Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
08-10-1992 Council Packet
if W'm- p-i m- ;:|f 'wmpr mw'W: . K ft ‘■K il’ X' Bp a. Proai K Dat*i Chairman Kelley and Planning O'" ftr.i r** ion Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusthr Building & July 14, 1992 c 5?^Zoning Administrated, 7 Cl ''<55 %> V ^ #1753 Skip Madge, 875 Forest Arms Lane - Variances - Public Hearing \ PcrtiSMit Ordinances 1. 2. sHilvvft Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - Average lakeshore setback Variance required. Review Exhibit I, any accessory structure placed in front of the stricture at the lakeshore side would require variance approval as followot A. B. Proposed pool and patio area. Ii*xl3* shed. The City has no record of issuing a building permit for lakeside shed. Applicant must seek approval of after the fact average lakeshore setback for shed. C.8*x3* temporarily Installed lock box at *oreline does require approval of an average lakeshore setback variance. Structure will be relocated out of lakeshore protected area. D.Pmqi> bouse structure located at shoreline. The City has no record of issuing a permit for this structure. Applicant should provide background information. DMR advised that a permit is *»'*t necessar*^ if owner limit use to 10,000 gallons of water day or 1 million gallons per year. B. Fence to be installed at 5* height. Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Review of lot coverage. Total area of property 56,095 s.f. Allowed * 8,414.25 s.f. or 151 Proposed “ 5,388 s.f. or 9.6%. Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 basin at 1,068 s.f. Required - 30* Proposed • 22* Variance • 8* or 26.6% (D) “ Required setback for pool ! :’K.Sdfiifig rii« #1753 J«Xy 14t 1992 Wmsim 2 ’'fa Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 -• Hardcover review. 0-75' setback area - 10,725 s.f. Allowed - 0 Existing 636 s.f. (Note pump house and lock box are placed on landscape area underlain with plastic. Review Exhibit R - no suggestion. ^.0 '•fr -5-- rf'h 75-250* setback area * 25,025 s.f. per applicant's hardcover fact sheets ■ 24,850 s.f. per staff's calculation Existing hardcover ■ 357 s.f. Proposed ■ 2,684 s.f. or 10.8% (Hardcover facts include relocated lock box) ' if 'Vui 'M 250*-*500* ••tback area » 26,188.65 s.f. per applicant's hardcover facta • 20,520 s.f. per staff's review of survey Allowed ■ 6,156 s.f. or 30% Bsiisting » 8,811.50 s.f. or 42.9% liiat IttL miftV.,. • of Ebdd^ito A - Application - Property Owners List - Plat Map * Neighbor*s Acknowledgment Form - NCND Permit 6/24/92 - Landscape Plan Application #1704 “ Planting Schedule Application #1704 > 1-2 Hardcover Pact Sheets - Survey - Site Plan E- Original landscape plan/sketch submitted to staff when original violations were citod. L - Coim>laint letter from neighboring . —operty cwners. B Cu Er 6 H X J s t MB^I#Biom of ■eqeaet Applicant seeks approval oi' an average lakeshore setback variance to install a pool and patio area within the lakeshore yard of the property. As with all the properties developed within Forest Arms Lame# the homes have been developed in an aligimmnt close to the road. Any installation of accessory structures within the lakeshore yards of these properties require average lakeshore^ setback variances. The flsf lot fwisdiately adjacent to the property aiso impacts the average lakeshore setback line of this property. The City has no record of a building permit being Issued for the lakeside shed. The sheJ meets six reguired setbacks except for the average lakeshore setback. Note there la no hardcover excess within the 75-250* setback area. As Sireedy noted, the lock box must meet the 75* setback. Applicant i^MKlld provide Information a» to date of the installation of the pusqp heuee structure. The City h«s no record of a permit being Issued for the structure. m i V-r' ' 'r*1»'®A j.%ky-i■ V • f TOt Mayor Paterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorsor City Administrator Q:'<j >. /» %*"<6 fiOMi tv mnt Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Administrator July 29, 1992 ^>J5 %V SIINMKCT i #1752 George M. Kalweit, 4265 Forest Lake Drive - After the Fact Variance - Request to Waive Penalty Fee M^ha July 2**, 1992 meeting of the Council, the above referenced ug^Xleation w- placed on the consent agenda, with the placing of the itaa on tha cc sent agenda, the City failed to provide applicant with diraetion involving thair request to waive the penalty fee paid at the %1m of the filing of the application ($175.00). Please review •aiginal inhibit J, the Kalweit letter of July 17, 1992. The letter laviaas the unusual circumstances and background surrounding the fapalr of tlwi deck. Applicant will be present to discuss this matter at tha August 10th Council meeting. In the interim, staff will not ||haf^ a penalty fee for the building permit until Council has made a determination. i’M . ■■ ■0k/" T^% t'Ufi'- •u iMiaoiiiilik •T^V'- sig# % Planning Commission of Orono Orono City Council City of Orono I July 17,1992 City of Orono Orono» Hinnosota On April 24,1992 we became owners of the property at 4265 format Lake Drive. Previous to purchasing the property, we eneeeed the services of '' certified home inspector, rtr. Ooneld Hedquiat.who determined that the deck had dangerously rotting boards which should be replaced and joists which should be reinforced. Therefore we hired a carpenter, Mr. Tony Schrempp, to make the needed repairs. He is from Victoria and has never done work in Orono, hence was unfaaiillar with the Orono building codes. Although we have been residents of Orono for twenty one years, and had always secured the necessary permits for any construction improveisents involving plumbing and electrical and any additions we made on our former residence, we did not thinK it would be necessary to secure a permit to repair a structure that had existed for twenty two years. In fact, in Mkine the repairs Mr. Schrempp brought the railings up to code by raising them to the proper height and 6 board width IPreviously the railing was open and unsafe and in protruded at the top an additional 1.5 feet toward the lake. Since we feel that our not securing a permit and seeking a variance was an innocent mistake, we would like to request that you waive the $175.00 penalty which was imposed. Very truly yours. •j Oeorge w. Kalweit Katherine H. Kalweit ■ "4 \ ■ • JS/ •PNOM NO.mo I uNims Nm t4 vt / OwiMriMNa Tfjrfu^ / i z.Cor^luX^- r .,•- ‘ ' * fc. Tw«^ » r«4*^4£ijfl 1^ / V Mt Vv PUjfkJ^'^rf Ty\ <fA-^i^jfe€S>opi ^jum y; 944134 i-j ?V il4KE-i. PcIiUc Sunloc Stniclurcs. Public service struefures, m- l« but not limited to buildings such as tolcphone exchange stations, ___________ e«foftrknc* stations._____ or pressure regulating stations, wells, and pumping stations. ilMUt^ lift stations and electrical power substations, provided bunding shall be located within 50 feet from *v;iua te an^R** DIatrict. Prior to granting such permit it shall be found tho ardritectural design of service structui-cs is compatible to the mlgbb^nnrt In which It is to be located and thus will promote the gen* wolfars. f{ flgOT, Greenhouses. Commercial greenhouses provided all outside ttorsgs If fenced in such a manner so as to screen the stored material fMB view tidicn observed from the public street or an adjoining lot. Recreation Areas. Private gun clubs, archery ranges, rid- ■ frig stabW, ski slldct. provided the area is fenced and no pert of the prin- i ‘ use is less than one hundred feet from any lot line. Garit llotsies. Guest houses, accctsoiy sti-ucturc.s and uara other than those listed as permitted. S4.03S* Plmucd Bcskicniial J)cvcloji!ncat. Limited to detached ^ family dwelUngs only. - " - • ^ f .'<1 . j ■' ti X> ^ '9lJKll. ConmnuiltjrSlom. ' * J 9i.03d. B-IA; hxxxmwy Within any ”R-1A" One Faimb llff riiatrift, no accessory structure or use of land shall bo permitted ex- iiilliiif iM or more of ths following uses: Gongeo. 'Is- iUKfc rosto. etc. Private swimming pool, tenais courts, and pad illllitah •nv.-* 1-1*68 >1. i'J: ■ : s 1 * * 4 - ^ ^ '•.r,v • ■■ # r' • • - f > ••* i{fv\ * '‘ '^*. • " ^ K ^J ■ .4> *»> .*■>'w * • . * n • * ’ n» . « .',**•• »•<* '• • usoujnoir so. - •• r 1 *A lESOtOTli *V V"^ ■' • •f.. ..r* M3..;.: • -V r Kmarmi tsi piilxmuuit nkrx^ JANES LAHUaCB 1330 SIXTH AVENUE NOETB « $ ♦ " -f ! r> *, •• r .• 1 BFi-V’V/; -PV%7* feiC,-;*, if' .V V* y^mr UmiFAS, th. city of Oreoo la a ——nnrji^, and aalattas ».d« tS U« of tS SJ?TS WoSSS rv'^S.;-» :•'/'■ .#• - . V Sva^*-*^. *1 IflIEXEAS, th# City Council of the City of Opiimo *111^10 .▼loloB and aapeie oyataa ragolationa for,the ord«rl7 lafa davalopoMnt of land within the Clrr:.anii^ •« *g^ ^ > V ' HBtSSAS, the Flaonlng CooBlaaloD and City rniiifitf^hw tha application for a aid>diviaion plat for m HOW, THEkEfOIX, BE IT EESOLVED, that baaod opoo «srs.“«s:j5 aar^riiTS'.ts 3%:^ City of Orono haraby approvaa tha pral Inina .:y plat for Jdnaa' Lawranca with tha following ehangaa and raqulronanta and cooditiona: a t- < ‘H nttn ftri 4yf-^/i 4 V MZ a' aa^ Dtalna(3^« plana, aaaementa, cul-da-aac location, croalon control and •tract gradlcnca shall b« approved by the City Engineer. Drainage plans and erosion control aaasurea shall be approved by the Mixmehaha Creek Uatershad Diatrict. ^•*^Accaas shall be by a private road developed within a 50 ft. wide right-of-way with an underlying access easement dedicated to the City and with the location approved by the Hennepin Cotasty Public^' Vorka Department. •^The Douglas Dayton subdivision shall first be , finally approved and • receipt of recording delivarr^ to the City. 5.^^The new division shall consist of 6 lots (Lota I, 2, 3 and 4 coablned, 5 and 6 co^ined, 7 and 8 as shown on the revised 11-30-77 proposal). 6^P\irthei coobinatlon of Lots 1 and 2 shall be required If the applicant falls to satisfy the City Bigineer with satisfactory septic system site evaluatlca for said lots. 7. The applicant shall execute e 30 ft. wide flow-ge end conserveclon easement along the exls*.lna Holy Name Cr .k. 0^9^“ The applicant shsl^execute and deliver a road and urMltles easeeMtnt, s dgvelnp<f^r| ^^|r»i>tiM!>nt. and e hcaaowner's association agreement, articles of . Incorporation and/or by-laws. W ^- ■ 8 IVm K V *\ ^ •mi , \ J i> m^i .;y ®r,^tiiraouTnoii5Am^^ •\w,S&hb put bn jAacixwooi.py’.Jpf/Oro«»'^4#^i^ f st«c«>f HiimMbe# Cl|C3r;CounclP.o£:'th«;Clt3r: ofilim l^Mt^^vrAthb brd«rlT» cconeaie*and . . ..> >i si^rr^m^-. '.'■ -. -. . ' ...' [litiMfvisloci plat t by J ,iimA8 NfIi __ 'b tlont of • eb^^City^/inoludliig Lavrancat-th*-aubdlvidai :!3fc ' ^ ■ Cosplatioo o^allVtha. raqultaBianta^of; Dadlcatlon of accaaa aaaananta' uadarl yiiif privata>roada:? • ^Dadlcation o£. opaa apaoa and floaaga eonaacpatioaraaa *r*l i Paynant of a park dedlcatloa faa of x' <r :;i.* '*'-■. ^tBOIf, THEIEPORE, BE IT lESOLm, Chat tba City. Couneir of ^•jf-Af Vr''>/ ^r-*; Orooa hareby approvea tha plac of TAHCLEWOOD, Rannapin County aubjact to cha foLlovrlng condlciona:,^,K. 4'‘.",i. 'r « *1. -W 4.^ 1. Exacution of a davalopar'a agraeaenc for road Inatallatlon. 2. Tha aforaaald plat shall ba filed with tha Hcxmapln County.laooqtdar*s« Office on or bafora Saptesd>er 13, 1978, togathar with a cartlf|.ad^<^ original copy of this Raaolution, and axaeutad coplas of thmnoo^* utilltlas easaaMmt docuisanc, open space and flowaga cooaarvatlcm,^y ^ aaaanant, and protactlva covenants Including a clausa assigning ' ■alntanancs responsibilities for tha private road. 3. Tha private road, Outlot A, shall ha herctaftar knoim as ^.snglawnnd^^jT<^ The approval granted by this Resolution 'shall explra'^d^fCtibol!pljQi^|i8||5PH|^|p^ bean filed by tha date specified above. In that.^avant, it wlll^b# to file a new application with che Ctcv of Orono for subdivision Ostsd this 13 day of ^pr 11 L^<dun [llLi I’Ham B. Van Nast, Kbyor ATTEST / / Uaic#r Ry<^lidm»on, Clerk AJfni? .gtrator ::v,„M-' ■■"‘‘‘^ar. ••.S' •;. I » *;fex fc;--:«;: »#*?■ !^'*5-1^1 iv,.,^ '•u ;./■' •,1:11; ^ ,.:'>^v. • 'V' ' '" 1>.‘' ' ^ ' ;’ %-r'u:f' /'•■'• !|:l^%‘t.'iffc »■ msr-'‘^ .!■■ ■pp.iWsi;:'!''- ■''*'■ » ■ •r v;: V ’■ > ■ I- m<^- S'I'i--. l.>- »V,.%A "•%’V "V.''D fOt rtoNt DATBt Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Stephen Weckman, On-Site System Manager July 14, 1992 lUKYs Subdivision #1749, Jim Lawerence - Septic Review I have reviewed the proposed septic system testing and design for this property and would make the following comments. LOT 1 This lot has an existing residence with an on-site sewage traatment system. The system is listed as a substandard system which includes two 800 gallon concrete block septic tanks and approximately 300 s.f. of drain field trenches. The septic •ysten was installed in 1960 and no problems have been noted to date. Soil testing has been provided indicating alternate drainfield site suitable for a four bedroom and a one bedroom guest house. Specific septic system details are included below: Depth of seasonal saturation (mottling) is 1', requiring a mound. Slope is 0%. The percolation rate averages 8.1 minutes per inch at 12 inches. Topographic location and site drainage is adequate. All setbacks meet city code. LDT 2 Soil testing and septic design have bee.i approved for a five limdroom home including primary and alternate drainfield sites, •oth sites meet HPCA rules Chapter 7080 as well as Orono City Code Section 12.30 requirements. Specific septic system details are included below: Depth of seasonal saturation (mottling) is I’ to 2' for both priflkary and alternate drainfield sites. SXopm at the primary and alternate drainfield sites is 3% and 3% respectively. Percolation rates average 8.5 minutes per Inch at 12 inches. ■‘1 '• •' • ir imtoiii %' 8«ptic Review - §1749 July 14, 1992 tag* 2 of 2 Mf^. mmm^ 'W ■.4; Both sites require mound drainfields. Topographic location and site drainage is adequate. All set backs meet city code. •••Hote that the alternate drainfield site lies directly « ■ ____j________^4a»A G««^ the access road and the primary drainfield site. Snow fencing must be placed around the alternate drainfield site prior ' ^ ^ ^ t M m A_______________1 A, ^ ^ y.nna^v>il,«^4/>nSmbWAOW •M»»V W« ------------------------------------------- ^ *. A.t^^to issuance of a buidling permit to assure that construction SOtieities for both the house and the primary drainfield do not oompeet this site. ■% 1 mmm'W ■#' 4i ’%v.wMm H #i\3% ^ - -v; &M>*y - -V m 1 ■■* ;A n.0 i. •i :■ > -V ti»»- - i'-:' ^.ii. l»: iis L. S€SV!> •■J > . byr-'v4':. ,1. \ > ^.■ i??- ' ■ eW ?<:u?i: ;4 ’. ■‘'T. iis^-Wv iim :'W; ■ "ifr'" fe«-r i||p’ :«4if" ■/ " ^. r'v mm iHV'iiit ■•‘I ■ «■!■'. ....... .^"4:; is *i ^ 58%”- IP!t*i« I I I-* ■J^: N-i'-*;^.1 F' 'M ■;m^m*.. ,?i aiar.ik'^ • •'•■'■.■ ’>.. ,.? , .._S,« ilM IHi mill yii ? i!ll ist ^ »afl ^ s >1 IS I S! \ -<l=M S SiuK*o g _ gt 2 n o H M ffl iS®S i J-i? I m w o rt ~ 8 8“= 8 o 1/* c/ \» < mrf f- e e *y * 5*1 iii^r I- H H ^ S 8)m cl 8 I *|8'la5 r-» VI 2or* X ViHi -< m o M 3 — • v>i o m X *“i|s 8“ M Ssii *T‘ IPI|-|S ^ m m e ^8 ^ M M M 9 Vli < rvUi v« 8 Vi r- M ^ ^ O 2Q i|» r: C M OMiyr ^ 5 SfSa..„i iSilsZ Mi 8HI iJi V« Mi♦* fii iflli!r- it M *4 # 8 8s» iSii Ml : s 8 S fia ii|ihi ESSSI’S S ""iss”*? 2S SS§? _ < < » W sISSbs 8 SS8<*S8iai*S *ix*s£iMlS isris «- 88 n n I: §§»=ii 2*® 28 ommiZ I 8 8 8 ? 5 i> I ■ri-. •)«.># '.Wm^.-.......imr ■ mif^ ' Pi&k« w ls:^7... V- • : j t. ,-• ■ li “ "'''r ^ gjTt. ■ l»i.VA«- «• g„- ■ ,•/> |a#i>i''^; -^*i:-^:.......... A • • y,-..y iiliil'ffe- .<• .. m -v'. m^is. .v-:-''^/ ■* -v'' tfts. ■i:*is'^ •f-;. ■_ * *: 1 5 ^ ■» 'V' - I ;fc-.#‘Ute^'-i%fj.st *'v. ■■•W'WM^v Immm "*- “i®'sS^' ,p H17/I^ V M r 4t Mr •<■• f‘(. ;<^.'f‘V ®r ’ A^lll^. . -<1s ;.i<; 1 - ■I -■ 't ’ - rr-i^' - "t^ ■ • ■—t? • ;j^r; Slt« A4dr«ss ) •» ^IBDIVISION APFLICATIOM LOCAnON , A^Al .--■:M9^1 1 /5^ frop«rty Identification Niimber (P. I. D.)3"L Hoi3 fUasa check one - Property abstract or 2(y-n^- 'Z-^ torrens? Hktach le^fal description to application jUiliXCftMT L IMuse V _ Addresss ir i^-k, -f; Phone (home) _ Phone (work) Cif different than applicant) Hene _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (home) Phone (work) -;<i h^- rV- Addresst , .—r (ettaoh list ir more tnan one) City:Zip: ^ BXmMG LAW on Ndaber of Tax Parcels 4 1 i»Sit' Development Sise M. i ■MS a., (check) pill' ■•s-H . ■ ■ Acres ory .and „ ™ Acres Wet Land a^.Vs.i-vwv^ Acres Total, all parcels ol J£^ 2?'^ CHECK Hi- 375 m ^ Residential; no. of unitm£L/J^T-/f^A YW other (specity)___^i*SUIIM^J^/,; u ■: - V Present zoning District m tA- ‘W'% Of, %H- -.fe »'•% .■■?S '''V, 1^ Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buj.lding site?) Subdivision for New Building Sites Humber of Building Sites: r'lr« % Existing Units Mew Units Total Units mi s So ■f mr% W--* Proposed Gross Density: mAimum Lot Si%ei # Pre^oswS Use: (check) Units per Acres Sq Feet Dry Bulldable Land Residential Other (specify) ■t Ls\ . ^mm V-. -i^vr m ■t?' ■: ■■ rr-fwv*T -'mnm ' -i'’'MKI86ARY FOR CCfIPLBTB PRBLIMIIIARY APPLICATIOH m rJi' CMplRt«d A|>pIication Form WtSl i. S'J.I' ^|llp^sH£3?‘/oStFJFf aTo“ S" t As an sddsndum to this application# plaase attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. I^Ftifioation by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is lata. ^ . jm Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- - - - - - - - - - - - - ii*""Faymant of fees (park fees# filing fee# sewer and water assessments). t& lionad Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. ^ ^tle opinion I.K BeeaMBta# covenants# etc. Oevelopers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Bertifieation by Zoning Department that Pinal Plat Application is ccanplete. lOnillf Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __— Date- - - - - - S^^ Flan Review (Class X# II & III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement $200.00 300.00 f/'f »■trelininery Review (Class l « ii Subdivision)300.00 IIP FreXiminary Review (Class III & all non-residential)325.00 4. 25.00/Lotm ■a t:M Final Plat Review (Class III) a(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 175.00 m Renewal of Preliad.nary Subdivision Application Renewal of Final Subdivision Application 150.00 100.00 aMslicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or iMieted by the Zoning Administrator# City Engineer# City Attorney# annieg C5oeaUlasion and Council necessary to process this application and afreea to pay all additional feen established by ordinance. likUAt'. •IvtmtJtHrz •mmc'S Date Date ilieeet meat have all submittals into the city offices 25 days before t^ IMaine Ceemiaaion Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the isd Memday of each month. Applicants must be present at all schedul^ IdFiev meat til tis of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is tRRRble attend a scheduled meeting# please make arrangements to have an iMMdlMPiaed agent attend in your place and to advise the Bui Iding a Zoning ^ change prior to the meeting. ■ lea a ■? ------..................■"V t'5 .W0MH: ^ d -A:^v A KB8OL0TI0II GRAITflNG psxLumauiT approval op a TWO-LOT PLAT LOCATED AT 1550 8IXTB AVBTOB WORTH PILE WO. 1749 ffif* fc WHBRBAHf Jam«8 P. Lawrenc« (hereinafter "the applicant*) on June 24, 1992 filed a formal subdivision application with the City for Approval of a two-lot residential plat of property legally described AS Lot 4f Block 1, Tanglewood, Hennepin County, Minnesota, (hereinafter *the property"); and pi«. I '■ i - M ■ WHEREAS, after due publi'ihed and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statues 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning AAd. Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Cosimission held a public hearing on July 20, 1992 at whicli times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon} and mOHMIAS, at their regular meeting held on August 10, 1992, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application olf Jams P. Lawrence, noting the following findings of factt 1.The property is located within the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. k-2e Th« property contains a total of approxinately 5.53 acras with a man«*made pond at approximately .25 acre in areas m.' ■ “■ -iU- , fm-.. t 3.The proposed plat contains 2 lots each exceeding the 2 acre minimum lot area requirement as follows: ■r'&v I® Lot 1 “ 4.42 acres (excluding .25 acres of man-made pond) Lot 2 • 2.13 dry acres 4. Smi ■ 3^- Per Stephen Weckman's memo dated July 14, 1992, both sites have been found to h've adequate and suitable area for on site septic development. Both sites will require mound drainfields. Page 1 of 4 .mf 0^- ■A pi'UiA.;, m-‘^ ■ V 5. r^ %^- CTv'i. il : *\ .:- 4- ■ * "v -, »; ^?^V; ■ V%T section 10.56, Subd. 16 (C) (1), all existing structures on Lot 1 aeet the required 100* setback from the protected tributary. The existing septic system on Lot 1 and proposed new septic systems meet the required 75* setback from the protected tributary. «•Per Section 10.56, Subd. 8 (B) and Subd. 16 (L), all new construction will be subject to the new setback standards for shoreland areas and all areas within 300* of the tributary are subject to the appropriate hardcover controls. iM- ■OWf TBBIBFOKB Ml I'T RK80LVBD, that based upon either one or More of the findings noted aoove, the City Council '•f the City of OroBO hereby approves the prelisiinary plat for James ?. Lawrence per the survey dated June 24, 1992, revised July 13, 1992, by Mark S. Qronberg of Coffin and Gronberg, Inc., subject to the following oonditions t V M 1. ’■-i ■ Applicant to grant a drainage easement over the pond on Lot 1. fc*-2e Prior to final plat app..o/al, subdivider shall provide written documentation confirming that Lot 2 will be governed by all current covenants and agreements involving road maintenance and maintenance of other shared improvements for the Tanglewood Plat. 3. ill Prior to the issuance of a building permit for new construction on Lot 2, the alternate drainfield site must be staked and protected prior to any land alterations on the property. 4.Access to Lot 1 shall remain via Tract E of RLS #1418 and access to Lot 2 shall be via Tanglewood Road. Future owner of Lot 2 must obtain a permit from the Public Works Director for the installation of a curb cut onto Tanglewood Road. 5.Lot 1 is classified as a through lot. Owner is hereby advised that a conditional use permit is required for the construction of all future accessory structures. Pa^ 2 of 4 i?s- i 1 T- ' ' i', ’J 'f -.’' fM'J^':> ,pii-ft#''Kfei, y-64 Applicant shall apply for a conditional use permit to permit the continued use of the secondary residence on Lot 1 for guest house use. PINAL PLAT SUBMITTALS The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month: &!>■'it,’-;'- •' 1.RECORD PLAT drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to l"e200'. Drawing to include: |:4;55VV*A.Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Mark S. Qronberg of Coffin and Gronberg» Inc. dated June 24, 1992, revised July 13, 1992. PSS|.'teg/^ : ' B.Dedication of "drainage and utiliry easements” 10* wide along all perimeter property lines and 5* each side of internal property lines. C.Dedication of a drainage easement over the pond area within Lot 1 as shown within plat drawings. 2. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required: A.Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other docusMnts affected by such interest. B.The applicant must provide certified copies of recorded easements currently affecting the property »1 i C.Signed and executed Drainage basement document for the drainage easement over the pond within Lot 1 (see sample enclosed). Legal description may read as follows I #'iir K> "shown as the drainage easement within Lot 1, ____plat name____, Hennepin County, Minnesota ”. Page 3 of 4 'i ...j :-V?Tr.-T;. ; '/;■» .^ >1' , «iip.:.; VA-*\. %■. i ’ ■, &■:*"“» ■- -<•' ti-^i D. % ■-'*: %■ Written documentation that proposed Lot 2 shall share in the maintenance of road and all other shared improvements within the Tanglewood plat. This should also include Lot 2's share Tanglewood Road. in the ownership of mm:. ife' 3. FEES TO BE PAIDs Total Due $375.00* A. ‘•V,; ■f- B. Final plat fee ■ $175.00 Legal review and filing fees of $200.00 m: •c. ■40^- ‘‘sM -M Park dedication fee shall be determined by the City Asaeasor upon approval of the preliminary plat by the Council. The City's Park Commission has reviewed the subdivision and will accept cash in lieu of a dedication of park lands. Applicant will be advised of the park dedication fee amount as soon as the City Assessor has cosqpleted his evaluation. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono* Minnesota Hi a regular meeting held this 10th day of August^ 1992. I||;ATfiiTt BeretliF N. HaTlin, city Clerk Barbara A.Peterson*Mayor H ilBfB OF WimBBOTA ) wm.-) ss. Rtf,®eoiniff OF maniBPiii ) ^mc r- mm’ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this iOtll day of August* 1992* by Barbara A. Peterson and Dorothy M. Baiiln* Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono* a Minnesota munioipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of tA# City. Notary Public Page 4 of 4 If m if- - -L«it, 1 .1 li i C' 1 IP*®-#*■ ■' '■ iA:'. »■ i-■0<■■ -isi'S Sf Sbi cChairman Kelley and Planning Conunission MembMil^Hayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator r,»'i'- .''I.,-■_■'■ .I,,';, . , • k*0!- Jeanne A. Habusth, Building ft Zoning Admi July 16, 1992 iM^a^ C •1749 JaiMS F. Lawrence, 1550 Sixth Avenue North Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing j P ImrtiMftt Ordiamaoes Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C-*l) - Setbacks from protected tributaries. A. Structural (unsewered) Required - 100* Note all structures on developed Lot 1 meet the required structural setback ^1 ilr -W^ i # a ■mm- Septic Retired • 75* Oa^Site Septic Manager confirms existing septic s^^tem meets the required 75* setback from the protected tributary •’.i. Tv •! Secticm 10.56, Subdivision 8 (B) and Subdivision 16 (L) -> Review ■ahibit G. Protected area adjacent to the tributary has been designated and the hardcover areas defined. I J. '■mi m Chapter II - subdivision is a Class III. iiet feklsilS fehT- Mom '■ >M. ^V. I ■• '. ^ r^’ ';Va’. r‘ ■ :.%:■ .mSx^'r A o Application B • Property owners List C - Piet Hep D - Meckeea Nsso B * 1-2 Septic Site Plans P • Preliminary Plan (8 - Protected Tributary Setback and Hardcover Standard H - BLS tlOli X - Resolution #866 Preliminary Plat for Tanglewood J - Resolutioe 1896 Pinal PIit for Tanglewood K - Road Section - Tanglewood t “ Tanclswood Plat M - 1967 toning Code N - Building Permit #1940 i': • ‘pi^ai imM- '■*toning Pil« 11749 July 16, 1992 fftg« 2 lerlptioB of Roquost M',-- Tho applicant proposes the division of Lot 4, Tanglewood into two parcals. Lot 1, the developed lot shall continue to achieve access via Tract B of RLS #1418. The owner of Lot 4 has never developed an ac<7«S8 off of Tanglewood Road. Lot 1 will remain a through lot. All RR-IB area and setback standards have been satisfied for the existing structures on proposed Lot 1. All existing structures and septic drsinfield area neat the required setback of the shoreland district. Baeh of the lots neet the required width of 200* at the rear of the front street setback of 50'. As already noted above. Lot 2 will aehleTS access via Tanglewood and will be subject to all the private eovenants currently in effect. The new curb cut or access at Tanglewood will require approval of the Public Works Director. Review Exhibits D and E 1-2. Weckman's memo confirms that each g£te has adequate area for development of conforming on-site septic systeas• Staff has included the road section for Tanglewood and the prelininary and final subdivision resolutions granting approval of the plat (Inhibits I, J and K). Note that in 1978 the paving of private Sdads was not required. Portions of the road have been paved by l^fidiiVldual property owners. As the enclosed resolutions note, there asa private covenants for maintenarce purposes in place and the City had obtained the necessary access and utility easements over the road aatiot. Let 1 will neet the area requirements for a guest house use a _______^ I ^ 1 siAv»vjraa#g r>Lot 1 is shown at 4.42 acre. The guest house is currently served by %il# •xlating ••ptic system that aarvea the reaidence ai*i alternate septic testing confirms that the guest house will continue to be ssrved by a shared system. In reviewing the records (Exhibits M and R), staff notes that the guest house was constructed in 1967 and the enrrent residenos in i960. The code at that time wuld have required a CMSnditional use permit for a guest house. Staff is not- clear as to ths ralevance of the information written out on buildinc, permit for gmost hssise as RL8 #1410 was not approved until 1978. At any rate, no subdivision would have had an impact on the guest house use because of its proximity to the principal structure. S^-aff should have required a conditional use permit. The Planning Commission must make a rocommeodation concerning the need for applicant to file a current conditional use permit for the guest house. The pond on Lot 1 has existed on the property for many years and wna probably installed by the original owner. In the past; the City has always asked for a drainage easement over the defined or existing ratantion areas. Staff would recommend that *^he City obtain a drainago easeswnt over the pond area. ill: SrSiw.;:;'., P ■ f;;;,'.'•*'f-i .r ! V■,vwrV'.i. ,v lig $’ Wi- !?■ m- W>-. lV:?.-i.li l|-- --V \ . ■•. Ki W ‘lf>^m-' il'-y'iif <;i.'-' -V • 1 ' mr Wi V'ii'■ * W 'A. ‘ tV ; i-;-. • ,•■ ' A ^:'' ; :V H '■’' U'^ IP'' p|.^' 'life .•V Zoning Pile #1749 July 16, 1992 Page 3 Staff Ke ndation To recomnend approval of the two lot subdi.ision of Lot 4, Tanglewood, finding all standards of the Rk ID zoning district, Shoreland Regulations and subdivisi.'n regulations of the City have been met by the subdivider. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for new construction on Lot 2, the alternate drainfield site must be staked and protected prior to any land alterations on the property. 2. City to acquire a drainage easement over the pond on Lot 1 Subdivid'^r to dedicate 10' wide drainage and utility easement along the perimeter boundaries of the properties if not already dedicated within the Tanglewcod Plat and a 5' wide drainage easement along the newly defined intericr lot line between Lots 1 and 2. Access to Lot 1 shall remain via Tract E of RLS #1418 and access to Let 2 shall be via Tanglew:>od Road, The future owner ot Lot ? muit obtain a permit from the Public Works Director for he installation of a curb cut onto private road. Prior to final plat approval, subdivider shall provide written documen ation that Lot 2 will be governed by all current covenants and agreements involving road maintenance, etc. for the Tang^ewood Plat. Lot 1 la classiflec as a through lot. Owner is advised that a conditional use ptrmit is required for the construction of all accessory struct.*res. Planning Conaisslon s.ould make a recommendation concerning .he need for a current conditional use permit for guest house use. S?.s. .. % ( . .f P ,. IW I . . II III f.m ^"iK^i ..m 'm-■v.v^V,v.-toning File *1749 August 5, 1992 Fngo 4Mdltionnl CooBenta and Planning CoaBiaalon Re ndation V The Planning Commission unanimously concurred that applicant file for a separate conditional use permit if secondary residential structure on proposed Lot 1 was to ccr^tinue to be used as a guest house. Planning Commission agreed that this roguest is consistent with previous recommendations of the City St the time a property was to be subdivided. Mr. Lawrence has already filed for a conditional use permit to be reviewed at the Planning Commission meeting of August 17th. L' The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of thS preliminary two~lot subdivision for James P. Lawrence for the property located at 1550 sixth Avenue North. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions set forth by the Planning Commission in their approval roconnendstion . v"'- 1 i.- ..’I (.Isw I® :.- ■ '-V. ■ • ' . : -I *• '• Pi;#. W-- 'M ■ ■Vi A ■•■ 0% ■ rm T .'v-k. h':•« • ''f ■■A'' ■^4' 't'.' -A... M ■SURVB V” / ^ f V 4 f •.* # -A1i I«» • *' - f R'a * - V . \ V?/' h •'•'i7*4 ' . •V . • iI-r,.•vv i % * ^.f/ v-^ 't 5^ / » ■ • AJOl<,v -‘ G/y/^r' ■' ' ^ t. '7 ^r', .f>u -.v/y-i.' *'*•' r'4 r '0‘;.v J • • j'. • ' ^ OW * V*^»f •.*. ..-Y ' r ^ ^ .v' : t .'»v' t*’i - f'* - ?^y5{<Ti. • Ifctlv/ >>' ' f* ?♦ ‘ f. V f , #* > •' ^7K% rg *r ^ « I '' #' *i iS-Vi a'SfcSaif^.V:' ??’v . V# /-■> • I •m ^ •• .li- 4u K *tr*r Mii V ^*** •% 'iji# XT.-\ a^nTi.'•'-WU » f r**^*Ml * ^ *',;'Ll,'.'.' ^?»'"* » t*|l*.'. jj'. *y,, * T ,t'«»- v;; v^'4/riiiji^^ s siron > ^ ou«o * -a 'i• r^-' T1 4: •>! ; r;»y'J^.'. hT'OfNOTf sl;‘o«i«cnoH ’or suhtacc rtow/fi^r.f"7Avocf«Tft4o3groio ftivAtw* •oqioTfiifw*5pif oi»n:tv«fiO0 .. ; :',v^m^seo&ILCVATiOM».«, ;i. f* • l‘V t - I >1 . * -M ^ # V ■ , # _•x' * NO ;kl£iil^iii»Yir,ciji VF yat ^ i s. suiTw ey '. , ^ ^^lAH'iiSiipi GIHPQ w w xa • p» gp ^ « CO' at/ r Ji VW*.-“"o«.Mt ^DIRECT. SUPERVISION As a >t‘a iOULr'm-;:3YtREC i.an f^^RVEYOt^qwDIR TXi UWa or Tme ' .STATS Of HIKNfSOTA KIM:A. RCAUME 5 (j i-i r i t \ y. !4?: ri' \mr\^3 f M l i^oiiw vm 01/ t « «r -^\ 'v*' f! 9 "* * V ^ "I« iS" ^1 Q CM P* <1 »!5 rirn ^ t>:\^ ^ V^a:\ >J>Si > "‘LXk ‘ 4.. 11\ r: V f-1 rj i: . f t '■/ ',»^N X-llv .•*1^ ■ v» ri V- jt- n \ ‘4 ' » C ic^ rv-;; I? V xtw —^ ^ «i r\ '*. *. t> v%»- i / -* II ta- ’.yX, ;S ,-] !:z;:v:;'tlv-:V tf' irr=-xjzr--:;w»'' t \*‘ ’ ' • ** 1 • f ■ c . I, If: P P aiffiCf r-®6j m r: •zpti'n i #• m amm isK . kv F- •I f^:. ■ . .o> ->^ <• >':J.r. : v,r. l:v ^3’’ ■ iW F^f-V V- t‘ V'■■•W; • tv i.Ef" ■ #• M'm p- Tr-- .. ■ A-::^- ^-rr.,v^,L- To:%,'jChairman Kelley and Planning Commianion Meirshers Mayor Peterson and City Council ^ ^O q Ron Moorse^ City Administrator ^•< (7 Jeanne A, Mabusth# Building & Zoning AdministratorFrom: Date:August 3, 1992 % 9 Subjact:#1748 Bob Hovland, 1245 North Arm Drive - Conditional Use Permi t/V .. r i a nee - Request to be referred Back to Planning Commission for further review Mr. and Mrs. Hovland have requested that the above referenced application be referred back to the Planning Commission for further review. At the July 20th meeting of the Planning Conanissionf the application as originally proposed was recommenr td for unaimous denial (refer to enclosed site plan). The applicant proposes to meet with staff to discuss an amendment tnat would minimize the intensity of variances sought with current improvement proposal. Re datlon To recommend that Application #1748 for Robert and Rita Hovland be referred back to the Planning Commission for further review of an amended plan. Ayes, ______ Nays. Isv r q t ; f 1 r r c Of tj9V f ' for r»40HAS ^ lOwf.IN lO^S * • ^ ‘ ’ * )H!i9£ M••f N^|£P f N c-’j*^ ' ^ M • V*» f'1; ♦ • &■ ♦ - • f - -1 BfeiL ’ ■ ■ » Wf 1 H* * % s ► <» ' * ' ^ f 4 n fi i' pp M^mn* *» ♦♦ ^ «< • OA D F" H—— ^;--' ;ir. ; ■-■ A‘/> i^Yvr: iv. VfL r’’*!'- •?b:;« M -^:-. I I k « t mt • .• • H •! f H * ?»»»•• 'f M *t <*• "-1 O. V •« # «» ' • 1 • ,,• A vY\ ,--A-(V.:; -;f • / i / / ; / /• f.::: ^ ' / / vU*> Hic<i»*.q. 2 *m4 *n« S«»fa < f « i I f 11 ir vAr I* # I » I 0 11 •• #•- k fi' ^ 0««^ #1 / 4 6 •*« »*t '# ^ r 4—-‘ISLErr♦'^SSS^ “ «0,l4KMIwk’k**«(«HJ*i ui' * C^'i.ivkUWMWtt’k.vk-^.^vv < lLt5aJ^A<ll'y^mWm z-.::—mm C064y^ HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET_ icTBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' ("TwSO^ 250-500' 500-10C0' E xisting Hardcover in Zone A. House •X,- Rl- %* M..:^B. Garage c. D piyewA y p;« mm 0.. Sidewalk 9t ■#-v* ■'■ li.; Jp ''^■ Jt e. Patio / Deck afcK :\a.rv - ■ sii ‘ « rrfyr F. Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN ir PLASTIC sweeting. 7KtM>4f f044df Kitm g. O ther *-*••:iti. A..-' ;R-AD '*; ,- vN, mm LENGTH WIDTH X _ 30. Z 2 y- ~ z r r. y ? 7 0. * j“L H V X !. - / jf. ^ ZiLLzjQ.7> 6 79. f X tr X r/. ? 0. s o . f o- ^ Total Hardcover in Zone Total Froperty Area in Zone 7/ 61 // f/S JL •m •B Jy S.F. •pi# • 0 . r • S.F . <• »•^ • r . „ S.F. 7 7/S.F . ^7/6 0 S.F. S.F. _ - . S * r # /;i C S.F. IT ro /J T S.F. /y?S.F . 2Z S.F. S.F. 9c S.F. Vi' 5 ^ 7 s Sfr^ zo -S.F. y- /S.F. 7 / >' S.F.01V^ • EtF n ^ *. jifeMi. jik’-../?.r4.ij.. . ...A.,____ot.:. /O /*> V 9y/o I '^'r-/t:— y V-' ■i ; ■ A;■. C ^ ^h }t A <HAnDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE oneX^/J^L' 7f-250' 250-500' 500-1CQO' Ekistimg Hardcover in Zone Z" .f ii.iifetiW'wte f##:' Rt' ;gi»u. #-.¥*■ m 8pfr ■■■iwm ,4S «!<.?• mIB |P?|nr ■ S-iS&iP "* ■ * 0 A. House •X _8 2 / / L^S.F, 1LENGTH WIDTH X .8 •S.F, X _S.F, • X .S.F, SC^ffAy /y. 3 X _A’ .n 4 / 7 6 S.F. B. Garage" ’_ m • X _S.F. c. Driveway _ X >8 '-/o S.F. _ X .a S.F. « • iD». Sidewalk -. X _a S.F . ':'V"i»A>'* - X _S.F. 2. C - X _y r /2 5-S.F. V Igi Patio/ % Dcck - X « • w ^7 cL>S.F. p. Landscape . - _ X _.y*fi7 S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN IT ._ X » •p**:.F. PLASTIC SHEET INa'«» X ^a S.F. • «• »• . X _a S.F. rrryj G. Other ^_ /^. / s 'P- t 9 .?■. z ? JLJ- - - - 5* Y /I --A2_ _ S.F. mm.Total Habscover ;h Zohe ^fr,- s.f. b»sft Total Fropirty A ria in Zcnp Jc»/v t s.f. ripift:-__-r 3 X 100 -/ 7 f Q n % m. * •. • • * .. 5 -m > -y I (w«) property Owners* Aclcn^led,e-ent For» fZvAUP M- Cl €Oe.ireii of -—!±i_--------------[print address] (print name (s)1 LA^A'iETTt: 4-Kes rsrnoosed improvement ->r proposed use of the kave reviewed the Pl»"* ^ ^ {.AgAvrTTg also referred to as Land Ose l^ipoptirty located at _2efL2f- Upplioatlon No j d.K.4- -xecuting this acknowledgement, I a™ , I (we) underatand ^ disapproval of the property or use lax*) not .-.sked to declare app ^ council^hat I (we) an (are) aware of 5:r.^:Uere»rp“”s^%%'th^^^^ proposed nei,hhor*s project or use l*IKpLires Council approval. property Owner R. 6 Date 1 (we) •■'il (print name(s)] aw. reviewed the plans for the proposed i"P-;“:",\rerr.rt?1i.“’*ani Z reperty located at ------------------------------- - pplieation Ho. )•' 1. ..••'i. HWO „■ n— I (we) understand that in *pp*o*tl"of^the*^^^ or use MVaerelT to confir. proposed neighbor*, project or use the sepraveaeot plane and that the prop Vtt^ttiree Council approval. Date property Owner Date Veofperty I.. 1-h. City in the review of U you have any iafonaatlon that ~y \o the Building a :^n,^"f-ffcV .riV.rt‘tr;.^yi%rt*or rVh/r/heduled «.ting date. U- tm. , mP"--" M^‘ *.a- IS}':;:■-» i^iv' Rk ■"' "' '1^'' ^ i|& ■" ‘.-■f- ■ PSI:^kls#’ Jl EP* :V[s'/ n,%'^ V"’ >■«! \ )Z/ May 27, 1992 Mr. Ralph D. Burgass, Jr 204 Inland Road Flyaouth, MN 55447 Daar Ralph I aa proposing a bsdrooB-storags addition to ny house at 2630 Meat Lafayette Road which will require a hardcover variance. I am encloaing a copy of the plan and plat shoving proposed addition together with Orono's "Adjacent Property Acknowledgment Form". ■i i X WQtiXd appreciate your signature on the enclosed fora and return in the enclosed envelope. Your signature does not iaply appUfoval or disapproval but merely that you received the notice.i .>v Sincerely, LYMAN LUMBER COMPANY Thomas P. Love TPLtjs Bnc. <i'’ %■ Adjacent Property Owners' AcVnowledgeaent Form A ^ A I (w«)of (^ C Cjy [print name(8)J (print address] ^ X. ^ .«« #nr the oroposed improvement or proposed use of the hav« taviwad the Pl*"* * ^ also referred to as Land Ose property located at —-- --- - -2- - -- Application No a t ^ that in executinc this acknowledgement, I (we) am 1 (w.) “"'\”V./lare approval or disapproval of the property or use <are) not asked . council that I (we) am (are) aware of but nerely to ““"“'"'“L ^hat^the proposed neighbor's project cr use the improvement plans and that tne pi^^v requires Council approval. J 2 A"' 9 ^operty Owner Date /22JV^ roperty Owner ■s~- 9 Date ------------ TiHiii^dress, US^ A'^ P /Tfc ^ P have reviewed the plans for the to as Land Oae property located at ^ c^.^/w.£Ti£— »1»° reran Application No I (we) underetand that in ‘or ’ute (ere) not aeked I (wa) am (are) aware of S: r.rrol.lU “Va^”s P-posed neighbor's project or ».. roqulres Council approval. jul i rty Owner V y Owner 2- O - ‘1 U Date If you have any information that may ‘^^^J^^to^"the*Bullding 6 I r ;- ': ■Adjacent Property Owners* Acknowledgement Form (we)^ yM AA/^'t *5> s t-J<rf=y^y£ Tj'^ (print name(s)](print address] uO-r t"! ®v ■ w 1 « the Droposed improvement or proposed use of the fK,V« r#vlew9d the ^A^^n^also referred to as Land Use ^ property located at - - -- - - - -- -— AppllcAtion Mo. ^ J m.t In executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am . I (we) understand that in disaooroval of the property or use (ere) not e.ked XTitv Council th^^^ <«e) am (are) aware of but aerely to confirm ^ ^ proposed neighbor's project or usethe improvement plans and that tne prop j requires Council approval. property Owne Date Property 0%mer Date I (we)g/v>> L y/wi of X C-3 (print name (s) 1 (print address] pi^opcr^y locjLtsd ^ -x—* ^l^llcation No. W:M ^ A in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am I (we) understand that in disaooroval of the property or use Cere) not asked to Citv Counci l^^that I (we) am (are) aware of but mereiy to *°L\j,at the proposed neighbor's project or usetho improvement plans and tnar tne f v ^aquiree Council approval. property Date •' I, you have »y “i^^ o th:*Bu7rdTn,i ^t^VaVt 10 d.% prior to the achedul^l ...tin, date. #174e ■'r I A ^ -'.», • -j* t •; . I ■r> ■'■^^ ■' > . •'■»«. ■* v:>- :it. .9‘^v lii^iaril jfc^n f •Mk. •V I ;SzS J9 P O » ■ y •f I ill i'li m VM r- ?si Oo c;{M H f-I SS5*-^28 r* g VI m p g I \M\M m vn f X o g iss Z rt Ifl M **=<4 •H M y m (IIu (M M (S 3 s StSSI* m (II ^r Q Q S M VI r- X S M M p M I S?*" o S5|i 3 ** ?833SS =“"S|sM X X O 1^ 8 -t>I ? oo (II Hm I b m ^ P ! mnf- i*. .■fci: My ■yidK m.u >(• f-:mm. i<: '}’y.- W. , ■ b:; . i: ;■ ^'.r- ' ir:;' •■ t: »■• --•?* -. ^r- '•• y -a;. -^,-:k1"’ ■ M- w . • - J-- r4y ■t: r.-’ -:iA r& J r:-. ©■ L • t^y--: JMi ^ ........ /,•’•/'W-J illy. Wm um- ,1 ■•*' ,w. fc:.. -^'ilife t:hi M m^:m fcrrf: ’"r. ^i: MM-^Sy.. (.Pn. ■■Ip: >• f .• .. -. < V,: H '■ > “ ' :P K: ,, '■ ■ ,yt^ .. . ■'. ::' • >. ■ ■ * CL6^'L>yk\£/\/Li 'A PiToposal is for bedrooo-storsge addition totaling not nors than 567 sq. ft. on the SW corner of existing residential structure. There 1® no way an addition could be constructed under the existing hard- cover ordinance. This causes a hardship. In order to improve the hardcover we would propose to reinove plastic sheeting of 740 sq. ft. and resove and relocate outside of hardcover zone a screened oacebo of 176 sq. ft. This would remove 916 sq. ft. from the hardcover zone thus there would be a net reduction of hardcover usage of 349 ft. in the 0-75 hardcover zone. Our topography indicates that much of the drainage from affected area is# was and will be away from directly draining to the lake. Drainage takes a somewhat circuitous route to the SW and then Sasterly to the lake. Existing structure was built in 1971-2 before existing ordinance was in effect. There have been no major structural alterations to the house since that time except for a kitchen remodel in 1985 which did not encroach beyond the existing building envelope.I fr’■^1 _1 u r l‘,'*>*l j';"^ ■•■' fee.!' it - ! ‘Kr'. !% tf t*- - - ^ *• ?:'.•’ V* p;:. ■If m •Vv; :• •• VK.- ■• m\- "UfK ■ P-fe'f W4t: «i- m / CITY or ORORO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 par each additional variance) Ranawal variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 Aftar-the-Pact Fees (Double application fee) #1 If ‘3 y /I nOPBRTY IMPORMATIOH Site Address X. 6. 5 c iv A-f=/Ky (T- /r, Property Idantif. Number (P.I.D.)■z. / . f / “I • i ^ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired ni^ (month/year) A I * W’ k. «i ‘. Vi r r >cc T'C* ^ W» • A ws» A W Vi 1 i0f^{do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. * W V. A ■ Wt • > ^ # t.- UCf\ >u •-r ,v, ^ • w'V-r , v^ w • un.' Present use of property: Soning District:_ _ _ _ _ X residential other (sped f^>^^a - ” w * »1 wA hia ♦^Uk»ai t M f UU - -w'CJ*V UW .i rr—jn??: C'ii. ■ L'5/ r"'- M- p® - ^ -■V ^ ffe- ■■ ■ tfr. ■'vi'.’- ■as.:: APPLXCAllT Name Phone (home) ^ ~7 < ^ ~J S ^ / Mc/so A*b *Phone (wor)c) "7 *4 oS M-v/ Address: 3.6»>o. /ZO city: g~Z--S/o/z_ zip: / (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: \w0^ DSSCRXfnOH OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Coat $ CC Describe request in detail: s^) — of it ^ O/ T-/c /t>_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ S.' %■ Ei.'. W VRBZAHdS m IRBD Lot Area Lot Width X Hardcover Lot Coverage Setback:Front Side Rear X Other (specify)_ _ _Stz ^ Average Lakcshoxe aOMaXP/DBSCailFTION or unusual PROPSRTT CONDITIONS . . L_ Describe undue hardship or practical difficuJty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements:_______ _________________C A/ryfg-^v}.£^-v r "'A '._________________________ lipmn■ '".s' ■ . ■•■ *■B ■IQI All (attach additional sheets if necessary)IXIUED SUBMITTALS of tho following information must be submitted by the application ■■■ - ________-f ___________ a '____ _______________________________• dlino onplotcd Application Form rtifiod Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 8-3271). at Map (obtained with property owners list). rtificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include rdcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy S^^xll" for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in ejcisting grade are proposed (provide one copy 8*j"xll"). §• \y^SIcetchea or plana of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%"xll'*). an addendum to this application, please attach a r:eparate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8> Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 9. She Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please feoieedber that your variance application is not conplete if the above iafoi»etioa hae not been incl«|ed. AmxcAar*8 szgbatdiue She applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff tiine not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses ihcorred in review of this application, and certifies that the information ifllppliad is true and correct to the best of his/her k.io\*ledge. 0 ^ P Applicant's Signature ^ If Date G 3-7 ' ______SIGHASimi fhe owner hereby ac)cowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, ageatSr Caaad.ssion members, and Council m<»ibers for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. T'lv.iG-'V-v-l,Oimer's Signature Date ‘-3 - f Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning ConoBission Meeting. Planning Conmission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants most be present at all scheduled aoetinf^ of the Planning Coasilssiaci and Council. If an applicant is _ _ _ to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an Mthoriaod agent attend in your place and to advise the Building * Zoning Odfics of this change prior to the meeting. ffi-v - .r-:. ■>.;f'-i?,!, m’. Kk s % ::L.'m. ; ■/ . • k-. ,|- ** V' ^ ■ ■ • a';’.;;.;. » f&:: i'Srf •imW: Mfi'i f-:fe':Lr. Ife W» ■y'r ■ ;sfe !-•'■!; • l^' |- Toi Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council ^ Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jy^ 5 IProas Dates Subject X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Jeanne A. Mabusth* Building f> Zoning Administrator ^ ^ • •■’.» July 9, 1992 #1746 Thomas and Margaret Lowe, 2630 West Lafayette Rd. - Variances - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances ~ 1.Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - Lakeshore setback variance required for proposed addition to existing residence. Allowed » 0 Existing « 16* Proposed * 38* Variance “ 37*or 49.3% 2.Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and 75-250* setback areas. - Hardcover variances within 0-75* A.0-75* setback area * 22,300 s.f. Allowed ■ 0 Existing per applicants' consultant » 3,993 s.f. or 17.9%. Existing as adjusted per staff's review * 4,387 s.f. or 19,6%* Proposed « 4,037.8 s.f. or 18.9% (addition of 566.8 s.f. or 2.5% of new structural hardcover with removal of 176 s.f. or .08% existing structural hardcover and 740 s.f. or 3.3% of non-structural hardcover) *Deck and patio shown at total area of 78 5 s.f., revised per staff review found at 1,179 s.f. Refer to Exhibit I. B. of IslilblM - 75-250* setback area ■ 31,900 s.f. Allowed •7, 975 s.f. or 25% Existing ■ 11,813 s.f. or 37% Proposed • 11,989 s.f. or 37.5% (if gazebo relocated rn 75- 250* area) m Iyj' A - Application Al- Applicants* Addendum B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map 0 ** neighbors' Acknowledgment Forms M - Hardcover Pact Sheets P - Survey G - Elevations 8 * Proposed Site Plan t - Staff Sketch -*k “Sfct- fi;^ Ipnin^. File #1746 July f» 1992 V«f • 2 . i i. ■'. fe-:OMoiriptloii of Roqnout «TiV !?■ »! Applicants propose a 26’x21'8" addition to the west and south ilda of the existing residence. Review Exhibits G and H. The addition will be a single story addition, continuing along existing roof line. Three-fourths of the house is located within the 75* setback area. Any grade level addition would involve lakeshore •etback and hardcover variances. The only portion of the existing residence located out of the 75-250' setback area is the attached oarage. Applicants claim if house is to be expanded and is to meet functional and aesthetic design goals, expansion must be at grade l,evel. Vertical expansion would have a negative impact on the architactual design of home. Is order to compensate for the 566.8 s.f. of additional structural hardcover with the proposed improvement, applicants will resK>ve 740 s.f. of landscape rock underlain with plastic and relocate s gasebo structure within the 75-250' setback area at 176 s.f. in srea. To relocate the gazebo within the 75-250' setback area will reciuire approval of a hardcover variance as set forth in the factual findings. Please review Exhibit A-1, Applicants' Addendum. Hardships are reviewed as follows: ■mm^ 1,Wt. 1. 5.-’ The only portions of the structure suitable for expansion are located completely within the 0-75' setback area. 3.Proposed improvement will result in a hardcover of 349 s.f. net reduction of siK' :>■3.Based on existing topography, the majority of drainage from structure drains to the southwest and then eventually east to the lake only after it has traveled over extensive grassed lawn area. 4.Sxistlng structure was built in 1971-2 before existing Shoreland Regulations were -n effect. There have been no major structural alterations to the house since that date except for remodeling wUhin existing building envelope. 5. E t f'p'.-'- .411 of the area of the property is located within the 0-75* setback area. ,r- -li’- ■ mm 5-: i'-. i ’f ■ 1. i:i ? ‘ I i I'?'.,,;- .<..!,;i Zoning File #1746 July 9, 1992 Page 3 Issues for Consideration A.Applicants propose .05% reduction in 0-75' setback area. Review Exhibits E and I. Are there other areas of existing improvements that can *^e removed? B.37% hardcover exists and 37.5% is proposed within the 75- 250' setback area. Are there areas of existing hardcover within the 75-250* setback area that can also be reduced? a) Removal of non-essential portions c' paved drive? b) 640 s.f. of landscape area underlain with plastic^ c) Paved walkways or other accessory improvements d) Others. Any condition of approval must include the request that all hardcover improvements scheduled for removal be completed prior to the footing inspection for new construction. Additional CoBBaents and Pl.mning Ccwnission Recommendation August S, 1992 The applicant advised that the screened porch structure originally planned to be relocated in the 75-250' setback area on the property would now be removed from the site. Applicant also owns Lot 13 to the immediate south of the subject property (review Exhibit C). Mr. Lowe had originally planned to relocate structure on Lot 13 but was advised that because property did not contain a principal structure, an accessory structure would not be allowed. As a result, hardcover within the 75-250' setback area remains at 37%. Planning Cotranission members could not accept the trade-cff of new structural hardcover for the removal of non-structura1 hardcover within the lakeshore protected area. Applicant advised that he would be willing to reduce hardcover within the 75-250* setback area but members advised this would still not minimize the Impact of the increase of structural hardcover within the 0-75' area. Members asked if Lots 12 and 13 could be legally combined thereby reducing the percentages of excess hardcover. Applicant advised that Lot 13 is an independent buildable lot and has been assessed for a sewer unit. Applicant asked if a lot line rearrangement would be an acceptable alternatnative but members advised because of the location of the tennis court within tne shared lot line, the lot line rearrangement would nave a negligible impact on the hardcover issue. Members strongly encouraged applicant to consider the porsibility of a legal lot combination based on existing comprehensive use of property. The majority of tl»o Planning Commissior members voted denial of the application as proposed based on the finding that hardships presented by applicant were not acceptable. The minority opinion felt the hardships stated by the applicant were acceptable and felt that additional reductions in hardcover within the 75-250' setback area would have an lmp.'*ct on the overall application. )^ ■- ;-k' .?■ ■» ;»'<i»>v' ■:rv 5‘:'t.'i'‘^'V ,/ I ■ ■ I'W •. U^‘.ViK::.-: fi' li;.:A-W £s'“. Kv >- i| i-'■ •■ > . V, Zoning File #1746 August 5, 1992 Page 4 ing additional exhibits f iaim, specifically the or layout as it relates to araj iiage pattern that will The applicant has advised that he w’ and information to support his hardsh architectural design of the house/ int the 0*75* setback area and the existinr resuiin the same after construction (revi w Exhibit F). Applicant has also advised that he would be willing to rer.ove the landscape areas underlain with plastic ar some 640 s.f. or P'^/ reducing hardcover within the 75*250* setback area to 11/1** s. the concret' e>*eas not connected with ..e 4 • there is somn 254 s.f. or .8% of non*ess >n^ia cumulative hardcover to 10/919 s.f. or j4.2% 2.8% within the 75*250* setback area. Appli further on additional removals in the setback a or 35% In reviewing ‘ : t*" - tennis court/ nert i areas reducing t al reduction of • n. f wish to comment ' a. Options of Action 1. Denial per Planning '!omroission recommendation/ OR 2. Approval as proposed. 3. Approve las amended by Council. Ooenell Action To provide staff with conceptual direction so that an appropriate resolution can be prepared for Council's formal action at their August 24th meeting. 1«• 1 I& 11 ■;.,V j*' 1 S?!5i;;?!’..^' '• ifeHrfe, "IV: m'm* f •■' ■1 yf. C ')«■. ,. m:f:'k. ¥' ■\<V\ '^''[b"Sf;;'V '■if'- ■' ii^..is ■L '^^t, WvV:,' -is' ■;4':.» Wki‘- I-■^' ■ Pv> f^t- ■j^N-•■;'■’• • ..4^. ^hiiiyiiAi MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETHELD JULY 27, 1992 ROLL ''Wo'’* the following mefnDlllsTh« Council met on the above date with present: Acting Mayor J. Diann Goetten, Counci I members Gabriel Jabbour, Mary Butler and Edward Callahan. Mayor Barbara Peterson was absent, the following -epresented the City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, City Attorney Kevin Staunton, City Engineer Glenn Cook, Assistant Chief of Police Gary Cheswlck, and City Recorder Teri Naab. Acting Mayor Goetten called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. (•1) CONSENT AGENDA Butler added Items #3, 4, 5 and 7 and removed items si3 and 14. Goetten removed Item #22. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to approve the Consent Agenda as amend#»d. Ayes 4, nays 0. Motions for all Items adopted by consent agenda will be included In the minutes in their respective numerical order. (*•2) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to approve the minutes of the regu I ar Counc i I meet i ngs held on July 1 3, 1992. Ayes 4, nays 0. LMCO - JOELLEN HURR REPRESENTATIVE Hurr a. %ed If any of the Counc i I Members planned to attend the Public Officials’ Boat Tour on Saturday. Hurr asked that a copy of the cou- t settlement regarding North Shore Drive Marina bo submitted to the LMCO. She stated she has a copy of the styrofoam orn nance. She noted that the LMCO is concerned with more than ju»t styrofoam docks. Jabbour noted he is expecting more scientific data on tne subject and will pass it along to the LMCO. Hurr noted that the Environment Conwnittea was extension to respond on tn« K^iqnway 12 issue, been adopted by the LMCO. granted a one ThIs response day has fei;< if' 4 I©>. > it-' '■ -Hf' iliil ”V' tet; '': F^vt'5- t .'4^; I 4 •« <C‘ I:: ■■ »l^’ ',v.;..'v ■; ■• •■ m..Ml'#,# W: ^. mcr.^fc,r,: ., ■«...' MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD JULY 27. 1992 . ,>v'^ LMCD REPRESENTAiIVE’S COMMENTS - CONT. Jftbbojr askad that thosa comments be sent to tntj watershed District. Hurr statsd that the LMCD has approved the Big Islanc Inc. 1992 dock license. Qsffron said that Big Island Inc. has applied for its 1992 license, wh 1 ch the Courci l will review at the August l01h meeting for either adoption or referral to the Lake Use Committae. H'jirr noted that Lakeside Marina has been given 10 days to provide an ss'^built survey. She added that there has been discussion at the LMCD regarding conflict of interest with regards to sailors and yacht clubs. Qoe'iten lnqulr«d about the ash project committee. Hurr reported there has been an Initial meeting, with a tour of the burn facility scheduled for next Wednesday. (at3) SI 752 QEORQE W. KALWEIT. 4205 FOREST LAKE DRIVE * AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3142 It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Resolution •3142 for AppMcatlon #1 752 for George W. Kalwelt, 4265 Forest Lake Orive, approving an after-the-fact variance to allow major structural Improvements of an existing deck located within the 75’ setback area. Ayes 4, nays 0. («#4) 01754 E. LEO BULLOCK, 2940 CASCO ^ .INT ROAD - AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3143 It was moved by Sutler, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Resolution •3143 for Application #1754 for E. Leo Bullock of 2940 Casco Point Road, approving after-the-fact variances to permit structural repairs to an existing deck. Ayes 4, nays 0. (••5) 91756 ROBERT E. WILSON. 4106 HIQHWOOO ROAD - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION 93144 It was movad by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Resolution •3144 for Application fl756 for Robert £. Wt'son of 4156 Hignwood Road, approving variances to permit the r«construet•cn of a tnree season screened porch. Ayes 4. nays 0. i i BWfcd0\' HINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORCNO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 (♦6) PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE - BAN ON STYROFOAM DOCK FLOTATION ORDINANCE #104, SECOND SERIES w Qaffron explained that the ordinance is the result of work by the Lake Use Committee. The Planning Commission has held a public hearing on the proposed ordinance, at whicn time they suggested changes. He noted two draft ordinances have been submitted for review and noted the differences. Butler stated she was willing to adopt whatever is reasonable, but did not wish to drag out the process longer than necessary. She requested that styrofoam buoys also be banned and requested it be added to the language of the ordinance. Callahan submitted a revised draft ordinance which includes a preamble, provides fc.' the ordinance to be included under the public nuIsance section of the code, and defines non-encasad Styrofoam In a similar way. He noted his ordinance requires all non-conforming structures to be removed by December 31, 1994. He added that most marinas using these structures have been doing so for some time, and he felt five years was too long to allow this practice to continue. 8^I,-:#."'" ./A- Jabbour noted that this is the third season of use for al i the marinas using styrofoam structures. Hurr stated that the Li'CD approved float'ng docks, but not a Specific type. She noted that l. e LMCD is anticipating adoption of an ordinance banning the use of styrofoam. She suggested that the ordinance be rowordeJ, changing 'City waters’ to "City limits . Jabbour asked how the proposed ordinance addresses replacement of existing docks. Callahan suggected ad-.ng, "this exception does not Include the right to repair or replace . 3 fc. r#' ^ ^m^,.te it :.A:Sfi ii:’wmrf; IS M i !&.W:. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CRONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 ORDINANCE #104, SECOND SERIES - CONT. Jftbbour r6ported that at the pub!ic hearing. Mr. Dunn stated he ftit th# City had not researched the * ssue enough and provided fi#m#S of contacts. Jabbour said he ta' ced to a Fred Hunt, Consulting Engineer and expert on floating oocks, who reported that ths styrofoam is the worst possible way of doing anything. Hunt said there are issues that no one has thought about Including the danger of using styrofoam around gas and oi I , and ultra-violet rays breaking up the foam faster, jabbour stated that United Design A^HQ^Intion reported that if the styrofoam is to be e'icased, it should be done with a metal and plastic layer. Nell Ross, President of International Marine Institute, stated that styrofoam Is a nation-wide problem. Jabbour said that everyone he talked to was willing to back the City’s position. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to adopt Ordinance #104, Second Series, witli the following corrections: First page, subdivision l - "Docks, platforms, byPYAx and other floating structures. . Change "City waters" to "City limits'. Subdivision 1 - "Gasoline, fumes, fumes. delete the word Subdivision 3, Page 2 - include buoys. Subdivision 3, Paragraph B - "This exception does not include repairing or replacing the existing styrofoam. Ayes 3, nays 0. Ooetten abstained. Qoetten felt that they did not have enough time to proposed ordinance. review the Gaffron asked that the Sub-sect already been used. on be changed as that number has Callahan felt It best fit at the end of the chapter. He added that the marina owners were given an opportunity to discuss the issue at the Lake Use Committee meetings, and they have been advised throughout the entire process. Qoetten asked to review the amended ordinance at the ne«t meeting. t >’i «•> ■ -> ■ ®fe;' . mV* •' m W- ^ EISfe v.P- .‘‘i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT A) Butler requested CourcM be provided with a list of solicitors In the future. She said she was unaware that even Issued the licenses. approved the City Jabbour stated the license should also list the standaras for eoprovaI. Moorse said he would review those standards. B) Jabbour reported that the LMCD’s Task Force has hired a mediator to form a consensus from the meetings. He thankea the City of MInnetrlsta and Scott Carlson for their support and thanked Dick Cherba tor the use of the plane. He explained that the summary included In the report is based on old criteria, but the Task Force has requested the summary be changed to be based on new criteria. Jabbour explained that the DNR has counted 217 car/trailer parking spaces• but based uoon the DNR's old criteria there are actually 046 parking spaces available. He said the DNR has agreed to allow 10* credit for parking of vehicles with canoes, jet skis and other recreational vehicles. He has suggested to the DNR to reduce the number of parking spaces by 145 to get to the 700 parking spaces mentioned before. He added the Fisherman’s Lobuy has supported Orono’s position. He said he has been told by the DNR that this Is the last study they are doing on Lake Minnetonka, and feels Orono IS trying to stall the DNR. ENGINEER’S REPORT (••7) PAY REQUEST §5 HIGHWAY 12 FRONTAGE ROAD “ SEWER, WATER 0 STREET IMPROVEMENT It was moved by Butler, seconded by Cal lahan, request for payment to B a D underground, Inc. $15,520.21 for trunk Highway 12 frontage road. Street Improvements. Ayes 4. nays 0. to authorize the for an amount of sewer,water and CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT ($6) FUEL STORAGE BIO AWARD Moorse reviewed a memo on insurance and a memo from the Buiiding Official regarding above versus beicw ground tanks. He stated *'hat underground tanks are less expensive initiaMy. there does appear to be a great difference in future insurance underground tanks, but that i fficult to determine. cos t s nut for V (V- k-W,fpit ■ Pi® " )y A'^- W' j il<; k;«m^ i’JT -•j-i- m- rf'teft ! ••■, v'^J' •••-V'v" '■|i mm K'|ii|-i' ^■„.k ; 5; A ‘ ?i^ •■ ' .'/: PP;i- :> ‘r';;* ka ■P ■.fW'--vrJt?. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 FUEL STORAGE BID AWARD - CONT. Q#rhardson Introduced Mike Keeie. representative from Pump and Mater. Keel# stated the underground system his company bid is a double tank system, electronically monitored, and anchored into the ground. He noted that the governmental agencies are in the process of revamping the regulations governing above-ground tanks. Jabbour asked if Keeie would recommend fiberglass versus steel. Keete said he would. Jabbour a'.ked about eco ogical effects. l.wttie explained that the tanks underground are no longer a single tank. Qoetten explained they are very concerned with the environmentaI issues, and have actually required others to remove underground tanks. Keeie indicated the risk factor >s the same for botn types of tanks. Jabbour noted that they were told that fiberglass tanks would be approximately double the price. Keeie felt that estimate to be Incorrect, and noted that both fiberglass and steel would be approximately the same price. Keel explained that the tanks now have a 1/2'* thick protective coating end there has been so much new technology in this field to perfect the t^nks. Callahan asked about potential for problems it there is a leak m- ground. He gathered that there ii a move to more above-ground tanks and that Is why the new regulations are being drafted. Keeie noted above-ground tanks are just an option which needs to be eddreesed. He stated that al l the probes on the underground tanks arc accessible through manholes, and guaranteed that they would never have to dig up the tarKs. to repair or replace monitoring equipment. . .. L.. . . R'7:i-'v' J-'>*■■:-i. ■ i-i.:m.. mil-m: '■■#:■ sKf •'• ■■..)