Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-28-1992 Council PacketH1NUTE8 OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 2S. 1992 ROLL Th« Council m«t on th« abovo data with the foMovilng members present: Mayor Barbara Peterson, Counci(members J. Diann Qoetten, Qabriel Jabbour, Edward Callahan and Mary Butler. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, Public Works Director John Qerhardson, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, Chief of Police Stephen Sullivan, City Attorney Thomas Barrett, City Engineer Glenn Cook and City Recorder Terl Naab. Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. (•1) LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 1993 SUOGET Jim Daniels and Tim Pattrin were present. Pattrin explained he was on the budget planning coeseittee and that committee has submitted the 1993 budget proposal. To date, 6 of 10 communities that have reviewed the proposal have approved it. Butler questioned the 1>u1get amounts for conferences and postage. Daniels explained that the 1992 and 1993 funding for operations is simitar. He noted the Coewnssion started a newsletter in 1992 which had not been budgeted for and id included in the 1993 postage amount. He added, another major change is coverage of 10-12 City Council meetings per month. Me explained that the Commission has a contingency fund to activate the program. Me stated another change is the assessmenc of sales tax. Pattrin stated the proposed budget is comparabte with adiscent Ctwani SB ions. Mayor Peterson asked if the additional aouioment i^utd ensure better reception for local progrmning. Pattrin stated he could only speak for the production and of the cable casting procasa. which would ba improvad. Jabbour suggaated broadcasting the '.MCO maetinge. as *t la important for reel dent a to understand how tna LMCO funct'one. Pan ala notad the Coonietion <»et not heve stiff to cover such meetings, which would heve to be covered by treined personnel. Denieis thenked the Council for tneir tupoort by adoption of e resolution supporting legisietion putting control of cable T¥ bech in the hands of the loco* cable commissions. 1 r H1NUTE8 OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL NEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 28, 1992 LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMISSION - CONT. Pattrin axplainad that tha vidao industry changas vary quickly and tharafora It Is Important to kaap aPraast of thosa changas by attending confarancas. It MSS moved by Jabbour, sacondad by But Iar, to support tha Cable Commission’s 1993 proposed budget. Ayes 5. nays 0. (•2) CONSENT AGENDA Butler added Hemj #8 and 9 to tha Consent Agenda. Mayor Paterson removed Items §3 and 4. It Mas moved by Jabbour. sacondad by Goat ten, to approve tha Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 5, nays 0. Motions for all Items adopted by consent agenda will be included In the minutes In their respective numerical order. (•3 8 4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mayor Peterson referred to tha minutes of the August 18th meeting. She asked In Paragraph 3, Swanson be added after -ama Peg. She referred to the minutes of the September I4th and asked that on Page 13 tha percentage of Ir-craise be addod to tha motions adopting tha 1993 budget. It was moved by Mayor Peterson, sacondad by Jabbour. to approve the minutes of tha special meeting of the Council held on August 18, 1992 as amended. Ayes 9, nays 0. It was aw^ved by Butler, sacondad by Callahan, tu approve the minutes of the regular Council meeting of September 14, 1992 «s amended. Ayes 5, nays 0. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Jo€11 an Murr reported at the LMCO'a meeting on Vadnasday, 4 public hearing was held regarding the Pheasant Lawn Homeowers Association for a multiple docs iicense. She stated the Lake Minnetonka Access Task force will meet on October 21st at 7:30. Fees charged by the LMCO will be reviewed on October 10th, 7:30 a.m. A public hearing regarding styrofoam docks will be held on October 28th, 7:00 o.m, the noted the lmco is considering adoption of Orono's ordinance in kind. She reported training for persons check mg water Quality will be held at Lord Fletchere on October loth at t0:00 a.m. uulibi HINUTES OF THE PEGULAR OROHO COUNCIL HEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 28, 1992 (#5) MAXWELL BAY ACCESS UPDATE Marg« Gasch recortad that tha DNR purchasas a parcal of rasidantatly us?.' property on MaxMall Bay, and tha Legislatura passad a gram ior money to ba used for davaiopmant of a public accats. She reported several lakashora residents mat with tha DNR to express their concerns. JoEllan Hurr referred to the packet of information submitted. She explained Plan C, which provides for possible future expansion to the east, is the preferred plan among the concerned residents. She suggested this be a joint venture between the City and the ONR to ensure that the City Is a part of the project and can control tne use of the access. Tne ONR will consider payment in iieu of tSAes. She felt access from Tonkawa Road opposed to County Road 91 was a plus. Gordon Kimball, Regional Trails and Waterways Supervisor, introduced Stan Lindahl, landscape architect for the project, and Brad Thompson. Kimball noted the property designs address the concerns of the iakeshore property owners. He asked that Council refer the ONR to the appropriate reviewing body for further consideration. Jabbour acknowledged that the ONR has gone out of its way to address issues of concern. He asked that the DNR consider putting In writing that they will not revisit Orono again until all other cwnmunitles have been reviewed for additional parking and access. Kimball stated this proposal will put the ONR in the range they had hoped for parking needs. Jabbour suggested if putting this coimitment in writing is not acceptabie. the ONR consider making each zone have the same number of parking spacos available. Me stated because Orono had the foresight to provide open land for public use, they should not be made to pay the consequences. Lindahl resiawed the proposals. Ha noted it was decided that three ramps for loading and unloading was needed. Plan C provides for 50 to SO car/trailer parking spaces, and 19 car only spaces. Plan 0 provides for further setbacks from the Laxe and the street, and there would be additional car/traUer parking spaces. Msyoi' Peterson asked about picnic tables at the site. 3 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 28, 1992 MAXWELL BAY ACCESS - CONT. Lindahl stated their main focus is for access facilities and shoreline fishing. The ONR felt they should not provide picnic tables. Jabbour understood the DNR is trying to substitute current areas on the Lake where people shore fish, with more appropriate fishing locations. Murr noted a consensus among property owners that Plans C and D are an improvement over what Is currently at the corner of Tonkawa Road and County Road 51. Qoetten asked Qasch to provide the City with a summary of Items discussed at the meetings with the DNR. Cailahani reiterated that the citizens favor Plan C, and asked the ONR’s intention with regard to the different proposals. Kimball stated the DNR realizes the benefits, particularly with Plan 0, that allows the ONR to meat ail their goals. The DNR currently does not have a preference to ar^ plan. Jabbour noted the issue of adding density to the bay. He suggested the DNR project the sites to their maximum capacity to enable the City and the ONR to review maximuoi density on Maxwell Bay. Lindahl noted the DNR has provided lighting at the site and citizens have asked that a telephone be provided. Goat ten asked about hours of operation. Lindahl reported the DNR does require the access to be aval I able e minlmom number of hours per day, but otherwise it would depend on whether it were a joint venture. Qoetten asked if the access would be open year round. Kimball stated they do not do anything to keep the access open in the winter, however, they do not lock people out etther. Mark Brenemen. Msneqer of North Shore Drive Marina, stated it ie not safe to go out on the ice at this location at any time. Butch Loomis, Assistant Chief of the Long Like Fire Department, •uggested dry hydrants be provided on the site. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 28, 1992 MAXWELL BAY ACCESS - CONT. Qtrhardton notad sawar savars tha proparty boundaries, and the City will wish to protect and maintain these lines. Mayor Peterson stated the next step would be a review by the Planning Commission. Moorse suggested the DNR submit a sketch plan review. Debbia Branaman asked If tha DNR would disallow shore fishing under area bridges in lieu of the fishing pier proposed. She suggested tha DNR discuss this option with tha County. Kimball noted If the DNR Is able to purchase tha commercial I y zoned property to the west of tha parcel they currently own, they would ab/^ndon plans for the parcel they own. Qoatten felt Plan D was too ambitious for the property. Butler felt the additional setbacks were a plus with Plan 0. Norm Paurus, 2500 Casco Point Road, asked about taking this aignifleant amount of property off the tax rolls of the City. Mayor Peterson called for a recess from 3:16 to 8:20 p.m. PUBLIC O ENT8 Rich Klamen, 1212 BriarStreet, requested the Council consider snow plowing in front of his property. He stated the road is platted on City maps as a public street and sewer runs underneath the road. Gerhardson stated this portion of Briar Street has always been perceived as a private road. He asked that staff be given a chance to review this end other simitar situations. Mayor Peterson noted a past owner did designate the roadway as private. Kiemen felt they were dealing with words tike perceived. He noted the street is platted as public on the C*ty maps. Mayor Peterson stated the issue would be on the agenda for the October I2th meeting. S MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 28, 1992 PUBLIC COMMENTS - CONT. Butch Loomis, Assistant Fire Chief for Long Lake, commended the Orono Police Department and the reserves for a great job at the emergency preparedness excercise. Loomis, Chair of the Fund Raising Committee for the Fourth Grade, thanked Mayor Peterson and Stephen Sullivan for participating in the fund raising events at Octoberfest. («#e) #1748 ROBERT I RITA HOVLANO, 1246 NORTH ARM DRIVE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3182 It was moved by Jabdour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution •3182 for Application #1748, Robert and Rita Hovland, ^ 5 North Arm Drive, for a conditional use permit to permit the ins.aifatlon of an accessory structure on a through lot and a variance to the required setback. A/es 5, nays C. (#7) #1760 CHARLES A SHIRLEY PYLE, 3648 IVY PLACE - VARIANCES > RESOLUTION #3183 Charles and Shirley Pyle and Daryl Hanson were present. Gaffron explained the changes the applicants have made to the proposal since the ias^ meeting. Goetten asked about history of the property. Gaffron noted that while the Inspectors had the impression the driveway had been expanded some years ago, there are no specific records of the additional hardcover being added to the property. Mrs. Pyle stated that what exists on the property now was there when they purchased the property 6 years ago. Jabbour felt they are taking a bad attuation and trying to get It close to good. Goetten felt they did Improve the proposal fro® the last meeting. Callahan atated the applicants have made a definite effort with regards to this proposal. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 28. 1992 ZONING FILE 91750 - CONT. It was mo’<ad by Callahan, saconded by Butlar, to adopt Resolution •3183 for Application #1750 for Charles and Shirley Pyle. 3548 Ivy Place, for variances to construct an addition to the existing residence. Mrs. Pyle asked that Condition #3 be amended to allow the existing garage to remain until the new garage is oullt. Callahan agreed to amend his motion to amend the Resolution, Condition *3, to allow the hardcover in the 75-250’ zone to remain until Just prior to the final inspection or the Certificate of Occupancy, if appropriate for this property. Butler seconded the amendment. Vote: Ayes 5, nays 0. Motion carried. (••8) *1783 IKX)DHILL COUNTRY CLUB. 200 «K)OONILL ROAO - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION *3184 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Qoetten, to adopt Resolution •3184 for Application •1763, Woodhiil Country Club, 200 Woodhi11 Road, to grant a conditional use permit for land alterations. Ayes 5, nays 0. MAYOR/COUMCIL REPORT Jabbour suggested the City Administrator send a letter to the Little League informing them that the School Board Is ready and willing to deal with them. He stated the President of the Little League expres.»ed interest at the last Park Commission meeting of pursuing bali fields in Maple Plain. Butler suggested writing the letter In terms that say, "your nmm came up at a joint meeting between the City Council and the School Board, and It seems that you are out of the loop of some of the current information. Please contact the School Board for an update. ** HINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL HEETINQ HELD SEPTEMBER 28, 1992 ENGINEER'S REPORT (*#9) PAY REQUEST 98 - HIGHWAY 12 FRONTAGE ROAD - SEWER, WATER A STREET IMPROVEMENTS It MAS fflOVAd by Jabbour, sacondtd by Qoattan, to authoriza Pay Raquaat 98 for High^^ay 12 frontage road to B & D Underground Inc. In the amount of $28,018.07. Ayes 5, nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (910) CITY FACILITIES UPDATE John Davies and Irv Oahlstrom from Kraus-Anderson and Jack Boarman were present. Davies reported that the Council will be able to hold their December meeting at the new facilities. He referred to an updated construction schedule. He reviewed the Orono budget update which Indicates a negative contingency. Jabbour asked they had moved $100,000 from the furniture fund to the contingency fund, thereby making the negative contingency fund $287,748. Boarman explained that they Intend to use any existing furniture they can In the new facilities. He reminded them that the Council chose to add 8,000 s.f. of mezzanine above the Council Chambers for future use and a generator, which has Increased the cost of the fad 1 ity. Jabbour felt there are Items that appear without the knowledge of the Council that perhaps should be revisited. Daviee said everything that has been done was In the original design package. Butler asked about the kennel roof that Is reoueited to be deferred. Davies explained It Is a garbage/recyciing center and a kennel, which was on the original drawings. Sullivan clarified the kennel is not for the canine, but rather a holding cell for dogs apprehended. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 28, 1992 CITY FACILITIES UPDATE - CONT. Boarman explained 75X of the area is for garbage and recycling. The roof over the structure will actually reduce the amount of maintenance. He stated most communities have an ordinance requiring garbage to be contained within a structure. Jabbour suggested they revisit the garbage area and the dentils and columns for Public Works. Boarman reiterated that he suggested removing the columns at the beginning of the oroject. He stated other communities have chosen not to roof their garbage area and that has not been a p'‘obtem. Jabbour asked about the Jail facility. Boarman explained the Jail is a 4 hour holding cell. He added if they added the interview room and adv ed a day roo«r./lunch area, it could be considered a 72 hour holding cell. He noted the security card access is required by the State, and the camera system, to be deferred. Is the State-of-the-art for police facilities. Qoetten asked If there was anything they should be doing now to facilitate the future installation of the camera system. Boarman said they system. are installing the conduit and wiring for the Jabbour suggested removing the "remaining contingency" and "total" from the bottom of the budget update as he felt It very misleading. Boarman stated he has recommended a $190,000 contingency, comparable with other projects this size. He added some items have been put on hold to allow the Council the ability to not get ahead of the funding process. He stated the Council has opted to add quality Improvements to the project in spending the contingency funds. Qoetten suggested structure. a chain link kennel in lieu of the blocked Butler asked if the contractors are back to working full days. Davies reported some problems with sub-contractors, but reported they ere back on track now. He noted they are reccknmending the award of the bid for the salt storage building, and are recommending deferral of the cold storage building. Jabbour asked about the gas storage 9 > HINUTE8 OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 28, 1992 CITY FACILITIES UPDATE - CONT. Moors# #xplaln#d that th# dt-wataring costa war# not inciudad in th# bid. Boarman axplained that thay sent out datailad specifications, but tha contractors igno^ad the issua of da-wataring. Tha bids war# rajactad. Tha bids war# rasubmittad but tha vendor mislead tha City as to what that bid i.icludad. Ha stated until they find a way to feasibly gat rid of the water, they will not go any further with this portion of tha prcjact. Jabbour fait they may not even need tha gas tanks. Garhardson noted there are times whan tha City needs quick access to fuel and stations :ira not open. He fait this item is important to keep in tha project. Callahan asked about other anticipated expenses prior to completion of tha project. Boarman explained that ha recommends preserving between $32,000 to $50,000 for final unknowns dealing with tha project. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to defer all items listed on the Orono Budget Update from tha Dentils down. Ayes S, nays 0. Callahan stated the Council wants control over ail changes. Davies Indicated they have not dona anything without approval. Boarman raportad since they contingency, every cost item will approval. (•II) LONG LAKE FIRE CONTRACT working with a negative be brought to the Council for Moors# explained both tha Long Lake and Orono Councils have approved a one year contract based on the initiat proposal by Long Lake, however, the final contract has not been submitted to the City for execution. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve a one year agreement for fire protection with the city of Long Lake • t a cost of $76,193.00 and to authoriie the Mayor and City Administrator to sign a contract reflecting this agreesMnt. Ayes 4, nays i. Butler voted nay. Notion carried. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 28, 1992 (•12) POLICE SERVICE CONTRACT - CITY OF LONG LAKE Moors* *xplalnect Long Lake Is concerned with language related to supplemental officers and the responsIbI I Ity for extraordI nary costs after termination of those officers. He stated since the contract is only for one year, Long Lake is not locked >nto an amount of supplemental officers for coming years and the issue has resolved Itself. Jabbour felt the City of Orono should not agree to a contract unless the City gets what it requires. He asked about recourse if the contract is not renewed. He indicated It would not hurt his feelings at all of the contract is not renewed. Moorse explained Long Lake wants the option to reduce the number of supplemental officers mid-year based on cuts of State aid. Jabbour stated if the City would need to lay-off officers due to this cut, the City of Long Lake would need to pay for the costs Incurred. Sullivan stated It may be merely a matter of reassigning hours. Moorse felt it was better to agree with 2 supplemental officers at the beginning of the contract as Orono has those officer* already hired, and mid-year, If deemed appropriate, allow them to reduce that number. Jabbour suggested they allow a parcentaga of hours to ba reduced opposed to a full off tear. Sullivan stated Long Lake has asked that this issue be negotiated in good faith if deemed necessary. Moorse fait It may be appropriate to determine a percentage amount that could be reduced by the City of Long Lake and still not negatively affect the department. (•13) DONALD (8IQNBERQ*8 STUBBS BAY 8EWER ASSESSMENT APPEAL Moors* explained Mr. Qronberg is before the® regarding hi* assessment for sewer. Butter indicated by submitting a counter proposal. Mr. Qronberg is taking a step in the right direction. She noted Council should discuss the merits of this request in executive session. i i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEM^Er 28, 1992 GRONBERG’S ASSESSMENT APPEAL - CONT. Moorse explained there Is some disagreement about bulldabllity of the lot If sewer is not provided. He stated If the lot Is buildable without sewer, the assessment should be lowered. Qaffron Indicated the bulldabllity is based on the amount of a variance the Council is willinq grant for this property. Gronberg reviewed the ,s,uas and ' jighborlng properties. He noted he cannot sign a permanent easeme.tt for the sewer project until a building permit Is Issued for the property. Mayor Peterson stated the Council would discuss this issue In executive session and report back to Mr. Gronberg the next day. (•14) BID AWARD FOR SALT S SAND STORAGE BUILDING It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to award the bid for the salt and sand sturage building to J. a F. Construction In the amount of $36,409.00. Ayes 5, nays 0. (•IS) ESTABLISHMENT OF A WORK SESSION TO REVIEW THE 1993 PROPOSED BUDGET A work session to review the 1993 prop *sed budget was established for Thursday, October b, 1992 et 3:00 p.m. (•Id) CITY MALL a PUBLIC WORKS BUILDINGS - PAYMENT MO. 7 It wee moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Jabbour, to approve City Hell and Public works Buildings Architect's Appiicetion and Cert I fleet# for Payment No. 7 es presented. Ayee 5, neye 0. (•IT) REQUEST FOR PAYMENT - BOARMAN i ASSOCIATES It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Jabbour, to aoorov* payment to Boarmen Aseocletee for arch ItectureI services for the month of July, 1992 in the amount of $23.979.00. Ayes 9. neys 0. (••IS) APPOINT ELECTION JUDGES FOR NOVEMBER 3RO GENERAL ELECTION • RESOLUTION #3189 It wis moved by Jabbour, seconded Dr Ooetten, to adopt Reeo»ution #3189 eppoiniing election judges for Qenerei flection to be held November I. 1992. Ayes 9. nirt 0. 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 28, 1992 (*•19) FEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - TOPOGRAPHIC COPY CHARGE BRUSH FEE - ORDINANCE #109, SECOND SERIES It wa» moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Ordinance •109, Second Series, amending Ordinance #99, Second Series, entitled "1992 Fee Schedule". Ayes 5, nays 0. (*•20) PERFORMANCE REVIEW & SALARY ADJUSTMENT - SCOTT OSERAINGER tt was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to increase Scott Oberainger’s to Level 5, Step III effective October 22, 1992. Ayes S, nays 0. (*•21) LICENSES !t was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve tne follow‘ng I I censes: Septic System Install* License: Ouickway Excavatir.g one Day Set-up Permit: Minnetonka Center for the Arts - Holiday House Ayes 5, nays C. (••22) bills *t was moved by Jabbour, seconded by ^etten, to epprove payment ' the All Funds Account. Ayes S, nays 0. ADJOUK-etENT Hayof P».r«rson adjourned the regular Orono City Council aMeting at 10:33 o.m. to Executive Session. Ayes S, nays 0. ATTIST: Barbara Peterson, Meycr J. Dtarr Oo«tt«*n, / r intj Mayor orotby Th- He M »n, City Clerk m « *•• •* W -• - •• V« '>-« W*« » w ^ PUBLIC ATTEMDANC: CITY OF OI^ONO MEETir^C BATE f PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFOW-LATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. .N’A.'dE (please print)ADDRESS NA.ME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (fron agenda) I. IlillLjCL V 1 ^ 2 . /a ^ ! i 2. A ’/'j!-I'j (Xiui'lui.iJ 4. J//)^ 5.t<PO V^Ai4i- ^11*- c •« V I'r 40 ~ ~ yio ( c Jt 1 f 4 6.”^1 !vx /^ 7 0 £ 15. 16.— 17. 20, /JCh‘ ----------------------- 9 • a . ^ ^ k 1 J J 1 0 >n H' 1 »l , o iu’v>».t A-1 '^-,7*p------------! 17/it A i t/ ♦ ^ - A/^ ^ S " ' tA . - jfe!---------------- U. /./i i ' 4v-wLt_______k.__ r u.r^UA' P2i p -»(• (£> AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 1992, 7:00 P.M (*) Asterisk items ate considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon request. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be ^tained upon request from the Recorder. S S ROLL CALL 1. 7:00 P.M. Lake Minnetonka Cable Communicat 19^^3 budget - Jim Daniels 2. CONSENT AGENDA* APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 3. Special Meeting of August 18, 1992 * 4. Regular Meeting of September 14, 1992 LAffR MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT - JoEllen Hurt: Representative S. Maxwell Bay Access Update - JoEllen Hurt, Marge Gasch h Bev Bloomberg PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Linit 5 Minutea Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT • •APPLICANTS** Iffiiliodlately after the Council has revieved your application please sign the three (3) original resolutions at the Recorder's desk. Applicants need not execute resolutions for subdivisions, vacations and denials. * 6. #1749 Robert k Rita Ho viand, 1245 North Atm Drive - Conditional Use Permit/V .riance 7. #1750 Charles fc Shirley Pyle, 3548 Ivy Place - Variances - Resolution 8. #1763 Woodhlll Country Club, 200 Woodhill Road, Conditional Use Permit • Resolution HAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT ENGINEER REPORT 9. Pay Request 16 Highway 12 Frontage Road - Sewer, Water and Street Inproveawnts CITY ADMIHISTRATOH'S REPORT 10. City Pacillttes Update 11. Long Lake Ftre Contract 12. Police Service Contract - City of Long Lake 13. Donald Gronberg's Stubbs Bay Sewer Asseasaent Appeal 14. Bid Awaid For Salt and Sand Storage Building 15. Catab 1 i ahnent of a Work Session to Review the *93 Proposed Budget AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 1992, 7:00 P.H CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPOi'T Continued 16. City Hall and PuL ’ c Works Buildings Application and Certiticate of Paymei. No. 7 Kraus-Anderson Construction Co. Gephart Electric Braun Intertec Atnerect Inc. Allied Mechanical Mannstedt Steel Northside Construction National Automatic Sprinkler Request for Payment - Boarman and Associates Appoint Election Judges for November 3rd General Election - Resolution Fee Ordinance Amendment - Topographic Copy Charge - Brush Fee Performance Review and Salary Adjustment •• Scott Oberaingner 17. 18. 19. 2P. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT LICENSES (20*) BILLS (21*) ADJOURNMENT INFORMATION ITEMS INCLUDED IN COUNCIL PACKET OPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS (?9/25 Hazardous Waste Collection 9 a.Ri. — 3 p.m. 09/26 - Hazardous Waste Collection 9 a.m. - 3 p.m. 09/28 - Work Session Council, Planninq Commission and Orono School Represenatatives Re: Proposed Ice Arena/Multi- Use Recreation Facility - Room 107L Education Link - 4 p 09/28 - Council Meeting 7 p.m. 10/06 - Park Commission 7 p.m. 10/12 - Council Meeting 7 p.m. 10/14 - Lake Use Committee 7:45 a.m. 10/14 - Dedication of Kelley Parkway 4 p.m. 10/17 - Fill Clean Up Day 10/19 - Planninq Commission 7 p.m. 10/26 - Council Meeting 7 p.m. J •S'fp TO: PROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Mootse, City Administrator X September 22, 1992 SUBJECT: joint Work Session With the School District Concerning the Ice Arena Proposal A joint work session involving the City Council, Planning Commission representatives and School District representatives has been scheduled for 4:00 p.m. on Monday, September 28th in Room 107L of the Education Link Building. The purpose of the work session is to discuss the proposed ice arena/multi-use recreation facility planned to be located on Highway 6 between Willow and Old Crystal Bay Road. • */ TO; FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator^/^/^ September 22, 1992 SUBJECT: Cable Commission 1993 Proposed Budget Attachment: A. Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission 1993 Proposed Budget Jim Daniels, the Cable Administrator, will present the Cable Commission’s proposed 1993 budget at the Council meeting. The Cable Commissicn's 1993 Budget has increased 20.8% or $24,601.00 over the 1992 budget. This increase reflects changes in both the operating and capital expenditures. Ope rat 1ng expenditures have increased 12.2% or $13,082. The two major areas of increase ate in access staff which reflects an increas/ in the hours of the part time office staff and advertising/proroo which reflects the newly initiated quarterly newsletter. The special funds have increased 80.3% or $9,220 to reflect a new initiative to cable cast city council meetings. The access development expend.tures of $9,000 are for contracted staff to operate the equipment needed for cablecasting of council meetings. The total proposed expenditures exceed total projected revenues by $18,950. The majority of this difference is expenditures related to the new program for the cable casting of council meetings. The Commission it using a portion of its fund balance to balance the budget. Because some of the excess expenditures are ongoing costa, the Commission needs to look closely at how the neK program will affect future budgets. 4 •%-rfr ■irjjr'Tf '•S^ •■»♦ •• f \ ^ « Lake Minnetonka 1ft -» < • ,‘^^ir• • •> r -r w > ■rs -' • • ■ ★-.........••••«.# • C ABLE *• ‘3C*«: «' f <y - ■■»■ - -•-r- -r^r* *>* • »• * -> 4 .• %» # , ftft^ •*-- - X, .V i‘J-# * 4 * ^ ♦ ' . .♦. •-■' • '-‘I.* '. 'T .. ',■• ^ f \' ■*. \- . ♦ ■* *mm~ • «»'l Communications Commission • I I «o 1993 PROPOSED BUDGET for administration and LOCAL CABLE PROGRAMMING -T^ - r If 1993 PROPOSED BUDGET Income Franchise Fees Interest $119,000.00 5,500.00 Operating Expenses Administrator Access Staff Secretarial Service Payroll Taxes Travel Expenses Health Insurance Legal Fees Insurance/Bonds $123,500.00 36,750.00 32,000.00 600.00 9.000. 00 1,600.00 4.200.00 2.000. 00 4.300.00 IMCCC Accounting/Audit 1,900.00 Conference/Convention 6,300.00 Office/Studio SuDolies 2,400.00 Membership Dues Telephone/Voice Mail Postage Miscellaneous Advertising/Prono Office Equipment Office Space/Rent Equip. Maint/Repair SALES TAX 1.300.00 1.750.00 1.250.00 900.00 4.000. 00 0.00 8.000. 00 1.200.00 $119 ,4 50.00 1,500.00 Adminstrator salary Prod. Coord, with part-time prod. asst, and admin, asst. Payroll ser-zices PEPA and Employer withholding contr Commission visibility at all cities plus MACTA and errands Amount attributed to employee health insurance Routine legal assistance Workers Comp., Dishonesty Bond, Property Liability Eookkeepina and annual audit MACTA - NATQA - NFLCP Normal office/studio supplies and copy machine agreement ra$30/roonth NATOA, MACTA, magazines, three loca Chambers of Commerce, Rotary Monthly service/ansvering seim/ice Commission agendas/correspondence Varies Four quarterly Newsletters to all fourteen cities/direct mail promo's N/A Office rent/bank box Increased hours on equipment SUB-TOTA*.$120,950.00 Special Funds Capital Funds 0.00 Tape Stock '0.00 Technical Audit 0.00 Financial Audit-Triax 500.00 For future audit if needed Studio Equipment 5,100.00 VideoToaster and misc. parts Legal Fund 100.00 For future legal counsel Office Equipment 1,000.00 Replacement or additional Access Equipment 5,000.00 Two porta-packs Access Development 9,000.00 Coverage of 10-12 council meeting plus film develop, and DeWolf audio Contingency 0.00 $20,700.00 SALES TAX 800.00 SUB-TOTAL $21,500.00 GRAiN'D TOTAL $142,450.00 1993 PROPOSED BUDGET INCOME - 1992 1993 Franchis* Tees $112,849.00 $118,000.00 Intsrsst 5,000.00 5,500.00 $117,849.00 $123,500.00 ■1^ EXPENSES • kamxnxmzr ator 35,000.00 36,750.00 5.0% Access Staff 28,200.00 32,000.00 13.4% Secretarial Service 558.50 600.00 7.4% Payroll Taxes/Pera 7,560.00 9 ,0 00,00 19.0% Travel Expenses 1,500.00 1,600.00 6.6% Health Insurance 3,800.00 4,200.00 10.5% Legal Fees 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.0% lnsurane«/londs 4,300.00 4,300.00 0.0% LHCCC Account in|/Audit fSO.OO 1,900.00 1001 Conference Seheels/Conventions 6,300.00 0,300.00 0.0% Lji^ r 1992 Officc/Studio Supplies 2,100.00 M«mb«rship Du«s/Subacriptions 1,000.00 T«l«phone Postage !1xsc«llan«ous Advertxaing/Profflo Office Equipnent Office Space/Fvcnt Equip. Haint/Repair SPECIAL FUNDS Capital funds Tape Stoeit Technical Audit rihahcial Audit - Triaa 1,750.00 1,200.00 900.00 750.00 N/A 7,500.00 1,000.00 . 1993 2,400.00 14.2% 1,300.00 1,750.00 1,250.00 900.00 N/A 8,000.00 1,200.00 $106,368.50 $119,450.00 1.47 0.00 1,236.70 0.00 500.00 0.00 soo.oo 500.00 30.0% 0.01 4.1% 0.0% 4,000.00 433.0% 0.01 6.6% 20.01 12.2% irnmM 1992 1993 Studio Equipment $ 100.00 5,100.00 L«gAl Fund 100.00 100.00 02:2 ic« Equxpfflent Access Equipment Accts*/Development 5,000.00 100.00 1,980.50 1,000.00 50001 0.0% 5,v00.00 ; 5000% 9,000.00 - 354% Contingency 1,961.83 0.00 SUB-TOTAL #11,480.50 $20,700.0^ • 80.3% SALES TAX 2,300.00 GP.AND TOTAL $117,849.00 $142,450.00 j 20.9% 1 A^sNlTBS OP THE ORONO SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING - August 18,^592 PIRE SERVICE ALTERNATIVES V ** ftr«AA meeting of the City Council of the City of OroW^^s pursuant to posted notice at 3.30 p.m., Tuesday, August '^4^ at the Orono Council Chambers with the following members prea«ot: ^ Mayor Barbara Peterson, CounciImembers Edward Callahan, GabVl^^. Jabbour, J, Diarn Goetten and Mary Butler, Also in attendance were City Administrator Ron Moorse and Deputy Clerk Lin Vee, Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 3:35 p.m. Mayor Peterson introduced the long Lake representatives, Scott Luse (Long Lake CounciImember) and Chris Dietzen (Long Lake City Attorney), who presented Long Lake's proposal for fire service, Mr. Dietzen discussed the proposal booklet each CounclImember received earlier in the day stating tabs 1-0 cover information requested by Orono including: revenue, expenditures, equipment list, equipment replacement plan, etc. According to information received from Orono, he understood the existing fire service areas were based, at least in part, on a study that Orono did in 1980. One of the areas of concern was the response time. He presented an aerial photo showing the location of fire departments serving Orono and proposed fire service boundaries. He indicated their proposal offers much better service and response time for fire and medical emergencies. On the issue of cost of service (under Tab 3), the proposed budget is $97,433. Rased on the past formula of 78.2%, that would result in a total figure for Orono of $76,192.61. Generally, Long l>ake was able to reduce the budget by eliminating the major equipment as an item of the budget thus being more comparable to other proposals. They would propose that as major equipment needs occur, they would look at bonding. The equipment Is in excellent shape and they could defer the need for new equipment for a period of time. Each line item has been reviewed as to possible reduction and some have been reduced. The current contract has been a fixed rate contract so Orono is billed a certain amount whether that money is actually spent or not. Some years have '^een under while others have been over budget when the extra an;<;unt has not been charged. The Police contract carries forward 'redits and additional expenses. Long Lake wou Id be wi 1 1 ing to < hange to that type of contract. Since Bkanagesient of *^he Piij Department has been a concern. Long Lake is suggesting a Fire Advisory Commission consisting of one member from Medina, orono and Long Lake. The City Council would appoint that persott and would not necessarily have to be an elected official. They would have the right, opportunity and ability to go to the monthly business meetings of the Fire Department end Officers Meetings «ind to indicate their concerns end issues they went addressed. They woulo have the right to certify the election of the Plre Chief end the Aseistsnt Fire Chief. Under the City charter, the City of Long Lake la required to cmtfi'f this election end they are willing to give this authority to ths* Fire Advisory Commlaaion. 1 i minutes of the ORONO special council meeting “ August 18, 1992 Shannon Madden, the medical and training officer for the Long Lake Fire Department, supplied information on response times. Kelly Shaughnessy, an officer of the Long Lake Fire Department, explained how fire calls are received. Jabbour commented that to go forward, they should ^e aware of concerns of the past. Orono has never had any problem with the Fire Department and its capability to perform. His concern lies with the capability of the Fire Department to function within the parameters that Orono wishes. Dietzen added that he had advised the Long Lake Council and Fire Department that this should be treated as a business, being cost competitive and providing services to customers. He also had told Rick Perry, the Fire Chief, that he would have to attend Orono Council meetings and make reports to the Council. Jabbour stated his concerns over the Long Lake City Council eliminating 10% of the budget, some of the fire people feeling unable to function on this budget cut, and money being diverted to the general fund for the City of Long Lake. Luce stated that communication could be directly from the Fire Department to other cities rather than from the Long Lake City Offices. They have also asked the Fire Chief to appoint someone to take over the administrative role of the Fire Department who would perform like an officer providing monthly reports. Goetten expressed her concern over the $0 major equipment fund. Shaughnessy said this was also a major concern of the Fire Department and these discussions sliould help all people Involved. Goetten asked how the Fire Department would obtain new equipment when necessary. Luse explained that if the purchase were over $400,000, it would be a referendum and under $400,000 would be through bonding. Me added that in the proposal they were trying to compare their budget to those of other cities and eliminating the major equipment fund seemed to be the closest comparison. Shaughnessy stressed the importance of negotiation between the cities of Long Lake and Orono. City Administrator Moorse stated a major issue that still exists is the capital equipment replacement and Its financing. He compared some of the other proposals regarding this Issue to Long Lake*s equipsient replacement. His concern is that, although Long Lake has responded to Orono's concern over cost, those reductions have been through capital equipment replacement monies and seem to be a short term savings. Luse pointed out that in the budget only Interest on the bonds is included, not principal, as costs to be shared by participating cities. Jabbour asked if the princip.'l payment comes out of Long Lake's City Budget or Capital Outlay. Mayor Swartwood stated that Long Lake had not been faced with that situation but that it would be a capital outlay. Administrator Moorse restated the question, *ls the coot when we finance a new (iece of equipment now when we don't have MINUTES OF THE ORONO SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING - August 18, 1992 an equipment fund to pay for it and we bond for it and we have principal and interest payments, is that going to be shared among the cities?" Mayor Swartwood replied that just the interest would be shared and the prinicpal would be picked up by the City of Long Lake. Jabbour asked what percentage Medina pays. Dietzen responded that Medina pays roughly 4% and Long Lake 18%. Jabbour feels capital outlay should be included in the budget. Dietzen stated the percentages were arrived at by using assessed values o£ homes but could be negotiated. Mayor Peterson stated that in all fairness to Long Lake, a decision should be made at a later time when CounciImembers have had an opportunity to study the proposal. Shaughnessy invited members to the upcoming Fire Department Officers Meeting and cautioned Council to avoid using a formula based on the number of fire calls received. Mayor Peterson also noted that in comparing proposals, the first year's bid may be more attractive to "get your foot in the door" and future years may not be as attractive. She reiterated that response time is of utmost importance and decisions will be based on this. Goetten added that sharing of services between cities to reduce costs is becoming more important. Comments were received from the following members of the public: Gary Printup, Mr. Tourangeau, Mike Ellis, Dr. John Saqehorn, Cliff Otten, Dianne Jentilucci, Jim Cox, Marv Siebold, Lloyd Fairbank, Rodney Minick, and Peg. They expressed major concern over response times. They noted that a dollar value cannot be put on human lives and reported several incidents where the quick response time of the Fire Department was important. There were comments and questions regarding Wayzata's ability to provide increased service. They asked that Council make a decision regarding Fire contracts for the "right" reasons and keep communications open between Long Lake and Orono. Callahan questioned why the cost of the same response time is 50% higher from Long Lake than other cities. Jabbour reminded Long L®ke to be competitive making it impossible for Orono to make a decision to establish their own Fire Department. Callahan stated there may be explanations regarding higher costs that are acceptable and that even if the costs are higher, it doesn't mean Orono would not choose Long Lake's proposal. The figures may not bt» correct or understood. Mayor Peterson stated that in the past Orono has not asked to .e involved in the administration of the Fire Department. She thanked Long I.ake for providing the information requested and as a courtesy to long I.ake felt Council should take tioM to review their proposal and decision on the Fire Department contract. Dietzen again volunteered Long Lake's willingness to answer any questions Orono nay have. [^Jk MINUTES OF THE ORONO SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING - August 18, 1992 There were questions as to when a decision would be made regarding the Fire Contracts. Mayor Peterson stated there will be public hearings at the regular Council meetings and thought a decision would be made by mid-September. The meeting adjourned at 5:45 p.m. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor i Representative of Long Lake ATTEST: Lin Vee, Deputy Clerk % C( MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIl HELD SEPTEMBER 14, 1992 •ETIMCP - ROLL Or.V(1 The Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Barbara Peterson, CounciImembers J. DIann Goetten, Gabriel Jabbour, Edward Callahan and Mary Butler. The following represented the City staff: Acting City AdmlnIstrator John Gerhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Joanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, City Attorney Thomas Barrett, City Engineer Glenn Cook and City Recorder Teri Naab. Finance Director Tom Kuehn and Chief of Police Stephen Sullivan arrived later In the meeting. Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. (#1) CONSENT AGENDA Butler added Items «9, ll and 12 and removed Item #22 from the Consent Agenda. Callahan removed Items S2 and 22. Gerhardson added Item tf16. Goetten said she did not feel the City should have to pay half of the charges. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Butler, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 5, nays 0. Motions for all items adopted by consent agenda will be Included In the minutes In their respective numerical order. (•2) APPROVAL OF MINUTES Callahan referred to Page 2, paragraph 8. He recalled that Mr. i.uce pointed out the principal for purchasing the capital equipment would come from the City of Long Lake, and at some point in the meeting, in response by a specific question from Jabbour, the Mayor of Long Lake stated that Long Lake would pay for the capital improvements. Al I Members agreed and asked that the minutes be changed to reflect that conversation. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to table approval of the minutes of the special Council meeting of August 18, 1992. Ayes 8, nays o. Butler suggested that a representative of the Lor.g lake Council also sign the epproved minutes. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 14, 1992 (*#3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moveJ by Goetten, seconded by Butler, to approve the minutes of the regular Council meeting of August 24, 1992. Ayes 5, nays 0. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (•4) 41748 ROBERT & RITA HOVLANO, 1245 NORTH ARM DRIVE > CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE Rita Hovland was present. Mabusth explained that the appiication was reviewed by the Planning Commission at both the July and August meetings. Pianning Commission denied the amended propose' based on size of the structure and the Planning Commission felt because of that size, the structure should meet the setback ordinance. The building has been reduced from 30’x33’ to 25’x36’. Lot coverage was no longer an Issue. Goetten suggested shifting the building thereby only requiring one variance. She questioned the structure width of 25’ and noted boards come in 24’ lengths. She stated it would be less expensive to bulId the garage at a 24’ width. Jabbour noted the applicants may have felt they should not impose more on one of the adjacent neighbors. He asked Mrs. Hovland to comment on Goetten’s question. Hovland stated once the walls are up, a 24’ wide garage would be reduced to 23’ of usable space inside and they need 24’. She pointed out one Planning Commission member did vote for the proposal because he felt they had followed the directives of the Planning CoaNnisslon. Callahan referred to the minutes of the July 20th meeting where the applicants stated the reason the large garage was needed was because their son was moving into the house and has two vehicles and a boat. He asked if the applicants were trying to make the property hold more equipment than Is feasiple Hovland noted the graveled area has beer* reduced to one car width and will be used more as a convenience as the garage Is tar fri^ the entrance to the front of the house. 2 F MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 14, 1992 ZONING FILE #1748 - CONT. Butler felt there were a couple of appiIcatlons before them tonight where the applicants were caught between two groups of Planning Commission members. She felt applicants that complied with the directives of the Planning Commission should be recognized for doing so. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Jabbour, to direct staff to draft a resolution approving setback variances for Application #1748 for Robert and Rita Hovland of 1245 North Arm Drive, approving a 15* side setback from the north lot line and a 13* setback from the south lot line. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#5) #1750 CHARLES A SHIRLEY PYLE, 3548 IVY PLACE - VARIANCES Charles and Shirley Pyle and Daryl Hanson were present. Mabusth explained this application was also reviewed at both the July and August Planning Commission meetings. She noted the revised proposal includes additional removal of 75-250* hardcover at 172 s.f., and the 663 s.f. roof structure originally proposed has been reduced to 374 s.f. She noted the real issue for this proposal is the lot coverage. Lot coverage was originally proposed at 24.5X and has been reduced to 21.5X. The Planning Commission recommended approval based on lot coverage be held at 18X, which would mean the applicants would have to give up eithar the roof structure or the family room addition. Butler stated here is another situation where the applicants ».ere given directives from the Planning Commission and came back with a proposal and were denied. Goetten felt that does not mean that the vote should have been changed. Jabbour agreed witii Butler. He expressed concern about residents exerting energy and money on revised plans and the City does not act in good faith. Qoetten stated the lot Is small and has exressive amounts of hardcover. She asked the applicants if there were any other artes where they could reduce hardcover. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 14, 1992 ZONING FILE ilTSO - CONT. Hanson said from the beginning they knew they would have to make concessions, and they tried to reduce the hardcover prior to submitting the original proposal. After the first Planning Commission meeting they were asked to reduce hardcover percentages more, which they have done. Jabbour noted that at one point a project becomes over ambitious for the lot. He stated the City’s ordinances reflect their concern about water run-off into the Lake. Mr. Pyfe said the first group of Planning Commission members to review the proposal did visit the site and felt the project was beneficial, but the second group did not inspect the property. Goetten stated she appreciates the cuts the applicants have proposed, but felt the project too ambitious for the lot. She agreed with the Planning Commission’s recommendation of 18* total lot coverage. Mrs. PvIe referred to two small planting areas In the 0-75’ setback area. She stated t^he boxes around the plantings and plastic underneath could be 'removed. Mabusth stated this would reduce 0-75’ hardcover by 177 s.f. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve AppIicat ion Si 750 for Char Ies and ShirIey PyIe, 3548 Ivy Place, for variances to construct an addition to the existing residence, based on Condition fl of the resolution be removed and a condition that the triangular planting arrss and plastic underneath be removed, and limiting lot area coverage to 21.5*. Ayes 2, nays 3. Callahan, Jabbour and Goetten voted nay. Motion failed. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to table AppIIcatlon • 1750 for Charles and Shirley Pyle for two weeks to allow the applicants time to reconsider their proposal. Ayes 3, nays 2. Mayor Peterson and Butler voted nay. Motion carried. Ooetten explained that if the application were denied, the appiI cants would not be allowed to return with another proposal for iI X mon t ha. 1 1i ti f MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 14, 1992 (•6) #1757 ALBERT D. HANSER, 1685 FOX STREET - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3176 Albert Hanser and Jack Taylor were present. Mabusth explained this is a request for a conditional use permit for a guest house use. She noted the applicant has followed the directives of the preliminary subdivision approval and have filed the application. The structure is non-conforming because of its substandard setback from a recreational development lake. The issue for this review is the requirement of the septic code to repiace the system if it is deemed non-conforming. She stated it has been found non-conforming the based on septic test information received for the rest of the property, mound systems would have to be installed on the property due to the high water table. The age of the system suggests the required 3’ separation could not be met. The guest house currently has a standard trench system. Based on code requIrements, the system would have to be replaced within 12 months. Hanser stated he has lived in Orono for 204- years and his property is acres. He referred to a letter from Sullivans which attests to the functionality of the septic system and how It has been maintained In the past. He said it would cost cs much money to prove the system meets the code as would a new system. He noted they do not rent the guest house and their daughter lives there now. He said he would be willing to make a written commitment that they will continue to maintain the system as has been dona In the past. Hanser indicated the rules have changed dramatically since they started the subdivision process and they have been caught in the middle. Taylor stated the Council should consider the rule, if It Isn't broken, don't fix it. He stated the septic system was installed per the code effective at the time, which the current ordinance requires. He noted weckman indicated the system may be dumping pollutants Into the water, and Taylor asked whose responsibility It was to prove. Qoetten said she asked the same question. She stated she was told an on-aite evaluator could clarify that issue for a couple hundred dollars. She felt that would not be too much to ask. Jabbour stated this is a policy question on non-conforming aystem. He felt the applicant nas presented a very good subdivision and akpreaaed a desire to work with him to resolve the issues. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 14, 1992 ZONING FILE #1757 - CONT. Gaffron reviewed why the new shoreland regulations have more restrictive standards than previous codes. He explained that for about 15 years there has been a standard for ail new systems that If there is mottling present, which is an indicator in the soil that there is a seasonal perched water table, a 3’ separation above the mottling is required. The DNR and the PCA mandated that any existing system that does not meet that separation is considered a non-conforming system, and In shoreland areas, the DNR has said those systems must be made conforming. Gaffron explained that staff does not have all the facts regarding the septic system for the guest house, and absent testing in the immediate area of the system, staff has had to look at testing done on the remainder of the property which indicates mound systems would be required. He said the logical thing to do would be to hire a site evaluator to do soil borings at the site of the existing drainfleld to determine its relationship to the mottling elevation. Hanser stated the rules keep changing and felt the City should not continue to hold up the subdivision process because of this issue. He said he would be happy to hire an evaluator. Jabbour asked if the system Is now considered Illegal conforming. non- Gaffron stated by definition, the system Is non-conforming and cannot stay that way based on the new shoreland requ1rements. Taylor indicated the definition of a conforming system is one built to codes not withstanding its location. Barrett opined that if the City decides to change its rules, they mtist add an obligation to provide for non-conforming structures, and if that Is not provided for, it might be considered a taking of property. However, the regulatory values Imposed by the DNR, PCA and the City with respect to shoreland property, may Involve o public interest which is high enough to allow the City to regulate even non-conforming uses and require them to be upgraded. Jabbour asked if they have a way to aiiow the subdivision to continue conditioned upon the applicant providing the information required to prove the system is either conforming or non- conformi ng. 6 r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 14, 1992 ZONING FILE tl757 - CONT. Mabusth stated they can add a condition In the conditional use permit resolution with regard to the septic system and noted that the subdivision application is completely separate from the conditional use permit application, so that the conditional use permit can be approved and not hold up the subdivision. Taylor said they would like an additional time period for testing. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution #3176 for Application #1757 for Albert D. Hanser, 1685 Fox Street, for a conditional use permit to allow the guest house use, amending the condition allowing a one month testing period and if deemed non-conforming, a one year time period to replace the system. Ayes 5, nays 0. Hanser added that If the system needs to be replaced. It would diminish his property values. Qaffron stated he would be happy to meet the applicant and his site evaluator on the site when the soil borings are commenced. (#7) #1758 JAMES LAWRENCE, 1650 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3177 It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3177 for Application #1758 for James Lawrence, 1550 Sixth Avenue North, approving a conditional use permit for a guest house use. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#8) #1759 P. PROFT/R. WELLS, 60/70 MYRTLEWOOD ROAD - SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT - RESOLUTION #3178 Robert Mitchell was present to represent the applicants. Mabusth explained the subdivision involves approximately 1/3 of an acre, hx(f of which is wetland. The Wells’ property currently consists of 1.6 acres. The area proposed to be subdivided off could not be used for septic purposes due to its proximity to the wetland. There is not an alternate septic site on the Weils' property, but the existing system could be expanded upon. The area in question appears to be part of tho Proft property. Mitchell reviewed the Proft residence ie oriented to face the southwest. He stated without the Profts controlling the area, it la an invitation for a nuisance to occur In the future. The Profts wish to stabllixa the neighborhood situation. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 14, 1992 ZONING FILE #1759 - CONT. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution •3178 for Application #1759 for P. Proft and R. Wells, 60 and 70 Myrtlewood Road, subdivision of a lot line rearrangement. Ayes 6, nays 0. (*•9) t1/S0 ERIC NIELSEN, 2140 PROSPECT AVENUE - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3179 It was me ed by Goetten, seconded by Butler, lo adopt Resolution •3179 for Application 41760, Eric Nielsen, 2140 Prospect Avenue, for variances to construct a new residence. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*•10) 845 OLD LONG LAKE ROAD - AMENDMENT OF EASEMENT It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Butler, to approve the filing of an amended drainage and utility easement for Hilltop Farm and direct the Ma>or and Clerk to execute the Consent Form. Ayes 5, nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT A) Butler referred to Item #9. She stated that if this Is a common lot size and configuration in the neighborhood, as stated numerous times, and sewer is available, the Council should seriously consider rezoning the area. Callahan cautioned the City In doing so as they have been Informed by the Metropolitan Council that the City should rezone to larger parcels. B) Goetten urged all to vote In the primary. C) Jabbour reported on the PubIic Access Task Force. He explained the LMCD originally thought tha momoers of the Task Force should be divided into 25 sub-committees. The Task Force was finally divided Into two groups commissioned to study the criteria for counting car/traller park Ing spaces and for actually count Ing those •paces. He said the LMCD was incapable of conducting the meetings •o a facilitator was hired. He explained that after the criteria was agreed upon, the spaces were counted, but the LMCD did not agree with the number they came up with and those numbers were manipulated. The Chairman of the Task Force was about to report to the LMCD Board on those findings when Jabbour discovered the numbers had been changed from 845 pa»'king spaces to 148. At the last meeting, the LMCD realized the original numbers might be correct. M© said he has volunteered to raise the money to hire a certified engineer to draw those parking spaces on half section maps based on the negotiated criteria. He realized at the last •Meting, that the LMCO was chipping away at the criteria. 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 14, 1992 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. Jabbour expressed his frustration with the Task Force and thanked the City of Minnatrlsta for attending those meetings. He felt the City should revise their position and inform the DNR that they wish to deal directly with the DNR on the access Issue. He reported the ONR is preparing a drawing to present on the Maxwell Bay access at the September 28th meeting. He suggested to the DNR that they discuss the proposal with the neighbors. Qoetten asked If there were any other locations within Zone 1 that could be used for access. Jabbour explained the City has a promise from the DNR that the Maxwell Bay access will not proceed until the Task Force comes up with findings. He noted the City has made land available In Zone 1 for future access use. He added now there is a wiI Iing buyer and seller for this site. Callahan stated he was not under the Impression that the Task Force would be dealing with details of the access site. Jabbour stated he told the Task Force that the City Council of Orono will be adamant that Orono standards should apply on Orono land. He stated It is v*#ry embarrassing for the L.'ke Minnetonka community to ba portrayed In front of the State Legislators that out of 8,000 boats on the Lake, there is 148 available to the general public and the rest are private. He said his question to the LMCD is. "What hava you been doing in the last 30 years, and out of the 148 spaces, 67 are within Orono at North Ar', and they are planning an additional 60-70 within 2,000 feet. There is 152 miles of lakeshore, why is Orono paying more than its fair share?" He added because of foresight h. the early I970s by the City to have open land, and the pressure is on those that did the right thing. He suggested the Council express their desire to have the Task Force dissolved after it presents Its findings and let Orono deal directly with ONR. ENGINEER’S REPORT (Sill) pay request si - LIFT STATION S9 It was moved by Qoetten, seconded by Butler, to authorize Pay Request si for Lift Station S9 renovation to New Hech CosK»ani ea in the amount of $10,972.90. Ayaa 9, nays 0. (IS 12) PAYMENT REQUEST f2 • STUBBS BAY SEWER PROJECT ft was moved by Goet.*n, seconded by Butler, to authorize Payment e2 for the Btubbt Bay aanttary sewer project, to Progreaaive Contrectors, Inc., tn the amount of 1309.777.08. Ayaa 9. nays 0. 9 laiBiiBAdaiU MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 14, 1992 (•12A) PAY REQUEST «2 - 400,000 GALLON ELEVATED TANK It W3S moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Jabbour, to authorize Payment #2 for the 400,000 gallon elevated tank to PDM, Inc. In the amount of $130,492.00. Ayes 5, nays 0. (•13) LONG LAKE FIRE CONTRACT Chris DIetson ind Butch Loomis were present. Oietson understood the status of the fire contract as set forth In his letter dated September 10th. He explained after the special meeting held on August 18th, Moorse sent him a letter on August 2flth. After that, a meeting was held with representatIves from both cities to adjust the contract. As a result of that meeting. Long Lake proposed the terms set forth in his letter. He stated at the conclusion of that meeting, Moorse and Sullivan were going to recommend approval of the proposal to Orono Council. He reviewed! the terms of the contract. Callahan clarified that Moorse suggested to Council r'ouId consider a three year contract. DIetson agreed. Oietson that the Loomis stated at the end of the meeting two weeks ago, both Moorse end Sullivan said they would recommend the three year contract. Jabbour explained that Moorse has not had the chance to deal with the CcuncII's concerns. He said he would not agree to a contract until those concerns are addressed. He stated he would like fo do things on a longer term. He Indicated there are four other mun icipalities In the background wa i t i ng for a response f rom Orono. Qoetten noted t* Council expressed concerned about any contract other than a one year contract as there ar© several issues the two cities need to further discuss. She understood the Orono Council was willing to accept the terms proposed at the meeting held on August 18th. DIetson stated the Counc11 *s posItion is a surprise to him. Me said Hoorse's letter stated they would accept the proposal presented on August 18th with two modifications i»ith respect to capital equipment and the advisory committee. Me called Moorse at that time and told him if was not acceptable and they had another meeting. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 14, 1992 LONG LAKE FIRE CONTRACT - CONT. Callahan reiterated at the special meeting held on August 18th, both Dietson and the Mayor of Long Lake stated that Long Lake was going to pay for the capital equipment and It was suggested to Long lake that Orono would accept that offer. He noted the equipment Long Lake was going to pa'* for was $28,000 and now they are proposing to pay for $14,000 worth of equipment. He said it occurred to him that Long Lake did not have the money to pay for the equipment, but he has read in the newspaper that not only do they have money to pay for the $28,000, but indeed they have enough to pay for the whol ^ fire department. Mayor Peterson noted the approval of the proposal was tabled at the August 18th meeting because she had not received the proposal In time to properly review. She reiterated that Moorse has been listening to five different people and may have felt the Council was going to accept a three year contract. She stated after their meeting with Moorse the previous Thursday afternoon, he was aware of the Council’s position. Dietson said he was not authorised to accept a one year contract and would need to take the counter offer back to Long Lake for their corsI derat I on. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to direct the City Administrator to negotiate a one year contract prior to September 22, 1992 based on terms of the contract submitted by Long Lake at the special meeting held on August 18, 1992. Ayes 3, nays 2. Callahan and Butler voted nay. Motion carried. Mayor Peterson asked Loomis to consider another special meeting to discuss the contract. (•14) SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT - VIKINO BA5SMASTERS' FISHING TOURNAMENT Tom Nelson and Ted Kowalski were present. Kowalski explained the bass club is similar to soft ball groups. He stated the tournament has been held at North Shore Marina for the last 16 years, and Is geared toward family involvement. He noted they are a non-profit organt/atlon and they donate any money mads on the tournament. He said they try to keep the group as quiet as possible. They launch at North Arm and have inspectors on site looking for exotics. He felt by denying their license, the Council Mould not be putting any pressure on North Shore Marina as they do not get any benefit from the event. J ■w MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 14, 1992 SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT - CONT. Mayor Peterson suggested the Bass Club begin the process earlier the next year. Kowalski asked that the Council consider waiving the late fee. It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Goetten, to approve the Viking Bass Masters application for a special event permit for a fishing tournament at North Shore Marina on October 4, 1992, and to refund the late fee, with the understanding that the penalty will not be waived In future years. Ayes 4, nays 0. Jabbour abstaIned. (#15) GRONBERG (LEAF STREET LOT) ASSESSMENT Mayor Peterson recommended tabling this Issue as she had just received the Information from Mr. Grcnberg’s attorney. She noted specific questions raised In the information, and felt in all fairness to Gronberg, the Council should have a chance to review the Information. She stated the Council would make a decision at their meeting of September 28th. It was moved by Mayor Petersonv seconded by Jabbour, to table consideration of Donald Qronberg’s Stubbs Bay sewer assessment appeal. Ayes 5, nays 0. (•#18) ESTABLISH PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR CERTIFICATION OF HAZARDOUS BUILDINGS ASSESSMENT It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Butler, to set a public hearing for October 12, 1992 at 7:00 p.m. at the Council Chambers to consider the special assessment roll for the 1992 hazardous buildings. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#17) 1393 BUDGET & PROPOSED TAX LEVY - RESOLUTION iaiSO Kuahn noted Moorse he* proposed e $10,000 increase In the general fund operat Ing expense and has not proposed any changes in property tax or reserve. Jabbour felt the Council needed to thoroughly review the budget at a workshop. Goetten was concerned about making additional coeipenaate for cute in State aid. Ilowances to MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 14, 1992 1993 BUDGET A PROPOSED TAX LEVY - CONT. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Ma>or Peterson, Resolution #3180 approving the proposed maximum 1992 coliectible in 1993 at a 5.6X increase. to adopt tax i evy Butier asked why the difference in the doiiar amounts shown for the general fund and the tax levy. Kuehn stated the tax levy amount does not Include all sources of revenue. Jabbour said that residents will not understand that a 6.5* sales tax has been Included in expenditures, which is something new the Clty must pay. Kuehn stated because of the HACA increase proposed, there will be a reduction in property taxes paid to the City. He added the tax capacity for the City has changed actually affects the percentage paid. Jabbour noted during the workshop he will be trying to reduce line Items in order to build an additional reserve fund. Vote: Ayes 2, nays 3. Ooetten, Callahan and Butler voted nay. Mot ion failed. Goetten stated she does not want to be locked into reducing line iterns. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution §3180 approving the proroted maximum 1992 tax levy collectible In 1993 of $2,120,135; Ayes 3, nays 2. Mayor Peterson and Jabbour voted nay. Motion carried. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to establish the proposed 1993 General Fund expenditure budget in the amount ot $3,163,715. Ayes 3, nays 2. Mayor Peterson and Jabbour voted nay. Motion carried. (§18) LEE a JULIE MARREN INCLU81 OH/EXCLUSION FROM STUBBS BAY SEWER PROJECT Lee Harren was present. Jabbour sgree-i with Mr. Marren that th# exclusion criteria has changed sine# the beginning. 1 j MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 14, 1992 HARREN - STUBBS BAY SEWER PROJECT - CONT. Mayor Peterson also agreed. Gaffron noted there were two additional properties Included with the project based or the design of the pipe. He said the question here is, are there additional properties with similar situations as Harren? Jabbour asked how far Harren is from the Lake. Gaffron said Harren Is approximately 500’ from the Lake but geographically one could argue that the property should be hooked up to sewer. He stated the pipe would have gone right by his house if It had been placed in the street, and properties on both sides of him will be sewered. Butler suggested that a future owner will be extremely mad at the City when the septic system falls and he finds out the City did not force the owner to connect at this time. Jabbour said 'f it were his house he would hook up immediately. He stated he is trying to interpret the City’s philosophy. Goatten asked If the property Is within the MUSA boundaries. Gaffron noted that line has been set to be concurrent with the two acre zoning district. Butler said that after making accommodations In the design of the sewer responding to Harren’s concerns, for h*m to now say he does not want sewer is unthinkable. Harren Indicated he was not involved in the discussion to move the pipe. He felt the City moved the pipe to best serve their interests, not his. He stated he tried to suggest to the City the oest alternative. He added. In 1989 he Installed a new mound system and was told at that time he could not use a holding tank until the sewer was available. He noted he was included because of a technicality, and he should be excluded for the same criteria. Gaffron said from early on the City h»s tried to accommodate Harren. He referred to a letter dated In 1989 to Eiden Construction stating he would be happy to discuss options of action with regards to *he septic system. ] MIi'UTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CCUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 14, 1992 HARREN - STUBBS BAY SEWER PROJECT - CONT. Cook stated the cheapest way to hook the property to sewer would be to run the pipe to the west, leaving the effluent pump in and connecting It to the sewer line. Harren stated the pipe would then run through his grove of black walnut trees and under his pool. He stated the line would be over 260* . Cook said the line would be half as expensive as the gravity line to the east. Jabbour asked the difference between the Harren and the 11se situation. Gaffron said there was no difference, and the lises were given the option of being excluded from the project. Callahan agreed with Butler on the position of a future owner, and suggested filing a document in the chain of title expressing the City’s position that It will be the responsibility of the property owner to connect to the sewer at a later date. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to exclude Lee and Julie Harren’s property at 175 Landmark Drive from the Stubbs Bay sewer project, subject to the owner signing a document to be filed within the chain of title notifying any future owner of the responsibility to connect to the sewer at their expense within one year if and when the septic system fails. Ayes 4. nays 1. Butter voted nay. Motion carried. Barrett stated the document could perhaps be done in conjunction with the settlement for litigation. Harren asked that he not be required to incur addHionai tegal expense. Callahan noted the document is to protect the City and the City will draft the appropriate document. He added, the City Is not recommending to Harren that he sign such document. Qoetten stated the felt the City had been desling with all owners In good faith with regard to thia project. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 14, 1992 (il9) ESTABLISH DATE FOR KELLEY PARKWAY DEDICATION Dedication of Kelley Parkway was set for Wednesday, October 14, 1992 at 4:00 p.m. (•20) RECYCLING AGREEMENT Qerhardson explained there is not an increase in the new recycling contract and the cocnpany has added the col lection of magazines. He felt the City may be able to get a longer term contract which could save the City money, and stated he would contact the recycling company about this. He reported the County has changed the method of refund from a percentage to an entitlement, which will reduce the refund by approximately $3,000. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Callahan, to extend the recycling agreement with E~Z Recycling for 1993 and add the col lection of magazines to the items being picked up, for an amount not to exceed $63,180. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*•21) COMPENSATION ADJUSTMENT $ PERFORMANCE REVIEW - POLICE CHIEF It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Butler, to increase Stephen Sullivan’s salary from Level 12, Step II to Level 12, Step III effective August 19, 1992. In addition, when the Compensation Plan is adjusted effective January 1, 1993, his salary will be adjusted accordingly. Ayes 5, nay* 0. (•22) COMBINED CHANGE ORDER FOR CITY FACILITIES TO REFLECT CURRENT BUDGET STATUS Butler stated provided the frustratIon. this Is the second time the contractor has not Information requested, and she expressed her Jabbour asked staff to take the time to explain this frustration to the contractor. (••23) POLICE SERVICE CONTRACT WITH THE CITY OF LONG LAKE It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Butler, to accept the Information regarding the Police Service Contract with the City of Long Lave. Ayes 9, nays 0. (*•24) FALL CLEAN UP DATE It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Butler, to designate October 17, 1092 as the Fall Clean Up Day with the guidelines esteblished as noted in the memo of Septefliber »0, 1992. Ayes 9, nays 0. i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 14, 1992 (*#25) APPOINT ADDITIONAL ELECTION JUDGES - RESOLUTION #3181 It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Butler, to adopt Resolution #3181 appointing additional election judges for the primary election to be held September 15, 1992 and the General Election to be held November 3, 1992. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#26) LICENSES Callahan noticed Mr. Larson Is requesting a license for the Parade of Homes. He said a rumor has swept through the City that perhaps In obtaining permission to change the driveway configuration, the full facts were not revealed by Larson, or rather were concealed. He suggested staff review the tape of the discussion with Mr. Larson, and should there appear to be a discrepancy in the statement concerning maple trees In particular and the facts about the maple trees, that the permit not be granted. He said ho recalled Mr. Larson Indicating a major reason for the reconfiguration of the driveway was to save mature maple trees. It was suggested afterwards that no maple trees exist on the property in that Iocation. Mabusth noted she found that the Building Inspector did not understand driveway placement in the development, but staff will revisit the issue of driveway placement in the Sugarwoods plat. Jabbour understood there was construction crews. a straight drive being used by She clarified v;hen standing on site and looking straight up towards the garage openings, as stated by the developer, it appeared some young maple trees would be lost with that driveway alignment. The straight drive used by construction crews ia actually in a different location than the driv» staked for Council's review at their September 14th meeting. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson to approve the following Iicenses: Septic System Installer License: Duane Ritter Excavating Special Event Permit - Parade of Komes: Scott Larson Homes. 2112 Sugar »oods Drive Richwood Homes, 2455 Oid Beach Road L. Cramer Co., 2012 Sugar Hoods Drive Cudd Company. 2110 Sugar woods Drive Ayes S, nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 14, 1992 («I27) BILLS It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Butler, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Ayes 5, nays 0. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Peterson adjourned the regular Orono City Coun 10:06 p.m. to Executive Session. Ayes 5, nays 0. I meeting at Barbara Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hall In, City Clerk 18 L TO:Orono City Council FROM:Bev Blomberg Marge Gasch JoEllen Hurr DATE: ITEM: September 25, 1992 Haxwell Bay Access Facility We have had three meetings with the dnr concerning the proposed access on Maxwell Bay. There has been good communication between the people involved and it is important to have some concept review suggestions from the city at this time. We feel that Proposal c, with expansion to the east a future possibility, is definitely the plan to pursue. If Proposal C is accomplished, then off street parking for lake access in Zone 1 would be accomplished. On street lake access parking could be prohibited in Zone l. The dnr should then look to other areas (zones) for similar compliance with the requirements before any additional sites in Zone 1 are pursued. 0^^AVPUSWC Access voii^ A10^ 'S^ftii dcvd u )44c ^ u(Mn u^pa jit pvt>po^() ac^s ern maximal 4au. ^ U 9-io:so rtm Otwo •4jj.\AifNU4L-fe commu#s \ovfJ bL accvcH^. ^U\ir> Auv»' rt\ixQt ^ascb Aa> <^o»MJb()f9 S7l-^?6l *1TI~ 8in *nh?7S(, * SrrATB OF MINNESOTADEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Region 6 TniiU & Waterways OFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: THRU: Soj)lembcr 24, 1992 Maxwell fiav Concept Plan Recipient! Gordon Klmball^^^^ Regional Tmila and Waterways Supervisor FROM:Martha Reger Area Trails and Waterwayi Supervisor PHONE;772-7938 SUB«XT: l,AKE MINNETONKA.MAXWELL BAY CONCEPT PLANS Please find Attached some rough concept plans for alicmativc public access silci located on Maxwell Bay of Lake Minnetonka. These concha h»ve been developed in rerponse to an LCMR gram that would potentially give some dollars to purchase additional pro perty out on hioxwelt Bay for the purpose of a public access. The doU^s are not guaranteed rs of yet and are not earmarked for specific parcels of property. Tlie DNR has been working with a committee of residents th>t live on Maxwell lay, as well ai Hennepin County Engineers to design these concepts. Thy/ have been dcvcidpsd based on DNK typical standaids, as well as comments from tho Maxwell Bay residents, Hernn pin County, and cotn.nenta heard from previous designs, they are for discuttkn and comme it purposes only. Any commems regirdinf these plans should be directed to the DcptrlmettofNatufi' Resitreet, attention Gordon Kimball, 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 5SI06 idoe:ml8 CJOt^ePT P1-AN_;A LAK^ niHNeiDrlAXW^U- BAY iWiTL mWMA ^RY^tAU &a Y '■6AU.'HW»J» 0 M ^l?0 ■4 ♦ «HMNttOia ...... — —Ef w-«»— 1 1« 1 •_____%^ - - - -<.-—w 1-^ iJ t<Ohu:iJpr PL-AH rllNNEIOHK^BAt 4AYL&3 Imta] ^VATe- mWMA i^WtAL- &AY HCWff40^* 5)V0^ ► - ‘-------- <> -- —1---------- —^-------- h>» — <►_.. . -- 1 rtA |M^A«faiitit ^ MAmtAi. ittiOMCil ♦►------------ rvv^Miu- » V V I? ' % r \(* ^40H6^PT PLAN "6”LAKg. hlMN^roNKA WATEI?- A^^ nAyWOL 6AY s"rfA.UC* *1 • « «» 1 1 X-. •- 3i=^n~. .* “ * CQiCen PLAN "D"[Mt niHN^tONKA WAteR. AO^ MAXUieU. &AY » I ‘ 1• » 1 . .•• wirittttmriir^r*^*“* o# MArMM titOMCtt fN6*Nftt^NC» ^ V4 l>f tf ‘r*^.>.t4-w &-vr illJffSLr- _. ___________ ^ ' "' ^ •»<—---------------------«_— ) (**.-.1 .t j Co CITY q Lp ^ >991 ‘.»G A RESOLUTION GRANTING GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 10 AND A VARIANCE TO SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 9 (E) FILE *1748 WHEREAS, Robert Hovland (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 1245 North Arm Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 2, Eloc)c 4, Saga Hill Revised, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHBRE'.i?, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit to permit the installation of an accessory structure on a through lot per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subd. 10 and a variance to Section 10.03, Subd. 9 (E) that would allow the 900 s.f. structure to be placed 13' from the north side lot line instead of the required 15'. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of mesota:Orono, Minnesota: PIIIDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning Pile 11748, 2. The property is located in the LR-IB Single Family La)ceshore Residential Zoning District requiring one acre in area. The property consists of 11,787 s.f. or .27 acres in area. 3. On September 14, 1992 the Orono City Ccuncil reviewed the application as amended and conceptually approved the conditional use permit and variance application, based on the following findings and ha dshipst A. The lot measures 53' in width at the required rear yard setback of 35*. If total required side setback area of 30* is to be met, the width of the structure would be limited to 23*. Page 1 of 5 B. There are no adjacent lands available for purchase. C. Placing widest portion of structure in an east/west direction has minimized tree removal and the saving of mature trees within the rear yard maintaining a natural visual buffer from adjacent yards. D. The lower elevations to the rear or west side of the lot and the house locations along North Arm Drive minimize impact of setback on the adjacent properties. E. Applicant has confirmed special storage needs for property consisting of two large collector cars and a 21* boat. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district? that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions* light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to aliow construction of a 25' x 36'detached garage will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keepinq with the Intent and objectives of the toning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of S CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10,03, Subdivision 10 and a variance to Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (E) that would approve an accessorcy structure to be placed in the street rear yard of the property that will conform to all required setbacks except to the north side lot line to be located 13' instead of the required 15', subject to the following conditions; 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Upon application for a building permit, applicant shall provide an updated survey locating detached structure at 25' X 36' located 35' from rear street yard, 15' from south lot line and 13' from north side lot line. Applicant must obtain a demolition permit for the removal of the existing accessory structure. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance/conditional use permit will expire on that date (September 28, 1993). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted ’.erein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title '"f the property. Page 3 of 5 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 28th day of September, 1992. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, Ciiy Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner(sj STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) 8S . COUNTY 01 HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 28th day of September 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ __ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed! the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OP MINNESOTA ) ) as. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199 . before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOtAR)^ {>UBLIC Page 9 of 5 To: From: Date: Subject: Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A, Mabusth# Building fc Zoning Administrator'''^- September 17, 1992 7 #1750 Charles and Shirley Pyle, 3548 Ivy Place - 2nd Review Variances - Resolution Pertinent Ordinances - Review of Amended Plan - Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 0-75' setback area ■ 4,075 s.f. Existinq hardcover ■ 940 s.f. or 23.2o% Amended proposal ■ 805.5 s.f. or 19.7% 75-250' setback area ■ 8,150 s.f. Allowed ■ 2,037.5 s.f. or 25% Existing ■ 5,870 s.f. or 72% Original Proposal ■ 4,253 s.f. or 52% Amended Proposal • 4,154.5 s.f. or 50.9% Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Review of let coverage Total area * 12,225 s.f. Allowed lot coverage ■ 1,833.7 s.f. or 15% Existing * 1,810.2 s.f. or 14.8% Original Proposal * 2,640 s.f. or 21.5% Amended Proposal » 2,523 s.f. or 20.6% Variance ■ 712.8 s.f. or 5.3% jEeview ofStructural Areas Credited against Tot Coverage: Existing house ■ 1,273 s.f. or 10.4% Proposed garage • 564 s.f. (original 612 s.f.) or 4.6% Addition ■ 381 s.f. or 3.1% Roof structure • 305 s.f. (original 374 s.f.) or 2.51 Total coverage ■ 20.6% (original 21.5%) List Of Exhibits A - Applicants* Addendum B - Original Proposal C - Amended Proposal Review of Amended Proposal Applicants have reduced the garage by 48 s.f. and overhe d roof structure by 69 s.f. Total lot coverage reduced fnm 21.5% to 20.6%. Hardcover in the 0-75' setback area bas been reduced from 23.26% to 19.71. (Removal of 142.9 s.f. of landscape under laic with plastic, refer to Exhibit C.) Hardcover In the 75-250’ setback area has been reduced frem 52% to 50.9% resulting from the reduction In aarsge s. se. Zoning File 11750 September 17» 1992 Page 2 paved area and landscape area underlain with plastic. Staff has amended the original resolution reflecting the new lot coverage and hardcover facts. Options of Action Adopt a resolution approving amended proposal or Request additional reductions or Denial. F A RBSOLDTIOH GRAHTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.03, SUBDIVISION 14 (C) AND 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 PILE #1750 WHEREAS, Charles D, Pyle and Shirley Pyle (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 3548 Ivy Place within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described a^> follows: Lot 174, Taylor's Subdivision of Spring Par)c Lots, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) to permit structural improvements to the property thnt will result in 2,523 s.f. or 20,6% coverage where only 15% is allowed and a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 seelcing approval of hardcover variances within the 75-250' setbac)c area where only 25% hardcover is allowed and where 4,154.5 s.f. or 50.9% is proposed and 5,870 s.f. or 72% exists on the property. MON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1750, 2. The property is located in the LR-IC, Single Family La)ceshore Residential Zoning District requiring 21,780 s.f. or .5 acres in area. The subject property consists of 12,225 s.f. or .28 acres. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 20, 1992 and August 17, 1992, and recommended approval of the proposed variance application as amended based upon the following findir.rs: Pacte 1 of 6 4. 5. A.Comprehensive improvement of the property results in a reduction of 1,617 s.f. or 20% hardcover within the 75- 250' setback area. B.Based on the existing drainage patterns of the property runoff produced from the structures placed within the 75-250* setback area will drain away from lake and into street. C.No major land alterations are proposed as a result of these structural improvements. D.New location of the garage addition will conform with the basic development pattern of the immediate neighborhood. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions# light# air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant# but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant* and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission# reports by City staff# comments by the applicants and the effect of the variances on the health# safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIOMS # ORDER AMD CONDITIOHS Based upon one or more of the above findings# the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.03# Subdivision 14 (C) and 10.22, Subdivisions 2 to permit the construction of a detached garage at 564 s.f., an addition to residence at 381 s.f. and an overhead roof structure at 305 s.f. subject to the following conditions: 1.All structural improvements shall be limited to a total of 20.6% lot coverage on the property. Page 2 of 6 2. i; 3. 4. 5. 6. Upon application for a building permit, applicants shall complete the following: a. To provide a survey locating all existing and proposed improvements. b. To obtain a demolition permit for removal of existing detached garage. c. To provide detailed grading and drainage plans. d.To provide a planting schedule for replacement of two mature oak trees. Applicants to provide size, type and location on survey submitted with application. All hardcover scheduled for removal within the 0-75' setback area (142.5 s.f.) and within the 75-250* setback area (1,715.5 s.f.) and as shown on page 6 of this resolution shall be removed prior to the footing inspection for the new residential construction. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (September 14, 1993). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 6 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of September, 1992. ATTEST: I Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Ownerfs) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 14th day of September 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson 6 Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 6 1.^. 1 STATE OP MINNESOTA ) } S8« COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. STATE OP MINNESOTA .) Notary Public ) ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) On this_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _day of _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county,personally appeared _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 5 of .. . ; -« -/: •• » % •«. »d ill Q (D O *• r • • • . • .* :•* •* ^ •* r * • . r: /*‘x ■.' % v*< «> -t ** - • •’• •• *• . • ■ • •• *• • . • ••, * * '■- ■•»• '♦ r *•*•/,« . 0-ta*«r> 'I i ' *'*■• •f..- •** • ' t». • . • •• - * '•• S.‘* ^ *, /» •■•. »••■• T**. *• »vl *r*f- •^■•‘ 'H * •.•' , T'4*«*»«-*,*J T ( ,r ..»- * . 1 ^ • 1/ * «/-V/^'i'. VT ■ -V u r • - • . r, • • •. ••• ,.:-.i:-.-T: T• .' • • ':^y. • •(H^- rttiH ' ■ 7W^Wp.. ; I Ji-^/ . .- . ••_• 'VlfHSRBglrH f --■ -sU; »’■ -^r**- ■—■, - ... - V ..i-^. - •jJ-K4i '■:' f pJ' mm A.y.’W . ■■' ■’ ■* <♦> j QmM^ J* .f* »4i« ; pg.ten£ ns^ /. K’cmtftJ t#v^p <Amto%m - K »#»>> •1“ .1* CSk£a2EE3f n> — ^’------- 1 1 1 f <r!fter .^iy /■ anJ1Wrv>Kj pMjtt'fTry^ . ,a4.^ - P*l.#nsr «> - Cbv#re - «iw» rtfrv>*4 r>mw ivf i^ -*UM» -. ' - f^p fet©T*p •• P*vy» >/r ^ ng KVrtoJ * *-^ -Crtjew r(AfS^ fVTWJ ^1 M>f7^ AtVlIVtnJ w/ r- jg»R4e<i»HiRferme . \nN fUilte oH\^, y^^, ffA. KVitl^ tt Jbije^ vWU'^t f^tc o 14. SWY ‘Tt e. W!eHnea' ^1 TVVIAfii^ hnSMt i». Mi>*JCf*e3tei-, >AK 5e4k? •• • % 4. #• •. ■ •: -• ■ V .. #»'*J..4I • • I ;;- ‘ 4. . • • • ■.•If. ..'..!-4 a'.‘.ii.’ii'k .•f.'.C. ■■•t'.**. ‘. .- i'^^ -i_!_^ . . — * * %• ^ A • • •• • . .* . • •'••••#•••»•* • * * . -■ ‘ * - /N.* ■ Dar>'l Hansen, Architects 3841 Thomas Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55410 Telephone 612«920*6232 16 September 1992 Ns. Jeanne A. Mabusth Building & Zoning Administrator City of Orono, Municipal Offices P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Ms. Mabusth, After the 14 September City Council Meeting, the Pyles & 1 have re-evaluated the project and proposed the following compromi* to hardcover and structural coverage at 3548 Ivy Place. - Remove 165 sq.ft, of plastic below crushed rock on 0-75' and small section 75'-250' as noted. - Remove 69 sq.ft, of proposed covered entry (structural coverage). - Remove 2 feet of length of garage or 48 sq.ft, of structural coverage (27 to 25 feet long). - Remove respectively affected driveway section or 28 sq.ft. These changes reduce structural coverage from 21.5% to 20.6% and proportionate reductions in hardcover as noted. We retained a little R/P at corner of house in 0-75' because of potential water problem to basement. We hope these final changes meet with Council approval. Please call if there are any questions. Daryl Hansen cc. Charles & Shirley Pyle foir ggg ] jliHESO'Mi SEP 1 7 1992 I\t\s> , 1(5 i V.i-' ,.'1 ’V 'S! N-l- iMayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Date: Subject Michael P. Caffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning AdminiS^^J^toiiP^ September 24, 1992 ^ #1763 Woodhill Country Club, 200 Woodhill Road - Conditional Use Permit (After-the-Fact) - Resolution Application: Requesting conditional use permit for land alterations (approximately 10,000 cubic yards) for safety improvement to driving range area of golf course. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Resolution Exhibit B - Draft Planning Commission Minutes Exhibit C - Notice of Planning Commission Action 9/24/92 Exhibit D - Memo and Exhibits of 9/18/92 Discussion Please review the memo and exhibits of September 18th, Briefly, applicants are requesting approval to regrade the Woodhill driving range area directly south of the club house buildings. The intent is to provide berming around the south and east perimeter of the driving range to protect golfers on the adjacent fair''*‘^vs. As noted in the September 18th memo, the work was commenced prior to City approval. A stop order was issued and the grading contractor has pulled off the site temporarily. Planning Commission Reconmiendation On a vote of 6-0 (Chairman Kelley abstained because he is a Woodhill member). Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposal, subject to conforming with the City Engineer's recommendations regarding erosion control and the site utility plan. Planning Commission further recommended that the survey work to define the boundary between Wayzata and Orono does not need to be completed immediately but should be submitted by the end of the year. (See 9/24/92 Notice, Exhibit C) Staff has requested an erosion control plan which applicant's surveyor will be submitting prior to Monday night's meeting. It should be noted that c5 It fencing has been provided in the area of the culvert inlet to prevent seuimc’^t problems downstream. This item was brought directly to Council for action due to weather constraints and the need to complete this project in order to re-establish sod this fall. Zoning File #1763 September 24, 1992 Page 2 Staff Reconnendation Staff recommeads approval per the Planning Commission recommendation» which includes payment of after-the-facts investigation fees for the land alteration peimit as well as the CUP application. A resolution reflecting Planning Comir. ■* *5Sion recommendation is attached for Council review. A RBSOLOTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 FTT.B #1763 WHEREAS, Woodhill Country Club (hereinaiLcr "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 200 Woodhill Roau Ic^'^ted within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as follows: Exhibit "A" attached (hereinafter the "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a Conditional ’Jse Permit for land alterations involving the movement of 9,300 cubic yards of earth and importation of 1,000 cubic yards of topsoil, which activity requires a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. 