR-TO-DATE*****PAGE: 1REQUESTER: CAROLE01/01/90 -RANGE . . . . .06/30/98 01/01/97 -RANGE . . . . .06/30/97QTYBASE FEB VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW84,037.50 0.00 0.00 4 2,595.00 0.00 0.00369,510.00 0.00 0.00 45 10,350.00 0.00 0.00 12 1,700.00 0.00 0.00 10 2,450.00 0.00 0.00 2 500.00 0.00 0.00 5 1,250.00 0.00 0.00 3 725.00 0.00 0.00 2 575.00 0.00 0.00 1 300.00 0.00 0.00 1 300.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 250.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 64*17,822.50*0.00*0.00*69*17,520.00*0.00*0.00* 64**17,022.50**0.00**0.00**69**17,520.00**0.00**0.00** lo let--' ■ iK-’ FEERPT2-1 07/06/98 >EE ***** permit FEE REPORT ***** CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/98 TO 06/30/98 USER REPORT TOTAL 17,022.50 17,022.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,822.50 17,022.50 PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE Hinnetonka Beach Plan Review 7,206.05 2,133.30 2,493.88 170.46 308.10 0.00Inapectlons195.00 285.00 225.00 540.00 525.00 270.00Retainer25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00TOTAL7,426.05 2,443.30 2,743.88 735.46 858.10 295.00No. Plan Reviews1 0 2 3 1 4 0 No. Inspections 13 19 IS 36 35 18 2,513.30 2,828.88 1,219.67 943.10 960.62 PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTEDREPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OP RUN 07/06/98 ♦ * * • *JUNE 1998PERMIT ISSUED REPORT ***** CITY OF ORONO COUNCIL ,JUL 2 7 1998 PAGB: 1REQUESTER: CAROLEPERMIT TYPEBuilding SGL FAMILY-NEW SP-ADD/^^RMODBL SF-ACC SaRUCTURB DEMO/PRINCIPAL COM-ADD/RBMODBL INST-ADD/RBMODEL inst-acc struct ACC/GARAGBS Sub-total Mechanical HEATING SYSTEMS AIR CONDITIONING WOOD STOVB/FLUE FIREPLACE VENTILATION GAS LINE INSPECT DUCT WORK ONLY REMOVE OIL TANK Sjb-total Plumbing FIXTURES SPRINKLER WATER METER VACUUM BREAKER UNDEFINED Sub-total Sewer k Water SEWER CONNECTION NEW SEPTIC SYSTB DRNFLD k/OR TANK SAC ONLY SEWER DISCONNECT SEWER k WATER UNDEFINED Sub-total Sign PER./FREE STANDG Sub-total User Defined LAND ALTERATION DOCKS LAWN SPRINKLER Sub-total Grand-total QTY 3 44 4 2 1 1 0 1 56* 11 3 1e 2 1 1 0 25* 20 1 1 2 0 24* 7 5 1 7 1 1 1 23* 0 0* 5 0 7 12* 140*‘ . . . . CURRENT06/01/98 -RANGE . . . . .06/30/98 . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN HI.VI BN 0,349.25 1,003,000.00 5,427.01 5 7,731.25 1,158,600.00 5,025.30 7,814.25 543,519.91 1,892.49 29 5,505.75 424,185.00 2,459.93 1,157.00 101,700.00 752.06 3 305.00 15,500.00 198.25 100.00 0.00 1 50.00 0.00 0.00 287.25 19,800.00 186.71 1 1,212.25 165,000.00 0.00 902.25 103,000.00 0.00 1 1,242.25 171,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 29.25 775.00 19.01 358.75 25,500.00 233.19 2 324.50 19,073.00 210.93 L0,968.75*2,59<,519.91*0,491.46*43*16,400.25*1,954,133.00*7,913.42* 1,072.23 03,178.44 0.00 4 339.81 27,185.00 0.00 105.00 6,131.00 0.00 3 105.00 5,370.00 0.00 35.00 1,000.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 330.63 20,450.00 0.00 7 270.75 13,050.00 0.00 70.00 2,250.00 0.00 2 70.00 4,875.00 0.00 35.00 1,000.00 0.00 3 105.00 1,500.00 0.00 35.00 1,300.00 0.00 1 35.00 1,650.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 850.00 68,000.00 0.00 1,682.06*115,309.44*0.00*21*1,783.56*121,630.00*0.00* 1,970.51 134,024.38 0.00 11 574.56 29,573.17 0.00 82.75 6,620.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 247.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 70.00 300.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 1,000.00 0.00 2,370.26*140,944.38*0.00*12*609.56*30,573.17*0.00* 245.00 0.00 0.00 2 70.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 6 600.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,000.00 0.00 0.00 2 2,850.00 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 70.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.no 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,900.00*0.00*0.00*10*3,520.00*0.00*0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 21.00 500.00 0.00 0.00*0.00*0.00*1*21 JO*500.00*0.00* 300.00 0.00 0.00 3 175.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 30.00 0.00 0.00 245.00 0.00 0.00 9 315.00 0.00 0.00 545.00*0.00*0.00*13*520.00*0.00*0.00* 31,466.87**2,053,773 73**0,491.46**100**22,934.37**2,106,036.17**7,913.42** PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED JUNE 1998REPORT NBR. BPBBRPT2-1 DATE OP RUN 07/06/98 CITY OP PROM 06/01/98 REPORT **••* ORONOTO 06/30/98 PAGESREQUESTERS CAROLEBUILDINGMECHANICALPLUMBINGSEWER & HATER USER SIGN PIREBASE PEE 18,968.75 1,682.86 2,370.26 7,900.00 545.00 0.00 0.00 PLAN REVIEW 8,491.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 1,249.82 57.77 73.48 7.50 3.50 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH PEE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SAC •1,000.00 • 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ' 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 424.