Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-24-1992 Council PacketHINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL HEETINQ HELD AUGUST 24, 1992 ROLL The Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Barbara Peterson, CounciImembers J. Olann Goetten, Gabriel Jabbour, Edward Callahan and Mary Butler. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorae, Building a Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, City Attorney Thomas Barrett, City Engineer Glenn Cook, Chief of Police Stephen Sullivan, and City Recorder Teri Naab. Mayor Peterson called the meeting t order at 7:00 P.M. (a1) CONSENT AGENDA Goetten added Item S6 to the Consent Agenda. Butler added Items S12 and 13. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 5, nays 0. Motions for all items adopted by consent agenda will be included In the minutes in their respective numerical order. (•2) LEAF STREET RECONSTRUCTION TO MSA STANDARDS Mayor Peterson noted she had receved several calls from residents unable to attend the last public Informat ion meet Ing regarding this Issue. She Informed them to attend this meeting to express thsir views. She opened the public information meeting at 7:03 p.m. Goetten stated that her main concern with the project was saving as many trees as possible. She advised oecause of the excellent job being done by the contractors, there have been fewer trees lost than anticipated. She stated in light of the area residents opposition of widening the road, she agreed with reconstructing the road outside the standards of MSA, but asked that the roadway be brought up to City standards. Butler concurred. a 24*Cook noted he would rather not reconstruct the width, as it would ce wider than the p-oject specifications Community only pay ^or the road once, ana noted the City may be forced in the near future to upgrade tne road. Mayor Peterson agreed with the majority opinion. UiWiiiKi Vi ■ i;. r-p- V,. -' MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 24, 1992 LEAF STREET - CONT. Cook advis«d that the section of road being prooosel at MSA standards wouid work weli in Orono and would actually minimize the impact on adjacent property. He felt they would be seeing more of this design in the future as roads are upgraded. Goetten commended Cook for following the Council’s directives so well and for saving as many trees as possible. Moorse asked how far they were on the project, and felt the staff may be giving a premature estimate of the number of trees to be saved during the project. Cook said they started at County Road 84 and Leaf Street, and have gone approximately 400’, moving northward. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to remove tea: Street from the MSA funding list. Ayes 5, nays 0. LNCO REPRESENTATIVE’S COMMENTS JoElien Hurr was present. She noted the LMCO will be considering at their next meeting, a recommendation to approve the license for North Shore Drive Marina, contingent on the applicant being in coeptlance with Orono’s code requirements. She informed them that th> Environment Committee will no id a special training session on O'-'ober 3, 1992 at Lord Fletchers, training persons to do monitoring of Lake Minnetonka for water quality. Jabbour volunteered to help with North Arm and Echo Bay. Callahan informed them that the Lake Use Committee wilt not meet khe following Wednesday. Jabbour announced that the Public Access Task Force has been doing an exceptional Job. He felt at the last meeting they took a step backward, but with the help of JoEiien, Scott Carlson, and the Fishermen’s Lobby, a consensus was formed to return to the original mode of operation. 11 jii • fJ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 24, 1992 tv I : fe-' f-v; • ■ PUBLIC COMMENTS Sf ?lf. h.r. *s much hish.r b.caus. of Individual, .uch as the.. gantlaman. Ha notad a waak latar a ,rfJ5|i*\o*thV*watarboat whila on tha I aka. Ha raportad tha *%*'’* PAtrol and Lt. Chaswick antwared with tha Natar apprahandad tha drivar of tha fishing boat. Ha fait Lt. Chaswick want out of his way In this matter. Jabbour thankad Chiaf Sullivan and his officars. Fr«nk St. Lawr.nc. 253 Cysn.t Place, noted that *"• '’O'J'i* assesament was dated August 7th and received August the deadline for pay oft of the assessment interest free is August 26th. Ha rsquastad an extension of that date. Moorse was unsure why the discrepancy regarding '*=•* ^^* stated by Statute, tha Council must allow a 30 day pay off period. Barrett advised ha would research tha auesV®^ Jh! Council has tha authority to extend tha deadline date outside tha State Statute limitations. It was moved by Butler, seconded by VftV’Lwar deadline data 30 days for prepayment of ®57tyProject aasastmant, subject to a favorable opinion by the City Attorney. Ayes 5, nays 0. (S93 A #4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It MSS movsd by Jsbbour, seconded by Geetten. to •oo;o’/e the minutes of the July 27, 1992 regular Council meeting. Ayes 5, y 0. It was moved by Jabbour, minutes of the August 10, nays 0. seconded by Goetten, to approve the 1992 regular Council meeting. Ayes b. (•9) 91730 GREGG MALIK, I?S2l*I5JS.5?I?S5 !?®SJSo[ut.oh .3,72 Gregg Malik was present. ■ i S-- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 24, 1992 ZONING FILE #1730 - CONT. Mabusth axplalnad that tha applicant has Installed the shared drive, and the Septic Inspector confirmed that the septic system Mas not destroyed. The septic system is now considered non- conforming as it is 6’ from the shared drive, and the applicant has one year In which to bring the system Into conformance. The existing drive will continue to serve during the construction period. The City is In receipt of a developer’s agreement and acceptable security to cover the restoration of the former driveway. It was moved by Goetten, seconced by Butler, to adopt Resolution •3172 for Application #1730 Gregg Malik, 3080 Sixth Avenue North, approving the final subdivision. Ayes 5, nays 0. (S#6) #1746 THOMAS 4 MARGARET LOWE, 2030 WE8T LAFAYETTE ROAD - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION 93173 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution •3173 for Appi Icatlon «1746 for Thomas and Margaret Lowe, 2630 West Lafayette Road, for a variance to construct an addition to the existing residence. Ayes 5, nays 0. (••7) 01783 SKIP MADGE S79 FOREST ARMS LANE - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION SSITA «... Xt was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution •3174 for Application si753 for Skip Madge, 875 Forest Ar,-nis Lane, approving average lakeshore setback variances. Ayes 5, nays 0. (••) SCOTT LARSON, 2112 SUQARWOOOS DRIVE - REQUEST DRIVEWAY REALIGNMENT Scott Larson was present. Mabusth explained tha first plan submitted was denied because of the driveway realignment, which did not meet the reouired standards. A straight alignment was approved for tne driveway when tha building permit was issued. Larson reviewed the layout of the property and the topography. He stated with this proposal he has tried tc install the entrance at a level closer to the elevation of the garage. Drainage will continue to flow from west to east. The proposed realignment disturbs none of the existing vegetation, and extends the character of Sugarwoods development. He noted with the proposed drive, excavating costs and retaining walIs will be kept to a minimum. h ■■■ 5^^ \x^L- ■ «■ .'- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 24, 1992 2112 SUGARWOOOS DRIVE - CONT. Larson fait tha drlva orovlOas character tor »ha sita and additional anhancamant tor tha Sugarwoods project. ”• will be planting S mature Graan Colorado Spruce and a Crimson Sipla, along with seasonal plants along tha front. Ha raquastad approval for raalignmant for tha driveway. jabbour asked it the lot area coverage calculation includes driveways. Mabusth advised It does and n^r^nv^to^rI" ‘1.1 ;li?:•d^hSri^f^orr"^c:;:rage problem on this property. Jabbour taIt tne ppf!|’|*nt^has p?«ad*more^emphasIs on :jvrn*g S'lU ^ag^a'^lor :h'’Pc'h?;'lm;Vr?ant to Orono. ^;arnt aVlVn--tor%hV-PI SnJ I nrco JrsVl'o',; *^d"t;\y‘S ^ Sn”;U ??mS to properly review tha Issue. Jabbour felt that was unfair to the Planning Commission. Larson agreed and said the Planning Commission also let him know that. Situation to begin with. Qoattar asked It builders are notified of the need tor special permission to realign the driveway in this development. Habusth indicated tha builder Is ‘“PB'.to -rira: .-s-ha-“aVk^;’th"ari^Sheet provided all builders within Sugarwoods development. Jabbour asUed if the realigned drive had been Installed? Mabusth noted work on the driveway was started, but the Inspector stopped work or* ti»e projecc. Goetten asked if trees will be destroyed with the straight a Iignment. ■! HINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELDi AUGUST 24, 1992 r:-.‘ ■ ‘ : 2112 SUGARWOODS DRIVE - CONT.Mabusth noted based on applicant’s information that they would lose more trees with the straight alignment. She reported she received a phone call from David Ahlers. neighbor to the north, in which he expressed opposition to the proposed drive as his privacy will be affected and that drive will have a visual impact from his residence because of the alignment between both drives. Callahan noted the builder obviously was notified of the requirement but did not unde-stand the severity of the request. He stated this issue Is a civi' war between the Planning Commission and developeij* of this property. Goetten asked if there was some way to alleviate future requests. Mabusth explained the original intent was to save the trees and minimize the impact in the front street setback area. She felt the straight aligned driveway may actually work against the intent of the PRD. She stated the would like to see the Planning Commission reconsider the Issue. She added the straight aligned drive has presented problems in dealing with the contractors who feel the whole Intent of the PRD was to maintain the natural buffer and screen residences from street activities and maintain overall natural setting. Jabbour noted after-the-fact applications rubs everyone the wrong way. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve the driveway realignment for Scott Larson of 2112 Sugarwoods Drive, and to note that the Council is in agreement with the frustration expressed by Planning Commissioner Bellows, but added that they should look at what is best for the site and the ecology. Ayes 5. nays 0. Goetten warned Larson to gain approval prior to beginning a project when building in Orono. (e#9) ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - SECTION 9.21 PUBLIC NUISANCE SECTION 9.23 PARTICIPATION IN NOISY PARTIES ORDINANCE #109, SECOND SERIES It was movad by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Ordinance Sioa, Second Senes to reinstate the puD I ic nuisance definition as Section 9.21 and readopt the Noisy Parties Ordinance as Section 9.23. Ayes 5, nays 0. ■-* ■ '-i - 1^5. , A-.' MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD AUGUST 24, 1992r'- :t ■ s■■•■.V l:' - - fi.' (himm (•10) MARINA LICENSE REVIEW >NORTH SHORE DRIVE MARINA LAKESIDE MARINA GAYLE'S MARINAGaffron axplained that the Lake Use Committee has recommended denial of the three marina licenses, based on specific code violations, which violations can be enforced.Callahan explained the Lake Use Committee based its recommendation on the fact that if the licenses were denied, there may be a problem with enforcement, whereas, if approved, nothing would get done in the near future to improve the situation. He felt that if the marinas were in violation of the code, they should not be granted a license. He added the Committee did not see a point in punishing the marinas in violation, and rather is more involved in updating the code which would deal with enforcement issues. Butler said not only are the marinas violating sections of the zoning code, but by not having a license, they would also violate the Iicensing code. Callahan felt they shcuid have the City Attorney review the issue to make sure there truly is a violation. Butler suggested that the Lake Use Committee concentrate on updating the ordinance. Callahan stated they had started to do that but marina owners want a response from the City each year as to whether they have a marina Iicense. Qoetten stated Callahan has done much work on Committee to get these issues going. the Lake Use It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Callahan, to deny 1992 marina licenses for the following: North Shore Drive Marina, Lakeside Marina, and Gayle’s Marina. Barrett suggested the Council adopt resolutions officially denying each of these license requests. Goetten amended her motion to direct staff tc draft appropriate denial resolutions. Callahan seconded the amendment. Ayes 4, nays 0. Jabbour abstained. y-:. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 24, 1992 (Mil) SHORELANO ORDINANCE - WAYZATA (PRELIMINARY FLEXIBILITY REQUEST It w®s wov#d by J^bbour, sscondcd by Go<tt0n« to Acc#pt th# information regarding the preliminary flexibility request from the City of Wayzata. Ayes 5, nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Callahan asked If the City wishes to respond to any of the shore I and ordinance flexibility requests, how they should go about doing so. Gaffron stated once the final draft has been sent to each City from the DNR for review, the City would have 45 days to make comments. He added the submittal from wayzata is just a preliminary document. Jabbour asked Gaffron If he was attending the Technical Corrmittee meetings. Gaffron stated he has attended the meetings regularly. Jabbour understood several Communities have hired a consultant to draft the ordinance, which he thought the Technical Committee was to do. Gaffron noted that some consultants have drafted documents that the DNR won’t accept. He said the Technical Committee meetings have become more a work shop session to review each city’s proposed ordinance. He stated that while we thought the original intent of the Committee was to provide a single ordinance for all 14 lake Communities, that quite apparently is not going to happen. ENGINEER’S REPORT (e«12) CHANGE ORDER «1 STUBBS BAY LIFT STATION It was moved by Jabbour. seconded by Qoetten, to authorize Change Order No. 1 for the Stubbs Bay Sanitary Sewer project Improvements. Ayes S, nays 0. (*•13) REQUEST FOR PAYMENT t1 - STUBBS BAY b.uSlTARY SEWER PROJECT It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Qoetten, to authorize Payment No. 1 for the StuODs Bay sanitary sewer project, to Progressive Contractors, Inc., in the amount of $116,255.77. Ayes 5, nays 0. ‘1 ;S-i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 24, 1992 (•14) BID AWARD FUEL STORAGE Moors* sxplainsd that discussions with vendors has lead to their recommendation of fiberglass below ground tanks. He noted the cost difference is $4,300. jabbour stated the fiberglass tanks will only cost $1,000 more. He explained the original request was for an estimate on steel and fiberglass tanks below ground. At that time, the fiberglass tanks were bid at double the price of the steel tanks, but that bid was based on retail figures. He said he advocated the above ground tanks as the fiberglass tanks were prohibitive in cost. He recently met with Gerhardson and the contractors. He stated the Council’s main concern was the Impact of the tanks on the environment. The contractor at that meeting recommended fiberglass below ground tanks with safety precaution*. Jabbour asked why the safety precautions were net included in the original bid, and he was told that the bid was based on minimum standards in order to secure the bid. He added the additional difference in cost is for the brine solution and other safety features, which should be purchased for either type of tank. He noted that all Target stores and the U.S. Postal Service have removed their underground tanks. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to award the fuel distribution system bid to Pump and Meter Company, for an amount not to exceed $72,209.00, to include two fiberglass tank* with brine solution and other safety features. Aye* 5, nay* 0. (•IS) APPLICATION OF CERTIFIC TE OF PAYMENT •• Jabbour stated that Boarman has told him that If the City keeps requesting revisions, they will be charged for those revision*. Qoetten asked about the $79,000 listed as a change order. Jabbour explained that it was for soil corrections done at the beginning of the project. Goetten asked about the status of the contingency fund. Moorse said he would brief the Council after the meeting with the contractors the following day. Jabbour asked that ail information pertaining to the project also be sent to Charlie Kelley. ■4 I V r i! ■ '‘v. ).r nv. ft •■> ■t. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 24. 1992 APPLICATION OF CERTIFICATE OF PAYMENT 96 - CONT. It was movad by But Iar. seconded by Goetten, to approve the Application and Certificate of Payment No. 6 for the City Hall and the Public Works building, as follows: Kraus-'Anderson Construction Co. Steenberg-Watrud Construction Co. Gephart Electric Kramer a Davis Qresser Concrete/Masonry Allied Mechanical Stelninger Construction $21,340.15 83.799.00 22.529.30 1.341.00 19.799.10 24.245.00 40,434.20 Ayes 5, nays 0. (•18) COMBINED CHANGE ORDER FOR CITY FACILITIES TO REFLECT CURRENT BUDGET STATUS Moorse explained they did not receive the information regarding this issue. (•17) SELECTION OF COUNCILMENBER(S) TO SERVE ON LONG LAKE FIRE CONTRACT tfORK GROUP Moorse explained that at the last meeting, it was suggested during the fire contract reviewai process, the City Council be represented at the work sessions. He stated this would not be an advisory committee, but merely a work group to review the details of the contract. Callahan felt the negotiations are an administrative matter and the City Administrator and Police Chief should continue the negotiat ions. He added he appreciated the invitation to the work sessions. He suggested the negotiators be instructed to negotiate on the following bases: a) they accept the offer made by Long Lake contingent upon Long Lake contribut in:i $28,000 to the capital budget, and b) that the Committee be informed as to the relative positions of Orono and running the department, i.e. 80X of the fires and the funding is contributed by Orono. He felt that fact should be recognized. Jabbour reiterated that the Council is appreciative of the invitation, but explained that Orono traditlonaiiy has left administrative issues to staff. Callahan felt the invitation would allow them to find out how the department actually functions, but added most of their questions were more technical. !! , 5 : i i HIMUTE8 OF THE HEETIHO long lake fire contract work group - COMT. eutl.r r.tt.r.fd. th. last commant ma<,. the \\ ha'i"®lost confidence In the system, and was SSS: wl^UnsTo‘volttVer a lot of staff time for this Issue. Callahan noted the '°"*Tact needs to be sett led wlthin 30 days^^a^^ f«lt th«r« would not be much staff time invoivsa a timeframe. department service areas together ?T:r;:;a^^ln^^^srn;.'d^£sr^^^^^ n w'‘‘th*eTeVld'ent''» ‘to* work throu,h «;;;/Vnd"d‘ecl'irons'*^^^ 5^:t:rs‘h:‘w«luT5Ve‘''h‘ap‘py*rh7lVwrth the prSc. .. felt may be very informative. Mayor Peterson feit that the tendency is to combine issues and felt that should not happen with this issue. jabbour asked that he set a summary of the last 5 years of the capital expenditure fund. RICH Perry. cont^?n%39,000. He for new equipment. Aft**^ invest the money themselves, ;j?'a*i"o*? t‘hr.n‘d'’•of^'9%•^«hrc*lt‘y^^Lo•n^ Lake took over control of the funds in that account. ^:coSn:z•er't“hlr*th‘,r'irVEoTo^•nrs^*f'’*a‘ll^ Perry noted It doesn't matter who o""* ** •’* traded in for new equipment when needed. iTZ'x rf®L!|ir?aJI*'H2'-« cSncSr^'d'tnifm^'or be procured with Long Lake’s bonding rate. 4 ■t" MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 24, 1992 LONG LAKE FIRE DEPARTMENT WORK GROUP • CONT. C«l lahan not«d In tha minutas of tha July FIra Oapartmant maatlngs, tha Mayor of Long Laka diacuatad a major purchase in 1993, tha raault of which would ba that tha dapartmant would not ba abla to maka othar purchaaaa for a numbar of yaara. Parry did not ramambar what that Involved, but did not faal that waa faaalbla. Jabbour aald that Parry la doing a raaponaIb111ty la to fight firaa. graat job and addad hi a It waa movad by Callahan, aacondad by Jabbour, to continue to appoint aa nagotlatora, tha City Administrator and whomever ha aalacts to work with him In dealing with tha Long Lake FIra Dapartmant contract, and that tha City AdmlnIatrator ba Instructed to negotiate along tha lines that tha City will pay $76,000 for tha full service of tha Long Laka FIra Oapartmant, contingent upon Long Laka contributing 928,000 to tha capital budget for machinery, and that a Joint committaa ba aatabliahad to review tha fire chief and assistant fire chief's contracts, and to direct tha committaa to attempt to obtain for Orono tha position that its contribution to tha whole process daaarvaa, and to report tha results of tha negotiation at tha September I4th meeting. Ayes 5, nays 0. (918) E8TA8LI8H A WORK SESSION TO DISCUSS LONG LAKE FIRE SERVICE PROmSAL No action required. (#19) ASSESSMENT DEFERRAL INCOME ADJUSTMENT - RESOLUTION 83175 Moorsa explained that this is an updating of income limits for tha City's special assessment deferral program. In tha past, tha rata has bean sat tha same as HUO’s lowest limit. That numbar has not baon updated for a numbar of years. It was movad by Butler, seconded by Mayor Paterson, to adopt Resolution 8317S amending tha program for deferment of special •taasamants for parsons 65 years of age or older. Ayes 5, nays 0. (a820) CAROLE HA8EMAN PERFORMANCE REVIEW 8 SALARY ADJUSTMENT It was movad by Jabbour, seconded by Goat tan, to authorize a wage adjustment for Carole Hasaman from Lav# 4, Step I ($10,492 par hour) to Laval 4, Step II ($11.109 per hour) affective September 9, 1992. Ayes 5, nays 0. iv: i ■ ■■' ‘-r:r: V . ■,;!;-• v:. i-i- ’ . . r‘ *'• • ■■i:; I ■ ;:":• . • MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 24, 1992 (*•21) TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT GOLF COURSE It was mov«d by Jabbour, seconded by Qoetten, to authorize the employment of Thomas Kampmeyer as a temporary counter helper at the Golf Course at an hourly rate of $5.00 effective August 25, 1992. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*•22) RESIGNATION STEPHEN JOHNSTON - PARK COMMISSION MEMBER It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Qoetten, to accept Stephen Johnston's resignation and to draft a letter of appreciation for Council's signature, and to place an ad In the local newspaper to advertise the opening. Ayes 5, nays 0. «««« It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to schedule a Truth in Taxation Hearing for December 1, 1992 and a secondary meeting for December 9, 1992. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*•23) LICENSES It was moved by Jabbour, following Iicenses: seconded by Goetten, to approve the Gear West Ouathon 5k run - 30k bike - 4k run September 27, 1992 from 7:00 to 10.30 a.m. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*•24) BILLSIt was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Ayes 5, nays 0. ADJOURNMENTIt was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to adjourn the regular Orono City Council meeting at 8:52 p.m. to Executive Session. Ayes 5, nays 0. Barbara Peterson, Mavor 'Od^thy aliin. City Clerk 4 i -■? .4’i i ■V i ■ I ■‘^1 •=v51 111 AGENDA rOR COUNCIL HBBTING 8BT FOR HONDAYf AUGUST 24, 1992, 7:99 P.M.(*)Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon request. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder.> •lb T ^imcROIYOP ROLL CALL1. CONSENT AGENDA* 2. Leaf Street Reconstruction to MSA Standards APPROVAL OP NINUTBS * 3. Regular Meeting of July 27, 1992 * 4. Regular Meeting of August 10, 1992 LAKE HINNBTONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT - JoEllen Hurr Representative PUBLIC C0NHBNT8 - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) SORING ADMINISTRATOR ’S RBPORT **APPLICANTS** iNMdiately after the Council hee peviewed your application please sign the three (3) original resolutions at the Recorder's desk. Applicants need not esecute resolutions for subdivisions, vacations and denials. 5. #1730 Gregg Malik, 3060 Sixth Avenue North - Final Subdivision - Resolution 6. #1746 Thomas k Margaret Lowe, 2630 Wc-i*; Lafayette Road - Variance - Resolution * 7. #1753 Skip Madge, 875 Forest Arms Lane - Variances - Resolution 8. Scott Larson, 2112 Sugarwoods Drive - Request Driveway Realignment * 9. Ordinance Amendment - Section 9.21 Public Nuisance - Section 9.23 Participation In Noisy Parties 10. Marina License Review - North Shore Drive Marina - Lakeside Marina - Gayle's Marina * 11. Shoreland Ordinance - Wayzata (Preliminary Flexibility Request) HATOR/COONCIL RBPORT BNGINBBR RBPORT 12. Change Order 41 Stubbs Bay Lift Station 13. Request for Payment #1 - Stubbs Bay Sanitary Sewer Project s- -4 M3BIIDA FOR COONCIL NBBTItIG 8BT FOR HOHDAT, A0GU8T 24, 1992, 7:9f F.M. 15. CITY ADMIRI8TRATOR*8 REPORT 14. Bid Award Fual Storage Application of Certificate of Payment #6 Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Steenberg-Watrud Construction Company Kramer and Davis Crasser Concrete/Masonry 16.wrm conscrucrion ange Order for City Facilities to Reflect Current Serve on Long Lake Fire 18. h:. I' # # * 19. 20a 21a 22a Group Establish a Work Session to Discuss Long Lake Fire Service ProposalAssassmant Deferral Income Adjustment ~ Resolution Carole Hasaman Performance Review & Salary Adjustment Temporary Employment Golf Course Resignation Stephen Johnston — Park Commission Member CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT LICENSES (23*) •ILLS (24*) JIDJOORNHBNT INFORMATION ITEMS INCLUDED IN COONCIL PACKET vrinutas of the Orono Planning Commission Meeting 8/3/92 Minnehaha Creak Watershed District Letter Dated 7/13/92 Received 8/14/92 M:lnnasota Environmental equality Board Letter Dated 8/10/92 MlNca11anaous OfC^iaG ISSOIS SMP events 11/29 - Isii p.m. Meeting with MnDOT Madiator/Routing of Highway 12 SS/2% - Council Meeting 7 p.m. •f/25 - Filing Opens for City Office - November 3rd Election > Lake Use Committee 7:45 a.m. > HOLIDAY - Labor Day (Monday) . Last Day to File for City Office 5 p.m. - November 3rd Election • Planning Commission 7 p.m. • Council Meeting 7 p.m. • State Primary Election - No Meetings Before 8 p.m. 98/26 99/97 99/98 99/98 99/14 99/15 i i vi 1 • 'V* m •i* -■3 r ConOTissicn Council PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE a. PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS 1, C*c. ^rxCrff r NAME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) ------1---------- •><^0 U)JlLu^li 9. 10. 11. kJULL I •{' 12. 'ih >:, 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20.i ■! as ■iSii^irMeai II11 I i~li II Tot Dotot Ron Moorsor City Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director August 21, 1992 nnotlO JO AUO 2661 ^ 2 9nV 0iMIi23i/U lIC^NnOO Snbjoctt Leaf Street Reconstruction to Municipal State Aid Standards (MSA) On August 10, 1992 Council conducted a public information meeting to consider upgrading Leaf Street to MSA standards following the construction of sanitary sewer. The concern of the residents on Leaf Street was the tree and vegetation reamval as well as losing the rural character of the road by widening and installing concrete curb, gutter and storm sewer. It was indicated to residents and Council that the sanitary construction «rould require r«K>vaI of trees and vegetation worm so than widening the road to 28 feet. The construction of sewer on Leaf Street has begun and we have been very fortunate that considerably fewer trees and shrubs have had to be removed than expected. In fact, in that section as conditions are today, we would have to remove more trees and shrubs for street construction than the sewer construction. However, it is staff's opinion that the road should still be constructed to MSA standards for the following reasons! 1. 2. 3. 4. Cost savings to all City property owners. Correct and improve several drainage probloM. Safer road. Any trees that must be removed can be replaced two for one. 5."Clean up* several site distance problems. These should be done regardless of the type of roadway that is recontructed. Isv ■%^64 •-'1 - I ■'N if 1 ^ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING ^ 4 1992HELD JULY 27, 1992 CIIYOFOBOIIOROLL # r*.v Th# Council m«t on tho above date with the following members present: Acting Mayor J. Oiann Goetten, Counci I members GabrielJabbour, Mary Butler and Edward Callahan. Mayor Barbara Peterson was absent. The following represented the City staff: CityAdministrator Ron Moorse, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, City Attorney Kevin Staunton, City Engineer Glenn Cook, Assistant Chief of Police Gary Cheswick, and City Recorder Terl Naab. Acting Mayor Goetten called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. (•1) CONSENT AGENDA Butler added Items #3, 4, 5 and 7 and removed Items #13 and 14. Goetten removed Item «22. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 4, nays 0. Motions for ail items adopted by consent agenda will be included In the minutes In their respective numerical order. («92) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to approve the minutes of the regular Council meetings held on July 13, 1992. Ayes 4, nays 0. LNCD - JOELLEN HURR REPRESENTATIVE Hurr asked if any of the Council Members planned to attend the Public Officials' Boat Tour on Saturday. Hurr asked that a copy of the court settlement regarding North Shore Drive Marina be submitted to the LMCD. She stated she has a copy of the styrofoam ordinance. She noted that the LMCD is concerned with more than Just styrofoam docks. Jabbour noted he is expecting more scientific data on the subject and will pass It along to the LMCD. Hurr noted that the Environment Committee was granted a one day extension to respond on the Highway 12 issue. This response has been adopted by the LMCD. ■m #■ •i '.V-:' 1 r.'V: k-. A. m h I -4^ • ■ J'v-;. if rfrVj [v: ■■■'^<: 11^' ■';/ :.* i •■: ifx. !?■ ,^v \'jf ■: ■ •- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 LMCD REPRESENTATIVE'S COMMENTS - CONT. Jabbour asked that those comments be sent to the watershed District. Hurr stated that the LMCD has approved the Big Island Inc. 1992 dock license. Saffron said that Big Island Inc. has applied for its 1992 license, which the Counci I wi I I review at the August 10th meeting for either adoption or referral to the Lake Use Committee. Hurr noted that Lakeside Marina has been given 10 days to provide an as-built survey. She sdded that there has been discussion at the LMCD regarding confiict cf interest with regards to sailors and yacht clubs. Goetten inquired about the ash project committee. Hurr reported there has been an initial meeting, with a tour of the burn facility scheduled for next Wednesday. («#3) 91782 GEORGE W. KALWEIT, 4285 FOREST LAKE DRIVE - AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE - RESOLUTION 93142 It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Resolution 93142 for Application 91752 for George W. Kalweit, 4265 Forest Lake Drive, approving an after-the-fact variance to allow major structural improvements of an existing deck located within the 75* setback area. Ayes 4, nays 0. («94) 91754 E. LEO BULLOCK, 2940 CASCO POINT ROAD - AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE - RESOLUTION 93143 It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Resolution 93143 for Application *1/54 for E. Leo Bullock of 2940 Casco Point Road, approving after-the-fact variances to permit structural repairs to an existing deck. Ayes 4, nays 0. (S95) 91756 ROBERT E. WILSON, 4156 HIGHWOOO ROAD - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION 93144 It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Resolution 93144 for Application 91756 for Robert E. Wilson of 4156 Highwood Road, approving variances to permit the reconstruct ion of a three season screened porch. Ayes 4, nays 0. - .V I- I 4 1 ■i :4 •■<1 iilib iiiiu : MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD JULY 27. 1992sh«d1992 Kh«r th« tion >lnt irat -1' •■.r (•6) PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE - BAN ON STYROFOAM DOCK FLOTATION ORDINANCE »104, SECOND SERIESand notad tha dlffarancas. But Iar statad sha was willing to adopt whatavar is raasonabla. but did not wish to drag out tha procass longar th^ ”*®**^*'7’i t^hl raquastad that styrofoam buoys also ba bannad and raquastad It ba addad to tha languaga of tha ordinanca. Callahan submittad a ravisad draft ordinanca which Includas a praambla, providas for tha ordinanca to ba Includad undar tha public nulsanca taction of tha coda, and dafinas non-ancasad Styrofoam In a similar way. Ha notad his non-conforming structuras to ba ramovad by *^*®®*"****^ addad that most marinas using thasa structuras hava J**” for soma tima, and ha fait five yaars was too long to allow this practica to continua. Jabbour notaH that this is the third season of use for all tha marinas using .tyrofoam structures. Murr stated that tha LMCD approved floating docks, but not a »p.elfVc typ«. ShB notpd that tha LMCD is an prdinanea bannlnj tha uaa ofordinance ba reworded, changing City waters to City lim Jabbour asked how tha proposed ordinanca addresses replacamant of existing docks. Callahan aupgastad addinfl, •this axcaptlon doss not Includa tha right to repair or replace”. tion iood iraa v5; 3 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 OfiOINANCE #104, SECOND SERIES - CONT. Jabbour reported that at the public hearing, Mr. Ounn stated he felt the City had not researched the issue enough and provided names of contacts. Jabbour said he talked to a Fred Hunt, Consulting Engineer and expert on floating docks, who reported that the styrofoam is the worst possible way of doing anything. Hunt said there are issues that no one has thought about including the danger of using styrofoam around gas and oiI, and ultra-violet rays breaking up the foam faster. Jabbour stated that United Design Association reported that if the styrofoam is to be encased, it should be done with a metai and plastic layer. Neil Ross, President of International Marine Institute, stated that styrofoam is a nation-wide problem. Jabbour said that everyone he talked to was willing to back the City’s position. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to adopt Ordinance #104, Second Series, with the following corrections: First page, subdivision 1 - “Docks, platforms, buoys, and other floating structures. . Change “City waters'* to "City limits'*. Subdivision t - "Gasoiine, fumes, ..." delete the word fumes. Subdivision 3, Page 2 - include buoys. Subdivision 3, Paragraph B - "This exception does not include repairing or replacing the existing styrofoam. Ayes 3, nays 0. Qoetten abstained. Goetten felt that they did not have enough time to review the proposed ordinance. Gaffron asked that the Sub-section be changed as that number has already been used. Callahan felt it best fit at the end of the chapter. He added that the marina owners were given an opportunity to discuss the issue at the Lake Use Committee meetings, and they have been a.Wised throughout the entire process. Qoetten asked to review the amended ordinance at the next meeting. : • r..i_ ^ ■.1- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27. 1992 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT A) Butl«r r«qu«st«d Council b« providod with a list of approvtd solicitort in tha future. She said she was unaware that the City even issued the licenses. Jebbour stated the license should also list the standards for approval. Moorse said he would review those standards. B) Jabbour reported that the LMC0*s Task Force has hired a mediator to form a consensus from the meetings. He thanked the City of Minnetrista ano Scott Carlson for their support and thanked Dick Cherba for the use of the plane. He explained that the summary included in the report is based on old criteria, but the Task Force has requested the summary be changed to be based on new criteria. Jabbour explained that the DNR has counted 217 car/trailer parking spaces, but based upon the ONR’s old criteria there are actueiiy 645 parking spaces available. He said the DNR has agreed to allow 10X credit for parking of vehicles with canoes, jet skis and other recreational vehicles. He has suggested to the DNR to reduce the number of parking spaces by 145 to get to the 700 parking spaces mentioned before. He added the Fisherman’s Lobby has supported Orono's position. He said he has been told by the DNR that this is the last study they are doing on Lake Minnetonka, and feels Orono is trying to stall the DNR. ENQ1NCER*8 REPORT (S97) PAY REQUEST BS HIGHWAY 12 FRONTAGE ROAD - SEWER, WATER A STREET IMPROVEMENT It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, request for payment to B A 0 Underground, Inc. $15,520.21 for trunk Highway 12 frontage road, street Improvements. Ayes 4, nays 0. to authorize the for an amount of sewer, water and CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (§§) FUEL STORAGE BID AWARD Moorse reviewed a memo on insurance and a memo from the Building Official regarding above versus below ground tanks. He stated that underground tanks are less expensive Initially. There does not appear to be a great difference in future insurance costs for underground tanks, but that is difficult to determine. *U V •il i imdMa MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 FUEL STORAGE BID AWARD > CONT. Garhardson introducad Mika Kaale, raorasantatIva from Pump and Matar. Kaala statad tha undarground system his company bid is a doubla tank systam, alactronicaily monitorad, and anchorad into tha ground. Ha notad that tha govarnmantal agancias ara in tha procass of ravamping tha ragulations govarning abova-ground tanks. Jabbour askad if Kaale would racommand fibarglass varsus staal. Kaala said ha would. Jabbour askad about acological affacts. Kaala axplainad that tha tanks undarground ara no longar a singla tank. Goattan axplainad thay ara vary concarnad with tha anvironmantal Issues, and have actually raquirad others to remove undarground tanks. Kaala indicated tha risk factor is tha same for both types of tanks. Jabbour notad that thay ware told that fiberglass tanks would be approximately double tha price. Kaala fait that estimate to be incorrect, and noted that both fiberglass and staal would be approximately the same price. explained that the tanks now have a 1/2" thick protective coating and there has been so much new technology in this field to perfect the tanks. Callahan askad about potential for problems if there is a leak in- ground. Ha gathered that there is a move to more abova-ground tanks and that is why tha new ragulations ara being drafted. Kaala notad abova-ground tanks ^ra Just an option which needs to be addressed. Ha statad that al i tha probes on tha undarground tanks ara accessible through manholes, and guaranteed that thay would never have to dig up tha tanks, to repair or replace monitoring equipment. e ■MMMW '/• a € - y: r .L MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 FUEL STORAGE BID AWARD - CONT. Jabbour said ha faals strongly against undarground tanks. Ha notad that avarything that could happan to tha tanks, actually has happanad. Kaala indicatad that most laaks ara causad by ovarfilling tha tanks. Jabbour undarstood that batwaan 1993 and 1995 tha EPA may changa laws govarning supar funds, and may raquira tank ownars to pay a largar portion for any claanup costs. Frank St. Lawranca. 253 Cygnat Placa, statao ha has a friand who it a formar ampioyaa of tha PCA who told horror atorias about tha old tanks and wondarfui atorias about tha naw undarground tanks. Ha aald as a citizan ha would rathar not hava to look at abova ground tanks. Jabbour ramindad tham that thay can usa tha axisting tanks until thay coma to a dacision or gat mora information on futura changas. Ha ttatad that undarground tanks would raquira tha City to carry spacialty insuranca. Garhardson statad ha has talkad to Pat ' >nnady who pointad out that tha City has insuranca through tha I igua of Minnasota Citias, which is much chaapar than from tha p' vata sactor. Butlar axprassad har concarn with tha high watar tabla on tha sita. Kaala said tha tanks would ba anchorad to concrata, fillad with product and would be cappad. Callahan notad ha is not satisfiad with what ha is haaring. Goat tan said aha would ba siora comfortabia approving abova-’ground tanks. Jabbour askad if Ecovault masts currant standards. Kaala agraad that thay do, but ramindad tham that those standards may changa. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butlar, to tabla approval of tha fuel storage bid award. Ayes 4, nays 0. i ■4 % ^•Vl i 1 '\U'^ if’- i:-; MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 (•9) CITY CLEAN UP A YARD WASTE COSTS Moorse explained the clean up program provides for a fa ' clean up. He referred to costs of the clean up. He noted that because of the great volume collected during both the spring clean up and the yard waste program, the cost was over budget for the amount designated for both clean ups and the recycling program. He stated a iarge portion of the spring clean up amount was construction debris. Qoetten felt they must make changes now to be able to continue the program. She said that people pay to have appliances removed from their homes, and felt they should pay the nominal fee for bringing appliances to the clean up. Jabbour asked if the additional construction debris is because of the inability to burn. Gerhardson agreed that may be adding to the volume. Jabbour suggested that the City not accept any construction material. He said he is against raising the annual recycling fee. Callahan asked staff to suggest fees for all types of materials being brought to dispose of for Council to review at their next meeting. Mr. Furchner saJd that Wayzata charges $.50 per bag of yard waste. (•10) FIRE SERVICE ALTERNATIVES Moorse suggested reviewing the alternatives during a work session. Butler asked the boundaries of peripheral cities. Moorse stated they include Mound, Maple Plain and wayzata and several scenarios include expanding the peripheral cities* boundaries to cover the entire City. Goetten asked if Moorse wi I I supply the Counci i with response times and costs at the work session. Moorse asked if the Council wished response times for ail six scenarios. Butler thought only Alternatives «3 and 6 were necessary. a -I » ■4 'i •r:’ I rilin' TliM r i NINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 FIRE SERVICE ALTERNATIVES - CONT. Jabbour auggastad discjssing tha altarnativas with tha Long Laka Fira Chiaf. Ha addad that the Long Laka Firaman ara graat and addad that probably about two-thirds ara rasidants of Orono. Butch Loomis, Assistant Fira Chiaf of Long Laka, was present. Goattan told him that tha Council has tha greatest respect for tha firaman on tha Department. Butler explained that Orono’s concern about the fire depar*mant is that Orono funds 80% of the administrative costs of tha Loi.g Laka Fire Department and has 0% authority with regards to administrutiva decisions. Jabbour asked Loomis if tha department was In need of anything. Loomis noted they need to replace one truck, but fait they had adequate equipment to cover tha Orono area. Goattan stated she took graat offense to Dan Reed's comments at tha Highway 12 meeting. Callahan said there have been comments about the firemen being in danger having to cross Highway 12. Loomis felt that those man cross tha highway during their normal lives, and fait there should be no difference whan on tha way to a fire. Ha addad that tha man ara taught that they must obay all traffic regulations and never put themselves in danger whan traveling to tha fira. Ha asked if Orono has tried to work with tha City of Long Laka regarding the administrative concerns. Jabbour noted that tha Councii has triad vary hard to work with tna City of Long Laka, but has not gotten satisfactory results. Ha fait that Orono should be allowed to taka over tha administration of the fira department. Goattan asked that Loomis forward information on tha number of homes in Orono that Long Lake Fire Department services. A work session was scheduled for Thursday, July 30, 1992 at 3:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. The Council requested that Gary Cheswick attend in the Police Chief’s absence. t,r- K>: -y- I ■ f-' ¥ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MIETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 (*•11) AMENDING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE STUBBS BAY SEWER PROJECT - RESOLUTION «3145 It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Resolution 43145 adopting Stubbs Bay sanitary sewer assessment roll. Ayes 4, nays 0. (««12) ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO ALLOW AN EXTENDED TIME PERIOD OF HOOKUP TO THE NEW STUBBS BAY SEWER SYSTEM - ORDINANCE 4105, SECOND SERIES It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to remove this Item from the consent agenda. Ayes 4, nays 0. Callahan thought that Council had decided that if a connection to the sewer was deemed necessary under the standards of the City, a property would be made to do so. He noted the ordinance proposed allows five years to all properties. Qoetten thought it was decided that if a problem were found with the existing system, the property must be immediately connected to the sewer. Gaffron explained that if each existing system were examined more closely, the City would find up to 95W of the existing trench systems do not meet current standards for separation from mottling, and therefore would be considered as non-conforming. He noted that requiring 16 month connection deadlines for 95X of the Stubbs Bay propertIes was not his impression of Council’s intent at the public hearing. Butler said that if the system is failing to the point that a holding tank is necessary or effluent is discharging, the property must be connected immediately. Callahan felt that the situation in the Stubbs Bay area is a bad situation and the soil is being bothered by this situation. He wants those resiaents to hook up as soon as possibie. Jabbour noted that at the last meeting. Council left the determination of the need to hook up to the sole discretion of staff. Gaffron noted that with the new shore I and regulations adopted, many more systems will be found to be non-conforming. He said when a permit or variance is requested, staff looks at the system for conformance. Callahan thought the Septic Inspector was hired to go house-to- house to inspect existing systems. isaiiN r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 ORDINANCE 9105, SECOND SERIES - CONT. Saffron noted the Inspector has not yet added soil borings to his normal maintenance procedure, although that Mill likely occur in the future due to the shore I and requirements. Callahan added that the base areas of the project are in serious need of the sewer and should have to connect immediately. He felt that the deadline date was extended to allow those in other areas, such as Cygnet Place and Leaf Street with an acceptable system, additional time to connect. Goetten agreed with Callahan. She thought the number of residents allowed the full five year time period would be very small. Jabbour stated he felt that those with a working system, should be allowed the additional time. He said with the restrictions so severe now, almost all systems would be found non-conforming. Moorse remembered a number of residents at the public hearing concerned about the criteria used by staff for conformance. Jabbour felt that part of the negotiation with the residents was a compromise on the connection deadline date. He felt the Council should adhere to their original decision. Butler thought the Intent was to change the current ordinance to allow 60 months for connection instead of the current 16 months. She said she did not envision a whole new set of regulations. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to adopt Ordinance •105, Second Series, extending the time period for hook-up to the new Stubbs Bay sewer system. Ayes 3, nays 0. Callahan abstained. (•13) AMENDMENT TO THE CITY’S FEE SCHEDULE CONCERNING THE SEVER SERVICE CHARGE FOR UN-CONNECTED PROPERTIES - ORDINANCE •106, SECOND SERIES Moorse explained this is a change in poiicy allowing the Stubbs Bay area residents up to five years to connect to the sewer If their current septic system is not failing, and waiving the service charge during that interim period. Qoetten asked if Orono is billed from the M.w.C.C. for those properties during that time. Moorse stated that this Is the City’s billing for sewer and Orono will not be billed by M.W.C.C. for the additional properties until they connect. 1 r :: L". ' MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 ORDINANCE *100. SECOND SERIES CONT. Butler suggested that the wording be changed for the paragraph that starts out "Stubbs Bay Area Project. . . " to "All properties will pay the City portion of quarterly billing beginning with service availability and biliing will include the Metropolitan waste Control Commission charge upon connection to system". It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Qoetten, to adopt Ordinance •106, Second Series, as amended. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*•14) ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO ALLOW PARTIAL PRE-PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS - ORDINANCE PIOT, SECOND SERIES Butler asked that the ordinance clarify when the interest accrued is to begin. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Ordinance •107, Second Series, permitting partial pre-payment of special assessment for Stubbs Bay sewer project ei3937, as amended. Ayes 4, nays 0. (•15) APPLICATION OF CERTIFICATE OF PAYMENT •S It was moved by Butler, seconded by Jabbour, to approve City Hall and Pub Iic Works BuiIdings A.chitect *s appiicat Ion and certificate for Payment #5 as follows: Kraus-Anderson Construction Co. Steenburg-Watrud Construction Co. Qephart Electric Mol in Concrete Qresser Concrete/Masonry Allied Mechanical $21.853.18 27,000.00 22.311.00 6,331.00 29.609.10 12.347.00 Ayes 4, nays 0. Jabbour asked when they would be given the final cost of the project. Moorse said they have not been given this information to date as the General Contractor is continually trying to find ways to reduce the amount. 4 I t V I ■ ^ .1. u ■ MINUTFS OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 («9ie) SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENTS i RESOLUTION YEAR XVIII COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM - RESOLUTION 93146 It was movad by Butlar, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Resolution •3146 authorizing Mayor and City Administrator to execute subrecipient agreement Mith Hennepin County for the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program. Ayes 4, nays 0. (•17) FALL NEWS LETTER Goetten felt they should send out a newsletter, and suggested including an update on Highway 12 and information on the styrofoam ordinance. Butler felt that if the Cable Commission intends to include a newsletter to be sent with the City’s newsletter, they should be made to pay half of the cost. All Members agreed. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to authorize sending out a fall newsletter, and if the Cable Commission is to include a newsletter, they must pay half of the postage. Ayes 4, nays 0. (••IB) AMENDING DESIGNATED SIGNATURES FOR POST DISBURSEMENT MONEY - RESOLUTION 93147 It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Resolution •3147, designating signatures for the Minnesota Board of Peace Officer Standards and Training Disbursement Money. Ayes 4, nays 0. (•19) PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING CONCERNING LEAF STREET RECONSTRUCTION TO MSA STANDARDS Jabbour asked how long the City has before they must use the MSA funds for this year. Cook indicated for this year, there is no deadline for the use of thoee funds, however. Council needs to make a decision at the next Council meeting in order to allow time to draft the plans for the project and get authorization to use the MSA funds. Butler asked to review the analysis before the informational meet Ing. Hoorse noted he will send out that Information and Council may discuss the Issue prior to the informationai meeting. A public informational meeting regarding Leaf Street reconstruct ion to MSA standards has been scheduled on August 10, 1992. during the regular Council meeting. 1 f • MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27. 1992 (•20) JOINT MEETING WITH PLANNING COMMISSION Moorse noted this is a Joint meeting with the Planning Commission to discuss the proposed ice hockey arena. It was agreed to have a joint meeting with the Planning Commission on August 17, 1992 after the scheduled Planning Commission meeting, at approximately 8:00 p.m. Jabbour asked that it be announced at the beginning of the work session that this is not a public information meeting. (•21) COUNCIL PARTICIPATION IN CORN PAYS PARADE Goetten announced that the Mayor will be riding in her own car. All Members said they do not wish to participate in the parade. (••21A) TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT ORONO GOLF COURSE It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to authorize hiring Robert Oressel, Jr. at the Golf Course at an hourly rate of $5.00 effective July 28, 1992. Ayes 4. nays 0. ATTORNEY'S REPORT The Counci I adjourned to Executive Session at 10:00 p.m. to discuss pending Iitigat ion. (•22) LICENSES Goetten noted she disagrees with the granting of the trapping permit for beavers. She noted the permit runs from June 8th to August 8th and allows for up to 20 beaver to be caught. She felt this is excessive. Moorse explained that the conditions were extracted from the ONR permit, and noted that trapping has not begun on the property. Butler asked If there wasn't some other way to capture the beavers and move them off the property. Goetten said she appreciated the need to move the beavers on, but felt they should look at other alternatives. Jabbour suggested reducing the number of beaver allowed to be trapped to 5 or 6 beaver. ii-. r I-i: jLf> MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 LICENSES - CONT. It was moved by Goat ten, seconded by Butler, to deny the Limited Leghold Trap Permit for Richard Hassel. Ayes 2, nays 2. Jabbour and Callahan voted nay. Motion failed. Sutter said if the appiicant wanted to come up with some other way of capturing the beaver, she would approve the license. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to approve the Limited Leghold Trap Permit for Richard Hassel, with the condition that the appIIcant only be al lowed to trap 5 beaver and he try to use a I ive trap instead of the leghold trap. Ayes 2, nays 2. Callahan and Goetten voted nay. Motion failed. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to table approval of the Limited Leghold Trap Permit for Richard Hassel. Ayes 4, nays 0. Motion carried. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to approve the following Iicenses; Septic System Installer License - Barfkecht Excavating Annual Home Occupation License Renewal - Heliotrope Garden Oesign One Day Set-up Permit - Smith College Club Ayes 4, nays 0. (M23) BILLS It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Ayes 4, nays 0. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to adjourn the regular OronoCIty Council meeting at 10:00p.m. to Executive Session. Ayes 4, nays 0. J. Oiann Goetten, Acting Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hal I in. City Clerk r IIAUG 2 4 1992MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MM(ll||<hc ARASIAHELD AUGUST 10, 1S92 WTT W UllUlillROLLTh« Council mot on th« abov* data with tha following mambars prasant: Mayor Barbara Pataraon, CouncIImambars J. Oiann Qoettan,Gabrial Jabbour, and Edward Callahan. Mary Butlar was abaant. Tha following rapraaantad tha City ataff: City Adminlstrator Ron Mooraa, Pub IIc Worka Diractor John Garhardaon, FInanca Oiractor Tom Kuahn, Building & Zoning Adminlatrator Jaanna Mabuath, Aaaiatant Planning and Zoning Adminiatrator Michaal Qaffron, City Attorney Kavin Staunton, City Enginaar QIann Cook, Chiaf of Polica Staphan Sullivan, and City Racordar Tari Naab. Staphan Pataraon waa praaant to raprasant tha Planning Commiasion. Mayor Pataraon cal lad tha maating to ordar at 7:03 P.M. PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING FOR LEAF STREET RESIDENTS - 7:03 - 8:12 P.M. Cook axplainad that undar tha currant propoaal, Laaf Straat will ba raatorad at a width of 22’. He atatad thay ara invaatigating whathar tha straat should ba raconatructad to MSA atandarda at a 26* width with concrata curb and guttar and atorm aawar. Ha raviawad tha araas most impactad by tha additional width of tha roadway. Ha notad undar tha proposal to usa MSA funds, tha roadway would ba postad at 30 m.p.h., which is what it currantiy Is posted for but it currantiy does not meat tha design atandarda for such a spaad. Ha addad thara would ba an approximata raduction of $100,000 on tha aawar projact, but tha curb, guttar and atorm aawar would add approx imataiy $70,000 to tha projact coat and would ba funded through MSA. Qoettan asked about raplacamant of trees. Cook axplainad that MSA funds could ba used to replace an equal number of trees that ara removed with tha construction of tha road. Jabbour asked about tha size of tha existing road. Cook stated tha currant roadway is 22* with 2* shoulders on each side, with an overall roadway of 26*. Tha MSA road would ba 28* wide, 1* additional for tha curbing, and 3* of flat harmed area beyond each curb which will ba grassed, for a total of 35*. Jabbour asked if a variance would ba required to replace tha road in kind. Cook said thay typically replace a straat in kind during a projact such as this without variance approval. 1 NINUTE8 OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD AUGUST 10, 1992 «v W LEAF STREET - CONT.Mayor Patarson askad If tha road would ba I aval ad out.Cook axpialnad how cartain araaa would ba flllad and othars would ba cut back to maka a mora I aval road with tha MSA propoaad road. Ha addad, with tha currant proposal tha road would not ba I aval ad out at all.Jabbour askad about tha cost savings to tha rasidants If tha road Is constructsd with MSA funds. Moorsa axpialnad that tha sawar projact cost to tha City would ba raducad If tha road was const ructsd with MSA funds, but only bacausa monay will ba usad from anothar sourca. Ha statad tha City has a list of projacts thay can usa tha MSA funds on. Jabbour askad if only tha trunk was to ba providad to this araa, ha undarstood tha raduction in cost would hava gona to tha City to assist in tha trunk chargas. Moorsa axpialnad that If only tha trunk wars to ba installad, thay would not hava dona tha ant Ira straat and tharafora MSA funds could not ba usad. Jana Bahrman, 340 Laaf Straat, askad to hava tha width clarifiad. Cook axpialnad that from curb-to-curb tha width will ba 29*, from back'to^back it will ba 29* wlda. Thara will ba an additional 3* on aithar si da of tha curb to add support to tha curb which will ba grassad. Bahrman askad if thay will ba abla to plant up to tha curb. Cook said thay can legally plant to within 2’ of tha curb, howavar, tha City would prafar to saa plantings sat back further to allow for additional area for whan tha plantings mature. Henry F'lrchnar, 390 Laaf Straat. askad about tha plantings on his property. Cook said that tha vegetation would hava to ba sat back at least 2* from tha curb, but Public Works may wish to hava tha plantings sat back further to avoid damage to those plantings. Tass MIhkama, 3200 Baysida Road, askad why tha Council considering using MSA funds for this road. was MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 10. 1992 LEAF STREET - CONT. Jabbour statad that tha City is trying to find tha bast way to fund tha ro<id apiacamant. Qoattan ciarifiad that not ail strsats can ba upgradad with MSA funds. Cook notad tha City has a schadula of projacts and it is datarminad by tha Public Works Oapartmant as -to how thay would Mka to maintain thosa strac*^s. Minkama askad if at soma point in tha futura Laaf Straat would naad to ba upgradad to a standard width. Callahan notad that Laaf Straat would naad to ba upgradad in dua course, however, there is not a rigid date for that upgrade. Jabbour askad if tha City allows tha straat to ba reconstructed at a sutstandard design, if they are in any way liable for potential accidents caused by tha substandard design. Staunton statad tha daUsior fc ' tha City to allow tha straat to ba upgradad under variat ca approval is strictly a City policy. Ha said the City is entitled to variance approval Just as anyone alsa is entitled, as long as it can prove a hardship. Jabbour fait they should not ignore tha process Mfnkama askad at what point she would know if tha hedge along her property would ba raaioval. Cook said ha has racommandad that tha hedge ba placed further back because it is too close to tha road in its present position. Qarhardson notad that they are using trench boxes where aver necessary to save existing vegetation. Callahan cl-rifled that tha hedge on tha Minkama property will not ba affected In any different or greater degree than by tha sewer instaiI at ion. Cook notad tha haoga will not ba destroyed if moved back, which is what ha is proposing In either prop^aal. Ha said tha City would ba responsible for moving the hedge back and paying for that move. '1^ • i 1 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 10, 1992 r' J.. T r-. k i h LEAF STREET - CONT. Don Oronborg, 110 Loaf Straat, said tha additional width of tha road will ancroach his building pad. Ha said his Cartificata of Tit la for tha proparty goas to tha adga of tha road. Qarhardaon atatad ha would chack into that issua. Cook clarlfiad that tha City only has tha right to control tha araa to tha back of tha curb. Pat Crana, 286 Laaf Straat, clarlfiad that MSA funds would pay for rapiacamant of plantings, but thara would not ba monay aval labia from tha sawar projact itsatf. Cook atatad that was corract. Ha addad that with tha sawar projact, rapiacamant of traas would only ba on tha easamants, not along tha roadway. Ha atatad MSA funding allows for rapiacamant of two traas for avary ona ramovad. Tha traas would ba aithar 8* pinas, or 2- 3" In diamatar daciduoua traas. Carl Rhama, 3245 Watartown Road, askad if tha MSA fun>.i would allow for rapiacamant of tha pina traas ha will 'osa. Cook said that was corract and addad that thay would prafar to raplant tha traas furthar back onto tha proparty. Brian Chalt, 140 Laaf Straat, said tha incraasa road width would impact his sr^araly staap drivaway. Ha askad if MSA funds could ba usad to grada his driva araa. Cook said thay could adjust tha grada of tha road in that araa to lass impact tha driva, and with tha approval of tha homaownar, could adjust tha grada on tha proparty. Gronbarg said ha has no objactlon to raducing tha crast of tha road in that araa an additional Miount to dacraasa tha impact on tha Ehait proparty. Cola Graham, 95 Laaf Straat, askad if traas impactad by tha projact dia at a latar data, if tha City would rapiaca thosa also. Cook said thay would naad to maka tha dads ion on tha haalth of tha ramaining axisting traas at tha tima of tha projact installation. Graham clarlfiad that the speed limit for tha axisting roadway is In violation of tha ordinances. Ha askad why tha spaad limit hasn’t baan raducad. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 10. 1992 LEAF STREET - CONT. Go«tt«n atk«d if h« has raquastad tha Police Department to police the street for violators of the speed limit. Graham noted the Police artment doee monitor the area, but tney are not there in the morning when most of the problem occurs. He said he resented Ms. Butter’s remark at the last meeting. Mhen she said that the people going too fast on the road probably live there. He felt it is not the people that live there that are speeding* but rather those taking a short cut to other areas. Qoetten indicates' the street may actually be safer for pedestrians if the street is widened. Jabbour felt there is not necessarily security in policing the situation. He stated that Hs. Butler did not mean that the residents of the area were speeding, and he stated that Butler is very concerned with Issues of safety. Graham stated he is opposed to curb, gutter and storm sewer. He indicated If that is the way of life they wished they would have moved to another suburb. Callahan reported that if the State Highway Department is asked to reconsider a epeed limit for a road, they will monitor existing speeds and generally change the speed limit to what the majority of travelers are going. Graham asked If the existing road conditions are unsafe, why the City doee not reduce the epeed limit. Cook stated the City has no control over reducing the speed limit, that would be the responsibility of the State Highway Department. Graham asked where the money that would be saved from the project would go if the street were reconstructed with MSA funds. He felt the general area would not realize the benefit of the wider road. Mayor Peterson said the money would benefit all City paying a portion of the project. reeldents in the CIcI Graham, 95 Leaf Street, stai d her opposition to the reconstruction of Leaf Street with MSA funds. She said the quality of life in Orono cannot be replaced. Behrman reminded the Council of a petition submitted from the residents in the area in opposition to the widening of the road. 1 MINUTES OF THE RFIULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD august 10, 1992 LEAF STREET - CONT. Cran« aubmlttad • pat It ion of raaidants Mho agraa to a 28* wida road If 70* of tha banafit la raalliad by thoaa paying for tha raconatruction of tha road. Jabbour aakad Mhich patition tha Council ahould conaide^r. Crana fait tha iatar patition aubmittad ahould control. Gronbarg aakad about additional hardcovar from tha widanad roadMay. Minkama Indicatad aha fait a changa In phlloaophy on tha part of tha Council with ragarda to this iaaua and hopad this did not Indicata a trand. Qoattan notad thay ara vary conctrnad about tha anvironmant and hopa to kaap tha araa as rural aa posaibla, but alao hava to ba aMara and conaldar futura groMth and aafaty concarna. Sahrman clarlflad that tha raaidants that signad tha patition aha aubmittad ara oppoaad to tha roadMay conatructad to MSA atandarda, hOMavar, It tha Council dacidaa to do ao, thay Mould Ilka to raallza tha financial banafit. Furchnar fait that aafaty on tha roadMay Is not a major Iaaua. Rhama statad hi a opposition to tha Mldanlng of tha road. Mayor Patarson notad that tha Council Mould vota on this isaua at tha August 24, 1992 Council masting and said tha raaidants mould ba not if lad of this masting. Tha Council racasaad from 8:15 to 8:30 p.m. VISITOR PRESENTATION Mayor Patarson introducad Saso Tapina frpm Slovanla. Sha axpialnad ha has coma hara to visit hi a pan pal, Mr. Aaron Printup. Sha pfssantad Saao Mith a pan and a cantannlai book from Orono. (•1) CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Patarson ramovad I tarn #2. It Mas movad by Qoattan, aacondad by Callahan, Consant Aganda as amandad. Ayaa 4, nays 0. to approva tha 8 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD AUGUST 10, 1992 1 .:-k \ CONSENT AGENDA - CONT.Motions for all I tarns adoptad by consent agenda will be included in the minutes in their respective numerical order.