The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07-27-1992 Council PacketW-'; .P ;>i .'U■■ [V^fe. f‘®!t;!* iim«»i sF ^''’^■ %‘r_ !<w; (#■'riIi 1‘i;. •»"■■ ' iV - ,1*/ PiJ&SSt v;"r i? “!» pf ';:■ : mm-' m. Si KB: 3f •'■ ■ MINUTES OF THE REGULA''^ J^ONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUL. 2/, 1992 ROl .U The Council met on the above date with the following members present: Acting Mayor j. Diann Goetten, Ccunciimembers Gabriel Jabbour, Mary Butler and Edward Callahan. Mayor Barbara Peterson was absent, the following represented the City staff: City AdminIstrator Ren Moorse, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, Building & Zoning AdminIstrator Jeanne Mabusth. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, City Attorney Kevin Staunton, City Engineer Glenn Cook, Assistant Chief of Police Gary Cheswtek, and City Recorder Teri Naab. Acting Mayor Goetten called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. (S1 I CONSENT AGENDA Butler added Items S3, 4, 5 and 7 and removed Items tl3 and 14. Goetten removed Item #22. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to approve the Content Agenda as amended. Ayes 4, nays 0. Notions for all items adopted by consent agenda will be included in the minutes in their respective numerical order. (*«2) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Butler, secor'^ej by Callahan, to approve the minutes of the regular Council meetings held on July 13, 1992. Ayes 4, nays 0. LMCO JOL? Ll'N <URR REPRESENTATIVE Hurr asked If any of the Council Members planned to attend the Public Officials’ Boat Tour on Saturday. Hurr asked that a copy of the court settlement regarding North Shore Drive Marina be submitted to the LMCD. She stated she has a copy of the styrofoam ordinance. She noted that the LMCO ’ ;i concerned with more than just styrofoam docks. Jabbour noted he is expecting more scientific data on the subject And will pass it along to the LMCO. i^urr noted that the Environment Committee was granted a one "Xtension to respond on the Highway 12 issue. This response been by the LMCD. day has r,. : .... . mitEP.;X.s>pv [^■f-':^ -V ^ iv.^ii: ■ ■ - m. * .■* Ni^ ,Hiv ^4 :ilKS' H - ■ ■p ’if' 4: v^i%' W%- ’lift m '■ >i; ■:'. ,:^^'T'.^;rf*!' i■3 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 LMCD REPRESENTATIVE’S COMMENTS - CONT. Jabbour asked that those comments be District. sent to the Watershed Hurr stated that the LMCD has approved the Big Island Inc. 1992 dock I icense. Saffron said that Big Island Inc. has applled for its 1992 license, which the CouncI I will review at the August 10th meeting for either adoption or referral to the Lake Use Committee. Hurr noted that Lakeside Marina has been given 10 days to provide an as-built survey. She added that there has been discussion at the LMCD regarding conflict of interest with regards to sailors and yacht clubs. Goetten inquired about the asn project committee. Hurr reported there has been an Initial meeting, with a tour of the burn facility scheduled for next Wednesday. (««3) »1752 QEORQE W. KALWEIT, 4265 FOREST LAKE DRIVE - AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3142 It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, n adopt Resolution #3142 for Appllcation #1752 for George W. Kalweit, 4265 Forest Lake Drive, approving an after-the-fact var structural improvements of an existing deck setback area. Ayes 4, nays 0. ance to a M ow major located with.n the 75’ (M4) 61754 E. LEO BULLOCK, 2940 CASCO POINT ROAD - AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3143 It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Resolution #3143 for Application #1754 for E. Leo Bullock of 2940 Cascc Point Road, approving af te*'-the-fact variances to permit structural repairs to an existing deck. Ayes 4, nays 0. («#5) #1756 ROBERT E. WILSON, 4168 HIGHVOOO ROAD - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3144 It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to #3144 for Application #1756 for Robert E. Wilson Ro d, approving variances to permit the reconstruct•o.. season screened porch. Ayes 4, nays 0. adopt ResoIution of 4155 Highwood c^ a three IfSr.. %C,vVm a;;m..v'f' <: ■' v' ^':'‘ kV::■4k ^}i. ♦ I -is ■ ■ .V ii»...iifc : mimM ^ttS: W-^ >;^4: ......4^ v;ly { v; vr ',-A MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 (•6) PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE - BAN ON STYROFOAM DOCK FLOTATION ORDINANCE #104, SECOND SERIES Qaftron explained that the ordinance Is the result of work by the Lake Use Committee. The Planning Commission has held a public hearing on the proposed ordinance, at which time they suggested changes. He noted two draft ordinances have been submitted for review and noted the differences. Butler stated she was willing to adopt whatever is reasonable, but did not wish to drag out the process longer than necessary. She requested that styrof am buoys also be banned and requested it be added to the language of the ordlna. ce. Callahan submitted a revised draft ordinance which includes a preamble, provides for the ordinance to be included under the public nuisance section of the code, anc defines non-encased styrofoam In a similar way. He noted his ordinance requires all non-conformIng structures to be removed by December 31, 1994. He added that most marinas using these structures have been doing so for some time, and he felt five years was too long to allow this practice to continue. Jabbour noted that this Is the third season of use for ail the marinas using styrofoam structures. Hurr stated that the LMCD approved floating docks, but not a specific type. She noted that the LMCD is anticipating adorMon of an ordinance banning the use of styrofoam. She suggested ' t /the ordinance be reworded, changing "City waters" to "City Ilf. ts". Jabbour asked how the proposed ordinance addresses replacement of existing docks. Callahan suggested adding, "this exception does not Include the right to repair or replace". ■life. 4 % feferW--:-fev m. •I Srr:*r ?-v^ m- mft al ;!i^mn*^'Sf ■V-. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27 1992 ORDINANCE i104, SECOri SERIES - CONT. Jabbour reported that at the public hearing, Mr. Dunn stated he felt the City had not researched tne issue enough and provided names of contacts. Jabbour said he talked to a Fred Hunt, Consulting Engineei and expert on floating docks, who reported that the styrofoam is toe worst possiblj way of doing anything. Hunt said there are issues that no one has thought about including the danger of using styrofoam around gas and oi I , and ultra-violet rays breaking up the foam faster. Jabbour stated that United Design Association reported that if the styrofoam is to be encased, It shouId be done with a metal and plasric layer. Neil Ross, President of International Marine Institute, stated that styrr^oam is a nation-wide problem. Jabbour said :hat everyone he tahsed to was willing to back the City’s position. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, tc adopt Ordinance #104, Second Series, with the following corrections: First page, subdivision 1 - ‘Dt/Cks, platforms, buovs. and other floating structures. . . ’ Change "City waters’ to ’’City limits’. Subdivision t - ’Gasoline, funes, . . .” delete the word fumes. Subdivision 3, Page 2 - inclJde buoys. Subdivision 3, Paragraph B - "This exception does not Include repairing or replacing the existing styrofoam. Ayes 3, nays 0. Goetten abstainec. Qoetten felt that th^y did not ha/e enough time to review the proposed ordinance. Gaffron asked that the Sub-section be changed as that number has already been used. Callahan felt it best fit at the end of the chapter. He added that the mf.rina owners were given an opportunity to discuss the issue at the Lake Use Committee meetings, and they have been advised throughout the entire process. Goftten asked tc review the eimerded ordinance at the next meeting. i M MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 y:: ■f*-’MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT --A' Buti0r requested Counci I be provided wich a Iist of approved 6. ci-''rs in the fut ire. She said she was unaware that the City •N )n ued the Iicenses. Jabbour stated the Iicense should also Iist the standards for approval. Moorse said he would review i.iose standards. w -Lj., . • ■' .'ll B) Jabbour reported that the LMCD’s Task Force has hired a insdiator to form a consensus from the meetings. He thanked the City of MInnetrlsta and Scott Carl son for their support and thanked Dick Chsrba for the use of the plane. He explained that the summary Includad in tne report is based on old criteria, but the Task Force hr.s raquostsd the summary be changed to be based on new criteria. Jabbour explained that the ONR has counted 217 car/trailer parking apacas, but based upon * DNR’s old criteria :here are actually ;|I46 parking spaces aval 'e. He said the DNR has agreed to a I low 10* credit fo»- narking or v abides with canoes, jet skis and other recreational nicies. He r*as suggested to the DNR to reduce the number of parking spaces by 145 to get to the 700 parking spaces mentioned before. He aoned the Fisherman’s Lobby has supported !,0rono*s position. He sale he has been told by the DNR that this is the last study they are do ng on Lake Minnetonka, and feels Orono Is trying to stall the ONR. ■;v ENOINEER’S REPORT (••7) PAY REQUEST tS HIGHWAY 12 FRONTAGE ROAD - SEWER, WATER t STREET INPROVEMENT It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, request for payment to B A D Underground, Inc. $15,920.21 for trunk Highway 12 f-ontage road. Street Improvements. Ayes 4, nays 0. to authorize the for an amount of sewer, water and CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (•a) FUEL STORAGE BIO AWARD Moorse reviewed a memo on insurance and a memo from the Building Official regarding abo/e versus below ground tanks. He stated that underground tanks are less expensive initially. There does not appear to be a great difference in future insurance costs for underground tanks, but that is difficilt to determine. m: ---y> if'''?'-.* ' J' L /- i.y. 'f"l' fer*.-fe''- m [?P :v m M:t-:«i,^K w-m mMi&um 'mfIlf- U%K- f -f > N.-:»■:' ■ ::J4. . *‘r • ■•!tj hTNUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 FUEL STORAGE BIO AWARD - CONT. Gerhardson introduced Mike Keeie, representative Meter. from Dump and Keeie stated the underground system his company bid is a doubie tank system, eiectronIcaiIy monitored, and anchored into the ground. He noted that the governmental agencies are in the process of revamping the regulations governing above-g-'ound tanks. Jabbour asked if Keeie would recommend fiberglass versus steel. Keeie said he would. Jabbour asked about ecological effects. longer a singleKeeie explained that the tanks underground are no tank. Goetten explained they are very concerned with the environmen:a1 Issues, and have actually required others to remove underground tanks. Keeie indicated the risk factor tanks. IS the same for both types of Jabbour noted that they were told that fiberglass tanks would be approximately double the price. Keeie felt that estimate to be iicorrect, and noted that both fiberglass and steel would be approximately the same price. Keel explained that the tanks now have a l/2” thick protective coating and there has been so much new technology in this field to perfect the tanks. Callahan asked about potential for problems if there is a leak in- ground. He gathered that there is a move to more above-ground tanks and that is why the new regulations are being drafted. Keeie noted above-ground tanks are just an option which needs to be addressed. He stated that tanks are accessible through would never have to dig up monitoring equipment. all the probes on the underground manholes, and guaranteed that they the tanks, to repair or reo'ace I9M. ... Wf ■,' V ■ e ,1 i.-.i i ■ m-. •■ 0 P«, Mh MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL Mi.£TING HELD JULY ?f, 1992 FUEL STORAGE BID AWARD - CONT. Jabbour said he feels strongly against underground tanks. He noted that everything that could happen to the tanks, actually has happened. Kaale Indicated that most leaks are caused by overfilling the tanks. Jabbour understood that between 1993 and 1995 the ERA may change laws governing super funds, and may require tank owners to pay a larger portion for any cleanup costs. Frank St. Lawrence, 253 Cygnet Place, stated he has a friend who is a former employee of the RCA who told horror stories about the old tanks and wonderful stories about the new underground tanks. He said as a citizen he would rather not have to look at above ground tanks. Jabbour reminded them that they can use the existing tanks until they come to a decision or get more information on future changes. He stated that underground tanks would require the City to carry specialty insurance. Qerhardson stated he has talked to Pat Kennedy who pointed out that the City has Insurance through the League of Minnesota Cities, which Is much cheaper than from the private sector. But!er expressed her concern with the high water table o"* the site. Kaeie said the tanks would be anchored to concrete, filled with product and would be capped. Callahan noted he is not satisfied with what he is hearing. Qoetten said she would be more comfortable approving above-ground tanks. Jabbour asked if Ecovault meets current standards. Keele agreed that they do, but reminded them that those standards may change. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to table approval of the fuel storage bid award. Ayes 4, nays 0. » *1 14 d . ^ ■.*-■*f ->ri - - -:^ '.V '®f'rv.■, -':v?' ;tr-^'-> ?‘K*.; im:.. Wi^r lifeif?. A.¥m. ^!i #fr r' t-'*;:- ii pf •; .V Ml K?'mm.ii «: .^Ifife' fel«S|->- „tjfe 3i -■'sis- «te"' !#■,;?«&, «.%!H fe i--v>--si ' 1^.' ■ ■ jWim ^^aii '■ m - .■>. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 (#9) CITY CLEAN UP A YARD WASTE COSTS Moorse explained the clean up program provides for a fall clean up. He referred to costs of the c'ean up. He noted that because of the great volume collected during joth the spring clean up and the yard waste program, the cost was over budget for the amount designated for both clean ups and the recycling program. He stated a large portion of the spring clean up amount was construction debris. Qoetten felt they must make changes now to be ble to continue the program. She said that people pay to have appliances removed from their homes, and felt they should pay the nominal fee for bringing appliances to the clean up. Jabbour asked if the additional construction debris is because of the Inability to burn. Gerhardson agreed that may be adding to the volume. Jabbour suggested that the City not accept any construction material. He said he Is against raising the annual recycling fee. Callahan asked staff to suggest fees for all types of materials being brought to dispose of for Council to review at their next meet Ing. Mr. Furchner said that Wayzata charges $.60 per bag of yard waste. (#10) FIRE SERVICE ALTERNATIVES Moorse suggested reviewing the alternatives during a work session. Butler asked the L indaries of peripheral cities. Moorse stated they include Mound, Maple Plain and Wayzata and several scenarios include expanding the peripheral cities’ boundaries to cover the entire City. Goetten asked if Moorse will supply the Council with response times and costs at the work session. Moorse asked if the Council wished response times for all scenarios. s i X Butler thought only Alternatives #3 and 6 were necessary. a . j . 'f V ’ illM iifS#' m.:fkm- mi W 'i|f ;;,. wmm m. ■'’■’fesK- m 4 . i-'l ? .fe ' : ■ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 FIRE SERVICE ALTERNATIVES - CONT. Jabbour suggested discussing the alternatives with the Long Lake Fire Chief. He added that the Long Lake Firemen are great and aaded that probably about two-thirds are residents of Orono. Butch Loomis, Assistant Fire Chief of Long Lake, was present. Goetten told him that the Council has the greatest respect for the firemen on the Department. Butler explained that Orono’s concern about the fir^ department is that Orono funds 80X of the administrative costs of the Long Lake Fire Department and has 0% authority with regards to administrative decisions. Jabbour asked Loomis If the department was in need of anything. Loomis noted they need to replace one truck, but felt they had adequate equipment to cover the Orono area. » Goetten stated she took great offense to Dan Reed’s comments at the Highway 12 meeting. Callahan said there nave been comments about the firemen being in danger haring to cross Highway 12. Loomis felt that those men cross the highway during their normal lives, and felt there should be no difference when on the way to a fire. He added that the men are taught that they must obey all traffic regulations and never put themselves in danger when traveling to the fire. He asked if Orono has cried to work with the City of Long Lake regarding the administrative concerns. Jabbour noted that the Council has tried very hard to work with the City of Long Lake, but has not gotten satisfactory results. He felt that Orono should be allowed to take over the administration of the fire department. Goetten asked that Loomis forward information on the number of homes in Orono that Long Lake Fire Department services. A work session was scheduled for Thursday, July 30, 1992 at 3:30 p.m. In the Council Chambers. The Council requested that Gary Cheswick attena in the Police Chief’s absence. npv • .t ;-l /r y ^i® *i»'-}■■■■' - F 'P"' ^ 'i-r #■ rii->m I- ■■ K,^- M- • Ffe 1r S|-'Ift r V- ‘ -" ''..»■' . Mim \ ■S'" ■M V rf) ' ' *' H-'“ ■ HINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 (»t11) AMENDING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE STUBBS BAY SEWER PROJECT - RESOLUTION #3145 It was moved by Butler, secorded by Callahan, to adopt Resolution 43145 adopting Stubbs Bay sanitary sewer assessment roll. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*#12) ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO ALLOW AN EXTENDED TIME PERIOD OF HOOKUP TO THE NEW STUBBS BAY SEWER SYSTEM - ORDINANCE #105, SECOND SERIES It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to remove this Item from the consent agenda. Ayes 4, nays 0. Callahan thought that Council had decided that if a connection to the sewer was deemed necessary under the standards of the City, a property would be made to do so. He noted the ordinance proposed allows five years to all properties. Goetten thought it was decided that if a problem were found with the existing system, the property must be immediately connected to the sewer. Gaffron explained that if each existing system were examined more closely, the City would find up to 95% of the existing trench systems do not meet current standards for separation from mott'ing, and therefore would be considered as non-conforming. He noted that rsQU I r i ng 16 mon t h connec tion deadline.' for 95% of the Stubos Bay proper 11 es was not his i mpress i on of Counc il’s intent av the pub I I c hearing. Butler said that if the system is failing to the po nt that a holding tank is necessary or effluent is discharging, the property must be connected immediately. Callahan felt that the situation in the Stubbs Bay area is a bad situation and the soil is being bothered by this situation. He wants those residents to hook up as soon as possible. Jabbour noted that at the last meeting. Council left the detirmlnat Ion of the need to hook up to the sole discretion of staff. Gaffron noted that with the new shoreland regulations adapted, many more systems will be found to be non-conf orm I ng. He r.aid when a permit or variance is requester*, staff looks at the system for conformance. Callahan thought the Septic Inspector house to inspect existing systems. was hired to go hOv^se-to- '■ wiiii ^ 'is! “ . 4‘ ‘ip i;.- *.r-- tf-t •^ n- ■ttJIs-:- fii'' ■ .. . iSt m: %■ Iflm MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 ORDINANCE #105, SECOND SERIES - CONT. Gaffron noted the Inspector has not yet added soil borings to his normal maintenance procedure, although that will likely occur in the future due to the shoreland requirements. Callahan added that the base areas of the project are In serious need of ♦‘he sewer and should have to connect immediately. He felt that the deadline date was extended to allow those in other areas, such as Cygnet Place and Leaf Street with an acceptable system, additional time to connect. Qoetten agreed with Callahan. She thought the number of residents allowed the full five year time period would be very small. Jabbour stated he felt that those with a working system, should be allowed the additional time. He said with the restrictions so severe now, almost all systems would be found non-conforming. Moorse remembered a number of residents at the public hearing concerned about the criteria used by staff for conformance. Jabbour felt that part of the negotiation with the residents was a compromise on the connection deadline date. He felt the Council should adhere to their original decision. Butler thought the Intent was to change the current ordinance to allow 60 months for connection instead of the current 16 months. She said she did not envision a whole new set of regulations. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to adopt Ordinance •105, Second Series, extending the time period for hook-up to the new Stubbs Bay sewer system. Ayes 3, nays 0. Callahan abstained. (#13) AMENDMENT TO THE CITY’S FEE SCHEDULE CONCERNING THE SEWER SERVICE CHARGE FOR UN-CONNECTED PROPERTIES - ORDINANCE ilOe, SECOND SERIES Moorse explained this is a change m policy allowing the Stubbs Bay area residents up to five years to connect to the sewer if their current septic system is not failing, and waiving the service charge during that interim period. Qoetten asked If Orono s properties during that tim^ billed from the m for those Moorse stated that this is th^ City's billing for sows'* and Orono will not be billed by M.W.C.C. i ■'r the additional prope-'ties until tney connect. 1 . V.. tete lii :^44lz.¥r-». • • ::.X. MINUTE? OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 ORDINANCE #106, SECOND SERIES - CONT. Butler suggested that the wording be changed for the paragraph that starts out "Stubbs Bay Area Project. . . ' to "All properties will pay the City portion of quarterly billing beginning with service availability and billing will Include the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission charge upon connection to system". It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Ordinance #106, Second Series, as amended. Ayes 4, nays 0. r*#14) ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO ALLOW PARTIAL PRE-PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS - ORDINANCE #107, SECOND SERIES Butler asked that the ordinance clarify when the interest accrued is to begin. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Ordinance #107, Second Series, permitting partial pre-payment of special assessment for Stubbs Bay sewer project #.3937, as amended. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#15) APPLICATION OF CERTIFICATE OF PAYMENT #5 It was moved by Butler, seconded by Jabbour, to approve Citv Hall and Pub IIc Works Buiidings Architect’s aopl ication and certificate for Payment #5 as follows: Kraus-Anderson Construction Co. Steenburg-Vfatrud Construction Co. Qephart Electric Mol In Concrete Gresser Concrete/Masonry Allied MeehanicaI $21,853.18 27,000.00 22.311.00 6,331.00 29,609.10 12.347.00 Ayes 4, nays 0. Jabbour asked when they would b*» given the final cost of the project. Moorse said they have not been given this Information to date as the General Contractor is continual ly trying to find ways to reduce the amount. iv..- A' ymm If- -li f^j* a 4 - ' cV;:^'''IH- •*'^V r P«L j^M: . ^ ^mrn’mm M-.*w -m »■ ... -f .-•-if'iW;'fas# ■j'M' ■ S; ;X - J Eili* MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 (*•16) SUBRECIPIPNT AGREEMENTS & RESOLUTION YEAR XVIII COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM - RESOLUTION #3146 It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Resolution •3146 authorizing M^.yor and City Administrator to execute subrecipient agreement with Hennepin County for the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program. Ayes 4, nays 0. (•17) FALL NEWS LETTER Goetten felt they should send out a newsletter, and suggested Including an update on Highway 12 and information on the styrofoam ordinance. .5' ''“tel— Butler felt that if the Cable Commission intends to include a newsletter to be sent with the City’s newsletter, they should be made to pay half of the cost. All Members agreed. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to authorize sending out a fall newsletter, and If the Cable Commission is to Include a newsletter, they must pay half of the postage. Ayes 4, hays 0. (*•18) AMENDING DESIGNATED SIGNATURES FOR POST DISBURSEMENT MONEY - RESOLUTION a3147 It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Resolution •3147, designating signatures for the Minnesota Board of Peace Officer Standards and Training Disbursement Money. Ayes 4, nays 0. (•19) PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING CONCERNING LEAF STREET RECONSTRUCTION TO MSA STANDARDS Jabbour asked how long the City has before they must use the MSA funds for this year. Cook Indicated for this year, there Is no deadline for the use of those funds, however, Counci 1 needs to make a decision at the next Council meeting M order to allow time to draft the plans for the project and get authorlzation to use the MSA funds. Sutler asked to review the analysis before the informational meeting. Moorse noted he wl I I send out that information and Counci I may discuss the Issue prior to the Informational meeting. A public Informational meeting regarding Leaf St rest reconstructI on to MSA standards has been scheduled on August 10, 1992, during the regular Council meeting. 1 '>-r L'h.- rr r.' : r ■ % m. 0^ ?llr: ■^Sf- ■ F ‘ ' Sfc;ia '■ -r-: M^igr MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1992 (#20) JOINT MEETING WITH PLANNING COMMISSION Moors0 noted this is a joint meetinvi with the Planning Commission to discuss the proposed ice hockey a'“ena. It was agreed to have a Joint meeting with the Planning Commission on August 17, 1992 after the scheduled Planning Commission meeting, at approximately 8:00 p.m. Jabbour asked that it be announced at the beginning of the work session that this is not a public information meeting. (#21) COUNCIL PARTICIPATION IN CORN DAYS PARADE Qoetton announced that the Mayor will be riding in her own car. All Members said they do not wish to participate in the parade. (*#21A) TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT ORONO GOLF COURSE It was moved by Butler, seconded by Caliahan, lo authorize hiring Robert Dressel, Jr. at the Golf Course at an hcurly rate of $5.00 effective July 28, 1992. Ayes 4, nays 0. ATTORNEY’S REPORT The Counci I adjourned to Executive Session at 10:00 p.m. to discuss pending Iitigation. (#22) LICENSES Qoetten noted she disagrees with the granting of the trapping permit for beavers. She noted the permit runs from June 8th to August 8th and allows for up to 20 beaver to be caught. She felt this is excessive. Moorse explained that the conditions were e, traded from the DNR permit, and noted that trapping has not be^un on the property. Butler asked If there wasn’t some other way ‘o capture the beavers and move them off the property. Goetten said she appreciated the need to move the beavers on, but felt they should look at other alternatives. Jabbour suggested reducing trapped to 5 or 6 beaver. the number of beaver allowed .V rv^v- m'Mf.:h •'■:rymm m:" fe p§k--'» ■ ‘m ■ '..i; .'•;, »' ‘■0:^ ^ biS- ■ • * ■ mm i MINUTES OF THE >^F.GULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING held JULY 27, 1992 LICENSES - CONT. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Eutler. to deny the Limited Leghold Trap Permit for Richard Hassel. Ayes 2, nays 2. Jabbour and Callahan voted nay. Motion failed. Butler said If the applicant wanted to come up with some other way of capturing the beaver, she would approve the license. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to approve the Limited LegholdTrap Permit for Richard Hassel, with the condition that the applicant only be allowed to trap 5 beaver and he try to use a live trap instead of the leghold trap. Ayes 2, nays 2. Callahan and Goetten voted nay. Motion tailed. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to table approval of the Limited Leghold Trap Permit for Richard Hassel. Ayes 4, nays 0. Motion carried. It was moved by Jabbo'.”', seconded by Butler, to approve the following I icenses: Septic System Installer License - Barfkecht Excavating Annual Home Occupation License Renewal - Heliotrope Garden DesIgn One Day Set-up Permit - Smith Coll Ayes 4, nays 0. ege Club (M23) BILLS It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Ayes 4, nays 0. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to adjourn the regular Orono City Counci I meeting at 10:00 p.m. to Executive Session. Ayes 4, nays 0. allin, Citv Clerk -■ ;V'm'~ "'■= h;- •. « AGENDA FOR COONCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JULY 27, 1992, 7:00 P.M. LiV,_* : (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one raot'.on by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon request. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be a^ained upon request from the Recorder. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • 2. Regular Meeting of July 13, 1992 1. CONSENT AGENDA* n PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS 'Or*: |v LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT - JoEllen Hurr Representative 6 PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Linit 5 Minutes Per Person) m:m- Mr ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT ••APPLICANTS** kM IflBBiediat.ely after the Council has reviewed your application please sign the three (3) original resolutions at the Recorder's desk. Applicants need not execute resolutions for subdivisions, vacations and denials. 0 A:®-' m 3. 4. 5. 6. #1752 George W. Kal^eit, 4265 Forest Lake Drive - After the Fact Variance - Resolution #1754 E. Leo Bullock, 2940 Casco Point Road - After the Fact Variance - Resolution #1756 Robert E. V-ilson, 4156 Highwood Road -Variance - Resolution Proposed Zoning Oriinance - Ban on Styrofoam Dock Floatation €7 tv^ MAfOl/COUNCIL REPORT WGIHBBR REPORT m 7. Pay Request 15 Highway 12 Frontage Road - Sewer, Water and Street Improvement mf.M: CITE ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT pii 8. 9. 10. 11. ' V 2^.:. 12. 13. 'f. w ■ f Fuel Storage Bid Award City Clean Up and Yardwaste Costs Fire Service Alternatives Amending the Assessment Roll for the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project - Resolution Ordinance Amendment to Allow an Extended Time Period of Hookup to the New Stubbs Bay Sewer System Amendment to tne City's Fee Schedule Concerning the Sewer Service Charge for Un-Connected Properties - Ordinance Amendment Ordinance Amendment to Allow partial Pre-Payment of Assessments ‘ F • T.“AGENDA FOR COHNCIL MELTING SET FOR MONDAY, JULY 27, 1992, 7:00 P.M. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 15. Application of Certificate of Payment Kraus Anderson Construction Company Steenburg-Watrud Const. Gephart Electric Molin Concrete Gresser/Concrete & Masonry Allied Mechanical Subrecipienfe Agreements and Resolution Year XVIII Community Devjlopment Block Grant Program Fall* News Letter Amending Designated Signatures for POST Disbursement Money - Resolution Public Information Meeting Concerninq Leaf Street Reconstruction to MSA Standards Jcint Meeting With Planning Commission Council Participation .n Corn Days Parade 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 21A. Temporary Employment Orono Golf Course CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ICENSBS (22*) (23*) OORNMENT IWrORMATION ITEMS INCLUDED IN COUNCIL PACKET tetter bated 6/1/92 from Mallov, Karnowski, Radosevich Letter Dated 7/17/92 from Dept of Environmenca1 Management May Update - 1992 Directory of Minnesota City Officials Miscellaneous 1* OFCOHIWG ISSDES AND EVENTS - Council Meeting 7 p.m. §8/03 - Council Work Session Preliminary '93 Budget 3 p.m. 06/03 - Planning Commission Public Hearing 7 p.m. Comprehensive Plan Amendment 08/04 - Park Commission 7 p.m. 08/10 - Council Meeting 7 p.m. §8/12 - Lake Use Committee 7:45 a.m. 08/17 - Planning Commission 7 p.m. 08/24 - Council Meeting p.m. 08/25 - Filing Opens for City Office - November 3rd Flection 09/08 - Last Day to File for City Office 4:30 p.m. - November 3rd Election ^dhE ' •• /t- K ’ % J ■ X' Planning Ccrrmissicr.Council PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEEIIMG DATE PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. lA.- fi i . • IP ¥Mf<- k’t'.w m-} ^'4 ROLL MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETIN<|fS ^ HELD JULY 13, 1992 ^/> The Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Barbara Peterson, CounciI members Gabriel Jabbour, and J. Olann Goetten. Mary Butler and Edward Callahan were absent. The following represented the City staff: City AdminIstrator Ron Moorse, PubIIc Works Director John Gerhardson, Finance Dlrector Tom Kuehn, Building & Zoning Adm nist-ator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, City Attorney Tom Barrett, City Engineer Glenn Cook and City Recorder Teri Naab. Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. (#1) CONSENT AGENDA Goetten removed Item #23. It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Goetten, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 3, nays 0. Motions for all Items adoptea by consent agenda will be included In the minutes In their respective numerical order. (*«2 & #3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Goetten, to approve the minutes of the regular Council meetings he.d on June 8, 1992 and June 22, 1992. Ayes 3, nays 0. PUBLIC COMMENTS Pat Crane, 285 Leaf Street, asked If the Council, at this meeting or a future meeting, would be considering the expansion of Leaf Street. Gerhardson reported that the City would need to wait to hear If the project can proceed and the neighborhood would then be notified of a hearing date. (§4) 41739 ALBIN NELSON, 500 OXFORD ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3137 Mr. Nelson was present. Moorse explained that the Council tabled this application at their last meeting because of concerns over the removal of mature trees on the property. A MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1992 sat.« PPIa'^' 0i u . ZONING FILE #1739 - CONT. Nd I son noted that the survey does not indicate the trees are to remain. He staged that the area m front of the pool is actually a Minnesota woodlands. He said that removal ( will allow the other trees better lighting, to replant bushes on the slope because It is the designated trees He noted they intend very steep. Mabusth reported that she *nd the City Engineer inspected the site. She stated the Engineer’' report did not specifically address the loss of trees as it would be minimal in I ght of the adjacent heavy eed area. She felt It was better to install quick growing getation on the newly installed slopes to prevent further 081on. ibbour stated that Butler’s concern was preventative measures to sure the other trees wouldn’t die. Ison noted that the trees provide privacy for the pool area and III yQpy concerned about maintaining the existing vegetation. was moved by Jabbour, seconded hy Goetten, to adopt Resolution |37 for Application #1739 for .Ibin Nelson. 500 Oxford Road, ijifiOV i ng a cond itional use permit to allow filling 0 cubic yards. Ayes 3, nays 0. n excess of 16) #1741 RODNEY & SHARON 0ATZLAFF, 16 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - HIANCE - RESOLUTION #3138 Batzlaff was present. ►orse explained that this application involves a request for a -jrlance to construct a detached garage to be paced in the front setback area and within 23’ of the right-of-way. Mabusth .noted that the applicants have agreed to move the shed In the rear yard that encroached the north side of the property line. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3138 for Application #1741 for Rodney and Sharon Batzlaff of 1115 Brown Road South, approving variances to construct a detached garage in the front yard setback area. Ayes 3, nays 0. I w. ,.v ‘H MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1992 («6) #1742 JAMES & AMY LAING, 600 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3139 Mr. and Mrs. La'ng were oresent. Moorse explained that this is an application to allow the const rue tion of a f am I Iy room/garage addition replacing an existing detached garage, and for a bedroom addition to the south side of the residence. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution #3139 for Application #1742 for James and Amy Laing, 500 Orono Orchard Road, approving variances to construct additions to the existing residence. Ayes 3, nays 0. (#7) #1743 ALBERT HANSER, 1685 FOX STREET - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION #3140 Goetten stated she attended the Planning Commission meeting at which this application was last reviewed. She said Orono's past policy has been to allow non-conforming structures with the condition they meet current code for c.iy structural repairs. She noted the applicant has reduced the subdivision from a 5 lot to a 3 lot division. At the last meeting, the Planning Commission changed their original decision and recommended the applicant remove the two non-conforming structures, the shed and tennis court. She disagreed with the Planning Commission’s decision. She asked about the driveway. Mabusth cIarirIed that the Planning Commission recommended that the drive be a I lowed to remain with the appropriate variance approval. Goetten asked about park dedication. Mabusth reported that the a bike trail easement will be taken along the property I ine, and an adjustment to the park ded>catlon fee will be figured for such easement. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution #3^40 for Application #1743, Albert Hanser, 1685 Fox Street, approving the preliminary subdivision with the appropr'ate amendment to the conditions of the resolution regarding the non- conforming structures. ;u-- r.v if' € Vt'-''''' ^ .i;''. fff>’:-^V''‘ F-'':i'':-■' . ’1 > i' ■ ; ;#■* '■ >.■ r: >•; ' ••- ■. r ■ •; I’- :,' .. >: ■ ■ ■ ■ I' ’ti ' 'Mk: MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1992 ZONING FILE #1743 - CONT. Jabbour asked that the motion be amended to allow for the application to be reconsidered if this is not agreeable to the applicant. Goetten agreed to the amendment. Ayes 3. nays 0. (*#8) 1990-91-92 COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE - WINDWARD MARINE It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Goetten, to approve issuance of a commercial dock/marina license to Windward Marine, Inc., 1444 Shoreline Drive, for the 1990-1991-1992 license years. Ayes 3, nays 0. (#9) REVIEW MINNETRISTA PROPOSED SHORELAND ORDINANCE FLEXIBILITY Moorse c.-plained this is to allow the Council’s oppor tun i ty to review Mi nnetr i sta’s proposed shore-land ordinance flexibility request. Jabbour stated that Minnetrista’s philosophy is very close to Orono’s, and stated they should show then support for Minnetrista. Goetten suggested sending a letter to Minnetrista expressing t e Council’s appreciation for the opportunity to review the proposed ordinance and noting Orono’s support. It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Jabbour, to direct staff to send such a letter to Minnetrista. Ayes 3, nays 0. (•10) METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 64/640 - ANALYSIS OF ORONO’S CURRENT SITUATION Jabbour asked about the possibility of the Metropolitan CounciI stopping the Stubbs Bay sewer project because of this issue. Moorse felt that the project would not be stopped because of dansity. He said the next step would be to get that opinion In writing. He noted the Metropolitan Council would be reviewing the Comprehensive PI in amendment within the next two weeks. Saffron noted that a separate comprehensive plan amendment is planned to extend the MUSA line to the Stubbs Bay area. Moorse stated that he felt that the Long Lake area would also be approved. Jabbour felt that they shou' d get approval of Stubbs Bay area first. -_ _ __ !r t ■ ' I L'/. h t w 's %mpi K , /> H.. !^'-r Hh Kv-. ■ ' ^■v f^:S i?r- (•" MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY )3, 1992 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 64/640 - JONT. Moorse said that the Stubbs Bay area Is unique as there are not any new lots being created. Goetten f<»'t that they should not prioritize the projects. She felt that the MetropolI tan CouncI I should welcome the Stubbs Bay project because of environmental Issues. It was moved by Jabbour, to direct staff to submit for approval the comprehensive plan amendment extending the MUSA line to the Stubbs Bay area first. There was not a second and the motion failed. Albln Nelson asked if the Metropolitan Council has the power to veto the project. He suggested that the Council do whatever they have to do to ensure the project will proceed. Moorse asked Cook for the deadline date to delete portions of the project from the base bid. Cook answered that the deadline is July 14th. Moorse directed him to extend that deadline for two weeks. He said the soonest the project could start would be July 23rd. Cook noted that the permit has not been issued from the PCA as they are awa111ng approve I f rom the Met ropoIit an CouncI I. Pat Cr-<ie asked if the delay would be for the entire project or Just port Ions of It. Mayor Peterson noted It is a delay for the entire project. Moorse said that this Issue is not holding up Council’s approval of the Cygnet Place and Leaf Street area in assessment proposal. Barrett said that the contracts have been reviewed and are ready tor signature. Moorse ask»d the Council to comment on the memo by Gaffror. on the 64/640 issje. Qoetten said she Is waiting to hear what else is going to come from the M«tr...pon tan Council. w ^v- i^' t--'V‘ '-♦ , '- V i’S^v ■ri*. I.; • »•■, ••• r' ' :ii • T" ‘ % rMrw t,ii« ;'!