Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
07-13-1992 Council Packet
iWIMF*-i'.V.\• Pw' • •m -•- •' M.k -I0¥^wp-’i . -^ ■te* s*V '/ % v.' V ,;,f A ■•■■ <.■■■■'•^ % .V UL r ••~ kik. I .T ■®lrf ‘*'’“^' liSS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD JULY 13, 1992 ROLL Th« Council met on the above date with the following members proaent: Mayor Barbara Peterson, CouncIImembers Gabriel Jabbour, and J. DIann Qoetten. Mary Butler and Edward Callahan were absent. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, PubiIc works Director John Gerhardson, Finance Director Tom Kuohn, Building & Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Admlnlstrator Michael Saffron, City Attorney X0tfi BArr^tt, City En9ln##r Qlenn Cook and City Racordar Ter I Naao* l4pyor Peterson cal led the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. (#1) CONSENT AGENDA Goat ten removed Item #23. It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Goetten, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 3, nays 0. Motions for all Items adopted by consent agenda will be Included In the minutes In their respective numerical order. (e#2 ail; /^M»ROVAL OF MINUTES It waa'••ov«.'*Mayor Peterson, seconded by Qoetten, to approve the minutes of the regular CouncIJ meetings held on June 8, 1992 and June 22, 1992. Ayes 3, nays 0. PUBLIC 00 Pat Crane, 28S Leaf Street, asked if the Council, at this meeting or a future meeting, would be considering the expansion of Leaf •traet. Qerhardaon reported that the City would need to wait to hear If the project can proceed and the neighborhood %M>uld then be notified of a hearing date. (#4) eiTSt ALBIN NELSON, BOO OXPOSR) NOAO CONOITtONAL USE PONIT - REBOIUTION #3137 Mr. Nelson was present Moorse explained that the Council tabled this application at their last meetlnp because of concerns over the r«sovai of mature trees on the property. I ■>•.1-• f* I A ■t.J l*f-'IL :LIT.* ‘j:..^*.r.y- ii' ■ § r- ,S:.. vlifi , - wiilr -.r |l* pv . -'^P- ^:f'-:'-". MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD JULY 13, 1992 ZONING FILE §1739 - CONT. Ntiton not«d th«t th* survey does not indicate the trees are to remain. He stated that the area In front of the pool Is actually a Minnesota woodlands. He said that removal of the designated trees will allow the other trees bettor lighting. He noted they Intend to replant bushes on the slope because It Is very steep. Mabueth reported that she and the city Engineer Inspected the site. She stated the Engineer’s report did not specifically address the lose of trees as It would bo minimal In iIght of the adjacent heavy area. She felt It was better to instal I Quick growing vegetation on the n^wly installed slopes to prevent further erosion. Jabbour stated that Butler's concern was preventative measures to ensure the other trees wouldn’t die. Nelson noted that the trees provide privacy for the pool area and he Is very concerned about maintaining the existing vegetation. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten. to a'lopt Resolution •3137 for Application #1739 for Albin Nelson. 500 Oxford Road, approving a conditional use permit to allow filling in excess of 100 cubic yards. Ayes 3. nays 0. (••) *1741 MOONEY i SHARON BATZLAFF, Ills BNONN ROAO SOUTH - yANlANCfi - RESOLUTION •3138 Mr. Batzlaff was present. Moorse explained that this application involves a requeet for a variance to construct a detached garage to be placed in the front ••tback area and within 23* of the right-of-way. Nabusth noted that the applicants have agreed to move the shed In the rear yard that encroached the north side of the property line. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Raeoiutlon CSISB for Application ei74i for Rodney and Sharon Batzlaff of 1119 Brown Road South, approving variances to construct a detached garage in the front yard setback area. Ayee 3, nays 0. -'•y sSclI , 'i i i: 4 r,' 5 V-i■P ■0^ ^^ Mi nalAr.v'amiu. r'W -4 If?. WSf P^grmm‘;fg^ 1. L^im ff'-’■■• Vr m. %hi pi? ., , , -- % m-. m -’Ammm "fcr. (')j'.. fm. Wim ■]*^ ■ -■■I-'?:|>.?'V J€V:' It;i»' Wi. '■ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING held JULY 13. 1992 (•6) #1742 JAMES A AMY LAING. 600 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD - VARIANCE “ RESOLUTION #3139 Mr. and Mrs. Laing war# present. Moors# explained that tnis is an application to allow the coh#tructI on of a f awl Iy roow/garage addItion replacing an existing . and for a bedroom addition to the south side of th# residence. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution #3139 for Application #1 742 for James and Amy Laing. 500 Orono Orchard Road, approving variances to construct additions to the existing residence. Ayes 3, nays 0. (#7) #1743 ALBERT HANSER. 1685 FOX STREET - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION #3140 Commission meeting at She said Orono’s pastGoetten stated she attended the Planning which this application was last reviewed, policy has been to allow non-conforming structures with the condition they meet current code for any structural repairs. She noted the applicant has reduced the subdivision from a 5 lot to a 3 lot division. At the last meeting, the Planning Commission changed their original decision ano recommended the applicant remove the two non-conforming structures, the shed and tennis court. She disagreed with the Planning Commission’s decision. She asked about the driveway. Nabusth c lari fled that the Planning Commission recommended that the drive be allowed to remain with the appropriate variance approval. Goetten asked about park dedication. Mabusth reported that the a bike trail easement will be taken along the property line, and an adiustment to the park dedication fee will be figured for such easement. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution •3140 for Application #1743, Albert Hanser, 1685 Fox Street, •pproving the preliminary subdivision with the appropriate amendment to the conditions of the resolution regarding the non- conforming structures. .iSt -Si ..J- t iH MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1^32 ZONING FILE #1743 > CONT. Jftbbour Asksd th#t th# fnotlon bft amended to al low for th# application to ba raconaldered If this Is not agreeable to the applicant. Goatten agread to the amendmant. Ayes 3, nays 0. (a#a) 1990-91-92 COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE - WINDWARD MARINE ■ It was iBovad by Mayor Paterson, seconded by Goetten, to approve Igeuenca of a conv srclal dock/marlna license to Windward Marina, Inc., 1444 Shorali.ie Drive, for the 1990-1991-1992 license years. Ayes 3. naya 0. R® I Ci9) REVIEW MINNETRI8TA PROPOSED SMORELAND ORDINANCE FLEXIBILITY Mooraa explained this is to allow the Council’s opportunity to review MInnatrlsta’s proposed shoreland ordinance flexibility request. is very close toUabbour stated that Minnetrlsta’s philosophy K|i^ snd stated they should show their support for MInnetrista. ■ .. . . . Qootten suggested sending a letter to MInnetrista expressing the Council’s appreciation for the opportunity to review the proposed ordinance and noting Orono’s support. It was leoved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Jabbour, to direct •taff to send such a letter to MInnetrista. Ayes 3. nays 0. filO) METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 64/640 - ANALYSIS OF ORONO’S CURRENT SITUATION Jabbour asked about the possibility of the Metropolitan Council stopping the Stubbs Bay sewer project because of this issue. \r ^ Moorse felt that the project would not be stopped because of dpnsity. He said the noxt step would be to get that opinlor; in writing. Me noted the Metropolitan Council would be reviewing the Coawi rehens I ve Plan aakendment within the next two weeks. Saffron noted that a separate cooprehensive plan amendment is planned to extend the MUSA line to the Stubbs Bay area. Moorse stated that he felt that the Long Lake area would also be approved. ■Hv Jabbcjr felt that they should get approval of Stubbs Bay area first. 1 2 A. i' .h J, i’i *'v I *rjv^ejr?-•^:^/r>r:/ '-^■> £t ■pwr'iir^^ /Mi‘9;;. A*Mr te: lift?;’ ■ pM,' ■’ isatv- m ^- - " i;#p'- ^1IP. ;:.'-n; m.m- ■’■■:■ ;sm^ : > msm 4:^:^^:7pv #Rli« "Sails mm:,g !V".W - '-^ ;fe <:■ ■■' HINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1992 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 94/940 - CONT. Moors* Slid that ths Stubbs Bay area is unique as there are not any nsw lots beinfl created. Qoetten felt thet they should not prioritize the projects. She felt that the Metropolitan Council should welcome the Stubbs Bay project because of environmentai Issues. It was sioved by Jabbour, to direct staff to submit for approval the coMprehensive plan amendment extending the MUSA line to the Stubbs iay area first. There was not a second and the motion failed. Albln Nelson asked If the Metropolitan Council has the power to veto the profoct. He suggested that the Council do whatever they have to do to ensure the project will proceed. Moorse asked Cook for the deadline date to delete portions of the project from the base bid. Cook answered tha' the deadline is July I4th. Moorse directed him to extend that deadline fo' two weeks. He said the soonest the project could start would be july 23rd. Cook noted that the permit has not been issued from the PCA as they are awaiting approval from the Metropolitan Council. Pat Crane asked If the delay would be for the entire project or Just portions of it. Mayor Peterson noted it Is a delay for the entire project. Meoraa aald that this Issue is not holding up Council’s approval of the Cygnet Place and Leaf Street area in asaesssMnt proposal. iarrett eald that the contracts have been reviewed and are ready for eignature. Moerae eabed the Council to comment on the memo by Saffron on the 94/940 la9Ue. Oeettefi aald aha la waiting to hear what else is going to come from the Metropolitan Council. 9 iRr .. .. : .a-a.- .... ■'.V . •'ii.5f.'. ■i ■■} T^-^.-‘T -- - - - -■'^■ •»» MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13. 1992 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 64/640 - CONT. Qaffron notad that tha mamo is two weeks old and at that kima It intarpratad that thara would ba no flexibility with regards to this Issue. Ha stated that since then. It appears the»*e may ba soma flexibility. Ha said that the MetropolI tan Counci I would jitimately try to enforce the rule. Qoettensaid she would rather have the MetropoIitan Council address the Highway 12 Issue rather than this issue. All Members agreed that Gaffron did a great job on the memo regarding the 64/640 ruling. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT A) Qoetten stated that she feit tney did a terrific job at the Highway 12 public hearing meeting. ft) Jabbour stated he was unhappy with the Watershed District’s report. He thanked JoEllan Hurr for all the work she has done for the City. He noted the watershed District is unhappy that Orono has not done any planning since 198C, and stated they would like to see • Storm Water Management Plan. Cj Jabbour reported that he surveyed all public accesses on the Lake on July 4th and will present tha results to the Task Force. He noted that the LCMR has granted $944,000 to the DNR for lake accesses. 0) Jabbour suggested that Callahan and Qoetten review the pOiaiblilty of sharing services with other communities. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Qoetten, to volunteer Callahan and Qoeiten to review the issues of shared services with other communitIee. Mayor Peterson noted that she and Moorse had recently attended a meeting of the 14 iakeshore cities, where they discussed this Issue. She noted that for a small fee. cities can be included in a survey of services available. Jabbour said he does not wish to participate In a Task Force on this issue as it will only slow down the process. Mayor Peterson said that the survey will only provide Information, and each city will be on its own to contract in areas that they so desire. . V -T• - V •: -\ /f, ■'•■-.^ v; |yr^» r-«*. -T---,\--»wy; -. I ■r'ifclte ■\‘'s'>^' V ■■ r-■■.I'. W0i fc*'^ ■>! mu-r- "Si 'K ^•• MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD JULY 13, 1992 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. Qo*tt«n su99«st«d that they start initialiy discussed. by pursuing those cities Motion: Ayes 3, nays 0. E) Jibbour reported that Hurr has expressed a great appreciation end gratitude to Gaffron for ail regulation ordinance. He said he City's side. the Mork he did on the shoreiand was thankfui to have Hurr on the ENQINEER'8 REPORT There was no Engineer's report. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (•11) STATE FEE FOR TESTING DRINKING WATER - ORDINANCE #103. SECOND SERIES Hoorse explained that the Federal government has mandated additional water testing, so the State government is requesting additional funding from cities. Jabbouf suggested they send an explanation ^f the additional charge to residents with the billing. It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Qoetten, to adopt Ordiniwice si03, Second Series, adding the safe drinking water test I ng program fee ef feet l ve wl th the 1992 second quarter billing. Ayes 3, nays 0. (•12) PEOSSTRIAN CROSSING OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD NORTH Meorse explained that the cross walk is being proposed because children cross the road from the school to the day care center located In the church, and also a bike/hike trail will soon be located on the east side of the road and students will need a crossing to get from the school to the trail. Gerhardson noted the cost is approximately $200.00. It was sioved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to *9tabllSh a crosswallc on Old Crystal Bay Road 25’ north of the New Life Bible Church driveway, and direct the Public works Department to piece aignege as appropriate and annually or as needed and have a •tMidard crosswalk painted at that location. Ayes 3, nays 0. ' Jm if '1 ■A d Jm 4 •j . ;v'"n m ■Mi Ml % -j jjv MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL NCETINQHELD JULY 13, 1992 (•13) STUBBS BAY SEWER IMPROVEMENT - ASSESSMENT UPDATE Moortw •xplalned that this is the assessment role proposal for the Cysnet Place and Leaf Street areas. Mayor Peterson thonked Frank St. Lawrence, Dean Moline, and Gene OatenIng for all the work they did to ensure a resolve of tnis Issue. H was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt the role as presented for the Cygoet Place and Leaf Street areas. Ayes 3, nays 0. (•13A) STUBBS BAY SEWER IMPROVEMENT - UPDATE Hoorse said they would try to find a way to begin the project prior to July 23rd. 9 m.. ,.h Jsbbour noted that a special meeting could be called if necessary. Me auflfleated aettlne endorsement from the Environmental Committee of Lake Minnetonka on the project to submit to the Metropolitan CouncII. Moorae auBOested staff submit to the Metropol i tan Counci I a summary on the envlronmental Issues Involved w th the project. (014) BTUBB8 BAY Smil IMPROVEMENT - RESOLUTION i314l BOMB BALI Metropolitan Council before proceeding. ; .-jV ' • >.v Carolyn Orude euggaated establishing the date of the sale as August lOtli* She said this date wou.d be contingent upon approval of the projaot by the Metropolitan Council. Vf :: V 't m- |t% V-®il'¥ . Have aeoaaa funds, to use It for another project. mi Crude said it does not prohibit the City from doing that if one projact were aborted, but said the Federal government is not real •upportive of such act lore ae an original intent. Mm ■ dabbour asked If there were any bonds the City should retire m lieu of the financial market. ■■ '^v- - i '4 . ■ ■rh^^w^r/ ySis'S !'1l >« MfM'' .ll»* ‘"' fei'i I'5 .A'.' V.I #r'iS#"' \.r !%«■ w :'‘i^ -i- t. V'--^ '-■PW MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13. 1992 STUBBS BAY 8EWER - CONT. l4oorst ••!<! th# only bond with onough principal left would be the bond for tho Crystal Bay area, but that bond is not callable until B latar data. Oruda handad out a sheet which showed a one year history of bonds. Bha atatad that tha market is one that Is probably worth taking of. but not to Jeopardize the City’s readiness factor. Qfona askad If. by approving the sale of the bonds, the Council dOaMlttlng to any vested commission due. i s Oruda stated that fees incurred by her company are payable after tha bonds are sold and proceeds delivered. She said that there s no faa If the sale is aborted. The City may Incur a smal cost If tha data is postponed and the resolution needs to be revised. i:.o7u^ r «1nV >or r.r., ."''o satpiar project. Ayes 3, nays 0. (•18) CHANGE ORDER SI - LIFT STATION S9 Hoorsa axplalnad that this lift station has had many failures racantly and it was determined tha<- the contractor would need to Install by-pass pumps at an additional cost. It was Bwved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to authorize ^aafipa Order ''I to New Mach Companies. Inc. for an amount not to axedad aa.200.00. Ayas a. nays 0. (#1t) Iffl COMPREhcMBXVE ANNUAL REPORT nskad about tha news release about the financial reportlnp award• Mayor Paterson said the document would be discussed at a future meeting. (#17) SELECTION OF NAME FOR CITY HALL FRON'’^ASC ROAD II ifUg moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Jabbour, to select p^^Sway as a name for the frontage road serving the new City facllltlaa. Ayes 3. nays 0. .J f. HI T ‘ 'fi.*-"", % i‘~ ~ •i'- » 1: 4^ 'it:'-, ^"iv'^f > !• .::'VSTI,-:'; i- ‘^S; m <• •tf:W: I'V- ^P' ■S'., -f «■- T i# MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1992 (•ia) CITY FACILITIES BID AWARDS Jabbour said that major issues had never been budgeted for because of changes in standards that the City will be forced to deal He stated he would like to hold off on anything they do not need to purchase immediately. Qerhardson noted the bid awards are under the estimated budgeted amount. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to award following bids: t he FlOi sealer at PubIic Works to Technical Surfacing. Inc. for an amount of $8,850.00: Insulation of attic at City offices Insulation for an amount of $10,220.00; to C't/wide Ceramic to Dale Tile for an amount of $21,292.00; and St ructuraI and miseelIaneous steel erect'on to Ame r ec t for an amount of $15,145.00. Motion* Ayes 3, nays 0. (•19) FUEL STORAGE BID AWARD Moorse explained that staff has wetghed the cost o' g$Of>^ge versus below ground storage. He stated the storage leould cost approxImatety $17,000 more. above above ground ground Jabbour stated that he strongly feels the tanks should be above ground. Qoatten agreed with Jabbour for envlronmental reasons Cook felt the underground tanks were fine and stated there -ill always be some risk with the underground tanks. He stated that two- Ihlrds of all cities are still going with the underground tanas. Jabbour stated that »t used to be lOO* of the cities were using uitdarground tanks. He said he would like staff to revi»w insurance f0f> underground tanks and directed staff to project those figyrea out for a couple years. It was sieved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Jaboour. fuel storage bid award to allow staff to furmsr r#v Ayes 3, nays 0. to table the •w ? ne I ssue. if-r f,U •-« «“'■?•'./ .... ^ ■':/- Mini- : a«»: ■f ': • V;'^ \ » 'if «?'•.>r>:J;!%t '|- f,;i ti? r;- s« MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD JULY 13, 1992 (••20) STEPHEN WECAhAN r^ERFORMANCE REVIEW A SALARY ADJUSTMENT It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Goetten, to Increase Stephen Weckman to Level 6, Step 3 at an hourly rate of $13.00 to be effective July 20, 1992 with a recommended salary review scheduled for December 1993. Ayes 3, nays 0. (••21) SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION 1991 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT It was moved by Mayor Peter«on, seconded by Goetten, to approve the 1991 Summary Financial Report for publication. Ayes 3, nays 0. ATTORNEY’S REPORT There was no Attorney’s report. (••22) LICENSES It was moved ’ ' Mayor Peterson, seconded by Goetten. to approve a Special Events Permit for Rick Recker/St. George Church for the Corn Days Foot Race to be held August 9, 1992 from I2:i£*i;00 p.m. Ayes 3, nays o. (•23) BILLC Goetten asked why the City has a request for payment of fire service for 19B9, 1990 and I99i, Moorte said Maple Plain has Just sent the bill. Goetten said she hopes this practice will not be allowed in the future. It was mov*.d by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve payiaent of the All Funds Account. Ayes 3, nays 0. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Jabbour. seconded by Goetten, to adjourn the Orono City Council meeting at 8:45 p.m. Ayes 3, nays 0. 11 PI Sit'S':mm. 1 mx-y tt? &:.: ■ p;fi'? '*s¥ w i’^. -• % I’ sis- »^‘ fel€pw- >#S*’“mr- ■•a. I®-' ■'l|« • llcC fe' iit'm sm W^-«i A ^ it. :^m.s ;•_:; f 1. i;p>:?“'i4 |i& lifsiM. ■ »B-^v fei#’’ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CCUHCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1992 RECONVENED MEETING It Mtt mov«<J by Jabbour, secont^^d by Goatten, to reconvene the Orono City Council meeting at 8 1 p.m. on July 13, 1992. Ayes 3, nays 0. It MSf movi^d by Jab'oour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to establish a Dublic hearing to be held by the Planning Commission on August 3, 1992 at 7:u0 p.m. and a public hearing to be held by the Council on August 10, 1992 at 7:00 p.m. to review the Comprehensive Plan amendment for Stubbs Bay. Ayes 3, nays o. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Jabbour, seconoed by Goetten, to adjourn ♦he Orono City Council meeting at 8:56 p.m. Ayes 3, nays 0. Barbara A. Pet^rion, Mayor . Diar.n Go^t t^n, Actinq Mayor I I In, City Clerk -3 % - -'J ■'i .^5 ''i m '•‘'"■f'. V A.,.', if f- “i- > -‘ |.^ ’■' 'T Wi'l|i-' V r 4 ,v »»=■ A6KNDA von COOWCIL MBBTING SBT FOR MONDAY, JULY 13, 1992, 7:00 P.M. (•)Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon request. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. ROLL CALL 1. CONSENT AGENDA* APPROVAL OP NIMUTB8 * * 2. Regular Meeting of June 8, 1992 3. Regular Meeting of June 22, 1992 % PlAimiMG COMMISSION COMMBMTS - Candace Rowlette Representative Wo POBLIC COMMBMTS - (Limit 5 Minates Per Person) BOMIMG ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT **APPLICANTS** limnediately after the Council has reviewed your application please sign the three (3) original resolutions at the Recorder's desic* Applicants need not execute resolutions for subdivisions, vacations and denials. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. #1739 Albin Nelson, 500 Oxford Road - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution #1741 Rodney J. and Sharon K. Batzloff, 1115 Brown Rond South -* Variance - Resolution #1742 James and Amy Laing, 500 Orono Orchard Road - V. * .ance - Resolution #1743 Albert Hanser, 1685 Fox Street - Preliminary Subdivision * Resolution 1990-91-92 Commercial Marina License - Windward Marina Review Minnetrista Proposed Shoreland Ordinance Flexibility Net Council 64/640 - Analysis of Orono*s Current Situation MAYOR/COONCIL IMGINERR REPORT •to CITY AOKIVINTRATOR'S REPORT 11. State Fee for Testing Drinking Water - Ordinance Amendment 12. Pedestrian Crossing Old Crystal Bay Road North 13. Stubbs Bay Sewer Improvement - Assessment Update 13A. Stubbs Bay Sewer Improvement - Project Update 14. Stubbs Bay Sewer Improvement - Resolution Calling for the Sale of Bonds Change Order No. 1 - Lift Station No. 9 1991 Comprehencive Annual Report Selection of Name for City Hall Frontage Road City Facilities Bid Awards fuel Storage Bid Award Stephen Heckman Performance Review and Salary Adjustment 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21.Summary for Publication 1991 Comprehensive Annual fiFinancial Report w -^ '■■■%rOR COUNCIL MBBTING SBT FOR MONDAY, JULY 13, 1992, 7s00 P.M.; wl/cm ATToiwn's rkport ucnsis (22*) BILLS (23*) ADJOORHNIMT •: V INFORMATION ITEMS INCLUDED IN COUNCIL PACKET * - ^ i Piaancial R«port« Ravi««r 12-29-87 , - Niaiiahaha Cr««k Natarshad Dir rrict - TrunJc Highway 12 Corridor 7-2-92 Lak« Minnatonka Consarvation uiatrict Environment Committee 7-14-92 Laka Minnatonka Consarvation District Water Structures Committee 7-11-92 Nitttttas of the Regular Meeting of the Orono School Board 6-8-92 Planning Coanission Minutes 6-15-92 NWMITS 4.- 5 qpcdimo turn ai_ 07/01 - Lake use coamattM - Council Chambers r'::f!V .f ■ i?! 07/13 - Council Meeting 7 p.m. 07/20 - Planning Consdssion 7 p.m. oi/li - Council Meeting 7 p.m. 00/03 - Council work Session Preliminary *93 Budget 3 p.m. 00/10 - Council Meeting 7 p.m. 00/17 - Planning Commission 7 p.m. 00/24 - Council Meeting 7 p.m. . >>.-r mm <v!r.. ■ W- ■ t] 4 lit "D '/f i sitf itivvxi t#-t:fev'' M' 1:^ '-V- ^ -’ -s? - .‘. ■■f v-vl :-ii5 M** ■-S: i ;4 ■ , p:2>i''.' :pf.':, "ii- ?;,:5 w ■k - ;.* te :■ if ft ^ .ft . ■ ■' "fti **■ m' "mm.. p- ROLL MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINi/^^. ' HELD JUNE 8, 1992 V/>^ ^ ib#fThe Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Barbara Peterson, Counc i Imembers Gabriel Jc'bbour, J, DIann Goetten, Mary Butler and Edward Callahan. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, Building a Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Qaffron, Police Chief Stephen Sullivan, City Attorney Kevin Staunton, City Engineer Glenn Cook and City Recorder Teri Naab. Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.m. (S1) CONSENT AGENDA Goetten removed Item S2. Butler added Items #5, 6, 7, and 9 Mayor Peterson removed Item S2Z. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by But Agenda as amended. Ayes 5, nays 0. er, to approve the Consent Motions for all items adopted by consent agenda will in the minutes ‘r their respective numerical order. be incIu( d (•2) APPROVAL OF MINUTES Butler stated that lien is spelled wrong on Page 10. Goetten asked that the time of adjournment of the Executive Session be added to the minutes. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Goetten, to appiove the minutes Of the regular meeting of the Orono Council held on May i., 1992 as emended. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*•3) APPROVAL OF MNUTES It wee moved by Jaboour, seconded by Butler, to approve the minutes of the continued Public Hearing for the Stubbs Bay Sewer Assessment Hearing held on May ia, 1992. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#6) eiBTg WILLIAM HILLER. 2Bf1 CASCO POINT ROAD - VARIANCE William Miller was present. ? r % _ ^ i'i.''- ^:4f. PM'-'\ & liii- ^.-'Smi-■■icife. im E%m Ba.i- :Mk'- if I# ^■"11 :vv- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 8, 1992 ZONINQ FILE #1679 - CONT. Moors# explained that this Is a request for a hardcover variance to construct a 22’x26’ detached garage, replacing an existing garage, and for an after-the-fact variance for structural Improvements to a gazabo/bathhouse located within the 0-75’ setback area. Qoetten noted that even after the Stop work Order, construction continued on the gazebo. She was concerned about precedent setting with this Issue and reminded the Council of others with similar applications that had been denied. Miller stated that he had applied for a permit for the garage and during the process the Inspector noted the work being done to the gazebo. He said he was unaware of Orono’s restrictions on hardcover. He added that after the Inspector had asked him to stop work on the structure, very high winds threatened to knock down the structure so some of the siding was added to the structure to prevent this. He said he did not continue work on the decking or stalrway. Qoetten asked Miller if he called this need to continue work. the Inspector to notify him of Hiller said he had not caMed the City office. Qoetten said she was glad that the Council application back to the Planning Commission figures had changed since that review. had referred the as the hardcover Miller explained that he was originally using a survey from 1968, which was determined to be incorrect. goettten pointed out that Is the reason for asking for comprehensIve review of the entire property. Jabbour reviewed that the structure serves as access to the lake and the applicant is entitled to a stairway to the lake. He had no problem with agreeing with the Planning Commission recommendat I on on the gazebo. He said he has a problem with people feeling that since a non-conforming structure Is existing, they have a right to maintain that structure forever. He asked •teff If the applicant would be paying the appropriate after-the- fact fees. Mabwith concurred that the additional fee# would be charged for the gazebo portion of the project. k 'a' ' . r.T®” .“v 1 ■. ,.•; tSs*es" W - t' '';'a- tr-t’ -■«■ I»: -■'- f, -1 P ' MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 8, 1992 ZONING FILE #1679 - CONT. It was moved by B'Jtler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve the varIance repues t tor Application #1679 for Willi am Miller of 2€91 Casco Point Road, and directed staff to draft the appropriate resolution. Ayes 5, nays 0. (M5) #1724 TAMMY L. WOOOIS, 2t18 CASCO POINT ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE - RESOLUTION S3129 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to adopt Resolution #3128 for AppI I cat Ion #1 724 for Tammy Woodis of 2819 Casco Point Road, approving a conditional use permit and variance for the construction of a pool on a through lot. Ayes 5, nays 0. («t0) #1729 CLAIR ROOD, 3280 NAVARRE LANE - SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT RESOLUTION #3128 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, tc adopt Resolution •3128 for Application #1729 for Clair Rood, 3280 Navarre Lane, for a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement. Ayes 5, nays 0. (•87) 81731 CLAIR ROOD, 2216 KENirOOO WAY - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3130 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to adopt Resolution #3130 for Application #1731, Clair Rood of 2215 Kenwood Way, approving a variance to construct fencing. Ayes 5, nays 0. (88) 81734 JOHN BURGER, 3760 8AY8IDE ROAD - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION #3131 John Burger was present. Moorsa explained that this is a two lot subdivision application. Out lot A wlH be special 1y combined with Lot 1 for area credit. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the appiI cat Ion. Qoetten asked If both lots have adequate septic sites. Mabusth confirmed that they do and added that Lot 2 is included in the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project area. ■>i if'tH- "' -^';t m-' • •;Tm-m^- lA-Sy ■V ■■ ■■:'■ - i . -.