(•2) APPROVAL OF MINUTES This item was not acted on. PUBLIC COMMENTS Bill Ringer, 3282 North Shore Drive, explained he has rented the property for many years, and now the ONR has purchased the property and he has received an eviction notice. He asked for the Council's help in fighting against the installation of the boat launch in this area. Jabbour explained that the City is working hard with the DNR to prevent the boat launch, but added the City does not really have the power to prevent the launch. He understood that the ONR was not ready to continue with their plans for the launch. Moorse suggested that perhaps the ONR has decided to discontinue the rental of the property, but with no future plans for the property. He said he would contact the ONR to find out the status of their plans and report back to Mr. Ringer. (#3) #1746 THOMAS A MARGARET LOWE, 2630 WEST LAFAYETTE ROAD - VARIANCE Mr. Lowe was present. Mebusth explained that the applicants propose a 21x26* addition in the 0~76* zone to their existing residence. She noted that in an attempt to minimize the impact, the applicants propose the removal of 740 s.f. of non-structural hardcover in the 0-75* area, and also the relocation of a shed at 176 s.f. from the 0-75* zone to the 75- 250' zone. The Planning Commission was asked to consider reductions in the 75-250* area to help minimize the impact of the addition. She referred to a previous application where the majority of the home was located in the 0-75* zone and approval was granted for an addition in the 0-75* zone. Goetten stated that each application should be reviewed on Its own merits. Habusth advised that the applicant had asked to have this specific request considered by Council. Habusth noted the existing residence does not lend itself to vertical expansion. Jt,-! m •5 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 10, 1992 ZONING FILE 91746 - CONT. Low* •xplalnod that whan tha housa was built in 1972, tha City did not hava tha hardcovar ordinanca in placa, tharafora, tha ant Ira structura was allowad to ba built in tha 0-75* zona. Ha addad tha tannis court is not a hard surfaca and drains diractly down. Ha statad tha vacant adjacant lot, which ha owns, sarvas as a holding pond for run-off from his proparty. Ha said tha vacant lot is not likaly to ba built on In tha naar futura, but ha prafars not to coinbina tha proparties as ha has paid taxes on a buildabla lot and has paid the sowar and water assessments for that lot. Mabusth statad that If the vacant lot ware to b* built on, the tannis court would hava to ba removed in order to provide an adequate building pad. She said a variance wojld ba necessary to build on tha lot without removal of tha tannis court. Low* said ha would be willing to put a deed restriction on the vacant lot requiring tha tannis court to ba removed prior to building on tha vacant lot or upon sal* of either lot. Jabbour indicated tha affect would ba Joining tha two lots without actually combining tha lots. Callahan felt they should act on the proposal before them, or refer tha appi icat ion back to tha Piann'ng Commission for further review. Lowe statad tha Planning Commission raquastad him to coma up with other options, which ha has dona. Stephan Paterson Indicated tha application did not address several issues whan tha Planning Commission reviewed tha application. Goat tan fait tha hardship for this property is unique as tha entire housa is located within tha 0-75* zona. She felt that tha applicant has gone over and above what normally is required. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Paterson, to approve Application 91746 for Thomas and Margaret Lowa^ 2630 West Lafayette Road, for hardcovar variances to construct an addition to tha existing residance, conditioned upon tha removal of non-structurai hardcovar In the 0-75’ zona, to relocate the shad from tha 0-75’ zona to the 75-250* zona, and for the City to prepare a Dead Covenant to ba signed by tha property owners requiring tha removal of tha tannis court at the time the vacant land is sold or proposed to ba built upon. Ayes 3, nays 1. Callahan voted nay. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 10, 1992 ZONING FILE 91740 - CONT. Callahan clarlflad that it is the fasting of tha Council that It is alright for paopla to violata tha hardcovar ordinanca, as long as thay promisa to giva it up whan thay dia or sail tha proparty. Jabbour fait thay wars improving tha situation by ansuring that tha tannis court would ba ramovad at soma point. Callahan fait thay wars accapting a bad policy. Qoattan askad If thay wars legally satting a pracadant. Callahan statad thay wars satting a bad pracadant. Lows addad that ha is giving a 1*»> acra pares I of land in axchanga for 500 s.f. of additional structural hardcovar. (994) 9174S BOB HOVLANO, 1246 NORTH ARM DRIVE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT > REQUEST TO BE REFERRED BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION It was movad by Qoattan, sacondad by Cal lahan, to rafar AppI i cat I on 91746 for Bob Hovland, 1245 North Arm Oriva, back to tha Planning Commission for additional raviaw. Ayas 4, nays 0. (96) 91749 JAMES F. LAWRENCE, 1660 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH • PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION “ RESOLUTION 9314B Mrs. Lawranca was prasant. Mabusth axplainad this is a two lot subdivision, which maata al i raquirad standards. Sha axplainad tha only Issua is tha guast housa, which was navar grantad a conditional usa parmit. Tha ownars hava agraad to flla a conditional usa parmit application to ba ravlawad at tha naxt Planning Commission masting. It was movad by Qoattan, sacondad by Jabbour, to adopt Rasoiutlon 93146 for Application 91749 Jamas F. Lawranca, 1550 Sixth Avanua North, for preliminary subdivision. Ayas 4, nays 0. i A MiiMl H ? ■ MINUTES OF THE RECMILAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 10. 1992 (•e) »1752 GEORGE W. KALWEIT. 4295 FOREST LAKE DRIVE > REQUEST FOR REFUND OF DOUBLE FEE Mabutth •xplain«d that this issua was not addrssssd at tha last masting as the Item was placed on tha consent agenda. Qoattan fait they should not automatically place zoning items on the consent agenda. She felt the double fee is not applicable In this situation. She was told the Kalweits had requested their builder to get a permit and he did not. It was moved by Goetten. seconded by Mayor Peterson, to waive the double fee for Application S1752 for George W. Kalweit. 4255 Forest Lake Drive. Ayes 4, nays 0. Callahan asked staff to research the possibility of adopting an ordinance requiring the builder to pay the double fee if the necessary permits are not obtained. (•7) 91753 SKIP MADGE. 875 FOREST ARMS LANE - VARIANCES Skip Madge was present for this application. Mabusth explained that an area of newly installed landscape area underlain with plastic is located within the 0-75* zone, which tha applicant has agreed to reeiove. In that aaie# area there la a puaiphouse. 3x4’ and 3* high. This was installed by the previous owner. A lock box, which was located in the area, has been reinstalled on the concrete under the deck near the house. She continued, a shed within the 75-250* is located partially within a 20* utility easement. There is not a record of a permit for this structure. The proposed pool is to be located in the 75-250* zone. The house is approximately 275* from the channel. Total hardcover within the 75-250* zone will be approximately lOS. The majority of hardcover is within the 250-500* zone, at 42*4*. Total hardcover within the 75-500* setback zone is proposed at 25.3S. Mabusth stated a major reason why the denial opinion voted against this application at the Planning Commission meeting was that the drainage improvements have not been inatal led along the property line. The M.C.W.D. has just recently approved the permit for the drainage improvements. Jabbour asked about the cement slab by the driveway. Mabusth stated that the City does not issue permits for such improvements. If:-'.lea MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD AUGUST 10, 1992ZONING FILE 91753 -* CONT.Go«tt«n f*lt th«y should havs a survsy including all Improvamants.Staphtn Pstsrson raportsd that tha front of tha drainaga ditch Is concratad down past tha housa. Tha davalopmant was dona in a way that craatad a watar problam batwaan tha Madga and Carlson propart las. Mabusth statad tha ramaindar of tha dralnagaway will ba installad as a swala with rip rap. It was fait by tha City at tha tima of approval of tha drainagaway, that It would not ba fair to cradit tha two propart las with additional hardcovar for tha swala as this issua should hava baan addrassad with tha original davalopmant by tha davatopar. Sha notad tha application involves a variance to tha avaraga lakarhora setback for five structures. Jabbour said tha intent of tha average setback ordinance Is to reduce somaona from blocking another's views. Madge statad tha concrete slab near tha driveway was in place at tha tima tha survey was dona for tha drainagaway. Arnold Carlson, 855 Forest Arms Lana, statad there ware two utility aasamants taken at tha tima his real dance was built, but ha statad there Is no public need for tha aasamant and in tha lakashora yards. It was moved by Goattan, seconded by Mayor Paterson, to approve avaraga lakashora setback variances for Application #1753 for Skip Madga of 879 Forest Arms Lana, subject to conditions sat forth in tha memo from staff dated 7/14/92. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#8) BIG ISLAND, INC. > JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE - RESOLUTION #3149 It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution •3149 for Big Island, Inc., for a joint use dock license. Ayes 4, nays 0. (•9) STYROFOAM DOCK FLOTATION ORDINANCE Gaffron referred to tha adopted ordinance in its final forsiat. Ha notad tha ordinance did not provide for interim or clean up measures. Jabbour statad ha liked tha ordinance In its present form. Ha fait centainmant is a major issua. _.. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD AUGUST 10, 1992STYROFOAM DOCK FLOTATION ORDINANCE - CONT.Mayor Patarson thankad Callahan and Jabbour for all thalr work on tha ordinanca.It Mas fflovad by Callahan, sacondad by Jabbour, to diract Orono’s LMCD rapraaantatIva to urpa tha LMCD to adopt an ordinanca with a 2 1/2 yaar daadlina for ramoval of all styrofoam. Ayas 4, nays 0.Goattan clarlflad that har vota Includad approval of tha ordinanca and notad tha raason sha votad against tha adoption of tha ordinanca at tha last masting mss bacausa tha Council had just racaivad tha radraft of tha ordinanca that avaning and sha fait sha did not hava tima to ravlaw It propariy. (#10) 8H0RELAND ORDINANCES UPDATE Saffron raportad that tha citias of MInnatrista ana Woodland hava mada a prasantatlon bafora tha Tachnical Committaa. Tha City of Spring Park has raquastad savara flaxlbillty to tha ordinanca, and suggastad thay ba givan considarat Ion bacausa of tha fact thay hava multi-housing and commareial opportunitlas that surrounding cl11 as do not hava. Jabbour axprassad his gratituda to Saffron for tha axcallant job ha is doing for tha City. NAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Jabbour raportad that Mayor SMartMOod cal lad him that avaning, and aha askad about tha Orono's CouncI I *s parformanca. Ha told har that thay hava fallad misarably trying to gat Issuaa in a battar situation. Mayor SMartwood axptainad to him raaaons bahind thalr budgat cuts. Ha told har Orono naads 100X control ovar tha futura of Mhat happans in Orono. Mayor Patarson notad that during a convarsation Mith a Long Laka Counci Isiambar, sha told him that tha majority opinion naads to ba officialiy actad upon during a masting prior to raporting to Orono. Jabbour statad tha issua of firs safaty is a continuation from tha past and notad tha first task assignad to Moorsa mss to avaluata fira contracts for tha City. Moorsa statad Long Laka is putting togathar a proposal to ba submittad to Orono this waak. H1NUTE8 OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL NEETING HELD AUGUST 10, 1992 HAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. Callahan said tha matting with tha Hound, Wayzata, and NapI a Plain Fire Chiafs provad to ba an imprassiva prasantation of thair abilitiaa. Ha addad that tha coat of uaing tha Long Laka FIra Oapartmant for protaction is lOOX or mora ovar tha coat of comparabia aarvlca. Ha fait tha mattar of tha raaponaa tima may ba a factor in tha additional coat, but fait tha coat of tha running tha Fira Oapartmant ahould not ba doubt a. Jabbour atatad thay ahould dafar thair dacialon aa a courtaay to Long Laka until aftar thay submit thair proposal. Noorsa raportad that Long Laka aakad to ba abla to prasant thair proposal diractly to tha Cocricil. It was moved by Mayor Pecarson, seconded by Callahan, to have Long Laka prasant thair proposal to tha Council on Tuesday, August 18, 1992 at 3:30 at a special Council meeting prior to tha budget meeting. Ayes 4, nays 0. (•12) RICHARD HA88EL APPLICATION FOR BEAVER TRAPPING PERMIT Mooraa axpiainad this request was tabled at tha last meeting because tha Council had a number of questions. Mrs. Hassat stated tha davaiopar has 110 acres and there are 10 hosias In tha development. She noted that at the time of the development, Orono required three culverts lu be Installed under the road to defer water off the property. This has provided an excellent area for the beavers to set up their homes. She stated that In the past several years, they have had to drain tile around their property and repaint their house several tiaies because of tha water damage Incurred because of tha beavers on tha property. She noted when thay called tha DNR for help, tha DNR suggested shooting tha beavers. She noted whan thay applied for the permit with the Orono Police Department, thay ware told tha permit would taka approximately 6 days, and thay applied for tha permit In June. Hassel estimated that there are ovar 100 beavers on tha property. Jabbour felt tha Council does not have tha authority to prevent trapping, but thay ask that it ba dona in a humane method. Qoattan noted thay have never had a request to trap aa many as 20 beavers. Hassel stated thay have incurred ovar $16,000 to data In damages caused by tha beavers. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 10, 1992 RICHARD HASSEL’S APPLICATION FOR A BEAVER TRAPPING PERMIT - CONT. Jabbour felt the beavers have caused the Hassels an undue hardship. Hassel noted they also have lost approximately 48 trees. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve a limited leghold trap permit for Richard A. Hassel of 870 Hunt Farm Road. Ayes 3, nays 1. Goetten voted nay. Goetten felt the appiI cants have a legitimate concern, but Is st i I I against leghold traps. Mayor Peterson Informed Mrit. Hassel that the DNR permit has expired and that permit will need to be renewed prior to commencing with the process. (#13) EURASION WATER MILFOIL GRANT APPLICATION - RESOLUTION #3150 Moorse explained that David Sawyer of the Long Lake Council Is proceeding with an application for a grant to fund milfoil eradication. Sawyer has suggested that Orono join In with the application process as they may have a better chance to obtain the funding. Sullivan noted that milfoil has been sighted at several locations on the lake and they hope to proceed with control measures early enough to entirely eradicate milfoil from the lake. Jabbour said he disagrees with chemical treatments. Moorse said they will need to work with Long Lake on the type of control efforts used. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3150 approving the Joint eurasion water milfoil grant application with the City of Long Lake. Ayes 4, nays 0. (§14) CITY CLEAN-UP A YARDWASTE - REGULATION RECOMMENDATIONS Moorse explained that this recommendation Is for the yard waste program as that will begin soon, and staff wilt follow with a recommendation ^or the clean up. Jabbour feM they should recover their costs through the clean-uo program rather than the yardwaste program. -t MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 10, 1992 CITY CLEAN-UP & YARDWASTE - CONT. Moorse noted that the biggest problem is the large amount of brush coliected. Gerhardson noted that the City does receive some subsidy from Hennepin County for the leaves and grass collection. He added the brush disposal is costing the City the most. Callahan noted this proposal inserts the need for a cash register on site during coiiection. He suggested an additional amount be added to the utility billing for all residents. Jabbour suggested a coupon book. Gerhardson noted they will submit additionai recommendations for the upcoming year. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve the proposed recommendations for fees to bt charged for users of the yardwaste program, with the exclusion of <’ees for leaves and grass, and to approve the yardwaste program schedule. Ayes 4, nays 0. («#15) BID AWARD STUBBS BAY SEWER IMPROVEMENT BONDS - RESOLUTION #3151 It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Resolution •3151 awarding the sale of $2,000,000 General Obligation Sewer Improvement Bonds, Series 1992, fixing the form and specifications thereof, providing for their execution and delivery, and providing for their payment. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#16) CITY ASSESSOR’S CONTRACT RENEWAL Moorse explained that the City Assessor Is asking for a 3.3X increase. Callahan felt that 2% was too much of an increase. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve the contract renewal for the City Assessor as proposed. Ayes 2, nays 2. Callahan and Jabbour voted nay. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded Miiyor Peterson, to approve the contract renewal for the City Assessor, with an $69,800. Jabbour withdrew his motion. increase to I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 10, 1992 CITY ASSESSOR’S CONTRACT RENEWAL - CONT. It was moved by Callahan, contract renewal for the $70,000. Ayes 4, nays 0. seconded by Jabbour, to approve the City Assessor, with an increase to Callahan noted that the contract runs from September 1st and should be approved prior to the contract expiration date. («4I17) APPOINTMENT OF ELECTION JUDGES FOR STATE PRIMARY - RESOLUTION #3152 It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Resolution #3152 appointing election Judges for the primary election to be held September 15, 1992. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*#18) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT #4 - RESOLUTION #3153 It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Resolution #3153 approving Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 4. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#19) ESTABLISHMENT OF WORK SESSION FOR THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR PERFORMANCE REVIEW Moorse said he has contacted Jim Brimeyer to facilitate with the rev Iew. Jabbour felt It was not necessary to invite Brimeyer to the review session. Staunton stated under the Open Meeting Law, the review session does not have to be an open meeting, but the results would noed to be pub Iished. A Performance Review session was established for Thursday, September 10, 1992 at 3:30 p.m. (#20) ESTABLISH INTEREST RATE ON STUBBS BAY SEWER ASSESSMENT ROLL > RESOLUTION #3154 It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution •3154 amending the interest rate applied to the Stubbs Bay sanitary sewer assessment roll, as established by Resolutions #3145 and #3121, and to establish the interest rate at 6.5X. Ayes 4, neys 0. MINUTES OF THE FEGUl AR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AU..UST 10, 1992 (#21) INDIVIDUAL SEWER UNIT DETERMINATIONS - STUBBS BAY RESOLUTIONS #3155 TO #3171 It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolutions #3155 to #3171 determining individual sewer unit determlnatIons. Ayes 4, nays 0. Gaffron noted there wl I ! be an additional four resolutions determining sewer units for four othe; properties presented to the Council at a later date for ado-iion. Moorse explained that Terry Humberf has called to set up the first facllltative meeting on the Highway 12 Issue. August 20, 1992 was established as the first facllltative meeting. «4C«« Mcorse stated the meeting with Jack Boarman and John Davies had been postponed. It was rescheduled to Friday, August 14, 1992 at 11:00 a.m. to be held at Callahan’s -‘♦♦ice. (#22) LICENSES It was moved by Jabbour, following Iicenses: seconded by Butler, to approve the SeptIc System Installer License - Clover Hill Co., Inc. Coppin Plumbing Firearm Use Permit - Park Gun Club Ayes 4, nays 0. («#23) BILLS It was fiiovad by Goattaiif sscondad by Cal laharit to approv# paywant of the All Funds Account. Ayes 4, nays 0. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by regular C'ono City Council meeting at Session. Ayes 4, nays 0. Goetten, to adjourn the 10:3® p.m. to Executive Barbara Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hellln, City tleira To:Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator From:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:April 15, 1992 Subject: 11730 Greg Malik, 3060 Sixth Avenue North Final Subdivision - Resolution * iViLliB i HI• ••■ik•u List of Exhibits A - Preliminary Subdivision Resolution (3120) B - Weckman Memo 4/14/92 C - Septic Site Plan D - Final Plat E - Final Resolution AUG 2 4 1992 CITYOFORONO At the time of preliminary plat approval, it was the belief of the septic staff that proposed shared drive along the cast lot line would encroach upon the existing septic system that serves the residence in Lot 2. Since that time, the applicant has installed the shared drive along the east lot line and the septic staff has confirmed the septic system is approximately 6* from the traveled road. The septic system still remains non- conforming based on the substandard setback from the traveled road (required « existing « 6') and based on Heckman's report of April 14, 1992, existing system has a high potential for future failure. Current septic testing calls for mound systems on all septic sites tested for this property. It is apparent that the required 3* separation could not be met by the trench system existing on the property. Per Section 12.30, Subd. 8 (B) (4), the system has been found to be non-conforming and must be replaced within one year of the date of final plat approval. The septic files will be appropriately flagged and the current and future owners notified within the resolution * ,5roving the final plat. Per the County's driveway permit, only one access to the site will be allowed. The new driveway ha been cordoned off. The existing drive will be used during the construction of the new residence on Lot 1. The City has a Developer's Agreement and appropriate form of security to ensure removal of the gravel drive and the restoration of ground cover within Lot 2. Mr. Malik has completed all conditions of preliminary subdivision approval. Staff recommends approval of the final plat, Leslie Addition, subject to the findings and conditions set forth in the enclosed approval resolution. Isv o m CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3120 A RESOLOTIOII GRANTING preliminary approval of a 2-LOT PLAT LOCATED AT 3060 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH FILE NO. 1730 WHEREAS. Grea Malik (hereinafter "the applicant") on March 30^ ............................ Refer to Exhibit A, (hereinafter "the property"): and WHEREAS, aft-r due oubiished and mailed notice in accordance witr Minnesota Starues 46 2.3 58 et. ^eq. mrr-nission held a public hearing on Subdivision Codes, the Orono •icons”desi^ino to be heard concernincAotil 20, 1992 it which time all persons = this application were piven the opportunity to s?ea)c the.e , WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on M®y la\\:^^®notinc City council considered the subdivision application of Greg Malik, notin. the following findings of fact: 1 The oroperty is located within the PR-13 Single Residlntial^zoning District requiring a minimum of 2 acres of conti "ous dry buildable land within f/fo^-es and Tslproperty contains a total of approximately 6.04 ac.es an ac2T©s is Q0si?^n2iwSci w©tla.nd a.r0©« 5 The proposed plat contains two lots each meeting the re.iU..ed twc acrel of dry Contiguous area wit.hin each lot as follows: Lot 1 - 2.84 acres Lot 2 “ 2.00 acres ^ • iTclltl or,"’=:^V^"u!-b ”cCrfor;r| serve as a single access to both residential lots. a report by S. Wectoian dated April 14. 1992. Pace 1 of 4 CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3120 _ NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the oreliminary plat application of Greg Malik for the property located at 5 o60 lixth AveLe North per survey dated April 7, 1992 by Mark S._ Gronber, of Coffin and Gronberg, Inc., subject to the following conditions. 1. Applicant shall retain residence structure and accessory structure on Lot 2. The existing septic system that serves residence shall be abandoned at the time of shared drive construction. Applicant shall install a conforming septic system on Lot 2 within 6 months of the date the Certificate of Occupancy is issued for new residence on Lot 1. 2. Applicant shall be allowed to use the existing driveway that serves residence on Lot 2 during the construction of the new residence on Lot 1. Upon the issuance of a temporary Certificate of Occupancy for new residence on Lot 1, applicant si^ 11 have 10 days to install shared drive within Outlot A and abandon existing septic system. Applicant is ^^ drive as close '-o the western boundaries of Outlot A in order to minimize impact of shared drive upon existing residential development along east lot line. The existing drive serving residence »n Lot 2 shall be removed and ground cover restored at the time the shared drive is installed. 3. At the time of final plat approval Developer's Agreement and a Letter of Credit in - the following improvements are completed: a. Installation of shared drive within Outlot A and the abandonment of existing septic system chat serves existing residence on Lot 2. b. Existing drive that serves residence on Lot 2 to be removed and ground cover restored. c. Installation of new septic system to serve residence on Lot 2. Page 2 of 4 CITY of ORONO RESOLU i lON OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3120 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTALS The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zonxn^. Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting oi the second and fourth Mondays of the month: 1. RECORD PLAT drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1} copy reduced tc 1"=200'. Drawing to induce:4 a.Lot lines platted per preliminary survey. b.Dedication of drainage easements over designated wetland i; northwest portion of Lot 1. c.Dedication of 40' of right-of-way for County Road 6. c.Dedication of drainage and utility easements 10' wid^^ all perimeter property lines anc 5 ' iperty lines except omit at designated wetland a^ea.prope 2. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required: a.Title opinion addressed to the City. r ”'^herei- holders or others with property interest indicawe<a shall sign the plat and all other documents af^ec^ed bj such interest. b.The applicant must provide certified copies of all recordec easements currently affecring the property. c.Signed and executed Flowage & Conservation Easement designated wetland (refer to sample enclosed). Legal description can be written as follows: Shown as drainage easements on the Plat, ( cl at name ), Hennepin County# Minnesota. d Sicned and executed Developer's Agreement Izldit for the completion of the required improvements. Samples have been enclosed for your review and execution. 3. FEES TO BE PAID:Total Due $275.00* a.Final plat fee - $175.00 Page 3 of 4 CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO..3120 b. Legal review and filing fees “ $200.00 c. Park Dedication Fee*" The Park Commission shall 5®V®''* o? cA‘ no interest in acquiring lands, the City will ask for a cash payment in lieu of land. At that point t.*e properwy will -- referred to the City Assessor to determine undevelooed land. The Park Dedication Fee would be based on the value of 8% of the undeveloped land. Please contact John Gerhardson (473-7357) for information pertaining ^o the scheduling of your application before Park fees must be paid at the time of the filing of the final plat. Applicant is hereby advised that preliminary shall expire in one year from the date o^. Council s pp preliminary plat (.May 11, 1993). Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 11th day of May, 1992. ATT3 .T: Bar ’.»ara A. Peterson, Mayor '-YTi. allin. City Clerk STATE OF MnNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF ___ FINAI& OFFICE 13502000W 01 CEH J236M 1350200C00 01 GEff J75,0> rOlUL *0 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged b^ifore me day of May, 1992, Barbara A. Peterson 4 Dorothy M. iallin, ay Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. . — _ _ — .D 11 H 1 i in JAMIE L eOSMA KOTWV Pt;8tlCMlV*l£S0TA hlsnwn county MyCorom Notary Puo Page 4 of 4 CITYof ORONO «»HO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3120 EXHIBIT A Exist 1no bOUCnwcsw quaruet ujUDuc-nu /->u.uw ^ w... ..w*. west corner thereof; thenco south parallel with the west line of said Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter the centerline of County Road No. 6; thence easterly alot.y said centerline to the v»est line of the East 208.00 feet o said Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter; thence north on said west line to the south line of the >lorth 648 feet of said Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter; ¥• Vh M al/^nrr 1 l_nd tlQ tli^0 0AStl LXH6I tl^O feet of said Norchwest quarter o: cne boutnwesL quarter; t.hencc west along said south line to the east line of the West 102... 70 feet of said Northwest quarter of the South- “ - rtcr; thence north along said east line to the nort said Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter; cst along said north line to the point of beginning th Pi -•--I £ To: Prom: Date: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager April 14, 1992 T- Subject: Subdivision #1730, Gregg D. Malik - Septic Review I have reviewed the existing and proposed septic system information for this property and would make the following comments. LOT 1 Soil testing and design has been completed for a five bedroom home. Both primary and alternate drainfield sites are mounds and meet all setbacks. The alternate mound site, however, is on a 7% slope which requies a variance from the septic code and an interceptor drain is recommended to divert up-slope drainage. The soil testing and system design have been approved for both sites. LOT 2 The existing septic system consists of two septic tanks with unknown volume and a small drainfield also of unkno%m size. The septic system was inspected on April 13, 1992 with the septic report indicating that the drainfield was saturated and discharging slightly tc the surface and the septic tanks required pumping. The system is not considered to be failing at this time, however it has a high potential for future failure. Soil testing and septic design have been completed for this lot indicating primary and alternate drainfield sites for a new five bedroom residence. Both septic sites for Lot 2 have be*an conditionally approved if the two existing wells in this parcel are abandoned. An old well currently not in uc-a must be properly abandoned now and the well serving the existing residence must be abandoned prior to the issuance of a building permit. Access to Lot 1 via Out lot A encroaches over a large portion of the existing drainfield. When the access road is constructed through Outlot A, the existing septic system must be abandoned. The existing residence may be occupied if soil testing is approved indicatir.j *_wo avail ble septic sites for the existing residence. SUMMARY Based on the above informatic. , I would recommend approval of the proposed subdivision provi-ed that the existing septic system in Lot 2 be abandoned when the access road Outlot A is constructed and that both existing wells in Lot 2 be abandoned prior to the issuance of a building permit for Lot 2. system lowing a five :es are 5wever, c code -slope jproved cs with t. The septic »d and squired t this >r this a new e been parcel operly nust be >ortion :ructed doned. Lng is cisting proval septic It i\ is ndoned fe1/ A RESOLDTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF LESLIE ADDITION APPLICATION NO. 1730 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision application of a 2 lot plat by Gregory D. Malik (hereinafter "the subdivider"); WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all standards of the RR-IB rural residential zoning district finding that each lot is of a size and configuration that will allow its development for single family residential use without the need of any variances; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including; 1.Completion of all the requirements of Resolution No. 3120, the resolution granting preliminary approval of the two lot plat. 2. Dedication on the plat of right-of-way for a public road shown as Sixth Avenue North. 3. 4. Dedication on the plat of drainage and utility easements. Granting of a bike easement over the southerly 10 feet of Lot 2, Block 1 and Outlet A. 5.Dedication to the City of a flowage and conservation easement providing for limitations on the use of a wetland described therein and shown on the plat as d linage easements. Page 1 of 3 I 6. Execution of a Developer's Agreement providing for certain improvements as a condition of subdivision approval and the posting of appropriate security to 'nsure the completion of the improvements. -Tr Payment i o the City of a Park Dedication Fee in the amount of $3r236.00. 8. Payment to the City for the legal review and filing of the plat, easements and/or covenants in the amount of $200.00. 9. Payment to the City of the final plat application fee in the eunount of $175.00, HON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Leslie Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to the following conditions: 1. Current and future owners of Lot 2, Block 1 are hereby advised that the existing non-conforming septic system that serves the residence shall be replaced within one year of the date of final subdivision approval (August 24, 1993). If the existing house is to remain, the new septic system must be installed within the septic ^ast site area 7.ocated to the west side yard of the property. An alternate septic site can be expanded along the west side of the property. The installation of any new septic system must me<?t the required separation of 75' frem any well th**.t serves the property. 2. Applicant shall be allowed to use the existing drive that serves the residence on Lot 2 during the construction of the new residence on Lot 1. Upon the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for new residence on Lot 1, applicant shall have ten (10) days to remove the existing drive on Lot 2 and cease all use of the drive. 3. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Registrai of Title on or before February 24, 1993 together with a certified original copy of this Resolution and executed copies of the easements noted above. Page 2 of 3 The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with v_ne City of Orono for subdivision review. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 24th day of August, 1992. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor STATE OP MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 24th day of August, 1992 by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 3 I From: Date: Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator AUG 2 4 1992 Jeanne A. Mabusthr Building & Zoning Administrator?/OF ORONQ August 19, 1992 Subject: #1746 Thomas and Margaret Lowe, 2630 West Lafayette Road - Variances - Resolution The resolution has been drafted per Council's conceptual approval. The deed restriction has been drafted and included in your packet for review. The covenant has been submitted to the City Attorney's Office for review and comment. As directed by Council, the deed restriction will require removal of the tennis court that is located within both Lots 12 and 13 upon application for a building permit for residential construction on Lot 13. The resolution also notes the increase in hardcover from 37% to 37.5% as it is the intent of applicant to reinstall a 176 s.f. of gazebo structure out of the 0-75' setback area and into the 75-250' setback area. This also requires variance approval. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 (B) AND SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 FILE #1746 WHEREAS, Thomas P. Lowe and Margaret Lowe (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 2630 West Lafayette Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 12 and the Southeasterly 15 feet, front and rear of Lot 11, "Shore Hills", Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) to permit the construction of an addition to the southwest side of the existing residence to be located 38' from the shoreline instead of the required 75' and where portions of the existing structure are located 16' from the shoreline and a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit an additional 566.8 s.f. of structural hardcover within the 0-75' setback area that will result in a decrease of hardcover of 349.2 s.f. or .7% and the relocation of a gazebo structure at 176 s.f. within the 75-250' setback area resulting in an increase in hardcover of .5% with total hardcover of 37.5%. Minnesota: 1. 2. 3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1746. The property is located in the LR-IB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 1 acre in area. The property consists of 54,200 s.f. or 1.24 acres. The Orono City Council reviewed this application on August 10, 1992 and recommended conceptual approval of the proposed variances cased upon the following findings: Page 1 of 7 f. a) e) The residence structure is located within the 0-75' setback area except for a detached garage. The only portions of the structure suitable for expansion are located completely within the 0-75' setback area. The basic design and layout of the residence would not allow for a vertical expansion. The proposed improvement will result in a net reduction of hardcover of 349 s.f. or .7% within the 0-75' setback area. Based on the existing topography, the majority of drainage from the hardcover improvements on the property drains to the southwest and then eventually east to the lake only after it has traveled over extensive grassed lawn areas. The residence structure was built in 1972 before existing Shoreland Regulations were in effect. There have been no major structural alterations to the house since that date except for remodeling within existing building envelope. 41% of the total area of the property is located within the 0-75' setback area. Applicants have an interest in the 1+ acre parcel to the immediate south of the property. The property remains in an undeveloped state and serves as retention area for surface runoff received from hardcover improvements on the property. The eventual removal of the tennis court from both the property and Lot 13, Shore Hills would bring applicants' property into conformance with hardcover requirement within the 75-250' setback area. Page 2 of 7 4.The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district? that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions^ light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property? would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty? is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants? and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) and Subdivision 2 to permit the construction of a 26'x21.8' addition to the southwest side of the existing residence , subject to the following conditions: 1.Existing hardcover improvements to be removed from the 0-75* setback area as shown on Page 7 of this resolution. It shall be completed prior to the footing inspection for new construction. Applicant shall remove 740 s.f. of landscape area underlain with plastic and relocate screened gazebo structure at 176 s.f. to the 75-250' setback area. 2.All persons with an interest in the property and Lot 13, Shore Hills, Hennepin County, Minnesota, have executed a deed restriction and covenant that would require the removal of the tennis court upon application for a building permit for residential construction on Lot 13. Page 3 of 7 3. 4. 5. August, ATTEST: Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on what date (August 24, 1993). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of these variances shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 24th day of 1992. Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A, Peterson, Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 4 of 7 ifirtr i STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 24th day of August, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 5 of 7 L J STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199 before ine a Notary Public within and for said county# personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) Notary Public )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 7 of 7 I J -1 lb/T-. • Ji •A • • f»»• ’ *—^_• ;•*•• _• c r ■• IV T • •-*r . c DECIARATJON of covenants . CONDITTONS AND RESTRICTIONS day of AuguaU 1992, by and among Thotnaa ?. LoweAGREEMENT made this____ and Margaret___. Lowe, husband and wife ("Ix>wcs"), Helen M. Lyman, a single person C^Lyman”), and the City of Orono, a municipal corporation ("the City"). WITNESSETH THAT: WHEREAS, Lowes ore the fee owners of real property located in the City of Orono. Hennepin County. Minnesota, and legally described as foll.ju/*: hereinafter refcxred to as "Property No. 1"); and WHEREAS, Lyman is the fee owner of real propertv- located adjacent to. and directly south of Property No. i, and legally described as follows: (hereinafter refetrsd to as "Property No. 2"); and WHEREAS. Lowea occupy a residential dwelling cn Property No. 1 which is located within 75 feet of the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka; and WHEREAS, Ptopeny No. 2 ia a buildable lor for residential purposes, but there is no residentfal dwelling currently located on Property No. 2; WHEREAS, a tennis court, including adjacent ptao and fencing, is located on the southerly portion of Property No. 1 and the nordierly portion of Property No. 2; and WHEREAS, the Lowes have appUed to the City for a building pemiit to construct an addition to the residential dwelling located on Property No. I; and WHEREAS, the addition to such residential dwelling will be located within 75 feet of Lake Minnetonka; and 4 L_ *. • •-r'. J N^jU«*<rvi^ j /(^) J-J WHEREAS, &e City, according lo City Ordinance N«r. of structures v-ithin 75 feet of Lake KEnneionlu; and ^ prohibit the building WHEREAS, the City, by Resolution No.^_____has granted to Lowes • variance toV V # ----------------------------------—— » ^ ^ ---------------------- construct the addition on t^operty No. 1; provided that, the grant of the variance Ii contingent upon Lowes and Lyman stipulating to the rcnvaval of the tennis court, adjacent patio and fencing prior to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a residential dwelling on Property No. 2. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual ^miscs and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree aa follows: 1. Grant of Variance. The City has granted to Lowes a variance for the coDStmetion of the addition to the residential dwelling located on Propeny No. I according to the plans andor me auaiuon UJ me resiuctiuai waa ‘ ------- --------- • specifications which have been submitted to, and approved by, the City and arc filed with the City in its File No. \'1 -----• 2 Removal of Tennis Court Lowcs and Lyman, for Aenasclvc^ their he«, successors and assigns, hereby covenant that prior to a building peraiit being issued for the construction of a residential dwelling on Property No. 2, they shall ren»yc, or cause to be removed, the tennis court, adjacent pado and fencing as shown on E.\hibii JT — hereto. 3. Binding Effect. This Agreexneni. and the covenants and promises wnuin^ herem, shall nm with Property No. 1 and Property No. 2 and shall be binding and enforceable agauisi the heirs, successors and assigns of Lowca and Lyman. fN WITNESS WHEREOF, the partica hereto have signed this Agrecownt on the date firer above written. Helen M. Lyman Thomas P. Low© CITY OF ORONO Marg^*et . Lowe By:. IIS'. r j • i-r^» • Oi K.4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Tlie foregoing inAmment >vas acknov^edged before me dits . 1992, by Helen M. Lynun, a aingle person. day of Notary Public STATE OF MT‘/!»IESOTA > ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing insinuncnt was acknowledged before me this _____ day of . 1992, by Thomas P, Lowe and Margaret_____ Lowe, husband and wife. Notary Public 20PHAM _HATK MEMQPANnrmt TO:Orono City Cruncil Member ft FROM :Kevin P. Staunton DATE:1 August 20, 1992 RE:Lowe Deed Restriction 3300 Piper Jeffrey Tower 222 South Ninth Street Minneapolt*. Minnesota 55-402 (612) 333-4800 COoiVCIL IWEETliVG AUG 2 4 1992 CITY OF ORONO VIA PArsThiJT^g prepared by their attorney pursuant to thi . was fhl ost.t%\*:^ejrJrour‘olf?clr?o"\ako ^suggested changes. First, we^Laaest that\ho three to include a clause that indicates that^lt amended amended to indicate that the Citv°hf« document be agreement in the futurl ?hp« ^ enforce the should have no objection to, mmoi. changes which the Lowes Technicafw*^J?‘"°r®2'^^^^°” ^^^tle more complicatedSi L-“ Encumbrance Report from a obtain an Owners and any of those restriction would be enforceable against Ly^an ?o^ 72/kps vcn MEETING AUG 2 4 1992 CITY OF ORONO A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION i (B) AND AN AFTER THE PACT VARIANCE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 PILE #1753 WHEREAS, Darlow T, Madge (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the property located at 875 Forest Arms Lane within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows; Lot 6, Bloclc 2, Forest Arms, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) to permit the following structures to be installed in front of the average setback line; pool and patio area, 18'xl3' storage shed, 5' high fence and 8'x3' lockbox and an after the fact variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 for a pump house structure located within the 0- 75' setback area resulting in 12 s.f. of hardcover where no hardcover is allowed. Minnesota ; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1753. The property is located in the LR-IB Lakeshore Residential Single Family Zoning District requiring 1 acre in area. The property consists of 61,939 s.f. or 1.42 acres. 3.The Orono City Council reviewed this application on August 10, 1992, and recommended conceptual approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings; a)The pool and patio area are to be located in front of the average lakeshore setback line within the 75-250* setback area. Total proposed improvements within the setback area are at 2,684 s.f. or 10.8%. Page 1 of 5 "7 11 4. i * f 636 s.f. of landscape area underlain with plastic was installed within the 0-75' setback zone. Applicant shall remove the plastic underliner and maintain the pump house structure resulting in 12 s.f. of hardcover. 8,811 s.f. or 42.9% hardcover exists within the 250- 500' setback area. Total hardcover within the 75-500' setback area is proposed at 11,495.5 s.f. or 25.3%. The residence structure is located 275' from the lakeshore. An extensive grassed yard area has been maintained to treat runoff to the lake. e)The homes along Forest Arms Lane have been developed in an alignment close to the road. Any proposed installation of accessory structures within the lakeshore yards of these properties require average lakeshore setback variances. The development of the flag lot to the immediate south of the property creates a major impact on the average setback line. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 2 of 5 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CON’’ TIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) and Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit the installation of accessory structures in front of the average setback line and to permit a 3*x4' pump house to remain within the 0- 75' setback area, subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Applicant shall provide an updated survey upon application for a building permit for pool and patio area locating the proposed improvements on the survey. Survey should also include the relocated shed that is currently located within a utility easement within the lakeshore yard. Applicant shall remove 636 s.f. of landscape area underlain with plastic adjacent to channel and applicant is further advised that there shall be no use of plastic underliners in landscape areas within the 0-75' setback zone except for those areas within the drainage swale where such use has been required and approved by the City. Applicant shall obtain a penalty building permit for storage shed and lockbox structure. The storage shed must be located out of utility easement area. The applicant and all future owners are hereb* placed on notice that all structures to be located in la^.eshore yard of this property shall require an average lakeshore setback variance. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 24, 1993). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 3 of 5 ' I ♦ 'V ■*# k ■'jr * The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. August, Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 24th day of 1992. ATTEST; Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 24th day of August, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 J To:Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator 7 From Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: August 20, 1992 \ IViE£TINGSubject: Scott Larson, 2112 Sugarwood Drive - Request'for Driveway Realignment ^ 4 1992 CITY OF ORONOExhibits A - Applicant's Request B - Sid Rebers/Developer's Letter C - Bruce W. Schmitt, Architect's Letter D - William R. Bonner, Charles Cudd Construction Letter (Owner of Parcel to Immediate West) E - Survey Approved with Building Permit F - Proposed Driveway Realignment G “ Supplemental Sheets to Building Permit Applications for Residential Construction within Sugar Woods Plat H - Location Map At the August 17th meeting of the Planning Comm•ssion, Mr. Larson made a special appeal to the Planning Commission to review a driveway realignment request realizing that he had not followed the appropriate procedure process established by both City and developer. Mr. Larson's problem is that he plans to complete and present his home for review during the fall Parade of Homes in mid-September. The next meeting of the Planning Commission on September 21st would be too late to complete driveway installation and finil landscaping. Please review Exhibit A. Mr. Larson notes the specific characteristics of the lot that would necessitate a driveway realignment reviewed as follows: 1. No further trees to be removed in front street yard. 2.Minimizes land alterations as existing more graduated grades are utilized in front yard. 3.Aesthetic impact of a straight driveway alignment on a house of this magnitude and also impacts a desired natural setting of overall project. 4. Straight alignment would result in safety concerns as of a 6' difisrence in elevations from road to garage door. The Planning Commission denied Mr. Larson's request 3-1. Denial was based predominately on the fact that Mr. Larson had adequate time to prepare for an application before the Planning Commission. Merits of the request were not considered. Zoning Pile August 20, 1992 Page 2 The minority opinion of one found the hardships acceptable and recognized that this was Mr. Larson's first time building within the Sugar Woods Plat. f Options of Action Denial per Planning Commission recommendation or Approval as proposed. /V ScottLarsonHomes 213 Crestridge Drive • Burnsville. /Minnesota 55337 • (612) 435-6660 I I. August 17, 1992 Planning Conmission of Orono 1355 Brown Road South Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Gentlemen and Ladies of the Commission: The 1992 Scott Larson Homes Parade of Homes entry is now being constructed at 2112 Sugar Woods Drive in Orono. I should like to have landscape site plan approval including driveway location and landscape p’ers adjacent the front sidewalk approved at this evening's meeting. Toward this end I am enclosing a Landscape Plan dated Aug\ist 11, 1992 by D.R. Griwwold and Associates, Registered Landscape Architect of Burnsville. Also enclosed is a rendered elevation from Bruce Schmitt and Associates, Registered Architect of Wayza ta. 2) 3) The proposed plan offers the following benefits not otherwise accomplished: 1) It minimizes the removal of trees in the front and sideyard areas. No further existing trees need to be removed; Minimal ground cover i.*= disturbed; Minimum excavating, retaining walls, backfill and forced grades are required with the current placement. This not only enhances the perceived value of the lot but the natural setting of the homesite and the overall project; It also provides nearly level access to the garage for safety reasons rather than a 6 foot descent from the street to the garage. Icy conditions in the winter could easily render drivers slipping directly into expensive garage doors. Equally dangerous conditions result from egress onto Sugar Woods Drive. 4) 1 Finally, I am enclosing copies of letters from the architect, the Dev­ eloper and a fellow builder in Sugar Woods with their positive recomm­ endation of my proposed plan. Thank you for your assistance ^'resident :ii; 17 '9Z It.:03 PEEEFS COHSTPUCTIC‘f'1 P.3 / ^ V l^bersffomes Sidney Bernhard Rebers, hlasler Builder 5KUCE W SCHMITT & ASSOCIATES-RA. 319 5ADDY AVENUE 60UTH WAYZATA. MINNE60TA ^391 (612) 476-6222 ^3^ RCniTECTS August 17, 1992 Scott Larson Scott Larson Construction, Inc. 213 Crestridge Drive Burnsville, MN 55337 REFERENCE:SCOTT LARSON CONSTRUCTION, INC. PLAN 741 - MODEL HOME 2112 SUGAR WOODS DRIVE ORONO, MINNESOTA Dear Mr. Larson: This letter responds to your question regarding the driveway location at this project site. Scott, I again strongly suggest that you pursue approval of the driveway location indicated by the plan. Changing it, in my opinion, would affect the aesthetics and the most logical use of the lot. Let me try to explain the factors I considered in determining the location of this driveway. The primary aesthetic intent was to create or allow some privacy and seclusion from Sugar Woods Drive. Another intent was to screen the garage doors from sight when viewed from Sugar Woods Drive as I felt that a head on view of them was not what this development was looking for and that the additional cost for extra blacktop would be well worth it. Another aesthetic point in favor of the current location is that it allows less existing vegetation to be disturbed thereby preserving the unaffected natural appearance of the lot as an outgrowth of the woodlands rather than an invasion into it. Now on to the logistics. Its only natural that the driveway should enter the lot at a location somewhat level with the garage floor elevation. Given the existing grades, the curve of the driveway allows a less drastic transition of any remaining difference in grade. LARSON/SUGAR WOODS MODF.L Letter to Mr. Larson, continued August 17, 1992 Page 2 Our intent was to avoid the fnishaps that could result from a slight coating of snow or ice on a steeply descending driveway. We foresaw not being able to stop at the foot of the drive and possibly colliding into or through the garage doors. We also foresee problems not only in climbing the ascent to Sugar Woods Drive, but once there, being obliged to check for traffic before pulling out and possibly getting stuck or sliding off the crest of the hill. The driveway as shown on the plan addresses Sugar Woods Drive at a 90° angle and allows as clear a view of traffic in both directions as a driveway running directly out to Sugar Woods Drive from the garage. Please consider these points and give me a call for further discussion. 1 Sincerely^ /Bruce W.y Schmitt BWS/cs CB-17-1552 17:IS 612 731 43=5 CHARuF.S CUDD CO.P.02 D Charles Cudd Co. DESIGNERS ♦ BUILDERS H>istinctit/e ciutan homts end niighSorkoods since 19S0 August 17/ 1992 Orono Planning Coitimiaaion RS: Scott Larson Parade Horoe To Whom It May Concern: This letter is to let you know that we have no concern about the driveway plan Scott haa aub*Tiitted to you. In fact/ it seems to make far more sense with reference to existing grades. Therefore/ we would encourage your approval. Respectfully submitted, ...William R. Bonner General Manager .Wayzata Office • * •» / (612)731-3153 1802 Wooddale Drive, Woodbury. MN 55125 FAX (612) 731-4869 SURVEY FOR; SCOTT LARSOr-i CONST. MC Prepared By;m I ...GfG09*003 i2i e2C52 o8:>This drawing has been checked and reviewed tiii: /7 t*/; day ofA-oni / ~ . 19 ^72. '.m.SevV. >?v.*IOO0.38 ' \ SCHOELL & MADSON. INC.r^HQiNPcns •stinvFYon^ •^ifcWMrns SOIL l£STINQ . tMVIROHUeHTAL SEnVtCCS ifsie waviata iivo. MIICMIIOMKA. VH. «»9«9 l■lll ««A-t«91 rAX* tCt-ttlA ^ooos ORive OnSCRIPTlON: Lot 7, Block 4, SUGAR WOODS, according to the recorded plat thereof. BLNCIIMARK: Spike in lath in 15-inch Ash tree as shown. Elevation » 1014.25 (NGVD-1929). GENERAL NOIES; 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. • - Denotes iron monument found. o - Denotes iron monument set. n - Denotes wood stake set. xlOOS.3 - Denotes existing spot elevation. x(100/.0) - Denotes proposed spot elevation. — -Denotes the direction of 7. 0. 9. ----150.2/,.- CTvi ' ORONO ,o. Jr._ SITE PLAN VfAFPROVl-D GRADING PLAN □ APiWjVED.': ■rl REVISIONS BY J / . /_____-pste 7—.E^.. surface drainage. Proposed garage floor elevation = 1014.^5. Proposed first floor elevation » lOWns. Verify sewer service invert prior to house construction. This basement may be too low to be served by gravity flowage. Rev.-24.^1 io oiiovT neW cli ivc iocolion. 1 hereby certify that this survey was prepared under my supervision and that I am a Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. sy.■jf/9 Theodore D. Kemna IK 4 i > I \ SURVEY FOR; SCOTT LflgSON CONST. INC.Prepared By:|€l6Q9-003 121 62C52 06^This drawing has been checked and reviewed this /7 't''/; day of/ . 19 San.Se^/.MM. /nv.‘1008.38 bv SCHOELL & MADSON, INC.ENGINCEnS •$UnVtYOMS •PLANNERS SOIL TESTING • ENVIR0NMEN1AL SCUVICSS leSIO WATZATA BIVO. UINNEIONKA, UN «S30 mil i4i-fioi rAi:i4i-toii ^OODS DRIVE- /fn°v" <5 . SeiV. MU. loo/.o \oo1-^ DESCRIPTION; Lot 7, Block 4, SUGAR WOODS, according to the recorded plat thereof. BENCHMARK: Spike in lath in 15-inch Ash tree as shown. Elevation » 1014.25 (NGVD-1929). GENERAL NOTES: 1. 2. 3. 4. b. 6. • - Denotes iron monument found, o - Denotes iron monument set. o - Denotes wood stake set. X1005.3 - Denotes existing spot elevation. x(1007.8) - Denotes proposed spot elevation. ^— -Denotes the direction of 7. 8. 9. surface drainage. Proposed garage floor elevation » 1014.25. Proposed first floor elevation » 10l4.*i3. Verify sewer service invert prior to construction. This basement may be too low to be served by gravity flowage. I hereby certify that this survey was prepared under my supervision and that 1 am a Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Mint^sota. Iheodore D. Kemna &SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET TO BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF SUGAR WOODS SUBDIVISION In addition to the plans, specifications and inforniaticn requested in the Orono Building Permit Application packet, the following is required by special resolution of the Orono City Council of all applicants seeking to obtain a building permit within the Sugar Woods subdivision: 1. Your site plan must designate the Specific Building Setback Area for your lot- A) front 50', rear 50' and side 40' for Lots 1 through 4, Block 1; and B) front 50', rear 50' and side 30' for all other lots in Blocks 1, 2, 3 and 4. 2. Per Orono resolution #2652, each lot shall be served by a single driveway/one curb cut at a 20' maxi mum allowed width. The driveway width shall be measured parallel to the loop road, Sugarwood Drive. The portion of the drive located within the front/street setback area shall be placed in a straight alignment from the loop road and shall not be curved . 3. An inventory of all hardcover on the lot must accompany each application (see worksheet attached. Attachment A). All hardcover improvements on each lot shall be within the building pad defined as that portion of the lot that is net within the building setback area (exception: the driveway leading to Sugarw'oods Drive located within the front building setback area, retaining walls and similar land” scaoina structures that may be built within the front building setback area). The hardcover improvements for each lot shall not exceed 80% of the area of the building pad for each lot. The hardcover areas of each lot shall include the surface area on the ground of each of the foilo^w ing improvements on the lot (the inventory snail include allowed improvements within the front/street setback area): A) Footprint of each and every structural improvement on the lot, including each house, garage, accessory building, porch and covered walkway; B) All wooden decks and boardwalks regardless of the spacing between the planks on the surface; C) All driveways and parking areas that are paved or graveled; E) All walkways and patios that are covered with asphalt, concrete, paving blocks (regardless of the space in between the blocks), or covered with gravel, rock or woodchips upon an underliner (whether the underliner is impervious or not), but not those walkways that are dirt, grass or gravel, rock or woodchios without an underliner; 4. 5. 6, 7. F) Each and every landscaped area with an underliner (whether the underliner is imoervious or not), regardless of whether the area is covered with woodchips, stones, dirt or plants; G) Any swimming pool or wading pool; H) Any tennis court covered with concrete, asphalt or clay, but not any tennis court covered with grass. Lot Coverage. Per Ordi.nance 80, 2nd Series adopted February 26, 1990, the total combined footprint areas of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 15% of the 1 acre average density at 6,534 sf. The following shall i^^cluded in calculation of lot coverage by structures! a) b) c) all roofed structures which extend more than 6* above grade level; tennis courts, patios, decks and all similar open structures when partially or fully enclosed'by fences, railings or walls which extend more than 6' above grade level { if any portion of such structure extends more than 6' above grade level, the entire structure shall count towards let coverage); pools, including pool basin and associated deck or patio areas, regardless of whether such pool basin, deck or patio is enclosed with a fence. All lots shall be provided with a functional means or method backing out. ^ The City will not approve the backing out of motorized vehicles onto Sugarwood Drive. For all applicants who find they cannot meet the requix*ed standards for development within the Sugar Woods Planned Residential Development, please refer to Attachment B for special directions. ^^^itten confimia'**ion from Rebers Construction that the building plans and site plan have been approved by the Architectural Review Committee for Sugar Woods. At the time a Certificate of Occupancy is issued for a new dwelling within the subdivision of Sugar Woods, the City has agreed to execute and deliver to the owner of each lot a partial release of subdivider's agreement for that lot. Upon the recordation of such partial release of subdivider's agreement, the Registrar of Titles is authorized and instructed to remove from the Certificate of Title for the lot, the memorial of this instrument and the memcrial of the partial release of subdivider's agreement. Please contact the Building and Zoning Deoartment (473-7357) if you have any questions concerning the directives listed above. ^ any site preparation, tree cutting, land derations or construction, the BuiIding Setback Area must be Refined on the site with plastic or wooden snow fencing. This fencing must remain on the site until a representative of the RuiIding Department provides written confirmation that fencing may be removed. " Attachrr.ent B REVIEW PROCEDURE 70R ALL APPLICANTS UNABLE TO MEET SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN SUGAR WOODS PLAT All owners' or builders' seeking special consideration must submit a written request to the Zoning Administrator 7 days before the official Planning Commission meeting for the month (third Monday of the month). The City Council of Orono has approved an abbreviated review process for all such request whereby the Planning Commission shall assume the sole responsibility for the review and final recommendation regarding these special requests. Each applicant shall have the right of appeal before the Council of all decisions of the Planning Commission. Ail appeals to the Council shall be placed on the Council agendas for the following Monday (fourth Monday of the month). AoDiicants inav find that the strict enforcement of these special requirements for residential development to not be practical nor functional when certain site conditions are found within a building lot. The following site conditions are listed below as examples to assist applicants in the preparation of their specific request: 1. the shape or limited area of a building envelope: 2. unique or mature trees within a building envelope or front/street setback area; 3. the topography of a building envelope; HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET Attachment A Pronosed Hardcover - a. House length wiatn b. Garage X X c. Driveway (include area within front setback area) d. Sidewalk X X e. Patio/ Deck/Pool/ Pond X f. Landscape areas underlain with pervious or impervious sheeting/_ _ _ _ _ _ x _ _ _ _ fabric X g. Other X TOTAL HARDCOVER S.f. S. f. s.f. s ^ S.