■>I- * rl- r-= ' • ills' 7 ' mr' 'S. lute,:w^; MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 FUEL STORAGE BID AWARD - CONT. Jabbour said he feels strongly against underground tanks. He noted that everything that could haopen to the tanks, actually has happened. Kaale Indicated that most leaks are caused tanks. by overfilling the Jabbour understood ♦hat between 1993 and 1995 the EPA may change laws governing super funds, and may require tank owners to pay a larger portion for any c'eanup costs. Frank St. Lawrence, 253 Cygnet Place, stated he has a friend who la a former employee of the PCA who told horror stories about the Old tanks and wonderful stories about the new underground tanks. He said as a citizen he would rather not have to look at above ground tanks. Jabbour reminded them that they can use the existing tanks until they come to a decision or get more information on future changes. He stated that underground tanks would require the City to carry spec laity Insurance. Qerhardson stated he has talked to Pat Kennedy who pointed out that the City has Insurance through the League of Minnesota Cities, which Is much cheaper than from the private sector. Butler expressed her concer^ with the high water table on the site. Kaala said the tanks would be anchored to concrete, filled with product and would be capped. Callahan noted he is not satisfied with what he is hearing. Goetten said she would be more comfortable approving abo/e-ground tanks. Jabbour asked If Ecovault meets current standards. KeeIe agreed that they do, but reminded them that those standards may change. It was meved by Callahan, seconded by Butler the fuel storage bid awaru. Ayes 4, nays 0. to table approval of i '.A*"37T=V-T'N;^Viylfir': lif'-v' -r' ^ rv. A?- ■v; .^■f^;r \ I"" f»:' if ’i m r ■ % y3s ,:jp: ■m ■ # MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 (#9) CITY CLEAN UP A YARD WASTE COSTS Moortw wxplalned the clean up program provides for a fall clean up. He referred to costs of the clean up. He noted that because of the 9reet volume collected during Doth the spring clean up and the yard waste program, the cost was over budget for the amount designated for both clean ups and the recycling program. He stated a large portion of the spring clean up amount was construction debris. Ooetten felt they must make changes now to be able to continue the program. She said that people pay to have appiiances removed from their homes, and felt they should pay the nominal fee for bringing appliances to the clean up. Jabbour asked If the additional construction debris is because of the inability to burn. Qerhardson agreed that may be adding to the volume. Jabbour suggested that the City not accept any construction material. He said he Is against raising the annual recycling fee. Callahan asked staff to suggest fees for all types of materials being brought to dispose of for Council to review at the<r next meeting. Mr. Furchner said that Wayzata charges $.50 per bag of yard waste. (910) FIRE SERVICE ALTERNATIVES Moorse suggested reviewing the alternatives during a work session. Butler 4Sked the boundaries of peripheral cities. Moorse stated they include Mound Maple Plain and wayzata and several ccenarlos include expanding the peripheral cities’ boundaries to cover the entire City. Ooetten asked l f Moorse will suppiy the Councit with response tirae« arJ costs at the work session. Moorse asked if the Council wished response times for ail six ecenarios. Butler thought on•y Alternatives *3 anc 6 were necessary. 8 { >< vs ) ■V ,.,r-?'pyv .1, - :* ^- ' ^'Is ‘li' BS; . 4-- .-i ■ P ',y ‘ .; •... ;r,V r---\. ,v;v, '• •. ■'■ iip'' i y; ,':• f i''- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 FIRE SERVICE ALTERNATIVES - CONT. Jabbour suggested dK-ussIng the alternatives with the Long Lake Fire Chief. He added that the Long Lake Firemen are great and added that probably about two-thirds are residents of Orono. Butch Loomis, Assistant Fire Chief of Long Lake, was present Qoetten told him that the Council has the greatest respect for the firemen on the Department. Butler explained that Orono’s concern about the fire department is that Orono funds 80X of the administrative costs of the Long Lake FI re Department and has OX authority with regards to admi nistrative decisions. Jabbour asked Loomis if the department was in need of anything. Loomis noted they need to replace one truck, but felt they had adequate equipment to cover the Orono area. Qoetten stated she took great offense to Dan Reed’s comments at the Highway 12 meeting. Callahan said there have been comments about the firemen being in danger having to cross Highway 12. Loosils felt that those men cross the highway during their normal live* and felt there should be no difference when on the way to a fIn He added that the men are taught that they must obey alI traffi regulations and never put themselves in danger when traveling to the fire. He asked if Orono has tried to work with the City of ^ong Lake regarding the administrative concerns. Jabbour noted that the Council has tried very hard to work with the City of Long Lake, but has not gotten satisfactory results. He felt that Orono should be allowed to take over the administration of the fire department. Qoetten asked that Loomis forward information on the number of homes In Orono that Long Lake Fire Department services. A work session was scheduled for Thursday, July 30. 1992 at p.m. in the Council Chambers. The Council requested that Cheswick attend m the PoMce Chief's absence 3:30 Gary . kwiiUi I ^vr#. te'V^ ma ■</‘\ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 (*t11) AMENDING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE STUBBS BAY SEWER PHOJECT - RESOLUTION #3145 . . « , *It mov«d by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Resolution #3145 adopting Stubbs bay sanitary sewer assessment roll. Ayes 4, nay# 0. -0 OF(a#12) ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO ALLOW AN EXTENDED TIME PE» HOOKUP TO THE NEW STUBBS BAY SEWER SY* TEM - ORDINANCE #105, SECOND SERIESIt waa moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to remove this item from the consent agenda. Ayes 4. nays 0. Callahan thought that Council had decided that if a connection to the aewer was deemed necessary under the standards of the City, a property would be made to do so. He noted the ordinance proposed allows five years to all properties. Qoetten thought It was decld ; that if a problem were found with the existing system, the property must be immediately connected to the sewer. Saffron explained that if each existing system were examined more Closely, the City would find up to 95% of the existing trench systems do not meet current standards for separation from mottiing, and therefore would be considered as non-conforming. He noted that requiring 10 month connection deadline* for 95% of tne Stubbs Bay properties was not his impression of Counci I’s intent at the pubi ic hearing. Butler said that If the system is failing to the point that a holding tank is necessary or effluent is discharging, the property mutt be cf mected ifwned i ate i y. Callahan felt that the situation m the Stubbs Bay area is a bad situation and the soli is being bothered by this c.ituaiion. He wants those residents to hook up as soon as possible. Jabbour notad that datarmination of the staff. at the last meeting, Council left the need to hook up to the sole discretion of Qaffron noted that w'th the new shoreiand regulations adopted, many more systems will oe found to be non-conf ormi ng. He said when a permit or variance is requested, staff looks at the system for conformance. Callanan thv jght the Septic Inspector house to Inspect existing system.. was nired to go house-to- ■%p. ., .■ y ■ •r-i: . - ■PVi.': - ''"rV pi?v ii k;>Ife r’. ^ ■ te' ‘ i'. ■-r I t j< * ■ A.?-S'- 'ill: IR' . - V^-- ’■fc pgi- . w W-'- :'3r^T. tT-- "I . m-\ .-?rt MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 ORDINANCE §105, Sf ONO SERIES - CONT. Qaffron noted the Inspector has no^ yet added soil borings to his normal maintenance procedure, although that wll lii^ely occur in the future due to the shoreland reauirements. Callahan added that the base areas of the project are m serious need of the eewer and should have to connect immediately. He felt that the deadline date was extended to allow those in other areas, such as Cygnet Place and Leaf Street with an acceptable system, additional time to connect. Qoetten agreed with Callahan. Shr thought the number of resioents allowed the full five year time period would be very small. Jabbour stated he felt that those with a working system, should be allowed the additional time. He said with the restrictions so savare now, almost all systems would be found non-conforming. Moorse remembered a number of residents at the pubiic hear'ng concerned about the criteria used by staff ^or conformance. Jabbour felt that part of the negot.ation with the resident' as a compromise on the connect ion deadline date. He felt the Council should adhere to their original decision. Butler thought the intent was to change the current ordinance to allow bC months for connection instead of the current 16 months. She said she did not envision a whole new set of regulations. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by But er, to adopt Ordinance #105, Second Series, extending the time period for hook-up to the new Stubbs Bay sewer system. Ayes 3, nays 0. Callahan abstained. (#13) AMENDMENT TO THE CITY’S FEE SCHEDULE CONCERNING ’^HE SEWER SERVICE CHARGE FOR UN-CONNECTED PROPERTIES - ORDINANCE #106, SECOND SERIES Moorse explained this is a change in oolicy allowing the Stubbs Bay area residents up to five years to connect to the srwer if their current eeotic evstem is not failing, and waiving »he servicecurrent eeptic system is not failing, charge dur*ng that interim period. Goetten asked <f Orono is properties during that time bili«d from the M.W.C.C. for fnose Moors# stated that this is thv City’s liing for sewer and Orono wi : • not be billed by m.w.C.C. for the addit'o.'.Ai orooerties until they connect. 1 I •rv..,'4,it.. m mj» “fclff.-'. rrBjiL-'<‘.f» ‘ rVy.tei' ■' Jl ■ - 1 •:S M yi7 •j m’ •4i® m< ■ • .r : '?pf- . ' . V .Sfe--:^i| ‘iM'\ p#r ^i¥ m-.' fcr? < ;.’w ■■ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD JULY 27, 1992 OROINANCE §106. SECOND SERIES - CONT. iutl*r tugg«st«d that tha wording ba changad for tna paragraoh that •tarts out "Svubbs Bay Araa Projact. . . 'to All propartiaa will Day *Ha City .portion of quarterly pilling beginning with sarvica availability and billing will include the Metropolitan waste Control CoiiiBil •• I on charge upon connection to system . It was wovad by Jabbour, seconded by Goatten, to adopt Ordinance #10®. Second Sarlas, as amended. Ayes 4, nays 0. Casi4) OROINANCE AMENDMENT TO ALLOW PARTIAL AS8C80MENT6 - ORDINANCE #107, SECOND SERIES PRE-PAYMENT Of Sutlar aakad that the ord- lanca clarify whan the la to begin. interest accrued It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Ordinance •107. Second Series, permitting partial pre-payment of special aasaatfsent for Stubbs Bay sewer project #13937, as amended. Ayes 4, nays 0. CS1S) APPLICATION Of CERTIFICATE Of PAYMENT §5 II; naa moved by Butler, seconded by Jabbour, to approve City Hall and PubIIc Works BuiIdings Architact’s appi•cation and certificate for Payment a® as follows: Kraus-Anderson Construction Co. Steenburg-’Watrud Construction Co. SsDbart Electric rtoi In Concrete Oreaser Concrete/Masonry At I led Mechanical $21.853.18 27,000.00 22.311.00 6.331.00 29.609.10 12.347.00 Aye# 4, naya 0. Jabbour asked when they would be given Drojact. the final cost of the Mooraa said they have not been given this information to date as the General Contractor i# continually trying to find ways to reduce the amount. ■w 41 i i i If L.. ■“p■ r ^ - - H "‘ ■-I'f 'i- -1 ;;rS: V, 'V^ ■% ffiit iipBf?'. W-ny % • ,^v 1^' r:'■ ll« i-m: iuf •F # :M:^ y$if^|-?r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 21, 1992 (Ml6) SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMEN18 A RESOLUTION YEAR XVIII COMMUNITY DSVttOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM - RESOLUTION 93146 It was movad by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Resolution §3146 authorizing Mayor and City AdmInistrator to execute aubracipient agreement with Hennepin County for the Urban Hennepin Coynty Community Development Block Grant Program. Ayes 4, nays 0. (•17) FALL NEWS LETTER Quetten felt they should send out a newsletter, and suggested Including an update on Highway 12 and information on the styrofoatn ordinance. Butler felt that if the Cable Commission intends to include a neMSletter to be sent with the City’s newsletter, they should be mode to pay half of the cost. All Members agreed. !t was moved by Butler, secondeo by Callahan, to authorize serjing out a fall neweletter, and If the Cable Commission is to >- .lude a newsletter, they must pay half of the postage. Ayes 4, nj»ys 0. (Mli) ANENOINQ DESIGNATED SIGNATURES FOR POST DISBURSEMENT MONEY - RESOLUTION 93147 It wet movr< h* Butter, seconoed by Callahan, to adopt Resolution #3147, de^'grM Ing signatures for the Minnesota Board of Peace Officer St«.ncef la and Training Disbursement Money. Ayes 4, nays 0. STREET(•It) PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING CONCERNING LEAF REOOMSTRUCTION TO MSA STANDARDS Jabbour asked how long the City has before they must use the MSA funds for thin year. Cook indicated for this year, there is no deadline for the use of those funds, however. Council needs to make a decision at the next Council meeting In order to allow time to draft the plans for the project and get authorization to use the MSA funds. iutlar asked to review the analysis before the tnformational Meeting. Moors# noted he will send out that information and Council may discuss the issue prior to the informational meeting. A public informalIonal meeting regarding Leaf Street reconstruction to MSA standards has been scheduled on August 10, 1992, during the regular Council meeting. ■ .'a' iM i \ J ♦r-'.' i-.-liilliipi1"^. SjS'-lkiW" .;■MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING MELD JULY 27, 1992 (#20) JOINT MEETING WITH PLANNING COMMISSION Moortt notwd this Is a Joint masting with the Planning Commission to discuss tha proposed Ice hockey arena. ft was agraad to have a joint meeting with the Planning Commission on August 17, 1992 after the scheduled Planning Commission meeting, at approximately 9:00 p.m. m JabPour aakad that It be announced at the beginning of the work •aaalon that this la not a public information meeting. (•21) COUNCIL PARTICIPATION IN CORN DAYS PARADE pmim ^ t*/ Goattan announced that the Mayor will be riding in her own car. All Mambars said they do not wish to participate In the parade. mM- -:i« -K (a#2IA) TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT ORONO GOLF COURSE p.. m It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to authorize hiring , Robert Drasaal, Jr. at the Golf Course at an hourly rate of $5.00 1% I affective July 29, 1992. Ayes 4, nays 0. h||*J,.ATT«INIV« WPOUT The Counc11 adjourned to Executive Session at 10:00 p.m. to discuss ^ ^ pendIng 1111 gation. (#22) LlCfNBiS Goattan noted she disagrees with the granting of the trapping IS permit for beavers. She noted the permit runs from June 9th to August 9th and allows for up to 20 beaver to be caught. She felt this la excessive. Moorsa explained that the conditions were extracted from the DNR permit, and noted that trapping has not begun on the property. felt they should look at other al ternat i ves. Ooetten said she appreciated the need to move the beavers on, but m It Mv,d by Oobtt.n, ttcond.d by Butlar, to d.ny th* Limit.d Ueghold Trap Permit for Richard Hassei. Ayes 2, lays 2. Jabbour and Callahan voted nay. Motion failed It was moved by Jaboour, seconded by Butler, to approve the Limited Leghold Trap Permit for Richard Massei. Ayes 2, nays 2. Caiiahan and ^tten voted nay. Notion faited 14 ■ i.rI ms ( •;, .-. 'sc^■- " ^='^- J-itlP> :: -MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 V..4-i;tCEN8E8 - CONT. »vm.::. W- It wat movad by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to table approval of tha Limitad Laghold Trap Permit for Richard Hassei. Ayes 4, nays 0. Notion carried. '•‘\i ,1 KH It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to approve the following licenses: ,kt;P(i ^ sV ■ .V . - Saptic System Installer License - Barfkecht Excavating f-SiWiwPSfeiv:: V . Annual Home Occupation License Renewal - Heliotrope Garden Oeelfln One Day Set*up Permit * Smith College Club Ayes 4, nays 0. (ea23) BILLS ismt- ■’ It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to approve payment #f the All Funds Account. Ayes 4, nays 0. MMmmmn It was sioved by Jabbour. seconded by Butler, to adjourn the regular OronoCity Council meeting at 10:00 p.m. to Executive Session. Ayes 4, nays 0. s m \/iji: ■# ■■ *■■'■■ M ATTEST: J. DIann Goetten, Acting Mayor • Vr lift mvrM:^h Dorothy M. Hat I in, City Clerk •?» i^p.: ■, .. . iiilliS;. ■M4- :iMa^ .' -•ft •ft n-’-' ,1 If A >A ■■.-■.■ m*§i■ 'VSmJ liiSi toiling Filo #1753 July 14, 19923l!a■ 'M M '■0 %m'SBM '■ J'3 mB| ii '-ivi ■:tjv :t; 'i- '^m 4s' 'I ii iate' «1S«| Ml m Tho pool basin in excess of 1,000 s.f. requires a 30’ side ••tback. There is adequate width for pool to meet the 30' side•ttbaok on each aide of lot.Staff has enclosed the cenditiTOffn~pgFi!il± ef> the MOWD^ landscape plan and plantings schedule for application #1704, applicant's original conditional use permit seeking to improve drainage ditch along shared lot line of property to immediate northwest. Members may reaesiber the replanting of trees within the 0-75’ setback area was addressed by the City Council and determined that trees need not be placed in exact location of original trees but may be located at OltneF'S option but must be placed within lakeshore protected area. Applicant's consultant is still working with the Minnehaha Creek llatersliod District to provide final pieces of information so that the drainage ditch improvements can be completed. At the time of the iktailiage ditch improvoients the landscaping as proposed in application 11704 will also be completed. Isrdshlp itatament Please review Exhibit A, applicant's addendum. TimmiB #■’1« Dardcover within the 250-500* setback area is at 42.9%. Total area between the 75*-500' setback area is 45,370 s.f. Total hardcover within the area is proposed at 11,495.5 s.f. or 25.3%.S’ ■$^s ■ . . ■ ■'V- - ^'v- 2flti»S s«f. or 10.7% of hardcover in the fora of landscape area underlain with plastic exists within the 250-SOO' setback area... §10 s»f. or 5.91% of hardcover in the form of landscape area UtMisrlain with plastic exists within the 0-75' setback area. 10 existing hardcover removals are to be considered as a cendition of approval, these removals should be cosg>leted prior to the feotiag/foundation inspection for the pool structure. You must alec condition approval on applicant obtaining penalty building permits for shed and piimp house. Applicant should also be placed on notice that all strutures to be located in lakeshore yard require variance approval Planning Coesiiasion consents regarding complaint letter. 1 1* I II*« ftl•!• •^^31 I* •IMnl* « > 4i • 1 « *9 « tl^i* > V 1#1» • »4i»«* • • i <P C«TTT^^b» •9V i»{ :• H •io ,:':g^w iS'Vifl =■'ps^owr OF ORONO - VARIAMCB APPLICATIONite m Zflltial Application Fee $17 5.00(150.00 per each additional variance) Reneeel Variance Fee $100.00(no ohanve from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-*the*Fact Fees (Double application fee) ♦gSBrfa,0^ \ tKMPBRTT INFORMATION ^ •ite Address ^7$ Froperty Xdentif • Number (P. i.D.) 0 l fil J5 ' /P^ co/j^ |S Attach legal dea-'ription to application if not ineloded on required survey, bate Property Acquired (month/year ) 1 (do)<2o own the a^acent parcels of land. Freaent use of property i t/residential ____other (specify) loaing Districti_____LA-iir___________ ;|| AffMCABT . %■ W Phone (work) rfcfJP Zip*jt Phone (home) ____________(if different than applicant) Name ____________________Phone (work) Addresst Cityj_ _ _ _ Zip I p: p”m HBfCKEFTlQII OF RMOORST Estimated Construction Cost $ . PeftjegfltfeOascriberuest in detail #4ir mmm g| VANXANCMI m iim ■S’-'W.- Lot Width Front Side Ha r deeper Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore w ;>|V, eatim •:: » .Other (specify) p/MmcMXwnm or tmoaoAL proprrtt conditions m--Oeacribe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property Mmmm ; >,»s iej-TT-r; w.'» fjrTarjrbso-'^isi^ K? L iSSSI I M irty ‘liP- I ifl 4 ?.i ' ' M,„V !M';» ■'^; i p^v-r .'^•i;nb 4 •*awf B 0'^ IliINNEHAHA lifATERSHED CREEK DISTRICT j M. tlil liT. Wtjmita. Minnesota 55391 |Mi#lMiii«M(4imH R. iftmutt • Mm E rhomu • ntomu W Lafi:iumy immt. i«M«C WMn»UM*Q«kOTUndlfy*rtamasM4pt« Jr tSff MMIltffOfUi June 24. 1992 :y.; ii ' Permit Application No. 92-110 Applicant: D. T. Madge 875 Forest Amis Lane Mound. MN 55364 Location: City of Orono, See. 7AB, Forc.si Lake. Lake Minnetonka Purpose: Alteration of the floodplain to modify an ensung dnunageway Dear Mr. Madge: At the regularly scheduled June 18, 1992 meeting of the Board of Managers, the subject permit appliettiem was reviewed. Action was taken allowing the Dririct staff to issue your permit only aner receipt and staff approval of the following: t. 2. rtevised site plan sp^ifying a minimum size of C.^ 3 rip rap for the approximately 160 lineal feet of drainage swale at a 5 percent slope. Revised site plan specifying length of rip rap. erosion control placed across the swake. m induding an erosion control inMallation detail and identifying all areas of fill and excavtuion below the projected 100>year frequency flood elevation of Lake Minnetonka of 921.5 3.I- 'I#' C:* . includ*ng existing and proposed Volume calculatKMis for all fill a no net 4’ • *.4 . ' ' . 'Xk :W*'- n decrease in flood stora^ capacity. Cross sections of thi existing channel including locations of proposed rip rap d^Remnsinatng that the project will not encroach on the navigational capacity of die chamL Wrinen permission from U«! applicant's c^ighbor for work to be performed off the applicanrs propeny. iliaie be advised that the project is not authorized until the above has been submitted to me and you haw heen mnif^ of permit issuance from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed DistricL All W' 3»' fiiNdieit mthiHls must be st^mitted on or before July 15. 1992. If these items are not receive bmi July leganifaig mis matter, please contact me at 473*4224 Ibei July 15* 1992 this permit application will be tabled. Should you have any questions Sincerely. lAMES M MONTOOMERY. COWSULTINO BNOINEERS. INC En^laeiii for die District w I’r- Rcmakl S. Quanbeck. P.E. bt r » Bo^ fik Citv of Ofwio * ‘.S >W . • -M- i h' * ''0 ^:% < Adjacent Property Owners* Acknowledgement Form /u ffl;* I ^ -a , -^v H "'■ I (we) 0. Ay ^ ^ [print name(s)J l^a'Z of 0^5 «^/'A [print address] ^l«e reviewed the plans for proposed improvement or proposed use of the Sl^.rty ' t 4v.v-.j^ also referred to as Land C.e t Application No. _ _ _• I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, T fe'?' l-«^\ not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the proper y(are) not asaec to aecx*t« - - - aware ofr ::;:i ““rnf ir;"fo; ;.v cit; counof i-t^t til* iaiprovaraent plan, and that the proposed neighbor s projeo. fe*|Uires Council approval. / - f s \ / ^ Pr^crty Date P^^irty Owner u l/ ) Date 1 (we) _a ‘',1 ^:, f fa k d (p •* i nt namel s) ] of 4 [print address] have reviewed the plana for tha proposed improve ,nt orJ «a. p ' a:,-, • * also referred to as Land Jseproperty located at _ _-J_ ^ - Application No I (w.) understand that in es.cuting this •"*"‘;„Vor’u« f s.«v*tf4 ro declare “approval or disapproval of the propertyUr*) not asked to d«iar*-*ppr Council that I (ve) am (are) awar* of tat MX*ly to confirB t-H n.iohbor’s oroleot or u.ohut Mrely to confirm ror x:.iw ------------ , nmiect or usethe ieprovement plans and that the proposed neighbor s projec. or ^ # A __ __ _ _ —^ A arequires Council approval. 1 y ' * #fop«rty 0*mmr Dmtm .*r^ r •.• * }- 2 i-: wm v': froperty Owner Date kt u you hav* any infor-ation that -y aaal.t the t thi- Land O.a AppUc.tion, please subait your coma.nt. to the Suliaing ‘‘ 5^^ St 1...' 10 day. prior to the sch«lul«l m-.ttn, date. 1 J j t/ * *n i ^4^O.ot>t -V A *^al^/Va>a. T” m<l f B 11 T;ii i^i. H ID C T)iiCk u 1 1 j/^ ■ tm •1/D MAit.££»J riaA‘w- 1 ir -e:__a<2\*:^ 1 •y Q 'ZfevZ.tA 1 n H -iiL-X T If ^ ----- ■ ■ '"1 -iL-. i.V,, . 1 ■] i| 19 aa 1^ iJ D A f / 1 #- 1 M .JiL.>—Q A^^vic- r^iWi^d j -is.V Vp^i4 fs/V Aliuto rr" Al: I n -ia.. -die .. 4c T C)i\T (r!3yA.. j _ 4 —ku ------^ViAl^W M-V-'U* i^uG 1 C sJ b 'iL -----®-----AutMUm \ j£l»PiI »;'r- vl . ..r- 1 1__>•M1— / Afsjr * r^Pr MA-rALi_rCi A 4. mm , ' i-. . '■ liSm."iw- I %- j? .%s •v>.,. lil li!% m “'•^. «i%,^ % ' .il^:. • i'%- ■■'..feV( - ■r.-t. jHiiJr. . = p«: lifi-'' HARDCOVER CALCULATIOSETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) Existing Hardcover in Zone A. House LENGTH I. Garage V. c. Driveway 0. Sidewalk E. Patio/ Deck »!* R.UNOSCAfE AREAS UNDERLAINlY _Li RUSTIC SHEETINO ^r‘ s. Otheii 75-250' 250-500' 500-10C0' WIDTH J S Total Hardcover in Zone idL S.F. S .F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. lu S.F. Total Prorerty Area in Zone 2A.£S.F.s [D_i«s Z-2,X 100 ^ 7 % ,.i,.------ vf;.'. * J- Os // Oc CO i '1 H i i-' IR HAfiOCOVE.1 OU.CULATION HURKSHEEI N ■fe*? SlTtACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75'( 75-250' 250-500 Existinq Hardcover in Zone C>f^OM(J| ^^fsJ500-1000' N^-' - * pte; - . m: J|ft>':#' llf« >Kf".fe« 5&V«S;3 |S • • LENGTH X . WIDTH m S.F. X .S.P. 0» ' X _ • S.F. - X _S.P. i?HRO B. ’ftORBr .//?_ X /i.- -2 3^S.F. Ve c. D riveway - X P • ^ S.F. - X S.F. 9 • 0. Sidewalk . X S9 S.F. . X S.F. - *1^35 S.F. e. Jatio / D eck X • .S.P. F. Lanoscafc « X m S.P. AREAS UNDERLAIN IV X S.F. FLASTIC SHifTINO X S.F. ftovi-pgrR S X AJ/___. /23 S.P. WWAU.% ^£5«.ir OfRAu<'/NE»• f S.P. § Total Kaaocovir in Zone s =tfc I 1l**Ai 0»K ^ Ui tp .F. [7] mmmmm I.F, [3 ^s^. Total Profcrty A rea in Zone f71 .t(T] 3 5,o:>S X 100 - /».6 3 % /A 'V' # «r • ^ 'F A:.i I ,W Jn'tr-^. ■■ •■r'■>■■.. ' V >■ ■ -’. j •;.» _.'=^- ifS-'f' ■ mMit''mr lk ‘i^. V-*’'k J^-Wr M i'l) -.'‘j^- HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250 Existing Hardcover in Zone A. House ^/y LENGTH ->t) «/ A c. Driveway Ur 0. Sidewalk E. Patio/ R.Landscape areas ^4 UNDERLAIN . BY ^ PLASTIC SWEETING 5? TSC n , 2: 6. Other Jit. O' ii WIDTH / Y /VA 1-i jaLC X __L X G^Tvir X X X i LI X X A xn X V ?_£ £ 5 X X i W X W A* Tota ? Hardcover in Zone Total Property A rea in Zone [B4^i iL :50-50^; 5CC-IQ00' • _ l ifl S.F. ' ^ C If S.F. ■ i-^y S.H . / . /'/A S.F. . S.F. ^•73^S.F. S.F. -ia. /X 7 0 S.F. _ir^S.F. V a )S.F. /rz^S.F. 3fo .. S.F. 4TO _S.F. i£l y _S.F. l*X W^- S.F. S.F.ami S.F. "11^ r^m T t S.F. ' S.F. - ^ 0 V 100 • ih « aj/__ •1 Vi*if a oyTo 1 '7? mmm>mw^^'~:,. 4 wWt p-^ Vfe''' 10'^^ m hm .,;^- ■f" fe: r 'V K'm* w f-v .i,rS‘;':. ■■•■■• . H M-i. tr*^ ftgrT W:sr I . ■•' ■■ .:l vVAT^P-^ ~ ben~tK • u.)( T?oo G T ?f\c^ C^A«f/v 6- A^pf/v : Q VJhtc S’^e^H B. e4.H : «r-re i> E^w'eit^ ^ ^ ^itSi^ OA^OFfti-r-ait/ :?t_A-»Nr ivvA^J AA < Av ~4 C T"*/S/ A ‘^Y L ^#^/10/1992WH,: ' TO: ORONQ PLANNING COMMISSION VK, ^,v UE ARE WRITING TO OPPOSE THE AVERAGE LA! ESHORE SETBACK VARIANCE H17<=■. ■? m ^ .iPFOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 075 FOREST ARMS LANE, REQUESTED BY SKIP li#.-/..-- MADQE • b:» SEVERAL ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGING ALTERATIONS HAVE ALREADY BEEN MADE HF at THIS PROPERTY? A) NEARLY ALL OF THE TREES BETWEEN THE HOUSE AND THE SHORE LINE HAVE BEEN CUT. THIS INCLUDES TREES THAT WERE WELL WITHIN THE 75^ SETBACK. THE SHORELINE HAS BEEN MODIFIED EXTENSIVELY WITH GRAVEL HARDCOVER AND RIP-RAP TO ACCOMMODATE A UNREASONABLE NUMBER OF WATERCRAFT. THE MAIN CHANNEL INTO THIS AREA HAS BEEN SIGNIFICANTLY WIDENED WITH A POWER DREDGER. POWER PLANT HAS BEEN INSTALLED TO PULL LAKE WATER FOR LAWN IRRIGATION. (PUMP HOUSE HAS BERN ADDED' C> D> ALL THE ABOVE HAS ALREADY BEEN DONE WITHIN THE PROTECTED “7*=* ft sJ LAKESHORE SETBACK 3> WHEN FOREST ARMS LANE WAS EXTENDED FROM THE AREA OF 915/920 FOREST LANE EAST, AND THE DIRT TRAIL WAS BLACKTOPPED. NATURAL DRAINAGE THE ROAD TO LAKE MINNETONKA WAS PROVIDED FOR. THIS NATURAL DRAI- 'HME WAS TO PROVIDE FILTRATION FOR RUNOFF GOING TO THE LAKE. THIS 5.4 natural WATER WAY ALLOWED FOR FILTRATION, AND REPLENISHMENT OF THE til SUBTERRANEAN AQUIFER, WHICH HAS NOW BEEN LINED WITH CEMENT CONVERTING i^pHE WATERWAY TO * MINI "LOS ANGELES RIVER". THIS UNNATURAL CEMENT WATERWAY WILL ACCELERATE THE WATER IT CARRIES, AND ADD TO THE RUNOFF SILTATION PROBLEM FOR LAKE MINNETONKA.. ALL THE NATURAL FILTRATION i'tHAS BEEN DONE AWAY WITH. . r/EXTENSIVE HARD COVER HAS ALREADY BEEN ADDED TO THE PROPERTY & QUESTION WITH THE ADDITION OF EXTRA CONCRETE PARKING SPACES. fe#AN0 PATIO ONLY ADDS FURTHER INJURY TO THE DAMAGE THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN THE HARD COVER INCREASE REQUESTED BY THE ADDITION OF A SWIMMING POOL ^^DONE TO THE SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENT OF THE AREA. PLEASE PROTECT THE 75' SETBACK AREA OF LAKE MINNETONKA. '-4* JbMiaa *** Ara» iiaoa U<mA, SB8«4 ■ .. _i L- Sb'i^y JUL 1 4 1992 .1 1 rV- ' •i:-^ ^ *•-»»■.V;', -. is&C’ i,- V 1: hw- ^:'-'.-:-/,r’^ rViw'irV V '.' .' M ^ m t.'f.''-.‘^,;jr; • ■ Kfe' !.^r. i& ii-m iiR Fp&:^ lit.. . g.Ptfe»;'v: mm- ii-' fiw:#*'^‘ c-?>» lilw...;•?*. !v -j--. ._.•; ■ -f’rt V;K%r. 'I, 7 Tot Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator nroas r «X Zoning Admin^^r£W^^ Dates Michael P. Gaffton, Asst Planning August 3, 19S2 Subjects 1991-1992 Joint Use Dock License, Big Island, Inc': List of Bsd&lbits Pa % % Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Proposed Resolution 1992 Application 1991 Application Letter of 2/10/92 Resolution No. 3006 Notice of Council Action 8/28/91 This is the application for Joint Use Dock License by Big Islandr Inc., pursuant to their 1991 conditional use permit approval. The 1991 application is considered the initial application, with that for 1992 being a renewal. Staff has drafted the license resolution to be retroactive to the August 26, 1991 date of conditional use permit approval. Dlscttssioin The use of Big Island, Inc.'s property for a day use recreation area with occasional overnight camping was the subject of an extensive review in 1991. Resolution No. 3006 was adopted August 26, 1991, granting a conditional use permit for that use. Big Island, Inc. was limited to 15 slips at the shared joint use dock, which requires this Joint Use Dock License. Big Island, Inc. has been granted an LMCD multiple dock license for 14 slips. The application for Orono*s Joint Use Dock License is identical, requesting for this season only 14 of the 15 allowed slips. 12 of the 14 slips are located on a three fingered dock extending 100* from the shoreline southeast of the existing building. The remaining 2 slips are near the swimming dock area. Orono considers all 14 slips as transient rather than permanent. LMCD is licensing 10 slips as transient and 4 as overnight storage spaces for use by campers. Orono's code does not get into the layout of the docks. LMCD has approved the configuration as proposed. The delay in bringing the application to the Council was related to a confusion in the feeu, which has now been cleared up. • '-HviJS® ■ ■, mm: j- 0% V RBSOLOTIOR DIRBCTI1I6 STAFF TO ISSUE A JOIST USB DOCK LICENSE TO BIG ISLAND, INC. SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOTED HEREIN FOR THE PERIOD OF AUGUST 26, 1991 TO DECEMBER 31, 1992 WBEREAS, the City of Orono, hereinafter "City" is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota and has the authority and responsibility under Minnesota Statutes, State Statute 412, et. seq. and State Statute 462, et. seq., to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the City and other members of the public within the City; and W-‘ impi’' m- mIt/- ftrp A' the City shares concurrent jurisdiction over the primary harbor limit of the City of Orono with the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and the Department of Natural Resources of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the regulation of the navigable waters Involves an •SMrcise of police power of the State, LMCD, and the City of Orono, all of which have adopted rules to ensure to all equal enjoyment of the public rights and equal protection from activity on or near the public waters and on the land within the City which, if unregulated, may be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare; and WHEREAS, the regulations of the DNR, LMCD, and the City of Orono regulate the property rights of the riparian owners both as to residential owners and the commercial marina owners to the extent prohibiting ary interference with the public waters adjoining their property. The LMCD, OMR and City of Orono must fulfill their trusteeship over the public waters by protecting against interference by anyone, including those who assert the comnonlaw rights of riparian owners, whether or not they be commercial marinas or residential owners; r‘.i WHEREAS, as to Lake Minnetonka, a mutual right of enjoyment exists between and is shared by riparian o«mers and the public generally, no one riparian otmer has exclusive privileges over Lake Minnetonka. The only additional private right that any riparian owner may have over the public generally is to construct one dock to the navigable depth of the public waters. There can be no dispute but that the public generally and each riparian owner to Lake Minnetonka has the right to use the entire surface area of Lake Minnetonka for all suitable purposes in common with all other riparian owners. This right is a right not only to members of the public but the right to each riparian owner. i&K-■ Page 1 of 2 i. '" ■ -'•T r -i-yjirr>^'» ■ '■ ■'•'S*"' -.%ims-b »-4v'^ ' *•••■< 1991-1992 Joint Use Dock License, Big Island, Inc.August 3, 1992 Page 2 :V.-> !-*" tm.--' fc^v w'* ■ The applicant has been advised to provide an updated Certificate of Insurance which likely will be submitted prior to the August 10 meeting. The application appears to meet all requirements for Joint Use Dock License approval. ’ ‘i.’ *c' . "* •■- Options for Action 1. Approval per attached resolution. 2.Referral to Lake Use Committee, 8/12/92 (only if Council feels additional review is needed). 3. Other • Staff ReooaMndati tMk. .JV:' fr': Staff recommends approval of a 1992 Joint Use Dock License, retroactive to August 26, 1991, for Big Island, Inc., 520/530 Big Island, per the attached resolution which references conditional use permit approval Resolution No. 3006. Moved by , seconded by to approve issuance of a 1992 Joint Use Dock License retroactive to August 26, 1991 for ipp Big Island, Inc., 520/530 Big Island.Ayes Nays. 5' .:' Su- m 'ri- ?= :■ W Ijj Sy;- ‘n v"! ■ : j: p' ‘%w- r-- ; Hi1 1 1i ■ i‘. ■ »•.■■'^y■■}MBm-CITY OF OROHO:^f ■■■ PC0r:, )t '■mMmii- EXHIBIT A RBSOLDTION NO. CONDITIONS OF ISSUANCE FOR ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE LICENSEE• IsXsncIf Inc* Dock Address: Big Island, Record Lots #12 and ' ter, .■mt .. m. ■ (520/530 Big Island) Agent: Thomas A. Judd Address : 1000 Superior Blvd., Hayzata, MN 55391 Licensee is: 1 XX iaiff unincorporated homeowner * s group incorporated homeowner's association unincorporated club or recreation group incorporated club or recreation group other Mmt. n-^ .‘ ' - License Period - August 26, 1991 to D cember 31, 1992 BOAT DENSITY w The number of in-place boat slips, lifts and buoys shall not exceed the number shoim on the attached plan. Exhibits B and C, and in accordance with ^pitesolution 938, in no case shall the number of authorized boat slips, B^ZiftSf or buoys exceed the number permitted in the prior year's license. Authorised Boat Density per attached plan: Bay Lower Lake W^m: mm- m:?- im" teM -i:' Transient (Day use only*) Slips Permanent Moorage Slips Boat Lifts Sub-Total: Slips at Dock Offshore Buoys Maximum Boats in Water A i m0Mm fe-" ’ ■A.'--, Maximum Boats per prior license MAXIMUM BOAT DENSITY N/A mm-*- x'j ":'fsS'K *Ber Resolution No. 3006, occasional overnight camping allowed. pmMC ' 1^. •.'?^ • •I ^ iiy'? Vv '■, I'V'V ' f 'i . v.V ►*, ; V-v < 'N «ir BIG ISLAND, INC. Mahplyata Island Lower Lake South City of Orono fe- •> ' h '■ ^,- iff'. V C-: ■ / CITY OF ORONO P.O. BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY/ MN 55323 473.-7357 lice:jse year 19 9Z /v-v<%Hvvrfe'" (association) ANNUAL -TnTTJT USE DOCK LICFNSE APPLICATION P^s^nt t° orono Municxpal Code Sectx^TTs ■ 42 ■} ‘ ’C Date Form Sent by City Staff Date Application Returned to City- -- - - - - - - - - - - . By Employee ^Fee Recxvea ? _ _ _ _ _ _—- - - TT/'tTMCP ppnrTTRED - It is unlawful for any section 5.42 Subdivision 2. „ore than two in number (Srroup or association P®“°"%°^Jror olAicipate in...joint use TSfany Sorr;ropL2?r’withou? first having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE A^LIC mS FE^TO THrCIT^CLER^'^BY'''^'’ Cl ff OF association information L ' i'*Ct *»tn#tuu I-*# 1 7’ • * r-f •»*'*»I X »‘X X w >. w\/v* r<im TICE 1. Association title or name (if a.ny) Big island, inc. 2 . T.ake Minnetonka rLcr^ ii v.*£)V A/ ai. V • W 71Li tuLf\ ____I u IT RO! 710:Eay Southeast tip ot nanp y --------“'0i>724y 3. Person responsible for this application: 475-3435 NflTw^ Thomas A. Judd ^ Mailing Address,J02£,Superior eouleva^d^^ Relationship to association__- --- - Page 1 of 5 k fK':, vnv Association is (check applicable itecs); unincorporated horaeovner's group, incorporated Homeovner*s Associatioa. unincorporated club or recreation group incorporated club or recreation group. m.7. Principal purpose of Joint use dock is (check applicable items): provide boat scoring and lake access for residential property, provide svimming access, beach, or offshore dock. _x_ provide a club or associatioa gathering place for activities. Dock is located on (check applicable item); one member's private property. eu-.iineat or outlet ovned in common, property leased by the group/as societion. X property ovned by the group/association. List Dock location and ownership infometion: street eddress RL 19, RL 12 r *r ^ ^ V' 'legal property description PID # 22-117-23-42-0019 22-117-23 -42-0020 -listed property ovner(s) _ Bi^ island, in £^ i..: :©'8 •Names of abutting lakeshore property owners: see Attached Exhibits a s b (North/We St)______________ (South/East) > V riff" -■ •V?;- :.r( i i - "P-:V (Name + Address) Neunes of ocher affected property owners : .■ liP$. .Page 2 of 5 ??> ■ ■ ■'mw p+^''. ‘ ^^ ^ ,T« The lointly used dock is Insured by one of the follovlng:Instirance Coverage - The joinwiy uscu. property ovner's homeovner's policy. ».,.v is::* IS--.. f- certificate of inecrance^to^docX at list the follovlng Infonnation: » wm- k:?‘ ■H "V name of Insured Big me Sit nans of Insurance carrier western world Insurance ^mnmk ©f InsuTance agency Tnguranrp rnnsnlt-ing Seruirca. effective dete of coverage6/29/91 II ;^r. coverag. policy DO* GLA 31447 5 . ,»«Bt of coverage; Public llablUty, per person, per occurence S 500,OOq^ 10 l£ i • ' Public HebUity, per occurence ♦----50(1 ,000 .01 1 Security enl policing of the Jointly 'ised dock and property Is provided by (check eppUcable Items): fencing. ^ security lighting. ^ property owner’s presence, contract security service, other (specify)- --- - - - - - - - -- mmM: ■ ■ ■•'s VSOCK inoH P-. 3v,- ■ ' % p 0:^- - '-K .-• ' ISP: . 11. List Dock Use Area Specifications: Width Of shoreline; 1.500^ ft. length of main dock from shore; Dock setbacks from side property lines at shore; -----500+----- ft. and _ 500+ Dock Construction (check applicable items): ft. ft. ms--' y seasonal dock (zelo'-Tted or replaced each year). _ pannsnant piling vltu seasonal deck. _ _paraanant piling and decking. wooden decking. ____ metal decking. 1^; - fPms ■■ 13. List Dock Accessories: of fire extinguishers avallsbla st the dock Boats required tg havt— of life preservers avallsble at the dock ------Boats required to have . I'd List number of slips In each category ("slips” includes boat lifts): ’ Transient (day use only) .Hp» X* Translent (day use) off-.hore buoys ^ Feznanent moorage alipa permanent moorage off-shore buoys Dry storage (reck) alipa Maximum number of boats at the JBkflftk dock i ”■ a.-ssi'S'sans'jrrrss’* sn.;: rrws road. 0 spaces. pp, ■ p:-Page 3 of 5 i: *. % •h "A i 5 ■j a ! /l ”» ■ ■ ^-.i«810B SEDIMSWTATION CONTROL16. Shoreune is protected ty (check applicaole lte=a): X stone rip rap. __ «od seavall. _ netel seavall. concrete seavall* gr^n and vegetation only, other (specify) 14 at 50 ft. out is approj. 10' Depth of vater at shore3Jjae is —1 — » at 100 ft. out is IliilEQOIBED KT. ars The following must accompany this application: dock plan - ALL APPLICATigt^ showing the shoreline width of this property, the A dock pl«., ->*»«> and dimensions of all docks, slipA dock plan, drawn to scale, sno^ng of all docks, slips f'V i-. • is*/ OlimCORPOakTED GROUPS OR ASS0C1AT _^— use-s --------- J addresses of all members and/cr slip use.s.1. A Ust of the names and mailing addresses o.. 2.A certified copy of the “ ®’'°“!?3i3°^a°«rtifies the following copy ia 22S. i^li„aon'\nd our joint use dock is to be »d.f J^e sa^e^^nis*^ agreement originuily cade in---------------- (State year) and on file with the City. S'-;Applicant's initials C.TMmaPoaAIEP GLOBS OR ASSOCIATIONS office'sr^^rair-r::2. A atateiaent as to the total nuinber of aeiiibers m tne c ratified copy of the articles o^i^o-ora^on^and ®J^fies is to be operated under the same arti (gta^ year) and on file with the originally made or last amended in ------- City. 3. Applicant's initials President ~Mark Scholle 8742 Leeward Circle Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Treasurer -Ralph Hatch 3955 Walden Road Deephaven, MN 55391 Vice President Secretary - Don Puzak 23830 Smithtown Road Excelsior, MN Brian Tichy 1471 Lake Lucy Road Excelsior, MN 55331 age 4 of 5 ^ -■‘^'L.- '^’ '. "^ . ur»-/.'C- Wp* r*. ' 1*4 ANNUAL LICEHSE FEE - ALL APPLICATION Joint Ose Dock License application fee according to the currexi't City Fee Schedule I4v*vr.-V. INITIAL APPLICATION FEE renewal joint use fee, per year PLUS SLIP FEE for each permanent moorage slip, lift, dry stack, or buoy slips 0 $2.00 each $ $^2.0 ■ O O TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION $ ZO, OC‘ A- . fe|ATE FEE - Renewals for renewal of licenses shall be m^e no later ^an Jimasry 31 of The Ci^ shalj^ not a£C|^ m AteSSel^lt^tions m'rr. Slip'i f^Stlon is accCTpanied by a late f^ of $25.00^ ■i-mmiEn PROCEDURE ■ a complete application is rereived, the application will be Council an., in the case of new or unusual ^ipplicaitcms, also by the Planning Commission and Marina i Connittee. The Council will pass upon the application after tbiqpletci review. THB SUBJECT DOCK MAY BE INSTALLED AND/OR OPENED FOR DSE ONLY UPON pyJkBPKOVAL OP THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Wsuant to section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, the **• _. ___ _________ - rnuncil to review this•relict hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this ooBpliance inspections . signed Date *v- • i'*’ V liiKv ■>vv Page 5 of 5 ; T- li!/. * •i! 'f H i m.mm-jmm '■ ■ .ri', •*■ ■ ^ A'wy^" J" • . Siip-^^-.’ 'p&"'^ .m lit^^ ^^r--%r.. ir,- fe?r^^v: te'T i't;‘■■ .m•3«"i >• v’.^* ; r?i’•■■'• is?*fete'/' - /%:4' ftt', 1v ^ jlt-r S' •'■pfei ; Wm%.. i?is iSte'-M 7 %r-V' te:te- ■ " : . '*. te ' *ptess.* / o r% -n t- ^ . ^ N A C 0 Uj t 4 “3 V.U| 7 <r ^ O'X ON J i <" 6-® y\ . t- ‘p ,■: .- - wI V • > X v\ ,O ■■iS BIG ISLAND, INC. Mahpiyata Island Lower Lake Souch City of Orono »2Srtiap5 “ x-s OMJjSl yi '<j- \r’•/ • > 'A<i? U V i VI > A • ». r i V U' / • 4 r /V ©.. n a V 1 1 o vA iT» VO. » O >A N rrv ^ « D U > 2o ui IT CM<T>cn «Ou 5 J OJeo CQ 1^o 4J 0) AJ X 00 t4c IM 0) >o uo IM 01 M Id sO A Am ] '51 3 ■I* ->. ...'^^ I.,L.^:A.. .VVT;wV.'2^ .;(/• « • ^7‘ '- .' iW : ' :hf :(^i ^7*’^ rj.«; T^r. ?.vr- M ■1^- i •♦^Cv.V- . • - *-■' • r & W- %I" ^'a:- ’. V. - •?.-• :. '•• i.? S-i- -17 I: uS-.-.* T /H.CITY OF ORONO LICENSE P.O. BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 473-7357 ? L -7^ (association)_tr i-■i Q V ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE ArP7.ICATIQN Pursuant to Orono Municipal Crde Section 5.42 Date Form Sent by City Staff Date Application Returned to City Fee Recived $_5^By ■ loyee Section 5.42 Subdivision 2. LICENSE REQUIRED - It is unlawful for any (group or association of persons or lami-ieS/ more than two in number, whether incorporated or not' to engace or participate in...joint use (of any lakeshore property) without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED ATTACWIENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY t^CH 1 OF THE LICENSE YEAR. ASSOCIATION INFORMATION 1. Association title or name (if an^ ) Big Island, A,nc. 2. Lake Minnetonka __________Bay Southeast tip of Mahpiyata Island 3. Pe*son responsible for this application: Name Ihomas A. Judd _______________Phone 473-4402 Mailing Address_____Suite 219 First National Bank Bldg., 1055 East Wavzata Blvd«- Relationship to association Member, Attorney____________________—. Page 1 of 5 'V. T'-l te?‘ ■V, u ll ■ ■ :. f ' f|v. t‘h:,. ?f.j* ■ ;Sr ’^“: ( <• 'Ai: -pi #m^: m-^i^ k. l*i‘; Association Is (check anplicahle iteirs):3 a J unincorporated hoineovner's group 4rr/-.-. .'v#« T Incorporated Homeovner's Associal/io^n.-r* •- unincorporated club or recreation group X incorporated club cr recreation group 5. Principal purpose of joint use dock is (check applicable items): provide boat mooring and lake access for residential property. provide svimming access, beach, or offshore dock. X provide a club or association gathering place for activities 6. Dock is located on (check applicable item): one member's pri'/ate property. easement or out lot oviTied in common. property leased by the group/asscciatioa. X property ovned by the group/association. 7. List Dock location and ovnership information: street address RL 19, RL ^ I legal propei .-y description PID » 22-117-23-42-0019 22-117-23-42-0020 listed property ovner(s) Big Island, Inc. 8. Names of abutting lakeshore property owners: Exhibits A & B (North/West) (Name -t Address) (South/East) (Name + Address) Names of other affected property owners £EE_ahacheii_sheeis(Name + Address) (attach sheet if necessary) 2 of 5 =f-= V, ?*•■.;» ^n--. ■■■■•-U' • fe pM I/' I t- *G'- p- |: I ' * I 1^ .1^.-p,: r f' :V-. -' s's C^.; "? • • Sy-*-. kPv •t ^.:' ■w m' Hr-0, -0, Is ^ « ■ 5p/ v - jTi<f^r rie0p-t-:-fk'.:kk:m.iP' Insurance Coverage - The Jointly used dock is insured by one ofthe fol^wing: I a •*'.n ' . • ■' ••=■nroperty ovner's hoineovner’s polic3(^;t* 1 ; ■“ %JX separate group/association o-Tied l/^cy. "“"(Note: Each member is required to furnish certificate of insurance to dock at list the folloving information: facility.) ii<iin*» of insured Big Is land ^ Inc. — name of insurance carrier Western World Insurance Co._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -.. of insurance agency Insurance Consulting Services policy no. GLA 314475 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 10. effective date of coverage 6/29/90 (1 vr. ” ' coverage amount of coverage; Public liability, per person, per occurence $5QQ.QQQ.QQ — Plus Excess Public liability, per occurence $ 500,000.00__ Security and policing of the Jointly used dock and property is provided by (check applicable items): fencing. X__ security lighting. property owner's presence. contract sec’ority ser/ice. other (specify)___________________________________ DOCK INFORMATION 11. List Dock Use Area Specifications: Width of shoreline; 1,500+ ft. Length of main dock from shore; 125 Dock setbacks from side property lines at shore; 500+_____ Dock Construction (check applicable items): ft. and 500+ ft. ft. 12. X seasonal dock (relocated or replaced each year). permanent piling with seasonal deck. _ _ permanent piling and decking. wooden decking. _ _ metal decking. 13. List Dock Accessories: Number of fire extinguishers available at the dock Boats required to have Number of life preservers available at the dock Boats required to have 14. List number of slips in each category ("slips" includes beat lifts): •eoeh dock ^ Transient (day use only) slips 1 5 Transient (day use) off-shore buoys Permanent moorage slips Dry storage (rack) slips ■total—30 0 Permanent moorage off-shore buoys •eaek Maximum number of boats at)®i0P dock 15 W 'A-:- tot-a-l— 15. List number of off-street parking spaces available for users of the Joint use dock. Parking, if provided must not be separated from the dock by any public road. _0___spaces. 'fe ‘EROSION AND SEDIMESTATTON CONTROL 16, Shoreline is protected "by (check applicaole items): V j. * II gg>QTjy> 1 * • metsl seawall*X stone rip rap. _ _wooa se-wax_. - - (partial) corcrete seawall. grass and vegetation only, other (specify) ’• ‘V 17. f . . Depth of water at shoreline is at 100 ft. out is 20 ft.. ft; at 50 ft. out is aixioxj 10' IH:. r-:5 .-.r^v AW.XJ »*■ V* I J 'Squired attachments The following must accompany this application: A. DOCK PLAN - ALL APPLICATIONS »'• A dock plan, drawn to scale, showing the shoreline width of this property, the side property lines and the location, layout and dimensions of all docks, slips buoys. If off-street parking, dry storage or other on-land functions are intended, these also should be shown on the plan. B.UNINCORPORATED GROUPS OR ASSOCIATIONS list of the names and mailing addresses of all members and/or slip users. i 2. r* A certified copy of the by-laws or agreement for joint use. Note: This copy is not required if the applicant initials and certifies the following statement: "This is a renewal application and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same by-laws or agreement originally made in _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (state year) and on file with the City." Applicant’s initials C.INCORPORATED CLUBS OR ASSOCIATIONS 1. A list of the names, mailing addresses and titles of all corporation officers. ' V i' 2.A Statement as to the total number of members in the club or association. 40 members. 3. ir A certified copy of the articles of incorporation and by-laws of the corporation. Note: These copies are not required if the applicant initials and certifies the following statement: "This is a renewal application and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same articles of incorporation and/or by-laws as originally made or last cunendcd in _ _ _ _ _ (state year) and on file with the City.” ■‘"i-Applicant's initials m ■•m 9'--' -• Ehresident:—Pat Hanily 2660 Orchard Lane Excelsior, MN 55331 Secretary:Norm Larson 27750 Woodside Road Excelsior, MN 55331 ¥ii:- Treasurer: fe;p ii- Alan Tollefson 2931 Washta Bay Road Excelsior, MN 55331 Vice Pres.Jean Meuller 401 Lafayette Excelsior, MN 55331 Page 4 of 5 B'/• ^ piu-; ■ to ■;P?'- ,■-•*te-f-vt'-"' . .. . ■« f. :yt: ,p" fr; iv #■ i k?- ¥ •^-:’j i:W -fV» ■p?" S''%, p.' ■ ti^. M- K . ■• K ■^''‘ m' 1^- :^' K-' m' it::, li^ltv tf,‘.'.' • s if': '•t ■ S.T-- . •r t/- 1^41 > ■■ jtf: > : . :*^:'.> !:'-V ‘ - •■: S / ilii Rr'if' / sM*ir / a ;■" i)•t^ r •,**\ 'c.-."O D, ANNUAL LICENSE FEE - ALL APPLICATIONS ro- 3^ - go Joint Use Dock License Application fee according to the current City Fee Schedule .-- OO INITIAL APPLICATION PEE $-SO(y RENEWAL JOINT USE FEE, per year $_ _ _ _ PLUS SLIP FEE for each permanent moorage slip, lift, dry stack, or buoy sl^s § $2.00 each $ \. • t.C^ TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION $ f^r -fsrAC- LATE FEE - Renewals Applications for renewal of licenses shall be made no later than February 1 of the license year. The City sha 11 not accept^ renewal license applications received after March ^ unless the application is accompanied by a late fee of $25.00. REVIEW PROCEDURE Whon a complete application is received, the application will be reviewed by the City Council and, in the case of new or unusual app1icaitons, also by the Planning Commission and Marina Committee. The Council will pass upon the application after complete review. THE SUBJECT DOCK MAY BE INSTALLED AND/OR OPENED FOR USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Joint Use Dock License Application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and the City's employees and agents to enter upon the property at any reasonable time to perform safety and code compliance inspectio Signed Date &ji^l fqo Page 5 of 5 p/ -.♦.-t^;:- IJ1. X ■' vt4.* Li ■■'*iii- t- * l---< ■ u 4 '•l' r S’!'I: y- r<>-. s. Ln;’'' i“'' r ■ li- ;-i:' // ./ o oA \W V-V r. 4-v' CITY of ORONO Munkipsl Offices Pm OfBoe Bok 66 Crystal Bay, Mlnneott 5S323-< I • :s»< February 10, 1992 Mr. Thomas C. Judd Lamberb & Boeder 1000 Superior Blvd., Suite 300 Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Re:Big Island, Inc. - Cr.P - Joint Use Dock License Biq Island Record Lots #12 and 19 (PID #22-117-23 42 0319 6 #22-117-23 42 0020) Dear Mr. Judd: Last fall. Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth advised me you wo “l^ be in contact regarding Bio Island, Inc.'s application for an O^ono annual Joint Use Dock license. Apparently that g®®Permitanv fee in 1990 as part of your Conditional Use Permit XreUcatloi HO. 1606. At the conclusion f Z%Tto ITfTr proces^sing, with a note that said you would t^e cnck haven't heard from you and we are currently reviewing Joint Use bock licenses for 1992, I am sending a new application Updated infoLation and signatures. Please also attach a diagram of your proposed 1992 dock layout. Jeanne is currently reviewing your ®PP ^ the “three calculated and duly paid. She wil >»««■{« ehat the 1991discrepancies, however, I am proceeding on the basis that the I3»i application fee has been paid. Your 1992 application fee will be considered The renewal fee is $20.00. There is no per slip fee, because these Ire Considered as transient rather than permanent slips since no boats vill be permanently docked. Our Deputv Clerk informs me that neither you or a Tnc have siqned the CUP Resolutions so that they can become^effective and be filed at the County. The Resolution copies TELEPHONE - 473-7357 • FAX • 473.0510 i Mr. Thomas C. Hudd February 10» 1992 Page 2can be signed at the city offices, any weekday between 8:00 a.m. and 4s30 p.nie ^ 1. i-' I am enciosing a copy of the c"o°n\fct «eVt"^73-7V57°if” reference purposes. and 520.00 fee should S"sub«!tted b^ Marcrist in 'order that review and approval can occur prior to the boating season . Sincerely# Jaa~^ Michael P. Gaffron , . . ^ a.Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator MPG/ch Enc. - Joint Use Dock License Application Form Application Submitted in 1990 cc:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Adm. uTo Island. Inc. - P.O. Box 188, Excelsior, MN 55331 Rachel Thibault, Lake Minnetonka Conservation District ii ■ V p> -: • I*-’" iO/ •a ii- ^r r"’ %m 5 . ■life'-' ■ i7/C:r-sf7'-M " — j-ei----.A‘ -taf i,' ..kl. V, yrsi.' Vi . ¥■ t-r '•• > '/ n • r. ^ :ik ■ I' -'V.. w. I'--. ,’i !*■ CITY of OKONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.3006 A RBSOLUnON GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.31, SUBDIVISION 3 (C) AND VARIANCES TO SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 t PILES #1606 & 1660 $r WHEREAS, Thomas-^ Judd, an authorized agent of^Big Island Inc., a Minnesota corporation, (hereinafter the applicant-) has an interest in the property located on Brg Island, Orono classification. Record Lots 12 and 19, within t e City of Orono (hereinafter "City ”) and legally described as follows: Refer to Exhibit A, attached (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, per Section 10.31, Subdivision 3 (C) the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a conditional use oerniit to allow a day use recreation area with occasional over night camping at a maximum user level of 100 and variances to Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2 that would allow the repair of an existing swimming dock/deck located within the 0-75' lake- shore protected area where no structures or hardcover are allowed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS ■ ■> J 1. These applications were reviewed as Zoning Files #1606 and 1660. 2. The property is located in the RS Seasonal Recreational Zoning District. Per Section 10.31, Subdivision 3 (C)l One acre in area is needed for each 20 users. The day use recreation facility will be limited to 100 users based on the existing 5.02 acres. ’.1'. -• 3. On July 15, 1991, tht Oror.o Planning Conunission reviewed the applications as proposed and recommended approval based on the following findings: .Si..' Ips' Page 1 of 5 h ■'■''„,v • ^■r V .♦.. •/; L-■’■'.• •■K(r: •‘VV,a-' ^ v; ”>• f.V.' V^/ r->- CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3006__________ A) The 5.02 acre site is large enough to support a day use recreation area and occasional overnight camping use without any adverse effect upon the lake or upon the adjacent wetlands located within the western portion of the subject property. B) The proposed use will have no negative impact upon the neighboring adjacent properties. C) Based on the proposed level of use, the fire protection system developed by the Orono staff for ^ j.g Island and the bylaws developed by applicant will provide the necessary precautionary steps to maintain the public safety and welfare. D) The proposed use will require no variances to the required standards set forth in Section 10.31, Subdivision 3 (C). Shall sustain structural repairs only. F) The only flat usable land portion of lakeshore is 15—20' above the lake level. The swimming doc provides area for parencs to supervise children swimming in lake. G) The large, rocky shoreline prevents persons from using existing shoreline. affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other neighboring properties, nor will its use - surrounding property values and that <^be proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the inten objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of tne City. Page 2 of 5 ^ lArt i I ■nil ' p •• 6^I fj' :| ff- I” IV t' • ' I ■ 0\\CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5. The City council finO* that the --^„j,tions^existi^^^^^ this property are zoning district; that granting the to other Proper y ^ ^ existing swiirating dock would Sfelt traffic conditions, light, air nor pose not adversely affect trai neighboring properties; a fire hazard or other oanag applicant, would not merely a demonstrable hardship or Si"f%t^l\T\”n^ec^essVr^- preserve a s-stantial property gfi. r,r=-.“ of the City. "th^e fi°ndfn“s fnd ?e%"o— staff -^;sTr"t'ife ta^^^r^s^^^rt"y!and the affect of the proposed use on the heaitn, and welfare of the community. CONCLOSIONSp ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above Municipal City council hereby grants » 3 “- vr:hr,rs,-i'A.iuriT'.ir;in"^ '’"r‘rA'«.».«• following conditions; 1. Big island Inc. shall be limited S^'jrfp^iSaVl*Of this cond^h^onal use V. Si/.. 2. Applicant shall file a special lot combination of Record Lots 12 and 19 with the City. 3. If at any time » Vo^rert"^t'^t^rf^^^^i?y^ ?e^‘Ant?b\%%ginro?tL"Vsstc^^^^^^^^^ apply for a large assembly permit at the City of Orono. Page 3 of 5 m:i-x-- 5. Applicant shall provide P"''?ubjec/?c C^rs|tc!af°sranTards‘dele"^ped“for^[s^^ ^?^irp^°o"te=tlon 3^ntp^?ri/^ranr''wate^r‘’,^\Schet and blanket. ^^^d“h“no\s^L “Ul-a 7e?arer^o^^.erershtn “y?y \“ ?evie^pr?o? ?o formal action by board of Big Island Inc. ’;op\“r\y°ntrw\^h""fa%"pl'’/caft:%u7« i^piv^^-r^\^-s%‘;il*l^con|tIons Jf^ t\^ ^r^ ol°tlion will expire on that date (August 26, 1992). 8. Violation of or non-compliance with any ^of^J:he t^^^ conditions of ^®®°^'iV?"aut‘^„,atic terminate anyof the inning Code, shall automata ^„nishable as a authority granted herein, and sna t> misdemeanor. 9. The undersigned rSlolutTolTanrin b^'half of Big Island ®"=rVhf| ?e"s^olVtlin-iV tJ:e“c;tL 7/trt\e^°of p«p°erty. Adopted by the Orono City Council on tnis 26th day of August, 1991. Lty Clerk Barbara A. J^terson, Mayo Edward J- Callahan, Jr., Acting Mayor Thomas -€•. Judd,(A an Authorized Agent ot Big Island xnc • ^ Page 4 of 5 -• . iP * •r ■ . • S'*- ■U -^04^ t I' u. ■' fe-r t r; :^' i:-. 4-' \y i ^ CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3006 __________ STATE OP MINNESOTA ) ) Edward J. Callahan, Jr Acting MayorCOUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoina instrximent was acknowledged ^ this 26th ?ay of August, 1991, by :G„rci^V"'co”^^oratio‘;^^ - of the City. NOTARY^p(Su<f - MWNCSOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY My commlMteti tJipIfW 8-12-96 Notary Puolic STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. A . . 199 On this /Co~^^_ _ _ _ _ _—■_j^Pri. eaid county) pers^ally before me a Notary til Big Island Inc, u appeared '®'- deLrib^ and who^ executed the frr^,o\n"*in%°tr:ment,^nd acknowledged tbat he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. I HENNEPN ooukty 1 (7^ Notary Public Page 5 of 5 vu-ii: .... *nm •- j *.. m S¥- B"n te ■ >■ isM * ♦ * * * « ►>.* w*^ **• 'Ism RESOLUTION ^f3006 .HIBIT A All that part or ’ j- 1 , Rea-rangement of Lot 1, Kitchel s Subdivision of Gcvernmei. - Lots 5 and 6 in Section 22, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin Councy, Minnesota lying soutnwesterly on a ine Kitchel's Subdivision, and also all of Lots 6, 7, a, '^S . ' - 13 14 and 15, Rearrangement of Loc 1, Kitchel s Subdivision or Government Lots 5 and 6, Section 22, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnes"'*'!. Lots 2, 3, 4, 5 and that part of Lot 1, lying Northeasterly o^ a line running from the most Northwasterxy corner of Lot 7 to the midcoint of the Northwesterly line of said Lot 1, ® Realranqement of Lot 1, Kitchel's Subdivision in Government Lots 5 Rearrangemenr o 'ny, r. 23, according to the recorded plat hereof on file aAd of record in the office cf the County Recorder. Hennepin County, Minnesota. tllTf 111 ^•rr r;T:fi • »Ml» iWiTi iwra a& TO:Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator PROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administratoi^^^ July 28, 1992 Styrofoam Dock Flotation Ordinance List of Exhibits A - Ordinance in Adoption Format B - Councilmember Callahan's Proposal with Revisions Adopted 7/27/92 Discussion Attached is the properly formatted ordinance adopted on a vote of 3 ayeSf 0 nays, and one abstention by the Council at the July 27th meeting. The ordinance has been placed in Subsection 9.58, Chapter 9 deals with Public Protection, Crimes and Offenses, and in staff's opinion this is an appropriate chapter for this ordinance. The ordinance reference to Section 9.21 actually refers to the language contained in Section 9.21 prior to May 9, 1988. The proposed ordinance revision of Section 9.21 and addition of 9.23 to restore such language is the subject of a separate proposed ordinance on the August 10th agenda. Now that staff has had a chance to review the ordinance as adopted, staff would note the following comparison to earlier drafts: The adopted ordinance contains no provision for interim containment or cleanup measures. B.The adopted deadline for removal of existing styrofoam will allow its use only until the end of 1994, allowing approximately 2 1/2 years of continued use from the date of adoption. C.The ordinance as adopted does not differentiate between private and commercial uses, and therefore by implication applies to both. The use of foam types other than bead styrofoam is not addressed, thereby implying such foams are not prohibited, which meets with the staff's previous intent. fe If"' ' felvv:;:. ♦ r«K«] 'mT=Ju1#] r -t* I f-- f. % I-I';.- ORDINANCE #2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING SECTION 9.58, PROHIBITING THE USE OP NON-ENCASED STYROFOAM AS A DOCK FLOTATION DEVICE The City Council of Orono ordains as follows: Section 1. The City of Orono Municipal Code, Chapter 9, is hereby amended by addi’ g Section 9.58 to read as follows: Section 9.58 Stvrofoam Dock Flotation Prohibition. Subd. 1. Preamble. The City hereby determines 1) that disintegration of non-encased styrofoam flotation blocks used in docks, swimming platforms, buoys, and other floating structures in the City of Orono has led to the disintegrating particles washing up onto shoreland in Orono in substantial and unsightly quantities endangering the comfort and enjoyment of the affected property owners and causing environmental and aesthetic damage, and generally unsightly and undesirable public conditions; 2) that such disintegration is a natural characteristic of the styrofoam described when used for flotation purposes in the City limits; 3) that such disintegration is accelerated by the actions of aquatic animals and waterfowl and, in turn, constitutes a hazard to their well-being; 4) that additional health and safety concerns can occur if such material is subject to heat, gasoline or other petroleum products; and 5) the use of non-encased styrofoam for the purpose mentioned above is a public nuisance within the meaning of Orono City Code, Chapter 9, Subsection 9.21. Subd. 2. Definition. For the purpose of this section, non- encased styrofoam means any brand of expanded polystyrene beads molded into a block, sheet, billet, or other shape which is not completely encased in a permanent casing, coating, or container capable of withstanding action by ice or other elerants, animals, and normal activity by users so that disintegration of the molded shapes into smaller chunks or individual beads is prevented. Subd. 3. Use of Non-c.ncased Styrofoam Prohibited. A. It is a misdemeanor for any person to use non-encased styrofoam blocks, sheets, billets or other shapes for dock construction or flotation, swimming platforms, buoys o* other floating or similar structures in lakes or streams in ti.,j City, whether such uses are permanent or seasonal in nature. B. This ordinance shall apply to such uses after the date of the adoption of this ordinance except when owners of such non- encased styrofoam materials who are presently using them in the City for purposes forbidden by this ordinance may continue to use them for such purposes in existing structures currently containing them until December 31, 1994. This exception does not include repair or replacement of existing styrofoam. Section 2. Adoption and Publication. This ordinance shall take effect and shall be enforced from and after the date of its adoption and publication. Adopted by the City Council of Orono on this 27th day of July# 1992, by a vote of 3 ayes, 0 nays, and one abstention. J. Diann Goetten, Acting Mayor Attest: Dorothy N. Hallin, City Clerk is.m i* - ’ ’ ■ m rs5t \f^'-¥ '■ ^'* :■ hi N |5'-ik''iSk I? f ■ ii- I t ^ > /Ovcn^'n.