Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
10-26-1992 Council Packet
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 26, 1992 ROLL The Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Peterson, CouncMmembers J. Diann Goetten and Gabriel Jabbour. Edward Callahan and Mary ’iutler were absent. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, PubIIc Works Director John Gerhardson, Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, City Attorney Thomas Barrett, City Engineer Glenn Cook and City Recorder Terl Naab. Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. (#1) PRESENTATION BY SENIOR SERVICE REPRESENTATIVES JoAnn Kvern, Senior Community Services, Introduced Dotty O’Brien of the Westonka Senior Center, Phyllis Sprague of the Tamarack Senior Center, Peg Kamholz of Senior Community Servles, and Mabel Belt and Dorothy Rauschendorfer, residents of Orono. O’Brien explained various activities the center is involved in and noted membership has risen from 150 to 660+ in recent years. She submitted a copy of the center’s newsletter and thanked the Council for their support. Kamholz explained hter responsibilities with the Senior Community Services and thanked the Council for their continuing support. Mayor Peterson stated the Council appreciates the report and the efforts made by the different organizations. (•2) CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Peterson removed Item #3. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 3, nays 0. to approve the Motions for all items adopted by consent agenda will bo Included In the minutes in their respective numerical order. (#3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mayor Peterson said she did not attend the meeting and would not vote on the minutes. it was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Council held on October 12, 1992. Ayes 2, nays 0. Mayor Peterson abstained. i i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 26, 1992 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT JoEllen Hurr noted the upcoming Board meeting to be held October 28th. The Board will hold public hearirgs regarding the styrofoam ordinance, the multiple dock I icense for Nelson/Gage on Stubbs Bay, and the joint dock license for Pheasant Lawn. Hurr reported a training session on monitoring the Lake was held on October 10th for 28-35 people. She stated they still need approximately 12 more people to help with the project. Jabbour reported on the process of the Lake Access Task Force. He stated the process is ailing. He understood development of the Maxwell Bay site was not to commence until the Task Force produced their findings, but felt that was not going to happen. He stated the Chair of the Task Force seems to be making all the decisions on the LMCD’s behalf. He explained the former site of the Mai Tai restaurant in Excelsior is available to the DNR, but It was explained to him that the DNR will not consider the site. He requested the Council express their desire to have the LMCD adopt a policy on how they should make decisions about potential public access locations. Goetten understood when the Task Force process began, they would look at possibilities in other communities. Hurr stated there is no criteria in place to '.or i' at other sites. Jabbour noted no one thought the process of thj« Tdsi* take as long as it has taken. He ft; it it unfair that ’ provide pubiic access was not shareo squally among tne He indicated the LMCD has a serious perception reiterated Scott Carlson of Minnetrlsta was the community to provide representation religiously for held by the Task Force. He noted it Is a ve•y diverse the lake. Force would he burden to I ake cities, problem. He only other the meetings group around Mayor Peterson asked about support from other communities regarding Jabbour’s request to the LMCD. Hurr noted she would bring the request up at the next meeting, and suggested the Council garner additional support for the December meeting if it is deemed necessary. i 0 0 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 26, 1992 PUBLIC COMMENTS Curt Quady, 1223 South Brown Road, explained he wishes to construct a new garage on his property and went to the City for direction where it was explained he is in a 2 acre zoning district and would need a variance ^.nd a survey. He asked the Counci I why they do not rezone the Cryttai Bay area to reflect current development. He added he does not believe in the variance process. Goetten stated it was originally zoned 2 acres to curtail further development. She noted It Is a major effort to rezone property. Jabbour asked the affect of such rezonIng on the 64/640 rule. Gaffron felt rezonIng this area would not affect that rule as It is within the MUSA boundary. Jabbour added even If the property were rezoned, a survey would still be required. Quady reported, a year ago he asked the City to remove a dead tree at the rear of his property within an alleyway. He said recently he and a neighbor took down the tree as the City did not respond to his request. He asked why other areas of the City have a better response time to requests such as this. Moorse explained dead trees are generally removed during the winter. Jabbour felt the service should be provided on a first come first serve basis, with those most hazardous conditions taking precedence. Goetten suggested Moorse review the issue and report back to the Counc I I. («4) «1521 J. VOGT & M. HILBELINK, 115 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD NORTH - FINAL SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION #3190-A John Vogt and Mike Hilbelink were present. Mabusth explained the new applicants have fulfilled all conditions of the final subdivision approval. In addition, the applicants are requesting an additional curb cut off Old Crystal Bay Road for Lot 2, Block 2. Staff does not recommend the additional curb cut based on the City Engineer’s recommendation. i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 26, 1992 ZONING FILE #1521 - CONT. Hilbelink felt the lot dictates the additional curb cut as it wiIi create a very long driveway for that property and the building envelope is better laid out with access from Old Crystal Bay Road. He reminded them that there currently is a cut there. Goetten stated the request sounds logical, but referred to the City Engineers findings that the cut would be unsafe. Vogt stated Phil Nelson shot distances at the top of the hiM at 200’. Cook said they are looking for 300’ of sighting. Mabusth noted If the plat Is amended, the outlet would not be needed and the plat would have to be reviewed b^ the Planning Commission. It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3190-A for Application #1521 for J. Vogt and M. Hilbelink of 115 Old Crystal Bay Road North, for final subdivision approval. Ayes 3, nays 0. (#5) #1765 JOHN MOORE, 801 TONKAWA ROAD - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3191 James Cradit was present. Gaffron explained the applicant has provided an updated survey and proposed additional hardcover removals In the 0-75’ zone. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3191 for Application #1765 for John Moore, 801 T«pnkawa Road, for variances to construct an addition to the existing residence. Ayes 3, nays 0. (#6) #1766 HOWARD EISINGER, 3245 WAYZATA BOULEVARD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3192 Howard Eisinger was present. Mabusth reported the Planning Commission recommended approval for 10,000 cubic yards o1 additional fill, based on the 3,000 to 4,000 cubic yards still available from the Stubbs Bay project. It was also recommended, prior to any future request for additional fill, the entire project be reviewed by applicant’s consultant and the City Engineer. She asked If Eisinger plans to expand beyond the 300x500’ fill site. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 26, 1992 ZONING FILE #1766 - CONT. Eisinger said he plans to expand to the south. Jabbour agreed with the Planning Commission recommendation, but questioned how the City could have approved 100,000 cubic yards originally and now is only approving 10,000 cubic yards of that original approval. He asked why the applicant should come before them 10 times to obtain the amount of the original approval. Mabusth explained the original amount was for a much larger area and the fill was available. Goetten agreed, and stressed the need to review the situation prior to the applicant submitting another conditional use permit. Mayor Peterson asked Eisinger If he intends to expand upon the area being filled. Eisinger stated that is his long-term goal. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3192 for Application #1765 Howard Eisinger, 3245 Wayzata Boulevard, for a conditional use permit for an additional 20,000 cubic yards of fill. Ayes 3, nays 0. (#7) #1772 JAMES BROOKS, 3785 WATERTOWN ROAD - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3193 It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3192 for AppIicatlon #1772 Jeunes Brooks, 3785 Watertown Road, approving a variance to reconstruct a porch to the existing residence. Ayes 3, nays 0. (#8) DRAFT LETTERS OF RESPONSE - FLEXIBILITY REQUESTS It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to table consideration until Callahan was available. Ayes 3, nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT A) Jabbour reported that the last Planning Commission meeting did not run as smoothly as it should. He felt some applications were brought before the Planning Commission prematurely and applicants were not informed prior to the meeting of the recommendation to table or the need for additional information. J MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 26, 1992 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. Goetten reminded them the City is a service oriented business and shouid run that way. Mayor Peterson stated there may be underiying circumstances. B) Jabbour reported after research he has discovered the City not be saving money by instaliing the underground gas tanks, may in fact, save money by buying at the pump. He reminded them original budget called for 3 tanks, and they are only Install 2, and that is the reason they are underbudget In this area, added, the amount of diesel fuel s-ored In one tank will supply City for a three year period. may and the I ng He the Mayor Peterson felt they may have been mislead on more than one i tern. Jabbour stated they had promised the residents this project would not be staff-driven. He added the City may end up purchasing tank insurance which will be an additional expense. Barrett Indicated he was sure the City did not have any insurance for clean-up from the tanks. Jabbour stated the Council was told the City was insured for clean up under the current policy. Goetten asked if it was too late to cancel the contract for the tanks. Jabbour stated it was presented to the Council that the City would Vv°nr%r tU is a factor. He added, the amount of fuel one tank will hold will last the City three years, and felt that an exorbitant amount. Craig Linden, 2655 North Shore Drive, suggested the Council cancel the order for the tanks and pay the cost Involved to cancel. He felt the long-term negative affect of the tanks would outweigh the initial loss. Moorse stated he would check the following day and report to the Council immediately. 6 A— MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 26, 1992 ENGINEER’S REPORT (#9) REQUEST FOR PAYMENT #3 - ELEVATED WATER STORAGE TANK Jabbour asked if the City needs to provide notice to the adjacent community that the City would not be purchasing water in the near future. Moorse stated he would check on that. It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Goetten, to authorize Pay Request #3 for the Installation of the 400,000 gallon elevated tank to PDM, INC. in the amount of $179,464.50. Ayes 3, nays 0. (#10) REQUEST FOR PAYMENT #3 IMPROVEMENT - STUBBS BAY SANITARY SEWER Cook stated they are two-thirds done with the project. Jabbour stated, at a recent Planning Commission meeting, residents from Leaf Street expressed their appreciation for the work done by the engineers to proserve the vegetation in the area. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to authorize Pay Request #3 for the Stubbs Bay sanitary sewer improvement to Progressive Contractors, Inc., for an amount of $272,411.08. Ayes 3, nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT («11) PUBLIC VS. PRIVATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF BRIAR STREET Moorse referred to his memo which examines the question. He stated the City has not been consistent in the past and history tended to dictate action. He noted there has not been any changes in the past 10 years. Goetten felt they should be reviewing the whole issue. She felt they could not treat anyone’s request differently. Jabbour stated the City currently has several other requests to maintain other roads. Mayor Peterson stated she contacted two previous owners who indicated the City had plowed the street periodically In the past, but did not maintain the road. She was told the reason they discontinued plowing service was because one resident on the street complained about the rocks being dislocated from plowing. r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 26, 1992 PUBLIC VS. PRIVATE - BRIAR STREET - CONT. Gerhardson explained the reason the road was once plowed In the past was because a homeowner requested it to be so to a part-time driver who was unaware of the situation. Mayor Peterson stated the City placed a sewer pipe in the road without easements. Jabbour said the City could install sewer also. in the private streets Barrett explained that during the subdivision process a road i s platted which says the road can be or is dedicated to the public. The City has taken the position that the developer will plat the road and maintain In the future. He opined that all the private roads In the City are defined as outlots with the City obtaining underlying public easements. The road outlot remains under private ownership and maintenance. Jabbour asked the difference between this street and Oxford Road. Mabusth explained the private road appears as an outlot where this specific section of Briar Street is shown as a public road. The general public may not use a private road, but they may a public road. Goetten stated they must be fair to all residents, and felt to do so, the City must adopt a new policy. Mayor Peterson asked why the public roads were not brought up to City standards during the reinstallatIon of the roads after the sewer project. Rich Kieman, 1212 Briar Street, noted the map distinguishes his road as a pub Iic road. He felt the Counci I should err In favor of the resident until the issue Is resolved. He felt if the road is public and platted, the road should be plowed as are all other sub standard City streets within the City. Mabusth noted the road is platted such that it loops through to South Brown Road but has not be^n developed. Gaffron noted there are many different types of roads within the City, and noted there is no rational basis other than historical precedent that can explain which roads the City has maintained. 8 I I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 26, 1992 PUBLIC VS. PRIVATE - BRIAR STREET - CONT. Moorse explained the City adopted a Comprehensive Plan in 1980 which addressed the Issue. He said that policy should be reviewed and updated. Goetten suggested waiting until a full Council was available to make a decision on this issue. It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Jabbour, to approve the request by Rich Kieman, 1212 Briar Street, for the City to plow his public street, and to direct City staff to review the public vs. private road issue within a certain timeframe. Mayor Peterson felt the City owes Mr. Kieman an answer. Jabbour asked Mayor Peterson if she -<ou I d amend her motion deleting approval of the request by Kieman. Mayor Peterson said she would not. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to table consideration of the request by Rich Kieman. Ayes 2, nays 1. Mayor Peterson voted nay. (#12) CITY HALL ft PUBLIC WORKS BUILDINGS APPLICATION & CERTIFICATE OF PAYMENT #8 It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Jabbour, to authorize Payment #8 for City Hall and Public Works Building in the amount of $355,266.51, as listed in memo dated October 19, 1992. Ayes 3, nays 0. (#13) VOICE & DATA CABLING CONTRACT AWARD Goetten asked if the cabling would allow for future networking In the Council chambers for television. Moorse said this contract does not cover that, but it has been planned for as much as possible. He added this contract Includes the Police Department. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to award the telephone and computer cabling contract to A.U.S. Communications In the amount of $15,315.00 plus appiicable sales tax. Ayes 3, nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 26, 1992 (t14) SIGNAGE FOR NEW CITY FACILITIES It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Jabbour, to select the wording for the sIgns at the new City facilities as "VIIIage Hall". Ayes 3, nays 0. (««14A) CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S ONE YEAR ANNIVERSARY SALARY ADJUSTMENT It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to approve the City AdmInIstrator, Ron Moorse, salary adjustment to Step 2, 1992 amount $58,498.00, and to provide a salary adjustment at the first of the year commensurate with the annual Increase made to the salary range. Ayes 3, nays 0. (««15) LICENSES There were no licenses. (««16) BILLS It was moved by Goe^fcr', seconded by Jabbour, of the All Funds Account. Ayes 3, nays 0. to approve payment ADJOURNMENT Mayor Peterson adjourned the regular Orono City Council meeting at 9:30 p.m. to Executive Session. Ayes 4, nays 0. I PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATEE -fog. AGENDA FOR COONCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, OCTOBER 26, 1992, 7:00 P.M. (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon request. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. ROLL CALL Mi 1. Presentation By Senior Service Representatives Oct 2. CONSENT AGENDA*Oi’Ty S6 Of^ J99? APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 3. Regular Meeting of October 12, 1992 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT - JoEllen Hurr I-i*presentat 1/a PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT **APPLICANTS** Immediately after the Council has reviewed your application please sign the three (3) original resolutions at the Recorder's desk. Applicants need not execute resolutions for subdivisions, vacations and denials. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. #1521 J. Vogt & M. Hilbelink, 115 Old Crystal Bay Road North - Final Subdvision - Resolution #1765 John Moore, 801 Tonkawa Road - Varirnce - Resolution #1766 Howard Eisinger, 3245 Wayzata Boulevard - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution #1772 James Brooks, 3785 Watertown Road - Variance - Resolution Draft Letters of Response - Flexibility Requests MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT ENGINEER REPORT 9. Request for Payment #3 10. Request for Payment Improvement - Elevated Water Storage Tank #3 - Stubbs Bay Sanitary Sewer 12. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT ^ i .. «11. Public vs. Private Responsibility for the Maintenance of Briar Street .... . , , ... jCity Hall and Public Works Buildings Application and Certificate of Payment #8 Voice and Data Cabling Contract Award Signage For New City Facilities 14A. City Administrator One Year Anniversary Salary Adjustment CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 13. 14. LICENSES (15*) BILLS (16*) ADJOURNMENT i 1AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, OCTOBER 26, 1992, 7:00 P.M INFORMATION ITEMS INCLUDED IN COUNCIL PACKET Memo Regarding Western Hennepin County Pioneers Association Display Letter From City of Tonka Bay Dated 10/19/92 Minutes of Orono School District Meeting of 9/28/92 Notice of Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission 1992 Volunteer Recognition Awards on 10/29/92 Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission Agenda for 10/19/92 and Minutes of September 1992 Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Agenda 10/20/92 Metropolitan Council Memo Dated 10/9/92 Lake Minnetonkci Conservation District Memo Regarding Multiple Dock License Fee Review Status Association of Metropolitan Municipalities - Proposed AMM Policy for 1993 Legislative Session Miscellaneous Mail UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS l0/^^ - Council Meeting 7 p«m • 10/28 - Lake Use Com’'*ttee 7:45 a.m. 10/28 - Public Accuracy Test Election Equipment 2 p.m. 10/28 • Election Judge Training Session 2 p.m. 10/29 - Election Judge Training Session 7 p.m. 11/02 - Park Commission 7 p.m. 11/03 - BLLCTION DAT - MO PUBLIC MEETINGS UNTIL 8:00 P.M. 11/04 - Canvassing Board 4 p.m. (Certify Municipal Election Results) 11/06 - Work Session Preliminary *93 Budget 3 p.m. 11/09 - Council Meeting 7 p.m. 11/11 - Holiday - Veterans Day 11/16 - Planning Commission 11/23 - Council Meeting 7 p.m. 11/26 - Holiday - Thanksgiving Day 11/27 - Holiday 12/01 - Truth in Taxation Meeting 7 p.m. 12/07 - Park Commission 7 p.m. 12/09 - Reconvened Truth in Taxation Meeting 7 p.m. (If Needed) 12/14 - Council Meeting 7 p.m. 12/24 - Holiday 12/25 - Holiday - Christmas r L. vJ. ft ( TO: FROM: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator DATE:October 22, 1992 ^'V> (? ‘‘0. SUBJECT: Presentation by Senior Services Representatives Representatives from the Tamarack Senior Center^ the Westonka Senior Center and the Senior Community Services organization will attend the October 26th Council meeting to present information concerning the services provided by each of the organizations. The city currently provides funding for each of the organizations. milk / \*4y erator % rvices Repiesentatives c Senior Center, the Westonka itv Services organization will =*eting to present information by each of the organizations. funding for each of the 3^.■v:..«-.^v: ■ •.; .'i/Jyp* K'%: “ ;*■>»; \7^ fea ail ) \ m:mm -s*T: ■■ 4.^ “ 1 . ♦■ »* \\ A* '£i^ <■ 9m , S!1 »i^ I■ts'ii.l-mli^a/-- 5%*<>--‘"v>-- 'WMmiW%M zmm •- zyizsyy- .^ ■ V a >'^:v ,., m WSm&gmm. ^■£w^ •<> >i i r.*y [• •C- '^i .i' >f •' '•% Ki'. ' ''.‘A' •' . '^'^m v^Ay S P. O ur 40th A nniversary of Serviceim,;aVi, . - r •N 1 ^ ,.. •% ♦. ^\L_miyom m-ixm I'sfelK AUnilBlWtni Agency ' •. . ' "f.. ..-• ■•:, •■ -^-^ K ■: ■• -ilipisi ,V a; ft) U)D ^ OCu ^ ^ c ui 3 :r ^ ST O - Z v« jDcc 3 5 V5 iRY OF Service •irt*3 oO 3 5 5'o 3D enc 3 o‘•-1 n c 3 3 c 3 H X m n o < m a- ?o a >3 po 3! 5 ‘ 3- Oc ■■ >. :': ■■ ■ ■•: ...■. .' a ^ KM <o 3 in •-I < no V5 ^ n o z z m 2nn c r- r- O r, O X 05 I > E» 2 2 ^ rn i X > 5 H X PQ m m z Si 23? I OQ O 3 3 o’ 3 7) pH •': ■•::;r-iv- >-• . - 0-. -:. ,' : ;:j^ :‘‘\'^V^>::: 3 3 D- &) 3 O X o C3o3 (T#- T3 O 5 • W 3 Si CJ 3#*• 1 £ G. g 3cn r-^ 0 7 c G. C G- 3 Cu 3 r, O 3 3c 3 5 =sr. ^ 3 Q < o c" 3 •-1 vr. c X C c -1 c/)c 3 no 3 3 c inc < r/ C7 7 G *-1 < X C ?T C Ml »T 3 O'c 3 OQ Cu 3 3 2^ rr* o’ t3 '< C 7 §. 3 o C 3 cc =3^0 oc M 3-Q 3 X 3 ’ o X o X "3 •m* §: S- gI ‘< "Oc c M < 3 M 3 < 3 r 2 O r-*- ' 5 3 X 3 3 M X C3 Xc G- C 3 nQ X < 3 cn cc M o < 3 o c M c X *r3c M c 3 3- O M 5* 3 3 1. 3 O 5 ’T3 3 X 3 CTi C 3 O '< M 3 3 O 3 3 O' 3 3 CL 3l: - 9:rr 5 3 CL 3* 3 ;- a: 5 3 Hrr 3 •T3 3. :T o or) “ 3 H or c Q 3 3 o '<a 3 -1 or. ‘*1 'Xc o oc X 3“c 02 M - 5 o' 9 3a 3 3 3- O C3 3 M G. < 3 M cn ic ? £ o 5 3•< &r C o ^ a “S. ? c ^ 3 a. 5. T3 s: 3 3 c 3 'Xc </> 2 3 ^ C - t 5 <* c CL 3“ C 2, o 3 n MP. £. .T a - 3* »ii« • X O 9- 3 o 3 G. 3 3 3"GG C o'3 3 3 G n G 5 *3 -1 3"w G 3 3*g’ O 3T »3 c 1 M • X 3 X. X 3 M 3 PM> j 3 3 C '<W 3 kM 02 G 3- X «-♦• 3X<;G o r» -1 7 2^ r > W ^ o 3 G-3 o 1#^ * G 3 C 3 G 3" •<3 G 3n*.O 3 X 3 G 3 3 3 mi C i|2 '< M o' O X. M G. (7*^ C 3 o' M n 3 *T3 •- f-** M 3- S C «-ft^ 2 c 3 9 3 3 C - 3 < 3 3 3 3 :r S c 5 1c 0 1 o 2. 7 c G. o-! 'fi -> ’>• n‘c :: 3- C ^ 9- c ^ c i. «-»• •-ft 'X 2. - £ . X c 3 O 3- 3 o Mo nc 3 mi 3c 3^ «M* 5 mi»n 5 ? X C < rj •-I 5 ?3 < E 3 " " ^^ S' ~ Si — D — 5 n 8 ?■ a - 3 ■3 »'• =o ^ 5 X -f -* C Cl. o' 3 5 n IM 3 O 3 3 02 O 3n 7 c 3 G. C^ fT ^ ’< 3 3 3 'X O M M « O O X "3 -1 3- -1 0 c •—• M rr M 5?‘ J-w 3 C O < 35 3* X<«>' 7T 3^ < 'X1 2 2« LL& JK g X o 3 3 C c [p O ? si 2 t s. 6 s 3 3 cz ^ 2 cT o M o Mo £t: ^ O L-. 3 •»*■ 1^ -iX 3 cr 3 3 - cr 3 3 C 3 3 3no o -1 C c 3 I ' ; Xoo “O 3 3 3. 3 Oo c M X a 3 ‘< 3 3, _ 3 *!x '3^ X ' G 3* 02 -1 C 'X "3 -1 02 M 3 3 ?; = - '£ 3 - -?. O X 3 3- 3 ■j W 3 3 3 X. O M G 3 y >-• X 3 m* 7 T5 £. 3 3 O^w r 3 3 G G G 23 X i < i X 3 c M 3 0?■m H 3 3 M 72 0 3.G '■<3 N 3 i 3 *j: c tf'3 5 G mi7M3i w 3 £-3 C M • 3 n c G 3 G cc 0^ 3 0 3X 3 3< G ^ G. ?r G •-*- M 7*-^ M G i I A I? ?' 3 X. G. ? 3 r’ 3 02 3* Xc 3 m o/- / r^ *< CL o M '< c T3 M W 02 M 3 3 c 3 2. G M ’< 3“ X 3 O 3 3 5 G 02 0 — T* LO 3 = 3 »i«* r. 3 X o c V X 3* C 3 —i 3 t ; 3 3 ro 'ji X H 3* X 3 5' »—•• Ei. G -1 ^ >d> 3 “ C 3 G X M 0 3 —ic 3 M X 3 3 p3 !I3 W cZ 3 X I «-► r. C -n/ 'T 3 C 3 Li rr ^ c .5ic c ^ *1 3* - 15 <-i 3*x •X •3 ruc X *3 ma f^ G 3 —i 0^ 0J r-d. C 3 ^ i 0^ <3 ’m0 ■' *3*—» 3*d-3 13 r* X 3 0J 3 •»>c 3 3 ’H 33JG3"t r- <'1 G M .W X 3 x’ X *T3 7‘ or; mJ 3 «—► X X ^1 3 3 G d- 3 S. 7 C 3 C "2^ ?T X M 3 < «u 3 1 / Li 3 C 3 M X Tj C "1r n 3 3 3 M 'ic 3 c 3 Ti 3 r* — 3 — ^ __,3 '3?i^3*13 :3-- X. 3-3 :::" 2. ^ r 3 ^ 7 2 Cl- r 3 ‘ C' 3 3 “ -i X 3-T3*-< d-3 X V*•-^H c’ 3 y 3 3 mJ r- 3 0 EZ t 5‘ 3 ■< IX X r-^ £. 3 3 ’ C 3 X tfl X• 7-3 q!3 w A C 't ;I3 0 3 3 n v;G • 2 ^ J d.n <*3 C • JI G a 3 •~t ffl *-*X X 3 «f- d.rr:• 3 3 J Cu Cu 3r; 2 3 3 C C 2 3 ’C ’< c 3 3n c X wwSl^ vC QC VJ X Cl O 3 3 JBI m o 3 t/5 o 3 > ' •i,-5 3 O 3 ,•' -i' n 3- C n 3- c ro (. / / •-I»-»• T3 3 3 t/5 Q •-I <West< 3n0 g c n &> <r^ IT g c 3 5* 3 X 3- r-r X 0 n* Q X% »u«a. 2. 3 3 G 2- 0* Cc >■*• 3: 0 n 0c 3 W -< c 3 C 72 51 00c •i X n 3- 3 G3 C 00 3 5. 3 V; M < G X l-U *2 3 ’ < 5‘?c' 3 3 7:c c c 0^2:c"5 > 3c X < i£? Q co- 3 3 3 •-I 3 3 c 30 3 3 •2. 5 *-t ••« • r* 3 H > wc d. 3 X > C OTQ 2L 5* 3 V 3 2 s:3t O nc 3 4C. 3 Q 0-^ 3 3 C X 3 5dc 3 3 c 5. -1 V?c Cu 1 3 C “?3 gL 3 72n or;c 3 ncc •M r, G 3 3 3 3 X }' LOc 3 n > 3rs <» tmirn M < 5* ^2. o c :r; ^ 3- 3x» ^ p^ 4:i? ^ 3 3 3 S 5 a ? I^» d- c X. o 3 3 S 3 i. C -1 T3 3:n 3 3 X oc 3 c -t X X 3 X 5 5 n 3 cr* X X C n«<~ 3 tf) X, M • C G -t 3 c 2. X X C -2. or; 3 3 cr. o 3 3 3^ 3 G 1 3. —. 3 ’-' 3 S. 5 2 C c 3 3 -I — < ^ 3 C 3 I >3 3 3 -1 3 ^ 3 r- =5 -- ?£.7 -f 2 ^ i,X -►: c ’< 00cr>. ^ fo CO H wi'$ gain's a § i f i II1 ^ i iCO US O Q "531 S' - ^ I. i^«§a I § i S-^ s # # 3 g- ^ S = o 3-~* • —E.S Ei 'X> \ k«! a. • ,f "• i‘■■#”-< 1 ^ -•JL 'ay CO cn 5g o3 cfl ^ s s. ? 1 S’ ^ *fs5|iff 5S fi. S . '“*“1^3 T2*3''/ &> r3 ?!3 u.c ■-1c 3 y Q n 0*✓Cu cr ^ • #**9* *-t C 3 n 3 0^ -i 3 C n *T3 C X n r. n'3 C L. x ’'X 3 -tc 3 3 3 Ca.J3- •-!✓3 00^ 3-rr.3 •ii**'3 3 X X 2 r/rx 't c 5y C 3*'t t 3 r 3 m>0 3 X 3 r; “T3 < T -1 '/r» &> »-*s•-r. 3* 3 *T3 3 3 n 5 sr 3 C4. 3 •’I C 3- -1 M n c Ci. 3 3 r^r\ C -t 3’ 3 3- •< 3 3 «*• r^ 3- £!n r% D 3 D 3 n c 3 n* 3 i 3 M* 3 0^ r/ C Cuc rc 3- d.’/•3 '<Cu a a %D*;X •Ci« n jar a C/5 3 o S s«^c m c t;-33;c •M1 '<3B 3 0 90 r^ ■«<c B 3*9 Si 0 /G.c c D C 3 O' C <—■ X / r. 3 M 3 -3 -n w X 3 3 •< 3 C- G. C y£ i: 3 r. c 3 n :-• *3 3'^ “5 .y 3 3 fi’ 3T r; ;;l 7^ n 3•J 3 ^ 3 3 :: 5 ^ r; 3 2- 3- C :;? i: 3 f ^ 'I•< — 3 y c ^'^<03 3 < 3 O< 3 c 3 C 5 2 1- r'-n n c/ 3 f'i 3 / 3 /) 3 ^ ^ -j 3 y c ‘r- 3* 3 “ 3 y Lit 2- 2- 3“n 2 C 3 3 3 3 ^ C 3 C y C y 3 Cu 3 3 ? rr: F- y - 2^ S.- c I 5c c vCcc 3 3 M n 2T ■3 Tm "3 r* 3 3* 7^ 3 “3 Cy “3 3 3 C y. C y t; 5y 2, 3" C y •iM * 3 y y C y ST 3 =* J■n C T* c yc <**• 3 3 CL n y C • < y (/»c a- cn 3 3 5* o -1 7: 3 3 yC n C 3* 3€ r ^ r. e: i r_ C *3 O. c 3 3c y c 7 E 3 3 Cu yc O* C y 3 ^ w ^ 3 3 3 3 3 / ^ 3 3 3. “ < T3 M • ^ 5 &■ 3 ~ 5 ** n 5 3 G. -1 *5?5SKr* V" - 4 'i %►Jt*' ii 3" 3 -1 5 2 3 3 3 t; 3 t;c r* 3 3 r'i “3 =! 33.pr- I f r <.7T ^ 3 i. G. 75 O. -• y 3! n “ ^ -r vC 3 3 3 «..»;,z'o *1 3- C 3 in 3: 3 »:i / N C y yc 3 *■«•Q •y n 1^ 3 33 3O 3 N C 3 6 in <2- I O'c 5 ‘ /C cr, C 75 3 3 75 y* 3 3cnc y y 3 •n •< ^ fc»<^ •—3^ n 2: 3 3c 3 Ip^ 0 > :§ < 2 50 C — c > r Z 2 2 rr H r^ • • 3: 33 1 » 7 3 C y/ y 3 y COcx» CO ^ ^ ^ s OO '-J ^ ^ g; ^J s?Tr -j cn CO ft \ P1? 1 « M A If gj ?■ liA ^il * 1 i iFr iim'- t’y. mm wmm% i£ ,JI:>->.ff ■:i I «iiiii^iiiill^^ Executi ^ Director Benjamin F. Wltot Program Administrators Adele Mehta JoAnn M. Kvem Ron Bloch Employment Program Manager Willard Rodeck Harold Anderson Delores Behning Ralph Bennethum Vernon R. Btomgren Margaret Boi^ Jenni Clitty Carolyn Cotton Ethel Danielsen Lorraine Dillon Barb Emery Delores Engman Floyd Engman Kathryn Fleming Elizabeth Fontana Gayle Gage Vivian Grande Avis Greene Frances Hainmerot Eva Haywood Clarence HendncKsen 'iT\m ■■ m-j-....■■- ■VVv ’ Y: ; ■ m • j’ >■•/.; mS Roma H i Violet Jensen BeveilyKauiinanri PfieUSalle Helen Lokken Glen Naze Lorraine Naze Rosella Nelson Jeanette Norton Arthur Olson Herbert Paul Mollie Pesek Carl Severson Frances Smykal Marcus Thompson Inez Tobias Marguerite Uhl Doris ^nMenburg Russell VanValkenburg Glady^e Veilleux Paul Weinblatt Evelyn WiWermuth Anne Wood Senior C enters Catherine M. Bailey Elaine Dorn Joyce Famick SusanneGallus Jean Hillst^om Melinda Kohrt NickiUtke Verda Maidi'iant Paula Miller William Norton UndaOHbgen ^.KrisIneOiluck JoAnne Pav^ Muriel PellZ Stephen Pieh Gail R. Sinkel Susan A.Wilkens Counseling , Case Managemeintt , & Outreach Beverly Abbott Lori Angus Ruth Ann Dobbins Carol Gobar PegKamholz Jacqueline Kes Barbara Lopata Darleen Noreen Lisa J. Thorson Bonnie Webb C ommunity Senior Groups and H i- R ises Rita DeBruyn Melinda Kohrt Paula Miller JoAnne Pavelka Oh ICE Staff Bernadette Weber Audrey Johnson Rosalie Fallat H.O.M.E. Program Elizabeth Crouch Donald V. Hauge Timothy J. Hansen Julie A. Larson Gregory J. Rholl Hazel J. Anderson Robert Bullock Amy B. Christiansen Marian A. Homing Saphrona J. Howell Hedi Johnson Carolyn M. KHby Laura J.Kincannon Martina Larson VickiLLarson Lorraine P. Madcziewski Rosemary C. Wtlyng Margaret A. Murphy Natalie K. Miller Cheryl L Nelson LomeK-Ogren Jean Olson Ibm Reinke Laurie Schmidt Joylene K. Spencer Brenda M. Suronen Senior A ides Gloria Allmon Nancy Reid IP'- Senior Communitv Servos , 1600 2nd Streh S., Hopkins , MN 55343 933*9311 •> h .o.m.e.Program Elizabeth Crouch Donald V. Hauge Timothy J. Hansen Julie A. Larson Gregory J. Rholl Hazel J. Anderson Robert Bullock Amy B. Christiansen Manan A. Homing SaphronaJ. Howell Hedi Johnson Carolyn M. Kilby Laura J.Kincannon Martina Larson Vicki L. Larson Lorraine P Madcziewski Rosemary C. Mitlyng Margaret A. Murphy Natalie K.Mffler Cheryl L Nelson LomeK. Ogren Jean Olson Tom Reinke Laurie Schmidt Joylene K. Spencer Brenda M. Suronen Senior A ides Glona Allmon Nancy Retd The Westonka Senior Center is located in the Westonka Community Services building at 5600 Lynwood Boulevard in Mound. Center Hours are Monday - Friday, 8 am-4 pm.Director: Cathy Bailey Transportation Coordinator:Sue WiikensSenior Outreach: Bev Abbot and Peg Kamholz. Please call us today 472-0347 If you have any questions concerning our Center. We are more than happy to talk to you. Become a Member TodayThough no membership is required for attendance at the Senior Center, we do encourage membership to the Westonka Senior Citizens, Inc. for those who are 55 years of age and over. Membership includes a monthly newsletter, and an investment in the security of a quality senior community.Membership FormName Address City, Zip. Phone Birthday_________________ Month Day Single/ Couple Westonka Senior Citizens, Inc. 5600 Lynwood Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 (612) 472-0347 WestonkaSeniorCenterHome of theWestonka Senior Citizens, Inc.im a place for you B0809iiiw Senior Community Servlcei ,1N 55343 933-9311 ■h WestonkaSeniorCenterHome of theWestonka Senior Citizens, Inc.V •-/1 ^ W.t > i A ^ a place for you iiii Senior Community Servicee 4 The purpose of the Westonka Senior Center is to coordinate and provide activities which enhance self dignity and encourage self development and foster independence in later life.Our aim is to present a program broad enough that it will offer something to everyone.The Senior Center is a place where everyone is welcome, especially those 55 and over. It is a place where you remain visible and involved with the community.... a place to have a quality retirement. The Westonka Senior Center started In 1981 with funds from the Metropolitan Council's Program on Aging and with funds from the Older Americans Act. The sponsorship of the Center has grown to include the four funding cities of Minnetrista, Mound, Orono, and Spring Park, Westonka School District #277, Senior Community Services, Volunteers of America, and the Westonka Senior Citizens, Inc. The Senior Center is a place for...DININGEnjoy a tasty, nutritional dinner provided by Volunteers of America. A suggested donation of $1.50 per meal, or what you can afford. No one will be denied for lack of donation. Reservations should be made two working days in advance. To reserve a spot call 472-0347.TRANSPORTATIONTransportation, to and from, is provided for the center, grocery shopping, medical appointments, special events, personal errands, and Sunday worship services. Call 472- 0349, Monday-Friday 9:30 am to 2 pm, for arrangements. EDUCATION Various educational courses are provided. Classes are fun and provide a good social setting. Included are offerings in art, crafts, defensive driving, cable TV., and humanities. HEALTH Enjoy our "Over .50 and Fit" excerise program, blood pressure screening, annual Health Fair, and additional health educational programs. SENIOR OUTREACHProviding outreach counseling and case management. We will assist seniors and/ or their families in obtaining the needed services. Cali 472-6499 for assistance.RECREATIONThere are plenty of opportunities to take a trip, see a play, attend our parties and special events, or take the time to chat and get to know other seniors in the community.SENIOR GIFT SHOPUse your talents in making crafts, and earn extra income by selling them in our Senior Gift Shop. Open Monday- Wednsday-Friday, 10 am to 4 pm. SERVICES Tax assistance, fuel assistance, financial assistance, information and referral and advocacy is available in our building. VOLUNTEERING Become a volunteer and help our center remain one Ihe best in the state. Opportunities for volunteering include receptionist, host, gardener, fund raiser, friendly visitor, and driver. Jl VOL. E ©SIKlTgl^ HI-NOTE8 NO. 11 NOVEMBER 1992 HOME OF THE WESTONKA SENIOR CITIZENS. INC • 5600 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD • MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364 (61?) 472 0347 PRESIPt'WT'S MESSAGE Afiz yoa i>xX.z^z^tzd in ijouA 4-Co^e 0(J o^^-iceA^ and cxcclc C luc boa/^ mmbeJU ^oA 1993? A az you MeAzited -in bav-i:ig a vo-icz >c»t >oie^ 4e.£ecaoii? ATie you go-iny -to votz -in cuA CcuwVuf t gzno>>al p-Uction. u)ludi>u the. Aome daij cu> ouK mmb^A6lvip mee^>tg and eZcct^on? OuA mecXutg tuctc ue ^ thz ^oAmzA timz o] 1:00 p.m. ^oUouiing lunch. Vou can zat lunch uuMi uA, (loe'd lovz to have you) then go to thz membzAslUp mzztoig and vote toA youA ^aooAi-tz candidatzi, thzn go and ootz ^oA thz cand-idatz o^ youA choACZ ^fiow thz local tzvzl on up to pAzi-iuznt. Maybe a pAxyzx oa txeo oa you moTiiz youA batlot, -i^ you oaz so -inctenzd, might hzlp a Cottlz tn thzbc tAoublzd timzs. FCzasz be assuAzd that this SznioA C-Uizzns oAganlzation exists ioA alt 0(5 you. Wc tikz to bzlizvz ~ no, ivz know - tJiat wz o^^zA something /{oA zvzAtjonzi but wz would sinezAzly likz youA Input. It/hat moAZ can wz do? Let us know! I ahoays thought I was a good mothzA. Wz o^^zAzd a good clean home, good \ood, clean clothes, hzlp with schoolwoAk and spools pAog-yms, Sunday Sdwol, constAuctlve nagging. So -bnag.inz my diagAin when I had to apoZogoZZ Azczntly to my tvo healthy suns ^oa toying to undziminz the^ health ftAom baby to manhood! 0 yes, I am guilty. I -taught them to douik m-^k! Up uivtLt CL tvccitA CLQO i,i)hzn tht 6liocliing ncw6 about nUtk ccimc out, I thought l*d done such a good job. Well, as I say, I did apologize, and 1 hope you mU all Rollon) my example and assuAz youA childAzn tiiat you ate albo iooxy. They say ignoAanez -is no excuse, bat -iH this case I beiizve it is and I'm suAz youA kJ.ds will ^otgive you. And AemznbzA: It used to be tiiat death and taxes alone weoz in evitable. Wow) thzAz's shipping ojid handling! VoAis LeGault, PAesident Novembeo - 1992 I. 1 i I#• w • »•r V \\ mmIII iMii MliliHC Mi mi\RKM nnw ntiK 9 • r « -4^ I aiiS^SiLs •miiip lTlH»iRAM Rnw m miiifl PAI rNHAR OF F_VENTS FOR NOVEMBEJl I.INF, DANCINC HUMDAY** NUV 2. TULSDAYa MUV. iU t> 17tli **NoLe change - Fills is Llie second half of our Une Danciug class and we've been having ,i hlasLl dote the one change Lo a Monday because of Lhe meeLing day. IIO|'e Lhls will noL cause a problem. You may sLlil take a class For $2.50 a session. WliSiONKA SFNIOK CITIZENS, INC. MEETING DAY TUESDAY, NOVEMliER 3rd_ _ _ _ _ __ 9:00 Executive Board Meeting 11 - 12 Post Office Hours - Our local Mound Post Office will provide package services and you can buy stamps, m.ilL packages & letters, etc. 12:00 Noon meal - make reservations by noon on Irltlay, OcLobei 30th. 1:00 Business meeting - NOTl. - Change back tt> origlvial time! This meeting is extremely Important to attend when you cast your votes for your 1993 leadership. The slate as presented in October is; President - Doris LeGault Vice President Leonard Kopp Charles Nungesser Secretary Gladys .lohnson Treasurer Vera Bee Directors - 2 year Gayle O'Brien Ev Brekke Leona Peterson Dorothy Rauschendorfer Luciile Ekberg Theres.i Gauvln Margaret Mattson THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 5 - 8:30 to 2:30 SENIOR health FAIR See the enclosed page in this news letter for complete details. . . . THURSDAY, NOVEMBER (> & 20th SENIOR DISCUSSION CROUP_ _ _ _ _ This group has readied its maximum, but liopefuily Lliere will be another session. Watcli the newsletter for tlie next dates or let Cathy know you migiit be interested in taking part. The group combines dis cussion topics, sliared experiences, support .imi friendship. The facilitator. Peg Kamlioir,, establishes a comfortable atmos phere in which tiie members can talk, listen, laugh and learn together. MON. TilRU SAT. NOVEMBER 9 thru Uth, 10 - HOLIDAY BOUTIQUE * GIFT SHOP OPEN HOUSE Be sure to stop in Lo our Gift Shop for a cup of spiced tea and holiday cookie; Handmade gift items are a real winner for your families. We will even let you say, "1 made this just for uou!" Let peo|)le who work know that we'll be open on Sat urday, November lAth. MONDAY - FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 9 thru 13th HESTONKA RIDES FUNDRAISING WEEK_ _ _ _ _ E.'icli ye.'ir we dedicate one week of our fund raising Lo help keep our tr.inspor- Lation iirogram going. With nearly 700 members, just a few hours from each of yon would imt US over the Lop for Lhls fund raiser. We'll provide Lhe tre.'iLs ,nnd fellowship if you can share your time. Anyone can help - Just be able to count to 10 and put Lhe items in bags.. Let's really put our effort into this fundraising event! FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 13 - 10 to 10:30 WOMEN'S CANCER ISSUES_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Local volunteer. Fern Kubolsky, will be conducting this impoil.int session on cancer issues especially for women. Pleaiu come andbring your friends. llianks, lein, for sharing your time and expertise with us. pAqe rvi .t:. VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA SENIOR DINING PROGRAM for NOVEMBER - 1992MONDAYBaked Meatloaf Mashed Potato/Gravy Carrot Slices 7-Grain Bread Rice Pudding/Topping Milk 2u. Vegetable Beef Stew Warmed Corn bread Gceamy ..Coles law Pear Sauce Milk r'f! TUESDAYSweet/Sour Pork Ribletlater TotsSteamed Spinach Bran Bread Peach Sauce Milk 3. Potato Chowder/ Crackers Turkey Sandwich/Lettuce Whole Wheat Bun Apple Juice Cherry Pie IMilk 10. Chicken ala King Baking Powder Biscuit Broccoli Cuts Spiced Apple Rings Strawberry Mousse Milk _ _16. Salisbury Steak Baked Potato/Marg. Pickled Beets Honey Nut & Oat Bread Vanilla Pudding/ Topping 23. Swiss Steak/Tomatoes Parlsey Potatoes Mixed Vegetables 12-Grain Bread Tropical Fruit Cup Milk BBQ Pork Riblet Scalloped Potatoes Winter Squash 7-Crain Bread Applesauce Milk 30. THANKSGIVING MEAL Sliced Turkey Bread Dressing Mashed Potatoes/Gravy Wliole Cranberry Sauce Whole Wheat Roll Pumpkin Pie/Topping, Mnu WEDNESDAY THURSDAYNorwegian Salmon/Lemon Baby Red Potatoes Creamed Peas OR: T.