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT J.OO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 •92 STUBBS BAY SEWER CONN CHARG MAIL IN SEWER ORINBCTTON WATER CONNECTION 30.00 10.91 8.700.00 4.190.00 1.50 • ESCROW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 44,789.53 1,770.63 2,454.65 20,797.50 550.00 0.00 0.00 REPORT NBR. BPBBRPT2-1 OATS OP RUN 07/06/98 ** PERMIT PEE REPORT ** CITY OP ORONO PROM 06/01/98 TO 06/30/98 BASE PEE PLAN REVIEW 8URCHARGB Lie. SEARCH PEE SAC INVESTIGATION DEPOSIT REPORT TOTAL 31,466.87 8,491.46 1,392.07 0.00 1,000.00 424.50 0.00 •92 STUBBS BAY SEWER CONN CHARG MAIL IN SEWER CONNECTKNI WATER CONNECTION 14,655.00 42.41 8.700.00 4.190.00 ESCROW PERMIT TOTAL 0.00 70,362.31 ■A PAGEt 2 REQUESTERi CAROLE MON, JUL 6, 1998, 4:50 PMPERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OP PERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY PAGE 1JUNE 1908 OWNER LAST NM VALUATION0101 02 03 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 08 09 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 15 16 16 19 21 21 21 21 21* 21 24 24 29 29 29 29 29 29 3580 1040 140 129 3237 160 825 1135 2740 1359 480 1370 3250 245 2405 4080 960 1145 2120 1015 1005 4395 3685 . 3285 3083 2790 1920 253 4195 2138 765 3540 3233 2425 2205 4665 340 1655 3551 2500 1360 3243 2765 3440 770 4545 3480 4205 3465 95 2595 2300 2874 4085 DR DR BAYSIDE RD TONKAWA RD HACKBERRY HILL CHEVY CHASE DR CASCO CIR WEAR LA N FOREST ARMS LA NORTH ARM DR CAROLINE AVE PARK DR STUBBS BAY RD N FRENCH CREEK DR POX ST TONKA AVE DUNWOODY AVE DAHL RD TONKAWA RD 6TH AVE N WEBBER HILLS RD LINDEN LA LINDEN LA NORTH SHORE NORTH SHORE CARMAN RD FAIRVIEW LA SILVER VIEW DR CONCORDIA ST CYGNET PL FOREST LAKE DR SHADYWOOD RD OLD CRYSTAL BAY NORTH SHORE DR CASCO CIR DUNWOODY AVE SHADYWOOD RD BAYSIDE RD TURNHAM RD BOHNS PT RD LIVINGSTON AVE SHADYWOOD RD NORTH ARM DR CASCO CIR CASCO POINT RD BAYSIDE RD BROWN RD N NORTH SHORE NORTH SHORE FOREST LAKE CRYSTAL PL LEAP ST LYDIARD CIR FOX ST CASCO rOTNT DR DR DR WATERTOWrt RD 98/06/03 OR- 98/06/02 OR- 98/06/19 OR- 98/06/09 OR- 98/06/03 OR- 98/06/01 OR- 98/06/11 OR- 98/06/09 OR- 98/06/16 OR- 98/06/29 OR- 98/06/25 OR- 98/06/03 OR- 98/06/30 OR- 9«/06/08 OR- 98/06/01 OR- 98/06/01 OR- 98/06/02 OR- 98/06/03 OR- 98/06/04 OR- 98/06/05 98/06/05 98/06/10 98/06/12 98/06/15 98/06/15 98/06/17 98/06/18 98/06/18 98/06/22 98/06/23 RD N 98/06/23 98/06/23 98/06/24 98/06/29 98/06/30 98/06/30 98/06/24 98/06/18 98/06/26 98/06/02 98/06/10 98/06/15 98/06/15 98/06/23 98/06/23 98/06/25 98/06/12 98/06/11 98/06/01 98/06/04 98/06/16 98/06/11 98/06/25 98/06/29 OR- OR- OR- OR- OR- OR- OR OR- OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR 010300010302010383 010324 010235 010263 010331 010348 010357 010405 010406 010195 010435 010338 010295 010296 010299 010321 010326 •010335 •010336 •010354 •010362 •010371 •010373 -010381 -010388 -010389 -010393 -010397 -010398 -010400 -010408 -010427 -010440 -010441 -010384 -010386 -010424 -010280 -010355 -010369 -010370 -010395 -010401 -010418 -010345 -010351 -010253 -010282 -010330 -010350 -010394 -010426 000000001475333015429058 18238046 00000000 00000000 14793937 14725499 14786885 00000000 00000000 19362224 14761153 00000000 00000000 14708063 14471035 00000000 00000000 15410304 15410304 14702001 14042984 15919433 18238046 14424614 15410304 15319048 00000000 00000000 17808528 14719065 14726539 00000000 13692121 00000000 00000000 15939186 14419506 17282758 14747121 15461300 15461300 00000000 15377685 14724092 00000000 00000000 13915514 14732221 15448761 14747121 00000000 14753538 LAUER HOMES, INC.VAN HEEL BROS CONSTRUCTION SELA ROOFING HESVIA HOMES INC TERRY THOMAS J DESIGNER DECKS INC OUTDOOR DESIGNS POOL CONCEPTS CARPENTRY ASPECTS CONST ORCHARD BUILDERS INC. WESTERN CEDAR SUPPLY WESTERN CEDAR SUPPLY CHRISTIANS INC METRO HANDYMAN TRENDY ROOFING & SONS INC SELA ROOFING HUEPENBECKER CONSTRUCTION WESTERN CEDAR SUPPLY TOP LINE CONSTRUCTION M & S ROOFING INCLINE ENTBRRISES SMITH WP ROOFING J MICHAEL CONST INC STONEHENGE CONSTRUCTION SOFT TOUCH DEMOLITION HAUENSTEIN & BRMBISTBR LAKE COUNTRY BUILDERS GIBRTSBN COMPANY GIBRTSEN CCWPANY W JONES CONST MINNESOTA EXTERIORS STONBHOUSE DESIGNS LINDSTROM CONSTRUCTION LAKE COUNTRY BUILDERS CUTTING EDGE CONST INC WINSLOW 1,500,000.00GLEASON73,000.00 SAHLSTRCm 25,500.00 NASIBDLAK 700.00 SUPALLA 3,000.00 PARKS 6,000.00 WBILBR 7,500.00 ROSSTBDT 5,000.00 LANPHBR 25,000.00 GAUSS 1,321.00 HASSBLQUIST 11,000.00 LUCAS 15,000.00 MCCARTY 2,000.00 WALTON 2,000.00 STARKMAN 20,000.00 CORNELIUS 2,000.00 MACKAY 34,000.00 . SILUS 3,000.00 THORA 3,900.00 KING 3,200.00 WARDEN 1,000.00 UPTON 2,400.00 MOLSATHBR 4,500.00 BYERS 11,800.00 HILB 4,600.00 WBIST 4,053.00 ST LAWRENCE 2,600.00 BLOMS 3,000.00 LAGUB 1,500.00 103,000.00 PETTIPIECE 1,200.00 SPILSBTH 5,500.00 WITHER 7,200.00 BRICKOSN 4,500.00 GBPPRB 2,600.00 MBNGB 700.00 NEWMAN .00 REINHOLDT .ill 00».00 19,800.00 JOHNSON 1,200.00 RICHARDS 27,000.00 PUTNAM 27,000.00 VAUGHAN 20,000.00 HUTTER 6,000.00 3 ALBRECHT 2,500.00 NUSBAUM 500.00 LBMIRB 4,000.00 KROGER 12,930.00 GRAHAM 27,000.00 FRANK 66,815.91 CUNNINGTON 45,000.00 SAIKI 9,500.00 DALE 46,000.00 .