Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-12-1998 Council Packetr AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JANUARY 12, 1998, 6*30 P M ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one (motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the AgendTSjkjiw^ailable in the Public Packet - located on the counter near the sign in sheet. ROLL CALL ^ ^ 299q 1.6:30 P.M. FERNDALE ROAD NOi.TH IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - v6MiC HEARING 2.CONSENT AGENDA 1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES *3. Regular Meeting of December 8, 1997 *4. Special Meeting of January 6, 1998 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS ifl)^ PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Elizabeth Hawn Representative PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 5.^2275 Ted & Myrna Wolf, 900 Willow Drive North - Class II Final Subdivision - Resolution MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT ENGINEER REPORT 6.Edgewoi^ Hills Sanitary Sewer Project - Accepting Feasibility Study and Ordering Public Hearing 7.Request for Payment ffl - County Road 6 Improvement CITY ADMINISTRATOR S REPORT / 8.Open Burning Policy Revisions and Ordinance Amendment 9.Promotion of Lin Vee to City Clerk 10.Appointment of Carole Haseman to Deputy Clerk 10a. Appointment to Full Time Secretary Position 11 .Appointment to Assistant Finance Director/MIS Coordinator Position 12.1998 Workers Compensation Insurance Bid Award 13.Establish Council Work Sessions 14.Annual Appointments - Resolution 15.Selection of Date for 1998 Local Board of Review Meeting 16.1998 Fee Schedule Ordinance Amendment 17.Special Assessment Deferral Renewal - Reapplication From Stubbs Bay Sanitary Sewer Project - Resolution CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JANUARY 12, 1998, 6:30 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MCS^SOTA y 18.LICENSES *19. BILLS UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 1998 01/12 01/12 01/19 01/20 01/26 02/02 02/04 02/09 02/16 02/17 02/23 Public Hearing 6:30 p.m. Ferndale Road North Improvement Project Council meeting 7:00 p.m. HOLIDAY -Office closed in observance of Martin Luther King, Jr. Day Tuesday - Planning Commission meeting 6:30 p.m. Council meeting 7:00 p.m. Park Commission meeting 7:15 p.m. Highway 12 Design Review Committee meeting 5:30 p.m. Council meeting 7:00 p.m. HOLIDAY - Office closed in observance of President's Day Tuesday, - Planning Commission meeting 6:30 p.m. Council meeting 7:00 p.m. 1 1 i -I nec.r Public A ttendance » b Meeting D ate - ^ ^ f ovn V ■ - > C ouncil Planning C ommission Park C ommission Other Please hll out the information REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NLIMBER /6~5~ /l/ /V/C 3.L ^ O 5 4. }/i u ^2\ Oj W~;C______________ijp ~i / \ Uv'. f jl vci 1,) Ra /v.) ^ -/c A/ QUL> f /rTTr > I ^ I V, F/cf^nihACe tlb ^ 8.9: Mu. 4 C)T'' cM 9. 10 A o-i c.\ A /?o ^ ^ 11.1 /'ey ' y> y’'^ y ?M }<L ( • ___/(0 ■' r /V I m 12./J c r> u- 13. /-/ // / /^R) /'A> i^c/ 14.'PC' f ^9 C /y'uM' $ ^ KS. Ki^C^y' Ki 'j i |V^ )( ^n j\!Ml |>-4 09U914 t Public A ttendance Meeting Date C ouncil Planning C ommission Park C ommission Other Please hll om the information REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER 2. 3. 4. CV1 e c. AAiwe l( dOimIc ¥ ^ y 9 'A' 5.. 6.. 7.. 8. 9. 10.. 11-. 12. 13. 14. 15. mm.4 CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ti hereby riven lha! the Orono Ci!V Council will hold a public hearino at 6:30 p.m. 00 Monday. Jan. 12.1998. in the Orono City Council Chambers. 2560 Kelley Padway. The purpose of the public hearing is to receive public comment regarding the proposed plan for reconstruction of Femdale ^ad from County Road 6 on the north to I- 394 on the south. . ^ ^All persons wishirig to be heard sre encouraged lo anend this meetirg. Wri^ en comments are solicited. Plans are availaole for review Mhe City offices. , ^ _ ,By Order of City Counal /s/ Dorothy M. Hallin City ClerH (Published in the Ltoiler/Pioneer Dec. 27, .997) Affidavit of Publication state of Minnesota, County of Hennepin. Bill Holm, being duly sworn on oath, says that he Is an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as THE LAKER, Mound, Minnesota, and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: A. ) The newspaper has complied with all the requirements constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. B. ) The printed notice of hearing —-__ Ferndale reconstruction _______ which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week for i successive v/eeks; It was first published Saturday fhft 27thriay nf Pecember _____ IQ 97 , and was thereafter printed and published every Saturday, to and including Saturday, the.day of- Authorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to me on this 27th day t}f December By: .1£B2 ^tary ^Bublic ..X KRISTI HOLM ••OTAirr PUBLIC . MNNCSOT4 WY COMMISSION EXPIRES JANUARY 31. 2000 JiatA (1) Lowest ctassilied rate paid by commercial users lor comparable space: $12.20 per inch. (2) Maximum rate allowed by law lor above matter: $12.20. (3) Rate actually charged lor above matter: S7.00 per inch. Each additional successive week: $5.05. CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE is hereby Qiven that the Orono City Council will hold a public hearing at 6:30 p.m. on Monday. Jan. 12.1998, in the Orono City Council Chambers. 2580 Kelley Parkway. The purpose of the public hearing is to receive public comment regarding the proposed plan for reconstruction of Ferndale Road from County Road 6 on the north to I- 394 on the south. All persons wishing to be heard are encouraged lo attend this meeting. Written comments are solicited. Rans are available for review in the City offices. By Order of City Cour>dl /s/ Dorothy M. Hallin City Clerk (Published in the Laker/Pioneer Dec. 27. 1997) Affidavit of Publication stale of Minnesota, County of Hennepin. Bill Holm, being duly sworn on oath, says that he is an auUiorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as THE LAKER. Mound. Minnesota, and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: A.) The newspaper has complied with all the requirements constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02. 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. B.) The printed. nofcirp of h^an'nij - - -Forndale reconstruction_ _ _ _ which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week for —1_, successive weeks: It was first published Saturday the. 27thdav ofDecember_____ 19_22_ and was thereafter printed and published every Saturday, to and including Saturday, Subscribed and sworn to me on this day of December ■Notary f^blic « JANUARVat 200o"'^ aaift »nrnrni3t|6ri (1) Low6St cl3ssifi6d r3l6 p3id by commerci3l us6rs for compsrsbie sp3ce: $12.20 per inch. (2) M3ximum r3te 3llowed by l3w for 3bove m3ffer: $12.20. (3) Rale actually charged lor above matter; $7.00 per inch. Each additional successive week: $5.05. C/ - ^REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION '' t'o,',.. ^'’OA'o DATE: January 12, 1998 ITEM NO.: / Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed: hu Agenda Section: Administrator ’s Report Item Description: Feradale Read North Public Hearing A work session was held this past week with the City Council to discuss the draft feasibility report for this project prepared by Bonestroo Engineers for the Cities of Orono and Plymouth. This is a draft report that has not been approved by either City at this time. This report is currently being reviewed by Plymouth City Staff and has not been presented to the City Council. This project will require the approval of both City Councils. The proposed concept presented in the feasibility report is for a 36' wide road with concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer, and a path on the east side of the road. The City Council expressed concerns about both the width of the proposed road and the State Aid funding split for this project. Solutions acceptable to both Cities will need to be reached on both the layout of the road and project funding. Our recommendation is to focus on obtaining an agreement on the road layout then discussing funding next, as the selected layout will impact the project costs. Several letters and a survey of project area residents have been received and are attached for your review. This information will also be forwarded to the City of Plymouth for their review. Mr. Fred Moore, Director of Public Works for the city of Plymouth will be out of town and unable to attend the public hearing. He will send a representative to the meeting. Based on the Council ’s concerns regarding the road layout and the written citizen comments received, we have discussed possible options for this project with Bonestroo Engineers and Plymouth City Staff. We have listed several possible options below for the road layout. All these options are for an urban design typical section with a bituminous path along the east side of the road. All of these options would be posted for no parking on both sides. Alt. 1: Draft Feasibility Report, 36' Wide Road With Two Travel Lanes and a Center Turn Lane The advantage of this option is that left turns are separated from the through traffic. This provides additional safety for left turning vehicles that need to stop before making their turn. This road has numerous driveways and access points -esulting in numerous turning movements. The disadvantages of this option are that right turning movements have to be made from the through traffic lane, and the through traffic will be at the edges of the road. This results in less room for bicycles and joggers along the edge ot the road. Previous experience has shown that the more experienced higher speed bike riders, and some joggers will use the road instead of the pedestrian oriented path. Alt. 2: 36' Wide Road with Two Travel Lanes This option would have ce''terline striping with two travel lanes. This is the same layout used on Dunkirk Lane in Plymouth. This option provider width for both left and right turning vehicles to move out of the through traffic flow when turning. The advantage is that turning vehicles *.ave enough space to be separated from the through traffic. Width for bicyclists is also provided, but through traffic may conflict with bikes when passing left turning vehicles. Alt. 3: 32' Wide Road with Two Travel Lanes and Striped Bicycle Lane This option has two 12 ’ wide travel lanes with a 4' wide striped bicycle lane along each side. This option does not provide space for turning vehicles to move out of the through traffic. The advantage of this option is increased safety for bicyclists and joggers using the dedicated lane. Femdale Road Nortli has a current average daily traffic count of 3,500 vehicles per day (vpd) with a 20-year projected volume of 5,000 /pd. This road is defined as a collector road, and the recommended state aid standard with parking on one side is for a 32 ’ wide road. This concept has been used such that the road is posted for no parking both sides and the 8’ parking lane is split into two 4' bicycle lanes. Alt. 4: 28 ’ Wide Road with Two Travel Lanes The recommended state aid standard for a road posted for no parking on both sides is 28 wide. The disadvantage of this option is that there is not room for a bicycle lane. Previous experience has shown that trails tend to be used by pedestrians and younger children on bicycles. Joggers and more experienced bicyclists will still use roads. Discussion with Plymouth City staff indicates that this option would not be viewed favorably by the city of Plymouth. They use a 32' width standard for residential streets and only reduce the width for low traffic residential streets in difficult reconstruction situations. Ferndale Road is a collector road and has considerably more traffic than the average residential street. This option is not recommended. Staff Recommendation At this time, we are proposing that the City Council provide a recommendation on the proposed layout for this road. This recommendation can then be forwarded to the City of Plymouth for consideration. Our staff recommendation is for a 32 ’ wide road with a 4 ’ striped bicycle lane on each side of the roadway. This option provides increased safety for bicyclists and joggers. The 12 wide striped travel lanes will make the road appear narrower to drivers and should help to reduce the concern about higher speed traffic on this road. This concept emphasizes the recreational nature of the road and decreases the perception of a high speed road. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Mot on to approve a proposed concept for the layout of Femdale Road North. C Mfflfiri LiXniTi MHiiiil WKiI=r7f tflEnciliTTfl •1W*| IF: [•P-Til.l e January 7,1998 Mr. Gregory A. Gappa Director of Public Services City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 ft -I of''< “ j. oftONO Dear Greg- Re: Fen.nale Road Improvement Project 1998 Capital Improvement Plan Thank you for your letter regarding the January 12 meeting. I regret that I will be out of town until January 19 and therefore I will be unable to attend. Please find enclosed the following documents: • Results of residents survey • Survey Form I apologize for the delay in forwarding this information to you. This information has been forwarded to each of the three cities. We received 266 responses to this survey from residents of Plymouth, Orono, and^ Wayzata. Ninety percent of respondents want a narrower road than that included in the cities proposal. Residents have chosen an alternative road concept: An 24 foot wide road (existing width), divided into 2 lanes An 8 foot path with a 2 foot median (on east side of road) An 6 ” cement curb and storm sewer • A 3 5 mph speed limit (a reduction of 5 mph from the current speed limit) • No on-street parking Please contact either Stewart Dietz, Martin Gardner, or myself if you have any questions. Our phone numbers are listed on the enclosures. Thank you! Sincerely, Mary M. King End cc: Orono City Council Members i/ FERNDALE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT RESULTS OF RESIDENTS SURVEY Dale: 11/8/97 Number of residents who responded: 266 Cities Proposal Alternative 1 10%) 36’ Road + BikeAValk Path 179 (67%) 24’ Road + BikeAValk Path Alternative 2 (23%) 24’ Road onlv The relative percentages were consistent for all three communities. FEEDBACK FROM SURVEY Based on feedback received from residents during the survey, we will modify Alternative 1 to include: • a 35 mph speed limit, instead of 30 mph___• an 8 foot path and 2 foot median So Alternative 1 is now: • An 24 foot wide road (e.\isting width), divided into 2 lanes • An 8 foot path with a 2 foot median (on east side of road) • An 6" cement curb and storm sewer RESIDENTS’ Q i A • A 35 mph speed limit (a reduction of 5 mph from the current speed limit) • No on-street parking Q: Who pays for the Road? Q: Will the path be plowed in winter? Q: How far south will the path go? A: State Aid Road funding will pay for most of the cost. A: The City of Plymouth has an existing program to plough certain paths/lrails in winter. We plan to ask the Plymouth City Council to add this bike/walking path to that program. A: To the bridge over Highway 12. Currently, the City of Wayzata has no plans to e.xtend the path south of the bridge, but may take it under consideration. NEXT STEPS We will forward this information to the cities engineers and council members for Plymouth, Orono and Wayzata. We will continue to work with the cities on this issue. NEXT PUBLIC MEETING The ne.vt (2nd of 3) public information meeting has not yet been scheduled. The cities are waiting for the Preliminary Engineering Report which should be received by the end of this month. Please watch your ma*' * ox for details. You will receive written notification of the ne,xt meeting. PLEASE ATTEND THE NEXT MEETING IT IS VERY IMPORTANT. Your physical presence conveys the importance of this issue to the cities, more than these survey results. A final road concept will be decided at the second meeting. FERNDALE: ROAD RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION Plymouth: Martin Gardner (473-2254) Stewart Dietz (475-2487) Orono: Mary King (476-8589) Terry Knight (473-5845) Barb Powell (476-1833) Wayzata: Donna Hanson (476-1518) FERNDAEE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Ferndalc Area Association The ‘Temdale Road Association ” is a committee of residents from Plymouth, Wayzata and Orono who live adjacent to Femdale Road. This group formed in 1996 to inform Femdale residents of issues relating to the then proposed interchange for Femdale Road and Highway 12. The group successfully represented the residents overwhelming opposition to the proposed interchange. This committee is prepared to represent the resident interests for the Femdale Road Improvement Project. Cities ’ Proposal The public information meeting on August 21 was attended by approximately 60 residents, city council members and city employees. Representatives were there from Plymouth, Wayzata and Orono. This was the first of three planned meetings. The planning and final approval for this project should be completed before Christmas, with construction starting in the spring of 1998. The purpose of the August 21 meeting w-as to inform residents of the cities* initial design proposal and to identify residents ’ concerns. Their proposal includes: • An 36 foot wide asphalt road, divided into two lanes. This is the width of three lanes to allow for continuous traffic flow as vehicles turn oa'off the road. • An 8 foot walking/bike path (on the Plymouth side) with a 4 to 10 foot grass median between the road and path. • A 6 ” cement curb and a storm sewer. • Removing 5 foot from the top of‘'the hill ”. • A 35 mph speed limit (a reduction of 5 mph). • No on-street parking. • SUMMARY: An overall width approximately 48-54 foot, though a greater area will need to be cleared so that there is some clear space on either side of the road. The existing road w'idth (i.e. asphalt) is 24 foot. To visualize this proposal, the road width (curb to curb) would be the same as Dunkirk Lane. This is off County Road 6, east of Hwy 101. This proposal would likely remove many of the shrubs/trees adjacent to Femdale Road. Issues and Alternative Proposals Issues to be considered in any proposal include: Rural nature of Femdale Road. Extent of loss of residents yards. Increased traffic flow. Safety (e.g. speed of traffic). # Recreational use of road (e.g. bike/walking path). Storm Sewer (e.g. water drainage £uid where the water will go). Location of power lines. Assessments to Plymouth homeowmers having direct driveway access to Femdale. After analyzing these issues, the Femdale Area Association would like to present two alternatives to residents for consideration. These are: ALTERNATIVE I: An 24 foot wide road (existing width), divided into two lanes. An 10 foot walking/tike path (on the Plymouth side) with no median between the road and path. .Alternative; 8 foot path with 2 foot median. • .An 6 ” cement curb and a storm sewer. .A 30 mph speed limit (a reduction of 10 mph). No on-street parking. r N ‘) 5 ?■ LTERNATIVE 2: An 24 foot wide road (existing width), divided into two lanes. A 30 mph speed limit (a reduction of 10 mph). A 6” cement curb and a storm sewer. No walking/bike path. • No on-street parking. •Ve are concerned that a road wider than the existing road will lead to more speeding and increase the volume of raffle using the road. This may reduce safety (for vehicles and pedestrians) and possibly increase the accident rate. Keeping the road at the existing width and reducing the "*d limit should ensure this road continues to stay safe for the foreseeable future. After analyzing the impact of various road design alternatives, we concluded that maintaining the existing rural nature of the road, could only occur by maintaining the existing road width (e.g. Alternative 2 above). We believe that Alternative 1 represents a compromise between increasing the recreational use of the road for residents while maintaining some of the rural nature of the road. Next Steps ',. Make your opinion count! As residents, your opinion is important to the cities. Please complete the “Ferndale Residents Response Form ” (see below) by Friday October 10. The majority opinion will be presented to the cities before the next public meeting. Ferndale Road Area Association Plymouth: Martin Gardner (473-2254) Terry Knight (473-5845) Stewart Dietz (475-2487) Barb Powell (476-1833) Orono; Mary King (476-8589) Wayzata: Donna Hanson (476-1518) 142 Chevy Chase Dr. 1 ^ Ridgeview Dr.______ pERND^C RESIDENTS RESPONSE FORM Your Name: Street Address:City: Cities Proposal: Alternative 1: Alternative 2: Comments: 36’ Road + Bike/Walking path (see above for details) 24 ’ Road + BikeAValking path (see above for details) 24 ’ Road (see above for details) PLEASE MAIL TO: STEWART DIETZ, 615 ALVARADO LANE, PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 Note: If you know an e.xpert on storm drains / water drainage, please provide details. GEORGE H. DIXON January 2, 1998 m 5 19^ City cf Orono Attention: Gregory A. Gappa Director of Public Services Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Dear Mr. Gappa; This is about the planned reconstruction of North Ferndale Road from T.H.12 Bridge to County Hwy. 6. I am unable to attend the public hearing on January 12. As nearly as I can tell the prime concern of residents in the project area (including my wife and niyselO is speed control of local auto traffic, both now and when the project is completed. So for what it is worth - 1. Police surveillance of any street or highway is sporadic and therefore not consistently effective. Nor are speed limit sign postings. 2. To achieve consistently effective speed control (say to 35mph) more is needed. Dips, bumps, curves and other devices can be effective and should be considered. Some should be tried, even if expenmentelly. 3. A standard objection to these devices is that some create obstacles to snowplows, street cleaners etc. Yet it's my understanding that in Europe, which certainly has snow and plows and street cleaners they have been used for years. So it would seem we can do it too. 4. I have a home in another community where an important street has a number of speed bumps. Each is about 6 feet across (front to back) and about 4 inches high at the center. Do they slow traffic? Yes Could a plow or street cleaner get across them comfortably? . Yes. 121 W^hlngton Avenu* South, No. 617 MinneapoSs, Minnesota 55401 612/339*2720 r Page two City Of Orono January 2, 1998 5. In addition to speed bumps, each of which could be well marked with warning signs and diagonal yellow lines, it seems to me it could be helpful to place caution signs on North Ferndale Road on either side of the Luce Line path crossing and mark the crossing with large diagonal ycllov/ lints. The foregoing if implemented would almost surely help control speed. Whether however you take public suggestions seriously with an intent to actually do something about them when possible is a matter about which I'm skeptical. Bureaucrats are rarely entrepreneurs. But I have been wrong about many things so I pray tliis is one of them With best wishes. LOUIS B. OBERHAUSER- JACK NEVEAUX- *A FroftSiionti AtsodsUon OBERHAUSER & NEVEAUX A partnership cf professional corporations AnOR.VfVS AND COVSSCIORS AT LAW 142) EAST VVAYZATA BOULEVARD - SUITE 210 WAYZATA, MN 55391 (612) 473-2521 FAX (612) 473-7863 BACKUP FAX (612) 473-0265 January 6, 1998 oTv o" OPOV^ MUEDiiiv.’ ; CITY OF ORONO Public Works Department 2700 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Re: PUBLIC HEARING - FERNDALE NORTH IMPROVEMENT JAN. 6 1998 rro Dear Sir or Madam: I am not positive that I can attend the public hearing with reference to the improvement to Ferndale North. I reside at 121 Chevy Chase Drive. As part of the improvement project to Ferndale North, I would like to point out a very serious safety consideration with reference to the intersection of Chevy Chase Drive and Ferndale North. The grade on Chevy Chase Drive at the intersection with Ferndale North creates a safety problem with reference to cars trying to stop in the wintertime before entering onto Ferndale North because if the street is at all slippery, it is almost impossible to break to a stop before entering onto Ferndale North. Also, it is difficult, at times, to be able to make the turn off of Ferndale North onto Chevy Chase Drive with a sufficient amount of speed to navigate the hill. If, during the reconstruction of Ferndale North, if the grade of Ferndale North at this location could be raised by three to four feet, it should go along way toward alleviating this situation. Another possibility would be to bring the entrance of Chevy Chase Drive into Ferndale North at an angle to provide some margin of safety and also to reduce the percentage grade on Chevy Chase Drive by lengthening access. • 0M_)9/9S FRI 14: IS FAX fl 612 376 42l»(» L BFKKLEY RISK @mi| Orono City Council: Fax: 473-0510 Since I will be out of town on January 12,1 am faxing to you my strong objection to the proposal that would widen Fcmdale Road to 36 feet. The preference is clearly for a 24-foot wide road with a bike path. I sincerely hope that the council acts in responsible manner to its citizens’ and taxpayers ’ input. Thank you, a IX-VVOLAAw'U--V Kenneth R. Hopkins 75 Femdale Green 473-2546 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 8,1997 %^Cj ROLL % ^ % The Council met on the above mentioned date with the following members prescn!:0/- Mayor Gabriel Jabbour, Council Members J. Diann Goetten. Charles Kelley, Barbara .1, Peterson, and Richard Flint. Representing Staff were City Administrator Ron Moorse, ^ City Attorney Tom Barrett, Senior Planning Coordinator Michael Gaffron, Planner/Zoning Administrator Elizabeth Van Zomeren, Public Ser\ ices Director Greg Gappa, City Engineer Tom Kellogg, Planning Intern Brad Bressler, and Recorder Sherry Frost. Mayor Jabbour called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. (#1) LEVY ADOPTION HEARING -1998 TAX LEVY AND BUDGET - RESOLUTIONS NO. 4009,4010 AND 4011 Moorse reported that the adoption of the levy and budget resolutions is the final action required for the 1998 Budget and Tax Levy. The ta,\ levy is proposed to increase 2.94%. Moorse said the budget reflects the City's efforts to maintain current service levels and meet long term infrastructure needs. Jabbour said the resolutions are the result of several meetings held regarding the budget. Kelley moved. Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4009 adopting the final 1997 Tax Levy Collectible in l998 in the amount of $2,225,130. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4010 adopting the 1998 General Fund Budget in the amount of $3,638,095. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Jabbour moved, Peterson seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4011 adopting the 1998 Special Revenue Funds Budgets in the amounts of $90,000 for Parks, $126,400 for Improvement and Equipment Outlay, and $623,675 for Building Cap Outlay. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (Flint arrived at this time.) i*U2) CONSENT AGENDA Items #8, 11, 13, 14, 19, 22, 25, and 28 were added to the Consent Agenda Item #4 was removed from the Consent Agenda. Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8, 1997 APPROVAL OF MINUTES (*#3) REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 24,1997 Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of November 24, 1997. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#4) TRUTH IN TAXATION MEETING OF DECEMBER 3,1997 Moorse indicated that the minutes have been revised to include information regaiding the budget. Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Truth in Ta.xation Meeting of December 3,1997 as amended. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS Appreciation was extended to White on his work on the Park Commission and his willingness to serve another term. White reported on the issues before the Park Commission including long and short term goal setting, long term funding, and park improvements. White said a report is forthcoming on the Park Commission's mission statement, funding sources, parks, and rinks. He indicated they are making progress in these endeavors. Jabbour informed White that he has met with Hennepin Parks, and the meeting was ver>' productive. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS No member of the Planning Commission was in attendance. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (#5) U2264 JANET KIERNAN, 1491 SHORELINE DRIVE - VARIANCE - REQUEST FOR DIRECTION The applicant was present, along with architect, Alan Christy, contractor, Joe Dzurik, and footings sub-contractor, Mr. Nelson. ! : r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 (U5 - U2264 Janet Kieman - Continued) Gaffron reported that the applicant was granted variances in August, 1997, for remodeling of her residence w ith the findings that 40% of the existing house would remain, resulting in 20% of final product being the existing house. Since that time, it has been determined that only a few pieces of original foundation remain and none of the superstructure. Work was stopped by Staff for Council direction regarding whether reconsideration should occur of application since lakeshore and side setback variances are typically not allowed for new construction. Gaffron said there is the opportunity at this time to have the property become more conforming as it appears to be a total reconstruction. Gaffron review'ed the plan noting the location of the three remaining pieces of foundation. Photographs were distributed showing the current property condition. He noted that the problem created is that too little remains of the foundation to consider the project a remodel. Gaffron asked Council for direction whether the applicant should be allowed to continue under the building permit and variances granted, or whether the house should be moved to meet side and lakeshore setbacks, or reviewed again by Planning Commission. Gaffron said the Council's first step should be to formally conclude whether the project is new construction or a remodel. Jabbour asked if Staff feels the project has gone beyond the 40% threshold as noted in the conditions of the resolution. Gaffron said he believes it has gone beyond that threshold. Christy said he understood that alt are familiar with the history of the property. He noted the applicant has tried to stay within the parameters ot the resolution and building permit dated 11/20/97. He said the building inspector was contacted throughout all steps. There was no attempt to do anything that was not intended. Christy said the building inspector requested the additional building demolition without considering whether this was right or wrong under the conditions of the resolution. He said the last direction given by the insrectoi was removal of the frost footings which were deemed inadequate. Christy said conditions were found that were not originally anticipated, but the plans are the same as far as location and structure and all facts presented. He said the only variation is to site conditions and directions of the building inspector resulting in less of original building remaining. Based on that Christy would like to see the project continue. k MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 (#5 - #2264 Janet Kieman - Continued) Jabbour said the Council is familiar with the site and that the applicant has diligently worked with the City. He noted, when Council had previously discussed the application, that Council Member Kelley had felt the footings should be inspected and certified prior to consideration of the variance application to determine their condition. Jabbour had thought it would be a burden to the applicant to have to determine the soundness of the foundation. Based on that information, the resolution approving the variances was adopted. Jabbour said that technically, the construction is now starting from scratch as a vacant parcel and could not be allowed lower standards than required of new construction. Christy said he understood that what is remaining is as it is but it is due primarily because of directives from the building inspector. He said it seems that this furthers the hardship for the applicant as all of the plans to save portions of the existing building proved futile. Jabbour said the building inspector is responsible to adhere to universal building codes and the two are not mutually exclusive. Christy asked what alternatives could be explored. Kelley said he agreed with Jabbour that with the finding of bad soils or bad foundation, the applicant should be required to adhere to zoning code ordinance. Kieman said the occurrences happened over 5-6 steps where the building inspector came out to the site and contractor was told of the situation and had asked what should be done. She questioned why it was allowed to get to this point where the framing and footings are in and not determined in earlier steps. Gaffron recharacterized what he thought took place. He said he understood the building contractor asked the inspector to come out and look at questionable areas and was told they should be removed. This occurred without zoning stafl involvement. Gaffron said he visited the site last month where he felt the structural removals were at the point where he was barely comfortable that it confomied with the conditions of the resolution, but the project got to the point of needing additional removals putting it out of zoning conformity. Jabbour asked if the building inspector was aware of the 40% structure remaining criteria. Gaffron said he was. He said it was a question of wearing a zoning hat versus a building inspector hat. He said he told the building official last Thursday, 12/4/97, that the work had to be stopped as it was past the point of meeting the findings and conditions of the resolution. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 (#5 - #2264 Janet Kieman - Continued) Kelley asked if the contractor knew of the situation. The contractor said he did. Dzurik said when he spoke with the building inspector about the framing, noting he had to raise the foundation two courses and suspend the structure in mid-air, he saw that only 5% of existing foundation could be incorporated into the blueprint, the role of common sense look over. Kelley asked if the applicant was informed when the project got to the point where over 40% of the structure was removed. Dzurik said he assumed the building officials knew of the 40% requirement and should have informed him that no more could be removed. Jabbour felt the project went one step beyond where it should have with the framing. He said when the applicant made application, she was told the variances w'ould be given but should hire a structural engineer to certify soundness of the foundation. Jabbour said he had thought this would result in undue hardship so the applicant was granted variances provided 40% of the existing structure could be saved. Jabbour said the applicant chose to go forward and found out that 40% of the structure could not be saved. Dzurik said he was told to remove more of the structure by the building inspector. He said the structure could have been underpinned. Dzurik said he asked the building inspector if the removals would cause the project to be stopped and was told absolutely not and told him to take additional structure down. Dzurik felt this did not make sense. Flint said he agrees with Jabbour and Kelley that the project was new construction. Peterson agreed. Kieman said she feels caught in the middle. She said she informed Dzurik not to do anything without talking to the City. She noted the project has cost alot and this will bear additional cost burdens. Jabbour noted the possibility of having to go through the entire process again. He noted that the applicant did not have a house that could be added onto. He cited another example of a similar situation. Kiem?r. f?U there were ways to have worked with the materials, such as underpinning, a id it was the inspector's opinion to remove furtlier structure. She noted there was a structural engineer on the job. Jabbour said the building inspector could come to the next meeting to answer questions but feels the project has gone beyond the parameters of the resolution. r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 (#5 - #2264 Janet Kieman - Continued) Gaffron said there is no question that the building inspector approved all of the steps taken and approved them because from a building code standpoint, the substandard portions could not be part of the new house. He said the project possibly could have been stopped earlier. Dzurik asked if it has any bearing that he had asked the inspector whether the removals would cause any problems and was told it would not. City Attorney Barrett said he is comfortable with telling the Council that they can enforce the conditions of the resolution as far as the building code has to be protected. As a question of law, the City has the right to enforce the findings. Jabbour asked Council for direction. Goetten noted the unfortunate situation. She said she is generally steadfast in such situations. Goetten said the applicant was put on notice when she applied for the variance that she had to comply with conditions of the resolution. She understood the applicant has been above board with the City but does not believe there is a win-win situation. Goetten felt the application should be reviewed again by the Planning Commission and the structure pulled back behind the 75' setback line. Jabbour asked Gaffron to show the site plan and the 75' setback line and house location. Kelley clarified that there were two variances required plus hardcover. Gaffron said the project is o\ er the 25% hardcover allow ed. Parts of the structure, terrace, and steps are located in the 0-75' setback. There is also need for an average lakeshore setback variance but that is not an issue. Jabbour asked if the structure could be moved to the north. Gaffron noted the location of trees to the north. Tom Kellogg said the sewer line comes in from the driveway, showing the location in the northwest comer, so this would not impact any construction. Dzurik informed Kieman that her sewer line was in place. Gaffron asked if any constmetion under the current approval would be allowed in the 0- 75' setback. Goetten asked how- far into the 0-75' setback any construction occurs. Gaffron said it was 6-8'. Jabbour asked if Council would support the plan if the structure was pulled out of the 0-75' zone. Kelley suggested he would support the structure if pulled back behind the 75 ‘ setback and to the north to meet the side setback requirement. Goetten said she was concerned more with the 0-75' setback. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 (#5 - #2264 Janet Kieman - Continued) Jabbour noted that it is not the Council's intent to design the home but were trying to determine the issues of concern. He said the majority of the Council feels the resolution could be amended if the structure was relocated out of the 75' setback or the portion eliminated in the 0-75' setback. Kieman asked if this included the terrace and stairs. Jabbour said the terrace would have to be located out of the 0-75', but the stairs could remain. He noted the house was only allowed to remain where it was located due to the use of the existing foundation. Peterson asked if the 6-8' distance into the 0-75' setback included the terrace. Gaffron said it did not. He said the plan would have to be moved back 20' to allow the terrace to be located out of the 0-75' setback. Kieman noted that she had significantly reduced the hardcover in the 0-75' setback. Jabbour agreed but noted that the requirement is for zero hardcover in the 0-75' setback with none of the original house remaining. Jabbour asked the applicant if she would like to take time to consider her options at this time. He clarified that the resolution could be amended with the house as designed as long as no portion of the house or terrace is located in the 0-75' setback. Kieman noted the problem with getting closer to the garage with the elevations. Gaffron showed the site plan and the difficulty in making use of the existing garage as planned if the stmeture is pushed back on the property, with having to swing into the garage if it is moved to the west. Jabbour suggested it li e stmeture is moved to the north, there would be more space in front of the old garage, ’vieman questioned whether this would affect the drainficld. Gaffron said it would not create a problem as sewer will be ready to serve the property. He said grading may be of question. Kieman asked Council to consider the busyness of CoRd 15 and her desire to keep as far away from that road as possible. Jabbour moved, Kelley seconded, to continue the agenda item to the end of the Zoning Administrator's Report. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#6) #2279 G. MARC AND TRACY WHITEHEAD, 1220 LYMAN AVENUE - PRELIMINARY PLAT - RESOLUTION NO. 3966 Tracy Whitehead and Attorney, John Winston, were present. Jabbour ascertained from City Attorney Barrett that the applicant and he have reached a conclusion regarding the park dedication fee. Gaffron acknowledged that the preliminaiy' plat was being reconsidered because of the park dedication fee. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 (#6 - #2279 WOiitehead - Continued) ^ Gaflron said the Council voted to reconsider the preliminary plat at their November 24 meeting and direct Staff to draft language showing the nexus and proportionality of the park fee in its relationship to this subdivision. Gaffron said he had been unaware until this evening that a park fee agreement had been reached. Jabbour asked that the record reflect that the Council and Staff have been developing information to show the nexus so that the park fee could be determined by the City Attorney and Staff. Moorse reported that he contacted Council members regarding whether they would support approving a park fee of $7,000. He received majority support for this fee and authorized Barrett to resolve the issue at that amount. Tracy Whitehead indicated her acceptance of the fee amount. Barrett asked that the preliminary plat resolution be amended with respect to the park fee by adding three additional sentences as follows: “After the approval of the preliminary plat by the City Council, applicants, by their attorney, sent a letter objecting to the requirement that the applicants pay the park dedication fee as required by ordinance. Upon receiving the applicant’s objection, the Council moved to reopen the preliminary plat, and to instruct the staff to provide more detailed findings for the Council’s consideration with respect to the park deication fee. After consultation with their attorney, and negotiations with the City Staff and City Attorney, applicants determined that they would agree to settle this matter in the amount of $3,500 per lot.” Whitehead voiced her approval of that addition. Goetten asked if the subdivision and park fee remained the same. Jabbour said it did. Jabbour noted that Goetten was in favor of the application itself but not in how the park fee issue was handled and would stand on that opinion as she does not want to see case by case review. Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the preliminary plat Resolution No. 3966 with the addition of the three sentences by City Attorney Barrett. Jabbour asked that the record reflect that Barrett read the sentences into the record and were approved by both the applicant and attorney. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 1, Goetten. 8 r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 (#7) #2279 G. MARC AND TRACY WHITEHEAD, 1220 LYMAN AVENUE FINAL PLAT - RESOLUTION NO. 4012 Gaffron reported that the applicant has substantially completed the conditions required in the final plat and Staff is in receipt of the mylars and documents listed as required for the final approval. The park dedication fee issue has also been resolved. Staff recommends approval of the resolution of the final plat. The applicant had no additional comments. Jabboiir moved, Kelley seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4012. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 1, Goetten. (*#8) #2306 DENNIS PLATTETER, 809 BROWN RO.\D NORTH - FINAL PLAT CLASS III SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION NO. 4013 Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4013. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#9) #2308 BROOK PARK REALTY, 3760 SHORELINE DRIVE - PRD AND CLASS III PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION Bill Gleason of Brook Park Realty was present. Van Zomeren referenced the plans for the Class III Subdivision and PRD. The property is located on CoRd 15. Van Zomeren reviewed the discussions held on the application at two Planning Commission meetings. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the preliminar>' plat. Van Zomeren indicated that before final plat approval, the issue of a water loop or sprinkler system needs to be decided. Van Zomeren reviewed the concerns and resolution draft. Van Zomeren said the property is heavily wooded. The applicant has attempted to maximize tree preservation. Access will be from Livingston Avenue with a private driveway to access the townhomes to the south. A hammerhead will be added for a turnaround for cars and emergency vehicles. She noted that the individual townhomes w ill be privately owned and the other areas will be left in common ownership. Van Zomeren reviewed the conditions of the resolution. Under #16, Van Zomeren said the landscape plan will be done prior to final plat approval and w ill need to be changed if Council agrees. Jabbour asked if there w as any hazardous materials found on the property. Van Zomeren said she is not sure what is there noting the property is a 10 acre site. ’ i . 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 (#9 - #2308 Brook Park Realty - Continued) Van Zomeren noted the typical submittals being required. The park dedication fee is $19,464. Sewer and water fees were noted. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat and PRD. The applicant. Bill Gleason, had no comments at this time. Flint questioned the 7' easement of right-of-way dedication to Shoreline Drive. He noted the Hennepin County bike trail plan and questioned whether this easement is the place for a bike trail. It is currently noted for use by utilities only. He questioned whether there is room for a bike trail on the southern edge of the property. Van Zomeren said it can be reviewed by the City Engineer and resolution can be amended for a trail if requested. She indicated the Hennepin County right-of-way agent is requesting the same amount of easement as utilities companies have. Jabbour asked if the City wants a 7' or 10 ’ trail. He noted the park dedication fee would have to be adjusted if that was the case. He asked if Gleason understood. Gleason said he was working through it. Flint noted the trail would have to be 10 ’ or 12' questioning whether the location was feasible for a trail without getting into wetlands. Gleason said he did not believe there was adequate room for a trail in that location. Flint questioned the determination of 30 units in the zoning district. Van Zomeren said the property is in the LR-lCl District and the applicant is able to increase the density by 50% if items A-F are met on pages 1 and 2 of the resolution. Barrett suggested the resolution be amended to note the addition of the proposed plat meeting those requirements. Kelley asked if the application meets those requirements, if the City has to allow the 50% increase in density. Barrett said he would review the matter but believed it is mandatory. Kelley felt too much structure was being squeezed in but would comply if required. Kelley asked how many tovMihomes were located to the east of this subdivision. Van Zomeren did not have that number. Kelley said he would like to know as the subdivision would add traffic through a lower density neighborhood. He suspected the property to the east has more dr>' buildable and has only 24-26 duplex units. Jabbour noted that a credit is received for the wetland. Kelley said he understood that, noting that was the reason for asking Barrett the question on allowing an increased density. Jabbour noted that sewered areas are reviewed differently from non-sewered areas. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 (#9 - #2308 Brook Park Realty - Continued) Kelley questioned the use of a hammerhead noting he has never seen this done in the City. He asked if the City was taking the position that this is to be allowed. Jabbour said he feels the use of a hammerhead instead of a cul-de-sac is in conflict with the ordinance. Barrett reported that the language provided within the LR-ICI, one family lakeshore, Zoning District allows for a 50% density increase. The language says this "may" be provided which appears to provide some discretion to the Council, but since there are no standards by which this is to be judged, he feels the applicant would have the right to the density increase. Flint questioned whether there is the discretion to round up in calculating the number of units allowed. Kelley asked if the number can be rounded down. Barrett said, by policy, what has been done in the past should be applied in order to be consistent. Jabbour noted that they were talking about one unit only. He sees the main issues as that of a hammerhead versus a cul-de-sac, and the guideline of certain agencies to say whether a sprinkler system is required. Van Zomeren reported that the resolution was not drafted to require the sprinkler system. Gleason said if the water main could not be looped, the alternative would be to install a sprinkler system, but he has not done an analysis of it as yet. Gleason said he is attempting to save trees. Gleason said the system can be looped but tree loss is a consideration. It was noted that water pressure could be affected if all townhome residents were drawing water at the same time. Jabbour asked Gappa about the water pressure. Gappa said he did not believe water pressure was a problem as there was capacity to pull from two different directions. Gappa thought it would be nice to have a loop. Jabbour asked if it was nice or if it was required. Gappa indicated it was not required. Jabbour noted the code does not say the plan must be approved by a landscape architect. Gleason said he was going to submit a landscape plan. If it is found there would be a loss of more trees, a plan could be provided to show the addition of more trees. Jabbour agreed noting the applicant should not be forced to have a landscape architect produce a plan. Gleason informed Kelley that tuck-under garages will be provided for the residents. Kelley asked where the front door is for the dwellings located in the middle. Gleason referred to page 5 of the plans noting the doors are on the walkways facing toward the woods. Kelley clarified that the door is not on the same side of the building as the garage. Kelley asked where guests park. Gleason said they could park in the driveway but would have to walk all the way around to access the door. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 (#9 - #2308 Brook Park Realty - Continued) Jabbour asked if the project meets the Livable Community Act. Gleason said he was unsure what that limit is but noted he was required to eliminate some units. The current market price is $134,000. Moorse reported that under the act, the maximum limit is $120,000 for 1997. Flint voiced interest in knowing how traffic will be affected in the neighborhood and if there were any requirements pertaining to this issue. Van Zomcrcn said there was not but could be added as a condition. Flint questioned whether it is fair to add that much traffic to a lower density housing area. Gleason said a water tower is located in the area where the road comes out. The number of units is low on that road and traffic would not affect many units. He said the goal is to extend the road to the west if he can acquire the land. The owner is not interested at this time, however. Kelley said a point that the Council should be made aware of is the subdivision may facilitate the need for a traffic light to be installed at Casco Point Road and Shoreline Drive. He noted the difficulty that would result in making left turns to go east during the morning rush hour. Kelley said the CoRd 19 and Livingston intersection will be used more and is a bad intersection to begin with. Moorse said the Council may want to ask the applicant to provide traffic information since this is the only way out of the subdivision and is of major concern. Jabbour said the majority of the application meets the code, though, he would like to have seen the project meeting the affordable housing criteria. He indicated the cul-de- sac requirement would not be met but noted the plan is for saving trees. Jabbour said the applicant must demonstrate the hardship to deviate from the cul-de-sac requirement. Gleason said the drive is meant to be a private drive, will be marked and made to appear as such. The hammerhead was considered to provide room for a turnaround. Jabbour noted that most of the roads in the City are private roads. Jabbour said he sees no hardship demonstrated. Gleason asked if trees were considered a hardship. Jabbour said the problem could be satisfied by eliminating two homes and installing a cul-de-sac noting the requirement is law. Kelley said he had questioned whether the Council was considering not requiring the applicant to adhere to the law. Peterson said she also was concerned with the issue of the cul-de-sac. She asked Barrett to look into the use of the word, "mav". Barrett said he would do so. He feels there is reason for plausible discretion by the applicant with the language, "may obtain". Jabbour asked for Council direction. I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 (#9 - #2308 Brook Park Realty - Continued) Goetlen asked Barrett if it was fairly conclusive that approval should be granted as meeting conditions. Barrett said that was true as far as density is concerned. Gleason noted that the goal was for affordability and cost would increase if two buildings were eliminated and a cul-de-sac added. He felt the private driveway aids affordability. He noted the encumbrance of trees as well noting he was trying to meet a lot of criteria with the plan. mceJabbour said the code is specific in its regard to cul-de-sacs. He noted the market pri< is already over the limit of affordable housing. Jabbour indicated no hardship was shown. Jabbour said either the code should be adhered to or the code changed. Jabbour concluded that because of the density allowed by code and with the cul-de-sac, it would result in a loss of trees. Kelley noted the cul-de-sac would be located at the end of the private driveway. If unit #7 was eliminated, there w'ould be room for a cul-de-sac. Gleason said he understood that but was tr> ing to accommodate several trees but would support the cul-de-sac. Flint asked how the traffic flow w'orked. The road and paved walkways were noted. Gleason said if the units were staggered, a ser\dce door could be provided. He said he normall}r builds courtyards into the project. Gleason said two separated walkways are being provided where one w'ould normally be shown. This is being done in order to save trees. Kelley was informed that there would be a homeowners association. He asked about outdoor storage. Gleason said no outdoor storage would be allowed. No boats could be placed in the drivew'ay and cars would be allowed in the driveways only temporarily. Van Zomeren referenced the restrictive covenant document noted under #7 on page 6 of the resolution. Kelley questioned whether the Council should review that document. Gleason said the homeowners association document would be submitted with the final plat. Kelley said he would not want to wait until that point and have the Council deny it. Jabbour said it would be more appropriate to give direction now on what is e.xpected. Jabbour informed Goetten that the Council can make conditions on a homeowners association. Gleason said he would submit the document to staff. It was questioned how that would assist enforcement since the document can be modified. Jabbour said modifications would have to be part of the resolution. Gleason said a modification would also require 100% approval, one denial would totally deny it, and would require Council approval. While there is a time limit to the document, it is for 30 years. Jabbour noted the document can be renewed for an additional six years. Jabbour noted that there was a very limited street side to the units. I le would like to ensure that there is adequate parking. r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 (#9 - #2308 Brook Park Realty - Continued) Kelley asked if this was a PRD. Barrett said the increase is pursuant to the zoning district and not a PRD. Kelley asked if there was no parking on the street. Gleason said no parking would be allowed on the 22' wide street. Kelley asked what occurs when there is a party. Gleason said residents can ask their neighbors for permission to park in their driveways. Flint said he was not prepared to vote on the preliminar>' plat at this time as he would like an answer on traffic flow. He is less concerned with the issue of the cul-de-sac. Flint thought the use of a hammerhead made sense. Flint would like to see the impact of the density and is bothered by the use of the word "may". Van Zomeren said it is listed under additional permitted uses. Barrett suggested the Council under Subdivision III ask the applicant to be required to meet these provisions, A through F in the resolution but others as well that give Council discretion. Under E, for building size and location, and F, vehicle egress and ingress. Council approval could be required. This may need further discussion. Jabbour said he was not concerned with the cul-de-sac itself but with randomly ignoring the need for demonstrating hardship. He noted the Planning Commission unanimously rejected the need for the cul-de-sac and should not continue to make decisions in this manner. He said if the Council wants to make changes on egress and ingress it should do so or the application should be moved forward. The application would be discussed at the January* 12 Council Meeting and January 19 Planning Commission Meeting. Jabbour said once the preliminary plat is passed, the City is committing to the project but some members of the Council are not comfortable with the plan as currently proposed. Gleason said he can ascertain the traffic impacts. He noted the subdivision is not designed for families but for singles and couples. He is unsure what can be done as far as CoRd 15 is concerned. Flint said he would like the applicant to present the information and have staff review it. He feels staff needs to be more proactive and took at development of the property to the west. Kelley said he would not like to see only one way out of the subdivision, Jabbour asked that guidelines be given to the applicant. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 (#9 - #2308 Brook Park Realty - Continued) Kelley asked the applicant to determine how this subdivision would correspond to the neighborhood to the east as far as density; what is proposed to the west, and roadway to CoRd 15. He suggested the use of a cul-de-sac. He wants to see the 22' private road meet the standards for private roads and review the homeowners agreement. Gappa noted the standard width for private roads is 28'. Van Zomeren said the reduction in width is to save trees. Kelley said if the issue is trees or safety, safety is more important as additional trees can be planted. As far as traffic impact, Kelley suggested that Livingston and Lyric could possibly be one way streets. Goetten said she had considered that as well noting residents will find other alternatives when they see a problem using CoRd 15. Goetten moved, Flint seconded, to table Application #2308 to the January 12 Council Meeting. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#10) #2314 JOHN BESSESEN, HOYT DEVELOPMENT, 2505-2507 KELLY AVENUE - ZONING AMENDMENT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND VARIANCE - RESOLUTIONS NO. 4014 Van Zomeren explained how the existing duplex credit works. She noted it is a moving target as it is tied to the commercial and industrial zones. The properties within 200' of the industrial zone are not eligible as they are not adjacent but separated by roadways and the railroad. In the commercial zoning district along Highway 12 areas within 200' and adjacent were shown. Van Zomeren said in practice, the duplex credit would not be used in this area. She showed the Navarre area where eligibility for duplex credit could occur noting its haphazard application based on "adjacent". Van Zomeren indic^ .- d that the purpose of locating higher density residential next to commercial uses is lo buffer low density housing. It is her opinion that the duplex credit is not an appropriate technique or method to attain buffering. The proposed property could become eligible by using the B3 District and establishing additional eligibility within 250'. This would add the property in question only. Van Zomeren reviewed the application. She reported there is an existing structure on the property that is a legal non-conforming use. In the LR-IB Zoning District one acre per dwelling unit is the minimum. A PRD is not allowed as the property does not meet the density requirement. The applicant is proposing removal of the existing structure and building a twinhome on the property. There is an Outlot A along the lakeshore and created and recommended by the City to provide docks for the nearby vownhomes. The one acre property with the outlot grants rights to the neighbors next door. 15 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 (U\0 - #2314 Hoyt Development - Continued) Van Zomeren reviewed the options as laid out in the packet. She reported that the Planning Commission recommended approval on a 3/2 vote to amend the zoning code by changing the eligible area within the B3 Zoning District. One alternative was to table the application to allow the Council to review where townhomes should be allowed and amend the Comprehensive Plan. A variance would be required to locate the duplex further away than the duplex credit currently allows. Bradley Hoyt and John Bessesen were present. Kelley indicated another option would be to combine the property with the adjacent townhomes into a PRD, eliminating individual lots, and working together to have a common dock. Van Zomeren said the problem would be that the property would not meet the requirements of the PRD. She indicated the wetlands also need to be delineated. Hoyt said he only has an option on the ownership of the subject property. His goal is to remove an unsightly structure and improve the property. Hoyt felt the Planning Commission recommendation is commendable as it only affects this property. He noted that Outlot A inhibits the lot from being a single family development. Hoyt said he is contractually closing on the property at the end of the week. He noted the history behind the common dock. He said he was willing to work with the neighbors to find a solution. Jabbour indicated that everyone is motivated to improve this property, but he wants to ensure that the right decision is made and not one of spot zoning. Jabbour said he asked Staff to review why the dock was planned as it is and whether the reason still applies today. He noted the removal of the dock would change the values of the property. Goetten said she was not in favor of spot zoning and would like to know the reasoning behind the docks. Hoyt said his understanding was one of clustering noting a past Council member lived nearby and did not wish to view the docks. Hoyt indicated that the townhome owners next door do not own the property underneath their homes but is owned by the association. Van Zomeren said the outlot is owned in common with all homeowners having an interest in it. Bessesen noted there were two homeowner associations. Hoyt suggested the docks straddling the property line by both properties and Outlot A being eliminated. Bessesen said Outlot A requires annual licensing. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 (#10 - #2314 Hoyt Development - Continued) Jabbour said he feels there is a density issue in why the outlot was developed initially. He thought the purpose was to ensure that the homeowners association does not have riparian rights to the property in front of them and to ensure that the lagoon would not have a large number of docks on it. Hoyt noted that there w'a^ about 135 of lakeshore for the subject property and about 220' for the adjacent property. Kelley asked what prevents the applicant from combining the property with the Kelly Cove Townhouse Development and maintaining a building envelope. Jabbour said 6 acres would be required. Kelley questioned whether the northern property received variances. He noted the need to determine the dry buildable. Jabbour noted that Council Member Kelley has not wanted to see a PRD around the lake. He questioned how 1/2 acre zoning was not allowed here and done elsewhere, citing property located between two marinas. It was determined that the zoning was different. Bessesen asked if the existing structure could be added onto and then removed afterwards. Van Zomeren said the property could not be expanded due to its non- conforming status. Bessesen said the Planning Commission was not sure of the distance from the zoning for duplex credit and recalculated it. The distance determined was found to only affect this parcel and would be considered adjacent property. The distance is 200' to the property and 250' to the middle point of the property. He indicated this w ould clean up the zoning and achieve improving this property without adversely affecting any other property. Jabbour indicated that the application triggered the thought process that staff thought would benefit the zoning without doing spot zoning but achieving more for the city in correcting issues of zoning. Kelley asked about combining with the lots to the north without doing a PRD and being within 200'. Van Zomeren indicated that the duplex itself would not be within the 200'. Kelley noted that the common area w ould include property both in and out of the duplex area. Hoyt said he was not in favor of any combinations. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 (#10 - #2314 Hoyt Development - Continued) Van Zomeren clarified the original recommendation which would eliminate the duplex credit and just restrict the duplex credit to the B3 Zoning District only. She does not believe the duplex credit is the best method for buffering single family residences from commercial zoning. Kelley disagreed noting the Highway 12 Corridor has commercial property with multi-housing behind it and then single family homes. He reconfirmed the need for such buffering but noted that the subject property was not on Highway 12. Van Zomeren restated that buffering is appropriate but this method is not appropriate. She indicated what is done in the commercial district affects the duplex credit which should not occur. She feels a determination should be made where the duplex credit should be located. Jabbour said he is against spot zoning and indicated a 4/5th majority vote is required. There were no public comments. The public hearing was closed. Jabbour suggested eliminating the loop in the ordinance noting he was against eliminating the outlot. Hoyt noted that he would have preferred to build a single family home but could not do so because of the outlot. He questioned whether the outlot could be rearranged but said he needed the option to build the twinhome. Ho>t said the existing building is only 5' from the right-of-way whic •. reates pioblems. He noted that elimination of the outlot was not part of this propoi Jabbour asked about eliminating the duplex credit. Van Zomeren said the Planning Commission recommended keeping the duplex credit with a B3 add-on. This was not recommended by Staff. She indicated that action would be required on the amendment before a CUP could occur for this proposal. Kelley said he had a problem with the B3 Zoning noting the reasoning behind it was for existing use, Rick's Super Valu. Kelley said the B3 is just like commercial property with d larger building. He is concerned that another concept could end up in that building. He would not like to see the duplex credit tied to the B3. Jabbour asked if the duplex credit extends around the B3 in the rest of the zoning. Kelley asked the reason for applying it only to the B3 district, where the existing use is a grocery store. Van Zomeren said it is not the current use but the zoning classification which is the link that supports the higher density. Kelley indicated the whole area is the shopping area noting a hardware store across the street. He questioned what would occur if Hoyt Development comes in and the only B3 in the City is because it is a grocery' store and attaching this use to one place. He noted that Kelly Avenue is eligible across from where nc lives. Hoyt felt the focus is where the city wants it to occur. He thought the contemplation of a duplex was a good idea. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 (#10 - #2314 Hoyt Development - Continued) Jabbour suggested this property and other duplex between the two marinas and Sandy Beach be cleaned up. He said he did not visualize the need to go through a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Gaffron said any changes to zoning would require amendment of the Comprehensive Plan. Flint said he favored option #4 (Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zoning Study) but noted it does not solve the applicant's problem. Hoyt said he was unable to extend their option agreement. Bessesen noted that the proposal was to maintain the same elevation as the other townhomes. Jabbour suggested expanding the district to 250' and adding the B3 and then creating a special district for this property and the other areas noted. Barrett said that would be satisfactory. He questioned what was published for this application. It was noted that the zoning was not changing but amending the district, while not eliminating other districts, which results in the proper notification made. Flint said he would support that asking if the other areas would be considered. Jabbour said it would be done immediately. Gaffron said he would like to have a separate discussion on the goals of the other properties. Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the Planning Commission recommendation instructing Staff to review the three areas noted to determine what zoning could be used for those locations. Peterson asked for clarification on what is being accomplished. Jabbour said this would extend the duplex credit to 250', adding the B3 zoning, and allowing the project to move forward. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Jabbour moved, Flint seconded, to approve Application #2314 for CUP and variance per the Planning Commission recommendation. Kelley asked about the variance. Van Zomeren clarified that the duplex credit has two criteria. The first is that a lot must have public sanitary sewer and be adjacent to the commercial/industrial district. The second is that the duplex must be constructed within 200'. The amendment would not change the 200' limit for construction. The footprint is further than 250' though the property is within 250'. The variance would be for distance and not for use. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 (*#11) CITY OF ORONO - ZONING AMENDMENT - LAND ALTERATION REGULATIONS AND PERMIT CRITERIA #102,2ND SERIES Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to adopt Ordinance No. 102, Second Series, an Ordinance Amending the City of Orono Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19 and 21, and Section 10.56 Subdivision 16 (J) to Revise and Clarify Requirements and Limitations on Land Alteration and Land Alteration Permits. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#5) #2264 JANET KIERNAN - CONTINUED Jabbour asked if the Council would be within their jurisdiction to amend the resolution. Barrett said this could occur as long as there were less variances required. Christy said the applicant proposes to rotate the structure clockwise 15 degrees and move it back behind the 75' setback line in its entirety including the terrace. This would allow access to the garage without jamming the structure into it, minimize economical w'aste. eliminating further excavation, and minimize tree loss. The same variances would be required for side setback and 75-250' hardcover. Christy said the hardcover would increase in the 75-250' setback due to the amount that would have been in the 0- 75' would now be pushed into the 75-250' setback. The other variance would be the same for average lakeshore setback. Christy said he would like to see the permit amended, submit site plans, and redesign the interior. If elevation is changing to meet the grade, there may need to be a slight design change making some of the current design of the old home awkward and could be eliminated. This could be accomplished without further increasing the bulk of the structure and resulting in less of the bulk encroaching the side setback. He speculated that there would be no additional fees necessary for the new construction. Jabbour asked about time schedule. Christy said if the footings and concrete work could be done within the next two weeks, there would be no problem with continuing. Jabbour said he would like to reconsider the application with eliminating hardcover in the 0-75' setback (excluding stairs), and allow ing this amount of square footage to be in the 75-250' setback, maintaining same side setback of 15' with no further encroachment, and eliminating existing footings. Kelley noted that there is 3.9% of hardcover in the 0- 75' setback and the 75-250' setback is currently at 27.6%. Jabbour noted that the calculations will have to be by square footage. Barrett said the recommendation by Jabbour would be satisfactory ’. Gaffron indicated there would be no additional fees. The only change might be the valuation for the building permit. Jabbour asked that Staff diligently work with the applicant. 20 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 (#5 - #2264 Janet Kieman - Continued) Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to reopen Application #2264. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to amend Resolution #3946 to reflect that any previous variances given to the structure in the 0-75' setback w’ould be totally eliminated and the amount of square footage would be credited to the 75-250' setback. All remaining variances would remain as in the original resolution. The side setback is not to exceed amount stated. The applicant supported this motion. Dzurik asked if structure changes are made on the blueprint, if the applicant has to pay a fee. Gaffron said the building inspector would likely have to charge another plan review which is typically a percentage and would be for probably a couple of hours time. Jabbour asked if this fee could be waived. Barrett said it could. This was not added to the motion but with Council agreement and understanding by staff. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (Agenda order continues after review of Item #17) (#17) BURNING PERMIT REGULATIONS Gappa reported that the Council has reviewed the burning permit regulations in the past. The recent changes for consideration include changes to the length of the permit and an allowance for burning of brush depending on the lot size. The burning regulations in Independence and Minnetrista were researched, where they allow brush to be burned without permit up to a 25' pile, 1 O' high. Gappa said development in Orono was then reviewed and burning was considered for three categories: recreational, small brush, and large brush. Gappa reviewed the requirements for each type of burning as outlined in the packet. Gappa said he spoke with West Hennepin Public Safety, who requires a water supply consisting of a single hose for a small brush fire that includes log disposal. He thought their requirements were reasonable. The large brush fires would be for properties of 5+ acres. In that case, the West Hennepin Public Safety requires two hoses. Jabbour asked for public comments. Allan Engleman, 315 Old Crystal Bay Road, asked if the Council was now considering burning of brush. He was informed that this was being considered. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8, 1997 (#17 - Burning Permit Regulations - Continued) Jabbour noted there were several ways these issues could be addressed. Gappa noted that it is the City's intention to provide a site for disposal as well. Kelley asked for several additions. He would like to see an adult (property owner supervision) be required to be in attendance for any small and large brush fires and fires be extinguished before leaving the site. Kelley said no commercial or imported material burning should be allowed for small and large brush fires; materials burned should come from subject property. He also feels there should be a time limit, noting no burning should occur during the night time hours. He supported the length of the permits as noted in the information. Jabbour suggested the burning permits be for a 90 day period. Gappa said the time limitation is to maintain control. Goetten asked what occurs if a fire cannot happen due to conditions such as high wind. Gappa said the permits allow for an extension. Jabbour said a fine and inability to obtain another permit penalty needs to be attached for violations. Peterson suggested the burning permits be for a 45 day period. Engleman asked if water has to be provided if the burning occurs during the winter. Goetten said that should be left to the discretion of the fire department. Engleman felt fires should be attended. Bob Gehmian agreed with Gappa regarding the concept of chipping wood where feasible but believes there is a place for limited large brush fires. He would like to see the issue addressed about availability of water. He thought if there was substantial snowcover, no water would be necessary. Jabbour asked Gappa to review the issue of snowcover in regard to brush fires. Gappa suggested a water hose be available if necessary at the building site. Kelley said a fire extinguisher could be available too. Gappa referenced the list of conditions. He asked if burning regulations should be an ordinance or policy. Gappa noted that an ordinance revision should not require a public hearing. Flint supported a new ordinance with inclusion of comments made by Kelley regarding safety. I'lint noted that fires during the winter months may have to be done at night due to the limited daylight hours. Goetten supported the regulations. She noted the need to eliminate the first bullet noted on the top of the second page of the permit (not to bum brush or other prohibited materials), which would no longer apply. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 (#17 - Burning Permit Regulations - Continued) Kelley asked that the ordinance be submitted to Council in its final form and instructed Staff to present it at the next Council meeting. Gappa asked for Council's recommendation on time frame of the burning permit. Jabbour suggested 60 days with an annual permit for recreational fires. He asked that a penalty clause be included that docs not relate to a fine but to a time limit of 6 months. Goetten asked tliat Kelley ’s concern be added that only property owner's materials can be burned and no additional materials be brought onto the property. Peterson asked what the fine was for illegal burning. Barrett said it would be a misdemeanor requiring a fine of $900. (#12) NAVARRE HOUSING STUDY Jabbour asked the reason behind the study. Bressler said the main purpose of the study was to evaluate the housing conditions in the Navarre area, check to see if there was a need for grant funding for rehabilitation, and to gather information for use in the Comprehensive Plan update. A picture board displayed the housing found in Navarre. The study itself was broken into three parts: 1) mail out survey regarding conditions, ability to make repairs, and if there was interest in receiving grant funding; 2) field review of the properties; and 3) determination of percentages of afTordable housing in Navarre and the percentage affordable housing constitutes in Orono. There were four sub areas within the City. The residents were asked whether they rented or owned; majority were homeowners. It was found that half of the residents fell within the affordable housing guidelines for income. The majority of the homeownc-s said they were able to afford repairs. There was a strong interest shown towards application for grant funding. While nearly 50% of the homes were in good condition, 30% were not. The field findings noted housing type, the majority of which are single family homes. The majority of the homes w ere found to be in good to excellent conditkm, but concern is shown for the remaining that are not in good repair. As far as garnv s go. the most concern was for detached garages which tend to be less maintained, r. .v > bund that 20% of the yards were in poor appearance. Bressler said the assesse .; v-alur of housing for 1997 in Navarre is considered affordable. This correlates with the market values for 1996-97. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 (#12 - Navarre Housing Study - Continued) Kelley was informed that the number of affordable homes were 183. It was unknown what percentage is being mandated by the Met Council for affordability. Van Zomeren said the Navarre irea homes meeting the affordability criteria is 6% of the total homes in the City. Van Zomeren said Staff feels there is 24% of the housing that will be found to meet the affordability criteria. The average property value in Navarre is $107,000 with $220,000 overall in the City of Orono. The information will be used for exploring grant possibilities and updating the Comprehensive Plan. Other cities are assisting in reviewing affordable housing in the area. Jabbour said the Planning Commission was asking what grants are available. It was noted that the City has received CDBG funding in the past, though not for 1997. Jabbour commented regarding the Planning Department analyzing variance applications and cataloging them. He feels it is fruitless to amend zoning requirements as applicants will adjust their needs accordingly and will increase the number of variance requests accordingly. Van Zomeren responded that she feels this will result in obtaining a recommendation from the Planning Commission for elimination of some variances. She noted according to the oversize accessory chart, no variances are allowed and could be more restrictive. Van Zomeren said this information has allowed her to have a better understanding of what has been approved in the past. Jabbour noted the concern over drifting from cur main objectives. Peterson said she has been told that the Council was more objective in the past and believes the Planning Commission could be more restrictive. Jabbour urged that Staff checks with Council before fully developing an idea. Goetten said she would like to see the Planning Commission more restrictive in their approvals. She noted that this results in it being more difficult to change an application at the Council level. Van Zomeren said new application forms are being developed which will require more information to be supplied by the applicant. Flint noted that the analysis should not be tied into statistics from the Met Council. He indicated the City is trying to develop a community of different income levels. Jabbour noted that there should be no leeway given from the zoning code regardless of the cost of the residence. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Jabbour indicated that the City has received information from the Met Council which appears to indicate the density level of future development in Orono should be 2.3 houses per acre. He also reported he had a very positive meeting with representatives of Mn/DOT and the MCWT) regarding ponding for new Highway 12 and the impact of development density on Lake Minnetonka. Jabbour said he met with representatives of Hennepin Parks to work on completion of the trail, cooperative agreement, assistance with parks, trails, and recreation in the area, and cooperative efforts regarding Highway 12 and the Hwy 12 and CoRd 6 intersection. Jabbour said he drove the City with Hennepin Park representatives, who were impressed with what they saw. Goetten asked who Gaffron spoke to from the Met Council. Gaffron said he did not speak to anyone but was sent a table of expected household numbers projected out into the future. The number did not match Orono's zoning requirements. He has not yet contacted the Met Council for clarification. Goetten noted that she is a member of the Metropolitan Council's Land Use Advisory Committee and has been informing the committee about the City's development philosophy. She had thought they had a good understanding of the realities that were appropriate to the City. She asked Gaffron for a copy of the information so she can research it further. Jabbour said he is concerned that the density level in Orono is driven by the sewer units. He noted that low density is good for the eco*system. He would like to see the two acre density separated from its direct tie with sewering. Kelley agreed that it should be tied to water elevation and water quality of Lake Minnetonka. Jabbour indicated that 35% of the lakeshore of Lake Minnetonka is in Orono and over 40% of the surface water drainage to Lake Minnetonka comes through wetlands in Orono. Tom Maple has informed Jabbour that the 929.4' normal lake elevation is unrealistic and should be at 930'. Jabbour said Maple was in favor of the 5 acre dry buildable and would like to receive a copy of the City's philosophy from the Comprehensive Plan. Kelley noted that any assistance from other agencies will aid the City in their dealings with the Met Council. Flint referenced the urban sprawl effect citing examples in other cities. Jabbour said he was meeting with the Orono School Board and Minnetonka Beach representatives to work on a community effort regarding a school facilities referendum. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 (Mayor/Council Report - Continued) Flint reported that a master plan is being developed for the Luce Line Trail. He does not believe there are any plans to pave the portion which is in Orono. Kelley asked about snowmobiling. Flint said snowmobiling will not be extended. Flint noted that the Lake Minnetonka Regional Park being developed by Hennepin Parks could be used as an access to the Luce Line for snowmobilers. Jabbour noted access to the Luce Line can be obtained through Waconia as well. Goetten asked the status of the Ferndale Road project questioning when the public hearing will be held. Moorse said preliminary information has been received from Bonestroo regarding the feasibility study. Plymouth will be holding a public information meeting. Moorse asked that a decision be made whether a joint meeting should be held. Goetten said she thought the Orono Council was going to meet with the Plymouth Council in a joint work session. Moorse said that would be an option. Jabbour suggested the Council determine the opinion of the citizens first before any meeting with Plymouth. Moorse said he would get the information out to Council members prior to that time. Jabbour reiterated that a hearing will be held for the citizens before the meeting with the Plymouth Council. Jabbour extended congratulations to the Police Chief regarding the receipt of Best Jail Class 4" designation as noted in a letter from the Department of Corrections. ENGINEER REPORT (*#13) REQUEST FOR PAYMENT #6 NORTH LONG LAKE/LONG LAKE COUNTRY CLUB ADDITION SEWER IMPROVEMENT Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Request for Payment #6, North Long Lake Sanitary Sewer Project to Barbarossa & Sons in the amount of $16,945.72. Vote. Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#14) REQUEST FOR PAYMENT #5 BAY RIDGE AND BRACKETTS POINT SEWER IMPROVEMENT Goetten moved. Peterson seconded, to approve Request for Payment #5, Bracketts Point/Bay Ridge Sanitary Sewer Project to Barbarossa & Sons in the amount of $28,075.35. Vote; Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#15) REQUEST FOR PAYMENT #3 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD BIKE TRAIL Kelley noted that he was not in favor of the fence on Old Ciy'stal Ray Road and the cost of $5,000. If .oiw.- r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 (#15- Engineer's Report - Continued) Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Request for Payment #3, Old Crystal Bay Road Trail project to Buffalo Bituminous in the amount of $42,964.31. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 1, Kelley. Flint asked that the record show that the Council was not happy with the fence. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (#16) TOBACCO - ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 164,2ND SERIES Moorse reported that there are new regulations regarding the sale of tobacco as adopted in State legislation. The requirements can either be enforced by the City or deferred to the County. Goetten asked if the City did the enforcement for a year and found that they would prefer County enforcement, if that could be done. Moorse said he believed so. Goetten said she is appalled that the prohibition does not apply to cigars. It was noted that tobacco products includes cigars but the legislation does not prohibit self-service displays of cigars. Jabbour noted that these are found at Rick's Super Valu and O'Sullivan's. Moorse said he could check to see if the requirement could be made more restrictive. Moorse was asked if the State could be assessed for the time and energy to enforce the requirement. Moorse noted that the City could defer to the County for the enforcement, but the same taxpayers would pay for it. Peterson moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt City Tobacco Ordinance and the changes required by State and Federal Law, with the understanding that Staff will review the issue of cigars. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#18) FIRE, BURGLARY AND SAFETY AL.iRM REGULATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS - ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 165,2ND SERIES Moorse reported that the amendment is a change in the ordinance as it relates to fire, burglary, and safety alarms. The ordinance currently states that a fee would be charged onlv after the third false alarm. This amendment allows fora fee to be charged for the 0 second false alarm and is reflected in the fee schedule. The fee schedule is progressive. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 (#18 Alarm Regulations and Requirements - Continued) Jabbour felt charging for the second false alarm was too low in his opinion. He asked how much is charged for the first and subsequent false alarms. The second false alarm for police is $50, third is $100, fourth is $150, and fifth is $250; the fee for false fire o! ’.rnis increases at a greater pace. jdbbour moved. Peterson seconded, to adopt Ordinance No. 165, 2nd Scries, amending Ordinance No. 9.35. entitled "Fire, Burglary and Safety Alarm Regulations and Requirements", to enable a false alarm fee to be charged when a public safety alarm system reports more than one false alarm to the City in a single calendar year, Kelley asked what percentage of fire calls to the City is false calls. Moorse said the percentage of alarm calls is 42%, the majority of which are false. Kelley asked when the allocation costs with Long lake are reviewed, if the allocation is larger due to the number of alarm calls. He questioned if half are false calls, what the increment would be if these false calls were not included. It w as noted that about $90,000 a year is spent for fire protection, and one-third are probably false in nature. Moorse noted that this cost is based on the market value of homes and hours of service calls. He thought savings would be in the thousands of dollars. Kelley said the percentage is likely higher due to more alarm calls, and results in higher costs to the ta.xpayers. Kelley said the City needs to get a handle on this issue. Jabbour noted that the charge is per hour and not per call. Kelley questioned if the cost of false alarms is passed on to the taxpayer. Moorse agreed that is basically what occurs. Kelley asked that the number of hours for false alarms be calculated. Moorse confirmed for Goetten that there is no charge to homeowners when fires actually occur. (*#19) 1998 FEE SCHEDULE - ORDINANCE AND SUMMARY ORDINANCE FOR PUBLICATION NO. 166, 2ND SERIES Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to adopt Ordinance No. 166, 2nd Series, amending the City's fee schedule and summary ordinance for publication. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#20) RETIREMENT OF DOROTHY HALLIN, CITY CLERK - RESOLUTION NO. 4015 Jabbour indicated his great sadness in the resignation of Dorothy Hallin, who has serv ed the City for 27 years. Moorse indicated a retirement party will be held in Januar>’. 28 MINUTES OF THE REGUL AR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 (#20 - Retirement of Dorothy Hallin - Continued) Peterson moved, Goetten seconded, to accept Dorothy Hallin's resignation and adopt R esolution No. ’ 5 i.. appreciation fo*- Dorothy’s 27 yearv of dedicated service to the City. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#21) RESIGNATION OF CHRIS MILLER, ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR/MIS COORDINATOR Moorse noted accomplishments made by Miller during his tenure, specifically in the technology and MIS area. Council expressed regret in the resignation of Miller. Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to accept the resignation of Chris Miller from his position as Assistant Finance Director/MIS Coordinator effective December 18, 1997. Vote: Ayts 5, Nays 0. (*#22) COUNCIL LIAISON TO PARK COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS IN 1998 Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the schedule for Council attendance at the Park Commission and Planning Commission meetings during 1998. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. my) 1997 INTERFUND TRANSFERS AND LOAN PAYMENTS Moorse reported that the approval would authorize transfers that were previously approved as part of the 1997 budget. Kelley mo^ed, Flint seconded, to approve the interfund operating transfers, loan payments, and special assessment payments on City owned property as presented, effective December 31, 1997. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#24) AUTHORIZATION TO DISBURSE CITY FUNDS FOR CLAIMS RECEIVED Moorse noted that advance Council approval is required in order to continue bi-weekly disbursement of City funds for payment of claims since the meeting is the last Council meeting of the year. / 29 o M TMTiTr r%UMS\ k I'lMk ills MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 (#26 Canopy For Public Works Building Continued) Goetten asked if there were other options that could be pursued. Gappa indicated that changing the door location would cost as much. Vote; Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#27) 1998 POLICE SERVICES CONTRACT WITH THE CITIES OF MINNETONKA BEACH AND SPRING PARK Moorse reported of the need to renew the contract for police services. (#27 - 1998 Police Services Contract - Continued) Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the renewal of the Police Service Contracts with the cities of Minnetonka Beach and Spring Park for 1998 and to authorize the Mayor to sign the contract documents. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Jabbour asked Moorse about the meeting held with the Wright County Humane Society. Moorse said the society is open to considering a joint effort. Jabbour informed Council that Moorse was talking with other cities regarding building a facility which would be run by the Wright County Humane Society. He feels the society is in tune with the City's beliefs in handling of animals. Jabbour said he fears getting into a situation with another agency where their philosophy in handling animals is contrary to that of the City. Jabbour asked that the C ancil be part of the solution for determining a location and facility. Moorse indicated that the facility would be operated by the Wright County Humane Society and ^vould replace the existing facility in operation in Delano. The society is also looking for another facility in the western portion of Wright County. The easterly facility would ser\'e Orono and other lake area cities. (*#28) REAPPOINTMENT OF JAMES WHITE TO PARK COMMISSION Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the appointment of James White to a three year term on the Parks, Open Space, and Trails Commission. The term will begin on January 1, 1998 and will end on December 31, 2000. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#29) DONATION TO ORONO POLICE DEPARTMENT Goetten moved. Peterson seconded, to accept the donation of bullet resistant vest from Mr. Reed. Vote; Ayes 5, Nays 0. minutes of the regular orono city council MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT City Attorney Barrett had no report. (*#30) LICENSES Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the following license: Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Special Event Permit Jyland Development Spring Parade of Homes March 1998 at 425 Hunter Pass (*#31) BILLS Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0 ADJOURNMENT Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to adjourn at 11:35 p.m. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk 32 i\ SPECIAL ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING ^ MINUTES FOR TUESDAY, JANUARY 6, -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—— ----------------------------------------------------- ' ' Vr) ROLL The meeting was called to order by Mayor Jabbour at 8:00 a.m. Members present: Mayor Jabbour and Council Members Goetten, Kelley and Peterson. Members absent: Council Member Flint. Others present: Ron Moorse, City Administrator; Greg Gappa, Public Services Director; Tom Kellogg, Consultant Engineer; and Glenn Cook, Consultant Engineer. Mayor Jabbour indicated the item for Council consideration was a resolution endorsing candidates for appointment to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) Board. Mayor Jabbour pro''’ led background regarding the candidate review process. This is an opportunity for the cities within the Watershed District to have candidates appointed to the Board who support the views of the cities regarding the management of water resources. As none of the candidates proposed for endorsement are currently incumbents on the Board, Council Member Goetten asked who the incumbents are. Mayor Jabbour indicated he was not sure who all the incumbents are, but one is Woody Love from Shorewood. Mayor Jabbour indicated he is not familiar with the candidates proposed for endorsement but suggested the Council follow the suggestions made by the candidate interview board. The interview board included Howard Bennis, the Mayor of Deephaven and Ed Shukle, the City Manager of Me and. Council Member Kelley moved and Council Member Peterson seconded approval of the resolution endorsing candidates for appointment to the MCWD Board. Ayes 4, Nays 0. The special council meeting was adjourned at 8:20 a.m. ATTEST:Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: mim ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Name Brad Bressler Title Planning Assistant Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2275 Ted and Myrna Wolf 900 Willow Drive North Class II Final Subdivision-Resolution Zoning District: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District Lot Area:11.76 total acres (6.73 dry buildable) Application: The applicant proposes the division of the parcel into two lots, front and back, with access to the back lot provided via an outlot. The developer has met the requirements for final plat approval as stated in the approved resolution for preliminary plat approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To either approve or amend the enclosed resolution. r ► A RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF A PLAT AT 900 WILLOW DRIVE NORTH FILE NO. 2275 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision of a an existing lot into two lots by Theodore F. Wolf and Myma T. Wolf (hereinafter "the subdividers"); and WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all standards of the RR-iB one family rural residential zoning district; and WHEREAS, on September 8, 1997 the City Council adopted Resolution #3955 granting preliminary plat approval subject to meeting the following requirements for final plat approval: Plat: 1.Lot lines have been platted per preliminary survey by Mark S. Gronbcrg dated December 23, 1996 as revised on December 8, 1997. 2.Drainage and utility easements have been dedicated 10' along all exterior lot lines and 5' wide along interior lot lines. 3.Portions of the lot below the 985.5' OHWL have been designated as Dickey Lake. Page 1 cf 6 1 ’t' 4. The wetland on Lot 2 has been designated as a drainage easement. 5. The plat has been named Wolfs Run. Legal Documents: 1. A title opinion addressed to the City has been signed by the property owners. 2.A legal description of the drainage (wetland) easement has been provided (Exhibit A). Fees: 1. The $200.00 legal review and filing fee has been paid. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the final plat application for Theodore F. Wolf and Myma T. Wolf for Wolfs Run subdivision located at 900 Willow Drive North per the survey dated December 11, 1996 as revised on December 8, 1997 by Mark S. Gronberg of Coffin and Gronberg attached as Exhibit B, subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. A park dedication fee of $7,600.00 (8%) must be paid prior to final subdivision approval. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with either the Hennepin County Recorder's office or Registrar of Title's office on or before January 12, 1999 together with a certified original copy of mis resolution and executed copies of the easements noted. The approval granted by this resolution shall expire if tlie plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Adopted by the City Council of the City cf Orono, Miimesota at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of January, 1998. Page 2 of 6 ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner (s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of January, 1998 by Gabriel Jabbour and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public r I f Page 3 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of ) ss. for said county, personally appeared 1 99_ before me a Notary Public within and taown to me 10 be the person(s) descnM in and who executed the foregoing instrument and aeknowledged that he (they) exeeuted -.te same as his (their) free act and de^7 ““ NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this____day of for said county, personally appeared 199_ before me a Notary Public within and notary public Page 4 of 6 r 12/24/1937 10:57 473-4455 COFFItl •3F'Cit IEEPi3 COFFIN A GRONBERO. INC. •umv.Yi^.0. aNoiMnaiMo Awo LAND AoKNMma 4«t.A TAMAAACK AVPNUI! LONG LAice. MINN, pepfa 4TS-41 Ai PA«3iE nj Exli»bM A LEGAL DESCRIPTION for FLOWAGE & CONSERVATION EASEMENT FOR WOLFS RUN ORONO. MINNESOTA DECEMBER 24. 1997 and cons-n/ation purposes over the drainage easement as dedicated to the public in Lot 2, Block 1, WOLFS RUN A REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 8/26/97 ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Name Liz Van Zomeren Title City Planner Administrator Reviewed: Item Description; #2275 Ted and Myrna Wolf 900 Willow Drive North Agenda Section: Zoning mm u p A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF A PLAT AT 900 WILLOW DRIVE NORTH - FILE NO. 2275 WHEREAS, TTieodore F. Wolf and Myma T. Wolf, (hereinafter the "subdividers”) on July 24, 1997, filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a two lot residential plat of property legally described as: That part of the North 316.80 feet of the South 825.00 feet of the South Half of the Southwest Quarter lying West of the East 990 feet thereof. Section 27, Township 118, Range 23 (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono's Zoning, Platting emd On-Site Septic Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 18, 1997, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on September 8, 1997, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of Theodore F. and Myma T. Wolf noting the following findings of fact: 1. 2. 3. The property is located within the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. The property contains a total of approximately 11.76 acres, 6.73 acres are considered dry buildable. The proposed plat contains two residential lots that each meet the 2 acre minimum. Lot 1, the fi-ont lot, contains 4.01 acres. Lot 2, the back lot, contains 7.6+ acres, 3.8 acres to the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL), 2.7 acres to the wetland delineation. Page 1 of 5 ’ k k i .1 i 4. 5. 6. 7. The property is located in the Shoreland Overlay District. Lot 2 is a lakeshore lot contiguous to Dickey Lake, a natural environment lake. Lot 2 meets the required 200' width at the OHWL, 985.5' elevation, of Dickey Lake. Access to Lot 2 shall be provided by Outlot A, a private driveway outlot instead of the road extension of Outlot B through Shadowood. Lot 1 shall continue to have access provided by the existing loop driveway. The existing trees and vegetation 50' on either side of the proposed lot line meet the screening requirements of the subdivision ordinances. 8. A primary and secondary septic area have been located for Lot 2. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon either one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat application for Theodore F. Wolf and Myma T. Wolf for the property located at 900 Willow Drive North per the survey dated December 23, 1996, by Marie S. Gronberg of Coffin and Gronberg, Inc. attached as Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions: 1.Prior to new construction, future owners shall be responsible for staking and protecting the primary and alternate septic sites. The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Planner/Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of each month. 1.Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1" = 200'. Drawing to include: A. Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Mark S. Gronberg dated December 23, 1996. B. Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' wide along all perimeter property lines, except the shoreline of Dickey Lake, and 5' each side of internal property lines. Page 2 of 5 J C. Portions of lot located below 985.5' to be designated as Dickey Lake. D. The wetland designated on Lot 2 shall be shown as a drainage easement on the plat. E. Dedication of T of right-of-way of Willow Drive North. F. Naming of plat. 2. Legal documents required: A. Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. B. The applicant shall provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. 3. Fees to be paid: Total due: $ 200.00* A. Legal review and filing fees = $ 200.00 B.Park dedication fee of $7,600.00 (8% of $95,000.00) to be paid upon the filing of the final plat and associated documents. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 8th day of September, 1997. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Page 3 of 5 J I i STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 8th day of September, 1997 by Gabriel Jabbour & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 'C/. % REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION % ^ O.N ^1: DATE: January 12, 1998 ITEM NO : b % Department Approval: Name Gregor}' A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administraj(or Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer's Report Item Description: Public Hearing for Edgewood Hills Sanitary Sewer Project The Edgewood Hills area, located off Woodhill Road, was included in the recent MUSA expansion for sanitary sewer installation. The project area residents have sent a letter requesting that the City begin the process for an assessment sewer project. It is proposed that a sewer project for this area will be funded by assessment of all the costs to the benefiting properties. A City cost contribution for this project is not envisioned. This project will have eight sewer connections. A feasibility study has been completed for this project. The recommended alignment is to directional bore the pipe under Woodhill Road. The option of installing sewer in the backyards was investigated, but required a substantial amount of extra pipe and is not cost effective. The estimated unit cost for this option is $29,400. The preferred pipe alignment in the road has two options for installation of the services to each house. Option A, with an estimated assessment of $21,140 per unit, is to directional bore the service lines all the way to the backyard to within twenty feet of the existing septic system. This will increase the assessed cost to the property owners, but will result in less cost and disturbance for the system hookup by the plumbers. It should be more cost effective to bore the entire service line than to have each owner pay to have this work completed by individual plumbers. Also, most small plumbing contractors do not have access to directional boring equipment and would open cut the service resulting in more yard disturbance. The hookups for this project are expensive because all of the septic systems are behind the houses in the backyards. Option B with an estimated cost of $17,717 per un^ is to install approximately the first sixty feet of service pipe. This will reduce the assessed costs, but increase the hookup costs and site disturbance for individual homeowners. Information on the preferred option can be obtained from the property owners at the public hearing. A resolution is attached to accept the feasibility smdy and schedule a public hearing for this project. We have scheduled the hearing for 7:00 P.M. at the regularly scheduled City Council meeting on February 9th. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to pass the resolution to accept the feasibility study for the Edgewood Hills sanitary sewer project and schedule a public hearing for 7:00 P.M. Monday, February 9th. . ,r* ^ II I II f M fut t 11 1II mil If 11 J ! I i I I : i ■ A RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT ANP CALLING HEARING ON EDGEWOOD HILLS SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 3992 of the Council adopted October 27, 1997, a report has been prepar<^d by the City Engineer in reference to the Edgewood Hills sanitary sewer improvement, and this report was received by the Council on January 12,1998; and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessar)', cost effective, and feasible. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, 1.The Council will consider the installation of such sanitary sewer improvement in accordance with the report and the asv.‘ssment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $ 169,119. 2.A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 9th day of February, 1998 in the Council Chambers, 2750 Kelley ParKway, at 7:00 p.m. and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 12th day of January, 1998. Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: January ^12, 199^^ ITEM NO. Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer ’s Report Item Description: Request for Payment, County Road 6 Reconstruction Project We have received an invoice from Hennepin County for the County Road 6 reconstruction project .T^ payment is for 95% of the City’s share of construction costs and our prorated share OT the engineering costs per the Cooperative Agreement between Orono and Hennepin County. These costs ^e eligible for Reimbursement from the City’s Municipal State Aid funds. We will apply for reimbursement of these funds after payment to Hennepin County is made COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve this Request for Payment cf $110,319.37 to Hennepin County for the County Road 6 reconstruction project >■>; '3s-' ‘ -' %' •-!' December 19, 1997 Glen Cook, Director of Public Works - City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway, PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 County Project: 9444 on CSAH 6 Agreement: PW 53-08-96 Dear Mr. Cook: For the City of Orono’s participation in the above project, the following is enclosed: 1. Invoice #28086 in the amount of $110,319.37. 2. A copy of Hennepin County’s Report of State Aid Contract. 3. A copy of the Initial Division of Cost Summary. 4. A copy of the Initial Allocation of Quantities and Amounts. 5. A copy of the Abstract of Bids. We will be invoicing the City of Orono at a future date for its share of right-of-way and surface water management (treatment pond) expenditures. If you have any questions, please call me at 348-8977. Sincerely, ^I'duyiLC Kathleen Caldwell Financial Management & Accounting Enclosures Department of Public Works 417 North 5* Street, Suite 310 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401-1360 (612)348-8977 FAX;(612)348-9710 F:\FMA\DPW\C0NTBILL\9444\0R0N0 INITIAL LETTER.doc ! ! INITIAL DIVISION OF COST SUMMARY SAP. 27-606-15COUNTY PROJECT 9444 ON CSAH NO. 6 BETWEEN WEST OF TOWNUNE ROAD TO ORCHARD PARK ROADTIED TO MSAP 152-020-09BASED ON UNIT PRICES OF CONTRACT NO. 9444AB WITH BUFFALO BITUMINOUS Department of Public Works Hennepin County Financial Management & Accounting 417 North 5“* Street, Suite 310 Minneapolis, MN 55401-1360 INVOICE# 28086 Date: December 23,1997 Billed To:rMrGleiTCotdc^ii^ fOh. f i CityofOtono Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dln-iCVk. 6n.l60n^ AOf rmuc siM/]Lis Description For the City of Orono ’s participation in Agreement PW 53-08-96, County Project 9444 on CSAH 6 in Orono, the City’s initial participation is indicated below: Contract Construction Less 5% retainage 18% Engineering Less 5% retainage Amount $98,411.57 ($4,920.58) $17,714.08 ($ 885.70) $93.490.99 $16,828.38 AMOUNT DUE BY FEBRUARY 6,1998 $110,319.37 All payments to the County must be poi»ra«k«d by the date due cr «111* p«iully of 1% pa mooOv or fraction thereof on Am unpaid b»knce will be durged to the City. The City shall pay the amoimt due as stat'id on the statement, notwit hstanding any dispute of ludi amount Should a disputed amount be resolved in favor of the City, the County shall reimburse the disputed amount plus daily inter^ thereon calculated from the date such disputed amount was received by the County. Daily interest shall be at the rale of ISi per month on the disputed amount REMIT BY CHECK, MONEY ORDER OR DRAFT PAYABLE TO: HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Anention: Diarie Lowe Hennepin County Department of Public Works 417 5“* Street North, Suite 310 Minneapolis, MN 55401-1360 Please print the invoice number on your remittance. \\MADRlD'PWESTEAM\FMA\DPW\CONTBILL\9444'.ORONO INITIAL INVOICE.doc ■*:nv •'' Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Janua^ ITEM NO.: . 