• 5:^- i..r .^- ?■-. ;•• ■■ 0- ' Ifit'' r--'t. ;■' F..fe-HxsZy'Mm-,. si- t:fS; P- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 8, 1992 ZONING FILE §1734 - CONT. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3131 for Application #1734 for John Burger of 3750 Bayside Road, for preliminary subdivision approval. A/es 5, nays 0. Butler noted that in the letter from SP-Testing, Inc . a mercury float It recommended. She asked about the safety factor of such a dev Ice. Gaffron stated that they have not had any problems with tnis device and It Is very similar to what is used in a furnace thermostat. (••9) #173® GREGORY C. PETERSON, 1920 SHORELINE DRIVE - RENEWAL VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3132 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to adopt Resolution •3132 for Application #1736, Gregory C. Peterson of 1920 Shoreline Drive, approving a renewal variance for the construction of a new residence. Ayes 5, nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Mayor Peterson announced to the residents in attendance that there would not be public discussion regarding the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project, and this item would only be discussed during Executive Session. A) Butler read aloud an advertisement from the Wayzata Weekly Newspaper which advertised male and female dancers on the Miss Deduction charter boat. She suggested they bring this to the attention of the LMCO. B) Butlsr referred to a letter sent to the Council Members from Mr. FIck In which he expressed his concern that the City had not completed Its shoreland regulations. She said she called him to report that Orono Is one of two cities who has submitted their new regulations. She noted the response she received from him was very patron 17ing. 1 -•i 4 ■ s.fw,' •:'■. \m->‘ • '■• ', V. -N m-■■:> HINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORCNO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 8, 992 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. C) Janbour reported that he, Mayor Peterson, Callahan and JoEllen Hurr mat with the DNR to discuss potential public access sites. He said they mentioned to the DNR that Orono’s relationship with them goes beyond one public access. He said that Orono and Minnetrlsia were the first cities to adopt wetland philosophies. He told the DNR that the City looks forward to the DNR’s input on the ram IfIca^Ions of improving the existing Highway 12 corridor through Orono, specifically, the impact of the southern alignment on the Luce Lir.e Trail. D) Jabbour reported that the suD-committee to the LMCD’s Task Force will meet on June 10th and he will oe in attendance. E) Jabbour announced that last week an issue was brought up regarding his participat•on in marina issues. He sa*d he is a marina owner, and would therefore step aside during dscussions of marinas. He stated that hi? concerns aoout mar.nas would not subside. He noted that the City A^^torney had opmed that Jabbour does not have a conflict of interest in mis area. Butler said she would hate to this issue. see him withdraw from discussion on Callahan felt that it was essential that he continue on Use Committee, and stated that if Jabbour is satisfied solution that would be fine with him. the Lake with the F) Callahan referred to a letter from the LMCD which alludes to a Joint effort of the LMCD and the DNR to submit a grant application for land acquisition. He thought there was a Committee established to determine the best site and asked why the grant application at this time. Jabbour reported that the study by the Committee did not move In an appropriate manner which was time-wise appropriate for the grant application. He understood that the LCMR was less likely to consider award of grant money without a specific or approximate site. Moorse explained that the grant application includes only one specific site, and the remainder of the money is to be used In general for sites on Lake Minnetonka. .- ~zr^ Iv:- III i:m ’% '’I ¥#i‘ W f - M 0 ,jvn; ' ^:*. ?:■■ ?¥=i = f-W : ■ 4 1 m,::M minutes of the regular orono council meetingHELD JUNE 8, 1992(#10) BID AWARD LIFT STATION 99 RENOVATION Moortt txplalned that this Is a bid award for Lift Station S9. Butlar asked where this Lift Station is iocated. Qerhardson reported that Lift Station is iocated on Bohns Point. Butler asked how old the current Lift Station is. Qerhardson said It was placed in service somewhere between 1965 and 1970. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by But'er, to award the bid for Lift Station #9 restoration to NewMech Comoanies, Inc. for an amount of $46,800.00. Ayes 5, nays 0. (ill) BIO AWARD 1992 SEAL COAT PROJECT Mayor Peterson asked if this item fails within a budgeted amount. Qerhardson said it does. be included in theButler asked what portion of streets would project. Qerhardson reported that the streets that were paved In 1391 would be seal coated this year. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to award the bid tor the 1992 Seal Coat Project to Omann Brothers for an amount of $9,174.40. Ayes 5. nays 0. (•12) AWARD OF BIDS FOR STUBBS BAY SEWER PROJECT Moorse explained this Is an award of bids for Stubbs Bay Sewer Project. He noted the final date for appeals Is June 18th, and they have a good Idea at present of how many appeals they can expect. He sussested awarding the bids that evening in order to proceed with the project. Jabbour asked if ll would still be possible to remove an area from the project If the bid is awarded. Noorse Indicated that would be part of an agreement that was discussed with the contractor. He noted that as part of this approval, the entire contract would be approved with the condition that the City has the option o' deleting any portion of the project outside the base area within a certain time period. ■1^ f-. cz 'V ^im '1 ■ »■"*V5vVi.-. jP" ilf I#?, ■ . *• i; MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD JUNE 8, 1992 AWARD OF BIDS FOR STUBBS BAY SEWER PROJECT - CONT. Staunton askad If thera were provisions in the bid to do the altarnativa portions separately. Cook stated that was not Included in the bid. Butler asked If staff felt confident that Ian9uage could be Incorporated with the bid award that would assure the City the right to delete a portion of the bid at a future date. She thought they should wait the 30 days. Goetten asked what Is the expected completion date. Cook reported that they would not be able to start for about 1 weeks and completion is expected approximately November 1st. 1/2 Staunton stated they would need to draft language for the agreement on which both parties would agree. He did not feel that would be a problem. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Callahan, to award the bids for the Stubbs Bay sewer project reserving the right to delete any portion of the project at the original bid amount for a period of 30 days from the date of expiration of the appeal period, subject to the agreement addressing all of Council’s conceriis. Jabbour withdrew his motion. It was movad by Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to award the bid for the Stubbs Bay sewer project reserving the right to delete any portion of the project at the original bid amount for a period of 30 days from the date of expiration of the appeal period, subject to the agreement addressing ail of Council’s concerns, m the following amounts: Base Area Alternate Site 1 Alternate Site 2 Alternate Site 3 At ternate Site 5 $602,913.00 152,152.20 30,621.25 381.671.75 112.973.75 Total Contract Amount $1,480,331.95 Ayes 5, nays 0. ■m■t 4 Uv:- : fe. i:r.‘ -.4^ •w:,-. [if li ?^c S;.J .A i;i:: m ■ .A .f ■■fA- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 8, 1992 (•13) PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF LEAF STREET - RESOLUTION #3133 Moors4 «xplaln6d this is a request for authorization fronn Council to move ahead in the preoaration of plans specifications for reconstruction of Leaf Street. the and Cook explained that the portion ot Leaf Street reconstruction will be removed from the sewer bid and constructed with MSA funds. He noted they are looking at a couple of options, an urban/rural section or a total rural section. The street would be approximately 32’ when finished. Butler asked how wide the road is currently. Cook said it is 21-22’, with the shoulder areas in lieu of curb and gutter. He noted the shouIder-to-shou»der width of the road is 28*. He added the reconstruction would involve Leaf Street from County Road 84 to Watertown Road. Butler reported that MSA funds can only be used :f the road connects to another MSA street or state Highway. Cook noted that the sewer construction will impact the vegetation In the area more than the street reconstruct Ion. Jabbour asked the width of the existing right-of-way. Cook said the right-of-way is 66’ wide. Jabbour stated that ao one wants to encourage ths widening of a roadway. Me asked Cook what the residents in the area would be saving by using MSA funds. Cook explained there is an approx'mate $100,00 difference. He noted the road constructed to msa standards would cost more because of the additional amenities. He indicated that the City could apply for a variance to the read standards that would allow construction at a 28’ wioth. Butlar ffIt they should apply for the variance. She asked if they would be able to oox the sewer construction to stay within tne r!ght-of-way. Cook noted they would be using this method as often as possible. Coetten said she assumed this project would be done m a timely manner. 8 ) - : t •r.:|;.’ I t| W MW m ;V: V k-j'- |K iftwkk- mMll? p tew pli^ |P4P%- ffflfwc ,il:'tew"«tell'"Iff"'fc'' r^i^ . .{■!• .i,‘-w - ite'":K5;.vm; mkfkm:k- ...ill' Hilir ^r'■!=£=' .llli.\mmL ’■•f —\ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 8, 1992 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS - LEAF STREET - CONT. Cook not*d this projact would be coordinated with the sewer project. He felt that the wider road would not increase the speed levels on the roadway, but would only make the road safer. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Sutler, to direct the City Engineer to prepare plans and spec 1ffcations for the reconstructI on of Leaf Street, and to consider the variance request to allow the street to be constructed at a 28’ width. Cole Graham, 95 Leaf Street, asked if the residents of the area would be notified of the public hearing regarding this issue. Mayor Pet&rson saici they v#ou l d be notified at the appropriate time. Jabbour asked the residents if they would prefer to pay for the road reconstruction themselves. Jane Behrman, 340 Leaf Street, said she had a petition to hand in With 100% opposition of the reconstruction project to widen the road. She stated that she did not wish the City to apply for the MSA funds. She said she was told by the City Admintstrator that State funds could not be used for the sewer project. Mayor Peterson said the Counci I understands t h i s pos i t i on, but tht^y must review all options. Bob Minkema, 3200 Baysido Road, stated that they have already been informed of what their assessment will be for the sewer project. He did not see any benefit to using MSA funds which would widen the roadway and in effect create a high speed roadway. He said he did not want the road to become a short-cut and was concerned for the safety of the children in the area. Goetten said she thought the residents were concerned about having the lowest assessment possible for the sewer project. She said the Council has tried to find all possible ways to reduce this amount. Behrman stated they do not want the assessment lowered at the expense of the beauty of the street. Qrahaai asked when they could expect the results of the plans and spec Ificat Ions. Cook said It would take about one month to prepare. 'm v>,jpS#:V:vliSWm wm % fSs ■■■v;.ry S- ^ ;'c .' MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORCNO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 8. 1992 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS - LEAF STREET - CONT. Qerhardson notad they do not have to have a public hear my for the project, and suggested a public meeting instead. He indicated that the road could be staked to allow the residents to visualize the affect on their properties. Jabbour asked what the City’s chances were for the variance request. Cook felt that they had a 90% chance of approval. He noted that current City standards require a rural roadway to be paved at a 24’ width with 3’ shoulders, or a paved area of 28’ with curb and gutter. He noted the disadvantage of Leaf Street is that it is so straight. Qoetten asked the speed limit of the road. Qerhardson said It is 30 MPH. Jabbour asked when the road is reconstructed, if it has to follow current standards. Cook reported that the City allows replacement in kind. Jabbour suggested staking the street at the minimum the City would allow and the width of a MSA road. Ooattan suggested that the Police Department patrol the area more. Pat Crane stated he signed the petition based on information that ha was unsure about, but through the discussion his questions have been answered. He felt the difference in the paved area was Insignificant and stated he would rather save the money on the assessment. C.C. Qraham, §5 Leaf Street, felt that the widening of the road would change the character of the area. She requested that the Council approach this Issue with great caution. BrIanEhait, 140 Leaf Street, noted he has small children, but does not allow them to ride on the road currently. He noted the difference between a 2S* road and a 32’ road may destroy pine trees on his property. Behrman asked why Leaf Street was the only street singled out. iiliia..., i iv ■ ■ -.r, 'i-'”' ■■■•••: T»>^'‘ ■- I- j* u-y I'’"'- , ■T^vi' V 1 ■ *■ >■■ t ■ fr-'' pi ■mm l.;l:, ■' •' ^^av! ill p' ■4^ :ii' ; fctt- te"iv' ■-< lira '■;■■•>.•. ■ M;e: ilil;'Imm- a.'- t ii ;S|isi.!i; MINUTkS OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS - LEAF STREET - CONT. 6uti«r rtmlnded her that in order to be a MSA street, it must connect with another MSA street at each end. Cook noted that Cygnet Place probably would not meet the criteria for a MSA street because of the vertical alignment. Ehalt ask9d if the hill on Leaf Street would be changed. Cook said it may be changed slightly. 01 Me Peterson, 475 Oxford Road, said che travels the road often and felt it would be safer at a wider width. Qoetten asked if a fog line could be added to the side of tne road for bikers. Ehalt felt that would take away from the •'ural character. Mayor Peterson asked if brush and shrubs are removed from private prooerty during the project, if they would be replaced by the City. Gerhardson said that would be a possibility. Motion: Ayes 5, nays 0. Jabbour suggested they stake the area of the sewer project also. (•14) USE OF COBG FUNDS FOR STUBBS BAY SEWER SERVICE CONNECTION COSTS Moors* explained that he has discussed this issue with Larry Biacksted from the County who has indicated that the funds can be used in two ways: 1. Using the money for the actual assessment, wnich would require an entire area to qualify for the use of the funds. He noted that the dollar amount allocated to the City woul-< only pay for a couple property assessments. 2. Using the funds for the cost of the sewer connection from the lateral to the residence. He noted that staff recommends the ^econd alternative. He said that Council should determine if ey wish to use 1992 or 1993 funds or both. 4 ■■■}. ji *;. -'i ■' c ■ ■„. . . . . . . ..,v^; ■1^■ ^ . -= M: uy ■'.* • I' ' ^ ■1"*m: ; i.'' % w ■ '' - - ‘'Vt , ■^‘•iv 'Vi '*“ i'-rf' ''P- ■yyy ■’ ^'''«vfel-^'': , ‘ 3 ^ ^■f:«: MINUTES OF THE REGULAR '"f’ONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD JUNE V, 1992 CDBG FUNDS * CONT. jAbbour felt that since the Council has allocated a portion of the 1992 funds to home improvement, they could use that amount for the sewer project. Qoetten felt that if there are people in need of the funds for Other Improvements, they should not be denied. Moorse said that the County is currently accepting appiIcations for the funds for 1992. But 1er noted the sewer wl 1 i not be ready for connection untI I 1993. Qsrhardson indicated that the City has l 1/2 years to expend the money. Qoetten felt that since the money won’t be needed until 1993, they should not use 1992 funds. Jsbbour disagreed and feit that the properties on Lake St'^eet and next to the public landing are in great need of the sewer and felt that the City should encourage immediate hookup. Qsrhardson reported that the 1993 funds will be avai lable as of July 1993. JSbbour withdrew his objection. All Members agreed that they would not use the 1992 CDBG funds for the Stubbs Bay Sewer service connection costs. (•15) AWARD OF BIDS FOR PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY EQUIPMENT Moorse explained that the hoist is the number one priority to award as It needs to be installed early in the project. He added that there are Items in the service equipment section that should be Installed within the early portion of the project. He stated they would continue to review the fuel distribution system, and the overhead cranes do not fit Into the budget. Jabbour asked If the amount listed for the fuel distribution system was correct. Moorse stated that is the bid price, which also Included a number Of other items. "1.1 I 1 •.v: A '■•; ■ . . . . . . . . . .. . .*•"pr"l.\ '- A m. IK:gm 4: ^;*wv; m ii..' '-' "'‘4* f*-=•• ^ n •« :■& ft " '• fe y ^ ''X %f. 'ifi ■■ ■ -~' "'■r- ^ /:• :.-J A ■• V ■M -> 0 !•''. ■ m ^VK't ft •.*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD JUNE 8, 1992CDBQ FUNDS - CONT. Jabbour fait that since the Council has allocated a portion of 1992 funds to home improvement, they could use that amount for sewer project. the tne Qoetten ♦elt that If there are people in need of the funds other Improvements, they should not be denied. for Moorse said that the County Is currently accepting appi icatlons for the funds for 1992. But Ier noted the sewer will not be ready for connect ion until 1993. Qerha dson Indicated that the City has l 1/2 years to expend the money. Qoetten felt that since the money won’t be needed until 1993, they should not use 1992 funds. Jabbour disagreed and felt that the properties on Lake Street and next to the public landing are In great need of the sewer and felt that the City should encourage immediate hookup. Qsrhardson reported that the 1993 funds July 1993. I I be avaliable as of Jabbour withdrew his objection. All Members agreed that they would not use the 1992 COBG funds for the Stubbs Bay Sewer service connection costs. (#16) AWARD OF BIDS FOR PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY EQUIPMENT overhead cranes do not fit into the budget. Jabbour asked If the amount listed for the fuel distribution system was correct. Moorse stated that of other items. Is the bid price, which also Included a number 9 Vr >v. r : '4/-. i I i i > i M mik jtes of the regular orono council meetingHELD JUNE 8, 1992(*♦19) 1992 POLICE LIEUTENANT CONTRACT SETTLEMENT » ... n-r. iK f ‘im (.,i5sw^ .i-vi- III . nays 0. (#20) ATTORNEY'S REPORT - EXECUTIVE SESSION It was movsd *>y Butler, seconded by Goetten. to adjourn the regular JouncIlTeetlng at 8:45 p.m. to Executive Session. Ayes 5. nays 0. (*♦21) LICENSES It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to approve the following licenses: Kennel cense ~ ResJlent I all Stephen Q. Esco, 230 Big Island Rodney Crawford, 4705 North Shore Drive Garbage S Refuse CoHectQ..ri Mestonka Sanitation Motion, Ayes 5, nays 0. fMp9\ bills Mayor Peterson questioned the amount to Strgar Roscoe Fausch. Moorse stated he would check into it. It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Qo«tten, payment of the All Fund* Account, as revised. Ayes 5, nays o. Butler asked Chief Sullivan about an accident on County Road 15 on the previous Friday. 8ulllv«n rtportad that two ear* war* faval Ing waatbound, on* triad to p*»* OR th* right and was hit by a ear merging from a aid* Street. Three people were hosp’talI zed. Jabbour announced thr.t Sullivan would be In jail on June 22. Sullivan clarified that he was being Jal led by Chapter of the American Cancer Society to raise fund* througn bail. Callahan asked If there was an unpaInted patrol car In Spring Park. Sullivan noted they are waiting for t^se striping. 14 iliifeiia ■‘X' B " • T‘MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD JUNE 6, 1992AOJOURNHENTIt was moved by Butler* seconded by Jabbour, to adjourn Executive Session of the Council at 9:45 p.m.the Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST; Dorothy M. Hal I in, City Clerk ‘■X. ^r%' 5, *#•»> ^ 5f» "■ ' fKi: :-A '■ tr jf- ’y>m ^ i-i* h:;R !>■:•; .• ^>1 • • ■< j-"'-!4 wmm 15 ■-.v. if; m jyk... fcj; ■ A r jQi .tij. «r. J.*ii ■ -wiiim 4 #1m■"§'4 ) 7? ■ - :#'• y N'« j - ii ‘X:- % ■0^ :-i ¥:';| , -?■■•.'/,■" ■ wem9^" ' i" : ' ;V v;. ■'-■.■ r-v-' ft.m- l¥4' §4>r ill : I'- t. -flf- NIS;, :>?/ 1^' . :■:-■■■ ■■' . . -v^’V^“ » Wf-p'ii, ti M. ■4 ■4 MINUTFS of theHELD jREGULAR ORONO COUNCIL l(|STIw4 * LD JUNE 22.1992 %»4iROLLiiiAt on the above date with the foMowIng members M* Mftwnr Barbara Peterson, CouncIImembers Gabriel Jabbour, Ed-ara Callahan. Tha following city staff: a tyAdm Ron Moors., Public Works Dlr.ctor John O.rhardson, Building a Zoning Administrator lAAMftA Mahuath Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Mlcha.l aZmSh^Pol^c/chl.f Sul^llvan City *ttorn.y Tom Barratt. City Engineer Glenn Cook and City Recorder Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:10 P.M. (•1) CONSENT AGENDA Jebbour removed Item #5. Sutler removed I tom #2. It was moved by Jabbour. seconded by Goetten, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 5, nays 0. Motions for all I terns adopted by consent agenda wlI 1 be Included In the minutes In their respective numerical order. (•2) APPROVAL OF MINUTES Butler stated she did not rece ve Page 3 of the minutes. Tt moved bv Butler, seconied by Mayor Peterson, to table ippPoVal^hJ mlnutas of th. r.gula- .f^av^Thold on May 11, 1992 until Paga 3 Is Includad. Ayas S. nays 0. PUBLIC COMMENTS • Uind. McOlhty. raprasantatlv. for reouested the Council consider a joint meeting to proposed arena site. Mayor Patarson notad that Moorsa would contact tha approprlato organizations of the joint meeting. Callahan felt that a joint meeting of at I organi zat ions would prove to be counter productive. Ooetten suggested that the Council and Planning C discuss the issue. •lii li ission meet to •V.' ! . :• 3 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD JUNE 22, 1992 M is#' W liSS^ |:te H ':p' , ffS- .ai. iii' ^4»'^ ■f Jifj plte (••3) *1679 WILLIAM MILLER.2691 CASCO POINT ROAD - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3134 It WAS iflovsd by Jabbour, sacondad by Goattan, to adopt Rasolutlon •3134 for AppI Icatlon #1679 for Wl I Mam MM lar of 2691 Casco Point Road, approving varlancas to parmit tha structural repair of a gazabo/bathhousa structura and tha proposed construction of a datachad garaga. Ayas 5, nays 0. (#4) #1706 WILLIAM KNAPP, 4900 BAY8I0C ROAD - Pm>/8Ui01V18ICN - REQUEST TO NAME PRIVATE ROAD It was aiovad by Mayor Patarson. sacondad by Goattan. to approva tha naiaa Crlatoforl Circia for tha privata road within tha Cristoforl Wooda plat. Ayas 5. nays 0. (#8) 81732 JOAN SWEETSER, •48 OLD LONG LAKE ROAD - FINAL SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION #3135 Joan Swaatsar was pratant. Sha axplained that tha assassad valua for tha 9 acre parcal was $94,300 for 1992, and tha 7 acra parcal baing dividad off is now baing assassad at approximately $105,000. Sha also notad the Park Commission Is requesting a 619' bike traiI aasamant along the property line. Carhardson axpia nad that the bike easement will be taken over tha existing drainage aasamant, as was dona with tha Shadowood Plat. Jabbour fait that tha impact of having bikers going over her land it different than tha impact of a drainage easement. Mayor Pataraon clarified that this may not aver be used as a bike traiI. Qarhardson concurred and axplained that this area is Included as part of a comprahansiva bike trail system. Caiiahan felt tha value of the aasamant should be reduced from tha land valuation. Jabbour pointed out that tha ordinance does state that they are allowed to request 8X of tha fair market value, which may not be tha same as tha asrassad valuation for iha property. Callahan asked if Swaatsar hes property. a purchase agraamant for tha 4 [Ifcfe, ■■ ■■■': tm MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD JUNE 22, 1992iii'V * ; 1i^fc: r I m:;;t:t pit-/ liW- B0r . ftK: «|t. Ip-"i&-: ZONING FILE ilTaZ - CONT.8M««ts0r said -he does and the selling price Is higher than the valuation set by the assessor.Mayor Peterson suggested that the buyer be made aware of the bike easement. Callahan auggested amending the resolution to reflect credit for the bike easement If the Park Commission determines that they still want the easement. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution •3135 for Application #1732 for Joan Sweetser, 845 Old Long Lake Road, subject to the resolution being amended to reflect the credit for the bike easement If it is determined by the Park Commission that they still desire the easement. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#6) i1739 ALBIN NELSON, 500 OXFORD ROAn CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Moorse explained this Is an application to allow replacement of a retaining wail system. Jabbour asked If the retaining wall would impact the sewer Hnes. Cook confirmed there would not be an Impact. Cal I ahan quest I oned the approval by the applicant *s engineer of the materials to be used for construction. Mabusth indicated that the resolution has been drafted such that approval of the materials must be approved by the City Engineer. jgutler expressed concern about the number of trees to be removed and asked If there Is a plan to re-established the forestation. Mabusth said she was not aware of such a plan. It was sieved by Goetten, seconded by Callahan, to table Application Pf73f for Albln Nelson, 500 Oxford Road, until the applicant provides the City with a plan for replanting the trees to be resioved during construction. Ayes 5, nays 0. .5 r.' i -.r V •,<: mm L t ‘-r ■: 5 [Iy% lyri^ri- prk P.^- ^';V■L-;. t - ■■> r PtP^- pp#pi;r 'm$-WA X MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 22, 1992 (M7) 1740 STEPHEN HARRIS, JR50 WATERTOWN ROAD - RENEWAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION §313« It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution •3136 for ApplIcatlon #1740, Stephen Harris of 3850 Watertown Road, approvin9 a renewal conditional use permit required for land •Iterations In excess of 100 cubic yards. Ayes 5, nays 0. HAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT A) Goetten indicated the newspapers have published an article which may have confused residents about the Pub Iic Hearing to be held by MnOot. She noted that meeting is to be held on June 30th. She noted that the Pioneer newspaper also printed an article Indicating that MnDot has approved a plan approving the southern corridor as It Is the best as far as env I ronmental concerns are concerns. She added this position came from a news release from Long Lake and had nothing to do with a decision by MnOot. Jabbour suggested that the City send a notice to residents of the public hearing to be held by MnOot. B) Jabbour stated he has received calls from residents on Cygnet Place regarding the staff decision on the assessment. He indiccted to the residents thst the majority of the Council wes not concerned •bout percentages, but rather what a court of law w'^uld find to be •ppropr I ate charges for the sewer. He was concerned net a deadline has not been Identified. He said at the last Council meeting he pushed for the usage of msa funds for Leaf Street, and thought the isoney would be rebated. He thought tne money may be used to off sat the trunk charges for Cygnet Place If they opt not to Join the project. He felt the Council should meet prior to final date for abatements. Mayor Peterson noted that many residents believe that if MSA funds are used to restore Leaf Street, that money will be used to reduce the assessment. She felt they need to have an understand Ing of the Issue In writing. Goetten stated the Council has gone over-board to reach a fair settlement and the residents should understand fully that a future Council Is In no way bound to participate in future sewer extension should these areas opt not to Join In the project at this tloie. Jabbour noted that some of the residents on working hard to come to a resolve of the issue. Cygnet Place are » m' ‘=-.' I?- Ih. I' i’-' - '• V..:-v a 'f\ i'l’i §r i»‘';i4-,' MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 22, 1992 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. CallAhan roQUAStod th® issua be discussed in executive session. C) Jibbour reported that he and Callahan had met with Moorse, the architect and builder to discuss the concerns and progress of ths City facilities. Ho said that logical and reasonable explanation given to concerns expressed at the Planning Commission meeting. He said that the Construction Manager spoke very highly of the Building Inspectors. D) Jabbour reported there was a meeting of the LMCD Task Force. He said they are dlvers'ng from the standards for car/trallor parking. He reported that the Task Fore* is also looking at creative parking, off-street perking to ne reduced to 40’, Innovative ways for compact ca- parking, and launches for watercraft without trailers. He noted they are also looking at ways to reconf Iguro al • landings to get the maximum capacity allowed. He said he has volunteered to an aerial survey on July 4th of the Lake. E) Callahan reported that the ordinance banning styrofoam docks to be published and reviewed by the Planning Commission prior to Council adoption. He stated because of newspaper deadline dates, the Council will not be able to act on the ordinance for 60 days. He suggested they have a alternative system to decrease publication dates. ENQINCER'S REPORT Cook explained that the 199l Transportat Ion Act has changed funding for highways. He said that Hennepin County Is requesting approval of a plan approving federal funding for County Roads 6 and 15. He noted the funding may be used for reconstruct ion or safety Improvements to the roadways. Qoetten reminded him that County Road 15 Is a scenic parkway. She stated that because of envlronmentai concerns for the Lake, Orono did not want County Road 15 to ever be upgraded. Jabbour stated that a roadway could not bo improved without City approval, no matter how it it funded. Butler did not agree with Jabbour's statement. i- f'" ^,’v V f ■ ,. .