|pemm MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1992 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 64/640 - CONT. Qaffron noted that the memo is two weeks old and at that time It was interpreted that there would be no flexibility with regards to this issue. He stated that since then, It appears there may be some flexibility. He said that the Metropolitan Counci l wouId ultimately try to enforce the rule. Goetten said she wouid rather have the Met roooI I tan CounciI address the Highway 12 issue rather than this issue. All Members agreed that Gaffron did regarding the 64/640 ruling. great job on the memo MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT A) Goetten stated that she felt they did a totally marvelous job at the Highway 12 public hearing meeting. B) Jabbour stated he was unhappy with the Watershed District s report. He thanked JoEMen Hurr for all the work she has done for the, C'ty. He noted the watershed District Is unhappy that Orono has not done any planning since 1986, and stated they would like to see a Storm Water Management Plan. C) Jabbour reported that he surveyed all public accesses on the Lake on July 4th and will present the results to the Task Force. He noted that the LCMR has granted $944,000 to the DNR for lake accesses. 0) Jabbour suggested that Callahan and Goetten review the possibility of sharing services with other communities. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to volunteer Callahar and Goetten to review the issues of shared services with other communities. Mayor Peterson noted that she and Moorse had recently attended a meeting of the 14 lakeshore cities, whore they discussed this issue. She noted that for a small fee, cities can be included in a survey of services available. Jabbour said he does not wish to participate in a Task Force on this Issue as 't will only slow down the process. Mayor Peterson said that the survey will only provide information, and each city will be on itr, own to contract in areas that they so desire. 6 ^e: ,t |v • i ? = .'■ •:f^; V:. • • I \fp-% vrr - .-9s I 1^^' ar^ :#■^:ft ^■::- *> Wk" &'■ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 199L MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. Goetten suggested that they start by pursuing those cities Initially dIscussed. Moilon: Ayes 3, nays 0. E) Jabbour reported that Hurr has expressed a great appreciation and gratitude to Gaffron for all the work he did on the shoreland regulation ordinance. He said he was thankful to have Hurr on the City’s side. ENGINEER’S REPORT There was no Engineer’s report. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (»11) STATE FEE FOR TESTING DRINKING WATER - ORDINANCE t103, SECOND SERIES Moorse explained that the Federal government additional water testing, so the State government additional funding from cities. has mandated I 5 requesting Jabbour suggested they send an explanation of the additional charge to residents with the billing. It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Ordinance #103, Second Series, adding the safe drinking water testing program fee effective with the 1992 second quarter bl1 IIng. Ayes 3, nays 0. (#12) PEDESTRIAN CROSSING OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD NORTH Moorse explained that the cross walk is being proposed because chi Idren cross the road from the school to the da> care center located in the church, and also a bike/hIke trai I will soon be located on the east side of the road and students wi I I need a crossing to get from i;he school to the trail. Gerhardson noted the cost is approximately $20t.00. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Petei son, to establ ish a crc;.swalk on Old Crystal Bay Road 25’ north of he New Lit. Bible Church driveway, and direct the Puol'c works Deiar tmen t to pi ace signage as appropriate and annual ly or ts nc-eded and have a standard crosswalk painted at that location. Ayes 3, nays 0. .r-r;-'. 1 , M-tl?: mm- m'^Wi ife ' tea-pass;*;: -m,& . a- ■taite':: ,RSS^I&- > te 111p#- fel^-tea ift-v‘lEa-fedf?. #Fi"' ;^S-f:': Siii>^ ■ |j?"'" '• •■'■ ■■ivte- -,- V ipiS: - MINUTES OF THE REGULAR OROHO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1992 (§13) STUBBS BAY SEWER IMPROVEMENT - ASSESSMENT UPDATE Moors® explained that this is the assessment role proposal for the Cygnet Place and Leaf Street areas. Mayor Peterson thanked Frank St. Lawrence, Dean Moline, and Gene Deterling for ail the work they did to ensure a resolve of this issue. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt the assessment role as presented for the Cygnet Place and Leaf Street areas. Ayes 3, nays 0. (§13A) STUBBS BAY SEWER IMPROVEMENT - UPDATE Moorse said they would try to find a way to begin the project prior to July 23rd. Jabbour noted that a special meet I ng cou I d be called if necess'-y. He suggested getting endorsement from the Environmental Committee of Lake Minnetonka on the project to submit to the Metropolitan Councii. Moorse suggesiec. staff submit to the Metropolitan Counci I a summary on the env 1 roi.i’entaI issues Involved with tne project. (#14) STUBBS BAY SEWER IMPROVEMENT - RESOLUTION #3141 BONO SALE Moorse explained that the Counci I is ready to make a final decision on the scope of the project, but they must wait for approval by the Metropolitan Council before proceeding. Carolyn Drude suggested es.abiishing the date of the sale as August 10th. She said this date would be contingent upon approval of the project by the Metropolitan Council. Jabbour clarified that the bond has to be called for particular project. He asked If it prohibits the City, If have access funds, to use It for another project. th i s they Drude said 't does not prohibit the City from doing that if one project were aborted, but said the Federal government i not real supportive of such actions as an original intent. Jabbour asked if there were any bonds the City shCLlJ retire in lieu of the financial market. 8 ■ ^ - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------- m:Sf ■ I, .p: h f/ p' MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1992 STUBBS BAY SEWER - CONT. Moorse said the only bond with enough principal left would be the bond for the Crystal Bay area, but that bond Is not callable until a later date. Drude handed out a sheet which showed a one year history of bonds. She stated that the market Is one that Is probably worth taking advantage of, but not to jeopardize the City s readiness factor. Crane asked if, by approving the sale of the bonds, the Council is committing to any vested commission due. Crude •'tated that fees incurred by her company are payable after the ’ s are sold and proceeds delivered. She said that there is no f- if the sale Is aborted. The City may incur a small cost If the d .te Is postponed and the resolution needs to be revised. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3141 calling for the sale of bonds for the Stubbs Bay sewer project. Ayes 3, nays 0. (#15) CHANGE ORDER #1 ~ LIFT STATION #9 Mc''rse explained that this lift station has had many failures recently and It was determined that the contractor would need to Install by-pass pumps at an additional cost. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to authorize Change Order #1 to New Mech Companies, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $8,200.00. Ayes 3, nays 0. (#16) 1991 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL REPORT Goetten asked about the news release about the financial reporting award. Mayor Peterson said the document would oe discussed at a future meet Ing. (#17) SELECTION OF NAME FOR CITY HALL FRONTAGE ROAD It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Jabbour, to select Kelley Parkway as a name for the frontage road serving the new City facilities. Ayes 3, nays 0. .. I ■W |.. ' I'l- ip i*.w:mi'rT'- t - '-J r^Sw- feA. ■i' : -r: ' ■ ■•' ' SfeiSiiM" MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1992 (i18) CITY FACILITIES BID AWARDS Jabbour said that major Issues had never been budgeted for because of changes in standards that the City will be forced to deal with. He stated he would like to hold off on anything they ao not need to purchase immediately. Gerhardson noted the bid awards are under the estimated budgeted amoun t. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to award the following bids: Floor sealer at Pub Iic Works to Technical Surfacing, Inc. for an amount of $8,850.00; Insulation of attic at City offices to CItywIde Insulation for an amount of $10,220.00; Ceramic to Dale Tile for an amount of $21,292.00; and Structural and miscellaneous steel erection to Amerect for an amount of $15,145.00. Motion: Ayes 3, nays 0. (•19) FUEL STORAGE BID AWARD Moorse explained that staff has weighed the cost of above storage versus oeiow ground storage. He stated the above storage would cost approximately $17,000 more. ground ground Jabbour stated that he strongly feels the tanks should be above ground. Goetten agreed with Jabbour for environmental reasons. Cook felt the underground tanks were fine and stated there will always be some risk with the underground tanks. He stated that two- thirds of ail cities are still going with the underground tanks. Jabbour stated that It used to be lOOX of the cities were using underground tanks. He said he would like staff to review insurance costs for underground tanks and directed staff to project those figures out for a couple years. It was moved by Mayor Peterso.n, seconded by Jabbour, to table the fuel storage bid award to allow staff to further review the issue. Ayos 3, nays 0. mK.V'i»i-' ■!..P' < -a''.'.fe- p' K.-' fi^ h-^u..-p-I ru. i^/.' > •/ • 9v iiWm- Is kkt. k th. ft'*. Mf'-m-k-m.sS- V, W § 4k-“ ' / MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 1.'', 1992 (*•20) STEPHEN WECKMAN PERFORMANCE REVIEW & SALARY ADJUSTMENT It was moved by Mayor Petersen, seconded by Goetten, to increase Stephen Weekman to Level 6, Step 3 a: an hourly rate of $13.60 to be effective July 20, 1992 with a recommended salary review scheduled for December 1993. Ayes 2, nays 0. (*•21) SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION 1991 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Goetten, to approve the 1991 Summary Financial Report for publication. Ayes 3, nays 0. ATTORNEY’S REPORT There was no Attornev’s report. (*•22) LICENSES It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Goetten, to approve a Special Event‘d -emit fo- Rick Recker/St. George Church for the Corn D*yc root Race to be held August 9, 1992 from 12:15-1:00 p.m. Ay^s 3, nays 0. (•23) BILLS Goetten asked why the City has service for 1989, 1990 and 1991. request for payment of fire Moorse said Maple Plain has just sent the bill. Goetten said she hopes this practice will not be allowed in the future. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Ayes 3, nays 0. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adjourn the Orono City Council meeting at 8:45 p.m. Ayes 3, nays 0. i&t. fo.. W'''B m^- W' . ,..rifcb^v *M: S m -H't?/ :-.f;.;.,v^ ■ :-.K ■■ Xi':.W'm :‘-v: 'ni. v|;;-'M-: i-* -m {■ '3-\B& 'r/''t:'•HU* HINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1992 RECONVENED MEETING It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to reconvene the Orono City Council meeting at 8:50 p.m. on July 13, 1992. Ayes 3, nays 0. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Pete^-son, to establish a public hearing tr» be held by the Planning Commission on August 3 1992 at 7:00 p.n. and a ;ubl ic hearing to be held by the Counci I on August 10, 1992 at 7:00 p.m. to review the Comprehensive Plan amendment for Stubbs Bay. Ayes 3, nays 0. adjournment It was moved by Jt ' ur, seconded by Goetten, to adjourn the Orono City Council meeting at 8:55 p.m. Ayes 3, nays 0. Barbara A. Peterson, Ma''or ATTEST; Dorothy M. Hal I In, City Clerk hx:- m i. ■ • K'-'-’te. r"t: N ^ n. I - m i tv • r;r.rVv.- q-.,>m 'V- I’-'XX • >^r >'* ' h. i} ■».< y-.i ‘I;. ;•■ ;- '• :X‘',.-\f . :.'t-*;V^. ^ y0:y ■ i ^0y . ■ -i- :r-^'y:''yx XV Wx^ T. :.f%- m^‘- ;if- ^•• '-• ' • • '. ' ;. *t ■• % 3 %Toi Chairman Kelley and Planning Commisi ion Membra ^ Mayor Peterson and City Council ^^ Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building « Zoning Administrator^^' Dates Subjects July 9, 1992 0 'J #1752 George W. Kalweitf 4265 Forest Lake Drive - After the Fact Variance - ?*ublic Bearing Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) ~ Lakeshore setback variance required for major structural improvements of existing deck located within 75' setback area. Allowed ■ 0 Existing « 69' Variance *= 6' or 8% Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 A.0-75' setback area Allowed ■ 0 Existing - 305 s.f. 13,725 s.f. Propo sed “ 105 s.f. B.75-250' setback area = 24,075 s.f. Allowed “ 6,019 s.f. or 25% Existing * 5,456.3 s.f. or 22.6% No hardcover variances required for approval of structural repair within 75-230' setback area. Xilst of Bzhibtts - A - Application B - Plat Nap C - Property Owners List D - Plan B > Building Permit for Screening in of Porch F - Building Permit for Residence 12/29/69 G - Topographic/Grading and Drainage Improvements for Forest Arms Plat B - Forest Arms Plat I - Survey Description of Request Applicant's contractor was stopped in the process of completing Structural repair of an existing 8'x60* deck at the lake side of the existing residence. Based upon the inspector's observations at the site, it appeared the structure could be located within the 75* setback area. Applicant was asked to provide a survey on file for the necessary building permit. Applicant filed a variance application as r' Zoning File #1752 July 9, 1992 Page 2 c, - >. f I W'm l•^ '0-h r -fe.- soon as it was realized that portions of the deck were located within the 0-75' setback area. There is a 6’ encroachment of the lakeshore protected zone and 105 s.f. of structural hardcover located within the 0-75* setback area. Applicant has just recently purchased the property in April of this year and plans to complete other rennovations within the interior of the structure. Upon a site inspection, members will noce remnants of a former gravel drive that was located within the street yard. Mr. Kalweit plans tc complete the restoration of the grassed yard as soon as the interior improvements are completed. Based on staff's review of the hardcover within the 75-250* setback area, it appears that no hardcover variances are necessary for the structural repairs of the deck outside of the 75' setback area. Review Exhibit B, technically applicant is also required to seek approval of an average lakeshore setback variance as entire structure is located in front of the average setback line of the adjacent flag lot to the immediately north. A commons outlot abuts the lot to the immediate south. Deck structure has no impact on the lakeshore views of the flag lot nor on the house to the immediate south of the Commons lot. f has enclosed copies of the 9 .'ading and drainage plans and plat fct North Arm, Exhibits G and H. It is staff's understanding that the applicant wants the City to address their concern regarding a drainage problem along the south side lot line. An underground PVC pipe outlets within the lakeshore yard of the applicant. The plat, Exhibit H, shows the City did not obtain the necessar> drainage and utility easements along the south side of the lot. Staff inspected the site and can confirm that there is no rip rap at the outlet nor was there any sign of any improvement to minimize erosion. Exhibits have been included as merely information for Planning Commission as staff has not received a written statement regarding applicant's concerns . Bardahip statement Please review Exhibit A. Ti :•. 'S k'’ & I. Zoning File #1752 July 22, 1992 Page 3 Additional Comments and Planning Commission Recommendation Additional Exhibits Exhibit J - Kalweit Letter of July 17, 1992 Exhibit K - Draft of Planning Commission Minutes 7/20/92 Planning Commission members were concerned with the hazardous condition of the deck area in its incomplete state as railings on stair areas and within certain sections of second story deck were not installed. Applicants adivised that it has been very difficult, especially when young children are visiting mwww^i ‘■wnw *‘tA‘-»«-L,. mm^mrn^^: "Mm »'*'> ^.:v^>i' A RBSOLOTIOH GRAMTIHG VARIAMCXS TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE iierxoil 10.22, subdivisioh 1 (b) and sobdf FILE #1752 „ wnKRBAS, George W. Kalweit and Katherine M. Kalweit ^(hereinafter *the applicants") are owners of the property located at 4265 PoroMt Lake Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter •City") and 1 tgally described as follows: Lot H, llock 2, Forest Arms, Hennepin County, Minnesota (herein.! Ctar "the property"); and ‘A-'4 'ii ^ WHPpISBSt the applicants have applied to the City for -the-fa Its variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, iviaion i (B) and Subdivision 2 to permit major structural (pair to axisting deck located 69 feet from the shoreline tead of t a required 75 feet and seek approval of a hardcover riance w:* In the 0-75 foot setback area where no hardcover is 4 4|ian• • s.Ota I IBFOBB, BB IT RESOLVED by "“he City Council of mroiMGS *rtiia application was 'eviewed as Zoning File #1752. m pal The property Is located in the LR-IB, Single Family Lakaaliora Residential Zoning District requiring 1 acre ia area and the property consists of .S6 acres. .. :i«: m-l Arw^.’iili3s i,I'w-m.- The Orono Planning Comsiissjon reviewed this application on July 20, 1992, and recosuoended approval of the proposed after-the-fact variances ) *sed upon the following findings: Aa l-v The home was built in 1970 prior to the current lakashore developswnt ordinances adopted in 1973- 1975. mm m '.AY ■ ■: -Sr B. ;A '■; m’-m. 'S?S W;- The deck is in a hazardous condition requiring major structural repairs. Page I of 4 I,..lih II,It t&^” -- iSs,. i^'f m-■?p^.-.'. v^LV *•;- ■ ■r II3. vr ;S- :''^>e'm Is: m,uHI'* IS- fe'v #?■ / tycr>-^ 4. 5. C.Based on the pattern of deveiopmerr of the adjacent properties, the subject deck has no visual impact on the lake views of the adjacent residences. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the after-the-fact variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, bit is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant) and would be in keeping with the spo.rit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this applies ..ion including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Cmnsnission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the after-the-fact variances on the health, safety and welfare of the ccMBiunity. C0NCLO8IOB8, OIIDEil AMD C0MD1T10N8 Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Oreno City Council hereby grants after-the-fact variances to Municipal Soning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) and Subdivision 2 to permit major structural restoration of a deck located within the lakeshore protected area and 105 s.f. of hardcover where no such ii^rovepients or hardcover are allowed, subject to the following ooaditionst 1.Authorities granted by this after-the-fact variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a penalty building permit within ten days of ‘,he date of Council's approval of this resolution (August 6, 1992). Page 2 of 4 1 'Hi '•r. r» , ■■ ‘ %;■- . r'' mt ■ A- I 2,Violation of or non-compliance with any of tne terms and conditions of this after-the-fact variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 3.The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successrrs and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of July, 1992. ATTEST* Dorothy N. Rallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor George M. Kalweit Katherine M. KaIweit 8TATF OP NXIIHBSOTA ) )ss. iiTY or IHEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledge<' before me on this 27th day of July, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson i Dorothy M. ■allin. Mayor t City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota ■aaieipal corporation and said instrusMnt was executed on behalf of the City. Motary Public Page 3 of 4 ■ . .r . r -.r;'ilV '.rt •»>£._ 44 . / A '4 ' i i ■4 * t ■ Mm iMm- m. tf' i-m m- ■ Si: >' w m 11%,i;i m\ te-rv*^* •■ M-S|^w ^V. M A CXTX OF OXOHO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Faa $175.00 ($30.00 par each additional variance) Renewal Variance Pee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non confonaing use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fee* (Double application fee) nOFSlTr IFF Site Address Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) ^ IamaI .fAMfovt n^4 nn ¥n anolicatlon if not rrrv ,Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date PopartY Acquired _______(month/year) ___ I (doMO n^ also o%m the adjacent parcels of land. Pi^esentUSeof property: ^ residential ____other (specif BFFK£ 1 CITY OF 0f<{ t .••..\,W*A «^V4_ k,'Vi-W 01 QEii 350 »C---a Zoning District: AFFLICAMT i^tCtlFr-JHAnK YOU Phone (home ) vv -A »V a t vw ^ fe. n|. UCfVLiuetT^______ Phone . 79 i.« 42^5 Fc(^c<T i4i^ t)K- citv! OfiDVO_ _ _zip« (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _. Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: PttCRXPTZOII OP RBQ0R8T Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: ■xyizxD lot Area Lot Width Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average lokeshore rmuf /dssciizptiow op mrosoAL prcmrtt cooitioms Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditicMUS preventing coeipliance with Zoning Code requitamcntsi 'Msa# •-IT m (attach additional sheets if necessary) HQ0I1SD SUBMITTALS All o£ tb«_fo 1 loirina infotaation must be subad-ttcd by the application d—dline date In order for your application to be considered ccMpletet 1. 2. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-60:^ Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map (obtained with property o%mers list). 4« Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%”xll” for reproduction)• S» Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy e^^xll”). S. Sketches or plans of floor 4 elevation views (provide 1 copy eJi^xll"). 7. 8. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour variaace application is not complete if the imfmrmation has mot been included. AffLZCAMT*8 SX6MATURB The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment; and/or con^-ultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature r]T0Cu to tn^ D0st or niS/ni Date ii- ONHDUI SXGMATOKB The cwner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further aothorises reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consult-^nts, agents. Commission m«nbers, and Council members for purposes of investiga- 5Vi tion and verification .of this r Omar's Signature lu UT. Lje Date % b!'- ‘ - Applicant must have all sulxnittals into the City offices 2S days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month.* Applicants must be present at all ecliedaled reeiem meetings oC tbe Plamning Comniasion and Cooncil. If an applicant ia unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrang«Rents to have an authorised agent attend in your place and to advise the Building $ Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 'fife .- ■i i»^k-‘^- ■ V- 4- ii.;" i- ’|fe ‘it- »‘vt-' ' Ff4‘-Jfew p ■-l»-S*a'm 1^ pfte fig >> (10) (?8) ( '3) I::.- 2«t.i y4 4 (26) afW* »*«*ir# :l#f ''Ife’ ^ '^e*- J^ferA ' i 92) 2rr.T^ 1 W’> \ ,(93) i;ft.| 1 w. UAKE i mu ■] ^ in\ V——i_i X «»' ‘ix s W -i.- (2 ri—rr "t»«)K ««e «•« ■UI\»*^ 6., ,i .: ( (95) U^5) yjyswM3 • (23) MVUCATION fOR WIIMW PnMir AND cnmnttn OF occuMNcr V«MM Of OMMO, MMNIMM •tMMt »tt mn fd *.1?^. ftw\( ft't OATt 2942 T-/- HMAiTf Mt rofAi wwMo oitnNcr fOMC MOMOAn AtaWAMA It « Vl^3g-|Sjlqjo^AMA MTIO lf#« Mil OPritAtir AAMM <Til. M».| t MO or fTomi orr otMi H. P WtOrt AMf A Mbw- ta. OP 4N ffTSTSSRpoAPAANiv 3)t Jtiii ■■ m- i-v a r ;:■W' if- fep:'.. p»f#' AdCNOWLfO tt«, t9f Wm IT AND SGNATUAC a«t «F •« wtN OAff r i I ( i VIUAOI or ORONO lUUDINO PUMjT ho fmnai No. SZsc .dr ruvou 09 Mil MIttOfll mONf rio. Hi 233S llodi A44lHm* or SwM*vlalon tUAOINO lOCATION Oil. From load Oil. IMm Ole lock •rick. Solid •rkk V< tnxT CooilroilliH Siio 0 <6 for 1/ Floor 'f- ■* C'C. m . siio NO. Of ffUrtAOS____ Typo CW(, U^€C‘ »> ^4-ip u A.i ii dri^ VINTIMTION AND UONT forcootopo of UpM to floor Aroo / O WfU TYFl Conttrwcfiori location time TANKS Ot fc. 'NfdfAl MOOKUf □ Sito OtNowco from Wd. ^^ "/~gtiy?ca:a'v> OlAINflMO Depth Width lenpth Olatonce from WoM OUtonco from lot Unoi M fUlMMNO fomwis Oerhepe Oopewl /Olah Woahor / Sink!//Shmeor/t lotrndiy^ToMot/// loth TwH /lovmory //// < ^#-"1 ' L-- 2r-r^'i. -- 5t i »-:*s#i^. *.' i. ■» *'■'' ' ^' '1■; i- ■:, n. .A:- WBipf tr • I* l^y^t '■ ili^i ri:"% (A "■ i£« lllfti?:' !#?• Planning CoroinisBion of Oro^ Orono City Council City of Orono Orc^ no, Mi nne sota July 17,1992 On April 24,1992 we became owners of the property at 4265 Forest Lake Drive. Previous to purchasing the property, we engaged the services of a certified home Inspector, Mr. Donald Hedquist,who determined that the deck had dangerously rotting boards which should be replaced and joists which should be reinforced. Therefore we hired a carpenter, Mr. Tony Schrempp, to make the needed repairs. He is from Victoria and has never done work in Orono, hence was unfamiliar with the Orono building codes. Although we have been residents of Orono for twenty one years, and had always secured the necessary permits for any construction il'Movement9 involving plumbing and electrical and any ed<>.cions we made on our former residence, we did not think it would be necessary to secure a permit to repair a structure that had existed for twenty two years. In fact, in IMlk.i *tg the repairs Nr. Schrempp brought the railings up to code, by raising them to the proper height and 6" board width. IPrsviously the railing was open and unsafe and in fact protruded at the top an additional 15 feet toward the lake. Since we feel that our not securing a permit and seeking a variance was an innocent mistake, we would like to request that you waive the $175.00 penalty which was imposed. Katherine H. Kalweit 2 1 mu"'" v'flfe. 'ittc '■ ^sft 'i rtt. lif ^ -V rv.j;s. •; ^ . Iter ■ •• • f i^lgite MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 20, 1992 ZONING FILE §1750 - CONT. Johnton r«mlnd«d th#m th«t this type of Issue came up during an applicmtion on Baldur Park Road. Habusth explained that It Is the structural Impact that they are daaling with. H«naon atattd tha applicants would be willing to further reduce Tn t?le 7S-250- zone by removing plastic under landscaping. Mabusth said that may cause some drainage concerns. MrSe Pyle said the Building Inspector has confirmed that it would not create a problem. Rowlette Indicated she would consider approval of the application ?? 1*^*00110.01 reduced the roofed are. I and removed additional hardcover used in landscaping. All ot Members agreed. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Rowlette. to table JItSS for Charles and Shirley Pyle of 35*8 Ivy Place, to allow applicants to redesign their proposal. Ayes 4, nays o. Ipte ■ f • . (S7) ei752 GEORGE W. KALWEIT. JaRIA^^-^PUBLIc'h^ING J*c?te of Mai I ing were noted.The Affidavit of PubI Icat ion and Cert i f Icate of Mai I Ing were nox George Kalwelt was present for this application. He letter sent .o the City explaining the ”,.k the Sul'scontracted with a builder who was unfamiliar with the c y ordinances and did not obtain a building permit. The project as SwpSJd p?lor to completion, and noted hi. safety concerns. It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Cohe'^* r!fr«Tt*Llkl'*OH^ of Appiication S1752 for George W. Kalwelt. 4265 forest Lake Driv . for a variance to allow structural repairs within the 0-75 setbac area. Ayes 4, nays 0. 8 r^%'-' ■ tY'. i*.Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron MoorsOf city Administrator ©i'i- B«t«s Svbioots Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Administrator July 15, 1992 #1754 E. Leo Bullock, 2940 Casco Point Road - After the Fact Variances - Public Hearing • iii. '4i Wmxtimmmt OrdiaaBoee 9 Saetion 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - Deck encroaches 1'3-in front of average lakeshore setback line at east corner of deck. is»;fcitMS'* Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Review of hardcover. 0-75* « 6,375 s.f. Hardcover ■ 0 s.f. 75-250* area - 11,050 s.f. Allowed ■ 2,762.5.f. or 25% Existing ■ 5,046 s.f. or 45.6% (Refer to Exhibits G and B. Please note staff has adjusted area within 75-250* setback area) Proposed ■ 5,046 s.f. or 45.6% Variance ■ 2,203.5 s.f. or 20.6% I' mX ■>v feetioa 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) - Side setback variance. Required ■ 10* Existing * 9* Proposed ■ 9* Variance ■ 1* or 10% iWIf • |W fe'-’ fjM Mat of HidObita - A - Application H - Plat Hep C - froperty Owners List D - Coaetraetioa Plan I - Real tstate Listing/Ploor Plan f - Sarvey d - lardeover Pact Sheets ■ - lerdoover Site Plan 1 - Ml .ith Letter J - 1-2 Photos of Deck (View Impact);V' Request J^prplieant's «>ntractor proceeded with major structural repairs o eaiOiiiag deck without obtaining required building perait. Deck wa eoMpleted by the time the new construction was observed by th RalldiBg inspector. The building inspector was completing a sit iMapectloa at the adjacent property when the newly constructed dec %Nie noted* Mr* ^llock isusediately contacted the toning staff and ___.Cii* ;; .......... lolling File 11754 ^ July 15, 1992 Pnge 2 filed the variance application as soon as the updated survey was coBplated. The deck slightly encroaches the average lakeshore setback line. Mote Mr. Nenth, the neighbor most impacted by the encroachment, has aubedtted a letter reaffirming his support of Mr. Bullock's variance xeguest* Mote also that at the east lot line the deck is located 9 instead of the required 10*. Please review Exhibit E. Applicant has provided the original raal estate listing information that shows the portion of the second lavel deck that was recently reconstructed. The inspectors have confirmed that the deck was not expanded. Inrdsliip 8tst r f Please review Exhibit A. As Mr. Bullock ’s statement notes the shape of the lots and the fact that all lots are located on a curve or cove of the lake a slight encroachment of the average setback line has no real impact on the views of the adjacent residences. fe::- Zesjes for Consideration 1. ■ ’ liM ...Wa-’'- !%• 75-250* setback area consists of 45.6% hardcover. 744 s.f. or 6.7% is landscape area underlain with plastic. Applicant has advised that because of the sloping topography landscape areas unaerlain with plastic have been installed along the sides of the house to prevent drainage problem. 2.Are there other areas of non-essential hardcover that can be considered for removal? '■"M.Any recommendation of approval must contain the condition that n^licant obtain a penalty building permit for construction of deck. “■rite'' ^ - •‘■V-, . • y-¥■mmi. ¥ ’V. |‘ir ^vr, ...M/r- pf ■ It;:" ■'m r. ::> n:mk ii‘ p';;;*- . ii p ■•iv:* M;;i W,Jf. • :;ti •(f,i:- '::' r r-.mm "f ^'\k ■m-^- \IWim- & •'..V Zoning File §1754 July 23r 1992 Pege 3 Additional Coanenti and PlanL.^itg Conmisaion Recoomendation Applicant advised the Planning Crmmission that he was no aware of the need for a building permit. He felt this was the responsibility of his builder and regretted the entire matter. Nenbers questicvied applicant as to the possible removal of existing non*essentia1 improvements as hardcover was not .d at 45«6%. They asked if landscape areas underlain with plastic could be removed. Staff cautioned that the landscape areas along the north and south sides of the residence were needed to prevent runoff from impacting lower floor of the residence. Mr. Bullock advised as a result of the sediment build-up along the north side of the house from the public drainageway that runs from Casco Point Road to the cove or lake that the lower level of his residence has been flooc«&>.'. Members noted that the lakeshore protected area had no hardcover. The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of he after-the-fact variance as proposed by applicant. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings of the Planning Commission recommendation with the condition that applicant obtain a penalty buildinj permit. lav _iV-. rP •. rIv s A RBSOLQTIOH GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAI. ZONING CODE CTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 (B), SBCTJON 10.22, SUPOIVISION 2 AND 8BCTION 10.25, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) PILB #1754 WBBRBAS, E. Leo Bulloc'x (hereinafter "the. applicant") !■ the owner of the property located at 2940 Casco Point Road within the City of Oror.o (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Tract 0, R.L.S. No, 461, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and ■*» I- im NIBRBAS, the jv,plicant has applied to the City for ; e£ber*the**fact variance:, to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, l-dllbdlvision 1 (B) to permit structural repairs of a deeJe that eseroeches 1* 3" in front ca.th average lalceshoro setbac)c where Ne Snoh encroachment is allowed, a variance to Section 10.22, NeMivision 2 where tna reconstructed deck is located within the 7$«*250* setback area where an excels of hardcover at 5,046 s.f. dr 4S»6% exists and where only 25% is allowed ind a variance to ^idddtion 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) as deck is located 9* from the kl side property line instead of the required 10*. MON, TNBRMPORR;- BE IT RB8ULVBD by the City Council of OroiBu, Minnesota: FINDINGS mB' 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1754. 2.The property is located in \.he LP>1C, Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning strict requiring 21,78C s.f. or 1/2 acre in area. Th property consists of .7,425 s.f. or .4 acres. 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 20, 1992 and recommended approval of the proposed af ter-the*-f act variances based upon the following findings: A.The house and deck were constructed sometime in 1955 prior to the shoreland regulations of the City adopted in 1973-75. Page 1 of 4 Mi- M. ■:)A ! t r'I tl:n. i»i'4 i I, * 1i'0.m II ■I''-fe. . k.rj H - t.t-( - ■’M. •;■■ Ii- i-fe'; • *- »- ' *• ■ mm in 4. 5. B.The major structural repair of deck did not involve an expansion from the existing building envelope. C.The lots on Casco Cove are located on a curved portion of shoreline and the slight encroachment of the average setback line has no real impact on the views from the adjacent residences. D.The City nas received a letter approving the reconstruction of the deck from the neighbor receiving the most impact from the existing deck. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to allevi’'^s a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Coflprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recosuitendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the variances on the health, safety and welfare of the ccmmunity. O0MCLO8IOHS, QRDEB AMD COHDITIONS Based upon one os more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances tc Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B), Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) that will approve the major structural repairs to an existing deck located 1* 3* in front of an average lakeshore setback, improvements to t structure where excesswc of hardcover exist within the 75-250' setback area at 5,046 s«f. or 45.6% and where the deck is located 9* instead of the required 10* from the north side lot line. This approval is subject to the following conditions: Page 2 of 4 te,y; 1.Applicant shall obtain a penalty building permit from the City within 10 days of the apprcval resolution (August 6, 1992). of this 2.Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only. 3.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4. mm A--- The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terras of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording o^ this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Hlr.n:^sota at a regular meeting held on the 27th cay of July, 1992. a .AtTOST: tlorotKy M. Hallin, City clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor S. Leo Bullock STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )8t» . COONTT OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of July 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson i Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor 6 City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota ■unilolpAl corpoMtion ^nd said inatruBiant: was axacutsd on bahalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 4 __ 7^-T^-0 fi 4 VfH CITY OF OKOMO - VARIANCE APPLICATION A & m mmii g'li/ liK' IIh ■ ||. •7 f ••]Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 par each additional variance) Ranawal Variance Fee $100.00 j (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) d U iiUX. Kt VI PtOPERTY mFORMATION Site Address £9V p (^Oor, To,^ /^cj?. Of<ryu,^ /?/x^/ Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) - ^^— Attach legal description to application if not included on required Date Property Acquired_ _ _J / /S _ _ _(month/year) 0O3S / TTV •. i La f ' v.'j • *. t r V 1 w'VVV favi? FfJCf “c yifVA C*C.»' Wl. I \ w r 4.WMI HHTTCdo not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Pj ^s^'.xt use of property: t»^^*r^idential _ _other (specify); ioning District: _ 350,0 ‘. 350.C. £ipr-ynm you *V wWA I vw yO/ S.W APPLIC'NT Name /LCo Phone (home) C ! X - ^ 117^62. Phone (work) 111 - 7 Address Office Po'rA /^Citv: Orollo /f1^> Zip: OWNER (if different *-han applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: DBSCaULPTXOE OP REQUEST Describe request in detail: Estimated Censtruction Cost $ J . ' i- ' 1:.'^ h VARXAECB8 EBQOIRED Lot Area y' Setback: Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage front Side Rear Average Lakeshore islf; Other (specify) I > I*T t •P/DBSCRIPTXOM OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS t'. .jj' liM'v '•' ff®" Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property cooditions preventing cojipliance with Zoning Code r^uirements: JZX .;•■(attach additional sheets if necessary)naaiMMD SOBHITTALSAll of tha folloirinQ inforaatlon aost be sttbiaitted by the application dato in order for your application to be considerctd ccniplete Ccxnpletad Application Form “certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain \~thl8 list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%"xll" for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and propor.ed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy Sh^xll"). Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy BH^xll**). _ _‘As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff f f ih w The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please r«nember that your variance application is not complete if the lafonMtion liee not been included. APFLICAMT'S SI6HATDRB The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees tc pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the be^^ of his/her )cnowledge. Applicant's Signature rect to the be^ of Date JtZ /ff%/ OW— SIGHATPAB The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees tc this applicatio.i . 1 further authorises reasonable entry onto the property oy city staff# .'insultants, agents, commission members, and Council members ror purposes of investiga tion and verification ofr^his jsacueat. Oimer's Signature Date /rfi^ Applicant must havu all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Flanaing Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month.* Applicants must be present at ell aebedulmd iMetimgs oif the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unsble to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have en authorised agent attend in your piece and to advise the Building % Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. i I i(!V' ■ “ * •• » • * Ef.; 0 r^- if'fr'' £v‘ T: ' . 'tSftt ■ >*>‘. >t :- r: Pi%§v _ r' 2. • V>. ^ '■, ' ' • - ■• - i. Y . > ^ r«w%» ^ C- m:^ *. M^'t. %<i-- .il' . Vsg^:': .;"SM^' ^ V, X M X X O V< S» ^ M ci - i r" § M Mi N -<^ m O 79 o Xir >O o X .s83|5SS "833*1 ! X >•> o 8S ►-<m O %f X Mi Mi H X O ►-*^ m ^ i-> X 5 z p5g e* X o II sA N -< S3 oX p Z r^ X ^i!8 fii»S H O I ss # # o i\6,- S2 Ul M z M 0 1 o •«- o ►- X S V X o rsi «-* O Mi Ss:::M M g*s -n i«i 55?r‘-2S X ni Z X 0 w X ^ i-i M %• Q| SSS*5 X K CP 0 fS» K ^ f- f- N 1^ r- f- ^ 9 1-4 •-•►-• fS» HO _ 0 *:is8r -1 ri 9 9 0*r55 3 0 * X 0 M in Z ^ ^ g Mi i 1 -i ■< < S'* •K ^ C e p S •>•-io|S o -4 0-0|5is5 M m -o m » X V -<sss 53-< M 'J O •i Oie U <• O Mi > > P In M fs» M> Ml o ni O X X I X H illIn X Mi a M oX X n M I S'** 55**•< Mi m m H O S ^ O Mi n» (B ># Mi O fS» 0 1 XO ni m in M in Z ^ ^Mi H M X SI ^ X X O i-' I fM O Mi X Mi O •- IH 5§ Mi X a 55""*S« r» o « “9*"sr Ss’-.-ss M-?5 |l A ^ 55*,-> m z o O X > o O 2 X X m X ri X X O g > >0 X X M K i-i M rsiOf-r-i-»► ^ r- r- o r# H D M► 5T.3, ^ ^ 5r82 H O 3 X Mi O iM §8* ^ •- fM n» 552*r> o X > 9-4 n m ^ ^ ^ r* X X n o S ^ 9 ^ X 9 Xm o H H X ss Xo in ^ ’n Z Mi -« ^ X o rsi M 0 1 M n ►- 82 O Mi 2 X m 4 X Mi O ►-• 5S fMs- 555^SS -i o X s -im i > »•- ■ * « ^ X "vv \ * .A\ ti>- '•>■ ■:*I'iiaSii' ! ■'«;..„'.-ii: ' 4|'>’:'-'-,. <»‘«iS®F .'■ •’:jj.,*,, ...... .,■^t My ky ■'' ‘ a:'A'. li-c -« In- ♦4*^ A ‘ .-».♦* .Jfc.*,* .JM* •**►'•-•»• ••■ •t. r"' ' •< >f*»<*.*• .-Ol • A*.*.’ M.' . -V• * '*' •- ■'' '■ ^.- ■ L ^ ■‘’' ’ -•• kji fa ■ * -• "'TV'' V" *■ - - 'T^ . ^ 'fy- r'^, y "v'- . ■ fepv#v^* \'.’^1 r’" 1 ■■■■•' ’ * -7^ *»■ ♦. 4^ ^ A* fb-fsp ':;,* 1 * *, *• ^ J-. “4#||;:..:. ■:^* n. r ^^L. mMmy - ' 'y'- _ ,,, « ■■ ..y -mm ^‘.y ^ « -■ I ■T-m :.‘i; .; T.V ,-*'* ■'- •' ■ ^•'•;#^.'>'|'.!fifiV‘ '. "’A-.''..'’. '■ 1^V- ti firtili' i Os i s +T "%.Uf .. r--»•*V •: M^ M ♦ . ^ — iry r -VI, - .,»• '■S *{•* - ^ r- >Vf# •»* .•*'9’'l/ ^ V..: .'« *• * , p%, -“nr • f ■ *1» * •-•»*••- •j >j.>J* .' f- < .4«^■.a ;:-:i... \/anCf -f jVw/7/JC /Sf D m i i "T:" I ”•t •f#•HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEETi-V y '-‘t.. / ^gj2ACK ZONE; (circle one) 0-75'^3-250' . • ♦.. c ifw It-': feiw. |*rft ■t- *v- 11.^^ ii^.. 250-500' 5G0-i000' Existing Hardcover in Zone A. House LENGTH ? r I <r B. Garage ZZ c. Driveway D. S’OEWALK (. De, *ATIO/Deck , :y A R. Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN IV PLASTIC sheeting s. Cthcr X — K — X - X WIDTH » ^ 2U Z o 22 n- 2* ri Total Hardcover in Zone To \L Pw^ERTY Area / r» s 33^ Z2^ I io G S.F. S.F. .F. /0 S.F. S.F. .F.® .F.® S.F. .y0 S.F. ^2^ S.F.® . ' —tn^-------- ^ hP JO *5 —— /t\ > 'iS S.F. S.F , S.F. S.F. s.f. (~ft1 5-oy^ 4 [i]_JiM±r: .■±m^s.f. m X 100 - ___To w.aL’J *«:!/ -•■ ■'-"st:" . V',..' ••'‘I’t’tr:.' <a» :3 '.J ■« * ‘ ^ VT K W-.i a Co ’^^ C'/s/Cu ■ >t ''', D^J ^ i»a— }i ■• •^'T rW-■- .. / »bh'. h''/ ' . ' -.V ■ ------------------------■>--— tV' «»*. p.:: %«■ :.r; - ■ - -,-■ R, 1:1:^^ •r*- r \o' (£/•• J **'- -N^ . . •* *• c d) . . k /4* ^ k i •i- . pU=1 r . ■V I t ■:^i ,;i- ’’Mmirnmi;'-f-;, f'mm^%■ %:, ■'. ■.