^J MON, JUL €, 1998, 4:50 PMPERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OP PERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET JUNE 1998ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY PAGE 2OWNER LAST NM VALUATION ► BL .29 3405 LIVINGSTON AVE 98/06/29 OR-010429 00000000 PATTEN 3,000.00 30 2801 POX ST 98/06/10 OR-010349 14461345 TONY EBERT BUILDERS KLUTH 75,000.00 56C 56C ME 01 500 HUNTER PASS 98/06/03 OR-010317 39414211 KJ jEVE HTG Sl AC BROWN 15,700.00 01 1491 SHORELINE DR 98/06/03 OR-010320 35453797 FIREPLACE CENTER KIBRNAN 7,000.00 01 2225 DEVIN LA 98/06/08 OR-010339 34789558 DITTER INC HARTPIBL 750.00 01 1331 NORTH ARM DR 98/06/08 OR-010341 35453797 FIREPLACE CENTER 1,000.00 01 3135 JAMESTOWN RD 98/06/08 OR-010344 39296767 VOGT FRED & CO LURTON 1,300.00•01 2815 DEER RUN TR 98/06/10 OR-010353 39414211 KLEVE HTG & AC 12,800.00 01 4725 BAYSIDE RD 98/06/10 OR-010359 36332561 FIRESIDE CORNER 1,100.00 01 500 HUNTER PASS 98/06/11 OR-010360 35339129 A & E MASONRY 8,250.00 01 4423 NORTH SHORE DR 98/06/15 OR-010376 35603349 DELMAR FURNACE EXCHANGE MILLER 1,000.00 OOl 3245 LAFAYETTE RIDGE CT 98/06/15 OR-010377 35603349 DELMAR FURNACE EXCHANGE GARON 700.00 01 1331 NORTH ARM DR 98/06/15 OR-010379 35453797 FIREPLACE CENTER 1,000.00 01 1331 NORTH ARM DR 98/06/22 OR-010392 36332561 FIRESIDE CORNER BEUTLBR 1,100.00 01 4725 BAYSIDE RD 98/06/25 OR-010413 37012539 R & S WUNDBRWOOD HTG & A/C 8,725.00 01 3465 LYRIC AVE 98/06/25 OR-010416 38819000 SEDGWICK HTG U AC CO HANSBERGBR 2,745.00 02 985 EDGEWOOD HILLS RD 98/06/03 OR-010316 38693213 MIDLAND HTG & AC INC BOWEN 7,200.00 02 1056 LOMA LINDA AVE 98/06/15 OR-010300 35453797 FIREPLACE CENTER HOLCOUMBB 2,000.00 02 3045 6TH AVE N 98/06/25 OR-010415 35378491 SUPERIOR CONTR INC RYDER 1,500.00 03 940 BROWN RD S 98/06/03 OR-010312 39414211 KLEVE HTG & AC JOHNSON 14,500.00 19 1050 TAMARACK DR 98/06/15 OR-010378 34884032 CONSTRUCTION MECHANICAL SE 9,000.00 24 3155 CASCO CIR 98/06/03 OR-010323 34760351 SUNBURST HEATING & AC ROBBRTACCIO 1,500.00 24 1398 REST PT RD 98/06/10 OR-010352 34458585 RON'S MECH INC JOHNSON 1,500.00 24 1075 KNOLL MANOR RD 98/06/12 OR-010364 34458585 RON'S MECH INC CLEVELAND 1,500.00 24 109 HACKBERRY HILL 98/06/12 OR-010365 34789558 DITTER INC SCHMID 3,184.00 24 3650 CASCO AVE 98/06/12 OR-010366 38949898 WENZEL HEATING & AC GBRSOVITZ 4,500.00 •24 4075 OAK ST 98/06/15 OR-010367 38711491 A-ABC APPLIANCE & HEATING BOWMAN 4,569.44 24 25 BROWN RD S 98/06/25 OR-010414 24738793 CITYVIEW PLBG & HTG BITTMAN 1,886.00 2€C 26C i PL 01 801 PERNDALE RD N 98/06/01 OR-010298 29335636 DUDA, LEON PLUMBING SERV.NELSON 150.00 01 95 LEAP ST 98/06/04 OR-010327 24739221 WAYZATA PLBG fit HTG INC GRAHAM 1,000.00 01 480 OLD LONG LAKE RD 98/06/05 OR-010337 24248455 MACK PLUMBING LBJBUNB 150.00 01 3770 BAYSIDE RD 98/06/10 OR-010358 25433994 S T PLUMBING STEPHENS 6,620.00 01 465 HUNTER PASS 98/06/11 OR-010361 29335636 DUDA, LEON PLUMBING SERV.150.00 01 500 HUNTER PASS 98/06/15 OR-010374 29337717 THOMPSON PLBG 21,000.00 01 2280 SHADOWOOD DR 98/06/15 OR-010375 24972124 SUNRISE PLBG INC 6,980.00 01 395 PERNDALE RD N 98/06/24 OR-010407 24340445 CLEARWATER SYSTEMS BREN 1,300.00 01 4725 BAYSIDE RD 98/06/24 OR-010410 27391048 NELSON WATER INC MORGAN 5,000.00 01 395 PERNDALE RD N 98/06/25 OR-010417 29383589 STANDARD PLBG fit APPL CO .00 01 35 CRYSTAL CREEK RD 98/06/30 OR-010436 24701208 STEINKRAUS PLBG INC KOEHLER 13,000.00 01 2106 SUGARWOOD DR 98/06/30 OR-010439 2 9335636 DUDA| LEON PLUMBING SERV•SCHOMMBR 150.00 02 1790 SHADYWOOD RD 98/06/03 OR-010318 25510555 MR ROOTER URBAN 700.00 02 3135 JAMESTOWN RD 98/06/23 OR-010399 27735740 DINIUS PLUMBING LURTON 5,110.00 19 725 6TH AVE N 98/06/04 OR-010325 24646281 LAMBRE PLUMBING fit HEATING 55,400.00 19 2500 SHADYWOOD RD 98/06/23 OR-010403 23331515 L B P MECHANICAL 9,850.00 24 539 KEENE AVE 98/06/03 OR-010319 24216140 MR ROOTER OF ANOKA COUNTY ERICKSON 1,172.38 24 865 PERNDALE RD W 98/06/12 OR-010363 28663057 SOUTHTOWN PLBG LINDBBRG 6,000.00 24 2695 PHEASANT RD 98/06/17 OR-010382 24490147 CUSTOM PLUMBING, INC.REDDICK 600.00 24 2703 WALTERS PORT LA 98/06/25 OR-010412 28274033 NORBLOM PLUMBING CO REESE 500.00 29 650 TONKAWA RD 98/06/03 OR-010322 24490147 CUSTOM PLUMBING, INC.ADAIR 600.00 29 109 HACKBERRY HILL 98/06/09 OR-010346 24490147 CUSTOM PLUMBING, INC.SCHMID 512.00 \ .1*MON, JUL 