Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-11-1991 Council PacketAGENDA FOR CODNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, FE3R0ARY 11, 1991, 7:00 P.M f*)Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon request. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. C0Ui\.ROLL CALL 1.CONSENT AGENDA* APPROVAL OF NINDTBS *2. Special Meeting of January 7, 1991 *3. Regular Meeting of January 28, 1991 4.Senior Citizen's Presentation FEe 1 1 1991 OTY OF OROnu PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Sara Moos Representative PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Liait 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT **APPLICANTS**lanediately after the Council has reviewed your application please sign the three (3) original resolutions at the Recorder's desk. Applicants need not execute resolutions for subdivisions, vacations and denials. 5.#1600 Super valu, 3333 Shoreline Drive - Variance/Commercial Site Plan Review - Resolution 6.#1605 Dr. Richard Lindstrom, 1065 West Ferndale Road - Variance - Resolution 7.#1611 Bruce Curtiss, 1920 Fagerness Point Road - After-the- Fact Variance - Resolution 8.#1612 Christopher Dale/Geri Lee Paulson, 4033 and 4105 Watertown Road > Lot Line Subdivision - Resolution 9.#1613 Jensen Homes Inc, 315 Tonkawa Road - Conditional Use Permit Resolution 10.#1615 G. Mroz and K. Hopkins, 59 Ferndale Green - Preliminary Subdivision - Resolution 11.#1616 G. Mroz and K. Hopkins, 59 Ferndale Green - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution *llA. Maureen Steele-Bellows, 265 Brown Road South - Resolution ENGINEER'S REPORT *12. Pay Request Lift Station #8 - 4th and Final Payment *13. Pay Request Well #3 - 8th and Final Payment *13A. Change Order #1 • Lift Station 10 and 43 14.Pay Request #4 - Pumphouse NAYOR/COOHCIL REPORT 15.Council Position Appointment 16.Park Commission Interviews 17.Cable TV App Incment CITT ADMINISTRATOR* r ttEPORT 18.LMCD Comprehensive Management Plan 19.Lakr Use Management and Shoreland Regulations 20.St&.a Water Management • Concept Review I I I AGENDA FOR COONCi:L MEETING SET FOR MONDAYr FEBRUARY 11, 1991, 7:00 P.H. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT - Continued 21. Highway 12 Cor.:idor Selection Police Chief Selection Process Facilities Workshop 1990 Corporate Report Receipt of Donation - DARE Program Compensation Adjustment - Lt. Fritzler Personal Watercraft - Proposed Legislation Reguest for Funding - West Suburban Mediation 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. enter 1991 NatCviCff^and Equipment Bid Award Administrator's information Cigarette Licensing Well f3 (Highway 12) Policy Body Materials Preparation Navscre Heights Ptfcember Receipts and Disbursements Wire Transfers Administrator's Goal Setting CITY ATTOrTEY'S REPORT UCBR8BS (32*) BILLS (33*) ADJ001 DPCOWXEG 18S0ES AMD EVENTS 02/06 - Planning Commission Hwy 12 Workshop 5:00 p.m. 02/11 02/18 02/19 02/20 02/25 02/27 02/27 04/17 04/23 04/23 Council Meeting Holiday - President's Day Planning Commission - Tuesday Planning Commission Hwy 12 Public Info Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Meeting Planning Commission Hwy 12 Workshop 5:00 p.m. LMCD Board Meeting (4th Wednesday) Policy Committee Highway 12 Corridor (3rd Wednesday) Technical Committee Highway 12 Corridor (4th Tuesday) Citizens Committee Highway 12 Corridor (4th Tuesday) Navarre Heights Drainage - delayed to 3/25 at "applicant request. Notices being sent to residents. PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO IL / LJ HA/V^ MEETING DATE n iu PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 3. MINUTES OP THE SPECIAL ORONO COUNCIL MEETING rpo < - HELD JANUARY 7, 1991 1 1 1991 A special Orono Council meeting was convened at Mayor-elect Barbara Peterson. Present at the roll call were Mayor-elect Barbara Peterson, Council member-elect Diann Goetten, Council member-elect Gabriel Jabbour, and Council member Edward Callahan. Following roll call the members-elect were sworn in by Dorothy Hallin, City Clerk. Following the swearing in. Mayor Peterson indicated the meeting was to solicit ideas that each of the Council member may have regarding the upcoming year and that this meeting presented an opportunity to discuss those ideas with other Council members and staff. Information to the Community - Several indicated an interest in a regular news letter to be transmitted either on a monthly or quarterly basis to the Community together with a continuation of the Mayor article format in the newspaper. Additionally discussed as a means communicate with the Cwumunity were the possibility of town meetings to address major issues. Suggested as an addendum through the news letter and Mayor's article were discussions of certain problematic ordinances together with explanation of services to assist individuals in the Community particularly new ones. Facilities - Discussion of this iss*i-« focused on an upcoming workshop, probably in March, together wi^.i determining the level of Interest that facility committee members may have once the scope of their continued work could be defined at that workshop. Additional issues related to that were discussed included financing, referendum, space size, bonds and the upcoming option. It was pointed out that there was a definite need as this issue goes forward that this information be accurately portrayed in context for both analysis purposes and presentation to the public. Highway 12 Corridor Study - Council generally discussed the issue including the various solutions or corridors that have been presented together with the impact of a "no-build" alternative. Additionally discussed were the roles of each of the committees and the need for a charge particularly for the Citizens' Committee members. Consultant/Staff - The roles of City attorney and City engineer were discussed and it was requested to relate to those individuals of the desire on the part of the Council members for more input when they (i.e. attorney and engineer) feel it appropriate to speak. They add'tionally requested that while they are the decisions makers, they are not always the experts and requested that the information be presented in lay terms in order to best understand the issues and choices in front of the Council. u k i I i t CITY COnNCII. MEETING HELD ON JMHIWIY «r 1991 Pol lev Body - InforTnation Presentation - Council indicated the desire to have the Council packets presented to them earlier M . ^ _ __ _ _ _^ e* A .Q^ATr innxcduGCi111 the week than the current Thursday deadlines. Staff indicated that it would work to see what improvements could be made to that process and would be reporting back to Council at a future date. Lake Minnetonka Conservation District - The Council discussed the issues currently related to the comprehensive plan and also the shoreland regulations and after discussion, strategy related to those directed Council members Callahan and Jabbour together with Administrator Bernhardson to work in those directions• After discussion of other miscellaneous issues, the meeting on a motion by Council member Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, the meeting was adjorned at 5;50 p.m. Ayes 4, nays 3. Attest: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor council MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETIIWq - ^ HELD JANUARY 28, 1991 ^ ^ W1 ROLL CALL Cinr OF ORONO The Council n;iet on the above date -.vith the following members present: Mayor Barbara Peterson, CounciImeinbers Diann Goetten, Edward Callahan, and Gabriel Jabbour. The following represented the City Staff: City Administrator Mark Bernhardson, Public V^orks Director John Gerhardson, City Attorney Thomas Barrett, and City Recorder Laurie Scheffler. Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. CONSENT AGENDA* Mayor Peterson Consent Agenda. requested the removal of item #16 from the It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Callahan, to approve the Consenv. Agenda, with the e.xception of item #16, which was removed and discussed in the order appearing on the Agenda. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0. Motion passed. INTERVIEWS FOR COUNCIL POSITION Mayor Peterson tr’el'ly e.xpiained the procedure for the applicants to follow and what information the Council would like them to provide. She asked Timothy Pattr’n to make his presentation. Mr. Pattrin stated that he has been ar< Orono resident for the past four years and that he and his wife have two children attending Orono Schools. He said, "My wife and I nave both been active in the community. We volunteered to be baseball coaches and this year we will be co-chairs for the Orono Carnival. I have not been able to attend the Council meetings here because my position with the Wayzata Schc. s requires that I attend their School Board meetings. Those ..c tiinqs "j scheduled for the same night as the Orono Council meeting . If I am the Council’s selection for this position, another person will take my place at these meetings." Mr. Pattrin then reviewed his skills and past experience as presented in his resume. He added that he had produced a two-time National award winning program, "Homework Hotline" that was cablecasted in the area. He also was involved with the early stages of development of the inter-active language course between Orono and Westonka High Schools. With regard to Mr. Pattrin*s interest in serving as a Councilmember he said, "My interest lies in preserving our quality of life here in Orono. I believe that the next few years are going to be the most critical in Orono’s history. We will be making major decisions that will impact every aspect as we know it today." Mr. Pattrin cited the Highway 12 project, Eurasian Milfoil in Lake Minnetonka and defining the role of the LMCD as some of the major issues. He stated that the City is in need of a new facility as they have outgrown the one existing. He added that he would be interested in serving on the Lake Minnetonka - 1 - ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 28, 1991 ifcvi f f - J * COUNCIL CONTINUED Cable iCoiwsOSvlv M: . Pattrin stated that he is concerned v;ith land annexation. taxes, park and recreational areas, the increasing demands on tiie Puolic Works, Police and Administration. Mayor Paterson informed Mr. Pattrin that the Cj.ty does currently have an openi ig for a representative on the Lake Minnetonka Cable Communication Commission and asked if he would be interested in filling that vacancy. Mr. Pattrin replied, "Yer., definitely." Goetten asked Mr. Pattrin if, in lieu of attending Orono Council meetings, he had taken other measures to keep abreast of the City's issues. She also asked whether he had been able to attend any of the Highway 12 Corridor meetings. Mr. Pattrin replied, "I have been in touch with the Building Inspector's office, as well as Michael Gaffron. I nave also had contact with the various members of the Planning Commission. I attended the Highway 12 meeting that took place last V/ednesday and watched another meeting that was shown on Channel 20." Jabbour asked Mr. Pattrin how much time he believed would be necessary to serve the City in this capacity. Mr. Pattrin replied, "That would depend on what the agenda is for each meeting, and with how many subcommittees I would be involved," Mr, Pattrin proceeded to address each of the issues listed in item 13 of the letter the City sent to each applicant. His responses were as follows: Highway 12 Corridor Development; "I believe that this issue is one of the two most important issues Orono will .ace. There is a need to have the upgrade done, but many questions need to be asked and problems resolved before plans are made. We nead to determine the characteristics of the upgrade, freeway or expressway, number of lanes, how far it will extend, etc. It is my opinion that M’.JDOT will locate the corridor in the least expensive, and most straight route. We should have a MNDOT representative present at every meeting to answer all of our questions, we need to consider the impact the corridor will have on the Commercial/industrial Districts, as well as the results of the Environmental Impact statement that will come out later this year. Tne three committees mast exchange information and work together to make decisions." Long Term Street and Transportation Planning; "This is a difficult time to predict what our long term street and - 2 - ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 28, 1991 'r'-- COUNCIL INTERVIEWS CONTINUED transportation planning will ba until we better understand the Highway 12 project. Uith respect to some cf the existing roads, I would like to reduce the speed limit on Willow by Hackberry Park from 40 m.p.h. to 25 m.p.h. when children are present. The intersection of Highway 15 and County Road 51 is also a concern. I believe the time has come to warrant stop lights at this intersection. We also naed to be sure that the traffic lights proposed for Willow and Highway >.2 are installed on or ahead of schedule. The City also needs to focus on County Road 116 and take a stand on that project. The City needs to implement a short and long term plan for mriintenance or replacement of bridges. Even though approximately 6% of the population rides the bus to work, I would like to see consideration given to developing a park and ride lot." Facilities Needs: "I tried to find reasons why wo should not change our present facilities and could only determine that it is paid for. Another facility is needed because the present facility is cramped and inadequate. Additional area is needed if we hire more employees. The existing storage facility is disruptive to the residential area. The Council Chambers is too SBiall for holding public meetings. If another facility is not constructed, I would suggest that Council meetings be held at another facility. The Police facility is small and unsecured. Cars are kept outside when not in use and there is no holding cell for people who are in custody. Sooner or later something will have to done, and the costs only increase. The City must explain in detail why the facilities need tc be upgraded and then perhaps bring the issue to a public referendum. Long Lake is also looking for alternative facility needs. It may be logical to combine our efforts and construct a multi-functional facility.** Lake Use and Management: "I believe the Eurasian Milfoil has reached crisis proportions and we are not making any headway. It is clear to me that the OMR, LMCO and Hennepin Parks are emphasizing recreationil use at the expense of the environment. The overcro%rding of boats on Lake Minnetonka and lack of boating safety is unacceptable. It may be appropriate to begin issuing user permits and use the fees for the permits to harvest Milfoil or find a cure. Harvesting in 19'*0 was a losing battle and I do not believe this is the answer. I think we should give special consideration to the marinas and lakeshore property owners. 1 do not think that Milfoil harvesting should occur in each bay, but rather in the channels and as close to shore as possible. And though we saw the lake level increase, I would oppose any type of ground water pumping to fill the lake if the need ever arises." Cooperation with Other Municipalities: "I have already stated that it will be important for Orono to join forces with surrounding communities with respect to Highway 12. I believe - 3 - 'i- •1' ORONO COUNCIL NEBTING HELD JANUARY 28, 1991 COUNCIL INTBRVIENS CONTINUED that the issue of Long Lake annexing Orono's old sewer plant can be resolved under the leadership of our new Mayor and Council. He nsed to resolve all of the issues that can create hard feelings among neighboring municipalities." Long Term Organizational Planning and Council/Planning Commission Responsibilities i Relationship: "First of all the Council needs to set goals and directions for the various departments of the City. The various departments would then make proposals to Council in response to these goals and objectives. I feel that the City needs to be concerned with the raising of taxes for a new city facility, as well as meeting the requests of other taxing entities. I believe that the improvements need to be done in the building permits and City Ordinances. Some kind of guideline literature -.s needed to explain to Orono residents when various permits are required." There were no further questions from Council for Mr. Pattrin and Mayor Peterson stated that she appreciated the effort Mr. Pattrin put into responding to their questions. She stated that Mr. Hollander had withdrawn his application and asked Mr. ^^illiaro Henney to make his presentation. Mr. Henney stated that he and his wife have lived in Orono for thrse and a half years. He said, "I enjoy living in Orono and plan on staying for a while. Tne notice of this position coincided with a time in my life where I felt the need to become involved with my community. T'lough I have no prior experience in city government, I have been a member of a condominium association board for the past five years. That in itself is a cossBunl^y; as there are approximately 170 people that live in the Opus Condominiums." Mr. Henney briefly reviewed his resume. He Stated that one of his interests in becoming a Councilmember is the development of the Navarre Area. He said, "I do many of my basic business transactions in Navarre. It seems to be an area that will gat, and deserves to get, some additional attention from the City." Mr. Henney next addressed each of the issues in paragraph *3 as follows: Highway 12 Corridor: "I don't believe that the Highway 55 option makes sense. In my opinion, it will not relieve the congestion that now occurs on Highway 12 in Long Lake." "I borrowed a Safety is the Long Term Street and Transportatio:*4 Planning: copy of the Comprehensive Plan from the City, number one concern. I would like to see some attention and money given to developing bike paths. T'lere has been some discussion regarding private versus public roads. l think that ties in with the unique character of the City with urban and rural areas. I - 4 - 0'^ f'l,' . [S:1 ■ . >r<y-r---S' tr K';-. k IMIfe'v:*- ’■' “■y' *Li;r f.' ; pis.. },}&■.< fe^viw : • fo'-'' - ■*Tfv' y-- i r i» p' Uk i • V • m y W OROHO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 28, 1991 COUNCIL INTERVIBNS CONTINUED think the urban areas require more public roadways. Tnis issue should be considered on a case by case basis depending on where the road is located." Facilities Needs; "I think it is inevitable that the City proceed with the process of selecting and designing a new facility. A city such as Orono deserves, and would take great pride, in a new building." Lake Use and Management: "Without a doubt, the most important asset of the City is Lake Minnetnnka. Lake use and management should always be an important part of the City. I should be a number one priority. Preservation, development and recreational quality are important issues." Cooperation with Other Municipalities: "X would encourage it. I think as time goes on there will be more shared services and expenses. Because of our ties due tu Highway 12 and Lake Minnetonka, as well as increases in operating costs, I think it is important that we have good cooperation and communication with other municipalities." Long Term Organizational Planning: "I do not feel qualified to make any specific comments in this regard." Council/Planning Commission Responsibilities a Relationship: ”As a newcomer, I cannot say at this point what needs to be changed." Goetten asked Mr. Honney if he preferred a specific corridor for Highway 12 since he had indicatsd that he did not prefer Highway 5S. Mr. Hsnney replied, "I do not know enough at this point to determine what l believe may be the most preferable corridor, .have only the opinion that Highway 5S will not work because it is too far north to alleviate the congestion on Highway 12." Goetten asked Mr, Hsnney if he has attended any Orono Council meetings or Highway 12 Corridor meetings. Mr. Henney stated that he had btsen unable to attend the Highway 12 meetings, but had been following the issue In the neirspapers. Jabbour asked Mi*. Henney if another Highway 12 corridor. he believed there will be Mr. Henney replied, "I believe there will be a development of a better Highway 12." - 5 - ORONO COUHCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 28, 1991 COUNCIL INTERVIEIfS CONTINUED Mayor Peterson asked M.r. Hsnney what he personally envisioned happening in the Navarre Business District. Mr, Henney replied, ”I have talked with some of the Navarre merchants. It is my understanding that there were different businesses in that area prior to the tornado. It seems that the buildings that now exist were just thrown up after the tornado. I think it is important for that area to have the basic businesses and services that it has now. I do not think the area should expand geographically, but there will be a need to expand the quantity of goods and services generated fro.ri Navarre. It will be necessary to make better use of the land to accommodate the additional businesses and higher density." There were no further questions for Mr. Henney and Mayor Peterson thanked him for his presentation. She then asked Mr. Shull to come forward. M*^. Shull staged that though his formal name is VUllard, he prefers the name l.^ny. He said, "I have been a resident of Orono for 22 years and my wife and I nave a total of 8 children that have attended Orono Schools. I would like to serve on the City Council to give something back to my community. I have worked with Dayton-Hudson Corporation for the past :20 yeairs and am currently the Chief Financial Officer. It is my skill and Knowledge of finance than I can offer to the Council. I believe the City of Orono will continue to face many challenges of fineneing, planning and budgeting of capital expenditures, and re*investment of funds." Mr. Shull reviewed the other infonution included in his resume and respondsd to item in the following manner: Highway 12 Corridor Development: "I sent Council a note regarding my personal feelings on this issue. If I were selected to be on the Council, 1 would have to put my personal feelings aside and represent the needs and wants of the residents. I do believe that wherever the corridor is located, it should not be so large that there are no slowdowns at any point during rush hour traffic. I believe that the Highway 12, long term street, and facilities issues shou.d be addres8>sd by the Planning Conaiesion before Council consideration occurs." Lake Use and Management: "The long term solutions, as with any park system, is going to require cooperation from many communities and government bodies. I believe that the City Council can play an important role in coordinating those efforts." Cooperation with other Municipalities: "Cooperation with other municipalities Is important with the lake issues and planning of infra-structure. I believe that it is essential to - 6 - IMM,, ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 28, 1991 COUNCIL INTERVIEWS CONTINUED have cooperation with the communities to the east, west, north and south. I am most concerned with the financial liability, or lack thereof, in the Navarre and Long Lake area, as we look ahead. We need to consider whether the commercial tax base each has will allow them to be seif sufficient, or if Orono will have to be prepared to take them over.” Long Term Organizational Planning: "If you are referring to the Council Organization, I believe that snouid be viewed in a broader light. Tne Council must work wit. the Planning Commission and School Board. My own feeling is that many of the issues with which the Council deals, could be delegated and perhaps decided by those other bodies, including the City Administrator. I believe that job deserves more authority to decide issues, rather than bringing many of them to the Council." Council/Planning Commission Responsibilities & Relationship; "It is essential to those better defined, at least in the eyes of the members, but more so to the residents of the Community. It is important that the citizens know what the role and responsibility of each body is." Mayor Peterson asked Mr. Snull what issues ha believed should be decided by the City Auministrator, rather than Council. Mr. Snull replied, "I think the City Administrator could deal with decision issues, such as roads, facilities, investment decisions that are within the long range p’an guidelines." Goetten noted that Mr. Shull had attended the mo.st recent Highway 12 meeting and asked if he had any opportunity to attend any other Highway 12 or other City meetings. Mr. Shull replied, "I have been attending the Highway 12 meetings for several months now. I believe we need to get a better understanding of how MNDOT’s decision .making process works." Jabbour asked Mr. Shull what he would recommend the City could do to gain better knowledge of that process. Mr. Shull replied, "I bf^lieve that it up to the Council and City officials to do whatever they can to determine whether this is a decision that MNDOT or the affected communities will make." Jabbour asked Mr. Shull if his business and family schedule would permit him to allocate the time needed to serve as a Councilmember. Mr. Shull replied, "I believe that L will have sufficient time to dedicate to the Council." - 7 - ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 28, 1991 COUNCIL INTERVIEWS CONTINUED Council had nothing further to ask Peterson thanked him for his pres3ntation. i4ary Butler to make her presentation. Mr. Shull aTd M.iyor Mayor Peterson asked Ms. Butler said, "My interest in this Community has been long-standing. I have worked in this capacity before and enjoyed it thoroughly. I have no axes to grind and would like the opportunity to serve again. My attributes that would benefit the City Council now is my past experience. I have kept abreast of the Highway 12, facilities naeds, lake use management, cooperation with other municipalities, long term or ^nizational planning and Council and Plannir»g c<''miiiission responsibilities and relationship via the press and my own past experience." Mayor Peterson stated that Ms. B-tler had served the City for 16 years. Goetten added, "Mary is a former CounciImember and Mayor of Orono." Cabbour asked Ms. Butler why she had decided to come back and lend her services to the City. Ms. Butler replied, "Orono is my home. I vould like to give something back to the Community, because I believe that just in living here I take a great deal from it. I found this to be a most rewarding experience and would look forward to doing it again." Mayor Peterson asked Ms. Butler what she would like to see happen in the Navarre area. Ms. Butler replied, "It is my opinion that with the existing property and business owners, you will not see a great deal of change, unless it can happen without cost. On a low-key level I see painting, landscaping, etc. I do not believe that th» business owners are making enough money to afford much else." Mayor Peterson asked But]it to give her opinion regarding the role of the Planning Commission. Ms. Butler replied, "The Planning Commission was frequently forgotten, which is to the shame of all of us. We should have paying more attention to the Planning Commission and providing them with more guidance. Tney are a great resource, but are not used to their fullest capacity." There were no further questions for Ms. Bjtier and Mayor Peterson thanked her for her interest. She then recognized Bob Minkema and asked him to step forward. - 8 - M ORONO COUNCIL HEFTING HELD JANUARY 28, 1991 COUNCIL INTERVIEWS CONTINUED Mr. Minkema stated that he had grown up in the Orono area and attended Orono schools. He said, "I an a self-employed Certified Public Accountant. My wife and I would like to permanently reside in tnis City and it is my love for the area that compels me to become active in the Community. I believe tnat becoming a member of the City Council will enable me to preserve the quality life that is important to ms and other residents. I '.m highly motivatt*d and dedicated and have demonstrated that by my participation on the City Facilities Committee. I have attended many Council meetings, in addition to the City Facilities meetings, and am impressed with the dedication of the City Council and Staff and their commitment to providing the residents with a comprehensive evaluation of each issue that arises. If selected, I would hope thav I can provide that same quality of service." With regard to the issues outlined in ite.m «3, Mr. Minkema responded as follows: Highway 12 Corridor Davelopment; "I believe if we need to look at safety and environmental issues aid have cooperation between Long Lake and O’-ono to find a compromise that will work for everyone," Long Term Street and T•ansportation Planning; "Safety is most important. It is necessary to consider how the City will finance the construction and maintenance of new roads." City Facilities: "There is no question that there is a need. There is overcrowding and unsafe conditions for Staff. The City’s equipment is being stored in a building that could collapse at any time." Lake Use and Management: "The Lake affects everyone, even those that do not have lakeshore property. Preservation of that natural resource must be a top priority. I don’t believe we should delegate that to any other body." Cooperation with Ocher Mjnicipalities: "I think that we need l*.o have better communication wii-.h our neighboring communities. The cities should have more joint meetings and try to avoid antagonizing one another." Long Term Organizational Planning; "I believe that any planning that is done must encompass the Comprehensive Plan." Council/Planning Commission Responsibilities 4 Relationship: "In the past three years, I have dealt with both bodies. In my opinion, there seems to be a redundancy that exists in the review process of zoning applications. It seems that Council does not readily accept the recommendation from the Planning Commission - 9 - ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 28, 1991 COUNCIL INTERVIEWS CONTINUED and spends time reconsidering all of the issues first considered by the Planning Commission. I believe this to be a waste of the Planning Commission's talents." Callahan asked Mr. Minkema to give nis opinion regarding the Stubbs Bay sewer problem. Mr. Minkema replied, "I reside in the Stubbs Bay sewer area, and appeared before the Council two years ago asking about that very problem. I have had e.xperience auditing and working with other municipalities and school districts. Ten years ago, a sewer project such as this would have qualified for federal financing and state-matching grants. That funding is no longer available. It is obvious, from walking in the area, that there is a problem with the existing septic systems. However, I believe that a $16,000 assessment is a little high just to be able i;o flush a toilet. That does not include connection charges. The value of the homes in that area average $38,000, some are less than that. The City may have to decide whether the houses should continue to exist, and if so, then the City may have to absorb some of the cost of this project." Mayor Peterson's question partained to Mr. Minkema's involvement with the City Facilities Committee. She asked, "Do you feel there is something in particular thfit you did not get from that Committee. Is there any information you would hope to see when the group reconvenes?" Mr. Minkema replied, "In opinion, it seems that all of the Committae members did not feel we were done. There were no further notices or information as to whether the project was being put on hold or would proceed. The papers reported that the price tag had been inflated, yet a site had not been selected and building sire and specifications h-id not been determined. I think we were putting the cart before the horse. Tie estimate is 3.6 million dollars, but we have not seen a plan. How can materials be chosen to equal that amount when the building location is unknown? I wou .d assu.me that everyone on the Cobunittee is anxious to reconvene and continue the planning process." Council had no further questions for Mr. M..nkema. Mayor Peterson thanked him for his presentation and asked Charles Kelley to present his information next. Mr. Kelley stated that he and his wife had moved into Orono in 1978. He said, "I became an Ovono Planning Commission member in 1931 and have served as a member and more recently. Chairman, since that time. The reason I became I involved was because of the rural residential acreage. I wanted to live in a community with my children where we could have outdoor recreation and see - 10 - M'.-. K [I hr ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 28, 1991 COUNCIL INTERVIEWS CONTINUED wildlife. I also b.^lieved that the City would be under great pressure to develop as the years went by. I got involved to help preserve the two and five arre residential areas. I would do everything in my power, if appointed to Council, to adhere to those zoning codes and the Comprehensive Plan. I believe that it is important for Planning Commissioners and Councilmembers to listen to the residents and then formulate decisions. I relieve that listening is very important. The issues Council now faces, in my opinion, are the pinnacle of all the planning Orono has done since 19’’5 aid prior to that. Zoning, municipal sewer, roads, private roads and Highway 12. That is what interests me in the City Council. My attributes a *e that I am young and have two young children growing up through th?.- Orono Schools. I am involved in the Community through athletic and community programs. I get a lot of feedback from residents in the Community as to what they like or dislike, what they would like to see. I also started my own business two years." Kelley's responses to the items listed in paragraph #3 are as follows: Highway 12 Corridor: "I think it is important to listen to the Community first. We are here to represent them first before anyone else. If a particular corridor is proposed, we have to listen to the residents involved in that corridor. I strongly favor residential over commercial. I have always opposed commercial development in Orono. The corridor selection process will be very difficult. In my own opinion, it should left where it is. I believe that a lot of negotiation can be done with Long Lake in that regard.” Facilities Needs: "I definitely think a new facility is needed, though I am not sure about the location. The City has some fiduciary responsibility to tax d*5llars. Tne City is fortunate to have the credit rating ’t has, ani I am adamant that it must be maintained. I oelieve there is a relationship between the City's credit rating and the fact that we have not approved one subdivision based on revenue capabilities." Lake Use and Management: ''I am appalled at what I see other communities doing to wetland areas. I avidly support the protection of wetlands. Lake Minnetonka is our primary resource and the City of Orono has been a leading community in protecting that resource. The City needs to continue to uphold our setback and hardcover standards. I relieve we have not been as strict as we should be.” Cooperation with Other Municipalities; "This is a must. Long Lake is the city that comes to everyone's mind. We must - 11 - '*v I ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 28, 1991 COUNCIL INTERVIEWS CONTINUED work together with the City of Long L=»ke. Due to continued cuts in federal and state funding, it ciay be appropriate to consider joining the two cities. I believe that the issues of facilities needs and Highway 12 have forced us to begin considering that possibility." Council/?lanning Cortf.ission Responsibilities & Relationship: ■’That has been very interesting over the past two or three years. Prior to that, during the Brad V-mNest and M..ry Butler terns, there was more communication between the two entities. There has been a lot of friction in the last two or three years and communication has been poor.” Mayor Paterson asked Kelley if he had any ideas that would help to bring the two entities together. Kelley replied, "I believe you bring them together with trust. The only way you develop trust with people is to talk to them. I think the Council needs to talk to the Planning Commission, explain concepts and the direction in which the elected officials would like to go." Goetton asked Kelley whether it would be possible to compromise his position regarding the location for the Highway 12 corridor. Kelley said, "Yen, definitely. However, I do believe that Orono and Long Lake must get together, no matter where the corridor is located. Perhaps the two cities should be combined. In my opinion, il Highway *.2 is moved off of its present location, there will be extreme pressure for commercialization along that corridor for gas stations, super markets, etc. I believe that the elected officials and Planning Commissioners do not want to see additional commercial development. If the corridor is located north or south, it would be in residential areas and would require a ma^or revision ^f t;ie entire Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Districts." Goetten asked Kelley whether, in his opinion, tho Planning Commission should b«a involved in the Highway 12 corridor selection process, and whether the Planning Commission as a whole wishes to be involved. Kelley replied, "I an happy to be involved in this process and have been involved for some time." Jabbour said, "It appears from your comments that you believe the City has drifted off course over the last years. Is that correct?" Kelley replied, "Ab-olutely. The course was established 12 - r’ f' I ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 28, 1991 COUNCIL INTERVIEWS CONTINUED when the Comprehensive Plan was prepared and adopted, believe in that Plan." I still Jabbour asked Kelley whetner in his opinion, it may be difficult for th* Planning Commission to change roles if the City Council redefines it. Kelley replied, "I believe there are some people on the Planning Commission that do not understand tie role they are being asked to carry out. We have had several new Planning Commission members over the last few years. I do not believe there has been any joint meeting where Council has indicated what they expect of the Planning Commission. As to the Planning Commission's flexibility, I hope they can change. Ti.ese people have taken the time to be involved, and can hopefully be flexible enough to understand the City's direction." Jabbour thanked Mr. Kelley for all af his time he has dedicated to the City. Mayor Peterson stated that Marvin Kramer is also withdrawing his application. She again thanked a. 1 of the applicants for attending the meeting and for their presentations. Mayor Peterson added that Council has a difficult decision to make, but would reach a decision in two weeks. Goetten expressed her appreciation for the applicants interest and efforts and was pleased to see that people wish to become involved. Callahan urged the applicants to seek positions that may be available on the Park Commission, Planning Commission, or other committees, should they not be appointed for tie Council positicn. Jabbour stated that Orono i^ fortunate to have so many quality people interested in serving the Community. APPROVAL OF MINUTES* It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Callahan, to approve the Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting held January 14, 1991. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-9. Motion passed. PUBLIC CONHENTS: Goetten informed the public of an upcoming Hannepin County Property Tax meeting. She said. This will be an information meeting and it is scheduled for February 7, 1991, from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. at the V^ayzata Junior Hign School." Mayor Peterson added, "It Is understanding that the meeting will be a panel discussion, with a town meeting - 13 - I' r Vr ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 28, 1991 PUBLIC COMMENTS CONTINUED atmosphere. I have been told tnat Tad Jude, Gen Olson, Steve Smith and other elected officials wi-1 be present.” ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: #1614 JACK RHODE, 1690 SHADYWOOD ROAD RENEWAL VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2921* It was moved by Goetten. seconded by Callahan, to acopt Resolution #2921, granting renewal of hardcover Variances approved in Resolution #2769. Motion, Ayes-1, Nays-0. Motion passed. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT: PARK COMMISSION APPLICATIONS Bernhardson asked Council if they wished to interview the Park Cominissioneirs that are re-applying. Richard Flint, Susan Wilson, and Jim Gilbert. Mayor Peterson stated that there is no need to interview the persons currently serving, only the new applicants. Jabbour asked if it may be appropriate for Council to have a copy of attendance records when considering ti;e re-appointment of individuals. Council agreed that would be helpful. Mayor Peterson stated that would apply to the Planning Com.mission as well as the Park Commission. OTHER Callahan stated that it has come to his attention that surrounding communities are having new wetland inventories taken. He suggested that Orono do the same. Callahan stated that the City shoula re-examine the issue of landscaping plastic and how it is being used as a bargaining tool to gain structural hardcover. Goetten agreed and suggested that the issue should also be discussed with the Planning Commission. Jabbour suggested scheduling a work session for Council and the Planning Commission no that Council could discuss their position on some of the City's major issues. He said. ”We should try to explain to the Planning Commission what role we believe they should play. Tnere m.ay be some individual: that may not wish to take on that role.” Mayor Peterson asked Charlie Kelley if he could suggest a - 14 - ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 28, 1991 NAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT-OTHER CONTINUED time that may be most convenient for the Planning Commission to meet with Council. Kelley noted that the Planning Commission has scheduled a work session for February 6, 1951 to discuss the Highway -2 issue among themselves, and suggested including the Council. Callahan stated that Council should first meet to reach a consensus regarding their position on the various issues. Council agreed that they would work with Staff and Planning Commission to determine a date to hold the work session. Jabbour stated that the City should be careful to schedule Its meetings so that they do not conflict with the LMCD or Highway 12 meetings. He said, 'I think it is essential for some of us to attend those meetings." CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: STRBBT CONVERSION ORDINANCE «92 SECOND SERIES Bill wear was present and expressed his opposition to this Ordinance. He said, "This is the second time the City has taxen our property without paying us anything. The first time involved easements taken for Old Crystal Bay Road. Now the City is taking property that I am paying taxes on. Is it my understanding that the City is now taking over all private roads?" Mayor Peterson replied, "No, the City is not taking over all private roads." Mr. VJear said, "So the City is discriminating against me and taking just this one." Mayor Peterson asked the City Attorney to respond to Mr. Wear's question. Barrett replied, "Yes, that is correct. It is a form of discrimination, but it is legal." Mr. Wear said, "We* 11 see if it is legal, we're going to test that. We have every intention in the world of getting paid for it." Jabbour clarified, "The City is not discriminating against Mr. Wear, but rather against this particular street." Mr. Wear reiterated that he is paying taxec on this road, which is an outlot. Jabbour said, "Mr. Wear would be relieved of any - 15 - ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 28, 1991 STREET CONVERSION ORDINANCE CONTINUED responsibility of paying taxes on that road." Mr. Wear said, "It is my understanding that I would still be responsible for the road from where it touches our property to the other end. How will the road be maintained? Who is dividing it up?" Bernhardson replied, "The City is going to take over the road completely." Mr. Wear said, "The City is going completely, but will not pay for it. compensated for it." to take over the road I believe I should be Mayor Peterson stated that she had raised the question of compensation to Mr. Wear at the last Council meeting. She asked Barrett to reiterate what his response to her question. Barrett said, "When the land was subdivided, Mr. Wear provided the City with an easement for the road it is now declaring public. When that easement was granted as a condition of the subdivision, Mr. Wear gave up all rights to the property, depending on when the City wantsd to open up the public road. That time may have come, depending on how Council votes on this Ordinance. If Council adopts the Ordinance, it is exercising the property rights it already holds to open the road to the public. That exercise of an existing property right by the City Council, does not require, in my judgment, compensation to someone who has previously held that property as a private road." Bernhardson added, "City Attorney Barrett had also stated at the last meeting that under most normal circumstances, roads in a community are dedicated public at the time of subdivision. is then the responsibility of the subdivid‘d;" to construct the road and turn it over to the City. It is jurt a matter of timing. The City could have taken the road wher !r. Wear's subdivision was completed. T-ie City is not doing anyt,,ing unusual." Ms. Priscilla Elder, 2050 Wear Circle, asked if the City was in fact taking over the maintenance of the road, and, ‘f so, when that would become effective. Bernhardson stated that the Ordinance, if adopted, would become effective once it is published on Monday, February 4, 1991." Ms. Elder stated her, nor her husband, publi:." that aside from those questions, neither had any concerns about the road becoming Mr. Michael Slevert, 85 Wear Lane North, stated that he paid - 16 - . i ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 28, 1991 STREET CONVERSION ORDINANCE CONTINUED for l/6t'n of the road when he purchased his lot and felt that some compensation would be due. Bernhardson e.:plained that in tlie normal s jbdivision process, the subdivider pays for ail public improvements, such as sewer, water, and roads. He said, "Once the subdivision is completed and the improvements are installed, those are then dedicated to the City. In this case, there is no municipal water or sewer. At the time Mr. Wear’s subdivision was completed, the road was to remain private, but the City was granted a public road easement for future use. The City is exercising rights that were given to it and no compensation is due." Cities traditionally do not bear the cost of providing roads to new developments." Jabbour stated that he was sensitive to Mr. l.’ear's comments about his rights being violat«}d and wanted “lo clarify some questions he had. He asked whether any subdivisions could exist without an access road to serve it. Bernhardson replied, "That i? correct. The City's Code would not permit that many lots to be subdivided without a road to serve it." Jabbour asked, "The City requires these roads to be constructed to City standards, isn't that correct? If the City had constructed the road, rather than Mr. Wear, wouldn't it have assessed the cost of construction back to Mr. Wear?" Bernhardson replied, "That is correct. The City's private road standa"^': are equivalent to the standards for public roads." Jabbour asked if it is the City's philosophy to require the road easement to avoid the possibility of creating landlocked properties. Bernhardson replied, "Tha City's philosophy is that private roads be constructed in subdivisions that occur in rural areas. In each of those subdivisions, whether there are two or twenty lots, the City has always taken a public road easement for the future possibility of acquiring the road. The Comprehensive Plan states that private roads should only serve a maximum of ten lots. It is the City's expectation, given the property in this erea, that there will be more than ten lots when it is completely developed. The City is attempting to serve this area with one road, rather than having a several small driveways serving long, narrow properties. Vie are attempting to consolidate the transportation needs away from direct access onto Old Crystal Bay Road." Jabbour stated that there could be a worse case scenario for - 17 - liL ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 28, 1991 STREET CONVERSION ORDINANCE CONTINUED Mr. Wear if the City allowed the road to remain private, yet permitted certain people to cross the road for access purposes, because it would then be Mr. Wear’s responsibility to continue maintaining the road. Barrett agreed, stating that the City had passed an Ordinance in that regard last summer. it was moved by Callahan, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Ordinance #92, Second Series, declaring Viear Lane and Wear Circle public streets and that upon publication. Wear Lane North and Wear Circle will be maintained by the City. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays^'O. Motion passed. LHCD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND SHORELAND REGULATIONS Bernhardson presented Council with updated information "egarding the LMCD's progress with their Comprehensive Plan. Goetten stated that she was appreciative of the information provided by CounciImembers Jabbour and Callahan. Callahan said, "I believe there are still things to be done. The Metropolitan Council indicated to us that it is essential for the various communities to get control of the LMCD representatives. The City of Orono uoes not have that problem, but unless we can get the other cities with a problem over that hurdle the Plan will be ineffective. The LMCD has been stating that the Metropolitan Council has no authority over the Plan. However, the Metropolitan Council does not share that view. Met Council is saying that they have the power to stop implementation of the Plan entirely, as wall as any changes the LMCD may propose. There seems to be a discrepancy." Jabbour was concerned that the LMCD had elected to allow only a 90-day review period of the Plan, yet the cities had requested the Metropolitan Council to allow six months. Bernhardson stated that the time period will in fact be 90 days. He said, "It may be possible to have that period extended for another 90 days." Jabbour said, "It is my understanding that if the LMCD does not get a consensus, the Plan will then be sent to the legislators." Callahan replied, "That is what has been said, but I'm not sure what they will do." Jabbour stated that he does not wish to have the legislature involved with Lake Minnetonka. - 18 - f ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 28, 1991 LMCD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONTINUED Bernhardson said, "I think that may have been the Metropolitan Council's way of telling the local ccmmunitiBs to come to terms, or they will lose what authority tney have." Goettan asked the City Attorney if he had been able to research the issue of the LMCD representative's lerm and what must be done to remove an individual from that position. Barrett replied, "The statutes set forth the length of the term, which is three years. However, the statutes provide nothing for the removal of LMCD representatives." Jabbour said, "I have been reading the DNR's criteria set iorth in their guidelines. I got the impression that all of the adjacent municipalities have f.o approve any diversion. Consequently, 1 concluded that we did not participate with the LMCD in negotiations for the adoption of their Shoreland Regulations. If the LMCD chooses to have their own version, rather than using the boiler plate version, do they have to come to Orono for our approval? i would be interested to know if that is the case." Callahan also asked Barrett to research when the three-year terms of the LMCD representatives began and when they are due to end. There were no further comments regarding this informational item, and Council took no formal action. POLICE CHIEF SELECTION Mayor Paterson indicated that she did not agree with the concept of spending $15,000 to $18,000 to hire an outside firm to assist with the hiring process. Bernhardson replied, "That amount represents the cost for hiring an outside firm to handle the entire process. I believe that amount would lessen as the amount of involvement decreases." Goetten said, "I assu.me tnere would also be some changes if v/e conducted the search statewide, as opposed to national." Bernhardson replied, "That is correct." Goetten asked Bernhardson if confining the search to a state level would be sufficient. Bernhardson replied, "I believe there are a number of very qualified people in the State of Minnesota. I believe Minnesota has more professional police departments throughout the State, than found in other states." - 19 - h ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 28, 1991 POLICE CHIEF SELECTION CONTINUED Mayor Peterson stated that completed by February 4th. Council's worksheets will be FACILITIES WORKSHOP Goetten questioned whether Council v/ould have sufficient time to accomplish what needed to be done with respect to the Facilities Committee role, if any, prior to the expiration date of the land option agreement. She said, ’’I think if we hold this meeting in the middle of March, it may be too late." Bernhardson explained that he had suggesttjd the dates indicated because it allowed time for the Council position to be filled. Mayor Paterson asked Council who they wish to have at this workshop. She suggested the Planning Commission, the Citizens Group and Council. Jabbour said, "It seems to me that the Council has very strong feelings about the facilities. It may be appropriate for Council to share their views with the Committee, rather than having the Committee out in left field." Callahan stated that Council must select a site first, and then determine whether the scheme that has been shown represents the size building wo would like to have. He said, "Mayor Peterson and I have n.ver felt strongly about having all of the buildings on one site. Cc>st seems to be the major factor. It seems to me that if we determine that the scheme that has been shown to us is larger than we actually believe we need, then it would shed a different light on the cost of the building because the square footage may be less. W.» have been told the building will cost $85.00/s.f. to construct." Goetten said, "I have been told that $05.00/s. f. is fairly extravagant. I would like to see if there are other options. People are paying taxes through the nose. VLt* need to assure them that we have explored every option and that the proposal is the most coat effective." Mayor Peterson stated that the issue of operating cost differences between the Highway 12 and Crystal Bay locations has never been discussed. Jabbour said, "We need to determined if the City of Long Lake should be asked whether they wish to share our public works facility. That may be a driving factor in the where the facility is located. Long Lake has indicated that they may wish to share our facility, but they do not want it located on Casco Point. W.'i need to provide the Facilities Committee with a list before they go shopping." - 20 - ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 28, 1991 FACILITIES WORKSHOP CONTINUED Callahan said, "Tho Council building or the site." has to either start with the Jabbour stated the current market is right for the City to undertake the project at a reasonable cost. He said, "Council must move this issue along, not hastily, but with as few delays as possible. I would like to see the Council reach a decision as to whether all the facilities should be on one site or two." Mayor Peterson said, "I have always been in favor of having the police and administration on the present site and public works on the Old Crystal Bay property." Goetten stated that she had favored having all of the departments on one site. She said, 'I believe that having everything together was more cost effective. However, I am not committed to that, if there are reasonable alternatives. Another concern of mine is the proximity of the facility to the community." Jabbour said> "I have changed my position and now believe that having two possible may be the better alternative." Callahan said, "Whether there are two s.tes or one, we need to determine where we can begin construction of a new public works facility. The existing shed is ready to fall down." Jabbour stated that the Highway 12 site was preferred because it met the most criteria. H? said, "I am very concerned, however, about where the Highway 12 corridor will go in relation to that site." Bernhardson s.aid, "Whether there are two sites or one, construction of t.he public works building could proceed once a site is selected. Thus far it has been determined that the best location for the public works would either be Highway 12, or the old sewer plant site." Callahan said, "Let us tentatively decide that we are going to have two sites. Let us then assume that Staff will now look for a site where we can build a public works site. The City does have an option on the Highway 12 property. Now that we have made that decision, we can turn our attentions to the type of building that we will put on the site." Mayor Peterson noted that an architectural class at the University is assisting with the design of the building. Bernhardson said, "It is my understanding that the class is working more with internal arrangement, rather than external characteristics. The class consists of first and second year - 21 - L ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 28, 1991 FACILITIES WORKSHOP CONTINUED architectural students, I do not know that they will provide us any solutions. If Council would lilce another design to consider for this site than what you have seen, Staff needs some criteria.“ Mayor Peterson stated that in her opinion, the structure that was present ad did not appear to be designed for this area. Goetten and Callahan concurred. Callahan stated that the building was presented with the hope or intention that it would be constructed on Highway 12. Goetten agreed that there was no consideration given to the present site. Bernhardson asked Council to consider what characteristics were undesirable in the building design that was presented. Callahan said, "The architect objected to the building design for this site because it was too large. Perhaps if he knew that we are considering this site, he could make his own adjustments. I think it would be appropriate for us to look at the old drawings and determine what we like or dislike." Bernhardsor said, "The first question is the size of the building, seconu is the quality of materials, and third is design. Once the architect knows what kind of square footage he is dealing with and quality of materials he will need to use, he can go back and design a building for this site. If Council has any specific ideas that would make the building more suitable for this site, please let me know." Jabbour asked if Staff could provide information showing the pros and cons of two sites versus one site. Bernhardson said, "I think operationally in the long term, it would be much better for the organization if everything was on one site. When there are separated sites, animosity tends to build among employees. I believe the organization here began pulling apart when the police department moved to Lony i.ake. From a cost standpoint, it would be necessary to install a well at this location. It will also be necessary to include some accommodation for the po.st office. Additionally, there is the issue of delays and whether construction of the administration building could begin before the old building is removed. There may be additional costs involved with moving and renting other space. I believe the Highway 12 location is setback far enough where the location of Highway 12 will not be an issue. I have always thought that the sewer plant property is the most centrally located and for both facilities would be the best option. However, objections were raised to that site because of the residential area. I do not believe the issue of driving time to this site versus Highway 12 is very significant." - 22 - • • % 5- t ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 28, 1991 FACILITIES WORKSHOP CONTINUED Mayor Peterson asked Bernhardson if the Crystal Bay residents had been asked to give their opinions about continuing to use the present site for City facilities. Bernhardson stated that he had not done a survey of the Crystal Bay residents. Callahan suggested that Staff send a post card to residents asking them to express their opinion. He said, "Explain to them that ws are considering a two story building with the police department. It would also be helpful if Staff could circulate again the figures it has regarding the comparative costs." It was the consensus oc Council to delay the scheduling of the Council workshop until the February 11, 1991 Council meeting. MUNICIPAL BOARD HEARING UPDATE* It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Callahan, to accept the information presented by Mark Bernhardson regarding the upcoming Municipal Board Hearings. Motion, Ayes-1, Nays-9. Motion passed. OPTION EXTENSION - HIGHWAY 12* It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Callahan, to direct staff to extend the option for the property on Highway 12 in accordance with the terms of the Agreement dated August 30, 1990. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0. Motion passed. AGENT OF RECORD/ADDITIONAL VEHICLE INSURANCE 1991* It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Callahan, to appoint Mr. D'jweyne Carlson,* Apple Valley Agency, as Insurance Agent of record for 1991 at a fee not to exceed $6,800.00, including commissions earned through policy premiums paid by the City; and to award the 1991 insurance for the additional City vehicles to the LMCIT effective January 1, 1991, as proposed. Motion, Ayes-4. Nays-0. Motion passed. ADMINISTRATIVE AND PERSONNEL POLICY UPDATES RESOLUTION »2922* It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Resolution #2922, as the adopting agreement for Attachment B being the update to the City's Administrative and Personnel Rules. Motion. Ayes-4. Nays-0. Motion passed. REQUEST FOR FUNDING* It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Callahan, to authorize the payment of t.he amounts as outlined in Attachment A, as budgeted amounts for 1991. Motion, Ayes-1, Nays-O. Motion passed. - 23 - r I: L' ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 28, 1991 ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION Mayor Peterson requested the removal of this item from the Consent Agenda. She stated that the "Laker" newspaper does not include information pertaining to Ovono. She said, "Not everyone residing in Orono receives the Pioneer." Bernhardson stated that the City Clerk will be receiving a map showing the circulation areas for the Pioneer. Callahan referred to the November receipts and disbursements information and asked Council if they had reviewed it. He stated that revenues are becoming a concern and we should continue to monitor them closely. Bernhardson stated that Orono was more fortunate than other communities that have still been receiving State and Federal aid. He said, "The City of Orono will not lose more than $2,000 or $3,000 this year as a result of diminishing State and Federal funds." It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Callahan, to accept the City Administrator's Information regarding; 1991 DARE Program, Newspaper Area Coverage, November Receipts and Disbursements, and Wire Transfers. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0. Motion passed. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: None. LICENSES Goetten expressed concern regarding the number of businesses that are selling cigarettes over the counter. Bernhardson stated that further. would look into the issue It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Callahan, to approve the following license(s): Over the Counter Cigarette:Wayzata Country Club Keaveny's Navarre Drug Jimmie's Lounge Rick's Super Valu O'Sullivans Orono Self Service Navarre Liquors Navarre Bowling Lanes Navarre Anoco Motion, Ayes-4. Nays-0. Motion passed. - 24 - fci' r.'. !/ p- iifr-l :• ii{\ ^;^:-vf'^it:- t?.:' Ml • • ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 28, 1991 BILLS* It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Callahan, to approve payment of th-3 All Funds Account. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0. Motion passed. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to adjourn the Regular Council Meeting at 9:40 p.m. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays--0. Motion passed. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk - 25 - wmt iM * r h I I I t 'WsI K -.: I 2591.3 / COUNCiL TO: FROM DATS Mayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrate^ February 5, 1991 9i FEB 1 1 1991 CITYOFORONO SUBJECT: Senior Citizen’s Presentation ISSUE - The Senior Center from Long Lake will be at the top of the agenda to express their thanks to the Council for their continued support. Present at this meeting will be following: JoAnn Kvern Mr. and Mrs. James Molvaney Audry Overby It should be remembered that the Council did approve the monies for the following organizations at their January 28, 1991 Council meeting: Senior Community Services West Hennepin Senior Center Orono/Long Lake/Medina Senior Center No further action is required. Senior Community Services' relationship with the Orono Community dates back to 1982 when your council voted to support the work of one of our programs * then called Westonka Counseling for Older Adults, now referred to as the Senior Outreach Program. This program works with the very frail, often quite old client. Staff of Senior Outreach work, usually on a one-to-one basis, with the older person, helping them find the programs and services that will keep them out of a nursing home. It is a vital program and with the numbers of older people increasing in our suburban area, one that will continue to be very, very important. 151 client contacts were made with clients or on their behalf in 1990. In 1984, Orono agreed to support the Westonka Senior Center and now in 1991 the Long Lake-Orono-Medina Senior Center. People living in the western part of Orono attend Westonka. and those in the eastern section attend Long Lake-Orono-Medina Our 1990 statistics show that the two centers served over 1,900 individuals - 34% in the 65- 74 age range and 47% In the 75-84 age range. 67% of those were women. Many programs and services are available to older adults at a Senior Center. 260 volunteers contributed 22,000 volunteer hours. One reason our Senior Center operates with the low number of staff. * Over 14,000 meals were served. ■r- Over 13,000 rides were provided. * Many educational programs were offered; • 55 Alive Defensive Driving Course • Art and Music Series funded by the Minnesota Humanities Commission and Women's Financial Program. * Health Programs and Screenings: • Blood pressure, hearing, flu shots, etc. • Over 50 and Fit Exercise Classes A multitude of opportunities for the retired/older adults of your community. •-> • ¥■ I- Tot Mayor Peterson 6 Orono Council Members Citv Administrator Bernhardson Dat«t Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Adminis February 5, 1991 Subject:#1600 Super Valu Store# 3333 Shoreline Drive Variances/Commercial Site Plan - Resolu: MEETING f'EB 1 X 1991 ®IV0F080N0 Additional Bxhibita * Exhibit BB - MCWD Letter 1/21/91 Exhibit CC - Applicant's Engineer's Letter 1/21/91 Exhibit DD - Applicant's Letter of 2/1/91 Exhibit EE - Final Site Plan/Grading i Drainage Plan/ Landscaping Plan This memo serves as a brief review of the issues raised in the review of the commercial oite plan/variance application for Super Valu. For more detail# please refer to the enclosed staff memos dated November 16# 1990 and January 17# 1991. This application was reviewed at both the November and January Planning Commission meetings. In 1976# 50' of the property was rezoned to commercial# B-3. Review Exhibit I and J. The City failed to complete the rezoning. The City staff will readjust the boundaries of the B*>3 zoning district and amend the legal descriptions of the B-3 zoning district to include the 50' corridor. The zoning issue can be completed by a simple clerical function as the rezoning was already approved in 1976. The City has an open space/Conservation easement over the remaining 100' of the property that remains zoned LR-IB. In 1976# at the time of construction of the Super Valu store# the City granted a side setback variance to the west lot line of 15*. While not noted in that review# a side setback variance was also required along the southeast side (required * 60*1 existing - 25'). The current application involves a variances# as follows: request for two Section 10.42# Subdivision 7 (G) A. West lot line addition: Required - 100' Existing « 85* Proposed ■ 10* - Variance setback. Variance ■ 90* or 90% Section 10.61# Subdivision 10 (O) - Required 1 stall per 150 s.f. net floor area per Section 10.61# Subdivision 4 (D)# determined as follows: Gross floor area =• 22#318 s.f. offices# non-commercial/warehouse floor area of 20#086 s.f. - 10% for hallways# storage areas * net I. Zoning File #1600 February S, 1991 Page 2 I'-*-* 20»086 s.f./150 = 133.9 or 134 stalls Existing stalls * 114 npsed » 108 (loss of 6 stalls) irfrtSnce » 26 stalls The applicant proposes a 75' addition along the west side of the existing structure. The major portion of the addition (47*xl20’' consists of an expanded sales and storage area. The remaining portion of the addition (28'xl2') is a receiving dock and a retaining wall at 17' high that runs parallel to the west lot line. The receiving dock addition and wall will be located 10' from the Kelly Avenue west lot line. The addition will also result in the loss of 6 parking stalls. Members iray remember that at the time of the upgrading of 15 and 19 within Navarre, the applicants lost additional parking with the taking of additional lands for right-of-way purposes. The scorm sewer issue and vacation of the northern portions of Kelly A'»enue were discussed but not formally addressed by the Planning Commission. Staff's concensus with concurrence by the Planning Commission was that a storm sewer project would not be appropriate at this time and would be feasible at the time of a Navarre Comprehensive Redevelopment Proposal for this area. Please review the Planning Commission minutes of January 22nd and Exhibit C for comments regarding the proposed vacation of Kelly Avenue. Once aga. n, the vacation of Kelly Avenue may best be addressed at the -.ime of a redevelopment of this area. At present, both affected property owners wo. ,d not agree to the vacation. At the final review of the application in January, staff asked both the Planning Commission and the applicant to consider the issue of relocating accesses to the site. The purpose was to minimize the hazards created with the close proximity of the Shoreline Drive access to the intersection of 15 and 19, and recoounended moving it to Kelly Avenue and closing off access along the north property line. The applicant advised that they had addressed the safety concern of the intersection o. the County Roads by moving t’le current access 20' further west. The problem with moving the access further west is that it is now dangerously close to the intersection of Kelly Avenue and Shoreline Drive. As for the relocation of the access along 19, the existing elevations may prohibit truck use if a curb cut was to be shared with the bank property. The applicant is concerned that dalivary trucks could not make the turn given the variation in grades from the existing curb cut at the bank to the level of the parking lot. Zoning File #1600 February 5, 1991 Page 3 Although Planning Commission refused to address the access questioHf accepting the applicant's position that this matter had already been addressed two years ago with the upgrading of the County Road» it is staff's position that this is a variance application and the City has every right to address the issue of access to the site. The applicant has been advised of staff’s position* and we ha'*'’ asked representatives of the County and applicant to meet ov - the site to determine if there are other alternatives of acc*- a the property and parking layout. Staff will report on these wdings at your meeting. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance and commercial site plan application as proposed and accepted the accesses as proposed per applicant's site plan conditioned upon receipt of a landscape plan and pla* ’ng schedule. Specifically* directing applicant to provide r-round/evergreen-like plantings along the west lot li. - and plantings along the southern boundary of retention pond where existing vegetation was to be removed with the installation of the detention pond. Please review Exhibit EE* the landscape plan fails to show plantings proposed along the southern boundaries of the detention pond. These plantings are necessary to provide the natural buffer to the residential properties to the immediate south. It should be noted that the minority opinion felt that the applicant failed to respond to the concerns of the Planning Commission in the original review as no changes were proposed at the second meeting. In addition* the minority opinion felt that the position paper of the applicant (Exhibit Z) did not address the concerns expressed by the Planning Commission. The enclosed rt'*solution has been drafted per the approv ju recommendation of the Planning Commission. Staff has added a condition requiring landscaping along the southern boundaries of the detention pond and upon resolve of the access issue* the resolution will include any new conditions set forth by Council regarding changes in the access location. A RBSOLOTION 6RANTIRG VARIAHCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.42, SUBDIVISION 7 (G) AND SECTION 1^.61, SUBDIVISION 10 (O) FILE #1600 WHEREAS, Richard Bloomquist (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in the property located at 3333 Shoreline Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Exhibit A, attached (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section IC.42^ Subdivision 7 (G) to permit the construction of a 75' wide addition to be located 10* from the west side lot line instead of the required 100'; and a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.61, Subdivision 10 (O) seelcing approval of a total of lu8 parking stalls where based on the total net floor area, the expanded use would require 134 stalls. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1600 2. The property is located in the B-3 Commercial Shopping District and the LR-IB Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on November 19, 1990 and January 22, 1991 and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings: A) A 30' wide utility easement divides the ; roperty in half forcing applicant to either expand east or west. A northward addition would not be allowed to encroach over the utility easement. B) The topography to the east prohibits feasible expansion in light of the impact on adjacent property and improvements on that property. Page 1 of 5 S-v !;• r' C) The only feasible location for an expansion of the existing structure is to the west and the vacation of the northern portion of Kelly Avenue does not appear feasible and would require a comprehensive planning study of the entire area. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions^ light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5« The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. COMCLOSIOHS, ORDER AMD CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.42, Subdivision 7 (G) and 10.61, Subdivision 10 (0) to permit the construction of a 47'xl20' addition to the principal structure, a 28*xl2' receiving dock, and a retaining wall at a maximum height of 17* along the west side of the receiving and delivery ramp, subject to the following conditions: 1. Council to direct staff to make the necessary eunendments to the official zoning map and legal descriptions of the zoning district boundaries to include 50* corridor along the southern boundary of the existing B-3 zone, the remaining 100' of the southern portions of the property are to remain in the LR-IB zoning district. 2. Preliminary site plan by Planmark to be amended to include landscaping along southern boundaries of detention pond. 3. Applicant shall make payment for additional sewer/water units and SAC charges to be determined at the time of building permit review. Page 2 of 5 *. p- 4. The applicant and applicant's representatives have been advised that the new addition and existing building shall be served with an approved fire suppression system per Appendix B of the Uniform Building Code. 5. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicants but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval* or this variance will expir.s on that date (February 11* 1992). 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code* shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein* and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7« The undersigned applicant* the authorized representative of Super Valu Stores Inc. and President of MGT COTtpany have read* understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves* successors and assigns* hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. i Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono* Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 11th day of February* 1991. ATTEST s Dorothy M. Hallin* City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson* Mayor Martin Ehlers* President of MGT Company Authorized Representative of super Valu Stores Inc. Richard Blooiiiquist* Applicant Page 3 of 5 1- . U -l.W. L' f it I.pp> g-- r I M STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instnunent was acknowledged before me on this 11th day of February, 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy N. Hallin, Mayor & City clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OP MINNESOTA ) } SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this <Jay of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OP MINNESOTA ) )S8. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN } On this day of 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared kno%m to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 4 of 5 Exhibit A -j K fiw-' P trar oTract D, Registered Land Survey No. I-?::. Files of Regis titles. County of Hennepin; The boundary lines of said land are r.arJced by Judicia. set pursuant to Torrens Case Nos. 17012 in favour of the City of Orono for sewage, ourooses over the Southerly 16 feet of th set of Lot 1, Block A. Townsi of above land) erne over the eet Of tne n as rked by Judicial Landwa ^ 17C22, 17024, 17026 andset pursuant to rorrens i«wo. 17065. Subject to an easement in favour o* — « ^ water and drainage purposes over /! - : West 30 feet of the North 134 feet o. *,o... Block . To of Langdon ParK (Now as to part of above . ect to the underground utility easement and J; favour of the City of Orono over the Nor-h West 100 feet of the South 100 feet c. -he Nor-h -.4 -e ^ Tovnsite cf Lanccon Park as containeo in pace"l36. Document No. 3449568; 'Nov inSubject to”the“undirground utility easement and 1, Block 4, Townsite of Lancoon ;23 of Deeds, page 136. Document No. 344956-; : of above land) - V- {:■ ;K.,-p-'-. TO;Mayor Grabek & Crono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono planning Commission Members Citv Administrator Bernhardscr. Froa;Jeanne A, Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Data;November 16, 1990 Subjects #1600 Super Value Store, 3333 Shoreline Drive - Variances/Coiranercial Site Plan - Public Hearing Soiling District - B>3 Area » 150,481 s.f, or 3.45 acres (exclusive of road right-of-way) Required * 2 acres per Section 10.42, Subd 7 Existing Building = 16,192 s.f. Addition « 6,126 s.f Total Building - 22,318 s.f. (A) Floor Area Ratio » 14.83% Allowed ■ 28% per Section 10.42, Subd 7 (B) Pertinent Ordinances - Section 10.42, Subdivision 7 (G) - Variance setback. West Lot Line Required Existing Proposed Variance •O' Addition: 85’ 10' 9^* or 83% East Lot Line Required Existing Variance •Ab‘ .^0 '• ' Existing Build.^ng: 60’ 25’ 35’ or 58% Section 10.61, Subdivision 10 (O) - Required 1 stall per 150 s.f. net floor area per Section 10.61, Subdivision 4 (0) is determined as follows: Gross Floor Area > 22,318 s.f. Reduced by 10% for Hallways, Offices, Non-commercial/ Warehouse Storage Areas = Net Floor Area = 20,086 s.f. 20,086 s.f./150 - 133.9 or 134 Existing Stalls > 114 Proposed « 108 (loss of 6 stalls) Variance » 26 stalls Zoning File #1600 November 16, 1990 Page 2 of 6 List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit 1 - Exhibit J - Exhibit K - Exhibit L - Exhibit M - Exhibit N - FThihit Q — Exhibit P - Application Property Owners List Plat Map Applicant's Analysis of Parking Needs Applicant's Engineer's Letter 11/7/90 Applicant's Engineer's Letter 11/9/90 Existing Drainage Plan (Kelly Ave) Kelly Avenue Drainage Report - 1976 Zoning District Boundaries Rezoning Ordinance Approved 3/8/76 Resolution 3/8/76 Navarre Redevelopment Sketches Drainage Plan Approved 8/26-”^ ^ Fixtures/Floor Plan Pialliiiliigry Site Plan——^ Survey History of Property - The property was formally owned by IDS Properties. The property as currently configured was subdivided in 1976 for sale to Super Value Inc. to build a new super market. Concurrent with the subdivision was a rezoning and commercial site plan application for Super Value (refer to Exhibits I, J and K). The rezoning of approximately a 50' corridor located just to the north of the 100' conservation easement was to be rezoned to commercial. Staff has found taht the 50' corridor is still zoned LR-IB. The applicant was to fulfill certain conditions, specifically to complete construction within 2 years (1976 to 1978), completion of certain drainage improvements and execution of an easement over an exi*:ting sewer line. Note 30' easement that intersects property running east to west. The applicant fulfulled all of the obligations to the City, but, unfortunately, the City failed to formally rezone the 50' wide corridor that the present commercial building is located. Part of this review will be to realign and correct the zoning boundary discrepancy. During the commercial site plan review, the City granted a side setback variance of 15 ’ to the Kelly Avenue lot line. Please note the zoning code requires a 100' setback if the property abuts a residential zone. the southern portions of the commercial building are located adjacent to an LR-IB zoning district. Rather than rezoning the remaining 100' corridor on the south side of the property, the City opted to retain the LR-IB zone and asked for an open space/conservation easement over the corridor so that no construction could ever take place within the 100* required setback area (permanently assuring the 100' buffer to the residential zone to the south). Although not noted in that early review, ^0' would have been required from the east lot line as there is only ^ 25' setback from the southeast corner of the existing building the commercial side lot line. Ss-' Zoning Pile #1600 November 16, 1990 Page 3 of 6 In reviewing the minutes of these earlier arplicatiens and the sketch of the zoning district boundaries (Exhibit I), there is discussion of a future addition, approximately 40' wide, and the need for a future setback variance. There were no written commitments on the part of the City to approve a variance for a future expansion to the west. In review application, the proposed addition involves expansion of the sales and storage area, in addition to a receiving structure that extends beyond the 47' addition, approximately 28' at a width of 14*. The entire addition will be located 10' from the Kelly Avenue west lot line, requiring approval of a setback variance. Note, a retaining wall is proposed running parallel to Kelly Avenue providing the access lane to the receiving dock. The City has no detail on the height of that retaining wal 1. The addition does result in the loss of 6 parking stalls. The size of the existing structure requires approximately 101 stalls. There is no additional area to expand parking unless major alterations were done to the southeast section by removing the bank and greenspace. In an earlier application approximately 1 year ago, the City approved a setback variance for parking of O' because of the Hennepin County road improvements that resulted in the loss of additional land to the road improvement. In the 1976 review, the City already granted a 10' parking setback. Please review applicant's analysis of parking needs (Exhibit D). You may remember, we determined net floor area by reducing gross floor area by 10% as already shown above in the factual findings. The major concern for this review is the impact upon the existing drainange. This concern was noted even in the earlier 1976 review (review Exhibits G and M). In the 1976 commercial site plan review, rather than constructing a retention pond on the site, the City choose to have applicant install underground drainage tiles and drainfield areas to handle and treat run-off (Exhibit M). This would have appeared to have been a very experimental method or approach to the drainage concerns. We have nothing in our records to prove that this has been successful. Planning Commission members may remember recent concerns voiced by property owners living on Kelly Avenue of any improvements that would add additional run-off to their already over-taxed drainage system. There was much discussion in 1976 regarding the inadequacies of that same drai age system (Exhibit G). The City continues to be plagued with drainage problems within the Kelly Avenue neighborhood. Zoning File #1600 November 16» 1990 Page 4 of 6 The applicant has been asked to file an application with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (review Exhibits E and F). The current application addresses only run-off from the new addition. A retention pond is proposed within the 100' open space easement area to the south. In earlier discussions with the applicant, the City staff advised that staff wculd seek a storm sewer project for the Kelly Avenue area as a condition of the variance approval/commercial site plan review. There is no question that the hardcover surface of this property is a major contributor to the Kelly Avenue watershed. Lacking any information as to the effectiveness of the underground tile systems installed in 1976-77, the staff encourages a storm sewer project to correct historic drainage problem. Should the applicant be delayed until this is resolved? Members may also remember during the Navarre Re-development meetings we viewed alternate plans showing Kelly Avenue at the north closed off and cul-de-saced because the proximity of the access to the major intersection of County Roads 15 and 19, poor sighting distance and adjacent curb cuts create safety concerns. If Members feel this is appropriate, the City would proceed with plans to notify all affected property owners and to hold necessary meetings to discuss the proposed closing of Kelly Avenue at County Road 15. Do Members fee] this matter is dependent on the review of the current application? Issues for Discussion - 1. 2. 3. Does Planning Commission support staff's position that a storm sewer improvement is necessary to alleviate severe drainage problems within Kelly Avenue neighborhood? If so, the storm sewer improvement should be brought to the Council for conceptual direction. Should review of the applicant's project be delayed as run-off from addition is to be maintained with the installation of retention pond? Review Exhibit L, is this the time to move on the cul-de- sacing of Kelly Avenue at the northern end? The applicant's site plan should be updated to include curb cuts on adjacent property to east in order to determine a functional location of turnaround and to minimize major land alterations. There is a southern access drive to the Keavney property that must be retained from Shoreline Drive. The vacation of the road may minimize intensity of setback variances sought by applicant. What direction can you give applicant as to the side street setback variance sought with the improvement (required -W*; proposed 10')? Zoning File #1600 November 16, 1990 Page 5 of 6 A) Can the receiving addition be relocated on building . . . consider elevations on the east side yard? Would the location on the east be functional? B) Would a setback of 5' tc a side yard rather than a 10’ street side yard be r.cre acceptable? There is little room for a 28' addition at southeast corner. C) What impact would there be on drainage facilities approved in 1976? Certainly the expansion at the southeast corner would require major land alterations. D) The 30’ wide utility easement prevents all expansion to north. It may be timely to remind Members that this lot was approved in 1976 for development by Super Value. In the original proposal, setback variances were granted for the new construction because of the placement of the 30* sewer utility easement that cuts the commercial zoned portion of the property in half placing severe limitations on expansion. Review Exhibit I, the City was made aware of the future plan of Super Value to expand to the west. The extensive minutes of those earlier reviews address that future wwhdijfision. 4. What is Planning Commission ’s position on parking requirements and need for a 26 stall variance per Orono Code? Once again, please review methods of determining parking needs set forth in applicant's addendum (Exhibit D). A) What is a reasonable or acceptable parking stall variance? B) What the Planning Commission position if the applicant was asked to execute an agreement to expand parking if the need arises along the east lot line? Review the elevations along the east lot line. Note what types of land alteratons would be involved with that expansion. If Kelly Avenue is vacated at the north, parking could be expanded on the west side with the additional 33*. C) What about limiting all other users of the parking lot (i.e. special sales, satellite/photo pickup structures) and any others Planning Commission Members have noted in the past. ,'v •mV I f Zoning File #1600 November 16» 1990 Page 6 of 6 5.Landscaping. What types of plantings can be installed on the hardcove r within the hardcover surface? Plantings along the County right-of-way will be destroyed by salt and may create sighting problems. Planning Commission should provide direction. 6.Once again# you are reminded that the southern 50* of the property occupied by the building is still zoned LR-IB. Staff will finalize the directives of the Council of 1976 and complete the final clerical finction of the rezoning by updating the zoning map and correcting the legal descriptions of the City. 7.Elevations of addition. The City must ask that the applicant provide elevations of proposed addition as this would be part of the normal commercial site plan review. The Engineer's report is not available fcr inclusion within your packets and will be presented at your meeting. Bttview of Items to be Addressed by the Planning Comnission - 1.Kelly Avenue storm sewer project - Should applicant's project be delayed until the improvement is resolved? 2.Cul-de-sacing of Kelly Avenue at north end. Doe^ the resolve of the cul-de-sacing have an impact on applict-nt's current proposal? 3.Position on parking stall variance and side street setback variance. 4. Others deemed appropriate by the Planning Commission Review of Items to be Addressed by Applicant - 1. Provide elevations of addition. 2. 3. Address Issues raised by City Engineer. Provide landscape plans based on the directives of the Planning Commission. Detail on retaining wall located 10' from Kelly Avenue. Provide amended site plan locating curb cuts on commercial property to west of Kelly Avenue (Keavney property). 5. Others deemed appropriate by the Planning Commission. To:Mayor Peterson & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:January 17, 1991 Subject:#1600 Super Valu Store, 3333 Shoreline Drive - Variances/Commercial Site Plan - Continuation of Public Hearing Additional Exhibits Exhibit Q Exhibit R Exhibit S Exhibit T Exhibit U Exhibit V Exhibit W Exhibit X Exhibit Y Exhibit Z Exhibit AA Planning Commission Minutes 11/19/90 Planning Commission Action Notice 11/27/90 Fuller Letter Regarding Partial Vacation of Kelly Avenue 1/4/91 MCWD Report 12/21/90 Cook Report 1/11/91 Applicant's Engineer’s Report 12/28/90 Plan of Retention Pond - — r Erosion Control Methods - i.. • Catch Basin Detail — u- f Applicant's Position Packet - Enlarged south/west elevations laauaa to Be Resolved by City - Partial vacation of Kelly Avenue - refer to Exhibit S. As Nr. Puller's letter advises, he has discussed the proposed partial vacation of Kelly Avenue with the adjacent landowner to the west. Mr. Keavney has voiced concern .^ith the vacation of Kelly Avenue at the northern end because of his needs to provide vehicular access to the southern portion of his property. Staff's inspection of the existing roadway found the topography restrictive and questioned the installation of a cul-de-sac adjacent to property boundaries. The appropriate place for a cul-de-sac may be further south and may not just involve the Super Valu and Keavney properties. A cul-de-sac at the north end of Kelly was never proposed because of the existing commercial uses and vehicular accesses to sites. Members may wish to review Exhibit L of the previous November packet. The planner suggested a realignment of and the creation of a new road with the Navarre redevelopment plans. Access to the southern portions of the Keavney property were to be achieved via a new east/west road to connect with Shoreline Drive further west. Zoning File #1630 January 17, 1991 Page 7 Please review Exhibit U. The City recommends moving existing access on County Road 15 to a Kelly Avenue access and moving tho current access at County Road 19 to the sourthern property ' in*;. Applicant may be able to gain additional parking snails with the realignment of accesses. Topography at the south lot line may restrict moving access to southern lot line. This is an issue that would be best resolved by City Enginear and staff working with applicant. Drainage The City Engineer's r.-^nor"' -.f’.ects the opinion of the City staff. The storm sewer prc* en s ' f Kelly Avenue cannot be solved by this property owner on.y. Storm sewer problems may best be addressed with a comprehensive study at the time of redevelopment proposals for Navarre. There is no doubt that this property is a major contributor to the surface run-off but at the same timv' this property will also be assessed for this project based on the amounts of surface run-off that originates from this site and enter the watershed. Cook confirms that the retention pond will treat all run-off that results from the proposed addition. The City Engineer was asked if making the pond deeper would allow for greater retention. In this case Cook responded chat by deepening the pond you would encourage standing water and in cases of storms, this standing water would already occupy the lower retention ar«a providing no additional retention capabilities on site. Ron Quanbeck of the MCWD has confirmed that run-off from the addition will be handled by the proposed retention pond. There is no structural damage with the seasonal flooding that takes p]ace within the spring and fall of ^ t year. The storm sewer issue is one matter that will be acjiessed in either a redevelopment project for this area or by an independent storm sewer project. Issues to be Resolved by Applicant Per directives of the Planning Commission, plese review Exhibit C, the applicant has prepared position papers responding to concerns of thw Commission covering excessive side street setback variance sought at west property line, impact of the retaining wall along west property line, elevations of structure, relocation of internal improvements, relocation of receiving dock and compactor. The applicant has submit* ed cement elevations of the addition as it .elates to the existing structure. Review Exhibit AA), the retaining wall is shown at a maximum height of 17' from final grade. Staff does not understand the import of tie relocating of the ramp at the receiving dock. Applicant should be asked to respond. Applicant's contention is that the wall will not only provide a >'isual buffer to the residence to the immediate southwest but also a noise barrier. IL. Zoning File #1600 January 17, 1991 Page 3 The majority of the Planning Commission members in att<=*ndance had little problem with the 26 parkina stall variance sought by applicant. The realignment of accesses may provide additional area for additional parking stalls. Staff will not attempt to repeat the findings and,or hardships noted by the applicant in Super Valu's position packet. Staff would only add the most obvious hardship to the land is the location of the 30’ wide utility easement that completely divides the property in half forcing applicant to either expand east or west. The topography to the east prohibits reasonable or feasible expansion in light of the impact upon adjacent property and improvements on those properties. A receiving dock may have been able to be installed to the northeast side of this structure but the utility easement prevented such expansion. In 1976 at the time of the development of the property, the City approved a 15' setback (required = 100’ from a residential lot line, approved ■ 85’). The applicant’s addendum information advises that the major portion of the addition is located 40' frcm the side lot line as only the receiving dock and retaining wall structure is located 10' from the side lot line. Staff would contend this structure still has the same visual impact. Options of Action Denial - If denied, please site the necessary findings from the variance sections of the Zoning Code and provide applicant with direction as far as what would be a reasonable setback for a new addition to the structure. Approval - Planning Commission members may site the hardships noted by applicant and staff above. Approval would involve the granting of a side street setback variance of 90' or 90% and parking stall variance of 26 stalls (existing - 114, pi»oposed * 108, required * 134). Approval may be suject to one or more of the following conditions: 1.AppI leant to work with City Engineer to determine feasibility of relocating accesses to site. 2.Applicant shall provide additional natural plantings along ..outhern boundary for plantings lost with installation of retention pond. 3.Landscaping, parking, drainage and grading plans approved per drawing of Planmark. a. b. Parking at 108 stalls. Land^icaping as shown along south and west lut lin'/ - planting schedule to be submitted prior to Coui .1 approval. 