«>■. iii-t 'if '. \ iete'-/‘■'rV ^ Sfc.; “ ■ mi ' > #4? ,v" %■■ Mm "r- W' i :■ W' '■ iv'- ■•<’•■ mimm ^ .;• .V-; - ■ > “- u- •V' r'- 'It' -v m, ' ■ mmmife.:-^:tv i* ."irv A . *^1 .n :i j • ., •* X ij :x :a 3une 25, 1992 ORONO CITY COUNCIL 1335 South Brown Road Orono, MN. Orono City Council Member/ To Whom It May Concern My name is Marvin Menth and I live at 2930 Casco Point Road, Orono, Minnesota. My next door neighbor, Mr. E. Leo Bullock, who lives at 29^0 Casco Point Road, Orono, MN. has applied for a Set-Back Variance. Please let this letter serve as acknowledgement that I have no cbjections to the variance. Sincerely, 2. Marvin E. Menth 2930 Casco Point Road Orono, MN ‘t 'f. .... 'Wk '•t aU.i,. ‘^■'1vii ^4 “ % i» _>-^ ;ri' I A-"'Si. K KnV •" m w^>n i3^ ^ ';?sr * w^ ’ ‘i ■ '•'■• imLW p 3^< 1 fh * ; ;« ^, \i r' -/ (if >->■* :« IV- ^I •> V*• .v«•‘^1 .X. ♦r «?.;/ ill*i ' -V 3fS II >^.K iliiji'l «yi^ • % i I • • > f . • 4 • * •'i • - 1-- ■»* ■ -*. “i ‘ '" ----- —--------- »■‘ ■•-.Ci » ^; ''*_■» *"y«^* ^ % ? - "-•^ ' iflf ^ H - ^ :S !------------------• - ► 1 ^ /•/ •* -- .* ? '• ■ ' ''^.>;o 1^ } Mip*« . rr^ ' • ■/■•'> ►r #'• r- 1 1 1 / ;-f.j \ ^ I V- » j I-.- - :^mrm mM-m Ew^’ sif? '• av't”' •• ', • f- -r I*' ^ A. - M ^ • .. V •' -..--I -.V ••Wi'c t|4a^:I . ▼/’xr r ^;r»^- 'i»^"»>» u- V ^• ■■ ‘a r -ht l;^^- - p- ks . -■ ";V V'; " X V-’ '-■p- t' w Chairman Kelley and Planning Conunission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator C *♦ Frons Date: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administra^ July 14, 1992 V Subject:#1756 Robert E. Wilson, 4156 Highwood Road - Variance - Public Hearing <>A /> \© Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.24, required. Required * Existing > Proposed * Variance « Subdivision 5 (B) - Side yard setback variance 10' 2’9* 2'9" 7'1"or 71% f. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - 0-75* setback area = 3,855 s Existing hardcover = 0 75-250* setback area * 7,680 Existing hardcover = 3,040 s.f. or 39.58% Proposed hardcover “ 3,040 s.f. or 39.58% j.f. List of Bxhibits - A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners Lisv D - 1-3 Hardcover Fact Sheets B - Survey Oeacription of Request Applicant proposes the replacement of a screened porch structure. The structure is in a severe state of disrepair. Applicant does not propose an expansion but just rebuxlding within existing envelope. No changes in hardcover are proposed nor is the side setback to be altered. Bardebip Stat Please refer to Exhibit A. The applicant notes the unsafe and unsightly condition of the structure in its present state. The residence purchased sometime in the 1940*s was constructed prior to required setback standards and any additions since were completed prior to the City's Shoreland Regulations were developed in 1973 through 1975. •V W; • '’ CIV y fZoning Pile 11756 ||it ^ July 23, 1992Pagtt 2iUUU.tional Comments and Planning Commission Recoannendatlon The applicant advi'^ed that he was unable to confirm at this point the exact extent of the structural repairs to the screened i|j|0]*cb' structure. Members asked applicant to confirm that the etsructure would not be expanded and Mr. Wilson confirmed that there was no plan to expand on the porch structure. The Planning Cowsission recommended unanimous approval of the variance as ^ ^ ^ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _*1 _ __^ ^ - r m!.: W‘ proposed by applicant. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning ission recommendation. ijmm p-'"’ mmMrn.m■m V:F 'mM ■^m 0m ■ 3' V ■■ ^ '‘-V tmte«r* SIS" ti L/-! I ' HV ! ' ■'*' ' * K';' ^ V \ -V-' A RBSOLOTION GRANTING VARIANCBS TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) PILE #1756 ft: W' mr*. si-' • • : - p: " Sis '-'r' fe: 5| • m^'V/* V ^ ? : fr_ _ t.:;- WHEREAS, Robert E. Wilson (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in the property located at 4156 Highwood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 23, Highwood Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Mir.ncsota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit the reconstruction of a three season screened porch located within the 75-250' setback area where there already exists excessive hardcover at 3,040 s.f. or 39.58% and only 25% is allowed and a variance to Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) seeking approval of a side setback variance as existing structure is located 2* 9" from the side property line instead of the required 10'. Orono, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1756. 2. The property is located in the LR-IB, Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 43,560 s.f. or 1 acre in area. The property consists of 11,535 s.f. or .26 acres. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 20, 1992 and recommended approval of the proposed varitii.tces based upon the following findings: A. The proposed structural improvements to the three season porch will not involve an expansion of the structure. Page 1 of 4 A >1*. * 4. 5. B.The residence was constructed in the early 1940's prior to setback requirements and prior to the City's shoreland regulations developed in 1973-75. C.The City has received no written or oral comments from adjacent property owners. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City, The City Council has considered th 3 application including the findings and recomme i-i itions of the Planning Commission, reports by City stair, comments by the applicant and the effect of the variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLOSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or City Council hereby grants Section 10.22, Subdivision three season porch located excess of hardcover exists 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) as the side lot line instead following conditions: more of the above findings, the Orono a variance to Municipal Zoning Code 2 permitting structural repairs of a in the 75-250' setback area where an at 39.58% and a variance to Section porch structure is located 2' 9" from of the required 10', subject to the 1.Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (July 27, 1993). Page 2 of 4 kr' fe to' ft'- ft'm ‘■t* ->!'•./ ^ % . t Y" 2.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 3.The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, other owners of the property, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Minnesota 1992. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of July, ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Robert B. Wilson STATE OF MINNESOTA } )ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of July 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 4 mz:V.--. »^>r.■■*».«.'. i^Y'H STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. jf ^1 _ COONTY OF HENNEPIN } d f f 19 9 Stf‘''bmtore ne a Notary Public within and for said county, personally •ppaared known to me to be executed the foregoing ^Liartrawntr^and^^i^^ he (they) executed the same as bis (their) free act and deed. te' m-y - " NOTARY PUBLIC MmM. bmm' dfATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. IHTY of HENNEPIN )•^•11 ir ' H >*•>■•. : On this _ day of - - - - - - - - --- -before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the B’ BSrsonU) described in and who executed the foregoing instrum^t, sad acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. t ' ■pi: NOTARY PUBLIC p- tr^' - Page 4 of 4 ?>• ■h--\ :V> iV- A& *; N , ft ft'--/ #■'«i 5(/ ’ ^ M ^/f CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION HS Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) £✓ r * V“o I t" T ¥ t f*li/T C 1 # I w» i.»MC-lTU ‘ T=^•. •rv.v./iiT) »fV 1 'ucrk' 71 175, *75 PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address 4l^C^ t" RofiA: U • li. I i» A f ^ 0 fCu ^ rA,M ,%Af T.‘» V UVS/A nVA # V*/ T*w-i Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) "11i “J . f j Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired /HHI (month/year) I (do)(do not), also own th^ adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property; residential _ _other(specify) Zoning District; ^ ^ 1 ^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT Name ?.4pkV (? V.OA^ckJ Phone (home) IJ. ^ Phone (work) U 1^ ~ ^ ^ Address; 4-1 S(^ H OWNER (if different than applicant) City; (1A6U/l.i>_____ Zip; S Phone (home) 4 77? - Name £ S (i)t(<.^)hJ Phone (work) Address; ^ City; »<PC<A/a _________Zip DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ ^OC'.3(3 Describe request in detail; k 1_QCH lIl VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Lot Coverage tx^Setback;Front Side Hardcover _ _ Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DBSCRIPTION OF ONUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual propert'^ r<gpt fy L(/h 'M'' U^a WL XiJE? UIIUUE? J. *. .*.^«* --------- ----------------------- conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements; /ii.I/; i< mV A t>p<,C -f-u' hn-M-H'i nfi’i-fr. ~)h-.A <^rf///x;4 hrif K , -rh/> <!trUiTI il .1 ’V'. ■ Kr' K''r 1^ ! W:,i. i^--r.; Vf :s iTkr i' (attach additional sheets if necessary)RBQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted by the application date order for yoor application to be considered complete; 1. yj Completed Application Form 2. _ _^Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3* Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4^ yy Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8*j"xll" for reproduction). 5, _^Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy SH^xll"). 6. _Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%"xll'*). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8, _^Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this remember that your variance application is not information has not been included. application. Please lete if the above APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of tnis application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the b^t of his/her )cnowledge. Applicant ’s Signature r\()wl Date ONMERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowiedges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature :lon or this requ^t. Date io~7.C Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month.* Applicants must be present at all scheduled review seetings of the Planning Ccnmission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 4 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. f • #- - ^ ■■ 'i'r P'^ •: r-.\ u>; 56^9»4» o» <J»; 5 T rinO • ‘ . ' m . .-./ .* . Ji (o!o) va ? ^orchard bi?y>< pls \ / \ cJ - pm w 'A 5i?A-. =^*V t 4. .J — 9 f:3 - K 39 /H/ 4il|v ?rcT / »&tt ? s ftl >M.S l/i ^ l»4. I i1 J 8( d 7^ WA %4 ^ \iv.^ 'j *i 'IT j4 5. 5\«i \£ «o r U is aUv\ ifV * # . • ^v^** ^ Vo \ CD :!• »- iSM mm - ---• -r'p-.fey ■' £'■'■''• '.' ■ ”'5 ■i% ^ »4 > .• / m '., y . '>2*' . •’■ ■'■ i- • t • ••|tv I\‘- .\.y? •:V -■ ■v/*'V ;■'•■ l^■■ ‘■::'-y t* > # % Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone T1 O • ^ HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET setback zone : (circle one ) (^7^ 75-250 Existing Hardcover in Zone ♦ 0 % ^ ^ • • A * Vinn^F ^ « 250-500' • • ♦ 500-1000' S.F. LENGTH WIDTH ••• « • • X ♦ S.F. ••• . .. X • • S.F. • ^ • • • • * X • S.F. • •-• . . »•• X ._ S.F. a fnAPANP X S.F. • • • $¥• • r PoiVFWAY X • S.F. X m • S.F. * . • •• • n. *%inPWAl X ■ X • S.F. X S.F. • * X -r S.F. E. Jatio / Deck X • • • • * • ■S.F. 9 • c 1 Awn<;rAPP X • S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN BY X ^ -S.F. PLASTIC-------------- • ; sheeting X S.F. • y , -S.F. • » G. Other x —:-------------S.F. S.F. B 3fS5 X 100 - .- •«. »• W' 3^S5 t s.f. H I^-l /o <1 <v4 A ■i1 / :« 1- •k 4 ■:i r -’v • PC:> •• k-’&vte;«-...ill E ' .» \ 'r.:. IS-'I' ?-.V ■Afi' i- iivv - ■iX>:<T-^. ife ‘jf.s »(»??<.'■ M[>-C... .iKv •'i-?vm #• tivS-; Ife:"-Ifc- ■ •-•: r' .’ -PP.^ ^d,;- 1*^/1 rcf/\^ HARDCOVER CALCULATIOH WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' (75-250^ 250-500' 500-1000 Existing Hardcover in Zone # * •• • A. House % • 7 r. 35-X 2r.J ^S€S.F, • • • length /<f.y X width /T:35- • ZY6 . S.F. • n.9 X 7. /S2 '/ZC • • S.F. r///2.8 X • • y. f • S.F. # X • ^ • • • • S.F. • B. Garage • *. • 2^. J # X %y.2 zz? t S.F. * • • #r* c. D riveway ci^0co A-#* *'/ y. 7 3 5^c? r<e: * /^\ ”9 x ^ D. . Sidewalk :________ x_____ C^tJr. ^fr. CujUL Z2.S >r <3.7 j. rra^jf caj^il T9 x <7. 7 • // ' ' /8" y /. 3 _ _ _ _;_ _ _ _X_ _ _ _E. Patio/3eck _ _ _ _ _' X_ _ _ _ /€ CZ. Z3 F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY ‘ t PLASTIC SHEETING - X 4M «*a • * •<•«• /€,S y a.7 ' S cute 6 • 3*f X y2 iuema rrrt'f y V 3.5 «^««0 fn^f G. Other 2.2.X 2. 9 • /y ? Total Hardcover in Zone 3c</o Total Property A rea in Zone 7^80 S.F. S.F. 7/ ^ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. /2 /y S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. P-B 7 <80 X 100 J^.S8 h--^ tio B » - •• r *w* !■% • ' • i :i .A / 6nt' ••'te !'i. I' ,lv .■■ ■ -. p= »"<«■, r. •-■*» IW^'^r'-: « • (si '-- ft ,».'■' ' m'■ ■ \ V,». ■’.•* ■ gs& ii;A*v ,t1' V. , V • ■ w”- -J 5 . ft teiSfe i P,f%-' ■ ■ ■ 3%. ;''^^ . fa *y®!’S ■ ■?py> r,’«-••'• gf^M Kv ‘■fef PW#Vv"'- .t. ;, ^ ••t ^ ^;:v:... P’" te'^ ■ * H-fc ■ fe. ,v. ^7^-^ -T^A^HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET _ _ _ Sc73ACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' (^50-500^ 500-1000 Existing Hardcover in Zone A. House a. Garage c. Driveway D.. Sidewalk / E. Patio/ Deck F.Landscape AREAS underlain BY ■ t , plastic sheeting G. Other LENGTH « 0 • m X WIDTH Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone B 2S X 100 mM S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. b .) V** ^ -1 i i 4 B •••« • • 0 ^3 0'^ ' i ■ X‘--;-Lr :'ti':r '.'Pir^'If: ‘,kV’ B t k/.-i. r ir*'- •'1 te^. ... S' ?u^ i-’■•'■ • ^ M' W', ^t:c iP %3 \Z'/o Tot Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator :% /> ProBi Michael P. Gaffronr Asst. Planning & Zoning Administn^to % ■% Dates Subjects July 21, 1992 Proposed Ordinance - Styrofoam Dock Flotation List of Bzhlbits A - Ordinance Draft Revised Per Planning Commission Recommendation B - LMCD Minutes 7/11/92 C - Memo and Exhibits 7/15/92 Discussion This proposed ordinance to eliminate the use of non-encased bead styrofoam for dock flotation purposes, was initiated by the Lake Use Committee. A public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on July 20th, and a number of members of the public cononented, including two marina operators. (A copy of the draft minutes of that hearing are attached). Zaitial Draft The ordinance draft reviewed by the Planning Commission is attached to the July 15th memo. The specifics of that draft included: - identification of floating styrofoam beads as a visual nuisance - definition of "non-encased styrofoam" - application to both private and commercial docks - three year phase-out of existing unprotected styrofoam - okay to use other homogenous foams - allowed use of encased beads in bulk Dublic/Agency The LMCD on July 11th suggested that the styrofoam ban pertain to al~ structures placed in the lake, not just docks. LMCD further suggested elimination of the staged phase-out, employing a single deadline date for styrofoam removal. Beth Whittaker of Minnetonka Boat Works and Jim Dunn of Lakeside Marina both commented that the expense of replacement of their entire dock system would make the proposed three year phase-out quite burdensome• Their additional comments included: - Both have relatively new foam supported docks approximately t'-’o years old, with an expected ten year life span for such docks. - Dunn suggested we contact Prof. Warmley at UW-Madison who is an expert on marina construction and management. ... .... Memo July 21, 1992 Page 2 For Minnetonka Boat Works, complete changeover would be in the range of $40,000 to $50,000 just for materials, and significant additional expense for labor due to the integration of services and utilities into the dock system (electricity, water, gasoline, etc.). The problems with breakup of styrofoam billets by ice action might be minimized by proper management, i.e. pulling the spud poles, careful monitoring of ice conditions, etc. 'n/ *■ Comments from members of the public present indicated that they agreed the styrofoam problem does exist. Leo Bullock suggested that floating conta'*nment booms be required during the interim for those marinas maintaining unprotected styrofoam. Robert Wilson commented to staff after the hearing that his company installs docks, and has had litter and disinteg^ ',tion problems with bead styrofoam on occasion. Please review the draft minutes of the public hearing. t' V: r*.Planning CcwBiasion Reconnendation w-Planning Commission on a vote of 3 to 1 recommended that all future use of non-encased styrofoam for dock flotation be banned. On a vote of . in favor, 1 abstention. Planning Commission recommended that existing users of such product ahould be required to eliminate the non-encased styrofoam. 1; ■ Planning Commission generally felt that there should be one final deadline date, rather than incremental reductions each year, and further suggested that five years would be a more reasonable ^ime table • Planning Commission agreed that the ordinance should be applied to both private and commercial docks throughout the entire City and that the ordinance apply all to floating structures, not just docks. This would then include swim platforms, floating waDcways, etc. Regarding enforcement. Planning Commission suggested that during the five year "grace period", strong public relations and public education efforts be commenced to inform residents and commercial operators of the requirements and deadline dates. With a strong information program, voluntary compliance is more likely and will lead to less need for strict enforcement after the deadline. It was also suggested that a fine be imposed for non-compliance, and for marinas that licenses be withheld if compliance is not gained. wm -- -J A,"'*.RrT p-.v:lr%; MemoJuly 21, 1992 Page 3 Planning Commission agreed that it would be appropriate to Incorporate a requirement that for the interim, the owners of styrofoam dock systems should be required to do regular cleanup and/or containment of floating beads during the times of year when bead litter is most prevalent. Staff Reel iMf ndation Staff has drafted a revised ordinance (attached reflecting the Planning Commission recommendations, original language appears in the 7/15/92 memo packet. as Exhibit A) A copy of the Staff will be contacting Prof. Warmley as suggested by Dunn. Also, regarding the "fine" proposed by Planning Commission, while we may have the option to incorporate a "fine" system as part of the ordinance, that would be separate from the standard violation tag process. Under our standard process, violation of any part of the zoning code is a misdemeanor, with standard maximum penalty of 90 days In jail and $700 fine. Under this process, we would write a tag and then have the City Attorney lequest the judge to impose significant penalties if the violation is not resolved in a reasonable period. This likely is as effective as any separate system of fines we might consider. Council is requested to review the revised ordinance, make additional revisions if appropriate, and adopt the ordinance per the revised draft or direct scaff to redraft for your August 10th meeting. fe ■ m r.V • .. 'K F*'Mr^ r-' >;>;■-^?.-- fr-J ; il' ■r k ^‘'‘ I/’ it V k ■'tr: • ^■ ^y>- j.-- Wii- fe. r- k' ^=.v: •■r '•' %- 7 ORDINANCE i AN ORDINANCE TO A SECOND SERIES THE MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.56, BY ADDING SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 17 (T) PROHIBITING THE USE OF NON-ENCASED STYROFOAM AS A DOCK FLOTATION DEVICE The City Council of Orono ordains as follows The Municipal Code of the City of Orono is amended by adding Ordinance # , Second Series: Section 1. Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.56, Subdivision 17 is amended by adding Subsection (T) to read as follows: (T); Floating docks and platforms. Because the disintegration of non-encased styrofoam dock flotation blocks leads to floating styrofoam beads washing up onto the shoreline, causing a visual blight on the shoreland landscape, and thereby creating a public nuisance, the use of non-encased styrofoam blocks, sheets, or billets for dock and platform flotation is prohibited subject to the following regulations: 1."Non-encased styrofoam " means any brand of expanded polystyrene beads molded into a block, sheet, or billet or other shape that does not have a permanent casing, covering or coating which would eliminate disintegration of the molded block, sheet, or billet into individual beads or chunks as a result of ice action, animals or normal activity by dock users. 2.This ordinance applies to all private and commercial docks, swimming platforms and other similar structures, regardless whether such structures are permanent or seasonal in nature. 3.No new permanent *;r seasonal docks, platforms, or similar lake structures using non-encased styrofoam blocks, sheets or billets for flotation, shall be constructed after the date of adoption of this ordinance . 4.The owners of any existing permanent or seasonal dock, platform, or other lake structure constructed with non- encased styrofoam shall discontinue use of the non- encased styrofoam as a flotation device no later than than January 1, 1997. mm »M. - . - - w'if*'u-:.y.;'^WHI'^’- Bi-'J&kk- 5.The use of urethane foams, isocyanurate foams, or other types of foam flotation blocks which are homogenous and which will not normally breakdown into individual beads, is specifically not prohibited. 6.Molded or non-molded expanded polystyrene beads in bulk may be used as a dock and platform flotation device only when completely enclosed in a sealed container capable of withstanding ice action, animals or normal activity by dock users. 7. (if T^'- During the interim period after the adoption of this ordinance but before the January 1, 1997 deadline, the owners of any permanent or seasonal dock, platform or other lake structure using non-encased styrofoam as a flotation device shall be required to provide suitable containment measures and regular shoreline cleanup as necessary to eliminate the public nuisance created by floating styrofoam beads. Section 2. Adoption and publication. This ordinance shall take effect and shall be enforced from and after the date of its passage and publication. Adopted by the City Council of Orono on this 1992, by a vote of _ _ _ _ ayes and _ _ _ _ nays' day of Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Ballin, city Clerk ft ■■ Ij,rv. . .. A-J ■•.VITfV ii^v- ■ li^;: rv'. z ■’■V MIf4UTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEcTINGHELD JULY 20, 1932 The Orono Planning Commission met on the c ^>ve rLl^r ^Ed following members present: planning Commiss on ® t^ib Cohen, Candace Rowlette. Jeff Johnson, and btephen following were absent: Charlie Kelley, Maureen Be o-s and rharles Schroeder. The following represented the ..ity Starr. Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron. and ^?®o * Acting Chair Cohen called the meeting to order at 7.00 p.m. (#1) #1749 JAMES F. LAWRENCE. 1550 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - PUBLIC HEARING 7:00 - 7:04 P.M. The Affldavlt of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. James Lawrence was present. Mabusth explained that this is a subdivision of I ewood , frorth^tr'lbuta^y' weckman has confirmed that the snared septic a record of a conditional use permit for the guest house. S If this should be a condition of approval. All Members agreed that the owner should apply for a conditional use permIt. A motion was made by Rowlette, seconded by ,7n “cT^th ;'’‘’"«'‘No?Jn*’’for‘'pVeTimtna^y lubdivTston acp'r“oval Object'to a e^^Su.onaf JseTerSu ;:ing Ippllsd for and granted for the guest house use. Ayes 4, nays 0. (•2) ZONING CODE AMENDMENT STANDARDS FOR '''h.RESIDENTIAL ^KS THAT EMPLOY STYROFOAM FOR FLOTATION PURPOSE^ ?J!:^^^.“of®=PubncVtf^^^^^^ certificate of Mailing were i.nted. Gaffron explained that this °doc'k"s*"“e "s%"2t."d use of "0"-«"'«**'',,V//°to'’??;e shoreVa;d re^ thatordinance IS an addition to^th.shorel^ g^ complaint of marina W«?s"s t^at the styrofoam docks will be expensive to replace and 2 1/2 years Is not a realistic timeframe. . V.,.’ >: y. .±«iaiLjou V y — r' minutes of the orono planning commission meeting HELD JULY 20, 1992 STYROFOAM ORDINANCE - CONT. Jim Dunn. Uakeshore Marina, noted that "I® Styrofoam docks after approval from the LMCD, DNR, and the Watershed District. He felt che key to foam Is the design. He reported that they loose less than a wastebasket full per year. He said that management of the system Is a key Issue. He felt the City has not done enough homework on the Issue. Beth Whittaker, Minnetonka Boat Wor.ks, stated they added to their styrofoam docks three years ago after the necessary approve s. feU that the timeframe and the expense will be major '^sues• She felt that more research could be done, including .S options to prevent the foam from breaking up. ^he stated it would probably cost approxImateIv $50,000 plus labor to change the .docks. Dunn said removal of the docks would be labor intensified because utilitios built into tho docks. Whittaker felt that it was not viable to replace just ^ a dock as the buoyancy of the replacement section may not match the remaining styrofoam docks. Jabbour stated his concern about this issue. He challenged Mr. Dunn on the amount of pollution caused by the foam. He noted that at a recint meeting with the LMCD. ne brought a piece of asked it to be passed around the room. It was considerab f--— after being passed around. Also, algae grows on the styrofoam, which the ducks and muskrats feed on. Ho stated three years unreasonable for replacement. He felt that the economic reasons are 1 ns 1gnificant. Dunn stated that the City has not done its homework on the Issue. Jabbour reported that he has talked to Dow Chemical, attend d to 4-5 marina International shows, talked f®? I hydrodam on the river, and have located many other alternatives on the issue. E. Leo Bullock, 2940 Casco Point Road, asked If anything was being done to collect the debris such as a silt fence. Dunn said they currently do not have a collector system Whittaker noted she is not opposed to workins * j?! or Staff on this issue. She felt they were not given f" to he*o draft the ordinance. She noted that the imp schedule is too restrictive. V' ^ r W-* -■ \ X J *. V' V'.:-:r'. T 4 ■» m u : n' ■H. n- fi &:'; ■ t •' ' >' ,_1 . ' /■ • '■ • . . (' ''?•• fe, ‘ *'t MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 20, 1992 STYROFOAM ORDINANCE - CONT. '’**r*wMch'appIars t^wo?k ve?y°weM .^^^asked 'Jhe 00"“^!?e?enc! bl?2;.n the ancaVed system and the non-encased system. Whittaker noted they saved major dollars by using non-encased styrofoam. . +Ka I Mm rficommends banning al I styrofoam °?'ric?Cre"'oTt*he LaU a^d* sWjests eHminating the partia. dhange out to one final deadline date. Rowlette asked the life expecta-oy of the docks. SuMdtp tn ^Ve 's"y‘ro?oar I ,'°he^*ps ”hear thi" PreVko^^f ' Tul styrofoam. Gatfron asked the Commission to review the questions poised in his cn0fno • .1 Rowlette Cohen and Peterson anreed that all future use of non- eicased styrofoam for dock flotation be banned. •3 Cohen stated he felt that there should be one final deadline, five years from adoption. Rowlette felt that some marina owners may try to use deteriorating Soei se^lons UP until the final deadline date. Peterson didn’t think that economic reasons were acceptable. ♦hat th» ordinance should apply to both «4 am Members agreed that the orainante Lmmerelal and residential properties. .4 that finas should be Imposed for non- ”nf*oVm.n^r*n wrsTugge‘sred /net marina licenses be withheld for non-comp 11ance. ♦ Ha mailina to Infom the residents of the City of Cohen suggested a maiiing t the new ordinance. Habuath asked If the ordinance should apply to ail styrofoam structures. .m ' ' A * A 1 ^,;:v-’’«4:rt ■■, ^iiv 4? *'* ' >v, ■ iv< ,r». i£ M ■vrj'jr, .vii V....|ito |6«# £.i^- i?r V?K-%MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGHELD JULY 20, 1992 \ STYROFOAM ORDINANCE - CONT. All Members agreed that It should. Jabbour noted that the Issue has been researched by the City for the last two years, and stated that the proposed ordinance was sent to all marina owners for review prior to the public hearing. Gaffron asked If the ordinance should be al t-encompaesing. ipUtrU^er CcM^xm^f^ £U0U<-C» A /2^COM*v«€.>oJb47-roM TH^ Cohen felt It should not be aLI■encom^aesIng« 'TfH^ CeCOMi^OMbAnCwvX Giv^ Foti^ (#3) #1746 THOMAS 4 MARGARET LOWE, 2830 WEST LAFAYETTE ROAD - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 7:05 - 7:17 P.M The AffidavIt of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Thomas Lowe was present. Mabusth explained that a major portion of the residence is located in the 0-75’ zone. The applicants are proposing a 26x21.8’ addition to the southeast corner of the residence, and the removal of 740 s.f. of existing landscape area underlain with plastic and the removal of a 176 s.f. accessory structure to be relocated in the 75-‘250* setback area. Lowe clarified that he is proposing to move the accessory structure on his second lot. He asked that the tennis court be excluded from the hardcover calculations as It Is a clay court and allows water to pass through it. Mabusth noted that the City cons I ders cl ay courts as hardcover. She stated an existing portion of the residence Is closer to the lake than the proposed addition. Rowlette stated she had a 0-75* zone. problem with additional hardcover In the Lowe said that this Is the only feasible location for the addition. the 0-75*Mabusth noted the proposal decreases the hardcover In zone from 19.6X to 18.9X. Cohen added that applicants are proposing structural hardcover for non—hardcover. He felt tnis is not an adequate trade. * I : 4. .: ^ -j.-- I# 11'. • •fv*' rl h‘ "%T-'m: 'r-ifcv- J#r' Pi' WATER STRUCTURES COMMITTEE July 11, 1992 Hurr noted the license approvals on Site I and Site 2 were based on there being a valid CUP with the City of Wayzata. MOTION: Hurr moved, Rascop seconded, to recommend approval of the revised plan for the Wayzata Yacht Club Site 2, conditioned on a valid CUP existing between the Yacht Club and the City of Wayzata, and subject to meeting all LMCD dock license Codes with no boat storage on the platform. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. 4. Styrofoam in Dock Construction (Orono Ordinance) The committee received a copy of an ordinance proposed by the City of Orono prohibiting the use of non-encased styrofoam as a dock flotation device. Babcock suggested adding "including but not limited to" to the last line of Section 1. Items 1 and 5. Hurr and Rascop indicated an interest in adopting a similar ordinance. Grathwol said the LMCD should get the benefit of Orono*s public hearings before making a decision. Thibault reported white Bear Lake Conservation District has no ordinance, but it did establisli a policy requiring replacement of styrofoam docks over a period of time as a condition of ap proval for dock licenses. Hurr said she believes the I/l/-9^ date in the Orono Ordi nance is too soon. She would prefer a^longer period of time for the dock owners to comply. Babcock—arid Markus thought a three year conversion date would be reasonable with a restriction prohibiting use of non-encased styrofoam for new construction of structures on Lake Minnetonka. There was discussion of the use of styrofoam in other struc tures on the lake such as swimming platforms. The consensus of the committee is that styrofoam, unless encased, should be banned from the Lake. The City of Orono is to be forwarded a cony of this meet ing's minutes, recommending to the Board that LN CD favor banning non-encased styrofoam from the lake on anjy structures placed in the Lake. The committee further recommends the Board approve deletion of 3.a and 3.b in the Ordinance, keeping 3.c requiring elimination of non-encased styrofoam by 1/1/95. 5. Storage of Commercial Watercraft at Residential Sites (Green wood Ordinance) The committee received a copy of the City of Greenwood Ordinance prohibiting the storage of commercial watercraft in R-1 and R-2 residential districts. Babcock noted the Ordinance does not apply to rental oi private dock spaces. He also noted the Ordinance is basically limited to charter boats by the reference to the watercraft having its own captain and crew. .... Grathwol said this, again, uses the word commercial m a context different than t‘ 't used by the LMCD. The committee asked staff to forward copies of the Greenwood ordinance to the other cities and a.sk for their comments. 21- ■'A-f-. .11. .J it ^ a* IkaAfa*• -_. •* ;V-myr^y i/ ■.IV l y tyy TO: •!i‘i : .V Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: DATE: Michael P. Gaffron» Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator July 15, 1992 SUBJECT: Proposed Zoning Code Amendment - Styrofoam Dock Flotation SuBODBary t As a result of complaints by lakeshore property owners and at the request of the Lake Use Committee, staff has drafted an ordinance providing for the elimination of non-encased bead type styrofoam used for dock flotation purposes. The problem with such material is that ^he styrofoam beads break off in chunks or individually from the styrofoam blocks, and float around the lake typically accumulating on the windward shorelines. This creates an aesthetic nuisance, although the MPCA doesn't seem to think this creates any degradation of water quality. The proposed ordinance provides for a 3 year phase-out of unencased styrofoam used for docks. fe-.; List of Exhibits A - Proposed Ordinance Draft B - Letter from MPCA 4/10/92 C - Product Literature on One Possible Alternative (This is not an endorsement) .0-biSCUSSiOA :V'- •'I”. • V- The Impetus for the proposed ordinance is the styrofoam bead accumulations with which a number of lakeshore property owners have had to contend. The most visible sources have been from Minnetonka Boat Works and Lakeside Marina, with lesser amounts apparently coming from Windward Marina. The bead accumulations resulting in complaints have been mainly in Tanager Lake and the south shore of Maxwell Bay. ^ere are likely a number of private docks also using styrofoam. K-‘- There are foam products on the market that are not formed from expanded polystyrene beads. Generally, these homogenous foams such as urethane foam or isocyanurate foam, do not break do%m into individual beads or chunks of beads, and have not become apparent as a problem. Logic, then, suggests that styrofoam bead products either need to be eliminated from use or altered/encased to eliminate the litter problem. SiiLS*' I'm::- ^ ■' t-^ w :4 f' Memo July 15, 1992 Page 2 The breakdown of the foam into individual beads apparently occurs either through ice action in the spring or wildlife activities such as geese, ducks and muskrats which like to chew on the styrofoam. The MPCA and the DNR have not concluded that ingestion of the beads and subsequent elimination causes any problems for the wildlife. To remedy the problem, a number of choices might include: 1. Replace the bead styrofoam with some other form of flotation. 2.Coat or encase the styrofoam blocks in a protective covering which eliminates their introduction to the water. This might include some sort of protective spray coating, placement of the blocks within some type of bin or barrel structure, or even reuse of the existing styrofoam in bead or chunk form within some watertight barrel or case. The following comments from various parties, including Orono BUirina operators, are offered for Planning Commission's consideration: 1.There are various grades of bead styrofoam, and use of the higher grades might reduce the magnitude of the problem. 2.Replacement of an entire marina dockage system is an expensive proposition, and the January 1995 timeframe proposed is not realistic for the two marinas (Lakeside and Minnetonka Boat Works) which have recently constructed new docks supported by bead styrofoam. 3,The 3 year phase-out is unrealistic, in that at the time a dock owner chooses to replace the flotation, entire dock sections must be done at once due to the high probability that any replacement product will have different flotation characteristics (the docks will have hills and valleys). As currently drafted, all private and commercial docks would be subject to the ordinance. Various parties have suggested that in addition to docks, the ban should also include any other floating structures such as swim platforms, walkways, etc. I The 3 year phase-out language was constructed such that the City Is^does not need to do an inventory up front. Rather, at any time after B'" sach incremental deadline a dock was found to exceed the maximum allowable proportion of styrofoam bead flotation, such dock would not be in compliance. In the event that a dock had multiple fingers or slips, for instance say 6 fingers, it would be reasonable to expect that 2 of the 6 fingers would be replaced each year, rather than 1/3 of each finger each year. (This question came up at a Lake Use Committee meeting.) mu *■ s'-WM-: m-w >Ci>A y,i l»'''v :'♦B. H:: Ps: r. t- .■ Hc^i^ ^i.. m^x-: m^:' te*i^'' rn'r :■ ?*“/■: >■ . -r'-^ mm' ,.v<,'' ■■ ^n'.C' #-r. - [f’: jwrf.r ?VH{..''' WrX'i- kf';, '.'■ '■Sf!!-w- il’J p-W,\Pm. il^Vy f W‘TMemoJuly 15, 1992 Page 3 Issues for Discussion The Planning Commission should answer the following questions in determining whether the proposed ordinance as drafted is necessary and appropriate: 1.-I 2. 3. Should all future use of non-encased styrofoam for dock flotation be banned? Should existing users of such product be required to eliminate non-encased styrofoam? X $ r^A/es If so, what is an ^appropriate and reasonable time table for removal to occur? Should there be one final deadline date,VG'S or is the incremental reduction appropriate?A--o 4.Should the ordinance apply to private as well as commercial docks throughout the entire City? ye3 5.Does Planning Commission have any recommendation as to the degree of enforcement this subject deserves? i.e. Is an annual survey of docks reeded (extremely time consuming), or would this be enforced only on a complaint or "catch-as- catch can" basis? STlioAJ d, P(^ Staff Reconnendation *Srn^ i C T £T Aj e T" Planning Commission is advised to review the proposed ordinance and, if the ordinance is determined to be appropriate, recommend any changes which you feel might make it more appropriate, reasonable, and fair to both those who must ultimately replace docks and those who must put up with their litter. //UO-. y^L ~ (2.^0U't^€ L-Jl+O lAAv^ F v A^ pc Co^TA.-ffO^em'T /A-' / • I'.,-fI >>.r'fe. kiMr ■tP^-‘ EiS^ ORDINANCE #SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.56, BY ADDING SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 17 (T) PROHIBITING THE USE OF NON-ENCASBD STYROFOAM AS A DOCK FLOTATION DEVICE -5\ V-I'ii. ^^,v-The City Council of Orono ordains as follows: The Municipal Code of the City of Orono is amended by adding Ordinance #_____, Second Series: t?- i i mp’-.ii. .■> mi 1^. g,.- m mm- L/ 'l.Am ;r> Section 1. Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.56, Subdivision 17 is amended by adding Subsection (T) to read as followsi (T)t Floating docks as platforms. Because the disintegration of styrofoam dock flotation blocks leads to floating styrofoam beads washing up onto the shoreline, causing a visual blight on the shoreland landscape, and thereby creating a public nuisance, the use of non-encased styrofoam blocks or sheets for dock and platform flotation is prohibited subject to the following regulations: "Non-encased styrofoam " means any brand of expanded polystyrene beads molded into a block, sheet or other shape that does not have a permanent casing, covering or coating which would eliminate disintegration of the molded block or sheet into individual beads or chunks as a result of ice action, animals or normal activity by dock users. 2.This ordinance applies to all new, private and commercial dock construction, regardless whether such dock is permanent or seasonal in nature, occurring after the date of adoption of this ordinance. 3.The owners of any existing permanent or seasonal dock constructed with non-encased styrofoam shall discontinue use of the non-encased styrofoam as a flotation device per the following compliance schedule: 3 •No more than 2/3 of the length of a given dock may be supported by non-encased styrofoam after January 1, 1993. b.No more than 1/3 of the length of a given dock may be supported by non-encased styrofoam after January 1, 1994. c.No portion of any dock may be supported by non- encased styrofoam after January 1, 1995. " mi ?!tr.. -ij>—w .A.It linirmJto 111 1 Vi»f- *' .'LU^rr. • ^vv . ;t‘.S’'to.u-W^' iii". rf' to^r >'^v ■ r-’h 4.The use of urethane foams, isocyanurate foams, or other types of foam flotation blocks which are homogeneous and which will not normally break down into individual beads, is specifically not prohibited. P-: ■ mm0: 5.Molded or nonmolded expanded polystyrene beads in bulk may be used as a dock flotation device only when completely enclosed in a sealed container capable of withstanding ice action, animals or normal activity by dock users. fev-.'-. l^ection 2. Adoption and publication. This ordinance shall take effect and shall be enforced from and after the date of its passage and publication. Adopted by the City Council of Orono on this 1992, by a vote of _ _ _ _ ayes and _ _ _ _ nays day of Ui- Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk ‘•S t; tS- - f,. ■ r <r\ . ■ I., ■■'my mm ■ ■■ 4 [T vi'^v:' ■"t®‘f:^•t-*. &*■'i'P'^: .'•V r^it t.-i p.1- >• K%- r,<^- L'-J'-..m ■■ ’ y/ I*'!' •, ■"* / fr U.. tu ■Ji r. >■; fe.Ifk'k fe, iLjyfe.. m- MinnesotB Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road. Saint Paul. Minnesota 55155*3898 Telephone (612) 296-6300 April 10» 1992 M«. Rachel Thlbolt Lain ttinnetonkt Conservation District 900 Raft Vayzata Boulavard Oayiatat Minnesota 55391 Dear Ml. Thlboltt You hav# raquostod the Agency position on pollution from docks constructed vlth styrofoam. We not avare of any water quality degradation associated uith •tyrofoan* There Is esthetic pollution, especially on beaches, which results from the physical breakup of the styrofoam. In an Ideal situation the Agency would vork towards a totally pollution free environment* However, in reality ve have not pursued regulation of pollution at the level of this particular situation. There are a number of reasons for this. 1.Minnesota statutes do have broad descriptions of pollution which could be interpreted to cover this or similar situations but ve have never been given legislative mandates or Agency Board directives to pursue them. 2.Our main effort to raise the esthetic issue has been with container deposit legislation which, I am sure you are avare, has been repeatedly defeated. 