* . "' i.. . (in>; '■■ ■ • ■’*.■ ::,■ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO ( DUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 22. 1992 ENGINEER'S REPORT - CONT. Cook f«lt that this would b# the time to send a message to the County regarding the City’s concerns about County Road 15. He said that If the County does not receive a response by June 30th, they will consider It approval by default. It was moved by Jabbour. to approve the plan submitted by Heru County for roAds b6 Includod for f6d0ral fund-no, with exclusion of Couni r^oad 1 There was no second. n Che Hoorse explained t. t it Is planned that the County will present a safety Improvement plan at the next Council meeting. Butler said they should report to the County that they cannot make a decision until a later date. All Members agreed. CITY AOMIMISTRATOR'S REPORT (SiB) FINAL PAYMENTS ON COUNTY ROAD 15 STREET S LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS It was moved by Jabbour, seconded Goetten, to approve payment of City of Orono’s share of final costs for joint project with Hennepin County for the County Road 15 street right-of-way coats In the amount of $103,996.65 street lighting cost of $4,347.35, and street Improvement cc^ts of $63,243.95; and appropriat Ing $66,2A0.60 from the P.I.R. road ai.a Bridge Account and $4,347.25 from the P.I.R. General Account. Ayes S, nays 0. ($9) LMCO PROPOSED 1993 ANNUAL BOwGET JoEllen Hurr was present. She announced the r will be held Wednesday. June 24th. The Board wi i i w request for a Joint dock for Big Island Inc. Board meeting reviewing the Mabusth explained that the Council has approved a conditional use permit for the property, but the City has not yet received a dock license appllcarion. She suggested that the LMCO should not act on the request until the City is m receipt of the application. jrr reported that on June 25th. the revised Legislative Commission of Minnesota Resources will hold a hearing on fund .ig for accesses on Lake Minnetonka. *^•^0 h tnr" 5* mn i '0:‘" ‘N; =/l ■■ rl- .«;y- ^H;Lr i'' t' H kt t:.'^ A ■■• '- t iJ'' 1. '■'-r ■ ■'t' • t. V MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 22, 1992 LMCD PROPOSED 1993 ANNUAL BUDGET - CONT. Murr reviewed th« proposed budget and noted the decrease In Orono's Ahare. Jabbour said he appreciated all the Mork by Scott and JoEllen on the budget. He felt that the LMCD may be relying too strongly on license and permit fees, which may be argued In court. Butler said for years the City has argued that the LMCD should rely more on user fees. Jabbour expressed his concern that Orono Is not benefitting from the LMCD as m. .h as other communities. Hurr noted that Orono does not have public docks ..nd probably does not benefit the same as other communities. Jabbour stated that the LMCD needs to demonstrate the value they are to communities. Hurr reiterated tnai .t all the cities arounr the Lake were as restrictive as Orono, there wouldn’t be a need lOr the LMCD. (#10) SELECTION OF NAME FOR HIGHWAY 12 '’RONTAGE ROAD It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Qoetten, to establish the name for the Highway 12 Frontage Road as ”Les Kelley Memorial Drive”* subject to approval by the family. Ayes 5, nays 0. (•11) CITY HALL i PUBLIC tIORKS BUILDINGS APPLICATION 4 CERTIFICATE OF PAYMENT 94 It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve City Hall and Public Works Buildings Architect's Application and Certificate for Payment #4 as presented. Ayes 5. nay 0. (•12) WINDWARD MARINA - RECRiEST FOR 1991 LICENSE FEE REDUCTION Qaffron explained that Mr. Rivers has requested a reduction In the 1991 license fees In order to make his fee equitable with the two other marinas who were granted concessions in 1990. He is also requesting the Council waive the $50.00 late fee for the 1992 appiI cat Ion. Butler said that the fact the Council in the past has g'-anted concessions to other marinas indicates their willingness to be fair. She felt Mr. Rivers should only pay the $200.00 for the 1991 11 cense. ■ i... ...a: MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD JUNE 22, 1992WZNOirARO MARINA > REQUEST FOR 1991 LICENSE FEE REDUCTION - CONT.Callahan said that avary tima tha Council trias to start fresh with ragards to Iicensing marinas, thay have dI fficulty as to where they should start. Ha thought tha Council had dec I dad at a pravlous maatlng that all marinas would pay their 1991 and 1992 license faas, regardless of past decisions. Ha said that Rivers appeared before tha Lake Use Commlttaa stating he felt he had not received an answer to this request. Mayor Paterson agreed with Callahan. Goattan felt that thay should waive the late fee. Rivers said ha was Just asking for equal treatment. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Mayor *»eterson, to direct staff to inform Mr. Rivers to pay the full amount for license fees owned for 1991 and 1992. Ayes 3, nays 1. Butler voted nay. Jabbour abstained. Callahan said that this Is the current standard of the rulings of the Council in connection with marina licenses. Butler felt that It was unfair that all m^.rir,a3 'lid not get the reduced fee for 1990. It was moved by Qoetten, seconded by Ma/or Peterson, to direct staff to waive the $50.00 late fee for the 1992 marina license for Windward Marine. Ayes 4, nays 0. Jabbour abstained. (•13) LEAF STREET RECONSTRUCTION UPDATE Moorse explained this is an update after the meeting on site with staff and the residents of the area after the sewer area had been Staked. Osrhardson reported th'jt after the meeting ail had the understanding that the sewer would have the greatest impact to the property as it relates to reoiovai of existing improvements. Ms said the residents were not convinced that a 28* paved roadway would be appropriate. He said the residents are under the impression that there will be a separata meeting to inform the residents of the Council's decision on this street. Butler asked if Cygnet and Loaf Street are not sewered, there will not be a need for the meeting. 8 n-' , O’Fi----------’■^Sfv^. P^:-; ■p- ^VP-' ,;i^: ,tV;''’<: ' ^16# L^i W*'m»!<?;>' r •.-,- •> ■ ¥V ' ■ i#"" SI." Sli-tSt i#- ■'if. n-i:.-^^" ■ ■ ■W( !%''' ‘ **' *'''' iB. m’ -J:' • mm I: I'Wr y - /-r-iAVif.|:S tpf V : -, .f A- ...*. -2.> -i. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 22» 1992 LEAF STREET RECONSTRUCTION UPDATE - CONT. Jabbour undarstood that they would still need to dig up thi street to install the trunk line. Qerhardson noted It would be Jabbour asked how many other the use of H8A funds. just to the Luce Line Trail, streets within the City are allowed Qerhardson read off the list MSA funds for one of these otherJabbour suggested they use the streets. Frank St. Lawrence, 253 Cygnet Place, said there was some confusion about the cost of the sewer project and the amount it would be reduced if MSA funds were used. Mary Lou Lutz, 258 Cygnet Place, said her main concern is safety, and felt that If the road were wider It would be more unsafe. Sullivan noted that the road is fairly narrow and a wider road may be safer. He added that citizens typically see cars traveling faster than the actual speed. He said that if the road were widened, it may become a preferred shortcut. Qerhardson noted he suggested to the residents that a sidewalk could be installed along Leaf Street, but they were not receptive to that idea. (•14) ESTABLISH A ITORK SESSION TO DISCUSS MNDOT'S HIQHVAY 12 HEARING Moorse asked if the Council wishes the residents to be notified of the public hearing. Qoetten felt that a postcard would be appropriate. Jabbour suggested that their expert testify at the public hearing. Mayor Peterson agreed with Jabbour. Butler suggested they continue the Council meeting to Wednesday, June 24, 1992, at 3:00 p.m. to continue discussion on the public hearing held by MnOot. 4 % A - ■ •r.s’.'i.-*7 -».7-N ife-' VI ’ .••}•• •VV' t^. iti'-'r. V/nm :'Wm L MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 22. 1992 (•15) ESTABLISH A WORK SESSION TO REVIEW THE PRELIMINARY 1993 ANNUAL BUDGET Mayor Peterson announced that a work session will be held on August 3. 1992 at 3:00 p.m. In the Council Chambers to review the pre'lfflinary 1993 annual budget. ATTORNEY’S REPORT - EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Petarton adjourned the regular Council meeting at 9:15 p.m. to Executiva Sasslon. (a#i6) LICENSES Thara ware no license. (••17) BILLS It was moved by Jabbour. seconded by Goat ten, to approve payment of the All Funds Account, as revised. Ayes 5, nays 0. AOJOURNNENT It wai ilOvad by Jabbour, seconded by Butier, to continue the Orono City Council meeting to Wednesday. Junt 24, 1992 at 3:00 p.m. in tha Orono Counci I Chambers. Ayes 5. nays 0. Barbara A. Paterson. Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hal I in. City Clerk ■ -'h ^ . ■ '■ ... ■- - - - -_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -V.- - - - - .4 i t ■ iis^: •! ■ISte. KWiiv- iK'» 5"»ot Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator % Oa m m pS|K Ki2'- Troas Dates Subjects Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building fc Zoning Administrator July 2, 1992 % #1739 Albin J. Nelson, 500 Oxford Road - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution Additional Szhlbits - F - Notice of Council Action 6/26/92 Flannlag CoeBiasion Coeaenta Notice was sent to applicant advising of Council's concern involving the removal of trees as a result of the filling activities. Nr. Nelson advised staff that he will attend the July 13th meeting in order to address this issue and any other concerns Council members may have. The enclosed approval resolution can be amended to include any mm- additional conditions concerning a replanting schedule. ml:K §!iW:"'Bt., - K ' W- ^ . ‘X- mM S ; " n f !*• J Kf- i. Likt r -'iin'APPLICATIOH MO. 1739 cm OF ORCMK) F«0. Box 66 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION ^ Crystal Bay* MN 55323 # 673-7357 Date of Notice* 6/26/92 __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ; fOt Nr. 6 Mrs. Albin J. Nelson COPIES* # ■ 500 Oxford Road OroBO# MN 55356 If Vm OP AFFLICATIOMt Conditional Use Permit if OBm OP NBTINGt June 22, 1992 VOTE: 5 For 0 Against __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _— • — — < :v-‘ e> t I MCXL ACTION - NOTION* "Ifp (Wft-Notion to table as applicant was not in at 'ndance at the meeting and unable to respond to questions pertaining to trees that would be destroyed m.witb the proposed filling. Council questioned whether applicant's -C.' . Y.landscape contractor had a replanting schedule for trees to be removedape during the construction. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed at the Council meeting of July 13, 1992. Applicant is asked to submit information as to a raplanting program or other methods to save trees in area where fill was to be placed. Please contact Jeanne Mabusth (473-7357) if you have any questions peJTtaining to the directives noted above. fe-' a , fllH. iii^ mm. ' ■ •J: ‘im laviVV'•s' %J ■i"; » #llPS^•,vV ‘ -te H-v...»: - M y pi-w ffv f^--' ■t ' mm dr SK ■"'i r' r^-'. mk,: ^/V Wr' ^iJ’- lAS5S CITY «rf ORONO :5^C8H0 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _______________ A RBSOLOTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 FILE #1739 WHEREAS, Albin J. Nelson, (hereinafter "the applicant ) is the owner of the property located at 500 Oxford Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as Lot 7, Block 1, Stielows Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit to permit the filling of over 100 cubic yards at 2.5 to 1 slopes to the west side of an existing pool that involves the removal of tiered retaining walls and the installation of 50 lineal feet of a 4’ high retaining wall along HOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning Pile #1739 The property is located in the LR~1A Lakeshore Single Family Residential Zoning District requiring 2 acres in area. The property consists of 2+ acres. 3.On June 15, 1992, the Orono Plannina Commission reviewed the application as proposed an recommended approval based on the following findings. a.The existing tiered retention wall is in a serious state of disrepair and endangers existing improvements located in the adjacent higher elevations. b.The proposed land alterations - - central portion of the property and will have no impact on adjacent residences. are located in the Page 1 of 4 - W h- i I.r' /' ^^v.- 1^' w fo/\v O Aw ^/l CITY of ORONO ,cY RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO C.Proposed improvements will have no negative impact on the historic drainage patterns of the neighborhood . 4.The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the proposed land alteration and installation of a 4' high retaining wall will not be be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the affect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the community. CONCI,D*iTnNS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 to permit land alteration improvements as shown on topographic detail by Nark S. Gronberg of Coffin and Gronberg, Inc. dated May 19, 1992, subject to the following conditions: 1.The timbers from the retaining walls to be removed shall be disposed at an approved disposal site. 2.Final elevations at 2.5 to 1 slopes must be restored with groundcover of a type of vegetation that will not require regular maintenance. 3,Granular material and drain tile to be installed be! ’’•d 3-4* retention wall at base of fill site to minimi, j hydrostatic pressure at the base of the wall. 4.Slopes she'1 be graded to allow a small drainage swale running a 1 ong the top of the wall. Such swale wouId divert surface runoff to the sides and minimize amounts of runoff flowing over wall. Page 2 cf 4 1 ■ (, I'~rr;.*' IS:, Vf-. ' fyr ... ■^V V W'".A>^y ■■ <‘cy} 'r- -h ':;?!»'?■ m'-. 4.:. CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________ 5.Type of material to be used in the construction of retention wall must be approved by the City Engineer. 6.Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a land alteration permit within one year of the date of Council approval or the authority granted in this resolution will expire on that date (July 13, 1993). 7.Vi'jlation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 8.The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 13th day of July, 1992. ATTEST* Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Albin J. Kelson Property Owner(s) STATE OP MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13th day of July, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson fc Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor * City Clerk of the city of Orono, a ..innesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 4 1 F-*I-::''-"'Tj=!§.;■•r',- V-’- r' i'- R /'■m- % -•V' Iv - > b- Kr.- m.- I »•(-:s^t?. ;E-:- ii-LS-- ►1:i:-sm ^v^y. ■'•• ' - ? ■:-. -I- Toi Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse* City Administrator ^ 05e4. «s Proa: Datet Subject s Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building fi. Zoning Administrator 0/>& <VN''.S June 9, 1992 V #1741 Rodney J. and Shannon K. Batzlaff - 1115 Brown Road South - Variance - Public Hearing Soaiag Districts RP-IB, Rural residential, 2 acre minimum Pertinent Ordinances 1, Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) - Variance required for placement of accessory structure i’^ front of front line of principal structure. Accessory ^structure to be located 22' in front of principal structure. 2.Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (F) - Side yard setback for accessory structure. Required Proposed Variance » 10' - 8* » 2* or 20% 3. 10' setback is allowed for structures less than 750 s.f. in area. Total area of accessory structure is 440 s. f. h Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 - Front street tetback. Required ■ 50 Proposed “ 20 43 Variance - 30 (edge of 33' of right-of-way) (from traveled road) or 60% 4.Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Review of lot coverage. Note hardcover standards are not pertinent to this review as property is not located within 1,000* of the s oreline of Lake Minnetonka or French Lake. Total lot area • 14,824.25 s.f. (approximately) Allowed ■ 2,223.6 s.f. oz 15% Proposed " 1,802.4 s.f. or 12.15% No lot coverage variance is required. List of Bxbibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Hap D - Adjacent Property Owners Acknowledgement Form E - l^rk Sketch/Site Plan P - S|M4C Sheet G - Section H • Proposed Site Plan 1 - Existing Survey n V''-' p c;:?- - 'If.t"1, !&:If'-V tm.. 'i ■ %K p-, . ■ V*r,; ' k; . 'W *■ ■ ^. /. ;K‘ n iV:. m ‘.:i- / •; ^ Li Zoning Pile #1741 June 9> 1992 Page 2 of 2 Description of Request Applicant proposes th< :t£ garage within the stree yax requiring setback variancj:; a would require placement of a de^ at or behind front line of pri 1 ! ;ior of a 20' x 22' detached L tl• residential property . V r ^^rce to the section that j ^ ai .ge to be placed either ic . residence. The garage is placed 20' frcm the actual County oad right-of-way and 44' from the traveled road. Doors far away from the street with turnaround provided on site. The proposed structure is to be located i’’ between the two mature trees. Lot coverage is ■aintainea 12%. The City has received no negat ive comments fron the two adjacent neighbors who have signed off on the Neighbors Acknowledgement B'orm. ■srdsbip Stateaent Please review Exhibit A, Applicant's Addendum. The shape of the lot prevents structure from being placed adjacent to principal structure nor is there sufficient area to allow an access drive to rear of property without the removal of mature tree. The garage shall be placed on site so that trees will not be threatened by construction. Garage is consistnet with variances approved for adjacint neighbor for detached garage in street yard at property located at 1135 South Brown Read. OptioBS of Action Approval as proposed. OR Approval as amended. Denial. If this application is approved, the City must ask that the proposed 20* x 22* detached gar. ige be designated on a legal survey of the property prior to scheduling the application before the Council. lev 'I * ; m t*^,vtrmm- 1'" M'V--fciV'i m:- :i \ fp' f i^'' Sif ’ X'’ Ifr: ■IV'l. Its' i't. i?i'Ifw r •fe*' mi It; :''ss i'^-V : ;t# sfttfs. --■i, E%^s>s, V-' i n p- ■f: '> - ; ftt#' Zoning File 11741 July I, 1992 Peg* 3 MditiOBal CcMMnta and i>lannlng CoHalssion RecoMendation Additional Bzhibit J - Amended Survey The applicants have provided proposed structure on the property, but stre an amended survey placing the Note side setback remains at 8* street setback is improved from 20* to 23.1*. Revised setback facts are as follows: Required - 50* Proposed “ 23.1* Variance ■ 27*9"55.0% The Planning Commission advised the applicant that in recosusending approval of e variance as proposed, approval is conditioned on the existing torage shed Ic/cated in rear yard being relocated to conform to IQ' side setback. Applicants agreed with the reco—sndation of the Planning Commission. I 1 Planning Commission members accepted the hardship statement of applicants and unanimously approve the proposed variances as requested by the applicants. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission's recommendation. : I aili ........ 'i--' ‘A fV.‘.CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50*00 par each additional variance) Ranawal Variance Fee $100.oc (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 j^£ter-the-Pact Fees (Double application fee) #17 / 5 L. i I # t. * ^ i ' f ■* m’C ' 'C rTr. • . > I h U » A . V' V V W' W' V' . • •’ L’/«j I * S’J vA i 9xftr\fnr. “*—----- i , . . A » o,y V PIOPBRTY INFORMATION «Ni ^ K r ^ y f ^ J « 4 » ' , » , » . ^ . W V-^- . » V w' Site Address l!i^ ^AC7 ScuT>^ • ' •- . / D«t« °"rr“^*Y (mont.Vyear) I Mnxfiti BO^ also own the adjacent parcels of land Present Ae of prop^ty: X residential other(specify) FZoning District: APPIiXCANT Phone (home) H (g 33 ( Name fcr>NfeV vSMA/^^N K SAT^LAfj^cne (work) ^2.^X3 ■'f. b AAArmmm: "RP Cirv ; VJ ----- Zip; (1-. (if different than applicant)Phone (home) bi‘/' S 'p’- K I# i'^ame Phone (work) ouatzmom of IIBQOBST Estiir.ated Construction Cost S (pOOO . OO------ gNMXANCBS NNQUIIUBEI Lot Area Address:City;Zip: Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage >Csetback; Front Other (specify)____ X Side Pear Average La)ceshore «XF/DB8C*irriON OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and CUY> conditionsip iOUe narasnip ----------------------- preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirement 1 nnone herlrcom ^ omA Ayl ucJDOmt Ym (attach additional sheets if necessarv) KBQOIlUn) SUBMITTALS All of the folloirlpcT information must be submitted by the application data in order for yoor applicatloa to be considered cntpietes Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150» (you must obtain thie list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). iO-'in ^3 000^ . —__^Plmt Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyji) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%"xll" for I reproduction). S.N^Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes V in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8*i"xll"), €• V Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8*j"xll").7.AS an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. ••_ _^Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. rem«aber that yoor Tariancm application is not complete if th tlon hee not been included^ Please AVnJCAMT*8 SZGHATOIIS The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her )cnowledge. Applicant * 8 Date SZSMAIVIUI The ovner hereby acJcowledges and ^r^SA to this application and further authorises reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agentSr Consnission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request ^ •Ignatur. Shimt'lt < I—.V—a A^lioaat must have all submitta?ir"into the City offices 25 days before the flanninq Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled smeimm meetings of tho Planning rrssilaaion and Council, if an applicant is M®BAle to attend a scheduled meeting, please siake arrangements to have an authorised agent attend in your place and to advise the Building a Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. m'' n *• •Ad jacent’property Owners' Acknowledgement Pom. I (we)y // ^ i [print name(s)][print aiddress] have reviewed the plans referred to as located at / --^ - --- - - use of the £ Land Use property Application No-- - - - - . ■” j *.K.4- -in execuf'ng this acknowledgement, I (we) am _ 1 (we) approval or disaoproval of the property or use (are) not asked cip., council that I (we) am (are) aware of but merely to confirm for proposed neighbor's project or the improvement plans and that the p requires Council approval. ^2 ':^Jl A ^ Property owner Date property of 110^ S. Jlr^(x'A ^ S. (print address IS'I (we) { I l-,! (print name(s)] F;i . ".‘.“uiSiaSE Application No. I (we) understand that in (are) not asked to declare-approv^ ^ „re) aware of but merely to confirm the C ppppsed neighbor's projec- or the improvement plans and that t..e pr p requires Council approval. property Owner S'- zz-Sf. Date -'1 .. property Owner Date a■fi •-«. c*^v in the review of If you have any y:«r cclt.ntV" o the Building . :riVasVird.^yi-p‘” rto-\h/ .ch.dul.d m..tr.ng date. 1 4^ . J T ' r Ik . 1 4JJl r 1.4:Tj ♦ f WORK ORDER rfifi ,jj 1IS2 COMO AVENUE ST PAUL. MN 85108 NAME J HOME PHONE: ^ -( __BUS. PHONE;_______________ /Iftl OMtHptioi •l__ in----------- mn. ‘yitCo JOB ADDRESS ///r J»■T~Ty At.I BLOG CODE AREA_J^ SALESM CONTRACT DATE o««t. ItviuSSSL 3 §V Ow<^tr Aoprox 3(« .starting points only .rl . 'imfm Sod Ptmovti S«nd Pill__ 3SBUAr iAmS ■ • WitN tad R«f*i. • Bv lABU. • Grad* Point ____tt: C%v OaJoVf C bv Suiwi Wir«roof Qlv Ow^ CBv Sot. ifiii GSv 0««^ GB v SutMi 2M«»ntain 8’ Total Wait H#i^t iMOudtnp Slocks 0^ IIBiinfain 8' Wall He>gnt on Top of Slocks •«k S*W fTop coufsai 4^ '■.* Sutttittf oarM* No □ * “------ - j Attacfsad oMI ba: V^Oddadftad to L.S. Bv ownar *Ra«owad Sv ; Ov¥»^#f G C i:P, li' ■ PON OPPIC8 USE ONLY Block! exor/A^6- T»p -------0Ai-i4f- m illiiii I No i|,ffvtY •** <*<»»• Z '"at - N.^ GSOtOd l'<5n» ^ 1 ' ^V-CWkW PX(»^ i----- OiAftTiON »• ttruACiCSi*^ imitialS r- -I 1 ■K.-'J IIS r\ 1 T GAhACE ES'^IMATE FORM • i j * f ^ t *• m • ' I • 1 ■ » • . P’' « • ) • QSfCf > /■ r r. « •a « f ti' Ji 'A . •iil •‘il‘ ■ -1 DATE;2h^ ■ .••} : 1*1 I it *» »• |j^ Si'' c'® P • jf c u 'I :.• • ( IS □ i6x2r ’ ' :o ' ( :2 Otner 22 22 22 I» « ♦ 1 . ■ I JImmntton 1$ width 1 •.A. 1 y *T»* □ “N«ar BiH* Framed by SUSSEL "AN Binr Pull! by SUSSEL Oatachad » □ Attached Li I i I;.1 ^ QABLE Overhang (Ctfci«? 0 «» 18* L’f a Overhang 12* 18' REVERSE gable Eavo Ov»»fHarg (Circi* On«| 12* 10* 24' Rake Overhang Riush 12* 18’ i> C HIP : jr Eave Overhang {Circle One) "* *9* lO • • jingles v» *h < (ter'' ' ;r.i '•» rnoi sheathing ir <•r' 2 / •S’*'; ^,ent»tf'^ nij M.inufactured Trusses 2 X 4's ’f’ *)!(/•all H“'ghl S ATNINQ y V2"iaa/‘ti 5. -’2' Bi'fJiito f ’i/2'Pty\eood □ 1 <2'Wafer Board □ None BOOOA;m ^ =r t; *•. 1 4 --4 t □ Wood Pan ji iL‘ ”‘.P O QIaas No Qiass O Raised P incl , □ Flush ^ > a Textured i|| •i'i I- □ Raised ReiMood 1 I Steel Ribbed Raiaed Panel »i =t 5f •'«» L No O 2'8" X 8*8' C 3 0' X 8'0' : iUpMll window 1 ¥'Oiaee' | " g Wdod No. Qleee Steel a in • . »• r H.' ■> B Included □ By Purchoeer 12.M.OCKS: OReduM [SAeNoiR.^iB is: r ::r N '• • • K: ■■I trfC IC I -, 1 j *! ■* 'i * ' " 'J/i! ^ ’I **r.■iai Hamiihripf «: “IjV. ■i » 1 ^ « - ^,yj70 . e* A m • -1 ^ , •Per Month ^ liSsSBi J f }It y 'i f "{; . { ' IF' -4^•aw ♦' t I?.*' ■ k-f- ROOF REVERSE GABLE HIP SILGARA^EAVE OVERHANG /P — rake overhang SEAL DOWN SHINGLES WITH PLYWOOD OR WAFER0OARO ROOF SHEATHING AND 15 LB. FELT Seal Down Shingles Trim NOTE II Bool ipprovod By Minn SU1« Building Deoi n meeting Mmn S-at* Cod* of 30# snow load 2) Hip rooN coniijl ol 2' « » 'att..5.2 x 8 croii lies 48' O C 2 . 8 ' hip rinofs and no plywood Qussats ar« used TrusaasAAFTEnS STUDS 2 WALL SHCATHINQ INQ: /2A O c OVERHEAD DOOR HEADER: Doubla2*'*’2 or 2 • Micro Lams---- ■V.-S 8l4» on gran* atfwctioo acoroveo ?•< Minn**.^ .a State Cooe o State Buiicmg Ci.j‘ - !**umoet ” Sl^B ^ MESH 6 » 1 I 4 SuD fascia Fascia — 3 4 Cove 2*4* Studs Siding f / 1 2 ■ Anchor Bort / 2 Tf*aiea 8onomP ’«i' 4ll ^£-\ T ■ST»3e T i t m//,- • 'i'l it,; A RBSOLDTIOH GRAHTIHG VARIANCBS TO MUHICIPAL SOHIHG CODB SBCTIOH 10.03, SUBDIVISION 9 (D), SBCTIOH 10.03, SUBDIVISION 15 (P) AND SBCTIOH 10.28, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) PILE #1741 WHBRBAS, Roc ney J. Batzlaff anc] Shannon K. Batzlaff (h«reinaft«r "the applicants") are owners of the property locafid at 1115 Brown Road South within the City of Oronc (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Refer to Exhibit A attached (hereinafter "the property")? and WHBRBAS, the applicants ha^•e applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 1(3.03^ Subdivision 9 \D) to allow a detached garage to be constructed 42' in front of the front line of the principal structure, a variance to Section 10.03, Sul Jivision 15 (P) that wourld allow the detached structure to be placed 8' from the side lot line instead of the required 10' and a variance to Section 10.38, Subdivision 5 (B) to allow the structure to be placed 23.1’ from front/street lot line instead of the required 50' . Minnesota: WOW, TBBRBPORB, BB IT RBSOLVPD by the City Council of Orono, PIHDIHGS 1. 2. This application was reviewec3 as Zoning Pile #1741. The property is located in the RB-IB Rural Residential Single Pamily Zoning District requiring 2 acres in area. The property consists of approximately 14,824.25 s.f. or .34 acres. Page 1 of 5 U4^ ■r r< "■ (:■ m 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on June 15, 1992 and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upc*i the following hardships and findings: a.The shape of the 1 prevents structure from being placed adjacent to principal structure. b.Insufficient barrier to allow an access drive ro rear of property without requiring the removal of the only mature trees on property. c.The proposed location of the garage in the street yard is consistent with the pattern of development for accessory structures within this neighborhood. d.The .34 acre parcel is required to be developed under 2 acre soning standards. e.The proposed improvement does net exceed the lot coverage allowance for structural improvements proposed at 1,802.4 s.f. or 12.15%. 4.The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose ji fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not mez?ly serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a deeonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 5 'kS?'.?' :rpe. .pf ^ ^-IL , ■ ’- :vP . r^pvS> • P ;;■;•■ :.f -•■> :|P. ,;p-' pp..; ^ -/■ . ' iP'-'.' 1?- %■ r„::, &:■ ,..'V- •...:■■■ isr ' ■'-■■■ , 5.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. COHCLOSIOHS, ORDER AMD CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D), Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (F) and Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) subject to the following conditions: 1.Prior to the footing inspection for the proposed detached garage in street yard, applicants shall relocate accessory shed in rear yard to required 10* side setback. 2.Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (July 13, 1993). 3.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a vi lation of the soning code, shall autosuitically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdesMianor. 4.The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terns of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. m- My- 3 of 5 .vv;: t. ■ - ' /jtV.''