-3-0 ^1 ’ ’I ■ ■ . • ' \ X *: *.' —» • GdCtion 1. City o£ Orono Municipal Code, Chapter 9, is hdroby amondod by adding Subsection 9^57 to ,2-?. Subdivision 1. Preamble. Tlie City hexeby determines 1) that disintegration of non-encaaed styrofoam flotation blocks used in docks# swimming platform^ and other floating structures in the City of Orono has lead to the disintegrating particles washing up onto shoreland in Orono in substantial and unsightly quantities endangering the comfort and enjoyment of the affected property owners and causing environmental and aesthetic damage# and generally unsightly and undesirable public conditions; 2) that such disintegration is a natural characteristic of the I: Styrofoam described when used for flotation purposes in 3) that such disintegration is accelerated by the actions of aquatic animals and waterfowl and, In turn, constitutes a hazard to tlieir well being; 4) that additional health and safety concerns can occur if such material is subject to heat, gasoline or otlier ^4iuiiiiuUTs and 5) the use of non-encased styrofoam for the purpose mentioned above la a public nuisance within the meaning of Orono City Code. Chapter 9/ Subsectionion^9t2r^ Subdivision 2. Definitional For the purpose of this subsection, non-encased styrofoam means any brand of expanded polystyrene beads molded into a block, sheet, billet, or other shape which la not completely encased in a permanent casing. -m.. - -- coatinfl, or eontalnor capable of wlth.tandln, action by ice or other element., animals, and normal activity by user, so that dialntegretlon of the molded .hape. into smaller chunks or individual baada is pravantad. Subdivision 3. A. It is a misdemeanor for any per.on to uae non-enca.ed •tyrofoem blocks, sheets, billet, or other ehaps, for dock construction or flotation, .wimmin, platform,,^^ther floating or Similar structure, in lake, or streams in the City, whether ouch uooo ara parmanent or seasonal in nature. B. This ordinance shall apply to such usea after the date of the adoption of this ordinance tzaastL that owners of such non.enca^ad styrofoam materials who are presently using them in the City for purposes forbidden by this ordinance may continue a them for such purposes in existing structures currently containing them until December 31, 1994. TX, ^ ^ C. This ordinance shall become effective upon adoption. '^1 ^ '' , ' ^ \ *ir ^ xrf> sJ Tt ^ , J -41^ 2S52X -2- . t.' j -_ v»: ti' K- i U\ i-1 .•■ i’ r^: . P I-r- W’-rI.k I’ I' Igi^. I*. P-S: I"" ft' tftvK- I' !!;?>: %.> 'r if-- > •...• : . TO: FROM: DATES Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator /-; Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator July 29, 1992 SUBJECT: Lake Minnetonka Shoreland Ordinances - Update List of Exhibits A “ DNR Formal "Flexibility Request" Notification Letters; Orono and Minnetrista B - City of Woodland Preliminary Flexibility Request C - City of Spring Park Preliminary Flexibility Request Status of Orono*s Ordinance Attached is a copy of the letter from Pick to the other Lake Minnetonka cities which formally triggers the forty-five day response period. Midway through the process, DNR determined that once cities have submitted their flexibility request to the DNR, the DNR would review it and then the DNR would be responsible for sending the flexibility request to neighborxng cities for comment. This policy was not formulated at the time we sent our flexibility request to the other cities, hence to some extent they are duplicating our efforts. While this is not a problem, it does seem to extend the timeframe before they will formally approve our ordinance. I have yet to receive the previously indicated letter from TNR discussing minor "housekeeping" concerns they have with our ordinance. I presume this will get to us at the end of the forty-five day period which is approximately September 2nd. At the point which they are prepared to formally approve our ordinance, we ill have to do the minor revision to revise the slope criteria from 18% to 12%. Status of Other City's Shoreland Ordinances Minnetrista's informal flexibility request was reviewed by Council in July. Attached is a copy of the formal notification for review. Since we have already reviewed this, I will do nothing more than cc a copy of ray letter to Jay Blake (copy attached) to the DNR. Wood].and presented their flexibility request to the technical review committee on July 28th. A copy of their informal flexibility request is attached, and appears to be relatively minor in scope and impact. ■f ' .jr... .. I i' XI■w1 ri V .t, k i.>*: V-A ^- K--;-. K _ V?v. m Memo July 29, 1992 Page 2 Spring Park's consulting planners presented their flexibility request on July 29th. I would encourage Council to carefully review the memo from Alan Brixius. As we expected. Spring Park has an existing level of development that is nowhere near the DNR's goals. The thrust of their proposal is to continue the existing level of development, which they claim is needed to survive economically, and they suggest that they be given consideration for providing multiple family housing alternatives and coininercial opportunities that have not been made available by other communities around the lake. While no formal response is required at the moment. Council may wish to begin considering what response to the Spring flexibility request might be appropriate when the formal flexibility request notice is received from DNR. Wayzata apparently has been in discussion with DNR regarding their informal submittal but the technical review committee has seen none of that information to-date. Tonka Bay , Minnetonka Beach, Shorewood , and Mound are expected to be presenting their ordinances and flexibility requests in September. The remaining cities (Excelsior, Minnetonka , Greenwood , Victoria , and Deephayen ) appear to be making slower progress. Staff Recommendation No action is required at this time. "i:.-r-f' h - !<;■ I Ml f; PHONE NO. Same letter sent to all names on attached lists ^ STATE OF ^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES WATERS, 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN ^5106_ _ (612) 772-7916.'■( f ; file no: ‘■'(■•-I July 17, 1992 The Honorable Nich olas Duff Mayor, City of Woodland 2830 Maplewood Road Wayzata, MN 55391 JUi 2 0 1992 Dear Mayor Duff: REVIEW AND COMMENT ON CITY STATE OF MINNESOTA'S SHORE y 6f ( LMin ORONO’S REQUEST FOR FLEXIBILITY FROM rtAN^GEriENT STANDARDS As required by the statewide shoreland management standards, the Connissioner of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and the City of Orono are hereby notifying your city of Orono's request for flexibility from the statewide standards as outlined below. In accordance with the rules, the Commissioner and the city must solicit the input and approval of other governmental bodies that could be affected or impacted by the alternate controls. The city and the DNR are asking that you provide your review and ccmiDents, if any, to either DTTR or the city within 4 5 days of the date of this letter. If no response is received prior to then, we will assume that your city has no concerns with the neighboring city's proposal. The City of Orono is requesting flexibility from the following statewide standards: 1. Reduction of setbacks from city streets and roads. The statewide standards require 20 foot setbacks whereas the city has allowed up to 10 foot setbacks in existing development. Thus, if flexibility from this standard is not allowed, many ejcisting structures would become nonconforming structures. 2. Increase in the structure heicht limit. Statewide standards require that a 25 foot height limit be applied to all new structures in residential land use districts in cities. The city is requesting the use of flexibility to allow structures a height limit of 30 feet in residential land use districts, again to keep many existing residences already constructed above the 25 foot limit from becoming nonconforming structures. The maximum allowable structure height under the "old" state shoreland rules v. \s 3 5 feet. Review of Flexibility Request Page (2) 3. Elimination of the setback requirement for a specific type of water oriented accessory structure. The city is asking for flexibility to allow lock boxes (used to store boat and beach equipment) which are limited to 20 square feet in area and 48 inches in height to be setback anywhere within the shore impact zone. The statewide standards require that any water oriented accessory g^j^\j[ctures located within the shore impact ^one ^ be gg'tback at least 10 feet landward of the ordinary high water level of any public waters. 4. Relaxation of the statewide standards requiring that impervious cover in the shoreland area be limited to 25%. The city i- stating that it will prohibit any impervious cover, witi» the exception of the 20 square foot lock box described above, and stairways not exceeding 4 feet in width, in the first 75 feet of shoreland landward of the ordinary high water level. The statcvide minimum of 25 % impervious cover wou?d be allowed in the next 250 feet. The city is then requesting that it be allowed to increase the impervious limit up to 30% in the area located from 250 feet to 500 feet landward, and up to 35% impervious cover for all remaining shoreland located more than 500 feet landward of the ordinary high water level of the pul lie waters. The maximum allowable impervious surface coverage under the "old** state shoreland rules was 30%. Orono has presented its requests for review DNR ^i^th its city staff and representatives of 11 Lake Minnetonka cities who working together as a Technical Review Committee for the purpose of reviewing and discussing Lake Minnetorka flexibility requests. No problems with the city's request have oeen noted at any of thos meetings. AS stated earlier, please have -ppropriate proposed flexibility request and, if necessa^, ^ - comments to me at the address listed above MikI there are any questions, clil Stra^^^Gaffron, Orono*s Assistant City Planner at 437-7357, Ceil Strauss of this office at 772-7910, or me at 772-7916. Sincerely, ^ Edward L. Fick Shoreland Hydrologist cc: John Line Stine, Regional Hydrologist Ogbazghi Slum, Supervisor, Land nss Management unit Sandy Langley, Administrator/Clerk rf ! fe ^ tei' ■ ;i‘ I i .*': I •'.n y. W: ;i. ’ > •; s.•. ,.*•! yr is Same letter sent to all names on attached lists if*' STATE OF lk!M[iS®TrzSi ^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES PHONE NO,WATERS, 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 55106 filHno (612) 772-7916 July Id, 1992 The Honorable "Dick" Engebretson Mayor, city of Deephaven 3340 Maplewood Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Dear Mayor Engebretson: °soS-s AS required by the statewide shoreland management standards, ^e ^B^i«ioner of the Minnesota D-partnent of Nati^ai and the Citv of Minnetrista are hereby notifying yoxir cx^ of Mimetrista's request for flexibility from the statewide standards afSJtUnel Iell2! In accordance with the rules, the Commissioner and toe city must solicit the input and approval of °ther gSvernnental bodies that could be affected or impacted by the Ilternlte controls. The city and the DKR are asking that you SroviSfyo.^ review and comments, if any, to either DNR or «>e city Sitoin 45 days of the date of this letter. If no response is revived prior to then, we will assume that your city has no concarns with the neighboring city's proposal. The City of Minnetrista is requesting flexibility from the following statewide standards: 1.Increase in the structure height limit. The statewide standards require that a 25 foot height limit be applied existing residences already constructed beyond the 25 foot limit from becoming nonconforming st^ctiires. The maximum allowable structure height under the old state shoreland irules was 35 feet. 2.c°o'ver“'to lhTs*hii\an^^r^“f^b\ Beach and shown on the city's zoni.ng map district R-2 DB. This area has been previously platted in'-o 40 to 60 foot wide lots which makes redevelopment difficult without the flexibility to ^“P^^this cover up to 35^?. The city has acquired 12 lots in this AN EO'JAL OPOORTUNITY EMPLOYER ^ jZ i\ • IS’--" Wn'i^SSSriii-v ^m-p-;' gt--'’-'m Mayor Raviev of Flexibility Request July 16, 1992 Page (2) fpm if. 'i'. bm':. area through tax forfeiture and is beginning to compensate for exceeding the statewide standards in this fashion. The maximum allowable impervious sxirface coverage under the "old" state shoreland rules was 30%. - ? Mlnnetrista has presented its requests for review by DNR with its city staff and representatives of 11 Lake Minnetonka cities who are working together as a Technical Review Committee for the purpose of reviewing and discussing Lake Minnetonka flexibility requests. No problems with the city's request have been noted at any of those meetings. &ii • > \ ....... .‘•St •• ' Am stated earlier, please have appropriate staff review the proposed flexibility request and, if necessary, provide your comments to me at the address listed above within 45 days. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to contact ei'her Jay Blake, Minnetrista• s City Planner at 446-1660, Ceil stra* of this office at 772-7910, or me at 772-7916. m.. it’ . '%'■ Sincerely, Edwerc' L. ' ick Shorelar^' Hydrologist cc: :v iW- John Line Stine, Regional Hydrologist Ogbazghi Sium, Supervisor, Land Use Management Unit -y. S*5iW p lr¥'l: ■k..' ■ !V ip:"’'’ ^ *" 1 ‘i.- i 7i ,«;.*■ If- ■ h't :ri.hyy- v ’’' i;;-** *v • /’ li-fe?,*.!:. *■ ’■ ii|{^a;?';..Vvv" K> -ii^-fey! ®sassa r*' L^H'Iv 'V i’ ' 'V' - -.; - • City of Woodland20225 Cottagewood Road Deephaven, MN SS33 1 /^1 Ways Woodland is More Restrictive than Required: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Minimum Lot Size: DNR: 20,000 sq. ft. for Lake Minnetonka riparian lots. 40,000 sq. ft for all other lots. Woodland: 87,120 sq. ft. for all lots. (Exceptions: Assembly Grounds & existing "grandfothered lots"). Structure Setbacks from Wetlands other than "Public Waters": DNR: None Woodland: 25 ft from any protected wetland. Structure Setbacks from Public Roads: DNR: 20 ft. from right-of-way for town roads. 50 ft. from right-of-way for county or state roads. Woodland: 50 ft. front yard (defined as side abutting road). Sewage Treatment System Setbacks: DNR: 75 ft from OHWL (Marion & Shavers) 50 ft. from OHWL (Minnetonka). Woodland: 75 ft from OHWL all 3 lakes. 25 ft from all wetlands. Impervious Surface Limitation: DNR: 25% of lot Woodland: 25% of lot. Total building area (ail structures) limited to 10% of lot size. Water Accessory Structures: DNR: Area: 250 sq. ft. Height: 10ft. Width: No restriction. Woodland: Pump house or boat house — not both. Boat House: Area. 250 sq. ft. Height: 10ft. Width: 10% of shoreline (20 ft. max.). Pump house: Area: 30 sq. ft. Height: 5 ft. Minimum Lot Size for Guest House: DNR: 17,500 to 35,000 sq. ft. Woodland: 87,120sq.ft. ■1 M . y. . tjt.'A Ill liii m K*rU:s: ■*- U’:< |i- lis.feli" ■ r----^ ■ City of Woodland 20225 Cottagewood Road Deephaven, MN 55331 Desired Flexibility (Lake Minnetonka Shoreland) 1. Structure Setback from Lake Minnetonka (OHWL) DNR: 75 ft. fi-om OHWL if not sewered (50 ft. if sewered). Woodland: 50 ft. fiom OHWL, and 75 ft. for sewage treatment systems Bationalfi;The only justification apparent for the greater setbacks from the lake for structures in non-sewered areas seems to be protection of the lake from sewage pollution. Woodland will apply the 75 ft. setback to the sewage treatment system rather than the structure, and because of the much larger lot size in Woodland such treatment system placement is possible. Any visual impaa of structures as viewed from the lake is limited by Woodland's requirement of larger lots, and also by the city's requirements that buildings cover no more than 10% of the lot. 2. Lot Width: DNR: 100 ft. lot width for Minnetonka riparian lots. \ ^ 150 ft. lot width for non-riparian lots. ^ ' Woodland: 100 ft. lot width at OHWL and at front building line. Rationale:Since Woodland requires 2 acre lots, the setting of a 150 ft. minimum lot width is not needed. Woodland also requires 25 ft. side yards and 50 ft. from throughout the chy. Therefore it is highly unlikely that anyone would propose a lot width of less than 150 ft. We choose to apply a uniform standard throughout the city. 3. Building Height Limit: DNR: 25 ft. using the Uniform Building Code system of measurement. Woodland: 35 ft. using averaging of heights of each side from the lowest adjacem ground on side to highest point of roof above. There also would be a itiaaritnum of 45 ft. from the lowest adjacent grade to the highest point of the roof Rationale:The 35 ft. limit is needed in areas such as Woodland and nearby cities where property is already fully developed and very large houses are common. Our system of measurement nuiy actually be more restrictive than that prescribed in the Uniform Building Code. Also. Woodland requires larger lots and restricts the total for all structures to 10% of the lot area. ■■ ' .PM rD ■pfl&“0sMm Exceptions for Groveiand Assembly Grounds:Woodland: Continue to set much lower minimum lot sizes and setbacks for theAssembly Grounds.Rationale: Woodland currently requires much smaller minimum lot sizes andsetbacks in this sm^ area, and it already is fully developed. The Groveiand Homeowners Association maintains a wide lakefront area free of structures, and also maintains considerable other open space. Woodland 7/14/92 #■■ ■ • : isisS;-'.:" 0mm?- m'"'"'m? fc® • • 1#':: ws?? miY: ■■ Associated Consultants. Inc.ING* DESIGN* MARKET RESEARCH FILE COPE rechnical Review Committee Brixius Ly 1992 j Park - Shoreland Flexibility Recjuest - 92.01 lly developed community having only 13.8 t land remaining. The City has developed icluding single family, multiple family, ring uses^ over its history. Future I to be primarily infill development. development of the City, the direct sland standards would result in non- in all zones. The potential for much or non-conforming coir^licates landowners' !nt, and affects the City's tax base. if Spring Park is requesting flexibility 'ds in the following areas: ■*14 verage m •MsJ y is based on background technical data nventoried and which is used to specify ich the City will require flexibility. IStrate how Spring Park will address each ts Zoning Ordinance. Jis Park, MN 55416 • (612) 595-9636-Fax. 595-9837 •f ». 0S&. fe. llr.'' *ife.. %r„ w te-s- W' LOT smBxintlna Conditions. Due to the historical development of Spring Park with small lot lake cottages, over two-thirds of the lots in Spring Park are under 15,000 square feet. Table 1 illustrates existing City lot sizes. The historical develofsnent of the shoreline with snail lots has also created a housing density which is higher than allowed by DNR shoreland standards. Current City policy controls development on substandard lots and encourages lot consolidation. TABLE 1 EXISTING R-1, R-2, R-3 LOT SIZES Lot Siae in Square Feet 9,999 or Less 10.000 - 14,999 15.000 - 19,999 20.000 or More Total Number of Lots 102 61 35 55 253 TABLE 2 EXISTING R-1, R-2, R-3 LOT WIDTHS Lot W:^dth 50 51 61 76 100 Under 60 75 100 Above Total Number of Lots 109 62 33 30 19 253 Table 2 represents the existing condition of lot widths for parcels within the R-l, R-2, and R-3 Districts. One hundred seventy-one lots or 66 percent of the lots are 60 feet wide or less. Only 19 lots are 100 feet wide or greater. As can be seen from the existing lot size and width tsUbles, the majority of the lots are 15,000 square feet or less and under 75 feet wide. The potential ^to divide existing lo*-s is extremely limited due to the small ^rtte#%inount of existing lots large enough to divide. Wifi' 'pfv' %»■. ■ ■fl■A <S up.. >The City's current base minimum lot size is 10,000 square feet The current Zoning Ordinance limits development on substandard lots to single family only provided that:1. The lot has been assessed for sewer and water.2. Setback and yard requirements shall be in compliance.Spring Park believes reliance on setbacks and impervious surface limits control the environmental factors of development on small lots, while protecting the development rights of the prooertv owners. e- tr j Spring Park also currently has policies, which will be part of the shoreland regulations, which requires consolidation of substandard lots when reconstruction is proposed. Through this policy of lot consolidation, single family density will actually decrease over time. Spring Park hopes to continue this means of implementation to promote private redevelopment of the substandard lots. - - - - - - - - -- Spring Park's implementation will consist of retaining the existing minimum lot sizes of 10,000 square feet which currently conform to the DNR model standards for non-riparian lots and require that where applicable, substandard lots be required to be consolidated when redevelopment is proposed. Any development on substandard lots will be required to comply will all setback amd inpeivious surface stamdards. ''^4 I#Si m. i|-^ RESIDBMTIAL DENSITY _ _ _ _ Id order to determine overall compliance with the DNR density stamdards, a density calculati. .i was performed. The purpose of the residential development denti / calculation is to determine the maximum allowed by the DNR model and compare this to the existing development conditions in Spring Park. To determine the level of density increase that may be allowed, a theoretical maucimum development scenario was calculated based upon the residential density stamdards of the DNR. This exercise was recommended by the DNR in other studies as a method to con^are the City's existing shoreland development with what could be considered to be a maximum "development cap". The exercise included calculation of the gross residential zoning district acreage within Tier I and Tier Il-V properties of the Shorelamd District. Tier I properties are those which are riparian to the laUce to a depth of 200 feet from the ordinary high water level (OHWL). Tier II-V properties include the non-riparian properties 200-1,000 feet from the OHWL. m ■SA MM ► *.r» - V f■'I Wy. ■ ■•■ 'rj!'"■!■'■,' ^ ii'>">--. V-** 'C^'vK;-^''*;- if". ^'V^'V ■ I-’'".. m. i :> ^it m- P': ■Esj|» • A "4^•V SM.<.V ..te' " m: .H^'v'.' i*V,*-:r^ |t ■-:>«- It, ;C-.«,mi- • :• vv^i ^ Table 3 illustrates this exercise: TABLE 3 SPRING PARK MAXIMUM SHORELAND DENSITIES Tier I Net Area Standard Allowed Units Maximum Density Increase Maximum Allowed Units 1,415,997 94 50%141 II 1,089,098 109 100%218 III 460,998 46 200%184 IV 244,000 24 200%96 V 100,000 10 200%40 3,310,093 283 679 Existing Housing Units:937 As can be seen from Table 3, there is over development in the n\imber of residential units allowed in the shoreland area based upon the DNR density standards. There are currently 937 housing units (252 single units and 681 units in multiple family structures) in Spring Par)c while the model ordinance would only allow 283 single family units. Even with the provision of the density increase multiplier, which allows for 679 units. Spring Park is still 258 units above this limit. Due to the number of existing multiple family buildings. Spring Park cannot comply with the density standards in the DNR Ordinance. Multiple family accounts for 73 percent of Spring Parkis total housing, while single family accounts for only 27 percent. The loss of these existing multiple family units to Spring Park, if they were not allowed to rebuild to their existing density, would be detrimental to the City's population base and tax base. A loss in population would affect Spring Park through reduced State and local aid. The current population is aluo necessary to support the local economy. The City's tax base would be affected through the loss of these revenue generating properties which are needed to cover the City's debt structure of municipal services. The City has historically viewed high density residential in a positive light and as a result, would not adopt an Ordinance which would make these multiple family units non-conforming and thus limit their redevelopment potential. i _S- II-'iff ■•.f.' -■ J-'m Is-' *r th m-~-m-. I®' ''VY.'.V WiK The multiple family housing provides a unique opportunity for people who cannot afford single family homes on the lake, these housing alternatives do not readily exist in other communities around the lake. Spring Park has historically promoted high density residential development as an alternative to single feunily housing which is mostly unobtainable to many people wishing to live by the lake. This philosophy of providing different types of housing is consistent with the regional housing objectives of the Metropolitan Council. In general terms, density is to be restricted to DNR requirements or less in areas designed for low density development. In areas characterized by high density developments such as the multiple family structures that exist in the R-3 District along Shoreline Drive, residential densities may be allowed to the existing R-3 density of 13 units per acre. The Intent of the Con^rehensive Plan is to provide fcr diversity of types of residential development in order to continue the vitality and strength of Spring Park. The existing multiple family buildings that currently exceed the DNR's maximum density shall not be deemed non-conforming in regards to setbacks, density and height and may be re-established provided the setbacks, density, and height are not increased. Density will be controlled by requiring any new development or redevelofznent to comply with specific standards in the ordinance which address maximum density, lot size, impervious surface, coopliauice with storm water plan. The following pages are taken from the proposed Ordinance to regulate density within the R-i, R-2 auid R-3 Zoning Districts. In summary. Spring Park will maintain a density it can live with by maintaining conformance with setback, storm water management practices and vegetative screening. ■■■■xV"‘' V* 1''^ i V'. ■T'"‘; vi' ' .^- 1/:' ^!^.,,;o;V-'-:.rk.l^ Fr*fc.-" '.• Pll;v sAii'iSi g® Ip- ill 0B^-. iSsS-fe- gsit"'- |S#i-' IsSWk. i4«g. ■■ ■ 's Subd. S R-t Lot K^ ^ ^ ^ setbackfl. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in an "R-l" District subject to additional rec[uirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this Ordinance. 1. Lot Area: Single Family Detached Dwelling Units 10,000 sq.ft. Two-Family Dwelling Units 12,000 sq.ft. 2. Setbacks: a.Street Side: No less than thirty (30) feet. No less than fifty (50) feet when abutting a county street. b.Side Yard; No less than ten (10) feet on any side yard. No less than thirty (30) feet on the side yard abutting a public right-of-way. c.Rear Yard abutting another lot; No less th?u ten (10) feet. d.Ordinary High Water Mark: No less than fifty (50) feet. Top of Dluff: No less than thirty (30) feet. m • : iJ' ^ V . rxcY:,\ .*' ■'■■ r r- ■ I t'^1 4■ .1^1 fc.* •ii i t3| ^:l| ,i'-^pi-.te"^-' m't:te ^•- r' • ki ■rk s& M d^- - ^ il^i-'Mt Ik^vfe'v-c iftef i' m\ la#!" w 'fct - ^pfc . m'' '■ te ^ S\ibd. B R-2 p«>^»4y«wiAnt-M anfi Setbac3ca. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in an "R-2" District subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this Ordinance; 1. Lot Area: Density a. Single Family Detached Dwelling Unit 10,000 sq.ft. b. Two-Family Dwelling Units 12,000 sq.ft. c. Multiple Family (three or more dwelling units) - The maximum density for multiple family dwellings will be determined based on the following criteria. (1) Minimum base lot size is 15,000 square feet. (2) Maocimum density not to exceed twelve (12) units per acre. (3) Compliance with required building setbacks. __ __ __ _ (4) Compliance with required parking standards. (5) Conpliamce with required building height restrictions. Compliance with impervious surface standards for the respective district. Provisions for adequate on-site storm water retention and/or ron^liance with City Storm Water Management Plaui. Compliance with docking standards of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District. Minimum lot width is seventy-five (75) feet. IfistvIs-'*'te-Ha;g«mf-r 'm,: l^¥'te te-afe rr.-;-* • ■ ,19ft'.fe hKkt.^->- ■ jiWl" ',fe3fe‘Iff i|?; ■ B*" '• :#;:'■ .^•i- mIm--te-v^ ¥-^r .-*• m^te:- lllfe:pit te-m"Iteff-Ifea- m'lia ft-; -■■tSv-i. ■;.<■. . feft ’-'EtfS.."?,, iSfteft lit.m fe: Subd. B R-3 Lot ReoftH anrt jetbaclcs. The following mlnimuni requirements shall be observed in an "R-3" District stibject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this Ordinance. 1. Lot Area: Density a. The maximum density for multiple family dwellings will be determined based on the following criteria: (1) Minimum base lot size of 15,000 square feet. (2) Compliance with required building setbacks. (3) Compliance with required parking standards. (4) Compliance with required building height restrictions. (5) Con^liance with the impervious surface standards for the respective district. (6) Provisions for on-site storm water retention and/or compliance with City storm water management plan. (7) Compliance with docking standards of the Lake Minnetonka Conserx'ation District. 2. Lot Width: 100 feet 3. Setbacks: a. Street Side: No less than twenty (20) feet. b. Side Yard: No less than ten (10) feet on any side yard. c. Rear Yard Abutting Another Lot: No less than ten (10) feet. d. Ordinary High Water Mark: No It js than fifty (50) feet for development occurring after the effective date of this Ordincince. e. Top of Bluff: No less than thirty (30) feet. ■■•1 ' 8 '' fe':te - &: ifi-©■I' fr'.v' £■l!-i>^- te?,.p’:-y. ■--v te ' ■ ■.s;- p: ,- ^hmp- m.I'-' ►K: 3.ERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE Exiatlna Conditiona. The purpose Of the lot coverage inventory is to determine by zoning district, the areas of the City which contain lot coverage below and above the maximum allowed by the DNR shoreland standards. The City was broken down into its zoning districts and the net area of each district was calculated. Using aerial photographs superimposed on section maps, lot coverage was determined for each zoning district by calculating the footprint area of all structures, accessory structures, and driveways. This total provided the amount of impervious surface coverage per zoning district. Table 4 provides the total area and impervious surface covered in each zoning district. TABLE 4 SPRING PARK SHORELAND TOTAL AREA AND IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE BY ZONING DISTRICT Zoning District Total Area Impervious Allowed Impervious Percent Covered R-1 2,938,100 477,600 734,525 16 R-2 346,800 49,450 86,700 14 R“3 1,227,000 522,625 306,750 42 P 314,300 65,950 78,575 21 C-1 1,626,766 1,398,636 406,691 86 C-2 387,200 320,000 96,800 82 C-3 85,000 79,000 21,250 93 M 783,666 656,100 195,916 • m As can be seen in Taible 4, the ounount of lot coverage within the R- 3 District exceeds the DNR maximum impervious surface standards, yet because the R*l cuid R-2 districts are developed below this standard, as a whole, residential development within Spring Park is developed below the DNR impervious surface stamdard of 25 percent. There is a surplus of 78,300 square feet in the Residential District which could be covered by impervious surface. Commercial and industrial zoned land has, however, exceeded the allowed lot coverage by 1,733,079 feet. This over coverage is due to the historic development of the City which includes extensive commercial and industrial development within the Shoreland District. \ •n;i •T7«7F»tTOi •roi lOAl rATSI . r, M .-' ■ *i* ‘ i-’ m.'/i Kv i^:.’ ■ iV-'te. m V.- *■.r I V *v ^i'v h: ' ■/' BUILDING HEIGHT The current Zoning Ordinance allows development in the R-1 and R-2 zones to build to a height of 2-1/2 stories or 35 feet. The R-3 zone is allowed to build to a height of three stories or 40 feet. There are currently buildings in the R-3 zone which approach the 40 foot height limit. lap]mnirntlltiliftn■ The city is requesting flexibility in building height to remain at the existing conditions so that all zoning districts may retain the existing building height and so that redeveloiznent can take place in an equitable fashion. Cllry Effarta to Control Shoreland Development. In light of the City's request for flexibility, the City has also adopted policies and plans which help establish consistency with the Shoreland Ordinance. The City's adopted Comprehensive Plan creates policies and goals to improve the inpacts of its existing development on Lake Minnetonka. The City is in the process of updating its Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan so that its storm water measures will be consistent with the DNR shoreland regulations. The draft Shoreland Ordinance proposed is more restrictive than the model in that no water oriented accessory structures are allowed Including boathouses. This will help Spring Park maintain a waterfront development less cluttered with buildings and boathouses. The City has also established policies which have eliminated tandem lot splits which were occurring in deep waterfront lots. L- • ■ '.te!;;.;,, ■ ; -.i. ■- ■ •. V'. "■■■'^WiH m fe-v'IP'-fer fe^, lit:''m-'p-teB-pwyfp. I#} iN m ftep- Bonestroo Rosene Ancternk& Associates Engineers ft Architects Ono G Boneswxx PE Eodert W Rosene. PE * Joseph C Anderttit PE Marvm L Sorvala. PE. PiChanj E Turner PE Giervn R Cook. PE Thoh'Ji E Moyei P£ RoOerr G SchurrchL PE Susjn M EDertm. C PA •Senior Corssuwn a SaniorO PE KeiCh A Gordon PE ItoOefT E Pftffiprte PE Richard W Pos«f PE David O LoslaotJ. PE Rooen C RusseK. A; A Jerry a Bourdon, P£ Mark A HansoTi. *6. Mchad T Raujmonn. PE Ted IC. Pieid. PE Thomas R Anderson. A1A Donald C BungandL PE Thomas E Angui PE Gary f Ryiander. P£ (smaei Mamnea. PE V<naer P Rau PE Agres M Ring. AIC P Thomas W ^ferson. PE VKnaei C Lynch. PE James R Marand. PE Jerry O Peotich PE Kenneth P Anderson PE Mark R RoRs. PE Mart A Sepi PE Gary W Monen. PE Danief i Edgmon. PEEdvrton. PE P^ »o J Caswell. PE Mart O \Ai^ PE M<Jes 8 Jensen. PE L Phnifo Grasiei m PE Karen l Wiemen. P£ P Toca Poster. PE Keth R Yaoo PE Shawn O Gusta^on PE Cec.*0 Ciivfr PE Cna^es A EncKson Leo VI Pa*Aeiiicy Ha.*tan M O^son James f Engeihaidi // July 24,1992 City of Orono Box 66 Orono, Minnesota 55323 % Attn: John Gerhardson Re:1992 Seal Coat Our Ffle No. 13965 Dear John: Enclosed please find three (3) copies of Request for Payment No. 1 for the 1992 Seal Coat project. This work has been satisfactorily completed and we recommend payment. If you have any questions please contact me. -t..—r" •• ^iri■3 ^ ■ * te"' ;!?•'''..Owner CUy of Orono, Box 66, Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dale July 23, 1992 For Pleriod Start to July 23. 1992 Request Noi 1 Cootr Omaim Brothers, loc., PO Box 113, Hanover, MN 55341 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT 1992 Seal Coat FUe No. 13965 SUMMARY f ■1^: 11 Ori^iol Contract Amount f 2 Change Order • Additioa 9,174.40 3 Change Order - Deduction 4 Revised Contract Amount ‘4-f’ ^ 5 Va!*ie Ccmplcled to Date i6 Materiai on Hand 7 Amount Earned 8 Leu Rctaina.<^ 5% r 9 Sub-Totalpr 10 Less Amount Paid Previously :*3I 11 AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO ll- RoOftHiHunded for Approval by: TROO, ROSENE» ANDERJJK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Approved by Contractor: OMAm BROTHERS* INC Approved by Owner: CITY OF ORONO, MN Specified Contract Completion Date: Ji% 31, 1992 Date: H. t i4965.RFP•V >- mi $9,174.40 $9,174.40 $0.00 s 9,174.40 $458.72 $8,715.68 $0.00 $8,715.68 W:, ^•l-'V ■ v;*-T-rv-" * :l •H mi p»- !•' M k-' ■ .i; 'pt/h 0\ «S’ . ■' ’d.y 0rP' •rkpK; . r- ■'v'. 1 BUttmiooiu material for seal coat 2 FA-2 seal coat aggregate (Cl. C) (chip seal) b place Total Work Completed to Date CoalfiKl Uoli Quanllly UiUl QuitnUly Price Ta Dele T« Dale GL 6,400 0.85 6,400 5,440.00 TN 320 11.67 320 -------3,714.40. S9.174.40 13965.UFP RP-1 VV4 K-'^K' v»-: k-t* : ;Aoject Ploject Na • PAYMENT STATUS CUy of Orono 1992 Seal Coat •i.:00.ntfio. t. 13965 Omaan Bros. >^V- Wv I- ‘:V ■CHANOE ORDERS No. Date Amount C’ ^ t fe. Total Change Orders - Add V'.''A’v'.-r. 'm\ ‘■iSk PAYMENT SU?«? \StV V % lr.V t. #. [I; K Nol 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Period Start 7-23-92 Payment $8,715.68 Rctainage $458.72 Completed $9,174.40 ^ir ■ % Total Payment to Date Relaioage, Payment No. Total Value Completed $8,715.68 458.72 $0,174.40 Original Contract Change Orders Revised Contract $9,174.40 0.00 $‘^ 174.40 1396j.Rin*RP-2 I *4- W-'-: ..... 1. .. •k-i- ^:f^}An ..V). .i ?:•■' ■ ■ r'‘ %„■ &v ; i: |.; fe % 1^r %.7-> i’V '' r^-' f'-'" f-''.' tr'\ ■•. |r. . i'- V'.,. I?;- ;U. ;T L • ■'^r. \ “* •k ^'• W i, +!. • i- % =•-r? * -— ‘•■.■' m- - io /■^ TO Mayor and City Council ?> ^ 7o 'H? FROM: Ron Moorse, City Administrator DATE: August 6, 1992 *4^ SUBJECT: Richard Hassel Application for Beaver Trapping Permit The Council at its July 27th meeting tabled Richard Hassel’s application for a beaver trapping permit. The Council wanted additional information regarding the need for the permit, the number of beaver to be trapped, and the potential for using live traps. Mr. Hassel is planning to attend the Council meeting to respond to the Council's questions. • *AFPLICATIOIi LIMITED LEGHOLD TRAP PE’-lT^iIT C?/^ DATE Name 2!t 19^V ,Application Number: Address:tj.no vUtu-T Location of Trapline: Number of Traps: [\ix. Maintenance procedure for t.raplIne! Period of time needed for permit:_ _ _Ui^ Purpose ( Include written statement of hardship) Od f AiDUAK^ \kJZK^ d/^iayi—T5Ilk Va .[xa JL ^HJCTU^ y UAj|Vdlc> I a^ree to furnish a certified property o^vners list of property ^owners x agiee^cu __ _Pr^r>T^o-rty owners will be noT.iiiea of icable Federal, State, and ^ ____ rs ilZZ ox prcpei uy ^uwurri o within'^500 feet of trapping area. Prope^y owners will be no^^iiied of application. I agree to aoide by alL^pp^i' Local Laws including ordinance 2?^> Signature of Applicant $20.00 Fee paid^ Date: JUiLi/»2>Y /19^Z. iM'-TEtrUED; Yes L i it 0 riblivT^Sa : tyjJirector AT),- ./n I r . I *. / .y.-s I T.T ^ ) i*.y MoniTii ^ ■ ■''r foo t -f V' ir t rev: r.-’ can r* V’ ^ ’ f' rCertified list ■'f :-r'^p*^r ‘.y ■ ••. be obtained from tn^ in : > i;.:.y^: i ; yi; • v ' •• ' " * A~601 Co'inty Gcv'-rnn<^i^t ; -^r.*-v.r. ...• • -.: • .. ex ¥ t >' i. . U-. i t ft..-' k'' k V ’ & ■|: i 9 i»M'wr • - ^•4 ••'«<V «4 ,•■•-•». .• *1 nn 3 tP fO 1/1 r» O 3 J Cm *3 3s 3 r» ut 3 t/% r> S' r>o 3 U*i fT> < (V O 3 n -1 roa. CTro oa: Z (H t k‘-w |i:.> S -. . W‘k^-|w- ■?i k- ■••■ k: i:.' ■' , 114 #iv- •'t rfe. &%■iaf i «M’r p4P^' >)L-r-. K? m. If i .T- cOj, TO: FROM: DRTB: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator August 6f 1992 C/s. "Q / %. % SOBJBCT: Grant Application for Milfoil Cor rol on Long Lake I have attached information from David Sawyer, Long Lake CounciImember, concerning an application for grant funds to control milfoil in Long Lake. CounciImerober Sawyer is proposing a joint grant application to enable milfoil control efforts to take place this fall. mi-’: '■ mfe:'- «?•* &■■ V- n:^:v. ^r- i': ■:»: its. I’; v; [i- P' #' t I? fe'- J ■ K-- pc fe,. ■ fl-;- pi : fe-' b-fcn.' V:-r < ■pr mfe".mm f-K-’ ^r % r: Lit ■* i • .: lr> Jh*t^JhJse^WHERE THE WEST BEGINS August 5, 1992 Mr. Ron Moorse, city Admiriistrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55323 Dear Ron: Per our conversation today, attached is the information regarding the grant application to fight milfoil on Long Lake. Please add this matter to the August 10th. council meeting agenda, and provide the attached to the Orono council for discussion at that meeting. f. If you have any questions or comments, please give me a call at 520-9746. Best regards. David Sawyer CounciImembe r City of Long Lake •i cc; LL council wp51\rmoorse CITY HALL: !%4 PAKK .V.LSUE • LONG LAKE, MiSSLSOTA 55 33b • PHONE: ;6i:M:j 09bl . 'Y-v; .%• ?| .* • • J.V' 'X ■ W''-' * iv -ry '■?■IS®.. fV ' • i¥: : ■hr:^‘' Hr.'' hUi, %H'- -r- WHERE THE WEST BEGINS August 5, 1992 Orono City Council: As you may know, Eurasian Water Milfoil has now been identified in Long Lake. The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners has recently provided the Hennepin Conservation District (HCD) with funds to provide to local governments for Milfoil co. rol activities. We are now in the process of gathiring the required information to satisfy the grant application guidelines so that funding can be pursued for evaluation and treatment activities on Long Lake. I have been told by the HCD that Long Lake would be a priority as there is an opportunity for elimination of milfoil from the lake if action is taken soon enough. L/Take^^fif^^bl rr/h ^a^cUfrat^ir ^fJor^^ in-S^h:if “Sl\h2 cities of Orono and Long Lake. I would like to be able to submit a grant application to HCD from both cities jointly. Therefore, I will be attending your council . ^ ^ 0S. ^nv mioSLtllOflS VOli Cnsy tl21V6meetinrAulust 10th.‘, in order x!o answer any questions you may have and to^hopefully receive a supportive resolution from your council. Attached are memos from the HCD, and a blank copy of the grant application and guidelines for your review. Hopefully we can act swiftly to help prevent a total infestation of the Lake. Sincerely, David R. Sawyer CounciImember City of Long Lake wp51\mi1foil CITY hall: l%4 PARK AVENUE . LONG LAKE, MINNESOTA 35356 . PHONE: 16121473.6961 '» j^p;- Hennepin Conservation District ife':' i ,1f^V -' •. Mm-.ii;3' m- rfSr •4'Vm;^- '■-;>r■v;-^*' f-'r ■ ■■ mmM¥ i 1^' W- ^^. i ■• ‘■;J I'’;;-:* / I P- r W'p: m fc' MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: Interested Persons Hennqrin Conservation District July 24.1992 SUBJECT: Hennepin County Eurasian Water Milfoil Control Program The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners has recently provided the Hennepin Conservation Dtstnct (HCD) with funds to combat infestations of Eurasian Water Milfoil. These Itinds will be used to provide financial assistance to local governments and community groups in Hennepin County for milfoil control activities. The purpose of this letter is to inform you about an upcoming meeting to discuss the Hen^in Cwty Milfoil Control program and how you can apply for grant funds. The meeting will include a Min presentation about die program followed by a question and answer period. The meeting will be held 3.‘00 pjn. Wednesday July 29 at the HCD office. The office address is 12450 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 203. Minnetonka. The at plication fn funds must be for a waterbody that has an Eurasian Water Milfoil . Details on how to apply, eligible control activities and expenses and grant review criteria will be provided. A program outline is enclosed. HCD hopes to fund some activities that mi:will occur yet this fall. We anticipated that grants will be awarded beginning in August. If you have any questions please contact Joel Settles at 544>8S72. 205 Ridge Plaza Bldg. 12450 Wayzata Boulevard Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343 Telephone |61 2) 544-8572 Pnntfd on racvdad Dsoer I I 1 Ji : > A j p-i • -5i- ' 1 i•>i A ^'i*' 'i i ^!«T'?^B^i:l£ fe-"' Hufttpln ConMfvation District i MEMORANDUM -1 FROM: DATE; Interested Persons Hennepin Conservation District Angost 3,1992 Ills SUBJECT: Hennepin County Eurasiai: Water Milfoil Control ProgramA •*» “ I'l "V- HIP ^ Pnfbiwt is a final description of the Hennepin County Milfoil Program and an applic^on ibniL Please note that the application period ends August 14th. If g>“ *“y 9“csj»o"* legaiding the program or application proc^, feel free to contact Carolyn Dindoif of Joel Settles at 5^8572. -i.'* 't ttr-... . •• .- W- . ■"■i J W0^- pr:.,.,. m . ■. ■ 'A Iff: Wfe*' i; ... . apph: J.' ' • ' ■-: :K. V. V 2105 f^e Plaza Bidg. 12450 Wayzata Boulevard Minnetonka, Minnesota 553<? 3 Telephone (612) 544-8572 Pnmm»ntye>taew - iifiiTu i^iVifr >^:-'■\m:-.f' h:^. . t fMh^f:: tl:-fe-: P^ P'?^; |i>', ■.‘. ';»-CA. ■■ .-r- V' ;'V ^SS'’; Mf<^-ifcf ■ ''.'V- ■ .-:“-x-/‘- K- fef'' IsEf? . A.V '^m'iJ: iS'fi' :'<Ht m~r #:*'■ Hennepin County Eurasian Water Milfoil Control Program Statement of Puipose The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners has provided the Hennepin Conservation District with funds to combat infestations of Eurasian Water Milfoil. These funds will be used to provide financial assistance to local governments and community groups in Hennepin County for milfoil control activities. The first applicadon period for these funds is August 3 through August 14, 1992. Additional application periods may be established depending upon the number of applications received and the availability of funds. How to Apply Applicants must submit a grant implication and supporting materials to the Hennepin Conservation District by August 14, 1992. Supporting materials include: a cover letter describing the existing conditions and the need for assistance; quotations for services, materials and other related cost estimates; anticipated stan and completion dates for milfoil control activities; copies of DNR permits for the proposed activities^; names, addresses and telephone numbers of persons authorized to sign grant agreements and submit requests for reimbursements; and other materials related to project scope and anticipated outcomes the applicant feels will facilitate the review of the application. If advance payment of grant funds is requested. documentation describing why an advance is necessary must be submitted. m.Eligible Milfoil Control Activities Eligible milfoil control activities include: • Chemical treatments for milfoil control; • Harvesting of milfoil; and • Innovative or experimental methods of milfoil control as scientifically reviewed and accepted by the interagency Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force. Application for grant funds may be made for eligible milfoil control activities scheduled from September 1, 1992 through August 31, 1993. Requests for*reimbursement for activities prior to September 1,1992 will not be accepted. ^Ct^ies of DNR permit applications may be submitted in lieu of the actual permit to facility tite grant application process. No grant funds will be provided to a project that has not received the necessary DNR permits. r. vi•I i 1 i I J , -=•: J . V-.v*' I ■i IV. Eligible ExpensesEligible expenses include expenditures for• Personnel for equipment operadon and delineadon of infested areas; • Equipment; and • Commercial Vendors-Professional Services. Administradve costs are not an eligible expense. V. Grant Review Criteria • Priori^ will be given to appUcadons that are deemed to have a high probability of successfully controlling Eurasian Water Milfoil. • Priority will be given to grant applications that demonstrate a coordinated, cooperative effort between community organizations, the private sector and state and lociti governments. • Priority will be given to grant applications that have state and/or local matching fiinds. • Priority win be given to applications concerning water bodies that have exceptional value for pubtic recreation and other related public uses. VL Approval of Applications and Awarding of Grants The Hennepin Conservation District Board of Supervisors will approve applications and award grants to local governments and community organizations. Vn. Grant Administration Approved applicants will receive for signature a cost-share agreement specifying the ts and conditions of the grantMen ••r vn. Advance and Reimbursement Request Procedures Approved applicants shall submit a letter with supporting documentation to the Hennepin Conservation District requesting reimbunement for eligible project costs. Supporting documentation includes copies of bills, invoices, canceled checks, payroll registers and other documents related to eligible project costs. An advance payment may be requested. 'v'v M ' >., • '' ■■:■-: V ; rp^ ^ iXk Yf.' k ■r-w! .:■ ilsf-i .V^ -''V-; ^ pr J .•■. . ■•■♦*- ;■>■£ * •‘■j p.- .% j^M r' ' /5v • ,1#; tefc-. 86-#,: t'>,f-v::’-‘-«‘ •J^’'-'K- <■ v= . ‘O '*T : k Kl* •'* ■:.<■ \f'U /; i. iv.:i»A'i'; - ^ V"- "•'■^r' ''%*fsA/ ftr- S#'- ' ?;##!-• j. JV-' -' y.. < Descr^don of Activity Persons/Vendor Perfonning Work • Cooperating Agencies and Contributing Sponsors Name Type of Contribution Amount Signature of Applicant Date 4 J?', .-‘ V-v^ •■,|Jg»;JfrV ’ :)Y *y5 i J-^,r* ;,',_./.-.v •T*'< ' .' l^.-!^. iV p:' ^1- '■ ^ APPROVING A JOINT BORASIAN WATER MILFOIL GRANT APPLICAIION WITH THE CITY OP LONG LAKE WHEREAS, Eurasian Water Milfoil has now been identified in Long Lake, and isi-.#Sv: WHEREAS, it is important that control efforts be initiated as soon as possible to stop the Milfoil from spreading and to possibly eradicate it, and WHEREAS, the Hennepin Conservation District has a grant program for Eurasian Water Milfoil control efforts, and WHEREAS, because Long Lake is located within the Cities of Orono and Long Lake both cities have a strong interest in preserving the quality of the lake. Ik"m. HOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Orono City Council does hereby approve the joint submission of a grant application to the Hennepin Conservation District to control LJ ^ Water Milfoil on Long Lake. ;^^opted by the City Council of the City of Orono at • their regular meeting on the 10th d / of August, 1992. PS'-W^‘ I?! > ' •' W '• ATTEST:Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor S%v^lborothy rt. Hallin, City Clerk wste; ml.. 1%' ♦V . '‘1- *' Tii ,♦: 71^ 1 j fi ■'•I'-.ig‘,sfi'-'-'f -PS'%,., ':r 'ili-... Dates m^: :»I Subjects Ron Moorse, City Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director August 6, 1992 Yardwaste Program Changes /‘Z Du0 to unexpected costs for the yardwaste program this spring it is necessary to place a fee on leaves and brush. K:The following is a proposed fee schedule: psB |j$ te?--V ■ r- v;-‘‘O-V.' Leaves and grass .50 per bag , j ^Bulk loads will be measured and charged $3.00 cubic yard Brush Two wheel trailer 3 c.y. $9.00 Pick up 3 c.y. $9.00 Heaped loads will be measured and charged $3«00 per cubic yard It is also recommended that the schedule be adjusted as per the attached sheet. KS#;- iV-.Vilt V • -V m b#?'4V. •».* Ayfe't Wm ■ A: *■' - Wsii tei. .rMr.'fv' V -- fW- mmmB •a; 'V 1 '’4 1 1 • i- W (»?•v:.. ,* r' * •■ f H?' ‘ ^ ■ S. 1^' tr #'K' W' mr !■■■-> 7> ;r I YAR]• ].7,CITY OF ORONO STB PROGRAM 1992 The City of Orono wi 11 be providing a drop site for leaves^ grass and brush for 1992. The drop off site is 1335 Brown Road South, the long gold equipment shed in Crystal Bay next to the administration office, on the following Saturdays from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.: The schedule is as follows: Saturday April 25, 1992 8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. Because of severe space limitations or brush can be accepted on May 2nd or City Clean-up. HO grass» saves 9th during our Saturday Saturday Saturday Saturday Saturday Saturday Saturday Hay Hay May June June June June 16, 1992 23, 1992 30, 1992 6, 1992 13, 1992 20, 1992 27, 1992 8:00 8:00 8:00 8:00 8:00 8:00 8:00 a.m. d • in • A • in • 3 ■ m • a.m. a.m* a • m • 4:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. July and August: Site closed no collection u -vl"- ■iP-Bagged leaves will have to be emptied into a large container at the dropsite.•^Me will not accept bags of any kind. ?*• 9..^ '4im-r -7i mmimm-Im.-' liffe "W'"" ' Tiiki ■5 -vi 1 ■n Leaves and brush only will be accepted days. on the following ■j ' 4 . i 1SaturdaySeptember5,1992 8:00 a.m.-4:00 p«m« Saturday September 12,1992 8:00 a.m.—4:00 p.Rle Saturday September 19,1992 8:00 a.m.—4:00 p • ni«ti i. Saturday September 26,1992 8:00 a.m.••4:00 Pein«4 •t Leaves only will be( accented on the following days. Saturday October 3,1992 8:00 a.m.-4:00 p. m. Saturday October 10,1992 8:00 a.m.—4:00 p. m.'1 Saturday ~October 24,1992 8:00 a.m.—4:00 p.m.i Saturday October 31,1992 8:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. Saturday November 7,1992 8:00 a.m.-4:00 p.ir.-•^3 imSaturdayNovember14,1992 8:00 a.m.••4:00 p.n. ..gA i .V.”, ■|%:‘%* ''WH ' ■■■:!’'.Vi-k'-' - ^ ■ ir*..ISSfe,fe,; ii rV r,. "^v- ' V ■ il- ■me: :C.' •■'•• 1i ilLf::-i-'- , ! '• ' ■’*'. pss^Ii?, fe,'.^ 4v- ^ 'ipff s,vi'■ ,"• tS^'Ssi- ' ' ■4->-j>- .V : ■■‘■•m iO''-^ V '■ ,Mm - ■ .j^'. ' ' V^'. p'^9- • 1 V 4‘ ■; •' Extract of Minutes of Meeting of the City Council of the City of Orono " Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuemt to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, wa^J|^ duly held at the City Hall in the City, on Monday, August 10, 1992 at 7:00 o'cloclc P.M. The following members were present: auid the following were ed^sent: # * ** * * * ♦ '* The Mayor announced that the meeting was convened for the purpose of considering proposals for the purchase of $2,000,000 General Obligation Sewer Improvement Bonds, Series 1992. *** **« *** Vhe City Memager then presented the bids received prior to 11:30 o'clock A.M. on August 10, 1992 pursuauit to the Official Notice of Bond Sale for the General Obligation Sewer Improvement Bonds, Series 1992. These were excunined and found to be as follows: Name of Bidder Interest Rates Purchase Price IftS'-,,’ m mmrnmmi ‘nJ a-j■‘j >1 •I £I 1 •'1 .m. . ii- -1%.^ V • Eli.'- m ;i' .V ; • ^ ' LfeR."- m mtr mm- f". -.- mi :aSK,.. r'/i^.y: iv' i^; ■ '■•r'-f 'ise;.-. K^e-'fe-/;: ■J.'k'-r^.'- : >;■>*;•;;. . ■^!^r- ;■ W'y-'''' .1 Member introduced the following I written resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AWARDING SALE OF $2,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION SEWER IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1992, FIXING THE FORM AND SPECIFICAriONS THEREOF, PROVIDING FOR THEIR EXECUTION AND DELIVERY, AND PROVIDING FOR THEIR PAYMENT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The proposal of _ to purchase -he $2,000,000 General Obligation Sewer Improvement Bonds, Series 1992 of the City is hereby found and determined to be the best proposal received pursuant to the approved Official Notice of Bond Sale, which is hereby approved and ratified, and shall be and is hereby accepted, said offer being to purchase Bonds bearing interest according to year of maturity as follows: Maturity Date Interest Rate ^ Maturity Date Interest Rate 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 %2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 % at a price of $.plus accrued interest. 2. To provide funds for the 1992 Stubbs Bay Sewer Improvement Project, the City shall forthwith issue its negotiable General Obligation Sewer Improvement Bonds, Series 1992 in the aggregate principal amount of $2,000,000, to be dated August 1, 1992, to bear interest at the rates above set forth, conqputed on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months, payable February 1, 1993 and semiannually thereafter on February 1 euid August 1 in each year, amd to mature serially on February 1 in the years and amounts as follows: -2- taints ’r' %'^-k rfs;Jf= •; «• '*■ p Ukk Year Amount 1994 $ 35,000 1995 90,000 1996 95,000 1997 105,000 1998 110,000 1999 115,000 2000 125,000 2001 130,000 Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Amount $140,000 145.000 155.000 165.000 175.000 180.000 185,000 all Bonds maturing on or after February x, xuwx, i^cx^^ « reden^tlon and prior payment in whole or in part in invi of maturity and by lot within a maturity at the option City on February l, 2000, euid any interest payment date thereafter at par and accrued interest. In the event of redemption by lot of Bonds of like maturity, the Bond Registrar shall assign to each Bond of such maturity then outstanding a distinctive number for each $5,000 of the principal amount of such Bonds and shall select by lot in the manner it determines the order of numbers, at $5,000 for each number, for all outstanding Bonds of like maturity. The order of selection of ka aha 11 ho ^ha Bonds to which were assiomed 1, 2001 in being subject to part in inverse order , — • — of the Shall assig distinctive - - aiinh Bonds and shall Select $5,000 for------------------ qm;j-r^g Buuua wx xx«v^ siaturity. The order of _—_ ---------- Bonds to be redeemed shall be the Bonds to which were assigi numbers so selected, but only so much of the principal amoui each Bond of a denomina**ion of more than $5,000 shall be re< as shall equal $5,000 fi each number assigned to it and so selected. Notice of auay redemption shall be given by mail in th manner required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.54. The Bond: shall be numbered from R-1 upwards in order of issuance or in such other order as the Registrar may determine and shall be in the denomindfion of $5,000 each or any integral multiple thereof not exceeUxna the amount maturing in any year. ■a Tha Bonds, the Reaistrar's Authentication le City Clerk's3. Certificate Certificate hVia I'ollowii Certificate on the the following form: The Bonds, the Registrar's Authentication the form of assignment and the City Clerk's the reverse side thereof snail be in substantially 'orra? UNITED STATES OP AMER! STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO NO. R. Interest Rate GENTSRAL OBLIGATION SEWER IMPROVEMENT BOND, SERIES 1992 Registered Owner: Principal Amount: Issue CUSIP -3- 1•i ;> ■ :i#f.m^' l-i'um^xi'i' fe’-- fe ;^- • *P%iffif ''..r. The City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, for value received, hereby promises to pay to the Registered Owner specified above or registered assigns, the Principal Amount specified above on the maturity date specified above, upon the presentation and surrender hereof, and to pay to the Registered 0%mer hereof interest on such Principal Amount at the Interest Rate specified aUbove from August 1, 1992, or the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid or duly provided for as specified below, on February l and Au^st 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 1993, until said principal amount is paid. Principal is payable in lawful money of the United States of America at the office of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ as Bond Registrar or of its successor as Bond Registrar designated by the City upon 60 days' notice to the Registered Owners at their registered addresses. Interest shall be paid on each February 1 and August l interest payment date by check or draft mailed to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the 15th day of the month preceding each interest payment date (whether or not e business day) at said person's address set forth on the registration books maiutained by the Bond Registrar. Any such interest not punctually paid or provided for will cease to be payable to the owner of record as of such regular record dates and such defaulted interest may be paid to the person in whose name this Bond shall be registered at the close of business on a special record date for the payment of such defaulted interest established by the Bond Registrar. For the prompt and full payment of such principal and interest as the same become due the full faith, credit and taxing powers of the City have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. [Additional provisions of this Bond are contained on the reverse side hereof and such provisions shall for all purposes have the saune effect as if set forth here.] The Bonds of this series maturing on or after February 1 2001, are subject to redemption at the option of the City, in whole or in part in inverse order of maturity and by lot within a maturity, on February 1, 2000 and any interest payment date thereafter at par and accrued interest. Thirty days' notice of prior redemption will be given by mail to the banJc where the Bonds are payable and to the registered owners in the manner provided by Chapter 475, Minnesota Statutes. Any defect in mailing notice of redemption shall not affect the validity of the proceedings for redemption. Any Bond called for redemption, and for the payment of which moneys are set aside by the City on the redemption date, shall not bear interest after the redemption date, regardless of any delay in its presentation. This Bond is one of an issue of Bonds in the aggregate principal amount of $2,000,000, all of like date and tenor except -4- •'tf 0M- .i 4' •; P' ■,i My?r,'-' ♦ ife' I • V* J 73: • - u; 'K rVr ''2V r- p. as to maturity, interest rate and redemption privilege, issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the Constitution and Laws of the State of Minnesota, including Chapter 429, Minnesota Statutes, for the purpose of providing funds for construction of a certain local improvement known as the 1992 Sti^bs Bay Sewer Iijmrovement Project; and this Bond is payable primarily from ^S30aainents levied ^ and to be levied from its Improvement obligation of the City and to provide moneys for the prompt and full payment of said principal and interest as the same become due the full faith and credit of the City is h reby irrevocably pledged, and the City will levy ad valorem taxes on all taxable property in the City, if required for such purpose, without limitation as to rate or amount. This Bond is transferable, as provided by the Resolution of the City Council authorizing the issuance of the Bonds of this series adopted August 10, 1992 (the "Resolution”) only upon books of the City kept at the office of the Bond Registrar by the Registered Owner hereof in person or by the Registered Owner's duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this Bond for transfer at the office of the Bond Registrar, duly endorsed by, or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer in form satisfactory to the Bond Registrar duly executed by, the Registered Owner hereof or the Registered Owner's duly authorized attorney, and, upon payment of any taoc, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer, one or more fully registered Bonds of the series of the same principal amount, maturity and interest rate will be issued to the designated transferee or transferees. The Registered Owner of this Bond may be treated as the absolute owner hereof for all purposes. The Bonds of this series are issuaible only as fully registered bonds without coupons in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof not exceeding the principal amount maturing in auiy one year. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations therein set forth, the Bonds of this series are exchangeable for a like aggregate principal amount of Bonds of this series of a different authorized denomination, as requested by the Registered Owner or the owner's duly authorized attorney upon surrender thereof to the Bond Registrar. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond have been done, have happened have been performed in regular and due form, time and manner as required by law and that this Bond, together with all other indebtedness of the City outstanding on the date -5- T -—00kt:::' ' of its issuance, does not exceed any constitutional or statutorylimitation of indebtedness.This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatopr for any purpose until the Authentication Certificate hereon shall have been signed by the Bond Registrar.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Orono, Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed in its behalf by the facsimile signature of the Mayor and by the facsimile signature of the City Cleric, all as of the Date of Original Issue specified above. "lip#'mm.- Dated: fPargimilQ Signature) Mayor -1 • ■ •i m m la s P«iV W' ' ■' ■ iR ifti Si? '• ••••<• b '■ ^ -K ' I, 'i» »;■ '•¥■;?>w%!rM. '^i^-'Bond Registrar's Authentication CertificateThis is'one of the Bonds described in the within mentioned Resolution. #' Pr- ^ p? «■ ■ :-r-' •:#J' P^v: Bond Registrar By Authorized Signature ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (Please Print or Typewrite Name and Address of Transferee) the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevoccUDly constitutes and appoints _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -vsi . • If c. •1^ C -Mir.,. ¥'ilS #5:5# fev , i'; mM0-' Pi? :? mm. Please Insert Social Security Number or Other Identifying Number of Assignee Notice: The signature to this assignment must correspond with the ncune as it appears on the face of this Bond in every particular, without alteration or any change whatever. Signature Guaranteed: Signatures must be guaranteed by a national bank or trust company or by a brokerage firm having membership in one of the major stock exchanges. -7- Si|?: \ i •<ui.. ti* :> j*•5s: f ■ • '-■ ' fe ’> - pym i^hy-Wys • 0- V« ^R5v' p-' - •■ %- ’k't -•;: -- :iC:y^" . 3f . '^f- •=i'.-N>:rv^%'fe*v.''msm (Certificate as to Legal Opinion) Minnesota foregoing of Faegre delivered my office I, the Oindersigned, City Cleric of the City of Orono, hereby certify that except for the date line, the is a full, true and compared copy of the legal opinion & Benson, of Minneapolis, Minnesota which was to me upon delivery of the bonds and is now on file in ^Facsimile Signature) City Cleric 4. The Bonds shall be payable upon presents cion at the main office of_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, in as Registrar and Paying Agent, or at the offices of such other successor agents as the City may hereafter designate upon 60 days' mailed notice to the registered owners at their registered addresses. Interest shall be paid by check or draft of the Registrar mailed to the registered owners at their addresses shown on the registration books on each interest payment date unless other arrangements satisfactory to the Bond Registrar the City and the registered owners of Bonds are made. The City shall deposit funds with the Bond Registrar at the time and in the manner necessary to provide for the full and prompt payment of such principal and interest. 5. The Bonds shall be prepared in typewritten or printed form under the direction of the City Clerk and when so prepared shall be executed on behalf of the City by the facsimile signature of the Mayor and by the facsimile signature of the City Clerk. The Bonds shall not be valid for any purpose until authenticated by the Bond Registrar. The Bond Registrar is authorized and directed to register the Bonds initially issued hereunder in such names as the purchaser may direct. The Bonds initially issued hereunder shall be registered as of August 1, 1992, and all Bonds issued in exchcuige therefor shall be registered as of such date, or, if issued after the first payment date, as of the most recent interest payment date on which interest was paid or duly provided for. The legal opinion of Faegre & Benson of Minneapolis, Minnesota, respecting the validity and enforceability of the Bonds shall be reproduced on the reverse side of each Bond at the request of the purchaser and shall be certified by the facsimile signature of the City Clerk. When the Bonds shall have been so prepared and executed, they shall be delivered by the City Clerk or Finance Director in exchange for the purchase price and upon receipt of the signed legal opinion of Faegre & Benson, as Bond Counsel, and the purchaser ?;u not be required to see to the proper application of the prouisecij. 