3.Ve have limited resources and staff and therefore have to devote then to issues with the greatest environmental impact* For example the impact of septic tanks on lakes is considerable but virtually all regulation is carried out by the counties. auMsary, while we favor local efforts to deal with this situation, ve do not have the regulatory tools to support your efforts. Sincerely, Harold J. Viagner, Biologist Assessment and Planning Section Water Quality Division UJWijae %M.ky J: .. . . • * • ■m' Si ^ ■[ if 3 S’ 2i 3 o i. g. a f? I ^^ ft> s. *< i r ^ c. "»to “» -3 2. “ 3 Sc a <8 q g 5 |- ^ ?■ %■ s I S Vi92m (» o ?' «, 9- oS- c a(t w w 35. 3 s n C/: C 5 r r) -• o 2 =» ?•-• -9 s 5* ^ ^ E i; 2j wcj « SI ■? s. - X i X • > i^ w* rr ^ rz % X nnr ^ |M ’X. -i3 X r X =r - H- T f —s O. 3. 3 7T J a TT 3 -1 y- y» y.v< - ^ ^ n- ^. •< X — - 33 /<^ ^ -j §■ 5 (/} 3 ^3 ZZko ST 3 < X X X “ X X y if:. X 3 S ® t X X 3 '<6 -1o S*«o ^=q- = =~ 5-- = r:^sc7 S = r. 3 1 ^ 3 r i is-^. 553“ -^:?5=^--~ 3 -j, rr • *1 X X -jr X. < ?P X SJ 3 C («» 2Ji X 7T O I T tJ 3 U5 o X *3 % • i 3 <3 5' 3. Si T 3* “ 2 O 3* ^ />s 3 X-c J/> '/\ \ -•aV.y>''J # ^ i'-.l •* f* ▲,Y /i IinrV ‘■■'ll:,.Jm mm O ^ 5 E 5- =S- Oq f I — c mmath 9<t»^ mt ~* • r f >fV" * ■ *■<* V*''»»- « C-yr.V .■ '- WH^fijii:S.iL^< • rI.’&-o'o^2 5^*2C 2 f 1 1^-i S-B S g 1?a «^. <k^ Am. ^ :w* 5j^r‘ 3? ii .i. = *r/£j j: / p» ?rr e* c -t < v< ;j r TZ X &9 5 X V < «k • 5.£» — r r *c rcr c r ^ I:. =: 3? £ — ^ M 9 c — -• c i:^ V ^ ^ r .A ^ M- r r. #• # • -^ ^ n 5 I t3 5S ^3 BT cr. cr £T 5 =, § « > C-, c c c q ftf =? ? 3- ^q: J rJ ^q •- ■« i i.. Ss s « S' § p ^ OIhST ^ ^ s ? ^ s s ^ =• S| i-L D. V 3^_ ^ ^ r- i- y» L- *.’ * —. _n * t f ^ 3o e o «#ia I* I* %^%a CD •• 7OwnerCity of Orooo, 1335 Brown Road, Crystal Bay, MN 5S232 Dale July 22, l'Ji)2 For Period March 24. 1992 to July 22. 1992 Request No. 5 Coolractor B «& D Underground, Inc., 1351 Co. Rd. 83. Maple Plain, MN 55359 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT Trunk Highway 12 Frontage Road Sewer, Water, & Street Improve-nents Project No. 91-2 Fde No. l.iOSl o , yv/.': i| 2 Change Order • Addiltoo SUMMa>JIY 1 Original Contract Amount . . 4.V % % \ 1 O * R- SSi' Change Order - Deduction Revised Contract Amount Value Completed to Date Material on Hand 7 Amount Earned S Retuinage 5% 10: ^ - 9 10 U Sub-Total Less Amount Paid Previously AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO Recommended for Approval by: I, ROSENE, ANDERUK A ASSOCIATES, INC mfk'Apptwtd by Ctmiractor A A D UNDERGROUND. INC Approved by Owner CITY OF ORONO, MN Specified Contract Completion Date: ■j". Kt Nov. 15, 91 ‘ Substantial; 'unc 30, 91 • Final Date: lilr PlirlSISlRn* ^ - .i fe: ' -t - 188,786.00 %207,7UJ0 $181334.22 s 0i» $18133422 s 9,091.71 $172.742.51 $157222J0 s 15,52021 s « ■-'7; •■’ ■ Part A - Siinitafy 5?ewgr 1 8* PVC, 10 ‘- 12' dp. in pi. 2 V PVC. 12'- 14' dp. in pL 3 S' PVC, 14'-16* dp. b pi 4 S' PVC, 16'- 18' dp. in pL 5 S' PVC, 18'- 20' dp. in pL 6 6* PVC sewer service line 7 Std. 4* dia. nanbule 8' dp w/1642B csig. in place 8 Manhole depth greater thao 8 ’ deep 9 8^ X 6' wye branch 10 Cut into existing S' VCP 11 Mechanical trench compaction - 12 Improved pipe (bundatiun per 6* depth increment in place fe^l3 Television inspection Total Part A - Sanitary Sewer :^V.i fe- V: Part B - Water Ma*.. ^^14 6T DIP, Class S2 water main 15 tr DIP, Class 52 water main 16 12* DIP, Class 52 water main 17 6* resilient wedge GV and oox IS S' resilient wedge GV and box 19 JT resilient wedge GV and box 20 y valve hydrant 21 Connect to exist, water line (wet tap) : 1^ 22 Connect to exisl. water line (cut u) 23 CJ. litUnns iS:. m «.• m 24 Merhaairal trench compaction i> - w: 25 Improved pipe foundation per 6* depth increments in place 26 Clear and grub trees Total Part B - Water Mam twuiFr #ti ..... Unit CuolTMCt Qumo UI x yiict QuaoUty T* Dttl* Amo tail To Dolo LF 40 15.00 87 1,305.00 LF 200 15.00 250 3,750.00 LF 200 15.00 200 3,00OX)0 LF 260 15.00 200 3,000.00 LF 60 25.00 20 500.00 LF 60 10.00 60 6C0.00 EA 3 995.00 3 2,985.00 LF 23 58.00 215 1,247.00 EA 2 50.00 2 100.00 EA 1 300.00 1 300.00 LF 820 U.o5 817 531.05 LF 750 1.00 ISl 757.00 LF 760 1.00 750 $18,825.05 LF 50 15.60 30 468iX) LF 875 15.60 840 13,104.00 LF 580 20J15 575 11,988.75 EA 2 340.00 3 1,020.00 EA 7 440.00 5 2,200.00 EA 2 795.00 2 1,590.00 EA EA 2 1 1,100.00 1,440.00 2 2,200i)0 EA 1 300.00 1 300iU LB 4.500 0.85 4,580 3493H0 LF 1,510 0.20 1,445 289D0 LF 300 0.80 300 240.00 EA RP-1 15 85.00 27 _____na $39,587.75 't4 L. ^ ^ ■’ 1^ !<«■ Part C - Sinrm 5i4iwgr #pK/' Ht V - mm- • i te- m:.i Ife'aM: Bii 1»? ““ isKs ftp: sis, : y-^s' i' ift" P::. feS-: V t»SlAFP 8;«:::.gu8iaassaa-::^:.. Uoit Cooimd QimalJly UoJl Prk# Qumollty Tu Ottic RP2 Tm Dttto 27 ir RCP, Class V in place LF 160 15.00 261 3,91550 28 18” RCP, Class III ia place LF 370 17.00 380 6,460.00 29 21” RCP, Class III in place LF 75 20.00 70 1,40050 30 Std. CBMH W/3067V casting EA 3 988.00 3 2,96450 31 SlU. catch basin w/3067V casting EA “>856.00 3 2,56850 32 21* RCP flared end w/trashguard EA 1 650.00 1 650.00 33 12T RCP flared end w/trashguard EA 1 480.00 1 48050 34 Ri|»-ap in place CY 3 40.00 33 l>pe 1 (iter blanket SY •> 4m 10.00 36 Siltation/erosion control fence. Mirafi *Envirofeoce”LF 250 1.80 50 90.00 37 Improved pipe foundation per 6* depth increment in place LF 300 0.80 200 16050 38 Mechanical trench compaction LF 510 0.20 641 _______128.70- Total Part C - Storm Sewer $18515^0 Part D • Sircci 39 Common excavation CY 5,500 1.25 6,228 7,785.00 40 Granular borrow CY 2,000 125 2,726 19.76350 41 Class 3 aggregate base TN 2,400 5.70 1.680.33 9,57758 42 Clau 3 100% crushed quarry limestone i^gregate base TN 1,750 950 1,7515 16,642.10 43 Type 31 base course mwture TN 550 1650 44 Type 41 wear course mixture TN 275 20.00 45 AC'l bit. material for mixture TN 47 135.00 46 Bit. material for tack coat GL 300 150 47 2341 bit. material for patching TN 20 64.00 1253 82L12 48 B618 concrete curb Sl gutter LF 1,460 5.60 1,400 734050 49 Reinforcing for curb LF 200 0.75 200 15050 30 Sod with topsoil SY 4,000 150 51 Seeding AC 1 900i)0 52 Geotcxtilc fabric SY 3,500 1.20 3,175 3,81C50 y 1 JkL^.*xl:. :i ;vV. Pi*^ r-, / ‘ J* » *'' lltai 53 4* subdrain per detail Total Part D - Street 54 Casing for 8* DIP 55 Casing for 12* DIP Total Addendum No. 1 si • m phflngg Qfdgf Nq. t 6* DIP, Class S2 water main 8” DIP, Class 52 water main 12* LIP, Class 52 water main 16* DIP, Class 52 water main 6* resilient wedge GV and box 8* resilient wedge GV and box 12* butterfly valve and box 16* butterfly valve and box y valve hydrant Connect to exist, water line (wet tap) Cl. fittings Mechanical trench compaction Improved pipe foundation per 6* depth increments in place Casing for 12* DIP Total Change Order No. 1 ChBDgCaQcdficJblfLi^ e ; V ‘10 Clau S 100% crushed quarry l:Bifitonr aggregate base Total Change Order No. 2 ' V- ... «W'fe pnjuT ip?;"’'’ ■ UfUl LF LF Too RP3 Coolrucl Qa^iililj 800 45 60 250 Untt Prtc* 5.80 Ik 00 118.00 Qiualtiy T« IKii* 800 9J0 241.76 T» Dal* A64aoa $71,029.60 5310.00 $5310.00 LF 50 15.60 43 670.80 LF (35)15.60 LF 410 20.85 410 8348 JO LF 250 28.00 250 7,000.00 EA •#»340.00 2 680.00 EA (1)440.00 EA 795.00 2 1390.00 EA A*1,660.00 2 3320.00 EA *-1 1,100.00 2 2200.00 EA (1)1,440.00 LB 2,000 0.85 2000 l,700i)0 LF 670 0.20 703 14030 LF 130 0.80 150 120i» LF (00)118.00 $25,969.90 2396J2 $2396.72 1 •% ■i 'JiEu. -V; •J[V” r .■•••:5 •;5 m'm p-; /iV ll«n Uall CaolnMrl Qimalllj Uoil Price Qautlly To Dote ToDiote ii pP Pb • W''Ki'/- •■i Total Part A • Sanitary Sewer Total Part B • Water Main Total Part C • Storm Sewer Total Part D - Street Total Adtlendum No. 1 Total Chan^ Order No. 1 Total Change Order No. 2 Total Work Completed lu Date IS^BS 39^.75 18,81520 71,029.60 5310iX> 25,969.90 ?.296>7^ S18133422 m >:• I'-* ?*r. w^4-ii!-# P-’- &v-fA..:, iiip- w$.mm" V... , .-y .‘i- S*” ■ RP-4 i i 4 i '4 ■i •t3 A *■ •!' ■• T 'U .••i! •;v . •< ■ > *■ *? a * .‘ ** 4■'.j m!' ■ *'■m ,,fe ^^^>wiect fe'- Ftaject Na P- Wb tfa.te"- ■ Mh.yQomnfiioi to^-iX.-' '■■• PAYMENT .STATUS Ciry of Orooo Trk Hwy 12 Frootage Road Sewer, Water & Stree' Improvenieati 91*2 13951 B & D Underground, Inc. f .V.-* •i m.m'CHAMGE QRPRRS rr P’-■■ ■ li|v tffii,-' . v, No. 1 Dale 10-10-91 Additional work 2 3-18-92 Additional work sp'.v' ti' Total ^^*cr Orders - Add $172,742^1 9,091.71 $181334.22 Original Contract Change Orders Revlicd Contract • w Amount $1635030 2375.00 $18,92530 No.Period Payment Rctainagp Completed 1 Start 11-1-91 $52,484.46 $2,76234 $5534680 2 11-1-91 12-1-91 60,18934 5,93021 118,60421 3 12-1-91 1-1-92 38,897.87 7,977.47 15934934 4 1-1-92 3-24-92 5,650.43 8,274.86 165,497.16 5 3-24-92 7-22-92 15,52021 9,091.71 18183422 $188,7B6iX) 18.92330 $207,71130 RP-5 1i i ■i r .■ IP^-feS|r^ ■^i. P. 0^;!^ I'r:'^ mi ‘ ^1 M.- t‘i./ ■K- 9:^ .-'• t>'4 V: # pi ■i^:-•fr": tSyf- t6#-'i" tefe,.- ii4. |S^r: tF'- ft jft. w K f':.ft > ?^r M-:"' ii'^ tfyI m.K'::!:V J' mi] g' ^i*/j TO; FROM: DATE: 80BJBCT: Ron Moorse, City Administrator John R. Gerhardson# Public Works Director July 24, 1992 Fuel Distribution System New Facility Ofi % % At the Council meeting on July 13, 1992, Council tabled action on the fuel distribution system at the new facility pending additional inforaiation being presented. The information requested during a meeting on Friday, July 24, 1992 will not be available until Monday evening. I have attached the regulations for installation of underground tanks. Above ground tank regulations may not be final until November of this year. ch W m -m’0". i J:re:: hter--”-4v '.V ? * * ■' ■ k'-r. K- Eif' rIl-r-: -*■■' TO; Ron Moorse, City Administrator PROmV* John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director DATE:July 8, 1992 m SUBJECT: Bid Award Fuel Distribution System New Facility pkm. p-:- W’ On June 8 1992. Staff recommended end Council approved tabling the bid «arl foV the fuel distribution system for the new City facility pending research of an above ground system. Kr K:--' f • %':■ . A Ik ■ b.’.-''. -'A We have been advised that an above ground system can cost an additional $17,000.00 not including the cost of filing for a var^anc to allow for 10,000 gal. capacity per tank, and costs for landscaping or screening. m b.; ..r u^: He have been advised that the type of system we are recommending meets all state and federal guidelines and that it is a system that will be used for several years. The budgeted amount for the fuel distribution system was $71,300.00. The low bid with add ons and deductions amounts to 567,867.00 and recommend proceeding and award the bid to Pump & Meter for the above amount. ■y f It should be noted that one of the deductions » '’w”will coMDUter for the fueling system in the amount of $1,200.00. we wxii ha piiMhaaing a personal computer for approximately *’’*““* but it will be a unit that will be compatible to our existing personal computers. J-'" Fi' ■ F >- k:i0x:i kk.Vjt' \ ■inm-'fK-' ’I'- A •t' r<. 4y. J ■ . ts-.: ■ ■■* lii KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CONTR ACTORS CONSTRLa:ON MANAGERS July 8.1992 - > t t Mr. Ron Moorsc Cicy of Orono 1335 Brown Road South Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Qai 9 399^ Re: Orono Public Works Equipment Package K/A Project #4059 Dear Ron: JD/lp enclosed a copy of their original quotation and ihcir supplemental quote for adding deadman hold down anchors. Please call me if you have any questions. Very truly yours, US-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Project Manager Minneapolis Oivisiofi 325 South 8th Street. Minneapolis. MN 55-t04 Phone: (612J 332-7281 FAX: (612) 332-8739 Equal Opportunity Employer :L> * kLj .l^L. i.W - iT^TSi.S.C :.ir£.*.i.Ni i ;-.-.:.---JvEhiCLS seavca^c ecu:fm£nt n»SE^XS • SAtcS • W5T>Lt>T:CNS .■‘>r OiX^ ^£,ZiTicS,, ^fZC. filaeatsior BMl. MN 55343 h, kV.- L\‘ -iS< f4'l (V ■■P"' fr ' i'-'-I- ■5 ‘i t- ■ >;' sK'lt'J'*' g,-;'I®.. ;r '•; ^A:v ;. mikekealy Phone: 612-933->8C0 FAX 612-939-0418 FORM CF PROPOSAL Section: 003C0-1 ifnpany ~Mmr7onn~DaVfos 525 South Eghth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota S5404 Re: Bid Package No. Three (3) Orono Municipal Faculties Orono. Mlnnesoti May 15.1992 1.01 BASE BIO: The undersigned, having carefully examined the site and local conditions and the Contract Documents, including Adveftisement for Bids, tnstruedons to Bidders. Contract Forms, General Conditions. Supplementary Conditions, Specifications and Drawings, and Addenda Nos. 1 .___,___, . as prepared by the Architect. Boarman Kroos Pfister & Associates. Inc., hereby propose(s) to furnish all labor. equipment and/or materials required to accomplish the Work called for by said documents for the lump sum amounts proposed herein. Base Bid indudes sales tax and cost for bond. Bid Category (Title) g«»gtion 11140-1 Vehicle Service Equiement Thirty Four Thousand Eight Hundred Bld_siatt;;4_2e2ffin____________________DoHars ($ 34,867.00 ) ** Bid Category 3 fTMe) Section 14450 Vehicle lifts_______ Thirty Thousand Bid_________Five Hundred Thirteen __Dollars (S 30.513.00 ) **♦ Bid Category 3 (Title) Section 11142-1 Fuel Distribution'System Sixty Eight Thousand Bid Nine Hundred One________________Ooliars($ 68.901.00 ) * Bid Category, Bid (Title) Dollars ($ Bid Category, Bid (Tide) Dollars (S ) DeMatering of Excavation not included. I 1 I if' *♦ Nbter piping, natural gas piping not included. Air piping included for reels and purp III& only. Electrical %riring of ccirpressor and presstire washer not included. MS:, Hfe::' water proofing rretrbrane by others. Concrete slab work at grade by others Electrical wiring of power unit by others. It1^: ii. FORM OF PROPOSAL Section: 00300*2 ^i NEO bid DEDUCT: Bid Calegory # f ^4 9* ■M; ‘v. W, . k f''' 'i- ■■ •’ it": «t>; Bid Category #_1 Bid Category #_1 Bid Category #__ c^M-rn 11140-1 Vehicle Service Equipment (Trfia) CfK-^tion 14450 Vehicle U^ts Bid Category # gecticn 11142-1 Fuel Dis.trib icfttSystem _ fTitle)____________________— (Trtle)____________________ As a combined Bid. OeDUCr:S_. 2,800 .,00 1.03 ACCEPTANCE OF BIDS: AU addenda shall become part of the bid arxl the Work, l^e In the space provided where irxJIcaled on the first page e A • e^^ shall Insert the addenda numbers in uiw ----------- In “>^“^9 S dtere^ncles In bidding rn^iT^e^i^nlS'wS nol^mw mis bkJ ««hin thirty (30) days ahcr the date of open.ng cf bids. 1.05 CONTRACT AND BONO: bond. 1.06 BIO SECURITY: A canIBad check, eashlef's check, or bidder's ba^ bo'l^on’d^** JlM^the >he payable to the order me^ecHled time, ~fnmishiw a>-V nnt. S^rrtmc have been s.ned or the time specified In the InsmjctJons to Bidders has elapsed. 112'1.04 .1 W' ■'mfefS' fe',j d.!:.mm:^:im ■ 'M. Itm form of proposalSection: 00300-3 If a corporation, what Is state of Incorporation?----Minn Qualified to do business In Minnesota? If a partnership, state full names of alt partners:__ MipSfe. ft-' Mi mm Cuirent Full, LeQal Name of Rrm: Name: P»im & Service > Address:______11303 Exce lsior Blvd.------ Hnnkins. Mn 55343. ^ •- ifit» ..> \'t : (612)933-4800 L6U4»3ar0418 ^_______TMir^ I *-------vr —^^JosecrTB. Radennacner Treasurer 5-28-92 7 END OF SECnCN m .i.d % rndim ■ P f f ■ Ap5 ■*. iii* jt '!% 1124.04 rv-- . ■;! K:>P;i' ' *t:(jFpTOalgtflR ■1-- .•••■. S' ■■ r®!fu cwu/ yffWe^■‘/t4! SERN.CE • SALES • INSTALLATION / _ ------- r-v> '■^:; \ :?v; ;f M: ? - fed" C: f ■vv ''i:- \i{ |,-- ?l>. firm i .•: *.11303 EXCELSIOR BLVD. HOPKINS. MN 55343 (612) 933-4800 FAX f6I2J 939 0413 ,/u 1 y 6» ^ ^ Pttnr yo^n Davi^tg, Kraus Anderson 523 South ath Street Mpls, Minn 554(34 /?,.. Section UJ*S-i, Distribution Systeo, Orono for the City of J oh n f Deduct ttsm.ae Plus rax if customer supplies orr. PC Computer. omit cord encoder from b,d Deduct S3.t,OD.0O Plus Tax Sincere!yp PUMP I MSTER SERVICE, INC. ~~L^— h Mike Kealy i Fuellnt .^ysfems -Electronic Guui,ing «i OCl SelfServ^ EquifJment _ Compressors r*.^. ;-- n. .»•*--■* ■ax M-«U.iU- 4 ■■il '52*? No.6258 * « » • Ptsm/m mHti j4M^ J^mc*SERVICE SALES INSTALLATION / Jlttm John Ds¥i»M TlMlIl^lALSUSMITTtO TO 11303 EXCELSIOR BLVO. ^ (612] 933-4AOO — HOPKINS. MN 5S343 (On Clv. Rd3^ Just W«u cf Cty. RJ. jb ) f AX (612) 9i9-04fi »rron Construct ion m South Eighth Str§»t rtATf 2Tf ^ plal K. Ml nn 55404__________________________ I' PMSI harvtoy pr*paMl to furniih (•bor and maftriah and/or tqulpmani ro' CM| (cb batad Upon tha following sptcificitiont: fHONC 333-7231 FfUic 332- o« aHone 6173 OATS 6-3-93 409 NAA4S Pood M^n Onchot^ing .<oo kOCArioN Qr-ono M*int»n^nom Facility I OPTIONf ronh Snchar^ina itOi Hold Down Pnchor Strops. Fort ond pour Pood Mon coneroto onchort and anchor (2) 29,0(id gallon tonkM in aueavotion. i'-'-i;'- m«na 7671 _. -1 71^0 fhounand Nine Hundred Sixty Six i 09/100 1 ^—I gj oStSS*la oawaaiiti la to aa aaaaMaO. AM ia to ia a ZZ'52SS_^ vMMraM ay M V am .daio lit. Qowiiar Qti Qoifiir OmNAmtutrn THW. 'T> ■^ r~w r- ii'A'-*?'.; Faelint Syttem* - Eleetroaie Cautin* 3 Imienuxy Contnie — Fibergiase Tania 4 Pipe memoftm Self Sera Eauiomtmi — C»mft€tsof$ Auto Lifig 4 Parts - Servi 'e Siatio* Pumas M jm- 'A . m' ^ m- §■' m.I?! • ' JU •. ',;\. ;>•I *.:i,. W. III;- l4‘--- life: 05/13/91 taiVISOR 1 Cxa/30 AR18J4 UNDiHCaCUND STCRACE TANK SYSTi.'IS OESIGM, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, AND NOTIFICATION 3 7150.0100 PERFORWANCT STANDARDS FOR NrN UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK # 4 STSTE.MS. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Subpart 1. Purpose. To prevent releases due to structural . '• • • failure, corrosion, or spills and overfills for as lonq as the underground storage tank systea is used to store regulated rubstanccs, all owners and operators of new underground storage as > tank aysteas must matt the rtquircmtnta in subparts 2 to 8. Subp. 2. Tanks. Each tank must be properly designed and ccnstructed, and any part underground that routinely contains product must be protected from corrosion using one of the methods specified in items A to E. The corrosion protection methods in items A to D must be in accordance with one of the 15 16 17 'i. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 codes at practice in subpart 3 developed by a nationally recognized association or independent testing laboratory; A. The canK is constructed of Ciberglass*reinforced plastic. B. The tank is constructed of steel and cathodically protected in the following manner: (1) the tank is coated with a suitable dielectric material; (2) field-installed cathodic protection systems are designed by a corrosion expert; (3) impressed current systems are designed to allow determination of current operating status as required in pare 7150.0210, subpart 4; and (4) cathodic protection systems are operated and maintained according to part 7150.0210. E. The tank Is constructed of a steel- and fiberglass-reinforced plastic composite. 0. The tank is constructed of metal without additional corrosion protection measures provided that: (1) the tank is installed at a site that is determined by a corrosion expert not to be corrosive enough to Approv«tf by o# ■ ti; ' "i. f' ’ ■ r ;• 't ■ 1-m- H’ % trri^ i.. OS/13/91 lar/isoa j cmr/bo Aai334 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 U / 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 21 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 cause it to have a release due to corrosion during its operating life; and / (2) owners and operators maintain records that demonstrate compliance with tho requirements of subitem (ij for the remaining life of the tank. E. The tank construction and corrosion protection are determined by the commissioner to be designed to prevent the release or threatened release of a stored regulated substance in a manner that is no less protective of human health and the environment than items A to O. The commissioner's determination under this item must be obtained in writing and owners and operators must keep the determination for the life of the tank. Subp. 3. Codes of practice for tanks. Codes of practice for subpart 2 are described in items A to C. A. The following codes of practice apply to subpart 2. item A: (1) Underwriters Laboratories UL 1316, Class-Piber-Reinforced Plastic Underground Storage TanKs for Petroleum Products; (2J Underwriters Laboratories of Canada CAN4>S61S*-M83, Standard for Reinforced Plastic Underground Tanks for Petroleum Products; or (3) American Society of Testing and Materials 04021-86, Standard Specification for Clasa-Piber-Reinforccd Polyester Underground Petroleum Storage Tanks. 8. The following codes of practice apply to subpart 2, item •: (1) Steel Tank Institute Specifications for STI-P3 System of External Corrosion Protection of Underground Steel Storage Tanks; (2) Underwriters Laboratories OL 1746, Corrosion Protection Systems for Underground Storage Tanks; (3) Underwriters Laboratories of Canada CAN4—S603.1-M8S, Standard for Galvanic Corrosion Protection Systems for Steel Underground Tanks for Flammable and Combustible Liquids; Approved dy Atvffpr i: ■'■ ?t> V' $K. *r- ;v;^- •*t'. %h:m WP"' *" I . ■. - -■if:- 'i'''i -^: ;fe R. ■;v : i' '-» . W'r ::>■ iS- . ••^k‘ :4‘> 'V^. #'•i*'m^,3^- U: ^■ Sfe:fa Kr it- 'ifH’Vr.’- :^"f.-v te I•i.. ■.R- I'*rI S-'::^‘ 1^'"' fe'^'i- iil^ 05/13 ;i (ar/rsoa j cMa/ao a?1334 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 (4) Underwriters Laboratories of Canada CAJJ4-S6O3-M05, Standard Cor Steel Underground Tanics for Flaraaable and Combustible Liquids; ' t i Underwriters Laboratories of Canada CAN4-S631-H84, Standard for Isolating Bushings for Steel Underground Tanks Protected with Coatings and Galvanic Systems; (6) National Association of Corrosion Engineers RP>02-8S, Control of External Corrosion on Metallic Buried. Partially Buried, or Submerged Liquid Storage Systems; or (7) Underwriters Laboratories UL 58, Steel Underground Tanks for riammable and Combustible Liquids. C. The following codes of practice apply to subpart 2. item C: 14 15 16 17 ^10 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 tl) Underwriters Laboratories UL 1746, Corrosion Protection Systems Cor Underground Storage Tanks; (2) Association of Composite Tanks ACT-100. Specification for the Fabrication of FRP Clad Underground Storage Tanks: or (3) Steel Tank Institute STI F894-89, Specification Cor External Corrosion Protection of FRP Composite Steel Underground Storage Tanks. Subp. 4. Piping. The piping that routincl/ contains regulated substances and is in contact with the ground must be properly designed, constructed, and protected from corrosion using one of the methods spe<. ified in items A to 0. The corrosion protection methods in items A to C must be in # accordance with one of the codes of practice in subpart 5 developed by a nationally recognized association or independent testing laboratory: A. The piping is constructed of fiberglass-reinforced plastic. B. The piping is constructed of steel and cathodically protected in the following aanaort (1) the piping is coated with a suitable dielectric material; (2) field'-installed cat.hodic protection systems Approved Oy PtTtfor d mK- w -'c:... k>•••*•.• #?Vf;r ■ j;-,? f 05/13/91 tar.'isca i cmh/3o Aaia34 1 2 3 « 5 6 7 • 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ^7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 an designed by a corrosion expert; (3) impressed current systems ere designed to 0 allow determination of current operating status as required in part 71S0.0210. subpart 4; and (4) cathodic protection systems arc operated and maintained according to part 7150.0210. C. Tha piping is constructed of metal without additional corrosion protection measures* provided that: (1) the piping is installed at a site that is determlned’by a corrosion expert to not be corrosive enough to causa it to have a release due to corrosion during its operating life; and (2) owners and operators maintain records that demonstrate compliance with subitem (1) for the remaini''.g life of the piping. D. The piping construction and corrosion protection are determined by the commissioner to be designed to prevent the release or threatened release of a stored regulated substance in a manner that is no less protective of human health and the environment than the requirements of items A to C. The commissioner's determination under this item must be obtained in writing and the tank owners and operators must keep the determination for the life of the tank. Subp. 5. Codes of practice for piping. Codes of practice for subpart 4 are described in items A to C. A. The following codes of practice apply to subpart 4* item A; (1) Onderwriters Laboratories OL 567* Pipe Connectors for riaamable and Combustible Liquids and LPHSas; (2) Onderwriters Laboratories of Canada CAM4*S633*‘H84* Plexible Onderground Hose Connectors for flammable and Combustible Liquids; or (3) Onderwriters Laboratories of Canada OLC Subject C107C*M1984* Guide for Class Fibre Reinforced Plastic Pipe and fittings for Flammable Liquids. B. The following codes of practice apply to subpart Aper«««e »/£/>•>• fc.. I-P 05/13/91 (arvisca j CMa/3D Aaia34 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 4, itera 9; is 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 k; ^'' (1) Nacional fire Proccction Association 30, Flaaaable and Ccobustible Liquids Code; 0 (2) Aaerican Petroleua Institute 1615, Installation of Onderqround Petroleua Storaqe Systens; (3) Aaerican Petroleua Institute 1632, Cathodic Protection of Underground Petroleua Storage Tanks and Piping Systeas; or (4) National Association of Corrosion Engineers RP-01-69r Control of External Corrosion on Underground or Subaerged Metallic Piping Systems. C. The following codes of practice apply to subpart 4, item C: (1) National Tire Protection Association 30, riaesBable and Coabustible Liquids Code; or (2) National Association of Corrosion Engineers pp.01-69, Control of External Corrosion on Underground or Submerged Metallic Piping Systems. Subp. 6. Spill and overfill prevention equipment. A. Except as provided in item B, to prevent spilling and overfilling associated with product transfer to the underground storage tank systera, owners and operators oust use the following spill and overfill prevention equipment: (1) spill prevention equipment that will prevent release of product to the environaent when the transfer hose is detached from the fill pipe, for example, a spill catchment basin: and (2) overfill prevention equipaent that will: (a) automatically shut off flow into the tank when the tank is no aore than 95 percent full: or (b) alert the transfer operator when the tank is no aore than 90 percent full by restricting the flow into the rank oc triggering a high-level alars. B. Owners and operators are not required to use the spill and overfill nrevencion equi^ent specified in itea A if: (1) alternative equipaent is used that is Approved tty Advisor ¥: ‘"-f ' iV 1^- IS&;v- Si'-T.St ? % f-s %^L m-i ‘i-ar; •r?i . ,ii- ■f*'' .'r.V-r. '» ' »r- -3 1 - - |t“- m!'’ '.f iF t i_ ■ ■ kLdl- 05/13/91 tR£T/IS0a I C.y»/90 Aai834 1 dccerained by the commissioner to be no less protective of human 2 i.eelth end the environment then the equipment specified In item 3 A; or ; 4 5 S 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 r 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 (2) the underground storage tank system is filled by transfers of no more than 2S gallons at one time. The commissioner's determination under subitem (1) must be obtained in writing and the tank owners and operators must keep the determination for the life of the tank. Subp. 7. Installation. All tanks and piping must be properly iQstalled according to the manufacturer's instructions and one of the following codes of practice developed by a nationally recognized association or independent testing laboratory: A. American Petroleum Institute 1615, Instailation of Underground Petroleum Storage Systems; B. Petroleum Equipment Institute RP 100, Recoomended Practices for Installation of Underground Liquid Storage Systems; C. American National Standards Institute B31.3, Chemical Plant and Petroleum Refinery Piping; or 0. American National Standards Institute B31.4, Liquid Transportation Systems for Hydrocarbons, Liquid Petroleum Gas, Anhydrous Ammonia and Alcohols. Subp. 8. Certification of installation. <h4ners and operators must demonstrate compliance with subpart 7 by certifying on the underground storage tank notification form required in part 7150.0120 that: • « A. the installer is in compliance with certification requirements Imposed by the agency under chapter 7105; and 8. all work listed in the manufacturer*s installation checklists has been completed. 32 33 34 35 7150.0110 UPGRAOZIIG OP EXISTING ONOERCROUND STORAGE TAMt SYSTEMS Subpart 1. Alternatives allowed. Not later than December 22. 1998, all existing underground storage tank systems muse comply with one of the following requirements: I I % If-' <L'\ ' '•‘tv fc'- !if [fi • <" i fiv- •v^ f. I' F' ,^.- 9 . f ‘ S ,,,,fe 05/13/91 (R£VISOa J CMR/BO ARia34 1 2 3 4 5 < 7 • 9 10 11 12 1? 14 15 16 17 A. n«w underground storage tanH systea perforaance standards under part 7150.0100; B. the upgrading rcquireacnts in subparts 2 to 4; or C. ^ closure requircaeats under parts 7150.0400 to 7150.0440# Including applicable requiresents for corrective action under Minnesota Statutes# section 115.061. Subp. 2. Tank upgrading requircaents. Steel tanks oust be protected froa corrosion using the corrosion protection aethods In iteas A to C. A. A tank nay be upgraded by internal lining if: (1) the lining is installed according to the ccquireaents of part 7150.0230; and (2) within ten years after lining# and every five years after that# the lined tank is internally inspected and found to be structurally sound with the lining still perforaing according to original design specifications. B. A tank suy be upgraded by cathodic protection if the cathodic protection systea aeets the tequireoents of pare '19 7150.0100# subpact 2# item B# subitems (2) to (4)# and the 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2f 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 integrity of the tank is ensured using one of the aethods.in subitems (1) to (4). (1) The tank is internally inspected and assessed to ensure that the tank is structurally sound and free of corrosion ‘'oles prior to installing the cathodic protection systea. (2) The tank has been installed for leas than ten years and is aonitored monthly for releases according to part 7150.0330* Items B to X. _ 13) The tank has been installed for less than ten ysars and is assessed for corrosion holes by conducting two tightness tests that aeet the requireaents of part 7150.0330# item D. The first tightness test must be conducted before installing the cathodic protection systea. Tho second tightness test must be conducted between three and sis months following the first operatio'* sf the c"c**r*dle proteetioa systea. (4) The tank Is assessed for corrosion holes by a AoprovM Ay A^vtsor mm- m0^ Wir 0'^ $i «C': : j i ‘ *.- i?T'feIfel r U»y .. r . ISft 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 05/13/91 (RT/ISOA ] OU«/3D AJtlS34 acchod thAt is deceraincd by the eoBnissioner to prevent releases in a aanner that Is no less protective of human health and the erwironaent than subitems (1) to (3). . C. A tank aay be upgraded by both internal llnin9 and cathodic protection if: (1) the lining is installed according to part 71S0.0230; and 12) the cathodic p^’orection system acees the requlreaents of part 7150.0100, subpart 7, iter a. Subitems (2) to (4). * D. The corrosion protection aethods in items A to C oust be in accordance with one or more of the following codes of practice developed by a nationally recognised association or independent testing laboratory: (1) American Petroleua Institute 1631, Interior Lining of Onderground Storage Tanks; (2) National Leak Prevention Association 631, Spill Prevention, Miniaua lO'fear Life Cacension of Existing Steel Onderground Tanka by Lining Without the Addition of Cathodic Protection; (3) National Association of Corrosion Engineers 8P*02*‘8S, Control of External Corrosion on Metallic Buried, Partially Buried, or Subeerged Liquid Storage Systems: or (4) American Petroleum Institute 1632, Cathodic Protection of Underground Petroleum Storage Tanka and Pipi g Systems. Subp. 3. Piping upgrading requirememts. Metal piping that routinely contains regulated substances and is in contact with the ground must meet the requirements of pm^c 7150.0100, subpart 4, item B, subitems (2) to |4). Subp. 4. Spill end overfill prevention equipment. To prevent spilling and overfilling associated with product transfer to ths underground storage tank nystem, all existing underground storaga tank systems muse comply with new underground storage tank system spill and overfill prevention equipment requirements in part 7150.0100, subpare 6. ^wttor , r 1. ■^*;l |y^ R.; fit.* T •'V*. fc'-'' tK. St^’ h'’V-n; ^ 'li r' • > W- pli^- '-V t'Si K.r- e5?v ^V'V ■f %■ '0 'fi-* ■» *4 ' w> i.? ,:, .V^ 1-^P 1 2 3 4 5 $ 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 U8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2i 27 28 29 30 11 32 33 34 35 05/13/S I (REVISOa I CMa/30 ASlSJi 7’50.0120 NOTIFICATION RE0UIa£.y£^4TS. Subpart 1. Notic* pf anderground storage tank systea - installation.'-At least 30 days'before* beg! ' ng'installation o! * . ^ m-- an undergrouodjStocago'tanli systea ^ndcr.pact-71S0.0100«-'Owners and operators wist‘BOttCy-lhe coaalstloner of-their intent'to -- install the underground storage*tank'systc: Subp. 2. Notification of new tanks and changes in service. An owner who brings an underground storage tank systca into use or oakes a change in service to an existing tank system after June 1, 1986. must, within 30 days of bringing such tank Into use or making a change in service, submit to the agency. In the form prescribed by the conunlc^loner. a notice of the existence of such tank system or type of c.hange in service, including the Information required by Minnesota Statutes, svction 116.48. subdivisions 1 and 3. Subp. 3. Owner and operator tank system certification. Owners and operators of new underground storage tank syscens must certify in t.ne notification form compliance with the following requirements: A. installation of tanks and piping under part 7150.0100. subpart 8; B. cathodic protection of steel tanks and piping under part 7150.0100, subparts 2 and 4; C. financial responsibility under Code of Federal Regulations,, title 40, part 280, subpart H; and 0. release detection under parts 7150.0310 and 7150.0320. Subp. 4. Installer tank system certification, am-irs and operators of new underground storage tank systems must ensure that the installer certifies in the notification form that the methods used to install the tanks and piping comply with part 7150.OICO. subpart 7. and that the installer is in compliance with certification reguirements imposed by chapter 7105. Subp. 5. Repairer tank system certification. Owners and operators of underground storage tank systems must ensure that ^ ftimsof riiiM 1 05/13/91 (ar'i/ISCn ] C>*a/3D AJtl334 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 the repairer certifiea in the notification fora that the aecheds ustd to repair the tanks and pipin9 comply with parts 7150.0110 and 7150.0230 and that the repairer is in compliance with certification requirements imposed by chapter 7105. Subp. 6. Tank seller notification. a person who sells a tank intended to be used as an underground storage tank or property that tr' seller knows contains an underground storage tank oust notify the purchaser of the tank in wilting of the owner’s notification obligations under subparc i 2 and under Minnesota Statutes, section 116.48. GENERAL OPERATING REQUIHE.MENTii 12 13 14 « 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2<* 30 31 7150.0200 SPILL AND OVERFILL CONTROL. Subpart 1. Spill and overfill release prevention. Owners and operators must ensure that releases due to spilling or overfilling do not occur. The owner or operator must ensure that the volume available in the tank is greater than the volume of product to be transferred to the tank before the transfer is made and that the transfer operation is monitored constantly to P^*vent overfilling and spilling. One of the following codes of practice developed by s nationally recognized association or independent testing laboratorv must be <sed to comply with this subpart: A. National Fire Protection Association 30, Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code; B. National Fire Protection Association 385, Stardard for Tank Vehicles for Flammable and Combustible Liquids; or C. American Petroleum institute 1621, Bulk Liquid Stock Control at Retail Outlets. Subp. 2. Reporting and cleanup. The owner and operator must reoort, investigate, and cleanup any spilla and overfills according to Minnesota Statutes, section 115.061. 32 7150.0210 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF CORROSION PROTECTION. 33 Subpart 1. Owner and operator compliance. Owners and 34 operators of underground storage tank systema with corrosion 35 protection muse comply with the requirements In subparts 2 to 5 Approvvtf '.■>U‘.•♦ .'-V^TT^ ii ‘ m.. ri '^.' m- (If--;fe' W:'- ' if. . ^ V '■ •• V- ■\m . : 4- i ■ '-I •'•■ ■ -t /'••’■' ■'• *• M . i.T.' 'ill- r ■ %v. m^ 1 2 3 4 i 6 7 • 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 29 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 39 36 05/13/91 (A£V:SCR I CM7/33 A3I334 to ensure tftet releases due to corrosion are prevented for as long as the underground storage tank systea is used to store regulated substances* or is temporarily closed in accordance with part 71S0.0400. Subp. 2. Corrosion protection systea aaintenance. All corrosion protection systems aust be operated and maintained to continuously provide corrosion protection to the metal coaponents of the part of the tank and piping that routinely contains regulated substances and is in contact with the ground. Subp. 3. Cathodic protection systea aaintenance. All underground storage tank systems equipped with cathodic protection systems must be inspected for proper operation by a qualified cathodic protection tester according to the following requireaents: A. all cathodic protection systeas must be tested within six months of installation and at least every three years after that: and 8. the criteria that are used to determine that cathodic protection is adequate as required by this subpart must be according to the code of practice in Mational Association of Corrosion Engineers RP-02-85, Control of Exte-nal Corrosion on Metallic Buried* Partially Buried* or Subaerged Liquid Storage SystesM. Subp. 4. Xapresmed current systea maintenance. Underground storage tank systems with impressed current cathodic protection systesw aust also be inspected every 60 days to ensure the equipaent is running properly. Subp. 5. Becordkeeping. for underground storage tank systeas using cathodic protection* records of the operation of the cathodic protection aust b» aaintained according to part 7150.0240 to demonstrate conpliaice with the performance standards in this pact. These records aust provider A. the results of the last three Inspections requited in subpart 4r and B. the results of testing frem the last two inspections required in subpart 3. mm '■3''■i■' ' i'(1• 1 ■1 i I ■f ’’ ' •i Sfe '■Ify'"'-ife':S'r‘ laS-.:,'. h/K r • ■•*: . *^ P'-' H ^•:.. m^r 0^:%. - -^V # M .^-1. f plr' Wmm i» K|;i fc. XI. lit ilil? •»77sv.•5 0S/IV91 (rtsvrs'oa i c«a/3o mhu 1 2 3 4 5 • 7 • 9 10 11 13 7190.0230 COMPATXatLXTY. # Owners and operators Bust use an underpround storage tank sysetB Bade of or lined with Batcrials that are coapacible with the substance stored in the und'^rground storage tank systea. Owners and operators storing alcohol blends nay use the following guidance to eoaply with the requireaents of this part: A. Aaerlcan Petroleua Institute 1026. Storing and ■andling Ethanol and Caseline-Ethanol Blends at Distribution Terainals and Service Stations: or e B. Aaerlcan Petroleua Institute 1627, Storing and Handling of Gasoline-Nothanol/Cosolvcnt Blends at Distribution Terainals and Service Stations. . 13I 14 10 17 If 19 30 21 32 23 24 29 20 27 If 29 30 31 32 33 34 39 7190.0230 BCPAXRS ALLOWED. Owners and operators of underground storage tank systcas Bust ensure that repairs will prevent releases due to structural failure or corrosion as long as the underground storage tank systta is used to store regulated substances. The owner and op*4ator of the tank shall ensure that the person perfoming the repairs has been certified under chapter 710S. The repairs aust aeet the requireaents in iteas' A to P: Hopairs to underground storage tank systeas oust be pro|.«rly inducted according to one of the foilowing codes of practice developed by a nationally recognised association or independent testing laboratoryt (1} Rational Fire Protection Association 30. riaaaable '<<* Coesbustible liquids ^e: |2| Aaorican Petroleua Xastitute 2200, Repairing Crude Oil, liquefied Petroleua Gas and Product Pipelines; (3) Aaericao Petroleua Xastitute 1031* Interior lining of Onderground Storage Tanks: or fO) Mstioaal Leak Prevention Association 031* Spill Prevention* Niniaua 10-Year Life Bstension of Csistlng Steel Onderground Tanks by Lining Mithout the Addition of Cathodic Protection. S. Repairs to fiberglass-reinforced plastic tanka V'i’ •-•Ji 'A 4. •f .VV, •"•^ -^..... bi-‘" ■ V ;■■ '■. :. r '^ry- ' ' |i4I& »i- -i^:- w ■ ■ • • •■!■ fetr' mS'. w-t}jt^ '. -I •’ ,•pr: •PiSr. ■ '^; - ' !<S |(;£i:cv . / i ■• b!»^.:. kmyy P?:x- Mh. y»<‘ '#•» ‘S-; ■' pt:V' '• l^if it-.. ,■■ ■^mMr t-' ■ ■^•- - .Xt- «i.Vi0'-,*w> mm -m, '^..•♦^r* ""V 0 fi%■"? 1 2 3 4 9 C 7 • 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 I 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 29 26 27 20 29 30 31 32 33 34 39 09/13/91 (P.EVISOR 1 CMR/BO AR1834 nust be sijde according to the codes oC practice requited in item A. C. Metal pipe sections and fittings that have 0 released product as a result of corrosion or other daaage aust be replaced. Fiberglass pipes and fittings oust be repaired in accordance with the oanufacturer*s specifications. 0. Repaired tanks and piping Bust be tightness tested according to parts 7190.0330. Itea D; and 7150.0340, item •. within 30 days after the date of the completion of the repair escept as provided in subitems |1) to (3); (1) the repaired tank is internally inspected according to the codes of practice required in item A: (2) the repaired part of the underground storage tank system is monitored monthly for releases according to a method specified in part 7190.0330, itens C to t: or (3) another teat method is used that is determined by the commissioner to be no less protective of human health and the environment than the tests in subitems (1) and (2). C. Within six months after the repair of a cathodically protected underground storage tank system, the cathodic protection system aust be tested according to part 7190.0210. subparts 3 and 4. to ensure that It is operating properly. r. Owners and operators must maintain records of each repair, and of a eemmissiot^er's determination under 4^*" subitem (3). for the remaining operatirg life of the underground storage tank system that demonstrate compliance with the reguiremants of this part. 7190.0240 RCKNITIMG AND RSCOROICSSFtNG. Owners and operators of underground storage tank systems must cooperate fully with inspections, monitoring, and testing conducted by the agency, as well as requests for document submission, testing, and monitoring by the owner or operator under United States Code, title 42, section €991d. apsws Sy na««*«r . t i I J! 4 i.s I *%’^v.