4.Payment of additional sewer/water units to be determined at time of building permit review. - CITY OF ORCNO “ VARIANCE APPLICATION n m ^ . w . .• • V — - • ’ n r• V initial Application Fee $175.CC ($50.00 per each additional variance, Renewal Variance Fee $100.CC (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _'-Ijt' • 9V\ PROPERTY LOCATION County Roads 16 i 19, iiavarre » a. » ^ . • *.. / Site Address^ Identification Number (P.I.D.) 20-j1/_~2 j—Li—----- , -. -r -'rr-“r ' tVC. *-•* * jl U. L. - • »i > V V W *. V V Property V: ,.i:y-rri -.-r • • «i* « V \ « r* U.V/ft •••-***\ •-.'i rdi •JV * I*M Jf * j • .• ••* - a JL t a Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT Name Richard Bloomquist Phone (heme, Phone (work) 471-3473 Address:3333 Shoreline Drive Citv: Qrono Zip:55392 OWNER (if difXer®*'^ than applicant)f'lG I Company Name Martin Ehlers, President Phone (home) Phone (wor)c) Address:P. 0. Box 437 Citv :’.edwood Fall Zio:56233 Date Property Acquired (menth/year) I (jffili (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Grocery Store Other (specify) p. *. V, DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 250,000, Describe request in derail: Variance requested for 10 fept sidq v^rej Qp KsUji Avenue and 108 total parking spaces. VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setbac.k Variances ( Other Parking Ratio Lot Width Front ' V _ _ Hardcover Side _ _ _ Rear) » « / / < ;. DESCRIPTION OP UNDSDAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Dfisc'^ibe unusual urccsr'tv ccndi^-cr.s crsvenuinc ccr.c-iancs wi^h zonin'? rndft"?^<»guiremenT:s~; ■'^arking* is naximur .vltr: avaiiacie area; site has been res:rictec 100 foot open sp*ac? easei^ent ana oy Loun;:y roaa *3K:nr. ^IP mm •• •• “* REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Fcm ... ._,,, .*.•2 Certified Procerty Owners Lisu of owners wirn«r. -sO (you musr co-ain this list from Hennepin Ccunny neparrr.ent of Finance A-503 Govt Center 348-3271). , . , Plat Map (obtained with property owners ^ist).^ . , j Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. . , ,, Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) ir any cnanges in existing grade are proposed. SIcetches or plans of floor and elevation views. , , As an addendum to this application, please artach a separate -ist of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City stafi. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (11" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vonr variance application is not coigplete—if the abq^^ iAfoma^ion has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ Date—_ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE . . The apolicant hereby agrees to provide all inrormation requirec^ o* requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay adaitional fees (s^aff time not covered by original fee payment) a.nd/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the inrormation supplied is true and cor^edt /to the b^st of his/her )cnowledge. ' Ijj. \ cate /g OWNERS SIGNATURE / J .The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to t.nis application and ..urv-ner authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staf.., consultant , agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes or inveswiga- tion and verification of this request. Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planni.ng Commission .Meeti.nc. Pla.tning Ccmmissicn Meetings »re held on third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present^at a.i schedule review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise t.he Bui-ding & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ■k-,V tr-. RUN M1€ 10/17/M HEIMRIN COUNTY PROPERTY INEORfttTION SYSTEM PROPERTY (MCRS LIST BATCH OOA PROP AOOR OltCR HAMi TAXPAYER NAME/AOM PROP AnOR CPOIER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AODR PROP AOOR OINER flANE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR AOOR OHNiR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR QMCR NANI TANPAVfR NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR QMNR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR ■■ M 17>I17-2S 4S 0099 0S400 SINMELINC 00 0 S JONNSCM ERE JOHNSON DALE S JOHNSON S900 SHORELINE OR NAVARRE NN 55S92 SO E0>117-ZS 11 OOOE 029E0 SMAOYHOOD RO BOVAOEUR SERVICE CENTERS V0VA6EUR SERVICE CENTERS CO RO 15 A 17 NAVARRE m S5S9E SO E0>117-23 11 0010 02955 SHAOYNOOO RO RAUL N ENBLUND ETAL RAUL N A JEANNE N ENBLUND RO BOX 990 HOUND Ml 55S99 SO 20-117>2S 11 00S9 02500 SHADYNOOO RO UNIVERSITY OF NINNESOTA UNIV OF HINN-REAL EST OFF HORUL HALL RM 3S5 100 CHURCH ST MRLS Ml SS95S SB 20-117-2S 12 005S 02501 KELLY AVE JAMES K LINDSAY BANISL T LINDSAY tStl HUNTINBTON RT RO E NAVZATA HN 5SS91 TOTAL BATCH 009 00015 SB 17-117-2S 99 0100 0SS02 SHORELINE OR DONALD H ULRICK ETAL BLASS II PARTNERS 19600-20TH AVE N PLYMOUTH Ml 55991 SB 20-117-25 U 0015 02995 SHAOYHOOO RO 1ST NATL BANK OF NAVARRE 1ST NATL BANK OF NAVARRE CO ROAO IS A CO ROAD 19 NAVARRE Ml 55S92 SB 20-117-23 11 0029 05555 SHORELirC OR MET COMPANY SUPER VALU STORES INC CORPORATE TAX OEPT PO BOX 990 MPLS MN 5S990 5B 20-117-25 12 0059 05925 SHORELINE OR RICHARD N KEAVENY ETAL RICHARD M KEAVENY P O BOX 59 NAVARRE Ml 55592 58 20-117-25 12 0059 02505 KELLY AVE JAMES K LINDSAY DANIEL T LINDSAY 2521 NUNTINBTON PT RO E NLVZATA Ml 55591 REPORT NO. RI9SS901 RACE 7 58 17-117-25 99 0101 05560 SHORELINE OR LAC KOENNEN LEROY A CAROL KOENNEN 26020 VALLEYNOOO EXCELSIOR MN 55551 50 20-117-2S 11 0017 02955 SHAOYHOOO RO JARIBO INC JARIBO INCORPORATED 9595 ENCHANTED RT SHORENOOO Ml 55569 58 20-117-25 11 00S2 0005B ADDRESS LMASSIBNEO 1ST NATL BAM( OF NAVARRE 1ST NATL BANK OF NAVARRE P O BOX 12S NAVARRE Ml 55592 58 20-117-2S 12 0099 0:S05 KELLY AVE PETER CHON NARY HANAGHENT PO 255 CHANHASSEN Ml 55517 SB 20-117-25 12 0055 U005B ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO DARYLE L UPHOFF ET AL OARYLE L UPHOFF 2997 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR Ml 55SS1 /O 1V. r V* ^ '-Kf . I !;•' iv fe-v> '^i- L-V ', M r' ■ ‘ ¥ ■ \^y r?r.c-a-- i' nJN DATE lO/17/fO •ATCH 00*NEMCPIN CaUNTV 7ROPEDTY INFORHATlfM SYSTEM PAQKKTY (»tCRS LIST REPORT NO. Pl*SS*Oi PACE 0 I CERTITY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTEO ARC AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HErtCPlN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PRCP'RTY TAXATION* TO THE DEJT OF MY KNONLCDGf AND BELIEF. DATE riislmos^feft (jux m ■M V'** >.• 7^V DAKOTA ys I ■* U 4 l«V «t€ ./. J • - f I ••II « ji If-i i ^ a J I HI [«ta • 4 1 • J 1 - [•W ? 1 r M%. m •» If » •• Bl .*.% '■ J 1** J 4r •- a • </»' >» • /I tn> *ir 44 •V,„, «l M « C33) i»% V (J«) . r*•i#*!' •%f-. ui> i* i‘, IPn !• SW« ! m-95 7 aCiUofO ' ^ >?ilf'*V’ • • J.L ^0^ • ■ J RICK ^jT' -s - SUPR •*v.^i i VALlC'y NAVARRE The following analysis Is proposed as it relates to square footage of the supermarket and the need for required parking as per ordinance. HETHOO "A- Store Total Square Feet 6 stalls per 1,000 *.f. of building METHOD "B" Store Total Square Feet Arbitrary 70X of space is sates area 150 s.f. of sell to 1 parking space METHOD "C* Store Total Square Feet Less the following non-storage/ nonuseable sales area: LVF/dt 22,286 s.f. 133 stalls 22.286 s.f. 15,600 s.f. 104 stalls 22.286 s.f. Vestibule 13'X 33'6"m 435.5 s.f. Meat Work Room 19'X 30*s 722.0 s.f. Mop Room 5'X 5'*25.0 s.f. Mop Room 5’X 8*s 40.0 s.f. Produce Prep 36'X 16'*576.0 s.f. Back Hallway 5'X 24'»120.0 s.f. Dell/Bakery Prep 16'X 46's 736.0 s.f. Dell/Bakery Storage 4'X 9'*36.0 s.f. Lunch Room 10'X 17'3 170.0 s.f. Restroom 12'X 17*3 204.0 s.f. Office Manager 8‘X 10'm 80.0 s.f. Office Cashier 5'X 10'•50.0 s.f. TOTAL 3.194.5 s.f. Therefore: Reduced Area 19,091.5 s.f. 150 s.f. per Parking Stalls 127 requir r t- I ARCHmCTURi I ENCINEERINC 11840 Valiev View Road. Eden Praire. NVN 553-*-i Mail Addicss Bo.x 1243. Minneapoiis. MN ”44':i Telephone 612 828-4500 FAX 612 82?-l'4j 5."'" . November 7, 1990 Hr. Ron Quanbeck Hinnehaha Creak Watershed District P. 0. Box 387 Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 NOV 8 1990 RE:Rick’s Super Valu Navarre, Minnesota Project «1006.13 Dear Ron: Attached Is an application on behalf of Rick's Super Valu for plan approval. The site is being modified by adding to the existing building with aoditional grocery store space and a loading dock. The access to the dock and a small portion of the parking lot will be revised per the attached plan. A storm water retention basin Is being proposed on a "space available basis; that Is -.he area available would be utilized allowing 3;1 sideslopes on the dike anc fcuilding backslope. The retention volume would be approximately 8,100 cu.ft. When the site was Improved in 1976, there were three underground storage spaces provided for storm water. These are shown on the 1976 plan of the site also attached to this application. They were excavated and filled • ith course rock to act both as drainflelds and temporary storage. We know or no data available as to the effectiveness of these spaces. There Is a history of flooding along Kelly Avenue. There is no clearly visible th#n with McCoiabs-Knutson Associates^ to suggest alternative solutions to the flooding. At appears that none of the suggested improvements have been made. A copy of that report is submitted with this letter. An aerial topographic map, copy enclosed, was found in our files. This is not dated but is obviouslv 'pre' Freshwater Institute. It shows the relationship of the low ground to the store site. The site Itself will contain 123,840 sq.ft, of which 90,920 sq.ft, is hard surface (building, blacktop, concrete). About 7,000 sq.ft, of the bituminous parking drains to the catch basin connected to the county road system. About 16,500 sq.ft, of the adjacent property on County Road 19 drains toward the proposed retention. The latter contains about 13,300 sq.ft, of hard cover. f' t K^; PUllM/WIRK Letter to Mr. Ron Quanbeck Minnehaha Creek Watershed District RE: Rick’s Super Valu - Navarre, Minnesota Project #1006.13 Novemcer 7, 1990 Page 2 These numbers are tabulated as follows: On site to retention So.Ft. Hard 83.320 So.Ft. Grass 33,020 Adjacent to retention 13,300 3,20C Total Areas to Retention 97,120 Sq.Ft.36,220 Sq.Ft. If we assign Imperviors factors of 0.9 for hard cover and 0.3 for grass, the composite "c“ wIM be 3.74. A 20 minute, 100 year storm will produce 0.74 X 5.9 X 133,340 r 43,560 x 20 x 60 = 16,000 cu.ft. to the proposed retention with a volume of 8,100 cu.ft. The outlet will need to be designed for a rate of about 6.6 cfs. This does not allow for any retention In the underground storage. If an allowance Is made for this storage and a lower Intensity design storm is used, a low outlet rate is possible. I would like an opportunity to discuss this plan with you. Please call me at your convenience at 828-4510 Sincerely, PLANJf.RK Bruce R. Kelley, P.E. Enclo.«ures cc:Lyle {. Super Valu Polly SCUf., PLANMARK Jean Mabusin, Orono John Gerhardson, Orono Jk/100613 Miliiiil'iiiiiVi^li iiii i>LfllM/l/inRK ARCHITECTURE I ENGINEERING 11840 V jIIcv View Ra:d. tJen Frame. .MN -^-344 Mail Address Box 12^3 Minneapolis V.N--44''i Telephone 612-b2i?-45CXl. f.AX. 512 •2’i-474 5 November 9, 1990 wrr 'Ji i Mr. Ron Quanb«ck Minnehaha Creak watershed District P.O. Box 387 Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 13 1880 RE:Rick ’s Super Vaiu Navarre, Minr*esota Project No. 1006-13 Dear Ron: The fbilOMing information is submitted as a supplement to the appiication dated November 7, 1990. We have calculated the area draining to the low area lying on both sides of Kelly Avenue and the apparent storage voiume available in It. Our calculations are enclosed. Based on these estimates a 4-hour, 100 year storm will flood to a level Just under 939.0 feet (MSL 1929 USGS adjustment). The proposed retention dike will encroach on the 939.0 storage by about 250 cu. ft. The estimated added retention will be 8,100 cu. ft or a gain of 7,850 cu. ft. The estimated increase In runoff from added roof and hard surface will be from 8.950 sq. ft. converted from a "c" of 0.2 to 0.9, (0.9 - 0.2) X 8,950 t 43,560 x 1.05 x 14,400 = 2,175 cu. ft. This amount of added runoff will easily fit into the 7,850 cu. ft. added retention in this proposal. It is suggested that the outlet of the retention be rather small, so that the water will be stored for a relatively long period time and reduce the effect on the low ground. The a.ioo cu. ft. stored will reduce the flood level by about 0.08 foot. These calculations are based on zero outlet from the low ground. In fact, there is some outflow as svidencad by ths lack of standing water in the area. The rate of tt outflow cannot be easily calculated. Sincerely, Bruce R. Kelley, P.E. /rm Enclosure cc: Lyie Fuller, Mpis. Division Jean Mabueth. Orono John Qerhare'-son, Orono Polly Scott, PLANMARK I00ei3bk/i ■-i,- F.. F i .c- '•s M u w 1 S CJ G a 3T 0 yf ^ *T *T I ^ZZ^•2-Z4 3'). '7 e-*? T 37.2 O, -^11;l.\ \ 8 4., O 1 ^ 37.3 17, S^i f ,^c *r 3, 7(5 37>22. 3G+o ^3 37,^26:.,83to Z.4^0 o “T / 37 3t,3o^17,'‘==J7'5 77.7 >*7, IdZ 3,3^9 \4. 3 37. e ^0, Zv9 3, S 02 l6. »i-=r 37.^7Z7 4. .; 4®“ T, 4- ^ y 22, S64 38 O 4^, *2x^0 4,(>^Z-) , 0 (:>0 3e.i ^4. 94cJ *?. ^87 3Z. Z47 38.7-4^, 6&0 ^Z2 '3Z 38.3 21.0 43, 22-> 38.+70. ^<aO fo, O ( T- 38.^7<5,7, -i,Z3 •=^7, 31b 38. to &1, 2K)Z t-T^6 < 8 Z 1 H !2— " ^ 1,7 0 O 3«.7 66,7*80 7 3, <r23 38.8 S, 8 2b ^S2-,S0<i z H\»-. ^ 1 8,3 4t^ 38.*3 <77, itO ^,4^*8 'T' l. ‘7fe."7 3 Hv2- - 8<;. 8 7<P \oz>c^8.883 10 (, 8 C;»0 4 H?u ^Z,*730 3*i^- 1 1^7, ^4o •»(:>,4’27 \1 z. \ )3, '2'Sc?1 t, 0 tol \Z3. <T4b 3*5.3 11 8, ^2.0 it. *5 8 S \ 43 37.+I23,*5(;c7 tZ.\2-8 147.272. 37.7 1 2*), 3oO 11,663 »78.83 i; 1 34,13.187 '73, 37.7 1 3^. ^^0 13.731^ Tv# u 1 4*5, 3 20 |4,2^ 1. ^'2. e> 3^.*)1 >o, 6 4»C?/4,788 Z\*5,8l7 4(3.0 /5(e>, c/OO lf.333 23l.X6»Cb rUMIMMRK AKMmCTUU IINCINU JNC I HM V«Btr ViM Um rriMW MN SS144 MidAMmcaM U4JlMwM«MlaMNS5«iO .i b'-• f«X. •i:-OM7«t HO |•KCIl':T SUMIIIK/ao^. • 3 PP^A\UA.C-c j H‘ 9- 9<g I r f /• H' ¥ !■ r-:. .•;i ; I 'f' :t- ¥ i. ¥ 160 "VtA^ c» o HiO«2.. S lU / iz o Mik).\-5 \ Ni / H t Q O MiO.\.3 inJ/ H»- Z4o Ml*0.. 6 !NJ / H A. "c" FAoTcj^- •'/o B o^iOcs J’^'^A c O - O'3 I o •/y C 0 M ,r o *& Co.» 03)-t- ( 0.1 X 0.8) -0.37 TOTAv- (^A^i»0 AiA-ftA 7tpz,000 (iUlU©F^ OAuC-UUAT\O^A I7,4«) A0^4 'O TA.U IfZ^jUCiFF fi'’ I z.©1 7, r4*;?! ,TOO C.F. Z..(c O. 3*7 /. b 17.1 (.02.■7^,340 ^.r. 5 a. 3s 1. 3 1 7.a'r, <^70 O.F. ; 4 nfc 1.0^(7. 4<=?4?. 4-3 ^2, 5’4o <£..F I lin W« 5SJM im Miiiiiiiiii MWS5440 (0A n ^A\^<43 HO •KUItCT NUMHtR /0O£. 13 II - 9i7 DPAlKJAC#e 6^00'^1 OF .t ■ H VI'" ' >V. I I-ISr #■’P- !.■ .‘3rT:rr''“. rmr^ k.« i 1 I ( 4 * $ •j M # 4 I f‘t,.. V-. ^ * X >i* V -A]fev •wr ^V/ > J-' .V •>.■ V »^i ■ •- . * • i .- A « / S' * ■ %* .---^L'"f 3- « • v'-'CCMBS i^.NOl SON » I INNOVATIVE MICROGRAPHICS V DUE TO THE POOR CONDITION rh OF THE PRECEEDING DOCUMENT WE CANNOT 4: PRODUCE AN ACCEPTABLE ;fv MICROFILM IMAGE. I. tt %II- i*I I-B I ‘y f: }y. i\ * ^7 r, ttCodk A^, 6^V/.c5 REPORT FOR KELLY AVENUE City of Orono March« 1976 March 22, 1976 Honorable Mayor & • Members of the City Council City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Subject: Kelly Avenue Drainage Report Dear Mayor & Council: As per your direction, we have completed the report on the drainage problem in the Kelly Avenue area. This report is intended to provide you with the engineering al- ^Qj^DA^ives available, together with their associated costs, for the alleviation of the periodic flooding problem of Kelly Avenue. We will be pleased to meet with you to discuss the contents of this report at your convenience. Sincerely, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOC^TES, INC Richard W. Sathre BNSslas enclosure k : • i I't- ¥ "r.i-. L'i- J: W i' vi4 I ^,. 0 '; ’ fj. As per the direction of the City Coui.cil, we have made a study of the Kelly Avenue area for the purposes of deter­ mining the causes and possible remedies of the periodic flooding situation for the purposes of making recommendations for the alleviation of this problem. At present, a total land area of approximately 46 acres is drained by a tile system to Carmen Cove. Roughly 9 of these 46 acres drain djy^gtly to the tile system, while the runoff from the re— mainirg 37 acres must pond in the marsh area adjoining Kelly Avenue to the east. This marsh area has the capability of atoring roughly 2.75 acre feet of water. When this storage capacity is exceeded, the marsh overflows across Kelly Avenue to the drain tile system Since the present situation exists because 1) there is no effective outlet for surges in flow voltimes; and 2) the storage capacity of the marsh is inadequate to prevent flooding; the alternative solutions would be: 1) Construction of an adequate outlet to remove excess runoff; or 2) Increase the storage capacity of the marsh; or 3) Decrease the runoff quantity Alternate No. 3, the decreasing of the runoff quantity is not feasible since the predominant land uses in the drainage area are residential and undeveloped. As the I! i • % r<r I ‘fc ii maining open land is developed, however, provisions should be made to allow for ponding of runoff to reduce the trans­ portation of sands and oils into the marsh and to increase the time of concentration of the runoff. Alternate No. 2, the raising of the level of Kelly Avenue and the reliance on evaporation and seepage into the ground of the pond effluent, would necessitate the raising of the street grade on Kelly Avenue for approximately a 400 foot stretch of the roadway. Soil borings taken in conjunc­ tion with the recent reconstruction of sewer lines across this marsh, have indicated very deep deposits of peat in this marsh area and have indicated that the roadway and those utilities constructed under it are actually floating over this peat deposit. The roadway has over consolidated the peat to a point where the roadway is rex^tivoly r able in its present situation. It is our opinion that if the roadway is to be raised, that the underlying peat deposit would have to be excavated and removed to provide the road with adequate foundation. This action would necessitate the removal and replacement of existing sanitary sewer and watermain and would therefore disrupt the surrounding area during the ooBStruetion operations. It is felt that in the attempt to raise the road sia^ly by filling on top of the existing roadway, would result in the displacement of these public utilities and that the over burden placed upon the road %fould rfv 'M' •r I f' Li result in a displacement upward of the ground surface and Jbhe adjoining the east side of Kelly Avenue could also increase the marsh storage capacity« but this is also considered impractical due to the existing soil conditions. Under Alternate No, 1, the conveying of excess runoff out of the marsh area through the use of storm sewer, two possible routes have been considered. These routes are identified as Route A and Route B and are shown on the en~ closed drawing. Route A indicates the conveying of water across County Road No. 19, eventually to the large marsh behind the Fresh Hater Biological Institute. Route B studies the conveying of excess runoff along Kelly Avenue to Lydiard Avenue and thence to Carmen Cove. All systems utilize a 10 year design recurrence interval. The use of ' i..volves the conveying of storm water from one drainage i^.A.'iin to another. Zt involves not only the City of Orono, but the e City of Minnetonka Beach as well, since the outlet from the sh behind the Fresh Water Biological Institute to Lake Minnetonka is in the City of Minnetonka Beach. Route B, although not following the natural drainage way, conveys the excess storm %#ater to its present ultimate discharge area. TWO alternatives under each routing have been considered. under Route A, Alternate 1, a gravity storm sewer system would be constructed. Under Route A, Alternate 2, a combina­ tion of force main and gravity storm sewer would be constructed. /.■ ‘Ir- I j f \h‘ f' Similarly, Route B, Alternate 1, deals with a strictly gravity outlet, where as Route B, Alternate 2, considers-a corl)ination d£ forcemain and gravity storm water conveyance. The respec­ tive costs of these systems are included as a part of this report As will be. noted, the forcemain system .costs are approx­ imately double the gravity system costs. The selection of either forcemain system is therefore not recommended. The costs of constructing a gravity system are approx­ imately equal for either routing. The decision as to which routing is most favorable should therefore consider the noii—cost factors involved in each as the determining factors. ^KELLY AVtMOc DRAINAGE REPORT 9'j/i XISTIN6 CULVERT / I f-*. V:v - A. fixcj it—?- ^ * ‘^luagrp V ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ -"'* r -^1 -. . r « i n iv.(it«a) VK? L'v •i^ . !tl .._. , C'^-.!-^.'x -/ V }-<-*;/ \VfV.--V PROPOSED i \\ SWALE-rk • i^b ^i-1 Oaoo) nu A*. ’V^'Sv v/‘ N Iff f A N? / !>y>//W?'-i-i... ♦ •? ^4 • ^ • /A *'•VXTV* I I -M <t^•» ^*' /^'X ^ ' / 5 /- .7 ss,?2#ff y Xl* I / w #it4 |)'V / «• A > •!^ / • # > $ •*< • yj •• t . #v> _ /. MeCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCMTER !»»* v*«# ••♦i**### • • ••• • BW~ I.. pr-f'> ' ■ S.’! Ii;> . ROUTE A ALTERNATIVE 1 - ALL GRAVITY SYSTEM 27* R.C.P.670 L.F.0 20 •$13,400 27” Concrete Aprons 2 EACH 0 350 -700 Menholes 2 EACH 0 600 -1,200 Jacking 60 L.F.0 125 7,500 Rip-Rap 4 C.Y.0 20 *80 Dragline Excavation 1,300 C.Y.0 2 2,600 Tree Removal LUMP SUM 1,000 Restoration LUMP SUM 1,500 Contingencies 2,800 ■Total Construction Cost $30,780 Engineering, Legal & Administrative 4,600 Total Project Cost $35,380 V :. • • •I . ALTERNATIVE 2 - FORCEMAIN « GRAVITY SYSTEM 14" D.I.P. Forcemain 27" R.C.P Manhole Lift Station 27" Concrete Apron Jacking Rip-Rap 500 L.F. 0 15 50 L.F. 0 20 1 EACH 0 600 LUMP SUM 1 EACH 0 350 50 L.F. 0 100 4 C.Y. 0 20 $ 7,500 1,000 600 40,000 350 5,000 80 y. s't' h K- f. >“ I i:k • f* K (■t'.W P«Si.-i :"*,-i j,..f'-.. , ‘ ' *•»! - . . * (■4 ^ : I...- ROUTE B ALTERNATIVE 1 - ALL GRAVITY SYSTEM 27" R.C.P.• 980 L.F.8 20 «$19,,600 27" Concrete Aprons 2 EACH 8 350 *700 Manholes 4 EACH 8 600 *2,400 Rip-Rap 4 C.Y.8 20 =80 Street Restoration LUMP SUM 8 2,000 Restoration LUMP SUM 8 2,000 Contingencies 2,800 Total Construction Cost $29,580 Engineering, Legal & Administrative m 4,450 Total Project Cose $34,030 ■ ' IttTERNATIVE 2 - FORCEMAIN 6 GRAVITY SYSTEM 14* O.I.P (Forcemain)550 L.F.8 15 “$ 8,250 18* K.C.P.430 L.F.e 15 =6,450 Manholes 3 EACH e 600 s 1,800 Lift Station LUMP SUM 40,000 # 18” Concrete Apron 1 EACH 9 300 -300 Rip->Rap 4 C.Y.9 20 =80 Restoration LUMP SUM 2,000 Contingencies 5,820 Total Construction Cost $64,700 Engineering, Legal & Administrative 6,500 Total Project Cost $71,200 I . I 1 v'<jBBS<i?liJ|'V3Bt' \ •lit '-afSJiJ PKniflvV? lA \ T>»sntjcx \ V \ \- \ IIf; I iA fc. [;r:. ri‘ resolution no. SETTINO FORTH REQUIREyr^;^^ *0 Be. fulfilled by SUP^^ jy. ^0 ODTAi:; A Rrr.ONiNo pursuan^ vo proposed op.d 2e.-,:;ce attaciie S Aemtc property In Naiarre^in'^thc Cicy'*??^orori°‘^/®"?V‘"''' 'ertain Exhibit A attached .hereto, and^ Orono, leqally described in to conditionally reconc^said^niooert Oo.Tjniosion a<jrcu us ccicaxn reauir.r.ento arc Zt .*•01;, t:!J;ki:!'o;u:, ':L it r<i;soLV!:;j; attacn.rvJ hereto“h_- ordinance City oi Orono in a for.T. accent "hie to'"-, ^he spacu-consarvation ou.s, n.-nt ^n:l^^.u^.l°•• T"’ ‘* -"’‘-'^^pctual open the uoutn 100 teft ot th..‘ nrorn.rff '.,^.7'.'^. casement overthe SOUtn 100 teft ot th..‘ nroper*^v^-io- casement over lunccion or bounty Hoa<i No*. l[ ,n ‘l •‘S’' m! '* the now c(3:.ed u;. Mt-l!- ^r.c .li.Ji r ' ' “’* •‘•’•.J which is Sup.r v.lu r':::os",r.. lt‘- rc«nr^|.neecs.ar.. leHux r;.,scr 1 ptlOn for City - U ^ U ^JC/ ^1 '7i • »' e r» •- r- . hupemarket Phase 1 with* ■» n’round' »-'instruct all of square foot within tv.o veurL o* r-- 7 16*000 Super V.lu agrees that the r*i?:. 'av resolution, described in exhibit A to LR-ln .oroperty legally claim for damages or In" wiunout oeing ii.,Me fir any two-year conatructicn deadli.no as ‘ set^rorth^i?erein^ Of tho S^y'ofTc^o '*><= cr-.y Council 6f 1^7f. • ‘O’Jr ayes anu zero nays on r«arc] ...a '•vtiy'',* fV - T^# J li I COUNTY ROAD 19 AREA • *Vi4 %• **Jk/*»tI| %'U*4|| • W k-' »' ••’•<* '*** tf( •^.■•^ • It.lU*" I r»t A«,;- .f»*t V 4 * • Mu»* u»« A*^' t»VM W»fw» J # fi,**A nil M»cti V Ui^xt y»*n> »A*ir u'j'i ♦•*»jn‘t t*.- • iW'4u*t: A**’ w.tn>#«' • w»%i*v ir*n»4 uiv c i4,*»^«**^** OilNWOOOY AVENU6 AREA • ilUV^I^ U»»^ifcap C*04ff MJ» K/U *V-*4ruMJ4t • MUM* • pLfvni At4,f^> K4M4f #4^ vjr*|A44*«> rtn^ur t-wwi* **ti v *A»4Ut ij^Vk? t 4W«-4D^ V M/t' itvMk • l«VtK^ 4Wt* lt«\|r«Ml fcU«-l.^i« V MlniLt M€> t^lA^W%#k4, iV*»At'V^ • I .>^4‘ Alt/ i«>t«4jrkr^TC U I • It.fUV liui«n| n>4«WH*A MVD^ik/T V iC u» m • fal-Ain/ AAJ LiA*l» V-t* *w*. • >U«.l*V>J I A *<»^ R'«u» ».W/^>.kX A^I*M 'V*! IV k|(VAC City of Orono NAVARRE AREA STUDY PRELIMINARY LAND USE ALTERNATIVE B t«^1M & COUNTV nOAO 19 AREA V. ?^E- I' |:-l- •J i. — • iil4l>4ft (AJyfY M9 ClfT • MA4kl\| P4Xl«fn«>4 i*ftAlu4i4l \f $4100 o 0*0 S# ^UJ0O • \onMO 00O 0r$0t ttifTiH • iit ui» Cl tuv IhC fHMVV M CAMiff FItfftMt 4#wn^^ • pt Vi.>4 vlM*1 V k*#**.* A^i-‘ #»<• 94(M.e A<«.Ct^ Ck.»Wlcl*. • iPwlA ^W*#, • U -Ik-* t»l»ik.« «>U**>vik^r U-»4#v*-tv W' 4«U*( .r^< • CtVft^A »mp1 ^ V jcr iia»,ia wpy u^o u^/im#»*w • iuMb 401^ iNitA»«Aiik>j • MWflir tir\IHI«lf *<M.1 HPIK4 wty»t 4*4^ City of Orono hJAVAnnil AREA STUDY PRELIMINARY LAND USE ALTERNATIVE C • 199 rnmmm* i l••llll P'■t I ji.-r-;.' -.>j COUNTY ROAD 19 AREA • i\.u^ ti*Ai.nt w • riAit U^^KiAi WH4 u> MfcA. i«’ /ys f\A«jK4ii icwu«*«ii • Pff.H *^tMC t trl>t|M 1*? AlfiA'.* l4.ti.**Ol A*|>. “liOil A#i» < ^ |%4 *4«A«t> W4»V\^4' A*.P Ws% IlA/44’ • 4* > • *4^*4 i4*4.^ w*«*i«*‘*» • I* .tl-*' If^nf *4*41 i.W4»-».*' I*’ M.*« V^/UAl ^4' *t%*AlW.iAl ..WUtIV ™ " -' ''t \ i£Qg^ u*P -mM ' •• I / fHLUkMjLI^ Sfj o'[bQ • « « DOMWOODY WiWUC AREA__________ • —Mi I—V —UM4P v4(—*47 • n\444r »«w M*. j— —«| 4*r v«fWM4* AM' mu t—M —iniM • WV»—^ «*»«• U— A« IM**U—*Uf W fit% CMTir MMUItU—i— #A^V<ty • t—OMi MVTAMrCMMfY M— • «f«tur — |»«ltMi»lf »UM«M^ • V»m — l41»aT*J«4A4 U»JnAt» CASCO POINT ROAD AHCA • rWi>UPA*4P C4»AiUtMU 4«Ui • UlYni. *f»4tf —tMM.4 t^*u« AA4A a/4* NIUC4 4*4* UM4* L‘.< U«4i».'v • UNiU^* MAt iMTvUiitTf ip M4\*t V»v^ fitiU C.WVwTv • ki.at..*' ^■^^^L li^t. iMlt^ City of Orono NAVARRE AREA STUDY PRELIMINARY LAND USE ALTERNATIVE A ^NQNIII «• •• (4t itf tMM> ■• lap^at ««*am •• .-"x Ml yr*^ \\ \ V <i^3^^l^^&'•^;Cw<: .w^v^i.«AAk.c*.«; \ \ C c c* •« j-r-wt* Um7 c^. \ -.■ ?■---------------r- - — '%'T ’\^\ii:»«c'v/~rrtr:. \vo \\\ \ "^ \\ \ \ .•.'' -.I ;.' \. \ \ \ \irr • *••• -• x\V" M V .1% * -4 / -£XIIUi..AMi^_7D MUT ■^•iHi^l^Ortf IX..T ....... *** oeTAiu i/A.( 4t . AJSSq^ \ W' tu\ \\'jn' ' •--«* % I p'r •» iijf; I1LI.M__llJUrj.!__I__I__j - '•---. IJ^ c —^rh rDiiTi F=^ i u • “ • ••■K». % ^•00.%~ • I* %- i l LI I « .» I 1 » FT I cll -I 1, » 1:^’ . 4 _u. *; • r‘ LU t;.. 1 fc h- r s « i 1 C "t J- - 1 f li • »’ »r ° • O -nD _□bDCi BsSSS . 2 iijiEaiS w. L^jpatruLT^ PjI nw \ii •' • • 'mmw 3-Vt II - h ll_i - ^ > S I I L ! ! • I -1 # - V -r •f •• • • • '«**•s!• - *#t^-:• •• r-|gS wi^-••• •- .if. *■' ••-.-ri •i•".* I #» - • • 4» :»j«4 r 10 t;- .^4*r* '*M • ;rM*-•1 m t Miiti4/ :«..•i* t04« x*** lt«••i»•»i-i. l-r-vS # *4 *.!»* f.1 * •«l>-i^ «*t.»M $^s J • • .nff ••• ii0>#ff tt •<# -lfIJU.1 lit—nfnr.1 T' r •'■V- fi.r: .f: rjr V' rrf ' 'kf ' (Ml. i,ilf, ■ ‘i"?. ■ l'" ' ‘b:hSr i ■ .ill'T IE INNOVATIVE MICROGRAPHICS DUE TO THE POOR CONDITION OF THE PRECEEDING DOCUMENT WE CANNOT PRODUCE AN ACCEPTABLE MICROFILM IMAGE. A J h •V ir- L.i;. ■ ‘.ti ii m0I- V [V- % lt-- }[?■■ %■ 'e F e.r ■zir tJ* Iti lojatt r««t ) i! iCirft r*-t j % RICK ’S NAVARRE. MN PI t iM -------- • ..*• • l*IJII%M«nHN % ilnSiRWEST^ I !•• v^ ^ iMi Ma Ml*. Ml. >1IM MwiipiAi.MI tM f II Ml m4S0i 9*m: til X V V- RICK'S »- Itift-fo I"-S:f s. .. H 3p- t«-f Ip »'!■'■Lrv^ ry i'-'' -t' -- ■ fc*''r f *'Kt- i'.i-v fp li:- ■r '.‘I |l'- tr- Ip' l: ,r I: vA S ; ■^^■ ■! :. .; .T P-.' : W. ::TK ^'*. •*' POSITON PAPER Subject:Screening Wall Point:Purpose A %m11 has been designed which serves three purposes on the west side of the building. It serves as a retaining wall, a screening wall and a guard rail. The wall does not have any Impact on drainage and Is not a hazard. Rather It serves as a visual screening wall from Kelly Avenue, a wall which will abate any noise created during delivery of product on this side of the store, and a guard rail to keep people away from the grade change. It has been designed to siROOth the transition of this side of the building from the back to the front of the building by using two elevations of wall height. Please see attached drawings Mi’ #' !¥•’- U i‘-' 5ffi»«r*iir I y e^U-Xii 1X41141 u 1^ Jj -I’'. !":sl:_J f • I rii^K I*-#*I’V 1 .* iT3 1 p» j c 1 I i. ! ~7»#« M»f i*^>««tiiiiir e«iiC H*teM Am *^r »19 t9ipii NM<K»19Mp»«9 99 9*9%§0 N^r m •1 m 99 ■HMfMi fM mA II 9^0^ mm 1#19 «M «i mgjl fii# hm •99MM Iter MM «•9li Mwi $•9 <>«4^ liMpii •w • MM MMM f*4 iMCffT teMM M STPfe tP-T^ l _mwT&S^ 131 tjfii ■j g,H El .-/I Kftfibd <i^ »UM fti.91* §9 9MP^ iru III ■IMRVAUiniMllt. me. Fcr. i p? lit » »’■ (i* • vS;-v INNOVATIVE MICROGRAPHICS DUE TO THE POOR CONDITION OF THE PRECEEDING DOCUMENT WE CANNOT PRODUCE AN ACCEPTABLE MICROFILM IMAGE. J l;v'. i'V. l! t r' it \y ■'•jI N^»*»•••• t'K* POSITION PAPER Subject:Store Size Point:Reduction In Size of Building The expanded size of this building has been very carefully designed to accomnodate the needs of the supermarket business. We have identified our specific needs of the interior and have designed accordingly. With this design, we get very efficiently, the following: Expanded Neat Oept. Expanded Fish Oept. Expanded Produce Oept. Nore Grocery Gondola One Nore Checkstand New Trash Removal System Enlarged Dairy Oept. Enlarged Frozen Food Dept. New Oeli Oept. New Bakery Dept. Customer Service Desk Nore Storage Ue have carefully analyzed and projected the size of expansion we need, our cost of approximately $100 per square foot, we cannot afford to make mistake. The present design proposed Is very efficient from the owners standpoint and will fill the citizens needs from Orono for many years to come. A reduction In size Is not feasible. At a Please see attached drawing. t i"' S' 1 6>Y'l<ilNA^/ k 'l Ui-Z \^, X , '€. Fe^y 1r 0irf riii^iefafcirjA uPLfin/MfIRK I If;- .'if:r I I ■fe ii i' ••■' -; V'' : . fi #• W' ts-s.-.'- ■ inm. Ir I I’I I^f.-r P-"11-: SI; ARCHITE TURE I ENGINEERING 11840 Va iv View Road. Eden Praine, MN 553-14 MailAd< .',5: Box 1243, Mmneap'ilK MN Telepho. e; 6l2-828-»500. FAX: 612 December 28, 1990 Mr. Ron Quanbeck Minnehaha Creek Watershed Oistrict P. 0. Box 387 Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 oec RE:Rick's Super Valu Permit Application No. 90-168 Project Mo. 1006.13 Dear Ron: Herewith is a revised plan and calculations for the proposed addition at the referenced site. We have calculated the effect of two 24 hour 100 year storms on this site and the receiving sub-basir. The calculations show that the maximum flood elevation would be 940 The added runoff volume resulting from new roof and hardstand will be ^600 cubic feet. The proposed grading in the lower portion of the site will provide 8400 cubic feet below the 940 contour for flood storage. The plan has also been amended to show details of silt fence, inlet protection and catch basins. occasionally happens along Kelly Avenue. The plan submitted will not make the problem any worse. Very truly yours. Bruce R. Kelley, P.E. /j9 Enclosure cc:Kent Dahlen Jean Mabusth John Gerhardson Glenn Cook Neil Libson Lyle Fuller Rick Bloomquist r IK y- i-'- k*'r- CL Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates I 3c-fi:“: -t . r * ’? •/>* . . ^ 'i * -1 : 5 '? i :. . -e j: : »crr- C ' '* M tr- - : ■ * ^ 3o'(3C'' .V •>£ Vj « * >: • --C5 V'-Jt ' Oj-r-j-- ^5 ?cr-- - ^ 3*. c C ^.**:‘* Engineers S Architects Vc»-»e C • ^.teerv; ef 5 ac •' -I. £ -1 **'^t*. (I* * " = Ve « ^ >c C , Cai.%e-. VUh Vs * 2 .U-% *»€ ^* f> 5 f-'f- »£ . =”“ r j'eve ' *»£ SW-# : a ^-jrr A A V -*--, * : ? ^ ^•'Tris" *■ E c C .e' »ccf- » ::-et rgv A '.V:'-'- ^£ A t'^cuo^ -ec V V C le^ January 11, 1991 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Re: File No. 139«16uu Rkks Super Value JAN .« pA 5 1991 Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the proposed addition to Rick ’s super valae. Tlie storm sewer and access to the site are the signiilcant engineering issues. The stonn sewer problem south along Kelly Avenue cannot be solved as a part of this application review. This property contributes to the problem and would be e.xpected to participate in the cost of any future downstream improvements. The revised plan for Super Value dated 12/28/90 provides for an increase in the Kelly Avenue storm water holding area. The storm pond design for the increase in runoff from the proposed expansion is acceptable. The provisions for additional area to pond a portion of the runoff from existing development should be discussed. The City was concerned about the storm water runoff on the existing site as evidenced by the underdrain system that was installed. The benefit of expanding the existing ponding site diminishes if the City develops a plan to take care of the downstream problem. The site access is a concern because of this high traffic volumes on CSAH 15 and CSAH 19. Tliere should be some consideration given to moving the County Road 19 access south to the property line and the County Road 15 access onto Kelly Avenue. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Glenn R. Cook GRCli 139.cor 2Sli Wbtt KMehwav M • St. Paul. MIrwwtota SSI13 • 612-636-4600 IkMkL.. 1 OtlUiMlU// */MIIUniEHAH WATER£H£i- - T Box 3S7, Wavaata. Minnesota 55391 i / . « V r A ^ HMMVIMIMBIS: JdiniS R. Sp6n$ieyi Pres •JorinE Thomas *R'cnarcP Mitier MV! 0. Encl(Son • C fMmt Love • CUiKson unoiey • Thomas Maoie jr URt muNfroMRi il;: It V p"»lr. ■4‘-- #•I' wI tv-' . Ip m ‘'■li''h ', . m December 21, 1990Pormit AnpHcation No. 90-168; Applicant: Richard Bloomquist 3333 Shoreline Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Location: City of Orono, Sec. 2UAB Purpose: Stoimwater management plan for construction of an addition to a Super Valu store southwest of the intersection of County Road 15 and County Road 19. Dear Mr. Bloomquist: At the regularly scheduled December 20. 1990 meeting of the Board oi Managers, the subject permit application was tabled pending receipt of: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Hydrologic calculations projecting increased runoff volume caused by your construction for two 100-year frequency 24-hour duration storms. Revised plan with excavation providing storage below the projected 100-year frequency flood elevation of the adjacent basin equal to the increased runoff volume for two 100-year frequency 24-hour duration stonn events. Vouime calculations of excavadon to provide the additional stormwater storage. Revised plan signed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. Revised plan including erosion control installation detail. InfrMmaUon concerning the status of the City's ultimate plan for the subwaiershed. Review and approval by the City of Orono. These items should be received no later than January 7.1991 to ensure your permit application will be on the agenda for the next meeting of the Board of Managers scheduled for January 17.1991. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 473-4224. Sincerely. JAMES M. MONTGOMERY. CONSULTINO ENGINEERS. INC. En^hieen for the District cc: Ronald S. Quanbeck, P.E. bi Board file L-City of Orono Planmark r- s., h: f .—-• i -“5 ^ *' •*.•^-ik \ ■' J_ ___ u_ -, »___•_____•» January 4, 1991 THE Hs. Jeanne Mabusth CITY OF ORONO Building and Zoning Administrator Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN SS323 RETAIL^UPPORI ------HI5 SUPER VALU STORES. INC. P O BOX 1451 • MtNNEAPOUS. MN S5 m40 Bear Ms. Mabusth, During our planning commission meeting to expand Rick's Super Valu, the issue of vacation of Kelly Avenue has come up, I have researched this to a point, with Rick, our landlord, and the adjacent property owner, and have concluded that we do not want to be placed in the position of petitioning the city for partial vacation of Kelly Avenue. In discussing this with Dick Keaveny, he mentioned that in the 1975 time frame when this was proposed, the homeowters became so irate that several boycotted his drug store because they thought he was spearheading the vacation. Needless to say, no retailer wants anything to do with this sort of controversy. I have looked very closely at the "Avenue” and have trouble as to where the cul*de-sac would be placed. Access continues to be needed to the back of the Keaveny property, as business Is conducted in space on this lower level every day. *I have also noticed the school bus iv ^nuted on Kelly, and indeed many residents use this outlet onto County Road i'. I would also have concern *or timely police and fire protection to those residents off of Kelly Avenue. In my estimation, the feasability for vacation is remote. However, If there is something I do not understand, or Infoi'mation I do not have which Impacts on this vacation, I am willing to support the city on this Issue If they wish to vacate. I have discussed this with the land owner and also with Rick, and both of them would be supportive of the city if the vacation fits with your approved comprehensive city plan. Would you please provide planning and council members with a copy of this letter, so they understand our position on this matter as it rel'.tes to our expansion proposal presently before I’he city. Thank you for your Interest in this matter. Sincerely, LyTt V. Fuller Assistant Manager Retail Development ■1 r,. f.. £ /f Planning Commission Action Notice #1600 November 27, 1990 Page 2 receive final direction until later in 1991» possibly the meeting of the Council on January 20, 1991. Staff will keep you apprised of the status of that request. The City Administrator has advised that he may seek further direction from the consultant planner for the City, John Shardlow. Please contact above directives. office if you have any questions pertaining to the As of this writing, staff has not re da preliminary report from the City Engineer. In earlier discussion. xth Cook, he advised that he could not confirm that runoff from the addition will be offset by retention facility as design/specs, etc. had not been provided. Staff will send a copy of his report within the next week. Isv . & L /f CXTT OP ORONO P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, NM 473-7357 55323 ZONING PILE #1600 NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Notice: 11/27/90 I it [ TOs Richard Bloomquist 3333 Shoreline Drive Oronor MN 55392 COPIES TO:MGT Company Martin Ehlers, President P.O. Box 437 Redwood Falls, MN 56283 Bruce Kelley Planmark P.u. Box 1243 Minneapolis, MN 5544C Lyle Fuller Super Valu Stores, Inc, P.O. Box 1451 Minneapolis, MN 55440 TTPB OP APPLICATKNf: Variances/Conunercial Site Plan Review DATE OP TING: 11/19/90 VOTE: 6 For 0 Against Plaaaing rii—lniinn reconendn the following: .f r Tabled for reasons noted below. R0TB8 AMD 8PBCIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Side street setback on west side is excessive. Applicant la asked to relocate trash compactor to east side of building. 2. Applicant is to provide detail on retaining wall and west elevations and south elevations of retaining wall. 3. Provide elevations of building to include receiving dock. 4* Applicant is encouraged to submit an addendum to respond to suggestions made by staff to limit use of parking area for special sales, etc. Some members felt the 26 stall variance excessive, others had no objections. In general, it was staff's understanding ^hat the Planning Commission asked you to consider a reduction in the size of the expansion in order to minimize impact on adjacent residential. Please provide in that same addendum, additional supportive infonsation regarding need for the specific size of this addition. In addition, staff would recommend that you document the reasons as to why the receiving dock cannot be relocated on the east side. The Zoning staff has discussed proposed vacation of Kelly Avenue at the north end and comprehensive storm sewer improvement for the Kelly Avenue watershed. The City Administrator will seek further direction from the Council regarding a comprehensive look at the Kelly Avenue area to determine suitable location for a cul-de-sac and the types of storm sewer improvements that may be considered. The City staff may not be able to m -r cr ■•V f&u... iSKftTTliiill ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 19, 1990 ZONING FILE #1600-RICX*S SOPER VALO CONTINUED^ w W W w ^ W W ^ ^ ^ — - from the intersection are restricted by cars slowing down for signal at the County Road 15 and 19 intersection. There are issues that would need to be addressed such as emergency vehicle response time. This issue would be a separate vacation application. I believe it makes sense.” Johnson said, *'I too think it makes sense. I think it would make this setback Variance a bit more palatable if Kelly Avenue were vacated.” Mabusth added that there would also be more room for parking if Kelly Avenue were vacated. Chairman Kelley said, "I think we should proceed with this application with the premise that the roac is not going to be closed.” Johnson said, "It would be possible for Mr. Bloomquist to petition the City to vacate Kelly Avenue. That is an option available to him." Chairman Kelley asked how long a vacation process would take to complete. Mabusth replied, "If it is Mr. Bloomquist's wish to pursue the vacation, it would be possible for the Public Hearing to be held at the January Planning Commission meeting." Johnson said, “In my opinion, the vacation ot Kelly Avenue is required if the Super Valu ey'ansion is to occur." Bellows, Moos, Hanson and Cohen concurred with Johnson. Chairman Kelley said, "There i.' ii.j.tional information t.hat we need in addition to the vacation. We need to see the elevations, sketch plans on screening and retaining walls, and the design for the retention pond. It will be necessary to consider what impact on drai.nage there may be if Kelly Avenue is vacated." There were no comments from the public and the Public Bearing was closed. It was moved by Kelley., application #1600, Rick's Super Motion carried. seconded by Moos, to table Valu. Motion, Ayes-6, Nays-0. - 7 - iiii ?i.. K. V. &■W- i:. t'v K ,s A isi- -V^ ORONO planning commission meeting NOVEMBER 19 r 1990 file #1600-RICK'S super valo continued of'ttie building as well. Mr. Bloomquist said, "Thsre is currency grass on the _ 30' uj_j[^2.. If tne expansion took place on tne southeast side or the building, it would be necessary to blacktop a portion of the hill." Bellows asked whether it wouxc be possible to locate the addition further north on the east side of the building. Mr. Fuller stated that there are utiu.ity issues along the east side of the building. He said, "It is very e-xpensive to move the utilities. v^e had initially looked at t.hat and decided that it would be cost prohibitive to expand on that side of the building." referred the Planning Comitission ,to the sketch of the interior layout of t.he store. He said, "The proposal before you this evening is the plan that will best work with the gxisting layout of the store. V7e to realize that there is a problem with the elevations alone tne southwest side of the building. We will need to address the Fire Code requirements. The addition will also include a trash compactor." Bellows and Chairman Kelley asked what level of noise wi-i be generated from the trash compactor, how many times a day it will operate, and how often it will need to be picked up. Mr. Bloomquist replied, "I am estimating that the trash would be picked up once a week. The compactor will probably function six or seven times a day. am not sure what the noise level is.” Chairman Kelley asked whether it would be possible to relocate the trash compactor to the east side of the building. Mr Fuller reolied, "That may be possible. With regard to t.he noise issue, please reme.mber that t.hv* Keaveny building is between Rick’s and the residential area." Mabus^h depicted for tha Planning Commission xesidentiax area is located in relation to the properties. where the commercial Johnson asked whether it would be realistic to dead-end Kelly Avenue with a cul-do-sac. Mabusth said, "Nearly all residents from that area, to which I have spoken, have indicated that they would like Kelly Avenue closed off as a through road. Tne access is too close to the intersection of County Road 15 and 19. Attempts to move west - 6 - f K' i!' r ^fr - ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 19, 1990 ZONING FILE #1600-RICK'S SUPER VALO CONTINUED building is 14' nign. That is a very steep slope coming from a very high retaining wall. The retention pond is deceptive because it is really very shallow. The building elevations is an important element that we are currently lacking." Mabusth concurred that the proximity of the retaining wall to Kelly Avenue may pose a problem not only from a drainage aspect, "but also from a safety standpoint. Mr. Bruce Kelley stated that there would ba a railing completely around the retaining wall. Bellows stated that she did not think such a proposal would be aesthetically pleasing to the residents living in that area. She said, "I am also concerned that we are being asked to approve intensification of this building in the one corner that is facing and nearest to residential property." Mr. Bruce Kelley stated that screening is proposed for that ■f.. fi' - -fc:, ik: i. if V t Bellows said, "I would need to see what is proposed. I am having a difficult time imagining how screening can occur wit.hout the benefit of terracing." Chairman Kelley asked wny it would not be possible to construct a retention pond with more deptn. Mr. Bruce Kelley replied, "That is a possibility. There is a City water main running through that location which may restrict the depth." Chairman Kelley said, "The City ordinances require that drainage from a property be handled by that property. Because of the great amount of blacktop on this property, that is not being done. I believe that the proposed retention pond should be constructed to more effectively handle runoff currently coming from the property, not just that coming from the addition." Bellows stated that three-quarters of the retention area could be deepened without interfering with t.he City's water line. Mabusth asked the Planning Commission to consider whether they would recommend approval of expanding the receiving dock on the southeast corner of the store. Chairman Kelley replied, "I would feel more comfortable with the southeast corner of the store because the bank is located on that side." Mabusth noted that there are steep elevations on that side - 5 - OROIIO PLANNING CCiml&^lOH MEETING NOVEMBER 19, 1990 Cohen stated intensification of parking stalls. that the Flan W « 4 proposed. iz IS consider an ding in conjunction wich a decrease in had ^ O sa.me concern, b ut question w whether the applicant has done an occupancy survey. Bellows said, "Parking formulas are just tnat. I cannot say that I have ever driven by Rick’s Super Valu and seen the parking lot full. I am not certain that decreasing the parking stalls is a real issue.” Chairman Kelley asked Mr. Blocmquist whether his lot is used for parking by bus riders. Mr. Bloomquist reolied, "I know of two people that use the parking lot for that purpose. If it begins to pose a problem, I may have to ask them to use the public parking across the street. Up until now, there have been no problems." Johnson stated that he concurred with Bellows. Cohen stated that he was not aware that tne rarely filled and that he too agreed with Bellows should not be an xssue. parking lot that parking Chairman Kelley stated that drainage is the next issue to address. Mr. Bruce Kelley said, "We are proposing a retention pond by constructing a dike, retaining the existing vegetation, and p^^g^fving the vegetation between the bituminous and lot line. also proposing to replace vegetation in kind to screen the pond. There will be approximately 8,000 cubic feet of additional storm water storage in the pond. The increased drainage resulting from the addition will be approximately one-fourth of I have reviewed our proposal with Ron Quanbeck at the Watershed District. His concerns center on t.he storm water the recommendations were instituted. lands. The expansion will not inc decrease the 100-year runoff level 1/lOth of a foot." none> of f no and low and may area by 1 to be the - 4 - if :r '■t fe. !:■ r-r II II-' R-v: OBOyo plAHNIIIG commission meeting NOVEMBER 19. 1990 (U ZONING FILE #1600-RICK'S SUPER deliveries would Chairman Kalley askes wnar -imes o. . . . . be liKely to occur. e, . - I* * - ce*'iverv should b© in Mr. Bloomquist "“ies ta Ihe west side of the and out by 11 = 00 a.iti. bv 10:00 a.n. The first building will probably or'8:00 a.n. The west side ^;^isr^rild7n “g^ V“ ^*Ted t- - - -V a“"^efht^^^e?tira I2ire"*do''oh\\readr=n"thL siJe of-Vhe building." ••The oroposal is to br^na thau dock Sot«"o “he VropSm line end the residential area." ••"’his is not as intense as it appears. We - h^rs-^-hlre-i^-no interference with customer parking vaii»v sareed that customer parking might make it Chairman Kelley agreea leave the premises,difficult for the semi-trailer truck, to leave tn ? a us .a 4.vaa> ovis-ino aod proposed drainage Mabusth v^busth’^s memo dared November 16,J?L°“o7o“o<-“”7 (s« yeaVne Mabusth's lieno dated November 16, for t.he •••he C’tv Encineer 1990). .ddress cannor. confirm tnat tne 1990). Mabusth said, "drainage from the S5rtn^«:“sri2siir^spectftcati^ S:S!=.Wha"ffil% “of "“fp^rnit'application has not yet been completed.“ Cohen recollected that i" '2!.™ t”” Kell? •ignif leant concern expressed about -ainage Avenue residents. Mabusth confirmed Cohen s statement.. Cohen stated that he was surprised that there were no Kelly Avenue residents present this evening. Msbuath noted that the only "who from a resident on the north added, "That property S2SSr!r‘nori«UV«a'':?%hV’’d%".*?n°a^ from this property." in th;"'.vVnt “^S2 "c'itV“Vng“ e.r“;c«ni?«* t’ria't ° th.”p?o?«SI retention pond will not work. . r _j ’•Staff is recommending that no action be .kanlS"?:;?. '»?«« untfr Judh “issue, are resolved ." - 3 - i#::; , \ oM ■Tryh' ''t tvh- OKONO PLAHHIHG COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 19, 1990 S0H1M6 FILE 11591-FISHER CONTINOED ^ _ There «ere no coonenrs rrom -he P“°j“ - * application and the Publi: Hearino was e.ose.. -1. n 1. n ^chi 3 It was moved by f*f°"°f‘*.i’/wil!5°wer!t^°at"'3 300 Fox approval iV=o^enVatiVn3’7n7"Sased on the need fortwh grading to improve drainage conditions. Motion, Ayes-6, Nay»-0. Motion carried. #1600 RICK’S SUPER VALO - 3333 SHORELINE DRIVE variamce/commercial site PUBLIC HEARING 7s07 P.M. TO 7:51 • * . Bruce Kelley, L?”“fS?;«, RJlre«ntative tor Super' Valu. were present. o# of WdT0The Affidavit of Publication and we. . .a — duly noted. Mabusth reviewed the -^"o°e”thai°\.he* adVitloii°wUBlooiaquisfs application. Jhe said, So-e ^ lo- of extend from the To a »=eiving docic that is the west lot line. *his^ .s ^ . to a 45 foot addition. proposed at “r,! now man'v o'arkinc spaces had been “rS aVrre^^it^o^npcradinrcpunty Road 15. lost. Mr. Fuller stated that approximately 15 to 20 spaces were . £ u; of ^*16 Suo^T Valu prop6^tiy Mabustn proviaed a "jVanne Mabusth's memo datedand previous applications (see oeanne miaous November 16, 1990). Chairman Kelley asked if ’t''eninc°°*“^Close to Super Valu were present this evening. There were none present Chairman Kelley expressed ”J“f4"Vst* sidt’ofmay be generated from the receiving dock on -he west sia building. Mr Fuller stated that the plan is to split the system for the *tore. «« 1 Because of the side of the building woul -f deliveries would beinternal layout of the store, some of - made on the west side." - 2 - 1; PBRSPBCnVE VIEW HLiiaiMflRM AACHrnaiM 1INGBIIOIWI lliAVtllrf V||««m4 MvttaMi .Mli HIM tl«i. MU. tMM Ml^aMtOi P«» il]«M4l«l T«<M RICKS NAVARRE. MN.pU •“ irit. -io POSITION PAPER Subject: Point: Receiving 0oc< Use and Noise Issues fy. ? V' I,' •i fi . ' ffi.k L > ' ■ • r > M ' '';r. Tht additional receiving door on the west side 1s needed to accomplish efficient receiving of goods In this supermarlcet. The design of the old store goes back to 1974. It has a very outdated receiving design and does not allow for the quick handling of product that is needed in the present supermarket envi roniMnt. An additional door cannot be put In place on the east side of the building due to design and topographical constraints. We would have to move a11 our electrical panels, which would probably cost $40,000 ■*>. Because of the elevation and space constraints of the lot, we would not be able to place a second delivery door and compactor on the east side. We have designed the retaining wall on the west side of the building to serve two purposes. First It will serve as a wall sheltering the truck well and •Iso serve as a retaining wall. Secondly, it is designed to shelter the compactor and will be used as a noise barrier. The compactor noise, when It is cycled, provides a very low level hydraulic hum. which will not penetrate into the adjacent properties. The truck noise of backing Into the delivery well will be very mlnloml. In fact, 1 feel the car, bus and truck noise from county road 15 will be heard much more than our delivery vehicles. These Issues have already been cddressed in the zoning process wisely done by the City of Orono. We have a classic case of coiimercial property adjacent to multiple dwelling property which shelters the homes from the retail businesses. Please see attached drawings. iW-in‘ #* _____ C(^;3RI «* 7 r^. "1 |nMU»>4 f»vj i( r*"*?*—I iXV" » J! r I V l‘ •'9 0*I V 1‘ #•1 ••V /1 #1 •-. «h#« « J I ! I M. i»> #i» n u hBrr » »««>#^i4e4Jr rMmtp W»«%%% iM Ki>f Ik m *OT *i^f 14 14«•• Mi^V «4 §m^r ••U M «• u t#t MhM II It 1^ i^iMT MM 1#!• ^0^ i^4r l«4#il{. N 44»-» MW 4M4 i0L0 m»^9 •44 »lif M^l 14 «% MVI 0€t « «»4 4 44 • « *4 44 swe cj^TA Ito if4«« ««• 4t •f#^ m^m 4Ati» tt «Hti.\«M<t c^r/> •i»4«. «r M «»4« A4Mir 4«4^ •4 k« MW t 44 4« MP WMW 44 %4Mr 4»« H r X ApprnOr*|«4>r h i* 2^— ; -1 —L luwr tic^: ir>.p> ^1 41 ’ Ae ^ ra J^^-pnM 1 i y M k'fi^m^i: ffi-p* / 10 n^fs^i e>jn>o /1/ p*f T»^ j-Ttei» 1 r\ 1 n \ t etf^ob^ iM u>*c^H ^ ahon Ktv4 ttiLciipe^T V p^fK* »f ^vlr itert irt£j £ 0Lo» Q^eeV. y- 1^'r * J . i ‘ *• ^]r[ ■: HimyMtfiMN '•mIMAi RICK'S NAVARRaMO IVM-^ PI s» Aj msPBcnvE VIEW HLilf\l/l/tnRK inm Vftiirf vte* KmI M tM UU Ha »PHMv. MN. »|1M IM y»tn>i All «3»4MD t— 411 t214N| RICK’S NAVARRE. MN 1114 <lo h> ec 1^ POSITION PA‘-£R Subject: Setback Variance Point:Is West Side Excessive Our position is, the request for variance is not • es^ive. With a B-3 zoning the setback required is 60 feet. The major part of jur expanded building to the west is still 30 feet from the property line, in-s distance should be very adequate and not obtrusive to the commercial development to the west and other adjacent properties. The only portion of the addition which gets closer than 36 feet to the property line is the receiving area appendage which accommodates a delivery door and compactor. This area, for a short distance of 12 feet, parallel to the lot line, is 10 feet from the property line. Also, it is our understanding, that according to the Navarre portion of Orono's comprehensive plan, this is where additioncl retail sales development should be placed. Please see attached drawing. if .* ^ EROSION CONTROL FENCE M w1 ^ Z ? ^ 2 5*.:65^' < w 6’ TOPSOIL AND SOD RETAINING WALL §W/U'^--Z' iWmfrC* ^- RVeif WEST iE 5? LO'^’ L BLOt'ii i /'.• TOWNSii - LAMt»D0M PARK-----10 ■aft*>efyj. ^ ‘ REPLACE CLEARED FOLIAGE WITH NATURALIZING TREES AND SHRUBS nLftrvii/uiRK 'iBMoaitnio ax fMii.MN. 33944 MN. 99440 ED OU TlET ^ -pAHfT 6' TOPSOiL AfID SOD 1 \ ... V. ^^ J C r I f W POSITON PAPF.R Subject:Parking Point:Ratio to Square Footage of Building The proposed parking for this supermarket is adequate. At Super Valu we are very careful with our parking ratios and their impact on business. Ratios can be manipulatcj by size of drives, size of stalls, how the retail space is Measured, etc. At Rick's Super Valu, we have designed and are proposing total parking of 110 parking stalls. On our design, we have 9 foot wide stalls and 22 to 30 foot drive aisles, which provides for very free and easy movement of vehicles. Prior to the county condemnation to improve the intersection of 15 and 19. we had a total of 122 parking stalls. Due to the condemna^ 'n and expansion, vm have only lost a total of twelve parking spaces. Th>, parking lot has never been filled and has provided the customers adequate park'ng. With the building addition and some extra business, the parking will still be adequate with 110 places. It Is my understanding the City of Orono uses r:cchod "C" on the attachmeU which requires 127 parking stalls. We are able to provide 110 spaces. A variance of 17 parking spaces does not impact our business or the citizens of Orono. Please see attachment and drawing. IftSf r, V 1^' H'. r % t:'' i % II'.I ' ■ -.li. ‘ m ':- f^yI PICK'S - SUPER VALU NAVARRE Thf following analysis Is proposed as it relates to square footage of the supermarket and the need for required parking as per ordinance. HCTHOO "A* Store Total Square Feet 6 stalls per 1,000 s.f. of building NETHOO "B“ Store Total Square Feet Arbitrary 70* of space 1s sales area 150 s.f. of sell to 1 parking space HETHOO 'C- Store Total Square Feet Less the following non-storage/ nonuseable sales area: Vestibule Heat Work Room Mop Room Mop Room Produce Prep Back Hallway Deli/Bakery Prep Deli/Bakery Storage Lunch Room Restroom Office Manager Office Cashier 13' 19' 5' 5' 36' 5' 16' 4' 10' 12' 6' 5' X X X X X X X X X X X X 33'6" 30' 5' 8' 16' 24' 46' 9' 17* 17' 10* 10' total ’horefore; Reduced Area 150 s.f. per Parking Stalls LVF/dt 22,206 s.f. 133 stalls 22,296 t.f. 15,600 s.f. 104 stalls 22 206 s.f. 435.5 722.0 25.0 40.0 576.0 120.0 736.0 36.0 170.0 204.0 80.0 50.0 s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. 3,194.5 s.f. 19,091.5 s.f. 127 required stalls ^■v‘I ;5;. ir K\ r- I ‘I ^ « • ;t- i1 *« I »»l Ca-RD. 15 '• V• • -— CO to « *«fl«»l« widih •lAtHIM M um C t«Alf » «iti*%rtM iivM 4 • **0 N4M4I. IMfti J Mm«a M llo iM «i vaean'XASSv^. 0 «0 n iMtl / ih \ 0 4’ '■• *1 ■'. •.■ \ •.' ■*‘'v ?• . / . w*' ?fr ' -' % > 11 r ' -\" »m\ '•:' s\ i M \ 'v' - - »««Ciltr llf»nO!4 PAKK I a i ^=1^. \'\V\V'V^wr. .,-■ t'.V'.-VV'W- ♦•••"“•••n.7.fi i K, s 7rnff.*y ‘"""“'"“ < .tic Vof'iUlw’.ii I* I'l: I »i '• I HM -i ^ \ I ► ' POSITION PAPER Subject: Pol nt: Variance Request Reasons for Approval We feel we meet the criteria for a variance. We have Identified that on this commercial parcel a unique situation exists. We cannot expand to the front of the store as It would severely reduce parking. We cannot expand to the east of the building because of topography Issues and present store design Issues. Topographically we have elevation problems ana a lot line angle which precludes us from designing a cost effective and operationally sound building addition. This leads us to our present request. To be allowed to expand our business to the west on our parcel with a variance. On this parcel we also have a hardship which runs with the land. Our lot, unfortunately, has steep slopes to contend with. Is next to an existing city street structure, and Is located In an area where the city has not provided a drainage system to handle water run off for a large area. All these are Impacting on the cost of our project. We are willing to absorb these costs and with a variance will expand and grow our business In Orono. Rick's Super Valu needs an opportunity to grow In your city. We :.:pe the city officials understand our request and look favorably on our project by granting a variance so we can proceed with our project. See Attachment. ^ # LAND OSB PLANNING - ZONING 7ARIANC2 APPLICATION (KeeD this p3C6 fcr your inforrnatioR) THB lONING CODB is a set of regulations and performance standards aimed at the orderly development and use of land within Crono consistent * with the goals of our Comprehensive Plan. The attempt is made to balance existing land use against ideal situations. The code is the law. r VARZAHCB is the procedure established to modify the strict enforcement of the letter of the law. A variance may be issued by the City Council upon finding that a unique situation exists, that strict enforcement would cause an undue hardship, and that the end result would be within the intent of a Comprehensive Plan. A HARDSHIP MUST BB DBMOHSTRATED BY THB APPLICANT. The hardship must be unique to the land in question, or to a small area, it cannot be a common situation- The hardship must run to the land. Exampxes are steep slopes, Xaices or wetlands, large trees, existing structure locations, and unusually shaped or sized properties without adjacent vacant land. C A VAHIAHCB CAHHOT BB ISSUBD to satisfy the aesthetic or economic desires of the applicant; to simplify design or construction; to affect any building ^•qulrements; to permit any land use not alxowed within the zoning ^s^rict; when the requested use can be located somewhere on the property without a variance; or if the result will in any way affect the public health, safety or general welfare. IROCHDORBS require filing a complete application with the Zoning Administrator 25 days before the Planning Commission at their regularly scheduled meeting on the third Monday*. Neighbors are notified and invited to attend the meeting to make relevant comments. The City Council dc«s ask that applicants have surrounding property owners execute an acknowledgement form (copies attached to this application) providing written confirmation that each owner has been made aware of the application. Please note this acknowledgement form does not seek approval or disapproval of an application. The Planning Commission reviews your request, establishes f^ets, and makes a recommendation to the City Council. The Council will then review the recommendation and approve or deny the application. The following information, when applicable, is required to complete the ▼ariance application : 1. The required Certificate of Survey must designate all current and proposed improvements. (•) See attached sheet for additional meetings and deadline dates. (CVEH) ( r\ fe- I- I- I ( m -^ r,-e Mi.-.'lAEX.. lift! MlNMTOMli MU $'i£T. P.O. Box 387, Wayzala. Minnesota 55391 tlMH If HOliftfifJdfiie$ H Sp«05i«;y rf«b • Jotin £ Thonus • R«cr.ar«3 R M '<tr M m 0 EfCKson • C Woudrodf LOve • lindiey • (homas Mapte jj IAN 2 4 ^ •”5-* W- January 21, 1991Permit Annlication No. 9U-I6H; Applicant: Richard Bloomquibi 3333 Shoreline Drive Orono.MN 55392 Location: CiiyofOrono. Sec. 20AB Purpose: Siomiwaier manugenieni plan tor coiiiUiiciion ol an addition to a Super Vulu store southwest ot ilie iiiterseciioii ol County Road 15 and County Road 19. Dear Mr. Bloomquisi: At the rejjularly scheduled January 17, 1991 meeting ot ilic Board of Managers, the subject peimit application was tabled pending receipt ot; 1. Stage/slorage relationship tor ilie propv>^ :d area ot storage for the existing condition and after the proposed excavation sliowuig a net increase of storage capacity below elevation 940 as calculated. r » j _i. j 2. Revised plan including a restoration note providing tor revegetanon of all disturbed areas with seed and mulch or sod. 3. Revived sump manhole detail providing 4 feet ot sediment storage capacity. 4. Review and approval by the City of Orono. These Items should be received no later than February 11, 1991 to ensure your permit application will be on the agenda tor the ne.xt meeting ot the Board of Managers scheduled for February 21,1991. Should you have any questions regarding iliis matter, please contact me at 473-4224. Sincerely, JAMES M. MONGTOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS. INC Engineers for the District Ronald S. Quanbeck, P E. cc:BoajrifUe cdWol[y of Orono B. Kelley. Planmark /PUII\l/MfllRK ARCHmCTURE I ENCLNEERING 11840 Vtllcy View Road, Eden Prainc. MN 553-u Mail Address: Box 1243. Minneapolis. MN >5440 Telepbonr 612-828-4500. FAX: 612 828-4743 January 28, 19S1 JAN 3 0 1991Mr. Ron Quanback MInnahaha Craak watershed District P. O. Box 387 wayzata, MN. 55391 RE: Rick’s Super Valu NAVARRE, MN. Permit Application #90-168 Project «1006.13 Dear Ron: Enclosed le the revised plan PS-i, latest date January 22, 1991. This revision Includes: 1, A note to restore disturbed areas with seed and mulch or sod and 2. A 4 foot catch basin sump. A stage/storage table is enclosed based on our earthwork caicui^ :'ons. The Orono Planning Commission approved the plan January 22 and referred our request to the City Council. Very truly yours. IHARK Bruce R. Kelley. P.E. BRK:hJp Enc. cc:Kent Oahlen ^ Jean Mabusth («nc.) John Qerhardaon Qlenn Cook (enc.) Lyle Fuller (enc.) Nell Libaon Rick Bloomquiet 100ei3cs 6TA.6 / 4TOT AaCNRICTUM IINONURMC 3ToP*»AA c <^u.rT. eutVATVOU gXl^TlK>d»P cnJS uoPSO 1 Cl AlU t 7, felO 12, A (a 0 1 4-, SHO t, “^ZO 5*. ^8 0 •i.ffrO ToTAu «J40 1 7,6,4op •m IMLM MNSS440 • fM:«tl«M?<a OAvJA^?-C ~ ^Alu RusJoP'r '* STovVACfC C-A*-c'^ I'HOItCT NUMHCM \ c^rj - t * ^1I 2 Of 2- wsi^ I J TViE__,,_______ RETAllrSUPPORI February 1, 1991 FE3 4 1991 SUPER /ALU STC3RES. INC. • m ■ ^ ^ ^ ^ P 0 BOX 1451 • MINNEAPOUS. MN 55440 Hs. Jeanne Habusth City of Orono Building & Zoning Administrator P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Ns. Nabusth. I wish to address our mutual concerns end Interest on Rick's Super Valu expansion proposal In regards to our existing accesses Into the supermarket. In further reviewing this subject with Rick and our engineering advisor, we would take the following position. The access on the easterly or County Road 19 side appears very difficult to relocate to the property line. We have some severe elevation problems which we feel would preclude us from having a functional drive for both automobiles and tr».ick traffic. We also feel the elevation problems would cause a safety concern for all traffic leaving and entering the property. Also, I believe a water line also runs along the entire property line on the south east side. The access on the north or County Road 15 side has been reviewed by us also. I was wrong In my statement at our last meeting that we wanted to leave the existing access In place. On the plan I have enclosed, you will notice we are proposing to move the access approximately 20 feet to the west, which should help the safety Issues somewhat. The city engineer proposed an access from Kelly Avenue Into our property. Again because of severe elevation Issues, we do not see this as a viable alternative. I do look forward to our on site '•evlew and meeting on February 7 to further discuss our accesses with all those concerned. Perhaps with additional persons Involved, we may discover other viable alternatives. Thank you for your interest in this matter. Sincerely, Lylt V. Fuller Assistant Nanager Retail Development cc: Rick Bloomquist / I Toi FroMs Dates Mayor Peterson & Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson 1 1 JAq, Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning February 4, 1991 fmoNo Subjects #1605 Dr. Richard Lindstrom, 1065 West B’erndale Road - Variance - Resolution Zoning District - LR-IA, Single family lakeshore residential, acre, sewered Application - Request for lakeshore setback, hardcover and average lakeshore setback variances to construct additions to existing residence List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - I. ^ - Discnasion Resolution Planning Commission Action Notice 01/23/91 Planning Commission Minutes 01/22/91 New Exhibits of 01/22/91 Please review the memo and exhibits of January 14, 1991. Briefly, the applicants propose to construct a second story addition above the existing residence, a two-level attached garage with a third level of living space, and a proposed pool. Variances required for this construction to proceed are as follows: 1. Lakeshore setback variance to allow construction above the existing residence within the 0-75' lakeshore set. nek zone. 2. Average lakeshore setback variance. 3. Hardcover variance. As noted in the memo of January 14th, the proposal results in a hardcover reduction in the 0-75' zone from the existing 36% down to 31.7%. Hardcover in the 75-250* zone remains at approximately 38%. dationPlanning Coaisaion At their January 22nd meeting. Planning Commission voted 3 in favor, 2 against, 1 abstention for approval of the proposal as revised. (Applicant's original proposal had been rejected by Planning Commission in November). The majority of the Planning Commission felt that the reduction in hardcover in the 0 75' tone, along with no expansion of the existing footprint in the 0- Zoning File #1605 February 4, 1991 Page 2 75' zone were justifications for approval. The minority opinion was that adding a second story to portions of the house in the 0- 75' zone would increase the visual intensity of structure near the lake, and that other possibilities exist for adding to the house without working in the 0-75' zone. Staff Reconendation Staff has drafted a resolution reflecting the majority recommendation of the Planning Commission. The approval resolution is attached for Council review. Isv A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO NUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIOrS 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 & 2 AND SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8 PILE #1605 WHEREAS, Dr. Richard Lindstrom (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 1065 West Ferndale Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1372, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 8, to allow construction of additions to an existing residence, such additions being located within the 75* lakeshore setback zone where no structures are normally allowed, and requesting a variance for hardcover in the 0-75' and 75-250' lakeshore setback zones for hardcover in excess of the amounts normally allowed, and requesting a variance for additional structure to be located lakeward of the average laJceshore setback line where no encroachment is normally allowed. NOW, TBBRBFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning Pile #1605 2. The property is located in the LR-IA Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on November 19, 1990 and tabled the request to allow applicant the opportunity to revise the proposal to more closely meet the City requirements. The revised application was reviewed by the Planning Commission on January 22, 1991, at which time the Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed variance as revised, based upon the following findings: Page 1 of 5 a) Approximately two-thirds of the existing residence is located in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone. Portions of the existing driveway are also located in the 0-75' setback zone. A variance to allow this house location was approved by the City Council on May 13, 1974. b) The construction of a second story addition above the existing residence but located entirely within the existing footprint of the building, will not have a detrimental effect on the character of the neighborhood nor significantly impact the visual character of the shoreline as viewed from the lake. c) The existing 70' encroachment past the average setback line will be extended upward, however, because of the protruding nature of the shoreline, neither neighboring property will have existing lake views decreased by such upward encroachment, nor by the garage and pool additions. d) In conjunction with removals of driveway and landscaping hardcover, hardcover in the 0-75' zone will decrease from 36% down to 31.7%. Further, proposed additions in the 75- 250' zone are generally over existing hardcover, and will result in no net increase in hardcover above the currently existing 38% in the 75-250' zone. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 5 CONCI.OSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2 and 10.55, Subdivision 8 to permit the construction of additions to the existing residence, including a second story above a portion of the existing house, pool, and attached garage, such additions encroaching past the average lakeshore setback where no encroachment is normally allowed, such construction comprising hardcover and structure in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone where no hardcover or structure is normally allowed, and comprising hardcover in excess of the 25% hardcover normally allowed in the 75“ 250* setback zone, subject to the following conditions; X. Hardcover in the 0-75* zone is approved at a level of 31.7%. Hardcover in the 75-250' zone is approved at a level of 38%. All existing and proposed hardcover approved for this variance approval is recorded in the calculation worksheet and diagram attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. The current property owner and all future owners of this property are placed on notice that hardcover shall not be increased above the currently approved level and any proposed improvements of this property that will result in additional hardcover must be approved by the City. Such approval may result in a requirement for concurrent equivalent or greater removals of existing hardcover. All existing hardcover scheduled for removal as a condition of this resolution must be removed prior to the footing inspection for the new construction. 2. Applicants shall adhere to the approved plans, and any. changes to those plans shall be subject to further City review. 3. The proposed lower garage floor shall be raised to meet the required 932.5* regulatory flood protection elevation. Applicant shall revise construction plans for the garage addition to accomodate this requirement, and shall provide elevations and a grading plan for staff review prior to issuance of the building permit. 4. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (February 11, 1992). Page 3 of 5 L '.^., 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code* shall automatically terminate any authority granted hereinr and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono city Council on this 11th day of February, 1991, ATTESTI Dorothy M, Hallin, City ^’.erk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 11th day of February, 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy N. Hallin, Mayor fc City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 r ZONING PILE NO. 1605 Qp ORONO NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION P.O. Box 66 n. ^ ^ .t ^ ’ ")->/Q'Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date ot tlotice; TOx Dr. Richard Lindstrom COPIES TO: Paul P. Bedker, 1065 West Perndale Rd 631 Fourth Avenue SW wayzata, MN 55391 _ _ _ _ _ _ TIPB OF APPLICATION: Variance DATE OF MEETING: 1/22/91 VOTE: 3 For 2 Against 1 Abstain FXsxuii.119 CoHBission recoBBends the following: Approval subject to conditions noted below ■OTES AMD SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Approval of hardcover variance to allow 31.7% in 0-75' zone, 38% in 75-250’ zone, as proposed. 2. Approval of average lakeshore setback variance. 3. Approval of 2nd story above portions of existing house in 0-75' zone as proposed. 4. Revise floor elevations in garage wing to meet minimum headroom/floodplain elevation requirements. 5. No additional hardcover will be approved in the future. Mote: At the meeting, staff indicated that the pool would require a 30* sntback. However, that statement was incorrect, since the poo^x does not exceed 1,000 s.f. in area. The pool as shown in revised pxan is acceptable at the proposed location. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: , City Council Monday, February 11, 1991: meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission ■Inutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and npproval by the Planning Commission. ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 22, 1991 ZONING FILS #1604-R000 CONTINUED four feet." 3ellows su^^esteci triec it rney be in Mr. Rooci s best interest to entirely forego t.be pillars. Mr. Rood asked wnetner he could apply for a Variance to have tne pillars five feet high. Kelley infornied Mr. Rood tnat ha had the right to submit a Variance application if he wished to do so. He said, "However, the Planning Commission has been fairly consistent in recommending that fences along public roadways be no more than 3.5 feet high." #1605 DR. RICHARD LINDSTROM 1065 WEST FERNOALE ROAD VARIAHCES CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING Charles Lindstrom, the applicant's brother, and Paul Bedker, the applicant's contractor, were present. Cohen stated that due to his professional relationship with Charles Lindstrom, he would abstain fr>om the discussion and voting on this matter. Kelley opened the Public Hearing at 8:45 pm. Gaffron distributed a sketch showing the revised roo: ^^ights and floor elevations. He said, "The applicants, for uhe most part, have revised their plan to keep hardcover out of the 0-75' setback area. The only encroachment in that area is above the existing house. Changes are still proposed for the 75-250' 3gtback area. ’ lere must be a 30' pool setback from the side lot line and I am c n 'ernec. .bout the elevation of the basement floor in relation to the f^ood plain." Mr. Bedker referred the Planning Commission to the sketch that Gaffron had distributed. He said, "You can see that the existing basement is below the flood plain elevation. v/e propose to construct the first level of the garage at the 932.6 elevation. The second level of garage would be at 939.11, which is approximately two feet above the existing main floor. The second floor addition would even out across the garage addition and the existing structure. 'Je are proposing to construct a brick planter, approximately 40' long and 2' high, outside the main entrance to accommodate the 2* difference in the garage elevation. The driveway will slope up that additional two feet along tne planter up to the garage." Bellows asked Mr. Bedker what the slope is coming out of the lower garage. Mr. Bedker replied, "We are proposing a 5i slope." - 10 - f* ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 22, 1991 ZONING FILE n605-LINDSTROM CONTINUED ^ ^ -e Bellows stated that tr.ere is on... abb ^.ea.a..^.. .o. -..e garage. Mr. Bedker replied, “That shou-i-s be - 6 . M 7" ^ •1 i- V a , . Q Q ' ^ ■ ’andBellows said, . ^ , construction of the tlcor, that weaves code allow a 6'o'' clearance?" 11** Will tne buildin Mr. Bedker replied, "I believe that 6'6“ is the mininur. clearance allowed." Kelley asked the Planning Commission to address the issue of the Variances requested. Rowlette indicated that she had no oosections. Hanson said, "I have no problem, but if there was a pro:ec that I did not think should be done, tnis qualities as one o them." Bellows said, "The pool at this point is located behind the garage structure. There is a deck on tne laKe side or the house. I am concerned that at some point in time, there wi..^ be anotne- hardcover request to connect the decx and pool. Hanson comolimented Me. Bedker tor his efforts -o a-^ress the issues involved with this property, but thouent that tne improvements intensify the use of Land, Bellows stated that this may be one of the properties in Orono that has reached it maximum level of development. She believed there were alternatives that could be explored. Moos stated that she would application, providing that hardco-ar proposed. look favorably on this not exceed t.he percentages Hanson asked if the encroachment into the average_lakeshore SQt^t^ack presented any issues with the sight lines of a jacent properties. Gaffron stated that he did not believe the second story addition would have an impact on the neighbors' lake views. There were no comments from the public and Kelley closed the Public Hearing at 8:55 p..m. It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Moos,^ to recommend approval of t.he hardcover Variance in the 0-/5 and '5-25U setback areas as proposed, in addition to the average laxeshor- - 11 - --- --- - ---— .. I ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 22, 1991 ZONING FILE I1605-LINDSTROM CONTINUED setback Variancs. Is is also recor“.endeG t:r.at tr.e app-ican„ be placed on notice that no additional hardcover will be allowed within the 0-75' or 75-250' setback areas. Moos asked if the Planninc Coirunission needed to address the one fooc ciscrepancy in garaje clearance. Kelley stated chat such an issue should be the Buildinc Inspector. uaziron noted than che pool» as proposed, does not 'meet ’ the the 3:' setback from the side lot line. Kelley stated that the pool should be constructed to meet that setback. He asked what homeowners do with the water drained from swimming pools. Gaffron stated that the City coes not allow pool water to be drained into the sewer or septic systems, but we restrictions about draining the water onto the yarn, Kelley asked if the pool must bo above the flood plain elevations. Gaffron statad that he woulc have to resear —n uhav, further. Motion, Ayes-3, Bellcws abstained. Motion carried. and Hanson, Mav, Cohen #1611 BRUCE a CAMILLE CURTISS 1920 FAGERNESS POINT ROAD after-the-fact VARIANCES Mr. Jeff Mohr was present applicants. reoresentative for the Kelley opened the Public Hearing at 7:23 p.m. and asked Staff to make a brief presentation. Gaffron summarized the information in his January 16, 1991 memo, noting that records seem to indicate that t.ne existing deck is approximately the same size and dimension as the pre-existing deck. Hanson questioned’whether the footings have been determined to be adequate. Gaffron replied, "The City Building Inspector would review that as part of the building permit process There were no public comments and at 7:25 p.m. Kelley closed the Public Hearing. It was moved by Hanson, seconded by Kelley, to recommend approval of the after-the-fact Variance for hardcover in the 0-75’ zone, conditioned on confirmation from the Building Inspector that the footings are adequate, and payment of a double fee. Cohen suggested to Mr. Mohr that he relate to Mr. and Mrs. Curtiss the Planning Commission's dismay of the manner in which deck constructio'’! was handled. .Motion, Ayes-5, Bellows, Nay. Notion carried. Eellows indicated that there have been past incidences involving this property a.nd that the applicants' actions were blatant and should not be rewarded. Cohen indicated that he reluctantly voted aye. - 12 - P:'- IDGE 96 L_ / i If ‘p\Avs,fc€JT‘c;,aca £^& ^ % %l ftOOIL nAM - Pcjoi. oex: K f'^t'CKT^ LlMt 2, To: Prom: Date Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Con’jnission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zonina Administrator January 14, 1991 Subject: #1605 Dr. Richard Lindstrom, 1065 Ferndale Road - Variance - Revised Proposal Note; This item was tabled at your November 19, 1990 meeting. Applicant was advised to come back with a revised proposal. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhitit E - Exhibit F - 1/11/91 Letter from Paul Bedker Revised Hardcover Calcs Revised Site Plan Revised Floor Plans/Elevation Views Notice of Planning Commission Action 11/26/90 Memo and Exhibits of 11/15/90 ry of Revisions - 1. Proposed pool has been relocated outside the 0-75' zone. 2. New two-level garage proposed, totally in the 75-250' zone. The third level (second story) provides living space above the garage. 3. Second story addition and lakeside deck proposed to be entirely within upward projection of existing walls of house. 4. 0-75' hardcover reduction from approximately 36% down to 31.7%, 75-250' hardcover remains at approximately 38%. Discussion At your November meeting. Planning Commission indicated to applicant that hardcover increases in the 0-75' zone would not be acceptable. The applicant was advised to consider revisions placing additions in the 75-250' zone. The applicant has redefined the 75' setback line per the staff sketch, and placed the pool and its deck behind the 75' setback line. Existing plastic liners on landscape beds in the 0-75' zone are to be removed, as is a portion of driveway in the 0-75' zone which would no longer be necessary. Af (A 4 Zoning File #1605 January 14, 1991 Page 2 Staff would question whether the ^ower garage floor as • Q70 r-<ann1a4-o’r\/ ^ LA X rw M.» ^ w..'— — - - - - - - ^ proposed wxll meet the required 932.5' regulatory floodproposea wx-lx meet xiic x c vj c* x i. ^ ^ ^ ^- - - - -j- - -— protection elevation. If not, the entire addition could he raised in a split-level fashion to accomplish this, but might create an unusual upper driveway situation. The second story addition in the 0-75* zone has been cut back to allow a second story deck above the existing house, so that there will be no new structural projecti'^’^s outside the footprint of the existing house. Staff RecoBBendation If Planning Commission feels that the proposed additions and hardcover revisions are appropriate, then a recommendation for approval could be based on: 1.Reduction in hardcover in 0-75' zone, no increase in hardcover percentage in 75-250' zone. 2.Additions above existing house justified by location of existing house in 0-7S' zone and no projections outside existing footprint. 3.Average setback variance justified by protuding nature of shoreline, with both neighboring houses having views totally unaffected by the proposed average setback encroachment. Conversely, if Planning Commission feels the revised request is not justified, appropriate negative findings would have to be made. Isv 'i TO 'jr> • • 1 ' ^ V V . _ \u January 11. 1991 Paul P. Badker. AIA 631 Fourth Avenue S. W. Faribault. Minnesota 55C21 Phene (507) 334-4771 JAN 1 1 1391 Mr. Michael P. Gaffrcn Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Mr. Oaffron: Re: Variance Application No. 1605 Boclosed you will find revised plans elevations and hard cover calculations for the proposed addition to the residence of Dr. Richard Lindstrem at 1065 West Pemdale Road in the City of Orono. Thera are several changes to the proposed addtion based on coiments at the Nevenber 19, 1990 meeting of the Planning Comniasion. He are proposing an addition to the north of the existing house on the e.xisting driveMay. This addition will have a two level garage with living guarters above. It is proposed that the existing east driveway will be laHered to provide access to the l-stall garage at the basonent level of the existing house. The west driveway will romin isichanged and provide access to the 2-stall garage at the first level of the existing house. The proposed second story addition to the existing house has also been reconfigured. The projecting dedc has been removed. The proposed ■emnd story dedc is over the existing structure and is narrower than the previously proposed deck. The intent of this proposal is to step the proposed second story addition back to minimize the visual encroadmnt sited in your report of Novenber 15th, 1990. The pool and patio are proposed on existing hard cover in the 75*- 250* zone. It is also proposed that all plastic sheeting underlaying landsc^ed areas on ths site be r«icved. L The existing hardcover in the O' to 75' zone is 36.0%. The proposed design reduces this hardcover to 31.7%. The existing hardcover in the 75' to 250' zone is 38%. The proposed design reduces ttds slightly. In light of these reductions in the hardcover on the property, the variance applicaticm is amended to seek a variance in the average lakeshore setback only. As you are aware, virtually the entire structure is within the average lakeshore setback. For this reason, any inproverrent to the existing house would involve an application for variance on this setback. If you have any questions on this matter, please contact me. AIA mmmsaak HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (ciscLE ONE75-250' 250-5CG' 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone A. House X 26»-Z-^O ..J • • • LENGTH X WIDTH S . r . !■ X S.F. X S.F. 1 X S . r . a. Garaoe X S 3 . r . r. Driveway X S.F. ; X S • r* • ( !r n* SinpwALK :<S.F,r 1 L k X S.F. [■ I--?X \ "Z-S.F. P-. k X S.F. l;-i p.Ianhscape X ss S.F.[AREAS UNDERLAIN BY :<S.F. r PLASTIC SHEETING X _s S.F. X S.F. G. Other >{ ,_ S.F. Total Hardcover i N Zone 3.^24- s.p. • Total Property Area IN Zone lO.-S-OOs.f, ( m ^>-^4 4 rB”) O, ^OO X inn - . HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEE' ‘ ■ AREAS UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING SE7BAC.K ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) Existing Hardcover in Zone 0-75' fTB-gu:750-500' 500-1CCO' AF='T A. .MniJ!^F ^ ;<i£ ^ length WIDTH X - 1 ' 3 . r . X = .. .. S.F. X = S.F. X “ 3 . F . QX = S.F. r. nptUFWAY X = (p ^7 ^ S.F. X M. f- •“- j . r , n. .*^ir!FWALX ^ X c«.o s.?. X = S.F. - X = E.C^AliB/uscx X = S.F. F.Landscape x = S.F. S.F. S.F. G. Other Xm ?< X Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone S.F. S.F. 0 Z~Z.4> S.F. OOO S.F. A i IC.Z24- i B Z"7. OCC> X 100 ^■7 e>o. % H, EAST tLEVATO.N; tOoTM eutVA,T«C>M Ult^T CUtVATl OKI ■,*• • V**. 11110111 NC>*.TH CutVATi<:>M 1V^x>' -------------------—---------- O I I * i 1 J ZONING FILE NO. 1605 Qp ORONO NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION p,0« Box 66 crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 TO: Dr. Richard Lindstrom 1065 West Ferndale Road Wayzata, MN 55391 COPIES TO: Paul Bedker, AIA 1978 Ashland Ave, «104 St. Paul, MN 55104 TIPS OF APPLICATION: Variances DATS OF MEETING: 11/19/90 VOTE: 5 For 0 Against c z . / • i. - ^. Planning Coamission recommends the following: Tabled for reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Planning Connnission indicated that they would not recommend approval of increases in hardcover in the 0-7 5' zone. Also, they did not offer unanimous support for the second-story addition over the existing house. Applicant was advised to consider revisions that place additions in the 75-250’ zone. Note also that the applicant would be well-advised to have your surveyor define the 929.4' shoreline contour. If you do not agree with the staff interpretation of the 75' setback line. Please contact staff at 473-7357 if you wish to discuss your procedural options. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the January 22nd meeting is January 11, 1990 or February 8th for the February 19, 1990 meeting. If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (473-7357). If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernh^’-dson Proa:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:November 15, 1990 Subject: #]605 Dr. Richard Lindstrom, 1065 West Ferndale Rd - Variances “■ Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IA, Single family lakeshore residential, 2 acre, sewered j^pplication ” Request for lakeshore setback, hardcover and average lakeshore setback variances. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey, Existing Survey, Proposed Additions Overlay (corrected 75' setback line shown) Survey Compilation, Average Setback Hardcover Calculations Proposed Site Plan Proposed Construction Plans Pertinent Facts - 1. Applicants propose to construct the following improvements; A) Second story addition above east half of hous^. B) Second story deck over east half of exiscing deck. C) Attached 4-stall garage. D) Convert existing attached garage to recreation room E) Pool and patio. 2.A significant portion of the proposed construction is in the 0-75* setback zone, including most of the second story addition over the house and all of the pool and proposed second story decks. 3.All of the proposed improvements except for a small corner of the garage, encroach past the average lakeshore setback line. VJ 7“ #_ ,r:r ► *, J -jr • - - r- ■ . ^ « t Zoning File #1605 November 15r 1990 Page 2 of 3 4. Applicant's surveyor incorrectly defined the 75' setback line f rom the current shoreline rather than the 929.4 contour. During a site inspection on 11/14/90, staff estimated the location of the 929.4 contour relative to the current 926.75 lake elevation, and the 75' setback has been redrawn by staff to indicate the corrected 75' setback. Detailed corrections have not been made to the hardcover calculations, although an estimated revision is shown below. In the 0-75' zone, the area of the zone slightly increases but the proportions of additional hardcover and additional non-hardcover do not significantly change the "before" and "after hardcover" percentages. In the 75'-250' zone, actual percentages decrease slightly because the 250-500' zone is almost eliminated. 0-75’ 75-250' 250-500' Reported Area(s.f.} 10,200 23,625 4,750 38,575 (0.09 ac) Estimated Corrected Area(s.f.) 10,500 27,000 150 37,650 (0.86 ac) Hardcover* Existing % 36.8 (36) 41.4 (38) 13.6 (0) Proposed % 53.1 (52) 42.2 (39) 13.6 (0) Allowed Hardcover 0% 25% 30% * Number on left is % reported by applicant; number in 0 is estimated % based on corrected areas. 5. The existing deck on the lakeside of the house extends 12' out and is about 2* above grade. At its closest point, this deck is 33' from the shoreline. A 12' wide second story deck is proposed directly above the east half of this deck. 6. The proposed pool and patio would be located entirely in the 0-75* zone in an area that currently is lawn and trees. Perhaps half of the existing pines would have to be removed. The 480 s.£. pool would be about 30' from the lake at its closest point, with the nearest pool patio being about 24* from the lake. Discussion - Only rarely has the City granted variances for an increase in hardcover in the 0-75' zone, and that has generally occurred only in situations were the lot is extremely small and there are virtually no other locations for additions. This project does not appear to meet those general guidelines, in that the lot is nearly an acre in area, and additions outside the existing footprint could easily be designed to meet the 75' lakeshore setback, in staff's opinion. Zoning File #1605 November 15» 1990 Page 3 of 3 Construction of a second story above the east half of the existing house may be justified merely on the basis that the house exists in the 0-75' zone* However^ construction of a second story deck above the existing deck and above the east end of the house will likely tend to increase the visual encroachment into the 0-75’ zone, whereas the existing low deck is lass obtrusive. Approval of the pool as shown in the 0-75' zone would require that the Planning Commission find unique hardships precluding any other options. Approval of that pool without such findings would be precedent-setting. The encroachment past the average lakeshore setback line by any of the improvements, will have little significant effect on lake views enjoyed by neighboring property owners. The view orientation of both neighboring properties is away from applicants' residence. Regarding the history of this property, there were a number of cabins on the property prior to construction of this residence in 1974. A variance was granted on May 13 , 1974 to allow a 40' lakeshore setback based on location of neighboring residences. A copy of the original application and Council minutes is attached. Staff Reconaendation - In order to make a recommendation for approval of the proposed variances. Planning Commission will have to find sufficient hardship and justification to support the request. If portions of the project can be recommended for approval. Planning Commission should establish the magnitude of any hardcover increases allowed and should clearly define the reasons for denial or approval of the various facets of the request. CITT OP OROHO -> VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ^ , ($50.00 per each additional variance)».Lj Renewal Variance Pee $100.00 (no change from original application)/^ After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ^ev-A Jo.