998 Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Administrator's Report Item Description: Open Burning Policy Revisions Proposed changes to the City’s open burning regulations were presented to the Council at the Dumber 8,1997 meeting. In summary, the proposed changes would £liow for recreational fires with an annual permit. Small brush disposal fires would be allowed with a 2-acre minimum lot size, and large brush disposal fires would be allowed with a 5-acre minimum lot size. The City Council and residents who commented supported the proposed changes with several mino r revisions requested by the Council. The ordinance has been revised to reflect these requested changes. Permit Time Limits The permit length for brush disposal fires has been increased from 30 days to 60 days to allow for more time to complete burning during favorable weather conditions. The annual permit time frame for recreational fires has not been changed. Permit revocation The section on permit revocation has been revised to include a 6-month moratorium on issuance of burning permits when a permit is revoked for violation of permit conditions. This moratorium will apply both to Ae same applicant, or to the same property. Including both conditions will prevent circumventing the moratorium, on additional permits, by having different applicants applying for permits on properties where burning permits have been revoked. Prohibition on Burning Imported Materials Additional language has been added to strengthen the prohibition on burning of materials brought in from other properties to a burning site. Hours for Open Burning We have added hours when open burning is permitted. The proposed hours are from 7:00 A.M. to 11:00 P.M. The 11:00 P.M. time is to allow for recreational fires in the evenings. Recreational fires after 11:00 P.M. may cause problems with noise from groups of people outside at events. This is a new item that we have added to the proposed rules and we would like to obtain Council input on these time limits. COUNCH. ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the proposed revisions to the City of Orono Open Burning Requirements. OPEN BURNING PERMIT CITY OF ORONO, Box 66 (2750 Kelley Parkway) Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Date Issued: __ Expiration Date: Permit No.: Permit to be mailed:, or picked up:_ SITE ADDRESS:. Name: DATE: Mailing Address:_______________ Agent (if applicable):___________ FOR THE PURPOSE OF BURNING Phone: (h) _City:___;Zip:. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS are to be completed before the inspector arrives. Sites inspected subject to availability of staff time. (If inspector has to re-inspect site because items were incomplete, there will be a $20.00 charge per re>inspection): 1. Site address must be posted and visible from the street. Where more than one house is served by the same private driveway or unnamed private road, additional sets of numbers shall be placed at every fork or other driveway as necessary to direct traffic to every house including the house farthest from the street. 2. Bum pile must be staked at bum site meeting the following: Small Bmsh Disposal Fires (> 2 Acre Lot Size) Recreational Fires (All Lot Sizes) - Minimum 75' from Buildings - Minimum 50' from Lot Lines - 8' Maximum Diameter, 4' Maximum Height - 60 Day Permit - Inspection is required for each bum - Notify both the Police and Fire Departments for each bum - Minimum 50' from Buildings - Minimum 25' from Lot Lines - 3' Max. Diameter, 3' Max. Height - Annual Permit - Inspection required before permit issuance. An inspection is not required for each bum - Notify Police Department only for each bum I.arge Brush Disposal Fires (> 5 Acre Lot Size) - Minimum 150' from Buildings - Minimum 75' from Lot Lines -15' Maximum Diameter, 6' Maximum Height - 60 Day Permit - Inspection is required for each bum - Notify both the Police and Fire Departments for each bum 3. Draw a map on the back side of application locating the bum pile on your property. 4. If these conditions are not met, the permit will be denied and you may not apply for another permit for 30 days. 5. No permit fee is required except for more than 3 permits for brush disposal fires per year. All organizations and individuals regardless of tax status will be charged a $100.00 annual fee for more than 3 brush disposal fire permits per year. VIOLATIONS OF PERMIT CONDITIONS MAY SUBJECT PERMITTEE TO CRIMINAL AND/OR CIVIL ACTION ALL BURNS MUST BE REPORTED including bums on evenings and weekends to the Orono Police Department during regular business hours and a minimum of 30 minutes before burning, 473- 7710 (8:00-4:30, Monday-Friday). For Small and Large Brush Disposal Fires, in addition to the Police Department, the Fire Department must be notified - Long Lake (473-9701), Maple Plain (479- 0506), Mound (472-3555) and Wayzata (473-0234). (Over) r i-t. f r. ■ ' I ■ PROHIBITED MATERIALS ARE: brush, oils, rubber, plastics, tires, building materials and chemically treated materials such as railroad ties, treated lumber, composite shingles, tar paper, insulation, composition board, sheet rock, wiring, paint, hazardous and industrial solid waste. 1 AGREE: Not to bum any prohibited materials. • Not to bum if there is a practical alternative method for disposal of material such as chipping or composting. To use a clean burning device to start the fire. Not to conduct burning during any air quality alert. - Not to bum paper or cardboard except as provided under Minnesota Statutes 17.135. To have this permit available at the bum site for inspection. - That prevailing wind must be away from nearby occupied buildings and as far away from any highway or public road and controlled so as that a trafTlc hazard is not created. - To keep this fire under control and to assume responsibility for all damages and costs that may result from burning done under this permit. - That fires will not be allowed to smolder without flame. - To provide a water supply and an adult to attend this fire until completely extinguished. - To extinguish the fire immediately if this permit is revoked. • That no material may be brought into be burned from another site. This permit mav be revoked should anv or all of the following conditions exist: 1. A fire hazard exists or develops during the course of the bum. 2. A public safety hazard exists or may exist if the bum is implemented or is allowed to continue. 3. Any conditions agreed to have been violated. REVOCATION OF THIS PERMIT WILL RESULT IN A 6 MONTH MORATORIUM ON ISSUANCE OF BURNING PERMITS TO THE APPLICANT OR FOR OPEN BURNING AT THIS PROPERTY. Signature ! ATTEST, BY MY SIGNATURE, THAT I HAVE READ AND WILL COMPLY WITH THE CONDITIONS OF, AND ANY ATTACHMENTS TO THIS PERMIT; AND THAT I AM THE LANDOWNER OR HAVE PERMISSION OF THE LANDOWNER TO BURN AT THE ABOVE BURN SITE LOCATION. I ACKNOWLEDGE THAT VIOLATIONS OF PERMIT CONDITIONS MAY SUBJECT ME TO CRIMINAL AND/OR CIVIL ACTIONS AND/OR REVOCATION OF BURN PERMIT PRIVILEGES IN THE FUTURE. MAP (Lot Size Approved by:Inspected by:Date: InspectorsComments:__________ Fire Department: ____Long Lake Maple Plain Mound Wayzata This ptrmit is valid for open burning as allowed and specified in Stale Statute 88.01 to 88.22, 88.75, 88.76, Minn. Uniform Fire Code, and local ordinances. The permittee is granted permission to bum the above described materials at the specified location during the dates listed above. J ORDINANCE NO., SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE REGULATING OPEN BURNING WITHIN THE CITY OF ORONO The City Council of Orono ordains as follows: Section 1. Section 9.30 oTthe Orono City Code is hereby deleted. Section 2. The Orono Code is hereby amended by the addition of Section 9.30 as follows: Burning. Subd. 1. Piuposc. The puipose of this section is to establish permitted categories of open bum events within the City of Orono and provide for a permitting process for burning. Subd. 2. Dsfinitions. For the purposes of this section, the terms defined herein have the meanings given them. a. Open Burning. Open burning means the burning of any matter if the resultant combustion products are emitted directly to the atmosphere without passing through a stack, duct or chimney. Open burning includes Recreational Fires, Small Brush Disposal Fires, and Large Bmsh Disposal Fires, fires for fire department training purposes, and fires for maintenance of native prairie areas. Rficrgfltional Fires- Recreational fires are allowed on any *!«2C lot provided that all other permit conditions can be met. Recreational fire means a fire set with approved starter fuel no more than three (3) feet in height and diameter, using dry, clean wood; producing little detectable smoke, odor or soot beyond the property line; conducted vnth an adult tending the fire at all times; for recreational, ceremonial,’ food preparation or social purposes; extinguished completely before quitting the occasion; and respecting weather conditions, neighbors, burning bans, and air quality so Aat nuisance, health or safety hazards will not be created. Mobile cooking devices such as manufactured hibachis, charcoal grills, wood smokers and propane or natural gas devices are not defined as recreational fires. Recreational Fire Sites shall not be located closer than fifty (50) feet to any structure or twenty-five (25) feet from any lot line. An adequate water supply for fire suppression purposes must be provided.{I I c. Small Brush Disposal Fires. A minimum lot size of 2 acres is required for small brush disposal fires. Small brush disposal means a fire set with approved starter fluid no more than 8' in diameter and 4' in height using any clean wood, producing minimal smoke, odor or soot beyond the property line; conducted with an adult tending the fire site at all times; extinguished completely before leaving the site; and respecting weather conditions, neighbors, burning bans, and air quality so that nuisance, health or safety hazards will not be created. An adequate water supply for fire suppression purposes must be provided. Only materials generated on site may be burned. Burning of materials brought onto the property from other sites is prohibited. d. Lar ge Brush Disposal Fires. A minimum lot size of 5 acres is required for large brush disposal fires. Large brush disposal fires means a fire set with approved starter fluid no more than 15' in diameter and 6' in height using any clean wood, producing minimal smoke, odor or soot beyond the property line; conducted with an adult tending the fire site at all times; extinguished completely before leaving the site; and respecting weather conditions, neighbors, burning bans, and air quality so that nuisance, health or safety hazards will not be created. An adequate water supply for fire suppression purposes must be provided. Only materials generated on site may be burned. Burning of materials brought onto the propert>' from other sites is prohibited. e. Fire Department Training Fires. A fire used for the purpose of fire department training under the conditions of a permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. f. Native Prairie Restoration Fires. Fires used for the purposes of Native Prairie Maintenance conducted under the supervision of qualified individuals or firms specializing in this type of work. g. Starter Fuels. Starter Fuels means dry, untreated, unpainted kindling, branches or cardboard, or charcoal fire starter. Paraffin candles and alcohols are permitted as starter fuels and as aids to ignition only. Propane gas torches or other clean gas burning devices causing minimal pollution must be used to start an Open Bum. h. Wood. Wood means dry, clean fuel only as a twigs, branches, limbs, "presto logs," charcoal, cordwood or untreated dimensional lumber. "Wood" does not include wood that is green, with leaves or needles, rotten, wet, oil soaked, or treated with paint, glue or preservatives. Clean pallets may be used for recreational fires when cut into three (3) foot lengths. r Subd. 3. Prohibited Materials. No person shall conduct, cause or permit open burning of oils, petro fuels, rubber, plastics, chemically treated materials, or other materials which produce excessive or noxious smoke such as tires, railroad ties, treated, painted or glued wood, composite shingles, tar paper, insulation, composition board, sheetrock, wiring, paint or paint fillers. No person shall conduct, cause or permit open burning of hazardous waste or salvage operations, or open burning of solid waste generated from an industrial or manufacturing process or from a service or commercial establishment or building material generated from demolition of commercial or institutional structures. No person shall conduct, cause or permit open burning of discarded material resulting from the handling, processing, storage, preparation, serving or consumption of food. Subd. 4. Permit Required for Open Burning . No person shall start or allow any open burning on any property in the City of Orono without first having obtained an Open Burning Permit. Subd. 5. Purposes Allowed for Open Burning . Open Bum Permits may be issued only for the following purposes: a. Elimination of fire or health hazard that cannot be abated by other practical means. b. Ground thawing for utility repair and construction. c. Disposal of vegetative matter for managing forest, prairie or wildlife habitat, and in the development and maintenance of land and rights-of-way where chipping, composting, landspreading or other alternative methods are not practical. d. Disposal of diseased trees generated on site, diseased or infected nursery stock, diseased bee hives. e. Recreational Fires for recreational, ceremonial, food preparation or social purposes. f Fires for the purpose of fire department training. Fires for training purposes require a permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Subd. 6. Permit Application for Open Burning and Permit Fees. Open Burning Permits shall be obtained by making application on a form prescribed and adopted by the City of Orono. ^ ... n 1^1 I iii>iiiBaii r MiiA, ( An Op .n Burning Permit may require a non-reftindable application fee. Permit fees shall be set annually by City Council Resolution. However, the City Council may at other times amend its Resolution setting the fees as it deems necessary. The fees established by City Council Resolution shall continue to be the required fee until amended by a Resolution. Fees collected shall be retained by the City administrative costs of issuing permits. Subd. 7. Permit Process for Open Burning. Upon receipt of the completed Open Burning Permit application and permit fee, a City of Orono staff person shall determine that the requirements for open burning under this Code are satisfied. Thereafter, a Permit may be issued. a. Recreational Fire inspection requirements include an inspection of the bum site by City staff before a permit is issued. Reinspection of the site is not required before conducting each bum within the permit time limits. b. Small and Large Brush Disposal Fires, Fire Department Training Fires, and Native Prairie Restoration Fires inspection requirements include an inspection, of the initial bum site, by city staff before a permit is issued. Reinspection of the site is required before conducting any additional bums within the permit time limits. c. Notification requirements include notifying the Orono Police Department for any open bum including Recreational Fires. For Small and Large Brush Disposal Fires, Fire Department Training Fires, and Native Prairie Restoration Fires in addition to notifying the Orono Police Department, the fire department having jurisdiction must also be notified. Subd. 8. Time Period for Permits. Permits for Recreational Fires are valid for one year from the date of issuance. Permits for all other fires are valid for 60 days from the date of issuance. Subd. 9. Hours for Open Burning. Open burning is allowed only during the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 11 :00 p.m. Subd. 10. Permit Holder Responsibility. Prior to starting an Open Bum, the Permit holder shall be responsible for confirming that no burning ban or air quality alert is in effect. Every Open Bum event shall be constantly attended by the Permit holder or his/her competent adult representative. The Open Bum fire shall be completely extinguished before the Permit holder or his/her representative leaves the site. It is the responsibility of the Permit holder to have a valid Permit, as required by this section, available for inspection on the site by the City staff, Orono Police Department, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), or Department of Natural Resources (DNR). 1 III at ■■rviBii f » aa 1 I. Ik. i I The Permit holder is responsible for compliance and implementation of all general conditions, special conditions and the bum event safety plan as established in the Permit issued. Subd. 11. Revocation of Open Burning Permit. The Open Burning Permit is subject to revocation at the discretion of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Department of Natural Resources, the applicable Fire Chief, City staff or Orono Police Department. Reasons for revocation include, but are not limited to: a fire hazard existing or developing during the course of the bum, any of the conditions of the Permit being violated during the course of the bum, pollution or nuisance conditions developing during the course of the bum, a fire smoldering with no flame present or burning of materials brought onto the property from another site. Revocation of an open burning permit will result in a 6 month moratorium for issuance of open burning permits for the applicant or subject property. Subd. 12. Denial of Open Burning Permit. If established criteria for the issuance of an Open Burning Permit are not met or during review of said application, it is determined that a practical alternative method of disposal of the material exists, or a pollution or nuisance condition would result, or if a bum event safety plan cannot be drafted to the satisfaction of City staff, then the City of Orono staff person may deny the Open Burning Permit application. Applications for an open burning permit within 6 months of the revocation of a previous permit will be denied. This 6 month moratorium will apply to both permits issued to the same applicant or for the same property. Subd. 13. Burning Ban or Air Quality Alert. No Recreational Fire or Open Bum will be permitted when the City's Fire Chief, Fire Marshall, City’s Police Chief or DNR has officially declared a burning ban due to potential hazardous fire conditions or when the MPCA has declared an Air Quality Alert. Subd. 14. Rules Adopted bv Reference. Minnesota Statutes 88.16 to 88.17 and 88.171 and Minnesota Uniform Fire Code are hereby adopted by reference and made a part of this Orainance as if fully set forth herein. Subd. 15. Penalty- Any person violating any provision of this chapter is guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction, shall be punished by a fine and/or imprisonment. J r Subd. 16. Liability. In addition to any criminal liability, the person violating any provision of this Chapter shall be responsible for all costs incurred by the City, and fire department, and any adjoining property owners, as a result of the bum, including, but not limited to, fire suppression costs, property damage, personal injury and administrative fees. Section 3. Adoption and Publication. This ordinance shall be published in The Pioneer and The Laker newspapers and become effective immediately upon publication. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota on this _____. 199 _by a vote of____ayes and_____nays. day of ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor AMTV* iiTi i~iiT ni' ~ni fn i iirmi iig MiilniTiBiiiaii ■ d I iinini^Br I 111 ------ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Department Approval: Name Title Administrator Reviewed: % DATE: January sflW <oITEM NO: ^ Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Promotion of Lin Vee to City Clerk Position COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: ‘vi ^3 '0; REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION % Department Approval: Name Title Administrator Reviewed: DATE: Janu^^Af»l998 ITEM NO: Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Appointment to Full Time Secretary Position The appointment of Carole Haseman to the Secretary/Deputy City Clerk position creates a vacancy m the full time Secretaiy position. Fortunately, Jamie Gemar i^o has over 10 years of experience with the city in a part-time capacity is well qualified to move into the full time Secretaiy position. It is recommended that Jamie Gemar be appointed to the full time Secretaiy position at Step 3 of uav Level 4 effective January 20, 1998. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED; Motion to appoint Jamie Gemar to the full time Secretary position at Step 3 of pay Level 4 effective January 20,1998. COUNCIL WE:ht|,\*3 JAN 12 199J REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Department Approval: Name Title Administrator Reviewed: CITY OF ORONO DATE: January 8,1998 ITEM NO: j ( Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Appointment of Ron Olson to Assistant Finance Director/MlS Coordinator Position T he resignation of Chris Miller created a vacancy in the Assistant finance Director/MlS Coordinator position. Fortunately Ron Olson, who was recently hired as Management Analyst/Accountant, is well qualified to move into the Assistant Finance Director/MIS Coordinator position. Ron has performed exceptionally well in his first months with the city, and has taken on a number of Assistant Finance Director duties in Chris Miller's absence. Although the shift to the Assistant Finance Director position will not involve a pay adjustment, both Ron Olson and the Finance Director believe the city will benefit most from Ron's range of skills and abilities if he is in the Assistant Finance Director position. It is recommended that Ron Olson be appointed to the Assistant Finance Director/MIS Coordinator position effective January 13, 1998. Reconfiguration of Management Analvst/Accountant Position The Management Analyst/Accountant position was created to expand the responsibilities of the utility billing/payroll specialist position to provide assistance to the Public Works maintenance department in areas ranging from information organization to long term financial projections. This position was ideally suited to the former incumbent, but is not the most effective way to meet the needs of both the Finance Department and the Public Works maintenance department. Staff is recommending returning to the Utility Billing/Payroll Specialist position to meet the needs of the Finance Depaitment. The Public Works Department needs, in relation to financial projections and other finance-related needs, can be met by the current finance staff. The plan to meet the information organization needs of the Public Works Department has not been finalized. Because this does not require a full-time position, one option is to hire a part-time data assistant. The part- time data assistant position could be funded, in large part, using the difference between the current Management Analyst/Accountant position pay and the proposed Utility Billing/Payroll Specialist pay. In order to get the Finance Department up to a full staffing level, the Utility Billing/Payroll Specialist position will be filled as soon as possible. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the appointment of Ron Olson to the position of Assistant Finance Director/MIS Coordinator effective January 13, 1998. r REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Jss. DATE: January 8,199^ ITEM NO: / ^ Department Approval: . Name Tom Kuehn Title Finance Director Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: 1998 Application for Coverage Under the LMCIT Self-Insurance Worker's Compensation Plan Attachment: 1.) Application for Coverage Form 2.) Estimated 1998 Premium Quotation We have received the renewal premium quotation for worker compensation insurance from tl;e League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) for the year 1998. The gross premium for 1998 is $40,989, which is reduced by our experience modification of .70 and a premium discount of 5.5%, resulting in a net initial premium of $26,441. This is a decrease of $3,302 or 11.1% less than the 1997 initial premium. The decrease is due primarily to a reduction in the base rate for most classifications of between 5.6% and 25.2% from 1997. The net initial premiums for the prior three years were: $41,444 for 1995, $30,583 for 1996, and $29,743 for 1997. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of the 1998 Application for Coverage under the L MCIT Self-Insured Worker's Compensation Plan and award of the 1998 worker compensation insurance to the LMCIT for the initial net premium of $26,441, effective January 1, 1998. r League of Minnesota Cities insurance Trust Group Self-Insured Workers' Compensation Plan Administrator Berkley Administrators 145 University Avenue West SL Paul, MN 55103-2044 Phone (612) 281-2100 Notice of Premium Options for Standard Premiums of $25,000 - $50,000 The‘City* ORGNC-0// 'j5-vv'I'5ic-!2 ^ mm • • ‘J li'- CRYSTAL EAY V i /O i / i Agreement No.: Agreement Period: From: U hN 55552 -:*0-:'0 Enclosed is a quotation for workers' compensation deposit premium. Deductible options are now available in return for a premium credit applied to your estimated standard premium of $ . The deductible will apply 1*1 I /Vi * •* J OC'Tf per occurrence to paid medical costs only. There is no aggregate limit. As w alternative, cities with a standard premium in e.xcess of S25,000 may select from several retro-rated premium options. The final net cost under the retro-rated option equals the audited standard premium times the minimum factor plus losses and all loss-related costs, not to exceed the audited standard premium times the maximum factor. The net cost for each retro option based on your estimated payroll, would be between the minimum and maximum amounts shown below, depending upon your losses. Adjustments will be made approximately six months after the close of your agreement year and annually thereafter until all claims are closed. These adjustments will be based on audited payroll amounts and reserved as well as paid losses. Ple^e indicate below the premium option you wish to select. You may choose only one, and you cannot change options during the agreement period. OPTIONS 1 Regular Premium Option NET DEPOSIT PREMIUM Deductible Options:5a4Hi . j 4 5 6 7 □□□□□□ Deductible Premium Credit ner Occurrence Credit Amount $250 3%5ii. 500 4.5%1591.55150 1,000 6%175£.54719 2,500 10%5369.55572 5,000 13.5%3675.MB • mm 10,000 18%5165.51576 Retrospectively Rated Premium Options: Retro-Rated Est. ftlinimum Minimum Factor Premium 8 D 85.4% 5A505. 9 □ 79.4% 10 □ 68.8% 55751. 197A0. Maximum Factor 115% 125% 150% Est. Maximum (See"l above Premium for net deposit 3£99i. premium) 55665. 45056. This should be signed by an authorized representative of the city requesting coverage. One of the above options must be selected. Please return a signed copy of this notice to us with payment and make checks payable to the LMCIT. L /f'f. --------- TideTiUe / Date ^ignature Tide / Date For more information on the premium options that apply to your city, refer to the enclosed brochures. LM4502(8/y7) r League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust Group Self-Insured Workers’ Compensation Plan Administrator Berkley Administrators 145 University Avenue West SL Paul, MN 55103-2044 Phone (612) 281-2100 Self-Insured Workers' Compensation Quotation (RENEWAL of Agrssmsnt No. 02-00056S-12) ORONC' 01/01/199S ':'1/01/1?99 STREET CONSTRUCTION I MAINTENANCE WATERWORKS POLICE ’ CLERICAL MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES ELECTED OR APPOINTED OPFICIALS ANIMAL CONTROL CLUB-COUNTRY/ uOLF ESTIMATED DEPOSIT CODE RATE PAYROLL PREMIUM 5506 4.12 272450.11225. 7320 2.90 49095.1424. 7720 2.82 789385.22261. 8S!0 0.44 399050.1756. 9410 0.89 348565.3102. 9411 0.34 18200.62. S831 1.67 12000.200. 9060 1.53 62650.959. Manual Premium 40909. EKDsrisnrs Modification 0.70 Standard Premium 28692. Managed! Care Credit OX 0. Deductible Credit 0%0. Premium Discount 2231. Discounted Standard Premium 26441. Insurance Trust Discount OX 0. Net Deposit Premium 26441. I quotation is for a deposit prem um based on your estimate of payroU. Your final actual premium wiU DC computed ^er an audit of payroll subsequent to the close of your agreement year and will be subject to revisions m rates, payrolls Md experience modification. While you are a member of the LMCIT Workers' be ehgible to participate in distributions from the Trust based upon claims experience Any Questions Please call Barb Meyer at 612-215-4173; LM4410 (8/97) r JAN 1 2 1998 CITYOFORONOREQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: January 8,1998 ITEM NO: /3 Department Approval: Name Title Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Selection of Dates and Times for Council Work Sessions There are a number of key issues to be addressed by the Council in the coming weeks and months. These include the following: 1.Update of the City's Comprehensive Plan A. Sewer plan/policy B. Transportation plan C. Land use plan (particularly the Highway 12 area) D. Park plan E. Surface water management plan F. Housing plan 2. Park plan and park dedication ordinance 3. 4. Goal setting for 1998 Highway 12 design (meeting with Orono's representatives on the Design Review Committee) The Council may want to schedule a set of work sessions to begin to address these issues, and to provide staff with direction for its work on these issues. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: MoUon to schedule work sessions to address key issues facing the city. wi* vt - ii i I ---------- —-------------------- ~~----------------------------------------------Ml «■ ■■■ iTam iiiHi* n u ■ ilB % REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION %■ DATE: January 9,1998 ITEM NO: /^' Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name Ron Moorse City Administrator's Title City Administrator Report Item Description: Annual Appointments > Resolution Each year the Council needs to make various appointments. Attached is a proposed resolution for Council consideration. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Resolution No.__designating selected appointment for the year 1998. f L A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING SELECTED APPOINTMENTS FOR THE YEAR 1998 by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota that theappointments and designations for the year 1998 are as follows: APPOINTMENT/DESIGNATiniV Acting Mayor Planning Commission Rep. to Council Representative to Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Legislative Liaison AMM AMM Legislative Contact Lead Attorney (Civil) City Attorney Firm (Civil) Alternate Attorney Lead Prosecuting Attorney City Prosecuting Attorney Firm Lead Consulting Engineer City Engineering Firm Auditor Fiscal Agents Insurance Agent of Record Weed Inspector Assistant Weed Inspector Transportation Committee Emergency Preparedness Director Southwest Sanitary Sewer District Suburban Health Nursing Service West Hennepin Recycling Commission im J. Diann Goetten Alternate Ronald J. Moorse Ronald J. Moorse J. Diann Goetten Tom Barrett Hinshaw & Culbertson William Soth, Dorsey & Whitney Kenneth N. Potts Kenneth N. Potts Glenn Cook Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates Malloy, Montague, Kamowski, Radosevich and Co., P.A. Ehlers & Associates Carl Bennetsen, R. L. Youngdahl & Assoc., Inc. Gabriel Jabbour Greg Gappa Greg Gappa Gary Cheswick Gary Cheswick Ronald J. Moorse Ronald J. Moorse Lin Vee r -.kJ» r- f A. ••J •8 i I APPOINTMENT/DESIGNATION Mayor's Association Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Suburban Rate Authority Westonka Senior Citizens Representative to Long Lake Fire Dept. Building Code Board of Appeals Hennepin Emergency Communications Organization North Tonka Crime Prevention Highway 12 Appointments: Policy Committee Technical Committee Citizens Conunittee Highway 12 Design Review Committee Housing and Redevelopment Authority Lake Minnetonka Cable Communication Commission im Gabriel Jabbour Lili McMillan Greg Gappa Ronald J. Moorse (Alternate) Gabriel Jabbour Charles Kelley Loren Kohnen, West Metro Services Tom Anderson, Hopkins Building Official Maureen Bellows, AlA Architect Kenneth Roelofs, Building contractor Vacant Position Ronald J. Moorse Gary Cheswick (Alternate) Gary Cheswick Barbara Peterson Gabriel Jabbour J. Diann Goetten (Alternate) Greg Gappa Gabriel Jabbour Charles Kelley George Johnson Eleanor Winston John Massopust (Alternate) Edward J. Callahan, Jr. J. Diann Goetten Jim Murphy Ron Moorse Gabriel Jabbour, Chair Charles M. Kelley, Secretary J. Diann Goetten Barbara Peterson Richard Flint Timothy Pattrin Gabriel Jabbour r APPOINTMENT/DESIGNATION Lake Use Committee Official Newspaper Community Development Committee Official Depositories/Investment Vendors 19^ J. Diann Goetten, Chair Charles Kelley Charles Schroeder The Laker and Pioneer Newspaper City Planner Senior Planning Coordinator Public Services Director First National Banks of: The Lakes (Navarre) Wayzata Firstar Bank of Minnesota League of MN Cities - 4M Fund Smith Barney, Mpls. Norw'est Investment Services, Inc., Mpls. FBS Investment Services, Inc. TCF Bank FSB Piper Jaffray, Mpls. Dain Bosworth, Inc., Mpls. Prudential Securities, Inc., Mpls. Paine Webber, Mpls. Merrill Lynch, Mpls. Ocwen Federal Bank, Fort Lee, NJ Provident Bank, Cincinnati, OH First State Bank of Excelsior, Shorewood, MN -;i Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held January 12, 1998. ATTEST:Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk 121697.1 iJL.1 h\ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION %/A ^ /q DATE: January 998 = ITEM NO; Department Approval: Name Dorothy Hallin Title City Clerk Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Selection of Date for 1998 Local Board of Review Meeting 1 ^3 • ^ Vi i The city recently received notification from the County Assessor that the city needs to select a date for the 1998 Local Board of Review meeting by January 23,1998. Wednesday, April 22,1998, at 7:00 p.m. has been suggested by the County Assessor. City Assessor Rolf Erickson has indicated this date is acceptable with him. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to establish April 22,1998 at 7:00 p.m. as the date and time for the 1998 Local Board of Review meeting. Memo llU}cUF««r M Dorothy M. Hallin, Orono City Clerk Thomas May, Hennepin County Assessor December 29,1997 1998 Local Board of Review Dates Wednesday Day of the Week April 22.1998 Date c \^ rt\ 9^0 Minnesota Law requires that I, as County Assessor, set the date for your Local Board of Review Meeting. After reviewing previous meeting days and your suggestions of last year, the above date was selected. I sincerely hope that it is agreeable with your council. As there must be a quorum, I would suggest that an informal review of your members with a request that they mark their calendars would be appropriate. Please confirm the date set out or call Bill Effertz at 348-3046 with your alternative date by January 23, so that our printing order can be completed on time. We suggest starting times of 6:30, 7:00 or 7:30 p.m., but will discuss it with you if you wish a different time. Your early completion and return of the attached tear off trip will be appreciated and we will send your official notice for posting as required by law. Please return to JoDee Nelson, A-2103 Government Center, Minneapolis, MN 55487 \l ■ CONFIRMATION Municipality: Date: Time: Place: For selecting meeting dates in future years, the following information will be helpful Department Approval: Name Dorothy Hallin Title City Clerk Administrator Reviewed:__m Agenda Section: City Administrator ’s Report Item Description: 1998 Fee Schedule Ordinance Amendment / r AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 166,2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 1998 FEE SCHEDULE The City Council of Orono ordains: Ordinance No. 166, 2nd Series adopted December 8, 1997, and entitled "An Ordinance Adopting the 1998 Fee Schedule" is amended to read: Application Type Efie 1, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Land Alteration: Grading, Filling, etc, (over +69 500 cubic yards) $250.00 + permit GRADING, EXCAVATION, FILLING fLAND ALTERATION! - 1 -+66 500 cubic yards (max. 10 loads) - +6+501 cubic yards S 50.00 (staff permit) + engineering fees if required ($100.00 if engineering fee necessary) $ 75.00 + Conditional Use Permit + $ 25.00 per each inspection over 1st NOTE: +6+ 501 cubic yards or more requires a Conditional use Permit unless approved as part of building permit. This ordinance becomes effective after its passage and publication. Passed by the Council I’lis 12th day of January, 1998. t. ATTEST:Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, City Cleric CO(/yv, REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE ITEM NO: ( ( ^998 Department Approval: Name Dorotliy Hallin Title City Clerk Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Special Assessment Deferral Renewal - Reapplication From Stubbs Bay Sanitary Sewer Project Resolution Attachment: A. Resolution No. 3894 B. Proposed Deferral Resolution Rose Madden, 350 Crestview Avenue, is applying for renewal of the Senior Citizen Deferral of the sanitary Sewer special assessment on her property. Mrs. Madden qualifies under the income and asset guidelines. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt Resolution #__approving the reapplication of special assessment deferment for Rose Madden. Ayes_, Nays_. -I CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 8 8 94_____ A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE PROGRAM FOR DEFERMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PERSONS 65 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono is the official governing body of the City of Orono; and WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statute Section 435.193 through Section 425.195 authorizes the City of Orono, upon proper application, to defer the payment of special assessments against any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older on January 1 of the payment year and for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments; and WHEREAS, Section 425.194 author' * 'S the municipality to establish an interest rate to be added to the deferred assessment which sh?