.'k: - 'ViV-'- ma. ■. Adopt«o by th« Orono City Council on this 13th day of July, HTTI8T1 fiorotby M. Haltin, City clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor )f J. Batslaff if^trty 0i#iMr(8) Shannon K, Batzlaff mWiMM or HumisoTA ) )mm.mmm or amiBPXM ) The foregoing inatrueent was acknowledged before me on this aith day of July, 1992, by Berbers A. Peterson a Dorothy N. Beilin, Mayor § city clerk of the City of ^rono, a Minnesota municipel filpo ratioft end said t i'‘*^.rument was executed on behalf of the City. Bift ■'m Notary Public I'.i. .W ^ *■ Page 4 of 5 mB '%Mk 14-'■A i 1 1 1 ■n u i m ■f. .m&-m -,, . ■.. W'.,fegpg- ■ -fey*. .«■ c. ' StATi or NimiBSOTA COWTY or HSmiBPIM ) as. i,^’: Oa this day of 199 BS s Notary Public witnin and for said county» personally tPPNT**^ tno«m to me to be ^as Ipsrsoa(s) described in and who executed the foregoing iastniMnt, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC iTATI OP NXNIIESOTA ) )SB COUNTY OP BINNSPXM ) Ob this day of 199 # before meVW VSB<* V _______ «■/ I — ' - ^ Votary Public within and for said County,i^rsonally appeared _known to me to be the Mrsoa(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument» sad sekaowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. kofXfrMJin? Page s of 3 ., -Jr (ii#- _hekiM iek.iaiOBifii 4 th-i.>fe*iii-._feK.-::••EXHIBIT A k' All thit pirt of Government Lot 6, Section 10, Township 117, Range 23, de- Sertbtd as follows: 'Beginning at a point on the East line of said Lot 6 distent 725.02 feet South of the Northeast corner thereof; thence West at right angles to said East line, a distance of 258.72 feet, more or less, to an intersection with a line d awn parallel with and distant 216.69 feet MOftheasterly from the center line of County Road No. 87; thence Southeast erly along said parallel line a distance of 47.95 feet; thence deflecting loft an angle of 39 degrees and 45 minutes a distance of 234.2 feet, more Of less, to the center line of County Road No. 146; thence Northerly along lest said center line to the point of beginning, Hennepin County, Minnesota ■ W3 . ■ m 8« j’. f rk'?*^.v*■'''•• r/vvF'.v'-k, y'ir,-. . . • • ^ ■ I'ji .^W I: -I ■. 3 '^3 '■■k j K*’ A:%Chairnuin Kelley and Planning Conunisslon Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse# City Administrator %% Jeanne A. Mabusth* Building fi> Zoning Administrator June 10» 1992 #1742 Jasws and Amy Laing, Variance - Public Bearing 500 Orono Orchard Road - \ ir ■ 1.Section 10.28, Subd. 5. A. V .•• ' m- Front/street setback (Orono Orchard Road) Required - 50*. Existing * 36'8*. Proposed - 43*7*. Variance - 6'3■ B. !F:/.>; »*ipP> Side/street setback (Dickinson Street) Required - 50*. Existing ■ minus 2.1”. Proposed • 19*1”. Variance ■ 30'9” or 62%. C.Rear setback (12* alley not considered street) Required * 50*• Existing ■ 43*6". Proposed ** 10'6* (18'6* to traveled portion of alley). Variance ■ 39*6* or 79.2%. 'M-»V % - 2.Review of lot coverage. A. wr’iSflt:-' Section 10.03, S«ibd. 14 (C). Total area ■ 19,185 s.f. Allowed - 2,877.75 s.f. or 15%. Proposed - 2,722.07 s.f. or 14.1%. IP 'mm' B. •'I'' Total lot area - 38,377 s.f. if 6 lots are legally Alloeed^i^i755.5 s.f. or 151 Proposed • 2,722.07 s.f. or 7.09%. mMm Property is not located within 1,000* of Lake Minnetonka and not Btthjoot to t^ Sliereland Regulations of the City. . : ‘ f W' I, ' ■ -.fc. liiai • s!5 Pmm ..Inlifrni' % ■> i t P*.:' W. ¥■ i'w- ^•i it f't^ Soiling Pile #1742 June lOf 1992 Page 2 List of Inhibits A - Application B1*2 “ Applicant's Addendum C - Property Owner’s List D - Plat Map Bl-2 - Survey p - Ploor Plan Cl-2 - Building Elevation Deseriptioa of Bequest Applicants propose a family/room garage addition to the east side of the existing residence and a 16'x28' bedroom addition to the south side requiring the approval of multiple setback variances. Applicants own '' lots. Lots 22 through 24 and 1 through 3 have been legally combined under two separate PID's but because of the 12' alley ••parationf applicants have been unable to legally combine all parcels. The City will attempt to file the legal combination at the City offices. If Coun*:y refuses the legal combination, the City will ask applicants to execute a special lot combination as a condition of the Multiple variance approval. Though applicants' addendum Exhibit B# suggests that a rear setback variance would not be required upon the legal combination, staff would hold that the rear setback for a principal structure would still be required because of the 12* alley. Zn previous applications dealing with setback from unpaved alleys irtiere properties are legally combined on both sides of alley, the 10' fi^tback wa. still required. T’ j legal combination will have an impact OB lot coverage. Zn reviewing Exhibit D, it should be noted that the Coonty has approved previous legal combinations of properties divided by the 12* alley so it appears that the County has already approved eimilar legal combinations. The applicants also propose the removal of the existing detached garage that encroaches 2' within the Dickinson Street right-of-way and the temporary garden shed. The City cannot consider the vacation of the 12* alley as it is currently used by property owners to the south for access. Cuirent proposal shows the detached garage with doors facing towards alley. Applicants will also achieve access from 12* alley. Although actual OOtback to alley is shown at lO'#", the garage will be li'8* from the portion of the traveled or developed alley right-of-way. A new curb out onto public right-of-way must be approved by the Public Works PopartSMnt. It appears that the limited setback distance will Booeasitate portions of the turn around to be located on the public right-of-way and should also be approved by the Public Works Pof^tment. i ■? 1 r.m J^l'- .' ,Ht '•■ '^■‘U:*V' •> 'lAw#.»lf^-ami'zoninf Pile #1742 June 10, 1992 Page 3.ig*- - BrJgfcip 8tat !:-J- life vil.'- Pleaie raviaw Exhibit B, applicants have provided a detailed hardship statanant for the City's consideration. Hardships are raviaifad as follows: 1.2 acres standards are to be applied to the building site that is less than a 1/2 acre in area. 2. 3. Location of housa on property “ r*5*’. mm Currant datachad garage encroaches Dickinson Street right-* of'way and creates hazards for users of Dickinson Street and adjacent alley because structure impacts siting distance and is a potential hazard for users of public road. .'''' ''4.Location of garage in relation to crest of the hill and adjacent accesses. s. 6. Location of mature trees to the south. Persistant surface runnoff/drainage problems necessitate the retention of a low depression or retention area within the south yard of the property. Oll^osui of Actloe imp iXm 't': mm I##?'?:- Approval as proposed or as amended or Denial. Any approval of this application must include the following conditionst ■1. 6- - W Applicants to either legally combine all 6 parcels or execute a special lot combination recognising the property as one unit. 2, iife ■' _• ; ''k V .m. Kemoval of existing detached garage and garden shed located adjacent to Dickinson Street. 3. y-. Applicant to obtain driveway permit for new curb cut onto alley off Dickinson Street and to provide a detailed plan of drivemay to be installed as portions of backout apron will be located in 12* alley. mmrnk' w m '3K I, 'W®ssi« ■T-” i-: i?-m %V I I ! I ii'l n^:mmm-y toning File 11742 Jane 10, 1992 Wmfm 45is4. ^m%: ifilfc ■■■. m-i V • m i§0yyi>^ V. ktv;6vSi- _ J ,0- J ■"a» ■,h: Jl “■' C0 Based on historic drainage problems on the property^ applicants shall provide a grading and drainage plan with building permit application which would address new drainage needs as a result of these improvements.■IKf s 4 I •' V-• ■ ■ r^rr'T-^ ,t •« ■r- .-T-rr -tn-^.*'''^ ‘■'■A- w;i# ' VV =S .SOiliM FlU II742 Jmtc 30, 1992 Fag« S AAiitioMl OoMSBts and Flaaniiiq Cnaal salon R ndatioB flannlng Comnlsslon nenbers concurred that the propoaed inprovanants to this property will greatly ir crease the safety for thoaa parsons who walk or drive the adjacent public roads. The axistlng garage encroaches 2+* into the right-of-way of Dickenson gtreet and creates siting hazards for the users of the adjacent alley. m 'W-\ ■ The Planning Cosuslssion granted unanimous approval of the eerienees as requested and accepted the hardship i^t^tement as set forth in applicants* addendum. Exhibit B. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission's reoonsisndation. r ■ ■eh -Sr. ■M- ■ # : 'V*'' ;• A'^ilr ’I A P'- ‘M- ■llpn Sii ? ' i»r -S.li. "r I ^ \-‘r r.Vm Kc. 1i 4. yH :v ■'v 3 4 'i 9^ 1: ''‘I- If .... ..:^.i. :-li . ■% r....:„. •j'J’iIi^'i' ii-VLiSku K/*' ■*! ■ ■■j. W2#^>';.h::v;i- h RBSOLOTIOH GBAMTIHG VMUAIKXS TO NOaiCirAL lOHIMS OOOB SBCTIOM 10.2t, SUBDIVISION 5 PILB #1742 HnxiAS# Jams H. Laing and Any J. Laing (hereinafter *tha ApplieAlltA*) era owaara of the property located at 500 Orono Orcharl load within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally doacribed as followst i|..liOts 1$ 2, 3, 22# 23 and 24# Block 13# Minnetonka Bluffa# lOAMpin County# Minnesota (hereinafter "the property*); and mim# the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28# Subdivision 5 to jporait the construction of an addition to the east and south side of I-..-. ^ ^ A A ^ it. tho existing residence requiring approval of the following street setback variancesi A.Pront/street setback (Orono Orchard Road) Required « 50* Proposed « 43*7* Variance - 6*3* or 12.6% ■ ■ B.Side/street setback (Dickenson Street) Required * 50* Proposed - 19*1* Variance - 30*9* or 62% ■ ■ ii'"- 't' '?»■ Rear setback (12* alley) Required ■ 50* Proposed - 10*6* Variance - 39*4* or 79.2% iiinesotai #&■ i. low# VnUPOlB# BB IT aBBObVRD by the City Council of Or^no# PHD1BQS This application was reviewed as Zoning Pile #1742. til" is -:': ••Page 1 of 5 fPS-mP &■ 'iililifl ....................... i'.y- a i J W"te.WAV'i.-#■■” ■' 'F% I- k-r ‘K: ik: H I. . |V ;-i r-'- ''■ P ► ‘ r v'- !>■ % I y0i '-M-- I'' H- '•Bfe' I Jf‘‘7' r.v-:B a I V ^.■• !..4:b- m,. ■ mm. ii:; W- '#1 2. 3. 5. •*? Th« property is located in t^e RR-lB Rural Residential Zoning District r-squiring 2 acres of dry buildable area. The total property consists of 3t', 377 s.f. or .88 icres. The Orono Planning Conurlssion reviewed this application on June I5« 1992 and recon.Tiended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following hardships and findings: a) The building envelope defined by public rights-of-wa^ is less than 1/2 acre in area and subject to RR-IB, acre rural standards. b) The existing house is located within substandard setbacks from the adjacent right-of-ways. Current detached garage encroaches Dickenson Street right-of-way and creates hasards for users of Dickenson Street and adjacent alley. The structure limits sighting distance and is a potential hasard for users of public road. The location of the existing g& *age in crest of the hill and adjacent accesses. relat:on tt e)The location of mature trees to the south of the existing residence. Persistent surface runof f/drai nage problems that necessitate the retention of a low depressiott or retention area within the south yard of the property. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this toning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions* light* air nor pose a fire haxard or other danger to neighboring property; would not sierely serve as a convenience to the applicant* but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the appllcantf>i and would be in keeping with the spirit and Intent of the loning Cede and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 5 i iiw- 6. 'y- »r ♦ Th* City Council has considered this application including the findings and recomnendations of the Planning Coiranission* reports by City staff, conments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the conniiunity. OOHCLOtlOMS, ORDBR AMD COVDITIONS Fesed upon one or eore of the above findings, the Orono City Council h«treby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.2I, Sub<livision Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the construction of a fesiily roosi/garage addition to the east side of the residence and a bedroom addition to the south side requiring approval of setback variances as already noted above, subject to the following conditions: 1.Applicants shall immediately apply for the legal combination of all six parcels at the City offices. 2. % henoTal of existing detached garage and garden shed located adjacent to Dickenson Street to be completed at the tio» of the footino inspection for the proposed additions. 3. m , Applicants to obtain driveway permit from Public Works irector ftDirector for new curb cut onto alley off Dickenson Street and to provide a detailed plan of driveway to be installed as portions of backout apron will be located in 12* alley right-of-way. 4.Applicants shall provide grading and drainage plans with building f^armit application to address new drainage needs as a result of these istprovements. 5. * : ; fr , Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and mat be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council ai^roval, or this variance will expire on that date (July 13, 1993). S.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violatitwi of the soning code, shall autoamtica1 ly terminace any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 3 of 9 K: - y »r-* . ~ 7^T_v . : :.v--A :®> » ®i:;: - ri -•'■ ■■ . i-': ■;■^V-' I- I <■, ' '• ;fe - .* - F - : -'■ 1%- ■:5PS/' pi"RvN-'h".' !.-■&; 1.'. • IE- ■m ife'Sv-Pi.vi'' 7.Th« undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. 1992. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 13th day of July, ATTEST* Dorothy K. Hallin, City Clerk Barba’'a A. Peterson, Mayor James H. Laing Property Owner(s) Amy J. Laing STATE OP NZMMESOTA ) ) ss. COUWTY OP BBlfMEPlM ) The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13th day of July, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson « Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor k city Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instruswnt was executed on behalf of the City. notary Public Page 4 of 5 -yf. to "T-r- 6¥AtE OF MINNESOTA ) ) 8S. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) On this bnfors sppnnrnd day of 199 a Notary Public within and for said countyr personally MPpMMrad known to me to be thn person(s) <iescrTEed in and who executed the foregoing instraent* and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )S8. OOOHTY OF HENNEPIN ) On ^ia day of_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.» before me a Rotary Public witliTn and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the naraon(a) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, _ * ^ ^ ^ ^ sene ea hisparson(si descrineo xn ano wno - - - - -- and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLid rfcr^Page 5 of S .... ■ K- -1. /'7‘Z CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Ranawal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application Variance for non conforming uae $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) #17 “^ ntOFSRn IVPOMIATION Site AddreaaSbg C4tMO cyg.cH»e^^r f r v r*r »>r:nw/7 froperty Identif. Number (P.I .D.) 3^ OZ.—m •" *2.3 Oo \ Z. Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. OatJ|«^roperty Acquired I’t. - Zt.-(month/year) lUooVdo not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. A w'^Vi Prallpt use of propert Sonin'j District:Itik y residential other(specify) Fir^AHCt OFFICE tVJOOOOO 01 QEfi 250.00 CHECK li 250.00 HLCEirl-i^AHK YOU T06:,% e: A.4./ »*> »*F\n i uH}i AFFLICAMT Name /h^ Phone (home) Phone (wor)c) xAAT..mt<be aAi>iad£fu/*£J> atv.M/AV'ZA-rA- zip< TTSU (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (wor)c) Address:city:.Zip* OSSCKZFTIOa OP RBQOBST Estimated Construction Cost $^jdd(? ~ Describe request in detail: jirpn / a^^Aee. m^ywrMSD^AA IF i ^a/s ^TrrtCHeS£u VAAZAKSS sagi Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lo^ Coverage y Setback: X Front Side _X _ _ Average La)seshore Other (specify) ■AFDSSlF/mSClUFTXINi OP OMOSOAL FKKPSSTT COHDXTXOI pis.: ,ife.' ----- : ------------------- Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property cOfidltipas preventing ccaapllance with Zoning Code reoui rewents: ^4e#rs&X>_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _'jta Sf^< (attach additional sheets if necessary)lUlQOIRXD SUBMITTALS ^ ^ Qf folloiH"o Inforaaliiop lust be aobnitted by the application |ii order for yoar application to ba considered conpletet 1. 2. Complatad Application Form i > k- iiv -: I -'■V^V ikvv;''3 1> !»’ Cartifiad Proparty Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 34t-3271). 3. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4, Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8*i"xll" for $• reproduction)• Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8>j"xll''). <« Sketches or plans of floor t elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%**xll"). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. •*Additional items as ray be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please rssisad>er that voor variance application is not complete if the above Ima not been incloded. A»niXCAIIT*S 816MATUKB The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information aopplled is true and cox^se^F to the best/tof his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signatur Date r/^ ______SI6MATDIIB The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorises reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants# egonta# Cossalssion nesd>ers# and Council p^bbers for purposes of investiga- tioil and verificationc33iS^his requ< OWher's Signature Date A(hpii6ant must have all sufmilteals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Coamiiasion Meeting. Planning Coseiission Meetings are held on the Bllird Monday of each month.* Applicants aumt be present at all scheduled tdlPieif meetings of the Planning Cemwission and Council. If an applicant is MMSble to attend a scheduled meeting# please make arrangements to have an authorised agent attend in your place and to advise the Building s Zoning Ctffice of this change prior to the meeting. s ■ V"e •V:- rv-.- fel.rp II ■ \m it-- m 1 yL u 5! Variance Application Supplement DATES May 21, 1991 TOi Planning Commission and City Council Members FRONt James and Amy Laing REt OM P.I.D. #38 02-117-23 31 0012 A review of our property survey and proposed identified the need for three setback variances proceed with our plans. additions has if we are to The underlying issue arises from the fact that we are living in a RR-IB single family residential zoning district, requiring a minimum lot sise of 2 acres, whereas, the lot we are proposing to develop on (Minnetonka Bluffs Block 13, lots 22, 23, 24) is less than one-half acre in size. X will address each Variance separately and circtimstances unique to the property and request. explain the 7lie proooscKl family room and attached garage addition on the enclosed plans %«ould require two variances. I would like to address the set-back along the north side of the property (Dickenson St.) first. The current garage is sot so close to the street that cars parked in the driveway stick out into the road. As a result, cars driving by are required to steer around these obstacles. This is further complicated by our garage being situated on the crest of a hill and an alley and neighboring driveway entering Dickenson at approximately this same location. In addition to the congestion, the garage and cars obscure the vision of drivers leaving the alley. There was an accident at precisely this location two years ago. By placing the garage back an additional 20 feet and changing our entrance to the garage to enter and exit from the alley, all of these safety concerns could be eliminated. Finally, although the proposal places the new family room and garage 20 feet from the property line, in reality it would be ai^roximately 3S feet back from the edge of the Dickenson St. The second variance issue relates to the property line to the east along the alley, what is unique to this situation is that we also own the property (lots 1,2,3) to the east. It has been recoamended we begin proceedings to legally combine all 6 lots for tax purposes (if allowed). If %#e are siKrcessful there will not be a need for a variance. asii WX-: i:'n.; .I?: m >t P'-.- fT; . is'<- . K'. ?ilS fc- ■■ ■# #1' %3i U-. / ^ Hay 21, 1992 Pag« 2 Variance Appliactlon rf .. a If tie are not permitted to combine the lots, we are very willing to take the necessary steps to legally "bind* lots If2,3 to lots 22,23,24 so that they may never be sold independently. As a final note, I do not believe this addition could be added anyxdiere on the property without a set->back variance unless it was built to the south which would require us to cut do%m several very mature trees. The third variance issue involves the 50 foot setback reqiiiresMnt from Orono Orchard Road on the front («#est) of our property. The rationale for the location of the bedroom addition to the south is primarily based on the contour of the property. Our property is located in a depression, receiving considerable run-off from rain and snow from the north and south. To minimise the effect from the north, the city installed drain pipes to redirect the flow. Hotrever, to the south the problem persists and we have installed drain tile to keep our basisaent dry. If we were to attempt to satisfy the setback requirements and locate the addition to the east of the proposed location, it would place it in a depression where standing water results frcmi run-off. Finally, the the new addition %fould be 43.7 feet from the west property line and approximately 54 feet from Orono Orchard Road. X appreciate everyone's tisie and consideration in this matter. Please let me know if I can provide any additional information. '1 i -NT' ‘ V--‘‘ ' '*aJ :W “i -‘r! Ml..- ‘i - ^'r- i fits'*'It M * •: S!:$- ■ ''fe- ^ ■iyS. f'J ' v§iite,n*^s’v . ifcyE* ■ If ■ S-. i -'fli'' ',C- i ■:; •>' il.- 'Ip- f"feS. ■»|>v !‘lf';'#t ‘V’* I- z'*»ss. ,...,, S'i-i'.,-V» ife •"■. •-’Ti'.j fefto' -i: . % ■'■V'. *i: V- • •.■^•- - •.!■■ t ^ • - sM S'S ;^i-"’-* *'^ f-' ■Siif--'':fi:"4S<^/'i: -i-p K„. c .ii-’--»v>U.v ■Siffc Jm ■■■ ■ “ ■ vte: lii !^s' I i’|i Im 9i» X s Wi Iliir*|i i/l # Iff in o-4 - -,uii; aX**oiMill VI 9 VI o hi lliii; Si *3!i!5I r-m «• m «4 A »>! 9 ri5 I 5 » 8 8 13 S I ‘ •: ■I 1 i- :?fil i> »I 1^ P f- ft'- ^ ^ A :^,-)i!;: , !i r> 5-« ■■ V^v. »te'S , ■ ''■vV'v-^ :• -V }.! .*■ ‘ •4. •»* .• • ' ■«lr f', -jiV*' •‘•■■^ *'■ • ■ ■ '••'■*■ ' ’ 1 * ••'1 \ •wi'V:/--; V - •• •' * , • • < • • . t * '>■' ^cJ .• ' '-1 '■ .‘' *'V. * *- > ..........^ . vW- .' < ' V « F‘ ''' ■ ' *' ^ ’‘ i li-fc^’'-'; -ir,trkjt0nt i,- :4 "■*■> - ■ :,^^; ^ m \ ■•*■ ^jg^iif.-, • . ■ ^•• mm t - rr’-"V ^^y.y 'Tfc-:-. ♦ ■■ ' i ^ r , ■ •• i p'%'ll:' ifeif i0(%'m^M -i^..■■. . n - V^' '■- ':,i|r - fsr ;V--fri^- ■ c» A/C*2«»w'lie cc 180 v>j .♦••t « •T, r i. « .*•'> \ : 1 1 i « ^':3 M • 0 V ■• - * ♦ ------------- ^■•»a ^ •(P 1 1 1 1 1 V ^^‘ ' ^ '< O IT N . • • % A k a I ^ rK >S ^ ^ r V /»7 NO'2^ A, N 0*ZS' *i 0yT^ ;. J O .i'' y>i > iocc m ^ 0 * ■f'l -r-; ■■i s -1 ; \ I \ #■V. if?-.- ^':.-v. '--Vrf i=-r: e? ■ 'i fr I#'-' ^w-i^^-i - '<■ Il'fv ft: W |li^lp<0r^ \y:: .:^ipi- ’S-.' i -'»/ .^4 ite }*V,^ ■ pK* •.’V/-4>►' *i.^ . lf '4^^-^:-' ;. ,•■: -^' s. jK^i^-ii^-..-V'''t‘ • .; :>jiV ’'/r? ' ■ feft, ^ m. \.:;;*s#-/' M M'.pi^^ :.'s ■ mmwM: Sft ■ * I J .U >- iiJ CC oo GO ui:o u.o ■;,l i.V<r' -.^ %' n •*—>.. -1 •-L .1.r) -J% * X -«:oo O J cr C^l ‘Nl C4 ,NT. VV "4 >• 5 / ^ * *.4 v-ft. u r.no %• # ’ w IB • V o; $ - ‘y .;-«L- ..y O w. as .“ n ■D V. — O >. w li .*3 > — • /*» ;«i *.as ® 5 - t*i <n c'» ~ 'j r •- 1) r:*y i; — / < f »r*-’ ►; '•v:/:t 4» ♦- t' ■ iR I*% L»^ rs .■<.;5V»4?r. ^m ». <5 .5 >'^V yf • • • • • • 1« n c j: -i u M « *Ij S o a; r .t: -j c ^ r- ii'% 3 •Ji5 «•> VI u 5.1 -.t »» “• • • .▼J 4- U'>rs A • ix*•V C*'J c • • i. r o c • « V •> fC X i_ ••• 4) 2» s. o J3 •••« •• % • • (.1 S ^ ,-. ?! • ^r':Vv7^*v ;u ^ :- ... - • ■.»..J1Wfcf.!|{ _• ■:'...;..’'"r'«*^. ,/ ' "Jl -,! A- <"f:. ' ' *» ■# ■W::V^ r‘.^ '■ 4 „ —r-..-,-nr■ri,»i:»-';t f - jy - -i-T /.. /=:'M'•<1' ; ,*x • . tv ■ ■. LH>-m. 'w..% ‘■'Wit'i'l; 1 Ife pv"'"'b <Vv- teft*w w INNOVATIVE MICROGRAPHICS to assure quality, this is a RET KE OF PRECEDING DOCUMENT i :e / i? ’i'mm Ai I'g 1rJ.:# # ^•<:■', K,.>■; iit-^pf.-.. te'-’t K » Ip* & ■‘ir '■■fi-;:. mm iilil't' i:4. U:m.:- f^i- ■ ^;‘Sli''1-T'ilSi| t-r'W ?'"■'■ mm- P:Si?’, . . Pfe: ■ •%"' liPS' '^v A,W5#V,.. < •- £^A-re 11 m-m- vpS’'' ^b; "' V mmM. ii ' ♦•- , - •*’?,.» *•• •' .‘ i »" ..*• i ?5^ ’If.' l-c A? tlv''': . PFT- ■ m^‘ ir'ii" ^,'';-,'"V;,-V ■ir ■f-4' 'i ■ : «• ,i;'i :'o f»ru • ;fff'v*i-'ts‘?,; te^"-?lSi iT,' K^’ ^<.■■R' -'• * Vir. . > ' 'v > M1. .is;- iir A 33 I i § s lUI s t ■5 5S§ ^i|§s§® »5 s ki r? pgo 2 ts S i r s e l,j\w 3 , ‘i ' V‘'*‘’ . *1 A. •i •j sol ; - ■1ms:■ ']o .) o :: ■ ■ im, n 2! O i ■D ;) SO '.i 0|2 \ , 1 l'o CO :i ■i A >r". j Sli.'* i 'V ■ ■ V ' x._ ...t : v^^acia,.. >X- M''’•■ ■•• few# — iir p.' ■: tip fm '>c ‘f^ ■' -iV'-m ■ • s|j? ''■ %n, =«■. ¥'ji./-= -' ’Kf r .«!» m i'*'-?W»" pip pe?:^ - W ** " v'4-xi. -V i„: I# S z ii /*•, <• ’ jW CJ1_ o rri o < O ■n z 20 O Z SO o o O 33 X Omi z s(/) so o cqP H t - P 'S ’-■«4 1 i >« :S r‘‘' fail I laycfll fit ?sv S=- # --J -> 'kf^'*‘ T:. w- ■ ■ ‘< ; ‘ kir;^;: i: ■ :■: ^^.:^v ?HV<vr • • :r . . . -h *M%K ’V ■• - -imwL. Jfft,1^. p^w» i- . ■f-7- ^ ,y... fr". 'ifc A g t A z 'r ■iiI iiniw-daii.4,1 ;ij -, W^*m 'mTM i mV ? > -IW »' « Tos Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse» City Administrator Froa: Dates Subject s <5s / ■ ‘k%. #1743 Albert Hanser, 1685 Fox Street - Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing ''o. Smilag Districts RR>*1B, Rural residential« 2 acre minimum Total Area - 29.14 acres exclusive of road right-of-way (15.76 wet, 13.38 dry) Lot 1 - 7.3 acres (4.02 dry, 3.28 wet) Lot 2 10.43 acres (4.8 dry, 5.63 wet) Lot 3 - 12.10 acres (5.25 dry, 6.85 wet) Pertlaeat Ordinances (All ordinances reviewed under Application ♦1721, 5-lot plat) 1.Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B). RR-IB Rural Residential Lot Standards. 2.Section 10.56, Shoreland Regulations. A.Recreational Development La)ce - Tanager La)ce Structural setback * 100' Septic setback « 75' B.Seti^ack from wetland. Browns Bay watershed (Section 1..55, Subdivision 8) Structural setback * 26* Septic setback “ 75* 3. Chapter 11, Subdivision Regulations. Ust of libits A - Application B - Proparty Owners List C - Plat Map D-*l-4 - Hardcover Fact Sheets (Proposed Lot B - Hardcover Nap F - DNR Letter 4/23/92 0 - Revised Prelininary Plan Beview of Curreat Application 0f V Applicant has resubaitted a subdivision of a 3-lot plat. Proposed Lot 1 reasins the same as in the original 5-lot review. All original hardcover calculations submitted are still valid for oiifi ’snt review (Review Exhibits D-1 —4 and E). Each lot we^l eRceeda the lot standards of the RR-IB toning district and ^loreland Regulations. Previous septic testing remains valid for I. u> . ^ .... 1.. t. .la wm fi ■•••• ill' -f ¥■-' ' # wJ'W 'fe. r, ’T- *•: f . ' S'' . i:C- w .ifellai'-' %G y- - ■ . 4pi fllfc ' iiv" Wit %<x: toning File #1743 Jtmo 8, 1992 Pago 2 thm proposed 3-lot subdivision. The City still has concern that (•ptic test sites be protected prior to developenient of Lots 2 and 3. The City must receive written confirmation that there is edaguate area to serve guest house use as it is still the intention of the applicant to maintain guest house. The Planning Comiaaion nay decide that septic test confirmation can bo provided at the time of a conditional use permit review. gihe original review by the Park Commission will remain still in effect. The decision of the Park Commission at their March 2nd meeting waa to obtain cash in lieu of land. The current 3-lot application involves a request to use a driveway to serve Lots 2 and 3 rather than being required to install a private road. The access off the driveway serving Lot I is a secondary access facilitating access to tennis court and detached garage structure. In consideration of the DNR's review comments for the 5-lot plat (review Exhibit F) and the preliminary 'omments of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District^ Staff will ask for detailed road plans for private drive if the City approves applicant's requests for a driveway versus a private road installation. As of this writing, the City has not received applicant's request to use drive rather than private road. Some of the findings noted by applicant's consultant at an earlier meeting are as follows: 1. Minisiise impact on sensitive area. 2.Based on proposed house locations, single driveways minimise visual impact on adjacent residence on Pox Street• 3.Secondary access off driveway serving Lot 1 is a secondary or accessory access where majority of visitors to property use principal access drive located to west side of property. •taff leeammendatiM To recosusend approval of the 3-lot plat subdivision application of Albert Banser for the property located at 1685 Fox Street finding all standards of the RR-IB, Shoreland Regulations and On-Site Septic Code have been satisfied. This approval is B^jeet to the following conditions: 1.Applicant Street. to dedicate 33* of right-of-way for Pox 1 i ■ i u >s pfetr." i: t-- iffe; ■ Ii%i'fciA||«w« K?' 1. •vfv WMm l||i. Mr'0 ,tl^- • i^.y- .. ' Zoning Juno 6 Pago 3 File #1743 , 1992 5. 6. 7. iai4 ■■ ■ I- '■■ ,' .