\e. Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) \ i *7 •n I ’ /•*- c ^ ‘ 'r ‘C'vn W* c Vftv . - * •' . - - » • Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. V' ± V*ki« w ubi ft -r • vv V.- •. * VV .•u u ' - .. —• •w f N VAPPLICANT Phone (home)_-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (A (worlc) to*w V' \ A V - A V *w* ‘ b - Wi- •. «-w.* Name Address: zip; )C4~ IMHBR (if different than applicant) T^i". L-' Phone (home) A" TC> N Name Phone (work) Zip:Address: P’ev‘NA^M,\e city; 0>Tte>^o ______ ___ Date Property Acquired it /fJ^^ ^ (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT OSE OF PROPERTY ^ . Present Zoning District L-k^ “" \ An Present Use of Property I 'O Resid ir.Lial Other (specify) OBSCRIPTIOE OF R]Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail; r J ’< r:--- O *# ^?-2. flRZAECBS R] Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other Lot Width Front X Hardcover X Side 3 » ntL Rear) I HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical (jlifficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; ^ ~ • •______ _____________________________________________^21_____ OBSCRIPTION OF UIIUSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements;^_________________________________________________________ RBQOIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8*5**xll" for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8J«"xll''). Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8ij"xll"). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above lafoxmetiott has not been included. HPPLICAHT'S SIGMATDRB The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff tine not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of th.is application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and coz Applicant's Signature St of his/her knowledge. \o!zsh ODate wnrne sighaturb The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members^and .Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verification of %t\Ls/ rei Owner's Signature Date /t>. ^ S~‘ fcJ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Flanning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must he present at all scheduled xmwiew meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorised agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ■vs 84/) ( '363 . Ii^••‘^*'^T-. *♦*.. *.**.•'• x*t*. •' *• • .* j'•’vC ’’r/--‘/*"**-'* 3 mr^-rT^'*'W -.t *P- •*''t* — '’^.*/'•«»* %« ■■u^ii vm * ' ■ • *•• *• * « • T-“* ^ ♦ • “. ' * •'^ .* •♦ 5 >• • r»» I ..1 • ^ ; • •. • * r- r '**' ’ '' . MM MU 10/t«/90 HENNEPIN COUKTY PROPERTY INPORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OMCRS LIST REPORT NO. PI4SS401 PAGE 5MTCN OOt M 0E-117-ES AS OOOA OOOSO AOORESS UMSSIGNED OMCR NAME'; TANPAVI* NMC/MNM ♦ UMaSf N LQNRV NHMISr MNK HN C/0 TMBT REAL ESTATE ATN A NAMUETTE MLS Mt' S5A79-00SS 5« 02-117-23 AS 0005 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HENRY H SKARP HENRY H SKARP lOAS N FERNDALE RD HAYZATA HN 55391 38 02-117-23 A3 0006 00036 AOORESS UNASSIGNED LOUISE H LOHRY NORHEST BANK FM C/0 TRUST REAL ESTATE 6TH t MARQUETTE MPLS MN 55A79-0053 TAMPAYER . NAMi/AOM 38 02*U7-tS AS 0007 01080 FERNOALE RO N N N RHICSLER A J F SHIE8LER NILUAN N/JOAFME F SH1E8LER RO t FAR HILLS NJ 079S1 38 02-117-2? AS 0021 01065 FERNOALE RD M RAC LINOSTROM RICHARO L LINOSTROM 1065 H FERNOALE RD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 02-117-23 AS 0022 01055 FERNOALE RD N GERALD T HCCOURTNEY ET AL GERALD T HCCOURTNEY loss H FERNOALE ROAD HAYZATA MN 55391 MtCR NAME tAMPAVER' NAtC/AODR SO Ot-117-2S AS 0023 010A5 FERNDALE RO N S 8 R FOK S C 8 KATHERINE H FOX 1005 N FERNDALE RO NAYZATA HN S5S91 TOTAL BATCH 002 nooo7 r: • i t 0 • *! i .>• 7; u P^O » 1 I 1 1 » f -t i.f.i'l r I h ■( I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KN0HLE06E ANO BELIEF. i %r i' I i) ^05 DATE * \ • ^ I iIhI r ttM': r' , i‘. iiiTE- Pl_/\H f / I I * •\ » »* I i •% , ^1/ ’ u i'J• * * # \ \ ‘ « < \ » t L. _ ' I ,4 ./ f i / Qiyvr\.r,'d iQil HVAiKccrs V < / >n - 1 . .,-------------**-.-^1 0 u ,l 2.Ct:<^c/ I- ‘ / -a •V \ r" %, ^... »t il !rv :i! '‘In.. I j \ t>ec»C- . — . .— .s fuook, ?T_A.ri •• 1 e>T,, ii r t>cc.x- ./■ T*:» ^L..r>L / HI - r--------------------- ■■' ; —5 J . — __i . tL^r-vAr ^•« «- 1 D y''-r Liv /• IIINUTES OP A RBCULAR MEETIMG HELD rtAY 13, 1974 Paurun movad, Outlar aacondad. y marina landing llcanwStralay, 3236 North Shora D^^^a, be .eferr to tha Planning Cotiwlaalo"* Hotl® * Ayaa (3) - May* <0>• Dutlar aovad, Saarlaa 8 varianea to frod Aiabal, ^ ^ Road.^ for tho purpoaa of a which to atora hay with 2l*-.I!niISJd ”ith^ that thia warlanca will ha «Hawd wi« MW ehanaa of uaa from a raaldantlal and wlTStrStSra; which it la now currently, to a comrcial uaa in tha future. Motion, Ayaa (3> - «aya <0). A report waa praaantad to tha Council conaaming Shi ^thl^ooatatlonthat tha ataff la doing on the operation at tha currant time. The . aeeaptad aiid ordered to ha put on file. fro. theoada a progaaaa report on tha atorm water propoaal Md tha effort to allainata that are concamad with theirCity council accepted tha report and instructed S?aSff to lodk into tha laaua of property ■righta that may be involved if the drainage go from one watarahad dlatrict into anothor area, and to check with the Jlty Attorney and tha Engineer in regard to this natter. Saarlaa moved, Sutler aacandad. to grant a wmrianca to the 75* eatback for lakaahora property. thia eaaa ia tha fact that tha adjoining propartiaa are all cloaar to tha fehatit would bo roaaonnbla for Mr. HcCaffary to put hia houaa in liha with other houaea to tha left and right of oven though thoy aro not 75' back. Motion, Ayaa (3) - Maya (0). pptlar moved, Saarlaa aacondad, to approve tha final plat for Hr. tlcCaffary. Lota 5,. Its, 10, * 11, Hat 42760, north Shore ^ttaga Acraa. Motion, Ayaa (3) - Maya (0). Couneilman Ifalah arrived at tha Council Chambara at 9il0 P.M. PHq" J flTAN'C LAN0I5JC LlCntf^n 3206 North Shoo orivo V'AHlAMCn 440 Stubbs Baf toad SKI TOMKA 4690 Bayside bad I.D.S. PROPOSJfc Storm Hater Rgprt 6 Variance Sliaiartlcn VARXAMCB MeCaffery / / riNAl *'LAT 1065 Hast lioad ■V ^^* r:T! ' T * r ‘ ~ ^ _ -w.-.lLJL--i: iu.i . ScTSACK ZONE: (ci.siCLE ONE) 75-250' 250-500' 5C0-iCC0 Existing Harocoves in Zone Ors. !(T- A. House __ LENGTH WIDTH ^wo AvC»^tr4 aj 'QTV — X c*'.• ( •• t . *w B> Garage _ X /T c. D riveway / -r ^ 0. Sidewalk / ^. La N OSCAR E^il £jcsr <..<»/1 *r . X 4- / areas fj6iT ; It*-!*; uNoestJ^i^'; c: BY PLASTIC SHEETING 2i_ 6. Other Total Hardcover in Zone 4o^/'7c «lo^CcD Total Property Area in Zone vifc-ree "tzsz—^a 7 •'• •. (.S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S s. UL - jy - i ^ 11 * • ,V S.F. '■>> ' Z.S . r . S.F. j s. I! .c S.F. S.F. S.F. _ S.F. >'? S ^ S.F. S.F.S ;t7. .cOo X iOO ■.e % 1.9 1 ‘s t. 1HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET / 1 ScT3AC:< ZONE: (CIRCLE CNE) . Existing Hardcover in Zone J ^L<U"-wV^U V • A.H cu Sg -3 ^ •3 w— ^S.F. LENGTH • WIDTH ^ — X P -r —S.F. X S S.F. * X S.F. X S.F. B. C. 1 y S.F. Ho 1 VPV^AY y S.F. y S.F. D. :5inPWALK y S.F. y S.F. A•_ <* _y —S.F. e* pee?’ j V4«, i.t'.- Jatio / D eck X s 1 #i-S.F. — \ ^J ^ AiincrAoe y ^m ^S.F. areas UNDERLAIN ftV y S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING Y S.F. • Y S.F. 6. Other .X S.F. Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone X 100 .4^ (T}_2J-J T □ ^ S.F. A| Z^^S.F. [3 %b 3>. I HAHDC3VE?. CALCXATiC.N WGSKS:^' SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' E xisting Hardcover in Zone 250-300' 3G0-1GCQ' A.House or- AtiC -f LENGTH “IrVT*-;;c fc >• -'-"‘’-c<__ 3. Garage ,we; r-/i ^ DmvEWAr fci CA“!:-w,T* Mto 9i ftfit.0 n'Mrtucoj feffAi-UiC L«“ (5^' 0. S idewalk c E. Patio / Deck AleAtUiftU'T SiO^ u4sr oic 6«NC fowtb. c. I AwnsrAPP (A* — f •" ' AREAS ^ UNDERLAIN^ t > . BY ^ PLASTIC 6tr S»JO 6»>o 0*^ SHEET ING|^ q 6. Other c. /! r A WIDTH X ^ (y' Total Hardcover in Zone P^r/3^ A'^cy. Total Property Area in Zone 7S(s(r (■ S.F. S.F. S.P. S. F • S.F. S . r . S.F. S.F. S.F.• # I S.F. S . r .Stzmx I I J S.F. s. ^. S.F. S.F. S.F. __S.F. 9 7>93 S.F. S.F. m B Z'L&s£_ X 100 ■4/. 4__% k HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET S£T3AC;< ZCNE: CctaCLE CME; 0-/-25G-5G0' 5Cu-lCCG' E xisting Hardcsve .^ in Zone «• A. House .•X 1 s ', I- • • length WIDTH - — A ^ W X » • S' r \ <X .1 -r ^-3_a ' T -r ■ A X , \ - X . . • , Bt Garage _- X .m * \AC'Oe)<?c5 ' c. Driveway - X .a \ - X _ • • 0. Sidewalk _ X _a **r^ . X a 1 . X » 5 e. Jatio/ D eck . X a . S R. Landscape , X (jP « • 1 6. Z. s areas UNOERUIN BY X - S-S s PLASTIC SHEETING X - _ s • X •• - s. • .-----------—- G. Other X .- s. % - * Total H ardcover • IN Zone -°i ‘ua i. Total Property A rea in Zone -2*^ . • — in S 23>. (oZ.5 * lOfl - 4Z*^ULr S • r • St?! S.F. S.F. S.F. S,r. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F« S.F. S.F. % I. HARDCOVER CALC'JL j^TICN WORKSHEE' 'SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75“250' (^50-500' y5C0-10CO' E xisting Hardcover in Zone A. House LENGTH WIDTH S.F. S.F. . X S.F. _ X S.F. S.F. B. Garage _______ c. Driveway S.F. 0. Sidewalk E. P atio/ )ec:< F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING •"10 S.F.„.o . r . / I ^ S.F. S.F. •1 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 9^50 A\/b 6. O ther Total H ardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone S.F. S.F. Also S.F. H6 ^B AIS^X 100 S % ; *vr HARDCOVER C.ALCULATICfl WORKSHEET ScT3Ac:< ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250 ( 250-500' J500-1000 Existing H ardcover in Zone / Y’r A. H ouse LENGTH - X WIDTH S.F. . S.F. S.F. _ S.F. . S.F. B. Garage _ X c . D riveway ^"3-----x--------!3=i Mil S.F. S.F. S.F. 0. Sidewalk S.F. S.F. E. Patio / D eck S.F. S.F. 9^50 F. Landscape areas underlain BY PLASTIC SHEETING 6. Other Total Hardcover in Zone Total P«o.€iitv fcie* in Zo*e ^TSO S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.a 46 ^ m _X100 • _% n -1* J 7 J - A 5 m it \ > .>• • V- • • 'll* . /■- . Sr, I?a» ^1 I Village of Orono Zoning Variance Application For O'.ficiai Use OniT Nane Case No.rr/ ^ ^ *'V 7.?^ Direocions to Applicant: e..Pill out tMs fom In duplicate by typing or printing in ink. If the spaeea provided are inauffloient, use additional sheets, keying Inforaation to the proper Item number. b. e. Attach all supplementary material by paper clip 1. Pile duplicate applications and filing foe (S with Zoning A^alnlstrator, (Laat;^ (Wrst) ) ■•A Ma « M >» (I A Nine of Owner:(Hiddl.) 2, Ad<iress of Owner: (No. and streec) ^\>ity vid Zone) (Phone) /DS-^ f&rl'ida le Roa/ li/d^sf_________________ 3. street Address o^ Properly Involved: : PqkOf l A Es/rri^ if. Xeg^ Description of Property Involved: ,rni^es this property border on or lie partially within an adjoining munlclpalltyT '■ In 6. Present use: VACA/(/r 7. Proposod Use: KeS/ y. Present Zoning District: SACK rfCCi'^l UAK^ Date Property Aeq\dred: !0. Variance la requested fran the following sections of the Zoning Ordinance: 3 / J i* / neeapB' M iVhat ara the requirenants of the orainanca sections liauou x.T Item 10? 5£T«aCi^ fftar^LA'tCE h ? I ^. i; seriSAOK ritoM Has «n appUcavUn lor jonlns variance ^ f?I*lSat ‘’alJC^ Ir^eS? S?.« thi ilfa of the Vlllaoe Council’, action. VO. ^owiSs i^r?5r?!S''^^'braat.bUahad^ bafora a varianca can ba granted. Explain in da ^ each atatanant xrtierein your case conforms to tha raqulran .ona sat fortn In tna 'y^^|^"p^^y^fffTTTT<S7r"Qr'^ard3nJLp to Qwner^. Strlc. ?VtA ni*'nviaiono of the Zoning ordinaneo would result in Daeuliar and practical diffloultlaa or axeaptlonal or undue SSSSiilJ !^n'?h. owB.r of the lot In developing or u.lns auch^t in a manner cuatcniary and legally pamlaaibla within the toning district in which said lot is located. SiiSun^ of ?ha^ariar.ca la necessary for the and an^yoant of a aubatantial property ‘ cant and to alleviate demonatreble hardship and wj?l not merely aervo aa a convenience to the applicant. Explain in detail. ^ rhe.I ^ /■( t' fricitfJce-'- (?e/oZ-t // V ';M... k. • '4.'' t >< . 1 • . > -... I?. Sxeaptlonal Conditions or the Lot; 'Dtere T» special condl« tions (narrownaaa, 3haiiown«sa or shape of a lot, exceptional topographic or »#ater conditlona or other extraordinary and exceptional conditions of such lot) applying to the structures or land in question that are peculiar to the property involved or Imediately adjoining property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Explain in detail. 16. Effect on Weiahhornood and C<»prehenaive riant drcuiting the variance will not iiq^air an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, unreasonably increase the oong»ati6n. in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, unreasonably dlniniah or impair sstablished property values in the surrounding area, or in any other way ijnpair health, safety, ccnfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and any applicable comprehensive plan. Explain in detail. • •»f*.. . -■-tyr \. V( ”ifi- -f •'' •ui UoWT" The folloMing material mu3? be attachsd to this application. 17, A map or plat showing the property affected and all lands within 150 feet of the boundaries of the property affected by proposed change. ( copies) 10. An abstractors certified property certificate listing the names and addresses of the owners of the land within 150 feet of the boundaries of the affecteo property as those names 4ipp9ar on the records of the County Auditor of Hennepin County. Acknowledgement and Signature: Pie undersigned hereby repre oenta"upon all of the penalties of law, for the purpose of inducing the Village of Orono to take the action heroin roquosted, that all statements herein are true and that all work herein mentioned will be done in accordance with the ordinances of the Vuingo of Orono and the laws of the State of Minnesota. 'MmAHL ate Signature J t A I fIi '4 it For bi'fluiai Comments Only: I TO: FROM: JlmCos&v, C!^v Administrator Uexter Marston, Zoning Adn: nistrator OATEO: SUBJECT; May I0» 1974 Variance - rVom the 75 ’ Setback Rec-Jirement PETITIONER: Maurice McCaffrey LOCATION: !053 Ferndalo Read West STAFF REPORT: Mr. McCaHrey >'rst 9°T^ g.rJV^ - i:.'S?r“AAr:,rsrctstr,c, » «• «tOo=A ro,M,reM,rt. , . ^ til nnH a letter from the Watershed District confirming the fact McCaffrey was grante’ a variance for the location of his home. «-«nee this time the City of Orooo has adopted Its o«n 75’ setback requlre- menr. a.;d Mr. McCaffrey was rw^t Informed of that until just recen y. ftomalty. a petitioner uho J !Je'^ou®cn w?IraS on tMs^^tter I!2?. ^^r?S%rnr;ro6l«. -Ith srartirs *M, vrrlan«. (n tf f-* t’* •F m *i ! w } 7 4 1) 7 It —4 Nr. N. HcCaffrey 147S Shoreline Drive Neysate* Ninnesotm 5S391 Re: Penit Application 74«2 Setback Variance - Femdale Estates - Orono Dear Mr. McCaffrey: This will advise you that the Minnehaha :r:.V . v ersl"! District Board of Managers, meeting Ja» '*:v i974, has approved the subject request for a variMce. The variance will allow a »0-foot setbac*. for «• -siidence to be built on parts of Lot 9 and Lot 10, Nc-x' -ore Cottage Acres on Brown's Bay of Lake Minnetor’« in the City of Orono. ;nnehaha creek watershed districtJUNNEHAHA CREEK WATERSi B.A. Hickok, P.E. Engineer for the District EAH/dv I k.^ •r t'V*- liL To:Mayor Peterson & Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson nc Proa: Date: Subject: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Adminis February 4, 1991 m Cfry u ian 'Nq #1611 Bruce & Camille Curtiss, 1920 Fagerness Point Rd After-the-fact Variance - Resolution Zoning District - LR-IC, Single family lakeshore residential, k acre, sewered Application - After-the-fact request for variance to replace deck in 0-75' setback zone. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Resolution Planning Commission Minutes 1/22/91 Planning Commission Action Notice 1/23/91 Memo & Exhibits of 1/16/'91 Discussion - Please review the memo and exhibits of January 16, 1991. Briefly, the applicants reconstructed an existing deck in the 0- 75* setback zone, without obcaining the proper variance and building permit. An anonymous complaint lead to investigation by the Building Inspectors who found that the deck was being totally replaced and was nearly completed. Review of the variance application and a search of documentation in City files indicates that the new deck is almost identical to the previously existing deck, and there is no increase in hardcover. The new deck is approximately the same shape as the old deck, and encroaches no nearer the lakeshore than the old deck. Plenning Casmdssioii RecoBiendation - At their January meeting. Planning Commission voted 5-1 to recosBRend approval of the after-the-fact variance fc*-' hardcover and lakeshore setback, finding no increase in hardcover, no changes in the pre-existing 0-75* setback encroachment, and the new deck increases the safety factor over the old deck which was de' '*riorating. iflanning Commission conditioned approval on the applicant p;j. .ng the penalty fee for the permit, and that the applicant mane any changes required by the Building Department in order that he new construction meet all building code requirements. The applicants have paid the after-the-fact zoning variance application fee. I- i;-.' -r A RBSOLDTION GRANTING APTER-THE-PACT VARIANCES TO MONICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 & 2 AND SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8 PILE #1611 WHEREAS, Bruce and Camille Curtiss (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 1920 Fagerness Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows; Exhibit A, attached (hereinafter "the property")? and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City after-the-fact variances to Municipal Zoninc Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 to permit the construction of an upper level deck constituting structure and hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone where no structure or hardcover is normally allowed. HOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1611. 2. The property is located in the LR-IC Single Family Lalceshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on January 22, 1991, and recommended approval of the proposed after-the-fact variances based upon the following findings: A) The newly constructed deck is in approximately the same configuration and same location as a previously existing deck which was removed immediately prior to this new construction, being located 25* from the shoreline. Based on documentation appearing in City files, it appears likely that the new deck has not increased hardcover on the property beyond that which previously existed, and the new deck is located no closer to the lakeshore than the previously existing deck. Page 1 of 5 a t ■5 iki B) All of the existing house and deck are in the 0-75’ zone. The applicants were granted a variance in 1981 for construction of an attached garage, such variance approval allowing 3,222 s.f. (15.1%) in the 0-75' zone. Per the hardcover calculations by applicants' surveyor, existing 0-75' hardcover currently is 3,233 s.f., within 11 s.f. of the amount previously approved for this property. C> Replacement of the old deck will result in a safer condition, since the old deck was deteriorating. D) The applicants proceeded to construct the replacement deck without applying for the necessary variance or building permit. 4, The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed after-the-fact variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the after-the-fact variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficult^'; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. OONCLDSIONS, ORDER AND COEDITIOM. Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants after-the-fact variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 to permit the after-the-fact construction of a deck located in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone where no structure or hardcover is normally allowed, subject to the following conditions: Page 2 of 5 1. Hardcover in the 0-75’ lakeshore setback zone is approved at a level of 15.1%. All existing and proposed hardcover approved with this variance approval is recorded in the calculation worksheet and diagram enclosed with this resolution as Exhibit B. The current property owners and all future owners of this property are placed on notice that hardcover shall not be increased above the currently approved level and any proposed improvements of this property that will result in additional hardcover must be approved by the City. Such approval may result in a requirement for concurrent# equivalent or greater removals of existng hardcover. 2. Applicants shall apply for and obtain an after-the-fact building permit# and shall pay the after-the-fact penalty fee. 3. Applicants shall make whatever changes are deemed necessary by the Building Inspector to bring this deck construction into compliance with Building Code requirements• 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicants# but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval# or this variance will expire on that date (February 11# 1992). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this varience shall constitute a violation of the zoning code# shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein# and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned applicants have read# under'*tood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves# their heirs# successors and assigns# hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of LiiC property. Page 3 of 5 k i' s' Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 11th day of February, 1991. ATTESTI Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OP MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 11th day of Pebruary, 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the Ci . Notary Public Page 4 of 5 L ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 22, 1991 ZONING FILE #1605-LINDSTROM CONTINUED V^rianc- Is is also rscomr.ended that tne applicant: be p!a=ef notT^e that no addxt.onai hardcover -I---; within the 0-75’ or 75-250' setback areas. .loos asked the banning Cornission needed to address the one foot discrepancy in •Che garage clearance. Kelley seated enat such an issue snou-d be left to the Building Inspector. Gafrron noted that uhe pooi, proposed, does not .tset the the 30’ setback iron tne ^ linL Kelley stated that the pool should be constructed to meet that setback. He asked what homeowners do with the water drainea from swimming pools. Gaffron stated that the City -oes not al.ow pool water to be drained into the sewer or septic systems, but we have no restrictions about draining the water onzo the yard. K^ley asked if the pool must be above the flood plain elevations. Gaffron statac. that he would have to research^that further. Motion, Ayes-3, Bellows and Hanson, Nay, abstained. Motion carried. #1611 BRUCE • CAMILLE CURTISS 1920 EAGERNESS POINT ROAD APTER-THE-FACT VARIANCES Mr. Jeff Mohr was present applicants. as a representative i. w -L the opened the Public Hearing at Staff to make a brief presentation. 7:23 o.m. and asked Gaffron summarized the information in nis .January 16, 1991 memo, noting that records seem to indicate that tne e.xisting dec is approximately the same size and di.mension as the pre-existing deck. Hanson questioned‘whether the footings have been determined to be adequate. Gaffron replied, "Th^e City Building Inspector would review that as part of the building permit process. There were no public comments and at /:25 p.m. Kelley w-osed the Public Hearing. thrill. ron,Vruction handled. Motion, Ayes-S Bellows Nay. Moti n carried. Bellows indicated that ^ incidences involving this property a.nd that the applicants actions were blatant and should not be rewarded. Cohen indicated that he reluctantly voted aye. - 12 - A r'-L I- i '! V M- > fe: ZONING PILE NO. 1611 Qp ORONO NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Crystal Bay» MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 1/2J/91 TO: Bruce & Camille Curtiss 1920 Fagerness Point Rd Wayzata« MN 55391 COPIBS TO: TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance MTB of MBBTING: 1/22/91 VOTE: 5 For 1 Against Planning ConMisaion recoasiends the following: ftpppoval subject to conditions noted below ■OTBS AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Approval of after-the-fact variance for deck replacement subject to: 1. Obtain after-the-fact building permit. 2. Building inspector directed to require any changes needed in order to meet Building Code. Applicants' next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council Monday, February 11, 1991; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Cosunlssion minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. dnik r Tos Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson FroBS Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:January 16, 1991 Subject: #1611 Bruce & Camille Curtiss, 1920 Pagerness Point Road - After-the-Fact Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IC, Single family lakeshore residential, 1/2 acre Application - After-the-fact request for variance to replace deck in 0-75* setback zone List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit J Exhibit E Exhibit P Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K Application Plat Map ’’roperty Owners List Survey Hardcover Calculations Planview Sketch of Deck, by Applicant Memo from Building Inspector 1/8/91 & 1990 Correspondence, Staff/Applicant/Applicant's Attorney Assessor's Records Original House Plans Documentation from Variance Application #643 Photographs Fartiasnt Facts - 1.In late summer 1990, applicants proceeded to totally replace the existing deck on the lakeside of the house, without obtaining permits. The City was notified of the work by an anonymous phone caller, and a stop work order was immediately posted. 2.The newly constructed deck is in approximately the same configuration and location as the previous deck. The most reliable documentation we have of the previous deck is in thn Assessor's records. Although for aesthetic purposes the deCiv < rrners have been angled, it is staff's opinion that the ner# deck has not increased hardcover on the property beyond that which previously existed. 3.A variance was granted in 1981 that allowed 3,222 s.f. (15.lt) hardcover in the 0-75' zone. As indicated on the survey, most of the property and all of the existing house and deck are in the 0-75' zone. Per the hardcover calculations by applicants' surveyor, existing 0-75' hardcover currently is 3233 s.f., within 11 s.f. of the amount previously approved for this property. ■frfiiiiHitefi n i:r.•; •* K: h 1^'- ^'' I- I-r II.,. - -r.', Zoning File #1611 January 16, 1991 Page 2 Discussion Please review the Building inspector's memo of January 0, 1991. The Building Inspector's observations and the accompanying photographs suggest that the applicant was attempting to avoid having to obtain a permit or City ^ipproval for the deck replacenent. The applicant has paid the after-the-fact variance fee, and, if the application is approved, would be required to obtain an after-the-fact building permit. Staff's site inspection on January 16, 1991 verified that the hardcover calculations by Gronberg appear to be correct, and the overall dimensions of the deck are nearly identical to the old deck dimensions on record. Staff Bei ifsndation Given that replacement of the pre-existing deck has resulted in no increase in hardcover on the property, after-the-fact approval might be justified by no increase in hardcover, no changes in the existing encroachment in the 0-75' zone, and creation of a safer deck. If necessary, there are a few very limited areas of rock and plastic in the 0-75' zone that could be reawved to result in a decrease in hardcover. A requirement that the applicant obtain an after-the-fact building permit would be appropriate if approval is recommended. Isv 5; A — OF J'l '% 'p lip 1/ cm OF oRoao - variarcb applzcatiom J .i Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Pee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) tr X 1 u'f W* I w».*V\' J.-•i"-A - v‘ ■ • VV-?C.- rA r- - ivV FROPIRTr LOCATK . 7- 7T Site Addreea / f s*;>A_> ^ '■ " , —* ‘•i 4 __ _/ . vi Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)3/ Attach legal description to application if not included on DEC required survey. 6 £990 APPLXCAMT Name ^ Phene (home) A Phone (work) Address: r/*<^c<iucss fj,^r City? <JjrZ .* 'A Zip: I «(if different than applicant Phone (home) % f. 1-t Name f *‘/^/rh i.cc Phone (wor)c} Address:^ - xt £:City:Zip: !?•■■■Date Property Acquired If^d^ (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land (month/year) OSS or pROPBsry Present Zoning District r> I Present Ose of Property H.jtt.»> Residential Other (specify) PTXos or HIST Estimated Construction Cost $ 7oo^~ Describe request in detail: KSt^A j^ Z/DA/yore^^^^cS: ay DgeX. • I Lot Area Setback Variances ( Lot Width Front Hardcover Side X Rear) Other EiiliMeMaiiiua.^ HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship enforcement of zcn r'JL. dship or practical diJ^XcuT^ resul^in^^rom 'SAic': ir.g regulations; ■ ^ . r*-j ^^ 1' 1 j ~ DESCRIPTION OP ONDSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:_^* • 2. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1.^ Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%"xll" for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 0*<"xll"). Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 0h"xll"). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this .application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above infoxaation has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature ^ /- Date W. / OWBHS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature /, t * . t Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled rswiew meetings of the Planning Cosmission and Council. If an applicant is enable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 4 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. msm '-r >v ^ •?* (»5 VC<' i^'AS M, -1 £? i irii^ jL O i X GOVT lot 3 RUN DATE Of/ES/M BATCH 009 PROP ADOR OHNCR NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 30 f7-ll7-23 23 0001 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO STATE LAND DEPT STATE LAND DEPT NOT FOR SALE/HATER FRONT * y HE»t4EPlN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OFt^ERS LIST 50 17-117-25 25 0005 00056 ADDRESS UT4ASSIGNED JAMES I HELEN KREMLR JAMES A HELEN KRAMER 1657 EAGERNESS PT RD NAYZATA MT4 55591 REPORT NO. PI455901 PAGE 25 38 17-117-25 25 D008 01905 EAGERNESS POIffT RO HILLIAM A HIDBS HILLIAM A HIBDS 1589 FINCH LA MOUND MN 55569 PROP ADOR ONICR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 30 17-117-23 23 0009 01913 EAGERNESS POINT DAVID L SLA^Xfk A NIFE DAVID L SLAVIK 1913 FACcRFttSS PT RO HAYZATA MN 55391 58 17-117-25 25 0010 01921 EAGERNESS POINT RO D L PETERSON A E H PETERSON DARRYL L PETERSON 1921 FAGERfiESS POINT RO S HAYZATA MN 55591 58 17-117-25 25 0011 01929 EAGERNESS POINT RD LLOYD DRAPER LLOYD H DRAPER 6015 GIRARD AVE SO MPLS m 55919 PROP ADOR OFiCR NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 30 17*117-23 23 0021 01099 EAGERNESS POINT RO LAM RARPINEN LAURl H KARPINEN 1099 EAGERNESS POINT RD S HAYZATA MN 55391 if PROP ADDR 36 17-117-23 23 OOiS 01932 EAGERNESS POINT RD 30 17-117-25 25 0016 01926 EAGERNESS POINT RD 58 17-117-23 23 0020 01837 FA6ERNESS POINT ONNiR NAME HARK R PLATT J A H KRAMER TAXPAYER HARK R PLATT EDO llOMGAOS COUP JAMES L KRAMER NAME/ADDR im FA6ERNESS POINT RO S7-^AUL-MN\ 55119 1837 FAGERNESS PT RO HAYZATA m B5391 HAYZATA MN 55391 TOTAL LABtLS BAICH DOV UUUH 38 17-117-23 23 0031 01920 EAGERNESS POINT RO BRUCE A CAMILLE CURTISS BRUTE A CAMILLE CURTISS 1920 EAGERNESS POINT RO HAYZATA MN 55591 TOTAL BATCH 009 00011 i I CERTIFV THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEFMEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PRO^RrY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MV KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF. DEPARTMENT OF PR^RrY TAXATION, T C ‘ jcsri; la i L-ffc, - ;. K U--fc:V-v^r I?.#:*'.'- • r' ■ h-h t:;"t ■i:^ m w & Rr- K-J' W- &■n- HARDCOVER CALCULATICN nCRRSHEET SETBACK ZC:;E: (circle CNE; , C-/^ /-“- Existing Hardcover in Zone A. ■ H ouse ‘ LENGTH >1/^ 7f ^IMKBr Z.l 3. G arage elOKii., c. D riveway ^ec/< dOUC. '^Tio D.. St&gWALK Co doyc. mg. ^*60 • t % E. Patio / DECK TAT. <» PH-IC. - 2.0 • 2d ~ 'I, 0 7.^ Out. . t: Ji^ 4V'r < F. Landscape 2.c AREAS UNDERLAIN ^ BY , ^ - PLASTIC J? SHEETING G. Other . X X _ X X X X X X X _ X _ X X X X - X _ X 2-.Z WIDTH 2:^-7; ■ O ^0.7 2 S 4.5 4 0 O /<r.5 -T S Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone //-/’- /o •'V m ^ ^ ^ 0 « w w //7<- /c r^ « :yssa^ r “^ «/Z , S • r • f /2 * » s.F. *4 _ •.« - f*w^ d - '-*W#o « S.F. V c ro • < 1 • •qyy .* C _• >/ 1 » • 270 ?? r . 1 • 3 00 S . r I 2 4^.Z s.F. 7.8 3 1 r t % G.o 'i.c^s.F.% l*>. o• «» . iia5 S.F. , V 7 :> • • \ \ • S 1 r • * % • ^ : • ■ A. s.F. 9 » S.F..*- : i. \ . ^ ' ^S • F • s.F. - r 7ZJ? Z / 7^0 s.F. S.F. Z133 4- fil 7.f,3SO_ X 100 - A i % p- 1'^ ^ ^ -Ti '^ /, • * ' ' /ii:. T-: »- •••• •« ' /' t* »• • • t i,aicri r^ f K I' I'f if i;-f f;, ■' L- I I bym. |C t N HARDCOVER CALCULATIC!!1 »/n* ♦'•'•T*H 0 T\ i*\ w n ^ i SETBACK ZC:!S: (CIRCLE C.‘IS)t *' 1 " / - r • , r—' V ^ W MB ^ L« Exist ING Harzccver in Zcne Hni!?";< ■•• LENGTH • ♦ y« % WIDTH #S • F • X S.F. •X s S.F, • X • S.F. 3.Garage X S.F. < C.Dr IVFWAY '’rO .O X I7.F,525 S . r ■ X • S • r • D, ! « R rnPWAi K ■X S • F * #X .S»f* • X X S.F. E.’atio/}eck • - . S.F. • e.lANnsriPP X S S.F. AREAS UNDERLAINav X S.F. RUSTIC SHEETING X » S.F. X . S.F. c. Other X S • FI Total Hardcover IN Zone S.F. Total Property Area in Zone /9So S.F <f/5 B / fSO X 100 ?/■ % :•• • • V /A/2 - 9 •r> •V 1 i O .Z^^ J.,y/,yi^ '■' # £ • < z r • , C ^ • • > 7/' JL I < ) ;■/(- ') I V 1 // f:/ ). ' ^/ H Vf ^ M ^ T'1 r r IS," 5,.fe-IW" - Sf-“' To: 1891.1 1920 Fagerness Point Road •* Bruce S Carri^^^ke Curtiss Pron:Lyle Oman» Building Official Date:January 8, 1991 Subject: 9/11/90 Deck Construction Without Perinit Received anonytnous phone stating a deck was being built at 1920 Fagerness Point Road and materials are stored, painted and cut in the garage. 9/11/90 Inspectors Lyle Oman and Bruce Vang visit the property. From the street it looked like an old existing deck, but when we walked to the back yard, it became clear that this was a new deck. The old guardrail was propped on top of the new deck and an old joist was clamped on below that for no apparent structural reason. An old post was also used. This end of the deck is all you can see from the street. This gave the strong impression that the owner was trying to hide the new construction (see photos). A Stop Work Order was posted stating no work until a permit was issued. 9/12/90 Visited site to take more photos, clamped on joist had been removed. Guardrail and 9/20/90 Letter to owner reauiring permit application by October 1, 1990. 9/27/90 The City received a letter from the owners' attorney requesting more time. 9/28/90 Letter to attorney granting o ‘lension until Planning Commission deadline of Octobei J*', 19® 11/27/90 Letter sent to owner stating application has not been received. New deadline of December 7, 1990. 11/28/90 The City receives letter from owners' attorney dated November 26, 1990 stating a surveyor had been out and they were awaiting the results. 12/6/90 Received application. . .,J i-! ' i I t'- I V 1920 Fagerness Point Road January 9» 1991 Page 2 of 2 ” Briics & Canrille Curtiss Previous History on LaJceshore Setbaclcs 9/14/01 Mr. Curtiss was granted hardcover, iakeshore and street setback variances to construct a garage. 10/24/84 Mr. Curtiss was ordered to remove fill he had recently placed within 75' of the lake and within 26 o. a designated wetland. 1/11/88 Mr. Curtiss was granted an after-the-fact variance for a fence within 75' of the lake and within 26 of the designated wetland. 4 ( % * % f "i i , *»J tm irr ILl ii»«' '• 4 1 isS-iS ■■.; iri IV f -ft' — iV <> J - - ." "* . •wi;: 5'V‘ «»V. I « 4 ♦ 1 INNOVATIVE MICROGRAPHICS DUE TO THE POOR CONDITION OF THE PRECEEDING DOCUMENT WE CANNOT PRODUCE AN ACCEPTABLE MICROFILM IMAGE - i ] > «*• r ^rr > n > -€ITY<r Post Office Bo* *5<>«Crystal Bay, Minnesota .to323* Municipal Office* i On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka December 6, 1990 Bruce and Camille Curtiss 1920 Fagerness Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 RE: Variance Application Dear Mr. and Mrs. Curtiss: by Wednesday# January 16, 1990. I£ you have any further questions, please contact the city offices at 473-7357. Sincerely C^-u> Linda Vee Secretary I i4flUMNCaiONINC-473-7M7 AMiUUHC administration a finance - •*73-7728 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7 J5P ■■ . P :y-I- CITYof ORONO Po*l Office Box 66*Cry««l Bay. Minnaota 55323eMonidnal Offl< > ;NO On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka !lov«Bib«r 27 r 1990 Bruce and Camille Curtiss 1920 Pagerness'Point' Road Wayzata# MN 55391 RE: Deck Construction Without Permit Dear Mr. Curtiss: On September 11, 1990 a stop work order was Posted on a deck application has not been received. £a«l free to contact anyone in the Building and Zoni g Department. Sincerely, Lyle Oman Senior Building Inspector Enclosure: Variance Application cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning * Zoning Administrator Bruce Vang, Field Inspector LO/lsv •inUNNCa ZONING - 473<73S7 AonnNG AOMWlSTkAnON a nWANCE - 473-735»PCIUC WORKS - 47V7M* r# ■f- G ordon G. (Jeff) Mohr attorney at law SOLTHGATE OFFICE PLAZA 5001 VtTST Ww STREET. SUPTE 102D BLOOMINGTON. MINNESOTA 5543" (612) §31-(J»«4 R 2 qw Q 1390 November 26, 1990 Mr. Lyle Oman Senior Building Inspector City of Orono Post Office Box 66 __ Crystal Bay, Minnesota Re: Bruce and Camille Curtiss 1920 Fagerness Point Road Dear Mr. Oman: AS an update --ddardUg the Curt,s^^riance^appu^^^ nUhing from the'surveyor Py 11-6-90. « nnd out When \heir work would Pe ready_^ and we were told »y 11-13-90 On 11-13-90 we were told that ihe week lire accira?e. We are still awaiting the survey it is expected any day. At that point the application will b- r.ady. Sincerely, Gordon 6. (Jeff) Mohr Attorney at Law 6GM:Jah h ■V . / P' r CITY of ORONO Post Offier Box 66*Crytui B*y. MiansMta SS323*Mttaidpai Ofiea On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka 8«ptaiBb«r 26 f 1990 Gordon G. (J«£f) Mohr Soothgnto Offlco Plaza '5001 Moat 80th St., suite 1020 BlooBilngton, MN 55437 REt Bruco and Camille Curtiss - 1920 Fagerness Point Road D^ck Construction without Permit Dear Mr Mohr: T «m In raceiot of your letter of Septertber 26, 1990. The City is willing to extend the deadline T99o""^This is ShS dHdlino for the November 19, 1990 Planni.ng Commission mooting. Because of the severity of this violation previous history on this property, the City will not hesitate issue citations and proceed with a formal complaint if thi deadline is not met. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at my office. Sincerely, ^^CQa***— TLyXe *0sMa Senior Building Inspector cci Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building 4 ZoningMiohael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning 4 Zoning Administrator Bruce Vang, Field Inspector .,4Bruce i (isdlle Curtiss, 1920 Fagerness Point Rd., Mayzata, MM, 55391 BMUS«GaS0fNM:-4l3.73l7 auomnc AOMlNOniATION A nNANCC-<73.7Si FAX-473491# PUBLIC WOSKS - 473>7m# t: *■ ' I - v'' I? Ji ■ i.. r iy. Gordon G. (Jeff) Mohr attorney at law SOUTHGATE OFFICE PLA2A JOOI WSST BUi STREET. SUITE 1020 BLOOMINGTON. MINNESOTA SMJ’ (612) r o- r.RGNO QUE lID'^ SEP 2 7 t9SD September 26, 1990 Mr. Lyle Oman Senior Building Inspector City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Bruce and Camille Curtiss 1920 ragerness Point Road Dear Mr. Oman: Please be advised that I have been asked to advise I have undertaken a review of this matter incUoing a ° j.. Orono City Code. Tm sure you can appreciate require some time. I have today directed Mr. Cur.iiS .o co...Ki--e the variance application together with whatever information or forms are required. I doubt that I have given Mr. Curtiss sufficient time to clo a proper job on the variance, so please do not hold if he doesn't have it in by October 1st, he 11 have it in as soon as possible. We appreciate your understanding Sincerely, Gordon G. (Jeff) Mohr Attorney at Law GGM:Jah cc: Bruce and Camille Curtiss 'i .1: K' ft' "'I' i K‘ L- Jv 't % % V i • CITYof ORONO Pott Office Box 66*CryttaJ Bay. Minncaota 55323•MiinidoaJ Officao OfK:)N(}'2 On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka September 24^ 1990 J«ff Mohr 5001 Host 80th Suit* 1020 Bloomington, MN 55437 Re: Deck built without permit at 1920 Fagerness Point Road Dear Mr. Mohr: Enclosed is a better written to Mr. Curtiss in 1984 quoting the Orono ordinance which restricts construction within 75' of the lake. Also enclosed is a copy of the Stop Work Order from 1986 which resulted in a Council resolution requiring fence to be shortened to 3>s'. Bruce Vang# Field Inspector BV/tln Enclosurescct Jeanne A. Mabusth# Building & Zoning Administrator Lyle Oman# Senior Building Inspector SUttJDINC a ZONING-47>7}r -u; AOMlNISnunON a HNA.NCE - 473.T35« FAX-47M9M PfBUC WOSKS •4n>T]99 r' b j fit r r ^ - y.. I i- L-.v [•-* r". •, • ^ ¥ 1. ‘ K !"■: F M 1 CITYof ORONO ! I V )( )hUlNQ Po9i Office Box 66»Cry»t«l Bay. Minneaota 55323•Munidpal Offli On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka Seotember 20r 1990 Bruce Curtiss 1920 Pagerness Point Road wayzata, MN 55391 , Re: Deck Construction without Permit Dear Mr. Curtiss: U. — 11 1 Qon a Work Order was issued on a deckOn September 11, 1990 a stop wor^ Paoerness Point hardcover code requirements T, this d.adline is not mat. the City will issue citations and rVf.% the to the City Attorney for further le,al action. Sincerely, s> Lvle Oman, Senior Building Inspector LO/tln ,. ^. Enclosure - Variance Application »,ims’Ti4«t-r*tor SSS:i^."SS??rS;,®A«tilanning" Zonin, Administrator Bruce Vang, Building Inspector Bryan Crawford, City Attorney ■UIUNNG A ZONING - 47V7357 ASSOSINC aOMlNISniATlO'* A n\ANCI - 4T3.T35I FAX-anasw PUBLIC WORKS - 47>T3S* .. *. • .# • •: ..: ?.•■.• %• * 1 ’.r^**‘** , ,V*‘* *. * * • -I f- • ■ • « « •. * —,*4; > > •» r.- ' '••■ '■ • ■ ■■'-■ •” w - • - • •• • * •# • • - 4* . - "’•.*• w. • "r ■^ r"* ^ OATF •ME cmroFORONO INSPECTION NOTICE P0IMITNO.______ called in SCHEDULED COMPLETED A00RE8S OWINEfl. / ^ PoffuT CONTRa 5 I ts li1101 rooriNQ 11 MECHANICAL Rl 16 WELL TEST PU^'O 02 FRAMING 11 MECHANICAL final 18 EXCAV/GRAD^SG - -L >4G 08 INSULATION 34GS W0O06URNER/FIREFLACE 19 lakesmore %vf ^nos 04 WALL BO.12 WATER HOOK-UP 3A TREE REMOVAw 00 final 13 METER SprrruRN ON 17 SITE INSPECT OS OfOmO^SITE 14 SEWER HOOK UP 06 PROGRESS 07 0040-final 27 SEPTIC MAINT 21 complaint OIFIUMOHQRI 15 SEPTIC install 22 POLLOW U? 10 FUIMBINO FINAL 23 SEPTIC final OWNHUeONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU: YES NO COMVCNT& 4fe.$tto?oaoe/i- -PosTTcrP PaAAra«w\9jbu oiOj CIO 4"C3^ O^UJC Cc^sr^ Aj^ CAae^vc o/N>Tt<^S. I I i I4 awoMtSAnwACTommocsED * aOOMMCTWOmiAMOCECO 4 :CTK>N O OOMMCT UNtAPE OONOmON VWTHIN __ HOURS. r PROJECT COMPLETE r ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY ______temporary ______permanent ONOEH ROmO. CAU. WERECTOII ^ RWRECnOW REOWNEO. CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS r PHOTO taken I otation issued Call ter ttw iwil tetpactlon 24 hours in advanco. 473*7357 wswcteronaltee CMry Coty/Sila Nottoi f t I, r vT. •. •• j‘iF---*.’'?—r^L ' •* ’■ ■' " . . * * *r " *^ ^ ^ ^ *** ■ “ * .' ** * ^ - . ‘C^.- /• * ■. :•■ ■' •: -'sVV-ri-c^.V.. - • . •« : .. * i;.*—-- V .F Rw- •• V • » • ••••• »V. •’-•R *L •!•«*- »• «•A • • - . 'i- * . • • . .w%- ^ • » • * " .r - ..: •» • >• •••• -••“i*- ' .• •. *» . -‘S^ * -A -r v^ - - • • '.. ; i ^ V. Ut^ ••• • •**>- - ----------- . ^ ..■* '.A.v. - , .. •. • .... ***X '.> . r. 1* ..ra.* ‘L• w ^ • *•^ ^ • I V* . ■•.T-,V'-A5fi ^ • r< ’ *. * ^ cAMfA — ■ nAT ^ - AAMCf k ^ — ate ___^ ^ AMO&s TYfC 1 1% 1)% t 1% 7 i/t S/t 7 CLAtt t } 12 t ■ 7 ACi- IMtAtCTIOM OATI ^ APMAltAk OATI SAkI OATt partial TYtf - »» J- 7 ^ iDifMOvrMCMrs A^ VAkU< - ___SA<2Jb£ V 7 Um^ M IXTHAA ffrl6f*rfHfc 1<?<• ? %f ■fMT. tlMHN • ? nUMtlMO • 7 tCUMIWO • 7 tumtiMO • 7 tiniKACI • 7 tmittACi • 7 tWOMMT.§7 •UlLTIMt • 7 VAULTtOCfkL.lasAttt TRIM CfMTRAk AIR 7 RATIO DOOM 7 ttNCCS ? ? ? -fO%J « • •'71 / \ i»»U* IrO » I kJ'/'/' ( /, - m j ^ * -V T* - -. f * ^ 7 -* -• *\r“ ' i ^€'* X. ^ • » -^* " *^* 4 35" *4nt :«» .M «sa '?Ji 3 •aK! * r i»Jf1^ l VI 4^1^ .4M|i4b^ .r% 444^^^^ m\ _»^t^f «>- -*A^ ^ VW3/y^^ |i|r^*’^_i' mi^n^rlr^m^i J liiw ,'^'>^'-*y^ /y^\‘' y^JS- ** ~*'*^^****^^^*^**^*^*??t^'^3?^ pf>^ r^ 11V r /1' t. f ‘i tf W]&*a» •>r*^ • i* •^••- •-•';«» "i^^;!tr wv^ •. i '' » ' I ##. I ^ ^ J ^•itA Mr ><^^i*’^.''fri4»»* ^ifai#<»>jrr.-c^i»ixJg-.i* K*0»»J bfi^i*iGYj:Wis:w•s?® .<4«£A r.:n:r:c±rrsr:f-:^fcS^aa3 ;ii jvpKksA^^^ • • r i’i' ^7^?® ■ ■ ^. I *', -v -. • ^t. •• ..\ ^ v?tv,\ar< *TT<c»Ti?i7.ViJj 7¥tInUaifKAr>(H;’.4 v- i *< 7 ■m i> »^*W*A' / .rf- «»‘. *rr».* • • • »•*• f.V HI wlB^-'X^wcr J ™,jf?ViP*i‘ '"*■ ' '-■'■.tf-’' ■ ^>'j A ’-^ «. '-I • ' D.. v| )?;•■' 7'i 'I'^ >• - ' 'stAMiA -7> if h \ '• ‘ \ ' '■y- '■• r-'^>K' 'iy ■ ^ A'l * .• vr a ^ 0“;•» fIiLij-T' V. • .L>jj f 1 ’:- • a ■ -J ‘A-i *;; i ? ’* f'i------ !,«e3Ss rvw u#l TTI* »«• «MKIwr 3 «»»vtntrv'«»ii •o *# ►.« r» ^ iVff i .• Xf 'j I'i lii uv a iKi.iN'i piliiipa^ii9E.Piiptf * . '' 1 ■ : '3 ■ ■ ^'ojfej' y. i*» .i>^^ -X #- < I '. 9 t ’• • « . • m- I ^*•: 4 4 I MVMur f fikHTtik ^ •* t ' 4 % • • « • i * • 2 i I i i! ^ rc f • • •: * i .■•-m rnsmmmmiliM Vf ir ' ‘ '" ■"Is______ tJ ^ f ^ . > i: • % ^ V * \ .• . I* ’ ♦'. ... ‘ •A-'* 'i'rir J Jkf4,.r a.-gyc ."»i *•* - ' utkT C%4lT^ :aT5*■ •*■; •* • ■* 'f ' •yr~ ^ iA ■>V^ l§*% ^ » » • V k **9 , *f v> «• I .•V/ ' e ». • # \ « > im ll _ i^ '“3 rT-- r--*-.'' fln \ •.*•.;Trv***>*-'••• ^^v5» INNOVATIVE MICROGRAPHICS DUE TO THE POOR CONDITION OF THE PRECEEDING DOCUMENT WE CANNOT PRODUCE AN ACCEPTABLE MICROFILM IMAGE. 1 I J TTrTofrnyma —iH'Mtrol N'o.».4 J •»•<>! M.i* M Hu. .. MTO: 11^ * Bruco 4 C.imiHc Curtiss 1920 FagernesB Point Road Wayzaca* HN 55391 Mfccing Date 9-I4-81 Notice Date 9-15-81 Variance __ Conditional Uaa Peralc _ Subdivision. Prell«lnarr Subdivision, Final Copies Co: »a*< SB* ****»***’»<>*res s Bsaees BBBB** a »a*a*Br»iH>*iir»»*eiVi»^>»>**^****^***** ****** COUNCIL ACTION Vote: .JL ___ Against ---- Abstention NOTIOX *® approve the hardcover# lakcshnro setback.and 10* atrecr ■•ebagk XbA—tadJamt ^variances for your proposed 34* x 36’ aetaghed saraft findinpat 1) reduction of approximately 1700 sf of hardcover; 2) proposed improvonents located further from lakcs.*^ore> 3) t.*:e carace located with door; facing out to street will allow the complete removal of existing gravel areay 4) Fagerness Point Road is a dead end road receiving limited use. Approval is subject to the followin<jr conditions;AmA hhm p*»^p^r»y — 2} application to wort with staff in regard to complete removal of gravel area. and the restoration of that area by seeding or sodd 4 » 4 /tfi - 1 has asked staff to work with vou eQ»f»»rfitna m mnue as date nf the >ase a a s aas s s assaaa *es eeasatsssssBssssss Bs s s*ee s sB a *eass*ssszAzss DEADLINE DiTE Septewber 14, 1982 aaasssaaaeoea for subnittal of new infonaacion (application may be considered formally withdrawn if infomsclon or explanation is not provided!. ___ for Work Permit ___ for work to begin ___ for work to be application completed WORK PERMITS ARE REQUIRED - contact Building Inspector before beginning ^Moirlc eVARIANCE APPROVAL is limited to the extent shown on approved plana. Dm net ehange plans, variance authority expires one yoo<’ af^o^ approval* OONDinONAL USE APPROVAL expires upon ehange of ownership or use, or on deadline date specified above. PRELXMXMRT SUROIVISION APPROVAL - Applicant must provide all information and/or improvements reguired for final approval. (Sontact zoning Administrator. ^ HNAL SIADIVISION APPROVAL • Applicant must have and all other regutred deexsnencs recorded, with certification or recording returned to the City by deadline date. i A TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Walter R. Benson Jeanne A. Mabusth September 9/ 1981 #643 Bruce Curtiss, 1920 Fagerness Point Road Variance Zoning District - LR-IC Wlication^- vLiances for new garage + new and removal of existing garage and paved area proposed * 25* variance * 75' c) Front (street) setback required = 30' existing » 19’ proposed ■ 20' variance = 10' or 33.3% Planning Commission Action -to approve the hardcover + setback variance but to deny street setback variance - turnaround had to be provided on property. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Application Property Owner's List Survey Plat Map Hardcover Plans Building Elevations Curtiss' Letter r To:Mayor Peterson 6 Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Fron: Date: Subject: V. Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Adm.inistr. January 10, 1991 %0#1612 C. Dale/G. Paulson and J. Sawchuk - 4085 Watertown Road and 4105 Watertown Road - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance- Section 11.05 - Definition 24 - Lot area minimum. Each lot shall contain the minimum area required for each proposed lot as prescribed in the zoning chapter of the City Code. In rural zones not served by sanitary sewer, each lot must contain a minimum of 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land exclusive of wetlands, public and private rights-of-way, vehicular or pedestrian easements, . . . The proposed subdivision requires approval of the creation of an access easement over portions of an existing driveway that serves one of the properties involved in the lot line rearrangement. The owner of the property granting the easement should be advised that this area cannot be included as dry buildable area in a future subdivision. The properties are located in a 5 acre minimum lot zone and the property from which the easement is to be granted does not contain 10 acres in area. This would only be relevant to the owner if zoning densities were increased and the zoning district remained rural (not served by sewer). Section 11.05 - Definition 66 - Class I subdivision required for lot line rearrangement and creation of private easement. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I - Exhibit J - Application Property Owners List Plat Map Applicant's Attorney's Addendum Survey of Lot Line Rearrangement 1976 Deed Survey, 4105 Watertown Road Comprehensive Survey/Site Plan of Both Properties Septic Inventory Map, 4105 Watertown Road 4105 Watertown Roac A. Lot Area: Required - Existing <■ Proposed » •Proposed » 5 Acres Approximately 188,000 s.f. or _ acres wetlands) Approximately 386,650 s.f. (reduction by of lands to be deeded at 1,350 s.f.) Approximately 383,975 s.f. (area exclusive of access easement) 9+ acres (.2 area Zoning File #1612 January 10, 1991 Page 2 ft \V' Lot Width: Required = 300' Existing = 192.67' Proposed = 182.67' Existing Variance = Proposed Variance = 107.33' or 35% 117.33' or 39% * Easement area is excluded from dry buildable for rural zoned property. 4085 Watertown Road A.Lot Area: Required Existing Proposed 5 acres Approximately 28,000 s.f. or .64 acres 29,350 s.f. (additional 1,350 s.f. of deeded area) B. Lot Width: Required Existing Proposed 300' 70' 80' Rttview of Application > Please review applicant's attorney's addendum. Exhibit D. In 1976 the original owners of 4105 attempted to deed the :;orridor along the east side of the property that was to be taken over an existing drive that served the residence at 4085 Watertown Road. The property owners were not aware that subdivision approval was required of the City. The deed was accepted by the County for filing, monies were exchanged, but the official plat maps of the County never reflected the subdivision because the City denied the division. The former property owners failed to apply for subdivision in 1981, the year the deed was filed. The property at 4085 is currently in the process of being old to Dale and Paulson. A recent survey of the property levealed that the majority of the drive still remained within 4105 Watertown Road (Exhibit E). The owner of 4105 and the new owners of 4085 have filed the subdivision application seeking approval of the lot line rearrangement of the land corridor originally deeded in 1976 and of a new private easement. lasuee for Consideration Lot line rearrangement - If the lot line rearrangement is to be approved, a lot width variance would be required as set forth above. The property has less than 10 acres in area and could not be subdivided based on the current standards. The property at 4065 only can benefit by the lot line rearrangement. No setback variances would be required for the structures on 4105 as the principal structure is located at the west side of the parcel. Zoning File #1612 January 10, 1991 Page 3 Refer to Exhibit H. There is no impact on the existing drainfield area within 4105 (Exhibit I). Unfortunately, the additional area to be acquired by 4085 would not be suitable for on-site septic expansion as the entire area is predominantly used for the access drive. Creation of Private Baseaient As already noted, the area of the easement would be excluded from the dry buildable area if the property remains rural. The granting of the easement area will have no impact on the property at 4105. Note that there is no impact on required setbacks from the west line of the easemnt corridor. If the subdivision of a lot line rearrangement is to be approved, a width variance must be granted. Planning Commission may consider some of the findings already noted by staff above. Zoning File #1612 February 1, 1991 Page 4 Additional CoBMents and Planning Commission Recommendation -ajHtti The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the proposed subdivision involving a lot line rearrangement and creation of a private access ease'"''”'*^ the approval of the lot line rearrangement, the Pla" '’’on also recommended approval of the lot wiou'* ' ''uce lot width of the most western parcel (4105 Vyarerrown Roa^-.. '>m 192.67’ to 182.67’ and increased the most eastern lot (4085 rtown Road) from 70* to 80’. The Planning Commission accepted u..e findings noted in the staff memo on Page 2 concerning the need for the granting of a lot width variance. Those findings have been incorporated in the staff resolution. The resolution has been drafted per the recommendation and findings of the Planning Commission. A RESOLOTION APPROVING A METES AMD BOUNDS SUBDIVISION OP A LOT LINE RBARRANGBIENT AND CREATION OP A PRIVATE BASEMENT FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 4085 « 4105 NATERTOHN ROAD PILE NO. 1612 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter "City Council") has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision of a lot line- rearrangement and creation of a private access easement by Joseph Sawchuk, Christopher P. Dale and Geri Lee Paulson (hereinafter "the subdividers") of properties legally described on the survey attached to this resolution (as Tracts A and B), (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, Council has granted a lot width variance to Tract A based on the following findings; 1. The subdivision does not involve the creation of new building sites, but merely the readjustment of the shared lot line between Tracts A and B. 2. All existing structures and improvements on Tract A meet the required setback from the newly defined setback line. 3. Tract B is severely substandard in area and lot width based on RR-IA standards, and the proposed division will increase the area and lot width of Tract B. WHEREAS, the subdividers have completed all requirements of the City for metes and bounds subdivision of a lot line rearrangement for division and combination purposes. Pa<,e 1 of 3 mim HOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the metes and bounds division of a lot line rearrangement, the creation of a private access easement and a lot width variance for Joseph Sawchuk, Christopher F, Dale and Geri Lee Paulson as shown on the Certificate of Survey by Phillip A. Nelson of All-Metro Land Surveyors dated January 7, 1991, revised January 25, 1991 and attached to this resolution, subject to the following conditions: 1, Upon approval of this subdivision by the City Council of Orono, Christopher F. Dale and Geri Lee Paulson must apply to the City for legal combination for tax purposes the following properties, as described in the above referenced survey of the metes and bounds division of a lot line rearrangement: Tract B to be combined with Tract C 2. The aforesaid division as shown on the attached Certificate of Survey shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Hennepin County Recorder's office or Registrar of Titles office on or before August 11, 1991 together with a certified original copy of this resolution. The subdividers are hereby advised that in order to fulfill the intent of this subdivision, that additional documentation must be created to provide for the legal transfer of fee title and granting of easement. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the division has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota, this 11th day of February, 1991. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, Ci«-- Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Page 2 of 3 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 11th day of February, 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Rallin# Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public jj -l CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION ^JL | 1 fr * PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address □N ^ ^ a.* Property Identification Number (P Please check one - Property ^ abstract or .I.D.) 3/ ns 2 3// ■: torrens? - L I. ^ w V\*\' • » - :cTAttach legal description to application. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _» — _ _ _ _ _—_ _— — — ^ mm I fc,i ■ Phone (home) “2-0^0 _ _ _ _ Phone (work) Citv: APPLICANT Name Address ':Jcick lli^nefJ J.W- vu*. * zip: ONNER (if different than applicant) p<t/€ Phone (home) y ~7^ ~ Vo Name 'L «t V/f^Ctrt Phone (work)_________________ s ^O^S' Zip:Address ________________________ (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Acres Dry T.and Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check)Residential; no. of units Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ Present Zoning District PROPOSAL __________ Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites:Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Units per Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use: (check)Residential Other (specify) NmillOM MATBRIAL NECSSSARY FOR COMPLETE Pf^IMIHARY APPLICATION . >V1. Completed Application Form , t 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificat^of Survey. 3. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 4. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). 2* Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5* Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ •/ S)cetch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) $150.00 250.00 250.00 Preliminary Review (Class T"I and all non-residential) 300.00 + 20.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) •(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 150.00* The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay al^L additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Oimer's Signature Date Date /(-2J ~90 Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please ma)ce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building s Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. MM OAH ll/tl/n MTCH 002 PROP AOOR (MCR NA»'^ TAXPAYCR HAMi/AOOR 50 si>ue-23 lA ooor OAIOO HATERTCPM RO PRATM KOKESN ET Al rOAMt KOKESH ^»100 MATERTOItl RO MAPLE PLAIN m 55350 HE^MEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SVSTEH PROPERTY C»tCRS LIST 50 31-110-25 41 0001 04040 NATERTONN RO DANIEL F KOKESH OAVIEL F KOKESH 4040 HATERTOIM RO MAPLE «»:.A1N 55’ REPORT NO. P141S401 PAGE t 50 51-110-25 41 0002 04025 HATERTOFM RO J S t P 0 RICE JEROME STANLEY RICE 4025 HATERTOtOI RO HAPL'i PLAIN MN 55559 PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR 50 51-110-25 41 0005 04045 NATERTOIM RO EARL N OORN ETAL EARL N OORN 4045 NATERTOIM RO MAPLE PLAIN HN 55559 50 51-116-25 41 0004 04105 HATERTUNN RO 0 6IGUERE t A GIGUERE JOE A PAM SAHCHUK 4105 NATERTOIM RO MAPLE PLAIN IM 555S9 50 51-110-25 41 0005 04095 NATERTONN RO C T DALE A 0 L PAULSON CMtISTOPHER F DALE ' L PAULSON X 'RTOIfl RO PLAIN IM 55559 PROP AOOR ONCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR SO 51-110-23 41 0008 04125 NATERTOIM RO M R A N E PLANK MICHAEL R A MARY E PLAML 4145 NATERTONN RO MAPLE PLAIN m 55559 #16-i1 50 31-110-25 41 0011 04115 NATERTOIM RO MICHAEL R A MARY E PLAIT MICHAEL R A MARY E PLAML 4145 NATERTONN RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55559 TOTAL BATCH 002 00000 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECOROS OF THE HEIMEPIN COLNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEOGE AND BELIEF. DATE i 0 t » % 1 tr X *;« .1 Oftivie liKated at ?24^< Mam street East JACK VIGOREN ATTORNEY AT LM\' PosI Otik'e Box 43? Mjple Plain M\ oi: 4“o.20»0 Osc December 5, 199H Jeanne A. Mabusth Building and Zoning Adrunistrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Application for Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement No new building sites 4085 Watertown Road Dear Ms. Mabusth: Enclosed herewith please find the following: 1.An application for lot line rearrangement signed by the present owner and myself as applicant; 2.A survey including all owners within 350 feet with a certification by Hennepin County Legal Description dept, and mailing labels for said owners; 3.A survey of the smaller piece showing in red the property deeded in 1976, and showing in yellow the new easement to include existing driveway; 4.Copies of deeds a) from Bloom to Kostka in 1976, b) from Sawchuk (contract v'endees of encumbered parcel) to new owners in 1990, including in fee for red parcel and easement for yellow parcel, and c) from Giguere (contract v’endors of of encumbered parcel) to new owners in 1990, including in fee for red parcel and easement for yellow parcel. 5.A check for $250.00. In 1976 the deed from the Blooms to the Kostkas was given in an attempt to convey the property over which the driveway was situated. Said deed was accepted by the county recorder when is was filed in 1981 even though not approved by the city. When the property was recently surveyed it was discovered that the driveway extended beyond what was deeded in 1976 and covered what is marked in yellow an the attached survey. ]J page 2 The purpose of the enclosed rearrangenent is to red and the easenent ?nciui»*:ru X J.--j V- ♦ - - rearrangenent is to approve the .ieed for the property narKeo in for ur<jM»irrty n\«3irK<?d in I would like to have this applicati<^n heard at the ver\ next available planning coninission neeting. away if there is anything further you would like ne to provide. Very truly yours. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY CI!1CA(;0 TITI.M INSIII^AHCK COMPANY' Pr«por0d tor!__________EARLIN KO.STKA (•'•'■h.l Ox I 't *io%< i%A*i<vivwt- U4 IVm(. ut t.* .f/ (Kt (C/4 t r s Ser* atl;ach*?<J slicet . foi logal description Paqe I of 7. GENERAL NOTES Dtnot«« Iron monument Cenotee eroee chittled In concrele Otnoitt iKlttln^i epot elevotlon Otnoitt propoetd «pot elevollon DtnolPt tortocc drolnoge IMtlifd eonloiif NnH d^notoe propoied feotures Stild eoliloilt M am dtAolte OKisflng features Proposed top of foundation elevotlon Proposed bosemenl floor elevotlon Proposed garage floor elevotlon = BENCMMAnK: TRO LAND SURVEYORS 2340 PoAlett Street I ctrtlfy thot tMi fufvtf, etail Of rtforf Mrwot prfpOftd by mt or uodtr my dlrfct fo^rtdfiofi ond thol t om o duly Pl0|i«ttrtd Lood Sorviyor undff ffii loot o( fht Stoft of Minnotofo. SCALf I “ - 50 ’ eooK MAC I h^weett..mm: ;♦ • « I •«•*•«••• ••4..............*..................... I- W4-. i •/!t^ ..... .... . andSUU* ef........, fi^.«BOl« . ,^1.. «f-ihs firtt J«nd jaiMbftlh XoetJca^ Imsband and * . ........ ............................ ..... . ' , vf County cf . partUt of <U tecond pari. l^nnaaoU t I H * r I •^ — .4- U :r:.iieDDRpin and StcU of Hipqaapia ~ I* : ^ da S J"^*lSV***‘^*'i“* f»riUa cf th* ftrH part. In oonrid^tU,n of lha rum of- vi,S* vrrrisiuias 7 I <’/ Pa»^» rtoelpi u,h4ru,f Is haro£. aH^7. " lifmt L 4 ~ Orant, Bargain, QultoUilni,'and Coni>ry unia tfuroaid parlUo of ihamAnd vnrPnt * llflnaepln.....................andSiaU of Mtnnogola, ducrlltdat foUcwi, lo-wUt I n: That part of tha ^ihaaai (^artor of Section }1, Townehlp 110, JUnia 23, dMcrlbad u Coiroanclnf at a potot in the centerline of the Sontb Watertown B^, aald bei^ the northeast comer of the West 10 acres of that part of the East Ha^ of the Scratheiet Quart«r of S ooMapi a_a^a. i: t tiS!rJoJtiLf^*Mj^*?‘* bejlimln* of the land being harelSSrerlbedr iSfc,. 4*^?”®* ^ . feetl thenca Eaet to a point on a line drawn Sooth of the^lnt of coordlng to the 0. S. CJoTemnenfeairvey thereof. • ” n5Vi isB!i7riy.#.«ty=ii5=i.i= “*i snifims {i 8tsU Deed tax due hereon '%atM*;£W'| d % j :( ^ ^yiti s \ f-rxV Ij- «<-<?» i« . • r ^s **^4i ^ka.e< •■>.. i 192.67 9|Si A*i e * $ -r : r 7 £V )f rporf «r * 5;^f r f -7f •N 09*32' 17" E 72 51 f I ---K- .r.o Sf I i •-• 3 »- - ^« C 1 “ ^ « ^ ^ - ! X : .1 oS --^’w V t i> c — sr ^ c - 5 f .:*• - j e • si?:;rw v/> ^ at »s. M / «/M At f f , / \n Ro(A ;«» >f .-'rr'r'.v', •.' •♦.. r . .. fa-i ’ -.* .h, SfrtTAA M f (f r pr ’'•••'•^ -.f that B*rt oV Vh* r«r«*’■*''’ ■:mrer Sf ,,.41 J,, S(.r»L r. ^V* O"*-***’^ If —-f. "• -obf-.w ‘"“f So.ith ba> • •*.. .... :c '" •»"* '5' "• ..n.K.» r,,:' <'"* '•'"> ^lll n<» '.r* ,. , „V / ’ '"• PU«o.. ■' trafj ,hJ ' *•'''’0 •»’H r.Bhf b»9in«.n4. '•'‘•'Te «tnr*h Wire, ■’• ■teb" rt'-n. ..' ®* *"V lotW1 H'.O! ■' ••■l>i*ri t- .•»,..., I 'I- -»urjnc. .,, „. 2 ’ ^ h I ^ ^ I » , » y ♦ ' <» t Mi: ro» f fn Shew r ifif- rV:;r,.-r:’:r^ ^ -- n-M ,br.. ■••' p IH.. ,p S«)l«.,6^ . „„ 5U.W lAHO S*VVrviH6, jik^^ ‘ -X H. -uSJi. l.l.C r i ««/« ' »A# : *t i 1 .11. * • . * *' •• •’ * * * • • * ‘ . * * *j* • ■ * • * * ‘ - * ^ j ** . mm 9 ^ ^ . :r• T • 1 •. i •. V-. •• ;• • * **'**.• *. • -1 5* INSPECTION HECOBD PUMPOUT RECOWD LOCATION SKETCH ; V' / • -N * J. V- - •*•- . • •-. • .•. • ^ - •. * •41 • • *i •* ^ 4*>. ..••I'.'-- '. r/•• - *•:> W V.- v;* :-.4 «• • ,*>«•• 5».4v. •-•p<4 %• • • •• V • * r • •• ' ' 4 * , . • • • . . • ( ’►v* • ^ :•*• •• • mmm • ; I r i- To:Mayor Peterson & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Proa: Date: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator^^^ January 14, 1991 Subject: #1613 Jensen Homes, Inc., 315 Tonkawa Road - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance- Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 - Conditional use required for non-rental apartment (refer to R-IA, Section 10.20, G2 - Non­ rental guest apartments). List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Application Property Owners List Plat Map Applicant's Addendum Lower Level Floor Plan First Floor Plan Second Floor Plan Sewage Treatment "Spec Sheet Reyiew of Current Application - The applicants propose the installation of a non-rental apartment within the lower level of the Bennett residence. As Mr* Bennett advises, the apartment is proposed for the exclusive use of domestic help to assist in the care of his children. Please review Exhibit D. A single access to the apartment is shown and functions as the primary and only entrance. The existing residence was constructed at a four bedroom use level. Review Exhibits E, F and G. The applicants propose two additional bedrooms on the second floor over the garage and with the additional bedroom in the lower level for the non-rental guest apartment, the house will contain a total of seven bedrooms. The original mound system design for this structure was at a six bedroom use level (Exhibit H). The applicants builder, Jensen Homes, has been advised of the septic deficiency. Staff met with Jim Jensen to discuss the potential for expansion of the existing 6 bedroom mound. Ii concept, the expansion appears feasible. The applicant's o:.-site evaluator must confirm that the extension is feasible and provide an amended septic design and plan for septic contractor to install this spring. The on-site evaluator will also be asked to confirm that there is suitable area for an alternate system at a 7 bedroom use level. Staff has asked that this septic information be submitted before formal action of the Planning Commission. Mr. Jensen has advised that it will be available for staff review prior to the January 22nd meeting. Zoning JanuarV 1991 '■ Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit for a non-rental apartment within the residence located at 315 Tonkawa Road subject to there being adequate septic capacity on the property to support an additional bedroom use within the existing primary system and future alternate on-site sewage treatment site. Isv I Y.'i I ; Zoning File #1613 February 4» 1991 Page 3 Additloiial COMents and Planning ComiiLission Recommendation - Additional Bshibit - Exhibit I - Additional System Design Information The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the conditional use permit for the non-rental apartment within the newly constructed residence located at 315 Tonkawa Road finding the proposed layout of the interior apartment met all standards required for guest apartments. The additional septic design information (Exhibit I)f confirmed that the existing mound system could be expanded to include the seventh bedroom use and that the alternate septic site and proposed mound syscem could also support a seven bedroom use. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission's recommendation. 4 :, m A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 4 (A) PILE #1613 WHEREAS, Jensen Hemes Inc. (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in the property located at 315 TonJeawa Road located within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as Tract C, RIS #540, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit to permit a non-rental guest apartment per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 4 (A). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1613. 2. The property is located in the LR-IA Lakeshore Residential zoning District requiring 2 acres minimum dry buildable lands. The property consists of 3+ acres in area. 3. On January 22, 1991, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the application as proposed and recommended approval based on the following findings: A) The rural property contains adequate area to meet the septic needs at a 7 bedroom level use for current and future needs. B) The property contains 3+ acres of land where only 2 acres is required. C) The applicant has present-d a valid need for the non-rental guest apartment. D) The interior design and layout of t.ie non-rental guest apartment within the principal structure satisfies all pertinent standards of f e zoning code. Page 1 of 4 h; 4. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow a non-rental guest apartment will not be be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City, 5, The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the affect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the community. CONCLOSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 4 (A) to permit the installation of a non-rental guest apartment within the residence located at 315 Tonkawa Road, subject to the following conditions: 1. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (February 11, 1992). 2. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 3. The undersigned persons have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 2 of 4 ■# 4 kklt ‘ I. Adopted bv th*.* ' rono City Council on this 11th day of February, 1991. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City ClerK Barr-va A. Peterson, Mayor Proper^'' Owner(s) Applicant(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 11th day February, 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. STATE OP MINNESOTA ) Notary Public ) ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) On this _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ day of __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _r 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC r age 3 of 4 CITY OP OROHO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICA X j \ k‘. PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 315 Tonkawa Road. Qrono Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) n6-nJ-?T-tAnn?T PX^AS0 attach le^al description to application if not inciuded on required survey. APPLICANT Mane Phone (home) Jensen Homes, Inc.Phone (work)_475ifl54a •- X ’ C ~ \\« w ^ ^ ^ »«v • « 4. .“-'i* 'CU Address 601 Lakeshore Parkway, Suite #1225 City Minneton ka ^ip 55343 ■— -v; OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Frank Bennett_____________ Phone (home) 374-5118 Phone 334-5600 _____ Address 1915 Knox Avenue South City Mi nneanol i s Zip (month/year)Date Property Acquired December 3. 1990 _________ I (do) folo^totj also own the adjacent parcels of land FEES - CONDITIONAL USB PEfOUTS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) X $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Xm Grading# seawall# retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule APPLICATIONS _ _ _ $200.00 $250.OC $175.00 $ 50.00 $250.00 $100.00 Connercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Sasoner '• Vacation EasMieir.'' Vacation with Subdivision Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Appeals ■ i( ‘r* . Other - see fee schedule PIBSBNT OSB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property TT } Residential Other (specify) OUPTIOM OP REQUEST Describe request in detail: housekeeper and nannv. Tn fini<;h «;pprQ ciiitAhlo fnr QOIBBD SUBMITTALS Cenpleted Application Form. Certified Property owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain thie list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. TOO ARB RBQUIRBD TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGB DOCUMBNTS OR A 1I0RXIB6 COPY (II* X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. Tha applicant and Property Owner must sign th.^ . application. flease ranamber that your application is not complete if above information has not baan included. Certification by clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 4. 7. RffLZCAMT*S 8I6HATURB Tha applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or raquastad by tha zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff tiaa not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred In review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Date /2 - - 9^ 'I—IP SIGMATURB The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date /-2// 3 / Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Caanid.ssion Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building 4 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. b. MM OATf U/IO/M MTCN 002 ca NEItCPIN COUNTY OOOPCRTY INrORtUTION SYSTEM PROPERTY OMERS LIST POOP AOOR OWCR NMC TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OMNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR OMNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR AOOR QM«R NAME .] TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR f- ■> 0»0«R NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR AOOR OMNER NAME TAXPAYER NAIC/AOOR so 0S-117-ES 22 0007 0S9A0 OAYSIOE RO MICHAEL O FILORANOT MICHAEL FILORATOT SMO OAYSIOE RO MAPLE PLAIN »M 55S5T SO 05-117-2S 25 0021 00509 NESTLAKE ST 0 S PERL A 0 J PERL GREOO S A OETTE J PERL S09 N LAKE ST LONO LAKE Ml S5S5* SO 05-117-23 25 0029 00591 NESTLAKE ST RONALO 6 A OEOOIE K OLSEN RONALD OLSEN 391 N LAKE ST LONO LAKE MN 5SS59 SO 05-117-2S 2S 0055 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO MICHAEL 0 FILORANOT MICHAEL FILORANOT 5990 OAYSIOE RO MAPLE PLAIN HN 55559 09-117-25 19 0019 OAYSIOE RO N J A M M HARRINGTON NARK A MONICA HARRINGTON 9000 OAYSIOE RO NAPU PUIN m 55559 50 09-117-25 19 0019 09195 OAYSIOE RO J A N ALT JAMES A A MARIE A ALT 9195 OAYSIOE RO ORONO »M 55559 mm REPORT NO. P19SS901 PAGE 2 50 OS-117-25 25 0009 0!995 OAYSIOE RO FREO OLANCH JR FRED OLANCH JR 5995 OAYSIOE RO LONG LAKE HN 55559 50 05-117-23 25 0020 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO GREGG S A OETTE J PERL GREGG S A OETTE J PERL 509 N LAKE ST LONG LAKE m 55559 58 05-117-25 25 0022 00525 NESTLAKE ST RAD OLSEN RONALD 0 OLSEN 591 NEST LAKE ST LONS LAKE 794 55559 58 05-117-25 25 0025 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO RAO OLSEN RONALO 0 OLSEN 591 NEST LAKE ST LONG LAKE >94 55559 58 05-117-25 23 0025 00599 NESTLAKE ST E T ANDERSON AML R1CKET1 EDNA T ANDERSON 599 H LAKE ST LONG LAKE MN 55359 58 05-117-25 23 0029 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGMED E C GAGE 111 A 8 C GAGE EONIN 111 A BAROARA GAGE 990 T074KANA RO LONO LAKE »fl 65559 38 09-117-23 11 0009 09010 BAYSIOE RO CURTIS A ELIZABETH LCVAN6 CURTIS A ELIZABETH LEVAN6 9010 BAYSIOE RD MAPLE PLAIN 791 55359 58 09-117-23 19 0005 09095 BAYSIOE RD JOHN 0 NCOONELL JOHN 0 HCOONELL 9095 BAYSIOE RO NAPLF PLAIN 794 S55S9 38 09-117-23 19 0017 09105 BAYSIOE RO J041N 0 MCOOHELL J044N 0 MCOOHELL 9095 BAYSIOE RO Maple plain 494 55359 58 09-117-25 19 0018 09155 BAYSIOE RO CHARLES N A HELEN F HAYSSElP CHARLES N A HELEN F HAYSSEN 9155 BAYSIOE RO TUPLE PLAIN 794 55559 58 09-117-23 19 0020 00905 TOTAIAMA RO K A C OLDOLPH 111 KARL A CHRISTINE DEOOLPH C/0 KI4UT-K0UPEE PO BOX 0950 MPLS MN 55908 58 09-117-23 19 0021 F 8 BE7ME1T A M N BCttCTT F 8 BETtCTT ANN BCNCTT 315 TOlUAMA RO 0R0I40 794 S51S9 NUN OATC 12/10/M BATCH 002 c \\HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORtUTION SYSTEM PROPERTY OtJERS LIST REPORT NO. PIASSAOl PAGE S PROP RDOR IM«N NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR TOTAL BAKH 002 00010 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEfOIEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KN0HLE06E AND BELIEF. DATE ■f 1915 Knox Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55403 December 14, 1990 de: 1 7 S ^ Planning Commission and City Council Members City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 To Whom It Mav Concern: This letter is to support our application for a conditional use permit as it relates the construction of a lower level apartment in our new residence at 315 Tonkawa Road in Orono. We purchased this house on December 3,1990 and need to construct a lower level apartment for our domestic employee before we move in April 1990. We ask that you grant this conditional use permit as expeditiously as possible, so that we may complete the construction before we have to move out of our old house in Minneapolis. We need to construct this apartment in our new house for a domestic employee to assist our family, specifically our oldest daughter, on a daily basis. Our oldest daughter was bom with a wide range of special needs and requires more assistance than we alone can give her. After searching for the past two years, we decided to move to Orono because of the excellent public school system and the responsiveness of the school district personnel to meet our daughter's special, unique needs. This apartment is intended for the direct use only of a single or married domestic employee while they are in our employ. We are not going to use the space as a rental apartment to produce any income. The apartment will be provided as a employment benefit to the domestic employee. If you have any questions regarding our plans or our situation, please don’t hesitate to call me at my office, 334-5600. Sincerely, Frank B. Bennett h; ' • ..................... r? k: if- m :tE-r:;-.*.• 4?vV m IW •r fc-v [%-'■■>ir .'t*. .f- . K -V y • >/• jtiiiiiiii A.% m ^J) /« 4-* • /rt ' oMOUI.T) EtSICm PROCEDURE (For FlouaLup \o 120C gpci) A. Sewage Flow Race See D-7 or I»3, 4, or 5, or use metered value; Flow Rate «^ ^rc _S?d B. Septic Tank Liquid Volume (see C-3 or C-5) gallons / C. Soil Cheracccrlscics 1. Depth to restricting layer such as seasonally saturated soil, bedrock, coarse soil, y 2 inches ^etc. ; _ 2. Depth of percolation tests; /ff inches ^ 3. Number or p<^rcoiacion test holes;holeb 4. Ave. percolation race; /2 .4 npi 5. Landslope D. Rocl-; Laver Dimensions 1. Multiply gpd by 0.S3 to obtain require! area of rock layer; gpd X 0.83 ■ 7SO sq ft / 2. Select width of rock layer (10 feet cr less) • /C’ feet 3. Length of rock layer • Area - Width 7SO sq ft - ft • 7S.O ft ‘ / E. Rock V '.ume 1. Multiply rock area by rock dept!; CO get cubic fe^ of rocl^ 7 sq f t X £t f c 2. Divide cu ItfiY 27 ciHATcu yd to gee cubic yards; J‘ 3. Multiply cubic yards by 1.4 to get weight of rock in tons; 2CS-2c \i yds X 1.4 ■ ??. /7tons / ?rccsurc Dislribulion Svstc:.’ Saiccc number o; periorcLC/ Inccrais ^ Sclecr perforatioiv 4 4.7 3. Select perforated lateral length; Note if manifold it at end of rock layer, loccr.il length is rock layer Icn;?::; less half a perforation spacing. If manifold is center of rock laver, lateral lc;igch is ono-iial: roc%.r» length less half a perfor.::iar. snacinp. length •* Perf ora ccc! f Ccc! latur.y^ W • w Divide laceral lengih by n • c o ^ •" nerforaiions per later;:! ■ ' r feet r 2 -cut - h'ctc: last perforation mu^it bt y e^ > in end cap. see page K-l!' Multiply perforations per lateral by number o to get cocai number of perforations; ' r>cr:s/lat ;</ ^- i a c r - y 6. Determine required flow by multiplying number perforations by flow per' perforation (see page 7 -• perfs x Q. ^Vgpm/perf gp::; V IV r^Ku 7.7T3>e«s^i > * VVc. Select minimum required* laicr.'i! diameter from table on Page E-17; enter table with perforation spacing, perforation diameter, and number of perforations pur lateral. Select miniimm diameter for perf ora ^e<nate?\l ■ inches G. Basal V.’idth (IV fb ''/•‘(■"ICH. I. Parcolacion race in cop *.2 inches of soil is 7 mpi Select allowable soil loadlnn rate from table on page E-le; *. "y_spd/ft2 I • h i1 ■^vs l*T’ I''- !uhi ft- :i:- ■’:vbft' . htLfe-> te i^‘uf ■I:' '?V il-r h tftjhv- ADDITIONAL SYSTEM DESIGN INFORMATION FOR JENSEN HOMES IN TRACT C, R.L.S. # 540 ORONO, MINNESOTA 1-19-91 For an additional 7th bedroon rather than tne 6 bedroom de­ sign, an additional 12.5 feet of rock bed is needed. This should be rounded off to 15 additional feet with the dike e'-tended as well. In looking at this site, this can only be accomplished by adding onto the north end of the existing- mcund system. The alternate site would also need to be expanded 15 feet to the north and remain undisturbed. This alternate site is the old primary site on the 1-17-90 drawing since the old alternate site is where the mound was constructed. In constructing this additional 15 feet, care mu^t be taken to insure that runoff water is still directed around the north end of the mound and does not. sit anywhere. If any other information is needed, please contact me. Sincerely, PERCOR, INC. Mark S. Gronberg, PCA certified i*:;. ' ^ t xT'' ,r‘ jMt .. 1&91-% « « To: Pro-i; Date: Subject Mayor Peterson & Orono Council Menbers Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Mem.bers City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zcnina Adm.inistrator ♦iW January 15, 1991 #1615 Gary Mroz & Ken Hopkins, 59 Ferndale Green - Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing % Pertinent Ordinance- Section 11.03 1. Definition 65 - Definition of Subdivision. 2. Definition 66 - Subdivision Classification. See Class III Subdivision. This subdivision involves a flexible zoning application. Please note the conditional use permit and variance application that involves the review of a proposed shared private driveway installed over a portion of a designated wetland shall be reviewed as a separate application (Application #1616). 3. Definition 24 - Lot Area Minimum. Proposed Lot 2 shall be served with sewer and water. Although technically the applicant would have the right to seek credit for the wetlands area, the applicant proposes development per rural standards with a dry buildable envelope of 2.34 acres. Lot 1 proposed with on-site septic and well meets the 2 acre dry buildable contiguous standards. Total Area = 270,045 s.f or 6.2 acres Total Area Wetlands = 48,425 s.f. or 1.11 acres Lot 1=2 acres Lot 2 = 3.19 acres (dry acres = 2.34, wet = .85) 4. Definition 26 - Lot, Outlot. A lot which is intended only for public or private roadways, open space or other use, which use must be restricted by the appropriate easement and which use must be approved by the City at the time of final plat approval. The use of the outlot will thereafter be restricted by the appropriate restrictive covenant or open space easement. Zoning File #1615 January 15, 1991 Page»' 2 . "N 0* * Id.it qf Exhibits Exhibit A Ei^iibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K Exhibit L Exhibit M Exhibit N Application Applicants Addendum Property Owners List Plat Map MCWD Report 12/05/90 Department of Army Report 10/24/90 Gaffron Report and Geptic Sketch Site Evaluator Septic Map Planning Commission Minutes 11/19/90 Comprehensive Survey of Wayzata Country Club Wetlands Map Survey Cook's Report Sketch of Lot I's Building Envelope Review of Application - Please review Exhibit I, the Planning Commission minutes for the review of the sketch plan application for the property. It is the applicants position that the only variances sought with this subdivision would be a variance to encroach the wetlands with the construction of the shared access drive. The applicant has designated an outlet for access use. The 1.01 acre outlet area is excluded from the areas of Lot 1 and 2. Lot Configuration Each lot meets the required 200' lot width to the rear of the front 50' setback line. Lot 2 is to be developed with sewer and water. Lot 8 of the Allo-Rae Terrace plat was already assessed for one sewer and one water unit. Applicant does not seek credit of the wetland area and has proposed development with rural standards. Review Exhibit K. Note the City's wetland maps show the drainageway being included as a portion of the designated wetland. During at least three site inspections of this" property, staff has reviewed this portion of the drainage/wetland area and notes the following: Drainage from the wetland is taken via an open ditch to a culvert and underground drain tile that carries drainage from the wetland through the golf course and its network of artificial ponds and drainageways and eventually to Lake Minnetonka. It was not known at the time of the many site inspections that there was another underground drainage tile leading northward through Lot 2 and then eventually draining to the west through the golf course (Exhibit L). The Code will require that these areas be designated as drainageways at a 15' minimum width. The Orono staff has confirmed that these areas are nov part of the designated wetland Zoning File #1615 January 15, 1991 Page 3 but are drainageways. As a result, the areas on either side of these drainageways are included in the dry buildable continguous envelope. The prelirrinary plan must be amended to include a 15' wide drainageway over the open ditch area of Lot 2. This must also include a 15' drainage easement over the underground tile that extends northward and then eventually west through Let 2. Lot 1 is to be developed per rural standards. In reviewing the preliminary plat and on-site evaluator's mapping, staff found inaccuracies in the placement of these im.provements on preliminary plan. Gaffron has resketched the proposed building site and drainfield locations (review Exhibits G and K) and a copy has been sent to applicant's surveyor. Please note the majority of the building site is located within the City of Wayzata. Staff has been advised that the applicant has filed a subdivision application with the City of Wayzata. The applicants preliminary plans will be conceptually reviewed by the Wayzata staff in January. Staff reviewed the zoning and setback information with Wayzata. The zoning is residential and setbacks are 45' front, 50' rear and 20' side. In reviewing the setbacks of the proposed building envelope for Lot 1, there would appear to be no problem (review Exhibit H). Please refer to Exhibit L, the preliminary plan, specifically, the section identified as Property Identification Sketch. Please note the majority of the properties within this subdivision are divided off of a parcel defined as PIN 36-118-23 44 0001. The remaining portion of this property must be shown as a lot and included on the preliminary plan. Existing improvements need not be shown nor will it be necessary to define drainageways through the larger Country Club parcel. This property must be included as we are altering the legal description of the entire property. Drainage/Wetland The Minnehaha Creek Watershed preliminary report (Exhibit E) suggests that drainage flows eastward to Gleason Lake. More recent information shows that drainage flows under US Highway 12 from the south and east and flows into the wetland area. Drainage then flows from the wetlands into the drainage tiles and drainage ditch at the west and north edges of the wetland. It is most important that the drainageways be defined as drainage easements on the plat and appropriate easements be taken over them. The areas of the drainage easements must be excluded from the dry buildable area of Lot 2. Drainage easements will be taken over the wetlands area also. The wetlands and drainageways must be defined in Outlet A. Zoning File #1615 January 15, 1991 Pace 4 Sewer and Hater Lot 2 shall be served with sewer and water seeking the credit of the assessment already placed against Lot 8 of the Allo-Rae Terrace plat. The City is asked to consider sewer and water service to Lot 1. Once again, applicant proposes no changes from rural development standards. Gaffron has confirmed that the site can be developed at rural standards. Applicants' consultant reports that the City of Wayzata would take no issue with the sewering of Lot 1 if the City of Orono approves. It may be necessary to have a separate Comp Plan amendment if Lot 1 was to be included within a sewer and water district. The City Engineer will be asked to comment on this. It may not be necessary as rural standards are to still be retained. Please note Mr. Cook recommends extension of sewer and water to Lot 1 (Exhibit M). Park Dedication The Park Commission reviewed the subdivision to determine if additional park lands or trails were to be taken from the subject property and decided against the taking of any additional lands. Fees will be requested in lieu of lands for park purposes. The assessor has been asked to determine the fair market value of the undeveloped land to determine the park dedication fee. Applicant will be advised as soon as the City is in receipt of this report. Site Grading Improveinents Special land alterations proposed with development of property shall be reviewed under conditional use permit application. The berm area and fencing along east boundary of Lot 1 shall be covered under Application #1616. Issues for Consideration 1.Members may remember that the original sketch plan showed outlets created along the east border of Lot 2. Outlots were to be legally combined with adjacent residential properties. It is apparent that Lot 2 will need the additional dry buildable. In the applicants addendum (Exhibit B), we are advised by the applicants that the Wayzata Country Club will maintain the northern portions of Lot 2 and that they will allow access to the adjacent landowners over this portion of the property. In reviewing Definition 24, Minimum Lot Area, if pfdistrian easements are to be granted, these areas must be excluded from the dry buildable area of Lot 2. As a result, access can not be Zoning File #1615 January 15, 1991 Page 5 granted via private easements and may only exist on an informal basis. Per the subdivision regulations of the City, the creation of all easements must be approved by the City. Does Planning Commission see any problem with the Country Club maintaining this portion of the property (area to immediate north of wetlands)? 2. What is your recommendation concerning request to extend sewer and water to Lot 1? 3. The City's Code provides few guidelines for the creation and design of new lots. The lots have an approved method of access and meet the required lot width at the setback line. The shape of the parcel to be divided is determined by the existing improvements within the used portions of the golf course. Planning Commission members voiced concern during the sketch plan review that the lots appeared contrived. What is your opinion of the layout of the lots with the amended plan? Options of Action Denial - Please refer to the necessary sections within your Subdivision Code for the necessary findings. Table - Pending receipt of an updated preliminary survey and conceptual direction from Wayzata as to the staff recommendations regarding the subdivision. Preliminary Plan to include the following: 1. Designate 15' wide drainageway easements over drainageways in Lot 2 and exclude areas of drainageways from dry buildable. 2. Include remainder of PIN 36-118-23 44 0001 as a lot. 3. Designate wetlands area within Outlet A and cuvlert area as drainage easements. 4. Locate septic envelope and building envelope on Lot 1 per staff sketch. Isv il'Wi Zoning File #1615 February 4, 1991 Page 6 Additional Comments and Planning Commission Recommendation - The applicants' surveyor provided an amended preliminary plan (Exhibit L) at the Planning Commission's public hearing confirming Lot 2's dry buildable land at 2.11 acres. The plan also relocated the septic envelope and building envelope fot" Lot 1 per staff's direction. Please note the Planning Com.missicn recommendation did not include sewer and water to Lot 1, and preferred that the matter be addressed by the Council. It is staff's understanding that the applicants will formally recuest sewer and water to Lot 1 before the Council. As for serving Lot 1 with municipal water and sewer, staff unanimously recommends providing municipal services to Lot 1 based on the following findings: 1. Applicants' subdivision proposal has been based on existj.ng standards of the RR—IB rural zoning district. 2. Applicants' on-site evaluator has confirmed reconfirmed by Mike Gaffron that Lot 1 can be developed with on-site septic. 3. Sewer and water lines will be installed within Outlet A to serve Lot 2. The sewering of Lot 1 will not involve any greater impact on the wetland area. In fact, extensions to Lot 1 will be located out of the protected wetland area. The City of Wayzata has asked that if sewer and water is approved for Lot 1 that permits be obtained from Wayzata offices. In turn sewer and water permits would be issued by the City of Orono for Lot 2. As the lines connecting both houses to municipal services would be via Orono sewer and water lines within Ferndale Green. It is not clear to staff why Wayzata must issue permits to Lot 2. Staff will meet the week of February 4th to resolve this matter. Staff will report to Council as to the final resolve of this matter between the Cities. As for the building permit for Lot 1, based on the final location of the house in relation to the municipal boundary line, a percentage of the building permit for Lot 1 will be given to the City of Wayzata. The City already has agreements in place as to the regular billing of the sewer and water use. Once installed, both homes will be billed by the City of Orono. r miZoning File #1615 Feburary A, 1991 Page 7 Please note the revised plan also shows the remainder of PIN 36-118-23 44 0001 as Outlot B. In reviewing Exhibit J, the comprehensive survey of the Wayzata Country Club, the designation of an outlot would be acceptable as there are no structural improvements within the parcel. The City will also not require specific drainageways or ponding areas to be shown within the outlot. Outlot B is predominantly the greens area of the golf course . The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the subdivision finding that each lot has been developed without the need to grant variances to lot standards of the RR-IB zoning district. Please note the conditional use permit/variance application for the construction of the shared drive and installation of utilities is reviewed as a separate application (#1616). The enclosed resolution granting approval of the preliminary subdivision of two lots has been drafted per the approval recommendation of the Planning Commission. The issue of providing sewer and water to Lot 1 will be addressed in the resolution when the Council has made a final determination. if III -| ^ . . . l' A RESOLOTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OP THE PLAT OF FAIRWAY HILLS ADDITION FILE NO. 1615 WHEREAS, Kenneth R. Hopkins and Gary D. Mroz (hereinafter "the applicants”) on December 28, 1990 filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of ^ two lot residential plat of property legally described in Exhibit A, attached (hereinafter "the property") and; WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statues 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and Platting Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 22, 1991 at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on February 11, 1991 the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of the applicants, noting the following findings of fact: 1. The property is located within the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. 