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. S • i. • s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. Lot Area ___________ s.f. - Building Setback Area = Building Pad Area __________ s.f. s.f. Allowed Hardcover Building Pad Area s.f. X 80'i =O • Jk. • REVIEW PROCEDURE FOR ALL APPLICANTS UNABLE TO MEET SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN SUGAR WOODS PLAT Attachrr.ent B All ov/ners' or builders' seeking special consideration must submit a written request to the Zoning Administrator 7 days before the official Planning Commission meeting for the month (third Monday of the month). The City Council of Orono has approved an abbreviated review process for all such request whereby the Planning Commission shall assume the sole responsibility for the review and final recommendation regarding these special requests. Each applicant shall have the right of appeal before the Council of all decisions of the Planning Commission. Ail appeals to the Council shall he placed on the Council agendas for the following Monday (fourth Monday of the month ). App1 icants may find that the strict enforcement of these special requirements for residential development to not be practical nor functional when certain site conditions are fourd within a building lot. The following site conditions are listed below as examples to assist applicants in the preparation of their soecific recuest: 1. the shape or limited area of a building envelope; 2. unique or mature trees within a building envelope or front/street setback area; 3. the topography of a building envelope; 4. desire to place house within a building pad so as to minimize impact on adjacent properties. All special requests shall consist either of one or more of the following submittals, depending upon the specific site conditions t oe considered: 1. survey/site plan designating structures, pathways, drives and type of back out improvement; 2. inventory of hardcover (be sure to include all hardcover within front street/street setback area); 3. topographic mapping of property; 4. location of mature, unique tree specimens; 5. other unique physical characteristics of property that reauires soecial olacement of house/drive on site. ;. ]•• • • • ^N 1/2 SEa 34, T.H8.R.0I ♦.< /^/‘Q**,. 'Vn*^ •^st/w u. n#iiAil \ Cl Vi»209 400feet > >2 O) SEC <aS^ (3^ 'ifj ' W‘‘r^ J Vv - ^ «il »PIMA* Kt06( UUII :"p»i . -* I1^00 //5j00 ’/54#4' moo su^oiiyt 2l 2 ?i ^ ii8, R.c5 .i\ M S7-35IJ- w J^0?69 4I!* *p "• -- * ’a »'A j •‘*^,./W-fJrll ! 5f ! I tmSwj.5^-, ^ Z\oo ^ J. j; n .'rft '" I •’ i ? 1 5i II /3<l hr'! jjZ; p?wCr r.iic ^ p • « , ^1) «I ri N* ^ '•^ II ^ \[l 0 , .11 • ^. II .. **;*> n *T\? ^ Jfl I i: I ’! • I I I r•' • ' !^4r T •III 5- ^in. _ K ^4,. I's ■*•. l iw w II . » ^ ~ “ ------— •- cunor * 'V.~*’^|-'*';oo5<r —IP > r*«i^ *9 I **^ f :< I 5 • I / s -5 !- lii ✓Kpl imst 'i*J/ ;<? i:;J ^ rjrrsf^r*—ir.;.;] n, f _ *3 5s • ^ # *y ' I 5»X I I Z-3^ / , * ^ ^ ^ V —* . rvnot ^ t —.——^ > I 9 "I." f/,iy,ii ■"'-^-^•i=^=.H::^H-::-^i------/lur:i!^,i * J i«»v »«-*'oo-.{. • t.-rj;i-^ j tjSJi. v /- .-^ I ■" “it I -i-LjSs if, ■ ;t I TSvSfji,.. .. i--'ii '■ : f L' ^io) — 7ft (7^ < 3410 l^") 14 /^C y ^4^e) ( aoo _______^UACC or OfVONO VIULACC or long lakc Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator vOiLMECTlU Prom; Date: Subject Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning AdnAUSs£r4itld92 July 28.. 1992 CITY OF ORONO Proposed Ordinance Amendments/P.estructuring; Section 9.21 - Public Nuisance - (New) Section 9.23 - Participation in Noisy Parties List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Code Prior to 5/9/88 Ordinance No. 51, Second Series, Adopted 5/9/88 Current Code Proposed Ordinance Summary As a result of Mr. Callahan's proposal to place the styrofoam ordinance in Chapter !> (Public Protection, Crimes and Offenses), and the subsequent cJiscussions in reference to the public nuisance section of the code, staff reviewed the public nuisance section and found it to be in disarray. Subsection 9.21 referenced in the Styrofoam Ordinance, was revised in 1988 at the request of Chief Kilbo and Mr. Bernhardson, to include language relating specifically to participation in noisy parties or gatherings. Unfortunately (and apparently inadvertently), their ordinance had the effect of deleting the prior language rather than adding to it. It is clear from a review of the Council paclcet of May 9, 1988 that there was no intent to drop the public nuisance definition language. Apparently, neither Ed nor the City Attorney have updated code booJcs. Therefore, when Ed referenced Section 9.21 as providing a definitlDn of public nuisance, I was understandably perplexed. The solution is to readopt the language previously dropped from Section 9.21, and, as initially suggested by City Attorney Bryan Crawford in his letter of April 21, 1988, readopt the "Noisy Parties" Ordinance as Section 9.23. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed ordinances to reinstate the public nuisance definition as Section 9.21 and readopt the Noisy Parties Ordinance as Section 9.23. Isv C^oi^ i • »-. ,_>-/• c^5 § 9.20 SEC. 9.20. DISORDERLY CONDUCT. It is unlawful for any .V ■? nrr _ or ro^QonASloI person^ in a public or private place, knowing, or having reasonable ^'^grounds to know, that it will, or will tend____ -- _____, -- _________ to, alarm, anger or disturb others or provoke any assault or breach of the peace, to do the following: (1) engage in brawling or fighting; or, (2) disturb an assembly or meeting, not unlawful in its character; or, (3) engage in offensive, obscene or abusive language or in boisterous and noisy conduct tending reasonably to arouse alarm, anger or resentment in others; or, (4) willfully and lewdly expose his person or the private parts thereof, or procure another to so expose himself; and any open or gross lewdness or lascivious behavior, or any act of public indecency; or, (5) whether or not posted with signs so prohibiting, voluntarily enter the waters of any river or public swimming pool at any time when said waters are not properly supervised by trained life~saving personnel in atten~ dance for that purpose, or enter such waters without being garbed in a bathing suit sufficient to cover his person and equal to the standards generally adopted and accepted by the public; or, (6) urinate or defecate in a place other than (a) if on public property then in a plumbing fixture provided for that purpose, or (b) if on the private property of another then in a plumbing fixture provided for that purpose, or (c) if on private property not owned or con­ trolled by another, then within a building; or, (7) cause the making or production of an unnecessary noise by shouting or by any other means or mechanism including the blowing of any automobile or other vehicle horn; or, (8) use a sound amplifier upon streets and public property without prior written permission from the City; or, *(9) use a flash or spotlight in a manner so as to annoy or endanger others; or, (10) cause defacement, destruction, or otherwise damage to any premises or any property located thereon; or, (il) screw, scatter, litter, throw, dispose of or deposit any refuse, garbage, or rubbish unto any premises except into receptacles provided for sucn purpose; or, (12) enter any motor vehicle of another without the consent of the owner or operator; or, (13) fail or refuse to vacate or leave any premises after being requested or ordered, whether orally or in writing, to do so, by the owner, or person in charge thereof, or by any law enforcement agent or official; pro­ vided, however, that this provision shall not apply to any person who is owner or tenant of the premises involved uor to any law enforcement or other government official who may be present thereon at that time as part of his official duty, nor shall it include the wife, children, employee or tenant of such owner or occupier. SEC. 9.21. PUBLIC NUISANCE. It is unlawful fcr any person to maintain a public nuisance by his act or failure to perform a legal duty, and for purposes of this Section, a public nuisance shall be defined as any of the following: (1) maintaining or permitting a condition which unreasonably annoys, injures or endangers the safety, health, morals, comfort or repose of any considerable number of members of the public; or, (2) interfering with, obstructing or rendering dangerous for passage, any street, public right-of-way, or waters used by the public; or, (3) any other act or omission declared by law to be a public nuisance. ORONC CC 213 (4-1-84) h <%• v:- vj V •• rv '!r *< *N% <1 VI \ ORDINANCE NO. 51, SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 9.20 (8) DISORDERLY CON^D^^ AND ORDINANCE NO. 9.21 PUBLIC NUISANCE ADOPTED APRIL ) The City Council of Orono ordains: ordinance No. 9.20 (8) DisorderIv Conduct and Ordinance No. 9.21 Public Nuisance adopted April 1, 19^4^s amended to read: Sec. 9.20 Disorderly Conduct. (8) Using or operating or permitting the use or operation of any radio receiving set, musical instrument, phonograph, paging system, machine or other device for the production or reproduction of sounds in a distinct and loudly audible manner so as to distrub the peace, quiet, and comfort of any person nearby without prior written permission from the City. Sec. 9.21 Public Nuisance. Sub. 1. Participation in Noisy Parties or Gatherings. A. No person shall congregate because of, or participate in, repose of other persons. B. A police officer may order all persons present at such party or gathering ocher than the owners, residents or tenants oE building or place to immediately disperse. Any person who shall refuse to leave after being ordered to do so by a police officer shall be guilty of a violation of this ordinanc'^.-. C. Any owner, tenant or resident of the building or place who has knowledge of the distrubance and fails to immediately abate said distrubance shall be guilty of a violation of this Division. D. Any person violating or failing to comply with any ppQyision of this ordinance shall upon conviction thereof, be gu ty of a misdemeanor. E. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according wO law. Passed by the Council this 9th day of May, 1988. ! • > ••0^ **^ ,. V* * \,.,3 Ml• . 3SEC. 9.21. PUBLIC NUISANCE.Subd. 1. Participation in Noisy Patties or Gatherings. A. No person shall congregate because of, or party or gathering of people from which noise emanates of a sufficient volume or of such nature to disturb the peace, quiet, or repose of other persons. B. A police officer may order all persons present at such party or gathering other than the owners, residents or tenants of the building or place to immediately disperse. Any person who shall refuse to leave after being ordered to do so by a police officer shall be guilty of a violation of this ordinance. C. Any owner, tenant or resident of the building or place who has knowledge of the disturbance and fails to immediately abate said disturbance shall be guilty of a violation of this Division. D. Any person violating or failing to comply with any provision of this ordinance shall uoon conviction thereof, be guilty of a misdemeanor. E. This ordinance shall be in full iorce and effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. Ordinance 51, 2nd Series Adopted: 5-9-88 i • » SEC. 9.22. PERMITTING A PUBLIC NUISANCE. It is unlawful for any person to permit real property under his control to be used to maintain a public nuisance, or let the same to another knowing it is to be so used. Source: City Code Effective Date: 4-1-84 (Sections 9.23 through 9.29, inclusive, reserved for future expansion.) ORONO CC 214 (4-1-84 ) -V i AN ORDINANCE AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 9.21, PUBLIC NUISANCE; AND ADDING SECTION 9.23, PARTICIPATION IN NOISY PARTIES OR GATHERINGS The City Council of Orono ordains; Section 1. Section 9.21 of the Municipal Code as revised by Ordinance No. 51, Second Series on May 9, 1988, is hereby amended to read as follows; SECTION 9.21. PUBLIC NUISANCE. It is unlawful for any person to maintain a public nuisance by his act or failure to perform a legal duty, and for purposes of this section, a public nuisance shall be defined as any of the following; (1) Maintaining or permitting a condition which unreasonably annoys, injures, or endangers the safety, health, morals, comfort or repose of any considerable number of members of the public; or, (2) interfering with, obstructing or rendering dangerous for passage, any street, public right-of-way, or waters used by the public; or, (3) any other act or omission declared by law to be a public nuisance. Section 2. The Municipal Code c£ Orono is herely amended by adding Section 9.23, PARTICIPATION IN NOISY PARTIES OR GATHERINGS, to read as follows; SECTION 9.23. PARTICIPATION IN NOISY PARTIES OR GATHERINGS. A. No person shall congregate because of, or participate in, any party or gathering of people from which noire emanates of a sufficient volume or of such nature to distirb the peace, quiet, or repose of other persons. B. A police officer may order all persons present at such party or gathering other than the owners, residents or tenants of the building or place to immediately disperse. Any person who shall refuse Lo leave after being ordered to do so by a police officer shall be guilty of a violation of this ordinance. C. Any owner, tena’^t or resident of the building or place who has knowledge of the disturbance and fails to immediately abate said disturbance shall be guilty of a violation of this ordinance. A-Mii- i— D. Any person violating or failing to comply with any provision of this ordinance shall upon conviction thereof, be guilty of a misdemeanor. Section 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota on this 10th day of August, 1992. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor / To: From: Date: Subject: COUNCIL MEETINGLake Use Committee M'chael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning August 10, 1992 CITY OF ORONO North Shore Drive Marina - License Issues & Recommendations List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Discussion 1992 License Application 1984 License (last license issued) Past Hardcover/Parking Plan L;!-idscape Plan Compilation History of Number of Slips Notes Regarding Issues May 28, 1992 Letter July 17, 1992 Letter to LMCD Staff has meet with Mark and Debbie Breneman, operators of North Shore Drive Marina, 3 or 4 times this spring and summer. The various issues brought up in the May 28, 1992 letter have been discussed with the Brenemans, and I have outlined my thoughts on these in the notes attached as Exhibit F, Based on the attached documentation, discussions with the Marina operators, and in an attempt to work towards getting a license issued, I would make the following recommendation. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of a license for North Shore Drive Marina for the 1992 Season, issued retroactively to include the 1991, 1990 and 1988 seasons, finding that the concerns of the City which led to the withholding of previous licenses have been satisfactorily resolved. This license is issued subject to the following conditions: 1. License is issued for 93 slips in the water, with the following breakdown; 76 rental 4 service 13 transient/rack staging/company boats/etc 93 Total 2. No more than 20 of the 72 existing dry stack spaces may be used as dry rental slips for boats stored for on- demand launching. The remaining 52 drystack slots may be used to house boats that are stored for service, sale, etc, except as noted in item 3 below. North Shore Drive Marina August 10r 1992 Page 2 of 3 s t* fv) e 3. The maximum permitted totalyv^boat density on the property, including wet slips, dry slips and on-land storage of boats stored for any purpose is 151 boats. 4. Maximum permitted winter boat density (includes on land, racks, and boats stored in the lake under deicing measures) is 100 for the current season. Maximum winter boat density for any given year is 122. ^ 5. Applicant shall provide c winter storage site plan defining the location of required winter parking spaces and the location of winter stored boats. 6. Applicant is advised that a license for the 1993 license year will not be issued until the following requirements have been meet: a. Agree to acceptable time frame for completing plantings required per the attached landscape plan which identifies plantings required in the past but which have never been completed. b. Likewise, licensee shall agree to a time frame for removal of gravel areas between the drystacks and the road, such gravel to be replaced with sod. c. Licensee shall provide photo documentation of the gravel area west of the lagoon existing prior to the 1984 service building variance review, or shall agree to a time frame for reverting such gravel area to grass. d. Applicants shall further agree to constructing and maintaining a minimum 10' grass buffer along the lagoon border and all shoreline areas. e. Licensee shall agree i_o a time frame for development of a drainage detention pond, included regrading of the property as necessary to maximize the portion of hard surface areas flowing to that pond. f. Licensee is encouraged to at the earliest possible opportunity, riprap the lagoon and shoreline where lakeshore bank erosion is occuring. 7. Licensee shall provide an updated parking plan that includes dociamentation of how charter boat customer parking is handled. 8. Licensee shall legally combine the 3 tax parcels before any further building permits will be issued. MINUTES OF THE LAKE USE COMMITTEE - August 12, 1992^ ~ _I ’ - iii L'U Lm it The meetina of the Lake Use Committee of the City of Orono was held pursuant to noti-e at 7:45 a.m.« Wednesday, August 12, 1992 at the Orono Council Chambers. Chairman Ed Callahan, Gabriel Jabbour, J. Diann Goetten, Charles Kelley and Charles Schroeder of the Committee and staff members Mike Gaffron and Jeanne Mabusth were present. Mark and Debbie Breneman, Jim Dunn and Beth Whittaker were present representing area marinas. The minutes of the Lake Use Committee meetings of June 24, 1992 and July 8, 1992 were approved. Chairman Callahan referred to the packet regarding licenses for North Drive Marina and Lakeside Marina. It was the recommendation of staff to grant licenses to these two marinas back to 1991. Although Gayles Marina was not reviewed at this time, it could be presumed there would also be a recommendation for approval of their license. Jabbour agreed with the staff recommendation, however, Callahan felt the licenses should be denied. He referred to the staff recommendation in the Lakeside Marina memo, "Staff finds questionable valie in further denial or withholding of a license for ....". He said, without being critical of staff, that staff wanted to approve these because they don't know what else to do. Jabbour asked if the denial was based on existing ordinances. Callahan replied that it was based upon the that fact if we reject the licenses and then try to enforce the operation without licenses that it will create a fight and we shouldn't do that, so what we ought to do is uell them to be good next year and we will let them by this year. It has been the position of the City that the three maiinas in question are not in compliance with licensing requirements. North Shore Drive Marina has been working on changes but still have violations in some areas. It is staff's view that Lakeside Marina does not intend ho reduce the number of boats to the licensing requirement along with other rhings stated in the May 28, 1992 letter. Callahan feels that since violations exist, there is no purpose served and it would be improper to give a license to these marinas. Gaffron wanted to review issues regarding each marina. Callahan stated there was a simpler way and asked if there were violations. Gaffron responded that it depended interepretation of code. There is no question that ther- many parts of the code they do not comply with. Callahan state! since this is true and there are violations, no license should be given. The question of tagging is a separate issue. It does not seem licenses should be given for something that they have already done since they have already operated marinas in 1991. Callahan asked if everyone agreed that if the marina is in violation, no license should be issued. Goetten concurred that if someone is trying to work out th- situation, that is not enough to give them the license. She asked Gaffron to continue discussion of the staff recommendation I • f MINUTES OF THE LAKE USE COMMITTEE - August 12, 1992 should not be granted until the marina is in conformity. If they are not in conformity with the code and the interpretations of the code, Callahan finds it extremely difficult to give them a license and easy to deny the license. The reason for turning down the license will be the sections they are in violation of. Gaffron stated this did not so3ve any problems. ^ Callahan responded the problem of what to do about the 1992 licenses is out of the way. Jabbour asked if they were being denied a license because of violations to the landscaping code. Callahan said if they were in violaiton of the code at all they should be denied a license. Goetten asked what the next step would be if the licenses were denied. Callahan said, "move to Item 2 on the Agenda which is changing the ordinances". Jabbour added that if the licenses were to be denied, nothing should be enforced for awhile. Callahan stated that they were not being asked to enforce anything, only to grant licenses. Debbie Breneman asked if their money would be returned for the years that have been paid. Jabbour explained that the money was not to buy a license but for the aoplication. The payment of money does not guarantee a license. C.illahan added that the Lake Use Committee has no power to deny licenses and that there would be no repayment of fees, at least that is how he would vote at Council. Kelley commented that he would like to let the past be the past and rewrite the ordinances moving forward. Attempts will be made to refer back to previous codes. Jabbour also added that the Committee should advise the Council that code as it exists does not lend itself to the operation of the marinas in the 1990's and a new code needs to be prepared based on the 1990's and beyond. He specifically noted the sale of boats at marinas as being prohibited by the Comprehensive Plan yet he feels boat sales should be allowed. Kelley made a motion for the Committee to deny the licenses of the marinas based on the non-conformity with the current codes, directing staff not to issue any citations because of those non-conformities and also directing staff to begin working on updating the code. Goetten seconded the motion. 4 Ayes, 0 Nays, Jabbour Abstain. This will be brought to the August 24 Council meeting. Callahan suggested the Committee direct the staff to prepare a report of the existing violations so the Council will have a clear cut understanding of the reasons why the licenses should not be granted under the present code. If the staff comes to the conclusion there are no violations, then that will be reported. Kelley added this should be kept very short, listing each marina with three or four things with no narrative. Continuing with a discussion about how to deal with revisions to the ordinances, Callahan reviewed the minutes of the 14INDTES OF THE LAKE DSE COMMITTEE - August 12, 1992 June 24, 1992 meeting. He noted that the licensing section is linked to the land use section of the code and felt these two areas should be separate. One of the problems with the marinas is that the nature of the business is intrusive upon the neighorhood and City. He thinks there should be regulation of the operation of the business in a way that satisfies the needs of the City and the residents. The City wants them to conform to certain requirements about the use of the land and zoning but the main concerns would be the encroachment upon the neighboring businesses both on land and on boats, hours of operation and the "commotion" the business causes. The present code limits the activities of the marinas so that it doesn't cover current activities such as boat clubs or charter boat operations. These have more to do with the running of the business than land use. He suggests considering the licensing ordinance section of the code to define marinas, if necessary, and their activities. They should be required to be licensed, apply once a year, have the license authorize activites they would be allowed to do, deal with dry stacking as a building, require them to stay within an envelope that extends into the water and maintain a sufficient number of parking spaces within their property. Kelley asked if this meant there would be a separate code section just for marinas. Callahan replied there was currently a separate section. Kelley agreed and then asked if there would be language saying there would be no "jumping" between code sections but staying within one section. He felt this caused some of the confusion. Gaffron did not feel this was a problem and gave an example of parking. There are other sections of code that define the size of a parking space that affects all parking in the City. The number of parking spaces required is defined in the marina section based on the number of slips and the square footage of retail space. This is in both the marina and licensing sections. Callahan stated certain things in the zoning code such as setbacks and building envelope should be part of the license. General land use violations should be left for enforcement under the land use section. Parking spaces could be applied to the license. The license should come up for revocation if violations of the license exist. If a license is revoked, it should not be reinstated automatically the following year. In Callahan's opinion, the enforcement of this section should not be with the Building and Zoning Department but rather the Police Department. In the case of operations (boat clubs or charter boats), the owner of the marina should be the operator and not be sub-leased. Jabbour brought up the issue of parking and charter boats as they would require more spaces. This does not mean the marina should not be allowed to do it, only that these activities should be contained and not "spill over" into the neighborhood. Callahan agreed that boat clubs and charter boats will require more parking spaces. r MINUTES OF THE LAKE USE COMMITTEE - August 12, 1992 with North Shore Drive Marina. Gaffron referred to this issue regarding the number of slips in the water. The most immediate past license was for 88 slips. The LMCD has been licensing 93 slips in the water for the last 6 or 7 years. The LMCD was counting slips along the lagoon shoreline and the south side differently than the City. Jabbour asked if the LMCD was licensing slips or water useage. Debbie Breneman stated this has been changed 3 times. Gaffron noted the LMCD listed 113 units including 20 transient. Post-1987 they were at 93 plus 72 rack slips. The number 93 goes back to inconsistencies in counting the number of slips based on one or two boats in a slip. According to Gaffron, 93 would seem to be a reasonable and correct numJ’-er. It was down to 88 in some of the transition years. Jabbour commented that in the 20 years since he has been here he has never seem the marinas on Maxwell Bay get along with the City, It will be virtually an impossible task to enforce the number of slips. He thinks the site should be viewed and then determine the density the site can handle. The marina owner can then determine how to run his business. Most of these places have already identified the maximum by site through court settlement. The LMCD changes constantly so the City should forget about their numbers. Callahan disagreed. When the letter was written on May 28, 1992, the Committee agreed that a license for 93 slips could not be granted under the existing ordinances. He feels it is an improper act on the part of the City to give a license for things which are not correct. Jabbour asked for direction to be given to marina owners as to what is most important to be done right away. Callahan replied that it is staff’s opinion that nothing can be done except have nice conversations given the current ordinances. Callahan thinks the Committee should proceed to the next part, don’t issue licenses and work on the ordinances. The difficulty is that if we proceed further and attempt to tag then for operating without a license, the City would need to seek legal advice to see what activities are actually in violation of the licensing ordinance. If you read the licensing section. Section 5, there is no mention of boats. However, the license should be denied as they are in violation of current ordinances. The ordinances were passed and a "working arrangment" has been made which focused on the number of boats and landscaping. This never had any authority. There still are a number of violations which can be pointed to but they are hard to make concrete, e.i. landscaping. Gaffron asked if there would be an intent that the Council adopt a resolution denying a license to formalize some of these reasons. Some years there have been denial reolutions while other years there weren't. Callahan stated resolutions could be passed by City Council if it were stated in writing that license requirements have or have not been met. MINUTES OF THE LAKE USE COMMITTEE - August 12, 1992 Jabbour stated he personally has more concern with the activites on the site and the effect of the site on the neighborhood than landscaping. Jabbour added that it was his understanding that the reason some of the marinas were nor licensed is because they didn't have any business and couldn't pay the fees. Debbie Breneman said that was ridiculous and the City didn't licc'nse them because they didn't. Jabbour added he was just brainstorming. Schroeder asked to hear from the marina operators, presuming they were aware of certain violations such as landscaping. Debbie Breneman stated they were not aware of these violations and that Gaffron had been out to the marina for a walk-through at one time. She received a letter stating they had added hardcover but that had not been done. The City also gave them a permit for docks. Jabbour referred to a time when there were discussions concerning the fence and vines with Debbie's father. Debbie stated she had permission to keep the fence down as long as trees were planted which had been done. Jabbour said there were landscaping issues which had been going on for several years. Debbie Breneman asked what these issues were and has only received summary statements. She added there is no additional hardcover at the marina. Orono had dug up part of the marina for a sewer project and this is exactly as Orono left it. She has asked the City for 2 years about the bushes to be replaced and grass replanting. Four small bushes had been planted but have all died. Jabbour referred to the Comprehensive Plan that specifically does not allow the sale of boats in marinas. This Council wants to change that. There are certain faults in the code and need to be changed. Mark Breneman stated that Gaffron had been out and went over what reeds to be done for improvements. They are working on this. At the scune time, the City says some things are unsightly so can't be done. For example, trailers parked between the racks and road are legal to have but this is unsightly so should be moved. Calculations on storing winter boats have changed and the method of determining the required space for winter boat storage is not necessarily accurate. He feels it should be back to the basis of how it was done for the last 20 years or redo everything. Callahan and Jabbour agreed that everything needs to be redone. Callahan said the discussion at this time was whether to grant the licenses, not change ordinances. Someone has to decide if the marinas have or have not met the requirements. The City staff is interpreting and enforcing the requirements. If the staff cannot tell whether they are in violation or not, then advice from a lawyer may be necessary. It is not possible for Council to take any action unless: 1) an attorney is asked to determine if a violation exists, 2) they are in violation, or 3) they are not in violation. In Callahan's opinion, a license MINUTES OF THE LAKE USE COMMITTEE - August 12, 1992 Beth Whittaker further discussed the issue of sub-leasing. She feels it would be important that the owner be allowed to do this on the property but the owner should be held responsible for the activities of that sub-lease. She would agree that if there is an increase in parking demand because of charter boats» the requirements should be met. Currently the LMCD licenses the operation of charter boats so there is already some regulation on how this is done. Jabbour added he had no confidence with the LMCD. Whittaker again said, "Don't eliminate having a sub ­ contractor come in to operate." Regulate bu+" don't eliminate sub-contracting. Jabbour said it was important that one person tied to the property owner would be the responsible person. Kelley asked if the next time they met they could begin reviewing the ordinance line by line. Callahan said they couldn't because the ordinance as it stands is useless. The concept of separating the licensing is a useful way to go about revisions. Schroeder asked if there was any precedence. Callahan noted the LMCD does not have their licensing tied into land use. Debbie Breneman disagreed that the LMCD ties their licensing to land use. Who enforces the ordinances is not the concern of the Committee at this point. Jabbour stated the Police Department is already involve-i in licensing the marina such as for searching activities of a Bass Tournament. There was disagreement about the Police involvement in such a tournament. Gaffron stated that ^ Bass Clubr for a Bass Tournament would apply to the LMCD and the u etiy.- Whittaker confirmed this as the^ are currently involved in -'“this process. She said the LMCD and Water Patrol are contacted. The Water Patrol then contacts other necessary people. •f ^ Jabbour stated that others were laughing at the confusion of the Committee but they are trying to focus on relevant issues. Dunn agreed they should take some notes and start developing the ordinance. He had been at the last 2 or 3 meetings and wants to see things moving forward. He has invited members to stop by and visit so the ordinances can be developed and the Committee will understand what the marina owners are doing. Callahan asked if separating the activities and land ordinances is the way to proceed. Schroeder stated the what he thought they were trying to currently regulate was the relative level of intrusiveness via land ordinances. Callahan agreed this is the mechanism. Therefore, Schroeder felt the Committee should go toward regulating the business rather through the setbacks, etc. Kelley asked if the marina section would have its own land use section. Other members thought the land use would stay as a separate section. Kelley envisioned the land use at the marinas requiring variances to general land use ordinances so why not develop their own standards within the licensing process. Callahan felt it should not be within the licensing process since the land use regulations tend to be ambiguous. Enforcing comes 4 MINUTES OF THE LAKE USE COMMITTEE - August 12, 1992 down to judgement and nf'gotiations in the gray areas ol the code and is very cumbersoiuc. There should, however, be land use regulations that relate to marinas. Some of the areas that may require regulation, such as parking spaces, may be beyond the knowledge of the Committee and criteria will have to be established. The configuration of tie land may determine some of the requirements. A site plan or survey will probably need to be on file designating parking spaces. Jabbour asked if this wouldn't be part of the future licence and the owner's r ponsibility. Callahan agreed and pointed out that site plans currently exist in some form with most of the marinas. Callahan suggested that Gaffron work on an outline coverino areas the licensing ordinance might cover. This could inclu the areas previously discussed. Full and complete language would not be beneficial at this point. Schroeder thought input should also come from the marinas. Whittaker pointed out there was already a list developed of activities the marinas are involved in. Now it should be decided how this list will be incorporated into the ordinances. Whittaker asked if the Committee had any problems with any of the activities listed as she would like to be involved in the discussion of those concerns. Callahan stated that the list which was developed is not uo say an item is good or bad but only to consider activities which may occur at the various marinas. Dunn commented that he saw the Committee as having issues for whic.. they need to gather knowledge, not history, about the operation of the marinas for both existing and pocential activities. He has suggested in the past that Committee members visit marinas to gather information. Each season operates and functions differently at different marinas. There are some passive marinas that only rent slips while others are full service with a variety of activities. Callahan commented on sub-contracting as it has been the subject of discussion a number of times. He said he brought it up as a way of controlling the operation but was not committed to a decision. Jabbour suggested visiting marinas outside of Orono so there is a variety, larger and smaller. The next meeting was scheduled for August 26 followed by a September 9, 199T meeting. 1 I ¥ iA 9 /yvy^/AJ^;! “Seif.. /|. . . - . — AD, .3 . PiVO^lT^ti U f f 5 .V.(V/^D. ____ /ItDr ____ .S . A, /^ac/l X ( 1. Accc:^s C. U(UHT7MG . 06/*. M<;f, . _ I ifs. p •_ottt>i?<u.y ce/'Titiv'- H • t>Kl4. tt*>'i‘>ycc«'ST«y»MA;Krr I. tVt>f STt)/:A€.r Su«\. ^ |f4T ^r etLCjj AoT SiTe y^tb- ci7eL ,/0 . A".7_i>_ , B <-{k^€ . iS-e-i ._____ j_STtkiAt«oU tT* . . H/it^eo\/trg ____ Ci_!T7tor/Cf __ . S _ . / / iJfiAf ^^(^e __ :o^D_J2r r^cfTs fhfl-Uc^^0 ^eMi*rt_ &ML€S. COi^fiLlA K. X X X. X X feil i: X X X X.; X,. X M X X :x X X X ;x: a-'x x:X VA>^f€< efr^-r Lie -\ Ix X X X X % :ki /toj’ ; •* // 'ue\ '‘jC* , y V, ,_Jifi J 30;■Vj7jrA,P. Pt**'*'- V^'y^WLD ArC€A^ -/iSn, ;i cjfrn L'D ^ w4:i>ArvAi X,:: X V /7f75>., (]^r/v«g I Mlc V^— . V, ""w 7a-‘' f n-;r t . fV^A^fTAfMriL. > i *ii ■y'“ ~^nwiS wve-*y- '• "'\ /\ -X I: -—•. 4 _ \ It ---------ij X'x: “/ycMr ?”‘I /\ V^$4»PC A-«P“fi'>rr**- •‘•J /K»© C^^rrpc^.* jL<r#AJ^‘^Cf r #’ VL ) *;/►••• /ifoirM ■»j . X x_ X aj9tf a r ..• I_X;... -X_..('2S>C'‘"".-3 Y)*^ (t^W>AI/0?t» /-< »- >■'- ^ ' yooy- vt-" V (ajOT^ f fUTfi/i ''• r-ZerOA ^»Avr V __(JYi :x(P3 ____' ./i^ : - f(z firr t ■1 i ^ I iiA To;Lake Use Committee From Date: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator August 11, 1992 Subject: License Review, Lakeside Marina List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J May 28, 1992 Letter LMCD Letter & Minutes, July 11-12, 1992 1992 Application May 1992 Letter from Neighbors at 3332 North Shore Drive Inspection Notes/Site Plan 3/25/91 Current Summer Parking Layout Landscape Plans Slip/Boat Storage Licensing History Winter Boat Density Calculation (suggested formula) Handwritten Notes (basis for these recommendations) Discussion Lakeside Marina was last licensed as Chaska Marina in 1983. During years that the City did review licenses, they were withheld from Chaska/Maxwe11 Bay/Lakeside Marina because of issues related to impact on neighboring property owners, use of non-adjacent parcels, screening and landscaping issues, number of boats on the property, and other issues. The May 28 letter to Lakeside Marina spells out a number of standards with which the City expected Lakeside to comply before the 1992 license would be issued. Namely, these are: 1. Reduce to a level of 98 boats on land and/or water (76 slips, 22 "other boats" on the property) per prior licenses. 2. Resolve or agree to resolve or rectify the following . issues: a. Screening b. Stormwater runoff management controls c. Hardcover d. Parking inadequacy e. Commercial use at 3350 North Shore Drive. 3. Eliminate land storage of trailered boats for on-demand launching if such use is occurring. 4. Submit a revised application indicating compliance with prior license boat densities. In addition. Lakeside was advised of the potential ban on the use of unprotected styrofoam. License Review, Lakeside Marina August IX, 1992 Page 2 It is clear to staff that Mr. Dunn has absolutely no intent to reduce the number of boats on the property to 22 as the marina was licensed for in 1983. There are approximately 60 boats on the site this summer. The license and zoning codes do not provide a basis for determining how many boats are allowed on land in either summer or winter. The limitations on number of "other boats on the property" in the summer and the number of "winter stored boats" apparently became a line item on the license forms in the late 1970's without any code basis. If we deny Lakeside a license based on "having too many boats", I don't have a code section that defines what is the correct number of boats. This all leads to the conclusion that rather than tying a license to the number of boats on land, we should, as the Lake Use Committee has previously discussed, tie the license into a site plan that defines winter and summer boat storage and parking locations, as well as providing for emergency access and safety concerns (in addition to buffer areas such as landscaping and yard areas, which are well defined). Staff has designed a possible formula for defining winter storage boat numbers, if the Committee feels compelled to tie the licensing to a number rather than a site plan. This formula simply starts with the entire lot area, subtracts the required landscape areas, existing buildings, and the area needed for winter parking and access; then defines that 50% of the remaining space can be used for winter boat storage at an p.verage of 350 s.f. per boat, which yields a specific number of boats. The formula yields 78 winter stored boats for Lakeside Marina, comparable to the 80 winter stored boats previously licensed. By comparison. North Shore Drive Marina, with half again as much property, ends up with 122 winter stored boats, an increase above the 82 they have been licensed for in the past, but perhaps more in keeping with their site capabilities given the existence of the dry stack units which compensate for topography problems they would otherwise have. Staff Recommendation Staff finds questionable value in further denial or withholding of a license for Lakeside Marina given the history of activity on the site, given the existing site conditions which from a legal non-conformity standpoint the City has limited ability to force into greater compliance, and given a code that in many respects is idealistic but not functional for d<^aling with existing non-conforming situations nor perceived density and use concerns. License Review, Lakeside Marina August 11, 1992 Page 2 Denial of the license without action to stop the business from operating will accomplish nothing. The legal battle to force a ceasing of operations will likely be expensive, time consuming, and point out the limitations of the current codes. I would not attempt to predict the outcome of such action, but would encourage the City Attorney's close involvement in any decision to deny the license. Rather, at least for the sake of discussion, staff is going to recommend approving a license for Lakeside Marina for 1992 (and perhaps for prior years), listing conditions of approval that the City feels are appropriate, whether or not such conditions are currently being met. Then, having granted a license with specific conditions, if those condtiions are not met they have at least been formally told to the licensee, and we can then find him in violation of license conditions and should be on better ground to take future legal action if necessary. Again, I think we are at a point of getting the City Attorney's direction. Those conditions include; 1.Licenses issued for 77 slips in the water, with no breakdown as to whether such slips are for rental, service, or other uses. 2,No on-land spaces will be allowed for boats stored for on-demand launching or intended as rental slots for lake use. 3.The maximum permitted total summer boat density on the property, including wet slips and on-land storage of boats stored for any purpose is 136 boats (76 in the water, 60 on land*). See notes. Exhibit J 4.The maximum permitted winter boat density (includes on- land storage and boats stored in the lake under deicing measures) is 78 for the current season. Maximum winter boat density for any given year is 78. Licensee shall provide to the City a winter boat storage site plan prior to October 1, 1992. 5.Licensee shall provide an updated summer and winter parking plan that includes documentation of how charter boat customer parking is handled. The parking plan shall define the 68 spaces required for summer parking and any other spaces available for overflow parking, and shall define the 14 required winter parking spaces. "1 License Review, Lakeside Marina August 11, 1992 Page 3 6.Licensee is advised that a license for the 1993 license year will not be issued until the following requirements have been met: a.Agree to an acceptable time frame for completing plantings required per the attached landscape plan which identifies plantings required in the past but which have never been completed. b.Likewise, licensee shall agree to a time frame for development of a drainage detention pond, including regrading of the property as necessary to maximize the portion of hard surface areas flowing to that pond. 7.Licensee shall remove all boats docked at the property at 3350 North Shore Drive that may be used commercially at any time during the year. S.Licensee shall not store “winter storage" boats within any defined landscape area, and shall endeavor to locate only low profile boats along North Shore Drive, Isv iuL. /y f, \ V li ^04, O O * 1 * CITY of ORONO |^■<•\ 4i.- ' Municipal Offices Post Office Box 66 Cr> ^ B®y* Minnesota 55323-0066 May 28, 1992 Lakeside Marina, Inc. 3324 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Attn: James Dunn RE: Licensing Update Dear Mr. Dunn: Thank YOU for submitting your 1991 and 1992 commeroial marina licans aoplications, received by this office on April 2, 1992. A^so a’ckno^wledged is receipt of your check in the amount of $688.00. The City in its previous licenses has land and/or water. Your current application proposes 77 . is wtfer a “a 146, "other boats" on the property, for a maximum overall boat density of 217. In addition to the 98 boats Previously mentioned, the City i^ • ho r>a«;h has licensed you for 80 winter storage boats in pla ?i??d^/f^h?st^iie”Ynter^t?r”d\^^ts so that in any event^you Ard.“^orir%"\ii:erirg “hfri?ola\\rb^^^^^^^ summer use as well. rn KnIt )NK -4717.157 • K\.\ - 47.^4(510 J Lakeside Marina May 28f 1992 Page 2 under its present sp^ce's^'^yo^ propose ^0"" ha^'vr^s to described^in the earlier paragraph with reduced to 98 of the type p,vrina the winter storage season.appropriate adjustments made durig combined number of C^Lequently, you 8^ thirty (30) days boats on the proper y t first step to obtaining a ?ice\"s"e":ltho°utl^^^^^^^ it is illegal to operate. f - -------------------- The City is also greatly concerned over and the large number of season, as I noted to you in on your Pi'operty on^ are; of concern which has my letter of May 22, 1992. boats ^n the extreme southeastSLn noted to you this spring, the boats n t^^ partially corner of the ^r\aht-o^^^ cannot be allowedwithin the County Road 51 J^^ht of way, j^^^eo^er, the City is to continue nor be repeated next ^ you main* ained on concerned that the sheer effect eliminated fire the property during ^ss should a hazardous situation lanes or any easy f letter of May 22, your curreii- develop. AS I noted in the^®^ even attempt to conform storage arrangement does not appear u with parking requirements. fh,at?nt^°df/re1ard%1 ”rept^^^^^^^^ season . There are a number of f-s in whreh^your^ to be in violation or fails t discussed and solved requirements. These and you can be permitted to before a license can e ^ These issues, many of which Icontinue operations the future. ine discussed with you on March 25, include. 1.inadequacy of screening and landscaping along your east lot line. 2.Coi-cerns about storm '^®^f^^g ””ndpointf^^You should from a quantity sto^ water managementr.sve;.“ShT.ns““ *• the future. 3.The degree of hardcover on P^®^P^°P®^g^^oreTin^r^ the the 30' wide grassy str^p^^__^ should anticipatethe 30* You should anticipate tfe^CitTwfll be "rMSesting future reductions rn hardcover on the property. Lakeside Marina Kay 28, 1992 Page 3 4.Screening along the west lot of noted that some boats were stored 1^55 the fence line on the west side, and generally l®ss than the required 10' setback from ^ lines, regardless of the extent of hard surface. 5.The number of available automobile parking spaces appear' to be significantly less than those required Ifori ccde standpoint as well as from a praot cal viewpoint. G. • n ^T^TTioertv at 3350 North ShoreCommercial use of the prop y ^ . +-ime that you Drive will not be condoned unta.a. such time Y apply for Ld are granted the appropriate approvals. 7.The use of styrofoam floats for the ■3°=’'= ^as been a h“ €‘y Srfnra “n-^rdinan\°e “ t^-ba^ tJ^^Ssf o Finally, the City is informed ^hat /°u are^en^ j^nsiSef storage of trailered ^^°'i^e''essentia 1 ly identical to dry- such a se and operation to dissolution No. 938, which stacking and to be a ^^olation o _ y " buoys or drv-stack limits the number of authorized slips, Hf-s, Slip^to thHumber provided in prior years' licenses. As you are aware, the City is ‘'Ma^in ”'"^ AnI \^t’'is marinas in the City, inclu ^ gg their actual effect reviewing the various general or Take Use Committee, which Vr "th\-crm'a?i\\^ee \r.lt rr^?S:nS^S?^%%cta^\%fn rl^lrd to -^-and launching, “boat clubs", dry-stacking and charter boat operations. I will repeat not’cotntlnTalfy «ai"i^ed bLts® related to o’n-demand n„“ber'^of boa “ts illowld application requests more than double the on the property per previous licenses- A 1992 license cannot be granted to cation conditions are rectified, o/for meeting previous boat ^"Ungidored until the current1991 or prior years will not be consiccr number of boats issues are resolved. And, quite aside from ^he^numbei^^^^ favlTo"be “d^'airwrt\^Va “iris^^^^^^^^^^^^ t°he*f“n“aran:T^=is?ff you do not have a license, you will not be able to operate. % > Lakeside Marina May 28, 1992 Page 4 I would note for the record that at their April 27 Council issued licenses to those marina operations in the City which were in compliance. We will be glad to discuss these matters further. MPG/lsv cc; Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Adminrstrator Ron Moorse, City Administrator Orono City Council City Attorney, Tom Barrett Lake Minnetonka Conservation District WATER STRUCTURES COMMITTEE July 11, 1992WATE B. Lakeside Marina, Maxwell Hay, Orono ^ Thibault said the application for renewal of the Lakeside Marina multiple dock license is in order except for receipt of the as-built survey. It is her opinion that the surveyor is the cause of the delay as a result of phone contact with the survey­ or. The survey is needed as a result of the docks hav'ing been brought back to 200’ and configured per the approved site plan. MOT.LON: Hurr moved. Rascop seconded, to recommend approval of the renewal of the Lakeside Marina multiple dock license without change, subject to receipt of the as-built survey. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. Hurr mentioned a dock which the applicant has built on the Crystal Bay side of the property. Thibault said he has been advised he will need a commercial license for the dock and that it must meet Orono’s zoning regulations. C. Roger Wikner, Way/at.a Bay, W.iyzata. Thibault reported Wikner said he did not pl.an to renew his multiple dock license as he would have less than five boats. In doing the annual boat count. Thibault observed 3 cruisers and 2 jtt ski is at his dock. She will contact Wikner advising he does need a 1icense. 3. Wayzata Yacht Club, Site 2, Wayzata Bay, Wayzata The committee received a new site plan for Site J. replacing the proposed platform shown on the 11/5/86 site plan with a smaller 6’ x 40 se.isonal make reatl\ dock. _ Scott Spaeth. Commodore, Wayzata Yacht Club, e.xplained the purpose of the new platform. The Lake Minnetonka Sailing School will use the dock for launching its boats during the season. He said it is an improvement over what was originally planned and provides a safer way of launching the boats. There will e no boat storageon the dock itself. :.i fh,» Markus brought up the zoning on the property. Be s.iid the propertv is zoned residential, limiting it to townhouse familv units. Markus submitted a copy of the deed ‘ on the property. He said approval of the new site ''V’ ° , amount to allowing a commercial venture on a piece property. Spaeth responded that the WYC is a non-piofit organi Mar'^.us saMl the aaitins school is « Markus added that in addition to the zoning question there ‘'‘■'‘'’%;ar.\,'’s!:i<V’^.e'"v/ha"an aeree.nent ••vUh the city for a CM. r„,. thcrl's^ or the property and the use ^‘ ^ ^ I ed in the city Resolution. Urathwol ^^ ble to have a commercial marina -.u ^ different cial. The LMCU may use the word , V review ng [h^ '-st7;^toi;%'hL‘d;iorVui:’Vte:.- l t . —-- ^ WATER STRUCTURES COMMITTEE July 11, 1992 Hurr noted the license approvals on Site I and Site 2 were based on there being a valid CUP with the City of Wayzata. MOT I ON: Hurr moved. Rascop secorl"d, to recommend apfiroval of the revised plan for the Wayzata ^ .cht Club Site 2. conditiotied on a valid CUP existing between the Yacht Club and the City of Wayzata. and subject to meeting all LMCD dock license Codes with no boat storage on the platform. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. 4. Styrofoam in Dock Construction (Orono Ordinance) The committee received a copy of an orditiance proposed by the City of Orono prohibiting the use of non-encased styrofoam as a dock flotation device. Babcock suggested adding "including but not limited to" to the last line of Section 1. Items I and 5. Hurr and Rascop indicated an interest in nilopling a similar ordinance. G r a t hwo1 said the LMCD should get the benelit of Orono's public hearings before making a decision. Thibault reported White Bear Lake Conservation District ha.s no ordin.ince. but it did establisli a policy requiring replacement of slvrofoam dock.s over a period of lime as a condition of ap­ proval for dock licenses. Hurr said she believes the 1/1/9J date in the Orono Ordi­ nance is too soon. She would prefer a longer period of time for the dock owners to comply. Babcock and Markus thought a three year conversion date would be reasonable with a restriction prohibiting use of tton-encased styrofoam for new construction of structures on Lake Minnetonka. There was discussion of the use of styrofoam in other struc­ tures on the lake such as swimming platforms. The consensus of the committee is that styrofoam, unless encased, should be banned from the Lake. The City of Orono is to be forwarded a copy of this meet­ ing’s minutes, recommending to the Board that LMCD fav^or banning non-encased styrofoam from the lake oji any st ructures placed in the Lake. The committee further recommends the Board approve deletion of 3.a and 3.b in the Ordinance, keeping 3.c requiring elimination of non-encased styrofoam by 1/1/95. 5. Storage of Commercial Watercraft wood Ordinance) at Residential Sites (Orcen- The committee received a copy of the City of Greenwood Ordinance prohibiting the storage of commercial watercraft in R-1 and R-2 residential districts. Babcock no*ed the Ordina'ce does not apF)ly to rental of private dock s|)aces. He also noted the (.'rdinance is basically limited to charter boats by the reference to the watercralt having its own captain and crew. Grathwol said this, aeain. uses the word "commercial" in a context differettt than tlnit used by the LMt.’D. The committee asked staff to forward copies of the Greefiwood ordinance to the other cities and ask for their comments. BOARD MEMBERS David H Cochran. Chair Greenwood Tom Ree*;e. Vice Chair Mound Douglas E. Babcock, Secretary Spring Park J. P. Boswinkel. Treasurer Minnetonka Beach Scott Carlson Minnetnsta Aiben (Bert) Foster Deephaven James N. Grathwol Excelsior JcEllen L Hurr Orono William A Johnstone Minnetonka Duane Marcus Wayzaia George C Owen Victoria Torn Penn Tonka Bay Robert Rascop Shorewood Robert E Slocum Woodland LAKE MINNETONKAiCONSERVAJION DISTRICT w -1- 900 EAST WAYZATA BOULEVARD. SUITE 160 • WAYZATA. MINNESOTA 55391 • TELEHONE 612/473-7033 June , 1992 IV EUGENE R. STROMMEN. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Mr. Jim Dunn Lakeside Marina 3324 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 0 0^ ^ M Dear Mr. Dunn: Enclosed is a letter sent by certified mail on 5/15/92, that was not accepted at your office. The letter was a reminder that the as~built survey is required for your liceiise renewal, as well as a notice of boat storage violations on the west side. We understand that since that time, you have installed some no parking signs and a fence on the west side of the dock section closer to shore. We appreciate your attention to this. Note that a fence is also required on the western dock section further from shore. A no parking sign should also be installed on the west side of the launch well to prevent customers from parking in the setback area. Another item of concern is the metal survey post in the water to mark the 200* property line. This post must be removed as it has been considered hazardous by the water patrol. We wish to remind you that Lakeside Marina is not licensed for off-lake storage of boats that are placed in and out of the water on demand. An inventory of the boats stored at your site will be required prior to the annual inspection to assure compliance. We appreciate the ongoing effort to maintain j'our marina in compliance with the LMCD Code. Sincerely, LAKL MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT ache I ThibauTt Administrative Technician c: J. Hurr, D. Babcock, M. Gaffron, Orono Jwotitv Fifth Annivf^tf^ntv 19^7-1992 Lp . PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, ATTi^CHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY J^UARY 15 OF THE LICENSE YEAR. BUSINESS INFORMATION 1. BUSINESS OR TPJ^E NAl-lE A 1 D ^ M- t ^ .------- Street Address Mailing Address ___ 2. Marina Phone \ ^ PROPERTY INFORMATION Date Property Acquired Office Phone arv-g f oRo^o FliiARCE OFFICE 1311300000 01 QEH 344.00 Marina Controls Property by:fee ownership 3.Names of abutting lakeshore property owners: (North/West)__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _/Vl. (Name + Address; (South/East)^fJ<7 b-fU. (Name + Address) Other Property Owners that may be affected by Marina's operation: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ /V//?_ _ _ _ _I_ _ _ _- “ (Name + Address) ' (Attach sheet if necess?xy) . . .. . .. . 13. Boats Dry-Stacked for Lake Use 5er'/ice Rental Boata Rental Slip/Space Total Boa Boa ta a) Inside Buildings b) Outside on Racks c) Outside - other means Total'Boats Dry-Stacked 14. Total Watercraft Availability Units (Add 12 & 13) 15. Other Boats on Premises a) Transient Boats (repair/service) b) New boats for sale (inventory) c) Used boats for sale (inventory) Inside Buildina Outside Storage Tota?. IS. Winter Storage on Premises Inside'^Buildina Outsic^Storac a) Transient boats (repair/service) b) Contract storage(customer's boats) c) Inventory (new & used boats) i T Total /HO + CFF-STRZET PARKIL’G .RZQUIRZ.MZ:^T3 Summer Parking a) Retail sales/service customers 8 spaces minimum (+1 per each 300s.f. over 1,000 s.f.) *= b) Boating customers 6 spaces per 10 Availability Units (.6 X (line 14)) = c) Launching ramp c”Stomers 10 spaces minimum per ramp = cars cars cars Total Spaces 18. Winter Parking ^ Minimum 2 spaces, or retail spaces per li.ne 16a above = •cars LANDSCAPING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS Ordinances require establishment and maintenance of minimum green areas and natural screening along all Marina property ines: 10 ft. front yard, 10 ft. side yard and a lakeshore yard of 10% or the lot depth, not less than 10 ft. and not more than 75 ft. 19. Describe in detail the plantings (trees, shrubs, grass, vines, flowers, etc.) and other improvements proposed to be installed this coming license year; r 7 c rr^ ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application: 1. 3. 4. A CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY (Per LMCD requirements) indicating the boundaries of the marina property and the authorized dock use area, the location of all structures, storage areas, docks, slips, buoys, launching ramps, pumps and all existing facilities, all changes from the previous season, and anv changes proposed for the duration of the currant apulica-tion. ^ /l^ A DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLAN/^or all setback arias Showing existing ajid proposed location and sizes of aix urees, shrubbery, grass areas and other foliage or landscaping features. A copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPLICATION. A COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION FEE according to the current City fee schedule. Initial Application @ $300.00 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Renewal Application 8 $200.00 >'2_ - - - - - - - Each Boat Unit (Line 12) @ $2.0 0/ea Each Boat Unit (Line 13) 0 $1.00/ea - - - :2^' TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION 5 LATE FEES - Renewals - Applications for renewal of licen shall be made no later than January 15 of the new license year. The City shall not accept renewa 1 l^i^cense applications received after J anua ry a^pplication is accompanied by a late fee of $50.0(^ When a complete application is received, this referred to the Marina Committee for review. The City Council will" review the Marina Committee re^^endation ^d thereafter pass upon the applicatic^^^/S^J^d-odc. OSe‘"oNLY OPON APPROVAL OP THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Marina License application, and agrees and authorizes City of Q rr\ A KJ (T- I signed If Date Wrr/ 7 r ^ ^ 11 \ca ; '1 May 28, 1992 UjL - •*C a C«h )i j ; ( i[1E[10^may 2 9 1992Ms. Jean Mabusth Zoning Administrator City of Orono 1335 S. Brown Road Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323RE: Lakeside Marina Dear Jean: The boating season is here, and with it come the recurring complaints regarding Lakeside Marina. 1. Boats (service boats, customers, renters?) are parked in the setback on the west side of the marina dock. It has been our understanding that this space is not to be used by anyone for any reason. 2. The required no parking signs and fence have not been put up on the west side of the marina decks to deter short/long term parking. Consequently, boaters (as well as nic.ir.c personnel) are using in the area. 3. There is a post in the water (this is its second season) on the west side of the marina's dock that is an absolute hazard to boaters even though it has an orange float on its top (which is barely above water). 4. There are so many boats on the marina property that trailered and cradled boats are parked over and in the plantings along the west fence. The intended screening effect is lost and the plantings may not survive. 5. Due to lack of marina parking, custome.'’s are parking on County Road 51. Prior to the sewer lift station installation, there was a no parking sign in front of our property. It was removed during the construction and not replaced. The County agreed about two weeks ago to reinstall the sign, but it hasn ’t yet been done, if you are able to expedite any action, feel free to pursue the sign. We have been and will continue to be in at least weekly contact with Rachel Thibault from the LMCD, and the Water Patrol has been informed about the post. And this probably won't be the only letter to you during the summer of '92. Sincerely, Marcia J. Schoeneman 3332 North Shore Drive Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 ' Sandra E. Ramberg ' ! Ir • I • ••'• ;• I . * ^ K. f r ? r :% t^*i C*r- - - - SI A/rV ?*%V '” f'K 3 -- j \/r VO EXHIBIT Hw/. 2/2. C/7asAa. MN 55318 (612) 448^75 jdi 9ak ^'^ L® / r; •*' ^ 4 A o^a *^Ar> ‘ V/ )^I w 'S J V/1 a *0 S»B4//<«^ MCr. ,'' IV ■gfetfa: T^r-T •: /^ /oc^LeD <• f ^ “s ' ^ <N ^ ^irmuD I #. ■ ^ t '•u . 1981 :'"'ciTvoTcll!Sl! • • » ■ • ] Sr' IS I iATD 'i.CZUJ2b scruoct I toy ^ (w.. ^ c^"*; isJkp ;*5r- r:^2rV. liRMi W4TXP, CUtyATloK u4i *y^ Dm* vie t .1 I •; 1 4 1 i•■|■ . 1 ■ !.1 1 * • • ^ 1 •• ' 1 •■•;■ 1 L-. • 1 . i .1 *4 •\mi»r >U4 ?>• :- 75" 15 ; ; :Bc^Ti^i I : STOWrC i :' i I ! V ? • •• 1.. • I '•' > ■ *- 0 ^1^^ • : ;i ■• *•.» • .• ••J| S#AT AWTO . •* . *1 ’ *• %' * fflttKi*- s#<tr* 1 • TUCO O CU^Tii^ SH«wl6 Itf AfflUA* M DOCif TO Accoioc^^ 3 couMit 6o«r5- ^ PctMkV jjcr TO <XIC KiJWU ’i-ttjUtC’ -f C^tfTf • 6KW ’? ^HJl^ Ttl ;j 24.* tW HCWf^ t9€ TO ffiS*tib.rrt titf t^99H€JL . •• '*'**j»:v.;ni: . i» - 4,? <J£^ /i J • i ^' r "jsV = '»-wC •V F»rv•••[1 ^ r ^—-T : I'Ij urr 1im*^ • ■ fci * 1 • #*f '•• #•« ^ 7 *» • • • 9 1 1 • • ^ . *'•I fIIVM i"** *r . *t • • 2 f • : ’i 1t4k m 3 • •••# 4*vtr^'* r •* *• •ri✓^Vi>'«.*»»• 1-7^ >» >nuj -- rp /*1^ *7 •J* i*•. > ^ • • • e _ -r--.rwwmm\'%90TB ^1 '/■*■ ___ A •P>r*>«4 >.U uTj * COD!"1 » A— ~ • • • *---------® r h-it’:Wfmr.tMnwman. k —•?• f-'ne>-L'»Lin! K w V- . * 9 ^ • *• . » . ^ . 1 . . « »l«* •». 0 . « • « • • • •• «'• «A W* • »*»ii •• • tfV J*« • •« i >'s AIvTw.' - r- r "62- st/rtT <*Z Sfc<i« _ _ /f " //2 S.tnA — At. D'oxr-Cisjf^ Iv —— % • ir-.. !.'■ ' > h.>r.¥ !r r.‘- p. . ii —■f ■w • • • QBWnr^i JMT jw«» '77 i ---------------------------------------------------------------------- f %i. /f68 - ^ S i r 5 *lkUTA . /I7I " 92 S>J«: ^•7“* •■ jL‘r~ -I*.?/: }^'-l ■ 7t C4 ’P; f^lT. ' 1.S 1^6 1577-- 75' SM« i8vs«*; < n-»/f-F4 /S^»> 1ESm>«m« I^U^Crt/ex itfCMiaM. 4#*f ____ 4*-'r ^i^'i. t • i ♦ f lignl•>r»^M C*€> rr . fer" * • •;' v>I. /?7^ ^ AJeAJ-C4^**Wl/V4«^ ;_ . _ . « . A Ci^^{ >• / f •* , A4S ^ '•'•*4 4. ...........Jr.»_ tf- <’€. ____________________________________ a’ •v« I i rA w'-'i***-»f.J: •>*»/»<’it'-»v. VA< A^T_J i.i-4#in»fV*<t<^s fV*’ ■K- % « • # 4. i A-V S>?/ */ 0^- ?ft-. :-' :fff H'-,‘ e*’'' .A. I v\;-l ^^^ ’ -» ■r-i P>;;v;i .. <niifi4^'> I _ . . aiiBiUlidki. .^1 A , ■ J.\..i:.4>i!r* iCj et4~ SUPS /M j)(m ^rAcic O n60 ■>. K:^.r. ^S imuMwtt.pS’ MAyv»'' 3 <■.*■■%',:, ^'r; l^lt 96' _“ (L(A4t^Ai% ----------r\t^rrr-*-;—; 70 /t/O /4/ f#e*vi ‘-ti. ■ *'r 1^ f«*tt»«if' l»3K<h«W««R fl/A< •I'f l9> /M«nc* m >i TjHT5iiWr “ T to ^80 __ 1 22 1 &0 ■80 i 1 2*2- 1 S3>60 ; 'vV ; . ««■• -• ■i: •f. ■'m .;?% i- ■ f. ,. ' 'r>M i*'.v 1«^..vieSf5»< " • " ’•■ '4- I '''*dStSJUuuaA^s*<i >/ £Ay«K«k5aY- ISSLStJV* 3iaLJBbmu^i« (hSL-S&fJoaK d'» di£UUfAT-Jl9* i«/;» OWJr j»o« V «1 1 •rl .f«- i.* « • * • ••1 •hmuim i # -4. ' m fi ■f 5*? K f T- r. zt^€ SrPOHf*F.^f*r^L< 92-roo i:C .............. s 77 V» /o VVi3o _io .K -.-•.-x->ro-------- r^.yeo IAi^ ZO >7/ O -♦ ^2, sac r-iopiO 8 ’7I,'>90. 2..» ?4o « •• C s“r >'/oo> ...................................^H,HUO ■7 lr7tO -/(, ‘/6o-*-60,-liO ■ Mil • ►.. " /V.rAK^n X AHU 1 ____________ ^.Qyji’^p^rL^C^SLi^S^o.i ;? V.4930 y.s-* 27 ,i/^r -r 3>s&4pS-»egcg-j ^^^-T? ■:■ ,'1 /jktuesibi^ H. 1 > i M d h&, 5'- I- in % y s?f (T) -/5-^wrs /Bev/e^osnEny ^orUt -*nt« f^SZA^ /9^1 Uc^^m\ *?V A^ -7^ ^tAAS //j *t7+t? ^Z Tr/ r ir^Tcr* '7:2 ^it‘ • Ustriiii,^ 'TTW' trrv4 /ffZ itrmt- 7^-*^22, ** *?S> Bca*^ ^ l/j# i>Jo»o>T ris»^ 5 A /rlCeNlg* iSPA^z t*\€<r /'jvt*^^<eii . }H HA^f^O A^7^v•^r 7?/Ajr/H#»v>i5evc . u’ . ,-.•, •*-■ “ ’ ■■•• •' .«V’ /^Kiy ! 4 :^wv»c»*r-/ /3-TV Y i^ATZS , "QrA'f^F ^'jucP; i^E VtC 7 /aJ ZTOCAf "T^i^ /''^2/Ai^ AX: - pir>*i As 2a £4>att IaG iJoA^TS A<:.'i. ’yy^fZ4f I’-^'Jt £,&&■*'* C» S .