2. The application was reviewed as Zoning File #1763. The property is located in the RR-IB, Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District. 3.On September 21, 1992 the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the application and on a vote of 6 in favor, 0 against, 1 abstention, recommended conditional approval, finding that the proposed project will have no impact on adjacent properties, will not impact protected wetland areas, and that the intended regrading to create perimeter berms around the existing driving range area will provide for greater safety for golfers on adjacent greens and fairways. Page 1 of 7 4. The applicant conunenced work after making formal application for a conditional use permit but prior to obtaining conditional use permit approval. The work stopped after a "stop work" order was issued by City staff. Although a portion of the project may be located within the City of Wayzata municipal boundaries and a permit has been issued for grading work by the City of Wayzata, City of Orono maps indicate that the majority of the project is within the City of Orono. No justification was given for commencement of the work without the appropriate permit. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 6. The City Counv^il finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the proposed land alteration will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. rONCLDSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 to permit the movement of 9,300 cubic yards of earth and the importation of 1,000 cubic yards of topsoil per the grading plan attached to this resolution as Exhibit "B", subject to the following conditions: 1, Prior to recommencement of grading, applicant shall provide an erosion control plan that is acceptable to the City Engineer . Page 2 of 7 2. Applicant shall provide and maintain silt fence along the southwestern perimeter of the grading area and provide sedimentation protection for the inlet of the existing culvert on the site. 3. Applicant shall maintain erosion protection measures until sod is suitably re-established. 4. No later than December 31, 1992, applicant shall provide a survey of the boundary between the Cities of Wayzata and Orono in the area of the site grading (plotted on the site grading plan), and shall show the location of existing utility lines and the location of the 36” culvert within the area of the site grading. 5. Prior to recommencing wor)c, applicant shall obtain a land alteration permit and shall pay the after-the-fact investigation fees for the land alteration permit and for the zoning application. 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7. The undersigned owner has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of itself, its heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 7 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 28th day of September, 1992. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 4 of 7 \ Bellows felt that was not necessary given the temporary nature of the structure. (#6) #1763 WOODHILL COUNTRY CLUB, 200 WOODHILL ROAD - AFTER-THE-FACT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING 8:14 - 8:17 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Ce *lflcate of Mailing were noted. Rick Fredrickson and Mark Gronberg appIicat I on. were present for this Gaffron explained that the application was submitted prior to commencement of work, but due to the fact that the applicant was unsure which city to gain approval from, the work was started without the necessary approvals. The project is proposed to make the driving range more safe. The City Engineer has commented that the 2:5% slopes are steep, but the golf course maintenance personnel have assured staff that they currently maintain slopes that steep. The Engineer has requested that the applicant provide erosion control during construction, the utility lines be shown on the survey, and a silt fence be provided to protect the culvert. Gaffron said he would like to see the city boundaries staked on site and the applicant provide a survey showing the city boundaries. He felt weather is a key factor, and the project should not be delayed until the survey is provided. 8 I MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 21, 1992 1 ZONING FILE #1763 - CONT. Fredrickson noted the silt fence has already been provided, and they plan to staple the sod In place. It was moved by Rowlette, seconded by Peterson, to recommend approval of Application #1763 for WoodhIII County Club, 200 Woodhill Road, for after-the-fact conditional use permit for land alterations, subject to the applicant paying the penalty fee, and provide the City with a survey showing the city boundaries prior to the end of the year. Ayes 6, nays 0. Chair Kelley abstained. (#6) #1765 JOHN E. MOORE, 801 TONKAWA ROAD - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 8:18 - 8:29 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mai ling were noted. CITY OP ORONO P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay» MN 473-7357 55323 ZONING PILE #1763 NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Notice: 9/24/92 TO: Rick Frederickson Grounds Superintendent Woodhill Country Club 200 Woodhill Road Wayzata, MN 55391 COPIES TO;Mark Gronberg Coffin fit Gronberg, Inc. 482 Tamarack Ave. Long Lake, MN 55356 TYPE OP APPLICATION; Conditional Use Permit DATE OP MEETING; 9/21/92 VOTE; 6 For 0 Against 1 Abstention Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval subject to conditions noted below. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Approval of conditional use permit for 9,300 cubic yards earth movement, plus additional 1,000 yards of imported topsoil. 2. Follow City Engineer's recommendations: a) Provide erosion control plan (Gronberg notified 9/24/92). b) Provide silt fence along southwestern perimeter of the grading area (protect culvert inlet also). c) Provide a site utility plan (see item 3). d) Maintain erosion protection measures until sod is re­ established. 3. Provide no later than 12/31/92 a survey of the boundary between the Cities rf Wayzata and Orono in the area of the s . te grading (platted on the site grading plan). Show the location of existing utility lines and the location of the 36" CMPA culvert within the area of the site grading plan. 4. Prior to recommt'.ncing work, applicant shall obtain land alteration permit ($75.00) fee), and pay after-the-fact investigation fee for the land alteration permit ($75.00) and the conditional use permit ($200.00). Total fees: $350.00. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council Monday, September 28, 1992; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. To; From: Date Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator September 18, 1992 Subject: #1763 Woodhill Country Club - Conditional Use Permit (Now After-the Fact) - Public Hearing Application: Conditional use permit for land alterations (approximately 10,000 cubic yards) for safety improvement to driving range area of golf course. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey/Grading Plan Air Photo Overlay Letter of Request City Engineer's Comments Stop Worlc Order Letter dated 9/18/92 After the Fact Status of Application Ple^.se review the stop work order letter dated September 18th. Briefly, the applicant began working with Mark Gronberg earlier this year to develop a grading plan to protect golfers from the driving range. Late in the process it was determined that the project was likely located in both the cities of Wayzata and Orono. A Wayzata permit was obtained and the Orono conditional use permit was applied for in late August. During the site inspection as part of the application review on September 15th, staff found that work was in progress. A stop work order was issued on September 16th when staff determined via air photo overlay maps that almost tte entire project was in Orono. However, no survey work has been provided to establish the City boundary nor the portion of work which actually will occur in Orono. Please see the attached air photo overlay. Merits of the Land Alteration Permit Request Please review the City Engineer's comments. Exhibit G. His recommendation includes the following points: 1. The 2.5 to 1 slopes need protection from erosion until sod has been established. 2. Slopes will be difficult to maintain, although the applicant indicates such slopes are regularly maintained on the golf course today. Zoning File #1763 September 18, 1992 Page 2 3.Silt fence needs to immediately be installed along the southwest perimeter. 4. Existing utility lines should be shown on the survey. Staff conceptually agrees with the intent and nature of the proposed grading. Applicant has advised that the steeper slopes are necessary to control the distance golf balls will roll as they reach the perimeter of the driving range. The berms will provide a safety factor as well as function to confine the driving range activity. Staff Recommendation Based on the above information, staff recommends as follows; 1. Approval of the conditional use permit for 9,300 cubic yards of earth movement, plus an additional 1,000 yards of imported top soil. 2. Adherence to City Engineer's recommendation. ^ r ^ V. Payment of after-the-fact investigation fee for the CUP application in the amount of $200.00, plus double fee on the actual land alteration permit. 4.Prior -to—Counci I--a^pi'ov a 1-, surveyor to define on the site and in the drawing the City boundary between Orono and Wayzata within the project area^'-^ ;2-'^2-. 5.This application will be presented for Council action at their September 28th meeting in order to avoid potential sod reestabl. shment problems due to impending cold weather. 4'. » M-r'V :/rp'O - \ CITY OP ORONO - GENERAL LAND PROPERTY LOCATION '' APPLICATION /------------------^'ISiXNQE DF£ii[^jf ^ ‘f Ij ; I • •• . Avfw'V^Vvvvv* Site Address ____2^^ CuOdHUtLL fjOAi) O -J tL'VV.OV Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) jL^//~7•‘23 •"/i.VV.001^LlRT-THm YOU il2b0790 COOl ROi 707:00S/2S/9 Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name Ccc46 Phone (home) Phone (work)^7S-7JJ3 Address 2^^ Ct2^^2fAi/Ci Citv iA^Ari4T4 zio S'SJJ/ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name € Phone (home) Phone Address Citv Zio Date Prooertv Acouired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land • PEES - CONDITIONAL DSE PERMITS - _ _ _ _ $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use _ _ _ _ $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) _ _ _ _ $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments _ _ _ _ $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use '>K. $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule Renewal Fee - $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 $175.00 $ 75.00 $300.00 $300.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Appeals Other - see fee schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTYPresent Zoning District A/i. /6 Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) cou^S€ DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail: A^€a ^ jAy^/Z /«W _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obta: this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Governme: Center 348-32'^l). 3. Plat Map. 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). 6. Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll" X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. Applicant's signature ^ )t^ \ Do t\ The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff; Date________________ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. OWNERS SIGNATURE ^ The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and veri^ircticn of^this request. Owner's signature /j^ j il _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date ^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Counci.'. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, pl.^ase make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. RUN DATE Oa/27/92BATCH QOSPROP AOOR OI#l€R NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST58 02-117-25 12 0001.00200 NOODHIIL RD HOODHILL COUNTRY CLUB HOODHILL CNTRY CLUB 200 ^lOOOHILL RD NAYZATA MN 55591 58 02-117-25 19 0001 00965 EDGENOOD HILLS RD T A A C A CUSICK THOMAS CUSICK 965 EDGENOOD HILLS RD NAYZATA MN 55591 58 02-117-25 91 0009 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED MCLEOD CNTY REG RAIL AUTH DAKOTA RAIL If^C 25 ADAMS ST N HUTCHir^ON MN 55550 .i I • % REPORT NO. PI955901 PAGE 558 02-117-25 15 000900522 HOODHILL RD J BARTELS A R BARTELS JUERGEN A RACHEL BARTELS 520 HOODHILL ROAD NAYZATA MN 55591 58 02-117-25 15 000500520 HOODHILL RD J BARTELS A R BARTELS JUERGEN A RACHEL BARTELS 520 HOODHILL ROAD NAYZATA M4 55591 58 D2-117-25 91 0002 00985 EDGE»^0 HILLS RD P B HARRIS ETAL HR PHILLIP B HARRIS 985 EDGENOOD HILLS ROAD NAYZATA MN 55591 58 02-117-25 91 0005 01095 FREDA C FREDA C P 0 BOX 296 NAYZATA rW EDGEl'IOOO HILLS RD KEITH KEITH . • / I i d 55591 58 02-117-25 92 0005 00525 HOODHILL RD J BARTELS A R BARTELS JUERGEN A RACHEL BARTELS 520 HOODHILL ROAD NAYZATA MN 55591 TOTAL BATCH 005 00008 I . .• t I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATIOI4 OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEttlEPIN COUITY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNONLEOGE AND BELIEF OAT Q ,t1Yoo ^■ ^ «• '*> o'*-5 5 0: WOODHILL { 1 X . V ■>;!|S-.350 14; •• ^^Sty w m '^•1 m IM ■B r mm I iiilM ■>k. ii pi •'^1h^urv;'> .i ^'S5i'i;'r'’'' iK'SV/y'-■4i’-ir'*h*\ Wh ■piSffilliSi111:iilrr* Jidliii'i£‘';i&{k';. !{?ii; <wii r'j•«. I.* jf>!! V. tv*'IM j ' •? ■•i:":,.’- i'. plife I iuw!lIf ♦ J«!=.liricv. '»:‘fis imm L^XSi l^ill- .ft « !' : ■ , ' -4... Yn ^ vm<:‘;.5;ii •?ii.'H&;;;'MI IV*‘'-----------------1 i ■Hl'il • / ■« ' •4 -:. "; iS tdl.';f ri* A 4 —i!X ■h » »*'.iUiak mmiifa 3ClJrV,.'l :-!f< iQff §iii:i All t S' i;*i !h- *»■;■ ►Ml i ....iMSift: n/i-miitL-milPpi Jk: :iii kf».»-~',v .-■ . I.,-: T~siii; ^ ..i;.!l*L' ?''i«!.''"^ ;i-'■ikr !''^- ■'' >1« L’ i'flki' f i-»vn m SM y'M \ ,v-^ ♦T,> :iisa til];,2*>. ^yj i} 't^- '•>. •’, Ms “ .'.N ..rrv; •' t t:r arj I’l Pbyi IP‘>r|i feiSKi^.^d' l;i:M I'i R rl'f 5-1T*- i Pfiilpiifilii ’•■p ®jpfl ififlw - Jib ?*5 Jt? i-i-r. ; COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC. 8URVCYINO. eNOINECRINQ AND LAND PLANNINQ 482-A TAMARACK AVENUE LONG LAKE. MINN. 66356 473-4141 8-28-92 • . ^ city of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Jeanne or Mike ^ -.t 4 I r : • 7 « A' V \S' We are submitting a proposed grading plan for V^/oodhill Country Club. They want to lower the main part of the driving range and construct berms on the east and south sides to prevent balls from reaching the adjoining green and fairway. The overall drain­ age pattern will remain the same. The portion in Wayzata is being reviewed by their staff and has been verbally approved. Since this is a fairly simple request and Woodhill would like to sod the disturbed areas as soon as poss­ ible this fall, we would like to appear on the September 28th council meeting immediately after the September 21st planning commision meeting. Sincerely, M n y- Ir C r! K/a y/'TMark S. Gronberg Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects September 17, 1992 G Bc>r'r trevj PE W Rosene P£ ' Jc'eo^ C Andert.k pf Vjrvtn L Scr\«»»a P£ P£ Oern R Coc»i PE Thcrrjs E Noyei PE RoCen G Schu<'<ht PE Suwn M Ete^ n. C P'*> •5e''iO# Consu^^ni A GcrtX'^ PE Rcter ft P^efp^e PE R<h^rd W Poster P£ CjvJ O Lc ‘«i. r-* ^E Rcter: C Russe^t. A i ^ Jerry A BourtX>n PE Mark A Hanson PE 7 RjuI.T’arn P >J K ^ PE Thomas R AnOervon A Donay C Bur5a*a- PE Thcrnas E Ani^uk P£ Ga’, f *>e ismae^ Vjr: <>e- Pc Wchaei P pju P£ A^es NS R'-; ^ iC P Tr'-j'nas 'X ^••'VOn PE Mc^'ae? C Lr'cn PE James R NSaano PE Jerry O PpriTVh PE ‘Ce ’^r^fth P Anoerson PE Vjfh R Pc^ ®E Mark A Sea P£ Gar, \Jl' V-cren PE Oar'd J £j^e-cn PE P^ p J Cv»i.*.e. PE M.r« D Aa-.s PE V es8 Jenser pe L Ph^zp G'avd ff» PE Aar^n L X r'T^n PE f Toaa Foster p£ Aetn R Yapp PE Srawn D Gustafson l Cec» o O <vie^ PE Chares A E'H.fcvcn Leo M Pa.\duy Marian M O-'son Jarres F Enge'harm Mr. Mike Gaffron City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: #1763 Woodhill Country Club File No. 139-1763 Dear Mike: We have reviewed the topographic detail plan submitted with the conditional use permit application for land alterations at the Woodhill Country Club. The two engineering issues to be noted are the proposed steep slopes and erosion control to protect a DNR protected water, identified as Basin No. 27-852P. Tlie protected water is located at the downstream end of an existing 36" CMPA culvert. Tlie side slopes of the proposed safety berms are shown at 2.5 to 1 (horizontal to vertical). Tliese slopes will be difficult to maintain and will be prone to e.xcessive erosion until the proposed sodding has had an adequate time to establish a strong root base. Tliis may not be established until well into the spring season. Tlie entire grading area covers approximately 3 acres and an erosion control plan should be submitted for our review. Specifically, silt fence should be installed along the southwestern perimeter of the grading area that has direct runoff to the protected water. This perimeter is several hundred feet in length. Existing utility lines should be shown from the catch basin and manholes. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions. Yours very truly BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIA'IIES. INC. U 'h u4itL)ef'l Shawn D. Gustafson. P.E. SDG:lk 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul. Minnesota 55113 • 6I2-636-4600 V N // y 1 i O'o r*-'. 'i I! ><''^:r--.,v-v-,; 1*ESB0# >. !l ^,1 '■ CITY of ORONO Municipal Offices Post OfTicc Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 553234M)66 liAND DELIVERED September 18, 1992 Rick Fredrickson Grounds Superintendent Woodhill Country Club 200 Woodhill Road Wayzata, MN S5391 RE: Land Alteration Conditional Use Permit - File #1763 Work Without Appropriate Permits Dear Mr. Fredrickson: This letter is to follow-up our conversations of September 15 and 16. A review of City air photo overlay maps indicates that the majority of the intended driving range grading project is within the City of Orono. It is my understanding from your engineer, Mark Gronbsrg, that you have obtained a permit for the grading work from the City of Wayzata. Unfortunately, it appears that only a small portion of the project is in the City of Wayzata. I am enclosing copies of Orono Muncipal Code Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19, 20 and 21, which govern land alterations. Subdivision 19 clearly indicates that it is unlawful to grade existing land so as to elevate or alter the existing natural grade withou a conditional use permit issued by the Council (which you applied ^or two weeks before commencing work). The exemption for gra ing associated with a building project as noted in Subdivision 21, clearly does not pertain to your project. As we discussed on the site, all work on the project must cease immediately, and may not continue until the project is approved by the City Council. In the interim, you must provide silt fencing and sediment control at the inlet of the culvert within 48 hours uO eliminate any potential sediment discharges to the wetland at its outlet. I have discussed this briefly with Mark Gronberg. TH KI’HOVE -4->-T357 • KAX-473-0fI0 Rick Fredrickson September 16, 1992 Page 2 Regarding the stockpiling of approximately 1,000 cubic yards of toDSoil on the site for restoration, because this would appear to be a necessary part of restoration regardless of the outcome of the CUP application, such stockpiling can continue. Please have your engineer indicate on a copy of the site diagram where the stockpiling will take place. Please provide a Certificate of Survey verifying the location of the City boundary within or adjacent to the project area. This will be needed in order for final approval to be granted. Given the unfortunate circumstances of the situation, the time of year and the need to revegetate the 3 acres of bare ground as soon as possible, after recommendation by the Planning Commission on September 21, the application will be presented directly to the Council at their September 28 meeting for final action. .^n after-the-fact investigation fee equal to the land alteration permit and conditional use permit application fees will be assessed, since this project is now being reviewed as an after-the-fact situation, and because work commenced without permits even though you and your engineer were fully aware of the need for permits from Orono. Please contact me at 473-7357 if you have any questions. A copy of the staff memo and recommendation to Planning Commission will be forwarded to you prior to the Planning Commission meeting Sincerely, Michael P. Gaffron Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Enclosures cc: Mark Gronberg, Coffin & Gronberg Charles Kelley, Planning Commission Chairman Glenn Cook, City Engineer Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Allan Orsen. City of Wayzata MPG/lsv JM 9=am Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates CX!0 O Bc^^u-oo P£ W foifrtt P£ • iosfpn C Anorrt'h PE Vj".r L Vj '’£ £ Turn^ T£ fi Coo^ PE T^'Tvat £ NkJ^^v P£ Rrcd G Scr>u^^<^^ PE SuVJn V £trf!fi. C PA *^jtriiC* ConiuttAnt Engineers & Architects M, *% j J A PE KgiV, A GonJon PE Rct>en R P£ 'Jt' Pcitr' P£ Djv O O Lo^Otj Pot'^ C Pussefc A f A Jerry A Boufrfon PE K*jrf A H^Non P£ T Rautmann P£ ltd K P^d PE Thorras P Andenty^ A f A Donald C Bu^'Ct PE Thomas E ArHjus P£ hmaei Mart.-ne/ PE V naei P Rau PE Ar^nes M P*rvg A iC P Tho« as W Prf'^son P£ C 1>'X^ PE Jarr ^s R Va arxJ P£ Jerry D Pert/vfh PE ' V.:es B .ensen P£ L Ph • ? G'a've' III P£ •ta-en L P£ G.i> O K'’t:w 'Lr P£ E Todd Poster P£ M-th » vapa P£ ■r Kerrvth P AroefsonV^-'^ H Gustafson P£ p P iMs P£ 0;e#^l^.ver PE Ma^fc Gary W Dan<- Dar>'< P»* j.p j CasArO^A ifc ^ (R September 23. 1992 Mar^ D WaHiv PE Mr. John Gerhardson City of Orono 1335 Brown Road Crystal Bay, MN 55232 Re:Trunk Highway 12 Frontage Road Sewer, Water & Street Improvements File No. 13951 Dear Mr. Gerhardson: Enclosed plea.se find three (3) copies of Request for Payment No. 6 for the above mentioned project. The work stated has been satisfactorily completed and we recommend payment at this time. Upon approval, please distribute one copy with payment to the Contractor, one copy to our office and retain one copy for your records. Should you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to call. Yours very truly. BOMESTR0O, .ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Cmw Harlan M. Olson HMO:PAH Enclosure 1.^451.('OK 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 Bones troo R^iene AndecKk A AssocfJtes SI Owner Ciiy ol Qrono, 1335 Hrown UoaJ, Ciystal Hay, MN 552,32 Dale Sepl. 23, 1992 For I’criod July 22, 1992 to September 23, 1992 Request No. 6 a)ntractor 13 & I) Underground. Ine., 1351 Co. Kd. 83, Maple Plain, MN 55.359 Rl-QUIiST FOR PAYMF.N'r I'lunk Highway 12 I'rontage Road Sewer, Water, & Street Improvements Projeet Nt). 91-2 l ile No. 13951 SUMMARY 1 Original Contract /\niount 2 Change Order - Addition 3 Change Order • Deduction 4 Revised Contract Amount 5 Value Cr)rnpleled to Date b .Material on Hand 7 Amount Famed 8 Less Retainage 5% 9 Sub-Total $ $ 18,925.50 10 Less Amount Paid Previously 11 AMOUN T DUF 'll US RF.QUI-ST FOR PA't'MFNT NO. Recommended for Approval by: HONliS’TROO, ROSFNIi, ANDFRUK & ASS(X:iA'n<S, INC. Approved by Contractor: It & D UNDFRCJROUND, INC. Approved by Owner: CriY OF’ ORONO, MN At\ra,T s specified Contract C«»mplclion Date: Nov. 15, 91 - Substantial; June 30, 91 - Final Date:. l,W5t RI P 188,786.00 s 207,711.50 s 211,9.56.40 s 0.00 s 211,9.56.40 $10,597.82 $201,.3.58.58 $172,742.51 $28,616.07 Item Uail Qinifoci Uoil l*ri4X! Oiiaatlty Tci Dati! Afiiouiil 'lb Dali: 1 8” PVC. 10’- 12* d,). iu |.I.u-40 15.00 87 1.305.00 2 8" PVC, 12*- 14’ dp. ill pi.ij'200 15 00 250 3.750.00 3 8" l‘VC, 14*- 16* dp. in pi.u-200 15.00 200 3.000.00 4 8" PVC, 16*- 18’ dp. in pi.LF 2f»0 15.00 200 3.000.00 5 8" PVC. 18*. 20* d,). in pi.60 25.00 20 5(.MJ.OO 6 6** PVC sewer service line U-60 10.00 60 600.00 7 SlJ. 4’ Jia. manhole 8* dp. W/I642B csig. in place Ii/\3 90.5.00 3 2.985.00 8 Manhole depth greater than 8* deep I.F 23 58.00 21.5 1.217.00 9 8" X 6’* wye branch FA I 50.00 100.00 10 Cut into existing S'* VCP lu\1 300.00 1 300.00 11 Mechanical trench compaction LI-820 0.65 817 .531.05 12 Improved pipe foundation per 6** depth increment iu place I.I-7.S0 1.00 ISl 757.00 13 'Pelevision ins))ectiou IJ-760 1.00 750 _______7iOJ)Q_ Total Part A - Sanitary Sewer $18,815.05 Part n - W.itcr Main 14 6" DIP, Chiss 52 water iiiain LF 50 15.60 30 468.00 15 8" DIP, Class 52 water main U-875 15.W1 840 13.104.00 16 12” DIP, Chess 52 water main LI-580 20.85 57 5 11.988.75 17 6" resilient wedge (iV and box liA ■)340.00 4 U60.00 18 8** resilient wedge GV and box F/\7 440.00 5 2.200.00 19 12” resilient wedge (iV and box i-:a ->795.00 iM 1.590.00 20 5” vaKe hydrant Fy\I.IOO.OO 2 2,200.00 21 Connect to exist, water line (wcl lap)I-A I 1.440.00 22 Connect to exist, water line (cut in)lu\1 300.00 1 300.00 23 (M. fittings U1 42>00 0.85 42*80 3.893.00 24 Mc' hanical trench compaction LF 1.5I0 0.20 1.445 289.00 25 Improved |iipe foundation per 6” depth incretneiits in place LI-300 0.80 300 24000 26 C'lcar and grub tiees FA 15 85.00 39 .. 3,315 00 roial Part H • Water Main . S40.947.75 13951 RIP KF 1 No.Item Pari C - Slorin Sewer Uull C4inlxacl Ouaiitily tinil Pi ice Oiianlily 'I'u Dale Amount *lb Date 27 12" RCP. Class V iu place LV 160 15.00 261 3,915.00 28 18" RCP, Clxss 111 in place LI-370 17.00 3S0 6.460.00 29 21" RCP. Class 111 in place U-75 20.00 70 1.400.C-0 30 Sid. CHMIl w/3067Vc;islmg l-A 3 988.00 3 2.964.00 31 SliL catch basiu w/3067V ca.sting VA Am 856.00 3 22*68.00 32 2r RCP flared end w/trasbguard Uj\1 650.00 1 650.00 33 12" RO’ flared end w/lrasliguard l£A 1 480.00 1 480.00 34 Riprap in place CY 3 40.00 35 lypc 1 filer blanket SY 2 10.00 36 Sillation/crusiou coulrul fence. Mirafi "Cuvirofence"IJ-250 1.80 50 90.00 37 Improved pipe foundation per 6** depth increment in place LF 300 0.80 200 160.00 38 Mcchauical treuch compaction LF 510 0.20 641 n.8'*n 'l otal Part C - Storm Sewer $18,815.20 Part D - Street 39 Common excavation CY 52*00 1.25 6.228 7,785.00 40 Granular borrow CY 2,000 7.25 2.726 19,763.50 41 CUiss 3 aggregate base TN 2.400 5.70 1.68*133 92*77.88 42 Cheek 5 100% cru:ihed quarry liiiieslone •tg8f‘'*g*'^te !)ase TN 1.750 9.50 2.226.31 21,149.95 43 Type 31 b;ixe course mixture TN 550 16.80 592.14 9.947.95 44 ryjHJ 41 wear course niuture TN 275 20.00 333.7 6.674.00 45 AC-1 bit. material for mixture TN 47 135.00 51.5 6,952.50 46 nit. material for lack coal GL 300 1.80 300 540.00 47 2341 bit. material for patching TN 20 64.00 12.83 821.12 48 Ht)l8 concrete curb & gutter U-1.460 5.60 1.411 7.901.60 49 Rcinloreing for curb U-200 0.75 200 150.00 50 Sod with topsoil SY 4.000 1.50 51 Seediug AC 1 900.00 52 Geo lex tile fabric SY 32*00 1.20 3,175 3.810.00 53 4“ subdr.III! iK*r detail LI-800 5..S0 8(H)4,6411.00- 'I’otal Part D - Street S99.7I3..50 13951 RIP RP-2 1. Item Uoii Om tract Quoulity Unit i*rioc Ouanlily 'Po Date Amount 111 Dale Addendum No. I - Part B - Water Main 54 Casing for 8" DIP IF 45 118.00 45 5.310.00 55 Casing for 12" DIP LF 60 IIS.OO Total Addendum No. 1 $5,310.00 Change Order No. 1 56 6” DIP, Cliiss 52 water main LF 50 L5.60 43 670.80 57 8" DIP, Class 52 water main U'(.15)15.60 58 12” DIP, Chess 52 water main LF 410 20.85 410 8.548..50 59 16 “ DIP, Class 52 water mam LI-250 28.00 250 7,000.00 60 6“ resilient wedge GV and box L-A 340.00 680.00 61 8“ resilient wedge GV and box 1-A (I)440.00 62 12" bulterlly valve and box I'j\0 795.00 12590.00 63 16" butterfly valve and box FA 1,6<)0.00 3.320.00 64 5" vah'c hydrant l-A 1.100.00 22100.00 65 Connect to exist, water line (wet lap)FA (0 1.440.00 66 C.I. fittings I.H 2.000 0.85 2.000 1.700.00 67 Meehanical trench compaction 68 Improved pipe iouudalioii per 6" LF 670 0.20 703 140.60 depth iticrements in place U-130 0.30 150 120.00 69 C;ising for 12" DIP LF (frf))118.00 lolal Change Order No. 1 Chani!C Order No. 2 70 Cheis 5 100% crushed quarry limestoue a^^gregalc base Total Change Order No. 2 Total Pari A - Sanitary Sewer 'roial Part H - Water Main Tc»tal Part C • Storm Sewer Total Part D - Street Total Addeiidiini Nii. I Potal diaiige Order No. 1 Total ('hauge Order No. 2 'Potal Work Completed to Dale 1393 l.RM' Ion 250 9.50 250 UP 3 S25.969.90 7.175 nn S2J75.00 18.825.05 40.947.75 18.H15.20 99.713.50 5310.00 25.909.90 2.175 on $211,956.40 FROJIX ’I' PAYMI-.N'i’ STAITJS Owner C'ity of Orono I’rojcct Ilk llwy 12 I'runlagc Hoad Sewer, Waler & Street Iniprovernculs Project No. 91-2 PUcNo. 13951 Contractor B & D Underground, Inc. aiANCiit ordp :ks No. Date 1 lO-lO-Ul Additional work 2 3-18-92 Additional work 'I'otal Change Orders - Add PAYMI<NT SUMMARY 7 8 9 lU Total Payment to Date Retainage, Payment No. Total Value Completed $20l,35«„<8 10.597.82 $211,956.40 Original Contract Change Orders Revised Contract iJ9Si.m r RP-4 I Amount $16,550.50 2,375.00 $18,915.50 No.Period Payment Retainage Qrmpicted 1 Start 11-1-91 $52,4W.46 $2,762.34 $55,246.80 2 I1-1-9I 12-1-91 60,189.54 5,930.21 118,604.21 3 I2-I-9I 1-1-92 38,897.87 7,977.47 159,549.34 4 1-1-92 3-24-92 5,650.43 8,274.86 165,497.16 5 3-24-92 7-22-92 15,520.21 9,091.71 181,834.22 6 7-22-92 9-.'».92 28,016.07 10,597.82 211,956.40 $l.S8.786,00 18,925.50 $207,711250 TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator September 24, 1992 SUBJECT: City Facilities Update /a %''9, Representativtej from Kraus-Anderson will attend meeting to update the Council on the budget construction progress of the city facilities. the Council status and % >»"»“ KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (•( )MK-\( TORS \ ( ( )\STKL CTIOS WW Xt'.tKS 9/25/92 ORONO QTY RVLL AND PUBLIC WORKS BUILDINGS CHANGE ORDERS TO DATE Company Steiningcr Construction Grosser Concrctc/Masonry Gresser Concrctc/Masonry Stcenbcrg-W'atruci Construction Ted Mannstcclt and Son Vohnoutka Roofing and Sheet Metal, Inc. Jansco Caulking l.aForce Hardware and Manufacturing Holler, Inc. Allied Mechanical Allied Mechanical National Automatic Sprinkler Gcphari Electric Change Order No 1 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 Minneapolis Division S25 South 8th Street Minneap<Jis, MN 554(U Phone: !612) )»2 tAX s6l2i J32-8rj9 Amount $79,623.00 $3,461.00 $5,596.00 ($13,870.75) $8,540.00 ($6,975.00) $70.00 $6,054.00 ($1,843.00) ($1,672.00) ($8,086.71) $6,580.00 ($9,267.00) ORONO BUDGET UPDATE ORONO CITY HALL & PUBLIC WORKS BUILDINGS PROJECT BUDGET i ADDS TO PROJECT SINCE MAY 5th ^ [testing costs PROJECT CONTrJGENCY ADDITIONAL EARTHWORK CONCRETE 4 MASONRY REVISIONS AT PUBUC WORKS CONCRETE REVISIONS TO CITY HALL REVISIONS TO WATER SERVICES DEPT OF CORRECTIONS SECURITY REVISIONS ADD ROOF TO KENNEL ADD ICE 4 WATERSHIELD TO CITY OFRCES CAULK ROORS AT PUBLIC WORKS '__ revis 'kdns to hollow metal ADD RADO OPERATORS FOR GARAGE ADD ROOR SEALER TO PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE PUBUC WORKS STRUCTURAL REVISION MASONRY R^SKDNS to ALL BUILDINGS MLLVt^k REVISIONS TO PROPOSED BUDGET BUILDING INSULATION BID REVISION CERAMIC BID REVISION RECTRICAL REVISIONS TO PROPOSED BUDGET PUBUC WORKS CANOPY DENTILS IN PROJECT USE POLY STYRENE ISOLATION IN LIEU OF BEAD BOARD ...-.1. DEDUCTS TO PROJECT OWNER TO INSTAR CULVERTS AT PUBLIC WORKS REVISIONS TO ALUMINUM WINDOWS COLD STORAGE BUILDING BID SAVINGS FF 4 E BUDGET REVISION j SAVINGS ON ROOF EDGE DETAILS STEEL ERECTION BID SAVINGS HOLLOW METAL 4 HARDWARE SAVINGS* REC.DMENDED DEFERED AND DELETED ITEMS DELETE METAL DENTILS ■ DELETE COLUMNS 4 CANOPY AT PUBUC WORKS (^$21,000) ($5,072) ($10,516) ($2,206) ($12.129) 1$24.10J) ($2,159) ($3,468) ($2,300) ($2,042) ($1,403) ($0,850) ($3,278) ($14,374) ^10.919) ($4,040) [^($1,292) (^$14.75^ ($5,770) ill 1.350) ($1.350) TOTAL CURRENT CONTNGENCY DEFER COLD STORAGE BUILDING DEFER SECURITY CAMERAS DEFER ROOF AT KENNEL I $12,820 $2,901 $9,352 $7,077 $8,205 $3,000 $11,264 9/28/92 $4.J075.500 $100,000 ($162.374V TOTAL T' $7,000 $8,000 $69,000 $13,000 $2,159 $54,626 15^7,748), REMAINING CONTINGENCY TOTAL --t $99,159 $91.411 Pag« 1 ORONO CriY OFF ce BLDG CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE SEPTEMBER 20.1992 OflONO PUBUC WORKS BLDG. ORONO.MN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE SEPTEMBER 28.1992 jj.S£p,o QtroFO TO: FROM: Mayor and City Council nOiiiQ Ron Moorse, City Administrator ^ DATE:September 24, 1992 SUBJECT: Fire Service Contract with the City of Long Lake At the September 14 City Council meeting the Council directed the City Administrator to negotiate a one year contract for fire service to reflect the City of Long Lake's initial proposal to the City. Since then the Long Lake City Council has approved the one year contract and directed its City Attorney to draft a contract reflecting the initial one year proposal. Council Action Requested: Motion to approve a one year agreement for fire protection with the City of Long Lake at a cost of $76, 1 93.00 and to authorize the Mayor and City Administrator to sign a contract reflecting this agreement. I ^ Mayor and City Council FROM;Ron Moorse, City Administrator DATE;September 25, 1992 SUBJECT; Police Service Contract with the City of Long Lake The Long Lake City Attorney has indicated the three issues related to the police contract are as follows: 1, Duration 2, Supplemental officers 3. The termination language The City Attorney has indicated he will recommend a one year contract. He has also indicated he will recommend the City of Long Lake retain the two supplemental officers, but only if the termination language is changed so that the City of Long Lake is not penalized for reducing the number of supplemental officers in the future. The termination language is still being negotiated. An update will be provided at the Council meeting. ' 4 TO; FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator September 22, 1992 f \r SUBJECT: Mr. Donald Gronberg's Stubbs Bay Sewer Assessment Appeal The City Council, early in the Stubbs Bay sewer project assessment process determined that any unbuildable lots made buildable by the provision of sewer service, would be charged 100% of the sewer unit cost. Two property owners, who have been assessed the full unit cost, have appealed the assessment. One of these is Mr. Don Gronberg. Mr. Gronberg has requested that he be allowed to review this issue with the Council. This issue was placed on the September 14 agenda, but was tabled to allow the Council to review a settlement proposal provided by Mr. Gronberg on the day of the Council meeting. In the attached settlement proposal, Mr. Gronberg proposes to pay an assessment of $11,400, which would include providing the City with an easement needed for the sewer project. It is staff's recommendation that the Council avoid being drawn into negotiating the assessment amount at the Council meeting. Any discussion concerning an acceptable settlement amount should occur in an executive session. 4 SAMBORSKI LAW OFFICEAliomcy and Counselor at l aw 18300 Minnetonka Olvd ♦ Suite 1 12 W’avzaia. MN SSsOl Steven C. Samborski Aitomev At Law (>12-4 i9-()202 August 31r 1992 Mayor of Orono Municipal Offices P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Fie: Donald Gronberg Sewer Assessment Dear Honorable Mayor & Orono City Council Members: The purpose of this letter is to make a final proposal regarding the sewer assessment of Mr. Gronberg's lot. Additionally, we will try in good faith to resolve this matter amicably without having to go to court. First, the sewer project improvement regarding the Gronberg's lot is principally for the benefit of Lake Minnetonka and, to that extent, is a public benefit, not a special benefit, and therefore, a substantial portion of the assessment sought ought to be charged to general revenue and shared in generally by all the taxpayers in the city of Orono. Second, I have received a bid tabulation regarding the Stubbs Bay improvements (see Plaintiff's Exhibit A). I have also reviewed Appendix A regarding the total trunk sewer cost estimate (see Plaintiff's Exhibit B). When comparing these two documents, there is a tremendous discrepancy. For example, in Appendix A the cost of lift station 2 is $183,750. On the actual bid sheet, tFie winning bidder's cost is $50,350. Please provide a detailed explanation of this substantial difference (lift station 1 and 2 have similar discrepancies). Third, the City of Orono is in need of an easement from Gronberg. I have had a conference with Mr. Cook regarding the value of this easement. Mr. Cook indicated to me that the value of the casement would be approximately 25i per foot. This seems quite inadequate as Gronberg has a letter dated approximately 20 years ago evidencing the value of similar easements at the same figure, 25<;: per foot. There is obviously no allowance for land appreciation over the past 20 years. Thus, a reasonable dollar amount will have to be given to Gronberg before any easement is granted. k City of Orono August 31, 1992 Page 2 Fourth, the assessment against Gronberg's parcel exceeds the benefits resulting from the improvements, namely, the installation of a public sewer. Almost all of the lots located in the Swan Lake addition and in Registered Land Survey #744 have been assessed substantially lower than the Gronberg's. In addition, a year ago the Gronbergs could have put in a septic sysmte for approximately $7,275 (see attached Sullivan proposal). This certainly would have made the lot buildable and the cost would have been substantially less than the cost the City of Orono is presently assessing Mr. Gronberg's lot at. Finally, we are approximately $4,000 apart. This is based on my negotiations with Ron Moorse of the City of Orono, who said the City would take 10% off the assessed value which now is approximately $17,960. Subtracting 10%, this would make the assessment of Gronberg's lot approximately $16,000. In light of the foregoing and the unnecessary expense of litigation, experts, and appraisals, etc., Mr. Gronberg proposes to pay $11,400, which is the assessed value of several similar lots. This would include Gronberg providing the City of Orono the necessary construction easement to complete their sewer project. We look forward to your response and hope that this can be resolved without-.litigating^,this matter. /7 ^ 'Be^ .regarjr;/, O' ■■''k.'" Steven C. Samborski SCS/km cc:Don Gronberg Mark Gronberg TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator September 24, 1992 SUBJECT: Bid Award for the Salt and Sand Storage Bui ding \ The architect and construction manager have worked with staff to design a low cost salt and sand storage building that meets the needs of the Public Works department. Although the city received only one bid for the salt and sand storage building, the construction manager has indicated the bid price is in line with the estimated costs and is recommending award of the bid. It is recommended that the bid for the salt and sand storage building be awarded to J. and F. Construction in the bid amount of $36,409.00. N ^ *v 7 v>» TO: FROM: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator DATE:September 22, 1992 SUBJECT: Establishment of a Work Session to Review the 1993 Proposed Budget The Council has indicated an interest in reviewing the 1993 Proposed Budget in greater detail prior to the Truth in Taxation hearing. Council may at thij time select a date for the work session . 0 Jh TO:Mayor Peterson and City Council FROM:Ron Moorse, City Administrator DATE:September 22, 1992 V 'A % SUBJECT: City Hall and Public Works Buildings Application and Certificate of Payment No. 7 Attachment: Aplication and Certificate Kraus-Anderson Construction Co. Steenberg-Watrud Const. Co. Gephart Electric Braun Intertec Amerect Inc. Allied Mechanical Mannstedt Steel Northside Construe ion National Automatic Sprinkler of Payment No. 7 $18,470.52 23.301.00 20.205.00 15,168.75 10,840.50 33.081.00 34.364.00 73.870.00 10,989-00 We have received froi proiect Construction Manager John Davies approved application *:or payment of work at the city hall and public works locations as follows: Kraus-Anderson Construction Co. - For construction management services frr August, $7,443.00 for site supervision and reimburseab 1e expenses for Auqust $11,027.52 Steenberg-Watrud Construction Co. - For concrete foundation, block and exterior veneer at city hall/police building and public works building, $23,301.00 Gephart Electric Company, Inc. - For electrical work at public works, $20,205.00 Braun Intertec - For testing services of concrete and masonry, $15,168.75 Amerect Inc. - For steel erection and installation at the police and city hail building, $10,840.50 Allied Mechanical Systems - For public works location plumbing, $33,031.30 Mannstedt Steel - For structural steel, steel joists and metal decking for public works, oolice and city hall buildings, $34,364.00 Northside Construction - For carpentry at police and city hall buildings, $73,870.00 National Automatic Sprinkler • For fire protection IL 1 systems at the public works, police and city hall, $10,989.00 The attachments are presented for your approval. Requested Action: Council approval of Architect's Application and Certificate for Payment No. 7 as presented. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , to approve Cicy Hall and Public Works Buildings Architect's Application and Certificate for Payment No. 7 as presented. Motion, Ayes_, Nays •Nr • * t ,.i>'f V) 3 1 1- f. icationve City ion and , Nays APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENTTO (OWNER): City of Orono1335 Brown Road South Crystal Bay. MN 55323CONSTRUCTIONMANAGER: Kraus-Andorson Construction525 Sc th Eighth Street Minneapolis. MN 55404 PROJECT: Orono City Hall/Policeand Public Works BuildingARCHITECT: Boarman Kroos Pfisler222 North Lncond Street Minneapolis. MN 55401SECTIONCONTRACTOR/Sl »PPLIER CURRENT PAYMEhfT DUE100Kraus-Anderson ' $11,027.5200101Braun Intertec ' $15,168.7504220St«...nberg-Watrud ’ $23,301.0005100Mannstedt• $34,364 0005110Amerect, Inc.• $10,840.50 C£100 Nonhside Construction • $73,870.00 15000 Allied Mechanical • $33,081.00 16000 Gephart Electric • $20,205.00 15500 National Automatic Sprinkler • $10,989.00 CM Fee Kraus-Anderson • $7,443.00 TOTAL:$240,289.77 Page 1 of 1 PayesAPPLICATION NO: SevenPERIOD FROM: August 1.1992 PERIOD TO: August 31. 1992ARCHITECTS PROJECT NO: 1124.04CONTRACT DATE: November 12. 1991 ARCHITECTS CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on-site observations and the data comprising the above situation, the Architect certifies to the Owner that to the best of the Architect's knowledge, information and belief the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents, and the Contractors are entitled to payment of the AMOUNT INDICATED. ARCHITECT; \ Dale; ORONO CfTY HALL AND PUBLIC WORKS BUILDINGS ORONO.MN PAGE: 1 OF 4APPLICATION NUMBER: 7 i CONTRACTOR S PROJECT NO.: 4059 NO DESCRIPTION OF WORK WORK Ca-IPLOED STORED MATERIALS TOTAL COMPLETED STORED TO DATE %BALANCE TO FMSH RETAn/oESCHEDULED VALUE previous APPLICATIONS THIS APPUCATION 100 Kraus*Anderson Corv>truction S88.000 00 $40,502.77 $6,520 30 $49,023 07 56%$38,976 93 - Temporary OlFico $2,950 00 $0 00 0%$2,950 00 • Temporary Phono $1,500.00 $1,336.33 $128 05 $1,464.36 98%$35 62 - Temporary lollol $1,500.00 $424 64 $424 64 28%$1,075 36 - Equipment Rental $10,000 00 $4,329.70 $1,112 71 $5,442 41 54%$4.557.59 • Gas and Oil (Operation of Equipment)$1,000 00 $0.00 0%$1,000.00 • Travel and Expenses $500.00 $126 39 $126.39 25%$373 61 • TrucKing $4,000.00 $623.74 $563 23 $1,206.97 30%$2,793 03 ■ Refuse Dumpsters_______________________$9,600 00 $860 00 $645.00 $1,505.00 16%$6,095 00 * licensed Survoyir>q (Coffin & Gronberg)$6,500 00 $1,791 00 $1,791.00 21%$6,709.00 - Mtsc. Barriers and Guard Rails $2,000 00 $0.00 0%$2,000 00 • Continuous Clean p $9 655.00 $0.00 0%$9,855.00 - Final Clonnlnq $11,000 00 $0 00 0%$11,000.00 - Temporary Construction Fences and Gatos $1,650 00 $2,068 27 $2,066.27 125%($418.27) • Temporary Electric $1,650 00 $5,141 63 $36 23 $5,180 06 314%($3,530 06) - Temporary Encksures $2,000 00 $0 00 0%$2,000.00 • Temporary Fire Protection $500 00 $0 00 0%$500.00 ‘ Project Sign $450 00 $0 00 -V*$450 00 • Teslinq(Conc .Earthwork and Special Insp);6,ooo 00 $20,630 95 $15,166 75 $35,799 70 44/%($27,799.70) • Snow Removal $750 00 $0 00 0%$750 00 i1o•$1,600 00 $0 00 0%$1,600 00 • Buildir^g Penrvt $16,938 00 $756 93 $758 93 4%$16,179 07 2200 Steinir>gor $254,000 00 $218,500 00 $218,500.00 66%$35,500 00 $21,850 00 onoNO cnv hall A^«) public woRKy bihldngsORONO.MN PAGE; 2 OF 4 APPLICATION NUMBER: 7CONTRACTORS PROJECT NO.: 4059 rTB4 NO DEs A irra* of work WORK COMPLETED STORED MATERIALS TOTAL COMPLETH) STORED TO DATE %BALANCE TO FWBH RETAf4AGESCHEDULED VALUE PREVIOUS AFt’UCATlONS THIS APPUCATION C O. 1 • Utility Work. Sitowork Revisions $79,623 00 $70,600.00 $70,600 00 69%$9,015.00 $3,530.40 2510 Midwest $41,100.00 $0 00 0%$41,100.00 $0.00 2950 MIdtarvI Nursery $35,884 00 $0 00 0%$35,064 00 $0 00 3300 Gresser - Public Works $81,578.00 $71,570.00 $71,570.00 66%$10,000.00 $7,157.00 3410 Molin Concrote $14,196.00 $14,196.00 $14,196 00 100%$0.00 $1,419.60 4220 Grosser • Pubfic Works $100,249 00 $100,249 00 $100,249 00 100%$0.00 $10,024.90 CO 1 $5,.596 00 $5,596 00 $5,596.00 100%$0 00 $559.60 4220 Sloonborg-Watrud • City Hall & Public Works $342,500 00 $123,110 00 $23,710.00 $2,100 00 $149,000 00 44%$193,500 00 $14,900.00 stoo Manr^todt Steel $50,760.00 $2,500.00 $38,460 00 $40,960 00 81%$9,800 00 $0 00 5110 Amerect, tnc.$15,145 00 $12,045 00 $12,045 OC L / 0%$3,100 00 $0.00 6100 Northside Construction $279,960 00 $26,370 00 $53,708 00 $62,070.00 29%$197,902 00 $8,207 80 6200 Goebel Fixture $43,621 00 $0 00 0%$43,621 00 $0 00 7120 Kromer and Davis $2,925 00 $1,685 00 $1,685 00 50%$1,240 00 $160.50 ORONO CriY HAa AND PUBUC WORKS BUILOr^ ORONO.MN PAGE: 3 OF 4 APPLICATION NUMBER. 7 CONTRACTOR S PROJECT NO.: 4059 ITEM NO DESCRIPTION OF WORK SCt€DULED VALUE WORK COMPLETED TOTAL %BALANCE TO FINISH RETAINAGSPREVIOUS APPliCATlONS THIS APPLICATION STORED MATERIALS COMPLETED STORED TO DATE C O 1 • Add Citv OlflCBS $1,490 00 $1,490 00 $1.490 00 100%$0.00 $149.00 7240 Mulcahy $47,500 00 $0 00 0%$47,500 00 $0.00 7610 VohnoiJtKa RoofinQ $156,268 00 $0 00 0%$156,288.00 $0 00 7900 Jansco Caulking $3,950 00 ‘ $0.00 0%$3,950 00 $0 00 6110 LaForoe HarcKvare $35,465 00 $0 00 0%$35,465 00 $0 00 6360 Twin City Garage Door $21,945 00 $0 00 0%^21.945 00 $0 00 6410 Hoffer's Glass $78,745 00 $0 00 0%$70,745 00 $0 00 0260 Mulcahy $117,500 00 $0 00 0%$117,500 00 $0 00 9500 Twin City Acoustics $16,310 00 $0 00 0%$16,310 00 $0 00 9660 St Paul lirwteum $38,553 00 $0 00 0%$38,553 00 $0 00 0900 Swanson and Youngdito $24,894 00 $0 00 0%$24,694.00 $oco 10400LcRoy Sign ^2.530 00 $0 00 0%$2,538 00 $0 00 KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY contractors construction managers -ftt-v-o i o e-----frH)- September 4 , 1992 City of Orono P.O. Box 66, 1335 Brown Road S Crystal Bay, MN 55423 Attn: Mr. Tom Kuchn Finance Director Re: Orono City Hall K/A Project #4059 Request For Pavment This request for payment is for on-site supervision and reimbursable expenses through August 22, 1992. as per construction manager contract dated November 12. 1991. Project Superintendent Doug Revard 200 hrs. @ $37.53/hr.$7,506.00 Safety Tom Nelson 6 hrs. (2) $45.00/hr.270.00 Messenger Service Laz Rodriquez 15 hrs. @ $18.00/hr.270.00 Laborer Ralph Jendro Ralph Jendro Ralph Jendro III 6 hrs. @ S34.77/hr. 1 hr (a $48.69 10 hrs. @ $32.58/hr. 208.66 48.73 325.84 Reimbursable Expenses Copying Postage K/A Equipment Rental MCI NSP UPS U.S. West Veit Container Corp. 474.40 76.40 892.71 2.43 38.23 143.50 125.57 64 5 00 .Amount Due This Invoice $1 1.027.52 Minneapolis Division 525 South 6th Street. vimneaDoiis, M.*. 5540a Phone: 16121 332-r281 F-VX:(6I2) 332-6:39 B RAUN INTERTEC August 3, 1992 Braun Interfec Engineering, Inc. 6801 Washington Avnnue South ? 