2. The property contains a total of approximately 26.3 acres. All of the proposed residential lots meet the required 2 acre dry contiguous land area, as follows: Lot 1=2 acres Lot 2 = 2.11 acres (1.08 wetlands) Outlet A = 1.01 acres (.75 dry; .26 wet) Outlet B = 20.1 acres 3. Portions of Lot 2 have been assessed a sewer and water unit and shall be served by municipal services yet retain current rural standards for development. 4, Lot 1 has been found to have suitable soils to support on-site sewage treatment facilities to serve current and future needs. Page 1 of 4 mm 5. Lots 1 and 2 have been found to savisfy all rural standards of the RR-IB zoning district. 6. Outlot A has been created for the sole purpose of access. The access road within Outlot A shall serve Lots 1 and 2. Applicants shall develop covenants for the maintenance of the road and culverts and' the responsibility for maintenance of yard areas within the dry buildable portion of Outlot A and eastern portion of Lot 2. 7. Outlot B has been created to define the remaining portion of the property for future development. Outlot B contains no structures as of this platting and serves as open space areas consisting of the greens area of the golf course. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat of Fairway Hills Addition per the survey dated December 14, 19v0, revised January 22, 1991 by Raymond A. Prasch of Lot Surveys Company, Inc., subject to the following conditions; 1. The installation of utilities and driveway within Outlot A shall be subject to the conditions set forth in the resolution approving a conditional use permit and variance for all land alterations. 2. Building permits for residential construction on both Lots 1 and 2 shall be issued by the City of Orono. Sewer and water permits shall be issued by the City of Orono for Lot 2. If Lot 1 is to be served by municipal sewer and water, permits shall be issued by_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __. The billing for sewer and water usage shall the responsibility of the City of Orono. 3. Building permits will not be issued for new construction until the plat is granted final approval and utilities are installed and the access road has been approved by the City Engineer for safe use by municipal inspection vehicles. Final utilities plans and road construction plans must be approved by the City Engineer prior to installation. The City will ask applicants to execute a developers' agreement and provide a letter of credit to cover 150% of the cost of the proposed improvements. Page 2 of 4 FINAL PLAT SDBMITTALS The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month; A. RECORD PLAT drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1"=200'. Drawing to include: a) Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Raymond A. Prasch of Lot Surveyors Company Inc. dated December 14, 1990, revised January 22, 1991. b) Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10’ wide along all perimeter property lines and 5' each side of internal property lines. c) Designation and dedication of a drainage easement over wetlands and drainageways within Out lot A and Lot 2. d) Designation of Outlets A and B per plat drawings. B. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required; a) Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. b) The applicants must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. c) Signed and executed Flowage & Conservation Easement over the wetlands/drainageways within Cutlot A and Lot 2. Please review sample drainage easement enclosed herewith. Please make necessary amendments to include shared driveway to be installed and maintained within designated wetland. d) Signed and executed developers' agreement and letter of credit for installation of sewer and water improvements and private driveway. Applicant to provide letter of credit at 150% of actual cost of improvements. Page 3 of 4 r UUiW e) Signed and executed Road and Utilities Easement over Outlot A. If shared sewer and water lines extend beyond boundaries of Outlot A, legal description must be expanded to include this area. f) Copy of private covenants to cover ownership/maintenance of road and culverts and yard areas within Outlot A. Applicants may wish to expand to maintenance of dry land areas of Lot 2 along east boundaries. C. FEES TO BE PAID: Total Due $_ _ _ _ _ _ a) Park dedication - Park Commission will accept park fee in lieu of lands. Rolf Erickson, City Assessor, has been asked to determine the fair market value of the lands inclusive of Lots 1 and 2 and Outlot A. Applicants to be advised as soon as Mr. Eric .son has submitted his findings. b) Final plat fee = $150.00. c) Legal review and filing fees of $150.00. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 11th day of February, 1991. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 11th day of February, 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 4 ■I .•rjCITY OP ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION 9 M ^ ^ mm mm mm mm mm mm ^ mm ^ mm ^ mm mm ^ ^ ^ mm mm ^ mm mm mm ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ mm mm ^ mmm ^ mm mm ^ ^ *32/"22S PROPERTY LOCATION ( J i Site Address * ii 4 I . 4 ’JT~».. n v» Property Identification Nimber (P.I.D.)••••-— i.' 1 • *-.V.vw Please check one - Property aostract or torrens?-■:.N W . i.' • V Attach legal description to application. >* ^ •» •» — — — — —— — ^ — —» —• — — — ' • io ^ * • j > . • I - - V « fc V r-n r V>U • • «. V . - APPLICANT -Phone (home)— f V'X M •» .^. A ^ k. - ■ Nanne t-•u Phone (work)*r Address: tf ^1* * ^ ^ * m Zio: ..'OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Ncune Phone (work) Address: L'^ci'^”’ •Zio: •'f ) (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Develocment Site ; / Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check)Residential; no. of units Other (soecifv) Present Zonino District - PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes X Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites:Existing Units New Units Total Units — Proposed Gross Density;Units per Acres — Minimum Lot Size:4 ^ ^Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use: (check)Residential Other (specify) r «MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR CCMPLSTS ^LIMIN^Y AERL-ICATIUN .. Comcleted Acplication Form2. Preliminary* Plat information on Certificate of Sur-.-ey.3^ Property Owners List or owners within 350 (you must obtainthis list from Hennepin County Department or Finance A-503 Govt Canter348-3271). , ^ ^As an addendt:m to this application, p.ease attach a separaue lis^ o,.any other persons you wish notified of this application.Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application isromplete.Jcning Official's Signature Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. Title opinion. Easements, Covenants, etc. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. ertification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Appli'cation is complete, cning Official's Signature Date Date EES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II s HI) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) Preliminary Review (Class III and all non—residential) Final Plat Review (Class HI) *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) $150.00 250.00 250.OC 300.00 + 20.00/Lot 150.00* ‘he apolicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or ■equested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, banning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. '->C•ir Applicant's Signature Date 1 ''Z.l - o Owner's Signature Date ; ,1 _ 2 / - Voolicant must have all subiWittals iniJo the City offices 25 days before the pVanning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If inable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to ha\e an luthorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building S Zoni g Dffice of this change prior to the meeting. CT' JAtJ 5 1991 January 2, 1991 Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Administrator CITY OF ORONO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Fairway Hills Subdivision Dear Ms. Mabusth: We have a purchase agreement with the wcc for the property referred to above subject to the City of Orono's approval of this subdivision. Our plans for the proposed subdivision have been provided for your consideration. The plans for subdividing this 6+ acre property into two lots have been drawn based upon comment from the Orono Planning Commission and City staff. Based upon the engineer's report, we respectfully request city water and sewer to Lot 2 and, if possible, to Lot 1. It is our intention that the property adjacent to the course and the homes beginning with John Powers residence be maintained by WCC and to allow these homeowners to access the golf course across our property. Should you have any questions, please contact me at 861-8607. Sincerely, Kenneth R. Hopkins A Gary Mroz KRH:GM:pb mJN DATE 12/21/90 BATCH 001 HENNEPIN COUT4TY PROPERTY INFORMAllON SYSTEM PROPERTY OILERS LIST REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 1 PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHC/AOOR 38 36-118-23 99 0001 00038 ADDRESS UMASSIGr4ED HAYZATA C0UT4TRY CLUB HAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB P 0 BOX 151 HAYZATA MN 55391 38 36-118-23 99 0002 00095 FERNOALE GREEN 0 S G OSER DAVID M OSER 95 FERNOALE GREEN HAYZATA MN 55391 38 36-118-23 99 0005 00085 FERNOALE RD N HILFRED D GAGNE A NIFE N D GAGNE 65 NORTH FERNOALE HAYZATA MN 55391 PROP ADDR OltCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 36-118-23 99 0006 00075 FERNOALE RD N TERRY D JOItt^ON TERRY D JOHNSON 75 FERNOALE RD N HAYZATA MN 55391 38 36-118-23 99 0007 00070 FERNOALE GREEN H STEINKRAUS A B MCMILLAN HALTER J STEINKRAUS AND BARBARA MCMILLAN 70 FERNOALE GRI.EN HAYZATA MN 55591 38 36-118-23 99 0006 00090 FERNOALE GREEN J R COLEMAN ABM COLEMAN JOHN R COLEMAN 90 FERNOALE GREEN HAYZATA MN 55391 PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR 0K4IER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAK/AODR 38 36-118-23 99 0009 00100 FERNOALE GREEN P 6 FARNANO A C H FARNAND PATRICK G A CAROLYN FARNAND 100 FERNOALE GREEN HAYZATA m 55391 38 36-118-23 99 0012 00065 FEm40ALE GREEN HAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB HAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB P O BOX 151 HAYZATA m 55391 38 36-118-23 99 0015 00095 FERI40ALE GREEN GRETCHEN BUHLER OSER GRETCHEN B OSER 95 FERNOALE GREEN HAYZATA MN 55391 99 31-118-22 33 0051 00360 FERNOALE RD N VAN EECKItOUT BLDG CORP VAN EECKHOUT BLOG CORP 1935 H HAYZATA BLVD LONG LAKE MT4 55356 30 36-118-23 99 0010 00095 FERT4DALE GREEN CHARLES A HULSE CHARLES A HULSE 95 FERNOALE GREEN HAYZATA 55391 38 36-118-23 99 0013 00038 ADDRESS UTMSSIGNED HAYZATA COUrnRY CLUB HAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB P 0 BOX 151 HAYZATA MN 55391 99 01-117-23 11 0001 00197 HAYZATA BLVD I HAYZATA COUmRY CLUB HAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB BOX 151 HAYZATA MN 55391 99 31-118-22 33 0052 00350 FERNOALE RD N GEORGE L 8 MARY LEE G VEIT GEORGE L 8 MARY LEE 6 VEIT 350 FERNOALE RD N HAYZATA MN 55591 38 36-118-23 99 0011 00085 FERNOALE GREEN JAR POKERS JOHN A ROXANNE POKERS 85 FERNOALE GREEN HAYZATA MN 55391 38 36-118-23 99 0019 00055 FERNOALE GREEN HILLIAM A MUELLER HILLIAM A MUELLER 55 FERNOALE GREEN HAYZATA MN 55391 99 31-118-22 33 0098 00399 FERNOALE RD N A D JACQUES 8 S J JACQUES ALISTAIR D/SUZAft4E J JACQUES 399 FERNOALE RD N HAYZATA MN 55391 TOTAL BATCH 001 00017 I: i: ■I ;)•s ^ MM DATE 12/?l/90 HENNEPIM COUMTV PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 0HNER5 LIST REPORT NO. PX4S5401 PAGE 2BATCH 001 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF / < m (IJ) I /•-J \ ^ m V ' ’I ^ ':--^ -w ^ ff •*’ » M [.■•;■'feu- r-^-^T-* • , > -i . 4 r . i •S-- -* i r 1-k/ ^ ^J /. ^— J _.i tj I7> /i;« *4X"\ • S ____1 f ?’) >/ 'T1 V J# »/ i-cr V n ■? /?.;,) i •n •. i -n I ■'. ( M) J ( Ml S' LN / ' U?)TT^X ^ r*-*/ iif,? *•) 3 1 4»> I ■:' !►..-sr** « k « .- •' .y \l f*X z''% « ^M V .X .?3f ^., •••* 9 iir «i h............rti- y 7 c* •T) ’>'4» / ’•■•’ / • /vy-’-y"" / Xy -y i’ > y ? *9J / I I • -'^ Jh / I -B'^ . ■<. ■i. •;:»... rfim 'h%) 'li i-l; ■> '■ii 'i •• ••»?!Xi‘>-*'t t;- '■•> f«« '61 • - “f I December 5,1990 DEC 7 IS Mr. Brent Elliott Winfield Homes 12300 Wayzata Blvd. Minnetonka, MN 55343 Re; Construction of u proposed subdivision and access driveway Dear Mr. Elliott: We have received the information you forwarded concernint; the two-lot single-family residential subdivision and construction of a driveway extending southwest from Ferndale Green in the Cities of Wayzata and Orono. Review of this information indicates that a permit from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District is required. Enclosed please find u set of the District Rules and permit application term. Concerns for this project are outlined in Rule B - Stormwater Management Plans for Individual Projects and Rule D ■ Wetland Alteration. The primary concern is the project s elTect on the hydrologic capacity of the wetland. This includes the effect on water levels off site during and after construction. In addition, appropriate erosion control methods should be in place to prevent the transport of sediment off site during and after construction, and prompt restoration of disturbed areas be completed with seed and mulch or sod. Drainage from the site appears to ultimately flow east through the City of Wayzata into Gleason Lake. The City of Wayzata has developed a stormwater management plan which includes runoff from this area. The plan sets certain criteria for this subwatershed, therefore this project should be coordinated with both the City of Orono and the City of Wayzata. An understanding should be established for the to overall development of the entire subwatershed. Thank you for forwarding the information. If you have any questions, please contact me at 473- 4224. Sincerely, JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC Ronald S. Quanbeck, P.E. cc: Board file i-^ity of Orono City of Wayzata t,,DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ST PAUL CiSTRiCT, CORPS Zf ESGiNEEPS 142T US POST OFFICE 4 CUSTOM MOUSE ST PAUL MiNNESO^'A 55101 WO0 ' f ♦ X • October 24, 1990 "C»v» to AtTCNtlON 0* Construction-Operations Regulatory (90-468N-92) J 7 SUBJECT: Windfield Homes, Access Road Fill, SE 1/4 SE 1/4 Sec. 36, T. 118 N., R. 23 W., Hennepin County, Minnesota Bert Elliot Windfield Homes 12300 Wayzata Boulevard Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343 We have reviewed the information provided us about your project. The work is authorized by a nationwide Department of the Amy permit, provided the enclosed conditions and management practices are followed. Your plan indicates that the 28-foot-wide wetland crossing would cover only about 175 feet. We have not made a field inspection of the site, although the soil survey and wetland maps suggest that the crossing may be slightly longer, perhaps as much as 250-300 feet. Even this longer crossing would be covered by a nationwide permit at this location, however, because the maximum fill would be about 8,400 square feet. The topography on the site makes it unlikely that the crossing would involve more wetland. The area identified as homesites is substantially higher than the wetland. This determination covers only the project referenced above. If the design, location, or purpose of the work changes, you should contact us to make sure the work would not result in a violation of Federal law. In particular, if you plan any additional grading or fill below elevation 964 msl, you should contact our office. Work above this elevation should not require any permit because the wetland should lie below 964 msl, but work below it may Infringe on the wetland. The actual wetland line probably lies somewhere between 959 and 964 msl. This verification will remain valid until the nationwide permit is modified, reissued, or revoked. All the nationwide permits are scheduled to be modified, reissued, or revoked before January 13, 1992. It is your responsibility to remain informed about changes to the nationwide permits. We will issue a public notice announces the changes when they occur. Furthermore, if you begin or are under contract to begin this project before the date the nationwide permit is modified or revoked, you will have 12 months from the date of the modification or revocation to complete the project under the present terms and conditions of this nationwide permit. It Is your resDonsibilitv to insure that the work complies with the terms of this letter and the enclosures. IT IS YOUR RRSPONSiaiLITY' TO OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED STATE AND LOCAL PERIIITS A.ND APPROVALS BEFORE Y’OU PROCEED WITH THE PROJECT. If you have any questions, please call Joe lanta at (612) 220*0362. Enclosures N \. <"Be^ WopatC .y^, \ C^Ief, Regulatory Branch Construction-Operations Division Determination: 330.5(a)(26)(i) ■ Fill in a headwaters wetland. 1.VI I i ,X'A I V MINNKnotA Authority' for the follovln^ activities la given at 33 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR): [5<4 330.5(a)(26) Dlocharges of dredged or fill taaterial Into the waters fcted In paragraphs (a)(26)(l) and (11) of this section except those which cause the loss or substantial adverse nodlficatlon of lO acres or more of such waters of the United States. Including wetlands. For discharges which cause the loss or substantial adverse modification of one to ten acres of such watcrs»lncludlng wetlands, notification to the district engineer Is re<iulred In accordance with Section 350.7 of this section. (Section 404) L (1) Mon-tidal rivers, streams, and their lakes an lopoundments. including adjacent wetlands, that are located above the head waters. (11) Other non-tldal waters of the United States. Including adjacent wetlands, that are not part of a surface tributary to Interstate waters or navigable waters of the United States (i.e.. Isolated waters). Regional Conditions [ ] Majority of the Project Requires State Permits and/or Approvals Xny person Intending to discharge dredged or fill material Into Minnesota- designated "Protected Waters" shall submit an application to the Minnesota Department of Katural Resources (KDKR) before beginning work. Activities are authorlred under this nationwide permit after the applicant obtains all applicable Minnesota Department of Katural Resources (MDNH) and/or Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) permits and approvals. Work may proceed upon receipt of all applicable MDHR and/or MPCA permits and approvals. Other Otate and local authorisations nay be required. This discharge of dredged or fill material would cause the loss or substantial .adverse oodlfIc.atlon of: f ] Less th.an one .acre of waters of the United otates ( ) Hetween t .and 10 .-xcrcs of w.itcrs of the United States Knc I 1 rrvfTMr Mlilr.) Hcff lonal Corulltlon:; ( cor. 11 nucd j Majority of the Prolect Doca Hot lle<iulre ntate rernit:i and/.jr This nationwide permit la subject to Regional Conditions that allow only projects that would drain, fill, or Inundate an area of TiiAH 10.000 SQUARE FEETT of waters of the United States- The project Involves a discharge of dredged or fill material Into the foLlowlag arca(s): f ] TROUT STREAMS - the head waters (and adjacent wetlands) and the ■^j»ibutarles (and adjacent wetlands) of these streams- [ ] FEDERAL WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS (ST. CROIX RIVER) - all head waters (Md adjacent wetlands) of these streams. r—] LAKES/WETLANDS LARGER THAN 10 ACRES - all wetlands adjacent to these head water lakes and wetlands. These areas are Identified by MDNR on their ■Public Waters/Wetlands Inventory" naps. r—] STATE PROTECTED WATERS LARGER TRAN 10 ACRES - wetlands a^acent to these Isolated waters. These lakes arc Identified by MDKR on their “Public Waters/Wetlands In-'cntory* maps. ^><j^ecause the project does not involve a discharge of dredged or fill ^^erial into any of the areas listed above, this nationwide permit authorizes fill in waters of the United States (including wetlands) that causes the loss or substantial adverse modification of waters of the United States. of less than one acre V Th. (oUovln, K*^I^C^HQ^T PRACTICES ih.ll be ‘ ‘ P.llute to comply with th.ee pt.ctic.e may be the edveree effecte of th.ee dlechetgee on the dl.c/etlon.r> authority to regulate reuse tor th. Dl.ttict Engineer to r.oonn.nd or th. "““jO 8 of this pert, th. ectlvlty on an Indlyldu.l or r.glon.l b.el. pur.uent to Section 330.8 of P 1. Olech.rge. of dredged or fill net.rl.l Into ueter. of th. United State, eh.ll be .voided through th« use of other precticel elternscivee. 2. Discharges in spawning areas during spawning aeasone eholl bo avoided. p....’g. o“f‘;r.‘i'or‘*‘:i;.c»Vh*i*g'h'S"ou°'. tr:i:.:''!hn:ro'c":t"nT “t'h ‘: v^^^^‘^lle.v•th:;rrn.'" p^rp'o.: r, fill is to inpound waters). A. If th. dl.ch.rg. creete. en Inpound.ent of ueter. tcceltreced peseege of ueter end/or th. reetrlctlon of It. flou .hell be nlnlolxed. 5. Discharge In wetland areas shall be avoided- 6. Heavy equipnent working in wetlands ehall be placed on mats. 7. Discharge into breeding areas for migratory waterfowl shall be avoided. 8. /ai temporary fills shall be removed in their entirety. •u. ».. n \\ 11- rs % leu rnr;r:nr::y\%opVr°tj «c!:twe ;ri:uer.i::^o'roriu^^^^^^ of Others, nor do they authorixe interference with any existing or propooed federal pr j . .1. Hodlflcetlon. Su.o.n.lon or Revocet lon of M.tlonulde Pernltei Th. Chl.f of Enelne.r. ney nodlfy. euepend. or revok. n.tlonulde permit. In eccordenc. ulth the tel^ent A • nf CFR 325 7 Such authority include®, but is not limited toi adding individual, regional, or CO concerns for the aquatic environment as is the discretionary authority in section 33a?. . 8 1) Y The foUovitig OOHDITIOHS ouet bo folloucd in order tor the netlonvide perolte to be velid: 1. That any di.ch.rge of dredged or fill o.teriel vlll not occur In the proilnity ot e public water oupply incake; 2 That any discharge of dredged or fill material will not occur in arcaa of concentrated unlesl* the discharge ia directly related to a shellfish har/esting activity authorixed by paragraph (a)(M of this section: 3. That the activity will not jeopardize a threatened or endangered spoclea as Identified under the Er.dangercd Specie’s Act or destroy or adversely modify the critical habitat of such epeciea. <1. That the activity shall not significantly disrupt the oovenent of those apeclea of aquatic life indigenous to the waterbody (unless the primary purpose of the fill Is to impound water); 5. That any discharge of dredged or fill material shall consist of suitable material free from toxic pollu ­ tants In toxic amounts; 6. That any structure or fill authorized shall be properly malntainad. 7. That the activity will not occur in a component of the National Wild and Scenic River System; nor in a river officially designated by Congress os a "study river" for possible Inclusion In the system, while the river is in an official study status; 8. That the activity shall not cause on unacceptable Interference with navigation; 9 That If the activity may adversely affect historic properties which the National Park Service has listed on or ’determined eligible for Hating on the National Register of Historic Places, the permittee will notify the District Engineer. If the permittee encounters a historic property that haa not been Hated or determined eligible for Hating on the National Register, but which may be eligible for listing on the National Register, he/she will notify the District Engineer. 10. That the conatructlon or operation of the dCtlvlty will not Impair reserved tribal rights, including, but not limited to, reserved water rights and treaty fishing and hunting rights; U. That In certain states, an Individual state water quality certification must be obtained or waived; 12. That In certain states, an Individual state coastal zone management conalatoncy concurrence must be obtained or waived; 13. That the activity vlll comply with regional conditions which may have been added by the Division Engineer; H. That the management practices shall be followed to the maximum extent practicable. (See reverse side.) r" To:Jeanne Mabusthr Building & Zoning Administrator From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date January 14, 1991 Siibject: #1615 Gary Mroz & Kenneth Hopkins - Subdivision Septic Testing I have reviewed the soil testing information submitted and would make the following comments: 1.Lot 2, Block 1 has not been tested, and is intended to be served by City sewer from Ferndale Green. A stub is available. 2.Lot 1, Block 1 is split between the cities of Orono and Wayzata approximately 50/50. The preliminary plat drawing does not accurately show^ the tested and available primary and alternate drainfield sites. I have plotted these on Exhibit A, showing the primary and alternate drainfield sites in yellow, and the hilltop building envelope in blue. Schirmers reports that the area just to the east and northeast of the tested drarnfield sites contains fill material, hence the drainfield sites cannot be expanded to that relatively flat area. The building envelope southwest of the tested sites is on the high point of the property, and may well allow for a gravity flow trench system from a house developed on the top of the hill. This building envelope is roughly 80* by 140* average, bounded by 30' side setbacks on the west and northwest, by the drainfield sites on the east and northeast, and by the steep slope to the southeast. 4.System design was based on a 5 bedroom home, alternate site also can handle a 5 bedroom home. The Based on the above information. Lot 1, Block 1 appears to be capable of development using septic system and well. While it might be feasible to locate drainfield sites further west on the property, no such sites will be found further east, hence flexibility of house placement on this 2 acre lot is somewhat limited. Isv • .IT' i ! ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 19, 1990 REBERS CONSTRUCTION CONTINUED Kelley said. "We are being asked to review and vot“ on Council agrees with an abbreviated ^rocedu-e -- would not be necessary for Council to reviev; each o-^ the«so cases. Another alteration I would like to see in th!t proJeJs ?s what comparable area within the building envelcoe be reduced if *it®-nate back-up aprons are aooroved within the *5 setback area." '* ^front street Mabus^h stated that is already being done. plan £«*?ha“on;iderarL°s“'"'°"' inappropriate Cohen said, "I agree. However, the house is constructed Our purpose this evening is to vote on the Varian-'*^ and I have indicated to Hr. Pflaum t.tat 1 see no problem wit? "nls " It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Johnson, to recommend approve- of the turn-around and driveway conficurat'on for ‘’■"'OS 1 B* ,V that screens,-be pro" iied fromBellows askea if the motion couid be amended to * language stating t.nat this in no way sets a orecedent and that each property will be looked uoon individual'v-.n2n amended his motion to include Be^’-Z's s-atemtn-V"^ * - ^ seconded. Motion. Ayes-^. Kays-0. *?I’ot_-n carried? -o^-son. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 3 was moved bv Cohen second.^ w*» — "‘^%^®"PJ«"«nsivr. Plan i^n^enSLnt "ras oro?fo?eT?? Staff. Motion, Ayes-6. Nays-0. Motion carried. --=?°sec oy #1607 GARY MROZ - 65 FERNDALE GREEN SKETCH PLAN REVIEW displayed Mr. Mroz's s.ketch plan and reviewed his S”2Sber uf KiMael Saffron’s memo dated for dt one b^'acbre^d’^ia’ln'-o^tlit?"'"" Commission t.nat access ®*^^^®** that the property currently consists of thT-.® separate tax parcals which are all owned by t.^e clu lour«. Johnson said, "I would not be able to support this r rmnv Mabusth noted that it may not be necessary to grant lot - 19 - To:Planning Conunission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Proa: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Adminis January 16, 1991 #1616 Gary D. Mroz & Ken Hopkins, 59 Ferndale Green Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances * Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 - Conditional Use Permit required for land alterations involving the filling of wetland areas in excess of 100 cubic yards. The conditional use permit will also cover proposed berm being installed within the eastern boundaries of Lot 1 of the proposed Fairway Hills Addition plat. Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 - Variance is required for the filling of a designated wetland. Total Area of Wetland = 48,425 s.f. Pill will affect 16% or 7,900 s.f, of the wetland. 2,100 cubic yards of material will be placed within the wetlands. List Of Bxhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Application Mailing Certification Grading Plan Applicants' Engineer's Report Cook's Report Filter Fabric - Spec Sheet Hay/Straw Filter Barrier - Spec Sheet Review of Application - Application #1616 has been filed as a separate application, but is an integral part of the comprehensive review of the subdivision application #1615. This phase of the review deals with the access road (Outlot A) that is divided by a designated wetlands. To achieve access to the sites requires filling of a portion of the designated wetland. Lot 8 of the Alio Rae Terrace plat provides access to the public road, Ferndale Green. The property is owned by the Wayzata Country Club. Access cannot be achieved through the western or northern portions of the Country Club property. Zoning File #1616 January 16, 1991 Page 2 of 3 During the sketch plan review of the subdivision at your Hovember 19, 1990 meeting. Members advised the applicant that if ^|ie only variance sought by applicants was the encroachment of ^ \^the wetland, that they would have no problem in approving the V piMipoeed 2-lot plat. As already noted in the review of Appi^ation #1615, the current proposal does not require va^jtlmces to the standards of the RR-IB zoning district. The driveway is designed at a 14* width. The City Engineer has asked that 3* shoulders be installed on each side of the roadway for a 20* total width. Note to compensate for the filling, the drainage easement or conservation and flowage ease­ ment will be taken over 55,000 s.f. Cook feels the developers have provided adequate area to mitigate the encroachment. In preliminary discussions with Ron Quanbeck, storm water detention will not be required based on the assumed amount of impervious surfacing to be installed as a result of the 2 lot development. Two 18" culverts are proposed to be installed under the driveway to insure surface water flow is not restricted based on 100 year storm data. Applicants' engineer advises that if storm water detention is deemed necessary in the future, that there is adequate area on Lot 1 and Lot 2 for this purpose. It may be necessary to place some kind of restriction on these areas for some future date. We would ask for further comment by the City Engineer. Cook also concurs that there is no need for mitigation excavation at this time. The wetlands is classified as a Type 6 and Type 7, similar to the wetlands observed in the Alan Carlson subdivision off of Waterto%m Road. At three site inspections, staff was never able to find standing water in any area of the designated wetland. The wetland is not a DNR protected wetlands. The Corp of Engineers has been asked to review the proposal. As already noted in the subdivision application, the Corp will grant a national permit because the fill area shall be limited to 7,900 B«f* The Corp limits national permits to 10,000 s.f. The land alteration application has been filed with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Staff would like to take the opportunity to compliment Mr. An'^rson with his preparation of the materials for this review. Glenn Cook has recommended approval subject to the road being expanded to include the 3* shoulders on either side, and also recoBunends that the fire marshall review the road for access purposes. Staff would ask Mr. Anderson to provide more detail on the berming proposed within Lot 1. Mr. Hopkins has advised that the berm will be minimal in height as the installation of the house will involve the cutting into the bank. Planning Commission members should be aware that the fencing proposed along U.S. Highway 12 will be at a 3%* height and will meet the standards of the fence code. ■j.:' Zoning File #1616 January 16# 1991 Page 3 of 3 Options of Action - I. 2. Tabler pending receipt of more detailed information on the berming within Lot 1 and until the Planning Commission has acted on the preliminary subdivision application (#1615); or Approval. Planning Commission members may consider some of the following findings: A. There is no residential sites. other access to the proposed B. The wetlands is classified as a Type 6/7 wetlands and contains no standing water. C. The encroachment is deemed minimal by both the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the Corp of Army Engineers. D. The alteration of the wetlands will not involve the construction of ditching^ but flowage will be allowed to fan out over the grass-land area. E. The applicants have provided additional retention trea to mitigate the filling of the wetlands. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Construction of road cannot begin until applicants* representatives have provided a national permit from the Corp of Engineers and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. 2. Engineering plans for road to be amended to include 3* shoulders on either side. Fire chief to approve amended road plans. 3. Applicant to maintain erosion control throughout the entire project until ground cover is restored. Approval is based on the amendment of plans by Roger A. Anderson per recommendation of City Engineer# dated January 3» 1991 and entitled "Preliminary Plan - Drainage# Driveway and Erosion Control# Fairway Hills Addition", Zoning ile #1616 Februa: / 5» 1991 Page 4 ission Reconnendation ~Addlt: .*aal Coaaents and Planning C Addit:’onal Exhibit - ixhibit H - Roger A. Anderson's Letter dated 1/31/91 An inonediate neighbor of the subject property, Bill Moeller, (southeast) voiced concern with the potential drainage problem that could be sustained by his property because of the installation of the road. Moeller also questioned the maintenance of Outlet A and the eastern portions of Lot 2 as they impact the Alio Rae neighborhood. The applicants were advised that the maintenance of the outlet and that portion of Lot 2 that abuts the Alio Rae neighborhood would be maintained by both property owners* The property owner was advised that there are ordinance standards for the maintenance of yard areas but that the portions of the property located within the designated wetlands would sustain minimal maintenance and that the entrance portion to the property that was located out of the wetlands would be maintained. Staff has recommended that private covenants be drafted to include the maintenance of the dry buildable yard area along the eastern portions of the property. This matter was addressed during the review of the subdivision application. The drainage concerns were reviewed by the applicants' engineer# Roger A. Anderson. Mr. Anderson met with Mr. Moeller at the site. The drainage concerns can be alleviated by moving the road along the northern border of Oatlot A opening up the drainageway that flows to the west and removing any potential for backing up or blocking of drainage leaving neighbors' front yard. Please compare Exhibits Cl and C2. Exhibit Cl is^ the original grading and drainage plan submitted for the Planning Commission public hearing. Exhibit C2 is the amended plan showing the drive moved to the north side of Outlot A. Please review Exhibit H. Applicants’ engineer once again requests sewer and water to Lot 1. The letter goes^ on to note three conditions that should be required by the City if approved. If the sewer and water lines were to serve two residences, such lines would be subject to the City standards. Sewer and water lines would be o%med jointly up to the sanitary manhole and water shutoffs. Each individual would own the lines extending from the manhole and shutoffs. The covenants to be drafted for the subdivision application phase of the review would have to with the operation and maintenance of the joint lines and distinguish from the responsibility of each property owner for the individual service lines entering the property. The applicant will be asked to provide a written statement from the fire chief of Wayzata approving the road design and layout for emergency acces? purposes. Zoning Pile #1616 February 5, 1991 Page 5 Berning shown within Lot 1 will be no more than 3-3>j' in height as the future home owner will be cutting into an existing bank to construct house. The berm will provide an additional sound buffer to the noise of Highway 12 below. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission's unanimous recommendation. The resolution will formally be acted upon by the Council at the time of final plat approval. .( :■ A RBSOLDTIOM GRANTIHG A VARIAHCB TO MDHICIPAL lOaiHG CODE SBCTION 10.55* SOBDIVISIOM 8 AND GRANTING A CONDITIONAL OSB PBRMIT PER SECTION 10.03* SOBDIVISION 19 FILE #1616 WHEREAS* Gary D. Mroz and Kenneth R. Hopkins (hereinafter "the applicants") have an interest in the property located at 59 Ferndale Green within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as Outlet A, Lots 1 and 2, Block 1* Fairway Hills Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property")? and NHBRBA8* the applicants have made application to the City of Orono to permit the installation of an access drive and sewer and water lines within a designated wetland where no land alterations are permited per Section 10*55# Subdivision 8; and per Section 10.03* Subdivision 19 requests a conditional use permit for the installation of these improvements that involve land alterations in excess of 100 cubic yards. ION* THEREFORE* BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono* Minnesota: FINDINGS 1, This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1616 2, The property is located in the RR-lB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring 2 acres of dry continguous lands within each lot. 3. The property is approximately 6 acres in area. 4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on January 22* 1991 and recommended approval of the proposed variances and conditional use permit, based on the following findings: A) There is no other access to the proposed residential sites except through a land corridor that is intersected by a designated wetland area. B) The wetlands is classified as a Type 6/7 wetlands and contains no standing water. Page 1 of 5 C) The encroachment is deemed minimal by both the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the Corp of Army Engineers. The Corp has granted a national permit because the land alteration will encroach less than 10^000 s.f. of the wetland. The fill will affect 16% or 7,900 s.f. of the total wetland area. D) The alteration of the wetlands will not involve the constructxon of ditching, but flowage will be allowed to fan out over the grass land areas. E) The applicants have provided a minimal amount of additional retention area to mitigate the filling of the wetlands. Both the City of Orono and the M.C.W.D. will nor ask for additional retention area to mitigate the filling for road construction within the wetlands. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do rot apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of th applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the installation of a driveway will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 5 I COMCLOSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.55, Subdivision 8 to allow ling and grading activities within a wetlands defined as a 5/7 wetlands? and grants a conditional use permit for .rig and grading activities in excess of 100 cubic yards per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19. This approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Construction of road cannot begin until the Mi* laha Creek Watershed District has issued a permit ai -xty Engineer has approved final road construction pla .o and sewer and water plans. 2. Sewer and water lines and the shared drive must be all located within Out lot A and shall be installed with minimal impact upon the designated wetland. 3. Applicants to provide written statement from Wayrata Fire Chief confirming road design and layout will meet emergency access needs. 4. Applicants to maintain erosion control throughout the entire project until ground cover is restored. Approval is based on the plans by Roger A. Anderson of Roger A. Anderson and Associates entitled "Preliminary Pxan - Drainage, Driveway, and Erosion Control" Fairwa*. Hills Addition, dated January 3, 1991, revised February 1, *1991. 5. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit for the retaining walls within one year of the date of Council approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (________________________^)* 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 3 of 5 f rr I 7. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby aaree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this day of ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) > SS. COTjNTY op HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of _ _ _ __» by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hailing Mayor & City clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instr\iment was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 B cm OF OROHO - GBHERAL LAUD OSB APPLICAT^H — FBOFBRTT LOCATION 77* , A Sit. Address Prop^r^y Identification Number (P.I.D.). • .'MUItW C V"" " ,V‘l . sV *ViZ.1Pipage attach le9al description to application if not included on required survey. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (home) y73 _ _ _ _IPhone fwork) ^C-01 APPLIGANT /dy-V€< Nano “■'* .-A e. k V a v¥ -r "-S* v*eW ► riA# • Tf f -4"gk ; X .4 * Wt* ,A-*/ i* Address nyi^ ^ ^ ^ City zip«£22lZ (if different than applicant) W Name _ _ _ Address ;?a(Ro Phone (home)_ ^'7 j S- Ci'2.S^ Phone_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ City Zi^_^2^2L Date Proper5x_^quired __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _,- - imonrn I (do) tdo notT^elso own the adjacent parcels or land. (month/year) yns - CONDITIONAL USB PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Pee - Double Current Application Fee $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential acces. ^ry Use $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apaitmexits $150.00 Duplex Cr«dit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Of isreshor. PRO/PID - see fee schedule C AFFLICAnOliS 1’$200.00 $250.00 Sc ‘ $175.00 $ 50.00 $250.00 \$100.00 Other - -V ■ SI.iL __________________________________________________________________________________________________ Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Basement Vacation with Subdivision Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Appeals !BHT DSB OP PROPERTY p ^ p Present Zoning District A ^ i Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) CRIPTIOM OP RBQUBST Describe request in detail: c co^ > 1,^1 1U fA/ JiD SOBMITTM^ 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350* (you can obtain this list front Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map. 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). 6. Construction plan^ if applicable (see staff for requirements). 7. As an addendum to this application^ please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. TOO ARB RBQOnSD TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGB OOCUNBNTS OR___ [IMG COPY (11” X 17* OR SMALLER) POR ALL DOCUMBRTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remesUber that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff: Date_______________ 'V »•amiCAHT'S 8II The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administratorr agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred* in review of this applicatioUf and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her Icnowledge. A^lioant's signature oest 0£ nis/ne Date /Z /s9-ht 8I0HATURB The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorised reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents# commissiun members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and vei^ifica^tioii} of this request. Owner's signature Lun ve^ri Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled saview meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is aa^le to attend a scheduled meeting, please SMke arrangements to have an authorised agent attend in your place and advise the Building 4 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. f.-- -1: r 'r ',^1* r-'. .' «.- ' H'n ■\ ■f- CBRTIFICATB OP lAILIliG STATE OP MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OP ORONO ) 8S. I, Linda Vee» of the City of OronOf Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1616, was mailed to the attached list of property owners. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 2nd day of January, 1991. ■iillblM r I r:i Roger A. Anderson & Associates, Incij',^^ Civil Engineering Consultants Suite 107. 7415 Wayzata Blvd. Minneapolis. MN 55426 (612) 546-7035 CTf C r <«M0 J • ^ 4 t January 3, 1991 City of Plaaninq Dept. Box 66 C^rystal Bay, Ml 55323 4-i // Attn: Jeai Mabusth Re: Preliminary Plat Fairway Hills Add. Orcxio/Wayzata, Ml Ccmn. No. 9057 Gentl This latter report is to provide informaticn regarding the preliminary plat of Fairway Hills Addition. Site Oonditiona the site is an irregularly shaped parcel of 6.2 acres located in the northwest quadrant of Ferndale Road and IH 12. The majority of the site is in the City of Orcno and the remainder (about 5%) is in the City of Wayzata. The westerly boundary is adjacent to the Wayzata Country Club. Aooass to the site is from an existing curb and gutter cul>de-sac street, Femdale Green. City sewer and water are available. A site plan of the site is attaidied to this letter for your reference Drainage. Topography, and wetlands About 1.1 acres of the site is a City designated wetland. The wetland was visually classified by the City as a oonbinaticn Type 6 ( shrubs, farurii, intermittent surface »«ter) and Type 7 (bruid) and trees). There is a high laob on the south side of the property which rises 40* the wetland. Bite drainage is ganerally from southeast to northwest. Gn the wetland area are flat. There is a 51** span ardi pipe under TH 12 just NMt of fhmdale which drains across an adjaoant property and into the site. An 18" OP culvert channels the runoff wasterly irder two golf coume fairways. Ultimate diqx»al of this water is south to Lake Minnetonka via an open ditch. Mo erosicn or flooding probL nhearved at the time of the survey. Drainage jurisdiction lies with the Minnetonka CTe^ Watershed District, the City of Qrono, and the City of Wayzata. tend Oeve/opmeitt • Municipal • Highway Rallroada V t,::. D January 3, 1991 Fairway Hills Add. Page 2 of 3 Soils on the site are predominantly Heyder and Burnsville sandy loans per the Soil Conservation Service m^ss- The low areas are shown as peat/muck. Proposed Plat- Driveway and Development The preliminary plat shows two buildable lots of 3.2 and 2.0 acres, and an 1.0 acre outlet for driveway and utility access. Preparing the lots as buildable sites will require the construction of an 800 foot driveway, part of whicii will be across the existing wetland. The plans show a 14* wide bituminous driveway with 3:1 side slopes and a maximum grade of 7%. Preliminary alignment is indicated on the plans, with final location and grade to be determined in the field to allow saving of trees, balance of earthwork, and minor adjustments in drainage. Driveway grade and location is also restricted by the need for culverts to maintain drainage, and the elevation of the sanitary sewer. Depending on hcxise design, some site grading may be required at the building locations. Sewer and water will be extended from the existing city mains for the nearest house. The remaining houee is proposed to have a private well and drainfield, althou^ it may be desirable to also 'ide sewer and water to this house. Drainage and Watershed Considerations 1. Wetland filling The driveway fill would cover about 7900 SF of the existing wetland. The maximum height of fill would be about 6 feet, ^ it would require 2100 cubic yards of material within the wetland limits to construct the roadway. In addition, it will be necessary to remove some of the peat under the proposed driveway to obtain a sound roadbed. There is a total area of 48,425 SF of wetland on the site. The proposed fill would affect approximately 16% of this area. The area north of the existing wetland is at or near the elevation of the wetland. As a part of the plat, the oMier prapamm to place this area of about 55,000 SF into a pemtanent aasemant for drainage purposes, •diich will preserve its ability to filter and retain runoff. 2. Erosion Gontrol The plans show erosion control items to be utilized during construction, including silt feoos, ditdi bale cheedts, and turf establishment. These will be installed and maintained per the Watershed guidelines. Typical details for silt fence and ditcdi bale checks are attafdwd. January 3, 1991 FairHay Hills Add. Pags 3 of 3 /) 3. Surface Drainage airfaos Mater floe through the site appears to be intennittent. There is no clear established drainageNay through part of the wetland. Pasf»d cn the high eater infonnatiGn provided by the MCX7T TH 12 plans, we have ooepitted expected floes from a 100 year storm to be 19 cfs, and have provided teo 18” culverts under the driveway to accommodate this water. We suggest that these culverts be placed at a relatively flat grade and at an elevation which will pass the 100 year storm without an increase in hi^ water elevation. We also suggest that, to maintain the r-haract«»r of the wetland, no pacific channel be constructed connecting the existing culverts. Some annual maintenarce of this culvert may be required. 4. Storawater Detention The re^ilations of the watershed require on-site stormwater detention •dwre runoff flcwe are altered. Construction of two houses and the driveway ixxild cover about .55 acre with impervious surfacing or 9% of ths sits. In our preliminary conversations with Nr Ron Quanbeck from the Mstsrshsd, he indicated on-site detention may not be required for this devslopment. If it is determined that stomwater detention is southeast of the driveway in Lot 1 and north of the house be adequate for this purpose. SuDBiftry , the in Lot 2 would 8; This information is provided to assist the City in their review of the P<^joct. Qir primary focus was for the drainage/wetlaxxl considerations, taut we have also included a preliminary design for driveway and utility In cur opinion, the inprovements shorn will meet the requirements of the City end Mitershed regarding site drainage and wetland encroachment. ocntect me if you have any questions regarding this letter. Rogir A. Anderson, P.E. i. xns Lot Surveys 1/1 SonestroQ Rosene Anderlik & |\j| Associates Ingfrim A Arcfiitects ftorfu^mrnm 'jn n •Aj*er . la^Ai# •! ^4n *> »f Cy»«^ i> CS2i •HP^ O •€ Vi ISffvA C *A vt- A SP«8n H Km ^z»i4t hi^iism A H \un A •! •f-i < •/c^je* • ?5wr»AAA. »| »ew« »t^ •! ::^ c tadtRCM. n w Anew Af v^e^At C •! 9 MiJ-C •! A *-«W •!C Km. A. A A^n UrKm,^ ie;c^ H A St« f g »f VAAP MrtAft ei VJ^ 9 At >Oi^lM A-etw A . A 9*> A fy^ACP n VhMt 4V^ #1 QflMP fH •! •A^C AiA V«tM IbAf 4iCA ^ C ^nocf» •! te«'p Cvet et • C>?»ewR •• S*> vicnp^ eg C-erfi « fnCRSfiA ^ M -jri«i \1 ClOA January 14, 1991 City t»f Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Attn; Jeunne Mabusth I Re: Fainaay Hills Oronot Minnesota Our File Na 139-1615 I>ear Jeanne: We haw reviewed the preliminary plan submitted on the Fairway Hills Addition. This *tibdivision contains two lots with (wie of the lots to be connected to the cities sanitary sewer and water ^tem and the other lot would be construaed with a well and on-site system. Access to the property will be through a wetland area and filling to construct the driveway will be required. ^ ITw driveway is proposed to be constructed with a 14 foot wide surface. We would recommend ^0“*der be placed on each side of the pavement for a 20 foot toul width. This should be reviewed with the fire chief for emergency access. The roadway will encroach cm the weiM are& The developer has provided the City with an adequate area to mitigate the encroachment. We do not feel that mitigation excavation would be necessary at this time The plan should be approved by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed. Wc would recommend that both lots be connected to the sanitary sewer and water systems. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK A ASSOCIATES, INC r. r [I-m.. Glenn R. Cook CR(':dh 3SJS UMrst HIjpiway 36 • St. Paul. Mlfwiesota 5Stl3 • 617 036 4600 Trench Document 02-03-0-1 Section: Slope Protection Subject: Silt Fence Fii;er Barriisr ♦ # V ; A trench must be excavated approximately 6 inches wide and 6 inches deep along the line of posts and upslope from the barrier. The trench must be backfilled and the soil compacted over the filter fabric. The following illustration shows the construction of a silt fence filter barrier. : SetDcstsaroexcavaTe 3 6* ov 6-n trercn ucscoe ♦rom ana aiorg :re of oosts Z wtr«»erc rg*o OOStS. 1 Atttcn tht fitter •aofx to wife fence arc exierc n >mo tne trencn. on anocomcacTtnt e«c3waiec son 11 p.itef *acnc —• |V| ■ Jll ilil Source: MnOOT Illustration: Silt Fence Barrier Date 4/89 Page 2 of 4 pi- S -•V . ' •• ^ -. • * - m* 0^ k.lt Subiec:: Hay/Siraw FMtcr Bame: • f '9 * »- £9 S Z P'ace ano stane saraw Dates 4 Sacxfiil aro ccrroact eicavatec soi Soiact: Aoapr ^ from imtUttonolSeaw ano Faonc Rlr iffitorSidimtniConeoC ShiTMOd and Wyan Staking Illustration: Hay/Siraw Filter Barrier Each bale must be securely anchored by at least two stakes driven through die bale. The first stake in each bale must be driven toward the previously laid bale to force the bales together. Oau Pagt 4/89 2 of 3 6^ ____________ / / Roger A. Anderson & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineering Consultants Suite 107. 7415 Wayzata Blvd. Minneapolis. MN 55426 (612) 546-7035 January 31, 1991 City of Planning Oapt. Bqk 66 Oryatal Bay, 55323 ■ ■ . ;■ . , Attn: Joanne Mafcusth .FEB 4 1991 Re: Preliminary Plat Fairway Hills Add Orooo/Wayzata, Conn. No. 9C57 14 • Gentlanen: this latter report is to provide additional information regarding the preliminary plat of Faiz>«ay Hills Addition for your discussion at the City Council meeting.. the folloNing items were reviewed, as requested: 1. Drainage from the property to the southeast of the driveway. I net with Nr. Bill Mueller who asms the home on Femdale Green eoutbeast of the proposed driveway access. His concern was that the new drive could restrict the drainage of his property. After field review, it was determined that moving the proposed drive as far north as poesible on the out lot would allow for an adequate drainageway for his property. The enclosed plan has been modified to reflect this change. 2. Sanitary Sewer and Water Service The original proposal provided for sanitary sewer and water service to the first lot, with septic tank, drainfield, and well to serve the eeeofid lot. It was reqiiested by the developer at the Planning Oomnissicn meeting that the City consider providing City sewer and water to both lota. This is in keeping with the general oonaansus that, ttere available, it is in the best interest of the community to utilize the public services. The City Engineer also recomaanded that both homae have public utilities. Umd Oevelopment * Munlelpml • HIghwtyg • Rmtlr.imda I/ ' January 31, 1991 Faimay Hills Add. Page 2 of 3 Iha Planning Conmission did not act on the request for public utilities, apparently feeling that this decision Mould be best left to the City Obuncil. Ue Mould, therefore, restate our request that public utilities both lots, with the following conditions: a. Ihe sewer and water lines would be constructed to City Standards. b. The lines would be jointly owned by the two lot owners to a point near the first home where a sanitary manhole and water shutoffs would be located. Private individual services would then be extended to each hoae. c. Covenants would be provided for the operation 2uid maintenance of the joint lines. contact me if you have any questions regarding this letter. Roger A. Anderson, P.E. Attaidanents oc: Kan Hopkins Gary Mroz Lot Survefys . ^ To: Date: 11 f QMayor Petersion & Orono Council *.eml)ers City Administrator BernhardsonJeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator February 7, 1991 Subject: Maureen S. Bellows, 265 Brown Read Scut'. - Resolution Please review the enclosed correspondenc- fmr Ms. Bellows and the legal counsel for owner of Lot 1, B.tipld. Staff has dtafted another resolution amending a previous '^ouncil action. It would appear that this would be the most expedient way to respond to the concerns of Mr. Pihlstrom. Note the resolution has included the necessary findings for the rescinding of the original condition in Resolution #2877. - -5 A RESOLOTION AMENDING RESOLUTION #2877 TEAT AMENDED CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF THE BYFIBLD PLAT FILE 1998 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly/ economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, on April 28, 1906 the City Council granted final plat approval of a two-lot subdivision application of Maureen S. Bellows for a plat known as the Byfield plat; and WHEREAS, on September 24, 1990 the City Council approved Resolution #2877 that agreed to amend an original condition of plat approval that would now allow separate accesses to Lots 1 and 2, Byfield via County Road 146; and WHEREAS, a condition of Resolution #2877 required the owner ; Lot 2 to obtain a land alteration permit and provide a grading plan to the City for the purpose of upgrading the existing access to ensure safe use of the access; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered the written comments of a repres#»ntative of the owner of Lot 1, Byfield and the written comments of the owner of Lot 2, Byfield and the following findings of fact set forth by the Orono staff: 1. On September 24, 1990, the Orono Building and Zoning Administrator and City Engineer met at the site to review and determine what type of land alterations would be required of the op 1 leant. It waj the opinion of staff that because of the ^ '"itation in space between the curb cut at County Road 146 -.id backout apron adjacent to garage, that filling or ra;. ^ entrance was impractical. If plantings are maintained v - or below 3* height within area bounded by •’♦’ility pole and traveled road there would be adequate sighting distance at a 40 mile per hour speed. Page 1 of 2 1 2, In October of 1990, the Public Works Director was asked to meet with the owner of Lot 2 to reconfirm the findings of the City Engineer. In a letter dated November 26, 1990, the Public Works Director confirmed the findings of the City Engineer. 3. The owner of Lot 2 was advised to maintain vegetation or plantings at the recommended 3' height within the specified area and that land alterations would not be required within the access area. NOW, TBBREFORB, BB IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves an ^unendment of Resolution #2877 that approved an amendment of an original condition of final plat approval that would allow single/separate accesses to Lots 1 and 2, Byfield, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and hereby rescinds the condition of that resolution that would require the owner of Lot 2, Maureen Steele Bellows, to obtain a land alteration permit and provide a grading plan for alteration of the existing access th^t serves Lot 2. Adopted by the Orono City Council of the City of Orono on this 11th day of February, 1991. ATTEST: p Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor STATE OP MINNESOTA ) )S3. COUNTY OP HP.Nr<EPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 11th day of February, 1991, by Barbara A, Peterson & Dorothy N. Hallin, Mayor 6 City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 2 of 2 ; IX: ifiL, r 1^ INNOVATIVE MICROGRAPHICS DUE TO THE POOR CONDITION OF THE PRECEEDING DOCUMENT WE CANNOT PRODUCE AN ACCEPTABLE MICROFILM IMAGE. CFS CE.NTRAL RNANCIAL SERVICES. INC. ?BekxiP!L. amodor 1 TTie Colonnade 5500 Wayzata Boulevard Suite 950 Golden Valley. MN 55416 : (6i:i 542-3001 "20 Goodlette Road Suite 201 Napiev. R, 33^40 i813i 263-S53t> RESPOND TO MINNESOTA January 28, 1991 N. Walter Graff, Attorney at Law Best & Flanagan 3500 IDS Center Minneapolis, MJI 55402 RE:Maureen Bellows and Block 1, Byfield Lot 1, Block 1, By field and Lot 2, Dear Mr. Graff: As you will recall, I an general counsel to John Morrison with respect to the above natter. Mr. Morrison recently entered into an agreement with Maureen Bellows respecting the property described above. As part of that agreement, Mr. Morrison was deeded Lot 1, Block 1, Byfield, Hennepin County, Minnesota and Ms. Bellows continues to own Lot 2. Originally under city of Orono Resolution #1985, the city council approved the final plat for a two lot subdivision for these two particular lots. That particular resolution provided that these two lots have a shared driveway access and was a condition to the split of the parcel into two lots. At the time of the agreement between Maureen Bellows and John Morrison, the parties decided that it would be in everyone's best interest to have a separate access at County Read 14 6 for each of these two particular lots. That, of course, necessitated an amendment to Resolution #1985 from the City of Orono. The City of Orono issued Resolution 22877 (copy enclosed) which amended Resolution 11985 and allowed for two separate accesses for Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 1, Byfield, subject to certain terms and conditions. As you can see from the enclosed Resolution #2877, this required the owner of Lot 2 (Maureen Bellows) to obtain a land alteration permit for the purpose of upgrading the existing access to Lot 2, as well as providing a fillir., and grading plan to be approved by the city engineer. The access improvements were to be completed by December 1, 1990. Maureen Bellows did not apply for or obtain a land alteration permit nor did she provide a filling and grading plan to be 1.. r k approved by the city engineer. Instead, she went to t.he public works director, John R. Gerhardson, who reviewed the site in person and provided to Ms. Bellows a letter dated November 26, 199 0 (a copy of which is enclosed). As you can see, it appears that the public works director determined that additional falling or raising of the existing driveway at Lot 2 would not be practical because of limitations and space. This letter does not, however, constitute a resolution of the city council of Orono which would allow for two separate driveway accesses to County Road 14 6 for Lots 1 contemplated by both Ms. Bellows and John Morrison. and 2 Would you please consider assisting Ms. Bellows in obtaining another City of Orono resolution further amending Resolution ^1985 which eliminates the first three sentences of section 1, page 2, of Resolution #2877? It would then be clear that the owner of Lot 1 will be entitled to receive a separate driveway access to County Road #146 so long as the owner of Lot 2 maintains all shrubs at three feet height or less within an area located between the traveled road and the utility pole, and the future owner and developer of Lot 1 obtains an access permit from t.he Hennepin Department of Transportation prior to application for a building permit for new residential construction on Lot 1. Unfortunately, I do not believe Ms. Bellows understands the legal necessity to receive such a resolution in order to ensure that the owners of Lot 1 and Lot 2 will, in fact, be able to receive a separate driveway access to each lot. It is my opinion that as things stand now, Ms. Bellows has not complied with Resolution #2877 making it impossible to get a permit for a separate driveway for Lot 1. In addition, I would like to be kept advised as to any progress you make in obtaining from the City of Orono an additional amendment to Resolution #1985 clarifying this matter. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call me. Very t.-uly yours. Gary D.^Pihlstrom General Counsel GOP/wls Enclosures xc*Maureen Bellows John Morrison Jan eraser mrmm A I r * '* r r:rr>rI 'I^QRONa City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.23'77 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION *1985 THAT GRANTED PINAL APPROVAL CP THE BTFIELD PLAT PILE 1998 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State? of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, on April 28, 1986 the City Council granted final plat approval of a two-lot subdivision application of Maureen S. Bellows (hereinafter the "subdivider") for a plat known as the Byfield plat; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered a request of the subdivider that would seek to amend a condition of plat approval that would require a shared dri-eway access for Let 1 and Lot 2, Byfield and has asked for separate accesses at County Road 146; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered the written comments of the Hennepin County Department of Transportation and the written and oral comments of staff and noting the following findings: 1. The Byfield plat provided 509 lineal feet of frontage along County Road 146. Lots 1 and 2, Byfield satisfied the required lot width to the rear of the front yard setback area at 200'*»' each. 2. The Byfield plat did not require variances to the standards of the RR-IB, rural residential zoning district. 3. There is already an existing driveway access appi^'ved by Hennepin County that serves Let 2. 4, There is adequate sighting distance based on the 40 MPH allowed speed for Coun.y Road 146 to provide safe access to Lot 1. NOW, THBKBPORE, BE IT RESOLVED that thy City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves an amendment o* ‘ esolution #1985 that granted approval of the Byfield plat that would allow single/separate accesses to Lots 1 and 2, Byfield, Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to the following conditions^ Page 1 of 2 ; f ! [ » ik- OHCJNU city of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL KIM ?U~"7 h* ■ 1. Owner of Lot 2 shall obtain a land alteration permit for the purpose of upgrading the existing access to Lot 2 (265 Brown Road South). Upon application for the land alteration permit, owner shall provide a filling and grading plan to be approved by the City Engineer. Such access improvements to be completed by December 1, 1990. In addition, the owner is asked to maintain all shrubs at a 3* height or less within an area located between the traveled road and the utility poles. 2. Future owner and developer of Lot 1 shall obtain an access permit from the Hennepin County Department of Transportation prior to application for a building permit for new residential construction. Adopted by the Orono City Council of the City of Orono on this 24th day of September, 1990. Hallin, City Clerk^:::^^^R. Grabek, STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 24th day of September, 1990, by James R. Grabek & Dorothy M. Rallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota sninicipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. TMenesA l. naab NOTAAV (MJ8UC • MlN^:30rA HENNEPIN COUNTY 1% tamnmun «ipiM Page 2 of 2 r I F-' i r ki ^Lr.* ^ i ai>r.. I (IF~ ^TOPK5 CITY of OKONO Post Office Box rxi»Orystat Bay. .Minnesota S5323• Municoai Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka Novenber 26f 1990 Maur««n Bellows 265 Brown Road South Long Lake, MN 55356 Dear Ms* Bellows: Per Council's direction. I have met with you site in order to determine a need for additional improvements to the existing access for the purpose of increasing or improving the level of safety in the use of your access drive. As I advised at the site, additional filling or raising^ the existing drive would not be practical because of w.ne limitations in space, but found that the existing vegetation had b«n at t.*,* access tc acccmmodate t.te required sighting at 40 MPH speed. Please contact my office if you have any furt.her questions concerning this matter. Sincerely, /u John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director JRG/tln mnUNNG a 20eMNG 473*73J7 amoiinc AOMINISTIUnON k FINANCE - 473-735*PUBLIC WOWCS - 473-715* i- \ t r I?*'- pV: & m Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Ono G 8on«r*Dc ®£ ffoc^r* X ?osere josec*' C Wjrwtr . jc-***J ^5 ^-cr^no 6 G;#rin ff C-c» '^orrji £ '.c,ei ►£ Ccx:er G **£ gngin—fs 4 Architects January 24, 1991 w*' A Go^do^ ^£ 8<refO Ji/ Oof^skJ C Surq^fOt «»£ 4 30u?t5Cr*. »£ Va^« * -inicr i’E ’-d « P ?<3 **€ M<r>^ ■ -Ijuti^enr ffooen 8 **£ D^v<3 C wCs«o?a ^E X '^rw' -£ Mcnjfi C Lv^* PS .i"'**’ ^ '.‘aa'V! p Anoe<^r> P£ a atyfs PE ?ooen C ?usse« a a £ Aryjvjl P£ -•cwa^ 4 $^rfrjrj J>£ Gjrj Ecgercn Pi Mar« A seia PE - CasweP PE v"ae< V«ark D Waiiis P£ •non»ai 8 A Zi^, ^ V 8 «»E - ^-'ho i PE 9^^ C P^>.'^aa 4 I A 4^ei M * C P L- ^£ Cecs<3 Cjvief PE Pooe^ 9 Qf^w PE Garv X VV:ren p£ 4 Leo M PjM«>V(y Hjftjn M C^jon City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attention: Mr. John Gerhardson Re:Orono L.S. No. 8 Our File No 13945 Dear Mr. Gerhardson: Enclosed is the Final Pay Request for Orono Lift Staruin No. S. This project has been completed by Northwest Mechanical Inc. according to the project plans and specifications. We recommend the City accept this project at this time and pay the contractor the final amount due. The Minnesota Department of Revenue Forms IC-134 are being processed by Northwest Mechanical for this project. Paul Ogland will be delivering these forms directly to the City. If you have any questions about this project please call. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK & .ASSOCLXTES, INC. Daryl Kirschenman DK:lk Enclosure 13945/cor 2318 Wttt Highwa y 34 • $t. Paul, Mlnnasota SSII3 • 612-434-4600 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT 1/fft A b 1 PLACE: •JSIIViaLj €m J % Orono, Minnesota PROJECT:Lift Station No. 8 Renovation PROJECT NO.:FILE NO.:13945 rOMTRACTOR;Northwest Mechanical. Inc. ADDRESS:432 Mill Street. PO Box 40 Lona Lake. MN 55356 FOR PERIOD: From: Dec. 22, 1990 To; Jan. 22. 1991 SPECIFIED CONTRACT COMPLtTION DATE: October 01, 1990 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.t i FINAL SUMMARY: 1. Original Contract Amount Change Order • ADDITION Change Order - DEDUCTION Reviled Contract Amount Value Completed to Date Material on Hand Amount Earned Leia Retainage 0 Z Sub-Total 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. a. a. 10. 11. Leas Amount Paid Previously AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.; 4 & F S $ $ $ S $ $ $ Recommended fot Approval by: BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 4 ASSOCIATES. INC. By A // QVNER APPROVAL: ■f_ _ _ _ _ _ »y_ _ _ _ _ _ 48.000.00 48.000.00 48.000.00 0.00 48.000.00 0.00 48.000.00 45.600.00 2.400.00 Date:Approved By; NORTHWEST MECHANICAL. INC. Contractor Bv:Apnroval stated on attached AIA form 13945PR APPLIC A/A DOCUMINT C702 P^Cf csf f'f 2 P'C!S rp tO^n^f)City of Orono 1335 Brown Road Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 PROIECT Lift Station Renovation No. 8 APPiicAfiON so 3 Final PiRion fRo*'T 11/28,'90 12/19/90 f'lM- milion If ; OWNER I -vRCHlTfCT 1 CONTRACTOR * ATTENTION CONTRACT FOR Northwest Mechanical />32 Mi 11 Street, Box ! nnq I;»kp, MN Inc. 40 architects PkOlfC T so contract DAT! f CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Eh ANCC OltOIll SUMMARV ' Application i< made for Paxmeni a? fiHown below, in connection with the Contract. Continuation Sheet, AIA Document G/03. i« attached in ru#n|h« b% 0%*. *Wf lOTAl xi'niiiON I 't ! ^ t M The present status ot tHf account ior this Contract »s as follows ORfGlhAl CONTRACT SUM t. — Apprit\c*fi ln*r Month | Ntiinbe*Dale Approved i • 1 1 1 totals N«t cl««nRC bv Ch«nf« O»0*f \e! c.-.mcr b\ Change Orders CONTRACT SUM TO DAT! TOTAL COMPIFTID & STORED TO DATE •Column C on C"i>V RETAINAGE------------% or total in Column l on C‘OT TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE The undtnignetf Contractor cemne* that i** t^' m**; and br-litf the vo\cH*d h\ m h» kne i«\ application io» 'yiffiffii has been i >^npleted m »H,mci u ih ih* Coni ran Doti Jtnt^ that all amcNinti Ka^t be* i bv him u»r Wo-k whic*> rertititaie^ tor Pasment i issued and p.r. mmt* o cmrc' t«om the CKvne*. and that current pasment »no\\n hf n nm^ ciut tot: NOKTHUEST MECHANICAL INC. c 48.000.00 c 00 A 48.000.00 C 48.000.00 c 00 . . . . S 48,000.00 T ............$43,700.00 CURRENT PAYMENT DUE A.300.00 (•niTT ■jTTtrr n State of Subscribed and sworn to before me this Notarv Public M\ Commission expires Countv of dav of AROimECrS aRTIRCATE K)R PAYMENT AAtOUNT CERTIFIED •n acfotdance %%rfh the Contract OcKumem* baser on aim %ainoo and the data coatfmfifif the aho\f applicaiKm tK* Art»Htrr fOftaif to thf Owner that the Worl K«t profte«NP*d i*- ifn et hii linov\lrdfe iniormalio'' and t>rUr» it *n acccMdance mth tiu Contract Dciru ____ifU Ml M C«Mi«CM>r i» eniilkd »o p«rn«ni ot ih« *>mOun T oniriKi. ' Atijc*" eAp.',n,i(on ii amot/oi cfti I'fa •iC'T ’ trnou'it ARCHITECT B n ------1Itttt rrfi>iii-l^l --------------------- Da»f Thu Certilicaic u not nepotiabt* Th« AMOUNT CERTiMfp i* p*vab<« onK to th» c. •'••tc- • named Kerem tisuanct payment and accepiarKe of payment are without prefuc cs u* #n\ rifbn of the Owner or Comrattor larsder Ihif Con ki • iiWMUftOhtRNDCIRftNCAll TOR PAYQ<^t • apin fTiipffN^ • aitA • » Uti ,Sv g;. K- feS ■* t : r; F ';: v;' ■ r^' ORONO LIPT STATION CONTINUATION SHEET • 2 ' ■ 2 "'*^ ■• AIA Docomrnt C702, APPUCATlOK' AKD CFRTIFICATt FOR PAYMENT, con.amme Contracior * Signed CeniF'cation is attached In tabulations belosv. amounts are stated tc> the nearest dollar Use Column I on Contracts where variable reiamage for Ime items ma\ apph AIA DOCUML\T C703 (instructions on rexetse side! appucmion NUMBER ^3 findl application date December 19, 1990 PERIOD TO architect S PROIECT NO 1 item KO. 1. 2. 3. 4. s. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. B r DESCRIPTION Of nORtt Bond 4 Insurance Byoass Too slab Demolition Grout Bottom t’lisc. Metals Pumps Piping Painting Site work- grading bituminous trees fence restoration Electrical SCHEOUlEO \AIUE 2.500.00 2.000.00 4.500.00 1,000.00 1.000.00 2,000.00 22,000.00 5.200.00 300.00 4.400.00 3,000.00 48,000.00 \\ORK CCl^'‘’l^{D (ROM PK(\’I0L'S : IHIS FfRlOD APPlICAtlON 1 (D-E) 2.500.00 2,000.00 4.600.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 2,000.00 22,000.00 5.200.00 300.00 4.400.00 1,000.00 46.000.00 f MATERlSlS PRE^ESTl' STORED (N'OT is D OR E' 2,000.00 2.000.00 c TOTAL CONtPlETED ASD STORED TO DSTI iD- E - F' Af cmWCI *Ot ieiyMit<t»>»» SW WWWQx * *IA* * < siW 2.500.00 2,000.00 4.600.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 2,000.00 22,000.00 5.200.00 300.00 4.400.00 3,000.00 48,000.00 ic - o 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 balance to FINISH tl - Cl -0- -0- -0 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- RE*- saCE PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS CITY: PROJECT! FILE NO.I CONTRACTORi Orono, Minnesota Lift Station No. 8 Ppnnvation 13945 Northwest Mechanical. Inc. OtICIMAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $40,000.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS $0.00 REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT $40,000.00 DATE NO.CHANCE ORDER DESCRIPTION AHOUNT I: I 1 2 3 TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS > ADD rtOJSCT FA JbJU SUMMARY! t.ilvl B2i. TOTAL FATWMT TO DATE ■fTAlMAOt FOR FAYMBHT NO TOTAL TALOI COHFLSTED 4 6 F $48,000.00 0.00 $48,000.00 ISfASFR li'- $0.00 PERIOD OSB JO PAYMENT THIS VOUCHER VALUE COMPLETED RETAINACE Start 10-24-90 $9,044.00 $9,520.00 $476.00 10>24.f0 11-28-90 34,656.00 46,000.00 2,300.00 11-28.90 12-21-90 1.900.00 48,000.00 2.400.00 12-22-90 1-22-91 2.400.00 48,000.00 0.00 L>..A. A.. Bonestroo Rdsene Anderlfk & Associates '.*•0 G Bo''*vf*oo ^5 X 'f Vrf'. - . £ • » - - • • ":c« *- i •.-.f\ *•? j n '■ • ' tr^'' ’f »'• A T<^4Q C 9^J^rJT .?'% •* flourac'' *.'4 • ^ -i'-VC" '£ •p^ *c f p-c V -J? ’ 'f 4ocyM* 9 t>*o*V<,pi as :^4. -7 C •►O'^JJ C P? V<»'ae' C Lv*x'' P£ 4^^ « Mia'v: »f 9 P? •.•jr* 9 9“*^ PC P't^ C PulVPt • * ’^C-41 t *''3i.V P? • '.• * la"** J “r r^-p' . pf • *4 . • >c p£ P*^ 0 . C4>A-^' PE ','^4P' Vjr-'Pi PE Vjr% 0 JV'jPti p If Qjn^ t «V V<iej B vP^Spn pf * P^'»;0 G'4vP» 'fi p£ Pp*^ C •' A . 4 * */ p '^g 4 c p .*••' r -•'V::* p£ Cfc c G »p' pf ^crp- P G •: .*. ’E 04^ A Vrvp^ *>9 C*‘4'^ei 4 £'C»«>*- -PC V Pfuvpnky Mjnjn V O uy> p t FEB 5 1991 Engineers A Architects February 4, 1991 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Attn: John Gerhardson Re: Well No. 3 Orono, Minnesota Our File No. 13949 Dear Mr. Gerhardson: Enclosed is the Eighth and Final Pay Request for Well No. 3 completed by Keys Well Drilling Co. This project has been completed according to the project plans, specifications and approved change orders. We recommend the City accept the final pay request and pay the contractor the final amount due. In addition, the following data has been enclosed for the City records. 1. 3. 4. 5. 6. State IC-134 Form. State Well Report. Well Log. Water Analysis Report. Chemical Analysis. Video Tape of Well Casing. An as build well record plan will be submitted to the City at a later date which will include pump and nK tfor information from the pumphouse contract currently under construction by Richroar Construction. If you have any comments or questions about this project, please call, Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. 0 Daryl L Kirschenman DUCdh Enclosures IIM Wbft HtgtMMy 3* • St. Paul. MlraiMOM Sifll • aia-4iaA400 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT DATEt January 25. 1991 PUCE:Orono. Minnesota PtOJECT: Municipal Wall No. 3 16" Production Well PEOJECT MO. : _ _ _ _ _ _ FILE NO.; 13949_ _ FOR PERIOD: From; Nov. 1. 1990 SPECIFIED CONTRACT To:Dec- 31, 1990 COMTKAC^OE1 Kaye Wall Drilling Company ^ .. A St COMPLETION DATE; June 15. 199C 413 ttorth La^ington Parkway MQUEST MN 55104 PAmNT NO.:_______8 & FINAL SUMMARY: 1.Original Contrr.ct Aoount 2.Change Order • ADDITION S 31.475.00 3.Change Order • DEDUCTION S :r' ■ :fe 4.Reviaed Contract Aaount 5.Value Coapleted to Date 6.Material on Hand 7.Aawunt Earned s.Less Retainaae 0 Z E V. 9.Sub^Total ;-r ‘•r 10.Less Aaount Paid Previously 11.AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 8 4 F S $ s s $ $ s $ $ |‘r,, t’- Piv:, Recoaaended for Approval by: ■1^'; 'ROO, ROSENE. AMDERLIK k ASSOCIATES. INC. By;n 4k 7 V ■ / / APPROVAL: 70.155.00 101^ S^O.OO 107.289.00 0.00 107.289.00 0.00 107.^289.00 96.937.05 10.351.95 Otttt Approved S WELL DRILLIMC COMPANY Contsactpe. P111949 Bt: nCEYS ¥1 contMcto^ By! 'kTT ) 1PtOJBCTt Municioal Veil No. 3 16* Production Veil PAYMENT NO.t 8 1 FINAL PLACEt Orono. Minnesota FILE NO. !13949 CONTRACTOR: Keys Veil Drilling CoiDoanv DATE:January 25. 1991 STATEMENT OF VORK Unit Est' d Quantity Amount Contract Item Unit Price Quantity To Date To Date ■Ait BTD II • 16 INCH PRODUCTION VELL Itf 1 MobilIcatIon. transporting of materials 6 equipment 1 settling up same for construction of 16* production well L.S.$6,000.00 L S 1 $6,000.00 liasLi brill open hole into top of Limestone to set 16” production well casing L.F.35.00 315 310 10.850.00 Hesi 3 Place 16* casing In open hole L.F.32.00 31b 312 9.984.00 Item A Place neat cement grout In annulas around 16* production veil casing C.V.200.00 20 24 4.800.00 Itesi 3 brill 16* open hole through the LlsMetone and Jordan L.F.25.00 160 190 4.750.00 Item 6 Dynamite for blasting Incl. labor for ebootlng, caps 6 wire Lbs.2.00 300 40 80.00 liXLl tail C.Y.40.00 400 340 13,600.00 Ham 6 fMcmieh, Install I remove air compression aqmlpt. for air surging of the veil L.s.1.000.00 L S 1 1.000.00 Item f Air surging of the veil Hrs.100.00 40 50.5 S.050.00 Ham 10 fmmleh. Install. 1 resmve test pump far capacity test of veil L.S.2.300.00 L S 1 2.500.00 p*g« 1 ■■I I' PROJECT: Hunicloal Well No. 3 16’ Production Veil PAYMENT NO.: 0 8 hNAL ' PLACE: Orono. Minneaota FILE NO. :13949 CONTRACTOR: Kevs Veil DrUline Company DATE:January 25. 1991 STATEMENT OF WORK Unit Est'd Quantity Amount Contract Item Unit Price Quantity To Date To Date Itf 11 Teat puaiplng Hrs.90.00 100 166 14.940.00 It— 12 Teltelte conpleteo veil L.S.950.00 L S 1 950.00 It— 13 Sterilltation of well upon completion, el—nup 8 veld cap on 16* caaing L.S.1.000.00 L S 1 1.000.00 TOTAL RASE BID II - 16* PRODUCTION WELL $75,504.00 CNANGI ORDER NO. 1 It— 1 Provide ailt fence along Nvy 12 L.S.$975.00 L S 1 $975.00 CMANOI ORDER NO. 2 lIMbA ——laN 8 Inatall air coaipreeiion equipt L.S.$1,000.00 1 $1,000.00 It— 1 B«r|0 1 bail veil Hour 100.00 180 199.75 19,975.00 It— 3 iMtall teat puep L.S.2.500.00 1 1 2,500.00 xia-iTeat p—ping Hour 90.00 100 81.5 7,333.00 TOTAL CIIAMCC OROEI NO. 2 - a OD Page 2 msf4f $30,810.00 I ■ fifiSitiri I-•■***.^-----------------•**^ I tr f-': - m-i;:': a*." b !Si' r .^■ V: •- raojscTtfUCfi Municipal tfcli No. 3 16" Production WellOrono. Minnesota_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _PAYMENT MO.: 6 t FINALFILE NO.: 13949 eONTKACTOR: Keva Wall Drilling Cowpanv DATE: January 2S, 1991 STATEMENT OF WORK Contract Item Unit Unit Price Est'd Quantity Aaount Quantity To Date To Date TOTAL E4SI BID IX - 16* PRODUCTION VELL TOTAL CilAllGE ORDER NO. 1 - ADD TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 - ADD $75,504.00 975.00 30.810.00 TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE $107,289.00 Pa|* 3 Plllf4f PBOTgr.T PAYMENT STATUS 1 cm I niOJECTi riLI NO.> eONTKACTOR: Orono, Minnesota Municipal Well No. 3 - 16* Production Well 13949 Keys Well Drilling Company MICIHAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $70,155.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS S31.475.00 MO. CHANGE ORDER DESCRIPTION 5.22>90 I Provide silt fence for Hwy 12 f-10-90 2 Development vork to Increase capacity TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS - ADD PAYMENT SUMMARY t I.' 1.1 PERIOD EL PROM PAYMENT THIS VOUCHER !- t 7 Start 4>l-90 5- 1-90 6- 1-90 7-31-90 9-1-90 10- 1-90 11- 1-90 3- 30-90 4- 30-90 5- 31-90 7- 31-90 8- 31-90 10- 1-90 11- 1-90 12-31-90 $21,456.70 10.315.10 11.020.00 6.692.75 18.468.00 10,022.50 18.962.00 10.351.95 fOlAL HYMIirr TO DATS ttTAXMAOt POR PAYMENT NO. TOTAL VALVE COMPLETED 8 IP $107,289.00 0.00 $107,289.00 PE13949 te' .... ■■ REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT $101,630.00 VALUE COMPLETED $13,850.00 33.444.00 45.044.00 52.089.00 71.529.00 82.079.00 102.039.00 107.289.00 amount $975.00 30.500.00 $31,475.00 RETAINAGE $1,129.30 1.672.20 2.252.20 2.604.45 3.576.45 4.103.95 5.101.95 0.00 \f i': I P ■ my. •. 'm Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk & Associates Cffo G 3c^**sffoo ^5 9oO^ 'JL 9c^e''* .os^cr C *''OA' • Pf t ^ :-c« PE c \c.es PE G Sc^>^*c*"* p§ V CP* fngintart A Architects A Gorjo^ p£ Or^'^ri X PoSTf* P£ C aur^^iOl PE A 9ou^'' PE Mj*a * -V'lC*' P£ * f Pf 9 PC Z3. c C .ji'Cta p£ •-r-ai A »>frv3'' PE V<^ae* J Pf .a-^e* P V.»e^<: p£ tf^'n^n P Af>Cpnon P| • •o^s PE Pooeh C PulVPC ^ I A "**C'*J» E ^•'jus PE -r'Aa'r; * P£ Zi-p . Ejjc 'TC'' PE va'« * >- PE *•* r . C j5.*.^' p£ Vj-.-Pi PE 0 A9«^'1 e P Ga'. ‘ ?. ~P2 *^6 N^**PS I Jfrnpr> PE ^ p^Miio G'p'^ ♦? PE •pne C P'u^'yr P ' A ^qrt\ V Prg A c p .p»% D pf CfC'iiO 0« V#* »E Poop^ p 3'?ccw PE A Mere'* p£ C*^pries A E''c«vcx' IPC M PA a ^U v Njfijn M OHor» February 5, 1991 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Attn: Mr. John Gerhardson Public Works Director Oa FEB 6 1995. % ^ a Rat Lift Station Nos. 10 & 43 Replacement BRA File Mo. 13940 Oaar Johns Bnclotod pleata find four (4) copies of Change Order No. 1 for the overrun of 4|unntitia8 for tha above referenced project. We recommend that the City approve this change order and make final payment. If you have any questions regarding this isatter, please contact us. Yours vary truly. iSTtOO. ROSENE. .ANDBRLIK i ASSOCIATES. INC. (./C larlan H. Olson mOtpahtonc urn »1hswy U • St. Paul, imrwmou SSftl • 6f2-«S*^M00 1 !t'' CHANGE ORDER MTti PUCBt nOJBCTt CONTKACTOti CIANOB OKDEIl NO.i February 5, 1991 Orono, Hinnesota Lift Station No. 10 ( ^3 Replactment ... ^ Latour Conttructlon. R» 1 PO Bo* 76. Maple Lake. HH 1 FILE NOt 13940 SS35B PtSCBlPTION OF WORKt __ . . ki.4 In Maw ftf 1989 and the orislnal low bidder was unable to cooiplete the ^ J ” "'n into . contract .Ith Utour Con.truction to !r?i« nuf.iu .Sd inU "bl. .t.r«d « ..tum to nom.l. goc.u.. of th. hlgh.r i«« li«l IddUliiol inprovid pip. foundition «. r.qulr.d. Addltlon.1 tr« twov.l ... M^IridW ilout. »to uotklng condition., dntt. .ggrog.t. b... .nd .nc.v.tlon ... raquirad within the Novthehore Harlna and along County Road 19. The frllovlng i em§ ar b« added to the contract. Change Order Itea FART K - LIFT STATION NO. 10 Clear and grade trees Claae S lOOZ crushed shouldering laprowed pipe foundation TOTAL FAIT A > ADD PAIT ■ LIFT STATION NO. 43 Xnproeed pipe foundation CosBon escalation Claae 9 aggregate base Clear and grade trees Unit Unit Price Esfd Quantity Total Aaount Each Ton L.F. $205.00 9.00 2.00 3 41.25 546 $613.00 371.23 1.096.00 $2,082.29 L.F. C.Y. Ton Each $2.00 2.10 9.00 203.00 2.633 223 276.4 3 $S.270.0D 472.90 2.487.60 619.00 TOTAL FART ■ - ADD $•.■49.10 TOTAL FART A TOTAL FART B $2.002.23 8.84S.10 TOTAL THIS CHAMGC ORDER NO. 1 $10,927.33 Page 1 P**-llf40CO «ir —■ ■w V-. "• i' b^dlcduL^i..:^, rucct rHOJBCT t CONTRACTORi CIANGB ORDER NO.t CHANCE ORDER February 5, 1991 Orono, Minnesota Lift Station Mo. 10 fc 43 Replacement Latour Conftructlon, RR 1 PO Box 76, Maple Lake, MN 1 FILE NOt 13940 55358 1' i:- r M Bonestroo Rdsene Anderllk & Associates It j 3' I, ®c * .Z”SC** J "l-T •. *•• •£ r ®? '. i <*.M'. ' 5 - » • '* '4 *. .* •*: C*»'* 0 “ . ' V =“•• - ^ C .'r Enginttrs A Archittcts t rc *.* ' »• ’ arf #*• • ' « J f A *? C ..T'- •,*jft ff 5; *• - r ».X>^ '1 ^ ^ —4- r *' i»£ - . . - * -•••T •• "rf'-e EJseT'" va • * >; ■*£ p , •’f Vjrt ::^ A;i «. -»t '}a’\ •■ »- 4-^ > =*•“ C V »'• ! * : ■- : - *r- '-cr- 9 Z ti ... E A '/O'T • E- -fC M 0*10^ L I; M February 5, 1991 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnestua 55323 FEB 5 1991 <<fe Attn: Mr. John Gerhurdson WeU No. 3 Orono, Minnesota Our File No. 13950 Dear Mr. Gerhardson: Attached is the fourth pay request for the Pumphouse No. 3 project. This pay request covers work completed through February 4, 1991. We recommend the City accept this pay request and pay the contractor the amount due. If you have any questions, please call. Yours very truly. BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK & .ASSOCIATES, INC. I^iyi L. Kirschenman DUCidh Enclosure 13950COR din 2fM Wtai Mifhi—y M • St. Paul. Mnneiaia SSitJ • «I2<4; REQUEST FOR PAYMENT OATEt February *. 1991 FLACE:Orono. Minnesota FROJECT t PuMPhouaa Mq._3 PROJECT NO.i FILE NO.: 13950 FOR PERIOD: Prow: Dec. 22. 1990 To: Feb. 4. 1991 SPECIFIED CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: CONTRACTOR« Richaar Construction APPRRSSi 777R Alden Way_ _ _ _ Frldl^ay. MN 3SA32 RtQVBRr t^R FAYNlNT^NO^i_ _ _ _ r'^ \ SdllkARY>^ ^ 1. 2. 3. A. S. f. 7. I. f. 10. 11. Cham l^nal Contract Amount tanga Order - ADDITION Change Order - DEDUCTION Revlaed Contract Amount Value Completed to Date Haterial on Hand Amount Earned Leea Retalnage 5 I gub'Total $ $ 7.440.00 Leaf Amount Paid Previously AHOOHT DOE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: $ $ S s $ s $ $ Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK A ASSOCIATES. INC. OVRER APPROVALt 211.340.00 218.780.00 153.340.50 0.00 153.340.50 7.667.03 145.673.47 78.844.30 66.829.17 Site I Approved ayt^_Rj^HMAR CONSTRUCTION, Contractor By: llfSOPR '■ii: f iiisora Pag. 1 #tOJt£Tt PuBDhous* No. 3 PAYMENT NO.:4 PLACEt Orono. Minnesota FILE NO. :13950 CONTRACTORt Rlchntf Construction DATE:February 4. 1991 STATEMENT OF WORK Unit Esfd Quantity Amount Contract Iten Unit Price Quantity To Date To Date ■ARE BID • PyHPHOUSE NO. 3 Hobiliaa 1 Bond L.S.SA.OOO.OO L S lOOZ $4,000.00 Sit* Piping L.S.9,500.00 L S lOOZ 9.500.00 Drain Nanhola 1 Piping L.S.2.500.00 L S 1001 2.500.00 ilta Grading (initial)L.S.2,500.00 L S 50Z 1.250.00 lit* Grading (finish)L.S.4,500.00 L S Orivavay L.S.5.500.00 L S Conerata A Masonry L.S.33.890.00 L S 95Z 32.195.SO Door* Vindoa A Hardware L.S.3.200.00 L S 90 Z 2.880.00 Corpantry L.S.2.900.00 L S lOOZ 2.900.00 Boofing A Sheet Metal L.S.6.500.00 L S 80Z 5.200.00 Boof Hatch L.S.1.400.00 L S frtcaat Roof Plank L.S.4.100.00 L S lOOZ 4,100.00 Lnb Cabinatt A Sink L.S.3.800.00 L S # Hinting L.S.4.300.00 L S 50Z 2.150.00 ■yHro-Pnaynatic Tanka L.S.19.500.00 L S lOOZ 19.500.00 L.S.6.100.00 L S lOOZ 8.100.00 Proeaaa Piping L.S.8.500.00 L S 80Z 8.000.00 Miac. Pluaibing A Air Piping L.S.4.800.00 L S 90 Z 4.320.00 funp A Motor L.S.18.500.00 L S lOOZ 18.500.00 Iliik Pumphou8« No. 3 PAYMENT NO.sPLACEi Orono. Hinnasota FILE NO. s 13950CONTBACTOR: Richnar Construction DATE:February 4. 1991 STATEMENT OF WORK Unit Est' d Quantity Amount Contract Itto Unit Price Quantity To Date To Date PASE BID. CONT'D. Plow Hater L.S.2.100.00 L S loor 2.100.00 Chock Valve L.S.2.600.00 L S lOOZ 2.600.00 Chaai. Paed Equipt.L.S.7.000.00 L S 902 6.300.00 Air Cond. 6 Ventilation L.S.7,250.00 L S 502 3.625.00 tlactrlcal (rough*in)L.S.6.500.00 L S 1002 6.500.00 MCC i Controls L.S.31,200.00 L S 202 6.240.00 Blac. Plxturas k Finish L.S.6.800.00 L S Inatall A* topsoil, seed, fartllltar k aulch Acre 4.000.00 0.5 TOTAL BASE BID VOIK iljMIfUl !«o» \ Biikititttt* prvfonMd wall I roof panolt la llott of wood ahakaa on tha oaniard roof aa ADO or DEDUCT L S $2,900.00 L S TOTAL ALTEINATE NO. 1 « OP. i fAET A « iOFT BTABT TYPE STABTEB itvlro ootor starting oqulp. to a •iso B Allan Bradlay soft start L.S.$3,360.00 TOTAL PAET A - ADD Page 2 UfSOPB $149,260.30 $0.00 $0.00 ftOfttfT! PLACEt Pimohouit No. 3Orono. Mlnntiota CONTRACTORt Richaar Construction PAYMENT NO. i_ _ _ _4FILE MO. I_ _ _ _13950 DATE: February 4, 1991 STATEMENT OF WORK Contract Item Unit Unit Price Est'd Quantity Quantity To Date Amount To Date L.S. PART R - COLD WEATHER CONDITIONS Heat and cover for masonry vork Additional labor for cold weather work L.S. Temporary heating and equip, protection L.S. TOTAL PART B - ADO PART A $2,930.00 650.00 500.00 1 1 1 1 1 1 $0.00 $2,930.00 650.00 500.00 $4,080.00 - fc-PBn.TRCT PAYMENT STATUSCITYi PlOJECTt riLt NO.t CONmCTORt Orono, Hinnesota Punphouse No. 3 139S0 Richnar Construction OtlClWAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $211,340.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS $7,440.00 REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT $218,760.00 filXt 12-5-90 NO. 1 2 3 CHANCE ORDER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT factor startar; Provide heat I labor for winter conditions $7,440.00 PtOJlCT PA!i_li TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS - ADD SUMMARYt tta. PERIOD im n I I? 8-1-90 11- 1-90 12- 1-90 12-21-90 10- 31-90 11- 30-90 12- 21-90 2-4-91 PAYMENT THIS VOUCHER $22,074.20 24.29S.30 32.474.80 66.829.17 fOUL PAY«NT TO DATE ^ ■miMOl POt PAYMENT NO 10TAL VALOI COMPLETED $145,673.47 7.667.03 $153,340.50 iSfSOPI VALUE COMPLETED $3,043.00 28.617.00 62.801.00 153,340.50 $7,440.00 RETAINACE $1,161.80 2,440.50 4,149.70 7,667.03 i m: 13091.1 TO* FROM* DATE; Mayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson, City Adrainistrat January 30, 1991 rc ■' ■* 1991 SUBJECT* Council Position Appointment Attachment:A. Proposed Resolution Declaring a Vacancy in the Office of CounciImember B. Council Position - Interviews Memo Dated 1/24/91 C. Proposed Resolution of Appointment to Fill Vacancy on the City Council ISSUE • 1. Adopt proposed resolution Attachment A declaring a vacancy in the office of CounciImember. 2. Selection of an individual to serve as a CounciImember to fill the unexpired two year term on Council. 3. Adopt proposed resolution Attachment C appointing person to fill Council vacancy. INTRODUCTION - The Council held interviews of the following persons at the Council meeting January 28, 1991: Tim Pattrin Nilliam Renney Nlllard Shull Mary Butler Robert Minkema Charlie Kelley It had been indicated that Mr. Hollander and Mr. Kramer had withdrawn their names from consideration prior to the meeting. To the extent that the Council does make an appointment at the February 11» 1991 Council meeting and to the extent that person is in attendance Dorothy Rallin, City Clerk could be available for swearing in should that be desired. ALTERNATIVES 1. Select an individual. 2. Table for further discussion. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, Council adopts Resolution • declaring a vacancy on the City Council, selects to fil*Tthe position of the two year unexpired tern which expires December 31, 1992 and adopts Resolution a resolution of appointment to fill vacancy on the City Council. Ayes __, Nsys /f 777K/4'/^^ ri VI'.' M-I r |5 A RBSOLDTION OP APPOINTMENT TO PILL A VACANCY ON THE CITY COUNCIL NBBRBAS, Barbara Peterson was elected Mayor of the City of Orono creating a vacancy on the City Council effective January 1991; and WHERJUkSf the City Council adopted Resolution Number ____ Declaring a Council Vacancy on February 11, 1991. NOW, THBRBPORB, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, appoints _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ to fill the vacancy. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held February 11, 1991. ATTEST: Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk mrf 12491. TOt 71I0M: DhTE Mayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson^ City Administra January 24, 1991 SUBJECT: Council Position * Interviews Attachments: A. Letter to Applicants Dated 1/7/91 B. Council Poisition Applications Memo Dated 1/2/91 ISSUE - Interview the persons interested in Council position. INTRCyUCTION - As noted in Attachment B Council directed staff to notify the applicants that Council would interview interested persons at the January 28, 1991 Council meeting. Staff sent letters, Attachment A, to the applicants January 7, 1991 per Council direction. RBCOKMENDATION - It is recommended that Council interview the candidates and if Council so desires make the appointment either later in the meeting or table the decision until the February 11, 1991 Council meeting. I tv ^r<‘ h ‘VIi; '* I ^: ■ M* CITTo'l ’^*'"-" CU'Vf"Poll Offic* Boi 66«Crytcai Bay, Minna oiKirBar On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka anuary 7, 199L ^ 1 I C 13 R«: Intarview for City Council nember Oaar As an Individual who has expressed interest in the vacancy on January 28, 1991 meeting to be Interviewed. The interview will consist of any introductory comments you aay desire to make regarding yourself and your background in the position together with responses to the following questions. I.What Interests you in serving as a member of the Orono City Council? 2.What attributes do you possess that would be of benefit to the City of Orono as a Councilmember? 3. respond as to your thinking on the following items. - Highway 12 corridor development * Long term street and transportation planning - raeilities needs - Lake Ose and Management - Cooperation with other municipalities I CouneU^laming ’^o^eaion responsibilities and relationship 4.What areas <to you feel are important for the Council to foous on for the rest of 1991 and for 1992. oua to elM .laetlon of Bacbata Patarson aa u. R4X-4734fM January 1, 1991 paga 2 I' from data of appointment through the end of 1992. The individual appointed can file for election for an open po-tition in November 1992. In addition to the election for this term, another four year Council position and the two year Mayoral term will be on the November 1992 ballot. Prior to the meeting on Monday, January 28, 1991, you will be notified of an approximate time to appear at the Council meeting. Sincerelyrs - •/ / *• ziark E. Befnbardson City Administrator 12:i9C MTn^.(eL'ri TOj PlOH: DATBs Mayor and City Council V^.!ark E. Bernhardson, City Administratqi* January 2, 1991 80BJBCT: Council Position Applications Attachments:A. Tim Pattrin Letter Received 12/4/90 B. John M. Hollander Letter Received 12/11/90 C. William H. Henney Letter Received 12/19/90 D. Willard C. Shull, III Letter Received 12/26/90 E. Mary C. Butler Letter Received 12/27/90 F. Robert L. Minkema Letter Received 12/27/90 G. Charles M. Kelley Letter Received 12/28/90 H. Marvin J. Kramer Letter Received 12/31/90 I. Draft Letter to be Sent to Prospective Applicants ISSUE - Presentation to Council of applications received by persona interested in the Council position. IWTAODUCTION - iot closing applications. As of December 31, 1990, the deadline established the applications, the City has received 8 DISCUSSION - As noted in the letter, interviews had been estabTTslied prior at the Coucil’s November 26, 1990 meeting, interviews have tentatively been set for January 28, 1991 with tentative consideration for appointment at the February 12, 1991 meeting. ALTERNATIVES - 1. Accept the information. 