^' /A< ^ 4iv>A^ A Cfc ^ff^tC-AT Z' 'f'’" Z, w-»; 7'*• *• ' /J ;:“-s ;■•*■'I ■ • • • • ^ f:u ✓ j ■ "V i/'t~ Z • •' f-' '*■ *■ v **:-^1 •- ! .'• ''V- ' i ** fjr "fTO p^(^ T'4{r^ ^^l^ pA'j(: AiCf^ ^5ry»'i J ?.* , ii'v b- brL. ir pss^^g' 7 l/«»t»jr«_ x>ewi t ry I K% f r' t, .J-:4‘’' (>3 ur-}$sf^ /fs TO C^^i& ^tytcr^ Uc»rAm ^<?AJfArU. tMOL4L^ .SCfeA^TO /ic/.T Bfcs (j/0 ^14^ /i/uy X Do/'-V fr i^iirL tir ^4^ CiO^^f^^^TO ^ <utTj^Lm- .. /-l.A'i’ajA .rfeV3/>-^C- TO pt/A»<tr7i?0 /^tas^A'T&vy fcjir>k 4^0 £oat^ ^/rSf/a/ f/»..^ • /^Na>/ ,’vVNi^' i *^44t / * wCGTK^ -r 2> <*AAX^//Vj<5» /C^V/D ''HUfs^fC AffPtcA^ fter^e^'W iHO ^.-^'De? -*■ 30 /a/5»^« TUc “7^// £u0UU^ ^ O/^ 5 7W/2fU ^C/TIIDC ^Aj / 4^ ,|S /AJ S^AKA^Mfvi . Ii&»CCt4JS/p/si -TA«CK2^ /5S~ €-oA*^ dA/ Acu A^\:^ THIS teAlZP^ A Ct)^90£OMU9 yuvff^aAi. A TS* ^vfr£7^<UX /4S cC'/'v»» ^/kier^ TWe* e<^UY JU^CLoujO:, SNoif^ lA/MitU <^4t/rtfo !A*rf^'T t2> />7£ (ju/jur9<^ ^r</, t wLA^f**N If r Wr- i I r -5 « # C«^ Arc. »A * A •no.T' •coAi/Ai <. /*«S»fetNr74ti, #v^/^i? ^VrS nu^^ 20 , 7?i^5c 2oA^ Mv# •Ttt 4d A^O^ ♦ ►*'P TO Ci^AJLi.»if e^MAfTcve. p(rc ;: '-•''/ ; -f:^^ OF- «o4^ STPi*e^^M7T/»e'?*'^ ON Ti*« pw «rwTy^ Cr'i,? ^ -ri»ri " ^a<vr?oA» — ‘Tl!Wkfo«Mft>T /AJ -• Cot^F^'i iJN»r eo47^ CAC7 -- ir'^tf . Ot^» AftASAVi Ui^ /U></^ 2 . S'-*T^ Fo^ Zrr>*tA\A CAi^-si-rc i>o -TO i^CA^OAt ^ ®AA«T7 /O Z-'Q Si ^7 m» ^^TTfiA^a: u^^4Uf ^ y^-«-r5j^. ;A^Cef*r»Oi^ CA»»C ^ fVfAJ<^TT4?AjA-C lAMm^FiL^K ^7PA-»fc> /4£k4A<^^r7* *7^ *n^ . /iili ivvic«oaA«^fAi & /rviT^ 7^ ? tM«iCc CAo^/^^ A fyacm?M¥^ ^/77/j 6» ^/5Trt.N6c ^ro ^/UtxK^ T7^ C^KTp^T CF4T7e^ZFL . I V^ 0*-MJA» ,jUA5‘ To L'5A rtfn<^ /^2 aii?C77o^«5 7?^ J^USi^^JZ^S /W^ T& /JoT~ >5^%^ iisATS /Ai '^^‘W'yv T7P-AW. 4<^/j C IT+ir A^A^# Af^ •fh*^ P^'CirWP^ ^6AHf7^ B^j AtTS T?ff fas:ee(»-Vi . igyrr ^ooin V /^AftucM 7^ , .r-ii-” ’: * !■ >’•* >'p s«wc^] K /M6Lea><ATif V ir usf/i e^ T?^ P^C4€4^m^ /^. SUiL, . /^AACtfjA, I unrvj^2 Hoc cJjls\f>S<~S^ si^ -^Oif At i^ft Jk'CtV'^ 4-1 C4t^^ 2i^^'2. //o -rA^ f^A<T t*->//iT*-./f4iii.Vv<f. Sr'^^S ^fJouL^ /V-4^ajtAiAJtr^ /^ Fft^AiT~ 0^ r^ ^5u'z.^//'i<iy ~/Kcm ta^-w^ /-/iUW*/ /X* ^/70^*w^ TTftA^i^/ -7l> Tr^ y7*r U>t^rm^M# / fZ^f\Ar-mr» 'Tii —htt i5|^a»Tv 4^ A^iT" 5t‘,^//j^ 5-/vt/4w^ ^C5H«. 7j24aj »T7dA4 P^ioOC . A jctt ^ 7ft^^ 7T*^ f^ezy'y^^'no^ 'Xf^^pr /jj?r /r^c^eAZr A’■•<.. I ( I 1 •I dr ^LH^c > r i£i2j£.//4i'; ZrrlLL,A * •• N- t>iW!u.4MHkl f. * S/^C<?S 0 ~/tHS ^/h\j*f )U4>ir fHe Suwimw<-, Ncrr //^ A^ eAjLu-, J l^. /JOT /Ai J7*^7 Ce^UAf*c^ tj^*Tf* 7?^ /K^ / StAlotJ Cil4^^CC»i/^ FA^i^ lr>/MTIiC f/AiCf^C* (LsQ^ TO pfiAJctNCm, A#fl »*7?ar • t/rjuiijuu^v' t*^e^ 70 '7H< . ^4^ F9>ev^ -TTftf' /' Ocjt9^a^ / » • — " — ■ —- -=^— ——^ V w — /a» A^ A»€rl^. y/j AJii, a<€. ^ /’-vt-.v c,» /2o^tr A?-^ , P»JUI*'^C» 732^5/7-A1^^ ^44<Jt^AJC, /^L A . ^ yA //'^ u^/y^ry^ STS/t44e: ujiLu y.t'iiCi'^ *7^'^, v» Avy A 4,;# • ^' n-k ip I- ► k t I /s>sue j t j 'Tr •' 'J z' o A g4r«T “ £^r /JD LAtrr^likX. 'SCJt€e^t'>ii , ^^us'>•-*•» /i^f*(t^'iir^'-» f^' A^-U. A'AA/y L. ■‘.1-4»^'C A*-»tS. -URA<sC, /] -TW**' 7^ /^v© ^ icsT’ y TlHr f^i^T7/'J6 ‘C #Hf A >fi»/C.K'^‘ <?? - to*, ^ThO /■' ^^-'.‘-1 O'^i'. ^ ^ ' *' *'• -iS/'"' *’■ ( / ^'Vntj At;X^T70A^A-V^ S3»-((n? Iaj €T-L , 77H* «r '7>we^7»*J6» . Utt<r 'to .et' k^unJT //^ /f5/ /fe* Wti€-«a /]r\r\\Ctt^f ^iZLtA <t? 7'^?^ t’" i:r /4hJ oc/-t- 3r' -r?f^ C&^r^t^tN^. Ti*^ C f^^-z ^42Jc#/o^ €is ‘A-r' $T0i2A6«? T^ occt-s'^ fJ^ig:rH-^ F T^'' • «f ^I r' ••%i ■ >' -j-V,. -•5 ¥ i .■It s'? * % N • » \KXa^ Tft T>^ / PAfZie./^J 'fVv £iT^9n^ UJt^ /^U^ZJTy •7^Cife-/’c ifrvA^/9'^ /i 4/^C^i.Lmt^T^ ^77^ 5' ^ tA^nr s#ticr /A-S'r^rv^^^ »Ai /f30-3^ ,-aJ i^^*^ 2r<TtH. !^Mr;/.'ft ;*. I/. <tt* '-* 4^ ..-I•' V •»• - V■ . " ,*.— ''■’ --* , « . « <^<c»rJ *p:^/jtfT/C''j '•-^ 7^'r: ^'C. • "f.-ip rw^ 6/^-» «. PiJv \T/f idc S /C'5' — TT-C :.yr^r -fl-C ** ^4 ST SCr^-*- /J4Tt.4£Ci;4/&V pr, op ’ //? p4PPt»M^ . r? ^/U OC^-r/-« ^'/fti^. T^. V'rr..'^: ^c<rP4^.-~:-V ?sl.\ ^ f2^AC(^V% A. i'^Kki^C tCir i- rIri • • • ^ I '•« />Pj vV ■“• w • • # ‘V! ^ce:^'TO -.'*/j *. t.4:''. At'Thhg ♦ • ^;LS?^7**T ‘^ '• • •'ip, ^ ;*r*#‘* .'■<i .W J iJSSuar 1 V/ir CF 3550 AJSt> ^ f A C j^Aj r» fcica4-T7©/k/ <^r^>.Ay^*** ^ •''^ *'•* ft^ A ^fe-'Ti*',t^AJ^^'^ ^*»^ • /^I 'll ArrUC^"'fCt^ ,T^Ac T^ (/~0^ ^r^S.' f -CLw07C<'^C *~‘ ;#v^i2o«/rM(>A**T .S-utr\ 7?^_ /Ar2cAC MA^y icAZZ ^ 'T7*f^ ^ f^zu^ ^ V-^;.'-»WfAT»fcV /^Z6UV^ CK9U:^ti fctv^ct#^ AN r1^ kta »< CC'~lff~ I I tti/1-«< t^Se T7HC *9/# jrSij>^»i^ //a ►HJ A ^‘ryacF^Ap^ T5>oc ^c /^JJ-^/flt^r**C c»*Vj?T*c 8AY ^^fiOT^kta p6j> (Ug9iAC4ft^ poc^ ) . v'lv)^- '. ‘^/*Ac. ^ S- £>oci^ ^A-> f^riL c A I- ■ ‘., -• A. Ufi '■i. pO/l^dc;*/ > fe,04jT TX^ 3r P,ZJ^A.. LcfiC-e ^ -nvf.-*- /'jo-r t** CtAfi. ^iTCAi44.S# U^u€ A t^NTAt, CuirG^ie^f TV^ f«/'^rae>M /S 8^v#4.*4t /^vx»a^ T» fMCjA^A DOCf^S, C*^STOlf^Lni,Z Crl^Sf 7>>v fi-o/V'^ n ^ i- «“* ^ ^f"| fo t' ^ i- It r fc-*7 *5 r A-* /Vaxj-•*• •<. *'j.^*‘f 2^<-''t .'Vi A y^)A.<ViClL r'5*' /i cTj *'^**'- / JOT* /:!/*'r"’-' /-'•/* TO ^AC*^ A**,0^ "TP V . Sti>K or- .. /A4S "3ttA4/^C» ^iSCA^ 3, ^oAlO A ^CK U{/^'^/L A cT - *^*'^ y4 tO^^‘''*» "7T' TT-Knr»w* ^ i^J fTI*-''»* * 7^^ SCOj:^ <5= A ca»i%^mt-i^r» Al ^>u //«rs*^^/■•-'*. *"•»-* "I 3'1II > 77*€ jSb'^f'TBO'...1 ..* •- ■c r - V. r-. , r. W llJ r-:- h- Hi ■t'; N'' -t - J* A* fA i f |H.' ■'•’1 h*. »•' ^}j' I V f: tr r‘? QJ 3aro *" 5^t»tr . /Jo ^ocu usm ^eA<MiC 0^3 S* Si5iT CF A)A^ •s m w rt’'M * tmm ■1 ■ft .1 A h b5 TO*Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Noorse* City Adadnlstrator FROM:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator DATES August 20» 1992 SUBJECTS Marina License Review - North Shore Drive Marina/Lakeside Marina/Gayle's Marina List of A < C D Draft Lake Use Committee Minutes# 0/12/92 Marina Compliance Susmmry Sheets Staff Memo 0/10/92 (North Shore Marina) Staff Nemo 0/11/92 (Lakeside Marina) The Lake Use Committee at their August 12th meeting voted 4-0 with Jabbour abstaining to recosmend denial of current and past licenses to North Shore Drive Marina and Lakeside Marina. Given the nature of discussions that led to this recosmendation# although not explicit in the motion# it would appear that this recommendation also applies to Gayle's Marina. Although staff had suggested issuing conditional licenses for reasons noted in the August 10th and 11th memos# the Committee agreed that if specific cede violations exist which are neither legal non­ conformities or the result of past City approvals# then such violations should result in denial of licenses. Each of the three marinas in question has one or more ouch violations (see Exhibits B)s A.North Shore Drive Marina 1. Landscape plantings do not comply with 1975 Operations Plan nor provisions of 1984 variance approval (Section 10.41# Subd. 7/Subd. 14). 2.The property has not been kept in a "neat and orderly manner free from... repair parts# machinery# equipment and debris... at all times” (Section 10.41# Subd. •^(Pl). 3.The baffle weir drainage/runoff device has been allowed to deteriorate and no longer exists. This is required as part of the 1975 Operations Plan (Section 10.41# Subd. 11). B. Lakeside Marina Landscape plantings along the east property line are ''-irati'not in compliance with the 1975 Operations Plan (Section 10.41# Subds. 7 and 14). 2. f The property has not been kept in an orderly manner at all times (storage of materials occurring in east side landscape area) (Section 10.41# Subd. 8(F)). fcf August 20, 1992 Page 2 C.Gayle's Marina 1. Perimeter plantings have been removed and/or not maintained, a violation of the 1975 Operations Plan (Section 10.41, Subd. 7 and 14). 2.Property owner continues to maintain 143 slips in violation of past City requirements allowing no more than 134 slips (Section 10.41, Subd. 8 [B], Resolutions 1060 and 1161). 3.Property owner has failed to provide a 10* wide green grass buffer strip along the shoreline, or alternatively a runoff filtration system or berm incorporated into the shoreline rip rap system, as requested by the City in 1902 (Section 10.41, Subd. 11). It was the Lake Use Ccwmiittee's recommendation that licenses be denied besed on the noted violations. If Council conceptually agrees that license denial is in order, staff would recommend that a resolution of denial be drawn up for each marina, citing the specific violations leading to denial. Mem" oomfermAties/Pmst Approvsls/OrJi nance Imedeqmecies The marinas have never complied with many sections of the B<-2 ordinance because their non-conformities pre-existed adoption of specific code sections. In past attempts to increase the degree of conformity, the City has in many cases agreed to site-specific variances related to yard requirements, landscape, parking and boat storage locations, etc. Further, it is clear that the ordinances do not address certain of the concerns coming forth in recent years, i.e. *too many boats on the property” with no code basis for limiting them or <tetermining how many is too manyi lack of regulation of land-related charter boat activities! or the land use and neighborhood impacts of boat clubs, dryland storage, and other innovations. •tnff ttiem A.Licenses. If Council conceptually agrees that the licenses for the three subject marinas should be denied, then direct staff to draft denial resolutions for adoption. B.The Lake Use Committee should be encouraged to work with staff and the marina operators to devise code revisions which will address new concerns while providing a mechanism for upgrading existing non-conformities without relying on the trigger of a variance/CUP/building permit application. Ji h If.-' 'U. I ■. I f,Un- m t-- f..‘‘ r■^ . !?• r> i'" • Itorth Shore Drlvo Marina August 10» 1092 Paga 3 of 3 9. Ganaral upkaap and usa of tha proparty shall adhara to tha followings a. Mo storage of tha aquipaant or natarials batwaan tha road and tha dry stack units. b. Licansaa shall continue efforts at debris and boats or aquipownt no longer in usa ranoval of 10. Tha licansaa is advised that Christnas tree sales are not a pamittad usa in tha B*2 iona» and would require an indnant to tha soning coda. A p.o. C xtt op tmsmo LicwM Tmt Cry*t«l 473-7357 >innni. cmomCML MWIW tlCBWl Krittint to 6tono Municipal Co«l« a«ctlon 5.42 8^0» 5.42. m‘gpRr^r-b:.“... Sf for ony poroon to P* or*^fooor«tiag) a coMorclal 2«$^SVckT«Vt”n.'.“ «^?So»? first h.vin, obt.ln.4 . lie.— thorofor froa tho City* PLBIU» 1^8 iS’SfSw c 'SS’bYATTACHMBKTS, AHD LICBNSBA^PPLICATION rt* JAHUARY 15 OF THK LICENSE YEAR* BPSIUBBS JBFOBMAyiOII 1.BUSINESS OR TRADE NAME ^^^nQJ Stroot Addross lT\o s. vl^fC Marina Phona (,»~~ PROPERTY INFORMATION Office Phone Date Property Acquired Marina Control* Property byi fee ownerahip f on - other (explain) ary ot<m FlimcE OFFICE 1311300m^“P ttt:fesr»2| List every property* occupant, other than thin Marina, occupying thia Page 1 of 5 •i \ 4 44 Mask.a . M > 4.jm«VA 4 A .*.4k A.'il.ta. 3. Addrli**) [Souiyi/££S£] J^/1 yOt^AMjJk^ j — (II4UM * A<i<iro#. tk.t »y b. .f *•<«•« «»y Otbar Proparty Ownari th •ss 4. 5. (Att«* rtiMt U n«:.«««y» BOSOTSS OBGMIIIAtlOH: ’ _t/eorpor.tioa ____ individual 0-nar.hi? ------ ^ M Aach CO®® List »•*“ r > i __________________________ ^ i M JL ^ M ra.pon.ibla for dailTuparaU^ —-—---------^-Tf aaploy... °n “ ^:%SS!if SS“Ab.*bo^9 p.r.onn.1± rr.:sr. rIMIPAI. BOSISSSS ACTIVIW (cback and larviea clip rsntsl (noorsge/ ‘ PRIIJ^— slip rsntsl (noorsge buoy rental (moorage) /dry storage (moorage) boat launchinp (day-ua. raw) / fuel sales _ bait and tacJcle sales /trailer sales ■ '■ ^ yy y / ^ ^ a ^ j _ --------------------------- isTTffr s SCHEDULE (chacJc sppropri^ts it#**bosme . s scheo _ _ towa of oparation:tlat ppopoaad hours or p Sail’‘T*raitAil sar— ^ service _ f - AM to AM to PM PM ■ - •? V a? Page 2 of 5 1, marina security is P I rovided ty: K MtCO d.fin«J BOCK 0« *«> ^UU ------------ Xin« •xt«n*ion ar«:0-50 ft. ff- ••“n.v;s*l;."i2SS.“i^jsiiss it J. SHOIIEr.lHK WIDTHS f«*t. ».»m,..:: ”.r%.r«'^!!_ «■ 10. at iuo tTi. - - - ACTUAL maximum DOCK LKNCTH frc .hor.lin.s »KSXK»CTXOH .................................. p.ci..>.nt piling with ...K>n.l d.clcing • _ • ^ 1 a i^ttclcxnQ sfc.ni:: 1 CTTPS *wr> MOAT UWA4» Each *lip» this application. MrrlM M*ui •M«* Ma«*A •U«/SMW Betts *ior«d in th. Wat.r a) At dock siiP* A : At dOCK ^14««Xt dochs. other than slips At olidoa m At lifts ji) At moorings f) pthor boats in watar Total Boats in Watar b) e) d) •* * .* • ^ • a • Page 3 of 5 *. .. . r r- |V'' I t • o.v-s«cK.a o« -S-n- -.........11 Boars ory-stacjcea ____ -r-n- *) Xnsid* Buildings b> OofcSids on RscJcs S) Outsids - othor wmmoM Total'ao«ts 0XT-St*c!£»i x«. Total Mat.rcr.ft Ac.il-.mtT tmlt. (Add 12 * 13) as. IS. Othor Boats on Pranlsa* ,) TraaalaM insidaBuildina Outsida Stora5a — . • *. • ' a* • Total - • •• 16. Wintar Storaga on Praalsas a) Transiant {2JiH«J^boats)b) Contract •«craga(cnstonar s noa c) Xnvantory (naw ft osad boat Total , Tnalda Building Qutsida ftoraga - ± /H) .amellic REQPiaEICNTS 17. Susaaar Parting *> SOC.f. ov.r 1,000 .-f.) *” ®r^l.?1irJ5*A«ila*.ility unit, (.« X _ai»- M>> ' cl Launching ranp custoaars 1*0 spacas ninliBwn par ramp L Total Spacas /C^ ca ■^7 It. Nintar Parking Minimum 2 spacas, or ratail spao lina 16a abova carg „MntrA,IMC AM,. SITE i -alat«««c. O, Ocdinan«'as raquira ••**^^^***??? proparty linasi 10 ft. SS^Scural •c2 “^’.*iJfcSsSra^Jrd o£ 10% o£ tha lot dapth, not las 10 £t. slda yard and a 1*5**~^ ®JSan 10 £t. and not mora than 75 ft.than 10 ft. ana nor ---------- , flotiars, iS^iaSStS*??S^Id^S*briSSSllad this coning licansa^ 1 ■ "V ■I ^=-:J A paae 4 of S .i . Ja. ATTACHMEMTS Th« following must accompony this application: 1. 2««? V«c^V; iipj nft^'r YrVw'inJ'S:; :i2.“*’«d\nV eb\iV.Virtpo.2d “£or th. duration of th. currant applicatl^ N /\ k 2.A DETAILSD lAHDSCAPB PIAH for ^ IhrSbbSlyr grSJraraa. and other foliage or landscaping features . 3. 4. A copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPLICATION. ^ ; I ^ A COMMEKCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION PEE neeordlnp to th. current City fee schedule.I Initial Application % $300.00 Renewal Application % $200.00 Each Boat Unit (Line 12) 0 J?*??^** Each Beat Unit (Line 13) 0 $1.00/ea rjTXHm TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION 5.LATE PEES - R«>.wala - ^(plicationa if/wVi^naJaha 11 b. aad. no lat.r than January 15 of th. now llwa. tPA.i- Tha Cltv shall not accept renewa l i*c»pgg epplica tTyns receivers ail ter January^ 1^ —g application is accompanied by a late fee ^n ? cSS^S-a pplicatlon ^"p'S^CltT ciunci! 5iir%%Vi:u^^r'M^a “n^*“c^o2^rttV/.m thereafter pass upon the application. THE MARINA MAY OPEN POR PPBLIC 2II 0”bY OPON APPROVAL OP TgE LICENSE BY THE CITY COONCIL# Pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal applicant hereby requeata the Orono City Council to reviwthia Marina License application# and agrees and authoi^sM . _ orono and the City's designated ISfety andthe marina property at any reasonable time to perform safety a code compliance inspections^ Date '-» ..••I a.7/i^B0A-aiy.^| ^.1 mm. ' * '.r • • t . I I ^ I * * ■■.■■■ ■ ■'[ ,• !•:• .%• •—. ■ j* • r.-* r • . - ■- •'^* 5 < • JS i * 4 '»'*2f>»1^4 ipi#S5« ^t3 ? f^tc/yi C‘‘^-j A V /y/? y *:• -fcr'y - - / r/«:^ / v.-:*^ S CITY OF ORONO EXHIBIT A resolution no. CONDITIONS OF ISSUANCE FOR ANNUAL COMMERCIAL DOCK LICENSE I. LICENSEE North Shore Drive Marina Address 3222 North Shore Drive Period June 11th , 19 84 to December 31, 19^ 11. BOAT DENSITY The number of in-place boat slips, lifts and buoys shall not exceed the ^ber shown on the attached p'an, EjAibit B, Resolution 938 . in no case shall the number o. authori..ed boat slips, lifts, buoys, or dry stack slips exceed the number permitted in prior year's license. Authorized Sumer Density per attached plan: Bay Maxwel1 Transient Slips Rental Slips Company Slips Sub-Total: Slips at Docks Off-Shore Buoys Maximum Boats in Water Dry stacked slip for use in lake Maximum Boats in water per prior license Other Boats (for sale/service, etc.) MAXIMUii BOAT DENSITY ON LAND AND/OR IN WATER 151 Exceeding this maximum boat density, or exceeding the number of slins lifts or buoys is a violation of this license subject t.^ aid/oi prfsLution Lr violation of Section 73.010 of the Orono Municipal Code. Authorized Number of Winter Stored Boats __82 EXHIBIT A Resolution No. Page 2 1664 III. DOCK LAYOUT (reference Exhibit B attached) IV. V. I - ^ V-. Maximum authorized length of main dc .'k 200 feet. Docks extending beyond 200 ft. and docks encroaching into required side yard setbacks are hereby specifically declared to ^ be*illegal non-conforming structures which are not permitted under this license. This application fdoVsY (does not) contain such illegal structures. a1i such violations are subject to prosecution under Sections 35.100 and 73.010 of the Orono Municipal Code. Marina (is) (W/ta'oV)' authorized for FUEL SALES subject to com.pliance with the State Fire Code. Recuired number of OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES 72 All such spaces must be maintained available on the property during all summer season hcurs of operation. SPECIAL CONDITIONS required for compliance with the ordi.nances of the City and/or the L2ICD. The issuance of this license is subject to full"compliance with these conditions. Failure to comply with these conditions is cause for license revocation and/or prosecution by the City. (SEE EXHIBIT ,B) VII.Nothing in this license shall confer upon any person for the benefit of any property any vested right to use Lake Minnetonka or the premises in a manner permitted by this resolution, but the use of Lake Minnetonka and the premises shall remain subject to such regulations and ordinances as the City and other competent regulatory authorities shall deem necessary from time to time in the public interest. Resolution No. 1664 (EXHIBIT B) The City of Orono did not grant a cor-jnercial dock license to North Shore Drive Marina in 19c0, 1981, 1982, or 1983, during which years an application for license was submitted each year, and during which years North Shore Drive was not in compliance with the City and LMCD standards. On June 11, 1984, North Shore Drive Marina settled their litigation with the City of Orono, and the City agreed to rezone subject property to B-2, Lakeshore Business District. The non- conforming docks have been removed and conforming docks are now in place. Based on these facts, this license is issued for the period June 11, 1984 through December 31, 1984. .dim I ;^st> //y>/ 50' (AT>Ap7Ut^ e?(/(//^irs /AJ \//>f^, /\frL.'p-^'Z3j 6oMicil [AJi^ ArP/QO\}{£^ Cad. 4^ jCfZ^i foCL SiriC-V/|c6 41c(iub//vJC, ^frfT^c-C- ^ \4A^\XjD\jL')Z V^/e(/\AJC€rS^n , SHORE DRIVE >WRINA: ilation: that the east side .he main dock be signed indicapped loading and /loading onlj• 9-26“90 2'^.! ^ < Jo overnight boat parking at tne o transient slips In agreement with Court Order of 9-12-86 L,.... /f^ - 9jj> ri-f- I'Mi k/f A'. Ctk' .a . *-itn n ■ k^'.a' yfA.z Z'^77 /?7S IW €)<f(. € i^f ^ t i^ic . ^ SU\P^ /‘^i'3 iU^SPtci Pte-Li !^o>'~l _7^ m ■ 0 • « n(^r "„..ir .. .75" * /^L'Jc^L L>^ 1 ■• ■ .-I/ • »J» « mo .. m> /^72- ..t'J i / f") a>• # ^0^ **vl /oo V ^r' <?*- 93 Cn^ ejct^rAi. Lot'T . Z^O rUy^rAt_ ‘r rAiii , u>’*r^/ 30 ■ri.'/»r ' y I^ejoTTii 70 ^:>^ CTA^JC StA<»»^C a J PM4J ^2" edA'Ts ''. i(>ti€(\'^^ - 4tc ft-je ^ S2.Z C^S" ,>4'ArA{- i/v.fe.-»T^ o^ 2,0 cp rd^-c :iZi^ -*(Td>/‘<"'^ri r<5/v^A/«c-'^ t-< .'""A,* ^^Ad^^^O/zjifio dotted. ^^(^(j, P-CTJlt^ {2.<iZJZt'^0r ^ tykfskifri:. C,iccri^^li 2>u^e TO V^»\TVl. *. 3>e«CU ^trt'JC.rK ^ ^ J oT y-cLicu^ku'^Z,»c-prtt /^(5 “ i^//4.T-. , . <T. Ai Mo 71.® 2- V V 71.® 2. /^a£.(3 aj 2 P(Lirv/o^s t>4S')0/fe^Ci *' ________________ ^7^ ttJ£*47At.y (^ -reA^ll^rf^.T^ ^ £O0s^^AiY^ Pt*^ I I I \% i ^MVi- /2*?^TAU 7Z SK»Ti^ "/?i?-/ ^-*-5 ^ i-rr r''iL* /fS^. /'JD CltM PfUcMX^V^ /..I S®”f^c» A^^oLve - EUMg^ /S^Vv<-<?V trfc» nn mp _m {. ^^45^ »^er^TlA-;_ *^r«? C>^ S7^4tf^ t/t^\JlT~ COa'^Pl^/^C^ ’^■CAr^’T^Ct'Oir J>o<i*i. w<JA-6r /Jc? Cltv .... ........... ... . /■IC«vu$e^ €wt-T“ /'>5T' f*/20CferS5fe't> ...............- - M /I H #* l/iW^qejAj^V iUdl lfetoft-rit »~i I < mrHitfll r jCn t 4^ 1 5/Ji S3 31 Si 2U 25 27 Si J 39 3i 33 Hi ft i-i’■ti 3^1 4- yf ff U 41 4? i'l s5 s-r >t f> !>' * 45 it. it \ii 50^L B Cir>n\M£v> /irjiAs V •JLv/-r* * > * I j (iMi.) AHiAS tiC^fS o s///fiSGS£i^y + CftAh^ I lA' K M r TT±^ • • eS yg' At^g/A^4 h !;5 ^3 !fj'<^m^ us \- L^ S S ^.ss /Q/J -*^/5 /?r*ZcM£ 7^^ 4?^ FtAMcjrlof<^ oF fk>t^ 'T>F /4/vjti. ^ 5 i^nMvuesr CLi FS. jU^(F /Uirf ,v>.eS.V f {U /£c ^ ■>■'.f r^ 'J T^'T y^CA-L^ ^ /-'lV'f S /'^ ,r1?:0 ui-ry ./^c^ l^MC-L r^/ '/ L / # 1 • » •»4* /* « f \t^, '•. / >«. . # - giy . h t f J < A ^ ■-'.^ '•. ✓•'C.C.c* — w ^’A{^ a ; ^pn~ZAJ^e ^ p^-fJTA —//G-5 / * J/^<’ ; Se'^JICP' Coy^-FAf\J ^/^,'t hr>-f ■ ^yrC<> : f:A T"l^ OC. ^ C ^ CA<^ tr* 6a^ ^ fl l<Lf^L'^'i-l *’o T^r 2-00 4^./^v»it /^J ' ^-r 7/iMe^ ^MC-tj /4/vc^ ^<cono . j *7^ Ar*JT-A(_^ ^ ^(oi^ 6^ CeiiO^c^ , /CajL 2.0 . /aj ^ ■4* /y'AfAi !Li<5cii £7-ifc^ ‘lit* /4-fcri^ aJot fi£.AFO>^(ALU'L I / J> 7^ 3 ^FAcez A’> /^-’^ £rn-^C-^,«y2At j-.'-AAj6(*-'r^ ^ ' -^:!>0^,'< ^ t^J'* LtX^r TyOCk:. /=>/'-• cU*^ \ 4 ' ^ sr, “7"?^ /\> LM»ii.^(2- ^rc ^^ j "PC<£Z t^O-r iiV TTrr Ct’TY/^ j^l? i v. /£ Ye‘A^ ^Pjz^st'^Q ‘ ^ ,? "T%Mc"»“ r^(=-# •• C" ''‘* *^ 'asA.atf /aj /Ai e.&Ar^ Per^ztry ro ^jfrt^c,^ rr Se>sy^, 77f!? //'J‘rs>^iT“ dF Tp^T . S^:M(5a Up>HsT.fc». . ______ _. . _, _____ J K/Vr? 0 M /^e6r^T--rk^ piU'r^yCe^ /Vr^ Iicf,tiz:t'^C‘ ’flA^ V?^v«ir a\<U?. .?3 *rr'"*^-. PS. £^T ur>^\y uips ) ^ - • . *•• , » 'V C u /3 -T^^Z(^^y/f2ACK s^Ac^u-»Cy^ Cfivy I^V <r 93 ^ UVAC^ MjiAi^ TT^ ieir ' ^ f /iftirJTfi'L V ZeP'itci^ ^aj poc^ TYJnt^ / A» Z>iie«5Ka ' ''' ?3 2./l.CC '• *o.-. 2jD 't>nM Z-rfiC^Z V *7 2- CTM-teC (^iMC-fc.^ hJ^N^Z A f^epJot!' TTi DectAtt^ e^nyr^U tur'z /’Jt’V'' /A/rc!> ^'P’F'^c.T^ ^ S A '! I JL, h y KIn t^n'^ /aA^ajA /^i>/c^ TH^Y /-^/^ /M/Ci *73 sT^f^Z'pet^ tWGL^ -TTfir l:>r2>y-irjCd^^ /i^C. fyrvryrfArt^ iazc ^OArx.^ UJC^Zt^^TA%AJAc*t^ Of^ <^>^AJOC /^ 77 ■ 'J ^ jV^#V>7Q /s^ OpcMm^ o^ '■r-T.j^ fi^^yi^Zj f\jA , 'f^-»^CATir f Ot^/e-rt- r^tt^ T^^4<v 30 !2a(Hj //'J T:Mb D oai V ^rst A t lAfCt> VflAPZ TVe. Z- 42>4ce5S £yU\f^2, Mb _ Op-o^^os. l>\A*f £ttF<a^ AcrOytrtn'^ '.tt^'T^ , C-rTt^FT 77^^- 'ZT l^CX> 7^» ^aFls'ide^ *r^J-ir^ ^/^^^••C. Cc>/-7r*/'4i''fc' TOi ^ / C-> fr* ift-i-’t. ^ ?- >IC ^ . iV-J £r ' ^?,;f *^^v' 7^ .zi'-ff^s F-ii' C4 •> ^ /’ i^ A ^ i. r. • >:.^ i/’' 4 ;^7).'r^/^<'^'*^«‘/* o<2- V :.r j ;. {p'z /•' - .' •? 7 1 ^4 L /?; ,t « • fAJ^fhJA ^ Of^C% CH®/i 1>nj'j^^ (^jAC Ari>i^I/U.Cl t-o A ^ . • . {# / ^ $Z i '. t ^ 2 ' . ^S C4^/AJ <1 T'S^-a-r P/aaJ ^ /J^D» ^-’AS /^y- t:;C' S'''- . /^ - \ f /. 7 /^u - / i • t * ^ ^ '- /45>ibe^») '•((-* /y4'rvf^.'0c LrJky /'Laf i^^ /*^- ^ ^XCCPT^ (p ' l//i>50 jd-^L^rjCt ••' /JC ^f^ZTAyi/Art-. TCA^jyi /z^^ut^,vt,4j^^rs S 1^4^^o^^^A^AJ r Ci-Afir^ “7^^ — ^l^rrmo^z •\'^of-^c.~» -T^'- i'P:rr~ -u '’If-t*. ^ed^ice ^u iL^/y G. ,ic*i'»i t'/Zk/^'JoG .djj/. „Si!i ^*'’f<.'t'JCn /7'-. /9*i Or^ ytiS- . / - I, 'IHl^ ,^r. "r^s.*?- Pt.'-T*'^’^.^ # - -f .;T ir^-' t?iA‘C 'TJi.-r (^/ry ,:i*7.->'^- / ./'VS- /f-’ - i-t'^ :-‘ l.jaM-nKP»^-<»«*-<'‘-’>«’-----------------....r-i..iyi«iw/li (£) T7^ A^ty i>®v S.r%Uc-z^ //iL A /yt*A€.7Vr j^oo^ r>k><w/o <3'^< 6'02^^/f ^s r/Ti£___ fj^s-TTD . /l//^Lio»f^*rz UtiLCi^C> r-55 dii^/Fl. /^eA^ #204^“, L^ir?i T7i4^ T*f^___ C:>£AUeL. f<^L^ T?*ff' -pt-cC/ " •:. /_' t -nr^jL:^ TZ^ f:^t^ ^TV*’' fAii^lhty fiJlEt. h\i -ri*C <jrw» r»^4A»5^^ ^ AJoT" Aittt* "5'fe c(t^ pyfj^j» P/' / frvr* 6<*' ’T^ <jr ‘j^y^riL PA*>ffs » ftk>7S>Z (r*^ AA>jv^ crt-^ f fLC 0 0 #w. C M ' V ^ - t- 7 /, .'«.a T» w ^ ** . C>^ fi ^ trsj^ _ TAA^ '; H.7 — L\IC!> VJIZ? ^ ^e^2u e^c /1a 'A*OUV C_ {rC- ^ ('7‘7B , ___ — /^ /^(*UtCA^T^ CA^ P<oTO t;>5CA^#«<rAJ*rfi*‘T7o», CZiA’ji'L, /oe»^< LAc^-^'^rf-^ f,l^oiS-. lc> //•?»•/ 0T*fj, I ^r >/// K #^yC4/^'T*“7^i ^ .} ^ /J€>U - ■*"’****»•—^*^ ■ -if.l'^ rf M M-«i AHm ^____ f V i LOAtYT»i_ iMjUoiAta er Vn T L.frr I'T rrrA,^ Sc^e^t^r- Aitit^^'^C •P/t^ fJ/;''^.** d‘Ot-iC4>>tt^Z . //^ |k4^MjT^Tr "X r^*^6t^S‘T' «-^(r /T' 1^0fi^ T^ (Li^C^ j /;^ S^Pe^ /S C3^t*t<c 7^ ^/^T7c4Cy 7?f«fAi ^eA^t? AP /fj^fe'SS h^^te /S'** * 4 "“y4|iri-i t-4AJTi f^/<UJ;y;^e« ^4 /-'.*/.'U//v»11 ii% /iT ^rt-4-Sr R'AFP^^i, /^L^/j6> l,^c>Oh^ PAf^n-OP: >j^ ^/., - c"^ DC.:.c •;. - i;-: . / hi^OM^ '^^’cr- T?fe /^iS’^y Opbr^-no^i l^^ll^'^i'A.tt^’T’ Vi./^^-»/7 » i^tjie. AtV^ CPTP^ ^3tr,c?«#Vy puiATT^C, ^-ei/tt (/j^s p ‘/AjAAi^*f /NiTAtu^i /AJ /fBO ^u7^ d*jA: 5Af3£r/c^y/ieiT?,-/yc.c , /4r 7>^'^T;/w-r / ,CiP'CAf^ l\J/{S //CTA/4fcw CA>rc^^(^ Vehf^lS ^ ^l-pf fAt^^Ci* ^w^jnjau. T?i ^e d’A-z/n/A/Art^ T'44 t - :Z{p a^ ,'4A: /occ^ j‘g-irTt.fe'1':;. - 1 h I / .............../ f' ^ .0' ./'7j , _ _______ _____ _______________ ___________ ____ Jaj » *r? O aj ^ ^ T?^C cLzT -*> v' r-' •* •• 5- ^*5c!i>Ai _.% IS ^ w S- \^ • • /7 “5VH9^^ D ,.itvu:?i/47T»'Ci f^/r74- L^i^ZT A :Z'-f^ir »r^/0y** U>T‘ S^^'P>7'r>^ l/JU'/e:: LJ A6ix^r- i^S' Av^ <.^Git(^it^ ^«J^iA-T7 OM A 10,^1 Sm-4^? IIj ^ P«rrfeA»'r?oM l>w^/6i/Je /^!:» c^/jC.r>i4«.orU:C;* /4 t" *7?^ >^4^ of« T?hf /j^cro^ Bt€Tw8ABL*/ ^/J AT* £^ST7f4G l:^2Af#44rOt*.purr4.«sTJ /A*<s«iCi^or2^r?7^C* elfre t>tr^‘^c ^(/vCF/id i f »- p/?>*^#^/:-.<;<> no >pTT ^<?a-'I^. ■“ 'lo4? A^ IAJ •'/■'* k-*. >W. ^ ‘^—1. SU ?ptra - S TV {f* /i^ i/A- 8^ T>ev exc(>fC,; ■^>t * *- - • Otrw*w6v-<—no i^fi^ /-4tioo'’J , A fpfiAi tJ h • • Jkr^ «• ««av o-'?r'”?ir*-^ AirA yU st>2.^W 27 rAB.i/3 3.2-^2 .^^*A.-r.->- •9 1 2-4,. f 1 S—,T Uo •V • f A ^ 1 * ■ *«»• 2.C2./OC/ • (A "•/./7 t-'p-ioj?-;.20 A ^ ^/ I ^ / !,✓ 1 ✓ ^(7. VO A,c S.UOL^.i»,7/0,5:7 At t/^jff'jy^^ jt/ l^jLivAi . ^ Z fS A £ ;T?^ fi^i^rty, T^ Th"^ \l^:Z '*'«■ 0 /-y^'^Cs'^Z^r /f>w7;:»c.o 7"'?•*’•'* 0'^^ c^Aif ^Ar: A cf a^.s^ i/-a'i~' ^.2 Ae-i»' /7*?"-'f “ 6oy/j7?/ ;^7t:, '4 ir-^ ^ ^ .’ T'/J A:^ /c' O ui:/rj<^, A £r-A'^7 |2.'A'c : •:< 7/.V.. :, - V. 5-^ . ^3 C ^ Z.^ ‘'•J A/lV-A :DuT:*'^t= -r'M'tr ^''7A * '2^tJE:^n f ^ 2—^ Tp^ T2>rA<_ P(UP£:A tf ^ COMPAQ TH(^ TO Ai/j/'r'H r'S*o.2'*AiA-;. IZ^'BO y&O = dS,S>oo 3-f oe £>.6.c.^ «>r!L S'^/K oP nr^ CXfVr'’^C o-^ Zf/^ gP-T)^ C><377<2^ ^^PeiLT^ f .At lrApiZ:Z>ii:'z. /^C* C7P»v7--A cy^cul^ 7c^<!^ i/p 5Z5VOO )J^ G^j^or ^om'i>-“?r^ 0<^ ^pT*/o cf- ^jrf^p^ry. /",:^c^A Of- P;<i'-'.'t^^C. £i-n >-A/»M 4 ~ CSPL^ 4 ' I'*' |£-S-' 2V1.4:<?‘-'L /f \i^’j> A ''*' •* :.J. ^^t• i I t"* ' ' ' IV' * I* J V \!*• .T > r '•1--c / I • 4 r» N •- ( -/ro7 i-K. • j’i''OlC‘k^)^ tj,CiAh^ Z*-^ A , !/jcu uii <^fe7^A'^JL_7 cof'^^ r^^'r'^ i/'-c r l; y '7r^ t€ P^T » «* •}/'iTO (r^t^ A^4 /V42./;V Cr 'TJ) Li^iT Ui>NT^^ £ry^A^^: /i X^^TT^rt/ni/J^ i:r.^ //o7^ ^o»-r-H;.-J n M ✓ . .. ^ 3 I'-iCO T>^ ,<i--f:/^r~ ^ • X » » ^ . • / • 4 «.-• /■ » C. •'—* ■ •■■ 3 » 3v'.e-n:A<r-T A^4>/£c Or tvi V ‘''••.M" ^ A ^ ess T /A j 4, ^t .£~0/^ Of iLky^^^f^c ^€ Or^^TPii *TC> goAfr . S‘'fr>r2A4-^- (ASl^C> A fAr^-TD^ O.^ 3^ ^r. Pc^ , /^/c^^6rtr' >‘^;r /.^.*^V'Le •/‘•r3T':v:a^> r.’***' S#Ao6^vfj(W X^'\^ ^/4^C— *!:::c SroQjte^ , f / < • ' ^ r»' ■“ / :•'-'/•• A." f h,\:r:< !.'»-.■*.> Ji. e.i>-A^ ’V5;r‘e :r\ — .,-/ !’• /o'c :-^r ^ :y >cz6 •--> -'•-> • /Ul"* A '*'' CH'y ~ ^ Uv'^'v # i?-V'7'^ 25,'■-■^ ■ S,sa? -^^,200-*-3, /ro -• z^joco - g,v^ /V5,5^o-“ /Olt-SO nAii*Tt ~r ir fflrti I *■ ........ ' -2,0 ' i^%yZLm " I ^^2^ ^4^t>-> ^, X- s •*•' /? v.*/^ • S2.^ Hoy'zr^ “ 5<»«o 2-’ >/s 26x^8 =: ^ns -r^TArV ^ •TOO /J071& ' J)/rV J r^ 4 . A^7~. t\r ' ^ <i ■-'/ i. L '/jc., ifi?>’JT ;4’‘" >_______________ '^3.. -rr^ ^ Cs^o 3:^. 3, ^o/AJ-rT.-a. pAi ’iki/J-C ^ "j y, (» “ ^TT r' ^ (£e^A/L- =c-.-Y .... s L ID . 20 >^'70 - /V ^Po-Pr Ui£AJ7^^___ 2 j6 > loo' To' ^\ZO' 3o^ ^ f2^' /4<*d^52 iAon^ ^7 /rO- /2rC?^•N r-8c^ I ro -/ oSO >'5r/i'D= H2^'^ -rzzoj /^2_ '’ ' ' Ui’iJn-a. ' -ST.-L-r-iij r) ST^CArC>0: OJO-^ifel. / ^,12^ AC^ - 92ySOO ^r. Ia^ t/A^, rf' Jcy 2-"> 2> t* • ^ */S-- Srr^T fO X 2-‘7T ./O >^37 3^2-)S r «yt,3S r X'7 3^ r /r>, yoo ZO ,71 o ^ZiSOG-Topi'o r 7/,7?r 2,<?.7^^ V3 -s /lo r /,' ;n'*\t • ^ ^ * ' I 7 1,79 a « //, i/ia i 5 >0 d-* f^(L. tO/'jT'tv^ ’ » '• *2-*-' 3* • / ^/ • • *♦ >< ^-O'.f-VV- t^?ur> .-S'V'crO s-^. AO, 3BO-iTiCro - S^<i2.0 V,, CH920 X,<r - z-),%r 78 ////WTiC- ^•7C4e^ --^ ----------.^■»alL A /Ssu^ ----------------------------------------------- ___ C Af *^'P^^Hr€d> /cB^'^'f ^(^Uc<24^ i/r/^<-"^’r Or r?:^ ^•'u*iA'/ / (i<- uri.^ T?'*-^ ' i- ^ ^^^•'A.-..:r'V /l'--!=: ^ r • , t M f $ »•• ' t-ii » ' ‘-'^ :/ •/*, •^ ^ k A • . .— - ' .. '• #* t ..^ »« ' • •• • (2 ^0'/>^/-<i:.L--noo_,~j!£/tlL£iL 2!wo.44-ii. Ber.vti-t^ ^S^Xi £-^9'-_:-r;-cii,c /£ /<^aj e /£-;o^ ^ •' !.\/l • '_ _______________ * r’^ /svy/<y# . .. . rp T?^^‘ — ^Pi^ZTliZ rn- >j4?ejZlZ P*A*^j/r 1, ;/: ^/iA.'oTE'?. t:^'1 /vteT^ fBrrt' i ..l. (<r,vv 'P i^/v e / /-' •:- //.—--'»y^ .-• . ^ / t -- . .-<• — • - ••-p/So^^' fOt'^ fGMk<k^)0,(a( S-mJi^ ■ 2> A /}<.Lciuz. / J.4-. ~r ::’'.t'^csL ^-/4 f'TUOfJ*^ j P-.V2- fj: > 3/S:.. /V)Ay 4?*A .c *';,M </i.,N':.'.L-* C3 Kr 7 WtsT /Mo^/C<^c^~C°h‘ /s 'tr> 7*rkCki. '7’X^ l/OOU ^ “T'Pr^ & fir. / /UVfiY ^ ^ /i'ji:- /ArTTZ^^T^kno^ /X "^r'■'•' <,? ''''id ^.t(''^. **^ ^ ‘^* - ^ “: ^-■ ,C^ ^ ^ O A< ‘“ . sr^ :':^’*<^^,c,T y-YO-k’Z ^ » — a-^-):,aj t// - ::*^;^rv; fAi hi C < £*—?2^ C-.7"'<->r-'A* S. ^ 2 U0T3 /^2-e ' ' H^- I'^/jA^fJ.^ J-iA;^ _3 t^Aj ^d^ZT LoT^ 7^ l>v')-0.^-*^ Zt~'^'>'^T^»^Z <ja> A^'i^tO- •• £: ::''!I- ^ <^.<nCX( ^-r^- ,< v*^ f--*i<!-- • n i *^• }'AkZ.J fj A <^c:5>> A ‘X>?'.4; *u; ^ " S' f‘ '• ‘' r-A. J (*^ A A»(f5 , /a; •— • t—tv— ^ / nr?-* /c'^c.. ^ A fit. DC, C’Tt^Mr , ^'TX&'fS i*-f<Z t^uCi’~lT r* 2>-';<l//•<!, fl-'''f'A^.. f • L-'’* *'"'i* J '^r** J' ^ r* i. ♦ lo, I jvT f y eL C-^ ^ /7.n <C c '^i!f l^rOc//,<S^ //jD jyiC^^fKf^ 7<D *77^ x;77f r//j^^^ er/^TPxy.^ OF^ . cofn e^/AJ^-r/OA^ ^suc^Tj //J /^ s/rho&rv^t^ Lm Oj <? T CiM / VAtt- 6r- “Ti C*^.-~ ;5aj C^'^Z. I * ./o f- - {':*-'' ,'• A t. Zry iM c »V ‘r’-^ (L/^^ f z: r' ’-.'’^7 -:m ,\% J \. <Z>\Z Clf zs /r-^::- A*r 2250 /MSt::^ .^-r ^ 2. "2X2^ C^LFfL^ 'ii^ ~~ . ^LT'wu^rr/Of>i_ >/V^^ <^/^ O^T* Qt/ST ■ fvj Tfc L. 1^-*, e -TO d)>v7 5 “ /Ci c/o__ fvvAij/'-"'- rrio^f:*i>.r-f Tf^6ue)^v.J ^0}^1L*A Nor' M to ^ l:^— ^' 2... ’iL:rrrA.!=rT^ . (S rong.-rHv»' (Ai«^ p7r^ }Z /JO- ^ 6hu, L '^//^c-c‘X/o^) . •% ’ ^ ‘ * •- * •- Xr*^ *•"/Cr^c-O^^j / J- ^ "/j^^ lAJ^ C.U/JK “? 'TD J ouns*/VJ >t?li, “res )^vVC rr r#^EQPfrc.v^ A<-^ , iftiUiiiiSi O .. O"CITY of ORONO Municipal Offices PMO(BceBax66 CrrMl Bm%\ Minn«o«a 55325-0066 May 28, 1992 North Shore Drive Marina 3222 North Shore Drive Tjayzata, Minnesota 55391 ATTENTION: Mark and Debra Breneman Re: Licensing Update Dear Mr. and Mrs. Breneman:- - - - - Thank you for Aor^ SIL"ov":a^ed “e:rip” Check in the amount of S604.00. _ _ _ _V The City in its P-t .licensing jgr^ed t al^ \n \^^e%a\:rr-exersfv^e^rf' slicked hosts. The dry stack agreement e*ecuted by the City of Orono and ”orth ^Shore Drive Marina, Inc on July 29,^1^^ agreement that no settlement of litigation between us, more than 20 boats would be dry stackeamote - - The 86 boat slips referred to and ^«oth^^ boats" permitted you 106 boats ^^^®^^^®have been permitted for a totalon land for servicing, sale, etc. nave oe- y density of 151 boats. your current license application, and assume your cur«^ intended use, shows a total boat^dens^^^^^^^Intended use, shows a t°tal boat density o iiv opposed to are apparent. a?ackef?ol iake use, contrary to the86. You propose 72 boats ary Court settlement. TELEPHONE - 47>7357 • F.\X • 473-0510 nil laiffiflWl North Shore Drive Marina May 28, 1992 Page 2 consequently, you are edvised « jeduce^^e^|°^j^^^ number, ® on the P=^°P®^’=? "inin? a°licMse, submit a revised application first step to obtaining has no intent at tnxs u ^4nn^lv i" V/sV/rou“f ol?’«’=°wlnt"eV s^or^d" ic^ts tn tSe water during t^e^ surfer. You are license ;;c?rihln°l!^^er there^is 3 “ be for no more than 8^ wintej. difference. P«iirr inspection ««cra\?llu:-a! fo^^°rn\"%1tce^n°e*r but which 1 am aware you are making to resolve* 1. Lack of required screening along west sxde of building. 2. OUixaiiiy - site plan). 3. site plan;. , substantial aPP»=^®^"^'^ covertts ^repla«rwith'“d\corative g«ve l” betwtL &:y“ stacks and County Road 51. 4. the site which vou acknowledged and which =ir^ot\d1::^°e fn%re“p'rccess of cleaning up. 5. you norea vwu — - I also mentioned to you a number of future items discussion, including:------------- Establishing a grass buffer area along the shoreline. Future hardcover reductions should be anticipated. North Shore Drive Karina May 28# 1992 Page 3 a 0 t-h#. Citv for runoff controlFuture requests by facAities should be antxcxpa.ed. d. W-^ a------------------- - ^ • adition, you advised me that Veconstw riVulT re£« *5^;i ‘’%rTurii= works coordinator John Gerhardson X'eg’axding this itiattar’# Review of your signage allowances is in order. regarding this maruei. ^ you also mentioned you lig'ramp.* "zoning avoided. your application indicates "‘^^“|J”®chri'stmas*tree sfles^is not anYOU. epp._,„j..„_ IS „e crscussed, Chrrs.m conditions it^-in^iractivit^^^ ^thir may -/.sf^L^^^re^’e^saL"-'y^ur ^^roperty orooer way to pursue approval of ^^5 However, I must rei^-eraue M-Hs’iiii*-■■ —' - ■■ ■■“ irylu are aware, the City hfarina^^And^^f i^revteiing fhe'*'v\r=iSSs Tnjtr-lnaSe It xnay be uha^. th i i Tnake x^coinxnendatxons about committee investigating these setters, especially i" changes of clubs", dry stacking and "charter boat to on demand launching# boat ciuoa operationsoperations. soecial event 1 would further note that^^ SF/Sh%"rasTss:e%-rtl/t\n\-t^^ -’® resolved. North Shore Drive Karina May 28r 1992 Page 4 Slist!" plannings Zoning Administrator MPG/ch l^rLtcense A^rUca^-ion Submitted 3) Application Blank OC- Jeanne A. Hebusnh, anildin, * Zoning Adm. * Ron Moorse, City Adiarnrs .ra.or City Council m'^^rictLake Minnetonka Conservation District bSJb»'»' I I nie iii~1nntf iTiiiinnTn ttifciiTi u A NORTH SHORE DRIVE MARINA SUMMARY OF LICENSE APPLIC. FEES 1991/1992 1990 1991 Paid; Paid: $200 00 base fee $200.00 base fee 186.00 slip fees 168.00 dry-stack $554.00 pai^i Correct 1991 86 slips X $2 20 dry-stacxs x 9J- $200.00 base fee 172.00 slip ^ees 20.00 dry-stack fees $392.00 correct fee 1991 Overpaymen w •$162.00 1992 Paid;$200.00 base fee 186.00 slip fees 168.00 dry-stack fe-s 50.00 late fee $604.00 paid , $200.00 base fee correct 1992 fee; ^ ^73.00 slip fees 36 slips p ^ ST „ 20.00 dry-stack fees 20 dry-stacks x 9 50.00 late fee $442.00 correct fee 1992 overpayment;$162.00 refund DUE: $324.00 •v — .* i. • ( III'>■ ffciiia r' I / i'' / i' A - t £x^' /i \\ CITY of ORONO Municipal OfSccs Poit Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minoooia 55323-0066 July 17, 1992 Rachel Thibault Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 900 East Wayzata Blvd Suite 160 Wayzata, MN 55391 Re: North Shore Drive Marina Dry Stack Dear Ms. Thibault: Attached please find a copy o£ the Agreement" between the City o 1978 Orono license issued to Inc. Also attached is a =°PV ^ slips ”1^1;e=5r:Upt’'thri^"^placfw“^Mn^ t^^^d^y ftacb units. The City has in effect P1^^^^“^^5'°ye;rs! that agreement to remain contained 48 total storageAlthough the dry stack units initially cont^^^ spaces, it is my understanding at some later « -rc^l ^°Hc^%^"Tha^fbfn°l4f££a no docu.aentation^ that ?“nTal^ s-rips^rr.el'’ f°/r ‘b^oaVs ll/t^rre^lan^/rtlred for use in the water.’▼ V SSr^^S^rS— - “-..s slips. Therefore, the remaining 52 dry stack spaces ineretwi. f -ale or held on consignment, boats unuec used for boats for sale Kriat-Q heina stored on a long term basirfoV:tVe?»Lonl\"^no't intended to be brought back and forth to the lake. 473.7357,pAX-4rw»io r*r*V •• -*77" Rachel Thibault July 1/, 1992 page T: c i* 2 S/on“»ISserto1.\^^o^rn7-re then 20 ^ry stechea bo to be Itl ?e"n1aTl2"or^^"?b “f tTerrX% fee\s"tLl^ll ?2 traceslicenses those sli^-s. 1 hope this is helpful. If I can provide you more information, please feel free to rontact me at 473-7357. Sincerelyr Michael-P. Gaffron , , , ^ Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator MPG/jb 1 i } .1 *n Ui L 1 . \ I*,' r - •>»• A tr» I wj-•- it • # M ,VMi» -* v f i To:Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator w .'*. isiCBi’ii From: Date: AUG 2 4 1992 Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Ai^gust 20, 1992 Subject: Preliminary Flexibility Request - City of Wayzata List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Letter of Transmittal from Wayzata*s Planner Exhibit B - Flexibility Request Exhibit C - Shoreland Ordinance Discussion Attached is the Shoreland Ordinance adopted by Wayzata in July 1992. Their preliminary flexibility request (not yet reviewed by DNR) includes: 1.Flexibility in lot width requirements? some of Wayzata's are slightly smaller than DNR's requirement, but lot area requirements generally comply with DNR standards. 2.Residential density (PUD Section). This flexibility request suggests that, based on the densities that would ha allowed if all the shoreland was developed by PUD, there is an overall surplus of development capacity due to fringe low density residential areas offsetting the higher density areas. They suggest a process to allow for tranferring any surplus development capacity which would allow coitinued development and redevelopment in the high density areas. 3.Impervious surface coverage. In both Spring Park's and Wayzata's proposals. Northwest Associated Consultants have used air photos to define hardcover by calculating footprint of structures, accessory structures and driveways, but not accounting for sidewalks, landscaped areas, etc. which is very liberal compared to our definition of hardcover. Since DNR does not want to define what is or isn't hardcover, we have no real basis to questions Wayzata's proposal. We could presume that downtown areas of Wayzata will continue to be developed on a high intensity basis. One facet of their proposal would be to use residential development capacity surpluses to allow excess densities in the commercial areas, subject to a CUP. Greater hardcover coverage (up to 100% when in conjunction with a "Shoreland Impact Plan" that provides physical protection and preserves water quality) would be allowed. 4 Preliminary Flexibility Request August 20, 1992 Page 2 - City of Wayzata 4.Wayzata is proposing a building height maximum of 35', and building heights in excess of 35' under a Shoreland Impact Plan/CUP requiring adherence to criteria for screening and building appearance. Wayzata has developed a Shoreland Management Plan that goes hand in hand with its 1988 Stormwater Management Plan, Their clear intent is to continue the intense commercial activity by limiting outlying residential densities. Staff Recr.—eni.lL ion No action is necessary by the Council at this time. Council is encouraged to review Wayzata's proposal and consider whether any specific response will be appropriate when Wayzata's formal flexibility request is received via the DNR. Isv i'..' *» iii ■■ ■ If ifl i fl ■ ^lll 1*1 S liillT ~ Vn-k.ia-niliOII^Ri Hill ll liS BiA* ViL.L.a.^' * ^ A C Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. URBAN PLANNING •DESIGN ‘MARKET RESEARCH 31 July 1992 Honorable Barbara Peterson Mayor, City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Dear Mayor Peterson: On behalf of the City of Wayzata, our office is forwarding to you Section 91, the Shoreland District of the Wayzata Zc.iing Ordinance, adopted by the City Council on 21 July 1992. We have also enclosed a request for flexibility from the State of Minnesota's Shoreland Management Standards. Drafts of the Shoreland District have been reviewed and comments have been received from the Department of Natural Resources but final approval has not been given. The City has based the Shoreland District regulations and its recpaest for flexibility on a Shoreland Management Plan, which provided a physical inventory of all lots within the Shoreland District and an analysis of background information on lot size and width, lot coverage, and density. The plan has been adopted as an amendment to the 1900 Wayzata Comprehensive Plan, and functions with the Shoreland District in providing the regulation for shoreland areas. Copies of the Plan are available upon request. In that flexibility is being requested, we solicit your input on the Ordinance. Please direct any questions to me, or Planning Coordinator Tom Young at the City of Wayzata (473-4178). Comments can also be directed to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division of Waters, Shoreland Management Program, 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106 to the attention of Ed Pick, Shoreland Hydrologist (772-7910). Sincerely, NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. Scott D. Richards Senior Planner pc: Tom Young Enclosures 5775 Wayzata Blvd. • Suite 555 - St. Louis Park. MN 55416 *(612) 595-9636*Fax. 595-9837 -ni IM¥fli> il») I 11 1 Mil I ifiT iTiT ■ I J WAYZATA SHORELAND FLEXIBILITY REQUEST INTRODUCTION The City of Wayzata has developed adjacent to two major bodies of water. Lake Minnetonka and Gleason Lake. These natural amenities add significant aesthetic, recreational and economic value to the community. Shoreland in Wayzata and Lake Minnetonka has historically developed with a productive commercial and residential base in its downtown area and very low density single family development in the remaining area. Gleason La^e shoreland has developed with a variety of single and multiple faimily uses. The potential for additional new residential development exists on Gleason Lake, while Lake Minnetonka has potential sites for commercial and residential development/redevelopment. Therefore, flexibility in shoreland standards which protect the shoreland areas and quality of the water, while allowing controlled development and redevelopment is of highest importance to Wayzata. Based on the historical development of the City, the direct application of the shoreland standards would result in nonconforming status for uses primarily in the commercial areas, but also in residential areas throughout the 3noreland area. The potential for a large area of the City to become nonconforming complicates landowners' rights, inhibits development, and affects the City's tax base. In this regard, the City of Wayzata, as part of its implementation of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources' State-Wide Standards for "Management of Shoreland Areas" is requesting flexibility from portions of the shoreland standards in order to carry out the intent of the shoreland standards while recognizing and accommodating the urban development ch<. racter of the City and its continued development/redevelopment. The issues and analysis are based on background technical data that has been physically inventoried and included within a Shoreland Management Plan for the Wayzata Shoreland District. The Shoreland Plan has been adopted as an amendment to the 1980 Wayzata Comprehensive Plan. The plan is the basis for and functions with the Shoreland Ordinance in providing the necessary regulation for the shoreland areas. The plan specifies areas in the shoreland which require flexibility and how Wayzata will address each flexibility request item. The background technical information on density, lot coverage and lot width have been compared to the DNR shoreland management standards where applicable, and the City Zoning Ordinance to determine the level of development capacity of the City. { The City of Wayzata is requesting flexibility from the shoreland standards in the following areas; 1. 2. 3. 4. Lot Width Residential Density Impervious Surface Coverage Building Height An analysis of each flexibility request is as follows; 1. LOT WIDTH Due to the historical development of certain areas of Wayzata, residential properties with duplex, triplex, or quad in primarily the R-3, R-4A, R-4, and R-5 Districts nave developed with lot widths that are substantially * than allowed by DNR shoreland standards. So as not to create ..cixuerous non-conformities, the City has proposed lot widths wider than what is allowed in the base zoning district requirements of the City but less than the DNR shoreland standards. The lot sizes proposed in the Ordinance are consistent with the DNR standards in that the City and DNR standards are not substantially different. A comparison of the existing City base zoning district, the proposed, and the DNR standards for lot width in the R-4 District is as follows; TABLE 1 LOT WIDTH STANDARDS Riparian (R-4 District) City Base Zoning District City Proposed Shoreland DNR Single Duplex Triplex Quad 60 100 iOO 100 75 100 125 150 75 135 195 255 Non- Riparian (R-4 District) City Base Zoning District City Proposed Shoreland DNR single Duplex Triplex Quad 60 100 100 100 75 100 125 150 75 135 190 245 In that all lots within the Shoreland District are served by municipal sewer, the residential density for the City is substantially less than what would be allowed under the DNR 1 I I n> II ■'! 'am ■H I !■ hiila iiw i i i ip< i i ii -r 1 . L_-V u I requirements, and the lot size requirements are not to vary from the DNR standards, flexibility is being requested. 2. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY In order to determine overall compliance with the DNR density standards, a density calculation was performed. The purpose of the residential development density calculation is to determine the maximtim allowed by the DNR model and compare this to the existing development conditions in Wayzata. Tables 2 and 3 illustrate this exercise: TABLE 2 LAKE MINNETONKA SHORELANt) DISTRICT EXISTING AND ALLOWABLE UNITS Allowed Surplus/ Section Net Area Units Units Deficit Section 1 32Tier I 703,000 15 47 4- Tier II-V 3,357,000 93 (42)336 +243 Section 2 Tier I 148,000 4 10 +6 Tier II-V 75,000 3 8 +5 Section 12 Tier I 1,157,000 15 77 +62 Tier II-V 2,086,000 21 209 188 Section 5 3Tier I 70,000 2 5 •¥ Tier II-V 1,038,000 52 (16)104 •f 52 Section 6 Tier I 580,000 17 39 -*•22 Tier II-V 1,431,000 140 (82)143 +3 Section 0 Tier I 1,295,000 16 86 +70 Tier II-V 899,000 2 90 4*88 TOTALS 195Tier I 3,961,000 69 264 4- Tier II-V 8,886,000 311 (140)890 4-579 12,847,000 380 (140)1,154 774 1 i TABLE 3 GLEASON LAKE SHOREIAND AREA EXISTING AND ALLOWABLE UNITS Section Net Area Existing Units Allowed Units Surplus/ Deficit Section 5 Tier I Tier II-V 1,029,332 3,135,999 96 (86) 116 (95) 51 209 - 45 + 93 4,165,331 212 (181)260 -t- 48 (00) Represents number of multiple family units of the total units indicated. As can be seen from Tables 2 and 3, a significant surplus exists (792) in the number of residential units allowed in the Shoreland District, based upon the DNR density standards. LaJce Minneton)ca has a surplus of 774 units and Gleason Lake 48 units. This surplus exists due to the majority of the residential Shoreland District being designated as very low density residential in the Comprehensive Plan and as R-IA on the zoning map, which requires a minimum 80,000 square foot lot size. The surplus would thus supposedly accommodate numerous and significant future residential development within the City's Shoreland District. It is very doubtful, however, whether the City would desire, or could even facilitate, 792 additional residential units, given the limited lands available for development/redevelopment. A process to allow for the transfer of surplus development capacity and to provide for the flexibility has been developed utilizing a shoreland impact plan/conditional use permit (CUP) process. A shoreland impact plan requires a CUP, as regulated by the Zoning Ordinance and a submittal of a plan that provides a detailed summary of the changes to be made and how the efforts of the development are to be minimized. The process is outlined in Section 801.91.19 of the Shoreland District, as attached separately. Transfer of the development capacity from one area to another may allow for development and redevelopment in areas indicated in the City's Comprehensive Plan and West Lake Street Plan for residential developments. In addition, mid to high density residential developments approved through the PUD process may require flexibility to allow for transfer of surplus units to these areas as is necessary. Mid to high density projects that exceed Shoreland Ordinance requirements are proposed to he allowed with a Shoreland Impact Plan but would not exceed the maximum allowed density of the base zoning distrit of the subject property. Approval of flexibility would reflect the intent cf the Comprehensive Plan to provide for very low density development in most areas in the shoreland areas, but would make allowances for higher densities in areas identified in the plan. 3. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE The purpose of the lot coverage inventory in the Shoreland Management Plan was to determine, by zoning district, the areas of the City which contain lot coverage below and above the maximum allowed by the DNR shorelana standards. The City wc.s broken down into separate shorelanc areas; Lake Minnetonka and Gleason Lake. These differentiations were made because of the different classification of the water bodies and because of the differing intensity of development. Each separate area was further divided into separate zoning districts for the lot calculations to determine lot coverage and open space. City records were used to identify each parcel and its lot size. Using aerial photographs and section maps with superimposed buildings, lot coverage was calculated by measuring the footprint area of all structures, accessory structures and driveways. Subtracting this calculation from total lot size provides the remaining open space. The eunount of surplus/deficit let coverage is determined by computing the maximum allowable impervious surface coverage by DNR standards. Actual lot coverage was subtracted from the allowable coverage to determine each lots surplus or deficit lot coverage. Table 4 indicates the cunount and percentage of impervious surface coverage for each zoning district. TABLE 4 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE IN SQUARE FEET AND PERCENT LAKE MINNETONKA Zonina Lot Area Impervious Surface Percent Covered R-IA 23,504,684 520,500 2 R-1 686,511 73,900 10 R-2 941,226 56,400 6 R-3 231,799 26,800 12 R-5 471,872 61,000 13 C-1 419,450 233,604 56 C-2 855,747 772,578 90 C-3 168,747 163,562 97 C-4 399,420 294,413 74 C-4A 78,408 34,848 44 C-4B 27,007 27,007 100 INST 364,924 112,500 31 28,149,795 2,376,662 8 ■i i * TABLE 5 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE IN SQUARE FEET AND PERCENT GLEASON LAKE Zoning Lot Area Impeirvious Surface Percent Covered R-1 R-3 R-4 R-5 C-3 INST 1,607,959 257,628 952,937 099,872 297,068 1,305,199 79,300 29,000 16,400 246,800 223,764 360,000 5 11 2 27 75 28 TOTAL 5,320,663 33,470,458 955,264 3,331,926 18 10 Comparing the shoreland areas as a whole to the DNR model with regard to impervious surface coverage, the City is well within the surface coverage allowed and has a reserve of 5,051,803 square feet. The low densities and large open space figures are a result of current zoning controls which are for the most part more restrictive than the DNR model shoreland regulations and act to preserve the shoreland areas of Wayzata. The significant disparity between lot coverage in residential and commercial areas provides the City an opportunity to utilize residential surplus for further develcpment/redevelopment. Development which proposes to exceed the lot coveraga/open space requirements of the Shoreland Overlay District shall be subject to a conditional use permit and Shoreland Impact Plan, which will emphasize storm water management and quality of runoff. The DNR requirement for impervious surface coverage (25 percent) will be too restrictive to allow for development and redevelopment within some areas of the Shoreland Overlay District. Average lot coverage for commercial uses indicates that on average, most lots in the commercial zones are developed at or close to 100 percent with impervious surface coverage. For development to be successful in Wayzata, especially in the downtown, allowance for flexibility to allow development/ redevelopment as well as provisions for on­ site parking is fundamental in this highly developed area. New developments are proposed to be allowed to exceed 25 percent, up to 75 percent if structures and practices are in place to treat storm water runoff from directly entering the lake. Coverage to 100 percent will be allowed with the submittal and approval of a Shoreland Impact Plan/conditional use permit. All proposals that exceed the Shoreland Ordinance requirements will be requirea to meet the objectives of the City's Storm Water Management Plan and provide the added physical protection for preserving water quality. _ _ _i 4. BUILDING HEIGHT The current Zoning Ordinance allows building height for development in its zoning districts of between 30 to 40 feet. The City is requesting flexibility in building height to allow for a maximum of 35 feet. Building heights of over 35 feet would be allowed through approval of a shoreland impact plan/conditional use permit and would be required to meet criteria for screening and building appearance. The City requests flexibility so that all zoning districts may retain the existing building height and so that development/ redevelopment can take place in an equitable fashion. CITY EFFORTS TO MANAGE SHORELAND DEVELOPMENTS In light of the City's request for flexibility, the City has adopted the following which promote the quality of the water bodies and enhance the aesthetics from the lake surface. 1. The City has adopted the Shoreland Management Plan as an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan which estcdalishes goals and policies to improve the quality of the water and enhance aesthetics. 2. The City has developed a Storm Water Management Plan in 1980 to provide the framework for upgrades to the existing systems. The storm water plan has identified systems to better accommodate runoff and also to improve the quality of storm water runoff. The City is currently in the process of implementing many aspects of the storm water plan. 3. The City has developed a policy in the Shoreland Management Plan to implement the development capacity transfer. Approvals of flexibility which exceed Shoreland Ordinance requirements shall be monitored by the City of Wayzata. An accounting shall be made to determine the number of dwelling units or cunount of lot coverage for each project and the amount of surplus to be transferred to each project. The reductions to the surplus of 744 residential units on Lake Minnetonka, and 40 units on Gleason Lake, or reductions in the excess lot coverage of 5,701,036 square feet on Lake Minnetonka and 150,767 square feet on Gleason Lake shall be documented so that the City will have a current accounting of the developed density and lot coverage and not exceed the maximum development capacity as has been established in the Inventory of the Plan. k-- . . ------ •’* '^<* ■ • ••* * • i\- ■ ' « . '.» - % • V.- •;• ..• .. ..7. . % ■••.«•* ^ •,. L'SECTION 91 ir •*» i - S SHORELAND DISTRICT X- w • % . i.t . • i -' ' • . ^' ' • ir ifr*^ T >'x.* fc'. *..■ - <.' .• V* .*. AND :‘*Sa • ' «4 SECTION 801.02.2 i SHORELAND RELATED DEFINmONS k- £•■ -•------. •• • « ♦»» • - r • •• • . . .' V. ~-v...•• . *’ r. . •-,’••^.. * * f*#. ■ '<: ■i L ;.. .. • •.• ’ ' -X »• •xrx.J ~»*..* * •* r.-WAYZATA, MINNESOTA rr ••'• *iv::v. •■■ wr* *S — ?»•,JULY 1992 ____ aik. ,-«fc..—_______.... -...ai.. SECTION 91 30 June 1992 S SHORELAND OVERLAY DISTRICT SECTION 801.91: 801. 801. 801. 801. 801. 801. 801. 801. 801. 001. 801. 801. 801. 801. 801. 001. 001. 001. 001. 801. 001. 91.1 91.2 91.3 91.4 91.5 91.6 91.7 91.8 91.9 91.10 91.11 91.12 91.13 91.14 91.16 91.17 91.18 91.19 91.20 91.21 91.22 801.91.23: Purpose Statutory Authorization Shoreland Districts District Application Boundaries Shoreland Classification Land Use Districts Minimum Lot Size and Width Minimum Setback Requirements Building Structure Height Impervious Surface Coverage Residential Density Design Criteria for Structures Shoreland Alterations Administration Residential Planned Unit Development Planned Unit Development District Shoreland Impact Plan/Conditional Use Permit Variance Subdivision/Platting Provisions Notifications to the Department of Natural Resources Effect: of Permit 801.91.1: PURPOSE! The intent of this Section is to reduce the effects of overcrowding, to prevent pollution of waters of the community, to minimize flood damages, to maintain property values, and to maintain natural characteristics of shorelands and adjacent water areas by controlling lot sizes, placement of structures on lots, and alteration of shoreland areas. 801.91.2: STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION* This Section is adopted pursuant to the authorization and policies contained in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 105, Minnesota Regulations, Parts 6120.2500 - 6120.3900, and the planning and zoning enabling legislation in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462. 001.91.3: SHORELAND DISTRICTS* The shorelarids within the City of Wayzata are hereby designated as shoreland districts and the requirements set forth in this Section shall govern development and other activities within these districts. The classification of the shoreland areas shall govern the use, alteration and development of these areas according to said classification as per M.S. 104.405, M.S. and Minnesota Regulations NR 82-84. 001.91.4: DISTRICT APPLICATION* The "S" District shall be applied to and superimposed upon all zoning districts as contained herein as existing or amended by the Zoning Ordinance text and Official Zoning Map. The regulations and requirements imposed by the "S" District shall be in addition to those established for the base zoning districts which jointly apply. Under the joint application of standards, the more restrictive requirements shall apply. 801.91.5: BODNDARIBS: The boundaries of the Shoreland District are esteUblished within the following distances from the ordinary high water mark of the surface water depending on the size of the surface water as indicated on the Wayzata Shoreland District Map. SURFACE WATER Greater chan ten (10) acres Rivers and streams (draining an area greater than two (2) square miles) DISTANCE (FEET)* 1,000 300** * The practical distance may be less whenever the waters involved are bounded by topographical divides which extend landward from the waters for lesser distances and prevent flowage toward the surface water. ♦♦The distance requirement shall be increased to the limit of the floodplain when the floodplain is greater than three hundred (300) feet. 001.91.6: SHORBLAND CLASSIFICATION SYSTBM* The surface waters affected by this Section and which require controlled development of their shoreland (Shoreland District) shall be shown on the map designated as the official "Zoning Map of the City of Wayzata" which is properly approved and made a part of this Section and filed with the Zoning Administrator. Surface waters generally greater than ten (10) acres and given an identification number by the State of Mitmesota shall be defined in Section 801.02.2 of this Ordinance and listed below. Other surface waters affected by this Section, gen-2rally having less than ten (10) acres, shall be classified as storm water treatment and control areas and thus regulated under the provisions of Section 801.92 of this Ordinance. A. Lakes Classification System. SURFACE WATER DISTRIBUTION Geseral Davelopment Lakes: DNR Identification Number Name 27-133 Lake Minnetonka Recreational Development Lakes: DNR Identification Number _Name 27-95 27-130 Gleason Lake Peavey Lake 801.91.7; LAND USE DISTRICTS: The land usei allowable for the Shoreland Overlay District shall follow the permitted interim, accessary, and conditional use designations as :iefined and outlined in the base zone districts, as found in Sections 51-86 of this Ordinance, as may be aunended, referred to as the Wayzata Zoning Regulations, and shall be properly delineated on the Official Zoning Map for the shorelands of Wayzata. These land use districts are in conformance with the criteria specified in Minnesota Regulation, Part 6120.3200, Subp. 3. 801.91.8; MINIMOM LOT SIZE AND WIDTH: The following chart sets forth the minimum lot sizes and width standards within the Shoreland Overlay District. Where these standards conflict with tjie standards of the base zoning districts, the more restrictive standard shall prevail: RD Recreational Development GD General Development Area Width Width A. 1. Density (R-IA, R-1, Riparian Lots R-2A, R-2,R-3A,R-3, R-4A, R-4, R-5) Single 20,000 75 10,000 75 Duplex 35,000 100 26,000 100 Triplex 50,000 125 38,000 125 Quad 65,000 150 49,000 150 i At-—---It I •- B. C. D. E. F. RD Recreational Development GD General Development 2.Non-Riparian Lots Area Width Area Wid Single 15,000 75 10,000 75 Duplex 26,000 100 17,500 100 Triplex 38,000 125 25,000 125 Quad 49,000 150 32,500 150 Institutional (INS) - (See Section 801.70, INS Institutional District of this Ordinance). Commercial (C*l, C-2, C-3, C-4, C-4A, C-4B) 801.75 - 801.80 of this Ordinance). (See Sections Research and Development (RD) - (See Section 801.85 Research and Development District of this Ordinance). Business/Warehousing (B-W) - (See Section Business/Warehouse District of this Ordinance). 801.86 Substandard Lots of Record. Any lot of record filed in the office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds on or before 1 January 1983, which does not meet the dimensional recjuirements of this Ordinance may be allowed as a building site subject to approval of a shoreland impact plan/conditional use permit, as provided in Section 801.91.19 of this Ordinance and provided: 1.The lot meets all standards of the applicadsle base zoning district. 2. 3. The lot is in separate ownership from eJDutting lands. All dimensional requirements of the Shoreland Overlay District are complied with insofar as practical in compllcuice with requirements for legal non-conforming lots found in Section 801.15.2.M of this Ordinance. NOTE:Lots developed with five (5) or more dwelling units require approval of a planned unit development conditional use in accordance with Section 801.33 and 801.91.17 of this Ordinance. ....... 801.91.9: MINIMDM SETBACK REQUIREMENT: The following chart sets forth the mnimum setback standards within the Shoreland Overlay District. Where these standards conflict with the standards of the base zoning districts, the more restrictive standard shall prevail: RD Recreational Development GD General Development A.Setback from Ordinary High Water Mark 1.Structures Sewered 75 feet 75 feet B. C. Side Yard Setbacks (Subject to individual district requirements.) Additional Structure Setbacks 1.Top of Bluff 30 feet 30 feet 2. 3. Unplatted Cemetery Right-Of-Way Line of Federal, State, 50 feet 50 feet 4. or County Highway Right-Of-Way Line of Public Street, or Other Roads or 30 feet 30 feet Streets Not Classified (Subject to individual requ irement s) district NOTE: Setback requirements from the ordinary high water mark shall not apply to boathouses, piers, and docks. Where structures exist on the adjoining lots of both sides of a proposed building site, the provisions of Section 801.19.5.B. of this Ordinance shall apply. 801.91.10:BUILDING/STRUCTDRE HEIGHT: The minimum building structure height for either lake classification shall follow the individual district requirements of the base zoning districts but shall not exceed 35 feet. Building heights of over 35 feet may be allowed through approval of a shoreland impact plan/conditional use permit as regulated tinder Section 801.91.19 of this Ordinance. £ i 801.91.11:IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE: A. Allowable Coverage. 1.Impervious surface coverage for lots in all zoning districts shall not exceed twenty-five (25) percent of the lot area, except as provided below: a.Where appropriate and whe-^e structures and practices are in place for the treatment of storm water runoff and/or prevent storm water from directly entering a public water in compliance with the Stormwater Management Plan for the City of Wavzata. May 1988 as may be amended, or as approved by the City Engineer, impervious surface coverage may be allowed to exceed twenty-five (25) percent impervious surface coverage to a maximum of seventy-five (75) percent on any one site. b.Impervious surface coverage may be allowed to exceed seventy-five (75) percent of the total lot area when the following stipulations are met: (1) All structures and practices are in place for the treatment of storm water runoff. (2)A shoreland impact plan/conditional use permit is submitted and approved as provided for in Section 801.91.19.A of this Ordinance, subject to the conditions listed in Section 801.91.19.C of this Ordinance. 2.Measures for the treatment of storm water runoff euid/or prevention of storm water from directly entering a public water include such appurtenances as sediment basins (debris basins, desilting basins, or silt traps), installation of debris guards and microsilt basins on storm sewer inlets, oil s)cimming devices, etc. 801.91.12:RESIDENTIAL DENSITY: In cases where the residential density requirements, as specified in Section 801.91.8 of this Ordinance, shall be exceeded, the meocimum allowed densicy shall be that set forth by the base zoning district of the subject property. For high density residential, including planned unit development, the density may not exceed the density standards as specified in the R-5 District provided in Section 801.59 of this Ordinance. Development which exceeds the residential density requirements, as specified in Section 801.91.8 of this Ordinance, shall be in conformance with the Shoreland Management Plan and subject to a conditional use permit and shoreland impact plan set forth in Section 801.91.19., subject to the conditions listed in Section 801.91.19.D of this Ordinance and subject to approval of the plan by the Minnehaha Cree)c Watershed District and the City Engineer. i 801.91.13:DESIGN CRITERIA FOR STRUCTURES: A. Design Criteria for Structures 1.High Water Elevations. Structures shall be placed in accordance with any floodplain regulations applicable to the site. Where these controls do not exist, the elevation to which the lowest floor, including basement, is placed or flood-proofed shall be determined as follows; a.For lakes, by placing the lowest floor at a level at least three (3) feet above the highest known water level, or three (3) feet above the ordinary high water level, whichever is higher; b.For rivers and streauns, by placing the lowest floor at least three (3) feet above the flood of record, if data is availaible. If data is net available, by placing the lowest floor at least three (3) feet above the ordinary high water level, or by conducting a technical evaluation to determine effects of proposed construction upon flood stages and flood flows and to establish a flood protection elevation. Under all three approaches, technical evaluations shall be done by a qualified engineer or hydrologist consistent with Minnesota Statutes Parts 6120.500 to 6120.6200 governing the management of floodplain areas. If more than one approach is used, the highest flood protection elevation determined shall be used for placing structures and other facilities; and c.Water-oriented accessory structures may have the lowest floor placed lower than the determined elevation if the structure is constructed of flood- resistant materials to the elevation, electrical and mechanical equipment is placed adDOve the determined elevation and, if long duration flooding is anticipated, the structure is built to withstand ice action and wind-driven waves and debris. B.Water-Oriented Accessory Structures. As may be allowed by the respective base zoning district, each lot may have one water- oriented accessory structure not meeting the normal structure setback in Section 801.91.9 of this Ordinance if this water- oriented accessory structure complies with the following provisions: 7 1.'Hie structure or facility shall not exceed ten (10) feet in height, exclusive of safety rails, and cannot occupy an area greater than two hundred fifty (250) square feet. Detached decks shall not exceed eight (8) feet above grade at any point; 2.The setback of the structure or facility from the ordinary high water level shall be at least ten (10) feet; 3.The structure or facility shall be treated to reduce visibility as viewed from public waters and adjacent shorelands by vegetation, topography, increased setbacks or color, assuming summer, leaf-on conditions; 4.The roof may be used as a deck with safety rails, but shall not be enclosed or used as a storage area; 5.The structure or facility shall not be designed or used for htiman habitation and shall not contain water supply or sewer treatment facilities; and 6.As an alternative for general development and recreational development water bodies, water-oriented accessory structures used solely for watercraft storage, and including storage of related boating emd water- oriented sporting equipment, may occupy an area up to four hundred (400) square feet, provided the maximum width of the structure shall be twenty (20) feet as measured parallel to the configuration of the shoreline. C.Stairways. Lifts, and Landings. Stairways cuid lifts are the preferred alternative to major topographic alterations for achieving access up and down bluffs and steep slopes to shore areas. Stairways and lifts shall meet the following design requirements: 1.Stairways and lifts shall not exceed four (4) feet in width on residential lots. Wider stairways may be used for commercial properties, and planned unit developments; 2.Landings for stairways and lifts on residential lots shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in area. Landings larger than thirty-two (32) square feet may be used for commercial properties, public open space recreational properties, and planned unit developments; 3.Canopies or roofs shall lifts, or landings; not be allowed on stairways. 