0 Bo* 39108 Minneapolis. Mmnesoto 55439-0108 612-941 5600 Fa* 941 4151 Engineers and Scientists Serving the Built and Nofural Environments Project BABX-92-120 Mr. John H. Davies Kraus-Anderson Construction Company 525 South 8th Street Minneapolis, MN 55404 Dear Mr. Davies: Re: Invoice Number 006805 for Soil Observations and Construction Materials Testing Services, Orono City Hall and Public Works Buildings. Orono, Minnesota We understand you are reviewing the invoices for this project prior to sending them on to Mr. Ron Moorse at the City of Orono. This letter is to explain some of the costs included in the attached invoice. I have reviewed the charges within this invoice to assure that the unit prices negotiated at the start of this project were used to determine the charges for the various services. We have also reduced the invoice amount by writing off some of the time which was spent at this job, since we know this project is under very tight budget constraints. This invoice is for services rendered by Braun Intertec Engineering, Inc., between April 18, 1992 and July 10, 1992. There are approximately three months of services included herein. During my review of the charges for this project, I asked the senior engineering assistant at this project (Joe Contento) to go back over his field notes and determine the number of hours that could be construed as "extra" charges associated with rework of soil conditions or failed compaction tests at this site. Joe indicated approximately 21 1/2 hours of extra time wa: spent for this project. This would amount to $1,280 (21.5 hours X $60 per hour). These charges are a part of this invoice total. If needed, we are available to further discuss the line item charges in this invoice. At this time, we make every attempt to reduce our time at the site and are performing services only at the request of your site on-site field superintendent. If you have any questions or need further discussion on this matter, please call me at (612) 942-4945. Sincerely, Attachment: Invoice fT}:mma\babx\92120\Jtr * T Ttr r-r-r^M V T* • * BRAUN INTERTEC INVOICE Braun lnt*it*c Engln*«ring, Inc. PO Box 39108 Minnoopolit, Minnesota 55439 Telephone 612 • 94 1 • 5600 Fox: 612 942 4880 CUENT:PROJECT: Mr. Ron Moorse - Administrator City of Orono 1335 South Brown Road P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 INV. DATE INVOICE # PROJECT # CLIENT # 07/28/92 006805 BABX-92-120 007241 CLIENT REF: KA PR# 4059 Construction Testing Services Orono City Hall and Public Works Building FOR SERVICES RENDERED FROM 4/18/92 THROUGH 7/10/92 CONSULTING SERVICES NON-SALARY EXPENSES PLEASE PAY THIS AMOUNT 10,598.25 2,729.50 13,327.75 poy from this invoi<« and inciuda ramittanca copy with paymanf. Torms: Nat 30 doyt« 1 7s% par month oftor 30 days, !8% annuol porcantofo rofo. ln9inoaring, anvironmantoi ond povamant consulting sarvicos BRAUN INTERTEC INVOICEtraun int*rt*e inglnMrtng, Inc.P.O Box 39)08 Minnaopolii, Minnoioto 55i39 Telephone: 612- 941 • 5600 Fox: 612-942-4880 :UINT:PROJECT: Ron loorse - Ad.:ilnsur.itur City of Orono 133:> Soutn lirowii .<0€ja PU »ox b& Crystal 8ay» .in CUNSULTIMG GEiiVFICLS Oc TaIl. ? nf> in«f! r i II? Tscnnici .-in xl 5n?lne?riiig Assistrtnt Project Engineer Senior Staff Enslnear Secretarial Service's INy. OaTc : V7/20/9E INWmet e- s 00bUu!> Pf<'JJtCT ! oA5iX-«<i-i2 J CLiEuT J lI'J 72^1 CLXE.4 ?.tF: KA Pk ^ AC59 • .SOURS RATc AiUUNT 3 ^ m J le 2!> li'l • ' o b ■: • j')09 0*1 J» jO i.7,2a 6 a • , -i»121.2S 5.7:>B d • -0 *«dB* 73 V., •3 j.:A U O • 4/ J ly3.2b 1J»398e25 MUM-SALARY tXPEWSLS r>fcTAlL Qlract Exaenafts Laboratory Trstin, LoDoratory Proctor Tost Standara or .loditiro ietnoc. A LiOcratory Proctor Test Standaro or iooifieo iaST.i o iethoo 3t Ct or D Concrete Cylinder Pracessmj anc H.ins I inj Stanaard Curing (aSTM C 3v) 6** X i2" molds Coapressive Strenjtn Concrete .lesTiiry onits- S cand.«r o Concrete i-nsn.iry on i to-St...no Pnysfcai asura'i ties ar ;* A 4..« or at I on J TY ;< AIE M*luUnT 3.' c 223. 2 . ' 9 fs.o yK i5u.w3 32 . JJ in«if Uyilnderj 3#'i ',0o 96. ^C* bamo 1 e E.Sodo 39o.vJ? cDcn 1 • 3 j 0 J 3D.b0 5-‘J h-ac'i il5 • oOj X30.oU ••4l - • • .'V x:r ^ ^ ^ Plooee poy from »hU invoke and tncludo romittani# copy with payment, forms: Nat 30 days, 1 7i% p«r month oftar 30 da. . 1 •% onnoal porcentaga rote. inginooring, environmental and pavemeiit consulting services r.- T. '4v*I N VOI CE^t; BRAUN INTERTEC ■raun lnf*rt»c Engln«*rlng, Inc. P.O Bo* 39108 Minneopolii, Minnetolo 55439 Telephone 612-941- 5600 Fox 612-942-4880 CUENT:PROJECT: 'ir* ^.on loorro - Anmlnscr.itor City of Orono 1335 South lirown Koaa PO 3o* bS Crystal Bsy^ nn 55323 iMVe OaTc ! u7/2o/V2 X.MVUiCt V : u063c5 H'JJtCT » : o4dX-*J^-x2^ CLlEUT It ; U3 72H1 CLIENT RcF: KA PK>» qrv X \ lE A.njUniT u 1 r e c t E xpens.as iACH 3D JeU'3 fat iom CoretFi*io Cas».)^ cscrs Zi •> ^X 7 • -4iac;1 35 • y ^j0\J wO5 e 33 Couprusslon Testlan r»r.«iruut or Core Fill CASTn C XU19| fFST 3S. .'.'‘v 7j.3? Sieve Analysis (fcSTid C i3b> Tnroujh N’o. sieve with fjra VO 1 i.*?a Test 35.030U 3pa vO Sieve Analysis (ASTrl C 13o) Tnrouin No. 2-' Sievo witnout Grave 1 i • j Test x5."".0-J 5u.u3 Analysis of Detervinaticn ot fltiterials Finer Tnon rio. Sieve (aSTI C il7 or 0 TPLS TESTING UEPAKT.lENT 21.''v i)zy l7,. 0t<35 7eu3 Por rlcV ( au touoo i I • and A X 2 piCKu»> truck) 2f72‘^e50 1 *P=!* rJTAL k^oJcCr I3»a2 7# 73 fitaiss sKs.s.aisaass Pi#Of# poy from thif invoico and inctudo romiftanc# copy witfl poyfnont* Tormt: Not 30 day», 1 /i% p#r month after 30 doyf, 18% annual porcontago roto. Enginooring,, •nvironmonfol and pavomont coniulting forvicot BRAUia INTERTEC Braun Intertec Engineering, Inc. 6801 WasHinc»on Avenue South PO Box 39108 Minneopolis, Minnesota 55439*0100 612 941 5600 Fox 941 4151 Engineers and Scientists Serving the Built end Natural Environments August 28, 1992 Project BABX-92-120 Mr. John H. Davies Kraus-Anderson Construction Company 525 South 8th Street Minneapolis, MN 55404 Dear Mr. Davies: Re: Invoice Number 007249 for Soil Observ'ations and Construction Materials Testing Services, Orono City Hall and Public Works Buildings, Orono, Minnesota We understand you are reviewing the invoices for this project prior to sending them on to Mr. Ron Moorse at the City of Orono. This letter is to e.xplain some of the costs included in the attached invoice. I have reviewed the charges within this invoice to assure that the umt prices negotiated with you at the start of this project were used to determine the charges for the various services. This invoice is for services rendered by Braun Intcrtec Engineerir.*,, Inc., between July 17, 1992 and August 8, 1992. These charges are prim.irily for intermittent soil compaction tests and in-house report preparation. It needed, we are available to further discuss the line item charges in this invoice. At this time, we make every attempt to reduce our time at the site and are performing services only at the request of your site on-site field superintendent. We anticipate the tinal report regarding soil correction procedures will be available soon. If you have any questions or need further discussion on this matter, please call me at (612) 942-4945. Sincer-ily, Attachment: Invoice grj ; mnu i)Abx\92120 ’Jlr . 1 li IN V BRAUN INTERTEC Biaun ln(*rt*e Engineering, Ine. P O Bo* 39108 Minnsopolit. Minnatoto 55i39 Tataphona: 612 941 - 5600 Fa*; 612-942-4880 CUiNT: Mr. Ron Moorse - Admlnstrator City of Orono 1335 South Brown Road PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, Mn 55323 PROJECT: INV. DATE INVOICE # PROJECT # CLIENT # 08/25/92 007249 BABX-92-120 0072A1 CLIENT REF: KA PR# 4059 Construction Testing Services Orono City Hall and Public Works Building FOR SERVICES RENDERED FROM 07/11/92 THROUGH OS/07/92 CONSULTING SERVICES NON-SALARY EXPENSES PLEASE PAY THIS AMOUNT -:<.-CE{VED AUG 1 1992 Pteeie pay from thU Invake end inciwda ramittanca copy with peymanti. Tarmc Net SO days, 1 Vi% per month alter SO dayt, !•% annaol percentage fStm. Engineering, envlrenmentat and pavement cencwiting aervice* 1,608.00 233.00 1,841.00 1 N VO 1 C E .1 BRAUN INTERTEC Braun Intodoc Enginoorinp, Inc. P O Box 39108 Minneopolis, Minnesota 55439 Tekphons: 612-941-5600 Fax:612-942-4880 liilNf: Mr. Ron Moorse - Adrainstrator City of Orono 1335 South Brown Road PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, Mn 55323 PROJECT: CONSULTING SERVICES DETAIL Engineering Technician II Engineering Assistant Senior Staff Engineer Secretarial Services NON-SALARY EXPENSES DETAIL Direct Expenses Laboratory Testing Concrete Cylinder Processing and Handling Standard Curing (ASTM C 39) MPLS TESTING DEPARTMENT Per day (automobile and 4x2 plckuri truck) INV. DATE : 08/25/92 INVOICE #; 007249 PROJECT 4 : BABX-92-120 CLIENT i : 007241 CLIENT REF : KA PR# 4059 HOURS RATE AMOUNT 15.50 39.00 604.50 15.75 60.00 945.00 .50 85.00 42.50 . 50 32.00 16.00 32.25 1.608.00 QTY RATE AMOUNT 18.00 Per Cy 11nder 3.0000 54.00 18.00 Sample 9.0000 162.00 1.00 Day 17.0000 17.00 ** TOTAL PROJECT 3ABX-92-120 233.00 1.841.00 aiSSSSSSSSSBIB PIm«« p«y fr«m thii Invoke and in<ludo romlftanc* copy with poymont. Torms: No* SO days, I '/>% por montH oftor SO days, 1 P% smnual porcantopo ra««. Inf inoorina. onvironmontol ond povonionr consultinf lorvkM DATE: STEEINBERG - WATRUD CONSTRUCTION INC.irivoiCE 10255 inVER GROVE TRAIL mVER GROVE HEIGHTS, MH 55076 457-2291 NV 1769 To: Kraus-Anderson 525 So 8th Street Minneapolis, MN 55404 t,-31-92 Original contract Changes Adjusted contract Work completed Previously billed Total due this billing / * •*.* ‘ '• f V p* I , P. U -i - H... vTw. *• C* Orono City Hall/Public Works S-W JOB //92-07 TERMS: MET 10 DAYS PAQE __or__L / C‘ AH Invoices valid as billed unless written Inquiries .ire made within ten days A PEMALTY CHARGE OP 1% PER MOPmi MA> BE IMPOSED fOR LATE PAYMCMT. IMPORTAIHTj When femittlnq please specify which Invoices are to be credited $342,500.00 ( 13,370.75) $328,629.25 149,000.00 ^ $138,833.00 $ io,ifr?-.oe-^^$fo.ax> cPJ (TO APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AIA document G702 (instructions on reverse side) R^CEONCOP PACESTO (OWNER): City of Orono1335 Brown Road South Crystal Bay, MN 55323 PROIECT: Orono City Hall/Police and Public Works Buildings APPLICATION NO: Three PERIOD TO: 3-31-92 FROM (CONTRACTOR): St“cnberg-Watrud Construction, Inc. 10235 Inver (Jrove Trail VIA [ARCHITECTl: Boarman n;roos Pfister & Assoc. CONTRACT I^ver drove Hts., MN 55076 222 North 2nd St. Minneapolis, MN 55401 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 1124.04 DbtnbufiorT fo:□ OWNER □ ARCHITECT □ CONTRACTOR□□ CONTRACT DATE: CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Application is made for Payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. Continuation Sheet, AIA Document G703, is attached. CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY Change Orders approved in previous months by Owner ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS TOTAL Approved Ihjs Month t > Number Date Approved /•i!*• » # .• ‘ TOTALS Net change by Change Orders 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM.........................................$ 342,500.00 2. Net change by Change Orders .....................................$ ( 13,870.75) 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 i2)........................$ .328,629.25 4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE....................$ 149,000.00 (Column G on C703) 5. RETAINAGE: a. JiL % of Completed Work $ 14,682 .00______ (Column D + E on G703) b. IQ.. % of Stored Material $ 218.00______ (Column F on G703) Total Rctainage (Line 5a + 5b or Total in Column I of C703).....................................$ ,900.00 The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of the Contractor ’s knowledge, information and belief the Work covered by this Application for Payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received from the Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now due. ^ CONTRACTOg: . .S;iT^^nBRG;^/yJi f). TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE..................................$ 134,100.00 (Line 4 less Line 5 Total) » 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT (Line 6 from prior Certificate)...............S 110,799.00 *s 8. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE..............................................$ 23^^301-00 9 BALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINAGE......................$ 19^.529.25 (Line 3 Line 6) ^ ^ By: TRACTS:[TONSTRUCTION, INC. 8-27-92Dale: State of; / ^ lefpr Notary Public: / ^ ‘ My Commissidrrexpires; m J. WATRUD ; MINNESftTA ; UNTT^ ; ___ HyCoiMrlMlonEjiplrMF«b.lQ.t904 : ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In accordance with the Conlratl Documenls, based on on site observations and the data comprlsin^ the above application, the Architect certifies to the Owner that to the . best of the Architect s knowledge, information and belief the Work has progressed as indicated, the quality of the Work is m accordance with the Contract Documents, and the Contractor is entitled to pa/rnent of the AMOUNT CERTIFIED. AMOUNT CERTIFicD...........................................................S (Attach explanatiof} tf amount certified differs from the amount applied for.) ARCHITECT: By:Date: This Certificate is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only to the Contractor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are wiihour prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract. AIA OOCUMINI C,7«J • AmiCAriON AND ( IRIlfK AU fOR PMMINT • .MAY IlHl IDITIO.N • M\' • « m\ iHf CMI«M ISSlimU fM \K(Ml|MIS inSNIWSOKIi NVINI'I NW VV\SM|.\(.ll VN T __ Unstfu ctions on reverse side)application NO: ThroePERIOD TO: 8-31-92ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 1124.04CONTRACT DATE:wet ONI OfOhtribvtion to:□ owner□ ARCHITECT□ CONTRACTOR□□SUM.................................... 342,500.00..................................$ ( 13.870.75)^TE (Line 1 ±2)........................j 328.629.2SrOKED TO DAH....................S ,14 9.000 nnWork $ 14.682.00 703)sriai $ 218.00 ■ 5b or C703) ainage tal) :ates for 14,900.00 134,100.00 n prior Certificate)...............$ 110.799.00 m .......................................... J-- 23.301.00 iSREUINAGE ....................j 194.S29.2S L J. WATRUD I f certitied diffen from the amount applied for.) Date:—----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ■ abte^The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only to Ihe f w acceptance of payment are wdhouT ■ >wner or Contractor under this Contract r.702-1*>ai I ' »ORONO Clii H/vLL/i>... . i. I'uot.IC WokKS Bu i SCONTINUATION SHEET /\IA DOCLJMLNT G703 (Instructions on reverse side) I’ACt PACESAIA Document C7()>, APPIICATION AND CERTIFICATE EOR PAYMENT, conlaininji Contrudor's signerl Certificalion is attached.In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar.Use Column I on Contracts where variable retaina(;e for line items may apply.TIMNO.BmSCKIl’TION Of WOKK1. 2. Foundation - Rebar C.B. - above grade Cone, floors ixt. Veneer Site PUBLIC WORKS City Hall/Police Station Veneer CSCHLnUILI)VAIIJE61,800.0065,800.0033.800.0053.400.00 30,429.25 83,400.00 328,629.25 rWORK COMPIfTinROM I’KtVIOUS APPI ICATION (D I £)60,600.0059,510.00-0-3,000.00-0- -0- 123,110.00 THIS PI RIOT)1,200.002,500.00-0-5,010.00-0- 15,000.00 APPI ICATION NUMBER APPLICATION DATE PERIOD TO ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO Three8-01-92 to 8-31-92 8-31-92 3,710.00 FMAURIAIS PKIbLNIlY STORtI) (NOT IN I) OR 1)C. 1,680.00 2,180.00 TOTALCOMPI [TED AND SIOKLD TO (TATE (D E E I F)61,800.0062,510.00-0-8,010.00-0- 16,680.00 149,000.00 BALANCE TO FiNiSII (C-G)-0-3,290.0033.800.0045.390.00 30,429.25 66,720.00 179,629.25 IRETAINAGE6,180.006,251.00-0-801.00-0- 1,668.00 14,900.00 ’ ALA DOCUMINI G703 • AIMIKAIION SN|) ( IKtllK All M)K fAVMINI • MAY V«H IDDION • AIA* • t> l‘J«) ' nil AAURltArj INSTIUJll Of ARCMiriaS, 1715 NIW YORK AVINUL, N \V„ VS'ASHIN(,ION, D C. iOOOt.G703-I983 CUSTOMKfl tMVOfCS MANNSTEDT Steel Fabricetors 6013 T?22 SnaER^STf^E?D □(6001704-10^ I-----j 4001 NICOLLET AVE □ MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55409 □ (612) 022-2144 L-----1 IMVOICe OATf 7/31/92 CUtTOMf N onOIM MO ® KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION 0 525 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MN 8 H •AMi AS KMO TO UNLCM aMOnCO "same c/0: PCITY HALL & PUBLIC WORKS CITY OF ORONO oomrmACT/xm mo 92-019 PAGc JU'. ■ I y '» . * r.f % total WEiG'-*'^ su« total AMOUNT S4.656.QQ PLUS STATE tax PLUS CITY TAX PLUS FPElCMT total invoice AMC^NT $4,656.00 A •' I IAPPLICATI^)N CERTIFICATE FOR PAYA^ENT AIA I^(^(JUM[NT C]702 (InslnKtionsonrcvrr’ipsidt’) f’ACf ONI Of ^ I'AC.lslo (OWNER); CITY OF ORONO PROlfCI: CITY HALL & PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE APPLICATION NO;-TAfo PtKIOD TO:^ -"7/3\ FROM (C0NT»;ACT0R): TED MANNSTEDT & SONS,INC VIA (ARCHITECT):ARCHITECT'S PROltCT NO: Oisiribution to: * □ OWNER □ ARCHITECT □ CONTRACTOR□□ CONTRACT TOR: STRUCTURAL STEEL, STEEL JOISTS, METAL DECK & MISC. METALS CONTRACT DATE: ^ ^ ^ ^ 2 CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Application is made' (or Payment, as shown below, in conneclion with the Contfail Continuation Sheet, AIA Document G703, is attached. CHANGt ORDIR SUMMARY Change Orders approved in previous monihs by Owner TOTAL ADDIIIONS DIDUCIIONS ^’►»fPd, this^Munlh Number Date‘Approved JUI. • •••it Uy: L .‘fHJr.* . V , •. TOTALS Ncl change by ClAiigc/Ofders 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM............................................. ^50,760.0Q 2. Ncl change by Change Orders.........................................S 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 ±2)...........................<50.760.00 4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE.......................S 7.1 56.00 (Column G ort C70I) 5. RETAINAGE: a. --% of Completed Work $___________________ (Column U + E on G703) b. _% of Stored Material $ (Column F on G70J) Total Retainage (Line 5a ^ 5b or lotal in Column I of G703).........................................S 716.00 Ihe undersigned Conti.u tor certifies that to the best of the Contrac tor's knowledge, inloimation and belief the Work coveted by ibis Application lor Payment has br*en (ompic'led in accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts havi* b«*en p.iid by Ihe Contractor (or Work (or whic h previous CoilKIcales (or Payment svere issued arcci paymtuils received from the C)wncr, and that current payment shown herein is now due. 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE.....................................$ 6.440.00 (Line 4 less line Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT (Line 6 frc?m ftrior Cerlilicale)................% 2,500 .00 fl. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE...................................................$ 3.940.00 9. BALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINAGE.........................<44,320,00 (Line 3 less line 6) ( ONIRACIOK: DaleiTZfetLte^^- Sfsife of: Minnesota County of: HcMinepln Sut)scril)ed and sworn lo before me tins 27 July Notary Public: My ('ommission expires: ;19 92 ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In M i onlam e v* mIi iIh» ( onirac t Doi uments. bast'd tin tin sik* tilist'i valions anti ihe dal.i t onipriMni; the alrtive applir atinn. the Arc liilt't 11 erfifies lo Ihe Owner dial lo llie besi of ihe Art hilec W knowledge, informalitin and heliel Ihe Wtirk has progressetl as iiidii aled, Ihe tjualily of Ihe Work is m m (ordaru e wilh die C'onirat 11 )tu umenis. and die Cuntraiiur is enlided lo payment of Ihe AMOUNT CIKTIHU). AMOUNT CrRTIflFD................................................................. 1 3,940>00 (At(jih ex/)/.m,i//ofi if nmntint cvrttfird differs from the amount ctppUvd for.) AKCIIIIICI: By:i:)ate: This C.erlifjcale is not nt'goliabie. The AMOUNT CfKTIFIFD is payable only to du Conirat lor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are widiou prejiidit e lo any riylils of die Owner or Contraclor under Ihis Contract. AIA IKKilMINI C.7f2 • An*l K AMON ANO i |Kllf K All f()R rAYMIN! • MW Ilfil flMTlON • AIA' • C llfW nil AMfRM AN INSfllUn OP ARnillK IS. ins NIVV YOHA AVINUI N W WASMINt.ION Of /nnnt, CONTINUATION SHEET AIA DOCUStl Nr G703 (InsUuc linns on reverse side) iv\c;i \ Ofj PAT.ISAIA Dmumenl C702. APPLICATION AND CERTIFICAIE FOR PAYMENT, conlaininy Coniraclor's signed Cerlilication is attached.In labulalions below, amounts are slated to the nearest dollar.Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply.APPIICATION NUMIhR:TV40 AI’PIICAIION DAI£:1/^>V|<^'L I’tRIOD lO.^h ARClUIECrS I’ROaa SO:A B C t)E F G H 1HIMtUSCKIPIION Of WORK SCMinUlLO WORK COMI'UUD MAIIRIAIS TOIAlcoMPium 1 AND SfORlD U) DAlf (Dt E«n %IC + CI HAIANCC TO riN»SH tC - (.)KETAINAC.ENO.VAlUt IKOM I’KtVIOUS AmiCAIION (U 4 El mis 1‘tKIUD PKISINILY SIOKLD tNOI IN 1) OK E)• •CMPUHMC WORKS STRUCTi.’RAL STEEL MISC. STEEL 1.020.00 6,225.00 $ 1,020.00 2,625.00 $ 1,020.00 2,625.00 100 42 -0- 3,600.00 $ 102.00 263.00 3) . 4) . 5) . 6) . CITY HALL STRUCTURAL STEEL- STEEL JOISTS METAL DECK MISC. STEEL $U,240.00 $ 3,365.00 870.00 s 3,100.CO 1,250.00 323.00 1,573.00 11 12,667.00 3.365.00 870.00 3.100.00 157.00 7) . 8) . 9). 10). POLICE BUILDING STRUCTURAL STEEL STEEL JOISTS METAL DECK MISC. STEEL . $14,240.00 1 3,365.00 $ 870.00 $ 3,100.00 1,250.00 323.00 1,573.00 11 12,667.00 3.365.00 870.00 3.100.00 157.00 H).BONDS $ 365.00 365.00 365.00 100 -0-37.00 . $50,760.00 2,500.00 4.656.0C 7,156.00 43,604.00 716.00 AIA OOCUMINr C7« • APPUCAIION AND aRlinCAU fOR RVVAUNI • MAY I9BJ IDIIION • AIA* • © VMIJ nil AMIKK AN INSIIUm Ul AKClIlltCIS. 171S NIW ^UHK AVINUI, NW. WASIIINC.ION, DC. lUUUb C703 IMJ • J I C7Q3IMJ MANNSTEDT Steel Fabricalort curroMCfi itsvotcc6031T?2? |5|^^ER*ST«E?D LM?rSSeWI?C *54601 □ (608) 784-1826 [4801 NICOLLET AVE □ MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55409 □ (612) 822-2144 [ TO (OWNER): CITY OF ORONO I’ROIECT: CITY HALL &PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE APPLICATION NO:Disiribulion (o;TWO (2)□ OWNERPERIOD TO;1 □ ARCHITECT7/31-8/24 □ CONTRACTORFROM (CONTRACTOR): TED MANN3TEDT & SONS,INC VIA (ARCHITECT):ARCHITECT'S □PROJECT NO:□CONTRACT FOR: STRUCTURAL STEEL,STEEL JOISTS, METAL DECK & MISC.METALS CONTRACT DATE: ^ ^ 2 (Instfuclions on rcvcr5C ciHo) O^t or,GE application NO; OisirlbuliTWO (2) DOWN!PtRIOD TO: Q ARCHI7/31-8/24’ DCONTARCHITCCrS OPROItCT NO: DCONTRACT DATE; ^ ^lymcnl, as shown below, In connection wHh the Docutliffil G763# is tilt ached.....................................»5^oo_STORED TO DATE...................* 40.960.0 0,-OT) cd Work $ 4,096.00_^--------- » C70T) ^terial %--------- ■03) 5« + 5bor ^ 4,096.00 5 Total) nnCATESFOR 6,440.00 fctom p,.o. C.rtita.1.)...............;,n.424.00 u,' ,roiNA(;t;;;::; ujisjs JO___________________ _____________—- County of: lo before fW this .....................................................%------------------------- differs from the amount ipplio _____ _____________ n.ile: —-----— ner.oi ihle The AMOUNT CtRIlFIfD is payabk em h'uaote, payment and accrplance^ofpaymei IS ti( the Owner or Contractor under this Contra CONTINUATION SHEETAIA Oocumeni G702. APPLICATION AND CLRTIFICAIE FOR PAYMENT, containing Coniraclor's signed Certification is attached.In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar.Use Column I on Contracts where variable reiainage for line items may apply.AIA DOCUMENT C703 (Inslrurlinns on reverse side) page or P acisAPPLICATION NUMBER:TWO (2)APPIICATION DATE: 8/24PERIOD TO: 7/31-8/24 ARCMIIECT'S PROJECT NO:A B c 0 E F c H 1lUMinSCRlPTION or WORK sciiniuiEi)WORK coMPinro MATERIALS KT7AL %BAIANCE RETAINACENO.VAlUt IROM PRI VIOUS AmiCAIION (Dr [)IMIS PfRIOD PKtSINIlY SIORED (NO! IN 0 OR E)COMPl E HD AND STORED lO DATE (Dr Erf)G + C)TO IINISM (C - Ci)i).PUBLIC WORKS STRUCTURAL STEEL $ 1,020.00 $1,020.00 -0--0-$1,020.00 100 -0-$ 102.002).MISC. STEEL $ 6,225.00 $2,625.00 -0--0-$2,625.00 42 $ 3,600.00 $ 263.003).CITY HALL STRUCTURAL STEEL-$14,240.00 $1,573.00 $12,667.00 -0-$14,240.00 100 -0-$1,424.004).STEEL JOISTS $ 3,365.00 -0-$3,365.00 -0-$3,365.00 100 -0-$ 336.005).METAL DECK $ 870.00 -0-$870.00 -0-$870.00 100 -0-$ 87.006).MISC. STEEL $ 3,100.00 -0--0--0--0-0 $3,100.00 7). POLICE BUILDING STRUCTURAL STEEL $14,240.00 $1,573.00 $12,667.00 -0-$14,240.00 100 -0-$1,424.00 8).STEEL JOISTS $ 3,365.00 -0-$3,365.00 -0-$3,365.00 100 -0-$ 336.00 9).METAL DECK $ 870.00 -0-$870.00 -0-$870.00 100 -0-$ 87.00 10).MISC. STEEL .$ 3,100.00 -0--0--0--0--0-$3,100.00 11).BONDS * $ 365.00 $365.00 -0--0-$365.00 100 -0-$ 37.00 "7l5(r.oo 4o^(io.oo MA OOCUMINT C7M * AITIICAIION AND ClRIirirAtl fOK lAtMiNt • MAY fWI l()ltH)N • AIA* • C I'WI 111! AMIRKAN INSIIIUIl Of ARCMIltCIS, 1715 NIW Yl^KK AVINUI. NW. WASMINGION, DC 2Vn^G703-I^J .JiL__J Tl custome:? imvo!C2 AMERECT, INC. 1110 7th Avenue • Newport, MN 55055 459-9909 - PHONE - 459-5258 • FAX ERECTORS OF: • STRUCTURAL STEEL • REINFORCING STEEL • ORNAMENTAL IRON • MISCELLANEOUS METALS • PRECAST CONCRETE PANELS PLANT MAINTENANCE MACHINERY MOVING r city of Orono c/o Karus-Anderson Construction 525 South Eighth SToet Minneapolis, MN 5bi-'l n L INVOICE NUMBER 9704 JOB:1963 Orono City Hall & Public Works INVOICE DATE 8/26/92 Customer Number Customer Order Nu^nber Date Worked TERMS: NET 30 DAYS 4455 Per Attached AIA Document $12,045.00 I r; AUG A - V992 FROM (CONTRACTOR): Amcrcct, Inc. CONTRACT FOR: Bid Packaqo No. 9 VIA (ARCHITECT):PERIOD TO:q/3j^/92ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: CONTRACT DATE: 7/20/92 Distribution to:□ OWNER□ ARCHITECT□ CONTRACTOR□□ CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Application is made for Payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. Continuation Sheet, AIA Document C703, is attached. CHANCE ORDER SUMMARY Change Orders approved in previous months by Owner total ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS Approved Ihiv Month Number -. 1 Qate; Approved Alli'i —T . ”............................. !: )'l‘.)2 .. TOT\lS Net change by Change^jD.ders ! fiiv ii'rimu) iiiai lu lilt* ut*M iJi lilt* i^oniruclOf S Kni)WU‘(iJ»t?, information and belie) the Work covered by this Application for Paymr nt has been completed in accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor for Work for which previous t'ertilicates for Payment were issued and payments received from the Owner, and that current payment shown herein is ttow due. CONTRACTOR: Anierect, Inc. — ■.•Date:8/26/92 ARCHITFCT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In accordance ’rith tfie Conir.ici Documents, based on on-site observations and the data comprising; the above application, the Arc hiiect c eitifies to the Owner that to the best of the Architect's knowlecige, information and belie) the Work has progressed as indicated, the quality of the Woik is in accordance with the C ontracl DcM uments, and the Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNI CERTIFIED. A** CTW • AWIC Allow AND C IKIIIK All fOU PA>MlNr*MAV ITBl tDITION • MA* • t 1%) IMI AMftKAN iNsrmn* oi am mimcis. ns wtw >ork avinu. sw. washinc.io.w. oc .•uii* 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM..........................................$ 2. Net change by Change Orders......................................$ 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 i 2).........................$ 4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE.....................$ (Column Ci on C'i7(M) 5. RETAINAGE: a. -IB. % of Completed Work (Column () + E on C70)) b. --‘!'u of Stored \taterial 15,145.00 -0- 15,145.00 12,045.00 $1,204.50 $ (Column F on G7())l Total Kelainage (I ine Sa i 5b or Total in Column I of C7()l)......................................$ h TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE..................................$ (line 4 less line 5 Total) 7. I ESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT (Line 6 from prior Certificate)...............$ 8. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE...............................................S 9. BAUNCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINAGE.......................$ ______(line 3 less line 6) 1,204.50 10,840.50 -0- 10,840.50 4,304,50 State of: Minnesota Subscribed and sworn to bac^.m^his . August .19 Notary Public: T My Commission expires: AMOUNT CfinirifD.........i.t............................................ .......................—m. A f (Attach explanation if amount certified differs from the amount applied for.) ARCHITECT; By:Dale: This Certificate i- not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIfltD is payable only to the Contractor nam ,d herein. Issuance, payment and acceptanceof payment are without preiud.r** to ^ny rights of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract. €’.'•2.1913 CONTINUATION SHEET AIA DOCUMENT C703 (Instructions on reverse side) wvcf 2 of2 R^clSAIA Document C702, APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATt FOR PAYMENT, containing Contractor's signed Certification is attached.In tabulations below, amounts are staled to the nearest dollar.Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage (or line items may apply.APPLICATION NUMBER APPLICATION DATE PERIOD TO ARCH'iTEa'S PROJECT NO 8/26/920/31/92ITEM NO. 1. 2. 3. DESCRIPTION OF WORK City Hall Police Building Public Works Building SCHEDULED VALUE 9,900.00 4,245.00 1,000.00 15,145.00 WORK COMPLETED FROM PREVIOUS APPLICATION (D + E) -0- -0- -0- THIS PERIOD 8,500.00 3,745.00 -0- -0-12,045.00 MATERIALS PRESENTLY STORED (NOT IN D OR E) -0- -0- -0- TOTALCOMPLETED AND STORED TO DATE (O + E <• F) 8,500.00 3,745.00 g —eOOrOO— -0-12,045.00 % (C + C) 88 BAIANCI TO FINISH (C-C» 1,400.00 700.00 1,000.00 3,100.00 IRETAINAGE 850.00 374.50 -0- 1,204.50 AM DOCUMfNT Cm • AmiCATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR FAYMENT • MAY 1W EDITION • AIA* • C ISBJ THI AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, inS NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON. D C. 20006 APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT aia doc ument C702 (instructions on reverse sido paccomor / CACts XTO (OWNER):City of Orono 1335 Brown Road South Crystal Bay, i»N 55323 FROM (CONTRACTOR): NORIHSIOEOOfBniUCnONMCl 1SI27 FOREST BUm CONTRAa FOR: RQL MIX 321 PROJECT:Orono City Hall/Police and Public Works Buildings APPLICATION NO: / Distribution to:/ / DOWNERPERIOD TO: P'/Y ^ □ ARCHITECT□ CONTRACTOR VIA (ARCHITECT): ARCHITECT'S □ Boarntan Kroos Pfister and Assoc. PROJECT NO: 1124.04 □ 222 North Second Street Minneapolis, MN 55401 CONTRACT DATE: t CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT CFIANGE ORDER SUMNIARY Change Orders approved in previous months by Owner TOTAL ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS Approved this N\onth r • Number Dale Approved TOTALS Net change by Change Orders Application is made (or Payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. Continuation Sheet, AIA Document G703, is attached. 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM..........................................$------- 2. Net change by Change Orders ......................................$ 3. CONTRACT SUM 30 DATE (Line 1 S 2).........................$-------^ T. TOTAT completed & STORED TO DATE.....................S----------7/. (Column C on C703) 5. RETAINACh: Do O a. /O % of Compleled Work S-----— (Column D 4 E on G703) b. _% of Slorcc! Material $------------------------------ llic undersigned (.’ontra( lor ccriifies dial lo llie best of llie Conlracior^ knov\leilgc, information and belief the Work covered by this Application for l*jymenl has been compleled in accordance with ihe Conlrati Docuinent^, that all amounts have been paid by Iho Conlraciof lor Work lor which previous Certilicates (or Payment were isvucd and payments received (rum Ihe Owner, and that current payment sliown herein is now due.fWMI CONTRACTOR OONNAJ.MMEAUIY NOTAirr PUBLIC MNNCSOIA WASHINGTON COUNTY My Comm EwpirM 3-B*97 (Column F on 0703} Total Keiainage (Line 5a t 5b or Total in Column I of C703)......................................S - 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINACE..................................$ - (line *1 less Line 5 Total) 7. USS PREVIOUS CEKTiriCATES FOR PAYMENT (l ine 6 from prior Ccrlilicalc)...............S - 8 CURRENT PAYMENT DUE...............................................S_ 0. BALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINACE.......................% (line 3 less line G) ____________________________________ Slate of; (A *Couniyof: (iliESVl i JTCyircsrl- Date.9/^ Subscribed and svvprn lo before me this Yh day of .V> HTl WnOjJiJL/lujthNotary Pubjic . _ __^ ^, My Commission expires: ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AMOUNT CCRIIIIEU (Aii.ich c\pljn,Uion if amount certified differs from the amount applied for.) In aciofdartce with the Cdiitraci Documents, irased on nr»-silc ol)y:*rvalions and the ARCHITECT: BOtirinan KroOS Pfistcr nnd ASSOCldfCS data comprising tbc above application, the Aichiieci cerliiies lo the Ovvner that to the licvl of the Architect's knmvieilge, information arrrihcliel ifie Work has (•rogrevscil a> By; _________________________—------------Dale: . .............. indicated, Ihe <|ualily of Ific Work is in accordance with Ihe Contract Documents, and yj ; Certificate is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only lo Ihe Ihe Coniracior is cniilled lu pjyineni of ihc AMOUNT CERTlf fEO. Coniracior named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are vvilhout prejudice lo any rights of llie Ovvner or Contractor under llsis Contract. *?i riricoMiM r,?#i • iM'iti<'*no'i a.so riKTifii *?! toil rvwiNi • m\> 11.11 toino'i • ai\* • i. vmi C','02-1981 CONTINUATION SHEET AIA DOCUMCNT C703 (instructions on reverse side) p\Ci OfAIA Document C702, APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing Contractor's signed Certification is attached.In tabulations bcloNv, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar.Use Column I on Contracts where variable relainage for line items may apply.APPLICATION NUMBER APPLICATION D.ATE PERIOD TO ARCHITECT'S PROIECT NO /2/3//? ^ A B C 0 E F c H 1 ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION OF WORK SCHEOUUO VALUE WORK CO.MPIEKO MATERIALS PRESENTLY STORED (NOT IN D OR El TOTAL COMPLETED AND STORED TO DAlE ID + E + F) % (C + O BAIA.S’CE TO FINISH (C-C) RETAINACE FROM PREVIOUS APPIICATION lOrEl THIS PERIOD 1 . 2. 3. • Public V.'orks Bldg, a. labor Finish 17.772.OC : 9• •/7 77o?.^ Rouffh 21 .2C0.0C —— • ______ . ^ b.'Waterial (^rough)’l8,500.0C Police Bldgs a. labor Fini_sh________ Rough V.fCp0,0C 30.528.0C : ------------— _ -----— ...^OT^rs.b. Jiaterial. .(rough). City Hall • a. labor Finish 24,500..,0C 20.416.0C > 9oCf^.r.9i.3JZ. Rough 85,971 .OC 1:.:::• ✓ .3.3 (p GSO*ox>..3.7-ilr? (0 fCt b. I’aterial (rough)4^..353.0( • (glu-lans)6,960.0(, 4 /ao > * i i * • 279.9S0.0 )5'3 7Af.«^i^<=? 0 /97 9^9 '^ n. ' L'>APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AIA DOCUMI NT C,7U2 Ilnsimcnons on reverse side) PACl ONI o ‘ 3 I*ACISro (OWNER):PROJECT:APPLICATION NO: 4 OisiribuliuM lo:City of Orono Orono City Uall/Polico and □ OWNER1335 Brown Road South Crystal Day, MN 55323 Public Works Buildiiigs PERIOD TO: 8-31-92 □ ARCHITECT□ CONTRACTOR FROM (CONTRACTOR);VIA (ARCHITECT):ARCHITECT'S □ Allied Mechanical Systems 340 Michigan St., Hutchinson, MN 55350 Boarman Kroos Pfister and Assoc. 222 North Second Street PROJECT NO; 112 4.04 □ CONTRACT FOR: Mechanical Work Minneapolis, MN 55401 CONTRACT DATE; CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT vc;. tc-. •* CHANCE ORDER SUMMARY Change Orders approved in previous monihs by Owner TOTAL Approved ll>iy Month Number 1 V fI . • «• • Dale Approved • « j ADDITIONS 7-29-92 . ( ' .*;%t 1 TOTALS DEDUCriONS 8,086.71 3^QSSull Net change by Change Orders (8,086.71) nuA .71) 913.29 91.910.00 The undersigned Coniraclur ciirlilics that to Ihe best ol l)te (loniraclor's knowledjje, inlorination and belief the Work covered by this Apfilicalion for Payment has been (iiiii|ilei< I in at tordant e witli the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received from the Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now due. Mechanical Systems of Hutchinson, Inc* Application is made for l\iymenl, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. Continuation Sheet, AIA Document C703, is attached. 1 ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM...................................... . $ 390,000.00 ______ 2. Net change by Change Orders ........................ ..........S . J. CONI RACT SUM TO DATE (l ine 1 i 2).. ...................S - 4 TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE.....................$ . (Column C on C#70i) 5. RETAINAGE: a. 10 % of Completed Work $ 5,576*00______ (Column D f fc on C70T) b. 19-_ % of Stored /.Aatenal $ 3iQ15 *QQ______ (Columr. F on ('i7()T) Total Retainage (Line 5a » jb or Total in Column I ol C'i70D.....................................$ . G. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE..................................$ . (I me A less I me 5 Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT (Ime G Irom prior Cerlilicate)...............$ . 0 CURRENT PAYMENT DUE...............................................$,_______________ ‘J UAtANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINAGE......................S 299,194.29 (Line 3 less I me 6) 9.191.00 82.719.00 49,638.00 33,081.00 u4.Date: Slate of. Mlnnesojta Subscribed and fworn/o heltar Notary Public My Commissiof^ mkOf/v2>pifcs:/ ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on site observations and llie data comprising the above application, the Architect certifies to the Owner that to the lies! ol the Architect's knowl*?dgc, information and hcliel the Work has ()rogressod as indiiated. the (juality of the Work is m accordance with the Contract Documents, and the Contractor is entitled to payment o( the AMOUNT CfRllFlFD. Counlyof: McLeod ’^t&-97 OeCKYOS' fA!iv»>uni.ic.n LVl Fnn rpi AMOUNT CERTIMED . V......................-------------------------------------------------------------- (Aiiilch CMf)lanii(/on if ,imoun( ctrfified differs from the ARCFiiHCT: Boarman Kroos Pfister and Associates By:________________________________________ Date: _____________________ This Cerlilicate is not negotiable The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only to the Contractor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment arc without pre|u(lite to any rights ol Ihe Owner or Contractor under this Contract. AIA OOCUMINI c;02 • AmiCATlON ANO aKilhl AU K)« IVnYMIi 'O • MAY Pia) IDlllON • AIA* • ^ l‘>ai till AMtmCAN INSnruU OF AFCHITICIS. TDS NIW YOKK AVINUI, NW. WASMINCION DC ilMKW,C702 I983 WAMNINCi: Unlicensed photocopying violates U S copyrlghi Uw% and Is sub}ect lo Segal prosecution. CONTINUATION SHLET • I*''AIA Docutneni C702, APPI.ICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYATENT, conlaininu Contractor's signed Certification is attached. “In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar.Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply.AIA DOCUMLN[ G7U.i (Instructions on reverse side) pace 2 of ^ii^ctstTEMNO. 1. 2. 3. A. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. DESCRtPTtON OF WORK Site utilities Pig. Rough-in Pig. Rough-in Pig. Equipment Pig. Equipment Htg. Rough-ln Hlg. Rough-ln Htg. Equipment Htg. Equipment Vent. Rough-ln Vent. Rough-ln I Vent. Equipment Vent. Equipment Pipe & Duct Ins. Pipe & Duct Ins. Refrlg. Piping Refrlg. Piping Performance Bond Pig. & Htg. Permits Mat. Labor Mat. Labor Hat. Labor Mat. Labor Mat. Labor Mat. Labor Mat. Labor Mat. Labor TOTAL SCHEDULEDVALUE 5,A15.00 21.717.00 40.354.00 49.810.00 5.785.00 2.687.00 4.632.00 41.515.00 4.694.00 23.522.00 71.416.00 82.964.00 3.665.00 6.360.00 4.240.00 7.524.00 5.016.00 6.800.00 1.884.00 EWORK COMPLETEDFROM PREVIOUS APPLICATION ID + E) 5.415.00 8.628.00 14,124.00 % 7,399.00 1.646.00 3.570.00 6,800.00 1.884.00 THIS PERIOD 2,018.00 706.00 3,571.00 AIM’I ICATION NUMBER: 4APPIICATION DATE; 8-25-92 PERIOD TO: 8-31-92 ARCHITECT'S PROIECT NO:FmaterialsPRESENTLY STORED INOT IN D OR E) 13,089.00 9,045.00 2,687.00 2,338.00 * ^WCATION and CERTIEICATE fOK PAYMLNT • MAY 19BJ tOITION • AIA* • C lom Ml AMERICAN INSTITUTC OF ARCHlUCTS. mS NIW YORK AVLNUt. N W. WASHINGTON D C /dixl 8,990.00 TOTALCOMPLETED AND STORED TO DATE (D + £ + F) 5,415.00 21.717.00 16.142.00 16.444.00 2,687.00 2,338.00 2.352.00 7.141.00 8.990.00 %(C + C)BALANCE TO FINISH (C-C) 100 100 40 100 10 10 6,800.00 i-,aa4..QQ_ 100 100 .00 .00 24.212.00 33.366.00 5.785.00 .00 4.632.00 39.177.00 4.694.00 21.170.00 64.275.00 73.974.00 3.665.00 6.360.00 4.240.00 7.524.00 5.016.00 .00 _____.on Iretainace ■W C703-1983 1 CONTINUATION SHEET AIA DOCUMENT C703 (Instructions on reverse side) PACE 3 Of3 PACESAIA Document C702, APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing Contractor's signed Certification is attached.In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. ITEM NO. CO I B DESCRIPTION OF WORK Various 0 SCHEDULED VALUE (8,086.71) E WORK COMPLETED FROM PREVIOUS APPLICATION (D + E) TOTAL 381,913.2949,466.00 THIS PERIOD APPLICATION NUMBER: APPLICATION DATE: PERIOD TO: ARCHITECT'S PROIECT NO:48-25-928-31-92 F MATERIALS PRESENTLY STORED (NOT IN D OR E) 6,295.00 TOTAL COMPLETED AND STORED TO DATE (D + E + F) % (C-C) 36,149.00 91,910.00 BALANCE TO FINISH (C-C) I RETAINAGE (8,086.71) 290,003.29 AIA t OCUMINT croj • APPLICATION AND CIRTlf ICATE FOR PAYMtNI • MAY 1983 EDITION • AIA* • 1983 THE AMERICAN institute of ARCHIHCTS. 171S NEW YORK AVENUE. N W, WASHINGTON, DC J0006 C703-1983 APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AIA DOCUX1ENT C702 (Instructions on reverse side) i*ac;e ONt or i*.v;csTO (OWNER): Citv of Orono1335 Brown Road South Crystal Bay, MN 55323 PROJECT. City Mall & Public Works Garage - Orono, MN APPLICATION NO:ThreePERIOD TO: 08/31/92 FROM (CONTRACTOR): Gephart Electric Co., Inc .VIA (ARCHITECT): Boa rman, Kroos, Pfister 3600 LaBore Road & Associates St. Paul, MN 55110 222 North Second Street CONTRACT FOR: Electrical Minneapolis. MN 55401 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: Oistribulion lo:□ OWNER□ ARCHITECT □ CONTRACTOR □□ CONTRACT DATE: CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Application is made for Payment, as shown below', in connection with the Contract, Continuation Sheet, AIA Document C703, is attached. CHANCE ORDER SUMMARY Change Orders approved in previous months by Owner TOTAL ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS Approved this Month Number Date Approved TOTALS ; Net change bv Change Orrlers 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM............................................$ 2. Net change by Change Orders........................................S 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 r 2)...........................S 4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE......................$ (Column G on C703) 5. RETAINAGE: a. ___% of Completed Work $ 7,226. ____ 279,400.00 279,400.00 72,267.00 (Column D + E on C'Oi) b.____“o of Stored Material 0.00 llv und(‘rMgned Contr.ii tor « ertilies that lo the host oi the Contrat tor ’s knowleili>e. iniormaiion and heliei the Work covered hv this Appliialion lor Pacmenl has heen completed in accordaine with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have hec*n paid by the Contractor lor Work lor which previous Cerlilicales lor Pavineni were issued and payments received irom the Owner, and that current payment shown h«*rein is now due. (Column F on C703) Total Rctainage (Line 5a 5b or Total in Column I ot C703)........................................S 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE....................................S (I me 4 less Line 5 Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR 7,226.70 f 65,040.30 PAYMENT iLine ti from prior Certificate)................S 44,835.30 «. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE..................................................$ 20,205.00 •). BALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINAGE........................ 5 214,359.70 dine 3 less Line h) C'ONTR.'XCTOR. Geph.irC Klectric Co,, Inc. Bv: — i.Dale:WtlQhl Sijie ot: Minnesota Subscribed and sworn lo b Notary Public: My Commission expires: liiMi ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In aiiiirdame with the i ontrait Documents, based on on-site observations and the data t omprisim* the ibo\e application, the .Architett certitics ‘o the i)wner that to the bi'st ot thi» An hit»M t > knnwledi;e. mtormation and hehet the Work has proi^ressed as tndti att*d, the v|iialtt\ >\ itu* Work is in accordani e with the C.dnirai t Dot umenis. ami Du* * onir.Mtof % .'nhilrd lo nasment ot the Ai\\()liNI v IRTIFIII') AMOUNT CERTIFIED notary public -j WASHING TO|V.commi;.'.jon -/yr : (Attach c\f)lanation ti anumnt cvrtitiod differs from the amount applied for.) AKCHMirT: lU:Date: lliis ('er.'ificale is not negotiable. Ihe AMOUNT ( LKTIflLD is pavable onlv to thi* Cuintractor named horein Usuance*. payment and acceptance ot pa\ment are without f)fejudu e to anv ru;lils of the (jwner or Conif.ii tor under this Contra»!. i #v* ■< ‘i ■■« Ul iHKUMlsi • ^rriu MU n woiikiau \u jk i'wmim • m w oiiiun * %i\ • ♦ *1 ♦ I j • - • . ♦ ♦ I, , . • , I t . , imi r,Tin •'v,4 r' mmmtiKtuKu MulUCir ALJOBNAME 0it»HARTELECTRIC DATE iNVOiCt I\|00!>-20--y2 1S734 r KI xm US Cuii-iT» r •J25 B EIGHTH BTEEET HINI>ir::M''>uLIB IlM 3600 LA BORE ROAD ST. PAUL. MN 55110 PHONE (612) 484-4900 FAX (612) 484-2248 TERMS: NET 30 DAYS J r •Xii li J'Hi* 57 d5f«rrLlu^TIOi>i NC* 7rS££ ftrruK'^TICft ChTl WA\U««W 4«A« A4»W x«^A.«*I K •'•^C.«i j/v^r.-x iV‘VZv/52 rcKIO-j 1y^'VX/7i lU V->/di/T4 ^ tiU ^ Vx 1^ ;vVd r %. ^ «-r,. i • • ‘ •lV‘ B.. ^-<.r S' *» '‘1 h ■f! JH' u i,.« L' I i’'t t :'f N;' H E c u c F y H mi2Ci€ZijLcIp fCr.K CCiirL&icj lyTrtL CGr.rt£T£v D« Ji.v:£ Rs5 iiL-<b«I EH j£SC OF ’fCAs vintuE r^vIOuS i« I r SiOk rttTL UftTp ••Tu FIN c*C?v L % V w • V 0 0 % y * V li 9|0C0 S|OCO 0 0 3,vOC • • • ivy • y V riGoILxZiiTxOii L 0 « V 0 0 • V 0 0 ii x9)0%A^13|?C0 » V m V ia,30C 100 0 0 T3f OWiRV L V 0 • V 0 • V 0 0 0 H iyW 7cv • V m V 750 42 1,050 • y 5GvICt L ii,rvw W A • « 0|CW 3^c-C0 y •« • f,^ 0m 3,200 • V ;— • (• # - dV|7W 13,527 7|33C‘• y 22,277 74 2,023 • V rlXTuFiB L «« ^ •• V V 0 • y y 12,200 0 fi C*f •• V 0 y 0 24,300 0 • ft* •cun u 24«i3o x2,iCO X I*AK/0 x3,b^3o x0,032 0 > • • J|X‘A- • 1 • • |T^0 2,440 • • •t.3,crO V iiuTCRs L xO|b00 • V 2«6!w y 2,^XO x3,t30 • y .*1 OfSw V • X ,v^V ii500 m •4,200 % y • • • •• « LCVX<A9 L 0|7w • \J iCfO V x^X 2,2*00 m y ik tH 5|7CO • V • • •0 ^ Ai •3 7,400 • y rISE nufti U i»:rv •• V y y « y 1,730 m y •w C V m y • y 2,200 0 SSMUlf L • • •.•• V 2Cv 0 A • • L'JJ m m 200 0 t Zr^ovG * \}XfWvA 0 XfOOC «• Cr 22,200 0 SCiiw a t^TEH w 7 t2 m \t • V y 0 • y 7?2 0 M xt2C0 m 0 V/0 0 • V x,200 0 CdiiSiftlCHUgifi »u 3,?w * W 250 V 230 5 3,250 m y M ifo7v • V 2S/0 250 • • XO x,b20 0 1 alTE L SfSw •w 3Cv 0 * * •f 2,200 V i,4»* \/230 m y 4%V 17 1,200 • y r^GE 27 ? 4?,3i7 22,450 • V 72,2o7 207,133 m •1 CG>«TRiic7 iMjiifT 275,-fOCr «. 0 72f2o/ 207,133 0 ^ - I, ■ ’► 1 • [i^> ,'V r** »1^/ AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO ¥ 1612 94th Lane N.L • Blaine, Minnesota 55434 • (612)7844902 • FAX 784-5787 Toi¥8K0S MIDraSON (X)N5TRUCnON ATTN: JOHN CAVIES 525 SOOIR BXOIH STREET NIN«M>GLISr W 55404 CATB: 08-24-92 Invoice # 8383 JOb « U904/0285 Phone I 332-7281 For The Period Fran 08-01-92 Tb 09-01-92 Inclusive PARTIAL Request No. 1 RBzGRONO aTT BAIVPUBLIC 1CRKS - CBCtSOL BAY,HC’C item no Description Contract fdeted to Previously Pat This % date ooDDleted Bstisste 11 12 •3 44 #5 «6 #7 #8 ntterisl,Including Taxes Design Isbor 6 Exp. Pafariostion labor Freight Installation Labor 6 Exp. Permits 6 Bonds SUboontract 6 Purdiases Total All Change Orders 18400.00 6100.00 3700.00 220.00 16470.00 1200.00 500.00 6580.00 30% 70% 30% 50% 100% 5520.00 4270.00 1110.00 110.00 0.00 1200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Contract Totals : 113170.00 lizio.gu 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5520.00 4270.00mo.oouo.oo 0.00 1200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ^00 12210.00 «1 «2 13 CHANSB GRDBiS leZZANZMB BDANSION NXXIFy BBAOBR INSinunOIAL HEADS CBANZ OREBR TOTAI4 5645.1 840.1 95.1 6580.00 Qriginsl Contract Awount Additions To Date Revised Contract Amount Contract Su 46590.00 6580.00 53170.00 TOTAL QOMPKEIBO TO DATE PIBVIOUB BILLINgS PIBVIOUB BIAIMAS UNT STATUS I t 12210.00 0.00 0.00 nos APPLICATION FOR PAYNENT I£SS ISTAimGB ICT MOUNT THIS PAYMENT 12210.00 1221.00 10989.00 e************************************************************************** 12210.00_^^__JpTAL AHQUNT EARIBD TO DATE idCSiVcaOEAL AMOUNT RBTAIICD TO DATE r AUG 5 1992 TOTAL PEMA1NIN5 TO B BIUED NET 30 DAYS PEBOTY 1.5% 8 10% U21.00 40960. IlEASE PAY FROM THIS 080108 IMI • -y; ‘ • ''4 . te.- •• • •»- 1 M'’ ■i ■ !' ■J]w i: •f' Ev tV V Hi :J': ■*l i: fc V Ir rii ISV. \ »» /• -^*1 'f Ifv'^. 1 f'» .-r'*V '‘liI >< ' 'f’ r'.l' r >' ■nL.* KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CONTRACTORS & CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS ___________ MEimi September 4, 1992 City of Orono P.O. !?ox 66, 1333 Brown Roid S. Crystal Bay, MN 55423 Attn: Mr. Tom Kuehn nnance Director Orono City Hall K/A Project #4059 RCttlMt fQr PATBCPt This request for payment is for construction management services of Or Hall, as per the contract for the month of August 1992. • I •City Amount Due: S7.443.00 525 South 8th Street. MInneapollj, M\ 55404 Phone:(612)332-2281 FAX: (612) 332-8739 Equal Opportunity Employer p§ Mil'L_ i.i.r™ ' i. «i*a 17 TO:Mayor and City Council fROH:Ron Mootse, City Administrator % DATS:September 25, 1992 SUBJECT: Request for Payment - Boarman and Associates ItP I The Boarman Associates invoice for architectural services for the month of July, 1992 is in the amount of $23,975.06. Payment of this invoice leaves a balance of $35,398.18 to be paid on the total architectural fee of $284,767. The outstanding balance is 12% of the total fee. a __J V' I ¥ K TO: FROM: DATE: Ron Moorse, City Administrator Dorothy Hallln, City Clerk /8 September 23, 1992 . % 80BJBCT: Appointment of Election Judges for General Election • November 3, 1992 State Statute 204B.21, Subd. 2 states that the City must appoint election judges for the upcoming general election 2S days prior to the election. I have prepared the attached resolution listing the names of qualified persons who have indicated their willingness to serve as election judges at the general election November 3, 1992. It is requested the Council adopt the attached proposed resolution at their September 28r 1992 meeting. \ ■A ■h % A RB80L0TI0M APPOINTING BLBCTION JUDGES FOR THE GENERAL BLBCTION TO BE HELD NOVEMBER 3, 1992 BE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to Minnesota Election Laws 204B.21, Subd. 2 the following persons are appointed as election judges for the General Election to be held November 3, 1992. A1 Ackermann Phyllis Andersen Wilbur Andersen Vernice J. Berg Beverly Bloomberg Bernadine Cox Bonnie David Norma Jean Dickey Patricia Drummond Denise Duenow Ruth Eisinger Betty Bkeberg val Elliott Barb Ericson Eleanor Ferril Dorothy Pinkelstein Wanda Fischbach Carole Frommelt Arliss Gadbaw Barbara Garcia Ruth Garlock Marjorie Gasch Kathleen Gossman Jan Johnson Rose Madden H. Monica Navratil Eileen Nicholls Christine Peasley Marni R. Platteter LouAnn Powell Dorothy Rauschendorfer Jan Reese Joyce Shemanek Ruby Si ford Cherry Stubbs Helen Toward william Toward Ken Turnham Lucy Yogerst Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held September 28, 1992. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk I n TOS FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorser City Administrator September 22, 1992 r., ' SUBJECT: Amendment of Fee Ordinance to Add Two New Fees 1.Brush Disposal Fee The Council recently approved a fee of $3.00 per cubic yard for the disposal of brush at the City's brush disposal site. The fee ordinance needs to be amended to include the new brush disposal fee. 2.Topographic Mapping Fee The City recently completed the process of topographic mapping for the northern l/3rd of the City. The cost was approximately $50,000 or $8.00 per acre. The information is now available to the general public. Staff is recommending the fee for topographic information be set at $10.00 per acre. This is similar to what other cities in the area, such as Wayxata and Maple Grove, charge for their topographic Information. Council Action Requested. Motion to amend the fee ordinance to include the $3.00 per cubic yard brush disposal fee and the $10.00 per acre topographic mapping fee. *! PT- k ORDINANCB NOHBBR , SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 99, SECOND SERIES, ADOPTED NOVEMBER 25, 1991 ENTITLED ”1992 FEE SCHEDULE” The City Council of the City of Orono ordains. Ordinance No. 99, Second Series adopted November 25, 1991 and entitled ”An Ordinance Adopting the 1992 Fee Schedule” is hereby amended by adding: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT NISCELLANEOOS CHARGES Brush Drop Off Fee $ 3.00 per cubic yard 1.00 minimum fee LICENSES AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES Zoning Department Administered ZONING DEPARTMENT d6cUM^NTS Topographic Information S 10.00 per acre This ordinance amendment shall be published in the Laker and Pioneer Newspaper and shall be effective the week of October 5, 1992. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this 28th day of September, 1992. ATTEST:Baroara A. Peterson, Mayor Dorothy N. Hallin, City Clerk Published in the Laker and Pioneer Newspapers the week of October 5, 1992. TO* FROM: Ron Moorsef City Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works. Director City Ofin 9 9q DATE*September 23, 1992 SUBJECT* Performance Evaluation Scott Oberaigner On October 22, 1990 Scott Oberaigner began employment as a maintenance worker in the Public Works Department. Scott now qualifies for Step 3 of Level 5 of the Compensation Plan. Scott has performed very well and has a good attitude. I recommend adjusting Scott's hourly rate to Step 3 of Level 5 of the Compensation Plan effective October 22, 1992. *■ ■U y? ^ '; c^\ LIST OP LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAI^^ ,♦ .: h FOR MEETING OP September 28, 1992 ‘. Septic System Installer - Quickway Exc Route 2,'Box 3 Rockford, MN ’ One Day Set Up Permit -Minnetonka Center for the Arts 2240 North Shore Drive Holiday House November 19, 1992 ’ *' 6-10 P.M. CITY of ORONO SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERS (6X2) 473-73S7 “CBN®* APPLICATION Post office Box 66 Crystal Bay» MN 55323 All Questions must be answered. License fee, bond, certificate of i^Aurance, tSS evidence of MPCA Certification must be attached. All applications are subject to a ten (10) day approval period. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 41 Business phone ^^77^ SO*7 ^7 Residence phone - - - - - - - Business address Name of applicai^or company represe^ative holding MPCA certification ^ ,- — Type of certification held: Installer ofii-e evnirat.lon date ______ Pumper you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? ifg 5 Most recent year Have you ever had a license revoked? Where? ______________________________— aJ 0 When? Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yes Do you pump out septic tanks? Yes No No y 13H5L 01 SEN 50.C0 OKX — 150.50 SUBMITTALS RBQOIRBDs RECEiPT-vm rm it2Si7io ceoi m X 1. $50.00 License application fee. «« -t/pX* “1C 2. $2000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Crono as obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accepted. 3, $50-100-300,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance. Copy of current MPCA Certificate. LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED List persons other than applicant who are authorized by you to apply for permits under your license __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ■ - - -- The undersigned hereby makes application to the City Minnesota, for a license to install and repair and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws of the State or Minnesota and the Ordinances of the Citp^ of Oronor Date O - If ^ Applicant's Signature _( CITY USE ONLY Staff recommendation Approval Reason for denial: _ _ Denial Date City Council Action Date Date license mailed _ _ Approved Denied Date; To: Fron: Subject: September 15, 1992 City Administrator Ron Moorse Chief of Police Stephen X. Sullivan One Day "Set Up" Permit I have reviewed the application by the Minnetonka Center for the Arts located at 2240 North Shore Drive for their annual "Holiday House" on 11/19/92. I have no objection to the issuance of this permit. f PHON^ $12-296 61S9 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY M/A<#ArbML/» I LIQUOR CONTROL DIVISION EVENTV^ " _ 333 SIBLEY • ST. PAUL. MN S5101 /fc,«c*AYDATE: APPLICATION FOR CONSUMPTION AND DISPLAY ISET UPI^EHMIT^’^^’^*'" ONE DAY PERMIT PEE iffMW $25.00 IP NAMi AMD AODAiSS SHOWN ANf NOr CONIICCT. MAKf CHANGCS IN t^ACSS 9f LOW CITY OF NOTE: ALL CLUB ‘ON-SALE* INTOXICATING UQUOR LICENSEE'S ARE EXEMPT AB9H«««M« N«m« iDvtlfMtt. PSPlMBfSHlB, COfBBPBllTi^ miM I tip 0(i.i NAtg if’OM Gtn feA 4»#L f HoUif iBMBtt fMMI AAWPM W NutitABP ----i - .. _ m-b.a v'l. f ot 6aa " KIoA^U 5C^lftft■l£ l^ninrTTff Nftf b TD ih Iwm — CHW MtWBfM ^ftgcio A. _ ______ /VTlAfNgStt^ Tvm BI SmbUmb (U«M(P BK.t Hg/YAR^Dl’iSj SIBIP ”■'f«B C«MB SS3^l m ^ ~ — — — ^ ^ ' —w- w - 'V — V - • f CoP>muMi‘V\i A(L^ Q,givil6A- Oi MlABfp V •4 APPLufXT Opm OAIOINA :ATim i>r AtNCWAuCi TMAPlSrtAQ ♦FTIttRf ol IIMBBtPP V \ AMBMBtOvNIM _ V I *■ T MAS ON TO this BUSlNCt #6nbI4 ciciHstAi ^A mc an B ouIinc II tNA di na A*' PDN A Pimic ■UtlNiU! 1 ImA^V ftVQbiUCJLCi li‘S'fke<veV\CftG?Llhft. IjiAi/tivift 1^|i6Mjul ^/ice Sfe£5ickAi+fitekicVx Ca £ifL liA {i^MTJYiA abbpbw T b Wfe? SpAjV>K Ki U 1^. 1 1 ..rATICLOB’^ 0 ------------ 1 llBit C<«B bifSAUBB TA bw AIP b I iwBNBBtdf A bbbm BI wt 6m%YninBBilfBB •tButfBmanH 1 Al ISBSBBt OaoPPB# <H Nbp Mb B* OmCNlBRflBidilBix LocNtfS ^ tl««B Or^icBP/OWBCtBf ^Bmo" CIn A OHifBP/DMPCfBP PIBNIB A4#«mi ABA iBM M»» appHcani; II p«r|n«fthip. any parintr; it ccKporaiion. any ollicar or dlractor; If club. ar>y club ofUctr or diractor. t«tr HadaHctuMundar ihaMinncfoia Liquor CorMtol Act revoked or impended or been convicted lor any viotolion of Slate Lanri or local ordinancti; If lo, give dale aruj detailt ._ I N#*PAt IN#I ll*B •*• MUB •! OMM hnOMlfdBP uBNP*%l§nd |T»BI tRf A*****f ®* Ib **# i<b*0*»^BlMM» B* ihB lB*Hi*# IB SH b BB*IMBA| In IwBMIIbb CBAMiiBiBt CBMft Ib * «tvNCBI«BA b « «A i« MBPiMt ANV BINMlf iSSUtO HtNIEUNOf N QOtS WT AtiOW TMf SAL| OP INTOHICAf INC tlQUON. NO CONSlOENATION WILL 6E GIVEN TO THIS APPLICATION UNLESS APPNOVED A$ PNOVIOED BELOW IP THE BUSINESS IS LOCATED IN A COUNTY ^B«B«BB • C*<»NBB«gB# CBM<«1v ilB**B 9* B*B««%«r«ldtr«« 0*1^ If THE BUSINESS IS LOCATED IN A MUNICIPALITY Appl 1 |i>< - CBB^C'I Yib MABBI bp ABBfttB««l#MoB rtwiiAN S^tttfiB - A biii «(»«b # A^feMi a g- /jv 9^ If A CLUB ArtACH A COPY OP THC CONSTITUTION ANO BVLAWS OP THC CLUB ANO A CURRCNT LIST OP MEMBCns. CASH CHICK ----------------ttft. -(»‘.oc>pfrv-AND AOOW** *"*.^Kt. MAKt CMANCtS INtvw ■f :iS, Mm'. ai mM 4 '# m 272014 272074272074272074 !7|07472074272074 272070272070hfsst PU'- [i^^■ ■ . ORONOATE AMOUNT00/22/02 70.0470.04 •00/22/02 33.001.0033.001.00 *00/22/02 7.050.0000/22/02 3.100.5010.040.50 •00/22/02 375.02375.02 •00/22/02 02.7002.70 •00/22/02 40.5300/22/02 40.5200.05 • 00/22/02 31.20 31.2000/22/02 31.20 00/22/02 31.2000/22/02 31.20 150.00 • 00/32/02 3.323.0000/22/02 12.401.0200/22/02 2.445.0200/22/02 15.003.0000/22/02 751.5000/22/02 712.30 34.037.10 • 00/22/02 2.520.1200/22/02 2.521.1300/22/02 5.050.2500/22/02 5.050.25 CHECK REQISTCRVENDORALL STAR ELECTRICALLIED MECHANICALAMERECT INC AMERECT INCANCHOR PARERAUQIES NOBILE CHEFASPLUND COFFEE ASPLUND COFFEE ASCOH MAILING ASCOM NAILING ASCON MAILING ASCOM MAILING ASOOM MAILING BONCSTROOBONESTROOBONESTROOBONESTROO BONESTROOBONESTROO ROSENC BRAUN INTERTEC ENG BRAUN INTERTEC ENG BRAUN INTERTEC ENG BRAUN INTERTEC ENG ITEM DESCRIPTION REPAIR LOT 00-20-02 PAGEACCOUNT NO. XNV. 0 P.O. 0 MESSAGE 01-4233-240-42PL80/HTG/VENT0 25-4520-404-00INSTALL/ERECT STEEL INSTALL/ERECT STEEL 25-4520-410-0025-4520-403-00PAPERCOFFEE/SANDWICHSCOFFEECOFFEE CONSTR MAT TESTS CONSTR MAT TESTS CONSTR NAT TESTS CONSTR MAT TESTS 01-1201-000-0074-4002-501-0401-4302-030-1201-4302-174-33 SYSTEM MTR RENTAL 01-4321-030-12SYSTEMMTR RENTAL 01-4321-000-15SYSTEMMTR RENTAL 01-4321-174-33SYSTEMMTR RENTAL 01-4321-240-42SYSTEMMTR RENTAL 73-4321-500-02 25-4305-401-0025-4305-402-0025-4305-403-0025-4305-404-00 •••-CKS•••-CK8•••-CKS•••-CKS•••-CKS •••-CKS ***-CKO ASNASN ASN ENG JULY ENG JULY ENG JULY 01-1200-000-00 23-1200-000-00 25-1200-000-00ASNENG JULY 20-1200-000-00 TASNENG JULY 72-1200-000-00ASNENG JULY 73-1200-000-00 •.r•■•-CKS 67.71ft • • t « •272248 09/22/92 20,205.0020,205.002722SOOi/22/92 55.0055.002/2275 09/22/92 1,285 5227227509/22/92 130.7627227509/22/92 502.0027227509/22/92 251.002.149.2127230109/22/S2 13.8713.67 272334 09/22/92 118.97 272334 09/22/92 111.96 237.63 37236«09/22/92 7.443 00 272338 09/22/92 11.027.52 11.470.52 272435 09/22/92 4.370 55 4,370.55 27243?Of/2;/92 24.617,25 26,687 25 tiiitft 01/22/92 1194 10 272438 09/22/92 i.l9j 58 2,087 66 ft ft t ft ft ft 872441 Ot/22/92 35 OO Of-2|-|2 p/^Q£ ^‘CCOW HO, ,NV . H O. .7«-4342*550-#3 5 • 4 5 2 0 - 41 4 . OQi01-4151.069-1501-4151-1:9-3 ’01-4151-1M-1301-4191-249-4:1212-000-0001-421001-421001-421081*4210-Cl-4210-01*4210.*03»*12•059-14069-15129-31lM-33249-42'01-4291-24$.43 81-4291-12$.II 0|-«152-lH.i| •l*49?0.t|f.]| 272638 08/22/92 56.3656.36 *PRAIRIC OFFSET PRINTING 01-4322-039-12II ii i i i272862 09/22/92 63 00-REED VENDING CANDY & CIQS 74-4802-591-9427266209/22/92 63.00 REED VENDING CANDY & CIGS 74-4802-591-9427266209/22/92 79.80 79 80 ft REED VENDIN'^CANDY & CIGS 74-4802-591-94A * i * ii2726691 09/22/92 11 96 RITZ CAMERA DEVELOP FILM Oi-4210-129-3127266909/22/32 59 18 71 14 A RITZ CAMERA FILM 01-4210-129-31 272718 09/22/92 10.00 10.00 ft DIXIE PETRO-CHEM DEMURRAGE 72-4324-549-91 272731 09/22/92 1,219.00 STEENBURG-WATRUD INC VENEER CTY HALL/PO 25-4520-410-00 272734 09/22/82 15,012 00 23,301.00 ft STEENBURG-WATRUD INC VENEER PW BLDG 25-4520-484-00 tiA Afti 272775 09/22/92 537.83 TOWN A COUNTRY SEPT CLEANING 01-4349-099-17 272775 09/22/92 213.00 750 83 ft TOWN A COUNTRY SEPT CLEANING 01-4349-129-31 272776 09/22/92 o o ft THORPE DIST CO BEER 74-4115-591-94 A • ft A • * 2727M ' Oi/22/92 767 00 TRI STATE PUMP REPAIR GRINDER ST 73-4344-S69-92 •••-CRS 1992 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTERCHECK NO DATE AMOUNT767.00ft VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INVftftiftHd27279609/22/92 60.30 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 01-4221-129-3127279609/22/92 183.55 243 85 •UNIFORMS UNLIMITED MJ TEST KITS 01-4232-129-3127212609/22/S2 2.265.262.265.26 ft WALDOR PUMP PUMP INSPEC 73-4344-569-9227283109/22/92 7.25 WALTERS LINDA MTG 01-4356-069-1527283109/22/92 45.9853.23 ft WALTERS LINDA MILEAGE 01-4381-069-1527283S09/22/92 369.77369.77 ft WARNING LUES OF MN FLASHERS 01-4331-249-42 272841i , 01/22/92 398 78 WATERPRO WTR MTR 72-1273-000-00 272841 09/22/92 147.95 546 73 ft WATERPRO PARTS 72-4232-549-91 ft ft ft ft ft ft 27284S 09/22/92 33 27 33 27 ft WECKMAN STEPHEN MILEAGE 01 -4381-174-33 itiHill 2728S0 09/22/92 36.43 36 43 ft WEST PUBLISHING BOOK 01-4240-129-31 272901 09/22792 4.132.00 4.132.00ft MN DEPT or REVENUE MN WTR CONN FEE 72-2222-000-00 272903 09/22/92 12 00 12 00 4 CALCA INC SUPPLIES 01-4210-129-31 272903 09/22/92 115 60 US 60 ft HEDBCRQ AGGREGATES BLOCKS 01-4233-249-42 2729Q4 09/22/92 547 38 547 18 ft MN CORRECTIONAL FAC PRINTING 01-4322-129-31 I2729QS 09/22/92 131 00 til K SERVICES DIRT 74-4343-590-93 09-28-92 PAGE•••-CKSft am -CKS•••-CK5•••-CKS ?»«.CKS «**-CKS •••-CKS S*i-CKS 1992 C CHECK272906272907ft ft ft ft ft ft2I2S22ft ft ft ft ftoq/S-HMIOIOv>ftS’S• • • • • ■ m2 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT131.00 •272906 09/22/92 140.00 140 00 •272907 09/22/92 179.48179 48 •• ft • a ft ft Y 09/22/92 28.616 07f 09/22/92 28.616.07-09/22/92 28.616.07 28.818 07 *ft ft ft ft ft «212522 09/22/92 87.33 CHECK REGISTERvendor item descriptionmaca fall workshop confASPEN EQUIPMENT PARTe''fr4iUNDuaironfiD B & £:(»KI£^round a,^D UNDERT3IIROUi^PYT 6 TH12 FRONTGE PYT 6 TH12 FRONTGE TH12 FRONTAGE RD IG 24-4532-488-0024- 4532-486-0025- 4532-486-00• 7.3317.57 63.00 80 57 •MTI DIST CO SUPPLIES4 3 4 3 5 9 09 3 ■SYSTE«A3ieW^ 74480259194Yciw//a;c.74-4232-590-9374-4343-590-9374-4802-591-94FUNDFUND FUND FUNDFUND FUND FUND FUND TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTALTOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL GENERAL FUND IMPROVE & EQUIP OUTLAY F MUNIC STATE AID CONS FUN 91 PUBLIC FACIL CONSTR F WATER OPERATING FUND SEWER OPERATING FUND GOLF COURSE OPERATING FD 09-2S-92 PAGE 8 ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. • MESSAGE01-4358-129-3101-4232-249-42 •••-CKS•••-CKS•«*-CKS•••-CKS OI-2I-I2 PAQC I ACCOUNT NO INV. I P.O. I MESSAGEOl-«3SI-i2S-3iOl-*232-2«i-*224-4532-4I6-0024- 4532-418-0025- 4532-448-00?4-42l2-590-93T4-4343-9i0-9374-«l02-581*t4rt*T P «s ruN «iST« r s ifia po GEMUNIS FINANCIAL SYSTEMACCOUNTING REPORT00 1892 CITY OF ORONONUMBER OF REPORTS 70 UPDATE DESCRIPTIONSNUMBER OF UPDATES 0 SUMMARY FILENUMBER OF RECORDS PAYROLLLEVEL 1 I.U2 BENEFIT ACCRUALLEVEL 2 0 ACTIVITY REPORTLEVEL 3 0 CHECK REGISTERLEVEL 4 0 TRIAL BALANCELEVEL 5 34 BALANCE SHEETLEVEL 6 0 REVENUE STATEMENTLEVEL 7 0 OPERATING STATEMENTLEVEL 1 0 BUDGET WORKSHEETSlev:l 9 0 CLEAR-CURR-MONTH LEVEL 0 2 CITY FILE OPTION PROJECT DEPARTMENT TOTAL 1.150 CHART OF ACCOUNTS MO CHECK RECONCILE YEAR TO DATE PERIOD BUDGET RECORDS CREATED 09/22/92 DPT YTOGROSS CURRENTGROSSli2175.03 241.67112175.03 241.«7112175.03 241.67112175.03 241.67112700.00 300.001.266.61 63 29 1ST NATL 430 07 1ST NATL 306 00 1ST NATL 126 36 1ST NATL 134 17 1ST NATL SIS »•1ST NATL 14 »2 1ST NATL 76 1ST NATL 17 02 1ST NATL 112 14 1ST NATLisi271STNATLno 2.6S7 20 • 0 • 1ST NATL • •LUNDS 01-4121.imNUAL?«-434).S»9.t3 HAKUAL Ol*<9ti.l2f.31 »WNUAL 01 -4142.020.U 01*4142.01t-l2 ei*4142-Mi.i90I-4142-1U.31 01 4i42llS-3l 01*4i42-lf«.33 01*4l4.--its.3s 01*414:24t-42 0l-4l42*2»0*«)| |}*4142*SM*I2 ft-4143.%»o.92l MA*niAt MANUAL MANUAL manual MANUAL P4ANUALManual manual manual MANUAL manual MAJfyAL 01-4H3-fti^3l MAliUAL //' >• > >' <#k V . *" '.V /*, \' *'^v CITY of ORONO Muniripat 0<Bw> PulUfflccKusM ( Bm. \tinwmta S5.^2VMM September: 22, 1992 JoEllen Hurr 93C< Par^enwood Road Long Lake# Minnesota 55356 Dear Ms. Hurt# I first would like tc commend you for your interest in serving the City as a member of the Cit’v Council. Secondly# I a® available to meet with you to update /ou concerning the City's servicesi programs# projects, etc. This could include providing information, answering questions and generally helping you to familiarize yourself wi*ih whatever areas of the City are of interest to you. Please feel free to call me at your convenience. Sincerely# Ronald >7. Moorse City Administrator cc* City Council Council Candidates Hi tnainiB - • rva / o w \ V A % V'. •-ui 4. ^e, >»/' i; ‘ CITYof ORONO ■ *esHO«^ Mimirtpal Offk'eK I\bI Oflkf Boi 66 I'n^iUil Rmr. MinimioCii 55323-4 September 24, 1992 Charici Kelley 2720 White Oak Clccle Long Lake# Minnesota 55356 Dear Mr. Kelley, I first would like to commend you for your interest in serving the City as a member of the City Council. Secondly, I am available to meet with you to update you concerning the City's services, programs, projects, etc. This could include providing Information, answering questions and generally helping you to familiari2e yourself with whatever areas of the City are of interest to you. Please feel free to call me at your convenience. Sincerely, Ronald J. Moorse City Administrator cc* City Council Council Candidates // i<O 0\\ r ' \ \ \ ", \\rU H.\^,'\\^^JK /V V ’ i, K /*> ■' v^l ■ ■■■ i -r~ CITY of ORONO Nfuniripal Offkt* PkMi Office Bm 66 Cr>^ Mlfuiwiili 5531MI066 September 22» 1992 Gary M. Printup P.O. Box 104 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Mr. Printup, I first would like to commend you for your interest in serving the City as a member of the City Council. Secondly, I am available to meet with you to update you concerning the City's services, programs, projects, etc. This could include providing information, answering questions and generally helping you to familiarize yourself with whatever areas of the City are of interest to you. Please feel free to call me at your convenience. Sincerely, Ronald J.*^ Moorse City Administrator cc: City Council Council Candidates Fair Housing Issues in the SuburbsTuesday, October 27,1992 8:30 a.ni.-12 noon Wayzata Free Church 8:30 8:40 9;l 10.*00 10:45 11 Agenda Registration, Rolls, Coffee Wskome Denise Buckner, Suburban Hennepin Anti-Racism Committee Jonathan Farmer, Suburban Hermepin Housing Coalition Video "Must There Be a Will Between You and Me?" Federal Fair Housing l^w Jaime Pedraza, Fair Housing Officer, U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development PiUiel Discussion State and Local Housing Di.scrimiji/jrion Laws attd Remedies Break Workshops {Choose one, see box. righti Workshops A. How to recognize a Biir Housing issue Houting discnminaiion is often sub(k and no( recngni/ed cither by the person being discrimi- naled against or by the social service woitcr who is helping that person with other iMues. Darindn Wider, Aid nWrney, will discutt how to listen to clienu to identity Fair Housing iasties and how o guide a clknt appropriate retoarce^. Dc!>ifneJ ku advocates iiaJ provkkn of direct client assluance. B. Fair Housing Testing Programs A Fair Housing Testing Progrifn. wmdmg testers info the community, can be mi eflactiwc way to identify violators of Fair Hottsiiig Laws. A rrp rcscnutfve of the lloustiif Cefiier wiU cTptain horn ilieir ^<ring pnigrtm works and whu your i^icy to kr w and do to us up ud nm a lasing pfogmii. C. Exclusionary Zoning In tome enmmunaws, romng codes may be used to block low income houting. trcntitional housing, group homes or ottscr prpgmn. Ftarii lio^n, htHtal KaXli L«a aUarhey, wjB idcnli^ Fair HeuMg awiMa in Mniaig aiUMlKma She'S the Suburbs►n WEiyzata Free ChurchWorkshopsA. How to recognize a Fiitr IHnising issuetfMcnmtfiMion ii oftn ititsle ud noteither hy the p«»a fcdaf ^icrime Mt«d >{ainsi OT by the lockl •etvicr worker who n betf'tn^ tfaa penua wkli other imiM. OirMi ^Wae, Ug»l .%id aOmey, wUI to tUten to clients to identic Fair iuucs and how to fMida a ettoni to tewMsees Deified lie advoeaica ■nd pnnakn of direct cteni iiiietont e. H. lair Housing Testing i ftograms A Fair Hanewg Tcattog Frofnw, awktii<| toatm wm toe ew nwndy. cia b« n eflr^ive W*y to Ideeaify vekuen ef Fhir Hensinf 1-aws. A fcpen mm a pffi^ani C E«tesiottar|r Zoning !■ ewtoMtoOM « fowiaf ewics may he wO aiMh^ F«r Hettoing neoei • ( »e 1 e Hwe wtai »i toy vwtoto rw Uawhig ba» rnwtoni^iaaayi^thit- Can \bu Recognize Discrimination?Housing discrimination is rarely Matant.It is usually cleverly disguised and, more often than not, is done with a smile and a handshake.Too often, housing discrimination may not be recognized by the person being discrimi­nated against or by the social service worker or advocate who is helping that person with other issues.Fair housing rights arc violated wheu someone is prevented from doing the follow­ing because of race, color, sex, national origin, disability or family status:• Viewing or renting an apartment• Viewing or purchasing a home• Applying for or securing a home loan• Pui^wsing homeowners or renters insurance Fair Housing laws can open doors, but only with your help. Learn to recognize the signs of discrimination in rental, sales, lending and insurance. People should be suspicious when they hear tines like these: • 7 rented that apartment right after you called." • “This complex isn't suitaMe for kid.s --no playground or open space." • "We have a no-pets rule and that includes yow guide dog. ’ • “There's a long waiting tht for these apartmetUs, but / t un gel you in if vou're nice to me."¥ Come to this half-day conference to learn more ^M)ut fair housing laws! Who Should AttendAnyone who deals with clients who have any kinds of housing needs, including:• Advocates• Tenant Advocates• Social Workers• Outreach Workers• Foodshelf Workers• Church Volunteers• Social Service Agency StaffThis conference will help you to recognize when client problems may be related to housing discrimination.Additional InformationConference registration will be the morning of the conference beginning at 8:00 a.m. A $5 donation will be requested. For additional conference Information, contact Jo Buchanan at 473-2436. Directions Wayzata Free Church is located in Plymouth <st 705 Highway lOI S'orth (3/4 mile north of 1-394 [former Highway I2J on the west side of Highway lOl). 1 AiTvreaktoiti tepart, l>n«ip mi Fair Housing Issuesin the SuburbsooTuesday, October 27, 1992 8:30 a.m.-l2 noon Wayzata Free Church Sri 2 3 i092 Conference Sponsort: Suburban H«Hie|un Umuiai Cwlitiaa jjidiorbon HowiyM Aaii-llaciMn Logw of MN UmuH Bights O Wfus Hrmrpin llianxn Service . i A COMMUNITY PREVENTION COALITION Reducing Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Problems in Hennepin County c/o Hennepin County Prevention Center September 14, 1992 525 Portland Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55415 (612) 348 6122 Barbara Peterson, Orono, City of P.O. Box Crystal Bay, MN 55323- Dear Barbara: The Community Prevention Coalition is an active group of agencies and organizations working together since April of 1991 to reduce chemical use anxmg youth in Hennepin County. As a le^er or decision-maker in your organization, we arc asking you to participate in an important next step for the Coalition. You are invited to attend an important meeting in (Detober where you will have the opportunity to help set the direction for Coalition activities for the next five years. The Community Prevention Coalition is at a critical point in its .1evelq)mcnL In 1992 the Coalition complck^d i year-long process to assess chemical use prevention needs in Hennepin County. In the process, information was gathered from approximately 10,000 young people, 10(X) parents and 5(X) community opinion leaders. Community members have identifi^ their needs, resources and concerns. In October, a one-day Coalition meeting will be held in three different Hennepin County locations. We encourage you to attend one of these meetings to examine the results of the community needs assessment and establish priorities that will be the basis of a five-yearplan for collaborative action in our community. If your organization is currently a Coalition mcnrf)cr or wants to assess wheilicr or not to bccotnc active with the Coalition, now is the time to attend one of the upcoming meetings to help set the course for the Coalition’s future work. Who should attend these CcKiliiion meetings? Key decision-makers (executive directors, chief executive officers and/cv designees) in organizatiems concerned about you^ chcntical use; representatives of current Cixilition organizations and those interested in becoming mvolved; youth and adults in local organizations working together in leadership positions. Most importantly, people should attend who plan to have their organization remain involved with tlK Coalitio n as it carries out its five-year plan to reduce youth chemical use problems. Meeting participants will be asked to examine the needs as>essment results looking at chemical use prevennon needs and resources ui ffcnnepin County and to help prioritize arcis for action. Die teptwri will be sent to registered participants in advance so that you will have an opportunity to look at the results bchwe the meeting. Meeting parucipants will be involved in a critk:al step w hich will set the focus of the CoaiitKW tor the next fiv'c years. Partkipams will receive; • a copy ‘ IVrspecrivcs vki Prevention*, a summary report of the CorraiHiniiy Prevtnikm Coalition rwds/rcsouaes asscssrocni ft CPC Meeting Notice 9/14/92 - Page 2 • detailed infoirnadon that can be used by y jur organization for local needs assessment, program planning, and grant writing • networking opportunities with a diverse group of local organizations concerned about youth chemical use and its implications Choose one of three meeting dates and locations: Thursday, October 8 Monday, October 19 Thursday, October 22 Brooklyn Park The Clubhouse at Edinburgh 8700 Edinbrook Crossing Minnetonka iVtorriott Hotel, OPUS Development Hightfay 169 and Londonderry Road Minneapolis West River Point Conference Center 1315 West River Road North Please complete the enclosed reservation card and return it to the Community ftevendon Coalition office no later than Thursday, October 1 in order to 'eserve a space at the meeting of your choice. Wc will send a copy of the completed "Pcrspccrives on Prevention" report to each registered participant pnor to the meeting and a map with directions to the meeting site ymi plan to attend. Lunch will be provided at no charge at each meetrng. If you have questions about the Coalition or the upcoming meetings, please contact the Coalition office at the Hennepin C^tv Prevention Center, 348-6122. ^ Sincerely^ Sam Gram Pamela Mbuntin Chairperson, CPC Execuov^ Comminec Chairperson. CPC i^g- Range Planning C nice Mark Lucas Prt>jec! Director, Conununitv Prevention Coalition Aitachincny: PreUrranar\* Meeting Agenda RSVP card A m « COMMUNITY PREVENTION COALITION Reducing Alcohol. Tobacco and Other Drug Problems in Hennepin County c/o Hennepin County Prevention Center 525 Portland Avenue South Minneapolis. MN 55415 (612) 348-6122 Coalition 1 nng-Range Planning Meetings Thursday, October 8, 1992 Brooklyn Park, Golf Club at Edinburgh Monday: October 19, 1992 Minnetonka, Marriott Hotel Thursday, October 22, 1992 Minneapolis, West River Point These meetings are being co-sponsored by Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council and South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency for Human Services. Preliminary Agenda 8KX)Registration. Coffee, Rolls Overview of Community Prevendon Coalition History Summarv of Nccds/Resources Asscssmem Results Setting Priorities for Coalition Action 12:15 Lunch .Methods and Stratcgi-s for Idendiled Priority Areas: can the Coalition do? Developing a long-range plan for the Coalition: Next Steps 2:45 Adjourn Please reserve a space for me at one of the Community Prevention Coalition's meetings to help set the course for the Coalition's future woric. I will aaend: (mark with ’X”) (Return this self-addressed card by October 1,1992.) Thurs., October 8 Brooklyn Park Oubhouse at Edinburgh Mon., October 19 Minnetonka Marriott Hotel Thun., October 22 Minneapolis West River Point ii NAME ORGANIZATION ADDRESS CITY ZIP PHONE Regisiered participants w'UI receive, prior to the meeting, ’’Per^iectives on Prevention* - the summary report of the CPCs needVresources asse^nent - and a map with d"^:uQQS to the site of the me^ng they will attend. Cooimuniiy Prevention Coalition, c/p Prevention Center, 52S Ponland Awe., Mpiv, MN 554 IS V Lake Minnetonka Conservation District MEETING AGENDA TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (TRC) Meeting of Sept. 22, 1992, 8:00 AM - Noon Norwest Bank Building - Board Room, Mezzanine Floor 900 E. Wayzata Blvd., Wayzata Please use west entrance I. Discussion and Approval of Minutes of 8/25/92 and this Agenda II. Flexibility Requests A.Mound (Koegler) B.Minnetonka Beach (Hurr) C.Tonka Bay (Richards) D.Shorewood (Nielsen) E.Deephaven (Bennis) 111. Next Meeting 9-15-92 LAki: MlNNinONKA CQNSEUVATION DISIHICT MINUTES TECHNICAL HEVIEW COMMITTEE (THC) Meelintf of AuK. 25. 19‘J2. 0:00-10:00 A.M. Norwcst Hank building - Conference Hoorn 900 E. Wayzata Ulvd.. Wayzaln 1 Agenda and Minutes Minutes of 7/28/92 and agenda for this meeting approved. II. Flexibility Hequest ” Wayzata (presented by Ed Fick/1 Ed began by distributing copies of: (l) 7/31/92 letter to Pick from Scott Richards (consulting planner) transmitting adopted shoroland controls, flexibility request, and ® Wavzata Management Flan for the Wayzata Shorelond Districl. l 2) zata Shoroland Flexibility Hequest; (3) pp. 31-42 of the Slior-' am Management Flan. Next. Ed explained that Wayzata is requesting flexilM ity for widths, residential density, impervious coverage IimiIs and maximum structure height. The City has inventory of its existing land usca and has compared various characteristics of it to the DNH standards. Ihe tity feels strict adherence to the DNH standards would make existing development nonconforming and would ^“i ty * landowner's rights, inhibit development, and affect the Cil> tax base." lot Tho City’s request Includes somc-hst imrruwer lot :i;"t structures. While ‘-.e Csicui.lions of res.d.-ntu.l density reve.l 'J,'" residenlisl cspscily :n so.e sreas It ' * j id;:;!ir:%rrord. .,v.r -■:-“j-ri?;i7:;i‘:;:r:;ocer.:'u;7. questions -ere raised about .,,her e.t.es role, and procedures f..r poasil. e in r..ull»-l> send S.veral ae.ber. suSSe.te.l ' L, , ..,.s 1., ell Ihenotices of conditional use heannss •‘••u oiner ^ other cities. One seso. r suggas e '* ducuation about the perforo such a aervice. M. ?.„.ia in different concept of t ransf er r I ng d-na I. y - ^ mg ts-ie involved, o.licrahip and -liether there be. suae th- .. . . .cu;": ron.„g .« /«*eaputmt ions lanuowrHJrs would coritiiiue to have tiie have now. same property rights they Impervious surface coverage of existing development was also calculated on a detailed, lot-by-lot basis and then totaled for each zoning district. It ranges from a low of 2% in u residential area to 100% in one of the commercial districts. Overall for the Minnetonka shoreland area it is R%. Ihe City is proposing to allow impervious coverage in several of tne districts lo exceed the 25% standard for nc developments (up to possibly 75%) if structures and practices are in place to treat storm water before discharge to the lake. All propo.sals which would exceed the ordinance requirements would be required to meet the objectives of the City’s Storm Water Management I’lan and provide added physical protection for preserving water (]uality. fhe City adopted the Flan in *88 and is now implementing it. There was considerable discussion by members of several aspects of the proposal. One asked if the City’s Flan covers storm water runoi f from existing development lit does). Several also had questions and comments about the rity’s proposed procedures for allowing higher impervious limits and for keeping track of "transfers" of allowed coverage. Members inquired about how DNR responds to notices and what recourse they have if their expressed concerns are not addressed in final dccisitms of. cities. HI. Follow-Ups on Flexibility .lequests A. Spring Fark Ed Pick mentioned the DNH still has .some aignif leant concerns and will be meeting with /lien Brixius soon to discuss impervious limits (storm water management), future redevelopment of the two large manufacturing sites, and mapping of wetlands on the zonirg map. U. Woodland Pick reported the standards for Minnetonka are settled, but disagreement remains on one issue involving another lake. that C. Minnotr ista Jay Blake explained that the City intends to tighten a lot width standard and the standards for vegetation alterations. D. Ot^e, cities , » I. i. Member. .rom Mound. Deephaven. Shorrwood. and Minnetonka Beacli will be ready for Mie September meeting. Bill lhib«»ilt. a consulting planner, announced he has been ret»i:ned by '** devoloj Its §► '-eland controls. Steve Freslin meiil loned he lias reviewed a dr for Excelsior prepared by a consul laiil (Kcrmit Cruut h). IV. Next Meeting Tne next meeting will be Sept 22 and <*111 last 4 hours m LHc^ - I Hi* A/AM£. C^/ 3/^^'^' V CC t5ai,_^4.'^‘i“ /** 1. ci^- ,y^Wt, 'A /li4i!^)c^ it 'f 1 /^EP^ESIEMT/HQ Cy tT-=»i'4^‘= L /hcT:> 0-^^ M‘ t^i^r/i/^ UoJ^L^P ('leM^Ei’j Cotii.r l/l^fV/C/'l \^jEP^Ci f ^'Ji /rV/<^ ’* (' Lt\CA D.J-. 1. 3. 4. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT LAKE USE AND RECREATION COMMIT! AGENDA [USOiii Fonday, Saptember 21 , 1992 , 4; 30 PM Nor««8t Bank Building ^ 900 E. Wayzata Blvd. Room 135 Scr 1 • (Elavator access for Hardicapped; U8© w**t entranca on Wayzata Blvd.) Spacial Evafita A. New avant application: Ica Piahing Eacuraion^ by Georga Stodola 4 Art Bollmann. Excalaior PIN, 12/26/92 thru 2/28/93 Raquasc for late fat to bo waived for o renewal application submitted lata than 90 days prior to event: Viking Baaamasters l6th Annual Rasa Tournament, 10/4/92 (latter of 3/10/92 attached) C.Cittian complaint on 0/16/92 boat tournaiDon*. boat no i at 2. Shoreliof Boot Count Summary Report Water Patrol Report A. Monthly Activity Report SaoHffiobiia raiiatration number eiie reduction avaluatioo prugraae by MN ONR: LMCD Staff Report J, Diecuaaion of Licenae fee Bchedule for 1992 ae^ 1993 0. Additional buaiuaaa C ) W *0199Z •. * I c.p. Lake Minnetonka Conservation District LMCD Fee ^ ^ ^ _-l WINTER SPECIAL EVENT (for LHCD use) iecauee this form ie t to be copied, please I Uft black ink or type.!r WIMTER r ^^jFur APPLICATION!I SPECIAL EVENT LICENSE CLH’ T^ol moLinn (Nesie of eppJ y‘in'' Scent) J (xl^dO^ 'T^ood___X. (Address)(Phone number) . V > ' , f > (Responaible party. l£ different from applicant)(Phone number) If no answer, call (Address) 1. Dotcribs event"^Tcx2 Lake Area(s) 2. Point kI i ^\n\\L hi Id Ue'<r,<~C LMCD Number(s) (see map) aint of access (y>te on ^closed map) ».W <1 i^UA f OPf'f'O ) , uU3. Event data • attach additional sheets if necessaryi a) Oate<s b) Tima of day / a c) Participant's entry fesi I d) Total prises to be awarded I d tn e) Istiaated ntuibsr af participants (persons)__ / - -r V t) Passenier vehicles are never deeieed safe on Uke Ice. «>oes event recjulre vehicles on the Ice? ^ ** ■®* —nx» g) What parklAf provisions are airanged on land throogh the affected cltyf h) lew ate event supervisors «i f led i A 4 Hh.il 1—tllL0 1) II event is for a coernament Of CMtesc. rules must be attaclisd Check s# Indleating ( >. fever I .L winter Special Event License Application Page 2 Lake Minnetonka Conservation District yLl/.jrg i c* (Ev^nt) 4. 5. 6. 7. Will temporary markers bo used to (a) delineate your area of operation, and/or (b) determine points of Lako access? A/O If so, enclose a site plan with marker locations Indicated. Removal of markers is mandatory Immediately upon event conclusion. Describe effect on Lake Ice sur face/V/^ Dy*t | ( — Describe litter control /hli (i piC>Kf.(L U f> (llW f 4 cr tetf-h c\rs^. Will any portion of this event be conducted ^n snore? /Jf? If so. describe 8. Are any additional Lake-oriented activities planned In conjunction vlth this event? _ _ _ _ _ _ If so, please specify t 1 9, Describe any open water that will be created, other than holes for ice &ithlng<I Detail fencing and safety arrangementsi_ _ _NO Y\ 10. n. Describe other safety provisions that are being arrangedrlf/1 tK ^ nr Ir / K V|------- -4d njtvi 4rntn iOvll\ (ta<daiiri will event require Water Patrol, city, or other enforcement iupervlaioa?, — If eo, describe! 12. Will event create additional noiiet or. the Lake? It eo, dcecrlbei jJc- describe! 14. le event open to the embllc? . tit IJ. Ihiecrlbe hoe time or piece ef event will 4 I i r 1 '* f lii I feet IntCfiflCy o^-leke use! '^jhiSL—iL&tv/' ^ Uinr\''^a^AL Jl r Lake Mlnnjtor.Ua Conservation DistrictWinter .-j * f”* . i ' tf.* /• Special Event License Application r '^iCi m Page 3 lEv^t) 16. Public liability insurance: Coverage ^00^1 f./j f) IHK'fr\ ^ Coro p a n ~-^t)dtO ^t17. Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol requires your Application. A copy la enclosed. 18. Other agencleo may olso require your afpllcatlons and their MN DNR (772-7950), clty/clties, and Hennepin Parks (Guest Services, 559-67207. 19. r E E S. Please note: this fee is for processing of the application and does not entitle the applicant to a license or refund. BASE FEE, Includes events up to days ^days over 4 0 SlO/day Sub Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LATE PENALTY, applies to NEW events submitted less than 60 prior to the event, and applies to RENEWALS submitted .ess than 30 days prior to the event. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ •f $ 1 0 0 r-0 "tr- PLUS LICENSE DEPOSIT, refundable, depending upon full compliance with the LMCD Code and extent of admialstraclve, inspection and legsl service required. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 0 0 TOTAL fEE attached I certify thet the information provided herein and the DUtrlH and Lrrict. I understand that any license grented may be revoked by t^ District ana correct. » , i aetee to reimburse the District for any •ndEH;”::; ;;v;; and agents of the District et ell reasonable " whether or not the Code of the District Is being compileddl-h. Authorised alart»a.ure 'Ah(M rxsvft Please return this appllcetlon and attachsenti toi Title Lake Hlnnetoeiia Cemserval lem bislrlct too 1. wavtata ilvd.. fmlte IbO klaysata. Hinnesota 553V1 PHeme. (612» A7J-7013 «m#ei ---------- i ( a. 4-i i f— —-J —L.l___1 ■4 — tI I ♦ -- —111 1 __l i _._.( 5l !i —— T-----..X I> r-Xk_IL'_4 V -1 -/r / f> r\f- - X?'1'S i bj—•T / . D" . ._ (pHrfi _________.:<! i-lJ • •- •• ■— c:c(^icJL —- -t—f s^rff I ''jr t —:_____ t I -1—; I I £tta i^/n/i"r4 '_1_'>“‘ It. . ^ I ' • if>rrH Lf^f, >?«b<'; -4^-* — ►i- — > ^----- -------- ) * ' V\cru-s<^*^ \z. ^ ^t«.ci^Cc~^nfTv.^~tO <x (3j2u ^ \^cLrV«-*:>fcL€4\j K£ru.^tj^ . Kiru.**-*^— iM/jJt ct'GU<^ |vgR3-a , tOv'^ 0^^^)‘5|!Z. \i a.^i^| A\aJ ICTAJ • bO 'i'o.We^ ^ Ci(?«i.t |CS ^ Tr'i CK*^^Rrrv\ rwii v<^C\Z- ci (L 5 t^^>\ J J •o c\\f2- ) llDc x.v^ ' Kc .c <.Hu 1 Qlicg>w^vL ^ r^iC ^ tJ-.e el l^<lc\A>icL Hh.C » VI f~V»P-JSfc ^ F^ «»i d /^Lx^dl^r f c ,1^_ f ^ —■ r — (Ylctj ^ ^ 4^*cL ^-^^Ovcioi LoC c A €sf«5.bl« «/^-£XCj-C*S ^ ^WV C»ciai^ (pp^va.2.<L puA<3iJ»c.4^ of doLup, U^«-A. / cW^ cL?cxcik>ci <o^»>-f\-) 4-.*^ *'V« ‘ V '>%y1U*01992 • • r* p iOARO ME MM fit 0«v«dH Chair Graartwood Tom Ro#aa Vco Chair Mound DouQiaa E iabcoca Sacralary Sphf^g Park J P Botannka*. Tfaa*%.r»*' MmnaiorAa Baach SooaCarlaorf M»r>natf»ata Alba^ ifan) fosiw Oaaphavan Jimat N Qrathaiei Esca^fiof JoENan I Murr Oor^ \0MkmmA Jghnnooa Mtnr^Ohka Markua Wiyia ^ Oao^gaC '%»a« Vtftona Tam Parm Tonka Pay Potan Aakcoo the rankaad HaiartE !^acum LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 900 EAST WAY2ATA BOULEVARD. SUITE 160* WAYZATA MINNESOTA 6S.191 • TFlf HONE fil2 473 7033 EUGENE n STROMMEN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Septembvf 16, 1992 FoxhilJ Homeown^rn Assoc, c/o Mr. Ray Zitzloff 1160 Heritage Lane Hayiata MN 55391 Dear Mr. Zitzloff: As explained in our letter of 3/28/92 to Mr. Johnson, during the annual dock inspection we found that slip #1, your designated slip, was not in confornance with the licensed site plan approved for 1992. You have discussed the problems encoun'ered installing your slip with the executive director. Gene Strommon. There was an .sgreemcpt that the slip would be left this way for the 1992 season. This will not be .icceptable for the 1993 season. The docks will need to be installed according to the licensed site plan. We appreciate your cooperation in ensuring thst the docks sre installed in cosipliance with the licensed site plan in 1993 and subsequent years. Sinceraly, 'MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Rache 1 Thihault Adsiinistrative Technician e: M. Johnson Mike G4ffron. OroBO J. Hurt / »* > .1 ^ iti • rk •• a « • I.AKP. MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA 7:00 PM - Public Hearing 7:30 PM - Regular meeting Wedneisday, September 23, 1992 Tonka Bay City HaJJ 4901 Manitou Road (County Rd 19) 7:00 PH - PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Halated Ba Quiet Haters Area - to determine the need for astabliahi g a quiet waters area, 5 mph speed limit, in part o£ Halsted Bay 2. Pheasant Lawn Homoowners Association, Carman’s Bay, Orono - new multiple dock license application for a pre-existing six slip dock 7:30 PH - REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTU READING OP MNUTES - 8/26/92 Board Meeting PUBLIC COMMENTS - tron persons in attendance not on agendu COMMITTEE REPORTS 1 . B LAKE USB AND RECREATION, Chair Foster A. Approval ot minutes, meet! tig of 9/21/92 Special Events 1) New event application: Ice Fishing Excursions by Georga Stodoia A Art Bo 11 man. Excelsior MN, 12/2 6/ 92 thru 2/2B/93 2) Request tor late fee to be waived for ranewal applicacion from Viking Bassmasters 16th Annual Bsss Tournamnit, 10/4/92 Prosecuting Attorney Tailen. report on summer s prosecutioaa Hen- Otn County Sheriff's Hater Patrol Report 1992 and 1993 License Pee Schedule review per committee discussion Additional business reeommended by committee 0 2.SaTRR ITMUCTURBS, Chair Babeock A. Approval of minutes, meeting of 9/|2'92 B. Appoint subeommittee to review dralt ordinaaa# relating to the effect on licenses of failure to construct within e cartaim time, amending Code fact. 2.OS Board Agonda, 9/23/92, Page 2 C. D. E . First reading of drait ordinance reJating to deicing equipment on Lake Minnetonka, amending Code Sect. 2.09, recommending attorney’a Option 2 for Subd. 7, authorizing the executive director to isaue renewal deicing licenses with no violations the prior season, all other applications referred to the Board (accompanied by further staff report) Orono ordinance prohibiting the use of non**encased styrofoam as a dock flotation device, recommending scheduling a public hearing prior to adopting similar ordinance Additional business recommended by committee 3.ENVIRONMENT, Chair Hurr A. Approval of minutes, meeting report of 9/15/92 B. Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force, Chair F'nnn A.LAKE ACCESS TASK FORCE. Chair Grathwol A. Subcommittee progress and October Task Force mooting announcement FINANCIAL REPORTS. Treasurer Carlson A. August Statement of Cash Transactions Bt Audit of Vouchers for Payment EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT, Strommen UHFTHT3HRD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS 1. Election of Otficora, Noraioating Committee Report ADJOUUNMBNI LAKE MlNNETOf JKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT PUBLIC HEARING PHEASANT LAWN HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION NEW MULTIPLE DOCK LICENSE Wednesday, September 23, 1992 7;00 PM Tonka Bay City Hall Joseph Forrer. President, Pheasant Lawn Homeowners . Association, has submitted an ® dock license for an existing six slip dock. This multipl dock is in a lagoon off Carman's Bay, LMCD J", City of Orono. It is located on Lot 14 of Pheasant La n , which is owned by tho eleven members of che of? soc i a 11 on. association was formed in January 1979. Lot 14 was a large wetland that was dredged around the mo‘.. It is no- »o,Ur -...r is meandering shoreland between Lots 15, ' .k,. The o«nor. of th... lot= ......nto o,.r h, portion, of Lot U b.t»een th.ir lot. anJ th* l.k., particular Ed Kohoner. o-nar of Lot la. 1!::: dock 1. th. nor.h.rn moat • -P »' for—i—i"i •■>■1 another dock on his easement that is used tor fishing, but not boat storage. There is roughly 280 j,, .hotel in# along the .lip dock .. loc.t.d. .hor.lina. uund' that ;. contm-ou. -i.h th. .hot.l - Where the docks ere located. . . 10* t#tbjck on thm •uiiCti;^::%;\‘h::::rir.%.i.hhor^to th.^.o..h I:,: luctl'.^n'*.! I:r«.oc!aiion-. dock. -hUk .di.c— «• her property. DOCK - NEW RECtIVtU Lake Miiitietonka Consetvatlon District JUN 29 1992 Receipt #__li£l UM.C.D. city response due received (for LMCD use) License Year No. of Bo.it 8__ Boat Density Index ________ C.in be reached at piione # Because this form is ! to be copied, please f use black ink or typo.i f APPLICATION: NEW MULTIPLE DOCK, LAUNCH I NO RAMP, AND/OR MOORING LICENSE Pursuant to LMCD Code 12.03, a new multiple dock license is requested, in accordance with all data and other information submitted herewith and Sa a part hereof. Print or type owner's name Phone; if no , _^nswer, callt ‘ /Tf P H A-^ - /7LL jjV 9 CP2.^ Owner's address /HjuMLpJjl Owner's addrei Business name (if different from owner) Oc* /t / CA V K*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ -— Contact person (If different from owner) , Street address Phone; if no answer, call: vr/- ‘jy/f 9‘^9-ce-^U Phone Mailing address (If different from street address) Property located In the City of_ _(5y fCCAd Property is riparian to LMCD bay/area(sVjLiAZj)l/*A' » No(s).- - -77 1. Claeelfication ot use per 12.11, Subd. 2 (please check one)i e) cosBserclal suirlne_____ d) transient ______.___ g> private resldenc* b) privata club e) iminlclpal______________ e) outlot eseocletlon X t) multiple dweillng_____ h) other (explain) 2. Type of dock construction, describe ant^attach to*scalf drawlngi^- - - - --i ■" . 1 itJ^L_ _ _ _ _ _ _/. . . . . . . . .. . . .. 3. Pteeae submit names and mailing addresses of owners of abutting sites and owners of other affected sites. Such ovnets may be verified by checking with Hennepin County property description offices. 348-3271 . which can provide ectual maUlM labels at a cost of 11.00 per tax parcel. Thie service uauallv takes three days, and you must have your tax parcel ident if icat ton number ready when calltng for this assistance. 4. DecusMnts listed below arc requtrwdi chech that they ere attached: ^ Locator map_______/______ Staled drawing showine present deebage County plat ewip_ Certified land survey, legal description V 1.Scaled drawing sbrrwing proposed doekote,. Scaled drawing of decliB ee abetting propert lee. and other offoctod doefcal* _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ Absence of etgniflcant data requested above eeuld reMit tn • proeeasing delay N«w Dock License Appl Icat lu«i L.ike Mlnnetonkii Ccmsorv.it ton Dlitrict TA T /iis. cLc/iL^jsk (Niim« ) 5. 