*’ ^^ble in addition to tire deferred assessment; and that Orono had adopted such a program under Ordinance 2.62 (1984 recodified). Resolution 1093 (dated November 13, 1979), Resolution 1779 (dated June 10, 1985) and Resolution 2864 (dated August 27,1990). WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the deferral of assessments should be granted to any person otherwise qualified who makes proper application to the City of Orono on forms prescribed by the County Assessor of Hennepin County and by the Orono City Council and for whom the City Council determines that it would be a hardship to make the payments, based upon the following criteria: NUMBER OF PERSONS IN HOUSEHOLD ^UXIMUM INCOME 1 Person S29.100 2 Person S33.300 3 Person $37,450 4 Person $41,600 5 Person $44,950 6 Person $48,250 7 Person $51,600 8 Person $54,900 1 u f ' . CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ^g.0 4-------- Assets not including homesteaded property of $25,000, income and assets as defined in Hennepin County's Utility Connection Program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORONO IN A REGULAR MEETING ASSEMBLED, that the assessments against any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older and for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments, be deferred for a period of time not to exceed five years subject to the aforementioned financial criteria, upon submission of an appropriate application signed by the qualified person, and which may upon expiration of initial or any subsequent renewal deferments may be reapplied for, and subject to the applicant meeting all the necessary criteria upon reapplication be deferred for an additional period not to exceed 5 years; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the right of deferment is aut:;matically terminated under Section 435.195 if: 1. The owner dies and the spouse is not otherwise eligible; 2. The property or any part thereof is sold, transferred or subdivided; 3. The property should lose its homestead status; or 4. If for any reason the City determines that there would be no hardship to require immediate or partial payment. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held April 28,1997. ATTEST:Gabriel labour. Mayor \ Dorothy j|iin, City Clerk I t A RESOLUTION APPROVING A REAPPLICATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DEFERMENT FOR ROSE MADDEN WHEREAS, the City Council has ordered a local improvement project known as Stubbs B^y 1992 Sanitary Sewer Improvement for which special assessments have been levied against the benefitted properties; and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Resolutions No. 1093, Resolution No. 1779, Resolution No. 2864, Resolution No. 3175, and Resolution No. 3894 established a policy and procedure for deferring such special assessments for persons 65 years of age or older who have limited income and assets and for whom payment of such special assessment would constitute a financial hardship; and WHEREAS, Rose Madden has made reapplication for deferment of the above noted special assessment pursuant to the provisions of Resolution Numbers 1093,1779,2864,3175 and 3894, the original deferment was approved by the City Council on December 14, 1992. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby finds that the applicant has demonstrated a hardship consistent with the provisions of Resolution 3894, and hereby orders deferral of the payment for the levied special assessments as follows: APPLICANT: ADDRESS: Rose Mary Madden 350 Crestview Avenue LEVY NO. PROPERTY I D. NUMBER LEVIED AMOUNT AMOUNT DEFERRED 12544 05-117-23-14-0057 $8,840.00 $8,840.00 Deferral of payment for principal and interest shall be for a period of time not to exceed five (5) years with the first payment of principal and interest due in collection year 2002. Interest at the rate of 6.5% per annum shall be added to the deferred assessment. Deferred principal and interest shall be payable at the time of the tirst payment due in collection year 2002. The remainder of the principal and interest shall thereafter be payable in accordance with the adopted assessment roll. I. i f f ! ■■ ( ‘ ! This right of deferment is automatically terminated in collection year 2002 or upon the occurrence of any one or more of the following conditions, whichever may occur first: 1. The owner dies and the spouse is not otherwise eligible. 2. The property or any part thereof is sold, transferred, or subdivided; The property should lose its homestead status; or 4. If for any reason the City determines that there would be no hardship to require immediate or partial payment. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota on the 12th day of January, 1998. ATTEST:Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk If the applicant wishes to reapply at the end of this five (5) year deferment, the applicant must reapply to the City of Orono for deferment of special assessments in October 2001, to keep the assessment from being included with the real estate tax due and payable in 2002. Signature of Applicant Date ! ! fi!- t I REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: January 9, 1998 ITEM NO: / ^ SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT Filler Homes Steve Bohl Spring Parade of Homes Feb 28 - March 22, 1998 ® 480 Old Long Lake Road RESIDENTIAL KENNEL LICENSE Colleen Jabbour 985 Tonkawa Road I. Jacobs 1700 Shoreline Drive Willi Hoyer & H. Zohara 565 Hanlon Avenue Greg & Nancy Truchinski 1580 Fox Street COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve/deny the above listed licenses. Department Approval: Name Dorothy Hallin Dtie City Clerk Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Licenses Item Description: List of Licenses for Council Approval •• .qf/.- -.St r-VH*-•• »il ir.»j i> m JAN 1 2 J95J j ! 1 ■ W II BT^I iTf rr MHIm TO: FROM: DATE: Orono Police Department Dorothy Hallin, City Clerk December 29,1997 SUBJECT : Special Event Permit - Spring Parade of Homes Please review the attached application for a Spring Parade of Homes open house to be held at 480 Old Long Lake Road. This event will begin February 28 and run through March 22,1998. The hours will be; noon to 7:00 p.m., Thursdays through Sundays. This item will be on the January 12 Council agenda. Please make your comments in written form for Council's consideration. 1 Restrictions: 1. Parking will be allowed on east side of Old Long Lake Road (one side only) 2.No parking on west side of Old Long Lake Road from Wayzata Country Club to Wakefield Road. 3.West side of road must be posted vlth "police - No Parking", or a traffic control person directing traffic. r i PARADES & SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Permit.#: Fee: $50.00 Date Received: Phone Number: ^73 ( p;iVc^ BoName: Address:_____^ £ C^icLc S*/ . City, State, Zip: /_________________ Location of Parade or Event:*~{%0 Oldk C<»l^c • Oco oo . ff?S' -t-L C.cT Date of Event: Hours of Event: P«».^c^c^-e o ______________Type of Event: Insurance Company: Zt*^S »______Amount:______ (Copy of insurance certificate must be submitted with this application) I am aware of all applicable State and other laws regarding parades and special events and will abide by same. I also agree to hold the City of Orono harmless from all liabilities that may arise directly or indirectly from the parade of special event approved by the granting of this permit. I understand some events may require off-duty or reserve officers and a Approved: □ Remarks: Denied: □ By: 010399.3 ttrbiuj uu£r.-.> e«■I watiiih iweiiiiiii HibiBliiliWinTtrrTTnmiTrrffnnt-rmii**^ - r M Owner:£nlL KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Effective January 1,19^2_to December 31,19 n^ '1. 4.' J / J _ ^ i'sen TGhhouf -iiv-itmjoa. EsL , Dmno Mailing Address (if different): (include city and zip) Phone: (home) ^ ^ I (jtwvj (aJl/ fwork-y AnA-C)3l'^3. RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Fee: S25.00 (payment must accompany application) Maximum No. cf dogs to be kept at one time: -x (over 6 months of age) [oJp Purpose for more than 2 dogs: .0 {o ^SsixjT^ Dogs normally kept: ____insi^____^kennel structure COMMERCIAL Kennel License Fee: S150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business:__________________ /n5/ Business Activities: (example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.) Normal Business Hours: After Hours Contact: (name). (phone) Dog runs/exercise areas are: i ■ inside outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the undersigend hereby grants the City permisssion to inspect the premises prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any special conditions imposed by the City Council as part or any kennel license approval. For City Use Only Kennel inspected by Date / ^ Recommends Approval Y Denial In ! ‘i-p KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Effective January 1,19___to December 31,19 Owner: Property Address: Mailing Address (if different): Phone: (home) _______ '''____________-___________^___________________________________ (include city and zip) (work) RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Fee: S25.00 (payment must accompany application) Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time: ^ (over 6 months of age) Purpose for more than 2 dogs: Dogs normally kept: ____^inside kennel structure COMMERCIAL Kennel License Fee: S150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business: Business Activities: (example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.) Normal Business Hours: After Hours Contact: (name) (phone). Dog runs/exercise areas are:inside outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the undersigend hereby grants the City permisssion to inspect the premises prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any. special • * 1 t « *1 1 1 !• • Date For City Use Only Kennel inspected by ■ii ^ Recommends Approval Denial Daie - 9 7 ■ -T fc -ar rrri^- i r - - 4 f . !!|| lulr?: KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Effective January 1,19 to December 31, 19 38 iJAN 5 199S Owner: \a)\ //' Property Address: ^(e>^ flirs.n (include city and zip) ' Mailing Address (if different):. Phone: (horned ___________(work)_^Jf^if£ RESIDENTLAL Kennel License Fee: S25.00 (payment must accompany application) Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time:_3 (over 6 months of age) Principal Breed: r 5’V < A « Purpose for more than 2 dogs: />-€h Dogs normally kept: t^^inside / • kennel structure COMMERCIAL Kennel License Fee: S150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business;_________________ Business Activities:. (example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.) Normal Business Hours; After Hours Contact: (name). (phone) Dog runs/exercise areas are;inside outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the undersigend hereby grants the City pemusssion to inspect the premises prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements cf Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any . special conditions imposed by the City Council as part of any kennel license approval. U.-ylu. Applicant Date For City Use Only Kennel inspected by Date / ' y Recommends Approval Denial^ iwnmr—j-ia ^>nr i ini ii^i—Mia “-jniAiniiiiVnr mrir ir« it t i t~t~i~ bt i rm^i-~iT r -cit -tr- -^vm i-r-i-a.mi rj —i^wr iiAM.ir^iiiMtii ta ir.. it i'm-iiimh iiaiiTMain . KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Efifective January 1,19 to December 31.19*^ S Owner:a Property Address:15 So V «.c>c.u-3: >4 g> “X. Mailing Address (if different):_______ Phone: (home) -<^Iq3>\ (include city and zip)/0(.aa.S (work) RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Fee: S25.00 (payment must accompany application) Q.qe>^* » i Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time:___ (over 6 months of age) Principal Breed:_______^oc^W Purpose for more than 2 dogs:____ Dogs normally kept: ><anside____^kennel structure COMMERCIAL Kennel License Fee: S150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business: Business Activities: (example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.) Normal Business Hours: After Hours Contact: (name)_ (phone) Dog runs/exercise areas are:inside outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersig;.ed acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the undersigend hereby grants the City permisssion to inspect the premises prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any special conditions imposed by the City Council as part of any kennel license approval. Applic Date C*. For City Use Only Kennel inspected by____________ Recommends Approval \ Denial Date r C0(«,, •^Al^ J p ^ JS9B <^'n-c.-.. ■ ""•■’o.vo ♦ + , *» Jim ■lail.aaanMJkir* a*iiM-rLib-Mn^i4<^I f? i» m II ^1 ■ I ■! mt% lilllFi I'rt iB^lf ~i ITF' FTii ■■ «iI ■ r S Dec 1997 Frl 10:20 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 043651 043651 MOORSE, RONALD J. Totals Check Number 043651 Check Number 043652 043652 PBTBRSONe BARBARA A. Totals Check Number 043652 Check Number 043653 043653 FLINT, RICHARD Totals Check Number 043653 Cheek Number 043654 043654 GOETTEN, J. DIANN Totals Check Number 043654 Check Number 043655 043655 JABBOUR, GABRIEL B Totals Check Number 043655 Check Number 043656 043656 KELLEY, CHARLES Totals Check Number 043656 Grand Total Check Date oe-Dec-97 08-Dec-97 08-Dec-97 08-Dec-97 08-Dec-97 08-Dec-97 Page 1 Check Amount 184.70 184.70 269.36 269.36 269.36 269.36 269.36 269.36 323.22 323.22 269.36 269.36 1,585.36 a i 'A M'J, (T 18 Dec 1997 Thu 1:15 PM Check Number Check Register City of Orono Employee Nan»e Check Number 043658 043658 QEMAR, JAMIE L. Totals Check Number 043658 Check Number 043659 043659 HALLIN, DOROTHY M. Totals Check Number 043659 Check Number 043660 043660 HASBMAN, CAROLE A. Totals Check Number 043660 Check Number 043661 043661 NOORSB* RONALD J Totals Check Number 043661 Check Number 043662 043662 VBB, LINDA S Totals Check Number 043662 Check NUF^er 043663 043663 KUBKN. THOMAS M Totals Check Number 043663 Check Num^er 043664 043664 MILLER, CHRISTOPHER K. Tcials Check Number 043664 Check Number 043665 043665 OLSON, RONALD J Totals Check Number 043665 Check Number 043666 043666 ANDERSON, BRUCE L, Totals Check Number 043666 Check Date 17-Dec-97 17-DCC-97 17-Dec-97 17-Dec-97 17-Dec-97 17-Dec-97 17-Dec-97 17-Dec-97 17-Dec-97 Page 1 Check Amount 322.76 322.76 982.39 982.39 541.21 541.21 1,611.53 1,611.53 961.57 961.57 1,413.02 1,413.02 220.11 220.11 919.71 919.71 779.40 779.40 V. f E5- I r^jsm 4 ‘ 18 Dec 1997 Thu 1:15 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 043667 043667 BOBZIEN, SUE A. Totals Qieck Number 043667 Check Number 043668 043668 BORIS, SCOTT N. Totals Check Number 043668 Check Number 043669 043669 CHESWICK, GARY B Totals Check Number 043669 Check Number 043670 043670 CORNICK. JAMBS L. Totals Check Ntimber 043670 Cneck Number 043671 043671 DBMBOUSICI, JAY C Totals Check Number 043671 Check Number 043672 043672 ENGLISH III, IRVING H, Totals Check Number 043672 Check Number 043673 043673 ERICKSON. KURT R Totals Check Number 043673 Check Number 043674 043674 PARNIOK, CORREY L Totals Qieck Number 043674 Qieck Number 043675 043675 FISCHENICH. DAN T. Totals Check Number 043675 Check Number 043676 Check Date 17-Dec-97 17-Dec-97 17-Dec-97 17-Dec-97 17-Dec-97 17-Dec-97 17-Dec-97 17-Dec-97 17-Dec-97 Page 2 Check Amount 716.70 716.70 891.73 891.73 1.508.88 1.508.88 1.434.82 1.434.62 1.366.62 1.366.62 68.01 68.01 1.156.21 1.156.21 950.10 950.10 1.275.42 1.275.42 : 1 i ‘ I I ^ I r 18 D«C 1997 Thu 1:15 PM Check Register City of Orono 1" Checlc Number Employee Name Check Number 043676 i 043676 HANSING. CAROL J. i Totals Check Number 043676 Check Number 043677 n 043677 JOHNSON. BRADLEY P Totals Check Number 043677 Check Number 043678 043678 KNOLLENBBRG, KRISTIN L, Totals Check Number 043678 Check NuodMr 043679 043679 MCN'iLLY, STEVEN A. Totals Check Number 043679 Check Number 043680 043680 MCNICHOLS, DAVID L. Totals Check Number 043680 Check Nun0>er 043681 043681 MOROWCZYNSKI. JAMES Totals Check Number 043681 Check Number 043682 043682 PERSELL. NILLIAM R Totals Check Number 043682 Check Number 043683 043683 SCHOENHOFP, JOHN B. Totals Check Number 043683 Check Nus^r 043684 043684 THOMTON, MARK R Totals Check Number 043684 Check Number 043685 Check Date 17-Dec-97 17-Dec-9? 17-Dec-97 ‘l7-Dec-97 17-Dec-97 17-Dec-97 17-Dec-97 17-Dec-97 17-Dec-97 Page 3 Check Amount 430.70 430.70 1,26j.43 1,263.43 691.54 691.54 463.85 463.85 535.31 535.31 1.559.53 1.559.53 399.09 399.09 1.179.99 1.179.99 956.93 956.93 • i I r » I r: . t 18 Dec 1997 Thu 1:15 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 043685 043685 TOMCHECK, LAWRENCE F Totals Check Number 043685 Check Number 043686 043686 T0MCZYK« MARK H. Totals Check Number 043686 Check Number 043687 043687 FISCHER, CHRISTOPHER K. Totals Check Number 043687 Check Number 043688 043688 WITTKB, ANTHONY A. Totals Check Number 043688 Check Number 043689 043689 DRESSLBR, BRADLEY J, Totals Check Number 043689 C^ieck Number 043690 043690 OAFFRON, MICHAEL P. Totals Check Number 043690 Che'dc Number 043691 043691 GAPPA, GREGORY A. Tocals Check Number 043691 Qieck Number 043692 043692 OMAN, LYLE E Totals Check Number 043692 Check Number 043693 043693 VAN Z •..ll.ClJIv'. ELIZABETH Totals Check Number 043693 Check Number 043694 Check Date 17-Dec-97 17-Dec-97 17-DCC-97 17-Dec-97 17-Dec-97 17-DCC-97 17-Dec-97 l7-Dec-97 17-Dec-97 Page 4 Check Amount 278.54 278.54 1,327.71 1,327.71 133.93 133.93 205.66 205.66 239.94 239.94 1,095.41 1,095.41 1,555.67 1,555.67 1,165.01 1,165.01 1,174.29 1,174.29 I . M ) iVftllUUMlIMinaJl j t I 1^ Iv , « 18 Dec 1997 Thu 1:15 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name dieck Number 043694 043694 VANG« BRUCE L. Totals Check Number 043694 Check Number 043695 043695 ffECXMAN« STEPHEN J. Totals Check Number 043695 Check Nunuer 043696 043696 LRINfCHAUS, JOHN P Totals Check Numbet i343C96 Check Number 043697 043697 DBBAERE, DONALD L Totals Check Number 043697 Check Number 043698 043698 GREGORY, JAMES D. Totals Check Number 043696 Check Number 043699 043699 HANSEN. STEVEN C, Totals Check Number 043699 Check Number 043700 043700 OBERAIGNER, SCOTT G. Totals Check Number 043700 Check Number 043701 043701 OBRIEN. RANDY L Totals Check Number 043701 Check Number 043702 043702 PALMER. GREGORY A. Totals Check Number 043702 Check Number 043703 Check Date 17-Dec-97 17-Dec-97 17-Dec-97 17-Dec-97 17-Dec-97 17-Dec-97 17-Dec-97 17.Dec-97 17.Dec-97 Page 5 Check Amount 1.030.83 1.030.83 22.85 22.85 1.038.53 1.038.53 775.79 775.79 721.61 721.61 905.98 905.98 732.72 732.72 292.91 292.91 684.65 684.65 1 « 18 Dec 1997 Thu 1:15 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 6 Check Number En^loyee Name Check Date Check Amount Check Number 043703 043703 R^MraUN, BARRY J. 17-Dec-97 Totals Check Number 043703 813.55 813.55 Check Nhfflber 043704 043704 SKR£SN« DALE S.17-Dec-97 Totals Check Number 043704 Check Number 043705 657.34 657.34 043705 STSPPENHAGEN, RONALD B. Cheek NUiaber 04370s 17-Dec-97 1.119.75 1.119.75 Qrend Total 40,573,23 ' I li ; i i all r I 31 Dec 1997 Hcd 11:37 AH Check Humber Check Register City of Orono Employee Kame Check Number 043708 043700 MILLER, CHRISTOPHER K. Totals Check Number 043708 Check Number O437S0 043758 GEMAR, JAMIE L. Totals Check Number 043758 Check Number 043759 043759 HALLZN, DOROTHY M. Totals Check Number 043759 Check Number 043760 043760 HASEMAN, CAROLE A. Totals Check Number 043760 Check Number 043761 043761 MOORSB, RONALD J. Totals Check Number 043761 Check Number 043762 043762 VRE, LINDA S Totals Check Number 043762 Cheek Number 043763 043763 KUEHN, THOMAS M. Totals Check Number 043763 Check Number 043764 043764 OLSON, RONALD J. Totals Check Number 043764 Check Number 043765 043765 ANDERSON, BRUCE L Totals Check Number 043765 Check Date 10-Dec-97 3l-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-DCC-97 Page 1 Check Amount 2,077.45 2,077.45 429.16 429.16 982.39 982.39 541.21 541.21 1,786.20 1,786.20 961.57 961.57 1,413.02 1,413.02 696.12 896.12 730.28 730.28 , ^ I ft* 1^’ 31 Dec 1997 Hed 11:37 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 043766 043766 BOBZIEN, SUE A. Totals Check Number 043766 Cneck Number 043767 043767 BORIS, SCOTT W, Totals Check Number 013767 Check Number 043768 043768 CHBSWICK, GARY B Totals Check Number 043768 Check Number 043769 043769 CORKICK, JAMES L. Totals Check Number 043769 Check Number 043770 043770 DEMBOUSKI, JAY C. Totals Check Number 043770 Check Number 043771 043771 ENGLISH III, IRVING H. Totals Check Number 043771 Check Number 043772 043772 ERICKSON, KURT R Totals Check Number 043772 Check Number 043773 043773 PARNIOK, CORREY L. Totals Check Number 043773 Check Number 043774 043774 FISCHENICH, DAN T, Totals Check Number 043774 Check Number 043775 Check Date 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 Page 2 Check Amount 716.70 716.70 921.17 921.17 1,508.88 1,508.88 1,346.54 1,346.54 1,510.02 1,510.02 68.01 68.01 1,156.21 1,156.21 1,106.10 1,106.10 1,176.12 1,176.12 ■im i~^s~STTMi TWianm~~i^i n a i 11 r 3X Dec 1997 Hed 11:37 AN Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Qieck Number 043775 043775 HAKSING. CAROL J. Totals Check Number 043775 Check Number 043776 043776 JOHNSON, BRADLEY P. Totals Check Number 043776 Check Number 043777 043777 KNOLLBNBBRG, KRISTIN L. Totals Check Number 043777 Check Number 043778 043778 OiLY, STEVSI A. Totals Check irumber 043778 Check Number 043779 043779 MCNICHOLS, DAVID L. Totals Check Number 043779 Check Number 043780 I 043780 MOROlfCZYNSKI. JAMBS Totals Check Number 043780 Check Number 043781 043781 PBRSELL, WILLIAM R Totals Check Number 043781 Check Number 043782 043782 SCHOENHOFF, JOHN B. Totals Check Numbei 043782 ^eck Number 043783 043783 THOKiOh, R. Totals Check Number 043783 Check Number 043784 Check Date 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 3l-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 Page 3 Check Amount 507.80 507.80 1,263.43 1,263.43 €91.54 691.54 370.28 370.28 608.89 608.89 1,559.53 1,559.53 342.04 342.04 1,322.80 1,322.80 1,007.83 1,007.83 'M ■f : I iiMinHg ■ifiMiii I III! iirTii !■< tfHi i~iM iiwiia ' i> i ii i ^ ■ ,i ' fW, ■! i»i Mi »i ■ i m iwi it H'« M _ .1.11 u.u^i.^ArA^ft'SirL . r il Dec 1997 ed 11:37 AM Check Number Check Register City of Orono Employee Name aeck Number 043784 043784 TOMCHECK, LAWRENCE F Totals Check Number 043784 Check Number 043785 043785 tomczy::, mark w. Totals Check Number 043785 Check Number 043786 043786 FISCHER, CHRISTOPHER K. Totals Check Number 043786 Check Number 043787 043787 I7ITTKE, ANTHONY A. Totals Check Number 043787 Check Number 043788 043788 BRESSLER, BRADLEY J. Totals Check Number 043788 Check Number 043789 043789 QAFFRON, MICHAEL P Totals Check Number 043789 Check Number 043790 043790 QAPPA, GREGORY A. Totals Qieck Number 043790 Caeck Number 043791 043791 OMAN. LYLE E. Totals Check Number 043791 ^.eck Number 043792 043792 VAN ZOISREN, ELIZABETH Totals Check Number 04i792 <:heck Number 043793 Check Date 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 Page 4 Check Amount 332.85 332.85 1,327.71 1,327.71 72.20 72.20 286.29 286.29 222.82 222.82 1,095.41 1,095.41 1,702.:3 1,702.43 1,165.01 1,165.01 1,270.09 1,270.09 r 1 ; 31 Dec 1997 Wed 11:37 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Hunber Employee Name Check Number 043793 043793 VANG« BRUCE L. Totals Check Number 043793 Check Number 043794 043794 HECKMAN, STEPHEN J. Totals Check Number 043794 Check Number 043795 043795 BRINKHAUS, JOHN F % Totals Check Number 043795 Check Number 043796 043796 DEBABRB, DONALD L. Totals Check Number ''tl'^96 Check Number 043797 043797 GREGORY, JAMES D. Totals Check Number 043797 Check Number 043796 043798 HANSEN, STEVQf C. Totals Check Number 043798 Check Number 043799 043799 OBBRAIGNBR, SCOTT G. Totals Check Number 043799 Check Number 043800 043800 OBRIEN, RANDY L Totals Check Number 043800 Check Number 043801 043801 PALMER, GREGORY A. Totals Check Number 043801 Check Number 0^3803 Check Date 31-Dec-97 31-DCC-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 31-Dec-97 Page 5 Check Amount 1,030.83 1,030.83 22.85 22.85 1,038.53 1,038.53 921.65 921.65 798.21 798.21 755.90 755.90 732.72 732.72 171.76 171.76 925.25 925.25 f ii i \ ‘ i i ► 1 i 31 D«c 1997 Ned lli37 AM Check Register City of Orono Page 6 Check Number Employee Name Check Date Check Amount Check Number 043802 043802 RATHBUN« BhRRX J.31-Dec-97 Totals Check Number 043802 852.16 852.16 Check Number 043803 043803 SXRBBN, DALE S.31-Dec-97 Totals Check Number 043803 657.34 657.34 Check Number 043804 043804 STEPPBNHAGEN, RONALD E 31-Dec-97 Totals Check Number 043804 1,119.75 1,119.75 Qiech Nundber 043606 043806 THONKEI, NARK R.31-Dec-97 Totals Check Number 043806 174.50 174.50 Grand Total 43,677.55 '¥ <* . ..rf? ‘ i t- Check Register City of Orono Page 1 Name 54326 POSTMASTER 02-Jan-98 POSTMASTER Totals Check Number 54326 POSTMASTER Check Number 54327 COUNTRY CAKE CUPBOARD 54327 02-Jan-90 COUNTRY CAKE CUPBOARD Totals Check Number 54327 COUNTRY CAKE CUPBOARD Check Number 54328 JUBILEE FOODS 54328 02-Jan-98 JUBILEE FOODS % Totals Check Number 54328 JUBILEE FOODS V .ck Number 54329 RED'S CAFE 54329 02-Jan-98 RED'S CAFE Totals Check Number 54329 RED'S CAFE Check Number 54330 AMERICAN MEDICAL SECURITY Transaction Amount 900.00 900.00 Consents POSTAGE FOR METER 12.50 12.50 HENN EMERG PREPAREDNESS 37.00 37.00 CAKE FOR C. MILLER 230.04 230.04 HOLIDAY LUNCHEON 39.89 DECEMBER DENTAL 15.74 DECEMBER DENTAL 61.95 DECEMBER DENTAL 31.48 DECEMBER DENTAL 15.70 DECEMBER DENTAL 386.24 DECEMBER DENTAL 15.00 DECEMBER DENTAL 566.00 ENDORSEMENTS 1997 GENERAL LAND USE GENERAL LAND USE LAKES 3,146.08 PICA & MEDICARE W/H LAKES 3,202.24 FICA,MEDCR CITY SHARE LAKES 7,955.53 FEDERAL WITHHOLDING LAKES 14,303.85 29.B9 il74 REPLACE LIGHT 29.69 «176 DIAGNOSTICS 31.89 #174 OIL CHANGE Qieck Humber 55235 G &K SERVICES 55235 22-Dec-97 G & 55235 22-Dec-97 G & 55235 22-Dec-97 G & 55235 22-Dec-97 G 6 55235 22-Dec-97 G k : 55235 22-Dec-97 G k \ 55235 22-Dec-97 G k 1 55235 22-Dec-97 G k 1 55235 22-Dec-97 G k 1 55235 22-Dec-97 G ft 1 55235 22-Dec-97 G k 1 55235 22-Dec-97 G k 1 55235 22-Dec-97 G k 1 rtT-s»:»x.Si:4: 18 Dec 1997 T'.u 1:03 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 55265 RC IDENTIFICATIONS Totals Check Number 55265 RC IDENTIFICATIONS Check Number 5S266 RIT2 CAMERA 55266 55266 22-Dec-97 22-DCC-97 RIT2 CAMERA RITZ CAMERA Totals Check Number 55266 RITZ CAMERA Check Number SS267 ROLLINS OIL CO. 55267 22-Dec-97 ROLLINS OIL CO. Totele Check Number 5S267 ROLLINS OIL CO. Check Number S52fi8 SNYDER DRUG STORES SS268 55268 22-Dec-97 22-Dec-97 SNYDER DRUG STORES SNYDER DRUG STORES Totele Check Number 55268 SNYDER DRUG STORES Check Number 55269 SPRINT PCS 55269 22-Dec-97 SPRINT PCS Totals Check Number 55269 sprint pcs Check Number 55270 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC. 55270 22-Dec-97 SRP CONSULTING GROUP INC, Totals Check Number 55270 SRP CONSULTING GROUP INC. Check Number 55271 STAR TRIBUNE 55271 23-Jan-97 STAR TRIBUNE Totals Check Number 55271 STAR TRIBUNE Check Number 55272 STBPPENHAOBN, RON 55272 19-Dec-96 STEFFENHAGEN, RON Totals Check Number 55272 steffenhagen, ron Check Number 55273 STREICHERS 55273 55273 55273 22-Dec-97 22-Dec-97 22-Dec-97 STREICHERS STREICHERS STREICHERS Transaction Amount 3.73 10.64 6.50 17.14 447.96 447.96 9.35 12.82 22.17 28.50 28.50 132.83 132.83 319.95 319.95 34.69 34.69 35.24 26.57 31.95 Page 7 Comments FILM PROCESSING fii/! processing OIL, GREASE FILM MISC SUPPLIES REPUI^ ANTENNA APPLICATIO HWY 12 STUDY AD FOR POSITION WjCSA conf reimbursement ROTARY SWITCH MISC PARTS TRAINING AMMO , ..rr^tinMiAeMrArt^i.'Vki r.^rr^.: :9 Dec 1997 :hu 1:03 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Humber Date Name :heck Number 55273 55273 55273 STREICHERS 22-Dec-97 STREICHERS 22-Dec-97 STREICHERS Totals Check Number 55273 STREICHERS .*heck Number 55274 SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERV. INC. 55274 55274 22-Dec-97 22-Dec-97 SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERV. INC. SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERV. INC. Totals Check Number 55274 SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERV. INC .Tieck Number 55275 THRALL DIST. * 55275 22-Dec-97 THRALL DIST. Totals Check Number 55275 THRALL DIST. heck Number 55276 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 55276 22-Dec-97 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED Totals Check Number 55276 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED rheck Number S5277 US NEST COMMUNICATIONS 55277 55277 55277 2:-:«c-97 s;-r-jc-97 :2-Dec-97 US HEST COimJNICATIONS US NEST CO^t1UNICATIONS US NEST COMMUNICATIONS Totals Check Nunber 55277 US NEST CCM1UN1CATIONS Check Number 55278 VILLAGE CHEVROLET 55278 22-Dec-97 VILLAGE CHEVROLET Totals Check Number 55278 VILLAGE CHEVROLET Check Number 55279 N.N. GRAINGER INC. 55279 55279 22-Dec-97 22-Dec-97 N.N. GRAINGER INC. N.N. GRAINGER INC. Totals Check Number 55279 N.N. GRAINGER INC. '^eck Number 55280 NARNING LITES OF MN 55280 22-Dec-97 NARNING LITES OF MN Totals Check Number 55280 NARNING LITES OF MN Zhmck Number 55281 NBSTSIDB NHOLESALE TIRE 55281 22-Dec-97 NESTSIDB NHOLESALE TIRE • , Transaction Amount 132.91 7.40 234.07 35.00 950.50 985.50 519.72 519.72 638.07 638.07 39.35 45.94 88.75 174.04 46.97 46.97 280.80 154.90 435.70 105.44 105.44 10.00 Page 8 Comments MISC UNIFORMS BADGE HOLDER REFUND-930 DAKOTA AVE REFUND-930 DAKOTA AVE GUIDE RAIL PIPES MISC UNIFORMS US NEST CHARGES US NEST CHARGES US HEST CHARGES 8425 SPEED METER ADAPTOR SUPPLIES FOR FUEL ISLAND BRUSH. NHEEL BARRICADE RENTAL 8708 TIRE REPAIR iriTii-n -n i i I • 4 18 Dec 1997 Thu 1:03 PM Check Register City of Oronc Page 9 Check Number Date Name Transaction Amount Comments Check Number 55281 55281 HESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE 22-Dec-97 WESTSIDB WHOLESALE TIRE Totals Check Niunber 55281 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE check Number 55282 YOCUM OIL CO INC. 55282 22-Dec-97 YOCUM OIL CO INC. Totals Check Number 55282 YOCUM OIL CO INC. 51.26 61.26 MOUNT SPARE TIRES 172.23 172.23 HEATING OIL Grand Total 41,713.97 ft r i.AajUV»v < LAKES 3,079.25 PICA k MEDICARE tf/H LAKES 3,079.25 PICA,MBDCR CITY SHARE LAKES 8,665.12 FEDERAL fflTHHOLDINQ LAKES 14,823.62 39.89 DECEMBER DENTAL 15.74 DECEMBER DENTAL 61.95 DECEMBER DENTAL 31.48 DECEMBER DENTAL 15.70 DECEMBER DENTAL 386.24 DECEMBER DENTAL 15.00 DECEMBER DENTAL 566.00 ii- i 8 Jan 1998 Thu 7:09 PM Check Check Register City of Orono Chack Number 55302 CITYVIBW PLOMBIHO k HEATING 55302 07-Jan-98 CITYVIEH PLOMBING k HEATING Totele Check Number 55302 CITYVIEH PLUMBING k HEATING Check Number 55303 ELECTRIC SERVICE CO. 55303 07-Jen-98 ELECTRIC SERVICE CO. Totals Check Number 55303 ELECTRIC service co. Transaction Number Date Name Amount Check Number 55297 AT & T -TAMPA 55297 08-Jan-98 AT a T -TAMPA 2.37 Totals Check Number 55297 AT a T -TAMPA 2.37 Check Number 55298 AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES 55298 08-Jan-98 AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES -14.09 55298 08-Sep-97 AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES 5.49 55298 08-Sep-97 AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES 5.50 55298 08-Sep-97 AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES 118.85 Totals Check Number 55298 AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES 115.75 Check Number % 55299 AT8T 55299 08-Jan-98 ATaT 52.96 Totals Check Number 55299 ATaT 52.96 Check Number 55300 BONBSTROO ROSENE a ASSOC. 55300 08-Jan-98 BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC.103.50 55300 08-Jan-98 BONBSTROO ROSENE a ASSOC.2,202.75 55300 08-Jan-98 BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC.1,931.50 55300 08-Jan-98 BONESTROO ROSENE « ASSOC.2,675.50 55300 08-Jan-98 BONBSTROO ROSENE a ASSOC.6,627.23 55300 08-Jan-98 BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC.7,058.57 55300 08-Jan-98 BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC.660.66 55300 08-Jan-98 BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC.66.44 55300 08-Jan-98 BONBSTROO ROSENE a ASSOC.27.50 553Q0 08-Jan-98 BONBSTROO ROSENE a ASSOC.1,551.56 Totals Check Number 55300 BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC.22,905.21 Check Number SS301 BUDGET PRINTING 55301 22-Dec-97 BUDGET PRINTING 2.00 Totals Check Number 55301 BUDGET PRINTING 2.00 Page 1 Consents V30-612-010-2207-0-9 GERKARDSON CELL PHONE CHARGES CELL PHONE CHARGES CELL PHONE CHARGES 016 343-9873 001 INSPECTIONS - SEPT WETLAND INVENTORY #1 WELL 82 ADMIN OCT BYRDGE/BRKT RFP 82,3 BYRDGE/BRK ADDL OCT NLL/LLCC INS OCT NLL/LLCC T OCB RD TRAIL INSP OCT ATTEND MSA MTG OCTOBER COUNCIL MINUTES 1998 BUDGET DOCUMENT CHANGE FILTERS CH i^IREN SERVICE CALL W \ rnsm hu 7:09 PM Check Nuinber Date Name !heck Number 55304 G &K SERVICES 55304 07-Jan-98 G k ; 55304 07-Jan-98 G & 1 55304 07-Jan-98 G 6 1 55304 07-Jan-98 G & 1 55304 07-Jan-98 G k 1 55321 07-Jan-98 NALOOR POMP 55321 07-Jan-98 NALDOR PUMP 55321 07-Jan-98 NALDOR PUMP Totals Check Number S5321 HALDOR PUMP r CENTER 1,000.00 r CENTER 1,000.00 BRAD 31.62 BRAD 31.62 8 Jan 1998 Thu 7:09 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 55344 55344 55344 55344 HINSHAH & CULBERTSON 08-Jan-98 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 08-Jan-98 HINSHAW & a^LBERTSON 08-Jan-98 HINSHAW & CULBERTSON Totals Check Number 55344 HINSHAW & CULBERTSON Check Number 55345 ICMA DISTRIBUTION CENTER 55345 08-Jan-98 ICMA DISTRIBUTION CENTER Totals Check Number 55345 ICMA DISTRIBUTION CENTER Check Number 55346 INT'L ASSN OP CHIEFS OF POLICE 55346 08-Jan-98 INT'L ASSN OP CHIEFS OP POLICE Totals Check Number 55346 INT'L ASSN OF CHIEFS OF POLICE Check Number 55347 J H LARSON ELECTRICAL CO. 55347 08-Jan-98 J H LARSON ELECTRICAL CO. Totals Check Number 55347 J H LARSON ELECTRICAL CO. Check Number 55348 JOHNSON* BRAD 55348 5S348 08-Jan-98 08-Jan-96 JOHNSON* BRAD JOHNSON* BRAD Totals Check Number 55348 JOHNSON* BRAD Check Number 55349 KOEHNEN'S AMOCO 55349 07-Jan-98 KOEHNEN'S AMOCO Totals Check Number 55349 KOCHNEN'S AMOCO Check Number 55350 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC 55350 08-Jan-98 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC Totals Check Number 55350 KUSTOM SIQIALS INC Check Number 55351 LAKE COUNTRY CHAPTER 55351 08-Jan-98 LAKE COUNTRY CHAPTER Totals Check Number 55351 UJCB COUNTRY chapter Check Number 55352 LAPEYRB STAIR 55352 08-Jan-98 LAPEYRE STAIR Totals Check Number 55352 LAPEYRE STAIR Transaction Amount 34.00 848 oc 5*395.64 6*896.18 103.35 103.35 100.00 100.00 191.59 191.59 60.00 249.90 309.90 20.18 20.18 1*610.28 1*610.28 40.00 40.00 1*496.00 1*496.00 Page 7 Comments CLd RD TRAIL EASMNT GENERAL LEGAL AUG LAND USE APPLICATTCi^d PERIODICALS/MANUALS MEMBERSHIP CHESWICK LIGHT BULBS UNIFORM SHOES UNIFORMS HEADLIGHT MISC EQUIPMENT MEMBERSHIP - OMAN*VANG FUEL ISLAND STAIR ■rrum.ir*^ a Jan 1998 Thu 7:09 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 55353 55353 LONG LAKE CHAMBER OF CO^MERCE 08-Jan-98 LONG LAKE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Totals Check Number 55353 LONG LAKE CHAMBER OP COFMERCE Check Number 55354 MEDICA CHOICE 55354 55354 08-Jan-98 08-Jan-98 MEDICA CHOICE MEDICA CHOICE Totals Check Nuinber 55354 MEDICA CHOICE rheck Number 55355 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS 55355 08-Jan-98 MET COUNCIL ENVIR TAL SVCS Totals Check Number 55355 MET COUNCIL ENVIR TAL SVCS Check Number 55356 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER 55356 08-Jan-98 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER Totals Check Number 55356 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER Check Number 55357 MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION 55357 08-Jan-98 MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION Totals Check Nuniber 55357 MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION Check Number 55358 MN DEPT OF AGRICULTURE 55358 08-Jan-98 MN DEPT OP AGRICULTURE Totals Check Number 55358 MN DEPT OF AGRICULTURE Check Number 55359 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 55359 08-Jar 98 MN DEPT OF HEALTH Totals Check Number 55359 MN DEPT OF HEALTH Check Number 55360 MN GOVT PIN. OFFICER'S ASSN 55360 08-Jan-98 MN GOVT FIN. OFFICER'S ASSN Totals Check Number 55360 MN GOVT FIN. OFFICER'S ASSN Check Number 55361 MN POLLUTION CCHITROL AGENCY 55361 55361 08-Jan-98 08-Jan-98 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGOtCY MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ■■Wn . Transaction Amount 50.00 50.00 202.25 10,399.84 10,602.09 22,378.66 22,378.66 14,107.50 14,107.50 74.32 74.32 10.00 10.00 1,126.00 1,126.00 60.00 60.00 150.00 150.00 Page 8 Comments MEMBERSHIP - PD JANUARY HEALTH JANUARY HEALTH SEWER SAC CHARGES BORIS PESTICIDE APPLICAT LIC WATER TEST FEE DUES KUQIN OPERATORS SEMINAR OPERATORS SEMINAR 8 Jan 1998 Thu 7:09 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 55361 55361 55361 55361 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 08-Jan-98 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 08-Jan-98 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 08-Jan-98 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Totals Check Number 55361 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Check Number 55362 NSP 55362 55362 07-Jan-98 07-Jan-98 NSP NSP Totals Check Number 55362 NSP Check Number* 55363 55363 0PM INFORMATION SYSTEMS 08-Jan-98 0PM INFORMATION SYSTEMS Totals Check Number 55363 0PM INFORMATION SYSTEMS Check Number 55364 PIONEER 55364 55364 55364 55364 55364 08-Jan-98 08-Jan-98 08-Jan-98 08-Jan-98 08-Jan-98 PIONEER PIONEER PIONEER PIONEER PIONEER Totals Check Number 55364 PIONEER Check Number 55365 POHERCLEAN COMPANY INC 55365 08-Jan-98 POHERCLEAN COMPANY INC. Totals Check Number 55365 POHERCLEAN COMPANY INC. Check Number 55366 POMP A METER SERVICES INC. 55366 08-Jan-98 PUMP k METER SERVICES INC. Totals Check Number 55366 P^ k METER SERVICES INC. Check Number 55367 REED VENDING 55367 08-Jan-98 REED VENDING Totals Check Number 55367 REED VENDING Check Number 55368 RINKE-NOONAN 55368 08-Jan-98 RINKE-NOONAN Totals Check Number 55368 RINKE-NOONAN Transaction Amount 150.00 150.00 150.00 750.00 101.57 82.30 183.87 1,050.00 1,050.00 316.75 105.00 36.75 439.25 17.50 915.25 1,747.72 1,747.72 103.70 103.70 187.10 187.10 70.00 70.00 Page 9 Comments OPERATORS SEMINAR OPERATORS SEMINAR OPERATORS SEMINAR MAINT - LASER PRINTER OFFICIAL SU»MARY il66 ZONING ORD 169 ORD AMENDMENT - ALARMS ORDINANCE 164 FERNDALB RECONSTRUCTION DECEMBER 1997 FILTER CHANGE CONSSECION ITEMS HETLAND CONFERENCE ■ fc. 6 Jan 1998 Thu 7:09 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 55369 55369 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES 00.Jan-98 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES Total. Check Number S5369 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES Check Number 55370 SENSIBLE LAND USB COALITION 55370 08.Jan-98 SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION Total. Check Number 5S370 sensible land use COALITION 55371 SBRCO LABORATORIESCheck Number 55371 O8-Jan-90 SERCO LABORATORIES % Totals Check Number 55371 SERCO LABORATORIES :‘.