4.Stairways, lifts, and landings may be either constructed above the ground on posts or pilings, or placed into the ground, provided they are designed and built in a manner that ensures control of soil erosion; 8 — 5. Stairways, lifts, and landings shall be located in the most visually inconspicuous portions of lots, as viewed from the surface of the public waters assuming summer, leaf-on conditions, whenever practical; and 6. Facilities such as ramps, lifts, or mobility paths for physically handicapped persons shall also be allowed for achieving access to shore areas, provided that the dimensional and performance standards of items (1) to (5) listed above are complied with in addition to the requirements of Minnesota Regulations, Chapter 1340. D. Significant Historic Sites. No structure may be placed on a significant historic site in a manner that affects the values of the site unless adequate information about the site has been documented in a public repository. E. Steep Slopes. The Zoning Administrator shall evaluate possible soil erosion impacts and development visibility from public, waters before issuing a permit for construction of roads, driveways, structures, or other improvements c.n steep slopes. When determined necessary, conditions shall be attached to permits to prevent erosion and preserve existing vegetation screening of structures, vehicles, and other facilities as viewed from the surface of public waters, assuming summer, leaf-on vegetation. F. Bluff Impact Zones. Structure.- and accessory facilities, except stairways and landings, shall not be placed within bluff impact zones. G. Standards for Commercial. Industrial. Public, and Semi-Public Uses. 1. Surface water-oriented commercial uses and industrial, public, or semi-public uses with similar needs to have access to and use of public waters may be located on parcels or lots with frontage on public waters. Those uses with water-oriented needs shall meet the following standards: a. In addition to meeting impervious coverage limits, setbacks, and other zoning standards in this Ordinance, the uses shall be designed to incorporate topographic and vegetative screening of parking areas and structures. b. Uses that require short term watercraft mooring for patrons shall centralize these facilities and design them to avoid obstructions of navigation and to be the minimum size necessary to meet the need. c. Uses that depend on patrons arriving by watercraft may use signs and lighting to convey needed information to the public, subject to the following general standards: (1) No advertising signs or supporting facilities for signs shall be placed in or upon public waters. Signs conveying information or safety messages shall be placed in or on public waters by a public authority or under a permit issued by the County Sheriff. (2) Signs may be placed, when necessary, within the shore impact zone if they are designed and sized to be the minimum necessary to convey needed information. They shall only convey the location and name of the establishment and the general types of goods or services available. The signs shall not contain other detailed information such as product brands and prices, shall be in conformance with Section 801.27 of this Ordinance, but under no circumstance shall they be located higher than ten (10) feet aibove the ground, and shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in size. If illuminated by artificial lights, the lights shall be shielded or directed to prevent excessive illumination out across public waters or on shore. (3) Other outside lighting may be Ic: ted within the shore impact zone or over public waters if it is used primarily to illuminate potential safety hazards and is shielded or otherwise directed to prevent excessive illumination out across public waters or on shore. This does not preclude use of navigational lights. 2. Uses without water-oriented needs shall be located on lots or parcels without public waters frontage, or if located on lots or parcels with public waters frontage, shall either be set back double the normal ordinary high water level setback or be substantially screened from view from the water by vegetation or topography, assiaming summer leaf on conditions. 801.91.14:SHORELAND ALTERATIONS: Alterations of vegetation and topography shall be regulated to prevent erosion into public waters, fix nutrients, preseirve shoreland aesthetics, preserve historic values, prevent bank slumping, and protect fish and wildlife habitat. A. Vegetation Alterations. 1.Vegetation alteration necessary for the construction of structures and the construction of roads and parking areas regulated by Section 801.91.14.C of this Ordinance are exempt from the vegetation alteration standards that follow. 2.Removal or alteration of vegetation shall be allowed subject to the following standards: a.Intensive vegetation clearing within the shore and bluff impact zones and on steep slopes shall not be allowed. b.In shore and bluff impact zones and on steep slopes, limited clearing of trees and shrubs and cutting, pruning, and trimming of trees shall be allowed to provide a view to the water from the principal dwelling site and to accommodate the placement of stairways and landings, picnic areas, access paths, beach and watercraft access areas, and permitted water-oriented accessory structures or facilities, provided that: (1)The screening of structures, vehicles, or other facilities as viewed from the water, assuming summer, leaf-on conditions, shall not be substantially reduced; (2)The above provisions are not applicable to the removal of trees, limbs, or branches that are dead, diseased, or pose safety hazards. B. Topographic Alterations/Gradina and Filling. 1.Grading and filling, and excavations necessary for the construction of structures, and driveways under approved construction permits for these facilities shall not require the issuance of a separate grading and filling permit. However, the grading and filling standards in this section shall be incorporated into the issuance of permits for construction of structures, and driveways. __ _^ 2.Notwil:hstanding items 1 and 2 above, a shoreland permit shall be required from the Zoning Administrator for: a.The movement of more than ten (10) cubic yards of material on steep slopes or within shore or bluff impact zones; and b.The movement of more than fifty (50) cubic yards of material outside of steep slopes and shore and bluff impact zones. 3.The following considerations and conditions shall be adhered to during the issuance of permits, conditional use permits, variances and subdivision approvals; a. b. Grading or filling in any type 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 wetland shall be evaluated to determine how extensively the proposed activity would affect the following functional qualities of the wetland:* (1) Sediment and pollution trapping and retention; (2) Storage of surface -unoff to prevent or reduce flood dcunage; (3) Fish and wildlife habitat; (4) Recreational use; (5) Shoreline or ban)c stabilization; and (6)Noteworthiness, including special qualities such v-3 historic significance, critical habitat for endangered plants and animals, or others. *This evaluation shall also include a determination of whether the wetland alteration being proposed requires pemits, reviews, or approvals by other local, state, or federal agencies such as the Minnehaha Cree)c Watershed District, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, or the United States Army Corps of Engineers. The applicant shall be so advised. Alterations shall be designed and conducted in a manner that ensures only the smallest amount of bare ground is exposed for the shortest time possible; i c. d. e. f. h. i. k. Mulches or similar materials shall be used, where necessary, for tempora^'y bare soil coverage, and permanent vegetation cover shall be established as soon as possible. Methods to minimize soil erosion and to trap sediments before they reach any surface water feature shall be used; Altered areas shall be stabilized to acceptable erosion control standards consistent with the field office technical guides of the local soil and water conservation dist^^icts and the United States Soil Conservation Service; Fill or excavation material shall not be placed in a manner that creates an unstable slope; Plans to place fill or excavate material on steep slopes shall be reviewed by qualified professionals for continued slope stability and shall not create finished slopes of 30 percent or greater; Fill or excavated material shall not be placed in bluff impact zones; Any alterations below the ordinary high water level of public waters shall first be authorized by the Commissioner under Minnesota Statutes, Section 105.42. Alterations of topography shall only be allowed if they are accessory to permitted or conditional uses and shall not adversely affect adjacent or nearby properties; and Placement of natural rock riprap, including associated grading of the shoreline and placement of a filter blanket, shall be permitted if the finished slope does not exceed three feet horizontal to one foot vertical, and the landward extent of the riprap is within ten (10) feet of the ordinary high water level, and the height of the riprap above the ordinary high water level does not exceed three (3) feet. 4.Connections to Public Waters. Excavation where the intended purpose is connection to a public water, such as boat slips, canals, lagoons, and harbors, shall be controlled by local shoreland controls. Permission for excavations may be given only after the Commissioner has approved the proposed connection to public waters. ‘ h % « 'V.* .-.-ii*!!! I . A . ■ kite J C. Placement and Design of Roads. Driveways, and Parking Areas. D. 1.Public and private roads and parking areas shall be designed to take advantage of natural vegetation and topography to achieve maximum screening from view from public waters. Documentation shall be provided by a qualified individual that all roads and parking areas are designed and constructed to minimize and control erosion to public waters consistent with the guidelines of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. 2.Roads, driveways, and parking areas shall meet structure setbacks and shall not be placed within bluff and shore impact zones, when other reasonable and feasible placement alternatives exist. If no alternatives exist, they may be placed within these areas, and shall be designed to minimize adverse impacts. 3.Public and private watercraft access ramps, approach roads, and access-related parking areas shall be placed within shore impact zones provided the vegetative screening and erosion control conditions of this sub-part are met. For private facilities, the grading and filling provisions of Section 001.91.14.B of this Ordinance shall be met. Storm Water Management. All development within the Shoreland Overlay District shall be consistent with the Stormwater Management Plan for the City of Wavzata. May 1988 as may be amended and the following general and specific standards; 1. General Standards. a.When possible, existing natural drainageways, wetlands, and vegetated soil surfaces shall be used to convey, store, filter, and retain storm water runoff before discharge to public waters. b.Development shall be planned and conducted in a manner that will minimize the extent of disturbed areas, runoff velocities, erosion potential, and reduce and delay runoff volumes. Disturbed areas shall be stabilized and protected as soon as possible and facilities or methods used to retain sediment on the site. c.When development density, topographic features, and soil and vegetation conditions are not sufficient to adequately handle storm water runoff using natural features and /egetation, various types of constructed facilities such as diversions, settling basins, skimming devices, dikes, waterways, and ponds may be used. Preference must be given to designs using surface drainage, vegetation, and ► infiltration rather than buried pipes and man-made materials and facilities. E. Specific Standards. 1.When constructed facilities are used for storm water management, documentation shall be provided by a qualified individual that they are designed and installed consistent with the field guidelines of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. 2.Newly constructed storm water outfalls to public waters shall provide for filtering or settling of suspended solids and skimming of surface debris before discharge. 801.91.15:NON-CONFORMITIES: All legally established non­ conformities as of the date of this Ordinance may continue, but they shall be managed according to applicaUole state statutes and regulations of Section 801.15 of this Ordinance regulating non-conformities for the subjects of alterations and additions, repair after damage, discontinuance of use, and intensification of use, except that the following t: andards shall also apply in shoreland areas: A. Additional/Expansions to Non-Conforming Structures. 1.All additions or expansion* -.o “he outside dim.ensions of an existing non-conforming structure shall meet the setback, height, and other requirements of Section 801.91.8, 801.91.9 and 801.91.10 of this Ordinance. Any deviation from these requirements shall be authorized by a variance pursuant to Section 801.91.20 of this Ordinance. 2.Deck additions may be allowed without a variance to a structure not meeting the required setback from the ordinary high water level if all of the following criteria and standards are met: a.The structure existed on the date the structure setbacks were established; b.A thorough evaluation of the property and stiructure reveals no reasonable location for a deck meeting or exceeding the existing ordinary high water level setback of the structure. c.The deck encroachment toward the ordinary high water level does not exceed fifteen (15) percent of the existing setback of the structure from the ordinary high water level or does not encroach closer than thirty (30) feet, whichever is more restrictive; and d. The deck is constructed primarily of wood, and is not roofed or screened. 801.91.16:ADMINISTRATIOH: A. Compliance. The use of any shoreland of public waters; the size and shape of lots; the use, size, type and location of structures on lots; the installation and maintenance of water supply and waste removal systems, the grading and filling of any shoreleuid area; the cutting of shoreland vegetation; and the subdivision of land shall be in full compliance with the terms of this Section and Ordinance and other applicable regulations. In cases where standards conflict with the standards of the base zoning districts, the more restrictive standard will prevail. B. Relationship to Floodplain. Placement of all structures shall comply with Section 801.92 of this Ordinance. C. Shoreland Permits Required. A shoreland permit shall be req'uired for the construction of buildings or building additions (and including such related activities as constx'oction of decks and signs), and those grading and filling activities not exempted by Section 801.91.14.B of this Ordinance. Application for a permit shall be made to the Zoning Administrator on the forms provided. D. Certificate of Zoning Compliance. The Zoning Administrator shall issue a certificate of occupancy as regulated by Section 801.07 of this Ordinance upon compliance with each activity requiring a shoreland permit as specified in Section 601.91.16.C of this Ordinance. Any use, arrangement, or construction at variance with that authorized by permit shall be deemed a violation of this Section and shall be punishable as provided in Section 801.08 of this Ordinance. 601.91.17:RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD): Residential planned unit development conditional uses are allowed for new projects on undeveloped land, redevelopment of previous built sites or conversion of existing buildings and land. All lots developed with five (5) or more dwelling units require approval of a planned unit development conditional use in compliance with this Ordinance. Planned unit development shall comply with the following criteria: A. Residential planned unit development shall be processed as a conditional use in accordance with Section 801.33 of this Ordinance. B. Application for a residential planned unit development shall follow the guidelines in Section 801.33 of this Ordinance. c.Site "Suitable Area" Evaluation. Proposed residential planned unit developments shall be evaluated using the following procedures and standards to determine the suitable area for the dwelling unit/dwelling site density evaluation in Section 801.91.17.D, E, and F of this Ordinance. 1.The development parcel shall be divided into tiers by locating one or more lines approximately parallel to a line that identifies the ordinary high water level at the following intervals, proceeding landward: Shoreland Tier Dimensions Sewered (Feet) General DevelopiT'.snt Lakes - First Tier General Development Lakes - Second and Additional Tiers Recreational Development Lakes 200 200 267 •The suitable area within each tier is next calculated by excluding from the tier area all wetlands, bluffs, or land before the ordinary high water level of public waters. This suitable area and the proposed development are then subjected to the residential planned unit development density evaluation steps to arrive at an allowable nximber of dwelling units or sites. D.PUD Density Evaluation. The procedures for determining the "base" density of a PUD and density increase multipliers are as follows. Allowable densities may be treuisferred from any tier to any other tier further from the water body, but shall not be transferred to any other tier closer. E. PUD "Base" Density Evaluation. The suitable area within each tier is divided by the single residential lot size standard for lakes. Proposed locations and numbers of dwelling units or sites for the res-dential planned unit developments are then compared with the tier, density, and suitability analyses herein and the design criteria in Section 801.91.18.G of this Ordinance. F. Density Increase Multipliers. 1.Increases to the dwelling unit or dwelling site base densities previously determined shall be allowed if the dimensional standards in Section 801.91.8 of this Ordinance are met or exceeded and the design criteria in Section 801.91.17.G of this Ordinance are satisfied. The allowable density increases in item (2) below shall only be allowed if structure setbacks from the ordinary high water level are increased to at least fifty (50) percent 2. greater than the minimum setback, or the impact on the water body is reduced an equivalent amount through vegetative management, topography, or additional means acceptable to the local unit of government and the setback is at least twenty-five (25) percent greater than the minimum setback. Allowable dwelling unit or dwelling site density increases for planned unit development: Density Evaluation Tiers First Second Third Fourth Fifth Maximum Density Increase Within Each Tier (Percent) 50 100 200 200 200 G. Maintenance and Design Criteria. 1. Before final approval of a residential planned unit development, adequate provisions shall be developed for preservation and maintenance in perpetuity of open spaces and for the continued existence and functioning of the development. 2. Open Space Preservation. Deed restrictions, covenants, permanent easements, public dedication and acceptance, or other equally effective and permanent means shall be provided lo ensure long-term preservation and maintenance of open space. The instruments shall include all of the following protections: a. Commercial use prohibited (for residential PUDs); b. Vegetation and topographic alterations other than routine maintenance prohibited; c. Construction of additional buildings or storage of vehicles and other materials prohibited; and d. Uncontrolled beaching of watercraft prohibited. 3. Development organization and functioning. Unless an equally effective alternative community frcimework is established, when applicable, all residential planned unit developments shall use an owners association with the following features: a.Membership shall be mandatory for each dwelling unit or site purchaser and any successive purchasers; H. I. b.Each merrber shall pay a pro rata share of the association's expenses, and unpaid assessments can become liens on units or sites; c.Assessments shall be adjustable to accommodate changing conditions; and d.The association shall be responsible for insurance, taxes, and maintenance of all commonly owned property and facilities. 0]:i>n Space Requirements. Residential planned unit developments shall contain open space meetir’g the following criteria: 1.At least thirty (30) percent of the total development area shall be preserved as open space; 2.Dwelling units or sites, land covered by road surfaces, parlcing areas, or structures are developed areas and shall not be included in the computation of minimum open space; 3.Open space shall include areas with physical characteristics unsuitable for development in their natural state, and areas containing significant historic sites or unplatted cemeteries; 4.The appearance of open space areas, including topography, vegetation, and allowable uses,shall be preserved by use of restrictive deed covenants, permanent easements, public dedication and acceptance, or other equal effective and permanent means; and 5.The shore impact zone, based on normal structure setbacks, shall be included as open space. For residential PUDs, at least fifty (50) percent of the shore impact zone area of existing developments or at least seventy (70) percent of the shore impact zone area of new developments shall be preserved in its natural or existing state. Erosion Control and Storm Water Management. Erosion control and storm water management plans shall be developed and the residential planned unit development shall: 1.Be designed,and the construction managed, to minimize the likelihood of serious erosion occurring either during or after construction. This shall be accomplished by limiting the eunount and length of time of bare ground exposure. Temporary ground covers, sediment entrapment facilities, vegetated buffer strips, or other appropriate techniques shall be used to minimize erosion impacts on surface water features. Erosion control plans approved .., 2. by a soil and water conservation district may be required if project size and site physical characteristics warrant; and Be designed and constructed to effectively manage reasonably expected quantities and qualities of storm water runoff. J. Centralization and Design of Facilities. Centralization and design of facilities and structures shall be done according to the following standards: 1. Dwelling units or sites shall be clustered into one or more groups and located on suitcible areas of the development. They shall be designed and located to meet or exceed the following dimensional standards for the relevant shoreland classification: setback from the ordinary high water level, elevation above the surface water features, and maximum height. Setbacks from the ordinary high water level shall be increased in accordance with Section 801.91.17.F of this Ordinance for developments with density increases; 2. Structures, parking areas, and other facilities shall be treated to reduce visibility as viewed from piiblic waters and adjacent shorelands by vegetation, topography, increased setbacks, or color, assuming summer, leaf-on conditions. Vegetative and topographic screening shall be preserved, if existing, or may be required to be provided; 3. Accessory structures and facilities shall meet the required principal structure setback emd shall be centralized. 801.91.18:PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT: Mixed use planned unit development is allowed for integreiLion and coordination of land parcels as well as the combination of varying types of residential and commercial uses: A. Application/Procedures. Applications and procedures for a planned unit development district in the shoreland area shall be consistent with Sections 801.90, 801 ! and 801.91.17 regarding planned unit development. The DI'a <11 be notified of rezoning to a PUD as required in Section aol.91.22. 801.91.19:SHORELAND IMPACT PLAN/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: A. C. Shoreland Impact Plan, Except for situations listed below, landowners or developers desiring to develop land or construct any dwelling or any other artificial obstruction on land located within any Shoreland District within the City of Wayzata shall first submit a conditional use permit application as regulated by Section 801.04 of this Ordinance and a plan of development, hereinafter referred to as "Shoreland Impact Plan", which shall set forth proposed provisions for sediment control, water management, maintenance of landscaped features, and any additional matters intended to set forth proposed changes rec[uested by the applicant and affirmatively disclose what, if any, change will be made in the natural condition of the earth, including loss of change of earth ground cover, destruction of trees, grade courses and marshes. The plan shall minimize tree removal, ground cover change, loss of natural vegetation, and grade changes as much as possible, and shall affirmatively provide for the relocation or replanting of as many trees as possible which are proposed to be removed. The purpose of the shoreland impact plan shall be to eliminate and minimize as much as possible potential pollution, erosion and siltation. B. Exceptions. 1.No conditional use permit or shoreland impact plan shall be required for the development of permitted accessory uses contained within the R-IA, R-l, R-2 and R-3 Districts. 2.No conditional use permit or s .oreland impact plan shall be required for the development of permitted principal uses contained within the zoning districts, provided that such uses are constructed on standard lots and in compliance with the standards of this Ordinance and that all such uses are serviced with public sanitary sewer. Conditions. All conditional use permits for consideration under this Section shall be subject to the following stipulations: 1.The projects shall be analyzed to determine the impact of impervious surfaces, storm water runoff, floodplain, and water quality implications. Only those projects shall be allowed where the adverse impacts have been mitigated through approved means to the extent possible. I L t I'W * I ' r w ■ • . 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Storm water treatment measures including, but not limited to, sediment basins (debris bas’.is), desilting basins or silt traps, installation of debris guards, and microsilt basins on storm water inlets, oil skimming devices, etc. shall be required subject to the review of the City- Engineer and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District on projects where applicable. Projects shall be analyzed in terms of provisions for maintenance and enhancement of landscape features, and change in the natural condition of the soil, trees, grade courses and marshes. The vegetative planting plan shall contain trees, when fully mature, that will exceed the building height. The plan shall also minimize tree removal, ground cover change, loss of natural vegetation, and grade chamges as much as possible. It shall further provide for the relocation or replanting of trees which are proposed to be removed. Projects shall be analyzed in terms of the appearance of the structure when viewed from the lake's surface. Building materials, and color shall be analyzed to determine which facade and roof materials minimize the appearance and blend the structure into the shoreland and vegetation. Building heights shall be analyzed to determine the impact on surrounding structures and views from the lake surface or other shores. Structures shall not be allowed to exceed a height beyond what is allowed by the base zoning district or cannot be screened by landscaping or other design measures. Residential densities on a project basis shall not be allowed to exceed the iraximum allowed density of the base zoning district for which the project is proposed. For higher density residential development and planned unit developments, the density shall not be allowed to exceed the density standards as specifiad in the R-5 District of this Ordinance. Lot coverage on a project basis shall be restricted to the provisions for maccimum impervious surface coverage as provided for in this Ordinance. Overall residential densities in the shoreland area shall not ^ exceed the surplus development capacity for residential density, as calculated for Lake Minnetonka, Gleason and Peavey Lakes, as specified in the Wayzata Comprehensive Plan/Shoreland Management Plan, as may be amended. 9.Overall lot coverage in the shoreland area shall not exceed the surplus development capacity for impervious surface coverage calculated for Lake Minnetonka, Gleason and Peavey Lakes, as specified in the Wayzata Comprehensive Plan/Shoreland Management Plan, as may be amended. 10.All projects shall be in conformance with the Stormwater Management Plan for the City of Wavzata. May 1988, as may be amended and/or approved by the City Engineer. 11.All projects shall be in conformance with the Wayzata Comprehensive Plan/Shoreland Management Plan, as may be amended. 12.All projects shall be subject to the review of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. 801.91.20:VARIANCE* Variances may be granted by the City Council in accordance with Section 801.05 of this Ordinance in extraordinary cases, but only when the proposed use is determined to be in the public interest. The following additional criteria shall apply within shoreland areas: A.Result in the placement of an artificial obstruction which shall restrict the passage of storm and flood water in such a manner as to increase the height of flooding, except obstructions approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in conjunction with sound floodplain management. B.Result in incompatible land uses or which shall be detrimental to the protection of surface and ground water supplies. C.Be not in keeping with land use plans and planning objectives for the City of Wayzata or which shall increase or cause danger to life or property. D.Be inconsistent with the objectives of encouraging land uses compatible with the preservation of the natural land forms, vegetation and the marshes and wetlands within the City of Wayzata. E.Shall constitute a hardship as defined in Section 801.05 of this Ordinance. F.No permit or variance shall be issued unless the applicant has submitted a Shoreland Impact Plan as required and set forth in this Ordinance. In granting any variance, the City Council may attach such conditions as they deem necessary to insure compliance with the purpose and intent of this Section. 1 801.91.21:SUBDIVISION/PLATTING PROVISIONS: A. Land Suitability. Each lot created through subdivision, including planned unit developments authorized under Section 001.91.17 of this Ordinance, shall be suitable in its natural state _ for the proposed use with minimal alteration. Suitability analysis by the local unit of government shall consider susceptibility to flooding, existence of wetlands, soil and susceptibility to flooding, existence of wetlands, soil and rock formations with severe limitations for development, severe erosion potential, steep topography, inadequate water supply or sewage removal capabilities, near shore aquatic conditions unsuitaUDle for water based recreation, important fish and wildlife habitat, presence of significant historic sites, or any other feature of the natural land likely to be harmful to the health, safety, or welfare of future residents of the proposed subdivision or of the community. B- Consistency with Other Controls. Subdivisions shall conform to all provisions for subdivision, found as Chapter 805 of the Wayzata Subdivision Regulations. A subdivision shall not be approved where a later variance from one or more standards in official controls would be needed to use the lots for their intended purposes. C. Information Requirements. Sufficient information must be submitted by the applicant for the community to make a determination of land suitability. The information shall include the provisions found as Chapter 805 and the following additional evaluation criteria and conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. The surface water features required in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.02, Subdivision 1, to be shown on plats; Information regarding adequacy of domestic water supply; extent of anticipated vegetation and topographic alterations; near-shore aquatic conditions, including depths, types of bottom sediments, and aquatic vegetation; and aquatic vegetation> and proposed methods for controlling storm water runoff and erosion, both during cind after construction activities; Location of 100-year floodplain areas and floodway districts from existing adopted maps or data; and A line or contour representing the ordinary high water level, the "toe" and the "top" of bluffs, and the minimxmi building setback distances from the top of the bluff and the lake or stream. 24 D.Dedications. When a land or easement dedication is a condition of subdivision approval, the approval shall provide easements over natural drainage or ponding areas for management of storm water and significant wetlands. 801.91.22:NOTIFICATIONS TO THE DEPARTMENT OP NATURAL RESOURCES: A.Copies of all notices of any public hearings to consider subdivisions/plats, variances, amendments, or conditional uses resulting from the requirements of Section 801.91 of this Ordinance shall be sent to the Commissioner or the Commissioner's designated representative and postmarked at least ten (10) days before the hearings. Notices of hearings to consider proposed subdivisions/plats shall include copies of the subdivision/plat. B.A copy of approved amendments and subdivisions/plats, and final decisions granting variances or conditional uses under this Shoreland Ordinance shall be sent to the Commissioner or the Commissioner's designated representative and postmarked within ten (10) days of final action. 801.91.23:EFFECT OP PERMIT: The granting of any permit, variance or subdivision approval under provisions of this Ordinance shall in no way affect the owner's capability to obtain the approval required by any other statute, ordinance or legislation of any state agency or subdivision thereof. Approval may be expressly given in conjunction with other permits applied for, but no approval shall be implied from the grant of such permits nor from the necessity to apply for a permit as described herein. •• •f 1 Wayzata Zoning Ordinance Chapter 301 Adopted April 199^ Setback: The minimum horizontal distance between a structure and the property ’ nearest thereto; within Shoreland Districts It shall also mean the minimum horizontal distance hetv* cen a structure or a sewage treatment system and the ordinary high water level. For purposes of ca in shelter buildings only, above grade portions shall be used in determining setback requirements. D stances are to be measured from the most outwardly extended portion of the structure at ground level, except as provided herein after. Shopping Center: An l.ntegrated grouping of commercial stores, under single ownership or control. Shoreland Related; 1. Bluff: A topor hit leature such as a hill, cliff, or embankment hav inq ihe loilcw ’ng characteristics (an area with an average slope of less than 18 percent ever a d's'ance tor 50 feet or more shall not be considered part of the bluff): a. Part of all of the feature is located in a shoreland area. b The slope rises at least 25 feet above the ordinary high water level of th? >vaterbody. c. The grade of the slope from the toe of the bluff to a point 25 feet or more above the ordinary high water level averages 30 percent or greater. d. The slope must drain toward the waterbody. 2. Bluff Impact Zone: A bluff and land located within twenty (20) feet from the top of a bluff. 3. Boathouse: A structure designed and used primarily for the storage of boats or boating equipment. 4. Commercial Planned Unit Development: Uses that provide transient, short-term ..ing spacer;, rooms, or parcels and their operations are essentially service-oriented. For example, hotel/motel accomr^udations, resorts, recreational vehicle and camping parks, and other primarily service-oriented activities are commercial planned unit developments. 5 Commissioner The Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources. 6. Deck: A horizontal, unerKlosed platform with or without attached railings, seats, trellises, or other features, attached or functionally related to a principal use or site and at any point extending more than three feet above ground. 7. Guest Cottage: A structure used as a dwelling uni that may contain sleeping spaces and kitchen and bathroom facilities in addition to those provided in the primary dwelling unit on a lot. 8. Intensive Vegetation Clearing: The complete removal of trees or shrubs in a contiguous patch, strip, row or block. 9. Ordinary High Water Level: The boundary of public waters and wetlands, and shall be an elevation delineating the highest water level which has been maintained for a sufficient period of time to leave evidence upon the landscape, commonly that point where the natural vegetation changes from predominantly aquatic to prswominantly terrestrial. For watercourses, the ordinary high water level is the elevation of the top of the bank of the channel. For reservoirs and flowage, the ordinary high water level is the operating elevation of the normal summer pool. 10. Public Waters: Any waters as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 103G.005, Subdivisions 14 and 15. However, no lake, pond, or flowage of less than 10 acres in size in municipalities and 25 acres in size in unincorporated areas need be regulated for the purposes of parts 8120.2500 to 6120.3900. A body of water created by a private user where there was rx) previous shoreland may, at the discretion of the local government, be exempted from parts 6120.2500 to 6120.2900. 11. Public Water.*' • General Development (GD): Large, deep lakes or lakes of varying sizes and depths with h:i,,i levels and mixes of existing development. These lakes often are extensively used for recreation and, except for the very large lakes, are heavily developed afound the shore. Second and third tiers of development are fairly common. The larger examples in this class can accommodate additional development and use. 12. Public Waters - Recreational Development (RD): Medium sized lakes of varying depths and shapes with a variety of landform, soil, and ground water situations on the lands around them. April 1992 2 .14 They oiten are characierized by moderate le\'els of recreational use and existing development. Development consists mainly of seasonal and year-round residences and recreationally-oriented commercial uses. Many of these lakes have capacities for accommodating additional development and use. 13. Sensitive Resource Management: The preservation and managemer.! of areas unsuitable for development in their natural state due to constraints such as shallow soils over ground water or bedrock, highly erosive or expansive soils, steep slopes, susceptibility to flooding, or occurrence of flora or fauna in need of special protection. 14. Sewer System: Pipelines or conduits, pumping stations, and force main, and all other constructions, devices, appliances, or appurtenances used for conducting sewage or indcstrial waste or other wastes to a point of ultimate disposal 15. Shore Impact Zone: Land located between the ordinary high water level of a public water and a line paralle. io It at a setback of 50 percent of the structure setback. 16. Shoreland: Land located within the following distances from public waters: 1,000 feet from the ordinary high water level of a lake, pond, or flowage; and 300 feet from a river or stream, or the landvrard extent of a floodplain designated by Ordinance on a river or stream, whichever is greater. The limits of shorelands may be reduced whenever the waters involved are bounded by topographic divides which extend tarxjward from the waters for lesser distartces arxJ when approv^ by the commissioner. 17. Significant Historic Site: Any archaeological site, standing structure, or oth' * property that meets the criteria for eligbility to the National Register of Historic Places or is listed in the State Register of Historic Sites, or is determined to be an unplatted cemetery that falls under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 307.08. A historic site meets these criteria if it is presently listed on either register or if it is determined to meet the quamis^tions for listing after review by the Minnesota State Archaeologist or the Director of the Minnesota Historical Society. All unplatted cemeteries are automatically considered to be signiTicant historic sites. 18. Steep Slope: Land where agricultural activity or development is either not recommended or described as poorly suited due to slope steepness and the site's soil characteristics, as mapped and described in available county soil surveys or other technical reports, unless appropriate design and construction techniques and farmirtg practices are used in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance. Where speciTic information is not available, steep slopes are lands having slopes over 12 percent, as measured over horizontal distances of 50 feet or more, that are not bluffs. 19. Surface Water-Oriented Commerc'al Use: The use of land for commercial purposes, where access to and use of a surface water feature is an integral part of the normal conductance cf business. Marinas, resorts, and restaurants with transient docking facilities are examples of such use. 20. Toe of the Bluff: The point on a bluff where there is. as visually observed, a cleariy identifiable break in the stopr, from gentler to steeper slope above. If no break in the slope Is apparent, the toe of the bluff shall be determine to be the lower end of a 50 foot segment, measured on the ground, with an average slope exceeding 18 percent 21. Top of the Bluff: The point on a bluff where there is, as virtually observed, a cleariy identifiabie break in the slope, from steeper to gentler slope above. If r>o break in the slope is apparent, the top of the bluff shall be determined to be the upper end of a 50 foot segment, measured on the ground, with an average slope exceeding 18 percent. 22. Water-Oriented Accessory Structure or Facility: A small, above ground building or other Improvement, except stairways, fences, docks, and retaining walls, which, because of the relationship of its use to a surface water feature, reasonably needs to be located closer to public waters than the normal structure setback. Examples of such structures and facilities include boathouses, gazebos, screen houses, fish houses, pump houses, and detached decks. Sign Related: April 1992 2.15 M Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk & Associates Cttl' G ‘’6 •ooer X 9c^t^ * -osn?*" C p£ R Coo» <®£ •orer G S».''ur><rt, Pf M Elr' C •Sr*w C;^w-!4rf Engineers & Architects Howva'fi ^ Si^fOfd PE A OofOon P£ RtJCe^ P P*-^-e PE .t <-jk:e- RE Drfv v^ O .r"i«cf4 PE Rooen C •'uiic* A ^ A Bcuioori PE Mart A Hansor P£ V< ►•>«**■ ' Pau*'^4l'^r^ PE >j t PE Thomas R Arxjervjn A A OonaAS C Bun^artA PE ’•nomas E Anguv PE Gar\ ^ Rv arje» ^E vn^ Vjrr ne/ P£ M<*'ae< P Rau P£ V'^' V R'^^ A c P A rw^vx' PC M<»'ar« C Lvry *' P£ Ja^nes R Va^ar>3 p £ jemy O Pp*mch PE p Arn^ervy^ PE V-»'fc R PE Ma»A ^ >ip PE Garv O' Monen PE C?anie« ' Ejgp'TOh PE p*' ic j Casw\^ P£ Mark D Aa 1 p£ Vi:e^ 9 ,p-sa- »£ L P*- 0 G P£ c A e'-e- P§ p >Jd Pcste' p£ Aet ’' R p£ Shawn O Gucaton pe Cef>»«o 0^(v.p' p£ C’^a'^s A E't.tJOn leo M Pas\« u> Hanan V! C sen James R E";e*‘a^ /A August 6, 1992 City of Orono 1335 Brown Road Crystal Bay, MN 55232 wuMCiLMBTi^G , Aue 2 4 992 CITVOFORMO Attention; Mr. John Gerhardson 'AUG 1 0 Re: Stubbs Bay Lift Station Change Order No. 1 File 13937 Dear Mr. Gerhardson: Attached is Change Order No. 1 for the Stubbs Bay Sanitary Sewer project improvements. This change order modifies lift station No. 3 from a grinder station to a non-clog submersible type lift station. This change was previously requested by the City. We recommend the City approve this change order. If you have any questions about this change order please call me at 636-4600. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Daryl Kirschenman Enclosure cc: Harlan Olson, BRA 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636^6 l/1laonMtro0 Owner City of Orono, PO Box 66, Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Date July 8, 1992 mAndtrhk 4 Contractor Progre^ive Contractors, Inc., 8736 21achary Lane, Ossco, MN 55369 OuiQgc Order No. 1 Bond Co.Not available yet CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 Stubbs Bjy Sanil^iry Sewer luiprovcmcnts File No. 13'J37 Deagriptinn nf W»rlr Cbiingc Lift Stulion No. 3 from a duplex grinder station to a duplex Don-clog submersible station. Replace Sheet 25 with Modified Sheet 25. Delete Specification Sections 11113 and 16903. Modify Spec. Sc on 11114 - 1.07.D to read Flygt CP 3102, Impeller 433. 240 volt, 3 phase, 5 HP. Design condition is 100 GPM at 35 feet T.D.H. .lakc the following changes to Specification Section 16904.2.08.B.1 Lift Station No. 3. 240 volt, 3 phase. 4 wire, 60 H/.. and Section 2.08.B.3.b. Lift Station Nos. 2 and 3 shaU both have 60 amp 3 pole interlocking breakers. Power factor capacitors will not be required. 1 I\is change oruer ADDS $9390 to the contract araount. turn Change Order No. 1 Uull Contracl QiMuiilljr Modify Lift Station No. 3 Total Change Order No. I LS Doll Price 93'>0.00 TeUI Amsiinl 9390.00 $9,390.00 Original Contract Amount Previous Change Orders This Change Order No. I - ADD Revised Contract Amount (including this Change Order) I3937.au 1,480,331.95 0.00 9390.00 1,489,721.95 Recommended for Approval by; BONESTRCX). ROSENE, ANDERLDC& ASSOCIATES. IN^ Approved by Contractor: PROGRESSIVE CO Approved by Owner. CITY OF ORONO, MN Dale: JQi&IriillillQQ 1 • Owner 1 • Contractor 1 • Engineer 1 - Bond Co. 13V37.C1IA CO-2 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik& Associates O?T0 G ^6 \JL S'c-.r'y* PE* c Aoor^ k P5 Vrfr,.n c Sc^atJ Pc**jnj € PF Gf^n I? Cocfc P** 6 PE «cc«^ G ScriuTNc*^ P£ M Et'P^ C PA *Sp^iO» Cor*Vk>ff^ Engineers A Architects MOwfcjrj 4 P£ A P£ PDC<r*T P PV^ e P£ P^J^arc \k p£ DavK3 O wi?^hota ^E Stocen C Pusses ♦ a ,e'*V A Acvjr3C>r P£ Vtar% A M^vDo PE VK'ijr ’ Saut'^an'' »£ 7^ K P£ Tnomai « Anoerion a i a Do»’a*d C 8un;afdt p£ *^X>fnas E Ar-^s p£ Gar# P P£ v"aei Var ' ec p£ -Jr » P£ A*^r e» \1 ? r ^ A CP ’’Nvrjl a *??pr^n Pf Vn:'*jr' C P£ j'*^ P \'j P£ .e"\ 0 Pr^ic'' P£ Ar^^'err p Ar-e*-'^-' Pg Vtjm « 9c% PE \ij^A A Sr^ P£ Jl Morrr P£ Gjr ?• J P^^TOn P£ p*^^c J Cjuvr p. \'j t G Aj \ p£ V T-. B .r- .-- »£ ^ P*^: -4) G<Jvr i( P£ Aj*P^ L \Ai -r^pn P£ s *003 Pcsre* P£ ^•r* P Vaco P£ Sravfcr« G GwiU*v>'' < C-c:«<j O’^vip' •£ C^AfiTi A £*v»sor wPO M Pjwvr Ik# M O'iC-" p £'';f **j"3r August 11, 1992 i lilAii City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 AUG 2 4 1392 CITY OF ORONO Attn:Mr. John Gerhardson Re:Stubbs Bay Sanitarv Sewer Project File No. 13937 Dear John: Enclosed please find three (3) copies of Request for PaNinent No. 1 for the above referenced project. This portion of the work has been satisfactorily completed and we recommend payment at this time. If you have any questions, please contact me. Yours very truly. BONESTR Harlan M Olson OSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. HMO:pah Enclosure 13937.COR 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 ^11 aontstfoo Owner City of Orono, 1335 brown Road, Crystal bay, MN 55232 Date August 7, 1992 i Andmirn 4 I'll AssodatM For Period Suirl lo August 7, 1992 Kc4|ucst No. 1 ! 1 CoQtr;ictor Progressive Contractors, Inc., 873t> Zachary I ane, Osseo, MN 55369 -----------------------1 I 1 RHOUrST K)R PAYMliNT Stubbs Hay Sanitary Sewer Improvements FUe No. 13437 SUMMARY 1 Original Contract Amount $1,480,331.95 2 Change Order - Addition $ 3 Change Order • Deduction S 4 Revised Contract Amount $1.480331.95 5 Value Completed to Date s 96,918.04 6 Material on Hand $25,456.46 7 Amount F.arned s 122.374.50 ‘i Less Retainage 5%$6,118.73 9 Sub-Total $116,255.77 10 Less Amount Paid Previously $0.00 11 AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUESF FOR PAYMEN I' NO.1 $116,255.77 Recommemied for Approval by: BONESIHOO, ROSliNl^ ANDERUK & ASSOCIA'IES, INC. Approved by Contriictor: PROGRESSIVE CON-niACrORS, INC Approved by Owner: CHY OF ORONO, MN Specified Contract Completion Date: OcTOBHR 15, 1992; July 31, 1993 Date: 1.W37 HI I* IlM Uuil Cuatnct QiUfllily Uoil IVicc Quaniily lb Ualc AmtMini Tu Ujic RID - Slubhs Bay Northwest, Slubb^ Hay Northeast, and Bavside Hast Part A - Sanitary Sewer 1 g" PVC, SDR J5, 0*-8 ’ deep io place 2 8" PVC, SDR 35. 8*-10 ’ deep in place 3 8 PVC, SDR 35, 10’-12’ deep in place 4 8* PVC, SDR 35, 12’-I4 ’ deep in place 5 8" PVC, SDR 35, 14 ’-I6* deep in place 6 8" PVC, SDR 26. 8’-10’ deep in place 7 8" PVC, SDR 26, I0’-12’ deep in place 8 8- PVC SDR 26. 1 2’-14 ’ deep in place 9 8 PVC, SDR 26, 14 ’-I6* deep in place 10 8" PVC, SDR 26, 16 ’-I8’ deep in place 1 1 8" PVC. SDR 26. 18’-20’ deep in place 12 8 PVC, SDR 26, 20’-22’ deep in place 13 8" DIP, 8’-10’ deep in place 14 8" DIP, I0’-I2’ deep in place 15 8" DIP, 12’-I4 ’ deep in place 16 10* PVC, SDR 35, 0’-8* deep in place 17 10- PVC. SDR 35. 8’-10’ deep in place 18 10* PVC, SDR 35, 10’-12’ deep in place 19 10" PVC. SDR 35. 12’-14 ’ deep in place 20 10* PVC, SDR 35. I4 ’-I6 ’ deep in place 21 10* PV JDR 26. 12’-14 ’deep in place 22 10" PVC, SDR 26, I4*-I6 ’ deep in place 23 10* PVC, SDR 26. 16 ’-I8’ deep in place 24 10* PVC, SDR 26, l8’-20’ deep in place 25 10* DIP, 14 ’-I6 ’ deep in place 26 Sid. Mil 8’ dp.. 4 ’ dia., w/R1642 ’l csfg. 27 Mil depth greater than 8’ deep 28 8" DIP, outside drop 29 6" PVC, SDR 21, lorcc main 30 Jack or auger 6" PVC, SDR 21 force main 31 4* PVC. SDR 21. force main 32 Air release maiiliole 33 Rock stabili/ation 139J7.RI-P IJF LF LF U' U- U- LF IJ- U- RP-1 615 1.775 1.175 225 230 55 115 355 300 14.00 14.00 15.00 16.00 17.50 15.00 16.00 17.00 18.50 100 50 250 135 230 1.400.00 700.00 3.750.00 2.160.00 4,025.00 u*310 20.00 LF 315 23.00 LF 115 27.00 U-i20 2100 60 U20.00 LF 30 13.00 40 920.00 LF 35 24.00 U-425 15..50 U*1.30 15.50 U-105 16..50 U-340 18.00 U'135 19..50 LF 245 19.00 U-440 20.50 .370 7485.00 LF 405 23.00 40 920.00 U-40 27.00 U-30 31..50 VJK 36 U50.00 9 11150.00 IJ-140 90.00 38.3 3.447,00 U-25 250.00 16.3 4,075,00 LF 900 11.00 u-60 130.00 IJ-2.800 10.00 60 600.00 IZA 1 2,000.00 iN 500 11.10 86.13 956.04 \ Ilea 34 Connect 6" PVC into existing manhole 35 8^14" PVC service wye branch 36 4" PVC service pipe in place 37 4* PVC service riser pipe in place 38 Improved pipe fdn. in 6" increment Jeptb 39 Mechanical trench compaction 40 E)eiour per detail 41 Insulation 42 Sanitary sewer television inspection 43 Access manliole (Addendum 2) Total Part A • Sanitary Sewer Part B • Restoration 44 Bituminous surfacing removal 45 Common excavation 46 CL 5 aggregate base (100% crushed) 47 CL 2, aggregate shouldering 48 Type 31 bituminous base course 49 Type 41 bituminous binder course 50 Type 41 bituminous wearing course 51 AC-1 bituminous material for mix 52 Ditummous material for tack coat 53 Bituminous material for seal coat 54 FA-3 seal coat aggregate (Cl. A) in pi. 55 Bituminous material for patching 56 12" RCP. Class 3 in place 57 18- RCP, Class 3 in place 58 24" RCP, Class 3 in place 59 36" RCP, Class 3 in place 60 12" RCP flared end in place 61 18" RCP flared end in place 62 24" RCP flared end w/tr:isb guard in pi. 63 36" RCP flared end w/tr;ish guard in pi. 64 Mechanical trench compaction 65 Impr. pipe fdn. in 6" increment depth 66 Remove existing CMP eulvert (^Uact Unit Quantity Amount UnH Ouamiiy Pnoe To Dale I'o Dale Ej\1 400.00 l£A 85 60.00 13 780.00 U*2.100 11.50 300 3.450.00 U'100 11.50 20 230.00 U-24.000 1.40 liOO 1100.00 u-14.875 1.00 1.200 1.200.00 LS 1 6.000.00 1 6.000.00 SY 300 20.00 U-8.075 0.60 1 1.500.00 $57,768.04 SY 11.000 1.75 10.000 17300.00 CY 6,000 3.70 TN 7.800 8.50 TN 400 12.50 TN 1.400 14.50 TN 450 15.00 TN l.OOO 16.00 TN 167 120.00 GL 1.200 IJO GL 1.400 3.00 TN 70 50.00 SY 1.000 2100 U'150 17..50 U-75 20.50 LF 50 25.90 U'40 48.45 1L^\10 365.00 E/\4 410.00 liA 1.005.00 FA 2 l.ooO.OO U-315 1.00 U-300 2.00 LF 315 3.00 100 300.00 1 13937 RI P KI*-2 lien? 67 Filler blauket in place 68 Riprap, CL III in place 69 Tree removal 70 Sod witli 4" topsoil 71 Seed w/topsoil, mulch & fertilizer 72 Erosiuo control fence 73 Wood fiber blanket 74 Furnish and plant Evergreen tree (Blue Spruce) 6* high 75 Furnish and plant shade tree (Sugar Maple) 4* diameter 76 Remove Sl rcpl. wood or chain link fence 77 Remove & transplant bushes 78 Remove & transplant tree - Desiduous 79 Remove Sc, transplant tree - Coniferous 80 Geolextile fabric (Adikndum 2) Total Part B • ’’cstoralion Part C - 1 aft Station #1 . Wes: Lake St. 81 Lift Station No. 1 Total Part C - Lift Sta. #1 - W Lake St. Part D • IJft Station #2 « Tonka Avenue 82 Lift Station No. 2 Total Part D - Lift Sta. # 2 • Tonka Av Tv ’ * Part A • Sanitary Sewer Total Part B - Restoration ToUl Part C - LS. #1 - West Lake St. 7'oial Part D - LS. #2 • Tonka Avenue TOTAL BASE BID alitrna n; no. t - bederwood Part A - Sanitary Sewer 83 8- PVC, SDR 35. 0 -8* deep in place 84 8- PVC. SDR 35. 8’. 10* deep in place 13937 HI P Unit Cuo tract Uuantiiy Uail Price SY 200 2.50 SY 200 45.00 175 125.00 SY 14.000 2.00 AC 4 800.00 LF 4.500 2.00 SY 12i00 1.10 l^A 6 350.00 EA 6 350.00 U-MX)10.00 EA 12 50.00 llA 12 i 00.00 EA 12 100.00 SY 15.000 1.50 LS I 60.400.00 I.S 1 50.350.00 U- IJ* UP-3 615 405 Ouaolity Tu Dale Amoy at lu Dale 13.00 13.00 4.150.00 $22,050.00 $0.00 S0.00 57.768.04 21050.00 0.00 nno S79.816.04 iLcm 85 8" PVC. SDR 35. W-IT deep in place 86 8- PVC. SDR J5. ir-14’ deep in place 87 8" PVC, SDR 35, 14’-16* deep tn place 88 8- PVC, SDR 26. 0*-8* deep lu place 89 8" PVC, SDR 26, 8 ’-10* deep in place 90 8* PVC. SDR 26, 10*. 12* deep in place 91 8- PVC, SDR 26. 12*-14* deep in place 92 8* PVC, SDR 26. 14*-16* d^^ep in place 93 8* PVC, SDR 26, 16*-18* deep in place 94 8- PVC. SDR 26, 18*-20* deep in place 95 8- PVC. SDR 26. 20*.22* deep in place 96 8- DIP. 8*10* deep in place 9^^ 8" DIP, 10*-12* deep in place 98 SuL Mil 8* dp.. 4* dia.. w/R1642B csfg. 99 Manhole depth greater than 8* deep 100 4" PVC. SDR 21. force main 101 8" X 4" PVC service wyc branch 102 4" PVC service pipe in place 103 4" PVC service riser pipe in place 104 Mechanical trench compciCtion 105 Improved pipe fdn. in 6” increment depth 106 Rock stabilization 107 Sanitary sewer television inspection Total Part A * Sanitary Sewer Part B . Restoration 108 Bituminous removal 109 Couimon excavation 11^ Class 5 aggregate base (100% cru:>hed) 111 Type al bituminous b;ise course 112 Ty|>e 41 bituminous binder course 113 Type 41 bituminous wearing course 114 AC*I bituminous material for mix 115 Bitum nous material for tack 116 Tice removal 117 Bituminous material for patching Unit CuaIXMU Ouauily Uoil Price IJF 170 14.C0 IJr 25 15.50 L'^20 17.00 LF 25 14.00 IJ^50 i4.00 LF 30 14.00 l-F 25 15.00 LF 165 16.50 LF 215 18.00 LI'30 2100 U-51/26.00 LF 20 20.00 U-20 20.00 LA 10 U50.00 U*28 90.00 LF'70 15.00 LA • 3 60.00 IJ-460 15.00 U-40 15.00 U-'1415 1.00 LI'4.000 IJO TN 100 ii.ee IJ'1.888 0 65 SY 1.100 2.00 CY 500 5.70 TN 700 9.00 IN 200 19.00 TN 10 23.00 IN 150 20.00 TN I‘>120.00 (IL 2.50 1.50 lv\5C 115.00 500 r.loo Ouanlily To Dale Amounl 1*0 Date $0.00 13937 Ul RIM L o. Item Unit CiNilnct Ouiuiuiy Unil Price 118 Sod with 4” topsoil SY 3.500 2.00 119 Seed w/tupsoil. mulch &, fertilizer AC 1.0 SOO.OO 120 Geotextile fabnc (Addendum 2)SY 1.100 1.50 Total ['art B • Re:»loratioQ Part C - Lift Station #3 121 lift Station No. 3 Total Part C - Lift Sla. #3 Total Part A - Sanitary Sewer 1 otal Part B • Restoration Total Part C - Lift Sta. 3 - Beikrwood TOTAL ALTERNATE NO. I - BEDIiRWOOD ALTI:RNATC N^^ 2 - BAYSIDR NORTH Part A * Sanitary .Sewer 13937 lU P k!^: QuADiily lo Date /Vimiuiil To Dale so.oo 40.450.00 $0.00 0.00 0.00 000 so.oo 122 8" I’VC. SDR .35.0'-8* deep in place LF 140 13.00 123 8" PVC. SDR 35. 8’-10’ deep in place LF 225 13.00 124 8" PVC. SDR 35. 10’-12’ deep in place LI-85 14.00 125 8* PVC. SDR 35. 12’-14’ deep in place LI-225 15.50 126 Sid. Mil 8’ dp.. 4’ dia.. W/R1642B nig.EA 3 U50.00 127 Manhole depib grealer than 8’ deep LF 6 90.00 128 8” DIP, outside drop U'(1.5 250.00 129 8" X 4" PVC service wye branch EA 6 60.00 130 4" PVC service pipe in place U-105 15.00 131 4" PVC service riser pipe in place LF 10 15.00 132 Improved pipe fdn. in 6" increment depth U-500 2.00 133 Mecbaiiicai trench compaction U-810 1.00 134 Sanitary sewer televisiou inspection (Addendum 2)U-675 0.65 Total Part A - Sanitarv Sewer P <rt B • Restoration 135 *1 ree rcuiovai E/\50 125.00 136 Sod with 4” topsoil SY 2.000 2.00 $0.00 Item 137 Seed with topsoi'. mulch &. fcr(ili/er Total Part B - Restoration Total Part A • Sanitary Sewer Total Part B • Rcsloralion TOTAL ALTERNATE NO. 2 - BAYSIDE NORl 11 ALTERNATE NO. 3 • CYGNET PlJ\Cl: Part A - Sanitary Sewer 138 S" PVC, SDR 35. 0’-8’ deep in place 139 8" PVC. SDR 35. 8'-10* deep in place 140 8" PVC. SDR 35. 10’-12’ deep in place 141 8* PVC. SDR 35. 12’-14 ’ Jeep in place 142 8" PVC. SDR .15. 14 ’*16 ’ deep in place 143 8" PVC. SDR 26. 0’-8’ deep in place 144 8" PVC. SDR 26. 8’-10’ deep in place 145 8' PVC. SDR 26. 10*. 1 2’ deep in place 146 8‘ PVC. SDR 26. 12’-14 ’ deep in place 147 8" PVC. SDR 26. 14 ’-16 ’ deep in place 148 8- PVC. SDR 26. 16 ’-18 ’ deep in place 149 8- PVC. SDR 26. I8’-20’ deep in place 150 8* PVC. SDR 26. 20’-22’ deep in place 151 8- PVC. SDR 26. 22’-24’ deep in place 152 8* PVC. SDI-. 26. 24’-26’ deep in place 153 8" PVC. 3DR 26. 26’-28’ deep in place 154 8- PVC. SDR 26. 28’-30’ deep in place 155 Std. MH 8’ .Ip.. 4* ia.. w/R1642B cstg. 156 Manhole depiH i.'jan 8’ deep 157 8” DIP. outside drop 158 8" X 4" PVC service wye branch 159 4" PVC service ptpc in place 160 4" PVC service ris..r pipe in place 161 Improved pipe Idu 6' iucrenicnt depth 162 Mechanical trench coiiipactiou 161 Sanitary sewer television ins|K*ction Total Part A - Sanitary Sewer 13917.RI-I* Unit AC KP-6 txmtnct Ouanlily 0.5 Unit Price Uuaotity To Date Amount I'o Date 800.00 SO.OO 0.00 Aoa so ' u-400 i2.00 LF 225 1100 L:335 13.00 U'235 14.00 50 15.50 LI'25 13.00 i.r 65 13.00 LI-75 14.00 LF 280 15.00 U-735 16.50 IJ-885 18.00 LF 440 20.00 U-120 23.00 U-135 26.00 LF 145 29.00 U-175 32.00 U'170 38 00 E.\18 U50.00 U-138 90.00 LF 5.2 250.00 EA 34 60.00 LI-1,0.50 1100 .’J-150 1100 LI-'72500 1.75 IJ-'5.545 1.00 U-4.495 0.65 4 50.00 Item Ufiil Part B - Restoration 164 Remove existing bituminous 165 Conmion excavation 166 Class 5 aggregate base (100% crushed) 167 Type 31 bituminous base course 168 Type 41 bituminous wearing course 169 AC-1 bituminous material for mix 170 Bituminous material for tack coat 171 Bituminous material for patching 172 12" RCP, Class 5 in place 173 15" RCP, Class 4 in place 174 18-RCP, Class 4 in place 175 33" RCP, Class 3 in place 176 48- RCP, Class 3 in place 177 12" RCP flared end iu place 178 15" RCP Bared cud in place 179 18" RCP flared end in place 180 33" RCP flared end w/trasb guard in pi. 181 48" RCP flared cud w/trasb guard in pL 182 Mechanical trench compaction 183 Impr. pipe fdn. in 6" iucremeui depth 184 Remove existing CMP culvert 185 Filter blanket in place 186 Riprap in place 187 Tree removal 188 Sod with 4" topsoU 189 Seed with topsoil, mulch & fertilizer 190 Gcolcxtile fabric (Addendum 2) Total Part B - Restoration Total Part A - Sanitary Sewer Total Part B - Restoration TO l AL ALTERNA'Ili NO. 3 - CYGNFT PI ACH 139J7.IU T KP-7 CxMtiact Quantity Uoil Frioe Quantity To Date AroouQt *lb Date SY 10,800 1.80 CY 4,500 4.40 TN 6,000 840 TN IJ>00 14.53 TN UOO 15.50 IN 160 120.00 C.L 750 1.50 SY 300 22.00 LF 300 17.50 LF 30 19.00 U'75 21.00 LF 100 33.00 U'80 81.00 FA 12 365.00 llA 390.00 FA 4 410.00 FA 2400.00 F:A 2 2.665.00 LF 495 1.00 LF 400 2.00 U'495 3.00 SY 25 240 CY 50 50.00 FA IS 125.00 SY 7400 2.00 AC 2.0 800.00 SY 5400 1.50 9J500 17,100.00 SI7.100 00 0.00 izmnjiQ_ S17.100.00 Item ALTERNATE NO. 5 - OXFORD ROAD Part A - Sanitary Sewer 191 8- PVC SDR 35, 10’-12* deep in place 192 8" PVC, SDR 35, 12'.14’ deep in place 193 8" PVC. SCR 35. 14’-I6’ deep in place 194 8" PVC. SDR 35, 16’-18* deep in place 195 Std. MH 8* dp.. 4* dia.. W/RI642B csig. 196 MH depth greater than 8* deep 197 8"x4" PVC service wye branch 198 4" PVC service pipe in place 199 4" PVC service riser pipe in place 200 Improved pipe fdm in 6" increment depth 201 Mechanical trench compaction 202 Sanitary sewer television inspection Total Part A • Sanitary Sewer Part B - Restoration Total Part B • Restoration Unit Gdolract Qiuntity Total Part A • Sanitary Sewer Total Part B • Restoration TOTAL ALTERNATE NO. 5 . OXFORD ROAD l39J7.urP KPS Unit ^ioc Ouamity To Dale Arauual To Date u-675 13.00 LF 400 14.50 U*'150 17.00 LF 200 20.00 IZA 5 1.350.00 LF 28 90.00 li/\12 60.00 LF 500 1100 LF 40 1100 LF 2.000 100 U'1.925 1.00 LF 1.415 0.65 $00 203 Bituminous surfacing removal SY 4.100 2.00 204 Common excavation CY 1.600 4.60 205 CL 5 aggregate base (100% crushed)IN 2J00 8.50 206 Type 31 bituminous base course TN 400 16.00 207 Type 41 bituminous wearing course TN 300 18.00 208 AC-1 bituminous material for mix TN 42 120.00 209 Bituminous material for tack coat GL 235 1.50 210 Bituminous material for patching SY 150 2100 211 Tree removal LA 3 125.00 212 Sod with 4” topsoil SY 4.000 100 213 Seed w/topsoil. mulch Sc fertilizer AC 0.5 800.00 214 Erosion control fence u:200 100 215 Geotextile fabric (Addendum 2)SY 2,500 1.50 S0.0U 0.0U iiuu. $0.00 IlCOi Uoit Cbolraci Quafitity Uail rrkc Quanlily To Dalfi Amouol To Dale Total Base Bid Total Alternate No. 1 - Bederwood Total Alternate No. 2 - Bayside North Total Alternate No. 3 • Cygnet Place Total Alternate No. 5 - Oxford Road 1‘OTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE 79.818.04 0.00 0.00 17.100.00 oon $96,918.04 f I3937.RFP RP-9 PROJnCT PAYMKNTr STAIUS Owner City of Orono Project Stubbs Bay Sanitary Sewer Project No. File No. 13937 Contractor Progressive Cootraeturs, Inc. CHANGE ORDERS No. Date 1 Amount Total Change Orders - Add PAYMEbTF SUMMARY No. I Period Start 8-7-92 Payment $116,255.77 Retaioage $6,118.73 Completed $96,918.04 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total Payment to Date Retainage, Payment No. Total Amount Uarned $116,255.77 6,118.73 $ 122,3742)0 Original Contract Change Orders Revised Contract 1,480,331.95 0.00 1,480,331.95 13937.RTP RP-10 i! TO:Ron Moorse, City Administrator A/^'7 COUNCt MEEIWG AUC 2 4 mt cinropoRONo FROM:John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director DATE:August 19, 1992 SUBJECT: Bid Award Fuel Distribution System New Facility In July the bid award for the fuel system for the new facility was presented as an underground system using two 10,000 gallon double wall steel tanks for storage of fuel. Due to environmental concerns, staff was directed to research the difference in price of fiber glass tanks versus steel tanks. The complete system using fiber glass tanks (double wall) $72,209.00 The complete system using steel tanks (double wall) 67,867.00 $ 4,342.00 The above bid is from Pump & Meter Company and I recommend awarding the bid to Pump and Meter Company for the above amount. rfVnriiTri n I nii m istai TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator August 19, 1992 COUNCIL MEETING AUG 2 4 «92 CITY OF ORONO SUBJECT: City Hall and Public Works Buildings Application and Certificate of Payment No. 6 Attachment; Application and Certificate of Payment No. 6 Kraus-Anderson Construction Co. $21,340.15 Steenberg-Watrud Const. Co. $83,799.00 Gephart Electric $22,529.30 Kremer and Davis $ 1,341.00 Gresser Concrete/Masonry $19,799.10 ■Wi Y 1 4 ^ ^ ^ ,.*^1 k kk%jk X yji ^ C0.4 an tLm » f Steininger Construction $40,434.20 We have received from Project Construction manager John Davies approved application for payment of work at the city hall and public works locations as follows: - Kraus-Anderson Construction Co. - For construction management services for July, $7,443.00 for site supervision and reimburseable expenses for July $13,897.15. S teenbe rg-Wa t r ud Construction Co. •• For concrete foundation and block at city hall/police building, $83,799.00. Gephart Electric Company, Inc. - For electrical work at public works, $22,529.30. Kremer and Davis - For waterproofing public works building, $1,341.00. Gresser Concrete/Masonry - For concrete floor work at public works, $19,799.10. Allied Mechanical Systems - For public works location plumbing, $24,245.00. - Steininger Construction - For easrthwork and site preparation, $40,434.20. The attachments i.re presented for your approval. Requested Action: Council approval of Architect's Application and Certificate for Payment No. 6 as presented. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , to approve City Hall and Public Works Bui iTi ngs Archi tec t"^ Application and Certificate for Payment No. 6 as presented. Motion, _ ayes, _ nays. e. -k.