2. Give any further direction regarding the application process. 3. Table for further consideration until the January 28, 1991 Council meeting. RBCOMMINDATION - After accepting the Information presented CogetfiTer wi^h giving any direction in regard to the process, it is recommended that the Council table further consideration of this matter until the January 28, 1991 meeting at which time Council will interview interested applicants as part of that agenda and if so desired make the appointment either later that evening or at the February 11, 1991 meeting. PROrOSEO MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that Council accepts the information and~Tirects tabling the matter until January 28, 1991 when Council will interview applicants interested in the Council position. Ayes __, Nays __. cct Department Reads /Irrrt^'fi 1 December 3, 1990 DEC 4 1S3C Mayor Peterson and City Council Orono City Hall P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mayor Peterson and Council I wish to apply for the open council chair position which will be vacated by Mrs. Peterson in January. Although only living in Orono for four years. I have grown attached to our community and have many concerns for it s future. I have followed the council happenings closely ever since I moved here, and in fact, was considering running in the next election. My concerns for Orono lie in the area's of growth; i clarification of building restrictions and standardizations of requirements upon application; the Hwy. 12 corridor: new construction or modification of city facilities; our police station; and finally, the maintenance and faculties at our city parks. With my strong background in cable television. I would be a great asset in if^QQlfuliQns and dealings with Triax's Orono franchise. I have worked closely with a variety of mayors, city councils, and police departments in psft. I am familiar with how they work and their needs. Perhaps with my public relation background and promotion skills. I can benefit the QQiifiQil with dealing with the press and the community. I looking forward in having an interview with you at your earliest convenience Sincerely. Tim Pattrin f' k ■ u V-. Timothy J. Pattrin 1360 Railroad Avanua P.O. Box 51 Crystal Bay, Minnasota 55323 Homa: (612) 475-1921 Work: (612) 476-3099 MARITAL STATUS: MvrttdIs Sandy Pattfki, I havt two chiidran Tim (9) and Mitchell (7). l have lived in Orono since 1967 at I960 Raliaad Avenue. BOUCATION: SI. Cloud auieUnivertlty tiSlBf: Man Csniwunications St. Cloud Apollo Graduated 1975 I tiava meelered M aapecit o( industrial television production. With my seventeen years of working in eaaie. I have adeer understanclng of cable television franchising and what it can do for a community, i also have an good bacfcoreund m advertising, promotion, and public relationsIS AWARDS: NFLCP Program of the Year Award 1988 NPtCP BduoMonal Program of the Year Award 1987 ••le.i#C* V«BO COORDINATOR DBM 3M WfeyzMa Pubic Schools WMi mM gmduoe 8 vartMy of video mMerfals for admMstration and classroom use. televise ai events in OSMISe.eadudMgiddwnoning events. Oversees equipment purchases and constmction of seven IslesISsn sMtoli «id IMwvor Meractlve classrooms. Supports television prorkrction instmctlon ii^al gndilaveS. TrMiSIMpiograinmlnginiothraedMerenicabietystom.reachmgover 120,'^^ ^ feomaianaiilaoWy. Sfeve 1966.1 have been lesponsMe for the cresdon of over a thousand programs on SiasliifineL NegoMiConMwihsatsiNe networks for carry on our channei. PREBLANCf PROOUCO ______2S.gO second televloion spots during «M peal five years for the Bartiey-Undsay Company, also giidueMafileenminuledealerrocniiting video in 1987. ** prodyion — - tacaHss outside the Twin CWes. 0- rc. i.'.. if - Hi im rk DtCtfnbtr 1962-August 1985 EDUCATION DIRECTOR Stortr Cabl« Coimnunications Northwest RESPONSIBILITIES: I iiiinn between one hundred schools and the cable company in the Northwest Suburban ncpchise. IHerlert a five member education staff dedicated in producing education video material for classroom use: train studenta/etaff in production; and provided any other serviced requested by educators. Produceo lom show that featured VMrig/Qopher highlights, interviews, player guests, oommentary, and predictlone. Managed six education cable channels on one of Minnesota's largest cablesystems. Augusti980 to Deoember 1982 PROGRAM DIRECTOR Storer Cable Communications. St. Cloud, Minnesota 56301 RESPONStSIUTIES: Putcfiase equlpmehl and develop a public access/local origination studio. Oversee production personnel and iraeme, produce and televise local programmirtg and local news in the four city area. Sen/ed as company flaison between the various city halls, police departmerrts, churches, and schools. Repaired varioue production equipment. COMMITTEES SERVED: 1989 to preeent: Mebo Sports Cable Programming Committee 1999>1999: Lake Minnelonka Area Education Cooperative 1991*1993: Board of Direciors of Tri-County Crime Stoppers 1991*1993; Advertising Chair of St.Cloud Wheels. Wings, and Water Festival. REFERENCES: Gary Nunn Olatrict 284 Wayzata Public Schools Audkwiaual Offloa 12000 RidQtmount Avtnua Plymouth, MInnaaota 55441 Ranaa LaViona AduaRlainQ Managtf SatSay/lifidaay Company P.O.BOXS74 SL Cloud. Mbmaaota 56302 13120-6 County Road 6 Plymouth. Minnaaota 55447 i- . - r f-'.' p; r? ^717(Qf/M^r BJohn M. Hollander 200 Hollander Road v;ayzata, Minnesota 55391 • r 1 1 1 Mr. Mark Bernhardson City Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 DEC 1 1 1390 Dear Mr. Bernhardson: I am interested in the city council seat being vacated by Mayor Elect Barbara Peterson and I have enclosed my resume. 1 have been a resident of Orono for 34 years and through my education in Real Estate and my experience in Business, I am <|ualified to be a member of the city council. Z a** also interested in protecting the natural environment and to resolve any differences between the city of Orono and other communities. I agree with Barbara Peterson that the existence of 1394 is a reality and that we must work cooperatively. Sincerely, John M. Hollander ii'‘ P: John M. Hollander 200 Hollander Road Orono, Minnesota 476-8504 557-2430 Resident of Orono since 1956 Age 52 1990 1989-1990 1989 1987-1990 1987-1989 1979-1983 1985-1987 1971-1987 1977 1965-1974 197.1 1969-1971 1970 President and owner of Hollander Associated Professionalsr Inc. Member Greater Minneapolis Board of Realtors, Minnesota Association of Realtors, National Association of Realtors, Duluth Area Association of Realtors, Organization of Commercial Realtors, Multiple Listing Service, and Commercial/Industrial Listing Service. Formed Hollander Associated Professionals, Inc. Passed Real Estate Brokers License Exao* as required by Minnesota Department of Commerce. Completed and passed the 30 hour Real Estate Brokers Course at Prosource. Completed and passed the 30 hour Real Estate Course 3 and the 30 hour Real Estate Course 2 at Prosource Completed and passed the 30 hour Real Estate Course 1 at the Minneapolis Vocational Institute. Member of the American Legion Post 1902 Semi-retired Vice-President of Holly Acres Development Corp. Member North Hennepin Community College Choir Business Consultant for Hollander Publishing Co., Inc. Received a patent for the "Used Vehicle Disassembly System and Method". Conducted many seminars throughout the U.S• at the Automobile and Truck Recyclers and Dismantlers Conventions. Publisher and Author of the "Photo Facyclopedla". Vice President of Hollander Publishing Co., Inc. Graduate of Minnesota School of Real Estate (Graduated highest in class) r. -■ i', •V, 1965-1969 Sales Manager of Hollander Publishing Co., Inc. 1966-1968 Publisher and Editor of "Just Plain Horse" magazine. 1962 Member of the University of Minnesota Student Senate Associateion. Elected to the Presidency of the General College Student Board. Vice President of General College Student Board (turned down Presidency because President did not have any voting rights) 1956 Founder and 1st President of the Minnetonka Citizens Radio League. Other Interests Music, fishing, horseback riding, skiing, dancing. Collecting Records, Paintings and Antiques. J I p • |r" /I;TT7KU(M€^,tC UJLIAM H. HEIVNEY Attorney at Law •/' AiimiilMl in Ml «nd Florida felfek:.. • ^'. l-'^.510L,2hifflMi AvcniM ** _MinBiiooki. MN 55345 (612) 474-4406 December 13, 19‘^0 ItEC ^ s XSC-J Orono Clcy Council Clcy of Orono 1335 South Bro»n Road Orono. Mlnn««oca 55391 Daar Mayor and Councllmembers July. 1987. iiWS-SesrIPI conpr^anslve plan. I alao fe«l chat rhe Council should hav*» a meaber ^rom the Ncuarra area. Mv nelahbors and the Na^mrre businesses '.^Id 7* Your consideration Is appreciated irely. VlIllaB H. Henney pfh ancl. p k I U 5^- f B- WILLIAM H. HENNEY Hore Office 29<^1 Casco Polnc Road Orono. Mlmesoca 55391 (612) 471-0050 5101 Thimsen Avenue. Suite 200 Minnetvonka. Mlnne«?ota 55345 re12) 474-4406 Self-emploved actomev since 1983. practicing in the areas of comBerclal law, real estate and litigation. Gustafson 6 Adams. P.A. 1982 - 1983 as an associate attomev in the areas of busines.s, banking and real estate. Metropolitan Leasing, Inc., Minnetonka. Mimesora i9‘^9 - 1982 First Bank Grand. St. Paul. Minnesota 1978 - 1979 EDUCATION Ullllan Mitchell College of Law. St. Paul. Minnesota University of Minnesota. IXiluth. Minnesota Fosston High School, Fosston, Minnesota PERSONAL Date of Birth: Health: Married: 2/26/56 Excellent Brenda S. Kokesh PROFESSIONAL Haber ships Anerlcan Bar Association Minnesota Bar Association Florida Bar Association Heraiepln Couity Bar Association Hennepin County Arbitration Board of Directors - OPUS CondoainiuDn Mlmetonka. Minnesota Rafemces Punished upon request . iX,: ■ '.y '•> =. r December 21, 1990 /iTT^d/flfexj^ i) Ms. Barbara Peterson, Mayor and Orono City Council Orono City Hall P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Council Members: I Mould like to place my name in consideration for the vacant seat on the Orono City Council. I am available for interviews with you individually or meeting as a group almost at any time except the week of January 13-20. I have been an Orono resident for nearly 22 years. My wife and I currently live on Springhill Road with 4 of a total of 8 children from previous marriages. All of our children attended Orono schools at various times during their growing up years. I would bring the following interests and strengths to the Orono Council: 1.My education and career have been concentrated in the financial area. I have a strong interest in the continuing econunic viability of Orono without a commercial tax base. Orono will continue to grow in population and we must maintain a strong credit rating. 2.I am deeply Interested in the environment. Me must protect lakeshore, wetlands, and green spaces for the enjoyment of all residents while we develop the community. We must encourage recycling and renewal where appropriate. 3.I have no answers, but I am curious about the long-term financial viability of Long Lake, a city surrounded by Orono, and the opportunities for both areas to cooperate rather than to duplicate infrastructure and services. II am Interested In a rational approach to resolve the question whether Highway 12 should be upgraded and/or the traffic diverted. I believe that ccMBerclal through-traffic does not benefit Orono, that no road should be so big that there is not congestion during rush hours, and that protection of the environment 1$ more Important than building a road which would encourage more traffic through Orono. My resume Is attached. Thank you for your consideration Sincerely, Millard C. Shull, III n' K. ■:r r E^V *,' t i, : Resume Willard C. Shull, III Data of Birth: PIact of Birth: December 6, 1940 St. Paul, HN Parants:Willard C. Shull, II (deceased) Rosanna R. Shull Children:Martha W. Shull Willard C. Shull, IV Basidanca since 1977:1125 Spring Hill Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Previous residence:1950 Fox Ridge Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Business address:777 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55402 fiip1o>Mnt Dayton Hudson Corporation Senior Vice President 1980 Vice President-Finance 1976-1980 Treasurer 1974-1980 Assistant Treasurer 1972-1974 Financial Analysis Mgr. 1971-1972 Previous aa^lovaent: Northland Equity Corporation Vice President & Treas. 1969-1971 Archer Daniels Midland Company Budget & Control Mgr. 1964-1969 education:Harvard Business School NBA 1963-1965 Yale University BA 1958-1963 St. Paul Academy Junior and High School Bthtr Affiliations: Married Spouse: Laurie J. Shull April 23, 1943 Rochester, NY Jerome T. Syverton (deceased) Mildred Syverton Jane M. Bart.ig Henry T. Morrison Laura S. Gueringer Alexandra B. Morrison Catherine T. Morrison Elizabeth Y. Morrison The Needlenest Owner/Proprietor Saint Martin's by the lake Church First Trust Company Science Museum of Minnesota Metropolitan Economic Development Assn. Voyageurs (Minnesota) Outward Bound School United Way of Minneapolis Junior fhirtor of Commerce Junior Acnievmwnt •Ig Brotlitrs Sheltering Arms Foundation Wayzata Garden Club Minnetonka Garden Club siunior League iiiii r • . .• ,rf4 PPMmMMAW iNM •• •• —1:*A * • * ^ • ♦• •• A \*i» « •«»«' *■ ^ .*'**• *•• ^v:; M ... ' • ♦ • . • ^ • .••••••r .'••’■ .'U;- ■,' i* • *•• ‘ \IT. • ‘ ‘ *4 ^ - . • 7*' r, • v% •. #-• % • i; ,;. t*:'' •«.•*» V j*.‘ ‘r ?.' * l>- •• • -. t •• ..■ •: 'W '• mi jmt^ i ^ f w ^ ^ . •,. . •; • *• .......-„■ -U.-<;' . ■ ■^•' .\ ' '• r**/ ^atw ^Ut& / ^oMOta/. rr/Hh^/ttelir £ - '. I K 27 1^T-! f ca n X .ViTvSJ ''N-4rVsjw .'mi r V ^ \^a>vV ^TOO(V>sy W^> V vv S^ \.<v X^uOJ^VK CJ lT'SmKXJ^-S'^A,x: 'cu. 'X. 4T \ A'^^^3 Wvyvj- '^<;;:^>jk:»’'i, L■.'^ :.r •r •r.T^-v - •».- •. i ■ •• *‘ *^‘— • * ' .*•* f * < •• -,V A# ' • •♦ f»-» ^l«i%^;«.: <> «.%.«i[#^ •> w-« •• W^M i«".‘^i t t V •• /IrrTKh^/ffevT f t • •• I w i %'r; 'J: i--- h H- ■ik Decenber 26^ 1^90 1880tT Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Orono Crystal Bay, Minnesota 3200 Bayside Road Orono, Minnesota 55356 Dear Mayor and city Council, I an writing to request ccnsideraf n the city council position that has been vacated by the nt elected Mayor Barbara Peterson and will become open effective January 1, 1991. I am a resident of Orono who is deeply ccruaitted to the preservation of our community. As a husband and father • a priority was to reloc;*te in this area. My wife and I • ^ the openness, peace and security provided by a less popule residence. We thoroughly appreciate our daily encounters with nature and wildlife. We feel comfort in the fact that our son will received excellent educational opportunities. Although we treasure these unique aspects that life in orono provides, we do not take them for granted. With knowledge of currant controversial issues that potentially pose a threat to the residents of Orono, I feel the need to get more involved. I am eager to find a mutually sgresable solution for the residents of Orono and Long ^ke in to the proposed Highway 12 expansion. As an active member on the Orono citizen's Advisory Committee, I am anxious tc resolve the current city facilities problem. I believe I can most directly impact the residents of Orono k. providing them with another council member who is consistently willing to listen wholeheartedly and impartially to all concerns. Thank you for your kind attention and consideration of this letter. Sincerely, Robert L. Minkema Robert L. Minker.a 3200 Bayside Road Orono, Minnesota 55356 (612) 476-0508 EDUCATION Orono High School - Graduated 1976 Gustavus Adolphus College - Graduated 1980 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE - Certified Public Accountant Gruys Johnson and Associates Certified Public Accountants 1580 - 1984 Robert L. Minkema, CPA, Ltd. Certified Public Accountant 1984 to Present IV f r. V.' f|t:v * COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT Member of Trinity Lutheran Church Member of Orono citizen's Advisory Committee COMPETENCIES Experience in city financial auditing and management Strong personal computer application knowledge rf.» f:\ •/. \.v* -m .* •< Iv- > • • • V •« • • . •■•.. . * * •K•• *••-• •• .» / * * •. • • — .7* • • ■•• • ** rs__5 • w,., . X *vt •••• , '■« ■ . •. -•• , L « A » ••. •♦ • •• . i ‘K V. X*m • «• W9 ■ . • ■ . -i* - •• . •• .. ^ 1 • ••• *• •. • • • *#V ' % • WV«» /• pi*^**. 4* . • . .• « • #•• •*. k — • . A .- ■ • “ \ * . • /. •. • •.». . . Char’es M. KeiUy 272C White Oak Crcie Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 JT77f(i^<^"^ ^ ^ “ z' ^ / ''7 , . - ^ z* «ii^ ,4r ''2*- -V' » i,''/• i-/ / . /' i / / . V Cy^^-rjc: y / '4'ic.- <C.- ’ r i /li77?f(l///^€b V-/ If aUlt C-'Lc-0£C 3X 5-. ‘(■i' iSQO /lir^■C y '/ //*^;t— -tt (..V Ir I fi: fP r ; ’ 'a. ,V/;' ■•V. ph'V iii / L 777 ■2 ‘Jo '^'-c VI C. CcA- )Z 30 V7 fi- i ■ •/{TrAOjf^e^r-L. I r f • \ Re: Interview for City Council Member Dear As an individual who has expressed interest in the vacancy on the City Council created by the election of Barbara Peterson as Mayor, I would like to invite you to the Council s Monday, January 28, 1991 meeting to be interviewed. The interview will consist of any introductory comments you may desire to make regarding yourself and your background in the position together with responses to the following questions. 1. What Interests you in serving as a member of the Orono City Council? 2.What attributes do you possess that would be of benetit to the City of Orono as a Counci Imember ? 3.Attached is a copy of the Council’s 1990-91 Goal Setting plus the City Administrator's 1991 Gcal Setting. Please respond as to your thinking on the following items: - Highway 12 corridor development • Long term street and transportation planning - Facilities needs - Lake Use and Management - Cooperation with other municipalities - Long term organizational planning . . - Council/Planning Commission responsibilities and relationship 4. What areas do you feel are important for the Council to focus on for the rest of 1991 and for 1992. Due to the election of Barbara Peterson as ^^ayor, her Council from date of appointment through the end of 1992. The individual appointed can file for election for an open position in November iear‘co5Scil*Uiltion Vlid Vh^ti^ylSr SayoraV^t'erm"wiiVbe®M the Wovember I9f2 ballot. Prior to the meeting on Monday, January 28, 1991, you will be aotiCisd of an approsimate time to appear at the Council meeting. Sincerely Nark S. Sernhardson City Administrator r r-' ^ /iTJPClHltlCUT ^ K RSSOLUTXOli OBCLARING A VACANCY IN THE OPPICB OP COORCILNENBBR OF THE CITY OF ORONO WBBRBASr with the election of Barbara Peterson as Mayor a vacancy has been created on the Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota effective January 1991. wont, TBBRBPORB« BB IT RBSOLVBD that a vacancy now exists for the office of CounciImember for the City of Oorno, Minnesota. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held February 11, 1991. ATTEST: Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk h ■ TO: PSOH: DATS: 13091.2 Mayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson« City Administrat^ January 30, 1991 SUBJECT: Park Commission Interviews ‘^•OWdo / Co NTS Attachment:A. Park Commission Application Dated 1/23/91 B. Letters of Invitation to Interviewees C. Attendance Record 1989 to 1991 D. Roles and Responsibilities of the Park Commission - Draft ISSUE 1. Interview individuals interested in the Park Commission positions. 2. Select individuals for those positions. 3. Determine if Council wants to develop an outline of roles and responsibilities for the Park Commission. INTRODUCTION - Attachment A was presented to the Council at the January 28, 1991 and interviews for new applicants was established for February 11th. Based on Council desires, Susan Wilson also requested to be in attendance. DISCUSSION - Selection"- As noted in Attachment A there are four terras which are available for appointment with three of the incumbents having indicated an interest in continuing. Roles and Responsibilities of Park Commission - Attachment D cepresents a dra£t prepared~Sy John Gerhardson that is tO be utilised as a guide for Park Commissioners. As noted, this charge brings together information contained in the City Ordinances, its Comprehensive Plan together with the historic cooperation of the Commission. ALTERNATIVES 1. Interview. 2. Select. 3. Table. RECOMMENDATION • It is recommended the Council after interviewing either select or table for further discussion until February 28th. In addition it is requested that the Council give direction as to the draft layout of Roles and Responsibilities for the Park Commission. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by appoint and seconded by __ that the Coucil to the Park Commission for a three year term. A^STtionally tTie Council directs staff after giving cosaents to refer the charge to the Park Commission for any input they would desire regarding the charge. Ayes __, Nays ^ 12391.• Ir r- y.' i.' TOs FROM: DATBt nayor and city Council Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrate^'^ '' January 23, 1991 SDBJBCTt Park Commission Applications Attachment: A. Advisory Board - Expiration of Terms Memo Dated 12/7/90 B. Richard Flint Letter Received 12/11/90 C. Susan Wilson Letter Received 12/12/90 D. Janes Gilbert Letter Dated 12/28/90 E. Tina White Letter Received 1/8/91 F. Sherokee Use Letter Received 1/14/91 G. Janes Anderson Letter Received 1/22/91 H. Stephen Johnston Letter Received 1/22/91 I. Advisory Board Selection Process Guidelines Dated 7/23/90 ISSUE ** Appointnent of Park Commission members. INTRODUCTION - The terms of four Park Commission members expired the end of 1990. As noted in Attachments B, C and D, Richard Flint, Susan Wilson and James Gilbert have indicated their desire to be re-appointed to the Park Commission for another three year term. Lee Erger indicated previously his desire to terminate his service on the Park Commission at the end of 1990. The appointee to fill Mr. Ergers position will expire on 12/31/92. RECOMMENDATION - After accepting the information presented togeFFer with giving any direction in regard to the process, it is recommended that the Council table further consideration of this matter until the February 11, 1991 meeting at which time Council will interview interested applicants as part of that agenda and if so desired make the appointment either later that evening or at the February 25, 1991 meeting. (Please let staff know if you desire to re-interview the current members who are re-applying.) PROPOSED MOTION - Moved bv , seconded by , that Council accepts the information and TTrects tabling Hie matter until February 11, 1991 when Council will interview applicants interested in the Park Commission appointments. Ayes __, Nays V h: ■t t •V r, K-! 1 TO:Mayor and City Council #\fjtOHx Mark E. Becnhacdson, City Adniinistratcir OATS:Decamber 7, 1990 3HBJBCT: Advisory Board - Expiration of .erms The following terms expire in the first 3 months of 1991; Pack CoaBlssiofi Richard Flint (Chair) Lee Erger James Gilbert Susan Wilson 12/31/90 12/31/90 12/31/90 12/31/90 All but at. Etg« have expressed interest in continuing as Park Cosusission members• PlaBBiiig James Hanson Ed Cohen At Large At Large 03/31/91 03/31/91 February. Others expiring the end of 1991: park CooBlsaien Alex Vongrles Philip Bradley Lester Kelley 12/31/91 12/31/91 12/31/91 LNCDJoEllen Burr 12/31/91 Bomb Services LaOean NcWilllams 12/31/91 I; fe IfkaKieife I Ilia, ifailii r- I* '.v'. U'!' ■,'i r. ■( ~b Oc ■< * V''"1405 County Road 6 Long Lake, MN 55356 December 10, 1990 Mr. John Gorhardson City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN SS323 Doar Johns This latter is to advise the Mayor, Council and City staff that Z wish to be considered for reappointment to the Orono Perks Cosnission when my term expires. I have enjoyed my work on the Parks Commission and feel that we have made progress over tlie past several years. I hope to be able to assist in building upon our past progress over the next several years. rely yours. Richard N. Flint RMPiers 0820y b: :lv' ^ h [' t ii:W'W^-li '. J'-^-'pf•!^:f e • u t- Ir k. H: { it ft rN-"-u±k //■ rn^(it^fH0^rd SusAX D. Wilson 2483 NORTHSnORE DRITE Watzata , Minnesota 33301 f \ >' // tC vj <A. .If- I » ^ ^ L a yyy^ui^x u^c w.^^w “ ji ju;t ^Hx udcitu, c\vjd> Jbc^ ^ >CMJC <**A. SrA '' v-^ j2&^ / t , y r * DEC 1 2 ^ 1 • r^.r h JAMES H. GILBERT 9S5 TonHawa Roac Long Lak*. Minnaaota 55356 t6 12) 471-0809 Horn* <612) 339-9121 Otfica UntcHiKevT h December 20, 1990 Nr. John Gerhardson CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Oaar John: rssponae to your recent letter to me concerning my Park Connisaion position, I would like to reapply for another term of ••rvics on the Park Commission. I have enjoyed my work on that comnission over the last two years, and would like to be consi­ dered by the new City Council for another term. If you need any further information from me, please let me know. Otherwise, I will consider this letter as my request for reappointment. Thank you. It has been fun «7urking with you the last couple of years and I hope you have a happy New Year. Yours truly. JK/nj m V • • * Dear Dorothy: /> jriGifMei}'''£ «■ « JAM • 8 1881 Jan.7,1990 .' It has come to my attention that you are in need of <i park commissioner for the City of Orono. As per our conversation on l-7-oi^ I am confirming ^ - i mm- interest In the position. <imin ^ m ^ ■ iab.'. ^ - in «air^ ^ s*. •— ' 13/ ------r ig a of background information on me, to let you know what I can contribute to the cause. tI I have lived in the community for over 2*5 vears. T am currently a substitute teacher in ten western suburban school districts. As a youngster my home was adjacent to the Baker Park reserve. I grew to appreciate the park system at a very early age. I continue to utilize that park even though I now live in Crystal Bay. My home is adjacent to the Crystal Bay Playground. I am glad to have it close by. I feel that our parks in Orono are a great asset to the cofflmunity« and 1 look forward to becoming involved in maintaii.ing and expanding them wherever possible. I look forward to hearing from you in regard to this matter. Sincerely, Tina Marie White Post Office Box HfZ Crystal Bay, Mn. 55323 Phone: 612-^176-0725 i i < Work Experiences: March !057-i^resent — '‘Century I i.everinQi Haislet ‘-sso' ijte"' "Realtor Three Million hollars in i> September losA-Pr^sent- Substitute reaching fen local Scintol nistri ; 13 June l?87-March 1?B6 Private lutoring Summer Srimol T*»aching Rockford Elementary-Summer i'^86 Orono Elementary-Summer February l*^86-May 1986 ^ Lead teacher Happy Hearts 'ii iis’ian .-;hool May 1906-January 1967 ^ l. tAssistant Director Hapr.y Hearts Cluistian jchool '1- •. 1. ♦ Community involvement: „ : „ 1 i akp MnMember of the Chamber of Commerc- m Loru Lake, h ^ ■reachlno Communiiv Education in the Orono jchool Dio-.. Past mpmhpr nf the Board of Eiders. «aple Plain .. . . .:- !^[assroom^vCiunteer‘in the Orono Scimol ‘ ri:Member of the Largest contributing orgamzati _ , .-"TTXthe Goodwill Easter Seals. JE-6 Ib-fe-col 1.,.-r a ■cKelor'of Science in Education . *^|^|l22mij^^*ociate of Degree '•err m Indergacten . 'riT-K inde ege ^ t #n. jrf ^ Wr*Iy^-cf»I iSood^tt*"ll.. - 0«a I- rF« tate L iCenSO^igiMS ii-rnirw:r'-TTtsasa «B-Activi t let fSS '•'•a m__^ fl 1 rr T,' viri€i •.■■■' w'lTT u r 4 ^ Hr 'itJ f January 13,199 Dear Orono Staff and Coundl, 1 would like io submit my in nomination for the Park Commission opening. I foal it a vaiy important community iob that has neat potential to positively Orono for years to come. I would appreciate me opportunity to oe a member of such a committee. Fbr a of years 1 have used Orono parks and have been concenied about such thiMn as s(|iiipmsnt» usage availability to the community. I believe that pariu naaoto taka into account the needs of all citizens, young and old. Bike and walking trails. I baliave the Park Conumssion needs to continue its important job of l^ing proactive in its process as it assists the Council and community in maintaining and seniring open spaces and park development. This is of utmost importance with the impaiiSrng push for development of Orano with the completion of 394. I foal I would bring to the Park Commission: attention to detail while keeping the bigger picture in mind, stick*to>itpaess and a *can do* attitude with a ^rsonal conaitmant to for the ftiture, and energy to work for the good of the Bunity. Aa the founder and President of a non-profit organization, the Pregnancy and Infant Lsaa Caatar, I have worked with others to turn dreams into reality providing a aatviaa la the population we serve. After having had a child die in 1981,1 took this pafMBilJuvdBhip tuinad it into something positive, wmking for Uie ^ood of “* * ^>al organization, is a intoBl^ years since itfs incepi .sipactsd leader in the field. • W • 1111 • M / * sett ing positive while woridng with many kinds of p wouild lika to share. la iddlttoB, •• A to I 1 •m II ia werldag with the city staff and council. I have iaduded my resume. Please consider for this Park Commission opening. Has rntOWOmaBt MN 66888Oreaalf 47M308 fi •t; r_. a I is 0-‘- Ik ''t- yv'.V • f^-;- .1 kf.-' Ai: f* r- - . •••' •ffmmm rm0^T~ ^ Januicy 2I« 1991 rmrtx To: City Cleck Parle Commlasion Vacancy I would like to aubmlt my name aa a candidate Cor the vacant poaltlon on the Ocono Park Commission. 1 have been an Ocono resident since March of I98S. My wife's coots ace here since she grew up in the orono area and members of hoc family have lived here for over thirty (30) years. He have two children, ages 10 and 13. who attend orono schools and uee the local packs and beaches. Ny background ineludee being a self-employed businessman in the Minnetonka area. I've been active in the past coachi^^ ' soccer, t-ball and girls softball. Involvement in the Ocono ft/htols includes being one of the past co-chairpersons of the Oroio Ninteefest foe two years and serving as one of the band percents for the Ocono Middle School Band. 1 would like to see an icpcovement apd expansion of our present pasks and faeilltiee in order to accommodate our predicted growth in population. Our family enjoys living in the Oror.o community and I feel the best way to preserve and/or improve the community in which we live, is to become involved. hodersoo ox Btreet ke. Ml SS35S 'A L-'-' ■li?; g-f /mff- •i-. fi- I 'i' ■te m f-: ■ ^1:. y-:- " '-V. iI hb----m January 2U 1991 Hr. tlark Barnhardson Adainlatrator City oi Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay* HN SS323 Bs! Park Board Vacancy Osar Hr. Barnhardxon: ACCSpt ay application lor tha currant vacancy on tha city's Park Board. As you knov* I hava baan looking for a way to tha cossunity ainca aovlng hara thraa yaara ago. I baliava that I hava tha axparlanca, aducation, and daaira to aarva that tha city is looking lor in a Park Board manbar. Upon raclaving ay dagra# in civil enginaarlng from tha Univarsity ol Mlnnasota I want to work lor tha city of Hapia Qrova. Sosa ol ay dutias which ara particularly appllcabla to this position includa} 1) tha daslgn ol pork lacilitiaa such aa trails* ball lialda and parking araaa. 2) capital laprovaaant projact planning which includad park lacilitiaa. and 3) daily intaraction with park dapartnant stall. My currant position as a consulting anginaar with Mar'la and Assoeistas has givan aa tha opportunity to dasiqn parks and trails lor tha citlas ol Hastings* Cagan* Plymouth, Hapia flrova* Uno Lsltas*and Cantarvilla. Through «y work in thasa and nunarous othar citlas I hava bacons lanlllar with tha park piafttijng procass. Our lira is currantly working on a nastar plan lor tha city ol North Oaks which includas a park lacility alanant. Xt is ny hops that I wl.’l ba abla to usa this background to haip inprova tha City's Parka progran. Particular goals ol nina Inolnrtsi Dtha axpansion ol a trail systan in tha city, 2) ^•tsgrstios ol racraational laeilltias undar jurisdiction ol othar aganoias and thosa ol tha City* 3)prasarvation ol uniqua ■oturoi raocureas aa part ol a coonuolty opan apaea systan* and 4)invastigating altamatlva lundlng soureas for thasa lacilitiaa. Thank ) 'U lor your consldaratlon ol ny application, lot no hpQff il t can provida additional inlornation or aoold lika so to attaal any upconing aaatlnga. Plaasa 11 you H. Johnston fhora Driva Hast _ _ __ MB 93364 S39-799S <work> 472*6007 <hoi iM IZ^ % •* ■•. I X CITY OF ORONO ADVISORY BOARD SELECTION PROCESS OTIDBLINES TO STAFF ADOPTED 7/23/90 Th« following represents an outline of a flexible appointments process that the Council has adopted for guidelines to staff and applicants during the selection for vacancies of its various Boards. 1, When a vacancy occurs or when a term is to expire advertisements will be placed in the City's legal newspaper together with other appropriate notification of the impending vacancies. Advertisements will not be regui'.ed for appointments of Chair and vice Chair. 2. Notices will contain a closing date for accepting applications for purposes of administrative ease. The Council by a majority vote can direct further solicitation of people. 3. Applications should be in the iorm of a letter expressing interest and a resume of experience, particularly experience that may be relevant to the position from individuals who are new to the process. Letters of intent will be requested from incumbents. 4. Council ma'^ hold interviews at one Council meeting and may extend the interview period if it desires to a subsequent meeting unless a different process is indicated prior to such interviews. Failure or inability to attend an interview will not result in automatic disqualification. 5. Following the interviews Council will then decide what appointments they desire to make to the various vacancies. l-i-: ^ hr rPv. h- t- il'.' r .V.'. ■i'L- ■ m if’-- ;i- Wfe- V ■'^' '• -' - 1 ^1'tn'. n E-' ■ M: ■ i ■I; i-S:.. ll? !=£'■ iLi: r Jr7mi0Kvr-2 CITY Pott Offic* aox «*Cry««i B*y. Mi ^ ^ * rVi On the Sorth Shore of Lake Minnetonka January 29, 1991 Suaan Wilson 2499 North Shorn Drive Naysata, HN 55391 Oaar Susani On February H» 1991 the Orono Council will be interviewing applicants for the Park Conanission vacancy created by frger*a resignation on December 31r 1990. ■eeause the Council did not have the opportunity to ■srlor to your appointment, they would like to meet and talk t ^u briefly at the February 11# 1990 meeting. The meeting starts at 7s00 p.m. l«t me know if you can attend. I can be reached at 473- 73S7. Sincerely* .A„/f 4 .’ohn X. Gerhardson Public Works Director JXG/lsv mmmmk •ethnp AOMi^evsAnoN ar/ix-enom J (I r* i. C & r l: N>* ll ii'If- t r t;;. ;■ ■'• u i“‘- r* ir I m 'L'tf-!' p.',i W: = >• « • V L J CITY of ORONO Pott Ofliot Bon 66*Cry«tRi Bay. .Miiiaaaota 56323*Moaictpai OOcaa On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka January 30# 1991 St«ph«n Johnston 900 Horth Shore Drive West Hound* MN 55364 Oosr Stephens Recently you submitted a letter of interest to serve on the Orono Perk Coimnission. Th« OroBO Council will b« conducting ins.rviews <=' ‘bat an Februsrv 11# 1991. The meeting starts at 7.00 p.ra. end^it appears as that matter on the agenda may be about 8:00 p.si It there are any questions# please call me at 473-7357 Sincerely# " / ' / y John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director jRQ/tln au.anaiM •r <■? ;• ;■'' I p. hs- Sft’I It fe’ ■I ■% sw rr [t'' >- % W‘m: CITY of ORONO Po«t Offic* Bo* 66«Cry«*» Boy, MinoMOU 55323 •Muniapol OfOew iH< inui:On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka January 30, 1991 jaMS Andorson 2280 Fox Stroot Long Lako# MM 55356 Oaar Jins *«c.ntly you .ubmitt.d a letter of intereat to aerve on the Offono fark Conmiaxione Th. Orono council -ill be uSoT«. Kd'itVp« *» « p.n If there ate any queationa, pleaae call me at 473-7357 Sincerelyr / John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director JKO/tln 1 m PVSUC .4i%rm i-li' - p 'i; !1 ’T i Li/ 'I •, i' ,’:i' i % ¥■ ‘ *.-■ Ik, k' \ 1^' S' ¥ |;.ft. . ;i« INcr b d CITYofOROXO Pom Offlo* Bos 66«CryMoi Bay. Mioiuaeu 55323oMaaidpat OOem On the N^rth Shore of Lake Minnetonka January 30, 1991 8h«rok«« ZlB« 3630 BilMn Street Maple Plain, MN 55350 Dear Sherokee: Recently you submitted a letter of interest to serve on the Orone Park Commission. The Orono Council will be conducting interviews poaltion on Fobrunry 11, 1991. The mnating »‘»^*» ** !,‘®° .P;",; and It appaais aa that mattar on the agenda may be about 8.00 pe0e Xf there are any questions, please call me at 473-7357. Sincerely, ^ . 0 • • John R. Gerhardson. Public Works Director JRO/tln ■U'dMtW u r I 1 i I I-rI' :r w r »r ''I:' IE :i4f irifi CITY of OROX I Post Offiot Bos 6S*Cryaiai Boy. MiansooU 55323 • Moiiidpol OOco* On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka January 30, 1991 Tina Whit# ■ox S2 Crystal Bay» MN 55323 Oaar Tinat Racantly you submitted a letter of interest to serve on the Orono Park Commission. Tha Orono Council will be conducting interviews b/.bcut s=oo p.m jf thara are any guestions, please call me at 473 7357. Sincerely, a V / r, John R. Gerhardson. Public Works Director JlO/tln M-nsant , • % :|V i--u [':y- f.;-;'M' El &||i.vm- |i. I 1^ ■i-' r PARK COMNISSICm ATTBHDA1IC8 RECORD POR 1990 K«lley Vongries Erger Kolcal Bradley Flint Gilbert Wilson* 1/2/90 2/5/90 2/9/90 3/€/90 4/3/90 5/1/90 0/5/90 7/10/90 8/7/90 9/12/90 10/2/90 11/5/90 12/2/90 N N N y y y y y Y M y y N M N y y Y Y y Y Y N y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y M Y N Y Y Y N Y N Y Y N Y N * Susan Wilson was appointed as of 6/5/90. Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y N N Y Y I I •p IfeV/'-fe.. % fv;'' 2191.2 •b PARK COMMISSION RESPONSIBILITIES Th« Park Commission meets monthly Th« Park Commission is charged with considering the existing and continuing needs of the City of Orono parks and recreation areas and facilities of all kinds including, but not limited to. Lake Minnetonka and its shoreline. This includes both active and passive park facilities. The Park Commission shall use the Comprehensive Management ?lan as a guide and be an advisory body to the City Council, when plana reflect changes in the Comprehensive Plan they shall conduct appropriate liasion with the Planning Commission. The Park Commission shall upon request indicate whether they recommend dedication of land or cash in lieu of land for new subdivision. They shall also recommend any easements or requested dedication for the City's Bike/Hike Trail. 13091.3 7 TO: PROM: DATS: "ayoi: and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administraton January 30, 1991 ^0 5<nBJECT: Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission Appointments Attachment: A. Appointments Memo Dated 1/9/91 ISSUE - Selection of an individual from either the Council or the public to serve as member (s) to the Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission. INTRODUCTION - At the Council's January 14, 1991 Council meeting appointments were made to most of the positions, however, three of the positions that were not filled were those of the Cable Commission. it was directed that this be tabled until appointment of a new CounciImember. DISCUSSION - Based on interest of current CounciImembers or that of others the Council may have either interviewed or knows generally might have an interest they may appoint two primaries and one alternate that Orono is allowed under the joint franchise agreement to have on the Board. ALTERNATIVES - 1. Council indicate their interest in either serving as primaries ur alternates. 2. Select to request others to fill in vacancies. 3. Table for further discussion. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that persons on the Council indicate interest they may have in this and that if others are needed for the position, that staff be directed to inquire as to their lavel of interest in service on the Commission and that it be tabled until the Council's February 25, 1991 Council meeting. PROPOSED MOTION appoint seconded by that the Council- Moved by _, _ and to the Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission foi 1991. Ayes _, Nays S' 1390.3 4 vV>* FIIOMs DATBt t t., !■> F'r 4'' I’ I- # ♦ rv: Mayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administratoj^. January 9, 1991 t , SUBJECT 1991 Appointments Attachment!A. 1990 Appointments B. Proposed 1991 Appointments Resolution C. Advisory Board - Expiration of Terms Dated 12/7/90 ISSUE - Adoption of appointments for 1991. INTRODUCTION - Annually the Council, at the beginning of the year, appoints its designees to certain Boards etc. with the Planning Commission appointments being done during the March timeframe for an effective appointment date of April 1. DISCUSSION - Park Commission - Currently the City is seeking applicants for the Park Commission with a deadline of January 22nd. These will be brought to Council at the January 28th meeting. As the Chair and Vice Chair was appointed just last spring you may desire to continue those for 1991. As for the general appointments after a review with Mayor Peterson the following changes are proposed from the 1990 appointments: Weed Inspector - Barbara Peterson Cable TV Committee - Delete « Barbara Peterson (per mayoral request) - Alan Nettles • James Grabek Mayor's Association - Barbara Peterson Westonka Senior Citizens - Barbara Peterson Additionally the Highway 12 Committees have been added to the resolution and placing Barbara Peterson's name as the primary appointee on the Policy Committee. Vacancies exist in the following positions: Acting Mayor Cable TV Committee - 2 "primary" and an alternate West Hennepin Human Services - Alternate ALTERNATIVES - I 1. Adopt the resolution in total. 2. Adoption of those that are unanimous. 3. Table the entire resolution. 4. Table those that are not unanimous. ! i'P • ! . 5. Take no action. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that apart from vacancies that you may desire to fill either now or at a future meeting and a separate vote on Acting Mayor, that the balance of the list be adopted as proposed. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded _, appoint _ _ as the Acting Mayor for 1991. Ayes that the Council __, Nays __. Moved by __, seconded , that the Council adopt Resolution # setting forth the appofntments for 1991. Ayes , Nays Uf- QRQNO City of OROINC RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING SELECTED APPOINTMENTS FOR THE TEAR 1990 BB IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesotar that th« appointments and designations for the year 1990 are as follows: BPPOXHTMBNT/DBSIGNATI ON Acting Mayor Planning Commission Rep. to Council Park Commission Chairman Park Commission 3 year term Park Commi.'.sion 1 year terra Rapresantat.ive to Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Representative to Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Legislative Liaison AMM ANM Legislative Contract Lead Attorney City Attorney Firm Alternate Attorney Lead Engineer City Engineering Firm Auditor riaeal Agents Insurance Agent of Record Official Newspaper Official Depositories/ Investment Vendors r.. 1990 Edward Callahan Alternate Philip Bradley Bruce Kokal Lee Erger JoEllen Hurr Mark Bernhardson Mark Bernhardson J. Diann Goetten Tom Barrett Popham# Haik, Schnobrich, Kaufaran and Doty William Soth, Dorsey & Whitney Glenn Cook BonestroOf Rosene# Anderlik and Associates Pannell, Kerr, Forster Ehlers & Associates Duweyn P. Carlson Apple Valley Insurance The Laker and Pioneer Newspaper First National Banks of: The Lakes (Navarre) Wayzata Minneapolis St. Paul Wayzata Bank & Trust Company Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc. Marquette Bank, Minneapolis American National Bank & Trust Company of St. Paul First Minnesota FSB, .Mound League of MN Cities - 4M Fund Norwest Bank Minneapolis Twin City Federal Savings ( Loan Piper, Jaffray ( Hopwood, Mpls. Dain Bostrorth, Inc., .Mpls. VitOm 1 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO._ t ^ APP0IMmENT/DBSI6NATI0N Official Depositories/ Continued Investment Vendors Weed Inspector Assistant Weed Inspector Transportation Committee Bmargency Preparedness Director Southwest Sanitary Sewer District Suburban Health Nursing Service Cable TV Committee (2 plus Alternate) West Hennepin Recycling Commission Hayor*s Association Suburban Rate Authority West* Tonka Senior Citizens Minnesota Police Recruiting System West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board (2 plus Alternate) Building Code Board of Appeals r 1990 Colonial Nat'l Bank, Willmington, DE North Fork Bank & Trust Co, New York Nat'l Bank of Washington, D.C. Commerce Bank, Virginia Beach, VA M. H. Novick & Co. Inc., Mpls., MN Bear, Stearns & Co, New York, N.V. Hon Fed Bank, FSB, Costa Mesa, CA Com Fed Savings Bank, Lowell, MA Western Fed S&L, Marina Del Ray, CA Southwest Savings Assn., Dallas, TX Caprock Savings & Loan, Lubbock, TX Mera Bank, Phoenix, AZ Far West S&L, Newport Beach, CA Capitol Federal S&L, Aurora, CA Topa Thrift & Loan, Los Angeles, CA First Federal S&L, Raleigh, NC Westport Savings Bank, Hanford, CA Sherman Oaks Bank FSB, Sherman Oaks, CA Great American 1st Savings, Scottsdale, AZ St. Edmunds S&L, Philadelphia, PA James R. Grabek John Gerhardson John Gerhardson Melvin Kilbo Mark Bernhardson Mark Bernhardson Barbara Peterson Alan Nettles James R. Grabek (Alternate) John Gerhardson James R. Grabek John Gerhardson Mark Bernhardson (Alternate) James R. Grabek Melvin Kilbo Gary Cheswick (Alternate) LaDean McWilliams Marc McCabe (Alternate) Steve Anderson, Mtka Fire Inspec. Tom Anderson, Hopkins Bldg Offic. Maureen Bellows, AIA Architect Jim Hanson, Builder Theodore Paulfranz, Edina Fire Ch. (IF_, QRaNO City of OROIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _________ AVPOXaniBHT/DBSIGHATZON 1990 Mvtlopment Committee Hennepin Emergency Communications Organization Public Works Director City Engineer Building & Zoning Administrator Mark Bernhardson Melvin Kilbo (Alternate) Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held Januay 8, 1990. ATTEffi: Mayor ~h~>, allin. City ClerK I 'fA I' ■f ¥L-** J ;r: A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING SELECTED APPOINTMENTS FOR THE YEAR 1991 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota that the appointments and designations for the year 1991 are as follows: APBOINTNENT/DESIGNATION Acting Mayor Planning Commission Rep. to Council Park Commission Chair Representative to Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Representative to Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Legislative Liaison Ai!!! AMM Legislative Contact Lead Attorney City Attorney Firm Alternate Attorney Lead Engineer City Engineering Firm Auditor Fiscal Agents Insurance Agent of Record Official Newspaper Official Depositories/ Investment Vendors 1991 Alternate JoEllen Hurr Mark Bernhardson Mark Bernhardson J. Diann Goetten Tom Barrett Popham, Haik, Schnobrich, Kaufman and Doty William Both, Dorsey & Whitney Glenn Cook BonestroOf Rosene Anderlik and Associates Pannell, Kerr, Forstec Ehlers & Associates Duweyn P. Carlson Apple Valley Insurance The Laker and Pioneer Newspaper First National Banks of: The Lakes (Navarre) Wayzata Minneapolis St. Paul Wayzata Bank & Trust Company Marquette Bank, Minneapolis American National Bank 6 Trust Company of St. Paul League of MN Cities - 4M Fund Norwest Bank Minneapolis Twin City Federal Savings & Loan Piper, Jeffrey & Hopwooo, Mpis. Dain Bosworth, Inc., Kpls Prudential>Bache, Npls APPOIHTMBMT/DBSIGIIATION Official Dapoaitories/Continued Invastment Vandors Naad Inspector Assistant Weed Inspector Transportation Committee Baargancy Preparedness Director Southwest Sanitary Sewer District Suburban Health Nursing Service Cable TV Coaaittee (2 Plus Alternate) west Hennepin Recycling Commission Mayor's Association Suburban Rate Authority Meat Tonka Senior Citizens Minnesota Police Recruiting System West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board (2 Plus Alternate) Building Code Board of Appeals Development Committee Hennepin Emergency Communications Organization 1991 Maryland Nat'l Bank, Baltimore, MD Franklin Savings Bank, Ottowa, KS North Fork Bank & Trust Co, New York Commerce Bank, Virginia Beach, VA Hon Fed Bank, FSB, Costa Mesa, CA Connecticut Bank & Trust, Hartford, CT Columbia 1st Bank, FSB, Arlington, VA (Wash D.C. Branch) Chase Manhattan Bank, New York, NY Barbara Peterson John Gerhardson John Gerhardson Police Chief Mark Bernhardson Mark Bernhardson (Alternate) John Gerhardson Barbara Peterson John Gerhardson Mark Bernhardson (Alternate) Barbara Peterson Police Chief Gary Cheswick (Alternate) LaDean McWilliams David Use (Alternate) Steve Anderson, Mtka Fire Inspec. Tom Anderson, Hopkins Bldg Offic. Maureen Bellows, AIA Architect Jim Hanson, Builder Theodore Paulfranz, Edina Fire Ch. Public Works Director City Engineer Building & Zoning Administrator Mark Bernhardson Police Chief (Alternate) r APPOINTNBNT/DBSI6HATI0N 1991 North Tonka Crime Prevention Coalition Board of Directors Highway 12 Appointments: Policy Co»taiittee Police Chief (5/9/93) Barbara Peterson (5/9/93) Technical Committee Citizens Committee Adopted by the City Council of regular meeting held January 14, Barbara Peterson Mark Bernhardson (Alternate) John Gerhardson J. Diann Goetten George Johnson Eleanor Winston John Massopust (Alternate) the City of Orono, Minnesota, 1991.at a ATTESTi Fiarbara A. Peterson, Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, city clerk 1= 12790 7" Cl TO: FBOM: Mayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson, City Ad.T.inistrato!fi DATE:December 7, 1990 SUBJECT: Advisorv Board - Expiration of Terns The following terms expire in the first 3 months of 1991: Park Conission Richard Flint (Chair) Lee Erger James Gilbert Susan Wilson 12/31/90 12/31/90 12/31/90 12/31/90 All but Mr. Erger have expressed interest in continuing as Park Commission members. Planaing Commission James Hanson At Large Ed Cohen At Large 03/31/91 03/31/91 Staff will advertise for the Park positions in the next couple weeks. For the Planning Commission it will be done early in February. Others expiring the end of 1991: Park Commission Alex Vongries Philip Bradley Lester Kelley 12/31/91 12/31/91 12/31/91 LNCD JoEllen Hurr 12/31/91 West Hennepin Homan Services LaOean McWilliams 12/31/91 FROM: DATS: Mayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson, City Ad.xinistratd February S, 1991 J. ; . ^ JL . •< SOBJECT: LMCD Comprehensive ?lan Attachment: A. Memo on L***.CD 1/24/91 (.Memo Only) B. LMCD/Draft Letter on Comp Plan C. Weekly News Article 1/31/91 ISSUE - Update Council on the following issues: A. Status of LMCD’s plan B. Attorney's opinion regarding: a. ) Length of terra b. ) Authority of City related to shoreland regulations INTRODUCTION - As noted in Attachment A, LMCD authorized their dhairman to request a 90 day extension for review of their plan to Metropolitan Council contingent upon their receiving meditation assistance from Metro Council. Which they, Metro Council had offered. To date we have received no further information from LMCD as to when they would like to sit down to further discuss modifications to their proposal with either Orono as an Individual city, with the cities in opposition or with all the cities around the lake. As noted in Attachment C L.MCD apparently holds little hope of resolving issues with Orono. DIL^nsSION - At the Council's January 28, 199 1 meeting Council further outlined two issues that they woulcJ like to have the City Attorney explore which are: A. The term of appointment for LMCD representatives. B. Approval authority the cities have in relation to shoreland regulations. He is currently conducting the research. ALTERNATIVES - 1. Accept the information. 2. Request additional information. 3. Table for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION - Pending determination of the structure for consideration of the plan by the LMCD it is requested the item be tabled until at least the Council's Febraury 28, 1991 Council meeting. PROPOSED MEETING > Moved by seconded by Council table further discussion of this item until its February 25, 1991 Council meeting. Ayes __, Nays __. cct JoEl.len Burr, LMCD Representative V L: * f il Tot Frost .natot Mayor Peterson & Orono Council Members Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrat^^^\^ January 24, 1991 Subjectt L.M.C.D. Comprehensive Plan - Shoreland Regulations ATTACHMENT - A - LMCD Shoreland Regulation dated 1/9/91 (memc only) B - Metropolitan Council Memo dated 1/15/91 C - LMCD 1/23/91 Motion Re: LMCD Comprehensive Plan ISSUE - TT Present to .'■ouncil updated information that in the progress of LMCD's comprehensive plan. 2.Determine from Council steps they may desire to take at this juncture in light of those events. INTRODUCTION - At the Council’s last meeting Attachment A was presented outlining the results of the January 8, 1991 Metropolitan Council Systems Committee hearing. Attachment B was trensmitted in advance of that Committee's January 22, 1991 meeting. In the interim between Council meetings. Council member Callahan and Jabbour together with myself met with LMCD on January 16, 1991. This discussion, represented a "firm and frank exchange of views*. Among those was the reiteration of Orono's position that it did not feel that LMCD should be involved in the shoreland and that substantial changes would be needed to be made to the comprehensive plan in order to gain Orono's -upport. Present at that meeting, in addition to the above listed representatives were Orono's LMCD representative JoEllen Hurr; Gene Strommen, Executive Director of the LMCD? David Cochran, LMCD representative from Greenwood; Jim Grathwol, LMCD representative from Excelsior; together with Steve Preston, a consultant that the LMCD is looking to aid them in their implementation of the comprehensive plan. DI8C088I0M - As noted in the Metropolitan Council's staff report (Attachment B), they recommended the Metro Systems Committee suspend LMCD's plan for a period of up to 6 months in order to work out differences in that plan that a majority of cities may have with the plan. It was additionally recommended that if the problems cannot be resolved between the communities and the LMCD, Metro Council would not attempt to resolve them, but would refer them to the next session of the Legislature in order to resolve them. At their January 22, 1991, the Metro Council's Systems Committee, after extensive discussion, voted to tentatively approve the plan contingent on resolving issues with the other cities. L.M.C.D. Comprehensive Plan January 22, 1991 Page 2 of 3 - Shoreland Regulations Subsequent to the meeting, Metro Council's legal staff was unsure that such a disposition was possible. As such, this may be again reviewed at the Committee's Tuesday, February 5, 1991 meeting. At the LMCD's January 23, 1991 meeting they decided that Instead of granting Metro Council the requested 2 week extension, that they request a 90 day suspension on the matter at Metro Council subject to a Metro Council person to assist the resolution process. This may however not mean that the only "action" on this plan will be discussions between LMCD and the cities. There has been legislative interest in this plan and selected Legislators may attempt to introduce legislation relative to Lake Minnetonka based in part on this plan or their own agendas. Reasons for further work between LMCD and the cities include not only the disagreement between communities related to the plan, but also the changing political context with a new Metro Council Chair together with anticipated change in a half of Metro Council members in the next 6 months. Additionally, changes in the gubernatorial office together with the Commissioner of Natural Resources and shift of a DNR staff member to a new position in the soil and water resources may have an impact as to the DNR's position and/or approach related to shoreland. Shoreland Regulations - Staff continues to work on a draft of Shoreland Regulations including issues specifically related to marinas and what changes the City desires to undertake regarding their future control. Discussion of these directives would be helpful in the upcoming session(s) with Council and Planning Commission on the Shoreland Regulations. In the meantime staff is assembling for transmittal to LMCD the City concerns related to each marina, particularly as to dock extensions. It will request LMCO respond in their licensing process to these issues. ALTERNATIVES - 1. 2. Accept the information. Direct Council and staff members reoarding further work with the LMCD. 3. 4. Table. Take no action. L.N.C.D. Comprehensive Plan - Shoreland Regulations January 22, 1991 Page 3 of 3 RECOMMENDATION - Accept the information and table to February 11, 1991 if no further action is needed. — r*' I,::- I' tf; PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by , seconded by accept the information related to the LMCD. Ayes that Council , nays _ _ CCI JoEIlen Hurr, Orono LMCD Representative Gene Strommen, Executive Director of LMCD Jeanne Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator 13091. j I ddflil' Mr. Eugene R. Strommen, Executive Director Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 900 East Lake Street Wayzata, MN 55391 Subject: LMCD's Comprehensive Plan Dear Gene, During the 90 day period that LMCD has requested the Metro Council place its plan in a hold status, the City of Orono would like to again reiterate its position related to the plan. This letter is in addition to and not preemptive of previous comments on the plan. , It is the desire of the City of Orono that LMCD remain within its original charge and not transform the organization as envisioned in the plan to an organization that has agendas and constituencies that are no longer shared by at least the majority of the cities around the lake. Specific areas of comment on the plan include: Shoceland - It is Orono's position that any reference to LMCD being involved in the shoreland area be deleted. At most the plan should only indicate the regulations and objectives set forth in the plan are a model, that has DNR acceptance and that the cities then individually deal with DNR in further developing their regulations. It is additionally requested that LMCD also support the cities individual grant requests to DNR for the monies that were originally earmarked for the cities through LMCD. (To the extent that LMCD can engender the support of a cooperative effort by all fourteen communities around the lake to jointly work with DNR, it may be worth exploring a joint powers agreeemnt of the 14 cities to outline the terms under which that would be done.) Surface Use Management - The City of Orono «K>uld again encourage change in the emphasis of the plan so that the first priority is handling the existing safety problems on the lake before allowing additional access growth on the lake. Further that the emphasis be changed so that the tools be pro-active and be put in place prior to allowing further growth in access. The City of Orono again encourgages the establishment of a standard density for the lake beyond which no growth would be allowed. While it has been argued that the literature would not support establishment of any standard, it is no different than many of the standards set forth in DNR shoreland regulations. No specific literature supports the precise standards selected. This is also true for many of the city's land use standards. However, the policy decision has been made by t.he policy boards which have considered them to be reasonable in light of the various factors. Finally the City still urges that Li'.CD further explore regulation by type of craft and inclusion of the ongoing survey methodology as an appendix. Board Sturcture - Based not only on Orono's continued opposition to an alteration to the Board, but now to the apparent reluctance of Suburban Hennepin Parks and Metro Council to participate as Board members, that the plan be amended to retain the Boards original composition. If any alteration is appropriate, the Board should look at amending the composition of the Board to more accurately reflect the financial contribution and/or shoreline on the Board. The City additionally supports provisions to stagger the terms and allow for re-call of representatives. Funding Structure - The City of Orono encourages that LMCD not further pursue, and in fact delete from their plan, broading of taxing authority independent of the cities. Orono would also like the budgeting process be clarified so that cities have a date by which they can express objections to proposed budgets before final adoption of that budget. Additionally, the City of Orono in line with its support of LMCD as it was originally concieved would continue to encourage minimal staff for the board to only conduct existing powers in an effective manner. Role of Plan - Orono again requests that LMCD include in their plan the status that this plan has been given by not only LMCD, but Metro Council and other agencies and f-J <>:V that their roles be specifically defined within the plan to include the following: A. Sections over which of the various agencies specifically have review and/or approval authority. B. The process for review and amendment by LMCD and to the extent required other governmental bodies. C. Specifically address the relation of LMCD actions to the comprehensive plan and how inconsistencies are determined together with how any inconsistencies are to be resolved. We remain open for further discussion either on a one to one basis# on the basis of the eight cities with whom we are joined in expressing our opposition or with all the cities that compose LMCD. We await your answer, on behalf of the Orono City Council. Sincerely, Mark E. Bernhardson City Administrator cc: Mayor and city Council JoEllen Hurr, LMCD Representative l\^0evr Cl Unu^31.|99l WEEKLYNeWS I Lon^tenn Lake plan is on hold At request of Met Council, LMCD will continue to talk with its cities Dr Jotaaibea White While “tenucively” endorsing the re- «Mtly adopted long>tenn mai:agement l^an for Lake Minnetonka, proposed by ^ f Minnetonka Conservaaon Dis- •tet (LMCD). a comnuoee of the Metro- Council has defeired action ui an eflon to get more LMCD member cides la **huy into” the pian. A Met Council staff anaiysis of the daeunMnt, completed last April after a las^year process and approved by the taam in October on an 8-1 vote w itb two abawMions. found the plan to be ~con- aMtasT with council’s MetropoUtan De- eatapnent Guide, but concluded the UlCXXi ’’inability to implement those gaals interferes with the orderly and eco- ■amic development of a major resource Iw the metropolitan area^" As areeult. tho council's systenu com* iMMa, at a raaedng last week in SL Paul fShUMted the LMCD grant a six-month anention lor council action on the plan hi an aflort to rtach agreement with those Mttae ftiU oppoaad to the plan. Although ym pi— was approved by the L&ICD hawA tho city councils of eight of the LMCXPt 14 member cities have taken a paaMoa in opposition to the plan. At its monthly meetingi held Jan 22. a LMCD board rtiuctamly granted the _ ^ m m MBAMlMMBih cmaMion* but members con- plan. “They <Met Council staff) want to see us resolve our differences with the (eight) ciUes.” LMCD Chair David Coch­ ran reported to the board. The sycteras committee has offered staff assistance to “faciliute" agreement between the LMCD and the dissenting ciues. As a result of discussions Cochran and other LMCD officials have iniuaied with those cities. Cochran reported that the City of Spring Park appears ready to accept the plan but gave up hope of being able to reach an agreement with the City of Orono. It after the si-x-monlh delay, agree­ ment between the LMCD and the ernes !S not reached, the Met Council committee proposes to refer the issue to the State Legislature. An 11-point “sutement of findings’* prepared by the Met Council staff con­ cluded that while the LMCD met Uie council's direenve to compiete the man­ agement plan within a two-year penod. the LMCD “has not met the final direc- ove of the council—to bring the ades and other responsible agencies together to seek a memorandum of understanding that clarifies and simplifies the man­ agement structure for the Lake." “The lack of a memorandum of under" standing jeopardires implementation of the LMCD management plan and makes i fl^'line'hit duriniK rings, wut da^er was sU^t "AeMiac to BopUM XnflMwng LMCD From Page 1 ;t ineffecuve m proiecung the qualit>' of the Lake and in providing public access* the staff memo concludes. The report found fault with the pian s proposed management stnicturc. The repon notes that the piaa “retains a cit­ izen* based membership which has not worked weU for the preparauon of the management plan, because the cities either have not given their represenia* nves a clear charge or have not exer ­ cized sufficient oversight over their representatives.** The report further notes, ‘•the language in the pian u not ciear and has led to inter-relations of the plan oy the cities that differ with the LMCD*s inierpreia- uon of the plan, particuiariy with respect *0 me level of authority' that the LMCD ••til exercis e or will s eek to exercise** and caLs for the rewnung of the pian to “eli- rrunate confusing and unclear language. Excelsioi^s reoresenuuve. Jim Grath- wol a member of the LMCD advisory commrnee responsible for drawing up the olan. was clearly unhappy by the p^ siaon of the Metropolitan Council’s systems coaimiciee According to GrathwoL the LMCD“has busted Its gills to dc the work of the council for two years, but they have failed to back us up. They agree that we have done what they asked us to do.** Grath- wol continued, **but they are whimpmg out on us. itotn i br^tk in a eat Une be- and ‘•there was no imminent danger to 2691.5 TOt FROM: DATE: 4 A..ayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato'j^^^^ February 6, 1991 SUBJECT: LMCD Representative C/fy i9tl Just a note to let you know, JoEllen Hurr^ill be available to discuss LMCD items at this agenda item. (She will be attending a portion of the Minnetonka Beach Council meeting first.) 13091.5 ; z'TO; Mayor and City Council PBOM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administratoi^ DATC: January 30, 1991 SUBJECT: Lake Use Management and Shoreland Regulations s Attachment: A. Draft Letter to Lake Minnetonka Conservation District - Marinas B. Gaffron Memo - Commerical License Memo for 1990/91 C. Resolution Request for Funding - DMR 0 ISSUE 1. Determine if Council desires to transmit its particular concerns regarding marinas to be included by LMCD during their consideration of marina licensing for 1991. 2. Determine whether Council desires to submit an independent funding request to the Department of Natur.nl Resources for a grant in relationship to shoreland regulations. INT ROD UCTION - In a recent discussion CounciImember Jabbour outlinedhis concerns regarding the City's marinas and in particular the length of current dock extensions. In an effort to address those concerns on marinas Attachment A was drafted to be included in LMCD's regular licensing process. DISCUSSION - ININAS fhere has been ongoing concern regarding the marinas and their growth, or potential for growth, and how the City may address it. It is anticipated that the Council in conjunction with consultation with the Planning Commission will over the next year decide how they want to approach several of the lakeshore issues including what authorities they can and desire to exert on marinas. The City of Orono has felt the LMCD, as originally constituted, should focus on those areas given in their original enabling legislation. As an interim measure it would be appropriate for the City to send a letter to LMCD outlining the City's concerns particularly as they relate to temporary dock extensions and have LMCD respond to those during their licensing process. It is not the intent to signal to LMCD that in the future the City may not extend whatever authority it may have and choose to exercise by presenting them a letter at this time. GRANT REQUEST - When originally made aware of LMCD's grants it •** expectation that the City of Orono could work through LMCD to obtain a grant. As the Comprehensive Plan went forward, the City's disagreements with that grew. Unless there is substantial amendAdht to LMCD's approach, the City of Orono indicated they would go separately in developing their shoreland regulations. Given the progress of the LriCD plan and the lack of change it would be appropriate at this point for the City to proceed separately. As a result it may be worth submitting Attachment B as a request for funding. At this time while the money has been "designated for Orono through LMCD" the DNR may choose to deny the request based on either: - Timeliness of the request. - Taking the position that monies are only available through LMCD. Once submitted the City will deal to a degree with DNR on the request. If a denial is forthcoming, it is appropriate to determine how far to push the denial for an approximate maximum of $5,000. ALTERNATIVES Letter to LMCD - 1. Direct the letter be sent. 2. Amend and direct it be sent. 3. Table for further discussion. 4. Direct staff not to undertake. 5. Take no action. Request for funding • 1. Adopt resolution. 2. Table for further discussion. 3. Direct no further action be taken. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that - 1. Council after making any comments direct staff to send a letter to LMCD. 2. That the Council adopt the resolution requesting funding from DNR. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, Council directs staff to send a letter to LMCD regarding its concerns on the 1991 marina licensing, that it adopt resolution __ requesting funding from DNR on shoreland regulations. Ayes , Nays I CCS Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator JoEllen Hurr, LMCD Representative 1309 t r-: : is- Mr. Eugene R. Strommen, Executive Director Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 900 East Lake Street Wayzata, MN 55391 Subject: 1991 Marina Licensing Dear Gene, Recently the City of Orono received notice of licensing for the various commercial marinas within the City of Orono. It is requested by the City of Orono this year that as you go through the licensing process for these marinas, the following concerns be responded to during this process: General Concerns - A. Temporary "dock extensions" - It is our understanding that for the last year and a half the marinas, some more than others, have been granted specific extensions of their docks and mooring facilities to accommodate low water problems. In at least one case, it is our understanding, that the docks have gone from 200 to 600 feet out. It is requested that these temporary dock permits be carefully monitored so that removal occurs when the excess length is no longer needed. Further, we request that appropriate action be taken so that there is no chance that individual marinas, because of :he extended nature of these temporary permits, can leg^tly leverage themselves into greater dock limits in the future when the water has returned to its normal level. As you may be aware, the City of Orono and LMCD went to Court with North Star Marina back in the *70's to reduce its docks from 300* to a 200* limit. B. It is additionally requested that any changes that relate to land use as far as services offered, alteration of parking, landscaping, etc. be first referred back to the City of Orono for their review prior to any initial consideration of the operating licenses. It should be noted the City of Orono is considering, as it reviews its shoreland regulations, what additional regulation it would desire related to marinas. This will be reviewed in context with the level of jurisdiction and enforcement LMCD '• W ■r' •6-i' r f:. :=Ikf:-:- It*'m already has in this area. Specific Orono Land Use/Zoning Requirements - Eased on the assumption that# per LMCD Section 2.03 Subd. 2(e), LMCD in their licensing process requires that the licensee must meet all LMCD requirements as well as all the requirements of c local government (with the most restrictive applying) we would like to inform you of the following ongoing issues the City of Orono has with specific marinas, as follows: 1. North Shore Drive Marina A. Encroachment into an adjacent dock area, residential ly zoned f^illard property east of marina. B. The 1991 LMCD license application indicates an increase in boats over and above the number historically licensed by Orono. The last license that was issued by Orono (1984} was for 76 rental slips, 6 transient slips, 4 company slips, 20 boats dry stacked and 45 boats stored for sale or service with a maximum density of 151 total. Apparently since 1988, North Shore Drive Marina has been given an LMCD license fo> . total of 165 boats. 2. Lakeside Marina A. The City has received complaints about the condition and status of the floating dock extensions. The complainant was referred to the LMCD. B. A 1985 variance review for limited comraerical use of non-adjacent lakeshore lots owned by the marina, has left unresolved issues of boat storage on and off land, as well as parking and related land use issues. C. The City originally was in support of the applicants previous west side dock layout because it limited impact on the affected neighboring property owner, however, the new dock layout per the LMCD plan has not resulted in recent complaints f; t & I from that neighbor. 3. Gayles Marina A. The City has advised the marina owner that operation of a dredging business is not a permitted use in the B-2 zone. B. The City has not license Gayles Marina since 1981 due to unresolved issues of required rip-rap, sediment control measures, a disagreement about whether 9 service slips should be allowed and issues of screening and plantings. To the extent that existing violations or proposed changes impact land use it is requested that licensees be referred to Orono prior to granting of an LMCD license. If you have questions regarding specifics, please contact Michael Gaffron Sincerely, Mark E. Bernhardson City Administrator w TOS From Date: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator January 29, 1991 Subject: Commercial Marina Licenses for 1990/1991 Commercial Marina License Renewal Application forms for the 1991 season have not been mailed out, pending direction from the City Council. Although marina license applications for 1990 were received from all marina operations except for Crystal Bay Service, 1990 licenses have never been issued. If the City intends to continue licensing, the 1991 licenses could be retroactive to 1/1/90. The 1990 license review got lost in the shuffle of discussions about the LMCD Lake Management Plan. Council minutes from April 23, 1990 indicate Council generally supported the idea of a marina committee. No marina committee was ever formed, however. Council did form a committee to review the LMCD plan. Since the mid-1980s, the City has not exercised concurrent jurisdiction with the LMCD regarding dock issues associated with marinas. The City has continued an active role in regulating the land use aspects of marina operations, carefully reviewing requests and granting the appropriate variances for marina upgrades at Windward Marina, Minnetonka Boat Works, and Smith's Bay Marina. Although our marina licensing fees have been based on the number of slips, the City has generally exerted its authority only over the land, not the water. Marina Activity late - The following is a summary of marina activity over the last few years: 1. Windward Marina - 118 slips - Windward Marine is nearing completion of the two-phase renovation involving replacement of buildings. Phase one, completed in 1989, involved removal of a steel storage building on the east side of Shoreline Drive, replacing that structure with parking spaces, green space, and a gazebo/toilet building. Phase two on the Tanager Lake side, involves construction of a new showroom/retail sales structure, which is nearly complete. The final step in this renovation will be the removal of the old showroom building, landscaping, and replacement of parking spaces. The City has received no complaints regarding the operation of this marina. I hrr-*-'r f ■ X Commercial Marina Licenses 1990/91 January 29, 1991 Page 2 of 4 2. Minnetonka Boat Works - 198 9 increase in slips from 7 0 to 114 - During 1989/1990 Minnetonka Boat Works was approved by the LMCD for additional slips on Tanager Lake, and the Orono Council approved the creation of additional parking spaces on the Brown's Bay side of the road, which have been constructed. It should be noted that this upgrade also resulted in the striping of a crosswalk location serving both Windward Marina and the Boat Works operations, with the intent to define a crossing point for pedestrian traffic. The City has received no complaints regarding the Minnetonka Boat Works operation. 3. Minnetonka Marina and Yacht Club (formerly Smith's Bay Marina, formerly Paul's Landing) - 79 slips - This marina had very little activity during 1990, there currently being few amenities except the docks. The property has been sold to Maurice J. Wagener, with David J. Carlson currently the General Manager. The new property owners have indicated to the City staff an intent to proceed with a club building similar to that which had previously been approved by the Council for the previous owner. Nr. Toberman. Staff is under the impression that the current owners will be propos ng a two-story building, and might proceed with the review process this year. The City did recently issue a permit for limited maintenance repairs of the existing garage structure (partial re-siding). This building is being used as the temporary marina office until the new building can be constructed. The City has received no specific complaints, but many inquiries regarding the status of this marina. As lake levels return to normal, we would expect this marina operation to again become viable. 4. North Shore Drive Marina - 1984 license: 88 slips, 28 dry stacks; 1991 LMCD application: 93 slips, 72 dry stacks - North Shore Drive Marina was last licensed by the City in 1984. A number of issues (some resolved, some not) since 1984 include: a) encroachment into adjacent dock use areas; b) authorized/un-authorized dredging (DNR/LMCD); c) expansion of marina operation onto adjacent residentially zoned properties; and d) apparent increase of slips and dry stack units (1991). V, Commercial Marina Licenses 1990/91 January 29, 1991 Page 3 of 4 5. Lakeside Marina (formerly Maxwell Bay Marina, formerly Chaska Marina, formerly Northstar Marina) - 76 slips - This marina has changed hands a number of times and is currently again owned by Jim Dunn, During 1990, the City received verbal complaints regarding stability ot the extended floating docks which were allowed on a temporary basis by the LMCD due to low water conditions. Thes® docks also necessitated dredging a channel to the existing ramp at the shoreline. The Marina as of October 1990 was apparently not in compliance with all LMCD regulations. Through the years the following have also been issues regarding this marina: a) dock layout related to its effect on neighboring properties; and b) expansion of the marina use into adjacent and non- adjacent neighboring properties. We had one complaint in 1990 regarding a property at 3262 North Shore Drive renting out slips, that may have been unrelated to this marina depending on the ownership at the time. 6. Gayles Marina - 143 slips - Gayles Marina has not been licensed by the City since 1981. Licenses for 1982 through 1985 were withheld subject to compliance with a number of conditions which have never been fully met. These include: a) provision of specific sediment control measures in association with rip**rapping done in 1988; b) an issue of 9 service slips at the shoreline; c) screening/planting. In recent years, Gayles Marina has been in trouble with the DNR and the LMCD regarding dredging and the apparent operation of a dredging business. The City has corresponded with the owner regarding this issue. 7. Crystal Bay Service - 3 slips - The Crystal Bay Service operation is primarily a gas dock with one service slip and two transient slips with no over night boat parking. No 1990 marina license application was received from Crystal Bay Service and their operation was apparently curtailed for most of the year due to low water. Marina Licensing Issues - The City has not had a marina committee in operation since 1985, the last year in which licenses were reviewed by that committee. In 1986 and 1987, the City did not license marinas in anticipation cf approving code changes to make marinas a conditional use rather than a licensed permitted use. Those proposed code changes were met with some resistance by the Marina operators and have never been finalized or the issues resolved. Conunerclal Marina Licenses 1990/91 January 29, 1991 Page 4 of 4 In 1988, the City issued marina licenses to four of the seven operations, withholding licenses from North Shore Drive, Maxwell Bay Marina, and Gayles Marina, pending resolution of specific issues. In 1989, pending resurrection of the proposed code changes, no license applications were mailed out. In 1990, after little progress towards those proposed amendments, staff again mailed out marina license applications, receiving applications from all marinas except Crystal Bay Service, collecting an average license fee of $336.00. Discussion with the Council regarding issuance of licenses occured in April 1990, at which time the Council discussed forming a marina committee. At about this time. Council focused on the LMCD's Lake Management Plan, and marina licensing and the marina committee were again placed on a back burner. The 1990 licenses have yet to be issued. The 1991 applications have not been mailed out. I would again make the following observations about marina licensing in Orono: 1. Marina licensing by the City has lost whatever effectiveness it might have had in the past, because the City has not forced marinas to cease operations when a required license was withheld. 2. Land use controls and procedures have been relatively effective in managing the redevelopment of marinas when new buildings or slip expansion (requiring added parking) has been proposed. 3. With low water levels for the last 3 years, some of the marinas have been barely making ends meet, and have resorted to dredging, dock extension, or other unusual activities to maintain their business. At the same time, other marinas have expanded or upgraded their facilities and operations. None of this activity has been aided, hindered, or affected by the City's intermittent licensing of marina operations. 1991 Licensing License applications for 1991 will be mailed out this month. Staff would recommend that Council consider what review process you wish to undertake in order that licenses be formally approved or denied for 1991 (retroactive to 1-1-90) on a timely basis. [ m I .1wiS': I }>' t:1 f « I r' f: 1309 # ■ llrrm0^^ CITY OF ORONO SHORELAND GRANT APPLICATION NHERBASf the State, as provided by Minnesota Statutes 105.485 and Minnesota Rules parts 6120.2500 through 6120.3900 pertaining to Statewide Standards for "Management of Shoreland Areas": and WHEREAS, the State is authorized by the Laws of 1989, Chapter 335, Article 1, Section 21, Subd 3 to provide grant assistance for Cities to adopt a shoreland management ordinance consistent with statewide standards. HOW THEREFORE, subject to available funding, it is hereby requested by the City of Orono that an agreement be entered into by the State of Minnesota, acting by and through the Commissioner of Natural Resources and the City of Orono, to provide grant money assistance up to at least $5,000.00 matching fund dollars, for the purposes of adopting a shoreland management ordinance consistent with statewide standards. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held February 11, 1991. ATTEST: Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk •>} TO: PROM: DATS: Mayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator January 21, 1991 X'/^o. % SUBJECT: Storm Water Management - Concept Review Attachments: A. City of Eagan Storm Water Utility Policy Dated 6/90 B. County Road 15 Financing Alternatives 12/9/87 (Memo Only) C. APWA Article 1/86 Charles Honchell D. Water Resources Protection ISSUE - Presentation to Council of the concept of storm water utility and other methods of dealing with storm water management. INTRODUCTION ~ The issue of storm water drainage and management and the possibility of establishing a storm water district go back to 1987 when there was a proposal that as part of the County 15 funding that a sewer utility funded by foes and/or taxes be established in the Navarre area. Because of the requirements at the time it did not seem appropriate to undertake. It was secondarily raised as a possibility in the Highwood area but again not pursued as the Highwood area was resolved by the City constructing a retention pond on City property north of the problem area and constructing a catch basin in the Highwood Road right-of-way. The difficulty in dealing with a storm water project as a special assessment both as to process and also demonstrating benefit to assessed parties is well illustrated in the consideration of the Navarre Heights drainage area. DISCUSSION - Under the laws of the State of Minnesota there are four general ways in which cities can deal with storm water projects, they are as follows: Special Assessment (MS 429.011-429.111) - Establish a drainage district for each project and then generally an assessment is established either on a square footage or lot basis for how much drainage is contributed to the project. As a special assessment it would have to go through a process of a series of hearings together with proving benefit, and could ultimately be tested in Court. Storm Water Improvement District (MS 444.16-444.21) - As estab 1 ished tnis a 1 lows a City by a 2/3's vote to establish a storm water drainage district and levy taxes related to improvements in that district on a "Ad Valorum Basis” rather than a benefit basis. Although the requirement is that it be reasonably related to tne project costs, it can be used not only for construction r- r but maintenance, upgrade# etc. Annually this is a levy that needs to be established but it is a levy that is outside the levy limits. Projects# however# require an approval process similar to special assessments. v> §^2£I!! 444.075) - This approach authorized under Minnesota Statute allows that the utility district be established and that a fee be charged based on a reasonable basis. This could more adequately address a property's contributions to the water control problem generally in an area and it is one that does not have to prove benefit nor be project specific. Additionally fees not paid by a person can be can be assessed as a delinquent charge against the property in the same manner as the City currently does with water and sewt.r. General Fund - Council always has the option to use general fund monies to do storm sewer improvements# but to the extent that levy limits exist and it is a general tax on the city# it may noL be appropriate for specific areas. Combination - Certain combinations of these items could be allowed depending on the laws and project related to storm water drainage. The discussion if brought forward to look at the overall issue again of how to approach storm water drainage given the following issues: Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan Navarre Heights Drainage Kelly Avenue Drainage Other specific areas for drainage USE OF ALTERNATIVES Several communities have gotten away from the special assessment process and have either implemented storm sewer districts using an ad valorum tax or storm sewer utilities either in part of the community or in the whole of the community. Rates established in these communities for the utility portion# which would be put on the utility bills# generally reflect the amount of run-off for a standard rain and the impervious surface generally expected on the property. For residential properties flat fees are generally established with more complex properties such commercial/industrial having specific fees assigned based on the amount of impervious surfac«.* on the property. An average rate for such# as noted in Attachment A from the City of Eagan# are about $4.50 per quarter or a^oroximately $18.00 per year. It is interesting to note that this not only covers the projects that may be needed# but also maintenance# cleaning# drainage# restoration of wetlands where appropriate (as previously noted wetlands that become too mature no longer have the appropriate jroperties needed to be beneficial) but also things such as ;treet sweeping which reduce quantity and quality of chemicals, jand and salt, dirt and debris are not either a positive contribution to the storm sewer system. Additionally it would allow for selected public education as this is an issue of not just of quantity run-off but also of quality and may provide a city such as Orono a means to deal with public education for fertilization etc. RURAL AREA Given that much of the rural area of the community was developed based on avoiding the urbanization cycle in the "rural" areas which saw increased density generating more non-point pollution (i.e. storm water runoff), it maybe appropriate to establish districts in the urbanized areas only. The whole idea of a comprehensive storm water plan provides a more accurate basis to backup the City's comprehensive management plan and enable Council and staff to deal more effectively with issues of storm water management, run-off, hardcover, etc. The issue is presented to Council at this time to generate discussion and determine if it is appropriate to undertake a different direction in this area. POSSIBLE WORK PLAN If it is appropriate to look at this as an approach, the City could first fund a comprehensive storm water management plan as a local plan following up on the watershed's plan to determine specifically what projects to be undertaken together with what maintenance and management practices would be appropriate. (Note that Eagan's plan was developed by Bonestroo.) It may additionally determine it appropriate based on that study to differentiate urbanized lake areas from rural areas and perhaps have different fee structures based on the needs within those districts. (It should be noted that most of the cities that have put in a storm sewer utility make it one city-wide district.) This is based on the theory that although all lands can contribute to run off, the urban developed properties generally have a substantially greater contribution. (It should be noted that even vacant land at certain percipitation levels do contribute run-off even in the natural state.) ALTERNATIVES - 1. Accept the information. 2. Discuss and accept. 3. Request additional information. 4. Give general direction of this. 5. Table. 6. Take no action. RECOMMENDATION - It is reconmended that after Council has had an opportunity to discuss and digest the information that the Council direct staff to further explore the idea if it is appropriate for Council. Further exploration would include determining the cost of comprehensive study, legal aspects to introduce such a utility and what impact this may have on pending issues such as Navarre Heights and Kelly Avenue drainage. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by Council accept the information from staff and direct they further develop the idea for a storm water utility for Council consideration. Ayes _, Nays -- - - r L t Report for •i Storm Water Utility Policy Eagan, Minnesota June 1990 DEC 18 ^ 3?. APP<4 <c- Date A -/f-fO -AGAN ENGINEER!:::- EE? 1 T1 Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk & Associates »oOer JU ’cif'-f joifo^ C •'•cr-t c J »c“J'S £ V-r .arr« C C SC** 3:^'* ? Cj C* '£ C*^J1 s C 'X"-- :“• ®- Sou^ M £:e- ^ C ’ ^ ^ Gc'tsc" \Xi ^crp' Oona<0 C 3w#^»»5t *• A 9oi»fl3C^ •£ Vj't A •! »5 »oD^ « '£ Civ '? C -T5»crj ®? A ’£ M<-ir C ’£ 9 vaa'\2 vijm « «00€^ C ^ •N5"**$ £ ®? -WJ-C A 5j »-^ »£ Cj'^r . r J^*?** ^£ VUr« * >C ^£ p**»**0 . Cjjvmt * ^£ i-ar *.»ir-“er •* Va'« C Jta .i »? 3a% • V #t 3 ^1 . G'”lv^ "f >•«•• c ^ *^•1 •/ a /^<5 ^ ' C • .e^^v Z :fc c C v^' »£ ^ *.• »i^i*v **J'*a- M C‘»On fngJneers A Architects Juno 14,1990 Honorablo Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3930 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnoaota Rt; Storm Water Utility Policy Report File No. 49482 Dear Mayor and Council: Endoaed la the Storm Water Utility Policy Report for your review and conalderation. Coundl adoption of thia report will eatabllah the policies and procedures used to hnplement and administer the Storm Water UtiUty. We will be pleased to meet with Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to diecusa this report. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANOERUK A ASSOCiATES, INC Jerry Bourdon 2)JS NMrtt Nighway 14 • St. Paul. Minneiota SStll • 412-436 4600 :,r STQHM WATER Umm PQUg^ SEgOBI JUNE, 1990 SUMMARY Th« followina s«ctiont describe the policies and procedures for the implementation and administration of the Storm Water Utility Fund as ac ad by City Council. PgFINmONS Uaen All properties contributing storm water runoff within city boundaries axcaot: vacant unimproved land with ground cover, property used for agricultural SSI^aa and public parks and rights of way. Golf courses, business campus and open a^M areas and other similar land uses are all considered users. Vacvit laWnprovad land with ground coven Property that platted or developed to Its intended design use or purpose. ftaaidential Equivalent Factor (REF): A parameter that relates the amount of runoff from a property to the amount of runoff from a single family residential property Low Density Residential Property: Properties conforming to R-1 and R-2 loned land use (single family detached and duplexes). Medium Density Residential Property: Properties conforming to R-3 zoned land use (Townhomea) High Oenaity Residential Property: Properties conforming to R*4 land (Apartments / Condominiums). ApartmenU and Condominiums are defined as dwel with shared ground space. use dwellings ImparmashMity Ratio: T ^ »tm SiwLl Of no in.p«<n.tflo .tW eoBWbut- runoff Wo 1%the system. irnnarmeMilt area: Impermeable area, for the purpose of determining a prapofty-i BB^fcidudMl^ovoniamo conoioling prinardy of buMInga. drtvMoyo. roadways mid parking lots. Page 1 Property area: For the purpose of determining a property ’s REF, the property ’s area Includes all properly within a legally described parcel except: * dedicated public right of way, • deaiflnated outlets that meet the requirement of “vacant unimproved land with ground cover*, and * Normal Water Level (NWL) area of ponds that are Identified on the City ’s most recent Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. ■MIINQ UNIT The Healdenfial Equivalent Factor (REF) The billino unit of the Utility will be the Resld*»iitlal Equivalent Factor. Each Uwr will pay Ka proportionate share of the Utility’s obligation based upon the Residential Equivalent Factor of the property. Domination ol REF for low density residential land use; All property conforming to low density residential land use will be assessed an REF of 1.0 per dwelling unit. Oetenninatian of REF tor medium deiwfty residenllal land use; All property conforming to medium density residential land use will be an REF of 0.8 per dwelling unit Ail property, except low and medium density residential, will be assessed an REF that la determined from: • the property ’s ImpermeabUHy Ratio and Its corresponding REF per acre as eetahllahefi in Appendix A of this policy statement, and • the property ’s area. mimaMMEMi flg iMi inmn mftw BEiE Th. uiiiaw*e bHIina rate and allocation of if a revenue will be at the discretion of and lha moat currant REF inventory as determined by toa Public W<^ PSSS?!S2 ‘ex The IttO MNIng rate ie $4*98 per quarter tor each Residential Equivalent Factor (REF) uniL Page 2 ^iifenbiTi r I BUUno 01 nowly d«rtop.d proparty will commence with the first water utility bill. RatManUel Bquivelent Factors will be eveluated with each building permit application upon th# sttt plan aubmittad with tha parmit application. The dty may at any time and at He discretion recompute the REF for any properly from htft availabla Information including sita plans, aarW photographs, fiaid msaauramants or any othar availabla data. anjtWTllgtira / APPEALS • No ad|ustmanta will ba mada for low and madium dansity raaldantlal land uaas. • Adluatmants will ba solaiy basad upon recomputation of tha ratio of Imparmaable Area to tha Proparty Araa only. attention of tha Director of Public Tha ra^ Zim IndudVa alta plan with associated computations that datarmlna tha • Adluatmants will not ba retroactive bayc td tha three month period for which tha raquaal for racomputation was mada. MWmOlJOQIC BASIS Tha following criteria was used as the basis for tha hydrologic aspects of tha faa structure modal • modal storm: 5 yr. frequency, 24 hour event, (3.5* rain as par soil conservation sarvica charts) • hydrologic soil type: Type B • Typical rasidantlal unit: 0.5 acres, 26% imparmaable surface Thia critarla Is astabllahad as City policy. Adluatmants may not ba mada basad upon hydrologie arguments. Page 3 J’' f- - if •...