\C0 SALAD/SAUCE Rye Bread Frosted Lemon Cake Milk _ _ _ 4. Oven Baked Chicken Potato Latkes Diced Beets Stone Ground Bread Fruited Gelatin/ Topping Milk Pork Chow Mein Chow Mein Noodles Steamed Rice Soy Sauce Pineapple Ring Salad/ Lettuce Almond Cookie Milk 18 S.R SLICED HAM Au Gratin Potatoes Lite 3-Bean Salad Crusty Roll Birthday Cake Milk Seasoned Chicken Breast Fillet Baked Potato/Margarine Corn O'Brien 12-Grain Bread Old Fashion Molasses Cookie Milk 5. Swedish Meatballs Mashed Potatoes/Gravy Stewed Tomatoes 7-Grain Bread Butterscotch Pudding/ Topping Milk FRIDAYItalian Spaghetti/ Meat Sauce Parmesan Cheese Green Beans Tossed Salad/Dressing Egg Bread Fresh Grapes Milk 6. Scalloped Potato and Ham California Vegetables Bran Muffin OR: CHEF SALAD/DRESSI^ Frosted Brownie Milk 13. Cabbage Rolls/Tomato Sauce Wax Beans OR: COTTAGE CHEESE FRUIT PLATE Whole ITlieat Roll Chocolate Meringue Pie Milk 19. THANKSGIVING CEHTF31 CIDSED Hot Roast Beef Sand wich Mashed Potato/Gravy Carrot Slices Fruited Gelatin/ Topping Milk 20. HOLIDAY! ! CALENDARY OF EVENTS CONTINUED . . . . FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 13 - 5:00 P.M. POT LUCK AND CARDS Be sure to sign up by 3:00 p.m. to have a place set for you. Bring something to share and enjoy what others bring. Stay for cards after dinner if you like • • • TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17 - 8:30 A.M. VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA THANK YOU BREAKFAST_ _ _ _ _ _ __ The Volunteers of America will host this Thank Kou for ail of you who help provide our noon meals - the cooks, the hosts, the receptionists, the money counters, the decorators, tlie birthday committee and our bank courier. Please consider yourselves invited and we hope youall can come. But-Please sign up by Friday, Nov 13 so we can order tl:e food! We appre ciate all that you do to keep our dining going! You are a great group!! Thanks at Thanksgiving time!! TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17 - 2:00 P.M. SHOPPING TRIP TO TARGET-CREATLAND Our bus will take us to Plymouth to visit this new store - should be kind of fun. Cost is $2.00. We hope to gather up all of you shoppers and offer trips around town. If you have ideas - let us know! WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 18 - 12:00 "WESTONKA ESTATES" DAY We will be inviting our friends from Westonka Estates to come and Join us on this day. We hope to see old friends and meet some new ones. We would like to see many of them return as regulars. WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 18 - 1:30 P.M. B- - -0 _ A chance to have a little fun and fellowship. Popcorn and other re freshments will be available. Come and bring your friends. THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 19 - 2 to 3:30 P.M. MEDICA/SF:NT0R cake INFOKMATIONAI. MEETING A representative from this HMO will be here to explain the plan aml/or answer questions about Medicare and the need for supplemental policies. TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 24 - 12:00 THANKSGIVING DINNER _ _ _ _ This will be our chance to celebrate the holiday at our Center and to give thanks for all the good things that have been blessed us duing the past year. WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25th - 12:00 NOVEMBER BIRTHDAY PARTY _ _ _ _ For those of you lucky enough to be born in November, you will definitely be celebrating it up In style with our Thanks giving dinner on Tuesday, a birthday party on Wednesday and your own dinner on Thursday Hope you will be able to attend. Look In this issue for your names and Invitation. . THURSDAY, FRIDAY - NOVEMBER 26 & 27th THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Tl»e Center will be closed both days in observance of this wonderful Ijoliday of thanksgiving. MONDAY, NOVEMBER 30 - 1:30 to 4:00 PAINTED HOLIDAY TABLE KUHNER/PILLOW Create a unique table runner to add d festive touch to your home or to give as a gift during the holidays. Use iron-on transfers and paints to create your lioliday design. Supply fee (payable to Instructor) no more than i?l5.50. Cost of instruction - $8.00. Instructor will be our own Orvella Hanbon. THANK?;THANKS To Rita and Porkle Burton for answering our plea for a hand vacumn for our bus! We appreciate your gift!! HOSTS/HOSTESSES AND RECEPTIONIST SCHEDULE FOR NOVEKiBER - 1992MONDAYHOSTS:J. STROMSTAD/G CARLSO^ D.W. B. STRONG TUESDAYHOSTS:H. EBERT/B. STRONG D.W. TOM SINCHEFF A.M, DORIS LEGAULT P.M. KVA.i.1 HOSTS: D & P RAUSCHENDORFER D.W. B. STRONG RECEPT: A.M. MICHI ROKUTANI P.M. DORIS MYHRE HOSTS: L MILLER/L LAMPHIER D.W. B. STRONG A.M. DORIS LEGAULT P.M. ANNA KVAAL orrcTJT• V .. k- - A.M. MARG. MATTSON P.M. JUNE RUDE WEDNESDAYHOSTS:A. & M. M\ZI.ARK.\ D.W. E. ERICKSON prrpp'T . A.M. BERNICE PUTT P.M. LIE GUSTAFSON HOSTS: E. BREKKE/V. AASEN D.W. E BREKKE/D DAVIS RECEPT: A.M. LEONA PETERSON P.M. LU PERRY HOSTS: E & G. TAYLOR D.W. M. GARVAIS A.M. MARG. MATTSON P.M. CORA LANGE HOSTS: D. & R. WESTMAN D.W. B. STRONG RECEPT: A.M. D RAUSCHENDORFER P.M. DELORES BODE THURSDAYHOSTS:V ANDEREGG/E ERICKSON D.W. D. DAVIS RECEPT: A.M. W. GILBERTSON P.M. FLO JENSEN FRIDAYHOSTS:BOB & BETTY WALLIN D.W. G. HEINRICK RECEPT: A.M. VERA BEE P.M. MABLE BELT HOSTS: M. SOHNS/D. DAVIS D.W. E. ERICKSON RECEPT: A.M. PHYLLIS ORN P.M. GLADYS JOHNSON HOSTS: B. & M. GAUDETTE D.W. E. ERICKSON A.M. BERNICE PUTT P.M. DOTTIE MEIER HOSTS: M.SWANSON/L. DAHL D.W. TOM SINCHEFF RECEPT: A.M. JO SODERLUND P.M. LU PERRY HOSTS: M RIES/M MONTEITH/ D.W. E. ERICKSON RECEPT: A.M. ELLEN SCHOLER P.M. GLADYS JOHNSON HOSTS: F ANDERSON/L TOU^sER D.W. BETTY STRONG RECEPT: A.M. DORIS LEGAULT P.M. ANNA KVAAL HOSTS: L. SMITH/L. BRYCE D.W. D. DAVIS HOSTS: ►l. BELT/E. JENSEN D.W. G HEINRICK/DAVIS RECEPT: A.M. PEG STOCKSTEAD P.M. MARTI ISAACS HOSTS: ART & IRM/\ JAEKLE D.W. D. DAVIS A.M. EV HAARSTICK P.M. THERESA GAUVIN THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY —‘ Sir p! \:v^ • III RECEPT; A.M. JO SODERLUND P.M. BARB FLOEDER OSTS: P STOCKSTEAD/E BEECROFT D.W. G. HEINRICK A.M. VERA BEE P.M. DOTTY O'BRIEN CENTER IS CLOSED.. i WESTONKA SENIOR CITIZEN FOUNDATION UPDATE Gifts received as of October I6th: In memory of Emily Platen from - Lucille Bryce - Agnes & Del Pfeifer - Dot and Don Davis - Anna Kvaal In memory of Neil Higus from - Art & Margaret Maziarka In memory of John O'Brien's Birthday - from LaVerne & Dick Williams In memory of Roy Jensen from - June Messlck - Dee Hodges - Betty Strong - Bernice Putt - Virginia Keefe - Mary Evanoff - Westonka Sr. Citizens, Inc. - Elizabeth & Glen Pagel - Evelyn Haarstlck - Toni Sincheff - Phyllis & Bud Orn - Rose Hjelmhaug - John & Julie Elam - Mr & Mrs Edward Tribble - Les & Charlotte Jensen “ Robert & Virginia Martin - Mr & Mrs Charles Lange - Sylvia Jones - Ella Jane Clirlstenson - Eugene & Carol Faaberg - Elwood & Sally Uner - Adell Stoddart - John & Lois Jensen - Walter & Margaret Engstom' - Rony & Carol Harrison Harrison Enterprises - Leo & Lorraine Leuer - Ethel Markel - Steve & Mary Twltchell - Ralph & Beverly Jensen - Donald Jensen - Betty Munz - Mr & Mrs H. A. Solstad Forest Jostrum - Linnea Fred in - Mr & Mrs S.B. Korapelein - Carolyn J. Demcak In Honor of Herb Pauly's lOOth from: - Dotty O'Brien - Betty Strong - LaVerne & Dick Williams - Mary DeVinney - Bernie & Mary Malcheski - George & Michi Rokutani - Anna Kvaal - Art & Margaret Maziarka - Mary Ellen Church - Agnes & Del Pfeifer - Millie & Henry Paumen - Toni Sincheff - Phyllis & Bud Orn - Don & Dot Davis - Chuck & Dorothy Prestidge - Bert & Fran Larson - Marvel Rice - Lucille Bryce With a wish for Hllma Susag's Speedy Recovery - from Virginia Keefe In honor of Ron Bostrom's retirement - from Dotty O'Brien In Honor of Emma Brandenberg's 80th Birthday - from Agnes & Del Pfeifer Matching Gift to Roger & Dorothy Westman's - from U. S. West Foundation In Honor of Catherine & Norman Voorliees 50th Wedding Anniversary from; - Dotty O'Brien - Mary & Bernie Malcheski Leo & June Slechta - Doc & Dottl Meier - Art & Margaret Maziarka In gratitude for his lOOtli party and to those who helped to put It on from Herb Pauly In memory of Don Kopplln at Tlianks- giving from - Babe Kopplin In memory of Jolm Flynn from - Katherine Flynn In memory of Bill Guide - Helene Gulden ?a9e f. foundation updatc continued Gifts given thus far for the 1992 Fund Drive are: FOUNDERS CLUB m . Russ 6. Geri Pehle In honor of Herb Pauly's 100th Birthday Pat Daly " Linus. & Evangeline Fasching - Eileen Erickson ~ Evelyn Ebert - Lem & Edith Sprow - Phyllis Manente in memory of Ray A. Manente VISIONARIES CLUB - Gene Rundell - Willard & Myrt Hillier in memory of Harold Peterson - Muriel Kolar in memory of Bob Kolar - Ron & Joy Grundeen in memory of Luther Anderson SUPPORTERS CLUB - Susan Gail Navratil - Louise Smith in memory of Emory Smith *WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER II - 7:30 A.M. grand casino - HINCKLEY- - - - - -- (Sorry this is out of sequence!) Our sponsoring agency. Senior Community Services is offering this trip as a fund raiser. The cost of §5.00 includes coach bus and a free buffet ticket (or you can use it for $5.00 cash). Sign up quickly as this bus will fillup fast! Defensive Driving continued .... the certified Instructor and course mater ials and refreshments. If you wish to dine on those days, you*II have to make reservations on your cwn!! Two days in advance, please. WESTONKA RIDES TUESDAYS - OCT 27 thru DEC 22nd 9:30 - 11:30 A.M. HOT.TDAY COOKING CLASS WeCan will be offering another course for Holiday cooking taught by pro fessionals from the U of M Extension Service. There is no charge for the class due to a grant from the Medtronlcs Foundation. Brochures about the sessions are at the desk or ask Cathy for info. With winter just around the corner, the Westonka Rides Program, which offers its service to senior and non-senior citizens alike, is seeking volunteer drivers using their own cars to assist with the surge of requests that come at this time of year f.or transportation to medical appointments. Westonka Rides needs your help in order to meet this Increased demand for rides. DEFENSIVE DRIVING CLASS WED & THHRS—DEC. 2 & 3rd - 8:00 - 12:00 This will be our last class until spring. Completion of the course will entitle you to a 10% discount for 3 years on your auto insurance. Cost for this class is $16.00 which includes - (Continued in next column) Page * Please consider volunteering just a few hours a month as a driver. In return, we offer mileage reimbursement and most im portantly, a rewarding opportunity to help chose in your community who are without means of transportation to get to their needed medical appointment. We welcome those of you with a - - Class B license as well, to help drive our van either for medical appointments or for Sunday morning worship services. Why not share a little of your time with us by being a Volunteer Driver? For more information, call Susan — 472—03^9 - A.mm HAPPY BIRTHDAY 1/23 1/15 1/15 11/05 11/U 11/01 11/18 11/23 11/03 11/10 11/07 11/18 11/02 11/28 11/02 11/28 11/30 11/12 11/03 11/18 11/16 11/22 11/11 11/15 11/06 11/05 11/08 • Vivian Aasen Anna Anderson Frieda Behmler Thelma Benson Charles Bergmann Irene Bersie Bob Byrnes Dora Darling Alvin Donahoo Harry Dongoske Norma Drawert Lucille Ekberg Erling Eklof Eleanor Fairbanks Emil Fischer Vera Frahm _ Fae Gabrlelson Gene Geyen James Gotbman Shirley Gould Violet Gustavson Clarence Hanson Martha Isaacs Shorty Jackson Charlotte Jensen Margaret Juettner Joan Kust 11/19 11/16 11/05 11/05 11/06 ll/ll 11/30 11/30 11/15 11/11 11/12 11/03 11/21 11/17 11/17 11/12 11/14 11/02 11/04 11/28 11/05 11/23 11/16 11/01 11/24 11/20 11/19 I YOU ARE INVITED: ^ To all you November Birthday Celebrants - this is ^ your invitation to the birthday luncheon at noon * on Wednesday, November 25th. Please sign up early I for lunch that day and ask the Receptionist to put f a "B" by your name. That way our birthday Crew J knows how many they must be prepared for. HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU ALL! WELE0ME^ New Members! Pearl Lang Leona Leighton Phyllis Linden Bernie Malcheski Marlene McIntyre Elaine McRalth Maryan Monteith Evelyn Moravec Ted Nafstad Cliff Pearson George Poikonen Paul Rauschendorfer Marvel Rice Anna Riewe Lillian Rosenstiel Fran Scherber Ardelle Skoglund Janet Stromstad Barb Theisen Don Thomas Ruby Ulku John Uner Lu Ward Richard Williams Elizabeth Wilson Neal Wilson Helen Yira T N M E M 0 R I U M Roij L. Jc»i4en OuA njinpCLtliic^ to Van Jaiicn in the death hcA huthand, Roij. LOST AUV FOim Nancy and Ron Gramenz Marilyene Grundmeler Jean Rough Eileen and Walter Lanz Dale Linnenkamp lEthel Nelson Will & Phyllis Johnson Don & Carol Thomas Someone te,it a u/kitc Su’catel at the Centei. and A Fot'ding Wine Cofuied Umbnetta and one btue Umbietta loLth a white ihepheAd' i cfiouk handte. Ptease efaun at Centei. Taae f h- Just a reminder about 1993 Dues! The cost Is for Individual or _ _ a couple. This entitles vou to tlie monthly newsletter and a reduction in some costs. The calendar year tor dues is from January thru Deceinher with payment <lue $6.00 for trip before FEBRUARY ISl. If yon haven't paid yet you may use tlie form beli>w and hrini' To the center. Please enclose a self-addressed - stamped envelopeIt In or mail it if you wish us to mall your membership card and receipt. ^ Onr "Snow Birds" may wish to pay now before tliese leave for those Sunnier Climes! WESTONKA SENIOR CITIZENS, INC. 1993 NAME ADDRESS APT if PHONE BIRTHDAY Month Day only SPECIAI. TALENTS OR INTERESTS I would like more information on becoming Involved as a volunteer at the Center In: FUND RAISING (MEISEL ROOM) __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ VOLUNTEER DRIVER - - - - - - -- HOSTS RECEPTIONISTS PROGRAM COMMITTEE TRAVEL COMMITTEE BIRTHDAY PARTY COMMITTEE COMPUTER ENTRY GIFT SHOP SALES OTHER WESTONKA SENIOR CITIZENS, INC. MEMBERSHIP 1993 NAME ADDRESS APT If PHONE BIRTHDAY Month Day only SPECIAL TALENTS OR INTERESTS I would like more information on becoming involved as a volunteer: FUND RAISING(MEISEL ROOM)VOLUNTEER DRIVER RECEPTIONIST HOSTS PROGRAM COMMITTEE TRAVEL COMMITTEE BIRTHDAY PARTY COMMITTEE COMPUTER ENTRY GIFT SHOP SALES OTHER Pl«s. US. two forms tor couples - or give the extr.n form to s friend to Join. Td,e /o --**^ : U ____ - •-5»(J 04^ s: '^^aCcCA^ (3c/Uf(yL. //^ ^y7^cc^ (*•, VimS 1 j,. ''•*^6ua.^, r:'tL ^Sc. />t^ Z:o^ y^. - ^^tSS4>t^t - ^^^'sccn .Au. ^ ^/Ce^ y^ ^:3o~ //•'SO //. 3a- /2:3e /Z * 3^ ■* /•* /.*/-o - X:^c - '^^aA/t eessieiof - <7/^ C&s^ \-^t>ct.Ae> A /l^ d^AJL, ^^iToA-ALJ^CSr) T^e SCt^ ^£yzc£^ :/7/e, ^cAC6e \7ill,, t:t»r\a^cc/n A^cc7€-i7ey^ ^ 3 4/f^ /t^i y/uc^ S<€A>7 <x^i!* ^ "^«9« H WESTONKA SENIOR CENTER Ill-NO'lES Published monthly by Weatonka Senior Citizens, Inc. 5600 Lynwood Boulevard Mound MN 5536A Editor; hotly O'Brien Telephone: A72-03A7 Senior Center Director Catliy Bailey - A72-03AU Westonka Rides Coordinator Susan Wllkens - A72-03A9 i ■m * \ A ■! WESTONKA SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER WESTONKA SCHOOL DIST. 277 5600 LYNWOOD BLVD MOUND MN 5536A Mon PfofU Ory. U S. Postage PAID Permit S51 Mound, MN 55364 m ^WimiimmMrn mL f j ¥ VOLUNTEERING Volunteers warm Tamarack Senior Center. At this time of dropping temf atures, it is good to pause and feel the warmin of volunteers in action. This warmin radiates at the Tamarack Sonior Center every day we are open. Receptionists, servers, the clean-up crew, hosts and hostesses, drivers, advisory board and our crafters bring the center to life and create an inviting place to meet old friends and to make new friends. Thanks to all these people wn.o volunteer. The Center provides programs, meals, education, exercise and friendship throuphout the year. It could not be accomplished without our volunteers. Pat yourselves on the back!! HOW DO WE GET FROM HERE TO THERE? Van service makes the Tamarack Senior Center accessible to people who live in Long Lake. Medina, Orono, Wayzata and the southwest corner of Plymouth. The van picks up passengers at their homes. Riders contribute towards the service. The 12-passenger van is equipped with a wheelchair lift. Besides rides to the center, the transportation program also provides rides for shopping and appointments on Monday afternoons. Drivers of the van must take D passenger assistance course, pass a physical, fiave an excellent driving record, and take a test to become certified/ WHY? ASK WHY? What difference does the Tamarack Senior Center make? In a recent Ann Landers column, she said the ultimate poverty is loneliness. The Tamarack Senior Center provides a place where people can get together to learn, laugh, talk, share ideas, play games, eat with others, and have fun. How do we serve the community? The Tamarack Senior Center is a starting point for services for the elderly. The older population is the fastest growing segment in Hennepin County. With this growing number of older adults in the community, the iinpc.1c.nce of the Tamarack Senior Center increases each year. UPCOMING EVENTS Watch for these planneu events at the Tamarack Senior Center: BLOOD PRESSURE SCREENINGS ■ Nov. 3 and Dec. 1 at 12:30 p.m. FLU IMMUNIZATIONS & HEARING SCREENINGS - Oct. 27 55ALIVE MATURE DRIVING COURSE - Nov. 17 and 24 THANKSGIVING & CHRISTMAS Parties Nov. 24 and Dec. 22. TAMARACK SENIOR CENTER 133 SOUTH BROWN ROAD LONG LAKE. MN 55356 476-2554 Open Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays 1992 Six-Months Review TAMARACK SENIOR CENTER A Program of Senior Community Services Serving Long Lake, Medina and Orono Coordinator's Notes The current older adult peer group is living longer and retiring earlier than previous cohorts. They are paving the way for future generations in lifestyles and services geared toward fulfilled retirement years including: housing, medical care, living arrangements, and transportation. This group of individuals are excellent role models for future generations. They have a desire to serve the community. They form caring and giving friendships. They know themselves. They are a vital source of wisdom and experience. They are our living cultural and historical roots. CHALLENGES Nonprofit organizations continually face the number one challenge of fundraising. The Tamarack Senior Center benefits from a generous and caring community. Contributors to Tamarack’s general operating budget include: City of Long Lake, City of Medina, City of Orono, Long Lake Fire Department, Hamel VFW Women's Auxiliary, Orono Lions, Long Lake Staie Bank, St. George Catholic Church, Trinity Lutheran Church, Calvin Presbyterian Church, and private individuals. The participants of the center have raised money through craft sales, bake sales, raffles and dinners. JUST THE FACTS 1st Half of 1992 Average daily attendance • 30 people 2106 Lunches served. 729 Rides provided on center van. 39 Educational events have been held. 47 Pocreational enents have been held. 62 Health-related events have been held (health talks, health screenings and exercise classes) Over 50 retired people are involved as volunteers for the center ’s program and projects. TAMARACK LUNCH REVIEW Lunch at Tamarack Senior Center is a great place to meet new people, see friends, or become reacquainted with ** Ambience **** Value *** Quality **** Service neighbors. The atmosphere is amiable, informal, and relaxing. You can ’t beat the price. The center asks for donations from $1.75 to $2.90 Volunteers o' America pluns a monthly menu of well-balanced meals. The chicken dinners are the favorite with the lunch-time crowd. The three types of chicken are equally well liked- barbecue, baked and country style. The meatballs, eitner Swedish of sweet and sour, are always flavorful. Some lunch guests always come when fish is the main entree. The fish is ilaky and delicious. All meals are served with coffee, milk and bread. Service is maintained by friendly volunteers from the community, always making sure your coffee cup is full. Regular guests say they come for the food, but stay for the fun. Lunch is served at noon on Tuesdays, Thursdays ar.j Fridays. To make luncheon reservations, call 476-2554 two working days in advance. October, 1992 7 % % MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL ^ HELD OCTOBER 12, 1992 <P ROLL % The Council met on the above date with the following members present: Acting Mayor J. Diann Goetten, CounciI members Gabriel Jabbour, Edward Callahan and Mary Butler. Mayor Barbara Peterson was absent. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, City Attorney Thomas Barrett, City Engineer Glenn Cook and City Recorder Teri Naab. Acting Mayor Goetten called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. (IM ) HAZARDOUS BUILDINGS ASSESSMENT - PUBLIC H^^ARING 7:00 - 7:05 P.M. Moorse explained the public hearing Is regarding assessments against properties related to hazardous building action. JoEllen Hurr asked why the City is paying half of the legal fees incurred. Moorse explained the hazardous building procedure was long and leading toward a court proceeding, which would have meant additional legal fees. The City, as part of a settlement with the property owners, offered to pay half of the legal fees to avoid a court battle. The amount the City will pay is $10,226. CONSENT AGENDA Goetten remo'/ed Item #14 from the Consent Agenda. Butler added Items #5 and 6. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 4, nays 0. Motions for all items adopted by consent agenda will be included in the minutes in their respective .lumerical order. (*#2) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the CouncII he Id on September 28, 1992. Ayes 4, nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 12, 1992 PUBLIC COMMENTS Goetten announced the dedication of the Kelley Parkway on October 14th has been postponed because of the untimely death of Mary KeI ley. (#3) #1621 TERRY JOHNSON, 1045 LINDEN LANE - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3186 Mr. and Mrs. Terry Johnson were present. Gaffron explained the applicants originally submitted their proposal over a year ago. Since then, there have been many changes to the proposal. The applicants propose the removal of an existing detached garage to be replaced by an attached garage and a driveway. They also propose a new deck and a second story addition over the existing residence. This proposal results in the following hardcover percentages: 0-75’ reduction from 8.9% to 7.2%; 75-250’ Increa'-e from 22.1% to 40.5%; and a reduction in the 250-500’ zone. He clarified that the applicants intend to keep the wall and sidewalk system un the northwest corner of the house, but noted that it is built with wooden cribbing containing non-compacted gravel, that only the cribbing is considered hardcover, and the square footage of existing walkway hardcover is equivalent to the amount reported for replacement. Mr. Johnson stated they need to keep this system for drainage purposes. Gaffron reported the Planning Commission’s main concern was the steep lot and the amount of run-off funneled toward the lake. He stated the ( ty Engineer had reviewed the property that day. Cook recommended the City condition approval on the applicants maintaining the drainageway in a manner that prevents erosion. Goetten asked if Cook felt the situation. new proposal helps the drainage Cook noted the renovation will channelize the drainage and will increase the velocity of that run-off. Goetten asked who is responsible if the improvements on property aggravate the drainage problem in the area. the Cook stated the City should make it known it is the responsibility of the property owner to correct any future drainage problems. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 12, 1992 ZONING FILE #1621 - CONT. Gaffron noted staff has discussed a retention pond somewhere on the property or elsewhere in the neighborhood, which may be realized at a later date. Goetten clarified the applicants Intend to use foundation and asked if that foundation has been certified by a structural engineer. the existing inspected and Mr. Johnson stated prior to purchasing the property, they had a contractor visit the site who indicated, because of the 12“ block used, the foundation could support a second story. Goetten explained that if the foundation is found to be unusable, the City wi I I require the house to be moved further back on the property. Callahan said the Planning Commission felt the driveway would focus a major amount of water In a different location. He said he hesitates allowing double the amount of hardcover within the 75- 250’ zone. Butler felt, after review of the property, it is a very awkward property and the applicants have a hardship for moving the garage closer to the house. She agreed the driveway may create a river on the property. Mr. Johnson stated the run-off actually flows across the propert> opposed to down the drive. He added, by decreasing the amount of hardcover at the actual point of the water entering the property, it will allow for better absorption. Jabbour suggest they consider a small landing area or borm at the top of the drive to prohibit water from Linden Lane entering the property. Gaffron noted Cook has recommended a 3% side-to-side slope for the driveway to help direct run-off to the sides rather than down the length of the driveway. Goetten agreed with Callahan that they b.iould not allow the applicants to double the amount of hardcover within a zone. She said she would prefer the existing garage to remain in Its present location opposed to the new garage. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 12, 1992 ZONING FILE #1621 - CONT. Jabbour felt this property is a good example of the DNR’s ntent to allow a certain percentage of hardcover on a property within 1000’ of the lake opposed to a certain percentage within different zones. He felt the problem is the need for such a long driveway, but noted the house is of modest size. Jeff Johnson noted the Planning Commission felt the biggest Impact of this project being the off-site drainage concern, and they felt if there is a chance to improve that situation, it is more important than the hardcover issue. Mr. Johnson felt they were actually improving the drainage situation for their neighbors. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution #3186 for Application #1621 for Terry Johnson, 1045 Linden Lane, for variances to construct an attached garage and additions to the existing residence, subject to the applicant being informed prior to the issuance of a building permit of the City Engineer’s recommendations. Ayes 3, nays 1. Goetten voted nay. Barrett suggested adding the following language to the resolution, "as recommended by the City Engineer or as may be required by the City Engineer in the future". This will ensure the ability by the City Engineer to monitor the situation in the future. Butler accepted the Attorney’s suggestion, Jabbour seconded the amendment. Ayos 3, nays 1. Goetten voted nay. Mrs. Johnson asked if they would have any recourse against the City if in the future the drainage problem became worse. Mr. Johnson asked that wording be added to ensure the City could not require the removal of the improvement should it be determined that it has caused additional drainage problems. (*#4) #1743 ALBERT HANSER, 1685 FOX STREET - FINAL SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION #3187 It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Resolution #3187 for Application #1743 for Albert Hanser of 1685 Fox Street, approving the final subdivision of the property. Ayes 4,nays 0. I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 12, 1992 (*#5) #1755 LEONARD NISKA, 1204 SHADYWOOD ROAD - APTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3188 It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Resolution #3188 for Application #1755, Leonard Niska, 1204 Shadywood Road, approving a variance and granting a conditional use permit for the construction of a storage shed. Ayes 4, nays 0. (♦#6) #1761 MARK HUNSLEY, 3464 EASTLAKE STREET - AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3189 It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Resolution #3189 for Application #1761, Mark Hunsley, 3464 Eastlake Street, approving a variance to construct a storage shed on Outlet B, Bayside Beach. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#7) #1765 JOHN MOORE, 801 TONKAWA ROAD - VARIANCE Jim Cradit was present for this appiication. Gaffron explained the existing house is approximately half within the 0-75’ zone. The applicant Is proposing an addition to the existing kitchen and a second storv addition over the master bedroom, both within the 0-75’ zone. Jabbour stated the survey they were provided does not show the existing hardcover. Gaffron noted a complete copy of the updated survey is further back in the ExhIbits. Butler asked if the appIleant anticipates doing foundation work for the kitchen expansion. Cradit noted the steep embankment below the kitchen area and the amount of erosion is partly due to the fact that the house does not have gutters. He stated the excavating for the block work needed for the kitchen expansion will be done by hand. Butler suggested that be made a condition of the resolution. She added the property does not have its house numbers posted. Goetten said she would like to see a trade-off of hardcover within the same zone. She felt If the applicant expects to gat permission for an addition within a sensitive area, he should be expected to give something up. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 12, 1992 ZONING FILE #1765 - CONT. Jabbour asked if the walk from the garage to the deck could be eliminated. He felt this was an additional convenience. Butler stated there are walks all around the property. She asked if the appI I cant wouId like to maintain the walk to the deck or get permission for the kitchen expansion. She suggested walking on the grass. Gaffron pointed out hardcover in the 250-500’ zone may be under the allowed percentage. Further discussion led to a conclusion that the updated survey does not show gravel driveways existing in the 250- 500’ zone. Goetten suggested they request a complete and corrected survey. Jabbour suggested staff prepare a handout explaining survey requirements and the City’s policy on hardcover. Gaffron noted both items are thoroughly explained in the building permit and zoning applications, but are not always read or adhered to by applicants or their agents. 11 was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to table Application #1765 for John Moore, 801 Tonkawa Road, until the applicant provides a complete survey and to allow the appileant time to consider removal of hardcover within the 0-75’ zone. Ayes 4, nays 0. Callahan suggested the applicant may wish to consider the removal of both the walks. (#8) SHORELAND FLEXIBILITY REQUEST: A) STATUS UPDATE B) FORMAL FLEXIBILITY REQUESTS - SPRING PARK, WAYZATA, TONKA BAY, MINNETONKA BEACH AND WOODLAND Gaffron explained other cities have proposed granting a "Shoreland Impact Plan" conditional use permit in lieu of variance approval for commercially zoned property to allow additional hardcover, in exchange for improvements required by the city. He stated during the redevelopment process for the Navarre area, the City will find most properties wi I I require a variance to the hardcover ordinance. He stated the DNR has expressed that the City should not be granting as many variances as it currently does. He asked the Council if they wished to formally respond to the formal flexibility requests. j MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 12, 1992 SHORELAND FLEXIBILITY REQUESTS - CONT. Callahan felt they should consider the option of granting of a conditionai use permit versus approval of a variance. He stated currently there is not an economic force driving the redevelopment of Navarre. He felt they should respond positively to tne flexibility requests. Jabbour felt they should respond to these and all requests. He noted the DNR has been very forceful with regard to the shoreland regulations He felt the response should thank the DNR for the t^review the proposals and urge the DNR to grant the Cities flexibility to maintain existing development. JoEllen Hurr noted Minnetonka Beach has requested the same nexi^lityas Orono. She felt any redeve I opment of Property shou d provide for an improvement to the property. She stated Orono should stress that fact when commenting to the DNR on the flexibility requests. Goetten concurred, but noted the City needs to recognize other cities identity and needs. Callahan stated the DNR has not drafted their overall plan with relation to Lake Minnetonka. He said if the other cities are planning to adopt a rational plan with regard to their actual development, then Orono should encourage the DNR to accept that proposal. Gaffron was direc* at the next meetU tr draft a letter of response to be reviewed } * MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT A) Jabbour reported that some residents feel it Is more attractive to pay the fine for burning without a permit than to go through the inspection process. He suggested a 60 day permit. Butler suggested that renewal permits not be reinspected. B) Jabbour noted he read in the Sailor newspaper that the Little League group feels the City Council is oppoced to the ice arena. He did not want the City to be divided between groups. He suggested a letter to the Little League reiterating the Council’s views. C) Callahan requested a staff person attend the meeting to be held by the Metropolitan Council. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 12, 1992 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. D) Callahan rioted the agenda for the LMCD’s Task Force indicates the Chairman is looking for a consensus. He suggested, if the Orono representative is not in favor of the consensus, a letter sent explaining Orono’s position. He added, following the consensus vote, the reason for the estabiishment of the Task Force has been completed. He suggested at that point, all Orono representatives dissolve from the Task Force. Jabbour noted he is very disturbed with the Task Force. He stated all members of the LMCD are on the Task Force and he felt they have made a conscious effort to sway the outcome. He said he has been lobbying to dissolve the Task Force. Callahan stated he was under the impression that the Task Force was to consist of a number of different entities, of which, the LMCD is one part. Jabbour directed Moorse to send a letter to the LMCD designating Jabbour as the Orono representative to the Task Force, and to remind the LMCD that they should only have one representative also. He asked that Dennis Osmoson and Gordon Kimball of the DNR be sent a copy of the letter. Callahan stated negotiation regarding Maxwell Bay can only be between the City of Orono and the DNR. Jabbour stated at the next meeting, he wiI I accept the information, raise his objections, and move to dissolve the Task Force, and indicate Orono will not entertain any involvement with regard to the landing with anyone other than the DNR. Hurr indicated if the membership of the Committee was limited, Jabbour would have lost allies as well as enemies. ENGINEER’S REPORT 0»9) PAY REQUEST #1 - PUMP 4 METER SERVICE It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to authorize Pay Request 4M for the installation of the hoists at the new Public Works facility to Pump 4 Meter Service in the amount of $24,967.47. Ayes 4, nays 0. 8 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 12, 1992 CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#10) BRIAR STREET - PUBLIC VS. PRIVATE It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to table discussion regarding tt.*-S issue. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*#11) ASSESSMENT FOR HAZARDOUS BUILDINGS - RESOLUTION #3190 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to adopt Resolution #3190 adopting the assessment rol I for hazardous buiIdings action - 1992 - Ayes 4, nays 0. (#12) ESTABLISH PROCESS FOR REVIEW OF FUTURE USE OF CURRENT CITY HALL SITE Moorse referred to a request by the Historical Society to be al lowed to preserve the Counci I Chambers and move i t to a different Iocation. Callahan suggested they proceed with plans to raze all buildings at the Crystal Bay City Hall site and replace the buI IdIngs with grass. Butler asked about the money they had planned to raise from the property. Jabbour suggested transferring the ownership Df the sewer Pond property to the Park Commission and taking the money out of that fund and putting it into the building fund. Callahan suggested beginning the subdivision process for the sewer pI ant site. Goetten felt the City owes the residents consideration of the Crystal Bay site and any future development. Jabbour stated they will not be able to put in grass until next spring, so that will allow time to plan for the site. He felt they should proceed with the subdivision of the sewer pond site and go ahead and sell the two lots, based on the financial situation. Butler said she would rather develop the Crystal Bay site into a park. Cal Iahan suggested sending a letter to the Pioneer Museum informing them that the Council has not made a decision at this time. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 12, 1992 (#13) ESTABLISH CANVASSING BOARD MEETING The Canvassing Board meeting was scheduled for November 4, 1992 at 4:00 p.m. (#14) CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S SALARY ADJUSTMENT Goetten explained there are some issues the Council wished to review prior to approving. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Butler, to table a decision on the City Administrator’s one-year anniversary salary adjustment. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#15) RESCHEDULE 1993 BUDGET WORK SESSION Callahan stated it is unc: ar as to how the City will be affected by the HACA credit in the coming year. He stated he would like to review this at the work session. A work session to review the 1993 proposed budget was established for Friday, November 6, 1992 at 3:00 p.m. (#16) CITY FACILITIES FURNITURE ORDER/FUEL STORAGE Moorse explained they have taken an inventory of existing furniture which can be used in the new bui Iding. He asked that the dol lar amount be changed to $80,693 to reflect the inclusion of conference tables for the Council Chambers. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Jabbour, to authorize the furniture purchase for the new faciIities, not to exceed $80,693.00. Ayes 4, nays 0. Moorse explained tne Council approved the bid for fuel storage by Pump & Meter, and it was discovered at a later date that the bid did not include certain items. Pump & Meter resubmitted an unacceptable bid. He explained they have now submitted a bid for $75,354 which includes everything including all costs related to excavating and dewatering. Jabbour asked the status of the continger.cy fund. Moorse stated they are furniture and equipment, been a I Iocated. still within the amount allotted However, every dollar of that fund for has Jabbour reiterated they have not allowed for any type of emergency. 4 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 12, 1992 CITY FACILITIES - CONT. Moorse reviewed the items that have deferred to date. Jabbour felt they have not budgeted enough for the demolition of the existing buildings. He asked if the cost savings of not purchasing the fuel tanks has been reviewed. Gerhardson noted he has reviewed the issue of transport versus tank wagon delivery and it was determined it would cost $.05 to .08 more per gallon. Butler felt It woi d be penny v/lse and pound foolish to wait on somethinrthat is s involved as the installation of gas tanks. It was moved by ( lahan, seconded by Butler, to authorize the purchase of fuel s .irage tanks from Pump & Meter for an amount of $75,354. Ayes 4, nays 0. (»t17) LICENSES There were no licenses. (««18) BILLS It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Ayes 4, nays 0. ADJWRNk^NTr Qoetten adjourned the regular Orono 01 ty CouncI I meeting at 9:40 p.m. to Executive Session. Ayes 5, nays j. Diann Goetten, Acting Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk To; From: Date: Subject Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members vijb Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator **viV Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administri^J« ' ^S' October 21, 1992 #1521 J. Vogt and M. Hilbelink (Original Applicant Stephen Lombardozzi) ^ 115 O'.d Crystal ^■‘y Road North - ^ Final Subdivision - Resolution Council members may remember earlier this year that the original applicant sought approval of a year extensicn of preliminary subdivision approval of the three lot plat because of the indefinite stattxs of the Highway 12 corridor selection. Since Council's approval of the year extension, applicant has sold the property to Vogt and Hibelink. applicants have filed the final plat application and have fulfilled all conditions of preliminary subdivision approval as set forth in Resolution No. 2918. Please review applicants' letter of October 15th enclosed in your packets. Applicants ask for special consideration concerning access to Lot 2, Block 2. Applicants request direct access fur Lot 2, Block 2 at Old Crystal Bay Road claiming major hardships for future residents if private drive is to be constructed within Outlet A. Staff recalls the long intensive review of transportation plans and the future goal of the Ci »:y to restrict individual curb cuts onto Old Crystal Lay Road, considered a collector road, transferring local traffic to newly defined public road Wear Lane North. It is the City's plan to obtain right-of-way with each subdivision of a property northward of the subject parcel. Any access from Lot 2 was deemed unsafe by the City Engineer because of the 40 mile speed limit and tne steep hill limiting siting distance at the lot line. If Council accepts applicants' request for individual or separate access onto Old Crystal Bay Road, the plat should oo amended eliminating road outlot along northern boundary of Lot 1, Block 2. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the conditions set forth at preliminary approval time. r A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OP ROLLING MEADOWS THIRD ADDITION APPLICATION NO. 1521 WHEREAS# the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of uhe State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS# the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivir.ion regulations for the orderly# economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS# the City Council has considered the final subdivision application for a three lot plat by John Vogt and Michael Hilbelink (hereinafter the subdividers); WHEREAS# the subdivision has been found to meet all standards of the RR-IB rural residential zoning district and on-site septic ordinance of the City finding that each lot is of a size and configuration that would allow the continued use or the development of single family residential use without the need of any variances; and WHEREAS# the subdividers have completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City# including; 1. Completion of all the requirements of Resolution No. 2918# the resolution granting preliminary approval of the three lot plat. 2. Dedication on the plat of right-of-way for public roads shown as Old Crystal Bay Road and Wear Lane North. 3. Dedication on the plat of drainage and utility easement. 4. The granting of a temporary easement over portions of cul-de-sac not located within 50' public road. Temporary cul-de-sac shall be install^* at the northern boundaries of extended Wear Lane North. 5. Subdividet!j have created covenants to be filed against the chain of title of Lots 1 and 2# Block 2 that define location of septic test sites in order to protect these areas at the time of future development and to further alert property owners that these are the only available sites on property to develop on-site septic systems. Page 1 of 3 6. Payment to the City of a park dedication fee in the amount of $400.00. 