•'T -rj. > '^v-fes* ‘ 'i. ‘ - •• ^ . o1 ' ■ • ii' mL^r< iii Mr^r m r*>-.«) r.5 y .V -t ;. f S;. :'- ' , V .r;-' ite»" ■*=«% esStl -if OS/13/91 iHivrSOR I CM«/aO ARi83«1 2 J 4 9 ( 7 • 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 If >17 IS 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2C 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 34 A. Owners end opsracors eusc subnic the Collowlnq inforaseioit to tho coaoltsioner: # ., . (X) ooeificacion o8 «il uodoraround oceraqe tank syseau undor port 71SO.0L20, Includlnq cartlCleation of Installation for now undorqreund aeoraqa tank systans undar part 7150.0100* subpart 8; (2) notification of tho diseovory of an abandonod tank or of a ehanqo in tho osos* concants* or ownarship of a tank undor Ninnosoea Statutos, section 118.48, subdivisions 2 and 3] (3) roperts of all ralaasas undor Minnesota ftatutas. section 11S.06I, iacludinq suspected rolaases, spills and overfills, and confirsMd roloasos; (4) Infornation generated in tho course of taking corrective action as defined in Minnesota Statutes, section liSC.82, subdivision 4; and (5) a notification before peraanent closure or change in service under part 7150.04io. I. Owners and operators oust eaintain the following inforeation: fl) a corrosion espert*s analysis of site dorrosioa potential if corrosion protection equipoent is not used under part 7150.0100, subparts 2, itea o, and 4, itaa c» C2) the eosHisaioner's deteraination that alternative corrosion protection or spill and overfill equipaent naans aay be used under part 7150.0100, subparc 3, itea E; 4, itea Or or 8, itea li 13) docuaentation of operation of corrosion protection aquipaent under part 7150.0210, subpart 5; C4) docuaentation of underground storage tank systea repairs under part 7150.0230, itea Pr 19) docuaentation of eeaplianee with release detection requirownts under part 7150.0350; and f8) results of the site investigation conducted at peraanent closure under part 7190.0440. C. Owners and operators ausc keep the records ^■iLa.h j.l.JrA if Jtti 4.3) r’T” “Ti'-** ' — . F«- — 1 •r-j"t;- ■> .;=7v.' »• -.•••,/ •4’rL:.- . ■•".t '••'■• : • . V'7 tA- i‘-;t' .•t.: ^‘<4 |77 V,' y'V\' tl%. f,.- :>• :'71( «•■ ; \*¥: "'« * <l .. I . ■ V' .J»V »a pM- .. i:-'' ?A.s-i^-'i- fvj^'y’-'--te?'..- 13 3 4 5 t 7 t 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 19 20 21 33 33 34 25 26 27 20 29 10 n 32 33 34 35 OS/13/91 ror/XSOX I CMR/30 AR1834required either:Cl) et the underground storeqe tank site where they ere leMedietely eveileble for Inspection by the eoeniesloner: or |2) et e readily available alternative cite where they can be provided for inspection to the connissloner upon ccqueat. In the ease of pcrnanent closure records required under part 71S0.0440» owners and operators are also provided with the 9 additional alternative of naiiing closure records to the coMissioner if they cannot be kept at the site or an aiternative site as required in this item. RELSASE OETECriON 71SO»0300 GENERAL REOOIREMEHTS FOR ALL ONOERCROONO STORAGE TANK SYSTEMS. Subpart 1* Methods. Owners and operators of new and eaisting underground storage tank systems must provide a nvthod, or combination of methods, of release detection that: e A. can detect a release from any part of the tank and the connected underground piping that routinely contains product: a. is installed, calibrated, operated, and naintained according to the manufacturer's instructions, inciuding routine maintenance and service checks for operability or running condition; and C. meets-the-peef oemanee • reqs*eeme«es-*n-peet »i5fTtia»-ee-fifSvti4er“w*th-sny-peefofmanee-«le*ms-e^-*heie mennee-ei-deeeem6nst*ea-dese«ibed-*n-ve*ttng-by-ehe-eqe*pment oenufsc*uree-e»-iestalieeT—fn-odditienr-e**-meehods-meat-be *ap«a§«-*|-dete€e*nf-ehe-*eo«t-este-er-qusneity-sfeeii*ed-fer *het-methed-*«-pmr*-f*§*Tt99*T-*t«»*'*-**'*’^«''’*SeTe*4fr-*eems peebebtft9ty"et>fslae>alaea>of>9Te9T meets thm performance Standards in mart 7IS0.0330 or 7150.0349. The performance of defceetion eouiomeot must be documented with written 'J i i M 4 i ''M * \ ^ } ' i i5«.^” ■•^V'-' '::xv, :^rA.'-j.''^-’*-!> pm ’ '■ to'"-fe.- V ^ V .Vt ,,.Mr st\»i^:.v-v. mi ’S'^''W> y«'-N;-V -rfefc ^3^'®: .r |5®#r ■ r- •a -; ■ fTii-' Pv'^ .J Irl ■ If r ^WSr ‘'■■ iill^fr P#^-' fTOv IRIi r'-> . 05/13/91 lar/:sca ) cxit/sc Aiiia34 1 2 3 4 5 c 7 •P«clfiC4tion« »upoli»d bv the •cuitwne njnufacsurer or intf ll«r» In addition, nethods ui^d jfttr ch« date tt>own in tollowirtg tabl>, PKCtpe for methods 0€r3an«n£lv ln«eall*d prior to that daf ^ mnut b« capabit of d«fctlng th« iMk rmt» or ouontlty opocigiod for thot oothod In tho port of tho rul»« Ilotfd in tho toblo with « probability of dotoction of 0.99 and 0 probobilUy of foloo oUr« ot a.ait • 9 10 11 12 13 14 15u 17 Mothod Pore Doto WolMiol eonli oQuolno T»no ttontnooo eoacin^ AjieOMete took OOuoina Mieo —tic iuTo lo oii — dotootton fatno etohcnooo tooting 7150.0330. itCBs a a C Ooeoabor 22,19907150.0330, itea 0 Ooeoabor ll.■n?ff7150.O3J0, itoa f ooeoabor 32.TTO7150.0346, itea A ioDtoaoor 33,iiil 7150.0340. itea B Ooceabor 22.1990 10 19 20 21 « ^2 23 24 25 2f 27 20 20 30 Subp. 2. Poloooo noeificotion. Nhon o rolcoso dococcion Mthod oporotod oecordinq to tho porCoraonco seondords In pores 71S0»0330 ond 7150.0340 indicotos o rolcoso aoy hovo occurred, ownort ond oporotors oust notify tho oqoncy oecordinq to Ninnodbto Stotutoor soetion 115.061. Subp. 3. Roloooo dotoction schedule. Owners ond operators of oil undorqround storoqo tonk sysceas must conply with the rolooso dotoction roquiromones of porta 7150.0300 to 7150.0350 by Doeodbor 22 of tho yoor listed in the followinq toble. Kotordous OMtoriol tonks which oro not requloeod by Code of Podorol Roqulotiono, title 40, port 3S0, aust coaply with those roquiroaonto by tho doto indieotod or by (insert doto 180 doys of tor doto of odoption), whichever is later: Schedule for Phoso'*in of Rolooso Ortoecion 31 32 33 34 39 38 37 31 39 40 41 42 43. 44 45 Voor Syotoa Moo >1)Xnstollod Yoor Nhon Rolooso Ootoctien is Required (by Ooeoabor 22 of the yoor indieotod) Roforo 1985 or doto unknown 1985-1989 1970-1974 1975-19‘>9 1980-1988 1909 RO 1990 P 1991 1992 1993 P/RO P P P Now tanks Xaaodiotoly upon inseolloeion (oftor Ooeoabor 22* 1908) P^aust boqin rolooso dotoction for all pressurised pipinq 48 oecordinq to pact 7150.0310. ROeaust boqin rolsoso detection for tanks aiMl suction .m ' '>41•4• H i 1:• i .3f i i % •v: A ■•1 i^';MiP"-r;; . ‘1,7*1: ■ f''^-*^f; v^fe»>'j- Mi-"^ (h*»J(.-# ' J< - f‘i- lit*’ i«I" |f V •^ , ' ‘ • ’•’r« ...;f3 Mfe*.-: . If‘ At ^ ^ lip:. !»«■-•Ka»:' ■., V-9FF V' ?S7¥ - ^ f - '?■ V^F: '■^F 'i' ' ^¥4i7* 1 2 3 4 s c 1 f 10 11 12 13 14 15 1$ 17 II 19 20 21 23 23 24 29 21 27 21 29 30 31 32 33 34 39 ■f 05/13/91 (ir/tSOI 1 C.MR/90 MI1S34piping according to parte 7150.0310. Ittas A and 8. subitca (2): and 71S0.0320. Subp. 4. Closur*. Owners and operators ot existing underground storage tanb systees that cannot apply a eethod of release detection that cocplies with the requirements of parts 7190.0300 to 7150.0350 must complete the closure procedures in psrts 7150.0400 to 7150.0440 by the date on which release detection Is required for the underground storage tank syatee under subpart 3. 7150.0310 KCQOXRCHENTS FOR PCTROtEOH OHOCRCROOMO STCAACS TANK SYSTCHS. Owners and operators oC petroleum underground storage tank systems must provide release detection Cor tanks and piping as required in items A and I. A. Tanks aiist be monitored at least every 30 days Cor fflaases using one of the methods in part 7150.0330. items E to X* except that: (1) underground storage tank systems that meet € th9 p#rCoffliAiiC# •tjnd^rd* In pAtt 7150.0100 or 7150.0110, And th# monthly lnv«nCory eontrcl requlrtotnts In part 7150*0330# itOM A or It ••y tAnk tl9htntss ttstinQ# conducted According to part 71S0e0330# Itea 0, at least every five yeara until December 22# 1990# or until ten years after the tank is ^nftalled or upgraded uud^r part 7150.0110# itee 1# whichever is later: (2) underground storage tank eyeteea that do not meet the performance standards in part 7150.0100 or 7150.0110 may uas monthly Inventory controls conducted according to port 7150.0330, Item A or t, end aamtal tenk tightness testing oomduetsd according to part 7190.0330, itea O, until Oecembsr 32, 1991, whom tho tank aunt be upgraded under part 7190.0110 or permanently closed under part 7150.0410: end 13} tanks with capacities of S90 1.000 gallons or aay uso weekly nanuai tank gauging conducted according to ^rt 7190.0330, item R. ee the sole method of release detsetion. Sy e#.«Mr r> .t-;;S£^L2 ;-n' W-Vr.|rr . * M „ ~ • . . a ^■3 ../• -i* S *> * 1 4 I •f 3'i • 1 ' ■W-'-' ■' Jet MrJ'- pi'r-: •. te- f.;■ ■ P!P-- : V 1M--./ H'P#. V:,$ ^ v< ■‘-S W0>;''' Ilf -n^ ■/ ■ ii;. ••■■»'.&.'. f*4-"': % . i #• »Ki .i'.^♦•®'y ■ w kp.,- *•'» t R' * .rrtS OS/13/91 (RCVtSOR I CMR/90 AR1834 1 2 3 4 5 < 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 li /’ IS 19 20 21 22 23 24 29 2i 27 21 a. Ondcrqround piping th*t routinely conceios rtgulettd oubscanees aust b« aenitored for releases In a Banner that aaots ^ne of tho requireaents In subltea (i) or (2J. Cl) Ondorotound plplnq that conveys requlated sabstancos under proaaure austi (a) bo equipped with an autoaatic line leak conducted accerdlnq to part 71S0.0340, Itea A: and • (b) have an annual lioe ti9hcness test conducted according to part 7150.0340, itea a, or have aonthly Bonitorinq.conducted according to part 7150.0340. itea C. (2) Onderground piping that conveys regulated substances under suction aust cither have a line tightness test conducted at least every three years and according to part 7150.0340, itea ■, or use a aonthly aonitoring aethod conducted according to part 7150.0340. item C. No release detection is required for suction piping that is designed and constructed to aeet the following standardst (a) the below-grade piping operates at* less than ataospheric pressure; {b> the below-grade piping is sloped so that the contents of the pipe will drain back into the storage tan.. if the suction is released; (c) only one check valve is included in each suction line; (d) the check valve is located directly below and as close as practical to the suction puap; and |e) a aetbod is provided that allows % coapliance with units (b) to (d) to be readily deterained. 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 7190.«32« hSOOnUENINTS fOR lASAIOOOS NAmZAL OMDUIC] •1QIIACB TANK SYfmS. Owners and operators of hasardous aaterial asdorground storage tank systeas aust provide reiease detection that aeets the requireaents in iteas A and b. A. Release detection at esiating hasardous aaterial underground storage tank systeas aust aeet the requireaents for ■h- /i .. 1 -.iJkdla ' - • " ■....................................................V ^ ,,.J1 ■•# -m->>-•-• H'l 1 jhi*- :.i .,■■ h&k SV: ■5''■" :& UW''- if& 'I - v>, JS'//./. r' :. ‘Z ' ;4V,.'';,.lr'"*4 i I"'#*; m '#'■ W¥I J ■! Itf-*; ttB- ■I'*/'-l-iU-- •?. mf •<; .'. W->r i’; 1 2 i 4 5 S 7 t 10 11 12 13 14 15 10 17 ^8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 20 29 30 31 37 33 34 39 36 M OS/13/91 (;ir/:scit I cmp/bo Aaii34 p«crolcun undcroround storaoc tank systcas in pact 71S0.0310 by tha d«t«s »«t forth In part 71S0.0300. ly Oaetaber 22. 199S. •11 axisting hazardous aatarial undarground stociga tank systcas must acat tha ralaasa datectlon caguiramants for naw systcas In itas 0. ■ • * 0 B. Ralaasa dataetion at naw hazardous SMtarial undarground storaga tank systaas must meat tha raquiraaants in •v ■uhitaaa (1) to (S): (1) Sacondary containment aystams must ba,. .. dasignad#-eonstruetad* and installad to: (a) contain ragulatad substancas ralaased from tha tank systaa until thay are datactad and ramovad; (b) pravant tha rclaasa f regulated substancas to tha anvlconmant at any tlaa during the operational lita of tha undarground storaga tank system; and (c) be checked for evidence of a release at least every 30 days. Tha provisions of part 7045.0528 may be used to comply with this subitem. (2) Ooubla^walled tanks must be designed. - constructed, and installad to: (a) contain a release from any part of the inner tank within tha outer wall; and (b) detect tha failure of tha inner wall. C3) external liners. Including vaults, must be dasignad. constructed, and Installed to; (a) contain 100 percent of tha capacity of the largest tank within its boun^ry; |b) pravant tha intarferanea of precipitation or groundwater intrusion with tha ability to contain or detect a rale aa of ragulatad substances; and (e) surround tha tank completely, for asanpla. it is capable of preventing lateral as wall as vertical migration of ragulatad substancas. (4) Underground piping mst bo equipped with secondary containment that satisfies tha ra^qulramants of subitem 1 1 '3 j:-.; 'S’i5!.'' '.V.,-».. ■■■ •''iiK: v;»:<-' fw. ^ir.*'Jli-: :i!. ■ »- . 9^ ¥ - --t-Tw ' UMt.:' ■ ite*' SI+ .*^r'.- ■• . i:A- I#’ ^ ,V-»»-*^-, .,•■.■• r f. 'S0- .'■Vw iSb'-|i|§C'^' 1^'rS:'' rite: i 05/13/91 IXCVISOll I CMH/30 AJIli34 1 2 3 4 5 i 7 t 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1< II), for cxanpl*, trench liners end jeekeeinq of double*welled pipe. In addition, underground piping that conveys regulated substances onder pressure oust be equipped with an autoaatie line leak detector according to part 7150.0340, itea A. IS) Other oethods of release detection eay be used if owners and operators! |a) deaonstrate to the eoNsissioner that an alternate Mthod can detect a release of the stored substance as effectively rs any of the aethods allowed in part 7150.0330. iteas ■ tor X. can detect a release of petroleua; |b) provide inforaation to the coaaissioner on effective corrective action technologies, health risks, and eheaical and physical properties of the scored substance, and the characteristics of the underground storage tank site: and |c) obtain apprevai froa the conihissioner to use ti^ alternate release detection method before the ihstallation and operation of the new underground storage tank system. 19 20 21 22 23 24 29 2f 27 2f 29 30 II 32 33 34 35 7150.0330 HCTBODS OP RELCA5C OCTCCTION POh TANKS. Each aethod of release detection for tanks used to aeet the requireaents of part 7150.0310 aust be conducted according to iteas A to X. A. Product inventory control or another test of equivalent perforsiance oust be conducted aonthly to detect a ^•iaaae of at least 1.0 percent flowthrough plus 130 gallons on a aonthly basis in the following aanner: 11) inventory volume aeasureaents for regulated substance inputs, withdrawals, and the amount still reaaining in the tank are recorded each operating day: 12) the oquipaent used is capable of aeasuring Che level of product over the full range of the tank's height to the nearest one-eighth of an inch: 13) the regulated substance inputs are reconciled with delivery receipts by aeasureaent of the tank inventory volusM before and after delivery; A( •vnswtw . -4ii ■I 1 •4 ''1 i" ? i '1 ;/• -i 1 ■-jtoKYfxiff ■ J! -«w a*"Ta S^v’A- V ai^ '- > Ai ’* 1-KV>. «V^*: V><-V ^.' ■■•. . :■ ‘ ■" %. ; >’ ■ m- 4?;'i ■ as ; ' M' itei >•; rji, ■;..» m ;*’i'MM- •'5rifr*^'.v, i'--:5,i-;.,U'-,-'‘ -^' •■ W:f- I . . ' iriVf ' .-v' ; ;’m ’•J' ' •' K^-'. V'.’ i" P><v ■»> rl'vf-: 1 2 3 4 9 f 7 • 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 .V 19 20 21 2? 23 24 25 26 27 21 29 30 31 32 33 34 39 3f ■ S’ 05/13/91 (aSVISOR 1 ex'*'90 Aai934 (4) deliveries are aade tMrou^n a drsp tube that extends to within one foot of the tank botton: (5) product dispensinq is octered and recorded within the Ideal standards for seter calibration incorporated by reference at part 7600.6800} and (6} the uasureaent of any water level in the boctoo of the tank is aade.to the nearest one*eiqhth of an inch at least once a awnth. Practices described in Aaerican Petroleum institute 1621. Recoaeiended Practice for Bulk Liquid Stock Control at Retail Outlets, may be used, where applicable, as guidance in meeting the requirements of this item. B. Manual tank gauging may be used as described in this item to meet the requirements of part 7150.0310. item k. (1) For tanks with capacities of 1.000 gallons or less, weekly manual tank gauging may be used as the sole method of release detection. (2) For tanks with capacities of 1.001 to 2.000 gallons, manual tank gauging may be used in place of product inventory control in item A. For tanks not described in subitems (1) and (2). annual tank gauging may not be used to satisfy the provisions of part 7150.0310. item A. C. Manual tank gauging must meet the following requirementst (1) tank liquid level measurements are taken at the beginning and ending of a period of at least 36 hours during which no liquid is added to or removed from the tank.* (2) level measurements are based on an average of bwo consecutive stick readings at both the beginning and ending of the period; and (3) the equipsMHt used is capable of measuring the level of product over the full range of the tank's height to the nearest one-eighth of an inch A leak is suspected and subject to the requirements of Minnesota Btatutea. section 115.061. if t.ie variation between .J". ... V- VO-' Bm p*,t : *T* E/;'-J'ia.. y iS;’ ■ t?#' i; '; ter--'W^' ^s'*-!'•:>:. if V •' ■ TmmMh^f- Si:-- m-m- w^> \ l^r,>'ra-v m:^- y. is#:/ ipi#,;":•' # 05/13/Jl [REVISOR I CMR/30 AR1834 1 2 b«9innln9 and ending a««s'irtm*nts etreecds ►h* w«et(iy or monthly standards In the Collowir.g table: 3 4 5 f 7 Tanb Capacity t f 10 11 12 13 14 15 10 17 10 If up to SSO gallons SSl-1,000 gallons (ifhan largest tank la «4* > 73*) 1*000 gallons (If tank Ls 40* X 120*) 9eekly Standard (one test) Monthly standard (four-test avg.) Mlniaua Duration ot Teat p is tha ONLT leak detection method used: 10 gallons 9 gallons 36 hours 9 gallons 4 gallons 44 hours 12 gallons 0 gallons 98 hours 20 21 22 23 If manual tank gauging is combined with Tank Tightness Testing: 20 gallons 1} gallons 36 hours1*001-2.000 gallons 24 25 y 27 20 2f 30 31 S3 33 34 35 30 37 30 39 40 41 42 43 44 49 0. Tank tightness testing or another test of equivalent parforoance must be capable of detecting a O.l gallon per hour leak rate from any part of the tank that routinely contains product uhile accounting for the effects of thermal aspanaion or contraction of tha product* vapor pockats* tank daformation* evaporation or condensation* and tha location of the water table. C. Squipaent for automatic tank gauging that tests for tha loss of product and conducts inventory control must meet the following requirementst (1) the automatic product level monitor test can detect a 0.2 gallon pei hour leak rate from any part of tha tank that reutiasly contains product: and (2) inventory control or another test of equivalent pe/fomanoe is conducted according to tha raquiramonts of item A. r. Testing or monitoring for vapors witMn the soil gas of the escavatien sone must meet the following requirements: (1) the materials used as hackfili are sufficiently porous such as gravel* sand* or crushed rock* to readily allow diffusion of vapors from ralaases into the escavacion area: (2) the stared regulated substance* or a tracer ■ *0* ,‘|V.■rf; mi V '1 A \ 'I -t 1- fiitilBir rlHsiMTiiilfiilirii lii . ---- mm ‘ i ^ *W •, 'av.-.r ii^'"Sill'"’#.‘ --i |r^*‘ Ti'- ■ '.mm' 1;?^:^ ■ fen !?& • " ■"*life"" ■ ■ M0S.:f-S> ■ "> ■ K^!|g.V C'-‘ .-'. . ife: f%:.iv. '§^' ^m.. - m0- mg ^nv^■ •■ • m ife*-' >4: .* iii.,i 'v 2kf> -V ; , -P|3?# ^ %Wm.Ml'!-' c«^r-." ■' »i ■ >«r“- V •.'' ?^ ■ .. 'm.mm: ,».■ 1 2 3 4 5 < 7 f 10 11 12 13 14 15 IS 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2S 27 20 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 30 05/13/91 iRr/ISCR J C.MR/30 ARia34 essipouftd plACtd in tfi* tanic syscea* is sufficitntly volaci**« such as qasolln*. to tssult In a vapor level that is detectable by th« aonltocing devices located in the excavation tone in the event of a re>lease froa the tank; (3) the measurement of vapors by the monitoring device is not rendered inoperative by the groundwater, rainfall, or soil moisture or other known interferences so that a release could go undetected for more than 30 days: (4) the level of background contamination in the excavation sons will not interfere with the method used to detect releases from the tank; fS) the vapor monitoring points are designed and operated to detect any significant increase in concentration background of the regulated substance stored in the tank system, a component or components of that substance, or a tracer compound placed in the tank system; (6) in the underground storage tank excavation tone, the site is assessed to ensure compliance with the requirements in subitems (1) to (4) and to establish the number and positioning of vapor monitoring points that will detect (•Icatss within the excavation tone from any part of the tank that routinely contains product; and (7) vapor monitoring points are clearly marked and secured to avoid unauthorised access and tampering. <j. Testing or monitoring for liquids in the groundwater must meet the provisions of chapter 4725, pu^t m comply uith local approvals or permits when located within _a local public rleht-^f-wav, as well as meet the following requirements: CD the regulated substance stored is immiscible in water and has a specific gravity of less than one; (2) groundwater is never more than 20 feet from the ground surface and the hydraulic conductivity of the soil between the underground storage tank system and the monitoring wells or devices is net less than O.Ol centimeters per second, for example, the soil should consist of gravels, coarse to •v n««isaf \ % •i^ & 1 ^--‘r.:-' v :k :k. V, St'- -•ifv S’*!*.. V\r!^:sl miA'- V llfr- p!'-' 81 'v* iir WV' !- . pipF.. Kit,:sasr ^ ' '7 IS®' 1f- 1 2 3 4 5 < 7 I f 10 11 12 13 14 15 10 18 19 20 2] 22 33 24 2$ 30 27 20 29 30 31 32 33 34 39 30 05/13/91 (REVISOR 1 CMR/aO AR1834 ■cdiuoi s«nds« coarse silts* or other permeable eaterials; (3) the slotted part of the monitoring wall easing must'be designed to prevent migration of natural soils or filter pack into the well and to allow* entry of regulated substance on the water table into the well under both high and lew groundwater conditions: (4) monitoring wells are sealed from the ground surface to the top of the filter pack: (9) monitoring wells or devices intercept the escavation'tone cr are as close to it as is te:hnically feasible: (6) the continuous monitoring devices or manual methods used can detect the presence of at least one'*eighth of an inch of free product on top of the groundwater in the monitoring wells: (7) within and Immediately below the underground storage tank system excavation rone* the site Is assessed to ensure compliance with the requirements in subitems (1) to (5), and to establish the number and positioning of monitoring wells or devices that will detect releases from any part of the tank that routinely contains product; and (8) monitoring wells are clearly marked and secured to avoid unauthorised access and tampering. I. Interstitial monitoring between the underground storage tank system and a secondary barrier immediately around or beneath it mmy be used* but only if the system is designed* constructed* and Installed to detect a leak from any part of the . tank that routinely contains product and also meats one of the requirements of subitems (1) to |3). (1) For double-walled underground storag: tank systems* the sampling or testing method can detect a release through the inner wall in any part of the tank that routinely contains product. The previsions outlined in the Oteel Tank Institute's ftandard for Dual Wall Onderground Storage Tanks may be used as guidance for aspects of the design and construction of underground oteel double-walled tanks. I •? '••'*• v'vi ?-- • •i^nr-------------^ 'T’.'w ■,. f ^ V- ^WM^>ify:' ' f'p. ";<!v<. i.Vii< te ''**' .• '*■ Ai" ; '^■ 1%-^^ far"',.' V fi-m i ||:':Av' y rV-''<r-^> ■■? gr, S ^&V'"tifmtf >K;r£,s* ■' JSf:. !!»£’? el''r/'£ i®li ,> .:» :-x»il« 'ir'r?;' iSM. 1 2 3 4 5 f 7 • 9 10 11 12 13 14 19 If 17 >• 19 20 21 22 23 24 29 2f 27 at 29 30 31 32 33 34 39 3f OS/13/91 lar/ISOR 1 CMR/9D AR1434 S^SkfeL'l'i':'''lfe-,.>-, ,' _ bt. . r . 12) For underground storage tank systems with a secondary barrier within the excavation zone* the sampling or testing aethod used can detect a release between the underground storage tank systeo and the secondary barrier according to the # following requlreaents: ._ . . - ^iv- ''t-.‘ (a) the secondary barrier around or beneath . • - • • • ^ • - the landerground storage.tank systea consists of artificially . • * % ^ • • • constructed aaterial that is sufficiently thick and iaperaeable* .f • - * - being at least 10** centiaeters per second for the regulated ♦ a substance stored* to direct a release to the aonitoring point and permit its detection; (b) the barrier is compatible with the e regulated substance stored so that a release from the underground storage tank system will not cause a deterioration of the barrier allowing a release to pass through undetected; (c) for cathodically protected tanks* the secondary barrier aust be installed so that it docs not interfere with the proper operation of the cathodic protection system; (d) the groundwater* soil moisture* q/ rainfall will not render th.^ testing or sampling method used inoperative so that a release could go undetected for more than 30 days: ' (e) the site is assessed to ensure that ^ne •% secondary ^-^rrier is always above the groundwater and nut in a 29-year flood plain* unless the barrier and monitoring designs m are for use under such conditions} and (f) monitoring wells and vapor aonitoring points are clearly aarked and secured to avoid unauthorised access and taapering. 13) for tanks with an internally fitted liner* an automated device can detect a release between the inner wall of the tank and the liner* and the liner is compatible with the substance stored. t.- Any ether type of release dctcekion aethod* or coabination of aethods* can be used if: I i ■! i 'S,*7 i I4 I •s ■i* •Jm ni iI .-•Osis fe:-— r^f» 'r-------^ >’■ 'ii.' *»'■ffe: mi/fe' ir'¥ ksI;'#-Pw#.' '» ■ » . »• ♦ -.• ■• k/0/. '^V.'t P*.' * f ’ ■' - ■ «3rt' &pi ' -.f^- mm OS/13/91 (Itr/:SOR I C.MR/3D AR1834 1 2 3 4 9 C 7 • 9 10 11 12 13 (1) CAfi dctccc M 0«2 9^11on pvf houf lc4k r4CC «r a rtlease of iso gallons within a aonth with a probability of datoetion of 0.9S a«id a probability of falso alara of OTOS; and (7) tho ownar and oparator can daaonatrata to cha coMiaalonar that tha aathod can datact a ralaasa as affactivaly as any of tha aathods allowad In itans 0 to ■ and obtain tha eoMisaionar's prior approval of tha aathod. In cooparlng ■athodSf tha eooMlsaionar shall eonsldar tha sisa of ralaast that tha oathod can datact and tho fraquancy and raliabllity with which it can bo datoctad. it tha nathod is approvad by tha coaoissionar* tha ownar and oparator oust cooply with any conditions isposad by tha coaoisaionar on its usa to ansura tha protoction of huaan haalth and tha anvironaant. ; 14 15 14 ^17 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 24 27 20 29 30 31 71S0.0340 HETBODS OP JtXLCASE DETECTION FOR PZPXNC. Each nathod of ralaasa dataccion for piping usad to naat tha raquiranants of part 7150.0300 aust ba conducted according to itans A to C. A* Nathoda which alart tha operator to tha prasanca oO a leak by rastricting or shutting off tha flow of regulated substaneaa through piping or triggering an audible or visual alara aay ba used only if they datact leaks of thraa gallons par hour at tan pounds par square inch line prassura within one hour* An annual test of tho operation of tha leak detector aust ba conducted according to tha aanufacturar's raquirasMnts. a. A periodic test of piping aay ba conducted only if it can datact a 0*1 gallon par hour leak rata at one and ona^half tiaas tha operating prassura. C. Any of tha aathods in part 7150.0330* itaaa r to 7# aay ba used if they are designed to detect a ralaasa froa aay part of tha uadargrouad piping that routinely contains regulated substances. 32 7150.0390 RELEASE DETECTION REC0R0RCSPXH6. 33 Owners and operators shall aaiataia records according to 34 part 7150.0240 dsaonetrating coapllaace with applicable 35 raquiraaants of parts 7150.0300 to 7150.0350. These records m. r --f’Mi ■i -yt d "I .1 I 4 i;,. - :•, '•..■r---' . •• ■VV^■K' fm. pU' ■ pt'':'.;;-v. ^ mw'H^ -■ ifill: |3«S6?pfj - . . . -.- • •’ V:"»y WMm l< %'■ .. y- *vK' 'm. F«f "■1&.'. ■ww«.'f • •( < -4 . ■....r sc* '^A-:Wf ^;:irVVwSl4,i* fFJrtS'. ;>.. '*■t Ml j'zp- p '’' ' / v> ^ “V. vr'.'ii . . . m§4 rm0-: 1 2 3 4 5 f 7 t f 10 11 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 30 21 22 23 24 25 2i> 27 2f 29 30 31 32 31 34 35 05/13/91 (Rivxsoa 1 CMR/ao AR1834 ■use Include the requirsaents of ieens A to C. a: All writeen perforasne* clsias psceslninq to siry ralsasa dsttceion sysesa used, and the Banner in which these elaias have been justified or tested by the equipment ■anufacturer or installer, ausc be aaincained for as lonq as the systea is beinq used to eoaply with the requireaents of this chapter. B. The results of any saaplinq, testinq, or ■onitorinq oust be aaintained for at least ten years. C* Hritten docuaentation of all calibration, aaintenance, and repair of release detection equipment pqraanenely located on-site aust be aaintained for at least ten years after the servicinq work is completed. Any schedules of required calibration and maintenance provided by the release detection equipoMnt aanufaccurer aust be retained as long as the systea is beinq used to comply with the requirements of this chapter. 0. Docuaentation of the commissioner's approval of alternate release detection aethods under part 7150.0330, itea X, Bust be aaintained for as long as the aethods are being used to comply with the requiresMnts of this chapter, cvr-^r-fotvics ONonciioaiib'fTOiuiiGC tamc systems and closdre 7190.0408 TOirOIIAilY CLOSOBS. Sttbpart 1. BequirMwats. In addition to the requirements of chapter 7910* the Minnesota Dnifora rire Code, owners and operators, oust comply with the pro'^isions in eubparts 2 to 4 • * relating to temporary closure. Subp. 2. Operatioa sad maistesasM dariaq twporary closure. Nhen an underground storage tank system is temporarily elosed, owners and operators aust continue operatioa and . * maintenance of corrosioo protection aceordlaq to part 7190.0210, and any release detection according to parts 7150.0300 to 7190.0390. Belease detection is not required as long as the underground storage tank system is eapey. The underground storage tank system is eapty when all materials have been Ap#rOv#^ ■ ''' V Si I 1 i 'i-i •I ~ 1 I * 111 ifliS ii r I ' i«a !iK>>'s -'i * ■ A^: 1^#te<IP^:i^P'-': .^i5W;ss-fe- :V V K,«-#.-t- r-lii) mim ;I ■T ,t e*ti iw»£^ ::=' ' - •; 05/13/91 laEVISOR I CW80 AA1834 1 2 3 4 9 • 7 f 9 10 u 13 13 14 19 li 17 ^ ^11 19 20 21 22 23 24 29 removed using comaonly employed practices so that no more than 2.9 eentinetees, or one inch, of residue, or 0.3 percent by weight of the total capacity of the underground storage tank system, remain in the system. • •. • ' rvj.:'.T. .z , ■ _ Subp. 3. Tamkia~o'ut of series 90 daya.XWlien an underground storage tank system is temporarily closed for 90 • ^ ... - days or more, owners and operators must also comply with the following requirementsI A* lease vent I'nce open and functioning; and B. cap and securt- .*11 other lines, pumps, passageways, and appurtenances. Subp. 4. Tanks out of service one year. When an underground storage tank system is temporarily closed for more m bbnn 12 months, owners and opyators must permanently close the underground storage tank system if it does not meet either performance standards in part 7190.0100 for new underground storage tank systems or the upgrading requirements in part 7190.0110, except that the spill and overfill cguipnenc requirements do not have to be net. Owners and operators must perswnently close the substandard underground storage tagk systems st the end of this ll'menth period according to parts 7190.0410 to 7190.0440, unless the commissioner provides an •sttnsion of ^e 12*moakh temporary closure'period. Owners and ^•rstors must complete a site assessment according to part 7190.0420 before such an extension can be applied for. 20 27 20 29 30 31 32 33 34 39 7190.0410 POMMOn CLOfOlt AMO aUNm-rM-SIBTXCC TO^fTORACE OP MOMBSHEMO fOMtAMOi. •ebpart 1. Bmquicemanta. In addition to the requirements of chapter 7910, the Minnesota Oniform fire Code, owners and operators must comply with the provisions im subpsrts 2 to 7 relating to permanent closure end ehanges*im»service. Subp. 2. HotieoToC mlosoro or rbsmto'Am 'iiwrvico.*^ At least teii days before beginning either permanent closure or a ^ • change-in>service under subparts 3 and 4, owners and operators must notify the coamUsaioner of their intent to periMnently aservea 1 ■i : pr . . . . . ..^mByr ^ ■ ,:x^'.V Q/ Ca t- . . .... .^. Ron Moorser City Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director July 23, 1992 Spring Cleanup Yardwaste Program Costs V!' % year the Spring Cleanup and Yardwaste Program far exceeded our ’'^expectations. During the two spring cleanup days, the following items and )is& amounts were received:i: - c^ *" !?V i K' • May 2 and May 9 34 containers of construction material 28 containers of debris 170 appliances 47 televisions $ 8,500.00 8,875.18 1,480.00 282.00 teV!’'Labor $19,137.18 2,052.00 Total $21,189.18 S^i' •. . wm..4^ Yardwaste April 25 - Nay 16 thru June 27 container cost haul brush chip brush :t;. ,v •>&■• Labor $ 750.00 1,280.00 4.620.00 $ 6,650.00 1.641.00 rv ■ ./•ft*?' Total Grand Total $ 8,291.00 $29,480.00 VV-Siv i.'*f: In addition, we received 330 tires, 90,000 lbs. of scrap metal and 4,059 lbs. of automotive batteries. These items were not a cost to the City and are all items that will be recycled. i?PSifi ■■ Si The amount budgeted to*. Spring and Fall Cleanup and the Yardwaste Program for 1992 is $20,000.00. The City does charge a fee of $12.00 per year to pay the costa of Curbside Recycling, Spring and Pall Cleanup and the Yardwaste Program. ■Bt i*#'' The income generated from that fee amounts to $26,352.00. At this time, we are short $3,128.00 and we have not started the fall aehedule for yardwaste or the fall cleanup which is usually held in the middle of October. i j.' i- »• ,rkMS&Miub 4 i S3 4 > 0 X i B. •N mm - ,'.1.1- Au I : - - “ -7"- ■j7mm-i-r>'\.'ii' - •^S ,-^- ;v NMII6 July 23,1992 B«caus(i the prograB Is so well received by the residents, I feel we should (So o fell cleanup but perhaps scaled down a bit. JM Vhe following are suggestions for consideration: %7 : :■• :■ 'i. «5'- ' %fe, ■’ -ixi ?r# 0m m ^'''■ . iM mmi' '4'}j’"*.’%‘^' :<> ^ ‘ fa”'< •jiv ,u- -i ifkf:■ Blininate construction debris Charge a fee to televisions and appliances Continue the leaf drop off starting in Septeaber Continue the brush drop off but only one Saturday per i Consider volunteer labor Increase the annual recycling fee by an amount to cover all costs >nth V f i-1 :*^' ■ •V2 .S-i' i".I'-1 ,^i: • >I ■'ij ■^40;5S ■1 :r ...J, mmm.tfr^i'Tyx*^S'^!?,;.v’ ■ L..j,"-' 0';^iiir»* • **;s‘ 'V fe • ;^ •a-‘' ■ ®-i : . ., vC ■ • • * * m-¥ mA’ >i.',V- P#ia#,..K ill-, -v^ WM v.t-. S^*'^ ■■'?«* ’i-tf‘' V -:’jiv pStS:* ^'r'''r i%' I’J fe: m m.v:- ^ 'ft#?'::; £«'■- Hayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator July 23, 1992 Fire Service Alternatives "V^ ^ %0 /O As part of the city's efforts in exploring new opportunities for cost efficiencies and cooperative service delivery, the Council directed staff to review the current method of fire service delivery to determine if the city would benefit by making any changes in the way fire services are provided. The city currently contracts with 4 cities for fire service. The cities of Haple Plain, Mound and Wayzata provide service to the northwest portion, southern portion and eastern portion of the city respectively. The City of Long Lake provides service to the central portion of the city. Staff has completed a preliminary feasibility review of 6 fire service delivery options. It is staff's recommendation that the Council establish a worksession to allow follows: a detailed review of the options. The options are as 1. 2. Continue with the existing system. Partially expand the service areas of the peripheral cities based on response times. 3.Expand the service areas of the peripheral cities to provide total coverage to the city. 4. 5. Develop a satellite station in the Navarre area. Develop a new agreement with the City of Long Lake to provide Orono with a voice in the administration of the department commensurate with its level of funding. 6. The following is alternatives. Orono start its own volunteer fire department. outline of the analysis of thean 1.Existing System A. Advantages 1.) Fast response times to the area adjacent to the Long Lake city boundary. 2.) Long Lake has 2 tankers to serve the area that does not have water service. '3 B. Disadvantages 1.) It is possible to reduce Orono's costs changing to another option. by , •• 1i ■i J 3 i'•I ■ii ^I _ t. ^ iHfe'.'i i«»■ It, v''^ -i'."Pt 2. 3. K- '■• 2.) It is difficult to administer the contract with Long Lake. Partial Expansion of Coverage By the Peripheral Cities A. Advantages 1.) Response time to some areas of the city can be reduced. 2.) Could take greater advantage of the equipment in the peripheral cities, such as Wayzata's aerial truck. B. Disadvantages 1.) Would not significantely reduce current costs 2.) Does not address the difficulties in administering the Long Lake contract. The Peripheral Cities Expand Their Coverage to Serve the Entire City A. Advantages 1.) Will provide the same response time improvements as Alternative 2. 2.) Would reduce the number of contracts to be administered. 3.) This is the lowest cost alternative. 4.) Would take greater advantage of the equipment available from the peripheral cities. B. Disadvantages 1.) Those areas nearest to the Long Lake city boundary would have increased response times. However, all response times would remain within acceptable standards. 2.) Because the City of Orono funds approximately 801 of the Long Lake Fire Department budget, if Orono were to cancel the fire contract, the City of Long Lake would have to find alternative funding sources and/or significantly reduce their fire operation. 3.) As Long Lake explores alternative revenue sources one source could be a reduction in their police coverage. A reduction in their police coverage would have a significant impact on Orono's Police budget. Satellite Fire Station. This alternative is focused on the Navarre area. A more centralized area would be preferred, however, the Navarre area is the only area that has a pool of 9 i' V i I fin-irtiar I I AaajlfciiM'V r..'7■4^m i,"■i»s?s.i®B«r,* . /*' •. r-’ ISSk •■<.;■; 5. mM Psi,*' 4l>;.V:i ^ -r-1 ■■ :3;-- - •/■ '•>^t .cy'' '*a' ii y i : ■->r>r'* fep;-:. ■mi p# >-•■ ‘^ r ' ^ - ii:®i volunteers available for quick response to a station. A.Advantages 1.) Faster response times to the Navarre area and the area to the north. B.Disadvantages 1.) High costs of building and equipping a station. 2.) Because the Navarre area is in the southern part of the cityr a satellite station located there would not significantly increase the service area. A new fire service agreement with the City of Long Lake. Orono is in a very unique relationship with the City of Long Lake in that although Long Lake operates the fire department, Orono funds approximately 80% of the cost of the department. It therefore would be reasonable for the contract relationship to provide Orono with a voice in the administration of the department commensurate with its level of funding. A.Advantages 1.) Could improve communication between the cities concerning the administration of the department. 2.) Could make Orono staff resources available to assist in the administration of the department. B.Disadvantages 1.) This alternative alone would not provide the response time reductions or cost reductions provided by other alternatives. 6. Start an Orono Department. A. Advantages 1.) Orono would have full control of the operation and administration of the department. B.Disadvantages 1.) High cost of building and equipping station. fire 2.) Difficulty in recruiting a new group of volunteer firefighters to staff the department. 3.) Would not significantly improve response times from the current level. . /in.' i 'i 1 •I I i i 1 1 j J ^4 'i i i > • A-v*: ! - - V •i* j 9 • •-rr'5 ryi.' :.' 4v':^. ■‘frv:. ' A * .b|?pb " :, IKll'V r-Bl":.' liv-b ■> . r^itV WW gv •(jn^ •/' >t'ju .» fc ’■“r’K #, .'I?!!*- '•• # :■ .’ FT.'H'-Sl'- f- •■ * * TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council* Ron Moorse^ City Administrator July 21, 1992 ■&II 80BJBCT: Resolution Amending the Assessment Roll for the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project The Council at its May 18 meeting adopted the assessm nt roll for the Stubbs Bay sewer project. Since then a number of property owners have appealed the assessment amounts. Agreements have been reached with a majority of those who appealed their assessments. The Oxford and the Cygnet and Leaf area have both agreed to a reduced assessment amount in exchange for providing easements at no cost to the City. The Council has directed similar agreements be worked out with the Bederwood and Bayside North areas. The amended assessment amounts are us follow*^: 1. 2. 3. 4. Oxford Area Cygnet & Leaf Area Bederwood Area Bayside North Area $13,500 11,400 11,500 11,000 The Council may at this time adopt the amended assessment roll. **NOTE ** Assessment Roll will be provided at the Council meeting 7/27/92. .W' • hhm- ■ .■ 5.: sli# ->»r . iZL,y- - - . t-S,; *?*■ it&/ V Cci'ir--ri B##; l».' '■ rj'ir.f.'*.^rH-' ’I'M:'-.K?;am-'^- K-r V ^te%:'vlV. I®‘"te’a#*; ■■ IM' '%<'■ ,#ga A RESOLOTION ADOPTING STUBBS BAY SANITARY SEWER ASSESSHENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement of sanitary sewer in the Stubbs Bay Are?. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COONCIL OF ORONO, HINNESOTA: Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein 'ncluded is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2.Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1993 and shall bear interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1992. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installements. 3. pK:^' The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the city treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the city treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. Partial prepayment may be allowed in accordance with ordinances which are existing or which the City may choose to adopt in the future. mm m -e- i A "u a /a "'■A ::.4 KmW7 -r ^^■ 'ii4t ■’. ■?:Sp. « ’>y >• tif'K Xvv< * ... *.■ >.>:■ ^ -V ■rs-"S,u i i: >; i. f-H':-' i}' ' iW' ■“fe A RBSOLOTION ADOPTING STUBBS BAY SANITARY SEWER ASSBSSNBNT ROLL WHBRBASr pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement of sanitary sewer in the Stubbs Bay Area. HON THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OP ORONO, NINNBSOTA: 1.Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is lereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2.Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1993 and shall bear interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1992. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installements. 3.The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the city treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the city treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. Partial prepayment may be allowed in accordance with ordinances which are existing or which the City may choose to adopt in the future. i i ■iV k' .IHiA ■■ y ^Pi' • V- ‘ t p ■ 'v h RBSOLOTION ADOPTING STOBBS BAT SANITARY SBWER ASSESSMENT ROLL s^kT * , ■-ri/. ^ r by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as /all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement of / sanitary sewer in the Stubbs Bay Area. .■sir? '’Vi* NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BT THE CITY COONCIL OF dRONO, MINNESOTA: 1. mm Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. •i ' mi ■*; ■■ Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1993 and shall bear interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1992. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installaments. m:3. i# 'r * •V-fm- ' t - *- ■ . . . . The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the city treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the city treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November IS or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. Partial prepayment may be allowed in accordance with ordinances which are existing or which the City may choose to adopt in the future. 111. V.;- ^: * 1^.•< ■ . ' -j v.i i n J -V -. ffV'-. •■. - 4. ;,r-’>- ^^7-' I: i. •*';:■-~J^C Ifeir^v 1^:0' ^ m---m I e>^m; i?i A RBSOLOTION ADOPTING STUBBS BAT SANITARY SEWER ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement of sanitary sewer in the Stubbs Bay Area. HOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BT THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO, MINNESOTA: 1.Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2.Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1993 and shall bear ireterest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1992. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installements. 3.The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the city treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the city treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. Partial prepayment may be allowed in accordance with ordinances which are existing or which the City may choose to adopt in the future. I|.- iifcl' "■ -r'-" ■' - t;.'■% 1 'f S' 1 il w "ii. >•1 -4 ■ ■« ■■V Isas.Pfe»'. ‘Meut-:-..- K ■' <44^^' ‘ --«"v^''' ■'^ ■ !' W0% ‘^K'vi. K RBSOLOTION ADOPTING STOBBS BAY SANITARY SEWER ASSESSMENT ROLL -i'- I’V^-- *mm ... '■’i;^-a. ‘te-. WHBRBASr pursuant to proper notice duly given as rsquired by lawr the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement of sanitary sewer in the Stubbs Bay Area. V/ '/ NOW THSRBPORB, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COONCIL OF OKOHO, MINNESOTA: 1. IfcSMfe- -lei >!•»- Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. I 6^®i' ■ hKn-fd mi?'mm- Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1993 and shall bear interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1992. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installaments. : V> - j 3. 0m n T mM. m -- The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the city treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the city treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. Partial prepayment may be allowed in accordance with ordinances which are existing or which the City may choose to adopt in the future. .4.; ■■ ,.v.. ■ 'XV j- .'C.Vi*3 ;; •-V mi4 4 i i •V ~n ■mm ■■ -W j •« 1 .A* ;. •■ ^ «5ii ’ ^'■'' -'V f, Kn V i’-‘-> - -V .... r .*-'-. ;• i. ' -•i'.; h RBSOLOTION ADOPTING STUBBS BAY SANITARY SEWER ASSBSSNBNT ROLL »^r,;-- •, ■; px-'C--' ■'■-'V' WHBRBAS, pursuant tc proper notice duly given as teguirsd by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement of sanitary sewer in the Stubbs Bay Area. ■OW THBRBFORE, BB IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COONCIL OF ORONO, HimiBSOTA: 1. t‘p '- - Such proposed assessment^ a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof^ is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein^ and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. r* §irnmmmm / iMStP- Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1993 and shall bear interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1992. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installements. 3. ^ ‘mmk” The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the city treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the city treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. Partial prepayment may be allowed in accordance with ordinances which are exir,ting or which the City may choose to adopt in the future. •■J 1 'iA •T iIm 't m % i .11 'F- ' j- = - :V. M ^1: 4 ■^V^v V f-.-'r ■’ -' d'*■ * -* J’L*.■.K:IC'K.v,;^^ ■ . t'=>.y ,V wyy^-Cr *^ • . .1- * V r • . ' t .• \ %iK- ■••■i:«%Tl :-a>ri-3i . ... .V fe" ■' ii i??%, 4« m .'^: a-"?® • Ark-.b; Bi#!% -..V The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Council this 27th day of July, 1992 f!;# t^. .•.■vT:Vy .■■Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor A|T1ST: A, sm ’ ■ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Dorothy N. Hallin, City Clerk W&my Mymm p'#' teMii iJK'Sfe., ,'v Pf^SI:: WM v»;' '? :^‘ >: r. s » > • 4' '•* ■' ■ ■ ■'^ rC: , vf^ • "V m '•iM,s# ^ -SvP^ ■ m 111 ■•a J 4 rr^yF!:-rr,'^,,•’T’ '-jry |S^.‘;.Mv''’’'''' kMWh'''v- ^<?y./c^ % tlOMs -:.® . tl'.. . t r^*-' '-i-' *'^' ;tf-' DATES ^ SUBJECT Mayor and City Council Ron Moorsor City Administrator July 21, 1992 C'l'/p.'^0/ A.‘f';. %0 Ordinance Amendment to Allow an Extended Time Period for Hookup to the New Stubbs Bay Sewer System :s--‘ SP r'l, * '^T. The current City ordinance calls for hookup to a new sewer system within a period of 16 months from the date of completion of the sewer project. This allows 2 construction seasons for the hookup. In response to requests from many of the Stubbs Bay ](4iUi<|#nts for a longer time period for hookup, the Council agreed to a 5 year maximum hookup period. This extended time period is contingent upon the existing septic systems continuing to function properly. Mike Gaffron has drafted the attached ,, ordinance setting out the conditions under which an extension of to 5 years would be allowed. Ifv;' . w #■ sitfe’-' . ,v iC- ■ ' - -w ♦ “ • ’>• 7' / ■» ^ P- 'A KM?"- JW' sss*? -pi fi: ■V*i 4 A *. .V’.i: i •1 i ■I '3 i I i 'S;'".-^'v ‘ *p;j';r ■■ ;.‘sfei .. ?r*fv>pie.'fcii''^te.-%' -i ■«6t Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator PROMi Michael P. Gaffron, Ass^. Planning & Zoning Administrator July 22, 1992 Ordinance Amendment ~ Mandatory Hookup Standards for Stubbs Bay Area i : DATE: 80BJBCI. If; is Of Bshibits pis A - Proposed Ordinance B - Excerpt from May 18th Assessment Hearing Minutes Dleeoeslon At the continuation of the Stubbs Bay assessment hearing on May tep 18th, Council voted 5-0 to extend the connection period for Stubbs Bay project area residents to five years, with some caveats. The proposed ordinance is based on che Council motion, the discussion held May 18th, and staff's interpretation of Council's goal in extending the connection period. |if One factor perhaps not made clear in the May discussions is that ife would likely find that most of the existing trench drainfields (which account for probably 90% of the project area) would be classified "non-conforming" if soil borings w«re done to verify the depth to mottling. Certainly, it was not Council's intent that only 10% of the residences in the project area be allowed the five year connection period. Therefore, the ordinance has been drafted such that those systems found to be non-conforsdlng only due to their lack of separation from settling nones, will only have to connect if our determination of that non-oonformity results from an inspection triggered by a building perait or variance application (as required by the Shoreland Ordinance)• jr.V'. If in the next five years Orono chooses to initiate a program to __ ... . .. _ _ _ _— _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _verify depths to mottling on all shoreland septic systems, the ..A ^ . ... .. • A. • . m. ^ W ^ ^ ^ ^ A JT f •• Api ordinance is written so that such determination won't affect the five £ year connection allowance for Stubbs Bay project residents. m ;:tf. f>M: c fi1 V ’S 'll M -.V --1' ■*< ■; !'K'^•^f./v, >/;illiipcr- artily 22, 1992^ r' ..-■fw * A synopsis of the proposed connection requirements is as follows; Mm sSSi". ■ fcisftr> : 0§m ^■• '■ ■ Connection Deadline (From Date Project is Declared Available for Connections): 90 days: Failing systems Bolding tanks 16 Months: ■' ' ' Drainfields less than 3' above OHW of Stubbs Bay Drainfields less than 75* from Stubbs Bay or less than 75* from Stubbs Bay Creek Drainfields less than State minimum 50' separation from a well ^4/.::^-,5 ■ 5 Years: Properties categories not in one of the 90 day or 16 month Other: 5 V- , 4'- MB00-' Systems that fail during the 5 year period will have to connect in 90 days Systems declared non-conforming due to a permit- or variance-triggered inspection will have to connect in 1 year. w ' ferhaps the one listed requirement that could be arguable is the day holding tank connection. In past projects, we have allowed the i^fttll 16 month period for holding tanks. Usually, the economics of miaBOUts will dictate whether the owner of a holding tank connects it ?w4^t away or waits the full 16 months. We can leave this at 90 days dr allow the full 16 montlis, whichever Council feels is most appropriate »■ ^ iitaf f laoomiMaidatioii City Attorney Tom Barrett has reviewed the draft format and finds it acceptable. His only caution is that this will set a precedent for ^^aimilar requests in future sewer projects. i If Council agrees with each of the provisions of the draft ^ ©idimance, staff would recommend its adoption as drafted. :4mm iM ■y -»/<tv•" ■w' ^ J ^t -«v^^v!- -::■ .•* .:vte‘yi'ff:.mV‘ ■5^. 'it- % «/■ A■ • K* • '-'^ *fM::f "■■“;■?•*<'■. .... ■#•' ' .y- •; AM ORDIMAMCB TO BZBMPT PROPBRTIBS fflTHIll THB STUBBS BAT SBNBR PROJBCT ARBA FROM THB PROVISIONS OF OROMO MOHICZPAL CODB 8BCTI0H 12.30, SUBDIVISION 4 (B) (1) AMD BSTABLZSHIM6 RBOUIRBMBHTS FOR COMMBCTION TO SEWER FOR PROPBRTIBS NITBIM TBB STUBBS BAT SBWER PROJECT AREA •- 0'- 1^" WHBRBASf the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") has ordered the installation of Aunicipal sewer trunk lines and laterals to serve the Stubbs Bay area j. and P-WHBRBASf the Stubbs Bay sewer project area includes 137 properties or groups of properties which will be provided with sewer connection stubs brought to the property boundary, said properties and groups of properties being legally described by Property Identification Numbers in Exhibit A attached; and V' :wm - WHBRBASf the Stubbs Bay sewer project is anticipated to be complete and available for connection in late 1992 or early 1993; and rv mw “'rt?, I&5■I- iJA’' WHBRBASf Municipal Code Section 12.30, Subdivision 4 (B) (1) requires that the owners of all buildings where municipal sewer becomes available shall connect such buildings to the City sewer within 16 months of the availability of the sewer; and IP -I WHBRBASf in order to reduce the immediate financial burden on homeowners in the Stubbs Bay sewer project area, the City Council has agreed to extend the length of the required connection period for properties in the project area. ordain: MOW THBRBFOBB, the City Council of Orono does hereby Section 1. The owners of properties within the Stubbs Ba|^ sewer project area are hereby exempted from the provisions o Municipal Code Section 12.30f Subdivision 4 (B) (1), but shall be subject to the following provisions: 1. 1 r. The owners of properties which fall into one or more of the following categories shall connect the existing residence to municipal sewer within 90 days of its availability: Page 1 of 3 S'- ■ ..I ■^■1^‘yi’'. :>v.JL i .'..Jcfc. il.u ^ . • r * • A.7^^■A-'■AI 77^sitmfK'^ W¥‘', f ■ m:, '■.^ fer .. 7 Wii ' 2. ^1*;» % i' ^r’;55^:-v-A- : •?. I ••:: ■ mB: 3. »f"'-p'^ ' 4. . S^:' 10"i0.0 ^fe.7 mm r./^X-m '7^01.: m-i •: ::> ? 7>^;f : ^!' -J 7«- a.Properties with septic systems that are discharging to the surface. b.Properties using holding tanks as a primary or partial method of sewage disposal. The o%#ners of properties which fall into the following category shall connect the existing residence to municipal sewer within 16 months of its availability: Properties located within 500 feet of the shoreline of Stubbs Bay which have drainfield trenches or beds located less than the required 36 inch vertical separation above the normal lake elr ion of 929.4' MSL. The vertical separation dii :e is measured to the bottom of the rock in th«^ crench or bed. b.Properties that have drainfields located less than 75* from the shoreline of Stubbs Bay or Stubbs Bay Creek. c.Properties that have drainfields located less than the State minimum 50' separation from a water well. The owners of all properties which do not fall into one of the categories in Item 1 or 2 above shall connect the existing residence to the City sewer within sixty (60) months of the date the sewer becomes available# except that any property which experiences septic failure during the 60 month connection period shall make such connection within 90 days of notice of such failure. In the event that a septic system located in the Stubbs Bay sewer project area and within the Shoxeland Overlay District is determined to be classified non-conforming as a result of an inspection triggered by application for a building penoit or variance pursuant to NunicipaJ Zoning Code Section 10.56# Subdivision 17 (O# the owner of such system shall be required to connect the existing residence to the sewer within one year of notification of the non-conforming classification. Page 2 of 3 mrt -i; 'J ’■■r' h Iv >,ji fi! ■J U l:riS Jiuu^ ■.-. %, .is,; •■T*--•••'*■»m ‘-■*■v^;y mnAn'.-'£•-■-• A' i,%r’^ i*. ■* ^ 5/ ■ ■ •' » |v.: .;■¥•.’ ■•*•••>■•,. mM, Isw' M>'- 'J'-.-l' |K: H.. ;^r / . Im; i:f‘ ifm Pi V, . ifcT • *;«» j-' p: S'*'"liv* 4'wfS'Stf-Kwr- mm.t.%Km* 5.If during the 60 month connection period# the City Initiates a program to determine the conformity classification of ;a11 septic systems in the Shore land Overlay District# the Stubbs Bay sewer project area shall be exempt from such program to the extent that any systems classified as non'-conformlng solely as a result of such program shall not be subject to normal one year non-conformity elimination deadlir.3. e Section 2. Effective date. This ordinance shall be effective upon publication. Adopted Minnesota this by the City Council of the City of Orono# day of _ _ _ _# 1992, ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin# city Clerk Barbara A. Peterson# Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) 88. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) this The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me on day of # 19_ _* by Barbara A. Peterson C Dorothy M. Tallin# Mayor a city Clerk of the City of Orono# a Minnesota municipal corporation and said Instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 3 'r: -»*• HkVV ■■Sj■I J?" •i'.; i % -.. ’, r '. .-'>'■' A-' '.■^’ '.eS': ■• ....m' ' ■■Mas,:^L.,ec oc THE CONTINUATION OF THE STUBBS BAY ASSESSMENT HEARING minutes of the CONTINUAIion COUNCIL ON »1^FrVv HELD BY THE ORONO COUNCIL ON HELD MAY 18, 1992 1, restoration. _ ._ to go out. WHO further consider this i restoration. He ®**<e^ •^jthacks and sewering. He stated the main Hayor Peterson closed the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. S e ' J.bl>our ••k.d It »t.tf h.d look.d Into us I ns COBG funds to help residents with lower Income with the project. 0: rs:* t;?^'.‘«.%o^^^^l".Vto uV/ ,^ro%**t‘n;t ^^zV’'<^nT*x:LT, 1::“?; isi*.t ’-7th "BV.'ckVtVd .t th. .nd ot th. w..k. s*. I. Vi- Mayor P.t.rson clarified thst the money cannot be used to apply towards the entire project. iSc??uTr:2.I' and* 1 f“ tVa"t®*."r7. ““d noV hJve'"a'ny “."ppe*a ”if"«ufS be refunded to those residents. Goatten stated that th. money cannot be returned until the project Is completede %■> Butler clarified that i>ose In J^*j^*^^^5ead^l Ine Is set opposed to the Immediate w-te-certaln would need to beby the Council but noted a date certain establlahed. that when the project was bid, the apecifled. Butler W***"*^ ^-Jou do not U to the grocery store '2r."rVu.''*wuT t7e 9?5Se? ovir m price If a pound c.' butter". ?!1. TaiSa principal applies to the sewer project. Mayer Peterson and Jabbour •®''**^* j^tinne*date*for*connectlon20 y«r.*a:r.^a^^^"••«* « p?ove thllr e«tlc system was working to continue use. Callahan felt that those J" sVaff shou'ld have the final connect Immediately. functioning and can continue to bedecision on whether a system /"the owner should be used. He noted that If a 3^5 years for mandatoryrequired to connect to sewer. He felt that 3 5 years hookup would be appropriate. 5. ’ , -M- ' Mu s* '.f- y.. ■%1I f - * A ' ' ;•* V-pr- K . ^ : :V:‘ ’ ?i& ,','r . . f;'r::- '■: yV':-•■,»- ', m' %• ■ ^ /l_Sir* Sv=t'->Ifilsi, ' ■ ■ ■-- •S* iE-iS ' t' kfi0-iC:' V'^'Xv- -. ‘ Jc '-I'-* • < i‘.'T>;f,::t pill' ^ ■ ■ it- . , 1^-- V.^^; i-', ■''. ., •’ .■'' >'.JT ■ ■ te- 'Sii-V**' .'•* .** ■ Is;- ;, Lw;/;:<-- r^_ 'S.-----‘> 'iM-:; i«’¥ ' '. ; r ;. y-o” MINUTES OF THE CONTINUATION OF THE STUBBS BAY ASSESSMENT HEARING ”*• held by the orono council on HELD MAY 18, 1992 maatsa aaread that parawatars need to be established and !I?S?”dra7t criteria to d.tarmln. If a system Is functioning properly. Oaffron noted that various conditions would need '"??i Ha Indicated that failure would Include systems discharging to the Surface wSI la non-conforming systems may be a diaoharolng to the surface but too close to the water table based Si soM* borings. He stated that because of the raoulatlons. the ONR and PCA are saying that If an existing sySte Is too close to the water table. It Is a non-conforming system an must bs rsplacsd within a year. Jabbour stated that he understood *»•* <he PCA Is going to make a conscious effort to pursue enforcement. He *?'***f ^1, was ?;:ir^l^e*^7s•t" tt:*,/ir rSw^r. h. reminded the :S:i7o"*,*era‘*bo7d"a“ra°fore? V>n:\V°tl t^haJ ‘thS^have . moral ?si!^:urh:^r5■rlte “7o^7Ve;v^7t;^^;^^o7e^ Oxford Road and Cygnst Place. OAA^tan f«lt that the criteria should be evaluated for areas not to be Included. She asked If the trunk charge should be assessed to the two areas excluded. ■•KhAiip Asked If a new public hearing would be necessary to change iSroeeJ^lSInt rol I Include only a trunk charge to those areas. Barrett\teted the Coun= 11 has g l van "f‘>« Vr r.::: SenV.ThVlToVncI ::oul*d**need to order a reduced project by resolution and that th'- assessment would be effective to pay ror that reduced project. Butler suggested they decide on the time for required h^kup s £MiV'eiore Is aeeeesed city-wide to al taxpeyer, J?;;oe'ed .?.7e*.l»Vnt"wM I ^2.^ • *5^00 to S25.00 per year/per parcel tor 15 year Increase to a!I In Orono. Jabbour said he did not care If the property was required to hookup if solde • ’I fr*-■ IV .i.-- I .■ :■... 'i } %I V- ■ X>*-Sr. .. 5 «.- TUC ctiirbS bay assessment HEARING minutes of the CO'<”%*y°'VHE ORONO COUNCIL ON HELD NAY 18, 1992 it'f... L '•« Y f!’.' Iv ' ^ ' 'i:'• K f.lt that It could easily happen that a future owner would Sl'iSHwSr. of the required hookup charge. I b« unaware or in* . ^ i.asiiiv Barrett stated that Information would ^ot ^^e future d?scloted. He be'to *f * « icutt""_ _waa Informad would oa lo ' a.^ ♦hitt would ba very difficult... ..w... >.... f. .s... •• "■> >'”■ *' >rV'2i »• H*- Clty ordinanc»« ------ ;:::rcor.ct“ron* :‘TrX t°V7ono:rng'co%"dltfo^Tw‘’e ‘‘re ru;gtsted: •• _____a. 4«hd» sewer ,\ ■ _ ___ .A mi . a WB • 7 —r------ 2. All systems and/o^r less than 75* from the creek or ^ ^ within 16 months of Its well shall connect to the sewer w avallabiIity. ‘ i. V aDlilt/* 3. Any conforming ^wUhin^°^6 iClfiLmt^ "‘^SSIh systems will have had a useful service life of 15 years or more. ■ii * 4 Any conforming system constructed between Vl/7^ 1 shaI? connect systems shall have had a iK*seVv“rc.‘nre'o ’f be7wU “8 and^ 17 ysars. I aerviw* h I I 5 Any conforming *7***% “JvVnabM Uy or by it’ioful sertlc. life tor those systems. 'T.'V ■r ■A , rt " - "vvrn a“n; .-fe ‘ort-he-'pVrprtV s.^cidconnected upon any smi« StlICX9U ------ tart Jiy.n'^g' 'thr^aMi-rty Ve^fc;Vrg:^r?h^-%^:d “"of*\V.“Ve ^nth Standard connection period. urrently ^ asKsd If h. has ajoubl. mound tililUtiS^orb^IoJr^ou.re- to hookup. '* ■• VM t,’-. ■■>■. liil?H if.- •- 'iISfl'->v -:f •-: * •. tSMi.JfMA S’5.'"1■J -'j 3 '’j 1 > ? •4 A Je •rif4«> . m:m W-'' : ■■ ■ ’>?>■.' :3»;. •• fe'- r|r'''*^v*V; &'}i|gJ‘ T,-- '.i!r.Jit.-f 0^^r:' ■ ' SpH ■y-*. fe-^'‘•■p- "is C:;"*' V • ■5 r x » MINUTES OF THE CONTINUATION OF THE STUBBS BAY ASSESSMENT HEARING MINUTES Of me i-u COUNCIL ON HELD MAY 18, 1992 D*M«o said ha has a non-conformlns system, but It will o[)y r::d%%%V% V V"e\r' Saffron stated that would have to be a policy not the Council would allow updates to the current s p y to allow additional usage of that system. Jabbour felt that If the property doesn’t need sewer, the Issue should not be pushed. M^ii..icihHn. 180 t-eaf Streets asked ®®' Vw" hL^a'^targe^slrV:::; s:i5 s; be available to that property. omw Mtnkainna 3200 BavsIde RoacLs. felt that the quarterly service 5t;!!rSi"t5 rSi I dents not hooked up Is ridiculous. ^^^‘l‘-“^us?oe^^'’^^.*^%s^'d-« ^^:TJnr::incT '*ShT*would" S?if.?"th’e Cou“?? establish” deadline for hooKup when the system faiIs. Oaftron asked If properties using holding tanks would be required to hookup immediately. Jabbour said they should be required to hookup right away. Mayor Paterson agreed. Oaffron said the reason for suggesting that P'-®”'’.*'** f? Irea'tr* H;nra“si"nt?ac%*'-foru.Vd":^crd^o ^i;;r'lU-ivi" “m;rt,:5: company. Knight asked what date Is the deadline based upon. sutler Informed him that It Is taken from the date of..final completion of .the project. ,t -as moved by Mayor Varc.*l's* with ."•JImISS that upon completion of • parcels determined to have system shall to a creek or a non-conforming system al I other parcels arelake shall connect within 16 months, and all oiner pa 1 'f V( '4 «h / . .Vi C ..>,V-«^- E;n=-Mk.:-mek^MINUTES OF THE CONTINUATION OF THE STUBBS BAY ASSESSMENT HEARING ” held by THE ORONO COUNCIL ON gmvv HELD MAY 18, 1992 to connect to sewer within 00 months unless deemed to have * 7 _ _^_ __ _ _f_ _A,j»m e n&uf n im a■■Ar►a^^ ' ifel-v'' »>rr' k. X k'i m foliihfl system prior to that date. Ayes 5, nays 0. Mayor Peterson said she has a hard time agreeing with Condition #7. fe v-:. . ;* m Kushn said the charge Is a sewer availability charge which is equal to the quarterly billing^ which has been established by ordinance. Jabbour felt that amount should be established based on money needed for maintenance. km:k te' Barrett reviewed that the Council was only making policy decisions on the project and would eventually need to amend the ordinances. He stated the availability charge may have fiscal consequences If deleted. Bob Provo. 220 Cvonet Place, asked If the $50.00 septic Inspection fee would still be charged. If'Mayor Peterson clarified that It would not be charged to parcels connected. I!• Paterson asked how many years they would be paying on assessment. the •iSv Mayor Peterson explained the assessment Is set for 15 years at 6%, theMoorse explained that If the City gets a better interest rate, cost of the project could be reduced. Mayor Peterson called for a recess from 8:30 p.m. to 8:55 p.m. He stated they have determined the fair amount for the assessment K- fe' ■ IS based upon the wwSt of a new septic system. LI nd. Ml I tm.n InfornMd th. Council th«t th. B.d.rwood ■••<>“» to bo oxeludod from Mr. Knight's group, and th.y '*'*'*•'***“?• port of tho proj.et. Sh. .xpr.sssd xppr.clatlon for tha •fjjj"?*®" of tims for hookup. Sh« statad th. B.d.rwood r.sidents wish.d to retain their right to appeal. 8 - T*wm ■'.f *f-' ■ V-, . ■ . 4-' • 1 i A ii % 4 -2 ■4 V -'>in'^.r / -j-'.rTBTrr:' .1#; -•’**-••n*xf\ • ^»;->. ,fwmm %> i IeS:^S;iKali:'*ia-cs«- >fc=., r FRON: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Noorse# City Administrator July 21, 1S92 /J SUBJECT: Amendment to the City's Fee Schedule Concerning the Sewer Service Charge for Un-Connected Properties City currently has a sewer service charge for un-connected ‘v. r ‘.*^v’; •' ^properties which is paid by property owners during the period after the completion of a sewer project, but before they are hooked up to the system. This fee is the same quarterly fee paid those residents connected to the ^wer system. The general %eeer fee is based on both the costs of operating and maintaining 'Ithe system and the costs for treatment charged by the MWCC. A number of Stubbs Bay residents have requested the sewer service charge for un-connected properties exclude the portion of the Oharge related to the Nwee treatment fee since they are not adding treatment expense. lii "Tbe Council has directed staff to exclude the MWCC portion of the fee from the sewer service charge for un-connected property in the Stubbs Bay area, for a period of up to 5 years. This period i!®- ®»ay be shorter for residents whose septic system fails requiring |?:6i»l.l».ooKup to the sower systeis. ■-_C* .5 • • K w&m \\".. . . . . . . . . . ■ .-V LA : *4 .«•>: . •-w 5 .- ■1 > 4i?' /V T mBS •jf-. -. . . . . . . . . . .- ■Wb''' ORDINANCE NUMBER SECOND SERIES ii^^.f'tt; fc... . ■./>■ : ■ -vs*.-- i- 't-'r • ■■ V '%■ ■ • 'a&ms.'-'- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 99, SECOND SERIES ADOPTED NOVEMBER 25, 1991 ENTITLED ”1992 FEE SCHEDULE” mBi m’ ■'?■ The City Council of the City of Orono Ordinance No. 99, Second Series adopted November 25, entitled "An Ordinance Adopting the 1992 Fee Schedule” amended to read; ordains: 1991, and is hereby mM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES Utility Service Rates MUNICIPAL SEWER RATE «?" Sii’ Stubbs Bay Area Project - for those properties un connected between 16 months after service availability and up to 5 years after service availability and meeting the criteria set forth in Ordinance No. _ _, Second Series, allowing for hookup time extension, shall be ‘^'y- charged only for the City portion of the sewer unit rate and not for the MWCC portion of the sewer unit rate. mp 5, Stubbs Bay Area Un-Connected Properties $24.30 per qtr. Itdbpted by the Orono City Council this 27th day of July, 1992. - w/- ATTEST: Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor * MPt: ■ Porothy H. Hallin, City Clerk iff: .P®i: fiM.. ir ■ •?'■^--V " *3' mm* A' *W&' m' r*. ■ ■? srH,:' j ’ fM ■. * ...-i-- 'i-: w - mm ' •' '^ '^1 1 t. ■ •,/: ii A :,1 .a ■>T 1 "'.i ■i i VtJ J A' ,«-vj >• .. . ri.-r.J?: “T. ^ryr; “' -rnTn’-v—mt nwr •V • ^'rV ' ■.•‘;.':T'-'wmm^m^'' jC-*' fO: FSOH: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator July 21, 19i»2 %'^0/'L WM.: >? mm- •ct A. /^r-•. • V” '%-4 SUBJECTS Ordinance Amendment to Allow Partial Pre-Payment of Assessments fZMium- "V The current special assessment ordinance • llows pre-payment of ds^4 assessments only if the total assessment amount is pre-paid. A fc ttiimber of requests have been made concerning the City allowing :poxtion of the assessment to be pre-paid and the remainder to be levied as an assessment. An amendment allowing partial pre- 4.- ^ •. . n ------...-----------------tpaynients is attached for Council review and approval ^ i'4'-'■Kvf uiiKw V■. . ^ui.: .’i- 'm^m. m-: ^Wfe.> !i> • . ^• v;'» <•• • V - r • ■■■K ' ‘4 •4 4 *r ' PiSis':. liiftSii;f- 4'^ %ssSm '■ •■"wmm ......... _4^P-w,^ V,/( V 1 4l /■^ 1 1 '• ' 1 .•'<t 4 :■& 4x IP"ORDINANCE NO. ftpI#-' If ;:: ^ ■V AM ORDINANCE PERMITTING PARTIAL PRE-PAVMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR STUBBS BAY SEWER PROJECT NO. 13937 HHBRSASf the Orono City Council adoptod an Assossment Roll foe the Stubbs Bay Sanitary Sewer Project No. 13937 by Resolution No* 3121, dated May 18, 1992; and NHBRBAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.061, subdivision 3, allows partial pre-payment of special assessments prior to certifleation of the assessments with the County Auditor; and NHBRSA8, the Orono City Council desires to provide the V' owners of the properties assessed for the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project with the opportunity to partially pre-pay the assesaaents as approved by the City Council. worn, THEREFORE THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL DOES ORDAIN: Property owners listed on the Assessment Roll for Stubbs Bay Sanitary Sewer Project No. 13937 may partially pre-pay their assesament, prior to October 1, 1992, in the following manner: ** 1) Mo interest shall be charged for partial pre-payments made within thirty <30) days from the date of adoption of the aeaeaament. [fV 2) Partial pre-payments made after thirty (30) daya from the edoption date of the assessment and before October i, 1992, shall incur interest based upon the entire aaoesament through December 31, 1992. ADOPTED BY THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL THIS 1992. DAY OF ^9 ■ A.m::..Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: 'i. M. Hallin, City Clerk f- t mi li * '^1 \ rrir.-.. :,-— w-..vv7^r->-- -.v. <\i.: Sii- TOS PROH: DATS: Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator July 21, 1992 ^45®459 80BJBCT: City Hall and Public Works Buildings Application and Certificate of Payment No. 5 'tm--m¥r %iy- 18";-, . feiP'‘ my^’k ■ Attachment: Application and Certificate of Payment No. 5 Kraus-Anderson Construction Co. $21,853.18’ Steenburg-Watrud Const. Co. $27,000-00' Gephart Electric $22,311.00^ Molin Concrete $ 6,331.00' Gresser Concrete/Masonry $29,609.10 Allied Mechanical $12,347.00'^ p!i#' We have received from Project Construction manager John Davies approved application for payment of work at the city hall and public works locations as follows: •js^ 1-#ImM. -r /T •i i"jir »>*. ■" y"' - Kraus-Ander son Construction Co. - For construction management services for June, $7,44 3.00^ for site supervision and reimburseab1e expenses for June $3,739.80 after adjustment for rate correction in March and April; and for site supervision and reiroburseable expenses for May $10,670.38, after adjustment for rate correction in May. MM - Steenburg-Watrud Construction Co. - For Concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, and public works building brick veneer, $27,000.00 "if - Gephart Electric Company, Inc. - For electrical work at public works, $22,311.00 - Molin Concrete - For structural precast concrete at public works, $6,331.00 - Grosser Concrete/Masonry - For concrete block work at public works, $29,609.10 - Allied Mechanical Systems - For public works location $12,347.00 attachments are presented for your approval. •4 W0^- Requested Action: Council approval of Architect's Application and Certificate for Payment No. 5 as presented. :v#^l PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, to approve City Hall and Public Works Buildings Architect's Application and Certificate for Payment No. 5 as presented. Motion, _ ayes, _ nays. 1 .11 1.' i 1 ■i1 ’A 'i 4 ■j ilM. Wi!'- . ■> ^'•i 'I Kv ■■ W:' i".'m. '■ L.-' % . >• :tn V- p-' ■ h‘:-\ ;v:<. S' .»/■,<W'.: f^' % ■ r. • ?-. , -.-f •V*' h”- :«•■r- bfr.'. S3.':;. ;.;i. n. • •Blftlil I fllll® *!il‘ji • • ^ 5P5il-lf ro D o 0> o TJ Co ft) C </» - m 2 € > D CL O mo 3 cs o o S e Oo 3 i/i ca o 3 >3 O mo S 3 3 O D 3 O fUroro 3 D 3 3 z CO (Do O Oo ifi 3 3 tncn o 7 </k o i o rt o ^ c5^‘S tn a 5L CD CD O 9 P S o 2 3) z ®SL lU c COoc 5 3 3oc.m o If 2 o o O 3o S. O s: ® 3<o Ooz > 3o X ’ s o > mo “1 CO 3 m 3 a §§ H 3 z 8 m o -H 11 o • 3cr -A to ^ fSJ S % 5 2<o (S >■o“0 o §oz > o om 3 =j 3 O > m 3 3 3 > 3m I i-jv ■*l; r ’1 ,1 P PP '•i" •5-V '1‘ -] T ■ S' 4™^vf ',-^J IS'M ■'-■ '• *•« Pp SSj iM cP ■ T- ■« ‘■ vv r-^ ■•rr'i’-- J '.‘'■'r-■/.'•m !»...■ 0m:m t kraus -anderson construction company I ^.-'sT^trTO!^^ ■■ cos ?T!;-.C7:on u \NACt!;> Tnvnicf itP28495 e^' July 3, 1992 fe', City of Orono « ^ c P.O. Box 66. 1335 Brown Road S Crystal Bay, MN 55423 wc umM.': Attn: Mr. Tom Kuehn Finance Director Re:Orono Ciiy Hall K/A Project #4059 mm X V ,.i ■■- -V &P; ■|i; '0m- “■' %■ ■ .Jl-. |«fir Payment ;T; - ■ ■- This request for payment is for 1992 Hall, as per the contract for the month dMuneJ^ Citv Amount Due: S7.443.0_0 mm pi"'Am '*u:4 . mm' -''V h:0^- fc' ■ ■ 1 rm -Minneapolis Division ___ S25 South 8th Sti«t Phone:(612)332-7281 Equal Opportunity |mo<ovef wmm k ...r: J I i1 4 •1‘. i ' -"J i'- = l5f^"'- ■v-^ I KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCnON COMPANY I COSTS actors CQsSTS LCnOS M\SAC z>? <P1H4*>6--------------------------- 3 1992 CUy of Orono P.O. Box 66. 1335 Brown Road S. Crystal Bay, MN 55423 Attn: Mr. Tom Kuehn Finance Director Re: Orono Gty Hall K/A Project #4059 ^,w- •* '5^m r - :V’4C £-’ i'5 '.i BfniifT *=•"■• . fnr on cite suoervision and reimbursable expenses through June nauest for payment is for on-site supervision *nu ,qq, S* M c<Ltrucuon manager contract dated November 12. 1991. M- * rmlrrr f^nnerimendenl Doug Revard — —— Correct supt rate ^^561.5 hrs. @ S12. 7/h JiAliUX 160 hrs. @ S37.53/hr.<^S6.004.80 (7.001.91)‘r 0 Tom Nelson 4 hrs. @ S45.00/hr.180.00 ± ^ Rodriquez 9 hrs. @ S18.00/hr.162.00 /VMfA.. V.J j . ii.J r JHA, V'lJ.JMlif*' tTTI • ^0-<r l^^hofgr Ralph lendro III Ralph Jendro ® hrs. @ S34.77/hr. U hrs. @ S32.58/hr. 278.17 390.98 netinbttr*iMt{ f«pg"«gs Copying Postage Biffs K/A Equipment Renul Correa truck rental rate MQ Tom Nelson KSP Revard (petty cash) # UPS 3 7 Veit U.S. West ^'7:. QlUnottni Due This Inv<ri( m mmM oo!f n ^ 414.80 78.03 110.52 1.064.96 (580.00) 9.65 9.67 24.03 15.09 19.25 430.00 ]3^Jl6 12-4VX 201.53 ~ / (2 » 5 1 2.7 I «j -r MiMicapoH* Otvtiion 525 South Sth Stftei. Minneapolit. .MN 55404 Phone: (412) 332-7281 FA.X: I612) 332-S739 £qur I Oppoftunitv Emotover \\I ■3 .1. •V 0*e • i '4 200*= .n4 »i^a.oU'^y p 0*3 g 12*A/x 'iM 160-=. »993-2J ’ ). i ■ U-» KRAUS «'June S • 1992 QiyofOrono P.O. Bac 66,1SS5 Brown Road S. Cryital Biqr. MN 55423 Abu:Mr. Tom Kuehn Finance Director Orono Citjr Hall K/AP«^ecl#4059 Jt^fquest For Pavmgnl - fnr nivmrnr 11 ftrr supervision and reimbursable expenses through Majr^SS, Ertitti S9B ^Doug Revard gnntendcTU I'/: y.A ^afetY Tom Nelson ^6 160 hrs. ® S50.00/hr. iio 4 hrs. ® $45.00/hr. C, oof.SO 180.00 U^M^ggr Sei LazRodriquex 4 hrs.« $18.00/hr.72.00 yfaflBc Vie Soil•cumo 2 hn. S 528.85/hr.37.71 0-* m '' ‘i-l # ^itihurmbl^ Expenses Copying Postage Biffs Cellular One John Dawlos " V a Equipment Rental ___ler Davis ^Layeux . Romrd (petty cash)s>wi US. West 123.80 397.73 148.34 29&51 71.01 1.124.46 150.00 1E66 758.86 77J0 43aoo 2^ I '2 » 6 6 5 • t> 8 *■ 0*'JUJ*OU- r>»u j 4 • 8 j ♦ I vj » 6 YU • 5<J* jgiiiouoc Due This InvoiceJ: * > - - ■»■ 'f t - •a 1 'A • -i-' . V ■ ■ !r ■ ' ■ ., . ^ I';;-'’ ' \ ’ • ■’r. ;■ Minneapolis Division 325 South 8th Street Minneapolis. .mN 53 j04 Phone: (6121 332-7281 FAX: <6^52-8. j9 Equr I Ooooftunitv tmplovef arr:? '■‘"i r-’r V5 II' r- \ Sr 3* ^ ^ 3* 7 2 ^ si ^#8 rr Cl y-i I.t«» y si O 5?n sr I I “ ftii ^-Ipfi°A\ll S || 3 Jl’m ||5 i -n -,II|S O s?;;fi5o 5?i;s= M® 2 > ?9? 2 ^ s ^e:S 3. ■g §3 a-5 I A o. i m A —• <M « o •* J 2 5.5 < ^ n i#!l. sty's ?^5fl M 9 >r - 3:n?i s 9 ^ 7 n in \j%\D Oi W 5 3^5*z r* 2 2^ - JO •• JO ^ oS o ^ S a 2. ^ IS > O tn Z S> S o •1 w i^n 5 c H- ^ 3T « Si IQ □ □SDO 9 n > 9 5 9 n « o' 5 551. i 5 I 2j S’ % S I ■_ . '. ■\’Si iW-.>AFPLICATIM FOR PAYMENT :V; nojCCT KANE: OROSO PUBLIC NCRXS AltCBnca*S PROJECT KO: 1124.04 APPLICATION NO: rOUH ^ APPLICATION DATE: 6/23/52 PERIOD TO: 6/30/92 ft nSR * DCSCUPTIOI ox MD8X •W. * ft ft ft ft ftfttHtftMftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftft******** ft 1 ftpOOniKS i PIERS ftnod BURf OU0C ftlUXl uon CIAOE ft Hie- §!i-. Ip^Vr' rf'’ M:- 6«S'= * Pf: >^ ft ftm • it:* ft ft 2 3 4 5 i 7 I 9 10 II 12 13 II 15 16 17 II 19 20 21 22 n 24 25 U 27 a » n n n n u s u 37 n a ftSUI i T0PPM6 *C.O. 11 ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft •' ft ftHftftftftMftMftftMtftftftftft*********** ft ft TOTAL M ft*ftftftMftftftftft*ftftftftftftft*ftft>**ft«*«* ftftftftftftftft* «;ui ij^:n moE NDRX COKPLETED IftHftft************* PRE7I00S ft THIS APPl. ft APPl. 21275 36568 63661 53303 5596 •*«{^i*ft 167423 «**••••• •tftftft***t****ft***ftft*****ftftft KATERIALS PRESENTLY STORED 28275 ft 36588 ft 57662 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0 0 5999 23900 3000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft ftiMAiMttt******* 122525 ft 32899 «****•««* 0 **•••***• TOTAL ft I CCXPLETEOftCON? STOHEO ft TO DATE ft 28275 ftl.OO 35588 ftl.OO 63661 ftl.OO 23900 ftO.45 3000 ftO.54 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 0 ft ERR 3 ft ERR 0 ft ERR ft**«**ft****«M«Mt«*Mlft* 155424 ftO.63 •«*•#•*****•«•* »i««t**** BALLVCE TO FIXISB 0 0 0 29403 2556 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31999 •*«•«**•* *«****»«* RETAINAGE 2828 3659 6366 2390 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 15542 rc • ■*>’ livfe'i •J 1 1 EXTRA GRESSER CONCRETE/MASONRY 1771 Yankee Doodle Road • Eagan, Minnesota 55121 612-454-5976 • Fax 612-452-0057 ter'v N9 1566 MOriTHOP June 25. 1992__ liM JOB^ Job #92-08 PiihUf* Mnritfi Paeilitv To: Kraus Anderson construction 525 South Eighth St. Mpis., MN 55404 •ffi.-'A f iM- MAN CHANGES FROM BID SET T FINAL CONSTRUCTION PLANS. mm: m0^m r... 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Set & fill pipe bollards 6* block partitions 4* equipment pads 4* tr&nsforn»r pads Delete columns on east side TOTAL ADO: 39 ea x 75.00 ' 540 ea x 5.40 = 184 sf X 4.00 = 25 sf X 2.75 » 7 ea X150.00 =(-1,050.00) $ 5,596.00 2.925.00 2.916.00 736.00 69.00 ill:#'... .It'mm i. ■ mtsm \ 4i-''- n n'.J .i;‘M4 ■: 1 < 1 S-'m \ -V^ 'm' - ^'-' ■ •S -A.-felf^ .:V'.\■'i ■7jjk-’•V, . i-v .;* n !‘V -. ,■ J is-*:. . @Sv. - slS-- >- '• STEENBERG - WATRUD CONSTRUCTION INC. 10255 mVCR GROVE TRAIL inVER GROVE HEIGHTS. MH 55076 457-2291 invoice N9 I.1719- To: ritT of Or'MIO 3-:.■*■!/■te'- MIS Broun Road South. Re: Qrono Cl tv Hall/Public Works j%-U .Tr>h ilQ?-07 ___________________ rt^aral m.v. mm S5321 DATCt Juno 30» 1992 TCRMS: nrr lo days moe_L |yfS . Hi: i:pl' if #'V;,. ||feS•v^ ' HfiK- :»f:s*A Orlginial Contract Amount $342,500.00 Work Complete to Date Lets Previously Billed Total Due this Billing 30.000.00 .00 $30,000.00 rlf SPf' Ms,m i^t ®K • • m0 jv)H Z 6 .i«' JltlilMSlett sstt St blHid wntcM written iir^uirlcs are made within ten days. ^ A fBiAiTT aiAmeor i% rta «o«th may bc inroseo roa late rAYMcnr "III ,IIIFORTAI'IT s When isiidttinf please specify which Invoices are to be crediteo. . • -■ --.---^v if-: ■ V .:i % ■j 1 M J ’f w1I •;im >3 1 1 u r«>r ^ ■ ts. fV*': 1.1 1^: i;-." '!■ ■-■■ ■imw' _V,_^ : Ps? Ji: . fe= mm «•• •*s 2 s r= ^a 1 fillsrsHlsrgHln ?|if? > no ^5 Sg" M 2 2 2 5 5 rn iisS|3 5 i s 2 3 O;o cnv: rtm 9o ns - 5?3 Sns 2 ^ =s||!?n r S rr - S* ta o ^ ■ Jf f s § S 5 |- zS^ 5-2 H as £ § ^ ^ «• O o ^ t# SL «• •• 3 »^ - o oCL ^ C 32 C KJto rt O VO to d 0)o d noz ?o >n O ?o C/) > n > oz o 5 2m Z ;«» ro —> n z O O « 2 5 « Q n > e -3 3 "S. ae !1 S. o ^3 » •»sS* > o ^ *a ® 1 I? 3 •* SI w> n u» > O O' ►- Z®ir » 3 » >1^0* n ^ i-l cr 3 fa oS S' ^ d P d CO ►- rt O 3 • 9 O ^ O d* CS CO p d X d rt » O rt O O' P P B »-^ d p p ^ 2 o d ri - X n 2*5 t-o 5 U» H- w rr 5uih: '-^ ^ !T c 2 ►- 5°g5o 70 3z tD o ^ t1 ttt ?□ o ^ « o D >1 O S3 do o pa w tn O U1 c ui rt to d" u» nS-o S «A CT p 2L 7 9 o o n O d d f9n C d o n 2«ri 3Z Cn Ui U>u*o 3 to N' d d Q P to P ^ Z O n* Do p K 3 p d < > > n r- O H- tn CO ^ o o 3 O Z da m d: n o •*ocn O S H. LP to Ln rr iP M O O h-- Q rr r?i ►-• 10 rr O ►1 O ft M *<?r tn 3 p o H- C H- H- \ h- *oa o H* I-* d iQ O tn P da p da > p p G O noz 3 > 5 » O n >•' n > Oz >zo nm 70 n > •o o 3 c M 5 CT O S »-* 3 K I m ^ n 5 oo o > 2 Q O «A n 25 5z u>o o VO to • «o X 2 3m Z =i^ oonc 5 s■« S I i ! 8 •O *A -i; * - *• ■ # • ft: &> -t «v r*. t ■ S.:‘. , ■ \- WWm IW ■■-k- .. sr- ui w 8 8 8 M Ul f» ym 8 8 : a)‘•i^’ •s/l* Ih« OO OD Ui KjJ K> P? »« »Q 98 rfn •ti ItnHi ofm P0 poc» «» Hi Hin n H* 1^ 08 00 • • 9^ ro •O TJ ft (0 cr» CH 10 10 0 0 ft rr • • fO (0 9 9 rt rr • * SC s rr rr 00 00 • • S 9S H» rr 00 OQ • • »T> *TJ H* !-• 09 00 • • •O rX> M H-» 00 00 • • rt D 8°W W «p •©o a ft ft *0 fO tos ££M M 0 0 C C H*.H^ •O *P B B fo <0 0 0 ft ft po POo o M (il lO .oc e ?0 90 o o e c 00 00 rt w •o «o c e n 0 0 0 O 0 0 rf rr I t H» 0^ 0 0 •C *o ao ao o o e c 00 00 0 0 0 0 ft ft I I r^ H- 0 0 ft h-» ft 0 0> H 88?r 8.8 8f 88rr n as rr H r* acm 0 o • H r» ae 0 0rr H r* 3t 0 0 cr rr o • n 0 0 0* fto • H om I/In Oz o M «» ui ^U> Kl ^ M I— u»u» \a r- ui B! 8 9^ 8 8 O Ul KOo% • • 88 K» U» 0^ OH O O • • o o o o as so as as Ul 0* • •o o o o 0» Ui I— ro €ys fo • • o o as UI so r- 0* UI • • o o *0 o as as UI 00 K> ^ • •o o o o UI o • • o o o o u« ^ UI »-• 0^ ^ • • o o o o UI •oo t « 00 Kl r- 8 8 O O o o •— 00 00 as • • o o o o *uo 00• oo UI r—UI UI UI Ch o o> • •o o o o fsj K' 0- UI UI ^• • o o o o i/In II ^ ps *0-Si ''05 i/I i/I •9 10 5 Q nO -3 ozssi g22|i czcg^ -<l/l L W" ■■M..Jsfc M v:. 9 M t- 01 S§ UI ^ UI CK ^ 0» 0% A JA ^ 0 w m Kl UI as 0 UI UI• • Kl 0 00• in ?^s|s i2S2^r\t 8 8 8 88 •88 0 0 *' 5°w •100100UI ^ ►- (O CD 0 500 8 m ^0^ 01 UI K> €K K> ^ i— •0 a0 0 M u* «o UI r- UI Kl t 9 • • e 10 • • M U> 00 ^o% to ot » UI A A 00 00 ao a*CK 10 0^ UI 0 0 €ti CK UI 00 Kl 0 4 00 0 UI r%”ii X > •'„ H* Kl Os 0»S8 o« Ot A 0 M0 0 p • t- 0 • •■2|a ’ • 8 • 0 88 • • 88 0 # 88 0 0 88 V w 88 w • 88 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • ••■'•V ”w- >!, Z?;rm 1 w 3 fj* ^ VI O t" 7 S $> 2 rt o o« •• €fs OS Kl s M ? I IT 5^: k l^P' V • rfov mpr^:- :«:<,i';:.'4^ r,. - ... 