-n, If- , n. %APPLICATION AND CERTIRCATE FOR PAYMENT Pnqo 1 of 1 PagesTO (OWNER): City ol Orono1335 Brown Road South Crystal Bay, MN 55323 t^nOJECT: Orono City Hall/Policoand Public Works Building CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: Kraus-ArxJorson Construction 525 f nuth Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55404 ARCHITECT: Boarman Kroos Pfister 222 North Second Street Minneapolis, MN 55401 APPLICATION NO; SixPERIOD FROM: July 1.1992 PERIOD TO: July 31,1992 ARCHirECT’S PROJECT NO: 1124.04 CONTRACT DATE: November 12, 1991 SECTION CONTRACTOR/SUPPUE R CURRENT PAYMENT DUE 100 Kraus-Anderson $13,897.15 02200 Steininqer Construction $40,434.20 04220 Grosser Concrete/Masonry $19,799.10 04220 Steenberg-Watrud $83,799.00 07120 Kremer and Davis $1,341.00 15000 Allied Mechanical $24,245.00 16000 Gephart E'ectric $22,529.30 CM Fee Kraus-Anderson __$7,443.00 i . TOTAL:$213,487.75 ARCHITECrS CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on-site observations and the data comprising the above situation, the Architect certifies to the Owner that to the best of the Architect’s knowledge, information and belief the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents, and the Contractors are entitled to payment of the AMOUNT INDICATED. ARCHfTECT:/jL«4^^^^^^ V • By:_________________________Dale: ORONO CfTY HAa AND PU0UC VVORKS BUIU)I^ ORDHO.m PAGE 1 OF 4 APPUCATION NUMOER 6CONinACTOn S PROJECT NO.: 4059 ITEM NO. DESCrtPTION OF WORK SCHECDLBD VALUE WORK COMPLETED STORED MATERIALS TOTAL ODMPIETH) STORED TO DATE %BALANCE TO FNSH RETAMAGEPREVOUS APPLICATIONS THIS APPLICATTON 100 Kraus-Anderson Construction $86,000.00 $32,013.37 $7,589 40 $40,502.77 46%$47,497 23 • Tamporary Oftica $2,')50 00 $0 00 0%$2,950 00 • Temporary Phone $1,500.0C $1,230.77 $105.56 $1,336 33 69%$163 67 - Temporary Toilet $1,500 00 $314.12 $110 52 $424 64 26%$1,075 36 • Equipment Rental $10,000 00 $3,305.24 $1,024 46 $4,329.70 43%$5,670 30 - Oas and 04 (Operation of Equipment)$1,000.00 $000 0%$1,000 00 - Travel arxl Expanses $500 00 $126.39 $126.39 25%$373 61 - Trucking $4,000.00 $623 74 $623.74 16%$3,376 26 • Rehiee Oumpsiers $9.600 00 $860 00 $860 00 9%$8,740.00 - Lioansad Surveying (Coffin A Gronberq)$8,500.00 $1,791.00 $1,791.00 21%$6,709.00 • Misc. Barriers ar)d Guard Rails $2,000.00 $0 00 0%$2,000 00 - Continuous Clean up $9,855.00 $0 00 0%$9,855 00 - Final Cleaning $11,000.00 $0 00 0%$11,000 00 • Temporary Construction Fences and Gatos $1,650 00 $1,360 00 $708 27 $2,068.27 125%($418.27) • Tamporary Electric $1,650 00 $782 89 $4,358 94 $5,141.83312%($3,491.83) - Tarnporary ErKlosures $2,000,00 $0.00 0%$2,000.00 • Tamporary Fire Protection $500 00 $0.00 0%$500.00 • Prelect Sign $450.00 $0.00 0%$450.00 - Tastfng(Conc..Earthwork arxl Special Insp.)$8,000.00 $20,630.95 $20,630.95 256%($12,630.95) - Srxrw Removal $750.00 $0 00 0%$750.00 - Contingency $1,600 00 $0.00 0%$1,600.00 • Bulkflng Permit $16,938 00 $758.93 $758 93 4%$16,179.07 2200 Steininger $254 000 00 $205,800.00 $12,700 00 $218,500 00 66%$35,500.00 $21,650.00 rAtMQES3.S30.40 ■A.so.oo$0.00S7.1S7.B0 SI.410.60 SI 0.024.90 S559.60 S12.311.00 SO.OO SO.OO SO.OU $168.50 S149.00 r OnONO CITY HALL AND PUBLIC WORKS BUILDWGS ORONO.MN PAGE: 3 OF 4 APPUCATION NUMBER 6CONTRACTOR S PROJECT NO.: 4059flBANO.WORK COMPLETED TOTAL %BALANCE TO FmSH RETAR4AGEDESCFVmONOFWOfKSCHEIMJH)VALUE PREVOUSAPPUCATX3NS THSAPPUCATION STOREDMATERIALS COMPUETH) STORED TO DATE7240MulcahyS47.500.00 $0.00 0%$47,500.00 $0.007610/ohnoutka Roofing $156,288.00 $0.00 0%$156,288.00 $0.007900Jansco CaulKing $3,950.00 $0.00 0%$3,950.00 $0.006110LaFofce Hardiaare $35,465.00 $0.00 0%$35,465 00 $0.000360Twin City Garage Door $21,945.00 $0.00 0%$21,945.00 so.oo 8410 Hoffer's Glass $78,745.00 $0.00 0%$78,745.00 $0.00 9260 Mulcahy $117,500.00 $0 00 0%$117,500.00 so.oo 9500 Twin City Acoustics $16,310.00 $0.00 0%$16,310.00 $0.00 9660 Si Paul Lifx>leum $38,553.00 $0 00 0%$38,553.00 $0.00 9900 Swanson and Youngdafo $24,094.00 $0.00 0%$24,894.00 $0.00 10400 LaRoySign $2,538 00 $0 00 0%$2,538.00 $0.00 10500 Modem Bln $7,841.00 $0.00 0%$7,841 00 $0.00 ORONCORONCrTB4NO1312<1312<1500'1550> 1600 ^0 PUBLIC WORKS BUIL0f4GS I# 1-:4 Ffl KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY C 1. )NTK \U i* >K> .X H .iNSI KLCiK )N \1 W ^-nv niee.. #P2R54^ July 30 . 1992 City of Orono P.O. Box 66, 1335 Brown Road S. Crystal Bay, MN 55423 Attn: Mr. Tom Kuehn Finance Director Re: Orono City Hall K/A Project #4059 Renuest For Paymen t This request for payment is for on-site supervision and reimbursable expenses through July 18, 1992, as per construction manager contract dated November 12, 1991. Project Superintendent Doug Revard 160 his. (3) $37.53/hr.$6,004.80 Safety Tom Nelson 8 hrs. @ $45.0U/i»r 360.00 Mps^erpei Service La7 Rodriquez 11 hrs. <2) $18.00/lir 198.00 Laborer Ralph Jendro Ralph Jendro III 11 hrs. @ $34.77/hr. 10 hrs. @ $32.58/hr, 382.47 325.80 Reimbursable Expenses Copying Postage Biffs K/A Equipment Rental Correct truck rental rale Electric Service Krcmer & Davis MCI NSP U.S. West 542.40 64.20 110.52 1,169.46 (145.00) 4,306.04 420.00 1.37 52.90 104.10 Amount Due Tliis Invoice $13,897,1.5 MinniMpolis Division i23 Siiuth aih SlretM. MinruMpoliN, 3 5404 (hi 2) 312-72B1 F*\\ (hl2) 332-8739 EcjUtil Of)f)orlunit\ Fmplover m KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ( I » V ' \ r\i. 'v ’ V ‘\ \ . W . . Invoice #P2S546 July 30, 1992 City of Orono P.O. Box 66, 1335 Brown Road S. Crystal Bay, MN 55423 Attn: Mr. Tom Kuehn Finance Director Re: Orono City Hall K/A Project #4059 Reniiest For Paymen t This request for payment is for construction management services of Orono City Hall, as per the contract for the niomh of July 1992. Amount Due: $7,443.00 Minneapolis Division 525 S(nilli «ll> Slrrei, MmtKM(M)ljs. \tN 55404 Phono ihl ’) M2-7281 FAX: (bl 2) 332-8739 F((u.il Op(Joftunilv Emplover i APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT aia document C702 (instructions on rowr*.** sku*) rvaoNiof 4 PAi.tsTO (OWNER):City of Orono1335 Brown Road SouthCrystal Bay, MN 55323 FROM (CONTRACTOR):Steininger Construction Co, Inc.I’KOIK I:Orono City llall/Police and Public V/orks Buildings AITltCAIION NO: 5I’TRIOD 10:7-25-92VIA (ARCMITICT):TTarman Kroos Pfister & Assoc.ARCHITECT’S PROIECT NO; 1124.04 Distnhution to:I 1 OWNER ri ARCHITECT U CONTRACTOR □□ 222 North Second Street CONTRACT FOR: Earthwork & Site Ut ilities Minneapolis, MN 55401 CONTRACT DATE: November 2 2, 1992 CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Application is made for Payment, as shown h<*low, in connection with the Contratt. Continuation Sheet, AIA Document G703, is attadnul. CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY Change Orders approvt*d in previous months by Owner TOTAL ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS Approved this Month • Klurhb^r ■Dale Approved > 1 • 1 ■ . 1 r 1 _______■**'** ''vTirr...--V uMAi'i n Ki ebarige by Cbarige Orders 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM........................................... S OQ.Q «-0P- 2. Ncl change by Change Orriers . ............................... S —Z2x6.23_j^00_ 3. CONTRACT SUM TO D-»TI (Lino 1- 2)..........................S .333,623^QP 4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATf.....................t .289,108,30 (Column G on G70J) 5. RETAINACE: a J-Q % of Completed Work $ ,28#^310.80 __ (Column I) 4 t on G70I) b.___% of Stored Material $___________________ (Column r on C701) Total Retaina^»e (Line Sa 4 5b or Total in Column I of G703)t 28.910,80 the undersif^ned Contractor certifies that to thr* best of the Contrar lor s knnwledp^e, information and belief the Wiuk covered by this Afiplicalion for Pa\im‘nl has bc»en lompicdf'd in accordance* with the Contract Documents, t!.«»l all amounts liave been paid by the Contractor fc4r Work for which previous Certificates (or Payment were issued and payments received from the Owner, and lb*d current payim*nt shown herein is now due. (k total EARNED LESS RETAINACE...................................$ .260, 197,_20 (Line 4 less Line 5 Total) 7. IISS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT (Line f» from prior Certificated ................$ j 193«00 _ 8. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE.................................................$ 40 a434_j20J;1 '). BALANCE TO FINISH, PIUS RETAINACE........................S . ?3,425,^80 -------------------------^ (Line 3 loss line 6) ?,• ,X‘ ?• CONTRACTOR: Dale State Subscribed and svyofn to beforc nio th Nol.uy Public My Commission expfres: --------------------------------------------------'—- - <> / ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In accordanc e with the Contract Doc uments, tiasinl on on-sile ol>servati(ins and the data comprising the above application, the Architec 11 erlifir*. to the Owner that to the best of the Archilecrs knowledge, information and belief Ihe Work has progressed as indicated, the quality of the Work is in accordance with the* ( onfract Dm umc'nts, and the Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNI c l kill II D. AMOUNT CERTIFIED (Att.nh rxpbrhitmn if amount certified differs from the amount applied for.) AKC MlltCl: By:Dale: This Certificate is not negotiable. The AMOUNT ClkTIIIID is payable only to the Contrac lor named herein. Issuance, payment and ac c epiance of paymeni are without prejudice to any rights of Ihe Owner or Contractor uruler this Ccjntract. AlA DOCUMENf C702 • AITl 1C ANON AND Cl Kill K All M)K IVMMlNI • \i\Y 1 ‘iaUDITION • AIA* • t 1903 Mil AMIKK AN INSIIIUII OI AK( MIIM IS. 171% NIW \OKk WINIU. N W. WASI IIN(.!()N. O C* warming vlnlAf^s U 5 cof»v»lnht »r*a N Uq^l C702-1983 CONTINUATION SHEET AIA DOCUMENT G703 (Instruttions on rcvorsc sidr) i'm.i 2 oi 4 mc.isAIA Document C702, APPLICATION AND CtRTII ICATE FOK PAYMENI, containing Contractor's signed Ccrtilication is attached. In tabulations below, amounts arc stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage (or line items may apply. APPLICAl ION NUMBER APPLICATION DATE PERIOD U) ARCHIIICT'S PROILCr NO 7-25-92 7-25-92 A D c D E F c FI 1 ITEM NO. DESCRiniON OY WORK SCHEDUllU WORK COMmUD MAH RIALS PRLSrNTlY STORID (NOT IN D OR e: UHAL coMPinn) AND STORID TO DATE (D f E t f) X G-O HALANCt TO FINISH (C-Q Rl lAlNAGt 10% VAIUE IROM I'KIVIOUS AITlKAtKJN (D * t) mis PfRIOD PerfoniBnce Bond 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00100 -0-500.00 Tree Removal 10,000.00 9,000.00 1,000.00 10,000.00100 1,000.00 Strip Site 20,000.00 16,000.00 4,000.00 20,000.00100 -0-2,000.00 Grade & Spread Topsoil 15,000.00 3,000.00 4,000.00 7,000.00 47 8,000.00 700.00 Grade Curbs 2,500.00 -0-2,500.00 Grade Parking Lots 4,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 50 2,000.00 200.00 Class V Base 15,000.00 -0-15,000.00 Footings & Pads 6,500.00 4,800.00 1,700.00 6,500.00 100 650.00 Grade Floor Slab •5,000.00 1,000.00 2,000.00 3,000.00 60 2,000.00 300.00 Import & Place • Compaction Fill 166,000.00 161,000.00 161,000.00 97 5,000.00 16,100.00 Rough Grade Site 5,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 80 1,000.00 400.00 This Sheet 254,000.00 205,800.00 12,700.00 218,500.00 35,500.00 21,850.00 AIA DOCUMENT cm •AmiCAI ION AND (tmiMCAn fORmVMINI »MAY I'RU IDIIION • AIA»* O l<»n THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OT ARCHITECTS. 17IS NEW YORK AVINUI. N W . WAMIINOION, D C. WHY.C703'I983 ■ - CONTINUATION SHEET AIA DOCUMENT 0703 dnstruclions on rt'versi* skip) iw(.i 3 of ^rAC'.is AIA Document C702, APPLICAIION AND CCRTIflCATE FOU PAYMENT, cont.iininj; Contractor's signed Certification is attached. In tabulations below, amounts arc stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where variable retamage for line items may apply. APPIICATION NUMBER: 5 API’LICAIION DAIE: 7-25-92 PERIOD lO: 7 ‘2 ARCMlTECrS PROiECT NO: A B c:0 E F C H 1 ITEM DESCRIPTION OF WORK soimuiii)WORK COMRlEUn MATERIALS TOIAE %BALANCE RIIAINAGE NO.VA1.UL FROM PREVIOUS APPIICAIION (1) ♦ n THIS PERIOD PRESENTLY STORED (NOT IN D OR E) COMPl ETED AND STORED TO EMTE (D-FE4-F) C-C)TO FINISH (C-G)10% 1 Base Bid: Including sand, pumpwater, rip rap, GeoTex Tile i;^er rip rap and mark up. 34,800.00 31,980.00 2,900.00 34,880.00 100 -0-3,488.00 2 Performace Bond 766.00 950.00 -(184.00)766.00 100 -0-76.60 3 Drop Manhole $1,500.00 plus ten perc:ent (10%) overhead & profit. 1,650.00 1,650.00 1,650.00 100 -0- m 165.00 4 Rock Bedding 135 tons ^ $12.00 plus ten percent (10%) overhead & profit 1,702.00 1,782.00 • A. 1,782.C3 100 -0-178.20 39,078.00 36,362.00 2,716.00 39,078.00 3,907.80 AIA DOCUMENT C7IO * M^ICATtON rTRTiriCATf roK PAYMINl - MAY l'l«1 M^IIION • AIA» • e ISfll IMt AMIRICAN INMITUTI OF AROnTrCTS, amnui . N.VV. WAMMNr.lfiN, Of C70T-inB1 CONTINUATION SHEET AIA DOCUMLNT C70J (instructions on reverse side) r\i;t or ^ rsc;isAIA Document C702. Ai'PlICAIION AND ClKIlHCAIt lOK I’AYMlNl, conl.uninj; Contractor's signed Certilieation is attached.In labulalions below, amounts arc slated to (be nearest dollar.Use Column I on Contracts where variable relainage lor line ilcnns may apply.ArniCATION NUMRrR; 5AfiniCAllON DAU: 7-25-92 I’lRIOD lO: 7-25-92 AKCHIIlCrS I’ROIICI NO: ITEM NO. 8 DESCRIPTION OE WORK SCHEDULED VALUE Revise grades Install Geofabric Silt Fence Grandular for sidewalks Footing Excavation Scind cushicxi eind vapor barrier Excavate for colvert Deduct Itiis Sheet 6.179.00 8.036.00 2,250.00 7,200.00 9,100.00 7,500.00 380.00 (150.00) L WORK COMPIETED I ROM PKIVIOUS APPIIC AIION (D « E) 0 0- •0 ■0 ■0 0 0 -0- 40,545.00 IHIS ITRIOO 5.000. 00 7.200.00 1.500.00 6.000. 00 9.100.00 2,500.00 380.00 (150.00) r MATERIALS PRESfNUV SKTRtD (N01 IN D OR E) lOtAl COMITETED AND SIORID TO DAI I (D 4 I r E) 5,000.00 31,530.00 7,200.00 1,500.00 5,000.00 9,100.00 2,500.00 330.00 (150.00) 31,530.00 % G-C) 89 100 RALANCE TO EINISH (C - C.t I RETAINACE 10% 1,179.00 500.00 886.00 720.00 750.00 150.00 1,200.00 600.00 100 -0-910.00 5,000.00 250.00 0- -0- 9,015.00 38.00 -(15.00) 3,153.00 AU OOCUMtNT C7t3 • An ’llCAflON AND CIRIIMCAII fOR PA^NUNT • A\AY 19B3 IDIIIUN • AIA* • €) 1981 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTl Of ARCHITECTS. 1735 NEW YORK AVENUI. N.W., WASMINC10N. D C 2(KK)b V- G701-t983 r APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENTlO (OWNER):City of Orono1335 Brown Road SouthCrystal Bay, MM 55323 FROM (CONTRACTOR): PKOItCl:Orono City Hall/Police and Public Works Duildimjs CONTRACT FOR: CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT ‘ chance order summary" VIA lAKCHITECT): Boarman Kroos Pfister and Assoc 222 North Second Street Minneapolis, MN 55401 ARCHITECTS PROIECT NO: 1124.04 Disinbiilion tt»;□ OWNER□ ARCHITECI □ CONIRACTOR□ n CONTRACT IMTE: Change Orders approved in previous months by Owner TOTAL ADDITIONS Approved this Month Number Dale Approved TOTALS Net chaoRe by ChanKc Orders DFDUCnONS Application is made (or Payment, as shown below, m conncclion with the Contract. Continuation Sheet, AIA Document G703, is attached. 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM........................................... $ 181,827.^00._______ 2. Net change by Change Orders........................................$____5,596 .00 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1*2)..........................S 187,423.00 A na r • _______________________________ ______A TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE......................$ 177.423 00 (Column C on 0701) 5 RETAINAGE; a. IXL % o( Completed Work S 17,742. IQ (Column D + E on G70J) h.------% ol Stored Material $ ______________ (Column F on G703) Total Retainage (line 5a f 5b or lotal in Column I o( G703)........................................$ 17,742.30 Ihe undersigned Contractor certilies that to Ihc best ol tin- Contrar loi s knowleilee miorinalion and belie! the Work covereo by this Application lor Payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by Ihe Contractor (or Work (or which previous Ceilduates (or Payment were issued and payments received (rom the Owner, and thai (urreni payment shoyvn herein is now due GEORGE Q. POLUSNY ' 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE...............................S 159,680.7 0 (line 4 less Line 5 Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES TOR CONTRACTOR: By: PAYMENT (line (> (rom prior Cerli(icale)................$ 139.8 81.60 fl. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE...........................................$ 19.7QQ 10 5 BALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINAGE....................$ 27,742.30 _____(line 3 less Line h) notary public • MWNCSOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY My CoflMMlOn EiVBH Oc L IS. 1997 ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In accordance with the Conrad Documents, based on on site ohservations and the data comprising the above application, the Architec t ceitilies to tlie ()wner tliat to the best o( Ihc Architect s knowledge, information and beliel Itie Woik has progressed as indicated, Ihc tiualily o( the Work is in arc ordain e with Ihe Coniiad D.n umenis. and the Contractor is entitled lo payment ol the A,\touNT O Rill It D, Slate ol: Minnesota County o(; Fiennepin Subscribed and syvorn lo before me this 24 th day o( Jnlv Notary I’ublic; ^|Q N ^ ^ My Commission expires: ^ ^ \7—v AMOUNT CERTIFIED............................................................... s_______________ (Atl.ich expl.in.Uion if .imount certified differs from the .irnoorU .ipphvd tor.) aklmhec T: Boarman Kroos Pfister and A<?.<?or-i n t-oc Bv:Dale: _ nu ''■’■"^''"15‘^ ANIHI kiiik .Ml I»>K i \y Ml Ml • M yy rmi n iiiMM- mv • • i -ni Miniiii* IS. i.-r, siyv vn«x .yyra-, M... v sm..-;. to............... This Ccililicale is nol negotiable. The AMOUNT CEKIlfllD is payable only lo Ihe Conlrarlor named herein. Issuance, payment and ac ceplarn e ol payment are yyilhoul (ne|cidice lo any rights ol the Oyviier or Contractor undef this Contract APPLICATION -OH ?Ai-y£M FRCOECT SAXE:CRCSO PUBLIC WORKS AFCHITECT'S PECOECT SC: 1124.04 APPLICAIICS SC: FIVE APPLICATION jATE: 7/24/S2 PE.RICD IQ: 7/31/92 mitmmuiiiituMitii*******************************************^****’’''******''******^^********************* * ITEM * DESCHIPTICS ON 'WORK ‘SCHEDULED* WORK COMPLETED ‘MATERIALS* TOTAL * I * BALANCE ‘RETAISAGE* * SC. * VALUE *********************?R£S£STLY*CCMPLEIED*CCX? * TC ‘PREVIOUS ‘ THIS * STORED *i STORED ♦ ‘ FINISH APPL.a33T TO DATE ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ‘FXTISGS i PIERS ‘BLOCK BELCW GRADE ‘BLOCK ABOVE GRADE ‘SLAB 0 TOPPING *C.O. SI 8 9 19 11 12 1: 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 23 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 33 55 37 35 ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft 28275 * 36588 * 63651 ♦ 53303 ♦ 5596 ♦ ft 26275 * 36568 ♦ 63551 * 23500 ♦ 3000 * 0 ♦ n ft n ft 0 * 15403 ^ 2596 ♦ ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ♦ ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 • 0 * 0 * 0 ♦ 0 ♦ 0 * 0 * 0 ♦ 0 * 0 ^ 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 ♦ 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * ft ft ft t ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft 26275 M.OO ♦ 35553 M.OO ♦ 63651 M.OO ♦ 43303 ^0.81 ^ 5556 M.CO * 0 ♦ ERR ♦ 0 * ERR * 0 ♦ ERR * 0 ^ ERR ♦ 'j ^ ERR " 0 ♦ ERR * 0 ♦ 0 * 0 ♦ 10000 ♦ 0 ♦ ERR ♦ •• ft rep ft • w ft * i» : * ERR ‘ V * ERR ♦ G * ERR ‘ 0 ♦ ERR ‘ G ‘ ERR * G * ERR * G ‘ ERR * C * ERR * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 ‘ 0 * 0 * n *V * G * ERR ‘ C- * ERR * 0 * ERR * 0 ‘ ERR ‘ 0 ♦ ERR ♦ 0 * ERR * ‘ ERR ‘ * ERR * ‘ ERR ‘ * ERR ‘ * ERR * * ERR * ‘ ERR ‘ * ERR ‘ * ERR * * ERR ♦ ERR 'j 0 * 0 * 0 ‘ 0 * 9 ♦ 0 * 0 ‘ 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 9 * 0 * 9 * 0 ‘ 9 * 0 * 9 ‘ 0 » 0 * 0 ‘ 0 ‘ H W 4^4 » 4ft • ••• ^ m 9 -- - - - - - - - - ****************M*******»*iH*iiH*iiHM*M»***MMM*«M*.0**M***************»*******************0* ...... A. • \ a, ^ iiii 2828 * 3659 ‘ 5355 * 4330 * 560 * 0 * 0 ‘ 0 * 0 ‘ fl * 9 ‘ 0 ♦ G * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 ‘ 0 * 0 * 0 ♦ G ‘ 9 ‘ 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 ‘ 0 * 0 * 9 ‘ 0 * 0 * ■3 ‘ 0 * n *♦ 39 ♦ * ♦ 0 ‘ ‘ * 0 * £FR * 0 ‘ ilitiiiiiiiiiiJilSiliitJHililfMtM^i^iM********^******^**************^^^************************************ ♦ * TOTAL * 157423 • 155424 * 2155? * G * 17742: *0.95 * 10000 * 17742 * ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦.♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦(k************************************************************************* APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT .m documint r.rnTO rnwKjpp\. ——— ----------'PKOIECI; Orono City M.ill/Pojlce and Public Works Hull dings19 (OWNER):City of Orono1335 Brcvr» Road Soulli Crystal Bay, MN 55323 FROM (CONTRACTOR): Steenberg-Watrud Const. VIA (ARCHITECT): 10255 Inver Grove Trail Boarnian Kroos Pflster and Assoc. __ Inver Grove Hts., MN 55076 North Second Street CONTR,ACT FOR:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Minneapolis, MN 55401 (ln-.iructions on tcvef«ie side) p*c.t ONE or rv'.is CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT CHANCE OROER SUMMA^ ------------------------- APPLICATION NO: TwoPERIOD TO: 7-31-92 ARCHITECT'S PROIECTNO. 1124.04 CONTRACT DATE: Di*»ribwlio»? to:□ OWNER□ ARCHITECT □ CONTRACTOR□□ Char.3e Orders approved in previous months by Owner TOTAL additions Approved this Month Number Date Approved TOTALS DE Due I IONS ^ uu Applicl.cn for Pa>n,t,.t h.is been oai^tfhe ri Documetds, lh.it all amounts have been herein is t^dUr CONTRAet6R:^ r 0-1 nstruction. Inc. Date: 7-24-92 ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT ine Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT CTKIIFIED. Application is rnade for Payment, as shown below, in connection with ihe ConiMrt Conlinualion Sheet, AIA Document C703, is attached. Contract. 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM........................................ j 342.500.00 2. Net change by Change Orders ........................!,.. ^ 4 J. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (line I ± 2).........t . 2‘, 500.00 4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE....................S •136,833700^ (Column G on C70J) l7.-b \ \0.00 5. RETAINAGE: intt.oci a. JiL % of Completed Work $ d3r3H-;00* (Column D + E on G703) b. iiL % of Stored Material $ -i7572-00- Mcc.co (Column F on C703) Total Rctainage (Line 5a + 5b or .60 Total in Column I of C703).................................... S _ 1-3,865 rOO 6 H3TAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE...........................i~124.950.00 (Line 4 less tine 5 Total) 7. LFSS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMEN F (Line 6 from prior Ccriilicale)...............S_ 27,000.00 8. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE..................................... ^ ~97,950re0 • 9. BALANCE TO^FINISH, PLUS RETAINAGE.........$ 1217^50.00 ---------<l-ine^3,t6ss Line 6) /__________111 rrrf f t j j jj j.777 State of: f ^ '' : i•rn iQj^ef^fe, My Commission expires: f AMOUNT CERTIFIED.......................................................... , ARCmTEC^T^ ’*'^*^'’ certr4cd cfr/Iers Uom Ihti applied for.) By:Date: AIA DOCuMl.NI cm?* \rmi ^nop; am** '^iTMiru *i . . t I IP s » r 1/ «. . , *•• • • M \* • c Dai This Ccrt.licale is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTirirD is payable only to the Contractor named herein Issuance, p.iymenl and acceptance of pay'meni are without pr».|.idice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract. OliONO CITY HALL/POLiCE AND PUBLIC WORKS BUILDINGSCONIINUATICN SHEET AM DOCUMENT C70.3 PACf AIA Document C702. APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing Contractor's signed Certification is attached. In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage fer line items may apply. TACIS APPLICATION NUMBER; Two APPLICATION DATE: 7-2<i-92 PERIOD FROM: 7-01-92 TO: 7-31-92 KREMER & DAVIS, Inc.N? 4(i435WATEnrnooiINC, coNinAcions since W4S 39(K).ii;i I i;iu;oNsnim Nt MINfJ[ Al’OUS. MN fi'. I.'M (012) 7PH 5B35 tf- SOLD KRAUS ANDERSON COSNTRUCTION CO. 525 SOUTH 8TH STREET REMIT TO; P.O BOX21C31 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55421 INVOICE DATEjULY 13# 1992 MINNEAPOLIS MINNE'’''TA 55404 PLEASE REMIT FROM THIS INVOICE TERMS: NET 10 DAYS FROM INVOICE DATE DFSCnilMION JULY 10#ORONO CITY HALL (2ef RPrElVW? JUI. I9!)2 V;vl* O;*' DUE ACCOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO 1% PER MONTH. 12% ANNUAL SERVICE CHARGE AMOUNT $ 1,490.00 i C O ••I • I . v;l-f -I ••r •! •* • . • • • •‘ V '*'?* .iV -t . ; -•' 1’. > ’ 'V • f’S, •r'*V .• \Vj-V^ aV ; i* • • • • * M I •• •. ••‘t: •’•V ; fe: %' .■ •I’ 4- '• • • « \ . . • * * • ■u\ k *. * ** . . . - 1 ■ .'.•••T-f'iiV •' • • . •» »J. .".w I • V.*. m 40435P.o. BOX 21031 MINNI-APOLIS. MN 55421rEjULY 13/ 1992^IT FROM THIS INVOICE,T 10 DAYS FROM INVOICE DATE ............ ....... V"...amount '$ 1,490.00 / liM I, t . SERVICE CHARGE .1 .I *' 0.; #» <Hf'''. f.I •. . t • < . . : * .• . - • ^ < •« * i V APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AIA POCUMtNl G702 (instructions on reverse sk M pace om or PACES --------------------- application NO; 3PERIOD TO: 7-31-9210 (OWNER):City of Orono 1335 Brown Road South Crystal Bay, MN 55323 IROM (CONTRACTOR):Allied I'echanlcal Systems 3A0 Michigan St., Hutchinson, MN 55350 CQNIRACT FOR: Mechanical Work________CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENTPROIECTOrono City llall/Police and Public Works Buildings Distribulion 10:□ OWNER□ ARCHITECT□ CONTRACTOR□□CHANGE ORDER SUMMARYChange Orders approved in previous months by Ownc'TOIALApproved Ihis Monthj ryopj^ApprovedJliL i:B)?. TOTALS By,Chao^^Pfdcrs addiiions VIA (ARCHITECT): ARCHITECT SBoarman Kroos Pfister and Assoc. PROIECT NO; 1124.04 222 North Second StreetMinneapolis, MN 55 4 01 CONTRACT DATE:Application is made (or Payment, as shown below, in connection with Ihe Contract. Continuation Sheet, AIA Document C703, is attached.t 390,000.001 ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM........................................... S-------------2. Net change by Change Orders....................................... JDEDUCTIONS -0- The undersigned Contractor cerlifies that to the best ol ihe'Contrac.or’s knowledge, inlormalion and belief ihe Work covered by lliis Applii alion (or Paymcnl has been comirleled in accordance with the Contract Documents, tint all amounts have been paid by the Contractor (or Work (or wliich previous Cerlihcales (or Payment were issued and payments received (rom the Owner, and that current payment sliown herein is now due. CONlfi^vCTOR: Alllfed Mechanical Systems of Hutchinson, Inc. ,,y. JS ^ ^ __3- IT.ile ZLl2-Q_:^^ CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 ± 2)..........................SA TOTAL COMPLETED & SIORED TO DATE......................S(Column C on G70J) Ib^.ooS RETAINAGE:a 10 % o( Completed Work S —4j.9A2_i.QQ —(Column D + F on G703)b i0_ % of Stored Material S _^A82-ii0fl-----(Column F on C703) TotalRetainagelLineSa . 5bor ^ Total in Column I of C703)...............................— T —?^7".n0— _ 0. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE ...........................T (Sri.nSnrftfl HlA-3 (Line A less Line 5 Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT (Line 6 (rom prior Certificate)................$ ??*???*»? 911-^ 0. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE...................................................$ 9. BALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINAGE..........................$ ______(Line 3 less Line 6) State of: Minnesota Subscribed and.j/woriV to bJotcJmc^[W[s County ol: McLeod BCCKVosfUE ^ rOTAItV PUBLIC • MINNESOTA ? ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In accordance willi lire ConiracI Documeirls, based ixt on sile olrsetvalions and the daia conrpiismg the above application, Ihe Arcir.leci ce. ubes to lire Owner that to the best ol the Architect's knowledge, miomrahon and bel.O Hie Work has progressed as indicated, the quality ol the Work is in accoidaiice wiili die (ronliai.1 Dot umenis. and the Coiilractor is entitled to payment ol the AMOUNI CLUlll IID Notary Public: Afc t-' My Commissiob expires AMOUNT CERTIFIED W...............................|C-in^Eiip. June (Much exphnadon il amoimt cerdiied ARCtiiTfCT: Boarman Kroos Pfister and Associates By:Date; This Certificate is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only to the Contractor named lietein. Issuance, paymen' ,.nd acceptance of payment are without prejudice to any rights o( ttie Owner or Contractor under ttiis Contract. ___ AIA UUCUMtNI C702 • AITtlCAFION AND aHhIlt AM I OK IV\SMIN1 • MAY •.'liD IDIItON • AIA- • fc mi mi^llRlCAN INSUIUlt Of ARCinUCIS. 171S NIW VOKK AVINUI. N W. WASIIINC.ION, D C 70001. WAnNlIKi: Unlicentdd pl>olocopy ’nt| vlol#lfs U S. eoiiy'tnt'l '•'« «nd I* »ubIeclloleo"tpfO»*«v''°"' C702-1983 Vi'(1:.:CONTINUATION SHEETAl/ Document C702, APPLICATION AND CERTIFICAIE TOR I’AYMCNT, containing Co ilraclor's signed Certification is attached.In tabulations below, amounts are slated to the neaiest dollarUse Column I on Contracts where variable rctainago for line items may apply.AIA DOCUMENT C703 {instructions on reverse side) pa C c OF PACtSAPmCATTON NUMn[R:3APPUCATION DAiE:7-20-9Z PERIOD TO;7-31-92 ARCHITECT’S PROIECT NO:I •■ V 3 A D c D E F G H 1ITEMNO.DESCRIPTION OF WORK SCHEDULED WORK COMPltlED K^AIERIALS TOTAL %BALANCE RETAINACEVALUEIROM PREVIOUS AIM^LICAHON (Di E)IMIS PERIOD PRESFMIY STORED (NOT IN 0 OR E)COMPLETED AND STORED TO DAI E (D-^E + F)(G + C)TO FINISH (C - Q1.site Utilities 5,415.002,708.00 2,707.00 5,415.00100 -0-2.Pig. Rough-ln Pig. Rough-»ln ^at.Labor 21.717.0040.354.004.343.007.263.00 4.285.006.861.00 i/ 000.0 o 4-:M«9 iOO 21.717.0014.124.0010035 -0-26,2-30.003.Pig. Equipment Pig. Equipment Mat.Lchor 49,810.005,735.00 7,399.00 «16,444.0033 33,366.005,785.006.Htg. Rough-ln Hlg. Rough-in Mat. Labor 2.687.00 4.632.00 2,687.00 2,687.00.00 -0- 4,632.00 5.Htg. Equipment Htg. Equipment Vent. Rough-ln^ Vent. Rough-ln Mat. Labor 41,515.00 4,694.00* • 41,515.00 4,694.00 6.Mat. Labor 23.522.00 71.416.00 1.646.00 3.570.00 1.646.00 3.570.00 7 5 21.876.00 67.846.00 7.Vent. Equipment Vent. Equipment Mat. Labor 82,964.00 3,665.00 • 82,964.00 3,665.00 8.Pipe & Duct Ins. Pipe & Duct Ins. Mat. Labor 6.360.00 4.240.00 6.360.00 4.240.00 9.Refcig. Piping Refrig. Piping Nat. Labor 7.524.00 5.016.00 7.524.00 5.016.00 10. 11. Performance Bond Pig. & Htg. Permit G 6,800.006,800.00 1,884.00 6,800.00 1 1,884.00 ] 00 00 -0- -0- TOTAL 390,000.0028,214.0021,252.00 S CpB"?.*'® 24^B2U0a SSl^i.cc* 74,287.00 315,713.00 AIA DOCUMINT C70.1 • AITLICATION Af H CP IlfK'MI fOR lANMfMT • MAV l'»»n • MA* • O f.ifll iMinniic or ♦‘•ruiT- . -ir ‘ ^ . vork AvrNur nv • c >F V?.CiSUNACE APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT oocwiwr C702 (insimrtom on .ov,-.... s,d,.i m.,ioN.o.—' -----------------— - ............. LI. 11 c D..ui;^ APPIICATK.^N NO: Tw >PROIECT: City Hall cS Public Works Garage - Orono, MNTO (OWNER): City of Orono1335 Brown Road South Crystal Bay, MN 55323FROM (CONTRACTOR): Gephart Electric Co., Inc .VIA (ARCHITECT); Boatman, Kroos, Pfister3600 LaBore Road & AssociatesSt. Paul, MN 55110 222 North Second StreetFlprtrical Minneapolis, MN 55^01CONTRACT FOR: Electrical Distribution to:□ OWNERPERIOD TO; 07/01/92 10 DARCHITECT07/31/92 □ CONTRACTORARCHITECTS □PROIECT NO; □CONTRACT DATE:CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENTCHANCE ORDER SUMMARY _-----------------------------Change Orders approved in previous months by OwnerTOTAL additions dfductionsApptov^d IHVs IhonthNumber 1 Date Approved PAC* • *^ « «»*»# ) ' totals Net change by Change Orders ---------------------------------> information and belief the Work covered by this Application for Paymeni has been completed in accordance with the Contract Documents, (hat all amounts have been paid^by the Contractor lor Work for which previous Certificates (or Payment were issued and payments received from the Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now due. CONTRACTOR: Gephart Electric Co., Inc. Date:07/17/92 Application is made for Payment, as shown below, in connection w.th the Contract.Continuation Sheet, AIA Document C703, is attached., 279,400.001. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM.......................................5------------------------------2. Net change by Change Orders...................................S----- A 60“^c. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 ir2)........................S —- * ---------4 TOTAL COMPLETED «. STORED TO DATE S--------------------------------(Column G on G703)5. RETAINACE:a. IQ- % of Completed Work $ ---------(Column D + E on G70J)b. _% of Stored Material S---------------------------- (Column F on C703) Total Retainage (Line 5a + 5b or Total in Column I of G703)....................................^ 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE.................................5 (Line 4 less Line 5 Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT (Line 6 from prior Certificate)..............S 8. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE.............................................\ 9. BALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINAGc......................5 ’ '— _____(Line 3 less Line b) Stale of; Minneso^ Subscribed and swoi Notary Public: My Commission exp 4,981.70 44.835.30 22.311.00 22.529.30 TTiT J WXSHINQTOW CPUN% 9r12-^ ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on data comorisine the above application, the Architect certifies to the Owner that to the best of the Architect's knowledge, information and belief the Work has progressed ns mdicated. the quality of the Work is in Documents, and the Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT URTiriED. AMOUNT CERTIFIED..........................................................'------------11 (Attach explanation if amount certified differs from the amount apf^ed for.) ARCHITECT; 'I'his Certificate is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only to the Contractor named herein. Issuance, pavment and acc; .Manceof payrnent are without prejudice to anv rights of the Owner or Cumraclor under this Contract. Date; r.707.1W1 fl ’I-INVOICE NO DATE INVOICE NOBIWDESCRIPTIONAMOUNT INVOICE TOTAL INVOICE TOTAL aS«TIt«^i iut Sn:£' U* iiol tfaiCHiicN )c 02 cm HALL A PUBLIC HOHKS GAIACE - OR n ^ ^ l-jCu citi •..A 4. Hf?LlC«TIuH ills. j7/i7/^l f’z,yl0u v7/0i/?I TG O/za S/t I f#GhIitC7 3 ifi A nm» flB « 3 L ru t F G h I £»££^^iCa K Cu^ L£TtL‘^_.TuIhl CGnt L&ila 'Shm Cc . pet HihiHOc is3C uF Vhlup rnEvIuuS N A P dttJl • 4 7u r lii L 0 V 0 0 V G 0 • V H •- m m m*>«vaa /3yw00 G G S,000 IGg 0 « V L V G G G «• V G 0 p \J ft iS,N0 ISfSvO G G iGyGGG ivG 0 V TSruMV • V V u V <• V 0 HR NZ • V 4 l,3v0 500 250 0 TGG 4^iyG&O 4 SmICc L iy7w byCVG G DyGOG 7yGG0 m V 4 • ^ »• •s,ooc iGySz:G A3yG27 44 i7y373 rlXluMsS L </s;V G G i2y4L<A;Ki M S4.3CC p 0 V G G o4yjGG % V 3CW 4 lyiOO ^!V *.'• 2y.W ,'G . CfC* • V n OfiCv 7n o!v V A ,4^/2*»pfOoO J MOTORS L ioyoiz 0 G G G 0 iOyOOG G N bySOO 0 V G V V/b|30G 0 oeViCcs L 5|7 ‘>i V V G G G 3y7GG 0 ft S ^ Vff/SAt 0 V G G 0 « ^ • Ty/W V fiR£Muw L Af •V V V j V A y .^GG • V M 2,SvO m G • 0 G V 2|3G0 4 V 3£ua I7i L i,000 0 G G • V/AyGGO 0 4 2}(o00 0 G G G G 2? yOGG m V SOUC) a>STQi L /X 0 0 0 G G 792 0 4 1,200 0 G « tj G Ay2vG % V/ COMWICMTIOi^L A V 0 0 G G 5yGGC G 4 lfO#V V 0 G G G iy370 0 S!1E L Sy^i)• V 0 0 G 0 0 y v*^/G G 4 iy49G p V G G G V/0 rHu£ iwip«L T i4y7?V *. V yC,.* G ••7,.>47 y v<3.Sp • •C? AfCitT I7Ty*H^v» 24,:-}G -♦f ,2 a . 22TyG"*3 G < * i] I.-, •... . ^i',.■ r, tr. ■n ^ ...4: .• .. .. Ai.. ..ni; li TO; FROM; DATE; Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator /7CQlt'.'^fCILMEETING AUG 2 4 199? CmOFORONO August 22, 1992 SUBJECT; Selection of CounciImember(s) to Serve on the Long Lake Fire Contract work Group At the August 18th meeting concerning the Long Lake fire contract, it was suggested as the process of working out the contract details progresses, it may be helpful to have a representative or two from the City Council participating in the contract meetings. The Council may at this time select a member or members to serve on the work group. TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator A//' August 20, 1992 COUNCIL MEETING AUC Z 4 199? CITY OF ORONO SUBJECT: Establishment of a Work Session to D'scuss Fire Service Issues As was discussed at the conclusion of the August 18th meeting regarding the Long Lake fire contract, the Council will need to meet in a work session to review the contract issues as the negotiation process continues. If it is clear prior to the Council meeting, when sufficient additional information will be available concerning the contract, the Council may want to schedule the work session. .''p ' ¥ n mM i n r r* > ti j ■ 11 ‘CGU^^CIL MEETING To; Prom: Date: Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron, Moorse, City Administrator August 21, 1992 7 AUG 2 4 1992 CITY OF ORONO Subject: Income Limits for Special Assessment Deferral Attachments 1. Memo from John Gerhardson 2. Resolution Amending Income Limits for a Assement Deferral Special The current income limits used for a soecial assessment deferral program are the HUD/CDBG Very Low Income Limits. For a two person household, the income limit is $20,400 per year. Staff is recommending these limits be raised to the Lower Income Level which is $30,900 for a two person household. This is 80% of the median income for the Minneapolis/St. Paul area. In comparing the two income limits, a $9,000 assessment would result in a first year payment of $1,200 which would be 6% of the $20,400 income limit. The $1,200 payment would be 4% of the $30,900 income limit. Isv 1r i , r ( A. —r.' TO:Ron Moorse, City Administrator PROM:John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director DATE:August 19, 1992 SUBJECT: Assessment Deferral Income Adjustment With the start of the Stubbs Bay Sewer project, we are receiving requests for assessment deferrals. One of the qualifications for assessment deferrals are the income limits. Typically these income limits are those recommended by HUD and are the income liimits used for qualifying for a Housing Rehabilitation grant of which the City of Orono has allocated monies from the Community Development Block Grant Programs (CDBG). Those income limits are usually adjusted annually, but because Hennepin County administers the program, the income limits are not an annual concern. The income limits for assessment deferral have not been adjusted since 1990 and are also income limits for the very low income and not the low to moderate income level which is used for Housina Rehabilitation grants. I have proposed a resolution adjusting the income limits for the assessment deferral program. k ML. ^ DATE: TO: FROM: June 10. 1992 Urban Hennepin Councy SubrecipienCs Hennepin Councy Office of Planning and Development <:ilRmr'T* 1992 CDEG PROGRAM INCOME LIMITS--SECTION 3 16^ 1992) Enclosed are che revised income limits for lower-income (80% of median) and very-low-income (50% of median) households. These income limits are based on the HUD estimates of median household income for Fiscal Year 1992. As required by statute, adjvistments have been made by HUD In the income for smaller and larger households by using the four-person household as a base and applying percentage adjustments for household size. These income limits must be used in calculating household income eligibility for all CDBG funded activities which need to document low/moderace income benefit. These income limits are effective until further notice. MSA: MPLS./ST. PAUL FY 1992 MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME: $51,000 Ou (80%) Lower Income (50%) Very Low Income 1 Person $27,000 $17,850 2 Person $30,900 $20,400 3 Person $34,750 $22,950 4 Person $38,600 $25,500 5 Person $41,700 $27,550 6 Person $44,300 $29,600 7 Person $47,850 $31,600 8 Person $50,950 $33,650 I A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE PROGRAM FOR DEFERMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PERSONS 65 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono is the official governing body of the City of Orono; and WHEREAS, M.S.A. Section 435.193 through Section 435.195 authorizes the City of Orono, upon proper application, to defer the payment of special assessments against any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older on January 1 of the payment year and for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments; and WHEREAS, Section 435.194 authorized the municipality to establish an interest rate to be added to the deferred assessment which shall be payable in addition to the deferred assessment: and that Orono had adopted such a program under Ordinance 2.62 Q984 recodified). Resolution 1093 (dated November 13, 1979) and Resolution 1779 (dated June 10, 1985) and Resolution 2844 (dated August 27, 1990). WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the deferral of assessments should be granted to any person otherwise qualified who makes proper application to the City of Orono on forms prescribed by the County Ass sor of Hennepin County and by the Orono City Council and for whom the City Council determines that it would be a hardship to make the payments, based upon the following criteria: Number of Persons in Household 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Maximum Income $27,000 30,900 34,750 38,600 41,700 44,800 47,8f0 50,9. j Assets not including homesteaded property of $25,000, income and as.?ets as defined in Hennepin County's Utility Connection Program. J NOW, THBRBPORB, BB IT RBSOLVBD BY THB CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OP ORONO IN A RB6ULAR MBBTING ASSBMBLBD, that the assessments against any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older and for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments, be deferred for a period of time not to exceed five years subject to the aforementioned financial criteria, upon submission of an appropriate application signed by the qualified person, and which may upon expiration of initial or any subsequent renewal deferments may be reapplied for, and subject to the applicant meeting all the necessary criteria upon reapplication be deferred for an additional period not to exceed 5 years; and BB IT PORTHBR RESOLVED, that the right of deferment is automatically terminated under Section 435.195 if; 1. The owner dies and the spouse is not otherwise eligible; 2. The property or any part thereof is sold, transferred or subdivided; 3. The property should lose its homestead status; or 4. If for any reason the City determines that there would be no hardship to require immediate or partial payment. Adopted by the City Council the the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meetir? ‘eld August 24, 1992. Barbar C* 4T1 •Peterson, Mayor ’‘'ttrsT : Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk COUNCIL MEETINGTO: FROM: Ronald Moorse, City Administrator Dorothy Hallin, City Administrator AUC : 4 1992CITY OF ORONO DATE:August 19, 1992 SUBJECT: Performance Evaluation/Compensation Adjustment - Carole Haseman According to the Administrative and Personnel Policies the probationary period is 1 year of continous service after appointment. On September 9, 1992, Carole Haseman will have completed her 1 year probationary period. During this period Carole has been observed by staff, department heads, the public a.id myself. Throughout this period she has performed her tasks in a satisfactory manner. Under the City Compensation Plan, Carole Haseman, is eligible for a v’age adjustment from Level 4, Step I ($10.492/per hour) to Level 4, Step II ($11.109/per hour) effective September 9, 1992. Date: Ron Moorse, City Administrator John R. Gerhardsonr Public Works Director August 19, 1992 COUNCIL MEE. G AUC 2 A 1992 CITY OFORONO Subject: Temporary Employment - Orono Golf Course TO: FROM: Ron Moorse, City Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director COUNCIL MEETING AUC 2 < 199? CITY OF ORONO DATE:August 19, 1992 SUBJECT: Stephen Johnston Park Commission Member On August 4, 1992 at a regular Park Commission meeting Park Commission member Stephen Johnston submitted his resignation effective that evening. Stephen stated that his work schedule is such that he is unable to attend scheduled meetings due to conflicts. It is recommended to accept Stephen Johnston's resignation and to draft a letter of appreciation for Council's signature. It is also recommended to place an ad in the local newspaper to advertise that there is an opening. fWfixsi w _ LIST 0? LICENSES FCR COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR MEETING O? August 24, 1992 CCu.MCiL MEETING AUG c ^ 199? CITYOFORONO . SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT Gear West Duathlon 5k run-30k bike-4k run September 27,- 1992 7 - 10:30 a.m. r t;' Am Date: To: From: Subject: August 14, 1992 Orono City Council Police Chief Steve Sullivan Special Event Permit I have reviewed the application from Gear West Biathlon to have an event on September 27, 1992. I have no objection and would recommend approval of this application. 1 ‘ -I'ji.i.i ai:-.^v-1 . . ...t, -■' --•.'‘I »■ . ■ . Ii.iah ?*^ zrmi. w ^ • Fee: $50.^ARADES & SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT APPLICATION .^ITY OP ORONO, MINNESOTA :one Nunber: "0^'^'^ -ce; /'-rP^CyV' UCyo^^ ^^CxJHJL p ^ dress: _______ .tyr state. Zip: (7S^^, 4-{i^ , A^. Ll ^CL 0r& -tt) jpOA^/Xj ^ rijiA\ ' h<Jie.la^ ;rson(s) and/or Organization(s) Handling the Event: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *:e of Event; mu jtiP^ ^Hours of Event; S’* 3^ ^ /^.’H) a^KMzhc jti}C-rJ ‘ Jr.r 7^^ /./hiIa/^y/ntynccuruJi:, surance Company; vdv'bcr !JVi vt(V-- —.iy of insurance*crr7x^ s{IE^itted with thxs application. am aware of all applicable State and other laws regarding parades and otcAl e^ent^and-will abide by same. I also agree to hold the Caby_o = ■-ono harmless from all liabilities that may arise direcwly ^zO.Ov •cm the parade or special event approved by the granting of YOU M ’ ■ J i V T r*» •’* '’i I ’ “ »* ^ T1 1 m .^•^•jTxv 'iva fai*i __________________7/f .cnature ^Date \pproved:Denied:3v: ioiarks \ _ \ 3o ic 3ike.■J ^ n}- O’'' \o'^ yv'^''" Af, C-<^JUC*^ xcc-o i^K- dvco^ .«vD tciTp^ C..A\^^ ikt^ butcQt''^^ U»p rc5L/ b^c?<^ t GEAR WEST DU A THLON 5k run-30k bike-4k run Sunday. September 27 Start: 8 30AM vave start (if neccessan^). Pre-registered racers may pick up numbers from 7.00 to 8 00 a m at race site. Race day registration is also from 7 00 to 8.00 a.m. Location: Orono High School, 15 min vest of Mpls H'»'y 304/12. One mile vest of Long Lake. MN. turn north off Hvy 12 onto Old Cr>'stal Bay road. The high school is the second building on the left. Coarse: The run is a flat cross countr>' course on grass and gravel. The bike is on rolling hills, county roads 201,24 and 6 Entry Fee: $20.00 before September 20. $25 00 after September 20. Make checks payable to Gear West Duathlon 540 Virginia Ave. Long Lake, Mn 55356 Awards: Top male and female finisher and to the top three men and vomen in each age group; 19 and under, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59,60* Comments: (^1 Jan at Gear Vest Ski 8c Bike (612) 473-0093 or home (612) 449-9774 viih any questions. Also! ve will ride the bike course Saturday, August 19th at 7 30 a m Please join us ENTRY FORM!!!!!! (Entry fee must accompany entry form) NAME:AGE;.SEX: M_f. address-.PHONE: CITY:STMEi IIP: Please read, understand and sign the following waiver: I know that a runing and biking race is a potentially hazardous activity. I should not enter and run unless I am medically able and properly trained, I agree to abide by any decision of a race official relative to my ability to safely complete the run or bike race. 1 assume all risks associated with running in ihes event, including but not limited to: falls, contact with other participants, the effects of the weather, including high heat, and/or humidity, traffic, road conditions, all such risks being known and appreciated by me. Having read this waiver and knowing these facts and in consideration of your accepting my entry. 1 release Gear West Ski and Bike, and all sponsors, their representatives and successors from all claims and liabilities arising out of my participation in this event though that liability may arise out of negligence or carelessness on the part of the persons named in this waiver. Racer s Signature --------------------------- Parent's signature (if racer is under 18). PATE .DATE Send to: Gear West Ski k Bike--5 ‘10 Virgnia .We-Lc.ng Lake. .Mn 55356 PERM.IT FOR USE OF BUILDING Orono Ind. School Dist. #S78 Effective !»::er:jr •'_ _ _ _ _ _inclusive. Issued_ _ _ _ _ _:• _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ App 1 icat ion of_ _Esr i«^5t :k: I 5_ _ _ _for use of _ _ _I'n * L:c e--::’:_ :n ur.* _ _ _ _ _on_ _ _ _:i:r,C3v_ ie;;cept schoo 1 holidays) Schoo 1. hours PertTiit n«.;mber__2 of Education. hasdeen Granted subject to the rules of the Board Charges: _Cftit'il:"_ _ ”(character of meeting) f erson in charge_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone Payableto; Orono Indepencent School District #S79 Attn: Community Educaticn Director ^Commini t'/Educat ion Director) ‘1 ii Long Lake Volunteer Fire Dept. Lon^ Lake, Minnesota 55356 ClJe^ 10 : 1 Jo. h treujmO-i^ s^r -^our ai~(P ro*nO ;r,>i p e.par^'r^eni- u>/// ftaiui +ra^!i- “i ^ S„U,I fr.« r S!' ML'^'^r-irta rte. A a-tate-frw-a 1 - •kAib«i*^LM*CAn l^ 4 • r ‘a £2 o ^ £2 IN> r* Cic: O <£> rv* 3m 3 1 ly ■ "V* . •«^*■». V • # * -»-i~ «> --------------W ■<>.■ -w .«*m- EMP •YTD CURRENTNAME DPT GROSS GROSS471S88000ANDERSON, BRUCE L 31 23135.04 1612.26474563339BOBZIEN, SUE A 31 17050.96 987.52476921819BORIS. SCOTT W 31 4220.94 463.50471840871BOSMA, JAMIE L 12 9946.08 698 36475443862BRINKHAUS, JOHN F 42 26633 62 1568 57476663143CARLSON. STEPHEN C 61 2467.50 549.50472503991CHESWICK. GARY B 31 29065.78 1680.96469526026CORNICK, JAMES L 31 30330.94 2034.04476643387DELANEY. JANE E 93 2840.29 359.63475989721DEMflOUSKI. JAY C 31 239/8 14 1284.00471963129DREi.'lL. ROBERT P 93 185.00 105.00468821018ENGLISH III, IRVING 31 29012 06 2130.46468622840ERICKSON, DOUGLAS J 93 396.00 54.00472529007ERICKSON. KURT R 31 25893.24 1526.40468701868FISCHENICri. DAN T 31 29864.20 1744.77507585424FRITZLER. JOHN M 31 28103.52 1646.96469686562GAFFRON, MICHAEL P 33 24349.06 1434.01468420832GERHARDSON, JOHN R 42 34020.25 1885.69469087884GOMAN, DAVID J 35 2665.86 180.28474667812GREGORY. JAMES D 42 22456.01 1128.80475380151HALLIN. DOROTHY M 12 20974.61 1235.28477500666HANSEN. STEVEN C 42 19667.76 1165.19 475444249 HANSING, CAROL J 31 9609.18 540.34 477463877 HASEMAN. CAROLE 12 14330.25 839.37 472745694 HEUER, JOHN C 61 3869.00 624.00 388625358 JENSEN, ROONEY W 93 1845.00 320.00 471569863 JOHNSON. BRADLEY P 31 270/3.33 1562.43473141624JOSTROM, FOREST J 93 1666.90 154.88 477647279 KARNITZ, RICKY D 31 3158.92 245.65 475604753 KENNEN, JANICE M 31 4104.15 278.94 504260307 KNUTSON, CHARLOTTE A 15 16767.59 987.53 472500574 KUEHN, THOMAS M 15 35820.18 2109.60 121262417 MABUSTH, JEANNE A 33 30492.70 1795.84 475344512 MCINTYRE, WILLIAM E 93 1097.26 162.75 480843542 MCNICHOLS, DAVID L 31 13600 75 1538.38 476U18974 MILLS JR^ WALTER H 91 2046.00 222.75 477700023 MOORSE, Donald j 12 36252.80 2038.40 334506281 MOROWCZYNSKI. JAMES 31 2'363.24 1947.19 477028779 NELSON. DAVID D 35 j317.94 160 90468909535OBERAIQNER, SCOTT G 42 18232.70 948.88 476783251 OBRIEN. RANDY L 92 19950.01 1054.32 470700901 OMAN. LYLE E 33 24348.94 1434.01 469848107 PALMER. GREGORY A 42 17953.28 1264.52 475382983 OUAST. WAYNE A 92 23950.03 1579.09 473748173 RATHBUN. BARRY J 92 19750.31 1054.30 473609629 ROSS, JOHN A 93 418.00 35.75 470566529 SCHOENHOFF. JOHN B 31 43/5.44 164 80 469629194 SKREEN, DALE S 42 19111.09 1013.21 475569177 STEFFENHAGEN, RONALD 93 20975.80 1235.28 267460042 SULLIVAN. STEPHEN X 31 32761.49 1941.12 472563051 THOMTON. MARK R 31 25214.46 1469.29 474663296 TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE F 31 26439.71 1607.03 470704904 TOMCZYK. MARK W 31 25733.35 1497.83 475505292 VANG, BRUCE L 33 20974 57 1235.28 468629488 VEE, LINDA S 12 15728.19 946.87 500403192 WALTERS, LINDA G 15 18953.42 1145.28 477881539 WECKMAN, STEPHEN J 33 17617.01 1088.00 61,718 99 1992 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATl HC3113 08/07/92 CHECK REGISTERAMOUNT HC9114 HC9115 HC9116 HC9117 HC9117 HC9118 HC9118 HC9I18 HC9il8 HC9I18 HC9118 HC9118 HC9il8 HC9118 HC9118 HC9118 HC9118 HC9119 HC9120 HC9120 HC9120 HC9120 HC9121 HC9121 HC912I HC9122 HC9122 HC9122 HC9122 HC9122 HC9J21 HC9122 HC9122 HC9122 HC9122 HC3122 CS/07/92 08/07/92 08/0^/92 08/07/92 08/07/92 08/07/92 08/07/92 08/07/92 08/07/92 08/07/92 08/0^/92 08/07 /92 0V07/92 08/07/92 08/07/92 08/07/92 08/07/92 08/07/92 08/07/92 08/07/92 08/07/92 08/07/92 08/07/92 08/07/92 08/07/92 08/07/92 08/07/92 08/07/92 08/C7/9? 08/07/92 08/07/92 08/07/92 08/07/' 08/07,^4. 08/07/92 08/07/92 120.00 120.00 • 900.00 900.00 • 2.079.CO 2,079.00 • 128.78 128.78 • 129.80 194.7' 324.52 • 428 10 306 125 127 511 17 674 14 120 ISO 111 2.629 97 00 96 64 83 60 96 31 70 04 C5 92 98 * 20.00 20 00 • VENDOR BUS RECORDS POSTMASTER ORONO DIST 278 SAFE BEN POSTMASTER POSTMASTER 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL iV NATL IIT NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL MEDICA ITEM DESCRIPTION MAIN! CHECK POSTAGE RFD INVOICE ERROR SPCE BILLING SWR WTR BILLING SWR WTR BILLING PICA 7/5 FICA 7/5 FICA 7/5 FICA 7/5 FICA 7/5 FICA 7/5 FICA 7/5 FICA 7/5 FICA 7/5 FICA 7/5 FICA 7/5 FICA 7/5 CHESWICK 910.00-ST MN JUNE SALES TAX 10.00 ST HN JUNE SALES TAX 14.00 ST MN JUNE SALES TAX 2.005.00 S': MN JUNE SALES TAX 1,119.00 • 391.64 B&D UNDERGO TH12 FRONTAGE WTRiS 712.50 B4D UNDERGO TH12 FRONTAGE SS85 14,416.07 B4iD UNDERGO IHI? FRONTAGE ST85 15.520.21 • 63.29 1ST NATL FICA 7-19 433.28 1ST hATL FICA 7-19 306.93 1ST NATL FICA 7-19 112.66 1ST NATL FICA 7-19 153.74 1ST NATL FICA 7-19 511.60 1ST NATL FICA 7-19 17.23 1ST NATL FICA 7-19 682.33 1ST NATL FICA 7-19 18.01 1ST NATL FICA 7-19 106.42 1ST NATL FICA 7-19 159.64 1ST NATL FICA 7-19 ACCOUNT NO. INV 01-4342-040-13 01-1262-000-00 01-3511-000-00 01-1050-000-00 72- 4321-549-91 73- 4321-569-92 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 01-4x42 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 01-4142 72- 4142 73- 4142 74- 4142 039-12 039-1? 069-15 111-31 115-31 174-33 185-35 249-42 290-61 549-91 569-92 590-93 01-4151-129-31 01-2222-000-00 01-3530-000-C0 72-2222-000-00 74-2222-OCO-OO 24-4531-426-00 24- 4531-426-00 25- 4532-486-00 01-4142- 01-4142- 01-4142- 01-4142- 01-4142- 01-41^2- 01-4K2- 01-4142- 01-4142- 72-4142- /3-4142- 020-K 039-12 069-15 111-31 115-31 174-33 185-35 249-42 290-61 549-91 569-92 07-31-92 PAGE • P O. • MESSAGEMANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL 1992 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTERCHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTIONHC9122 08/07/92 108.34 2,673.47 •1ST NATL PICA 7-19HC9123 08/07/92 HC9123 08/07/92 1.081.29 143.00 1.224.29 • SAFE BEN SAFE BEN AUG FEE AUG FEE 8,089.11 1.104.14 14,416.07 370.26 534.41 2,225.26 FUND 01 FUND 24 FUND 25 FUND 72 FUND 73 FUND 74 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL GENERAL FUND PERM IMPROVE REVOLVING F 91 PUBLIC FACIl . /iSTR F WATER OPERATING FUND SEWER OPERATING FUND GOLF COURSE OPERATING FD 26,739.25 TOTAL ACCOUNT NO INV 74-4142-590-9301-1050-000-0001-4306-299-72 07-31-92 PAGE 2 • P 0. • MESSAGEMANUALMANUALMANUAL •••-CKS 1992 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE23700208/19/92 AMOUNT 19.00 19 00 CHECK REGISTERV.' NDORA-1 MINNETONKA RENT ITEM DESCRIPTION RENTAL ACCOUNT NO INV 72-4343-549-91 08-19-92 PAGE I • P 0 • MESSAGE 237014 237014 08/19/92 08/19/92 1.315 70 1.286 57 2.602 27 • ALL STAR ELECTRIC ALL STAR ELECTRIC REPAIR LFT STATN REPAIR LS822 73-4344-569-92 73-4344-569-92 •••-CKS 237016 08/19/92 24.245.00 24.245.00 •ALLIED MECHANICAL PLBG-PW BLDG 25-4520-484-00 • • • .CKS 237037 237037 237037 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 J6 00 53 54 33 96 123.50 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF AUGIES MOBILE CHEF AUGIES MOBILE CHEF • • • . COFFEE SANDWICHES SANDWICHES 74-4802-591-94 74-4802-591-94 74-4802-591-94 CKS 237039 08/19/92 725.81 725.81 •earl F ANDERSON ASSC SIGNS 01-4233-249-42 • • • .CKS 237074 237074 237074 237074 237074 2370 '4 2370M 237 74 237074 237074 237074 237074 237074 237074 237074 237074 08/19/92 08/19/9208/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 100. 178 170 46. 413. 1.413. 1.641 164. 20. 9. 46 . 2.467. 124. 864 124. 383. 8.168. 00 82 79 50 57 50 26 58 00 25 50 00 29 00 28 80 14 • BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONEF.ROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO ROSENE As- ROSENE A^H ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ENG RETAINER-JUNE ENG CONSULT JUNE MSA-FUNDING CRD15 FOX ST PERMITS PARK DR STORM SWR ENG APPLIC JUNE PRELIM DESIGN BRDG MCCULLEY RD INSP ENG CONSULT JUNE ENG CONSULT JUNE INSP STREET JUNE INSP/EASEMNTS JUNE ENG EASMNT JUNE DRAWING REVIEW JUNE ENG EASMNT JUNE LS9 DRAWING REVIEW •••-CKS 01-4J04 01-4305 01-4305 01-4305 01-4305 01-4305 23-4305 23-4306 25-4305 25-4305 25- 4306 26- 4306 72-4305 72- 4306 73- 4305 73-4531 -200-41 -200-41 -249-42 -249-42 -249-42 -840-71 -355-00 -354-00 -480-00 -480-00 -486-00 -408-00 -436-84 -438-86 -434-82 -569-92 WOT?- 237085 237085 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 31.99 31.99 5.05 47.93 pUOGET printing BUDGET printing SHOES COPIES ENVELOPES 01-4221-129-31 01-4210-039-12 01-4210-129-31 •••-CKS * A « .CKS 1992 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE 237085 08/19/92237130 237142 237142 237150 237150 237157 237199 237199 237204 237243 237248 237256 237256 237256 237256 237256 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 AMOUNT 27 00 79 98 •2<>8 31 298 31 • 545 19 221.42 766 61 • 44.30 42.90 87.20 • 342.95 342.95 * 225.42 11.680.00 11.905 42 * 12 94 12.94 • 250 00 250.00 • 22.529 30 22.529.30 • 414.01 8.53 9.16 4.98 17.57 454.25 • CHECK REGISTERVENDORBUDGET PRINTINGCOLONIAL LIFE INS CO COPY DUP PR INC COPY DUP PR INC CULLIGAN CULLIGAN OAHLGREN SHARDLOW ROLF E ERICKSON ROLF E ERICKSON ENG REPRO SYSTEMS GAB BUSINESS SERVICE GEPHARDT ELECTRIC ITEM DESCRIPTION COPIES 08-19-92 PAGE 2 ACCOUNT NO INV IPO • MESSAGE 01-4210-174-33INS01-4152-129-31 TONER RENTAL 01-1261-000-00 01-42)0-129-31 WTR SOFTNER WTR SOFTNER SUPPLIES SEPT & OCT FEE COPIES MJ KOVACEVICH ELECTRICAL-PW BLDG GENUINE PARTS CO PARTS GENUINE PARTS CO DARTS GENUINE PARTS CO PARTS GENUINE PARTS CO PARTS GENUINE PARTS CO PARTS 01-4343-099-17 74-4343-590-93 COMP KPLAN AMEND-SWR 26-4306-408-00 01-4210-059-14 01-4307-059-14 01-4210-174-33 73-4370-569-92 25-4520-484-00 01-4232-249-42 01-4232-249-42 72- 4234-549-91 73- 4232-569-92 74- 4232-590-93 n H •-CHS••■-CKS •**-CKS * « «-CK5 •**-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS 1992 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 08-19-92 PAGECHECK NO.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV23725808/19/92 5.45 QLENWOOO INGLEWOOD WATER 01-4324-099-175.45 •237274 08/19/9?19.799.10 GRESSER INC CONCRETE WORK-PW 25-4520-484-00 19,799.10 ■ 237278 08/19/92 76.00 GOPHER STATE ONECALL JULY FEE 72-4306-549-91 237278 08/19/92 114.00 GOPHER STATE ONECALL JULY FEE 73-4306-569-92 190.00 • 237280 08/19/92 500.32 HACH CHEMICAL CO REPAIR 72-4340-549-91 500.32 * 237284 08/19/92 5.18 HAPPYS POTATO CHIP CHIPS 74-4802-591-94 5 18 * 237295 08/19/92 106.50 HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED GRASS SEED 01-4233-249-42 106.50 • 237308 08/19/92 20.00 HENN CTY SHERIFF DPT REPAIR 01-4342-.129-31 237308 08/19/92 507.98 HENN CTY SHERIFF DPT JUNE BOOKING 01-4358-08U-16 237308 08/19/92 70.00 HENN CTY SHERIFF DPT JUNE BOOKING 01-4358-080-16 597.98 • 237317 08/19/92 51.36 HIGHWAY 55 RENTAL RENTAL 01-4331-249-42 51.36 • 237335 08/19/92 21 30 ILLIES L SON DIRT 01-4233-249-42 21.30 • 237337 08/19/92 3 05 IMS/MN TAPE 01-4210-039-12 237337 08/19/92 3.06 IMS/MN TAPE 01-4210-069-15 237337 08/19/92 3.06 IMS/MN TAPE 01-4210-174-33 237337 08/19/92 3.06 IMS/MN TAPE 01-4210-249-42 237337 08/19/92 3.05 IMS/MN TAPE 73-4210-569-92 15.28 • •••-CKS ft A II .CKS •••-CKS ft ft ft -CKS •"•-CKS ft ft ft -CKS ft ft A -CKS •"•-CKS •"•-CKS 1992 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE237385 237388 237395 237395 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 CHECK REGISTERAMOUNTVENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV7.21 7 21 •KEAVENYS DRUG SUPPLIES 1.341.00 1.341.00 * KREMER & DAVIS INC WATER PROOF PW BLDG 10.65 10.65- KOEHNENS STANDARD KOEHNENS STANDARD PART PAT 74-4210-590-93 25-4520-484-00 01-4341-129-31 01-4341-129-31 237395 08/19/92 10.65 10.65 ft KOEHNENS STANDARD PAT 01-4341-129-31 237396 08/19/32 7.443.00 KRAUS ANDERSON CONST CONSTR MGR-JULY 25-4306-480-00 237396 08/19/92 13.897 .15 21.340.15 ft KRAUS ANDERSON CONST REIM EXP/SUPV-JULY 25-4399-480-00 237435 08/19/92 57.60 LOGIS SUITE 300 MNT CONTRACTS 01-4340-059-15 237435 08/19/92 84.00 LOGIS -SUITE ?00 MNT CONTRACTS 01-4340-174-33 237435 08/19/92 854.39 LOGIS -SUITE 300 LOGIS APPL SUPP JULY 01-4352-069-15 237435 08/19/92 495.29 LOGIS -SUITE 300 LOGIS APPL SUPP JULY 01-4352-129-31 237435 08/19/92 260 03 LOGIS -SUITE 300 LOGIS APPL SUPP JULY 01-4352-174-33 237435 08/19/92 5 40 LOGIS -SUITE 300 DP COURIER JUNE 01-4353-069-15 237435 08/19/92 42.28 LOGIS -SUITE 300 DATA PROC JULY 01-4355-039-12 237435 08/19/92 616.90 LOGIS -SUITE 300 DATA PROC JULY 01-4355-069-15 237435 08/19/92 844.23 LOGIS -SUITE 300 DATA PROC JULY 01-4355-129-31 237435 08/19/92 400.20 LOGIS -SUITE 300 DATA PROC JULY 01-4355-174-33 237435 08/19/92 1.050.00 LOGIS -oUITE 300 UTIL BILLING PROGRM 72-1500-000-00 237435 08/19/92 7.70 LOGIS -SUITE 300 MNT CONTRACTS 72-4340-549-91 237435 08/19/92 156.03 LOGIS -SUITE 300 LOGIS APPL SUPP JULY 72-4352-549-91 237435 08/19/92 119.37 LO'^IS -SUITE 300 DATA PROC JULY 72-4355-549-91 237435 08/19/92 2.450.00 LOGIS -SUITE 300 UTIL BILLING PROGRM 73-1500-000-00 i:37435 08/19/92 11.50 LOGIS -SUITE 300 MNT CONTRACTS 73-4340-569-92 237435 08/19/92 364 04 LOGIS -SUITE 300 LOGIS APPL SUPP JULY 73-4352-569-92 237435 08/19/92 10.85 LOGIS -SUITE 300 DP COURIER JUNE 73-4353-569-92 237435 08/19/92 355.98 8,185.79 * LOGIS SUITE 300 DATA PROC JULY 73-4355-569-92 237439 08/19/92 11.89 LONG LK FORD TRACTOR PARTS 01-4232-249-42 237439 08/19/92 15.98 27.87 ft LONG LK FORD TRACTOR PART 01-4232-249-42 237441 08/19/92 46.68 46.68 ft LONG LAKE TIRE SERV REPAIR 01-4342-249-42 08-19-92 PAGE 4 IPO • MESSAGE•••-CKS•••-CKS •••-CKS II *-CKS I ft * H CKS •••-CKS 1992 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT CHECK REGISTERVE NDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 08-19-92 PAGE 5 ACCOUNT NO INV • P 0. • MESSAGE23744S08/19/92 163.35 163.35 •LYMAN LUMBER lumb :r 01-4232-290-61 ft A A .CKS 237459 08/19/92 29.27 29 27 •MACOUEEN EQUIPMENT PARTS 01-4232-249-42 •••-CKS •••-CKS 237467 237467 237467 237467 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 130 130 502 381 1.145 80 80 02 81 43 MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE SEPT INS SEPT INS SEPT INS SEPT INS 01-4151-069-15 01-4151-129-31 01-4151-174-33 01-4151-249-42 237474 08/19/92 16.291.00 16.291.00 • METRO WASTE SEP FEE 73-1282-000-00 •••-CKS •••-CKS 237477 237477 237477 237477 23747^ 237477 237477 237477 237477 237477 237477 237477 237477 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 36.61 18.92 36.44 2.83 18.93 2.82 18.93 2.82 23.49 18.93 2.82 2.82 18.92 205.28 • MIDWEST BSNS PROD OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-1261-000-00 MIDWEST BSNS PROO OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-039-12MIDWESTBSNSPRODOFFICESUPPLIES01-4210-039-12MIDWESTBSNSPROOOFFICESUPPLIES01-4210-059-14MIDWESTBSNSPROOOFFic:SUPPLIES 01-4210-059-14MIDWESTBSNSPROOOFFICESUPPLIES01-4210-069-15 MIDWEST BSNS PROO OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-069-15 MIDWEST BSNS PROO OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-1210-129-31 MIDWEST BSNS PROO OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-129-31MIDWESTBSNSPROOOFFICESUPPI Its 01-4210-174-33 MIDWEST BSNS PROO OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-174-33 MIDWEST BSNS PROD OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-249-42 MIDWEST BSNS PROD OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-249-42 237480 08/19/92 209.69 209.69 • MIDWEST ASPHALT ASPHALT 01-4233-249-42 ft ft ft -CKS 237495 08/19/92 24.98 24.98 • MN BENEFIT ASSN SEPT INS 01-4152-129-31 ft ft ft -CKS 237522 08/19/92 12 25 12.25 • MTI DIST CO SUPPLIES 74-4232-590-93 •••-CKS 1992 CIIY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 08-19-92 PAGE 6 ACCOUNT NO INV. • P.O. • MESSAGE 237532 •••-CKS 237534 237545 237*^46 237546 237546 237548 237548 237548 237548 237548 237548 237548 23V*^48 237548 237548 237562 237562 237582 237590 237597 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 08/19/92 6.53 6 53 • S3 48 53.48 • 80.38 80.38 • 330.00 115.00 115.00 560.00 * MOuOWCZYNSKI/JAMES MEALS MOTOROLA INC MAINT NAVARRE AUTO REPAIR NAAB/THERESA NAAB/THERESA NAAB/THERESA RPAIR 7/27 8/3 8/10 MTG 8/17 MTG 8/4 MTQ 01-4381-129-31 01-4342-249-42 01-4341-174-33 01-4306-039-12 01-4306-174-33 01-4306-290-61 41.73 NAVARRE HARDWARE SUPPLIES 01-4210-174-331.47 NAVARRE HARDWARE PARTS 01-4231-099-1740.81 NAVARRE HARDWARE PARTS 01-4231-290-61.05 NAVARRE HARDWARE PARTS 01-4231-290-61 109.28 NAVARRE HARDWARE PARTS 01-4232-129-31 74.49 NAVARRE HARDWARE PARTS 01-4232-249-42 55.33 NAVARRE HARDWARE PARTS 01-4342-099-1726.74 NAVARRE HARDWARE PARTS 72-4234-549-91104.88 NAVARRE HARDWARE PARTS 73-4234-569-92 65.40 NAVARRE HARDWARE SUPPLIES 74-4232-590-93 520.18 • 69 93 NSP UTILITIES 01-4324-290-61157.38 NSP UTILITIES 73-4324-569-92 227.31 • 14.84 OMAN/LYLE MILEAGE 01-4381-174-3314.84 * 115.44 OTTEN BROS SOD 01-4233-249-42115 44 • 4,603.51 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA ^/3-16 01-2031-000-00 ••*-CKS ***-CKS •**-CKS * a n -CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS 4,603,51 * 1992 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTERCHECK NO . DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO IN'237598 08/19/92 12.00 PERA INS SEPT INS 01-4152-129-3112 00 •237613 08/19/92 1.604 26 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR TRUCK REPAIR 01-4341-249-421,604 26 *237621 08/19/92 1,370.30 MEDICA CHOICE SEPT INS 01-3872-000-0023762108/19/92 944.20 MEDICA CHOICE SEPT INS 01-4151-039-1223762108/19/92 502 00 MEDICA CHOICE SEPT INS 01-4151-069-1523762108/19/92 2.354 60 MEDICA CHOICE SEPT INS 01-4151-129-3123762108/19/92 424 30 MEDICA CHOICE SEPT INS 01-4151-174-3323762108/19/92 753 00 MEDICA CHOICE SEPT INS 01-4151-249-3123762108/19/92 753.00-MEDICA CHOICE SEPT INS 01-4151-249-3123762108/19/92 753.00 MEDICA CHOICE SEPT INS 01-4151-249-4223762108/19/92 239.04 MEDICA CHOICE SEPT INS 72-4151-549-9123762108/19/92 358.56 MEDICA CHOICE SEPT INS 73-4151-569-92 237743237743237743237743237743237743 08/19/9208/19/9208/19/9208/19/9208/19/9208/19/92 54.95 54.95 54.95 54.95 54.95 54.95 329.70 ‘STRINGER STRINGER STR7 (GER STR».