- appendix a IMPERhEABILITY RATIO VS. REF PER ACRE loperaeability Ratio (Z) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 23 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 33 36 37 38 '9 40 41 42 43 44 43 46 47 48 49 50 R£F par Acra 1.10 1.14 1.18 1.22 1.26 1.30 1.34 1.38 1.42 1.46 1.30 1.54 1.58 1.62 1.66 1.70 1.74 1.80 1.86 1.93 1.94 1.95 1.96 1.97 1.98 2.00 2.02 2.06 2.10 2.14 2.20 2.26 2.32 2.38 2.44 2.50 2.S8 2.66 2.74 2.80 2.86 2.90 2.94 3.00 3.04 3.10 3.14 3.20 3.26 3.32 lopenoeability Ratio (Z) 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 38 39 60 61 u2 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 93 96 97 98 99 100 REF per Acre 3.38 3.44 3.50 3.34 3.60 3.64 3.70 3.76 3.82 3.88 3.92 3.98 4.04 4.10 4.16 4.22 4.28 4.34 4.40 4.46 4.34 4.60 4.66 4.74 4.80 4.86 4.94 5.00 3.06 5.12 5.20 5.28 5.36 3.44 5.32 3.60 5.68 5.76 5.84 3.92 6.00 6.08 6.18 6.28 6.40 6.34 6.68 6.84 7.01 7.20 ik •V' r CITY OF 2AGAN resolution no. :990- A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A "STORM WATER UTILITY USER FEE" IN THE CITY OF EAGAN. The City Council of the city of Eagan, after review of all pertinent City files, records, and proceedings, finds as follows: 1. The City Council has established by ordinance a Storm Water Utility and a Water Quality Management Plan. In addition, the City has a Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. 2. The City Council of the City of Eagan must balance and decide between the policy objectives of competing and conflicting factors of Storm Water Management. The system can be made safer and water quality can be improved by the establishment of a Storm Water Utility User Fee. Such a fee will be charged to those users for whom the Storm Water Utility, Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan, and Water Quality Management Plan benefit and such fee shall be an increased cost. 3. The City Engineer's office, in conjunction with studies done by Bonestroo, Posene, Anderlik fc Associates, Inc. ("BRA”), the consulting engineers to the City, determined the estimated cost for the completion of the Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan and the implementation of the Water Quality Management Plan. 4. BRA submitted the Storm Water Utility Policy Report dated June, 1990, which report is attached and incorporated to this Resolution as if fully set forth herein. 5. The City Council upon weighing the policy objectives of effective implementation of the Water Quality Management Plan and Comprehensive Storm water Management Plan specifically including the benefits derived to the City and its residents versus the cost to the users of the system, decides that the benefits outweigh the cost and hereby does order: a. That the City of Eagan adopt the Storm Water Utility Policy Report dated June, 1990 and acknowledges the findings of the report, specifically including the "Residential Equivalent Factor" (REF) as the basic unit of the fee structure for the Storm Water Utility User Pee; end b. That the city establish itorm Water Utility User Fee; and the REF at $4.56 per quarter as a f:■ c. That the City finds that the REF is just and equitable; and d. That the REF shall be in full force and effect from and after the date of passage and publication until amended from time to time by resolution of the City Council of the City of Eagan. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eagan this 19th day of June, 1990. CIT? 0 CITY / Thomas Its: Mayor ^ ATTEST: VanOverbeke ity Clerk APPROVED AS TO FO /^aio F. Sheldon / APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: THoiaes A. Colbert City Engineer and Public Works Director Dated: *7^ Notion Mde by: Pawlenty •eeonded by: Wachter ^ ^Those in favor: Egan, Wachter, Gustafson and Pawlenty Those against: McCrea DATED: June 19, 1990 m • • •% ORDZNAMCS NO.2ND SERIES RN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMiNc-iNw C»*i CODE CHAPTER 3 ENTITLED ’'MUNICIPAL AND PUBLIC UTILITIES - RULES AND REGULATIONS, RATES, CHARGES AND COLLECTION" BY RESTATING AND AMENDING SECTION 3.07 REGARDING ESTABLISHING A STORM WATER DRAINAGE UTILIiY AND USER AND CONNECTION AND AVAILABILITY CHARGES FOR THE STORM WATER DRAINAGE UTILITY; AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CHAPTER 1 AIID SECTION 3.99. City Council of the City of Eagan does hereby ordain: Section 1. Eagan City Code Chapter 3 is hereby amended by adding Section 3.07 to read as follows: 1. Stom Water Drainage Utility. A storm water drainage utility for the City of Eagan is hereby established. The municipal storm sewer system shall be operated as a public utility pursuant to Minnesota Statutes S444.075, from which revenue will be derived subject to the provisions of this Chapter and to Minnesota Statutes. The storm water drainage utility will be a part of the City of Eagan Public Works Department and under the administration of the Public Works Director. 2. Purpose of Funds Derived and Allocation of Revenue. Yhe purpose of all funds derived is to pay for all or part of the construction, reconstruction, repair, enlargement, improvement or other obtainment and the maintenance, operation and use of the sewer utility as established by the City of Eagan. All revenues derived from the fee shall be credited to the appropriate storm sewer fund. 3. Storm Sewer Utility Fee. ra) A storm sewer utility fee for connection and availability of the storm sewer facilities shall be determined by resolution of the City Council and shall be just and equitable A charge for the connection and availability of storm sewer service may be imposed for all premises abutting on streets or other places %rhere municipal storm sewers are located, whether or not connected to them. A charge for the availability and connection to the storm sewer service may, in the discretion of the City Council, be fixed by reference to the portion of the cost which has been paid by assessment of the premises. f!' L (b)& s'-orn sewer utility fee for use of the storr. sewer facilities shall be determined by resolution of the City council and shall be just and of*^waterthe use of the facilities nay be fixed on the °5 "®^®J consximed, or by reference to a reasonable classic..ication o the types of premises to which the service is furnished, or by reference to the quantity, pollution difficulty of disposal of theequitable basis including, but without Imitation, any combination of those referred to above. 4. Adjustments. The council may adopt, by resolution, policies and standards for Ihl SdjSstmen? of the fee for parcels. Such adDustments shall not be made retroactively. 5. Exemptions (a)Public rights-of-way are exempt from the fees established in paragraphs 3(a) and 3(b). (b)vacant, unimproved land with ground owned land are exempt from the fees estai-lished in p g P 3(b) . 6. Billings. Finance Director. 7. Recalculation of Fees. Tf a orooertv owner or person responsible for paying the fee maations ^the^ correctness of such charge, that person may have jy . ^ g£ the charge recomputed within six months of publi? worx. Dir.cbor . -ritt.n for the recomputation. t. Collections. »ii ara dua on tha dua data apaciflad by tha City for tha 'ctii io^‘iiss"r cSuact served or to be served. To each account, there shall be added a r r h I if- r >■: I* f- certification charge (preparation for certification of taxes of delinquent accounts) in the anount provided for by City Council resolution. This assesssent roll shall be delivered to the Council for adoption on or before October 1 of each year. Such action may be optional or subsequent to ta)cing legal action to collect delinquent accounts. Section 2. Eagan City Code Chacter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including 'Penalty for Violation'" and Section 3.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication according to law. r. r:" ■ Date ordinance Adopted: Hay 17, 1990. Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper: May 24, 1990. I; : ■ p- i- 12987.8 tevr TO: PROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator December 9/ 198“^ SUBJECT: County Road 15 - Financing Alternatives Attachment A. Municipal State Aid Street Capital Improvements Plan B. County Road 15 Memo Dated 11/17/8'' (without attachments) C. County Road 15 Costs D. Zoning/Plat Map - Navarre E. Petitions ISSUES X7““l'rri 11 a 1 direction to staff regarding financing of project as it relates to types of funding tc be utilizied and approximate amounts for each type. 2. Adoption of agreement with Hennepin County INTRODUCTION - At the November 23r 1967 Council meeting approval was“gTven“to the final plans for the construction of County Road 15, It was indicated at that time that staff would be bringing back further recommendations as to the financing. In addition the Attorney has been reviewing the agreement that nad been received just prior to the last meeting. DISCUSSION - A. Apportionment of costs - The original allocation of costs did prorate the design and construction management costs to the Individual construction items. This allocation does not change the total but does change the allocation among the three suggested financing types 3 11/28/87 12/10/87 Memo Proposed Allocation City/MSA Funding 248,030 218,003 Special Assessments 108,030 126,000 1.) Storm Sewer Dist 72,033 84,000 4?8,330 JJ57305 1 .)The reai'on the per foot cc£t d; i not go up is inclusion of front footage around the corners at 19 and 15 where work is done. B. Municigal State Aid Streets - Upcn staff request the City Eng rrTe^r* has develcned an initial draft is) of the capital budget for the City's Municipal State Aid system roads. As noted in the diagram attached to the program that the City is served in a grid system of "major" streets and arterials. This is composed of a State Highway, County roads and MSA streets. The streets on the system have been the result of previous Council's actions and MSA program criteria. The dollar figure placed on each project in Attachment A and B is based on rough construction estimates. The plan is presented to indicate needs and funding sources. Projects proposed for certain years are not recommendations but are us?d to illustrate how such a plan would work. (As part of its overall goal in the transportation area (1988 Strategic Planning Goai #7) staff will, present for Council consideration during the next four months a more refined capital plan based on priorities, needs, and expectations.) Any "adopted" plan would be annually updated as to costs/priorities etc. Based only on the MSA street system the City has over the next several years needs of approximately $5.4 million with approximately $1.9 million available to it in the form of funds from the State. Should the City choose to undertake a substantial amount of these projects the City will need to use its General Tax Funding together with assessments, developers agreements and other sources to make up the difference. While all these upgrades do not need to be done in the next 13 years, the earlier the reconstruction work is done the less problem there will be for any attendant right-of-way acquisition. It is also anticipated that the relative cost of construction will be lower today than in the future. Th <s layout of needs does not take into account needs that the C ,y has for other City streets not cn the MSA system that may need upgrades. Neither does it relate to needs on private. County or State roads the City may eventually take over. It is anticipated that private and County roads that may in the future come to the City would be at the standards to which the City would be build its streets. It therefore should not necessitate a substantial reconstruction amount. This may not be the case with City streets not on the MSA system. To the extent that they are not on a system however, they generally will not have the heavier traffic use that would be expected cn MSA roads. 4 LINANCIlKd IT MSA7Gener,ar ~ noted above there are substantraT” ne"e3i in* t1ie "comm unity for the MSA funding apart from utilization of it in conjunction with County Road 15. The most immediate items would relate to the two bridges over Willow and Old Crystal Bay together with work on Watertown Road. It is anticipated that most of the upgrading work on the streets would bring these roads to a 36 foot width which would provide minimum 22 foot width permitted by MSA funding together with a four foot bike path for utilization with the overall communitv transportation system. Currently mo. '•f these roads are at a 21 to 24 foot width. Actual design decisions would be made at the time specifications for each project were developed. Should the City choose to use the MSA funds for the construction of County Road 15 it will have a penalty of 5% each year for a total of 10 years or 50% of the total amount of the project.^ As an alternative the City could use a tax levy commencing in 1989 to fund the portion it feels should appropriately come from general tax funds. Funding from the General Fund would have an attendent interest cost which would either be the cost to bond or the interest lost from internal funds. Utilization of $230,000 in MSA funds would be a net cost to the City of about $ 28,000 in MSA funds over utilization of general fund sources over the 10 year period at 7% interest. This drops to about 17,000 at 8% interest. Current interest rates for AA rated improvement bonds are about 7%. Interest rate on City investments over the last six months have ranged from 6,7 - 9,9, Bonding or Internal Financing - Should the City choose to fund a“i^o^f^t’ion~of the~project out of General Fund levies, the choice to bond or fund internally would be predicated on the following: a, ) Fund Balance and desired uses of balance b, ) Interest rates c, ) Cost of bonding (about $12,000) d, ) Amount to be specially assessed (G,0, Bonds for improvements must have a minimum of 20% specially 3SSGSS6c3 ) e, ) Levy Limits (If bonded to the levy would be outside the levy limit) This issue will be reviewed over the next few months should the City decide to use a General Fund levy rather than its MSA funds. 2, Storm Sew££ ^stri_ct - The staff continues exploring whether a~specTal. tlncing district or a utility rate approach to fund a $85,000 portion is most appropriate. It is recommended that this portion be funded from one of these two approaches, and not funded by MSA funds, assessments or part of the General City Tax levy, 3. Special Assessments - The major items as noted last time were For "the" abutOng property owners to fund tne cost: - Curb and gutter - Driveway aprons - sidewalks The costs for square footage outlined last time were approximately: - Commercially zoned and commercially used property ~ $18.00 per front foot h: - Single fa.Tiily residential use property - front foot $5 ■JJ oer Generally the residential zoned properties are unde; 15J front feet with the majority being under 130. Exceptions to this include; a.) 3alboa property which has 550 front feet, and is currently undeveloped, b.) properties that are commercially used but have a residential structure on them, and c.) properties that have more than one single family house on them. (Please see Attachment D) If the City were to fund one-half of the sidewalk costs for the single family used residential properties, it would lower their front foot rate from about S2.00 per foot to per front foot. For a residence with 133 front feet the year annual cost would be S70 principal plus S53 interest total of $120 the first year. This weald be reduced to $"3 $5 interest to 10th year. $7.00 first for a plus 4. Other Sources - The City has explored the use of other Fund fiv^'mechanl sms to assist in paying for the regional cost of charging the water customers in the etc. Given the the sidewalks, such ao Navarre area, use of a tax increment district, fact that the total cost of sidewalks for th** single res identia1 ly used properties is a total of $13,300 it is probably not cost effective to further explore those routes. 5. Street Lights - The staff has not been successful in developing cost estimates with NSP for the project and would anticipate those would be available for January 11, 1983 meeting. ISSUE 2^ agreement ADOPTION The efity AttcTrney has reviewed the County 15 agreement and recommends we negotiate certain recommendated changes with the County to bring back to Council for final approval. ALTERNATIVES - Issue"*! - Policy - 1. Accept staff recommendations. 2. Amend amounts or types of funding for the project in theAction ~ l”“ Adopt the preliminary plan as outlined recommendations. 2. Amend the recommendations and adopt. 3. Table for further consideration until the January 11, 1988 Council meeting. It is not imperative at this point that the Council determine the preliminary arrangement of funding. The earlier however such a decision is made, the more helpful it is as the City will have to explore whether it needs to bond for the project or not. Issue 2 Meeting Action 1. Adopt. iltiian'ii 2. Table RECOMMENDATION Issue ^ - F_inanci^n5 - It is presor- . / : ccTi.ter.ded; a. ) That the City utiliz a general tax fund levy instead of Municipal State Aid Funds for the portion the City decides to pay of the or"iect, b. ) Tha . the City over the ''Xt :ou. ■.onthu work to more fully develoo its MSA capi-. :i itt .emen*. program, ■'HIic.) That the City undertake the i j pay for the SB4,330 portion as ar ea, :‘.er district to i taxing utility d. ) The City preliminarly all t $126,333 for the assessments to the properties with the City picking up approximately half of the cost for the residential sidewalk, e. ) That the staff be directed to set a special assessment hearing towards the end of the project, but prior to September in order to certify for the 1989 taxes, f. ) That the City determine over the next two months whether it should urderv-ake financing out of internal funds or bond for the projec , g.) That the City agree to undertake to the snow in the winter ‘ime on the sidewalks. V a 1 h.) That staff be directed to do further wor< to determine if street lights should be constructed as part of the project. Issue 2 - Agreement - It is recommended that the agreement be tabred "pe'hdlng~nei^ot ’i at ion on desired changes with the County. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by_, seconded by _, ad‘'ct the following preliminary financing plan: that the Council a. ) That the tity utilize a general tax fund levy instead of Municipal State Aid Funds for the portion the City decides to pay of the project, b. ) Thrt the City over the next four months work to more fully develop its MSA capital .morovement program, c. ) That the City undertake the storm sewer di *-rict to pay for the $34,003 portion as a special taxing tility r fr- l, area, \ d.) The City preliminarly allot $126,303 for the\ assessments to the p r ope r t: es« v/rth the City p i c i^4-n9—t, p ' oppcoM imatQ Iy—ho 1 f-——tHre——f-Oif——i e!i i Jm;i > ti-i /' e.) That the staff be directed to set a soecial,\*.^\ • assessment heating towards the end of the project, but /•' prior to September in order to certify for the 1989' taxes, ' f.) That the City determine over the next two months whether it should undertake financing out of internal funds or bond for the project. <'tVXT g.) That the City agree to undertake to the snow removal in the winter time on the sidewalks, h») That staff be directed to do further work to determine if street lights should b*^ constructed as part of the project* and table.^approval of the agreement until January 1 1 , 1983. Ayes Nays _><' ------ Creating a storm drainage utility ChAfUft V. Honciu'll Public Works Director RoMVilU. Minnesota ROSEVILLE RAISED $519,000 in one year Irom siofm sewer service charges. The city OiO not set up the uim- ty as a way out ot Imanctal preP'ems. but because it is the rigni way to ap proach storm arainage. The advan­ tages ot the utility are: • Fairness — Charges are based on how much ol tr.e problem the prcperiy owner creates. • Dependability — It crcojces con sisteni funding and is easily projec- table. • Dedicated funds — There is no competition lor use ot tnese funds from other city activities. • Unrestricted use — Funds can oe used for any type ot administrative, planning, maintenance, reconstruc­ tion. new construction, or other use associated with storm drainage • Legal dafenaibiiity — More and more special assessment projects are being cnaiienged m courts, as oenefits are ditiicuit to allocate for properties on high ground which dram their water downstream • Tax levy reduction — The tax levy can be lowered by no longer funding lhase activities from tax-supported general funds. Roseville cut more than $200,000 from its tax levy as a result cf forming a utility. • Simplicity and tlaxibility — Secur ing City approval, developing a charge system, ex^. ung to the public, and adding an vxira line on utility bills are not loo difticuit. and the lee system is adaptable to locai situations. Before decisions can be mace on utility rates, muen mlormat'on is need ed Most will noi be too difficult to get. but It will lake some time and work Sources tor suen information include existing utility Dnlings, financial records, capital improvement pro­ grams. buogeis. time card accounting systems, zoning maps, and aerial maps Absolutely exact miormation is ruM necessary, experience witri the utili­ ty will enable refinemeni ol lees, creoiis, etc. at a later date. Necessary inlormalion includes the loiiowmg; Based on a paper pitsentea n in» tggs m tofnottonol Pupae wo/xs Congiess and fgw^meni Siiom Doej existing law e'low (or the esiabiisnmeni ol a storm drainage ut..i- ly’ Find oul riov^ much is bemg spent now and on wnat activit.es. Any proposed change requires an understanding of how things currently are done Determine how funds are cemg co tained and from whom This 'S very im- ccriant. Try to Dreak me sources down lOio groups suen as residential, com­ mercial. industrial, enurches. scnoois. vacant properly, etc Tnis wnl come m nancy wnen property owners ask how me Change wiii aMeci them it will also allow tcrmulation ol a rale structure '■l ting ycur views on wno snouid pay lor me utility HOW does the present uimiy billing system function'? How would il OJien- tiaiiy be affecicd by adding :r.is new utility? What planning and administrative costs are anticipated? if master plans or updating of comprehe.'sive plans are needed, this snouid be known. For Roseville, the new state law required major planning efforts — a short-term, but noticeable burden on the city budget. Establish the maintenance ana operational needs of me system, even it they are not already being cone Estimate wnat system replace ­ ments. enlargements, ana new facilities <'e needed, bom now ana m the future Estimate bom me number of parcels of eacn type ol zoning ar.j me total num.Der of acres o( each type cl zone in the community Tnis information preferably would include data as to wnat percentage of each type of zone is vacant. Calculate typical parcel size and percentage impervious of me various types o> zoning You snouid be able to do mis with a *ew sample ca'culations from aerial photos This vitally impor­ tant miormation 13 me local poini lor charging various property users Estimate me general type ot soil and typical slope or grace ot me r>ormai parcel Typical ramiai! data is also necessary Determine me type ano magnitude of privately constructed ano maintained ponds, holding basms. skimmmg facilities, andomer suen improvements on private property It a crec.i system 13 considered, its elfecl will nave to be somehow quartifiea Actual-calcula­ tions or field invesligallcns are net recommenced however, domg so would be too costly anc le- consumir.g at this stage of me pru.ess. Decide wna* groups snouid pay tor me facilities This subjective decision is wnere the utility will most nkeiy suc­ ceed or tail If me utility is perceived as reasonaoiy Charging the right types ot land. il Will probaoiy succeed. If me fee system is viewed as uniaif. resulting m charges cf t^ i -nng size or to the wrong type ol . j jsers. men't will prooaciy fail It elections are r ear or council memcers are feuding, i* may not be the right tirr.e to propose a new program. On the other hand, if ff ere are fiscal restraints, or it is budgei time, or new Ideas are being sought, men this may be time to move aneao. Once It IS lime to move, the most dif­ ficult portion of the operation is next — deciding what the charge system will be. Eacn community will need a dii- lerent method Roseville took tne following approach • Fe# basis — Experience nad in­ dicated the mam basis for a storm drainage tee would be me zoning of tne land and the acreage of the particular parcel, it was concluded that develop ­ ment ot singie-tamiiy, residential land would be essentially similar regardless of parcel size, so a single rate was used lor all such parcels. This simplified bill­ ing arul calculations, and followed me approach of me existing sewer utility • Eaciysions and diafgaa — Smee me system was to rafiact increases m stormwater flow caused by develop ­ ment. vacant property was .'wst charged This Simplified me couaction system, as sewer and water bills are sent to developed parcels, not vacant ones Anomar exception was made (or public road rights-oi-way Most ot ihoso are owned by the city itsetf, and to pay those leas would have simoty meant raisir^ prooerty taxes, at well as col- r lecling from slate highway and counlv governments — a move vieweu as CoM-caiiy sensitive • Runoff tvaluatlon technique — The SCSS system was chosen. It was felt to be fair, nationally accepted, and flexible enougfi to establish a tee aysteni in keeping with Roseville's needs. • Rainfall and program level — City staff wanted a rainfall that would enable a system with minimal charge effects on single-family, residential property owners. But enough fees were needed to offset costs of maintenance, planning, replacements, and enlaroe- meni of the system A two-mch total rainfall amount with antecedent moisture condition II was selected, us­ ing Soil Conservation Service Technical Release no 55 • Credit system — Smce the city was essentially developed and most of the collection system already existed, it was decided that up to 50% of the fee could be reduced by p'ocerty owners providing water quality benefits and uo to 25*/* by their reducing flow rale Wet ponds were determined to be the best way to improve water duality and Brune's trap efficiency curve was used as the basis for determining that aspect. The 25*/« credit for slowing down water was broken mto two poien. tial steps — to*/* would be granted if the peak oulflo v rate was cut to a five- year rainfall event lor predeveiopmeni conditions, and another t5% i( that could be donk for a 100-year event Charge m-ii,ctions could also be granted if a crooeny owner could show the actual development on the parcel was much less than standards set up for the normal parcel of that particular land use zone • Fees — Using »he SCS two-mch rain ­ fall artd assuming the average lot was one-third of an acre .n size, a ratio of charges was developed for each land use zone. Where similar ratios existed for various types Of land use. these were combined into one ciassif<cat'on lor determining the actual fee Fees range from S3.25 per acre lor cemeteries and golf courses to $65 per acre tor commercial, mdustr'ai. and warehouse ov/ners Other classifica- I'Ons are parks with parking facilities. sr;.e tar-..;/ and d^cex re^a.-'ces, public and private schoois and com. munily centers, multiple tamilv residences, churches, and government buildings, and improved vacant The system does '’ct assume d“nticai percentages ol imperviousness on each land use zone This was done to ensure th.at com'nerciai and industrial land owners paid Ihp rriaionly ol the tees M was feit that large, highly resuiled *n S3^.CC0 cr^d'ts bo ’HQ Qivon feduc'na cotpntiai mcomp oZOjI 5 r*’3 v.csJ cl ‘.he •rcc.'^.e come as etoected ^rom ccmmerc al and industrial orcoeriv owners Once the utility is estad'isn^^d. there are many uses tor the lunds Any plan would be expected to mcuce typical u.:res such as administration planning, and routine maintenance ot. ptoes. Dumps. Donds. ditches. vph-cte$. etc However, many cities ^-ive oone beyond such uses. ipciud"^c such ac- •iv'fies IS st'oe! If the utility is perceived as reasonably charging the right types of land, it will probably succeed. If the fee system is viewed as unfair, resulting in charges of the wrong size or to the wrong type of and users, then it will probably fail. sive amounts of aschal! and mot area were contributing the maior water problems both m terms of flow rate and water QUoiity. The rate structure reflects this determination, while assur- ir^g adeouate funds for oresent and future needs • Salesmanship — To convince the dec'Sion makers, a tab*e was oreoared ccmpanng impact of the npw fep with that ot a tax aoproach to fund ng This showed that residential costs to fund orooosed activities would be almost double if tax leN^es were used, while commercial and industrial zcn- mgs would Day little more than half Along with the fact that aimcst 9% m new funds would be gamed from previously fax-free entities such as schools, churches, and Dirks, this wen eve' the cifv council As for the public* r'ews stones and mailings ensured they understood what was happening. They evidently approved, for since thp system s imp!prrpntatior> m April t984 there have been very few com ­ plaints and few credits recuested cr given Out of more than 9 000 ac­ counts. only 31 DecDie have asked for credits with 13 lour'd ’0 be proper This grass collection chemicailv punfvmq lakes, weed cutting of lakes, erosion protection, educating citizens on fer ­ tilizer's effects, and other less obvious activities. Many programs also 'nc'ude the reconstruction costs of cid. deteriorated Dices o' ditches, 'epiacinq or enlarging undersized systems, and expanding Siltat on ponds Also desirable ’S 'he construction of now facilities to improve treatment of runoff, reduce flooding or e'osion or serve areas that do not have a sto^m drainage system Poseviile incorporated an of 'he above nto its system, exceot that the city DroDoses to special assess 25% of the costs of stormwater collection systems n as yet unserved areas. Even in these areas, however ponds, large trunk sewers, maicr ditch ccnstructicn. stormwater pumes. ang similar facilities are being funded bv t^e utility After exceriencing the utility m ac­ tion. if seems clear that th?s aoorcach »3 fair. Simple, provides dependable and flexible fu^eJn. relieves the ger^erai fund, and can be tailored to f’t ar^ com ­ munity s'*uation It worked *or us. and it can work rpr you □ Ar/vA ' januarv it 51690. TO«Mayor anc* City Council IN: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Adrainistrato DATS:May 16, 1990 SUBJECT: Water Resource Protection ISSUE - At the Council's March 12th meeting during a discussion of property at 1342 Rest Point Lane the issue was raised regarding a source of water and looking into whether the City should require water conservation or source regulation relating to both environmental and also a sanitary issue. DISCUSSION - The primary issues in utilization of the water resource: Source A. Surface 1. Lakes 2. Streams B. Sub-surface 1. Individual wells 2. Municipal well and system Usage A. Domestic/Sanitation purposes B. Commercial processing purposes C. Fire protection D. Supplement to natural moisture for lawn and garden watering. E. Recreation Persons in the City or Orono may use 1, 2, 3 or all 4 of the sources outlined for the various uses or combination of uses specified. The City through its initial water conservation ••^Slices passed originally in 1988 control the usage regardless of source when it comes to watering. The City has not required how any specific source be used for My p^^ticular u >age up to this point. The City does not require where municipal water is available that any property hook up to it# however, it does charge an availability charge to that oroperty primarily because of the fire protection aspect to which a municipal well contributes up to that property. V' The City has because of State legislation lest to the State the right to govern any drilling in the community and is researching ways in which it can presently get a handle on it to protect necessary setbacks etc. Related issues - Issue for ongoing consideration in this area apart from the recreational lake use ones include sanitary usage for domestic purposes and any restrictions related to that: Fire protection Depletion of resource Potential pollution of selected sources ALTERNATIVES - Policy - 1. Determine what regulations, if any, it desires to undertake by source. 2. Determine ai;y regulations it desires to undertake by type of usage. 3. Combination of P. and B. 4. Take no additional policy action at this time. Action Alternatives 1. Discuss. 2. Give policy direction. 3. Table for further discussion. 4. Take no action. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council after any conceptual discussion on the matter give their initial feedbacks to the Administrator to determine what policy directions may be appropriate to undertake. It is additionally recommended that the issue related to water from the lake for off**lake purposes be an issue for consideration by the Lake Use Management Committee if that be undertaken. Additionally staff will work on: 1. Additional authority regarding well regulation. 2. Continue an aggressive program for sealing of abandon when they are discovered. 3. Continue water regulation for sprinkling, with anticipation that should sufficient moisture come this summer look to see if they should be removed, if at all. 4. Montioring proposals for use of wells to replenish V I •r-r 1: ■ tfi -i-'' &■ .L- 't ri'x: Lake Minnetonka or other schemes to divert water into the lake. (County indicated this week they would seal the last of their wells.) 5. Consider banning use of fertilizer and pesticides in the community if appropriate alternatives are available. (Reference LMCD's Draft Plan.) 6. Undertake when necessary development of the storm water management plan. 7. Review recreational uses through the Lake Use Group. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by __» seconded by that Council after discussing the issue table it to the June 11 , 1990 meeting. Ayes , Nays TO: PROM; DATS: 2591.5 I Mayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator February 5, 1991 \- • rV 'O SUBJECT: Highway 12 Corridor Study s, Attachment:A. Planning Commission Memo - Highway 12 Corridor Study Dated 1/25/''! (Memo Only) B. Draft Charge for Citizen Committee Members C. Highway 12 Corridor Task Force (Willmar Group) Dated 2/4/91 D. Draft Response Letter ■y ISSUE - 1. Present process for Council concurrence. 2. Update Council as to schedule of up "Dming meetings. 3. Present to Council for their considera^ion and potential adoption a charge for Citizens Committee members. 4. Consider a response to a letter on Highway 12. INTRODUCTION - At the Council's January 23rd workshop they requested that the Planning Commission undertake the review of the process to date. In response to that Attachment A outlines the process they have developed. Additionally discussed at that meeting was the development of a potential charge outlining responsibilities for the Citizens Committee members in representing the City. DISCUSSION - Issue ♦1 ~ In order to undertake the process as quickly as possible the Planning Commission Chair and Building and Zoning Administrator developed Attachment A. It is anticipated, if Council concurs in the process and if they are able to accomplish the work as outlined, that they would present a recommendation to Council at the Council's March 11, 1991 Council meeting. (It should be noted that the attachments listed in Attachment A are included in the Council's Strategic Issue Development Chapter on Highway 12.) Counv.il may desire to accept for further consideration the recommendation at either that meeting or the Merch 25th meeting. Given events currently scheduled for the March 11th meeting it would perhaps be oest to hold a public discussion either at a separate session .... at the beginning of the 2Sth session. I,£sue $2 - Upcoming corridor study meetings. It is our und^standing that there will be no meetings of any of the groups M. % until the April round of meetings which are currently scheduled for the fol^<^ing: •POLICY CWII'^ITTEE - April l*’th (3rd Wednesday of each month) V 5:30 P.M. Maple Plain City Hall TECHNICAL COIIflITTEE - April 23rd (4th Tuesday of each month) 1:00 P.M. Delano City Hall CITIZENS COMJIITTEE - April 23rd (4th Tuesday of each month) 4:00 P.M. Maple Plain City Hall CITIZENS COMMITTEE CHARGE - Attachment 3 represents a statement of direction for members of the Citizens Committee. If Council desires this can be amended and presented at a subsequent meeting or if acceptable at this time, transmitted to the members of the committee. LETTER RESPONSE - Attachment D is a proposed response to the letter received in December. As far as the communications aspect of th-3 study, it is our understanding that MnDOT is currently preparing a brochure for communicating to residents the progress to date on the study and will hopefully be available within the next month. As noted in Attachmenc C the "Willmar Group" has set a meeting fcr March 21, 1991. ALTERNATIVES - Review Program by Planning Commission - 1. Accept the Planning Commission's format scheduling a review by Council for either a separate meeting or at the beginning of the March 25th meeting. 2. Amend and adopt their proposal. 3. Table until the February 25th meeting. Giving task approval to Planning Commission’s current schedule. Update 1. Accept the information. 2. Raise any questions regarding the process Charge to Comr;ittee 1. Adopt. 2. Amend and adopt. 3. Table for further discussion. 99 4. Table pending redraft based discussion. the present 5. Choose not to undertake a specific charge. i- ^ K . RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that Council accept the planning Commission's proposed schedule and indicate whether they desire at the March 11th meeting or as part of the Council's March 25th meeting (or another date should Council prefer). It is additionally recommended that Council accept the information and after discussion make any amendments to the charge to the Citizens Committee that they desire. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by_ _ _, Council approves the schedule for the Planning Commission and sets _ _ as the date for Council consideration with a recommendation. Council additionally adopts Attachment B as the charge for the Citizens Committee after making any amendments to that. Ayes _, Nays _. cc: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director Citizens Committee Planning Commission Chair Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator ■ 'r-',., .r' h 'i ;• i L'i;; "1C Q 1 1 To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Memcers City Administrator Bernhardson From Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Dates January 25, 199'' Subject:Council Direction to the Planning Commission •: “s Study and Make a Recommendation Regarding Corridor Selection/Process for I-BS^/U.S. Hwy 12 Listing of Exhibits - ^ ^ •Exhibit A - Legal Notice - Schedule of Planning Commission Meetings Exhibit B - Exhibit From City Administrator's Memos to Council for 9a0/90 and 11/13/90 Meetings Sxxiibit C - Comprehensive Packet From Council’s Official Files on Highway 12 Task Force 2/88 to Present Presented in Chronological Order - Contents: 1. Correspoiidence 2. City Administrator's Memos & Exhibits 10/6/88-10/13/90 Highway 12 Ad-Hoc Task Force Agenda & Highway 12 Corridor Advisory Board Agendas & Exhibits Agendas/Minutes Technical Policy & Citizens' Advisory Committees Petitions From Private Citizens Schedule of Activities/Hwy 12 Corridor Study City/State Goals - Project Issues/ Concerns Long Lake - Highway 12 Relocation Committee Minutes 10. Traffic Forecast - To Be Updated April *91 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Staff has contacted the Chairman of the Planning Commission to determine a feasible sc**edule for 2 work sessions and a public {(•axrlng for input of conceited residents. We have acted without individual confirmation from each Planning Commission member because of the immediate need to publish a hearing notice if meetings are to commence in February. It is the goal of the Chairman to present a recommendation to the Council at their March 11» 1991 meeting. Information packets will be delivered on Friday# January 25th. Schedule of Meetings: February 6, 1991 - 5:30 p.m. - Work Session February 20. 1991 - 7:00 p.m. - Public Hearing* February 27. 1991 - 5:30 p.m. - Work Session Smlmcted as public hearing date because Planning Commission Members had already confirmed attendance at zoning amendment meeting. Zoning imendmen . meeting will be rescheduled. HTTAcU^h Highway 12 Corridor Selection Process January 25♦ 1991 Page 2 o£ 2 It is hoped that because of the iniportance of the assicnnent and time constraints of the final months of the Highway Task Force review, that Members will adjust their schedules so that all seven members are present. Defining of Issues - At the special workshop meeting on January 23rd, Council failed to provide specific directions to the Planning Commission as to what issues were to be addressed now that the invol-'^ed cities are into the last third of the two-plus year review process. Upon review of the materials, Planning Commission may wish to comment on the process so far and make recommendations to Council on the final phase of the process. Members may also consider the "Initial Tist of Potentia' Goals for Orono" (Exhibit B) and make amendments or additions. This staff member fcund the statements consistent with Council discussions at previous meeting but there was never specific dis».*ussion of this listing of goals (per minutes of September and November meetings). Members may wish to comment on define^, corridors or redesignate others. In addition. Members miy wish to add other physical features or unique uses on the most recent map from MnDot. Unfortunately, we cannot include a copy in your packets but the large scale map will be available at our meeting for consideration. Members are encourag^fd to review the information presented and get back to staff if you have any questions. If Members seek special resource persons at your iraeting (i.e. Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator; John Gerhardnon, Public Works Director; J. Oiann Goat ^n. CounciImember; George Johnson, Eleanor Winston), please ad .ae staff as soon as possible. ■■ :*hTT{.^9^PIAVHIK6 COIMISSIOII TO COHSIDBR HIGHMAT 12 CORRIDOR Th« Planning Commission will hold a public information ■••ting in the Council Chambers at 1275 South Brown Road on iradnasday, February 20, 1991 at 7*00 p.m. for the purpose of the conunents of the various citizens' committees formed in response to the potential impact of the Highway 12 corridor to designated through the City of Orono. The Planning Commission weleOMes other residents with an interest in this matter to M4if^^cipi?te at the meeting. Charles Kelley, Chairman of the runnin9 Coi«ni,»ion, ha« a«k.d that each group or comniittee MSign an authorized representative to represent their interests end concerns at the public meeting because of the limited area •▼•ilsble to the visiting public within the Orono Council Cheadders. It would also be helpful to the Planning Commission if written statements are sent to the City offices a week before the llW^ring in order to assist the Planning Commission in the consideration of the concerns of all residents. Please send written comments to* City of Orono, P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, mn SS323, Attn* Jeanne Mabusth, Building ft Zoning Administrator. The Planning Commission will hold informal work sessions on Wednesday, February 6, 1991 and Wednesday, February 27, 1991 at St30 p.m. The purpofje of the first work session will be for general discussion of the information prepared for this review end the defining of the issues to be addressed by the Planning Qoen^eslon. The final work session will deal with the drafting Qf the formal recommendation of the Planning Commission presentation to the Council at their March 11, 199* meeting. Pssidents are advised to contact the city offices for any changes to the schedule set forth above. To be published th*? week of February 4, 1991. 5 * & /f 129 3 If l I CITY OP ORONO CITIZEN COMMITTEE CHARGE TO MEMBERS 1-30-91 As set forth by MnDOT, the primacy function of the committee is to provide a local citizen's perspective as to input and reactions to alternativesr particularily impacts on schools, parks, etc. Additionally they may serve in communicating back to the public. To date no formal mechanism for communication to the public has been established except for the reports of the various Corridor Study meetings done in the Pioneer. At this point the City has not undertaken support of a specific alignment. Until such City position is developed the following are general guidelines for Citizen Committee members. a. ) Outline potential issues of the various corridors to MnOOT and to the City. b. ) Participate in the process currently undertaken by the Planning Commission for review and development of goals and objectives, physical features and Issues related to the corridor. c. ) When adopted by Council, support these in discussion of the Citizen's Committee and in individual contacts with citizens. Present alternative views to City Council/staff involved in the consideration. d. ) Participate in joint Counci 1/Planning Commission discussion as to potential position on a preferred corridor(s). e. ) If adopted, present that position to Citizen's Committee and contact with citizens. f. ) Assist in development of communication to public in conjunction with MnDOT and the City. g. ) Any concerns should be referred to council and/or staff involved in the process. Highway 12 Corridor Task Force Lid0OirG 518 West Litchfield Avenue Willmar. Minnesota 56201 P 612 ME>10 DKXBt FEBRUARY 4, 1991 TOt MFBERS OF THE HWY 12 TASK FORCE FEB 5 flVMt DEAN LUTER HIGHWAY 12 TASK FORCE CHAIR « » * IBt TSmATIVE MEETINS DATE In m effort to Reap ths line^ of connunications open betxeen the menibers of the lllghwiir 12 Task Fbrce, I an sending this mero to you. I did iiMt last week with District 8 Engineer David Ekem who also serves as the Hlgbwey 12 Task Force coordinator for MnDot to discuss possible agenda For our next meeting. In our discussions it was decided that the lines of oannunication between the three conitiittees meeting in the metro area has good as I have been receiving minutes to those meecings. X have taken ths liberty to tentatively schedule a meeting for Thursday, March 21, from 5i00-7t00 p.m. in Willmar. For that tentative meeting we have sent a letter of invitation to newly appointed Canmissioner of Transportation, John RLley, to cone out and visit with us. Our plans are to have a dinner meeting with the CoRiniseioner fron 5:00-7:00 p.m. Followed by a public fonm in ii4niiia»» In which the Ccmissioner will speak to members of the general public. X will follow thru with a reminder memo once the date has been confirmed with CCMnissloner. If you have any additional items that you would like placed on the ig*"**^ with the CoRinissioner, plaase contact me at Box 221, Glenwood, Ml 96334 or pleeee feel free to give me a call at 263-3545. Watch your mail the nmt coi:|>le of weeks for confirmation of the date, time, place and cost ilated with our nweting with the newly appointed Camissioner in Willmar. Hi- liL 1891 Dear I IP J Thank you for your letter dated December 21, 1990 outlining your ideas related to the current discussion of Highway 12. In your letter you have urged us, as a new Council, to seek alternatives to auto and truck transportation and therefore reduce the need to do an upgrade of Highway 12 from wayzata west. We are in agreement that we do not want to see homes and countryside destroyed. Our first dilemma is that currently we have a problem on the two lane configuration of Highway 12 at 19,000 cars per day with projections bringing it to over 30,000 in the next 15-20 years, based on preliminary traffic studies. Even if we were to find a way to eliminate all additional traffic, a problem still exists. As for the impact, mass transit in the Twin Cities currently takes about 3% of the total daily trips of the system and 8% of the trip& during peak. Even if efforts of alternative modes of transit could double or triple these figures, it would only be a 10% reduction in daily trips and not substantially address the projected 50% increase in traffic on the current Highway 12 in the Long Lake/Orono area. A second dilemma we face is that we desire to keep our low density in the rural portions of the community. To make alternatives such as light rail/fixed guideway feasible between here and downtotm the density both to the east and eventually to the west of Orono together with Orono would need to become an urban (Mpls) density. It is not expected or desired that such population density be reached either here or in the other areas identified. Related to development of alternative means is the fact a decision was made several years ago and is now "being etched in concrete* with the constuction of 1-394. That decision was for 2 freeway lanes for normal traffic in each direction with High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes for use by car pools and buses together with parking facilities to assist in promoting such during peak hours. Because of this, the proposed development on a Metro wide basis of Light Rail did not envision any facilities In this corridor. (Even if proposed, the construction, reconetruction or addition of a parallel alternative to 394 nay not receive a high priority for funding given the recent espenditure in the corridor.) As such, the only mass transit K' I means that would merit priority would be buses^ Park and Rides and car pools to utilize the installed HOV lanes. While not given much viability as an alternative at the meeting on December 1st, the Environmental Impact Statement will address alternative methods of transportation such as you suggest, brief though it may be. If mass transit could fully address not only the existing problem but the projected increase, it would be a viable option. Out expectation is that it will not. We will seek to encourage greater use of car pools and buses in this corridor. We, however, feel that despite that, it will not address even the existing traffic safety problem. As for using preventive rather than remedial means to address problems (your Japanese parable) even if the preventitive steps are taken they may well not slleviate the existing problems and so remedial action is necessary, in looking to solve this problem we will make our best efforts to minimize the negative impacts on homes and the "countryside*. We request you help us in this endeavor. Sincerely, 3itcsffiber 21. 1390 Of;" e Zr>'^0Th« Honorable 3arsara Peterscr. Mayor-Sleet Orono Cir:* Office 1335 3rown Road., So. Orono, Minnesota 55331 Dear Mayor-Elect Peterson, We attended the public meetin? concernir.? Highway 12 expansion it Orono Hifh School on Decemoer 1. After pondering the issues we offer the following thougnts. Aithougn tne'* aav appear somewhat critical, -e hope :--ou and other Council Members will consider them c .refuily and positively in terms or creating a new ’* paradigm" for thinking aoout the issues and developing a proactive rather than reactive stance. Doing so wii.1 serve not only Orono residents but other affected people and communities. , n comment about Mr. Dailuin and his presentation. Frankly, we found his attitude and behavior bureaucratic, thoughtless and demeaning. His consistent ’put-down" of questioners as "NIMBY" proponents suggests callousness. N'e wonder wnat his attitude would be if our positions were reversea. Second, his response to the question about including consideration of alternative forms of transportation as options not deserving aarioua thought was one of the most incredibiy irresponsible •gmtemmnta we’ve ever heard. Is it truly the Metropolitan Couneil’s policy not to consider options other than auto or trucK transportation for fear of encouraging movement from urban to rural areas, but then continue to build highways that destroy homes, bueineoses and countryside? ♦ If so, differently. this is where we must begin to look at things ♦ If so, it reminds us of a story about how the Japanese approach problems as opposed to how MNDOT apparently does. It is told "If the Japanese find mud in the river, they do not start dredging the length of it. Rather, they find the source of the mud and put a stop to it." * If so, we can only assume the real mission of the Mmtropolitan Council and the State Department of Transportation is to build roads, not transportation systems that move people and foods efficiently and safely, in weye that reduce our dependency on irreplacable fossil fuels, in weye that effectively reduce the eontamination of our environment, and in ways that don t force reeidenta from their homes and buaiaesaes. r- i it-r 1^' '^f-f l: I I is-'- lym•IPii Th« central -ssua is no:: whose backyard we :ren?e.^ The issue t 4«.4«feine that the State and the Metropolitan council ac. responsibly and finally take seriously the neea to tina axternat-.e to nove people and goods. We believe Orono and the western suburbs are We hope you and the Orono Council members will take . mI -i.« hoB* vou will become the exemplars in ^a^j-ingehsllen«e. We also hope believe the matter Vr-Tn^vr IS lelected. to the people for a vote. Are we that? We think If not us, who? If not now, when?" ... srviis.;;;-.:; r;r;: ;r.::-"r residents* this matter. Cd^islly* /J Jim Murphy and Sendee Smith 30 Orono Orchard Road Orono* Minnesota 35391 # i a I ■ Ia. p ii & £fe 2691.3 TO: raOH: DATE: Mayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson, City AdministratorJ February 6, 1991 M y*»anit SUBJECT: Police Chief Selection Attachment: A. Draft Request for Proposal B. Police Chief Selection Memo 1/22/91 ISSUE 1. Determination by Council as to process desired for Police Chief selection. 2. Determine if executive search firm is to possibly be used and if so» adoption of a request for proposal to be used to determine coat of such service. lETRODUCTION - At the Council's January 28, 1991 meeting Council set Mon<lay# February 4, 1991 as a response date for input to the level of involvement Council desired in the process. The chart in Attachment A based in part on those two responses. DISCUSSION - Issue #1 - Selection Process - Attachment A represents two charts one that is solely an inhouse process and the second using an executive search firm to a substantial degree. A final process may represent a modification of the two and could be decided once the request for proposals are submitted. Issue 12 - Executive Search Firm - Use of an executive search firm can assist the City in the following issues: Provide expertise in defining the position and selection criteria. Provide active recruitment services for the position. Serve as a "neutral* outside party in identifying for the new Police Chief areas for organizational development . Allow staff time to be dedicated to other priority issues. Serve as a neutral party in judging applications against selection criteria and reducing Council and staff involvement time in initial reviews of upwards to possibly 75 - 100 applications. As noted on the attached request for proposal, should the responses to this request for proposal come back at a price that Council does not deem appropriate. Council can reconsider whether to: ; I A. Alter level of services to be provided or B. Choose to do in house. As for cost and who is to pay for It, it would be staff's racomnendation that it would be solely borne by the City of Orono separate from the Police budget. Even if included in the Police budget as a basic item, the City of Orono would bear 70% of it. The portion of the non<>budgeted amount for 1991 would be an anticipated savings for a Police Chief starting at a compensation level lower than the retiring Chief of which Orono would realize 70% of those savings. ALTERNATIVES Issue #1 - Determination of a selection process - 1. Approve a process. 2. Amend and approve. 3. Table for further discussion. 4. Table for further input. 5. Take no action. Issue #2 - Use of an executive search firm. 1. Approve and transmit for request for proposal to determine cost. 2. Amend and transmit. 3. Table for further discussion. 4. Choose not to undertake an executive search firm. RKOMMEWDATION - As of February 7th input had been given from two or the counciimembers. As such, given the significance of this process that the item be tabled until February 2S, 1991. It is recommended that once reviewed by Council they adopt a process to act as a guideline for selection subject to review once the response to the request for proposal are received. PROPOSED NOTION - Moved by , seconded by _, Council table for final discussion on Febraury^S, 1991. Ayes _, Nays I'.. ■4 ’ri-\ 2401.4 I I . r - ‘I 'evr REQUEST FOR SERVICE POLICE CHIEF SELECTION EXECUTIVE SEARCH FIRM Attachment:A. Service Options B. Police Chief Compensation C. Excerpt Personnel Rules D. Excerpt Police Department Manual INTRODUCTION - The City of Orono is seeking proposals from •xecutive search firms who have experience in the area of Police Chief/Department Head selection for municipalities, particularily In the Metropolitan area. The City is in receipt of a resignation from its 16 year Police Chief Melvin Kilbo which is to be effective on June 30, 199 1. This early notice given by Chief Kilbo allows the City to undertake a selection process and liny^ individual salacted by Chi6f Kilbo^s retirentent. ORGANIZATIONAL SUMMARY - The Police Department of the City of Orono is composed of 15 1/2 sworn officers together with 1 full time secretary, 2 part time secretaries and 2 part time community Service Officers. Among the sworn personnel are as follows: 1 Chief 3 Lieutenants ** have administrative/patrol/investigative responsibilities 11 1/2 Patrol Officers - patrol/investigative duties 5 - base contract 2 1/2 - specifically assigned to Long Lake 4 - eguivalents specifically assigned to Spring Park The Chief of Police, while formally appointed by the Orono City Council, is a department head that reports directly to the City Administrator. The Police Chief in addition to being the Police Department head also works on contractural and ••'^l^e coordination arrangements with the four fire departments that provide service on a contract basis to the City of Orono# T e City in addition coordinates advance life support provided by North Memorial Hospital and provides on a contract basis, control services through the City’s CSO system to Long Lake, Minnetonka Beach and Spring Park. i The current structure was a result of a transition which begen in 1987 and completed in 1990 changing from a four tier to a three tier structure. The Patrol officers are represented by Law Enforcement Labor Services with the supervisors in 1990 becoming a bargaining unit also represented by a different business agent with Law Enforcement Labor Services. CONTRACT SERVICE - As noted the City of Orono (population 7300) does provide police service on a contract basis to the Cities of: s i- V ■f: k Long Lake - 1,900 Spring Park - 1,500 Minnetonka Beach - 600 The contract service arrangement splits costs between a base contract for which a formula proportions the cost among the verlou'< cities together with allowing the communities of Spring Perk anc* Long Lake the ability to select a higher level of service and coverage by specifically paying for additional officers. The 2 1/2 additional officers provides approximately <0% normal patrol time to the City of Long Lake and the fo.r officer equivalents (done by three officers) specifically assigned and portions of 3 other officers partly assigned about 95% patrol time in the City of Spring Park. The Chief of Police is primarily responsible for preparing budget and communicating with the contract cities related to these items with assistance from the City Administrator. The City Administrator and also Police Chief are involved in labor negotiations with the two bargaining units. iSPSCted •“ Possible Process/Service - Because of the unique nature of the contract service provided by the City the scope of services will include involvement of representatives from the contract cities during the process. The anticipated general process is outlined in Attachment A. optional services and pricing for that can also be noted by the person providing a response. RICROITWEMT Position Description - H- f' lx' Current Postion Description - 'bis will represent a description of the job as it curreitly exists. Applicant Characteristics - The executive search firm would identify characteristics fm applicants together with screening criteria for both initial and final screening. Compensation - Compensation for tte position for 1991 is as outlined in Attachment B. Areas For Organizational Develpment - The consultant will spend time with various constituencies including supervisors* patrol officers, csntract cities* Orono staff members and Council in de^loping review of the current position description togtther with identifying areas for future organizational dcrelopment and customer service• will be the responsibility of the firm to plan ads in at least the following publications: (Ifdeadlines are not a problem) League of Minnesota Cities lagazine/or Legilative Bulletin Minnesota Police Magazine Minneapolis Star/Tribune Active Recruitment - It is adAtionally to be the reaponaibility to actively recruft qualified candidates in the Metropolitan area and State of Minnesota together with other qualified applicants tha firm is aware of within a reasonable distance within 2J0 miles of the Twin cities that may lie in other states. APPLICANT SCREENING Initial Criteria - It is to be the rasponsibi1 Ity of the executive search firm* based on ifflicant criteria* to narrow the field to an initial 11 to 15. These will then be reviewed by a composite of Council, cities and staff. con tract Secondary - Based on that, the consultant will assist the above listed panel in reducing the number of applicants in the range of 3 to 5 for final selection. FINAL SELECTION - Background Screeni ng - The firm will conduct the necessary background screening including; meeting qualifications and necessary Bureau of Criminal Apprehension screening for police officers prior to final interviews. Please separately price the cost a psychological screening. ^n^e£v^ew_P£ocess - Questions based on selection criteria and prior experience; develop a questionaire and scoring for the final interview panel together with providing the background information on the individual. Position Offer - As an optional service the executive search firm can provide negotiated services for the process. CKITERIA FOR SELECTION - In addition to the general familiarity in selection of department heads the following represent criteria considered during the review process for proposals: A. Experience in Police Chief selection. Fasiilarity in selection in the Metropolitan area. B. Alternatives to proposal. C. Cost of services D. Type of process proposed together with level of involvement E. Any experience in similar situations where the Department Head is involved with providing contractural services to other entities. V I ; f E The City retains the sole right to select who it chooses to assist it and the scope of services to be provided on a n#90tiated basis once they have selected a firm. Thr City additionally retains its right to undertake the process m It' own. It is anticipated that if they do proceed with a isarch fira that they will undertake a contract process for defining ■ore specifically the scope of services to be undertaken. Ihould you have questions* please feel free to contact ;!ark Bernhvdson* City Administrator* City of Orono. r p- % 2591.2 (I CITY OF ORONO INITIAL COMPEMSATION OOTLINE CHIEF OF POLICE SALARY Present range per 1991 Compensation Plan 21.761 - 25.061 (45,262 - 53,250.08) In addition the Chief receives up to a 5) incentive based on cities with whom contract police services are provided, broken down as follows: 2% - Long Lake 2% - Spring Park 1% - Minnetonka Beach This raises the maximum range to (47,525.10 - 55,912} RELATED BENEFITS The City provides for single coverage of: Health Life Insurance ($ } It will pay up to $23 1.00/month in 1991 for family coverage plus single life insurance on the employee. FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN The City does offer a flexible benefit plan under IRS Section 125 which includes as pre tax Day Care, Medical Benefits Plan and Health Premiums as outlined in the plan. VACATION This will be a function of negotiation with the successful candidate. SICK LEAVE This is 1 day/month. A maximum of 960 hours is an allowed accrual with anything over that going into a catastrophic sick leave bank of up to 320 hours. The successful candidate will be given a credit of 320 hours sick leave. Credit for 1/3 of sick leave after 3 years will only be for the asiounts of sick leave over that initial 320 hours. I: HOLIDAYS VEHICLE The City has 10 scheduled and 1 floating holidays The City provides an unmarked, emergency equipped unil for 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. h- u ■t. r ' ¥- ■S^I- <ifr‘I' % ¥■- t- t f4-if i -i Ei: .- ''i\ !^ \ 0 D1 - Dtveiop - tm^lapmnt tntwvici# I -lAt«fTitlf flUCTIdt PfVXSSS Lev#I of Involv#fw?nt rrocnss \^thdut OimiDE COBULHWr COUNCIL oornrocr cttie SWF EXDC SEARCH (If Any) ffotition Pfetiption Cue rent position OeRcriptlon Clisfseterfttics Rev lew Review Rev lew Develop Develop Serssninf crItseU Aruis for Otfsnlistionsl Review Review Review Review Develop envelop Develop RiCCUitSWIt AmoisioSS«it Retivs Rsetuitasifit De'/elop/ Stbiwit Llrai ted •Cftffitni (Rntieipste 75-100 /questions) Uma on Initlsl CrltsrU ScTMi to lO-lS 5-S for rifisX Represcnuitive(s) on screening panel RepcesentatIves on screcninq panel City Administrator/ 1 Departfsent Head Roksible I Rolice Si^ierviaoc Participate and I Patrol Offioer flnsi atisctiow tooiifeoMw^ immi staff direct Baciig round Intervliw 3-5 (PAybs Cdmcil 1 Rtpresentatlve froo the 3 Cosmaiities on Final Panel City Adedniatrator Participate in ^inal Panel Recompendation to Develop questii Soor Inq Oauncil - Soaring <tf Anyl rnVKtim ROSltiOi Offsc/ ?!r5ioiSr Review Offer to Successful Candidate Participate as Gdocdlnstor (O) Offer (O) TtMltion Ctf 9^} t.. It-p- ■■I' >• ¥ I'A...I::- lift- ■ \ 1 • » ;i^ . i D * Dmlop - DivainQMnt Intarvlaw a - llvriaii t * Xiiurvlai# mmmm panowt Laval of Involvanant OOUHCIL (XNTWr CITIES STATT EXEC MSI "iMaisaa" OMnlftlot Raviaa Rev lew Review Ovvelop Msiat □cvrlop WWvtcw «|VUcMt ChuacMclMlct Ravia#Review Develop CS OoqMtMtlon Rtview Review Develop (V tecMRiiif CclMrU atview Review Review Develop (Meuat AMM tor 0T9MliUttCMl OiwlopMne Rtvtaw Review Develop (b^toelaw ■tottitotr MnOWOMBIC 3i^it Aetiat UKruitMit iJndertakea a^rapf to topliorwt aw^iiii <Mitlc(p*M 7V100 A(|) 11 cat Ions) ■MM m InUui C b UmU aecMn to 10>is Aeviaw Screeninq Screen itoontey iifMirwl l*S for final l^prasantatlvaisi an Bcraaning panel r^praeantaciwea an screening panel City Adainistiatoc/ 1 Defiartaant !lead Rosaibly I Polioe Siqiarviaoc and 1 Patcol Officer Aaaiat PHi Quest Iona ai amni fUiai iilaotiai 41-S) ■MUioiwa acfoanina C3snduct Btfpoflii Scraani^ tnaatviaif nooiaa - QlMtIOM intarviM 1*5 (Mayba Qouncii aiAopiittaa» 1 topcesentati>« frai tha 3 OoMMiitiaa an Final Panel City Adninietrator Participate in ^inai Panel Develop qvB&as and Scor inq tion to QDuncil lnf (If Jlnyi NsItUn OCfoc/mviaw Offar to Siiacasffyi PafticloMii CaotAtim fOICmaidatt Offac (O) etc Myl •V. r • Tot Hqor Peterson & Orono Council Member Froas MaA E. Bernhardson, City Administrate Datot Jasary 22, 1991 Subject t PoSlce Chief Selection ATTACHMENT - A - Polype Chief Selection Memo dated 12/21/90 ISSUE ' Preaatatlon to the Council of information related to a police chief selection. INTRODOCTIOl •* The Council at its January 14, 1991 meeting was presented wiSi Attachment A and requested to outline the level of involvement Siey would like by various parties. At that meeting, it was indiieted that a request for proposal could be put together wift options regarding level of involvement of an outside consAtant once the input from Council was received. DISCUSSION - Subsequst to that meeting, the following local venders of police recruiMsnt services were identified: Sathe art Associates Public rtmagement Consultants Labor Rrtations Associates Once psupared, a request for proposal would be a consolidatis of the ideas for level of involvement of the various partims in the selection process. The purpose of the request of proposal will be to determine how much cost is involved and given the options, allow the Council to select what level of invrtvement they would like. A selection would not only be based on pice, but also on the service and expertise provided by the individuals. There is no requirement that Council undertake a \ow bid* approach should they chose to do otherwise. At the last meeting, there was also discussion regarding identifying areas for organizational development. It is anticipated rtst the issue identification and applicant criteria could be dov to determine areas for this. As such, an outside firm could Srtve a dual role for the City in a positive vein. 4 »■ -■ r%Police Chief Selection January 22, 1991 Page 2 of 2 When the request for proposal is approved, it is antipated that the firms would be solicited during the February meeting tine frane and is to be presented to the Council at a meeting in March . ALTERNATIVES - 1. Accept the information. 2. Take no action. it. r X •> *- X ^ rT^o/Z/Z/gz-r fOs FBOH: DATSt !!ayor and City Council ?lark E. Bernhardson» City Administrator^ i December 21, 1990 SQBJlCTt Selection Process - Police Chief Attachment: A. Notice of Retirement - 12/6/9C B. Selection Process ISSUE - 1. Present for Council consideration the generalities for process selection. 2. Determine general process Council would desire for selection of a new police chief. 3, Level of Participation - Determine level of participation at various steps in process. 4. Staffing - Determine extent of outside resources to be used in process eelection. IHTKODUCTIOH - With the pend ing retirement of Chjlef Kilbo^it Towould DS appropriate to determine the process by which his successor will be selected. DISCUSSION - Elements for consideration in the process are as follows: Determination of the process In house Use of an external consultant Position inventory Position description Applicant characteristics Compensation Screening criteria Recruitment Job marketing Advertisement only Expected candidate identification Extent of applicant search Metro area State wide Regional National Applicant screening y&iiik r f.i kr- i I"k Final selection Transition In the general process there needs to be consideration of level of participation by the following: Council Contract Cities Staff Executive search firm, if any It is anticipated that an executive search firm would at most cost between $15,000 and $18,000. The cost would be less depending on areas in which used, level of active recruitment and extent of geographical search. This is not an amount that has been budgeted for currently but could be utilized from the city’s fund balance. ALTERNATIVES Issue #2, General Process - 1. Direct that process presented be used. 2 Amend and adopt. 3. Table for further discussion. 4. Direct further research. Issue #3 - Level of participation 1. Indicate participation level. 2. Request that that be done by staff/consultant, if any in further process development 3. Table for further discussion. Issue #4 - staffing for process 1. Do entirely in house. 2. Employ an executive search firm. 3. A combination. RlCOyMEWDATIOW - Given the length of the items undertaken, the siffiiffieant impact and assistance from Orono plus the contract eieies and current state of the police department it would be bslpful to engage a person/firm from the outside to do the bulk ft tlio work. If this is acceptable staff would solicit request for proposal from search rlrms who have done police chief loyments in the Twin Cities area specifying that this request • • for proposal be brought to Council it its January 23, 1991 Council meeting. It would be helpful if Counci Ime.tbers couli indicate where they feel involvement of th? various groups woull be appropriate. It is requested that ti.ese be returned bf Friday, January 18, 1991. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by Council direct staff to solicit requests for proposal for consideration at the Council January 28, 1991 Council meeting for search firms who have done police chief employments in the Twin Cities ares specifying areas of the various groups and their involvement. Ayes , Nays . . •* • • «...../IrrAd^/^evr f! Vr T0« Mayor and City Council riOMi Mark E. Bernhardson, City Adnjinistratoi'. I OJins Dactmber 6, 1990 SOBJXCT: Notice of Retirement Attachment: A. Notice of Retirement - Mel Xilbo 11/30/90 m UB - Acceptance of a notice of resignation of Chief Mel Kilbo eetive June 30r 1991. IMTXOOUCTIOII - A3 noted in Attachment A, Chief Kilbo has inaioat^d he intends to retire at the end of June. While such advance notice is not required^ his courtesy of this early notice will allow the City to undertake the selection process in a timely enouqh manner to possibly select a successor by his retirement date. Chief Kilbo's many years of service to the City of Orono and to police work in the Metropolitan area will be recognized as the date of retirement draws closer. Options for a selection process will be presented to the Council in January. Depending on the nature of the process selected it ■ay take 4-6 months to complete. PAOFOSEO MOTION - Moved by.]^, seconded by the Orono City Council accepts the retirement notice of Chieffielvin Rilbo» as an ei^loyee in good standing^ effective June 30r 1991 and directs staff to prepare the recognition of his many years of hardwork Mid dedication to police work as his retirement approaches. Ayes ^ Nays / • cct Mayors of Contract Cities Department Reads s..0 « ' I v'-'\ ^ u # • • Intarot-fica rtema DEC 6 1S90 0«c«: Novaffloar 30. 1990 Tai Mark Barnnarason. Cirv Aaminxs^racor Froffis Nalvin Kilba* Chia*f a-f Palica Rat Aa cartain parsonal plans and goals ars cooing to complation* I am advising you I intend to retire as Chie-f of tha Qrana Palica Oapartmant e-f'fective June 30. On Juna 30, 1991, I Mill have 32 years. months at aunieipal service, Nhich Mill induce IS years, 6 montns as Qiia9 of Police in Orono. Aa you had requested same time ago, this si:i manths notice will allow tha selection process iar the new Chisf to be wall on tha wav to conoletion 1w J •j"' :: I- My'iv-y '■I #■ ». .'V. -*i- V'mI a - ii #■ 4 t a ■^r 4-'- .;£tii'iife' 0 01 R 1 Dtvolop D«V«lopMI Rtvltif tnt«rvl«w ORScrlptlon ARplleMt ClMCRCUcUtlct CoapRnaatton Sec««nlK9 Crlt«tl« Mtiv* RRctaltMnt CRltMla ry Ho 5-7» npat loloctiow (3*5) lietfciSMiettofl 1 n« Intocvlaw Procosi • Qnaationo - OeofflMf fit Any) ••lootIon tMlklon OCfoc/ Mootlatloa lie —<o0) TCMRltlon Ilf Any) 121990,1 /rTT/fQ/Z/ffevrSRlJKrrKM PKOCBSS Laval of Involvement COUNCIL CONTRACT CITIES STArr EXEC SEARCII lie Anal I 'r' 'n. O' * i-f-v ' t 13091.9 I TO: riOMt DATS: Mayor and City Council ^ Mark E. Bernhardsonr City Administrato February 7, 1991 rein Ml 8QBJKT: Facilities Workshop Date Attachnent:A. Facilities Memo Dated 1/22/91 (Memo Only) B. Outline of Issues Related to Site C. Staff and service Background Memo Dated 5/15/90 0. Boarman Proposal Dated 2/8/91 Alternative Design Development E. Space Rental Memo Dated 2/1/91 F. Repair of Lumber Yard Dated 2/5/91 ISSUES 1. Present for Council consideration the issues and factors related to one site for all facilites (common) versus split sites. 2. Present to Council an update on a questionaire for residents of the "Crystal Bay Area”. 3. Address options for storage of certain Public Works facilities on an interim basis. 4. Present cost to have Boarman undertake alternative sketches for design of facilities in the Crystal Bay neighborhood and if Council desires to undertake. 5. Establish a meeting date and scope of action for upcoming workshop on the matter. IWTEODUCTIOW - At the Council's January 28, 1991 meeting the issue ot i^acilities was discussed and raised the following issues: 1. The issues related to a common site versus split site for all facilities. 2. Request that a questionaire/survey be done in the Crystal Bay neighborhood. 3. Issues related to the design of City Rall/Police facility for Crystal Bay neighborhood. 4. Discussion as far as a date for a workshop was tabled to the February 11, 1991 Council meeting. m DISC versus split site - Attachment B is a draft ■»l f tHe issues related to the site, both ones that are quantifiable together related issues in the areas organirationa1 development, location and compatibility of land uses. It is requested that Council indicate other issues they may think are relevant or questions as to information presented. Jack Boarman is reviewing the draft. 2.Neiqhborhood guestlonairje - A questionaire is being draft for Council review. Tfie questionaire will attempt to give background and alternatives that would be helpful to the neighborhood in making an informed decision. If Council desires to undertake alternative design for the Crystal Bay site, such designs would be most helpful to give a pei spective on how the building would fit. 3. Storage of Public Works equipment - As mentioned at the January~?8th meeting, staff nas been exploring what to do with the current "L imber Shed" and the equipment stored therein. Staff feels "hat the building may be on the verge of "implosion" on its own and has been researching options related to that. These options are as follows: A. Status Quo - Continue with the utilization of the current structure but continue to close off areas that are unsafe. B. Renting of Alternative Space - Staff has been working over the last 2 months to determine what space may be available of at least 15,225 square footage and the only rental square footage of significance in the area is in Tonka Bay, near the NSP facility. It is estimated that to rent the sole building there, which would be storage but large enough to allow the operation to work out of that facility on an interim basis, would be about $50,000 a year plus utilities. This facility however, would not equate to the longterm needs and would result in much jockeying of equipment and outdoor storage to make usable together with lacking many of the offices and shops that are felt needed on a longterm basis for the City. C. Tear Down Existing Fac11ity, Undertake Outdoor Storage of (Current Indoor Storage Materiais ~ Under this option tke ^ity would fence in the parking lot next to the lumber shed area, together with utilising the fenced in area under the Navarre water tower for storage of trucks and other equipment outside until a new facility was completed. Once fenced in the City would then have the current lumber shed removed. Interim Repair of Lumber Shed - Staff explored to see TT'certain structural reinforcements could be done to the existing facility to lessen the potential for implosion. As noted in Attachment F, the feasibility is non-existent even if certain repairs could be done/ the code (Building or Zoning) dones not allow a dirt floor for a commercial building. E. Undertake a New Faci 1 ity - Should the City select a site ?or Public Works and determine its financing approach it could immediately go to construct a building for Public Works and once completed move into that from what ever option was selected for interim storage. F. Construction of a temporary - The staff is attempting to obtaTn an estimate for a temporary structure for a 1-2 year period. It is hoped this would be ready for the 2/2S meeting. 4. Combination Issue M Redesign for Crystal Ba^ Neighbo^opy^**This “Tssue^waiT’discuss^ at the meeting on the isth and issues related to that to come up with an alternate design include as noted in Attachment E. Size Shape Quality and texture of building materials Roof line Number of levels In discussions with Boarman he would be willing to do additional schmetics for this site based on discussions by CounciImembers as to what kind of things they found objectionable with "standard design" for this neighborhood for about $3,000. 5. Workshop Meeting Date and Purpose - This is addressed in Attachment A together with the issues of note at that meeting would be: Site Size of facility Cost and financing Roles for Planning Commission and Citizen Committee Additionally related to that would be level of participation Council would desire from Planning Commission and Citizens Committee in that workshop. M.TIWIATIVES - 5L H-v.-.J Issue II ~ Common versus split site 1. Focus on one common site. 2. Select and focus on split sites 3. Raise additional issues or ask questions. 4« Table to February 25th Issue 12 -> Questionerie 1. Table pending further draft development Issue 13 - Interim Space for Public Works 1. Narrow options for further exploration. 2. Select an option for more definitive information. 3. Discuss other options. 4. Table for further discussion. Issue #4 - Design for Crystal Bay 1. Give direction for key items. 2. Table for further discussion. 3. Authorize proposal in Attachment C Issue IS - Workshop 1. Set Date. 2. Table for further discussion. 3. Define scope. 4. Define roles for groups. mCOMMEWDATlOW - Issue . . Common versus split sites - Staff continues to recouend from an oMcationalf cost and compatibility of land use that a common Site be selected. It is our feeling that criteria outline gave tbm requirements for the site and that a common site best meets those. Staff however* encourages Council to identify further Issiiss or information revelant to the decision and recommend tabling until 2/25. Quaationaire f •• f n- 4 t t rl i: 'v- B k ■r ■ ti i7' 'sTiiI % f': K-I n\ 2/25, It is hoped a draft will be sent to Council by 2/15. #3. Interim storage - It is recommended that Council table for further lnl!ormation regarding temporary structures. (It should be remembered that if the Public Works goes ahead of the City Hall facility there may be implications as to cost savings of bidding both at the same time and impact the cost for bonding if the whole thing goes at the same time. It additionally brings into play the question of a referendum on all the facilities or if the Council desires to fund one and have a referendum on the other.) #4. Alternate designs * Once the Council has given the architect feedback, it would be helpful that he go with alternative designs for the neighborhood if a split site is to be pursued or if a questionaire is desired. Workshop - It is recommended that the Council table discussion ol a date until the February 25th meeting. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by_, that Council give Staff direction as to the various issues related to facilities and table to February 25, 1991. Ayes _, Nays _. cct All Department Heads Jack Boarman, Boarman Architects, Inc. 222 North 2nd Street Minneapolis, MN 55401 , ,, I ■■ r TOs Mayor Peterson 4 Orono Council Members Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrate Sf.»- Dat i«January 22, 1991 Snbjactts Facilities Workshop ATTACHMENT - A - <I:ity Facilities dated 10/30/90 ISSUE “ Determine when Council would desire to have a workshop on city facilities. INTRODUCTION - At the Council's 11/13/90 meeting, it was JJtersnCiTed'^tKat before further work be done on the facilities that a workshop be held. Subsequent to that, it was felt that this workshop could include all Council members so that it was delayed until an appointment of the fifth Council member and because of vacation plans delayed until the early part of March. Dates for which a workshop could be held are as follows: March 5 Tuesday Evening March €Wednesday Evening March 7 Thursday Evening March 9 Saturday Morning March 13 Wednesday Evening March 14 Thursday Evening March 16 Saturday Morning It is anticipated that this workshop would undertake the followings A. Roview issues and comments to date; B. Determine future direction; C. Determine role if any ongoing for the citizen's Committee. It is anticipated that this workshop would be held in a larger facility, such as the Orono High School Cafeteria or the Presh Water Biological Institute. The basis for the workshop would be the Municipal Facilities Study book that was presented to Council as part of the stategic developsient. Should Council desire additional information apart from what is in there, it is requested that that specific request be given to staff for information development prior to March 1st. feaj#!., I*, I. Facilities Workshop January 22, 1991 Page 2 of 2 ALTERNATIVES - 1.Select a date. 2. Table for further discussion. 3.Take no action. RECOMMENDATION - [I & mW:- i' %w-¥tr;- i- M' ■ K,.'. • ;v fp. It L • = I. It is recosmended that the Council set aside a workshop time at either the High School or the PWBI for a review of the issues and appropriate information be sent to the public prior to the meeting. PROPOSED MOTION! Moved by establish i , seconded by facilities workshop on that Council timer at location and will indicate to staff additional information that they would like available at that meeting prior to March 1st. Ayes ___, nays ___. MEB/tln cct Department Heads Jack Boarman, Boarman Architects, Inc. isairu'j\rT^>9in'jr2 CITY FACILITIES - CITY OP ORONO COMMON SITE SPLIT SITE A. Highway 12 B. Old Crystal Bay Sewer Plant C. City Hall/Police D. City Hall/Polic« Crystal Bay Crystal Bay Neighborhood Neighborhood Capital Oeata (Site Specific) Laaa tSa*af Property i Crystal Bay/Heighborhood OCB/fawar Plant Public Works - Highway 12 Public Works - OCB Sewer Plant $292,000 $292,000 (34,500) (200,000) (34,500) 0 (200,000) 0 0 •its DavalapsMat •oils Oarraotion Mtar/lpriakler support •MBr/Otilitiea IfiBaaping itvaat/Parking/Curb-Gutter >11 tien/Curren t 160(-415,000) 0 25-60,000 90.000 35.000 0 162,800-282,800 25-50,000 25,000> 120000 35,000 75-150,000 160,000 25,000-35,000 25.000 120,000 35.000 15.000 325,000 25-50,000 25.000 55,150 35.000 Offiaa (000 sf 0 160-70) 0 0 0 0 Mat DavalapMnt/Bidding Bite 5-10% of bldg savings (56/145,000) 5-10% of bldg savings (56/145,000) 40,000 50-60,000 0 40,000 50-60,000 0 0(?)30-50,000 30-50,00« 4 Possible realignaent Acquisition of of OCB (100-200,000) Houses Minleuai 1*$50,000/house £ Li' . L- ’ ^ ^ MFI M f?I ^ u'<J u ■mfIIaCITY FACILITIES - CITY OF ORONO COMMON A B MCAnOM CH/PO (Asnaai OBOfraphle Cm tar o( City - OCS B tawar Plant) Diataaeat Proa *eantar* 2 ailaa 0 1.5 Proa OCB/M Drive 2,5 0.5 1 Tiaai Praa OCB/Ht Drive All raaidenta can reach this site without goln? thru another coaaunity. eomknau lamo use !• Coaaereial Residential/ Urban Natural* Residential •Cltv ■all/Polica-Offica/llatail *Pakiia Marka-Lt. Xnduatrial •tcala*^laaa Slnllar/Saall 4x5 times S-12 times -- - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - -—-than currant surrounding Parlaaoaa Euildiap Setba^S None None None (if no or limited expansion) Parkiaft latkacks None None Yes f of spaces Possible ■avBaaaar (On-proposod outside lOOO* Mostly About tafaiatieaa - 25%) outside 40-50% 1000* Hardcover il Aapoctst Oaaitai Can place it in PM's at less s.f. cost Lunchrocat one less office P«*s tripe tataaaa faeilitiaa on foot SPLIT C PW CH/PD D PW 2 2.5 1.5 I 0 0 Cc3fTOTercial Urban Residential Commercial Bqual/less B-12 times 4-5 times None None None None See C None None Outside 1000* About 40*50% Hardcover Mostly outside 1000* None 3-4 miles between sites hr I r rI |=yf ^c>TmMUm CITY FACILITIES - CITY OK UKOMO Vehicle Can itore Adwin/Police vahiclat in winter without additional s.f. fueling on site Remain outside or add 'raraqe space to CH/PD 17,000/stall). Fuel split site or 2nd I lystem. j> require receptionist /secr^t.iry at Public Works or always have supervisor present ( S30,000/yr’. 2nd telephone sys*?m for PWs. Uaa of txiatinq Propertiesi Sewer Plant Residential Crystal Bay/Current City Hall Park or housing (plus post office as is) Facilities Same as A Residential Fact 1ities Bnpendability of Sitet Extra bldg site plus building expansion of CH/PO/PH More limited than A CH/PD Very limited PW food CH/PD Very limited LimitedJoint Site fo«^ other Purposest Could be ——•—- - - - --— - - - -used in (Library/Post office) conjunction with library/post office/school/other commercial« etc. None apart from incorporatinn existing post office See C llty-i i«ents Easily described Reasonably Not as easy easy Easy See C -Beeidents*Easily described Faci1itles Faci1ities PW Good Possible Reasonable Reasonably More difficult easy Persons may go to one site hoping to find the other. [• L’- s 51590. flrm^€vr(l TOt nuoN Citizens Facilities Committee Mark I. Bernhardson, City Adminis DATBs May 15, 1990 SOUBCT: Staff and Service Background Attaehaants: A. Engineering Service Ileview Dated 4/13/90 ISSUE - Provide ^•*P®!'*** The specific responses A. Cutr.ne »rd ptojdct.d t>as=«rs o£ staff. 8. Sp.e. impact, tho,. have on the proposed layout. C. coat impact, of tho,e layouts. « ««rv*ces to other communities onD. Impact of contract services City budget. w « .in 1 oeo meeting the Citizens Review TM*PSflDOCTZ0tf - At the May p.h« current and proposed ioiuIUa* iVl,ad A*/iSrsi?J to detetmlna what Impact, oemcalX project. ptlCOSlIQM - ea—untW SB4 2fl«»t«atlonjl Growth • ...ad «« th. currant sonln, «;Vro;"V:t*io%^*o" built out In about 10 yeara ocolactac' apaca la anticipated >:il> on thaa. u lit d J'o t a n t i a 11 y for a ;?,n1*«lc*i‘.’S-b«"f bayond that. Otbat aeanarloa which may includ. ».y of th. foUowin,: - maw typo, of aorwleo to Orono realdonta. . Additional ..twlca. for other, curr.ntly a.p.rat. jurisdictions. . cbon,. in sonln, -bich si,nific.ntly Incres... tb. population. ... not ,c«lio«bl. anouob to . 7 rr ! fcha abilitv to accuire anv contiguous or non contiguous land for will be 'several^ U;nited even 10 years from now. a «*.*#€ Prelections - The staff has occasionally over the last tCta oft h r ee years Too k ed at what factors would govern potential afcaff inc*‘eases during the next 10 years. The pr< jections 9iven th. ^ one, that are essential' based on tbe following criteria: increase in community population Shift of function in the following areas; Engineering . Recreational Supervision Assessing Cfialneerinc - The issue of whether the City looks to an in-house •nlineer'"^r not Is currently being explored as outlined in A Even if the City remains with a consultant engineer that person may need some in house space to better serve the organisation. Recreation - Another significant shift may oe a flereatlonal supervisor, which most communities have, but the City of Orono is currently handling througn f SiHrilt by contributions to its fund, pe ra<*raafeioB supervisor for Orono is based on the potential that iShSSl distrUta W cut out this function given the ever dfe^aain^ doll ”, «Ll.bl. to th. ,cbool, doc oth.c pro,,..,. Asseesine - The space for the Assessor may be needed oc on a contract baals. A, a itaw itAM MAM aval’able to better serve the public. A related la fehA there few people who provide this service and the City may be required to make it an in house function ^•‘^*“** ® lac^ oe available contractors. (Orono is probably one of the moat difficult cities in the State to assess because of the unique and varied types, of housing to a full economic spectrum.) •aiiea - Rare the projected growth is a straight projection for enMnerease of three patrol officers to parallel the population qrowth • Marks - The orowth in actual public works personnel apart ISi^e5?fsfering Mounts to three individuals again based pclaarily on Increased population, although the increase may less tbSB that. IMPACTS OP PROJECTIONS The following represent the impacts of staff growth projected owr th# n#xt t#n y#ars. p;. I. I*' >S- I'I, im mir # OF PROJECTED ADDITIONS SQCARE FTGCITY HALL COS' AdminBldg/zoning Finane* Baeraation Snginaar Aasaaaing 1 Clerical* 1 Tachnical 1 Clerical 1 Tachnical 2 Admin/Technical 1 Assessing 72 99 104 120 198 99 692 Total Gross (35%) 1,064 $35,169 POLICE Orono Contract PUBLIC WORKS 3 Officer 1 Clerical* 3 Maintenance personnelrBLIC woRsa » ^im»r in the aosition so would not result currently have a part timer in tne b* in a apace saving. qXmbB-SS-------------- .k.. <-Anferacts with Minnetonka Beach, ,alle« - Th. City eurt.ntiy «>"“«« contr.et, pay not IfHI? Fact and W"’ /.“but do pro.ld. th. City with aonly for th* coat of the otticars, o r contract charge 10% adniniatrativa In addition each of th*tb. apaettieaixy allotad .11 eonnunitiaa pay * t®;.! of over $220,000 for theasaooiatad to each of the connunities as each The arranganant is . mininun of five, if not six, of tb* eonmunitias maintenance expenses to have officer* plu. other Reaper rate around the clock service a City of Orono benefits eontitetiaf .Ith orono. J" ’ii.ilar baale fore, as it would essentially * eiQcit service to as large a "..If trpYo.ld. "r.ni...nt li oituilly blMflcUX to .XX “““iV uLd ^i.t“.r *5.“ lla facility that would ?.#£--*„€* being the number of offioor. It .bouXd b. .tat.d__tb.tcerenw ww*»»Tiof Clears wiwi w..»j ——-r rt should be statec rn«« XMbot .f.o.. tb.t it ,-i not auaoXat.., and .ouXd OMMU o? Sire, than .Itb . Xac,.r ;«oT K.‘V.V«Vxx“l*'.fix?: "n*lf orono did not contract -Itb amy of the commun ities. b.l«.X enntcol Iirtg - “i/, Mrk; Hinnotonta S.acb .nd"gfrrSL ^ a onatract basis to Bp^ring f« , control service. together with juiTdecrease the number of hours the function such as would be working. The contract cities community service 0^ cost is $11,000. Again this pay ^3,400 for a syvice conununities. The City did is a beneficial £unc‘'*on because it was havingget into the animal control f^Jc..on ne contract Iroabl. 9««ln, . o£ y.ars. Several artangenent that it nac r private eSlf^“rctVrVbe«ue. of lack of availability of service or reasonable service quality. or. a contract basis, ? a r k and ot reduce a o#rson if th€S€ concr®wt» buildiric ra”,ln, *fo» lo'r ropulatiorr'co^iart-so^'ttrs would but assist in the *«?tic are zoning because of the very unique in ^e ^e^^j^joning ordinances, septic program andstringent and coy I ica tea zoning the unique -JhrtaVtial ^modelings. The department community together with *“^»^^"^t*ienues from all fees than the ,.».r.t.s sobatanta.l^ ,‘n",'pVoj,c?io”for increased staff ”:iVS.'io\“%%«Vy""oVt in tne s.ptrc and soning areas. COST 2F SPAC2 NOW VEH3T« THE additional l* the building addition 2rn:t:»cti^^VcU.^’““p,^^b•the .V.ra,. over tt. last 10 years at 3% pec year. COMMON LOCATION FOR FACILITIES cometycti^ . From^ th.^ thV .«:%"niJic"tor^ u1: thlt'^the City could ®\rad?it?o ”n^'w \h5 1100,000 on 12 million regarding utility building construction sewings, gHaeed parking hookups, having •common" espsnslon space on fscllltiee, rJJ til Mpecate pereels having to the esM site ee Suh two sepSrete sites morehave aspens ion space for each, witn w (otel Isnd would be needed. lo i Li- S 'It ma-lor wells to handle this at a cost of water service will are separate it would double that $200r000 or mote. If sites are sep«t«^ cost. sp.c, ...tin, roomsgRfiUp PtUc. PubUc wo»^ „oms q.w.s th«t o*n b. sh««d, bstMooms, ,th.t etc. rot ^**1^^^* works building without anystorage can be Placed in tne pu square footage cost operations Pfoblem at a substantia storage could be than in a City *'public works building for city police vehicles and not all ca e together with the non The ease of intearatation of a work force between quantifable Issues to discuss conuaon issues and Jublic works, If not locate^^^^^ the same site it may find common coordinate certain functions or ISf“.‘opr/stlon «.y mot b. a. .£f.ctlv« and afflci.nt as one on the same site. euatomar a eaBdoolnt - Th. splitting up ot SiJlT^anrepteoB for P^P^* “Vue.taoriocatiin^ It Is public works if ^hey were -q the public can come tomuch easier to have it all in ne pla ^ having to "chase operation. 4 T.. 4. hAB*d that these do provide some guidance wd m^¥^l^.*ilat>xi foliutth.c qu.stioas at yout m.atlng on May 24, 1>»0. 'll E-r 1' '■r ft BOARMANfaASSOCIAU^ A f C H • T I C ■ I. t s c ' *« t t r ! '• - ISTtiEini; NbnaiyB, 19B1 Mr.lMIvnhv^ CtyofOreno P.O.iOK« OryMltiV.MNa6»9 DttrMtrtc 0opl«ifOrtM«d6Uno City Hall •!» for an 6 to prapara tha daHon work and MOO for Thi diflon wortc wnM mohidi Itia toMowino; i SS3Ss5Tr«^r.^^ iSSTpi^l^ Tha work would bi dona wBnolwotwM pMM Mr your app»w^ TIM work w«M BfoaidO • MMito luMlon or how tM Cly HM riMda M w lo1hiddCiyMMaMMOMM«eoppoituntytofd»«if*»k«»Po*^®^*^***- me., i appracMithli opportunayioaoaln bi JBtlan naNma: pro|aet\om2\b\2-|be 211 *^*f»r* i»*«J Minntjoo''* M.onno'j I Q y J '' C tJ c- ’ . - “j 4.t*4 3-'A’ b 1-*JV ^2 2 ' •J-- Z-i'. i-.. ' / n\ !, • • Vos Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director Datos February Ir 1991 Sobjoets Space Rental - Public Works Recently I visited a property that would be suitable as an interim site for Public Works. The building and grounds are located in the City of Tonka Bay and behind NSP on County Road 19. Attached for your information is a proposal from the listing agent regarding that property. The proposal has been verbally adjusted to a one year length of lease# all other items remain the same. It is also our understanding that the use is approved as per the zoning of Tonka Bay. mm i- f. ■ II- i; tt-fj T0ML1N80M COMMNY Commtrexi/lndustrial Real Estate Sales and Leasing 17S30 Bieeowwood Rtf. weyw. MN S$3»i S12-4rS-l21T 1- 1 - 1991 Hanus Bus property Area - Land Bui 1d1ng approx 97,575 sq.ft. Finished shop Granular floor 4,150 sq ft. 11,075 sq.ft. approx, approx. Total sq.ft, approx 15,225 sq.ft. Rental rate; 4,150 sq.ft.Finished shop area approx. 