'A -,rj lfy€. . p >.>yy: f; %:■ 't:^ V-?- -v .-i •,■!:•' '■* * ■■ ‘■^ ^ 'i '1^ ,t'. •■ ’ y,>j'4^-?".>,vv 1.^. 1,, to cn ro •H >cn n I X » o 5 > r >o m X 1-4 X m Z c C TJ cn > n z »H r*M <n -I H o m Z rn X-c X H >« i-i o O cn m r n c C r a o >m -<n X r H o o C0 o z z 3 X H4 —4 O > M r a X - -4 #cn r >>m m -4 o X X ►H o m -4 Z M z > c • •■Ti r o o M ■ ••X > n Z rn « ••^ o «t • •• Xm r > • ••X m • •• a oZ X ■ • ■f -4X >-4 • ••Om -4 • t •Xc- m ■ ■c • t z o m »-» t H ■ ■•O •< NO ■ •«X > • •c r A A o A r i w V c 0^ • •o X ■ •c ro o o o • • o o o o <0o ff oo tjvV i\k ' fi s o a fTlz > m 8 U> -ic « HX < §n -0r-m >Mm cn m Z O H 51 ?5 |i S^i2o -- > oo ism r n 2 cn X 1-^ to S3z: cn > z c m 01 in g >u oz o cn Cl c T3 m > o •-• z r n 55 ►-I X n 03 -4 3JX cn X o z cn z -I 5? n rn o n z -i 3 C •-« o M •0 >r L-j L -J I Ozm oi 5 cn « s,i^ P- $ c > §;i -n Z m ui s ^ 2 O oi-> fV>ro ji» m"« o'® » m 9scn Zm <A>oo > <cn 0 1ro K) Ioro CJ <0 t: r:X X > > NO COn cnu >z "X omXcn o fjo z n oz 0 9^ 1roro •oro CO '1 J < > f .'T.' ---------^*•^1'^ ' ' ■ ^■] . E.'^'?\'i.fc', !y ■ 'f:fOi rv *•■ *. ife PROM: Ifit'v DRTB^ §?i-v::8objbct: Ron Moorser City Administrator ^ John R- Gerhardson,- Public Works Director July 22, 1992 ‘N. „ ^<L »r- • *r-t- ^■- . » v“i . ;^ m ' Subrecipient Agreements 6 Resolution Year XVIll Community Development Block Grant Program liJifJSfhe City of Orono has participated in the Community Development Block ^ Sl^^'Ornnt Program for several years. V. •' jglSocated. This year the City of Orono will receive $25,736.00 and has conducted a public hearing to receive citizen input as to where the money was JUiother requirement of receiving the funds is to enter into an agreement with Hennepin County Planning and Development and to approve 4 ' a resolution authorising the Mayor and City Administrator to sign the .^ttbrecipient agreement. 1 reeosBMnd approval of Resolution f -kS-.V , 7- f. r - - V. sijfiS^W t.iaaj0 'V„; ^'.V. ... . • 1. M1 i .'■i m m ' ■4 ¥ '5'^ I «:?;■ASr ; .N * .•■V rbsolutiom authorizing mayor and c^ty administrator TO EXECUTE SOBRECIPIBNT AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR THE URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City of Orono has executed a Joint Cooperation Aareement with Hennepin County for the purpose of participating ... _ _ _ _ _ __ A « 4 _ __ ^^ - ^ A ^ mm wm^rn. 1 A ^ e* R 1 IF191•92 (Year XVIII) Urban Hennepin County Community Development biock Orant Program and ^ • WHEREAS* Hennepin County is the recipient of an annual grant from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for purposes of the program and the City is a subrecipient under the program and rec ;lves a share of the grant; and WHEREAS* program regulations require that the Cityvs aaciavdaa w f «*• - - — — ^ - a ^ 4 #Coiuity execute a Subrecipient Agreement which sets forth the specific ImipleBientation processes for activities to be undertaken with program ’'funds.P‘ BE IT RESOLVED* that the Orono City Council hereby authorises and directs the Mayor and City Administrator to execyite Subrecipient Agreement* County Contract Number A09692, on behalf of the City. Adopted by the Council this 27th day of July* 1992. W'-W0:^. n0‘>0/-Barbara A. Peterson* Mayor mf tz- Attest t V.-«"m-|>p:'' fSls-a Dorothy M. Hallin* City Clerk m ms rV':-:r . m 1 ®??E''C.?:?-.v^-f ,iIP...^'v<^ ■ ■0^- ■ %n ^.. TO: FROH: DATS: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator July 24, 1992 ^ % liP-\^o.mV SUBJECT: Fall Newsletter ='’?>. -.i.. mi' The city began a newsletter in the Spring of this year. The newsletter was to be published on an annual basis. In looking ahead to the Fall and in thinking about the budget process and the Truth In Taxation hearing, it would be helpful if the city provided information to city residents to clarify the Truth In pSi Taxation notices and to provide a brief overview of the proposed itr 103 budget. This could be done as a one page flyer or as part of a larger newsletter. This item is being brought to the Council's attention at this time because of a request from the Cable Commission to include their Fall newsletter in any mailings that we might have that reach all city residents. if"# ■ '■ Three issues to be addressed regarding a follows: Fall newsletter are as -1. 2. Should the city have a Fall newsletter. Should the Cable Commission newsletter be included with the city's newsletter. 3. P:, if" If the inclusion of the Cable newsletter with the city's newsletter results in increased costs, should those costs be paid by the Cable Commission? Mmli tf;■mi ■■■ . , ■ ' ■ -v’ % 1 i1 ,4 i 1 .. . . . . . . . ..4i ■li:P'l;|:“ 0(. . ■ Wi'-mk' TO: FRON: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator July 23, 1992 (A ft.yc>i OfO:* f 80BJBCT: Resolution Amending Designated Signatures for POST Disbursement Money *■ ••!' m M The attached resolution updates the existing resolution designating signatures for the Minnesota Board of Peace Officer Standards and Training disbursement money to reflect the current Police Chief and City Administrator. The application for the disbursement money can not be completed until the resolution is adopted. ■ RSi-r ■iA .. li m m.pK'k-a% wm3?Si|fcM$kM .y. ■<r* m .7- pp« ■ Mi * tA* *'1. mii I I •*r, 1^4. ■ ^ i.~\r- >m'M h RBSOLQTION DESIGNATING SIGNATORBS FOR THE MINNESOTA BOARD OP PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING DISBURSEMENT MONEY P-WHEREAS, on July 1, 1982, the State of Minnesota began collecting money as a surcharge on all moving traffic offenses; and p- - . : WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 626.86 provides these funds ae ceimbursement to cities for some of the co.* cs of their peace office*'*s continuing education; and I#-'WHEREAS, two persons are required to sign the ication forms on behalf of the local units of government; and tea. : WHEREAS, the requirement for signatures are to be the chief law enforcement officer of the agency and another officer of the governing body; and WHEREAS, Stephen X. Sullivan became the new Police Chief on August 19, 1991, replacing Melvin H. Kilbo; and ,.v' WHEREAS, Ronald J. Moorse became the new Orono City on September 9, 1991, replacing Mark E. ' Hernhardson • HOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Chief of Police ___^ X, Sullivan and Ronald J. Moorse, Orono City Administrator, be authorized to sign the application forms for che reimbursement money provided by the POST Board. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono Minnesota at a regular meeting held July 27, 1992. Barbara A.Peterson, Mayor V’i". 'V- 'i*;- •ftci'.'t t??' i*:; 'J: tierothy M, Hallin, City Clerk i i "D ^1# if' V yyiMi-nPj ’ -S, .‘ V^0' Wi^:' I ' tr" i:P. if ^ ‘ ^ P^?sfc f ■ ; - fi to.;<-: ■ ■ Wh ’-i i-'.%- 4. ^ ■ ' * ' Kic^^ Sifm .... • Ef#il" ::V l»S’:v '•>. ii»P';. TO: PBON: OBTB: HayoE and City Council Ron Hoorse, City Administrator July 21, 1992 </> SUBJECT: Public Information Meeting concerning Leaf Street Reconstruction to MSA Standards Staff has recommended that in conjunction with the Stubbs Bay sewer project Leaf Street be reconstructed to MSA standards. This enables the street reconstruction to be funded through MSA funds. The residents of Leaf Street have raised objections concerning the impact of widening the roadway to meet MSA standards. Staff has now completed an analysis of the impacts of i^^const ructing Leaf Street to MSA standards. Council has indicated that prior to Council action on this issue a public information meeting would be held to solicit resident input. The Council may at this time establish the date and time for a public information meeting concerning the reconstruction of Leaf Street to MSA standards. is^ '.1 ;^:v^ 'll 'i -i J > . ^1.. A • .I ■ ->r'pititejO'':VU’/i c^d> •• 'I iv; PP:^-S%A,-= > ssMIv i".M'm%. TO: TROH: DATS: 80BJ1CT Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator July 21, 1992 Joint Meeting With Planning Commission %o . R'#n •?»■,... The Council has indicated it will meet with the Planning Commission in a joint work session to review and discuss issues related to the Ice Arena proposal on the school district property* At this time the Council may want to select several • ^^•i;nate meeting dates that can be provided to the Planning Commission. HI*':-. isiw . tm ^ fefc1», .......... '.'.V' ■' KSUP' pap''-’’ l#®»v JKS' -y^... im mi MM - m ■ ■ ■■ mm pftr V- mm ■ •.M' ' \^s® 1 4 i .1 L ^ * ' I • ^i|sA<‘*' ’C^/tef. ■--<.- -fe-'*' Ssa.r^^0(^ fci.^"' TO: FBOH: DATS: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator July 21, 1992 '•»f«JUi ri. '^Ot '*• S SUBJECT: Council Participation in Corn Days Parade -:.vP; 40- Th« City has received a request for information concerning City participation in the Corn Days parade- The City is requested to indicate the number of units it plans to have in the parade. In the past City CounciImembers have ridden in the parade. The Council needs to determine whether to continue their participation in the parade and how many units are needed. ■Sm .; - w ■ms--r*l» sii# * }SSS^->y A _ _ Witi .. ,^.‘ £-i> ■1 Mi 1 ■■;-i •■;. M '4 % ■)FI t 'M ^7^ .*- ■;l 7^. ,1 - C-- " <*vw'iif W "mC^//)m ■\: -m^'/r-A:ii^ A p,^»:i.v,‘ . fci>' 8 s5»J' •■■iv “- iff. ■'; V;r-. ' -v .rC":Mm. Ron Moorsor City Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director July 22, 1992 Temporary Employment Orono Golf Course ml ^4te Due to the amount of moisture this year, there has been the need for more frequent turf maintenance at the golf course. In order to maintain the same quality of the golf course, it is necessary to employ additional personnel. It is recommended to employ Robert Dressel, Jr. as a temporary grounds helper at an hourly rate of $5.00 effective July 28, 1992. /■mdu. ' The total additional cost of $640.00 will not exceed the budgeted Sttount. >5>v- ■ Af'Vf iii: ■■ ■ feM-vn Mm-"-'msm KW. ; te'- mm^. f ■ •>i1I |iSi , ■ #ir ^ 'v$-m si iiI' tl* m V . .- ..•fc _ %%P«:01^* s :\ -e-' •fi?5 .-'i*-**y ■■''-*■. i ' fe.|«v . ■ ::^' /’v:,v. ^ «4: -.v.-it:-*-.1 '#!if'. ttPy"’ [:VA;'>T' «f.;- sj-;,“;r f . r?f'f ^i;--j'..'il!:-'. W? I- W«-: <\- ‘ r; /■; ,v'> ••»*•: X. *.■-'V,-i'%>;%* LIST 07 LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APP^^J^ ^ FOR HEETING OF July 21, 1992 %O Septic System Installer License Barfkecht Excavating ,9201 County Road 26 Annual Home Occupation License Renewal Heliotrope Garden Design 4625 West Branch Road One Day Set Up Permit -Smith College Club Minnetonka Center for .the Arts 2240 North Shore Drive September 12, 1992 9^5 p.m. Limited Leghold Trap Permit <• Richard Hassel DtiR Permit Expires 8/8/92 870 Hunt Farm Road or 20 beaver Trapper A1 Larson Fifteen traps V % •:w t3 ■'7 4 i ■N ■ y.,rl .. .^i ^'<1 •, m ’.73 kiiigi'imdJL, : V*»' • ijITYof OKONO (612) 473-7357 Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay# MN 55323 SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERS LICENSE APPLICATION All questions must be answered. License fee, bond, certificate of Insurance, and evidence of MPCA Certification must be attached. All applications are subject to a ten (10) day approval period. Business or trade name E>cl ^ f hyt r-a /r ✓<> -// Business address Ac' P/iCL / >7 Business phone 3>^Residence phone i'yf ^ 2.- ■■■4 Name of applicant or company representative holding MPCA certification ph )/;p Type of certification held* Installer Certificate expiration date ^3____ Pumper Have you ever Jield a Septic System Inrtaller license in Orono before?Most recent year Have you ever had a license revo)ced7 Where?Mk When? Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yes X Do you pump out septic tanks? Yes _ _ _ _ No No X cm cF Df<m -mrrtCt^FICE ||v 8PBMZTTAL8 RBQOIRED: 1. P If 1-' 'pJr f ^ * t •^3. 4. misooooo Ot C£H 50.00 650.00 License application fee. 62000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Orontf^Hf obligee. The state Plumbers Bond will not be acceptewt-^ T0A:3t. 650-100-300,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance. 05/20/92 Copy of current MPCA Certificate. £5^, f.' ■. LZCBWB8 HILL MOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITOIS ARB SUBMITTED h' I ^‘-^Liet persons other than applicant who are authorized by you to apply for permits under your license datctyp* U)i^k 3.Fro¥r\_______________ The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of Orono, ' # Minnesota, for a license to install and repair septic systems. «»d/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws of the State of ^ Minnesota and the Ordinances of the City of Orono. jNlte /y— Applicant's Signaturercmiff:iMLT Staff recommendation Approval Imaaon for denials _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ City Council Action Date __ _ _ Date license mailed Denial Date Approved Denied f MU __. f. ■I 4 ■X' y: if*. ■-iolfl cctv0c:leWSBR^V 0-w^- 'is.?. ■ 1 rb2x T«i"“l335 SO Brown Ra “ Date License ’Approe a»^"ho«b occtfatioh ^.‘^■r &"■ I :- ■ KAMEs ADDRSi w^voftjfeHyw5t!/AV^i jSkmR^c PEONE: ciry: *"’• ®pr^a?l“t*'of*^Smls“SiSpioyer8 on back of this epplication. lype o£ Business to be Operated:__C C\r(\tr\ i iSflfi<*Tfsn<yiCS _ * ^ • m a. J ^ i W fiWjt X X hji.' 3 -ti'. vf,-v;v i V. V; IItm Lie«». -ay be re-ok|d ‘ an“"JJ:^f ^SSiaiSTd*."! “i^^’»SJwJSi “cS S^p. »..»■ »«• ■•*;• ■‘•grs; STreanired by City .ta££, tb. review t^ew^ be boein... _d-ye. tb. lic«~ p'l' SSiSS- bS-or.*Se^^“l S*^be ne« re^larly scheduled -eeting hel OD thm mmamd and fourth Monday of each nontlu •) ;<•NO MDNZCXPAL CODS RBGOIATIOHS OH HOME OCCDPATIOHS PDRSOAIIT TO SECTION 10-20, SOBDiVISION 4 (C) » K;j^v:: Prohibited Bone Occupation Practices- 1.It is unlawful for any business operating as a hone occcpap^p Engage ?n operation wi‘icu-. proper licenses. 2. -%■ '■ my 3. ni^' f- m 4. All persons engaged in the business must reside in the_a^lJ5i^« No commercial signs permitted other than signs residential zone. 0:>r0ii> -: 1' ^a.?:- 3. *• No excessive stock in trade nay be stored .on the premises. Over the counter retail sales is not allowed. Entrance to the home occupation must be gained from within the i? A i 't-^e undersigned hereby agrees to the conditions quoted above frOT the Oronc Municipal Coda and any additiiqnal conditions the City nay reguir • N;; p'" I ■ '■ . ■ Slgaature of Applicant:Date V4-- 70m eXTX USB ONLTs After vp-i: t-.-'i'’.. following: Approval of Signature of Zoning Official: .cansa fct.?*,Signature of Pire Inspector: polication, staff recommends the Denial of License Date: ..'S ■■■ yw:d WMmd i •■■ m-rt Z* *, * ^*‘* .> j.TggCKG OF ZMPLOYZBSs ICIME;NAHE bk ____j. 2.^ni TauPt^S^t AApl<jA/^M 21?; 5S4dfe ADDRESS: 21?: Lsr«•* ■» . %V bats op BIRTH:,195U DATS OP BIRTH: KANBt At\nJkv\^NAME: <! 1 ITORSSS : SQl2-*nAX<.d^ Bl vd ADDRESS: ^^CITY:m f DATS OP BIRTH:ifl/izM ZTg; FSMA' CITY:A* • DATE OP BIRTH: |g.,.KAME*0^'-w. licU-j vMj Si,m fpMV' ■ t ,'LX' • .—.,. <=;?.( £ix<t.P/ukSfr^t rTW. \l\ffly2itfa MiM---- 22?: ^533 1 NAME ADDRESS: mv .'•TO . «tf MB a» • BASS OP «Tft?g 2 ill IS / 5^DATE 0? BIRTH: •V ■•« • » W • • •' ADDRESS: dW:___21?: ADDRESS: CITY:_ _ ZIP: DATS OF BIRTH:DATS OP BIRTH: 1 l,i I . s-C^i^Ou • rv.'. ■ m§ imI If .......ailimt a i- li i ■ t'liimiitriJiiih i >iiiiiiiirfBril -aVj ..n. . . 4^'1 M i ■i '1 1 I II ‘■$ ‘i M;. ■• ■ . » K.' - fe' irv '^.7 teIr 1:> |r"m i-W' ri^is-Imfe bW r^>*' •• I „ ‘ ■ V- %■ is;»>*’v !' fe"' ii-l'.-'S:; 1^^' mf: ■ ft? ti-Ai-' I#S?. rilONC 012 2900159 M'‘^h ■■ i?. ; ■>•■■ MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY SMITH DAY IN L!OUOn CONTROL DIVISION EVENT: THE COUNTRY 333 SI0LCY . ST.PAUL.MNS5I01 ^^^2/92 TIME: 9-5 pm APPLICATION FOR CONSUMPTION AND DISPLAY (SET UP) PERMIT ONE DAY PERMIT FEE SlWW S25.00 I... •r NAMf AND AOOnCSS SIWJWM AHE Nor COfiniCT. liAKi CHAftCtS IN sfacismlow. CI7T OF mvo fr/ms OFFICE JJIIIOOOOC Oi CEV 25\00 CHECK. 71 rslw REam-ntm m MOTE: ALL CLUB ‘ON-SALE’ IMTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSEE S ARE EXEMPT FROMKPPl'flllib/^^,%;5 Sni.th..Co 1Xege.jCX.vk.of Minn^ota —M A«M«#9%H* Sm* fiwijpr •’•••-*•- • r*«4* n*tt«« m UO#% Smith Day in tb« Country e^OulLBuIa .Vasely^ ,210 W« PFAPt, St., _#326 _____ Nlnn«apolis m-----pmwrr l)|*^Naf« ctMii CJawbuc 5«t9iM*< 9» •# CImA AA4 Lomnif flu«ip«eit ^fwB Hennepin II -- 5iaie 1*9 CM MN 55403 Non-jrcflt educational organization •f Jt IMMf.N notonka Center for the Arts Wv»» •1 M|N iMimiNai.|{« Ilf NfwAi. n I MAflAf I «i:i *•• Mania*! See above AMiett »• 2240 North Shore Dr, Uayzata, HN SS391 »'Atiiii A t4(»p4 iMIWiu aaal J Li^jOu^rtictNit ocm mote TO iMif iiu'^iNtSS run tMif locamo «4t r-, J; ijvti if~<iiAN%r in. I uMMiM LiciNSits ^lAMC ANUTutTf^ni i AA6I ^A4| /OlffMe f on A ruQlIC OUSIMCSS: M i Pa»|Af<9Hlti, liiif tlt» Ntwf ae<d AUii.m nt |ach ra*tw€t: M a Cott9o*atiof». Stair ih # Ntn» imi AiMifii ol Ik H Qlllcft. H AMHitt/UINM* A#«t«n Adfitett A««*e99 1m»# UisII mtisitf PAawaBwt •! Mfa*i»f»|Areyasm •• (hses MfmlaMS»H« llMwlae«e«aa9a 1930*s 125-470 125 Graduate of Smith College, Northampton, 1 IM iMtaltant NATcaniftainfisinsrviSMsr' ’»««•*« !w Menlift* iSISUtili na. Priitdent Llii Patlin, Treasurer tih* i*Mt Kacllo Symons. Vice President K5#ta«s r«M MetMMrse l« ti*we I »*wns»i;i On * A510 Fremont Av. S«, Mpls, MN 55409 2816 Clenhurst. Mpls. MM 55416 A*«.(U 4704 Aldrich Av. S., Mpls, MN 55409 Mm aii|iMcant:il|Mflnefihip. any psrlntc if coiiMHailon. any olliccr or director: II dub. any dub oMIctr or dirtetor. ever ' I liadailcartwunrbi! the MbmeMta Linuor Conuol Act revoked or tuttieridcd or bee** cuMvicted lor any violaiion ol Slate ' Law* or local ortXnanctf: II m. five data ar>d detail* Not to our knovledee I iMefNt tfvtslv lAai gkf M«t •! «sv Mas 6"««Ni|«P ism«P91I*M iMI 9* tfhlt m«ti Hsn is, l»iivt « flvt Mtl •f iNstpt*^ ANYflNMir IttUflllltniUNUinoOfMDf AilOff fill lAilOf INIOAICAIIIIO tIOUOa. NOCONSIUIRATION WILL If GIVIM TO THIS ArPliCAIIUH UNtllS APfllOVie AS pnoviuio Sltow ir iiif tusiNtssisiocATiuitiAcouniv TESJESSmSST If A»f — Mf pteseMifMva Hai# If 1111 lUSINISS IS tOCAtiO IN A AtUNiCIPAi 11 v y»<t p'j M«Wtl*l Psi/^J. Ve*ly. 1992 Co-Chsir j ■'Om6/ •r A cLurArTAcii a copv op tmi constitution ano nVLAWS OP TIIC CLUS AND A CUNflENT LIST OP MEMBCns Bylaws submitted 1991. Roster unavailable. CASH CHECK *■ ^« % APPLICATIOHLIMITED LEGHOLD TRAP PERMIT 3/^ V-‘.pf: '% 7* ., V., ~ li4 DATE: Kune: Address: 5 2M- . 19^v \ Application Number: QaP Location of Trapllnc: • ri.- t r.»Period of time needed for permit:_ _ _^ 'Purpose ( Include %#ritten statement of hardship) B' (\aj uj2t XJU^X>tsi|^ y owners led of ippllcation: i Sgrie ?ratl5rby allele able Federal. State, and y liOcal Laws including ordinance 232* Signature cant $20.00 Fee pai;U Date; Jlii^:2>Y_1 9tZ. OMMENDED: Ye s Check Caah ■fe&f;.-: -p&Ihltialm '3^'. 1? Sa^y yL qlutl^ Ev Director APPRO'/ED :Yes No m N City Administrator Certified Hat of property owners within 500 feet ®“"b« obtained from the Hennepin Coun-/ Property & Description Orfic . m-WiY oe ODtaxnea xrom cut? ncmxc^j.*. v.wv«.wj .. A«603 County Government Center, downtown hinneapoiis. Li r V!fi J -d >•' i i 1 •1 .'■‘r •T| 'I /,N 1 1 d..tA '-r.;firlifM!:^K,, u JC • • rh ' <; • ■■■ ;-(»«Jr ;',. '.. . I*. ■^' ■mmy* ■'• p. pirn" i#^v'*^ "ii;' V"v - : r h: -ir.:V WM c ■ ' :-;'-::.*4^-" m'-mm:. • .. ■ f\ • ---------k-.^ 1.. . .L, ^ • Ni ^ : f- .- ^ *^ 35 : c ^ 'i M s -O \ s $ JL 90 90 s cm 90 90 O3 3 90 o 3 90m 2 S 5 n Itn s. 7 ? . « L^! slo •• — in & Ok ?2. ® g I•• y oo • •• ■•. Vi■i 3 i 1 i 1 1 1 1 ■A §0:.. k. M •' f’®' 3V .■ ■ .1 ‘ t V4jrT • • # »W ■ i^vi-':Pu-"'vA- . • [|/^7v2t'-.■• '■''. : ■■■■. J.l: i#l' ^■•••‘- -.-V . ■ C//y _ oom^'»«o«i^e»M*4 2^ WOMOOMOIOi m 2fOMM«m*wuo Z W**>«kM«MOO 2 mm WI»«»»0»U*<k Oft# •8^ ^e { PI • MX-m-iXP1 • MX-4M >air--<piO< X(/i»*40l^OZ> * ’ 8? •* -^►4 Pi>r*></ipixi/i a»>;oH ^O f“xCxpi PI CPI39Z 20 2 m O 2 C4 m X •n oj^^uoitjtjcj -n uicnrsioi^^^^^ *4 UIOIiJ«iMWKIt» #kOI«iUI«^liJMW •»(/!« OOtMOOIUlewK> I ►^OI»^0«OIDU1 I « m « I ■ OI I ■ o • • • I ■ «o • Q^mhs ■ t ■ ui • OUI«UI*«4IPID^« 8' |>••••••• ■^I I • 0» I 0«»«»«i^«ilDM • ■ I_________________ o M 8 8S •n M H l/l M H Mo 20 HIM 0232 <-4C/l ss o -I 2 li AikdMh •s .uUi. • .V.i* M O 1 , ;;, •'. w.-'V kff'-'v-%- Ul .-T ■ feitN: * lf=. '-■ ‘ ■■ yis ■•" ■■'> . i.’l? ^"i'i. h'(r£\^,'0^'-^ fe">. m ii-'p-- ;V-;;v^h- iv::^-: M!!:'?fe?,tm ijk.,l t- V ; ^i)"'Ssjr p%. ■4v'ift' i‘- ’ ■'v'.V itf- K'ffiS;- IS*.m, fi- '-'* -‘> ^pi'. ^ ■ ■‘•^ -si » • » ' iSf -r V -r^^v ^'%::.a®'*' iisiifc-:.SM oo mm Ofa lor£o?.l5S8ii>i-* *•***•*■ **•" SrapmO* 5>8 -*8®®- n»r* _«. ... - _i - =—.C*^**^*< »"r-a!ac«»*4Q>*>-«i^-<^O 0«-t •?tst»n*XO_-«i’* _ K xr*i z 3D m m«-«o_0 Xf-z »<o> H 13**-fn m tD ^ ID ID 19 ^ WID M to iJ iJ ^ O MW |i* CJ W lil 0 01 tJ ^ CJ ^ M iJ CJ iJ Ul Ul ^ CJ W W OlJii ^ M CJ <il mm MMMKIMM mu m mum M *- MMM UMMMMMM MMM M MM UM MMMlMM^MM9iMMO 0»M JbUMUMMMOt^«i<DMOM^9IMViOMOIUlUMUIMU UOU AO€K^OIUOIOUID0IM*^|09M>4UMMOIUIIII^UMDUO J^MOti^lDMUI'^Ui ^ ^ Olil*«tlD8s$s£ssssss8sssssssss:3s:s:t:s:ss:s£s!::s:isss:::!:sso-< U-luo MM M MM M ►-MM mmMmMMM MM MO OUOa»OMMMUVOMMM'MMlOUMVnM0I^^PSJNICJMp»JtoK»aiUI^UlNiaiM«ht/lii«eaM4OOI U M M O M o U ui M OI10 91U O m M10 o M U «i 9» OI •• «• u **4 U o VI «i U OI ^ M 91M «i «>4 M M 010 o 01 «i M IOUMUI0MOkOi«tUOlOi«ltO«tOUI«»MIOU«PVIMOI«><OUlMMUlM«OMOMO^UIDO«OO»MO»*^M • ■•••••••••••••«•■■•••••<■••■••••••••(• •••••••• MMQOiMOIOUO«»MO»OMOOiOM/IMOOOOIOOlMM'^010IOM<i»OiMMUI^OObOlllOIOUIM MMOMOQl>*M^O*IOVIOOO»OIOMM<0OVIOOOO'M«M^OKlUVIOOiVIO^«iMOMUOMO» M O S7 OtM >n •<M *"0 88 w?S M Ms*. J K 1 r> V- vf M i_..X ■*^ V /? r-'i. •V ■ %•'* • j 'v/ ;;;r S8SS88SSSSSSoooooooeoooo >V« W>9 Jb o 8i »-8» «»u« ^ O «H«»8IUI Wl W Oi ^ O • ••»••••••••• CiK» 8b M M O U« O ^ O O ^ A ^ A A ^ Md urn UI0I4 «»«8U_ - ___________ _• ••»••••••••• CiK» 8b 8b M M O U« O ^ O O » »m mm m OOOOOOO <049010 <0«M0 OOOOOOO ooooooo sisSipiSSli cZ'*3r5-2f-S •88l^--“ Cuf- -^SatooRMf*! n8g8.S^8*t!> il^pi5ii"== Sra Soi JO$8 515 Z^8s8 s si ** i^i ' ooooooo 0<DOO<0<OIO fsjfsiMbofsifsjisj ^KJ0lb«O89^b« '*^rsJ^MON>i/lb* OOOOl*IO<Ob« 0l8b*08b0^^ ocjMOOwnoo 0b8b8iO»6b8*ff* </></></» </M/l </)</> C/IOOC/U/JOO 8888888 mmmntmmm </>(/i (/)</) </)</></) ‘^HO^-DOO iisSiss o</ir-</iOf“r* niff<Ofon^*bi XQXJOOJO i’S'8S8? Ti *r m O </l m m m X JO JO KJKJfSJKIKIMfsl UMOUIUMIIUIUI • I I • • • I OOOMOCJCJ SSS8888 f I I I I I I OOOOOOO • f T I t i Ioooo< OiJOO< ooooooo ooo mm » » » KJOO b4 -< IM :z JO -n O •o 1-4 I bJ I M I O 9mm m 9 9 mmm m 9 9 KlOO mm» 9 fsjO<o mmm m m m bJO<o o mm9 u 9 9 O O o oo bJ o o fsi o bJ •s*o K> O bJ <ors> bJbj O ib^mo 8 2 O b4m O i •H r-m •orn 8o o Xm -Ti mo -< Mn •-4 O 8 I b- K> Ul I bJ ill O 18 bJ S ISI o CO bJ O bJ b-b—8h 8b CJOoobJb>8b ^^ Jb 8b ^ OOb ^ 8b 8b^cnui • •« ■• •b •• •• • oo CJCJ C8 0I OO bJbJ oo OO OiOb OO m a»oo 9 9 9 9 9 CO CJ !i: 8 I bj mo 1 8 :: s n o •o 90 90 84 o o r-PI m —4 -n •o m 2 PI •<o >-4 zm1M m "O 90 r“o 8b PC CO >PI C f“ O 8 90 CB •H 90 b^ n 88 o o O o CO PI o ^ ff m M Ji « »•»J»»»m CO CO »»»»b »m > » 1 m 1 • 1 • « » f 9 1 9 1 o O o o o o O :8f z z z z z z Of 10 CO CO 40 CO CO 2 ^ ( 1 • i i1 i '*4 i i ' ‘..5:..'TJ-V: " rWi'l*,:'; » m m m m mm-^. ^>’f- Mv;.'.S4- W'’'?‘"4 V lit" ^ S"( l,_« '- '•- 1^ ^ «r * v\.-'V- / •V-JmrM:i■'*‘-4 **KV. ' mm> ■■ gmm- ’V.''^- ■ Ww--fr# - : -r. ; mi L-'-;;■ .'fimi M O Nl Ut »« P I HI » » » » M O » » » * » ISI O <D fSI fsj O MM » » » » NJ O (O » V » » » » m H m m m • » m MM 00 ID 10 MM » » » » » » M O <0 Ul O » » B M O <0 M O ID M Ul • m m m m m O M Ul 0 0 0 00 *<«4 M MH M M M MM H*H»H« ID 10 ID ID«> M M M MM 0 00 0 0 0 0 H H M M MM M M M M H»H* H-H H-H-H- ID ID ID «>CO to «l M MM M M M ^J 0101 MM MM • • €JM H*H* UlUl D • UlUl CD 01 C*»M»« M^-UI MM CO OB MM MM MM^H»35 CJOM MID MM^CJCJ MM UlUl • m • •• •• • •• •• •• • •• •B •• •B • 8S MM 000 00 DhM*^U1U«DIOI ^ H*•BOB 00 mom 00 00 M Ul Hi CD CD BBCB •BOB 0 0 •»•m •m »•»»B mmo ??-n-n o 00 00 oo o o o 8 Hni im*i mm 0 1 MM00 </> os o 30m > oo or*c/> C/lX > 30o •D-D -flm Sc c/l <m z </) oo 1-4 > s HIs 8 i-io M H 00 0 0 00 0 ID M H*H»H*H-B-B-B* 1 •1 1 •1 1 •1 JB H JB H HH*JB ID M MM W CJ MM B* M CJ Ob *D b 0 B*CD ID 0 HO M 0 OB*M 1 •1 1 1 1 1 •1 Ob ID 00 BB B*0 B* H ID ID H |B MO M ID IP OO ID 0 00 ID I 1 1 •1 1 1 1 1 0 ID B*B»CD MO M 0 H>CBH JB B-B-O B* w I H I Ul ID I ID Im M W B B'B B •••B » m B •B »B B 0 B B -:•B B'•B B 0 0 B • ••t 1 •f 1 1 f 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9f Z yt :K PC X PC D •H B PCmPpPpPpPPp Hiz H HIs M I ►- M I tJ m o >s 3 3 c m 0 >P p H4 XH Cl z -0 35 BOs»r*X cc HI 0 >90 c m 0 0 —4 •1 m r"Sn 30 m B4 D*r-•0 p m m 0 0 m XX >-0 X 30 1 -nr-2 >-IP B4 > «o M mBo 30 BO 30 0 0 B C B 3 mm P S m > > 90m X p n P m Dlg CO -1 >3 ID BO r*-0 *C *o 2 3 ID g O HI Om OZo m O mo HI ID Hm I M O H I M C ( L M ->3 F £ ■’i '.V f t% 'l ‘ '<r■‘ V. ‘., >i V> v • '•» **i,> mr W' fcv- ' f. I'^'/’-V- . < i;' V-.‘wm.:W-'- ilk'''*' ilk.-'-' >'■ mm ■IW ¥t>- P- O O K> I c m '«im tBi 5 m m m m m m % K» O CJ CO ■>1^/ &J: It' j’ ^mfy m 8o >o 8 >m • m m • » fSJ o CO CJ fsl ►<* o K4 •H -< 8 s; -n o8 > O «0 fsl » » m m m m MK» OO OCD ss » » m m 9 9 K> N) fsj fsJ fSJ 00000 CO (O (O Od CO CJCJCJCJCi CO (O <0 <0 CD 01 cn cn C7I Ok fSJ o CO CJ O) C/I » » » » V K> o CO CJ CJI • m m w » M o CO u <k o 9 9 9 9 9 9 Kl O fSI OB • 9 9 9 9 fsjKJK>K> OOOO «>CO COCO rjKJMfsj ^ ^ ^ mtncncn fsj o CD rs> -si OO -h J --4 OOOOO SJ ^ ^ o -si o s4 o o 's| OOOO -s| -si -J KJK>fOKJISJISJIM o -S| ISJ COCO fsjISi CD COCO CO CO fSJKIhJf^JKI CO ro CO fSi CO ISJ oococo MMNiro CO fSI Mta COM fO^-^ M ►- ►-MMOOB sj OBCD^OI'-J MM U> CJ CJCJ cn CO MM M B- • « ►-KMilB-M ^CDOCi^CD MM COCO fllCO OO OO ^COM CJM^OO)CJ MM ^ -J CJ CJ CD CD CDB^KIOCD CD CD • •• • •• ••• •» •• • B B •• • OCD ►-'^OCJC/I o COCO MM OO OB OB MOO^CD •-* *— OO MCJl-si OB^OOBN- O 1 1 9 coco MM OO OO dboooin )OO •»9 m ••»B (/)CD -♦Hss (/)(/MDID4D CO C/I OOssr*r* C/UD siiss MM OOOOO iiiSi C/I C/I C/I C/l C/I C/I C/I 30300ccmmo -Oi^c-cZ mmmmz XKXX •OTI-OXX C«C4TI XC4• • <<c -<zm I Onm 9 9 9 Ism m 9 m • O:x CD ^■-, ,• ■ •* -?■ - it L»'«... , ;i-* ■ Xom OOOO Hm n Z C/I CD m m -Hm m CD M X X 8888 CD <xxxxnCDzzzz X X DIDirUfBl O o X^z •H r-rr-r" >H-4-H-4 -4 z z z zo o zzzzzooc^o H4 X X > 3D > 1-4 oz 99 X CD ssss m zzzz CD CD CD CD O O o O O OO MMM MM o B-B-B-B-UlUCUVUICil B- •1 1 1 ff C f 1 1 1 1 Dk ^ JB DkO^^ JB CD M CD CJM CDCiCJCJCJ CJ Dk CD MU3 COCDCDCDO Ok fsi M CD MM CO CD CO CD CD B- 1 1 1 i t 1 f 1 • 1 I M M B-B-B-DkDi ^ #B ^9* CJ MM OB BB BB BB OB M ID CD O COCO OOOOO CD I 1 1 1 I • fill I D b CD CD CD OOOOO CJ M M M 9^9»OOOOO B- 9 9 9 Io X CD » » 9 Io X CD 9 9 9 Io X CD 9 9 9 Io Xo m CD CDm i X I C 00 § o o MOOO M B-B*^b -b -b -CD 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 JB D»Di Di M CJ 00 B-B-B-k—CD CJ OB O CDUIUICII M M B*M B-B-B-B-O •1 1 1 1 • • • M o CD UIMB^B-Ob CJ CD CDOBs^M •B CD CD pm OCDXCD Oi f 1 •• lit 1 B-CD CDDBCJiJ O M M Ob CalMCJB*o m O X -4m On 8 XI M 8 0 S CO CD ISI O 94 o« o -cm 8 8 I no X m o M CD •Hm K» O ^ I X ^ ^ itCD O > D1 O Dl <> .’.•'I ,> V_-». ^ *<» .:i:k:■ !.'l V ■’•>■■“ J........-■ • T'■•» •••■ k'" V' ‘v;-:■■■■■ MM OOmmmm MM MM MM 8S V W 8S b:('V-mis- SW'® 'if. •r^.. A'i'iil. Ifr- '-iii ‘ 4*!* •A. '^•f. •i.|S%. ^'V MM MM PM •5 piim ite- » » » » w » I '" m M O m M M » » » » V - > 5 M Sm %91 I 2 Mm I m Mo 8 m M M » » » » 9 9 9 9 9 » # » » » • 9 U 09 O 9 » » » B M Om 9 9 9 9 » 9 9 9 9 9 MMMM OOOO «DM (DID 0> 01 OI OI » 9 9 9 9 MM OO IDO 09 Oi MM B 9 9 9 9 o o O o o CD M ID M M to M OO MM mmmm MMMM MM MOI • • UM MM m m MM MM MM OO 9^9^ 01 OI CJCJ OCD OO m • MM ID CO m 9*U»m9^9^ mmmmm o m cjm«^m MM MM MM C*)CJ mB*MOO • • • 9 • •^COM • • • 9* •• • OOOO • •• « MM • • mm -4 OO 0^0 ID MM OO OO c*»c^mm OO m^MOO MOM M •9 9 9 »9 9 9 9 B • 9 I O ID Om 94 ID r-c X r- ID X 94 s X 9t cm ID Xm OOOO ii sm Om CD •D 09 CD O O CD •V 30 8 o CD -4m none •H -4-*l -sosoaox ?0 30 --I-4 CD CD mmmrr << nnnn 30 90 90 30 DtDiniD^ mm m m 0 m 1 om o o o O -4 OOOO OO o •1m 1 o> B- 1 t-M 1 1 1 • 1 B»B- 1 1 (Ml M M M M M B* B* B*MM M M M BB mmmm ODi O•O• M 1 M • O 1 M 1 1 • • f • • V 1gl B M ►-O mb-b-o •MB* Ml M M M o JB^MO OM m• ID t O • m 1 ID 1 0 1 ID^OO till mcD 1 •wo w M M M o OMMB*MM o M ►-o MMB^m m»« •B B B • B B B B 9 B B B 9 9 •1 •1 ( o o o o osoXPIX30 ID ID CD CD CD » o PI ID » » » I O ID 9 9 9 Io PC CD O Xmn o o ro i 51 t! 30 30 B4 CD g mn •H m X l-i X >O ftl m B4B4B4BBxxxx HH o -1 CD C m CD CD CD CD m 8 19 BD r**01 B4 •H rn B4 CD fi M O ss o o mo ID t M O m M c ( ,i- •« f ■I A A j X •ii iff im Oro % ftfillriiiB iif r » • mm m M O » » fsi O » 9 • 9 9 Kl O lO Ul fOo ill » » • 9 9 9 K»fS4fS» OOO IOiO(D iHUIUI ID ID ID OOO » 9 » » * » Kl O ID LH 00 Kl » » » m m m.. ■ tea;. X:. ■ ■■t M fiS..'-' m ‘ ’V ? *. I ■ -i'■■ m 99 I tj'B k&.'V v& M fl i®;P -m- rl- t- "2'¥4.- •a?.m..i*-Si' r;rv ■'‘^ •'■’i n - ter V -■5' ■' ^Se ' •/* «a#;t ' ^ ‘S'lAi.Ks;HKw 5-/ >«» KIKI OOl • • liMD • • IHiH KIM MKI • • • • la M DIM'^OI ^MIOCJ MKI OlOi OO OO ►-►- ilMilO^^OIO» m *11 "D TP OOO•n fC|m c -C-4-4 o 9D 3i 07 •H -4 X f"Di f*i rn ;«CD 1-4 94n zzz •4 z C9 00 09 CD m XXX 'i»30 X OOOs X •or-CD CD CD *«30 X nc r-n •< >>o t-4 CDonCD Z r- -< •nn» 1-4ar CD ■■--t m 9 9 Vr • - • ■‘' As It 9 fo »m 9 os » o PC CD » » m t O » » » Io X CD V :• S MM OO CD ID 1/1 I/I Cl Oi MM o o o o O OOO O OO «4|«*«-M ■*-4 ^--4 V.V,V,•V. M M M M IM MMM M MM 0*0-•—►-•-1- V*.v» ’'CD CO CD ID O ID CD CD CD ID CD M M M M MMM M MM Mt- OM^ ^MCD » CD CD •D*D CD CD CD Z CCmC C O 1-4 -4-C 3D XXX r-MI-4 >XXX m f"r* r-ff >MM t-« t>4l-4 o -C-CmmmniMM OI CD CD CD riDi 1 CD CD o o o o -4 O O •^O M DIMM M MM •c 1 1 •1 • 1 1 • 1 M ^ Dt Di Di Dt Jt M M CD M O MMM Ctl MID UC €tl UliJiil MM M D^M M 99 MmC a I M Dt 1 1 ••1 1 1 t 1 1 1 ID 9»fSl M o UiiDM M CDM M CD M o CO^Jb ODt o CD O CP o OCDCD Di CD ID 1 1 1 1 •1 1 1 1 1 1 CD ill 01 C^o COCD^Ul CD^ M M M M o CtiMM 1*1 MM » 9 9 9 9 9 » 9 9 to X ID MMMMMMMMMM lOCDCDfDCOCDCDCDCDCO UUD1/1 I/I ID OI CD UMD Ul COOOOOOt OOOOOOOOOO MMMMMMMMMM <OCD<OCDCD<DCOCOCOCD MMMMMMMMMM CJ ►- CDMt^ CJ^ID C a I Ot OI •• M OO C«l M O OI U1 • ••••••ft** MCJtJOit-C<jH-'^^*^M cot—0IMM*-4^0lO0li-« $>>>>>$>>> xxxx xxxx fn Di fn ni ni fii Di ni Di rn xxxxxxxxxxZlllllllll rn d Di d fUdfD Difcifu CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD (D <^^*^MOOOOOO ^ C«l M M t-* ^ t-« M ^ t« I I I • I I I • I I MMMMMMMMMM M CJ bJ CJ M Ctl M Cl# Ctl »* * M ^ ^ iJ M M ti* O I I I I I I I •• I CDOIIDUIMMOMOM CDOIDtJb^^CDCDCDM ocd :dcdcdcdcdoc 0cd • I I I I • I t I I CO CO CD CD ^ Jb •-« 01 »*« CJ Cl/K> ^ M M *«4 M 1« 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 •o JT •- K» O CD o> V. M OO OO • • X. 5 Q I CJ M 0 1 O CD mo O« o -♦m 94 fn om CDo 94 •D >- O «D O t-4 < CD CD O fC| CO M O l-i -< so o n Xmo X mo 1-4 CD I M O I CD M Om ■ '-n-m { c * •.;i A ‘1 li^iiT<aiilfT4rflai t-v l« ■mM m «f-'c :■■m^'ipf ■‘Sa*'-- fe!*'-"v : Kl O CD • m m m » M O CD O)o> » » » » » » roo CO u CP » » » » » KJ o CD Oft Di Kl fSJ O CD Oft <u » » » » K» O CD oo LJ IP » » » » » O CD » » » » fSIM OO » p p p p p CPCPlPlPiPiPtP p p p p p p N» 0 CD •Nl CD 01 te'-,/fe- e O O O O O O OO N*V.V.V. M M M M M M M MM K*H*N-H*l— >s V,V.V. CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD M M M M M M M MM :>r mP‘-'l#-..:r^ f M fe>‘ life'.- '■:' th^ ns Vi". f&l%»v, !."X 'V '■ ■’•‘3:S IW' ;>■ ■•• ■■.’■!': ■‘^ f.!^ - . ■ ooooooo o Kl CD CO CD CD CD CD CD CD fSI c p-l O 3^S o CP CP -4m Xm c c C C >>>> -<X r- M m X -4 >X HI m -C «o X X >X 5 CP 1 Oo r*r- M HC Hi m4 Xmc CP > 51 << Him CP CP CP CP OO OO ccccrccc CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP no X P4 m §m Ms i m X¥-* 3P-0 nc> -p» >-4 OOQ-H-C-i-c >>>rcimfnm i-i o Sm CP Om 888 o •D o •D M o O M M M H»H* .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Pi p»Pto •■•Di»Pi M CD Cl X M X X M P i X X Oft \M CP H*X X H*p* 1^.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ►*CP X o M O M X X o pk X X X P i CD o X X •:•1 1 1 1 1 • i. *X IP CD X o Pfe p- X H»o M X MM I I ^^OOOOO CJM I C • i • I I CJM D»CJ Ulpk I Imui • I CD CD CiJCJ4JP»CD«JC«l iPiPiPMMMM CPCPiDOOOO I • I f * C I UICilOMP*»*|i* DMPOi^^MM CD CD CD CD CP CD CD • I C I I • I CDCDP^^iDiJCiJ MP«CPM^^P» iiSW Niv'i y .5 •».. ,„■. ■'i 1^,.S:/V w.:--. M -11s X CP 1-4 X P>C m O fT -n O 0 ►- 1 M M M CD I Cl P P p p p p p »p p p p p p p »»p p p p p »p m D p p p p p •p I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 • Q n o o o o o o o X X X X X X X:X X X X X X X X X X Kl O CO CP p-p-MM X 0*0 P P 0)01 XX XX ISI XX •MM H*p-p-XX MM XX XX XX •^X p ^MXMM p «XXX XP* XOI pi Jft XX XX XXM OXMMXMMX P-»P-OX p ft ft • •• •ft p o o ft «• • •»••••«•«•P o X OO XX Oft Oft XX OO MP-O ^MPPIPXMMCD MM XOmOOXOO^Di MfSl OO P-P-P-> XX MMMP^XXXX P*p-XO »p p w p P p ft f p •*f 9^ O ?o -< -< Or-m 0 1 CD ^ s CD O CD n O o o o Cl HI m X om IP O »-4 O oo Cl 8 M O o-n no X mo IH CP -1m I M C<o M CP > $ ^om r ( V h•':1 V-v '•■-.........Ai^- ^., i .. 'f* 45 7^.m •Kl M Kl Kl Kl Kl Kl Kl Kl M Kl Kl Kl Kl Kl Kl » o »o O o O O O O O O O o O o O O O » IP •ID X ID IP o o CD ID ID ID ID CD ID CD CD CD » o »ID o IP «D CD IP IP CD ID ID ID ID ID CD CD CD » »»-►-l-»►-K>k-^O O O O O O O O O » o •OI in cn Kl l-«O ID ••■H oc in Ul Kl » liifil;^' S%‘V,in liC'«r Oo ¥«5-'. mtm'- iiif- S&7;VV ’' Swife;:.:- sillp«8.^m::8 inP®;v. ^ ^S?if : «?« o m mo K1 n in > masm I M h9 M M I S 0 1s -■" JliSiS-*,; I^S i I in ;;{Sm n > X $ o X ffl C4m mm Sr*•n m 5 inm -nsI s sCM m ■* mo DHBi 8 i r* > X IH A Xmn inoo o an•HI X r C7 ffvi n O o l*Ji CP ffl w -4 i^P IH Cfl > rn z cn X PX in X ffl Ww X X 5 mA P LM Uim * f IH ffls•H f" PM C J •H % j •H ^ ■* o V*in O A O V#n rm 5 9 P^ X PfI bJ X ffl Am in •<1 • ■ ■• ’f O Kl 8 5 I •P >r*-4m tf An* O V? Ms inin mm m in ^ ;3•n IH om •-t X in -H S •< o cm in inc -n o m ti in Xo oo X IH oo r*in m in o I S is»o inin I M I in ffsi in in I Kl Inin I fn o ►- t o 0 ►* 1 in 0 I- 1 in I I o o ^ S o0 1 in I pn I I K> o • oin in M»n I incn I in f M mcn in I K» I in I in I in I m I Xin I in I in I•n I N» I cn IP fO I Kl IP I I Kl in m -p^ n M s I cn f Kl in i Kl Jb ^ Ul O a O O O o O O O O O O O O O o O O O > •*n •H •H •H 'H •H -4 O >N.V ■V V.V.■V.V.V.m X Kl Kl Kl Kl M Kl Kl K«IM Kl IM KJ Kl ISI IM Kl M s ►-K-1—►*K-I—►-►-K*►n C-►- N,*V.•s.V.\X.V.Vi o O X o X X X X X X X X X X X X CD X • I >. Kl Kl c^l Kl Kl Kl Kl Kl Kl Kl Kl Kl Kl Kl Kl Kl M KIKI • « XX XX « « XXmen XX oo XK- m m mm mm XX OO XX OO XX *H-H XX !• X 'H'H XX p • XX XX X X oo oo mm •n«n XX oo men oo mm XX XX mm XX oo X • •• •• •• •■ 1 •« «• •* «• •« B * «B •• •• •• •4 oo oo oo oo oo oo CO oo XX oo mm oo X oo oo oo oo oo XX oo oo oo ID CD OO oo •H'H oo oo oo 9 m 9 »» » »•9 m »»»»»»» » » » o S mo PI -Im -ImX on -4 S m O' Kl O -n i Kl Xin $om Om c ( ■■■^ * ' ■ r Xg^; :V^‘ «*■ ^■"-■ ■ Jh^- .|^"|t ten -"-n r'(?/'>-f • ■ V . ■ '» ■■':*• Wi A. ii& M f^. •.'- " •^' ifv ;•'-* * . i' ■• mm: :.-m >. -x^ "x -' .- - i- ISfSV liftfte :»:• j- ;ii . . h #telf ,, ft) ffi ni ffi #*• ni rn ni ni r* Q m m ^ < < !•! ni r- r- n ;:; S O "« o O 9 ffios o o 0 -4 1 « $ ’ O *n • O C4 ffi H ; § 1^ o om ffi Iff m 0^0i m i I * 5 « S 3 " w—m 8 ffi M 4/)r* ffi ffio o o X o o a o o o o o A'. o ffi X ffi > o ^ s s sffi X sX (/> ffl>1 ffl ffl ffi ffl ffi Kl O O O O ffl;si ffl </i ffl JH o c/1 2 O r*i 4/1 Ooooo ss: 2 S ffl ffl H S 2 O O i *n4 Cl K1 ^ o o fflo X fflo l/l -I ffl I Q O ffl X O % $ M o -H M ■»i S O -4 < M i 49m ffl fi M -I 2 O s O •Hm 2 22 O fflo % fS 8 8 § I Q ffl -I C/I «A VI Ms VI M 2 C > I s-H VI c (/I ffl ( oo hj o oI i i s 8 ffl ffl fflm m m ^ 8 8 8 8 8 9 e 9Vn S 2o *« 2 S 1-4 2 VI 19 ( Z c • J ■- i 'i a 1 ffi1 j ■3 1-4 1VI ^5 n, 1 ■4! ri J "" '^; n;:/ i;: v'Si' ;'-.'5?^ •'.'V.i?’'•■ '•A ‘^livV. ♦•rv: V, :^-. ? A:.|V •■» k§m-\ <t:m: fc's* Ift'"feiim:sSi-': COUNCIL MEETING JUL 2 7 W92 >i 4. i V I 1 I .1 4.- '.V ■ •■• ■•;.;■•' •>^^■. -.1:4; V. Isas. ■< ,.' ^ ;Sir i Mmmi::,m:^:SMi •^-1 ,v '. ,ilw.‘a4V.'..i A'-i-<3(r«jjak^ .... . --" .--^-...fae-..ii... .Wi,. '. -* i *•-. ■':,-' • ^ ____ tor' * * •^' '-^' ■'"• ■<; ^:^V%'.-.' I-if' |r' if- Sfe?;4 ;'?■,' ■^•. ,- jN.> .» * j |fe$- iffc-■ srtirs Ilf; f f ■• V ■'S' j m0'^: ' **=-'W»v ■' ^ ^'i ^ ?k Si*;; s^;- V if \ -i! ■' • • . ■ » '7 V, ^■ # • '7w ' :r fO: FROK: DATE: Ron Moorse, City Administrator Tom Kuehn, Finance Director • V July 24, 1992 80BJBCT: Auditor's Comment Letter Relating to 1991 Audit The attached letter from the City ’s audit firm of Malloy, Karno'««ski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. relates to the 1991 fiscal year audit completed June 1, 1992. The letter is for the purpose of assisting the City with financial planning and improvement of the records. The one area the auditors noted a concern was with regard to the timely depositing of city receipts, referring specifically to one instance where a check for about $17,000 was not deposited for a week and a half. The delay in deposit referred to in the auditor letter was the result of the check being receipted on a Friday, apparently after the cash register was cleared for that week, and being deposited the following Friday. The deposit delivery to the bank was apparently after the bank's time cut-off, thus b-=»ing recorded as a deposit of the following Monday. As a matter of course we deposit at least weekly and if there are large checks, such as tax receipts from the County we deposit on the day received. However, we will review the receipting/depositing procedures and implement such changes as are needed and practical. On tie whole the auditors were very satisfied with the City's financial records and the work papers prepared by the finance department. I would like to note that the assistance provided to myself and the auditors by Linda and Charlotte was vital and very much appreciated. m .r V':, •1 1.1 i #•01: -i 'm->L'.-: i%-mr m '»•<" pf'^ ii? iis*'' ■%S' ■ ■ :SI: .T ,-. . '-T A V:-: • V- - ^ t • i ^ ■ . ‘^■■ * fy L- ■ ' ■I' mm. :Si ?’/‘-vf;r*r-' V ;«''' 1-I PRWMCimLS KENNETH W. MAUX3V, cm THOM'S A. KAf»IOVWS* .CM muL A nAOooEvicH. cm June 1,1992 City Council and Residents City of Orono Orono, Minnesota We offer the following comments relating to your 1991 audit to assist you with the financia) planning for your City and the improvement of your accounting records. ComUtkm of City FUiandal Records We would like to commend the Finance Department for a job well done in preparing for this year's audit. The condition of the City’s finucial records, as well as your continued successfol involvement in die Government Finance Officers* Association’s, "Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Rqwrtlng" program, clearly reflects a commitment to excellence of which the City should be proud. GcocrtI Fhnd Flnandnl Condition The O^irrJ Fund continues to maintain a healthy fond balance at December 31, 1991. This position is even more critical consideriog the finucial position of die State of Mirnesota and andcipated cutbacks from diat source of revenue. Your current fond balance has provided die City with a positive cash flow during 1991 as graphically shown in our accompanying graph. "Cash and Investment Flow.” We encourage you to maintain this financial health, especially consideriog die potemial for future funding cuts and potential contingencies. ■eediils We ii iRer . *» t I’te.. ied instances where geimal rece4its held in die roister were not timdy deposited. In one , a dieck recrived for approximatriy $17,000 was not deposited until a week and a half We strongly recommend dial die City inclement procedures to deposh these receipts tm ly basis so diat no loss of revenue occurs. ^ ^ A' • _ I mm 1 is ww 'm: ' -i':'vrvMft . % :v.'’^- 2-‘- City Cotmcil and Residents June 1, 1992 Page 2 Dnig-FVee Workpince Act One of the general requirements for recipients of grants from the Federal Government is compliance with the Drug-Free Workplace Act. Under this Act, the City is required to publish a pt^icy statement following cotain guidelines as discussed in our prior year management letter. We want you to be aware that should die City receive future federal grant foods, compliance with the requirements of this Act must be met. Reqtdred Communications Statemrat on Auditing Standards Number 61, "Communication with Audit Committees," requires the auditor to ensure that certain matters related to the conduct of an audit are communicated to those who have responsibility for oversight of the financial rqicrting process. This letter constitutes our communication of such matters. 1. The Auditor's Responsibility Under Generally Accqited Auditing Standards Generally accepted auditing standards require auditors to plan and perform audits to obtain reasonable, but not absolute, assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclos'ires in the financial statements. An audit also includes aiutesiting the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. 2. Significant Accounting Policies There were no changes in significant accounting policies or their application during the year audited. 3. Disagreements With Management We have no disagreements with management concerning die ai^lication of accounting principles, accounting estimates, die scq>e of the audit, disclosures in the financial statements, wording of the auditor's report, or any other matter significant to the City's general purpose financial statements. 4. Difficulties Encountered in Performing the Audit We encountered no difficulties in dealing with management relating to the performance of the audit. •••' • ;^ ';?t- *.>-•.♦:h.■;’• I » '■' m^, :-v/ ■ ’■ m» vf" City CtMincil and Residents June 1, 1992 Page 3 Grtphic Information Microoon^niten are utilized extensively while performing audits of City records. A beneficial result is that certain trend analysis and analytic^ relationship information can be obtained. The following pages contain certain generalized graphs produced from our dectronk workpq>‘’rf- whidi may be of interest to you. Some of this i^rmation does tppeax in the various scheduies of the City's financial statements while some information is from other sources which m::iy not have been subject to our audit procedures. :>M-' t ,d -i'VSc' ■> ;m I :1 A } % : I *4 W^r.-:,WWi ■“‘.if'&v% •>., ir'-.^ffcV' p'-m Jfi'va-' mt *%>»= i-. . >iS^v/pli ws. IK' ;.> wm-m$ pm^r. Kip?; ;''v^?:SV' tt'Ar ipfeaiK^■p|!‘?S'' ':; . 'W--^ ■ ■ f{-’.K; Ptei Kti ALL FUNDS FINANCIAL POSITION arroFORONo Page 4 1 1864 1965 1966 1967 1966 1969 1990 1991 AS OF OECOyBOt 31 CASH 6 MVCSTMENTS > FUND 6AL 6 RET EARN CASH AND INVESTMENT FLOW cmroFOftoNo ra MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT MONTH END CASH 6 NVESTMENT BALANCES FOR 1991 □ GENERALFUNO ^ AU FUNDS DEC •r-;- ■f p' wM&M : -?..4j:vrgChi i i ■ ^ _____uv...>^-JL. *'*■ «g?i [fif ■ fe-m--hmi mw- W-' -• ■ '<^Xvm .:;i•?•/.• .•'/ yf." II City CotmcO and Resideiits June 1, 1992 Page 8 We would be pleased to discuss these conunents and recommendations with you and to assist with any changes you wish to make. Sincerely, MALLOY, KARNOWSKI, RADOSEVICH & CO. ,P. A Kenneth W. Malloy, CPA Principal KWMisel ,v.-> ■ -.-.j-’.**.* •■'■•'- .-A,.. 0■■i 1 'ii I 1-* ;‘r’ ..•i . 'V ■'■ mmmf —..’'.T-.Tii&iSSf • .■• ■■ % I r'.;• ^■> •• '>Vf/ • m-r iir'^'-W- ^iv WP' J:;;- ; •>.'•m0: ^M^'- V* te,m- l^iSt tf*. >•; ’ M: V.*/ ;;b: #t-v^'■?'