6. As long as any of the Bonds issued hereunder shall remain outstanding, the City shall maintain and keep at the -8- IP-' r s t'iM i V (>{i::: :/ 5 rA-.'it .;♦ ■ ’w/ :Vv te'’ office of the Bond Registrar an office or agency for the payment of the principal of and interest on such Bonds, as in this Resolution provided, and for the registration and transfer of such Bonds, and shall also keep at said office of the Bond Registrar books for such registration and transfer. Upon surrender for treuisfer of any Bond at the office of the Bond Registrar with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or the owner's duly authorized attorney, and upon payment of any tax, fee or other governmental charge rec[uired to be paid with respect to such transfer, the City shall execute and the Bond Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated trauosferee or transferees, one or more fully registered Bonds of the same series, of any authorized denominations and of a like aggregate principal amount, interest rate and maturity. The Bonds, upon surrender thereof at the office of the Bond Registrar, may, at the option of the registered owner thereof, be exchanged for aui equal aggregate principal amount of Bonds of the same maturity and interest rate of any authorized denominations. In all cases in which the privilege of exchanging Bonds or transferring fully registered Bonds is exercised, the City shall execute and the Bond Registrar shall deliver Bonds in accordance with the provisions of this Resolution. For eve^ such exchange or transfer of Bonds, whether temporary or definitive, the City or the Bond Registrar may make a charge sufficient to reimburse it for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such exchange or transfer, which sum or sums shall be paid by the person requesting such exchange or transfer as a condition precedent to the exercise of the privilege of making such exchamge or transfer. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Resolution, the cost of preparing each new Bond upon each exchange or transfer, emd any other expenses of the City or the Bond Registrar incurred in connection therewith (except any appliccd^le tax, fee or other governmental charge) shal.l be paid by the City. The City and the Bond Registrar shall not be obligated to make any such exchange or transfer of Bonds during the fifteen (15) days next preceding the date of the first publication or the mailing (if there is no publication) of notice of redein)tion in the case of a proposed reden^tion of Bonds or to make any transfer or exchange of any Bonds during the fifteen (15) days next preceding any February 1 or August 1 interest payment date. 7. Interest on any Bond which is payable, and is punctually paid or duly provided for, c^. any interest payment date shall be paid to the person in whcje name that Bond (or one or more Bonds for which such Bond was exchanged) is registered at the close of business on the 15th day of the month preceding such interest payment date. Any interest on any Bond which is payable, but is not punctually paid or duly provided for, on any interest payment date shall forthwith cease to be payable to the registered holder on the relevant regular record date solely by -9- .^. ., •. _ 1 y ■ ^.‘ ‘ . . .#•»'PIf ■5:%^ ■ fff .- ■'of ■•-V i#' ^«'.- iKv'.w: Si;. Si- ■■.o: ^KSfc virtue of such holder having been such holder; and such defaulted Interest may be paid by the City in any lawful manner, if, after notice given by the City to the Bond Registrar of the proposed payment pursuant to this paragraph, such payment shall be deemed practicad}le by the Bond Registrar. Subject to the foregoing provisions of this paragraph, each Bond delivered under this Resolution upon tramsfer of or in exchange for or in lieu of any other Bond shall carry all the rights to interest accrued and unpaid, and to'accrue, which were carried by such other Bond and each such Bond shall bear interest from such date that neither gain nor loss in' interest shall result from such transfer, exchange or substitution. 8. As to any Bond, the City cind the Bond Registrar and their respective successors, each in its discretion, may deem and treat the person in whose name the same for the time being shall be registered as the absolute owner thereof for all purposes and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar nor their respective successors shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. Payment of or on account of the principal of any such Bond shall be made only to or upon the order of the registered oimer thereof, but such registration may be changed as above pj^ovided. All such payments shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon such Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. 9. There is created a special fund, to be known as the Improvement Bonds of 1992 Fund, for the purpose of paying principal and interest on the Bonds, and in the event the principal of and interest upon the said Bonds shall become due and payable and there are insufficient moneys in said fund to pay such principal and interest, the City Treasurer is authorized and directed to pay said principal and interest from the general fund anrt thereafter to reimburse said general fund from collections of taxes levied pursuant hereto and special assessments for 1992 Stubbs Bay Sewer Improvement Project (the "Improvement"). The proceeds of the Bonds herein authorized shall be deposited in a separate construction fund to be used solely for the payment of expenses of such Improvement. Any remaining proceeds may be used for the any lawful purpose. All collections of special assessments for the Improvement are hereby irrevocably appropriated and pledged to the payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds herein authorized, and the moneys and investments in the Improvement Bonds of 1992 Fund shall be used fcr no other purpose than to pay principal of and interest on the said Bonds until such principal and interest shall have been paid in full; provided, however, that nothing herein contained shall prevent the issuance and sale of additional bonds payable from the proceeds of such assessments to provide additional funds to pay the balance of the cost of said improvement. The City is hereby authorized to levy assessments for said Improvement for which special assessments have not heretofore been levied. The -10- U.rbI'- Finance Director may create separate accounts within the Improvement Bonds of 1992 Fund for any capitalized interest and for assessment prepayments. 10. It is hereby found and determined that the estimated collection of special assessments pledged for the payment of said Bonds will produce at least five percent in excess of the amount needed to meet, when due, the principal and interest payments on the Bonds so that no general taxes are initially required to be levied for such purpose, but the Bonds are general obligations of the City to which the full faith, credit and unlimited taocing powers of the City have been and are hereby pledged; and the City Council shall levy general ad valorem taxes on all taxable property in the City, if necessary, to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds when due. It is further found and determined that the special benefits to be assessed against assessable property for the Improvement will, in any case, be more than 20% of the cost of the Improvement to the City. 11. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the purchaser and to the attorneys approving the Bonds, certified copies of all proceedings and records relating to the issuance of said General Obligation Sewer Improvement Bonds, Series 1992 and to the right, power and authority of the City and its officers to issue the same, and said certified copies and certificates shall be deemed the representations of the City as to all matters stated therein. 12. The Official Statement relating to the Bonds, on file with the Clerk and presented to this meeting, is hereby approved and its designation as a "near final" Official Statement for purposes of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the furnishing thereof to prospective purchasers of the Bonds are hereby ratified and confirmed, insofar as the same relates to the Bonds and the sale thereof. 13. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Secretary of the Treasury a statement meeting the information reporting requirements of Section 149(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1936, as cunended (the "Code"), by the 15th day of the second calendar month after the close of the calendar quarter in which the Bonds are issued. 14. The City shall not take or permit any action that would cause the Bonds to be "private activity bonds" within the meaning of Section 141 of the Code. The City shall comply with the rebate requireinents imposed under Section 148(f) of the Code and regulations thereunder, including (if applicable) the requirement to make periodic calculations of the aunount s\^ject to rebate thereunder and the requirement to make all required -11- a sg^^“^ t ' iSM?' ■■<v,r - ..'."V *, ;.' PI.' ;v ■\* < %rr ■ - g»: ■'ts^.- u -..v?" w. ■ ■r?,-. V .. ;fp.m '0K' -Vr. Wmimm :^>- \> rebates to the United States. It is hereby determined that the City expects that the Bonds will be exempt from arbitrage rebate by reason of Section 148(f)(4) (D) of the Code. In addition, the City shall make no investment of funds that would cause the Bonds to be "arbitrage bonds" within the meaning of Section 148 of the Code and regulations thereunder. All terms used in this paragraph 14 shall have the meanings provided in the Code and regulations thereunder. 15. The Bonds are hereby designated "qualified tax exempt obligations" for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. 16. The City Clerk shall furnish a certified copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Hennepin County, and obtain the Courty Auditor's certificate as required by law. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member and upon vote being taken thereon the following voted in thereof: favor and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. -12- A'- *-■:W'\ -H **--"■iS< pv:r.. f v ;» e- ":’i- te'‘"W '■''•►■'K f?'-r"- fefe-. -«r| x . £ . ■ > - I®,.,.. i:; 'T--.: ,v>^ teps%';-'>fc''-:st:»; mt.--£».*•> >rj •, STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS. ) CITY OF ORONO ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Cleric of the City of Orono, Minnesota, hereby certify that I have carefully compa'*"ed the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City held August 10, 1992 with the original thereof on file and of record in my office and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the seune relates to the issuance and sale of $2,000,000 General Obligation Sewer Improvement Bonds, Series 1992 of said City. WITNESS My hand officially and the seal of the City this _ _ _ _ day of August, 1992 City Clerk City of Orono, Minnesota (Seal) MFF0130A.WP5 -13- ammm-- * ->i-: 111' •V ^< . £l''ji .V . ... ^ A . . M . S. .Mi Ivkr :i*/- !BID TABUIATIQN •» ' k •• S' f-i- $2,000,000 Q^ntnil Obligation Sewer Improvement Bonds, Series 1992 City r - Orono. Minnesota SALE r»*onu V August 10,1992 AWARD: PA^^K NVESTMENT CORPORATION f >•, 1> RATING:Iv’s "Aa1 BBI: 6.06% r. NAME OF BIDDER COUPON RATE YEAR NET INTEREST COST & RATE PRICE PARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION Minneapolis, Minnesota FIRST WISCONSIN NATIONAL BANK OF MILWAUKEE Milwaukee, Wisconsin f i« fii''-'S^-V' '}■ ■■ t % CRONIN & COMPANY, INC. Minneapolis, Minnesota SMITH BARNEY. HARRIS UPHAM & COMPANY. INC. MInneapols, Minnesota MARQUim BANK MINNEAPOLIS. N.A. Minneapolis, Minnesota JOHN Q. KINNARD & COMPANY, INC. MInneapoHs, Minnesota FBS INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. Minneapolis, Minnesota MERRILI LYNCH & COMP AN CMcago, Illinois)RVSs I NORWEST INVESTMENT SERVICES. INC. Minneapolis, Minnesota MWar, Johnson & Kuehn, Inc. BiMPl Mi HlWClrtBfctK. II AS I lit IS SVbllC MSASCf 3.30%1994 3.60%1995 3.90%1996 4.00%1997 4.20%1998 4.40%1999 4.60%2000 4.80%2001 5.00%2002 -2003 5.10%2004 5.20%2005 5.30%2006 5.40%2007 5.50% 2008 3.30%1994 3.60%1995 3.90%1996 4.10%1997 4.30%1998 4.50% 1999 4.70%2000 4.90%2001 5.00%2002 •2003 5.10%2004 5.20% 2005 5.30%2006 5.40%2007 5.50%2008 3.25%1994 3.60%1995 3.80%1996 4.10%1997 4.40%1998 4.60%1999 4.75%2000 4.90%2001 5.00%2002 5.10%2003 5.25%2004 5.40%2005 5.50%2006 -2008 $991,196.70 $1,972,090.80 5.1922% $993,235.00 $1.973,920.00 5.2029% $1,010,156.25 $1,974,080.00 5.2915% 29S0 Nor west Lenter 90 Sr jtr' Seventh Otreel Minneapoiis MN 55402-^ttOO iC i2) 3J9-S291 FAX (612) i'4u^-c' t.rr h. $2*000*000 General Obligation Sewer Improvement Bonds, Series 1992 CNy of Orono* Minnesota Monday* August 10,1992 Page 2 3-. S":a- r I NAME OF BIDDER i.v. I i”I JURAN & MOODY. INC. St. Paul, Minnesota DOUGHERTY, DAWKINS. STRAND A BIGELOW. INC. Minneapolis, Minnesota Peterson Rnandal Corporation k w rIfiI-'-Si i'' PIPER JAFFRAY INC. Minneapolis, Minnesota Moore. Juran & Company, Inc I I f.- , v;' DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS. INC Chicago* Ittnols LEHMAN BROTHERS CM mo* IMnois PRUDENTI.AL SECURITIES, INC Chicago, Illinois JNEWBBER. INC. In PAIN Chicago, Illinois PT & mm., ■. COUPON RATE YEAR NET INTEREST COST &RATE PRICE 3.40%1994 3.70%1995 3.90%1996 4.10%1997 4.30®/o 1998 4.60%1999 4.80%2000 4.95%2001 5.10%2002 5.15%.2003 5.30%,2004 5.40%o 2005 -2006 5.50%2007 -2008 4.10%,1994 -1995 4.125%,1996 -1997 4.30%,1998 4.50%,1999 4.75%,2000 4.90%o 2001 5.00%2002 5.10%2003 5.20%2004 5.30%2005 5.40%2006 5.50%2007 5.60%2008 4.30%,1994 -1995 4.40%.1996 -1998 4.60%o 1999 4.80%,2000 4.90%,2001 5.00%,2002 5.20%,2003 5.30%o 2004 5.40%o 5.50%o 2005 2006 -2008 $1,011,621.25 $1,974,400.00 5.2992% $1,013,334.05 $1,970,508.45 5.3081% ' V $1,022,711.50 $1.970,733.50 5.3573% te->v?rIf1^'- s i^' ^i. f.:. ?v.- f $2,000,000 General Obligation Sewer Improvement Bonds, Series 1992 City of Oreno, Minnesota Monday. August 10,1992 Pages I NAME OF BIDDER COUPON RATE YEAR NET INTEREST COST & RATE PRICE w Si ? ‘sf. 4 !■*■ I ■ c., Pr" P s& k- DAIN BOSWORTH, INC. Minneapolis, Minnesota KEMPER SECURITIES GROUP, INC CMcago, Illinois ^r.P-I-'Ip Pk W ■«;. ’feu $-■ :■■ '■ 3.50%1994 $1,043,231.25 $1,970,500.00 3.70%1995 4.00%1996 S.4648% 4.15%1997 4.50%1998 4.70%1999 4.90% 2000 5.00%2001 5.10%2002 5.25%2003 5.30%2004 5.50%2005 5.60% 2006 5.70%2007 5.85%2006 5.20% 1994 -2001 $1,046,132.08 $1,970,991.05 5.30%2002 5.375%2003 -2008 5.4800% 1 H Eo3 a. > (B QD % nm 03 09 K > lo Ol cn C/5 ^ ND C/i O ^ IC C4 z to C/« wt O N* to C/1 to Ol to 2 - to > ►- to C/l 1^ 2 - to C/l N<* to ;ri 4^ to CH 4)^ > ^ Ol yi ;-n p C5 C5 a «• IS)itk-w«cc c b CO to o c c 3 3 C c c s 3 1 a:e aa. h Kj O 3a.• Ni O *9* a 3 aj 03 5 ‘2 s S. H R) 5. D 3 33 3 5* 3a. jw H Rj {j» ? U}c V Q *1 B3 Os:a 5 D H X •f ••.« ‘ : V • - •*•. ■ '^ , ‘ >' '. >'7- ir ’ Is'ii I >■•.»* y-i''' ^>W' ■ iM-S fex:'' if:"' ^5rx'. f' ■ ir ^ f-*' m^f\. km^' P^' Ifcii iT'^^1-, if i'A'V' •te-: TO: FROM: DATE: Ron iMoorse, City Administrator Dorothy Hallin, City Clerk August 3, 1992 9> ^-r %. *■?> SUBJECT: Assessor’s 1993 Contract Attachments: A, Rolf Erickson Memo Dated 7/30/92 B. Copy of 1992 Contract C. Copy of Proposed *93 Contract I have attached copies of the '92 and proposed '93 Assessor's contract. The only changes to the propsoed '93 contract reflect the reguested compensation changes and the time period of the contract. These changes are indicated by underlines. te|5¥-mr|r - ■Srl-K.-: |S^:r ■ = p'^r:.. St iff' r-i*-r ‘ *. ir>. S-K^r.;'-.S^' V4 §#- ^-■‘ V-m nTO: Ron Moorse, Orono City Administrator FROM: Rolf Etlckson, 473-1644 DATE: July 30, 1992 RE: 1993 Assessment Proposal Term of Contract: September 1, 1992 throuqh August 31, 1993 Current contract amount:$67,000.00 Requested amount for 1993 Assessment:$70,080.00 Monthly Fee:$5,840.00 •> Wording of previous contract Is 0. K.. Please present new amount to the City Council at next possible meeting. J1 . V '•^'■ J\ X- mI»fe>^..,if.V "■ I •i-- (ru- ^i- t^' ;i.- '4 II"it: »■> !«' : V*s ■s'&. U:^ e;. '.C,t':. ',r * t. •■ m:y. V 4^* 4}0 ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT /frr4 13 THIS AGREEMENT made this 1st day of September, 1991, by and between the City of Orono, a municipal corporation hereinafter _ ^ _____ AM « • to "ASSESSOR”. as CITY" and Rolf E. Erickson, hereinafter called 1. Employment. The City, which is a separate Assessment District in the County of Henr.epin and State of Minnesota, does retain and employ the ASSESSOR to perform all functions required of local assessors by Minnesota state stiatutes, cooperate with the Hennepin County Assessor by supplying the needed information for each assessment year, and maintain a fair and equitable assessment for the CITY and its taxpayers. 2. Functions of Employment. Functions of employment shall include: Effective communication with residents, business people, and city officials regarding agreement practices and policies. Physically inspect and revalue 25% of the REAL property as required by law. Physically inspect and value all new construction, additions and renovations. Conduct valuation reviews prior to Board of Review. Approximate dates - March and April. Attend Board of Review, Per Board request, make all necessary review appraisals. Keep updated filed card file - current values, homestead and classification data. 7)Print, mail and post full year homestead cards. Process midyear homestead applications. ft) Respond to taxpayer regarding assessment or 31 -it.. I- Li. rt_‘, &-•■' 18) appraisal problems or inquiries periodically during contract term. 9) Make divisions and combinations periodically during contract term. 10) Initiate, for the taxpayer, abatement application periodically during contract term, as requested. 11) Make appraisals for, testify or negotiate all district court or tax court filings, periodically during contract terms. 12) Post values from appraisal cards to assessment rolls. 13) Valuation of all parcels in the City each year. 14) Analysis of property sales 15) Preparing assessment runs 16) Reviewing properties at taxpayer's request 17) Attend, not to exceed, three council meetings in addition to the Local Board of Review meetings. Provide when requested appropriate information and/or referral for persons requesting property appraisal related information. Such may in conjunction with the City be prosrided on a fee for service basis. 3. Performance of Services. The manner and used in the performance of services to be provided by ASSESSOR shall be under the exclusive control and direction of tne assessor. The ASSESSOR in performance of services shall not ix) be required to maintain office hours, (2) receive retirement benefits, (3) health insurance benefits, and (4) any other fringe benefits. 4. Equipment. ASSESSOR shall provide: V, - ’ 'i '% iL -;' .) pV^:W$m. ' •?;. ‘H-f. f-' His/her own transportation as he/she necessary for performance of services. deems He/she has 2 telephone lines (1 lncoming/1 outgoing) for his/her business anc will provide the City with a FAX number if one is utilized in the business. CITY shall provide: Necessary filing area for purpose of maintaining required city assessment records. Ail of the equipment and supplies necessary or required for performance of services set forth in this Agreement, including a 1979 or later set of aerial photographs. Pay for all direct expenses, including those forms and supplies, film, aerials and other miscellaneous and homestead material and postage. 5. Compensation. The CITY agrees to pay the ASSESSOR for such services the sum of $67,800.00 for the period 1 September, 1991 to 31 Augusc, 1992 payment shall be in 12 monthly installments of $5,650.00, commencing the last day of September, 1991, and continuing on the last day of each month thereafter through August, 1992. 6. Minnesota-Statutes. This Agreement has been entered into in consideration of the obligations and requirements set forth in Minnesota Statutes as the same apply to real estate assessing procedures. Both parties agree that any major changes in such requirements during the term of this Agreement shall necessitate a renegotiation of the compensation called for herein. 7. Representation b/ Assessor. ASSESSOR represents that he/she is a Certified and Licensed Minnesota Assessor under Chapter 273 of Minnesota Statutes and that he/she is a qualified real estate appraiser; further, that .'l T* :• ! M',- ■• ?w-.. ' ‘.y •\ s 'V" B.' i/?• r* ;ti ^- >r-,' # ♦■i'- > r* fi. [ ■> ;:r.v kf- ' *'•. I:v?v; ►;. '. j|. c: ■t* ^ jXi> •W\ 5^*,: L.. : • * : ■' • :-v.V/ V 'f"X-\ •• ;y( k:w pfc '• '>t- I V '•<* ■ I.-. '/;. • I he/she will during all times this contract is in ♦'orce maintain such licneses and qualifications. ASSESSOR agrees to attend the Local Board of Review Meeting on a date selected by the CITY, plus attendance at not more than three other City Council meetings in any one year. 3) ASSESSOR certifies that he/she has appropriate liability insurance in the amount of $1,000,000. 8.• Effective Date of Agreement and Term. This Agree ment shall be effective as of September 1, 1991, and employment of the ASSESSOR to perform the services to be rendered hereunder shall commence as of September 1, 1991, for the performance of the 1992 real estate assessment, and continue until August 31, 1992; subject, however, to extension as hereinafter provided. Either party may terminate this agreement on 90 days written notice. 9, Agreement Extension. This Agreement may be extended from year to year on terms to be agreed upon by the parties hereto by the parties agreeing in writing to the same on or before the first day of of August each year thereafter. If this Agreement is not so extended and terminates according to its terms, ASSESSOR agrees to deliver to CITY forthwith such records in an up to date manner as he has in possession concerning assessment of the CITY s real estate. It being understood that such records are the property of the CITY. 10, Independent Contractor. It is agreed that nothing herein contained is intended or should be construed in any manner as creating or establishing the relationship of co-partners between the parties hereto or as constituting the ASSESSOR as the agent, representative or employee of the CITY for any purpose or in any manner whatsoever. ASSESSOR is to be and shall remain an independent contractor with respect to all services performed under this Agreement, ASSESSOR represents that he/she has, or will secure at his/her own expense, all personnel required in performing services in this Agreement. Any and all personnel of ASSESSOR or other persons, while engaged in the performance of any work or services required from the ASSES^ R under this Agreement, shall have no contractual relationship with the CITY and shall not be considered employees of the CITY and any and mm:- ■ 1 \ .'7- V.' - ■v; • >> 0- b-.. V ^v' . -yi • i r ^ f all claims that may or might arise Compensation Act of the State of Minneso ® ^ perLnnel or other persons while so engaged, and «"y ^ Laims whatsoever on behalf of any such person arising out of employment or alleged ployment withoul limitatio'^n. Claims of discrimination -^a^t ^ ASSESSOR, his/her officers, agents, contractors *"P^°y®*® sha “ in no way be the responsibility of the CITY, and ASSESSOR Shall defend, indemnify and hold the CITY, ^ and employees harmless from any and all such claims ^ any determination of any pertinent tribunal, ^ commission or court. Such personnel or other persons requite not be entitled to any compensation, rights or of any kind whatsoever from the CITY including, limitation, tenure rights, medical and hospital care, ® vacation leave. Workers' Compensation, unemployment ccmpensation, disability, severance pay and P.E.R.A. 11. HoldHarmless. ASSESSOR agrees that he/she will hold the CITY, its officers and employees harmless from any clAnl suits or damages resulting from or caused omission of the ASSESSOR, his/her officers, *’®"“' "f or employees in the performance of the responsibilities provided by this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement the year and date above stated. CITY OP ORONO By Mayor By K'^'CHOl City Administrator ASSESSOR .:^u a'':. .■■ i 1. .- f yr- L'^ '* ■•. V ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT CL THIS AGREEMENT made this 1st day of September, between the City of Orono, a municipal corporation 1 992, by and hereina f ter referred to "ASSESSOR". as "CITY" and Rolf E. Erickson, hereinafter called 1. Emp1oyroent. The City, which is a separate Assessment District i.i the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota, does retain and employ the ASSESSOR to perform all functions required of local assessors by Mi'.-^esota state statutes, cooperate with the Hennepin County Assessor by supplyinq the needed information for each assessment year# and maintain a fair and equitable assessment for the CITY and its taxpayers. 2. Functions ~>f Employment . Functions of employment shall include: Effective communication with resiJents, business people, and city officials regarding agreement practices and policies. Physically inspect and revalue 25% of the REAL property as required by law. Phvsically inspect and value all construction, additions and renovations. new Conduct valuation reviews prior to Board of Review. Approximate dates - March and April. Attend Board of Review. Per Board request, make all necessary review appraisals. Keep updated filed card file • current values, homestead and classification data. 7)Print, mail and post full year hcmestead cardi:. Process midyear homestead applications. 8) Respond to taxpayer regarding assessment s'i4 >-r I 'SFT' 's. v ’»- • •;\r-1"iljyY^ ' \ •f'* ' 'fe'f. irti mw- ’^Sv.vr-'ij^ - ; V'.teS:' - ■mm ■. pft-iiv';it^- lir^'. •: ' ■ |S., %itr ■' WY- ' S^ ' -■ Ws~- #Efc- te. » Mk i>i- wmY n»»„ fa# W» n'i>- 'X‘^Y h > ? • m^wk - ■ 0&. xp-’-^r i. 1«) 11) 12) 17) 18) appraisal problems or during contract term. inquiries periodically Make divisions and combinations periodically during contract term. Initiate, for the taxpayer, abatement application periodically during contract term, as requested. Make appraisals for, testify or negotiate all district court or tax court filings, periodically iring contract terms. Post values rolls. from appraisal cards to assessment 13) Valuation of all parcels in the City each year. 14) Analysis of property sales. 15) Preparing assessment runs. 16) Reviewing properties at taxpayer's request. Attend, not to exceed, three council meetings in addition to the Local Board of Review meetings. Provide when requested appropriate information and/or referral for persons requesting property appraisal related information. Such may in conjunction with the City be provided on a fee for service basis. 3. Performance of Services. The manner and the method used in the performance of services to be provided by ASSESSOR shall be under the exclusive control and direction of the ASSESSOR. The ASSESSOR in performance of services shall not (1) be required to maintain office hours, (2) receive retirement benefits, (3) health insurance benefits, and (4) any other fringe benefits. Jv.m m-4. Equipment. ASSESSOR shall provide: 'Y- *•■: *■ S. » H -f. SKR'v;;'- II *: ' V'His/her own transportation as he/she deems necessary for performance of services. ■if&-1- .■v**- <-V'» -Vi-_ •■>■■*■ » >'-^k:V- i R, !«» p ^li*. *i-R- ;■■■!.■ F.'; tef- SS:'- # |rt; K. ■S‘,’^:--,.v % ■'»•■ - ^0m. ■ '■■ .-.v: 'X-''>'"r ^-- i*’’ ■ '■-‘';V;-' . P- ' Vh- pii"fe V. wm>^ # wi':': He/she has 2 telephone lines (1 incoming/1 outgoing) for his/her business and will provide the City with a FAX number if one is utilized in the business. CITY shall provide: Necessary filing area for purpose of maintaining required city assessment records. All of the equipment and supplies necessary or required for performance of services set forth in this Agreement, including a 1979 or later set of aerial photographs. Pay for all direct expenses, including those forms and supplies, film, aerials and other miscellaneous and homestead material and age.r • “ 5. Compte...nation. The CITY agrees to pay the ASSESSOR for such services the sum of $70,080.00 for the period 1 September, 1992 to 31 August^ 1992 payment shall be in 12 monthly installments of $5,840.00, commencing the last day of September, 1992# snd continuing on the *ast day of each month thereafter through August, 1993. 6. Minnesota-Statutes. This Agreement has been entered into in consideration of the obligations and requirements set forth in Minnesota Statutes as the same apply to real estate assessing procedures. Both parties agree that any major changes in such requirements during the term of this Agreement shall necessitate a renegotiation of the compensation called for herein. 7. Representation by Assessor. 1) ASSESSOR represents that he/she is a Certified and Licensed Minnesota Assessor under Chapter 273 of Minnesota Statutes and that he/she is a qualified real estate appraiser; further, that '■'yy'""- *•« ^ V'"4? -■•4 M .V • * •!' 'nC* •» ^--Bf^’- -,*^’ v»»*^»Sv-? ,. .- ■ .v- .r:,yy?'■•■Vv-^:'V j .-V •?^.? •'v Af. :?i.-T fm*-{.r' ' ' c’‘ 6feAii-v'. ^:r^4 m^v- ■ Sf#‘- >. ftF^' >‘* Si'::-- ttfi fm;:-]■'■■.■■:■. '■j];‘‘ '-i- ■ ^••- -4'" §mM.- |<|4 ^Si>s. m'm&il«" .-."'p '?, v>> •' -r. Fi;‘.P^f:‘ IpTw‘*__w: ' sii|i>-' ' miimi®:-::&4 he/she will during all times this contract is in force maintain such licenses and qualifications. ASSESSOR agrees to attend the Local Board of Review Meeting on a date selected by the CITY, plus attendance at not more than three other City Council meetings in any one year. ASSESSOR certifies that h«‘/she has appropriate liability insurance in the amount of $1,000,000. 8. Effective Date of Agreement and Term. This Agree ment shall be effective as of September 1, 199£, and employment of the ASSESSOR to perform the services to be rendered hereunder shall commence as of September 1, 199^^ for the performance of the 1993^ real estate assessment, and continue until August 31, 1992? subject, however, to extension as hereinafter provided. Either party may terminate this agreement on 90 days written notice. 9. Agreement Extension. This Agreement may be extended from year to year on terms to be agreed upon by the parties hereto by the parties agreeing in writing to the same on or before the first day of of August each year thereafter. If this Agreement is not so extended and terminates according to its terms, ASSESSOR agrees to deliver to CITY forthwith such records in an up to date manner as he has in possession concerning assessment of the CITY'S teal estate. It being understood that such records are the property of the CITY. 10. Independent Contractor. It is agreed that nothing herein contained is intended or should be construed in any manner as creating or establishing the relationship of co-partnars between the parties hereto or as constituting the ASSESSOR as the agent, representative or employee of the CITY for any purpose or in any manner whatsoever. ASSESSOR is to be and shall remain an independent contractor with respect to all services performed under this Agreement. ASSESSOR represents that he/she has, or will secure at his/her own expense, all personnel required in performing services in this Agreement. Any and all personnel of ASSESSOR or other persons, while engaged in the performance of any work or services required from the ASSESSOR under this Agreement, shall have no contractual relationship with the CITY and shall not be considered employees of the CITY and any and '"k■■ Vy . A ■■ f.A ->-‘r\Bii^i im.. pr"mm^ ^5'-te; "' arise under the Workers' Minnesota on behalf of said so engaged, and any and all WS'S: WA-' ^ all claims that may or might Compensation Act of the State of personnel or other persons while claims whatsoever on behalf of any such person or personnel arising out of employment or alleged employment including, without limitation, claims of discrimination against the ASSESSOR, his/her officers, agents, contractors or employees shall in no way be the responsibility of the CITY, and ASSESSOR shall defend, indemnify and hold the CITY, its officers, agents and employees harmless from any and all such claims regardless of any determination of any pertinent tribunal, agency, board, commission or court* Such personnel or other persons shall not require nor be entitled to any compensation, rights or benefits of any kind whatsoever from the CITY including, without limitation, tenure rights, medical and hospital care, sick and vacation leave. Workers' Compensation, unemployment compensation, disability, severance pay and P.E.R.A. |6e flips') Hold Harmless. ASSESSOR agrees that he/she will hold the CITY, its officers and employees harmless from any claims, suits or damages resulting from or caused by any act or omission of the ASSESSOR, his/her officers, agents, contractors or employees in the performance of the responsibilities provided by this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement the year and date above stated. CITY OF ORONO 4 By Mayor City Administrator ASSESSOR ..■*:? mm J'* W1 % V ■4 I? \ '-.i ^*-'^:a. m.;r; &>;■ /7 te-& Py- rt- . V - ♦t'^'.X,-* il~ .v';f ■.: TO: FROM: DATE: Ron Moorse/ City Administrator Dorothy Hallin, City Clerk August 3, 1992 Ot %4^ mb SUBJECT: Appointment of Election Judges for State Primary Election - September 15r 1992 h ...■ .. <<r :%- ' V'-:- r<:' ■ ' ' • * •• ''[ .. ■ ■'m- State Statute 204B.21, Subd. 2 states that thf City must appoint election judges for the upcoming primary election 25 days prior to the election. I have prepared the attached resolution listing the names of qualified persons who have indicated their willingness to serve as election judges at the primary election September 15» 1992. m It is requested the Council adopt the proposed resolution at the August 10f 1992 meeting. ^ru ,2K V: tes^v' : r*.5. .V, m0i Mm;’' •' •^'•*1WbbbA-- ■ //■ \ /-• V • .•2:i i;' r L ^ - •'. tltf' > ' -i■'1i-S1 i 4r I j‘l ■:? .V iaiKr|,mp. -,. Ifc ■ ‘^^■■ K-'•.•'«•'■. t^'-."\.r i ■■' '■" 'LV>‘.y ^.'.f.,ms m-^k\ *.•-'. ’• ,^’,' p* ■" A RBSOLOTIOM APPOINTING ELECTION JDDGES FOR THE PRIMARY ELECTION TO BE HELD SEPTEMBER 15, 1992 y.p" irr.v mT th^. ‘-\ BE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to Minnesota Election Laws 204B.21 Subd. 2 the following persons are appointed as election judges for the Primary Election to be held September 15,1992. m:-"- u -S®f ft. ,, ■i-i V-' AI Ackermann Vernice J. Berg Beverly Bloomberg Bonnie David Norma Jean Dickey Patricia Drummc .id Ruth Eisinger Betty Ekeberg Val Elliott Eleanor Ferril Dorothy Finkelstein Wanda Fischbach Carole Frommelt Acliss Gadbaw Barbara Garcia Ruth Garlock Marjorie Gasch Kathleen Gossman Jan Johnson Christine Peasley Marni R. Platteter LouAnn Powell Dorothy Rauschendorfer Joyce Shemanek Ruby Si ford Cherry Stubbs Helen Toward vji>‘ ■ 'I Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, fe;;s5r=:i.'-vr - Hitfitesota at a regular meeting held August 10, 1992. 'WB'. i'ki.i Barbara A, Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: V '-j Bp*., Pp D»orothy M. Hallin, City dlerk Ip ' Mi. liPl&feK ■ Bis T. ' llV’ '"T5L1 M A J 4 1 4 4 , 1‘! ^.**-.•1- -^{41?;;: .V,-^7-r^i'-: ■ ■ •*'. i-.' • -.wt. VH-.^c■ Ul^ i,-\ ^T0S Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Mborse, City Administrator Oi>n i % i Dates Subjects Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning 6 Zoning Ad August 5, 1992 J Tl Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 4 Stubbs Bay MUSA Boundary ‘f % List of Bzhlbits ■>. ^mr Exhibit A - Resolution Exhibit B - Memo 6 Exhibits of 7/24/92 biseussl Wm ifpf;#; Please review the memo and exhibits of July 24. Briefly, this is Amendment No. 4 to the 1980 Orono Community Management Plan* The purpose of the amendment is to include the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project Area within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area. Planning Coanission Recoamiendation it-. Rv-1- •v: J^r r A public hearing was held pursuant to notice of a special meeting of the Planning Commission on August 3. There were no comments from the public. On a vote of 5-0, Planning Commission recommended approval of Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 4. ' V*** *Staff Recommendation >• I c• ' A y'Staff recommends adoption of Comprehensive Plan Amendment Mo* 4 per the attached resolution. te" V ' • ■■?■ ■ \rv .'i-'-;. ■ ' . •* » Isv i- - >■ wm • ^ mmi- '^v-, ■ -im i-r % .P. 0 •V- i ■ts 0^:m 1/ • r : %r‘- :» r ■•' V. *»> i"'.: -'■--r., rA' ■ &A-.- ; ■ SIk-- ■ Y. 'rt. i. li • *- Ai«;P®1. If .Vi'- A., s'lt: A RBSOLOTION APPROVING PREHENSIVB PIAN AMENDHBNT NO. 4 WHBRSASf in June 1980, the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") adopted a Community Management Plan (hereinafter "CMP") to provide for the orderly development of the City. An integral part of that plan provided that sewered areas of the City be included within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (hereinafter "MUSA"); and MHBRBASr the CMP identified five specific areas within the rural zones of the City as requiring Alternative Waste _ ^ «1^.110 1. UX. CA JU AVAIVO wa. ------- r ^-----------------. - W 1Nanaoemttnt Studies to review existing sewage disposal problems ” . _______^4 VTA AT"AAS Ifi theiild !^.Vtigate One of thele five areas is the long-established Stubbs Bay neighborhood, an area of existing residential development; and WHBRBAS, in 1988 the study entitled Stubbs Bay Alternative Waste Management Study found that extending municipal sewers to the Stubbs Bay area was the only acceptable and/or feasible alternative for long-term waste treatment and disposal in consideration of the options set forth in CMP 6-44; a*^ci WHBRBASv as a result of further review in 1991 and 1992, the Orono City Council expanded the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project Area to include the "Cygnet" rural one acre located immediately northeast of the Stubbs Bay area (Map 12, CMP €-42) and the Oxford Road development immediately sou^theast or the originally defined Stubbs Bay area, which abutts the lakeshore of Stubbs Bay; and WHBRBAS, in July 1992, the City filed an amendment with the Metropolitan Council providing for the inclusion of the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project Area within the MUSA; and 1IBBRBAS, written notice was sent to surrounding local units of government and other affected jurisdictions requesting written comments by August 10, 1992 but no oral or written comments have been 'received by the City; and WHBRBAS, on July 23, 1992 at a regularly scheduled meeting, the Metropolitan Council approved the Comprehensive Plj** Amendment to Include the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project Area within the MUSA boundary as proposed by the City; and Page 1 of 2 I ■J V^ ......m:'>i:^r .4f'y>PPy ii. ii. W‘^- 4$h M- Ip. Cf t'J -.'ji rV is *?#>-’■' SVi.l K k‘ Kit';-i'-’:, i ■ i^ V ? »■ • V WHBRBASf pursuant to legal notice the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 3, 1992 to receive public comments regarding the proposed MUSA amendment, at which time no public comments were forthcoming; and WHBRBASr the Orono Planning Commission on August 3, 1992 recommended approval of the proposed amendment on a vote of 5-0. HOir» THEREFORE, BB IT RBSOLVBD tha-^ the City Council of the City of Orono hereby amends its Community Management Plan by designating the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project Area (legally described and mapped per the attached Exhibit A) to be vlthin the Metropolitan Urban Service Area, finding that: 1.The Amendment meets the intent of the basic goals, objectives and policies set forth in the 1980 Comprehensive Management Plan. The Amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives, needs and desires of Orono residents. 3.The Amendment is consistent with the planning goals and objectives of Orono*s municipal neighbors. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota this 10th day of August, 1992. ATTEST; Dorothy N. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN } The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of August, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M, Hallin, Mayor 6 City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. MM Notary Public Page 2 of 2 rW«Li-:aas:-aj;,. r- ■P L ' i. . M: *.-'» Resolution No. Exhibit A PART XVI (STUBBS BAY) Beginning at the southwest corner of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 5, To^ship^ll? North, Range 23 West; thence north along the centerline i:sfiSrto‘‘tsr„rrrh:;eVt°cirrr tLi%% ninutas^ 11 seconds east a distance of 550with the north line of Section 5, Township 117 North, Range 23 West to the west line of Riedel Company Stubbs Bay Addition; thence northerly alone the west line of Lot 3, Block 1, Riedel Company Stubbs Bay Addition to the northwest corner of said Lot 3, ®*fr easterly on a line parallel with the north line of Section 5, Township 117 North, Range 23 West to the centerline of the Luce Line Trai , thence southeasterly along the centerline of the J'^Lot 9 its intersection with the extended northwesterly 1 Auditor's Subdivision 203; thence northeasterly along the extended northwest line of Lot 9, Auditor's Subdivision 203 t~ ^^^L^f Street of Leaf Street; thence northerly along une centerline of to a point 263 feet south of the north line of Section 5, described line and its extension, to the centerline of Watertown Road; said line being described as follows: A line running from a point in the north line of ' northeast corner thereof to a point in the ° _ Section 5 distant 263 feet south from the northeast corner thereof. thance easterly along the centerline of Watertown Road to ^ts intersection with the extended east line of Lot 2, Block 2, ® ® Addition; thence south 0 degrees 18 minutes 45 a of 733.28 feet; thence south 89 degrees 48 minutes 45 seconds e»®t » distance of 330.77 feet; thence south 0 degrees ^8 minutes east a distance of 1,044.81 feet; thence westerly along the south line of Lot 6, Block 3, Swan Lake Addition to the northeast 2, Block 1, Routson Addition; thence westerly along the lit 2, Block 1, Routson Addition to the northwesterly corner thereo^^ thence southwesterly along the west line of said Lot 2 *^ts l?or78 f«t to its Interslction with Out lot A, Routson Addi^ion^ thence continuing southwesterly along the southeast ^ Block 1, Routson Addition to its intersection “ith th® ®xtension of a line described as being parallel with the west line of section 4^ Township 117 North, Range 23 West, distant 450 *®®t «®®^ line; thence south on a line parallel with the «®®t 1/"® Township 117 North, Range 23 West to North, Range 23line of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 4, Township 117 North, Range 4— •Vj., ■ ■V r r -'^ - cii'i .^i<.P-|r- ■ !^V West; thence westerly along the south line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4 to the west line of said Section 4; thence south along the centerline of Leaf Street (County Road 84) to its intersection with the easterly extension of the north line of Lot 11^ Block 1, Stielow's Addition; thence westerly along said north line to the northwest corner of said Lot 11; thence southeasterly along the west line of said Lot 11 to the southwest corner of said Lot 11; thence southerly along the westerly lines of Lot 12, Block 1, Stielow*s Addition, and easterly along the southerly lines of said Lot 12 to the southeast corner of said Lot 12; thence south along the east line of Lot 6, Block 1, Stielow's Addition to the southeast corner thereof thence westerly along the south lines of said Lot C to the southwest corner thereof; thence westerly along the south lot line of Lot 2, Block 1, Klitske's Addition, to the intersection of said south line with the shore of Lake Minnetonka; thence northerly and westerly along the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka to its intersection with the south line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 5, Township 117 North, Range 23 West; thence westerly along the south line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 5 to the point of beginning, and there ending. j .^s., . 'V T v^->V;^rS&s*- PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, AUGUST 3, 1992, 7:00 P.M. 1275 ERONN ROAD SOUTH - COUNCIL CHAMBERS ?■•<•'-;•-■ ■■ NCIL REPRESENTATIVE - J. Diann Goetten ATTENDANCE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS !• 7:00 p.m.Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 4 - Bay/MUSA Boundary Realignment, Presenter P. Gaffron Stubbs Michael 2.Other Issues iiv’M'- ^■0i ADJOUR few." Pt pc. 4fef-.■s PU^ C P-.r.life !-• •V* 'f‘- Mi' *-.si V' ."KiSL ■ if . -i' V ..•jj j/j J i 4 m- . ,m/r^ I.'./. .* 1 ??V . ' ■ V‘' lv>'^ i- i>,.., w. s *' . '■ Pi .V tm I .,<• Ik fe;'' ^;v;.r- hi"::k'-*- *-i:i ti.- »/ kV’‘ - fc-'*fe; |<i’- 'feh .■■I;'.-. TO:Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Michael P. Gaffron/ Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE:July 24, 1992 SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 4 Stubbs Bay MUSA Boundary List Of Exhibits A *> Existing MUSA Boundary Map B - Proposed MUSA Boundary Addition C - Legal Description D - Draft Resolution for Adoption by Council Discussion This is a public hearing to consider inclusion of the Stubbs Bay sewer project area within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) boundary. The MUSA line is a boundary established by local governments and Metropolitan Council to define those areas which are or will be served by the metropolitan sewer system. In 1980 Orono defined its MUSA boundary to include only those areas currently sewered. Subsequent amendments to the MUSA boundary were approved by the Met Council after construction of the Minnetonka Bluffs, West Ferndale/Marinas/Orono Lane, and Crystal Bay sewer projects. While the City in the past treated such MUSA amendments as an after-the-fact housekeeping process, the Met Council is indicating that Stubbs Bay and all future MUSA eunendments must occur before sewer construction. The Metro Waste Control Commission, which has jurisdiction over the Metropolitan sewer mains which serve Oron.>, indicated they would not grant approval to the MPCA to issue Stubbs Bay or future sewer project permits until a MUSA line amendment was approved by the Met Council. Because of the immediacy of the Stubbs Bay project, staff provided Metropolitan Council with all the information needed to process the Stubbs Bay MUSA boundary revision, and the Met Council granted approval of this amendment on July 23rd subject to the City's completion of the public hearing process. This amendment will be presented for adoption by the City Council at their August 10th meeting. .1 * ■ ■Ifci A f tail rfhiiiyi ■')£ v‘W-"r.p h'y' ^V' ix Pr.b-i:- ,-K ■ . ■ Memo July 24, 1992 Page 2 i-'■ '■ I'" sV.;: '?* < i-x f, , A- Pkm' ,-N. '.«V, ■■■ ^- f>i, V I/' k^lrut.^. tv *p >■ 1*.. ^TV V-> ••. '*T‘ |•:•v v'j ■ .-•i ’ii; it-?:..: it,If. fc. .f'- it- .M *. te ISA Boundary Anei snt The a1:^ached map and legal description indicate the proposed new MUSA boundary. Only properties which were included in the Stubbs Bay project area are involved. Although no future sewer extensions are anticipated to be needed outside the current boundary, any future expansion would require a future MUSA line amendment. Also, the capacity of the system downstream from Stubbs Bay would limit the nurober of additional future units to fifty or less in this area of Orcno. Note that while the Stubbs Bay MUSA boundary amendment is considered as Conp Plan Amendment No. 4, Comp Plan Amendment No. 3 (which updates the Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan and adds other already sewered areas to the MUSA) has been delayed since earlier this yex]^ pending staff submittal of additional requested information, which has recently been submitted. It has been indicated that Comp Plan Amendment No. 3 will result in a Met Council review of our rural development policies (2 and 5 acres zones versus Met Council s 64 units per 640 acres'* policy). Notice for the August 3rd public hearing has been published and notice mailed to neighboring cities, although such mailed notice is likely not required since there is likely no effect on those cities. The public hearing process is required for any amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, as indicated on page CMP 10-3. Staff R ndation Staff recommends that Planning Commission forward a recommendation to Council for approval of inclusion of the Stubbs Bay sewer project area within the MUSA boundary, per the attached map and legal description. ch i-'V; ■ h“'.' . 4 .H J I i »V, .f f.- f ■••,•• d"/ 'te h<-if ■r •'.v.: ■ ti:. ■'4^' ^'V •'■•■.:'" i.' - fe‘ •O > 3 Ccn > < H I C/) cotsin 0o zo > 50 K no szwzcn M <tn f*^ ^ » • » • Q »1 «1 *1 9 f« «V «• IV • • •I* •••»•■••«* yVf^f«|V«VltfVI«l*|VfV|| M M M »1 5r*3SS5^5SSr5 < M MO• r-? • MM* • M • o > K PI < M in Mo 2 I M •« « s o • o o *« cnstnz I •9zo Clnn H Sa M 1-4oz wziz la-1 -isss ir^..s if ® 5 ar * O I •• Q PI ■ at *« o n X*• M c n o ««o M«< c >r V 7 V • 9 • i t • IV rj _ 9 • >V • V • ^ M Mn sc M M • VO •% M M 9 9 • M 9 *< ft VInm sa •rV m n • IV °f ‘IV 1 IT •V• m «v *1 |V«< 9 9 ft IV So •V 9 •1 «V M ►- O M O <V • 9 » •49 9 •• zo ii H «V >zw > o ts ft-C MM l» 9 •— M 0 9 9 « M IV• 9 9 n M •4 9 IV 9 s iH • 9 IV IV o o X 9 9 O •V3IT • 9 m • O M M 9 O sc 03 > I •<•<m m • 9 IV IV 9 9 ?“ ft M C •< 9 9 IV IV M 9 M 9 9 9 IV Vf 9 M 9 ft 9 PS 9 IV 9 9 9 9 9 9 3 C/a CO 53 9 M IT 0 o9 9 - 8r p c ' '•% 1I 1 -I Vi I-: 4 h>^ r t‘- ■‘i:' r k'k fe I p?- 'r- |!-!» i b'i- 0 n;:-' ti- k- . s h P't I r’ ^:'-' ft 5 I' I y>* I. u:.* :w % rbJ pjft.. •^Viiii 2 Mali fsfill 1^u » I. 1 1 t1. 1 A 1 f ^x! i i :i 1 1':- ^5 ■U*« t ■i* • .v ftoiAiiS'iii-•- ■r:=:^X'-•• 'k'> ■- fe.*: ^m.r-’‘r?/,' ■• : ••• t';:iCi ; ■ i'®®v ||k ■'.... r . » 1# ■ '■ i?<V3g' lifr^ t.vC’.' pi^I-##' Sis'if^'-- .>r . :-^ ‘ = iP^ • ' • Wi>' P'V-' p-Si-, fXiiV;...., f'’j"<»'^‘--t ^ V'■ii> m7tm~ r • ♦'s^V ■ Wm 0 .s■*>^a /, ■'■■' ■ *:f TO: FROM: DATS: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator August 6, 1992 /A % vXXa\ /9 Va SUBJECT: Establishment of Work Session for the City Administrator Performance Review The City Administrator's one year anniversary date is September 9. A work session to review the City Administrator's performance should be schedu ^d for sometime near September 9. Possible dates are: . Thursday, September 10 or the week of September 21st In setting the date, the Council should provide enough time to complete the attached evaluation form. 'i1 1^ J t ■1 1 i ■j .‘J 1 1 , ■■.i -•—7^ V' w * • •’ '>1'' 'v;.1^"' ^ -1 M/•: 'r i#V“'- r , ." • r *'. ■ -*'# •* .'V ■■%■ ■ :: ■ V VV . ^ ■ r: . V’ . • ^'17* . tt Atipratsnl of PerforiiiBiic* CKy of: rosHloti: Dale: m M- ' :y-. . ./ • < ’ ^ ■'i -■■.?i<' i t1 I s 1 i\ \ i J. 4 w-CHy of________________;----— Evaluation of Chief Executive Officer E*pl#nations and Directions Performance Evaluation as Team DuiUling ll^luation as Team Duilding.................... 'f' ,. EvM..n.ion is bnsicslly n must be l.i«l.. 2. The liusi level between the evniunlee »n ^ ^ ncceptetl. 1: ^;...deteLin.t. Definifion of Roles A. City Council , condnc. nnnun. essessnten.s ^mp'o ”Xnirl'ne^d 0> when esplicit eommendetion, e.e due. B. . Chief Executive Officer ■"'' t.- I Accents the prospects of annual evaluations, evaluating the performance of the CEO. |»re-Determined Performance Standardsrrc-MCif;t ----------------- * ........." «; •'a.T.tra,*'^'“Tills is necessary In order to use the rating s Wajor Areas of ResponsibilityVlllJVI ------- gSBl ■ va ------------ irea. However* the evaluation is made of the major area. -ji-.-7' S ;M«ijor Arew of ResponsibilUy coni. ,,. Rnling Symbols Three rating symbolr are used t» make the asseasmenu as follows: E - E*....I. Exgeclalloas (performance Iras been above reasonable e.pecl.llon.) M - Meat. (performance Ira, a.tained a level of reasonable ..pec.a.lons, J Below Expectations (performance has been below reasonable .xpoC.llons) At Indicated ea.lier, without ,erm In order to help ovoid this ptMsIble that aniulguily will result m the use oMho terrn. ^Iblllty. tlio concept of ptrftmiwntt tiapdmdit »«<>• Bf'. fe- ■ 'i' V „ be noted that in connection -J;-td^r “d«^5l^rrx?eVM including the condilions llml bnve lo be met in order n ae •expectnllons" have been met. c*-* .2*. ii it t'- M V 'r'm •,Cb • -- vM. '■ I*-te'*: ' 1 .1.1 i .A \■ 'i• 'sTil . Vo.* - blA «a> Vr -fi •& fts' ■’Eight Mnjor Arens of nespoiislblllljr U.' 'V-Orgnnizntioiinl Mnnagfcincnt i-’C ' |*£" ■|ll»Fiscal / Business Manngenienl -A' Trogram Dovelopmenl and Follow-Througli tev..-’.pWfeH i'-- Relationship with the Mayor / Council Long Range Planning 6/ ■ ‘i- Relationship with Public / Public Relations ■ - ■* "iV _ yii. Intcrgovernniental Relations ." .-r «r- SMil.Professional / Personal Development i* ^ [ '■ r ..r- {'■- Wm:f *.* ■ - - v ’f .V,’ ‘v - ‘Ai • I i •1 ’J ■?y I'-V.!^f- ?'=■ ■'■ & Rating tei^- ■*;- >• '■’ - n^' ■ M BfiSCjyiiibiiilJt E 1. Organizational Management standard Organizational Management will be consitlered efrectivc when a majority of the conditions have been success fully fulfilled: k:‘. *'4'. I*- ■.4-yh . % Plans and organizes the work that goes Into providing services established by past and current decisions of Ihe Council. r'v. Plans and organizes work that carries out policies adopted by Council and developed by Staff. w;r ■ \n ^ i. ■ V 1 ? ■t plans and organizes responses to public tcqucsls and complaints or areas of concern brought to the attention of Staff by Council and Staff. a Evaluation and keeping up with current technology. a. Well qualified, promising persons are recruited and employed. b. Employees are appropriately placed, contributing to a high retention rate. c. Supervisory techniques motivate high performance. d. Complaints to Council arc not common. e. The organization is aware of new trends In technology. Selecting, leading, directing and developing staff members. i r : ^ 1 .... in,p,c upo.the Itfainwork facJQl) for ln.pr....B8 M= (Specific n.e, (0 .l..t need ,.r.ng.l..ning) . r-„.,.„.nd..ionr (A.c, (,) of pc.fo.«.»nc. dling for p,.i«/co«.n,eml..ion) V- Ia‘ ----------... nr .... CEQ: (.fc.Po,..cs .0 of .h. ,v,.u,.ion./comm.n.,/sugg„.i,n,/ commendationsj ■i T- -'r m, rm W-JJ'9 i 1 1 1 i ] ___ ,• t-" ■ / - * ■ *■viSv.,,, S^' fiating >-\ E pcsnonsibilitY II. Fiscnl / IJiisincss Mnnngcmcnl rerformance Standard riscal/Business Manngcmcnl will be conslderetl effcclive when a majority of the conditions have been success- fully fuirilled: a. Budget preparation and management are thorough and effective. b. Cost-cfrecllve measures ore persistently pursued. c. rinancial reporting is timely and readily understandable. d. rhysical racililies management is efficient. fa t*- ;1 I i',/’ ‘i ii ■ % Plans and organi/.cs the preparation of on annual budget with documentation, etc. that conforms to guidelines adopted by the Council. Plans, organizes and adniinislcrs tlic adopted budget within approved revenues and expenditures. Plans, organizes and supervises most economic utilization of manpower/matcrials/machinery. Plans and organizes a system of reports for Council that provide most up-to-date data available concerning expenditures and revenue. Plans and organizes maintenance of City-owned facilltles/buildings/equipmcnt. Comments: (Observations of livalualots: . r . \ use this snacc also to indicate tlie impact upon the leqniwQfK fagiflt) i>^tfiest|nns for linnrovenient: (Specific area (s) that need strengthening) f ■ - ■ c_\ ' • Commendations: (Area (s) of performance calling for praisc/coinmendalion) •w-w._^mments of the CEO: (Responses to any of the cvalualions/comments/suggestlons/ ^ ' commendations) mf'' : '■ «■ j ?# ' p=?; i ' y ' ' rt!<■ * '•♦nr- ^MH-.-: S^*'.;'/?} ■» r Resn onsibilitv III. rrogrnin Dcvelopmciil and Follow-l hrougli rerforniance Standard Program planning techniques and procedures will be considered effeclive when a majority of the conditions have been successfully ful- rilled: Plans and organizes on-going programs and services to the City government. Plans and organizes work involved In researching program suggestions by Council and Staff and the reporting of the results of analysis. ifv^' Maintains knowledge of current and innovative trends In (he area of scr .re» being provided by local governments, and Incorporates that knowledge In program suggestions and research. a. Ongoing pr jrams and services are ft.«y responsive to the City ’s needs. b. Monitoring procedures are In place and functioning well. c. Measurable outcomes (to the extent possible) are used to determine success In program planning. d. The CKO can be epended upon to follow through. . Makes most effective use of available Staff talent. Plans and otganizes work as.signed by the Council so that It is completed with dispatch and efficiency. rf.r Plans, organizes and supervises implementation of programs adopted or approved by Council. Comments; (Observations of Kvaluators: . r . i use this space also to indicate the impact upon the l^flmworH faciQl) .V-. ' t -»/ v' ‘ •Suggestions for Inmrovcment : (Specific area (s) that need strength**nlng) Commendations: i X/. .* '-t* A ft- - ■*f7nmments of the CKO: (Ucsponscs to any of the evaluations/comments/suggcstions/ commendations) h>: Ci imp^y,-r{;v f-’v • W- ■“tt*' K'v., Wr ■iiViv-:i i "f ■H fv- ^ '... 'y>.: r---r H' m- B - > • ^V" Bating E IV. ResDonsiMiLji Rclalicnsliip with Mayor / Council rerTormance Slffodard M D Relations with the Mayor/ Council will be consWered effective when a majority of the conditions have been successfully fulfilled: Maintains effective conimunicsUions, both verbal and written, with Council. Maintains availability lo Council, either personally or through designated subordinates. Establisl and maintains a system of reporting to Council current plans and activities of the Staff. rinns and organizes materials for presentations to the Council, cither verbally or written, In the most concise, clear and comprehensive manner possible. a. Materials, reports, presentations and rccommendn- lions are clearly and convincingly made. b. Communications are made m a timely, forthright, and open manner. c. Responses to requcsls are made promptly and completely. d. Recommendations appear to be thoroughly researched.^ e. Adequate Information is provided to Council to make decisions. r. A system Is In place to report to Council current plans, activities, events of the City. »Uo' o.......... “PP" fn. In'n.ov.n.ePi: (Specific are, (.) .I.a. need sueng.l.ening) ________...ions: (A.ca (0 of pe.foMuanc. calling for praia./con..n.nd,.ion) ________.a of .1.0 cm: (Responses lo an. of............ coinnicndations} »■'.4'-r ■^■•->'\j'i\yr?.'•'■ ii'iSPfit- '' ■ i'^"’ '” ' SU-.'"' ‘ I Rntfiia E V, l^^snonsibility Long Rnngc PlnunlnR Performance Standard SIrnlegic planning will be considered effective when n mtijorily of the conditions have been successfully fulfilled: Mniniflins a knowledge of new technologies, systems, methods, etc. in relation to City services. Keeps Council advised of new and Impending legislation and developments in the area of public policy. plans and organizes a process of program planning in anticipation of future needs and problems. Establishes and maintains an awareness of developments occurring within other cities or other juri.sdictions that may have an impact on City activities. a. A well-constructed long- range (slrnte^^lc) plan is currently !»» operation. b. Annual operational plans are carried out by Staff nteinbers. c. An on-going monitoring process Is In operation to attain oualilv assurnncfl in program and project Implemen tntion. d. Program evaluation and personnel evaluation are Inler- relatcd with the strategic planning process. e. Legislative knowledge is current and complete. plans, organizes and maintains a process for establishing community goats to bo approved or adopted by Council and monitoring and status reporting. .i:;';:rn'Jic„e.... in..,nc up«n the i»,viiwork factor) |,„,|....inn. fnf InmiovcmciU: (Specific c.c» (s) ll.al need sUcngUicning) te'-I----------- (Area (a) of pctformance calling for praisc/cornmcndalior.) V' !v ■r»pmmenta of the CCQ: (Responses to any comiucndations) of the cvaluations/comments/suggesllons/ P' ' if!,' , . V •f*.' V 4 Wff. ’ \;.-. ■• P^iyp<;)nsibilitj^ performanc e Slandaiil B VI. Rcl.ilionship w«lb Public / Public Relations B Communication services will be consitlered efrective when a majority of the comlilions have been successfully fuinited: either by phone or In person. Ensures thnl «n Mliturfe »nd feeling of helpfulness, courtesy nud sens.lj.dyJo public perception esisis m employees coming In eoninci with the public. a. Contacts with the inetlia nre timely and credible, b Publications ate varied and consistently well-received by (he citizens. c. Tcedback from the public and the community leadership is positive. Establishes and maintains an image of the City to tha community that represents serviceg vllalily and proicssionalism. posnivc. d. City has good Image with comparable organizations. Establishes and maintains a liaison with private non-govcrmncntal agencies organizations and groups involved in areas of concern that relate to services or acllvlties of the City. ItiU ‘°:”7hi.‘Zce [iso'lo Tmiicm. .be impoc.Upon the t*Tmwnrk faclQt) c for ImorovcuMl: (Specific ere, (,) .hut need e.r.ng.h.ning) ,mm.nd..io..y : (Arcu (r, of performunce Cling for preire/commendulion, ........... .ho CEO: (neM.on.ro, .o uny of I.......... coniiuciiclntions} • V iiln '-.Vemri.y J* ilp:^i <'' v fil^ E VIII. rrofcssional / Tcrsonal Pcvcfopmcnl ResnonsibilitV Performance SlanUard t'" I-'., h ••■., 'i y M D Professionnl end personal competencies will be coii- sidercd effective when a majority of the conditions have been successfully fulfilled: ti S'*- I' Maintains awareness and value of broadening professional and personal development. Demonstrates imaginative leadership initiatives. Ability to build cohesiveness in Staff. Decisiveness in leadership performance. Effectiveness in verbal communication. a. Management techninnes^ show evidences of innovation, imagination and decisiveness. b. Synergetic techniques are fostered. c. Verbal communication is commendable. ^ romments: (Observations of Evaluators: use this space also to indicate the impact upon the teamwork factor) ---------------■pv" 7- '' |g»«.«Mtlons fnr Imnrovcment: (Specific area (s) that need strengthening) rnmmandntions: (Area (s) of performance calling for praise/commcndatlon) tv fe. rnmnients of the CEO: (Responses to any of the cvalualions/commenls/suggestions/ commendations) fc. it- m':X. te: ; • - : ■ wmz-. 1. -ir f % .mL ■ ..t ..A. mm5.-1^; '*Wt performance SUffJatdE VII. Intergovernmental RelationsM D tniergovernnieninl relations will be consUlered effective ^ when a majority of the coiuh tions have been successfully fulfilled: Maintains a^vareness of developments nnd plans In other jurisdictions that may relate to or affecl City government. i r-'*' ‘ r. %- j '. I#- Establishes and maintains a other governmental jurisdictions •"J”®*® areas of service that improve or enhance the City ’s programs. Involved or interfaces. Sufficient activity with municipal and professional organlMtions. b. Regarded as lender by municipal officials, c provides examples of gooti ideas from other jurisdictions. d. Positive relationship with surrounding cities. ^ e. Good cooperation with County and State agencies. ■Vv. U^t rn. ■n..,.ov^ (Sp«mc »,« (s) .1- "«-• (A,en (.) or P..ro..n,n« Clin, for p,»i«/con...nd,.ion, 2.-V " . ■, • t '*< ■ -. ®:?i-’',y*-.fe TO: Mr ' V FROM: - DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator August 6f 1992 ¥%r %/. ^^/> ^ /o%y % % ....SUBJECT: Resolution to Establish the Interest Rate on the Stubbs Bay Sewer Assessment Roll • t'- mi ■>h wmm ■*^rS ... , . 'V*;:. ■ iii-:' The interest rate on special assessments is generally set at 1 1/4 points above the interest rate on the bonds used to finance the improvement project. When the initial assessment resolution was adopted an interest rate of 8% was included in the resolution. Carolyn Crude of Ehlers and Associates is projecting the interest rate on the Stubbs Bay project bonds will be less than 6%. If this is the case the assessment resolution should be amended to reflect a lower interest rate. The amended interest rate will be based on the bonds to be awarded at the August 10th Council meeting. mWJp ‘- iiiP- mi lii # '1/ ----- V*i‘ >•. i . . t'S-) fe?' P RESOLOTIOH TO AMBHD THE IHTEREST RATE APPLIED TO THE STOBBS BAY SANITARY SEffER ASSESSMENT ROLL, AS ESTABLISHED BY RESOLOTIONS NO. 3145 AND NO. 3121 i . NHEREAS, the City Council of Orono, Minnesota established the interest rate on the assessments the improvement of sanitary sewer in the Stubbs Bay area at 8% by passage of Resolution No. 3121 and Resolution No. 3145, and si.■ Si WHEREAS, the City Council did intend to amend said interest rate based on the net interest rate of the bonds sold for the sanitary sewer improvement in the Stubbs Bay area; and K"-- ■ WHEREAS, the City Council has awarded the sale of said bonds bearing a net interest rate of _____%. *»' 7 A NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF OROHO, MINNESOTA, that the Stubbs Bay area sanitary sewer assessments interest rate is hereby reduced from 8% per annum to _____\ per annum. i:Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono at their regular meeting on the 10tn day of August, 1992. m:''V. ATTEST:Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor •Vr. ,ff Dorothy M. Haliin, City Cleric f -.i •I; ii t ii 1 i ■K 'I '■:■ A ' • ■£ a^i?::. " ^■^Sp';.-. -k# >m 't •' 4' Hfc: c:^/To Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Date:August 7, 1992 Sobject: Discussloii Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Adij^^strator y*<bStubbs Bay - Individual Property Resolutioi\^^ y%; '^S 9 ^ • ■V‘' 9i 7 9^ number ofThe Stubbs Bay Sewer Project Area contains a vacant lots as well as many developed multiple lots commonly owned as a building site but not legally combined. The Council has determined that some vacant lots will be served with sewer, but others won*t. Formal resolutions for each property will help future purchasers of vacant lots understand the City's position when providing or not providing sewer to those lots. Where developed properties include two or more non-combined tax parcels, the existing residence typically is primarily located on one parcel, and the Assessor's records normally place the entire valuation of the residence against that parcel rather than spreading it over the entire property. The City will levy the sewer assessment only to the parcel with the existing residence. The attached resolutions not only formalize the determination as to which parcel is assessed, but references the grouping of tax parcels as being considered a single building site. This will alert iny future staff. Councils, or members of the public making inquiry, as to the City's intent when assigning a single sewer unit to a property containing multiple parcels. A number of properties have relatively unique characteristics or unusual factors which lead to a determination on whether and how many sewer units would be assigned. These Include: A. Lots 8 - 11, Block 2, Hillside Park (vacant 1.1 acres owned by Skip Gage). B. 372 Westlake Street (three lots with a residence and two rental cabins) C.324-332 Westlake Street (Blake Bichanich, two lots, house and cabin, to be combined ) D.220 Bederwood Road (Gustafson's three lots totalling 2+ acres) E.85/105 Cygnet Place (Ehalt's commonly-owned homestead lot and vacant parcel) .t- r-T-lt '•;• ; If • '' ..: ■ »■ ■■ ^>- \ R’ . ''*> ■ r->'' '-T, J . i-" fe'i r> .»