<GER STRINGER STRINGER BUS SYSTM BUS SYSTM BUS SYSTM BUS SYSTM BUS SYSTM BUS SYSTM FAX MAINT FAX MAINT FAX MAINT FAX MAINT FAX MAINT FAX MAINT AGMNTAGMNTAGMNTAGMNTAGMNTAGMNTH ft A A H «237752 08/19/92 516.60 516.60 •SUBURBAN TIRE INC TIRES 237756 08/19/92 150.00 150.00 • STEPHEN SULLIVAN CONF 237768 08/19/92 168 34 168.34 • TELEPHONE SPECIALIST SEPT MAINT 237775 237775 08/19/92 08/19/92 537 82 213.01 750.83 • TOWN 4 COUNTRY TOWN 4 COUNTRY AUG CLEANING AUG CLEANING ft ft ft ft A ft 237796 08/19/92 741.75 741.75 • UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS iHiTi]wmmi] •Bell 15.60 OBRIEN RANDY MTGS (15.60 *1.950.00 NSP UNDRQRD SERVICE i1,950.00 A12.731.25 NORWEST BANK HINN NA INT DUE 9/1 ^200.00 NORWEST BANK nx.4N NA PAYING AGENT 9/112.931.25 *5.062.50 AMERICAN NATL BANK INT DUE 9-15,062.50 Ik48.528.57 FUND 01 TOTAL GENERAL FUND1.805.84 FUND 23 TOTAL HUNIC STATE AID CONS FUN216.430.67 FUND 25 TOTAL 91 PUBLIC FACIL CONSTR F119,065.72 FUND 26 TOTAL12.931.25 FUND 43 TOTAL 1980 IMP BOND D/S FUND5,062.50 FUND 44 TOTAL 1982 IMP BOND D/S FUND22.480.65 FUND 72 TOTAL WATER OPERATING FUND23.676.90 FUND 73 TOTAL SEWER OPERATING FUND2.698 31 FUND 74 TOTAL GOLF COURSE OPERATING FD452.680.41 TCTAl 1 ei fc7g; 0 qJ’ a iii ^ ^g ^i oO. m,r% £,1 COUNCIL MEETING AUG a 4 1992 CITY OF ORONO ^' . Tirf'fs Mayor Jerome P Rockvam 471-9515 Councilmernbers Harlyn Dill 471*8857 MaryAnn Thurk 471-9286 Wm. D. WeeKS 471-7285 Carl Widmer 471-9429 City ojj Qhiiuig '^akk P O. BOX 452. SPRING PA.RK. MINNESOTA 55384 • Phone: 471-9051 • ON LAKE MINNETONKA August 7, 1992 Senator Gen Olson 6750 County Road 110W Minnetrista, MN 55364 Dear Senator Olson: On behalf of the other Council members, as elected officials, we wish to express our concern with the powers granted by the legislature to appointed officials, specifically the Department of Natural Resources as it pertains to the Shoreland Regulations. We understand the concern of preservation of our precious re­ sources, especially our lakes. We also understand that many areas of the state have no regulations and these rules are designed to preserve these areas from possible destruction from over development. However, our metropolitan area lakes, especially Lake Minnetonka, have had rules and regulations, promulgated by local e’ected officials for many years, unlike outstate areas. Now, through the authority of the legislature given to appointed people, the DNR is imposing regulations onto all lakes including the Metro Area. These rules were designed for pristine lakes in outstate Minnesota. For many years local elected officials have accepted the res­ ponsibility for preserving the lakes as well as to develop their cities to be productive, beautiful places to live. The electorate has guided their steps through the democratic process of election. If the people are unhappy the next election tells the story. We don't understand the DNR's attitude that local officials are not capable of legislating adequate controls. Senator Gen Olson August 7, 1992 Page 2 In an effort to comply with their new regulations this City has spent around $8000.00 so far on possible ordinance revisions plus much time spent on meetings, communications, etc. yet the DNR is unrelenting in their pursuit to control development in our communities. Is this the democratic way? 0 '/ ^ s/ncereljr,' / / Jet^ofrte^P. Rockvam -M/Cyor cc: Representative Steve Smith Lake Minnetonka Mayors .1 ^ »m I August 10, 1992 PvijG 1 e Dear Citizen: The Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) invites you to participate in a public meeting to discuss the effectiveness and efficiency of state environmental services, laws and regulations, and how reorganization of state agencies might improve the delivery of services and administration. Governor Carlson’s Commission on Reform and Efficiency (CORE) is exploring how the services and efficiency of the state’s environmental agencies can be improved, and will be making recommendations to the Governor. Also, the 1992 Legislature considered a biU that proposed extensive consoUdaUon and restructuring of several state environmental agetKies. The Environmental Quality Board, in response to these two initiatives and its own statutory mandate to coordinate the development of state environmental policy, believes that decisions regarding these important issues should be based upon a record which includes public consideration and commenL Therefore, the Environmental Quality Board, in conjunction with CORE, will host a series of public meetings to solicit the answers to four basic questions: I. What state environmental policies should be revised, and in what way. to provide better, more efficient protection for the state’s environment and natural resources? 2. What problems currently exist with the delivery of environmental services? 3. What problems currently exist with the administration and enforcement of environmental laws and regulations by state agencies? 4.What reorganization or restructuring of state agencies would be necessary or desirable to provide more efficient and effective environmental services and administration and enforcement of environmental laws and regulations? l^ach meeting will be conducted by a panel of Board members. The information gathered will be used by the EQB to develop a strategic plan for Minnesota’s environment, and will be made available to CORE to assist in development of its recommendatioiis. Meeting dates, times, and locations are listed on the following page. I urge you to attend one of these important meetings and express your opinion on any or all ot the above questions. Robert Dunn. Chair Minnesota Envircnmental Quality Board I miiiiiiiiiiioiiiiiniiiii isiciitiSlim.SI.Hii.mS5is!i sisiis-sios iiisissis-sssi sunsiiiiiiiiimsiiiiiii r MEETINGS HAVE BEEN SCHEDULED IN THE FOLLO\MNG MINNESOTA CITIES: St. Cloud Monday August 24. 1992 7:00 to 9:30 p.m. St. Cloud Civic Center 10 4lh Ave. South Grand Rapids Tuesday August 25. 1992 7:(X) to 9:30 p.m. Grand Rapids City Hall Council Chambers 420 N. Pokegama Ave. New Ulm Wednesday August 26. 1992 7:00 to 9:30 p.m. Citizen’s Bank Arcade 113 N. Minnesota St. (above Kunenh Chiropractic Center) Detroit Lakes Thursday- August 27. 1992 7:00 to 9:30 p.m. Detroit Lakes City Hall Council Chambers 1025 Roosevelt Ave. Marshall Monday August 31, 1992 7:00 to 9:30 p.m. Marshall City Hall Cc-uncil Chambers 344 W. Main St. Rochester Tuesday September 1. 1992 7:00 to 9:30 p.m. Rochester City Hall Council Chambers 224 First Ave. SW St. Paul Wednesday September 9, 1992 7:00 to 9:30 p.m. Room G15 State Capitol Building 1(X) Constitution Ave. To facilitate planning for the meetings, we need to know which meciing(s) you plan to attend. Please return the form below, to: Teresa Murphy. Minnesota Environmental Quality Board. Room 300 Ceniennial Building. 658 Cedar Street. St. Paul. MN 55155; or call Teresa at (612) 296-4096. □ Yes. I plan to attend the meeting in Name: Street Address: City/State/Zip:, Plea.se send to: Teresa Murphy. MN Environmental Quality Board. 300 Centctirtial Building, 658 Cedar Street. St. Paul, MN 55155 THANKS! i| i f MIIMtUEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT P.O. Box 387, Wayzata. Minnesota 55391 U«£ M!HN£T3K»* board OF MANAGERS: James R Spensley Pres •JonnE Thomas • Rcrtara R Mc Mit Roneo D Efosc-:»C ’.'Axxirow Love • Claivson iinciey • Thomas Macte ji July 13, 1992 I VIA TELECOPIKR/591-46fi5 Ms. Valery Reinaas Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District 2055 North Lilac Drive Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 A‘JG 1 ^V , , • . * ^ • 1* Re: Preliminary Review of Trunk Highway 12 Alternative Route Dear Ms. Reinaas: The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District ("MCWD") wishes to emphasize several key points which the MCWD has offered in its earlier written and oral comments on the draft scoping decision document presenting the Environmental Impact Study Alternatives for Trunk Highway 12 (Long Lake to Delano). A copy of our earlier written romments is again enclosed for your reference. project is of significant interest to the MCWD, because all of the proposed alternatives cross a number of wetland areas heart of the District for at least six miles, tnis stage of the process, our comments are preliminary in nature, and focus specifically on the wetland and stormwater management issues presented by this project o .Manager Erickson stated at the public hearing, the MCWD Board of Managcis concluded, at its June 16, 1992, regular meeting, that none of the proposed alternative routes, as currently presented, meet the MCWD*s standard of providing the minimum impact on wetlands and stormwater storage capacity. Based T the preliminary information available to date, however, it would appear that the broadly-drawn southerly route may be the easiest to change in order for the project to meet the District’s minimum impact criteria. Nevertheless, with engineering and design changes, the other broadly-drawn routes could also be substantially modified to meet the minimal impact standard. For i fRE copy ii. f f. July 13, 1992 Page 2 example, one of the primary problems from the MCWD's perspective with the central corridor would be the significant fill that apparently would be required in Long Lake; since the MCWD engineers performed a preliminary review, it has been suggested that other design alternatives may require substantially less fill xn 1 afCo• The MCWp’s objective is to offer technical comments and participate in the environmental impact analysis regarding the water management issues within our jurisdiction for each of the alternatives proposed. Because of the significant wetlands, stormwater storage, and water quality issues involved in this project, the MCWD*'- Board of Managers expects MnDOT to consider carefully these environmental impacts early in the scoping decision process. The MCWD is firmly committed to the wetland protection and stormwater management objectives established in our Rules, and will apply them vigorously in reviewing MnDOT permit applications connected with this project. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Very truly yours. ames R. Spensley President, Board of Managers Enclosure 9LNS cc:Board of Managers Ron Quanbeck, P.E. Michael Panzer, P.E. je-^ty of Orono, P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, MN 55323 City of Medina, 2052 County Road 24, Hamel, MN 55340 City of Long Lake, P.O. Box "L", Long Lake, MN 55356 City of Wayzaca, 600 Rice Street, Wayza'.a, MN 55391 i -kiJ" i-T ■J .lAMES M. MONTGO^IERY. CONSUI/riNG ENGINKEILS. INC. MKMOIL\NDUM TO: FROM: SUB.JECT: DATE: Ron Quanbeck Tom Rasmussen .-7^ ; / fr/~ Preliminary Review of Trunk Highway 12 alternative routes May 28. 1992 I*URI\)SE fernatncs ton^rised of various road segments where identified as potential -ontcs for T H I contacted IE,TL and obtained an up-to-date draft scoping decision documeiit in which mire alternatnes. comprised of different combinations of eight right-of-way segments, are proposed going into me environmental impact study phase of die alternative decision making process. It IS imporuant to note that the proposed routes are preliminary in nature and are by no means tinalized. The purpose of this memorandum is to determine if a;i alternative that appears to have me least impact on the surtace water resources of the MCWD. DFiSCIUraON There are six segments that atTect the MCWD. The corridor is to be 350 to 400 feet wide. The six br^rdescHbedTsVnowl^'"'^*' ^ provided in the draft scoping decision document and are Segment B:Segment B begins east of Long Lake and proceeds south of Long Lake. It continues northwest through Orono uid continues northwesterly towards Maple Plain. The western portion of this route is located north of and generally follows Watertown Road. Setjment F:Segment F follows the existing T.H. ’2 corridor and would expand the existing corridor width to 3o0 to 100 feet wide. This segment would go directly through downtown Long Lake and west towards Lake Classen. Segment G:Segment G begins at Ferndale Road and proceeds northwesterly through the Wayzata Country Club Golf Course. It then follows a westerly route immediately south of the e.<isting County Road 6. Segment G heads west til it intersects with segment F, east of Lake Katrina. Segment J: Segment J is a northwesterly route contained within the existing T.H. 12 corridor and would tie into either segment G or F. Segment J would go through downtown Maple Plain. Segment K: Segment K extends either segment G or F west toward the east end of segment L located south of Maple Plain. .1- 1 i Segroent L. hegmeni L picks-up the tratTic from either sequent B or spcrmf^nr U' j a northwestorl, d.rocuon, past Maple Plain, ^p "^.ard Delano “ To analyze the potential impacts that these routes may have on wetlands within the MOWD I obtained aerial photographs from the City of Wayzata for each of the altern , ‘ superimposed the final alternatives onto U.S.G.S quadrangle topoCTaohic mm segments within the District. I overlaid the U.S.G S quads with MDNR w.h'^ a «7oll„ws:“>" The^e 'are s^mTan'^^d MDNR protected wetlands 835W, 857W and 918W. MDNR protected wetlands 830W. S31W, 81IW, 916W and 396W. In addition the thisToufe' P'Ptected waters. 15dP, ICOP and 162P, would also be affected by Segment B: Segment F: Segment J: P»«ntially affect MDNR protected wetlands 396W. 916W and Segment K: This se^nnent could potentially alTect MONK protected wetlands 9Hi\V mid 91SW. Segment L: So MDNR protected wetlands would be alTected by this segment. DISCUSSION S^e'’T^'.^TSoVsmdy"''''■"''’"''' disadvantages of the segments comprising Segment B: Segment F: Segment G: Segment J: The pnmary advantages m segment B is that it appears that it coulu be designed in such a way to minimize the impact on wetlands. In addition, the District should also coordinate placement of a water quality structure at the crossing of Lake Classen outlet creek The pnmary disadvantage of segment B is that it would aligner'”* wetlands. Particularly South Katrina Marsh as it is currently ^e pnmary advantage of segment F is that it would follow tha existing corridor resulting m a smaller area of land disturbance activity. However, a major noodpUin^"^ ^ s^^gment is that it would directly place fill in the Long Uke The advantages associated with segment G could include a slight shift in the proposed route further north to avoid MDNR protected waters. In addition, the Jt'stnct could coordinate with the MnDOT to construct a water quality structure at crossing 0 oisfeld Lake outlet creek. The primary disadvantage of this segment is that is has to connect to either segment J or K (discussed below) which ootn nave major wetland impacts. As with se^ent F. the primary advantage is that it follows the existing corridor and would have a smaller area of land disturbance. However, the Lake Katrina wetlands could be greatly impacted by this route. Fill would undoubtedly be placed within the Lake Katrina floodplain and Type III wetlands Segment K;The primary advantage of segment K would bo the fact that it would provide access to segment L which has no impact on any wetlands or floodplain. However to access segment L. segment K would directly dis.sect two MONK protected wetlands Segment L;As previously mentioned, the primary advarUage of segment L is that no wetlands or floodplains within the MCWD are affected. The primary disadvantage of this would be erosion associated with land disturbance activities due to the corridor and road construction. CONCLUSION Based upon the preliminary advantages and disadvantages of the segments previously discussed, the following conclusions are made: The E.I.S. alternative, which causes the least impact on the surface water resources of the MCWD is obviously alternative 1, the "no build" alternative. Of tlie build alternatives, it appears that the combination of section B + L (alternative 33) would prove to be the alternative that has the least negative impact for the MCWD. The proposed corridors and their alignments are preliminary in this stage. Further review should be performed throughout the Environmental Impact Study process in regard to the rules and regulations of the MCWD. If you hf ve anv questions, conuct me at ext. 215. 1 i _________________nr limUTlI I Wti«« TABLE 1 Prelimiimry Advantages and DUndvantages of the Se'gmenLs Comprising the TdL 12 Corridor Study • Would afTect only fringes of wetlands Could be shifted hirther southwest so it would not affect South Katrina Marsh. A water quality structure could be placed at crossing of Lake Classen outlet creek. - Follows existing corridor. • Smaller area of land disturbance. • Water aualitv structure would be placed at crossing of Wolsfeld Lake outlet creek Could be slightly shifted further north to avoid protected waters. Follows existing corridor. Smaller area of land disturbanci • Would provide access to segment L. No MDNR wetlands are impacted. Does impact 3 MDNR wetlands and some small type 2 wetlands. Potential erosion problems. - Places fill in Long Lake. AfTerts 6 .MD.NR wetlands and f.akes Affects 3 MDNR protected waters. - Potential erosion problems. Has to connect to segments J or K which have major wetland impacts. Would encroach into Lake Katrina wetlands. Would likely cause northerly shift of Baker Park trail into Lake Katrina wetlands. Would directly dissect 2 MDNR wetlands. - Land disturbance activities. i • ft- . ■s’---*-!*. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 3, 1992 ROLL The Orono Planning Corrmission met on the above date with the foI lowing members present: Chair Charlie Kelley, Ed Cohen, Candace Rowlette, Jeff Johnson, and Stephen Peterson. Maureen Bellows arrived after the vote. Charles Schroeder was absent. Th;' fol lowing reoresented the City Staff: Planning and Zoning Aa >• >nistrator Michael Gaffron, and City Recorder Teri Naab. Chair Kolljy called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. (m) COM. <EHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 4 - STUBBS BAY/MUSA BOUNDARY REALIGNMENT - PUBLIC HEARING 7:00 - 7:08 P.M. The Affidavit of Pub'ication a^^d Certificate of Mailing were noted. Ga f f ron explained that COitipreheiia i ve PI ari Amendment Nc. 4 is an amenament to induce the StuoDs Bay project area within tne Metropolitan Council’s urban service area boundary. The area includes 137 property, 125 of which are developed, and 12 vacant lots. The City is not proposing to change any district boundaries or zoning standards. The amendment is to meet the criteria set by the Metropolitan Council recuiring a plan amendment to show the boundaries of the MUSA line as the City continues to sewer various portions of the City. He noted that in the past the City "^as gone ahead with a project and later aoo I i ed for the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. The Metropolitan Council has now asked that in the future amendments be requested prior to commencement of a pro j ect. Johnson asked the time line for the current MUSA boundary line for the City. Gaffron stated that the City has not adooted a specific "Year 2000“ MUSA per the Metrooolitan Council’s schematic. He said that the Stubbs Bay area is the last of five areas identified in the 1980 Comprehensive Plan, which were generally expected to be sewered by the 1990s. He noted that the City does not have any plans for future amendments. He explained that Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 3 has not been adopted by the Metropol i tan Counci I as they have requested additional information, and intend to address the issue of 64/640. He added that when North Oaks recently went through the same type of request the City will soon be going through, they were eventually allowed to continue with their current development of 1 to 1 1/2 acre unsewered development without a problem from the Metrooolitan Council. rmii ~ I ~* MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 3. 1992 It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Johnson, to recommend approval of Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 4 - Stubbs Bay/MUSA boundary realignment. Ayes 5, nays 0. («2) OTHER ISSUES Chair Kelley asked what Is going to happen with the sewer project for the Long Lake development area. Gaffron said that is included in Comprehensive Flan No. 3. and the City is still working with Metropolitan Council to gain approval. ADJOURNMENT Chair Veliev adjourned the PIannInq Commission meeting at 7:10 p.m. Cl'.arlie Kelley, Chair Person .J 1 ) I 4 ’1 ■ ^ Alt I I . HENNEPINMuncs Suburban Hennepin Regional Pork District 12615 CounV %XXJ 9 PStnoum. MN 55441-1246 TewoKme (612) 56Q-Q000 Foe (612) 559-3287 Board of Commissfoners Ax3i1h S Anoef^on ChOf Sloomngion ^kc^lOtQl P foioff W» Chair BrcOlyr Cer.rer Jjuson Ne«on boser OviW Borme MoM P^ Dav'd : 3t cOrjis ' yd Btc wetr Eoifxa James M White Oono Douglas P Brvent SuDermteroent 6 SerteiQfv *0 the Boora f35^ ANf<i . I I'" AUV Augu: 1992 JUL 3 i Dtar City/Park Board Official: The Hennepin Parks Board of Connlssloners Invites you to participate In the Park District's Tour de French II Bike Ride and Festival on Saturday, August 29. He anticipate about 1,00 bicyclists. Hennepin Parks Is hosting Tour de French II In cooperation with local municipalities, bike shops, and several other organizations. Our purpose Is to promote bicycling as a healthy, safe outdoor recreation activity and to highlight existing local and regional trails serving the suburban Hennepin area. An additional objective Is to nurture public and political support for completion of the planned regional trail system. Tour de French II bicycle rides will start at four different locations within the City of Minneapolis and suburban Hennepin County. All routes converge at French Regional Park for a bicycle festival with music, food, and family activities. Enclosed Is a registration/information brochure which provides details of the event. Please join us In celebrating the sport of bicycling on the 29th. He'd appreciate your completing the enclosed registration form. Pre-registratlon deadline Is August 21; however, day-of-event registration will be accepted. If you have additional Questions about the program, call Judy McDowell, Special Events and Promotions Supervisor, Hennepin Parks, dl 559-6755. . ‘.icerely. dJudith Anderson, Chair / V* HENNEPIN PARKS BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Judith S. Anderson, Chair Nicholas P. Eoloff, Vice Chair Shirley A. Bonine Susan Nelson Boser David J. D Bin Heir James M. Hhite browski RECYCLED PAPER - Conserving Our Resources An Equoi Ooportunirv EnVover ktUm.: .bu,.. Hennepin Parks Tour de French II Bike Ride and Festival Saturday, August 29 Bike Ride Route • Choose one of four scenic routes to French R^ional Park. Routes are 30 - 40 miles round trip (trail descriptions on back). • Celebrity riders on each route, leaving; at 9 a.m a Routes are pavctl/crushed rock bike trails, and roadways. a Ail routes will be signed and rmite maps provided . • Designated rest-nfops. • Sag wagons and first-aid will Ih ? available. • Children under 16 must be accompanied bv an aduM. • TheTour de Fren«:h II» open to bicyclists of all ages and riding abilities. If you have a special need or concern, pleiue call Rob Duffler at 55^-90(X). • Helmets are highly recommended. Helmet renUl as'ailaMe at Fish Lake Regional Park. French Regional Park Bike Festival Festival Program: (10 a.m. - 3 p.m.) • Music - The band "Garth** will play, 12 • 3 p.m. • Bicyde Equipment Displays • Bic\*de Trail Map Information a Bic>*de Safety Informatica and Check a Bicycle Chib and Organization Information a Btcvcle Demonstration fealurirg antique bikes, highwheders, and unicydes. a Bike Corral staffed 10 a.m.- 4 p.m. • Sovietrek slide show, 130 p m. Welcome Program <c Door Prize Draiving I • 130 p.m. NEW! • Designated family route: Fish Lnke to French -16 miles round trip. Tour de French II Picnic Join in theoffidalTourde French 11 Picnic. Hot Dogs/ Brats/Beverage/Dcssert/Chipf. PartkipanU m pre-register to joifi thepienk. Served 1 l'i0-l:30 p hv Boy Scout Troop # W. PiftkipanU must m Boy Scout Troop # Registration a Regritration stations are located at each desig ­ nated trail start ( iee location i>ii back). Parking fee applies at Hennepin Parks locations. Check in 830*10 a m at regi^^lration stations. All participants nuist sign a liability waiver foim at the registration station. Pro*registration and day of ovi'nt registration accepted. Offered in cooperation with the following clllet, organizationa, and biwintaate! Fees • Tour de french II Bike Ride and Festival are Free? • Optional: Picnic, Adult • $3; Age 10 & under - $2 • Optional: Tour de French T-shirt - $8 (avaUa.4r to pw-rvgtMMcd partlclpiinfs only) City (4 Brooklyn Park Citv of Exctlsior Ctiv of httniiMpolls riiv ofOromi Cltv of Mlnnflonko t.'llv of Coklpn Valivy i.'lly of MapUCrovo Clly of nymouth AmvrkMi Lung A»«oc. Ar«a wy« CycU n|> BUothSkl tWnnHlrCyrW KldcFUw InMoUon MN Dopt. ef TraraportaHon MN Eatofiflion Sorvica hfN Drpt. <>f Nafural R moutcm MN Coalition of BlnrcUtlt MN Parkf /c Traflt Cotinril l*lyaioulh favewt Hostolkng 'mwnattofial MN AYH AAA f ounlaHon for Safety Skilful Door Prize nr.isbing Register to w-.. iktng equipment donated by local bike shops ana ..^encics. • For more inlomulhm, call 559-9000. • Vdufilecn are needed for this event. Please call 95W706 or 959-9000. Ys« miitt pce-ieginler lo be eligible lor door prizes. Pie-iegistrslion deadline is August 2L /our de hench Hennepin Parks Tour de French II Registration (Onv name per form • please (cel (rcc to copy) Name Phvne Adilirs^ C>nr Route I Route 2 Route 3 Kouto 4 Optional Start (tilt) Dike Ride/Door pn/c Jrawing T-shirt (Adult. M..X.XU Free Size FIcnic ____$3 Adult S2 Child Make checks payable to Hrnnepin Parks Mail to: Hennepin Parks, Tour de French U 12615 <!o Rd.9 ToUl Plymouth, MN 55441-1248 PRE-RttaSTRATION DEADLINE • AUGUST 21 L....■ - - • ■ 1 H>i<t t: ta cd tiaf %m ff—di Pirti Plivtd «kl Ipxtlcuw bOw Imll «*«d roadway fPMi Cacalalor dirngh MMwwtPobi arid Ply* •io«tk. Approai fNtyJiadiw* ftagktndaii fttHaw EMvMorCItyHdirwki-if LetS^- 3rd SttMU. laciiiior. OptiMnI Siait le»Ar«Ma4«yla03«)l V/IUMoaM. Ii latorartiEiiwoita fraadi lUglonai Padi P^vad and Mnwlniii Nha tmii and roadway ttwmifli BakarPbrIilUMffoo. down Old Cryaial Bay Road lo dw U m» UnaTnA. Hnar^ Ply* ■lardlilo fraiwb Ragiaanl PlMlri. AppraaiBwIaly ««iad». Wailittidia Wallaai Mar IM fUaanwPfodc Afoa.Couidy Road IfACoonly Rood 24. Mapli Plain. OptioBal Siaife Paffcara UdwParltalCoonly Road# ANIafiaInnrd# I*). R Coon Rif idi Pamta Ftoodi Ra fianal faiR via Eln Cfoali PaiR Roaarva ' Paoad Mko mi and loodtaay iron Ilia Brooii* lyn Pwk aida ol Coon Ropida Dam Rational Ph Iu dmnfli Ihp Cfoak fWfc Raaarvt, to Ml Udo Raplenol Mk. to Piancfi Rotpond Park. Apfvwmaaaly 41 Cl Wan Rtvar RoodMo.,Braa Myw Pnk. Optiona l RiaiR U bi Cloak Park Roa arvr TraUKaad r4dn*)or nak Laka Rrgtanal Park rrad gwa iad fmidyioni«.UmllM^. tako HatrM to ffonck Riglonal Prrk Pavod bika trod and roadway. TntR alone »ha Clnln of lokaa. Rian roadway Ihrt of||i Cok^m Vallay and Plyoioiiih to PratwH Piplaiial Park. ApproftiOMtolyJOinttaa* RagiatratioBRIati^iit UkaHoniatBandaliatt. * • AU Mitoogaa Itolad ara round tup Bike Ride and Festival... Saturday, August 29,1992 HENNEPINMIIKS /our efe JL HENNEPINHUIKS UklS County Road 9 Ptymoylk, MN 5S441-Ua RECYCLED PAPER ConMfvtng Oui n«iourcM I.'-, ..daWSsi I- p.i -Ak2 MINNETONKA .ONSERVATION DISTRICT MEETING AGENDA TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (TRC) Meeting of August 25. 1992. 8:00-10:00 A.M. Norwest Bank Building - LMCD Conference Room 900 E. Wayzata Blvd.. Wayzata Discussion and Approval of Minutes of 7/28/92 and this Agenda II. Flexibility Request Wayzata III. Follow-Ups on Flexibility Requests IV. Next Meeting r • %I AG-- 1 0 -- - - - -- .. m 1 ^I ail 1 g f I ras ■ lAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT MINUTES TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (TRC) Meeting of July 28, 1992. 8:00-10:00 A.M. Norwest Bank Building - LMCD Conference Room 900 E. Vayzata Blvd.. Wayzata I* Agenda and Minutes Minutes of 6/25/92 and agenda for this meeting approved. II. Flexibility Requests (Note: order reversed from agenda) B. Woodland Nick Duff. .Mayor, presented the City’s request. He beg» a by distributing copies of two ists, one which summarizes seven ways the City is more restrictive than the state standards and one which lists four areas in which flexibility is requested and gives rationale for the requests. The City is more restrictive with respect to lot size, has a 25 foot setback from protected wetlands that are not public waters, has a greater setback from roads, increased setback for sewage systems, tighter impervious limits, stricter standards for water—oriented accessory struct'ires, and a larger lot size requirement for allowing guest houses. Woodland is requesting a 50 foot structure setback from the OttWL and is proposing to compensate for the reduction by increased sewage system setback (75ft. vs. 50ft.). They also feel their larger lot requirement (2 acres) and limits on house footprint (no more than 10% of lot) will adequately compensate for any visual impacts associated with the reduced setback. A reduction in the lot width from 150 ft. to lOO ft. for nonriparian lots is being requested so the City can keep Just one width requirement for all its shoreland areas. They also feel their larger lot size and fairly large aide and front yard setbacks will mean little likelihood of lot widths less than 150 ft. being requested. Structure height is proposed to be limited to 35 ft. to be compatible with their existing development which includes numerous, very large homes. They feel the hilly topography and large lota will reduce the impact. The City also uses a definition of height which may be more restrictive in some cases than that required by the DNR regs. The last flexibility item involves the Groveland Assembly Grounds. They want to continue applying much smaller lot sizes and setbacks to this one area. It was developed many years ago with residences on small individual lota, but with much of the lakefront area free of structures and other large, open areas within the development. roi lowing Mayor Duffs presentation members asKea a few *0^3. and presence of wetlands were consideration by the MVCC a few years ago wUoUiiL *^ccept solely on-site systems for mentioned that testing of the wetlands ThL2^ revealed any adverse impacts from sewage svstems. There was some discussion of the lot width issue ana density in general and its relationship to n»? ?? unaewered areas. Nick Duff did point requires annual inspection of nSedJ S* upgrading or other maintenance whenneeded. Overall, members did not seem to have major concerns with the flexibility items requested by Woodland. A. Spring Park ‘^® presentation of this request. He con?2,nT«2‘® copies of an ll page document ® ®®®° summarizing the areas needing rtitiJi giving background reasoning, followed bydetailed information and rationale for each area. hiiLi^® 5^ several maps. Brixiua then explained some develoSeS (only .SJu?' niw r*^ undeveloped). He mentioned the City comp ted a SoS*t?;S*’!?®^;^^® in the proceas of ^ Stormwater Management the DNR^Shori?f«2®^?^®?“®?^ ^°®® n°^ comply with no iStLt^nn respects. The City hasof adopting new standards which would result in nonconforming status for uses in all zones. They contend dSteloomeSt^^anS^id landowner's rights, inhibitdevelopment, and adversley affect property values. dJJ a^to^d!lfiJSh They have inventoried background technical staJdlrH^ which parts of the City and areas of thestandards will require flexibility approval. S i n;"o I S?3 ■ whlS'i^eSive I Sjnelt ‘‘ denaitv raouirfUMM y**®' ‘ho city proposea to aeet DNR but to^rfrwJt areas designated for low density.exceed the. (up to 13 units/ocre) for high hJ ?*"■“>' *" ‘heae areaa would be controlledby requiring conformance with maximum density. lot size lapervioua lialta. and atorawater aanageaSit ;t.Sda?dl un the impervious surface issue, the City has determined that if all residential areas are considered, the existing development is below the DNR 25% standard. However, in the commercial and manufacturing districts, existing development greatly exceeds the DNR standard. These districts have from 82% to 93% coverage. The City proposes to allow impervious coverage at existing conditions in these areas, with redevelopment required to meet several conditions, including on-site stormwater retention and full compliance with the City Storm Water Management Plan. The Advanced .Machine and Balboa properties were specifically discussed. The City proposes to keep the existing mfg. zoning, but hopes to receive rezoning requests for future conversion to mixed use. with maybe commercial at ground level and residential above. They contend such conversion would have less impact on the lake than the existing and past manufacturing uses. On the height issue, the City is proposing to retain its 40 foot standard in most areas. They feel this is needed to keep existing development from becoming nonconforming. Finally. Brixius mentioned the City will not be allowing any water-oriented accessory structures. Members next made several comments. One commended the City for doing an excellent job evaluating their situation and identifying needed flexibility. Several said they felt some of the existing high-density developments should have had better screening. The City apparently has a requirement for development of landscape plans, but no specific standards. Steve Prestin suggested the City may want to consider a color requirement for these large developments to reduce their visual impacts. Ed Pick made a few comments about the DNR reaction to the proposal. He explained that they have met with City representatives and expressed strong reservations about some items, particularly high-density residential. He said he sees some movement in the City’s position on a couple of items in this presentation. Ed sees a problem with a setup that allows redevelopment in commercial and industrial areas to existing impervious conditions. III. Follow-Ups on Flexibility Requests Pick distributed copies of letters which have gone out to all the cities regarding the flexibility requests of Orono and Minnetrista. IV. Future .Meetings After some discussion. .\ug. 25 and Sept. 22 were selected for upcoming meetings. The Sept, meeting will be twice as long (8 - 12). I '1 N a yn A^/cr^ /'('’f j (tf/nK / ’! ■i Mr M4.I^ A m-ak i4v»vfnKi4, A*-A/--1 ^WKLIV/S v/d^-A. iM<y /W PAJ/f ^ rA.x/vv»<Mzh' \]aJ^Puk^ i l.Hc^. ..... .SPftj ‘-*&_PAp^, ■SP(UNd» PA<2t^ s, ?J ,^g».i..ni......... .-fli>.ut’..-»-^. »:i I 1 1 iiinMiffi mif rnii •.y. t-’ HENNEPIN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 320 Washington Avenue South : Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468 - PHONE (612)930-2500 J FAX TDD: (612)930-2513 (612) 930-2696 AUG ZQ Itw- DATE:August 16. 1992 TO: FROM: Those Listed Below Jerry 0. Smrcka Traffic Operations Engineer SUBJECT: Teaporary Closure of CSAH 146 In Long Lake On Monday, 24 August 1992, CSAH 146 (Brown Road/Lake Street) will be closed for road construction between Orchard Lane and U.S. Highway 12. A marked detour will be provided via Watertown Road. The road will be opened to traffic by 19 November 1992. HENNEPIN COUNTY Board of Commissioners Bureau of Public Serv1ce*V.T. Genzilnger Public Works Staff Sheriff's Department Sheriff's Radio Tower Library Oirector-Robert Rohlf EMERGENCY SERVICE MeihooTSt Hospital'Eiiergency MINNESOTA DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION North Memorial Medical Center Emergency Waconia Ridgevlew Hospital- Ambulance Service Health One Transportation Midwest Med Kab Hennepin County Medical Center Metro Division Engineer-W. Crawford Metro Division Traffic Engr.-J. Katz Road Information & Permit Office Minnesota Highway Patrol East Minnesota Highway Patrol west MEDIA ^ar Tribune. Editor Sun Newspapers, Editor Post Publishing, Editor MUNICIPALITIES RADIO STATION WCCC Orono and Long Lake Manager, 01r. of Public works Fire Chief, Police Chief METROPOLITAN TRAFFIC CONTROL AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION SCHOOL OIST 276 - ORONO Ken Mohr. Oomestic Travel Superintendent Transportation 01 rector TRANSIT MTC Transit Operating Division Oick Loeffler, Mgr., St. Operations HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal oppoilunity cmptoyer WHERE THE WEST BEGINS > r ?j August 13,1992 AUS 1 8 SS52 Nr. Joel Settles, Manager Hennepin Conservation District 12450 Wayzata B.lvd. Suite 205 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Dear Mr. Settles: On behalf of Long Lake, attached is the Grant Application to the Hennepin Conservation District to fight Eurasian Water Milfoil in Long Lake. This Grant Application is being submitted by the City of Long Lake, witl) full cooperation from the City of Orono, as joint benefactors in the resource of the Lake. We are very concerned about the recent infestation of Eurasian Milfoil in our Lake, and are very appreciative of the grant opportunity the Hennepin Conservation Dir^trict offers to help with this problem. After surveying the Lake, we where quite surprised to discover the extent of the recent infestation. The Lake map included with this application indicates the areas where Eurasian Milfoil is currently present. The greatest concentrations of the Eurasian Milfoil are in areas of the Lake associated with launching and docking of boats. This is consi.sLent with how we understand the Milfoil is introduced into lakes. It IS estimated that a treatment area of 17.5 acres of Long Lake will be necessary in order to cover the areas infested. As shown in the application, and reflected on the "Project Cost Budget", an initial treatment for the entire affected area is planned for this fall, with follow-up "spot" treatments as needed ne.xt summer. The attached "Project Funding Budget" indicates the 50% initial treatment financial participation expected from the D.N.R.. The D.N.R. has also offered to locate an application contractor and provide the guidance for the treatments. CITY HALL: 1964 PARK AVENUE • LONG LAKE, MINNESOTA 55356 • PHONE: (612)473-6961 i t. r' ■I; ■r i • ih. Page 2 Long Lake is a wonderful resource enjoyed by thousands throughout Hennepin County. Hopefully, with the help of the Hennepin Conservation District, we can act swiftly and effectively to control and perhaps eradicate Eurasian Water Milfoil from Long Lake. We appreciate your serious consideration of this Grant Application. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely,V 1. V X j / David R. Sawyer CounciImember City of Long Lake cc:l^g Lake Council •^ono Council Tom Sacks, D.N.R. Long Lake Park Board Marv Wurzer, LL public works Richard Manley, Lake resident Liz Olson, LL Planning Comm. Carol Brick]ey. Lake resident ■•-ti I •i -i •i GRANT APPLICATION FOR EURASIAN WATER MILFOIL CONTROL Water Body: LONG LAKE AppJleant's Name: CITY OF LONG LAKE Phone: 473 - 6961 Contact Person: Phone: DAVID SAWYER > COUNCILMEMBER 520 - 9746 Address: 1964 PARK AVENUE LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Estimate of Acreage Infested: 17.5 ACRES Proposed Activity: THE INFESTATION_OF EURASIAN. MILFOIL IN.LONG LAILB WILL_BB_ _ _ _ TREATED WITH *'2-4-D”. THE INITIAL APPLICATION WILL.TAKB_PLACB DURING SEPTEMBER - OCTOBER OF.THIS YEAR, WITH AboiTIONAL_ _ _ APPLICATIONS AS NEEDED NEXT SPRING. APPLICATION WILL BE DONE BY A CONTRACTOR SELECTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, AND .UNDER.THEIR.piRRCTIONi IT IS HOPED THAT PROMPT ATTENTION.TO THIS INITIAL INFESTATION OF EURASIAN MILFOIL WILL INCREASE THE LIKELIHOOD OF COMPLETE. CONTROL AND POSSIBLE ERADICATION FROM THE LAKE. Project Cost: $5,300.00 (SEE PROJECT COST BUDGET - ATTACHED) Amount Requested: $2,650.00 I*'* -»j- i *. ..'V . . -sy -■ ■1 Does the waterbody have a public access? Yes . X_ _ No_. Description of Activity: INITIAL ARBAS_OF„INFESTATION JiAVB BEEN IDENTIFIED ANDJCMtEBU ON.THE LAKE, _ _ _ _(SEE.ATTACHED MAP) _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ THE TREATMENT CHEMICAL **2-4-D" WILL BE APPLIED BY A LICENSED. CONTRACTOR UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE D.N.R. DURING SEPTEMBER OR OCTOBER OF THIS YEAR. _ _ _ SUCCESS OF THE INITIAL TREATMENT WILL BE EVALUATED DURING THE SPRING AND SUMMER OF NEXT YEAR AND FURTHER TRBATMENTS„WIL~L 9J DETERMINED. _ _ _ __ _ _ _ Persons/Vender Performing Work: PROFESSIONAL CONTRACTOR, TO BE DETERMINED. Cooperating Agencies and Co*^^ributing Sponsors Name Tjype_of Contri.butj.pjiL CITIES OF LONG LAKE A ORONO $ DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES $ $ Amoy.nt. HENNEPIN CONSERVATION DISTRICT $800.00 1,BSC.00 2,650.00 TOTAL $5,300.00 (SEE "PROJECT FUNDING BUDGET) rrrr^ss sarsararsras: Signature of Applic^t S'Mj-Z. f Date C:\WP5i\LLAPLIC k'ihnBn 4 :■ ••V •.* ‘l %t *<4? f -i;/' V V '■ • •*s: ' V.; :* -t.:^ j-, , •■ r-/ DflHfe£Sl$wJ»<' X.rV^w ^‘Ah..«W.VV •• ^ •-*.. . y _ |ivP/fftT/0-V Of EM/e'^^S'/rtA/ AULFO’il fOuffP C’s/l^l‘IX) PROJECT COST BUDGET Application Matarial "2-4-D" (1150.00 X 17.5 acres) Application Labor (150.00 X 17.5 acres) D.N.R. Permit SPRING TREATMENT Application Material "2-4-D" ($150.00 X 8 acres) Application Labor ($50.00 X 8 acres) TOTAL PROJECT COST APPUCATION FOR MIMTIC NUISANCE CQNTROI. KtHiT ■ Of appnaaaa iFiraa. H.I., Last) (iMar ar iWt) City of Long Lake lin aooraia (». a SSraaS, no, %m ta.. city. Stata. He Cadi) 1964 Park Avenue, Long Lake, NN 55356 C ) ns or MIISAIICC(S) Md FCC(S)| (Mfk all ivpItcabU kox«t)(FCI NIST ACCWNAUT VOM imiCHriai) taN *r asr* %9wn irt Mriitd, Mljr tN IvgMt Fm tlun apply (mjiInm tn Is S200.00) ■f SON CASH. IWt« ClMCk Pr Nonpp Ordtr payaPip toi RUlisOfA PCPWIINOIT OT M1HML A. NfCNANICAL COHTROLi Q Suhaarpad VpftUUpa Q baarfant Vapaeatlpp Q Flpatlpg Sop Tha RE It Sn.00 far tiM first mtp plot St.OQ for aacli addttloiMl aero. R. CfCNICAL CORlMLi Q SMbaypad fapaUtlPP Q Caerpaat VapttatlOA Tha RE ft H0.0t plat t.4t par thartllaa faat af tka propotad traataent araa. C. Q Ff laawitaaa Alpaa QOiara Qtaadwt Q Saaflt (talaaar't Ueli) Tha RE ft tS.W par 100 shorallat faat ar partlaa thoraaf propotad to ha traatad. 0. Q Plaoktaa Alpaa - Tha RE It $20.00 plat $.d0 par Kra proposed' to ba traatad. Eaa/Uta Caaaly IlMfl Long Lake Hennepin Long L) ^ OF AREA TO K faat atanp shore by foot lakoaard out to the depth of res (See attached map) faat. A chamal _____feet _ In iHdth aataadlnp to opaa eatar. p ahala laka ar hay ft af_ _ _acres la araa (Pfaaktoa Alpaa Only) laaFlN Naaa yoe aaar appll>«d for a ponalt ta treat at this lacatloaT Q No Q Yes - If ansaar ft *Vat*, Includa tha fallaMlPfi RilMT lUHieAi_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ YEM PCAMlf iSSlICOt_ _ _ _ _ _ la araa ta ha traatad eted for drlnhlnp water ar pwhile water supply? [29 Ra Q Yet - If Yat» tea Inttrectlont. Mn will aecaapllth tha work or traalaaaif Q Apptteaat Q Coaoerctal Applicator Determined by O.N.R aa»iii lao. a htm*. aro, im ao., cit|, irsie. ita <#*) Eurasian Water Milfoil tmifte CMakallt) M ta II (If I «i ttatch tha propotad traataent area on the back of tkit application. Indicatoi tho coapata diroctloa *Nortk* on Iha tkatch. locatlaa aa laka, whick skora, point, kay» ate., dlatnalont of propotad traataent area wttk aaoet and aatal fraatapaa af aack praparty awnar. INCLUOf TNC FlU HUNKN, SOHC N0TEMMT1IY lANOMAAiC. AM CMUGH DETAIL ON 1M SKETCH SOOTHE PMPEAY CM K LOCATED FOR FOSSISLC INSPECTION. iftFICATIOWi (Explalo why this prajact It naadad) To control the presence of Eurasian Milfoil in Long Lake. iUBURESi 03 Skatch/Nap Q SloneUirat QChack or Hoaty Ordar for Fee Q Other lorohy aako application for • poralt to destroy or control aauatlc nuisance at dascribad above. I endoratand that ro1 of oawotfc nultoncta, Includlno doatnictlon of water planta and altao. Is subject to nilot and roaulatlont of tstlooor of Notural Nasourcos. 1 understand that an annual report will bo roRulrod on all work dene and tka Khlovod. ^ amii f THIS APPLICATION IS KING WOE FOR TNt TRCA1MERT OF AR ERTIRE LAKI^OR BAY, AR OFFICER OF THE LAKE INFROVCNENr M OR OTHER OFFICIAL REPRESENTIM THE SHORELIK PKOFEKTY HOLDERS HOST SIGN. WHERE THIS APFLICATKM IS KING NM)C NDIT OF A CONTINUOUS AREA ADJACENT TO THE SIIORaiK PROFERTT OF HORE THAN ONE INOIVIOUAL, ALL THE FCISONS HOLDING ARJACENT TO THE HATtt AREA TO K TRCAnO NUST SIGN. SIONATUHES OF FROPERfy OMERS AM THE OINENSIOHS OF THE M TREATED lY EACH NAY IE SUBNlTfED OR AN ADDITIONAL SHEET OP FAFER. •mm mm f?w»*. CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3150 _________ APPROVING A JOINT EURASIAN HATER HILFOIL GRANT APPLICATION WITH THE CITT OF LONG LAKE IfHEREASt Eurasian Water Milfoil has now been identified in Long Lake, and WHEREAS, it is important that control efforts be initiated as soon as possible to stop the Milfoil from spreading and to possibly eradicate it, and WHEREAS, the Hennepin Conservation District has a grant program for Eurasian Water Milfoil control efforts, and WHEREAS, because Long Lake is located within the Cities of Orono and Long Lake both cities have a strong interest in preserving the quality of the lake. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Orono City Council does hereby approve the joint submission of a grant application to the Hennepin Conservation District to control Eurasian Water Milfoil on Long Lake. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono at their regular meeting on the 10th day of August, 1992. ATTfiBT;Barbara A. Peterson,' Mayor 8 *1 1 i RICHARD J. MANLEY & ASSOCIATES, INC. HANUFACTURCRS RCPRCSCNTATIVCS 1788 MARTHA LANE • LONG LAKE. MINNESOTA 55356 OFC. C6121 475-1227 • ANS. SERV.MMMM«<8» ps: /^iLrotu i KJ P?.^TAT^o^:i ____€L^in—• Lfvjiisi6“ / lor7^ciD«»^"^ UlvjItOA (to I-C*J6- LftF£. 0.) Wt bSS-O Tits- ^V'£/,XF-TT£-PS oF OF CHAKiC.t k«<r. ^Zy j: -16 10^ Mt 1-1=0 li- oti ^ oF VcvOSrV/f-P, fimoTH TO TitlS ac^v/V /vm-Ft-lL ^t,»6HBORS 0^t 'TO-lb ^ S(pe8.D Trtt ^ ,.>TU /V^Ti , (F)oe ACT"J" 1:L.t p«-o »;^'^'*^: °, .0 ^ a<>siSt/\ajc£3 F ' _ „ juiaiL-AJ?2-C K 9,5 /WADS TM/^ " •i » I DISTRICTSAHA MATERSHE AGERDA >LA1VT TIOLATIORS OOMIITTEE August 20« 1992 Wayzats City Hall City Council Chambers 5:30 p.m. Fsbruary 1992 Applicant: Location: Purpose: to- 92.06: J.R. Wagner 2030 Shorewooo Lane City*of*Moun”*Sec. 18CA, west Arm, LaKe Minnetonka Installation o£ 150 lineal feet of rip rap shoreline erosion protection February 1992permit AoDlicatiop Itei Applicant: William Standke415 Lakeview Ave. Clt5*o£*Tink!! B“”sec. 27CA, OldMn* 8«y, L,k« Minnetonka .Installation of 120 lineal feet of rip rap shoreline erosion protection. Location: Purpose: p»r«tt Apnlieation^lto^l^TM February 1992 Location: Purpose: 2665 Casco Point Rd. City*of Orono^ Sec. 20BC, Spring Park Bay, Lake Installation of 180 lineal feet of rip rap shoreline erosion protection Ah Aopllcation MO February 1992 Applicant: Location: Purpose: Irene Stands 2659 Casco Point Rd. «ty*of'otono!*s«c. 20BC, Sptlns park Bay. Lake Installation of 1«0 lineal feet of rip tap shoreline erosion protection Libbs Lake January 1989 s i t ' ■K j iL August 1990Pftpwit: Aoplicaty on Wo. 89-06; Applicant: Ben and Judy Simmons 2558 Crosby Road Wayzata, MN 55391 City of Minnetonka, Sec. 8DA, Grays Bay, Lake Minnetonka . , <Dredging to remove 630 cubic yards of material from a channel to improve navigational access. Location: Purpose: December 1989Pwrfit Application Wo. 89-208; Applicant: Thomas McMorrow 2807 McKenzie Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 City of Minnetonka, Sec. 8CC, Wayzata Bay, Lake Minnetonka•After-the-fact* permit for construction of a wood retaining wall and placement of fill in the Lake Minnetonka floodplain. Location: Purpose: Applican?r^"^**^Minneapol and Recreation Boa.-d Location: Purpose: February 1992 ; Parmit Application Ho. 92-23.:November 1991y-J /\/ Applicant: Location: Purpose: Jeff Danbury 3545 Ivy Place Wayzata, MN 55391 City of Orono, Sec. 20DB, Carman Bay, Lake Minnetonka .•j^fter-the-fact" installation of rxp rap shoreline erosion protection. Permit Application HQi _ Applicant: Mr. Joel Dtesel February 1992 Location: Purpose: City of Shorewood 5735 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 City of Shorewood, Sec. 33AA Stormwater management plan for a public , facility located north of County Rd. 19 and east of Shorewood Lane, "after-the-fact . -2- 4 4 March 1991p>niiit ADOlication Wo. 91~lAi Applicant: Lawrence R. Paste 3896 Sunset Drive Spring Park, MN 55384 City of Spring park. Sec., West Arm, Lake Minnetonka Installation of approximately 80 lineal feet of rip rap shoreline erosion protection and a beach sand blanket “after-the-facf. Location: Purpose: Ned Podany, Mound July 1990 Roger Frommelt, Orono October 1990 April 1991Porait Application Wo. 91-77: Applicant: Michael Gilbertson 4350 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 City of Mound, Sec. 19AC, Black Lake, Lake Minnetonka “After-the-fact* floodplain alteration and installation of an upspecified amount of rip rap shoreline erosion protection. Location Purpose: Sandra Vroroan, Plymouth August 1991 July 1991Pitwlt Applleation Me. 89-174: Applicant: City of Tonka Bay 4901 Manitou Road Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Location: City of Tonka Bay, Sec. 28DC Purpose: Stormwater management plan for grading' of Manitou Park. Jack Cook, Mound August 1991 T.L. Kellogg, Greenwood March 1992 Carole Munsen, Mound November 1991 Keith Wilcox, Greenwood March 1992 -3- '/ A .■j- A A h NUttutatiMiiu Ponait Aopiication Wo- §0-151;September 1992 Applicant: Location: Purpose: Metro Waste Control Commission 230 E. Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 City of Wayzata, Sec. 5CC, intersection of Highway 100 and County Rd. 16 Installation of approximately 1,200 lineal feet of sanitary sewer and a metering vault. Permit Application Ho. 91-88:June 1991 Applicant: Location: Purpose: Terry Zurn 3035 Lakeohore Blvd. Wayzata, MN 55391 City of Wayzata, Sec. 17AB, Libbs Lake, Lake Minnetonka Installation of 3b lineal feet of rip rap shoreline erosion protection "after-the-fact". June 1992Permit Application Wo. 92-107; Applicant: Michael Pyzdrowski 3916 Merriam Ave. Minnetonka, MN 55343 City of Minnetonka, Sec. 23BB, northwest of the intersection of Merriam Ave. and Myrtle Court Stormwater management plan for an 8-lot family residential subdivision called "Heritage Oaks 2nd Location: Purpose: Addition". Gayles Marina y 47LNS -4- i ".1 : -r L 3. 4. 5. » 1-4 IAHA NATERSHED DISTRICT HQfjpp OF NRIAGERS !• Thursday« August 20, 1992 Naysata City Hall City Council Chanbra 7:00 p.n. X. ordar: nott irtondtacR- 2. fonraval ftf Soanda HX'A approYfl^ minutCS Of 1992. p»ihite Htf**^"** Q° GlRaapa CiRth..li Ummrina Of AppIICatiOnR. A.Applicant: Location: Purpose: Hennepin County 320 Mashington Ave. S. Hopkins, W S5343 r,e,..t^on of CSAH 146 fro® Orchard Lane to 0.8. Hig y 12. B.Applicant: Location: Purpose: _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Mrth Suburban Oevelopnent Conpany p, 0. Bo* 34004 City of Shorewod, ii-iot SiSSu'fUilJ^JSSdSntiarsubdiirisU call«l s!thto-» «o.d. c. V.' 2548 Casco Point Road 20BC, C.r«.» ..r. «.•<«. improvement portion of Permit 9 Location: Purpose: D.’ ll'illsiijiir' Chanha*J««* I® olan for iraprovamantt Purpoaa: MCWD Permit Mo. 91-lU. 6365 Bayrldgo Road T117, RJ4. 8«:tlo« It. 1/4 Sac. S.^-_ _ _ _^ invoWlng inatallatlon o5"w ‘tS;iiS.iy JOO ■Hnr*iina aroaloB protaction and t»a conatnictioB of a concrata launch ramp. Location: purpose: f [F.Kp^u."nf^^aU"5e'sta-s=“; 1335 Brown Road S. Orono* MR 55323 wt%rmm¥^ Lake.- LakaLoc.tion: City of Otooo, S^c. 7», rot..t L.M. i. MinAtttonKS Alan for rocoostnictlOB p„,pe..: ~?itln, e»i..rt »«a.r Park oriva. G.Applicant: Location: Purpose: City of liiimStoika 14600 Minnetonka Bljd. Minnetonka« !■ oekrldoa Road City of St joSS D?l.o. l?rr^trr*SSS,*oi:«t PX« « °.u;’;s'?u;iJtii“ioi “ i,«oo u~.x *-» of roadway. Applicant: Location: Purpose: W!ilht-"i.iFlo co-op Bloc. Boa 330 Birch Ava. S. Maple Lake, MR jWoa willowCity of Madina, Sac. 22BC, weai; w*. Drive and south of Highway 24 Installation of *" “J^JJ^J^JlStland and Crosby distribution Una across a weri«i« Creek. -2- L'w X. J. M. a,.„. Plymouth* I® managemont plan for construction 5f i^lassroom building at Christ Memorial Lutheran Church. Location: purpose: Applicant: Adath Yeshurum Cemetery5S0S France Avenue South ^Jy*if"ldlna, T2S# S24, Section 20# 1/4 Sec. Plo^plaln alteration Involving Installation of grave sites. Location: Purpose: fmrmit. Apalieatinn lO. f2"12S* Applicant: s. “t;*if"Sdinl“M*. M4. 8«!tio« 20. 1/4 •«:. Shoreline Improvement Involving installstlom of IS^llneal^feet of rip rap for shoreline erosion protection. Location: Purpose: !KSUJf"8 !^J4 H’—‘ ”• *23, 8«:tlon 32, Mot2Si.r-.».o-*ntand parking lot expansion at llinneeashta Elementary School. Location: Purpose: Applicant: Location: Purpose: tichard Hagen 6SS0 Smlthtown toad Excelsior# MS 55331 S5;.!!B^S~V.K!Sr.!T ”‘ *' existing rip rap. -3- 60S5 w«st Branch Roja 1/4 S«c. ^ _ involvlna restoration of purpose: JJJJilJld by constructing sn earthen dike across a drainage ditch. Location: o.EftflApplicant: P. Q. Location: R. Purpose: wade Holasek 1060 Mlgheay 5 tlMB, M«". Stctioi 8, 1/4 in»ol»ln8 th« d»»«lop«nt o* t»o 3.S iet« lots on an 80 acre site. Applicant: Location: Purpose: Ray 0. Johnson 4805 E. Sunnyslope Rfl. Edina, MR 55424 o£ an aluflilnum retaining wall. Applicant: Location: Purpose: 18, 1/8 4t»fcoWlno construction of a IS HSUS .l5. It <•. 37th Str-t. Applicant: Location: purpose Sec. RM _^ «i*n for a coaewrclslHirriu -4- i ■vV'ii 1 i i J i s.pf n Applicant: Location: purposa: T. O. Kb .lU ■iucS^.oy K5?S« “p ff •!»“« crook* B.y, L.k. Minnetonka . pi^natt App^ic- __ Applicant: Jack xnomaa Location: Purpose: shoreline erosion protection. Applicant: Location: Purpose: Terry Minxler 6498 Smithtown Joad |!“';f“beS.ior!”roporty I.O. •«*-«500.0, Lots 7 and • invoivine installation•r:S!SiSS!ns Sis* •« “•Shoreline erosion protection. Harold Okinoi# 6500 Snithtoim load Victoria# Ml t n. #65-5650070,City of Victoria, Property i.o* * shoreline erosion protection. Applicant: Location: Purpose: Location: Purpose: 1911 Beach i..ch, Pto,«ty i.o. #1511723230009 involving installations°uiSiasr;rs.U”; r •• ■"Shoreline erosion protection. -5- X. Y. X. AA. BB. fmrrnit APl^l 92-I52- Applicant: Paul BllAa 4384 Tonka Bay# •* •.« t nLocation: City of Tonka Bay. Property I.D. §2X11723420032 shornllnn Iraprovaraant installation of approxliaatnly 115 llnoal foot of rip rap shorollRO orosion protoctlon. purposo: Tonka Bay# HB 55331 , ^ Location: City of Tonka Bay, Proporty I.D. • 2111723130009 , ^ ^ ^ #.iShorollno Imptovonont InvoUrlnq Installation of approslawtoly 150 linoal foot of rip rap for shorollno protoctlon. Purposo: permit aanliesfinn P**- Applicnt: SlSrorJJJJSo””*TU7, MJ. S.etlo« IJ. Stoimatar aaaagMMnt pl»» f®*,***^^*“*ijl sanitary sooor and wator «aln ioproooaonti for Forost Lano. Location: Purposo: Applicant: M. *. Oononny5017 Avon Drlvo «2<. S«!tlOB 24. 1/4 stotaUM lmpto»«.*Bt ln»ol»^g iS'Mp'rw”" of approxlmatoly 50 linoal foot of rip rap for shorollno orosion protoctlon. Location: Purposo: 310 4th Avonuo South ?ir;riuA.lSo!r.“T28, «24, S«:tlon 12, Floodplain altoratlon Involvingconstruction of Irrlgatlon/storisoa^r/golf water hasard ponds# oarthbunkors.and an irrigation pump house. Location: purposo: -6- i cc. Clty*oC^liin»«toSi!*s2c. 8CC, Grayt Bay, Xniitali«tion o£ gabiont, along tjjo north abutaont of Gray*! Bay Cauaaway Brldga for aroaion protaction. Location: purpoaa: 5. roHimlttaa BaoQlt. g. vialatlnni rninmltttt itMI^ 7. Baport. A. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. B. Prftnoaad for 1991. plan* an fl Program* gomittaa ROPOtt Pqlieiaa i*^taa Baoort »nainaar*« Bapott. nanort. nn#4ni«had Buaint8A nuainaaa 9170AJ(77) ;t m ■rijli-........ . K-.w '*KV'rr*L.;Ari:ltl ;■ --------------- 1 h ■ : • ‘i- MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF July 16, 1992 MINNEHAHA CREEK MATERSHED DISTRICT board of managers The reaular meeting of the Board of Managers of the Minnehaha City Hall, St. Louis Park, Minnesota. Managers present: Spensley, Thomas, LaBounty, Lindley, Love and Erickson. Managers absent: Maple. Also present were Board Advisors Panser, Syverson, Quanbeck and Jones. Approval of Agenda It was moved by Manager ®f®°J?^Qrder*as^provided byS4k:-s.“.5S.“:s-ti!. unanimously. Approval ol The Managers reviewed the minutes of the meeting of !J;rSSiel^r«i;.S«"?nS!l5*iSat the minute. be approved as amended by Manager Spensley. '^'“.^^^°2rtied iecSSSn by Manager LaBounty. Upon vote, the motion carried unanimously. annrnval pf Permit APPliC«tlOI« It was moved by Manager LaBounty, seconded by "•"•9?' rhr^‘g?Slii'?Srthr.S??f2:?tons met all applicable district rules: 09,7fi. crown College; Fia^ BeddDIi V PngLrl^der; and 9?-n ‘7. PiiYShore Manfl£ rondominium AssociatiOfls. Upon vote, the motion carried unanimously. bV , J i-W. .TrNa«ir%‘, - .r b.■ I k Am m .Jt Tablina of Perait Apnlications It was moved by Manager Erickson, seconded by Manager Love, to table permit numbers 92-132. City of Spring Path* Minnetonka Public School District 276 based on recommendation of the Engineer that the applications were incomplete. Upon vote the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Quanbeck reviewed the status of all permit applications which had previously been approved by the Board of Managers pending receipt by the Engineer of necessary items outlined in the Engineer's report. Mr. Quanbeck stated that letters had been sent to all such applicants notifying them that outstanding items be received by no later than July 15, 1992. While a substantial number of applicants complied with this deadline, some appli^nts failed to do so. It was moved by Manager Love and seconded by Manager Thomas that all such applications should be tabled with any exhibits to be forwarded to wenck Associates, Inc. and the completed applications to be brought before che Board of Managers for final approval. Upon vote, the motion carried unanimously. The permit applications tabled pursuant to this motion are as follows: Permit Application No. 91-018: Robert Palmer; Application No, 91-095: Dr. Harry A. Johnson, Jr.; Application No, 91-096, Dr. Anthony Faras; Application No. 91-110, Roslyn Henderson; Application No. 91-113, Holy Name Catholic Church; Application No. 91-017, Carlson Real Estate Company, Inc.; Application No. 91-128, City of Chanhassen; Application No. 92-026, City of Long Application Ho. 92-049, Lowell Zitzloff; Application No. 92-052, City of Ornow; Application No. 92-059, Mark and Claudia Cohn; Application No. 92-073, Temple Israel; and Application No. 92-100, Christ Memorial Lutheran Church. of Permit Applications Q2-92. Citw of Deenhaven — Storm water management Plan and nhorewater improvement for reconstruction of CitY*8 Min beaCh aiegjL The Engineer reported that this project involves ^ reconstruction of a public beach in the City of Deephaven and that the application was essentially complete except for an exhibit concerning a revised cross section. It was moved by Manager Love and seconded by Manager Lindley that the application be approved with the permit to be issued upon receipt of those items set forth ird UinwtM -2-<07/1C/92) r in the Engineer’s report in a form and substance acceptable to the Engineer. Upon vote the motion carried unanimously. feet 92-gs. and Joan Perry — installation of.-18? line.a.1 of rio ran shoreline protection. St. Loula BaY« LaKfi ^ nt><>^nnk«. City of Deephaven. The Engineer reported that this project involving placing of rip rap shoreline erosion protection materials was recommended for approval and noted two items which remained to be received. It was Bioved by Manager Love and seconded by Manager Thomas that the application be approved based upon the Engineer recommendation with the permit to be issued upon receipt of those ite^ set forth in the Engineer’s report in a form and substance acceptable to the Engineer. Upon vote the motion carried unanimously. ^2-QO, Frank Wn» — Inetallation of 165 linaal feet of riP mn «hor«>Hne protection. Lake Minnetonka. CitY Qt It was moved by Manager Love and seconded by Manager Thomas that the permit be approved based upon recommendation of the Engineer. Upon vote the motion carried unanimously. o.-n. Buhen P.U. — shorelina impreTeaent. UyoXyIm of SO lineal feet of rip raP Shoreline fllQglQn protef?tion. Citr of Minnetonka Beach. The Engineer recommended approval of this application of the installation of rip rap noting that certain matters still need to be provided by the applicant. It was moved by Manager Love, seconded by Manager LaBounty, that the permit be approved based on the recoimiindation of the Engineer with . receipt of those items set forth in the Engineer s in a form and substance acceptable to the Engineer. Upon vote the motion carried unanimously. yfcoMjin Fischer and Joanne Sullivan — Installation.Ql. approximately 280 lineal feet Of IIP gflP ghOIdling glOaiQII protection. City of Excelsior. It was moved by Manager Love and seconded by Manager ^«Bounty to approve the permit based upon recommendation of the Engineer with^issuance pending receipt by the Engineer of the items forth in the Engineer’s report in a form and substance acceptable to the Engineer. Upon vote the motion carried unanimously. UCXD loard Mimitas -3-(07/16/92) Hoaea — Installation of 80 lineal feet-fli rin ran for ghorelino erosion protection. CitY of ExcelSIflt^ It was moved by Manager Love and seconded by Manager LaBounty that the permit be approved, based upon the Engineer recommendation, with issuance pending receipt by the Engineer of those items set forth in the Engineer’s report in a form and substance acceptable to the Engineer. Upon vote the motion carried unanimously. e2.ii5. Paragon Peaiqnera aod Bttlldftga.Plan for a lot subdivision located in the CitT-fll Mtnnetonke^ The Engineer reported that all exhibits have been received unanimously. Deer Run Meighbor Tne. — Storm waterg2-.118. - - - - - - - - - —.—-— Victoria^ Manager Lindley announced that he had an indirect financial interest in this matter and that he would take no part in the deliberations concerning this permit application and votina to avoid any question of a conflict of interest. the recoraaendation of the Engineer that the matter tabled since the City of Victoria has not reviewed and approved P}*"*. .. Craig Schmidt of Engelhardt Engineering appeared on behalf of the applicant and indicated that the project had been appwved by the City's Planning Commission and would have been approved by the City Council but for a lack of a quorum at the last meeting. It was moved by Manager Love and seconded by Manager LaBounty that the matter be tabled based upon recommendation of the Engineer. Upon vote the motion carried unanimously with Manager Lindley abstaining. 02.121. Hans Homes — Stora.M«tflr ■BBigawnt PlaO-gflt rtftvftlQpment for apprnvimatelv 24 acres for rwnidenMai iot« in the Seven Ponds Second Addition* CitY at Plymouth. The Engineer indicated that the application meets applicable District rules and the only exhibit co be provided is documentation of the City of Plymouth’s review and approval of the Board Uinutw -4-(fl7/1C/a2) proiect. It was moved by Manager Love and seconded by Manager LaBounty that the permit be approved and issued upon receipt by the Engineer of documentation of project review and approval by the City of Plymouth. Upon vote* the project carried unanimously. Q2-127. Mariorv Davis and Martha Johnson — 5MB ChQMCtt Avenue Snii«-h. Edina. MM. shoreline inetallation of 93 lineal rip ran for shoreline protection along Minnehaha CrefilU The Engineer recommended approval pending receipt of those items set forth in the Engineer's report. It was moved by Manager Love, seconded by Manager Thomas that the permit be approved with issuance pending receipt of those items as set forth in the Engineer's report in a form and substance acceptable to the Engineer. Manager LaBounty expressed his concern applications which have not been signed. He also questioned the Engineer concerning the construction of the would require a variance from normal slope requirements. Manager LaBounty stated that there appeared to be a lack . for this project to date. Manager Erickson also indicated that he was very concerned about the slope of the project and expressed a need to review the matter in more detail at the next meeting. Based upon these comments* Manager Love withdrew his motion, it was moved by Manager LaBounty and seconded by Manager Erickson that permit applications No. 92-127 «.nd 92-128 (Peter Randall* 5612 Chowen Avenue South* Edina* installation of 95 J®®^ ® rip rap for shoreline erosion protection) be tabled. Upon vote the motion carried* with Manager Thomas voting against the motion. Q2-ns. Thompson Land Development — LtOTB MaMqfiBent plan frir oradina for Phase 3 of the BridalMQOfl f«P ritv of Plymouth. I Addition seconded by Manager Love that the permit be recommendation of the Engineer. Upon vote* the motion carried unanimously. 09-190. Thn Marsh — stom water managcragnt plan for building iA"%"S.nsinn forthe Mamli Fitneffff Centat. CUg-Stt Minnetonka. ird UinutM -5-(07/1S/92> .L- finds to be in compliance with applicable District rules. However, the Engineer has not received notification from the City of Minnetonka Engineering Department that it has approved the final grading and drainage plans. Mr. Panzer indicated that these plans have been provided to the City and that he believes they will be acceptable to the City. It was moved by Manager Erickson and seconded by Manager Lindley that the permit be approved with issuance pending notice from the City of Minnetonka that it has reviewed and approved the final grading and drainage plans. Upon vote, the motion carried unanimously. Minnetonka Public School District 276 — Storm water nian for an addition and parking lot expansion at CrQvelfw«i g1«w^ntanr School. Citv of Mlnnatonka and Permit anpUcaMon Mo. 92-13a« Minnetonka Public School Distx Ct 27£..-j=l storm water management plan for an addition and parking iQt oToanaion at Deeohaven glementar* Schools City Of DeePhflgaiU. The Engineer indicated that both of these projects border on the Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District with a significant amount of the discharge from the projects draining intu that watershed. As such, it is the Engineer's recommendation that the Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District perform the lead role in the review of these applications. It was moved by Manager Lindley and seconded by Manager LaBounty that the applications be approved based upon the Engineer recommendation, pending notification that the application had received necessary approvals from tne respective Cities and the Riley Purgatory Creek Watp»-shed District. Upon vote, the motion carried unanimously. Q2-129. Gregory j. Liemandt — inatallation Qt 13Q lineal feet of rip ran for shoreline erosion protection. Lake MlPnetQIlMa. City of Tonka Bar. The Engineer recommended approval of the permits since the application complied with all applicable District rules. Upon vote, the motion carried unanimously. Q2-038. I. & M Properties — Storm water manaaaaent Plan foi an eleven lot sinole-family residential subdivision called_ Bonlder Ridae Estates* in the City of Sherwood,. The Engineer reported that this application was tabled at the June meeting. A site inspection was undertaken by several managers and Mr. Panzer. The DNR is only concerned with protected wetlands and issues of jurisdictional wetlands under the Wetlands Conservation Act are referred to the responsible governmental unit — in this case, the District. A discussion ensued with the developer's representative, Jim Harper, concerning alternatives to UOm Board Uinutaa -6-(07/16/92) the proposed driveway and other measures to mitigate the impact of the project on existing wet lands. The Engineer noted that there are several unique aspects of the project and recommended approval of the project as set forth in the attached resolution. The resolution was moved by Manager Lindley and seconded by Manager Thomas. Upon vote, the motion carried with Manager Love voting against the resolution. (Louis Smith to provide resolution). •Jit l‘v- Q2~101. John R. Johnson — Storm water nanaq rrrial development located in St, Louis Park. nt Plan for a The Engineer reported that this application had been tabled at the June meeting of the Board of Managers. Upon review of the application, the Engineer recommended its approval rending the receipt of a detailed erosion control plan. Such a plan *rould be written into the permit. Further, an additional permit would be necessary for the development of Parcel A of this development. It was moved by Manager Lindley and seconded by Manager Love that the application be approved based on the Engineer recommendation, and the permit be issued upon receipt of those items set forth in the Engineer's report. Upon vote, the motion passed unanimously. 