9 $4.00 per sq. ft.per yr. Granular floor area approx. 11,075 sq.ft. B $2.75 per sq. ft. per yr. $16,600.00 30,450.00 47,050.00 Per month 3,920.00 Tenant to pay cost of heating, lighting, phone service, water and sewer service. Occupancy • Iiaiaediate Length of lease - 2 years. 1 #, fe 1..^- § • I, ■t !? IM. NA«ILL ft 60w INC* 1H- '^1 T. ^nCUOD^ft €,L,fl»€% »> iT ;Vl•'. !v i.<T«av C»*)l 4TeOAWt'> --. \ \\.r C I ^ 11 i ___ 17' Parc«l Skatch £■ rt ;gp- i I i- '•£ ^mfy/mevn ^ Tot John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director Lyle Oman* Building Official OAtat February 5, 1991 SllbjACt On February 1, 1991 an inspection was conducted on the luMber yard building to determine what would be required to repair the leaking roof. It is my opinion that the building is beyond repair and if someone was to request a permit to repair a building in this condition on private property, I would deny the permit and commence hazardous building action. Structural deficiencies and deterioration starts at the roof and continues down to the foundation. * Roofing is leaking and is past its life expectancy. - Roof Sheathing is rotted - Rafters are overspan and rotted. - Beams are overspan and rotted and many are spliced together at mid-span instead of being a solid member between bearing points. - Posts are rotted, undersized and are no longer plusib. - Foundation is crumbling and bearing points are unstable. - The whole building is leaning toward Bro%m Road. It is my recommendation that all equipment and materials should be removed as soon as possible and the building be secured until it can be removed. r ■" "^" tl I 13091.10 TOi DAIBi Mayor and Citi juncil * , Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrate^ \ Fabruary 6, 1991 '■ffi» SUUaCTs 1990 Corporate Report Attachmant: A. 1990 corporate Dated February 6, 1991 Attached please find the staff's Corporate Report for 1990. Plaasa faal free to ask any questions you may have or corrections that you like to make or additions that you have. ALTBRHATIVES 1. Accept. 2. Amend and accept. 3. Take no action. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by __> seconded by Counci 1» aftei making any commentSi recommends adoption of the 1990 Corporate Report. Ayes __» Nays __. r.f- 12391.2 ov CITY OF ORONO CORPORATE REPORT 1990 m ^ ,s'' A. City of Orono Statistical Index (1/91) B. Personnel Directory - 1990 C. Tax Capacity Comparison - 1990/91 D. 1990 End of the Year Investment Report E. 1990 End of the Year Cash Balance Report (Preliminary) INTRODUCTION - Spearheaded by the Baltic Republics the euphoria 19^9 iaced the grim realities of transition to a market economy for the Eastern Europeans and the reoccurence of ethnic and power struggles within the various ancient provinces of the Soviet Union itself. Despite the setbacks of the various countries and the republics, the world wide direction appeared to be positive. This however was darkened by the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait on August 2, 1990. In response to this, the United Nations under u.S. leadership marshalled forces to the area. This was first to protect further aggression by Iraq into other countries and secondly setting a deadline for the removal of Iraq from Kuwait. The January 15th deadline passed with no movement by Iraq. As a result military force is now being used in an attempt to evict Iraq from Kuwait. Added to this the year end brought dissention among the Baltic Republics, particularly Lithuania, and a concern for the Soviet economy that could not get even elemementary goods of from one part of the country where supplies exist to satisify the needs in other parts of the country. These concerns have resulted in the more conservative elements asserting control and perhaps slowing down, if not reversing, the direction towards democracy and market economies within at least the Soviet Union itself. On the economic front the United States, together with much of the rest of the world, noticed a slowdown in activities that had been predicted as "near at hand" in each of the last five years. These were aggravated by the tensions in the Persian Gulf and higher energy prices. Additional economic concerns related to the growing estimates of the cost of the Savings and Loan bail out. Towards year end, this was joined by concern in the Banking industry because of some significant bank failures together with credit watches of certain large banks. The mid-fall budget crisis on the national level, just prior to elections, resulted in increases in selected taxes together with spending cuts. However, because of the budget agreement, the proposed budget cuts were not acted on at the same time. On the environmental front the Federal Government adopted a Clean Air Act which was the first significant update in 20 years. This has attempted to address the problems of acid rain and air pollution. The bill will, over the longterm, cause shifts in expenses to more thoroughly address the problem than has been done in the past. M Minnesota* whose economy has been strongest of the Ui- - West, did towards the end of the • ^a: began to show the effects on economic slowdown as measured in tax col ’ e'~tio.;s and unemployment. Economic slowdowns in the Mid :est were less intense than in other parts of the country particularly on the East coast. This has had a decided effect on the State's anticipated revenues which have become much more economically sensitive over the recent years. This became a cair.onigr issue in the fall of '90 as to whether one, in fact, did exi?t. Fst i.matec of this shortfall f^r the remaining six months of 19 ’?i equate to about $200 million. Further indications for the r ier... uti starting July 1991 through June of 1992 place the figur (.nat period at about $1 to $1.2 billion. Initial propcsals to solve the current biennium problem include reductioi.s of additional Local Government Aid (LGA) and Homestead and Agricultural Credit Adjustment (HACA). These proposals are having a significant impact on several com.munities and amount to approximately 2% of their Property Tax plus Local Government Aid base. In addition there is a proposal to reduce the amount of transpo:tation monies available to cities through the Municipal State Aid (MSA) fund. It is estimated that this would amount to about 6% of the cities proposed amount for 1991-92. For the most part the significant portion of this in the LGA/HACA reduction will not have an effect on Orono as all of its money feom the State in these areas had been removed during the 1989 session. (The city will sustain a minor loss in* this catagory of about $2900 in a permanent base reduction for the 1991 budget yf^ar. Which was done by the 1990 Legislative session.) The resolution of tl.e much larger '91-93 budget proble . oiay well result in a substantial change in the Local Government - State Aid structure in order to realize the kind of dollar savings needed without substantial tax increases. Fall elections on the State level resulted in perhaps two of the most unusual campaigns within current memory for both governorship and US Senator, with Minnesota being one of the few states where the anti-incumbent feeling resulted in replacements. On the state level the election of an IR Governor, balances the Legislative and the Governorship between the two parties. In addition to having an Impact as to the means to resolving the budget problems it is expected it will also have a significant impact on the redistricting to be done the upcoming legislative session. This should result in greater power through this redistricting being gt.en to the seven county Metro area particularly the suburbs. Had both legislative houses and the Governorship been in OFL control there may well have been several "strattle* districts created from the suburban areas to both the central cities and also outstate areas in order to minimize the growth of suburban metropolitan power in an effort to retain legASlative DPL control. (It should be noted that *'he balance of population in the 1990 census shifted, the seven ,:nty Metro area now possessing 52% of the population of the state.) Acuivity in Orono from the economic standpoint apart from new sir^gle family homes did not notice much slowdown in actual revenue until tne November-December timeframe when building and zoning and other permits began to taper off markedly from last year. With ever growing popularity the City's Board of Review again resulted in an increased attendance over the *89 Board. Valuations were generally up 7%. The increased tax levels as a result of both 1989 and 1990 Legislative action in shifting more local government costs in the Metro area onto the property tax piqued people's interest. The budget process itself for 1991 lasted from June through the middle of December. While the budget for 1990 which was done during 1989 was the first use of the Truth in Taxation it was only a required public notice. The budget for 1991 was the first in which generic notices were ■ailed to each address. (It is anticipated in future years that these generic notices will attempt to calculate more closely in dollars the impact of the various jurisdictions increase on the properties). This year the city had two budget hearings at which appcoxinately 40 people attended. The City adopted a general fund budget increase of 4% for 1991. This levy over a market value increase of 11% and a tax capacity increase of 8.8% will result in an estimated tax capacity rate (formally mill rate) for 1991 of 11.86 which is down from the 12.77 rate for 1990. Other taxing jurisdictions on Orono property owners; such as school district# County and miscellaneous jurisdictions all showed rate increases for 1991. 1990 FINANCIAL REVIEW Revenues continued to exceed expenditures in 1990 with first year that both revenues again exceeding budget figures and expenditures came in below budget estimates. The estimated difference between the actual revenues and expenditures is $94,933. Current tax cc‘lections for the year were down to 94.5% eoioared to 95.4% in *89, although total tax collections were at 98.6% of budget the 1989 ‘'Igure was 97.6%. Generally, however, these result in Issues of cash flow as they are subsequently paid in later years. Investment income for the year averaged 8.57%. As part of t' ' issue related to the longterm financial picture and the finan* 'g of a city facilities a five year projection of revenues am' ^penciitures was done on a rudementary basis during 1990. Suc.5 .rejections are helpful not only for financial planning but also for determining the means for financing these facilities. The City's bond rate remained unchanged again, being Aal. In addition, the City for its 1989 financial report received the Government Finance Officers tssociation Certificate of 'Jhievement for the t>,rd year in a row. For 1990 Orono again remained having the lowes'c tax .• acity rate in Hennepin County for all communities over 600. A; ..oted in Attachment C has a tax capacity rate that is only 45% below that of the highest surrounding city. This results in a net tax savings for i' p r I . comparably valued homes between the two communities of 16%. The financial projection exercise also pointed out the impact of continued levy limits so that current revenues would be outstripped by growth in anticipated expenditure costs and need for growth in selected positions. As a result, if levy limits remain in effect the city will need to employ a combination of alternative revenue sources including a wider use of service and utility charges together with developing a financing package or use of reserves for facilities in order to provide longterm stability to appropriately handle any increased desired expenditure needs. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT The significant slowdown which was expected during 1990 was particularly evident in the new home area with only 30 new single family residential permits issued. This is down 56% from the 51 in 1989. However, the total of 37 building permits for new buildings, because of new commercial and institutional buildings, resulted in only a decrease of 28% for the primary buildings and only a 7% decrease in total building permit fees 1990. (The actual fee did exceed the budgeted figure for 19?' Additional items of interest in the community development a£«a include the following: New subdivision resulted in 30 new lots Michael Gaffron did a study of the number of lot divisions potentially under the current zoning code which range from 600 to 950. The number of zoning and subdivision applications totaled 131 which is 7.6% increase over 1989. Preliminary census information placed the city's April 1990 population at 7,213 approximately 200 below where the city felt the population might be. Adopted for 1991 a new position of Septic Systems Manager . Undertook planning studies in the following areas: Facilities of other governmental entities Telecommunications facilities Comprehensive Plem #3 Shoreland regulations Lakeshore width Sign ordinance Adopted further regulations related to the commercial activities of the term "transient merchants ”. Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Comprehensive plan - Spent substantial Council and staff tine reviewing. reacting and proposing suggestions to the draft plan. While the LMCD Board did adopt the plan at their October 1990 meeting the city continutes to be involved in promoting changes to the plan which would have the LMCD remain within the bounds of their original conception. Held one joint meeting between the Planning Commission and Council together with having them to the workshop on facilities and on Highway 12. Continued to work with residents in the Stubbs Bay area to determine the level of interest in going forward with the sewer project for the area. The City worked with the Orono Baseball Association which resulted in premiere playing facility in the Bederwood Park area for baseball and softball for the community. After substantial study the Park Commissio../ then Councilr undertook to enact a new park dedication ordinance which represented the first change in the approach for fees since 1975. Park Commission also presented a master plan for its trails and bikeways and initial work was done in order to obtain various easements for the eventual system. PUBLIC SAFETY The initial cou<^se for the DARE program was presented by Officer Cornick in the Orono school system during the beginning of 1990. An extended version has begun during the fore part of 1991. This pro9ram. targeted at Sth grades is in addition to the Officer Friendly Program which is done in the spring and targeted for the 3rd and 4th grade groups. Lower activity on Lake Minnetonka due to lower lake levels resulted in somewhat less water related activity. The number of OWI arrests made during 1990 were 171, down 22% from 1989. In total the number of citations were 3,063. The amount of incidents reported were 6,592. There was one traffic fatality during 1990. The animal control function had a total of 475 calls during the year for a total 127 citations among the four communities. This in comparison to 334 calls and 83 citations during 1989. Emergency medical services responses during 1990 for the department were 315. with response times by North Memorial for Advance Life Support 305 calls ranging from 2 minutes to 25. (Average call response by North is about 11 minutes.) In Orono there was one major structure fire out of a total of 11 fires resulting in a $200,000 loss with no loss of life. There were a total of 150 fire calls and 50 rescue calls. In addition the following events are of note: Appointment of third Lieutenant to Letter address the organizational structure and at the same time flattening ■i. that structure from what it was four years ago. The Reserve program has 18 active members. Establishment and implementation of a canine dog program with Officer Dan Fischenich and Baron. Enactment of a prohibition on cigarette vending machines in the community. The announced retirement in December of Chief Melvin Rilbo who will retire June 30, 1991, thus allowing time to search for a replacement. PHYSIC.\L SERVICES/TRANSPORTATION The significant focus during 1990 has been the beginning of '.he Highway 12 corridor selection process with the establishment of Policy, Technical and Citizens committees by the MnDOT sponsored process. The process which fully got underway in July has developed initial goals and objectives; presented preliminary corridors; and preliminary traffic forca^ts over the next 20 years. It is expected that this process will come to a conclusion during mid to late 1991 which may or may not result in a preferred corridor. In other transportation related items the City did act upon a petition of the residents to take over for public maintenenace Lafayette Ridge which was a previously considered private road in an urban area. In addition the City enacted an ordinance permitting the public passage over all private roads in the community. At years end it was entertaining making public a private street in a rural area in order to provide access to a potential new subdivision. Recycling response by the community continues to grow with 60% regularly participating and a diversion of 716 tons. This represents a 22.9% percentage recycled which remains above that established by the County for 1990 of 10% and the 1991 goal of 16%. The City initiated in 1990 its composting operation which consists of accepting materials during selected days between spring and fall at the City Hall site and with a compost pile on the city's old s^wer treatment plant site. For 1990 this incldded milfoil ^ . composting from the LMCD*s removal efforts. In addition the City set the stage for collection of selected plastics during 1991. Additional items of note include: further progress in the modified Public Works structure :o create a department with personnel trained and utilized in all areas of public works including streets, utilities and parks. This change over the last couple years has made the department much more flexible. The city during the 1990 budget year acquired its first street sweeper which replaced a contract service. This .S •P i. -.V' allowed an improvement in the street P"|f irilVh\V t‘S ?hrttir=^u/ron ‘?:?t*;al^‘ra,^»:^ contract basis. syaten Installed In the forepart of 1990. Snow removal operations were further improved by an underbody blade to one of the trucks which allows for improved plowing during initial light snowfalls together with aiding clean up efforts. ADMINISTRATION Imoag the Items of note in this area during 1990 include: installation of a new phone system which brought t^ city's telecommunications from the 1950 s to the 199 Development of the "Orono Resource ’ as a document of pSllcyf procedures and objectives for the city for use by the staff. Purther progress for the city appointment and report of a Facilities Additionally the City undertook an option on a selected property and the architect put together a compendium of documents to date on the study. Conduct a contest for a new city logo together with selecting a winning design. continued efforts to settle the contested «""«*»tion of the Long Lake sewer plant from the Orono to Lake jurisdiction. This was dealt with both in negotatlve sessions and also a ^Vimr%h^ the Municipal Board in September. At Board* partway through the hearing* directed to go back and attempt to negotiate a ®®^J^®"®J*^* ConUnuatlon of these discussions are expected during the forepart of 1991. The City after a competitive request for proposals established a Flexible Benefits program for its cjjy employees effective beginning of *91 in fiioLlSemployees to take advantage of pre-tax benefits allowed under Section 125 of the IRS regulations. Selected amendments to the City ’s personnel rules in the area of vacation schedule and accural. r- Continued to work towards transition to a compensation system that would meet the objectives of the State’s pay equity program. The program which was adopted by the city in 1988 has realized substantial transition for most of the employees on to that program. Adoption of 20 year franchise agreements for both Northern States Power and Wright Hennepin Electric Cooperative. CONCLUSION w While 1990 began with significant world wide changes# it was a year that also pointed out that transitions entail downside risks and that hope for positive change can not always be realized without struggle and effort. Expectations for a short recession nay well hinge on not only events in the Middle East but also in econonic transitions for the Eastern European countries. 1990 through many of these events emphasized not only the world wide Immediacy of communications but also the effects of those communications on the preception and decisions of people around the world. These often have significant economic impacts not only in consumer behavior but also in instant communications. Improved telecommunications and fascmile macnines allow commerce between one seemingly remote location of the world to another. As with anything, new technologies bring both positives and negatives in the overall drama of events both on a personal and a world wide basis. i" CITY 'Jf fy^nuo - JTATHTtCAt IlftJtl ItM ACniAL Ifll I9t2 M»1 MM r«4 TMI u:/ll> AIM tSTf ••M Afei «««7 MMM C«Mlcn 14/lt •C MvvrM li« Opmv #y M m«A r ll/ll • mtw Cvmil TvtalA/l MIO Tfii mt M20 tmtn Wm * mi mm wnmrf ti«f» II M/ll mr ifi 111! Ills Itfl «Tt 1141 1171 1411 1474 IMf Ml I MIM INilliai If •l.ffi JO S.Mf If 4.ilf 41 M f.fll U.ift fValM imillMal l f.li 1 f.19 1 O.f) MMfl/ mm MiltIfM II falM IIHill«i il Iff l.41f I7f 1.174 no 1.47 2tf Iff 1.7 4.147 it/lMf PfMflfl ir Milt la lffl» Ita oa IMl «art«t falaa-fctaal 171.14 IM.41 liHlllaafl-tatlMta valual 141.4 347.9 Maaaaff valaa*A«t«alM) dMIllaafl-taUMM fmm rapaalty • Mtafl tftla^ta 70.4 74.7 44.1 99.1 11.4 11.4 f.4 Iftteatf iMf I l.tf 1.1 1.4 II.ff 14.4 1.4 4.Iff 4.J 1.1 1.4 I 14.Iff 11.1 ttaaff ll.fff 14.1 4.1 4.1 1.4 4.4 •nil Canttaata Il vitlMt caatracta f.fff If.4 4.4 14.1 11.7 -4.) uy y gMIMW|f f I liaf taMtltatlea tltaUaa) Ml Ml fM itiMMBf mi rta«l Mipatlfy m vjssse^vrzxxsz: sss.:s ItaMliaM mmmm m» mi it.UI wtmm i UM to .to Sr i!yf5S4By*S&C! jSfKTiM* ^ •MtMMf wmmmrnm If l.ff ff l-ft* ••if %• Ml Mb •• Cat Immy Halt a«fflaa. • aaM alm gtoii^.tojUg totto to Mtoto • arscittrs tor- lit a I' 1Orartaf11/41 Aamafaf 2/44 Apaafaf 1/44 Aaaafaf 1/44 1/47 4/4? faaafaf l/4f Avaafaf 4/44 1/44 iMiifaf 4/If Aaaafaf 1/44 Aaaafaf 7/44 mmmdmrn 1/41 ^77P(^^ 1 » # ^1944 1907 1944 1440 1444 12/21/44 1 1441 r«aitcTi€47f :t4i Iff!tiff 414#1 IMfofll2444)fff72447)10 7)70 7444 79)0 7444 •ffff- 3704 *444470247172721232447 374 fOtOf 72)lf Iff# M04 1904 144) tat 1 IfM 1020 1012 1474 fill 2170 14)4 1404 1)14 2779 4IM 2474 am 1414 17441174139 lilf 14)4 tm tiff 2I«2 2140 1144 2414 1477 1149139 i?if im l?M 900 44f Off 144 iff iff 14 44 44 1)11 44 nt))f if 4f M/f9 14 44 44 12 1)44 1)41 1 If )f 44 if 11.4 4.1 D.l U.4 11.4 4.4 14.4)7 4.1 lf.4 f.f/ft 1 7 1 1 9 1 I7|1 1 i 1/ft 0.174 3 0.7 .3 0 0.2 (1.21 1 t •t.l 274 319 2)4 2)4 244 244 (}7f)194 Ilf 190 )ff/ft 1.4 9.3 7.4 4.4 44 2.4 (4.41 7.4)I )1 344.1)149.74 441.7)4)1.0 474 917 - 'iff ’•• 414.73 444 4)1 171 • Ml iff iff.44 101.1 100.92 141.4 147.)SwItcM ta raa CafaeAtv 4f/M Of 111 114.7 •m Iff 11.M M.)4 11.4 (il 14.f » •m If.ff “ 14.4 1 If.I If.l 1.412 2.24 7 1.322 I.44I 1.711 l.fl 1.44 9.3 17.4 2.4 4 It.Iff1 9.94 44 ' 1.4 4 a *'7 2.12 2.21 2.44 1.41 1.7)).14 I.I? 1.741 2.13 1.244 2. lit 2.71 f . -• -0.3 19.1 9.4 2.4 17.1 1 2.0 9 2.2 1.24 1.44 2.1 1.9 2.4 2.0 1.4 ri.413 1.4(1.11 1.4 t.l 1.4 l.f 3.1 0 4.)4.)4.4 414.fl 1 4 4 4 -3.4 -.2 --1 •-- 4.1 9.7 4.9 4.7 4.4 1.4(4.71 • l.f 4.1 4.4 4.1 l.f 4.9 4.4 4.4 4.4(4.73 4.4 f.f f.i l.ll 1.94 2.07 2.24 1.31(1.Ill 1.44 l.f?t.l l.f 1.71 1.41 1.44 1.41(1.44)l.lf I.If t.lf -4.1 0.4 10.7 4.7 7.1 if.i in 4.4 f.f l.f 1.4)1.4 l.tf 2.01 l.)4 1 l.f t.M i.ff 2. 7 -II.1 9 --• 4.7 •4.4 4.4 l.f f.f 1.S7 1.74 i.Tiffi 1.444ICI 2.41 1 I.U l.tf I.M i.it 1.71 1.41 1.44 1.4)11.Ill laf l.tf a.if • I 1 finnafhueur B 1990 PERSONNEL DIARY Achievement Awards Teri Naab - Municipal Certification - Minnesota Municipal Clerks Association. Government Finance Officers Award - Receipt of Certificate of Achievement for the 1989 report which represents the third year in a row that that has been received. rr \ V \ \ r f i: ,'Si . s- Position strength Changes - The following represent changes to the personnel strength that occured during 1990: Conversion of the Recorder position to a contract basis and employment of a secretary full time. Establishment of a new position for 1991 for a septic system manager. Althouoh not a change, 1990 represented the first year in many ^*ears that public works was up to its fully authorized strength. New Employees - Jay Oembowski - Patrol Officer - Activated December 1990 US Marine Corps Ricky Karnitz - Part time patrol officer Tim Roberts - Temporary patrol officer Steve Weckman • Temporary septic program manager Lin Vee - Secretary Administration Scott Ober&inger - Public Works maintenance Gregg Palmer - Public Works maintenance Employee Departures - Laurie Seheffler - Converted from the Recorder/Secretary to a contract Recorder. John Sass - Retirement 1 «*** I- i i I P fc •; k •1 H I'V S' if fkff il B"-- jlnl' T-. Pronotions - J. Marc Fritzler - Lieutenant Police department Conaissions Park: Virginia Sweatt - Resigned fron service Richard Flint - Selected as Chair Alex Vongries - Selected as Vice Chair Susan Wilson > Appointed Planning Conunission: Ed Brown > .tesigned Candace Rowlette - Selected as rural representative In addition during 1990 the duties of Assessing which began the year with Mr. Paul Smith, completed the yfjar with Mr. Rolf Erickson both on a contract basis. rr V. 'hI' 2691.4 TVKi0^e7J rd GCmMRTIVE 1MC lOmS PGR SDRKnDDC NSIICIFALITIES 1990 (Tax Capacity Rates) 1990 Conparison to Orono City Rate Est Tbtal Tax Bill Difference Similar Value Prqperties Due to Cities Levy 1991 Estimated Rates Comparison to Orono's Rate Ocono 12.772 --11.865 Hound 17.919 k 40.3%5.4%17.343 46% r?<HM tonka Btach 16.805 + 28.5%3.4%17.070 43.5% a^lng Park 22.227 + 74.0%10.0%20.865 75.8% litoyaata 17.658 + 38.2%5.1%16.944 42.8% Long Laka 28.250 +121.2%16.3%29.312 147% Madina 18.022 + 41.1%5.5%15.224 28.3% Plyaouth 15.896 + 24.4%3.2%15.077 27% Mlnnatcnka 15.766 + 23.4%3.1%17.474 42.2% Bxoalaior 20.110 + 57.4%7.7%20.452 72.3% Shorawood 20.299 + 58.9%7.9%20.454 72.4% Mimatriata 16.134 + 26.3%3.5%18.186 53.2% mi.. 2791.2 TOt Mark E, Bernhardson, City Administrator FSOMt Tom Kuehn# Finance Director 0A1B:February 1, 1991 SOBJBCT: 1990 Annual Investment Report Attachments: A. Investment Portfolio at 12/31/90 B. Earned Interest vs. Revenue Budget 1990 PURPOSE - To comply with the annual investment reporting requTrements set fort?', in the City's l.ivestment policy. DISCUSSION - The unaudited statement of earned interest for the yearen3e9 December 31, 1990 shows that the City earned $650,637 for mil funds compared to budgeted amounts of $586,350 for a favorable variance of $64,287. The earned interest amount for 1990 is an increase of $139,693 over 1989 and is due mostly from increases in the 1989 Construction and 1989 Bond Funds, which OKMiies were invested for the entire year 1990 as opposed to only about four months in 1989 when the bond issue was Initiated. The average yield for the year was 8.57%. The investment portfolio, at cost, on December 31, 1990 waj $7,880,551 compared to $7,915,275 on December 31, 1989. The decrease in investments was primarily due to a reduction in unspent construction monies from the highway 12 sewer and water construe ton projects and from decreases in amounts available from thi various improvement bond funds. The preliminary projected Interest income for 1991 is $508,390 for all funds based on a decline in rates and the expenditure of the majority of the remaining 1989 bond proceeds for sewer and water improvements in the Highway 12 area west of Long Lake. TOt FMNi Mayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrat<S|[^ Forwarded for Council information to comply with Investment policy requirements. REPORT NBR. IVSTOlO J4 INVESTMENT TYPE NUMBER S932S1 FEO NAT MORT ASN 781404 COMMERCIAL PAPER 602111 COMMERCIAL PAPER 605172 COMMERCIAL PAPER 354626 CERT OF DEPOSIT 601910 COMMERCIAL PAPER 313311 FED HOME LOAN BO 731930 CERT OF DEPOSIT 175667 FED FARM CR BANK S93364 FED 'lOME LOAN BD 607260 CERT OF DEPOSIT 607262 CERT OF DEPOSIT 313311 FED FARM CR BANK 593967 FED NAT MORT ASN 596256 FED FARM CR BANK 593267 FED HOME LOAN BO 200560 CERT OF DEPOSIT 700762 STRIP COUPN-USTB 222655 STRIP COUPN>USTB 603440 CERT OF DEPOSIT 696357 CERT OF DEPOSIT 593073 FED HOME LOAN BO 761165 STRIP-RESFO CORP 603579 CERT OF DEPOSIT 669946 FED FARM CR BANK 575602 FED FARM CR BANK 676466 FED FARM CR BANK 636520 FED NAT MORT ASN 657366 FED FARM CR BANK 604156 MN HFA IMP-TAXBL VENDOR PRUDENTIAL-BACHE NORWEST BANCORP MARQUETTE BANK MARQUETTE BANK PAINE WEBBER MARQUETTE BANK DAIN BOSWORTH DAIN BOSWORTH FIRST MPLS PRUDENTIAL-BACHE MARQUETTE BANK MARQUETTE BANK DA IN BOSWORTH PRUDENTIAL-BACHE MARQUETTE BANK PRUDENTIAL-BACHE DAIN BOSWORTH PRUDENTIAL-BACHE DAIN BOSWORTH MARQUETTE BANK FIRST MPLS PRUDENTIAL-BACHE DAIN BOSWORTH MARQUETTE BANK FIRST MPIS MARQUETTE BANK FIRST MPLS FIRST MPLS FIRST MPLS DAIN BOSWORTH INVESTMENT REPORT BY MATURITY DATE 5S Of STATUS ACTIVE PAGE PURCHASE MATURITY DATE DATE 12/10/87 10/02/90 10/10/90 11/14/90 03/02/90 12/13/90 03/28/90 04/16/86 05/01/90 05/25/88 11/29/90 11/29/90 07/02/90 09/10/87 09/04/90 10/05/88 01/21/87 08/19/87 08/29/90 10/26/90 07/30/90 12/08/87 09/12/90 10/25/90 04/19/90 05/02/9005/23/90 01/11/90 03/15/90 12/20/90 01/10/91 01/16/91 01/30/91 01/31/91 02/16/91 03/13/91 03/25/91 04/14/91 05/01/91 05/28/91 05/28/91 05/28/91 07/01/91 08/12/91 09/03/91 09/25/91 12/31/91 02/15/92 02/15/92 03/27/92 07/30/92 11/25/92 04/15/93 10/15/93 04/19/94 05/02/9405/23/94 12/12/94 03/15/95 08/01/95 COUPON YIELD COST PAR VALUE DAILY INTEREST 8 37500 8 273 1 3 199.937 50 200 000 00 46 527 8 7 98335 7 98335 322 . 42 1 00 322 421 00 71 4995 8 204 19 8 204 19 499.256 89 499 256 89 113 7765 7 985 83 7 98583 403.026 58 403 026 58 89 4025 8 49000 8 69130 94.723 55 95 000 00 22 4042 7 54986 7 54986 1,472,212 50 1 ,472 212 50 308 7475 8 65000 8 55442 300.000 OC 300 000 00 72 0833 8 50000 8 38356 100.000 00 100 000 00 23 6111 8 70000 8 58082 200.000 00 200 000 00 48 3333 8 50000 8 35543 200 125 00"!200 000 00 47 2222 7 93423 7 93423 96.184 26 )96 i 84 26 21 1985 7 73588 7 73588 96 .276 96 276 10 20 6881 8 30000 8 208 79 200.000 03 200 000 00 46 nil 8 70000 8 7 3736 199 , 062 50 200 000 00 48 3333 8 05000 7 96154 400.000 no 400 000 00 89 4444 8 80000 8 6551 1 100.281 25 100 000 00 24 4444 8 56400 8 56400 100 000 00 100 000 00 23 7 8899939 75 9 93975 206 457 00 2 06 457 00 5 7 0034846388846388100.721 16 100 721 16 23 68019100009lUOOO95,000 00 95 000 00 24 0139829000820000100.000 00 100 000 00 23 0278 8 80000 8 67945 200.000 00 200 000 00 48 8889903985903985500.991 00 500 991 00 125.801691250090000095.000 00 95 .000 00 24 .0799894000881753200.000 00 200 .000 00 49 6667925000911704300.000 00 300 .000 00 77 083394400093043 1 400.000 00 400 .000 00 104 8889810000825945398,875 00 400 000 00 92 22228800U0867945100.000 no 100 .000 00 24 44448eocoo84 7 75 1 200.000 00 200 , 000 00 47 7 7 7 8 REPORT TOTAL 7.880,551 29 • •7 .882 .546 49* •1 . 840 1955 ^1 [: [ I' i h. III If I IfK C. J a ATTACHMENT *B INVESTMENT BANNED INTEREST COMPARED TO BUDGET YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1990 FUND Budget Actual Over (Under) Budget Prior Year Actual General Park Inp & Equip Outlay Building Outlay Permanent Imp Outlay 1989 Sewer - Water Const 1966-76 Imp Bonds 1980 Imp Bond 1982 Imp Bond 1985 Imp Bond 1989 Revenue Bond Water Operating Sewer Operating Golf Operating (a) (b) TOTALS $195,000 $195,085 $85 $188,916 10,300 13,161 2,861 11,399 22,000 16,867 (5,133)21,695 30,000 38,832 8,832 58,886 45,300 55,851 10,551 37,345 98,000 126,935 28,935 19,618 44,300 35,777 (8,523)44,817 36,800 35,535 (1,265)37,990 8,600 10,335 1,735 13,762 10,900 14,115 3,215 14,240 36,250 41,980 5,730 6,699 8,400 9,510 1,110 8,905 40,000 55,628 15,628 46,653 500 1,026 526 19 $586,350 $650,637 $64,287 $510,944 IIIIMNIIHIIIIIIIIIIIIMMU11= =3 S3 9 S S SS3333S3 Notes:(a) The actual 1990 amounts include transfer of $147,104 interest earned from the Building Outlay Fund as operations support to the General Fund. (b) The 1909 Sewer-Water Construction and 1989 Revenue Bond Funds are to be reflected in the Water and Sewer Operating Funds for report presentation. 13091.11 TO: FROM: DATS: Mayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato January 30, 1991 SOBJBCT: Receipt of Donation - DARE Program \ V-’" \ Attachment: k A. Receipt of Donation Memo/Chief Kilbo Dated 1/23/91 B. Draft Letter of Appreciation C. Minnesota DARE Letter 7/6/90 D. Proposal Letter ISSUE - Determination as to whether Council desires to accept a donation to the DARE program. INTRODUCTION - Staff has been presented with a check for $1,000 for the DARE program by Mr. Iverson. As is the case in the past, these donations to the City are presented to Coucil to determine whether they desire to accept that donation or not. If this donation is accepted it would be used to defray some of the expenses related to the DARE program including promotional materials including sweatshirts and a potential motivational speaker for the 5th grade for their graduation in addition to Hubert Humphrey. (See Attachments C and D) Additionally publicity will be undertaken to attract parents and friends to graduation ceremonies. ALTERNATIVES - 1. Accept. 2. Decline. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that Council accept the donatFon and <^irect a letter of thanks to Mr. Iverson for this generous donation. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, Council authorize the staff to accept the donation on its behalf from Mr. Iverson and directs staff to send a note of thank you to Mr. Iverson. Ayes _, Nays _. cc: Chief Kilbo Thomas Kuehn, Finance Director Officer Cornick ■;V ORAF- Janu^rv 23, i?91 PUT Corooration 1500 Park Road - Eio:: iiO Chanhasaan, f^inreecta ‘■572^ ATTN: Mr, Airrad Ivaracn D«ar Mr. Zvsraon. It is with great aocreciatior .ra;: we write to /ou to acknowledge receipt o-f ycur cnaci' o* t=l,000.'X* for the DARE Program. This will .-noat oortairlv this progran -nc'/inq r-r, r6' MNNESOTA OA^l OFFICERS ASSOCIATION P I July 6, 1990 J«ni« JusliiCrMtivlty, No Lisits, Inc. 19108 Cloorvlow Drive Hinnetonka, MN 55345 Deer Janie: the basics in building that v-lationshi|; again ^ that You sucresOsTt as I's sure you do sany^ jaany» sany tines in aany 4ifforent nisrss in touching hearts and nin^ and noving people to becone people again and not just accoaplishers in our nulti*task lives. that you will touch sany aore. .V 'jC 3^>’ Janie Jasin July 6, 1990 Pace 2 Our reviewers at the end had a couple of <|uestions* One of then was what topics would you like covered next year and many of the responses were similar to the following* another emotional uplifting presentation like Jasin's excellent, inspiring, wonderful, super presentation of Jasin's Of the grading scales 1-5, yours were almost all 5's. The inspiration and, again, the warmth will help reinvigorate officers who were tired from a yearns worth of teaching and running and will regenerate their efforts next year to again reach out to our youth with the DARE Program. The other thing I'd like to relate to you Janie is that my wife was observing in the background and Cheryl said that it was really great to see how you were able to involve all the offi'* who aren't normally a group that lets loose and becomes tot involved with someone else pulling the strings or calling t shots and here you had them up with arms up in the air and t- moving about and doing some dance and releasing themselves to held and moved by other officers. It was really a unique and she thought really impacting presentation. Again, thank you for such a thoughtful and thought provoking presentation. Sincerely, Richard B. Anderson Vice President Minnesota DARE officers Association RA: jw ■; - ■ ■ •% p 6 January 1991 Proposal for March 22, 1991 DARE GRADUATION JANI6 JASIN MOT>V*riON*«- HUMO^'fiT 250 5th Graders and Parents MINDED/ 19106 Cl«or V <?w Qf .♦ M-nnw’OH''* MN fOlZ) 4/4-1050 LovE/ Laughter and special thoughts on the relationships that count for a caring WURLD. I WILL uD THE Emcee's tasks/ the speaking and TO provide for an all over incredible event TOTALLING 1 1/2PROVIDE ME wn DETAILS AND SCRIPTS TO WELCUMt SKIP HUMPHREY AND POSSIBLY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. RESPECT/ ADMIRATION/ CARING AND CONNECTING ARE MY OBJECTIVES FOR THIS EVENT. Cost 500.00 Janie Jasin ii-.. K- r I % 2491.1 <><58 ^Ca9 TOt FBOM: DATBx Mayor and City Council Mark E, Bernhardson, City Adninistrat February 4, 1991 % SUBJECT: Compensation Adjustment > Lt. Fritzler Attachment: A. Kilbo Memo Dated 1/25/91 ISSUE - Formal approval of compensation increase for Lt. FrT¥^er. INTRODUCTION - Mark Fritzler completed his 1st year as a lieutenant on February 1» 1991. He has performed at a satisfactory level and therefore qualifies for an increase to $19.20/hour compensation. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by the Orono City Council formally authorize the increase from $18.26 to $19.20 under the 1990 Supervisor's Contract for Lt. Fritzler based on his satisfactory performance effective 2/1/91. Ayes __, Nays __. cc:Finance Department Police Chief Personnel File J TOs FROM: DATS: 2491.3 Mayor and City Clerk Mark E* Bernhardson# City Administrate/^ ^ February 4, 1991 ’’OlllQ SnBJBCT: Personal Watercraft - Proposed Legislation I Attachment: A. Representative Steve Smith Letter Dated 1/29/91 ISSUE - Present to Council for comment legislation proposed by Representative Smith related to personal watercraft generally referred to as "jet ski". INTRODUCTION - Attached is proposed legislation being introduced by Representative Smith. He would desire either the City's joint or Council members individual response to this legislation. This legislation has been reviewed by the Police department and it is their recommendation that such legislation would be helpful in dealing with some of the noise problems associated with some of these craft. ALTERNATIVES 1. Comment. 2. Endorse. 3. Take no action. 4. Table until February 25, 1991 RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that after Council makes any comments tha t staff be directed to forward tliose to Representative Smith. Ayes __, Nays __. cc: Chief Kilbo V' i • ■ J. h'f \ SIttt Rtpruiiiiktlvt 6t»MM«M niMct4M Minnesota House of Represoitatives J/VU 3 0 1991January 29, 1991 Attention: Clerk of Crystal Bay P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Clerk: Enclosed please find a letter addressed to your Mayors and CounciImembers as well as proposed legislation for there review. Please place the letter and proposed legislation in your council's next packet under informational items (not necessarily requiring council consideration or action) and inviting your council's input. Thank you for your cooperation. Since;Lnc^ly, j / Steve Smith State Representative ■^.1 yr r'' W-w 01/16/91 (REVISOR ) XX/MC 91-0670 K )■ •f } If!?' 2 3 4 5 6 A bill for an act r«latln9 to watercraft; re9ulatin9 the use and operation of personal watercraft: amending ’innesota Statutes 1990, section S6B.OOS* by addiig subdivisions; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 06B. 7 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: B Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 1990, section 86B.005, is 9 amended by adding a subdivision to read: 10 Subd. 14a. (PERSONAL WATERCRAFT.1 "Personal watercraft" 11 means a swtorboat which uses an inboard motor powering a water 12 let pump, and is designed to be operated by a person or persons 13 sitting, standing, or kneeling on the craft, rather than the 14 conventional manner of sitting or standing inside the motorboat. 15 Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 1990, section B68.00S, is 16 amended by adding a subdivision to read: 17 Subd. 16a. (SLOW-NO WAKE.) "Slow-no wake" means operation 18 of a watercraft at the slowest possible speed necessary to 19 maintain steerage, but in no case greater than five miles per 20 hour. 21 Sec. 3. (86B.3131 (PERSONAL WATERCRAFT REGULATIONS.) 22 Subdivision 1. (GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.] In addition to 23 requirements of other laws relating to watercraft, it is 24 unlawful to operate or to permit the operation of a personal 25 watercraft or to use any device relating to the use of a 26 personal watercraft as follows: 01/16/91 [REVISOR ) XX/MC 91-0670 r 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 H) without each person on board th« personal watercraft waring * United States Coast Guard approved Type I, li. Hi, or V PTsonal flotation davice; ill after 6;00 p.m. daily and befora sunrise the following iiXl (3) within 150 f«et of any shoreline, dock, awimmer. twlpainq or diving ratt, at qrtattr than alow-no wake speed. * yxcapt that a parsonal watercraft may be oparatad at a ^ ^***owabla apaad within 150 faet of the shorelina for the purpose of directly accaaaing and returning from the open speed lone; (4) upon approaching within ISO feet of another watercraft, other than another personal watercraft, at greater than a slow-no wake speed; (5) to tow s person on water skis, kneeboards, inflatable PfO^tf or other device without an observer on board; (61 without the lanyard-type engine cutoff switch being sttached to the person, clothing, or personal flotation device of the operator# if the‘personal watercraft is equipped by the ■snutacturer with such a device; (7) to reaove, alter, or tamper with any part of the aprlng-loaded throttle mechanism which immediately returns the engine to an Idle speed upon release of the operator's hand from tha control or any other feature of an engine cutoff switch installed by a manufacturer; (8) jump the wake of another watercraft within 150 feet of that watercraft; (9) to chase or harass wildlife; or (101 to operate through emergent or floating vegetation at other than a slow-no wake speed. Subd« 2. (AGE OF OPERATOR.] Except in the case of an emergency^ no person under the age of 16 years shall operate or be permitted to operate a personal watercraft» regardless of horsepower, unless there is a person 18 years of age or older on board the craft. It is unlawful for the owner of any personal watercraft to perait the personal watercraft to be operated i»V ‘ . il rtlu t k 01/16/91 IREVISOP 1 XX/MC 91-0670 1 contrary to this Eubdivision. 2 Subd. 3. [OPERATOR’S PERMIT.) Except in the case of an 3 ewerqencvt no person 16 years of age or over, but less than 18 4 years ot age shall operate a personal watercraft» regardless of 5 horsepower without possessing a val.d watercraft operator's 6 perwlt as required by section B6B.30St unless there is a person 7 18 years of age or older on board the craft. It is unlawful for 8 the owner of any personal watercraft to permit the personal 9 watercraft to be operated contrary to this subdivision. 10 Subd. 4. (DEALERS AND RENTAL OPERATIONS.) (a) Dealers must 11 distribute a summary of the laws and rules governing operation 12 of personal watercraft, and provide Instruction upon request# to 13 any purchaser regarding sate operation of the personal 14 watercraft. The Instruction provided by a dealer must Include 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 the laws and rules governing personal watercraft, as well as the actual operation of the personal watercraft itself. tb> A person who offers personal watercraft for rent: (1> wav not rent a personal watercraft, regardless ot the horsepower^ to any person who is less than 16 years ot age> or who is 16 years of age or over, but less than 16 years of age and not in possession of an operator's permit required by this 22 section? 23 (2) is required to provide a summary of the laws and rules 24 governing the operation of personal watercraft and to provide 25 instruction regarding safe operation to any person renting a 26 personal watercraft. The instruction provided by a tenter siust 27 cover the laws and rules governing personal watercraft^ as well 28 as the actual operation of the personal watercraft itself? and 29 (3) is required to provide a United States Coast Guard 30 approved Type I, 11. Ill or V personal flotation device for all 31 32 33 34 35 36 persons who rent a personal watercraft, as well as all other required safety equipment at no additional cost. Sec. 4. (EFFECTIVE DATE.) Sections 1 to 3 are effective 30 days after final enactnient> except that section 3, subdivision 4, paragraph (b), clause (2), is effective 60 days after final enactment. & P- i?; fr. V-. ISSi: =.n = <V ; TO; FBOM: OATS: Mayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator February 6, 1991 i''\i, » *% SUBJECT: Request for Funding - West Suburban Mediation Center Attachment:A. West Suburban Mediation Center Letter Dated 1/28/91 B. 1991 Budget Excerpt - pg 11 ISSUE - Determination as to whether the Council desires to fund the amount requested by this organization for 1991. INTRODUCTION - At the Council's December 18# 1990 budget meeting it was determined that all non-profit non-governmental agencies who had requested funding would need to make subsequent requests for this funding. Attachment A represents the request for West Suburban Mediation Center. The amount requested is within the amount budgeted and is available from the budget in the 1991 budget. Attachment B outlines the comparison with 1990 for this organization. ALTERNATIVES 1. Authorize payment 2. Amend and authorize. 3. Table for further discussion. 4. Determine not to authorize this payment. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council authorize payment of l^or the calendar year 1991. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by _, that Council authorize the payment of $500.97 as outlined in Attachment A, as the request is within the amount budgeted for 1991. Ayes _, Nays ■ V-. 1 f-y I fe- Pf- i i i WEST SUBURBAN MEDIATION CENTE 32 Tenth Avenue South, Suite 214, Hopkins. MN_^34,V January 28.1991 I > • • Mark E Bernhardson Gty Administrator City of Orono fkMt Offioe Boi 66 CrysulBay.MN 35323 jf>N 2 9 Dear Mr Bemhard The West Suburban Mediation Center is respectfully requestmg the oontributkm of 1500 be made at your earliest convenience. We appreciate your support and would welcome r^errals to us. We also would be interested in suggestions of possible Board members to itaa from your area to promote usage Enclosed are a couple of pieces of information you might find interesting. Sincerely, Susan A. Nell Eiecutive Director enclosures \ J^*'S. .^W^4<yxt>ss^4 > / /^£!A^*S >•!' :f; 't F-"t MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENTS AN accidents Hivolvinf an injiiry MU^ be rcponol to ilie |»lkc in the cky where the accident occurred. Miiincaula Highway Traffic Regulation Law m|tiires i every driver of a motor vehklc involved in an accalent where injury or dcalli results, or wlwrc ^ damage is $500.00 or more, to send a State Accident ^ Rc|iacttutheMinncstaaDepartinentofPublicSafcty, ; Driver and Vehicle Services Division, St. Paul, MN 5SI5S. The accident form may be picked up in any ^ police department. ^ The officer's report of the accident, not tlie slate [ report which you fill out, may be seen tmly by the persons involved in tlie accident (usually tlie drivers : of tlie vehicles). All otlier persons wlm wish to vU*w the report must luve a written release from one of i he I persons listed on the repon. : Tlie report is available at tlw police departmeni, SOt^S Minnetonka Hlvd., Momlay briday lielwcen 9;(X^a in. aiul 9KW p.iii. Please wait three days for the report to he processed, or call the department at 924*2600 to find out if the report is ready. Copies of ^ the report are avaiblde for a charge of $5.00. No in- hirniatiiin will he rek-as; d over ilie letepiiiMie. In all curt o fit tiMlence, please im lude t lie case nu inla-i, i iine, date, atul location of accident. Name Address lluinefs) Drii'er License license ft__MaL 4*MtHlt'l ______________________ _____________________________________ ii'V'.vi.:’’ ---- I REQUENTLY CALLED NUMIII RS 911 FOR miKi FIRI AMUDlANCIi Si. l^iuis Park City tuiinlK ’rs: l\A\i V I ht r ................................................JlilH I'uliic Aitmiiiisirsiiiiiii.................................. *>24 Crime PrcvcniKm Unit ..................................^>24 26M .....................................................^24-2607 C rime l ip Line ..................................................^2iV W22 (ieiieral information il.i> lime tmly............^>24 2S<V Other Numbers: C rime Slopp|iers ...............................................4S2 74(> S C risib liiiervcniu)ii ............................................ 547 ^|(y| Siiiiiiie Preventi«m.......................................... J47*2222 PoiMin ( nniroL ............................................. .. ^7 M4I CliiU Prtiietiiitii ............................................. eJ^ uy s> ST. LOUIS PARK POLici: i)i:partment t AH'. NUMlil It i>Aii-;....... OH K lit i IMI O.AIKd: .'Xililii'ss: 5005 MiiiiKtoiika lllvd. St. i.ouis l*ark, MN 55416 Noii-enierKeiicy IMimie (612) 924-2600 l as (612) 924 2676 • CRIME VICTIM.RKJHTS A victim luis the right to: t. Request restitution (money) 1. Notincation of plea agreement y Appear at sentencing of the |XTsnn convicUHl of iIk * crime ami to olijecf to the pfo|Ntseil agreement i>r senleme verlially or in writing. If >*ou feel ytntr rights have lx ‘en violated, call the Crime Victims Otnbuilsmairs Office at 642-0397. I Ih ‘ iiuiro area has a variety ol crisis lu>t lim-s wlK*re an iiuiivithial may receive amfidential assis­ tance. I hese hot lim*s serve all people regardk*ss of race, sex, religion, age. sexual orientation, national iifigin, etc. 1 liey will also assist in linding s|X’ci(u agencH‘S which may Ixiter im*et ymir long term fWixIs. Smie t»f the crisis lines are: iViiite Vicitiii Center .......................... J40-540<^ I irat Call for Help................................ )55-500i^ Sexual Violence Center .................... 824 SS5S Yi:s/Ni:oN Mental Health Counseling .. 379-6 S61 Victims of violent criiiw may also lx ‘ eligible to receive nx»netary assistance, l oix* eligible li*r this fxiigrani tin* victim must: I. Repirt iIh * crime the |>oliie in the city where the iiime txcurred svithiii S ilays i>f the crime. If V »ahle to re|iort llu^ crime in that time, a re|x>rt r isi lx ‘ made within 5 da>s ol when ii re|X'rt could I i\e reasiMiahly lx*en made. C^io|N‘iate v\ ith |X)Uce. IV an inniHent victim. 4. l iV a Preliminary tdaim foiin with the (. rime Victims Ue|Xir.ifHMis Hoard within I \ear itl the iiime. I tt apply lor this assistance or lor more inlorrnation t:!! the Crifiu* Victims Reparations Board at: IK3MtS IIC VIOLUNC t II yon are flu* \ irtim <'l domr'ilir \ ii»l»*m •*. yott i in ask the City or Countv attorney ft» lile a critninal iornplaint. Ychi aht* ha\e the right to go to unirt and obtain an Onler h»r lYotection, aKo called a restraining order, against the |XTS4m(s) latoing the ahtiM*. An order li»r protection can 1. Kestrain the ahnwr Irtnn further avts t>l al>iise 1. Pireil the ahiiser to K a\e the h»'ine k Pn^iihil tiu' alm^er Irom entering \onr hoiiH . sclnxil. Inisincss or place ol employment. 4. Aw aril mui e»r the cither |\ireni cuMixlv \isitatioit ol any ihildrtai. S 1 ^iievt the ahuM i to pa\ sup)4trf tii M»n and the ihitdren il the abuser has a legaKhligatinn to <io so II \ou need any nuire inlorrnalum on getting an Order b>r Protection ot intormatuui on «in> itthei rights you ina\ ha\e. call 148-507 V ^)tlM*r assistance lor victims t»l diuiiestk abuse are: hiiicrgency Shelters in meiro areas" ............................... 227-4S95 Siijourner Shelter*............................ 9 5C7422 LB.C.A/s Black Ualteretl Women Program 871-7878 Division of Indian VViirk................ 827-7198 Casa de l*s|H*raiiia ............................ 224-1 177 Women of Natmns 292 9487 or 292-9 J58 CDIKC' Asian women’s program 627-4774 ’von in.u «.ill tbesi- nutnlu'fs iulleit Il Non are 1 be \ ic lim ol b.ua'>*^tnenl. coo mac oPaiii a liarassinenl Krstratmiig K hder. I liis wniiltl also includeteleplinne liarassrneut. bnr lurtber inlorma- lii.li tall H8-7959. MEDIATION SERVICES wiiAi IS mi:diation ? Meihation is an alternative disjMite resolution pnx ess wliere the parties involved in a dispute nuxi w itb a third |XTSon to discuss a fair solution to the dispite. Mediation is used as an alternative to a lourt pnxeetling. WHAT ISA MHDIATOR? A inecliati.r is a voliintec*r nr professional individual wbii assists tlie pirties in the dispute reach a fait solution I he mediafor d(M*s not take suVs and is iu.f c oncerned evifb “right ami wti>ng.* Their main goal is helping the pirtics reach agreement. Will N IS MEDIATION USEI ULf Mediation is useful if there is a di.s|xtle Ixicveeii: neigblx.rs. consumefS and businesses, landkirds and tt Hants, fannly nu mix rs, students, employers and employees, cilirens and agemii*s, residents and litc, oflenders and victims, friemls, etc. WHA I ARE THE BENEI f I S? I lk»ih iKirties agree to work together to reach agreifuenl. 2. Paster solution to dis|xite. k l^isuissiotis are confidential. 4 No blame is placed. WinAVin ratlu*r than NV’iii I I .sf. S Sax es inom^y^-serviie is usually free of charge, tv No court pnxeeding where everything IS |fiihlk 7 Vgreemenf is made by tlie |iarties iiixolveil, mil a jmlg.- I tir mole iiibirination on iiwdiation services in this area call: West Siitnirimn Mecitalfon Center 951 F IIM CITY or OiONO 01 OCNIIAL rUND (OPTION 02) DIVISION** BUDGET WORKSHEET -BY OBJECT DIV 21 HUMAN SERVICES AS OF 1*20-90 PAGE 11 OiiECT DEtCNlPTlON 1 19tl ACTUAL 1989ACTUAL 1990 APPROP Y-T-D 06-30-90 1990 ESTACTUAL 1991DEPT REQUEST 1991MGR RECOMMO 1991 COUNCIL ADOPTED Alls HUMAN SERVICE OROANIZATNS lOSOS 104S4 11260 4292 11260 I 13980 I I I >••• TOTAL OTHER CHARGES lOSOS 104S4 11260 4292 11260 I 13980 I I I TOTAL AMOUNTS THIS DIVISION 1050S 104S4 11260 4292 11260 I 13980 I I I H. Henn Human Service Planning Board 1440 1620 y- !■) it' ¥fe- I' 4J> • • k‘ % ff ft 01 OCNCiAL FUND - Senior Community Services .Hest.onka Senior Center LI.-0-N Area Senior Center W. Henn Pioneer Assn H. Suburban Mediation Center League of Mn Human Riglits 4600 4170 0 500 500 50 4B30 4200 2000 500 7 00 50 1 1.260 1 1 , ‘) B Os;s:isc£s — — I- -—= JL 1= DV 21 HUMAN SERVICES 1«90 CITY OF ORONO 01 GENERAL FUND (OPTION 021 DIV 31 POLICE DIVISION-- BUDGET WORKSHEET -BY OBJECT PROTECTION AS OF 1-20-90 PACE OBJECT DESCRIPTION 1944 ACTUAL 1949 ACTUAL 1990 APPROP V-T -D 06-30-90 1990 EST ACTUAL 1991 DEPI HEOItf ST 1991 MG« RECOMMO 1991 COllNCIl ADOPTED 4100 SALARIES-REQULAR EMPLOYEE 543475 585411 614160 225126 597460 I 626100 I 1 1 4111 OVERTIME-REGULAR f ^iiPLOYEE 31542 36020 21000 18163 31400 I 25000 1 I 1 4120 SAURIES-TEMP EMPLOYEES 8507 6245 5330 2596 5220 1 5370 I I I 4132 HOLIDAY PAY-LELS 16145 16656 19320 16410 I 17050 I 1 I 4134 INVALID OBJECT 2500 I 4000 I I I 4141 PERA-CITY CONTRIBUTION 64939 73763 75690 28807 73970 1 77280 I 1 I 4142 FICA/MDCR-CITV CONTRI8 4745 5213 6060 2005 5340 I 5660 1 I I 4151 HOSPITALIZATION INSURANCE 31961 34273 40000 18228 37610 I 42930 I I •• • 9 I 4152 LIFE INSURANCE 2742 3703 2740 1279 2760 I 2/60 1 I 1 4153 WORKMANS COMP INSURANCE 27397 28607 30930 32460 I 36090 1 1 I 4154 UNSIVLOYEMNT COMPENSATION 326 61 I 1 I 1 •••• TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 735939 749954 417720 296224 802630 I 442240 I i I 4210 OFFICE SUPPLIES 7692 7614 6500 4125 6500 I 7000 I I I 4220 MOTOR FUELS A LUBRICANTS 22990 24563 24000 9527 24000 I 28000 I I I 4221 CLOTHING « PERSONAL EQUIP 6828 9835 9000 801 1 9000 1 10000 I I I 4231 BLDG A GROUNDS MAR SUPPLY 136 442 400 106 200 1 400 I I I 4232 EQUIPMENT PARTS A ACCES 4549 7322 4500 1d43 4500 1 5000 1 I I 4240 BOMS A PERIODICALS 1243 1769 1200 323 1200 1 1200 I 1 I 4241 TRAINING SUPPLIES 2440 534 3400 2 70 2400 1 3800 1 I I 4243 DARE PROGRAM 591 600 I 600 I I I 4244 K-R 000 PROGRAM 1874 3600 I 2000 I i I TOTAL SUPPLIES-MAIN-REPAI 49954 52083 53400 26374 56000 1 58000 I I I 4303 LEGAL-CONSULTING SERVICES 684 857 1500 685 1000 I 1500 I I I 4304 OTHER CONSULTING SERVICES 3098 6723 7000 4449 6000 1 7000 I I I •••• TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 3742 7583 4500 5134 7000 1 8500 I I I b. 01 GENERAL FUND OV 31 POLICE PROTECTION r 2491.2 TO: FROM: DATS: Mayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrat February 4, 1991 SUBJECT: Canine Program Attachment: A. Canine Program Memo Dated 1/31/91 ISSUE - Update Council regarding status of the canine program. INTRODUCTION - As noted in Attachment A despite the smoothness of tHe program in all other respects, the initiation of drug training revealed Baron apparently did not have the "personality" for drug training. (Once they are deemed not suitable, they cannot go back for training.) As a result the City does have a choice of either retaining Baron or as noted investing between 5 to 10 days depending on the adaptability of a new dog in the hopes that a new dog may be ameanable to the drug training. The only costs entailed to the City would be "time" spent by Officer Flschenich becoming familiar with a new dog. As far as hard dollars are concerned there should not be an additional cost. While there would be no guarantee that a new dog would be ameanable to drug training it would obviously give another possibility of getting another dog that could be drug trained. If a new dog was brought on board Baron would be "retired" and placed in a suitable home. (Either the original owner or sold to a security firm.) RECOMMENDATION - This is presented to Council for information only at this time. Unless Council has objections, staff will go ahead with a new dog with Officer Fischenich training him in the June timeframe. (It should be noted that Dan spent only 5 days out of the two week program with Baron in drug training.) PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by the Council act. information and direction that staff has taken regarding tr.e canine program. Ayes __, Nays __. cc: Chief Kilbo Officer Flschenich K**’ v>^ I - A < Data: 9*iluarv 31« 1991 Tot Marl B»rnhard*cn , Citv Aanunistr ator rroflit Mai KiJdo. Chi at ot Police Rai 0-f-ficer Dan Fischenxcn ?< Canine Proaram During tha canina drug training program held recently, it Mae datarminad Baron was not amanable to drug training, and this training was thara+ore tarminateo aarlv on January 22, 1991, Minnaaoolis Canits die indicate they will train another dco •for this DaoartAHnt, commencina on March iSth, tor 13 waat;3. At tha and o-f th; s 13 waak trainina, Qi^icor Ficchenich will train with the dog for a period ot S-lO days to oacoma acquaintad with each otnar to be a "team". This time period bagina June 17, 199i. Tha trainina takas place Monday through Friday. Thera will be no charge to this Department for this training, except for the time apanr pv Jtficer Fischanich at this school. No cover shifts wi.i be needed to cover his shift. Tha nekt drug course is not scheduled until earl'^ iv92> I have learned it is not unusual for a dog to "wash out" in bacoailng a police canine. Mound Police Department is now on their third dog« and there were at least five officers from Dan's class that have had to change Jogs. Officer Fischanich is very interested in continuing the canine program, with Baron or other dog, and he has full Department support. I do recommend we continue this program and take advantagi of the offer of a new canine. i ^ 1 r;*! • TOs FBOM: DATS: Mayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrat February 4, 1991 % SUBJECT: Canine Program Attachment: A. Canine Program Memo Dated 1/31/91 ISSUE - Update Council regarding status of the canine program INTRODUCTION - As noted in Attachment A despite the smoothness of the program in all other respects, the initiation of drug training revealed Baron apparently did not have the "personality ” for drug training. (Once they are deemed not suitable, they cannot go back for training.) As a result the City does have a choice of either retaining Baron or as noted investing between 5 to 10 days depending on the adaptability of a new dog in the hopes that a new dog may be ameanable to the drug training. The only costs entailed to the City would be "time" spent by Officer Fischenich becoming familiar with a new dog< As far as hard dollars are concerned there should not be an additional cost. While there would be no guarantee that a new dog would be ameanable to drug training it would obviously give another possibility of getting another dog that could be drug trained. If a new dog was brought on board Baron would be "retired" and placed in a suitable home. (Either the original owner or sold to a security firm.) RECOMMENDATION - This is presented to Council for information only Hit this time. Unless Council has objections, staff will go ahead with a new dog with Officer Fischenich training him in the June timeframe. (It should be noted that Dan spent only 5 days out of the two week program with Baron in drug training.) PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by the Council accept information and direction that staff has taken regarding the canine program. Ayes __, Nays __. cc:Chief Kilbo Officer Fischenich I' % Tot Fromt Date: Subject: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director Jack Brinkhaus, Public Works Supervisor January 30, 1991 Bid Award - Equipment & Materials Bids 1991 ^0 Vo The City of Orono advertised for two successive weeks for street materials and equipment rental, with bid opening at 10:00 A.M. Friday, January 25, 1991. The enclosed tabulation contains a complete accounting of all bids received and the recommended low bidders and alternates. The accepted low bids for materials are determined by availability and location of materials. Traveling distance to a supplier is considered a cost factor when determining a low bid. When renting equipment with an operator, we are guided by the type, size of equipment, and an hourly rate. It is possible to award the low bid to more than one contractor when considering materials and equipment. In order to stimulate enthusiasm for the following years work, we make sure to divide the work accordingly among these low bidders. In the event the low bidder is not available, the City reserves the right to purchase from the next alternate. I recommend that the City Council accept the bids as presented for the calendar year 1991. TO:Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Forwarded recommending approval. r l I vv February 12, 1991 TO* ALL PARTICIPATING BIDDERS RE: 1991 STREET MATERIALS — EQUIPMENT RENTAL BIDS The City of Orono Public Works Department advertised for street fliaterials and equipment rental bids for the year 1991. At 10:00 A.M. on Friday, %7anuary 25, 1991, all bids were publicly opened and read at the City Council Chambers. The enclosed tabulation contains a complete accounting of all bids received and the recommended low bid or bidders and alternates. The accepted low bidders for materials are determined by availability and location of materials. It is in the best Interest of the City to consider mileage as a cost factor when low bidders are determined. In the event the successful low bidder is unable to perform, the City reserves the right to order from the alternate. When renting equipment with operator, the City is guided by the particular type and size of equipment, coupled with the hourly rate. For this reason, it is possible to award the low bid to three different contractors that own various sizes of the same type of equipment. In the event the low bidder's equipment is not available when needed, the City reserves the right to rent from the next alternate. The City of Orono approved and awarded the tabulation of bids as presented . We wish to thank all contractors for participating in bidding material and equipment for the 1991 season. Sincerely JB/tln Enclosure Jack Brinkhaus, Public Works Supervisor y •' tp'mht i r CITY OP ORONO 1991 BID TABOIATIOHS FOR STRBBT MRTBRIRLS k BQOIPNBIIT RBNTAI. AIX QDAIITITIB8 ARB BID IN TOMS—BQOIPMBNT IS DID PER HOURLY RATB CLASS 5 GRAVEL TON FA-2 CLASS C (SEAL COAT) TON FA-1 (WINTER SAND) TON PIT DEL.PIT DEL.PIT DEL. Sa-Ag Inc.2.25 * 4.92 * 1.10 * 4.05 (1) Wn Moeller t Sons 2.25 * 5.85 (4) 4.25 * 7.85 * 1.75 (1) 5.35 (3) Barton Sand ( Gravel Co.3.15 (2) 4.92 * 7.00 (1) 9.50 (2) 2.50 (2) 3.90 * Midwest Asphalt Corp.3.00** (1) 5.15** (1) MBS Inc.5.50 (3) 9.15*** (3) 4.85*** (2) Bury Carlson 3.40 (3) 5.24 (2) ii 1^ .V I:" f|K- * DEMOTES LOW BID ** R«crush«d concrete t bituminous mixture *** Modified to Barton specs 1-S ALTERNATES Jm:'.. ■ . ■ . . . +• 1/ CITY OF OROHO1991 BID TBBOIATIOHS FOR STREET MATERIALS S EQOIPNEMT RENTAL ALL gOANTITIES ARB BID IE TOMS—BQOIPNBIIT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE 1 1/2" CLEAN CRUSHED LIMESTONE TON 1 1/2" MINUS CRUSHED LIMESTONE TON 3/4" CLEAN CRUSHED LIMESTONE TON 3/4" MINUS CRUSHED LIMESTONE TON PIT DEL.PIT DEL.PIT DEL.PIT DEL Bryan Rock Products 4.00 * 7.00 * 3.90 * 6.90 * 5.30 * 8.30 * 3.75 * 6.75 * MBS Inc.***7.23 (U 7.13 (1) 8.43 (1 ) 7.18 (1 ) 4 r_ I • ¥if' 'W' tisi-' ■*. ’ • * 1 DEMOTES LON BID ALTERNATE MC 30, 70, 250, 800 GALLON PLANT DEL.6 PLACED CRS - 1 i 2 GALLON PLANT DEL.fiPLACED RC 250-800 GALLON PLANT DEL.6PLACBD it,''*." m- ff'- I-', f* ^ Mm llu«ll«r s Sons 1.75 * * DENOTES LOW BID *V‘‘ CITY OP OROaO1991 BID TBBOIATIONS POB 8TRBBT MBTBRIALS ft BQOIPNBIIT RENTAL ALL QDANTITIB8 ARB BID IN TONS—BOOIPMEHT IS BID PER HOORLY RATE 2331 AC TON 2331 MC TON PLANT DELIVERED PLACED PIANT DELIVERED PIACED ** CoMMrcial Asphalt 21.30 (1) Mb Nuellar t Sons 18.50 * 22.10 * 26.10 * 25.50 (1) 29.10 * 34.10 • Nidwest Asphalt 21.30 (1) 25.25 (1) 27.35 (1) 25.30 * 29.25 (1) 35.30 (1) I 0 *v-' I; '• * DENOTES LOW BID ** .80 Discount if paid within 10 1-2 ALTERNATES days .K > • S'- pB-:1^^ I J CITY OP OflONO 1991 BID TABUIATIOMS FOR STREET MATERIALS t EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QOANTITIBS ARB BID IN TONS—EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE PLANT 2341 AC TON DEL.PLACED PLANT 2341 MC TON DEL.PLACED Wn Mueller ( Sons 18.50 * 22.10 * 26.10 * 25.50 (1) 29.10 * 34.10 * Midwest Asphalt Corp.21.70 (2) 25.65 (1) 27.75 (1 ) 25.15 * 29.10 * 35.15 (1 ) ** Comnercial Asphalt 21.30 (1) * DENOTES LOW BID •* 80 Discount if paid within 10 days 1-2 ALTERNATES • : i', jv-;f- r ih- Ir'f: h:.' % §•!'.'■• 4':’ ■ h; f- rI t-* CITY OF OROIIO 1991 BID TABUIATIONS FOR STRBBT HATBRIALS ft EQOIPMBNT RBNTAL ALL QOABTITIBS ARB BID IN TONS—BQOIFMBNT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE MOD. PINE MIX 2341 AC TON MOD. PINE MIX 2341 MC TON 2341 AC/MC 50/50 TON PLANT DEL.PLACED PLANT DEL.PLACED PLANT DEL.PLACED Vm Muoller ft Sons 19.50 * 23.10 * 27.10 * 26.50 (1) 30.10 (1) 35.10 * Midwost Asphalt Corp.22.00 (1) 25.95 (ly 28.35 (1) 25.90 * 29.85 * 35.DOn)25.90 * 29.85 * 35.90 * ** Coomercial Asphalt 22.30 (2) * DENOTES LOW BID ** .80 Discount if 1-2 ALTERNATES paid within 10 days 4 CITY OP OROHO 1991 BID TABDIATIOHS FOR STREET NATEKi ALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL Q0ANTITIB8 ARB BID IN TONS—BQOIPMKN' rS BID PER HOURLY RATE 12*CMP 15"CMP 18"CMP 24"CMP 24"CMP 36"CMP 40"CMP 60"CMP 16 GAUGE 16 GAUGE 16 GAUGE 14 GAUGE 16 GAUGE 14 GAUGE 12 GAUGE 10 GAUGE ALL PRICES TO H.V. Johnston BE DELIVERED 8.83 <1) 10.38 (1) 12.08 (1) 19.01 (1) 15.59 (1 ) 29.28 (1) 49.59 (1) 84.32 (1) Contech 5.25 * 6.20 * 7.45 * 11.00 * 9.20 17.10 * 32.35 * 57.30 * 12" APRON 15" APRON 18" APRON 24" APRON 36" APRON 48" APRON 60" APRON ALL PRICES TO H.V. Johnston BE DELIVERED 32.80 * 41.61 * 54.08 * 80.43 * 237.10 * 573.08 (1) 1,010.25 (1) Contech 34.25 (1) 43.25 (1) 54.25 (1) 84.50 (1) 249.50 (1) 549.50 * 979.50 * 12" BAND 15" BAND 18" BAND 24" BAND 36" BAND 48" BAND 60" BAND ALL PRICES TO BE DELIVERED H.V. Johnston 8.83 10.30 12.00 15.59 29.28 74.39 126.48 (1) (1)(1 )(1 )(1)(1)<1) Contech 5.25 6.20 7.45 11.00 17.10 48.50 85.95 ******* * DENOTES LOW BID 1 ALTERNATE • • < CITY OP OROHO 1991 BID TBBOIATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS i EQUIP ALL QOAMTITIES ARE BID IN TONS—BOOTPNENT IS BID PER T RENTAL HOORLY RATE TRUCK PER HOUR CY RATE TRUCK PER HOUR CY RATE TRUCK PER HOUR CY RATE TRUCK PER HOUR CY RATE Bury A Carlson, Inc. 11 42.00 * Schoanlng Excavating 12 36.00 * Volkanant & Sons inc.15 44.00 * MBB Inc.42.00 * TRUCK PE-. HOUR CY RATE TRUCK PER HOUR CY RATE TRUCK PER HOUR CY RATE TRUCK PER HOUR CY RATE H'.' Volkcnant fi Sons Inc. 18 54.00 * tT' MBE Incs 22 52.00 * 54 s 00 * * DENOTES LOW BID CITY OF OKOHO1991 BID TBBUIATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS t EQOIPNEIIT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS—EQaiPMBNT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE i ^ACKHOE ^ HOUR RATE BACKHOE PER HOUR CY RATE BACKHOE PER HOUR CY RATE Schoening Excavating 1/2 48.00 * 3/4 60.00 * Volkanant 6 Sons 1/3 50.00 « 3/4 75.00 (1) 3/4 TON PICKUP W/8 PLOW PER HOUR Schoening Excavating 34.00 * WHEEL LOADER PER HOUR CY RATE WHEEL LOADER PER HOUR CY RATE WHEEL LOADER PER HOUR CY RATE Bury ft Carlson« Inc.2 75.00 (1) Schoening Excavating 2 50.00 * Volkenant 6 Sons 2 3/4 64.00 * I I, I MBE 4 1/2 70.00 * * DENOTES LOM BID 1 ALTERNATES 8 < Oyy J ^TO* FROM: DATS: Mayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrat<^ January S, 1991 SUBJECT: Administrator’s Information CIGARETTE LICENSING - At the Council's last meeting CounciImember Goetten inquired as to the possibility of restricting over the counter sales of cigarettes. Dorothy Hallin has researched that information and found out the following: According to the League of Minnesota Cities research department it probably would not be legal to totally restrict the sale of cigarettes. Although the State collects tax on cigarettes the statute states the purpose of municipal licensing is to control the sale and cse of tobacco. There is no statute that gives the municipality the option of sale or no sale similar to the sale of liquor. Attachment A lists cities which have adopted a total bam and/or partial ban on cigarette vending machines sales. This list also shows the total population and percentage of state population affected by these restrictive ordinances. WELL t3 (HIGHWAY 12) - The well house has been completed except for shingling the mansord roof. The pumps and pressure tanks are Installed and waiting receipt and installation of the control panels for the facility. It is anticipated at this point that this well will be on line approximateiv 1 April 1991. POLICY BODY MATERIALS PREPARATION - In response to Council request staff is reviewing its process of preparing materials for both Council and Planning Commission to feasibility of earlier deliveries of them balanced off against current deadlines for applications. The results will be presented at Council's next meeting. NAVARRE HEIGHTS - As previously noted to Council, the item has been delayed at the "applicants" request until March 25, 1991. Attachment C represents a copy of the notice that was transmitted to residents in the area on Friday, February 1, 1991. DECEMBER RECEIPTS AND DISBDRSEMENTS - Will be presented at 2/is/9l meeting. WIRE TRANSFERS - Will be presented at 2/25/91 meeting. ADMINISTRATOR'S GOAL SETTING - See attachment. i h' ft 14- tf 'ft ft .r* i' ^;>>^ ' " , . t'1^ MN Community Ordinances to Restrict ^ Cigarette Vending Machines liw Bans on Cigarette Vending Machine Sales - ADOPTED Ibtal population covered by these ordinances : 501 ^ 1 12% of State Population ^jTf^QHM€XIT A 1. Bloooingion 2. Brooklyn Center 3. Brooklyn Park 4. Chanhassen 5. Cokaio 6. Coon Rapids 7. Edina 8. Golden Valley 9. Kenyon 10. Milaca 11. Minnetonka 12. Mora 13. Nonhiield 14. Orono 15. Owatonna 16. Richfield 17. Sl Qoud 18. St. Louis Park 19. Waconia 20. White Bear Lake Partial Restrictions on Cigarette Vending Machine Sales - ADOPTED Total population covered by these ordinances : 926,614 22% of State Population 1. Anoka 2. Austin 3. Big Lake 4. Blaine 5. Cannon Falls 6. Chanmlin 7. Deer River 8. Delano 9. Duluth 10. Excelsior 11. *!utchinson 12. Jackson 13. Kasson 14. Minneapolis 15. New Brighton 16. Preston 17. Red Wing 18. Redwood Falls 19. Shoreview 20. Sl Paul 21. West Sc. Paul 22. Worthington an rnmmaxhrii. fepTcsenring 1.4 million tesideng and af lb£ pgpulaiifllL already have taken action »lessict dgarene vending machines. Above ii bMOd OB ■ plwne fwvty of .Minttciou oonvnuniiits 22.000 popuUoon oon:oleted btiwttn Mach b ■d April S. 1990 by da Univmiiy of MioMcou School of Public Hoalih. (7.1040) m r V ' '••r •mm-mm-mm- 1W7 Gbjcctli 0^)«cUi W1 Draft 05/30/10 Itoviaed Oi/29/IO 07/31/10 09/07/10 09/20/90 10/30/90 11/30/90 12/3V90 01/31/91 GOAL AREA OBJECTIVE DATES STATLS !• OnSKXT? OMLOP?^ A. Highway 12 1, utilitle* Sewer - Part I Install 09/01/09 Ooi^leted 1/30/90 except for testing/grading 7/9/90 Q^gagad asperate contractor to oofiplete Assessed Part I 9/24/90 Sewer - Part II viater Systen Main Install Install 07/01/'90 1/22/90 ’’easibility Study to Orono Plant Ordered - 4/1/90 - reasibility study received 09/01/89 Project Ordered 7/24/B9 COfSMnoed Constructicri 10/27/89 & U/U/89 OoR^leted 12/15/89 (See Sewer ?t I) Assessed Part I 9/24/90 well (6 oonths) ?!ain Well 04/01/90 12/30/90 Cleaning and T\Mt PuRping 8/10/90 Bldg/Pujp Bids Close 7/13/90 Revised Contract 9A0/90 Additional work cxi well oo^pleted 10/90 Pifl|> house construction/l/9I exterior oonpletion. All but piap controls Installed. Ibwer (9-12 oonths) Plans Specs - Order Award 07/01/90 2/12 Authorised Plans/Specs Awaiting locitiai decision Negotiation cn Utilities (Ung take - Medina) CDs—iiced water discussion 10/25/89 with Msdina - Medina to rieet with affected residents 1/90 to discuss MU GCAL CeJECTTvT DATES STATJS 1. OOmJNXT^ DEVELOP?>£^^‘ Cortinued •88 STD 2. Lcng Term Corridor upgrade feasibility Study•88 STO •90 510 ryiDOT initiation or 09/01/09 07/07/89 Undertake corridor selection 02/90 6/30/99-Awaiting ftespcnae from MOot Central Office on Oansultant Delayed until at least U/30/89 Governor's Traneporatlon Safety Mtg 10/26/89 U/15/89 Qceiiisaicmr Levine annomces consultant/^ynxrr corridor selection study Howard Needles selected as oonsultant yay & Jira nestings delayed bo July July mtgs cesisultant iM^ouit initial work plat. Ooqpletion of study targeted for 7/91, Orono objectives sttaitted 9/20/90 workshop held 12/1/90 Second workshop 1/23/91 Directed Plming Oenm review reoc^'endation of issues to date. 5/14/90 Discussed engageswit of possible oansultant to study. 6/25/90 Authorized request for service 9/10/90 Directed use of Dahlgren Shardlow 6 Ltei 5/15/90 Anticipate signal warrant analysis to be oo^pleted by 5/30. Ooincil authorixid 6/25 in hesolution. Indication is that it will meet warrants by 1992 date. 6/25/90 Adopt approval resoluticn fbr safety iappovesant contingent on thtir Installation Anticipate bid award 1992. Actual ooistructioi 1993 in order to install lights in oonjunction with project. PMK QQ^L AICA !• CQWCMm OMLOPtmt Continufid *aa STo •89 STD B. Navarre Redevelopmsit gbjecttvt : Determine project saope/ direction 3A*33 38/'01.'89 STATJ^ •90 STD Determine beaut if icaticn plan 12/90 ifl^IeiDentaticn if nay Coeplete vaster ?Iaming, if 07/91 appropriate Determine need for Tax Increnent Diftrict Determine interest in Chriscnas 09/90 lighting 3/12/90 Tabled for additional information 4/7/90 Discussed possible inclusion in a Icng term Gcmp Plan 9/2?'90 ’resent Information relative to issue C* Ooneiunity Transportation Update capital project Plan guidelines Bridge bending program 07/90 07/90 Old Cr^'stal Bay fkjad bridge submitted for staff review 10/90. Submitted to State 10/90 r>- *90 STD Public/Privabt street - review policy 09/90 10/22/90 Cbuncll authorizes City takeover of Lafayette Ridge. 1/28/91 Oxmcil converts wear lj\ to public street. •90 STD 0. County Road 116 Undertake ca^ budget designated projects Preliminary plan review ?ksiitor action by County as to its proposed construction 12/4/90 :Mina approved final plans/grants its existing easements. 1/3/91 rudina Council reslnds acticxi. 1/27/91 County deletes U6 from plan. •87 STD •88 STD •89 STD E. Storm Hater ^iana9eamnt Plsi Ascertain available mappiir! Develop RTP for study if appropriate Included in Revla# of Storm water 'igt Options littiiWk. mm- c- i '*1 ■L I rw. IKP' ll. T-r- ;>’■ w1^-'It;'; hfr- V. • '. i: I* iv^ -* -.1 > . AFBA GOAL AREA 1. canxrm VMUP^Ttn continued •90 STO G« OonBunity oevelopAint Direction and Progress 2. ElAn»t®irAL PHOTOCriGN •90 A. Stubbs Bay gbjectt ;e DATES A.) Lake Use - I/tE (iprehensive plan 01/91 - Develop City specific objectives 08/90 B.) work towards service and results oriented "No Surprises" process C.) Coap Plan Response to .^)etro Qouncil - Sewer - Transportation 10/90 D.) D?® Shoreland Regulation 07/91 OeteriBine assessaent area interest 07/90 Engage an appraiser 08/90 Consider developaent raoratoriun 10/90 If Appropriate - Pre^e ?im 4 Specifications • Project bid - Assess project Hold Hearing if appropriate - Order project - Bond for project - ooMtnae project - Oo^>lete project 4 10/90 12/90 01/91 02/91 03/91 04/91 10/91 STATUS 6/28 and 7/12 discussed City oo^wnts Of piijlic review draft with UID’s Advisory OoBButtee ^ .. 8/24/90 Recel'^ revised draft. Tb disoiss 9/10/90. 9/26/90 IU4C3D Board to vote on plan 9/26/^ r/t35 adoots a portion tables balance to 10/24/90 ______ 10/24/90 L?CD adopts plan with aesndnents 12/10/90 council adopts same resolution as 7 other cities. l/lS/91 Metro Council staff recowjends 6 no. suspension. 1/22/91 :ietro Council Systems Coaeittee gives ■Contingent Approval". 1/23/91 I2Q grants 3 wo. hold. 1/90 Vetro Council grants extension 2/15 4 23/90 staff reviews Issues 9/24/90 Minimal changes to Planning Oomission U/26/90 Ocxiprehensive Plan #3 directed for siteission. 12/90 Developed work plan/started initial 1/91 Staff develops Initial Draft to include t^date of aoodplain regs. 7/31/90 letters sent to area OMiers 9/24/90 Response limited. 1b use interested neighbors to assist. 1/22/91 Additional information transmitted to Ad Hoc group. ■ Am . . . ^ 4._____ ' iV’ •■* ' ' ' ■ ■■' •<., _••■?’■ . r-.T ' w «0-fiU-: i:^5i?: k;?j< tel...K.1*' . ill fev>:' i#0i.,MiU 'ISf* 'm‘mm Wt ■ 0m *s? Am C»L AREA cBj^crr/E Expect 3/31/90 oc3n?)leticfi DATES STATE’S 2. EWmOMUDVL PtCIECTHON Oantinuad *89 STO B« Solid fteste rtanagenent Review recycling efforts 06/90 *P?5 ■ 3/26/90 Compost pUn adopted a/90 proposed chipper in 1991 bix^et Deterniine If further solid waste regulation appropriate 12/90 Review organized oollectian if needed 09/90 10/90 Staff determines not needed for 1991. Review program performance Rebid contract for curbside 10/90 10/90 10/90 Contract reviewed in process thru west Hennepin Recycling 12/14/90 deceived bids for 1991. 1/14/91 ccntract awarded to Polka Dot. Review incentives to iJiprove participation 02/91 C. Metro Meste Rtplacenwit Project Goepletion 10/01/89 Delayed to at least lZ/31/89 Expect 1/31/90 ccopletlon Uft SUtion lOAift Station 43 Rsplaoenent Gospletian 07/90 Bid warded 6/10 for work ocmpletion - Gooesnoad work 7/10 after Bond oos^^y release. Ooi^pleted 10/1/90 r.K-' ^:- P;'-m ? r>. eK I- ix- im;. fc : «r AFEK QQM. MBA OBJECTIVE DAIES STMTS a. QRBMttZMS3NM. DBVOCVMlir *90 BID A. 1991 Oowicil Goal Setting Comence Ooi^lete 07/90 09/90 6/25/90 - Suggestioi to ComkH for *91 U/9/90 Council dicacts tabling to 1991. 12/21/90 1t»»aBitted Strategic Icaue DevelopMnt 1/91 Olscuaaing with Qxmcil B. 1991 Budget Piooess Assesnent Board of Review Preliminary Budget guidelines Capital projects guidelines review 05/90 07/90 08/90 Oonpletad 5/3/90 Presented Initial Guidellnea 7/31/90 Initial revised plan 1990-2000 Preliminary mill levy adoption (Truth in Tasatioi) Hearing 09/01/90 Adopted initial levy 8/27/90 12/90 12/3/90 Held hearing/oontinuad hearing to 12/19/90 12/18/90 Adopted Budget/Uvy Reeolutian final levy adoption 90 STD C. 1991 Lagialative Plan 0. Team Building Staff Council 12/20/90 12/18/90 Adopted 09/-11/90 12/90 r'ftiUhrtiiit r a ■ > ; ■■ tiii' hXK C3QAL AREA OBJECTIVE DATES 4. SERinCB OO.IVERY *90 STO A. racilitiM upgrade Gonplete Citizen Iteview Conmttee 07/90 If undertaken Site acquisition, if any •87 STOmm •90 m B. Long Rsige rinancial Bolicy Select architect Design Final plana/oosts Plana/speci float ions Financing Bid awards Develop balance of policy 09/90 C. Business Strategy Plans Police - Update Golf Course -09/01/90 STATUS 6/29/89 Bus tour Of facilities •testing set foe 11/8/89 11/8/89 ritg directed Jeveloptent of tiioe guidelines to Oomcil 11/27/89 project estlMtes/financing to Ocancll 12/11/89 1/28/91 Discussed IssuesAJpooiiing torkshop tabled to 2/11 8/22/90 council/TaciUti^ Coieiittee intg. 9/24/90 Elstablished 10/22 for site discussion 10/22/90 Site discussion. Council directs workshop on all infonsation be held. 9/90 rive year financial projection ooepleted in oonjunctidi with facility review for 10/22/90. AREA GOAL AFEA CfiJTCTT.'E ?A1TS STA1V5 4. SBSma DELXVBOr CGntlAued 0. Service Revieii#s 90 STO Elvjineering services Gcnplete 08 '90 90 STO Legal services ooeplete 09 '90 5.\H mams Iirplefwnt E^nployee Recognition rormilate City enployee cSevelopment Explore performance incentive program Explore "Cafeteria Benefits"/ IBS Section 125 Plan 01/90 06/90 07/)0 07/^90 LYdertake LOOC ocxiteat first/closa 4/6/90 U/90 Oomnittee selects winning design. 1/8/90 Presented ocxiceptual discuasiai to Council 9/27/90 Presented information to Oowil. Tabled to 9/10 9/10/90 AMsrd to Safe Beneflu to develop for 1/1/91 U/13/90 Adopted plan 11/29/90 Q^loyee introductory meetings held with 12/3-4/90 sign-qp maeti^. 12/90 in place far 1991. V14/91 A^ted Personnel Rules alteration in vacation areas 1/28/91 Adopted i^dated policy ^ .k *.J LIST OF LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR HErrmC of February 11. 1991 Septic System Installer - Jerry Johnson Exc. 2445 Morningside Roac IITY « Cryvui Bay. B4inn«ac« 55323 Trx SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERS LICENSE APPLICATION BUILDINC 5 ZONLNG - •*73-'357 assessing .■A, <5 Sf^insulanca? anre'/idenirorMPCA‘c«r!fI«iion or Hone Sewage ■ n!“-:;;Lfe!cnrL4niSi:ii%=i%er=ir^ 1. 2, 3. Susiness or trace name /gf ~^ •y i Business address .2 ^^.5" Business phone _ Residence phone • a k -« /•* / ^ ^ 4. Name certi of applicant or campanv jcepresentative holding MPCA ification ---------------------------- l/ 5.y Installer Pumcer Certificate No. 6. 7. 8. 10 Type of certification nead; ^ Site evaluatcr _ _System cesicner Is this a Provisional Certmcate? - - oL^of'^thein-fite iewlg^ T?eelifnt*«cr-«h:^ prior to the current construction season- Have you ever held a Septic System Ins^lier license in Orono before? Most recent year /fT;l Have you ever had a license revoked? When? - - .. Where? _ _ _ NoDo you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yes Do you pump out septic tanks? Yss No SUBMITTALS REQUIRED:ua f r ui- wiwW r - ^ u ^ A iE •. 1 • — ■ i.. IAwa « «•* V V wvail. 1. $25.00 license application fee. _ -- -- - _ 2. $2000.00 license and permit bond naming City or Orona^eci obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accef^ted.n : 3. $10-30-100,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance. 'Sfc 4. Copy of current MPCA Certificate or evidence of at On-Site Sewage Treatment Workshop held immediately 02/OZP prior to current construction season. LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED. List persons other than applicant who ^e authorized by you to apply for permits under your license - - - - - - - - - - - - The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of Orono, Minnesota, for license to install and repair septic systems, and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws, of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinancesthe C^y of Orono. 7/ Applicants Signature Staff reeommendatiorC Approval^;^^- Reason for denial: _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ City Council Action Date _______ Date license mailed _ Approved Denied ■32/03/91 PR 3 PRREGOR d*. EMP » NAME YTO GROSS CURRENT GROSS 471638060 53666:439 4^4S63:39 47:i40371 47: 443862 4725029- 4■)5:502c ;S8:2iui8 472529007 i6 V "*01868 507^85424 46<<d86562 458420832 474667812 475380151 477500666 475444249 471569863 4-7647279 475246099 504260307 472500574 121262417 470667594 334506281 474822333 477028779 468909535 476783251 470700901 469848107 475382983 473746173 476447153 469629194 475569177 472583051 474663296 470704904 47SS0S292 468629418 307809189 5C0403192 477881539 ANDERSON BRUCE L 31 8ERNHAROSON. MARK E 12 BCSZIEN. SUE A 31 BGSMA. JAMIE L 12 S=, INKHAUS. JOHN F 42 :hESWICK. GARY B 31:hristianson sal;.y 31 CORNICK JAMES L 31 ENGLISH III. IRVING 31 ERICKSON. KURT R 31 FISCHENICH DAN T 31 FRIT2LER. JOHN M 31 GAFFRON. MICHAEL P 33 QERHAROSON. JOHN R 42 GREGORY. JAMES D 42 HALLIN DOROTHY M 12 HANSEN STEVEN C 42 HANSINQ. CAROL J 31 JOHNSON. BRADLEY P 31 KARNITZ. RICKY D 31 KILBO. MELVIN H 31 KNUTSON, charlotte A 15 KUEHN THOMAS M 15 MABUSTH. JEANNE A 33 MORAN. MARK F 31 MOROWC2YNSKI JAMES 31 NAAB. THERESA L 12 NELSON. DAVID 0 35 OBERAIGNER SCOTT Q 42 OBRIEN RANDY L 92 OMAN LYLE E 33 PALMER. GREGORY A 42 OUAST WAYNE ^ 92 RATHBUN. BAr 92 ROBERTS. TIM. Hi W 31 SKREEN dale S 42 STEFFCNHAGEN. RONALD 93 THOMTON. MARK 9 31 TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE F 31 TOMCZYK. HARK W 31 VANG. BRUCE L 33 VEE. LINDA S 12 WALSH KCVIN L 35 WALTERS. LINDA G 15 WECKMAN. STEPHEN J 33 4451.41 7014 08 2854 03 763 4533 4800 514 75 4740 90 4908 4262 4773 4382 4144 5450 3705 3570 23 3332 96 1692 4552 1266 6081 2854 5792 5362 4612 80 4634 78 2854 218 2944 12 3580 92 4378 2879 4157 3416 3124 29 3404 39 3575 06 4481 4231 4239 3391 2426 648 2782 2155 69 50 00 42 41 85 40 60 19 53 37 91 46 75 06 18 36 05 07 T5 «1 07 30 83 39 52 61 07 24 55 17 92 36 72 13 1508 2221 958 611 1522.89 1600 00 200 27 1563 1619 1408 1366 1460 1392 1.30 1139 1199 1038 572 1434 654 2042 958 1945 1743 1537 1406 958 90 1041 1148 1392 870 1318 1109 1169 1025 1200 96 1381 68 1381 68 1422 56 1139 28 814.96 212.47 972 49 945 12 03 15 48 59 80 23 71 38 23 40 51 89 74 97 72 69 51 60 48 72 17 40 16 23 07 48 99 41 80 54.538.08 469188026 CALLAHAN. EDWARD J 11 483 34 241 67 18324677 QOETTEN. J DIANN 11 483 34 241 67 473646272 JABBOUR. GABRIEL 11 483 34 241.67 469605135 PETERSON. BARBARA A 11 600.00 300.00 1.025 Cl ■ ■ • S :• ■ h-,,r J-f--'. im CITY or (MONO CHCCK NO. DATE 042006 042006 042006 042006 042006 042006 042006 042006 042006 042010 042014 042014 042014 042014 042020 042020 042020 04.:020 042020 042020 042027 042027 042027 043027 042030 042030 042030 042030 042030 049030 0 . 10 nJll 0-’ i&iiiiliili 02/06/61 02/06/91 02/06/61 02/06/61 02/06/81 02/06/91 02/06/91 02/06/91 02/06/91 02/06/91 02/06/91 02/06/91 02/06/91 02/06/91 02/06/91 02/06/91 02/06/81 02/06/91 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 112 140 67 67 67 66 67 67- 67 67 12 13 MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST BSNS 6SNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS PROD PROD PROD PROD PROD PROD PROD PROD PROD OFFICE OFFICE OFF ICE OFFICE OFFICE OFF ICE OFFICE OFFICE STAND SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 16.6c 16 66 ATAT INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 51 52 145 170 420 93 23 10 96 12 ALL STAR ELECTRIC ALL STAR ELECTRIC ALL STAR ELECTRIC ALL STAR ELECTRIC REPAIR REPAIR REPAIR REPAIR 500 161 1,037 107 1.812 00 00 00 00 00 APPLE VALLEY AGENCY APPLE VALLEY AGENCY APPLE VALLEY AGENCY APPLE VALLEY AGENCY COMPUTERS 0OILER/MACHINRY PUBLIC EMPL BOND DEPOSITORS FORGRY ACCOUNT NO INV 01-4710 01 -4210 01-4210 01-4210 01-4210 01-4210 01-4210 01-4210 01-4540 039-12 059-14 069-15 129-31 139-12 139 12 174-33 249-42 129-31 01-4320-175-34 01-4233-249-42 01 4343-099-17 01-4343-129-31 72-4343-549-91 02/06/91 2,500.00-AMERICAN BANK PRIN DUE 3/1/91 44-4610-907-00 02/06/91 2.500.00 AMERICAN BANK PRIN DUE 3/1/91 44-4610-907-00 02/06/91 2.500 00 AMERICAN SANK PRINC DUE 3/)/9l 44-4610-907-00 02/06/91 2,500.00-AMERICAN BANK PRIN DUE 3/1/91 44-4610-907-00 02/06/91 25,000.00 AMERICAN BANK PRINC DUE 3/1/91 44-4610-907-0002/06/91 6.987.50 31.987 50 • AMERICAN BANK INT DUE 3/1/91 44-4620-907-00 01-1280-000-00 01-1280-000-00 01-1280-000-00 01-1280-000-00 02/05/91 21 30 AT A T INFO SYSTEM DATA PROC 01-4340-059-1402/OC/91 . 10-AT A T INFO SYSTEM DATA PROC 01-4340-059-U02/06/91 21 20 AT A T INFO SYSTEM DATA PROC 01-4340-069-1502/06/91 32 50 AT A T INFO SYSTEM DATA PROC 01-4340-129-3102/06/91 21.20 AT A T INFO SYSTEM DATA PROC 01-4340-129-3102/06/91 21.20 AT A T INFO SYSTEM DATA PROC 01-4340-l'*4-3302/06/91 21 20 138 SO * AT A T INFO SYSTEM DATA PROC 01-4340-.49-42 02/06/91 S 23 AT A T COMM TELEPHONE 01-4320-039-1202/06/91 7 47 AT A T COMM TELEPHONE 01-4320-129-31 02-U-91 7A0C I i P 0 • MESSAGE • • * -CKS ••■-ChS •••-CKS • * * -CKS •••-CKS i>^ i ►I' ff. ■ nil CITY or ORONO ■•■»- ■*': ... • . i.i-V ;..»■. - CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM description ACCOUNT NO INV 12 /O • 042042 042042042042 02/06/9102/06/01 02/06/91 $1 48 74.00 SI 47 176.95 * ASPLUND COFFEE ASPLUNP COFFEE ASPLUNL. COFFEE COFFEE L.OFFEE COFFEE 01-4382 -039-12 01-4382-129-31 01-4382-174-33 042064 02/06/91 20 SO20 so •BLITZ ONE HR FOIO film/develop 01-4210 il'9-31 04206$02/06/91 199 28 199.28 * BLACKOWIAK & SONS TRASH 01-4343-099-17 042074042074 042074042074 042074 02/06/91 02/06/91 02/06/91 02/06/91 02/06/91 1.361 49 172 00 1.704 86 444.90 1.S06 23 S.189 48 • BONESTROO ROSENE ASN BGNESTROO ROSENE ASN BONESTROO ROSENE ASN BONESTROO ROSENE ASN BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ENG DEC C:. ENG DEC JO ENG DEC 90 ENG DEC 90 ENG DEC 90 01-2040-000-00 24-2040-000-00 72- 2040-000-00 73- 2040-000-00 73-2040-000-00 o oiais> O O > mm02/06/91 02/06/91 34 91 9 87 44.78 • BLACKS ^OTOGRA^flY black: ")TOuKAPHy - IlM Dc VEl P p UM DC VELP 01-4210-129-31 01 -4210 174-33 ft ft ft ft ft a 0420IS 0420IS 042GtS 02/06/91 02/06/01 02/06/01 2 40 9 60 11.00 23 00 * BUDGET PRINTING BUDGET PRINTING BUDGET PRINTING PRINT MAPS COPY 01-4210-249-42 01-4322-249-42 01-4322-290-61 042114 02/06/91 398.80 398.80 ■ CITYVIEW PLHBG 4 HTG REPAIR MOTOR 72-4343-549-91 •••*•• 042133042133 02/06/91 02/06/91 8 00 232 00 240 00 • COMM-REV SALES TAX COMM-REV SALES TAX JAN sales tax JAN SALES TAX 01-3500-000-00 72-2222-000-00 042142 02/06/91 SOI 38 501.38 • COPY DUP PR INC TONER 01-1261-000-00 042143 02/06/91 8 OS COHMERCIAL LIFE/GRP i-EB INS 01-4152-039-12 02-11-81 page • • • -CKS •••-CKS •**-CKS ■ ft ■•CKS ••-ChS « ft ft •CKS *••-CKS ft ft ft •CKS J Im IBfl cm OP ORONO CHECK m.DATE AMOUNT1-•42143 02/08/81 25.15 042143 02/06/81 15.75r04214302/08/81 3.40 042143 02/08/81 57.98 042143 042143 02/08/81 02/08/81 6.75 16.51104214302/08/81 1.42f.042143 02/08/81 2 13 042143 02/08/81 15137.89 042154 02/08/81 160.10 042154 02/06/81 87.90 ■ 248.70 • » « » 0 * h 04219B 02/08/91 91.52 042198 02/08/81 5,500 00 042188 02/08/81 58 00 5.656 52 k a mi a 0 • t 042223 02/06/91 127 50 •127.50 ••••■• 042230 02/06/81 36 18 36.18 1 042243 02/06/81 750.001750.00 i • ••••• f 042258 02/06/91 11 4004225802/06/91 113 31 k 042258 02/06/91 23.35 i 042258 02/06/91 11.08L -159 14 042257 02/06/91 120 381^.1-120.38 F C42258 02/06/81 54 10 54.10 r'•••••• *. 042288 02/06/91 444 00 r Vf' ... CHECK REGISTER VENDOR COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP LIFE/GRP LIFE/GRP LIFE/QRP LIFE/QRPLIFE/GRP LIFE/QRPLIFE/GRP LIFE/GRP CYS UNIFORMS CYS UNIFORMS ROLF E ERICKSON ROLF E ERICKSON ROLF £ ERICKSON FINANCE & COMMERCE FISCHENICH/OAN GAB BUSINESS SERVICE GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO QERHARDSON/JOHN 6LENW000 INGLEWOOD GOVERNMT TRAING SERV ITEM DESCRIPTION FEB INS FEB INS FEB INS FEB INS FEB INS FEB INS FEB INS FEB INS FEB INS UNIFORM CORNICK UNIFORM FRITZLER SUPPLIES FEB FEE POSTAGE SUBSCRIPTION K-9 SCHOOL LStl# INS DED REIM OIL PART PARTS PARTS JOHN MILEAGE WATER CLASS/TOMCZYK ACCOUNT NO INV 01-4IS2 01-4152 01-4152 01-4152 01-4152 01-4152 72- 4152 73- 4152 74- 4152 069-15 121-31 126-31 129-31 174-33 249-42 549-91 fS9-92 590-93 01-4221-126-31 01-4221-129-31 01-4210-059-14 01-4306-059-14 01-4321 059-14 01-4240-129-31 01-4244-129-31 73-2040-000-00 01-4220-129-31 01-4232-249-42 01-4232-290-61 72-4232-549-91 01-4381-249-42 01-4231-099-17 01-4356- 129-31 02-11-91 ®AGE 3 • P O • MESSAGE ■••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS • • •-CKS • • * -CKS • a •-CKS It m m -CKS ifs;'L- 1991 CITY OF 090N0 042397 042397 02/U9/91 02/09/91 CHECK REGISTER 02-11-01 PAGE 1 CHECK MO.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV. IPO • MESSAGE y 444.00 m 042270 02/06/91 37.74 37.74 ■ GRAINQER-W W SUPPLIES 73-4234-569-92 ■••-CKS i 042272 042272 042272 042272 042272 02/06/91 02/06/91 02/06/91 02/06/91 02/06/91 250 77 80.50 18 98 45 74 9 20 405 19 m G & K SERVICES G 4 K SERVICES Q & K SERVICES G 4 K SERVICES G 4 K SERVICES UNIFORMS RUGS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS 01-4221-249-42 01-4231-129-31 72- 4221-549-91 73- 4221-569-92 74- 4221-590-93 ** i 042210 02/06/91 73.03 73 03 m HACH CHEMICAL CO CHLORINE 72-4234-549-91 •••-CKS r •••-CKS f.>• 042303 02/06/91 1,881.75 1,881.75 m HENN CTY FIN OIV DEC RGOM/BOARD 01-2223-000-00 f: L'j •••••>•••-CKS mL, * I' ‘ 042301 02/06/91 183 95 183 95 • HENN CTY SHERIFF OPT DEC BOOKING FEE 01-2223-000-00 y ; ■• •••■ ■•••-CKS 042330 042330 02/06/91 02/06/91 150.75 ISO 75 301 50 m ICMA RETIREMNT TRUST ICMA RETIREMNT TRUST ICMA 1/21 TO 2/3 ICMA 1/7 TO 1/20 01-4140-039-12 01-4140-039 «•' k' r •••-CKS 0423IS 02/06/91 5 25 5 25 m KEAVENYS DRUG SUPPLIES 74-4210-590-93 ■••-CKS C- . i ' 042319 02/06/91 10,351.95 10.351 95 m KEYS WELL DRILLING WELL PYMNT «8/FINAL 72-2060-000-00 •••-CKS 042395 04239S 02/09/91 02/09/91 14.00 264.40 278.40 m KOEHNENS STANDARD KOCHNENS STANDARD OIL AUTO REPAIR 01-4220-129-31 01-4341-129-31 63 SO 14 90 KUEHN-THOHAS KUEHN-THOMAS MILEAGE JAN MILEAGE JAN 01-4381-069-15 01-4381-174-33 •“•-CKS t/J:-mi ciT'OF ORONO CHECK REGISTERrCHECK ^DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV fif 042997 042997 02/06/91 02/06/91 5.9$ 20.95 105.20 • KUEHN-THOMAS KUEHN-THOMAS mileage JAN MILEAGE JAN 01-4381-295-65 73-4381-569-92 r 042400 02/06/91 2.220.00 2,220.00 • KUSTOM SIGNALS INC 2 RADAR UNITS 01-4560-129-31 V •••••ft 042404 042404 02/06/91 02/06/91 137 02 35.10 172.12 • THE LAKER THE LAKER AD AO 01-4323-039-12 01-4323-174-33 042421 042421 042421 02/06/91 02/06/91 02/06/91 30.023.00 440.00 51.349.00 81.612 00 • LMCIT NO STAR RISK LMCIT NO STAR RISK LMCIT NO STAR RISK EXCESS LIAB SPCL MULTI PERIL SPCL MULTI PERIL 01-1280-000-00 01-1280-000-00 01 -1280-000-00 ■•■>■• r F.042437 042497 02/06/91 02/06/91 54.60 7.687.50 7.742 10 • CITY OF LONG LAKE CITY OF LONG LAKE 4TH QTR water 1990 4T.>1 OTR WATER 1990 01-2224-000-00 72-2224-000-00 '.1 ''k\ 042441 02/06/91 954.60 354.60 • LONG LAKE TIRE SERV REPAIR 01-4342-249-42 -to ir 042441 042441 042444 02/06/91 02/06/91 02/06/91 118.00 290.00 1.925.00 2,333 00 • LANIER VOICE PROD LANIER VOICE PROD LANIER VOICE PROD PAPER MAINT AGREE FAX MACHINE 01-4210-129-31 01-4340-129-31 01-4560-129-31 fc • ■•••a1 1 042450 02/06/91 15 00 15 00 • MINNESOTA GFOA MEMBERSHIP 01-4380-069-15 t-042492 02/06/91 1.579 60 1.579 60 • MARTINS NAVARRE 66 AUTO REPAIR 01-4341-129-31 1-042442 02/06/91 • 72.80 72 80 • MPLS HEALTH DEPT LAB TEST NOV-DEC 01-2224-000-CO •••••• fc.'.4' Efi"''Urb' ■MS-'-'-- 02-11-91 PAGE • P 0 • MESSAGE •••-CKS ‘••-CKS • ••-CKS ■ ■ •-CKS • •*-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS a ■ *-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS I Iftl cm OF OftONO CHECK NO. DATE 0424IS •il.' t 042491 042S4S 04254S 042542 042542 042542 042542 042542 042542 042542 042562 042562 042562 042545 042571 042571 042571 042542 042597 ••■■•a 042001 I ' Mft:--. I 02/06/91 02/06/91 02/06/91 02/06/91 02/04/91 02/04/91 02/04/91 02/06/91 02/04/91 02/04/91 02/04/91 02/04/91 02/06/91 02/06/91 02/04/91 02/06/91 02/06/91 02/04/91 02/06/91 02/06/91 02/06/91 AMOUNT 27 00 27.00 • 128.32 128.32 * 149.20 149.20 298.40 281 129 233 2 161 16 14 153 491 11 1 495 42 77 01 94 62 04 21 69 62 08 40 • 1.069.93 1.069 93 « 75.000.00 18.731 25 200 00 93.931 25 ‘ 26.26 24.24 4.066 33 4.066 33 * 2,674.00 2,674 00 • CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION MPLS OXYGEN CO MN CELLULAR TELE NAVARRE AUTO REPAIR NAVARRE AUTO REPAIR NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NORWEST BANK MINN NA NORWEST BANK MINN NA NORWEST BANK MINN NA OMAN/LYLk PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PANNELL KERR FORSTER DEMURRAGE TEIE PHONE CAR WASH TCKT CAR WASH TCKT UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES ST LIGHTS PRINC DUE 3/1/91 INT DUE 3/1/91 AGENT FEE 3/1/91 MILEAGE PERA 1/21-2/3 1990 AUDIT PYMNT ACCOUNT NO INV 01-4232-249-42 01-4320-129-31 01-4341-129-31 01 -4341-249-42 01 -4324 01-4324 01-4324 01-4324 01-4324 01-4324 72- 4324 73- 4324 73- 4324 74- 4324 099-17 099-17 129-31 175-34 249-42 290-61 549-91 569-91 569-92 590-93 01-4325-249-42 43-4610-906-00 43-4620-906-00 43-4630-906-00 01-4381-174-33 01-2031-000-00 01-1299-000-00 02-U-91 PAGE 4 • P 0 I MESSAGE « M 41 -CKS •’•-CKS ■ • • -CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS a N «-CKS •••-CKS If r k m 'mKh v;l ^ - l-vI ■*!■. I.- i' Iftl CITV OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 02-11-91 PAGE 7 CHECK NO.