^ < •a''- t: f • 'kv Jrx !v-' ■m ?Et'': V-':' V.* ■Vr ;<• ’-5 •'S- Stubbs Bay - Individual Property Resolutions August 7, 1992 Page 2 Only the first of these resolutions has been drafted. The rest will be forthcoming at your next Council meeting. The resolutions will be placed in the individual property files for future reference. Where appropriate and feasible, resolutions will be filed with the Chains of Title. Staff Ra datlon Staff recommends approval of resolutions regarding the assignment of sewer units for the following properties: Vacant Lots Developed Multiple Lots lots ”3320” Bayside Road Bayside Road shoreline ”235” Tonka Avenue ”245” Tonka Avenue ”300” Tonka Avenue ”305” Tonka Avenue ”350” Tonkawa Road (Lots 8-11, Block 2, Hillside Park) 3382 Bayside Road 3770 Bayside Road 3865 Bayside Road 222 Bederwood Road 285 Crestview Avenue 370 Leaf Street 280 Tonka Avenue 330 Tonka Avenue 309 Westlake Street 341 Westlake Street Proposed Motion: Moved by seconded by to approve resolutions regarding the assignment of sewer units in the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project, as noted in the staff memo of August 7, 1992. ___Ayes, ____ Nays. Isv jiiiiMiiuu JSl % tit: ' 'V ■ 4 .••1 V l^Ev'-sS-ri;*','IfeW& A RBSOLDTION DBTBRMIMIM6 THAT SANITARY SEWER SERVICE mu. NOT BE PROVIDED TO VACANT PROPERTY LOCATETt AT ”3320* BAYSIDE ROAD KNOWN AS LOT 9, BLOCK 6, BAYSIDE ADDITION TO LAKE MINNETONKA s * WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project was initiated by the City to solve existing on-site sewage treatment problems in the Stubbs Bay area, within which Lot 9, Block 6, Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka, is located; and WHEREAS, the aforementioned Lot 6 is described for tax record purposes as PINS number 05-117-23 14 0047, and is under single separate ownership, not owned in common with any other abutting or nearby property; and WHEREAS, all adjacent lots are occupied; and WHEREAS, the total acreage of the parcel is approximately 0.19 acres, of which approximately 0.09 acres is dry land and 0.10 acres is considered as flood plain area and is transected by a creek; and WHEREAS, the total dry land area of 0.09 acre is extremely substandard as compared to the existing regulation of the LR-IA zoning district requiring 2.0 acres per buildable site; and WHEREAS, said parcel is not buildable without many variances from the existing zoning code; and WHEREAS, construction of a single family residence on the parcel could not be done according to all zoning performance standards of the LR-IA zoning district in which said Lot 6 is located, and therefore would be contrary to the intent of th<» Community Management Plan; and WHEREAS, said Lot 6 has been valued and assessed for tax purposes at a rate reflecting the non-buiIdability of the property; and Page 1 of 2 L#; ■tiji.rv-; <• K^ L-I« B V r» :4*J •iif« r ' .’ V •.0I' ■/. I k- ;- Kv :V A HBSOLOTION DBTBRMINING THAT SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WILL NOT BE PROVIDED TO CERTAIN VACANT PROPERTIES LOCATED BETWEEN BAYSIDE ROAD AND STUBBS BAY WBBRBASr the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project was initiated by the City to solve existing on-site sewage treatment problems in the Stubbs Bay area; and WHEREAS, within the Stubbs Bay area are contained a number of vacant lots and parcels lying between Bayside Road and Stubbs Bay, said parcels providing lake access to properties on the inland side of Bayside Road; and WHEREAS, said properties are substandard in area and depth so as to be considered non-buildable lots; and WHEREAS, said lots will not benefit from the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project because che City would not allow any use of said lots which woui.d require connection to the municipal sewer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the following parcels listed by PINS numbe's will not be provided with sanitary sewer service as part of the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project, and will not be assessed for 05-117-23 that project; 23 0035 05-117-23 24 0112 05-117-23 24 0023 05-117-23 24 0115 05-117-23 24 0039 05-117-23 24 0316 05-117-23 24 0069 05-117-23 24 0117 05-117-23 24 0070 05-117-23 24 0118 05-117-23 24 0082 05-117-23 13 0045 05-117-23 24 0083 05-117-23 13 0047 05-117-23 24 0084 05-117-23 13 0048 05-117-23 24 0105 Page 1 of 2 ......................■; III i' V ill run -- iff .■ i' Lvl' ;p ''■* » Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota on this 10th day of August, 1992. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor STATE OP MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrtiment was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of August, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor 6 City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 2 of 2 % gf V t':i V Sr htM V.nr r?-£vt:p-'ly.-:r- S.'?- % 'V Jm s? S’f i 't A RBSOLOTION DBTBRMIMIM6 THAT SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WIIJ. HOT BE PROVIDED TO VACANT PROPERTY LOCATED AT ■235” TONKA AVENUE KNOWN AS LOTS 3 AND 4, BLOCK 3, BAYSIDE ADDITION TO LAKE MINNETONKA WHEREASr the City of Orono i*? a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREASr the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project was initiated by the City to solve existing on-site sewage treatment problems in the Stubbs Bay area, within wl ch Lots 3 and 4, Block 3, Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka, aia located; and WHEREAS, the aforementioned Lots 3 and 4 are separate adjacent tax parcels owned in common by a single owner, being described for t' Tcord purposes as PINS number 05-117-23 13 0024 and 05-117-^J iJ 0025, respectively; and WHEREAS, the adjacent Lots 5 and 6, Block 3, Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka, are vacant lots which are intended to be served by municipal sewer; and WHEREAS, the total dry land area of Lots 3 and 4 is approximately 0.29 acres, as compared to the existing zoning regulations requiring 2.0 acres per buildable site; and WHEREAS, said parcel is not buildable without one or more variances from the existing zoning code; and WHEREAS, the owner of said Lots 3 and 4 has declared to Hennepin County that Lots 3 and 4 will be allowed to go tax forfeit; and WHEREAS, said tax forfeiture would give the City the opportunity to allow said Lots 3 and 4 to be sold to an adjacent property owner to increase the area of the adjacent property; and WHEREAS, two of the three properties abutting Lots 3 and 4 are substandard in area and would become more conforming in area by incorporating said lots with their existing holdings; and Page 1 of 2 i -I<•;. ’ •r '' 4 i' • :v ft:: If : yy f^-:. fersv-.' WHBRBASr by allowing said properties to go tax forfeit, the property owner gives up any substantial property rights for use of said property, and therefore the City's refusal to provide sanitary sewer service to said Lots 3 and 4 would not deny the property owner of a substantial property right; and WHEREAS, the parcel is unbuildable unless sewer is provided or the property is attached to adjacent vacant parcels because of insufficient room to provide for house, well, and primary and future septic system drainfields. HOW# THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota that sewer service will not be provided to Lots 3 and 4, Block 3, Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka, because the property is substandard in area, is intended by its owner to be allowed to go tax forfeit, is adjacent to other vacant land which will be provided with municipal sewer service and to which this property could be attached to create a single buildable site that, while still substandard, would more closely meet the 2 acre requirement for a buildable lot than would the properties taken individually. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota on this 10th day of August, 1992. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of August, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instriiment was executed on behalf of the City. * v.,«Notary Public Page 2 of 2 w.'•' .S' • rIf.;'E.-; /. y^- i^n-r ti'v> t,: i'Sl''6-1.-n V H r 1 P"h\ t.;tir». !;'■ I. Hwf I ^^:r; », ii..ft 1^" fe?‘: yp. Mf A RBSOLOTIOH DETERMINING THAT SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED TO PROPERTY LOCATED AT *245" TONKA AVENUE KNOWN AS LOTS 5 AMD 6, BLOCK 3 BAYSIDE ADDITION TO LAKE MINNETONKA WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation orgaiiized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS# the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project was initiated by the City to solve existing on-site sewage treatment problems in the Stubbs Bay area, within which Lots 5 and 6, Block 3, Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka, are located; and WHEREAS, the al orementioned Lots 5 and 6 are separate adjacent tax parcels owned in common by a single owner, being described for tax record purposes as PINS number 05-117-23 13 0026 and 05-117-23 13 0027, respectively; and WHEREAS, two adjacent abutting parcels directly north of Lots 5 and 6, namely Lots 3 and 4, Block 3, Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka, are currently vacant and the property o%mer of Lots 3 and 4 has indicated to Hennepin County that said lots will be allowed to go tax forfeit; and WHEREAS, the total dry land area of Lots 5 and 6 is approximately 0.29 acres, as compared to the existing zoning regulations requiring 2.0 acres per buildable site; and WHEREAS, said parcel is not buildable without one or more variances from the existing zoning code; and WHEREAS, the potential future availability of adjacent vacant land could increase the total dry land area of the parcel to approximately 0.58 acres; and WHEREAS, construction of a single family residence on Lots 5 and 6, if done according to all zoning performance standards, would not be contrary to the intent of the Community Management Plan; and Page 1 of 2 m , , . ;/i' :■■/'^icv ■'i- f*-. riv, n:. > p fi'.? ■• i, ■>'- ir i. ■> # I |:h>t-- h i;m'':ik:> WHEREAS, failure to provide sewer service would make the parcel unbuildable because of insufficient room to provide for house, well, and primary and future septic system drainfields; and WHEREAS, the sewer will be available in the street or right-of-way adjacent to the property upon completion of the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project. MOW, THB.IEFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota that it is reasonable to provide sewer service to the property so as to preserve a substantial property right of the owner. Sewer service will be provided to the property, however, providing this sewer service does not in Itself constitute granting of any zoning variances which may be required now or in the future to permit construction on the lot which variances if applied for shall be reviewed on their own merits and circumstances at that time. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota on this 10th day of August, 1992. ATTESTS Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, ^yor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN } The foregoing instriiment was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of August, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 2 of 2 f'K ’’-r ^:fr, W '• t- I V. • A- 1: P' r;-;' I'. ■»; 'v ?>■ ;r? ■. y 7^>T A RBSOLDTION DETERMINING THAT SANITARY SEWER SERVICE IffILI. BE PROVIDED TO VACANT PROPERTY liOCATED AT "300* TONKA AVENDE XNONN AS LOTS 17 AND 18, BLOCK 5, BAYSIDE ADDITION TO LAKE MINNETONKA WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation or9anized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project was initiated by the City to solve existing on-site sewage treatment problems in the Stubbs Bay area, within which Lots 17 and 18, Block 5, Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka, are located; and WHEREAS, the aforementioned Lots 17 and 18 are legally combined for tax purposes into a single parcel, legally described as: PIN number 05-117-23 14 0042; and WHEREAS, said parcel is under single separate ownership not owned in common with any other abutting or nearby properties; and WHEREAS, all adjacent lots are occupied; and WHEREAS, said parcel is located within the LR-IA Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District, requiring 2.0 acres per buildable site; and WHEREAS, the total dry land area of the parcel is approximately 0.29 acres, not meeting the 2.0 acre requirement; and WHEREAS, said parcel is not buildable without one or more *“riances from the existing zoning code; and WHEREAS, construction of a single family residence on the parcel if done according to all zoning performance standards would be contrary to the intent of the Community Management Plan; and WHEREAS, failure to provide sewer service would make the parcel unbuildable because of insufficient room to provide for house, well, and primary and future septic system drainfields; and Page 1 of 2 . .'1.iu. V I:. r-v fe-.. !;■ p;;■^ Pv; W ? -i;' M ?!• H* ii-r* If LV‘*' 1.‘ ^ r.-:- I r. NBBBBA8, sewer will be available in the street or right-of-way adjacent to the property upon completion of the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project. HOW, THERBFORB, DB IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota that it is reasonable to provide sewer service to the property so as to preserve a substantial property right of the owner. One sewer unit will be assessed to the property and one sewer stub provided, however, providing this sewer service does not m itself constitute granting of any zoning variances which may be required nor or in the future to permit construction on the lot which variances if applied for sha 11 be reviewed on their own merits and circumstances at that time. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota on this 10th day of August, 1992. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA } ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of August, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M, Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 2 of 2 Rs«¥-A-'!fe:- '- '>/. ri" H., 1-. ■1^- #■ ^V W::. W' r.ivj, ^ tA ■ *».'?>-. c- I*.; Pvte' ! II, ii£-:|:W- A BBSOUITIOII DBTERNIHING THAT SANITARY SBWBR SERVICE WILL HOT BE PROVIDED TO VACANT PROPERTY U)CATED AT "305” TONKA AVENUE KNOWN AS LOT 1, BLOCK 4, BAYSIDE ADDITION TO LAKE MINNETONKA WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project was initiated by the City to solve existing on-site sewage treatment problems in the Stubbs Bay area, within which Lot 1, Block 4, Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka, is located; and WHEREAS, the adjacent half of vacated Hill Street has been combined for tax purposes with said Lot 4 into a single parcel legally described as: PINS number 05-117-23 13 0029; Lot 1, Block 4 including the adjacent half of vacated Hill Street, Minnetonka Bluffs; and WHEREAS, said parcel is under single separate ownership not o%nied in common with any other adjacent property; and WHEREAS, all adjacent lots are occupied; and WHEREAS, said parcel is located in the LR-IA Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District, requiring 2,0 acres per buildable site; and WHEREAS, the total dry land area of the pare 1 is approximately 0.20 acres, not meeting the 2.0 acre requirement; and WHEREAS, said parcel is not buildable without many variances from the existing zoning code; and WHEREAS, construction of a single family residence on the parcel could not be done according to all zoning performance standards, and would be contrary to the intent of the Community Management Plan; and Page 1 of 2 Im . . -tai fi-i I • ■Ai • - ^,•h. V * NON, THBRBPORB, BB IT RBSOLVBD by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota that sewer service will not be provided to the property known as PINS number 05-117-23 13 0029, because said parcel is too substandavd in area to be considered as buildable without a substantial number of variances. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota on this 10th day of August, 1992. ATTEST: Mf Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor STATE OP MINNESOTA ) ) 8S. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of August, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson 6 Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 2 of 2 1^:' .. ■ mmm 'K:, i::r ; • lii//*- f5' If'te # r;’’ ■'..'I'VV.' p/y p- y-^- ^ - _ k/<^- fe. jfc'V A RBSOLOTION DETERMINING THAT SANITARY SENER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED TO LOTS 8, 9, 10 AND 11, BLOCK 2, HILLSIDE PARK WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Stubbs Bay area sewer project was initiated by the City to solve existing on-site sewage treatment problems in the Stubbs Bay Area, within which Lots 8, 9, 10 and 11, Block 2, Hillside Park, (hereinafter “the property") are located; and WHEREAS, the aforementioned Lots 8, 9, 10 and 11 are legally combined for tax purposes into a single parcel, PIN #05-117-23 23 0026; and WHEREAS, said parcel is owned in common with the adjacent parcel to the south, PIN #05-117-23 32 0001, which is approximately 4 acres in area and which contains an existing single family residence; and WHEREAS, the property is a vacant .1.08 acre parcel located entirely within the LR-IA Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 2 acres in area and 200' in lot width for construction of a single family residence; and WHEREAS, the southerly parcel referenced as PIN #05-117-23 32 0001 is transected by the boundary between the aforementioned LR-IA Zoning District and the LR-IB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District which requires 1 acre and 140' in lot width for construction of a residence; and WHEREAS, the owners of said parcels, Edward and Barbara Gage, purchased the two parcels at different times from different owners, and said parcels were not in common ownership until Lots 8 through 11 were purchased by Mr. and Mrs. Gage in late 1990; and my I'’ ^ i ' ■ Page 1 of 3 ‘4-. ■' i-Vm [. s 1 pr WHBRBAS, the southerly parcel (PIN #05-117-23 32 0001) has approximately 1/2 acre in the LR-IA Zone and 3 1/2 acres in the LR—IB zone; and L' I • NHBRBAS, the stated intent of the property owners is to maintain the potential buildabillty of Lots 8 through 11 as a separate building lot; and WHBRBASf Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (A) 2 states as follows: "2. In *R* Districts of Greater Than One Acre and Served by Public Sanitary Sewer. A lot of record in any 'R' District iy. vi* f* 's'-'- in the City in excess of one acre, which does not meet the reguirements of this zoning chapter as to area or width only, maybe utilized for single family detached dwelling purposes if the Council finds: a. It is at least 1 acre in size, and the average width of the lot is at least 100*; It is served by public sanitary sewer; It otherwise meets the requirements of this chapter or applicable City code provisions"; and b. c. >WHBRBAS, the City Council finds that when the property is provided with municipal sanitary sewer, the property will in fact meet the provisions of Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (A) 2, finding that: A. The property is 1.08 acres in area and 210* in width; The property is served by public sanitary sewer; The property can otherwise meet the requirements of this chapter or other applicable City code provisions; and B. C. WHBRBAS, without the provision of sewer service, the property is not buildable without one or more variances from the existing zoning code; and WHBRBAS, construction cf a single family residence on the property if done according to all zoning performance standards, would not be contrary to the intent of the Community Management Plan; and and and and WHBRBAS, a buildable envelope of approximately 150* in width 123.5* in depth is available without encroaching on the 50* front rear and 30* side yard requirements for the LR-IA Zoning District; Page 2 of 3 iM"'- *fe- NBBRlfAS, failure to provide sewer service would make the property unbuildable because of insufficient room to provide for house, well, and primary and future septic system drainfields? and WHBRBAS, sewer will be av .lable in the street right-of-way adjacent to the property upon completion of the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project; and WHBRBAS, it is reasonable to provide sewer service to the property so as to preserve a substantial right of the property owner. HOW, THBRBPORB, BB IT RBSOLVBD by the City Council of the City of Orono, that one sewer service will be provided to the property. The City Council hereby acknowledges that providing sewer service to the property results in a change of status of the property from "not buildable unless variances are granted" to a buildable status based on the provisions of Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (A) 2. However, provision of jewer service to the property does not in itself constitute granting of any variances to zoning code performance standards which may be required now or in the future to permit construction on the lot, which variances if applied for shall be reviewed on their own merits and circumstances at the time of such request. day of ATTEST: Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono un the , 1992. me Dorothy M, Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Petersen, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of _ _ __ _ _, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Page 3 of 3 Notary Public A,u ^V r k,. :.- ‘ - » '• ■>-u. i' I I. lb ^ . (i- ' *=; ft sl U I Wf if'tet-.' -* Jb"' ]4£uL^ A RBSOLDTION DBTBRMINl.^G THAT THE PROPERTY AT 3382 BAYSIDE ROAD SHALL BE ASSIGNED ONE SEWER UNIT AS PART OF THE STUBBS BAY SEWER PROJECT WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project was initiated uy the City to solve existing on-site sewage treatment problems in the Stubbs Bay area, within which the property at 3382 Bayside Road is located; and WHEREAS, the property at 3382 Bayside Road is located in the LR-IA zoning district and consists of five individual commonly-owned adjacent tax parcels identified by PINS numbers 05-117-23 14 0033, 05-117-23 14 0034, 05-117-2? 14 0035, 05-117- 23 14 0036, and 05-117-23 14 0037, also known as Lots 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11, Block 5, Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka; and WHEREAS, these five referenced tax parcels in total contain an area of approxii.iately 0,92 acres, less than the 2,0 acres required in the LR-IA zoning district for a single building site; and WHEREAS, the five parcels as a group have long been used and are currently considered by the City of Orono as a single building site; and WHEREAS, the existing residence is located primarily on PIN number 05-117-23 14 0035- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota that one sewer unit will be assessed and one sewer stub provided for this group of five parcels, said sewer unit assessment tv be levied against parcel 05-117-23 14 0035. Page 1 of 2 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota on this 10th day of August, 1992. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ■V ' A :'Ki^*'r- % r ,?v. r ?'■.T, .■*•■■ 'i.Ui Kr A RBSOLDTIOH DETERMINING THAT THE PROPERTY AT 3770 BATSIDE ROAD SHALL BE ASSIGNED ONE SEWER UNIT AS PART OF THE STUBBS BAT SEWER PROJECT WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project was initiated by the City to solve existing on-site sewage treatment problems in the Stubbs Bay area, within which the property at 3770 Bayside Road is located; and WHEREAS, the property at 3770 Bayside Road is located in the LR-lA zoning district and consists of four individual commonly owned adjacent tax parcels identified by PIN numbers 05-117-23 24 0100, 05- 117-23 24 0101, 05-117-23 24 0102 and 05-117-23 24 0103, also known as Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, Ottoville on Lake Minnetonka; and WHEREAS, these four referenced tax parcels in total contain an area of approximately 0.35 acres, less than the 2.0 acres required in the LR-IA zoning district for a single building site; and WHEREAS, the four parcels as a group have long been used and are currently considered by the City of Orono as a single building site; and WHEREAS, the existing residence is located on PIN nximber 05- 117-23 24 0101. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota that one sewer unit will be assessed and one sewer stub provided for this group of four parcels, said sewer unit assessment to be levied against parcel 05-117-23 24 0101. Page 1 of 2 ifi n-rk' 7- - !• V'-'. •s..t: : * •’ -■-. •. ■m:• r> »• • k 1.' p. 5 m. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, this 10th day of August, 1992. Minnesota Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Attest: Dorothy K. Hallin, City Clerk STATE OP MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of August, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor 6 City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public - * .* • V m Page 2 of 2 t|r- •.YJ:- ■ .Ij. . V • ■s- W'r' u y*r'Kr t f* k. C4:. >■■* ^lr.’ ‘ 1^Mjt v^- A RBSOLDTION DBTBRMIMING THAT THE PROPERTY AT 3865 BATSIOB ROAD SHALL BE ASSIGNED ONE SENER UNIT AS PART OF THE STUBBS BAY SEWER PROJECT WHEREASr the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHERSASf the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project was initiated by the City to solve existing on-site sewage treatment problems in the Stubbs Bay area, within which the property at 3865 Bayside Road is located; and WHEREAS, the property at 3865 Bayside Road is locat»\'d in the LR-IA zoning district and consists of two individual commonly-owned adjacent tax parcels identified by PINS numbers 05 117-23 23 0008 and 05-117-23 23 0010, also known respectively as Lot 64, Auditor's Subdivision No.203, and that part of Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Hillside Park, lying east of the west 291 feet thereof; and WHEREAS, these two referenced tax parcels in total contain an area of approximately 1,8 acres, less than the 2.0 acres required in the LR-IA zoning district for a single building site; and WHEREAS, the existing residence is located on PIN number 05-117-23 23 0008. HOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of of Orono, Minnesota that one sewer unit will be assessed and one sewer stub provided for this group of two parcels, said sewer unit assessment to be levied against parcel 05-117-23 23 0008. Page 1 of 2 ■f ■ wc p.- t'v •H V ‘•Ih;.;^ V. •. ’i.- 'f*‘ rf fV jp:'" mf' t * v t:- Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota on this 10th day of August» 1992. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of August, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 2 of 2 uV'“ '■p.v^v r ■ :$. . .'i ;^V t- i'- ' fe N*'' r :^-’ ir-::-- w' L}.> Ha r V .fc!j. %i % I: I A RBSOLOTIOH DETERMINING THAT THE PROPERTY AT 222 BBDBRNOOD DRIVE SHALL BE ASSIGNED ONE SEflER UNIT AS PART OP THE STUBBS BAY SEWER PROJECT WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project was initiated by the City to solve existing on-site sewage treatment problems in the Stubbs Bay area, within which the property at 222 Bederwood Drive is located; and WHEREAS, the property at 222 Bederwood Drive is located in the LR-IA zoning district and consists of three individual commonly-owned adjacent tax parcels identified by PINS numbers 05-117-23 13 0006, 05-117-23 13 0009, and 05-117-23 13 0010, also known as Lots 30 and 33, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 203, and that part of Lot 35, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 203, lying south of the north 6 feet thereof, excluding road; and WHEREAS, these three referenced tax parcels in total contain an area of approximately 0.9 acres, less than the 2.0 ciCres required in the LR-IA zoning district for a single building site; and WHEREAS, the three parcels as a group have long been used and are currently considered by the City of Orono as a singles building site; and WHEREAS, the existing residence is located on PIN number 05-117-23 13 0010. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota that one sewer unit will be assessed and one sewer stub provided for this group of three parcels, said sewer unit assessment to be levied against parcel 05-117-23 23 0024. Page 1 of 2 Adopted by the Jity Council of Minnesota on this 10th day of August, 1992, the City of Orono, ATTEST : Dorothy M. Hallin, City Cleric Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor STATE OP MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of August, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Ma or & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 2 of 2 If I r: t- ifc.te, y • !!>“ ;^ ■ . b"' l.-i* J A- * ’f - - ;1 .» f ,*•! >' Vm p. I'r. j?1; %■P:H& 'V^ ■\'ar..i A RBSOLDTIOH DBTBRMINING THAT THE PROPERTY AT 222 BBDERNOOD DRIVE SHALL BE ASSIGNED ONE SENER UNIT AS PART OP THE STUBBS BAY SEWER PROJECT WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project was initiated by the City to solve existing on-site sewage treatment problems in the Stubbs Bay area, within which the property at 222 Bederwood Drive is located; and WHEREAS, the property at 222 Bederwood Drive is located in the LR-lA zoning district and consists of three individual commonly~owned adjacent tax parcels identified by PINS numbers 05-117-23 13 0006, 05-117-23 13 0009, and 05-117-23 13 0010, also known as Lots 30 and 33, Auditor's Subdivision No* 203, and that part of Lot 35, Auditor's Subdivision No. 203, lying south of the north 6 feet thereof, excluding road; and WHEREAS, these three referenced tax parcels in total contain an area of approximately 0.9 acres, less than the 2.0 «.cres required in the LR—lA zoning district for a single building site; and WHEREAS, the three parcels as a group have long been used and are currently considered by the City of Orono as a single building site; and WHEREAS, the existing residence is located on PIN number 05-117-23 13 0010. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota that one sewer unit will be assessed and one sewer stub provided for this group of three parcels, said sewer unit assessment to be levied against parcel 05—117—23 23 0024. Page 1 of 2 ..•*. .-...'J _Jrr- r* Adopted by the Jity Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota on this 10th day of August, 1992. ■ ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) } ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of August, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Ma^or & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 2 of 2 i-' >■f \I:' f.. IS" ■';i f-i. >;>• 'V kf. ■t" i H- f ,'»■ f-r-' % k a;'I 'kr<W- |:s tesi. A RBSOLDTION DETERMINING THAT THE PROPERTY AT 370 LEAP STREET SHALL BE ASSIGNED ONE SEWER DNIT AS PART OF THE STUBBS BAY SisWBR PROJECT WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipa] corporation organized and exisving under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project was initiated by the City to solve existing on-site sewage treatment problems in the Stubbs Bay area, within which the property at 370 Leaf Street is located; and WHEREAS, the property at 370 Leaf Street is located in the RR-lB zoning district and consists of three individual commonly-owned adjacent tax parcels identified by PINS numbers 04-117-23 23 0004, 04-117-23 23 0005, and 04-117-23 23 0006, also known as that part of Lot 27, Auditor's Subdivision No. 230, lying north of the south 175 feet thereof; and WHEREAS, these three referenced tax parcels in total contain an area of approximately l.'i acres, less than the 2.0 acres required in the RR-IB zoning district tor a single building site; and WHEREAS, the three parcels !zs a group have been used in the past and are currently considered by the City of Orono as a single building site; and WHEREAS, the existing residence is located primarily on PIN number 04-117-23 23 0004. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota that one sewer unit will be assessed and one sewer stub provided for this group of three parcels, said ewer unit assessment to be levied againsat parcel 04 — 117 — 23 23 C004. Page 1 of 2 A RBSOLDTION DBTBRMIHIMG THAT THE PROPERTY AT 280 TONKA AVENUE SHALL BE ASSIGNED ONE SEWER UNIT AS PART OF THE STUBBS BAY SEWER PROJECT WHEREASr the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project was initiated by the City to solve existing on-site sewage treatment problems in the Stubbs Bay area, within which the property at 280 Tonka Avenue is located; and WHEREAS, the property at 280 Tc a Avenue is located in the LR-lA zoning district and consists Oj. 2 individual commonly owned adjacent tax parcels identified by PINS numbers 05-117-23 14 0026 and 05-117-23 14 0027, also known as Lots 9 and 10, Block 2, Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka; and WHEREAS, these two referenced tax parcels in total conta^n an area of approximately 0.29 acres, less than the 2.0 acres required in the LR-IA zoning district for a single building site; and WHEREAS, the two parcels as a group have been used in the past and are currently considered by the City of Orono as a single building site; and WHEREAS, the existing residence is located primarily on PINS number 05-117-23 14 0026. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota that one sewer unit will be assessed and one sewer stub provided for this group of two parcel 3, said sewer unit assessment to be levied against parcel 05 —11 <■'’23 14 0026. Page 1 of 2 '' ‘I •‘•tx ii mm f'i'itV I'r » fefei* ■■ • ^^^ » iMA'' 'M./r:1 Wm Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota on this 10th day of Augustr 1992. ATTEST: Dorothy M, Ballin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of August, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. \Ot'\ry Public Paie ^ of 2 .m-' ■ ■ ^-my /■m-mm-- . I -- »'V * s - f •<Wim'-0-'m ii Mi, m,.: A. t^,.v'St A RBSOLDTION DETBRNINIllG THAT THE PROPERTY AT 330 TONKA AVENUE SHALL BE ASSIGNED ONE SENER UNIT AS PART OP THE STUBBS BAY SEWER PROJECT WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota? and WHEREAS, the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project was initiated by the City to solve existing on-site sewage treatment problems in the Stubbs Bay area, within which the property at 330 Tonka Avenue is located; and WHEREAS, the property at 330 Tonka Avenue is located in the LR-IA zoning district and consists of two individual commonly-o%med adjacent tax parcels identified by PINS numbers 05-117-23 14 0040 and 05-117-23 14 0041, also known as Lots 15 and 16, Block 5, Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka? and WHEREAS, these two referenced tax parcels in total contain an area of approximately 0.29 acres, less than the 2.0 acres required in the LR-lA zoning district for a single building site? and WHEREAS, the two parcels as a group have long been used and are currently considered by the City of Orono as a single building site; and WHEREAS, the existing residence is located on PIN number 05-117-23 14 0040. HOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota that one sewer unit will be assessed and one sewer stub provided for this group of two parcels, sewer unit assessment to be levied against parcel 05-117 —23 14 0040. Page 1 of 2 ip- rr /■ k. I- i ?V' n.m- l^i P' V. m- u-r-y\ it ' i rpX- 5:--T=' >-■/." ; S>: '' ■ :; iS'i. r«' ■ 1f0* VJHhi' Wm,. ■r- a r ! ■. , ite. fc fe. I k-m ■-'3v-- mi'' 0 ■'■ •■'^r.. -i Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono# Minnesota on this 10th day of August, 1992. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrxunent was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of August, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson 6 Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 2 of 2 f,:/1' u, y-.x‘ t"' M. ‘fe %• ■ i'\'7. - 1- 'fer- A RBSOLOTIOH DBTBRMIMIIIG THAT THB PROPERTY AT 309 HB8TLAKB STREET SHALL BE ASSIGNED ONE SENER UNIT AS PART OP THB STOBBS BAY SEWER PROJECT WHBRBASr the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS* the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project was initiated by the City to solve existing on-site sewage treatment problems in the Stubbs Bay area* within which the property at 309 Westlake Street is located; and WHEREAS, the property at 309 Westlake Street is located in the LR-IA zoning district and consists of two individual commonly ot»ned adjacent tax parcels identified by PIN number 05-117-23 23 0020 and 05-117-23 23 0021* also known respectively as the west 207' of Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 2, Hillside Park* and that part of Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 2, Hillside Park lying east of the westerly 207’ thereof; and WHEREAS, these referenced tax parcels in total contain an area of approximately 1.6 acres* less than the 2.0 acres required in the LR-IA zoning district for a single building site; and Whereas, the two parcels as a group have been used in the past and are currently considered by the City of Orono as a single building site; and WHEREAS, the existing residence is 117-23 23 0021. located on PIN number 05- NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED* by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota that one sewer unit will be assessed and one sewer stub provided for this group of two parcels* said sewer unit assessment to be levied against parcel 05-117-23 23 0021. Page 1 of 2 'i >< .- 1%^ fW'- §U'; Mfir'-;:; S'- IL*.feV r-V ^kkh< Si'-'.;m:> ‘• ?.V ‘ I- L'^i*:- s:. l¥^r Pj- I'i' fe; ii'K* ■-A-' • Ir l‘ Ji- Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota this 10th day of August, 1992. Barbara A. Pet-irson, Mayor Attest: Dorothy M. Ha 11in. City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of August, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson 6 Dorothy M, Hallin, Mayor a City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said Instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public iri m :■Page 2 of 2 . '.it ■ ‘ >V. R •^rY.-t'f. . T: A RBSOLOTION DETERMINING THAT THE PROPERTY AT 341 WESTLAKE STREET SHALL BE ASSIGNE^i ONE SEWER UNIT AS PART OF THE STUBBS BAY SEWER PROJECT WHEREASv the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREASr the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project was initiated by the City to solve existing on-site sewage treatment problems in the Stubbs Bay area, within which the property at 341 Westlake Street is located; and WHEREAS, the property at 341 Westlake Street is located in the LR-IA zoning district and consists of three individual commonly-owned adjacent tax parcels identified by PINS numbers 05-117-23 23 0022, 05-117-23 23 0023, and 05-117-23 23 0024, also known as Lots 4, 5 and 6, Block 2, Hillside Park; and WHEREAS, these three referenced tax parcels in total contain an area of approximately 1.6 acres, less than the 2.0 acres required in the LR-lA zoning district for a single building site; and WHEREAS, the three parcels as a group have long been used and are currently considered by the City of Orono as a single building site; and WHEREAS, the existing residence is located on PIN 05- 117-23 23 0024. HOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota that one sewer unit will be assessed and one sewer stub provided for this group of three parcels, said sewer unit assessment to be levied against Parcel 05-117-23 23 0024. Page 1 of 2 : .j ,3 I p'% I' '.-• V: ■ V' ■' ‘ Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota this 10th day of August, 1992. ATTEST: • i ■kty Dorothy M, Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor STATE OF MIMHESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of August, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 2 of 2 V. ’ •-'’ ip‘- H-'” m .; • '-i./ >v'y.'- ft ' : [,-r-' • K'. * W« .;:;« :^K': '■U '■'H‘ i' ifc If- :^t. m Bonestroo Rosene cr'VH Anctertitc & V^l Associates ■nglneers « Architects QtH} O 8orr«af!A4 Pt Uohen W linr»^ ,mfpP f A'wr^M* ?t %AdfV*f* i V)fv4»4 kfn»m > ci.p'vi • Coo« I IlUirn G k»'u'^rPH Pf V;v^M M ^ PA HOiMM9 A PfWh A Gd*Sda PI • WcPtft. Pi lcnj-3 W PP 04«/to 3 *P i^iir« C iwmJt AiA j^fy A low^en. M<tfp A P|. M4A-lfM r frfUtf»W\ PJ M K >lHfl •! # Afopfioa AIA QcrAd C Sur94iHl PI P P! '•» ^4»y P t/^nCtt Pi »irM« Uirr^i Pr WfCAJiei p «jw Pr W I'^y. A */ P rp.rwwj*. \A/ Arif'V'' MYAAe*C lynrn ijmft I mjo*hi n >Ay 0 Prater PI KfAAefP • AAOfPWA **»• Ml>Hl ^ PI Vlirl A SC A P| 047 ‘P' Ojffifl J ftfgi^on Pi P h%l • • '»A^ ni ^Ijri l» ►! Mirs B Pr 1 Aivi ^ Ut PP • < A Pi ' V*at ' /»• rC !#•<* * *.i ^ • I «• ‘•sli.l'V/* P^ ( ««t Ml f Av*«P* l*k I ^ I ^ M »'.nin*iv M t iwiM ♦r^ '♦ jTi»*4rtl August 6. 1992 Mr. John Gerhardson City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 COb'MCIL MEETING AUG 1 0 1992 CITY OF ORONO R?: 139 Leaf Street Dear John Enclosed please find the preliminaiy plans for Leaf Street. The proposed curb line is shown on the plan for a 2S foot urban section. There is an estimated 30 trees that will be removed or relocated as a part of the sewer construction. In addition, there are several hedges that will be removed. The street construction will require tree removal in three areas that will not be imparted by the sewer project as follows: Area 1 would be from 11-bOO to 13-hOO where filling to construct a safe embankment will require tree removal. Area 2 would be from 22*b00 to 24’t'OO where filling will be required to construct a safe embankment and will require tree removal. Area 1 is along the west side from 24+00 to 26+00 where the pine trees are close to the street. The trees could be trimmed back, removed or relocated depending on the desire of the City. Please contact this office If you have any questions. Yours vciy truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Ctenn R. Cook ORCilk Enclosure ■ - A-" A 4 ^V .,5^,fi tl- |i;.,is- ■^r If" »:• ■I &■ If "; PV; •V;r^- m ■ -•- • V-fed:.; : S i^: • (-■- »... - :t , - ' ••. .• > •• ' • .■;■■ ? ..?r‘ m. *'.• ■•;?. % % 5^-v^^. ^I>' V- mt. LIST OF LICE54SES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR MEETING OF August 10 > 1992 _ ^6. % Septic System Installer - Clover Hill Co.., Inc Coppin Plumbing 1 Firearm Use Permit — Park Gun Club 3660 Sixth Avenue North #;"3- M3?**.**.-I'•' 'd- I ‘. ' ’ • • • *« • -i! '■i 'TJ “r ■• *-■■•, .;-^r ;v •X' ff OKONO (612) ft71-7357 Post OTface Box 66 Crystal Bay# MN 55323 SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERS license APPLICATION All questions must be answered. License fee, bond, 1. 2. 3. 4. CnW^cNj Pl^^VviftXOoBusiness or trade name _________ Business address O O C V j>c \^V c V s Business phone _ Residence phone Name of applicant or company representative holding MPCA certification 5.Type of certification held: ^^^^*^Insta. Certificate expiration date \ b Pumper 6.Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? Most recent year ---------- 7.Have you ever had a license revoked? Where? _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __—-- - - - - When?Cin OF ORiM) ^-FiHAHGE OFFICE rJUSOf) 8. 9. Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yes Do you pump out septic tanks? Yes - - No 01 CEH 50,00 CHECK. R 50,00RECEIPT-Wm YOU ffE4S6SO cool ROl 708:08/03/ SUBMITTALS REQUIRED: 1^1. $50.00 License application fee. 17^2. $2000.00 license and permit bond naming City of obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accepted. |/^3. $50-100-300,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance. ~p/4*. Copy of current MPCA Certificate. LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED List persons other than applicant who are authorired by you to apply for permits under your license- - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - ix- and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinances of the Ci^ of Orono. \ r~ I ^—*72Date j? -^g. Applicant's Signature CITY USB cmLY Staff recommendatio^<^^^^prov^ Reason for denial: Denial Date City Council Action Date Date license mailed _ _ _ Approved Denied ?/- r-> %'p . ■/ ii ?' i-;' S, . V ; V SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERS LICENSE APPLICATION “CITY of OKONO (612) 473/73(57 Post Offics/Box 66 Crystal Bayr MN 55323 All Questions must be answered. License fee, bond, Applications are subject to a ten (10) day approval period. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Business or trade name ^ juU tv //< (I—^^-C. Business address I ^0 __3. ^ Business phone ^5 V P_ Residence phone —--------— Name of applicant or company representative holding MFCA certification dosS' C( f\ ---------------------------------—— /2< Installer .SCI_ _ PumperType of certification held: _ Certificate expiration date _ Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? Most recent year ---------- Have you ever had a license revoked? JXO----- When? ---------------- Where? _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ ___ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yes Do you pump out septic tanks? Yes No No X cm DF DRQHQ nSANCE OFFICE lJil50Q{ 01 CEH 50 CHECK TL 5t RECEIPT-iHAHK r, H248230 coot M |2Sio!oo\^f«n,rAAr;rrS;it^ro;d naming City of Orono as obligee. The State Plumbers Bond wil.l not be acc^ted.rv». iS 2, $50-100-300,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance, 77^ 4, Copy of current MPCA Certificate. ^p, SUBMITTALS REQUIRED: U^l LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARB SUBMITTED List persons other than applicant who are authorized by you to apply for permits under your license _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __—-—*- - - - - - - -- - The undersigned hereby makes application to the City Minnesota, for a license to install and repair septic systems, and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinances of the City of Orono. Applicant’s Signature Staff recommendation Reason for denials _ _ _ _ City Council Action Date Date license mailed Approved Date Denied - ' • —niii'niMrutiieh - ’ w 'yt. ' r- ':' ^ r U:.: < 'v^ ff^. : :■»; '.•t f: i'-' k.' y- t' tv ' .. 7i' <f: r r: i l^-:jt- I* 6&?r -f 'Sir' application for firearm use PERMIT CITY or OROMO DATE:r/.4^ /991. APPLICANl(VS NAME? APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAM*; JIjl/-' PROPERTY OWNER'S ADDRESS: 2^ LL )lj DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY; djLi,^ Zip TYPE or PERMIT: 925.99 AUNOAL (Club Only) S10.00 OCCASIONAL (15 to 120 Days) $25.00 GAME ANIMALS (Limited use) DATE STARTING: PURPOSE: LaJMAMAt. U^fl. OATS ENDINQI i^/ /fff 7 / RBSTRtCTIOHS: THToe a# f f wf VffyMUI agree that chl« permit doesn't allow the hunting of game bfiMify VnC£ or game animals in the City of Orono unless sped flea 1 ly io this permit and agree to abide by all applicable foder^.£l«lf ^•O' State and local laws. ^ SlA 71 S.O fiiCEIPMHm YOU ■u—7 Pee Paid: Date: Signstu^ of applicant RECOMMENDED: * \/ YES NO Check: Cash*Public Safety Director Initials: APPROVED: YES NO Wio cool ROi m. 07/22, REMARKS: City Administrator ;c„ tv.'" •I I?'- V' tk :' ■' m3’' * I*fv ‘ . H'.h:' ;i- ■ H' •V ,.-'/'-rv -- : -V- r^. >* .'.■' b; S': ■••w Ui ' .. '^K ‘ ^i...iw: -V- Date: Tos Prom: Subject: August 7, 1992 City Administrator Ron Moorse Chief of Police Stephen X. Sullivan Firearm Use Permit - Park Gun Club 1 hav« rovtawod th« «ppUo«tion from Park Oun Club to rauaw their annual flraatn uaa permit. As wa have not received complaints regarding thin organisation, I have no objection to the iaauance of this permit. ■t': I r i''" it-- m-’k" rns - { . V ■> - - -V I %r - .- .a 1. fe- tf’-aK^iv- ''*.1 ^*;-vk; * ,:j-\ kr„ -,y: ;4>:''fc->- ■■ r?.:i i?. ■-* •. r'■^■■7*.' 'f?4- i'Sl'iJii. . *.^ ■' ■ ■my'* y--%M^;Sm c?3 y 1 0C/fy OPn p:m' ^ O 9 ^ ^ ^ OI'**1 OI'<*1 »m09fa^vn(oo 9 Ul ^ 9 (II9 U« 9 U1 90M009999KI9 M €•» 9 m 9 UIC*I O 9 <D 9 9^9M9M00^^^9 W99909iH9^9M 9K»9K»99^K»*^9 9 ^ 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 C*> 9 9 9 9 J-9 9 9 9 9 9 W 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 g 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Swu»So«»w^9^0)Otn^- rsi 99^u> j-w^^9jji9 9go»®^» 0l^0>«»^W»^-O9-^O00CJNI 9Ni2?tri!I?J^iiirI«22Kl2oaoSSfS>«Oi9M0999IOO>00 O9009O00OOMOOM99 9O0JO9 9 9r^929 0»9»g®J2S2® IS3>-C*)<OCJOIWCJWO^-WO* 82SS8SSS;S§Sa52SS5SSSSSSS|2S-2gj.-o-=u;3S;ogj-3-go S3SS22SSSSS2ftn22SSSS3S2353S5SSSX2S§5S2-4.-S~^»»o m X •o pisir”r-maox _:r*"nmQim - ^Mn -<niQ<mxz «camqbxo2>z- z *s •’'■-•“58**>OZ X mz(/i xo ni5 j5vinir--_ m Cxm- u 90 Cm^xz Xs si * m > w >^C -n o feiSISSBBBiSS! . - -s °2.5ss;;»2zo;;3c ".o-o i?x>c<> n<.z, ^ m xr- m tj ^o*® . ? 0 9 m Ca|^»«C aIWWCJCaMD9W 9WCO99WWl-9W9Wl-l-WW®W9O>f-W9H.9W9WWWWJOWi0WWWW2j^J;-WJfW o -o I fl I K I I • 9 I 9 I I ^ I 4 I I €i'^9<O99CaO«09 9 ^ t* ’<«i ro 9 9 o ro 909€AlCJCJ9f0 9<0»- 99*«9UlfS>UIOO^O • •♦•••••••• •-* <*> 9 9 9 »>«9^39^J9«^^^J9 9 2cI»o«w»o>-u'H-ww»5®»^N»»3f3wooS^ «SIt3u»5ooM^ow» ssssssss5s::ss5;sso5«M5K5S2SSf2Si:D;sss^;~s2o»^«.o.^;-c.^, .. ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................’***’_-_ _________- « . ^ uiwrsiroN>fSj N) IS)KJ ro ^N) on rors>oo-^H-9<otJ<»oi iS22SSSSS2SSS22SS§23SS§§SS3S2SSSSSS§SSSSgS§SS:S 00 o-< 9-< 90 0»-*9M9U«99M09 99iJC*l9lSJ99 W9CJ 9Ul9UI*N499**ifl»^9 • •••••••*■* N>OIOMb4IS>^MN> A WWWJkWOTMW^O £J2S22222SS2SSS22225i22222SSSSt:iS2S5lS2SoSSSSSSS§2S 81 O W^oSS^SSooOOCJO 90 ►-«*!►-W 0>00090«> 9>-(O »-0>0»0 0 90 WtOUlOO-^ 99 WO 030 XI30 Om 9Z 9-< r.- s O) •*''IK-* 9 ^ OCJOOO 9 OICJH* W 09K»C*CI i/1990i N* 9IMOIOOI Cl U1M*^0»C* n X ■o !!:•■ ■ % m>o>c -<CDrnr--< moB—r“ 'n- r 30 0«H>rn 9 cmxz Q xz>-2 * • X -w pC4 S CD >• PI30 t ■'- i • . v*-- jl-'-:r 90BOn--< Q9M>>n >rnxao sr-XO Q •o ■^;:- t :||,,v ^99 019 OIOC09<0 r ■ V m- k‘ V 09999 I 0(0999 o-<9-H 90 H IS) 1 wMfs>is)rs)c M 9 1 09999 ox ■ 9 I XX ■ * 1 • « • • •Om ■ 9 1 09999 92 U OO 1 o 9-H r>o CD 9 3DiO m«D Ofo O no *o w m9 OM 8-0 w 9 tr'« i: L t. »m » m m % rOIV>MK>roroMisj CJCJCJU) OOOO dQiO)a» uiuu/i(^ »m m m » » N) rj tj o » » » » » » ISJKJ K)lSJ CJOJ oo CJCJ »» » » » » rorois3K)N>ro MMN>rsJMN> C a J CJ OJ (a > cj cj oooooo CJCJCJCJCJOJ oooooo roK) CJ o |SJN)NJMfsjro CJ CJ CJ ooo N>fSJ CJ o o CO o oo OOOO o oo 0*09 00 00 09 00 09 09 09 00 V,. o oo OOOO o OO OI OlOl OI flO OI 91 OI 0)01 CO COCO CO CD <0(0 CO coco ro loro IMrvjISJM fSJ totsj oooooo 0»0»00 09 Q»O0 ooo O 00 oooooo OI O) o o> o o o O) ooo C7) O) O) oo CD CD CO CO (O CO rjMfSJN) MNi CO ts> CO CD CO fsj Kjrs) CD K) s90 i 009 M04 -n^ I^C/l OQBOOCD r-f-r-r- ooon >(/) •o >>ccr OL mm toc/> § > (/>(/»€/>(/) iiSi(/)</)(/)(/) o o T| T| m m C90D ►Hl-i mm OO XXmm mm m o •H ^ 09 o mw 9D9D990 om 1-4 HI (/»</)</> </l m mm X X X X m mm </) m C/H/>OOOOOO >>>>>> OO rnTP-OTimm 9P;0 90 9D90 90 mm fAtn •n I -n » » » » » fSJto CJ o Oro o oo 0 01 CO to CO W OIOIO 146S317558134oo 09 CJ m H* H»Q rsj to rsj ^ fo ro O C7> C7) O (^ OI CD CO OI^UI^ li^COOlUI • • • • oo Old # •• UI • • 9 09 090 MMO • 9 9 ■ • uiui-s4ro(o cjooc^cr^ « OOoo oioui to oioi i/l CO OI OI cn C7I C7I tncn men H»UICJCO COH-O^ 0)01 fOK)men »w »»»»»» >>>>>>>>>>>> f-r-m r“1 -H r-r-m r"H- »•CO CO 00 <0 X» -I-I-C-IH-C -«1-4 -1 ^ ^m z HIH4HI94»HI-(;OZ90 m z z z z z zz f"m mmmmmm m m m -4 OOOOOO r-r-r--o om m m 9 z C/U/l (/></> CO to oon 8 z -4-^-1 > <0 CO CO CO CO CO 90 999 C' m ^o 9 m m m m m m noo -«m X X X X X X CO Z -H -H f-99 9 9 m CD mm >m r*-4 99 9 zm>>-4 -4 9 9HM-I </) X m99 f"o 9>rr-m HlOO ma -Hm > 5 C os m Om (/» O t-io o HI o 90 O m o m o iH 4/> m is> ui I CJ I I ^ooo CJCJ U>C a > I I I I CJLJCJCJ OI I I I o uirs>coco 00 1 I C0OI coco CJCJ I I I I CJl to t-o CO CO ro CO OOCDCO till CDOICOt^ CJ 'O I CO oo ro I I I ISJ CO I CJ OOOO 00 roto 1 Ic/u/i coco I • coco o o 0 1 »m »»» ’•9 )»»» 9 9 9 »»» 1 1 •1 t o n o o o *•z z z z z . ■*• • ‘‘ •• • .* • , • ' CO • CO 00 (O CO m m m I O C/) » » » I o (/) 1» I o C/) Xm </> (/)Om om 5'1 8 i OOOOOO O ^oo o >i ►-►-CJ o ! 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O 3 ^ 49 ^49 Ok O CJCJ coco CJCJ CJ CJCJfSJ K)CJ c , ro OkJ9CO CO CJ z !>oooooo o (OCJCO ro H*-4 -1 t ( 1 1 1 •1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 —enoro ro en Z jh'^tOM den coco»4fc OI o <0^(0CD coco en ococo CD CO * :1 1 1 » 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ^COCJCJH^CJ CD9«Ok Jk CO HI *1 ro(OH»t-ui99 CJ 'OtO ro to z < •s ■ it t-., %i' I I•M I, fe - . »■ /'NI »MNIM » NI •MMNI » €il »CJOJO w ►-»» 09 »in in in » CJ »» O o> <o ro mui fSIfSl milloo o c/> -4 30 »H CO HI o oo CDmm I ill I ill CD ooo 09 00 09 OOO ooo (0(0 CO MNJN) oooo oooooooo ooo -<-<-< (/)(/)(/> hm-H »-i TITItl OOO 30 30 30 ccr c -ti-n-n OOO 30 30 30 (/)(/)(/) OOO ^ I I I KJfSJM fOPOIM • I I fsifsj M 10(0(0 I I t CIU3CJ » » » I o 7C CO » «• » I o 3iC (/» K>MMMrOKlK)MN>fS) Kl 10 KJ ro fSJ ro M N) IS) ISJ <OCJC0(OC0(«3(O(OCO(O COOJCJCOCJCOC#1COOJLO oooooooooo 0909090909M090000 00 oooooooooo €FI 09 OI OI 01 OI OI O) O) (O CD CD (O C jD CD (O (O <0 (O N)rofsjK>r\iroK>roNJK) iH O N) iH <*>►- M fs> o 01(0 ^ooO)0^(0*«000(OQO OOOOOOOOOO iiiiiiiiiifii fv| ni ^ ni w ni OOOOOOOOOO f?i r^rn ni m ni m rn ^ a O O O CD O C) CD o 3D30303q30303030;o;0 *CJ't>"O"0’QT3-D-Q’TJ'O O § O O O O CD OCD OI zzacxzaczzzz (/></)(/)(/)(/>(/)(/>(/)(/)(/) *^<<^**^0000000 I I I I I I I I I I in m ui ill in tn iH ui ui <n 4 NHSJ K> K> Kl NI IS> K> M KJ 1 I I 1 I I I I I I inuiinNi^-^h-ooo <00>^^^N)N)0)CJO 0(ocd 4>^(D(D(D(oo I I I I I I I I I I (0C0(0^CJC0(JH-^O COISJ^-MCJ^-H-UINJO M »NINIM »NININI »NI >NI NIMNI *NINI NI »NI » OJ »OJ U) iJ OJ(«JUI •OJ » ►-»»»O » rOMM m ►-9-K-»» NI >^ Ik ^m ►- 1— ►-»Ik » » » » I O in MMNINIISJNI N) IS) N> NI Ni NI CJCJiJCJCJCJoooo oo oooooo o OOO OOO O 00 00 00 00 00 oo oo 00w \W'v.\ O ooo ooo O m (7) 09 09 09 09 OI 09 \ «D (0(0(0 (0(0(0 (O M NINIM MMM NI ooooo o opMoncooo oo oooooo 0> 09 09 09 O) <31 (O (D (0(0 (O (O N)MN)NININ> •-* ^ Ik tJ (a I9^ 09 OO 00 NIMMM 9-9-9^1-in in (AM NIOI Ik CO (0(0 oooo MMMM oo 00 OJ 00^9* (O N)M (0(0 (0(0 oooo oooo 09 90 0 « OO • 4 • • ^ «-l oooo MM Ok O (O OO 09 (D in Ok Ik in in in in oooo 00 (D in in 09 cn cj o ooooz888 XXX m m m •<>>>tttoOOO9-M-M-4 c ooo OOOznnn z >>> CD CD (D z <<<>>>rn m m ZZZ 9-4 z z z -<•<-<z oooo94H4l-(zzzooo CDo CD CD CD CD CD CD OOOOOO m in 8 nuuzzzzzz 9^Q^9^9^Q^Q^ z O cnm (/> (/> CO cn 00 </i (/un (/) (/ICO 00 888888 •-4 t-l l-l l-M-l > 00 fTi ni niffi rn 00</>(/)(/9 00</> -H zzz 1-4 94 94 m o ooo ZZZ Zzzzz(A (A (A o m 1 z ZZZ inoi m m -4 94 94 94 C Sooco CD CD CD CD —(CD CD -H -< -< oSzSo'o zzr-z:KO(/9(/)r-(/ic/9*n CD -< 00 C mmrnzi^(/9xOX3DOrnzc-oocap •ni-4< m X TJ (/Im z < o ooo M MMNJMMNI 9-|k 19 4k 9-9-9-o>in (Ain vn in in 1 1 1 •• 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 4k ^ «k^Xk 4k 49^^49 4k NI OO OO 00 9-9-9-CJ UlCJCJiJiJCJ 9*f— 9- 9-*in in in o (0(0(0000 o in in in k— !-• 9-in (0(0(0 010101 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 • t 1 9-men in 9-9-9-19 Oi Ik |9 4k 4k ^ M (D(0(0 MMM o oo oooooooooo (O 9^ 9«9«(0(0(0 oo ^ ^04k4k0 1 1 1 1 1 1 *1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CJ <0(0(0 CJCJ tJ O oooooo 9-^ ^ ^9-9-9-o OOOOOO » » I o z (/) » m 9 I O in » » In oo OXmoz o > ZZOZZO I-I m Z Qm 9-« O oo8 1-4z < z b (A (A Om <0 (O N» o ►-I o oz O m oz mo 9-1 (A 0 1 O I (O NI om ’ fcvN >|. r. irA-"' •/ N?':'.%r P'' ■ * ■I■• i." . ! «r r ^-/• t^v' %i. r'Mh *...' • •hp- I-' ?.; <•. iMMisirsifsifaroro UIC4CJUI KIKJfSiro KjroisiK) T’ ■I oooo H4MMMoooo (/!(/» C/)C/) zzcz ss su » » » » m m rsj M U> K> €h »» » » » » IS3fS> CJ rsj »m m m m » MM CO N) »» » » » N3 M CJ fS> »» » » » » NJro CJ N> O fON) U> K> rofSJ CO fsJ »» » » » ]» ISJM CO M Ocn » » » » IS) CJ io 00 men »— »— KJ OO 1— ►-*IS) ISJ C*ICJfD««4 OO men oo OOJ roNJ CD CO OOO^OO in Ml OO CJ CJ men ISJNI CJ CJ CDCJOfS)OO Ok #4 Wu oo oo enen 04^01 Cil oo cnen CDCD O) Oi Okik oo oo K)ISJ »»»»»9 » (OCD NJfSI OO oo OO oo o > 9Q o > ■n Tt 09 JO o m X M I X m m o ►-4 O n > :aD m 90 90m m >Om > X <-4c Oc/> •o > 90 u» "n o POm ►H X 00 90m O > om »» » » » rs>ISJ CJ oo OOOO O o O O o O O O O O 09 0# 09 00 09 09 09 OO 09 oo OO oo 00 00 "S.'S^V^X^V,\V.\\V, OOOO o O o o o o O O o o OlOIOJOl OI o Oi OJ o>0>O CD CD O) V*V.\\\ OCDtDO CO CD CD CD CD CD CD CO CD o fOKINJISJ ISJ fsj ISJ ISJ ISJ N)fSl ISJ NJ NJ ISJ ISJ oo OOoo -n m rn m m m 90 1 X CD r-> l-l rsi “D CD X CD -1 90 m •H fsi 90 m C9 90 r-m CO 90 CD m o CD o Ci H4 90 -<-4 OoXX-D m c«r~m m i-f CD 90 CD X X CD CD m m >o m 90 < 90 (X CD m o O z m CD z > JO O ozom CD o CDmm »» » » » m »»9 »9 9 9 9 »9 »»»•9 9 9 9 9 »»»9 9 9 9 9 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 o o o o o n n o o o X X X X X X X X X X CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD m O o > -<lm om iAn 90 -D •H o •-J o o o o O O O •*o > CJISJk^k-J9 K*►-•—I—►-►—1—CJ 4k O till 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •1 1 o k.Oi Di 4k Ok 4k 4k Ok o KJNJCDNJ CJ CJ CJ CJ N-CJ CJ NJ CJ 09 c rsJfsj^NJ CJ NJ 09 m CO NJ CJ 9*z ■fc.»— 9- CJI-*H*Oi ►-fSJ NJ ISJ •—CJ 4k m -4 V*• III 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •1 ' ■ muiN-Nj m o ►-O ►—NJ ►-NJ m m z b* ■CD CD •-4 NJ CO -•4 OI CD o il ■CO CO CD CD o CD 4k O CO m CD 09 1—• I-fill 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. COCOCJ^CD K*CJ ►—CJ o>CJ 4k CD CD 1-4 ;fSJH-k- NJ CJ CJ CJ en CJ ISJ fO z < om <o CD rsi O 1-4 o-n O 90o mo 90 nio 1-4 CD m 90 t i i K . -■-i 99 o 09 • 1 H- o o•1 J CD •ISJ ' ^ X ■ i m *11 CD > CD Om TV J*f‘r- fe? <«• 1/ !S^ ^N‘ K I-I K.'j. k- I- p; y;''rfev< si:". li'- ||i# »m m » % » fS>K>rOMKIMrofsjpoMfs^isj UWCJWU9CJ oooooo O) o> O) o> CJ> o> <0<040<DIDIO MNJfsjrafsiKJ M H* NfO 0IID0»<DO4Dfs> <DCi^*0»<aOO • ••••• • OtlDiKCOCJ^^ ^OCJOOtfsJOk XXXXXZfn ni f?i rn ffi OiIMH4I-40M0z^x<og<o ini n MMI-4 > </)(/></> </) » » » » » rorsjMMfsjKirOMMfSJ CO Cn) CJ U Ca) bO CO CJ CO CO <0 CD CO CD CO ooooo MOiMOtCO OOOOO O) Ok OD O) o> <0<0<0<0<0 rororsirsiNi coroOk (DK>0><00<^ COCDCOOOCO ^ O 0*^00 N> 5:X?4XD<c:cc:cc:(i^i fnrnnirn I I I I I </)</» </UO(/) r-f-r-f > rn ni^ni</> O O O O *H ni ftirn 3D C4C|C4»H0 i-»i <-<•<<01 X(/> »» » » » » K)M <0 <0 CO Oi O < > <m X i-io;os > 'V o o T1 IH »» » » » MfO <0 <0 9» » » » » fOMKJ fjlsjfs) CO coco CO COCO 000 (O <D <0 mm » » » » rofO CO CO o CO »» » » » Mro CO ro 00 »» » » » » ISJIS> <0 N> 00 O K> ro -0-0 rorjroro -0 'O r— r-CAcn COCO tn cn cn LH OCA UIUI LHcn » • (OCO • • 0000 COCO 0000 roisi r-r-0000 0000 1 • 00 09 00 »m »» m r-r*r-Cl n >>>c:X CD OCD z N4 PI rn f*)m "O r-r-r- CDCDCD X CD I o Xn X o > CD g ?D O »» » » » roISJ CO ro 'O ISJ 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 00 00 CO 09 09 09 00 09 09 V*V.\ 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 CD Dk Dk 0>O)o>C7k O) \\V. <c CO COCO CD CD CO CO CD ro ro ro ro ro ro NO ro ro u co^ ooO roro X XT —X I X 0 ►H mmi*m >> 0 xzz z ID 0 P* X ZZT z "D X -<X >000 0 </>0 -<000 -«X iA ccc -<*D rn ni 1/1 zzz 0 X z tn •on < l-H >0 l-C X rar •H >0 m 0 f m X zzz a CD -H mmm r-i 0 0 >>>><I 0 r"CO (/)(/) T» O 30 X (/> mo m I c: •-• mX om </>o M •D <0 ro 3 O -< o-n O 3D O ■V -I mo mo IM CD ^'’O'^ooo ^0000 0 0 roNjro 0 "Kj •0 > v; -.1 DiCOfO^r-r- 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 — 1 ►— 1 19 ^ ^ 1 1 » 19 1^19 1 19 1 19 ro 1 19 1 0 0s . M CO CO CO <0(0 CO <OCO<OCO<0 CO CO coco CO CO 00 ro ro c . rorororororo 09 09 09 091/1 0 CO rororo ui 0 CO ro z ___9 ) rororofororo r- ►—r- CD Ok ►-rororo 00 ro —1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 cnc/u/ir-oo 1 1 1 1 1 CAr-OOO 1 H* 1 ro 1 1 1 19^ Ok 1 0 1 U1 1 cn 1 UI z i CDCD^^OkCO CD *><CA Ok CA 000 00 <0 CO 0 0<OCD ^CDCD CD 9h CO coco CO 09 09 09 0 ►—CD 0 • 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 • I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' A*cococo co»-«r^CO CO ♦— *—(O 000 CD CD CD HC coN)H«cocoro ro covnuu/i CO ro 000 01 19 r-CO z < 1 O o Dr ro » » » I O X CD O X <D n m »9 9 9 9 </) CD m »»»9 9 9 > m »»»9 9 9 0 1 1 1 t 1 1 m 0 0 0 n n 0 n X X X X X X X </)(O </)t/k <0 CO (/) Om A wrf rv roa. V • 0 Nv, fe ’v Iv0 rt tiS? i” '■ . I li.Mr. l:>: aM '.i > |s'-- te' ,■ ,at .«-- k-v:^-’ ■■'y MM »MM MM »MM C a IM »CJCJ MM »MMmm0)0) oo »MM n CAM CACA u f-r- I I MM UIGJ CJM I I MM IOI0 I I MM mmmmm nmmmm CJUJCJ lOOl M M CJ M M Ci o> OIO) OI a> o cn tf) ^ M ►-CJ SS ii iSSSi i IHIHzz C/)</> ooooo ii « >>>>> l-l $ogmrn mm o 1-4 </) o»o» 0)0) m € M 19 OOOOOooooo -4-4-1 CO-#o C a )LJCJZU> I ■**>4 V) 00 1 I CJM t I MM UI40 I I CJLJ Ul^- » » m ( O 4/1 » » » » » M M CJ Cfl o OO oo ooooo O o O mm 00 09 «• 09 00 00 09 09 OO CO w \Vs OO OO OOOOO O O o OlO)0)0)O) O) O) O) O)O)O)O) 'vv.V.Vs \ CD CD oco CD CD CD ID CO CD (D CD MM MM MMMMM M M M CD M OMUI MOI*^ m m CDMO M’slUl (DMCD 9^009 MooMCDtno (DIDOOOO tnui c/itn 463 .463.)-* •— men oo • 99 09MCD MODI • > • CD (DM OOO oboooo OOOOOO OOoo MM 09 09 oo OO m »»»»9 Z m (/) O Om Q >>30Z >>>z>C9 i/I > 1/1 1/> ’TI“0 mm -on mm m -4 Zz >> IMIH |-4l-4t-4 1-4 -4-4-4>-C 30 O cz > r*r“ZZ O r~ H-t •o-onon O ¥ m O Oo •>4^^00 •4 o O M(DM>^9«M ►-•— 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 MMMMM M M M CD CD (D CD CD f M CD ooooo ¥CD m ooooo m •M Dl 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 mmenMO cn M o CDOMCDDI CD M D) OCDCDCDCO 9-CD CD 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CDCDCD^)—CD )— CJ M H- M m M M m o V) » » » » » » MMMMM MMMMM CJ CJOJCJ LJ C jJCJC a >GJ CJ <0C0(0(D(D MM MM CJM MM CJCJ » » » » » MMM MMM CJCJCJ MMM Ml CJCJ cno*ui » » » » » i» M M CJ M CJ ooooo O O ooo O 09 09 09 09 00 OO OO oooo 00 09 VsV,V.^Vs'V*\ OOOOO OO ooo O D) O) D) D) O)0)0)O) cn o)O) '^Vs V.Vs'V.Vs CD CD CO CD CO CD CD CD CD CO CD MMMMM MM MMM M ^-^M M OCJ CJCJOJCJ 05 ^-4 ^>1(o OO OO OO cn o) ooooo zzzzz cy o o o o -n-n-nmmooooo aoooo 9OZ9D»30 >>>>>OOOOO ooooo ooooo I i I U> CJGJMM M MMU3CJ MMMMM I I I I • MMtOMM <D ^<0040 I I I I I M MMCnM MMM^M » » » I O:x CO •^M^ M m m m 60M coMcn M MO e»MOcj oocncnoomoot/)C a )CJ oo <D m Mooo oooo oooo m (/) 30 30n -D -O cc CCC4 mmm>>>>-4-4C nuTizz -4-4 ►4MZ >>>-4-1 mm r" nm KC94 94 90 30 30 n3o 03 091/1 i-4Mm f-r-z ►41-4 CD (/)o 1-4-o l-l o oo 8S » » I o (/) » » » Io 00 Io CO m O o > OO r-r-r-r- >-4 1-4 -4-4 S8S m -<-<•-4IHI-I O CD in C/1 c < OO m m -n-n 1 1 1 O o f-r-1/1 in CD -n O QO ccc z 2Z »-4 1-41-4 Z OO -4-4-4mmm z r-r“o >>CD ID CD »-4ooo-4 mm ooo f-4 m Z omc/)o 3Q M O >-4 '4 O o > Ml—tDMfr-o t 1 1 1 1 1 o ►- )- H-M o (DID mm M M cr mM OOCD M 2 CD M OOCD o —4 1 t 1 1 1 1 m^-ooo M Z MM ooo M o COCO ooo ID • 1 1 1 1 1 1 CD ID ooo M ►4 ooo M z < zm c/> </5 > O m o 40 M o 1-4 O"n O 3D O mo PC zm o •■4 </) m 3D I1 i! tj 4 1 « o I 0 1 <D M -D >om 'fe- ^S. fe;'mmi:KW' i' W M? ',f'' m.. % .-: K)ISJ CJ U1 o> U1 »» » » » » fs> M M M IS) M rsj rs) ro M ISJ fsj N> N> K> ro fsj IS) ISJ IS) M N) ISJ IS) NJ rs) IS) Ki rs) IS) IS) rs) tiTtiJtrLSt^MiJmtiJmfc) Wt<J w vnuitnuiwni/iifujiiiii/iuiuiu^cncnin 0)90)0>0l0l0l0l0)0ici90)0l<xi0l M M K) IS) IS) N) IS) fS) K) IS) IS) IS) rsj IS) IS) IS) o O) CD rsj «D CD CD •D CD ►H I U)fs) iD c IS) I K) ocoooooooooooooo Ctt «• 0» CO 09 OJ 00 M 00 et 00 00 Od 00 c» CO oooooooooooooooo O) O) Oi 0) O) €0 O) CD D) 00 D) OO 0> O) 0) 00 CDCDCDCDCOCDCDCDCOCOOJfOCDCOCOCOrs)is>N)isifs)N)rs>fs>is)rs>fs>is>rsjrs)i\)Kj lS)U«h^ OOH* M JO <a)ISIIS)O00H» €©►- I- N) rOOOCJOOOO^K) JO'^OCJCJ MCn) *^<ooo M 00 ^ ISJ O CJ O 00 O O 0-M Ca) IS) <<4 o CD CD U) (a) JO Ca) CJ OI 0» Ca) ut Jb ^ c/10 O ^ CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD (D CD CD CD CD CD (D CD •D *P “D "D *D tl “O "D-O D “D ^ "D "D-D ^ 1^1.^ mm 04 om-« 04 0-1M M M M M M04 04 M M 04 M 04 04 M M 04 04 04 04 O4MO4 04MMO4MO4MMMMMMM iri DID! rn di di rn dii^ i^ di rn n di CD CD CD (D CD V> CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD %4^«.4«j-^«n4MMOOOOOCJOO ^Ck)CJtJU>MK>fS)0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0- I I I I I I I I I I I I c I I I OJ Cl) Ca) Ca) IS) Ca) Ca) K) Ca) Ca) Ca) CaI <a) IS) K) IS) ISJ K) IS) IS) Ca) IJ fs) Ca) IS) fSJ K) M ISJ Ca) Ca) Ca) I I I I I t I I 1 a I I I I I 1 CD m ill U1 CD Ul Ul Ul N) ISJ 0« O O K) IS) 0« CO Dl OI Of OIJO ^ Jo CD » M CO CD CD fs) O CD CD CD CD CD CD CD O CD CD CO CDO CD CD I I I I I I I I t I I I I • I t CO CD CO CD ID CD CO CD CO JO CaI 0« O-OI ^ Cil Ca) IS) IS) fs) fsj M 0-* M O-OJ M O-IS) 0- w » » I O ilX CD O CD oo OO o OOOCj OO o» oo oo oo 00 00 00 00 09 00 00 Vw-S,\ oo oo o OOOO oo 0)0)oo>CD CD CO 0> C71 0) 0) V.'N. CD (0 CO CO CO CD CD CD CD CO CD fOlSJ IS) ISJ N)IS)tS)N>fSJ ISJ ISJ <aJ ISJ fSJCDCD >— 1-^ COMOO rsjFsi ISJM M ^CaJM OO0)M oooirsj 0> *4sa) ^ CO CHMCaJ Ofooo (O KJO)CD CD 00)00 WOO ocncD Ca)IS)^-o M CD oo 00 U10) JaIS)CaI ooo »»»» XX oo X xxxx XX ►4M mm X l-n-4 1-41-4 -D-O XX r- r~XXXX mm XX r-m CD xxxx CD CD m m m m m oo mm o o o o OO QQ >>m ^ ^ ^ 2)*XX XX m cD CD CD CD << XX OO M nooo QO XX •H OOOO mm mm XX > ‘D oo CD OO X •DT)-4 -4 >O C O cz >>mm c -4-4-4-H oo 1--------o K4I-4^<II-4 mm mm m mm m X30 D-D 1-4 #4 1-4 M 1-4 CD CD XX X -4 W -4 -4 OO mm CD M N4 M »-4m m m m CD CD CD CD oomm QQmm » I o X CD » » I o X CD » » » f o X (D » » Io X CD m n » I O X CD O ♦ o -Hm c §s M -♦m X om CDo M “H Mo oo OO O w WOO OO > MM M M M CO ISJ MM MM o t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 o ^o CO CaJ Ca) U)M CD CD CO CO IS) ISJ Cl K)IS)fs)fsj CD fofsjrofs)CD CD X oo oo fsj ISJNJ 1 1 1 1 1 1111 1 1 rsjM IS)M M CD C/lMO MM X ^fsJ JhNJ IS)0> JOfsJCD O CD CO CD CD CD CO CO CO CD CD CO » « 1 1 1 1 lilt 1 1 ^ CaJ 4^ U)CO CD CD (DM 4k CD M K) M fsJM M M M M W MM X < Xm CD CD > Om -c O 3D OXo mo m O 04 CD 00 o I 0 1 ffsj Om •• ;.^71IS)K)»fsJIsj m M »M M MM M IS)»M ■ -mfDMnMIS)»IS)» ro ISJ ISJ IS)J»MISJ o o CD i CD CD m CD CD o CD »CD CD CD CD »CD CD »X CD 1»UU/1 »»Ds ^ ^ Jk o »m fs)* -j »OO »CD CO »CD CD CO CD CO 09 00 o o »OO »OO oo o CD »OOOO U1U1 » z O M i 1 -fi I. " om z -nOm oo ZzcmO ’ Y'' ■ z r-mm zz Z >zoz So o zm M MV. -<-<>Z fr Z ZHZ z m tV ' .om z z O z 1^. ■>sm C Q O o c>-4 z m C Sir-r~ o M Q > r- '■ IMIS» MN) UlCJ oo fsj CJ •vj CO CO » » m » m m roMKj ISJ fSHSJ COCO CO O)0IO> 0)010) CO CD CD » «> » » » rofo fsjfsj COCO 0» (7) 0)0) rofo » » m m » N> K) CO o> tn oo c/iui^roro oi^c^ K>ta COI— ^ OO) J»00 CON)cncoc/1 oomO menoomcA» oo co^coo eoOCftDk 0)00) ooo I cam -H-C mm OO mmapao mm m -4m <m zm iC MMI-4 •4-4-C isirsiM mmmm OO non S3 •-hh ao O 1-^ Om QO Oao M r- r- “n •-C O > ►H O § W m » » » rsj N) CO o> N> •>4 K)N)N)rorON)N)NJ N) N)fON)N>N)N)N> COCOCOCOCOCOCOCO O) 0)0) O) fli 09 O) O) N)N)hJN>N)IS>fON) » » 1» » m » N) N) CO cn CD *0 M N> CO cn oo N) m o OO O OOO oo O o »00 09Z 09 00 oo oo vv V V w w V V oo o ooo oo o O 0909 O)O) 09 (99 0)0)O)O) w V vw vv V CD CD CD CO CO CD CD CD CD CD MM M MMM MM M M OOOOOOOO eoweooooioooooo O oo O oo O > OOOOOOOO O) O) O) O) 01 O) 09 O) o O) oo> CO CD CD CD CP CD CD CD N)N)N)N)fOrON)fO CD N) CD N) N> ►- s►- c 9 « o cocjM^^camcDCJ men o CDCJ men ^cncjuifomoJk^MM V CJ C a )0900CDCJJkJklV>^0 09 00 0)0)CD MM MM omoocjoioMCj 0)0 w CD OO OO mm omjooooooo ►-» ►-o )»»»»»» "O mmmmmmm OOOOOOOO "0c CO m •< oonooooo <m Ul % OOOOOOOO oSoooooo OOOOOOOO m mm m m m mm m 2 "O -<r*m O O ao ao m cn CO o o o o o o o o zzzzzzzzc/)(/ic/)(/>cnc/)co</) TJ mac >m >om -4m fO 0 1 o» Om cno -T» -4 ►HI oz CD CD N) O ►H o O z O i o X mi oz m O l-H cn m Z' oo o ooo w o o Vvoooooo o o > MM M MMM D» C9 M M CJMMMM9-MM M M o • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 o uu 19 49 M 49 o CUM CJ MMM woo M CJ ^h «mmmmmob O CJ c CUM M MM oo M M enmmmencncnv CJ 00 z oo CJ OOO MM o M mmmmmmmm M M -4 1 1 •1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 • 1 C 1 1 1 1 MM o MMM men M M enmMMMOOO o M z MM CD VMM ID CD M M 0)pk49 VM09CJO o V o CD CD CD ^coco MM CD (D 4DCDZD9CDCDCPO o Dk • 1 •1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 • 1 1 1 1 CJCJ M CJCJCJ CD CD CJ CJ cdid ^cjcjmmo o CJ M MM CJ MM J9 M MMMCJMCnMO o CJ z < B m o 09z1 •Mo0 1 CD w ^J zm Z cn > »m o B »B B m cn o »»»»B B B m >m »»»»»B »o 1 ••1 1 J 1 •m o O O o o o o O PC z z PC PC pc PC cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn V V- 00 00 cnui N)N> N) ro <ON) O) cn -^00 ^(a> CaIUIOO 471471CO ►—rocjjcofo o>M005i/iu3cna>SOT901♦ • U1U1 « m CJCJ 00 00 .19.190k»OO> H*OJOO -^K>0>h-* (D(0 cncouicn-^^tOLH ’^OU)'^'^ tnocncno^^Oi>’^>^tn^*^^ oo oo >»»»»>9 9 ...............................