6. All required permits, licenses and approvals have been obtained from the MH OKI and from the city in which the multiple dock, ramp, and/or mooring is located, copies attachedi ( ^ )Yes ( )Not If No, explaint rC U’^iU CAvt^ U'/TK Public liability iiisurancet Coverage 9 B( C'j t'OQ > Company_ _/C*l All commercial appl ic«iiit:n, and others where applicable, must provide the following additional informatiuii /, 8 and 7.Check the nature of services snd parking required by tite cityi a) Boat storage. . . . . . . . . . .. . . .- number of parking spaces _ _ _ _ _ _ _ b) Launching ramps. . . . . . . . . . . .Q__ _ _ • number of parking spaces i Times ramp is open for public usei c) Sales....... d) Service. . . c) Boat rentals I) Restaurant.. g) Other iexpljin) aV c7k<lc s»f “ number of parking spaces - number of parking spaces ~ number of parking spaces -* number of parking spaces Zi £■ • number of parking spaces <r: Z £1 TOIaL parking spaces Rest room facilities provided! Indoor, Outdoor po.cable (nuikHsr), C 9. Boat toilet pumping service provided? Yes A ALL ArrUCATIOliSt 10.Lsks frontage of aite> feet. Total square footage of dock niaa tfictudtng maneuvering apace • _ _ _ _ _ sq.ft. If 20,000 sq.ft, or over, an Environswntal Asse I. «nc Worksheet (CAW) is required. II. Boat Storage Units (BSD) eomputstlont frontage____50 • /f, BSU'e r is less cImmiallowable under the one*boac*par'f1 fty*foot rule. If tBIa th« total iSlI’e applied for in No. II Wtow, am appllcatlom fat a Spoclal OomeiCy LIcooam ia roquired per i'^sde 12.05. Numbsr of BBV’t applied fon By tocatlon ____ at alipa........................................................... St slides.................................................. B5l-> St Iwfls..................................................... MO at tie-ems.............................................. MU St moorings ............................................. MO at off-Laks rack scorago............. MV •Cher _ _ _ _ By tfso far feme. lease, etc. for service w»»»k. . . lor «nmpsST vs#. . . for private «ao. . . for cr«aatomt maa.... oCBot_______________ BSV B80 Bf« MN Total appliod for _ _ _MN if ggg rttrat MV applisd for I c «mb f I m^4 > I L.nke Minnetonkn Conserv.it Ion District New Dock License Application 3 7' 'i't: i* n/ J ’ //j/n %’ C Uv**aX'S' (Name) I 13. Witercraft Storage Units (WSU) computation schedule! BSD (? I WSU (each slip up to 20* long and/or up to 10' wide) BSU (8 IS WSU (each slip 20'-*- to 24' long .ind/or up to 11' wide) BSU (3 2 WSU (each slip 24'+ to 32' long and/or up to 12' wide) BSU 0 2S WSU (each slip 32'+ to 40' long and/or up to 14' wide) BSU (3 3 WSU (each slip 40'+ to 48' long and/or up to 16' wide) BSU 0 4 WSU (each slip over 40' long and/or over 16' wide) L WSU WSU JQ WSU _ _WSU WSU BSU Total Watercraft Storage Units (WSU) • WSU 14. Fee calculatloni Base fee 500 Pins number of Watercraft Storage Units (WSU) IZ-S' (? 515 as determined from WSU computation and schedule shown In No. 13 above.... ^ Total fee enclosed (this fee is for processing of the application ^ and does not entitle the applicant to a license). . . . . . . . . . . 5 I certify that the Information provided herein and the attachmenta heieto are true and correct. I understand that any license Issued msv be revoked by the District for violation of the LMCD Code. 1 agree to relartnirae the Dtetrlct for any lege^ officers and agents of the District to enter the premises at all reasonable inveitlgata and to determine whether or not the Code of the District is being compiled With. \ agree to subsiit a certified, aa-bullt aurvey upon completion of the docks ^te ■•teni this appllceilen and atiachments to*Laha Mlnnatomha Conservation OistrteC egg g. Wavtaca ilvd-. inlte Mavsata Hf* 55>hl pfeone (4II> 4M*T0)1 !•/§! Pheasant Lawn Homeowners* Association 1. 3. 3. 4. S. Common Dock Member IrfQ.t IntergsL Forrer Part of Lots 1, 2 and 3, Pheasant Lawn Off Lake 2 Hoffman Lot 6, Pheasant Lawn Off Lake 4 Reddick Ijot 8, Pheasant Lawn Off Lake 1 Whitworth N. part of Lot 10, Pheasant Lawn Off Lake 3 Bakke S. part of Lot 10, Pheasant Lawn Off Lake 5 Dock Location Martin Tract A, R.L.S.Lake Lot Tract B, Brown Tract B, R.L.S. 1<^53 Lake Lot Tract B, Cullen Part of Lot 17 and Lot 18, Pheasant Lawn Lake Lot Lot 14 easement Salley Lot 1, Block 1, Yolo Smiley Addn. Lake Lot Lot 14 easement, Salley III Lot 2, Block 1, Yale Salley Addn. Lake Lot Lot 14 easement Mahoney Lot 15, Pheasant Lawn Lake Lot Lot 14 easccent Exhibit E Lalt«3Lake4^ke 13ak<9 5DockLocatAora Lot Tiract i, 14S3 Lot Tract B, 1491 Lot Lot 14 •asanaiitl ,^t Lot 14 aasesaot JOt Lot 14 Lot 14 o- fO ; • 1 1 ''J A > • i n H 41 « Z H 1i %Poti of ^ •LollO > W w . Ifll t ^ J • 4 i lis. . « I <*••! 6oof . . • » Pi&t of Survey for David S. Carlson In Lot 14» Pheasant Lavs Hennepin County^ Minnesota drivewoy ■ eas4mt/if 5cq/<: IOC Carl I flcate of Survey t , / 1 hereby certify that this la a foKc tms aad correct representation of a survey of the boundarlea of all of Lot 14» "Pheasant Ltvn", except that part descrlted aa follotai Biglnnlim at the Southeasterly or nost Easterly corner of Lot 13 la aald "Pheasant Laan*f thence liorthwesterly alonf the divldlnc line botueen Lots 13 and 14 to the Itortheas Urly or Wat Jiortherly corner of aald Lot 13; the nee Easterly deflectlni; et an ar^le of 127®!*' to the right froa last daacrltad coursa, a Jlatance of 120 feet; U»nce Southaaaterly parallel mth the dividing line between eeid UU 13 end U e diatanee of 200 feel; thence Isateriy deflecting at an ancle of 54®00‘ to the left froa last doaerlteJ course a dletenee of KJ feet thence at a right angle Southerly 75 feet acre or leaa^^^ ***^lJ^the^rt^«aSrly Sporty hea baln^urvo^ aL ■ecuBSote eat ealy ee ahowa. Seals t oats I e t 1" ■ 1»» 7-20-77 Iron aarkar Kli.Cfc.ivi— .'UL C J J942 I SI r* n Oardoa t. Coffin lei Land Surrey and Plnmier Long Lnhe, msaeaoU ■e. 0Ob4 I July 15. 1992 To Whom It May Concern: As an adjacent property owner to the dock aroa at the end of Pheasant Road in Pheasant Lawn, I have no objection to the location of the Bakke dock which borders my property or to any of the other existing docks. Yours truly, ^ Carol Burgess 2800 Pheasant Road Excelsior, MN 55331 471-9357 6) JUL :: i ;992 I MC.O phone: no. STATI OF[M][Mjroso'irzs:^ ^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES METRO WATERS - 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, 772-7910 Mli 55106 file no September 17, 1992 Eugene Strommen Executive Director Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 900 East Wayzata Blvd #160 Wayzata, MN 55391-1857 RE:MULTIPLE DOCK LICENSE, PHEASAl^T LAWN HOMEOWNERS ASSN., PER1«1IT #89-6255, LAKE MINNETONKA (27-133, #9), CITY OF OROHO, HENNEPIN COUNTY Dear Mr. strommen: W© have received a public hearing notice for the multiple dock license application for the Pheasant Lawn Homeowners Association. The applicant was authorized under DNR permit #89-6255 to perform maintenance dredging on the channel providing navigational access to their .ots. However, this permit did not provide for operation of a multiple unit docking facility. A DNR permit is required for mooring facilities that have five or more mooring spaces. The earlier DNR permit, #89-6255, could be amended to allow for this facility or the association may apply for a new permit. We recommend that the earlier pernit be amended since it is a more expeditious process than a new permit application. The applicant should submit a letter to us requesting the amendment, along with a plan showing the dock configuration and a $75.00 amendment fee. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. should you have any questions about this matter, please call me at 772-7910. Sincerely, Ceil dtrauss Area Hydrologist cc:Carman's Bay Ills (17-133, #9) Jo# forrar. Pheasant Lawn Homeowner*e Asscc. 1 StP 181992 L.M.CD. AN LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT TOi Lakt Minnetonka Sun-Sailor for ExceLalor« Minnetonka, Wayeata, and Weatonka editions FAX. 896-4754 FROM* Eugene R. Stromiren Executive Director PHONE* 473-7033 DATE* September 2, 1992 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE PHEASANT LAWN HOMEOWNERS ASSN NEW MULTIPLE DOCK LICENSE The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District will bold a public hearing at Tonka Bay City Hall. 4901 Manltou Rd, Tonka Bay, 7 pm Wednesday, September 23, 1992 for a new multiple dock license application £rum Joe Forrer for Pheasant Lawn Homaownera Association for 6 boat storage unite, Lot 14, Pheasant Lawn. Orono in a lagoon off Carman's Bay. iugene R. Strommen, Executive Director Lake Minnetonka Conservation District ✓ LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Regular Meet injt 7:30 I’M, WcdiieNilay, August 26, 1992 Tonka Day City Mall i| ♦ CALL lO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chair Cochran at 7:40 I’M ROLL CALI. Members Present!>> •David Cochran. Chair. Greenwood; Bert Foster, Wm. A. Johnstone : Scott Carlson. Rober t . Rascop. Park: fora Penn. , Mi fine ton- Treasurer. Shorewood; ronka Boy: Deephaveii: James Grathwol, Excelsior; ka: Michael Bloom. Minnetonka Beach Minnetrista: JoEllen Burr. Or.^no; Douglas Babcock. Secretary. Spiinu George C. Owen. Victoria; Duane Markus, Wayzata; Robert Slocum. Woodland. Also present: Charles LeFevere. Counsel; Sgt. Wm. Chandler. Sheriff’s Water Patrol; Rachel Thibault. Administrative Technician: Eugene Strommen. Executive Director. Member Absent: Ihomas Reese. Vice Chair. Mound. CHAIR announcements The Chair had no announcements. READING OF MINUTES Rascop Moved. Babcock seconded, to approve the minutes of the 7/22/92 Board meeting as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments from persons in attend­ ance not on the agenda. CONSENT AGF:NI)A Foster moved. Babcock setofided. to npprovo the following by unanimous consent: Special Events, Deposit Refunds at $100 each: 1) MN wi Pro Am Baas Tournament. 5/31/92 2) Wednesday Evening Bass Tournaments. 6/3/92 — S/I2/9J 31 Wesionka MDA Brighter Light Baas Open, t/16/92 Motion carried un ntmously. MOTION TO AMEND AGLNDA: Burr moved. Rascop seconded, to i«>v# Agenda Item UNFINI:»HEli BUSINESS. A. Conflict of Interest Policy Statement to precede the I'ommittee Reports. , , •i, DISCUSSION: In response to s question from Babcock as to ine purpose of the motion. Burr staled the conflicl of interest item should be discussed before there was discussion on any other Item on the eiende. Cochran said he would ra'er postpone any discus­ sion until ths occasion ioi a discussion arises. ^ Grathwol. noting he had served »>n the c.Mseilltrr which de­ veloped the conflict of interest statement edopted bv the Board, said he would like to heer Hun's reasoning for discession el this time. Hurr replied that there had been a discession of conflict of interest in connection with an item on Report egenda at the lest SMeiing and she feels it should he discuseed before the reports. Car Ison salw the fact tlidl there Is this discussion means ii should be Isiked tboul note, Buucop said he thought there sou Id he cammente from le^e^etre. I LMCI) HOARD OF DIRECTORS AuRUSt 26. 1992 VOTE: Motion carried, Grathwol. Babcock. Cochran and Stocum voting nay. UNFINTSHEI) HUS I NESS application toA. Conflict of Interest Policy Statement - on-going circumstances. Rascop said the Board has looked into financial considera­ tions as a matter of concern in the past when discussing con­ flicts of interest. He said he has a personal concern t.'^at if a Hoard member has a membership in a corporation or organilation. even though there is no financial gain, there is stiIJ an inter­ est over and above the public good that should be taken into cons i de r.i t ion. LeFtvere proceeded to outline some general ideas <*htch could be of interest to the members. He said the Board is talking about membership in a yacht club on the Lake, in this specific case. It might be helpful to diviae conflict of interest issues into four : I I One c a t e t* o I y i s a s l a t u t o i v c o n f 1 i c i «* f i n t e i e s i . Minnesota statutes prohibit a public bodv from entering into a contract in which one of its members has an interest. That kind of conflict is faced most often city councils. where a city council is proposing to enter into a contract with a business in which n member of the council has sonie direct or indirect inter­ est. This is the only kind of conflict of interest that is dealt with specifically in Ninnesota Statutes. That kind of confl'Cl it not what the Board is talking about. 2) another conflict of interest is that of inconpalih|e of­ fices. Under that doctrine it is not proper for a public offi­ cial to hold two offices which by their nature are incompatibie. The Attoiney General has ruled, for example, that the oltices of school board member and city council eiefliber are incompatible. If a school board member takes a seat on a citv council, that awmber automat i ca I I y forfei s its seat on the school board. The BoariJ is not talking about *hat type of conflict. 31 There is inither category of conflict of interest lhail IS an ethical or po'.'iiical type. This involves a perception of fairness, a quest ion of perception of public trust and a confi­ dence in the decisiors made by the public officials. It is not a legal conflict of interest ii that a member of a b«»ard la dis­ qualified or that a member has committed a crime, or tfat aw action of a board can be reversed because of participation. Ihi* is a mailer of proprletv. I am no more qua*ified to pasa iuda- ment on a matter ethics than env other meadier of a hoard, so | will not trv to do that. 41 What the Board ia left with is tha commom la* doctriae of conflict of loteresi. In wiwnesota there la ware little auidsnce* even in case la». Put in a number of Minnesota cases, the •upieaw Court and the court of Appeals have recoaaiied that If a mesdier has a sufncieai laterest he/she ought not be uuall- f«ed to vole. - ettn t I I.MCU IJOAKU UF DlRKC'iOKS I e Ft* VC re c«)ntlnue<l that the conflict o f AuKUst 26, 1092 j f 11 c r e s t policy statement adopted by conflict of interest it IS somewhat of an been just q handful have ruled that even the ho.ir<l general IV deals with tlnit type of , and is consistent with the law. although over simplification of the la»». There have of cases i fi Minnesota in winch the c u r t s tlu)uah there is nothing in the statutes, the couita will step in and say it is improper for a hoard member to have vote<l. At the outset I can say sot a where the courts have qualified when o member has In other words, everything I I am not aware of any ca ;e in Minne- ruled that someone ought to be dis- an interest which is not |*ecuniary. have found in case law has indicated that that interest has to be pecuniary. It has to be of finan­ cial or economic benefit to the hoard member for disqualification to occur. In cases where there is not a pecuniary interest, any alleged conflict could be a matter of ethics or propriety of the act. but would not be illeeal conflict of interest. Lelevere continued that there ore three cases that he would call to the Board’s attention that he thinks miaht tell how a court might have viewed such a conflict of interest. In one case a city council acted on a vai i.ance a|>pl ication for i cfiuicli. <uie of the council members was a contributing membe»- of that church. It w’os for an ordinary expansion of the church’s pitysical plant. The court concluded that there was nothing improper about that, at least in the legal sense. That action was not a basis for decision and the court took no action. They that there was no reason mere membership in the sufficient to justify overturning the decision overturning the simply concludeii organ i 7 4tl ion was of the city council. Froliahly the leading case, the one that in citevi most^olCon. was Lenz vs. the Coon Creek ttatersbed District, in rtp”. The Minnesota Supreme Court laid out some standards to consider In deciding whether there was imf»ropor conflict. Reading from this case tells where the court was coming from. This language has been cited. I think, in every case since this case, as guidance to the courts in deciding if c»>nflict exists. "The puipose behind the creat ion i^f a rule which would disqualify public officials from i»ailicif>aling in proceed­ ings in a decision making capacity when they have a direct interest in its ouico».'’e is to ensure their decision will not be an arbitrary reflection of their own selfish inter­ est. there is n»»t a general rule as to whether *iich an interest will disqualify an official. Each case must be decided on the basie of the particular factors present. Aiming l lie factors to he cunsideieJ in making the deltrmioa- t I on are: 1) 1hg nature of the decision being made 2t The nature of the pecuniary interest The number of the ullicialt making the de«iei.»n. LMCD BOARD OF niRKCTORfi August 26, 1962 4) 'I'he M(L*e:l to have interesle<l persons make I lie ilecision 5) The otlicr means available, if any, such ns the opportu­ nity for review that serves to ensure that the officials will not act arbitarily to serve further their selfish interest." That case involved a decision by a Watershed District to construct a major ditch improvement. Some of the official.s owned a considerable amount of real estate in the di.strict which would be substantially benefited by the proposed improvement. Never­ theless. a court found that under those circumstances and apply­ ing that standard of review, there was not a sufficient need for the court to create a rule disqualifying those officials from acting. Even though they had an interest in that case, the court substantial property would not disqualify them from acting. There were some factors there that may have Influenced the court. The court was not very helpful in explainine which f.iciois were mo.st important. One of the factors, however, was that in order for the project to go forward there was a need for the manavers to make a decision. There would not have been enoueh raanacers lell to make a decision it they had been reciuired to be disquali­ fied. It is quite clear that in that balnncine analysis, it is quite possible for someone to have a f a i r I >' substafitial pecuniary interest and .still not be d i .squa I i I i ed under Minnesota law. A more recent .Supreme Court case of I9.S5 was a case in which a liquor license renewal was denied. One of the councilmeml»ers had a piece of pro|ierty across the .street from the liquor estab­ lishment. That counc i I member had stated as a matter of public record that the firesence of the liquor es t ab I i shmii t diminished the value of his property by $100,000. The .Sufiremc Court held that his participation in that process was a direct, obvious and flagrant conflict of interest, disqualify inc that party from liquor license application for th.at estab- ho owned that property a any As future long as acting on I ishment. exist . feEcvere s.nid in an appIt ca tion before per so, V o t i n u . conflict would a club that h.as is not enoueli. summary that membership in this !)ody, in his opinion if that is the only factor, to disqualifv someone from It is not II legal conflict of interest. However, there may be circumstances in any given case where a person could have a direct interest, a pecuniary interest, which would leHiili in lh«*l person being disqualified. Vou can take as an example a yacht club, a non-profit organilaiion. whicn has ten members. If the license is ei.inted Ih.st allows the club to bni'c ten slips, •$ offe'S considerable economic value. If the license is not eranl- ed. the members would have on Iv one iberefoie. thr ia»ue to the individual boarti member is fairly direct and fairlv obei- out and results in a fatrlv large ec»»noMic beM'iii. In ibnt case, it IS not the siere membership in the club which raises I Iie» conflict ol intereal. flie finding that that person a pecttniarg interest in havine that application granted is suffi­ cient iy direct that il Is fair to state I ha I I heir judcaeni mmf lie clouded in acting fairly on the api»l real'•’a. LMCl) UOAKD OF UIKKCTOKS Auj'.ust 26, 1992 In our case. I do not know what all the facta arc. other than that several of the board iiiciiibers are niembers of the yacht club. Given that fact alone. I would not be of t lie opinion, if that were the only fact presented to the court, that the court would lule that an improper conflict of interest exiateil. There may be other facts out there. Those are facts that I do not have any knowledge of. So I caruiot real lv render an opinion. It may be better to discuss that matter first. There is no guidance or judgment in any of the municipal law treatises that I have found and consulted as to what a body can do when a conflict of interest situation arises. In other words, if u body concludes that a conflict of interest exists, there is no guidance as to what tliat body can do about it. There is no stated authority anywhere for a body to state that those people may not be fieard in discussion or that their votes may not be counted. A hoard can get into some very questionable arca.s about what the authority of the board is. There are very difficult ques­ tions about the authority of the board to disenfranchise one community or take away their right to vi>te <»n an application be­ cause the public boily thinks there in.-iy be a conflict ol itilerest situation. It would be nice if we didn’t have to get to those issues. I do not know if this is a case where address them. That would be a difficult mine feel our way throuah. Cochran said he does not feel the Conflict ject can he discussed without getting into the specifics of a case. He suggested proceeding with the agendri .and then tiiscuss Conflict of Interest when it arises. Hurr responded that the Board voted to discuss the issue. Bloom said his under3tanding of the motion is for discussion for all matters brouaht before the Board, not just one. Hurr said the motion was to hear ol»jec- tions to the policy itself. Carlson said he believes the policy is firmly in place. For the record he stated he does not the Board wants to tell members how to vt)le. He does not anyone's miritl is going to be changed by the discussion. •aid he would rather discuss this topic before going on agenda. ... . .Hurr stated she sat on the committee at which the policy was determined bv consensus. The committee was dealint with the public perception of the appointed members of the Board. she does not believe I.eFevere spoke direct I v ti» the policy the LMCD has. .she so id Hi** sintewent deals with court cases. I.rivvere responded that in Conlli^l ol Itilvresi eitwatioris, an economic *»r i.ecuniary benefit, if diieci or indnect. is Impermisab I•. He said he was focusing on whether It was pecuni- we will have field for us to t O' of Interest sub- be I ieve be Iieve n.'ibcock to the ary Hurr asked for .sn c*i»lan it ion of pecuniary, is dee Mill with direct of indirect pereonal financial fa in. ,Mgai LMCD nOARI) OF DIRRCTORS AuKuat 26, Muir said financiai gain, wtiutiicr $1 or $M)o. is a relative thing. Murr asked the executive director for his comments. The executive director said the policy was arrived at after a fairlv long discussion with several community leaders and members of the Board. He does not believe he should comment on the fH)licy or this discussion as he is not a Board member. He did state he was enlightened by what he has heard from the attorney so far. Cochran referred to the last pajagraph of the Policy which refers to the National League of Cities Standards of Conduct ft Guidelines for Government Decision Makers. This fits in with dealing with the perception of conflict. LeFcvere added that no one can control the perception of a conflict in the mind of the public and press. Lelevere suggested assuming a case that is not a legal violation of the I.MCD policy. If it is not a legal conflict of interest the Board does not have the authority to refuse to allow someone to partici|)ate in the discussion. The Board does not have the authoritv to sav people cannot vote. It is not a legal conflict of interest just because the Board believes it is not ethical or believes it may not be proper. The Boattl canrjot decline to count the v»»tes. The Boaid could censure the meunber or adopt a Resolution of Findings that the policy was violated. Those aie things that woul<l he within the authority of the Board. Penn said the Board fieeds tt> lt>ok .at the conflict o( inter­ est policy as it applies to a case. He i>eisonally looks at it as It applies to the Wavzata Yacht Glub. He has knowledge that members of the LNB'D Boord of Directors belong to the Wayzata Yacht Club. He dt)t*s not know if they peisonallv gain financial­ ly. However, if the public perceives that the Board has not acted in the public interest, then the perception of a conflict of interest exists. He docs have questions about the I.MCD Conflict of Interest Policy Statement. Even though someone does not fiiin personally by voting, it is necessary for each meml»er to ask him/herself if the public p«f ion is harmed if hc/she votes on that issue. He woulti hope each memfier of t fie Bi>ard woulil person­ ally ref lain from voting if there is a public neiccplion of conflict even though there is no legal violation. Babcock said rattier than let the public drive the IMCD policy, the Board shoulil educate the miblic of press th.it i«s| being a laciuber of #i yacht clul> should noi pi«'bil»it votine. .im«I mi doing th.ii the f’ublic |»erception would chniit'e. Penn leBpoiided that whether legal or not. the perception is iwpuilaiit to the community. Markus texak escept i»»n to Bahttick’s stiilemviH. He said It appears to h iis the Board would be educatine the public rather than nanaiine the lake. He tt»e«l the V.sviata Tachl flub proposal at .in example of a pusaiblc benefit »c I he ormbrrs hAs««l «*n a fininiiai benefit I»» the flub through the Lake Minnetonka S.siling iciHMal. AS well as a future increase in the au»h«r of promi on Way/AtA Bav. Blocun olfiected to eatendine the discuaalon to aiNtcliice. LMCD BOARD OF DIKFX’TORS August 20, 1992 f' 41-' the responsi- the presenta- is honest and Carlson said any perception of a conflict of interest dam­ ages the Hoard’s ability to manage the Lake. It is his belief that nieinbers must be more careful in their actions as appointed officials because the public has no recourse. He said there are higher standards to be met when one is api>ointed than when elect­ ed. One thing to be considered is if there is a need for that person to vote on an item when there could be a perception of a con f1ic t. Grothwol said he is personally concerned with ethical ques­ tions. When appointed he took an oath involving public trust. The people who appointed him expect him to accept hility. Each member should talk to and listen to tions, seriously, and then vote what they feel t rue. Bloom said it is his belief members should hold to a high standard. This discussion is talking about ethical appearance of impropriety which are per.soiuil ilecisions. He a.sked the Board to proceed to the agenda. MOTION: Rascop moved. Carlson seconded, to close the discus­ sion. to leave the LMt 1) Conflict of Interest Policy Statement as it is and to allow the members to use tlieii own conscience when VOIina. DliSCUSSlON: Markus suggested asking each meml)er about membership in the Wayznta Yacht Club when action i .s culled for on the Club’s request. Babcock questioned who has the responsibility to bring a conflict of interest to the Board’s attention. Rascop called the question, stating the discussion was not pertinent to t lie mot ion . VOT'li: Motion carried unanimously. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1 WATER STRUCTURES, Chair Babcock A. Approval of Minutes Babcock moved. Rascop seconded, to approve the minulei of the Water Structures Committee of 8/15/92 with t h^ followinf corrections: Page J - First paiagiaph - Correct spelling - Don Rloser Page J Last four lines to read: At the s.iwc time, fishing boats stored in the water will have to be counietl. eseeedtww-the Grathwol expressed cpli- miam In finding a solution to the problem with the b»»at rental a me n i ( y . Pate 4 First sentence, secofoi p-trstiaph lo read: Ihtre was no action reqatfed at this time. Page n Last sentence l.xst |♦ar/«lfIaph to read: Rascop sug- geated looking at the 198J Report of tfie l.ake Mi niielunka Task fOfc«. Motion carried unanlwottaly. I.MCU nOAKI) OF DIRFCTORS August 26, 19'J2 tfic coininit- X 84 * tlock said it was clock asked need any more api>) icat ion to tee voted on a H. Multifile Dock License? Renewals — coniftiiitce reconitncnd i nf; approvai. I) Way/ata Yacht Club-Site 2, Wayzata May. Wayzata MOTION: Uabcock moved. (Jiathwol seconded, to a improve the Water Structures Committee recommendation for approval of the Wayzata Yacht ('luh-Sitc? 2 amendment with a ttew site plan ^eplncin^t the platform on the island with a seasonal dock 6’ wide x 40* Iona, noting tlwit no boat storage is allowed at this dock. DISCUSSION: Babcock said it was his impression titat tee had agreed u|»on a (> ’ x 84’ dock to replace the 24 previously approved in IP86. Cochran and OratliMol their recollection the ajiproval was for the b' x 40“ for in the application. It is a seasonal dock. Don Blaser. Wayzata Yacht Club, said their 19Sb application cal led for a 24* x 84’ dock. It was not bui It because the need did mit exist. Currently the WVC would like approval for the 6* X 84’ so they could build it as tjceded. Ihis year they do not th/in ti * X 40*. Cochran suggested amending the a b' X 84’ dock. Ilurr resfionded that the coimnit- 40’ (lock and that is wb.it the WN«’ .ipplicd lor. It is her feeling that the applicant should have to come back to the committee for a change. She said this also raises the question of the Board approving a dock that may not be built to full size. MOTION CIIANOK: Babcock and (ir.ithwol aareed to ch.intre t lie dock dimension in the motion from b* x 4o’ to 6* x .84’. accepting Slocum’s suggestion to add "to meet proffer setb.icks. IHSCUSSION: Jo.h'islone asked if there is any significant public policy involved in the length change. Babcock said the dock size conforms to the ordinance at 40’ or 84’ as lone os it meets setback requirements. blaser explained the dock is used bv the Lake Minnetonk.a Sailing School as a mukc-ready dock. The boats are stored on land. No boats are storcil on the dock overnight. M.sikus asked about the density increase to the wvf license when the Sailing School bool count increases to as many as 80 boats. a> mentiontol by Blaser. Blaser said the boats are used by n - *4 year old children for sailing instruction and the boat count will only increase as the demand for lessons increases. Not all of the boats will be in the water -st one time. Blaser added that there is absolutely no flow of funds from the Luke Mi line tonka Sailing School to the WY<*. Blaser added th.it this in a f.icilitv th-il the WYC allows the Sailing School to use free of choree. Responding to n question f i om tlrnthwol. l-oster sold thete are tfiree sailitis •choois on the Lake. Iefevere raised an issue, not necessaiily relitive to this opplication. but one everyone should be mindful of. That 4a the laattt of oil lake storage and the number of hosts tH»t c t'’ »*e stored off lake under the cuirent I’ode. This application does not change the number ol boats stored off L."ikr. 4 be off lake atoiage Ordin.ifue it severely restrictive. I he applicnnt ought not asaume. under current i>rdinanett. that they tan increase the number of eatercr.ift stored off the Lake above the nusdver in this apfil lest ion . LMCIJ HOAKU OF UIKFLTOKS 2(», 19^2 Penn asked how the island got there. Babcock i •.•sponded it was an existing island, added to by dredging. Hurr asked why the WYC was linking the application when the dock was for the Sailing School’s use. Babcock said that is because the WYC holds the license for the boats stored at the location. LeFevcre added that the District should not have more than one license for one site so one person is responsible for activities. MOTION: Babcock moved. Grathwol seconded, to amend the Wayzata Yacht Club-Site 2 Multiple Dock License renewal with a new site plan replacing the platform on the island with a seasonal dock 6* wide X 84’ long, to meet all setback requirements, noting that no boat storage is allowed at this dock. VOTE: There were “! ayes. Ilurr. Penn. Owen. Markus and Carlson voting nay. foster abstaining. Motion carried. 2) North Shore Drive Marina, Maxwell Bay. orono. MOTION: Babcock moveil. Penn secomled. to amend the North Shore Drive Marina Multiple Dock License with the 8 lagoon slips as transient, 4 of the remaining 85 slips for service as needed, cont'iisent on the applicant being in compliance with Orono’s code requirement s. DlSt’USSION: Babcock suggested amending the motiofi to change ccHtt ingent or\ ihq appl it;ant ilftllLg ill £.QLnJ2liiia^ 'UJh Qronol? code requIrement s to "The LMCD recognizes in approving this license that North Shore Drive Marina should meet its responsibilities w'ith other agencies having jurisdiction over the marina s actii>ns on the Lake", as done in a previous license approval. Hurr. speaking against the change in the committee recommenda t i oir. .said a Wayzata Yacht Club license was contingent upon a valid <UP issued by the City of Wayzata. Babcock cited the case of Gayle’s Marina where approval was not subject to a Minnehaha Creek Water­ shed District IMCWD) issue about dredging. Hurr resf)onded that the City of Orono is a contributing financial member of the LMCD. The Gayle’s Marina matter was a different issue as tlie MCWD is not a member of the IM<T). Thibnult commented that the City of Wayzata asked the LMCD to wait until a Conti i I i ona I Use I'eimil was in effect. 1 he City of Orono hts not specifically nsketl the IMCD not to take action. In response to a question from foster about what should be put on the I.MCD licenses in cases such as this, lefeterr said l lie Board has broad discretion as to what to with this kind ol issue. fo lake a hard line, the Code requires that construction of commercial multiple docks muil comply witli all local, state ami federal regu I .i t i ons. municipal foning. parkin* iml other land use regulations applicable to the facility. If the l‘«»aid » inted to. It coulil refuse to grant the application on the grounds that it was inconsistent with city cmie requirements. It would not be improper lor the Board to do that. The Hooid h.is the authority within the c»>de. Their have been cases in the i*a>.t when H h «'» been done. The Board could have upheld a Gayle’s Manna license denial. There is a practical cons ide i at ion. The *^'** •*■[ * licanae application because it is not coitslsleni "ith the zoniiig up«»n advice by the t* 11 y, The existing facility •ay coot n ue to operate. If so. the Board baa no leserage becau-^e the LMCD nOARI) OF D .RKCTORS AUKU^t 26, 1692 Ihf I.MCD thc-n has the* cunsci|uencc* t>f for the Uoaril to District has no authority other than to charpe the facility witli operating without a license. That forces the District into the position of enforcing the city’s zoning code, to foot the hill for the litigation. That is denying a license for non-lake related 'ssues. L e F e V e r e c o n t i rui e d that it is i mo r t a n t determine what the city’s objections are and wliether or not they are related to the F.MCD’s responsibilities. On the other hand, if the reason for the city asking for denial is something like interfering with public lake access or blocking a channel or the criteria the Hoard looks at in granting or denying a multiple dock license, there is more reason for the LMCD to rely on local zoning codes. LeFevere said the proposed language in the motion does not support the city in agreeing to litigation or to prose­ cute c»r carry the city’s burden. The proposed language formally recognizes that the city has jurisdiction over this matter and it has the right to enforce its own restrictions. Ihe I.MCD's prant- a license in no wav affects the city’s right to enforce its1 ng hecfi cases where the c ooF’C * a l i V e I y i ii a n is movitrg away from own regulations. LeFevere said there have munici|>al borly ami the LMCD have worked enforcement action. Hurt said the motion before lire Board cooperating witfi the cities. Carlson quest iorred what official notification is necderl from a city. Me suggest e<l adt*pting a policy as to whom the District listens, for an official position. LeFevere said there is no provisioti as to what is oflicial. Babcock responded tliat the cities <lo not want the LMt D to act above the 626.4 oilWL. Bloom wondered if this motion is suggesting ft change from there being nothing to prohibit a city from having stricter requirements than the LMCD. LeFevere said it is a matter of Bi>ard discretion. It raises the question as to what the city staff should do. Should they start prosecution the U.'iy after the license is issued, should they formally reply that the license is not in compliance with the city code so licen.se revo­ cation proceedings can be started or will it be ignored until it comes up again. Foster exi>ressed his concern that the Board would be tssuine Q license with the knowledge of non-comp I i line e with the city ordinances. Babcock said if the 'itv of i rme to the IMs- Irici and s.aid it has a serious |Mtd>lem with co«f»l lanco with i t .s ordinance, he would not have a probleie in coopeiatine with the city. He asked if this compliance iesuc applies to new licenses or renewals. LeFevere responded that it appliei to all fun me. Tfie problem is that it draws the LM<U i r* t o areas iU.%% are not applicable to the I M« D chat it* regarding the lake. M is neces- aaiy to ari.slvre coaipliance with local regulations as they relate to the standards of interest to ihe »o»rd Baheotk said this de- Miinds the I Mi'ti lake action before a city does. Oahriel Jahbour. Ofono City Counc i I eewbe r . said Ihe l» ahoulU put the cities on notice that they should do ewe thing about their shoreline ordinances. Me said there should he €«•- pliance with court orders affecting ane ■artna. i.ekeveie le- viewed the hit tote of the LMcD lMig.stM»n with Worth ghore !»• lee LMCU BOARD OF DlKliCiURS AII u s t 26, 1992 I.Mri) deny we re t lie Marina resultin^i in a court rulinp that recjuiri-'ii ilie marina to briny its docks back to 200’ from 300’. There was later action by the LMt.’D which allowed Noilh Shore Drive Marina to have more dry slack storage than allcwed by the court order. The Board, not aware of the Oronc court order, '.e I t it could not that one marina something that other marinas on the Lake allowed. Hurr and Jabbour said there were I vo court orders one discussed by the committee is an Order it.volvinv the Marina and the City of Orono. Babcock said li i s conc-rn is where the LMc:D would have an exf'osure to enforce someone e.'se’s code. He believes the city should enforce its code first. VOTE: Motion ca»ried unanimously. Grathwol suggested finding alternatives to the stipulations attached to licenses. Cochran said the LMCD shoultl require com­ pliance with tho.se items that relate to water and dock use. The committee was asketl to reconimend wiirdinv to cover cunt ingencies involving runing. Owen was excused. 3) .Shorewood Yacht Club, tiideon’s Hay. ShorcwiuHl MOTION: Babcock moved. Kascop seconded, to appiove renewal of the Shorewood Yacht Club Multiple Dock License, without change. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. 4) Methodist Lakeside Assembly, Way rat a Bay. Wood­ land MOTION: Babcock moved. Slocum seconded, to amend the Multiple Dock License of the Methodist Lakes’de Assembly trading 5 moor­ ings from the District Mooring Area (DMA) for 5 boat lifts at the deck, per site plan dated 2/3/92. amending the length from bO’ to 100’ and moving ) slips from docks on the west to the main dock, subject to the east setback of 30’ being met. amending the DMA from 7 moorings to 2. J)lSCU.S.SION: Kascop asked about the swimming platform location. Thibault responded that the Water Patrol has been asked to check the locition. She said it appcnis. from the iliawing submitted, that the swimming platforms are further out than ion . Babcock asked if ns-buill surveys arc required. Thibault responded that they itie not required for seasonal docks. AMENDMENT TO MOTION: Penn moved. Hurr seconded, to require that the swimming platforms be brought in to the 100* rone. DISCUSSION: I'ochran said it is his understand trie that the W.iler Patrol issues permits for structures such as swimming pl.ilfv*rms. Babcock asked if there is an ordinance coverine this t % r»r of structirv. LeFevere res|*on«!etl tb-»l they Fiave to be in the lH»ck Use Area IIUA) or he grandfathered. Hr added, in resp«»nse to • question from Mocum. that the IH'A is the determining houn.lirv. not the DMh. rhe Dt A the area in which the ri pari an owner conducts all kinds of activities such as host storage, swiiiming platforms. «nd water ski jumps. Chandler «»ld. in issuing per- mitn. the Hater Petrol looks ai the ItiO* aie* md the mmeigaliom • tea * I 1 I,MCI) nOAKI) OF DIUHCTOKS AUKUSt 2L», IV92 VOTE ON AMENDMENT: Motion carried, Grathwoi. Foster and Cochran voting nay. VOTE ON MOTION AS AMENDED: Motion carried unanimously. C. I’erniancnt Dock Definition. MOTION: Hahcock moved. Hun seconded, to ai>provc preparation of a Code amendment adopting the MN DNR definitions for permanent dock and seasonal dock. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. 2. ENVIRONMENT, Cna i r llurr A. Water Quality Monitoring Study Progress. Hurr annouficetJ the ne.\t meeting of liie corninitiec studyina water qualiiy monitor- ina will he held 9/15/9>. Hurr announced a monitoring program will begin in early spring with the cooperation of the Freshwater Icundaiiofi. the Lake Minnetonka Lnfeshore Owners Association and the LMCD. Ihere will he .1 iraininv session for the people who will iiecome the monitors at the lt»rd Fletcher’s dock. Sntuiday. uclohcr .). 10 AM. There will be scientific people there to give assistance. Hurr invited any interested members to part icipate witli tlicm to show LMCD support. H. Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force, Chair Penn Penn reported the harvesting has been completed for 1992. About .100 acres of milfoil was harvested. «onsultant Robert IMerce. ctimiucting the program evaluation. is givins the conunit- tee interesting numbers on the rulormance of Hic crews, a copy furnished to the members. The equipment down tire was twice that of |99|. (It should be noted that 1991 was a shortened cutting program using a l>arge f»’r of f-I oa<l i ng. I The crews d.*d a quality joh of 5; tling as much done as they did in spile ol tsv cquipmetil proble^a. Penn commended the executive director and Prograai Superv'vo? Mike Friedbe.g for the work they did. Tne lMCD has been granted funds for harvesting for l'“^3 and for Sonar use in the proposed St. Alban’s Bay trealwent for 199.1 from the Hennepin county Poanl of <’om« i as i one r s through! the Hennepin County .Soil and Water Conservation District in the amounts of tSo.OUO for milfoil harvesting and $l4.n«'o tow.nd i he Sonar studv. Penn believes these grants will mtan that the cities will have to pay less in I99J. I he City of Deephaven and the Citv of Wav/aia alec received matchine gf.int funding. The fWM la^k force will SHtei on friday. Augusi JH. fherg will be a '•peiial p r r <*en t a t i on by the DNR ihiel of icolotical Serviegg. Lee Pfannmulfer. John Bar ten. Hennepin Parka, will alee the first Scientific eub-ctwaaii t t e« repmrt. there wi 1 I I a I s«» t>« an update on the fit Alban’s bav aqu.it ic plant inventory in preparation for the proposed Sonnr treatment. Carlson asked about a rev 1 tied budget fi»r tile cM»us tn light of the Milfoil grant. the eteculive Uirectiti -.aid tlwrr# oill bo a review of the budfel. 1 4 f- LMCU bOAKD OF UIRtCTOKS AilRUSt 26, 19*J2J. LAKE ACCESS TASK FORCE, Chair Grathwol Regarding Agenda Items A, HI. ami C. Griithwol submitted Q revised report of the Data Gathering Subcommittee meeling of 8/12/92. A revised draft of the proposed parking standards for Lake Minnct nka Public Accesses and n revised rept>rt from the Lake Access Task Force Uata/Standards Subcommittee showing the current and potential car/trailer parking. These amended drafts replaced mtilt-ial mailed with the agenda. Grathwol said the subcommittee will meet n 9/9 to review the drafts. Upon approval, there will be a Task Force meeting in October. Grathwol said the subcomraittco may hove some additional options along with Maxwell Day to considtr at the Lake Access Task Force October meelina. Gabriel jabbour commended the executive director for his assistance in gaining consensus at the subcommittee meetings. lie cited this as an example of how cities can be brought together to cooperate. 4. LAKE USE ANU RECREATION, Chair Foster A. Minutes. Foster moved. Penn seconded, to approve the minutes of the Lake Use and Recreation Committee of R/17/92 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. B. Lights at Narrows Channel MOTIONi Foster moved. Penn seconded, to approve installation of the lights ot the Narrows Channel according to the 8/4/92 memo from Hennepin County Lake Improvements, the lights to be oper.it- tng only during the boating season, and to thank Hennepin County for its cooperation. VOTE: Motion carried un.m imo» sIy. nffimpin County Sheriff’s Water Patrol Rcporl Sgt. Chandler reported as follows: • There was a drowning involving lnto.x lest ton as » slfnifi- csnl factor. There are no charges pending among the sureivin# parties. Milfoil was not a contributing factor. Milfoil did hindar the divers in their body search. • There have been 4*J BWI’e among all water bodie* in Mennw- pln County. • There have been a sitnificant number of thefts r rom watercraft m the Lafayette Bay eree. A more detailed report was aiade perl uf the rile. I.MCI) BOARD OF DIRF.CTORS August 20, FINANCIAL KFPORTS, Treasurer Carlson A. Juiy Slatemenl of Cash Transactions B. Audit of V'ouchers for F^ayment F40TI0N: Carlson niovetl. Penn seconded, to .approve the July state­ ment of cfisFi transactions and order it filed. To .approve payment of bills in the .amount of $7 1,484.56 . Check Nos. 8689 ttirough 8776. DISCUSSION: Carlson pointed out the list of bills inclu<led the last payment for the milfoil harvest ina prosmin. I he executive director said the |).iyaient to U i occfi t r i c. Inc. is the sccotul payment for tlic l,.'»ke Use Density Studv. Mariius asked about contracting wi1outside services for the harvestinv vs. using LMCt) employees. The executive director responded that w.ss flone in 1989 and using LMCD employees is more cost effective. VOTE: Motion can led unanimously. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT. Stroinmen A. The <iala I(»r the ho.it storage inventory is still heinv processed for the September meeting. A preliminary count of docks with .1 ard 4 boats was submitted to the "Dock” cofamittee in August . . B. The Multiple Dock inspections will be c«'mpleted this Week. C. Strommen complimented HoI» Pierce for the expertise he has brought to the District. Pierce will he convertine previous reports lo a new coraputor-fenerfiled summ.'iry he has prepared for comparison purposes. Pierce is also monitoring the eutj:i»ment needs. D. A nrOB I ess report was received this mornine from Biocen- Iric. Inc. There are three more flights to he done, which will meet the contiacl i equ i .. ^len t s of 20. The occess usei question­ naire Interview portion of the study has been compleled. fochran noted that some of the lata froei those reports will be useful for the Lake Access Committee. P. .StroMMKtt distributeil the meeting schedule for .September. The LW'D office will be closed. Friday. September 4. for a staff floatIng bo IidaV . sirommen comp I imenteil the lioartl on bow itioe h.inuteu ffio conflict of Interest SMlter. NEW BiiaiNrss A. lAppoIntBe*iI of Ni»minafinR f'usimitteo Cochran 'piKitfiled the following lo the mmiioat ine le report at the feptem»*ei meet inf: •coll CarlscMi. (‘hair Robert Slocum Robert Reacop Perl Poaler 11 lee. t • BOARD or DIKKCTORS August 20, 1992 ADJOUKNMKNT Cochran declared the meeting adjourned at 10:10 P. M. David Cochran. Chair Douglas Babcock. Secretary I • •• 4 Jr li- RAFI I.AKK MINNI-TONKA CONSIiK VAT I ON mSIRICr Action Report:Water Structures Committee MeetIng:7;J0 AM. Saturday. Septemliei 12. Norwest Hank Huildiii>2. Wayzata. Room IJ5 Members Present: Doualas Habcotk. Chair. Spring Park: Robert Slocum. Woodland: James Giathwol. Kxcelsior: Scott Carlson. Minnetrista; William Johnstorje. Mirnietonka: Robert Rascop. .Shore- wood. Also present: Rachel ThibauJt. Administrative Technician: Eugene Strommen. Executive Director. The meetintt was called to order at 7:40 AM by Chair Habcock. 