-• • . ■’ fU lav •V '■ ■■ yS^ ...lii Applicant to grant Flowage and Conservation Eaaement over all designated wetlands within the plat. Wetlands to the north and east of the property to be designated at the 932.3 elevation. This shall also include area defined as low wooded area within proposed Lot 2. Septic test sites within Lots 2 and 3 shall be staked prior to reguired land alterations for road and drainage improvements. Structure located within Lot 2 close to west lot line shall be removed prior to final plat approval. On-site Septic Manager shall be advised of time of removal to ensure there is no damage done to the septic test sites on Lot 2. Applicant shall file a separate conditional use permit for guest house use as structure will continue to be used for non-rental residential use. The following improvements or structures are recognized as non-conforming based on either their ^substandard setback to the shore of Tanager Lake or to the designated wetland. All structural repairs to these non-conforming structures shall require approval of the City of Orono. The non-conforming structures are as follows: a. Guest house on Lot I. b. Detached garage on Lot 1. c. Tennis court on Lot 1. Based on the Planning Commission’s resolve of the access issue* the City will accept the original road plans submitted for private road construction for 5-lot plat or if a driveway is to be permitted* the City will ask for plans for the driveway to ensure positive drainage is maintained per DNR and «C*WD standards. The City Engineer will bo asked to review and approve the driveway plans prior to inst< *lation of road to ensure guidelines are satisfied. Applicant's f®*****^^**'^^ asked for a refund of the private road fees submitted with 5-lot plat. The City will wait until the City Engineer has completed his review of the 3-lot plat before a refund is determined. Sening Pile *1743 auly 6, 1992 MAdditieaal Exhibits 8 • Applicant's Addendum I - Park Commission Minutes 3/2/92 J - Drainager Utility and Trail Easement K - Survey of Existing Road and Proposed Private Road at Entrance to Subdivision JMMitional CosBsnts and Planning Conmission Ra ndation Members questioned the status of the non-conforming structures set forth by staff noting chat it was their understanding that the tennis court and detached garage were to be removed as a result of final subdivision approval. Staff advised that there was discussion concerning the removal of the two structures but it was never incorporated in the formal approval recommendation. Members also oiiestioned applicant's consultant as to why a conditional use permitlo: ... - - ,or the continuation of the guest house use had not been completed as Of ti.is date. Applicant advised that the conditional use permit for l>|ie guest house use would be filed within the next month. Staff can “ confirm that the guest house conditional use permit has been filed with the City and will be considered by the Planning Commission at their July 20th meeting. The guest house is also classi ied as a non- conforming structure because of a substandard setback to Tanager Lake end side setback (required • 30', existing ■ 10'). The Planning Commission conditioned approval of the proposed 3 isM lot subdivision now on the removal of the non-conforming detached " garaee and tennis court as it is apparent that in the original 1minstallation of the tennis court that it was necessary to fill in the ad^aoeat wetland. Mesd>ers also noted that the tennis court is often inundated with runoff from the overflow of the adjacent wetlands. Vlease review the minutes enclosed in your packets of the June 15th Planning Commission meeting. One of the reasons sited for requiring renewal was the fact that the existing and a proposed private road S^mld encroach the 26* required setback from the 932.3 elevation. Rewiew txhibit K. Please note the existing driveway does not encroach the 26* setback nor will the proposed private road. I Xb reviewing the Park Commission minutes of the March 2nd ____it should also be noted that Park Commission seeks not only money in lieu of park lands but asks for the standard bike easement over the 10' drainage and utility easement that aouts Fox Street, •toff has enclosed a copy of the easement recently completed for the Perk C<muiission*s use by the City Attorney's office. Exhibit J. Per Council's recent directive concerning the Sweetser subdivision, an Od9oota»nt in the park dedication fee will be made with acquisition of bike ' ‘m. VAm ____easMant. It is not clear if a representative of the Bansers %ias present at the Park Commission nor whether written notice had been provided of their action. A copy of the easaownt and Park Commission miautes have been sent to both applicant and applicant's consultants. m ' M i -"VT-"Pit"Ww^:.^V'mm ' fe:If i«iing Pile #1743 Jp:a;^ly 6# 1992encloeed approval resolution has been drafted per the Commission's approval recosnendation. Staff will amend tha pl^ tasolotion upon final resolve of the issue of the removal of the non- eonfOCTiiiig structures, tennis court and detached garage. The Planning ] Commission granted a variance to Section 11.33, Subdivision 4 that pij^lfOttld allow a driveway to serve the 3 lot subdivision. The necessary If U findings have been incorporated in the approval resolution. liij» m mmm m- mw *•'! ■ .. •tv#, iimsm L#:*fe-- iiwp- ^■1 ••. • . . •^1 vll A ABSOUITIOII GRAniHG PlUn.IMlllAKr APPROVAL OP A THREB LOT PLAT POR TBB PROPERTY LOCATED AT litS POE STREET PILE RO. 1743 9t i>ai (hereinafter "the applicant”) on May •J* fil«d a fornial subdivision application with the City for approval residential plat of property legally described in Exhibit A attached (hereinafter the property")j and published and mailed notice in accordance with 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and i» ?i21 ^*'® Planning Commission held a public hearing on June t?ili times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this Af^lication were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and ^4 4... ,4 RRPRRAS, at their regular meeting held on July 13, 1992 the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of the applicant, noting the following findings of fact: appxx.ant. 1. 2. 3. 4. The property is located within the RR-IB Single Family Rural "••ioontial Zoning District requiring a minimum of two acres of contiguous dry bulldable land within each newly created lot. The property contains a total of approximately 29.14 acres. All of the proposed residential lots meet the required 2 acre drv contiguous land area as follows: ^ Lot I • 4.02 acres dry Lot 2 ■ 4.88 acres dry Lot 3 • 5.25 acres dry. All lots have been found to have adequate area for both principal on-.it. ..ptlc ly.t... Th. applicant's consultant, have provided septic test information to confirm these findings. with th. .Kistinq r.sld.nc. shall rstaio an ®®Lsting secondary curb cut based on the following findings: ®» curb cut meets siting requirements for a road at a 35mile per hour speed limit. Page 1 of 6 :i h th Dd im no t. il II ry a t« 'a v4 1 • i - ''ft* J■:iA ,>:-■ ',j ■v^: b.The access drive has existed on the property for many years and has never been a safety issue. c.The existing circular drive serves not only a functional purpose but helps to maintain the estate-like character of this unique property. 5.All newly created lots have been found to meet th»j standards of Ordinance #101, 2nd Series, an ordinance establishing regulations for the aanagement of shore lands within the City. All proposed structures will meet the required 100' setback measured at the 929.4 elevation of Tanager Lake, designated by the DNR as e recreational development lake. All septic systems are to be located 75' from the 929.4 elevation. 6.All lots have been found to meet the standards of the RR-IB Rural Residential Zoning District. All pro{.osed residential structures will need a 26' setback from the wet ands located at the 932.3 elevation and all septic systems will meet the required 75' from the 932.3 elevation. 7.There is no need to provide future road extensions to the south* east or west because of the location of the railroad to the south, Tanager Lake shoreline to the south and west, extensive wetland area to the east and north, and steep topographies and heavily treed areas to the isusediate west. ■OH, TBRRBFORB BE IT RBSOLVBD, that based upon one or more of the indings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves he preliminary plat application of Albert D. Hanser per the survey dated etober 1, 1991, revised May 21, 1992, by Mark S. Grorberg of Coffin t ronberg, Inc. and grants a variance to Section 11.33, Subdivision 4 that ottld allow a driveway to serve a three lot subdivision where the code ould require a private road based on the following flndingsi 1 ik e The location, the proposed density at 3 unit per 30 acres and the fact that there is no need to acquire future road access or extensions to the east, south or west reduces need for private road installation. 2.The installation of a driveway will minimize the impact on the removal of trees within this hea/ily wooded area of mature trees* Page 2 of 6 mmm miw 3.Th« shared driveway is consistent with the pattern of developMnt on the north and south aides of Fox Street where more than »wo estate-like residences are served from a private driveway. Approval of the preliminary subdivision is subject to the following conditionss V- -' ■ 1. Applicant to dedicate 33' of right-of-way for Pox Street 2.Applicant to grant a flowage and conservation easement over all designated wetlands within the plat (wetlands within the north and east of the property to be designated at the 932.3 elevation). 3.Lot 1 shall retain use of an existing separate access to the west of the future shared driveway and a secondary access off the private driveway to serve Lots 2 and 3. 4.Septic test areas on Lots 2 and 3 are to be staked prior to required land alterations for private driveway or drainage improvement. 5. r;Sr. structure located between shared lot lines of Lots 1 and 2 shall be resioved prior to final plat approval. On-site septic manager •hall be advised of time of removal to insure there is no damage done to the septic test sites on Lot 2. Applicant shall Install a swale between Lots 2 and 3 to drain low retention area adjacent to proposed septic sites. i.Applicant shall file a separate conditional use permit for guest house use as structure will continue to be used for noM-rental. residential use. 7.fhe following improvements or structures are recognised as non conforming based on either their substandard setback to the shore of Tanager Lake* or to the designated wetland or tc existing lot lines. Structural repairs to non-conformining structures require approval of the City of Orono. . This section to be amended pet Council*s final direction concerninu status of tennis^court an? detaciie<r earaae. Page 3 of 6 'i.- mi ■ te i ** SA'- ff ^■H:- "' PA m ■ H..‘-■;v. >':^ljr- :-.; C • Wpi. mP. Ar^'‘ :■■ "C:I' Ur - '•#?: 4 ' ■ ■f;^- 'rr- ifiit' m I ‘“i'v' ■■'^•c' 8.Applicant to grant a bike trail easement over 10’ drainage and utility casement adjacent to Pox Street to be designated and dedicated on the final plat. The subdivision has been referred to the City Assessor for determination of the value of the property in its undeveloped state so that a park dedication fee can be determined. An adjustment in the fee will be made for acquisition of an easement for a 10' wide Dike trail. Required improvements: Building permits will not be issued for new construction until the plat is granted final approval and filed with Hennepin County. In addition, all improvement plans involving private driveway and drainage isiprovesients must be approved by the City Engineer before applicant can comience construction. All drainage and driveway improvements must be installst* and approved by the City Engineer for safe use by municipal inspection vehicles before building permits will be issued. Applicant ■hail provide plans for private driveway construction and the installation of culverts, etc. for review by the City Engineer and such improvements ohall meet standards of the MCWD. FINAL PLAT SUBMITTALS The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Soning Bdaiinistrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month: A. RECORD PLAT drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to l"-200'. Drawing to include: a)Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Coffin and Gronberg, Inc. dated October 1, 1991, revised May 21, 1992. Dedication of *drainage and utility easements* 10* wide along all perimeter property lines and 5* each side of Internal property lines - omit along the shoreline and wetlands . Designation and dedication of a drainage easement over wetlands and drainage ways within Lots 1, 2 and 3, Designation of Tanager Lak» at the 929.4 contour and Browns Bay wetlands at the 932.3 contour. Page 4 of 6 I IM mm-ism- »;■ W’fs-H?:.^‘*13?m- P-|yis-lq»'SIS# te ‘.nm^WSvi it V# / fetp, 115f^^--= ift #iiipf liS -*#r:S Dedication of 33' right-of-way for Pox Street. B. C. d) LEGAL DOCUMENTS required: a)Title opinion addressed to t-he City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by r interest. The applicant oust prO'/ide certified copies- cf all recorded easements currently affecting the property. Signed and executed Flowage 6 Conservation Easement over the wetland/drainage ways and lake. Please refer to easement enclosed. Signed and executed Drainage, Utility and Trail Easement to be taken over the 10' drainage and utility easement that is adjacent to Pox street. FEES TO BE PAID: Total Due *$325.00 a) Final plat fee « $175.00 b) c) Legal review and filing fees of 3150.00 *Park Commission shall accept park fee in lieu of lands. The City Assessor has been asked to determine the fair market value of the undeveloped lands within the subdivision so that a park dedication fee can be determined. Tnis fee shall be adjusted based on the acquisition of a bike trail easement along Fox Street. Applicant will be advised as soon as Rolf Erickson, the City Assessor, has sutaitted his findings. i; j j I Page 5 of 6 > *•' ■ ■■ ' ’>■."" 3^- Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota regular TOeting held this 13th day of July, 1992. at a Barbara A. k'eterson, Mayor m- ATTBSTs fc: Dorothy Mailin, city clerk iTATB OP HIMIIESOTA ODOHTY OF RBNHEPIN ) )88. ) '■-i - . The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of July# 1992, by Barbara A, Peterson & Dorothy M. Rallin, Mayor * Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation end iestmeent was executed on behv'f of the City. 13th City said 3-'^- #■ ^ - Notary Public My Comsiission Expires Page 6 of 6 •slfe'-V ’''- " ■ JI ■ 4 :_i 1 -4 \ •i iiiMi- I V;-’''^■'f i*^:. ■••’’’M""*m-y..--t1^ ^ii«.^ %i.PIS, mmm S|!f’fe:::»' ». .11'J' WMf - . M- ^©i? : :, "4’W’w:^ m ■i iiiS©'jSSMism$.-S-. i£& U.. ?5r iiiis^',•«': EXHIBIT A Th« EttSt half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, except the West 114 feet thereof, in Section 3, Township 117 North , Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian. ALSO That part of Government Lot 4, Section 2, Township <17 North, Mange 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Government Lot 4; thence East along the North line of said Lot a distance of 494 feet; thence Southerly, deflecting to the right 88 degrees a distance of €5t.*9 feet; thence Easterly, deflecting to the left 38 degrees OS minutes a distance of 123.0 feet; thence Southerly, - 7 * deflecting to the right 88 degrees 05 minutes a distance of 23.4 feet; thence Southwesterly, deflecting to the right 57 degrees 05 minutes a distance of 98.5 feet; thence Southeasterly, defIcctinq to the left 90 degrees 08 minutes to the Northwesterly right-of-way line of the Great Northern Nailway (now known as Dakota Rail, Inc.); thence.South- iwesterly along said right-of-way line to the South line of said Government Lot 4; thence West along said Souch line to the West line of said Gove r niaen t * Lot 4; thence North along said west line to the point of beginning. - vS -i r • e 4 m\ A '1 ■" .. .. . . . . . .. . -S-.. . . -1 -aA t &■■Sit^.-^"entorm. ’i~r MIONO - WHSmUt LOCATION O - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION 7 / SitN Addreas M^S" /f’^X TrA^^r k propalfty Idantlfication Number (P.I.D.) tlMS# Check one ~ Property abstract or torrens? V r.i httmt^i lefal description to application i*..’ABIUeAMT Msm A ^/^A/S€A Phone (hone) Phone (work) Siv*'-?;,:-mMW’M Address i /{fS /Vat A (if different than applicant)* Nesie * :%a^€_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ city; di/jr^ATA Phone (home) __ Zip: SfS^/ Phone (work) #Address:City;Zip: (ettaeli list it more than one)I ft (.* \jt utf<m e’*~" #BXstxwi iand on ll# %t ■? VOBber of Tax Parcels Development Size Litr 1350200000‘''r mmx400, /y. /X. 76 im§ I 7^. 6Z Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels liECLIP'HHm WU T/V./vw'vi V wrvt a «A\'A ri?tf i !<01 m:■rr/nr/C i Present Use (check)X Residential! no. of units Other (specify) Present Zoning District X Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites ‘ l’ -VivXV e list' '; vifiv.'' Flp ; ■■ i:WK ' >er of Building Sites:/ T Existing Units New Units Total Units Proponed Gross Density; Miniaitai Lot Size; Proposed Use: (check) Units perAcres — *r frA(€T ^ Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land X Residential Other (specify) # Iff MUTERIAL NECSSSARY FOR COMPLETE PRBLIHINARY APPLICATION Coaplettd Application Forsi Praliainary Plat information on Certificate of Sur'/ey. Cartifiad Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of aay other persons you wish notified of this application. tartifieation by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is lata. Official's Signature Date . Ir eSf’’'• I. ■■ l^aymant of fees (par)c fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). Sigaad certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. Title opinion. Eaaaments* Covenants, etc. Davalopars Agreement and Letter of Credit. artifieation by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. suing Official's Signature Date 1^- V ' ■'" If Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement H a » freliminary Review (class I & II Subdivision) Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) 5150.00 250.00 250.00 300.00 -»• 20.00/Lot I-..',-Pinal flat Review (Class III) «Cflus any legal or engineering charges) 150.00* mIS applieant hereby agrees to provide all information required or ^^^igueeted by the zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, uumiag Conedlssion and Council necessary to ^process this application and UPtber agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. '•’V Date nap's Signature Date pit pent wist have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the enslng Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the iSS MemSey of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled gimm meetings of tiM Planning Commission and Council. If an ac^lieant is ibl# te attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an fisn of agent attend in your place and to advise the building f Zoning this change prior to the meeting. if'. i JiM liM' ■ zar/yMtA//fK HARDCOVER CALCULATIOIl WORKSHEET :Kv. ■J^a- h. >A ■/ (./« ^:r i SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' i Existing Hardcover in Zone A. ■ H ouse LENGTH mm:r. :’ ^..4' • •r ttfcM -3* Garage • •* M* c. D riveway 0.. SI DEWALK • '•, ■ * yy\ '•^i» yy^y ■.P ' 'Pfe rr I. Patio / D eck p. Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN lY . . ^my. PLASTIC- ' SHEETING • • I • '"V y 0. Other X WIDTH Total Hardcover in Zone S t F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.P. S • P • _o3-7'<fz -i S.P. _ pif Total Propirty Aria in Zonc iif^raa i 0 0 I y’m0- ••. V mm m •bl2^l^££^ X 100 -% a»» . • mm* *«%r . •• ■■’K>!i■ii a I .'V .'i . i i ■> •j 'i ■■4 'M H % SPrf wk ''p' •• ii#:-- & rIMl. '-.is® ’’■;Y i> * iXII- .'ftcm. .-. --i ^ ‘ - ;■« ~M-. - . . -. i¥'‘m- . A i *.j' 1- ’•-• '^V '■'r;;^ xW s^ - ■' 'f4 jp£' U. 1.0 r /^ //jjL/fe^ HARDCOVER CALCULATIOH WORKSHEET S5T5ACK zohe: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' <75^25^) 250-500' 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone »• -• A. ■ House • • ’r\ I. Garage • • ••• c. Driveway X 0.. S t oewalx E. Patio/ 3ecx p.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN iV . . PLASTIC- SHEETING . X *m ■ • • m -0 t • G. Other S3 so LENGTH WIDTH A • • * * C4ifsr H0iiS€ 3l • 1 X 2f. 2 ^OB <9VO ^ • Total H ardcover in Zone Ji €^t S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. s - S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. Total P*o»*«ty Aria ik Zon .St.iao 1 (Tj TL££Li££X 100 -22 S.F. S.F. ss A T• X- ■' % mm mm \ • 0 • • 4 .'A - r*• r* # % fi ■-. i'jiL--1 j: : , S'"' ... m '■■} . : . Ilhillii. y, i i': ;..-m 'll ■'Vi mm T'il I .'J 'i! ,i- :•! 1 m ".'T*’^-"1 •— S= - '^V'-JI^- •■:■} . ; • li;A- ® 4 Mi,, ■ Sj|0^" ■ 0^. »■' |i£‘’ ^ tif : , - 4!0m\ . > ^ ■y ■ " & -f S^if;-‘i.r >- ^v-lll--*. *•- Ti'ftV' , -n - ^r: i I"- ';^§y :aWL <;■ . Tii-'.. ■'*■' • Ife a y V#f "*■ ‘V. t«Bf V mm HARDCOVER CALCULATIOM WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' O50-500_^ 500-1000 Existing Hardcover in Zone A. House LENGTH 3. Garage c. Driveway ^4Sr D.. Sidewalk e. Patio/ ulecK F. Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY , . PLASTIC * SMEBTtKO - X rtf0mi csua G. Other . //t.E. X _______ X /Z 5 O WIDTH ^30 5SZ o Ssao XP. ^ S.F. : .F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. Total H ardcover in Zone /z ffZ S.r . T otal Property Area ik Zone y/A /oo t S.F. rn /z9fz Am/y<,y.gg ~ii2^-7-92 X 100 • ^ • • . ♦ my<'m:mM^y f * ■; ' ♦*‘ 4:‘ ^ ■w l- .-A li m<iy:' 0i ifS ”|P' , ®gft Si# ■'*' r- ■# i:#M w ■* .f** ti -.'"t .f. 'lit'- W:Mmm iSPW ' m If./ pc> Pife ’*4u '•ai;A- •:■ .mm-.:,j ^ ^;: -■- ■‘■■A-r - r:- m i;^-^ ■ '-I* r..«:-..^’:0Mm- HARDCOVER CALCUUTIOH WORKSHEET _______ SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' f^OO-lOQQl) Existing Hardcover in Zone A. ■ House B. Garage c. Driveway E. Patio/ Deck r. LanoICAPE AREAS UNDERLAIN IT PLASTIC- SHEET INO G. Other % • «. • LENGTH • • D.. Sidewalk • X X . WIDTH /o^o S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. Total Hardcover in Zone IUt£- Total Profcrty A ria in Ions }3^foa t S.F. S.F. Fa B —fTI J//g>g X 100 V.#7 ✓ o . .. ..v Ul--^ f * t '0^ I n f 1 <v. I•iMCl^'1 pi -f ,1 Hi' -A 1 f,fitt;:'5•‘.=v ■-;r tr* ?’ ■t: rr--]’’' f '. 'r'HJi: M iMONtMO. mf ^i‘ ‘‘ »•s« ii4;;.i.m- «!;:■ :;y M' ■j.>- : /?.••;• V ^■P>f ^4V. y-;:, ^>-7.;..-:. ■. y iiy . - f ' '-mm I- . fv-y •- 'fV • 2#^ y\’. % ' r^A^.: '■-« ?b» 2 -- ■-' V^:*' it' -air y‘i:«2fek'; ^ry;^v m4rfty-r : STATf OF /md ^bsotta ^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES MRRO WATERS - 1200 WARMER ROAD, ST. PAUl-r-M*- ®®y|f,,o 772-7910 c L:rr L-a w- April 23, 1992 APR 2 4 KarK Gronbarg coffin « Gronborg, Inc. 492 TaMraek Avonuo Long Lako, HM 55336 REt AL HANSER SUBDIVISION, WETLAND 27-859W, CITY OF OROMO, I^»IN COUNTY (SE 1/4, SE 1/4, S.3, T.117N, R.23W) boar Mr. Gronbarg: I hAV* ravlawad th« sketch plsn (4/6/92 revision) and proposed road daalon (dated 3/7/92) for the above-referenced project would not ehai>«o the hydraulic c^PRcfty of «>• this of flea aboulG ba consultad. pXaaaa contact aa at 772-7910 should you hava furthar quastiona ragaroxng this aattar. Sinearaly, Call ftrauaa Araa Mydrologiat CCS Jaanna Nabuatb, City of orono Ron Quanback, Minnahaha Craak WSD Tanagar Laka (27-14IP) file Orono aboraland fila *N fOUAc o«»oaTu»irrv f‘4Riovfs i ■i j -'=2 j,;v. :,%i'?'’>«^mr'' V'.'-^zata Office 315 Ea.*lak» V\'«yut«. NUN' 5SM1 6U/473-J000 i Fax 612/473-3tJ2 JP'^ Im tium '''iKSS}' ■ V •: ><|i W::i-M. ■-'Wt- i% -' iff i ssS^il M ■ !rri!if- f'-u VP-®"'' v' '■■' =P',:v :^v Ammrn is*i D«t« To: Rt: June 12. 1992 Planning and City Council Members Hanaer Subdivision Redraft - 1685 Fox Street > I aa writing to you with regards to redraft of the Manser Subdivision. vour review of the Aa you can see. we are changing from a five lot to three lot subdivision. a TheThe Mansers have a buyer for the easterly portion. Saneers and the buyer are particularly pleased with the Qew configuration because they are able to retain more of the natural beauty, privacy, and numerous large trees on this special piece of land. Mr. Manser is also hoping you will continue to allow him to keep his current driveway to his home. There is car- cmlllly enough frontage along Fox Street to safely allow this* The approach to his hone from the west entrance is very natural and pleasing. He ere excited about this turn of events, both for the involved parties end the resulting protection of the integrity of the natural environment of this lovely land. Tkaiik you for your consideration, •incerelyf (emdith Bovell Agent for the Mansers IP’ f:p- 1.,^ -f.. Ipp :iS^ K##', AS. la -i 4 V Il#" - :'X / pllv W ■4 ? W" - ^ ■' i- '■• I- ■ ' 7 %r.Jl • ^,,v: .■ ?'--M ::^: 1 ^r :^- 1 I'W i'';y-:- i ^ : ':^ ^■' ,'v f'”! - k \ ^^'■ I- ‘ •■•■-:. •# •:-i .•I I ■ lit* : IS , -'^' '-. ^ - :■ ;PS ■lip?-- ■',. ' ■:(:■ •■■ t. . <•■.: ••-■ :<i' MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1992 CLIFF OTTEN SUBDIVISION - CONT. W movsd by I Is®, s6cond#d by Johnston, to r®cofnm#nd that If an utility aasament is taken along County Road 6, that a bike trail be added onto that easement. Ayes 7, nays 0. B) ALBERT HANGER Oarhardson noted that this a five lot suodivlsicn, with one axitting raaldence. He suggested they consider a bike trail aatamant along the road. Johnston askad If the topography in that area would allow for a bike traiI. Garhardson noted he currently is applying for a conditional use parmit to widan the shoulder in that area. Johnston asked If th# railroad is expected to remain for a long t imt. Oarhardson no* 'd it currently only serves tne 3M plant in Hutchinson. Johnston stated that it may end up being abandonee and oernaos being usad <n the same manner as the Luce Line Trail. Bradley suggested they adopt as an operating policy the taKing of an additional 10’ for bike trails along roadways. Chair Flint explained he tried to get the Council to sgree w.th that policy, but they felt each application should be reviewed. It was Biovad by Bradley, seconded by Iise, to recommend payment of a park dedication fee for the subdivision proposal by Alpert Hanaar, and to raouast a 10’ bike trail easement to be taken along th# utility easement along Fox Street. Ayes 7, nays 0. (S4) PLAYa’OUNO EQUIPMENT BEOERWOOO PARK Oarhardson passed out a legal opi».ion regarding ada. He stated bids will be opened on March 20th for playground equipment to be located at Bedarwood Park. He stated the opinion suggests there will be no additional requirements for tne equipment for ft montns to 1 year with regards to the new law. Me explained there will be acme requirements on accessibility, but noted modifications could be made later. Chair Flint suggested the sub-committee review the bids and return to the Commission with a recon»nendat i on. a iililiiifT /(i f ■'j i- • '1' k.m y- ift “ifS?'' DRAINAGE. UTILITIES AIJD ZRt\^ \ Kj\SEMEUT THIS INDENTURE, mad® this by and betwaon 19 to as "Grantor<s)and the City of corporation# hereinafter referred tc r.r •« * hereinafter referred a Minnesota municipal ranteo." WITNESS# that Grantor(s)# in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and .alujolc consideration given by Grantee# the receipt of wh. ^ in acVrovrlr iged by Crantrr(«)# do(es) hereby grant, ba iLn ^ a-, convey to Qran'vee# its successors and assigns. i r*' -^cu*! casement for public ingress# egress# and access, for . . \tilltles and trril purposes Lnd uses# over# under and the land in the State of Minnesota# County of Hennepin le'^.ly described as: including# but no 'y way of limitation, a full and free right and authority to enter upon said land to construct# install# siaintaln# operate and repair a sanitary siiwer interceptor# lift Station# main or line# a water main or linis 'travel or paved trail and any and all appurtenances# includi...; drainage control structures# incidental and related thereto# (all of which are b.«reinafter referred to collectively as the improvements). The Grantee shall have the right to make use of said land as is reataonably necessary and advisable to the construction# installation# maintenance# operation and repair of the tiaprovefsents. Xa addition to any other reme ly the Grantee may have# the covenants and restrictions contained herein nay be enforced by injunction* The Grantor(s) certify that the land herein described is free and clear of all encumbrances except: ZN WITNESS WMEEEOr# the Grantor(5) have executed this caaenent on the day and year written above. 10 STATE OF K:NNES0TAcotnmr of hennepin )) ) On thif Mrsoniily tppnarnd ________________________• -- --- - p^ifgon(s) described in snd who signed the fore^oln^ £ng^fuwentt end ecknowled^e ihst they executed same as their free set end deed* _ day of 19_, before mo to me known to be 0mi'.m.m ii’ NOTARY PUBLIC li: •TATS DEED TAX DUE HEREON: This Inetrument la drafted by City of Orono F.O. lox 6f Crystal Say< Minn 99323 &- mmIf* 1-iffowsw '■m *f :* ' v * ife', ¥pm0 l:;;V' V P-ill- -• -• •! : . ifjll'iiidiai ----- 1 4; ■ 1. - 1 m. ^ ^ ■ i ; ' •r-' : / ','H '.I \ m- :M^y •■ " •s-L CXtY OV OROMOt, O. Box C«ZONING PIUS #1743Crystal wmy, mn . 473-7357 55323 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Notice: June 22^ 1992ly.«Ol.. .Albsrt Hanaer 1615 Fox Street NeysatAr MN 55391 COPIES TO:Meredith Howell Burnett Realty 315 East Lake St. Wayzata, MN 55391 'fiW-Mark Gronberg Coffin k Gronberg 482 Tararack Ave. Long Laker MN 55356 mm or miiaaiamt Preliminary Subdivlelon BMS OP ' r ^INGs June 15, 1992 VOTE: 4 For 1 Against yiaBNiag CoMiaaion recoaBenda the following: Ik r mMl Rlanning Coamisaion recommended approval subject to the conditions set forth in the staff memo except to amend Condition 6 whereby the Planning COMiaaion recoauzends that both the detached garige and tennis court be roBOVad aa a condition of the subdivision approval but to allow the guest house to resMiin as a non-conforming structure. Per Meredith Rowell's phone call of June 19th, a copy of conditional use permit application has also been sent to Mark Gronberg with this notice. NOTES JM SCZJIL CONDITIONS: l^>plieaBt'a next scheduled meeting is confiimed at the City Council meeting of July 13# 1992; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. .1flp- mm rnmm^y y ■- ^ - ■mmm ■ .i 4 k ■’i’ * *■ >1, i '• f .•!«• Ip- m- iiW:.f:w0 U^: .’;^v-';:3/ •i?-=-‘;If; •■■ff-’ if-i If. ■f .<tr. V iV- l#t;- miA V mm4 Tos Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City AdministratorFroa:OatesOobjects Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Admi July 9# 1992 %s Iet>.%1990 - 1992 Commercial Marina License - Windward Mari \ Uet of Udiiblte % B:chibit A - License ft Attachments Exhibit B - 1990 - 1992 License Applications Exhibit C - Council Minutes 4/27/92 At your June 22 neeting* Council determined that Windward Marine must pay the full 1991 license fee of $436.ro, waiving the late fee. The full fee was paid June 23. Attached is Windward's license packet, including conditions Of license approval. The license is to be issued retroactive for the 1990 and 1991 license years. Hote that Councilman Callahan on April 27 Indicated to the Council that the Lake Use Committee had determined Windward Narine was in conformance with the requirements for a license. Staff Be cowan list ion Staff recommends approval of a cosusercial dock/marina license for windward Narine# Inc. for license years 1990-1991— 1992# per the attached license documents. BrettoeSMi Hobioni Moved by » seconded by_ _ __ to approve issnaaoe of a cosssercial dock/marina license to Windward Marine# 2nc«# 1444 Shoreline Drive, for the 1990-1991-1992 license years per the attached documents. _ _ _ Ayes# _ _ _ Nays. Isv 'Am 9 4 :|' . I d m ■.Ai ■A ^1 !iv />■ V;-' kl^mr.r^is^-' '" il m§i --; ^ " . : •-- ■ '^r o • ; ^ ^ 5 •? <D^ n W Ul W i _ • o Sto o o s* 5 O O O *< IT n 0o»o 1 ft Ki w S z 1*) *o ^ O < I-* »i^ *-* "* tt ^ ^ 51 st; r2 1 ^h 1 H- < o •— S0 K> S t 1 H ft 0 i-»2394 ?'