- » ■ -»m » » U)OOH< >CJ CD O *n “n “Ti-n-n-H ccccccc ? oSSoooo ^ N> rsj O »mm VI z■"88 -HCC o a oap-^oc o 1-4 9 f-m Ofz< I/I Ml ■n-n » » » Ioz C/l MM U> tJ O 0 01 QD fSI M CD *^4 isj oo o K) ro o)CD CD tJ U1 ^ #feO00H- OCJ KIM o 00 OIMOOK» JbOCI OIOO o fSJ 1/10) <^4 <-4 coo CO Ol O)o »m 9 >o 1-4 (/> V?o OC/)C CO 9 0 > Of>►—mm Z f c-t 9Z z Timm -ozm c 99 C 9 > O 09m>fooo M9 o 9 $ Oo m oz Q > O9 M -Hm Om tnoro M M O - sO iD O M -4 •< S m o mo M I/I o > O 1 oo CD €Z 1/1 Z Ol -4 1 O Z O o CD • 1 ►—1-4 1/1 3g <« Hi o oo • .M O o 0 1 «l .9 Kl 9 C/l > C/l Cj >m om i i m ^ ^.. . 1 . . . ,, . 4 M"’ 3='io OOOOOOOOOOO IOU>(D<OCO<Otf>tfMO(OU> O OOOOOOOOOOO OOOCIOOOIOOOO OOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOO <o ISJ lOOCOOOIDtfMDtfMDCO ISjrsjlSMS>N»K>MK)K>foro O r>ja ^^CIO^O^UIW^MISJ OJ^K>M^cn^O«^a»i^a> OOtOO»OKI^^ tkOSOOO •nr% COm m-n -n m m 0 ►- 1 ou» 0 1o O 0 1oo X > c > (/)C/M/>(/)C/»(/)C/IC/>(/)(/)(/) ‘Ti*T^-n-n"nTTTi’T^-n-n-n noooooonono O O) O O OI Ol O O) Ot Oi OI roN»K>fOKiKINIKl Mfsi ^<*4^00000000 I I I I I f • I I I I rOMNIKIMlSiK4lS)K>ISjrs) • I I I I I I •• I I i#IUfUIMrO^^^K«00 OOI^O«bW*4^^<IIU>0 <o fo o o ui o <o 1 I I I I I I • I I I (D <0 <0 O Ul U U»U)M ^ Xo <£> o LH •—o CD N) Xm o i: > </» CD > O I K) Kl rsi 0 1oo 0 1oo ooo CO CD CO OOO »» » m » » Xo CO oooooooonooo (OCDCOCDCDCDCDCOCOCOCDCD OOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOO ooo ^ ^ o OOOOOOOOOOOO ooo OOOOOOOOOOOO CO CO CO M N)fS> CO N> COCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCDCO K)MNJK»MNJNJKjfsjN)fsJM • sXoXommOCO % to CO w CO CO X COoo»o o m rsi CD CO m CO CD oCD09•d tn X O X -1o-< Oo .*>. .5 O o o o *>4 -4 omSB ►—•—►-oOoooZ \V*oCOCOCOCO M M N>fsj Ul tJ ^ I— <*4 V/l ►- I-* CJ NIKI “4 mo9 doeofsi ^^^CJNlOCJd 00 00 uuo roKi Old co^sidco •s|*s|coooM^*^cnoo^^uidcocj coco U1CO cnv/1 in 1/1 • • 00 • • • • ►- K) 09 H- • ••• • ••# 0900 9 dCJd^-^CDddCD^COdNI com 0000 • 0 ►-I— 0 • 00 00 dtoOO 00 00 ddtn‘>*4^joouioKJeoo^co i/itn 00 00 CJtJ 00 »»9 »m m m » c 'TJ 01 </l(/)01(/>0101(/901C/)C/ICO(/) Q U cccni XXX >>>>>>>>>>>> 09C90DOOXX010D0DCD0D QB CD O C -<o •< M > O 'D 0 01 0)0>C7>C7>OOC7)0>0l0>d0l I I I I I I I I I I I I ni rnni >>> O O o PI rn m >om *n“n'n"n'n“nT|-n“n-ii-?i-ii OOOOOOOOOOOO m X *Dm m •n O n 01 m iiS 01m C PI ?e > -Hm -nmm ^*400 tJ ►- Mi I I I UCJCJ 00 OO 09 I CJ M -*4'*4-4000000000 I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I tn^O d *«J d CD ^ CD I I I CD U) ►- fo Ck>tn I 0 OJ CO 1 f^N>IN4MMK9KIK>Mr^MM I I I • I f I I I I I I uu/)drjM^H«H»^000 (Od^co^oo‘*4^h«dCJM 0 CO CO O CO in ^ ui ^<D CD o 1 I I I I I I I I I f I cococod^cjcjcjcj^^i*^ u)rj>-^-KiLncji-*H»vnfO>-* mmuui i m ccccccccccc >>>>>>>>>>> ccc >>> 9 9 9 Io X CO c > cccccccccccc >>>>>>>>>>>> oo SB Hm X m COo o ni O X ni Q ►H CO "• *S '*■*.'* 0 0 0 > ►—CO I—►—0 1 1 1 1 n *-*0 CJ CJ CJ c 00 CO 00 00 X IS4 H*CJ CJ -4 1 1 1 1 0 0 fsj KJ X M 0 Jo 0 0 0 CO CO 9 1 1 1 1 •—0 Jo 1-4 •—0 K»Kl 5 J iJ 0 01 d .CJ 0 0 .1 CO •Kl Xm “O to > X X 9 X X d 0 >>9 S 5 >m Z z 9 z z 0 C c 1 c c m >>0 >> r~SC r*r- CO *— P r- r '^1 --’T vilisf"’'■m-f<#l. -Vf'v*•*\ f ^ ii/-?'li-vms- /» L c,c tenfm ifi.-.'.'-' ■ - ov*-m COUNCIL MEETING AUG 1 0 1992 tWf Of 0R0r40 > <• te-"‘' hi W-y i ■. :’. I•5r'^.:-.- ■''■'.‘itfit. .:• »' . ip. Kl. is. • .*,/. '■ . , •> §i;-. pi Oi^^' -■i^-rv. Xn-T » - •• . V ^::*>: E»'ilsr -.^I'V Saturday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Saturday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Friday • - ■* 7-28-92 Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 17 A73-7033 C OlYOf ORONO @(£[10^ L.M.C.D. MEETING SCHEDULE August 1992 JUL 2 8 1892 Public Officials' Lake Tour Arrive 10:45 am for 11:00 am departure Return 2:00 pm Lafayette Club dock Environment Committee 8:30 am, Wayzata City Hall, 600 Rice St, Wayzata Standards Subcommittee, Lake Access Task Force 7:30 pm, #135 Norwest Bank Building, Wayzata Water Structures Subcommittee on Nonrestricted Watercraft and Off-Lake Storage 8:00 am, LMCD office, Wayzata Water Structures Committee 7:30 am, #135 Norwest Bank Building, Wayzata Lake Use and Recreation Committee 4:30 pm, #135 Norwest Bank Building, Wayzata Technical Review Committee 8:00 am, #135 Norwest Bank Building, Wayzata LMCD Board of Directors' Regular Meeting 7:30 pm. Tonka Bay City Hall Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force 8:30 am, #135 Norwest Bank Building, Wayzata pte-WiiC V v - p P?r m. s? fc;*v s. . :•• ‘ - Sat Sun 2 Wed 5 Thu 6 Sat 8 Sun 9 Wed 12 Thu Pri Sat 13 14 15 Sun 16 . i. - Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 10:00 am 10:00 am 11:00 am 2:00 pm 10:00 am 1:30 pm 6:00 pm 6:00 pm 10:00 am 10:00 am 10:30 am 2:00 pm 2:30 pm 10:00 am 10:30 am 1:30 pm 6:00 pm 6:00 pm 6:15 pm 6:30 pm 10:00 am 10:00 am 11:00 am 2:00 pm 2:00 pm 473-7033 EVENTS SCHEDOLE 6:00 am to 3 pm 10:00 am 10:30 am 1:30 pm August 1992 MYC Main WYC Wayzata SYC Big Island MYC Main MYC Main WYC Main MYC Main Wed Evening Bass Tournaments, Goose Is 6:15 pm WYC Main MYC Main WYC Wayzata UMYC East MYC Main UMYC East MYC Main UMYC East WYC Main MYC Main Wed Evening Bass Tournaments, Goose Is WYC Main UMYC West WYC Wayzata MYC Main SYC Big Is MYC Main UMYC West Westonka MDA Bass Tourney, Excelsior Park Tavern MYC Main UMYC East WYC Main (cont inu,.d ) T~’'V4 fr 1:i' p--"' m^. m ftss^f ,-‘:;V'’. •• ^'V^•?;^■■V tv '*[ *. ■ m- m h- m iK#' ‘ 'IvS- m: V.■ ,'V’i- ' P- ■■ % '. ' c • ■>> ’ M-'-' ' -I .•■?. I ■•;l''j.;i vvV;A^ Lake Minnetonka Conservation District August 1992 Events Schedule ** Page 2 Thu 20 6115 pin WYC Wayzata Sat 22 10>00 am WYC Main 2>00 pm MYC Main 2>00 pm UMYC East Sun 23 10:00 am MYC Main 10:30 am UMYC East 11:00 am SYC Big Is 1:30 pm WYC Main Thu 27 6:15 pm WYC Wayzata Sat 29 10:00 am MYC and UMYC Burton Cup Course 10:30 am WYC Burton Cup Course Sun 30 10:00 am MYC Main 10:30 am UMYC East (make-up) 1:30 pm WYC Main 7*28-92 . .•*.■?/ K4‘r » V. .w ’ tfiifStiii itf :^ii r: W-M LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Action Report:Lake Use and Recreation Committee N ' ^ ■ > Meeting:4:30 p.m., Monday, July 20, 1992 Norwest Bank, Wayzata, Community Room Members Present: Bert Foster, Chair. Deephaven: James Grath- wol. Excelsior; William Johnstone. Minnetonka: Thomas Reese, Mound; Tom Penn, Tonka Bay. Also Present: Set. Wm. Chandler, Sheriff’s Water Patrol; Eugene Strommen, Executive Director. 1. Invitation Nan Woodburn, Deephaven, invited the members to attend an event on Tuesday, July 28, 1992 at the Lafayette Club. The purpose is to raise funds for the Minnesota Transportation Museum for restoration of the Streetcar Steamboat MINNEHAHA. Woodburn said they plan to have the boat ready to float in 1996. Reserva tions can be made by calling Robert Woodburn at 474-4594. 2. Request for Slow Buoys in llalsted’s Bay near the King’s Point Ao C G s s• Edward Hentges, 3399 Kings Point Road, submitted a petition signed by residents of the Halsted’s Bay King’s Point Road area requesting that an area of Halsted’s Bay be declared a Quiet Waters Area”. Hentges distributed a sketch showing a small bay at the King’s Point access which they would like to have marked. Hentges said they are experiencing shore erosion, and they believe the lotus beds are being disturbed. This is also a breed ing area for ducks and geese, and boats leaving the access are noisy. , . ... . . DISCUSSION: It was noted the subject area is already indicated as a no wake area on the Hennepin County map. There are no "slow” buoys. r- j 1 •Penn asked if there are established guidelines for declaring quiet waters. Foster said it is a difficult balance to attain. He added the first 150’ from shore are quiet water by law. The executive director merit ior.ed three things have been taken into consideration. Carson’s Bay,for example, is a quiet water area because the area is surrounded with residences near the access. Excelsior Bay is a quiet water area because of the density of use. Channels are quiet water areas due to their restricted width. Penn wondered if all areas near access should be quie waters. He suggested establishing criteria for designating quiet wa t e r s•Hentges said not all of the residents signed the petition but there were no objections to the petition. ^ Grathwol thanked Mr. Hentges for his interest. Committee members are asked to view the area. . , MOTION: Grathwol moved, Reese seconded, to refer the matter to the staff to seek comments from the DNR. The item is to be placed on the next committee agenda. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. m’" '■ n - I? rfv%- $0.- if' WWi•a LAKE USE AND RECREATION COMMITTEE July 20, 1992 3. Special Event License - Fireworks The cominittee received an application from John M. Morrison, 2550 Cedar Ridge Road, Wayzata, for a Special Event License for a fireworks display on Saturday. September 26. 1992 as a part of wedding. Tlje fireworks would be discharfeed from a barge in Wayzata Bay. This is a time of the year when there is usually light boat traffic. The fireworks will be operated by Americana Fireworks, a professional organization with which the LMCD is familiar, • • ••iJan eraser, representing Morrison, said the display viii last about 15 minutes. She said the fireworks are to be a sur prise for the guests. Chandler said the Water Patrol is not excited about fire- works displays but he does not see any reason to deny the re quest. Johnstone asked if typically the LMCD approves fireworks for private parties. The executive director explained this has been in the past. There are not many requests, usually one perdone ir year. MOTION: Special Grathwol moved, Reese seconded, to recommend granting a Event License to John M. Morrison, 2550 Cedar Ridge Road. Wayzata, for a fireworks display on September 26. 1992. subject to the stipulations prepared by staff, noting the marker buoys must be placed by 5 p.m. and removed after boat traffic leaves the bay. VOTE: Motion carried, Johnstone voting nay. 4. Noise and Air Pollution tee Bay Dick Rank. 409 Lake Street Excelsior, addressed the commit- on the subject of noise and air pollution in the Excelsior area. Air Pollution - Rank said he is a resident of the Bayshore Apartments, adjacent to the City of Excelsior charter boat docks. He said in the past two years he has noted an increase in air pollution OH the Bay and in downtown Excelsior. The major source of pollution is the docked cruise boats leaving their engines running. He suggested all charter boats be required to turn off their engines when they get to the dock. Noise Pollution - Rank said he also notes an increase in boats without mufflers or inadequate mufflers. The boats leaving the Excelsior Park Tavern at night seem to "roar" away, and this makes it difficult for him to sleep. . Chandler responded that the Water Patrol has increased their decibel testing this year. The time of the night mentioned by Rank is a busy time for the Water Patrol as they are concentrat ing on speeders and Boating While Intoxicated incidents. Chan dler said they are finding that many of the boats stopped for a decibel test are meeting the state standard though the deputies may feel they are loud at of 82 t ha t d e c i Ij e 1 s level even H>: .r. .. ,• ■mr : .If-'-m^P^'%;n-‘';tf-%? fe-te-;m-- ►'-•. rs ►W.‘, fe. ?" 'r “i; r/ . ; iv-PS'. %[mH -i :-Wr’r-^, r>* V - LAKE USE AND RECREATION COMMITTEE Ji^ly 20, 1992 Foster noted that Minnesota has the lowest decibel rating* at 82 decibels, in the nation. He added that the LMCD was able to have the personal watercraft decibel rating for new machines lowered to 79 starting in 1992. Penn said he would like to investigate whether the I ‘CD could lower the boat rating to less than 82 decibels. Chandler said it is difficult to make one lake more strict than the others in the state. K3 informed Rank that he can call 9-1-1 or 525-62 16 when he experiences the noise problem. They will respond promptly if they are available. a notice of the noise complaint at is too loud, this is something the Chandler will immediately post Water Patrol headquarters. Penn said if 82 decibels committee should be studying. Grathwol returned to the subject of air pollution no^ting the exhausts from the boats are pointed directly at Ranks s resi dence, Bayshore Apartments. Rank said he has talked to the captains of the charter boats about engines running but did not get any satisfaction. Foster wondered if there would be relief if the City of Excelsior extended the dock out further. Reese suggested having hook-ups at the docks so the engines could be turned off. Penn said he would be opposed to extending the docks. He feels the engines could be turned off while docked. MOTION Reese moved, Penn seconded, to have staff investigate the possibility of having charter boats shut off their engines while docked and contact the City of Excelsior advising them of the discuss ion. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. Jim Sechser, Excelsior Gables Condominiums, Excelsior, said he also had unpleasant experier ces with both the sound and fumes while visiting Rank’s residence, Sechser also expressed a need for speed and wake controls in the area between Huntington Point and Recreation Point between Big Island and Minnetonka Beach. He was critical of a Water Patrol boat speeding in that area, ap pearing to be on a "joy ride". Sechser asked how many tickets have been issued for viola tion of the noise level. Chandler responded that their statisti cal reporting does not include that breakdown on a current basis, onlv in year-end summaries. ■ Johnston asked if there is anything in the Management Plan calling for changes in the code regarding noise. The executive director responded that there is not a specific objective. The Management Plan does have an over-all Lake use policy P.32, which addresses speed limits, quiet water areas and buffer zones. MOTION: Penn moved, Johnstone seconded, to have staff outline and plan to change the LMCD code for all watercraft from 82 decibels to 79 decibels and to study the fine structure and possibility of a mandatory court appearance when a noise citation is issued. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. •*y: €m ‘3 ;!.'>-■ _■ . > V * it -. LAKE USE AND RECREATION COMMITTEE July 20, 1992 5. Special Events - Deposit Refunds MOTION: Foster moved, Grathwol seconded, to recommend approval of Special Event deposit refunds of $100 each to the following, all stipulations having been met: A. Jimmy Rodgers Celebrity Fishing Tournament. 6/9/92. event was canceled. B. Minnetonka Crossing, 1992 Windsurfing event. 6/13/92 C. Minnesolar ’92. Solar Boat Regatta, 6/20/92 D. Mound City Days, W'ater Ski Show & Fireworks Display, 6/21/92 E. IN Bass Tournaments. Bass Fishing Toui'^iment. 6/28/92 VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. 6. Discussion: Minnesota Legislation Regulating Exotics and LMCD Special Event Procedures in Meeting tliat Law The executive director provided the committee wit. the response he sent to the Lake Minnetonka Lakeshore Owners Associa tion regarding the requirements for controlling the spread of harmful water exotic species. The memorandum waS sent in »e- sponse to a challenge from a LMLOA Board member concerning the LMCD procedures used in controlling exotics from entering the Lake during fishing contests. The executive director wanted the members to be aware of the memo and to be assured the LMCD is meeting the State law. Foster suggested studying, over the winter, the possibility of expanding the requirements to sailing regattas. 7. Water Patrol Report A. 7/3/92 Boating Sobriety Checkpoint Report Chandler reported on the boating sobriety checkpoint expe rience. The checkpoint was located at the Narrows channel with a full Lake saturation. Seventy-seven personnel participated from five agencies. Eight BWIs were issued Friday, the night of the checkpoint. One BWI was issued Saturday. One on Sunday, demon strating the impact. There were also some decibel tests. In addition to the BWIs there were boaters who had partial impair ment, which was brought to their attention. There are plans for more saturation patrols and perhaps one more checkpoint. The Water Patrol has receive inquiries from a number of states at a recent North Central Law Enforcement Conference regarding Lake Minnetonka laws and how they can do a similar operation. Chandler showed the committee the material which was handed to each boater along with made an explanation of why the stop was r'' > «’’;:p - •v\"* Tr'^”i Tyi ».7T7^-'*Sti?/ r*S'> *"* ^ % 'i:' > . mi !?•" .^ ' ^.v' "S: : ' " ■ [ W:v, ■ ^iri" 'ilJ -. "■!% i •*’V! '<: r:;:.yk ’( V ^r'u*^v^ »^' •, ..t..- ■•' > ■■ ■i '.■ '5:' ‘f: p-'* 'r'-f ..vViV .V. ■ :.t ■„* ■ LAKE USE AND RECREATION COMMITTEE July 20, 1992 B. Monthly Activity Report one ♦ There have been 37 BWls issued through 7/20/92, including by Orono police. Chandler listed 8 accidents in his written report The number of thefts have increased. Six stolen boats have been recovered * * * * The Water Patrol will share in the $13,000 funding for overtime from the DNR which will be released 7/24. Chandler showed a video tape of the checkpoint after the meeting. ope rat ion 8. Lights at the Narrows Channel Hennepin $1000 to near the t he The executive director reported Denis Bailey. County Lake Improvements, estimates it would cost $500 put red and green lights on the existing light poles Narrows channel. Northern States Power wi 1 1 not put up lights. The cost is based on Hennepin County doing the work. Foster encouraged having the lights installed. If needed some funding could come from the Save the Lake Fund. MOTION; Penn moved, Grathwol seconded, l"» obtain a more exact cost, including the cost of operation, for and green lights on the appropriate sides at VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. installation of red the Narrows channel. 9. Goals and Objectives The committee received a progress report on the committee s goals and objectives. Included was an advance progress report from Biocentric, Inc on the Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Study, The report w.t5 di -.ributed to the committee members will be reviewed at the next committee meeting. 10. Special Event Licensing Procedures that a I so Foster noted that there is a duplication of services in the LMCD issues special event permits and the Water Patrol issues permits. Foster suggests an inter-agency agreement be tween the LMCD and the Water Patrol giving the Water Patrol the permit rights for special events under the LMCD code and State 1 AW •Chandler said an arrangement such as Foster proposed would not change anything the Water Patrol is currently doing. Reese said he has reservations about the fishing contest permits. He foresees the time when fishing contests may be prohibited. There was no action. 11. Boat Parade There was a brief report by the executive director that the Celebrity Boat Parade held 7/10 attracted fewer than iOO boats. The short preparation time limited the response. There were no incidents during the parade. , ? IS’M’ 'i|j>i?--:.v>:KiM ■;: >r,- mm/^:$s' l«:te..-- fe'■ ^ W-" w |fev- ■ w- ^I’-' 0^: t <A ^»' tes?.-*- ■■ -k* •-v;m l':ft SI*- r '"'V> • ^1C:4'- -■^V. r .■ ■ Mi-- July 20, 1992LAKE USE AND RECREATION COMMITTEE 12. Adjournment Chair Foster declared the meeting adjourned at 6:10 p.m. FOR THE COMMITTEE: Eugene Strommen, Executive Director Bert Pc3ler, Chair -■i- - V J-.. K<i I A ■ -h ■? /; ■- i.'.;. /•'< / .1 •y I h :i f tr^ •• ■ ■•i'prm-'i‘"^M 1^: I'f?w & 3p'-!i, r^j ■','.H'- . U'y^-.SfSftV' ift.: 0y^:- fe’fe; ^-V |'-|«s- M: ‘?h.::' P#W' %<.. S|?K'‘ifif -■.'•••■ <rv. ife l»- |;*v • if To:Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse# City Administrator Jeaniie A. Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Administrator Date:August 6, 1992 Subjects City Facilities - Public Works Building At the recent budget workshop, a statement was made regarding the Building Department's delaying the progress of the Public Works building because of the need to install the p->ved floor before the building could be occupied. It is unfortunate that members of the City staff were still being advised by either the architect or representatives of Kraus-Anderson that this was even an option, since the structural design of the Butler building calls for first the pouring of the cement floor to sustain the primary support structure for the roof. The delay now appears to be that the roofing contractors have net returned to the site to complete the roof. This should be follo^-red up on. There is no question that the Building staff would have disputed any move into this type of structure if the building was completed and the floor not installed. The issues must be obvious to the Council: Potential ground contamination from motor vehicles stored and maintained in building. Potential liabilities to City and damage to structure because exhaust and heating systems would not have been installed (potential health hazard for occupants of building). Required plumbing would not have been available. As we now progress with the construction of the administrative complex, it may be helpful if members of the Council contact the department directly when questionable issues or similar concerns arise. Isv ’■''r i. ■j; k§'' " .£■ m- bp.: It’ »•;•■* . _ fv>.‘ . '. I* -:•1 ■rnyp: <»/P4 To:Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorser City Administrator Cv ''^7 /p Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Adm^istr^or v Date: Subject: 0 u 4 45 August 4, 1992 Technical Information - Styrofoam Flotation ~ Summary CounciImember Jabbour has received a wealth of information from Frederic G. Hunt PE, a Columbus Ohio marina consultant specializing in floating docks, and information from James E. Muschell with United Design Associates of Cheboygan, Michigan. The information sent to us was quite detailed, and includes not only various treatises on flotation materials, but includes suggested specifications and a list of credentials of both Mr. Bunt and UDA. The professional background of both of these consultants leads me to believe we have zeroed in on the recognized experts in the field of floating docks. I will attempt to summarize the technical information provided to us: A.Use of exposed polystyrene blocks for flotation is by no means the state of the art technology that it was three decades ago. B.Float protection technology and the selection of flotation alternatives has expanded to a point where use of unprotected polystyrene is beginning to be banned by the Corps of Engineers in many reservoirs under their jurisdiction. At some locations, USCE is requiring all existing exposed polystyrene flotation to be replaced within five years. Hunt notes the following current flotation choices and a few comments about each: 1.Wood. Has a given useful life prior to water absorption, decay, and ingestion by various marine orgaiiisms. 2.Air. Only as good as its encasement, which may be metal or plastic. With metal, good welds and adequate thickness are required to combat corrosion and require coatings. Plastic must be designed with the proper thickness and strength to resist collapse or stress-cracking. ^ty- •i • ?■. 4v^^ •l^v 'K'. ‘tJ M -?r'.. ; V- }h- ,.. nf!-V '<r,r '■:» '■ ..8;A ■’f*.rry‘^. rr. ’-V f .V .’v' T‘'\„ tr- k %,..iT ., I. [‘1 ^ ''^''-X ‘.4- ?.;■ ^ V>'( j* > ’•*'> I ’ -'(f •r •:*:.• ' ■' / .r-f."' v‘ ■, yrl’^;: &i : ■ :> ■r' - ^'V. Technical August 4, Page 2 Information - Styrofoam Flotation 1992 D. E. F. 3.Polyurethane. Requires precise manufacturing practices and must be encased in watertight containers if temperatures will be near or below freezing. Easily eroded if not carefully protected. If unprotected, high water absorption would lead to loss of buoyancy. 4.Extruded polystyrene ("Blueboard"). Normally used without encasement as it is not easily eroded by the normal deteriorating elements. 5.Expanded polystyrene ("Beadboard"). Absorbs some water. Easily eroded. Disintegrates when exposed to gasoline. The buoyancy characteristic of a given foam product is related to its affinity to absorb water over time. While quality of the individual beads may affect absorption, the greatest factor is the percentage of voids. Therefore, when specifying the foam product, one should not only call for a certain density, but for an upper limit on water absorption. Hunt provides a suggested set of minimum specifications for the quality of foam product and for the encasement of the fo2un, suggests that all flotation within 100* of a gas dispenser or supply line must be 100% impervious to water and gasoline, and require replacement of any floats when the foam is visible or particles of foam appear on the water. Muschell of United Design Associates provides a floating pier specification used by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources for state- owned/sponsored mooring facility projects. He notes that this specification requires enclosure of the polystyrene and pages 10, 13 and 14 deal specifically with the flotation units. This specification requires use of closed cell polystyrene cellular materials, either preformed or cemented in place. The flotation material must be fully encased in 20 gauge galvanized steel, 1/8 inch t..xck aluminum, 1/5 inch thick medium density polyethylene, 2 inch thick wood, or a combination of these materials. Detailed specifications are given for the grades of galvanized steel, aluminum, and polyethylene. Also, the specification on the closed cell polystyrene requires an average density of 1 pound per cubic foot and a buoyancy factor of 59 pounds per cubic foot. •J Afn.. Si?"'- m> ■ - ' ■ . m"' m te“-fe'- »Wm>r Technical Information - Styrofoam Flotation August 4, 1992 Page 3 H Isv Nuschell notes that although the specification provides of the foam so it is contained and nuouiiexx nwv.es unau aj.viiviu^ii apcv.xj.xv.cii.xwii pj.wvxvica for encasing of the foam so it is contained and disintegration is limited, this system doesn't require the encasement to be watertight. He believes that towards eventually requiring I waiWdB^111 w JA ^ u*w current thought is moving ^ watertightness, because of: Water absorption limiting the life of the floats.1, 2, 3, Exposure to animal penetration. Potential fuel degradation by contact. What does this all mean? I would draw the following conclusions from the information sent to us: 1, The technology for enclosed flotation units certainly exists, and such units potentially have a much longer service life than the relatively inexpensive unprotected styrofoam (which may justify the higher cost), 2, The Corps of Engineers is already starting to ban unprotected styrofoam, with a 5-year grace period. We are not alone. Both experts confirm that gasoline will rapidly degrade sytrofoam on contact and therefore, encasement and protection against gasoline contact should be provided We might want to consider incorporating Hunt's "Minimum Flotation Specification for States with Freeze/Thaw Temperature Cycles" as part of our styrofoam ordinance. The information from these two experts appears confirm and support the City's position that n encased styrofoeun should non- .1 A ,.A. . a. *1.1 ■ ■■ ''x.Jr'*. S . MMmm'Mm Frederic G. Hunt, RE. Marina ConsuUanl Specializing in Floating Docks W July-23, 1992 Mr. Gabriel Jabbour 985 Tonkawa Road Long Lake, HN 55356 p,.'.v.,rvA ■ i >«* Subject: Flotation Mr. Jabbour: 1 am enclosing four papers: Jr, 'i 'i%-< *■ M ■ ‘ *v» 1. A paper recently given thoroughly discussing all aspects of floats and flotation. 1: A as a Consultant in the last six years. 4. A recoimended specification. & m w • ^ ^ — —- - - — Your ptoblan ot doteriorating foam is now a familiar one and ta^l«Sficati«is everywhere. Most Corps of Engineers reservoirs and nvers have now banned exposed foam. Wx- W ■ •’V 'X T or Sell anv flotation product. I do independent research on foam and I write float specifications for clients to help get than ® 9°°^ . - fWr site aoecific situation. In your area the foam nee^ to be to prevent puncture of the shell and invasion of the foam by «iir"Sd^l^e’^olLe dissolves tJlZ tato foam at a slow rate. Erosive forces and annmls will tear the f!^ ^ apart and leave them floating on shorelines and beaches. -- - - -- - - - (;)“ • _ r *.ua aimnlier uho wants to paint over foam. Usually the paint will *■ the beads of fomn are then «.po»ed. _^ - .A ,CX;. . . , , f4«i*-ion is what I consider a ndniinum quality specification SScS‘^n1r*o5St“nU“oi of:^ L::^able but not outstanding quality. Respectfillly, •ederic O. Hunt, P.E. PGH/firh Attachnents I: '\T.< -i e'f t %■ ■ V*1790 M^rriweather Dr • Columhu.s. Ohio 43221-;327 • 614-J51-5113 1 i '•i 5 4 wrr^itvi'v h^’’i •» ■ ■f: V’V ■ ^ ^:i ■!*., tv:- hv - f'-- K*;;\?i W' V"fe- i'r ■ii>5'.-- f'-'. ' - . . ■- “iV ■ -. >.vj ‘'-.. ,'i-.- i *T‘ ;■ V*'.• i: v"'-' ■ V'--•As,. ■Vi ? -vt:L- s:!"" i‘ ' Frederic G. Hunt, P.E. Marina Consultant Specializing In Floating Docks 3RD NATIONAL FLOATING STRUCIDKES DESIGN (XNFEKQICE June 22-25, 1992 in San Diego, California for University of Wisconsin pirffATICH MATERIALS - TOEIR PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE structures. So let’s review what has been used, wnat is being used and how to design flotation for the life cycle of the designers choice. Hhm 1 first became involved with flotation in the 1960s flotation consisted SSly of”^nrgallon steel drums, and exposed polystyrene blocks. In the 1970s the steel druns installed in the 1960s were and sinking, and exposed foam flotation was eroding away, lISciS^uSLg in the middle 1970s advanc«j«nt in the develop^t ot iiTproved flotation had been made to protect the flotation natenals, a polystyrene, fron the effects of water absorption and erosion. Air became better "encased with total protection by h^vier stwl shells, both round and rectangular, plastic 55 gallon druns and plastic tubs. Polystyrene blocks were painted, coated, wrapped with fiterglas^ draped in t5^ in steel S aluninun, set in concrete and cover^ with w^. also being expanded into cylinders and tubs of steel, aluninun, polyethylene and other plastics. TWO part ndxe. of polyvirethan* *“»” bei®9for flotation and axtrudad polystyrene billets were becamng pop •Lr^’sr„ss:, HI s^iil e^pnent designed to control ndx quality and proportions. T’ fl^tiS’c?~S’£Sr« S^er^^rr^ltil ™'rps ot ^ jurisdiction requrrxn, all 1790 Merriweathcr Dr. • Columbus. Ohio 43221-1327 • 614-451-5113 v-« . mkit' fi*.- P e. ’ i:^ vr: ,r--' fe--p:< 'i--- •n I- fte Efe-. ^:v polystyrene to be coated or encapsulated. Sane requirements nay fjvoWe only the shoreline so it is »tici^ing r«tri^ons on Se of exposed polystyrene will be inposed on all bodies of water wit^ a few years, of the current problems in the C of E coating recrements is thU/the approval of a particular coating is at the ^scretion of ea^ reservoir manager. What nay be approved on one b^y of rater ray approved on the next one. Hopefully a toughness and longevity test for f^ protection will be developed in the near future for use by all specifiers and \]sers jathouoh I have been deeply involved in the design, nanuracrure ^ tol Lsr 25 years, it hjs be® ^ t^ l®t th^ years that I have intensified my research on flotaUon ferial s aM «naseM\ts Water absorption, foam densities, and encasements have ativlied with over 125 samples of foam tested and many encasements matured and is fdiscussi® of so^ of .sy test resu ts flotation dioices vdiioh will help guide the design of flotation in the X990s. wood as a flotation material is the oldest float material^ i^®^‘^i„'“«ter ^“northwest part of this country having a nv® sVwBAt-B«<ian decay and being eaten by various marine organisms. If its lx*.e spanks cotpatible with the floating dock design life, then the wood ray mee the p jject requirements. Air is still a good flotation material but is only as good as its ^tal encasonents are at the mercy of good welds ^ by to cenbat corrosion. Both welds and the metal need t ai«o coatings unless the metal is of significant tMctoess. thicknSs and usable encasements for air but must be designed with strength to resist collapse from ice, puncture, debris, or str^ flotation frJniraroDer comer radius and/or materials. Here again, this type f lota tim liTb^dSi^eS ™?aS^?Se Ufe of the floating dock structure with proper aiSlysis of^ter quality and its effect on the encasement material. p«lvurathane continues to be used by a few float manufacturers. This material Si^ pSi^rly Ltmulatrf ®d «p®ded with the use ^“y «Strolled t«*>eratur« so as to have ®ly a However, *d»® poured or injected with honoimde devi^ control, the material will usually have nrnny voi^. Hus type foam ruse always be protected as it will erode away very easily. was that when polyureth®e is <,y with tte repeated freeze polyurethane turns to slush ^ 1^® all <-3„%et into the and thaw cycles. This material should not oe usea it -Oe- i Ift:p i" ■ ' 'r I- L- % i. r I s'f- i ? '• E>c' ! " • ^ ' I . y' I- w% k I C #S’i W’’ife® • _ _. , . _r;r.aT-afnrr" will get near or below freezing. Anotherencasenient and totfieraturM wui 9 ^ ^ formulation of intorestin9 <^*"“<=^^2 tafconliderable shrinkage when exposed to water, polyurethane, without CFC s, naa ua^er to enter voids within the This action ^Id a ,l»rof“CScyInruJel^d'arryinrSiUty. The shaped encasements. oolvstvrene is asmufactured by enly one can>any with MtnisiOT 7“ or 10^’ ^gi Tand 20" or 24" wide. The inatsrial is blue, a^ 1 ®re 7 or iU , .«:a,w m-4-1* uater afasorDtlOd that has a SSsI’ty^of i«t“Sla:r2 ^te./~:n.."5^h Ce-ry mUe-water absorption. * S ^ “eilj eroded by the normal deteriorating elmnents. S?fr^ti« bj freeWt^ is tlr less than in polyurethane but not quite as good as expanded polystyrene. ihm pro^rly designed should last in the 30 to 40 year range. -3- fifV..-. C ‘ ■^;v hC h-V* vi •f if:- r 7 6 i' rii }'t:- ■• ' K’, *' 0'% p,.. -V ?< !« E* r\> iMimi To find out more about water absorption characteristics of £^, I s^ed over 125 sanples of iraterial fran dock iranufacturers and float s^pliers. I ^ inter^ in finding out how fast foam absorbed water. This toting ^rirf"“er ^™val fran a dock of a foam billet «^=h «ei,hed 16 lbs /cu ft. instead of the original 1 Ib./cu.ft. when installed ab^ ^iiS; ThiTincrease took place even though the dock was removed from the water f'^’’ five months each winter. A review of dock nanufactu-rer's flotation material specification lis^ claiJiB that their polystyrene foam would absorb oily 1% or 2% of water. Th test referred to in their literature was a ASTM test for insulating bo wSyta^Wropriate for flotation block testing. After nirerous trials ^ ^ti2nS“Tnnlized on a test, shown on age 5, which has been lateled tWHunt Absorption Test”, it is a good test to conpare relative ^o^cy «al is easy and inexpensive to perform. When makj^g <=“^«is^^c^rte oi past performance, the quality of the foam can be readily determined in as little as 15 minutes of testing. The seven day test results, as shown on page 6, demonstrate the rapid incr^e in absorption during the first seven days of exposure to water. Some 30 day results are shown on this page.One year and two year results are presented on page 7. So what did these i^esults tell us? "fliat foam absorbs water rapidly in the first hour, still at a good i^te for 30 days and then slowly thru the first and second, years. TSxese tests also showed that there are different qualities of foam. to interesting part of thxs testing program has been the satisfaction that when manvifacturers and suppliers asked to make foam with less water absorption, the itajority of them were able to inprove their foam and meet my and nuntierous other agencies requirements. j nil i-iiRiBii i li! 5!% ^smisiii Specifications referring to the ’*Hunt Absorption Test” lostially require the seven day absorption to be less than 3 Ibs./cu.ft. IWCftgASKSK. IW WE16HT • fYC.U. PT. 30 DAY RESULTS -4- ■'!.^'V''fe'x:- irr f\:X !'-' ; ^ J- V'-v ^-';- !-■'h'vt I..)**- 1^:'v $■ ►i‘ • t *V. ;■■; ■ ;4’ ) r.'-’ . 1* / \ If- U -• r ■W-. k\ f'- ?r Frederic G. Hunt, RE Marina Consultant Specializing In Floati.ig Dorks HUNT ABSORPTION TESr for POLYSTYREI^E AND POLYURF> lANE RELATIVE TO USE AS FLOATING DOCK ^I-OTATION FURFOSE: To get an early indication of the relrc-ve TEST PROCEDURE: 1. bency i. f foame. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Precisely prepare a 1/16 cii.ft. sanple. Size is . be 5.0" x 5.0" x 4.32". Cutting is to be by hot wire in a jig for polystyrene and sawing for urethane in order to give consistent dimensioning. Heigh the 1/16 cu.ft. specimen on an accurate scale which reads in either grams or one tenth ounces. Air dry the sanple and weigh daily until the weight has renained the same for three consecutive days. Fill a 5 quart bucket about 1/2 full of water and add . 1 coloring to the water Put the foam block into a container with 4.32" dimension vertical. Put r w^tght on the board on top of the container and fill the container to the top with additional water. Put a 1/2" thick spacer between the foam and the board so that the foam will be conpietely submerged with about 1/2 head of water over the top. Water will have to be added every few days due to evaporation. At designated time periods. 1 hour, daily for 7 days, weekly for a month and every month thereafter remove the foam and weigh it. Bring the foam r»ut of the water with one corner high and drain it for five seconds. Then place the foam on the scale, which will hold water runixing frcm the foam, and weigh. Subtract the original dry weight from the final weight for absorption. Multiply the difference in ounces by 16 to get the absorption for one cubic foot in oiaices. Then divide by 16 to get absorption in pounds per cubic foot. Return the specimen to the container and repeat with periodic weighing until a resulting absorption curve is established. Hhen the weight tests are conplete, cut cube open and note the pattern of the color-.I water which indicates where void areas occur. March 1991 1790 Merriweather Dr. • Co <mbus. Ohio 43221-1327 • 614-451-5113 •-J 1 t A Hi 5..*.r § ic whV-,.h.rf k. .j?; i- ■-? h- k' j & I?. iv. r* I « S'D- I'r Ik I..:fc; P<..^ w - OAY.S -6- § X P' r •k. -L- W£EK3 -I- YEAK M *» * ^ weeK5- t g YgAK aaasaaasEsssatsas <ggdaaitaactrgg IS 3 i « Sife H I I I 1^» C "k: • • 4 • I « n 1 : • « « * • • • • i 4 • ! i « 1^4^ * . : M » ♦ ; i • i » • » I » • ] I i ' ' ! 1 ! II - I . ■ i I 4 • « •ill* •■'■ i:iI ! • • » . *I . M I 1 i i i f 1 I I I :!!i • ! • ( : ♦ I I 1 I t : i 1°| i i n ••injii :ini>:LL.4 ' t j I f ♦ H r “* t • I 4 ».i • • t I * I « I \ ; i 1 I I ; . I I = ♦ I i* *t • I I * • I« :'i! ♦ • ^■v;: \ • I I I < nm-lttt t T ♦ • 4 ♦ t i -i..-::tl 41 ■ii u * ^ > • ♦ • 4 I H• *R 4la 4 4> 4l!l f I! ? 1 .1'n I«- ■Hfl!l;i • t M < I 4 • < t-t* ♦ * • ♦ I- ’li 4!l j i ! ii; 4 4 ' lu 4 . 1 rtli*:;fill. t * >ij 4. » i • 4 1 4 4 , - - . < • ♦ • 4 I I ' I • 1 JJill ■rt4 4—* f- J t 4 J » 4illi*. rUTCR-::I ^ : ;«i- -i .1 i , ^ I • ♦ ^r^f * ’ p: i.r 11:; I MJ-I X 1 4 » PC i4 -4 ‘ • 4 J_ t-i !?il: .1: Ii H-0: (-r :ii[irn t *0 i ^ * * M ! I !• Tfr=r^ T 1 -* ! ;iui im I •*I « I ; 1 u »i • ». 4 • t • 4 mint #rilrrF U ! : 1 I T4-»4 I • f iiltlJ-illi « 4^A• 4 * I . Mil;:-’U --i i ‘ • h- 1111 i 1114 »t i ;»: !!! U 1 .T1 ♦ I 4 J i I I I » * 1 • ; M 4,1. I •• ‘ 1 4 • 4 I 4. I 1 i i . • • I I I • ' « ! I { . • * I * • * . : I j • I • • 1 ! 1 ‘ 1 4 O 4 4 I I r Hiir Tift 1 t ••I ll* r‘i- 4 . I • 4 < )■ 4 I 1.41.4I I , . ^ U—. , I » . »4 • ■•-*’■4 4 ^4-i 4 • • ^ • 4-4 — • • ; 4 f -• t t • I 4 *• ^ 4 » -I 4 I ‘ ♦ O' • * * . I . • « • 14::.. 4 i. . i, •. - - ' I ■ i I 4 I • 4 4 I a • ■ i ■ I Ii •4 • i f 4 4 • • •t 4 4—i. ‘ f-i • • •• tX* . . • 4 I in'i-'U-: I • -•U.* • • • ; » •1!. i i * 1-. , L i 4 • ■ > * . . t . :!'••• .4.4 -4 • •• • * • I : T T ^* • I 4 4 • ». • ^ * • ^ • ,44.;;I.I. 4*41 « 4 4 . 4 4^4 . • . • I • 4 i • I • . □ - - » )C ► ■ • C3J p in ® > > < M ’I D r 1^ 5. >□00 i r »1 B iO - • ». 44 j-*-. . . 4t-IT, • ■ K • I • t » • I . *• I 1 III:: • . a •. *p 4 4 niM::* 1111 • 4»I i X 4 . . . • 4 1 • $ • 4 * • ‘ I • a I 4 4 4 4 I jrrrrrrrw o I • . • 4 4, f • • • 4 • • 4 • • » « . « 4 ^ 4 » I 4 4 I • • • I rMiLt-'j4j.l!«£..4- .. /‘aX. I I i#■? rr J 1 ■ • i 1 1 1 ;! 1 5 v! ,Vi J i.fe"fe.- [iws. f.f:-^<ty •f: •>? ■i.^j >y 'k' M «-Vr , ■■ ■».-ri. s,. Although 3 Ibs./cu.ft. absorption is obtainable with no add^ expense, hopefully continued efforts will allow the maximum absorption requireinents to be reduced even lower. In interpreting the test results it should be noted that the test is run in cemtrolled water conditions and there is no additional effect due to erosive deterioration by normal conditions such as wind blown waves, boat debris, current, ducks, fish, stone crabs, other sea creatures, muskraw, gasoline, boat hooks and miscellaneous other deteriorating forces all or which cause loss of foam beads and loss of flotation. Foam absorbs water in two ways. First is by the water filling the void space between the foam beads. Good foam has small voids, poor foam has large voim. If the be^ are poured in and not expanded there is about 40% voids. After the initial filling of the voids with water there is a very sl^ absorption of moisture into the outer shell of each individual the absorption test charts, most of the voids are filled within 30 days after that the beads slowly absorb water. All beads do not seem to aMorb moisture at the same rate so bead quality does have sane effect on absorption. DESIRED t ACTU frL te -8- KA' ■■ i ■■ Bead size varied in the test sanples frcm small to large to mixed. There was no indication that bead size had any relationship to rate of absorption. Bead density was once thought to effect absorption, with less absorption in higher density beads. This theory was not evident in tests as shown on the density chart on page 8. Although density may have an effect on absorption into the bead, it has no correlation to absorption between the beads. With exposed foam, the foam which absorbs the most water will be less solid and therefore subject to easier and quicker erosion and deterioration. Most polystyrene foam weighs around 1.0 Ib./cu.ft. but can vary upward and downward. To assure a solid enough mass of foam to backup coatings and coverings, a most cannon specification calls for polystyrene foam to have a mtniimn density of 0.9 Ibs./cu.ft. Specifying this density combined with a requirement of less than 3 Ibs./cu.ft. absor- -.ion at seven days, assures the buyer of getting a high quality polystyrene foam. Do not specify an average density of 1 Ib./cu.ft. because that can get you anything since there are no low limits. Always use minimum densities in the specifications. Polystyrene sanples were tested for effects of freeze/thaw cycles and no difference was found in absorption between sanples continually frozen and thawed and sanples that remained in water without being frozen. (Note: This was not the case with polyurethane.) polystyrene The depth of polystyrene block inmersicn into water affects initial absorption and longer term absorption as shown on the graph to the right. TWo sanples were cut side by side from a block and tested with 1/2” head and 9” head of water over the top of the sanples. Not only did the deeper sanple absorb more water imnediately but absorbed more water with time. Testing was done to see if foam absorbed water by capillary action. This question came up when people found wet and heavy foam above the vjaterline. Testing showed that foam does not take on water by capillary action. My explanation for wet foam above the waterline is the fact that when a liveload is applied to a dock with exposed fo«n, foam nonrally above the waterline goes under water and the voids are imnediately filled with water. Although these voids quickly fill with water, they do not let it out very fast in fact very slowly. This is confirmed by the -9- -'v■ ir I- 5;'.‘ [ I & i! rfv = f<J. t‘" k ”r >f-r.- -V V j;- I: ‘mm ■ I*!,*. * ■ P<- 'h Wv.tr- L-vv- i, 8,^' ■ • k r>‘. k’-' i- ^TS.;'.^"arrsS;.'3«“'‘SJ -^‘vrrlls get lower, for numeroias reasons, including water absorption in roam. If the project requirement is only for short life in a dock foam will probably do the job, unless the fo^ is or very poor qua / the foam will be attacked by waves, ai^ls, 15 vears existing exposed foam docks which have been in service more than ^5 Y^rs, ^ M law^as 25 years, but these are the exceptions and were probably with continuoxis flotation and with original lively capaci y m excess of the 30 Ibs./cu.ft. currently used in nany specifications. To achieve long life from polystyrene foam flotation, it nee^ to frcJ^liSve^orcL and Ster absorption. Testing has shown that once a coat jpg or cover protecting the foam is punctured, the enc^ar^ imMdiately filled with water which occupies all the exposed voids in th foam A coating or covering which is subject to puncture ^11 mee IS?«t CoSi of Engineers requirements and protect StIS bT^ animals and narine life. However, mce punctured wa^ aKvoroticn will take place. Wood, sheet metal, sheet alunimm, concrete, and ^^^op plastic tubs will also protect against erosion, animals, and marine life but not from water absorption. ■J.!S“-o.'S.S5S ".-“•SS., V;H ‘S3 -S site specific project to obtain the life cycle desired. The most popular a,..! prwen ^ tnhs'’'^'’S2e tuhs"^'*"cwr^ rinf «™tyTf"^P^ Here .pain it i. necessary to sp^fy ^11 observed to be as thin Sli°cl£^S*”hi ”ry1):crS^^ sl^es1?^«l%“ ice, tr iroving debris or to provide extra long life. hiil ^^hi^ fd^syst^i^ch should last 40 years, then specify a 40 year flotation product. 1 3B,^h\»ved bv using a water tight high density -10- p.'K;- -' ■ (i;--;^v M"«.. r f: W\ft*' *>■fe '• W"; ■’ 4' .».•5 .. 9 ^i\r i . >'•■ ■ l»^^ ... ^t?'-*’ -V.te-'G ‘t^. (* ;'A ■ P'3^- CCT^1*Sr puncturing. EVen if the polyethylene shell cracks or punctures the interior polystyrene foam will provide an anticipated additional 20 y^rs of life as long as the foam is protected by the shell from erosive action. The confcination of a quality polyethylene shell and low water absorbing foam imy add up to a 40 year life or possibly even longer. £NCA2>EMENT 20 YEAR5 ZO YEARS 40 YEARS In sufimry/ not only should the floating dock system structure be wisely selected, but flotation selected to be ccniatible with the life expectancy of the selected structure. -11- •i r?** . “ rtn'- 'iM\. fc"'i#-’I'E‘I.mit m' * P‘'..'» ISt' P'liv-K« J?7'v ' i Spi: WIt--r- #■ |i..It; mm •, v Vtrt- Ik fe-' "m IvS Vi' I:’ V . * *' W" ’ri. f‘,'* ■'■> : %'' ■ k^'l^r.-' -f ,■*« ::i'S ’•sCi ’ -S' . V ?-■■K? 'i-‘ >;*• ^ v.r Frederic G. Hunt, P.E. Marina Consultant Specializing In Floating Docks PROFESSIONAL BIOGRAPHY of FREDERIC G. HUNT, P.E. X. Current Positicgi Owner, Frederic G. Hunt, P.E., Marina Consultant, Specializing in Floating Docks II. Education A. Badielor of Civil Engineering, Ohio State University, 1951. B. Continuing Education Course.5 at Michigan State University, Ohio State University, University of Wisconsin, University of Pittsburgh, Clark Technical College, Atmco Steel Corporation, American Welding Society, A.S.C.E., United States Air Force and United McGill Corporation. Affiliations A. Registered Professional Engineer, State of O^o. B. Menber, National Society of Professional Engineers. C. Menber, International Marina Institute and member of their Marina Design Conndttee. D. Past President, Sheet Metal Contractors of Central Ohio. E. Menber and Past Conmodore, Leatherlips Yacht Club, Colianbus, Ohio. F. Vice Chainran, City of Upper Arlington Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. IV. Recent **Floatinq Dock” Presentations A. ”Flotation Materials-Their Past, Present & Future”, 3rd National Floating Structures Design Conference, University of Wisconsin at San Diego, California, June 1992. . „ , ^ i B. "Perfonnance Specificaticans for Floating pock Systents , 3rd National Floating Structures Design Confer«ice, University of Wisconsin at San Diego, California, June 1992. . i. C. **Flotation: Past-Present-Puture”, International Marina Institute, International Conference, December 1991, Orlando, i, D. ”Designing and Specifying Floating Dock Systems , 18th Natiral Docks and Marinas Conference, University of Wisconsin, October 1991. E ”Perfomance Specifications for Floating Dock Systems and Research Results on Foot Flotation”, Floating Structures Design Conference, University of Wisconsin, June 1991. P. "Water Absorbing Characteristics of Foam for Floating Do^te , International Marina Institute, National Conference, December 1990, Boston, Massachusetts. t-nn .. »u. > .• • t r. V- ^ ^ > i i>„ »V «r'^*4 ; fU. k*‘‘K;f k;-‘< J' i’r m 5i>»^,iS ■»•: ■ 1^ v:v^. ■W k-■• V.4 f: kV, , ‘"V K :.! 1.'. u^\..m ‘■:.-r -■- ri }.. I’-C .{'• iL-vr/y cV- > ’ "iMm ** Specifying Floating Dock Systems", 17th National Docks H Wisconsin, October 1990. "■ Systems and the Flotation That of ^^i" SSSe'l9^ * Structures Design Conference, University for Floating Dock Systems", 16th National 3 iS^oTfnH^ Of Wisconsin, October 1989. K ““versity of Wisconsin. October 1988. *■ iSl^ Systems", Marina Design and Marina Institute, Decenter Specifications of Floating Dock Systems". 14th National Dw^ and Mannas Conference, University of Wisconsin, October 1987 SrilS i"® Seminar, The InternatiialMarina Institute, June 1987, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. V. Ehplovinent and Work History A. Augfust 1, 1986 to Present: Owner, Frederic G. Hunt, P.E., Columbus, Specializing in "Floating Docks".Ohio, Marina Consultant, Providing services in the following; a. Site Select!^ and Dock Orientation. b. Dock Layout and Design. c Inspections and Inspector Training. d. Plans and Specifications for Floating Dock Systems. e. iMtnartion in Design and Specification Writing. ” Price vs. Life Expectancy and Maintenance Cost. g. ^iting of Contracts, Warranties, Payment Tente and Conditions of h. Writing of Maintenance, Operating and Winterization Instructions. 1. Legal Expert Witness. j. Stom Danage Assessment and Repair Estinates. k. Arbitration of Owner~Contractor Disputes. l. Submittal Review. m. Iiistallation Supervision and/or Inspection. n. Product Analysis. o. Condition and Life Expecta*icy Reports for Existing Marinas. B. 1962 to July 31, 1986 (date of early retirement): Cor^rate Vice President and General Manager, Systere Group, United M^ill Corporation, Columbus, Ohio at time of retirement, having been a Vice President since 1967. -2- ‘'•.A* te .. i '■■ ,j. fi' • isr I I fe I: PVr-tf'-fc l^v.a.'K"' -r fe.,M- i.... Highlights of 24 year career include: 1. Floating Dock Involvement a. In the middle 1960*s, was involved in the starting of f :ed Flotation Systems as a dock conponent manufacturer and siiortly thereafter became an engineered dock system maiiufacturing conpany. b. During those 20 years was in charge of United Flotation Systens. c. Developed, by myself, one of United's 4 basic dock designs and was deeply involved in the develo;jment of, and continued modifications of, the other 3 basic designs, with applications to well over 1000 projects. d. Respcnsible for the design of United’s Floating Breakwater which has been successful since the early 1970's. e. Worked 4 years on finding a Pontoon Shell for corrosive waters and first introduced that H.D.P.E. product in the mid 1970*s. f. Developed United's H.D.P.E. Pontoon Shell for which there was a Patent applied for. g. Prepared proposals for United and Private Investors for Corps of Eng'<ne«rs Marina Leases. h. Successfully obtained a Corps of Eiigineer Marina Lease for United McGill in 1972 at East Lynn Lake, West Virginia and then developed and managed that 280 boat operation for about 5 years. i. Have done damage assessment and insurance estimates for dock systems with damage from ice, wind, oil and runaway boats. j. Have made numerous presentations on dock systems to various groups ranging from public interest slide shows to 8 hour design seminars. k. Have written articles on various aspects of dock layout and design. l. Have written contracts, warranties, terms and conditions, mair. .enance and operating manuals and winterization procedures. Have written oper.. closed and restrictive bids specifications. Have layed out nunerous dock systems for most efficient use of water area. Have made valuations of existing dock systems for purpose of resale and purchase. Have made mmerous evaluations of bids to cavpare quality, life expectancy and maintenance costs vs. bid price. Analysis cf contractor request for extras vs. bid specifications and bid docixnents for a government agency. Legal testimony and opinions. Site analysis for approval or rejection of location. t. Installation and installation supervision. u. Preliminary feasibility studies. V. Was in ^'le last few years with United, the leader of a earn of people who designed and furnished dock systems for: The Harbour, Sandusky, Ohio; Harrah's Marina, Atlantic City, New Jersey; Backwaters Condominium Marina, Colunbus, Georgia; Battery Park Marina, Sandusky, Ohio and West Shore Marina, Weehawken, New Jersey. m. n. o. r. s. -3- T T?'^ •**W^sF'i-‘'^;’S. M^''-. ■ te-. ■ r^ W ‘"-i V * •. ' ♦. ;v>‘ # Frederic G. Hunt, RE. Marina Consultant S\ ecializing In Floating Docks PROJECTS ?LETED AND IN TOE PROCESS by FREDiRIC G. HUNT, P.E. 1. fm.safest:AND NATIONAL AGEUCIES A. Review o£ Floating Dock S\±mittals on Marina Project. B. Analysis of 40 year life inaintenance and operating costs for narina if designed of removable fixed piers or floating docks. C. One day seminar on shop and field inspection of floating boat docks. D. Seminar covering current floating dock types, materials and specifications with the end result being new specificaticms for all projects involving State monies. E. Investigation of ice d tge at a State Park Marina with reconmendations for correct winterization of docks in future winters. F. Analysis of flotation product for use at a National Park. G. Analysis of floats for canformance with project specifications. 2. FOR CONSULTING ENGINEERS B. C. D. A. On a Port Authority project for development of a marina. (1) Guideline specifications for 650 slip dock system (2) &>gineering analysis of bids (3) Review of submittal drawings and specifications A report on current guidelines for floating dock layout. Preparation of ccxrplete master set of specifications for a State agoicy after conducting a full day seminar on specifications. Adaptation of a State's standard specifications to a 380 slip dock system. Review of specifications for a 120 slip dock system for a State Agency. For a Metropolitan Park System. (1) Assistance in development of an overall master plan for a water oriented park eurea. (2) Assistance in preparation of a Request for Proposal to d^elopers for development of a park area which would include a marina, rack storage, outside trinter storage, food service, bike rental, bait, fishing supplies, etc. _ _ Review of plans and specifications for floating pier replacement project. E. F. G. 3. FOR MARINA S & OWNERS ■■■ ■ r.' *- A. A condition and life expectancy report prior to purchase of an existing marina. B. Site inspection and potential dock layouts to determine size potential and feasibility for a marina, prior to land purchase. At a new marina site. (1) Guideline dock specifications (2) Engineering analysis of bids (3) Assistance in writing of pxirchase contract C. 1700 M-“rriw^.ithAr Dr • rohirnbus. Ohio 4122 ’ ’"?" • .mmm M 1 <" .• *'l t'-- ill:' hK ( « hr ■'• f'- ■ "jr-. ■Sw*:. rft'-' tov-' >W-. •.•. 1^'^- :t • ^■:- (4) Review of sulsnittal drawings and specifications (5) In plant inspection of docks prior to shipment D. Buying an existing dock facility to be part of a new condominium development. (1) Ccnditicn report for existing fixed pier system (2) Specifications for upgrading existing dock syster. (3) Study of available de-icing systems E. For a marina addition to existing condcminiums (1) Layout of docks to get maximtm nxxnber of slips (2) Guideline specifications and request for quotation (3) Engineering analysis of bids (4) Assistance in writing of purchases contract and warranty (5) Review of submittal drawings (6) Inspection for contract conpllance F. At a new marina complex (1) Bigineering analysis of bids (2) Assistance in writing of purchase contract and warranty (3) Review of submittal drawings and specifications (4) Inspection service G. Prior to purchase of land for development (1) Land tase study for maximum income involving size and location for Condominiixns, Marina, Rack Storage, Boat Sales and Repair Area. H. At a new condcminiun and boat basin project (1) Review of proposed floating dock layout and calculating of selling price per slip as designed and charges per boat slip with bigger boats and variable mix. I. For j; wit^rside development at an old shipyard (1) Ttur i a Landscape Architect, the development of a 450 boat waterf.ont marina 2is ^rt of a comnercial/condaminixxn development. La>iv.., plans, specifications, bid analysis and construction inspection for floating docks and 260 unit rack storage facility. Also, coordination of all marina oriented landside facilities. J. For a large development of expensive homes. (1) Thru a marina developer and operator, the layout of slips for the tot ’ water area .-.tth systematic arrangernent for phase construction. K. Preliminary layouts of slips for a Lake Erie marina prior to purchase of land. L. Design and specify, analyze bids, write contract, review submittals and inspect installation for new marina project cn the Ohio River. M. Bid analysis for 96 slip adjiistable pier marina. N. Preliminazy studies for wave and ice problems and solutions for exposed Lake Erie marina development. O. Study of a half built new marina for analysis of work yet to be conpleted to become operable, prior to possible purchase. P. Design, specifications and solicitation of bids for new launch ramp dock at existing Ohio River Marina. Q. Analysis of debris problem at Mississippi River Marina and report reccmnending new debris deflector with design requirements for implementing construction. fcv-ilSs'. •!’'.Vi>-'-: ' ’>■ * :'Va- a. r^r;ir V'i-.'Tt i- r:!f w) ■\- m' vj^ '‘h 1 4. - • '^^5 ' ^, L irr . ^3. i R. Study of new layout for docks in existing irarina and design of rebuild and new anchorage for existing docks in new configuration. S. For a large new Great Lakes Marina, part of the total design team with responsibility for all floating dock layout, design, specifications, subnittal review, inspections, etc. T. After purchase of banknipt marina a study and report on what permitting and constnaction was needed to finish it and get it operating. U. Study of anchor types and loads for Buoy Field. ARCHITECTT/PLANNERS A. On a large new narina/condoroiniun project. (1) layout of dock system for best use of water space with approximately 400 boats (2) Study of availability of rack storage systems including cost and income estimates (3) Writing of specifications for docks and rack storage building (4) Engineering analysis of bids (5) Assistance in writing contract documents (6) Review of sxjkmittals (7) Inspections B. A one day seminar on floating dock layout, design and specifications with guidance for a master set of specifications for floating docks. 5. FOR MARiro^ mWfTRRSTnNATRES A.At a State Park. (1) Prepared master plan for expansion to a 750 boat capacity marina and housd9oat r«r\tal facility (2) Stijdy of three additional water areas for new marinas (3) A plan for orderly integration of present dock system and facilities into master plan (4) Study of construction methods for improving their own manufactured dock system. B. Review and analysis of proposed new "hememade" dock system. C. Design and development of swing mooring platform to dock 8 - 16* x 64' houseboats in a star configuration. D. Appraisal of floating dock system for use in obtaining expansion loan. E. Design of isolated floating platforms to moor houseboats. F. Plans for expansion of rental slip facilities at existing marira. G. Anchorage analysis and redesign for large houseboat rental marina after storm overloads. 6. FOR YACHT CLUBS * » 1. ''K' ■ ■ A. B. my :mk. C. alternate approaches to orderly replacement and upgrading. with estimate of cost for repla^wnent. -3- a-'' ■f: if'” pi!’' .V>(?!t'.' ;vVIf' y' /. *'ni Ut;. ■■., .t: "'f X. •i.: 7. FOR OONDCMINIUM AND MARINA ASSOCIATIONS A. Storm damage inspection of roofed floating docks with analysis of cause for failure and suggestions for repair and upgrading. Then final plans for i^rading of dock structure to provide adequate flotation .o carry increased load requirements. B. Analysis of sinking floating dock system with reccnmendations for repair. C. Analysis of dock failure due to ice movement with reccnmendations for proper winterization to prevent future damage. D. Anchorage analysis and reccnmendations for upgrading to handle todays loadings. E. Study of methods to raise freeboard on existing sinking dock system. P. Design mooring system for boats xising slips against wall with major water fluctuation. G. Review of bid proposals and suhmittal drawings prior to award of contract for additional docks at existing marina. H. -Design^ pl2uis, specifications and contract si^ervisicn for replacement of all flotation on a 200 slip Great Lakes existing homemade floating dock system. I. Analysis of recently installed dock system for relocation to provide better and safer entrance and exit configuration. J. Design of a barrier dock to prevent damage frcm "out of control” boats. 8. FOR OCXINTIES. CITIES AND CITY PARKS DEPARIMEJTTS A. Layout and design of landing system for coimercial tour boats. B. Design of floating dock system for transient boats up to 40' long at riverfront park, writing of specifications, analysis of bids and inspection service. C. Design az)d specifications for replacement of existing docks and new dinghy launch docks. D. Layout, plans, specifications, si±ndttal review, manxifacturing inspection and installation inspection for 130 slip floating dock system to replace old deteriorated docks and coordination of utility systems on docks. E. Analysis of cause of failure of present floating docks with reccnmendations for strengthening to increase life and reduce yearly maintenance. F. Design for expansion of boat launch area, boating school and launch ranp pavemait repair. G. i...Jign, specify, review submittals and inspection of new floating dock system to replace old docks in erusting marina basin. H. Engineering analysis of bids and submittals for new inland lake floating dock system. I. Analysis of cause of instability and loss of freeboard in existing dock systems with reconinendatians for correction. J. Inspection of existing dock system to recommend maintenance required and to advise floating dock manufacturer or work reqxiired under warranty. K. Coordination of plans and specifications for launch ranp docks. -4- fei'* Iv •li-'t ‘p. r' I' r- f?1' ¥ ■fer^ ft m' tej- • • ’’I- |: P" cIT »:■A'':' ¥^'" ■■ ^ t> .JTte- ®fe'--'v’ .< > ■t. L. Member of team preparing iraster plan for parks and recreation development and expansion for next ten years. M. Design, specify, review sutmittals and inspect floating dock expansion for existing Great Lakes Harbor. N. Design, specify, review siabmittals and inspect dinghy launch dock for Great Lakes Harbor. . x w O. Design, specify, review suhonittals and inspect new floating fishing pier for existing Great Lakes Harbor. P. Vice Chairman of a CLty*s Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. Q. Design and specifcations for floating dock systems on inland rivers and i^gg(jrvoirs at three locations totaling 335 slips plus three new launch nnv docks and floating breakwater, all with access for the physically impaired. R. Design and specifications for dinghy launch dock. • j i S. Condition and Life Expectancy report for an old 365 slip floating dock system with recormendations for repair, replacement and upgrading. T. Winter damage assessment and repair reconm^dations. U. Survey for conf>liance with access for physical disabled persons and recomnandatitxis for meeting current standards. V. Design and specifications for handicap fis^g pier and courtesy dock. W. Design and specification for handicap sailing ceiiter access docks. X. Andiorage study for relocated police patrol dock. 9. FOR PORT AUTHORITIES A. Study of an existing floating dock systan analyzing the need for upgrading to handle todays high profile boats and an estimate for that vqpgrading and expanded anchorage system. 10. FOR VARIOUS FLOATING DOCK A. Analysis of new dock designs to determine marketability. B. Consultation on floating breakwater theories and designs. C. Assistance in marketing strategies. D. Design of cable/winch anchorage system. E. Design of spud anchorage systems. F. Design of chain anchorage systems. G. Review of new dock design and rework of specifications. H. Review of new floating breakwater design with regard to manufacturing problems, narketability and probable dependability of results in use. I. Review and upgrading of specifications for existing dock systems. J. Review of owners contract docisnents prior to accepting. K. Review of spud anchorage design for roofed marina. L. Report on availability of existing flotation products. M. Report on slip, fairway and dock layout. N. Report on calculating of wind load on docks. O. Report on design of spud anchorage. jstandard design and material specifications. Q. Preparation of standard cwitract documents. R. Preparation of operating and maintenance manual. S. Preparation of standard warranty. -5“ |s-fe.^**'**. %■ tl?''.'.mr Ct ' f ■ I:'fe>r ^iv',:-- '■J ••' ■ rt E-^iJ t'SV"-^m I',' •'J^' % ny< m !tei:- mm :r*\.