1. Chapman Place Marina Variance Application, Cooks Hay, Mound The commit tee received the report ol the Public lleariritf held on 8/2t>/'*2 to ci>nsiiler the a|)pl ie.it ii'ii of Minnetonka Dock Serv­ ices. Inc. for Chapman Place Marina for a dock lenelh %’ar lance for an additional 26 feet, for a total dock lenclh of 155 feet into the Lake. rhe Public Heaiina reiJort included findinas. Attached to the report are the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of a public heariig held on J/23/88. with the Order apiMoved 2/22/8" at which time Chapman Place received a multiple dock license to replace the previous dock license helil by the Surlsitle Supper Club. I he committee also received a letter from the Department of Natural Resources advisina that the apfilicaiit will be required to ameml DNR permit iHU-6.)U7. if the extension is approved. The applicant submitted a revised draw me of the proposed dock dated 9/10/92 sliowinR the water depths taken at 928.83 water elevation. In presentina the ma t e ria I. T hibau11 said t he r r are no increases in slip a ires on the firoposed site plan and the density •tthiasiteisl:5’. Babcock expressed concern about set tine .i precedent ^by allowina the grind falhe red waflna to move further into the too’ - 200* rone. Before mnkine a decision be wi»ul<l ennt to have n de t e r m i It a t i o ti w s to what hardship exists. Habcock me n 1 i o it e dl Uavle's Marina as having a depth oioblem. B.abcock renewed the historv of the docks from the Surlside io8‘ dock Icneth with 44 • lips to the re-arrangement for t'bapm.in Placa of 12" «tock lengtii wi th 27 s I I ps, ^ j Carlson said he woulil like to pear what har^fships are in- vrived to justify a variance. As examnlea. he mentioned whether It ia a unmue ailwation. the laotivatlon |oi t lie chanee. anv finsnclal reasons. fte would like to see a varianca criteria clteck-lisi Micludine whether anv hardship was created hv act ion of the appI leant ....the exetutire director esplained that t*Picallv a Iipa ate allowed J* of water depth, hearlaa in •i.*d that the water level cueld decirase durina the veer aa mmeh as a.:e foot or more. It is necessary to tonsider the fact that m%rin%* ha%e contracts to fwiniah a aereice fof the f«M season. H Is a I .o neces^atv to WATI-R STUnCTURf-S COMMITTKE September 12, 19U2 provitif navigational room around the docks. In response to the mention of Gayle’s Marina, the executive director «ai«l GayU-s is limited to a 200* dock because of the location at the channel. The 200* dc>ck limit and chnnrtel caused (»nyU*'s to «hedpc. As far as a s e I f - i riipos ed hardship, in tlie case of chafiman Place, the rip-rap was installed to prevent erosion. f'hapman Place had the proper DNR and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permits. The rip-rap was done within the DNK allowance which requires a dis­ tance rjot exceed 5’ from the OHWI. to the toe of the ri|>-rap. tiralhwol said he can see flexibility in lerantirm licenses to marinas between 100' and 200*. treating the applications on a onc-by-one basis. He feels that would keep the marinas operating arid maintain the outside limit of 200*. Slocum noted the Chapman Place docks are already beyond 100*. Me suggested an extension to 1.10* based on the rip-rap iesp«oideil that he would base his ilce is ion than the rip-rap. Slocuia said he views to the Lake. Slocum seconded, to recommend approval variance from Minnetonk.i l)(»ck Services. taking up 10’. p.ihcock on water ilepths rather the I ip-rap as a benefit MOTION: Grathwol moved, of the a|>i« I j ca t i on lor a Inc. for Chapman Place Marina to extend the docks an additional 26* for a total dock length of 155'. The Findings are to include the need to obtain navigability, the change in woter level since the original af)plication in a low water year ntui the reason for changing the walkway because of the rip-rap. Dl S(!IJS.S ION: Carlson expressed his belief that the I MCf) does not have to provide s 1 i i>s for the largest boat possible. Pahcock said he woulil hesitate t<» chanee the s M |> sizes from the compromise reached when the slips were reduced from 44 to 27. Grathwtil expressed mixed feelings in that he lielicves mari­ nas should be al lowed to operate ns they desire, within the I imi­ tations of the license. At the same time he has a ptoblem with developing slips for 32' boats to the exclusion of smaller boats. He feels the LMCD has a responsibility to see that there are services available for different types of boats. He saiil there should be a requirement that a marina provide the slip service based on a percentage available to. for example. 20* boats and fish Ins boats MOTION: P.sbctfck nmvecl. Orathwol seconded, to table the applica­ tion of chnpnan Place to the next meeting. Ci>Hunerits on the api*licatlon are to be requested frosi the Citv of Mound. YOTH; Motion carried. Carlson and Rascop voting nay, 3. UrafI oriJinifice Helatipn to the Effect on Licenses i»f Failure to construct tieenaed Doefes within a Specif ir»l I’iae, AaenUing LMCD Code 8ect. 3.05. Babcock appointed JoKlIen Mutr. O|oo« ss i‘ha i r of a sut»*- comnitiee to look at abanilonment of facilities and lack of con­ struction of new faci lilies. Babcock will a«rve «’n the eiib- coMittee and will eoMcii aeahers at 'he next Board •eelins. water STRirCTUKES COMMITI'I-K September 12, !‘.»y2 3. tiinft of Ordinance Amending definitions of permanent and seasonal docks, adopting DNR definition as directed by the Itoard. The committee received a draft of a proposed ordinance to adopt the DNR definition of a seasonal dock. I he description t>f n Permanent l)ock we)uld be changed to any dock which is nt>t a seasonal dock. Thihault .suhniitted a suggested definition of "mechanized means" in the seasonal dock definition. Babcock questioned whether the definition should be in the Ordinance or definition section of the Code. He observed sup|»ort on the Board to allow se/isuna I docks to remain in after the biiating season. He, however, would discourage that. He suggest­ ed a provision that it is illegal to leave a dock in which is not in gootl condition. Enforcement of an Ortlinnnce on di»cks should not depend on the season of the year. The condition of the dock shouhl bo a vnliil concern. If the proposed ordinance is adopted the LMCD loses all control on private dock construction. Carlstni thought the ilefinition of "mechanized means' could be improveil and suggested referrinr it to the I.MCf) attorney. He has a problem with seasonal dock? tig left in. except in wet­ land areas. He noteil the debris leii in the lake after sjiring break-up. He said docks left in can be a hazard to cross-country skit'rs. Carlson suggested making up a list of issues rei.it ine to docks and address alI of them at one time. It is important to have ordinances in place so action can be taken when needed. Gratliwol agreed there could be a studv of all provisions relating to private docks. He suggested a sub-committee on rule changes. Gratbwol observed that Tbibaull and the executive director are experiencing difficulty interpreting the ordinances and. rightly so. are coming i») the He said there could develop staff direction as to how forceful to be suggested there be a review of the Board asking for direction, frustration in not getting in enforcement. Grathwol whole code because when a change is made in one section it can have an impact on other parts of the I'ode. The executive directoi agreed with Grathwt* I’s comments. Ho said there are many viol.it ions of the turient ordinance requiring seasonal docks be removed at the end ot the season. rurrenttv the staff has to ndvise the pi»»f>erty owner, upon com|*laint or formal mat ice. (hit a permanent dc^ck perraif is required if the lloclk ie left in. The one-t iwe lee lor a permanent dc*ck is 1150. It was also noted in the discueeion that even when the dock boards are removed, the posts left in create a hazard. .fohnsictne said he his noi he.iid etioiieh to convince hisiself that the change should l>e oiadc at this time. He tM»ttld like airtre time to c ns icier t Ik implications. NoTIUN: car Ison louved. Johnstone seconded, to table the disius- s I i*n of the t>tclinanc.e ch.invr to further icfrntifv the imp I I cn t t nns of the « it cfi e. The staff is to review t lie discussion gn«| retain to t ho voaniilee with t ecotsMenda t tons . VOTf : Motion carried uciin isMtos Ijr. WATER STRUCTURES COMMITTEE Suplcniln?r 12, 190 2 P 1 A. Draft of Ordinance authorizing executive director to iasue deicing licenses. The committee received two drafts of amend­ ments to the deicing ordinance from LeFevere. Option 1 wouhl Allow the executive director to issue renewal deicina licenses with no violations or alleged vit> lotions the prior season without Board action and for all other applications the executive direc­ tor could issue a prov i s i on a j J_i subject tt) Boaid approval. Option 2 would allow the executive director to issue renewal licenses without action by the Board provided there were no violations or alleged violations during the term of the prior season. In the case of all other applications and in cases in which the Executive Director determines not to issue a license for any reason, the appiication sha I I be releried to the Board ol D i rectors. Babcock reviewed the cv e r letter from I, e F e v e r e . d ii t e d 9/2/92. in which LeFevere discourages option I. which allows granting a provisional license subject t»» later action by the Board. (irathwol said the second option submitted by i.efevere makes I he mo St I a c l i r a 1 *. «mi s e . The e x ■ u l i v d i i <•» I«»f would have I •» set up a ptucediire lor new applications and Ihut would give the committee and Hoard time to iliscuss them. MOTION: Oralhwol moved. Johnstone seconded, to recommend Amend­ ment Option 2 to the ordinance relating to deicing equipment on l.iike Minnetonka, ns submitted by Attorney LeFevere. VOTE: Motion coiried unanimously. Ordinance regulating the use of styrofoam in5. C!ity of <)rf>iio dock construction. The committee received a copy of the City of r^rono t>rdinance prohibiting the use of non-ciicased styrofoam as a dock flotalloni device. Babcock said he would like to see the LMCD adopt .somethingi along the same lines. He noted Murr thought the 12\JI\94 compli­ ance date was too soon. The committee, in previous d i s cus.s i ons . recommended a five yciir period within which to come into compli­ ance (Marino oporotors also requested Orono to consider t ivf years. ) . Carlson naked about the useful life of styrofonis. Babcock said there are some styrofoam docks whicli have iKen in use for ft long period of time. Rascop suggested the use of styrofoam i» dock consliuctlon could be limited to five year**. Cftrlson said two years for iemoial would he Ishort a period ••( i imv .is Iheie could be a financial liaMlship on the maiin.i opernt«>f. Babcock suggested 1 years and a I tow n petition for s loneer lime. Carlson did not agree with a petition proceas. He said there should he a d«te certain ftod no repairs to h*- i«||i*wrd to the docks. Johnsttoie suggesietl adopting the ordinance ne refer­ ence. Ihe executive director observed that wost of the sterofoam docks are In the Cite of Orono. The LMCO should want to present anv new styrofo.xm dock I net a I I at ions . He noted stvrof..am is also used In swiaeslns docks smi buoys. WATKR STRUCTURHS COMMITIHi:September 12, l*J*J2 MOT I ON Rascop moveil. Carlson socondctl. to refer the City of Orono Ordinance prohibiting the use dock flotation device to the Hoard ber. fhe Orotio Orditiance will be Orilinance. A letter is to be sent them of the committee nclioti. VOTK: Motion carried unanimously. of non-encased styrofoam as a for a public hearing in Octo- used as a basis for any LM(!I.) to the City of oron<» advising 6. Multiple Dock License Violations. Thibault reported on the multiple dock license violations discovered during the aiuiual boat storage inventory and/or annual multiple dock inspections. She reported letters have been sent to violators of the following: A. Homeowner As soc i .11 i on s that put in seasonal docks dif­ ferent than their site plons. They were advised they have to to the site plan or submit a new site plan, boats not stored in a designated boat c o n f o r m B. insm. c. boa t s. U. lion. E. storaie unit A Vachl Club with an unlicensed plat form for two smalt One condominium with a major change in dock configura- nne Homeowner As soc i a t i of) with a resident who insists on ski is in the dock use area, over the licensedjet were 12 to pu11ing his two number of USU. Thibault reported that out of licensees there 13 who wore written letters for license violations. During the boat count she found the followine; A. When inspecting residential tiocks with suspected boat storage violaliona. it is difficult to determine tl»e boat license numbers because they are obscured by canopies and boat covers. She concentrated on contacting those with fiver or eiore boats first. ^ ^ . B. Slie observed some sma I I i>ut lots wfieie there nave t»cen three or foui bouts stored since before tlie current ordinances were adopted, allowing them to be g r and f a t he retl. r. Mt»st of the complaints received at the office ur® neighbors comploininf about encroachment into ihwir lM»ck D. There were two specific cases of adjacent residential sites combining dock use areas for a multiple dock with 5 or •o*’* boats. When advised that « multiple dock liten«»e Is required for a flock with 5 or m** *e noats, tlie resi’Ivnts comp I s i ned. coMients we I e that by combining docks thev h’nl less ii^iicl Ison suggested there could be s differeni muUiiile d.»ck license classification for residents who have coaibined l>ock Use Areas. isscop noted ndveftisemen I • In the gaper selling out lots for dockage. . .i • a. -ieeulaltons on boat stoiase si oet lots and resMtrniisI aHes •ere eiptamed he SircMMen end Thibault. f rom l>sr Their un I tie i wati:r stkucturhs committi-e September 12, 1992 Babcock sugjzcsted a collejte student or intern couUI be employed during t lie summer to do some of the inventorying of boat storage at private docks. Ihibault said that would be helpful. Grathwol observed that the members are getting information that they have never had before. The Board has to decide what enforcement ste|)s have to be taken. He thought educating the public may l>e enough enforcement. Carlson said at some point in time there will have to he enforcement. The executive director distributed a copy of a newspaper article he submitted for release in which he detailed the provi­ sions the LMCD requires for keeping boats at docks and moorings. Ho said in most cases people have been cooperative when advised of a violation. 7. Adjournment Chair Babcock ileclared the meeting adjourned at 9:JO AM FOR THE COMMITTEE Lugene Strommeri, Executive Director Douglas Babcock. Chair }. 1. Oil ~”^clrrce Ir-ZL;__o^o.'vc sfp 17 iose MIHIIEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD OF MAHAGSRS AGEHDA Thursday, September 17, 1992 St. Louis Park City Hall City Council Chambers 7.30 p.m. 1. fall to order; note attendance a. Approval of Agenda minutes of the ReauIar_Heetina.Ql August 20. 1992. I, |Ptibllg Hearing on 1993 [ Levies 5. iPublic Hearing on PrQPdsed BuU AnttDdamU Hearing q€ Permits AddIiCitiOna A. Applicant: Location: Purpose: _ _ _ _ _HQ. ilrUi Hark Saliternan 4560 Lindwood Lane Deephaven, MH 55331 Shoreline*^improvement involving Installation of approsimately 127 lineal feet of fip fAp ihorellne erosion protection. B. • c. D. E. r. Pertnlt AppUCff^^o" Wo. 92-159; Applicant: Dale and Kelly Renner 5114 Arden Avenue Edina, MN 55424 Location: City of Edina, T28, R24, Section 18, Nl/2, Sl/4 Purpose: Floodplain alteration involving addition of family room and other living space. Permit Application Ho. 92-161: Applicant: City of Minnetonka 14600 Minnetonka Blvd. Minnetonka, MN 55345 City of Minnetonka, T117N, R22»., Sec. 4, SEl/4 Stormwater Management Plan for residential sanitary sewer and water main installation for Linner Woods. Location: Purpose: Permit Application Wo. 91-lQ: Applicant: Humboldt Circle Corporation 5128 Irving Ave. S. Minneapolis, MN 55419 City of Minneapolis, Sec. 21AB Stormwater management plan for a multi-family residential subdivision at S5th Street and Humboldt Avenue. Location: Purpose: Permit Application Wo. 92-92: Applicant; City of Deephaven 10225 Cottagewood Road Escelsior, MN 55331 Location; City of Deephaven, Sec. 24AA, St. Louis Bay* Lake Minnetonka Stormwater management plan and shoreline improvement for reconstruction of the City's main beach area. Purpose: AQl«_21z:21: Applicant: Location: IPurpose: Temple of Israel 2424 Emerson Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55408 City of Orono, Sec. 5CC Installation of 120 lineal feet of rip rap along a drainage swale and alteration of th« floodplain to provide drainage for the swale. •2- G * I. Permit Auplicatlon WQi_92~I67' Applicant: Steven Molencamp 6430 Co. Rd. 26 Minnetrista, MN 55364 Location: City of Minnetrista, T117, and 3, 1/4 Sec. NW and NE Stormwater management plan for a commercial site involving the construction of an outdoor riding arena. R24, Sections 2 Purpose: Permit Application No. 92-16Zi Applicant: Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District 12615 County Road 9 Plymouth. MN 55441 City of Orono, T117. R2. Sec. 9 Stormwater management plan involving the development of a parking lot, new well, irrigation system, brick pathway, gravel driveway, and stormwater holding pond Location: Purpose: Applicant: Location: Purpose: Ho. 92-163: Jerry Martinson/Pamela Haack 2970/2980 Casco Point Road Orono, MN 55391 City of Orono, T117, R23, Section 20 Shoreline improvement involving sandblanket placement among 25 feet of Shoreline on Lake Minnetonka Permit Application Wo. 92-168: Applicant: Cemstone Products Company 2025 Centre Pointe Blvd. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 City of St. Bonifacius, T117, Section 32, 1/4 Sec.MW M ^ ^ i ^Stormwater management plan for an Inaustrial site. Location: IPurpose: Permit AppllcatijQn fto. 92~17fiS Applicant: Mt. Olivet Lutheran Church 5001 Knox Avenue 8. Minneapolis, MN 55419 « ,, City of Minneapolis, T117N, R24H, Section 16. 1/4 Sec. SH , «Stormwater management/£loodplaln alteration involving construction of 0.1 acre driveway. Location: Purpose: -a- 10. bk;’ U. 12. 13. L.Permit ADPlication Wo. 92-169t Applicant: The Minikahda Club 305 West Excelsior Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55416 City of Minneapolis, T28, R24, Section 5, 1/4 S0C• sw Bank improvement involving widening of existing drainage ditch. Location: Purpose: M.Permit Application Bo. 92-161* Applicant: Richard Westin 940 Smithtown Terrace Victoria, MN 55331 City of Victoria Floodplain alteration involving removal and replacement of existing sod and topsoil. Location: Purpose: N.Permit Application No. 92-165: Applicant: Steve and Jane Von Bevern 3850 Lone Cedar Circle Chaska, MN 55318 , ,, Location: City of Chanhassen, T116, R23, Section 8, 1/4 Sec. SW 1 SI >reline improvement involving installation ol approximately 136 lineal feet rip rap si ireline erosion protection and a B> Sblanket. purpose: 7. Enecutive Committee RePQI-t. 8. pgHnoialnta and Violations Conaaittce RcpQlfc 9. Finance Committee Reoart A. Report. B. Proposed Budget for 1993. Plana and Proarams Committee lePQit. Rules and Policies Committee RcpqLL« 14. AttorneyReoort 19. unfinished Buiittcaa U- wgw[ pus inass 17. MiflilXOMIli* UTHAJCfa) 4- p Lli MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 20, 1992 MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTK'^PT BOARD OF MANAGERS The regular moating of the Board of Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Waterah.d District was called to order by President Spensley at 7:00 p.m. o.i Thursday, August 20, 1992 at the Wayzata City Hell, Wayzata, Minnesota. Managers present: Erickson. Spensley, LaBounty, Lindley, Love, and! Managers obsent: Thomas Also present were Board Advisors Panzer, Fyverson, Quanbeck anji Smith, Tind Coordinator Klanderman. Auproval^of Agenda It was moved by Manager Love, seconded by Manager LaBounty, that the agenda as distributed be adopted. Upon vote, the motion carried unania»ujly. Approval ofL Minutest The Managexs^ reviewed the ainutes of Che regular meeting of July U, 1992. It was OMved by Manager Lindley, seconded by Manager Maple, that the minutes of the July 16, 1992, meeting to approved. Upon vote, the minutea were unanimously approved. Project Ho. 92-1 Public Kearlno ~ bv the City of Mavzata tot Preaident Spensley reviewed the duties of tt ' Board of Managers to determine the teasibillty, benefits, «nd damages of! atrtrmwater Improvement projects that are proposed by petition. The managers must determine that the project is beneficial and any property owner bo taxed for their fair share of the cost and that properties damaged are fairly compensated. The Board has available the petition by the City of Wayzata, the Engineer’s report, and the advice of the Department of Natural Resources and other agencies that reviewed the Engineer’s report. President Spcnsley introduced the District Engineers who gave an overview of the project as presented in the Engineer’s report. The Engineers recommended alternative one to the Board of Managers because it meets the objectives of the Watershed District, the City of Plymouth and Wayzata. President Spensley opened the Public Hearing for testimony: Mayor Bob Gisvold of Wayzata stated that the project offers an excellent opportunity to solve some of the water quantity and quality problems as they relate to Lake Minnetonka. Mr. Gisvold acknowledged that he is aware that there are some concerns in the Gleason Lake neighborhood area and that he hoped these concerns can be addressed. Mr. Gisvold i.aid that he was excited about the project and hoped the Watershed District will approve it. Fred Moore, Director of Public Works for the City of Plymouth, stated ♦•hat the project is in accordance with Plymouth’s adopted stormwater drainage plan which previously established the high water elevations for Gleason Lake. One of the major concerns Moore has noted from speaking to property owners in Plymouth is what permanent affects the project might have on the shoreline around Gleason Lake if the outlet structure is modified and the flows are changed. Another concern is if the outlet is constructed and is more restrictive, what effect will it have at the higher elevations if the water is allowed to rise with major storm events. Moore requested that the Board of Managers address these concerns when considering the project Ceil Strauss, the area hydrologist from the Department of Natural Resources, stated that the Department sent a comment letter to the Board in response to the initial Engineer’s report submitted in April. The conment letter is now part of the .*evised plan. The Department is generally supportive of projects that reduce flood damage potential and improve water quality. The Department has received numerous inquiries from the residents in the Gleason Lake aroa. One major concern ie the affect that a change in the outlet structure would aave on flooding potential. In evaluating the District's permit application, the Departsnnt irould need verification from the District that there were no structures in place before floodplain toning requirements were established, would require that easements be obtained foe -J- .. .• i propocties that are affected by changes in flood elevations, and hydrologic calculations be submitted for different storm events. Rick Wetzel, spokesman for the Gleason Lake Improvement Wetzel feels one of the primary objectives of the project should bo to return lake levels to what residents are used to experiencing after a significant rain fall event, ^he Board of the Gleason Lake Improvement Association recommends adoption oc the proposed alternative with some additions that aie described in tho proposed findings. The outstanding benefit for residents on Gleason Lake is the potential for water quality improvements. The Association feels that the Phase II portion of the project would benefit them but would like to see the study expanded to include the balance of the Gleason Creek watershed. President Spensley stated that another benefit of the pond at the inlet to Gleason Lake is that it allows for some additional storage. The feasibility study is the formal first step in authoriiliw tho project. If the Managers the second phase couli not be authorized until the feasibility study was done because other properties are directly affected. Part of the focus of the watershed's overall comprehensive plan is to improve water quality and increase stormwater storage in the upper watershed. The Gleason Creek project focuses on that Intention. Art Peabody, 1297 Black Oaks Court, stated the creek adjacent to the townhouses on the north shore of the lake Clows through very rapidly, contributing a significant amount of sedi^nt. Mr. Peabody would lik.3 to see tho water kept at bay to decrease sediment loading. He is concerned about the timing of Phase li which will not be considered until after Phase I is Implemented. Art Xozorotski, 940 Garland Lane North, stated any temporary increases in water level will not affect the residents nearly as much on the north end of the lake as those residents who live to the south. Mr. Kozerotskl is concerned that passage under the bridge that is located between the north and south sides of tne lake will bo difficult If the water reaches an approximate elevation of 944.6. Lee Wallace, 41S Comstock Lane, generally discussed some of Che findings as they will beneficially affect the residents oC Gleaaon Lake. w.illace strongly supports the project. -3- Gary Blecm, 200 Black Oaks Lane/ stated there are a number of homes behind Wayzata High School that may be affected if the water level increases in an adjacent lagoon. Mr. Bleem believes a portion of Black Oaks Lane will be under water which may affect the road bed and the sanitary sewer. He also feels that proper notification should be given to the homeowners in the area so they can acquire the necessary easements. Mr. Quanbeck stated that he has spoken with the City of Minnetonka about Mr. Bleem’s area, and the City does not feel the project will create any problems for the sanitary sewer. Floyd Vincent, 250 Glenbrook Road, stated that in the last several years ho has been experiencing flooding problems within his home. Mr. Vincent is very supportive of the project because it involves tne creation of additional stormwater holding ponds which will alleviate his flooding problem. Mike Minzberg, 16645 14th Avenue North, stated that a pond created by the development of his subdivision is filled with sediments due to water backing up from Gleason Lake. Mr. Minzberg is concerned about the water quality of his pond and the increased water levels created by additional storage within Gleason Lake. He stated that water reaches an elevation of 944.0 which is three feet below the elevation of the slab of hia house. Mr. Minzberg requested the Engineers to consider this area when studying the overall affects of the project. Mr. Parks stated that Mr. Minzberg*s basement was surveyed and was found to be at elevation 949.5, which is the minimum basement elevation established by the city. The appicirimate elevation of their easement is at a 947.0. Mr. Minzberg's residence will be considered during the Phase II portion of the project. A question was raised by Mr. Wetzel as to whether Phase II will be expanded to include the balance of the upper watershCKS. President Spensley answered by stating that the Boa*^4 will be considering other projects in the upper watershed, bnt these prcjects will not be Included in the Gleason Creek Improvement project. There being no further testinwny. President Spensley ordered the public hearing ended and the record closed. It was sK>ved by Manager Lindley and seconded by Manager Maple that the Managers adopt the proposed findings, conclusions, and order to establish the project as distributed, with one amendment on page four, paragraph 14 to include the statement following the word *and‘ in the sixth line ’along with additional storage provided in Gleason Lake would offset any decrease in the flood storage capacity.’ Upon a roll-call vote, the Managers voted as follows: Spensley Love Maple Lindley Erickson LaLounty Thomas AXfi X X X X X X My.Absent President Spensley declared the findings, conclusions, and order adopted. President Spensley requested the consideration of the budget and preliminary levy for the project. It was moved by Manager Love, seconded by Manager Lindley, that the Board adopt a resolution setting the budget and preliminary levy for the Gleason Creek Improvement Project, No. 92-1. Upon roll call vote, the motion carried unanimously as follows; Spensley Love Maple Lindley Erickson LaBounty Thomas Ayfi X X X X X X Nav It was moved by Manager Lindley, seconded by Manager Erickson that the Board adopt a resolution authorising the acquisition of interest in private properties needed for construction of the project. Upon roll call vote, the motion carried unanimously ai follows: Spensley Love Maple Lindley Erickson LaBounty Thor^a X X X X X X Absent -5- d 1993 Budget Report It was moved by Manager Lindley and seconded by Manager Love thot the agenda be suspended and that the remainder of the proposed 1593 budget scheduled as part of the Finance Committee Report be heard. Upon vote, the motion carried unanimously. Manager Lindley reported that the Finance Committee had prepared a proposed 1993 budget for each of the District's Funds including the Coordinator expenditures for 1993. Manager Lindley reviewed the budget report which listed the allocation of funds and the total proposed levies for each fund budget, a copy of which is attached to these minutes. On behalf of the Finance Committee, Manager Lindley moved that the 1993 preliminary budget as prepared by Mr. Panzer and presented to the Managers be approved, the proposed levies be certified to the Hennepin and Carver County Auditors, and that staff be directed to publish a notice of a public hearing on September 17, 1992 for the purpose of conaidering this preliminary budget and the proposed levies. The motion was seconded by Manager LaBounty. Upon a roll call vote, the motion carried unanimously as follows: Spensley Love Maple Liridley Erickson Labounty Thomas X X X X X X Approval of Permit Applications It was moved by Manager Lindley, seconded by Manager Love, that the following permit applications be approved and the pernlts be issued, based upon the recommendation of staff that the applications were complete and found to be in compliance with the District's rules: 9Q~9B. Hennepin Countv: 9Q~103. Jack Menkvold: 9Q-I67, Jeff Essen; 91-121. City of Chanhassen: 9^-100. Christ 92*^5Q?^MaiQld^QkinQwt^92-154^^City*Qf^MinnetQnka^^a M. E. Denennv. Upon vote, the notion carried unanianusly. ^ * • Tahlinq of Permit AoDlications It was moved by Manager Love^ seconded by Manager Lindley, that the following application be tabled, based upon staff recommendation that all necessary documents had not been provided as necessary for staff review: 92-98. Wright Hennepin CQ-QB Klectric. Upon vote, the motion carried unanimously. Hearing of Permit Applications 92-49. Lowell Zitzloff — Shoreline improvement invQlYinfl inatallation of aporosimatelv 2QQ lineal feet qC TIP ggP gnQgeiine erosion protection and the construction of a concrete City of Minnetrista^ Mr. Cliff Keep was present in support of the permit application. The Engineer reported that this project involving placement of rip rap shoreline erosion protection materials was recommended for approval and noted one item set forth in the Engineer’s report which remained to be received. It was moved by Manager Lindley and seconded by Manager Maple that the application be approved and the permit issued upon receipt of the item noted in Engineer’s report. Upon vote, the motion carried. 92-61. City of Minnetonka — Stormwater management Plan ffti installation of aDproximatelv 1.600 lineal feet .Qf atOfni-afiMei-and reconstruction of 1.6QQ lineal feet of_fQgdwflYj—CitY Qt MillDfttOflKflU. Mr. Mike Johnson was present on behalf of the City of Minnetonka. Mr. Peter Carlson was present as an Interested citizen. It was moved by Manager Lindley and seconded by Manager L ^Bounty :o approve the permit based upon recommendation of the Engineer, with Issuance upon receipt by the Engineer of the items set forth in the Engineer’s report. Upon vote, the motion carriea. 92-128. Peter Rqndf?? — Shoreline Improvement involving ifiMtallation of 95 lineal feet Of fiP IffP fOI aHQIniinC BlOaiflUl nroteotion Vt V of Ed^ Mr. Randall was present in support of the application. The Engineer reviewed the project, noting that item one of tne peeing eshibitt had been aubmltted by Mr. Randall though not yet reviewed by staff. The Engineer stated that he did not ezpect any problems with the design of the erosion protection which involves of a geogrld system. It was laoved by Manager Love and seconded by Manager Lindley. that the application be approved and the issued, the review and approval by Enqireera of the item submitted by the applicant. Upon vote, the motion carried. 92-140. Richard Haaen -- Shoreline improvement involving Removal of existing rip ran, installation of a oeotextile fabric and reinatallation ot existing rip rap^ City of Excelsior. Hr. Dale Rossing and Mr. Eric Dunway were present in support of the application. It was moved by Manager Love, seconded by Manager Lindley that the permit be approved and issued upon receipt of those items set forth in the Engineer's report. Upon vote, the motion carried. 92-152. Paul Bilka — Shoreline improvement involving installation of approximately 115 lineal feet of rip rao shoreline erosion protection. City of Tonka Bay. Mr. Stephen Spartz was present in support of the application. It was moved by Manager Love and seconded by Manager Lindley, that the application be approved, based upon staff's recommendation, with the permit to be issued upon receipt by staff of those items set forth in staff's report, in a form and substance acceptable to staff. Upon vote, the motion carried unanimously. 92-153. Lorence and Jeanne Voehl — Shoreline improvement involvina installation of approximatelv 150 lineal feet of rip rao shoreline erosion protection. City of Tonka Bar. Mr. Stephen Spartz was present in support of the application. It was moved by Manager Love and seconded by Manager Lindley, that the application be approved when the application form was signed by the applicant. Upon vote, the motion carried unanimously. 92-156. Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board -- Floodplain alteration involvinQ the construction Of irrioation/stormwater/ golf water hazard ponds, earth bunkers, and an irrigation pumo Hinncftpolii.* Mr. Dennis Ryan was p*'esent on behalf of ^he Minneapolis Pack and Recreation Board. Mr. Panzer stated that the water level in the ponds and Lake Hiawatha should remain the same when the pumps are running within the ponds. if the pumps are not functioning, then the flood storage capacity within the ponds is lost. President Spensley asked whether the Minneapolis Park Board had any area available for mitigating additional flood starage. Mr. Ryan responded by stating that the terrain was very flat. Presidfjnt Spensley stated that he was concerned by a potential loss of flood storage downstream, and SK>re consideration should be given to storage on the site. Manager Lindley foresees a net gain of storaQS if tho 4#500 cubic yards of excavated material were to remain above the floodplain elevation of 818.0. Manager LaBounty stated that he was concerned that the success of the project was contingent upon the pumps functioning properly. Manager Lindley discouraged the use of variances that would be necessary if increased flooding were to occur. It was moved by Manag't Lindley# seconded by Manager LaBourty# to approve the application based on revised flood storage calculations based on an elevation of 810.3# rather than 808.0 as proposed by tb applicant# with the permit to be issued upon receipt of those iceros as set forth in Engineer’s report in a form and substance acceptable to staff. Upon vote# the motion carried unanimously. 92-157. MnDQT -- Installation of gabion and riP rap shorelips ftroaion protection on the Wavzata Bav side of the TiHi. .101 brid<IgA City of Minnetonka. Ms. Susan Rani was present on behalf of the Minnesota Department of Transportation. The Engineer reviewed the project# noting that MnDOT would need to mitigate flood storage loss at a nearby public site within the floodplain of Lake Minnetonka. President Spensley noted that 50 cubic yards of fill in the floodplain is considered by the District to be significant. Ms. Rani suggested that it would in that case be necessary to go back to re-design the project to eliminate any fill in the floodplain. Manager LaBounty noted that having walked the site, there is some erosion# and again noted that the current situation may present some safety concerns. Ms. Rani stated that MnDOT has evaluated the bridge and downgiaded it# and expect to have repair work done in the near future. Managers Spensley and Love indicated that public safety is a serious concern, but that from tho District’s perspective, filling In the floodplain also was an issue of serious concern. On the other hand, if the fill is part of a shoreline lE^rovement for replacing lost shoreline due to erosion, the project would be consistent with the requiresMints of District rules. The Managers discussed the possibility of allowing the project to go forwai^ given the emergency public safety concerns, and requiring MnDOT to provide compensatory storage at some other location if not available at this site. Mr. Psnxei stated that ^ significant eroaion had occurred at the site, ind that District practice had been to allow compensation for up to five years of shoreline erosion that can be documented. Mr. Panser also noted that the DNR had approved this project based upon the replacement of eroded shoreline and the safety concern. Following discussion, it was moved by Manager LaBounty, seconded by Manager Maple to approve the application and issue the permit upon receipt by the engineer of documentation of shoreline erosion that had occurred within the past five years. Upon vote, the motion carried unanimously. Approval of Additional Permit Applications It was moved by Manager Love, seconded by Manager Lindley, to approve without discussion the following permit applications, based upon staff recommendation, as detailed in Engineer's report: 92-52. City of Qrono: 92-143 Wade Holasek: 92-144. Rav D. Johnson; 92-146, Edward H. Ring and 92-151. Elian Dehaven. Upon vote, the motion carried. Hearing of Additional Permit Applications 92-147, Deb and Bruce Kenadv — Shoreline/bank improvement involving the recons*vaction of 50 feet of existing boulder rio rap along Cooks Bav. Lake Minnetonka. Based upon request of the applicant, it was moved by Manager Erickson, seconded by Manager LaBounty, to remove the application from the tabic for a five minute discussion. Upon vote the motion carried by a vote of 4 to 2, with Manager Lindley and President Spensley voting against the motion. Ms. Deb Kenady was present in support of the application. Mr. Panzer stated that the application was incomplete due to the '.'ontractor providing insufficient detoil to Illustrate the project. Ms. Kenady stated that she is anxious to comply with Engineer's request fer additional exhibits because her neighbor is currently landscaping their property, and she is concerned that it will be difficult to access her property once the landscaping is in place. Mr. Panzer offered to advise Ms. Kenady*s contractor on the necessary exhibit detail required by District Rules. Manager Love noted that this case was a good example of why shoreline improvement contractors should be licensed by the District. Following discussion, it was moved by Manager Love, secondedi by Erickson, to approve the application and issue the permit, based upon staff review and approval of all submitted exhibits. Upon vote, the motion carried by a vote of 5 to 1, with Manager Lindley voting against the motion. -10- mm Adath Yeshurun Cemetery — Floodplain alteration involving installation of grave sites^ City of Edina» The Engineer reviewed the project, noting approval of the application pending those items listed in Engineer’s report. Manager LaBounty requested that a fourth item be aaded that would require recording of the flood plain elevation on the title for the grave sites located below the 100-year floodplain and indicating that the sites are located below the 100-ye^i floodplain elevation set at 858.5. It was moved by Manager LaBounty, seconded by Manager Love, that the application be approved and a permit Issued, based upon the receipt of the three items noted in Engineer’s report, plus item four requested by Manager LaBounty. Upon vote, the motion carried. «>2-98. Wright Hennepin To-op Electric — Installation of at underground: electrical distribution line acrosa fl >*etland.and Crosby Creek. City of Medina... Manager Lindley stated his concern that erosion control was not in order at the site. The Board is waiting reply from the applicant regarding this t.iatter. It was moved by Manager Lindley, seconded by Manager LaBounty, to table the application and refer it to the Violations Cumroittce for review. Upon vote, the motion carried. 72-141. Richard T. Goodgrtnont -- Wetland alteration involving wetland bv constructing an earthen dike across 1 drainage ditch. City of Minnctriatft^ It was moved by Manager Love, seconded by Manager Lindley, that the application be approved and a permit issued upon receipt of the items noted in the Engineer’s report. Upon vote, the motion carried. Qf St- Louis Park — Stream Crossing inYQlvinqi construrtign * oddestrIan bridge across MinDghihft CgeeH..Qn...L^fl north aide of W. 37th Street. CitY Of St. Loull PillU The Engineer reviewed the project, noting that pending iteias havs been received. It was moved by Manager Love, seconded by Manager Lindley, thad the application be approved peeing Engineer’s review of the three items received by Engineers. Upon vote, the motion csrried. -11- Execatlve Committee Report President Spenslcy reported that the joint powers agreement with the City cf Minnetonka concerning office and personnel services had been executed# and that it would be appropriate for the Managers to consider the proposed change of District meetings to the Minnetonka City Hall. Following discussion# it was moved by Manager Love# seconded by Manager Lindley# that the staff be directed to publish a Notice of Public Hearing for September 17# 1992# at which the Board will consider changes in its rules to designate Minnetonka City Hall as its principal place of business# and that regular meecings of the Board of Managers be held on the fourth Thursday ot each month at Minnetonka City Hall# rather than meeting the third Thursday of each month alternating between Wayzata and St. Louis Park City Halls. Upon vote# the motion carried unanimously. Coordinator’s Report Ms. Klanderman reported on activities in establishing the office at the City of Minnetonka. Phono lines for the District Office are being installed, and Ms. Klanderman intends to hire a secretary in the near future. She also indicated that in the event that the Managers hold their roeetinr's at Minnetonka City Hall# it would be appropriate to purchase name blocks to indicate the names of individual Manager; and staff. It was moved by Manager Love# seconded by Manag *r LaEounty to authorize the purchaie of these name blocks. Upon vote# the motion carried! unanimously. Complaints and Violations Committee Report Manager Love repotted on the activities of the Compleints and Violations Committee# with a number of recoramendations concerning the status of violations matters. It was .moved by Manager Love# seconded by Manager Lindley# that the projects for Permits No. 92-06# 92-07# 92-08# and 92-09 be found in compliance and that the violation file be closed upon receipt of the payment of Rule J fees Upon voti # the mocion carried. It was moved by Manager Love# seconded by Manager LaBounty# that the projects for Permit Applications No. 89-06# 89*208# and 92-158 be approved aa ''ought into compliance upon receipt of the payment of Rjle J fee, ind *:hat the violation file then be closed. Upon vote the motion carried unanimously. -12- <sma9 It was moved by Manager Love, seconded by Manager Llndlcy that the project for Permit Application No. 90-151 be approved as brought under compliance. Upon vote, the nwtion carried. Manager Love noted that four of the six pending Rule J payments have been received concerning the Libbs Lake matter, with payments from property owners Hanlon and Colson still pending. Manager Love reported on a meeting with staff from the DNR concerning prospective nusasures of deregulation of DNR activities and delegation to other local goverruaental units. Specifically, the DNR is considering coordinating greater utilisation of conservation officers with other local goverrrmental units such as watershed districts for enforcement sctlvlty. The Managers asked that the Complaints and Violations Consnlttee continue to discuss the subject with the DNR. Manager Love also noted the need for continuing creative end cost effective enforcement Rffissures for dealing with shoreline improvements and ssndblankets, and the ConsBltte© will continue to review these issues. Manager Love noted that there is a potential violations matter concerning the City of Mound and its coMson shoreline area. Following discussion. It was anved by Manager Love, seconded by Manager LsBounty that the C<Miplaints and Violations CosBsittee along with staff continue to evaluate the Issues of responsibility for violations at this coaseons area, and seek to solve problems of mutual concern with the City o£ Mound. Upon vote* the motion carried. Mr. Panser noted that there may be some DSR funding avallob?2 for d*f »epslr and similar projects. The Managers directed Mr. Psnter and Ms. Klanderman to Investigate and pursue any possible applications for this funding. Mr. Paniet also noted that the OMR fgny sn extra 'ake level recording device which could possibly be SMde svsilsble to the District. rt - gttatlBumd Manager Lindley distributed the Treasurer's Report for August 10* 1992. Following discussion, it was moved by Manager Lindler* seconded by Managei Irickson to approve the Report and authorise the payment of all bills. Upon vote, the motion carried unanimously. •IS* r.IaD5. jJiuLitaa xiamai. Comm it t o»? H^port President Spensley noted plans for a meeting to address the comments received tor the District’s 509 Plan. The District should also roconvono a technical advisory committee, and at some point in the near future have o working session of the Board to address the 509 Plan. The staff and Plans and Programs Committae were authorized to pursue this process and return to the Board with ongoing status reports. Mr. Smith noted that in addition to the rule changes concerning the District's principal place of busineas and meeting place, a previoua amendment to Rule B had been authorized and would also be appropriate to notice for a public hearing on September 17th. The Managers directed that the change to Rule D also be noticed along with the changes in the other District rules. Mr. Panzer distributed the Lake Level, Flow and Precipitation Report, noting that level of Lake Minnetonka was measured on August 19, 1992 at 929.03, Mr. Panzer also distributed a proposal for conducting the District's hydrological annitoring program. The Managers noted that the Menck proposal involved an annual estimated cost of $21,500, assuming assistance from the District Coordinator end ■ample and date collection. Pollowlng discuseion, it was aoved by Manager Love, seconded by Ma>\a,a*’ Lindley to accept the Me nek proposal, and to direct Ms. Flai.