«ck Number 55372 STAR TRIBUOT 55372 08-Jan-98 STAR TRIBUNE Totals Check Number 55372 STAR TRIBUNE Check Number 55373 STRBICHERS 55373 07-Jan-98 STREICHHIS Totals Check Number 55373 STRBICHERS **heck Number 55374 TEMPORARIES-TO-00 55374 O0-Jan-98 TEMPORARIES-TO-GO Totals Check Number 55374 TEMPORARIES-TO-GO Tieck Number 55375 THE HOME DEPOT 55375 08-Jan-98 THE HOME DEPOT Totals Check Number 55375 THE HOME DEPOT Check Number 55376 UNIV OF MINNESOTA 55376 O0-Jan-98 UNIV OF MINNESOTA Totals Check Number 55376 UNIV OP MINNESOTA neck Number 55377 UNIVERSITY OP MINNESOTA 55377 08-Jan-98 UNIVERSITY OP MINNESOTA Totals Check Number 55377 university op Minnesota •"heck Number 55378 VAN ZOMER£N« ELIZABETH Transaction Amount 6.783.56 6.783.56 25.00 25.00 270.00 270.00 414.75 414.75 52.40 52.40 44.00 44.00 122.37 122.37 225.00 225.00 175.00 175.00 Page 10 Comments ASSESSING FEE VAN ZOMERAN TESTING NAVARRE WTP ASSIS FINANCE DIR/MIS GUN BELT HOLIDAY LUNCHEON GRINDER BUILDING OFF INSTITUTE SCHOENHOFF-MN JUV OFFICER I1 t ; 8 Jan 1998 Thu 7:09 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 55378 55378 55378 55378 VAN ZOMEREN, ELIZABETH 08-Jan-98 VAN ZOMEREN, ELIZABETH 08-Jan-98 VAN ZOMEREN, ELIZABETH 08-Jan-98 VAN ZOMEREN, ELIZABETH Totals Check Number 55378 VAN ZOMEREN, ELIZABETH Check Number 55379 VEE, LIN 55379 08-Jan-98 VEE, LIN Totals Check Number 55379 VEE, LIN Check Number 55380 VIKING SAFETY BQOIPMENT 55380 08-Jan-98 VIKING SAFETY EQUIPMENT Totals Check Number 55380 VIKING SAFETY EQUIPMENT Check Number 55381 NARNING LITES OF MN 55381 08-Jan-98 WARNING LITES OF MN Totals Check Number 55381 WARNING LITES OF MN Check Number SS382 WEST HENNEPIN PUBLIC SAFETY 55382 08-Jan-96 WEST HENNEPIN PUBLIC SAFETY Totals Check Number 55382 WEST HENNEPIN PUBLIC SAFETY Check Number 55383 mesTONKA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 55383 08-Jan-98 WESTONKA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Totals Check Number 55383 WESTONKA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Check Number 55384 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT 55384 08-Jan-98 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT Totals Check Number 55384 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT Check Number 55385 YOCUM OIL CO INC. 55385 08-Jan-98 YOCUM OIL CO INC. Totals Check Number 55385 YOCUM OIL CO INC. Transaction Amount 64.28 9.60 38.30 112.18 9.30 9.30 109.56 109.58 87.74 87.74 77.00 77.00 117.00 117.00 254.36 254.36 1,186.77 1,186.77 562,700.56 Page 11 Comments PC WORK SESSION MILEAGE MISC SUPPLIES ACCESS CLASS REBAR ASSEMBLY REFLECTIVE VESTS LUNCHES/COPS TRAINING MEMBERSHIP CALIBRATE PUMPS DIESEL FUEL i I '1 k 1 o I ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 17,1997 ' t t?' ROLL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present; Chair Dale Lindquist, Janice Berg, Elizabeth Hawn, William Stoddard, and Lili McMillan. Charles Schroeder and Sandra Smith were absent. The following represented the City Staff: Public Services Director Greg Gappa, City Planner Elizabeth Van Zomeren, Planmng Intern Brad Bressler and Recorder Sherry Frost. Mayor Jabbour present. Chair Lindquist called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m. was DISCUSSION ITEMS (#1) NAVARRE HOUSING STUDY - BRAD BRESSLER Bressler reported that the Navarre Housing Study was conducted in two phases, one being a mailed out survey to the residents and the other a field survey conducted by Bressler. piere are four sub-areas. The purpose of the study was to see if there was any interest in housing rehabilitation and grant funding. Bressler reviewed the tables included in the information regarding home ownership, income groups, age and family unit, housing condition, and desirability of making home improvements through a grant process. Bressler said a large majority of the people would apply for a grant if it was provided. The majority of homes were found to be in good condition, but there were some homes needing improvement. During the field survey, Bressler personally viewed the conditions of the homes and properties. The vast majority are single family with some multi-housing units towards the west end of Livingston Avenue. The housing was categorized according to visual inspection by Bressler. The majority were in good or excellent condition. The overall ^pearance of garages showed that detached garages have received less maintenance. ^ere w ere a number of homes where brush, weeds, and outdoor storage took away from the appearance of the properties. Bressler provided a picture board showing a representative pictorial view of what he found in the neighborhood by study areas. Lindquist inquired about the affordable housing level in Orono. Bressler said the housing valued at $115,000 or less is considered affordable housing for 1997. Information of housing in this category is available from Hennepin County but needs to be entered database.in a MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 17,1997 (#1 - Navarre Housing Study - Continued) Van Zomeren stated Lake Minnetonka area cities have met over the summer to discuss gathering information on housing in the revision of each community's Comprehensive Plan. Some of the cities lack affordable housing. The cities are attempting to work together on this issue and intend to hire a consultant to assist in this research. The Met Council has provided $ 17,000 towards the hiring of the consultant. The groundwork has been laid out in respect to review of affordable housing. Berg asked if a HRA block grant would be required, and if so, who would administer it. Van Zomeren said she did not know if this was necessary but noted that the programs use the same contact person and will investigate the matter. Lindquist asked Staff to keep the Planning Commission updated noting additional work is required. Bressler said additional work will be performed as review of the Comprehensive Plan continues. OLD BUSINESS - CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS (#2) #2290 ELAINE AND STEVE SILUS, 3235 CASCO CIRCLE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 6:45-6:47 P.M. The Applicants were unable to attend the meeting. Havm moved, McMillan seconded, to table Application #2290. Lindquist reported that the application would not be reviewed again until the January meeting of the Planning Commission. However, if the applicant agrees with the 5' minimum location of structure from the property line, the application will not require further review by the Planning Commission. Van Zomeren said she has spoken with Building Inspector Lyle Oman, who will issue a temporary certificate of occupancy for the applicants. Gravel will be placed on the driveway over the winter months. Van Zomeren will notify the neighbors of this situation. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 17, 1997 (#3) #2305 ROGER AND ELIZABETH OLSEN, 815 PARTENWOOD ROAD - VARIANCES - 6:47-7:03 P.M. The applicant and architect, Kathryn Alexander, were present. Bressler presented pictures of the property. The applicant is proposing remodeling and expansion of the residence to include a 4-stall attached garage. The application requires variances for lakeshore setback and hardcover in the 0-75' setback. There is no problem w ith average lakeshore setback as noted in the topographical map. The residence currently has a 3-stall side loading garage. The driveway configuration is proposed to be changed. The existing residence encroaches the lakeshore setback. The allowable building space is limited by the property. Only a portion of the existing foundation will remain; further information is included in the packet. The total hardcover is proposed at 19%. The 1.02 acre property is located in the one acre zoning district with 2/3 acre in the 0-75' setback. The street setback is also restricted. Bressler reported Staff recommended approval subject to maintaining a 34' lakeshore setback from the designated OHW where 75' is required. Encroachment on the lakeshore setback will not be increased by the improvements. Staff recommends hardcover be maintained at a maximum of 14.5% in the 0-75' lakeshore setback where 20% is existing, 16% is proposed, and none is allowed. Bressler indicated that the amount of existing hardcover excluding landscaping underlain by plastic is 14.5%. This figure could largely be met by eliminating several proposed decks and existing patio area on the lake side of the residence. By approving this percentage, there would be no net gain in the amount of hardcover on the property, not including plastic under landscaping. Staff recommends all landscape underlain by plastic in the 0-75' lakeshore setback be removed prior to commencement of new construction. The applicant has agreed to this provision. Staff also recommends that no further hardcover variances be granted to this property in the future. Mr. Olsen, in noting the difficult lot, said he preferred not to reduce the hardcover furtiier than the proposed 16% to 14.5%. Ms. Alexander said the total hardcover is less than the 25% allowed. Hawn informed the applicant that trading hardcover for landscaping underlain with plastic is not the same and does not justify the additional hardcover. Lindquist said he agreed noting there is a large amount of structure on the property and is of the opinion that the applicant should maintain the 14.5% hardcover maximum. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 17,1997 (#3 - #2305 Roger and Elizabeth Olsen - Continued) Stoddard asked Dressier to explain the suggestions for hardcover removal. Alexander noted that as suggested, the hardcover would still be over 14.5%. Dressier informed McMillan that he arrived at the 14.5% by subtracting the landscaping underlain with plastic from the hardcover. The balance of hardcover to be removed would come from eliminating a portion of the patio, dog run, decking, or decreasing the size of the addition. Olsen said that he would have to eliminate the existing patio or addition even if all of the decking was eliminated. Lindquist informed him that if the residence was new construction, he would not be allowed any structure in the 0-75' setback. Olsen acknowledged that the home would not have been able to be built to meet today's standards. 1 Alexander noted that the patio consists of pavers and asked if pavers with drainage holes is still deemed hardcover. Lindquist said they were. Alexander said eliminating 1.5% of hardcover would consist of 497 s.f When asked by Hawn what items are necessary, it was noted that the dog kennel could be gravel and the patio could be reduced in size. This would amount to less than the decrease being required. The patio is 810 s.f. and could be reduced. There were no public conunents. Stoddard moved, Hawn seconded, to approve Application #2305 for lakeshore setback, hardcover variance in 0-75' setback, subject to revised Staff recommendation including a 41' lakeshore setback variance for structure to remain at 34' from the OHW, hardcover variance for a maximum of 4415 s.f. in the 0-75' setback, and plastic under landscaping removed in the 0-75' setback. The reduction in hardcover in the 0-75’ setback will be decided by applicant subject to staff approval. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#4) #2308 BROOK PARK REALTY, 3560 SHORELINE DRIVE - PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND CLASS III PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - 7:03-7:39 P.M. Bill Gleason was present representing Brook Park Realty. Van Zomeren reported that the application was tabled at the last meeting to allow time for the applicant to meet with Staff, City Engineer, and landscape architect consultant from DSU. A revision was provided last week by the applicant. Engineering comments have been received. Van Zomeren did not receive comnients from the landscaping consultant. She did speak with a representative of the fire department. \MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 17,1997 • » (#4 - #2308 Brook Park Realty - Continued) The revised plan includes construction of 30 townhomes on 9.93 acre site with access from Livingston Avenue. The units are connected with four per building. The northerly units will be served by a road. The southern units will be served by a driveway. The Mound Fire Department would like to see the 6" water main looped, which will increase the unit cost by $1.50-$2.00 per square foot, or the units sprinkled. The 22' road width was recommended by the landscape architect in order to maintain trees. The City Engineer has agreed to that width, while noting it does not meet City standards. The issue involved is fire safety versus saving trees. The City Engineer supports the sanitary sewer and water design, which conflicts with the opinion of the fire department. Details will be required for final plan. City Engineer Kellogg recommended Livingston Avenue be extended to the west and sanitary and water main stubs be extended as well. The drainage area map was thought to show high calculations at 20 minute concentration and recommendation is made for a maximum time of concentration of 15 minutes. Pipe grading or sizes may need to be revised. A paved swale or erosion control should be provided downstream from the piping. Details of the pond outlet control and weir should be provided for review. The timber weir may present a future maintenance problem and an alternate outlet structure may be desired. The 19 units served by temporary cul-de-sac exceeds the maximum of 10 allowed. Van Zomeren noted there is no history in Orono of similar townhouse development and questioned whether this should be maintained or changed. Livingston Avenue design is not built to a 30 mph speed and the radius should be increased to 275 ft. or reduced speed warning signs installed, which Staff recommends. The City Engineer also asks that a typical street section be provided to verify the proposed pavement design. Van Zomeren said the landscape consultant has indicated that the revised plan is an improvement and noted the identification has been provided for the larger stands of trees. The preservation level of trees is at about 50%. Van Zomeren said it was her opinion that the application be tabled to the January meeting in order for review of fire department and engineering recommendations. Since there is a two month span of time, Van Zomeren said a recommendation could be made by the Planning Commission based on the comments received by the City Engineer and landscape consultant. Mr. Gleason said he received a letter dated November 13 from the landscape architect. Van Zomeren reported that she had not received it. A copy was given to Van Zomeren for her immediate review. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 17, 1997 (#4 - #2308 Brook Park Realty - Continued) Gleason said the 6" water line will come to the property line and there had been concern over the amount of water flow. As far as looping the main or sprinkling the units, Gleason said he would do what is required and asked if there was a way that the system could be looped. Gappa said he was unfamiliar with it and would have to review the layout to see if enough water could get to the location. Lindquist asked for comments from the applicant regarding the road width. Gleason said the fire marshal thought a 20' width was satisfactory and 22’ is proposed. He thought there was no other option for the dead-end cul-de-sac. Gleason said the owner of the property to the west is currently not interested in selling. Van Zomeren said the road would not be extended to the end of the property , only the sewer and water improvements would be located there. The driveway would dead-end at the cul-de-sac. Lindquist agreed that whatever occurs with the property to the west does not factor into this application. Hawn asked if the driveway could extend to CoRd 15. Gleason said no. Concern was voiced regarding the inability to turnaround at the dead-end. Lindquist questioned whether a cul-de-sac could be built there. Hawn was informed that the driveways would be two car lengths. No parking would be allowed along the side of the road. Guests would have to park in the driveway of the units or gain permission from other residents to park in their driveways. There were no public comments. Lindquist asked about the time schedule. Gleason said he was beginning to enter a time crunch due to having v »redesign the subdivision. He noted that he was uninformed of any problem with the driveway until now. The fire department had not indicated that having to back into a driveway to turnaround would be a problem. Gleason said it is not a through street, only a private driveway, and access can be gained. Gleason did not believe there was room for a cul-de-sac and additional trees would be lost. Lindquist noted that three residences are allowed on private driveways for single family residences and in this proposal, there are 11 units. Gleason noted there were no guidelines for townhomes in Orono and as a result, new' issues are continually being raised. Stoddard indicated that the Commission was attempting to balance safety with tree preservation. He supported having a turnaround. He did not envision a problem regarding the looped water main or sprinkler system since the applicant was willing to do what is necessary. ' ‘ MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 17, 1997 (^4 - #2308 Brook Park Realty - Continued) Gleason suggested the possibility of constructing a hammerhead at the end of the driveway instead of a turnaround. Gappa thought that was feasible noting it has been done elsewhere. Gleason said this would solve the problem of inadequate room for a complete turnaround. Gleason said he would mark the driveway as a private drive. Lindquist asked if there were any problems with the landscape report. Gleason indicated there were no problems as far as he was concerned. He said he is in favor of adding landscaping and reducing the setback for saving trees. He questioned the need for a buffer from the garages facing CoRd 15 as there is a considerable distance separating the two. He said landscaping is beneficial for marketing. Gleason thought the landscape plan could be approved when the final plat is presented. McMillan noted the design for the front doors being in the middle of the units. She asked if this was advantageous for those in the middle units having to walk all around. She asked if this was a question of providing a conunon area versus losing privacy. Gleason thought the residents will use their garage entries. Guests may walk around or possibly use the garage entry as well. Gleason feels the courtyards will be attractive and be private with the trees surrounding them. Any problem would be more for guests than for the residents. Gleason said there was the possibility of moving the two middle units forward and placing a service door on the side of the garage. Gleason did not believe this was an issue, however, with only four units per building. McMillan said some privacy would be lost by the middle units with walking traffic going back and forth. McMillan asked about snow plowing. Gleason said the shoveling will be pi.ovided by the homeowners association. He added that the area would be very wooded and walkways will wind around the treed areas. Gleason thought the courtyards will be used by the residents noting there are patios by the front doors as well. Lindquist noted the issues of the 6" loop or sprinkler, hammerhead, landscaping reconunendations, and fire chief report have been reviewed. Van Zomeren said she would like to know what the applicant is required to do regarding the road. Lindquist indicated the 22' width and hammerhead would be a sufficient tradeoff for preserving trees and was satisfactory with the fire chief. Hawn asked if a 22' width was the maximum that could be provided. Gleason did not know if any wider road could be provided and did not see any reason to expand diat width. The length is more of a concern but is solved with the use of a hammerhead. Gappa noted the difference between single family and townhome units and the ordinance applying to single family residences. He thought the shorter length was a trade-off. r MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 17, 1997 (#4 - #2308 Brook Park Realty - Continued) Van Zomeren said the preliminary plat and PRD will move forward to the Council for their review. Conformity to subdivision regulations will be reviewed. A letter of credit will be necessary or public improvements installed. Lindquist thought a letter of credit would be satisfactory. The next step after Council review will then be final plat. Hawn asked about the center island suggested by the landscape architect. Van Zomeren said the reasoning was to lessen the amount of pavement made by a cul-de-sac. Gleason said he thought the decision was made to eliminate an island. Van Zomeren said the City Engineer did not favor the island but the recommendation was made by the architect. Gappa reported that an island is not desirable for effective snowplowing. Lindquist moved, Stoddard seconded, to approve Application #2308 for preliminary plat. Before final plat review, the water loop or sprinkler system needs to be resolved. A revised plan with a hammerhead turnaround that addresses the landscape architect's and City Engineer's comments will need to be submited. The revised plan will not include a center island in the cul-de-sac. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. NEW BUSINESS - PUBLIC HEARINGS (#5) #2311 LOREN FRITZ, 3845 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCE - 7:39- 7:45 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. The Applicant was present. Photos of the property were presented. Bressler reported that the applicant is proposing a total of 914 s.f. of additions to the existing residence. The existing residence is located 7' from the rear lot line. The proposed addition will be located wiihin the required rear setback but will not further encroach the required yard than the existing residence. Bressler reviewed the issues 1 through 6 as reported in the packet. The sloping topography was noted. The existing deck, residence and proposed additions are 5', 7', and 16.r from the rear lot line, respectively. A prior rear yard variance was granted in 1975. It was noted that a wood retaining wall is located on the neighboring property to the south. The high volume of traffic is also considered a deterrent to locating the addition closer to the road. Staff recommended approval of the rear yard variance with the existing shed relocated to a location meeting the yard setback requirements or be removed. 8 Jt r f MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 17,1997 (#5 - #2311 Loren Fritz - Continued) Lindquist recommended the applicant come to an agreement with the neighboring property owner regarding the wood retaining wall. Fritz said the wall is a replacement of what already existed to prevent erosion, and his neighbor supported the building of the wall. Fritz said the shed has been there for 30 years and is in good repair. It is used for lawn equipment. Fritz said he would object to removing the shed as it does not create any problem for the neighbors and is overshadowed by the bam to the west. There were no public comments. Lindquist said he supported the proposed addition and maintaining the wood retaining wall. However, he recommended the shed be moved. Fritz said the relocation of the shed would create an eyesore if relocated. Fritz also indicated that he would have to dismantle the shed as it is bolted down. Mrs. Fritz said the area suggested for the shed location is marshland and unbuildable. McMillan asked if the shed would require rebuilding when it became deteriorated, if it could be built in the same location. Dressier said it would require a variance. Dressier said the shed is in good condition at this timt; Lindquist moved, McMillan seconded, to approve the rear setback variance of 13.9' to allow the proposed addition to be located 16.1' from the rear lot line where 7' is existing and 30' is allowed. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#6> #2313 TOM AND KARISTEINKE, 910 DAKOTA AVENUE - VARIANCE - 7:45-7:49 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. The Applicant was present. Dressier presented photographs of the property. The proposal is for construction of a second story addition over the existing residence. The existing residence currently encroaches the side setback. The variance would allow additional structuie in the required setback but would not encroach further. Dressier reviewed the four issues as indicated in the packet. Staff recommended approval of the application. Mr. Steinke had no further comments. J MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 17,1997 (#6 - #2313 Tom and Kari Steinke - Continued) Mrs. Steinke indicated that the addition would be a bedroom over the dining room. The residence currently has a walk-up attic. There were no public conunents. Stoddard moved, Hawn seconded, to approve Application #2313 for a side yard setek variance of 17.6' to allow the existing side yard setback of 12.4' to remain where 30 is required. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#7) #2314 JOHN BESSESEN, 2505-2507 KELLY AVENUE - ZONING AMENDING AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 7:49-9:00 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. The Applicant was present. i'Van Zomeren reported the applicant is requesting a zoning amendment to revise the duplex credit district. If that approval is received, a conditional use pemit would be required. As the ordinance is currently written, a conditional use permit would only be possible if the zoning lot is adjacent to an industrial or commercial zone and built within 200' of that zone. Van Zomeren showed the location of the Highway 12 industrial area ^d the residential area within 200* that is not separated by a roadway. The area eligible is located to Ae south of the highway. Staff has historically required that adjacent lot lines be contiguous. If a more liberal viewpoint was taken and the road was not considered, that area could possibly cross the road. The other location is in Navarre. Van Zomeren displayed where the subject lot and commercial zoning is located. Van Zomeren said the terminology in the code needs clarification. The existing location where the fire station was located is not eligible for duplex credit as it is outside the commercial zone and the 200* limitation. Van Zomeren said she and Gaffron discussed modifying the duplex credit. The B-3 zoning is the only zoning that could be extended to capture that lot and eliminate the 200 requirement. The 200 ’ eligibility could be changed to reflect 400 ’ frorn the B-3 district. The B-1 and B-6 zoning districts would be eliminated for duplex credit. 4' f J MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 17,1997 (#7 - #2314 John Bessesen - Continued) Van Zomeren said, if the City's intent is to allow duplex housing, it first needs to be determined where that housing should be located and tlien place it in the zoning. She does not feel it makes sense where the use is currently allocated. She says it is important to buffer the industrial and commercial areas with higher density but is not the best method to achieve this end. The zoning situation for the subject lot needs to be revised before the lot is eligible for a conditional use permit. Van Zomeren is concerned that the "duplex credit" is a moving target because it changes based on commerc.’al or industrial zoning. Van Zomeren reported that there are alot of small lots where duplexes can currently be located under the duplex credit process. She feels this should not be encouraged. The church property rezoning that occurred in 1996 changed the 200’ eligibility and needs to be eliminated in her opinion. Van Zomeren asked if the non-conforming structure should be demolished and the area zoned for duplex. The presence of Outlot A at the lakeshore precludes single family development, according to the applicant. Research found that the reasoning behind the outlot had to do with a concern over multiple docks on the wetlands. Van Zomeren said the most restrictive way to change the ordinance to allow the property to have a duplex constructed on it would ^ through the B-3 district. This would not affect the existing duplexes. John Bessesen had no comments at this point. The hearing was opened for public comments. Todd Jones, 2501 and 2503 Kelly Avenue, reported that his property is adjacent to the subject property. Jones said he is unclear on what four lots are affected. Van Zomeren explained where the lots are located. The 400' limitation would add two single family lots to the south. Jones said he cannot see the single family lots being utilized for the duplex use. He agrees the site is blighted and understands the problem with setback. He believes the opportunity for duplexes would be good for the city. He believes the plan is reasonable and would clean up the property. Austin Evans, 2497 Kelly Avenue, lives north of the subject property in a townhome, and cited the text amendment. He said the subject property has bron on the market for five years and its current condition is not in keeping with the neighborhood. He understands the economical problems with providing a single family residence. He feels changing the zoning to accomplish the request is extreme. He feels changing the existing duplexes zoning allowing one dwelling unit on 1/2 acre is more feasible. Evans feels the only use of the property as it is now is to have the City condemn it and make it a park. Evans believes all the residents along Kelly Avenue would support the redevelopment to a duplex. I r MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 17,1997 (#7 - #2314 John Bessesen - Continued) Chuck and Candy Nadler, 2509 Kelly Avenue, live south of the subject property. Chuck Nadler said he is concerned with rezoning the area to the east to allow more duplexes. He is not sure this would be the right solution. Nadler wanted the applicant to answer whether he will do as he is proposing. If so, Nadler said he would support the application. He believes the proposal would result in a high quality duplex. Nadler indicated that Outlot A creates the problem for creating a single family residence. He is not convinced that the outlot could not be eliminated if the townhome residents and City work together. Evans said he would be willing to aid in eliminating the outlot and get all docks in the same location. Jones thought this solution could be worked out but wanted to maintain the right to enjoy more lakeshore for walking. Bessesen said he had presumed the property was zoned for duplexes when the purchase agreement was written. He found out differently when the property was surveyed. Bessesen said the plans call for duplexes at a value of $350,000-$400,000 for each side. He did have a concern with the gas station nearby but had a Phase I EIS conducted, which showed .no problems. He then found that the zoning is for single family site but the outlot is problematic. Bessesen said the Kelly Avenue Association owns the property around the townhomes. Outlot A is landlocked and causes problems for single family purposes. If the outlot was eliminated, he would prefer to build a single family residence. The existing four townhomes could establish docks in front of their own units. Bessesen said he represents the owner, Bradley Hoyt. He would like the opportunity to work out any problems if possible to improve Kelly Avenue. Stoddard said he appreciates Staffs initiative in extending the zone to 400'. He believes it will affect four lots, two of which have sold for over $1,000,000. He does not believe it would be a good idea to change the zoning in order to change these lots. Stoddard said the outlot has presented a problem for perspective buyers of the property. He believes single family housing is preferable in the neighborhood. He said consideration could be given to change the zoning for the one lot. Bessesen responded that State law does not allow this to occur. Bessesen noted the rights of the townhome owners regarding the outlot and would like to be able to build another townhome. He indicated that Hoyt has listed his home for sale and plans on living in one of the units. Stoddard suggested Bessesen speak with the neighbors regarding their feelings and obtain information on the background of Outlot A. i t MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 17,1997 (#7 - #2314 John Bessesen - Continued) Van Zomeren said previous noted Staff concerns with impacts on the wetlands if more docks were established. She believes the outlot was established because of dock issues. Van Zomeren said other regulatory bodies will have to be contacted regarding establishing docks in front of townhomes. She noted the amount of wetlands is large. Steve Weckman had informed her that the wetland map is confusing and requires further delineation. Berg noted there were similar docks located on Carman Bay, Nadler said he had been informed that Outlot A had been negotiated with the City and dealt with where the townhomes were built and the desire of a property owner to have docks located in one area. Jabbour agreed that dock clustering was encouraged at that time. Nadler suggested working with the property owners to have docks located in front of the units if proven economical. Jabbour said the history behind the outlot needs to be determined and the Commission needs to either agree or disagree with whether economics is dictating the location Berg noted that the lot across the street is unbuildable. Lindquist indicated that the action to be taken at this time is for conceptual approval Commission noted difficulty in changing the zoning. Commissioners ^l agreed that new development is desired but questioned whether it should be single family residence or a duplex. HaAvn said she would be willing to look at eliminating Outlot A if it can be done and changing the zoning. She agrees with Van Zomeren that rewriting the zoning around one property is not a good solution and Commission should determine where duplexes should be located in the City. Bessesen said he understands the reasoning behind Van Zomeren’s suggestions and the need to determine what method can accomplish it. Hawn said the issue needs to be reviewed comprehensively. Berg said research must be done on the history of Outlot A. Van Zomeren read the minutes of the 10/3/77 Planning Commission Meeting regarding Outlot A. She asked if the docks could be re-established for each duplex in order to eliminate Outlot A. Berg said the townhomes first have to be reviewed. Lindquist said rezoning can then be done. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 17,1997 (#7 - #2314 John Bessesen - Continued) Van Zomeren said the existing townhomes and this site could be rezoned and the density changed by text amendment using 400' or less. She noted she is not particularly in favor of using a distance measurement. She would prefer to eliminate the duplex credit as it currently exists. Jabbour informed the Commission how the duplex credit was established with the Shoreland Ordinance in the early 1990's. He noted there would be two PUDs for consideration in the near future. Jabbour thought the areas could be changed and the application done as a PUD. Van Zomeren said because the property does not quality for a conditional use permit, she does not believe it meets the acreage requirement for PUD. Van Zomeren indicated that the Planning Commission could consider recommending that the legal non-conforming use be re-established as a use on a lot of record if it met all other requirements; that would require amending a different section of the Zoning Code relating to non-conforming uses. The extend of the impact for this method is not known. Hawn asked what would take longer, the 400' text amendment or determining location for duplexes. Van Zomeren said the problem is textually amending the ordinance, which has the effect of a spot zoning. She is reluctant to do that at this time because the Comprehensive Plan is due to be revised before the end of 1998. Stoddard noted the neighbors comments that were made regarding the legal non- conforming use, zoning for the neighborhood, and the blighted site. He felt the outcome is dependent on the applicant. He suggested the applicant speak with the neighbors regarding changing the outlet and then construct a single family home, which he felt would be the best solution for both the City and the neighborhood. However, Stoddard said the issue before the Commission is to determine if a duplex would fit in with the neighborhood. Stoddard moved, Lindquist seconded, to approve Application #23 • 4 approving a duplex at that address due to the existing legal non-conforming use and change the zoning to establish the legal use provided no other variances are required on the construction. Lindquist questioned whether this can be done. Van Zomeren said it would be an amendment to another section of the zoning code but the; *: is no language to that effect. She indicated this cannot be drafted without renotifyinj* O'u; public. Van Zomeren said a text amendment can be broadly done. This motion woi - : o. ^-.vre the application to be reviewed again in January. Van Zomeren cited the ordi.iarci ii^ctions suggesting the text amendment be revised to apply only to the B3 District and the distance be reduced from 400' to 250'. Stoddard withdrew his motion. r V MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 17,1997 (#7 - #2314 John Bessesen - Continued) k I r'' Jabbour indicated that this would require a 4/5th majority vote by Council and could not be reviewec until December 8 when a full Council would be in attendance. Stoddard moved, McMillan seconded, to approve Application #2314 for ctmstruction of a duplex amending this single lot zoning to include duplex credit approvals ior construction within 250 ’ from B-3 building due to its legal non-conforming use. McMillan questioned whether the property was more than 250 ’ from the B-3 zoning. The number of docks (3) and their length (25') were noted. They are located adjacent to the neighboring property and allows people to walk across the outlet. Stoddard noted that the motion would allow the applicant and Staff to see what can be done before review at the 12/8 Council meeUng. McMillan noted that LMCD approval would be required for moving the docks. It was noted that the language as it currently exists in the ordinance needs to be narrowed and limited to the B-3. Stoddard said there may be no need for an amendment as he feels the distance is less than previously thought. Stoddard amended his motion to eliminate the existing language in the code regarding duplex credit. McMillan seconded the amendment to the motion. Lindquist questioned how the Commission could get duplex zoning back m place with this motion. It would require Comprehensive Plan review and changes made. Lindquist said the motion would allow this application to go forward but additional work would be required. Hawn questioned whether the motion could legally be done noting the current rights of the propert}' owners. Van Zomeren said the public notice posted would serve as noUce for this motion. The motion was separated into two motions. The motion read: to approve Application #2314 for construction of a duplex and amend the single lot zoning to include the duplex credit approval for construction within 250 ot the B-3 zoning district due to its legal non-conforming use. Vote: Ayes 3, McMillan, Stoddard, Berg; Nays 2, Lindquist, Hawn. Motion passed. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 17,1997 (#7 - #2314 John Bessesen - Continued) Stoddard moved but received no second to eliminate the language to allow duplex credit to the zoning code. McMillan suggested the issue be further reviewed before sending the recommendation to the Council. Lindquist said he voted against the motion as he is against spot zoning but supports the plan itself The applicant was asked to research the background of Outlot A prior to the Council Meeting on December 8. Bessesen will work with Van Zomeren to solve issues of concern. (#8) CITY OF ORONO - ZONING AMENDMENT - LAND ALTERATION REGULATIONS AND PERMIT CRITERIA - 9:10-9:12 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Gappa reported that the zoning amendment is a housekeeping matter to streamline the current code. The code currently requires a conditional use permit for any land alteration over 100 cubic yards. This creates a problem for what may be minor work. Staff has concluded that a Staff permit process should take place and change the ordinance to reflect the need for a CUP for land alteration over 500 cubic yards. There were no public comments. Lindquist moved, Berg seconded, to recommend approval of the Zoning Amending for Land Alteration Regulations and Permit Criteria. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS (#9) REPORT BY PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVES ATTENDING COUNCIL MEETINGS OF OCTOBER 27,1997 AND NOVEMBER 10,1997 No report was given. (#10) OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION The Planning Commission will meet on December 17, 1997 at 6:30 p.m. Items for discussion will include tree preservation, home occupation, and review research regarding prior variances. i 1 1 i I J I r-jr vl P w '.’1 "I MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 17,1997 (#10 - Other Issues for Discussion - Continued) McMillan asked that Park Commission Chair Wilson be notified of the meeting. Jabbour indicated that the meeting may include information regarding the elimination of calculating landscaping underlain with plastic in the 0-75* setback. Landscaping with plastic underlayment will be allowed in the 75-250' setback if the 25% hardcover allowance is met. Jabbour reported that the park dedication ordinance is being challenged, and the City Attorney will be drafting a new ordinance. He stated a direct nexus must be shown between the park services provided and any subdivision requiring park dedication fees. Jabbour asked the Planning Commission to further investigate any application where prior Councils placed future restrictions to determine the reasoning behind their decision. He cited an example where the Planning Commission listened to prior Council advice in a recommendation, but the current Council mistakenly did not, resulting in what he felt was a hastily drawn and incorrect conclusion. (#11) PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 20,1997 MEETING Stoddard moved, Lindquist seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of October 20,1997. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#12) PLANNING COMMISSION TO SELECT REPRESENTATIVES TO ATTEND THE COUNCIL MEETINGS OF NOVEMBER 24,1997 AND DECEMBER 8,1997 November 24 - Stoddard December 8 - Berg ADJOURNMENT Stoddard moved, Lindquist seconded, to adjourn at 9:23 p.m. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Dale Lindquist, Chair Person ar aa .rM7«~.nTr.3li r ini-ax.ti k.i \i \C(liAk\C\L PAClOni JAw il 1 u MTiJ tLcHJi M JAC^fi. Hennepin County ______ JL An Equal Opportuniiy Imploycr G/j/iy c December 29, 1997 I I \l : Mr. Gregory A, Gappa Director of Public Works City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway PO Box 6o Ciystal Bay, MN 55323 RE: Traffic Control Change CSAH 19 (N. Shore Dr.) at CSAH 151 (W. Branch Rd.) Deer Mr. Gappa: In response to a call from a concerned citizen, our staff recently conducted a traffic investigation and accident analysis at the referenced intersection. We find that traffic volumes and accident history warrant the installation of a FOUR­ WAY STOP which will be installed as soon as scheduling permits. If you have any questions, feel free to call me at 930-2680. Sincerely, Thomas D. Johnson, P.E. Transportation Planning Engineer TDJ;DAL:jrh cc: Jim Gnbe Deputnwnl of Public Woiki 320 Wiihington Avenue South Hopiufis, Minnesou 55343-8496 (612)930-2300 FAX:(6I2)930-2513 TDD:(61 21930-2696 IbcydtdF^ CARL T. JCHKSCN 3105 ^o^th Shore Drive Crono, ivin. 55391 pecew®’® :nOT owqWO •j - ^ i J *•, December 16, 1997 City og Crono 2750 Kelley Parkway Crono, y;n. 55323 Subject* Proper placement of a "run-off" water culvert under the driveway at 3115 Worth Shore Drive. Gabriel Jabfcour and City Council members* Thank you for the ”L0 PARKING" sign installed. We hope it will help keep our boulevard clear of ruts. The subject matter has been called to the attention of Mr. Bruce Vang and the builder Mr. Robert Waade in the past three months. They have promised to consider a fix. However, for the record, we'd like your group to be advised and over-see that it is done. This culvert diverts run-off water from four or more lots on the other side of Cty Rd 5I into the lake over our lot. If the culvert is not below the lake normal level the water backs up into our lot. The original culvert was properly placed. However, it deteriorated and collapsed over the years. Mr. Olson put in a new one without proper guidance from Crono. Another question we have- Will you allow a hard-cover drive-way at 3IO5 ? Hard-covor would again aggravate run-off, a condition, you plan to control more closely. ( 3ipcerel^.^"j Carl ubhnspn Irma C. Luhdouist j r I t A ' l! y f- CITY of OBONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Partway Orono, MN 55356 Mailini Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 0066 Carl T. Johnson 3105 North Shore Drive Orono, Minnesota 55391 Dear Mr. Johnson: We have received your letter regarding the driveway culvert at 3105 North Shore Drive. I have discussed this with Mr. Bruce Vang, Field Inspector. He has discussed this situation with Mr. Robert Waade, and the builder has agreed to correct this situation. My understanding is that the replacement culvert that was installed by the previous owner was put in too high and needs to be lowered. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please contact us should you have any coiri.ments or questions. Gregory A. Gappa Director of Public Services GAG/ch cc: Bruce Vang, Field Inspector TclephoDC (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 i r )Mll CARL T. JOHNSON 3105 North Shore Drive Orono, Mn. 55391 December 7» 1997 City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O.Box 66 Orono, Mn. 55323 Subject! A protest to your Council Resolution #3903 Mr. Gabriel Jabbour and city council memberst We write this letter to express our protest and dissatisfaction in your approval of the building being constructed on the site of 3115 North Shore Drive. Your City of Orono council resolution #3903* The building should be in harmony with adjacent land. This struc.ture violates this rule, espioiMlynoAhtheaet east.side. We strongly suggest you visit the site. Our visit to the council meeting, when this building was discussed, revealed that a story and a half home was under consideration. No approval was given at this meeting. Subsequent to this open meeting, no public hearing was held, however, approval of a two story building was approved. The building site has setbacks of four feet on the east side and less than three feet of hard surface on the west aide. These approved variances are flagrant. Fire and police services are totally impaired unless accomplished by trec:>ass and encroachment. The "privilage** which we adjacent land owners properly provide to emergency services is not featured in your approval of this building site. We then, are improperly burdened with this service. This buiding approval can hardly be considered a hardship justification. It is purely a real estate venture to exploit lake frontage at the expense and displeasure of adjacent property owners. page 1 m ■ ■■riiBi I ■■ 11 111 - ' 1 ' 1^1 A..- V.' -r ^ -■-.1 Ad I amm. . «^i>i ’H’r- .. I r-i-“ 'lllf VR J n We as neighors on the east are concerned as to the effect of this building on the value of our property. Also, the neighbor at 3135 North Shore Drive is shocked at height of the structure. Their view of the lake is greatly impaired. We believe you have lowered the bars as to what can be built in Orono. No consideration for effects on adjacent properties and harmony in general was studied in this resolution. Sincerely, T. Johnson ' "Irma 0. Lund^ist J ccj Orono Lity Attorney i 1 r i»»ii \ IMCC MINNETONKA COMMUNICATIONS COMM ISSION 540 SECOND STREET - RO. BC X 473 - EXCELSIOR. MN 55331-U473 612. 474-5539 • FAX 612. 474-0430 December 2,1997 Mayor Gabriel Jabbour City Council Members City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway/P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55323 1 1 1897 OEEWAVEN Dear Mayor Jabbour and Council Members: EXCEL5IOR greenwood LONG LAKE Triax CablevisioB and other communication challenges that ** ®*‘"*"*^y *"*"''*” MEDINA MINNETONKA BEACH considering future innovaUve technologies In addiUon, the potential po^ of Independence vriU clearly add strength to our effective means of influencing the communication performance of a regulated company. minnetrista $T. BONIFACWS (474.5539). ORONO shorewood Sincerely, LakeJdinnetonka Communic^ons Commission SPRING PARK TONKA BAY vKrroRiA Timothy J. Mtt Chairman WOODLAND Enclosure cc All Commissioners City Administrators ./t y% >\ 1 r [* r- ► r 54 RESOLUTION REGARDING RATIFICATION OF ADMITTANCE OF THE CITY OF INDEPENDENCE INTO THE LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WHEREAS, The Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission (“Commission”) is organized pursuant to a Joint Powers Agreement (“Agreement”) by and between the Cities of Deephaven, Excelsior, Greenwood, Long Lake, Medina, Minnetonka Beach, Minnetrista, Orono, St. Bonifacius, Shorewood, Spring Park, Tonka Bay, Victoria, and Woodland ( Member Cities ), adopted in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 238.08 and § 471.59; and WHEREAS, the Commission is authorized pursuant to the Agreement to grant, and has granted, a cable franchise to operate, construct, and maintain a cable television system within the Member Cities of the Commission, and administer and enforce such franchise on behalf of the Member Cities; and WHEREAS, Triax Midwest Associates, L.P. (“Triax”) is the current franchisee pursuant to the franchise granted by the Commission, and provides service to the Member Cities of the Commission; and WHEREAS, the City of Independence (“City ”) has indicated a desire that cable communications service be made available to residences within the City , and WHEREAS, Triax currently provides cable communications service to certain residents in the City; and WHEREAS, by Resolution dated August 19, 1997, the Commission invited the City to enter the Commission; and WHEREAS, by Resolution dated October 14, 1997, the City has approved entrance into the Commission upon the terms and conditions of the Agreement and the franchise granted by the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Agreement, Article IV, Section 4, provides that the Commission may admit new members by an affirmative vote of two-thirds (2/3) of the eligible votes of the Commission and may, by resolution, unpose conditions upon the admission of additional members; and WHEREAS, the Commission has determined that it is in the best interests of the Commission and its Member Cities that the City be admitted into the Commission. 4 - ir'TTiTi'ii TTlifitii II ii*t<iriBiiiiifiam ~fifiiiii• • iTi in —titt t nfirni -- —-------------------ffcMlWlH IHll I r>y I wr ‘I r ‘ Y NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Commission: 1.That the Commission hereby ratifies the admittance of the City as a new Member City upon the terms and conditions of the Agreement and the franchise granted by the Commission; 2.That the City and Conunission shall execute an amendment to the Agreement within ninety (90) days of the date of this Resolution. 3.That the City shall pay the Commission’s actual costs, expenses, and fees associated with admittance of the City into the Commission in an amount not to exceed $1,000.00. 4.That a copy of this Resolution shall be sent or otherwise provided to the City by the Commission’s staff immediately. 5.That the Commission’s staff is hereby directed to discuss and negotiate service extension by Triax to the City and report on the progress of such discussions at the next Commission meeting. 6. That this Resolution shall be effective immediately. Passed and adopted this 18th day of November, 1997. LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION C:\CABLEU-MCORESOLUn,009 w I J r i 0^ M i r hr fef'f' ■. ': f LMCCLAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 540 SECOND STREET ■ RO. BOX 473 ■ EXCELSIOR. MN 55331-0473 612. 474-5539 • FAX 612. 474-0430 December 2,1997 OEEPHAVEN EXCELSIOR GREEN\VOOO LONG LAKE MEDINA MINNETONKA BEACH MINNETRISTA ORONO ST. BONIFACKIS SHOREWOOO SniINC PARK TONKA BAY VICTORIA WOODLAND Mayor Gabriel Jabbour City Council Members City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway/P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55323 Dear Mayor Jabbour and Council Members: The Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission (LMCC), after several meetings of consideration, took formal action on November 18th (1997) to include the City of Independence in the Joint Powers Agreement This action wiU bnng them full representation and authority on the LMCC in subsequent dealings with Triax Cablevision and other communication challenges that we currently share when considering future innovative technologies. In addition, the potential gro^h of Independence will clearly add strength to our effective means of influencing the communication performance of a regulated company. Enclosed you will find an official copy of that Resolution, that amends our existing Joint Powers Agreement If the city wants another copy of the amended Joint Powers Agreement or you have any questions regarding this offidal action of the LMCC, please call Jim Daniels, our Administrator, at the office in Excelsior (474.5539). Sincerely, Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission Timothy J. Pattrin Chairman Enclosure cc All Commissioners City Administrators t4 L Dear Chief Administrative Officer: M you near the end of your annual budget process, you ’ve probably had to come to terms with how the tteTrld^^lte for Ihis and future years. Sincethe end of the 1997 legislative session, the League of Minnesota Cities Board of Directors has sought ways to educate legislalore and citizens about the negative impact levy limits can have on city HsS LtSon*' *^“8“ members have adopted a policy to repeal levy limits during the 1998 As l^C president, I need your help to make the repeal of levy limits a reality. Meet with your legislators and local newspapers and radio stations to make them aware of the true impact of levy limL and «plain ®loaders Lgaged in levy limits discussions in every cuy across the state. * ^ cmes'nt'ruTn il,rfThe first is a fact sheet about how J'.u T la* reform enacted last year, why levy limits were imposed, and how cities must Both '* “ I"”" ““I “"“I “> y°“r paper or radio stations fffectiTg your Sy ‘ ''''J' '‘">lP> “« ’ This mapng is the first of many opportunities for city officials to educate the public on statewide oolicv issues like levy limits. Future letters i„ the c itor or fact sheets may focus on pubi c right o^^^^ electrtc deregulation and what those issues mean to cities and their citizens. ^ If you have any que^ions about the draft letter, ’alking with your local newspaper, or about levy limits ii g Mral, please call Gary Carlson, director of Intergovernmental Relations, o.' Laura Petersen Public Relations c^rdinator. at 6 12.281.1200. Your comments are welcome and your panicipat on trenrial The more often these topics are discussed in the public arena at public meetings, on rad^o shows'Tin newspapers, the mo.-e citizens and legislators will learn about important city perspectives. Bob Long President AN EQUAL opportunity /affirmative ACTION EMPLOYER m • [Draft letter to the editor (or ask to submit it as a guest column); print out on city letterhead] Dear Editor: Over the past few months, the___(your city name].______City Council and staff have been working on our city budget. We’ve been juggling our community ’s needs for flist infrastructure, street improvements, library, paries, water tower- etc...]____with the money available in our budget. We’ve taken into account our future growth projections, the quality of our neighborhoods, the unique needs of our businesses and schools, and the equipment our city departments may need, like snow plows or fire engines. In other words, we’re considering the needs and wants of our neighbors, friends and families. Last spring, the legislators in St. Paul enacted a law limiting how citizens in__ city]______can spend our tax dollars. But these “levy limits’’ don’t take into consideration our [your good spending track record, our unique needs, or what services our community believes are important. In fact, levy limits can end up costing taxpayers more money because we have to borrow money for equipment or projects instead of saving and budgeting. Some groups that lobby at the state Legislature have accused cities of being the cause of rising property taxes in Minnesota. But look at the facts -- cities have held the line on our tax levies. From 1990 to 1996, cities increased their levies just 1.78 percent, adjusted for population and inflation. By contrast, counties increased their levies by more than 10 percent, and schools by more than 15 percent. If an individual city ’s levy did increase, it’s because that city faced unique needs, like a fast growing population, aging streets and sewers, or a natural disaster. Levy limits are just a political quick fix and not the answer to rising property taxes or reforming the property tax system. Levy limits arc a one-size-fits-all policy that ignore differing needs in the state ’s 850-plus cities. Cities are careful stewards of your tax dollars. As your local government, we are in the best position to make responsible decisions about the services in our community. We encourage citizen involvement in the budgeting process and will continue to work to meet your needs. And as members of the League of Minnesota Cities, we’ll be working next year to repeal levy limits and bring spending decisions back to our community. Sincerely, [mayor or city manager] / City Spending and Levy Limits Levy limits undermine the credibility and accountability of local officials who are closest to citizens and in the best position to make responsible decisions about spending and services in their communities. Cities are responsible stewards of their taxpayers* dollars and reimposing levy limits was a mistake. In many cases, levy limits force cities to delay maintenance projects or to increase their use of debt financing. Levy limits also erode cities* ability to meet new state and federal mandates. Levy limits are a one-size-fits-all answer that ignores differences in local circumstances. Levy limits are not property tax reform. Four years ago, the Legislature recognized that levy limits were counterproductive and eliminated them. Reimposing limits is a quick fix and the easiest political solution to property tax reform. The current law only affects cities with populations of more than 2,500 and is supposed to sunset in two years. But many city leaders and decision-makers believe levy limits may not be removed in two years and may be extended to all cities. The League believes levy limits are unacceptable and poor fiscal policy, and will call for their repeal. Prepared by the League of Minnesota Cities November 1997 --i.irMVM' - - -J RBPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATS OF RUN 12/01/97 PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED *«*** YEAR-TO-DATE PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO PERMIT TYPE Building SQL FAMILY-NEN SF-ADD/REMODEL SF-ACC STRUCTURE DEMO/PRINCIPAL COMNERCIAL-NEN COM-ADO/RBMODEL COM-ACC STRUCTUR DEMO INST-ADD/REMODBL XNST-ACC STRUCT PLAN REVIBN ONLY DEMO-ACCESSORY ACC/OARAOBS Sub-total Mechanical HEATING SYSTEMS AIR C(»lDITIONINa NOOD STOVB/FLUB FIREPLACE VENTILATION FUEL STORAGE GAS LINE INSPECT DUCT WORK ONLY REMOVE OIL TANK UNDEFINED Sub-total Plunbing FIXTURES SPRINKLER HATER METER VACUUM BREAKER UNDEFINED Sub-total 8e«»er fc Hater SBNBR CONNECTION HATER CONNECTION NBN SEPTIC SYSTB DRNFLD (./OR TANK 8AC ONLY SBNBR DISCONNECT SBNBR 6 HATER UNDEFINED Sub-total Sign PBRMANBNT/POSTBD QTY 3««30l 26 16 2 9 1 2 3 1 0 -- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/97 - 11/30/97 BASE FEB 72,622.50 79,940.97 5.175.50 890.00 3.024.50 3,329.00 162.25 100.00 2,010.25 29.25 0.00 VALUATION Ill 864, 4ldi, 854.92 641.60 0.00 450,000.00 363.646.00 10,000.00 0.00 228.310.00 775.00 0.00 11 360.00 0.00 12 2,731.50 180,047.80 418*170,375.72*21,173,165.97* 120 11,288.29 867,498.38 12 573.51 40,045.00 1 35.00 2,500.00 64 2,461.06 127,008.55 7 245.00 11,060.00 1 125.00 10,000.00 21 735.00 10,335.00 7 245.00 8,365.00 13 1,270.00 81,450.00 1 35.00 900.00 247*17,012.86*1,159,161.93* 167 12,466.69 808,439.85 4 231.69 14,535.00 11 2,058.99 0.00 6 210.00 1,700.00 5 176.25 6,900.00 193*15,143.62*831,574.85* 35 1,225.00 0.00 4 140.00 0.00 37 3,700.00 0.00 4 250.00 0.00 24 20,900.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 5 350.00 0.00 4 140.00 0.00 113*26.705.00*0.00* 0 0.00 o.co PLAN REVIEW 47,204.55 38,968.50 3,329.64 0.00 1,965.92 494.81 105.46 0.00 499.20 19.01 0.00 0.00 1,775.48 94,362.57* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 c.oo* 0.00 PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: LIN DUS RANGE - - - 01/01/96 - 11/30/96 QTY BASE FEE VALUATION 41 79,734.75 12,811,121.58 243 50,920.25 4,002,792.00 28 4,016.75 248,982.00 11 720.00 0.00 1 4,948.50 985,000.00 7 1,876.00 179,026.00 0 0.00 0.00 2 110.00 0.00 3 2,349.25 252,720.00 0 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 3 90.00 0.00 19 3,287.25 210,592.00 359*148,052.75*18,690,233.58* 99 9,215.58 712,083.28 16 772.40 53,051.00 4 167.01 7,760.43 58 2,447.59 142,455.44 5 175.00 5,375.00 2 347.50 26,000.00 12 610.00 26,675.00 11 427.94 15,920.00 11 405.00 16,105.00 0 0.00 0.00 218*14,568.02*1,005,425.15* 153 10,748.70 676,050.47 0 0.00 0.00 10 1,502.C‘;2,750.00 0 0.00 0.00 4 140.00 1,150.00 167*12,390.70*679,950.47* 20 700.00 0.00 2 70.00 0.00 54 5,350.00 0.00 7 350.00 0.00 11 6,550.00 0.00 1 35.00 0.00 10 700.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 105*13,755.00*0.00* 1 35.00 0.00 PLAN REVIEW 51,827.49 24,542.90 2,410.55 0.00 3,216.53 496.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,714.21 0.00 1,950.33 86,158.61* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED YEAR-TO-DATE REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DRTB OP RUN 12/01/97 ***** PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO PAGE: REQUESTER: LIN -- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/97 - 11/30/97 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/96 - 11/30/96 PERMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEN PER./FREE STANDG 3 118.25 3,300.00 0.00 2 366.50 24,305.00 0.00 TEMPORARY 5 155.00 0.00 0.00 4 120.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 8*273.25*3,300.00*0.00*7*521.50*24,305.00*0.00* Fira - - - FIRE SPRINKLER 1 140.00 11,200.w''0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 FIRE SPRINKLER 1 187.50 15,000.00 0.00 1 170.64 13,651.00 0.00 Sub-total 2^327.50*26,200.00*0.00*1*170.64*13,651.00*0.00* Uaar Defined LAND ALTERATION 20 l,025.v7 0.00 0.00 22 1,225.00 0.00 0.00 TREE REMOVAL 3 90.00 0.00 0.00 5 150.00 0.00 0.00 RETAINING NALLS 1 62.25 2,000.00 0.00 4 396.00 29,790.00 0.00 DOCKS 3 90.00 2,500.00 0.00 2 60.00 0.00 0 - ;':0 LANN SPRINKLER 34 1,190.00 0.00 0.00 26 910.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 61*2,457.25*4,500.00*0.00*59*2,741.00*29,790.00*0.00* Grand-total 1,042**232,2:-i.20**23,197,902.75**94,362.57**916**192,199.61**20,443,355.20**86,158.61** PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED YEAR-TO-DATE REPORT N8R. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 12jQ\l31 PERMIT FEE CITY OF FROM 01/01/97 REPORT ♦♦' ORONO TO 11/30/97 PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: LIN BUILDING MECHANICAL PLUMBING SEWER & WATER ur.ER SIGN FIRE BASE FEE 170,375.72 17,012.86 15,143.62 26,705.00 2,457.25 273.25 327.50 PLAN REVIEW 94,362.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 10,606.19 586.91 435.63 44.50 17.00 0.50 13.10 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SAC 6,650.00 0.00 0.00 14,550.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 2,801.00 35.00 225.00 0.00 245.00 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAIL IN 204.99 105.73 3.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 SEWER CONNECTION MAILING FEB 225.00 1.50 MAIL IN 1.50 ESCROW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 285,020.48 17,841.26 15,911.48 41,302.50 2,722.25 274.75 343.60 REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 12/01/97 ***** PERMIT FEE REPORT ** CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/97 TO 11/30/97 PAGE: REQUESTER: LIN BASE FEE PLAN REVIEW SURCHARGE Lie. SEARCH FEE SAC INVESTIGATION DEPOSIT MAIL IN SEWER CONNECTION MAILING FSB MAIL IN ESCROW REPORT TOTAL 232,295.20 94,362.57 11,703.83 0.00 21,200.00 3,306.00 0.00 320. /2 225.00 1.50 1.50 0.00 ZONING PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTEL REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OP RUN 12/01/97 --------- r'lTDDPM'T ***** PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO 0 7VMr*i:» ***** __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _DDPVTmiQ REQUESTER; D ZVMrZP ------------ PAGE: 1 LIN PERMIT TYPE QTY 01/01/97 - BASE FEE - - - - - - 11/30/97 VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY 01/01/96 - BASE FEE IvrVlMol!* ------------ 11/30/96 VALUATION PLAN REVIEW User Defined SUBDIVISION 12 16,805.00 0.00 0.00 12 6,895.00 0.00 0.00 VARIANCE 69 15,680.00 0.00 0.00 53 12,115.00 0.00 0.00 CUP 15 3,475.00 0.00 0.00 12 3,100.00 0.00 0.00 SKETCH PLAN 6 1,500.00 0.00 0.00 4 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 VARIANCE/CUP 3 795.00 0.00 0.00 7 1,940.00 0.00 0.00 VACATION 3 800.00 0.00 0.00 4 1,150.00 0.00 0.00 REZONING 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 350.00 0.00 0.00 APPEAL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 350.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 110*39,135.00*0.00*0.00*95*26,900.00*0.00*0.00* Grand-total 110**39,135.00**0.00**0.00**95**26,900.00**0.00**0.00** REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 12/01/97 ***** PERMIT FEE REPORT ***** CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/97 TO 11/30/97 USER REPORT TOTAL BASE FEB 39,135.00 39,135.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 SAC 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 ESCROW ^0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 39,135.00 39,135.00 PAGE: REQUESTER: LIN i 4 ,I 1997 RECAP OF CONTRACT CITIES January February March April May June July August Septctnbcr October 1November Deccfnber YTD Totals 209.96 u.oo 746.52 141.37 36.89 1,391.81 3,326.38 195.00 90.00 90.00 150.00 150.00 225.00 1,435.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 275.00 429.96 115.00 861.52 316.37 211.89 1,641.81 6,785.08 3 0 6 3 2 4 29 13 6 6 10 10 15 117 19.01 1,400.89 3,856.78 1,529.93 621.24 334.43 8,434.22 75.00 180.00 150.00 105.00 195.00 90.00 1,455.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 275.00 119.01 1,605.89 4,031.78 1,659.93 841.24 449.43 10,164.22 Spring Park Plan Review 422.34 0.00 89.21 94.74 Inspections 135.00 165.00 270.00 165.00 Retainer 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 TOTAL 582.34 190.00 384.21 284.74 No. Plan Reviews 1 0 1 2 No. Inspections 9 11 18 11 Minnetonka Beach Plan Review 0.00 0.00 105.30 48.59 Inspections 45.00 180.00 210.00 195.00 Retainer 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 TOTAL 70.00 205.00 340.30 268.59 No. Plan Reviews 0 0 2 1 No. Inspections 3 12 14 13 652.34 395.00 724.51 553.33 1.622.24 120.00 25.00 1.767.24 7 8 518.05 30.00 25.00 573.05 2 2 4 12 6 10 5 7 2 13 2 6 25 97 2,340 29 548.97 1,720.89 4,893.30 1,976.30 1,053.13 2,091.24 16,949.30 PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED NOVEMBER 1997 REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OP RUN 12/01/97 *«*»* permit issued report CITY OP ORONO PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: LIN PERMIT TYPE Building SQL PAMXLY-NBH SP-AOD/REMODEL SP-ACC STRUCTURE DEMO/PRINCZPAL C0M1ERCIAL-NEN COM-ADD/RSMODEL CON-ACC STRUCTUR DEMO INST-AIM)/REMODBL DEMO-ACCESSORY ACC/GARAGES Sub-total Meduuiical HEATING SYSTEMS AIR CONDITIONING MOOD STOVE/PLUE PIREPLACE GAS LINE INSPECT DUCT NORK ONLY REMOVE OIL TANK Sub-total Plumbing PIXTURBS MATER METER VACUUM BREAKER UNDEPZNBD Sub-total Sewer fc Mater SBMBR CONNECTION MATER CONNECTION NEM SEPTIC SYSTB DRNPLD 6/OR TANK SAC <»1LY SBMBR 6 MATER UNDBPZNBD Sub-total Sign PBR./PRBB STANDG TEMPORARY Sub-total Pire PIRB SPRINKLER Sub-total Vnr^T Defln*‘d -- CURRENT RANGE - 11/01/97 - 11/30/97 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 11/01/96 - 11/30/96 QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION 3 • 10,294.00 1<7777'9S 8-1-84-6,691.09 4 7,344.00 1,158,081.58 28 12,831.22 ^1326,496.75 7,377.82 12 2,J17.50 185,366.00 2 627.00 47,000.00 407.55 2 682.00 50,0C0.00 2 100.00 0.00 0.00 1 80.00 0.00 1 2,137.25 350,000.00 1,389.21 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 187.25 12,000.00 1 162.25 10,000.00 105.46 0 O.CO 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 30.00 0.00 1 430.75 34,000.00 279.99 0 0.00 0.00 1 30.00 0.00 0.00 1 30.00 0.00 2 637.00 44,240.00 414.05 0 0.00 0.00 41*27,249.47*3,889,694.99*16,665.17*22*10,670.75*1,405,447.58* 27 2,129.99 157,463.00 0.00 9 1,122.50 87,200.00 1 45.63 3,650.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.70 2 70.00 1,700.00 10 451.37 30,910.00 0.00 4 174.88 12,090.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 140.00 3,325.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 500.00 1 35.00 1,200.00 O.OC 0 0.00 0.00 39*2,661.99*193,223.00*0.00*20*1,542.38*104,815.00* 17 1,570.63 116,989.00 0.00 11 896.15 58,002.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 191.00 0.00 •1 35.00 500.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 500.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 19*1,640.63*117,989.00*0.00*12*1,087.15*58,002.00* 22 770.00 0.00 0.00 4 140.00 0.00 1 35.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 2 200.00 0.00 0.00 2 200.00 0.00 0 0.00 D.OO c.oo 1 50.00 0.00 12 11,400.00 C.OO 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1 70.00 0.00 0.00 3 210.00 0.00 1 35.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 39*12,510.00*0.00*0.00*10*600.00*0.00* 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 337.25 23,505.00 1 35.00 0.00 0.00 1 30.00 0.00 1*35.00*0.00*0.00*2*367.25*23,505.00* 1 187.50 15,000.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1*187.50*15,000.00*0.00*0*0.00*0.00* PLAN REVIEW 4,773.59 1,161.06 443.30 0.00 0.00 121.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,499.66* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00c.oo 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.co 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00* PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED NOVEMBER 1997 REPORT NDR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OP RUN 12/01/97 PERMIT TYPE LAWN SPRINKLER Sub-total Grand-total QTY 3 147** PERMIT ISSUED REPORT ***** CITY OF ORONO -- CURRENT RANGE - 11/01/97 - 11/30/97 BASE FEE 105.00 305.00* VALUATION 0.00 0.00* 44,589.59** 4,215,906.99** PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00* 16,665.17** QTY 0 0* 66** PAGE: REQUESTER: LIN -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 11/01/96 - 11/30/96 BASE FEB 0.00 0.00* VALUATION 0.00 0.00* 14,267.53** 1,591,769.58** PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00* 6,499.66** L' ’ rERMil:; iSbUliU/FEliS COLLiiCTED REPORT OTR. BPEERPTl-1 DATE OP RON 12/01/97 ** PERMIT FEE REPORT •• CITY OF ORONO FROM ll/Pl/97 TO 11/30/97 NOVEMBER 1997 BUILDING MECHANICAL PLUMBING SEWER fit Water USER BASE PEE 27,249.47 2,661.99 1,840.63 12,510.00 305.00 PLAN REVIEW 16,665.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 1,946.45 96.52 59.88 13.50 1.50 Lie. SEARCH PEE 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SAC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 284.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAIL IN 43.60 10.50 1.50 1.50 ESCROW 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 46,145.59 2,802.11 1,711.01 12,525.00 308.00 REPORT NBR. BFBERPTl-1 DATE OP RUN 12/01/97 I'bKMlT FEE RFreWT **t*. CITY OF ORONO FROM 11/01/97 TO 11/30/97 PAGE! 47 REQUESTER: LIN SIGN 35.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35.00 FIRE 187.50 0.00 7.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 198.50 PAGE: 48 REQUESTER: LIN REPORT TOTAL BASE PEE 44,589.59 PLAN REVIEW 16,665.17 SURCHARGE 2,125.35 LIO. SEARCH PEE 0.00 SAC 0.00 INVESTIGATION 284.50 DEPOSIT 0.00 MAIL IN 58.60 ESCROW 0.00 PFRMIT TOTAL 63,V?’ M OWNER LAST NM VALUATIONEIDEN312,223.72365,734.52400,000.00MCGUIRE700,000.00POLANSKY80,000.00WOODHOUSE90,000.00SHOLL110,000.00WINSLOW50,0!jC.00 LUNDELLI 58,500.00 OTTO 195,000.00 JACK 19,240.00 SIGEL 25,000.00 HUMPHREY 30,000.00 MEAKINS 3,500.00 DEHAVEN 6,800.00 LARSON 35,000.00 WEILAND 4,800.00 NEGLEY 7,500.00 PYLE 1,100.00 WINSTON 2,865.00 RYERSE 800.00 BRUSTAD 14,000.00 HUTTON 1,800.00 NORWOOD 3,050.00 KROGNESS 16,500.00 JONES 7,000.00 PYLE 1,000.00 SILL .00 DUNCAN .00 NELSON .00 10,000.00 350,000.00 34,000.00 RUDD 3,000.00 MEY 5,781.75 BREHN 21,000.00 SAMS 22,000.00 JACK 182,100.00 HAGBERG 8,400.00 KIERNAN 700,000.00 HALLQUIST 12,000.00 15,000.00 DAYTON 3.650.00 12,900.00 9.200.00 POST 1,700.00 OPEIM 2,300.00 ST LAWRENCE 1,200.00 1,300.00 01 2933 CASCO POINT RD012425THOROUGHBRED LA012425THOROUGHBRED LA014109HIGHHOOD RD011760SHADYWOOD RD01425HUNTER PASS 01 2697 ETHEL AVE 01 1230 SPRUCE PL 01 2995 DEER RUN TR 01 801 FERNDALE RD N 01 425 HUNTER PASS 01 1525 6TH AVE N 01 1895 FOX RIDGE RD 02 690 BROWN RD N 02 3211 BAYSIDE RD 02 3555 FREDERICK ST 02 790 NORTH ARM DR 24 2135 6TH AVE N 24 25 CYGNET PL 24 1220 LAKBVIEW AVE 24 996 NORTH ARM DR 24 140 BROWN RD S 24 1245 6TH AVE N 24 2205 ABINGDON WAY 24 4385 CHIPPEWA LA 24 755 FERNDALE RD N 24 2240 DEVIN LA 24 540 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S 29 1185 LOMA LINDA AVE 29 1270 ARBOR ST 29 3090 NORTH SHORE DR 39C 01 480 OLD LONG LAKE RD 01 25 CYGNET PL 01 425 HUNTER PASS 01 2525 THOROUGHBRED LA 01 4108 HIGHWOOD RD 01 1185 LOMA LINDA AVE 01 790 NORTH ARM DR 01 4685 TONKAVIEW LA 01 465 HUNTER PASS 01 2425 THOROUGHBRED LA 01 2405 DUNWOODY AVE 02 3386 SHORELINE DR 02 430 BROWN RD S 02 300 6TH AVE N 03 290 WOODHILL RD 10 1025 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N 24 1098 LOMA LINDA AVE 24 2625 NORTH SHORE DR 24 1205 LOMA LINDA AVE MON, DEC 1, 1997, 2:27 PMPERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER 1997 PERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET PAGE 334651513192515251020 1900 1513 1525 1925 1803 1020 1830 1830 400 1800 250 1800 250 2520 2605 1820 2405 2425 1820 1450 1500 1450 1500 1487 1487 790 1489 1489 3115 4685 908 1802 1965 3211 500 1580 980 2965 2525 507 2380 1485 SHORELINE DRBAY RIDGE RD COUNTRY CLUB RD BAY RIDGE RD BROWN RD N LAKEVIEW TER BAY RIDGE RD BAY RIDGE RD COUNTRY CLUB RD LAKEVIEW TER BROWN RD N LAKEVIEW TER LAKEVIEW TER OXFORD RD LAKEVIEW TER CYGNET PL LAKEVIEW TER CYGNET PL THOROUGHBRED LA THOROUGHBRED LA LAKEVIEW TER DUNWOODY AVE DUNWOODY AVE LAKEVIEW TER BRACKETTS POINT RD BRACKETTS BRACKETTS BRACKETTS POINT RD SHORELINE DR SHORELINE DR NORTH ARM DR SHORELINE DR SHORELINE DR NORTH SHORE DR TONKAVIEW LA DAKOTA AVE LAKEVIEW TER COUNTRY CLUB RD BAYSIDE RD TONKAWA RD POINT RD POINT RD BOHNS PT RD TONKAWA RD CASCO POINT RD THOROUGHBRED LA FERNDALE RD N SHADYWOOD RD 6TH AVE N ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION97/11/12 OR-009675 0000000097/11/0397/11/0397/11/0397/11/04 97/11/04 97/11/05 97/11/05 97/11/05 97/11/05 97/11/05 97/11/06 97/11/06 97/11/07 97/11/10 97/11/12 97/11/12 97/11/12 97/11/14 97/11/14 97/11/14 97/11/17 97/11/17 97/11/17 97/11/20 97/11/20 97/11/20 97/11/20 97/11/20 97/11/20 97/11/21 97/11/25 97/11/24 97/11/25 97/11/25 97/11/25 97/11/25 97/11/25 97/11/24 97/11/21 OR-009620OR-009622OR-009623OR-009642 OR-009643 OR-009644 OR-009645 OR-009646 OR-009647 OR-009649 OR-009651 OR-009652 OR-009665 OR-009666 OR-009678 OR-009679 OR-009680 OR-009687 OR-009688 OR-009693 OR-009694 OR-009695 OR-009698 OR-009707 OR-009708 OR-009709 OR-009710 OR-009711 OR-009712 OR-009718 OR-009730 OR-009744 OR-009747 OR-009750 OR-009753 OR-009754 OR-009755 OR-009746 OR-009721 97/11/05 97/11/05 97/11/04 97/11/10 97/11/21 97/11/12 97/11/21 OR-009200 OR-009201 OR-009614 OR-009616 OR-009231 OR-009672 OR-009720 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 24722316 54793364 54793364 54775649 54775649 24720805 00000000 24722316 547911* ^;9 00000000 00000000 54775649 24461495 57237155 57237155 00000000 12026361 12026361 54775649 54734300 54734300 54734300 54734300 00000000 24461495 29337717 24461495 00000000 24461495 29337717 54775649 54775649 54775649 29338600 24724959 84450649 84450649 00000000 85718672 14753330 00000000 14789529 COX COPPIN PLBG INDEPENDENT SEPTIC SYSTEMS INDEPENDENT SEPTIC SYSTEMS RITTER EXCAVATING RITTER EXCAVATING ALS MASTER PLUMBING COPPIN PLBG INGELSIDE ENGINEERING RITTER EXCAVATING WIDMER INC CLOVER HILL COMPANY INC CLOVER HILL COMPANY INC BERGQUIST ENTERPRISES BERGQUIST ENTERPRISES RITTER EXCAVATING SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICE SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICE SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICE SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICE WIDMER INC THOMPSON PLBG WIDMER INC ANDERSONFREDEENSVEEGGENKIRBY KOSCIOLEK ANDERSON SVEEGGEN FREDEEN SUNDEEN KIRBY OWINGS MYLAN CARTER GORDER BROWNLEE GORDER BROWNLEE EIDEN EIDEN SWANSON WALTON WITHER SWANSON REED REED REED REED WAADE WAADE WIDMER INC THOMPSON PLBG RITTER EXCAVATING RITTER EXCAVATING RITTER EXCAVATING HIGHVIEW PLBG WESTONKA MECH CONTRACTORS BERINGAUSE BERINGAUSE WAADE KNUTSON ANDREASON CONNOR ROBBINS NELSON ABLE SPRINKLER ABLE SPRINKLER IRRIGATION DOCTOR LAUER HOMES, INC. KOVACEVICH DIRR ROZEBOOM BAAKEN SAJJADI O'SULLIVAN G L CONTRACTING INC .00 MON, DEC NUMERICALPERMIT NBR 4,215,906.99* OR-009200OR-009201OR-009202OR-009231OR-009344OR-009553OR-009571 OR-009601 OR-009614 OR-009616 OR-009618 OR-009620 OR-009621 OR-009622 OR-009623 OR-009624 OR-009625 OR-009626 OR-009627 OR-009628 OR-009629 OR-009630 OR-009631 OR-009632 OR-009633 OR-009634 OR-009635 OR-009636 OR-009637 OR-009638 OR-009639 OR-009640 OR-009641 OR-009642 OR-009643 OR-009644 OR-009645 OR-009646 OR-009647 OR-009648 OR-009649 OR-00965C OR-009651 OR-009652 OR-009654 OR-009655 OR-009656 OR-009657 OR-009658 OR-009659 OR-009660 OR-009661 OR-009662 OR-009663 MON, DEC 1, 1997, 2:26 PM PAGE 1NUMERICAL LISTING NOVEMBER 1997PERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET WORK ID NUMBER COMPANYOR-009200OR-009201OR-009202OR-009231OR-009344OR-0095S3OR-009S71OR-009601OR-009614 OR-009616 OR-009618 OR-009620 OR-009621 OR-009622 OR-009623 OR-009624 OR-009625 OR-009626 OR-009627 OR-009620 OR-009629 OR-009630 OR-009631 OR-009632 OR-009633 OR-009634 OR-00963S 97/11/0597/ll,'0597/11/1297/11/219*»/ll/0597/11/0397/11/1097/11/1497/11/04 97/11/10 97/11/03 97/11/03 97/11/03 97/11/03 97/11/03 97/11/03 97/11/10 97/11/10 97/11/05 97/11/04 97/11/04 97/11/04 97/11/04 97/11/04 97/11/04 97/11/04 97/11/04 1580980190050715525202605262529652525 1399 1513 690 1925 1525 335 4100 3300 1595 2135 25 300 1220 996 140 3309 3386 OR-009636 97/11/06 N 465 OR-009637 97/11/04 N 480 OR-009638 97/11/04 N 480 OR-009639 97/11/04 N 25 OR-009640 97/11/04 N 1420 OR-009641 97/11/04 N 1835 OR-009642 97/11/04 N 1020 OR-009643 97/11/04 N 1900 OR-009644 97/11/05 N 1513 OR-009645 97/11/05 N 1525 OR-009646 97/11/05 N 1925 OR-009647 97/11/05 N 1803 C«-009648 97/11/05 N 200 OR-009649 97/11/05 N 1020 OR-009650 97/11/06 N 430 OR-009651 97/11/06 N 1830 OR-009652 97/11/06 N 1830 OR-009654 97/11/06 N 1360 OR-009655 97/11/06 N 425 OR-009656 97/11/12 N 1320 OR-009657 97/11/10 N 725 OR-009658 97/11/10 N 415 OR-009659 97/11/13 N 1185 OR-009660 97/11/07 N 1005 OR-009661 97/11/06 N 2525 OR-009662 97/11/07 N 4108 OR-009663 97/11/07 N 1966 BOHNS PT RD TONKAWA RD FOX RIDGE RD FERNDALE RD N HEAR LA N THOROUGHBRED LA THOROUGHBRED LA NORTH SHORE DR CASCO POINT RD THOROUGHBRED LA PARK DR BAY RIDGE RD BROWN RD N COUNTRY CLUB RD BAY RIDGE RD OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD WATERTOWN RD BAYSIDE RD BOHNS PT RD 6TH AVE N CYGNET PL 6TH AVE N LAKEVIEW AVE NORTH ARM DR BROWN RD S CASCO CIR SHORELINE DR HUNTER PASS OLD LONG LAKE RD OLD LONG LAKE RD CYGNET PL SHORELINE DR SHADYWOOD RD BROWN RD N LAKEVIEW TER BAY RIDGE RD BAY RIDGE RD COUNTRY CLUB RD LAKEVIEW TER TRUFFULA TR DROWN RD N BROWN RD S LAKEVIEW TER LAKEVIEW TER VINE PL HUNTER PASS REST PT CIR 6TH AVE N DEBORAH DR LOMA LINDA AVE HERITAGE LA THOROUGHBRED LA HIGHWOOD RD SlUVDYWOOD RD 844506498445064914786502147533'.0188886111559025115590251133906740000000085718672 19207875 00000000 24738793 00000000 00000000 14719065 00000000 18734372 14796246 35378491 39203800 38819000 34791600 39414211 34484769 14721005 24725920 14040600 24231144 24231144 29383933 12026361 00000000 00000000 24722316 54793364 54793364 54775649 54775649 25334357 24720805 14751160 00000000 24722316 00000000 29332521 00000000 00000000 14987844 13050625 14700700 25354277 00000000 00000000 ABLE SPRINKLER ABLE SPRINKLER STEPHENSON CONSTRUCTION LAUER HOMES, INC.BANNER ROOFING EIDEN CONSTRUCTION INC EIDEN CONSTRUCTION INC MCNULTY CONSTRUCTION COIRRIGATION DOCTOR AWAD t KOONTZ CITYVIEW PLBG & HTG INCLINE ENTERRISES PIONEER CONSTRUCTION DEAN VOSS CONSTUCTION SUPERIOR CONTR INC CRONSTROMS HTG & AC INC SEDGWICK HTG k AC CO COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C KLEVE HTG k AC CARVER HTG k A/C INC DRS HOME REPAIR k REMODEL OLSON LARRY JYLAND DEVELOPMENT GENZ-RYAN PLUMBING GENZ-RYAN PLUMBING HOPKINS PLUMBING k OWNER LAST NM VALUATIONDIRR .00POLANSKY80,000.00SAJJADI.00WINSTON2,865.00EIDEN312,223.72365,734.52WOODHOUSE90,000.00ROZBBOOM.00BAAKEN.00 SIGEL 25,000.00 ANDERSON .00 CALIHAN 3,100.00 FREDEEN .00 SVEEGGEN .00 RYERSE 800.00 SHOLL 110,000.00 HUMPHREY 30,000.00 WINSLOW 50,000.00 VALITON 1,800.00 SHAUGHNESSY 4,200.00 DAYTON 3,650.00 SCHNOOR 1,900.00 HEIDRON 3,300.00 COLEMAN 1,830.00 BRUSTAD 14,000.00 k HTG k HTG HTG BERGQUIST ENTERPRISES COPPIN PLBG INDEPENDENT SEPTIC SYSTEMS INDEPENDENT SEPTIC SYSTEMS RITTER EXCAVATING RITTER EXCAV^ATING PLYMOUTH PLUMBING ALS MASTER PLUMBING TAYLOR KATHERINE SHAUGHNESSY SILL HUTTON KIRBY KOSCIOLEK ANDERSON SVEEGGEN FREDEEN SUNDBEN COPPIN PLBG KIRBY BRBHN OWINGS MYLAN NORWOOD THOMPSON PLBG MEAKINS EBERT CONSTRUCTION JOHNSON k JOHNSON BLDG CO LAKESIDE POOL AND SPA INC. TIMS QUALITY PLUMBING HALLQUIST SAMS LARSON BAAKEN THEIS WEILAND 500.00 400,000.00 12.900.00 15.900.00 2.500.00 .00 1.800.