7. Payment to the City for the legal review and filing of the plat, easements and covenants in the amount of $150.00. 8. Payment to the City for the final plat application fee of $150.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Rolling Meadows Third Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to the following conditions: 1. All lots shall achieve access via the extension of Wear Lane North. No additional curb cuts shall be allowed at Old Crystal Bay Road except that the City will allow existing driveway serving residence within Lot 2, Block 2 until a new principal structure is to be installed on the property and at that time all construction vehicles must access property via Wear Lane North and Outlot A. 2. A public road shall be installed to the northern boundary of the property and a temporary cul—de~sac shall be installed at the northern border. Subdividers or agents of subdividers shall be responsible for the removal of the existing cul-de—sac within Wear Lane North. 3. Septic test site within southeast portion of Lot 1, Block 1 .j all septic sites within Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 must be fenced off prior to any land alterations within the subject property. 4. Engineering plans for road must be approved by the City Engineer before the subdividers' contractor can begin construction of public road. Subdividers must also provide an executed developers' agreement and letter of credit (to be written to 150% of the value of improvements) to insure that all required improvements are installed to the City's satisfacticn. 5. Outlot A has been created for the sole vse of Lot 2, Block 2 for driveway purposes only and Outlot A shall be legally combined with Lot 2, Block 2 upon the filing of the final plat. Page 2 of 3 6.The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with either the Hennepin County Recorder's Office or the Registrar of Titles Office on or before October 26, 1993 together with a certified original copy of this resolution and executed copies of the easements and/or covenants noted above. The approval granted by this resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision rev/'ew. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 26th day of October, 1992. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 26th day of October, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor 6 City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary P* ^Ixc Page 3 of 3 i CITY OF ORONO City of OFiOlVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2918 _________ A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF A PLAT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 115 OLD CRYSTAIi BAY ROAD NORTH FILE NO. 1521 WHEREAS, Stephen Lombardozzi (hereinafter "the applicant") on March 28, 1990 filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a three lot residential plat of a property legally described as follows: The north 16 rods of the south 3/4 of the southeast 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of Section 33, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, (hereinafter "the property") and; WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statues 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 21, 1990 at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on October 22, 1990 the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of the applicant, noting the following findings of fact: 1. The property is located within the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. 2. The property contains a tctal of approximately 8.04 acres. All of which is considered dry buildable lands. 3. The proposed plat contains three lots each exceeding the 2.0 acre minimum lot area requirement. 4. A1 1 three lots have been found to have adequate and suitable area for both principal and alternate on site sewage treatment systems meeting all requirements of the on site sewage treatment code of the City. 5. All lots have been planned so that each lot can be developed with residential structures meeting all required setbac)cs of the zoning district. Page 1 of 4 r CITY OF ORONO City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2918_________ 6. The proposed amended plan that provides access to all lots via an interior plat road meets the full intent of the Comprehensive Plan of the City. NOW, THEREFORE BE RESOLVED, that based upon either one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat for Stephen Lombardozi for the property located at 115 Old Crystal Bay Road North per the survey by All Metro Land Surveyors originally dated 5/10/88, revised 12/1/90, subject to the following conditions: 1. All lots shall achieve access via the extension of Wear Lane North. No additional curb cuts shall be allowed at Old Crystal Bay Road except that City will allow existing drive way rerving residence within Lot 2, Block 2 until a new principal structure is installed on property. 2. Public road to be installed to northern boundary of property. Temporary cul-de-sac to be installed at northern border. Applicant to provide underlying road and utility easements over portions of cul-de-sac not located within 50’ public road. Applicant shall be responsible for the removal of the existing cul-de-sac within Wear Lane North. 3. Septic test site within southeast portion of Lot 1, Block 1, Lot 1, Block 2 and Lot 2, Block 2 must be fenced off prior to any land alterations within the subject property. 4. Engineering plans for road must *'e approved by the City Engineer before the applicant's ontractor can begin construction of public road. 5. Applicant shall have filed against the chain of title of Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 covenants that define location of septic test sites in order to protect these areas at the time a future drive is installed within private driveway outlet to serve Lo* 2, Block 2. 6. Outlet B has been created for the sole use of Lot 2, Block 2 for driveway purposes only and Outlet B shall be legally combined with Lot 2, Block 2 upon the filing of the final plat. Page 2 of 4 P J CITY OF ORONO City of OROIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2918_________ FINAL PLAT SUBMITTALS The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month: A. RECORD PLAT drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1"=200’. Drawing to include: a) Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by All Metro Land Surveyors Inc, revised 12/1/90. b) Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' wide along all perimeter property lines and 5' each side of internal property lines. c) Designation and dedication of a public road within the subject property (extension of Wear Lane North). d) Dedication of 33' of right-of-way for Old Crystal Bay Road. e) Name plat. B. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required: a) Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. b) The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. c) Signed and executed developers agreement and letter of credit for construction of the public road. e) Signed and executed Road and UtiJ.ities Easement to be granted to the City over area of cul-de-sac not included in public right-of-way. Page 3 of 4 City of OROINO CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2918 _________ cm OF dhquq FimaCE LFFICE CHECK 7QO.O C. FEES TO BE PAID: Total Due $700.00 a) Park dedication fee per current schedule: $200.00/each new lot Total = $400.00 REiEirT-Wm YOU U255200 coot ROl T14 IQ/iZ b) Final plat fee = $150.00 c) Legal review and filing fees of $150.00 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 14th day of January^ 1991. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor liallin, City Clerk STATE OF NESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 14th day of January, 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporc\tion and said ir^trument was e_xecuted on behalf of the City. THERESA L NAAB NOTARY PU8U0 • MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY n AipIfM M-82 Notary Public Page 4 of 4 i Michael Hilbelink John Vogt 85 Golden View Drive Long Laker Minn. 55356 Oct. 15/ 1992 Orono City Ha?’. 1335 South Brown Road Orono/ Minn. Dear City Council Members; We would like for you to reconsider your position regarding the future closing of the access to Lot 2, Block 2/ Rolling Hills 3rd Addition from Old Crystal Bay Road/ when you vote on the Final Plat approval. Our reasons for this are as follows: 1. We are not adding any additional curb cuts by the developement of this property. The primary residence currently accesses off of Old Crystal Bay Road and the two (2) additional/ newly created lots/ will access off an extention of Wear Lane. 2. There are adequate site lines that meet your requirements for such an access. 3. The existing proposal would create a 600' to 700' foot driveway which is very expensive to build/ upkeep and to maintain. 4. The natural access for this lot is from the east/ which would create a much shorter driveway and make for a more desireable house location. We hope you will give this your strongest consideration. Thank you for your time. 1 To; From: Date: Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator October 21, 1992 Subject: #1765 John E. Moore, 801 Torkawa Road - Variance^ Resolution Oct o ClTVn^ ^^9? 0 List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Revised Survey Exhibit B - 0-75' Hardcover Itemization and Sketch Exhibit C - 75-250'/250-500' Hardcover Verification Exhibit D - Proposed Site Plan Exhibit E - Notice of Council Action 10-12-92 Exhibit F - Cradit Memos 10-19-92/10-21-92 Exhibit G - Resolution Discussion Applicant's surveyor has provided an updated survey which now includes the driveway serving the garage at "801 B", in addition to portions of walkway or stepping stones leading from the pool shed area to the lake. I have itemized and calculated 0-75' hardcover based on the revised survey and my observations on the site, and this yields an existing 0-75' hardcover of 11.2%. Similarly, I have itemized hardcover in the 75-250' and 250-500' zones and can confirm that the surveyor's percent;*.ges (16% and 23% respectively) are correct. Mr. Cradit has indicated that Mr. Moore will agree to removal of approximately 104 s.f. of sidewalk (item I on the 0-75' hardcover detail) to compensate for the 90 s.f. addition at the southwest corner of the house. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution, which has been revised to indicate corrected hardcover percentages and the fact that there will be concurrent hardcover removals to result in no hardcover increase in the 0-75' zone. i A l±CJ-3^ ____Z^lfCr. _________________ dSLJLJd^_____ Si-S- J>—-'. 6.. i4^ i /^cn«^itu Va* >. 7r-' !________>* 1-2.2_>» a lc.K.Vj xa ---------Ctf f ^T“1—•1 ■ ■B'Xi --------- /2- M 0O X a 9 Am ^ Am. . ^ ^ " ' •Mi4M /ZJf.TS^ ■ ' — -Tt «^ ^9 '..i Vx^S' ak>^ '9JD 2.0 3z.V9"’r' ------w9X_ -2y^ rr*,—r .r*^* tM/yv<- 7.? *;? f;-':;,-. ,V;> ‘^;■.^HifS?3~T7ijl;g•: • • « *• • / •‘ ^ ..«•• . ■ r-.* . . •• • .*>* » A . •-% - <• • • “.■ ••• . • .. j . f *v** i ___to__--------------------i '/Q.ffi___________________ li ifHfc-K.r»r — *. f __ 11 1_ «... Slif X 14^7 ll •-Mi \ i •._ T1^ JfcA 'HI . _ 1 ._,fWU»»*»'ai#i ^___ __SO... ____..'U'U i»v» .;• _________C>«>w 1<or Ifli! • _!____________ __7vA I- io_• 1 1 _. /fW 1 1 \i ________________ ____________ m .1 ____L. ............-.... in J i7 C - .3 * r'ir ( i3-»,7r___ APPLTCATJ(5?I NO. 1765 CITY OP ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 NOTICE OP COUNCIL ACTION Date of Notice: 10/19/92 TO: John E. Moore 801 Tonkawa Road Long Lake* MN 55356 COPIES: James B. Cradit & Assoc. 67 8th Avenue NE Minneapolis* MN 55413 TYPE OF APPLICATION! Variance DATE OF MEETING: October 12* 1992 VOTE: 4 For 0 Against COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION: Tabled pending submittal oft 1. Revised survey whowing all hardcover on property. 2. Proposal for 0-75' zone hardcover removals (90 s.f.) The survey has been received. Please advise regarding Item 2. The application is scheduled for the Council meeting of Monday* October 26* 1992* 7:00 p.ra. If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes* they are available from the City Clerk after revie%r and approval by the City Counci1. Isv •>.' cU PLH<nH Jb 379~1^7 cisdit A Msodmn, ■«.. tm A t n f m0iA ff»4lt f r«ffi df •MtvundiAf hom«« PosMt ^ orgnd fax tran$mina( memo 76T/1 Co -------- . atu^^cj T5#pr~ nrr ^----------- . i» »f pagtt » y ~cs: <UUa«iT ^ 4fcS*C- f73-d5/o P^,> 37^ <^yf7^ P«I « jO- H CiT^r 1^55- crWS'T^ Atr- ^ (7C»^^ rffOO^ (j/yiU49je^ % A I rviiiot: ^ - ^ <,,dK/9-r^^S S feA^o ttJ 0^7 f , fLCpe***^ ^ J«A>'*'»' /<.-/«‘.»t —*«>-«. ^c»o, ■*5 auju*^, Jiasuj f. MtO^ 4*^<«4 ■» (lnunooi. y® Sf «»/* C/L^ ^>-7^ 2®Ai< r» ^'*- 4.<f. C,4- MX Mt/o* /“•*- OM^ IP ilou a •XT ^0 '9c ic H'.4 t HL h/iIh HARDCOVER CALCULAflOM ffifiKSHEET r . c SEtiACK lONt! (CIRCLE 0118)^-7^ 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' ExtSTitis H arocovjs in 7ohe • • A. Housi „.X _«# IP LENGTH« •' WIDTH _ X S 10 -------, X .m IE..M 9 # F f • • c w • X 9 • p • • m c ___ X___ __ • MM 9 • r • i 9 . - X 1DMM # • F t # 0 c, D riveway ____ X ............9 — # • r t 4 9 X ^m <9 • P • • f 9 9• • Di. Sidewalk .X Sit. 9 9 IT 0 « f.r. 9. R-X __ X - _003 M* v S T” » £• £AT4q/ __ X * t_____ i« 9 9r $ • R.L anoscafe __ X _« m ^ ^ W . S.F. t •n ' - ARIAS UNDERLAIN ■V __ X ELASTIC SHEEriNQ M - -__I X • • r # 9.R. i* OfHER _ X . 9d>I.P. f 1 s.F. m Total H aaocovir in Zoni 2osa. Total PioRurr Arta in Zm [*)-3og2 a 100 • % » •• f \ , <XT ^0 M.n.w ♦« 6. O^R SCrBACK -ZCNg ; (CIRCIE ome) Existing H ardcover in Zone • • A* Hnii^E 0-75' (Ts -2S^ 250-500' 500-1000' K •__^000 a.F. LENGTH WIDTH X „ -• /74 S.P. X . /60 S.P. •X ,.S.F. X S.P. n. (lAffAfiE X f.P* r. n»IVf?WAY X -_j^57 S.F. X • f S.F. • • « n. 5! 1 niruAi K X ^¥97 1*^__ S t F • X IB f.P. X S.F. B. JATIO/ Deck X _______« ^__I.F. . •• » 1 AMfiiripp X ?iP. AREAS UNOtJILAlN sv X S.F. RUSTIC • • • tHEtriHQ X S.F. X IB I.F. Total HMocovti f!« lewi T/~/ra i.r S.A. To^al pRoftfirY A iua to Zofii 0m%.f, / 100 - /S.O % rm I q| to-ll It • • « • ^ ^ •."If cO ’’tfc * .t€ MmHI m•• • •. • .. .. HARDCOVER OLCULATlOfl WORKSHEET SETBACK zoNt: (cfKCLE Qfic) 0-75' 75*750'^250-500^ 500*1000' ExiiTtfiQ H arocovm in Zone A. H ouse 3Z Ti'i'HJ Cr/. UN8TH ■. G akagc c. tlllVEWAY e« SiSCfALK Z££. Patio / Deck i f.UNOSCAAi AAIAK UtiOCKLA IN •T ELASTIC SHCITIM 0. Q jhek X X X X WlOfM X y2o ZZS. X . .. L i:/2L So Total H akocovek in Zone Total PiwEfinr AAfA in I Q /T3^_4 esz.S.F. 720^S.E. SiF S.F. S.F. m 72c S.F, 2o3'-i _ m i.r. __S.F. Si • 9d I.F. I.F t.F. fii. t.r« S.F f.F. T-- . 4 t.F. i.r. 0 Q biiCO ■ I u» > iiy/ei -% / |0 ♦1 11* 3/^j-4»4r frmm A ««ocatn. ine. A • M41 1 fiil gmi^n^ of MMn^irm hom«t Po»t-H • brand (ax jransnifttHi memo /H7:***' «ii ••*p*««»» 2- VTK t€ tjil ® P_id <L«^ o Pj. CXL/f^i-y Co ^ _ PCft^K»MS<C Jlljirf7JL- ^5*/« 9hAf\# $ ^___ _37«?- 12yilS7J- I lo. *21. ^ dT'TY <5F ^ '^ITCS* UAfUA^C^ e. /vvoo^-*- ( t-» a«F- io-T.i-f^ yoj<t s r f'AMs Arit exc«pr "&'■ V® 5«3 sr. n t> TO 7^ OP CoO-ettA<,€. U.t. f4opo,*P -r. ac^ooc. S.C OF rae t,pp^ At Ate* X . CAOT*^^^^ c rf A RESOLCrriOII GRAHTIHG VARIANCBS TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 AND 2, SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8, AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L) PILE «1765 WHEREAS, John E. Moore (hereinafter "the applicant") la owner of the property located at 001 Ton)cawa Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described aa followat Exhibit "A" attached (hereinafter "the property")! and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2j 10.55, Subdivision 8} and 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) to permit the c —action of additions to the existing residence, such additions constituting additional structure and hardcover in the 0-75* la)ceshore setbac)c sene where no structure or hardcover is norsMlly allowed. Minnesota I 1. 2. NOW, THBREPORB, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1765. The property is located in the LR-IB Single Family LaJeeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Crono Planning Cosssission reviewed this application on September 21, 1992 and rcco»naended appioval of the proposed variances based upon the following findlnqsi a) Approximately 60% of the existing house and deck is located in the 0*75* setback zone. b) A propcsed kitchen addition is proposed to extend an exterior wall approximately 5* nearer the shoreline than that existing wall of the house, yielding a 49* lakeshore setback instead of the existing 54* setback Page I of 7 at that location. Adjacent portions of the house currently exist as rear as 44* to the shoreline. The interior layout of the house makes it difficult to expand the kitchen area without encroaching into the 0- 7S* setback. c) The proposed second story addition above the existing master bedroom, which is 60* from the shoreline, will create no additional hardcover and will merely create new structure aoov© the existing footprint. d) The increase in 0-75* hardcover as a result of the kitchen addition is 90 s.f. or an increase of 0.^*« hardcover in the 0-75’ zone. There is no extraneous hardcover in the 0-VS* zone that could be removed to result in nc net hardcover increase. 4. At the:, r October 12, 1992 meeting the City Council determined that no net hardcover increase in the 0-75* zone was justified. The applicant subsequently agreed to concurrent removals of 90^ s.f. of sidewalk in the 0-75* zone to result in no net hardcover Increase above the existing 11.2% level in that zone. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the firdings and recommendations of the Planning Coseilssion, report! by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. d. The Cicy Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to It and do not apply generally to other property in this sonlng districtr that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring propertyi would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty? is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant? and wou Id be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Soning Code and Coag>rehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 7 COMCLUSIOHS, OROKR AMD CO9D1T10MS Based the above findings* the Orono City Council hereby grants variances Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22* Subdivisions 1 and 2j 10.55* Su.>division 8; and 10.56* Subdivision !6 (L) to permit the construction of o 90 s.f. kitchen addition located 49* from the shoreline and a second story above the existing master bedroom located 60' from the shoreline* constituting a structure and hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback 2one where structure and hardcover is normally not allowed, subject to the following conditions: 1. Hardcover in the 0-75' zone is limited to 11.2% as shown on the sito plan (Exhibit *B” attached). Hardcover removals are required as shown on Exhibit B. The current property owner and all future owners of this property are placed on notice that hardcover shall not be increased above the currently approved level in the 0-75' zone, and any proposed Improvements on the property that will result in additional hardcover must be approved by the City. Such approval nay result in a requirement for concurrent equivalent or greater renovals of existing hardcover. All existing hardcover scheduled for resioval as a condition of this resolution must be renoved prior to the footing inspection for the new construct ion, 2. All excavation work in the area of the kitchen addition shall bo by hand methods rather than by heavy machinery. Proper neasures shall be taken to protect the steep banka from erosion or vegetation disruption. J. Authorities granted by this variance run with th« property not with the applicant* but ere permissive only and Bust be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (October 26* 1993). 4, Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and eonditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the toning code* shall autosuit ica 1 ly tarmlnate any authority granted herein* and shall be punishable ss e oisdemeenor. Peg# 1 of 7 5.The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. October, Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 26th day of 1992. attest I Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. ^terson. Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OP MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUHTf OF UEMNEPItl ) The foregoing InstrusMint was acknowledged before i»e on this 26th day of October, 1992, oy Barbara A. Peterson t Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor 6 City Clerk f the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said i itruswnt was executed on behalf of the City. liotary Public Page 4 of 7 hereby alf of ees to tie of day of To; From: Date: Subject: Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrat^^^ ^ October 13, 1992 ^ \ 11766 Howard Eisinger, 3245 Wayzata Blvd. - Conditional Use Permit -- Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.03, Subds. 19 and 20 - Conditional use permit required for filling and grading activities in excess of 100 cubic yards. Applicant has filed for a second conditional use permit for the filling of 20,000 cubic yards to be placed over a 12 acre area. The City approved a conditional use permit for 10,000 cubic yards (Application #1722) on April 13, 1992. List of Exhibits - A - Application . B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Site Plan E - DNR Letter of 3/31/92 F - MCWD Permit 7/15/92 G - Current Developer's Agreement H - Letter of Credit I - Resolution No. 3108 J - Olson Letter 3/10/92 (Bonestroo) K - S. Gustafson Letter (Bonestroo) Status of Application #1722 The applicant has received approximately 10,000 cubic yards of fill under the current conditional use permit issued by the City in April of 1992. The City has a fully executed developer's agreement and letter of credit to insure that final grades and required plantings are completed as required by the City Engineer. Grading contractors hired through the Stubbs Bay sewer project have been delivering fill to the site and have for the most part followed the guidelines set forth lor filling activities under Resolution No. 3108, In fact, Harlan Olson of the City Engineer's office has advised that the grading contractors have also been responsible for the grading on Mr. Eisinger's site. Erosion control has been maintained during the period -f filling and will continue until final ground cover is restored. Applicant has not been required to see»d any area as yet. % Zoning File #1766 October 13, 1992 Page 2 Review of Current Application The applicant has filed for a second conditional use permit per the advise of the contractors who advised applicant that there will be additional fill available. In the early discussions with applicant, it was not clear as to how much fill was to be requested under the current conditional use permit. The staff person accepting the application advised that 20,000 cubic yard limit may provide the most flexibility. It is not clear if applicant is to receive additional fill from other improvement projects in the area. The Public Works Director has advised that there is at the most an additional 3,000 cubic yards of fill available to Mr. Eisinger from the Stubbs Bay Project. Applicant should advise if he expects to receive additional filx from other suppliers. Shawn Gustafson of Bonestroo completed an inspection noting that the area receiving the fill measures approximately 300'x500' and that the placing of 20,000 cubic yards of fill will raise the elevations approximately 3-4'. In our discussions, we noted that it may be appropriate to ask Mr. Eisinger to review his current goals for the property. Issues for Consideration 1. Should there be a final cap placed on filling of this area with the current conditional use permit application? 2. Resolution No. 3108 was written for a two year period of time expiring in April of 1994. How long should the current conditional use permit be in effect? 3. Based on applicant's response to the question of available fill within the next year, how many cubic yards should the current CUP be limited to? 10,000 or 20,000? Please review Exhibit K. Gustafson recommends that side slopes be Immediately graded to a 3-1 slope and seeded. All additional fill to be received shall be placed to the interior and once again maintained at no greater than a 1% slope. Erosion control shall remain in place throughout the winter and spring months until final grading and seeding have been completed. Zoning File #1766 October 13, 1992 Page 3 Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission recommendation of approval must address the following: 1, Readopt all conditions of original conditional use permit as set forth in Resolution No. 3108, Exhibit I. 2. 3. 4. 5. What limits shall be set on the amount of fill to be approved in the current application? 10,000; 20,000, other? How long a period of time shall the current conditional use permit be in effect? Through April of 1994, for a two year period of time (October of 1994) or for one year (October of 1993)? Will Planning Commission recommend prohibiting the issuance of future conditional use permits allowing fill to be brought to the site? Applicant to provide updated developer's agreement and letter of credit to correspond to current conditional use permit. Zoning File #1766 October 22, 1992 Page 4 Additional Comments and Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Conunission questioned applicant as to when the filling project was to be completed. The applicant advised that to meet the original goals that a total 100,000 cubic yards would be required. Members felt that the comprehensive project should be reevaluated and that prior to another conditional use permit being filed for filling that both City and applicant reevaluate the filling project. The applicant was also questioned as to other prospects for filling as staff had reported that the Stubbs Bay project would only result in an additional 3,000 cubic yards of fill. Applicant was unable to provide any information as to a specific supplier. The Planning Commission limited the present conditional use permit to a maximum 10,000 cubic yards adopting all conditions of the original conditional use permit. In addition, they requested that certain large objects of junk and debris to the exterior of the filled site be removed, i.e. freezer, truck, etc. and that seeding be completed by May 31st. It is staff's opinion that the City Engineer has made specific recommendations and that he is far more familiar with status of the filling site than the Planning Commission. Please review Exhibit K. Mr. Gustafson has specifically asked that side slopes be regraded to 5:1 slopes and seeded within a month. The City staff recommends that we follow the guidelines set forth in the Engineer's report. The enclosed approval resolution sets forth the conditions of the Engineer's report as well as the conditions of the original permit. Isv A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISIONS 19 & 20 FILE #1766 WHEREAS, Howard F. Eisinger (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: PID: 32-118-23 l-i 0002 Section 32, Township 118, Range 23, commencing at a point in the East line of Government Lot 1 distance 393.24 feet South along said line from the South line of State Highway No. 12 thence at right angles West from said East line 418 feet thence at right angles North 393.02 feet to South line of highway thence West along said highway line to West line of said Lot 1 thence South along said West line to Northerly line of Great Northern Railroad right-of-way thence Southeasterly along said right-of-way line to East line of Lot 1 thence North to beginning (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit to permit the filling of 20,000 cubic yards of clean fill to be placed over a former dump site of approximately 12 acres per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19 and 20. All filling activities shall talce place 35' from the adjacent wetlands at the 972 elevation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1766. The property is located in the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District. Page 1 of 6 J 3. On June 8, 1987, the Orono Council approved Application #1103 granting a permit to the applicant to allow the filling of 100,000 cubic yards of clean fill per the conditions set forth in Resolution #2197. The applicant never received fill under this conditional use permit. 4. On April 13, 1992, the Orono Council approved Application #1722 granting a permit to allow the filling of 10,000 cubic yards of clean fill per the same conditions repeated in Resolution #3108. The 10,000 cubic yards of fill have been received by applicant. 5. On October 19, 1992, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the application and recommended unanimous approval of the application as amended based on the following findings: A. The current proposal will have no negative impact on the surrounding wetlands or intersecting drainageway. B. The adjacent property owners have been advised of the applicant's proposal and none have voiced objection or submitted written opposition to the City. C. The application as modified by the Planning Commission will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vacinity. D. During the review of the two earlier conditional use permits, Braun Engineering, in a letter dated May 28, 1987, has opined as follows regarding the placement of approximately 100,000 cubic yards of fill over a former dump site. "...it is our opinion that the addition of 5' of fill over the area presents a very slight risk of embankment failure." Page 2 of 6 E. The current application (#1766) shall involve the filling of an additional 10,000 cubic yards of clean fill. 6, The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the filling of 10,000 cubic yards of clean fill as approved by the City Engineer, will not be be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent nnd objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 7. The City Council has considered this application as amended including the findi;-M}c and recommendations of the Planning Commission, repor- 3 by staff and comments of the applicant and the aj'.ect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19 and 20 to permit the placing of 10,000 cubic yards of fill as approved by the City Enginaer, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant or applicant's agent must adhere to the following guidelines at the time of filling: A. Side slopes 5:1 ratio; B. 1% slope to be maintained within inner fill area; C. Silt fence to continue to be maintained 30-35' from wetland at 972 elevation - no land alterations allowed within 26' of wetland. 2. Provide an updated Developer's Agreement and appropriate security to ensure final grading and seeding if fill project is not completed. Page 3 of 6 3. 4. 6. 7. Fill shall not exceed allowed amount of 10,000 cubic yards. Per City Engineer's report of October 14, 1992, fill area edges along the marsh and adjacent upland area should be dressed up, finish grading (5:1 ratio) and seeded by November 15th, Additional fill material should be placed in the center of the fill area to allow re-vegetation of the edge. Mn/DOT mixture number 700 seed shall be used for seeding disturbed areas. The applicant shall be responsible for advising the City of the schedule of hauling activities so that staff can arrange for the necess-ary inspections. Prior hauling any fill to the site, the applicant must a . ange for a pre-construction meeting with the Orono staff to review all final submittals and tentative hauling schedule. The City will ask that a representative of its Police Department be present at the pre-construction meeting to advise of any special traffic/safety concerns during the hauling process. Hauling activities shall not be conducted during the following time periods: 6:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. Any future requests for filling on the applicant's property shall be evaluated by both applicant's consultants and Orono staff and consultants. The City Engineer cautions that the area may not accommodate much more fill before it L ,xns to stand out from the existing topography. The applicant shall cease all hauling to the site upon evidence of shearing and/or other signs of instability created by filling over the former dump site. Applicant shall not proceed with hauling until the City Engineer has had adequate time to review the evidence and submit a written report to the Council for their review and action. If Council determines that it is in the public interest to cease all hauling to the site, this conditional use permit shall be terminated immediately and the applicant shall complete the final grading and seeding of the entire disturbed area. Page 4 of 6 8. Applicant is responsible for updating all previous permits issued by the Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Hennepin County Department of Environment and Engineering, and M.C.W.D. before the Orono staff can issue a land alteration permit. 9. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the owner, but are permissive only. This land alteration permit shall be valid for a two year period (October 26, 1994). 10. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 11. The undersigned owner has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successois and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 26th day of October, 1992. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 5 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 26th day of October, 1992 by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M, Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed tne foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OP MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _._ _ _ _ _i-r—■»—i_ _ _known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed tb' foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executt the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 6 of 6 CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICA^^ ^ ------------------------------------------------7 9^ TT ^ ' Sil-e Address VV.A\^3^^r.A. f?^ ^^a(c . M/r.______ PROPERTY LOCATION Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) .?-a. -//?.a>,7 /v ocxr^n. . Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name /7 a. Phone (home; ~ Phone (work) Address City OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phene (heme) Phone Address Citv Zip Date Prooertv Acauired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - [ll'Y OF L>iD,y^ Fisml OFFICE $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP applij5Si<!;3yi^<5 .. vi CEii 1 ^ $125.00 Residential accessory Use $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Co.Tunercial/Industrial Use $200.09 Lard Alteration mac.- n .iw-w K£CSlf-7--mi. 70Umuo cool noijcsij Oy/03/9. Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling ~ 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - sec fee schedule Renewal Fee - $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 ^3777 $175.00 $ 75.00 $300.00 $300.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Appeals Other - see fee schedule I PRESENT USE OP PROPERTYPresent Zoning District _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Present Use of Property _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Residential ___________ 0+her (specify)______________ mm m • •• •• •• •• *"* DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST , Describe-request in detail: ^ ,y^ --/ - - - -fC " ^_ _ _ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. . , w*. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obta this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Governme Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map. 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if Ian alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). 6. Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17’ OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. mm mm w • • mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm <mm mm mm ^m mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm ^m mm Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date- - - - - - - - - - APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied^ is true and correct to the best of his/her Jcnowledge. Applicant's s^ — Date 9*- ------------ OWNERS SIGNATURE . ,r 4-v.The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature ,, ^— . Date ____^ ^ J. ________■- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. k t />* • kt'vi Jl 4L»a h ^ •• .ai A*.>• •*• t-'r •, .* a. ;*/ \r ' ■ .• • ■ IvjiS-. k- '-•,;r.; - :i- ?% * / V ^ ? , .• • 'V • ^ • # S -:If.:‘ - * .--;-v • » •• . .' t ■ • 1 • - 4 a / 1 • ■'•r * ' » IrT /i;r*.-' |k-.-■• r-2 ■■ '-'-m1Mim 1. I L, *' « - • ‘ V* t • V a * r* J -• ‘> *. 'V I!;<•.■5^;'ite: ::im'fe. .*/ i;!: •Ti • .r TX^’ ••Tr •>* i 'It *-:.r . ?:f mIVs ■-•.VI I; m:'Sp *' vl*k_s^*^’j i1; §: §i:'mm II #.■ V-V.II-.-j ' ••. *f • •. • • t._ #* ^'• vM ;•crv.• ••« Vl'iV-Cv- JV'V .t-:^ I • • /, 0 ■ y\^. AV 'e-- ■ ^ • • •• ' - jV .\\'’* ‘ ■•’ - i ^ T ^ ■ m. * ^ M I ^L.% mm # ^ ^ “.• W r-/ I . V • \ ^-----—'. -- -. — - \ . ••.^'--------------------- I-J-'' I ^»« • • r • * • / f •‘A’- - -'- r : - Vf _=./i •; - •- • . . V./ •" ~ ^-'•-‘--J •• ^ --.p___ ‘ y- •“» r. .-ST' l'-U> . T----- • ^ « .V'. • ^ V XX • I #• 1 r. I -1 II.l, J \l J J !s .k ; ■j mm r' ri^yv *«#. fi It’ • *. -irf • «♦ •.*f . A- ' :■« ^•i: Ti-. :.'.J:'v. -Vj •* <r« • •-••.V-• .* ••' V. X- • .'»• *1 V. V i; *• • • \ k t % •*»* i-'^V v.r .'■?'; ^-ii: ■ I *r» M £ STATE OF ^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESaURG-E-S^V\V, METRO WATERS - 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, 72-7910 March 31, 1992 PHONE NO. 772 Ms. Jeanne Mabusth City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 1 193^ RE: HOWARD EISINGER, C.U.P., WETLAND #27-841W, CITY OF ORONO, HENNEPIN COUNTY (NE 1/4, S.32, T.118N, R.23W) Dear Ms. Mabusth: Based on discussion with Mr. Howard Eisinger, I understand interest has been renewed in a proposal originally discussed in 1987. In Judy Boudreau's March 13, 1987 letter (copy attached), we indicated the DNR would have no objection to this proposal if the fill is at least 26 feet from the wetland edge. In May of 1987 a concern with detrimental impacts to the wetland due to additional loads was raised (copy of your May 5, 1987 letter enclosed) . It was our understanding the applicant would be required to do necessary analysis to address this potential concern. No DNR permit is required if the fill will be setback at least 26 feet from the wetland, as proposed. As long as the following points have been addressed we have no objection to this proposal: 1. The fill is at least 26 feet from the wetland edge. 2.The questions regarding impacts of the ’’additional load” on the wetland have been addressed. 3.The proposal is consistent with the city's current floodplain and shoreland management regulations, and 4.The proposal meets applicable provisions of the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991. Please contact me at 772-7910 should you require any additional input on this matter. Sincerely, * ^ Ceil Strauss Area Hydrologist cc:Howard Eisinger Ron Quanbeck, Minnehaha Creek WSD Tim Fell, USCOE AN eOUAl. OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER jyiH\ll\!EHAHA CREEK \AiATERSHED DISTRICT i 6 .. P.O. Box 387, Wayzala. Minnesota 55391 BOUO OF MAHACEHS: Jjmes R. Spensl« Ptes. • J^n E- 0 Ejckson . C. WxxKow Love • C'Jfkion Unoley • Thomas Maple. Jr. pprmit Application No. 92-48; Applicant: Howard Eisinger 3245 Wayzata Blvd. I #' . r?iv^ofO«)no Sec 32BD, south of Hwy 12 and west of Stubbs Bay Road Purpose:' Siomwaier m’anagemeni plan for placement of approximately 10.000 cubic yards ^ of fill on an abandoned landfill site. Dear Mr. Eisinger: Receipt is acknowledged for the following which you have submitted as part of the above permit application: 1. Plan revised July 10, 1992. Tltis plan is in accordance with the action taken by the Board of Managers on May 21. 1992 in reference to the above permiL This letter is your permit from the Minnehaha Creek Wateished District. Permit approval is based upon the following exhibits: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. ll. Permit Application 92-48 received April 6. 1992. Letter from the applicant to the District dated April 6, 19V2. MCWD Permit File No. 74-9. m d?J;pplr=ant da.^ March 31.1992. SSr^^e^Di'slricu^^^^^ tlateJ April 20. 1992 informing him of the Board Utmr frtSra the applicant to the District dated April 29^^2. informing him of the Board action on May 21, 1992. Plan revised July 10, 1992. Pcrmil Application No. 92-48 Page Two July 15. 1992 T-u n nr^nmvpd iheoermiiaDDlication assubmillfid. This document is your pcrmil from the MCWD U S^valid^fOT OM (1) yew from ihe dale of approval nottd above. If consmiciion is not Jlmnlete bv Mav 21 1993, an extension must be requested. The applicant is responsible for ^ fn^rewiih^all District rules and for the acuons of your representauves, contractors and em'SfowM Pie* e contact the District at 473-4224 when the project is about to commence so an ins^tor may view the work in progress. JAMES M. MONTGOMERY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC Enginecis for the District Ronald S. Quanheck P.E. Date of Issue Board file City of Orono CITY OP ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA DBVEIX3PER*S AGREEMENT FOR City of Orono Docu^T.er.t Form Revised 5/91 (Name of Development) Howard Bisinger (Name of Developer) THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this —21th__ day of ^ 1992 , by and between the City of Orono, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter called "City"), and __ _ _ _Howard Eisinger-^- - - - its heirs, successors and assigns, (hereinafter called "Developer ). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Developer has made application to the City Council for approval of a conditional use permit (1722) to allow the filling of 10,000 cubic yards of fill on property. As of July 24, 1992 the property shall receive 8,000 cubic yards as property has already receive cubic yards. AND, WHEREAS, the City Council has granted approval for such ^tr;sr f- ?he rst\\°atr:r of \r"i:s:sr%": the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual promises and conditions hereinafter contained, xt is hereby agre_ as follows. . Initials of Developer -- - - -- Initials of City Cleric -- - - - - Page 1 of 7 1. Property Description; 32-118-23 14 0002 2. Improvements: In accordance with the policies and ordinances of the City/ the following described public or private improvements (hereinafter collectively called the "Improvements") shall be constructed and installed on the terms and conditions hereinafter contained : Per Resolution No. 3108 and MCWD Permit #92-48, both attached to this agreement. 3. Construction Plans; The following described detailed plans and specifications for the complete installation of the Improvements shall ^ be submitted by the Developer for the approval of the City prior to the start of construction. The Plans and specifications shall conform to all currrent City standards for all applicable work. 4, Construction of Improvements; A. Commencement Date - The construction of Improvements shall begin no later than _ _ _ _ _July 28, 1992_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ B. Completion Date - All Improvements shall be completed no later than October 1, 1992_ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _• Initials of Developer , Initials of City Clerk Page 2 of 7 C. Contractors ~ The Developer shall select# retain and supervise the Contractor (s) responsible for Improvement construction. The City reserves the right to require satisfactory proof of successful experience and adequate financial status of any such contractor. Where required by City ordinance, the contractor shall first obtain a license from the City. D. Preconstruction Conference - Prior to the start of any construction, the Developer and the Developer's Contractor shall meet with the responsible City official to review construction plans and schedules. E. Permits - Prior to the start of any construction, the Developer's Contractor shall apply for and receive all necessary permits from the City and/or government agencies having jurisdiction. F. Construction - The construction, installation and materials shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications approve! by the City. G. Insurance ~ The Developer will cause each person who constructs and installs any Improvement to maintain complete insurance coverage including Workmen's Compensation, Liability and Property Damage. 5. Performance Deposit: For the purposes of assuring to the City that the Improvements will be compi ,?ced according to the terms of this^ agreement, and that the Developer will pay all claims for work done and materials and supplies furnished, the Developer has deposited with the City at the time of the execution of this agreement an irrevoca e letter of credit in a form satisfactory to the City providing that the City is able to draw upon such letter of credit in its sole discretion to complete the Improvements if the Developer fails to satisfactorily complete the work prior to the completion date specified in Sect on above. The amount of such deposit shall not be reduced before substantial completion of the Improvements. The letter of shall expire no sooner than six months after the completion dat specified in Section 4 above, or no sooner than - - - - --- --- --- - - whichever is later. Initials of Developer , Initials of City Clerk Page 3 of 7 6. Fees and Expenses: The Developer agrees to pay all City fees required per the current City Fee Schedule and further agrees to completely reimburse the City for al3 the variable additional expenses it incurs in regard to the review and approval of the Improvements including, but not limited to, direct City payroll and overhead, costs, and fees paid to consultants and other professionals. 7. Resolutions of City; Developer agrees to be bound by the provisions set forth in all resolutions of the City Council approving the Development. 8. Binding Effect: The terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto and shall be binding deemed covenants running with the land. References herein to Developer, if there be more tnan one, shall mean each and all of them. This agreement to be executed by the Developer, shall be placed of record so as to give notice hereof to subsequent purchasers and incumbrancers of all or any part of the subdivision and all recording fees, if any, shall be paid by the Developer. 9. Notices: Whenever in this agreement it shall be required or permitted that notice or demand be given or served by either party to this agreement to or on the other party, such notice or demand shall be delivered personally or mailed by United States certified mail (return receipt requested) to the addresses set forth below. Such notice or demand shall be deemed timely given when delivered personally or when deposited in the mail in accordance with the above. Notice to City Notice to Develoner City of Orono Clerk/Administrator P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Howard Eisinaer 3245 Wavzata Blvd. Lone Lake, MN 55356 XO. Incorporation by Reference: All plans, special provisions, proposals, specifications and contracts for the Improvements furuxshed and let pursuant to this agreeemnt shall be and hereby are made a part of this agreement.by reference as fully as if set out herein in full. Initials of Developer Initials of City Clerk Page 4 of 7 11. Disclaimer bv City; It is understood and agreed that the City, the City Council, and the agents and employees of the City shall not be personally liable or responsible in any manner to the Developer or Developer's contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, laborers, or any other person, firm or corporation, for any debt, claim, demand, damages, actions, or causes of action of any kind or character, arising out of or by reason of the execution of this agreement or the performance and completion of the Improvements. 12. Hold Harmless and Indemnification; The Developer shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, the City Council, and the agents and employees of the City from and against all claims, damages, losses or expenses, including attorney fees, which the C.ty. City Council and agents and employees of the City may suffer or for which it may be held liable, arising out of or resulting from the assertion against them of any claims, debts or obligati->ns in consequence Oi. whe performance of this agreement by the Developer, its employees, agents or subcontractors, whether or not caused in part by a party indemnified hereunder. 13. Remedy for Default: Default by the Developer of any of the terms of this agreement shall automatically result in the suspension or withholding of all permits, licenses, occupancy certificates or other authorizations issued by the City in connection with the property included in this development. A. The Developer hereby grants to the City, its agents and^ its employees, the right to enter on the property for the specific purpose of constructing or completing any and all of the agreed^ upon Improvements should the Developer not complete those Improvements by the date specified in Section 4-B. B. xhe remedies afforded to the City under this Section shall be in addition to any other remedies to which the City may be entit’ ^d by law or other agreement. Initials of Developer Initials of City Clerk Page 5 of 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Subdivider have caused this agreement to be duly executed on the day and first above written. CITY OF ORONO ting Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA /^(city Cl^r^) ) ss. COUNTY OF .TENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged-^e^re^ tl day of __________________, 19</ 7 , bv ..ajrw.. » w- j w-- • ^ municipa’i corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. DEVELOPER JAMIE LBOSMA notary PUBUC-MINNESOTA HENNEPtN COUNTY M>; Ccmm. Excift j 12-19-97 «i ■ j) ^ fv M />^ v/^y/C <iL^ Notar^^ublic And; 7^T STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss . COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this <?k day of O''-<■ y y , 199<P. before me a Notary "public wichin and for sai<f county, personally appeared r marr;<.W _________________ known to me to be the person(s) d4scribed in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. P3S UN DA S. VEE__1 , notary RUBUC - MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY V My oo«w»«M*oo *BP(f*9 9-U-Wi / //, NOTARY PUBLIC Page 6 cf 7 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) } ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of ______________________, 199__, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (thexr) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Reviewed for Administration: Date:By (City Official) This document has been drafted by: City of Orono 1335 South Brown Road P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 I Page 7 of 7 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ___3108 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDTIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISIONS 19 & 20 FILE #1722 WHEREAS, Howard F. Eisinger (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of property at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: PID: 32-118-23 14 0002 Section 32, Township 118, Range 23, commencing at a point in the East line of Government Lot 1 distance 393.24 feet South along said linf’ from the South line of State Highway No. 12 thence at right angles West from said East line 418 feet thence at right angles North 393.02 feet to South line of highway thence West along said highway line to West line of said Lot 1 thence South along said West ine to Northerly line of Great Northern Railroad right-of-way th :e Southeasterly along said right-of-way line to East line of > it 1 thence North to beginning (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the a’^plicant has applied to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit to permit the filling of 10,000 cubic yards of clean fill over a former dump site of approximately 12 acres per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19 and 20. All filling activities shall take place 35' from the adjacent wetlands at the 972 elevation. NOW, THEREFOR! . BE IT RESOJ ED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1722. The property is located in the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District. 3. m On June 8, 1987, the Orono Council approved application 11103 granting a permit to the applicant to allow the filling of 100,000 cubic yards of clean fill per the conditions set forth in Resolution #2197. Pace 1 of 6 Lii CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3108 4. 5. 6. On October 24, 1988, the Orono Council approved application #1310, a renewal conditional use permit that would allow filling based on conditions set forth in Resolution #2526. On March 16, 1992, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the application as amended and recommended unanimous approval of the application based on the following findings: A) The current proposal will have no negative impact on the surrounding wetlands or intersecting drainageway. B) The adjacent property owners have been advised of the applicant's proposal and none have voiced objection or submitted written opposition to the City. C) The application as modified by the Planning Commission will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vacinity. D) During the review of the two earlier conditional use oermits, Braun Engineering, in a letter dated May 28, 1987, has opined as follows regarding the placement of approximately 100,000 cubic yards of fill over a former dump site. • • •_it is our opinion that the addition of 5' of fill over the area presents a very slight risk of embankment failure." E) The current application (#1722) shall involve the filling of 10,000 cubic yards of clean fill. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the filling of 10,000 cubic yards of clean fill as approved by the City Engineer, will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, woulcf not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the Pace 2 of 6 CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 3108NO. proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 7. The City Council has considered this renewal application as amended including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono Ciuy Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19 & 20 to permit the placing of 10,000 cubic yards of fill as approved by the City Engineer, subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. Prior the hauling of fill to the site, the applicant or applicant's agent must submit a filling and grading plan for the City Engineer's review. Such plan shall adhere to the following guidlines: A) B) C) Side slopes 5:1 ratio; 1% slope to be maintained within inner fill area Silt fence installed 30-35' from wetland at 972 elevation - no land alterations allowed within 26' of wetl/ind; Executed developer's agreement and appropriate security to ensure final grading and seeding if fill project is not completed . Fill shall not exeed allowed amount of 10,000 cubic yards. Side slopes to be graded and seeded periodically during the course of the project. The Orono staff is to advise applicant or applicant's agent when seeding is to be conducted. "" Pace 3 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3108________ 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. The applicant shall be responsible for advising the City of the schedule of hauling activities so that staff can arrange for the necessary inspections. Prior to hauling any fill to the site, the applicant must arrange for a pre-construction meeting with the Orono staff to review all final submittals and tentative hauling schedule. The City will ask that a representative of its Police Department be present at the pre —construction meeting to advise of . any special traffic/safety concerns during the hauling process. Hauling activities shall not be conducted during the following time periods: 6:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. The applicant shall cease all hauling to the site upon evidence of shearing and/or other signs of instability created by filling over the former dump site. Applicant shall not proceed with hauling until the City Engineer^ has had adequate time to review the evidence and submit a written report to the Council for their review and action. If Council determines that it is in the public interest to cease all hauling to the site, this conditional use permit shall be terminated immediately and the applicant shall complete the final grading and seeding of the entire disturbed area. Applicant is responsible for up-dating all previous permits issued by the Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Hennepin County Department of Environment and Engineering, and M.C.W.D. before the Orono staff can issue a land alteration permit. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the owner, but are permissive only and the filling of the site must commence within one year of the date of Council's approval (April 13, 1993). The land alteration permit shall be valid for a two year period. The alteration permit shall be written to specify the specific time restrictions on this permit. Page 4 of 6 CITY of ORONO 'Jh Vr,RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3^0^_________ 9.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 10.The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 13th day of April, allin. City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor *7: Piroperty Owner(s)a (y STATE OP MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13th day of April, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota munic-.pal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. CAROLE A HASaiW HENNCMI COUNTY m ooMuaoN arra Notary Public ' Page 5 of 6 I CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.3108 )STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this ) ss. day of /?/) r.' ^ ^ in___________4 199 ^ beforf me a Notary PubUc within and tor said county, personally appeared fersokfs ^4650^^/an and who executed tne ^r™oinrir.strument,'^and acknowledged that he (they) executed the s'ame as his (their) free act and deed. LINDA S. VEE notary PUBUC • MINNESOTA^ h Sinepin county My oommistton «jcplras S-I24i6 F MINNE _ ) SS . S»«K^fc:<nF MTNNfsUT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) 199;? . before^m e a N^ary PubTTc'^Sithin and fcr'^Kli'd county, p^rsongriy appeared /r p^l m /-/<..^appeared ------(\i^h jf’^ in and who executed tne “goTng"\ns°trient,^ard acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. yf / /\/j Notary Public Paqe 6 of 6 RESOLUTION ##3108 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO roregolng copy of a *■" '*’*<ith the original record at a meeting of aald City Council held proceedings of said City ou loqo and that the same is a true ;n%-7^7i:T^T^fft^^^iTd^^lutio^s- duly adopted hy said City Council at said meeting. Witness Whereof. I hove hereunto set my hand and seal this ■ 14th . day of i- - -&S£ll - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - (SEAL) w SV11I\!I\1EHAHA CR^EK W/ATERSHED DISTRICT 6 ^.0. Box 387, Wayzata. Minnesota 55391 iJAftO OF MANAGERS: James R. Spensley Pres. • John £. Thomas • Richard R. Miller )6ed 0 EncKson • C Woodrow Love • Clarkson Lindley • Thomas Maple. Jr, Permit Application No. 92-48 : July 15, 1992 Applicant: Howard Eisinger 3245 Wayzata Blvd. Long Lake, MN 55356 Location: City of Orono, Sec. 32BD, south of Hwy 12 and west of Stubbs Bay Road Purpose: Stormwater management plan for placement of approximately 10,000 cubic yards of nil on an abandoned landfill site. Dear Mr. Eisinger: Receipt is acknowledged for the following which you have submitted as pan of the above permit application: 1. Plan revised July 10, 1992. This plan is in accordance with the action taken by the Board of Managers on May 21, 1992 in reference to the above permiL This letter is your permit from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed Districu Permit approval is based upon the following exhibits: 1. Permit Application 92-48 received April 6, 1992. 2. Letter from the applicant to the District dated April 6, 1992. 3. MCWD Permit File No. 74-9. 4. MCWD Permit File No. 87-38. 5. Letter from the DNR to the applicant dated March 31,1992. 6. Site improvement plan dated March 31, 1987. 7. Letter from the District to the applicant dated April 20, 1992 informing him of the Board action April 16, 1992. 8. Letter from the applicant to the District dated April 29, 1992. 9. Revised site plan a cross section received April 29, 1992. 10. Letter from the District to the applicant dated May 27, 1992 informing him of die Board action on May 21, 1992. 11. Plan revised July 10,. 1992. Pciinl? Application No. 92-48 Page Two July 15. 1992 ■U' 6 STATE BANK OF LONG LAKE 1964 VV V/AYZATA BLVD • P O. BOX 636 l::ng lake. Minnesota 55356k:s36 • 6iZ'473-7347 Date; July 22, 1992 To: City of Oroiio p. o. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 we open irrevocable standby Letter of Credit No. 072292 in the Mount of U. S. dollars 55,000, in favor of yourselves, for the account of Howard Eisinger. Expires July 22na. 1993, at our counters. , ^ , L^ilable against drafts dra-wn at sight on State Bank of Long Lake, Howard rtsinger's project, bearing the clause, "Drawn under^Standby Letter of Credit No. 072292 at the State Bank of Long Lake. ^ A beneficiary's signed statement stating: "Howard Ersinger has failed to make certain payments required to be made for improvements or to complete the improvements to the satis faction of the city, pursuant to the City Permxt, concerning Howard Eisinger's project, between the City of *rono and Howard Eisinger. 2. This original Letter of Credit for endor-'sment. Special Condition(s) : 1 This Letter of Credit is automatically renewable without amendment for an additional six-month period from the present expiry date or any future expiry date, unless sixty (60) days prior to said expiry date, we shall notify you in writing, by registered mail that we have elected not to renew this Letter of credit, huL in no event shall the expiry date extend beyond July 22, '993. , . Payment will be made at tne cou er of the Bank of Long Lake, Thi., credit is subject to the u'.v'.form custr-s and practice for documentary. Unless otherwise stated, all uocuments are to be forwarded tc us b/ mail or hand delivered to our counters. Documents to be directed to: State Bank of Long Lake, 1S64 West Wayzata Boulevard. Long Lako, Mil 55356. We hereby engage with drawers and/or bona fide holders that and negotiated in conformity with the terms of this credit will be duly honored upon presentation, State Bank of Lake, Long Lake, Minnesota av \ 1 ' *' >- I Marcia Plotnik, AdsttStant ViCb President ' A RJlC StnviCE \QA.NK, < ConiiouOJi Banning smca i905 FDli ;.;-t: 5905853 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3108 _ A RESOLDTION GRANTING A CONDTIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISIONS 19 & 20 FILE #1722 WHEREAS, Howard F. Eisinyer (hereinai-ter "the applicant") is the owner of property at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: PID; 32-118-23 14 0002 Section 32, Township 118, Range 23, commencing at a point in the East line of Government Lot 1 distance 393.24 feet South along said line from the South line of State Highway No. 12 thence at right angles West from said East line 418 feet thence at right angles North 393.02 feet to South line of highway thence West along said highway li 'e to West line of said Lot 1 thence South along said West line to Northerly line of Great Northern Railroad right-of-way thence Southeasterly along said right-of-way line to East line of Lot 1 thence North to beginning (hereinafter "property"); anJ WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono tor a conditional use permit to permit the filling of 10,000 cubic ^aids of clean fill over a former dump site of approximately 12 acres per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19 and 20. All filling activities shall ta)ce place 35' from the adjacent wetlands at the 972 elevation. NOW, THEREIOR.E, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. 2. 3. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1722. The property is located in the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District. On June 8, 1987, the Orono Council approved application #1103 granting a permit to the applicant to allow the fillino of 1 (j 0 ,0 0 0 cubic yards of clean fill per the rRANSFBR forth in Resolution #2197. T.OfMOMRTCTW IPUSUCWECOWK ^ i r rPace 1 of 6 APR 29 1992 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _________ 4. 5. 6. On October 24, 1988, the Orono Council approved application #1310, a renewal conditional use permit that would allow filling based on conditions set forth in Resolution #2526. On March 16, 1992, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the application as amended and recommended unanimous approval of the application based on the following findings? A) The current proposal will have no negative impact on the surrounding wetlands or intersecting drainageway. B) The adjacent property owners have been advised of the applicant's proposal and none have voiced objection or submitted written opposition to the City. C) The application as modified by the Planning Commission will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vacinity. D) During the review of the two earlier conditional use permits, Braun Engineering, in a letter dated May 28, 1987, has opined as follows regarding the placement of approximately 100,000 cubic yards of fill over a former dump site. "...it is our opinion that the addition of 5' of fill over the area presents a very slight risk of embankment failure." E) The current application (#1722) shall involve the filling of 10,000 cubic yards of clean fill. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the filling of 10,000 cubic yards of clean fill as approved by the City Engineer, will not be detrimental to the health# safety or general welfare of t e public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the Page 2 of 6 CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 3108NO. 1. proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. *». The City Council has considered this renewal application as amended including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety und welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19 & 20 to permit the placing of 10,000 cubic yards of fill as approved by the City Engineer, subject to the following conditions: Prior the hauling of fill to the site, the applicant or applicant's agent must submit a filling and grading plan for the City Engineer's review. Such plan shall adhere to the following guidlines: A) Side slopes 5:1 ratio; B) 1% slope to be maintained within inner fill area? C) Silt fence installed 30-35' elevation - no land alterations allowed witnin 2o of wetland; Executed developer's agreement and appropriate security to ensure final grading and seeding if fill project is no completed. Fill shall not exeed allowed amount of Side slopes to be graded and seeded periodically during the course of the project. The Orono staff is to advise applicant or applicant's agent when seeding is to be conducted. 2. 3. Pace 3 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3108________ 5. 6. 4. The applicant shall be responsible for advising the City of the schedule of hauling activities so that staff can arrange for the necessary inspections. Prior to hauling any fill to the site, the applicant must arrange for a pre-construction meeting with the Orono staff to review all final submittals and tentative hauling schedule. The City will ask that a representative of its Police Department be present at the pre-construction meeting to advise of any special traffic/safety concerns during the hauling process. Hauling activities shall not be conducted during the following time periods: 6:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. The applicant shall cease all hauling to the site upon evidence of shearing and/or other signs of instability created by filling over the former dump site. Applicant shall not proceed with hauling until the City Engineer^ has had adequate time to review the evidence and submit a written report to the Council for their review and action. If Council determines that it is in the public interest to cease all hauling to the site, this conditional use permit shall be terminated immediately and the applicant shall complete the final grading and seeding of the entire disturbed area. 7. Applicant is responsible for up-dating all previous^ permits issued by the Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Hennepin County Department of Environment and Engineering, and M.C.W.D. before the Orono staff can issue a land alteration permit. 8. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the propeity not with the*owner, but are permissive only and the filling of the site must commence within one year of the date of Council's approval (April 13, 1993). The land alteration permit shall be valid for a two year period. The alteration permit shall be written to specify the specific time restrictions on this permit. Page 4 of 6 1 i\0» ^ CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3108 _ _ _ 9 Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 10. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 13th day of April, Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foreqoing instrument was ^^knowledged before me on this 13th day of April,' 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson Dorothy ^ ^ Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, ^ corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf ct tne y. CAROIE A. HASEMAN NOTAffr n«UO-4M«IOTA HENNCPtN COUNTY 0n f j O ■ Notary Public Page 5 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 3108NO. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) On this _ _/ 3 ) ) ss. day of r.‘ I 199 ^ befor^me " Personal ly appeared —tTJrqQnls) described in and who executeci tne “oTng"ins\rumenb,^'nd acknowledged that he (they) executed TV ‘iS.S^NOTABH^PUBUcf - M^NESOTA ° HENNEPIN COUN;^ My comfttl««oo #-t2^ 6f MINNS"''"" ') ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On thisbefore\e a h'^y^PuDlTc'^tithfn and for"K'r'g councy, ^ersonarxy ADPI 199^y appeared ---- iTi/rfi P./7 scribed in and who executeo tne fS°r?go\“ng"'\ns°trumentrand acknowledged that he (they) executed the same ai his (their) free act and deed. CAROUAjHWlE^^Notary Public Pace 6 of 6 C"C G 9cn#«rtJO C -V'orf » <»► M4r^«n L Sorva’J ffcr*JfT3 E Tuf'*?'’ <*£ Gc'^'^ <? Coc« PE Tncf^s E \c>*i P£ ffoOf^T O Scrruricrif PE Suun M £Cff^«n C PA »c^ !f> A Oa'don PE PcKf» P£ Jffr/ A Scu'CCO 0£ Varfc A Hinson P£ DlV'»i O LOSkCfJ **£ PcCfT C Russell A I A A Sinfcyo. **£ OoniK) 'I Burgjost PE ><3 K FrkJ Pi T Riotrr^rn P£ RiXe-'t R PE Thomas W Prrerion Pi \*<na?t C Lvncn P£ James R Va'and PE Kfr.*~e!h P Anderson PE ? Ro:^ PE Trcmas £ Ar^j. P£ Oar«H j Ejgrrcyy Pi MjrK A Sra P£ P**!o j CjsvveR PE Ismael Vartre;. **£ Mane 0 'A;»*v Pi Thomas R AnOenon A I A Gary P Ryiarde^ *»£ MJes B -«ensen p£ L Pn.iiip Grave* n PE Re-f C P‘L.maf! A 1 A A^-ei V Rn;j. .A IC P Jerry O Pervsen Pi CfC'o C’ive' PE Ga'y vv Mo< en P£ Karen L Wemen PE Ketrt ? Yaoo P£ p Pju Pi Cna"es A £f<»tso». Leo M Pawvrstry Haran M C'son u . * .• t • • » MAR 1 1 1932 C Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects March 10, 1992 City of Orono Box 66 Ciystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Jeanne Mabusth Re: Howard Eisinger Conditional Use Permit Application #1722 Our File No. 139-1722 Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the renewal conditional use permit for Mr. Eisinger. It is our understanding the permit is for 10.000 cubic yards of fill material. We recommend it be placed in the low areas to level the site area. The additional material up to the 10,000 cu.yds. being placed should be uniformly installed over the entire fill area. Seed re.storation of the site should be completed immediately to help prevent erosion. If we may be of any funher assistance, please contact me. Yours very truly, BONESTROO' ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. ( * Harlan M. Olson HMO:li l39.cor 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul. Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects Orro G PL ftotxn W fiosere PE • Joseph C Aro^’H PE L Srr\,id PE PE G<nn R Coo^ PE r^ct^as E Ncv^^ PE G PE Suwn M Et^.in C PA •Senor Comu<tan| ►'KTAard A Sjr*c»d PE A GorOcn Pt ffoCrrt R PV^fie P£ P A' P£ L'j. J O Lc\«*:fj P£ RcCert C Ruise« A i A Jffry A BoonJon PE A Hj^von PE T Rautn'ann P£ Ted »( F-ei<3 PE Thon>a\ P Af\3efW>n A I A Ocnaid C Bi^'^a'Ct PE Thomas E Ar^i, P£ »sma^ Ma^tin^/ PE M<^afH P S4U PE R^ AlCP Thcynas W Prtprson Pf r i,fxr! PE Jjmrs 9 Va jn/j P£ Jerry D PffT/vcn PE Kenneth P ArxJefson PE R Re's PE Ma'« A >t) PE Gary 'A/ Monen P£ Dan^ j Edge^oh PE Dary. K K /v*'enman P£ Philip J Caswe*! PE Mam O Oa*iiv PE M )es B ensen Pi L PhiLtp Graven in PE Kaieo L W*emen PE Gary D ***:cyc; P£ F -ocj cc«ef P£ Ke-m R rapo PE Shawn o Gu'.ta'son l Crr to C \^f PE Chartrs A Er<nson Leo M Pawrisky N^ftan M Olson F Enge^hana: October 14. 1992 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Building & Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Ciystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Howard Eisingei Conditional Use Permit Our File No. 139-1766 Jiis C:TV 0= C.~C''C ElIZG^ OCT 1.5 ^992 Dear Jeanne: VVe have reviewed the applicants request to place 20,000 cubic yards of fill on his property located south of Trunk Highway 12 and west of Old Crv'stal Bay Road. Tlie site has been filled previously and can reasonably accommodate the additional fill material. We recommend that the applicant identify the borrow location of the proposed fill and the schedule of the filling operations. The fill area edges along the marsh and adjacent upl.ind area should be dre.ssed up, finish graded and seeded within the next month. Tl' ^ additional fill material should be placed in the center of this fill area to allow re-vegetation of the edges. Silt fencing should be maintained along these edges until the entire site has been re-vegetated. We recommend a Mn/DOT mixture number 700 seed be used for seeding the disturbed aieas. Any future requests for fill on the applicant’s property should be closely scrutinized. Tlie area may not accommodate much more fill before it begins to stand out from the existing topography. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions. Yours very truly, BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERl IK & ASSOCIAIES, INC. Jdet^ n h. Shawn D. Gustafson. P.E. SDGdh 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 7 To: From: Date: Subject: Chairman Kelley and Planning Commissi Mayor Peterson ind City Council ^ Ron MoorsOf City Administrator Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager % ^October 12, 1992 #1772 James Brooks, 3785 Watertown Road - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-IA, Single Family Rural Residential, 5 acre minimum Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.27, SuL’. 5 (B) - Side yard setback variance. Required = 50' Existing three-season porch Proposed three-season porch Variance =17' or 34% 33' 33' List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Survey E - Proposed Porch Plan F - Detail Survey Description of Request The applicant requests permission to replace the existing three-season porch which is in disrepair due to the lack of a foundation. The porch replacement will not expand the building envelope as it will have the same dimensions as the previous porch. Access traffic for the replacement of the porc’.i should be directed around the oast side of the house to avoic. the septic syi^tem which is west and south of the house. The drainfield area must be staked prior to construction to assure that no traffic will pass over the drainfield regardless of the access. Hardship Statement This parcel is zoned RR-IA with a side yard setback of 50' and this lot being only 109.1' wide is severely limited. Please note that the porch replacement will not encroach any further into the side yard setback nor will it expand the building envelope. Zoning File #1772 October 21. 1992 Page 2 Additional Comments and Planning Commission Recommendations The Planning Commission unanimously approved the side setback variance for the reconstruction of the existing 3-season porch. The enclosed approval resolution is presented for Council's reviev* and action. Isv i J i A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.27, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) PILE #1772 WHEREAS, James Brooks (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the property located at 3785 Watertown Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Refer to Exhibit A, attached (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.27, Subdivision 5(B) to permit the reconstruction of a three-season porch at the southwest corner of the principal structure. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota; FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1772, 2. The property is located in the RR-IA, Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring 5 acres in area . 3. The Orono Planning Commission j viewed this application on October 19, 1992 and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings and hardst' .'S:* A. The zoning standards of the RR-lA zoning district require a 300' width. The subject property measur 109.1' and is severly restricted by 5 acre se ck standards. B. The zoning district requires a 50' side setback. The principal structure is located 33' from the side lot line. The three-season porch extends no closer into the substandard side setback yard. Page 1 of 4 C. The existing building envelope of the three-season porch will not be expanded upon but will be rebuilt within the same building envelope. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply 9'^nerally to other property in this zoning district? that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City sta^^. comments by the applicant and the effect ov ch' variances on the health, safety and welfare of the cc'Tunun' CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.27, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the reconstruction of a three-season porch located at the southwest corner of the existing principal structure, subject to the following conditions; 1. Drainfield area located to the west and south of the existing residence must be staked prior to construction to assure that no traffic will disturb drainfield area. 2. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, jt this variance will expire on that date (October ?«, 993). Page 2 of 4 3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the roning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4, The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 26th day of October, 1992. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OP MINNESOTA ) ) GS. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 26th day of October 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Pago 3 of 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ^^"own to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199 , before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 4 of 4 CITY OK ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION vn-'^Site Address (jJ L^(a.v »V Oi.C nrv nr nonun uj t I CYifMfrc nccrrc t X u ui t A L. &. i • *v* i V'V W\/ • n1 m\ f7r i rbrri^* n irr yuia.cn I i. .i I u• V OCrCTuT^TUAtik'^ Vf^l f $ttn$u% i wu iivicvov.'i iv»fuv\/.A nwA la 09/2. Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) OCO^- Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: / residential _ _ _other(specify) Zoning District: _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT Name l^rv.oolcs ______________ Phone (home) ^0^7 Phone (work) Address: UJ(>ja-C3^uV\ 2jl . City: } g(/A___ Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ^ ^_____ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ ^ S^o5oa> po ReU / O, OOO Describe request in detail VARIANCES REQUIRED ___ Lot Area Setback : Lot Width Front ^ Side Hardcover Hear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) IIARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property ioo* U»vi^ ----^ ----f -------- io Vun etf ii ^ K*r^ / ^ —>--------^-4----------------- r (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete; 1. % Completed Application Form 2. k Cercified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. ^ Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. K Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8*5"xll" for reproduction). 5. _Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8%"xll"). 6. X Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%"xll"). 7. _As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. _Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to pro'i^ide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review oi this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her )cnowledge. Applicant's Signature 0 Date vT. m OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackov^edges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga- unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to adv'ise the Building s Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. RW DATE 06/17/92 BATCH 005PROP ADOR OIA4ER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR 0»«ER NAME taxpayer NAME/AOOR HENNEPIN COWITY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM .PROPERTY OMNERS LISTJ8 05-117-23 21 0002 03750 BAVSIOE RD /OHN BURGER ETAL JOHN BURGER 3750 BAYSIOE RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 58 32-110-23 31 0005 03760 HATERTOHN RD CATHARINE A CRAM CATHARINE A CRAM 3760 H/TERTOIIN RD MAPLE PLAIN LUJ 55359 38 05-117-23 22 0001 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO STATE OF MINN STATE OF MINN (ONRI (LUCE LINE TRAIL I 38 32-110-23 32 0005 03850 HATERTCMN RO S M « C A HARRIS STEVEN M HARRIS 335 TURHAH RO maple PLAIN MN 55359 REPORT NO. PI<V35'»01 PACE 1158 05-117-23 22 001000055 LANDMARK DR VICKIE J ROSS VICKIE J ROSS 55 LANDMARK DR LONG LAKE ttti 55356 38 32-1J8-23 33 0002 03785 HATERTOHN RD 'MES F BROOKS JANES F BROOKS 3705 HATERTOHN ROAD maple plain MN -5559 PROP AOOR OFffLER NAME taxpayer NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR OHNER NAME taxpayer NAME/AOOR 38 32-118-23 33 0009 03855 HATERTOHN RO CATHARINE A CRAM CATHARINE A CRAM 3760 HATERTOHN RO MAPLE PLAIN tV4 55359 TOTAL BATCH 005 00009 38 32-118-23 39 0012 03793 HATERTOHN RO NED L BUTTERFIELD NEO L BUTTERFIELD 3795 HATERTOHN RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 32-118-23 59 0013 03765 HATERTOHN RO GERDA L KENNEDY LARRY L COOK 3765 HATERTOHN RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 * L* • J •, 3 i mm OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEk. ^ ^ PROPER^JAXATION. TO BEST DAI * / *fc' • ‘ 4 i I » • • • #: j /^i i! • ^ f? N S I;c *< ;V “.5 ) •u>»s '.'i Av V; 4 «• Cerwlflcdwcof Survey for J^nes F. Brooks in t^e SWV, of the SWTt of Section 32-110-P3 Hennepin County. Minnesota 1 hereby certify that this Is a t *ue and correct representation of a Survey of the boundaries of *'hal part of the Southwest quarter of tfie Soul «west quarter of Section 32. Toi«nship llB North. Pange 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as follows; Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter, thence north along the East line of said Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter a dis tance of M97.83 feet to the centerline of Watertown Poad (for- inorly County Road 45), tnence nortfv^esterly along said center line of Watertown Pcjf) a distance of M8.8 feet. ther<ce south and parallel to the East line of said Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter a distance of 1242.93 feet wore or less to tf>e South lir.e of said Section 32; thence east along the South line of said Section 32. a distance of 109.1 feet to the point of beginning, and the location of an existing house thereon. It does not purport to show jny other improve«ents or encroach ments. COFFIN i GPGNBFPG. INC. Harx 5. Orofiberg Wri. Lie? ^*0," 12/5S Engineers. Land Surveyors, Planners Long Lake. Minnesota hfte 5-'2-88 Scale: r . 