6, 1998, 4:50 PMPERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF PERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET PAGE 3JUNE 1998ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATIONOR-010421 24735349 DAY HAROLD E & SON SERENA 4,500.00OR-010347 25610325 A-ABLE PLUMBING COMPANY BUSCH 500.00OR-010259 54287393 PATNODE BROTHERS CUDD .00 OR-010201 57803407 SANDD EXCAVATING INC HOCHRADEL .00 OR-010301 00000000 CLARK .00 OR-010303 54791762 HAYES EXCAVATING COLEMAN .00 OR-010304 54791762 HAYES EXCAVATING .00 OR-010305 54791762 HAYES EXCAVATING .00 OR-010306 54791762 HAYES EXCAVATING .00 OR-010307 00000000 GREENLEY .00 OR-010313 54734300 SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICE CLARK . 00 OR-010314 54734300 SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICE GREENLEY .00 OR-010332 54775649 RITTER EXCAVATING CARLSTEN .00 OR-010340 00000000 BEHRMAN .00 OR-010387 24461495 WIDMER INC REINHOLD .00 OR-010396 24461495 WIDMER INC BREN .00 OR-010402 25334357 PLYMOUTH PLUMBING .00 OR-010411 54791069 INGELSIDB ENGINEERING BEHRMAN .00 OR-010419 00000000 BREN . 00 OR-010420 14750910 BRUCE BREN HOMES BREN . 00 OR-010422 54775649 RITTER EXCAVATING LUCAS . 00 OR-010423 54775649 RITTER EXCAVATING LUCAS .00 OR-010425 00000000 GARDNER .00 OR-010437 54734300 SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICE TRUMAN .00 OR-010430 54734300 SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICE TRUMAN . 00 OR-010310 09411130 AQUA ENGINEERING, INC.NELSON .00 OR-010311 04792505 GENERAL SERVICE LEJEUNE .00 OR-010315 04020205 WINDSOR COMPANIES MCGUIRE .00 OR-010372 09411130 AQUA ENGINEERING, INC..00 OR-010390 04450259 BNR IRRIGATION JACOBSON .00 OR-010391 04450259 BNR IRRIGATION SUMMERS .00 OR-010409 04461770 TEMACA BOSTON .00 OR-010297 14751229 KEENAN £l SVEIVEN INC LUNDELL . 00 OR-010404 00000000 FLOYD .00 OR-010420 00000000 IVERSON .00 OR-010320 10736373 BUSSE CONSTRUCTION MCCARTNEY .00 OR-010329 10736373 BUSSE CONSTRUCTION .00 24C 23C UD 12C 141C 299924C01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 23C 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 22 22 22 23 23 12C 460512652815 315 1575 4650 500 3580 140 1485 1575 1485 1920 340 3551 395 1540 340 395 395 1060 1060 1486 1570 1570 801 480 315 465 127 75 1840 3211 960 2835 755 275 WATERTOWN RD SHORELINE DRDEER RUN TR WOODHILL RD LONG LAKE BLVD CREEKWOOD TR HUNTER PASS WATERTOWN RD GOLDEN VIEW DR LONG LAKE BLVD LONG LAKE BLVD LONG LAKE BLVD COUNTRY CLUB RD LEAF ST LIVINGSTON AVE FERNDALE RD N BOHNS PT RD LEAF ST FERNDALE RD N FERNDALE RD N BROWN RD N BROWN RD N LONG LAKE BLVD LONG LAKE BLVD LONG LAKE BLVD FERNDALE RD N OLD LONG LAKE RD WOODHILL RD HUNTER PASS CHEVY CHASE DR CRYSTAL CREEK RD SHADYWOOD RD BAYSIDE RD FERNDALE RD W CASCO POINT RD HUNT FARM RD MCCULLEY RD 98/06/02 98/06/18 98/06/02 98/06/02 98/06/02 98/06/02 98/06/02 98/06/02 98/06/03 98/06/03 98/06/05 98/06/08 98/06/18 98/06/23 98/06/23 98/06/24 98/06/25 98/06/25 98/06/26 98/06/26 98/06/26 98/06/30 98/06/30 98/06/03 98/06/03 98/06/03 98/06/15 98/06/19 98/06/19 98/06/24 98/06/01 98/06/23 98/06/29 98/06/04 98/06/03 2,854,473.73* MON, JUL 6, x998, 4:49 PMNUMERICAL LISTING JUNE 1998PERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET PAGE 1WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATIONOR-010195 OR-010235 OR-010253 OR-010259 OR-010263 OR-010280 OR-0I0281 OR-010282 OR-010295 OR-010296 OR-010297 OR-010298 OR-010299 OR-010300 OR-010301 OR-010302 OR-010303 OR-010304 OR-010305 OR-010306 OR-010307 OR-010310 OR-010311 OR-010312 OR-010313 OR-0X0314 OR-010315 OR-010316 OR-010317 OR-010318 OR-010319 OR-010320 OR-010321 OR-010322 OR-010323 OR-010324 OR-010325 OR-010326 OR-010327 OR-010328 OR-010329 OR-010330 OR-010331 OR-010332 OR-010335 OR-010336 OR-010337 OR-010338 OR-010339 OR-010340 OR-010341 OR-010344 OR-010345 OR-010346 98/06/03 N 98/06/03 N 98/06/01 N 98/06/02 N 98/06/01 N 98/06/02 N 98/06/18 N 98/06/04 N 98/06/01 N 98/06/01 N 98/06/01 N 98/06/01 N 98/06/02 N 98/06/03 N 98/06/02 N 98/06/02 N 98/06/02 N 98/06/02 N 98/06/02 N 98/06/02 N 98/06/02 N 98/06/03 N 98/06/03 N 98/06/03 N 98/06/03 N 98/06/03 N 98/06/03 N 98/06/03 N 98/06/03 N 98/06/03 N 98/06/03 N 98/06/03 N 98/06/03 N 98/06/03 N 98/06/03 N 98/06/09 N 98/06/04 N 98/06/04 N 98/06/04 N 98/06/04 N 98/06/03 N 98/06/16 N 98/06/11 N 98/06/05 N 98/06/05 N 98/06/05 N 98/06/05 N 98/06/08 N 98/06/08 N 98/06/08 N 98/06/08 N 98/06/08 N 98/06/12 N 98/06/09 N 1370323734652815 160 2500 315 95 2405 4080 3211 801 960 3580 1575 1040 4650 500 3580 140 1485 801 480 940 1575 1485 315 985 500 1790 539 1491 1145 650 3155 129 725 2120 95 755 275 2595 825 1920 1015 1005 480 245 2225 340 1331 3135 3480 109 FRENCH CREEK DR CASCO CIR CRYSTAL PL DEER RUN TR WEAR LA N SHADYWOOD RD WOODHILL RD LEAP ST DUNWOODY AVE DAHL RD BAYSIDE