* •’ ■ #■ V- '"'f T. Preparation of tdnterization manual. U. Calculations for current and t ds loads. V. Review of layouts for ease c; winterization. N. Guidelines for design of new flotation imits. X. Review of anchorage design on nunerous projects for same floating dock manufacturer. Y. Analysis of new dock design with recarmendations for strengthening and anchoring plus tests and analysis of flotation material. Z. Analysis of cause ior failure of floating dock cantilevered finger and other docks due to overload by comnercial ships turning in a narrow river within a few feet of docks. AA. Review of new steel frame dock design with reccnmendatians for t^grading. AB. Coordinate and provide design and marketing guidance for dock system to be standardized for handicap access. AC. Seminar on history of metal framed floating dock systems and review of design for new steel frame floating dock system. AD. Testing and evaluation of flotation units to see if they met specifications on a Southern state project. AE. Review of new structural frame design for proposed floating dock system. AF. Design anchorage system for floating fishing pier. AG. Prepared installation and yearly removal instructions for three marinas located on rivers with ice flow. AH. Provided r^ort on design of spud anchorage systems. AI. Review of bid docisnents for errors, omissions and problems prior to pr^aring bid proposal. AJ. Research and report on deck material. AR. Review of plans for dock built of recycled plastic lunnber with reconmanded changes and inprovements. AL. Prepared questionnaire to be used by sales personnel for gathering all necessary design information to be used by engineers doing design. 11. TOR h RS OF PRODTTrTfi ngirn pw A. Seminar on history of floating dock systems and overview of what is currently available. B. Destructive analysis of present flotation isiit centering it with ethers on the market and recomnending ways to develop a better unit for government acceptance. C. Analysis of present flotation unit with suggestions for uoqrading along with market analysis and suggestions for revision of literature and advertising. D. Analysis of potential for new synthetic deck material and presentation on existing material. E. Analysis of new float with suggestions on marketing. F. Analysis of new power post design and reconmexidations on acceptable warranty. G. Testing of floats for shell thickness and foam absorbency. H. Standard designs for wood structure private docks to use suppliers type of flotation. -6- k.,*^Vr'‘- ®vvv •’ 1 i-V-.^ ■ afj3::< ‘■[j# |i‘ ¥ I- .Mm- rLs'---K i:“•■'I * t.,iS*-^- »w I Si®5WJ i}n i r rr. :^i • I .. '*-■ 'h ■' kT :<■ I. 4k li: 'f;i ,CV‘-:<T^r r-> ■-=r" ■:<-: • .V V-.:- ^v^ k-^yW' irtrr ^V •«: V:'5« W,y I. Flotation background presentation with suggestions regarding proposed new float. 12. m JWD SEMIWftRS A. For University of Wisconsin’s 3rd National Floating Structures Design Conference, San Deigo, California, a presentation titled, "Floatadon MaterialS'Their Past, Present and Future,” June 1992. B. For University of Wisconsin's 3rd National Floating Structures Design Conference, San Deigo, California, a presentation titled, "Perf rmance Specifications for Floating Dock Systems”, June 1992. C. For International Marina Institute's International Conference, a presentation titled, "Flotation: Past-Present-Future", Decenber 1991. D. For University of Wisconsin, 18th National Technical Conference on Docks and Marinas, a presentaton titled, "Designing and Specifying Floating Dock Systems", October 1991. E. For University of Wisconsin, Floating Structures Design Conference, a presentation titled, "Performance Specifications for Floating Dock Systems and Research Results on Foam Flotation”, June 1991. F. For International Marina Institute National Conference, a presentation titled, 'Water Absorption Characteristics of Foam for Floating Docks", December 1990. G. For University of Wisconsin, 17th National Technical Conference on Docks and Marinas, a presentation titled "Designing and Specifying Floating Dock Systems", October, 1990. H. For University of Wisconsin, Floating Structures Design Conference, a presentation titled "Performance Specifications on Docks Systems and the Flotation That Keeps Them Afloat", June, 1990. I. For Uhivarsity of Wisconsin, 16th National Technical Conference on Docks and Marinas, a presentation titled "Performance Specifications for Floating Dock Systems", October, 1989. J. For Uhiveraity of Wisconsin, "15th National Technical Conference on Docks & Marinas", a presentation titled "Design and Specifications of Floating Docdc Systems", October, 1988. K. For International Marina Institute, "Marina Design and Engineering Conference", a presentation titled "Manufactured Floating Dock Systems", December, 1987. L. For University of Wisconsin, "14th National Technical Confer^ce on Docks and Marinas", a presentation titled "Design and Specifications of Floating Dock Systems", October, 1987. M. For International Marina Institute, a seminar on "Buying and Planning a Profitable Marina", a presentation titled "Dock Design and Specifications", Jutj 1987. 13. PUBLISPgn tn addITON TO THOSE PUBT.fSwm IN OCTiJUNCTK^ WITH U A. Public Works Magazine, January 1992, "Designing and Specifying Floating Dock Systems." B. Proceedings of World Marina '91, by American Society of Engineers, "Performance Specifications for Floating Docks." -7- til iM L 15. C. International Marina Institute, 1991 Marina Design Technical Report #2, ''Design of Slip Widths for Tomorrow’s Boats - Not Yesterdays." D. International Marina Institute, 1991 Marina Design Technical Report #3, 'Vater Absorption Characteristics of Foam for Floating Docks." 14. RESEARCH 2ES A. Radc Storage, its cost, income and designs. B. Wind Loading on Floating Dock Anchorage Systems. C. 1989 Power Boat Widths. D. Determination of a siirple standard test proceedure for water absorbency of foam as relative to its use in flotaticxi units for floating docks. E. Determination of a siirple standard test proceedure and rating scale for puncture and penetration of protection materials used for covering around pontoon flotation. P. 1989 Power Boat Weights G. Investigation of cleat design, strength and failure mode. » WITOESS FOR LEGAL PROCEEDINGS A. Case involving a death on a fixed pier system. B. Case involving collapse of roofed floating dock system. C. Case involving a sinking floating dock system. D. Case involving an accident on a floating dock access rairp. E. Case involving a death where it was required to determine adequacy of wave attenuation device and entrance configuration at existing marina. F. Alleged patent infringement case for flotation product. G. Case involving personal injxiry where dock decking had extra wide openings tdiich caused a fall and injury. H. Case involving fall and injury off ran^ from shore floating dock. I. Case involving fall and injury on a bridge from shore to floating dock. J. Case involving personal injury to two children on floating dock anchorage system. Rev. July 1, 1992 -8- Jig 1 - ‘t- |v- I*-'¥> ?;f^. ^mr'M[ft r- W.. llfp- r. . I .r MINIMUM FLOTATION SPECIFICATION FOR STATES WITH FREEZE/THAW TEMPEPATURE CYCLES A.Flotation shall be extruded or expanded polystyrene or 0.9#/cu.ft. minimum density Water absorption shall be less than 3#/cu.ft. at seven days when tested by Absorption Test." The foam shall be of consistent ^ throughout the float and all beads shall be firmly bonded to each other. B.In order to prevent erosion of the polystyrene £°s"> it shall be encased around all six sides with pressure concrete, galvanized steel, aluminum, recycled plasuic lu^er, high or medium density polyethylene, fiberglass polyurethane coating. The enci iement shall i’* f“^9ned to resist puncture and to prevent attack by ducks, f , and other marine animals. Wood and recycled plastic shall have a minimum thickness of 1 1/2 . Poured . sprayed on concrete shall be a minimum of 2 thicx. Galvanized steel shall be a minimum of ^^^auge with 2 ^ ounce minimum coating. Aluminum shall be a minimum °£ -OiO thick Medium density polyethylene, high density polyethylene, fiberglass and sprayed or dipped polyurethane coatings shall have a minimum thickness or l/o . Additional encasement materials will be considered ^^®^ provide the same relative protection as the materi specified. C.All flotation which is within 100' of the extended noszle of a oasoline dispenser or within lOO’ of a line carrying gasoline polyurethane foam is also acceptable as a flotation material. For any floats installed after the effective date of this specification, they shall require future replacement whenever ?Sr foam becomes visible thru the encasement or loose particles of the foam appear on the water. V ■ *5'V? > - ^',- r I .7 :^r' Mf*.. r=i ; ;• ’ ?4 Mias it Jl^v* , 1*^e-' »i.. ■ Vp,'- ;'5 S' y' r^-,V0,i unit;ecl design associates eie-sar-aw July 24, 1992 Hr. Gabriel Jabbour 985 Konkawa Road Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 Dear Mr. Jabbour: We are transmitting herewith a copy of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources performance specifications used for floating piers. I personallysn r s * projects. Although this particular specification encloses the polystyrene, which it should, there is consideration being given towards eventually having the enclosed polystryene watertight. There are a number of reasons for this consideration, not the least of which is: 1. 2. Water absorption and limited life of the flotation units. Exposed polystyrene units are susceptible to many types of animal pene tration and provide potential for nests and being subjected to degredatlon by, believe it or not, use as an apparent food source for certain types of animals that live in or near the water. 3.Potential fuel degredatlon by contact, even in the water areas, by pene tration through deck boards and the like. Fuel spills are supposed to be minimal and will float on the surface so t^^at in most instances contact with the present method of enclosure advocated by the Michigan dnr does keep this to a minimum. 4.Enclosures will lessen other types of degredatlon and deterioration which has an effect on the successful life of the flotation units. If you have any questions or need additional information, please advise. Yours truly, UNITED DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. James E. Muschell, PE pib nil IWOPTM MAIM - CneBOVOAM, MICMIOAM A87B1 ' Aiir: V '^rr • V*mfme-A r-'i'v?TtAi r:'"- : ■• fc- ■!^‘’-4 .*r,- V “■Xr ■ "7 ci-r* »v’f (• ■■ U: SI '»V-r -■ !??.' •■>■5 • :-A .', m^: mf.ISS.-.A'Ifc;- »v il" ^4. H--: tl-;?- INTEROFFICE COMMUNICATION February 28, 1991 Serial No. 231-91 Kile No. A 3.1 TO:User's of Floating Pier Specification FROM:Narine Engineering Section Recreation Division MI Dept, of Natural Resources y SUBJECT: Floating Pier Specification is intended to be the basis for theThe attached floating pier specification manufacture and Installation of floating pier systems at both state owned and state sponsored (grant-in-aid) mooring facility development and expansion projects. The specification covers such items as pre-qualification of manu facturers, design criteria and dimensions, acceptable materials, workr*iship, installation, quality control, quality assurance, and related items. It is intended to be included in the technical specifications and supplement the construction drawings as part of the bidd ig/contract documents for the projects described above. It is not implied that this specification is regulatory document or a standard for the industry within the state of Michigan except as ^ pertains to mooring facility projects funded, all or part, by the Recreation Division of Natural Resources. Professional engineers retained to provide engineering services associated with development and expansion of such facilities shall be required specification as part of their bidding/contract documents. Such professionals are cautioned to review the document in detail and become thoroughly aware or it's requirement. Any item the professional takes issue with must the attention of the Marine Engineering Section for resolution prior Also, it must be kept in mind that each site is different and the specifications may require modifications to meet specific site conditions. the type of anchorage to be used. i ’i :i 1.1 1.1.1 1.1.2 1.1.3 1.1.4 1.2 1.2.1 W: Floating Pier Specification Revision Copy December 1990 DESCRIPTION Work Included: Design, fabricate, install and furnish all plant, labor, equipment, supplies and materials and perform all operations required for installation of a complete, fully functional and operational floating pier system, including but not necessarily limited to head piers, finger piers, bridges, anchorages, and (Describe utilities and appurtenances included as part of the Floating Pier system, if applicable) all as indicated on the drawings and as specified herein. Contract Orawinos. The contract drawings are general in nature and show basic floating pier layout with required dimensions, required cleat and fender locations, and certain required materials and details of construction. The piers shown on the drawings are patterned after the type manufactured by _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. However, the intent is not to preclude other pier systems of different manufacture as long as they meet the required design loads, are within the range of required dimensions, are constructed with the specified materials, and are of a quality equal to or better than that specified in this Section. Fabrication. The contract drawings are not intended to be used for fabrication. The Contractor shall prepare and submit at least sets of drawings to the Engineer for approval prior to fabricating and installing the required pier system. Other Materials and Equipment. Other materials and equipment shall be as indicated on the Drawings, however, all other materials not specifically described but required for a complete and proper installation of the work under this Section, shall be new, first quality, and as selected by the Contractor subject to the approval of the Engineer. QUALITY ASSURANCE OF AN ACCEPTABLE FLOATING PIER SYSTEM Qualification of the Bidder: Each prospective bidder planning to submit a proposal for this project shall submit four copies of a pre-qualification package to the Engineer no later than_ _ _ _weeks prior to bid opening for the purpose of obtaining pre-bid qualifications of the floating pier system they manufacture including the anchorage system specified. It is the intent of prequalification for prospective bidders to provide the engineer with sufficient information to determine whether the requirements of these specifica tions as well as the project drawings can be met if the proposed floating pier system being evaluated is selected through the competi tive bidding process. A minimum of five (5) years of proven ex perience in floating pier system fabrication and installation is required. - 1 - 1.2.2 1.2.2.1 1.2.2.2 1.2.2.3 1.2.2.4 1.2.2.5 1.2.2.6 1.2.3 ip-C ’ Reouired Information. The prospective bidder Engineer with the tollowing for evaluation: shall provide the Applicable specifications and typical fabrication drawings showing cross sections, details, attachments, connections, anchorage details and all other necessary information for adequate product analysis. If siioilar information was previously provided for a Michigan Waterways Commission sponsored project designed using these specifications, that information may be substituted with the understanding that the project engineer will be the final authority on the adequacy of the material provided. A list of existing installations placed during the required five (5) year performance period where floating dock, systems similar to that to be qualified have been installed at locations with similar climatic and ice conditions. Such listing shall also include the number of slips at each location, date installed and the name, address and telephone number of the installation's owner, or the Owner's local contact. Catalog information on all commercial equipment being installed as part of the system, whether specified or offered as a substitution. General literature covering the floating dock manufacturer and his product. Design calculations for piers, connectors, bracing, flotation, bridges, anchorages and related pier system components based upon specified loadings and conditions. Decking shall not be considered as part of the load carrying structure. All drawings and calculations submitted must be sealed by a Registered Professional Engineer ex perienced in the design of floating piers and anchorages. If the engineer is not a full-time employee of the pier manufacturer, proof must be provided of satisfactory experience in floating pier system design Including anchorages for conditions similar to those which will be experienced on this project. The burden of proof of the merit of the proposed floating pier system including anchorages is upon the manufacturer. If similar design information was previously provided for a Michigan Waterways Commission sponsored project designed using these specifications, that design information may be substituted with the understanding that the project engineer will be the final ai '‘‘jr- ity on the adequacy of the material provided. After review of the qualification package, the Engineer shall inform the prospective bidder in writing no later than ^_ _ _ _ _days prior to bid opening as to the acceptability of the bidder's system. The Engineer's decision shall be final. The successful bidder shall furnish and install one of the pre qualified pier systems found acceptable in writing by the Engineer. - 2 ' !>• ^.5." " 1.2,4 1.3 1.3.1 l..‘^,2 1.3.2.1 1.3.3. 1.3.4 • •Prospective bidders are cautioned that qualification of any floating dock system is not to be considered as a determination of complete product acceptability and that a pre-qualifled system may be determined by the Engineer as being in need of modification on the basis of subsequently introduced information on Shop Drawings or in the final submitted structural calculations as reviewed by the Engineer. In any case, the system furnished must comply with the design criteria specified herein. DIMENSIONS Ceneral: Pier layout shall be to the configuration shown on the drawings. Widths of piers are to the edge of the piers and do not include rubraiIs and fenders. Pier Widths: Piers shall be of the following widths or within the following ranges: a. Main pier width for piers up to 400 feet in length shall be eight feet. b. Main pier width for piers 400 feet or longer in length shall be 10 feet. c. Service pier width shall be 16 feet. d.Minimum finger pier widths shall be 3 feet for 30 and 38 foot long, 4 feet for 45 feet long and 5 feet for 60 foot long fingers piers, respectively. Piers may be up to 3 inches less than the specified widths to allow some tolerance in the manufacturing process. However, the pier width shall be uniform and the 3 inch tolerance does not imply that variations in width over the length of the pier(s) will be tolerated. Pier Lengths: Finger piers shall be 30, 38, 45 and 60 foot long as indicated on the drawings. Clear Widths: Clear widths between adjacent finger piers shall be as follows: a. b. c. d. Adjacent to 30' piers Adjacent to 38' piers Adjacent to 45' piers Adjacent to 60' piers 30' 35' 39' 46' If spring piles are indicated on the drawings, clear widths between adjacent finger piers shall be increased by 2 feet. - 3 - mk':' jiSi.- fe.k IE!iri?V.r-i 4'^:-S: V 51V r- ¥wtM-m- m:'-'lS>: A" ’:iu'^v p -, . i H.' r- u .■I" -V ■&K r ■K If,!.. Ei:.. «i. W'Pi’V'-felv .V",. i<. %m. if': ■fm' |.ft: 1.3.5 1.3.6 1.3.7 1.3.8 1.4 1.4.1,1 1.4.1.2 1.4.2 pi^- . '■< I© Bridge Widths: Bridge widths shall match pier widths but in no case where Individual finger pier bridges are used shall the clear width between hand rails be less than 30 inches. If roller connections are used on main pier bridges, the bridge width may be reduced to the pier width less 2 feet. Fender and Cleat Locations: Except if otherwise noted on the contract drawings, fender and cleat location shall be as shown on the 8 1/2” x ir drawings, designated FP-1 and FP-2 appended to this section. Any deviation in location of fenders and cleats necessitated by joints between pier modules, location of pow6r centers, location of anchor ages, etc shall be brought to the Engineer's attention during the shop drawing phase of the work prior to fabrication for his/her considera tion and approval. Fender Heights: The fender heights (distance from pier deck to top of fender) for the 30, 38, 45 and 60 foot finger piers shall be 4, 4.5, 5 and 6 feet, respectively. Fenders along the service pier, along main piers and the outer face of tee piers shall be 6 feet in height. Fairway Widths: Fairways shall have a minimum width of 1.5 times the length of the longest adjacent slip except if otherwise noted on the drawings. In general, slip length as used within the context of these specifications is equal to pier length except if otherwise noted. Fairway widths adjacent to broadside mooring areas shall be as shown on the drawings. DESIGN CRITERIA General: Unless otherwise noted, floating piers, anchorages and connections shall be designed in accordance with ASCE Report No. 50. "Small Craft Harbors'* dated 1969 or current edition. General Structural Design: All structural members shall be designed and appropriately sized to carry and accept all design loads without failure or excessive deformation. Members shall be so sized to compensate for reductions in cross section resulting from the drilling of bolt holes and cutting of openings needed for utilities. Only single width pier modules shall be allowed for piers up to 5 feet in width. Where the required width of main, tee and service piers requires fabrication from narrower pier modules, the individual pier modules shall not be less than four feet in width. Overlapping adjacent modules by staggering transverse joints to insure maximum strength is encouraged. However, overlapping is not required as long as sufficient longitudinal joint strength is otherwise provided. Loads: Piers, bridges, connections and anchorages shall be designed for the following loads and conditions. - 4 - few 0-^ te-iiSi?'i?^ii0- U0 - Nil:mmn. ■ 5 i ' V ’■. Pfe/ 1.4.2.1 Vertical: a. b. c. d. Dead loads shall be the entire weight of the floating piers and attachments including the utilities and anchorages. In addition, finger piers shall have their outer ends at least level with but in no case more than 2" higher than the elevation of the main pier at their plane of attachment. The ends of finger piers shall be as level as practical but in no case shall a cross slope of more than 3/4" for each 4' of width be tolerated under dead load conditions. w A uniform live load of not less than 30 pounds per square foot on bridges and on the deck and structural frame of the floating piers shall be used. Minimum live load for flotation shall be 30 pounds per square foot. Finger piers must be designed to withstand a 400 pound concentrated live load from the end of the finger pier without a loss in freeboard of more than 4”. With a 200 pound load on one corner of a finger pier there shall be no more than a 2" difference in freeboard across the end of the pier for each 3 feet of finger pier width. Combined dead load plus live load for piers and bridges shall be the actual dead load including utilities plus 30 psf live load. However, for purposes cf calculation, the combined dead load plus required 30 psf live load shall never be calculated as being less than 50 psf. Bridges shall be so designed that maximum live load deflection of the bridge is limited to 1/180 of the span. Extra flotation of the same general type and design used for the floating piers shall be installed at end sections as required to compensate for end reactions of bridges due to combined loading. In no case shall the supporting pier module at the bridge connection be less than the designated freeboard under combined loading nor more than 2" above the freeboard shown on the approved shop drawings under the full deadload including utilities. Pier manufacturers shall provide piers with dead load freeboards of not less than 22" or more than 26" (4" tolerance to allow for variations between manufacturers). However, actual dead load freeboard shall not vary appreciably from the freeboard designated on the manufacturer's approved shop drawings with piers presenting a reasonably level, flat, even surface to the eye under dead load conditions. As indicated, main piers shall be reasonable level, but in no case shall a cross slope exceeding 1 1/2" in 8' of width be tolerated under dead load conditions. At the design load of dead load plus 30 psf live load a freeboard of not less than 10 inches shall be maintained. . / - 5 - iMIi liMii ilt^i iM I II Ml rtruiTJiif •If:^ ;BI i I i :IX] fillla •rua ilaHaraHi :1a Ha ^Tal«a1 ^JaHiraf:! rtriTt af:Tailil« iWaniMMat rti^vinrirtrf illTlV^TnrnTa iHifTr iTiTiKTnniT:iiiTivnniTiT; raKriHiiiii •TK4<MZaK ra>TtL«l(r iItM«altliira #?:T# tm#a »HI| • ila^nr.'ariMi •Illaft riTiVa [arTaililai ■V ^ .rr-i’ . 1.5.1 1.5.2 1.5.3 1.6 1.6.1 1.6.2 1.6.3 Abbreviations: Reference is made in theses specifications to the codes and/or standards promulgated by the following agencies and organizations: ASCE ASTM AWPA AWPB AWS LWD SPIB American Society of Civil Engineers, 345 East 47th Street, New York, N.Y. 10017 American Society for Testing and Materials, 1916 Race Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 American Wood Preservers Association American Wood Preservers Bureau, P.O. Box 6085, Arlington, Virginia 22206 American Welding Society, Inc., 2501, N.W. 7th Street, Miami, Florida 33125 Low Water Datum Southern Pine Inspection Bureau Comoliance: Comply with those codes and/or standards specified in this Section and referenced above. Conflicts: In case of conflict between the referenced codes and/or standards, the most stringent requirements shall govern. SUBHIHALS Shop Drawings: The successful bidder shall be required to submit six (6) complete sets of detailed shop drawings of the complete pier system that was pre-qualified to the Engineer for approval prior to fabrication of the required floating pier system. The shop drawings shall show all dimensions, clearances, and anchorage locations. If utilities are included, drawings shall show the location of utilities including electrical conduit and junction boxes; waterlines, crossovers, risers and valves; fuel lines; forcemains; telephone and television conduit; and other required components including method/s of attachment. The detailed shop drawings shall bear the seal of a professional engineer registered to practice in the state of Michigan who is experienced in the design of floating structures, anchorages and related appurtenances. In addition, if design calculations for this specific project as described in 1.2.2.5 were not previously submitted during prequalification as similar type calculations were substituted, at the discretion of the engineer, six copies of said calculations may be required along with the shop drawings. Construction Sequence: submit a construction time schedule. The successful bidder shall be required to sequence schedule as well as a construction Record Drawings: At the completion of the work the successful bidder shall provide the Engineer with reproducible drawings of the floating pier system installation incorporating all changes made during the construction and installation process. - 7 - ■■■ mi'.. Ipt-J;<> ■ * O:-? 'it. ^ :?■ ^ Vi i.. . ‘^ *- :. a;u ■■ 1.6.4 1.7 1.7.1 1.7.2 1.8 1.8.1 1.8.2 2.1 2.1.1 2.1.1.1 ;••./ Quiqua itv Controity contro The successful bidder shall submit a copy of the program which Is used to manufacture their particular floating pier system. The quality control program submitted by the manufacturer will be used by the project engineer to establish his/her inspection schedule and testing requirements to insure compliance with the plans and specifications particularily in the following areas; a. b. c. d. e. Weld quality. Certifications for materials such as steel, galvanizing, wood, wood treatment, bolts and fasteners, floatation, and floatation encasement. Dimensional inspection. Galvanizing Quality of floatation material • and encasement during manufacturing. PRODUCT HANDLING Protection; Use all means necessary to protect the materials of this Section before, during and after installation and to protect the work and materials of all other trades. Replacements: In the event of damage, immediately make all repairs and replacements necessary to the approval cf the Engineer and at no additional cost to the Owner. CONDUIT AND PIPING IDENTIFICATIONS (If Applicable) All conduit and piping installed in the floating piers shall be designated by painted stencil marking indicating its respective use and/or purpose, e.g., electrical power, lighting, water, gasoline, diesel fuel, sanitary, phone or cable television. Conduit and piping shall be marked at all access locations. All deck mounted accessories shall be bolted to or through the pier frame. Additional and/or intermediate members may be required to accommodate adequate bolting of deck mounted power centers, lighting units, gasoline and diesel dispensers, pump-out units, etc. MATERIALS Uunbfir: Decking lumber shall be No. 1 select structural Southern Yellow Pine or better and shall conform to the rules of the SPIB as applicable. Framing lumber shall be No. 1 Southern Yellow Pine or better, and shall conform to the rules of the SPIB. Timber and lumber shall be pressure treated with chromated copper arsenate preservative in accordance with AWPB Standard LP-22 and each piece shall bear the AWPA Quality Nark. • 8 - • t . ** f • ' ■ mi' -mm 2.1.1.2 2.1.1.3 2.1.1.4 2.1.2 2.1.3 2.1.4 2.1.5 Deck boards shall not have any holes, loose knots or wane and shall not have sap or free flowing preservative on the walking surface. Lumber shall be kiln dried prior to treating to the moisture content designated in accordance with SPIB rules. All lumber shall have a minimum of 0.40 pounds per cubic foot of preservative retained after treatment except lumber which is in continuous contact with water. Such lumber shall have a minimum of 0.60 pcf of preservative retained after treatment. The Engineer, at his/her discretion, may assay the treated lumber and have the AWPB laboratory test the pressure treatment retention of all lumber prior to acceptance at the contractor's expense. After treatment, lumber shall again be kiln dried to a maximum moisture content of 19 percent. Structural and Miscellaneous Steel: Structural and miscellaneous Steel shall crnform to the requirements of the Standard Specification for Structu ?1 Steel, ASTM Designation A36 or stronger. All steel shall be zinc coated (hot-dipped) in accordance with the requirements of ASTM Designation A123. Structural Aluminum: Structural aluminum shapes and/or extrusions shall be made from 6061-T6 aluminum conforming to the requirements of ASTM Designation B221. Fasteners: Bolts, lag bolts, screws, nails, flat washers and lock washers shall be of the type and size best suited for the intended use. Low-c--ton bolts shall conform to the requirements for Grade "A" bolts, AjTM Designation A307. High strength bolts shall conform to the requirements of ASTM Designation A325 or A490. All fasteners shall be hot dipped galvanized or mechanically galvanized by the MACU Guard method or approved equal. MACU Guard is a process licensed by MacDennid Inc., 50 Brookside Road, Waterbury, CT 06708, Phone (203)575-5700. The coating thickness shall be of a minimum that corrosion of nonwear surfaces does not appear during the warranty period. Stainless steel fasteners may be substituted for protected steel. Cleats: Cleats shall either be heavy duty 10 inch cast iron galvanized units as manufactured by Wilcox-Crittenden or of bullhorn design made of cast aluminum alloy 319 (27,000 psi tensile, 18,000 psi yield) with countersunk hex bolt head lock features as manufactured by Macatawa Associates of Holland, Michigan, or an approved equal. Cleats shall be of the size indicated and shall be installed at the locations shown on the drawings designated FP-1 and FP-2 appended to this Section. Except if otherwise noted on the construction drawings, cleats shall be securely bolted directly to the pier's structural framing or fastened securely to the structural fraiaing through appropriate intermediate members as approved by the Engineer. Cleats shall be as close to the outside edge of the piers as possible and In such a location that tightening of bolts and nuts holding the cleats is as easy as possible. Bolts, nuts and washers (both standard and lock) shall be of adequate size and strength for tying up boats normally using the slip adjacent to the cleats and shall be hot dipped or mechanically galvanized. - 9 - sM- V-.,' ’^'O ^ 1 2.1.6 i-m% h-g;-. i. rt: - ■ • ■.-■ ■t-H. -s fV %. ' b; ■ 'fmfe' |“:^i:'. pi'. r • f-i?' p' f ‘■ ii-- |[? -• • - k;^> i. f:; . i!<;^ A"\ ^:-j‘ ‘tc' ku.'.*r •.t! j:- b-v ■ y-. f.Vr-k' i4v-.-PS ■. 2.1.7 2.1.8 2.1.9 2.1.10 2.1.11 2.1.12 Arc Welding Electrodes: Arc welding electrodes shall conform to American Welding Society "Iron and Steel Arc Welding Electrodes." Floatation Materials: The floatation material shall be closed cell polystyrene with an average density of 1.0 pounds per cubic foot and a buoyancy factor of 59.0 pounds per cubic foot to allow for moisture absorption. Galvanized Steel Sheet Metal: Galvanized steel sheet metal shall be at least 20 gauge conforming to the requirements, of either the Standard Specification for zinc-coated (Galvanized Carbon Steel Sheets of a Commercial Quality, ASTM Designation A526) or zinC'Coated (Galvanized) Steel sheets of structural quality, coils and cut lengths, ASTM Designation A446. The steel base metal, its fonaability and zinc coating shall be in accordance with ASTM Designation A525. The zinc coating shall with a minimum of 2.0 ounces per square foot. Aluminum Alloy Plate: Aluminum alloy plate shall be equivalent in strength to 20 gauge steel and be 0.124 inch thick, alloy 5052, H36 Marine Aluminum conforming to the requirements of the Standard Specification for Aluminum-Alloy Sheet and Plate ASTM Designation: 8209. Medium Density Polyethylene: Medium density polyethylene shall be black in color having a nominal thickness of 0.1875 inches with an allowable tolerance of ±0.0375 inches and shall meet the following standards: a. b. c. d. e. f. Density: 58.22 pounds per cubic foot ± 3/4%, ASTM 1505. Environmental Stress Cracking F50: 1000 hours, ASTM D1693. Ultimate Tensile Strength Range: 2490 to 2600 pounds per square inch, ASTM D638. Vicant Softening Temperature Range: F 235 to 240° F, ASTM 01525. Brittleness Temperature: -180O p, aSTM D746. Flexure Modulus Range: 96,000 to 100,000 pounds per square inch, ASTM D790. 1iftino Rings: Lifting rings, where used in lieu of lifting straps or other acceptable methods of removal, shall be of galvanized cast steel of a size sufficient to safely handle the anticipated loads. The rings shall have an internal diameter of 2-1/2 inches. Each pier module to be lifted using rings shall have four rings so located that the unit may be ifted without adversely stressing the pier module. If lifting straps are used the manufacturer shall provide the owner with a pair of straps of adequate strength to lift the heaviest module provided. Galvanized Pioe: Galvanized steel pipe for spud anchorage systems shall conform to the requirements of ASTM Designation: A120 or A123 as applicable. - 10 - '■ ■^■. .r- 2.1.13 2.1.14 2.1.15 2.1.16 NOTE: 3.1 3.1.1 3.1.1.1 3.1.1.2 Winches: Winches shall be equipped with removable operation handles and shall have automatic locks that positively hold design loads at any position. Winches shall be manufactured by Beebe Brothers or approved equals. The winches shall be rated at least equal to twice the designed load of the cable. The winch reel shall be of sufficient size to hold at least 20 percent more cable than actively needed. The winch reel drum and all sheaves shall be of sufficient diameter to avoid damaging the cable. Winches shall be rated on the basis of **holding capacity**. CitLlfi: Cable for cable anchorage systems shall have a breaking strength at least two times the designed load. It shall be galvanized, 6 x 19 construction, improved plow steel with fiber core or approved equal. Cable Hardware: All cable hardware shall be galvanized and capable of carrying all loads transmitted. Anchors: Anchors for cable anchorage systems shall be of a type compatible with the site conditions and of a size that shall sufficiently withstand twice the design loads. Add appropriate technical specifications for materials where required for electrical, water, sanitary pump-out, fuel service, telephone and cable television if they are to be included in this section of the specifications. EXECUTION Piers: General: Piers shall be pre-fabricated within practical limits in the plant by the pier manufacturer and delivered ready for flotation. All workmanship shall be first class in all respects as determined by the Engineer and any units not representing a finished and acceptable appearance will be rejected. If utilities are part of the work, all utility conduits, pipes cables, boxes, etc shall be located Inside the structural frame and not outside of the frame where they are exposed to ice and boat damage. Connector Plates and Connections: All connector plates, including those In-line, at the corners and at knee braces which receive loads from Impact and anchorage forces shall be of a height, width and thickness sufficient to dissipate the required loads to the frame work without distortion or damage. Connections may be either of the single or double shear type with hinge pin (bolt) holes parallel and along the hinge pin axis. Hinge pin holes shall be as tight as possible to eliminate excessive “slop” and unnecessary movement in the joints. Calculations may be required to demonstrate the frame's ability to accept such loads imposed through the connectors as well as the ability of the connections (single or double shear) to resist the loads without distortion or damage. - 11 - p;;r.r ■ •It’-'; •’ W ■ •\ mu m mL.;,,. ►r- ^.^1V ,t:- u Iti: Si ‘ t i' r.y ,,•* : . r ;^^ f?0r 3.1.1.3 3.1.1.4 3.1.1.5 3.1.1.6 3.1.1.7 3.1.1.8 vanized Steel: All steel galvanized members must be hot dipvanized after fabrication, including welding, and after the dril ling of bolt * les for the attachment of anchorages, utilities and deck mounted components. Exception is given only to those field welds which must be performed, as determined by the Engineer, at a custom connection and done so in the interest of quality control. r where applicable, enough coats of an acceptable cold galvanizing compound must be applied to the field weld to give a thickness equal to the adjoining original hoi dip galvanizing. . Finished Steel Members: All finished steel members shall be free from twists, bends, distortions, and open joints. All steel construc tion shall be free of sharp edges and burrs. Ends of exposed steel r.'smbers shall be or beveled. All coping and mitering shall be doi;e with care. Projecting materials and burrs which would prevent bearin'; of the various members on each other shall be removed. Weldinoi All welding shall conform to the requirements of the American Welding Society. Welds shall be a solid and homogenous part of the metals Joined and shall be free from pits or scale, and shall be of full area and length required to <ievelop the required strength for the intended use. All shop welders, welding operators, welding equipment and welding procedures used in production of steel struc tures shall have been qualified in accordance with the qualification procedures of AWS 01.1. Welders shall be certified to perform the welds which are shown on the fabrication drawings. Proof of qualifi cations shall be required. Boltina: All bolts, nuts and washers shall be of a size and :t*.rength adequate for the loads imposed and shall be set square with connecting structural members with the nuts drawn up tight. Lock washers or other devices or techniques shall be used to prevent nuts from loosening after being properly tightened. No bolt threads shall be allowed within the structural components in hinged type connec tions. Hinge pins or bolts shall be of a positive locking type which will not allow loosening or loss of the pin or bolt from movement of the Joint. High strength bolts shall be used where required in accordance with the American Institute of Steel Construction's specifi cations for "Structural Joints using ASTM A325 or A490 Bolts." Counterborino: Lumber shall be counterborH wherever projecting boltheads or nuts may damage boats or provide a hazard to pier users. Counterboring shall be sufficiently deep to permit installation of the bolts and nuts with washers well below the surface of the wood. Fastening of Deck Boards: Deck boards may be fastened either by nailing, screwing or bolting. If nailed, nails shall be driven to set the heads flush with or slightly below the surface of the wood. Number of nails used per connection, type and size shall be - 12 - ' j'.- sufficient to fasten the deck boards firmly to the nailing surface (timber framing or nailers) and provide a flat, even walking surface free from warp of any kind. Decking shall be screwed down for easy removal in those locations where electrical boxes, valves, drains, etc. roust be accessed. Where decking is fastened directly to steel frames, fastening shall be done with galvanized self tapping screws of a size and strength adequate to prevent shearing and breaking under normal operating conditions. Deck screws shall have heads flush with the deck surface or slightly depressed to provide a flat, even walking surface. Deck screws shall be installed so as not to fracture the wood and cause splintering at the i le. Number of screws used per connection shall be adequate to f mly^ attach the deck boards and provide a flat, even walking surfat . Fasteners of whatever type shall be located in symmetrical patterns throughout with fasteners in straight lines. 3.1.1.9 Deck Board Snaclno: Deck boards shall be installed with a 1/8 inch space between adjacent deck boards. Decking shall be installed perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the pier. 3.1.1.10 Deck Board Support and Installation: Deck boards shall be supported at a ouiximum of 3 feet on center with the boards laid with the best side up or if there is no best side then L rk side up. 3.1.1.11 Oneninos: Openings between adjacent floating pier modules shall not exceed 1-1/2 inches, however, the opening between adjacent pier module end deck boards shall not exceed 1/8 inch. All connections between floating pier modules shall not protrude above the level of the pier surface. 3.1.2 Floatation Units: Floatation shall be provided by closed cell polystyrene cellular materials, either preformed or expanded in place. The floatation material shall be fully encased in at least 20 gauge galvanized steel sheet metal, marine aluminum at least 0.124 inches thick, medium density polyethylene with a nominal thickness of 0.1875 Inches, wood having a nominal thickness of 2 inches, or a combination of these materials. In the past, polystyrene filled, end capped galvanized corrugated pipe of a least 20 gauge have been used as floatation units. Substitution of floatation units consisting of closed end, polystyrene filled pipe having a minimum wall thickness of 1/8 Inch are acceptable. Such floatation units shall be completely galvanized Including end c'.osure plates. If the pipe is used as a structural component, its thickness shall be sized accordingly. Pipe and galvanizing shall meet applicable requirements described else where in these specifications. 3.1.2.1 The floatation units shall be securely connected to the pier framing and deck so that the floating pier including floatation acts as an integral unit within the tolerances specified without damage or separation. The connections must be such as to prevent the tearing away or other damage to the floatation units and/or pier frames at the points of connection. Materials used to attach floatation units shall have a life expectancy as long as the unit itself. - 13 - r-.-P'i-'• • • i fiV ■. W P' fr|p;.- I fe- |. I'fe‘"p':'>w ml h: ^it!^rr 1. r«.f> A: rp: ■ m. M '■ ?&■ K;-1. iSff -'=j S’I-sr I-t'f.pv ''l}'‘ v^. \t ■ b:? r.. y i' |Sfe- p> if-wm-: 3.1.2.2 FloaUtion units shall be so designed and supported so that no damage occurs during shipping, handling or under normal use. 3.1.2.3 If floatation is installed at the manufacturer's plant as an integral part of the floating piers, the Engineer has the right to inspect the piers in various stages of manufacture to insure the floatation as well as all other materials used meet the intent of the specifica tions. Further, the Engineer has the right to make inspections at unannounced times and to choose the units to be Inspected at random. 3.1.2.4 If separate, sealed floatation units’are used, prior to the start of the manufacturing of or the ordering of such units, one unit of each size and type shall be sent to the Engineer for testing. The unit(s) shall be cut open to check on floatation density and absorbancy, completeness of foaming, shell thickness, etc. If the units meet the intent of the specifications, the Engineer shall give the manufacturer written permission to proceed with manufacturing the units or ordering the units if purchased from another manufacturer. If units do not meet the specifications, changes shall be made in the materials and/or fabrication until units, chosen thereafter at random, do meet the requirements of the specification. Units purchased from other manufacturers shall be so modified that they do meet specifica tions or units from other manufacturers which do meet specifications shall be substituted. Delays and costs due to tests, retests, modifi cations, substitutions and shipping shall be borne by the manufacturer of the floating piers. 3.1.2.5 Additional floatation units may be destructively tested at the jobsite from a random selection by the Engineer in accordance with Article 3.1.2.5.1. Additional testing will be at the discretion of the Engineer with approval of the Owner. If units tested meet the specifications, the cost of testing as well as the cost of floatation units destructively tested will be borne by the Owner. If units do not meet the specifications, additional units will be tested in accordance with Articles 3.1.2.5.2 and 3.1.2.5.3. The costs of such testing shall be borne by the manufacturer. 3.1,2.5.1 The Engineer may select at random one of each type floatation unit for removal and destructive testing out of every 100 floatation units shipped. 3.1.2.5.2 The finding of a unit which does not meet specifications shall be cause to choose three additional units for testing above the number originally required. 3.1.2.5.3 If any of the three additional units are not found to meet specifica tions then the pier manufacturer must stop manufacture, purchase or installation of additional units until he/she can prove all previously installed units are satisfactory and that future units snail meet specifications. The method of proving units are satisfactory shall be agreed upon by the Engineer and pier manufacturer. - 14 - 5ffi'>sf«i- f; 3.1.3 3.1.3.1 3.1.3.2 3.1.3.3 3.1.3.4 3.1.3.5 3.1.3.6 Bridges: General: Bridges lumber, tudinal Articles apart as A bridge shall be required between every pier and shore, shall have timber decks constructed of 2" x 6" or 2** x B" adequately supported, installed perpendicular to the longi- axis of the bridge and meeting the material requirements of 2.1.1.1 through 2.1.1.4. Deck boards shall be spaced 1/8" indicated in Article 3.1.1.9. Length: Bridges shall be of such a length tj never exceed a 1 verti cal to 4 horizontal slope with the water level at an elevation of __ _ _ _ _ feet below LWO. (See contract drawings for top of bridge elevation/s.) Bridge Connections: The bridges may be hinged at one end and have a sliding or roller( wheeled) connection at the other to allow for movement due to fluctuating wa^''r levels. Wheels shall be of adequate strength to carry the design live loads applied to the bridge in addition to the weight of the bridge, handrails, and utilities. Hinged connections at both ends may be used if the anchorage system used allows for the horizontal movement of the pier(s). In all cases, the bridge connections shall be so designed as not to present any excessive openings or significant differences in elevation between the bridge and point of connection at the shore and pier under a range of lake levels from_ _feet above to_ _below LWO. A hinged threshold plate shall be used with a sliding or roller type connection where the bridge joins the pier to avoid a step. The bottom of the ramp shall be designed so tnat the step, without the threshold plate, shall not exceed 6 inches. The required hinge threshold plate shall be attached at the bottom of the bridge, shall be the full width of the bridge and shall be 36 inches long if the step is 6 inches high. For lessor height steps, the length of the threshold plate shall be proportioned accordingly. The threshold plate shall be fabricated from galvanized steel plate of adequate strength and design to prevent abnormal deflection and shall have a slip resistant surface. Galvanized steel plates of a minimum 10 gauge thickness shall be installed on the pier deck using zinc or cadmium plated flat head wood screws under bridge wheels, sliding surfaces and threshold plates to prevent damage to the deck surface. Edges and corners of these plates shall be rounded to reduce the possibility of tripping. Plates shall be of adequate size that wheels, sliding surfaces and threshold plates will remain on them under any positioning which would occur due to movement of the anchorage system or variation in design water levels. The end of the pier under the bridge shall have a galvanized angle at le^st 4" X 4" X 1/4" in size installed horizontally across the full wid^h of the pier on the top edge of the pier. It shall be installed 15 - ll- F''K I F- ‘P? S;»>n: fI- r t'r. v^- -It*r.r^. I>; ■^^:- ::Vrn'i- p5;S- liPiSv ’ 'U&MSr 3.1.3.7 3.1.4 3.1.5 3.1.6 ^A?y-v- pr’r - . '.V.- in such a way that rails (wear resistant surfaced members) under the bridge will slide freely on the angle if the bridge goes above the level of the upper connection and rides on the end of the pier. The rails shall be of adequate length to ride on the end of the pier "angle" at high water due to movement of the anchorage system. Handrails: Handrails shall be required on both sides of all bridges and may be part of the structural support or separate units. Top rail to be 42 inches above the deck surface with intermediate railings so spaced so as to allow no more than 10 inches between adjacent rail* ings. All rails shall be smooth with*no sharp corners, burrs, etc., so as to make a smooth member for hand contact. Handrail and handrail brackets shall be designed to withstand a minimum concentrated load of 200 pounds applied from any direction at any point on the handrail. Fittings shall be galvanized. Sharp corners on galvanized steel handrails or trusses used as handrails shall be avoided by the use of short 45 degree miters, short curved sections, or other approved methods. Protrusions on the railing or on the bridges themselves shall not have sharp corners. Skirtino! Skirting is not required except if so noted on the con struction drawings. If required, exposed structural framework and flotation devices shall be skirted from decking to 2" or less above the waterline with nominal 2" thick wood meeting the lumber require ments as specified under Section 2.1.1. The skirting must be ade quately secured to the frame with bolts or other acceptable fasteners as dictated by sound engineering practices. Knee Braces and Fillets: All finger piers shall have knee braces that extend at least 4 feet along the finger piers and main pier. Larger braces may be used if required to gain the necessary strength for the loads applied but in no case shall the braces extend more than 6 feet along the finger piers and main pier. The knee brace Isosceles triangle area shall be covered with the same deck material used for other decking. The edge of each fillet shall extend slightly beyond the knee brace and the edge of the fillet shall have a rub rail to protect a boat from impacting upon bare steel. Fenderino: All fenders shall be of 6" x 6" nominal timber of the same type wood and treatment as wood decking. Fenders shall be located as shown on the drawings designated FP-1 and FP-2 appended to this section and/or the contract drawings. The length shall allow adequate fastening to the pier(s) and will insure the heights above the pier deck(s) specified in Article 1.3.7. All fenders shall be securely attached to the framework with a minimum of two bolts and the framework must be structurally adequate to accept without distortion design impact loadings applied to the fenders. Lag bolting of fenders to the timber side walls of wood type floating piers shall not be permitted along the "open" water side of service and tee piers or along those main piers where fendering is indicated on the drawings. All bolts, nuts and washers shall be galvanized with all bolt heads counterbored. Tops of fenders shall be "roofed" in a manner satisfac tory to the Engineer. 16 - 3.1.7 m: m'-- 3.1.8 3.1.8.1 3.1.8.2 3.1.8.3 3.1.8.4 3.1.8.5 Rubra 11s: Since fendering is specified along the edges of finger, tee and service piers; rubrails shall not be required in these locations. However, timber rubrails shall be required along the edges of main piers where vertical fendering is not required to protect boats from rubbing on the "saw toothed" surface presented by the edges of deck boards. Skirting, if required, may be substituted for rubrails if they are extended to cover the "saw toothed* surfaces previously described. The rubrails shall be located so that their top edges are even with the top walking surface of the deck. Rubrails shall be firmly attached to the pier framing with adequately sized bolts spaced at a maximum of 5 feet on center. Bolt heads shall be of a type providing a flush surface or the holes for the bolts shall be counter- bored. Rubrails shall be nominal 2" x 6" unless noted otherwise and individual sections of rubrail shall not be.less than 8 feet long. Ladders: Safety ladders shall be installed at the ends of all finger piers and along main piers where finger piers are absent as well as at the ends and along the open water side of service and tee piers and ends of main piers where necessary to maintain 100 foot maximum spacing between adjacent ladders. Ladders at the ends of finger piers shall be so attached as to accommodate spuds if spuds are required at these locations. Except if otherwise noted on the contract drawings, spacing of ladders along the main pier/s and/or along the open water side of service and tee piers shall be as shown on the 8 1/2" x 11" drawing, designated FP-3, appended to this section. Ladders shall be constructed of galvanized steel, aluminum or an approved equal in accordance with accepted engineering practice. Materials shall conform with applicable requirements of this specifi cation. Clear spacing between vertical rails shall not be less than 18 or more than 24 inches with on center spacing of rungs of 10 to 12 inches. The bottom of ladders shall project down into the water so that the top of the bottom rung is 36 inches below the still water surface. The top of the rails shall project 36 inches above the pier deck surface with rungs omitted between the rails above the deck. Ladders, except those at the end of finger piers, shall be so designed as not to project more that 4 inches from the edge of the pier(s) so as not to interfere with the movement of boats. Ladders shall be located next to fenders on the ends of service and tee piers and where broadside mooring is intended to protect from damage by and to boats. Ladder^s shall be securely attached to the piers using a method of attachment that shall allow the ladders to be swung out of the water during the boating off-season. That portion of ladder rails projecting above pier decks shall be painted safety orange for easy visability. pi-^- m - 17 - ;•=te •tm;»' ifi #'■it' I.*u I ■ 3.1.9 3.1.9.1 Anchoraoe System: Rengral: The floating piers shall be secured with a .type anchorage system. The anchorage system shall secure the Hoating piers under the most severe loading conditions given in Article 1.4 DESIGN CRITERIA and at all water levels from +_ _feet above IGLD to the feet below IGLD. The manufacturer shall provide a design for type anchorage system to be used for this particular floating pier system. The design shall be approved prior to bidding in accordance with Article 1.2 QUALITY ASSURANCE OF AN ACCEPTABLE FLOATING PIER SYSTEM. The shop drawings shall include the anchorage system design and shall be approved by the Engineer prior to fabrication and installation of the floating pier system. 3.1.9.2 3.1.9.2 Tplescooipq Spud Tvne Anchorage (where specifiedl: 1 Spud guides (wells) and their supporting members shall not protrude above the deck surface adjacent to the spud locations. If spud guides oroject below the bottoms of floatation units they shall not be of a length that will allow "bottoming out" in the project depths/s shown on the drawings. For purposes of design, water depth shall be the difference between ‘he project depth shown on the drawings and a water surface _ _ _ _feet below L.W.D. less one foot. 3 1 9.2.2 Spuds shall be installed in a vertical position so that pier modules will not bind when moving up and down from fluctuating lake levels. 3.1.9.2 .3 Telescoping spud sections shall overlap a minimum of two feet under all lake level conditions specified in Article 3.1.9.1. 3 1.9.2.4 Where bridge connections cause movement of the ^ along the pier's longitudinal axis from fluctuating lake levels, the spud guides (wells) shall be so designed to allow for this movement. 3 1.9.2.5 The section of inner spud in the lake bottom shall have an or other device that shall allow the bottom spud section be hooked and removed thru the upper spud section. Where soil conditions are their reguired two foot overlap. 3 1.9.2.6 Inboard spuds shall not be allowed except if a special design frame, floatation, connections, and deck by the that the spud cover provides a flush, "trip free walking surface, the spud wells can be easily accessed thru the deck; the spuds never raise the cover and project above the deck under ^11: \**^® ^®''®^ conditions specified above; and do not interfere with utilities. 18 - &/: •: 'J. s- :v. >r: .r' . 3293 fable Tvoe Anchorage (where snecifiedl: 31931 Winches and winch stands shall be so mounted as not to protrude into the finger pier walking surface or clear width of the main or tee piers. If not shown on the drawings, the minimum clear width is five feet. In addition, winches and winch stands shall be so mounted as not to interfere with moored craft. 31932 Winches shall be mounted high enough on the winch stands to allow full swings of the cranks to be easily made by the operator/s. 1 9 3 3 'Jinches shall be so designed and mounted on the pier to keep changes direction as well as the number of rollers, pulleys and eyes over which the cables ride from winches to anchors as few as practical. 3 1 9 3 4 The under water exit of the cable shall be deep enough to clear all power and sail boats normally using the water area over the cable. For design purposes the deepest draft of craft using the 30,38,45 and 60 foot long finger pier slips are 7, 8, 10_and 12 feet, respectively. The deepest draft of craft mooring broadside to main, tee and service pier, shall be.12 feet. For purposes of design, the drafts shall be considered to be below a plane feet below low water datum. 3.1.9.3.5 Anchors for winch-cable systems, if not shown on the drawings, shall be of a concrete gravity type or fluke type of a size and configura tion providing anchorage capacity of at least twice the calculated anchorage loads. NOTE:Add appropriate technical specifications for execution where required for electrical, water, sanitary pump-out, fuel service, telephone and cable television if they are to be included in this section of the specifications. _ _ _ 3.1.10 3.1.10. Installation: The pier manufacturer shall provide a full time superintendent at the job site to supervise and coordinate the unloading, assembly and installation of the floating pier system including anchorages, bridges and utilities as well as to coordinate pier related activities with those activities that are the responsibility of other trades and/or contractors. 3.1.10.2 A laxinum ununt of fabrlcition and assembly shall be pier manufacturer's plant rather than on the job site. If utilities are part of the work, as much of the utility systems as practic shall be installed in the floating pier manufacturer s plant either by their own qualified personnel or by bringing qualified contracto s into their plant. The only exception is where utilities easily be installed on site by merely leaving the deck off until utilities are - 19 if. . L'*'V ■ i P'- p" -■ i; |. 1^ ■ rr ir--m^'mdM •r. W^"IP®/' m'®-:'Vib'- ■W:' I- & 6t fc-te'- Mift:•fei'S''' fc^::»F I' pW- p a 0ir ■fe sir tp>-m •'‘i'.i ^ . - • »• fe'- in place. In the latter case, the same degree of workmanship and care in installation will be expected as if the work was done in the manufacturer's plant. 3.1.10.3 Piers shall be carefully unloaded and kept in orderly piles or stacks until placed in the water. None but competent craftsman shall be employed to float and anchor the piers. Workmanship shall be first class throughout. 3.1.10.4 4.1 4.1.1 4.1.2 4.1.3 4.1.4 4.1.5 5.1 5.1.1 Each main pier and finger pier shall be securely tied to avoid damage until permanent connections to anchorages are made. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS MANUAL Upon completion of the project, the Contractor shall furnish the Owner four (4) copies of a "Maintenance and Operations Manual," which shall Include instructions and related information for maintaining and operating the floating pier system and anchorages including utilities, if applicable. Utilities include but are not necessarily limited to electrical, lighting, water, sanitary pump-out, fuel, telephone and cable television systems. The Contractor shall include in the manual, a detailed procedure for systematically maintaining and winterizing the floating pier system, anchorages and utilities between boating seasons, as well as mini mizing ice damage to the system during the winter. Although it is intended to leave the floating pier system in place throughout the winter, the Contractor shall also include in the manual, a detailed procedure for systematically removing, storing and reinstalling the floating pier system for the purposes of repair and maintenance. The manual shall include reduced size copies of the final "as built layout and fabrication drawings; a listing of purchased items or parts likely to need repair or replacement such as power centers, lighting units, fuel dispensers, sanitary pump-outs, flexible connections, cleats, valves, “special" bolts and fasteners, etc.; and a copy of the warranty. The list of purchased items shall include the name, address and phone number of suppliers and shall be accompanied with appropri ate catalog cuts and manufacturer's specifications. The instructions for maintenance shall include preventive maintenance procedures as well as ordinary maintenance and shall include schedules for such activities. WARRANTY The pier manufacturer shall execute and deliver to the Owner, before final payment, on his/her letter head, a letter of warranty plus labor and material guarantee which shall include at a minimum the following words and items of performance: ipier manufacturer name) warrants for five years, from the date of acceptance of the entire floating pier - 20 ..s, .f . v‘T.'S' h- .\ * V .IPj.Ur. A h,' A-i''. i':pS':- m %■ ■■■«; '■ni '■'■•'■>nV--Wf%. '■ ?■ ■■ ' system by the owner, that the floating piers and all related items shown on the drawings and included in the specifications shall be free from defects in design, construction, materials, workmanship and installation when utilized as intended and within the conditions specified. Should any defects develop during the warranty period, the manufacturer shall provide the necessary materials and labor needed to correct the defects by repair or replacement without expense to the Owner. The warranty specifically excludes acts of nature or use producing conditions beyond the design criteria set forth in these specifications. Coanercially purchased items, including parts of utility systems, shall be warranted for one year or the warranty period provided by the manufacturer, if longer than one year. Workmanship provided on the Utility Systems will be guaranteed for one year from the day of acceptance. The pier manufacturer shall not be responsible for damages caused by the Owner not operating and/or maintaining and/or winterizing the floating pier system in accordance with the maintenance, operating and winterizing procedures provided by the dock manufacturer in the "Maintenance and Operations Manual" approved by the owner at the time of final acceptance. Specific items of floating pier performance during the warranty period are as follows: 1. The average freeboard shall not, have decreased more than 1 1/2" from the average freeboard that existed at the time of the original Ip tallation at the end of 1 year and not more than 2 1/2" at the end -f the warranty period. However, it is expected that decrease in freeboard will be relatively uniform and that the piers will remain relatively flat and level. 2. Flotation units shall remain in their original condition, without cracks and show no signs of stress and damage which will result in premature failure. 3. Deck boards shall not show signs of dangerous deflection or deterioration to a degree that would necessitate replacement. 4. Deck screws, if used, shall not pull out or shear off. 5. Connectors and connector bolts shall not show excessive wear to the point of needing replacement during the warranty period. 6. Steel members showing evidence of rusting due to poor galvanizing of steel during the warranty period shall be repaired by methods described and preapproved in the Operations and Maintenance Manual. - 21 - iit.i 0'.: la; P‘w w i. %.fcv'u. ^•p^.pi;mte- j^r;'.- h.-w i;f'. m-' ir vv*^;^ VP’’:|g.; 1/ “k; ■ !■ kt ■ •’ ka;;:-- r-' '•-it-v’v :A. . B •:fci?' V ■: ' .■, > ^ ■ i*'■ ■ p.'* <*?«*.■ ter i;„ *l=J l&fc-:. 5.1.2 S.1.3 5.1.4 6.1 6.1.1 6.1.2 6.1.3 6.1 4 7.1 7. At the end of the warranty period torsional deflections produced under dead loads and/or live loads at the end of fingers shall not be 50% greater than those allowed when the piers were initially installed. 