■r»'„ >.,, 'U'fslllk®-:. .CITY OF ORONOBXBIBIT A LICBNSB NO. 2394 CONDItlOWS OF ISSUANCE FOR ANNUAL COMMERCIAL DOCK LICENSE X* XdCBNSEE _ Windward Marine _ _ _ _ _ __ Address 1444 Shoreline Drive Idcense Period - January 1, 1990 to December 31» 1992 II. BOAT DENSITY lir" m- The nunber of ln*~place boat slips# lifts and buoys shall not exceed the nusber shown on the attached plan# Exhibit B# and in accordance with Eesolotion 938# in no case shall the number of authorized boat slips# lifts# or buoys exceed the number permivted in the prior year's license. ■ ly t'- fjW Authorised Sumaer Density per attached plan: Bay Tanaqer Browns lli. mmy:mi^y .f ■ f ■J-y: ■y-.wy Transient Slips Q _ Rental Slips 40 Company Slips 0 _ Sub-Total: Slips at Dock 40 ^ Offshore Buoys 0 _ Maximum Boats in Water 40 ___ Dry stacked slip for use in lake Maximum Boats in water per prior license Other Boats (for sale/service# etc.) MAXIMUM BOAT DENSITY ON LAND AND/OR IN WATER 118 111 24TIT , r . ‘v'’ Exceeding this maximum boat density# or exceeding the number of permitted slips# lifts or buoys is a violation of this license subject to revoeation and/or prosecution for violation of Section 5.^2 Subdivision 2 of the Orono ■ ^ ■i. Municipal Code. Authorised Number of winter Stored Boats Sife: ^ ;pB' 1 ■; 'i ■> { - .i A lidlibit A License No.2394 Page 2ZXl. IV. V. S'-.'--; Ilf*' VI. i- mm- IF' ■ ■'T't'' :A j f ■' ^ll ■■ r-5 iA; ■ S DOCK LAYOUT (reference Exhibits B and C attached) Maximum authorized length of main doc)c 200 feet. Docks extending beyond 200 feet and doc)cs encroaching into required side yard setbacks are hereby specifically declared to be illegal non conforming structures which are not permitted under this license. The application does not contain such illegal structures. All such violations are subject to prosecution under Sections 5.42 and 10.41 of the Orono Municipal Code. Marina is not authorized for FUEL SALES subject to compliance with the State Fire Code. Required number of OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES No. 2674 (see variance noted below). per Resolution SPECIAL CONDITIONS required for compliance with the ordinances of the City and/or the LMCD. The issuance of this license is subject to full compliance with these conditions. Failure to comply with these conditions is cause for license revocation and/or prosecution by the City. 1. Dock length variance (LMCD 3t*din?.nce 3.02 Subdivision (2) (a) Brown Bay Docks. Required « 100* Existing " 200* Variance •> 100* 2. Side setback variance for dock structure on north property line on Browns Bay (LMCD Ordinance 3.02 Subdivision (2) (b) - Refer to Exhibit B. 50* - IOC* required ■ 30* existing - 20* variance ■ 10* 100* - 200* required existing » 20', variance 3. Side setback variance for dock structure on south property line on Tanager Lake (LMCD Ordinance 3.02 Subdivision (2) (b) - Refer to Bxhibit C. 0 - 50* - required 20*, existing •* O', variance 20' SO* - 100* - required 20', existing ■ 2* variance 18* 100* - 200* - required 20', existing - .8*, variance 19.2* 4. Side setback variance for deck structure on north property line on Tanager Lake (LMCD Ordinance 3.02 Subdivision (2) (b) - Refer to Exhibit C. 0 - 50* required « 60*, existing - 0*, variance » 60 50* - 100* required • 6C', existing - variance ■ 60* 100* - 20C required • 63', existing with 4* overhang, 3*, variance - 59.7* m}.. 1Exhibit AIiic«nt« No. 2394r«9« 30:^v.'■ sftiVr.^ -^m'5. Por Exhibit D attachodr off-street parking variance to Orono Zoning Code Section 10.41 Subdivision 5 per Resolution No. 2674: Required » 77 spaces Proposed « 73 spaces Variance - 4 spaces - v ■:_ = - 47 stalls to be provided on Tanager Lake side - 26 stalls to be provided on drovm's Bay side K ~£-A »*■ • 6. Variances to landscape requirements, structure setbacks, hardcover, and accessory structure separated from principal structure by a road way, per variance approval Resolution No. 2674. Ml 'WT Vll. Nothing in this license shall confer upon any person for the benefit of any property any vested right to use Lake Minnetonka or the premises in a sianner permitted by this resolution, but the use of Lake Minnetonka and the premises shall remain subject to such regulations and ordinances as the City and other competent regulatory authorities shall deesi necessary from time to time in the public interest. -f W;. mm V •;om. •V 0 ;‘ ^0 I»T-4(' ■, V I ■ e^Pi: Si B' s- •t SLIP lAViPiAT - 3i€ot«JMl &Af (7S suPy JZ i vT I # /^e^uA-Trc?^ AiO. " £2L /.|c/i4S€_ AJ a - 39V COUNTY 15" •• • •( 7« 1^ ^ c »u*a <C9 f^ar U#«C^«aA<. ▲MCr lN/^ra..LL«^ .W ^€>Nl ,:S.-'i. KfiS It; .jf? 1 'S i -a p . t &P ► .ii- > _J—u> D Q 5^ Oozi z U) \I^f 1 f • •oS*I So x^r W-* ijj.'i r*.,. iv-;,tJ<fil>iir c. ’f--^ uiP LhYo\XT -T^A^it. 4^Vtr-R€50L^*T70/^ A^O. ^ *70 r //d^rtscAie. ■;: 7 V, >i •••4 k J r"' ..: - »• • * • ."W m T3br a w i> TJW^-■r;jtr» yf^: •* / - "I ■ JLW g5 •s- r. I •>. 4 T. ‘^fX^ ;:§ J5 :* •fi •'T' 34J s - f-[Wm m <r 3f^ * T • if i <t-f^ ^ ■* -• -^?:>r-krSr^ .4 • .-i. ^ vm m I !•1-i'U %« ^^ • 4 r» ' •« t,* I V i ♦I i * ■ m ^ Bl (jMONO CityofORONO resolution OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2S74 --------------- A RBSOLOnOH G3lAliTIllG yj^pXASCBS TO s«^ ’*2SiSlMSH 10 (i) *«> ”SSoH S^mSIOR 10 (C> Fn^ #1424 MBBRSAS, Jamas ^-^Ys\he otntTl^t the^Vrope^rt:/ lharainaftar "tha n^iva within tha City of Orono *** V* 1 'inai^w* ------- ' »% ,-,r^ NBZBBAS, on “Soth Involving "“h. imgradln^tha^.conm^^ n^nwn'a Bay sidas of t^«_ «,-Qwn’s thm 35f*^ilV^a^ tlk-rirnrBr J ^^tcvam^nts^'cn ^ha*Brown's ."n*S Vr^vl..d =C^ ••y w..ii^4i^rT on the!»?“•: cjn.l‘r r'«v«l: vx:;E'Sbvta." «.. •■“•■=••■ f«r ---------------------- T1 ^ Exlatlng -76 atalla S^ad - 73 .tall. Varianea stalls or .05% - --------------- ♦ by public roadway - Tanagar iSS'i'h'iSiSn^ - ir'.1*. - =<> __ __ ^ * * 4 4 « 7 (A) 3 - vaxl«»c»« .ought to th« ruction 10.41. .djncont to roadway. Raqttirad - 50 (max purpo.a.) Fropoaad - 40* * Varianea •10* or 20% Paga 1 of 7 I.-'' i of ORONO resolution of the city council NO. _ ZlZi----------- , i, a T4 O .i « 10 41. subdivi.ion 9 O) * La^e.hore .etback foVVoU«rcial .trbcbure. * R«quir«<S • 75 -ixiatl^ - II. Propo**d “ V«rlanc« “ 46 or 39, vaxianca - - ^ f„, commarcial structure. Required aide yard _ setback for co {(•culrxi » xo : v’(acut.b aide yard - adiacent to co—rcra 2on«) variance - S’ or *0%v*ri*nc« - 3 < so - Pa’"’cover variance is section 10.41# Subdivision 10 required for nee construction. ’*"*’"7v’‘setblck Area - 9,OOP square feet Allowed - O' .—.re feat or 96.8%Esistin, - 8,720 s^ar. f^^^ - haiScover proposed at 6s376 s.f. or 70%) „.250’ setback Area - 9,700 square feet Allowed - ***,-„ feet or 100% toistiag - S’’®? *2^, f,.t or 90% (app 'ropo! 112fi.4<9J - -- -- - - - - -- - "rU'^Yon‘^”«'d-::v:r 2,f34 ■efe). __ _ _ _ _ _e.4 1 «f ; Oro&o, X, TBUroU. B. IT R«OiT«. b, the City Council of Niaaasotat r • «• ______^ -- ZoaiA9 #1424. This application was r.Tie« . . CCSSmm 2. property Stt«ia«sa Oi*txic« 3e aaaa Diatxaw^* the Otuno Plaaning <=f^”dtS UpcoTsi^of *tb"p^opoMd June Pl»— .j.,« #4fi^lnass usee w —— varianeas tba «olloaia%f fia^a^** Fags 2 cf 7 \ V.'. 9^- fa ..■ fa fl-i'"; ls| >i,'T-i- J'A"-," :- r®5fa' «:v %■ City of ORONO resolution of the city council NO.2674 ;NO f®'c- ..S't I • •,1-, f-r.•,.-■■ •».-■ ■ ^"fa. •'i'. • -7. V.' " ^fa ’S; A> The total hardcover removed as a result o taprwlaents -ill be 3,534 s.f. or 19%. these will result in a severely liaited property* - ea^VartlTe^ rrl^inVl-sUe-X^%VAo^ed ^JftS Application #1263JlkWW - — H^snt has prooosed better treatment of S«ia.V. •.nS'r^-off with" t.he amended proposal. E) The amended PF°P°**^g^H''than was required to be jiovVdtllh or"iVn.l land use application *1263. «. #e-vE hMM sustained a marina use for over 25 P) The property has suscaineu years 4. The City Council b« ^”^^^^^tions*’^o*f the ineloding th^t city staff# coonsents by the fjw ®T‘eV.'\"«'V:' V^h^ prVoVed'variance, on the health. S. The City Council J„*it'rnd'do "noVapply this property are f*<=^^“,oVinV district; that 9'“*^“® ^ n/i?.^%;^Turd^^o\^;.r»i/^ iifiSio;t;,"“pro'p-rtT» -ou^d^ \Vn”.?siiy ”7l!ev‘i.t. Ksy;; " Pa^e 3 of 7 --- 'fell V ■■ ■■.*^’i*'V, A * ffr! ¥^i} y- V 1^,I fe:,^0- •■ !; V li-.-'; & •-. r«, f?j: [; ■ ■'A : City of OROIVO ||[ () M (^ r4 besolution of the city council NO. ---------------- COBO.OSIOIIS. ORDER JWD COHDITIOHS B...d upon on. or Sbo^t referenced OrMO City Council hereby gr^«^|PPion construction of^^ .Vru^’"*,„V en^ine’d^eiorgran«ePP^^^^^ fSie^eiiV^crndi^to- Prior to issuing « hulling pernit^^r^r^^^ *'f*ted •'- issuing • diffloli^ic P completedi;rurtur% .nd/or is.ous^ be completed of ti»« existing struc^u^ws by ths spplicn*'^' , hv the City Engineer of fine! grading and ,) approval by the Ci parking area. ^rainsge plsns toz _____________I «• 1, submit a Developer's Agreement .Vb) Applicant »h«“ ‘"Written at 15oi of the tost of 'with s Letter of Credit onaure the completion of Sy e?!’?HVo"^ht “up^Sdeng“^^^^ m___ —oaJTcity «s « — aice 2 All green-space areas to be Pl*““d or r.,tor^ per _ Jian by Rutledge Co “'truct^n. J?:;'includes the 5 ‘ h“«‘; rion, the sooth 10 ^ boat Ki‘r.V-«•". “S1 ‘A =Sr.» »• •• .«n nn /S«5J, Rayment of two SAC^»nits^at^*U10^ ,_b. SSfs'^'etlSi of tSS’co-aercial structure. FTOC^lwn ^ — w- — #oat coauBsrciel structure muse 4. the 4.500 •'*“•/» 'Vtie sprinkler system per Sta prorlded with an automatic p Building Code# Appendix I.Building coaep «h*ll be ,. ."i> :ivAr,.v“”si,‘a‘-AiAvnyi'”.ss. OSAvii i§ta^ 1® p«rki-ng space during winter oo«t Fsge < of kL,.........:‘-v>t:• •ir^iiisLiA. kl& •'■ ■;>•:. • of ORONOresolution of the city council NO. _illi------------ ^ of Public Works has approved the 'of*"*’^*"" follow.n, eonditionst „ entr.ne. to ,b. defined by bltn»inoo. curbin,. from the edge stri. rrom d) Ab .B,in--.»r-s apolicati^* ”rco“ty.abottld ecccapeny the perait app a _^ ^ ♦» W fc]SnwidAM - -- , ,. Authorltie. 9«nted by tbi, raeoluti^n | piopirty not with the •PPl\=“‘lig" *„ a building P«™^^ muet be exercised “SSt# of Council •PPf‘’’*L' :iJfin«“ wiA'VxpVren: that date (August 14, 1990.. • _j>^w ...ee t-h* t ve**a*'^* *'** ^— __ j • Violation of or non-conpliance with any of ^*™*n of t^ndltitn. of this ;^%\\xTte^n^ any authority ^l.r.3^’er:itr.'nS‘tt.U be punishable .. a nisde-eenor. V* _ _ _a ...e<4«va«^OOd xo. the undersigned •PP^^^^j'Vesolttiorand'oVbthllf5r!SL:rfrtirhtrrs?-:::c...«^ the property. Page S cf •• •m 0 rt m-IP‘‘ Kl- CITY OP ORONO License Year P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Phone 473-7357 Date application sent to Marina /^ ^L Date application returned to City ________ AimOAL COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION - Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.42 Section 5.42, Subdivision 2 - Licensed Required^ It is unlawful for any person to engage or participate in the "business or docking, nooring, or storing boats or (operating) a cominercial boat dock business" without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. pLSkSB COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY JANUARY 15 OP THE LICENSE YEAR. BUSINESS INPORMATION 1. BUSINESS OR TRADE NAME Street Address l4^< Ia],' kl A/az 0^/1)^ Mailing Address /!X <— Marina Phone S _ _ _ _ Ja yAim Office Phone 2. PROPERTY INPORMATION Date Property Acquired ^7-^ Marina Controls Property byi ^ foe ownership lease from ether (explain) CITY OF am flHMCF OFF ICE 13113000CO -------7TZEM 436.00 CHECK Ti 436.00 TCCEyr-ihJCiK rW k:35C40 COOl Ml T12:i ----------- OZ'13.'^ List every occupant, propertyt other than this Marina, occupying this CITY am ■nttsfr OFFICE fa wa);.* ju-xw Page 1 of 5 < w. H • 00 * 4JO,00 rCU ^^01 .«v'i ?0^:- .‘a-rX' Jk/-iv.V ;'tt>«ttln, U>c..hor. property owners: , L . \, Mi- ___iJl------------------- (M aim Addr***) ^i£' I ^ — cs7^i IOiL^ ^ [M«a* ♦^ddress) •lM«t BKfiMIlXAtlW! (Check Jc^ corporation VidttAl o%m«r*hip - - P*,ido»l ownership - - officer and their title: ^ o* e.=^» p*«"« ---------- • irr-^ ---------------------------------------------------------- -Sau^ X "T'T^.ygfeS.I / _______________—------------------------------------------------- —------------------:r.r(8) resoonsible £or daily operation . U) eC the ««rin» »»nager(8) r . _ _ __ _ P - - --- - - - - -- - --- - -- on duty when the marina is openTi— nu-ber^Teisployees on duty ilninai nu®^. . _ 5*»son: { dttrin9 -----I repair o^ service personnel infonnation^ ere. U ««^ic«s o£f«r«d) : B0SX8ESS hCTIvm (check ^ ceatel (eoorege) - - sales teatel (sworege) tackle sales ■tosege (storage) ^ trailer sales Uenching (day-use rasg.) _2^ senoau »U y*“ :h«CK •Ffc'*''*'------ - open during hocci'!;? ^ .uyear ^ J dock acce.a ^ to ^ eed hour, of operation. PM r«tmll A*!** £ ••rvtc«^ AM to ^PM Ti»'.ibf,:fnqf« 2 of 5 "t"' m:--mrn^ •’ft* 1 yjts. plan lals I p -operty un sctbacic itun setback luiB setback ft. t allowed lide. lift, oats or tted with lil ill • • •>m- IX C9t»p^r t**^^*^*io«t» 14. |i.P f.- ■r<' Boats Dry-Stac)ced for Laka Usea) Insida Buildings b) OutsIda on Racks c) Outsida - other means Total Boats Dry-Staclced total watercraft Availability Units (Add 12 4 13) Othar Boats on Premises m\ Transient -oats (repeir/sarvice) h) Mew boats for sale (inventory) c) used boats for sale (inventory) Total 14. Winter Storage on Praisises a) Transient boatsb) Contract storage(customer s boats) c) Inventory (new a used boats) Total H.at.l »•.« »•«*•! SilP/S?*'* Total Mot. U% IS. Tn^ide Building Outside Storage ✓ Lx-(?, — Inside Building Outside Storage L 1 vV': ,r,, ,'U’ tV'y I; --‘1 ht«street parking requirements 17. Summer Parking a) Retail sales/service customers g apacas minimum (+1 per each b) Boating customersr.MC.. P« 10 Av.il.bility unit. (.6 X c) Launching ramp customers 10 spaces minimum per ramp 1,000 s.f.) -cars (line 14)) -cars cars Total Spaces II' 11. Winter Parking carg me AMD SITE IMPBOyi OMinances re<rare otabl^l-jnt^n^^^ is2.s^.^«d .? iS» ofmt d.pcb, »»* i... iL; i# f" ind bot •>» tl-n 75 ft. fwart X P«ee 4 of S fftir;S. %. . ”5- E'i W ' ;:; 8i& r fi- S' P-mm i h- rt-;. I- ai.s» r^i- >s*- IfF’:": m ^ ?a:. lK, a- ‘-a-;-' SS. .-- •-V, . '.'”;' : s: ‘,- r:-:%. - 8w?r:8 pa.:, iM: W-m ■a a ska;IPs. k|| '. . ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application: 1.A CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY (Per LMCD requirements) indicating the boundaries of the marina property and the authorized dock use area# the location of al '. structures# storage areas, docks, slips, buoys, launching ramps, gas pumps and tanks, parking areas, access areas, fencing and landscaoing features. The drawing shall be updated each year to show all existing facilities, all changes from the previous season, and any changes proposed for the duration of the current application. 2.A DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLAN for all setback areas showing existing and proposed location and sizes of all trees, sl^rubbery, grass areas and other foliage or landscaping features. 3. A copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPLICATION. 4.A COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION FEE according to the current City fee schedule. V* :> Initial Application § $300.00 _ Renewal Application ? $200.00 ^ Each Boat Unit (Line 12) ^ $2.00/ea Each Boat Unit (Line 13) ? $1.00/ea _ _ _ TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION ^. i 5.LATE FEES - Renewals - Applications for renewal of licenses shall be made no later than January 15 of the new license year. The City shall not accept renewal 1 applicatToiis received after January 15 un 1 e s a the appflcatiwi is accompanTed by a late Fee of »50^^. REVXBIf PROCEDURE When a empiete application is received, this Information will be referred to the Marina Committee for review. The City Council will review the Marina Committee recommendation and will thereafter pass upon the application. TEE MARINA MAY OPEN FOR PUBLIC USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITf C00NClU7 Pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Marina License application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and the City's designated employees or agents to enter upon the marina property at any reasonable time to perform safety andinspections.code ec 3 ’v ■ tR'f ■ Vf ■''Mr —-.f . ... Date^ 1 CITY of OBONO LICENSE YEAR 0«t« •pplieaciM ••nt to tiorin« PiMt OfRc* Bo« 66*Cry«ul B«y. Minnesota 5532.1 T«l«phon« 473-7357 Sato Application to City foo IIOCAi vod I _________ ■/ IVNWUAL COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.42 lO.V' Vr Sac. 5.42 Subd. 2 License Required It is unlawful for any person to anaAQA <>*“ participate in the "ousiness o£ duckxnu, mooting, or storing boats or (operating) a commercial boat dock business" without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY Cr IRK BY MARCH 1 OF THE LICENSE YEAR. CITY CF OR mr^coPT-vm m 70520 COO, « BUSINESS INFORMATION 1.BUSINESS OR TRADE NAME Street Address i 4rA^^ > K5 Ui£t r2,u M A r' . '*‘v ^ 'C m Mailing Address w 2lA,TAi Marina Phone ^77 f L4^'Office Phone PROPERTY INFORMATION Date Property Acquired /^7V Marina Controls Property by:X fee ownership lease from ' ■ 'MM ■»V- cther (explain) List every occupant, other than this Marina, occupying this property: m'. ■' PAGE I OF 5 it. M r^e 3 • ’P-W": Si-S' »«#; K i: m s% i 4. ti;;W -5 jvi^, i SipPiW:II# psg> I,;-• ,• lit-- vs ifo. aM %- m ^".- isr- 5. 1^1% iS >4,;. 4. S'V.- 'M Sirfm.'- It «: i._. ^.r »i mw SiV-i tet' "Vii?= Pr-‘"...-...v-V S' ^4- Names of abutting lakeshora proper::/ owners;4 ' ’ (North/West) • •<y r I /*-MS. (Name Address) (South/E«st) h<r<<v'/V-,^/ (Name + Address! Other Property Owners that may be affected by Marina's o-eration: (Name Address) (Attach sheet if necessary) BUSINESS ORGANIZATION: (Check applicable item) _ _ individual ownership _ _ partnership _>1_ corporation List the name of each partner or corporate officer and their title; ... ^ A. X, List name(s) of the marina manager(s) responsible for daily operation. V -7 . List the minimum number of employees on duty when the marina is open to the public during the boating season: / doc)c attendants /reoair or service personnel Others available for sales/public information, etc. principal business activity (check services offered): X ,Up r.ntal (mootag.) ^ “"-I service buoy rental (moorage) - - tales bait and tackle sales \ trailer sales dry storage (moorage) boat launching (day-use ramp) i. BUSINESS SCHEDULE {check appropriate items): open during boating season only - - '1^4' ^List proposed hours of operation: dock access AN to A open all year /PM retail sales il service AM to Page 2 of 5 it* 7. •KARINA SECURITY is provided by:Ofl <r c y dock information NOTE: fe.- M The LMCD defined DOCK USE AREA must be shown on the dock plan submitted with this application. Maxi.mum dock length equals 200 ft. from 929.4 shoreline. Minimum side setbacks from property line extension are: o-50 ft. from shore ■ 10 ft. minimum setback 50-100 ft. from shore « 15 ft. minimum setback 100-200 ft. from shore * 20 ft. minimum setback SHORELINE WIDTH: feet. WATER '“EPTH: at shore at 100 out 5 ft. f fc 4. •out I •-< ► . ^ X. • » ACTUAL MAXIMUM DOCK LENGTH from shoreline: at 200 ft. out fS ft, ft. / ipp- ' ■■ 1i' ■mmur DOCK CONSTRUCTIHN (permanent, seasonal, etc.) _ _ _ permanent piling with seasonal decking permanent piling and decking _ _ _ wooden piling _ _ _ metal or concrete piling __ _ wooden decking _ _ _ metal decking marina / I* *\ ! t / > / canopies are installed by:customer y'not allowed BLIPS AND BOAT UNITS the maximum number of boats in eac.' category. Each slip, slide lift, •coring or other space actually used for storage or keeping of boats or •Ctercraft must be indicated and numbered on the dock plan submitted with this application. m *smr tervie# •Date ■Mtal iMtc mmmtMi il«|i/f|Ns«e tctel it • Scats Stored in the water I'J iK. a) At dock slips b) At docks, other than slips e) At slides d) At lifts •) At moorings f) Other boats in water fit nS 'Ip- I, ?-' Total boats in water 4l0h. ■ . Fs<j« ) of 5 .1 >■ 1fy\ : V • ^ m If-' i% Boats Dry-Stacked for Lc>a Use —a*ntJ. i..p/^^t':< :3*. •• •■jati• »a) Inside Buildings b) Outside on Racks c) Outside - other means Total Boats Dry-Stacked r. » Total Watercraft Availability Units (Add 12 13) II 0 I. I:?' A- «: 4 1^4!' :4T- . &■>i*,,. i# p- !ife s^:-- kW= r::'v Other Boats on p-emises a) Transient Boats (repair/service) b) New boats for sale (inventory) c) Used boats for sale (inventory) Inside Building Outside Storage 1 Total 16. Winter Storage on Premises a) Transient boats (repair/service) b) Contract storage(customer’s boats) c) Inventory (new a used boats) Total *3 i 1/ Inside 8uilding Outside Storage 11. " r OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS 17. Summer Parking a) Retail sales/service customers 8 spaces minimum (‘►1 per each 900s. f over i , 000 s-f.)cars b) Boating customers 6 spaces per 10 Availability Units ^.6 X (line 14))cars c) Laur.thing ramp customers 10 spaces minimum per ramp cars Total Spaces 18. Winter Parking Minimum 2 spaces, or retail spaces per line 16a above cars LAMDSCAPING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS Ordinances require establishment and maintenance of minimum greun areas and natural screen .ng along all Marina property lines: 10 ft. front yard, iO ft. side yard and a lakeshore yard of 10% of the lot depth, not less than 10 ft. and not more than 75 ft. If. Describe in detail the plantings (trees, shrubs, grass, vines, flowers, ate.) and other improvements proposed to be installed this coming license year I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _—- - - - - --i- - - - -——- -7 ——-j' ieiiie*e*e>ee*eiee^ ^ / t .goMMa*' -S' -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -^ ■iiwaaa iviii 1 1 1 r.^-ea/ T ima-eiA __.jh. i*’ 4.: !T:‘f>r <■: mfe: ATTACH4MENTSTh« following must accompany this application: 1.A CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY (per L*MCD requirements) indicating the boundaries of the marina property and the authorized dock use area, the location of all structures, storage areas, docks, slips, buoys, launching ramps, gas pumps and tanks, parking areas, access areas, fencing and landscaping features. The drawing shall be updated each year to show all existing facilities, all changes from the previous season, and any changes proposed for the duration of the current application. 2.A DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLAN for all setback areas s.howing existing and proposed location and sizes of all trees, shrubbery, grass areas and other foliage or landscaping features. 3. 4. A copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPLICATION. A COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION FEE according to the current City fee schedule. Initial Application § $300.00 Renewal Application 9 $200.00 Each Boat Unit (Line 12 ) ? $2.00 each Each Boat Unit (Line 13 ) ? $1.00 each *7/^ TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION S. LATE FEES - Renewals - Applications for renewal of licenses shall be nade no later than February 1st of the new license year. The Cit^ •Aall not accent renewal license applications received after ~ March 1st unless the application is accompanied by a late fee of|50.00. REVIEW PROCEDURE Whan a coa^lete application is received, this information will be rafarred to the Marina Committee for review. The City Council will raviaw the Marina Committee recommendation and will thereafter pass upon the application. itaetllA MAY OPEM POR PUBLIC USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE—mmt,---------------xmidmiStsm Purauant to Saction 5.42 of the Oroi.o Municipal Code, the applicant iMuraliy requasts the Orono City Council to review this Marina License ^ application, an4 agrees and authoj izes the City of Orono and the Cjty s (daai^Riatad aaplo yae s or agents to enter upon the tsarina property at wny Puaaonable tiaa'^tS perform safety \nd code compliance inspections. ^ -.A/V Date Page 5 of X2. ..uSili..-- "■MiMW'-''[■■•r '■'' S'^'|v:k. ’V‘. ‘> 4;, -3 PM/’’ 4- r'i ?,■;-> . te'Jv*'; w ,.3'. ■ &■'(■. iP'- 'f'':i';,]jyii‘'..' r, iiff' fe:: mW IV; 41"" lifcv. * A »« «i ^ m*«» *• 4»»< i •«« «» * . *m*§ IStt I 1355 5 fUtTLIDOa CONSTRUCTION ^ * ♦ 4t# » » ♦ ♦ "4 ^ «'•#’«« t-AV A4M'A ««•« 4»..waa»^., iMPSsrai liniiOiMiifH^^Afiimi 4 •• ' ' * »♦ • f * f ♦ ■i i 1 i • 4I •* ' vi r.-U^:'-; X ■:;vx;;.^t, ■ ■ ■ • ^v.'S- ■ fc--■: |i:& c^r- •;%‘^ | - lx. :•■*■'*’"" MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 27, 1992 ZONING FILE #1700 - CONT. \i 7;.r:n i°..Vo-roViiz ihV cr<.?t.in°^;.r no* :ss,t7o;‘.T'h^;covr*«rrrb: approved. Ay«t 5, nays 0. C»P4) 91725 DAVIS FANSLER, 4100 BAY8I0E ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3112 It was movad by Butler, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution •3112 for Application §1725 for Davis Fansler of 4180 Bayside Road for a conditional use permit to allow a non-rental guest apartment within the existing residence. Ayes 5, nays 0. (•5) MARINA LICENSES Callahan stated that It has been determined by the Lake Use Coasalttee that there are four marinas within the ^‘^7 **j[ conformance with the requiremorts for a license: Minnetonka Works, Sailors world, Crystal Bay Service and Windward Marina. He noted that Windward Marina has not paid the required application fee for 1991. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by following marina license: Butler, to approve the Minnetonka Boat Works (1990-91-92) Sailors World (1990-91-92) Crystal Bay Service (1991-92) and that a letter be sent to those marinas stating the City has reviewed their marina license application and they have to be In conformance for getting the license JJJ* conditions within Attachment A. with the agreement bualness be operated within the existing requirements of the city. Ayee 5, nays 0. Callahan stated he was opposed to the adoption of the noting that some of the language in the resolution was no longer valid. Butler noted that other City licenses are Issued with a single paper notifying the business that their license has been aoprovsd. 8 *1ifc'■m,:.flrii' •> .5 6^; a ■'• siiiv. !*#■ !M&' ‘ m4-^- ^V'.. 'r^ v<^. ». ■< ’ .- •.. . r . aw* 4.V- -*- L -^,'v - ri- • rr.'^-- ■' • \ ■-'■ :*•» ■^iii Tot Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator % Wromt Dat«i Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Adm July 9, 1992 SubjectI List of Exhibits A - 6/18/92 Memo/Minnetrista Flexibility Request •0>>_V %yMinnetrista Shoreland Ordinance/Flexibility Request ^5 % Cities around Lake Minnetonka have begun to submit their proposed Shoreland Ordinances and Flexibility Requests to the DNR for review. You may recall that Orono submitted our Ordinance and Flexibility Request in February, received no negative responses from other cities, and DNR staff have verbally indicated they will accept our zero-setback for lockboxes based on the justification we submitted. I was advised 2 weeks ago that there may be some additional housekeeping items, but in general they are accepting our code as presented. As the other cities submit their proposed ordinances, most will likely be requesting some form of flexibility. The procedure is that they send their Flexibility Request to both the OMR and all other Lake Minnetonka cities. We then have 45 days to respond to the proposing city and/or DNR. DNR and the proposing city then have 15 days to address any concerns raised oy us. (If we make no response within that time frame, the DNR will assume the proposed flexibility raquest is not objectionable). tfe are in receipt of Minnetrista's proposed Shoreland Ordinance. The attached memo indicates the few areas in which they request flexibility. Please review Minnetrista's request. If you agree that their Flexibility Request is reasonable and acceptable, no response is required. You do have the option of taking a formal vote indicating no objection to their ordinance or any others that we see in the coming months, although that may serve no Qg4fful purpose. If, on the other hand. Council finds Flexibility Requests by other cities that Council feels should not be granted by DM, then a fonral response would be appropriate. This «K>uld most appropriately be in the form of a letter to the specific city and the DNR. Staff tion Per the June 18 memo attached, staff recommends no objection to the Minnetrista Shoreland Ordinance. If Counci 1 agrees, no formal action is required. lev I nr Ilf ii-f EC’ s ¥■ !,- h. ■ r. Kh C; 1$. % iSkVr fteF- jfajfe;),. (».'■ TOj PROM I DATE: SUBJECTS Ron Moorse# City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning t Zoning Administrator June 18, 1992 Review of Minnetrista Shoreland Ordinance 1 have reviewed the information submitted by Minnetrista and would make the following comments: 1. b. They are requesting flexibility in three specific areas: a. Height of structures, requesting 35’ versus DNR's 25'. Deck setback requirements. It is indicated that Minnetrista allows a 6' wide deck as a non-encroachment when it extends into the 0-75* lakeshore yard from a house located at the 75* setback. Since the DNR would allow such a deck to be 15% of the required setback area or ll-*- feet, I don't know why they feel this needs flexibility from the DNR requirements. 