■ . wnv^''::-m fe'# ■m %. I’'4. V s 'icm ■' I ■# r r' ^ ••.>‘•' |< ,v #^f. V 3^- ■! !• July 16, 1992 Mayor Peterson and Council Members P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 m 2 4 19^ Dear Mayor and Council Members: There is a growing problem with deer in our neighborhood of Wakefield Road. They are increasing in number *- jteventeen have been seen together at one time. 2)They are growing in size, one buck has a ten point rack. They are destroying our plants and shrubs to within 20 feet of our homes. The fear of Lyme Disease prevents us from enjoying our yards and gardens. V The deer are a hazard on the roads, they often dart out in front of cars at night. One deer appears to have a broken leg, there may be other injuries. There are no natural predators. Xt seems prudent that measures be taken to thin the deer population. One possible solution might be to provide meat for the poor. we appreciate the city taking action on this issue. Sincerely, ■lUx<^ A Paul and Helen Baszucki 250 Wakefield Road Wayzata, MN 55391 .. . ... . . . .. >1 i \ IS i ■■ 4 4 ,v2'0;. II III aiiryi I-liiMlifti i !/,“!> w' COMMUNITY PREVENTION COALITION Reducing Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Problems in Hennepin County ¥ f§»i.INFORMATION PAPER M; KEY FINDINGS FROM OPINION LEADER AND PARENT SURVEYS JUNE 1992 r P L )0- - "JUL 2 4 1'''^Chemical Use Prevention and Youth: Assessing Needs and fM’ .£ Resources in Hennepin County M m: sc-::. ii . t--'i; ' i5y’.» •• • T W;- CvC:-;'.-v %'re* Li July 1991 ippioximately thirty members of the Community Invention Coalition Needs/ Reioaices Assessment Action Group met a> discuss what they knew about needs and resources related topteventinf youth chemical use pioblems in Hennepin County. The group identified two tnajor giq)s in odsiing infonnation: 1) Information from a group of broadly defined leaders in local communities about thehr opinions, concents, resources and needs related to chemical use prevention, and 2) Infonna- parents about their needs, resources and concerns.M • * it • » 'M 1 » I f - ■ .'f , il. ‘if® By January 1992 diis committed group of Coalition members guided die development and imple- of the Gominunity Opinion Leader Survey of 476 leaders in Hennepin County and a telqdione sofvpy of 1 jOOO landomly selected Hennqiin County pi'ients. The survey was conducted by the National Adolemem Health Resource Center, a Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Health at die University of Minnesota. The results of these surveys are summarized on the following pages, and will be used ia the coming months to guide a long-range planning process for the Community fteventionCoal Pop If-It 1.1 "i'3 V- s die Opinion Leader and Parent Surveys, die members of the Needs/R< It Acdoo Groiqi agiwd on the following definition of prevention: Pnvtndem eem ke defined as a eoOebonUive process to pUm end impUmenl multiple strategies that promote fcaalfbj r Mmviors and Ufestytes, The Community Prerendon CoaStiom praeemes stroie^dmt: •M'. Sis-' WiiMm I. Reduce specific riskfectors contributing to Ufbacco, alcohol end other drug mu prob~ terns emd related behavioral problems among youth; and 2, Streug^eu a set of protective factors Uf ensure young people*s health and weU-beit^, mi 1.1^if I ^^*1 I fl ".V ;■.!■. J.‘'•'f. >;i? '£,j(iv. fei-: ‘ h;/.' siHi k*’'. 'V r./** * Conmunity Leaders Respond to Opinion Leader Survey ^ In October 1991 a comprehensive survey on imponam topics related to youth chemical UK was mailed to 800 opinion leaders in Henne pin Gounty. These individuals were identified as leaders based on their professional and/or oommunity involvement, and represented diverse jepgtaphic, racial and cultural com munities. These opinion leaders represented ten diffsaent community sectors including health. 9fbi^ law enfofcement/^udidal. treatment imyices, education, civic/volunieer, human/ social services, recreation, government, and business. i-.' S” m Three slightly different versions of the |Urv^ wme sent to leaden aqnesenting youth- •mving pwfessioiials , heads of youth-serving or Bth-oonoemed or ganizations, and other youth- UOnoemed opinion leaders. Responses to the UUivqf were anonymous and were received Jim 476 hxiividuals (61 percent). iilW&»n of the Opinion Leader i ^ T>pe oll 101 277 'I- 476(61.2%) It Head of jwth-serving organizations ♦ - • » I » ^ Ynudi serving professionals 'Community opinion leaders Avengeage Rmialfeaituial backgrounds: 0% Africa AsMiican : 2% AsiaPadficUander CbicaoddaxicaQ/La ' : :v.' 80% Aaeerica rfi •«* NNhcAaaiea m. 4* Odmi Averaiele Ihorietkfenoe inTwin aties 27yean k-.-. ij, ’ -2- tos'saSiL Parents Participate in Telephone Survey Parents play a key role in preventing their children's use of tobacco, alcotol or ocher drugs, but parents are rarely, if ever, systematically asked about their concerns, resources, or needs concerning these issues. During December 1991, 957 Hennepin County parents *»f children under the age of 18 participated in a telephone survey on tobacco, alcohol and other drug use issues. Parents were randomly selected by telephone prefix and 72.5 percent of eligible households pamdpated. This san^le included a supplemen tal sample of 141 households drawn fro m lower-inoome areas of Minneapolis to compen sate for the higher number of hou.« ‘Jiolds in poorer areas without telephones. Each interview took approximately twenty-five minuiBS. Parents participating in die survey provided an intimate view of their Cmaly life as they answered questions about: oommunity norms concerning chemical use: oommunity resources for prevention; the role of the media in preven tion; how parents communicaie with their duld- ren about tobacco, alcohol, and other drugs; general parenting practices; and use of lofaKco and alcohol by household members. 27% 19% Description of the Parent Survey Sample Total Number « 957 (72.5%) Family Composition: 75.7% Two parents living in household 21.4% Single-parent household Ages of children: Five and under 6-12 13-18 More than one age groupiiig AreaofResidenoe: 40% Minneapolis 60% SubufbenHennepin County Racial oompositioo of parents: 9.6% African Afflcfican 2.3% AsianIPKificIdander 1>9% Odemo/MexiemeVLatino 81.4% European American 1.0% Native American 3.9% Other responses 34% I .i >i'V I ' ?::f. j Summary of Key Findings: CPC Opinion Leader Survey *1 »;4”-''^'*r ... , t ■ '‘t-> I*'- ms -m ^AUohol is identified as the most serious chemical use problem for youth by a nugpiity of opinion leaders I.•TT ftv. ,JV> ;dv- •> l'W'''- ••;v , tiion leaden were asked to identify the five moauigent needs of young people in their com- munlQr. The most ftequently menioned re^oose was tobacco, alcohol and other drug use problems. The five most frequently mentioned needs were: • Tobacco, alcohol and other drug use problems • Family and social relationships • Abuse and ne^ea of children ddfop-outAmderachievemei lal proUcms and depr » • V • I 67% 66% 52% 41% 40% hi.i- ■ 2. The three most serious chemical use proUems for young people identified by opinion leaders all involve alcohol: $i ■ ;ia?: : i!n • Driving/Hding afier alcohcri use • Alcohol aid other drag related dime • Alcohol use during pregnancy lis^^ ir MuMpk factors contribute to cke uUetd problems 3. TheCrowriwbichopiniooleaderebelievecon' tribumioai significantly to chemical use ■'■ iprobleroa among young people include: • Peer pressure to use tobacco, alcohol and other drags * Laekofpositive role modelsma use and ibuse by other family H^?^«««tive parenting sUIb .tjl m; _ suppoit systems riaaioo of chemical use in the media positive ateetnatives for young people.................. vrv' v.;:- ■ mmi -3- ✓ Famities play a key role in prevention 4. Families play a key role in prevention and need increased education and support in order to play a stronger role in preventing youth chemical use problems. • 66 percent of opinion leaders identify family and social relationships as one of the most urgent needs in their community • Parental actions (or inactkms) were identified as a significant factor increasing youth chemi cal use • Parent/family support and training was the most frequently mentioned service gap related to chemical use prevention • 44 percent of youth professionals say they deal with some aspect of parenting concerns in their daily work with young pecqrie ✓ Glamorization of chemical use in the media contributes to chemical use problems S. Glamorizationofdiemicaluseinthemedia.e^)e- dally alcohol and tobacco advertising, is a serious problem that contributes to youth chemi cal use. • 63 percent of opinion leaders believe that aloohrri advertising has increased during the past three years 75 percent of opinion leaders support resiria- ing alcohol sales at recreatio events focusing on youthMl-i 64 percertt of opinion leaders support increased restriction of alcohol advertising 1 1 r |.i>' IIE^-'.mm^ (S'-■^'^' k’,^ ■ V; m ~m •jV^'i- - •* • {r-;&:-^r te"itfc" fe' ■PK ■ %c<‘. % 6. Most opinion leaden reponed that they have not coflUDunicated with representative^' of the media during the past year on issues relaird to tobacco, alcohol or other dregs. * 15 percent have communicated with editorial/ opinion page editors * 16 percent have communicated with radio sta< tkm represeittatives * 19 percent have communicated with metro newspapers * 24 percent have communicated with television news representatives 36 percent have communicated with com munity newspaper representatives Local community norms, sUmdards andprograms concerning chemical use need to be examined 7. There is a need for more racially and culturally qredfle prevention efforts at the local com* munity level. S. Chemical use piobleiiis of young people in any Ifennepin County community have a otwruy* wideimnaa Opinian Leader Survey Mmmmfim C«Mty hna mm impmO mm my J: , A I • tL . m-'m ■ 'pii #r'‘ - m;' : 96 percem of all opinion leaders believe that tobacco, alcohol and other dreg use problems of young people in another area of Hennepin County have an impact on their local com munity 9. As reponed by opinion leaders, the chemical use activities that put the roost young people at risk are often most accepted in local communities. TlKse include: • Expetimentation with alcohol and tobacco • Regular use of tobacco • Driving a vehicle alter some alcohol use ✓ Mqjor gaps exist in chemical use prevention programs and policies 10. Major program gaps in youth diemical use prevention iixdude; • Need for patem/family suppon and training • Lack of conununity-based programs • Insufficiem emphasis on preventitm in existing programs • Need for increased recreational ^vities for youdi iwfly ■ 'AgntiDigmgm? •4- '■4 4 If'Summary of Key Findings: CPC Parent Survey mi •/ Alcohol is viewed by the majority of parents as the most serious chemical use problem among youth 1. AI • • I •1 is viewed as the chemical canfjng the mott serious pioblenis among youth: cocaine/ cndc is idendfled as a major problem many Mimieapolis parents. Among subuiban parents, the types of chemi cals considered most serious for young people are: S-pf, -SAi?,- rf-ii"""rf-%y i I • A' Alcohol Cocaine/crack Tobacco Marijuana Other responses • AmongMi chemicals people are: Alcohol Gocaine/crack Marijuana Tobacco Otherr 66% 9% 8% 8% 9% • • fi 1^1 - lis parents, the types of red most serious for young I 1 •i- ’*.• ' 56% 23% 7% 3% 10% X*;.‘ ..j. mh.:. AA' X Parenu of teenafen seem to underestimate the use ofaloohol by young people. Among perents with children 13 yean or older, only 5 percent believe their child uaes alcolKd once or more a month. (In two surveys of Mimeaoca students, nearly 40 pereem of high school studems report using alcohol at least monthly.) 3. Parents believe that many facton tnflii»nr# young people 10 use tobacco, alcohol or other drags liMiiggi iiiy 'r5 • PoBBity problems including chemica! use by tally memben • Qffioaity • Meiha md advenisiiig messages ^ Strum, depressioo. rebellion -5- .' Communication about chemical use issues is identified as an important prevention strategy 4. When asked what parents can do to prevent chemical use problems with their childien. the most frequent response was commurncacioa Paiene rep ort dis cussing the following topics in their most recent conversations about each type of chemical use (as reptMied by parents who feel their efafldren are <dd enough to discuss chemical use issues): * Household rules about alctdiol use 60% * Health effects of tobacco 48% * Household rules about other drag use 26% 5. Less than half of parents have had frequeiu discus sions with their children about chemical use: • 50 percent of patents repon that they have triked about tobacco use with their children many • 35 percent of parents report talking about alcohol with thdr childten many times • 25 percent of patents report talking about other drags with tiieir children many times ✓ Schools and community t^encies are identified as key prevention resources 6. Schoob and ctmununity agencies ate idemified most hequeruly by parents as a resource for prevention information. • 61 percent of suburtwn parents would go to sdMMls for prevention information • 33 percent ofhtaieaptdispaiems would go to schools for prevention information • 31 percent ofsuburban parents would go to commietirif or county agencies for piev inform f • ! t I 44 peroem of Mioneapolis paretos would go to community oroouiay agenc ies forprevei infonnation f ■ • 1 1 :1 Mote than 30 pereem of all parents say diey would not know where to go for chemical use prevention infotmatioo II ■’"-7^ ■i#'f' m'- ■. sp ‘ h; 'V .^i\-yy ■ A ;< :■..; ‘v*’’ r ■ -K, * ’ ■;? . •%'. •■^■' ^ ■■ V-' ■'; '■ff'lv': / • ; ' ir >: V, '%¥ { * r., ‘- ■ V<^V^ . ✓ Parents are not well informed about community resources concerning . chemical use prevention 7. Most parents in Hennepin County beiicvethai resouroes for prevention in their conununity are not adequate. -■1:7 : . if##' * 53 peioent of suburban parents believe preven tion resoufoes are adequate * 41 pereentofMinneapolis parents believe prevention resoiUbes are adequate * 35 peicent of low income parents ($15,000 or less household income) believe prevention resources are adequate 8. Many parents do not know where to go for infor mation about preventing chemical use problems with childreiL 28 percent of suburban parents do not know where to go for infonnation about preventing chemical use pioUems withchildrm 40 percent of Nfinneapolis parents do not know whm to go for information about prevention 48 percent of parents in low income house holds (S1S4XX) c: less) do not know where to go for information about chemical use prevention Parent Survey Type of Chemical Perceived by Parents to Cause the Most Problems for Youth in their Community Tairn tOJ»% SOM . !<»**• \ J 3BM . MM . 10M . QM r. Aa j Crock Maft|naiu Tok noop Other rt Ail Qi them Type ai QfrinI Ceurtiig fVohlm for Youih •6- \\-\ t: ■. I '■ ; '_ v. J ■ 'f, '*^ A ■ fe:c- '■.''--.;fA •■ wm-' K. 9. Parents itpoit that they feervery connected” to the following types of organizations or groups in thdr communities. These organizations or groups might be good **informar avenues for disseminat ing prevention information or resources in addi* don to the more formal or usual sources of information such as schools. 1.- ✓ Parents suggest multiple prevention strategies 10. Parents suggest several prevention strategies for families: • Doctors or health care organizations • Youth groups or organizations • Religious organizations • Neighborhood organizations • Communicate regularly about tobacco, alcohol and other drugs Model appropriate chemical use behavior for children • Educate children about the effects of chemical use • Provide love and support for your children • Teach values • Monitor your children’s behavior and activi ties care^y • Get involved with chemical use prevention issues 11. 65 percent of parents feel mote restrictions should be placed on tobacco and alcohol adver tising. Parent Survey Phrents Who Report Talking *1Many Times** with their Children Regarding Chemicals sotm .IP.01I J I 4SJ0% .. 4(U>« X SSjO« 3(um ■ 2SM .. 20.M .. ISM .. tfluoa .. SM .. OM .. AlcoM <1-' -tl1 -7- rt. i-,:k- j. ;=i i-u- '.V i^'*k' ^l..^ K’ ■ X.' 4m(* #r ?vV i-. !>.•’ P;.,; ••■ .■ ■ ‘-^l’J: ,'■; -.i . m t jy; trv ,fe. [il. SK'f;; h.t, B-, #,» > Cfi, ' h r ix fe'i^r Complete Reports are Available from the CPC Office f h^« You can request a detailed report of the dings from the Opinion Leader Survey and die Parent Survey by contacting the CPC office Staff will also work with local groups to develop special reports of the dau to meet the needs of your agency or organization. Contact The Prevention Center. 525 Portland Ave. S.. Minneapolis. MN 55415. phone (612) 348- 6122. Voices For Change: Findings fivm a Survey of Community Opinion Leaders, Coimnunity Prevention Coalition of Hennepin County, January 1992,99 pages. The following reports arc available: * RiD report of findings from all opinion leaders Hndings according to community sector reprc sented (health, education, etc.) Bivlings according to cooununity (selected areas of Minneapolis and three suburban an nofthem, western and southern Suburbs) Parent PefipecHves: Finings from a Survey of Parents in Hennepin Connty, Community Prevention Coalition of Hennepin County, Jaauaiy 1992,231 pages. The full report includes findings analyzed by: * Area of counQr: Minneapolis, suburban Hennepin County, northern, southern, and m suburbs Family charactenstics: number of parents in the household, number of children, ages of children Household chemical use patterns: tobacco and alcohol use by children, tobacco and alcohol use by adults in the household Next Step: Developing a Long-Range Plan for the Coalition In the next few months the C^rrmunity Prevention Coalition will publish a summary repon of the findings from four components of our needs/resources assessment process: exist ing data from student surveys and other sources, opinion leader survey findings, parent survey findings, and the findings from focus groups with parents and youth. This report will provide a comprehensive look, from multiple perspec tives. at chemical use issues in Hennepin County. It will include specific recommenda tions for action that can be taken by local communities, and by the Coalition, to address current needs and make the best use of existing resources. This report will be used in the fall of 1992 to develop a strategic, long-range plan for the Community Prevention (joalition. All Coali tion members as well as other community members will be invited to participate in this process. Watch for an invitation in the fall of 1992 to particqiate in this process to identify a collective, long-range agenda fen* reducing chemical use problems among youth in Hennepin County. COMMUNITY PREVENTION COALITION OO HENNEPIN COUNTY PREVENTION CENTER 525 PORTLAND AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415 (612) 348-6122 i ■1 .Mim C, . . ■ '!.l' fr,l^<? • • ■< ,V ’•■ '.Vi ';.' ■C’-- , -i.r ;>. i:&>: .»'} % ¥''¥' -V ?'• e'.'.'‘ Wm y.'-''v->' r i .• 9- i'.H- tgj.'fc '"y- i‘r-v.1. :ivM is ■' ..•r^%- lii# c -<fV. COMMUNITY PREVENTION COALITION Reducing AlcohoL Tobacco and Other Drug Problems in Hennepin County c/o Heimeptn County Prevention Center 525 Portland Avenue South Minneapolis. MN 55415 (612) 348-6122 To: From: Community memben interested in chemical use prevention in Hennepin County Sam Grant and Louise Valandra Co>Conveners, Nends^Resources Assessment Action Group Date: Subject: July 21.1992 Key Findings: Chemical Use Prevention Needs and Resources in Hennepin County We invite you to read the enclosed summary of key findings from the results of two unique surv^s oofiducied in die past year by the Community Prevention Coalition. You were one of 800 community opinion leaders invited to participate in a survey on topics related todiaokai use prevention in Hennqnn County. This survey was conducted between October and December 1991 and was y onsoied by the Community Ihevention Coalition, a ooUaborative effon of moie Aan 60 organizations and agendes in Hennepin County. In the past year, we have been woriting to establiua shared understanding of youth chemical use problems and i^ntial solutions. We have done this using several strategies including a community opinion leader rvqr. a random sample survey of parents in Hennepin County, and a series of focus grou]» with A fiiud summary report of the findings from this process will be aviulableyouth and with parents, in Semember 1992. A more detailed report of the findings from the opinion leader survey and the parent survey is availi^ by calling the Coalition ofi^ at the Hennepin County Pre^tion C^ter, 348>6122. In addition, sulf members are available to discuss the specific ne^ or interests of your organization in the area of chemical use prevention and to develop special reports of the data to meet your needs, Please call us to receive a copy of the following reports or to di^uss the needs of your agency or oiganiauion regutfing chemical use prevention: Vniees For Change: Findi 1 ■ 1101 I Leaders. January 1992,99 pages. The following reports are available: -Full report of findings ffom all opinion leaders -Rndings according to comnuni^ sector represented (health, education, etc.) -Rndings according to community (selected areas of Minneapolis and three suburban areas: northern, western and southern suburbs) ^ ItHI ♦ I« It PersnegtivM; Findinya from a Survey of January 1992,231 pages. The full report includes find! -Arm of county: Minneapolis, suburban southern, and western suburbs -Fantily characteristics; number of parents in ages of children -Housdiold chemical use pattenis: tobacco and alcobd use by child and iJcohol use by adults in the household N in Henngnin zed by: pin County, northern, household, number of diildren, xo ■UMiaftA ■14600 Minnetonka BoulevardMinnetonka. Minnesota 55345Telephone (612)939-8266 • Fax (612)939-8248 |k^.. July 20, 1992 City Attorney’s Office Frovidir.^ Prosecution Scn'iccs for the cittes :>/: Mintteumka. Mmnetrisut. Omno and St. Bonifticius Sfi i".('4; Charlotte Erickson City Adainistrator City of Ninnatrista 7701 County Road HOW Ninnatrista, NN 55364 ; . ) Brenda Fisk City Clark City of St. Bonifacius P.O. Box 268 St. Bonifacius, MN 55375 JUL 2 1 J9Q;? Ron Moorsa City Adainistrator City of Orono P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, NN 55323 Ras Prosecution Services Dear Colleagues: Enclosed is a note from the Chief Judge of the Ninnesota Court of Appeals praising our four cities for our joint prosecution (P^yvifi»es. 1 recently iinrote an article about the venture for a Bar Association newsletter. I assume that is how he learned about us. . 4T 'll-'' Please share this with your Councils. Sincerely, ■ , :^'Va- ADesyl^. Peterson city^ttomey .... mmm A•1 li M *;■.■,-■■ i/r- (. r\ V A^n- '''i'i-f:%■ i'' •,* •' r > sP TO./ P-; l#c ■ <■'Kh' !fWr:-,\ •t Mnk vSftMpas®;''' ■?/''. ■,S/«5:v-vter ■H4 . ■ *# ■' ■:.:t;v -‘ .w S4/P.-T .'iW/- /^ ’‘.i.''' 'MiM ' I^ni':^^?^ ;i1'.‘>- : ;Ltv- V •'»’'>r: rA^r .•■■^isKscs&S ■>T:< / ■—1 il©i0 w Ifj^ JLL 1 5 !232 ^\yU w* 7>s^ V • '- - ' * D. /3. Wozniak Chief Judge Minnesota Court of Appeals cO:i,' ^ z6^ jWc V ■ &„ ^g’’k -?^a ^.'.r:;A.>w>.-si^j;3fe> i^ '■■j > ■'y: -'.« "si • "iJ >; f-i •. / M4i' r. I ■■41. s •J 'i.i’£5t^ . . i.%v3;v-».■' -’i®'m. 1?-rv-"U600 Minnetonka BoufevarcJMinnetonka. Minnesota 553-iSTelephone (612)939^8266 • Fax (612) 939-8248 City Attorney’s Office providing Prosecnfion Stm U es for the cities of: .Minnetonka. Minnetrista. Orono and St. Bnmfaciu.' 20, 1992 • ■■ ■ , -‘.’n P;m:. •* ■ i r ' iil %Cr:i^h:Vv lm« Honorable D. D. Wozniak Chief Judge Minnesota Court of Appeals Minnesota Judicial Center 25 Constitution Avenue St. Paul, MN 55155 Dear Justice Mozniak: <fliiiii]( you for ycur recent note and conplinentary comnents about our joint prosecution contract. You are known as an innovative thtn^^** regarding the adainistration of justice, and your coBSants are thus even aore appreciated. We continue to be very pleased with the results of our venture and believe that the court systea has also benefitted. I have shared your note with the four city councils who aade tills venture possible. Thank you for taking tiae froa your busy schedule to coaaunicate with us. Sincerely 0#i9 City Attorney 257d®fe,. \W. m ■■ t4-:' ■ ;> r -Vi', ii 31 1 i ••r i’ '■* 1'‘.J te- -• .J^- fm ■ m’k M'^ mi iw n^’'t;.-r •.' '.‘ H-,.$7 iV’ N -. -„ '.>v^5 ‘'.P LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT MINUTES TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (TRC) Meeting of June 25, 1992, 8:00-10:00 A.M. Norwest Bank Building Conference Room 900 E. Wayzata Blvd., Vayzata ! • I. Agenda and Minutes Minutes of 5/21/92 and agenda for this meeting approved. (Note: Meeting chaired by Ed Pick in absence of Jim Uttley. Attendance list attached.) II. Flexibility Request Follow-Ups A. Orono ^Ed Pick distributed copies of 4/7/92 letter from DNH to Mike Gaffron requesting ;nore information regarding the definition of “steep slope* and justification for the proposed 'lock -box' setup. He also distributed copies of a 5/29/92 response from Gaffron. In the letter Gaffron indicates the Orono City Council has consldercjd the items and can accept 12% as a cutoff for steep slopes. However, they still request that lock boxes be exempt from a OHWL setback for several reasons: u, • u*. % - The proposed size constraints (20 sq.ft. & 4 ft. height) would ensure lock-boxes have minimal visual impact as viewed from the lake.The approach was developed for properties with steep banks at the shore where requiring any setback would entail excavating into the slope, or placement on top. defeating the purpose. ^ ^Since Orono is not allowing “water-oriented accessory structures' and has a more restrictive structure setback, allowing lock-boxes oi. some properties will produce less visual intrusion, grading, and impervious coverage near the lake than going with the minimum DNR requirements. these. Tom Reese, attending LMCD Board member, asked if there is “color requirement for lock-boxes. Considerable discussion then ensued by several members regarding ‘''“ds-offs involved w th setbacks^ “aJiS'^t^r^ril^riicSs:- *Se2b:?s 5 fP « strong opposition to the l.',ck-box proposal, but ^ further in writing during the 60 day review “"d comment period. Pick explained that the review period styled on 5/29 when Orono responded to the earlier DNR comments and questions. Jo Ellon Burr raised concern regarding consistency granting of flexibility for specific itys from one cUy t another. Pick responded that each ytys request is a package, so the degree of flexibility allowed form city to city individual items may vary. vj te M. M- mB mB- mM’;i|.. ISm^' tet- '* ^t,>v :, >> ®4 Mm & r^^'fsp-- rm' "i- 91 >>• »s-. Ikr- ... ■ Tom Reese raised the shore lighting issue again and gave a description of its seriousness from both esthetic and safety perspectives. Pick responded that the TRC earlier reached the conclusion that cities can adequately handle problem cases as ’’nuisances.” Toro feels a stronger approach is warranted and intends to draft some ordinance provisions the cities can consider as they prepare shoreland amendments. Pick indicated he would c.lieck with the DNR boating safety staff to see if state or federal regulations address the issue. Nick Duff suggested trying to get the County Water Patrol to notify cities of safety problems with specific lights. IV. Future Meetings. (one member leaving, so considered early.) After polling members about possible dates, Pick announced the next meeting would be July 21st (since rescheduled to 7/28) with Spring Park’s and possibly Woodland’s flexibility requests on the agenda. Puture meetings will be on the third Tuesday, with Wayzata's flexibility request possibly on the agenda for August. B. Minnetrista Ed Pick suggested that cities submit their flexibility request packages to Steve Prestin for his review prior to submittal to the DNR k TRC. Steve will check to see if everything is in order before Members and DNR staff start their review. Jay Blake mentioned the City’s request has been revised to include a deck provision (only applies to other lakes) and a higher impervious coverage limit for the Douglas Beach District which is being mitigated by a stricter limit (20%) for all other areas. III. Other Flexi'oility Requests A. (No other cities were ready) B. Spring Park will be ready for the July meeting, and possibly Woodland. Shorewood and Minnetonka Beach should be ready for the August meeting. Excelsior has hired a consultant and Victoria stiff are currently developing shoreland amendments. No one seemed to know the current status of Minnetonka, although someone mentioined a new staff member has been hired. 1 4 r: A ■i J TT7 — P^- '■'i, '- ' Sf? lm&- L_- . »,i • - f ift-' .y:; ^■rv^r ■ ..,tea.' •v.K ^!:v-y-^vrW''- -• p.'''N;'^y^i''k>\‘ -^'^,’;-:.y^- .:-v. PISK 1fc'.‘ * •:■■ ■ :. •'.» . f v..r - '*4*v>'T/^C- 72*4 Ca5!lUji,te^ • • 9 .,k ;#•• «»« ir- Cf......... C^po liiA. i A<ior(r 0rfVtvCTVA4ltft4 IS )r' f: rVv'tMx.^C^v- S>rin h _______ f /Mlv#s4r .L/n<^ .. - - - ^/CctAJC^..................... fVAMraJYtV^ '!i li V • ^ %111y\1»11• • •.111! I; ,. ^ *4B ' • « I .• ■f .TjcS. 4» • • •*•«• • • •«• «M * i®y;4 ■p-'' ii';'■•.. IS't" »v-r '' '^' I©" m-- pit ;■ ..TTi'^'V,, ... - ^iw. ^mv "■ M0t- mt >■■ t»- ’•*••. •, ■ :Jmrnm mmpip^ ig|f^>. •■9 p-^. hr .i'!' «iWslsM^:..IK*affiilli TO: PRON: DATS: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator July 27, 1992 SUBJECT: Recycling Costs Attachment: Memo From John Gerhacdson Regarding Ppring Clean Up and Yard VJaste Program Coses The total recycling related expenditures to date are as follow*?: 1. Contract Recycling $ 63,180.00 2. West Hennepin Recycling Commission Costs 2,500.00 3. Spring Clean Up & Yard Waste Program Cost 29,480.00 TOTAL $ 95,060.00 The projected revenues for 1992 are as follows: 1. County Recycling Reimbursement 2. Recycling/Clean Op Fee $ 52,540.00 32,500.00 TOTAL $ 85,040.00 The expenditures to date for recycling relati^d programs have exceeded projected revenues by $10^020.00. This is cue to the spring clean up and yard waste program participation and volume far exceeding expectations. There are several issues related to the recycling programs that need to be addressed. The:re are listed on the attached memo. 1 i t 1 ■=i - i^‘, r:.-» 1'^•d ;. li;-:' t^ff' ki'--' IS-- '^'Ji *W t ■u':<- ■E-:m ■ : "- ^ = '-■ > r:‘ ■■^'>r i:’-V * ': IT': U-i?' fc- •■V •K: S- h^- l:iiki' AGENDA rOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JULY 27, 1992, 7:00 P.M. (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon request. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be o^ained upon request from the Recorder. ^Oi/i ROLL CALL 1. CONSENT AGENDA* Ji Ory ^7 APPROVAL OF MINUTES i99g 0 * 2. Regular Meeting of July 13, 1992 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT - JoEllen Hurr Representative POBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT ••APPLICANTS** Immediately after the Council has reviewed your application please sign the three (3) original resolutions at the Rect/:cer*s desk. Applicants need not execute resolutions for subdivisions, vacations and denials. 3. 4. 5. 6. #1752 George W. Kalweit, 4265 Forest Lake Drive - After the Fact Variance - Resolution #1754 E. Leo Bullock, 2940 Casco Point Road - After the Fact Variance - Resolution #1756 Robert E. Wilson, 4156 Highwood Road -Variance - Resolution Proposed Zoning Ordinance - Ban on Styrofoam Dock Floatation NAYORA^OUNCIL REPORT ENGINEER REPORT 7. Pay Request #5 Highway 12 Frontage Road Street Improvement - Sewer, Water and 9. 10. lx. CITl ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 8. Fuel Storage Bid Award City Clean Up and Yardwast>? C 'Sts Fire Service Alternatives Amending the Assessment ^c' 1 for the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project - Resolution Ordinance Amendment to Allow an Extended 'i ime Period of Hookup to the New Stubbs Bay Sewer System Amendment to the City's Fee Schedule Concerning the Sewer Service Charge for Un-Connected Properties - Ordinance Amendment Ordinance* Amendment to Allow Partial Pre-Payment of Assessments 12. 13. 14. MX -XpAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JULY 27, 1992, 7:09 P.M. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. Application of Certificate of Payment #5 Kraus Anderson Construction Company Steenbur9~Watrud Const. Gephart Electric Molin Concrete Gresser/Concrete & Masonry Allied Mechanical SubrecipienW Agreements and Resolution Year XVIII Community Dei^Jloptaent Block Grant Program Fell*^ News Letter AsMnding Designated Signatures for POST Disbursement Money - Resolution Public .Information Meeting Concerning Leaf Street Reconstruction to MSA Standards Joint Meeting with Planning Commission Council Participation in Corn Days Parade 21A. Temporary Employment Orono Golf Course CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT LICENSES (22*) feBILLS (23*) lfe-;..,Aiw pivV' IRNHBNT tNPORMATION ITEMS INCLUDED IN COUNCIL PACKET Letter Dated 6/1/92 from Malloy, Karnowski, Radosevich Letter Dated 7/17/92 from Dept of Environmental Management May Update - 1992 Directory of Minnesota City Officials Miscellaneous mr OPCOHIiiC ISSUES AND EVENTS Council Meeting 1 p.m. •1/03 - Council Work Session Preliminary '93 Budget 3 p.m. 0S/03 - Planning Commission Public Hearing 7 p.m. Comprehensive Plan Aaendment 08/04 - Park Commission 7 p.m. 08/10 * Council Meeting 7 p.m. 08/12 - Lake Use Committee 7:45 a.m. 00/17 - Planning Commission 7 p.m. 08/24 - Council Meeting 7 p.m. 08/25 - Filing Opens for City Office - November 3rd Election 09/08 - Last Day to File for City Office 4:30 p.m. - November 3rd Election '•‘j Vv Vi 4 • 1. ■T7?r^^^T 7’ -=^ ^. • - -vv^rbf^mM^ " ■‘P'i ■feH : •■>- ■ '■Ai‘' • I'j'*.’- Viit ‘‘ f& ■J'?' e? , ........ ;#- VJji- ■; ■■ t\m^vp^'- :m-’ : f'ts- '■ ■ ^S?i, IS--*W^- l^y SF'-’ i‘- '•■ A:\ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINq^ HELD JULY 13, 1992 ROLL %Sfe, The Council met on the above date w th the following members present: Mayor Barbara Peterson, Coun' imembers Gabriel Jabbour, and J. DIann Goetten. Mary Butler and Eoward Callahan were absent. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Ron Moors#, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, Finance 01 rector Tom Kuehn, Building & Zoning AdmlnIstrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning AdmlnIstrator Michael Gaffron, City Attorney Tom Barrett. City Engineer Glenn Cook and City Recorder Terl Naab. Mayor Peterson catted the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. (t1) CONSENT AGENDA Goetten removed Item #23. It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Goetten, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 3, nays 0. Motions for all Items adopted by consent agenda will be Included In the minutes in their respective numerical order. (»#2 A #3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Goetten, to approve the minutes of the regular Council meetings heU! on June 8, 1992 and June 22, 1992. Ayes 3, nays 0. PUBLIC COMMENTS Pat Crane, 285 Leaf Street, asked If the Council, at this meeting or a future meeting, would be considering the expansion of Leaf Street. Gerhardson reported that the City would need to wait to hear If the project can proceed and the neighborhood would then be notified of a hearing date. (•4) #1739 ALBIN NELSON, 600 OXFORD ROAD ~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3137 Mr. Nelson was present. Moorse explained that the Council tabled this application at their last meeting because of concerns over ti.e removal of mature trees on the property. i-- m^.'^■V.Wip# ■ rtm. iX- 1''-. ^ >- '■ ^-J-'i '' ' !' ■, > - 'i| ^%y{. iw. ; h'' ■ tM. ■ km '■ ^.v- V ■ r » > ■ '■■r' _avA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1992 ;-:V|-^•V ZONING FILE #1739 - CONT. Nelson noted that the survey does not indicate the trees are to remain. He stated that the area in front of the pool is actually a Minnesota woodlands. He said that removal of the designated trees will allow the other trees better lighting. He noted they intend to replant bushes on the slope because It is very steep. Mabusth reported that she and the City Engineer Inspected the site. She stated the Engineer's report did not specifically address the loss of trees as It would be minimal in Iight of the adjacent heavy treed area. She felt It was better to install quick growing vegetation on the newly installed slopes to prevent further erosion. Jabbour stated that Butler’s concern was preventative measures to ensure the other trees wouldn’t die. Nelson noted that the trees provide privacy for the pool area and he is very concerned about maintaining the existing vegetation. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3137 for Application #1739 for Albln Nelson, 500 Oxford Road, approving a conditional use permit to allow filling in excess of 100 cubic yards. Ayes 3, nays 0. (#5) #1741 RODNEY & SHARON BATZLAFF, Ills BROWN ROAD SOUTH - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3138 Mr. Batzlaff was present. Moorse explained that this application Involves a request for a variance to construct a detached garage to be placed in the front setback area and within 23’ of the right-of-way. Mabusth noted that the applicants have agreed to move the shed In the rear yard that encroached the north side of the property line. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3138 for Application #1741 for Rodney and Sharon Batzlaff of 1115 Brown Road South, approving variances to construct a detached garage In the front yard setback area. Ayes 3, nays 0. •C' ■^.it *5^: -^iijIk •»^ VcUK V f!r K m0U.. ■■" ,:r0 iS.'-9 ■■■*■-,Zoning File #1752 July 22r 1992 Pago 3Additional Coments and Planning Commission RecommendationAdditional Exhibits Exhibit J - Kalweit Letter of July 17, 1992 Exhibit K - Draft of Planning Commission Minutes 7/20/92 Planning Commission members were concerned with the hazardous condition of the deck area in its incomplete state as railings on stair areas and within certain sections of second story deck were not installed. Applicants adivised that it has been very difficult, especially when young children are visiting their home. Applicants have requested that the application be scheduled before the Council at their July 27th meeting. Planning Commission members concurred the application be scheduled for immediate action so that the railing can be completed and the structure restroed to a safe condition. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission's unanimous recommendation. Isv ^1 j•i . •> *, ‘ '■i.■' • i J' ■ - *>v fm-r ■ :ifc.: A RBSOLOTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MDNICIPAI. ZONING CODE SECTION I0.22r SOBDIVISIOH 1 (B) AND SUBDIVISION 2 PILE #1752 WHERKASr George W. Kalweit and Katherine M. Kalweit (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 4265 Forest Lake Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows; Lot 8, Block 2, Forest Arms, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for after-the-fact variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) and Subdivision 2 to permit major structural repair to an existing deck located 69 feet from the shoreline instead of the required 75 feet and seek approval of a hardcover variance within the 0 —75 foot setback area where no hardcover is allowed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1752. The property is located in the LR-IB, Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 1 acre in area and the property consists of .86 acres. 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 20, 1992, and recommended approval of the proposed after-the-fact variances based upon the following findings: A.The home was built in 1970 prior to the current lakeshore development ordinances adopted in 1973- 1975. B.The deck is in a hazardous condition requiring major structural repairs. Page 1 of 4 'J I1 1 4 •1:i ,.'i •••.fc ■fe'.'^-^' liftK- L-V -.^x. ir. H. ^v. ftH- t*::. tex/: to- ■ft:ls<.- Ik’- # M ' nte;py'"-' WWf-r'^m ■Tk*^h' Sift F'Xty : ■ mm^-P^- X if ''‘■ftx^j"^:‘‘>- fii- ■ '•V i-ii#p'^f^ M ■■'fft'5 A RBSOLOTION GRANTING VARIAMCBS TO MONICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) PILE #1756 NHBRBAS, Robert E. Wilson (hereinafter "the applicant”) has an Interest in the property located at 4156 Highwood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 23, Highwood Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and ilP-' *'WHBRBAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit the reconstruction of a three season screened porch located within the 75-250' setback area where there already exists excessive hardcover at 3,040 s.f. or 39.58% and only 25% is allowed and a variance to Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) seeking approval of a side setback variance as existing structure is located 2* 9" from the side property line instead of the required 10*. MON, THBRBPORS, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1756 The property is located in the LR-IB, Single Family -ftOLakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 43,56 s.f. or 1 acre in area. The property consists of 11,535 s.f. or .26 acres. 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 20, 1992 and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings: A.The proposed structural improvements to the three season porch will not involve an expansion of the structure. Page 1 of 4 1 fovlv'''fe\j^- If- kfe- '^Oi.r pv m-'" ISP' p\W- B. ■fe. / U- ;Vi ■ i|i^ mf.tec '^v WM-[km}> • i:' ,-'te^.:;. W'^V - v-> c. The residence was constructed in the early 1940's prior to setback requirements and prior to the City's shoreland regulations developed in 1973-75. The City has received nc written or oral comments from adjacent property owners. :;'r‘ . -1^ lit Imj^r ttipmm€IfCfr'' s> 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5, The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. COMCLDSIOft.'^, ORDER AND COMDITICHIS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 permitting structural repairs of a three season porch located in the 75-250* setback area where an excess of hardcover exists at 39.58% and a variance to Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) as porch structure is located 2* 9” from the side lot line instead of the required following conditions: subject to the Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (July 27, 1993). Page 2 of 4 li,. W*'-if>'' Y'*'- ... . a-' . ■■ i;... .li,;-. juL e»*r*No stokm sc«f« rCiNST^ JCT Cft ^£>i' *•» ;■< 'S cc^ch; Hi c* s.v -: r4!*T *.j :» CXISTINQ C.t. IMS LME Wipl ."«!1 ■'.‘4 . . .. • ‘ hi* |y-1# - "-i iiMiWiMMi OouncJf ■y «ii»y f -i -»k- to a «i • fWM •7^***' •toto «r totoir «r f« aH«4 %T & ■rt- SMKTiarfl }. -- I I :p!i '■% Coufuui :’iv:^''« ,1I li ■t'fmipii & fe1 'SSSiiifii V-'Wi ■ S' \ %fff/--Clf sM ,"■ r I