92-1 >. The Rottlund Company. Inc. — Storm water manaqgmsnt Plan for a 56 unit multi-familv residential development tP bd nailed ■Anhiimnwood Villas*. City of Minnetonka. The Engineer reported that an issue exists concerning determination of the flood plain elevation of this site. This determination is important since the flood storage level is cdlculdtBd b8S6d on tho ordinsry hlQh wdtior (OHW) Ridrk« Currently, the City of Minnetonka and the District have established different OHWs for the site. Paul Churney, of Pine Engineering, appeared in support of the application. indicated that adequate storage capacity exists even if the higher ordinary high water mark is used as a base for the calculations. Mr. Panzer indicated that all other issues have been satisfactorily answered assuming that the applicant can provide documentation concerning the adequacy of the storage capacity, it was moved by Manager Lindley and seconded by Manager Love that the permit be approved with issuance pending receipt by the Engineer of documentation concerning the adequacy of the storage capacity in a form and substance acceptable to the Engineer. Manager Spensley asked whether there would be any storm water roanageTOnt impact on other developed land in the area should the project be built. Mr. Churney indicated that this matter had been reviewed and no such impact would result. Upon vote, the motion carried unanimously. UCXD Board Uinutoa -7-(07/1fi/92) City of Soring Lake Park — Storw water management Plan for street improvements> It was moved by Manager Thomas and seconded by Manager Lindley that this permit application be removed from the table with a limit of three minutes for discussion. John CarwacKi of Shell Engineering appeared on behalf of the applicant. H® j indicated that the concerns raised by the Engineer will be handled by routing the runoff into a detention basin and then into the lake. Currently# the storm water runoff goes directly from the roadway into the lake. As a result# the change in design will significantly improve water quality. It was moved by Manager Lindley and seconded by Manager Thomas that the application be approved with issuance of the permit to be based upon receipt of revised plans in a form and substance acceptable to the Engineer which would route the storm water runoff into a detention basin before it drains into the lake. Upon vote# the matter carried unanimously. la. Inc. --92-1IS. Dftftr Bun Weial_ Plan for the extension of all municipal utilitiea^ QmdifHF K’ reet conatruetien for Deer Run Eighth Addition It was moved by Manager Thomas and seconded by Manager Lindley that the application be removed from the table with a limit of thi.ee minutes for discussion. Upon vote# the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Smith of Engelhardt Engineers appeared on behalf of the applicant and explained to the Managers that the remaining exhibit to be provided would not be a problem for the developer. He further explained that the Victoria City Council would meet prior to the next meeting of the Board of Managers. Since the matter had previously received approval of the City's Planning Commission# the applicant anticipated that there would be no problem receiving approval of the Victoria City Council. Manager Thomas moved approval of the permit with issuance of the permit to be based upon resc tion of outstanding issues as set forward in the Engineer's report to the satisfaction of the Engineer and based upon a’jproval by the City of Victoria. The motion was seconded by Ma lager Love. Manager Lindley indicated again that he has an indirect financial interest in this project and thus would not participate in the discussion or vote. Upon vote# the motion carried with Managers Thomas# Love and Erickson voting in the affirmati'»c and Managers Spensley and LaBounty voting in the negative. Rleason Creek Improvement Project It was moved by Manager Love and seconded by Manager Thomas that the agenda be suspended and that the Gleason Creek project UCSD Board yinutw -8-(07/1«/92> scheduled to be heard as a part of the Plans and Programs Committee Report be heard. Upon vote, the motion carried. Mr. Quanbeck provided an update on the status of the the Board of Soil and Water and Sewer Resources comment during the allotted time. Mr. Quan»'eck indicated that revisions had been made to the Engineer‘s report based on comments received from the City of Waysata and othe.-s. Manager Spensley indicated that the report of the Programs CoitMittee was incorporated It was moved by Manager Love and seconded by Manager Lindley^at the resolution has prepared be adopted. Manager , whether it was possible to go ahead with the downstream portion of the project without completing the Gleason Lake portion immediately under the terms of the asked whether this resolution would authorize the use of minent domain to acquire any necessary easements or other P'^P®^^^ interests without further authorization of the Board. f®?®* - indicated that this resolution was not a final ?®JJ®® ®J. on this project. A discussion on whether to establish JJj® P^®i®®^ is scheduled for the Board’s regular meeting on August 20th, following the public hearing. The acquisition of easements or other property interests would follow that decision. Managers LaBounty and Love emphasized the need to work ®^®*®^J affected property owners in hopes that any easement ^®J®^®^^®^® could be resolved through negotiations. Manager Spensley stated that it was the Committee’s intention to hold special informational meetings with the property owners meeting of the Board of Managers on this matter. “*"®J®^_®PJ®®*®^ further suggested that the August meeting be moved up ^® J’JJ J;"* and that the public hearing on the proposed project be the first item of business. The role was taken concerning the proposed resolution (which is attached to these Minutes). Managers Thomas, Bindley, LaBounty, Love, Erickjon and President Spensley all voted in fa o of the resolution which passed unanimously. Beach Association — Place 3 flood Plain alteration. Lake Hi iPt Qf letonka«y7-oa«». woodend hftach sap<3 blanket a ri»-v of Minnitrista. It was moved by Manager Love and seconded by Manager Lindley that the permit be approved based on recommendation of the EngLeer Si^h issuanSi to be based upon receipt of those items as HCSD Board UimitM -9-(07/1C/92) set forth in the staff report in a form and substance acceptable to the Engineer. Upon vote, the motion carried unani.iously. Cit-y of Wavzata — Placement of beach sand blankets . Lake Minnetonka. Citv of Wavxata. It was moved by Manager Love and seconded by Manager LaBounty that the application be approved with the permit to be issued based upon receipt of those items set forth in the Engineer's report with form and substance acceptable to the Engineer. Upon vote, motion carried unanimously. Q2-102. City of St. Louis Park — Storm water management Plan for conatraetion of storm sewer system; 2Bth Street at Flag Avenue The Engineer indicated that this matter had been tabled at the June meeting. Since that meeting, all items previously i^eqxiested had been received, but additional details are still necessary in regard to some exhibits. It was moved by Manager Thomas and seconded by Manager Love that the permit approved with issuance pending receipt by the Engineer of additional items as set forth in the Engineer's report in a form and substance acceptable to the Engineer. Upon vote, the motion carried unanimously. 92-119. City of Minnetonka — Wetland alteration involving oxnansion of storage capacity in Pond Wo. 17. City of Minnetonka. Upon review of additional information submitted by the applicant, the Engineer recommended approval of the permit based on the application's compliance with all applicable District rules. It was moved by Manager Lindley and seconded by Manager Love to approve the permit based on recommendation of the Engineer. Upon vote, the motion carried unanimously. a2-112. city of Minnafotika — Flood plain and wetland alteration for construction of 5.040 feet of public trails. The Engineer reported that upon review of additional information, it recommended approval of the permit since the application complied with all applicable District rules. It was moved by Manager Lindley and seconded by Manager Love to approve the permit b'^sed upon recommendations of the Engineer. Upon vote, the motion <^arried unanimously. <^2-13Q. iSdina Community Lutheran Church — Storm water manaoetflent plan for an addition to the church. City of Edina. The Engineer reported that the proposed plan would drain not UCSD Soartf Uinwti -10-(07/16/92) only the new area but also provide increased water quality through the drainage of the existing parking lot. It was moved by Manager Lindley and seconded by Manager Love that the permit be approved based upon recommendation of the Engineer with issuance pending receipt of those items set torth in the Engineer’s report * form and substance acceptable to the Engineer. Upon vote, the motion carried unanimously. ’)/ q^-o«4. Bill Knapp -- storm water ■anaqement PlaO-lgt A ” a th?S; lot atnoiS-faBiirre^ftn^ guMitifliflu ( tU “AiiAd ■cristofort woods Addition- ill the CitT aLitiaflU*. The Engineer reported that upon review of additional Information, the application compiles with all recomoends approval of the permit. It was moved by and seconded by Manager LaBounty that the permit^ !S?i«n®L«i2d upon the Engineer’s recommendation. Upon vote, the motion carried unanimously. Executive Committee Report President Spensley reported chat negotiations with the City of Minnetonka in regard to the joint powers agreement concerning office space are progressing and he hopes to finalise those negotiations before the August meeting of the Board. He further indicated that negotiations have been completed hiring of Ms. Ellen Klanderman to serve as acting District CootSinator and a letter o£ confirmation will be forthcoming to M. Ellen Klanderman shortly. President Spensley then reguested tS;t a ~tioS be passed approving the Ofjt Joint Power. Agrj^nt with the City of Minnetonka. It was moved by Manager Love ai^ seconded by Manager Lindley that the joint approved and that President Spensley be authorised JJ® related negotiations and to execute the Agreement. Upon vote, the motion carried unanimously. rnmolainty^ and Violations Committee RePfltt Manager Love reported that the Complaints and . . committee met prior to the Board of SichUlevening to review the status of Permit Application 92-107. Micnaei PyzdroSski. In 1987, a permit application was Vjj® project with issuance of the permit pending receipt items. The additional exhibits were never provided and as such, the permit was not issued. The applicant, nonetheless, developed s’x lots and now is seeking to develop additional lots. The applicant desires to correct past problems, as well as making sur yam loary UinutM -11-(07/16/92) that the project complies with District rules in the future. Mr. Panzer indicated that the application meets the overall plans of the City. The only question involves certain wetlands. The applicant volunteered to pay for any Engineer time related to a site visit to resolve the wetland i»sue. It was moved by Manager Lindley that the permit be issued subject to a site visit by the Engineer to ensure that all wetlands are correctly delu.^atM and subsequently recorded as a part of the deed and further subject to satisfying any unmet conditions of the 1987 permit. The motion was seconded by Manager LaBounty. Upon vote, the motion carried unanimously. Manager Love indicated that a meeting will be arranged between Mr. Quanbeck and Mr. Panzer concerning transition natters. In the neantine# Mr. Quanbeck will continue to try to close out as many of the violation matters as possible. The meeting was then adjourned to Executive session to discuss pending litigation matters. Finanfift rnnwiittee Report Mr. Lindley reported that the Hennepin County property tax srlSHrls Statements in order to properly allocate amounts among the District's accounts. iHllitliirmotion carried unanimously. Man,.yer Lindley noted that the District will be required to certify its property tax levy as a part of the August meeting and further noted that the Finance Committee will need to work on budget and related levy issues in advance of that meeting. Pnlcs and Policies Committee Repcrt Manager Thomas stated that the Committee had met on June 30th. At that time, the Committee discussed various approaches to a shoreline improvement licensure ordinance. One approach MOB Board Ulnutw -12-(07/16/92) discussed was a combined license that would cover dredging and shoreline improvements for those involved in both businesses. The Committee also discussed the development of an information sheet to be provided to applicants for District permits. The Committee is also recommending that a Public Hearing be noticed for the August meeting in regard to the proposed amendment to Rule B, a copy of which is attached to these Minutes. Knai fleer «S Reoort Mr. Panzer reported that he had met with Leona Jondahl concerning the alleged flooding problems which Mrs. Jondahl has experienced. Mr. Panzer prepared a report which has ^en distributed to Mr. Jondahl and to Minnetonka City Officials. It is Mr. Panzer’s conclusion# as stated in the report# that the flooding problems are duo to local drainage issues and not related to the water levels in the adjacent wetland. Manager Spensley requested that a copy of the report be forwarded to Hennepin County Coimnissioner Keefe who has expressed an interest in this situation. Mr. Panzer reported that precipitation for the month of June was slightly below the thirty year average. He also indicated that the flow at the Gray’s Bay control structure had been held constant at 12 <CFS) during the entire month of June. was the consensus of the Board of Managers that it was important to start reducing the lake level and that as of July 17th, the flow from the control structure should be increased to 70 (CFS). Attorneys Report Mr. Jones briefed the members of the Board of Managers on the status of District legal matters generally and the transition back of District counsel responsibilitiws to Louis Smith. Mr. Jones suggested that the implementation of the Wetlands Conservation Act creates a number of policy issues with legal consequences and suggested that a working session of the Board of Managers or one of its Committees be held to review these issues. Hew Business Manager Love suggested that upon the completion of the District's agreement with the City of Minnetonka, all Distric . meetings be moved to the Minnetonka City Hall. Manager Spens ly indicated that he had discussions with County Commissioners on this topic who believe that it would benefit the public to hold UCM) Board Uinutoa -13-(07/16/S2) • '‘ll all District meetings at one location. Manager LaBounty stated that the Minnetonka Council Chambers is an exceptional facility with significant audio-visual capabilities. He further stated that the council chambers is used by the Minnetonka Planning Comnission on the first and third Thursday of each month so that the District would need to change the date of its meeting in order to utilize the Minnetonka Council Chambers. Manager Spensley stated that changing the location of the District's meeting requires the District to follow certain procedures and requested the Attorney to review this issue and provide guidance to the Board. It was noted that the Cities of St. Louis Park and Mayzata have not charged the District for use of their facilities and Manager Spensley indicated he would work with Minnetonka officials to determine if the Council Chambers would be made available to the District on the same basis. It was the consensus of the Board of Managers that the second Thursday of each month would be an acceptable date for the meetings and October or November a reasonable timetable for moving meetings to the City of Minnetonka. a Manager Love stated that he believes it would be appropriate to request that the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) undertake the harvesting c»f millfoil in Gray's Bay and that the District close the Gray's Bay control structure for a period not to exceed four days during the harvest. It was moved by Manager Love and seconded by Manager LaBounty that the Engineer contact the LMCD and request that a time be established within the next thirty days for the harvesting of millfoil within Gray's Bay and that the Engineer be directed to close the headwater structure for a period not to exceed four days during the harvesting activities. Upon vote, the motion carried unanimously. f Adlgurnment There being no further business before the Board of Managers, the meeting was adjourned at 11:58 p.m. DAJ/918 irS UinutM -14-(07/1S/92) MIHIIEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT GLEASON CREEK HATER MANAGEMENT PROJECT RESOLUTION RECEIVING AMENDED ENGINEERS REPORT. DETERMIHINv* BENEFITS AND DAMAGES AMD ORDERING A FINAL PUBLIC HEARING DATED JULY 16. 1992 WHEREAS, the City of Wayzata, by Amended Petition dated March 18. 1992. requested the District to undertake the Gleason Creek Water Management Project; and WHEREAS. Engineers for the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District have completed their report required under Minnesota Statute Section 103D.711, which sets out the project plan for the und6rtakinQ of tho Gl©3Son Crook Wator ManaQORiont Projoct# and WHEREAS, the Managers received this report from the Engiheers on April 16, 1992, and finding the project part of the basic water management features of the Overall Plan of the watershed District and eligible for general levy financing in accordance with Minnesota Statute Section 103D.905, subd. 3. referred the report to the Board of Water and Soil Resources and the Director of the Division of Waters of the Department of Natural Resources; and WHEREAS, the District has received an advisory report from the Director c." the Division of Waters of the Department of Natural Resources regarding the Gleason Creek Water Management Project and the time period for receipt of an advisory report from the Board of Water and Soil Resources has expired pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 103D.711. subd. 5; and WHEREAS, the Engineers have prepared an amended report on the Gleason Creek Water Management Project to provide the Manaprs with more information on minor project modifications and impacts of the Gleason Creek Water Management Project; and WHEREAS, the Managers have elected to determine benefits and damages to the property affected by the project with the assistance of the Engineers pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sect^n 103D.721, and have determined, pursuant to Section 103D.721. subd. 4, that the District’s share of costs for the Gl* ison Creek Water Management Project is attributable entirely to the basic water management features of the improvement project and should be generally assessed by the District; and WHEREAS, the Managers with the assistance of the Engineer have determined that the Gleason Creek Water Management Project may affect owners of property adjacent to Gleason Lake by causing an intermittent increase in the water level of Gleason Lake, and therefore flowage easements will need to be acquired. The Managers have determined that such intermittent increases in the water level will remain within the flood plain, as determined by local ordinances, and, with few exceptions, will not affect any permanent structures. Any damages caused by the Gleason Creek Water Management Project are generally offset by benefits of the Project to affected property owners. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved as follows: That the Engineers Report, as amended, be received for filing by t'e Managers and that copies of the Report be forwarded to the Board of Water and Soil Resources and to the Director of the Division of Waters of the Department of Natural Resources to provide an opportunity for the Board and Director to supplement any advisory reports; and That the Managers hereby order a final public hearing on the petition and reports for the Gleason Creek Water Management Project, to be held on Thursday, August 20, 1992, at. 7:30 p.m. at Wayzata City Hall, 600 East Rice Street, Wayzata, Minnesota. The question was on the adoption of this resolution and there were six Ayes and zero Nays as follows: Managers Erickson LaBounty Lindley Love Maple-(absent) Spensley Thomas Aye X X X X X X HAX Ab&fiHL Upon vote the Chairman declared the resolution adopted. Dated this 16th day of July, 1992. I, John E. Thomas, Secretary of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, do hereby certify that I have compared the above resolution with the original thereof as the same appears of record and on file with the District and find the same to be a true and correct transcript thereof. In testimony thereof, I have hereto set forth my hand and affixed the seal of said watershed district this _ _ _ day of _ _ _ _ _ _ _, 1992. John E. Thomas, 458twm -2- City 0^ Sonka^ay MAYOR L. H. Haug COUNCIL R«iph Btndjtbar Sttvtn Johnton OougiM Ktiitf John S«ntsc«ll ADMINISTRATOR David Ciitisttr August 17, 1992 4901 Manitou Road. Tonka Bay. Minnesota 55331 Tel 474-7994 Representative Steve Smith 2710 Clare Lane Mound, MN 55364 Dear Rep. Smith: On behalf of our council we are concerned about the rules and regulations that are being forced upon us by the DNR and other state and regional agencies. Me agree with the letter that the City of Spring Park recently sent to Sen. Gen Olson. Me feel, like other Lake Minnetonka cities, that we have done a excellent job in managing the lakeshore areas in our communities. This is evidenced by the fact that a majority of our current shoreland regulations are more restrictive than the proposed ones by the DNR. Mr. Smith, if you will remember the meeting that we had with the UILOA at the Lay layette CLub, I requested that you, Gen Olson and Jerry Knickerbocker review the amount of money that is being allocated to the DNR and other agencies such as the Hennepin County park and ibrary systems. Me feel that the money being allocated, expecially for the park at the west end Lake Minnetonka, needs to be re^-evaluated. For example, the 30 to 50 million dollars that is being spent on this park would allow us to run the city of Tonka Bay for 50-75 years. Lest we forget that the money allocated to the DNR to reimburse cities for implementing the shoreland ordinance is tax payers money. The cost of implementing this ordinance in Tonka Bay will run between $6,000 to $7,000. For your information, several years aoo the City codified aUL of its ordinances for only $5,000. Please give this issue some thought Sincerely, CITY OF TONKA BAY t 8 isai Mayor aug r r n cc: ^n. Gen Olson *>l^ke Minnetonka Mayors f Slii D association ofmerropolitan municipaiities ULL TIN August 10, 1992 A’JG 1 2 TO;Mayors, Managers/Administrators FROM;Vern Peterson RE; II. TAB NOMINATIONS, METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE MEETINGS, ETC. I. TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD (TAB) NOMINATIONS; The TAB is a very important transportation r ated advisory body and provides input to the Metropolitan council, MNDOT and the Regional Transportation Board. It has many important functions including the Annual prioritization for funding FAU projects. The role of TAB and the city officials on TAB has been significantly enhanced under the provisions of the new Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991. Ten positions on TAB are reserved for city elected officials (Mayors or CounciImembers) and the AMM has the responsibility for selecting those officials. The TAB terms are for two-years and will begin October 1, 1992 and run thru September 30, 1994. The TAB nooially meets the third Wednesday afternoon of each month in the Metropolitan Council Office. RECOMMENDATIONS WANTED; The AMM Board is soliciting recommendations/volunteers for TAB via this bulletin. Some of the incumbents will be reappointed but there will be several new appointments and officials are needed from all parts of the metropolitan area. Recommendations should be in %rritten form and submitted to the AMM office to the attention of Vem Peterson, by no later than August 24, 1992. MEETINGS TO DISCUSS THE AMMS' METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE TASK FORCE REPORT; The Metropolitan Governance Task Force is ready to renew its deliberations and finalize its report on the form regional governance should have in the metropolitan area. -1- 183 university avenue east st naul. mmncsota 55101 (612) 227-4008 To this end, the Task Force has scheduled two meetings to solicit comments from you - member city officials - to help provide direction. The first is August 20 at 7 p.m. in the St. Louis Park City Council chambers for city officials on the western side of the metropolitan area. The second is planned for August 27 at 7 p.m. in the Maplewood City Council cheunbers for officials in the eastern portion. Both meetings are expected to last two hours. St. Louis Park city offices are at 5005 Minnetonka Blvd. Exit at Highway 100, go south to Minnetonka Boulevard, go east for three blocks. The Maplewood city offices address is 1830 E. County Road B, about one block east of White Bear Avenue, and about four blocks south of Highway 36. The Task Force's preliminary report, issued during the AMM's Annual Meeting, has generated discussion among state, regional and metropolitan agency officials. We hope to spark good discussion from city officials. We have several areas that need development, such as the transit/transportation/MTC/RTB question, and we look to you for some guidance. A copy of the report was mailed to your manager or administrator in early June. Please call our office (490-3301) if you need a copy of the report. Task Force members hope for lots officials before taking any nv.*^ report. We want this to reflect view and conse-s.-sus. not just the recommendations requiring legis' considered by the appropriate AMI of comments from city action on the preliminary city officials' points of Task Force. Any >wive action would be [ policy committee. Again, we hope we can see you at one of the meetings and please call our office and let us know if you wish to speak. III. REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD (RTB) Ia^JAL OFFICIALS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (LOAC): Nominations are also needed for the RTB Local Officials Advisory Committee. This advisory body which as its name implies was established to provide input to the RTB and its chair, is being revitalized. The AMM Board recently evaluated this body and believes it can play a more important role in the regional transit system and encourages city officials to participate. Members of the RTB Local Officials Advisory Committee can be either elected or -2- f 1 I appointed city officials. The committee normally meets the second Wednesday morning of each month at 7:30 a.m. The names of all city officials willing to serve on this committee should be forwarded to the AMN office, to tlie attention of Vem Peterson, by no later than August 24, 1992. DISTRIBUTION NOTE: _*his bulletin has been mailed to Mayors and Managers/Administrators only. We would appreciate it if the administrative official would distribute copies to all counciImembers as well. Thank you -3- rt- ii iolw MbuMtoiilta Cabte Com:i in icaUons CommlMlon 443 OAK STRCCT • fXCCLSIOfl. MINNESOTA SS331 • <613) 47A5639 LAKE HimiETOIIKA CABLE COlUIUMICATIOIIS COHHISSIOII FULL COHNXSSIOII RSSTIM TUESDAY* AUOUST IS. 1992 StOO S.M. r f EXCELSIOS COHRURITY CSRTBK AUOITOBIUN <Across tns hsil £ros Cossunlty TV 12 - AOKMDA 1. II. Csll to Ordsr Approval ot July iS*?! R^nutss t r r « A •Sopcrt# s> Ctixcmzm: Troasurar -1. July 1992 Cnscie ksgxstsr 2. 1992 Second Ousrtsr ksport b> Aamin^strator/f’rooucto.on Coordinators c> Triax ,a&.«vxaion ZV« Unfxnxsnad Au^xnads a' lcd6t« :r. lhannai t kaeaptxon Concarn - wxth Irxax written cost projection to proouca technically accaotaola sional - Stafi b) Status ci Studio Ecuipeant keplacenent - Start c> lasK rorca kaport on Ottice/otuaio Relocation - Pattrin at Denials Six Month Raview Kaoort - brancal/kattrilt V. New Business S' Corsittaa Kaoort for 199S Budget - brancai b> Rrospactiva Cnance in Conmission Voting Structure - Staff c; Award Viiac Program of tna Ouarter - brancai VI. VII. Ratters Froe The Floor Adjourneent W '■ id 111 mm mm '-••A i?- Hi ■'U UKE RINNETONKA CABLE CORRUMICATIONS COHRISSION EXECUTIVE COHRITTEE REETING TUESDAY, JULY 21, 1992, S:00 PH POOR 204, EXCELSIOB CORRUMITY CENTER 443 OAK STREET, EXCELSIOR I. CALL :'0 ORDER Vic* Chair Old* call*d th* a*«ting to ord*r at S:02 DIRECTORS PRESERT Jia 01ds/Exc*laior D*iinif Stanga/D**ph4v*n ?i« Pattrin/Orono Tib Salazar/Hinn*trx«ta L**i*y Ku9n*B'S*aaan«/Tonica bay OTHERS PRESERT Jib Dani*la/Adaifustrator Coll*«n Lxndakoog/Adain Aaat. Jxa Schxndlar/1roduct. Coor. Brxan Bargstros/Orono Prod. Coor. Paul Nasarow/Tnax Cablovisxon Pat Shultt/Long Lak* 11.APPROVAL or R1ROTES Olds askad for ditcussxon or Botxon to aporova tia axnutas of tha Juna 16. 19^2 B**txng. Motion 7.21.92.1 Pattrin aovad to approva tha Bxnuta*. Huonas*SaaBans facondac. Ration passod unaniaoualy. 111. REPORTS Traasurar*s Raport Pattrin d*%scrxbad financial transacticn* for th* aonth. Motion /.21.92.2_ _ _ Stanga aovad to approva tn* ChacK 'Jisoursaaants for tha parioc of 6/; 91 througn 6/30/92. Hughas-Saaaans sacondad. notion paaaad un- aniaoualy. AdBinistrator*a RaPort Darn*.* inforaad tn* Coaaissiorj that Paul Pond froir Kinnatrist.a nas raplacad Otto Wilczar: on tha ;'ull Coaaission. Tha aiKorski luncnaon was cancailad. Houavar. H.R. 4650 snould b* dabatad on tn* full floor thi.; Thursday,'.7-23-S2). Raastad's offic* thimc* tnar* will ba aaandaants to it. Lanial* fait tnit tna NFLCP want raai wail, out Jit ocnindiar aojld spaax on It in ms raocrt. Production RaBort Schinciar rtatad t.nat 6 naw prograas nav* oaan craatad sine* tn* April 1992 aaatinq. na statac that fiv* voluntaars froi our studio partieipatad in UFLCP, and thay ara: Rion Gavart, ’an haugan. Scott Saaranan. Tia Vilay and Joshua Wing. A Schindlar handiad tha thouont tna eonvartion was tha LRCCC studio, oava us qood total of 12 hour* of coriararc* sassions war* tapao. tachnical and of thing* and fait that tha paopl* attandinq want vary wall. Kaw worksnop sassions start zr.is waeic in our stuaic Th* NFLCP workshop roos had a sign stating that it Brochuras and nawslettars war* also avaiiaola, whien Scnindlar fait national, a* wall as local, covarag*. Pattrin asxad if tn* tapas war* for sal*. Schindla: said that tnay war* oy sail ordar. Pattrin than asicad if wa snouid run tnac on Channel 21. Schindlar thought It was a good idea but isn't sura if NFLCP approval is naadad. Old* askad tha cost of tha tapas. Scnincler said that tn* tap** ar* approxiaataiy »16.00 aach, but tnin<r thay giva a pnea braak th* aor* tapas you ordar. Ka faals thay would ba a good invastaant, *v*n if tnay ar* just usac as a rafaranc* library. Daniels stated that approxiaataiy 1000 people attandad, which ia an axcallant turnout. Schindler stated tnat Jan Haugan (•Where Ar* Thay Now*) has acquired four wood panels froa Plywood RN a* a donation for tha sat of her show. LHCcC - Jui/ 1991 Resting P»oe Two Trian K«port N«s«row ciitributed the progreeaina euaaary end tne subscription June 1992: Hoaes Passed 11,916 Basic Subs 124 Expanded Basic Subs 6,181 Total Pay Units 3,625 Total A/O’s 4,202 Total Reaotes 2,273 report for Ke the Nasarow coaeended Schindler and Jan Gray for their work at the NFLCP. stated that the Round studio's production of *Final Cutting* eon an award at conference. Nasarow showed an exaeple of the "Starporf attacheent for pay*per-view. riax has already installed 300 units with an additional 75 to 90 on an appointeen. basis. It takes approxieately 1 1/2 hours to install each unit. Installation is until Au9ust 10, 1992 «nd there are no eonthly cnar^es associated with havin9 the unit. Hu9hes-Seaaans asked if new subscribers would be charged for installation. Nasarow said aost likely it would be part of the basic installation. Pattrin asked if sore PPV channels would be offered. Nasarow stated that at this tine two events at the saae tine cannot happen but Triax is looking into it. Nasarow inforeed the Coeeission that on July 16, 1992 a Hennepin County trucK inadvertently ripped aown twc lines of trunk, inducing tne Fiber Optic line. Henn. Cc. did not saice contact to infore Triax of the accident until 40 ainutes after it took place. The repair job was coapleted by 6:40 p.s. of the saae day. However, ATAT will have to properly splice tne lines. Nasarow stated that the Triax subscribers will get a special rate of S76.00 ^he Clyapic aed Package (S95.00 national cost). Because of the Olyapics they wiIa not be carrying tne Twins PPV on July 30, 3l, and Aug. 1. Stanga assed what the response so far has been for the Olyapic pacsage. Nasarow said they have received four requests. On August i, 1992 a door-to-door caole install program will begin tfive week effort). Daniels asked Nasarow to be sure each city/pclica departaent be inforaed of this prior to going ahead in their respective cities, dus send a list of dates and cities to tne Caole Commission office. Production Report Continued Olds introduced Brian Bergstroe of tne Orono stucio and apologisec for aaking him wait. Bergstrom gave a brief oacKoround of tne Orono stucio. Ke stated that it has two eaaeras, two camcorders and two JVC field/studio cameras. The Orono studio does mostly school prograaaing and some coaaunity prograas. They do approxiaately 40 prograas per year. Bergstrom stated that they will nave a Video Production Class that is new this year. Olds asked if the equipment is availaole for puolic use. Bergstroa said yes It IS. Ke can be reacned Monday tnru Saturday at the Coamunity Education office. Pattrin commended Bergstrom for his work and asxed if the Orono equipment was in acceptable condition. Bergstrom stated that tne JVC cameras might need upgrading. Pattrin asieed if it is original equipment. Bergstroa said yes it is. Pottrin asKed if Bergstrom felt tnat the studio needed improvements. Bergstrom said that he felt it could use some improving. Pattrin tnen asked if the studio was easily accessible by the public. Bergstrom said t.-.at tne original location was better but now tney are located in tne casement and it is a little more Difficult to find. IV. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) Update on Channel 6 Reception Concern LKCCC - July MVt'ina P«9« Thr*« Daruelfl stated tn«t • letter wes sent to Channel 6 and Haric Oyaas but they did not respond. Salazar stated that their failure to respond is very frustrating. He asked about the possioility of eliainating Channel 6 and asiced Triax for a financial report of the costs involved eith fixing the reception. Ke stated he is •ware that it will eost likely not be done by Triax but needs the asount of soney Involved in writing so that the Cosaission can then proceed. WotioH 7.21.»2.3 Salazar aoved that Triax provide the Coesission with a financial report of repairing Channel t reception by the August 199i Meeting. Pattrin seconds. Masarow stated that he would be sure to have one coapleted. Pattrin stated that he wanted to sake sure that Triax does not take the blase if Channel 6 is renoved. Olds concurred. Salazar asked Daniels what the rasifications the Cosaission sight face. Daniels stated that soae cities do receive acceptable reception. Olds stated that there are cities outside of this Cosaission. but still part of t.ne Triax Cablevision service, and their feelings on this setter oust be taken into consideration prior to any action. Olds celled for the vcte. Hotion passed unanisously. and that caaera two Triex b) Status of Studio Equipsent Seplaceseat K’ezerow stetec tr.et ceeera one is on the way vie IPS will be shipped tnis out the studio kits ere here. leniels recocnencec tr.et enctner 10 oey exter;sion oe given to provice tne zeaeres. r.e fee-s tnet they ere trying to coapxy. Salazar concurred wit.t Daniels that Triex is trying, but felt that at tne full Coaaission aeetinc it sfiould be stressed that tne setter has been worked on in good faitn by ootn tne Executive Coasittee and Triax. Meties 7.21.92.4 Selezer aoved tc approve an additional 30 day axtanaion in coaplianca wxtn tne June aeetincs notion of 6.16.92.4, in tnat the fine egainst Triax would oe retroactive to the original date net forth. Hughes-Seeeans seconded. Rotion passed unanisously. c) Prospsctivs Locations for Offles/Studio Relocation Salazar Danisis to diatribute section K, pegs 1 of the Franchise Agreeasnt psrtair.ing to sites. It statss, *1. Local u'rigination Stuoio: a. Location (approxisate^ At Snorewood~Excalsior or ctner location rocossendod by Cable CoBSissior.* Nazarow ac»:novieageo tnat it la Triax's resporaibiiity to sove the studio. However, he aisc statec that tnere is not such availaole in this arsa. Ks haa looxec at 10 different places witnin the 14 sesber cossunitiss ana haa narrowed it down to two possicilities: Location 1 - Shorowood Shopping Center. The costa involved witn this location would oe approxisatsly Z25.000 (6.000 fsst of cable would be neecea at -Sll.OOO;. Hontnly rent would be S1138 per sonth. Location 2 - Hanna Shopping Plaza in Spring Park. Tne coats involved witn tnis locaticr. would be approxisatwly Si,000. Kazarow stated that t:.e funds involved with soving would have to cose fros aonewnere and asxed the Coesission for their input. The costs listed aoovs do not include the actual acving of tne eguipnent and the remodeling of the new studio. Salazar wanted it known that tne Cossission is not sowing for convenieneo ••Ice. It has to move, and tf.at we need to find a location that allows production to continue at the sane high level tnat it currently is at, Hs stated that he feels thst the Cossission needs to give direction tonight to Triax to coaplete the sove with as little disruption in service as possible. U,1 r • i 1 LMCCC - July 1991 B^eting Pace Four Old* concurred, now*v«r, leel* that technically apeaicing Triax is aora aware of what X* needed. He feels that the original location required in the Franchise Agreeeent or it'* general area i* a necessity and that two studios within 2 ailes of each other (Iccation 2 in conjunction to Hound studio) is redundant, but understands that cost is a factor. ®^***^®* that location 2 is the ideal location because Route 19 as highly traveled and will increase visibility within the cossunity. The rent cost* ere $77i per eonth. It is 6 siles fro* the current location in Excelsior to location 2* Location 1 has sore square footage but less visibility. Olds stated that he felt neither location was ideal fro* either Trisx's or the Coeeission's stand*point. Salazar stated that he felt that location Z would not be aceepteble. teUgB 7t21t?2i?_Pattrin eoved that a Task Force be organized to look at all sites with Mazarow and Daniels and report at the full Coaaission eeetinv. Olds asked if anyone has the tin* necessary for this type of activity. Salazar asked if location 1 was the chosen sit* would cable rates go up for the subscribers. Hazarow said that would eost likely be where the funds coe* froa. **^d*d*‘ should be a aajor consideration. Old* said that type of question was unfair to asK at this tise of Nazarow. Salazar seconded 'ne notion. Olds reiterated that under the teras of the Franchise Agreeeent. that Triax will have to costly without question but that the Commission can still be sensitive tc the cost* Triax will nave to enaure. Stanga asxed if the locations the Tasx Force look at would be other locations than those discussed tonight. Old* said that, nopefully. yes. Nazarow will provide tne Tasic Force with his list of possibilities. Kugnes'Seaaans asxed if tnere were any other areas that would also be around the cost of the *25,000 for location 1. O^ds called for tne vote. Notion passed uaaniaously. Old* asked for volunteers for the Tasx Force. Stanga, Pattrin. Salazar Kugrie*-Seaman* will be tne Relocation Tasx Force. Salazar asxed if adoitional cost* such as higner rent, etc. will be paid by suoscriber rate increases and if location 1 is selected will costs go to subscribers and s.nouid it. Daniels stated that tne agreement proposal is Triax IS committed to but tne costs involved cannot be connected to actual increases. Nazarow concurred with Daniels but stated tnat tne agreement 0" ^he part of the Commission. Salazar asked if the Ta*»: Force would maxe tne final decision tc the full Commission. Pattrin concurred that this thought berind tne motion. Old* didn't tninx tnat it was the Comzission's right to that decision. Saiazar reiterateo tnat ne feels that the Task force should the fir.il recoaaendation. Old* stated that the final decision i* not the Commissions to max* only if Triax wishes it to be moved out of the Excelsior/Shorwwood area. Salazar asxed Old* where in tne Franchise Agreement it states that Triax nas the final oecision. tnat * 1 that is required of Triax is that they comply with tne agreement and that i. to provide a studio in Excelsior-Jhcrewood. ano for the what rate also for was maxe maxe V. WEN BUSINESS a-1) Committee for Daniels Review Olds stateo tnat the Chair anc another volunteer is neeoed for review. Fattrin volunteered and Olds volunteered brancel. Kuohes-Seamans also volunteereo if needed. a-2) Committee for 1993 Budget Olds asxed for volunteers. Pattrin. Stanga ano Olos volunteered Brancel. p LMCCO - July Fiv« b) Potential Change la Coaslaaion Voting Structure Daniela diatr^butao a proposal and asked if Executive Coeeittee would like to go to the full Coaaissior.. Currently the vote is not cable related. Olds stated tnat the original structure was set up to represent the entire coeaunity, but has no objection to bringing it up with tne full Coeaission. Olds directed Daniels to include tne inforaation in the August 1992 packet but without a recoeeendation. Stanga asked how it was originally foraulated. Daniels explained that when originally done* the areas didn't have cable so the nueber of hones per area was used. The proposed options are connonly used foreulas. Discussion on Subscriber Conplaint Fors Procedure Daniels asked that this iten be tabled until the next nesting. d) RATOA Conference in Dallas* Texas - Septasber 9-12* 1992 Daniels stated tnat it would be beneficial for Connissioners to attend. Olds concurred but thought the full Connission should be aade aware of it and have an opportunity to show interest. Daniels stated that the inforaation was sent to the full Connission in the July 1992 pacxets and that Pattrin. Salasar and Stanga were the only responses. Hotion 7.21.92.6 Fattrin novec tnat funos be provided for tne Adninistrator and uo to three Conaissions tc be sent to NATOA. Salazar seconded. Pattrin statec tnat if attencing a report rnou.c be fortncoaing. Clds called for tne vote, fiction passed unaninously. e) Approval to fieplace Answering Machine with Voice Hail Daniels explained tnat tne current answering aachine nas Tne cost is Sle.75/iRonth witn failed a one ano tine were reconnends that Voice Mail oe usea. installation cnarge of SIO.OO. Pattrin asiceo wr*at tne acvantages would be. Daniels ststeo that there nuaerout advantages* nowever* tne best oeinc tne flexibility of Voice Heil. Motion 7.21.92.7 nygnes-Seaaanr aoved to epprove Voice Kail. Pattrin seconded. Hotion passed unaninously. g) Elect Vacancy Spot on Executive Cosnittee Olds statec tnat tnis snould go to the full Connission. Daniels wanted let everyone Know that Kay hirscn had resigned her position on the Coaaission. VI.MATTEdS FROM THE FLOOR Olds esxed for aatters fron tne floor. Pettrin esiced Sazarow tor ms Chief Tecnnician to provide a report to the Coanission of the capabilities of tne cable systea. Nazarow said that would not be a problea. Pattrin then asked Daniels about Telcos. Dsniels stated that the telepnone coapeny has possibly opened tne door to soee concerns* but doesn't hsve nuen inforaation at tnis tine. Ke feels tne NATOA conference will nave a lot of information s>n ▲ C f VII. ADJOURMHENT Motion 7.21.92.6 itir.ga ac-vec to aejourn. Pattrin seconded. Hotion passed unaninously. Tne aeeting w«s aejourneo at 7:0C p.a. Respectfully subaitted* Colleen Lindskbog Administrative Assistant t/05/92 8:48 an LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMISSION Cliant* IMCCCCHECK REGISTER Period ending 7/31/92 Page l 7/01/92 7/01/92 7/01/92 7/01/92 7/00/92 7/00/92 7/07/92 7/13/92 7/14/92 7/15/92 7/19/92 7/10/92 7/10/92 7/10/92 7/10/92 7/10/92 7/29/92 7/29/92 7/29/92 7/29/92 7/29/92 7/29/92 7/29/92 7/29/92 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 2637 2638 2639 2640 2641 2641 2642 2643 2644 2645 2645 2646 2647 2648 2649 2650 2651 2652 2653 2653 26*4 2656 2657 Account 517 533 514 514 205 511 530 205 542 207 511 514 508 520 536 533 517 539 207 511 530 523 517 553 7/29/92 7 2658 530 7/15/92 7 10412 205 7/15/92 7 10412 207 7/15/92 7 10412 500 V15/92 7 10413 205 715/92 7 10413 207 715/92 7 10413 505 715/92 7 10414 205 /15/92 7 10414 505 715/92 7 10415 205 715/92 7 10415 505 731/92 7 10416 205 731/92 7 10416 207 /31/92 7 10416 500 /31/92 7 10417 205 /31/92 7 10417 207 /31/92 7 10417 505 731/92 7 10418 205 ’/31/92 7 10418 505 r/31/92 7 10419 205 Deacriptlon JAMES SCHINDLER LEE'S RUBBER STAMPS JAMES SCHINDLER JAMES DANIELS NORHEST BANKS NORWEST BANKS NFLCP MN DEPT OF REVENUE POSTMASTER PERA PERA JAMES DANIELS PAYCHEX BERNICK 6 LIFSON EXCELSIOR ROTARY LAKE BUSINESS SUPPLY JAMES DANIELS U S WEST PERA PERA JAMES SCHINDLER PERA JAMES SCHINDLER MINNETONKA COMMUNITY SERV JAMES DANIELS JAMES DANIEI.S JAMES DANIELS JAMES DANIELS JAMES SCHINDLER JAMES SCHINDLER JAMES SCHINDLER COLLEEN LINDSKOOG COLLEEN LINDSKOOG MARY PETERSON MARY PETERSON JAMES DANIELS JAMES DANIELS JAMES DANIELS JAMES SCHINDLER JANES SCHINDLER JAMES SCHINDLER COLLEEN LINDSKOOG COLLEEN LINDSKOOG MARY PETERSON Iten Amt.Ref. Ant. 100.00 100.00 22.90 22.90 14.16 14.16 48.06 48.06 786.55 355.04 1,141.59 210.00 210.00 602.90 602.90 34.44 34.44 86.65 91.77 178.42 63.88 63.88 45.60 45.60 31.25 31.25 229.00 229.00 52.05 52.05 200.00 20C.00 90.48 90.48 93.61 99.14 192.75 41.25 41.25 12.00 12.00 100.00 100.00 430.00 430.00 68.90 68.90 -278.12 -55.52 1,312.50 978.86 -213.59 • 38.09 900.48 648.80 -10.36 99.69 89.33 -13.26 173.44 160.18 -278.12 -55.52 1,312.50 978.86 -213.59 -38.09 900.48 648.80 -25.57 154.06 128.49 -22.79 : t/OS/93 8:48 «a ■ I»t8 lit B«f. LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMISSION Clianf LMf«-CHECK REGISTER Period .ndin? 7/31/92 pig* 2 Account Dcacrlptton 7/31/92 7 10419 505 KASY PETERSON —Item Ant. 275.00 30 30 Checks for R«f # 2509 to # 10900 Chocks for ths Poriod Jr I. Pv: " u i,»T‘ ■. ..... i-, .. ^-037.71 cr Total of Chocks rl.242.62 A/C Hash lA.W.nnn All chock inforBotion is cooploto. No diagnostic report is nocossary. CHECKING ACCOUNT Beginning Balance Clains Dub Fees Interest $ 7977.25 -7795.16 10.00 9.59Service Charge -12.20 Ending Balance $ 189.48 NORWEST ACCOUNTS CD matures 8/4/92 CO natures 8/5/92 CO matures 8/5/92 $20000.00 25000.00 25000.00 $70000.00 SCCU ACCOUNTS Balance Share Acet Balance Preferred $17408.31 55124.82 $72533.13 TOTAL FUNDS $142722.61 2S2U1 1 2 4^ I SPARKS 4 CZERWONKA CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 5509 Ed«n Pralri« Road Ninnotonka, MN 55345 (612) 933-8986 LAKE MINNETONKA CABL^ COMMISSION Wo havo coi^>ilod tho accoapanying atataaant of Aasats, Llabllltlas and Fund Balancaa of LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMISSION» a non-profit organization, aa of Juna 30, 1992, and tha ralatad stataaant of Ravanua and Expanaas, on a caah baaia for tha pariod than andad. A eeapilation ia liaitad to praaanting in tha fora of financial atataaanta information that ia t^a rapraaantation of aanagaaant. Wa hava not auditad or raviavad the icconpanying financial atataaanta and, accordingly, do not axpraaa an opinion or any othar fora of aaauranca on thaa. Managaaant haa alactad to omit aubatantially all of tha dia- clouauraa ordinarily raquirad by ganarally accaptad accounting principlaa. If tha oaittad diaclouauraa wara includad in tha financial atataaanta, thay might influanca tha uaara concluaiona about tha coapanya financial atatua. Accordingly, thaaa financial atataaanta ara not daaignad for thoaa who ara not inforaad about auch aattara. SPARKS 4 CZERWONKA i July 29, 1992 • 1 L m fftt fiCMICAi Mir flMCUH Mim fOTiii mm tyNir LfM MM nm§ CM CUMfVT ffM »T4Tim«^ or • ci CAti Mtlt Mccr TfMi S.M.M ffl.O -------Ui % t.M _____LB lULIBJI ULSgua LJJ&itf I • M.m.M MM. MM. S,Mi. t.Mi. 4.M. • M 4.m.u m.M • r.Mi-M •.TFl-U HI.M m.n 1.: r».M 9.M i.M 4,Mi i.M n M M. m.M 4M.H 19F.SI I.M m.M m.M Mr.M tn.M M1.B m.n F.! •M»JM.M t H.1M.M MM.M I a.tH.M S.IM.M f.iM.H I.IM.M l«M4.il I.SM.M 1S.Mt.ll I.UI.M -LOLB I.M I.M fl.SS I.M 1S.M I.M 4,1 I.M 1.F1 I.M I.M I.M La laiM MMt. vfM fO • «M iiMT __m__■4TM___ 1 I.M • i.n tYii.wf.H 1 I.M I.M I.M Mri.M t.m.M Ml t.M ___m M^MI^MAMUii t I.M 1_____imimimi m ifMJMJll___l2Ml 1 I.M 1 I.M I IS.m.M iM.in.M m i.M I.M fI.4t1.M U.lM.ft m I.M I.M IM.M m.ti 4M I.M I.M 4.I4F.M 3,I11.M 4M I.M I.M F9F.M FFt.M m I.M I.M I.1M.M i.m.M 4M I.M I.M HF.il i.Mi.ii « I.M I.M I.IM.M SFI.M m I.M I.M FM.M IM.M m I.M I.M SIS.M i.m.M m I.M I.M sFi.n 1.SM.IF m I.M I.M IM.M m.M 4M I.M I.M FM.M 1,Mi.4F IM I.M I.M S4F.M MI.I9 141 I.M I.M IM.M lM.il Ml I.M I.M m.a 4M.FF ffl I.M I.M i.m.M 4.MI.M Ml I.M I.M m • I.M • I.M 1 M.Mi.n MF.m.fi ”SM 1 I.M • I.M 1 I.M 1 I.IM.M HM I.M I.M I.M l.SH.M MM I.M I.M m.a t,Mi.ii ffl I.M I.M I.M 1.IM.M MM I.M I.M 4, m.M i.m.3 ra I.M I.M im 4.iim MM I.M I.M FFi.n H.tlF.41 fM I.M I.M I.M i,4a.M MM I.M I.M I.4I9.M MM I.M LM Oa BUI IIM 1 I.M 1____UILJLOLII mma —on liM.m.if ti4.m.M ___Ui t M.SM.fF f ____m . M I I.M i S4.FSA.M im.4ll.l4 OM tM OUiUtl L kSATTS anCKZNC ACCOUMT/IK>lllfCST •CCD SNMtC OlUfT ACCOUNT tccu ntcriRMD acoouht cnrzr op dipoczt t/4/ia cmTzr or obposzt t/s/ta cEXTzr OP oiPOtZT a/5/9a 7,*77.as 17,40t.31 ss,za4.«a ao.ooo.oo as,000.00 as.OOP.00 TOTAL CUMdirr ASSETS TOTAL ASSETS t.TAmTT.TTTgj| AMH gftIf;TTY ^XABILIZXES lS0.SlQ.il iso.sio.ii PAYSOLL TAXES laTHHEU) PBItSZOS SSMEPZTS SITMMELO TOTAL cumtirr liaszlztzes 1,319.45 1S.6S l,47ioIO 4*iJ*M **.*^44 ALLOCATED OPESATI1I6 FUND ALLOCATED SPCCZAt PUHOS UNALLOCATED PUNDS 57,329.79 56,219.15 15.415.34 TOTAL EQUITY 149.014.11 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7 . 8. 9. ilk^ •i -I iLAKE MIHHETOHKA COHSBKfATIOH DISTRICT WATER STRUCTURES COMMITTEE *'*'"'* AU61.07:30 AM Saturdaj. August 15. 1992 ^ Norwsst Bank Bldg. 900 E Wayzata Blvd. Ba 135 (Elavator accass for handicappad. usa vast antranca. Wayzata Blvd) nuTtipla dock licf'saa: A. Worth Shorn Dri»* Warina, Mazwall Bay. Orono: ranawal with amor ehanga. updata on status with Orono. aamo attachad B. Bhorowood Yacht Club. Cidaon's Bay. Shorawood: renewal without change , . C. Hathodiat Lakoaida Aaaaably. Wayzata Bay, Woodland; application for change, aa allowed par new Ord. 116. trading 5 DMA for 5 boat lifts next to dock par site plan dated 2/3/92, reducing DMA license froa 7 moorings to 2 D. Wayzata Yacht Club, Site 2, Wayzata Bay. Wayzata; dated 6/18/92, replacing proposed platform shown on “/^/u® plan with a smaller seasonal make ready dock, 6 z 40 , update on zoning status with Wayzata, memo attached B. St. Albaa's Day Mariaa, St. Albans Bay, Excelsior: new owner- Bell Waterfront Corporation, and review of amenities for special density naw Multiple dock licansaa par 7/29/92 latter Code Section 2.05 Special Density Licenses. Subcommittee report on study of non-restricted watercraft and off- lake storage at multiple docks Review of permanent dock definition; staff recommends making the definition the same as the DNR permanent dock definition Annual 3*A boats/dock invantorys staff raport News report concerning Hennepin Regional Park and initial plans for transient dockage, for discussion Lost Lake Channel- Mounds plans to develop this area and the affect on surrounding wetlands and wildlife, for discussion LMCD policy and DNR’s position on docks placed over wetlands, for discussion Additional business recommended by the committee Jl ).A. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Autust A, 1992 To: Motor Structuros CoMittoo Frea: Roehol Thiboult Subj: North Shoro Drioo Horino COMlttOO Attoehod io o lottor froa tho City of Orono to North Shoro Drivo Horioo idootifyiot oooorol ioouoo tho city wiohoo to roooloo with tho aorino. Ono of tho ioouoo of porticulor coaeorn to tho LHCD ia tho quootion on tho nuabor of dry otockod” booto. A dry otock ogrooBont woo oxocutod botwoon Orono oad North Shoro Drivo Horino on July 29. 1977 oo o otipulotion of oottloaoat of litigotien botwoon thoa. It liaitod tho aorino to 20 boots **dry otockod** for loko uoo« In 1988. tho LHCD ollowod Boriaoo with "dry stock” to docloro and license tho nuabor of rocks they hod before o now restrictive off-loko ordinonco wont into effect* North Shoro Drivo Horino hod 72 rocks in place oven though tho court sottloaont liaitod thoa to 20 boats "dry stocked”. It appears that tho LHCD woo unaware of tho city's liait on tho aorino s dry stocking at that tiao oad licensed tho 72 rocks so tho aorino if^g paying for what existed. Tho court sottloaont was inforaolly brought to staff's attention this spring, but no copy has boon provided. In discussing this issue with Mike Coffron. Orono's Asst. Zoning and Flonning Adainistrotor. ho said that tho concern of tho city is not priaarily tho nuabor of boots stored on the rocks. Tho concern is that only 20 of thoa ore ollowod for use in and out of tho loko. with tho root for service. long tora storage, etc. An additional concern io that there is also a discrepancy on tho total nuabor of boats poraittod to bo stored at 0it#a Orono hnn p#r«ittod North Shoro Drivo Horino for 8o boot slips and 20 boats dry stacked, for^a total of 106 for lake use. An additional 45 "other boats" on land for service, sales, etc. have boon permitted for a total density of 151. Tho LMCD has licensed the marina for 93 in the water and 72 on the racks for a total of 165. The LMCD amount does not take into account any miscellaneous land storage for service and sales, etc* Th« followiac is s brisi suMsry of how tho difforonces appear to have davalopad. In 1984, a court sottlanant was batwaan tha LMCD and North Shora Oriva narina to rebuild tha aariaa docks within 200*. Tha sattlanant. which included 74 storage slips, 6 service, 6 transient, and 20 tack spaces for a total of 108 boats (already a discrepancy of 2), was approved by the Board 2/22/84 subject to an as> survey. After the docks were built, an as'*built survey was approved 4/87 for 81 storage, 4 transient, 4 service and 20 racks for a total of 113 boats. In 1988 the rack storage was aaeaded to 72 for a new total of 145 boats. The current proposal recoMonded by staff for asking the 8 lagoon slips transient and the reaaining 85 storage and service, was to resolve a difficulty the narina was ha'ing when asked to identify the 4 transient and 4 service slips. Ik was a practical coaproaise to aake the 8 lagoon slips the kkansient area to serve the rack storage, and to allow the 4 service slips to be used as needed aaong the lakeward slips. Staff further suggests the LMCD recognize Orono's position iiviting 20 of the dry stack storage spaces to in and out service, with the balance for service, sales, etc. The applicant has stated to Orono that this nuaber aore than aaets the aariaa*a needs. Staff has discussed working with Orono to resolve the discrapancies between the LMCD and the city over the nuaber of boats stored at this site with Hike Caffron. His response has been optiaistie that the differences can be resolved. He will be asking a report to Orono's Lake Use eoaaittee 8/12/92. An update will be given at LHCD*s Hater Structures End. Oroao'a 5/28/92 letter. Site plan e: H. Caffron, Orono North Shore Drive Marina GITYof ORONO 9mU Mmy 28, 1992 Worth Shoro Drivo Marina 3222 North Shorn Drive Wnyzata# Minnesota 55391 ATTENTIONj Mark and Debra Breneman Ms Licensing Update Dear Mr* and Mrs. Breneinanj Thank you for submitting your 1992 Coj^mfi T^. flV^S Irellctton -hlch V.. r.civ.d by thi. I^wl*d9*d i* r*c*ipt of your check in the amount of «04J, The dry eteck agreement %V^ich il“T ”lp2lU'ion'"5f 5^t^^•«:n?"Sr img'atron'SeVw^^^^^ than 20 boats would be "dry stacked forsake use. The 86 boat .IIP. referred to and the 20 bo.t. -,y 1 na- K».^e for lake u.e. Addltl^MUy, ^ SSWrffif;'MlaTe'tS; Hav. been permitt..or a otal density of 151 boats* Your current licenae *Pf •naitv’^of VlO "*TVo^ 86. You propose 7? boats drv si:a.caeg *.»*_* --------— Court settlement. Under its present ordinances, would TEL£rHONE-47J-73S7 • rAX-47J^I0 J North Shore Drive Marina SUy 20* 1992 rage 2 ' ConsequentlYf - - oa the property within 30 da ISO, aafaait ^ of boat! veeeda this nuaberM- anfl» aa a t a reviaea application form. irhile the LMCO haa aince 1000 required you to lieenae the 52 dry ■tack In addition to the boat uae juat diacuaaed* the ^^ty haa previoualy lieeaaed you for 02 winter atored boata on the aite in place of the teata in tl ^ water during the aunner. Yog lyy now for no awre than 02 winter atored boata. It doea appear for varioua reaaona that you have overpaid the City lleSSir flien.. y«r. 1»« «nd Ihloverpayment ia encloaed, and you will recexve a refund check for the difference. During my inapection tour of your site on March fCity^S you the following additional problems which might _ refusal to grant a license* but which I am aware you are making pla to resolves 1. Lack of required screening along west aide of service building. 2 Aooarent increases in hardcover along the west .®£ lagoon (parking area not shown on 1904 variance applicatio site plan). 3. 8ub.t.nti.l .pp.r.nt locr..... wh.B n«tup.l ground cov.r ««s gravel between dry stacks and County Road 5i. 4. 0.n.r.l upk«p of the .it., which y®“«•'* •"** you noted you are in the process of cleaning up. 5. I also mentioned wO you a number of future items for discussion* including: A e Establishing a jrass buffer area along the shoreline. b. Future hardcover reductions should be anticipated tforth Shore Drive Merxna May 2S# 1**2 Fage 3 e. F»tur. r.qtt*«tt by tb. City for tunoff__eoj^l f^eilities ebottld be anblcipeted, d. Review of your aignage allowances is in order. in nddltion. yon .dTi..d ,;;,V rionxT"r.f« •55?%o'T»;^icnt7b.^o5;?in\tor John O.rh.rd.on regarding this ■attar. Too .l.o n.ntion.d you !** "on° n9"Adnini.tr«tor ■arina. including a two l.».l i„ yout Ji:rinV5«5*“» ihVt inan* l%\V.«a*.onln, cod. conflict, can b. avoided. Tour application indicate. •Cbri.t.a* "i:.*!.^ not’*n bn.ine*. , *2*iona*'a*though under certain condition, itallowed uaa in the B-2 zone, a^nougn „.,onal u.e. The ;t:^r t:y*jr^«"r.u''e*‘.pp~:aT*o"f <jri.t~. «,\-s».v.r%"i"e%"t‘i ?s:tf u^n'ti! ci;ii:t*i.: ?l2i".’a!r."beco»;. .n approved u.e in the B-2 rone* we cannot allow such sale* to occur. ■ ‘ rinaa Tr s: ci?p ‘”n?luJiSgU^h Url Ki«K!??!”:-V..:ri--.f-f.ct upon the coMittee investigating these especially in regard opeM^Tons^^ I would further note that while rte |J*2g^*’^a*g,pteaSor*20th of Mrait for the IB B... *»“"«;** “%i“\cti^i?ie. nay be withheld Shi. yeer, future •PP*®**^* AlnV to your licen.lng have been until »uch tine a. i.eue. relating to you resolved. I lOKTH SHORE DRIVE MARINA> Xipttlatlont that cha east side if tha Main dock Ka algnad laadlcappad loading and •laading only.” 9;26:90 9 •varnlghC boat parking at tha cranaiant alipa !• agraaMnt with Court Ordar of f-12-86 ■ • rr-'**-% 4 Kt>]2.int T a 4. RECEIVED NOV 2 5 1986 i. UMlc,ut ' /fff- ar^Sj^ni) /9fx • " 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. LAKE MIimBTOIlKA COMSBIVATION DlSTf^T- LAKE USE AND RECREATION COHHITTEE^ AGENDA Honda/, August 17, 1992, 4:30 PM Norwost Bank Building 900 E. Wa/iata Blvd, Room 135 (Elavator accoss for Handicappad: usa wast antranca on Hayzata Blvd.) A'siu 1 2 1. Slow Buoys - raquast to add in Halstad's Bay naar King's Point accass: Public haaring and Coda awandoant raquirad Spacial Bvants A. Daposit Rafund D $100: *MN NI Pro Aa Bass Tournaaant 5/31/92 B. Spacial Evant Ranawal, Don Shalby US Invitational Bass Tournaaant, 9/11/92-9/13/92, adding a parachuta juap on Sunday 9/13/92 to tha avant, staff racoBusanding approval with stipulations par attachad Updata on adding lights at tha Narrows channal, waao froa Danis Bailay. Hannapin County Laka laprovaaants, staff racoaaanding coaaittaa approval to tha Board Dacibal lavals on Laka Ninnatonka. staff raport on davaloping study to change froa 82 to 79 Charter boats at City of Excelsior docks, copy of axacutiva director’s latter to all charter boats using docks, for inforastion Goals A Objactivas review as distributed at the 7/20/92 aaating. Chair progress raport BWI Education progran for convicted offenders involving HADO prograa, progress report Hater Patrol Raport A. Monthly Activity Report 9, Additional business recomaanded by tha committee .■ •LtXill'. i i’. ri Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Mean Park Centre. 250 East Fifth Street. St. Paul. Minnesota 53101 >1633 612 222 M23 August 14, 1992 Mayor Barbara Peterson City of Orono PO Bex 164 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Ao'J 1 9 -- r c r- Dear Mayor Peterson: The purpose of this letter is to provide you with infomation regarding the 1993 sewer service charges on the enclosed statenent. The annual sewer service charges are based on the estimated volume of Orono*s sewer flow relative to the estimated flow from all sewered coamunities using the Metropolitan Disposal System. When 1993 is completed and actual flow for 1993 is known, these estimated sewer service charges are adjusted accordingly. They are also adjusted for any deviations in the Commission's revenue or expenditure budgets. The statement shows the estimated wastewater flow from your community and its sewer service charges based on the MWCC's 1993 budget. The 1993 estimate of your community's flow is based on past flow records, precipitation trends and anticipated community growth. The statement also shows any credits or debits from these sources: Current Value Credit, Debt Payment Credit, and the 1991 Final Cost Allocation. I am forwarding a copy of these and a 1991 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report to your finance officer. If you have any questions, please let me know. If you would like additional copies of any of these documents or the MWCC's 1993 budget, please contact Lois Spear at 229-2017. Ver^truly yours, Louis R. Clark Chair CRW:CJW:pap Enclosures cc:Finance Officer Commissioner Gloria vierling Gordon O. Voss, Chief Administrator, NWCC Lois I. Spear, Controller, MWCC L081492.SSC Equal OppOftumtylAtlIrffiaiiva Actioo Empioyar iS O <1 METROPOUTAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED 1993 SEWER SERVICE CHARGES (WHOLE DOLLARS) 9148 Ofono QALLONAQE ESTIMATED COST FOR M GALLONS AMOUNT CURRENT USE CHARGES: SEWER SERVICE COST 210 1201.10 292^31 SALES TAX 3,992 TOTAL SEWER SERVICE COST 299.703 OTHER CREDITS OR CHARGES: CURRENT VALUE CREDIT DEBT PAYMENT CREDIT 1991 nNALCOSTAUOCATION 33.980 0 (41.307)'i TOTAL CREDITS OR CHARGES (7.319) 4^1 TOTAL ANNUAL ESTIMATED NET PAY:..ENT DUE 299.948 MONTHLY INSTALLMENT 21.629 Du4 on tho first day of sach month. Installmants not raealvad by tha 10th of aach month in which diia shall bs ragardad as dallrKiuant and shall baar intarast from tha first day of such month. i M « M Q i^ugust 191 1992, t J TO I ki Orono City Council Mary Butlor j. Dlann Gootton — - Gabrlol Jabbour Edward Callahan Barbara Patarton, Mayor Bon Moorsa, City Adalnlstrator AUS 2 1 1892 PROM I SUBJECT! Mika Ungar^ Dlvlaion Mfg. Support Managar Plra k Eaargancy Madleal Protactlon 1 work lor tfaahlngton Sclantlllc Ind. Inc and rapraiantad at tha Orono City Council naatlng yaatarday. I had to Xaava tha naatlng at SiGGpn lor a School Board aaatlng at another location and I was unabla to axprasa ny opinion concerning tha proposed change in Plra 6 Bnargancy Medical Response Service away Iron tha Long Lake fire Oapartnant. Following are ny opinions on this natter which should be considered as tha position o£ Washington Bclantlflc Znd. Inc. We are located slightly west o£ tha proposed boundary o£ service by tha Long Lake Plra Oapartnant. Tha proposal would give us service £ron the Maple Plain Tire Oapartnant. Thera Is no doubt that Washington 8clentl£lc Ind. Inc. would axparlanca a narked dacraasa In anargancy service 1£ It is changed to Maple Plain. This dacraasa is slnply not acceptable to tha conpany nor Its anployaas £or tha £ollowlng reasonsI if« are a heavy user o£ anargancy nadlcal response service with at least one anployaa having a chronic heart condition. It now originates £ron Long Laka, one nlla away. Tha Maple Plain Plra Oapartnant Is £our aiXas away. Tha added distance would add at least 3-4 nXnutas to tha response tine which nay have dlsastarous a££acts. Although wa have had few fire calls In recant years, the sane situation applies to fire service. The distance is four tines as far for Maple Plain. Jfub VNjvAiLi tkHik varJ L l »hk l^ke. .Viinfu.*MiU 4r>l2Tl . Kit lbl2) 4rV-2W Fa9* 2 N« hav« btaa thoroughly iotisflod with tho proupt ••rvieo providod by tho Long Lako Fira Dapartuant# ineludlog CPP Inatructlon for kay aaployaaa. Thara la no iaaua with tha conpatancy of tha Mapla Plain Plra Dapartaant but, rathar, our concarn ia with tha addad diatanca eouplad with tha eonjaation on Highway 12. X war ancouragad by two axpraaaad poaitions at tha aaatlngt 1-That a daeiaion on a providar of aarvlca would ba nada on tha baaia of raaponaa tina, not ainply aeononiea# alnea It ia inpoaalbla to plaea a valua on a hunan Ufa. 2-That both tha Long Laka Flra Oapartnant and tha Orono City Council wara willing to nogotiata diaaatisfaetions out of tha propoaal. tha baat a 24It ia critical that thia daeiaion ba nada in intaraata of tha affactad citiaana. Our conpany oparata houra/day and anploya owar 2#0 paopla in our Orono Plant that, for tha aoat part, do not appaar aa raaidanta of tha •raa. Tbaaa paopla ara dapandant on faat and affactive •■•rganey aarvica. Tha baat intaraata of thaaa paopla will not ba aarvad if tha praaant providar la ehangad. Ha raconnand that tha diaaatiafactiona with tha praaant propoaal ba negotiated to tha aatiafaetion of tha City Council and that tha providar of aarvica not ba ehangad. 44 1*1 .‘H.1 d*5Vi I I . -4‘‘ _