25%/35% impervious surface (hardcover) in R-2 Douglas Beach District. Minnetrista uses the entire lot area as their hardcover basis. In the Douglas Beach District, they allowed 25% of the lot to be covered by above—grade structures, with an additional 1-J% coverage by at-grade impervious surfaces like pools, patios, etc. This was done to reduce the number of variance recjests. Minnetrista justifies this by controlling open space in the neighborhood and being more restrictive than DNR standards in over 95% of their shoreland areas. c. Z don't have any problems with their flexibility requests. While I have not reviewed their existing ordinances, I an generally of the Improssion that Minnetrista*s ordinances are fairly similar philosophically to Orono's. I am more concerned about some of the othar more densely developed cities such as Wayzata, Excelsior, and ipring Park. !:p .r r •;-f V f-'t. ' \ Ip k'-ty-*-*_ - •.I’. %/V city cf ^4innetrista j#a. iffi: Sf;A. ■t|',M:l Ir-'- &’■ W' ■r: ■ ■^y <L-ta ^35.. i I'l ■* ■ !v ’' ,' ’■ rV, Wm: Mh- kk. ,y:p J June 10, 1992 JtIN 1 i ^QQ2 Mr. Ron Moorsc Oiy of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Moorsc: Pursuant to the Shorcland Grant Agreement between the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) and the City of Minnetrista, I am pleased to submit the * • „ T . . ' . ________I_____ r-r»mmi»nr rnnics o:nanirai Resources ......................r ; ^ ^mlimuiarr ihoreland ordinance amendment for your review and comment. Copies ot the proposed amendment have also been forwarded to the MnDNR and the surrounding Lake Minnetonka Communities. Let me begin by outlining the manner in which the City Code for Minnetrisia is organized. In 1987, the city codified all previously adopted ordinances into a single book. The "code" as it is referred to, has many facets and shorelands or water uses arc covered in at least five chapters, including the following: Chapter 6. Chapter 18. Chapter 21. Ch^’ter 22. Chapter 23. Boats Docks and Waterways Planning and Development Subdivisions Water, Sewers and Sewage Disposal Zoning As liich. staff determined that it would be inappropriate to relocate all refcrcriccs to sboreland or water in a new chapter. The significant factor is the excessive rc-pnnting cocts associated with providing five or six new chapters to more than 20 code book holders. Mifinetrista bfg?" its rcvww of the updated MnDNR shorcland standards more than 12 months ago You should know that much of the MnDNR Standards arc currently part of the decode in one form or another and that Minnetrista is more restrictive than the MnDNR smndards in many situations. FlexUlity Request: Ihe City requests flexibility from the following provisions fCfalatioM: mu County Road 110 WaM • Mirwatriata ■ Minnaaota 55364-95S2 Oiy Oflteaa iia.4aa.iaaa • in aia.4ia.i3i i J ¥ &■ P-¥. vi-. :i I :r^vr r If' f ^ ii'%. fc-ft ' .t. P.; fe- R '■, I®«-a!%v' *•' Page 2 Height of Structures The MnDNR regulations prohibit structure heights greater than 25 feet The current city ^lows 35 feet or three stories in all districts except R*2 DB district, where the height restriction is 25 feet The City and MnDNR utilize essentially the same definition for determining the actual height of the structure. Qansktering the style and size of the residences located within the shore'and district, staff believes that the proposed height limit will create a hardship to ripariari lot owners. Staff suggests that as a trade-off, we continue to maintain the 20 percent limit on impervious surface in most districts versus the 25 percent limit placed by the MnDNR standards. Deck Setback Requirements “he Oty currently allows the construction of a deck to a point six feet into the required setback. This provision was established to address the situation where a home is constructed at the 75 foot lake shore yard setback. As is the case in most instance^ a sliding glass door is installed on the second story. The owner would be allowed, without variance, to construct a six foot deck into the setback area. The MnDNR allows the addition of a deck to a point not exceeding 15 percent of the required sedmek area (onto an existing structures only). In the case where the setback is 75 feet, the deck addition could be 11.25 feet. Staff believes that the City requirement would be more restrictive than the MnDNR standards. 25% or 35% Impervious Surface in R-2 Douglas Reach District The Douglas Beach neighborhood within the City of Minnetrisia is a unique area to Minaetrista, although it is comparable to many neighborhoods in Mound, Orono, Spri Park any other community with older platted developments. Dou^as Beach is a tmt|i aectloa pUlced in the early 1900s with 40 to 60 foot lots. Many of the exisring ynr*round homes are merely converted cabins. In 1982, the City established a new tiffing dassificatlon for Um district (R*«. DB). ^^hin dlls zoning classifkation, the city established new setback regulations, height ffttricrions and impervious surface requirements. In the latter, the Gty amended the coda to aflow up to 25 percent coverage of the lot by structures occupying space above tha pada lavel (including decks, houses or garages). The dty also allowed up to an ypurffiifi 10 percent coverage hy other forms of impervious surface like swimming poo and tt-grade patkit. This provision has signi&antly reduced the number of variance ra^icsts from this neighbortmod. 'f.- i i JFWf". pi *%■' '. “ Sa ;m$- 1- RI. ■Ji:i B: iis w t, F’F |F- ip;i.if.P->F :' F- -i':rC.fc "fF‘ --i- ■ . ••'' '-* -i*/' ' AiKi i ■'■ F^'-im y.' ■'i#‘ ’■;":}v ■F ,•-■■- 'Fi. F... ■ii> ■ ■sp;^ P IKi; Wm:!;f-: ^l|j,:|t% 'lit'r*tp ;®' ■fe' ■M-F m4»-R|. illi Page 3 The MnDNR standard would allow up to 25 percent coverage by impervious surface. The city recognizes the need to reduce excessive run-off caused by impervious surface, in addition to preventing over-crowding of residential structures within a neighborhood. In an effort to address these issues, the city has taken ownership of tax forfeit property and has control over 12 lots within this neighborhood. While we have not been able to calculate the total impervious surface within the district, efforts are being taken to balifff*^ reasonable development and property owner's rights and the public need to control excessive and damaging run-off. Also, from a city-wide perspective, Minnctrista is more restrictive than the MnDNR in over 95 percent of its shoreland areas. PUD Standards: Although the City believes that its current Planned Unit Development Standards are substantially compliant with the purpose of the MnDNR regulations, the city submits the following summary for your review. The City ordinance limits residential density increases to areas served by municipal services, such as sanitary sewer and water systems. In these areas, the increase would be generally limited to no more than a 10 percent increase. The MnDNR standard would allow a significant multiplier effect by establishing tiers and density increase allowances based on the setbacks from protected waters. The density multiplier begins at 50 percent and increases to 200 percent. The Minnetrista code exempts all lands below the ordinary high water elevation in determining the total developable land area for a PUD project The MnDNR standards exempt all wetlands, steep slopes and area below the ordinary high water elevation to determine the total developable area of the project. Staff believes that the trade off between the 50 to 200 percent increase allowed by the proposed standards is more than off set by the significantly lower City density increase allowances. Additionally, the city regulitiona. The efty enacted iKtditional regulations protecting woodlands throughout the city with Urn ladiTfllfHi of the woodland preservation standards. This new development policy is critical to the protection of the many urban woodland areas surrounding public waters. mmm. ittii.4 'mm■ \ 1^ m:-‘ K fe'^' ’^'y. w ll M li"*- Page 4 Here*i bow it works: In areas designated by the Comprehensive Plan, the development density was reduced by 50 peiceot in areas determined to have significant woodland. Developers are given the tmortuniiy to increase the dcvelt^mcnt density by that same amount (back to the orighial development density) if they follow strict development polknes within the ordinance. MinnetrisU is the smallest city in the twin cities to adopt such strict development standards. In closing. I hope that this summaiy is helpful to you during your review of the Minnetrista Shoreland Regulations and proposed ordinance amendment I am available fof questions you might have regarding this process or an interpretation of any portion of the proposed amendment. i ■y. Sincere Jay Blake, AICP CbyPlaaaer -i Attachment 1 '■si '-'y p»’- f •'•’■vi- ;-j'' -V I'’' iK't h m ,.C i' CITY OF MIKliETRISTA COmiTY OF HEJfNEPIN STATE OF MimiESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 6, 18, AND 23 OF CITY CODE RELATING TO THE MANAGEMENT OF SHORELAND DISTRICTS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MINNETRISTA HEREBY ORDAINS THAT. Section f-37. Public Waters Access Lots. Lots iateaded as coatrolled accesses to public ** . reoreatioa areas for use by owners of non-riparian lots within subdivisions are permissible and must meet or exceed the following standardss (a) Public water access lots must meet the width and size raouirements for residential lots within the zoning district in vhiob it lieSf and be suitable for the intended uses of controlled access lots. (b) Tbs number of allowed slips allowed on a multiple dock shall be determined by standards established in Article 2 of Chapter • of the Minnetrista Municipal code. (cl The public waters access lots must be jointly owned by hll purchasers of lots in the subdivision or by all purchasers of Bcn-riparian lots in the subdivision who are provided riparian mccess rights on the access lot; and t»r««r.pby .. .ueh .. pr.ctle.l fro. Ti.* fro. tb. public water# assuming summer, leaf-on conditions. Section 18-96. Permit. by grading of existing land so as to elevate or alter the Aicisting grade; or to build, alter, or repair any seawall, retaining wall, to rip-rap or otherwise change of lake shore property, unless exempted by subsection (b), an without a permit issued by the city council. DRAFT pr"ir' I r i I i I•I-r ,v ‘ I ■ 'I .f.-'i/'- 1^- I?- Iv'^ S> ■■f"n -1^s|k Pag* 2 Ordinance No (b) Exceptions intended to govern The requirements of subsection (a) are not adjoining property of oubooetion (of. Further ere aotiviteieo end niaintcnanoe-7—eo well- furtheranee of egrioulturei the fellovingx (li Tbe fill or excavation cf less than ten (10) cubic ' yards of naterial within a shoreland district on or ovor steep slopes» or within shore or bluff impact sones sloping towards protected waters. over steep slopes, or within shore and bluff impact •ones sloping towards protected waters. (3) The fill or excavation of less than thirty (30) cubic yards of material on any property outside of a shoreland district. (4) normal and customary grading in the comstructed building, or the grading J_ servlmg such building, such grading “f ?n^tlme■hell be aoDroved by the building inspector at the time th. buildln, p.r>lt. pro.idl., tMt . plaa shoving property drainage and protection of adjoining property has been submitted. (5) normal and customary landscaping in ^I# existing dvelling which does not emisti^ drainage or low-lying land on the property owner or adjoiniri property owners (•) hotivities associated with public road construction and maintenance. DRAFT ■±‘ T’TrrTT. ■TwM-'I?'' w r|r i' fc: w Pag« 3 Ordinance No. (7) (i) Activltiea associated vith the furtherance of agricultural operation?^. Plaeeaent of natural rock rip-rap, including associate! grading of the shoreline and placement of a filter blanket, is permitted if the finished slope does not •Jieeed three feet horizontal to one foot vertical, the landward extent of the rip-rap is within ten feet of the ordinary high water level, and the height of the rip-rap does not exceed four feet. The building inspector shall be notified of any unusual earth filling or removal or grading and such activity shall be referred by the building inspector to the planning comnission for action in accordance with this section. (e) Review criteria. Grading or filling in any type 2, 4. S. 4, 7, or • wetland must be evaluated to determine how extensively the proposed activity would affect the following funetional gualities of the wetland*: 3, U)sediment and pollutant trapping and retention; (2)n^orage of surface runoff to prevent or damage; reduce flood (3)Pish and wildlife habitat; (4)Reereatienal use; (») Shoreline or bank stabilization; and (i)Voteworthiaess, including special qualities hiatorie significance, critical habitat for plants and animals, or others. such as endangered wiMt DRAFT 7''" ■ Vy •\y 2:K:rm ,U;-> #• 1:‘. V f r .• K’' :.; ' |- : IK '^1. '''t Pa^e 4 Ordinance No. •action Xt*97.Shoreland Alterations. •boraland alterations shall conply with standards established in •aetion 23-158. Section 21-1 Definitions. ••Bluff” aeans a topographic feature such as a bill/ cliff, or eubaakJieat having the following characteristics (an area with an average slope of less than is percent over a distant ' for so feet or Bore ehall not be considered part of the bluff): (a) Part or all of the feature is located in a shoreland area; (b)The slope rises at least 25 feet above the ordinary high water level of the waterbody; (c)The grade of the slo;:e from the toe of the bluff to a point 25 feet or acre above the ordinary high water Isvel averages 30 percent or greater; and (d) The slope Bust drain toward the waterbody wBlttff lapaet tone” hhu top of a bluff. Beans a bluff and located within 20 feet from vCMMuissioner” aeans the coaaissioner of the Department of Batumi Eesourees. •tpublie waters** aeans any waters as defined in Kinnesota •tattttes# seetion IOS.37, subdivisions 14 and is.^ii **lHtrs iapaet sons** aeans land located between the ordinary high water level of a public water and a line parallel to it at a Bethiirtr of so pereent of the structure setback. ••Bee of the bluff” aeans the lower point of a 50-foot segment with an average slope erceeding IS percent. ••Top of the bluff” aeans the higher point of a io-foot segneat with an average slope exceeding ii percent. DRAFT rfii liAnin III I m If m-;- ' L ' H. . - ’U^i- 'te.■'■'p •m- iMm,. \ f. . *:•ti- . : V Pag* 5 Ordinanca No. m :4i::-?¥: ■t Saction 23-149.Notification Procedures. (b) A copy of all anendiaents to this division and final pSviS5ili:;oi"2p;?ov:r:!tSIn~Se'shoreLnrL be bo tha coauaissionar of natural resources within ten (10) days of tha aaandnant or final action. Shoreland classification. Tributary Streams • # Legal Description six Mila Craek T117, R24,Secs 27, 28, 29,32, 33, 34 Daar Craak T117, R24,Secs 4, 5, 8, 9,16 Pionaar Craak T117, R24,Secs 5, 6 Paintar Craek T117, R24,Secs 1, 11, 12 Saction 23-153.Lot Area, width,setbacks, coverage, etc. (1) Unsewared Areas Natural Recreational General Environmental Development Development Waters Waters Waters Top of bluff 30 30 30 (2) Sevarad Araas Natural Recreational General Environmental Development Development Waters Waters Waters ¥oD of bluff 30 30 30 Saetion 23-155. Roads, par)cing areas, storavatar aaaagaaa&t and iaparvious surfaces. XjnarTlous surface coverage of lots must sot escead 20 pareast of tha lot area, except vitbia tha R-a (Douglas ■aaeh) soaiag district. (4) DRAFT %'M ■ ( S^. ‘ •'-5 -fe'' fe:- If.. ‘..,- 4' % k0- S' r. B-: 5t‘ ‘li' i ' V*1*1 {;■ u-:S' .^: Xm: g m ; K» ‘‘i f: 0^R#' si-'te" ^li- ■1^: ^r n. <1‘ piSIII' : KiS -^<;. ■ t >¥»■? Pag* 6 Ordinance No. (S)Wben constructed facilities are used for stormwater management, documentation must be provided by a Qualified individual that they are designed and installed consistent with the field office technical guide of the local soil and water conservation districts. (ft)Newly constructed stormwater outfalls to public waters must provide for filtering or settling of suspended •ollds und s)ili&aiB9 of surfaco debris before discharge. C7)Public and private watercraft access ramps# approach roads, and access-related parking areas nay be placed within shore impact sones provided the vegetative screening and erosion control conditions of this subpart are met. Section 23-1S8.Shoreland Alterations. (a) The removal of natural vegetation shall be restricted to pravant aroalon into protected waters, to consume nutrients of the soil, and to preserve shoreland aesthetics, and to protect SS?e“2d''dl2irfct ‘‘iSin"be subject ?o ?Se'"foiiowinrproviiLns? (4)The provisions of this section shall not apply to permitted uses which normally require the removal of natural vegetation, including alteration necessary for the construction of structures and sewage treatoent nmd the construction of roads and parking areas regulated by section 23-155. (S)Nemoval or alteration of vegetation, except for agricultural- uses a* regulated in Section 23-lil is allowed subject to the following standards: (a)In shore and bluff impact tones and on steep dwelling sit* and to accoaimodat* the placement of stairways and landings, picnic areas, access paths, livestock watering areas, beach and watercraft access areas, and permittad .... . vi^ter-orieated accessory structures or *...«ixltiea, provided that: DRAFT m ivv ' i«. Page 7 Ordinance No (b)The ecreening of struc ures, vehicles, or other facilities as viewed t.on the water, assuning suBUser, leaf“on conditions, is not suhstantxally reduced; (c)Along rivers, existing shading of water surfaces is preserved; and (d)The above provisions are not applicable to the removal of trees, limbs, or branches that are dead, diseased, or pose safety hazards. Section 23-160. Bluff Impact Zones (n) structures and accessory facilities, except stairways and laadings, must not be placed within bluff impact zones. (b) Stairways, Lifts, and Landings. Stairways and lifts the preferred alternative to major topographic alterations for achieving access up and down bluffs and steep slopes to shore . Stairways and lifts must meet the following design requirements: (1)Stairways and lifts must not exceed four feet in width on residential lots, wider stairways nay be used for commercial properties, public open-space recreational properties, and planned unit developments; (2) Landings for stairways and lifts on residential lots must not exceed 32 square feet in -—*• (3)Canopies or roofs are not allowed on stairways, lifts, or landings; (4)Stairways, lifts, and landings may be either eonstructed above the ground on posts or pilings, or placed into the ground, provided they are designed ud built in a manner that ensures control of soil erosion; (9)Stairways, lifts, and landings must be located in the Bost visually inconspicuous portions of lots, as viewed from the surface of the public water assuming summer, loaf-on conditions, whenever practical; and C6)facilities such as ramps, lifts, or mobility paths for physically handicapped persons are J®** access to shore eressp provided that the dimensional and performance standards of stibiterns (1) to (f) are met. DRAFT - v >: ' V'f ■ fS-fel' Si?, . ' • . Pag* 8 Ordinance No laetioB 23-l«l» Agriculture Use standards. Oanaral cultivation faming, grasing, nurseries, horticulture, hzuck faming, sod faming, and wild crop harvesting are •emitted uses if nteep slopes and shore and bluff impact sones em maintained in pemanent vegetation or operated under an eppreved ceneervation plan (Resource Nmagement System) MBsistent with the field office technical guides of the ^oe^l Sii^2tim*Lm“2rM^pro^idS^bJ*a''5uSifi2d^iSdpid^^KJa»s; sSi's rn:i%:;2.K «'S5...... from the ordinary high vater level. This Ordinance shall be published in THE LAKER and shall become effective Immediately upon publication. This Ordinance No. 1893 by a vote of_ was adopted on this day of, Ayes and Nays. Mayor Wally Clevenger ATTEST Charlotte Erickson Adminiatrator/Clerk (SEAL) iiljl' f# rf f DRAFT ' - .^j* >■ -I ‘' '} * i M .V- rS*' cl;* " ,K'l: •!? ’ ij ; ■^* ■*• W-.'^ m ■.:;;1f..- j ul j; '•‘:y/*‘- ■; . ^•- m .'.vL*?-' V- - , ■t.; ^ .lar •!. '.i ■' i-'. •• ':ft'r’% ^tSr-:':fcli'» /oT<Ot Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse# City Administrator - Dat«t Subject X Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Jfi^ii(^^^atdf^'K June 23, 1992 Met Council Rural Area Policy - Data Compilation % pjfior to the June 22 work session, I reviewed the existing densities in our 2 acre and 5 acre zones. This "survey" consisted merely of calculating the area within each section that is outside the MUSA line and exclusive of lakes and existing Biohvsy 12 right-of way (per the guidelines contained in the Met Council Policy Statement). Then, using our plat maps and iil« information, the number of existing residential units in each section was determined. Prom this information, the existing rural density for each section was calculated. That information is summarized as follows! 1.NuBiber of sections exceeding Met Council's upper limit of 1.0 units/10 acres: 15 of 21 2. 3. Average Density: 1114 units/7382 ac - 1.51 units/lO acres 10 ac Range in densities (units per 10 acres) on a section-by -section basis: 0.38 (Sec. 29) 3.23 (Sec. 11) (1.0 is Met Council's upper limit) 4.Expected density at "build-out" (Yr 20257): 1800 units/7382 ac ■ 2.44 units/10 acresnrTc 5.From an "Average Lot Size" basis: - current (1992): average 6.6 acres/lot - build-out (2025): average 4.1 acres/lot (assuMS no significant zoning changes) M ittlf III -^- ..... r4: ■;ir 1Ip•^-ll%# ^ . >V arf ■ ■*'fe $i: iisW... |ifr^' -W=- '’..... 4-" p^-v-. J ..• - .-W • - li «r « Ife- ^" ]ii%r^''.ffc.l:k-vfe%. - .'■?-v^;v " V:--' H«t Council Rural Area Policy - Data CompilationJttlia 23 r 1992 Page 2 6. Densities by section: Section Sec7 2 Sec. 3 Sec. 4 Sec. 5 Sec. € Sec. 7 Sec. 9 Sec. 10 Sec. 11 Sec. 25 Sec. 26 Sec. 27 Sec • Sec. Sec. Sec. 31 Sec. 32 Sec. 33 Sec. Sec. Sec. Non-MUSA Area* (Acres)rif^ 28 29 30 34 35 36 640 635 350 53f 72 128 310 65 308 309 290 153 287 300 640 605 360 139 272 535 Niimber of Average Existing Density Lot Residential (Units Per Size Units 10 Acres)(Acres) 53 l.l8 8.5 116 1.81 5.5 123 1.94 5.2 112 3.20 3.1 52 0.97 10.3 10 1.29 7.2 9 0.70 14.2 75 2.41 4.1 21 3.23 3.1 29 0.94 10.6 60 1.94 5.2 72 2.48 4.0 26 1.70 5.9 11 0.38 26.1 19 0.62 15.8 83 1.30 7.7 58 0.96 10.4 53 1.47 6.8 28 2.01 5.0 42 1.54 6.5 62 1.16 8.6 7382 Ac 1114 1.5Overall (* Does not include surface waters or existing Hwy 12 R.O.W.) 6.6 Ac dearly# our existing overall density already exceeds the 1 unit per 10 acres guideline. Only 6 of 21 sections have not reached the 1 in 10 density# and these could in total accept approxiiiately 40 additional residential units before the 1 in 10 density is exceeded. yne above numbers do not include vacant buildable lots already subdivided. Our latest count indicates there are ajMroximately 70 vacant buildable lots in the 2 acre and 5 acre tones, which could be built on at any time, further increasing our non-conformity with the 1 in 10 density guideline. Exclusive of golf courses, country clubs, and park lands, we Ruve approximately 214 parcels of unsewered land that further subdividable under current soning standards, with a potentiai for creating an additional 400 - 500 buildable lots. ri-. in ■A}?-:. <4? . : ‘ .- V *--- m'^ # '■f:: , ■■ m- ffH-or^nW. li.' •-■ <• ?; f$- vK-'-v: •; .\ ' 'V : nn V !;:'»v'^- ptS,. ‘ ~ ' i ,, 1.'.- ?ry-£;« ■M\,- |ii' iHl Met Council Rural Area Policy June 23r 1992 Page 3 - Data Compilation Bov are other cities handling this? The Planner from Hassan Township indicated they started a Comp Plan Amendment in January of this year. They proposed a build-out unsewered density of 1800 units, even though the 64/640 Standard would have only allowed 1200 units. Their 1800 proposal was rejected by Met Council. It was his impression that they will likely agree to starting a septic inspection program, will adopt Chapter 7080 and even higher standards for commercial and industrial septic systems, and will make some agreement with the City of Rogers, who runs their own sewer plant; but since Hassan aaes no viable sanctions that Met Council could impose on them, they will probably refuse to agree to the 64/640 density Standards. The City of Rosemount has 2.5 to 5 acre minimum lot sizes, as well as an agricultural zone. They are in the midst of a Comp Plan Amendment and are still allowing development of 2.5 to 5 acre lots but those developments must also have creditable land set aside to meet the 1 in 10 density requirements. Their planner expects that this will eventually result in pressures to develop the lands being used for credit today, leading to future problems. The City of Medina already had development restrictions in place based on soil types, which in the past has yielded densities near the 1 in 10 standard. Medina also has significant portions of Baker Park which is mostly creditable for higher densities and other portions of the City. (The Planner from Bassan indicated that in his dealings with Met Council they indicated no density credits could be transfered from section to section, but had to be within a section. This is one item we'll have to clarify). The City of Minnetrista has some areas zoned for 5 acre lots, but the majority of the city is 10 acre density zoning. Their planner indicates he is in the process of advising property owners of the new Met Council policies, anticipating that many landowners will develop before the door closes. t is the probable will be the p regnii time fr in which ccMpliance with S4/B40 red? Per the February 10, 1992 mamo from Robert Overby and as indicated by Barb Senness, any Ccxnp Plan Amendment which adds 40 seres or more to the Metropolitan Urban Service Area or any "siibstantial” revision, update, rewrite or addition to a chapter or element of the existing Corap Plan, is considered a •major tndment* which triggers a 64/640 review. Our current amendment 1 \.:.^r»>l’tA' :' '■ V.%i. ;^i^- •■ ^■i^- ::Vj’:> , • iri^sr'.'. ,.» 'r. «■■ i,; t-- rw ,#•' ' tiii ■■•’1lp. ^0% ’-'^v K. 3it;.',-i- •: .wm^iimm, Met Council Rural Area Policy - Data Compilation June 23, 1992 Page 4proposes a 3 acre residential lot at 650 North Brown Road which the City allowed to connect into the adjacent City of Long Lake sewer system in 1986; the 4 acres adjacent to Wayzata Country Club/North Ferndale, which was recently platted into two 2 acre building sites; the 24 acre Long Lake sewer property; and 140 acres o£ area along North Shore Drive and Old Crystal Bay Road which encompasses 20 properties which were served with sewer either in 1963 (adjacent to the original Orono trunk line) or which were part of the North Shore/Scotch Pine Lane project in 19tl. Arguably, we are proposing only 31 acres of new service area, because the 140 acres near Noerenburg Park has been sewered and connected for 10 years or more, and consititutes no change in flows to the Metropolitan Sewer System. However, we have been advised that, even though Met Council has a history of allowing US to connect new sewer projects into their system without a prior MUSA revision, this policy can no longer be followed and Stubbs Bay (199 acres) must be added on to our current MUSA amendeent proposal. Met Council apparently won't officially declare our emendeent major or minor until we provide the additional information requested in February. Glenn Cook and I are currently in the process of compiling this information. It seems likely, however, that it ^ going to be considered a major amendment. Our current Plan Amendment is a response to the 1988 Met Council Systems Statement which directed that we address certain issues and update our Comp Plan to be consistent with Met Council Sewer Policies. This was to be completed by January 1990. The City asked for and received a formal extension to October 31, 1990. The Met Council informally approved extensions of that deadline through the actual submission of our Sewer Plan Amendment in January 1992, which suggests that they in the past have not been intent on forcing Comp Plans to be revised into conformity in a specific time fiame, even when such edict takes the form of a Systems Statement. The City may have unknowingly got itself into a box by agreeing to proceed with MUSA line revision for the Long Lake sewer plant property in a timely manner. At the time that agreement was made, the City did not have any expectation that Met Council would be forcing the issue of inconsistent density policies, given their complacency of the previous dozen years while the City developed on its merry way pursuant to the 1980 Comprehensive Plan and the 1988 Comprehensive Plan Amendment. wmmm r.! ip"' ibi"" m i'p »■; . , ^.. %r?p ■■■^v-huf 'Pipi #■ W" - " ■tm i& K-^ 'V- if'-’i'''' #1^:' lt,|. ■■ ;':r^ i ,v ’ V , ■' !;i'f. I: ■ ■ p:- Met Council Rural Area Policy June 23, 1992 Page 5 - Data Compilation Currently, Met Council suggests they will not approve niajor Comp Plan Amendments until city policies are consistent with density standards. Further, Met Council suggests that some time 1993 they will issue a Systems Statement, which is a more formalised requirement that cities revise their plans to be consistent with Met Council policies, or presumably suffer %fhatever consequential sanctions might be imposed by Met Council. Does Orono qualify for an •exception* under the Met Council cxitsria? 1. The Met Council Policy states "exceptions to the policies for the rural area will be considered only for communities that cannot meet the policy because of the existing subdivisions or land development". Such exception would be based on how well we *'*'^** protected good agricultural land (probably not pertineit to our situation) pj*otecttd wetlands and other environmentally sensitive areas implemenved performance standards for on-site sewage disposal .systems that are consistent witn the Met Council's Wastewater Treatment and Handling Policy Plan adopted a comprehensive Plan consistent with all Metro Development Guide chapters, especially those for the metropolitan systems (sewers, transportation, aviation and parks). 2. 3. 4. Xtem 1 probably does not uffect .is. We have more than adequately dealt with Items 2 and 3 for many years. Item 4, unfortunately, is based on Met Council's interpretation of whether we are consistent with their metro plans. My impression la that Met Council will find us not consistent with elements of the sewer plan that relate to development density. In order for Met Council to grant an exception to the density policy, they expect us to provide detailed backgroun information on our state of development., the physical features of the lana, and an analysis of how it might be developed under current planning and soning. However, because we are for the most part already in excess of the upper limit on the 1 in lo development density, it is questionablt (based on statements ^de by Met Council staff to date) whether they would "support" an exception that would allow our remaining undeveloped lands to further develop at anything greater than 1 unit per 10 acres. % V -■••,' «irp .:>■ 'i-: ^>^;Yr :ii" m. .» .t-?; &: Wl- TJit*.rv. !L-^. !?.