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 9,200.00 .00 21,000.00 .00 .00 050.00 500.00 500.00 000.00 000.00 000.00 000.00 500.00 2,000.00 4,800.00 MON, DEC 1 NUMERICAL LPERMIT NBROR-009664OR-009665OR-009666OR-009667OR-009668OR-009669OR-009670OR-009671 OR-009672 OR-009673 OR-009674 OR-009675 OR-009676 OR-009677 OR-009678 OR-009679 OR-009680 OR-009681 OR-009682 OR-009683 OR-009684 OR-009685 OR-009686 OR-009687 OR-009688 OR-009689 OR-009690 OR-009691 OR-009692 (Xl-009693 OR-009694 OR-009695 OR-009696 OR-009697 OR-009698 OR-009699 OR-009700 OR-009701 OR-009702 OR-009703 OR-009704 OR-009705 OR-009706 <»-009707 OR-009708 OR-009709 OR-009710 OR-009711 OR-009712 OR-009713 OR-009714 OR-009715 OR-009716 OR-009717 Ssss 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 OWNER LAST NM VALUATIONKROGNESS16,500.00CARTER.00GORDER.00POST1,700.00BREHM4,500.00O'MALLEY 4,500.00GOUNTANIS500.00NEGLEY7,500.00O'SULLIVAN .00NELSON.00 3L0,000.00 COX .00 SAMS 1,500.00 RUDD 3,000.00 BROWNLEE .00 GORDER .00 BROWNLEE .00 5,000.00 WOODHOUSE 6,800.00 SAMS 1,200.00 OPEIM 2,300.00 LUNDELLI 58,500.00 OTTO 195,000.00 EIDEN .00 EIDEN .00 JACK 182,100.00 DEHAVEN 6,800.00 34.000. 00 15.000. 00 SWANSON .00 WALTON .00 WITHER .00 ST LAWRENCE 1,200.00 MEY 5,781.75 SWANSON .00 LUNDELL 1,200.00 1,300.00 FINNEY 6,500.00 DUNCAN .00 HAGBERG 8,400.00 FULLERTON 3,200.00 GALLISTEL 2,200.00 ANDERSEN 2,400.00 REED .00 REED .00 REED .00 REED .00 WAADE .00 WAADE .00 KIERNAN 700,000.00 MCGLYN 2,825.00 JONES 7,000.00 EIDEN 1,000.00 11 “'0.00 MON, DEC 1, 1997,' 2:26 PMNUMERICAL LISTING NOVEMBER 1997PERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET PAGE 3WORK ID NUMBER COMPANYOR-009718 OR-009719 OR-009720 OR-009721 OR-009722 OR-009723 OR-009724 OR-009726 OR-009727 OR-009728 OR-009729 OR-009730 OR-009731 OR-009732 OR-009733 OR-009734 OR-009735 OR-009736 OR-009737 OR-009738 OR-0097^3 OR-009740 OR-009741 OR-009742 OR-009743 OR-009744 OR-009746 OR-009747 OR-009749 OR-009750 OR-009751 OR-009753 OR-009754 OR-009755 OR-009756 OR-009757 OR-009758 OR-009759 OR-009760 li 14 7C 97/11/2197/11/2197/11/2197/11/2197/11/2197/11/2597/11/2197/11/2197/11/2197/11/21 97/11/24 97/11/25 97/11/24 97/11/21 97/11/24 97/11/24 97/11/24 97/11/24 97/11/24 97/11/24 97/11/24 97/11/24 97/11/24 97/11/24 97/11/24 97/11/24 97/11/24 97/11/25 97/11/25 97/11/25 97/11/25 97/11/25 97/11/25 97/11/25 97/11/26 97/11/26 97/11/26 97/11/26 97/11/26 NORTH ARM DR WOODHILL RD 3 6TH AVE N5'. j TONKAWA RD242S THOROUGHBRED LA4109 HIGHWOOD RD1760 SHADYWOOD RD425 HUNTER PASS2697 ETHEL AVE3548 IVY PL 3580 WATERTOWN RD 1489 SHORELINE DR 1230 SPRUCE PL 2995 DEER RUN TR 1245 6TH AVE N 2205 ABINGDON WAY 801 FERNDALE RD N 425 HUNTER PASS 790 NORTH ARM DR 4385 CHIPPEWA LA 1525 6TH AVE N 755 FERNDALE RD N 2240 DEVIN LA 540 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD 1895 FOX RIDGE RD 1489 SHORELINE DR 3211 BAYSIDE RD 3115 NORTH SHORE DR 4685 TONKAVIEW LA 4685 TONKAVIEW LA 465 HUNTER PASS 908 DAKOTA AVE 1802 LAKEVIEW TER 1965 COUNTRY CLUB RD 2425 THOROUGHBRED LA 2405 DUNWOODY AVE 300 6TH AVE N 1205 LOMA LINDA AVE 3548 IVY PL 29337717148202051478952924724959342836773757620035378491353391293537849114761012 14730378 24461495 34987883 38940005 39296767 39203800 39414211 39414211 39414211 35421166 35421166 35421166 34791600 34791600 39296767 00000000 29338600 24461495 29337717 29337717 29337717 54775649 54775649 54775649 24432921 24724456 24701208 24490147 00000000 THOMPSON PLBG WINDSOR LANDSCAPES G L CONTRACTING INC WESTONKA MECH CONTRACTORS HEATING St COOLING TWO BLAINE HTG AC St ELEC INC SUPERIOR CONTR INC A St E MASONRY SUPERIOR CONTR INC NEDDEAMEYER JEFF RIGHT ANGLE BUILDING CORP WIDMER INC MASTER HTG St COOLING BURNSVILLE HEATING CO VOGT FRED St CO CRONSTROMS HTG St AC INC KLEVE HTG St AC KLEVE HTG St AC KLEVE HTG St AC FLARE HTG St AC FLARE HTG S. AC FLARE HTG St AC COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C VOGT FRED St CO HIGHVIEW PLBG WIDMER INC THOMPSON PLBG THOMPSON PLBG THOMPSON PLBG RITTER EXCAVATING RITTER EXCAVATING RITTER EXCAVATING SOUTHWEST METRO PLBG DONAHUE PLBG St HTG STEINKRAUS PLBG INC CUSTOM PLUMBING, INC. OWNER LAST NM VALUATIONMCGUIRE700,000,00NELSON.00.00APPLEBAUM5,000.002,400.00BRINER1,900.00AMUNDSON6,785.002,000.00PYLE1,000.00 JACK 19,240.00 BERINGAUSE .00 MOE 7,300.00 DENERO 30,000.00 1,190.00 BRUCE 3,800.00 HELLRUNG 19.500.00 12.700.00 PETERSON 7.400.00 2.400.00 CHILDS 10,000.00 4.700.00 2.044.00 FUNK 3,699.00 DAYTON 1,200.00 BERINGAUSE .00 ROBBINS .00 WAADE .00 KNUTSON 12.500.00 .00 18.500.00 .00 ANDREASON .00 CONNOR .00 LARSON 15,850.00 2,500.00 DAYTON 1,500.00 HINRICHS 739.00 PYLE 1,100.00 01 Residence 24 02 Addition 25 03 Garage/Attached 26 04 Garage/Detached ..27 05 Porch 28 06 Deck 29 07 Fence 30 08 Gazebo 31 09 Pool 32 10 Re-side 33 11 Re-roof 3412Tennis Court 13 Sign 14 Dock 15 Shed 16 Demo-Principal Structure 17 Demo-Accessory Structure 18 Move 19 Commercial 20 Institutional 21 Storm Damage Repair 22 1-100 Cubic Yards 23 101 Cubic Yards or More 99 Undefined 9999 Replacing Existing Lifting Principal Residence Well Abandonment Foundation Only Temporary Trailer Renovate/Remodel Accessory Structure Stairway to Lake Retaining Wall Entrance Monuments Tree Removal «. -»j LOCAL USB CODES Undefined •• • •REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OP RUN 12/01/97 PERMIT TYPE User Defined VARIANCE Sub-total Grand-total QTY 0 0* 0** NOVEMBER 1997***** PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO-- CURRENT RANGE - 11/01/97 - 11/30/97 BASE FEE 0.00 0.00* 0.00** VALUATION PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00* 0.00** 0.00 0.00* 0.00** QTY 1 1* PAGE: 1requester: LIN-- PREVIOUS RANGE - 11/01/96 - 11/30/96BASE FEE 570.00 570.00* 570.00** VALUATION 0.00 0.00* 0.00** PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00* 0.00** REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 12/01/97 ***** PERMIT FEE REPORT ***** CITY OF ORONO FROM 11/01/97 TO 11/30/97 PAGE: REQUESTER: LIN USER REPORT TOTAL BASE FEB 0.00 0.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEB 0.00 0.00 SAC 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 ESCROW 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 0.00 0.00 1998 ORQNO MEETING SCHEDULE ■ COUNCIL CHAMBERSKEY1 I 7:00 p.m. Council meeting 2nd & 4th Monday O ^!30 p.m. Planning Commission 3rd Monday 7:15 p.m. Park Commission 1st Monday Other Event X Oflicial Holiday 0 *PLANN1NG COMMISSION - May through October - 1st Tuesday is an alternate meeting date. Adopted: November 24, 1997 1998 January S M T February 1998 S M T W T F S 1 A 3 4 5 6 7 8 ETlO 11 12 13 14 15 X3C0 18 19 20 21 22 g3] 24 25 26 27 28 March S M 1 A 8 I3]1 15 0 17 22t|3 24 29 30 31 May S M T W T 3 Afs) 6 10 np 12^13 17 ® 19 20 24 XgH 27 31 7 14 21 28 1998 F S 1 8 15 22 29 2 9 16 23 30 June 1998 S M T W T F S 3 4 5 6 ^10 11 12 13 17 18 19 20 23 24 25 26 27 30 7 Ill's 14 ® 16 21122123 28 29 July S M 5 ® 15 19 ® 21 22 26l27]28 29 30 31 W 1 T 2 9 16 23 1998 F S X. 4 10 11 17 18 24 25 August S M T W T 2 A01 5 9 D3[Tf'i2 16 Q 18 19 23 gtl 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 6 13 20 1990 F S 1 8 15 22 7 14 21 September 5 M T W 6 XA 9 13 0Wl6 20 © 2\ 23 2715S1 29\30 T 3 10 17 24 1998 F. S 4 5 11 12 18 .19 25 26 October S M T W 4 A0J 7 11 ® i!T 14 18 M 20 21 T 1 8 15 22 1998 F S 2 9 16 23 3 10 17 24 Elue.(LTtOVl 25 ® 27 28 29 30 31 November S M T 1 A T 5 1998 F S 6 7 8 I3]l6 X 12 13 14 15 Q 17\18 19 20 21 22 [g] 24 \25 >«: 2^ 20 28 20 28 29 December 5 M T 1 6 13 20 21 22 A 8 ® 15 W 2 9 16 23 30 T 3 10 17 1993 F S 4 5 11 12 18 19 >0«'26 31 1997 IN THE SW 1/4 OF SEC'. 27-118-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA •tTcHVjW ' •DICKEY' S T \ EDGE OF A---WETLAND-AS '^\ ^ DELWEATEO I . U. 985.5 CONTOUR j UNE (OKW.) i CO <dr I JL 8 0> ^ rN • « .SOUTH LWE OF THE / SW t/4 OF SEC. 27-118-23 -----L._ . «legal oescrption or premises : Thol port of the North 316.80 feet of the South 025.00 feet of the South Holf of the Southwest Quorter lying West of the Eost 990 feet thereof. Section 27. Township 110, Ronge 23. ■ffl —; tw*f^**f r#« C»^9 ^ rorsi. » //./* / -FFWr/ 1 < * 9fftt E. #r sv/iv#r I* e--w I + —44- lake lestCMtuev MiVrSMlN IMrf llTMRiniiiN , • <2>//# f;, Cmta^a 90 i *#»/ • ComN & gronberg, Inc. CviMihiit^ I jhiiI Snrm/or>, Stfc Plmwcrs •! ^*rV^ w.is h\ rm- umL'r mv ilinvl '►upr? Jilit that I jm 4 ifiilv ft*i;isU r<\l C m »l I H|;in<Tr and I .»»ul Survfvof ufnlrr lK»’ liwA »»I Ihr SUtv «*I Mpu>r^»(4 r TO: FROM: DATE: Chair Lindquist and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/Zoning Administrator August 8, 1997 SUBJECT: #2275 Ted and Myma Wolf 900 Willow Drive North Class II Preliminary Subdivision--Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 Acres) 11.76 total acres (6.73 dry buildable) Application:Applicants propose to divide an existing lot into two lots, (front and back) with an access lot. The applicants previously presented a sketch plan for a three lot subdivision (#2203 in January 1997). Applicants were directed to determine the extent of the glencoe wetland. Applicants were also instructed that if three lots were proposed, the private road outlot must be platted to connect to the e,xtension of Outlot B in the Shadowood plat. Pertinent Ordinances: • Section 10.02, Definitions of Backlot • Section 10.03, Subd. 27, Special Standards for Backlots • Section 10.56, Shoreland Management • Section 11.03, Subd. 2, Definitions Definitions Backlot. A lot typically separated from a public or private road by another lot and which gains access to the public or private road via a narrow corridor. Such a separated lot is considered to be a "backlot" when the corridor is platted as an outlot. A separated lot is considered to be a "flag lot" when the corridor is platted as part of the lot. When the corriodor is merely an easement over another lot, the separated lot is considered to be an "easement back lot". U 2275 Ted and Myrna Wolf 900 Willow Avenue Sorth 8.'1 8/97 page—I 1. The proposed subdivision creates one front lot and one backlot. The proposed outlet "A" is platted as a separate corridor. ANALYSIS RRl-B Zoning Standards for Front Lots Dimensional standards for front lots. A front lot created as part of a front/lDack lot division shall meet all zoning district area, width and setback standards, except that the required side yard of the front lot adjacent to the access outlet shall be equivalent to the side street yard requirement for the zoning district. Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Side Yard Side Yard adjacent to street Rear Yard 2 acres 200 feet 50 feet 30 feet 50 feet 50 feet Lot 1 Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Side Yard Side Yard adjacent to street Rear Yard 4.01 acres 287 feet 70+feet 40’ from north property line 150' adjacent to outlot A 490' Lot 1 meets the requirements for a front lot. Special Standards for Back Lots Created After January 1,1994 A. Dimensional standards for back lots shall be as follows; 1. Lot Area shall be 150% of the zoning district requirement. 2. Lot width measured parallel to the front or street lot line at the street yard setback line of a lakeshore backlot, or at the front yard setback line of a nonlakeshore back lot, shall meet the « —• i.i • __-zoning district width requirement. The street yard or front yard for any back lot will be a ^2275 Ted and \tyrna Wolf 900 Willow Avenue North 8/18/97 page—2 III I iifn iiWi^i ii ■mi I ii 111 r yard starting where the narrow access outlet corridor ends and the lot begins. Lakeshore backlots shall meet the lot width standard at the shoreline, at the lakeshore setback line and at the street yard setback line. 3.The depth of the required street yard or front yard shall be 150% of the zoning district from yard requirement. 4. The required side yard and rear yard depths for back lots shall be 150% of the zoning district requirements. The required lakeshore yard of a lakeshore back lot shall meet the zoning distnct lakeshore yard requirements. RRl-B Zon ing Standards for Back l (150% requirement) Lot Area 3 acres Lot Width 200 feet Front Yard 75 ft. Side Yard 45 ft. Side Yard Adjacent to street 75 ft. Rear Yard 75 ft. Lot 2 Lot Area Lot 2 3.4 acres Lot Width 287 ft. Front Yard 90+ proposed Side Yard 50' from south property line Side Yard Adjacent to street Not applicable Rear Yard 230’+ to wetland The proposed Lot 2 meets the minimum 150% requirement for backlots, Access Requirements 1. Access outlots shall be 30' minimum width, and shall be wide enough to accommodate drainage, snow removal and screening without encroachment on neighboring properties. The proposed outlot is 30’ in width and will not cause encroachment onto adjacent pfoperties. a 2275 Ted and \fyrna Wolf 900 Willow Avenue North 8/18/97 page—3 2. The City is to consider requiring both the front and back lot to share a driveway access within the access lot if the Council determines that creating an additional access to the existing street will be a potential safety hazard. Lot 1 currently has an existing house with a circular driveway. The curb cut for outlot A is proposed to be located at least 120' from the southern entrance to the circular driveway. 3. Driveways within a back lot shall be located at least 10' from the side or rear lot lines of adjacent lots. The proposed driveway for Lot 2 will be able to be located at least 10' from the side and rear yard of Lot 1 and the adjacent property to the south. 4. No more than two residences may be served by a driveway located within an access outlot. . Only one residence will be served by outlot A. 5. No access lot may be platted abutting an adjacent access outlot except when the intent is to combine the two access outlots for creation of a public or private road meeting City standards. The proposed outlot A is not located next to an access outlot. Screening Requirement.s 1. 2. Driveways constructed in access outlots shall be adequately screened by fencing or vegetation at the discretion of the City, at all points to the rear of the required street yard of the front lot, so as to eliminate intrusion of vehicle headlights into the side or rear yard of adjacent lots. The applicants have not submitted a landscaping plan for the outlot. The Planning Commission shall direct the applicant to screen the driveway in the outlot. The street yard of the back lot shall be adequately screened by fencing or vegetation at the discretion of the City, so as to eliminate intrusion of vehicle headlights into the side or rear yards of adjacent lots. The applicants have not submitted a plan indicating how the street yard of the back lot shall be screened. The Planning Commissichshall direct the applicant to screen the street yard of the back lot. # 2275 Ted and Myrna Wolf 900 Willow Avenue North 8/18/97 page —4 Septic Septic tests confirm that soils are suitable to support a five bedroom mound system on Lot 2. The septic system location will meet all necessary setbacks from property lines, structures and wells. DrainageAVetlands The land generally slope downward towards Dickeys Lake. Approximately .4 acres of wetland has been delineated to the west of the lake. The dry buildable area of Lot 2 is sufficient to build a residence at least 26' from the wetland. Park Dedication The City Assessor is reviewing the proposal to determine the value. The Park Commission will require the 8% dedication fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval following the Planning Commission's directions to the applicant regarding: 1.Screening along the outlot and along the rear property line of Lot 1 which is the front yard for Lot 2. 2. Retention of the loop driveway on Lot 1. Attachments A B C D E F G H Application Plat Map Preliminary Plat Tcpo Map Septic Report Assessor's Findings (to be insefted when received) Minutes from Sketch Plan Resolution ^2880 re: Outlot through Shadowood H 2275 Ted and Myrna Wolf 900 Willow Avenue North 8/18/97 page —5 ■Hk»' OCATioU MAf im bEE MAP 48 <0.m 1 1 •. 111111 ^ -rl3 iftA c*va wwr 90O DfI(/< NJorK^ ■f i: : I !il ! I V I r oo >i Application # ^Sl'7‘=>A Date Received n 7 Amount Paid VOO • ___ CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Siteaddress _____UJiLuivo D<2.\VC. ^ ORtmo Property Identification Number (PID) P~? |V^ S3 OQQt Please check one - Property ____abstract or torrens? Attach legal description to application. APPLICANT Name I e.P A- (Astt-tn. \AJ6if Address Lv-1UL^L^\^3 City Phone (home) 4T3-^<p3 O Zip55'3ft Phone (work) £R (if different than applicant). C^IvvivAoT Nam e fW \ V< e 1-Vl \ City O ______yV\>^ Phone (home) ^ Pfe 1 (attach list if more than one) ZipSSBSWPhone (work) 47Ct> - S'5 3 5 EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size / Present use (check)X Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (specify)______ Present Zoning District PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes __________ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (nd new buildling sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites / Existing Units 7 _ New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) Units per //.*^^cres Sq. Ft. Dry Buildable Land XT Residential ______ Other (specify)_________ h O O \Application ff A *j * »^**-' Date Received n /<^7 Amount Paid ^VOO •_____ CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION OR^sno Property Identification Number (PID)__.3T |te- 33 Please check one - Property ____abstract or torrens? Attach legal description to application. applicant Name ' C P A. \Molf Address \^LAdiftA)— rity pr\Al------------------- CR (if different than applicant). Cov>c1J^T ^ X v<. l-Vi \ Phone (home) 4*^3- ^^3 ^ Zip^^i^hone (work) _______ Address ^c^lfOorw v A ca ^Q — ritv O fi^cTwo ^ _____Phone (home) ^ Zip S$3S^Phone (work) V7(p - S'5 3 g (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use (check) / y/- X Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (specify)______ Present Zoning District IP63 . R ^ 1-^ PROPOSAL iNumber of Building Sites Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (nb new buildlmg sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites /___Existing Units / New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) ________ Units per //.’^^Acres ,^^re.S Sq. Ft. Dry Buildable Land XT Residential Other (specify)_________ n»» a t-frr m ”i»rtA4C.? ------^T->7M—*Vt—V i'k^(^ *«r»i ?r» v* 9 T-F-7 ------ 'SMAOC<^OOD < \ -----—33,? “!**?“«••»-arc- « ♦ \ \ U2) / • • . \W',\‘ •.*.•. V.* '.■.*.'.V «*«•»• «•••••• •••#« 4 4 • k • «< • « • • V « • *t • « • •• • • •• • • « • ■ «••••• :<y.:-:-::- • • • • • • • • •• • • a • ■ • « a^a Iv'.'X • ••••••■«• * • a a • a a a a ■ *a*a*a\ « • aa a a\« a a *a***€ Ji'-'a"a a a I a t a»X i-M' t'a*f*^ **a*a* "a*a*aJa'a'a'a"# - p • - «•! A?//’: ( mmmm j —'55J* mfisni'Wam > .« ■i?nr J'aiJT — 's\l ' ^ I i______ v%j» . t*V ‘3>W>-' ■o) 't •« «n» ffTi ^4 • / C73, \» • 9- '5) K 'ci \ J_ \ ■V \ i i \ \ C A7li|-5^>@) '« X* /I •:-:-:W':’x-;‘ / / J) finr «nst4 iv* i.aaa) \m j 'X- • S] ^5:^ (6) t 1 f > Ji ^ r; r » ^vjl- .•a.*..#!• 1 f 1 'Ti y » i JW '•|tl^» ^naTT (U) , l*‘ \/ •w ---------«aa >4 (.’iJ IN THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 27-118^23. HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ■EYhibif d C wMf #r 5Wiv#r - LAKE LEGAL DESCRPTION OF PREUSES : Thot porl of tha North 316.80 Feet of the South 825.00 feet of the South Holf of the Southwest Ouorter lying West of the Eoet 990 feet thereof. Section 27, Township 118, Ronge 23. •—tfl—/#e«p #/^neiM «* r»r4€ • ii.€ i rrs ^#4-r *r/4<«W 0Mt¥t AT 99ftt IHSlTNft’fV nAAlMM_nL IfVISMIN lUTI IHS( Mll'Tli IN <2>/ye/#»r ^ *0 t 4#f/ .COFFIN & GRONBERG. INC. Loihiiltni^ iiwtihvr>. Lwtt Snnrinfrs, Sift' Pltwiu ’r> I h4‘fi'bv ii rfifv llul lHi\ Miixi \ H.is pfi'i'amf fn mv t*f uiuU'r on itm>l suj'**f viMtin. jihI Ihal tain a duly ft'X*^Uii*d L i% UI anJIaiuI''UfM»\t»» undrr ihr Lima ii| ihtf Suu* *4 KliuiHr^ila , TO:Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/Zoning Administrator FROM:Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager DATE:August 12,1997 SUBJECT: Septic Review for Application #2275, Ted Sc Myma Wolf - Subdivision The proposed two lot subdivision includes soil testing and design for each lot. A new septic system was installed in 1997 for the existing 3 bedroom residence. The existing system can be expanded to a 5 bedroom system and a future site for a 5 bedroom residence is also available. The new lot has suitable area for both primary and alternate sites for a five bedroom residence. All designs meet City and State Standards. Based on the above information, staff recommends approval of the application. E CITY OF ORONO SEPTIC SYSTEM APPROVAL CITY of ORONO Municipal OfRces PostOmc«Box66 CQital Bay, Minnesota 5532.1-0066 • LOCATION: Willow Dr. N.A^o Jdjft OWNER: GENERAL CONTRACTOR: SITE EVALUATOR: s-P SEPTIC CONTRACTOR: The City of Orono has__^Approved .REPORT DATE: 23, 1997 (approved-disapproved) witli the following comments: your on-site system design as of 31, 1997 (date) be issued (o a licensed «plic coVl'inw 'he silepian. Apennit must enciosed. ^ " P"" "> ■'“Wl»Hon. A iisl of currentiy iicensed septic conttactors is <«3^35^-*'Sfor have prior.approval of the ta phce'^lilSsut^dfn^^Ap^^^^^ ““''f'ion and fencing must has verified that primary and alternate sites a?e adtquatefy protretrf.' ““ ‘“P"*!'’” Department remain NO VEHICULAR TRAFFIC OF ANY KIND rrer. » \ of tested drainfield sites cither before or after sLem ^ equipment, etc.) is allowed within 20’ unusabie prohibiting the timeiy compietion and or limlS^ig thTong Z“ A site copy wili be avaiiabie at the City Offices for the septic contractor. CITY OF ORONO Stephen WcTOnan. On-site Systemis Manag<»r TELEPHO iNE-473-7357 • FAX-4734J510 r R I X S-P TESTING, INC.Steven B. Schirmers • MPCA Cert.No. 627 951 Katydid Lane NE • St. Michael, MN 55376 • (612) 497-3566 FAX(612)-497-5011 State License #394 May 19. 1997 Ted Wolff 900 Willow Drive North Lot 2 Orono, Henn. Co., MN JUI 2 5 cnv OF ORONO This on-site sewage treatment system is designed for a Type 1, five bedroom home, in accordance with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Chapter 7080 and local ordinances. The soils on this site are SCS soils mapped - LTB - LeSueur loam. The seasonally saturated soils were located at 12" to 26" (mottled soil). Due to the seasonally saturated soils, a Pressurized Mound System will need to be installed to treat septic effluent. The bottom of the treatment area must be located at least 3' above the saturated soils. The soils at a depth of 12" have a percolation rate averaging 12.7 mpi. A pumping chamber will need to be installed to lift the effluent to the treatment area. The power supply and switches must be located outside the manhole and pumping chamber in a weather proof enclosure. A warning device must be installed with a light and sound device, this Is in case of a pump failure. The manifold and supply line pipe must have back drainage to the pumping chamber. The distribution pipes shall have their ends capped. Be sure the rock and sand fill material are clean. The sod layer below the entire mounded area must be turned over, just break up the sod, be sure not to over work. All neighboring wells are located greater than 100' away from the proposed treatment area. •Af be.ore and after Design is not valid & the system will nepH tn ^fore construction. This praposed for On-Sife «’* treati^ Mptic eSn "^^ivX**"*"**' ^®''® Problem li areas ‘°“®‘«““® due to adding more solids & fine solids passIna Sramht^^ ® recommended, amounts of soaps, cleanina aoentsTrWnSr «Excessive treat septic effluent. AdditiVes are not recommended bacteria needed to your tanks through the manhole by a certlfi^Tim.!fr ^ Pump & clean pumper to set up a schedule ^ ^ Pumper every 2 years. Check with your Steven B. Schirmers r By-htloi' City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55323 Phone: (612) 473-7357 Fax: (612) 473-0510 MEMORANDUM DATE:August 14, 1997 TO:Planning Commission Members FROM:Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Park Dedication Fee for Ted & Myma Wolf, 900 Willow Avenue North The City Assessor called today and has stated that they are valuing the proposed lot at $95,000. The 8% park dedication fee is $7,600. J MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JANUAP.Y 21, 1997 (#7 - #2202 County Road 15 Improvement - Continued) Smith asked what impact the filling of wetlands would have on the wild life in the area. Settles said the reports indicate there will be no impact noting the land is only a Ions, narrow strip. Smith inquired if there would be any detours or rerouting of traffic. She was informed that the construction would be staged such as half the road would be built at a time allowing for on-going two-lane traffic by use of one lane and the shoulder. McMillan questioned the surcharging. Guy Knowlan said the surcharging will make use of a select granular sand, which over an approximate 6 month period of time will compress the air and water out of the material to allow Class 6 and bituminous to be laid over it. The north side would be affected 1.2 meters and driveways will be left lower to accommodate the surcharging. There were no public comments. Gaffron informed Lindquist that the Council is considering a ponding agreement but does not wish to delay the project. Polaczyk noted the construction cooperative agreement between Hennepin County and Orono states such language listing the responsibilities regarding maintenance and funding participation between the County and City. He explained the costs regarding right-of-way and construction as well as the City contribution of the Ferndale Cutoff for mitigation. Schroeder moved, Lindquist seconded, to recommend approval of the CUP and variances for alteration of existing wetlands in conjunction with the reconstruction of County Road 15 from Orono Orchard Road to the eastern border of the City with the recommendation that the Council pursue alternate mitigation sites. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. SKETCH PLAN/CONCEPTUAL REVIEWS (#8) #2203 TED WOLF, 900 WILLOW DRIVE - SKETCH PLAN REVIEW FOR PROPOSED CLASS m SUBDIVISION The applicant was represented by Mark Gronberg and Mike Hilbelink. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 21, 1997 (#8 - #2203 Ted Wolf - Continued) Mabusth reported that the applicant proposes a three lot subdivision of the 8.3 acre property located in the RR-IB Zoning District. The property is subject to the Shoreland Regulations as it is located within 1000 feet of Dickey Lake, an natural environmental lake. Structures and septic drainfields are not allowed within 150' of OHWL at 985.5'. The existing residence within the property currently has access ofif of Willow Drive. Outlot B of the Shadowoods plat to the immediate north was created to provide a future loop road to Willow Drive. The applicant proposes a single driveway is proposed to be installed within the Shadowoods outlot to eliminate impact on vegetation. The subdivision, Shadovvood Farms, is served by a cul-de-sac road 1300 ft in length. This driveway would increase that access from the 1300 ft. to 1600 ft. The code would allow a 1000' length. It wa.s the City's plan to plat and install a future loop road. Mabusth reported that the dry buildable has not yet been determined and will be a factor in whether there is a two or three lot division. Mark Gronberg indicated a wetland delineation occurred about six weeks ago using aerial and field checks. Mabusth noted that the wetland consists of 2 types, PA and glencoe, adding that the soils of the glencoe need to be determined. Gronberg will get the results of the testing to Mabusth. McMillan noted for the Planning Commission that winter testing is not guaranteed and will require further confirmation. If a 3-lot subdivision were to occur. Staff must ask for a future corridor connecting Cox Farm Road with private road in subdivision. If a 2-lot subdivision is proposed, the City may not ask for a platted extension at this time. Mabusth noted that a letter signed by the Sanford's, 945 Cox Farm Road, along with 10 other property owmers of Shadovvood, asked for elimination of Outlot B extension road. Lindquist read the letter into the record voicing concern over access fi’om Outlot B. The residents feel two lots are not an extensive development and the City's right to outlot B does not exist citing safety and environmental impact with the number of maple trees existing in Outlot B. The residents voiced concern over impact to the wetlands and Dickey Lake and prefer an access from the subject property. Gronberg noted the possibility of a loop road. He did not feel they would have to use the driveway and do not wish to connect all the way through for the two lots. He asked for consideration of the 30' outlot for two lots from Willow Drive with Lot 1 using the existing access. Lindquist asked if two curb cuts were possible. Gronberg said there were no sight line problems. Mabusth said this w-ould require input from Greg Gappa, the Director of Public Services. It was noted that the Ringerswoo-^ plat does not have a connecting corridor to north lot line or subject property. r MtHTlNG HELD ON JANUARY 21, 1997 (#8 - #2203 Ted Wolf - Continued) Schroeder asked if the reason for a loop road was for safety purposes. Mabusth said the concern was for safety and this pattern for development is recorded in the Comprehensive Plan. Schroeder asked if the outlot could be developed with a temporary cul-de-sac. Mbelink said the applicant prefers the way the property access is currently laid out and does not propose to extend the cul-de-sac. Schroeder asked if an outlot could serve as a driveway. Mabusth said a 3-lot plat would require a private road. Mabusth questioned the loop drive that serves proposed Lot 1 and the requirement to maintain its use. Lindquist said ideally he would see all access off of the future road outlot. McMillan noted the difficulty of installing the connecting road outlots once development takes place. The roads should be installed prior to development or placed closer to the boundary of the developed site. Mabusth informed Schroeder that there were no standards for driveways. She informed hirn the access serving three units would have to be a private road. Lindquist noted the 50 outlot would still be platted. Schroeder questioned whether there was enough land. Gronberg said there was 3.05 acres to the wetland area. He noted there would be a need for an "S” shape to hook up to the outlot. It was felt there would be adequate land. During pubUc comments. Matthew Sanford, 945 Cox Farm Road, informed the Commission that the property owners of Shadowood were unanimously opposed to the use of Outlot B. He noted that one reason for the purchase of his property was because of the stunnirig maples located there. Schroeder informed him that it was not the intent of the Commission to have to cut down those trees. The Comrmssion discussed the options for access. McMillan noted the need to have the additional information regarding the wetland on Lot 3 in solving access from Willow Drive. Mabusth advise J ,hat the final resolution of the access issue is dependent on the number of residential unics Lindquist noted the need for assurance that there is enough dry buildable land for three b i?. Applicant ’s representatives were informed that if there was a 3-lot subdivision, the 50' outlot must be a private road designed to connect with Outlot B of Shadowoods. The private road could be constructed v«th a temporary cul-de- sac. Mabusth inquired about septic testing. Gronberg informed her that the testing has b completed and all three lots have acceptable sites for septic systems. een Schroeder said he would be inclined to plat a road outlot with a 30’ corridor wth a driveway. Concern was voiced that it would be difficult in the future to divide if the outlot was not platted at 50'. A suggestion was made for a driveway installed within Outlot B that was specifically created as a connection corridor. Sanford asked that Outlot B be stipulated that no driveway would be constructed off of it. His concerns were noted. J r m m .f City of OH.Or^O RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _________ A R2S0LUT20H APPKOVIRG TE2 PLAT CT SSADafOOD FAPJi P1L2 20. 1532 1TH2RZAS, the City of Orono Li e municipal corporation organised and existing under the laws of the State of lticnas-3t.t; and HBBRZAS# the City Council of the City of Orono hes adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, econonuic end safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision of a plat of 13 lots' by Pullerton Properties Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, the subdivider; and HEEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet *11 standards of the RR-lB rural residential zoning district finding that each lot is of a size and configuration that will allow its use as a single family residence to be fully developed.without the need of any variances; and IWHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including* > .. ; i : ■ 1* Completion* of all the requirements of Resolution'#2825, a resolution that granted preliminary approval of the 13 lot subdivision, ' 1 2. Dedication on the plat of rights-of-way for public reads shown as E.C.S.A.H. No.6 and Willow Drive. 3. Dedication easements. on the plat of drainage and utility r 4. Dedication on the plat of drainage easements. Creation of private roads shown on the plat as Outlets B and C. Outlot C to be known henceforth as Shadowood Drive and Cox Pam Rond. Page 1 of 4 fe.'Tf mm y City of OI^OI^TO RES0L'JT!0;V 05 the city council NO. 2380 ^ * • pi^m »“s •i.T; ~ b5;:2f!Si;i®i«''««ts "wL^fn «ch“i,'“ho =='-ta°i aaintaln hi p\y A®/’ ‘"’jenants and agreSn “,V”-? road. poy th* cos*. o£ -■'clr.tena.loo /o;Va!5“J?«iy ^rainajivaysJ^f fola ^°f /l^tationii *cn ®§7. '*?'>''C'*tlonr c«sf‘'®“°" « «*.. outlots for the folio . ?"#Che following approved Out lot A u * ^ i"::::"" ~^‘g sinri..* final plat approval.^'’*** outlets to be constructed upon Execution °h- <=<»• ■"•Cling vith ■“ccA PcUlo\°"c^'-%fl »■■«« Aiir'pi'sfi;?; «111C“ Drl« upgrade of wtiV ^^Sht-of-way uoon a*7*''“*-oo of standards or at whether by-^^ture County Road 116^ based on MSA :*• Execution «# ■r ••;.s K^.Cs.yp ■ - r::;* »\* mmm ii. W^M 'm’tm mm WM . i * *r* • ‘lilW