^KraMn to send a letter to J.M. Montgomery to inform them of tBia iecision and thank tnem for their proposal ae well. Upon the motion carried unanlauuslf. Mr. Panser also requested authorisation of the Managers to assume responsibility for the Long Lake Clean Mater Partnership Project, Including responding to commants received to date. Pol lowing discussion, it was asived by Manager Love, seconded by Nsnager LaBounty. to direct Nr. /anser to proceed accordingly. Upon vote, the motioa carried unanimously. the 4($jdMXaMAl There being eo further busineaa before the board of Nsnagers* ksetlng was adjournaHl at 12:10 s.m. Respectively aufeeiitted. Johe ■. Themsa -14 N THE LAKE \ riT? irATION OF TIIF I.AKTJMINNF.TONKA LAKESflORE OUATRs \^M)^IAT1^N IS.SUE 12 SEFI tMBER IW2 MEMBERS ONLY EDITION PROPERTY TAX INTERVIEW with Dan Distal, Assessor by lorn l\tkotn)sky This could happen to ytni Rn entlv. all lake^horc land value% m Deephaven autumaiicallv increased I miervicN^cd Dan Distal, Assessor tor Deephasrn and asked stime probing questions about this situation Here arc his responses. Pokono>ky: lUd Ihe Hennepin ( ounty Aiusior's nffict require you to rai\r the IW2 land valiu of every (keephaven lakeshore property by H%? OM.il: Yes The building portion ot the market value sused the same I he result was an aveiage increase ot Deephaven land and building values by 4 9% for lakeshore properts only Pokoiiitvks: Why did the Hennepin County A^1rt%or'^ offtee %rlnin*t\ inereuie Heephaven iukrehorr pn*pef1y2 Disial: The ittue tor Deephaven is the ciMtipariutn of the assesuvr ’i value with that of the Mle pnoe tor homes sold between Octub'r I. IVQQ Ihroi^h September H), I^MI I here were b sales dunftg this prnod used by Hennepin County as a test The asiesicd value must be at least of the property sale price These us sales slunroil that the median Deephaven values were about T9 9% of the property sale pnee As the assessor lor Deephaven. It IS my responsibility id conform to die 90% Me mandoed Mv imttal 1992 vakam far Dr^dtave*' likesliorr propeniaa were at dm same value av die prior year Tlie sis aln Ml dwirt of the idaaiardi by appeoatmately 10%. prompting an ladiuiMiodi Tins malMd m a 4 9% msai valuaiMin BWI's and Water Safety... by Lee Ann Sanna Bill Chandler of the Hennepin County Water Patrol recently conveyed the following facts; • BWT’s for I9*>2: So far 25 out of the 47 are people w ho are lake area residents. • It Is grtlina hrfitr bccauie more people are complving wuh the bo.iting and drinking laws. There are nu>re vober skippers because people convcuMisly ch«n>se designated drivers ITte push acro>s the slate is to combine dnving, boating and flying vuiiaiions into one law. Currently. It goes tnly onto vtwr driving revord if you had i pruK alcohol related incident. Since the revent sobriety checkpoint, mmy people are ram designating boat drivers. The LMCD and the DNR have giMten the word out that they are patrollifif U»r drinking boaters. Thankfully the Power Stpiadron and ('oust (iuard Ausiliarv teach safety classes ihM rTNvre people are takii^ whKh is good for all of us. (HMI't continued on pair fTtttri (mnrnmmed mm pmge From the Helm hy Ihm (iennanson, f^nsidmi, l.\tl.O \ You are sccinj: the 1 Ml.OA bcMunmj: nu'rc prolcssumal. Our membership is lum over KKH)! The b*)\ below shows a profile of our membership. Tutai Laktshore Homtt JU27 Astn Homti 335 Condo Units B41 Assn Otficas 56 Lakethor* Business 30 Total Lake shore 4'M 7 Off Lakit Members Total Members Members Percent 874 22 0 77 2? 6 15 J?55 1004 23 0 4 1 10.7 38 4 20 3 19 Future newsletters will also rctlcct ehanjre '■'e newsletter is our vehicle u» keep us all informed. We are lo*»king for vour eomincnts. What do you think? Me.isr fill out the emlosed Mirse) curd Ufid mail it hack to IIS (jmsfa;;e {Midi. (HWI'i ntniinueJ fn>m pagr /> Alcohol has hern a majt»r contrihutin| factor m biMl fatalities Thcxigh this scawm is cooler and baiimg activits is quitter ac ross the state, there have been mc^ tMU boating accidents this year than tn 1^1 (Her half (N)%» have been ticohtd reintd. Eighty percent of btiating awidents on Mi ineumka arc aktihui reUttd ^^e continue to grow to represent and inform you. Milfoil, Zebra Mussels. pro|K*riy taxes, and overcrowding continue to need improvements. If you can otier help in these areas, plea.se contact us. I’eople are needed to speak out at meetings regarding these subjects. The scKial side of the LML(7A can always use your help. Gatherings by bay are needed to bring us all Uigether. !J you feel the urye to yet involved, contact us! Again, we look to become a more professional organization. Any involvement or comments you otter help us get there! The water patnW is made up of 5 paid fkJblic servants and volunteers (they're allow^ to have Only two volunteers live on the lake. This group IS resfMwisible mM t»nly for Lake MmnetonlHk but all of the lakes m Hennepin Cosmry. Violations,,, Toopusg the lack of bt# facketa ibfe lockett wocAd <mv« *ohowad by hre »*t>ngu»ah#r. wo«kabNi pcooe* tafety xM omerst K Tips for a safe eMpenence.,, ^ u7»ecr rowr boer out o*Vow * fvive a for mo»« fsev if you ar« tl mo o»mo* poT'oi V<Hi mo 'oporrod miaaMf to IHO OrOfO* 0Ot*Ot oihon tHoy «*«»• |UOt cvuioeif «• f OM boor fAo#ri om ioa# io* trfio 4VV p»Oy»nf «Tg DREAMING ON... by ieff Ann Sunna VVh<»n j ter^ old hov hy the namp of Gene Scaf^lof) laK.e Minr^etonka for the first time, he thougfd “’Oh boy. this »s it’" Gene was orphaned and placed with a dentist and his wife tor a weekend visit The couple lived on Lake Minnetonka in a big house on a hill overlooking the lake They treated Gene to a boat ride in tf^eir 1 [*40 model Chris Craft and started a boy to dream From tfiat day on. Gene would ride the street car into Eicelsior when he had the money and time, and go fishing- always dreaming of living on Lake Minnetonka Never losing sigf>t or fiis dream. Gene worked hard, and with the help of his wife, Caihy tfiat dream became a reality at ?815 Casco Point on the upper lak-» ten years ago living on the lake is peaceful for the Scanlons and tf^ey believe the lake is there to en|Ov whether playing in It on It. or jiroK}n6 i| They both feel fortunate to have tfie beauty iruf wealth of the lak^ m thetr own backyard A major stPt t ) preserving this reM ’ief .lHnt bo<ty of watvT iu tfbuvv Cleaning his lakeshore m summer, Gene gathers cups, glass, nails shingles and butldinn materials that are continuously dumped «n the ”wati»* fill " the spring thaw brings cans bags and various debris from the winter ice colonies Gene Scanlon is mn only conscienttous about the lake he lives on but tares about his feWow man He heroica^y demonstr «ted this a few years ago as he ar^ J •% . *■' • #t^ ' Ur . 0 s. t » » ♦ hp - C ,H « ' i 3r ! ? Gan« Scanlon his fishi «g budt\ put out a huus« fira with a cardan lH>sa Tha fact t!iat Gana can t tat a good causa go una dad was again provan whan ha hatoad h*s granddaughtar. Anna coMact 100 pounds of pop tops *of tha R >natd McDonald Housa Stand up and ba counted Gana Scanlon, for ctftnQ about your naighbivi your anvironmant and voo» planat' Commons Comparison h% Ihtft (ti nnnnsnn A. I "^F<V3Us Ci' ^*mft wa tha W i.ini 4 »<uaiMn Pt«turad j|it>va 1% an r *jiwpti tif huw difftnrm tha »u«iifm*nt pto^rry .an ba f>ta lab phohi Ih t , ra%il> acccssthla and •ii*at*JMa \ > Tha pwtutt at '>fh< it alt*> . pau^art> i« 4J and Alma * Raaaufani tfi Coai » Sif pcoparty a n»H aatiU acwesuhia ua tr 1 rrsrfrfa b ortys rr* wtmkt um ^tfrf a» <|m I wm Ik4h pfu|>yMiat art fuvafnrd itflikr bla VAiW Ihv-y ay ' >hKh Public Access h\ lU v Hhimberfi Public access to Lake Minnetonka -myth Of reality? Depending on who you are or who you talk to. It could be either one. The Standards and Data Gathering Subcommittee of the Lake Minnetonka Public Access Task Force charged with reaching the mandated goal of 700 long term car-trailer parking spaces in the vicinity of present and future access sites around the lake ha> found the potential for over 845 of them without having to buy any land or build any new parking lots. To make these spaces re!>able and secure is the rtext step. To do this we wilt need the commitment ano cooperation of not only the DNR. LMCD. Hennepin County and lakeside cities but also public access users and lakeshore residents Th.s survey conducted bv LMCD and ONR staffs earlier this year represents preliminary data. Lots within an access site, are not considered reliable car trailer spaces at this time From this data the goal of 700 reliable car trailer spaces wi« be develooed as identified m the Managerrtent Pl^ tor Lake Mir>netonka The subcommittee will study this information and then present it to the entire task force some time m September The task force wtN make these recommendations to the LMCD, DNR, Mervtepin County end lakesrtJe cities The mem problem of the task force part o pents has beert one of iietmitK n When the task force first met m March, everyone e'jreH that the first step to be taken ares for LMCD, DNR end Mennepm Parks to detir>e a rekeWe car trailer perking space These egerKies heve h#en e part of the •ubcommmees end have given deimitions or stertdprds for pubkc access parnmg A set of standards fias been drawn up and will be made a part of the Lake Manan^ff'C'^* P'®” revisior. has been to inciear.e the distance of all spaces from a public access site from 1500 feet to 2000. Off-access site locations should be provided with a long term agreement of 3 5 years on file with th? LMCD. Boat mooring must be available at the ramp site for boats equal to 10% of the parking spaces. Of the total non designated (non-signcd) on-street fiarking spaces, only 75% are considered to be reliable in order to account for non- ccess related parking (desigrtated/signed 100%!. Another issue has been one of equality Mot all lakeside cities have public access. The task forca will state that the current allocation and distribution of parking spaces is r>ot equitable A recominendatioo wik be made that aW cities have to make a concerted effort to provide fheir share of lake access parking spaces. Myth Public access should be available to any user during peak use periods. When this hn« of reasoning is used, access to any pubic access »s perceived as rwt e*istmg. False perception# shoufd not be viewed as reality. A count of potential parking spacas was done after rne definition was given of a rek^ie car trailer parking space T his agreement rvseds to be honored bv an participants of the task force if it is good to proceed and te effective *n making pubke acceea fair and eguitahte ___ We shouHf be ae*mg our pove/rung #pene<«a on r#crs- reaAfy. or pokrrcabr--myffk C«y D‘. cks »10 4%* «3f%> tl Wl *•« tkimk * %if fftr w»#ri /mkte Northern Tier Notes hy Jane Best Heftnier The time has come when we arc all prcparinti to wind down for the summer. Docks will be brought in. bi'ats taken t)ut and stored tor the winter and genet ’ winter precautions will be taken. The g<H»d new s is that membership in the Northern Tier reached 18.8^ by August 1. ldQ2. Although slowly. It shows the dedication and enthusiasm of w*me of our fiay Reps and Block Captains. To you untiring souls. 1 give my many thanks. You are the true Spirit of L.MLOA. Your belief i** the need to preserve our lake for future generations is at the heart of 1 Ml.OA. You sec the need to get your hands dirts to go dixir-fo dixu and inform your neighbors and you arc doing your part and more. Not only do I thank you, my children and grandchildren thank vihi lor not "passing the buck" and hoping someone else will do the job. Speaking of future generations, we are the future generation of some of those settling here in the 1800 ’$. I would like to include m Sonhem Tu r Sates some history of the bays/areas that the Northern Tier includes (Crvstal. Forest I..»ke. Hamson. Jennings. Maxwell. Nimh Arm. Stubbs ariu West Arm). Please feel free to send me any information you have about these hist»)ncally rich areas (your parents ’. grand^Mrents ’ memories, etc.) Briefly. I gathered «»me inft*rmatu»n regarding Orono/Crystal B.iy from a 1^15 Tour Guide. Orono was known as a summer colony only; where MmneajHilitans came by the Great Northern for summer adventures at the cottages. George Brackett, originally from Orono. Maine, named Orono after his old home because it reminded him of it so much--thc jHrace. tranquillity and nature on the lake. Mr. Brackett was also comm.inder of the .Minnetonka Yacht Club at its inception around this time Did voii know that the first vacht race was won«• ^ by a b<»at named Tom Viumh, lormeriv owned by a m.in of the same name.’ As we know, yacht racing has grown to be a sery popular water sport and includes many diffcrtrnt fleets of boats. The proximity of Orono and C'rystal Bay (settled in about 186.^1 made traseling to them by the Great Northern the easiest which, in i91^. was a very busy route. Did you know that on February 24, 1915, the ('rvstal Bav Post Office was broken into and S3 was 0 ^ Stolen.’ Ail at a time when travel by an F.xpress Boat fare was 10 cents! Ihe .Northern Tier would like to plan a get- togfther between September '0 November 15. I need organi/ers Ui help me. .Anyone tnlcrwlcd In the ptannirig plea.se call me al 472-3*77, tASAP. Let 's t clehraie t>ur histon toiiether! Our Opinion Maxwell Bay Access hf Be* Blomhrrx I cww imc puWK Kcext i%u#rk as a rct*drm of Maxwttt Bay Th« DNR't plan to tM Bin bas a puBllt a^cta* angered me Oir bay m over ume guiilatinii for boat capocdy ai n the raitfv lake Alter rMdtfif Brftoet of fhr Lde AtnMr$t>nia TttU r. June idtV Mernifwiatm CamtH’i fo«4 om Lair Utnnepomka. A|vil IMS hthiu WiMr* 4 rtf rMi TWtii CMri Hrrrofntiiium irrtt taSe$ 4l and l#aaoge*tie*i/ W<*nrr««u.u, Ocaoddr 19*1. I «aMad to know wfitch apMcy. dte IfftsN "Tiirmfwi Cmmn. LMCD of which were ctuMithed to protect cue lake waa achaaVy dotfif M' Oaettwm were ratted oi all of dki aforementioned r^»rts regardtng like ute and how i envtronmeniaily allias utif lake These ^uetuiM have nut been antweied id m> mnstactKiQ At a membee of die *ask force I am nut comfonaMe ewforMng the foil of TUu car ttatlet pmkmg Mtacet The equjiNh of Hk3a half peivme/haif pnhhi. »t not. m upifa n. edmialMe »f prtvme mchidat nniMpli dock acceaa I dim dm nvx l MCD mcvio % Am ptiardy pouter »e and praaarse tfM Umned mtree h ihmild no iMOie be aaoionrrl Milfoil Update hv l\ttiicia McCullough, U'fivca/fl Bay From the DNR... In a discussion with Ti>in Sak. Milfoil Cin^rclinaior for the Department of Natural Kesouacs, the following update was obtained regarding the milfoil problem in general. • There have been fewer re^K>fts of new infestations of lakes and waterways this year than last; in 1991, there were reports of 14-15 new lakes infested as well as several ptxils on nver backwaters; this year there have b^n only 5 new lakes reporting infestation as well as the St. ('roix River The weather could be impacting this. With the cooler summer, the growth is slower and mav not bt discovered until next year. Divunguishing milf(M! from other aquatic growth is not possible until it reaches the surface. • Three lakes had programs for treatm^^nt this past year that were cix>pcrative efforts among the takeshoiv c ;n'*rs, the conservation districts, the County and tl«; State. Three lakes that were treated were Crooked Lake in Anoka, and Little Green and Lllen Lakes in Chisago ('ounty. After 3 months. Crooked Lake still appears to be free from milfoil, but a 12-18 month period will be necessary before reaching conclusions. • The legislature has provided luntling for research for milfoil eradkatMso for the past several years, even though the Stale has been in a defk ii budget ntuation. The Department of N.nural Resources has made advMKei m funding fi>r milfoil ircMment leseardi. • The mifor ttttif rritiiH lo fifid itir moai effective tfcaimant for die dottars expended to ireai mtifml CtwiMcai irraimcids hast been used lo dale m as macRaaacal rrnvuvai through harsetung ItBtogxal ifiWMi. eg. through hmgut or msuct patfiogeiis. m being tailed by the DNK and tn a foioi program amh the University of Mimsesuu There baa not been enich pnvait msai^rmeai IT. ttut type of treatment bcxaMie the rket It net f|jL\ A* Cipitee eeeifired eie poft ^ From the LMCD... Gene Strommen. Lxccutivc Director of the Lake .Minnetonka Conservation Distnet, provided the following update on the status of the proposed treatment program for St. Alban ’s D.iy. • The program is progressing. • The LMCD has completed its aquatic plant inventory, funded by the LMCD. to develop the needed baselmc data This study cost $7,500. Two major steps need to occur before the treatment program becomes a reality: • ('oncerns have been raised about the impact of the proposed treatment program on the fish population, particularly the young of that year, or new hatch. Discussions arc currently under way with the DNK Fisheries division and the Minnesota Sp«>rtfishtng Cungrtu to work together to raise fTH>ncy privately lo d** a fish inventory ilus fall, as well as a '''*w hatch inventory next Spring, and the following year, to ttetermine if there is any adverse impact The anticipated cost of this inventory is SI0.000 per year for two years The threat, it appears, is not the chemical ’s impact cm the ycHing hatch, tnit the removal of cover, e g., milfoil and vHher aquatic vcgeution. makint tbc young hatch more vulnerable to the prediKir fulL • The funding needs to be secured. The cotf of the treaiment program will be spproximalely $30,000. Hennepin Conservation Ditfnct has ptedged emo* half of the costs thren^h nudehmg funds, m appnmmateiy $15,000 The LMCD will to takeahorc owners m AJban'i Bay. BKiiiding both mannas and pnvaie homes, lo lane die balance of approtimaieiy $15,000 For many owners, the raquemed conmbution will aoi he iMi^ Afferent hwa dm money dmi duty hove tlMCD 3 (PSR Milfoil Update continued from po^e 6) [HTceived as large enough. Ihcrc is a company that IS attempting to develop a high concentration pellet of the fungus treatment that can be selectively applied. • Successful programs to control milfoil will most likely need to be a partnership of a vanety of agencies. Treatment is still a very expensive proposition. • Lake Minnetonka remains a greater challenge because of its size. Hven with a treatment program in selected bays, there is no way to hall the spread back into those bays trom the main lake area. LMIOA BOARD MEETINGS The LMLOA meet* the firs* Mcnday of e»th roonlh Meeting* are held »t "^ 0 p m.. anJ i>p<t» alt members. Call the LMLOA Hotlu e at 472 9876 for tnerting locatton*________ (LMCn Milfoil Update continued from pof^e 6) Because the use of SONAR, which is a very low^ concentration chemical (10 parts chemical to I billion parts water), there will be no adverse impact on using the lake, e.g., children swimming, pets in the watn. In general. Strommen feels that the milfoil growth has sUibilized on the lake. Three aerial flights have been made this year to obseive the lake. Aesthetically, the lake looks belter this year because major areas of infestation are 1*2 feet under the surface. The LMCD is also interested in homeowners or other lakcshorc owners informing the LMCD if they notice that there is significant growth of milfoil in areas in which they had not observed it in the past. The LMCD does not have staff to do this type of observation . but is interested in monitonng milfoil infesution. According to Strommen. additional "how*ios." e.g., rccjucsting that boaters back weeds otf their props before entering the bay. etc arc dittails that w.l! be w'uked out tftcr the abo. two steps arc completed. Ihcic is really no way .hat tf.c bay can be isolated entirely. Lake Monitoring--A Must for Lake Minnetonka! hv Kathf p\aa d Jennifer fkuzenroth Do you havt sn intertst m knowing ttni w4ter qustity of Lske Mtnnetonks} You wdl be happy to Know that tb# LMLOA « hoUxog to form a •Lak*»watch’ pfogram Ttut procoss wM b« started with the Secch. (Sak' i) Osk. ktvertted by an itakan narrMtd Sacchr, thia aimpfe an-nco *a used to maaaura the clanty of :be water Whan uaad ovw a panod of lima. »l can hetp track long tarm changas at wai at aaaaonaf fiuctuat*ons tn tha watar ouaaty. Tha whrta d.sk la towerad nno tha »aka to a poati whara It drtappaart from viaw. than raappaart. (TiMtufamant ra than noted on tb« caiibratad rape mckidad with tha Anyone can uaa a Sacchi Ofk Ca*» fha LMtOA Hoti*na <472 »8;«) today to let w* know that you are mterastad «n monnortng your bay. It wOkM taka oiUy about 20 rranutes of your tana onca a week durng open w»icr aaaaon Tha LMCD and tha Tonka B#y Manna are fiattfng th«a protect, whila the Fraahwaiar Fosawk«t:on « cfo*rtg tha tachmeaf portion of logging and coonPnatmg the data The LMtOA « responaiblo for raachiTMl you and your noighbors who wM mnkm ttaa prof^am a reafuy. Baaaa be part of Ihp pionaars who workod together to cfaan up aur beautiful. fragOa. ripturP laapueoo Wa baga' w rh a ©nphour tooaf gatharaig at Lord Fletcher s on Saturday October tO at 10 00 a m At tt« maatatg. you wP gat the dataits rha apupmpnt to bagm maratenng a^ the apnng I (Taxes continued from page I) PokcHiosky: Apparently all the homes sold, hut one, were worth over $500,000. I understand tluU about hidf the homes on Deephaven lakeshore are worth less than $500,000. It appears to me that hundreds of homeowners suffered a property valuation increase, in a depressed real estate marketplace, based on a pitifully smtdl sampling of Deephaven lakeshore home sides. Furthermore, it appears that no home worth less than $545,000 was considered in the sampling process. Why? The sampling is totally dependent on pio{)crfies which have sold. I agree that the sample size may not give an adequate picture of the real estate market. However, the sales do retlect that the values for assessment were low. As the assessor, my responsibility is to have all properties assessed close to their market value, whether these properties ate of the SI.000,000 category or $300,000 price range. Deephaven it a difficult assessment area. It is so varied and diverse, with a wide range of residential values. PoknnosKy: This practice should concern every ij..\r Minnetonka lakeshore owner W'hiu do vou see in your crystal ball for Lake Minnettmka property owners in the next two years 5 PisfaJ: This practice has been in effect for many years My prediction is that u will be more intense. The State legislature is putting pressure on the Department of Revenue to further break down segments of an overall assessment The direction clearly aims at higher value properties, hut is intended to measure the quality of an assessment and try to assure equalization of all in-operties. I see a grratei use of statistical analysis (sales v$. assessor's value) as a mnsure for the distribution of the ua burden and a greater role by the stale in the adjustment pt-ocess if standards ate not met. Many aspects of my job as the assessor will be statistically mandated. The City of Deephaven. and other like cities subject to a small sample size, should be very concerned. The l.MLOA should follow this legislation directive and keep informed on this aspect as well as other property ta.s legislation as it develops. Pokoiiosky: Do you see the Hennepin County Assessor's office continuing to take an active roll in arbitrarily increasing property values in your area of Jurisdiction? Distal: The county will continue to lake an active toll in the overall equalization of property values insuring that minimum standards are met in all jurisdictions. Hennepin County only steps in if 40 .isscssment has not met the minimum standards. Pokoiiosky: Finidly, how do you see this apparently arbitrary and capricious increase this year impacting on your decisions when evaluating lakeshore property udues in the future? Distal: 1 have already staled that the sample size may not be adequate. .Sales alone do not fully measure all aspects of the real estate market but laws, rules and standards arc to be met. In the future. I do no* intend to lest these standards or measures. It is rwii my place. I will continue to base valuations on market activity using common sense, counseling with others in the real estate business, analyzing sales, finding out why the pnee was paid, finding out why th.it property hasn't sold, etc. But the properties that do sell arc the measure of mv evaluation. If properties in a ;»nicular neighborhood are selling higher than the assessor's value, that neighborhood can expect their evaluation to go up! ANNUAL IVIINNESOTA LAKES CONFERENCE All Are Welcome.* fAnenJam r in 1991 wu.\ ostr 4001 October 2 3. Aif|«ert HSion l«kf MtocietiQn* and lake manaqament WViaf you can #o tor yOur lake OkfR plant manaoarrMtnt proprpffi • Woto* duality prodtam* WmirylVqps Cfotw JUtem $90 • la«« i««tpiat*ort Baaic la«a bMlopy • Eatft>Ct • I sac momtomtn * Taa taauai * Maifo m • I k* laiaj Commons??h\ lhan Hutius'LteAnn Sanna Dean Hanus owns a nice piece »>f lakohore on Phdps ay in Mouml Actu.illy. he doesn’t »)\vn the lakesh(>re. ; abuts a narrow strip «»f "commons property" positioned ctween his lot and the lake. In light of the recent newspaper amcles regarding commons. I asked Dean some que.s- tions about the diffi- c u I t I e s a s s <> c i a t e d With living next to c o m m o n s propeny Hanu« on hi« Commons pfoporty Q. Whatodrict nvuidfou offer to people pnsiiuty livia^ coitiftions or in the process of huxint* eofontofts lake shore? A. Well, today I w«»ultjn’i recommend it. at least n»ic until the program can be revamped arwi updated The commons program as it now stands is heavily skewed against the abutting «mners Wee are required to maintain thi.% suppitsed "public !anvl" n »*ur own expense The general public has no responsibility for it whatsoever The Cits olsit places severe restrictuins on how we can use it Moreover, the vitv council has adopted a Win-Laise iMerpretatHin of the local ordinarKCs con«.erning repatn or impruvemems to the many structures existing on these larsds m«*sf of these improvements have existed h«f gmrraiiom As a rcMiit »»f not being aWe to maintain the structures, they Me tailing into dorepaii and turnit^ mn* eye-ences Tht* backward thinking «i4 onls hum the osetaii value **f •»ui ptoperttes. it wreaies a dai^ertme situjiiiui l»»f anv«»n« wh*i muvi uiiiure thnee situciures. whether they are decks. hoathiwMeh stairwairs The prtKess makes absofulely m* seme' Pievervtng some lakeshi»re hn the hewefii aad mn of the general piddK n m admirable foal However, ht achieve that foil, you mwsi ht dMe lo mauiiatfi ttkee* Umti widhiwi plA^'hf rtke fWaim.tal hwrvlmi on a few vainct ntJsvtJush. II e . the abwnmg tamhwewersi M .ml hae I* etther me (I. Art' you thinking of selling? \, No I he com n»»ns item, as bail a.s it is. can be fixed. It’s a difficult tavK. considering the con.stam roadhiock.s and hassles the city places on abutting commons owner's, but it’s an opponunity tor me to make a difference. Q. Where do you want to go from here? A. We definitely need to see some big changes in the commtins program, .\lany iif us have offered suggestums already but they haven’t been warmly received One of the originators of the commons program said recently that the program was never intended to remain etched-in-.stone It would need to he periodically updated, adtusted and revised to tit the needs of the public at large, as well as the abutting owners NV hat other ^ity requires a limned and select group of homeowners t** maimain public parkland «Hit of their own p**ckets ‘’ The city should be maintaining tliese pafvcls and paving for it through their taxing 3uth4irity. n<»f forcing the abutting owners to t*HH the bill themselves I really do think that new representation would make a world of difference in .Mound The current leadership has forced a situatum on the residents that cinild easily have been avoided The city is currently facing one civU law.vuit regarding their mismanagement of the comnujiB, with others sure to toilt>w This is costing big bucks k angers me. and it should upset every Ntound tax paver because we are tiseing the bill. Dtun xtiJl ft,Is p,rjufute ut hr living on fyfy Minnetonka and it tZVi u> makr hu pin r of it htok as pmni as possthie. Ht\ pnihlrmy nith City Natl cominitt, hut he is Hilline to crvrpiomur He surt. “There are all kinds of tdtrrnaiivrs- Long-term uaw agreements shnmU he esphered, as \%Hi us smamm of inaccessihie and part eh Get .umr of u im the tOM rnfts ttftmr if hrkmgs.. t\rnmnr i^tntld htriefit Ath/ice from s lamioeenet Abuttii*^ the Conimorts. . o tm» •• Uwyvvf • ham* mm CORUeufee mt ernummem ww yrm 6#* X f9^ |ya mmi • •muimwmrn W / rmm Ml f m ^ ffk# Ml Cl ir# fo w0m < Mi t eXl f^ik # igMMM m Mm ^9 ^ T 0 % w n JJ Who is Running in the State & County Primary Elections on Tuesday, September IS Affecting Lake Minnetonka? Cll'is WC^Uptp CAWIMPATI WgSIDfNT pp cmts iNClUDtP CAWD«0<ir> WfSIDCNT Of MCNNCPIN PARKS COMMISSIONER Of frtct 1 Shvl«y Boninn (I) L C. Harfi* lind« Jim Whft« (U D#«phav#n !■€•»« lor Or««r»wood Mtka iMch Mmn«frttta MoufHf. Orono ihor«woocl. Spring Tonlia t«y, Way/ara WoodiAod O^tfKl 4 Jim Carav MiTMiatonaa Vmca ^av ^nta iiH W#ir Ml mmiiFiii counTv cosiMissioNiPi Mauia Ptatn Mapla Grova Mapta Qfova OlOfH) MifinatoniLa idma Diatrtct • Oaaphawan \N llmnatoniia PiiUfcf T Daa^havw I Cacalaior Qraanaaapd MUu( Saadi MmaUiaia Graanfiatd Jo#in Kaafa HI D»cfc Kramar Sobart Samuaiaan Chna T^nham Laura Lind Am»a Lirvigran Buaan Pagnac Judy Sagoabasaa Silt Sc hr asbaf Jamaa ScN^i Cmily Siaplaa M»nnatonta E<1«na Edir^ Minnafonaa Mtnnafonlia Mi^^ta Grova ifooklyn Cantar Mapia 0#eva Long Laaa Mapla Qrova Pty mouth Plymouth S?^a«oad, Sprmgi Para tai^ Pay. v.ayiaia STATI LiGISlATUPS Janata 34 Jaiaia Johoafon (Dl Gan Olaon (IP I) Kouta 34A M^M» PHa^ Mmnatfffta Minr^atrista Mound Spring Park Hw j Crono N Kim iaanbarg (0l John Jaurach (0l Stava Smith HR II Mound Mound ttnsf 43 Carola HarMwaM (0l Maria Vaaikou (iRl Todd VandaHan HR} Norhart Garr>aa lOl Darratt MclCignay HRi Id Oirvar HRl Plymouth Plymouth Ptyirouth Idan Praaia loan Praati BatiJ tIA Mtka taach Orono S Shorawood W Tonlii Say lacaiSior Oaaphayan Graanyyood Shora¥y<HMf f! Woodtand Sanata 49 CmH Appaiquiat lOl Tom Workman (iA} loan Praaia Charm aaaan Bav Daut^ (03 Jarry Rhtcler^ocitarCm 0 Cfiig (IRI Cah Hir^n m MifTha RaSorfion OK) Judy rraus (O R Waytata Hnuaa 4SA M«nnatonaa dl • ind. RaiWiPS Rar% Ahrama SA-S Oaaa Slamtrrpjilt (Ql itanSa> Wayiaca HENNEPIN COUNTV SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT MARINE CRIME WATCH i«11 tlwft IS on th« tiM H«i* tie s <m»m* Mtv co«w»iw»n ««nM TPS to s'otocf foot wci«ci«ft md •- tl one If J You# t»«st 0oi«r>«o sg^tnit it t« rsmo«t i wr^«n yow m^k cr»ir / rut • eootf trsAsr Men nk^ «n vowi i>«^ / a you »M‘H tiPut OutSid*. Out tM ton^uO doso to § tuRgiNt «r fiJioO Oft^oCI tlM» wnth yoof KOrnC* LocKir** *t to • ♦ *00 OOiOCt n«l» / Socuro rout ^POOtO motor «rtP* • Ovt^iTv tOCAiftf bbt H f99 tttw fdm rnamtnn at a dock / Clou Sfyd toes pottMios emm gout ong cg»woo»tmor>tt RMO / H»wO tomoon# CMCS ♦ J' lUMiO vO«^ gogil OS t^O </ 0o« lo MMOw rowi goc* dotoi'oi-T '*uu« '^OigHgO^S You UP* ✓ ✓ ^OM O* sglogUCS •HIR «Ou «ou 'oup rowr JUMms QgW t NrU aQv S QWgQMg ’* or fut Px ggMi Osemm m* t trtr t« *FN0« OP* vOw* k'ON 0P*g t* ’«»0Y« M*O0 AO«g O »0t O* «pP*01 fPu Ng*0 OP* SO^ OOgt OS dmpgrs tPioN op OttomotOO 'MN U« OgP* t 'wo r«u 0 rO^ g«p* t CAU fliw ^ « 1992 CONTRIBUTORS Htim - ($100 or more) Robert Trenary Qrovelan'1 HO A?sn Sam/Joycj Ma/ficld Navigator*($25 or moral 4.0f«n,M«ami Adamt aiN Bohohoff Jim Ce^gili Myjoyce De/^ D)€ti/Gtf^g9f Crrvva Croedy H#my Croedv iob/Suten 0o«rr Tom/Jvidy fit JehfWJean Tfrry'Kiftvf rijfdofd Jffn Cat^y Gtmy Bichiifd H«r>Mn ftldn ■fien TrK I4M i.9mm aed#ft Cercde a«gef H4»e4 « >hfiCri#fyl O^Sr^i#hf^Aiy %mAi a«dA«#a WiAiam Smith N4Miy S«nMtf Aim t«e€) Wem## BiSdft Osma >9Na«tf« BUSIMf SS MfLMfifRS isa2a Ckevt iey BNra #r«yi9i« tl7SS »Sgh^9y §• BlymMtS isoo e 4ja St !•«< i Ski S«#ed isi I iBia iiiiiwmniie PMflMd PMipwa too tar tf !• « Jenrmigs Bay Upper Wes! Way/ata Bay Crystal Bay Simthtewfi Bay lnchafif#a Caast Bay Btowf«« Bay Btoarr»y Bay ^iMi Bay Ck]«oa Bay W«irf Arm Crystal Bay icho Bay ^nasf Bay SayflHaara Bay Catsor^t Bay SmiTh Bay Caaat i Carmam Bay LatayaTta Bay GiSaam Bay Upaar Wasl Uppas W aaf yiraai Aim CrySUl Bay MaiafapI Bay tSasta^a Bay SS^Mll 471 Mm 471 -Mm 474 Bf 17 471 mm 47B 1211 474 MS4 j Lake Minnetonka Lakestiore OMiien A^kMKhilioii OS THE lAKE P.O. Box SH F«cvKM>r. MN 55331-0596 Do N*a Forvk«fJ Address Correction Requested Rcrufii Pu^Uye Gu^aoteed .T -•vr’, \ / L •ULIC MTI aosTAca aaio iKCtisior. im aannit no. lOt SSI 2 I 1092 Honbor at«tu« /Non City Council Orono PO iox 66 Cryetel lay, MN 55323 MARK YUUR CALENDARS for NOVEMBER 16 at 6:30 p.ni. LMLOA Annual Membership Meeting Lafavette Club Board Frrsrnfatitm and Social f0r man tnfo call 472-9876 1tf3 LMIOA ttalf OFOCEIIi Don Gcmw^too. PrtsiOom fen« * jy Katny PyMt. Vico Pmiaora Fmn Lam j MarciO MtcnaSii. Trwfurif’Uoofar Lafca SI 0«v ileosMvg. Socralary OMECtOfiS Maawad Bay L«Af«i S«via. NawNcnir ■ten Lant Nad Catiagna. Enwaowtwm CryiSH ■!¥ fyfelaa Canrwtt, MantOartfuf St Atera Bay eraq noryae), nanraa St AtenaBay Jmnmlm Ooti*fwotr>, locral Caaco TteN Gaiiw Go<4. Lawai Loaa Cara«a Munaon. UMmt LaM u»aa Jwrm Na«t Naowaa, Nonf*a*n T«ar CQMtflrfUi coowiNaTOM Paraat Lana aiHR Fraaan. kaeai 8«mri Bif Tam Pahawaiey. Tax C^ioe^Br* iiaexaM vtraai. T*«»a«maBav he (’.ilizcns lenjriie \s an irwk-|H luieni non parlbon |*ul)lic .ilfairs a-seardi (Tg;uuz;UkHi. It» a metni|K)litan ()i);a ^ nizalion fociiHcl m Mmiu'soia Inmics A s ;ui ojwi niMulHtship (>f^;;mi/;Uion it is dbtin Rublieil Iw l!*.* iim)hvniiiit of mv Iuh U'it aMiiniii- tew in tk.*\Tlnpii^,poli(7 recnmtmnitliliotisHit CaUmts Unigiw's mission is to imuiHiU’ U k* piiWic intcresi In Minnesotan) ‘nvolvingeitizt ns in kk*niil)ing iuk I franiin^; critical |Hil>lic dances, forging rcamminKblioiis anti ail\uc:iting tkir adr^Kn mwi* t- 1 tmti « Fr o L 4^n & 9. f?’^ - Jti' fit? f I Cn 5 Q> CITIZENS a i.EAOUE A N N I V t M S A It V C r I f n M A T I ( ) N Citizens Shaping. Minnesota ’s St'jdnrJwrSO, I9!fi 7:U)p m liithimm Bfndiefhond Aaitohuoi Fuffth t^Hinur South Mnrnri|Hii^ MN SSiOJ , CtTtXCNS Cl LKAOUB'’ r A N I V I M ‘ > A M V < ! I I H M A T J ( ) N i Otizetis Shaping Minnesota’s? ^ SIB /ifefijB • VITIK tBjgri tpaiiritoi Unilnrwwn %fSlwlibiwiLSaA MnBpii^ IPi SMB! Cite Shaping Minnesota’s AgendaD«t«»Wednesilay, Scptemlicr 30,1992PliceILLUjieran llrothcrhorxl Auditoriinii 6'25 Fourth Awnue South Minne;^x)lis, MN 5S402 Co«t $ 15 in aitvaiid'; $20 al lllfl door Tim® 5:00 * 7:00 p.m. SrOO Rcfa-sliiucuLs/snacks 5:;M) Ijeadership Ra:o);uiliou 6:00 40 yvoR'; Past mul Fulufi’ 6:30 IVTiturrd r 1f’i’ogramJWhat a Yaar!IV'’ck7 Mnikcrson looks back at an unforgettable year, rec(>}',nizes lA‘aj;ue leadership and intnxlua'S new Kxecutive Diixi'tor l.vle 'XravA 40th Annhrarsary Tourwith tour mihk ’Paul (iilje Looking Borward...to our History John Hraiidl, IW2-93 lA*ay;iie President.outlines die Iramie's new Nlraley;ic direeUoii Koynoto AOOroso (jtx)ry’e laitiiuer. Dean, lliuiiline Dniwrsitv Liw Sc1hx )1 aitd fonm*r 4 Mayor (»f St. Paul.will l;dk .about tile Hileof citi/eiiship in a diany;iny» ami OMuplex gowniiiH'nti f Rogistration FormN:une(s)AddressIdinne3Yos, I'll (wf'll) bi* llicn*O No. yjrry I (we) can t make ih but would like lo make a contribution t(j tiu* Unigur in adi-hra* tionof its loth st ar.JIRoHiod of RaymontCost S1 5 in mlvance; $20 al tla.* door R.S\ P by .M<mda\. September 28 Oldieck Ijickml Make clieck payable to llie CiliiCeiB Leaj^ (^Pleav'bill iin’ O (Jiarge my M;ts^r(!.TrdAtea or rMscTwer ('.anli Canl# __ Kxpiraiioii dale Mail' laglitftion fopm las cm/ixsii:A<;i k 7C8S 3ftlSuilB500' Minneapnfisk MN 55415 T4 fogiatot hy piNiilo BfMUU: Phu!K(6I2) l»079l rVX(6l2)3r 5919 itw>. TO;Mayor and City Council FROM: DATE: Ron Moorse, City Administrator September 25# 1992 SUBJECT: Fall Newsletter Article? I have attached the articles for the fall newsletter, which will be mailed to residents the second week in October. If you have any questions or comments concerning the articles, please let me know. Thanks for your nelp. FALL CLEAN UP CX!TOBBR 17, 1992 8:00 A.M. > 4:30 P.M. The Fall Clean-up Day is an opportunity for Orono residents to dispose of unwanted items that cannot be recycled and are difficult to dispose of through residential refuse haulers. The clean-up event is held in the City Public Works yard area behind the long, gold equipment shed at Brown Road South and Spates Avenue in Crystal Bay, next to the Administration Building. The followj year. items will MOT be accepted at our fall clean up this Recyclable items that are picked up at curbside Garbage Trees Brush Leaves/Grass Chemicals, chemical containers, petroleum products Construction materials (Construction materials have been added to the list of unacceptable items due to the tremendous volume and the cost of disposal.) Construction materials consist of, but are not limited to, concrete, lumber, doors, wood moldings, boards, railroad ties, landscape timbers, sheetrock, shingles, roofing materials, etc. A fee will be charged for disposal of the following items: Tires - 82.00 and up Appliances - 88.00 each TelevtsloQS - 16.00 each If the above fee amounts change prior to the clean up day and after thie printing the amount in effect on clean up day will be collected. • LEAVES AMO GRA80 CAM BE OlS#OfEO OT lATUSDAYl OTKF0 THAM THE FALL CLEAM-OP DAY tHlOUGM OCtOiES 11. PARKED CARS DURING SNOW REMOVAL Typically the City of Orono begins snow removal when I” of snow accumulates. Vehicles parked alongside of the road in the right- of-way create problems for snow removal. City Ordinance 8.21 prohibits parking any time during snow and ice control. STREET NUMBERS REQUIRED ON HOUSES The Orono Police Department would like to inform the public of the necessity of readable numbers on houses and buildings within the Orono jurisdiction. Several emergencies have arisen and emergency personnel were dispatched to a specific address. They were uneible to locate the address, however, due to a lack of numbers on the residence causing an unnecessary delay. The following is the orono ordinance requiring the numbering of houses and buildings. SEC. 6.40. Sutxl 1. B E. NUMBERING OF HOUSES AND BUILDINGS Duty df Owner or Occupent The owner or occupant o# every occupied property and every house or oth«’ building shall place on such building the proper ttreet number for such building, either by painting or affixing such number so that the number shall be claaiiy visible from the sidewalk or street Where the house is not visibie from the street or private road, or m located more than 300 feet from such street or raad. an additkxial set of numbers shaR be placed on a sign at the driveway apron with numbers visible in both directlona of travel on the street Where more than one house Is served by the same private driveway or unnamed txivate read, additional sets o# numbers shall be placed at every fork or other driveway as necessary to direct traffic to every house including the house farthest from the street Numbers placed on malboxes are irwjfflcient to the provisions of this Subdivision except wh«i maibox stands CXI subject property, not acroee e pubite street and not in a group of malboxes more than one in nun^Mf. The nwlmum sm for number shei be three Inches. Numbers shal be reflectrve or of color contrasting w5h background. In aJdition to complying with the City ordinance, placing readable numbers on your house or building could be a life saver. 91592.3 NOVEMBER 3RD ELECTION The General Election will be Tuesday, November 3, 1992. Included on the ballot will be the local election. The Mayor and two CounciImember positions will be voted upon. Polls will open at 7 a.m. and close at 8 p.m. You may preregister to vote at City Hall until October 13th, after that date you will need to register at your polling location. Registering to vote If you are not registered to vote, you may do so on election! day by filling out a voter registration card and presenting proper identification, showing your current address in the precinct where you live. You may use one of these proofs: * Minnesota driver's license, learner's permit or identification card (or receipt); or * previous registration in the same precinct at another address: or * Notice of Ineffective Registration mailed by your county auditor or city clerk; or • a witness, registered in the saawi precinct, who will vouch for you; oi * student ID card, fee statement or registration card. iiadiui Absent** Voting Absentee ballots are available 30 days prior to the election. If you wish to vote absentee^ you may do so in City Hall during regular business hours* 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.* Monday through Friday. City Hall will also be open for voting on Saturday, October 31st from 1 to 3 p.m, and Monday, November 2nd until 7 p.m. If you wish to vote absentee by mail, you need to request an absentee ballot application. Simply call the City Cleric at 473-7357. You will be mailed an absentee ballot application. Upon its return, a ballot will be sent, to you. Absent** ballots must arrive at City Hall on election day, November 3rd, to be counted. Election dodges If you are interested in being a judge on election day« please call City Hall. A paid training session will be held prior to the election. Election judges are currently paid $5.00 per hour. An individual who is selected to serve an an election judge may, after giving an employwr at least 20 days* written notice, be absent from a place of work foe the purpose of serving as an election judge without penalty. An employer may reduce the salary or vagea of an employee serving as an election judge by the amount paid to the election judgw the appointing authority during the time the employee was absent from the place of employment. ■p: t2 UM X Q, PRECINCT »*4 Schumann Elementary School 765 Old Crystal Bay Rd N PRECINCT »l Orono Council Chamb«r 1275 Brown Rood Soutl City of Orono, Minnesota PRECINCT «2 fr«ahwater Bloloqlcal In*t aSOO Shadywood Road WEST HENNEPIN RECYCUNG COMMISSION • • • •^ • • • GrecnfielcJ-Independenco-Long Loke-Loretto-Maple Piaif>J^ccluu--0«jfKtn .........• - . • . • ftrv CITY n 1620 Maple Av«. Maple Plain, MN '' ■ •* • w •« e' 6 • • • • / ’ # • . \ * a * • •• •.• .p •» . * l’ • /• » • • ^ 6 a ¥ • ► ■ . September 10, 1992 • '• . r ' To: ■ Dorothy Hallin • , From;' ; .Amelia Kroeger • ' Re: . Upcoming orono Newsletter »• -SEP 11 «• •• » • •a . A - >• ei* » , a Please Include the following item in Orono's fall nwsletter if at all Dossible. Orono can be reimbursed a percentage of the cost of reproducing the newsletter if you include rhe 80% Hennepin Cov^ty Board of Commissioners funding sentence. reimbursement would be based on the percentage this item claimed in your newslet^r. I will need three copies of the newsletter. ^ .t a-# # # RECYCLING NEWS a Half of Orono's residents continue to participate in our curbside 18*80% funded by Hennepin County Board of Commissioners. Beginning in January 1993, our curbside program will change in two respects: « «1.• •i -Plastic containers with a 'neck',will continue to be'. *' hatardouB wastes; and • A a.Kagazlnes and catalogues can be included with Items set out lor c\jrbside collection. s:s>rs metal and B-Z Recycling will accept magatlnes, catalo^es and ^ b!i*n;*. a coVut.r i«p«r" iwtch l-c.l p.pa« or call your West Hennepin Recycling Commies ion coordinator at 4 6 0012. Thank you. # ‘ CO I John Cerhardson F StYROPOAM DOCK FLOTATION PROHIBfttfEO After much discussion ^nd upon the recommendat 1 :-n of Orono's Lake Uso Commlttfcit, the City Council adopted an ordinance in July prohibiting the use of non-encased styrofoam as a method of dock flotation. Styrofoam disintegration due to animal or ice action has resulted in significant amounts of styrofoam beads accumulating on the shoreline In some bays, constituting a public nuisance. The Council concluded that there are many options for dock flotation other than unprotected styrofoam billets. The new ordinance includes the following major reguireim«*ntsi 1. ’’Non-encased styrofoam" is defined as a block, sheet, or b«llet of expanded polystyrene beads which is not completely encased in u permanent contsiner or coating that prevents disintegration. 2. As of the date of the ordinance (July 27, 1992), no new docks, swia platforms, buoys, or other floating structures may be constructed using non-encesed styrofoam for flotation, 3. existing docks, swim platforms, buoys, etc. using non-encased styrofoam may continue to be used only until Oecembet 31, 1994. 4. Any repair or replsceaent of existing styrofoam flotation during tn# 1992-1994 -grace period- must use alternative flotation methods. Any guest tons regarding the ban on styrofoam flotAtion should be addressed to the building and Zoning Deoer*ment, 47I-7IS7. \ 0 ' V* CITY PACXLIfieS UPDATE If you drivo past Old Crystal Bay Road and Highway 12, you will notice the City facilities project is progressing toward completion. The three buildinrs with the high-pitched gables are (north to south) the Council Chambers, the Administrative Offices and the Police Department. The long building to the east is the Public Works garage and offices. Construction of the Public Works building is expected to be complete in November. Construction of the Administrative buildings is expected to be corr.Dlete in December. r •# iy u WEST HENNEPIN RECYCUNG COMMISSION Greenfleld-Independence-Long Lakp-Loretto-Mapie Plain-Mcd'na-Orono Mapl« Ave. Maple Plain, MN 55359 476‘0012 K C.TV 0‘-'rm September 24, 1992 to:Mayor and City Council City of 6 SEP 2 5 1992 rroB:Amelia Kroeger IfflORC Recycling Coordinator Re:Preparing 1993 Budgets - Curbside Program/WHRC contribution At the direction of the WHRC commissioners, I have met with E-Z Recycling to negotiate curbside contracts for 1993. E-Z Recycling has agreed to continue servicing our cities at the 1992 contract amount. E-Z Recycling has also agreed to include magazines and 'shiny paper' catalogues as part of their curbside pick-up prograai beginning in January 1993 at no additional cost to WHRC cities. The NHRC budget for 1993 is yet to bo finalized, but promotion, administration and drop-site expenses combined will iwt increase fQf 1993. Therefore your WHRC contribution will not increase for 1993. My June 3, 1992 letter explained the new Hennepin County Recycling Grant entiUement program. For your 1993 budget purposes, refer to the items below. I have based your cities' estimat^ reimbursement from the grant program on ^7^— households, if your household figure is more than the figure used above, it is lap^rative that you advise me immidiately since the new entitlement is determined on the number of households in each City. 1993 Curbside Contract Amount IfHRC Contribution 1993 Total Costs Less grant reimbursement Estimated year-end condition * m 1993 curbside contract extension agreements will sent to you for signing before the end ol October. oct vmPC commissioner V • J X PRINTED 12-SCP-92 WEST HENNEPIN RECYCLING COMMISSION W.H.R.C. MEMBER CITY ABATEMENT REPORT CUMULATIVE YEAR TO DATE THROUGH—> August 1992 CURBSIDE CITY GREENFIELD INDEPENDENCE LONG LAKE LORETTO EST. TOTAL TONS-1992 582 000 1,133 887 162.000 ACTUAL TONS RECYCLED THIS MO. 7.950 18.545 11.470 3.395 ACTUAL TONS RECYCLED VTD 54.715 126.090 CURBSIDE ABATEMENT % VTD 14.1(m 16.69% 87.432 25.782 14 79% 23.87% MAPLE PLAIN 805.000 10075 88.198 16.43% MEDINA 1.243.000 17.400 148 680 17.97% ORONO -g:r SUB-TOTALS—CURBSIDE 3^57.000 8.069. 55.265 124.100 448.263 —979.360 DROPSITES CITY GREENRELD INDEPENDENCE MEDINA OTHER GOODWILL SUB-TOTALS—DROPSITES GRAND TOTAL ALL ABATEMENT 0.'I I I ACTUAL TONS RECYCLED THIS MO. 2.465 0.000 2.590 21.5^ 0.000 26.635 150.735 ACTUAL TONS RECYCLED YTD 16.110 6.308 13.638 147.679 27.113 Basammmm 210J47 1.190.200 V ■ <4- •r - TOTAL ABATEMENT %YTD 22.13% YTD W.H.R.C. ABATEMENT PERCENTAGE BY CHY AS OF August 1992 ^ PfUNTUON :VCUR>PAPSR %4PRINTED 12-SCP-92 WEST HENNEPIN RECYCLINQ COMMISSION W.H.R.C. MEMBER CITY PARTICIPATION REPORT CUMULATIVE YEAR TO DATE THROUGH-=> Auqum ims CITY GREEN-INDEPEN-LONG MAPLE FIELD DENCE LAKE LORETTO PLAIN MEDINA ORONO TOTAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOMES 490 936 624 142 512 1,010 2.700 6,414 916 # RECYCLING JANUARY 235 401 263 65 249 405 1.300 2.927 418 FEBrajARY 232 366 212 66 210 453 1.305 2.844 406 MARCH 260 440 306 84 214 470 M49 2.922 417 APRIL 244 405 260 52 246 451 1.492 3.152 450 MAY 271 411 2S4 75 236 461 1.436 3.141 449 JUNE 281 433 247 79 242 r 479 1.373 3.132 447 JULY 252 423 263 70 243 463 1.370 3.062 440 AUGUST 281 427 24S 78 238 446 1.380 3.097 442 SEPTEMBER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OCTOBER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 NOVaiBER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DECEMBER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AVO. f RECYCLINQ 257 413 256 71 235 454 1,352 3,097 434 NRECYCUNQ 52.42%44.12%41.04%50.07%45.86%44.91%50.06%47.35%47.35% lS6=r:T-.^T==88l W.H.R.C. MEMBER CITY PARTICIPATION CUMULATIVE Y.T.O. THROUQH->> August 1992 mtk m&m If —f “H I !>■ • Hr* ’ ’ - . ■41} - • ■ • 7 P«»NTiO ON HtCVCLiO PAPER