100’ 0 . Iron marker iSf $g m4 V 04 44,t f—^ *W mf MM -r' •*•«— ^ t . • ^ • ^ j ^ .»» % - — Cc/.'Jf. r^r A'lifri t-'io’iL n **;JL-o_/_ L'' ■fe 1 i' " 1r j 1. 1 tnV'- i_j •1 t 1 1 —!M !l• J i 17 ‘SCi'i'SotL p 2,0. P'‘r-* A •« 7-.‘‘w- ^ h~,** ftir- — 5** wO/L /^C9^'‘'ir — flc<.> i£0££ “ RJOtOeao fVri» ~~'"'-j — ScFt | ( plVi.r--------1 £yTgriO(L ' V M {jj p t. L C — V^“ - - VN ir^tc. r:'.-;(^0 6 ^/C/a .' ~ <J~ir,inn % ' cccr^L - ij-a; — 5'A" P(i5??6£^*>; /A<<. • •' !n^, an/ — */>/*>po/* «c»(ri»fZ_ - )*4TSf7/C/l. miin TO V‘<v a Vm” C*»Drt(C !• • I } -i II I f cq> ‘.V ‘O, • **>3 '^p:2!2r- » f * iN* Mn ti I V)r< a a. Pi I Ci O vl « 3 C |vi0 i''p»a riv^T/.uS HouSt Oooii. •' !‘/m” C&Ohi^ CSC'clWG, THK.006rtovjr ^ ; 7iT -- 9 1^ I I « II-------1 , ’ ‘ ‘ 1 ,' I 'll' 1 Coy%vi ^’''o '______* rA I I I I I 1 5>8 Ftooa no<^^ l<*" O.C., n Vi I --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- L .....' —Ts -zrz:-------^ -4- iU'TSiDt DivCK - _._ J: CIS'S, LVlat. > - '« <0' f 3» lf^ f !? t /» -I 70 co or rr a CA- oc X i/' 13 O O c o '-£• ir» !.. ‘ > p,<?. o r© s A \ ■ \ , TO:Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorser City Administrator FROM:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Admin^^^toi^ October 22, 1992 SUBJECT: Draft Letters of Response - Flexibility Requests DATE: Attached is a draft letter of response to be sent to the Cities of Minnetonka Beach» Spring Park# Tonka Bay, Wayzata, and Woodland regarding their flexibility requests. At your October 12th meeting. Council generally indicated that Orono should respond with a show of support for these cities' efforts rather than dissect the specific proposed code elements with which Orono may philosophically disagree to a minor or major extent. LMCD Representative Hurr suggested that perhaps Orono should take a more strict stand on the issue of hardcover related to commercial and high density residential development. Certain *:ities are proposing ordinances which would allow development and redevelopment with hardcover in excess of 75% under certain conditions. Hurr suggested that it no adjacent cities oppose this the DNR will be in a weaker position to disallow such provisions. I have taken a middle-of-the- road approach in addressing this issue. Staff Recommendation Please review the draft generic letter and accept it, modify it, or give staff further direction. Mayor Re: Shoreland Flexibility Request Dear Mayor _____: The Orono City Council has reviewed your proposed Shoreland Flexibility Request and has no objection to any of the specific elements. We applaud your efforts to adhere to the DNR requirements while struggling with the ongoing problem of existing non-conforming development. We would encourage our sister cities in the Lake Minnetonka community to carefully review new development and redevelopment when it occurs, and make every effort to minimize the impact of development on the Lake, especially by limiting impervious surfaces to the greatest possible extent, as well as by requiring appropriate storm water runoff quality control measures. Sincerely, Barbara A. Peterson Mayor BAP/ch J'!JMil Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects 4 \1iVI1 OfTo G dorrMrtjo Ft P Ir'f* X PE * ,‘ovph C « PE Varviri L Sc»V4§U P£ E PE Q‘r''r\ 9 Clx'« PE . PE Fcvrrr G S«.nun<hl PE M CPA •*’^r(y Cor':>Aartt Hcvs joJ A iinEbrj Pf »r :• * Gw/‘^r PE P P^»*pr^ PE ‘.V PC DrfvwJ O t '■••::,♦ Pf ®OC>rr1 C fluiV* ArA .e"y A Pf Mjfit A H»jnson PF T P.rjrrr^Jtr>n PE Teci K fr rJ PE Thcrrji V Arv.JefW>n A i Donald C Bufq^inlt PC f A' ; PF Pf p Pju PE A.^rr V P"; A CP f^rnii ‘Jt Pftr'son P£ M<hjf C Ly^h P£ p »fVJ Pf 0 Prtu-ur> PE P *r' Je^vor- Pf Mjf% R Prr^ Mrfffc A >»p Gjr> vV Sioffn J CJ^rvl K Kt*\cf'>enryjtn P^’ M Pv 8 ,ersen Pfc L P* p O r.** " PC H4Tn L pf Gjry D P£ f r-.^^ P? Aritn iJ P£ ir«rAr! D Gw>:a^ion I Crc 'w O rv^ P£ A frirlrsno Lro V P.tv^'.f f Mjf jr- *,! G '^r f Erg^arjt October 6, 1992 City of Oronr Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Mr. John Gerhaiilson Rc: 400/J00 Gallon lilcvated Tank Our File No. 13954 Dear John: Enclosed herewith aie three signed copies of Request for Payment No. 3 for the above referenced project. I he request is in the amount of $179,464.50 and includes payment primarily for the tank erection. We I’ave reviewed this request and find it to be in order. We therefore recommend payment to PDM, Inc. in the amount of $179,464.50. Flense call me if you have any questions. Verv Tnilv Yours, tf # BONESTROO. ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. / end 13954 cor 2335 \Wpst Highway 36 • St. Paul. Minnesota 551 13 • 6l2-636-*600 iht Bonrstfoo Owner C ity of CJrono, 1335 Itrown Rd S, PO Box 66, Ciystal, MN 55323 Dale Scpl. 21, l‘>92 m V Amlerlfk A |\!| AstoiiJtei rVriod August 21, l‘>‘C to September 14, P<‘>2 Kequc.sl No. 3 U Kwruwuj (\)ntra4:(()r Pitt-Des Moines, Ine., PO Box 15%, Des Moines, lA 50.306 RliOUIvS*! I ()R I*AYMI:N’I’ 400,000 CJallon ItIcvaUil Water Storage Tank l-ile No. 13054 SUMMARY 1 Original Contract Amount 2 Change Order - Addition 3 Change Order - Deduction 4 Revised (.'ontract Amount 5 Value (’ompicted to Date 6 Material on Hand 7 Amount Harned 8 Le.ss Ketainage 5% 9 Sub-'lbtal 10 Le.ss Amount Paid Previously U AMOUN T DUli 11 US Rl£OUliS“T FOR PAY.M1£N I NO, $ $ Recommended for Approval by; DONiiS’mcx), rosf :nl ; anduruk & ASScx:iAn-:s, inc . 3 Approved by Contractor: m’l - Di:s MOINJ-S, fNC. Approved by Owner; CUT OF- orono. mn 595,150.00 s 595,150.00 $425,355.00 s 0.00 $425,355.00 $21.267.75 s 404.087.25 s 224,622.75 $179,464.50 Specified C'ontract Completion Date; Nt)vi Mill R 30, 1V02 Date: IJv^ t RH‘ No.Item Uail Conl/act Quanlily Unit Pi ice QuaflUty Ici Dale Aniouol To Dale Pill A ■ 400,000 nnicd Poluinn or Hyiifopillar Water Tower 141.0 feel to I liult Water ! cvcl I*'uruish aud itL^tall a complete elevated water storage tank of the Muted column or hydroptllar design with 4(K).0()0 gallon capacity within 39 feet of the high water level including: 1 l‘'oundatinu drawings 2 i'ank drawings 3 Access road 4 Filmg 5 Concrete foundation 6 Piping 7 Tank fabrication 8 Tank erection 9 niectrical 10 Painting 11 Cathodic protection system 12 Sitework fotal Uid A Pid A • Unit Price 13 Poundation piling unit price for dilference between design and actual total pile leugth • VOID; modified by Change Order No. 1 pid A • Allernale No 1 14 Furnish «& install a 5* x 7* double door m lieu of sjHreif. V x T |>edeslrtaii door li>1 5.400.00 1005^5,400.00 US 1 1 b.:oo.oo 100%16,200.00 IS 1 18,400.00 100%18,400.00 IS I 58,350.00 100%58.350.00 IS 1 31,600.00 100%31,^8)0.00 IS 1 4,800.00 100%4,800.00 IS 192,000.00 95%182,400.00 IS 1 113,900.00 95%108.205.00 \s 1 73,500.00 IS 1 70,‘X)0.00 IS 1 4,800.00 ts 1 23(81.00 $592,150.00 $425,355.00 u-20.00 ADD I-F 3.00 Di;Durr LS 3.000 00 SO.OO iJ'iM ki p KP I Itrm Unit CoDliik:! Ouantily Unit l*fiix Ouanliiy 111 Dale Amount To Date Change Order No. I Bid A • Unit Price 15 l*oundalion piling unit price for dirfereiicc belwceu approved design and actual total pile length in lieu of $20/Ll* ADD for add’l length and S3/IJ" DEDUCI' for reduced length 16 boundation piling unit price for each pile over 80 feet in length Total Change Order No. 1 LF (10)SI 0.00 (10) UA I $100.00 1 (100.00) lD0i)Q_ $0.00 Total Bid A Unit Price Alternate No. 1 Total Change Order No. 1 Total Work Completed to Date 425J55.00 0.00 0.00 ___non S415,355.00 13954 Kl P UP 2 PUOJI-Cr PAYMIOT yiA'llJS Owner Cily of Orono Project 400,000 Gallon HlevateJ Water Storage Tank Project No. I’UeNo. 13954 Qintractor Pill-Dcs Moines, Inc. ( iiangp: oum-RS No. Date I 2-20-92 Modify unit price on foundation piling Amount $0.00 ToLil Change Orders - Add $0.00 PAYMliNT SUMMARY No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Period Start 5-5-92 8-21-92 5-5-92 8- 21-92 9- 14-92 Payment $94,130.75 130,492.00 179,4(34.50 Rctainage $4,954.25 11.822.75 21.267.75 Completed $99,085.00 236.445.00 425.355.00 'I'otal Payment to Date Rctainage, Payment No. 'Fotal Value Completed $404.087 25 21.267.75 $425,355.00 Original Contract C'hangc Orders Revised Contract $595,150.00 0.00 $595,150.00 im4 HI I*RP-3 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Otto G BoneMrx) PE fictien W Hostile P£ • Jcvpf'^ C Andf^t^ Pt M.ir'/.r L Pt E Tu'^rf PE Gienn « Coo«i PL Tho^js E Nicvri PE G k''wr :-: P£ Sown M LOe^un C PA •>rHcy Conwit^nf Engineers & Architects A Uf*hyJ PE icrtth A Gcf.k‘'n P£ Pocei R Pr^ffpne P£ P'cnjrfl W Ecsre' PE D«r*.0 O lcs ‘ofrf P£ rtotea C AIA Jerry A Bot<nlon PE M.l k ^ PE T Rjutmjfvi P£ tfd K F.ekJ PE Thomas R Anderv5n A ; A Donad C Burgjndt. PE Trxy^as £ ^r^guj P£ limafi Waa.nez p £ W<hae3 P Rau P£ A./ ei M R.nc) A iC P Tnomai W ^er«yi P£ C U'Kh PE R Maano P£ Jerry D PefUVh P£ Kenneth P ArxJervsn P£ V j » R P£ Mj'k A Se-p P£ Gary W Monen P£ Carpet J EdgrfTcn PE Dar)l K K^rsche^'^ran P£ Ph i p J Catwe" P Va/h D 'A'a ws P£ es B Jensen P£ l Ph4»ip Grave* <;• PE KJTh I W.erne^ PE Gj', 0 Krurft/ PE E ?OfJJ FoiJer Pt Ke«tn R yapp PE Sha^n D Guita^v^n l Cec '*c C“'ve' Pf Cn.ar»ei A E'*ckion Leo M Pawe«Uy wanan M O wn James F Er>ge»harcft /J I October 19, 1992 O.•> ^ •? City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 "Oa % Attn:Mr. John Gerharclson Re:Stubbs Bay Sanitary Sewer Iniproyements File No. 13937 Dear John:]L^ W €\ I V V-/11 1 i • Enclosed please find three (3) copies of Request for Payment No. 3 for the abo\e referenced project. Tliis portion of the work has been satisfactorily completed and we recommend payment at this time. If you haye any questions, please contact me. Yours v’crv' truly. BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCTA1ES. INC, Harlan M. Olson I : llMO:pah Enclo.su re i ?I IJ9J7.COR 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55I13 • 612*636-4600 J J/J Oonestroo Rosene Owner C'ity of Orono, 133.5 Hrown Road, C'lystal Hay, MN 552.U Date October 13, 1992 Andertik A |u| AstfxlJtes I*'or Period Seplcmbcr 8, \o October 13,Rc(|uc.sl No. 3 lAytrtM** A A«tMUvU It Q)ntraetor Progressive ('onlractors, liie., 8730 Zachary Lane, Osseo, MN 55369 RiiOUl-ST I'OK I*AYMi:N r Slubbs Hay Sanitar)' Sewer Iinprovemenls bile N(.. 139.17 SUMMARY 1 Oiiginal Conlrael Amount 2 Change Order • Addition 3 Change Order - Deduction 4 Revised Contract Amount 5 Value Completed to Date 6 Material on Hand 7 Am«)tinl Darned 8 Less Retainage 5% 9 Sub-Total $ $9..390.00 $ 10 L.CS.S Amount Paid Previously 11 AMOUNT DUH 'HIIS RLOUEST FOR PAYMDN T NO. Recommended for Approval by: BONIuSTUOO, UOSI^NH, ANDFiRLIK & ASSOCIAn-S, INC. Approved by Contractor: I'ROGRliSSIVli CONTRACTORS, INC. Approved by Owner: ( IIY OF ORONO, MN Specified Contract Completion Date: Oernm u 15, 1992. Jui.Y 31. 1903 Dale: | Vr t7 HI H 1,480,331.95 $1,489,721.95 $7.30,993.61 $0.00 $730.993.61 $36,549.68 $694,443.93 $422,032.85 s 272,4 11.08 i No.Item Unit Cxmirui'l Omtfiiity Unit Pfitr Ou.inlily To DaU: Afiiount To Date 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 O') 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 HAS1‘. Min •• Stubhs Hay Nnrtliwcst. Slul'hs Hay Norllicast, :iiiJ Maysidc I'asl I’atl A • S.iiiiliirv Sewer 8" VVe, SDK 35. O’-S* deep iu pl.iec 8" 1-VC. SDK 35. S’-10- deep iu pUe 8- we. SDR 35. 10’.|2* deep iu pl.iee 8" I’VC. SDK 35. 12’-14* deep iu ph.ee 8" l'VC\ SDK 35. 14’-16’ deep iu ph.ee 8" I’VC\ SDK 26. 8’-10' deej) iu place 8" PVC. SDK 26. 10’-12’ deep in place s’’ PVC. SDK 26. 12’. 14’ deep in place s’’ 1*VC. SDK 26. I4’-I6 ’ deep lu ph.ee 8" I'VC. SDR 26. 16’-18’ deep in ph.ee 8” PVC. SDK 26. l8’-20‘ deep iu phicc 8" PVC. SDK 26. 20’-22’ deep in ph.ee 8" DIP. 8’-10’ deep lu place 8" DIP. 10’-12’ deep iu ph.ee S" DIP, 12*-14* deep in placc 10" PVC. SDK 35. 0’-8’ deep in ph.ee 10" PVC. SDK 35. 8’-10’ de p iu ph.ee 10" PVC. SDK 35. 10’-12’ deep iu place 10" PVC. SDK 35. 12’-14’ deep iu place 10" PVC. SDK 35. 14*-16’ deep in place 10" PVC. SDK 26. I2’-14’ deep iii ph.ee 10" PVC. SDK 26. I P-16’ deep in place 10" PVC, SDK 26, If>’-I8’ deep in place 10" PVC. SDK 26. l8’-20* deep in phiee 10" DIP. 14’-16’ deep in phiee Sid. Mil 8’dp.. 4’ dia . VI/K1M2H esig. .Mil deplli greater lli.iii 8’ deep 8" DIP. uulmdu drop h~ PV(^, SDK 21. loree main J.ick or auger 6" PVC, SDK 21 force niain 4* P\3', SDK 21. force tii.nn Aif release uiauliule Kock siah.li/aiion 139J7 R| !• I 1- U-' 1.1- 1.1- II-' IJ- IJ- I.F LI- i.r IJ- IJ- LI- LI- U- LI-' IJ' IJ- LI- LI- LF LI IJ- LF LI LA IF LI- LF IJ- IF I A IN KP-I 615 1.775 1.175 215 230 55 115 355 3(M) 310 315 115 120 30 35 415 130 105 340 135 245 440 405 40 30 36 140 25 9(XJ hO 1800 I 500 14 IM) 14.00 15.00 16.00 17.50 15.00 16.00 I7.IMI 18.50 20.00 23.00 27.00 2100 23.00 24.00 15..50 15.. 50 16.. 50 18.00 19.50 19.00 20.50 23.00 27.00 31.. 50 1J.50.'I0 90.00 250.00 110.'' 130.00 10 (N) 2,0ft)00 II.10 5(MI 1.695 1.050 186 230 40 KM) 332 28h 291 288 90 60 40 483 120 98 307 111 391 376 30 20 34 121.0 19.2 60 2.675 191.26 7.000.00 23.730.00 15.750.00 2.976.00 4.025.00 ()00.00 l.bOO.OO 5.644.00 5.291.00 5.820.00 6.624.00 2.4.30.00 1320.00 920.00 7.486.50 1.860.00 1.6 17.00 5326.00 2354..50 4.218.00 8.015 ..50 8.648.00 810.00 630.00 45.900.00 10.890.00 4.800.00 7.800.00 26.750.00 1122.99 Item 34 Comiccl 6” PVC inlo cxtsling manhole 35 8”x4'' P\X' service wye hraiich 36 4” PVC service |)ipe iu place 37 4" l*VC service riser pi|)e in place 38 Improved pipe Ulii. in 6" increment dc|Mli 39 Mechanical trench compaction 40 Detour per detail 41 Insulation 42 Sanitary sewer television inspcctiou 43 Access manhole (Addendum 2) Total Part A - Sanitary Sewer part H • Restoration 44 Bituminous surlacing removal 45 Common excavation 46 Cl 5 aggregate base (100% crushed) 47 CL 2, aggregate shouldering 48 Type 31 bituminous base course 49 Tyi>e 41 bitumimtus binder course 50 Ty|>e 41 bnamuious wearing course 51 AC-1 lotuminmis material for mix 52 Hiiuininous material for lack coat 53 Bituimnous material fur seal coat 54 l'A-3 seal coal aggregate (( 'I. A) in pi. 55 Bilummous material for patching 56 12" RCP. (Mass 3 in place 57 18" RC'I*. ('lass 3 in place 58 24" R( 'P. CLiss 3 in place 59 36" RCTP, Cl.tss 3 in place 60 12" ROMIared cud in place 61 18" Rt 'P Hared end in |)lace 62 24" RCP flared end w tr.isli guard in pi. 63 36* RC'P llarcd end wvtr.rsh guard in pi. 64 Mechanical trench compaction 65 Impr. pific fdn in 6" increment de|)th t>6 Keiiu>vr exisiijig (*MP culvert I Wt7 Ul !• Unit CoiilrucI Oiiuulily Unit 1 ‘iiu: Ouanlily Tu Dale Amount '16 Dale liA 1 400.00 II. \S5 60.IM)82 4.920.00 1.1-2.100 IL.50 1.840 21.160.00 u-100 11.50 78 897.00 LI-24.(X)0 1.40 11..500 16.I00.U0 1.1-I4..S75 1.00 11.781 11.781.00 lii 1 6.000.00 1 6.000.00 SY 300 20.00 LI-8.075 0.60 l-A 1 IJilMUM)1 1400.00 S285.716.49 SY 11.000 1.75 10,000 17400.00 C'Y 6.000 .3.70 5.200 I9T40.00 TN 7.800 8.50 8.001 68.008.50 IN 400 I2..50 502 6.275.00 TN 1.400 14.50 552.46 8.010.67 IN 450 15.00 .313.49 4.702.35 TN 1.000 16.00 23 368.00 TM 167 120.00 40.23 4.827.60 (5L 1.200 1.30 100 1.30.00 c,..1.400 3.00 IN 70 50.00 SY 1.000 22.1K) LI-150 I7..50 II-75 20.50 IJ-50 25.90 LI40 48.45 LA 10 36;i.00 L/\4 410.00 i-:a ■*1.005.00 l A 1.660.00 IJ 315 LOO 11-3(X)2.00 LI 315 3.(8):fi0 780.00 KP 2 Nu.lie III 67 i*illcr blanket in place 68 Riprap. CL III iu place 69 Tree removal 70 Sod wiili 4" topsoil 71 Seed w/topsoil. iiiulcli & fertili/cr 72 IIro:»ioa control fence 73 Wood fiber blanket 74 L'urnisli and plant I’Aergrecu tree (blue Spruce) 6* high 75 Furimh and plant shade tree (Sugar Maple) 4’ dianieter 76 Remove repl. wood or chain link fence 77 Remove ^V: transplant bushes 78 Remove transplant tree • Desiduous 79 Remove A transplant tree • Coniferous 80 Gcofextile fabric (Addendum 2) Total Fart H • Restoration Fart » I ift Station #1 > West l^ike St. hi Lilt Station No. 1 l otal Fart C - I ift Sta. #1 - W I.ake St. Fart I) ■ I ift Station #2 ■ lonka Avenue 82 I.jlt Station No. 2 It»tal Fart I) - l ift Sta. # 2 - Tonka Av Total Fart A • Sanitary Sewer Total PaM n • Restoration Total Fart C • I.S. #1 - West Lake St. Total Fart I) • LS. #2 • Tonka A\ciiuf loiAi. hasp: hid Al H RNA IT NO I ■ MM)PRW(3()n Fart A • Sanitary Sewer 83 8- PVC. SDR 35. 0’.8’ deep in place 84 8- PVC, SDR 35. 8’-10* deep lu place Unit C*.in tract Oiunlily Unit Fiicc SY 200 2.50 SY 200 45.00 l-zX 175 125.00 SY 14.000 2.00 Ac:4 800.00 I.F 4.500 2.00 SY 1.500 1.10 HA 6 350.00 i:a 6 350.00 IJ-600 10.00 HA 12 50.00 i:a 12 100.00 HA 12 100.00 SY 15.000 1.50 LS 1 60,400.00 1 50.350.00 LI* IJ- 625 405 13.00 13.00 Ouaiiliiy *l'u Uulc Afimuiil *lo Djle 77 9,625.00 8,705 515 320 J3.057J50- J 152.524.62 $0.00 $0.00 .:85.7I6 4Q 152.524.62 0.00 ___om. $438.24 Ml 6.695.00 4.160.00 1WI7 Kl I*KI* 3 Ilcin 85 S’* PVC, Sl)R 35. 10‘.12 ’ deep in place 86 8** PVC. SDR 35. I2 ’-14’ deep in pi ice 87 8 ” PVC. SDR 35. 14’-16* deep in place 88 S" PVC. SDR 26. Q’-H* deep in place 8 ” PV( \ SDR 26. 8 ’. 10* deep in place 90 8" PVC. SDR 26. I0’.12* deep in place 91 8 ” PVC. SDR 26. 12 ’-14’ deep in place 92 H* PVC. SDR 26. 14’.|6‘ deep in place 93 8- PVC. SDR 26. 16’. 18* deep in place 94 8 ” PVC. SDR 26. l8 ’-20* deep in place 95 8 ” PVC. SDR 26, 20 ’.22 ’ deep in place 96 8 “ DIP, 8*-10 ’ deep in place 97 S’* DIP. to*-12 ’deep in place 98 Sid MU 8* dp.. 4* dia.. w/RI642H c^lg. 99 Manhole depth greater than 8* deep 100 4" PVC. SDR 21. force main 101 8 ” X 4" PVC service w)*e branch 102 4” PVC service pipe in place 103 4" PVC service rcier pipe in place 104 Mechanical trench coinpaclion 105 Improved pi|>e fJn. in 6" increment depth 106 Rock stabili/alion 107 Sanitary sewer television inspection rcjial !*art A • Sanitary Sewer Part H - Restoration 108 Hiluminous removal 1(» Common cxc ivation 110 ('lass 5 .iggrc^atc l>.isc (lOOCJ crushed) 111 ^Vl^r 31 bituniuious base course 112 l)pc 41 uitummous binder course 113 1ypc 41 bituminous wearing c'oursc 114 AC*l biluiiiiiious uialcrial (or mix 115 Hituiiinious material lor tack 11 6 1'rce removal 117 Biiuiiiiiinus iii.iterial for patcliiug Oinlracl Unit Ou.itilily AfTKHint Unit Quaiiliiy 1*1 ill;'lb O..U:I'ti Date LI-170 14.00 160 2.240.00 1.1-15.50 10 155.00 II'20 17.00 to 170.00 LI-25 14.00 LI-50 14.00 IJ-30 14.00 U-25 15.00 LI-165 16.50 LI-215 18.00 \A-30 22.00 II-’50 26.00 LI-20 20.00 II-20 20,00 20 400.00 l-A 10 1 ..350,00 6 8,100.00 1.1-2«90.00 12 1.030.00 LI70 15.00 LIA 13 60.(H)6 360.00 LI-460 15.00 1.30 1.950.(10 Ll-40 1.5.00 IJ-2.415 LOO 1.035 1.035.00 LI*4.U(X>1.50 1.015 1A 22.50 IN 100 11.00 LI-1 ,.S8H 0.6.5 $27.867..50 SY 1.100 2.00 9'0 1 .W) 00 CY 500 5.70 IN 700 9.00 TN 2lMl |9.(M) IN to 23.(JO IN 150 20.00 IN 120.00 C.L 250 l.'O i:^\50 115.00 50 6.250.00 SY '(XI 2100 I1 I.W, 7 HI »•UP 4 (4>iiLrai'4 Unit Quantity AmountNo. item Unit Ouajiliiy 1‘rice To Dale to Date 118 Sod with 4” lopsoil SY 3^00 2.00 119 Seed w/lo|isoil. mulch it fertili/cr AC l.U 800.00 120 Geotextile fabric (Addendum 2)SY LIOO 1.50 Total Part U - Rcstoratioa $8,150.00 Part C • Lift Station #.l 121 Lift Station No. 3 LS 1 40.450.00 25%___UUllilL Total I'atl C • Lift Sla, #3 $10,112.50 Total Part A • Sanitary Sewer 27.867.50 Total Part R • Restoration 8.(50.00 lotal Part C • Uft Sla. 3 - Bederwood 10,117 SO toi al ALn:i<NA rii no. i ■ ui-Dr.RwooD $46,130.00 ALFiniNA H* NO. 2 ■ MAYSIDIt NOR1 H Part A - SanitafN ’ Sewer 122 8** PV'(J, SDK 35, 0’-8* deep in placo IJ*140 13.00 123 8" PVC, SDR 35, 8’-10* deep in place U'225 13.00 124 8- PVC. SDR 35. 10*. 12* deep in place LF 8.5 14.00 125 8** PVC. SDR 35. I2*-I4’ deep in place LI-215 I5..50 126 Std Mil 8* dp.. 4* ilia.. W/RI642B cstg.I-y\3 U.50.00 127 Manbole depth greater than 8* deep U'6 00.00 128 8** DIP. outside drop LF 625 250.00 129 8" X 4" PVC service wye braiu l-A h 60.00 130 4" PVC service pi|ic in place U-105 15.00 131 4** PVC service nscr pipe in place U-10 L5.00 132 Improved pn>e fdii. iii 6" luerement depth U*500 2.00 133 Mechanical trench compactRiu IJ-810 1.00 134 Sanitary sc^xt tclcvisiou laspectmo (Addendum 2)IJ-675 0.65 'lotal Part A ■ Sanitary Sewer saou part B - Restoration 135 Tree removal lv\50 115.00 136 Sod vvrith 4" to|i>otl SY 2.(881 218) U9J7 uir KI'-5 No.Item Unit CAintxael Oiuntfty Unit Quantity To Dale AtnounI lu Dale 137 Seed with (npsoil, mulch & fertili/er Tolal Pari U - Ke:ktoratiou 0.5 800.00 SC.OO Total Part A - Sanitary Sewer rolal l*art H • Restoration TOIM. AL'riiRNAlli NO. 2 - HAYSIDli NORTH 0.00 $0.00 Ai;n:RNAi p: no. 3 ♦ cvoNirr pi ac p: Part A ■ Sanitary Sewer 138 8- PVC, SDR 35. O’ S* deep in place 139 r PVC SDR 35. H’-IO* deep in place 140 8" PVC SDR 35. lO'-IT deep in place 141 8- PVC SDR 35. I2*.|4* deep in place 142 8- PVC SDR 35. 14’.16- deep in place 143 8- PVC SDR 26. 0’ 8’ deep in pl.ice 144 8- PVC SDR 26. S’-IO* deep in jilace 145 8- PVC SDR 26. I0’-I2 ’ deep in place 146 8" PVC SDR 26. IT IV deep iii place 147 8** PVC. SDR 26. 14*-16’ deep in place 148 8- PVC SDR 26. 16’.18’ deep iu place 149 8” PVC SDR 26. I8’.20* deep in place 150 8- PVC SDR 26. 20’ 22 ’ deep in place 151 8- PVC SDR 26. 22 ’-24’ deep m place 152 8‘ PVC. SDR 26. 24’-26 ’ deep lu place 153 8* PVC. SDR 26, 26*-28* deep in place 154 8* PVC. SDR 26. 28’-30’ deep in place 155 SltL Mil 8* dp.. 4* dia.. w/R16*12H cstg. 15%"i Manhole depth greater than 8’ deep 157 8" DIP. outside drc»p 158 8** X 4" PVC service wve brauch 15^> 4” PVC scA'ice pipe tu place 160 4" PV'C sen ICC riser |>i|>c in |>lace 161 Improved pifn: Idii. 6'* im ictm ut iipili 162 Mechanical trench compaction 163 Saiiitarv' sewer lelcvtsion inspci ii mi I'otal Part A • Saiiitarv Sewei I-F 400 12.00 300 3.600.00 U-12.00 100 1.200.00 U-335 13.00 215 2.795.00 U-235 14.00 85 1.190.00 U-50 I5..50 30 465.00 LF 25 13.00 10 130.00 IF 65 1.3.00 40 520.00 U-75 14.00 60 840.00 U*2.S0 15.00 100 U500.00 LF 735 16..50 615 I0.147..50 U-885 18.00 800 14.400.00 LF'440 20.00 430 8,600.00 IF 120 23.00 110 22)30.00 LI*135 26.(X)l£0 3.120.00 LF 145 29.00 115 3,625.00 LF 175 32.00 L50 4.800.00 LF 170 38.00 L50 5.700.00 liA 18 L350.00 14 IS.'XiO.OO LF 138 90.00 100 9.000.00 LF 5.2 250.00 4.5 1.115.00 FA 34 60.00 22 1J20.00 LI-1.050 12.00 500 h.OOO.OO LF 150 12.00 !.!•7„S(H)1.75 3.440 6.020.UtJ II-5.545 1.00 3.940 3.940.fX) LI-4.405 0.65 $111,467.50 imiurv UP 6 Item Part n » Rcs(t)nitioii Unit Cxiiitract Quaulily Unit Trice Quaiilily *To Djte I'otal l\'irt H * Uc!»torattoii Total Part A • Sauitary Sewer Total Part H • Restoration rO TAL Ai:n-RNA IT: NO 1 - ('YONIT PI API I39t7 UI P RP-7 Aftioiinl 'lb 164 Remove existing bituminous SY 10.800 1.80 9 780 17.604.00 165 Common excavation CY 4.500 4.40 1.300 5.720.00 166 Class 5 aggregate b;ise (100% crusbed)IN 6.000 8.50 1.339 11.381..50 167 Type 31 bituminous b;ese course TN 1.500 14.50 168 Type 41 bituminous wearing course TN 1.200 15.50 169 AC-1 biluniiuous lualeriul for mix TN ir>o 120.00 170 Bituminous material for lack coat CiL 750 I..50 171 Bituiiiiiiuus malerial for patching SY 300 22.00 172 12” RCP, Class 5 in place I.F 3(K)17.50 173 15" RCP, Class 4 in place LF 30 19.00 174 18” RCP, Class 4 in place LF 75 21.00 175 33” RCP, Class 3 in place U-100 33.00 70 2 J 10.00 176 48” RCP, Class 3 in place U-80 81.00 80 6.480.00 177 12" RCP flared end in place FA 12 365.00 178 15” RCP Bared end in place EA ■>390.00 179 18” RCP Bared end in place liA 4 410.00 180 33” RCP Bared end w/tncsli guard in pi.l-A 2 2.500.00 2 5.000.00 181 48” RCP Bared end w/trasb guard in pi.liA 2,665.00 2 5J30.00 182 Mechanical trench compaction LF 495 LOO 150 150.00 183 Impr. pi(>c fdn. in 6” increment depth LF 400 2.00 L50 300.00 184 Remove existing CMP culvert LF 495 3.00 100 300.00 185 Filter blanket in place SY 25 2.50 186 Riprap in place CY 50 50.00 187 Tree removal EA 15 115.00 2 150.00 188 Sod with 4” topsoil SY 7.500 2.00 189 Seed with tofisoil, mulch & fertili/er AC 2.0 800.00 190 Geotextile fabric (Addendum 2)SY 5.500 1.50 2J00 _JUS1L0Q_ $58J!75.50 III.4o7.50 SKP7 S sn S 169.743.00 Item Unit (^uuLracI Quantity Unit |»ricc Quantity Ti> Dale Amount To Date AnTiRNA II: NO. 5 - OXFORD ROAD Part A • Sanitary Sewer 191 8" PVC, SDR 35. lO’-lZ* deep in place 192 8‘ PVC. SDR 35. ir-14* deep in place 193 8" PVC. SCR 35. 14*-I6* deep in place 194 8- PVC. SIMI 35. 16’.18- deep in place 195 SlA Mil 8* dp.. 4* dia.. W/R1642U cstg. 196 Mil depth greater than 8* deep 197 H’*x4** PVC service wye branch 198 4" PVC service pipe in place 199 4 ” PVC service riser pi|>e in place 200 Improved pi|>c fdu. in 6" increment deptli 201 Mechanical trench compaction 202 Sanitary sewer television inspection Total Part A - Sanitary Sewer Part H - Restoration 20'^ j*iniinous surfacing removal 204 % *mion excavation 205 ^ a aggregate base (100% crushed) 206 Type 31 bituminous base course 207 Ty|K“ 41 bituminous wearing course 208 AC*I bituminous material for mu 209 Hiluminous material for tack coat 210 Hituminous material for patching 211 Tree removal 212 Sod with 4** to|>soil 213 Seed w/tO|)soil, mulch & fertilizer 214 lirosion control fence 215 (leotexlile fabric (Addendum 2) 'Folal Part li • Restoration Total Part A • Sanitary Sewer I'otal Part H - Restor.ition rO I AL AUliRNAHi NO. 5 - OXI ORD ROAD D9J7 HI P RP S u-675 13.00 715 9.295.00 LI-4U0 14.50 413 5.988.50 U'150 17.00 140 2380.00 LF :oo 20.00 179 3380.00 EA 5 1350.00 5 6,750.00 U-28 90.00 24 2,160.00 FA 12 60.00 13 780.00 l.l-500 12.00 3W 4,680.00 IJ'40 12.00 25 300.00 2.000 2.00 1.447 2.894.00 LF 1.025 1.00 1.837 1.837,00 LI-1.415 0.65 $40,644.50 • SY 4.100 2.00 3.960 7,920.00 CY l.6(XJ 4.60 1.400 6,440.00 IN 2300 8.50 2.150 18.275.00 IN 400 16.00 IN 300 18.00 IN 42 120.00 r.L 235 1.50 SY 150 2100 FA 3 115.00 SY 4.100 2.00 AC 13 800.00 IF 200 2.00 SY 2.5(K I..50 2.400 3 600 00 S36.235.0a 40.W4.50 $76,879.50 No.Item Unit Contracl Ouantiiy Unit l•^icc Quantity To OaU Anumnl *lu Dak: C'hnntie Order No. 1 216 Modify Lift Statiou No. 3 Total Change Order No. 1 9.390.00 SO.OO 'l olal Ba^c Bid I'otal Alternate No. 1 • Bederwood Total Alternate No. 2 - Baysidc North Total Alternate No. 3 • Cygnet Place Total Alternate No. 5 - Oxford Road 3 otal Change Order No. I TO'PAL WORK COMPLirniD 3 0 DA 11: 438.241.11 46.130.00 0.00 169.743.00 76.879.50 _____ILQUl S730.993.61 l KH'RP-9 PKOJi-cr i»aymi :nt staius Owner City of Orono Project Stubbs Uay Sanitary Sewer Project No. FUe No. 13937 Cbntractor I’rogrcssivc Contractors, Inc. CIIANGF. ORDHRS No. Date 1 7-8-92 Modify Lift Station #3 Total Change Orders - Add PAYMENT SUMMARY 4 5 6 7 K 9 lU Total Payment to D.ale Uelainage, Payment No, Total A.tiounl Earned $691,443.93 36.549.68 $7.30.993.61 Original Contract Change Orders Uevi.sed ('ontracl lJ937Rir UP-10 Amount $9,390.00 $9390.00 No.Period l*ayment Retainagc Completed 1 Start 8-7-92 $116,255.77 $6,118.73 $96,918.04 2 8-7-92 9-8-92 305,777.08 22,212.26 444,245 11 3 9-8-92 10-13-92 272,411.08 36,549.68 730,993.61 1,480331.95 9390.00 1,489,721.95 n To: From: Date: Subject: Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator October 1, 1992 % ^s:% of Briar Street At the September 28 Council meeting, a resident of Briar Street expressed a concern about Briar Street not being maintained by the City as a public roadway. The Council directed staff to investigate his concern. The issue of responsibility for maintenance relates to the City's policy concerning public vs. private roads. In general, the City has not taken on responsibility for new roadways developed since the 1970's. The current City policy provides that new development is served by private roads that are maintained by a Homeowners Association. One reason for this is that it would be very inefficient for the Public Works staff to drive to the widely scattered private roads to do maintenance. In past discussions concerning public vs. private responsibility for road maintenance, it has been pointed out that the maintenance issue is larger than simply snow plowing. Maintenance includes repairing potholes, handling storm drainage, patching and overlaying worn pavement and reco^nstructing roadways. This wide range of maintenance responsibilities could have a significant financial impact. A key condition of the City considering taking over the maintenance of a private road is that the roadway be constiucted to City standards. This enables the City to avoid "inheriting'* responsiblity for major repair or reconstruction of roadways that were originally installed as driveways to serve a specific subdivision. If a roadway does not currently meet City standards, it must be upgraded. Briar street is one of those streets that was installed as a gravel driveway to serve a small number of homes and not meet City standards. In order for the City to consider taking on responsibility for the maintenance of the street. Briar Street would have to be upgraded to City standards. The costs o ® upgrade would be borne by the property owners adjacent to the road. There are a number of streets similar to Briar Street that are maintained by the City and a number that are not maintained by the City. The decisions related to the maintenance of those streets were made in the 1960's and 1970's. The decisions were not consistently related to whether the roads were platted or to whether the City had easements over them. However, the City has been consistent in recent years in not adding streets similar to Briar Street to its maintenance responsibilities. 101992.2 •PQ. Mayor Peterson and City Council FROM: DATE: Ron Moorse, City Administrator October 19» 1992 / ^45 > % SUBJECT: city Hall and Public Works Buildings Application and Certificate of Payment No. 8 Attachment: Application and Certificate of Kraus-Anderson Construction Co. Steenberg-Watrud Const. Co Gephart Electric Steininger Const. Co. Gresser Concrete/Masonry Allied Mechanical Mannstedt Steel Northside Construction National Automatic Sprinkler Molin Concrete Products Vohnoutka Roofing LaForce Hardware Mulcahy, Inc. Technical Surfacing Payment No. 8 $16,703.22 78,987.60 13,492.80 19,813.50 10,197.90 34,757.29 8,820.00 71.564.00 16.182.00 6,180.00 62,307.00 4,246.20 4.050.00 7.965.00 We have received from project Construction Manager John Davies approved application for payment of work at the city hall and public works locations as follows: Kraus-Anderson Construction Co. - For construction management services for September, $7,443.00 for site supervision and reimburseable expenses through September 19, $9,260.22 Steenberg-Watrud Construction Co. - For concrete floors, block and exterior veneer at city hall/police building and public works building, $78,987.60 Gephart Electric Company, Inc. - For electrical public works and city hall/police buildings, $13,492.ow Steininger Construction Co. - For site earthwork, grading, and fabric, $19,813.50 Gresser Concrete/Masonry - ’=*or concrete slab at public works building, $10,197.90 Allied Mechanical Systems - For public works location plumbing, $34,757.29 Mannstedt Steel - For miscellaneous steel for public works, police and city hall buildings, $8,820.00 Northside Construction - For carpentry at police and city hall buildings, $71,564.00 National Automatic Sprinkler - For fire protection systems at the public works, police and city hall, $16,182.00 Molin Concrete Products - For structural precast concrete at the city hall/police building, $6,180.00 - Vohnoutka Roofing - ^or roofing and sheet metal at city hall/police, and public works buildings, $62,307.00 LaForce Hardware - For metal door frames at city hall/police, and public works buildings, $4,246.20 Mulcahy Inc. - For drywall and exterior insulation and finish system work at the public works building, $4,050.00 Technical Surfacing, Inc. - For concrete sealing at the public works building, $7,965.00 The attachments are presented for your approval. Requested Action: Council approval of Architect's Application and Certificate for Payment No. 8 as presented. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , to approve City Hall and Public Works Buil’Hlngs Architect^ Application and Certificate for Payment No. 8 in the amount of $355,266.51, as presented. Motion, Ayes __, Nays __. [.r SI APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT Pago 1 of 1 PagesTO (OWNER): City of Orono1335 Brown Road South Crystal Bay, MN 55323 PROJECT: Orono City Hall/Policoand Public Works Building CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: Kraus-Anderson Construction 525 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55404 ARCHITECT: Boarman Kroos Pfisler 222 North Second Street Minneapolis, MN 55401 APPLICATION NO: Eight PERIOD FROM: September 1,1992 PERIOD TO: September 30,1992 ARCHITECTS PROJECT NO; 1124.04 CONTRACT DATE: November 12, 1991 SECTION CONTRACTOR/SUPPUER CURRENT PAYMENT DUE 100 Kraus-Anderson $9,260.22 • 02200 Steininger $19,813.50- 03300 Grosser $10,197.90 • 03410 Molin Concrete/Masonry $6,180.00 - 04220 Steenberq-Watrud $78,987.60 • 05100 Mannstedt $8,820.00 • 06100 Northside Construction $71,564.00 • 07610 Vohnoutka $62,307.00 • 08110 LaForce Hardware $4,246.20 • 09260 Mulcahy, Inc.$4,050.00 • 09800 Technical Surfacing $7,965.00 • 15000 Allied Mechanical $34,757.29 ' 15500 National Automatic Sprinkler $16,182.00 • 16000 Gephart Electric $13,492.80 • CM Fee Kraus-Anderson $7,443.00 . TOT XL:$355,266.51 ARCHITECTS CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on-site observations and the data comprising the above situation, the Architect certifies to the Owner that to the best of the Architect’s knowledge. Information and belief the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documeriis. and the Contractors are entitled to payment of the AMOUNT INDICATED. ARCHTECT iJrtds By: nv'UAJLT Dale: V WM ■ V I ^4^ ORONO cmr hau . and public works duildwgs OnONO.MN PAGE: 1 OF 4 APPUCATK)NNUMOEn:0CONTRACTOR S PROJECT NO.: 4059mANO.OESCWPTIONOFWORK WORK COMPLETED STOREDMATERIALS TOTAL COMPLETED STORED TO DATE %BALANCE TO fnNBH RETAINAGESCHEDULEDVALUEPREVIOUSAPPLICATIONSTHISAPPLICATION 100 Kraus-Anderson Construction $86,000.00 $49,023.07 $7,109.56 $56,132.63 64%$31,867.37 - Tamporary Office $2,950.00 $0.(0 0%$2,950.00 • Temporary Phone $1,500.00 $1,464.38 $135.48 $1,59'.86 107%($99 86) • Temporary Toilet $1,500.00 $424.64 ;«24.64 28%$1,075.36 • Equipment Rental $10,000.00 $5,442 41 $842.75 $6,265.16 63%$3,714.64 • Gas and Oil (Operation of Equipment)$1,000.00 $0.00 0%$1,000.00 • Travel and Expenses $500.00 $126.39 $126.39 25%$373 61 - Trucking $4,000 00 $1,206.97 $1,206.97 30V $2,793.03 • Refuse Dumpsters $9,600.00 $1,505.00 $215 00 $1,720.00 18%$7,880.00 • Licensed Surveying (Coffin A Gronberg)$8,500 00 $1,791.00 $1,791.00 21%$6,709.00 ■ Misc. Barriers and Guard Raiis____________$2,000.00 $0.00 0%$2,000.00 • Continuous Clean-up $9,855.00 $0.00 0%$9,855 00 • Final Cleaning $11,000.00 $0.00 0%$11,000 00 • Temporary Construction Fences and Gates $1,650 00 $2,068 27 $2,068 27 125%($418 27) - Temporary Electric $1,650 00 $5,160 06 $63.93 $5,243 99 318%($3,593.99) • Temporary Enclosures $2,000 00 $0.00 0%$2,000.00 - Temporary Fire Protection $500.00 $0.00 0%$500.00 • Project Sign $450 00 $0 00 0%$450.00 • Testing(Conc.,Earthwork and Special la p.)$8,000.00 $35,799.70 $893 50 $36,693.20 459%($28,693.20) • Snow Removal $750 00 $0.00 0%$750 00 • ContirHierKy $1,600.00 $0 00 0%$1,60U 00 • Bultdinq Permit $16,938 00 $758 93 $758.93 4V $16,179 07 2200 Steininger $254,000 00 $218,500 00 $13,000 00 $231,500 00 91%. $22,500 00 $23,150 00 ORONO CriY HAU AND PUBLIC WORKS BUtLONGS OnONO.MN PAGE: 2 OF 4 APPUCATX>N NUMBER: 8CONTRACTORS PROJECT NO.: 405®HB4NO.DESCmPnON OF WORK WORK COMPLETED STORH)MATERIALS TOTAL COMPLETH) STORED TO DATE %BALANCE TO FWBH RETAf4AGE9CHE£XJLH)VALUE PREVIOUSAPPLICATIONS THISAPPLICATIONC O. 1 • Utility Work. Sitowork Revisions $79,623.00 $70,608 00 $9,015.00 $79,623.00100%$0.00 $3,981.15 2510 Mkheest Asphalt $4t,100 00 $0.00 0%$41,100 00 $0 00 2950Mldl ind Nursery $35,884.00 $000 0%$35,604.00 $0.00 3300 Oretser • Public Works $81,578 00 $71,578 00 $10,000.00 $81,578.00100%$0.00 $8,157.80 3410 Moln Concrete $14,196 00 $14,196 00 $14,196.00 100%$0.00 $1,419 60 CC. 1 $6,867 00 $6,867 00 $6,867 00 100%$0 00 $686 70 4220 Oresser • Public Works $100,249 00 $100,249 00 $100,249 00 100%$0.00 $10,024 90 CO. 1 $5,596 CC $5,596.00 $5,596.00 100%$0 00 $559 60 CO. 2 $3,461.00 $1,331 00 $1,331.00 38%$2,130.00 $133.10 4220 Stoenberq-Watrud • City Hall A Public Works $342,500.00 $149.00000 $84,764 00 $3,000.00 $236,764 00 69%$105,736.00 $23.67640 CO 1 ($13,870 15)$0.00 0%($13,870 15)$0.00 5100 Mannsledt Steel $50,760 00 $40,960 00 $9,800.00 $50,760.00100%$0.00 $0.00 1 5110 Amerect, IrK.$15,145 00 $12,045 00 $12,045 00 80»1 $3. *00 00 10.00 1^ « II 6100 Northtide Construction '.eo 00 $82,078 00 $64,648.00 $14,868 00 $161,594.00 58%>118.386 00 $16,159.40 OnONO CfTV HALL AND PUBUC WORKS BUILDNGS CRONO.M n PAGE: 3 OF 4 APPUCATION N'JMBER: 8CONTRACTORS PROJECT NO : 4088 HBA NO. DESCRIPTION OF WORK SCHEDULED VALUE WORK COMPLETED TOTAL %BALANCETO Fl^ PETNtWSEPREVIOUS APPUCAT10NS THIS APPUCATION STORH) MATERIALS COMPLETED STORED TO DATE 6200Goebol Fixture $ V621.00 $0 00 0%$43,621 00 $0 00 7120 Kremer and Davis $2,925 00 $1,685 00 $1,685.00 58%$1,240 00 $188.50 C O. 1 • Add City Odices $1,490.00 $1,490 00 $1,490 00 100%$0 00 $149.00 7240 Mtlcahy $47,500.00 S 10 0%$47,500.00 $0 00 7610 VohnouOia Roofing *’56.288 00 $15,629.00 $53,400.00 $69,229 00 44%$87,059 00 $6,922.90 7800 Jansco Caulking $3,950.00 $0.00 0%$3,950 00 $0.00r 8110 laForce Hard^rare $35,463 00 $4,710 00 $4,718.00 13%$30,747 00 1471.80 8360 Twin City Garage Door $21,945.00 $0 00 0%$21,945 00 $0.00 0410 Moffer*s Glass $78,745.00 $0 00 0%$78,745 00 $0 00 9260 Mulcahy $117,500.00 $4.500 00 $4,500.00 4%$113,000 00 $450 00 9500 Twin City Acoustics $16,310.00 $0 00 0%$16,310 00 $0 00 9860 St. Paul Unoleum $38,553 00 $0 00 0%$38,553 00 $0 00 9800 Technical Surfacing $8,850 00 $8,850 00 $6.850 00 100%$0 00 $885 00 onoNo cmr h /mj. and pubuc works buildngs OnONO.MN PAGE: 4 OF 4 APPUCATION NIM3ER: 8CONTFVVCTOFTS PROJECT NO.: 4059 ITBM NO. DESCWFTIONOFWORK WORK COMPLETED STDRH) MATERIALS TOTAL COMPLETED STORED TO DATE %BALANCE TO RN6H RETAMAGESCHEDULED VALUE PREVIOUS APPUCATIONS THIS APPUCATION 9900 Swanson arxJ Youngdaki $24,894 00 $0.00 0%$24,894 00 $0.00 10400 IsRoy Sign $2,538 00 $0 00 0%$2.538 00 $0.00 10500 Mod#m Bin $7,841 00 $0.00 0%$7,841 00 $0.00 13120 Met'Con Constniction • Materials $156,200 00 $156,200 00 $156,200 00 100%$0 00 $0.00 13120 Mel'Con Construction $54,500 00 $34,012.00 $34,012 00 62%$20,488 00 $3,401.20 1SOOO Allied Mechanical $390,000 00 $91,910 00 $6,619 29 $32,000 00 $130,529 29 33%$259,470 71 $13,052.93 CO. 1 ($8,086.71)($8,086.71) 1S500 National Automatic SprinMer $46,590.00 $12,210 00 $17,140 00 $29,350.00 63%$17,240 00 $2,935.00 CO. 1 $6,580.00 $840 00 $840 00 13%$5,740.00 $84.00 16000 Gephart Etecbic $279,400 00 $72,267.00 $14,992.00 $87,259.00 31%$192,141 00 $8,725.90 Kraus Anderson CM $89,430 00 $67,101 00 $7,443 00 $74,544 00 83%$14,886 00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL OR TOTAL $3,104,040 14 $1,294,430 82 $293,574 80 $103,268 00 $1,699,360 33 55%$1,412,766 52 $125,194 88 m I KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CONTRACTORS CQN'STRUCTiC N \V-\NACERS Invoice #P28638 September 30 , 1992 City of Orono P.O. Box 66, 1335 Brown Road S. Crystal Bay, MN 55423 Attn: Mr. Tom Kuehn Finance Director Re: Orono City Hall K/A Project #4059 Request For Payment This request for payment is for on-site supervision and reimbursable expenses through September 19. 1992, as per construction manager contract dated November 12, 1991. Proiect Superintendent Doug Revard 152 hrs. @ $37.53/hr. Safety Tom Nelson Messenger Service Uaz Rodriquez Laborer Ralph Jendro III 6 hrs. @ $45.00/hr. 10 hrs. (a) $ 18.00/hr. 4 hrs. S32.58/hr. Reimbursable Expenses Copying Postage Braun Intertec K/A Equipment Rental MCI NSP U.S. West Veit Container Corp. AmOv..'i Due This Invoice Miniiejpulis OivUiuii 3J5 South 8th Street. Mmnfipolis. M'* 53404 Phorw (612) jJ2-7281 FA.X (6121 332-87 fm .tl Oooonumiv Emolovef $5,704.56 270.00 180.00 130.33 761.45 63.22 893.50 842.75 8.14 63.93 127.34 HIM $9,260.22 w I KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CONTRACTORS & CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS Invoice i^P2S639 September 30, 1992 City of Orono P.O. Box 66, 1335 Brown Road S Crystal Bay, MN 55423 Attn: Mr. Tom Kuehn Finance Director Re: Orono City Hall K/A Project #4059 Request For Paymen t This request for payment is for construction management services of Orono City Hall, as per the contract for the month of September 1992. Amount Due; $7,443.00 Minneapolis Division 52S South 8th Street, Minneapolis, MN 5540-t Phone (612)332-/281 FAX 0)2) 3a. 8739 Equal OpporTunifv Errplover tf J APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT aia documcnt C702 (insiructioni on reverse side) mcr oni or 4 paus10 (OWNCK):City of Orono1335 Brown Road South Crystal Bay, MN 55323 TKOM (CONTRACTOK); Steinlnger Construction Co. Inc. PROItCf:Orono City Ilall/Police and Public Works Buildings APPLICATION NO: GPCRIOD TO:9-30-92 VIA (ARCMITCCT): Barman Kroos Pfister A Assoc. ARCHIUCT'S PROirCT NO: Distribution to:U OWNER□ ARCHITECT (3 CONTRACTOR □ n 222 North Second Street CONTRACT EOR:Earthwork & Site Utilities Minneapolis, MN 55401 CONTRACT DATE; November 22 , 1 992 CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Application is made lor Payment, as shown below, it» connection with the Contract. Continuation Sheet, AIA Document G703, is attached. . V. > • CIIANGL ORDER SUMMARY Chnn}*o Orders opproved in previous monihs by Owner TOTAL kill. App^m<*<^ |Hi|ryonth Kluihber s(-:p I . *.» * * ’ Dale Approver' ^ 1 , .. • • •;■ rv.r.nyjny totals Net chanee by Clran^e Orders ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS t. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM......................................... S25l4 « OQQ .00- 2. Net change by Change Orders ..................... ........