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV • P.O. • MESSAGE ft ft ft ft ft ft «•" -CKS 042C1S 042C1S 042tlS 02/04/41 02/04/01 02/04/91 32. $S 9.34 4.20 48 10 * PERRYS VENTURES INC PERRYS VENTURES INC PERRYS VENTURES INC CAR WASH CAR WASH CAR WASH 01-4342-249-42 72- 4342-549-91 73- 4342-569-92 ftftft ftftft • * * -CKS 042427 02/04/91 47.25 47 25 * PITNEY BOWES POSTAGE 01-4321-129-31 042421 042424 042424 02/04/91 02/04/91 02/06/91 11.019.78 283.10 40.00 11,342.88 • POPHAM HAIK A ASSOC POPHAM HAIK A ASSOC POPHAM HAIK A ASSOC LEGAL DEC 90 LEGAL DEC 90 LEGAL DEC 90 01-2040-000-00 24-2040-000-00 72-2040-000-00 •••-CKS 042431 02/04/91 3,390.00 3,390.00 * POLKA DOT RECYCLING JAN FEE 01-4392-295-65 •■•••••**-CKS 042434 042434 02/04/91 02/04/41 187.75 107.35 295 10 • PRAIRIE OFFSET PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING OMA'I 6 CARDS 01-4322-039-12 01-4322-174-33 •••••••**-CKS 0424S7 02/04/91 59 98 59.98 • RFG PET A SUPPLY CO DOG FOOD 01-4244-129-31 0424S4 02/04/91 3.50 3 50 • R C INOENTIFICATIONS ID 01-4210-129-31 ■ ••-CKS 042474 02/04/91 2.041.40 2.041.40 • ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 01-1260-000-00 ft ftftft ft ft •••-CKS C42474 042474042474 02/04/91 02/06/91 02/04/91 237 00 1,037.52 148.51 1,423.03 • SAFE BENEFITS SAFE BENEFITS SAFE BENEFITS SPECIAL BLI.G WITHHOLDG FEB FEE 01-1050-000-00 01-1050-000-00 01-4306-299-72 •••-CKS 042444 02/04/41 300.00 300.00 • LAURIE K SCHEFFLER JAN MTG 01-4306-039-12 rA'} ■ ••lift ft* ri/v 11 \-^'- « « A •CKS V: f; 1ft 1 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE is;. a CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV 042740 02/09/91 197.90 STREICHERS INSTALL EOUP 8162 01-4550-129-31 i 042740 02/06/91 23 75 S7RE1CHERS REPLACE STUN GUN 01-4560-129-31 921.95 m V- f- 042752 02/06/91 2.000 50 2,000.50 m SUBURBAN TIRE INC TIRES LOADER 01-4342-249-42 042770 02/09/91 960.51 960.51 » TRACY OIL CO DIESEL 01-4220-249-42 L. 1^:042792 02/09/91 135.00 TWIN CITIES OICTN 5V TAPES 01-4210-129-31 135.00 ft • 0429IS 02/09/91 78.44 us WEST COMMUN TELEPHONE 01-4320-039-12 r’042115 02/09/91 78.44 US WEST COMMUN TELEPHONE 01-4320-059-14 h 042S1S 0421IS 02/09/91 39.22 US WEST COMMUN TELEPHONE 01-4320-069-15 (■02/04/91 176.55 US WEST COMMUN TELEPHONE 01-4320-129-31 f 0421IS 02/09/91 78.44 US WEST COMMUN TELEPHONE 01-4320-174-33 r 042S1S 02/09/91 56.83 US WEST COMMUN TELEPHONE 01-4320-175-34 0421IS 02/09/91 78.44 US WEST COMMUN TELEPHONE 01-4320-249-42r0429IS02/09/91 11.77 US WEST COMMUN TELEPHONE 72-4320-549-91 042flS 02/09/91 54.06 US WEST COMMUN ADV 72-4320-549-91 0421IS 02/09/91 27.46 US WEST COMMUN TELEPHONE 73-4320-569-92 04291S 02/09/91 78.49 US WEST COMMUN TELEPHONE 74-4320-590-93 >.■042I1S 02/09/91 121.39 879.93ft US WEST COMMUN ADV 74-4323-590-93 ; S- , •••»■• * i r, ;r' 042117 02/09/91 19.85 16.85 ft VESSCO INC PARTS 72-4232-549-91 04293S 02/09/91 46 SO WARNING LITES OF MN FLASHER 01-4331-24P . M l> 46.50 ft r*042142 02/09/91 1.560.98 WAV2ATA-CITV OF 4TH OTR WATER 1990 72-2224-000-00 1,560 98 ft s ■04294S ■02/09/91 15.08 WECKMAN STEPHEN MILEAGE 01-4381-174-33 i ;15.08 ft 02-U'Bl PAGE I $ 9.0. I HESSAQE • • • -CKS « • •-CKS • • «-CKS •**-CKS -••-CKS •••-CKS > • •-CKS •••-CKS 'fl-.5-l; V- ''i IMl CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO IN' i N • N ft m 042161 02/06/91 81.50 81.50 ft WESTSIDE EQUIP REPAIR PUMP 01-4342-099-17 042175 02/06/91 8 28 8 28 ft WRIGHT HENN ELECTRIC UTILITIES 01-4324-249-42 042901 02/06/91 161.57 161 57 ft DARE AMERICA DARE SUPPLIES 01-4243-129-31 042902 02/06/91 61.75 61.75 ft NORTH STAR TURF GRASS SEED 74-4231-590-93 042903 02/06/91 2.400 00 2.400 00 ft NORTHWEST MECHANICAL 4TH FINAL PYMNT 73-4531-569-92 042904 042904 02/06/91 02/06/91 SO 7 20 8.00 ft REGAL CLEANERS REGAL CLEANERS CLEAN BLANKET CLEAN BALNKET 01-4342-129-31 01-4342-129-31 042905 02/06/91 154 28 154 28 ft RAY ALLEN MANUF INC JUNTE PANTS 01-4244-129-31 042906 02/06/91 328 74 328 74 ft TREADWAY GRAPHICS DARE SUPPLIES 01-4243-129-31 042907 02/06/91 204 29 204 29 ft KRONER CO PARTS 74-4232-590-93 042901 02/06/91 526.00 526.00 ft JIM MCCAUL REPLACE CARPET 01-4343-099-17 042909 02/06/91 208.00 208.00 ft DORSEY A WHITNEY DOG AT LARGE CLAIM 01-2040-000-00 042910 042910 02/06/91 02/06/91 1.000 00 900 00- 100.00 ft MPELRA MPELRA DUES DUES 01-4380-129-31 01-4380-129-31 04-2911 02/06/91 66,829.17 66,829 17 ft RICHARD CONST PUMPHOUSE 43 PYMT4 72-4531-437-85 042912 02/06/91 1,402 00 1,402 00 ft GOPHER SIGN CO.PARTS 01-4233-249-42 042915 02/0.«/91 300 00 300 00 ft NO SHORE DR MARINA DUST CONTROL AGRMNT 73-4399-433-8) 02-11-91 PAGE 9 .' * ■•-CKS •• • -CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS si M.Ir*?; 1001 CITV Of ORONO CHECK NO. DATE CHECK REQZSTERAMOUNTVENDOR ITEM OESCRIPTI^'N O2-11-01 PAGE 10 ACCOUNT NO INV. • f 0 i MESSAGE■••-CKS138.720 12 FUNO 01 TOTAL 45$.10 FUNO 24 TOTAL 93,931.2$FUNO 43 TOTAL 31.887.50 FUND 44 TOTAL 89.186.97 FUNO 72 TOTAL 6.186.56 FUND 73 TOTAL 462 /O FUNO 74 TOTAL 360,960 20 TOTAL GENERAL FUND PERM IMPROVE REVOLVING F 1980 IMP BOND 0/S FUND 1982 IMP BONO 0/S FUND WATER OPERATING FUNO SEWER OPERATING FUNO GOLF COURSE OPERATING FO '1 P X w A [■ '■ '• w dw.nCi '.V ra'i L UNCH.MEEIMM FEB 11 19U CITYOFOMNO r mmwrn . ., A.. MimiTBS OP THE REGULAR ORONO PARK COMMISSION MEETINGHELD DECEMBER 4, 1990 A discussion followed on the merits of a separated trail versus an 8 foot wide shoulder on both sides of the road as a trail. John Gerhardson will bring estimated costs on an 8 foot wide shoulder trail to the next meeting. Susan Wilson will talk to other communities on the merits of a separated versus connected bike/hike trail. The Park Commission will meet on Saturdayi February 2nd at the Middle School at 1:00 p.m. to check right-of-way widths on Old Crystal Bay Road. INFORMATION REGARDING INTERN FOR PARK PLAN - Steve Weckman provided information to the Commission on the University of Minnesota providing students to help in a revision of our ten year Park Plan. We will fill out the application and John Gerhardson will talk to the University of Minnesota and check references on the guality of help from other such projects. SUBDIVISION REVIEW - The Commission reviewed two subdivisions in terms of procuring easements or receiving Park Dedication Funds. For both Subdivision #1615 and #1617 we requested Park Dedication Funds. HEN BUSINESS - John Gerhardson suggested that Chairman, Richard the Council in the next month or so to bring Park recommendations on Sandy Beach restrictions for Sum.. Mr. Flint agreed. ADJOURNMENT 9:30 P.M. The regular PaiX Commisnion meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m. The next meeting will be Monday, February 4, 1991 at 7:00 PeRI* MINUTES OP THE REGULAR ORONO PARK COMMISSION MEETINGHELD JANUARY 7, 1991 ATTENDANCE 7:10 P.M. - The Park Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Chairperson Richard Flint, Susan Wilson, Phil Bradley, Lester Kelley, Alexander Vongries and Bruce Kokcil. John Gerhardson, Public Works Director represented the City staff. Jim Gilbert was absent. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - : . TOPICS OP DISCUSSION: - Community Education Coordination - Map of School District Report on Bike/Hike Trail Information regarding Intern for Park Plan Subdivision Review NITY EDUCATION COORDINATION - MAP OP SCHOOL DISTRICT - Alex Vongries presented the School District map onto which he had marked the Orono Park properties. There was further discussion on what to include on this map to help the communities plan together for needed recreational facilities. The Commission asked that the proposed bike/hike trail for Orono be included on this map so that other communities could attach to it, and that we also include county, state, and private recreational facilities. Alex Vongries will mark these additional locations onto the District map and will deliver it to John Gerhardson who will include our larger colored map of recreational areas in Orono and send them to Toni Berglund at Community Education. we hope this will encourage the other communities in the Orono School District to do the same. BIKB/HIKB TRAILS REPORT - Easement on County Road 6 (south side between Willow Drive and Old Crystal Bay Road North) - John Gerhardson contacted A1 Yngvie, the spokesman for Orono Plaza Partners, the owners of this property, to express our interest in procuring an easement for a bike/hike trail. Mr. Yngvie will get back to him. Dick Flint reported on a meeting that he and Phil Bradley attended with Doug Bryant, Superintendent of Hennepin County Parks. They discussed the feasibility of a separated bike/hike trail connecting Baker Park and the Luce Line. If the trail were to be on Old Crystal Bay Road it could also connect Noerenberg Park, a County Park on County Road 51. The County was interested in this prospect and estimated the cost of a separated trail 8 feet wide and blacktopped at $75,000 a mile. Mr. Flint suggested that once Orono determines what we want, we make a proposal to the Hennepin County Park Board for support on our project. ^h^■• i“- » W>m- i-tia Si- M-:- m,i- t''‘ PA^- ■r . 1 •' r::U 'r":S' i.m Hvr. ■>V'r ‘■ -- ■ i-; ^ '■- ;s ). ‘.r: •:♦■••■• = $ 1. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT WATER STRUCTURES & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE AGENDA 7:30 a.m., Saturday, February 9, 1991 Wayzata Norvest Bank Building ConmuniCy Room, First Level #135 900 East Wayzata Boulevard, Wayzata FE3 4 1991 David Thonas Bayshore Second Addition, recommendatijn from counsel assessing applicant's license Order and covenant governing the devel opment 2. Bowers public hearing background information 3. The Harborage public hearing background information 4. Proposed Code amendment to S2.ll Conversion of Use 5. Wetland Inventory progress update Multiple dock length study lidential Temporary Low Water Extension policy review Multiple dock and DMA license renewals Deposit refund: William Schritter permanent dock application, $100 Additional business recommended by the committee ENVIRONMENT 1. Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force, Chair Reese A. Bid results for barging/trucking contracts B. Budget update C. Applicants for Project Manager position 2. Additional business recommended by the committee MTEt Additional attachMnts to follow 2-1-91 iirliirfiai ‘'--nsnn : -----...a: i.r '.■r I- I * l; tiv . . 4 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT473-7033L.M.C.D. MEETING SCHEDULE February 1991 Saturday Water Structures & Environment Comnittee 7t30 a.ffl. I Norwest Bank Building Wayaata 900 East Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 135 Superior Street, east entrance Friday Eurasian Ujter Milfoil Task Force 8:30 a.m., Norwest Bank Building Wayzata 900 East Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 135 Superior Street, east entrance Monday Presidents Day Holiday, LMCD office closed Thursday LMCD Annual Dinner 6:15/7:30 p.m. Lord Fletchers of the Lake, Spring Park Monday Lake Use Committee 4:30 p.m., Norwest Bank Building Wayzata 900 East Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 135 Superior Street, east entrance Wednesday Public Hearings: Bowers Setback, Length Variance Harborage Variance 7:00 p.m., Tonka Bay City Hall LMCD Board of Directors' Regular Meeting 7:30 p.m., Tonka Bay City Hall 1-31-91 . .. p»' ir. fivfe- LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 473-7033 EVENTS SCHEDULE February 1991 Sunday Lafayette Club private ice fishing party/sleigh rides 11:00 a.m. - 1:00 p.m. Crystal Bay Friday 8 Excelsior Chamber of Commerce Chili Open 10:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. Excelsior Bay, Gideons Bay Friday & Saturday 8 9 Wayzaca Chamber of Commerce Chilly Open Golf & Fishing 9:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. Wayzata Bey (golf) Sunday 1:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m. Wayzata Bay (Wayzata Fire Department ice fishing) Saturdays and Sundays Lord Fletcher’s of the Lake Broomball 6:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. Coffee Cove 1-29-91 % li..Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission 443 OAK STREET • EXCELSIOR. MINNESOTA 55331 • (6121474.5539 DATE:January 30, 1991 TO;LMCCC MEMBER CITIES JAN 3 1 1991 FROM:Jennifer Watta, Cable Administrator RE:NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Enclosed is a NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING to be held by the Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission in conjunction with its annual cable system evaluation. Please post this notice in public view at least ten days prior to the date of the hearing. More informa­ tion on the evaluation will be coming to you in the monthly meeting packets. If you have questions, please contact me at 474-5539. Thank you. 0%'' . ' ''(■■? t ... * V ■'i: II. If .7 A 1 *V #• ■r;^':'>- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CONCERNING CABLE TELEVISION COMMUNICATIONS Notlc* la haraby given that a public hearing will be held by the Lake Minnetonka Cable Communlcatlone Connlselon on Tuesday^ February 19, 1991 at 5:30 P.M. or aa aoon thereafter aa partlea can reaaonably be heard, at the Lake Minnetonka Cable Coeelaalon Office, Room 204, Excalalor Community Center, corner of Hey. 7 and Co. Rd. 19, Excelalor, Mlnneaota, SS331. The CoMlaaion eonalata of the Mlnneaota cltlea of Deephaven, Exoolaior, Greeneood, Long Lake, Medina, Minnetonka Beach, Hinnetriata, Orono, St. Bonlfaciua, Shoreeood. Spring Park, Tonka Bay, Victoria, and Woodland. The hearing ia called purauant to the regulrementa of the Cable Televlalon Franchlae Ordinance for conducting periodic evaluatlona of the cable ayatam. Toplca to be dlacuaaed in­ clude, but are not limited to: ayatam perforeance, aervlcea provided, community acceaa, cuatoner conplalnta, and line exten- aion poliolea. Anyone having an intereat in cable televiaion communlca- tiona ia invited to attend. - --7.i.it It Pii.i 'WiU:&4\.'^-MMsm r- ih• f » a«». i‘04 :*io STflr? • s c Pti BOX ito •.VASECA MN 5~>-1 S07 335 5975 : AX r4UMBEn 507 sns 45»7 -.*1 «*. '“■«.■ -* ^ • V44 *7 -« January 28, 1991 Jannifar Hatts« Administrator Laka Minnatonka Cable CoBBunications Commission 443 Oak Straat Bxcalsior, MN 55331 FEB t 199^ Dear Ms. Matts: Triax Cablavision would like to provide you with information ralativa to the rearrangement of your community's cable television channel lina-up and provide you with information relative to our naw rates and charges which are scheduled to go into effect March 1, 1991. On January 10, 1991, the Trinity Broadcast Network (TBN), previously eablacast on a time-shared basis on channel 45, was moved to cable channel IS to provide 24 hour a day coverage. American Movie Classics (ANC) will remain on channel 45, and will also provide 24 hours a day of programming. Many subscribers have taken the time to telephone our office and express their satisfaction with these programming changes. On March 1st, The Family Channel, which is located on channel 32, is now going to be cablecaat on channel 16; and ESPN, the sports channel, will simultaneously be moved from channel 47 to channel 32. Channel 47 will become a channel reserved for future use. In addition, a second public access channel, channel 21, will be activated to facilitate programs created through the local access studios serving the Triax metro communities. Trlax Cablavision has made every effort to improve picture quality and enhance service while doing our best to contain operating expenses. Some costs however, such as program license fees, employee health Insurance, postage costa, and gasoline prices are out of our control and we have experienced significant Increases la each of these categories. Iffectlve March 1, 1991, the monthly rate for basic cable service will be $13.99 and $20.99 for expanded basic service. The monthly rate for Showtime and Cluemax will be $10.95 and $7.95 per month respectively, idille 8B0 and The Disney Channel will remain unchanged at $10.95 and $4.95 per month. A single additional outlet will now cost $3.50; however, a subscriber may continue to have up to four additional outlets at the present rate of $4.95 per month. \ h d\. »?’-V' m I. :• Myfill'’ ■ ‘ 'i.-Sjr January 28, 1991 Page 2 Subscribers wiri- continue to receive a package discount when sub** scribing to KM and Cinenax at $16.90 per month ($2.00 savings)* and HBO/Cinenax/Oisney at $20.85 per month ($3.00 savings). These pac)ca9es stake our movie services even more affordable and since movie tickets for a family of four cost nearly $18.00 for just one movie* the entertainment available on the movie services from Triax remain a great bargain. A news bulletin describing the above changes is being sent to all the subscribers via the regular monthly statement on February 1* 1991* which will serve as advance notification prior to the scheduled changes which will occur on March 1* 1991. In anticipation of discuss­ ing these matters with our subscribers* our Customer Service Represen­ tatives have been thoroughly briefed regarding these issues and will provide the customer with any information they need or request relative to the changes we are sMdeing to their service, we will also provide informative messages on our cable channel 19 to further keep custasMrs advised of the changes we make throughout the months of February and March. UMPtlMOIMC OCR OOMWI*TOO Xn the past decade* the cable television industry has doubled its eomsdtment to quality television reception and has spent more than $2 billion over the course of the last year purchasing equipment* iaq>roving distribution lines while replacing deteriorating cable* and producing programming that fits the diverse viewing preferences of the many families who subscribe to cable television. 1991 will bo no exception* and Triax Cablevision is proud to bring its customers this ever-improving variety* choice* quality* and diversity of service. The enclosed news bulletin being sent to all subscribers highlights these changes. Finally* every employee at Triax is dedicated to providing prompt* courteous service when subscribers have questions or service needs, we will continue this commitment to your comnunity and the subscribers in the years to come. Thank you for your support and the opportunity to serve your community* and please call me personally if you have any questions. Sincerely yours* i9 Pauli Wasarow Megional Manager Bnclosuret Subscriber Notification Bulletin mr-'•iSrE'!5 ’.' It- %K7 h' iy I&- lBfi: & i; m 1-. S:; b'i- m’p- :a % ■•?- i <v-I V’* ^:Z ■ -'V^-ffe. &jfi:. fr ,=v I i? TRiAKIII CASLEVGON 1 fcsBnum Triax Cablevision is dedicated to providing its subscribers with the best cable ser­ vice possible. However, the cost of doing business...any kind of busi ­ ness... continues to escalate. In or­ der to keep up with increasing costs, it is necessary to ac^ust our monthly fee for Basic cable service. Effective with your next billing statement, the monthly rate for Basic service will be $ 15.99. Expanded Basic service will be $20.99. The optional services — Showtime. CInemax. and a single additional outlet will be increased by $ 1.00 each per month. Cable television is still one of America ’s great consumer bargains. Tor less than a dollar a day. you can receive 24 hours of great entertain ­ ment in the comfort of your own home. Thank you for subscribing to Triax Cablevision. we look forward to serving you in 1991. 1991 A LA CARTE PRICES NOrmiLY PRICE Basic Service....................................$13.99 Expanded Basic ................................$20.99 Home Box Office (HBO).....................$10.95 Showtime..........................................$10.95 Qnemax ............................................$ 7.95 The Disney Channel ..........................$ 4.95 1 Additional Outlet............................$ 3.50 24 Additional Outlets........................$ 4.95 Remote Control............................$ 3.50 1991 CONBOIATIOn RATES HBO/anENAX ....................................$16.90 (save $2.00) HBO/CIHEMAX/DISHEY.......................$20.85 (save $3.00) i-er < f ■• 1WEST HENNEPIN RECYCUNG COMMISSION QfMnlMd-'ndependenca-Long Lake-Loretto-Mapie Plairv-f^adina-Orono 1S20 Maplt Av«. Maple Plain, MN 55359 479*2540 January 17, 1991 Hayor and Councl1members City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: 1990 Rec'/cllng Tonnage and Mv^tement Dear Mayor and Councilmembers: I am very pleased to report to you the final recycling tonnage collected In your city for the year 1990: Curbside collection Hob1le-drop-off sites Total collected in 1990 68C.18 tens _36_.10 tons 716.28 tons Your city abated 22.9% of its estimated 3130 ton residential waste stream. This is above the city’s 1989 abatement of 18.4%, and stunningly above Hennepin County’s 1990 goal of 10%. With Information provided by Polka Dot Recycling I have estimated that aproximately 60% of the residents in Orono use their curbside recycling service regularly. I predict that Orono will again exceed the county's new goal of 16% waste abatement with their 1991 curbside and drop jff recycling program. As a member of West Hennepin Recycling CMin»niS8ion. you will be pleased to know that the overall waste abatement of all the cities In the Coirmisslon was 21.371 for curbside and drop-off recycling alone. Thank you for your enthusiasm and support of this program throughout 1990: It has been a ploasurn working with your city, and I look forward to another good year In 1991. Very truly yours. Margie Vlgoren Recycling Coordinator Funded by WHRC ht//i 80^ JunJing by Hennepin Counry Printed on Recycled Paper >.*Aw, k;.»V.; Tim 1 r?: tT;- b'- rk- <:' ■:' r:..' mp;. M-pn- ‘■.Sr*y^-T;i 0- ■t-5--;: Hrfe association of metro|X)lifaniruxiicipalities WHO SUFFERS when aid is CUT ? £**«»»+»<»/ p SSNN • ^ j 1 lalga/haca:^ PEOPL E SUFFER NOT cities ‘f’' 4. 1 association ofmetropolitanmt’niapclities 1991 AMM PRIORITY POLICIES/ISSUES 1. LEVY LIMIT REPEAL: The AMM strongly supports elimination of levy limits now; or at a Binlmun, adding flexibility for growth in 1992 and allowing levy limits to sunset for payable 1993 as programmed. 2. PRESERVATION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID (LGA): The AMM supports a need based LGA program to help offset the significant differences in local property taxes created by tax base and/or service need differences. 3. PROPERTY TAX REFORM AND TWO CLASS RATES FOR HOMESTEADS: The AMM supports property tax reform measures which would provide relief for excessively high taxed properties and which would not create an unfair tax burden among property taxpayers of various property classes or regions. This would include a return to a two tier class system for homestead property. I8TORATION OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCE (TIF) AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: The AMM believes the Legislature should study and develop an overall state economic development policy. Such a policy would define the role cities should play in economic development. To meet immediate needs, several of the more restrictive 1990 TIF amendments should be repealed. 5. HASTE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES: The AMM believes the state sales tax on solid waste collection services should be dedicated to waste management activities only and that a portion should be used to help support local recycling programs. 6. BOUSING AMD MEI6B [OOD LIVABILITY: The AMM will support legislative initiatives that would provide cities with the tools, funding and programs to strengthen and preserve neighborhoods, including more state resources to deal with deteriorating and inadequate housing for low income persons. 183 university avenue east, zi saui. minnesota 55101 (612) 227-e :‘v'rwf';.P11;^ v.Vg-,f. te'-"" iif:;. €-5-■■ LGA and Property Tax Relief Smaller Shares of State Spending FY 1982 General Fund Budge I LGA 8% FY 1991 General Fund Budget Higher Educ. 17% Prop Tax Reliel 17% 1^Higher Educ. 18% iilii late Agencies Welfare 12% Prop. Tax Rel. 10% ;{ A Other 12% Welfare 14% State Agencies 8% $4.15 billion $7.01 billion Source: Thomee Reeeerch Bated oil Finance Dept, data League of MInneeota Citiee. 12/3/90. .1 'A '•i Eh m i'. P e r c e n t I n c r e a 8 e GROWTH IN STATE AID TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS Fiscal 1984 vs. Fiscal 1991 City aid up less than inflation. 27% Schools Counties Cities Inflation Source: Thomas Research Bssed on Finance Dept, data 1 League of Minnesota Cities* 11/20/90. LOCAL GOVERNMENT SPENDING INCREASES Between 1980 and 1988 ;iy r- ., 25 (in dollars adjusted for inflation) 20 15 10 22.0% 3.3% CITY (per capita) Source: State S Legia. Auditors Offices COUNTY (per capita) SCHOOL (per student) i LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES. 11/13/90. m -" ■f% f-'-iI"' ':^- X U-- •:•* L'--*- :=V' ^i-1^:; l«i<;i:' hI' I- H.<h ' -I.:.'- •■•* ! -. ■ f * V; 'x\ ^ '•-% -f ■ '•n^' m vr-X! V . :V^.-m\*'4/ 'vr ^i-.: ^ .y-t-':f?!!; mV' X'-- X. ;> P e r c e n t C h a n g e CHANGE IN MN PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT Between 1980 and 1989 # of Fulhtime Equivalents, per capita/per student 20 ig-4% 15 - 10 “5 - - 6.9% -10 Cities Schools Counties State Source; Bureau of the Census. ^/Ihm l-eague of Minnesota Cities. 11/12/90. h i % |:V b r. K:- *'s:' 0'mm- UV:p Wt ■1f'- & r PER CAPITA CITY SPENDING $500 (in constant 1980 dollars) $400 $300 $200 $100 $0 8otfrcs: Slat* AvdHer ’a Office MS mw 1980 1981 1982 1983 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 11/12/00. I'nhii •111 Ftgnre4-3 MMn PIMI N»t r^op&rty Twm Dy incofm O*oip Myaoi* 1986 Min #IMI rm M » « ie cm 'h5'^'r «A 01 01 01 l/> £ j 01 1^1 y 2 ^ *• 2 « 9 K 9 « 5 w •A (SS.2! HRD Ofiphi ''j- ;■ V ■4' = r <■ • Figure 44 .■,-.y MMfi ^livil Mi vropirty Tax m a Mreantagi or ineoiw by ineona Qroip ^abio iMB fe:Piimi /=. r-;. cm HRDGftpliics M fh- f: K ., t- [" .. ? • V R*- f:; K. Sr-’, kf:'- ;:h ,; P:- r^x Wi .■ f'l'P.. 'J-' ■mxfe>- i.r: ■‘ 's--I?'..w p«>-' '. >,V‘ •1.' m^' %x.w- linfciiig Miliflcsota Property Taxes and Incomes*1 K •. • j H ■ • . M’ A I ' I SS/IOOorlew SSJOOI-SISJ $1S/»1-S S2VI01-S3SJ »S4lin*<4Sj$4s/ni-$ssj SSS4I01-S6SJ 165,001 - S 7Sj $n001*$8S,l SSSJ001-S9SJ $95,001 -SI Over SI t II For AUCises Table 4>3 Mean Tinal Net Property Tax by It Metro and Noo-metro Regi :• iTi»le Group i •, ► ^ Fuial Net Property T Metro Non-metro Metro Non-metni 529 648 697 748 868 946 1,120 1,085 1,194 2,059 $ 85 201 321 384 385 426 493 587 520 650 703 981 10^%* 3^ Z63 Z14 1.77 .1.52 1.46 135 1.41 131 130 139 431%^ 1.93 1j64 130 0.96 037 033 036 036 a72 039 032 $721 $339 311%134% • Af Holed ia Table 2-3, this tiaiinic is voUiile for the lowest mrmw fnwp beniMSf the tfeaoiaiiiaior for iadMdml latcqNcied wkli caotioa. kibi Rfstarch Oepartntnt Ntnaesota Hoatt of Riprtstntatlm i I I .a ;■» f.: it ft' 1 i , ►' - :fc|’X KINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL 01STRICT NO. 278 HELD ON JANUARY 14, 1991 JAN 3 0 1991 The regular meeting of the School Board of Orono Independent School District No. 278 was held on Monday, January 14, 1991. Present: Dave NcKown Don Anderson Lucie Taylor James Franklin Peg Swanson Thomas Mich William Fenholt Board member John Maresh arrived while the meeting was in progress. UPON NOTION by Lucie Taylor, seconded by Jim Franklin, the consent agenda was approved as follows: • approved the minutes of the December 10, 1990 regular meeting; - approved the request of Francis Engstrom, elementary teacher, for a two year leave of absence commencing with the 1990>91 school year; • approved the following coaches for winter sports: Brian Bergstrom, assistant basketball coach - boys; Marc Nelson, assistant basketball coach • girls; Daun Henning, assistant basketball coach - girls; Bob Komma, assistant gymnastics coach; Kelly Sahughnessy, head wrestling coach; William Ostvig, assistant wrestling coach; Todd Meyer, assistant wrestling coach; Joe Dalman, assistant ski coach; - designated the Assistant Superintendent as the administrator to review all collateral obtained from financial Institutions to cover investments and bank deposits; - adopted the Treasurer's Reports for July, August and September, 1990; • approved the bills as covered by vouchers 068286 through 068569 and building construction bills as covered by vouchers 1183 through 1218. Notion carried. Board member Maresh absent. Dr. Nich extended best wishes for the new year and reported that postings have been sent for the administrative positions of Business Manager/Assistant to the Superintendent and Director of Community Education and applications will be accepted until March 1, 1991; that Mrs. Eleanor Winston has agreed to chair the Scholarship Fund; that NSBA Convention registrations should be In the District Office by January 22, 1991; that the Technology Committee, chaired by Lucie Taylor, has a number of site vlslts/ineetlngs planned as they prepare to establish a technology blueprint for future years In our schools; that ANSO will hold a legislative breakfast on January 24, 1991 which will Include AMSD Board members, ANSO Technical Committee and area le9ls1ators; that Board members will be receiving an Invitation from OEA to a breakfast meeting with area legislators on January 26; that he was distributing a report from the Task Force on Education Organization; that on March 2, 1991, the high school will host the regional spelling bee; that he had met with the OEA Executive Committee for the purpose of hearing their concerns/1ssues; that he wanted to express appreciation d i*! i'p'v. lip' i;" wv' i^'m 4 if m :l;^*> - '■■ • T .V- • ■ liill- to the Orono Police Department and the Long Lai ^ • :eer Fire Department for their work/efforts during the bomb threat at the . school on January 7 and also acknowledged the leadership at the high school, faculty and staff for their efforts that day; that Bob Scheuble has been hired as a consultant to work with administration In updating the policies of the district; that on January 2S the faculty/staff recognition luncheon will be held to honor twenty>f1ve year employees. Don Anderson reported that the Maple Lions has granted money which will provide for the continuation of a self-esteem program at the Orono Primary School. Don Anderson reported that he has attended a number of athletic events during December and January and he wanted the Board to know that he has been very Impressed with Orono*s students and the effort they put forth In their Indivi­ dual sports. Dr. Mich reported to the Board that the tentative date for occupancy of the classroom portion of the new facility Is January 24 and that the pool should be ready for use by the end of February. Dr. Mich provided the Board with backgrounc* Information on the concept of out­ come based education stating that although there are positive points to this concept such as articulation/coordination of the curriculum with more accoun­ tability for the curriculum as well as greater variety/flexibility In the currl- cultfi, evaluation needs to be done within the arena of success that the present system entails. Dr. Mich stated that It Is anticipated that action by the State Board of Education will mandate not only a program of outcome based education but new graduation requirements. He distributed a draft of proposed graduation outcomes prepared by the State Department of Education, toard members asked questions for clarification/information purposes and Dr. Mich assured them that there will be updates as these concepts progress. UPON NOTION by Jim Franklin, seconded by Lucie Taylor, the Board of Education approved the registration/course guide as presented Including the following recommended changes: 1 IV' ;■ ■’' Mp- te-- m jii.v .1 r -r'' _.i ‘^ife :'’y'^ 1*' - fim f*.- Approved by the Orono Boerd of Education - January 14,1991Additional Course! - Orono High School - 1991-92 Music “ISm siMsitr tlfctive World of Music II “Tliit sciiesUr oTcctlve This Is •» effort to offer a non-perfonsance course open to all students. Forelpn Language Japanese H We art currently offering Japanese I sequence. This Is a continuation of the Hcae economics Deoartaent renaaed by State Departaent of Education to Personal and tally Life Sciences. The new eaphasis will require soae alteration IoSTiPsting courses. Suslness Business Sealnar 1 and 2 the requlrawnt which cannot be renewed for 1991-92. Study Skills A course In Study Skills Is recoaaended to be added to the currlcuta. This would be a scaester elective course and not placed In any depart- aent. It Is intended for freshaan and sophoaores. ^.1^. -li . V ■ ■ .i yIV 1I Dr. Greenfield provided Informatlon/ansMered Questions from the Board regarding the proposed changes In the progr«n of studies at the high school. Motion carried unanimously. The Board viewed a videotape which provided Information regarding the advantages of a swimming pool cover. Bill Fenholt provided the Board with some disadvan­ tages of using a pool cover and Informed them that ventllatlon/dehumidfying equipment Is being Installed In the pool area which will result In energy savings. This Item will be reviewed/studied after a year or so when energy costs In the pool area have been established. Steve Fedle* Athletic Director, reported to the Board on the athletic program activities this year Including such areas as: participation comparison figures, sportsmanship ratings, facility remodeling. Injury report prepared by Missy Strauch (trainer for the district), major events held at Orono during this school year, etc. Mr. Fedle stat^ that guidelines are being developed for recognition of student/athletes, that research Is being conducted on ticket prices, and that the handbook for coaches and the evaluation Instruments for coaches are presently being reviewed/studied. UPON MOTION by Jim Franklin, seconded by Lucie Taylor, the meeting was adjourned. Carried unanimously. Approved: Luclenne J. Baylor/ tier ;own. Chairman r NEWSLETTER , t ‘ N!U N ■t u )1 ■ )|‘, ’Ml! ' M' ' ORONO SCHCX)L BOARD David McKown. Chairman 479-1692 Don Anderson. Vice Chairman Jim Franklin. TreajiUfrr Lucie Ta>li»r. Clerk John Maresh. Director Peg Sv^anson. Director 479-1810 479-2130 4-*3-Il89 475-3197 473-0603 SSUt NO h ___IStmMdlao^omecarriailufnol^^ 1991. This change wat not the result of educational innovation or careful study by a curriculum committee. Rather, the change was the direct result of the sobering armounoennenl on January 16 that the United States and its coalition partners had attacked Iraq. As with world emergencies or events of national consequence in decades past, newspapers signal the curricular additions. The batmer headline for the January 17 Star Tribune was sued net and chilling: "War Begins." The supporting curricular content was seemingly instantaneous and continuous by means of radio and television reporting. While war in the Persian Gulf was foreshadowed for over five months, its reality was startlirrg. Irrstantly many of us devdoped a rvorfcitrg kirowledge erf the geography of the Middle East and a sense of wonder and amazement over the technology of our weaponry. Many of us also felt the disquielit^ and somber emotions which acknowledge the seriousness of war. On January 17 our students arrived at school having the experience of hours of television reports, family conversations, and conversatiorts with peera. The School District's challenge was artd b to find and use appropriate means for students to relate to the war. Forhi^schod ntenarul wonrenthereisa need for access to information, opportunities for discussion, and a realization that viewpoints vary. For the youngest students our attention is to how they understaiKl what they see and hear about the %var. A siiiall child may be frighterted by news reports not having an understanding of distance 'from die war zone. In other %eords ive must respond to our student's needs appropr iately, along the vast continuum of maturity that is a school ^stertr. We need also to respond individually as we flttd this student with a brother or cousin in Saudi Arabia, artother student with a father or mother in the cont next column 1 reserves, or yet another with a boyfriend or girlfriend who has enlisted in the Army. These responses, absolutely necessary in the tace of our country at war and our concern and support for our servicemen and women, are offered against the backdrop of the daily schedule of teaching and learning. In fact the efforts to deal with the ideas, concerns and maybe even fears of our students sen'e to enhance the daily work of learning. I have been reminded several times in the past days that while children especially young children, are unlike adults in their thinking, they are like adults in their feelings. Simply because young people may not have the facility to articulate their thoughts about the war. doesn't mean they don't have strong feelings. Again, the challenge for parents, teachers and for all of us is to deal with the ideas and issues of war and with the emotions. May this challenge exist for only a brief time. Thomas B. Mich, Ph.D. Superintendent mid COintur Fun Saburdav. Fubruarv 2, l99l 1:00 - pm middia School Fun ft^r oil t': T.k^- fe:--'■#, f > ,.r r'- re '■4m C "('A'''pi pi. ■• '■ V'''' '■' Guidance at a Glance fj^ncQjiilQ^JQgS^^QtSSft 8A*R March 16,1991 Registration Deadline 2/8/91 ACT; April 13,1991 Registration Deadline 3/15/91 In addition to the refular registration deadlines for the listed tests, there are late registration deadlines. An extra fee it involved and no guarantee of getting your requested test center. The practice is not encouraged except in an emergen^. See your counselor or consult the registration padtett for farther information. Financial Aid Forms Seniors and their parents are reminded to file either the FFS (Family Financial Statement) or FAF (Financial Aid Form) if they wish to be considered for financial aid. Aid may come firom a variety of sources such as federal agencies, state agencies, the colleges or schools themselves, and private corporations and organisations. The one constant is that they all want to see one of the above mentioned forms. Application packets are avaUshle in the guidance office. February College Representatives Feb. 3 St. Mary's of Mn. at Bloomington Marriott 1:00pm Feb. 4 University of Minnesota * Morris 1:00pm Scholarship Opportunities The guidance office continues to receive a wide variety of private sector, college, and public scholarship appUeations. We encourage seniors to check the file we have and to apply fbr those they qualify for. Career Education Night The six schools of the Western Suburbs have coordinated a Career Education Ni^t to be held on Mondivi Mardi 4,1991, at WSiysata High School. The program for the evening is diversified to a ccomai^te the many interests ^ both students and a^td. The presenters are of the h^est caliber and will dteuas not o^ career opportunities, but also the paths that lead to thMO opportunities. It is our goal to have all students and adults in transitieo avail themselvos of this excellent information. School CbuBB^n 473-6472 CALL Wrra TOUR QUESTIONS Big. iFoyieko • an stodanta with last names MU Bbt Waabotton • an atodanta with last LZ Registration for High School Classes 1991-1992 The registiition process at the school will be simitar to the revamped procedures instituted last year. We will, however, be starting earlier. Ninth, tenth, and eleventh graders will register during the month of February and eighth graders will be registered in early March. We %vill also be using our new homeroom system with the ninth and tenth grade classes to provide more comprehensive and uniform pre-registration guidance and counseling. Classes of Interest to High School Parents and Students Orono Community Education has a class scheduled to begin Thursday, February 21 on Creative Strategies for College Financing. This is a two week class that will cover all aspects of financing a college education. The course is taught by a Certified Financial Planner/Registered Investment Advisory and Bank Student Loan Officer. Call the Community Education Office at 473-4879 for registration information on this class. To assist students in preparing for the ACT and SAT college entrance exams. Advantage Education Programs will offer two courses this winter. Classes will begin at Orono during the week of February 23. Students who participate in the program may repeat the course for NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE in future offerings. For further information on these ACT and SAT classes, call Advantage Educational Programs at 827-9254. Parents of 9th & 10th Graders Are you concerned with your child's study habits? High School Survival may be the answer! A voluntary course will be offered second semester to help >our child become a better learner. *^e focus will be on developing study skills, including time management, note taking, test taking, and memory devices. Look for a letter with further explanation after January 1. If you have any questions once you receive your letter, contact Sandy Clark or Susan Heidt at the high school 473-5472. rri*.I* > ■h i- t-p'" i ► t ^ Vi. X ■V’ b i, w t j.r.I- ■«'... pv:' tF r v^ *• f rr ■! r." ■ Summer Soccer An organisational mooting and player registration for the aummor traveling league will be held on Saturday, February 23, 1991 at 10:00 a.m. in the Orono High Sdiool lundiroom. AH interested players and parents should plan to attend. Details of the program will be ftamished and all questions answered at that time. The registrations submitted will in large measure help to detennine the number of teams which can be fielded for the summer program. So please encourage anyone who would be interested in playing summer soccer againat other toams in the suburban area to attend the MOMS Are you looking for an outing to chase away the winter blahs? Join us on Friday, February 15 for some lively conversation, coffee and treats. "MOMS" (Meet Orono Moms) invites all Orono mothers to participate in this fun group. Gatherings are held at TVinity Lutheran Church from 1:00 - 3:00 p»Tri« MOMS will not meet in March but look for our April Date in the April newsletter. New ofRears for the 1991 season have been elected and the Board has been reorganized to better serve the participants in the program. It is the intention of the Board to provide a quality soccer esperience for all interested players from ages 8 to 18. The purpose of the club is to: help all participants develop a positive Mlf image, teach motivation and soccer skills, provide competition at the highest appropriate level, and give all players an equal opportunity to play and have fun. Questiens or 1^ registrations can be directed to these Bottfd mraibtrii lindy fr John Purdy 471 9712 Cole Graham 473-7252 Lowell Seashore 479-2859 Sue M^^y 471-8333 Mary Alihouse 473-0953 Sue Zietlow A 473-5263 Winter Band Concert The three Orono Middle School Bands will perform at their twenty-third Winter Concert on Thursday, February 21, 7:30 p.m., in the high school auditorium. Admission is $2 for adults and $1 for students. You and your guests are cordially invited to attend the performance and a reception on the mezzanine immediately following the concert. The program features a variety of outstanding Concert Band repertoire. We are looking forward to seeing you at the performance. Glen Johnson Meeting Notice Plans for the all-night party for graduating seniors are well underway. The next meeting of the parents planning the party is at 7:30 p.m. on March 11 in the Hi|dt School Cafeteria. Anyone interested in helping with the party should contact Jean Dettloff, 473-3525. , Cy- • >! ^ . -V.*' . .> e • 'e - A , ■ -qf . ., ♦ ' * ;v.: .. . .s.- . V . ••*.: • ■ Career Camivah A Carousel of Choices FUth Animal Caraar Ezploratiott Ni|^t BfarchdyUWl Wasrsata Higli Selkool; Program: Baglslimiklk PIzga and Pop Careei -.'.f- « 1 ) I 1, 7:45pm Career Seaaion 2» 8:90pm Career Session 3 '■U'' V.v'i' ^ ‘V:'v • :. ^ ^ ' CoHlppilloi^ Minnetonka, Orono, St. Louis 1 Connaeioie and Intennediate District 2i -. . Career Bdncatloa Services K*12 y ■-s'- 'Pr •" I : I “ -.1^ • isc^bSbaniiifeiciuSLiSi r f ■I I r I"I:: \ < f I < I I ',/ ( illI'ffii m m Adopted the final pn^rty tax levy for 1990. Authorixed the creation of the position of Director of Community Relations and authorized the appointment of Ms. Ibni Borland to that position effective July 1,1991. Approved the Blo^ Grant application. Approved the ECFE winter course offerings as requested. Authorized the issuance of General Obligation Tax Anticipation Certificates. Accepted the audit as submitted by Don Egnell of Proehling, Anderson, Plowman and Egnell, Ltd. Senior Community Services Seeks Area Adults To Visit Homebound Elderly Senior Community Services is an agency sendng senior citizens In several suburban communities. We are currently seeking volunteers to visit older adults in the western suburbs. These are homebound older adUlts who are lonely, depressed, or isolated. Some of them are experiencing loss or change in their Ives which can be very difficult to handle alone. Many times no one is even aware that they are In need of help. If you enjoy listening, talking, giving encouragement and becoming a friend, this program could be just for you. A few hours of your time a month can be a wonderful inspiration to someone who needs a Bnk with the outside world. If you would be wilHng to give this type of support to someone in your area, please call Libby Hansen at Senior Communiry Sendees 933-9311. 2/2 Mid Winter FSm Pest at MS.....................1:00pm 2/4 Early Childhood Health A Development ft,,. f*f**9*"a at Orono Primary ^11 School Board Meeting at MS...................7:00pm 2/12 Lincoln's Birthday mi? 5*?*‘*^M Boosters Mtg. HS...................7:30pm2/14 Valentines Day 2/18 President's Day NO SCHOOL 2/22 Washington's Birthday 2/25 School Board Meeting at MS...................7:00pm 2/28 Orono Education Fund Lecture Series.....7:00Dm 2/2 Mid Winter Fun Fest at MS.....................1:00pm 2/12 SE A OPS Feb. BD Party 2/18 Presictent's Day NO SCHOOL 2/25 Musician in Residence all week at SE ^PTA Family Fun Night at Cheepskate....6:00pm Middle School A<»tivitie« 2/14 6th Grade Career Day 7th Grade Career Fair 2/18 President's Day NO SCHOOL 2/19 MS PAC Mtg in FDR...............................7 30pm 2/21 MS Band Concert in Aud..........................7:30pm 2/26 8th Grade Parents Night - HS.................7.30pm High Sehool Activitie* 2/1 Boys Basketball - St Bernard's................7:30pm 2/2 Hockey. Blake.........................................7:30pm 2/5 Hockey. Breck.........................................7:30pm Gymnastics * Delano ...............................6:45pm Boys Basketball. Blake...........................7:30pm Girls Basketball atS. St Paul.................7:30pm Boys Basketball at DeLaSalle.................7:30pm Wrestling. Mpis. Lutheran.....................6:30pm G)rmnastics - Mound ...............................6:15pm Girls Basketball. Tri Metro .....................7:30pm Hockey at Mound .....................................7:30pm Wrestling Conference at Mound 2/11 Math Team at Brooklyn Center...............4 00pm Boys Basketball. Concordia ....................7:30pm 2/12 Hockey. St ^^ony ...............................7:30pm Girls Basketball. TVi Metro .....................7:30pm 2/14 Gsrmnastics at Mound .............................6* 15pm Boys Basketball. Tri Metro 2/15 Girls Basketball - TH Metro .....................7:30pm Wrestling * 6AA Individual 2/16 Hockey at St Bernard's...........................7:30pm 2/18 President s Birthday NO SCHOOL 2/19 Sno Daze Week at High School 2.21 Girls Basketball District Wrestling • TWam 6AA 2/7 2/8 2/9 2/22 Gymnastiet Region 5A Boys Basketball • Tri Metro 2/25 High School Winter Band Concert Aud.....7:30pm 2/28 Boys Basketball District 17A at Monticello Wrestling • State ^ f iV y. ATIONS FOR TEACHER OF THE YEAR The Orono Education Association will be sponsoring the Teacher of the Year search in coi^unction with MEA. The OEA Communications Council is hoping all parents, district patrons, former and present students, administrators, school board members, and fellow teachers will give some consideration to nominating a teacher who might represent all Orono Teachers as an exemplary teacher in our district , * Tlie criteria need for jadging are the following PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES COMMUNITY ACTTVITIES STUDENT RAPPORT DEMONSTRATED LEADERSHIP CREDENTIALS AWARDS AND HONORS PUBLICATIONS OR ARTICLES HOBBIES AND INTERESTS MISCELLANEOUS The candidates do not have to meet all criteria; you might show in what ways you have seen your nominee exhibit some representative criteria. Judging will be done by a panel which will include: last year's Teach of the Year, a teacher, a senior, two parents, a school board member, a community member, and an administrator. If you have any questions, please contact these Communications Council committee members. D14NNE HIGGINS SALLY ERICKSON DAVESOHN KATHY POMMERENING NANCY JOHNSON BOB DOETSCH JEFF BROWN, OEA PRESIDENT ANYONE MAY MAKE AN 11 !^ATION USING THE FOLLOWING FORM IWISHTON ATE.AS A CANDIDATE FOR ORONO TEACHER OF THE YEAR. THIS CANDIDATE MEETS THE CRITERIA IN THE FOLLOWING WAYS: t Due Wedneeday, February 20,1991. Return to Dianne Higgins, (Oroi Bob Doetach, (SrJiumann Elementary) High) or Nbodnator..Phone. t. k. I- i' ' ♦ ' 'I-fU' 5.'. f* . r ' ■ Pi * r. ft r.-: 0. 'fi>r< i. :t:? f . V ■'i' tv; i.i- ih SPA Update spartan Parent Ataodation will have their February meetinc on Friday, Februaiy 8th at 8:20 a.ni. in the teacher'a lundi room of the hi^ school cafeteria. Bring your ideas and st^estions for student/parent involvement We are anxious for parent input and are hoping for a good turn-out. High School Athletic Report On Mondagr, January 14, Steve Fedie, Athletic Dirrctor, made a presentation to the Board of Education. He reported on the fall and winter participation which is up from the previous two years. In the fall almost one half of the students were involved in sports. Mr. Fedie also reported that: all of the fall sports received "very high" or "high" sportsmanship ratings from other schools; girls soccer and football had conference championships; and that girls basketball and gymnastics are currently ranked in the top five in dass "A" in the state. Some of the upeoming events to be held at Orono are the IVi'Metro Wrestling Tournament on February 9, District 17A Track Meet on May 23, Section Tennis Tournament on May 28-29 and the District 17A Baskettmll games this winter. listed below are the athletes that were chosen "All- Conference” this past fall. Volleyball: Crosscountry: Girls Tsnnis: Girls Soccer Mdsaie Gustafson MVP Misty Dettloir Jodi Sohn HM Tracy Johnson HM Ibdd Whitcis MVP BrieWhiteic Kalis Volkart Kyto Swenson MVP Um Underdahl UsIsSonknp Katrina Wy^ki ViddRoshl HM Style Swenson HM Kelly Shaw HM jm Dudley HM 11MVP Hillstrom Linnea Sivets TIaaaPnfiMr Vbnesea Smith PunlnAai PamCriago Mindy Anderson HM HM HM Cont. next column Boys Soccer Andy Gilbertson Pete Swanson Erik Peterson Dave Evans MVP HM HM Football: Pat Lacy John Nash Marie Christiansen Steve Tliielbar 'Dnoy Schmidt Chris Hawkinson Tom Nash Mike Keller Bryan Swenson Brian Cox MVP HM HM HM HM fe:. Lifeguards & Swimming instructors Needed Orono Community Education is taking applications for lifeguards and swimming instructors. Call the Community Education office at dTS-dSys or stop in to pick up an application. Basketball News The next Basketball Boosters Meeting will be held Wednesday, February 13 at 7:30p.m. in room 108 of Orono High School. Orono Spartan Classic Basketball Tourney Sat & Sun., March 2 & 3 Orono High School and Orono AHddle School 5th Grade Boys 6th Grade Boys 6th Grade Gi^ INEV8LETTEI1 - - -I f . Non-ProMO^ US. POSTAGE nuo LaneUM.MN PERMtTNO. 12 Cl tv-ftf Cryst.-il Ba>. , nji 35323 ET MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JANUARY 22, 1991 ATTENDANCE 7:00 P.M. The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Planning Commission Chair Charlie Kelley and Planning Commission Members Maureen Bellows, Ed Cohen, Ji;n Hanson, Candace Rowlette and Sara Moos. The following represented the City Staff: Building and Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and City Recorder Scheffler, Council Representative Mayor Paterson was present, as was CounciImember Callahan. tl612 CHRISTOPHER DALE • GERI LEE PAULSON 4085 • 4105 WATERTONN ROAD SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT Mr. Jack Vigoren, Attorney, was present applicants. on behalf of the Kelley opened the Public Hearing at 7:00 p.m. and asked Mabusth to briefly explain tha application. Mabusth revie^/ad her memo dated January 10, 1991 and displayed a survey showing the location of the driveway that serves the applicants' residence. She noted that the driveway is located on the property owned by the neighbor to the west. She stated that this subdivision involves a lot line rearrangement and the creation of a private easement over the driveway area. There were no public comments and Kelley closed the Public Hearing at 7:02 p.m. It was moved by Hanson, seconded by Moos, to recommend approval of a Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement, and creation of a driveway access Easement, requiring a lot width Variance. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-O. Motion carried. #1615 GARY MR08 S KENNETH HOPKINS 59 PERNDALE GREEN PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION Kenneth Hopkins and Gary Mroz were present. At 7:30 p.m. Kelley opened the Public Hearing. Mabusth briefly reviewed the information contained in her January 15, 1991 memo. She stated that she had discussed this subdivision with the City of Wayzata. She said, "If Lot 1 is developed using rural standards, the septic test site would push the building site over the Orono boundary and into the City of Nayzata Kelley asked if having a lot located half in Orono, h ' f in Wayzata, would create any problems. - 1 - -- ?-r r'.' : :• • ::-k ■f^2 'i.'- ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 22, 1991 ZONING FILE «1615-MROZ/HOPKINS CONTINUED Mabusth replied, "City Staff has had preliminary discussions with the City of Way<;ata. The City of Orono would issue the building permits for the houses. There is an existing agreement pertaining to water and sewer charges and how the unit charges are to be paid." Ms. Gretchen Ventura, 45 Ferndale Green, asked if there were any other homes on Ferndale Green that were located partially in Orono and partially in Wayzata. Mabusth replied, "All of the houses on Ferndale Green are totally within the bounds or Orono." Kelley stated that the applicants will only require a Variance to cross the wetlands. He asked Mabusth to comment on the City's position regarding municipal water and sewer to Lot 1. Mabusth stated that she concurred with the City Engineer's opinion. She said, "The City of Wayzata has asked that the City of Orono take all appropriate public easements over Outlot A if there is municipal sewer and water to Lot 1. Sewer and water is available and the applicants are asking to develop this property based on rural standards. I believe that it is an efficient method of development to provide Lot 1 with sewer. The MUSA line will be re->defined at a later date with a Comprehensive Plan amendment." Mr. Bill Mueller, 55 Ferndale Green, asked whose responsibility it will be to maintain the outlot. He stated that people have been using that area for a dumping ground and that he would like to see it cleaned up and maintained. Nr. Hopkins stated that the two lots will have an undivided interest of the outlot and it will be the property owners' responsibility to maintain it. Mabusth advised Mr. Mueller that because part of that area is wetland, the property owners will have limitations as to what they can do. Nr. Mueller indicated that he did not like the fact that the property owners could maintain the rest of the outlot in any manner they choose. He said, "They could just let it all grow back to scrub. Doesn't the City have any regulations that would require the area to be cut and maintained as yard area?" Kelley stated that the City does not have such regulations. Mabusth added, "The property in this subdivision is located in the Rural Zoning District and there are different standards than those for Mr. Mueller's property. There are limitations - 2 - w r ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 22, 1991 ZONING FILE il615-MROZ/HOPKINS CONTINUED restricting how high grass and weeds can grow. If the City receives complaints about a particular property, the property owner must then cut the grass to comply with the regulations." Kelley asked for further public comments. There were none, and the Public Hearing was closed at 7:45 p.m. Bellows asked Mabusth to elaborate on the information pertaining to the Wayzata country Club maintaining a northerly portion of Lot 2. Mabusth replied, "The Golf Course currently maintains that portion of the property." She depicted on the sketch the location of the area in question. Mabusth said, "The area is not part of the golf course itself, it is just an area that VJayzata Country Club maintains, probably for the benefit of the neighboring property owners. Staff cautioned the applicants that they cannot grant easements that will subtract from the required two acre contiguous land." Bellows stated that maintaining the two acre requirement was her concern. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Hanson, to recommend approval of a Preliminary Subdivision for Gary Mroz and Ken Hopkins. Rowlette asked whether the motion needed to include any reference to municipal sewer. Cohen stated that he was not going to include any language pertaining to sewer. Motion, Ayes-5, Nay-0. Motion carried. «1616 GARY MROZ t KENNETH HOPKINS 59 PBRNDALE GREEN CONDITIOHAL USE PERMIT Kelley opened the Public Hearing at 7:50 p.m. He stated that the Planning Commission has made previous recommendations to approve crossing through designated wetlands. Hanson asked Mabusth to sketch the drainage pattern. .4abu8th showed where drainage flows as it leaves the property. She said, "The surveyor has submitted a revised plan responding to the City's requirements to exclude the drainageways from the dry buildable, while maintaining the two acre minimum." Kelley stated that the Wayzata Golf Course is currently maintaining the draintile. He asked what can be done to assure that maintenance continues and water does not backup to Ferndale Green. Mabusth stated that the culvert will continue to function and drain runoff. She also stated that the City will take - 3 - J 1J'**,'-:.' 1-VI' ■ ^Ll"'■ •li./- Lr'"f 3l\' MVV- If h OROHO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 22, 1991 SOmilG PILE #1616-MROZ/HOPKINS CONTINUED •a8€ncnts over the drainageways and underground draintile. Mr. Mueller expressed concern about future costs he may incur if water'^ backs onto his property as a result of the road construction. Mr. Frank Ventura stated that his property was at a lower elevation than Mr. Mueller's and that he too was concerned about possible future drainage problems. Kelley stai sd that the purpose of the easements is to ar-jvide a means for the City to maintain the drainageways in the event the property owners do not. He said, "The City would clean out and repair the draintile and assess the cost back to the responsible property owners.** There were no additional comments from the public and Kelley closed the Public Hearing at 7:54 p.m. It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Cohen, to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit and Variance to cross a wetland based on Staff findings A through E and conditions 1, 2, and 3. Motion, Ayes-6. Nays-0. Motion carried. «IS70 CHUCK DONNEY 2i€5 CASCO POINT ROAD COHDITXOIIAL USER PERMIT COMTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Cohen, to table this item to allow Mr. Downey or his representative to be present for discussion. Motion, Ayes-6, Nays-0. Motion carried. #1600 RICK'S SOPER VALO 3333 SBORBLIME DRIVE VARXAIICS/CQHNBRCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW CONTIIRIATION OF PUBLIC HEARING Nr. Rick Bloomquist and Lyle Fuller were present. KfXley reopened the Public Hearing at 7:03 p.m. (Bellows and Cohan arrived at this time.) Mr. Fuller stated that he had sent the City a position paper addressing each issue raised by the Planning Commission at their November 19, 1990 mseting. He suggested that the Planning Costtsission ask any questions they may have regarding that information. He added, “I believe we have a very viable project for the Navarre Business Area. Rick Bloomquist needs the 0ppoj;(uiiity to expand his business in the location proposed in to continue to compete with the market.'* Cohen stated that his opinion, from reading the information - 4 - 1=. M-- !& mi.imi &• ■■ ■ ■K ■|H'r- tl-v tiy r. Ir’i 'mi: ►■-■■■■'P'*'It:;: i-i'' p:3t n' OROMO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 22, 1991 ZONING PILE #1600-RICK*S SUPER VALUE CONTINUED provided, is that Mr. Bloomquist h\s explored every possible alternative. He asked Mabusth if the City had any further concerns which have not been addressed. Mabusth stated that clearly the City's utility Easement, 30 feet in width, was the key factor in locating the expansion. She said, "The applicant could meet the required setbacks if it were not for this Easement. Tne City also faced that same hardship when a side setback Variance was granted in 1976 when the property was first developed." Kelley suggested discussing the Vacation of Kelly Avenue. He stated that had driven through that area and, in his opinion, Kelly Avenue should not be closed off. The Planning Commission concurred with Kelley. Mr. Fuller stated that he examined the traffic flow, etc. should not be closed. and Mr. B.’.ooraquist had also on Kelly and agresd that it Kelley referred to Mr. Fuller's earlier comments about the need for Mr. Bloomquist to expand. He asked Mr. Bloomquist if there was a point at which he would feel he could expand no further, or if*he would propose another expansion in the future. Mr. Bloomquist stated that ho had attended a meeting pertaining to a possible redevelopment of the entir» Navarre business area. He said, "I am asking to do this small expansion now to address my growth neoir. At the time the City would be considering another expansion request of mine, I believe it would be appropriate to address the issue of Vacating Kelly Avenue and extending the shopping center." Mr. Fuller added, "At approximately the same time the Navarre Redevelopment was being considered, we had been contacted by a party interested in purcnasing the Keaveny property and working with us to construct a new shopping center. Economically, I believe that is several years away." Kelley said, "In other words, you believe that you could not expand the building again without Vacating Kelly Avenue." Mr. Bloomquist said, "That is correct Mabusth referred to the City Engineer's report and his opinion pertaining to the accesses to the property. Mr. Fuller stated that he took exception to the City Engineer's recommendation to relocate the two accesses. He said, "When the County improved the intersection of County Roads 15 and - 5 - i I IN ■ ne wm I i■^ #«>.. ^i I fh. f I r^:'.r' i: 1.. I/.; r i' ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 22, 1991 ZONING FILE #1600-RICK*S SUPER VALUE CONTINUED 19, we widened the accesses in accordance with the County’s recommendations. The City Engineer is proposing to move the access off of County Road 19 closer to the south lot line. Due to topography arid the bank access, that is not feasible. I believe that if the County had wanted the access there, they would have requested it. I do not believe that relocating the County Road 15 access to Kelly Avenue will work because of elevation problems. A person coming off of County Road 15 would drop down on Kelly and then need to make a left-hand, bias turn up into the parking area. Safety standards will not permit this. I am surprised that the City Engines ecommended this." Mabusth asked Mr. Fuller to e>.. the need to relocate the ramp. Mr. Fuller stated that the decision to relocate the ramp was based on cost and engineering issues. Kelley noted that the applicant was prop ^ ig to plant shrubs and other vegetation for screening to south. He stated that the plantings should be maintained ar.d replaced if necessary. Mabusth suggested that the applicants submit a planting schedule, giving consideration to plantings along the west side, as well as replacing plantings that may be removed when the retention pond is installed. Bellows asked whether any lighting or signage changes are proposed. Mr. Bloomquist replied, "Other than building lights for security reasons, there will be no other additions or changes." There were no public comments and Kalley closed the Public Hearing at 7:20 p.m. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Rowlette, to recommend approval of the side street setback Variance and parking stall Variance, subject to conditions 2, 3, and 4, as proposed in Mabusth*8 memo dated January 17, 1991. Motion, Ayes-4, Bellows, Hanson, Nay. Motion carried. Bellows indicated that the responses by the applicant did not fully address the Pis ining Commission’s concerns and there were no changes to the proposal, only rationalizations. Hanson stated that he objectad because there was no change made to the proposal and he felt there were alternatives. - 6 - A •f. tv I' b h. I f t ;<■ ■f >bf;*' I f t' OROMO PLAMMING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 22, 1991 #1604 CLAIR ROOD 2215 RBNNOOD WAY CONDITIONAL OSE PERMIT CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING Mr. Rood was present, as was Mrs. Lorraine Moss, a neighbor interested in this application. Kelley re-opened the Public Hearing at 8:15 p.m. and asked Gaffron to briefly review Mr. Rood's proposal. Gaffron stated that Mr. Rood had revised his proposal since the November 19, 1990 Planning Commission meeting. He said, "Mr. Rood is now proposing to have the pond only five feet in depth, rather than 12 feet. The boundaries of the pond have not changed, but the slopes are now shown at a four to one ratio, as opposed to one to one. Mr. Rood is still requesting approval to convert approximately one-third of the wetlands into pond area. He is also proposing to fill aid excavate portions of the wetland." Gaffron showed the Planning Commission where the spoils would be deposited and stated that it would be necessary for the applicant to provide silt fencing and erosion control measures. ’ He reviewed the additional issues involved with this application as noted in his January 17, 1991 memo. Cohen asked if the monuments were still an issue. Gaffron replied, "The monuments may be a separate issue. There is an undeveloped public right-of-way to the rear and side of the property. Is this property considered a through lot, or a corner lot? Would the pillars be considered as a fence or accessory structure? If the pillars are considered to be a fence abutting a right-of-way, should they be more than 3.5 feet high? If they are an accessory structure, should they meet a 10 foot setback, if they can exist at all in a side yard or rear yard without a Conditional Use Permit. There are many issues." Rowlette asked whether Mr. Rood had a specific reason, other than aesthetics, for altering the wetland. Gaffron stated that the applicant's major intent is to clean up the wetlands which have been used as a dumping ground for years. He said, "Mr. Rood also wants to aesthetically improve the appearance of the wetland in addition to c;;dating some different characteristics for wildlife." Mr. Rood stated that he has not seen a great deal of wildlife in the wetland. He said, "I thought if I provided additional area of open water, it may enhance the wildlife. I would like to install some wood duck houses and I understand that the ducks must land in water. I' is not my intention to destroy the wildlife." - 7 - ■i J Ilt'i*' .0'“' ■Mmtel. mM- 'r - lu p!i.. mm:fte;v,v fefiiii-■■■ r.^i; OROMO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 22» 1991ZONING FILE I1604-ROOD CONTINUED Hanaon stated that whatever existing wildlife is in the wetland may be disturbed, but that other wildlife would be attracted to the area once the alterations have been made* Ha said, "In that sense, that issue is subjective. In my opinion, cleaning up the wetland is the more significant issue and enables me to view this favorably." Mrs. Moss stated that she had walked around the wetland just after the November Planning Commission meeting. She said, "We •eared up a deer and there are quite a few geese, mallards and other critters there in the spring. All this digging is going to disturb them." She asked Mr. Rood what he intends to do with the rushes and stated that is where the ducks and geese hide. Mr. Rood stated that most of the rushes would remain just as they are. Mrs. Moss stated that Mr. Rood had already removed quite a bit of the rushes and was concerned about placing the spoils on a glassy area. She preferred to have the wetland left as it is and stated that several of her neighbors share her views. Kelley asked if there were any other comments from the public. There were none, and Kelley closed the Public Hearing at 8t25 p.m. He stated that it is difficult to consider how the alterations will look in the summer. He questioned whether it oiay appropriate to table this matter until summer. Rowlette stated thai she did not favor altering the wetland to this degree* She said, "If 1 is necessary to clean up the area, that is one thing. I do not agree with excavating, filling and changing the nature of the wetland." Moos stated that sne had no objscti^jns to Mr. Rood's pond proposal. Bellows concurred with Moos. She said, "I do not see any problem with altering the wetland in this manner.” Kelley asked the Planning Commissioners to give their opinions about depositing the spoils on-site. He said, "I have no idea how everything will look when the project is completed." Rowlette said, "I antiseptic looking." am concerned that it will be very Bellows suggested, given the delicate nature of this land, that Mr. Rood submit a landscape plan showing plantings, etc. She said, "That may provide us with a means of assuring the neighbors that the wetland will be left as natural as possible, while accommodating a reasonable request from the homeowner." - 8 - r- :V. ■i ■M C;ORONO PLANNING COMNISSION MEETING JANUARY 22, 1991 ■> A r.. I . p* ■ rI lit'' ■ L'i" ■"'i-ri?-; p ¥ Lfv ■^i..-' life Iftfe ^•5 Hi!! ZONING PILE I1604-ROOD CONTINUED Bellows asked Mr. Rood to elaborate around the pond. on his plans for the area Mr. Rood replied, "I thought I -^rould grow grass around it, just let it come back as it was. I have considered having a sanctuary/island in the middle of the pond. On the side near my yard, the wetland just blends into my yard. On the other side, there is a steep bank that washes out. There is an exposed gas line there. I would like to do something to divert the water so that erosion will not continue. Perhaps put in some rock walls.” It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Cohen, to table this application pending the receipt of a comprehensive plan and planting diagram from the applicant that will maintain the wetland in as natural a state as possible. Rov/lette asked if tabling the pond issue would also delay the monument issue. She stated that she preferred to address that issue separately. It waa the consensus of the Planning Commission to act on the monument issue separately. Motion, Ayes-6, Nays-0. Motion carried. Kelley asked whether M.:. Rood should make a separate application for the monuments. He asked the Planning Commission how they view the monuments. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that the monuments constitute a fence and should have a maximum height of 3.S feet. Mr. Rood stated that he had intended to plant Alpine Current in*between ^ the pillars. He said, "Alpine Current grows to a maximum height of three to four feet. It was my understanding from the Building Inspector that monuments could be six feet high in a backyard. I did not realize there was a dedicated right-of-way there." Bellows asked if the plantings between the pillars had to be restricted to a certain height. Mabusth stated that the City Code does not address the height for plantings except in cases where sight distance is a factor.” Bellows stated that if the City Ordinances are followed in_ _ _ _ _ _this case, constructed. something very hideous appearance may be Mr. Rood explained that he had intended to construct the pillars to be five feet high. He said, "The pillar height varies right now, but I would do some grading and filling around them to achieve a uniform five foot height. The shrubs would be three to - 9 - ■H; fe . & *W- p.} t'f-'i - ’ m-K - M-”’;Av- ■f'r ■ pi; ; ife ORONO PLAKNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 22, 1991ZONING FILE #1604-ROOD CONTINUED four feet.** Bellows suggested that it may to entirely forego the pillars. be in Mr. Rood's best interest Mr. Rood asked whether he could apply for a Variance to have the pillars five feet high. Kelley informed Mr. Rood that he had the right to submit a Variance application if he wished to do so. He said. 'However, the Planning Commission has been fairly consistent in recommending that fences along public roadways be no more than 3.5 feet high." #1605 OR. RICBARO LINDSTROM 1065 NB8T FBRNDALE ROAD VARIANCES CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC BEARING Charles Lindstrom, the applicant's brother, and Paul Bedker, the applicant's contractor, were present. Cohen stated that due to his professional relationship with Charles Lindstrom, he would abstain from the discussion and voting on this matter. Kelley opened the Public Hearing at 8:45 D^m. Gaffron distributed a sketch showing the revised roof heights and floor elevations. He said, "The applicants, for the most part, have revised their plan to keep hardcover out of the 0*‘75* setback area. The only encroachment in that area is above the existing house. Changes are still proposed for the 75-250* setback area. There must be a 30* pool setback from the side lot line and I am concerned about the elevation of the basement floor in relation to the flood plain." Mr. Bedker referred the Planning Commission to the sketch that Gaffron had distributed. He said, "You can see that the existing basement is below the flood plain elevation. He propose to construct the first level of the garage at the 932.6 elevation. The second level of garage would be at 939.11, which is approximately two feet above the existing main floor. The second floor addition would even out across the garage addition and the existing structure. We are proposing to construct a brick planter, approximately 40' long and 2* high, outside the main entrance to accommodate the 2' difference in the garage elevation. The driveway will slope up that additional two feet along the planter up to the garage." Bellows asked Mr. Bedker what the slope is coming out of the lower garage. ViV- .'Sf . Nr. Bedker replied, "He are proposing a 5% slope. - 10 - iiUiuiii h •r-.v-* ^iv m 1;^ W' ■ ORONO PLAimiNG COMMISSIOH MEETING JANUARY 22, 1991ZONING FILE #1605-LINOSTROM CONTINUEDBellows stated that there is only a 6'6 garage. clearance for the Mr. Bedker replied, "That should be 7»6". Bellows said, “If you take 939.11 and construction of the floor, that leaves 6'6 . code allow a 6'6" clearance?" subtract 11" for Will the building Mr. Bedker replied, "I believe that 6 clearance allowed." is the minimum Kelley asked the Planning Commission to address the issue of the Variances requested. Rowlette indicated that she had no objections. Hanson said, "I have no problem^ but if there was a project that I did not think should be done, this qualifies as one of them.* Bellows said, "The pool at this point is located behind the garage structure. There is a deck on the iLake side of the house. I am concerned that at some point in time, there will be another hardcover request to connect the deck and pool. Hanson complimented Mr. Bedker for his efforts to address the issues involved with this property, but thought that the improvements intensify the use of land. Bellows stated that this may be one of the properties in Orono that has reached it maximum level of development. She believed there were alternatives that could be explored. Moos stated that she would look favorably on this application, providing that hardcover not exceed the percentages proposed. Hanson asked if the encroachment into the average lakeshore ••tback presented any issues with the sight lines of adjacent properties. Gaffron stated that he did not believe the second story addition would have an impact on the neighbors' lake views. There were no comments from the public and Kelley closed the Public Hearing at 8:55 p.m. It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Moos, to recommend approval of the hardcover Variance in the 0-75* aid 75-250' setback areas as proposed, in addition to the average lakeshore - 11 - M:i% 0 jiip- Kry0i/ fe':*' ■ 0-pp:'- IS^r. ■3.^:(IpiIfe torIA. ^ MM'^ rtft: i|4 ORONO PLANNING COHHISSION MEETING JANUARY 22, 1991ZONING PILE I1605-LINDSTROH CONTINUED 86tback Varianca. Is is also reconunended that the applicant be placed on notice that no additional hardcover will be allowed within the 0-75' or 75-250' setback areas. Moos asked if the Planning Commission needed to address the one foot discrepancy in the garage clearance. Kelley stated that such an issue should be left to the Building Inspector. Gaffron noted that the pool, as proposed, does not meet the the 30' setback from the side lot line. Kelley stated that the pool should be constructed to meet that setback. He asked what homeowners do with the water drained frOTi swimming pools. Gaffron stated that the City does not allow pool water to be drained into the sewer or septic systems, but we have no restrictions about draining the water onto the yard. Kelley asked if the pool must be above the flood plain elevations. Gaffron stated that he would have to research that further. Motion, Ayes-3, Bellows and Hanson, Nay, Cohen abstained. Motion carried. •1611 BRUCE a CAMILLE CURTISS 1920 FA6ERHESS POUTT ROAD AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCES Mr. Jeff Mohr was present applicants. representative for the Kelley opened the Public Hearing at 7:23 p.m. and asked Staff to make a brief presentation. Gaffron summarized the information in his January 16, 1991 memo, noting that records seem to indicate that the existing deck is approximately the same size and dimension as the pre-existing deck. Hanson questioned'whether the footings have been determined to be adequate. Gaffron replied, "The City Building Inspector would review that as part of the building permit process." There were no public comments and at 7:25 p.m. Kelley closed the Public Hearing. It was moved by Hanson, seconded by Kelley, to recommend approval of the after-the-fact Variance for hardcover in the 0-75* zone, conditioned on confirmation from the Building Inspector that the footings are adequate, and payment of a double fee. Cohen suggested to Mr. Mohr that he relate to Mr. and Mrs. Curtiss the Planning Commission's dismay of the manner in which the deck construction was handled. Motion, Ayes-5, Bellows# Nay. Notion carried. Bellows indicated that there have been past incidences involving this property and that the applicants' actions were blatant and should not be rewarded. Cohen indicated that hu reluctantly voted aye. - 12 - u.. _ f.. i; ‘ , ”• . r-1• • / • ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 22, 1991 #1613 JENSEN HOMES, INC. 315 TONKANA ROAD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Mr. Jim Jensen was present. Kelley opened the Public Hearing at 7:28 p.m. and asked Staff to make a brief presentation. Mabusth provided a synopsis of the issues involved with this application, as set forth in her January 14, 1991 memo. She stated that the On-site Septic Evaluator has confirmed that it is possible to add on to the mound system to provide capacity for seven bedrooms. There is also additional area available to provide an alternate site with equal capacity. Cohen questioned whether it is a requirement to have two exits when dealing with an apartment unit. Mabusth stated that the Building Code does address the issue of exits, but bedroom is grade level and windows provide secondary egress. There were no comments from the public and Kelley closed the Public Hearing at 7:30 p.m. Cohen asked for assurance that the chain of title will reflect the fact that this is a non-rental unit. Mabusth stated that the resolution granting the Conditional Use Permit would be filed in the chain of title. It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Cohen, to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit for a non-rental apartment, based on the findings that it is possible to expand the mound system to accommodate the number of bedrooms within the house, that the house is located on a large parcel of land and there is a demonstrated need for the apartment. Motion, Ayes-6, Nays-0. Motion passed. #1614 JACK RHODE 1690 SHAOTIIOOD ROAD RKNENAL VARIANCE Mr. Rhode was present Kelley opened the Public Hearing at 7:56 p.m. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and Kelley closed the Public Hearing at 7:57 p.m. was moved by Cohen, seconded by Moos, to recommend approval of the renewal Variance to increase hardcover in the 75-250* setback area. Motion, Ayes-6, Nay«*'‘: Motion carried. - 13 - fe ­te- 0$'-Mi p'-' i fe ■ i- fe ^ ' -:• V OROHO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 22, 1991 • • #1610 GLORIA GILMER 25 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD NORTH ®*®^Gaf!^n*di8™ayed'°t?e®app^^^ plan and reviewed the issues involved with subdividing the property. He depicted the areas that would most likely be used for septic and building sites for Lot 2. Mrs. Gilmer stated that her surveyor had re-drawn the sketch and distributed a copy to each Planning Commissioner. She said, “The revised plan corrects the initial exclusion of the 33 riaht-of-way and provides Lot 1 with a 200 foot minimum width. I would still request a Variance for the driveway area v*ith a p^j^petual Easement on Lot 2 for the existing driveway. Kelley stated that it is consistently his position that he does not recommend approval of Variances for subdivisions He said, "This property has an unusual shape and character. l question whether there is adequate area to provide the necessary septic and building sites." The Planning Commission, as a whole, concurred with Kelley s statements. Kelley stated that the key issue is whether or not there are correct soils and adequate area to provide a primary and alternate septic site for Lot 2, as well as an alternate site for Lot 1. Gaffron noted that there may also be flood plain factors that would need consideration. Kelley suggested to Mrs. Gilmer that she approach her neighbors and discuss possible options involving adjacent property. #1617 MARC NHITBHBAO 1220 LYMUi AVENUE 8RRCH PLAN RBVIEN - PROPOSED SUBDIVISION Tracy whitehead, aid her surveyor, Walter Gregory, were present. Gaffron displayed the Whiteheads* sketch plan and briefly explained their proposal. Hanson was appalled at the existing road and cul-de-sac configuration for Lyman Avenue and the private road beyond. He said, "It is this street, as well as a couple others, that make in^ scream about what kind of garbage are we doing in this City in the name of cheapness. I will call it nothing more than that. I am amazed that anyone further back on the private road can even have fire insurance. I would propose that before we go any - 14 - 0. ■ ;'■> . . .. . ■1:-- ■• • tkfiJ:: '■■ fc'*'•>mh If-iK.; ■ W,-mi':'1> -J fc? - km ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 22, 1991 ZONING PILE #1617>NHITEHEAD CONTINUED further with this sketch plan review, that the road be addressed." Rowlette agreed that access is a major issue in this proposed subdivision. Gaffron continued with his review of the issues, noting that the Whiteheads had located septic sites first and then determined where lot lines should be. He said, "The lot lines are gerrymandered, which should pose no problem, and each lot does contain two acres. There is not much leeway for widening the road or constructing a cul-de-sac. That is why access has been proposed as shown. The Planning Commission should consider how many houses this driveway will serve and whether it should be constructed to City standards." Hanson said, "I would be satisfied only with the existence of a City standard road." Gaffron asked Hanson to clarify whether he was addressing only Lyman Avenue or was calling for an interior roadway and cul-de-sac to serve the new lots." Hanson stated that his first priority is to see that Lyman Avenue be completed and brought within City ^standards. He said, "If we are talking about three lots, there should be an interior road." Kelley concurred and added, "We need to clean this area up. If the Hhiteheads want to develop and increase the density in this area, Lyman Avenue needs to function properly. This is a four-lot subdivision and it should be done within the City’s guidelines." Hanson stated that he had no objections to the gerrymandered lot lines and would perhaps consider Variance approval for substandard lot width. Ns. Whitehead commented, "We have owned the property since 1967 and the lots are already platted. We could have just sold them in that manner, but wanted to maintain the rural character of the area, which is why we moved here in the first place. Everyone who lives in the area appreciates the rural character and the country road. When we considered subdividing the property, we wanted to present something that our neighbors would favor. We especially wanted to leave the topography and woods intact as much as possible. Because we do not want City sewer in this area, we located primary and alternate septic sites that could provide capacity for a five bedroom home We then hired a surveyor who walked the property and used Orono's guidelines to locate the building sites to be unobtrusive with one another. - 15 - V -3 i •: 'J I,:-' tl' fv- ‘ ■ "W l^^■• t'.ir -r.--. f P; ' ii’lfi't IK:Tf life: ORONO PLAHNIMG COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 22, 1991 ZOHING FILE #1617-NHITEHEAD CONTINUED while meeting required setbacks. There has been no problem with t.he road for us or any of the other persons living on it. I don't believe there will be any further developments that would achieve access via Lyman Avenue. We have allowed for a 30' width of Lyman Avenue, and I believe it is 15' or 16' now." Kelley stated that the City has an obligation to provide adequate access to residents* Cohen said, "I believe that we would be liable for anything that may happen should we approve something less than what is adequate." Ms* Whitehead stated that the road has existed for 25 years without incident* Cohen responded, "Yes, but you are now reque^cing a rather large expansion of that area." Bellows concurred with Kelley and Cohen that the Planning Commission and Council has a responsibility to consider the safety and well-being of the residents* She said, "Evan if a condition has existed for 100 years, it is up to us to look at the consequences that may occur when a change is proposed. We must correct the situation, rather than aggravating it further*" Ms. Whitehead stated that Lyman Avenue as it now exists, not meet City standards* She asked what her responsibility %iould be in terms of providing access. Bellows replied, "You would be required to build to our minimum standards*" Hanson added, "Regardless of whether Lyman Avenue is brought up to those standards*" Gaffron asked, "Doss that mean that you want to see all four served by a road with a 50* outlet and a 100' cul-de-sac?" Kelley replied, "That may be negotiable, at least from my point of view," Gaffron asked, "Would a point of negotiation be the upgrade of Lyman Avenue from a certain point to another, in exchange for the cul-de-sac?" Kelley replied, "It may be possible to have an exit directly onto Lyman Avenue and leave the access to the existing house as is. There could then be a private driveway serving the other two houses. That may be an option, maybe not." - 16 - 4' 1• • L.f UA’: Kiii- « I-■t^:> M: t-ti'l>: •;-’Vi O *1. JV ■ '■J\k‘^ V fe'' i‘*t- M, Wi ;|. -•AW-: ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JAN'JARY 22, 1991 ZC.IING PILE fl617-WHITEBEAO CONTINUED Mr. Gregory asked whether Outlot dedicated as a public street. A would have to be Kelley replied, "That is correct. could be dedicated to a homeowners' association." Kelley asked tne Planning Commission to give their opinion about Lot 4 achieving access directly onto Lyman Avenue. Hanson stated that he did not object. Bellows objected. Moos did not object. Rowlette stated that it is fairly hilly in that area and had concern about sight lines. Hanson suggested that Lot 4 access via Outlot B for safety reasons. Gaffron said, "If that were the case, there will be three houses served by Outlot B, which will trigger the need to build to City standards." Cohen stated that he too was concerned about the safety of an access onto Lyman Avenue in that location. Kalley suggested that the Whiteheads prepare several different options for access. tlClB WILLIAM F. PUCEL 1350 BALOOR PARK ROAD 8KBTCB PLAN REVIEW - PROPOSED VARIANCES This item was removed from the agenda as applicant. requested by the SPECIAL MEETING It was agreed that the Planning Commission would meet February 20, 1991 at 5:30 p.m. to review proposed zoning amendments• PLAWWING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE COMMENTS: None. APPROOAL OF MINOTES-NOVENBER 19, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING It %fas moved by Cohen, seconded by Moos, to approve the minutes of the November 19, 1990 Planning Commission meeting. Motion, Ayes**6, Nays-0. Notion carried. PLAMWIMG COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE It was agreed that Sara Moos would attend the February 11, 1991 Council meeting as the Planning Commission Representative. - 17 - .-- - - - - - - - ^ U ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 22, 1991HISCBLLAHBOOS m »K6lley suggested that it would be beneficial to the PlanningCommission if they worked with the various departments involved with development, such as the Park Commission, the Septic Inspector, etc. Kelley stated that there were many procedural and functional aspects of the various City departments that he did not fully understand. The Planning Commission agreed that presentations various departments would be helpful. Nabusth stated that she would work with the dssion to schedule presentations. * ♦ * from the Planning ADJOORMHBNT ,.It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to adjourn the January 22, 1991 meeting at 9:45 p.m. ir - 18 - # M % W: ■,’Vv V-: i-:4-' M Ml TO: LMCD MEMBER CITIES " for your Informatlc1^ STATE OF klMES^TT/Sx L.DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES PHONE NO. He^ro Waters, 1200 Warner Rd. St. Paul, MN 55106 t.«« -t«,« FILE NO772-7910 February 5, 1991 Mr. Gene Stronunen Executive Director Lake Minnetonka conservation District 900 E. Hayzata Blvd. - Suite 160 Wayzata, NN 55391 FEB 8 1991 RE? EXPEDITING SHORELAND GRANT AGREEMENTS Dear Mr. Stronunen: In light of the State's financial constraints of our fiscal year ending June 30^ 1991, each subject agreement between the individual nember city, the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD), and the Department of Natui.*! Resources (DNR) needs to be executed as soon as possible. Please note that each agreement requires . a number of signatures on behalf of the State of Minnesota before the funds are encumbered. We are therefore asking you to assist us by getting the cities to make their commitments as soon as possiole. The LMCD member cities can complete this process by either signing and returning the grant agreement included in the DNR letter dated December 27, 1990 to the LMCD, or by submitting a letter to LMCD indicating that city's intention to not participate in the grant agreement process. We hope to see this matter closed by March 15, 1991. Ed Pick of our staff has visited with attorneys »-epresenting the cities of Deephaven, Shorewood, and woodland by celephone. Both attorneys indicated that they would recommend that the councils for .the three cities take affirmative action to sign the grant agreements. p^j^tiaps this topic could be discussed either at the next LMCD meeting or in the next mailing that you make to your member cities. If we may be of assistance in this matter, do not hesitate to contact either Ed Pick or me. Sincerely, kin L. Stine Regional Hydrologist, Region 6 cc:Ceil Strau^», Area Hydrologist Peder Otterson, Shore Ian.' Sup arvisor Ed Pick, Shoreland Hydrologist Steve Prestin, Consultant to LMCD FED V 1991 a.: u r1^’ % i ' hr h wy}f%r'•%»* iv, i kI S-i *•'' ■’• ;.v.^- f I ii.\ I-. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT February 7, 1991 TOt Hayors, LMCD Member Cities FROMt SUBJt Chair Dave Cochran Board Action concerning Metropolitan Council Systems Coimnittee Review or Lake Minnetonka Long-Term Management Program The January 23 LMCD Board meeting agenda included a review and action on the Metropolitan Council staff report, findings and recommendations to its Metropolitan Systems Comittee ■*a*-ed 1-15-91. A subsequent amendment to the findings and recoHieni' »i adopted by the Metropolitan Systems Com­ mittee vaa received l-23-‘^ s of this information are enclosed. The Systeow Committee proposed a ol^ uionths period as an outside time allow­ ance during which LMCD and its member cities are to resolve Management Program jhe six months time period was recommended to the Board as an exten- aion of the Metropolitan Council's coranent and review authority, which is limited by statute to 60 days. That 60 days had an expiration date of 2-4-91. The Systems Committee also pledged a staff assistant to guide and facilitate the resolution process between LMCD and its member cities. Upon review by the Board, there was considerable concern to make the best 0f time to resolve the differences. The outcome of the Board's review was to approve a 90 day extension of the Metropolitan Council review and coHwnt period. That begins February 5. Further details of the Board's ggg tMOt will be in the 1-23-91 Board minutes to follow soon. As of February 6, the first meeting was held with Pat Pahl, manager of the Metro Governance Division, and the assigned staff assistant, Ann* Hurlburt, manager. Comprehensive Plannlag and Local Assistance for the Metropolitan Council. Pahl and Hurlburt will be developing a process for bringing the IjfGD and mesd>er cities together ot. the substantive areas of disagreement. A prompt contact with the cities will begin before mid-February to undertake this process. The Board is committed to seeing the results of chls process meet everyone's expectations within this 90 day tine frame. Should you have questions in the Interim, please contact me at 473-4743, and your Board representative. He look forward to our teamwork achieving the desired results for each city and the best for Lake Minnetonka. enc ctone I Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Hennepin Parks Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol MR Dim Division of Waters Senator Gen Olson Senator Judy Traub Senator Renneke Rep. Steve Smith Rep. Jerry Knickerbocker Rep. Ron Abrams Rep. Larry Bodahl ilEi. ^«r'itin.. S'-’ ■■' s-waa*^' S335 S II SOUTHaEVATIQS. iM‘^n-0 ’ -B '-I^oren J>e«N -■-wsiv, w f: ■■^'^;‘^i.>J''"f.. ~^-ia PROTECTED AREA AMOCO 2«» SILT rercE OR equivalent -ANCHORING POST SfWA6C, WATER £ DRAINA&E ESMT. -eu BC a ' IHOilO* COMTPOt poici e.H. TOP Mta r TOMoa. «MD aoD ■ ■ MTAMMO WM.L •Nfluaa AT BAU OF W. OBLIVBRV RAMP CONC. DOCK CLEV: S2.B7 —f REPLACE CLEARED POUAQE WITM NATURAUZBtO TREEB AND IHRUBB . j e -ore rtle ;<; de 11;' a .' ;j ' n '^■a tn i i y 33^3 Ou:-‘- MS' NEENAH NO. e iTaj FUME 4 OttTE (O) EQUAL) AND FUBM _ «1H GMUNO M LANDSCAPED z-r USAS. PBECAST eOHC.ADJUS1»N! NMCS (2 HN- i MAX.) SET MHOS M nXl HOKTAA 8E0 AND CROUT ON 0U190C OREAIER 1MAN T-C* PLACE IS OIA. • 12* EACH NMV. DETAIL NOT TO SCALE CATCM SASIM/auMPf IDADlUAi DOCK SITE DATA EIISTINS WIIDIM MOPOSED WIIOING TOTAL I«.lt2 S.F. S.1M S.F. 22,310 S.F. PARKING SPACES loa 4.1 C.N.A, SITC AREA (GROSS)137,161 S.F. COUNTY ROAD R.O.M.13,320 S.F. SMC AREA (NET)123,041 S.F. lUlLDtNG « - SITE NET 14.on PLANT SCHEDULE SYHBOl (HIANinv PLANT NAME SIZE CONTAINER A 3 AUSTRIAN PINE (P1NUS NIGRA) 5'SSI B 7 AMERICAN AR0ORVITAC (THUJA OCCIDENTAUS) 5'SIS C e SMOOTH SUMAC (RHUS GLABRA) 2«-POT 0 ALL AREAS THAT ARC DISTURBED DUE TO CONSlWCTION tflU BE REVEGCTATCO UITH SEED AND MULCH 1006.13 ■ S;i m0^ m r- 1 ■^37 C i||*€l. «"••••»'m -fi i ■5 \ , ... ■ ?1 »\ A \■ -’i ■ /.../‘-% ••f'A.. / / ;7-?(7/ 5>>7/ \P-'.A iT; n 7:^ •Ii IP*-*--;' A -*/"->—»‘t-gg?^ L> _-J Vv -rj-»77, . t p^j/ ^ P r.A Vv . 0 V iN V, A V. A’ *‘C, »> . C-. */L.OiS^ Y- r^h Jim jX.t/O I N N t TO •• r/(^os /Ohf^ ■Fr.lKe ‘{’'c‘'cr,^'ss IN LOT 27. FAOCRNESS HENNEMN COUNTT. NINNESOTA f^ofO ff^7 |:f ' i('■'vi; '■% ' XX .....% fl-1 tlie''un«len Avtnue*whlci)'sald"unint"i«^» I! Uescrjl»eil as riiMous; CoMencIng at a poinl uii ilie Si •e SouthMst cornar of «a?d i«t * Juduclal •onumoni. a distance of WSr feet liorUi.justei I > .enli thence SSntiJuInu at ***?!:*?? * distance of 69.00 tent lo ., i.ni.it n. ioMows; Cnmencina at*a c« fk***? **** shore of Lake Minnetonka and lyimj Soiiih and u ■ aiiiht line hearinq North**3S“00*"Fi^t f !"* • "*den Avenue a distance of loo fern0 1 III I line nearing north 35 00' fast froM the linot nni no fi.iini i.f i h.> ^.miii,^i.M nr I v I *«.■ ..| n>i- t.. i •-V 5„'.M I , :i n m':W4 mirns^ K AAvr ^ '■■ '' ' ^ S- / r F*