RD FERNDALB RD N TONKAWA RD BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE BLVD TONKAWA RD CRS'^KWOOD TR HUNTER PASS WATERTOWN RD GOLDEN VIEW DR LONG LAKE BLVD FERNDALB RD N OLD LONG LAKE RD BROWN RD S LONG LAKE BLVD LONG LAKE BLVD WOODHILL RD EDGBWOOD HILLS RI HUNTER PASS SHADYWOOD RD KEENE AVE SHORELINE DR 6TH AVE N TONKAWA RD CASCO CIR CHEVY CHASE DR 6TH AVE N WEBBER HILLS RD LEAF ST HUNT FARM RD MCCULLEY RD LYDIARD CIR FOREST ARMS LA COUNTRY CLUB RD LINDEN LA LINDEN LA OLD LONG LAKE RD TONKA AVE DEVIN LA LEAP ST NORTH ARM DR JAMESTOWN RD NORTH SHORE DR HACKBERRY HILL 08 19362224 06 00000000 29 13915514 01 54287393 06 00000000 19 17282758 01 57803407 29 14732221 11 00000000 11 14708063 22 14751229 01 29335636 11 14471035 01 00000000 01 00000000 01 14753330 01 54791762 01 54791762 01 54791762 01 54791762 01 00000000 01 89411138 01 84792585 03 39414211 01 54734300 01 54734300 01 84820205 02 38693213 01 39414211 02 25510555 24 24216140 01 35453797 11 00000000 29 24490147 24 34760351 03 18238046 19 24646281 11 00000000 01 24739221 23 18736373 23 18736373 29 15448761 06 14793937 01 54775649 11 15410304 11 1541U304 01 24248455 10 00000000 01 34709558 01 00000000 01 35453797 01 39296767 24 00000000 29 24490147 OUTDOOR DESIGNSMINNESOTA EXTERIORS PATNODE BROTHERS HAUENSTEIN k BRMEISTER SANDD EXCAVATING INC STONEHOUSE DESIGNS CARPENTRY ASPECTS CONST KEENAN fit SVEIVEN INC DUDA, LEON PLUMBING SERV. ORCHARD BUILDERS INC. LAUER HAYES HAYES HAYES HAYES HOMES, INC EXCAVATING EXCAVATING EXCAVATING EXCAVATING AQUA ENGINEERING, INC. GENERAL SERVICE KLEVE HTG k AC SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICE SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICE WINDSOR COMPANIES MIDLAND HTG k AC INC KLEVE HTG k AC MR ROOTER MR ROOTER OF ANOKA COUNTY FIREPLACE CENTER CUSTOM PLUMBING, INC. SUNBURST HEATING k AC SELA ROOFING LAMERB PLUMBING k HEATING WAYZATA PLBG k HTG INC BUSSE CONSTRUCTION BUSSE CONSTRUCTION LINDSTROM CONSTRUCTION HESVIA HOMES INC RITTER EXCAVATING WESTERN CEDAR SUPPLY WESTERN CEDAR SUPPLY MACK PLUMBING DITTER INC FIREPLACE CENTER VOGT FRED k CO CUSTOM PLUMBING, INC. HASSELQUIST 11,000.00NASIEDLAK700.00KROGER12,930.00CUDD.00SUPALLA3,000.00 19,800.00 HOCHRADEL .00 GRAHAM 27,000.00 WALTON 2,000.00 STARKMAN 20,000.00 LUNDELL .00 NELSON 150.00 CORNELIUS 2,000.00 MADSON 300,000.00 CLARK .00 WINSLOW 1,500,000.00 COLEMAN .00 .00 .00 .00 GREENLEY .00 NELSON .00 LEJEUNE .00 JOHNSON 14,500.00 CLARK .00 GREENLEY .00 MCGUIRE .00 BOWEN 7,200.00 BROWN 15,700.00 URBAN 700.00 ERICKSON 1,172.38 KIBRNAN 7,000.00 MACKAY 34,000.00 ADAIR 600.00 ROBERTACCIO 1,500.00 SAHLSTROM 25.500.00 55.400.00 SILUS 3,000.00 GRAHAM 1,000.00 MCCARTNEY .00 .00 FRANK 66,815.91 PARKS 6,000.00 CARLSTEN .00 THORA 3,900.00 KING 3,200.00 LEJEUNE 150.00 MCCARTY 2,000.00 HARTPIEL 750.00 BEHRMAN .00 1,000.00 LURTON 1,300.00 NUSBAUM 500.00 SCHMID 512.00 MON, JUL 6, 1996, 4:49 PMNUMERICAL LISTING JUNE 1998PERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET PAGE 2WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATIONOR-010347 OR-010348 OR-010349 OR-010350 OR-010351 OR-010352 OR-010353 OR-010354 OR-010355 OR-010357 OR-010358 OR-010359 OR-010360 OR-010361 OR-010362 OR-010363 OR-010364 OR-010365 OR-0I0366 OR-010367 OR-010369 OR-010370 OR-010371 OR-010372 OR-010373 OR-010374 OR-010375 OR-010376 OR-010377 OR-010378 OR-010379 OR-010380 OR-010381 OR-010382 OR-010383 OR-010384 OR-010388 OR-010387 OR-010388 OR-010389 OR-010390 OR-010391 OR-010392 OR-010393 OR-010394 OR-010395 OR-010396 OR-010397 OR-010398 OR-010399 OR-010400 OR-010401 OR-010402 OR-010403 98/06/09 N 98/06/09 N 98/06/10 N 98/06/11 N 98/06/11 N 98/06/10 N 98/06/10 N 98/06/10 N 98/06/10 N 98/06/16 N 98/06/10 N 98/06/10 N 98/06/11 N 98/06/11 N 98/06/12 N 98/06/12 N 98/06/12 N 98/06/12 N 98/06/12 N 98/06/15 N 98/06/15 N 98/06/15 N 98/06/15 N 98/06/15 N 98/06/15 98/06/lL 4^ 98/06/15 N 98/06/15 N 98/06/15 Y 98/06/15 N 98/06/15 N 98/06/15 N 98/06/17 N 98/06/17 N 98/06/19 N 98/06/24 N 98/06/18 N 98/06/18 N 98/06/18 N 98/06/18 N 98/06/19 N 98/06/19 N 98/06/22 N 98/06/22 N 98/06/25 N 98/06/23 N 98/06/23 N 98/06/23 N 98/06/23 N 98/06/23 N 98/06/23 N 93/06/23 N 98/06/23 N 98/06/23 N 1265113528012300 4205 1398 2815 4395 1360 2740 3770 4725 500 465 3685 865 1075 109 3650 4075 3243 2765 3285 465 3083 500 2280 4423 3245 1050 1331 1056 2790 2695 140 340 1655 3551 1920 253 127 75 1331 4195 2874 3440 395 2138 765 3135 3540 770 1540 2500 SHORELINE DR NORTH ARM DR POX ST POX ST POREST LAKE DR REST PT RD DEER RUN TR NORTH SHORE DR NORTH ARM DR CAROLINE AVE BAYSIDE RD BAYSIDE RD HUNTER PASS HUNTER PASS NORTH SHORE DR PERNDALE RD W KNOLL MANOR RD HACKBERRY HILL CASCO AVE OAK ST CASCO CIR CASCO POINT RD CARMAN RD HUNTER PASS PAIRVIBW LA HUNTER PASS SHADOWOOD DR NORTH SHORE DR LAFAYETTE RIDGE CT TAMARACK