$ 79 ,623.00 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 + 2) ...............$3J j , 6 2 3 ._0_0 A. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE.....................J ^ 1 23.0^ (Column C on C703) 5. RETAINACE: »n. ^ ^ % o( Completed Work (Column D 4- E on C70T) b.___% of Stored Material ^ 31 ,112.30 (Column 1 on C70T) Total Rctainage (Line 5a 5b or Total in Column I of C703)^ 31,112.30 The under^i{»ned Contractor certifies that to the best of ilie Contractor's knowledf»e, ifdormation and lielief the Work covered by this Application for Payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract Documents. lh..t all amounts have been paid by the Contractor lor Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received from the Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now due. CONTRACIOR: 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE..................................<200.010.70 (Line A less Line 5 Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT (Line (* from prior Cerlilicale)...............:’!? f J.?.? r._——^ 0. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE...............................................S 19.813.50 K «). BALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINACE.......................S -r>3_.61 2^39 . (Line 3 less Line f») __________ Date: .'7-:xz- 1? Slate of: Subscribeefand swdrn to before Notary f^Jblic•y^^^y V County of ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In accordance with the C'onlrai I Documents, based on on-sile observations aiul the (tala comprising; the above applic •itjon, the Archilc ’cl c eitifii's to the Owner that to the best of llu* Arc hilec t's krniwied>;e. information and beliH the Work has progressed as indicated, the quality of the Work is in ac cordance with the Contract IXiciiments. and the Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNt Cf Rill IfD. ANNA M. CDONNEIL NOTARr PUBLIC • MNNESOTA bARUIALiOUkf / (Attnch cxplanjtiim tf .vtunint certified differs frorfHn'd'^tTfffunt'appUed. fonK^x r AKCHlirCT: By:Dale: this Ccriilicale is not negotiable. The AMOUNT ClRfiriED is payable only to the Contrarlor named herein. Issuance, payment ami acr eplanreol p.iymenl are wilhoul prejudice to any rights of ihe Owner ru Crrnlraclor under this Contract. A AIA DOCUAtlNT CTVl • AmiCAIION AN|) CTRIIMCAII lOR PAYMINI • MAY e»l IDIIION • AIA* • «• I'MU ItH AAMHKAN INS 11 mu OI AIU.TMm.TS. I7IS NIW YORK AV1NUI. N W. WASIIINC.IOM. D.C. Ti***-C7l»t9U TO (OWNER):City of Orono 1335 Brown Road South Crystal Day, MH 55323 FROM (CONTRACTOR): Q,eess(3t CONTKACT FOR: /jjTvfe CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT VIA (ARCHITECT): Boarman Kroos Pfister and Assoc. PROIECT NO: 1124.04 222 North Second Street Minneapolis, MN 55401 Distribulion lo:□ OWNER□ architect□ CONTRACTOR□□ CHANCE ORDER SUMMARY Change Orders apjirovcd in previous months by Owner TOTAL ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS Approved this Month Number Dale Approved • TOTALS 1 Net chance by Change Orders CONTRACT DATE: Application is made for Payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. Continuation Sheet, AIA Document G703, is attached. 1. OBICINAl CONtRACI SUM.......................................... $ 2. Net change by Change Orders......................................S nfeBAM 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 £ 2).........................S nOttRM 4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE.....................S —1 flS ,754...Qfl------------ (Column C on C703) 5. RETAINACE; a. 10 % of Completed Work $ ,18 <675.^0-------- (Column D +• E on C703) b. _% of Stored Material $------------------------------ inlormalion and belie! the Work covered by this Application for Payment has been completed in accordance with Ihe ConiracI Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor lor Work lor which previous Certificates lor Payment were issued and payments received from the Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now due. (Column F on C703) Total Retainage (Line 5a + 5b or , ^ Total in Column I of C703)......................................S —cq'ona^n 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINACE..................................S ° (Line 4 less Line 5 Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT (Line 6 from prior Certificate)...............S 8. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE................................................ 5 CONTRACTOR:•I* **\\ n-iL* ’I GEORGE G, POLUSNY », ,,.1,1 fiOTAnV ruOLlC • MINNESOTA I.Vr ® HENNEPIN COUNTY /111. /) I M, Coflfnnli»lon^iV^OA IS, 1997 9. BALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINACE....................... S 18|754.4fl. ILine 3 less Line b)____________________________________________ Stale of: Minnesota County of: Subscribed and sworn lo before me Ibis 25th Notary Public: My Commission expires: Hennepin day of Septemberi992 ARCHITECT’S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on-site observ.iuons and the d.tia comprising the above application, die Architect ceriiliev to the Owner that lo the best of Ihe Architect's knowledge, information and belnM the Work has progressed as indicated, the quality of the Work is m aciord.incc wiiti the Contract Documents, and the Ceniractor is entitled to payment of the a .moun T ClKllHID. AMOUNT CERTIFIED (Attach explanation it amount certified diffeti hom the amount applied (or.) ARCHITECT. Boarman Kroos Pfister and Associates By:Dale: This Cerldicatc is not negotiable Tfie AMOUNT CEKTIFIED is payable only to the Contractor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are wilhoul preiudice lo anv rights of the Owner or'ContraclOf under this Contract._________ lirohtCTyxuiP^APPUCATiON AND CiKIIFICATE FOR PAYMENTCONSTROCIIONPROlca: cm HALl & PUBLIC WORKSOBOWOTO (OVM4DO: cm OF X KRAIB A 525 S 8m ST MDilEAIOLIS MN 55404 fROM (CONTRACTOR): NOLIK (XXOEIE PBQUJCIS VIA lARCHITlCT): BOASMAN, KROOS, PFISTER 415 IUAC street & ASS0CIA3ES UNO LAKES MN 55014 CONTRACT FOR: STRUCIURAL PRECAST (Instruclionk on reverse side) iwci OA 0*2 l»CI> .APPUCATION NO:PIRIOOTO: 09/18/92 ARCWTlCrS PtOIECT NO: Distribution to:.□ OWNIRD ARCHITECT□ CONTRACTOR □ o; CONTRACT DATt: NCFyOffiOl 22, 1991 CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Application is made for Payment, as shown below. In connection with the Contract. ConllmiatiM Sheet, AIA Document C7R3, is attached - CHANCE ORDER SUMMARY' Chanje Orders apptov<-*d in prc'/iouJ monllti oy TOr.M. Ml I I in-i-r n - Aoortr.'ttl Ihij MoiUit _ • •___________ - _ ■ r r ADDITIOMS DEDUCTIONS Murntv Pat j App/c /.! I Saptenbor TOTALS 6867.CO 6867.00 1. ORiaNAl CONTRACT SUM....................................1 2. Net change by Change Orders.................................S 3. COKTa;\CT SUM TO DAH (Line 1 ± 2).....................S A. 701U COMPITI'D A STORED TO DATE.................S (Column C on C703) 5. Rrr,\lM\C.E: e____% of Complelod WorV S ------------ Li Net chenge fay Change Orders 6B67 .QQ The understened Contractor certifles that to the best of the Contracior's Information and belid the Work covered by this Application for Payment Arw _______Iua*k *k« rnninrt noctimenis. that aH amounts nae VC' iInformition and beUet the Worn covereo oy inis cofiiDlaiad ia accoidanca with the Contract Docunienis, that all ainounts Contractor lor Work (or Ic MM# HiaM IBL^SPhoein Is now due. CONTRACTOR: MOtlN OONCREIE PRODUCTS (Column 0 + E on C703) b. — % of Stored Material (Column F 0*1 C703) Tout Retainage (Line 5a + 5b or $ Total In Column I of C703)................................S 6. TOTAL EARNED US5 RE1AINACE..............................5 (line 4 less Line 5 TbuD 7. LESS PREVIOUS CamnCAHS FOR PRTMENT (line k from prior Certificate).............S ^l(o?*>yy 8. CURRWT PAYMENT DUE.........................................S —&lgL«0U * 2106.00, (line 3 less line 6)_______________________ Date:09/18/92 Suteof: HUBfESOIA County ol: AMOl^ Subscribed and sworn to before ^18XH day of StUTL ,1S 92 Notary Publkt'^/^l/^O My Commission etpires: 03/27/95 ARCHITECrS CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In aoointonce wHh the Contract Documents, based on on sMe ®|***^'*”J? ^ ^ daiacamorisina the above appUcation, the Architeci certifies to the Owner that to the best rd^ Aichiieo'* I'oowledge. hlormallon and belief the Work h« progressed as indkalRd, the qu*‘i' r c*. the Work is in accordance with the Contraci Documents . an. Ifi^ Contractor r.ntitlad :o payment of the AMOUNT CERTlFItO. amount ...................................................*----------------- (Attach exp/anaffon if amount ctftifitd difftn from the amount apfAed foci ARCHITECT: Date _______ 11# . This Cerdflcaie is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is p«NNe Contractor named herein. Issuance, payment atsd acceptaiKe or payment are wtmoul prejudice to any nghts of the Owner or Conuactor under this Contract. C78M983 | . J.I aw<# U eriKinef rwr^mra. ooa.a<to40 o»o M O) I CM O o» ri ri o <0 00 e- CM 10 «C1o» Im APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT am document c ?02TO (OWNER): City of Orono1335 Brown Road South Crystal Bay, MN 55323 PROJECT: Orono City llail/Pollce and Public Works Buildings (Instructions on reverse side) n^ct oni of 2 pacis APPLICATION NO: F„ur FROM(CONTRACTOR):Steenberg-Watrud Constr. VIA (ARCHITECT): Boarmnn Kroos Pflster 10255 Inver Grove Trail 222 North 2nd St. CONTRACT FOR- Grove Hts., MN 55076 Minneapolis, MN 55401 PERIOD TO: 9-01-92 9-30-92 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 1124.04 OHiribution to;□ OWNER□ ARCHITECT □ CONTRACTOR□□ CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT CHANCE ORDER SUMMARY Change Orders approved in previous months by Owner TOTAL ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS Approved this. Month • Number '‘Dale Approved f ? * 1« • • *TOO? • * J T , TOTALS Ne». change by Change Orders iiiv. ui91^1 icu v.ciiiiit.5 iiidi lu inc ucsi Of cnc v-onffBCtor5 knowlGucc# information and belief the Work covered by this Application (or Payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor (or Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received from the Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now due. INC. ' 9-25-92 Application is made (or Payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract Continuation Sheet, AIA Document C703, is attached. 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM........................................$ 342.500.00_______ 2. Net change by Change Orders .....................................$ (13.870.753 J. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 ±2).........................$ 328.529.25 4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE.....................$ 236.764.00 (Column C on C703) 5. RETAINACE: a. _10_ % of Completed Work S 23,376.40_____ (Column D + E on C70J) b. --% of Stored Material $ 300.00_____ (Column F on C703) Total Retainage (Line 5a + 5b or Total in Column I of C70J).....................................$ 23.676.40________ 6. TOTAL EARMED LESS RETAINAGE...............................$ 213.087.60________ (Line 4 less Line 5 Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES TOR PAYMENT (Line 6 from prior Certificate)..............S 134.100.00 8. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE...........................................$ 78.987.60 9. BALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINAGE....................S.U5.541.65 Slate of: ^ Subscribed anci'CtSnrrT toj€elore'aveSubscribed an Notary Public: My Commissiorrexpires: ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on site observations and the data comprising the above application, the Architect certifies to the Owner that to the best of the Architect $ knowledge, information and belief the Work has progressed as indicated, the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents, and lire Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT C ERTIFIED. AMOUNT CERTIFIED.......................................................$ ______________ (Attach explanation if amount ccrtrTiec/ differs from the amount appfied for ) ARCHITECT: By:Date •H OOCUMINI C7ei*.smiiAlio-i vn» ciximCAit lOH PAVMiNr • xtAV r«i m'mion. . f |.,m INSTIM!’ ” b/fw VntfK ►V w. V f) r This Certificate 1$ not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIflED W payable only to the Contractor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are without prejudice to any rigi ts of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract. ( IAPPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT ma document C702 (InsInK li«ms on fovcfst* side) ivn (;i oni oi ivw.is10 (OWNER): CITY OF ORONO PROItCT: CITY HALL & PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE ai TLICAI ION NO: THREE (3) Oislfibulimilo:□ OWNIRPERIOD 10:.8/2'»-9/24 □ARCMIUCT□ CONIRACIOR FROM (CONTRACTOR):TED MANNSTEDT & SONS,INC VIA (ARCHITECT): ARCMITtCTS □ PROJECT NO: □ CONTRACT rOR: STRUCTURAI. STEEL, STEEL JOISTS, METAL DECK & MISC. METALS CONTRACT DATE:5/11/92 CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT A|)|)lictiliun i$ made (or Payment, as shown below, in ronneciiun with the Contract. Conlinualiun Sheel, AIA Document C703, is attached. CHANGE ORDIR SUMMARY Orange Orders approved in previous months by Owner TOTAL ADDIIIONS DtDUCTIONS Approved iltis fyiunt^ Number Dale Approved ::cp !! JOS? 1 • . ' {‘P^TOIALS 1_______________ Net chtingc by Change Orders 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM..........................................450,760.00 2. Net change by Change Orders........... .......................S ~ 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 ±2).........................S50.*J6Q«.00. 4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE..................... j?0^260JJ0_ (Column C on C70J) 5. RETAINAGE: a. ___ % of Completed Work 5,076.00 b. (Column D + E on C703) __% of Stored Material $ (Column F on G703) Total Retainage (line 5a f 5b or Total In Column I of C703)......................................f 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE..................................$ the undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of the Contractor's knowledge, iniormation and (relief the Work covered by this Apfrlicalion (or Payment has treen trrnrpU'is'd in actorriance with the Contract Documents, tlial all amounts have been paid by the Contractor (or Work lor which previous Cerlillcales fur Payment were issued and payments received from lltc Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now due. (Line 4 less Line 5 Tulal) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTITICATES FOR PAYMENT (Line 5 from prior Certifica'c)...............$ --------y 8. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE...............................................$ ___— 9. BAUNCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINAGE.......................$ (Line 3 less Line 6) CONIRACTOR: _Daie:^ Stale of: County of: Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of Notary Public: My Commissioti eripires: .19 ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In •iiuircbiicc willi Iho Contr«Kl Dov- .icnls, hiscil on on-sile observations and the data 1 omprisinR the above application, the Architect certifies to the Owner that to the best of the Architect's knowledge, information and belief the Work has progressed as indiiated, the quality of the Work is in accordance wilh the Contract Documents, and Ihe Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT CLRTIfllD. AMOUNT CERTiniD.............................................................% (Attach vxpianation if amount catificd differs from the amount applied ford ARCMIUCT: Oy:Date: This Certificate is not negfrtiable. The AMOUNT CERTITIED is payable only lo IIm Conlrai tor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment arc withuu (irejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract. AIA OOCUMfNI CTfl • AmiCAIIUN A.NO 1 IRIIIIt All lOR fAVMlHI • M.SY Vm\H)mor4 • AIA' • © m} [lU'i! or ARnnnris i;is nivv x>rk avinui nvv vvasminc .ion nr johoa APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT aia document G702 (instfucuon? on reverse side) pacion<o> / PActsAPPLICATION NO; ^.a-TO (OWNER):City of Orono 1335 Brown Uoad South Crystal Day, MN 55323 ^ FROM (CONTRACTOR): A/pRTH^ I 0^ cTl OA/ CONTRAa FOR: ' PROIECT;Orono City Uall/Police and Public Works Buildings PERIOD TO: ARCHITECT'SVIA (ARCMHECT): n>i Doarinan Kroos Pfister and Assoc. PROjECT NO: 1124.Ufl , 222 North Second Street Minneapolis, MN 55401 CONTRACT DATE: Oiflribulion lo:(D OWNER□ ARCHITECT□ CONTRACTOR□□ CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT CHANCE ORDER SUMMARY Change Orders approved In previous months by Owner TOTAL ADDITIONS % DEDUCTIONS Approved this Month 9NumberDate Approved TOTALS Ncl change by Change Orders __ The undersigned Conlraclor cerlilies lhal lo inc oesi oi me Lomracior » rhuwii.uhv .-. InTormaiion and belief Ihc Worit covered by Ibis Application for Paymcni has been completed In accordance with the Conlracl Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the Conlraclor lor Work lor which previous Ccriilicales (or Payment were issued and payments received Irom the Owner, and lhal current payment shown herein is now due. CONTRACTOR: donna J. MIRiAUU^ NOTARY PUBUC MINNESOTA WASHINGTON COUNTV Mv Comm EK|»rec 3-5-97 Application is made (or PaymenI, as shown below, in conncclion with the Conlracl. Continuation Sheet, AIA Document C703, is altacited. 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM..............'.......................»------- 2. Net change by Change Orders....................................S-------- p — 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 i 2).......................$-----’^.7^/—--- 4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE.....................4-----/to (Column C on C703) 5. RETAINACE; ,, , , a. % o( Completed Work $ —/to, /W (Column D + E on C703) b____% of Stored Material $---------------------------- (Column F on C703) Total Relainage (Line 5a + 5b or j / yj *-o Tolal in Column I o* 0703)...................................4------- , ' 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINACE................................4----^ T T-P—:------ (Line 4 less Line 5 Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR p'7a. • PAYMENT (Line 6 from prior Cerli(icale)..............4-----------' < ' ■ ■ ^ «. CURRfNT paymtnt ....................................................» 9. BALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINACE.....................4 . ^ ----, _____(Line 3 less Line 6)____________________________;-----------—--------— Stale o(: (V\\ n Counlyof: IxJ.'LSaKnvytftll Subscribed andp^rn lo before me ibis A4 jxiToxo, tv.^rru.'L.-iiujbV' ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In accordance with the Conlracl Documents, based on on site observations and the data comprising ibe above application, the Architect ccrlilics lo the Owner lhal lo iru best of the Architect’s knowledge, information and heltel the Work has progressed as Indicated, the quality o( the Work Is In atcordance with he Conlracl Documents, and ihe Conlraclor is entitled lo payment of the AMOUNi CERTIFIED. AMOUNT CERTIFIED.......................................................>--------------—----- (Attach explanation if amount certified uiffcts from the amount applied for.) ARCHITECT: Doarman Kroos Pfistor and Associates By:Dale: This Ccriilicalc is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only lo the Conlraclor named herein. Issuance, payrhcnl and acceptance oT payment are wrihool prejudice lo any rights o( Ihe Owner or Conlraclor under this Contract. AlAOOCCMlM C .. •' »r'B t'AY, ................. ^ •<>•»C792 19t3 • . I :APP u LiON and CERTIFICATF FOR PAYMFNf .m-------------------- PROIECT: . noWNE mctsTO (OWNER):City o£ Orono 1335 Brown Road South Crystal Bay, MN 55323 F RO M, (CONT RACTOR):APPLICATION NO: IPERIOD TO: 9/30/92i)M.(CONTRACTOR);V oifjv oorKDr CCNTRACT FOR: PROJECT: . , . ^Orono City llall/Police anaPublic Works Buildings r^rKroos P£i»tor and Aaaoc. “.NO:TsM" oan:Distribution to:□ OWNER□ ARCHIUCT□ CONTRACTOR□□ooH!IK)HXC applicllon U n«de for as ConlWmation Sheel, A1A Document G703. rs Jllached. 'change order summary ___ Change Order* approved In orevious months by Owner TOTAL additions 2,512.00 __ DEDUCTIONS 9,467.00 Aonroved th» Month 0 Number Date Approved totals 2.512.00 9,487.00 _______________________________—------------------------r Net change by ChaoRC Ortlcrs --------------------------------------------------------------- «mR.7RB.QO 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM.....................................JJ ft .oyB .OOT 2. Net eVtoge by Change ............................................ * qy gjnO H* M 2. Net change by Change Oeden.......^ 3.00 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE Itlne 1 * 2) ...................! 4. TOTAL COMPinED A STORED TO DATE................... (Column C on G703) S-RBAINACE; ,:n-> nn a. JJl % of Completed Work S , 1 ----- (Column D + E or» G703) *- i, 10 % of Stored Material S------!------------------ (Column F on C70J) Total Retalnage (Line 5a + 5b or A • _ t______^ B B W^. MWU1 \ < O Zzoc H X I Retalnage (Line 5a + 5o or ^ 6.922 ^00 Total in Column I of G703).................................. 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS ..................................................' (Line < lesj Lino 5 Total) 7. LESS PREV'IOUS CCRTinC/JCS LOR ^ 0 / PAYMENT (Line 6 from prior Certificate)..............> ___ v 0. CURMNI IWVMtNI DUE....... .................................*coniplxcd in lot P.ymcnl v«r. herein Is now due. 9 O O H M Xn M • • () ........... (Line 3 less Line 6)_____________ —---------------—------ IT of- County ol: , sL^'L .nd .«.» io bel,.. m. U,it •' CX^ y'jiy**' MofK Lt^-pt (So^coU NTf: NOiary l uuiiw. late- 1992 commission expires; g/^B/9S . ^ „ ^ _------------------------------------:------------- amount CIRTlf 110...............................•; * • ARCHITECT'S cwnFic^^^^ the Conuactor I* entiUrrd to payment of the AMOUNi ciKiir.r . 0% K> A b* A U (I Date:----- IM. Cftiltod. is no. wsolirtilc. Th. CTtZlSil 9 M wTnTo''. UnlTJ!l.-X«-lMna vlolar.. US repT«9''* •«» FdRCE HflRDUflRE TEL:c 02.92 7:41 No.001 P.02 7 • ■» Application No. t ^0/23/92 . certificate for Payment 9/25/92 <« AW Docuwnt 0702) t. Force Job NO-• « rcojoct »MM. ^ HAFD'JARE l UFO. CO. HINNEAPOLIS, MH 05 •D«4imOUN IS attached. - 35.45^*99trade payment breakdown . . . . . . . . . . ... I , -«„*ract sum............................... .......................................... $ 35,^63.00 1, original chanft* Ordtce ....................... ............................................. « 4,718.00 *• <»"• V.W ............................ 5. »,t.inaa*' , ,_„ut.d •otW (coliw B ♦ ®> ............ S . ,71.,0 !• °oF « «t.i 'oiu™. ................I ?U.I Mtoin... <“”•‘‘..o * - 5 tot,).) ............« lot.) for PoyMot .................... 2.6.20 ’• ’'‘'■uot ’'6 from prior e.ctlflc.te.) ............................................. ,1.216.00 ••■ asssss-**' ■.. The «nd.r.ign.a Contactor ;SS;a-.-S.ag; - *■■ 2,00.. u, - Notary Public» ^ ARCHITEcrS C6MIF1CATB FOR FAFMWT2;srr..-£S5 “r.b:2.KW^^^^as.rs;u ;;;j;; ;si*.i-,£ SS. _ Contractor 1* entitieu ........................................5------------ amount certified ......................................... ^ ________ ______________- ' ■ ' ’ -I nnlv to tVlCARCHItlCt, ----------------'7r^hT»K.0>n C2RTIFU0 10 ,ubout Thl. cttlflc.i. "'UULc. F*»"“,"arr ”"5*.rthl. C0»tr.0t. Contractor n-med j" of the Owner or Contrectc prejudice to any rignt. % • •APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT ma oocumim &-(c (InsIriK iion^ oti rovnsc* <i»h»| iw.j »)ni or iv\(;islO (OWNER):City of Oron'o 1315 Brown Rcl. S. Crvstnl. B.iy, MN 55323 I’ROJEd: Cilv Hall & Public Works Orono, MN AtTlICAIION NO: onemUOUIO: ‘)/30/92 FRONA (CONTRACTOR): Mnl^'allV I nc •VIA (AH(HliiCI): Kraiis Anderson Ml’bS 525 S. Htb St. ^ MPI.S, MN 55404 CONiRACf FOR: Divisions //14 // 20 drywall & EIFS ARCHIItCrS PRCirCF NO: Disirihiilinn In:I J OWNER I I ARCIIIIFCI □ CONIRACtOR U U CONIRACT OATF CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Applirnlion rniuh* for Ptiymi’nl, .i<; shown Ih *Iow, in connection with the Contract. Cnnlinualion Sheet, AIA Document G703, is titt.ichecl. CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY ! Cbanpc Orders approved in previous monihs by Owner TOIAL ADD! HONS DLDUCIIONS Approved thii Month ( Number Dale Approved f;rc T* .* . i •-• • • ^ • TOIAIS Net change by Change Orders 1. ORtGINAL CONIRACT SUM..............................................S ^165 ^X100^ 00 2. Net change by Change Orders .........................................$________ -0- 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (line 1 2)...........................$ 000^00 4. TOIAl COMPIIIED A SIORED TO t)AfC.......................$______4^300.00 (Column G on G70i) 5. RETAINACE: a.___% o( Completed Work S 45Q_____________ b. (Column D -f E on G703.' __% of Stored Material 4sn.nn The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of the Contractor's knowledge, information and belief the Work covered by this Application for Payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor (or Work for which previous Certificates (or Payment were issued and payments received from the Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now due. (Column F on G7(H) Total Relainage (line Sa r 5b or Tci*al in Column I of Ci70T)........................................S_______ 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE.....................................$______4 ^Q50.QQ (line' 4 less I inc* 5 Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERIIflCATES EOR PAYMENT (line 6 from prior Certificate)................$____________Q______ 8. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE....................................................S 4.050.00 9. BALANCE TO FINISH, PIUS RETAINACE..........................$ 160.950.00 (line 3 less line 6) -u/ CONTRACTOR:Miilcahy, Inc.stale o(: MinnesoF.'i Oyi 'TTAlijQ A._____Date: Notary PubliOs^/^^^ My Commissiyf^xpircs: County of: Washington ofSubscribed (liulsfworn lo bclore me this tJay of Sept . ^9 92 ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AMOUNT CERliriED In accordance with the Contract D chumicmi Is. based on on-site observations and the data comprising the above apptic ation, the Arclii*(»cl cc'rlifies to the Owner that to the best of the Architect's knowledge, information and bi'lief the Work has firogressed as indicated, the qualify of il^e Work is in accordanc e w ith the C oniracf CToc uments, and the Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT C l Kill III). (Attjch cnpLituiiimi if nmnunt irrtiftrd dtflrr% from r/ie arrioi/nf rppttrd for.) ARatllECt. Hy:Dale lies Certificate is no! negoliahic. the AMOUNT ClKIlfirD is fiayatite only to llie (Ontrac tor named herein. Issuance, payment and ac c rptance of payTnent are williuut pr •jmlice to any rigjils of lire Owner or Contrat.lor under Ifiis C'ontract. AU DOCU^U^ii c*7®i • Amu AIU)N AND t IKIMltAH 11 )R TAY Ml N I • M Vi I9fl| M HIION • AIA* • t 19111 1IN AKMilCAN INS1IIUM Of AKiMlllC IS. t^W N»»W YORK AVir4l*l NW. WASI UNI. K >N OC /nnnf»G7t2 isn i APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT aia document c/uj (InstriKlions on fi»vcisi» rA(,i oni or I’A(.isK) (OWNER): Kmus-Anderson Con struct ion ’ Orono Public Works Garage AI'I'LIC AllON NO: 1 Disitihution lo;525 S 8th Street 1 1 <, >V\ N( RMinneapolis, MN 55404 I’LRIOl) lO:1 1 AKUillU 1 TROM (CONIRACTOK): VIA (ARCHIIECT): 1 i CONIR^. I» Hi Doarnian, Kroos,ARCHHICrS IJ Technical Surfacing Inc. 6321 Bury Drive Suite 4 Pfister & Assoc.PKOircr NO: 4 059 u CONIRACT FOR: Bden Prairie, MN 55346 CONIRACI DAIl:7/28/92 CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Applit.iiton is in.idi* foi 1’ny.iK‘nt, ,ns shown ln*lo\v, in tunnutlion wu , Ihe Coiiliticl. Cunlinualion Sheet, AIA Document C703, is jll.i<hfd. CHANC.t ORDER SUMMARY Ch.uif'e Orders appeo-ed i;: previous inunihs by Owner lOIAl yVpprovj'd l|ji/i)f^9n|h NumiKT'O.Be'Approved SH’ .1 ' m ?. < •>« >'Vr''|y lOlAI S ADUIIIONS IMDUt.llONS Nol (hange by Change Orders 1. ORIGINAL CONTRAC1 SUM......................................$ 8,850 » 00 2. Net change by Change Orders..................................$_____________ I. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (line 1-21......................$ .3 .8iO...OJl 4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE...................$ 8.850.00 (Column G on G70.I) S RETAINACE: a ------% ol Compleled Work ees-oo Ihv undersigned ConlraUor l erlifies Ihal to the hesi of the C<»nlr.ii tor s knowledf^e, information and belief the Work covered by this Ap|)li(.ilion for Payment has been compleled in siccorclance with the Contruct Pocumenls, that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor for Work for which pievious C'ertilicates for Payment were issued and payments ri'ceiveil from t* t* Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now due. iColumn I) ♦ E on C'i7()h b _% of Stored Material S___________________ (Column I on Ci703) Total Ketaina^e (Line 5a f 5b or Total in Column I of Ci7()f)........................................$ (). TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINACE....................................$ (Line 4 less Line 5 Total) 7 LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES TOR PAYMENT (Line 6 from prior Certificate)................$-e- CONI KAt;i Hv; B. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE...........................................S ,8-^050.-^ BALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINACE.....................S__________ ___ (Line 3 b'ss Line f») State of:County of: <10 Date: Subscribed and sworn to before me Ibis day ol,19 Notary I’uirlic: My Commissiofi expires* ^ ARCHITECT^ERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In accordance with the Contract Due umi'nts, liased on i»n-site fihservations and thi» data comprising Ihr above applu ation, tlu» Arc hitec 11 ri|iln»s to the ()wm*r that to the best uf llie A. chilc‘ct's knowledge, information and laeliel the Work hus pro^iessed as indicated, the quality of the Work is in accoidaru .* with the* Contr ict Doc iiments aiul !l !• Contractor is entitled to payment of the ANUKJNI ( (Kllflll) AMOUNT CF.RTirilD / (AUtich cw/j/j/Kif/o/i if amount evtUhvd dittvis fmni (In* dtwninl .ipp/rei/ fuf.) ARCHITK I: By:Date AIA OOCUMINf c;7fri» AmiC AIION AND ( I Kill K All fOR PM MIN I • MA> I'KU 11IIIK )N • AIA* • t |»WU nil \siiKH AN iNsnM;n oi arc nine IS. vopv winui h, w wAMHfi(.n»N dc .mmpm. A'^riMirir;'Unti«*«n««> * ‘ - • • • -i*r Ihis Cerlificaie is nf>i m*j;oliahle Ihe AMOLtNI CIKliflM) is payable only In the (Ontrac lor namcnl hc»rein Issuance, payment and a< c epiaru eof payment are without p.eiudiie to any nghls ol Ihe tcAtHt JANt I I Molar/ Public • Mi'mssota H'i.>nrp«i County application and certificate for payment >'TO (OWNER):City of Orono1335 Brown Road SouthCrystal Day, MN 55323 FROM (CONTRACTOR);Allied Mechanlcrl Systems CONTRACT^^n? MN 55350CONTRACT FOR: Mechanical Work AIA DOCUMEN7 C 702 (Instruciions on rcvcfse side) CACt oni of SrACtS 'PROJECT:Orono City Hal 1/Police and Public Works Buildings APPLICATION NO: 5PERIOD TO: 9-3Q-92 CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT ™ ««a,„ECTh ARCHIEECrS Pfister and Assoc, project n O: 1124.04 222 North Second Street Mir/i‘-apolis, 55401 contract DATE; Dislribulion lo:□ OWNER□ architect□ CONERACTOK□□ CHANCE ORDER SUMMAKY “---------------------------------------------------------------—---------------------------------------------------------------—--------------------- -------------- Change Orders approved .n previous months by Osvncr ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS TOTAL 8,086.71 Approved this Month Number Dale Approved TOTALS 3,086.71 Ncl change by Change Orders (8^86.71) Applicalion is made (or Payment, as shown below, in connection with the Coniraci Conlinualion Sheet, AIA Document C703, is attached. 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM......................................... j 390.000.OQ ’ 2. Nel change by Change Orders......................................j (8.086.71 ^' o ......................................................... ........V v> t you mix 3 CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (I ine li2)........................381^913. A T/^TA I f~\ AiniCTrrv 0 ____ _ ............................y 4. TOTAL COMPLETED & SIORED TO DATE..................... % 130,S7Q.79 (Column G on G703) 5. RETAINACE: a. % of Completed Work $ 6,461.00 (Column D T E on G703) b.------% of Stored Material $ 6,592.00 herein iwtwTir’* COtyfir^TOR: Mechanical Systems of Hutchinson, Inc _______Dale:______ (Column F on G703) Total Rctainage (line 5a * 5b or Total in Column I o( C.703)............................ | 13,053.00 G TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINACE ..!!!!!!!!..!!’”!!$ 117,476^29 (line 4 less line 5 Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT (Line 6 from prior Certificate)........... 1 82,719.00 0 CURRENT PAYMENT DUE.......................... ...'!!!!!. S J-T,757.29 9. BALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINACE...................... $ 264.437.00 _____(Line 3 less Line G) ~ 9-23-92 ARCHITFCT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMINT In accordance with Ihe Contract Documents. t).ised on on site ob.ervdlions and the data coinprising the above applualion, the AiHiitoti ccriifies to Hu 0.v:vi that to Hie liesi ot the Architeefs knowledge, intoimalion and beliel the Work has iirofressed as mdicaled, Ihe quality of Ihe Work is in accorri.uue with Ihe Contract TToannenls. and Ihe CfMitracior is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT ( I Kill Hi) State of: Minnesota r County of: McLeod Subscribed <in(^wor/i lo bJiorcmfic lhis< -23rd" day o( Sept. Notary III t n i , My Commission expiresX 6^-97 AMOUNT CERTIFIED .L fJO'At V l•(•|!l K. r.'i;::,; . o.. ' McLEOO COUNTY i (AlUtl) c»f)ljna(/on ii nmnuiu certified differ, from Ihe .imounl .ipphcd for.) ARoiiHCT; Boarman Kroos Pfister and Associates By:----------------------------------------------Djie: ‘^^“^•'''*'"t ''*'0'‘'''f'">‘ IKIIII( Ml K)R|-\V.MIN| .m,SS IsBI IIV MON • AIA- • eini ltd AMtiucAN iNsnmu or arcmiucis . .;js mw sokk avino ,. n w . "vas ,,.nc .u)n o ( ■ !■ » I ^mmim ...............^ I V. • _________________ ^ ________ 3 Ins Certi(u.,ie is not negotiable. The AMOUNT rfPTTiir/ is payable only lo the WAHHlM-i Unllt.nied pholocopylng viol..,, U S copy.iahl l.w, iod I, ,..!,|eM lo l,g,l p,„„c.llon. 09/28^92 09S92 X ^12 784 3 . .;l outo spr CO ► automatic SPRIMKLER CO. 1612 94lh Une N.E. • Blaine, Minnesota 55434 • (6’2) 7Z»:-Z902 • To:KRAUS ANDERSON ODNSIRUCTION CWTO: ^ ^9-25-92^"2- 'iMINNBUPOLIS/ MN 55404 Et»ne i >-- 7291__ FAX 7B4-57»^ Tor The Period FKm 09-01-92 To 10-01-52 Inclasivo PARTIAL Regueet No. 2 RIi;CR0N0 dlK HALL/POBLIC VgORKS - CRYSTAL MI^7^CL.v/^A ^___ Iten No Deecriptlon Contxact Amt pie ted to Previously % date cx^rpleted Amt This Estimate II #2 #3 14 15 16 #7 18 Material,Including Taxes Design Labor ( £xp. Fabrication Labor Frei^t iTtttallation Tabor & E^. Pennits 4 Bonds subcontract 6 purdiascs Total All Change Ordera contract Totals 18400.00 6100.00 3700.00 220.00 16470.00 1200.00 500.00 6580.00 53170.00 70% 90% 70% 70% 40% 100% 90% 13% 12880.00 5490.00 2590.00 152.CO 6588.00 1200.00 450.00 840.00 O.CO 0.00 30190.00 5520.00 4270.00 1110.00 110.00 0.00 1200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12210.00 CHANGE CRI£RS 11 MEZZANINE EXPANSION #2 MODIFY HEADER ♦3 INBTITOTICNAL READS 7360.00 1220.00 1460.00 42.00 6566.00 0.00 450.00 840.00 0.00 0.00 17980.00 5645.00 840.00 95.00 CHANGE order TUTALS 6580.00 Original Contract Amount Additions 10 Data Revised contract Amount Contract Sumery 46590.00 6580.00 53170.00 TOTAL OOMPLETSD TO DATE PREVIOUS BIU.INGS PREVIOUS PETAINA(£ •WIS APPLICATION TOR PAYMENP UESS ranMIAGE NCT MOUNT THIS PAYMENT UNT STATUS 1221.00 1798.00 /Uo f ------- Eft7. lU*/, 0 % eo ?. C.rt, ( O #7. ^ xj, p£u/ £o ioo7cPiv 65*’'P-' 30190.00 12210.00 17980.00 16182.00 ^ A:V*.3r8 total mcuwt eaiwed to cate I total amount PETAINED TO DATE J 8 10% 3019.00 total I«MAIMING to be BILLSD ter 30 DAYS PENP»LTY 1.5% 30190.O0 22980.00 pldsse pay ft^cm t-is invoice nu 9 I 2 fe* ^'9 09-29-92 0909AM P002 813 iAPPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT aia document C702 (Instructions on rovprse side) met oni ot meisTO (OWNER): City of Orono 1335 Drown Road South Crystal Bay, MN 55323 PROJECT: City Hall & Public Works Garage - Orono, MN APPLICATION NO: Four PERIOD TO: 09/30/92 FROM (CONTRACTOR): Gephart Electric Co., Inc .VIA (ARCHITECT): Boarman, Kroos, Pfister 3600 LaBore Road & Associates St. Paul, MN 55110 222 North Second Street CONTRACT FOR: Electrical Minneapolis, MN 55401 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: Distribution to: □ OWNER □ architect □ CONTRACTOR□□ CONTRACT DATE: CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Application is made for Payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. Continuation Sheet, AIA Document C703, is attached. CHANCE ORDER SUMMARY Change Orders approved in previous months by Owner _____ TOTAL ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS Approved lhiC>Mohlh Number Date Approved r I *M 41 o , . # •.. ^ 1 1992 .................... - ■ -r- .r jQjy^LS Net change by Change Orders 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM......................................... $ 2. Net change by Change Orders......................................S 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 i 2)......................... $ 4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE.....................S (Column C on C703) 5. RETAINACE: a.___% of Completed Work $ 8,725.90 279,400.00 ()T()0 279.400.00 07.259.00 (Column D + E on C703) b.___% of Stored Material $0.00 8,725.90 78.533.IQ The undersigned Conductor certifies that to the best of the Contrac tor s knowledge, information and belief the Work covered by this Npplic aiion (or Payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor for Work for which previous Certificates lor f’ayment were issued and payments received Irom the Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now due. CONTRACTOR: Gephart Electric Co., Inc. :/Rv: (Column F on C703) Total Retainage (Line 5a + 5b or Total in Column I of 0703)......................................$ _ 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE..................................S _ (Line 4 less line 5 Total) 7. LESS PREVIOs'S CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT ;line 6 from prior Certificate).................$ 65,040.30 B. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE.................................................S 13.492.80 9. BALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINAGE .......................S 200.866.90 (Line 3 less Line 6) ,______________________________ ^(Zouj U v up Rams«»v 09/18/92 Slate of: MinnesoCi Subscribed and sworn to bt Notary Public: Mv Commission expires: ^ odMIt ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In acctipdance with the Contract Umuments. I)ased on on site observations and the • lata comprising the above application, the Arc hifert certifies to the Owner that to the liesi ot itu* .Vrchti'Ht s knowledge, ’ntormation and heluM ihe Work has progressed as iiulit aled '.he quality ol lh«» Work is in accoroaru e with the Confrai I iJoc umenis. and •he Cunt lA,’or is entitled to pavment ol the AMOUNI ( rKTIflll) AMOUNT CIRIIFIED / 19 92 Y i tAltmh c\f)Lination it twuuint ccrtftird dittvis trnm thv jmount limited /or t ARCHirfCT: 6 -- lU:Date: Flits Certificate is not negotiable. Fbe AMOUNT CEKIIFIID is pavable only to Ihe Contractor named herein Issuance, pavment and ac i eptam of pa\menl aie without prejudKe to any ru’hts ot thi» Owner or ConTr.u tor under ttiis Contract. TO: FROH DATB Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator October 22, 1992 SUBJECT: Proposals For Telephone and Computer Cabling For the New City Facilities As part of the new facilities construction project all offices and workstations will be provided with cabling for connection to the telephone system and to a computer network system. Proposals for providing and installing the cable were received from nine vendors. The cabling project includes three areas: 1. Cabling for the telephone system. 2. Cabling for a computer network including a fiber optic cable from the Public Works building to the Administrative building. 3. Cabling and speakers for a radio monitoring system in the Police Department. The computer network cabling will serve the current LOGIS system and will serve a future local network. The fiber optic cable is needed for computer communication between the Public Works building and the Administrative building because of the distance between the two buildings. The Police radio monitoring system will enable monitoring of radio communications in the various offices and work areas of the department. The- lowest cost proposal is from A.U.S. Communications at $15^315.00. The proposal costs listed do not include sales tax which must be paid on the materials portion of the project. The sales tax will increase the A.U.S. cost to approximately $16,000.00. Staff has contacted references for A.U.S. and has found that all references are satisfied with the work A.U.S. has done for them. It is recommended that A.U.S. be selected as the vendor for the cabling project at a cost of $15,315.00 plus applicable sales tax. VENDOR Dell Communications P 6 T Communications Apollo Communications Global Communication Services Comm-Tech Systems Telephone Specialists II Electronic Security Protection U.S. Premise Networking A.U.S. Communications PROPOSAL COST $40,274 23,450 21,379 20,230 19,586 18,350 17,000 16,649 15,315 * !