8. At the end of the warranty period not be 50% greater than the maximum initially installed. the cross pier slopes shall allowed when the piers were 9. Nonwear surfaces of bolts and nu.ts shall be replaced if they show signs of rust during the warranty period. Items not meeting the conditions of this warranty and any damage caused to the dock system due to failure of items or units covered by this warranty shall be repaired or replaced under the direction of, and at the expense of, the pier manufacturer. The agreed date of acceptance of the completed pier system is The warranty shall be for a period of five (5) years from the date on which the completed work is turned over to and accepted by the Owner. The Owner shall give notice of defects, covered by this warranty, by phone in emergencies and in writing to the dock manufacturer ininediately upon observance of the defects or when observed during the annual inspections. It is intended that the above allowed changes in freeboard, torsional deflections, and cross pier slopes (items 1,7 and 8) are due to noraal deterioration of the piers and/or absorption of water by floatation material. Such changes do not apply to effects caused by changed environmental factors such as increased loadings due to marine orQanlsns or by loadings due to Items added since the piers were installed and which were not : lowed for in the original design. ANNUAL INSPECTION The pier manufacturer shall provide a qualified person to make an annual inspection of the floating pier system every year throughout the warranty period, at the expense of the pier manufacturer. The inspection shall be made in the presence of the Owner's represent ative at a time mutually agreeable to the Owner's and pier manufac turer's representatives. The purpose of the inspection is to point out needed items of repair and where routine maintenance is required. Two copies of an inspection report covering the above items which need to be taken care of shall be prepared by the pier .'^nufacture' and sent to the Owner's representative. PAYMENT - 22 - • ■.V, r; -i'-.-.v^?' BB-- '' •V. y 11/ te{’fe=‘ -' ai.; ^ i>t ■>•;' • 'It ■^>:V f'u 1^-©S'- mr'- m >. j' liAV.-'i'i K'-' < Ite! $><... 0^.£:^7~ y^Ay/D f£‘AJ/D£:/2. S/QAC./A/C3r ^SCA^JETAi^A 7-/C^ //' C/^7"<'r«o S* /r£‘Ay^£T/Z /^Sr/^TVv^ JZ' O-JZ" JB'^OAy^ /^/Ayt^sr/2. /^/£:as. Mm.0 AT/D^Z Km ’ ■K'r'M*' !^'> "'f m ySm ?-■ ,v ‘r ,& ■ hr-m.k:-» **4 ;•* iW'pl'-?' ws fg';: *«.-■ •-■>• *-;.t;'''v >s ;- ’■ ■ ■ •j’' V; /^AyjO^r/s. ^ kS ' ' * ' ■ \S<o/-/^y^^ T‘/<^ ^S' jic::>Ayc5 y^yjOZ.yAy£: ^^7>u^£:Ay \ JZ' *i4 J ^ • J ^ 43' J 1 3' ■ 1. 3 \ ' /.OAyc^ ^/JU<^£T/Z % ©/Ay y^yo^DC.^: <D^ •> - X ■^■k. PS 0CT3 £=. 0C=3 o» p[la • * ^ kC - SiT^nrrTlSl® ' is.ji J LI IJ d (7^ PS □ crzn ©s © 3 ni/ © 3 , s= «=3 ] • 7 'V - •"^l, P e 5S5wi^ ;. i: #T3W *► «-v ' * X! I ^ iil" - f c ^ ^Vc:^ U j J wm ’■.-*-;■ ^SBm 1—- r*'--x ■ L:3^T4 .vry ■,,t> . -^in - •'• —Iffv .-2 —.-iii: c0=3 @) r'—3^T/ □ cm3 (r ©s=. ,'i ;•>• '-.r •x*- X> Nic'^ ^, \ ____ t '■“ ... / / oi ■7 J 0> A• I-- [plR©JiCT ©[^©AINIIIIATOOIN! i‘ S'A ' V •f UNITED DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. S'. JOHN H. -ILAK, PE project wNCINEER COMPUTER WAVE MODELING BREAKWATER DESIGN SITE ENGINEERING/UTILITY DESIGN f W-' i;' - william p. farrano, aia PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT ARCHITECTURAL PLANNING JAMES E. MUSCHELL, PE FELLOW ASCEwSENIOR ENGINEER architectural design pv Kf-rr. •• i. i LEIGH H. THURSTON, A5LA principal LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT LAND USE PLANNING SITE DEVELOPMENT DESIGN Si ’■ ■' V. RON TE20 MARINA mooring PLANNING MARINA LAYOUT DESIGN •QTAL COMPUUTER CAOO SERVICE I- :• rV t C * * ;t^ l^; v^ : * »s4" '-’.' ' T |£r-.,-' iV, *1 • :.i-,v“:^^ i- w%’ up& UNITED DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. in NO. MAIN ST.. CHEBOYGAN. MICH. 49721 TOPICS OF SPECIAL INTEREST EXPERIENCE UOA has specialized in the design of harbors, marinas, and waterfront work, coastal engineering and related fields since it was first organized in 1955. The company has actually designed In excess of 300 waterfront projects during its history as a consulting company. COMPUTER MODELING UOA has developed extensive ccmputer modeling programs of wave analysis utilizing the Corps of Engineers research data, the latest THA spectrum, and Goda's update for random seas and of maritime structures. As part of this program methodology UDA also has the capability of developing and drawing with the AUTOCAD system the numerical models of the diffraction diagrams and the refraction diagrams generated by the approaching waves analysis. KELVIN FUNCTIONS UDA has programmed the Kelvin functions in conjunction with the Kerr-Nevel equation which permits the rapid computer analysis of vertical ire forces on piles and structures for any variable ice property that may be selected, this same program is applicable for the computer analysis of ice loading potential for any selected load that could be placed on an ice plate. UOA has over the years done insitu ice load measurements and confirmed the accuracy of the theoretical ice forces developed by the Kerr-Nevel equation. ICE PILE SOIL RESEARCH UDA has actively cnegaged in testing various theories with respect to the ice-pile-soil resistance capability for various soil conditions and various ice thicknesses. CAOO SYSTEM UDA is state-of-the-art with the AUTOCAD system utilizing the latest technology in preparing drawings with disk storage capability which permits rapid modifications at very low cost, and also permits rapid retrieval for subsequent drawing reviews. UDA also utilizes the compact disk system (CDROM) for orage of specifications and product data. TOTAL ELECTRONIC STATION UDA utilizes a total elertronic station which permits field observation of wave heights, soundings, and topographic survey data that can be recorded and transcribed through the computer to the printer. FLOATING BREAKWATER RESEARCH UOA is conducting research and development with Allen Dock Manufacturing of Florence, Wisconsin for constructing a floating breakwater. This type of project is of special Interest to the Fish & Wildlife Service for areas of smaller wave intensity that will ultimately replace the need for such a structure to physically occupy the bottomland and interfere with fish migration and habitat. Floating breakwaters also have the potential of easily being moved for location adjustment of the protected facilities. A proto-type is being constructed for testing under various conditions. The most important use of a floating breakwater may be its use as a secondary breakwater which could permit a much lower cost rubblemound breakwater as the outer or initial wave interceptor. __ _i. -V i:r'5,-> •.*f- S;-- • ^ .' '•T^. k*r‘ ■. ,.:2 'Si?'? -ft?-' ms S.vV II UNITED DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. ni NO. MAIN ST., CHEBOYGAN. MICH. i3721 PROJECT LIST INVOLVING ICE ENGINEERING MARINE TfPE DESIGN COVERING BREAKWTERS, DREDGING. MARINAS. BULKHEADS, SHORELINE STABILIZATION, AND HARBOR DEVELOPMENT 1990 1990 Navy Pier Dockwall Project, Chicago. Illinois - U.S. Coast Guard Station, Tawas - 1990 Presque Isle Harbor Development, Presque Isle - 1990 DeTour Harbor Additional Mocring Facilities, DeTour - 1990 Bois Blanc Island Cowrercial Pier Renovations, Bois Blanc Island Agi 4 Associates, New York Port Authority, New York - 1990 Haimiond Bay Conrercial Fishing Pier, Hamrond Bay - 1990 Allen Dock, Burns Ditch Indiana - 1990 Johnson Su.tronk Weinstein 4 Associates, Buffalo Redevelopment Waterfront Project Duncan Bay Development, Cheboygan - 1989 WalStrom Marine. Cheboygan - 1989 Harrisville Harbor Breakwater Closure - 1989 Cheboygan Lock 4 Dam Spillway Repair - 1989 iteeco Marinas Floating Design - 1989 Layola Lakefill Project (JJiR) - 1989 Northwest Marine, Charlevoix - 1989 WalStrom Marine Facility, Cheboygan - 1989 Rogers City Marina Expansion - 1989 Browns Marina Complex, St. Ignace (JJ4R) - 1989 Three-Fires Point. Petoskey (JJ4R) - 1989 Sheboygan, Wisconsin Bulkhead and Boardwalk - 1989 Pintar Marina Dovolopiront, Bay City - 1988 Edison Sault Forebay, Sault Ste. Marie - 1988 Kenosha. Wisconsin Marina Development (JJ4R) - 1988 Raisin River Development, Mt, Clemens - 1988 Cross Winds Marina, Whitehall - 1988 Delavan Lake Project, Milwaukee, WI (Donohue) - 1988 Escaraba Marina Development DCA, Camiros - 1988 City of Cheboygan DCA Marina - 1988 Knouff 4 Knouff Lake Rocsevelt, Was^'^ngton - 1988 Hal Strom Marine Boat Hoist, Cheboygan - 1988 Port of New York (J. Agi 4 Assoc.) - 1983 Alpena Harbor Development - 1988 Presque Isle Harbor Breakwater (St. of Michigan) - 1988 North Point Marina, Zion, Illinois - 1988 Fox Marina, Lake Charlevoix - 1988 Runquist Marina, Lake Charlevoix - 1988 Williams Construction Company Marina, Monroe - 1988 Cheboygan Lock Gates (St. of Michigan) - 1988 St. Aubin Park Marina. Detroit (Engineering) - 1987 Knouff 4 Knouff Big Horn Canyon, Wyoming - 1987 Harrisville Harbor Dredging - 1987 - 1990 -1- |._Aj ■ .t ...C'i' -' ■’^ -g. rf’' ;■ ?>s • k'T . ' y: ■*> h. >. ?■ v;^ a ^■.»r V'j.A T r >.*4' >v n'v'i. •'r;. ’if' ■: •* UNITED DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. Ill NO. MAIN ST.. CHEBOYGAN, MICH. 49721 Anchor Inn Marina. Cheboygan 1987 The Landings, Boyne City, Wave Study - 1937 Sun Valley, Idaho Marina - 1987 Mallard Creek Marina, Port Huron - 1987 East Chicago Marina Expansion - 1987 United Technologies Shoreline Stabilization - 1987 Procter S Gamble Modifications, Cheboygan - 1987 Edison Sault Electric Hydro Pier - 1987 U.S. Coast Guard Mackinaw Modifications - 1987 Mackinaw Island Marina (St. of Michigan) - 1987 Galvafoam Structural Evaluation - 1987 Markley Marina Expansion, Mt. Clemens - 1987 Edison Sault Power Canal - 1987 Manistee Breakwater (Corps of Engineers) - 1987 Fayette State Park Extension Piers (St. of Michigan) - 1987 Harbour Pointe Marina - 1987 Rogers City Waterfront Development - 1987 Boyne City Transient Piers - 1937 Oscoda Harbor Study - 1987 Edison Sault Electric Hydro Plant - 1987 Hammond Bay Biological Station (U.S. Fish & Wildlife) - 1986 South Haven Breakwater (Corps of Engineers) 1986 Halstroir. Marine Waterfront Development - 1986 Knouff & Knouff, Spokane. Washington - 1986 Charlevoix Breakwater (Corps of Engineers) 1986 East Jordan Fish Weir (St. of Mich 4 U.S. Fish 4 Wildlife) - 1986 Moffatt 4 N-chol, Long Beach. California - 1986 Mackinaw Island Pier - 1986 Boyne City Revetment - 1986 LaCroft Waterfront Development - Charlevoix - 1986 Seavitt Revetment - 1986 Hemingway Point Harbor. Lake Charlevoix - 1986 Anchor In Marina - 1986 Cleveland, Wisconsin Harbor - 1986 Marquette Harbor - 1986 Harrisv.lle Harbor - 1986 Floating Boardwalk, Cheboygan - 1986 Dredging Project, Whitehall - 1986 Floating Karina, Page, Arizona - 1986 Great Lakes Yacht Club Marina, Whitehall - 1986 Chief Wawatam Mooring Site (Temple. Barker 4 Sloan in Boston) - 1985 Lee's Ferry Docking. Page. Arizona (Dept, of the Interior) - 1985 Lake Michigan Shore Stabilization. Naubinway - 1985 North Shore Development Company, Burlington, VT • 1985 Anchor In Karina Expansion, Cheboygan - 1985 Floating Walkway - knouff 4 Knouff. Spokan, WA - 1985 Fayette State Park Mooring Facilities - 1985 Floating Docks, Indianapolis. Indiana - 1985 - * •W.- ‘i: : ■ UNITED DESIGN ASSOCIATES. INC. ni NO. MAIN ST.. CHEBOYGAN. MICH. 49711 Black Bay Marina - International Falls. Minn - 1985 East Chicago Marina - 1984 Procter & Gamble Ice Boom, Cheboygan - 1984 State of Michigan Ice 4 Marina Research - 1984 Sheboygan. WI Breakwater - 1984 Glacier National Park - National Park Service - 1984 .. .. r.., ..n Mackinaw city Harbor Dredging and Pier - 1984 Morton Salt Company Bulkhead. Manistee - 1984 Anchor In Expansion. Cheboygan - 1983 Mackinaw City State Dock - 1983 Marine Structure Design. Spokane. WA (knouff & Knouff) - 1983 State of Michigan Ice Pile Research - 1983 Harrisville Harbor Expansion - 1983 Flotation Docking, Sandusky Harbor - 1983 Flotation Docking, Grand Haven Design - 1983 Bois Blanc Island MOOT Dock Expansion - 1983 Cheboygan County Marina - 1983 Escanaba Marina • 1983 East Jordan Harbor - 1983 Sheboygan. HI Riverfront Development Phase II - 1983 Grand Haven Municipal Marina - 1983 Harborage Marina, Lake Charlevoix - 1983 Harbor Town, Boyne City - 1983 Presque Isle Harbor Development - 1983 Riverfront West, Detroit - 1982 Harbor Beach Development, Engineering - 1982 Cheboygan Lock Complex Hydraulic System - 1982 Mackinaw City Harbor De-Icing System - 1982 State of Michigan Ice and Marina Research - 1982 Procter 4 Gamble Hydro Power Development - 1982 Lake Huron Shoreline Stabilitation - 1982 Ice Boom Analysis for CRREL & Wausau Insurance Co., Oil City. PA - 1982 Lyon-Fisher Bulkhead - 1982 Harborage. Lake Charlevoix - 1982 Cross Village Breakwater and I'.arbor Development - 1^84 Detour Breakwater and Harbor Development - 1982 Ploechl's Marina. Bay City - 1982 Procter & Gamble Ice Control System - 1981 Cheboygan Dam Structural Evaluation - 1981 State of Michigan Ice Research - 1981 Flotation Docking Floating Scow - 1981 Harborage Mooring Facilities - 1981 Gosling Czubak Marina Design - 1981 St. Ignace Breakwater and Shore Stabilization - 1981 Shepler Marine Travel Lift - 1981 Ornond Beach. Florida (Briley Wild Assoc.) - 1981 - 1984 -3- smm0:^ir W-y I- ■ W-' 3'-t. ■y;<; K'X: ••■ e -r? ‘>v tdfe- UNITED DESIGN ASSOCIATES. INC. in NO. MAIN ST., CHEBOYGAN. MICH. i3721 >K. OePere. Wisconsin Mooring Facilites - 1981 Ludington Marina - 1980 Sheboygan, HI Riverfront Development - 1980 Walter Zarich Marina, Toledo, Ohio - 1980 Petoskey Municipal Marina - 1980 Erik Straub Marina Design Ice Testing, New Hamphsire - 1920 Mackinaw Island Yacht Club - 1980 State of Michigan Ice and Marina Research 1980 OePere. Wisconsin Voyager Park - 1980 Seneca Falls. N.Y. Coffer Dam - 1980 Procter A Gamble Erosion and Bulkhead Control - 1980 Bois Blanc Island Commercial Pier - 1980 Petoskey Municipal Dock Expansion - 1980 Mackinaw City "Welcome Mooring Facilities'* - 1979 East Jordan Harbor Development - 1979 State of Michigan Ice and Marina Research - 1979 St. Ignace Waterfront Development - 1979 Trenton Fishing Pier - 1979 Port of Monroe Bulkhead Design - 1979 State of Michigan Round Island Lighthouse Stabilization - 1979 Leeland Dam/Bulkhead Study - 1979 Port Austin - 1979 Cheboygan County Marina Phase II - 1979 Washburn, WI Marina Facilities - 1979 Detroit River Development Taubman Company - 1979 Elk Rapids Marina - 1979 Hessel Harbor Expansion - 1979 Mackinaw City Mooring - 1978 State of Michigan Ice 8 Marina Research 1978 Cheboygan Lock Hydraulic System - 1978 Bois Blanc Island Harbor Development - 1978 Marine City Bulkhead - 1978 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hammond Bay Research - 1978 Cheboygan Lock Hydraulics - 1978 Burt Lake Marina - 1978 Ontonagon Harbor • 1978 Cheboygan County Launching and Mooring Facilities • 1978 Anchor In Bulkhead - 1978 Mackinaw City Dredging - 1978 Harbor Springs Mooring Facilities - 1978 Reef Petroleum Man.nu - 1978 Mackinaw City Dredge- - 1977 Convention and Exp : r. Center and Marina. Paducah. KY - 1977 United McGill Pier Design - 1977 Corps of Engineers Testing and Research, Hammond Bay Harbor - 1977 AuGres Mooring Facilities, Bureau of Facilities - 1977 Bois Blanc Island Causeway - 1977 Mackinaw City Marina Expansion - 1977 -4- .'V’ ■■ UNITED DESIGN ASSOCIATES. INC. in NO. WAIN ST.. CHEBOYGAN. MICH. 49721 fe1 •> II Shore Stabilization. Millard Seiberling - 1977 Boyne City Harbor Development - 1977 Lakeshore Yacht Club, Muskegon - 1977 Marquette Harbor Development - 1977 Petoskey Harbor Dredging - 1977 Elm Street Boat Launching, Cheboygan - 1977 Round Island Lighthouse Breakwater - 1977 Cheboygan Lock & Dam Complex - 1977 Sault Ste. Marie Marina Development - 1977 United Auto Workers Marina Development - 1976 City of Petoskey Marina Development - 1976 Harbor Springs Mooring Facilities Development - 1976 St. Ignace Mooring Facilities Development - 1976 Harbor Springs Pier Replacement - 1976 HUO Coastal Development - 1976 Cedarville Mooring Facilities - 1976 Hessel Breakwater - 1976 Bois Blanc Island Pier Design - 1976 Cheboygan Mooring Facilities - 1976 Collington Harbor, North Carolina - 1976 Harbor Development, Manistique - 1976 St. Mary's River Ice Doom (Corps of Engineers) - 1975 Boyne City Harbor Development - 1975 Ontonagon Harbor Development - 1975 Harb-ir Springs Pier Design - 1975 Harr^sville Harbor Siltation Measurement - Cheboygan River Crossing - 1975 State of Michigan Ice and Marina Research Launching and Mooring Facilities. Muskegon - 1974 Round Island Lighthouse Development - 1974 Riverfront Stabilization. Manistee - 1974 Cheboygan Harbor Development - 1974 Bois Blanc Island Causeway - 1974 Mackinaw City Harbor Development - 1974 Benton Harbor Mooring Facilities - 1974 Pentwater Mooring Facilities - 1974 Ludington Mooring facilities - 1974 DahPonWan Harbor, Taiwan. ROC - 1974 U.S. Coast Guard Mooring Facilities, Cheboygan - 197 Detroit Bulkhead Improvements, Sigmund Blum - 1974 Manistique Harbor Development • 1974 East Jordan Launching and Mooring Facilities - 1974 Harrisville Harbor Development • 1974 1975 - 1974 Sault Ste. Marie Marina Development Cheboygan Lock & Dam Complex - 1973 Charlevoix Mooring Facilities - 1973 Timbercroft Marina Sault Ste. Marie - Cheboygan Bulkhead (St. of Michigan) 1974 -5- S&iML. ’**4 > ...pSp;-' p'- • • r*^*‘ P^\'W- V’- fev^'.- 1. > L,v' rv I -f‘ . r* ■/•i. p. S- "'. ■ ' fl UNITED DESIGN ASSOCIATES. INC. Ill NO. MAIN ST.. CHEBOYGAN. MICH. 49721 Harbor Springs Launching Facilities - 1973 Whitefish Point Harbor (St. of Michigan) 1973 State of Michigan Ice i Marina Research - 1972 Detroit Renaissance Bulkliead (John Portman Assoc.) - 1972 Hanistique Launching Facilities - 1972 Boyne City Shoreline Stabilization - 1972 Ontonagon Hooring/Travel Lift Facilities - 1972 Ontonagon Harbor Study - 1972 Bois Blanc Township Harbor Development - 1972 Clark Township Mooring Facilities - lS/2 The Landings. Lake Charlevoix - 1972 Whitefish Harbor Development - 1971 Hanistique Harbor Development - 1971 Shepler’s Marina - 1971 St. Ignace Mooring Facilities (St. of Mich) 1970 Michigan Waters Development. Ludington - 1970 Great Lakes Gas Company, Straits of Mackinac Crossing - 1970 Harrisville Harbor Development - 1970 Petoskcy Launching Facilities - 1970 Sutton's Bay Harbor Development - 1969 Waterways Navigation Bois Blanc Island - 1969 Cast Jordan Harbor Development - 1969 Cheboygan Launching Facilities ■ 1969 Black River Harbor, Ironwood (Oeot. of Interior) - 1963 United Auto Workers Mooring and Launching Facilities - 1965 Rogers City Harbor Development - 1968 Boyne City Harbor Development - 1968 Harbor Point Breakwater - 1966 Michigan Waterways Commission Breakwater - 1966 Petoskey Harbor Development - 1966 U.S. Coast Guard, St. Ignace - 1965 Port Austin Harbor Development - 1965 Marine City Bulkhead Design - 1965 Mackinaw City Mooring and Launching Facilities - 1965 Hammond Bay Harbor Development (St. Mich) - 1964 Bay Harbor Development - 1964 Rogers City Mooring Facilities • 1964 Charlevoix Bulkhead Design - 1963 Marine Adivers Inc., San Francisco, CA - 1963 Grand Marais Harbor (St. of Mich) - 1963 Marineland Development - 1962 Charlevoix Launching Facilities - 1962 Corps of Engineers Breakwater Consultations - 1961 Rogers City Harbor Refuge - 1961 Mackinaw Island St, Part Commission - 1960 Indian River Marina - I960 Naubinway Marina Development - 1960 Corps of Engineers Marine Consultants - 1958 Pointe Aux Pins, Bois Blanc Island - 1957 Abitibi Steel Sheet Piled Bulkhead Develooment - l?:o Cheboygan River (Cores of Enginee'-s) • 19^_o »• * ... T ^l-iL Fabyanskc , Svoboda . Westra , D avis & Hart A pPOrc55»ONAj. A3SOC»aT!On o. c* NAflT M.T. OCAALO t. »vooPOA I4AMH w. WC1TP4 HOtCAV W. OAVift. HAAM c . ACTCPCOW JCi^CMIAH J. r CAPNCV OCMNIft J. tllOdCM SCOTT LLOTO ANOCnSON PAUL t. AATCUC OSCOO^V T SPAtJ Of AN S.thONPOn OAST e.ciesON »£iO MIMNCOOTA wCHLO TRAQC ccrwrr® TMtwTv CAST PevCNTN SAifjT PAUL-MiMNeSOTA ssirn TCCCA mONC TCLCCO^'KM ■■ i I &fei m-: ■m-m.. iMt: w sm:. p.- IISO MINNEAPOLIS CtNTRC SIO SCeONO AVCNUC bOUIH M I NN CAPOUl 2 . M I NNCSQTA BS pO^: iKi.ft.AHO*«C AiA*A9P*0li9 TT< rroBfrit Ait«lJS-JCftV CARRii: A anecN OWfGHT O. PASUSC 1^ VtC C. MAPT JUOiTM c. >lROW 140* t.f A (9 *« AOT P/ Jt T. MCTCn OACOOPY O- OITTSICH PICHAPO a«JCHSKN THOMAS V.TOOCI CMAPtCf O. C A»»CNT kl< lu PtfIBVUVA M^NUklV MA«r aUC M.VOPPPtCH PuRC'' ▼O John P.noyle, •V • • If'-;.Boot t Flanagante.:/3500 IDS Center Augurit 6, 1992 Minn<aapol in 80 South 8th Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Thomas Darrett, Esq. Popham, Ha Ik, Schnobrich, Kaufman, Ltd. 3300 Pipor Jaffray 3'owor Minneapolis, MN 55402 Re: Willow Properties/npargn, et al. Gentlemen: I assume by now you have received a copy of Stephen Upgren's. Notice to exorcisio tne option on the balance of the property. I would like to schedule a closing with you during the week of Auguct 24, 1992. Obviously, I am aware that, your clients appear to dispute the existence of the Option Contract. However, I do want the record to be very clear that my clients are ready, willing and able to eloeo on the trancaction. DJT:ct If you do not have any intention wnatsoever of closing with ray clients, T would appreciate your courtesy of informing me of that fact. If you do intend to close, let me know of your availability during that week. Very truly yours, Oenris J. Trooien ce: Stephen Upgren Title Services, Inc. 1: if.ii'Pm- m*?,4 CITY OF HANOVER11250 ■ 5TH STREET N E HANOVER. MINNESOTA 5534 (612)497-3777 AU mL- ^ ^ Dear City Official: I wish to extend to you a Minnesota Cities’ regional Thursday! Septeaber 4th, at Street N.E. cordial invitation to attend the League of oeeting hosted by the City of Hanover on the Hanover City Hall located at 11250 5th The afternoon program, beginning at 2:30 p.m. will rover a variety of subjects during a roundtable disruasion, including solid waste programs, "what cities around the state are doing" and the new Transportation Utility Fee. At 3:30 p.m. a discussion will cover fire relief association activities and at 4:00 p.m. a presentation will address counci1/staff relations and the need for performance appraisals. Because of the importance of this subject the League is asking that at least one elected official from each city is present. The afternoon program, concluding at 5:00 p.m. will be followed by a social hour and then dinner at 6:15 p.m. Following a welcome to our city from myself, LMC President Larry Bakken will address the audience regarding the organization’s focus for the coming year. After the President’s message the League will present its new video followed by a discussion of legislative natters, including the status of the process to develop a new local government aid (LGA) formula. The meeting will conclude with door prizes, including a free registration to the 1993 annual conference in St. Cloud. To make reservations for your city, please return the enclosed registration form as soon as nossible. In case of cancellations, please notify City Clerk Susan Vergin of any cancellations billed for those who di^ not attend and by the cancellation date. Your city will be did not cancel their reservations 1 look forward to seeing you on Thursday, September 4th. Sincerely yours. Maxine Ladda Mayor of the City of Hanover ML/siv f'.%P"^- P:. :P ■ ^:V •/A w ■ .VCITY OF HANOVER 11250 - 5TH STREET N E HANOVER. MINNESOTA 55341 (612)497-3777 REGISTRATION FORM WE WILL HAVE CITY OFFICIALS ATTENDING THE REGIONAL MEETING IN HANOVER AND WE AGREE TO PAY FOR THESE MEALS UNLESS THE HOST CITY IS NOTIFIED OP ANY CHANGES BY AUGUST 28TH. NAMES / TITLES OP PERSONS ATTENDING: PERSON MAKING RESERVATIONS: CITY:PHONE: _i 1 •NUMBER OP ATTENDEES X $10.00 REGISTRATION FEE = NUMBER OF ATTENDEES X $ 9.75 PRICE OF DINNER = *($10.00 REGISTRATION FEE APPLIES ONLY TO THE FIRST TEN REGISTRANTS) TOTAL PAYMENT ENCLOSED PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE CITY OF HANOVER aND RETURN WITH REGISTRATION PORN TO: SUSAN VERGIN, CITY CLERK 11250 5TH STREET N.E. P.O. BOX 278 HANOVER, NN 55341 ►I.. l‘r !vi 7 t‘, ’ 7^' li'' <-:.Er ■■ <V l: V ft--:. Wr. • rr- i"- iu5'-f!'- i- '^K '-. V 7 k ♦' Y Of HANOVER 2'^-'^ ■ BTH STREET N E i . . IVt MINNESOTA 55341 (d12) 497-3777 wgf.' m‘K4^:on f.«m VK WILL HAVE cm’ OFFK ’TENDING THE REGIONAL MEETING IN HANOVn Al® « TO PAY FOR THE:‘ *(£ALS UNLESS THE HOST CITY IS NOTIFIED OF ANY CHANGES BY AUGUST 28TH. NAMES / TITLES OF PERSONS ATTENDING: PERSON MAKING RESERVATIONS: CITY;PHONE: ( *NUNBER OP ATTENDEES X $10.00 REGISTR.\TION FEE s IIUMKB OF ATTENDEES X $ 9.75 PRICE OF DINNER = A(|10«00 REGISTRATION FEE APPLIES ONLY TO THE FIRST TEN REGISTRANTS) T‘TAL PAYMENT ENCLOSED $ PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAY.\BLE TO THE CITY OF HANOVER AND RETURN WITH REGISTRATION FORM TO SUSAN VEROIN, CITY CLERK 11250 5TH STREET N.E. P.O. BOX 278 HANOVER, MN 55341 i*r ' »• 'i A. League of Bfinnesota Cities 183 University Ave. East St Paul, MN 55101-2526 (612) 227-5600 (FAX: 221-0986) W- : 1" Kiv I I-’-. Ir fel- hk*. if y. a. j/'-^5- eM' ■{v' Hr !■■ KJ- :.; •• jy» AftTnoon Program 2:30 “ 3:15 p.n 3:15 - 3:30 p.n. 3:30 - 4:00 p.n 4:00 - 5:00 p.n. 5:00 - 6:15 p.n 6:15-7:00 p.n ' Evninq Program - 7:15 p.n7:00 7:15 - 7:30 p.n. - 7:45 p.n7:30 7:45 - 8:45 p.n. 8:45 - 9:00 p.n. isiS. 1992 League of Minnesota Cities Regional Meeting Program Round Table Discussion -Solid Waste Programs What cities around the state are doing New state mandates -Transportation Utility Fee BREAK Relief Association Activities -Spending Relation Association funds What's legal, what isn't -Mayors and city clerks role in Relief Associate )Tt activities Council/Staff Relations -Performance appraisals Social Hour Dinner Welcome, Host City Mayor LMC President's Message — Larry Bakken Mayor, Golden Valley LMC Video on city spending Local Government Aid (LGA) Discussion Legislative Candidates — Questions 6 Answers Registration Prize Draving/Close i;' mm4 gaamUtSiM. I AKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT '; 1 August 6, 1992 TOs Environment Committee FROM:Chair JoEIlen Hurr SUBJt Cancellation of August 11, Imschedule to September 15, 1992 meeting, 1992 T 1 ^ O 7 :992 Work la continuing on organizing the prograin to begin Lake monitoring for water quality. Since there is still more to be done before a full draft of the plan can be prepared for the Environment Committee, the August 11 meeting will be cancelled, with the next meeting set for Tuesday, September 15, at 8:30 am, Wayzata City Council Chambers. Your thoughts on identifying people to participate in the water quality monitoring subcommittee activities are encouraged to be passed^on to chair Dick Osgood, 449~0092, or JoEllen, 47l~980l. Thank you for being alert to other environmental issues which may be brought forward to the comm.ttee as additional business. If you want a particular item placed on the agenda please call JoEIlen, or Gene Strommen at the LMCD office, 473-7033. Have a great Labor Day Holiday! r'-'.i'n-. .1 I' U'r K.-' I & * i-'“ i-T ‘ ir-i • r:f:’ >■: r*- “ I fc Lm-ia LAKE niNNETf NKA CONSERVATION DISTRIC'^ Data Gathering and Standards Subcommittees AGENDA 7:30 Pn, Wednesday, August 12, 1992 Norwest Bank Wayzata Conference Room 135 1, Introductions and welcome. Task Force Chair Grathwol; 2. 3. 4. 5. 7. Review of additions and amendments to 1986 parking space standards as identified at the 7/15/92 meeting oi the Data Gathering and Standards Subcommittees, and presented in the 7/15/92 subcommittee minutes, provided. Car/traiier and car parking space evaluation of existing public < ccess parking lots, in light of amended 1986 parking space .tandards, conducted by Kimball, DNR, with participation of Hennepin County and LMCD. Data update on car/traiier parking inventory taking into consideration outcome of staff review of existing public access parking lo«s, to be presented at the meeting. Pinal review of supplemental recommendations, one through three, as reported on page 2 of 7/15/92 subcommittee minutes, for presentation to full Task Force. 6. Additional business. Setting of date for full Lake Access Task Force meeting in September (proposing Wednesday, the Ifath). 8. Adjournment £it.A ■ .if. III.E't l;.« * {-.• f;: 1?^r- ifc % 0 M f 5- ■ i -V k r^P ft:: fo. r k & ItMl!'m-t.rI •* LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Lake Access Task Force Data/Parking Standards SubconiniiUecs JOINT MEETING SUM\URY Wednesday, July 15, 1992; 7:30 p.m. LMCD Offices, Wayzata, MN AttPindance Members: Jim Grathwol, Chair (LMCD); Ron Moorse (Orono); Gordon Kimball (DNR); Scott Carlson (Minnctrista/LMCD); Gary Larson (MN State B.A.S.S. Fed.); Gabriel Jabbour (Orono); Gene Strommen (LMCD); Tom Reese (Mound); John Schneider (MSC)Observers:Scott Mann(Mann Real Estate ' ;Jon Linne (LMCD Inteni) Preliminaries Don Buckhout acted as facilitator for the meeting. He reviewed the subcommittee groundrules and all in attendance w’ere introduced. The members reviewed the summary of the June 18 meeting and found it to be complete and accurate. Presentation of Task Assignments Talk 3; Gabriel Jabbour presented aerial photographs of the public access sites around the Mr. Jabbour and other members commented on the various features and Umitations of each site. In some cases opportunities for improvements or expansion of parking c?.pacity either on or off>site were noted. For the Spring Park site, it was noted that a service station near the county DOT garage may be available for acquisition as an off-site parking lot. For the Wayzata site, it wa: noted that it may be desirable to explore with the BN Railroad the possibility of making improvements to tlic site. Task 1; Gordon Kimball presented his analysis of the configuration of parking spaces at existing access sites. He iilso supplied an e.xcerpt Irom the DNR design manual that shows various configurations for access ramp, driveways, and parking. It was noted that at the Spring Park access there is a large building across the street in poor repair and some currently undeveloped land nearby that could possibly be available for redevelopment as off-site access parking. Mr. Kirnball noted that the DNR has not formally requested redesign of any of the access site parking areas at this time. Task 2: Gene Strommen and Jon Linne reported on their analysis of the potential on street parking availability (per handouts). The "street" categor>' means currently available on-street car-trailer parking. The "potential" category means space- that arc physically suitable for on-street parking but that are currently posted no-parkin^r^e Otherwise unavailable. The final total considering on-loi and on-street out to 2000 feet from this analysis is 845 spaces, as shown on the summary sheet. Dprinirinn of Reliable pafkine Spaces Starting from the 1986 parking space standards, the committee agreed upon the following additions and amendments to these standards to define reliable parking. !(•, ■ ■Y.F.V:-h - ""r-f/i r.l h • t X-. • r"' Ns fV hf >:■ * fe “v,S’>,-.• • ---!■, -I . •:^ M. i* m’"'-i: ,„ i^nc; >' ' IS-' §■ IS.r?':'.m, £f?’ ^•• ‘ ■ hfc pr m- ii-t^'. ;.w y>- 1 i M- Any off-site spaces must be available for at least 3 years, with 5 years more desirable. Witfiin that time of availability, if any designated spaces need to be removed they must be replaced with comparable spaces. Parking spaces between 1500 and 2000 feet from the ramp can only be considered reliable ’f temporary boat mooring is available at the ramp site for a number of boats equal to 10 percent of the parking spaces between 1500 and 2000 feet. Signs ^ access sites informing users about off-site parking need to be consolidated to reduce sign clutter, made aesthetically attractive, and able to be inexpensively updated to reflect changing conditions. Vehicle-only spaces (no trailer) on public access parking lots can be counted toward the total goal ■'f 700 car-trailer spaces provided that the number of such spaces counted for any given lot does not exceed 10 percent of the total number of spaces on that lot. (Example: Out of 50 total parking spaces on a lot, 7 are for vehicle only. Only 5 of the 7 may be counted toward the goal of 700 (i.e. 10% of 50 =* 5). Parking space minimum size standards (in feet): Vehicle only: 9X19 (HDCP 12X19) Car trailer: On-lot 10X40 On-street 10X50 On-lot designated trailer parking on grass is acceptable if vehicle is parked on graded/pa v^ surface. Of the total non-designated (non-signed) on-.street parking spaces, only 75 percent are considered to be reliable in order to account for non-access related public parking. Supplemental Recommendations The committee agreed on the following supplemental recommendations to be forwarded to the full Task Force: The subcommittee assumed as valid and recommends for continuation the 700 total car-trailer spaces and the allocation of those spaces by zone. iof The subcommittee finds and recommends to the task force that the current allocation and distribution of parking spaces for the lake is not equitable. All cities have to make a concerted effort to provide their share of lake access parking spaces. The subcommittee encourages coordination and joint cooperation among cities to meet zone goals. te,. Tasks and Next MeetingThe subcommittee requested the staffs of LMCD and tlie DNR to evaluate the existing access parking lots to recommend possible improvements in keeping with the subcommittee's recommended standards.The sulKommittce set the next meeting for August 12 at 7:30 p m. for the purpose of reviewing the results of the above-referenced analysis and the final subcommitteereconuneiidations. Re^ctfuUy submitted, Don Buckhout Subcommittee Facilitator |||i»^'" "m0r' '■ ■'p>.1^■!» ‘ ^ - , * «•'•: A 2 \lJVnJMMiHAHA CSSEK WATERSHED DISTRICTft P.O. Box 387, Wayzata. Minnesota 55391 p^vijSP MMfiBIS: James R Somswy Pfes • Joiw £. Thomas • Richarc ^ M»«ter fHb9t 0. Enclcsofi • C Woodrow Lovt • ciarVscKi Lmdley • Thomas M^H c pi: i:r'. W' P' rr-?,. ..i ► 'ik^S -■ ■ ft: - FISANCE COMMITTEE MEETING 6:00 p.to. Thursday, August 13, 1992 Wayzata City Hall Wayzata, Minnesota AGENDA A Work on 1993 Budget 87 IDAJ te-'■ .M-", ■ M tti«st hMMpin human servi 4100 vemon avenue south. 920-5533 |s<;= ii# # f •>■:'••■'. » h m ‘^Siir-M'-‘Strm- ■V' ,'l -i V ^ ‘■■r ',r,-T m i '.jf* 11 sj \J \ ^ ^ 1993 Funding Request to the City of Orono The West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board is requesting funding support from the City of Orono for its 1993 operating budget. Our request is for $1,603 at the rate of 22 cents per capita based on 1990 Census figures of 7,285. The 22 cents is the same rate we requested for 1992. We have appreciated the support of our member municipalities. It has been essential to us in order to be able to provide direct services such as energy assistance, emergency services, and energy conservation programs. In addition it allows us to plan and advocate for human service .leeds of the residents of our member cities and for services being provided on a decentralized basis in local communities. We also work to bring a fatier share of human service tax dollars back into our communities. We realize the squeeze on loc continuing commitment to us. Enclosed is some background information about West Hennepin Human Services. If you need more specific information, please contact Marcy Shapiro or Bruce Larson of our staff. Thank you. .i • • ;•.*;>■f^-.ipr-r-- :■■ ■■-: i2 rSVfe- DIRECT SERVICES PROVIDED IN ORONO BY WEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES PLANNING BOARD y 6 V>.'.i\ ■-. al>^w m^r,. r ASSISTANCE (1991-1992 Program Year): Number of Individuals Heating Assistance Amount Paid $ 5,265.00 .T^y._ _ SERVICES (1991): NusJ:>er of Individuals Assistance Paid 21 $ 17,689.00 fe-v 'tH-' ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM pv-Number of Households Value of Services W:‘my Total § households served in prograun 390.00 gw-. -V 1991 § served 260.00 i'u ■ Wi" «'V ‘4 . . ..*V^ ,'^-v V-■* mm-. m" 'S-. . ■; t »'' ■r-" }’r. •-' t .;vv,.^ • r'i-. ■V--- ,1 - ir, * > ,=:- f >■ ^ft m Fi.- .=^-‘- ■ .- • - ;; , MEMBERSHIP BENEFITS i O MUNICIP ALITIFS The Planning Board^s p^imu^y activitiesrelate to planning, research, coordinating, and, in general, advocating for the municipalities of West Hennepin County. The Planning Board provides the following services to its member municipalities: a method for citizens,providers, and municipal represent County human services decision-making. to be involved in Hennepin information about human sei .'ice needs .md programs leadership in the community for the effectivi mobilization of community resources to meet human service needs staffingassistanceto the municipalities in areas of their involvement in human services as they may request it a referral system for citizens with human services needs and/or problems (i.e. elderly, mentally ill, )outh, etc.) staffingassistanceto community groups who want to organize a human services planning effort to meet specific needs or problems the capability to do research on human service issues and needs planning staff to participate in regional and county human services planning activitieson behalf of the municipalities an avenue to bring county-wide services and programs into our local communities in order to provide better access to our citizens assurance that efforts are being made to coordinate the planning of human services delivery systems and to deter unnecessary duplication of services the ability to make presentations on and provide information about human services needs and delivery systems in the area the means to develop leadership and interest on the part of citizens to be involved in htiman services a way to communicate the concern of the municipalities regarding human service issues to the providers and involved citizens of the area In general, to be available to the municipalities in areas whe^e human services expertise is required. In addition, we provide direct services to the citizensof each municipality in the following areas: • energy conservation (Home Energy Check-jps) • energy assistance • emergency food, shelter, clothing fund Mazebusters - a program to aid low income, single parent families to move towards self- sufficiency - SI ■ ■ ; 'I- \ ' .,S; i., 4'V w. ^■- i I &Vll€^iA■ wwmmm I s west heimepin human services plonning board vemon avenue south, st. louis park, minnesota 55416 920>5533 WEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES PLA^^NIN G HOARD '-i- ■fe &M..p u m > M t- W' iv m- Vr' iS’- ; rl ■ar -M. % i'-'I? West Hennepin Human Services ‘''anning Board (WHHS) acts mainly as a planning and coordinating agency through which citizens are a part of the decision-making process in delivering needed health and social services for the 219 square mile West Hennepin area. It provides education, consultation and technical assistance on issues pertaining to human service delivery systems. It provides linkages betvw en governmental units, consumers and service providers; increases awareness of available human service resources; identifies and advocates for needea services and improvements of the existing services system; and assists others in the development of human services programs. WHHS also coordinates the delivery of services when there is no other agency to do it. Oui* work in the Emergency Services Program, the House Doctor/Project AIR/Home Energy Check-up Program, and the Energy Assistance Program are examples of this. We are working to promote programs such as the Community Energy Council programs that tie the needs of municipal efforts with those of human services. WHHS is the only agency providing these planning and coordinating services to the West Heiuiepin area. We rely heavily on the involvement of volunteers to maximize cost effectiveness and increase citizen involvement. We view ourselves as an advocate for the residents of our member cities. We work to make services more accessible on a decentralized basis and get a fair share of human tax service dollars back into our communities. This effort is critical for suburban residents to have equal opportunity and access to services as do their urban o jnterparts. We also work for the establishment of new or exoanded services when a neec is documented through our research and needs assessment process. PROGRAMS AND SERVICES Energy Assistance Program There are tvMsnty^fi« decentralized intake sites operated by WHHS which area residents can apply for the Energy Assistance Program. During the 1991-1992 Energy Assistance Program, the following assistance was received by residents of Suburban Hennepin County th ough WHHS. The 1991-92 program year ended May 1, 1992. 4,394 Suburban Hennepin households (th's Is 12,918 individuals) applied for heating assistance from our program. $1,218,086 of heating grants was distributed to Suburban Hennepin residents; $64,000 fr- crisis heating assistance and 48,946 for energy-related repair. fe:--'> Jr ' tef : ^ i: v^<r Emergency Services WHHS received Hennepin County funds for emergency food, shelter, clothing and transportation services. The program is delivered in cooperation with Interchurch Community Association, Interfaith Outreach, St. Louis Park Emergency Program and Westonka Community Action Network as well as Home Free Shelter, Sojourner Shelte.- and 12 area police departments. In 1991, a total of $101,232 served 3,181 West Hennepin residents with food, 490 with shelter and rent, and 372 with clothing and other needs. Energy Conservation Programs We provide the Project AIR/House Doctor (weatherization and audit program) and Home Energy Check-up Programs in 30 suburban cities. As part of these, we also have local Community Energy Councils to provide citizens advice to each program. This is funded by utilities and the State of Minnesota. Directory of Services 40,000 copies of our mini-directory of human serviv.es have been distributed. We publish two combination directories and how to guides: "Basic Tools: A Survival Skills Guide for the Unemployed and Underemployed" and "Home Sweet Home: A Guide to Help Find Affordable Housing." We also publish directories for clients of our Emergency Services Program and our Energy Assistance Program. Information and Referral We do an average of about 100 information and referral calls per month. Mazebusters Mazebusters is an empowerment program for low income parents on AFDC in the W est Hennepin Suburban area. It was funded by the McKnight Foundation as part of their Families in Poverty Initiative. Participants in the program, "Mazebusters" are trained as peer counselors and information and referral specialists. Their job is to assist low income people in accessing available services. We are currently seeking funding to continue the program.. Suburban Head Start Task Force This task force has as its goal to make Head Start available to suburban Hennepin residents. Since its inception, the number of Head Start kids coming from the suburbs has doubled, and for many western Hennepin communities, services are being provided in a more accessible way. West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board worked with suburban legislators to successfully gain funding for suburban Head Start and to begin the Learning Readiness Program. Service Coordination We provide assistance to a number of service coordination groups including: Emergency Service Providers, Mental Health Aftercare Providers, West Metro Interagency Transition Committee, West Suburban Interagency Early Intervention Committee, and Teens Alone. fvV t 4- Hr. 'ff*: tm rW. K:jc itslift » f i-v' w . Ril^ Homing Advocacy Project We are iw>rking to make affordable housing a Tone burner" issue in the suburbs through participation in coalition, actiie advocacy and providing leadership in efforts to promote affordable housing in suburban Hennepin. This year we establish "Community Builders,” a low income housing development corporation. Legislative Agenda We have a legislative agenda of eight categories and provide extensive staff time to working on these issues. We work with and provide leadership to a number of coalitions on these issues. This past ^ar we were concerned about local government aid cuts and the impact on local delivery of services. Community Education Services WHHS conducts a variety of activitiesto inform the community of area human service needs, issues and availability Specific activitiesinclude information and referral calls, letters of support (aftercareful evaluation), technical assistance to area agencies and presentations to area community groups on issues such as human service resources, legislation, emergency needs and our service priority reports. |(^#yi»-»tjtihUitvof Services WHHS advocates with decision makers such as Hennepin County and the State of Minnesota to provide servi > h. a decenuaiized format to the residents of the West Hennepin County. This effort is CT.^icairor suburban residents to have equal opportunity and accessto services as do their urban count** parts. We also work for the establishment of new or expanded services when a need is documented through our research and needs assessment process. Examples of specific pro gram development resulting from the past efforts of WHHS include: Community Action fcr Suburbeo Hennepin (CASH) which has brought in $250,000 of federal and state anti*, /erty funds; Bridge West which provides crisis housing for youth; West Hennepin Community center for Mentally Handicapped Citizens; Domestic Abuse Intervention projects in sev^al West Hennepin Cities: the MEED State Jobs Program; the Project AIR and Home Energy Check-up energy conservation programs; four suburban residential treatment programs for chronically mentally ill people; a food co-op in St. Louis Park; County and Federal funding for Emergency Service Program; the suburban federally funded Energy Assistance Program; Senior Health screening programs; Metro W est Coordinated Transportation Project; Hennepin County Drug Abuse Prevention Center; parenting education programs in a number of school districts;Parer.ts Anonymous group; suburban detox programs; and decentralized county programs such as the Ridgedale Community Center. In addition, we have effectively advocated with Hennepin County for continued funding of programs such as Pyramid Mental Health Center and Emplo yment Action Center. v'v , .\<f^r-'^^^ i.v^.ijj™.-.!^.-.'■T'-'r “- -r-7 r ’^:5>^'Tr^ - 'i,t;- *.-. V ’%/ • -'^**v:a:4€';^fe%rfea -, a. Community Social Services Act Process -•* V. Tht Community Social Services Act Process varies from \ear-t0-3ear depending upon the opportunities available for the gathering and analysis of data. The process by which the 1990 service priorities weie formulated included the participation of hundreds of people. Specific activitiesincluded: pj'A review of local research including a local analysis of a County-wide Food Shelf Survey A needs assessment of West Hennepin residents An in-depth needs assessment of women coming out of treatment Survey of area service providers on diversity A randcHn survey of 600 Hennepin County residents on human service funding and taxation issues Presentation of findings, priorities and issues to the Hennepin County Community Services management team and United Way planning department Focus group interviews on: ta;es and human service funding; the Working Poor; families with children in early childhood programs Monitoring the Hennepin County budget Release of two reports This >ear WHHSPB is doing a special project funded by the Carolyn Foundation to implement a Citizen Jury on the Hennepin County budget. This is a new method of citizen participation which utilizes randomly selected citizens in the process. iil[ IfidffiicaLAaaigtaDse We provide technical assistance to an average of 10-15 agencies and organizations per month. Advisory Committees - p We serve on a number of advisory committees to provide a link to area services, teer Hours Nai*.-fl-;; ''d During 1990, 12,000 volunteer hours were donated to WHHS Area Energy Assistance, the Board of Directors and Citizen Participation process. c '' ’A*: f -'r, iy. ::‘a •; ^■'8' • M ■■ ' ■^'iHip.;«■ .tJ Ai J;'V < V ^ '> " • i;ff>>:v :tiy.m0^ M;-K^ - 0W-\r-' r^' lLf&m;ajw.r-, tei.11^ ^5 '. ~^1ir West liennepin Human Services [>lannin£( Ecard Annual ••: Hi£|tili£|hts June, 1991 to July, 1992 p ‘ *' **-- ' ^-!r * •-j r* e'- ■•V - §M, h£-^ ^->- K'i/: .15 '-r' ifcf:^ #-.■ P?*VI>, mm.'r^^: \ '•^*'' *•' ' •'■• ^1 WHHS conducted the firsi-in*the-narion Citizens Jury on a governmental budget. Twenty four citizens representing the adult population of Hennepin County held hearings, toured facilities, and deliberated various aspects of the County’s budget. Their findings were released at a press conference on September 30, 1992. A report called "West Hennepin Citizen Input on Community Service Priorities and Issues for 1993 “ was presented to Hennepin County Community Service Managers. A new aspea of this report was to include the personal stories of west suburban residents who need human services. WHHS was an initiator and key technical advisor for The Minneapolis Foundation’s commissioned study: "Citizen’s Tools: The Search for Flexibility in Hennepin County s Finances." WHHS formed a partnership this year with the Urban Coalition. The partnership is to implement a project called the "Customers Voice ’ which has been funded by the Minneapolis Foundation. The program will explore methods to systematically involve consumers in the evaluation and design of services. The project will experiment with several methods in 1992-93. A survey that collected data on runaway and homeless youth in West Hennepin was developed at WHHS. All 9th and 12th graders in the six V est Hennepin area public school districts participated in the survey. In February, WHHS conducted focus groups involving over 20 laid-off professionals who are age 50 and over. This is a growing segment of the population due to corporate mergers, acquisitions, and down-sizing. WHHS is continuing to meet with members of the focus groups to design innovative ways for them to return to the job market. WHHS released a report on what happens to family reunification efforts when an AFDC parent gets chemical dependency treatment and the children are placed in foster ^e. report is based on a project that WHHS conducted that provided funding to reunite families and was funded by C.A.S.H. The report was released at a community meeting. Rep. Karen Clark agreed to pursue waivers of federal regulations that currently prevent family reunification. WHHS conducted an in-depth study on employment and wage trends in suburban Hennepin from 1978-1988 that revealed that suburban Hennepin is suffering from a "hidden depression" in which the skyrocketing employment growth the suburbs experienced during the 1980 ’s. This trend was offset by a shift toward low-wage industries, resulting in a growing number of working persons seeking assistance from area services to meet their basic needs. The report was featured as a lead article in the Star Tribune newspaper and WCCO Radio. 1 •k^i A. Y . . <' .•V 5W" |-r^v'^y-' ^ . 1 ”^. t5jij!.;|.^- . .. .: ,A r The rise in the number of working poor persons in suburban Hennepin is a growing concern because WHHS believes that the well being of workers, their families, our communities and our economy are inextricably linked. In un attempt to address the root problems facing the working poor, WHHS has received planning money from the Northwest Area Foundation to initiate a research and collaboration effort to develop a model for business innovation and restructuring. The project is called Creative Innovations in Business, and its goals would be to upgrade jobs, restore wage and income growth and make a contribution towards putting the Minnesota economy on a high-skills, high-wage path. WHHS completed two additional studies as pan of the Working Poor project. The first. "Community Development Block Grants in Suburban Hennepin, 1987-1990" detailed the trends in the amounts and use of CDBG funds in suburban Hennepin. The second report, “Establishing Community Development CoT^orations in Suburban Hennepin: Creating Economic Development Strategies and Successful Businesses," examined the potential for the community development corporation model as a strategy for suburban Hennepin economic development. WHHS is providing assistance to the newly-formed West Hennepin chapter of the .MN Senior Federation - Metropolitan Region.* Attendance at quarterly general meetings averages 300 people. WHHS has been working with the Meadowbrook Action Committee, a St. Louis Paik neighborhood group, to ^Ifill their mission to develop and facilitate program which promote the empowerment of low-income families and individuals toward economic self- sufficiency. The Committee received a $50,000 grant from Hennepin County in February to run a program to employ unemployed residents in neighborhood maintenance and development projects. Developed a legislative agenda for the 1992 session and advocated at the legislature for the items in agenda categories of initiatives in the agenda included children s issues, jobs, economic assistance; energy; food; housing; taxes and revenue; health care; mental health; criminal justice; lead abatement and transponation. Continued to be an active member of Jobs Now Coalition, a state coalition of 40 organizations, and to be their administrative and fiscal agent. WHHS continues to be an active advocate at the state and county level for the development of quality jobs. WHHS and the graduates of our Mazebusters Program advocated at the State Legislature for passage of a bill establishing Mazebusters pilot programs throughout the state. Th** legislation passed out of the Health and Human Services Policy Committees in both the House and Senate but did not receive the $350,000 necessary to implement the pilots. The Mazebuster's lobbying efforts were featured in the WCCO news segment, Eye on Minnesota. ■ ’-\0 ^ A.. - ii-'iM'-- I1-^ ■;■ r j’li. pi- iLmmk WHHS continued to be an advocate for the expansion of Head Start in the suburbs through Staff support of the Suburban Hennepin Head Start Access Committee. A new suburban site opened in Richfield and a site is being considered in the northwest suburbs. WHHS provided assistance to Senator Judy Traub in sponsoring a community meeting on the Learning Readiness Program. One of the most exciting events this year was a conference on May 18, 1992 that WHHS organized and sponsored: ’’Hate Crimes, Racism, Bigotry, Discrimination...T2ckling the Problems on the Front Lines. ‘ Attended by 240 people, the conference had as its keynote Federico Pefla, former Mayor of Denver, Colorado. The conference was partially funded by the Spring Hill Center Fund of The Minneapolis Foundation and was an opportunity for people from suburban Hennepin to understand the eff ;cts of racism in our communities. The conference and the issues raised received v-idespread coverage from suburban media. In June of 1991, WHHS organized the Suburbar Hennepin Anti-Racism Committee. The committee has as its goal to provide leadership in undoing the erfects of racism in suburban communities. The committee has been very acti*e and has focused much of its attention oi* human rights commissions, racial incidents, and community education. In May, 1992, the report "Minnesota Governments: Human Rights and Diversity Sur\ey - Suburban Hennepin Report " was released. The report was co-sponsored by WHHS, the Suburban Hennepin Anti-Racism Committee, and the Lea^e of Minnesota Human Rights Comixiissions. A follow-up report covering the State of Minnesota will be released in August, 1992. The West Hennepin Mental Health Advisory' Committee is composed of consumers of mental health services, providers, and community members. They sponsored a very successful community forum in May for Mental Health Month; are surveying consumers of mental health services on service availability after hospitalization; surveying police departments about dealing with mental health crises; and have developed a speakers bureau. The West Hennepin Mental Health Advisory Committee in conjunction with the other suburban mental health advisory committees sponsored a legislative forum where consumers and family members told their own stories about dealing with mental illness and the system to suburban legislators. The Energy CENTS Coalition was brought together by WHHS in 1988 to address the energy needs of low income Minnesotans. It is a coalition of 34 low-income and energy organizations and is staffed by WHHS. Energy CENTS spearheaded a successful statewde lobbying effort and media campaign to prevent devastating cuts in the federal funding for the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program. Energy CENTS worked successfully for the expansion of fuel funds in Minnesota and the establishment of a statewide ^el lund. The coalition received a grant from the Headwaters Foundation to do community organizing on low-income energy issues. "wrriiir jf i .5 .! .. • ■ A”'"* ft' i#- ■n ■- psi:. Ta V '■ <^V JVS (t,. A •'< The Energy Assistance Program (EAP) serves suburban and rural Hennepin County. The program assists low income households in paying their home energy bills. EAP also has funds to assist low income homeowners with energy related repairs, such as fixing furnaces, replacing broken windows and doors, etc. WHHS has had increases in the number of households served in each of the last four years. From fiscal year ’88 to fiscal year ’92 applications rose in the suburban area by 16 percent. During this same time period applications statewide have decreased by 7 percent. For the 1991-92 heating season. Energy Assistance served 4,394 households comprised of 12,918 individuals. Applications in the suburban area increased by about one-half percent, while statewide applications declined by 5 percen:. Because of transportation difficulties in suburban Hennepin, WHHS has continued to operate the Energy Assistance program using over 20 decentralized sites. This is made possible through the assistance of approximately 60 volunteers who generously contribute over 4,000 hours per heating season. We have also published 4 issues of "Helping Hands" a quarterly newsletter for low income residents of suburban Hennepin County. Because of delays in the funding for EAP this year WHHS was able to raise emergency funds for a small number of households and 500 gallons of fuel oil was donated assisting 3 families who would have been without heat without this donation. In 1991, our Emergency Services Program provided food to 3,181 people; shelter and rent to 490 people; utility assistance to 326 people; clothing and prescription assistance to 46 people. This program is designed to provide assistance to people in crisis who are without other resources. It is a cooperative effort with STEP, Interfaiih Outreach, ..iterchurch Community Association, and Westonka Community Action Network. WHHS has been conducting an outreach campaign to west suburban police departments to inform them about the program and train them to provide emergency services after hours when the local provider is closed. The Home Energy Check-up Program is a residential energy audit service providing a quick practical assessment of home energy usage, hands on instruction about weatherization techniques, a discussion of sensible conservation investments, a kit of materials and a follow up visit or call. Northern States Power sponsors this program which is free to its residential customers. WHHS has provided 2000 residential energy conservation audits in over 18 suburban hennepin communities since January, 1991 and over 5,200 audits since the program start in 1986. Successfully applied to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for a 513,000 Capacity Building Grant to assist WHHS to more effectively address the housing needs of low income persons and families within its service area by establishing a nonprofit housing corporation and developing plans to create affordable housing for low income households. *: > • ^^f'4 :vwX'^*y; ?l'£\ i-r.. [^b^; :; «* n-V»| ■« .’^ -I m %, .fj.. Ife- nIs. -'5?- ,S:ii0A ■:p>’-irn^^'- .1*: ■,,»!•; . 0.i::*-r ’Mi'- : u\'» 0r;,l ' r^ ' ’^f'-;J,J s:V>> p^u^y ■ Founded Community Builders, a new nonprofit corporation established to provide long term affordable housing and economic opportunity for low income households. Established an informal agreement with Project in Pride for Living to jointly pursue the development of low income housing projects in our service area. WHHS assisted in obtaining funds from the special needs housing program of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency and acted as the general contractor using this $22,000 grant to rehabilitate a single family home to be used by homeless families as shelter. This project was a collaborative effort with the City of Hopkins and Simpson Transitional Housing. Collaborated with the City of Hopkins on a successful application to the department of housing and urban development for a $100,000 HOPE I Planning Grant to empower public housing residents in hopkins to become homeowners. This grant will be used to develop a resident organization, study the feasibility of homeownership, provide training and counseling for homebuying, identify ways to provide economic self-sufficiency and assess rehabilitation needs of housing to be purchased. WHHS obtained funding commitments from the private industry councils of Hennepin, Scott and Carver counties to support the development and printing of an updated edition of “Basic Tools: Survival Skills for the Unemployed and Underemployed". As pan of our efforts at providing coordination, WHHS actively participates in organizations and coalition. Some examples where staff are on the Board of Directors are the Minnesota Housing Partnership, the Minnesota Counril of Non-Profits, the Minnesota Council of Local Energy Officials, the Bridge, Employment Action Center, the Minnesota Community Action Association, etc. After a several year information gathering and vision development process, WHHS completed a five-year long range plan which will shape our direction and activities over the next five years. As part of this process we developed a values statement for the organization. The development of the long range plan was a participatory process with ideas gathered from many parts of the community. im., . mu- ■'■-mqfr-"«K ■"m'•.V *■f-JftS.-.' ikr:;.. Kf:'- /■'■■, - :f» ; K& ^ * ■ M‘^;w i>. ;• •is m fern WHHS has made a stronger effort this past year to get professional assistance with public relations. During our Citizen Jury Process, we were provided such a^istance by the Jefferson Center, and two public •’elations companies have donated time to specific projects during the year. WHHS hired Tom Helgeson, a public relations consultant to work with us on developing our agency image. The Board of Directors held its annual retreat and focused on diversity. As a result of the retreat, goals were set for internal action within WHHS as well as providing leadership in the Community. Attention was paid the past year to internal operations including revision of policies, such as the revision of the by-laws, financial policies, etc. The WHHS Board entered into a p lanning process to find a more accessible office space. j As part of our office space planning process, WHHS convened service providers to discuss co-location of services. We are in a process of exploring ways that agencies can locate together as well as be more closely linked in their work when they are at separate locations. ^ ■ frf^ - ■ IS::; :;V ■ fi .r-S.' . —' H ‘- f#'wv mm‘ ' si'’ MB I"! -' '•■^■mPf% y{ i4. r. • IV.. . ^• “3'a,'. ■ •V *■ i' ■ ■ , ^ - ■,' •* 'L rc-:u»tr- : -ViX;-'. 1991-1992 BOARD MEMBERS Frank Altman Dexter Andrews Florence Bogie Irene Bryant Therese Crisman Guy Detlefsen Pat Gray Linn Hammerlund Mary Hathaway Yale Hicks David Isle Eric Larrson Darcel Lewis Jan Levin Pat Mever Lew Rev. Dick Lundv Bob Maiooly Alecia McDonald-Cox Dr. James McDonough LaDean McWilliams Steve Mumma Michael Noble Grace Norris Kate Perkins Mary Perkins Sally Polk Amy Samuelson Dr. Dan Schumacher Laura Sissala Patty Strong Joy Tierney Arlo Vande Vegte Anita Vogel Rhonda Wilkens Dale Woodbeck STAFF Marcy Shapiro, Executive Director Bruce Larson, Assistant Director Lois Gunderson, Senior Planner Logan Sommers, Office Manager Bob Cameron, Accountant Erica Schmiel, Policy and Program Analyst Patty Ferguson, Assistant EAP Coordinator, Programmer/Analyst Lisa Cohen, Energy Assistance Director, Maaebusters Coordinator Bernard Turner, EAP Eligibility Technician Rita Williams, EAP Eligibility Technician Dian Whelan, EAP Eligibility Technician Dawn Kauffman, EAP Eligibility Technician Joanne Schmeltzer, EAP Phone Coordinator/Office Supervisor Barbara Ritchie, EAP Volunteer Coordinator Peter Brunsberg, Energ)' Conserv'ation Techrucian Jimmy Sparks, Energy Coiiservation Techrucian Greg Carlson, Energy Conservation Technician Bob Sauerer, Energy Conservation Technician 1 . VniM *J Sv.ii"fey"A special thank you to the following for financial or in-:<incl contributions which supported the activities of West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board during the past year: Hennepin County City of Deephaven ■■ City of Hopkins City of Independence City of Long Lake City of Maple Plain City of Medina Cty of Minnetonkaf- •t’-r , ^ I • Citv of Orono City of Plymouth City of Shorewood City of Spring Park • City of St. Louis Park City of Tonka Bay fc»'y:City of Wayzata I • Oty of Woodland i • Minnesota Department of Jobs and h 9 0 Training St. Louis Park Public Schools/ fc Cotnmuntty Education Department Carolyn Foundation Community .Action for Suburban Hennepin Minneapolis Foundation - Undesignated Funds: Spring Hill Center Fund Mirjiegasco .N'orthern States Power Minnesota Deoartment of Public Service A Federal Emergency Management .Administration Jefferson Center Formative Engineering Northwest .Area Foundation Gannett Foundation Headwaters Foundation U.S. Dept, of Housing and Urban Development Minnesota Hou.sing and Finance Agency Hennepin County Private Industry Council Carv'er Counr/ Private Industry Council Scott Countv' Private Industry' Council Wavzata Community Church Women ’s 0 * Fellowship -V Minnesota Coundl of Non-profits; Bremer Foundation; Center for Urban and Regional Affairs; Citizens Independent Bank St. Louis Park; Bill Clark Oil Company; Kisch Oil Company; KJaers lOtl; Local Oil; Midwest Gas Company; Natural Resources/Self Reliance Center; Rollins Oil tompany; Rettinger Brothers Oil; Sipe and Gray Oil Company; W. Gordon Smith Company; Waconia Farm Supply; William McCoy Petroleum; Wright Hennepin Electric; Monica Nassif of 5he Nassif Group; Rebecca Stack of Concept Communications; Larry Greenberg and Carol Jndschi; plus individuals who generously donated to our fuel fund. tev ■ ■ . smpy ■4:. N,.,. 3r•: i ■% I V I 1 '•i 1 ■:> 1J ■t, a i 'll 1% , • • •• ^ A ‘-4