DR NORTH ARM DR LOMA LINDA AVE SILVER VIEW DR PHEASANT RD HACKBERRY HILL TURNHAM RD BOHNS PT RD LIVINGSTON AVE CONCORDIA ST CYGNET PL CHEVY CHASE DR CRYSTAL CREEK RD NORTH ARM DR POREST LAKE DR CASCO POINT RD BAYSIDE kJ) PERNDALE KD N SHADYWOOD RD OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N JAMESTOWN RD NORTH SHORE DR BROWN RD N BOHNS PT RD SHADYWOOD RD 99 25610325 06 14725499 30 14461345 29 14747121 24 00000000 24 34458585 01 39414211 11 14702001 21 14747121 06 14786885 01 25433994 01 36332561 01 35339129 01 29335636 11 14042984 24 28663057 24 34458585 24 34789558 24 38949898 24 38711491 21 15461300 21 15461300 11 15919433 01 89411138 11 18238046 01 29337717 01 24972124 01 35603349 01 35603349 19 34884032 01 35453797 02 35453797 11 14424614 24 24490147 02 15429058 15 00000000 16 15939186 01 24461495 11 15410304 11 15319048 01 84450259 01 04450259 01 36332561 11 00000000 29 00000000 21 00000000 01 24461495 11 OOOOUOOO 11 17808528 02 27735740 11 14719065 21 15377605 01 25334357 19 23331515 A-ABLE PLUMBING COMPANY TERRY THOMAS J TONY EBERT BUILDERS LAKE COUNTRY BUILDERS RON'S MECH INC KLEVE HTG k AC CHRISTIANS INC LAKE COUNTRY BUILDERS DESIGNER DECKS INC S T PLUMBING FIRESIDE CORNER A fit E MASONRY DUDA, LEON PLUMBING SERV. METRO HANDYMAN SOUTHTOWN PLBG RON'S MECH INC DITTER INC WENZEL HEATING fit AC A-ABC APPLIANCE fit HEATING GIERTSEN COMPANY GIERTSEN COMPANY TRENDY ROOFING fit SONS INC AQUA ENGINEERING, INC. SELA ROOFING THOMPSON PLBG SUNRISE PLBG INC DELMAR FURNACE EXCHANGE DELMAR FURNACE EXCHANGE CONSTRUCTION MECHANICAL SE FIREPLACE CENTER FIREPLACE CENTER HUEPENBECKER CONSTRUCTION CUSTOM PLUMBING, INC. VAN HEEL BROS CONSTRUCTION STONEHENGE CONSTRUCTION WIDMER INC WESTERN CEDAR SUPPLY TOP LINE CONSTRUCTION BNR IRRIGATION BNR IRRIGATION FIRESIDE CORNER WIDMER INC M fit S ROOFING DINIUS PLUMBING INCLINE ENTERRISES W JONES CONST PLYMOUTH PLUMBING L B P MECHANICAL BUSCHWEILERKLUTHCUNNINGTON LEMIRE JOHNSON WARDEN JOHNSON ROSSTEDT STEPHENS UPTON LINDBBRG CLEVELAND SCHMID GERSOVITZ BOWMAN RICHARDS PUTNAM MOLSATHER BYERS MILLER GARON HOLCOUMBB HILB REDDICK GLEASON MBNGB NEWMAN RBINHOLD WEIST ST LAWRENCE JACOBSON SUMMERS BEUTLER BLOMS SAIKI VAUGHAN BREN LAGUE LURTON PETTIPIECB HUTTER 500.007.500.0075.000. 0045.000. 00 4.000. 00 1.500.00 12,800.00 1.000. 00 1.200.00 5.000. 00 6,620.00 1,100.00 8.250.00 150.00 2.400.00 6.000. 00 1.500.00 3.184.00 4.500.00 4,569.44 27.000. 00 27.000. 00 4.500.00 .00 11,800.00 21.000. 00 6.980.00 1,000.00 700.00 9,000.00 1,000.00 2,000.00 4.600.00 600.00 73.000. 00 700.00 .00 .00 4.053.00 2.600.00 .00 .00 1,100.00’ 3.000. 00 9.500.00 20.000. 00 .00 1.500.00 103,000.00 5.110.00 1.200.00 6.000. 00 .00 . 9,850.00 MON, JUL 6, 1998, 4:49 PMNUMERICAL LISTING 'JUNE 1998PERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET PAGE 3WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION FLOYD .00 LANPHER 25,000.00 GAUSE 1,321.00 BREN 1,300.00 SPILSETH 5,500.00 BOSTON .00 MORGAN 5,000.00 BEHRMAN .00 REESE 500.00 8,725.00 BITTMAN 1,886.00 RYDER 1,500.00 HANSBERGER 2,745.00 .00 ALBRECHT 2,500.00 BREN .00 BREN .00 SERENA 4,500.00 LUCAS .00 LUCAS .00 REINHOLDT 1,000.00 GARDNER .00 DALE 46,000.00 WITHER 7,200.00 IVERSON .00 PATTEN 3,000.00 LUCAS 15,000.00 KOEHLER 13,000.00 TRUMAN .00 TRUMAN .00 SCHOMMER 150.00 ERICKOSN 4,500.00 GEFFRE 2,600.00 OR-010404 OR-010405 OR-010406 OR-010407 OR-010408 OR-010409 OR-010410 OR-010411 OR-010412 OR-010413 OR-010414 OR-010415 OR-010416 OR-010417 OR-010418 OR-010419 OR-010420 OR-010421 OR-010422 OR-010423 OR-010424 OR-010425 OR-010426 OR-010427 OR-010428 OR-010429 OR-010435 OR-010436 OR-010437 OR-010438 OR-010439 OR-010440 OR-010441 141C 98/06/23 N 98/06/29 N 98/06/25 N 98/06/24 N 98/06/24 N 98/06/24 N 98/06/24 N 98/06/24 N 98/06/25 N 98/06/25 N 98/06/25 N 98/06/25 N 98/06/25 N 98/06/25 N 98/06/25 N 98/06/25 N 98/06/25 N 98/06/26 N 98/06/26 N 98/06/26 N 98/06/26 N 98/06/26 N 98/06/29 N 98/06/29 N 98/06/29 N 98/06/29 N 98/06/30 N 98/06/30 N 98/06/30 N 98/06/30 N 98/06/30 N 98/06/30 N 98/06/30 N 960 1359 480 395 3233 1840 4725 340 2703 4725 25 3045 3465 395 4545 395 395 4605 1060 1060 3551 1486 4085 2425 2835 3405 3250 35 1570 1570 2106 2205 4665 FERNDALE RD W PARK DR STUBBS BAY RD N FERNDALE RD N CASCO CIR SHADYWOOD RD BAYSIDE RD LEAF ST WALTERS PORT LA BAYSIDE RD BROWN RD S 6TH AVE N LYRIC AVE FERNDALE RD N NORTH SHORE DR FERNDALE RD N FERNDALE RD N WATERTOWN RD BROWN RD N BROWN RD N LIVINGSTON AVE LONG LAKE BLVD WATERTOWN RD DUNWOODY AVE CASCO POINT RD LIVINGSTON AVE FOX ST CRYSTAL CREEK RD LONG LAKE BLVD LONG LAKE BLVD SUGARWOOD DR SHADYWOOD RD BAYSIDE RD 22 00000000 06 00000000 06 00000000 01 24340445 11 14726539 01 84461778 01 27391048 01 54791869 24 28274033 01 37012539 24 24738793 02 35378491 01 38819000 01 29383589 21 14724092 01 00000000 01 