<( TO:Mayor and City Council /! i FROM:Ren Moorse, City Administrator ^A DATE:October 22, 1992 / SUBJECT:Building Signage at the New City Facilities e % Each of the four buildings in the new facilities campus will have exterior signage at their main entrances. The proposed wording for the signage is as follows: 1. "Council Chambers" 2. "Police" 3. "Orono Public Works" There ate a number of alternatives for signage for the administrative building. A. "City Offices" B. "Administrative Offices" C. "City Hall" D. "Village Hall" The selection of wording for the signs needs to be completed as soon a possible. /i TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse» City Administrator October 23, 1992 S % SUBJECT: City Administrator One Year Anniversary Salary Adjustment The City Administrator's one year anniversary was September 9, 1992. The City's Compensation Plan calls for a salary adjustment to Step 2 of the salary range at the one year a ini versary. The 1992 Step 2 amount is $58,498.00. The Compensation Plan also calls for a salary adjustment at the first of the year commensurate with the annual increase made to the salary range. This increase maintains the salary at Step 2 of the salary range. 1 LIST OF LICSMSSS FOR COUNCIL FOR MEETING OF October 26, 19'• '' No licenses • I t • « .1 ^• * V \ t J t \ •iT ^ ##/ / O 10/11/92 PR: 149 CB PRREGOR EMP tt NAME 471688060 474563339 475921819 471840871 475443862 476663143 472503991 469526026 476643387 475989721 471963129 468821018 468622840 472529007 468701868 507585424 469686562 468420832 469087884 474667812 475380151 477500666 475444249 477463877 472745694 388625358 471569863 47314162'! 477823810 477647279 475604753 504260307 472500574 121262417 480843542 476018974 477700023 3345C6281 477028779 473108428 468909535 476783251 470700901 469848107 475382983 473746173 470566529 469629194 475569177 267460042 472563051 474663296 470704904 475505292 468629488 S00403192 477881539 ANDERSON. BRUCE L BOBZIEN. SUE A BORIS. SCOTT W BOSMA. JAMIE L BRINKHAUS. JOHN F CARLS'^N. STEPHEN C CHESW CK. GARY B CORNIQK. JAMES L DELANEY. JANE E DEMBOUSKI. JAY C DRESSEL. ROBERT P ENGLISH III. IRVING ERICKSON. DOUGLAS J ERICKSON. KURT R FISCHENICH. DAN T FRIT2LER. JOHN M GAFFRON. MICHAEL P GERHARDSON. JOHN R GOMAN. DAVID J GREGORY. JAMES D HALLIN. DOROTHY M HANSEN. STEVEN C HANSING. CAROL J HASEMAN. CAROLE HEUER. JOHN C JENSEN. ROONEY W JOHNSON. BRADLEY P JOSTROM. FOREST J KAMPMEYER. THOMAS R KARNIT2, RICKY 0 KENNEN. JANICE M KNUTSON. CHARLOTTE A KUEHN. THOMAS M MABUSTH. JEANNE A MCNICHOLS. DAVID L MILLS JR. WALTER H MOORSE. RONALD J MOROWC2YNSKI. JAMES NELSON. DAVID D OAS, DANIEL O OBERAIGNER. SCOTT Q OBRIEN. RANDY L OMAN. LYLE E PALMER. GREGORY A OUAST. WAYNE A RATHBUN. BARRY J SCHOENHOFF. JOHN B SKREEN. DALE S STEFFENHAGEN. RONALD SULLIVAN. STEPHEN X THOMTON. MARK R TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE F TOMC2YK, MARK W VANG. BRUCE L VEE, LINDA S WALTERS. LINDA Q WECKMAN. STEPHEN J YTO CURRENT DPT GROSS GROSS 31 34525.89 1569.33 31 21001.03 987.52 31 5101.59 226.60 12 12306.73 560.65 42 32907.90 1568.56 61 4460.75 420.UO 31 35789.62 1680.9631••7468 13 1717.22 93 3963.81 181.13 31 29936,71 1380.30 93 437.50 5.00 31 35329.04 1561.11 93 579.00 84.00 31 3199T.84 1528.40 31 361Si>. 14 1483.05 31 3^691.37 1646.963330085.11 1434.02 42 42032.99 2120.68353209.43 117.46 42 27443.59 1128.80 12 25915.74 1235.28 42 24184.18 1013.21 31 11846.08 535.09 12 17801.21 888.72 61 6301.00 640.00 93 2762.50 212.503133102.13 1497.84 93 2354.66 110.25 93 500.00 215 00 31 3427.83 82.74 31 5059.32 227.52 15 20717.68 987.52 15 44258.59 2109.61 33 37676 08 1795.85 31 18404.14 1155.38 93 2893.00 129 25 12 44806.40 2238.40 31 34938.41 1497.84 35 4080 62 167.33 93 1768 16 207.00 42 22437 41 948 87 92 24552 79 1113 63 33 30084 97 1434.01 42 22269.55 1161.23 92 295.18.39 1579.09 92 24234.49 1054.33 31 5946 19 427.45 42 23703.48 1013 219325916 94 1235 29 31 40765 21 2004 083131256 87 1634.573132482 13 1459.283131799 59 1497 843325915 69 1235 281213735 55 948 871523534 54 1145.283321969.01 1088.00 59.334.39 1992 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATEHC913SHC913SHC913IHC913I HC9139 HC9139 HC9139 HC9139 HC9139 HC9139 HC9139HC9139 HC9139 HC9139 HC9139 HC9140 HC9140 NC9141 HC9142 HC9142 HC9U2 HC9142 HC9142 HC9142 HC9142 HC9142 HC9142 HC9142 HC9142 HC9143 HC9144 HC9145 HC9149 HC9147 HC914I 10/07/9210/07/9210/07/9210/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 0 % AMOUNT CHECK REGISTERVENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. 'XNV1.’.28 MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 01-4324-099-174.86 MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 01-4324-129-313.11 MINNEQASCO UTILITIES 72-4324-549-91286.84 312.01 • MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 73-4324-569-92 439.9 1 1ST NATL FICA 8/30 01-4142-039-12 306.89 1ST NATL FICA 8/30 01-4142-069-15 120.02 1ST NATL FICA 8/30 01-4142-111-31 132.39 1ST NATL FICA 8/30 01-4142-115-31 SIS. 98 1ST NATL FICA 8/30 01-4142-174-33 16.27 1ST NATL FICA 8/30 01-4142-185-35 152.64 1ST NATL FICA 8/30 01-4142-249-42 16.89 1ST NaTL FICA 8/30 01-4142-290-61 113.08 1ST NATL FICA 8/30 72-4142-549-91 169.62 1ST NATL FICA 8/30 73-4142-569-92 110.00 2,594.32 • 1ST NATL FI^A 8/30 74-414.»-590-93 963.02 SAFE BEN SEPT FEE 01-1050-000-00 143.00 1,106.02 • SAFE BEN SEPT FEE 01-4306-299-72 350.00 350.00 • ST MN DUES 01-4380-039-12 i 4.56 US WEST TELEPHONE 01-4320-039-12 8i.66 US WEST TELEPHONE 01-4320-059-14 42.33 US WEST TELEPHONE 01-4320-069-^: 187.06 US WEST TELEPHONE 01-4320-129-31 88.04 US WEST TELEPHONE 01-4320-174-33 82.07 US WEST TELEPHONE 01-4320 l'5-34 84.66 US WEST TELEPHONE 01-4320-249-42 12.69 US WEST TELEPHONE 72-4320-543-91 29.62 US WEST TELEPHONE 73-4320-569-92 112.56 US WEST TELEPHONE 74-4320-590-93 134.90 943.25 * US WEST TELEPHONE 74-4323-590-93 900.00 900 00 * POST.MASTER POSTAGE 01-1262-000-00 200 00 200.00 • ORONO PETTY CASH 01-1040-000-00 813.74 813 74 • POSTMASTER YARD WASTE MAILNG 01?32i 295-85 160.00 160 00 • ZACP CONF 01-4356-129-31 15.00 15.00 • MCPA MTQ 01-4356-129-31 48.93 US WEST TELEPHONE 01-4320-129-31 09-30-92 PAGE 1 • PC. i MESSAGEMANUALMANUALMANUALMANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL < MANUAL 1' MANUAL MANUAL f UNUA L MANUAL MANUAL * >* • i f* * • HC91S1 10/07/92 52.95 52.95 •APPOUO HC91S2 10/07/92 800.00 800.00 * R MOORSE HC9153 10/07/92 10,972.50 10,972.50 • NEW HECH HC91S7 HC9157 HC9157 HC91S7 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 19.66 7.67 4.25 338.33 369.91 • MINNEQASCO MINNEGASCO MINNTGASCO MINNEGASCO HC9158 HC91SI 10/07/92 10/07/92 975.41 143.00 1,118.41 • SAFE BEN SAFE BEN HC9159 HC9159 HC9159 HC91S9 HC9159 HC9159 HC91 1 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/07/92 10/0'/92 10/07/92 2,248.02 3,478.64 7,822.53 9,901 33 :l,0.00- <i29.09 195 45 ^3,975.06 • BOARMAN • BOARMAN • HC9160 10/07/92 10.00 10.00 * MN DARE OFF 1992 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT CHECK REGISTERVENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV 09-30-92 PAGE 3 i P.O. • MESSAGEHC9161HC91filHC9161HC9161HC9161HC9161HC9161HC9161HC9161HC9161HC9161HC916110/07/92 435.29 1ST NATL10/07/92 154.42 1ST NATL10/07/92 306.91 1ST NATL10/07/92 125.60 1ST NATL10/07/92 132.91 1ST NATL10/07/92 515.99 1ST NATL10/07/92 16.58 1ST NATL10/07/92 657.92 1ST NATL10/07/92 17.10 1ST NATL10/07/92 110 66 1ST NATL10/07/92 165.99 1ST NATL10/07/92 109.46 2,748.83 •1ST NATL13,185.86 FUND 01 TOTAL23,975.06 FUND 25 TOTAL2.000.00 FUND 26 TOTAL377.62 FUND 72 TOTAL12,216.41 FUND 73 TOTAL578.29 FUND 74 TOTAL52.333 04 TOTAL FICAFICAFICAFICAFICAFICAFICAFICAFICAFICAFICAFICA 9/309/309/309/309/309/309/309/309/309/309/309/30GENERAL FUND91 PUBLIC FACIL CONSTR92 STUBBS BAY SWR CONS WATER OPERATING FUND SEWER OPERATING FUND GOLF COURSE OPERATING I 01-414201-414201-414201-414201-414201-414201-414201-414201-414272- 414273- 414274- 4142 039- 12040- 13 069-15 111-31 115-31 174-33 185-35 249-42 290-61 549-91 569-92 590-93 MANUALMANUALMANUALMANUALMANUALMANUALMANUALMANUALMANUALMANUALMANUALMANUAL•'•-CKS T .1 > f <C- . r I . , account no. inv01-414201-414201-414201-414201-414201-414201-414201-414201-414272- 414273- 414274- 4142-039-12-040-13-069-15-111-31-115-31-174-33-185-35-249-42-290-61-549-91-569-92-590-93CONST8 ^ WR CONS F FUND FUNDRATING FO 09-30-92 PAGE 3 • p.O. • MESSAGEMANUALMANUALMANUALMANUALMANUALMANUALMANUALMANUALMANUALMANUALMANUALMANUAL• A i •••-CKS* I-.*'; <4 1992 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE CHECK REGISTER H « * A • i 300074 300074 300074 300074 300074 300074 300074 300074 300074 3000/4 10/20/92 10/20/32 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 AMOUNT30000410/20/92 1.398 93 1.398.9330001410/20/92 104 6930001410/20/92 36.3030001410/20/92 595.00735.9930001610/20/92 34.757.2934.757.2930001810/20/92 1.246.05 1.246.05300C2710/20/92 167.0030002710/20/92 94.0030002710/20/92 1.'81.0030002710/20/92 167.0030002710/20/92 219.0030002710/20/92 31.0030002710/20/92 73 0030002710/20/92 178.7530002710/20/92 63.002.173.75• H « t • H 300042 10/20/92 70.00 70.00 S2 1.41S 112 697 1.208 8.857 900 529 839 144 4.756 00 20 14 .53 63 02 39 35 85 84 .95 VENDORAIRSIGNAL INCALL STAR ELECTRIC ALL STAR ELECTRIC ALL STAR ELECTRICALLIED MECHANICALAMERICAN SPEEDY PRTGAPPLEAPPLEAPPLEAPPLEAPPLEAPPLEAPPLEAPPLEAPPLEVALLEYVALLEYVALLEYVALLEYVALLEYVALLEYVALLEYVALLEYVALLEYAGENCYAGENCYAGENCYAGENCYAGENCYAGENCYAGENCYAGENCYAGENCY ASPLUND COFFEE BONESTROO BONCSTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ITEM DESCRIPTION MAIN! PAGERSREPAIR REPAIR LS89 INSTALL PARK LITEPW BDG-MECHANICALNEWSLETTERINS AGENT INS AGENT INS AGENT INS AGENT INS AGENT INS AGENT INS AGENT INS AGENT INS AGENT OFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOF RECORDRECORDRECORDRECORDRECORDRECORDRECORDRECORDRECORD COFFEE OCB RD ESMNT-AUG OCM RD TR AUG Sf T^CP AUG ENG '“ONSULST AUG LE#F ST ENG ESMNT/INSP AUG ENG CONST WTR TWR INSP WTR TWR AUG LS89 INSP AUG LSi9 ENG AUG ACCOUNT NO, INV 01-4342-129-31 10-26-92 PAGE 1 i P.O. 8 MESSAGE01-4343-099-1773- 4344-569-9274- 4343-590-9325-4520-484-0001-4900-299-7201-437901-437901-437901-437901-437901-437972- 437973- 437974- 4379 039-12069-15129-31174-33249-42290-61549-91569-92590-93 01-4382-129-31 4305 4?-4306 4306 4:6-4305 26-4305 26-4306 72-4305 72- 4306 73- 4531 73-4531 249-42 359-00 486-00 408-00 408-00 408-00 438-86 438-86 569-92 569-92 ***-CKS•••-CKS^••-CKS•••-CKS•••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS 300085 10/20/92 4 33 BUDGET PRINTING COPIES 01-4210-129-31 :} m 1982 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE 300111 300130 300142 300145 300145 300150 300150 300178 300199 300199 • « * • ^ « 300248 300278 300278 lU/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 300274 10/20/92 • 10/20/92 10/20/92 AMOUNT 4 33 * 10.00 10.00 * 312.81 312.81 * 218.33 218.33 * 5.00 17.20 22.20 * 44.30 42.90 87.20 • 144.00 144.00 » 15.08 5.840.00 5,855.08 • 13,492.80 13,492.80 ‘ 10,197.90 10,197.90 • 102.00 153.00 255.00 • CHECK REGISTERVENDOR '•''ESWICK/QARY COLONIAL LIFE INS CO COPY DUP PR INC CORNICK/JAMES CORNICK/JAMES CULLIGAN CULLIGAN D0RADU3 CORP ROLF E ERICKSON ROLF E ERICKSON GEPHARDT ELECTRIC GRESSER INC GOPHER STATE ONECALL GOPHER STATE ONECALL ITEM DESCRIPTION MTG INS MAINT GAS MTG WTR SOFTNER WTR SOFTNER MAINT SIRENS SUPPLIES NOV FEE PW BDG-ELECTRIC PUB WKS BLDG SEPT FEE SEPT FEE 10-26-92 PAGE 2 ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. 8 MESSAGE 01-4356-129-31 01-4152-129-31 01-4210-129-31 01-4220-129-31 01-4356-129-31 01-4343-099-17 74-4343-590-93 01-4342-175-34 01-4210-059-14 01-4307-059-14 25-4520-484-00 25-4520-484-00 72- 4306-549-91 73- 4306-569-92 •••-CKS '■**-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •■■-CKS •■•-CKS • • •-CKS y m n 1992 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 10-26-92 PAGE 3CHECK NO . DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV.1 P.O. 1 MESSAGE•••-CKS30028210/20/92 29 98 29.98 •HANSING/CAROL UNIFORM 01-4221-129-31ft ft ft ?i A t ••**-CKS 300295 300295 300295 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 25.45 96.92 50.00 172.37 • HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED .lENNEPIN CO-OP SEED SUPPLIES GRASS SEED GRASS SEED 01-4231-29G-61 01-4233-249-42 72-4234-569-92 •••-CKS 300303 10/20/92 413.06 413.06 * HENN CTY FIN DIV ROOM/BOARD AUG 01-4358-080-16 * ft * A ft *•••-CKS 300308 10/20/92 100 39 100.39 • HENN CTY SHERIFF DPT REPAIR 01-4342-129-31 •••-CKS 300317 10/20/92 294 25 294 25 • HIGHWAY 55 RENTAL RENTAL 74-4331-590-93 •**-CKS 300334 300334 10/20/92 10/20/92 25.98 56.95 82.93 • INNOVATIVE MICROGRAP INNOVATIVE MICROGRAP COPIES MICROFILM 01-3500-000-00 01-4306-174-33 •••-CKS 300370 10/20/92 39.78 39 78 • JIM HATCH SALES CO PARTS 01-4232-249-42 ft ft ft ft ft ft •••-CKS 300396 300396 10/20/92 10/20/92 7.443 00 9,260,22 18.703.22 • KRAUS ANDERSON CONST KRAUS ANDERSON CONST CONST MGR-SEPT REIM EXP-SEPT 25-4306-480-00 25-4399-480-00 •••-CKS 300405 300405 300405 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 594 .90 1.953.00 1.698.30 4.246.20 * LA FORCE HARDWARE LA FORCE HARDWARE LA FORCE HARDWARE CITY HALL DOOR FRAME POLICE DOOR FRAMES PW BDG-DOOR FRAMES 25-4520-480-00 25-4520-483-00 25 -4520-484-00 •••-CKS 300439 10/20/92 3.11 LONG LK FORD TRACTOR PART 01-4232-290-61 18d2 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 10-26-92 PAGE 4CHECK NO DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV.• P.O. «MESSAGE30043910/20/92 5 26 8.37 •LONG LK FORD TRACTOR PATS 72-4232-569-92 »‘*-CKS30044130044130044110/20/9210/20/9210/20/92 80.86 32.32 48.00 161.18 •LONG LAKE TIRE SCRV LONG LAKE TIRE SERV LONG LAKE TIRE SERV REPAIRREPAIRREPAIR 01-4341-249-4201-4342-249-4272-4341-549-91 A A H « • ••••-CKS 300445 10/20/92 16.00 16.00 • LYMAN LUMBER LUMBER 01-4233-249-42 ‘••-CKS 3004S9 10/20/92 272.28 272.28 • MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT PARTS 01-4232-249-42 A A A * M li ••■-CKS 300462 10/20/92 1.260 14 1,260.14 • MARTINS NAVARRE 66 REPAIR 01-4341-129-31 300463 300463 300463 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 2.790.00 2.790.00 3.240.00 8.820 00 • MANNSTEDT & SON INC MANNSTEDT & SON INC M"*NSTEDT & SON INC CITY HALL-MISC STEEL POLICE-MISC STEEL PW BDG-MISC STEEL 25-4520-480-00 25-4520-483-00 25-4520-484-00 •»*-CKS 300467 300467 300467 300467 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 130.80 130.80 502.02 381.81 1,145 43 • MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE NOV INS NOV INS NOV INS NOV INS 01-4151-069-15 01-4151-129-31 01-4151-174-33 01-4151-249-42 **«-CKS 300474 10/20/92 16,291 00 16.291.00 • METRO WASTE NOV FEE 73-1282-000-00 •••-CKS 30C4S0 300480 10/20/92 10/20/92 281 39 208 53 489 92 * MIDWEST ASPHALT MIDWEST ASPHALT ASPHALT ASPHALT 01-4233-249-42 01-4233-249-42 t A A A A A •••-CK.S 30Q527 10/20/92 6,180.00 6.180.00 * MOLIN CONCRETE PROD PRECAST CONC-CC/POL 25-4520-480-00 •••-CKS 1992 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE30054110/20/92 AMOUNT16,182.00 16.182.00 *CHECK REGISTERVENDOR item DESCRIPTIONNATL AUTO SPRINKLER IRE PROTECTION SYST 10-26-92 PAGE 5 ACCOUNT NO. INV. t P.O. i MESSAGE25-4520-484-0030054310/20/92 4,050.00 4,050.00 •MULCAHY INC PW BDG-EIFS/DRYWALL 25-4520-484-00 •••-CKS300546300546 M • ft A ll * 30054S 300548 300548 30054v 300548 300548 300548 300548 300548 300548 300548 300548 10/20/9210/20/92 •••-CKS 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 230.00115.00345.00 • 22 . 19. 2l! 211 . 211. 4. 45. 9 55. 22 . 25 . 227. 95 62 73 23 23 23- 78 62 50 81 31 23 78 • NAAB/THERESANAAB/THERESA NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE C MTG 9/28&10/12 P MTG 10/19 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 01-4306-039-1201-4306-174-33 01-4210 01-4210 01-4231 01-4231 01-4231 01-4231 01-4232 01-4232 72- 4231 73- 4232 73- 4234 74- 4232 040-13 129-31 099-17 290-61 290-61 290-61 099-17 249-42 549-91 569-92 569-92 590-93 * • *-CKS 300562 300562 300562 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 107.38 10.92 169.73 288.03 • NSP NSP NSP UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES 01-4324-248-42 73-4324-569-92 73-4324-569-92 •••-CKS 300567 300567 10/20/92 10/20/92 44.224.00 27.340.00 71.564 00 NORTHSTDE CONSTR INC NORTHSIDE CONSTR INC CITY HALL-CARPENTRY POL BDGCARPENTRY 25-4520-480-00 25-4520-483-00 *s*-CKS 300582 300590 10/20/92 10/20/92 46.76 46.76 • 49.26 49.26 * OMAN/LYLE OTTEN BROS MILEAGE SOD 01-4381-174-33 01-4233-249-42 • • *-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS 1992 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTERCHECK NO . DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV.300597 10/20/92 4.343.93 4.343.93 *PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 9/28-10/11 01-2031-000-00 300599 10/20/92 12.00 12 00 * PERA INS INS 01-4152-129-31 300613 300613 300613 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 360 00 20.00 113.84 493 84 • PERRYS PERRYS PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR TRUCK REPAIR TRUCK REPAIR GATES REPAIR REPAIR 01-4231-290-61 01-4341-129-31 01-4341-249-42 300628 300628 300628 300628 300628 300628 300628 300628 300628 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 1.106.20 138.50 112 00 437 30 155.10 99.50 1.147 80 723.25 723.25 4.642.90 * POPHAM POPHAM POPHAM POPHAM POPHAM POPHAM POPHAM POPHAM POPHAM HAIK & ASSOC HAIK & ASSOC HAIK & ASSOC HAIK A ASSOC HAIK A ASSOC HAIK A ASSOC HAIK A ASSOC HAIK A ASSOC HAIK A ASSOC LEGAL RTAINER-AUG LEGAL CONSULT-AUAG LEGAL CONSULT-AUAQ LEGAL APPLIC-AUG LEGAL CONSULT-AUG LEGAL-CITY HALL LAND LEGAL STUBBS BAY SWR ORONO PLAZA ESMNT ORONO PLAZA ESMNT 01-4301-080-16 01-4303-080-16 01-4303-129-31 01-4303-840-71 24- 4399-455-00 25- 4303-480-00 26- 4303-408-00 72- 4303-436-84 73- 4303-434-82 300038 10/20/92 89.99 89.99 * PRAIRIE OFFSET DOG Lie LETTER 01-4322-039-12 300646 10/20/92 272.411.08 272.411.08 • PROGRESSIVE CONST STUBBS BAY 13 26-4531-408-00 300657 10/20/92 48.39 48.39 • RFQ PET & SUPPLY CO DOG FEED 01-4244-129-31 300661 10/20/92 9 70 9 70 * SCHAR6ER A SONS INC PART 74-4232-590-93 At i «i» « 300675 10/20/92 1.945 35 1.945 35 « ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 01-1260-000-00 81 t t t t t • 30071ft 10/20/92 10.00 DIXIE PETRO-CHEM DEMURRAGE 72-4324-549-91 •»»-CKS • * *-CKS ■••-CKS •••-CKS 1992 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 10-26-92 PAGE 7CHECK NO . DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. InV.1 P.O. 1 MESSAGE10.00 •***-CKS30073310/20/92 19.813 50 19.813 50 •STEININGER CONST CO SITE WORK 16 25-4511-480-00300734 300734 10/20/92 10/20/92 56.469 60 22.518.00 78.987.60 • STEENBURG-WATRUD INC STEENBURG-WATRUD INC CC/POL BLDQ-VENEER PW BLDG-VENEER 25-4520-480-00 25-4520-484-00 •••-CKS 300741 10/20/92 90 00 90.00 • DrH30USKI/JAY BOOTS 01-4221-129-31 *»»-CKS 300752 300752 300752 300752 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 910 58 918.48 318.61 294.45 2.442.12 • SUBURBAN TIRE INC SUBURBAN TIRE INC SUBURBAN TIRE INC SUBURBAN TIRE INC TIRES TIRES TIRES TIRES 01-4341-129-31 01-4341-249-42 72- 4341-549-91 73- 4341-569-92 **»-CKS 300756 10/20/92 34.33 34 33 • STEPHEN SULLIVAN MTG 01-4356-129-31 ••■-CKS 300767 10/20/92 7,965 00 7,965.00 • TECHNICAL SURFACING PW BDG-CONCRETE SEAL * 25-4520-484-00 300768 10/20/92 168.34 168.34 • TELEPHONE SPECIALIST NOV MAINT 01-4340-099-17 M fli IN a • •■••-CKS 300775 300775 10/20/92 10/20/92 537.83 213.00 750.83 • TOWN & COUNTRY TOWN & COUNTRY OCT CLEANING OCT CLEANING 01-4349 093-” 01-4340 •••-CKS 300778 10/20/62 51.62 51.92 • TOLL CO PARTS .•:j2-249-42 •••-CKS 300782 10/20/92 108.63 101.93 * TOMCZYK/MARK CONF EXP 01-4356-129-31 ft ft i i » ••••-CKS 300796 10/20/92 45.95 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM 01-4221-129-31 •> 1992 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 10-26-92 PAGE 8CHECK NO . DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV.# P.O. t MESSAGE30079610/20/92 292 50 338.45 •UNIFORMS UNLIMITED JACKET 01-4221-12‘*-31 A A « * A *•••-CKS 300829 300829 300829 300829 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 10/20/92 16.230.00 20.595.00 23.334.00 2.148.00 62,307 00 * VOHNOUTKA ROOFING VOHNOUTKA ROOFING VOHNOUTKA ROOFING VOHNOUTKA ROOFING COUNCIL HALL-ROOFING CITY HALL-ROOFING POLICE BDG-ROOFING PW BOG-ROOFING 25-4520-481-00 25-4520-482-00 25-4520-483-00 25-4520-484-00 •••-CKS 300835 10/20/92 357.84 357 84 • WARNING LITES OF MN FLASHERS 01-4331-249-42 •••-CKS 300841 300841 10/20/92 10/20/92 506.81 69.23 576.04 * WATERPRO WATERPRO PARTS PART 01-4231-290-61 72-4234-549-91 300842 10/20/92 2.421 23 2.421 23 • WAYZATA-CITY OF 3RD OTR WTR 72-4359-549-91 •••-CKS 300845 10/20/92 30 53 30.53 * WECKMAN STEPHEN MILEAGE 01-4381-174-33 “•-CKS 300866 10/20/92 315 00 315.00 • WIDMER BROS REPAIR 72-4345-549-91 « ft i •) (1 a •••-CKS 300901 10/20/92 213.00 213.00 * LONG ISLAND PROD TRAINING SUPPLIES 01-4241-129-31 300902 10/20/92 230.15 230.15 • MN CTY ATTRNY ASSOC CODE BOOKS 01-4240-129-31 300903 10/20/92 20.00 20.00 • MACA DUES 01-4380-185-35 300904 10/20/92 200.00 200.00 • NO MEMORIAL MEDICAL TRAINING 01-4356-129-31 300905 10/20/92 179.464 SO 179.464 50 • PIT-DES MOINES WTR TOWER 72-4531-438-86 300906 10/20/92 19.60 19.60 * BOYER TRUCK PARTS PARTS 01-4232-249-42 300907 10/20/92 213.89 J P COOKE CO OOQ TAGS 01-4210-039-12 > 10-26-32 PAGEaccount no . INV. • P 0. • MESSAGE 01-4221-12''-312S-4520-481-0025-4520-482-0025-4520-483-0025-4520-484-0001-4331-249-4201-4231-290-6172-4234-549-9172-4359-549-9101-4311-174-33 »*»-CKS*»«-CKS 72-4345-549-91 01-4241-129-31 01-4240-129-31 01-4380-1*5-35 01 4356-129-31 72-4531-438-18 01-4232-249-42 01-4210-039-12 •*»-CKS 1 : ^ ^ i\ 1992 CITY CF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT213.8930090810/20/92 127.80 127.80 •LONG LAKE FORD TRCTR30090910/20/92 2.430.002.430.00 *MN STATE TREASURER30091010/20/92 693.00 693.00 *METRO WASTE30091110/20/92 1,612.50 1,612.50 •AEG ENGINEERS33,235.581,415.20155.10355,478.15304,322.06186,651.8218,920.211,030.08 FUND 01 TOTAL FUND 23 TOTAL FUND 24 TOTAL FUND 25 TOTAL FUND 26 TOTAL FUND 72 TOTAL FUND 73 TOTAL FUND 74 TOTAL901,208.20 total CHECK REGISTERVENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTIONRENTAL SURCHARGE SEPT SAC CHG CONSULT WTR TWR 1 a! »«)-i U #1 &'6=^ i 0 gIn£.C i 4^ Ifilccc COiJiMCIL MEETING OCT 2 6 1992 CiTYOFORONO \ . i MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISRICT NO. 278 HELD ON SEPTEMBER 28, 1992 The regular meeting of the Board of Education of Orono Indpendent School District No. 278 was held on Monday, September 28, 1992. Present: Dave McKown John Maresh Thomas Mich Don Anderson Peg Swanson Neal Lawson James Franklin Martha Van de Ven Peg Swanson requested that the Board consider a resolution regarding the start of the schooj year/calendar. Mr. McKown stated that this item would be considered under Old Business. UPON MOTION by Jim Franklin, seconded by John Maresh, the consent agenda was approved as follows: approved the minutes of the September 14, 1992 regular meeting; approved the appointment of Ethel Maki as a cook at Holy Name School for the 1992-93 school year; approved the continued use of the Comraunity Resource Pool for 1992-93, costs to be shared by the Orono Education Fund and Orono Community Education; approved the bills as covered by vouchers 075433 through 076696 and office checks as covered by vouchers 2430 through 2578. Motion carried. Dr. Mich stated that a meeting had been held earlier in the day with members of the Orono City Council, members of the Orono Planning Commission, and the Board of Education for discussion purposes regarding the proposed ice arena; that the Board of Education also met with the Student Advisory Council from the high school during the dinner hour today; that the Oktoberfest was held last Saturday and it was, once again, most successful; that the open houses at all levels were well attended; that he wanted to congratulate the following students and their parents as these were commended students in the 1993 National Merit Scholarship Program: Jeff M. Faden, Sarah L. Marohn, Stephanie A. Recker, Ann T. Roehl; that Stephanie Recker, Orono High School senior, was awarded the All-Minnesota State Journalist at the Minnesota High School Press Association State Convention; that he was distributing the administrative goals for the 1992-93 school year; that he was distributing the 1992-93 Student Telephone Directory developed by the Parent Communication Network; that he and Hr. Lawson had attended the annual legal conference presented by the Ratwik law firm; that he would be attending the Superintendent's Conference at the beginning of next week; that the purchase agreement for the Ji church property should be concluded within the next couple of weeks. Dr. Mich provided the Board with an update on the long-range planning process. He requested that Board members review the area for which they were responsbile in order to assure that the recommendations and activities that are presently in the draft document are in keeping with the spirit and intentions of the various committees. Dr. Mich stated that he and Mr. Lawson are presently working to determine sources of revenue for each recommendation and their goal is to have a final document, including costs, ready for the next Board meeting be approved as the District's long-range plan. Peg Swanson requested that the Board of Education adopt a resolution to be submitted to the MSBA legislative committee regarding the start of the school year and she provided background information for the Board. BE IT RESOLVED, upon motion by Peg Swanson, seconded by Martha Van de Ven, that the MSBA support the repeal of the law mandating the start of the school year following the Labor Day holiday. Motion carried. UPON MOTION by Jim Franklin, seconded by John Maresh, the Board of Education directed administration to make changes to the existing P.E.R. policy in keeping with the legislative mandate of the 1992 legislature. By way of explanation. Dr. Mich stated that the legislature has made additions to the required P.E.R. policy necessitating a statement that indicates broad representation on the P.E.R. committee and the practice of receiving applications as well as the need to be in conformity with the legislation permitting a review of instructional materials and objection to materials. Motion carried. UPON MOTION by Jim Franklin, seconded by Don Anderson, the Board of Education approved the publication and dissemination of the 1992 Annual Report. Dr. Mich stated that this report is produced annually as required by law. He expressed appreciation to Connie Fladeland and Toni Bergland for their good work on this project. Motion carried. Ms. Connie Fladeland provided the Board with an overview of the North Central Accreditation process that will take place during this school year in the review of general areas of study which occurs every seven years. She explained the general organization of the process stating that the committees are just now in the i initial stages of their self-studies. Ms. Fladeland informed the Board that the visitation will take place in April, 1993. Connie Fladeland reported to the Board on the opening of the school year at the primary school covering such areas as enrollment, staffing, and the theme for this year which is "Set Sail”. Ms. Fladeland stated that the areas of focus of the theme are "Set Sail for Friendship", "Set Sail for the World", and "Set Sail for the Ocean". She expressed appreciation to everyone who has worked so hard to make this theme happen, especially the Orono Education Fund and the Long Lake and Maple Plain Lions Clubs for the funds they have pr /ided for the students at Orono Primary School. UPON MOTION by Jim Franklin, seconded by John Maresh, the meeting was adjourned. Motion carried. ohn Maresh, Clerk -i LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT MEETING AGENDA TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (TRC) Meeting of Oct. 20, 1992. 8:00 A.M.- NOON Norwest Bank Building - Board Room. Mezzanine Floor 900 E. Wayzata Blvd.. Wayzata Please Use West Entrance I. Discussion and Approval of Minutes of 9/22/92 and this Agenda II. Flexibility Requests A.Exce1sior (Withers) B.Deephaven (Koeg1er) C.Victor ia (Thibau1t) D.Minnetonka E.Greenwood (tent.at i ve ) III. Updates A.Mound 1 B.Others IV. Future Actions / Meetings Wf Sil CiT\* t'- r -• •J f : I 0( , 1 5 lOSi; l AKK MINNKTONKA C0NSF:RVATI0N DISTRICT Ml NUTTS TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (TRC) Meeting of S(;pl. 22. 1992. 8:00 AM - Noon Norwest Bank Building - Board Room, Mezzanine Floor 900 E. Wayzata Blvd. , Wayzata (Note: Ed Pick chaired meeting in Jim Uttley's absence.) I. Agenda and Minutes Minutes of 8/25/92 and agenda for this meeting approved. Ed Pick did announce, however, that Deephaven would not be prescnt'.ng its request until the Oct. meeting. II. Flexibility Requests A. Mound (Koegl ' Mark began by distributing copies of a packet containing a page flexibility request memo with 8 pages of supporting appendices (Use Table. Zoning Map). He then gave a brief description of the City's land use history and shoreland situation. Mark also mentioned the City is incorporating the shoreland controls into its existing Zoning Code to cover the whole City, rather than creating a shoreland overlay district (displayed a map showing that about 85% of the City is within shoreland). usesThe City is requesting flexibility in five areas: land lot size, density/PUD, impervious cover, and building height. It is. however more restrictive than the DNR standards in two ways: all water-oriented accessory structures, except decks, are prohibited, and all new construction must meet the setbacks - regardless of the placement of adjacent structures. The City also intends to develop a stormwater management plan. (See the distributed memo for details in each flexibility request area.) Following Mark’s presentation, there was discussion among members on several issues related to the request. Several members expressed uncertainty about what the DNR s position will be regarding stormwater management for new projects which are considered in the interim period until stormwater management plans are developed by individual cities. Several expressed a desire to meet with John Stine, the MCWD, and concerned city officials to resolve the issue. (Ed Pick will relay the request to Stine.) Building height was again discussed. Some members expressed concern about the possiliility of no height limit in commercial areas (DNR regs. do not require). Several ,cel the TRC should promote a limit for all areas on the lake.I Ihe was also considerable discussion about the r<'I ationships of height limits to the economics of development. B. Minnetonka Beacdi (.1. llurr) JoEllen distributed copies of a 9/17/92 letter from her to Ed Kick which outlines three areas (height limit, lock boxes, hardcover limit) for which the City is seeking flexibility. The letter also lists seven areas or standards where the City is more restrictive than the D.NR. She also distributed copies of a map showing land uses within the City. The three flexibility areas were then explained by JoEllen. The City wants a 30 foot height limit, but is more restrictive in its measurement (starts at lowest ground level). Although it does not intend to allow water-oriented accessory structures in general, it would like to use a "lock box" setup similar to Orono' s. Finally, the City’ would like to continue using its 30/o impervious limit, with the justification that the large lots and size of the Lafayette Club's pervious areas keeps the overall average for the City well below the DNR’s 25% limit. Members did not seem to express much concern about the City's request, but there was some questioning of the need for a 30% impervious limit with such large lots. C. Tonka Bay (Scott Richards, NAC) Scott distributed copies of a letter (8/28/92) from Dave Callister. City Administrator, to Ed Pick which transmitted the City’s Flexibility Request .and a copy of Section 17 (Shoreland District) of the Zoning Ordinance, which had already been adopted by the City on 8/25. He also distributed copies of the Zoning Map and the Flexibility Reqnes t. Scott then proceeded to explain briefly some background about the City's shor» land situation and the need for flexibility in several areas to '...protect the shoreland areas and (juality of the water, while allowing controlled development and redevelopment...". Ihe City did an extensive inventory of the existing development (similar to that done for Wayzata). This information has been included in an adopted amt*ndment to the Comprehensive Plan entitled Shoreland Management Plan for Tonka Bay. The data on density, lot coverage, and lot width hav'e been compared with DNR standards and Zoning Ordinance to determine development capacity, areas which require flexibility, and how the City intends to handle each area (See the Flexibility Request sectmns on lot width, impervious surface coverage, .and building height). Members did not express serious comerns about the proposal , tut there was some discussion about gravel and paved i driveways - whether and when Uiey surface. are counted as impervious D. Shorewood (Nielson) Brad distributed a Flexibility Hequest sheet which contains information about the current and proposed status of the City’s controls related to lot size, buliding height, and impervious surface coverage. Brad then went over each of these items. The City will not need lot size flexibility for Minnetonka, but is requesting it for other lakes. Shorewood allows a 3.5 foot height, but measures it from the lowest grade. They also allow increases up to 40 feet .f the lot is at least 30,000 sq.ft, and 5 feet of additional lake setback and 3 feet of additional sideyard setback are provided for each additional foot of height beyond 35 feet. The City proposes to meet the 25% impervious limit for all new residential and commercial development, but is seeking flexibility to allow existing commercial to retain existing coverage, but require stormwater treatment measures for any changes to these properties. Members did not express any significant concerns regarding the proposa1. Since Deephaven was not yet ready. Pick used the lemaining time to update members on several matters. He distributed copies of the latest draft of materials from Spring Park. He also suggeested members should attempt to get the new controls adopted by the Dec. I'J deadline, even if they have not yet received an official DNR approval letter. Ed explained that due to internal DNH procedures, these letters are slow to get out. He did merit ion that he could get a letter approving a City’s flexibility request out much faster, if desired. III. Next Meeting (actually discussed earlier under I.) The meeting will be Oct. 20 in same location and should include flexibility requests from: Excelsior, Deephaven, Victoria. Minnetonka, and perhaps Greenwood. i (Z< M ‘ NAME '7^/h Cl C^/'tdor-A j h*'c^ i Z/ov^/^'^o Ijc^*''* ^ \‘^<^(^<^ vJi^k’^A I in\<V)24- y^o&=iJae- ■ ^tb lOorfh I t^chyx I:: O -e > 1 SV^<ls i:‘ 1 ^ ^7 /^^rs 7^^ j^Cocyiy\^ r :l .1 (REiPf?e.<^Ptrr-/ Md r./Ln-ic:. ^1 n dc^ ^ ^icM^ l(J) rj A/^/7A//f 'i^f Hc<~'^^ y '\\or Q^arz::^ A^ li i/^ Ht</z> f^ICa^ 01^^ c^c cAj>V^ ^a.c^ LHc4 JMq>> ^KCb LAKE MIHNETONKA COHbERVATIOfJ DISTRICT October 14, 1992 TO; FROM: Technical Review Committee Executive Director Gene Strommen SUBJECT: Proposed Shoreland Ordinance Provision Regulating Lakeshore l.ighting BACKGROUND: Concern for lighting originating from lakeshore properties which is visible for a substantial distance across the open navigable water of Lake Minnetonka was identified in the late fall of 1991. LMCD polled the lake cities. Orono, Minnetonka Beach and Hound recognized the value in limiting lakeshore lighting to prevent its intrusion beyond the property Intended for illumination. An effort by LMCD to develop an ordinance as a condition of licensing a dock requiring artificial light was tabled as to limited in its scope to address the problem. A later recommendation was made that the cities incorporate a provision in their Shoreland Ordinance to provide uniform regulation as a land-based activity. A model provision is thus offered for Inclusion in Section 5, Zoning and Water Supply/Sanitary Provision, as follows: 5.9 Lighting of Riparian Parcels, Shoreline and Lake Structures 5.91. The installation and location of lighting from lakeshore land or structures is permitted where a substantial need for safety, security or public need can be demonstrated. Lighting so installed and used is subject to the following conditions. A. Flood or spot lighting shall be shielded or directed so that no direct glare can be seen from the lake beyond the water structures or water craft being Illuminated, nor direct glare BBBn from adjoining rpsldences. D. Low wattage non-glare diffused lighting may be used for ground and dock Illumination. C. Lighting specifications: • tLMCD has engineered lighting specificationa available lor Inclusion in this section per attached copy.] Please advise the LMCD executive director of action your city may be willing to consider to meet this lighting concern. Modifications to this proposed Section 5.9 are asked to be communicated to each of the 14 Lake Minnetonka community administrators. II ^ • w • • 400(^T(OT /-0/V/ ycO^ I I. n -- L - - 'Vf i : .:4h ; roadway i. MOHnONTAlS^<; (303 19^* T>1. FU.-400 Cul0« S|[;“ p *^,1'4 “G53 ,,kt .ocotc r,.sK ,. _ P.rm« ..»y «PPP“'» »« »•"“' PP'PP”'’"'""’ SHiSjma - provide. . coorpl.W »«'««“'.»' .*'™ '°'Sabni2ed"bifd Shield 'p«rmil$lV/or , atarting a'd fo< use r».fu«t - Two door system: tealed opUcal JP;£T,®riew fusing: leveling device Indicator. 6.8 ana ^u «n v SSSiS2 S:!.”rRwu«»y bSoi. ■.«' CATALOG LOGIC Ij, -59-10*7] mmlwn LlPf* Unll-W. Uni-tilUll liouMlnf ' CO • Cw-ta*. door W$nBg9 — MEi/^SS -on--??' 4. >Ai PU. ------------- l.tlQ 1-^ |.?0t 4-240 T04<V4«fl L Pub^f 0 -Mono 1 . 120 |.20« 4.240 4-in I.4A0 ___ LtlcfvlOQ** 4 . lAlLhOf^ 5 . $crt^ I »**' i &oft« o^y _____ a . Mor« b a • w*p» ^ Q A . PC^4 Iwdri^ L»4l»ni 0 • Hi3r« 1 •UL A-|fQ|y>Hl.) 4.240 7 • ;,f77 P^HOI ofi • Mc a 02t . MC tL S.aoo^ Ml. uc ns. 7#i NP5 yia - MC Bt C) rHuiiiiin^ ---- , toM» VOA 2*01*90 fbowM »**a H>» *“ J'S y«9^Se-... ....... ermacdiySvl EPA 1 0u.a HUbIeLL # RLC1>255.7 1.032 035-0 WITH PH0T0C0^m30L, 120 VOLT. 250 WATI'S.......5203.W 400 WAITS.......5206.(W AB( JVE INCLUDE LAMPS HUHHELL pole tt RTA-01 (20 F1‘.)...........5562.00 DELIVERY.....nVEEKS ^o«M sc:» «cv 4.«) GF3NERAL COMPUTATION SHEET project Li6HritJC- SUBJECT CALCUUU'CN SET NO ” kMELlU 'INAL VOID SHEET 0^ JO RbV COMP WY CHK 0 By 0 DATE DAT6 DATE DATE L^MP^PQlg^ LUM)^JAi(le jatf rv9V/-M I> RiLB \ *•• /.SfC. '"5SK- , O^F<^ 4 r^‘yfi* *» -^•■' m I <•0 ^ODfcyyyf (^//^/cpp ro MUeSBLL jypc ^L'^OOJ('asow »py* 27,<?<3<5 ^ poarcii-DLe. et>MS>t>lAi ^ p/g POE (?^ <f A//r//f6 fLWA^/^^^c tiZ/Lc S€ ___ / /d3 -?C7 30 ^0 so OOfr 2S 2,0 0,1 OS •0^3 fjore: . LOA^<gpP SV CO%S:DC/? VOO ^t^• • •n/t Lu>^>''^'^ ee ^i^C -r>^ lX)iK ra> cTe-^ -SC/. ■»' ,-T,.v- .4;r- fAje nf Mni.r -— Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission 443 OAK STREET • EXCELSIOR. MINNESOTA 55331 • (6121474-5539 I . II . Ill . IV. V . VI . VII . LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING TUESDAY, OCTOBER 19, 1992 5:00 P.M. 540 SECOND STREET AGENDA ClT>' C'C'K OCT 1 5 iS9e Call to Order Aporoval of Septeranber 1992 .Minutes Reports a) Officers: Treasurer - l.'f.a >n :b) C } 1. 5e:-temDer 1992 ChecK Register b) Administrator/r-roauction Coordinators c> Triax Cao-evinon Unfinishec Business At Cnannel 0 Uodate b) Report on NATOA Convention Office/Studio Relocation - Final Report New Business a) Report on City Council Approvals of 1993 Budget b) Opening on Commission Executive Committee c> Consideration of Annual Financial Review Instead of Audit for 1992 Matters From The Floor Adjournment J [ LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COM,. .TIONS COMMISSION EXECUTIVE COMMIT'ifc^ MEETING TUESDAY. SEPTEMBER 15, 1992, 5:00 PM ROOM 204, EXCELSIOR COMMUNITY CENTER CALL TO ORDER Vice Chair Olds called the meeting to DIRECTORS PRESENT Jia Olas/Excelsior, Vice Cnair Tim Patcrin/urono. Treasurer Lesley niianes-oeamanj/Ton<a Bay, o Tia Saiacar•Minnetrista, At Large Oennis icanua/D-:^ecnaven, At Larcie oner at 5:00 P.M. OTHERS PRESENT tary Ji3i L'anieis/Acair.istrator Colleen LindsKOoa/Aantin Asst.* Jim Scnindier/Procuction Cccra, Mary Peterson/Asst. Prod. Cooro. Paul Ndcarow/Triax Cnuc/< Slocum/Reaionai Channel 6 II.APPROVAL OF MINUTES Vies asfcec tor ciscussion or August l»j, 1992 meetino. Motion 9.15.92.1 Pattrin motion mevee to atorove tne minutes or tne acprrve t.-.e minutes. Sa-azar seconaec. Motion passed unanioously. III. REPORTS a) Treasurer's Report Pattrin Jescrioeu tinanoial transactions rrr tne mont.'i. Motion 9.15.92.2 Salazar mover t: actnve t.te '.nec.< I'lsoursemei.ts r:r tne pence or o/1/tnrouen a.-51. 92. icanca seccnrec. Motion passed unanimously. Vice Cnair Olds then cnangeo the agenda in the interests Coeaissicners neecing to ..eave early. or ti.me, due some IV. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) Office/Studio Relocation Nazarow gave Olcs ana Oanieis the new suo-lease anr a oid irr constriction that tne Commission wouia nave aone to new location. rie tnen distrioutec tne iioorpian ror tne new stuaio. ne scatec tnat Thursday, Seotemoer .99^ construction can oegin to ouild studio. Triax snould have tne lines activates oy Septenoer 25 or i6, 1992. Salazar as<ea aoout the agreea upon space ana t.te decision to meve the control room from area B-i, on tne rloorplan, to witnin tne stuaio space itself. Daniels stateo t.mat as of Friday i9/ll'92) tne agreement inciucea a_. areas availaole to oe usea as either stuaio space or Commission office space incluaing area B-i. As of Monaay (9/14/92/ area B-i is no longer part of tne stucio access space ana wouia be usea oy Triax for equipment storage. Nazarow stated tnat the current studio is 573 The new stuaio square feet including IS 2So square feet larger the as •<ere. sq. Danieis statea tnat ft..wouia be tnis control room, small office and stuaio. It 18 snown on the rloorplan. Salazar asxed Daniels wnat his measurements accoraing to his measurements, it is approximately 960 losing approximately luu sq. ft. with the pove. Salazar tnen statea that he feels w.,at tne Commission cannot agree to decrease in space. Nazarew tnen asxed if the Commission now needed mor oom. Olds stated that the balance of available space not used by th Commission was to be used for stuaio access and that the reduction in space pianned by Triax was a complete surprise to tne Commission. Nazarow said that Triax nas found that they need additional storage. Olds statea tnat prior to tnis meeting there was no aiscussion regarding Triax Having a •ecureo storage arma at this location. Pattrin asxed if the door to the storage area would te secured by Triax. Nazaroe statea that at this time he was not sure, due to a fire exit witnin area B-I. Pattrin stated he had a problem with technicians accessing equipment through studio. Nazaroe stated that they would gam access through the side door. * LMCCC - September 1992 Meeting Pape Two Salazd reiterated tne shock of just fincung out about tne cnar.ge in floorplans r*nd does not feel comfortable with this layout. He also stateo that his total of measurements of tne current stucio does not equal that wnicn was stated earlier. Nacarow ast-:ed wnere Salazar got nis figures. Salazar anc Stanga statec tnat the figures provideo by Iriax do not adc up. Nazarow then recaiculateo and apologised for nis adainq error and tnat tne current studio is 7Sg sq. ft. according to his figures.in IS Nazarow ilso stated tnat he nad an e.xoert measurements for sound ana aescnetic conditions anc tnat Tna;: approximately 310,000 in this relocation. Salazar asxea Nazarow if negotiations car oe made in rediris to Olds stated that S-i sncull be used by access. Nazarow stated tnat he feels Triax nas concedeo tc tn-=f nigner price to ta^e sc enema area B-i. anc has aiso agreed to suo-lease tne front office space at no profit. Pattrin statec tnat as tnis fioorpian is not tne commission’s original., Triax would now oe itii.izing soace tnat should ze reflected in tne renta- dcsts. Olds asxec for a cl ar me ation. Patti in feels tnat Tna.: s-tcu.c pay a percentage. .nigner /ics if t.-iis matter snoulc ce taoleisaiazar as.-tec tne Executive Committee. Salazar men asitec if the location of \ i'anieis statec contrr- rcom tnat ves, it was mav oe an issue interfere in exzects tne ■.cr..mission tc oav.• « rt. The Donion tne erf ice tnat tne .•aCar ow wouia oe cnai^sion 3C.ana tnat negotiatea from wnca. oefore regaraing opening t.ne stucio. ayaiiacie proaucticn soace. Pattrin asxed Nazarow what rent ne statec tnat Triax would pay for 1,141 sq. 3795 per month. Daniels tnen stated that would actually oe using is approximately amounts were 3700/montn Ccamission and 31,000/montn Triax. Nazarow asKec if it could be reversec as to wno wouic sub-i.ease Olds stated that altnougn that is a valid tnougnt, it is not tne question tne Commission tonignt. Olds tnen statec tnat ne feels tnat accurate measurements are neecec and that he would lixe to see tne studio operable by October 1, 1992. .ne tnen asxed Nazarow if Triax would compromise on the B-i area. Nazarow agrees to listen to any ideas. Ke feels, however, that acoustically the location tne Commission nad thought would be control is not as good as tne location Triax has chosen. The visibility of control is better as well. Olds asKea if B-1 could be divided with Triax for access storage. Nazarow agreed to this. Olds then asked tne Executive Committee that if a portion of B-1 IS usud for access storage would tney approve tne fioorpian and allow st.af£ to negoti.are rental costs. Daniels stated tnat if that shared space holds Triax equipment, would the Commission be liable for anything da.maded or .missing? Notion 9.IS.92.3 fSalazar moved . '.at if naif of area 3-1 is tor access •torage he approves fioorpian. Pattrin seconded. Olds asxed for further discussion. Daniels stated that the agreed upon 3700/month was inclusive of all available space as either access or office. Olds stated that the rent would be tor just tne Commission office. Daniels concurred, however feels that tne original agreement included the understanding of access and Commission usage of tne available space. Salazar imenued tne pending motion to include negotiat.jns between staff and Triax and if start is not satisfied, he witndraws motion. Pattrin concurred. Daniels then suggested S60U/month to Nazarow. Nazarow declined offer. Pattrin stated that he felt the rental costs should be a separate issue. Salazar isked if this fioorpian had to be voted upon tonignt. Olds stated that the sub-lease is what needs to be voted on. 1 LMCCC - September 199S Meeting Paae Three Salasar restated his motion in tnat star: could negotiate, but is willir.g to withdraw his motion if Tria:< is unwilling to negotiate dollar amounts. Nazarow stated that Triax's lease with Jo West begins Octooer 1, and that the pressure to move is on. Olds stated that a large amount of the "last minute' pressure was createo cy Triax. Salazar stated tnat this last minute jockeying snould be expected ano tnat ne 13 not willing to vote for the plan as it stands. Olds asiced if the Executive Committee is willing to meet in a special meeting. Salazar witnaraws Motion 9.15.92.3. .-attnn wipnoraws second. Salazar as<ed Daniels to continue wor.cing with Nazarov m negctiati;t.s ind to scneoule a special meeting of tne Executive Committee to ta<e action. Pattrin as<ed for a clarification of tne exact prcoletn. Olds statec tnat tne prooiem is in tne suo-iease and if it is still valic witn tnese new iimer.sions. Motion 9. 15.92.4 itanga mcvro to approve a special meeting of tne Executive Cosmittae a.nd Iriax to ce set up oy staff. Salazar ceconiec. .Motion passed unanimously. Pattrin asxec wnat tne orioinally acreec upon dollar amount was. .aniels statea tnat s700/montn is wnat is in tne sur-lease. to b) Channel 6 Update: Introduction of New Director Oicj introcuced Chucx Slocum to the Commission. Slocum stated tnat he was aware of tne prcoiems out would li.-:e t: listen the Commission's feelinos on the matter. Olds statea tnat tne Commission is frustrated. Althcugn we are reouire-z to carry Channel 6, because of geograpnical realities we are still unable to receive an acceptaoie signal, rie nopes to nave t.nis z.ninged, .nowever, t.ne so-uticns brougnt forth so far may incur a possible increase in rates for suoscrioers. Rather than do this, the Commission feeis tnat a aiscontinuation cr service may re then only option. He tnen asxed Slocum if he had any otner possible solutions. olocum as<ed Nazarow wnat resolutions Triax hao come investigation of this situation. Nazarow statea tnat rerouting tne line was solution, r.owever tne cost involved is approximately 322,000 wnicn would tnen be passed on to the subscribers. He also stated tnat Triax current! bring in tne signal. Slocum suggested using Paragon instead of King. Olds asxed be the same thing only thru Paragon instead. Nazarow offered to have his plant manager, Tom Wi.mler, contact Slocuo. Slocum accepted tnat offer anc stated that ne is very serious in wanting this issue cleared up. He feels that technology ana funoing are the main obstacles, nowever, their resources are very limited. Daniels stated he would oe happy to host a meeting with Tr:ax, Siocus, himself and possibly Paraoon. ulds stated he feeis thot Cnannei b is worth getting out to subscric«rs and hopes a viable solution is reached. Slocum hopes for tne same and will be oringing it up to his board and will relate the Comoission's seriousness regaroing tnis issue. to wit n z neir line vraj one would tnen be pays King to if It wouldn't V. REPORTS Continued s) Triax Report Nazarow distributed billing inserts from tne Ccaaission tnat were sent at Triax'j expense. Ke then distributed tne programming summary and the subscription report for August 1992: Hoses Passed 11,910 Basic Sub# f LMCCC - Septemoer 19'?2 i1e<eting Page Four Expanded Basic Subs Total Pay Units Total A/O's Total Remotes 6,181 3,729 4,281 2,223 Nasarow stated tnat tne new Digital Cable Radio is being sold by Triax using a soft sell method. Ke then saio that Triax has a baox^og or installations ana that there may be some misunderstandings regarding next day installation. Oics asked if anyone had made complaints. Daniels said that there has been a few, however ne has ;iusc explained the situation to them. b) Adaini3trator*3 Report Daniels stated tnat nothing else majo* required Commission approval anc in the interests of time, the Aaministrator's .Report snould be tabled to tne meetina. that next c) Produotion Report ocnindler distnouted tne monthly production report VI. ) NEW BUSINESS Report on City Councils Approval of 1993 Budget Daniels stated that tne 1993 Budget nas been presented to six city dounoils and ail have passed it unanimously. b) Report on 1992 NATOA Conference Olds Stated ne felt it was an exceptionally good conference ana would like to make a more detailed report at anotner time. VII. HATTERS FROM THE FLOOR Olds asKed for matters from the floor. VIII. ADJOURNHENT The meeting was temporarily closed at 6:24 p..m. and will continue wnen staff can consult legal counsel and reconvene at tne convenience of all 1 LMCCC - Septemcer 2:?9J Meeting Page Five CONTINUATION OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992, 5:00 PM ROOM 204, EXCELSIOR COMMUNITY CENTER Chair Brancel called the meeting back to order at 5:04 p.m. DIRECTORS PRESENT Barb Brancel/Shcrewooo, Chair Jim 01i3/E:<cel3icr, Vice Chair Tim Pattrin/Orono, Treasurer Lesley Hucnes-Beamana/TonKa Bay, 3'tary Tim Salazar/Minnetriata, At Large OTHERS PRESENT Jim uanieia.'Ac..ii:ii5trat>:r Colleen Lincs<cog/ncmin Asst. Mary Peteraon/Asat. Proc. Ccori. Paul Nazarow'Triax Items tnaLanieis Jistricutec a list of Creignton, feels sr.iu^i oe added to tne suo-lease agreement as Daniels tnen oointej out some errors in tne suo-lease itself: Pace •jcmmission s a:t:rr.-57, icm clarifications. :ne, taracraoh as aooitiona. suo-sections rent ar.'i eit of any e refer to neces3arv aocve “4 snculi rear "...tne iuctenant snail pay increases in operating exoenses...* Page tnree, Section i3, cotn snculi oe Section li. Nazarcw as<ec ii item on trie _ist frcm tne attcrney is West may have a crrolem witn it due to city oriinances. Olds ccncurreo witn Nazarow anc sfteo ne doesn't zee. it is necessary in the sub-lease agreement. Daniels ac.cnowleogeu tnis poi.nt, out exp,.aineo tnat Creionton felt it snould oe orouont uo for discussion as prttectitn for tne Commission. Nazarow stated ne has spoxen to Paul riucer, owner of tne neignooring funeral home, and ne statea ne nas no prooiem if so.T.e of his spaces are uti-icrd oy the Commission upon occasion. Daniels then gave a orief reaainc or tne rest then stated tnat witn tnese eignt additions, Section 12 of would then oecome iection 20. Daniels stated tnat, with these additions feels corofortaoie witn tne Commission signing tne suo-lease witn 'rria:<. Brancel asceo Nazarow wnen and wny tne cnanges in the flcorpian discussed on Septemoer 15, 1992 toox place. Nazarow said ne felt tnat tnere were really no or tne items :n tne the oridinai _ist. .ne suc-lease and/or correcticns, Creiznton cnanges and tnat .ne die not realize tnat tne Commission tnougnt ai.» t.ne remaining the a stated srudio Triax wouldl used space available would be used for studio access. Brancel stated that Triax using a portion of tne space for storage was not part of the verbal agreement tnat was negotiated witn staff. Brancel also sne felt sometnina was lost by tne Commission with the reduction of space. Nazarow stated ne felt that if tne Commission needs tnat space, sub-lease it at additional cost. Salazar stated ne feels that the entire space of area B-1 snould studio, as that was what was originally agreed upon. brancel said sne feels that the studio nas been cneated from the original agreement. Nazarow disagreed, in that tne new studio will be larger tnan the current one. brancel stated that with as many years as tne studio has been squeezed into tne same location, witnout complaint to Triax, the sire being enlarged snould not be considered a great concession on the part of Triax. Salazar stated that the issue is not tne increase of space, it is the detauit of Triax from tne original versa! agreement. Brancel asxed Nazarow what he feels will remedy tnis situaticn. .Nazarow stated Item *16. Salazar stated ne feels item *lo isnared access space) is net acceptable in light of the fact that Daniels had reached a veroai agreeient witn Nazarow tnat included all of area B*1 as studio access space. LMCCC - September 1992 Meeting Page Six Nasarow stated that Trxax has been acvised by an independent fira not to place the control room in area B-1 because of iacx of visibility from inside and bad acoustics. oalicar stated he feels that the question is wnether to acceot item »16 (snareo access space) in the sub-lease aqreement or if tne original vernal agreement shoula sta.nd. Pattrin asKed if there would be windows in tne control room. Nazarow said yes there would. Olds stated tnat after looiong at tne floorpian, r.e can uncerstand the argument against placing control in area B-1. Brancel as<ed if the new control wcuiJ re larger than the curre.nt me. Nazarow said it would. Brancel t.hen stated sne would oe willing to <eeo ite.m vsnareo access spacer in tne sub-lease. Sne die suggest to .Nazarow, nowever, that tne line mentioned go east to west. Pattrin stated that the security of Tria.x’s ecuiroent is a ma;or worr-' and feels tnat a cag** sr.oulo be put up witnin area B-i. Brancel stateo tnat tne security of stucic equipment is gust as important. oaiazar asKec if Nazarow can commit Iriax to tne list of additions as well as the changes set fortn at tnis time and if so can a mctim oe mace and a vote taken. Nazarow stated tnat if item < utilized tar-cino scaces< is .?trio.<en, as discussed earlier, and the numoering of the new items reflect tnis, ne agrees to tne rest or tne adaituns and cnanges set lortn by loa Oreignton arc tne Commission. Motion 9.22.92.1 Salazar movec to accept tne suo-*ease acree.tent * with item »13 of the attacned list deleted) snowing the location and the fioorplan of the new studio. Pattrin seconced. Motion passed unanimously. Motion 9^.22.92.2 Pattrin moved to approve Chair Brancel and Nice C.nair Olds to sign tne official suo-lease agreement. Salazar seconcec. Motion passed unanimously. Motion 9.22.92.3 dies moved to aojourn. .muc.nes-Seanans seccncea. Motion passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 5:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Administrative Assistant /cl A A f y > fw I fiM^ 11 m T in- 3 >*• fi" 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. PROSPECTIVE ADDITIONAL SUB-LEASE LANGUAGE Subtenant shall have the option, upon thirty days written notice from the landlord, to cure any default hereunder of the Sublandlord. Subtenant shall be allowed to utilize eight of the parking spaces provided in Section 29 of the lease. Sublandlord shall orovide at no expense to the Subtenant, an exterior sign approved by the Subtenant and Landlord. Such approval shall not be unreasonablv withheld. In addition to Section 5 of the Lease, Landlord understands and hereby consents to the use and occupancy of the Premises for general cable television studio/editing facilities available to the general public under the supervision of the Subtenant. Subtenant shall have unrestricted access to and use of one half of the space designated on Eichibit B by the circled "282.2 Sc. Ft.", for the purpose of Subtenant's storage. Said Subtenant's storage space shall be clearly designated by a painted yellow stripe on the floor. Infringement upon said Subtenant's storage space by the Sublandlord shall be considered a violation of this Sublease. All heating and air conditioning of the Premises# outside of Ordinary Business Hours, as defined in the Lease shall be the sole responsibility of the Sublandlord. The insurance requirements of Section 18 of the Lease shall be the sole responsibility of Subiandlord, naming Subtenant as an additional insured. Subtenant's obligation aind exposure pursuant to Section 27 of the Lease, shall be limited to Subtenant's obligations under this Sublease. jatm A METROPOLITAN COUNCIL «< uf» I’iirk Ccmre. 230 till Fijili 5m-o. Si. P-iiil. US 331011633 612 201 6.130 M.V 612 20163.30 77T 612 2010m ' 0 C:TVC-..lin Date:Oct. 9, 1992 . 9 * f To;Metropolitan Council Members Front:Mary Anderson, Council Chair OCT 1 5 l09i: Streamline public services Metro 2015 outreach effort ends Central cities plan to cut CO, FRIDAY REPORT Judging from our regional breakfast in Shoreview yesterday, Ramsey County officials are very interested in exploring strategies for intergovernmental cooperation to streamline public services. Officials made a number of points, including: 1) providing rewards to entice units to cooperate isn’t a good idea, because the reward should be the benefits gained by cooperative actiorv. If a project isn’t feasible and can’t stand on its own, it should not be put together just to get a reward. 2) Removing barriers is more important than offering rewards. There has to be a mutual benefit for cooperative projects to work; they can’t be win-lose situations. .1) Intergovernmental teamwork will lead to trust. 4) Consolidations don’t necessarily lead to cost-savings; metro areas with more units of government may spend less money because they compete. 5) We should examine barriers in funding program guidelines. For example, programs that limit funds to operating rather than capital costs may prevent units from getting a cooperative project off the ground. Council Members Dede Wolfson and Jim Senden attended the breakfast-our last for this year. On Monday I spoke to the Regional Transit Board, my last scheduled presentation on our Metro 2015 project. The next day. Council Member Jim Krautkremer addressed the Minneapolis Downtown Kiwanis Club on the project. His talk marked the last scheduled presentation the Council has given on the project, our S.^rd since we began the outreach efton this summer. On Tuesday I attended a dinner in St. Paul on the Urban CO. Project. It held as part of an international meeting the group is holding in the Twin Cities this week. 1 had the opportunity to meet people from regional councils in Helsinki. Toronto and Portland. The meeting dealt with how each of the 12 participating cities around the world are developing carbon dioxide-reduction plans and programs for their areas. Hosting the meeting were Minneapolis Mayor Don Fraser. Minneapolis Council Member Carol Johnson and St. Paul Council .Member Bob Long. A steering committee has drafted some CO.- rcduction plans for Minneapolis and St. Paul councils to adopt, including recommendations to retrofit buildings for energy etficiency, and changes in transportation and transit. I indicated that once the isvo central cities adopt plans, we could help spread the word of those changes to other cities in the region. Good response to issues paper Breaking the cycle of poverty Our Chair’s Advisory Commiitee responded positively to our issues paper for the Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework on Wednesday. Comprehensive Planning Manager Anne Hurlburt presented the paper. The committee raised concerns as to how we frame the issues, and which may be more important than others. There was also a concern that we clearly identify the relationship between our vision and goals document and the issues paper and MDIF. We explained that the vision document is not static but is designed to change in meeting new conditions in the region and the world. We said that after we complete the MDIF, we will change our vision document as needed. The committee said they wanted a status report on the region at their next meeting, with a focus on poverty and relationships between the central cities and suburbs. Obviously, the committee is showing strong interest in our revision of the MDIF. Also at the meeting, legislative liaison Janey Gohl reviewed issues we are considering for the next legislative session. The East Metro Women’s Council held a ground-breaking ceremony Oct. 1 near Lakewood Community College in White Bear Lake for a transitional housing project designed for 20 single-parent households. Our Metro HRA is playing an instrumental role by providing Section 8 rental assistance certificates. The project, with 10 three-bedroom units and 10 two-bedroom units, also will provide a variety of supportive services. The East Metro Women’s Council’s goal is to break the cycle of poverty for families with low incomes. - I.-* .1 «r -f ? ■■ t s • ^ * r f I«» «» • «9 • LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRIC CITY 0= OBONC October 15, 1992 OCT 1 ® Mayors and Administrators Lake Minnetonka Municipalities — FROM:Chair Dave Cochran ••• ^ SUBJECT: Multiple Dock License Fee Review Status • •<***% • We advised you just prior to our September 23 Board meeting of questions raised by a group of multiple dock users concerning current and projected multiple dock license fees for 1993. The Board addressed this issue at its Board meeting with an attorney representing the multiple dock user group. ^ Considering the group's concerns, and upon an analysis of LMCD's co»}:3 of administering multiple dock related activities, the Board agreed that the scheduled 1993 Increase from $12 to $15 per watercraft storage unit (WSU) would be readdressed. Some Board members felt that more time was needed to achieve a full understanding of the cost and revenue projections before arriving at a specific revised WSU rate; The*issue"Was tabled back - to the—Water-Structures———- Committee. The October 10 Water Structures Committee considered a proposal Introduced by Treasurer Scott Carlson. It specified an $11 per WSU fee for 1993. The proposal, which is recommended by the committee for Board consideration October 26, is attached. I • f \ .t’ H LMCD attorney Charlie LeFevere, Holmes & Graven, provided the board hie opinion on how the fee program is being administered. A copy of this opinion is enclosed for your advice. The multiple dock users were also provided this opinion prior to the Water Structures Committee meeting. •1^ This issue will again be addressed at the October 28 Board meeting. The LMCD Board invites your comment and questions as it prepares to consider action for the 1993 licensing program, including an adjustment to the fee schedule. Thank you for taking the time to become fully familiar with this issue. Enclosures: lO/l LeFevere letcer 10/9 CoiisniCtee prupoSJl LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT October 9, 1992 To:Water Structures Committee From: Scott Carlson, Treasurer Subj: Multiple Dock License Fee Review PROPOSED RECOMMENDATIONS i .Decrease the multiple dock license fee for 1993 to $50 + $11/WSU 2.Adopt a modified 1993 LMCD Budget reflecting a decrease in projected revenue from license fees as follows: Line 2 Reserve Fund Allocation Original Revised $ 15,732 $ 35,732 Line 4 Total License and Permit Fees $145,000 $125,000 3.Implement appropriate accounting procedures through the use of computerized accounting software to allow more detailed tracking of expenses. 4.Regarding future increases, implement according to the following policy: a. Multiple dock license fees shall not exceed the allowable limits as determined through cost tracking. b. Recommend a fee policy that regardless ftf allowable increases as determined by "a.” above, annual increases shall be held to no more than $1/WSU. 5.Establish a committee to include multiple dock owners and operators to discuss future license fees. 6 .Continue to work for alternative revenue sources per the adopted Lake Minnetonka Management Plan. Lake Minnetonka Conservation district REVIEW OF LHCD LICENSING/PERMIT FEES COMPARED WITH EXPENSES/BUDGETS FOR MULTIPLE DOCK RELATED ACTIVITIES (MDRA) 1992 Preliminary Estimates Projected Fees with Revenue (MDRA) Actual through 7/31/92 -.St & addtl collections 1992 Total Fees Prioj rcco wj.uu j to Change Adopted Change Actual 1992 $108,985 5,564 $87,135 $105,044 $114,549 Expenses Estimated (MDRA) Personnel Contractual Services Office & Administrative Capital Outlay ^ Legal Services (Civ^l) Consulting Services Contingency Total $ 69,862 9,016 13,656 1,150 16,200 6,270 6,612 $122,766 1990 Comparison Total License Fee Revenue MORA Expenses - Estimated Comparisons Budget Actual $ 80,000 $ 76,338 141,987 128,248 Expenses $122,766 937. Total Budget $398,230 31Z ,338 vs MDRA Expenses $128,248 59% Total Budget $405,540 32% 1. Totals reflect the findings of the October 1991 report of the lee co^ittee which were adopted. The adopted budget for 1992 of $85,000 was established in June 1991. c kt c 2. Expenses, except as noted, are allocated to MDRA at a rate of 57.54 ot totals, based on analysis of Executive Director and Administrative Technician activities. 3. Legal costs are allocated to MDRA at 90X of Legal Services exc us ve o Prosecution, and do not reflect any potential litigation costs. 4. Consulting allocated at 1/3 of Lake Use Density Study, Public Information Study, and Public Access Study. .... , 5. Low percentage of MDRA revenue to expenses reflects municipal subsldlzition of licensing activities. 9-21-92 1 lift. Aftornf|f at taw ROiERT A. ALSOP R onald If. Batty STEPHEN J. Bl/Stx John B. D ean Maryg . D orrins STCFANIC N. Ga LEY CORRINE A. HEINE James S. IIoiaies D avid J. Kennedy JOHN R. Larson Welungton H. Law Charles L. LeFevere IlOLMKS & GRAVKN CilAHrtULLi 470 rilUhurj Onler. Minnripnli«. MInnoota 5^402 (612) 337 9J00 Facsimile (612) 337-9310 HSITFR S DIRECT DUL 337-9215 jiiiiN M I KFrvtr. JR. KORERI J. LINDALL Lai r ^ K. .MOLLET Barra RA L. Porthood James M. Stro .mmen James J. Thomson , jr . Larrv M. wertiifjm B«)NNir L. WD.KINS Gary P. Wi.nter D avid L. graven (i92a-iaao or COfNSEL R orert C. Carlson R urert L. D avidson October 1, 1992 Gene Strommen Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 900 E. Wayzata Blvd., Suite 160 Wayzata, MN 55391-1836 RE: Multiple Dock License Fees Dear Gene: A number of multiple and commercial dock license holders, represented by Mr. James Gilbert, have asserted that the Ucense fees charged by the District for multiple and commercial docks are unlawful for a number of reasons. The purpose of this letter is to address some of the issues raised by Mr. Gilbert. The authority to assess license fees under the police power is subject to cert^n limitations. The principal limitation at issue here is that the fees levied under the police power may not be so high as to become a general revenue measure unless the municipality has the power to tax, and the fee is levied under that taxing power. The LMCD does not have the authority to tax. Therefore, it may not l®vy a tax as a means of raising general revenues merely by calling ii a license fee. Such fees may only be assessed in an amount which is reasonably needed to pay the costs of issuing the license and regulating the activity being licensed. This basic proposition is well estabUshed in the law of Minnesota and other states. See eg. Minnesota v. Northern .acewav Corp. (Minn. Ct. App. 1986) 381 N.W.2nd 526; ^nneapolis Street :jo. V. City of Minneapolis (Minn. 1952) 52 N.W.2nd 120. I am generally m agreement with Mr. Gilbert's comments in this regard. We part views, however, on the legaUty of the fees charged by the LMCD for multiple dock Ucenses. Since the Board has so far heard only the views of Mr. Gilbert, I thought it would be helpfu to offer my perspective on these issues. First, the Board should understand that fees levied by the Board are presumed to be valid, and the burden of proving fees to be illegal is on the person challenging the fees. Lyons v. City of Minneapolis (Minn. 1954) 63 N.W.2nd 585. CU.42290 LKUO-4 Mr. Gene Strommen October 1» 1992 Page 2 As a matter of evidence, ^Central point here is that the staff has made about the defensibihty of the fees. .^Pdevoted to the regulation of a good faith effort to deternune how m expenses of the District are incurred multiple docks, and of the credible evidence of which I am aware as a result of such regulation. AH °fjf®^that evidence for a number of reasons, bufr‘have letn%Vesemod wUhV evidence that the staffs determination is erroneous. Mr. Gilbert questions the detailed time defending the fees to have such detailedchallenge to the fees. It would be helpfu m detenamg tne ^e kept, and in records. However, there is no legal requirem . . ... . ^ records of this rhXnge S/. ‘"^e.TlS'abULe of ^detailed time records is a greater problem for the challengers than for the District. Mr. Gilbert also relies on the projected for the future are substantia y argument is that no revenues from multiple dock licei^e fe . . hudo-eted amount for fee revenues and connection has been established between the budgeted amoun^^^ budgeted r^f^^lfuili^J^^Veefcould^bU Slower®leveUhL the expenses incurred if the The District could even charge no fees for . j cronter amounts inway prevent the District from charging and collecting fees in gioaicr an attempt to recover some of these expenses. I am not aware that any past budgets were baaed on a detailed exa^ cost of regulating multiple docks , ‘T:;!’.feinated reve^^^^^^^ actuallybudgets were more than mere projections of anticipatea the budget based on a bona fide effort to determine the “‘ual cos, o regjt» would not nrevent the District from increasing the fees if it were laier ui upoi reevriuation, that the fees were inadequate to cover expenses. Mr. Gilbert also points to the amount of the Distrmfs ^“:^,f"uUipl^^^ the District is recovering more than it : -feured from other As the Board has been advised, the reserve .. .j g jq millfoil control sources, including voluntary publ.c com efforts and to the Save the Lake Fund. ^ . ir thr» nistrict’s onlyrevenues from its st'tutoiy assessments against member cities. ”urce of revenues were multiple dock license fees and it had built up a B CLL42290 LRUO-4 to be concernedtxxscs jne madeis that the i^tion of»voted to tl incurred lence ot otrcaso"®.’^r^lrVraoUinaUon .. because it "°essW i«e»‘ basis for a detailed he fees to ba in ,uch records tWs pality to beep germination ict wrong in d wish to 3cbs is on t j is a greater lime records is 6 rDislvi«^\J;»tvpensem *tuen^ tW ,sr.ss“ ■»“• ■" . let ailed e a^^ihat past j be estabhsU^^^^ actually revenues an budget ,cr exp®"*®*- j «att evidence that iserve fun _,.\tipie doebs. \ regulating from other Mr. Gene Strommen October 1, 1992 Page 3reserve fund, one could infer “j®‘CrererneTZ^t ’ ‘'ituenrt/th® t®- based on the fact that the District has a substantial reserve fund. Mr. Gilbert asserts that his clients ^ouW seeb to recover which would not only alleeJdly ihegal. Under Minnesota law, a s."" ™r-rs^. Mr. Gilbert points out that the percentage of by fees has increased over the ^^^ears and a^sserts^ tnai^ established that the unlawful. This would evidence of illega y , g the maximum fees, as a function of the P®"®®"'®^® fam aware of no evidence that s;r.r.rr4.=ir.;s'ts ?ir."XfX«, ...i.«y. Finally, Mr. Gilbenargues that the j to levy such fees for boats but does not authorize the legislature in Whether the District has such powers is a ^ ^ ,be District the authority to enacting the District's enabhng ®®V„H ™imen™cf of docks and aioorings. The regulate construction, installation an nower to reeulate implies the power court has recognized in °^ber contexts that th p £Ulation. MinneapoUs to license and to collect fees therefor to c .q.q-i 40 m w 2nd 353. The District street Railway Co. v ■ City of Mi""®®P°‘f 1° ' if i In Pi—has no has collected fees for licenses for many y iqvpI acceotable to Mr. Gilbert's £:5x»"x;»".vri, I should point out also that the Districtan unlawful charged with ®°®®®®P°"‘‘i"f/?P:;;f"V,lv view if Us purpose as a tax by the court unless it is ma^e y 10041 on N W 361. Moreover, the regulation", rity of Mankato v. Fowle_r (Minn 1884) ^ f fee "may courts have said that it is not ° necessary to reimburse the incidentally yield some ^ Minnpanolis Street Railway Co_^ [rnunicipamyl 1949^ 40 N.W.2d »t 3.S9: Lyons v. V. City of Minneapolis, ^ (Minn-^ 1 ^ of Mankato v. Fow]er (supra). In the v.'g.v o? Lneapoili (Minn. 19..uTWN.W. 428, the court CU.42290 lKllO-4 f Mr. Gene Strommen October 1, 1992 Page 4exceeded the costs incurred for se here. Therefore I see no reason sed on the fact that the District has Bring a legal challenge to the fees jly f but would also seek to recover fedly illegal. Under Minnesota law, t*e unlawful, the challengers are not teapolis Brewing Co. v. Village of lillan, Section 26.91. s total operating budget supported serts that the fees are therefore y if it could be established that the )tal budget, were at the meucioium er, I am aware of no evidence that ct may not increase the percentage iple docks as long as the amount of :*egulation of the licensed activity. g legislation authorizes the District :e the collection of fees for docks. ‘ of the intent of the legislature in ;ives the District the authority to nco of docks and moorings. The ower to regulate implies the power le cost of regulation. Minneapolis 949) 40 N.W.2nd 353. The District this basis. If the District has no i level acceptable to Mr. Gilbert’s on would be required to explicitly n of the opinion that a court would the i.Tiplied powers of the District. ired to justify every penny of fees p will not be adjudged an unlawful nable in view of its purpose as a 584) 20 N.W. 361. Moreover, the hat the amount of the fee ’’may K>unt necessary’ to reimburse the ' Minneapolis Street Railway Co. d 353 at 359; Lyons v/ City of innkatov. Fowler (supra). In the 1940) 290 N.W. 428, the court suggested that a party challenging such fees would have to demonstrate that receipts would exceed the municipality's costs "continuously and by a substantial amount. years, and there is no legal reason why the Board may not continue to do so. If you have any further questions about any of these matters, ple.'.^se feel free to give me a call. Very truly yours. Charles L. LeFevrare '^LL:ckr Hfc.lh.IVtD OCT 21992 l-.wJ.CJJ. (Cti42290 tJtiiO-4 • ' e i l\ f (f I- •/ Vl Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Tot in Lake Minnetonka Sun/Sailor for Excelsior, Minnetonka Wayzata, and Westonka editions From; Eugene R. Strommen Executive Director 473-7033 Date: October 7, 1992 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE LMCD ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE PROHIBITING USE OF NON-ENCASED STYROFOAM IN DOCKS The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District will hold a public hearing at Tonka Bay City Hall, 4901 Manitou Rd Tonka Bay, 7 pm Wed, October 28, 1992 regarding the District's intention to adopt an ordinance prohibiting the use of non-encased styrofoam as a dock flotation device. Eugene R. Strommen, Executive Director Lake Minnetonka Conservation District i Lake Minnetonka Conservation DistrictTot Lake Minnetonka Sun/Sailor for Excelsior, Minnetonka Wayzata, and Westonka editions From: Eugene R. Strommen Executive Director A73-7033Date: October 7, 1992 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE LMCD ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE PROHIBITING USE OF NON-ENCASED STYROFOAM IN DOCKS The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District will hold a public hearing at Tonka Bay City Hall, 4901 Manitou Rd Tonka Bay, 7 pm Wed, October 28, 1992 regarding the District's intention to adopt an ordinance prohibiting the use of non-encased styrofoam as a dock flotation device. Eugene R. Stronnnen, Executive Director Lake Minnetonka Conservation District To I * \ Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Lake Minnetonka Sun/Sailor for Excelsior, Minnetonka Wayzata, and Westonka editions From: Eugene R. Strommen Executive Director 473-7033 Date: October 7, 1992 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE DR GLEN NELSON NEW MULTIPLE DOCK LICENSE The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District will hold a public hearing at Tonka Bay City Hall, 4901 Manitou Rd Tonka Bay, 7 pm Wed, October 28, 1992 in the matter of a new multiple dock license application from Dr. Glen Nelson for nine boat storage units on a combined dock with two adjacent properties at 500 Tonkawa Road on Stubbs Bay, City of Orono Eugene R. Strommen, Executive Director Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Lake Minnetonka Conservation District To* Lake Minnetonka Sun/Sallor for Excelsior, Minnetonka Wayzata, and Westonka editions From: Eugene R. Strommen Executive Director A73-7033 Date: October 7, 1992 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE DR GLEN NELSON NEW MULTIPLE DOCK LICENSE The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District will hold a public hearing at Tonka Bay City Hall, 4901 Manltou Rd Tonka Bay, 7 pm Wed, October 28, 1992 in the matter of a new multiple dock license application from Dr. Glen Nelson for nine boat storage units on a combined dock with two adjacent properties at 500 Tonkawa Road on Stubbs Bay, City of Orono. Eugene R. Strommen, Executive Director Lake Minnetonka Conservation District k- To:Ron Moorse, City Administrator From:John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director Date:October 19, 1992 Subject: Western Hennepin County Pioneers Association Display Recently Mr. Jim Roehl of the Western Hennepin County Pioneers Association (Long Lake Museum) stated that the members of the museum wanted to prepare a display of the history of Orono. The display would be approximately 24" x 30" and would be in the shape of a picture frame that can be placed on a wall at the new facility. The display would include a map of Orono from 1889. They hope to have the display ready for the opening of the new Council Chambers in December of this year. Isv License No. 92-06 CITY of ORON SOLICITORS LICENSE Sale Dates: Friday 12-1:30 p.m. 11/27, 12/11, 1/8, 2/5, 3/5 & 4/2 License Expires _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (60 Days After Council Approval) NAME OF ORGANIZATION Sun Ripe Citrus Co. NAME OF SOLICITOR_ _ _ _Dennis H. , Jiolet Dorene & Joel D. Froehlich ADDRESS OF ORGANIZATION _ _ _ _Sun Ripe Citrus 312 Cora Street, Johnson Creek WI 53038 PHONE NUMBER OF ORGANIZATION TYPE OF SOLICITATION: Contribution (414)699-2197 - Business Type of Product Citrus Fruit at Navarre Lanes, 3425 Shoreline Drive N / ■• . •*.-vrVi:: •• License No. ^~^^ CITYaf ORON SOLICITORS LICENSE Date Issued October 14, 1992 License Expires 10 Sundays (60 Days After Council Approval) MAYOR L. H, Haug October 19, 1992 4901 Manitcu Road. Tonka Bay. Minnesota 55331 ?f''CiTYOf ORON: ■JdLSii^a: ,/ii- COUNCIL Ralph Bendjtbar Steven Johnson Oougias Keiier John Senescail Ron Moorse City Administrator Box 66 Crystal Bay ADMINISTRATOR Orono, Minnesota 55323 David Caiiister Dear Ron: Tel. 474-7994 On September 25, 1992, representatives from seven lake area communities met to discuss concerns and frustrations with the mticipated increase in rates from the Metropolitan Waste tontrol Commission. As a follow up, we have scheduled a meeting for Friday, October 30th at 7:45 p.m. at the Tonka Bay City Hall, 4901 Manitou Road. I have invited MWCC officials to attend the meeting to answer our questions and they have indicated that they will be in attendance. The main purpose of this meeting will be to again discuss common concerns that our cities have in dealing with the MWCC, particularly in the areas of inflow and infiltration and the type of sewage flow data used to formulate charges to each municipality. This meeting should provide us with an opportunity to question MWCC on their increased costs for 1993 and also update each other on our own situations. Please notify the appropriate staff person and your elected officials of this meeting. Please contact my office (474- 7994) as to who will be attending from your City. Hope to see you on the 30th. Sincerely, CITY OF TONKA BAY Dave Canister City Administrator i •I * * i? 1 i 1. 2. 3. 4 . 5. 6. t • LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICJ LAKE USE AND RECREATION COMMITTEE AGENDA Monday, October 19, 1992, 4:30 PM Norwest Bank Building / .0 £. Wayzata Blvd, Room 135 (Elevator access for Handicapped; use west entrance on Wayzata Blvd.) Quiet Wrters Area in Halsted's Bay cove near .ing’s Point Access; Public Hearing Report and findings SpecialEvents A. New Event: Excelsior Park Tavern, Excelsior Winter Fest, Excelsior Bay, Excelsior, January 14-24, 1992. B.Discussion on possibility of Water Patrol being responsible agency for issuing Special Event licenses C.Revi*»w of stipulations governing start (ease-off) and cond‘*i'_ for open water fishing tournaments D.Deposit Refunds 0 $100 each 1) Don Shelby US Invitational Bass Tournament, Sept.10-13, 1992 2) Morrison Wedding Fireworks, Sept. 26, 1992 Joint and Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County for Sheriff’s Water Patrol services - contract renewal discussion with Water Patrol officials PoMt & Water Safety Education Program update Subcommittee on Decibel Levels; meeting date scheduled for 3:00 PM. Monday, 10/26/92. (information only) Water Patrol Report A. Monthly Activity Report Additional business G I • %c c :f \ • 1 I ' *—• I H r — OCT 1 I f Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Mci 's I'ark Centre. 230 East Filth Street, St. Paul. Minnex«>ta 55101 1633 612 222-8423 I-C Date:October 6, 1992 OCT 1 3 To:ALL CITY MANA6SRS 0 Subject: 1993 SAC RATES is to in. irn you that the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has found it necessary to increase the Sewer Service Availability Charge (SAC) rate by $50 to $750, effective January 1, 1993 (Resolution Number 92-178). The SAC rate for the communities that do not have interceptor sewers (those shared by two or more communities) was increased by $65 to $625, also effective January 1, 1993. These communities are Chaska, Cottage Grove, Hastings and Stillwater. SAC is collected by your community as users connect to the Metropolitan Disposal System or as a user's potential or peak sewage discharge increases. The SAC funds collected pay for the debt incurred to expand and improve sewer facilities. These facilities provide the sewer collection and treatment service stipulated for your comiTiunity in the Metropolitan Council's comprehensive sewer plan. Please note: All SAC fees collected by the comaunity in 1993 are to be remitted to the Commission at the 1993 rate regardless of when the permitting process began. The rate to be charged iar the rate in effect at the time of payment. If you have any questions, please contact Teri Keegan at 229-2196 or Sandra Selby at 229-2118. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Gordon O. Voss Chief Administrator GOV:SLS:kme CTYMGRS.SLS cc:Building Inspections Department s. Selby, Mwee D. Bluhm, MViCC T. Keegan, MWCC Equ31 Oppcftunity/Aflifm#* V# Acf*on Empioyef