14750918 29 24735349 01 54775649 01 54775649 16 14419506 01 00000000 29 14753538 11 00000000 22 00000000 29 00000000 09 14761153 01 24701208 01 54734300 01 54734300 01 29335636 11 13692121 11 00000000 A/C CLEARWATER SYSTEMS SMITH WF ROOFING TEMACA NELSON WATER INC INGELSIDE ENGINEERING NORBLOM PLUMBING CO R k S WUNDERWOOD HTG & CITYVIEW PLBG & HTG SUPERIOR CONTR INC SEDGWICK HTG k AC CO STANDARD PLBG k APPL CO HOME IMPROVEMENT SPECIALIS BRUCE BREN HOMES DAY HAROLD E k SON RITTER EXCAVATING RITTER EXCAVATING SOFT TOUCH DEMOLITION CUTTING EDGE CONST INC POOL CONCEPTS STEINKRAUS PLBG INC SULLIVAN’S UTILITY SERVICE SULLIVAN’S UTILITY SERVICE DUDA, LEON PLUMBING SERV. J MICHAEL CONST INC »/wi t. 01 Residence 2402Addition2503Garage/Attached 2604Garage/Detached .27 05 Porch 2806Deck29 07 Fence 3008Gazebo31 09 Pool 3210Re-side 33 11 Re-roof 3412Tennis Court 13 Sign 14 Dock 15 Shed 16 Demo-Principal Structure 17 Demo-Accessory Structure 18 Move 19 Commercial 20 Ins'titutional 21 Storm Damage Repair221-100 Cubic Yards 23 101 Cubic Yards or More 99 Undefined Replacing ExistingLifting Principal Residence Well Abandonment Foundation Only Temporary Trailer Renovate/Remodel Accessory Structure Stairway to Lake Retaining Wall Entrance Monuments Tree Removal LOCAL DSB CODES 9999 Undefined i JUNE 1998REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 *****PERMIT ISSUED REPORT PAGE:DATE OF RUN 07/06/98 OTTODCM'T CITY OF ORONO REQUESTER;CAROLEPERMIT TYPE QTY 06/01/98 - BASE FEE ------06/30/98VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY 06/01/97 - BASE FEE 06/30/97VALUATION PLAN REVIEW User Defined SUBDIVISION 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 350.00 0.00 0.00 VARIANCE 8 2,050.00 0.00 0.00 15 3,650.00 0.00 0.00 CUP 3 175.00 0.00 0.00 3 750.00 0.00 0.00 SKETCH PLAN 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 250.00 0.00 0.00 VARIANCE/CUP 1 225.00 0.00 0.00 1 250.00 0.00 0.00 VACATI(»I 1 300.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 13*2,750.00*0.00*0.00*21*5,250.00*0.00*0.00* Grand'total 13**2,750.00**0.00**0.00**21**5,250.00** 0.00**0.00** REPORT NBR. BPEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 07/06/98 ***** permit fee REPORT »***• CITY OP ORONO FROM 06/01/98 TO 06/30/98 PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE ,, USER REPORT TOTAL BASE FEB 2,750.00 2,750.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEB 0.00 0.00 SAC 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 ESCROW 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 2,750.00 2,750.00 Clinton A. Miller 375 Silver Meadow Drive Long Lake, MN 55356 ■ July 22, 1998 Mr. Gabriel Jabbour Mayor City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Dear Mayor Jabbour: TTiank you for meeting with my neighborhood group and MN/DOT at my home on June 16*. I appreciate the time that you, Ed Callahan, Jim Murphy, and the MN/DOT team spent to meet with us to review MN/DOT’s visualization study and preliminary design information of the TH 12 project as it impacts our property. Thank you also for your July 15, 1998 letter (from Ron Morse) in which the City offers us assistance in ensuring fair and reasonable treatment in the right-of-way acquisition process. I am writing to ask the City to assist us. Please be advised that it is our desire to be fairly and equitably relocated in Orono. We have no interest in attempting to impact MN/DOT’s design to create a scenario under which we would continue to occupy our property. I am asking the City to consider assisting us in two ways: Definitive total fvs. oartian taking of our property . Of the three design scenarios (1:1 slope, 1:2 slope, or retaining wall) the approximate remainder size of our property will be betw'een 1.35 and 1.73 acres. This will leave us significantly under the Orono residential zoning requirements for lot size. Additionally, the potential right-of-way acquisition lines appear as though they will infringe on our property improvements (such as the mound septic system). It seems to me that the City could declare the TH 12 impact on our property requires MN/DOT’s taking of our property be “total” based on City zoning requirements. Accelerated “hardship ” acquisition process. We love living in Orono, we have children in the Orono school system, and we desire to remain in this community. We anticipate that it will be a challenging process to replace our current home on a comparable economic basis given the current residential development trend toward the “high-end ” homes being built in our community. We will need significant lead time and a strong financial strategy to successfully relocate to comparable property in our community without significantly increasing our cost of housing. Perhaps the City could intervene on our behalf and acquire our property on an accelerated time line, or cause MN/DOT to do so, so that we could have as much time as possible to relocate. There may be other means by which the City could help us be treated fairly in this process. I am open to creative solutions to help us achieve our objective of relocating in Orono. It seems to me that a definitive position with respect to our property would enable MN/DOT to efficiently complete a quality and cost- effective design of TH 12 as it passes through our neighborhood. Clinton A. Miller 375 Silver Meadow Drive Long Lake, MN 55356 July 22,1998 Page Two Please advise me as to what the City will do to hrlji ui in this situation. CAM/tlj Home: 475-1092 Office: 912-8585 ext. 235 c: Mr. Thomas O’Keefe, P.E., MN/DOT Metro Division Ms. Patti Loken, P.E., MN/DOT Metro Division ^'^City Administrator Ron Moorse Councilmember Richard Flint Councilmember Charles Kelley Councilmember Barbara Peterson Councilmember and Orono Design Review Committee Member - J. Diann Goetten Orono Design Review Committee Member Ed Callahan Orono Design Review Committee Member Jim Murphy GlTYof ORONO Munldinl Oflkcs StrntMdreu: 2750 Kelley Pirlmay Orono. MN 55356 Maning Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 July 22,1998 To: Project Area Residents; Subject: Navarre Water Treatment Plant Rehabilitation The Orono City Council will hold an assessment hearing at 7:00 PJSL Monday August 10,1998 in the Orono Cit)i' Council Chambers to consider proposed assessments for rehabilitation of the Navarre Water Treatment Plant. The proposed assessment is $350 per unit for residential properties and $350 per sewer unit for commercial properties with a maximum of five units. Project Description This plant provides Iron and Manganese removal filtration and sofiening for the Navarre water system. The plant was originally constructed in 1971 and requires a major rehabilitation for continued effective operation. The existing control systems and the filter media in the plant are past their wrvice life vdiich has resulted in inconsistent water quality. One of the three softening units is urrently not operating because of corrosion problems. The existing ground water supply exceeds the recommended secondary drinking water standards for concentrations of both Iron and Manganese, and the water supply hardness levels arc above desirable standards. Rehabilitation and continued operation of this water treatment plant will provide for a long term consistently high quality water supply. Discontinuing operation of the pian^ will result in poor quality water that will exceed recommended standards. The high levels of Iron and Manganese in the raw water supply will cause discoloration, taste, and odor problems. Excessive levels of Manganese also causes deposit build up that reduces the capacity of the water supply pipes. The excessive hardness levels cause the bund up of calcium deposits in the supply system and plumbing fixtures, and result in less effective operation of home appliances. Tdephone (612) 473-7357 « FAX 473-0510 Project Funding 4 * The sources of funding for the water plant rehabilitation are as follows; 1. $200,000 fiom Water Fund Reserves. These reserves are available due to water rate increases in recent years that have enabled the City to set aside funds for major water system infrastructure rehabilitation. 2. S 269,000 internal loan from the Building Outlay Fund to be repaid from water operating revenues (reflected in water rates) 3. $295,000 from assessments in the Navarre water system service area This assessment will be payable over a maxmum five year period with interest The estimated yearly payment for this assessment at 6.5% interest is $75. Prepayment of the assessment without interest is allowed. In the past, water rates were not providing adequate funding for the City's water operating fund. Over the past several years, water rates have been increased on an annual basis to provide adequate funding for system depreciation and effective operation and maintenance of the water system. These new water rates have improved the status of the water fund and have provided cash reserves that can be used to finance part of the water plant rehabilitation project. Based on current trends, the City is planning on maintaining an annual water rate increase of 2.95% to provide for continued adequate funding for the water system. This will result in a yearly increase of approximately $2.5^ per quarter an average quarterly bill. Project Schedule July 1,1998 August 10,1998 August to November 1998 Receipt of Bids for Project Construction Assessment Hearing Order and Delivery of Equipment December IS98 to March 1999 Complete Project Construction. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Director of Public Services * m