%■ it W-’-'*ll%- i%L 'fm. -'lift Met Council Rural Area Policy June 23, 1992 Page 6 - Data Compilation In fact. Met Council staffers have suggested that the type of exception they would consider granting would be to restrict from further development enough property to offset our existing density excesses. However, on both a section by section basis HD overall basis, such undeveloped land for "credit" does not exist. Based on what Met Council staff indicated in February, the "exception" policy would do nothing more than grandfather our unsewered development and at best allow the remaining im^^Ysioped property to develop at densities no greater than 1 unit per 10 acres. This is not an acceptable "exception". hhnt sanctions can Met Council impose on the City if we refuse to cdMunge our policies? Barb Senness took a very conservative and strong viewpoint when asked this question at the work session. She indicated that Stubbs Bay would possibly not be allowed to connect into the iu4t.ro system (actually we are connecting into City lines which flow to a metro interceptor). ^is policy would seem to be counterproductive in the broad scheme of why the Metropolitan Council even exists, especially in light of our past history of dealing with other areas expected to be sewered per the 1980 Comprehensive Plan which Met Council accepted. h second sanction they might impose would be to deny extension of the MUSA line as requested in our current proposed Coap Plan Amendment. This leaves the question of the agreement with Long Lake. Our first goal needs to be separation of the Stubbs Bay issue from the density issues. Pacts That Should Be Persuasive la Our Favor Stubbs Bay was indicated in 1980 Comp Plan as 1 of 5 areas that might need to be sewered during 1980-1590. The other 4 were allowed to be sewered and connected to MMCC system without question, because there was capacity in the system. 3.Met Council did not require prior approval of a MUSA amendment to connect those 4 areas." (Today they suggest this must have been an oversight on their part). .1^ > i h*-■ft; ' i: • ' ...?^'> i ftet Council Rural Area Policy - Data Compilation June 23, 1992 Page 7 %- 4.There is capacity in MWCC lines foi the Stubbs Bay Project. 5. V" fW ^ Stubbs Bay is existing development which Met Council by past action has allowed to be connected in 4 other Serving Stubbs Bay does not change the MWCC system needs since zoning won't change. This is a planned expansion of laterals to solve existing problems’. li- iW' Since Stubbs Bay is existing density, connecting or not connecting it has no negative impact on our rural density compliance. It actually eliminates one of our most non*~compliant areas. t Minnetonka Bluff/West Perndale/f^orth Shore/Marinas Project eoMMinced Pall 1980, completed ivugv.st 1981, MUSA amended by Resolution No. 1337 in November i981> Crystal Bay Project (OOmsisnced in 1985, completed June 1986, Comprehensive Plan not amended until February 1987. In these two most recent projects, prior MUSA amendment was not required. r, Since the initial position was taken by Barb Senness ceiieerning the approval of the extension of the MUSA to include the Stubbs Bay area, staff has met with Ms. Senness and other Met Council staff to review the Stubbs Bay project and the comprehensive plan approval process. Met Council staff have limdioeted a favorable reaction to the "tubbs Bay project itself, flioy have also indicated the rural developa»nt density issue will not stand in the way of the approval of a comprehensive plan >nt for the Stubbs Bay project. Isv —— y ■« a 3 ■j ^ * v %#/».•fc // m *■ K ■‘r : .<' •■< ■- Ron MoorsOf City Administrator Tom Kuehn, Finance Director July 10, 1992 Ordinance Amendment to 1992 Pee Schedule ^0.%X % ITS:Letter from MN Department of Health 6-10-92 Orono News Release Published 6-29-92 Ordinace Amendment ii api T ■ V i V ;vXv* life. Ill m The Minnesota Department of Health has directed each City op>^ratin9 a public water supply to collect an annual $5.21 fee from •vtry service connection served by the City. This fee is to be remitted to the Department of Health to pay for a safe water testing program siandated by federal law. We ha e implesiented the fee f''^r ♦he second quarter billing beginning this year. The attached ordinance amendment implements this fee within the 1992 Fee Schedule. It is requested that Council adopt the ordinance, which will be published July 20, 1992. FROPOBO MOTION: Moved by Seconded by to adpot Ordinance # ,4?''i- •i*T ■ _ _, Second Series, adding the safe drinking water testing program fee effective with the 1992 second quarter billing. Ayes _ _, Nays_ _. ill « 'tv. vr? Effi m m HI m;:, -1 i V. ■ 'fer ■' y - :r..1^IFm$ORDINANCE NUMBER SECOND SERIES nl®# , Ml OROmANCB ANODIHG ORDINANCE HDMBBR 99, SECOND SBRIBS* ADOPTED MOTCaber 25, 1991 ENTITLED *1992 FEB SCHEDOLE* IK- • *: #.The City Council of the City of Orono ordains; Ordinance No. 99, Mv»‘ Second Series adopted November 25, 19 91, and entitled "An OrdinanceK-B|l Adopting the 1992 Fee Schedule" is hereby amended to read: =:FOELZC WORKS DEPARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES WS'. rf' ^ ^ '■ utility Service Rates - Effective 1992 Second quarter billing, end annually thereafter on the second quarter billing. ."•im'm&y Municipal Water - Charge per service connection per year $5.21 for federally mandated safe drinking water testing program administered by Minneasota Department of Health. ^ ' • The Ordinance shall be published in the Laker and Pioneer iNWSpaper and shall be effective with the 1992 second quarter utility billing. wP - Adopted by the City Council ^ Of July 1992. ♦"he City of Orono on this 13th day fc.Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor life-II Dorothy N. Ballln. City Clerk ■•V. " V mm •3 ,* K-■V #v ;>i ; r‘ •',,-^y i]if '- e u I; Viv'- ■K-..^v-V=^ S-’= ■r. /V‘ :''-:rA« ,'•: ■■ V- . i-A'.-- •,T .r •:, '• 'V-r' . ■-•'■V' i ! . ./ v^■ ;r._ Vr ■' ' >• ' '■ ^■ ■-^j; V- ipII. *■ft VV.-VV 1 MlniMsota Oapartment of HaalthDivision of Environmental Health 92S Osiaware Street Southeast P.O. Box 59040 Minneapolis. MN 55459-0040 (612) 627 5100 J DATE: TO : FROM: June 10, 1992 (^•|ty Councils, Townsjnp Boards, Rural Water Districts i4 1 2 i3-- Marlene E. Marsc Coinroissioner a ^ ^ 4 Protectln^^the health of people consuming water waterjuppli« is a ™;lbtlit; ^hii thrMinneiotro^partSent of Health (HDH) assumes from the federal flovSnient. In Minnesota, the MOH must enforce the requirements of the federal Safe SrInkInG Water Act and regulations developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection SStllcy ?or pJovidiAg safe drinking water. The federal government has determined that t?e nuaoers of parameters monitored should increase from 2j to 3o parame.er^. the 1992 state legislative session, the MOH was authorized to assess a fee of $5.21 pe water service connection to cover the total state costs of the program. The fee is to he paid by a public water supply owned or operated by a city, town or water user district. (Laws of Minnesota 1992, Chapter 513, Article 6, Section 2.) This Is to notify you of the following: K You must collect $5.21 annually from every service connection ^erved by your water supply as of July 1 of that year. 2.You must pay the Department of Revenue one fourth of the total yearly fee each calendar quarter. The first quarterly payment is due on or before September 30, 1992. A water supply with fewer than 50 service connections may make one payment annually starting no later than June 30, 1993. y 3.If you do not submit payment within 30 days of the due date, you must P«y «" additional late fee. The late fee is 5 percent of the actual amount of the fees collected on service connections. To assist with the payment of the fee, the MDH will soon be distributing coupon booklets that will aid you in returning the fee amount to the Department of Revenue. To Inform the MOH of the number of service connections served by your water supply,^ drinking water testing program mandated by federal law." We hope to make collection of this fee as simple as possib.s. Public ^ Staff are available to answer questions concerning the fee collection requirements 612/627-5170. of this fee at this time. Thank you for your cooperation in this effort. We know you share our concern that safe l^ifdHng water continue to be provided to the citizens of Minnesota. MEMtViR:mjk cc: Water Operator fc-.i#i%'P NEWS RELEASE ■i-MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SETS FEE FOR TESTING DRINKING WATER E£f«etiv« July I, 1992, the Minnesota Department of 2lr!eted each city operating a public water supply to collect for Deo.??ment o^f Health^^ f«e of $5.21 from every iS?vf« connection .otvod by the water supply. Health has indicated this fee is to pay for a Safe TMtine program mandated by federal law. Orono :rrtVu‘’';e«VVq«Vt.r Utiuty bill. This fee will be collected once each year with the second quarter billing. ml-. mm r' -r-fcv-: ■ r. ;, / ■ - ? ■■ • ;y-V- w cp'f-- Hi:- i i •ps; M ,i I .8 ■^4 . \ ..j A.Ak. /■- ^0. TOs FRONt DA¥8t RIt tj/i,Ron Moorse» City Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director June 23, 1992 Pedestrian Crosswalk Old Crystal Bay Road x:X % Recently Real Lawson, Assistant to the Superintendent of the Orono Schools, advised me that the New Life Bible Church Day Care children Qoe the play9round at the Orono Elementary School. The concern is that the children need to cross Old C.'ystal Bay Road without the benefit of a crosswalk. As you are aware, there is a plan forthcoming to provide bike/hike trails on the east side of old Crystal Bay Road. One of the concerns was crossing Old Crystal Bay Road to get bikes and pedestrians to the school campus. merefore a pedestrian crosswalk would serve that purpose as well as the children crossing on a regular basis. jmn.. Zt is therefore recosunended that a crosswalk be established on Old Crystal Ray Road 25 feet north of the New Life Bible C'lurch driveway. It is further recommended that the Public Works nepi^rtment place signage as appropriate and annually or as needed to ho\* a standard crosswalk painted at that location. ch ■'V'', iP'" -'fm ■ 'f?’:;/.-5 ^rV*'v - ‘ ^ ■ IMm"- i i i i % isd Bi ■'-r- If- k .j'f.-^t.- i*. ■ t -*' 1 ’Iwfe. -' ^ ..i(iIP -'TJl' ■h: ' 4 a'*::r ' -"^flp’Sfe m i'. f-mm ‘ - - <.%'■ I Mm t y*; y:"':''%if'/-^ V St:, tw- .«•■ %x.: '■■ M:■' mrnm t;'^' ■m.i: -» ■ ■s|»‘-M ■'{p Wk' -^w , i- .M - :•! .•AV-*TotWzomx Datos Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron, Moorse, City Administrator July 9, 1992 Sobjectt Stubbs Bay Sewer Assessment Update lents Assessment Proposal from the Cygnet and Leaf Area % %o 1 Attacl The Cygnet and Leaf Street property owners have submitted a new proposal concerning the property owners' share of the sewer cost. The proposal would place the assessment at $11,400 per unit. The proposal has been accepted by all but one of the property owners in the area. Staff had most recently Indicated an assessment of $11,700 would be acceptable. Council now needs to determine whether to settle at the $11,400 amount. The $11,700 amount is 62% of the total cost per unit. The $11,400 amount is 60.4% of the total cost per unit. The additional City cost would be $9,000. Although the proposal is lower than staff had indicated it needed to be, the additional cost to the City is relatively small in terms of the total project cost. In addition, the proposal will settle the issue with ail but one of the property owners. The $100,000 legal contingency amount would still have $20,000 remaining if the City accepted all current proposals as followss Project Area Current Assessment Proposed Assessment Bayside North Bederwood Oxford Cygnet & Leaf $11,585 12.990 14.990 12,995 $11,000 11.500 13.500 11,400 In addition to the legal contingency amount, the project budget also includes $35,000 for easment acquisition and $40,000 for legal expenses. Based on the foregoing discussion, it is staff's recosunendation that the Cygnet and Leaf proposal be accepted. This would leave 9 outstanding appeals: 4 in the base project area, 2 in the Bederwood area, 1 in the Bayside North area, and 2 in the Cygnet and Leaf area (1 is Gronberg's appeal of the 100% assessment on his vacant lot). ’.r i'il.A. .J •r Cj99':k [CTTYOfIillSdil^Ci / 5'.*"' '■\ o . fY^CT<=;»^<^CL. «o ^ (2l^ W eisee • • • A ^ «■ o.«?ww«_CL_ ^■''‘^a-v:!' h'W- ■■' ”^S ^75- ,476 -o(5-ci pi■Siwfcj.::- ^I&-'-mB' ■ - =A- : •V^ ^ ■ - -?.- (■.■'L'-i^ y • .'.v-‘j»-)rt'««**•* #^- e-g|-',#i' U4* li 4 1 /’'g)€tX i ts# ' - "' cv.,^<2. ^vjCso O«-0 ^ u ^ \,* tt..'«- OiA^\ O^ pp V-’ *''-\ >\\c:^ Drc>r€!>e>^ \-^w CT> V - w^ ® .( -.oiH? C 7 rxjccLC\ .4:W^<^s ----^YjL^ea- >i V wv€4J0|[ ij :IV y *\^ r*“ ou»fw^ vO ,« -.r* ■Ii < • 1?^ sy fe.^1 !■ f;' ^. ^-..;:c -r p ;rH- U, ;■. -,r ::- ^ :7l‘- / ■i; w: , iX- V J yv# : J', •' ' ’ " ;>.; •i-/' J*'- '%. iVfK' X&': :ii,^ f#' *^is. m UA i^z'^cj'liGMS.iSuTULkiJune 29, 1992 Orono Mayor and City Council POBOX66 Crystal Bay, Mo 55323 UiJk jB issa RE Stubbs Bay Sewer Project Settlement Proposal Cygnet Place and Lear Street Group « f f A ^ ^0 0^^ Dear Mayor and Council Members: The Cygnet Place and Leaf Street residents who have signed this memo agree to participate in the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project for a maximum total assessment of $11,400 perpropetw. inese proper^ owners will agree ; o particip^ m 2)Todi .’III 3) To cede all reouired iplete the project on Cygne Stubbs Bay Sewer Proj^. ue all litigatio:! in connection with this pn)ject . A A i.i:! litigi • We submit that a portion of the fimds, which the City of Orono resoved fiM’ this project, be utilized in reducing our per property assessment.• :i >Hi I Thank y<Hi fOT your patience and favorable consideration of this proposal Respectfully, NAME ADDRESS S ^ ^ ^ >9^ ~^A 7.f=& Cunni± Plx^ . ynr\<o )T/''2St> 6Ha>>oeT C Cr ^ f~ S"t^ S7' Aft- • ..W. m-ipA®r a Jt*-' if Wfi; r |a|# 00 '■ •'aA-U alfe,, a; Ife;’^ ft# I# rfc*!-<i.-1-'^; V, Stubbs Bay Sewer Project Settlement Proposal Cygnet Place and Leaf Street Group Page 2 NAME ADDRESS .rn af < f /3o L'O ..T..-.-A '-V t y A (kluHi 1‘i^ 0^i4e^^t / 3 5"'ace. y ^SSpa,■P- rA.\»r.. ^ ^ ■ ■ ■'.t p#f -mm Slubbs Bay Sewer Prefect Settlement Proposal lace and Leaf Street Group Page 3G>5oet Place ai NAME ADDRESS }90 ^-9 W doC) >• fhfihii- yvl 4 I J % vl .'I 'v i m.Vk;-.Sl-H T Nr. >j ^'■ fi ^4 ■J «5>ii ^*..1 ^ ^ i' ‘ if‘ 1?^ > •( . .■ ■-W •..' *Mi-'W''. ly j'ij .. .Ill § Tf‘. tr''.* fr i\:- V'r/' -r i* I, . , 'I.;-. r«i 'fi&. ■ To I Mayor Peterson and Orono City CouncilFrRon, Moorse, City Administrator h/'^^ f'-f Datas July 10, 1992 /J % Sobjectx Stubbs Bay Sewer Project Update V, The Stubbs Bay Sewer Project is being delayed due to a Comprehensive Plan Amendment review by the Metropolitan Council. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment is required because the project involves an extension of the MUSA. The proper sequence of events in obtaining approval for a sewer project is the approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the Metropolitan Council, then efter Met Council approval the MWCC and MPCA review and approve the project. Orono has historically not followed this sequence. The Comprehensive Plan Amendment has been submitted after the oower project has been completed. This has never held up approval of the sewer project. Met Council staff have indicated the Comprehensive Plan Amendment must be approved at least at a staff level before the sewer project can move ahead. The PCA and MWCC have Indicated they will not approve a permit for the project until Met Council staff indicates a* proval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. City staff have submitted the information required for the Met Council staff to review the Comprehensive Plan Amenument. Met Council staff have indicated it may be possible to determine a recommendation concerning the Comprehensive Plan Amendment by July 17. City staff have encouraged Met Council staff to respond as quickly as possible. If the sewer project proceeds upon approval by Mot Council Staff, there is still a risk that the Metropolitan Council itself will not approve the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, hue to the clear need for the project and environmental impacts of not proceeding with the project, it is staff’s recommendation that the project should proceed upon approval by the Met Council staff. Isv '■' •v.^M-•a:'::' =V Ife v^ :■ yS:a,!i‘S^ :|;’■ ■#;Tos Wromx Dat«t Subjects Mayor Peterson and Orono Cit/ Council Ron, Moorse, City AdmirJ str^‘-.or (^0.1^ July 9, 1992 Resolution Calling for Bay Sewer Project e Oale of Bonds for the % If the Council accepts th» Cyinet and Leaf assessment proposal, there would be onlj ' pi'p**rtieE out of 137 still inv' \v jd in an appeal. These ' pri k ' es re scattered among the various project areas. Batec. on » s 1 ^ number of appeals, staff's recommendation would be *. o d project. The estimated cost of the ♦ .jjuct is $2,000,000. The original project cort e&»-. ite was pl,998,000. A $100,000 contingency amount was added or potential legal costs ]f0la^O(S to assessment appeals and easement acguisiticn. This was in addition to the $70,000 amount included in the original project budget -r legal costs and easement acquisition. The City's consulting engineer has indicated that due to the low nusUder of assessr^ent appeals remaining and because the assessment agreeswnts which have been negotiated have included the provision of all nacassary easements at no cost to t City# xt is possible to eliminate the $100,000 legal contingency from the project oudget. The project is to be financed with Genercil Obligation Bonds. The first step in the bonding process is to adopt a resolution calling for the sale of the bonds. A resolution will be provided for Council adoption at the meeting. Isv U1 yi v»Ci P 05•05«•0 yi b M In CDc c o o O O o o f b o 4^4« M > ^ rg o« cn Cfl N* ig C/« 0 ^ tg as - ig C4 4b CA O - rg oi rg 4b CA •*3 ^ (g C4 4b s - rg Oi 4b > - rg u 4b 2 - ^S fg ;4 ? I N> 0 ? 1 0 T1 I s. I a 3 5C M %au i I Kf D3 O C w t: 'i- f X, IfCEKLY MARKET RATES - AS OF CLOSE: FRIDAY JULY 10, 1992 REPRESENTATIVE YIELDS U.S. TREASURIES TAX-FREE MUNICIPALS NAT WKLY c: 3 NO 3.28 -.02 6 MO 3.36 -.06 1 YR 3.59 -.10 2 YR 4.34 -.20 S YR 5.90 -.13 7 YR 6.43 -.05 10 YR 6.92 UNCH 30 YR 7.63 UNCH MAT 1993 1997 2C02 2007 2012 AAA 2.60 4.55 5.35 5.75 5.90 AA 2.90 4.75 5.50 5.90 6.05 3 5 5 6 6 A 30 05 80 20 35 BAA 3.75 5.40 6.15 6.55 6.70 ECONOMIC DATA: H1..4>$500 NLN M2..-$7.3 BLN MEN CAE SALES (LATE JUNE) ... 7.6 MLN OOMSUNER CREDIT (NAY) ... -$2.41 BLN INITIAL JOBLESS CLAIMS (6/27) ... -4K PRODUCER PRICES (JUNE) ... 0.2% NAT 3 YEAR 5 YEAR 7 YEAR 10 YEAR 30 YEAR CORPORATES AA 5.15 6.30 6.70 /. 30 7.80 A 5.30 6.60 6.90 7.40 7.90 SELECTED INTEREST RATES THIS WEEK LAST WEEK 92 HIGH 92 LOW YEAR AGO PRIME RATE PED PUNDS DISCOtniT RATE DEI 30 BOND/10 YRS •BI 30 BOND/20 YRS RBI 3S BOND/30 YRS BLUE UST/MILL$ 30 DAY VISISIT SUPPLY/MILL$ 6.00 3 1/8 3.00 5.63 6.17 6.36 876.0 3387.5 6.00 3 3/8 3.00 5.64 6.38 6.55 1153.9 2855.5 6.50 4 1/4 3.50 6.13 6.79 6.87 1955.7 7249.2 6.00 3 1/8 3.00 5.63 6.17 6.36 683.7 2279.4 8.50 5 3/4 5.50 6.27 7.07 7.19 1189.2 3798.9 COUPONS CHANCED TO CURRENT 90 DAY CO] 1$YR GNMA 7.50%6.87 MY 6.97 BEY 30 YR GNMA 7.50%7.45 NY 7.57 BEY 30 YR GINIA S.00%7.52 NY 7.64 BEY 30 YR GNMA s.sot 7.52 NY 7.64 BEY 30 YR GNMA 9.00%7.54 NY 7.66 BEY ERCIAL PAPER 1 YEAR CD 3 YEAR CD 5 YEAR CD 3.40 3.50 4.85 5.70 i:-\.‘:R/■/bflfe^ «;■.¥0t raoNt MTBt MBs Ron Moorse, City Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director July 9, 1992 Change Order #1» Lift Station #9 *^C/C/f. % /V ^ * ■" % Recently the city Council approved the bid award for Lift Station #9 Rehabilitation. Unfortunately, we have been experiencing failures due to obsolete equipment and find it necessary to initiate a pump by-pass immediately to avoid sewage backups. 6; Therefore, we will have to rent pumps for eight to ten weeks earlier then expected. w'-A:n% ■mi ■ The pump rental and underground by-pass line will increase the cost of the project by $8,200.00. Therefore, I recommend approving change order #1 to New Mech Companies, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $8,200.00. m The total amount of the project is still within budget. Ml} P#' r.* : l-mf Slv i0. Ilim-m 'ft, fia.giiPfs', W-tf 5 ’f‘‘ •- 1 J - fei-'W' fr':?^: [r'i'v. y'- ^ "k' " ' S '"- Ron Moorse, City Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director July 8, 1992 Bid Award of Rebid Items New Facility Th# attaehad lattar from John Davies, Cons*- uction Manger for the new facility# Indicates recommendation of rebid items for the new facility. ^fha only itam that was not budgeted is the sealer for the floor in the Ftlblic Works garage and will have to be subtracted from the contingency. fe-B! .'y - M ■5® i' fefe. r -v' • ■■ I'-oi Elpf. .........%. .10^ . ■ Ir f.-pfe;-'te- . :S^-. 'Sft IpIf ■:r>-' - % ■ . A f‘ir';'V »■ - 'r-1- .- ■'r./ wp.. •..». ’ • fer- i^p.v; . v.:‘P^k4 fll §m Wt *&' rf/\ ttiP* July 8.1992 Mr. Ron Moorse Gty of Orono 1355 Brown Road South Crystal Bay. MN 55323 KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CONTKACTOKS \ ( OSSTRUCTIOS MANAGtKb__________________ Re Orono Public Works Equipment Package K/A Project #4059 Dear Ron: The following is a bid tabulation of several of the bid sections that we put out for a re-bid. 1 have noted (*) our recommendation for award. I have listed the Imdget amount we were carrying in or May 5, 1992, update. 1.Floor Scaler at Public Wqj ks •Technical Surfacing. Inc. Division 7 Corporation Gresser Concrctc/Masonry S8.8:'0.00 $9,000.00 $10,372.00 Budget -0- Insulation of Attic at Ciiv Qfllccs •Citywidc Insulation Arrow Industries $10,220.00 $15,240.00 $11,200.00 3.Ceramic •Dale Tile Tivin City Tile Grazzini Tile $21,292.00 $23,820.00 $23.760 00 $24,000.00 Structural and Miscellaneous Steel Erection •Amcrcct $15,145.00 Danny's $21,000.00 KMH $27,970.00 Western $20,265.00 $18300.00 Please review this information and call me if you have any questions. Let me know if I can proceed with the award of these contracts as soon as you can. Very truly yours, lUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY in Davies Project Manager JD/Ip cc; Ion Ran . BKP MMMiOftolh OKtisioii 525 So-Jlh Stf—t. MinrMUiwin. N*N S5404 <Stil n2-72S1 FAX ;)24I7)9 falttii Opponuniw tmptovw f isi '*.’4 . i 'VT •->■ r ]', ;SfA !■ ;- • '■ k.:kp. . vWLltw i •^r.^ ■y'' 71iL%T0» FROMt DATE: RBi Ron Moorsor City Administrator Tom Kuehn, Finance Director / July 8, 1992 1991 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report V., ^<? 'W/.<^o Thm auditors have completed their review of the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the year ended December 31, 1991. A separata letter of comments on the 1991 audit will be presented to Council at the July 27th Council meeting. The CAFR is for inclusion on the July 13th agenda for Council review and acceptance. If Council should have questions for the auditor, a representative of Malloy, Karnowski, Radosevich h Co. will be available to be at a subsequent Counci1 meeting. I would request that Council accept the annual financial report and indicate if the auditor should be at a following Council meeting. Proposed Kocion: Moved by seconded by to approve the Independent Auditor's Report as presented in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Reporw for the year ended December 31, 1991. Motion: Ayes Nayes ■ } r • 'i.- ' ■S'i;' 'V. ;4’?J ^ ;-V5 ■- '^'. jfs'V rP'^' -‘i).7- fefc- -■-■ ■( , >. i ATT ■r';,Y , ■: W^A -fe. - - ■'IHi -•. 'r.' -i‘ i;': •' ••^’ ^^: ‘■’^‘ ■ . mk .,„pS'Ss silii' ■pfWl*' ■‘fsHs »^2-■•’■' - C*.'-••;.■■ ■■ ; • ■-5r f:mm/ ■ ^ P‘H Cily of Orono» Mkinc : I > * Ifcmtpin Couniy Mil L ifimfive Annoal Firancial R(- » I Ite Ended Dcmbcr 31,1991 ;i!%/ . AW:'W m- if' hf‘- ~ ^ 4,^i. 1'.^ CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Year Ended December 31, 1991 Prepared by Department of Finance Thoir ’ M. Kuehn Finance Director m iMiihiMliai * i i i ' 'i ■i ■> M ■K‘I Srf'^;lI I I CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTAComprehensive Annual Financial Report Table of Contents INTRODUCTORY SECTION Transmittal Letter Organitational Chan Cky Council and Other Officials Certificate of Achievement Award nNANOAL SECTION INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT GENERAF^ PURPOSE HNANCIAL STATEMENTS • OVnVlEW (COMBINED) Combined Balance Sheet - All Fund Types and Account Groups Combined Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance - All Governmental Fund Types and Expendable Trust Fund Combined Statement of Revenue. Expenditures and Qiangcs in Fund Balance • Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual - <3eneral and Special Revenue Funds Combined Statement oi Revenue, Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings • Proprietary Fund Type Combined Statement of Cash Flows Proprietary Fund Type Notes to Financial Statements COMBINING AND INDIVIDUAL FUND STATEMENTS (jeneral Fund Comparative Balance Sheet Statement of Revenue. Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual Special Revenue Funds Combining Balance Sheet Combining Statement of Revenue. Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Park Fund Stmement of Revenue. Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance • Budget (G.AAP Basts) and Actual Impfovcmerst and Equipmem Outlay Fund Statement of Revenue. Expenditures, and Changes m Fund Balance - Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual Building Capital Outlay Fund Suuement of Revenue. Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance • Budget (GAAP Basis) arnt Actual Exhibit Page I • 11 12 13 14 15 - 16 A-l 17 - 20 A-2 21 - 22 A-3 23 *24 A-4 25 A 5 26*27 28 *50 51 B1 52 B-2 53-57 58 C-l 59 C-2 60 C*3 61 C-4 62 C 5 63 i ....... :v - .T TV'^v =«- ,vT-'-, jrs^ji!- VPfI ii-teI I [V I r>i:^ I fe t...I ^:v- I If''I I I I CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Table of Contents (continued) COMBINING AND INDIVIDUAL FUND STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) Debt Service Funds Combining Balance Sheet Combining Statement of Revenue. Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Bilance Coital Project Funds Confining Balance Sheet Combining Statement of Revenue. Expenditures, and Changes in *^und Balance Emerprise Funds Combining Balance Sheet Confining Statement of Revenue. Expenv s. and Changes in Retained Earning> Combining SUrtement of Cash Flosvs Water Operating Fund Comparative Balance Sheet Comparative Statement of Revenue. Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings Comparative Statement of Casn Floxss Sewer Opetattng Fund Comparative Balance Sheet Comparative Statement of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes in Retameil Earnings Comparative Statement ot Cash Flows Golf Course Operating Fund Comparative Balance Sheet Comparative Statement of Re.enue. Expenses, and Changes in Raa:ned Earnings Comparative Statement of Cash Flows Tnar and Agency Funds Fiduciary Fund Type - Expendable Trust and Agency Funds Comtining Balvice Sheet Statonent of Revenue. Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance - Flexible Benefit Plan ExpendaMe Trust Fund Combining Stauement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities * Agency Funds FINANCIAL SCMEDtLLlS Comptiative Schedule of General Fixed Assets by Sr»«’'c< Schedule Ok leneral Fixed Assets by Fu:>ction arnJ Activity Schedule of Changes tn General Fixed Assets by Functk?n and Activity Ftmire Property Tax Levies to Retire Bs’nds Exhibit Page D 1 65-66 D-2 67-68 69 E-1 70 - 71 E-2 72 - 73 74 F-1 75 - 76 F-2 77 - 78 F-3 79 - 80 F-4 81 - 82 F-5 83 F-6 84 F-7 85-86 F-8 87 F-9 88-89 F-lO 90 F 11 91 F-12 92 93 G-1 94 G 2 95 G 3 Schedule %-97 1 98 VA.99 3 100 4 101 4 m ----I,'V!I ti :'i CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Table of Contents (continued) mmncAL section (unaudited ) Qeoiral Revenue by Source Oeneral Expenditures by Function Property Tax Levies and Collections Aasetsed Value or Tax Capacity and Estimated Market Value of Taxable Property Property Tax Rates * Direct and Overlapping Governi %Mclal Assessments Levies and Collectitms Ratio of Net General Bonded Debt to Assessed Value or Tax Capacity and Net Bonded Debt Per Capita Oii^tation of Legal Debt Margin Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt Revenue Bond Coverage - Enterprise Funds Ratio of Anmial Debt Service Expenditures tor General Bonded Di^ to Total General Expenditures Duaofraphic Statistics Property Value, Construction, and Bank Deposits Principal Taxpayers Miscellaneous Statistics Tax Capacity. Tax Levies, and Tax Extension Rates INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL STRUCTURE AND OTHER REQUIRED REPORTS I NRidrot Auditor’s Repon on the Intern4l Control Structure fai Accordance With Government Auditing Standards Independeni Auditor’s Compliance Report Based on an Audit ot die Oenerid Purpose Financial Statements Performed n Accordance Wtah Government Auditing Standards Independem Auuitor’s Repon on Compliance With Minnesota State Laws and Regulations % Table Page 1 102 - 103 2 104 - 105 3 106 • 107 4 108 - 109 5 no - III 6 112 - !’7 7 114 - 115 8 116 9 tl7 10 118 11 119 12 120 13 121 14 127 15 123 lb 124 125 • 126 127 128 ‘ .L- ■I v.f' I I I, I I ^V I f-I r- • •- '• • I 8: ^ W. '-i:r;„ . I W': V:p . ■■ I i^-' P-iK'.f iSmiw fenTc; #■ I li\-. -•-T.-; ’-TJj7 INTRODUCTORY SECTION V*. .A2. ■• .A‘ »;..* . ■^j»'^.'L 4-»t. N;I 1 -V .ir •**^^ I I 0:' I I I f b:r' rgiiI'h- I K itIf- fK/ I ur'-i-. iiPl.r-. r-A-.=- I , - , V*'*' ; : :':V i^'.,-: K I ifir I I I f|‘ # It- CITY of ORONO iM arnimii ■' is ■ Im. . Iwit 1, 1992 To tbt City Council and Citizens of the City of Oronc Hm OHnprchensivt Annual Financial Report of the City of Orono for the fiscal year ending Dtctmlior 31, 1991 it hereby submitted. Respi.nsihiiity for both the accuracy of the data, and the MMts and feimeia of the preientalion. including all disclosures, rests with the City. To the best Inowledd* *nd belief, the enclosed data it accurate in all imuerial respects and is reported in a daaifoed to present fairly the financial position and results of operations of the various hinds and gtCTV^ g roiye of the City. All disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain an understanding of iM City's financial activities have been iiwluded. Tbe Comprehensive Anmtal Financial Report is i^csented m four sections; introductory, financial, MMcal, Mt tevnal control structure and other required reports. The Introductory Section includee thii mnindwil lener, the City’s orfanizatKv.,d chart, a list of principid officials, and • copy of the GFOA OntMIcaae of Irhir rmint Award for th ^ * 1990 Comprsbeittive Anmial Financiid Report. The PlMKial Section Inclttdes the gneral pu., •>*« -.n aKiai scatemenu, the combining and indivKhiai fond Ml, IlnMKlai sc adulcs, and t^.. Inov.'t"’ \ x Auditor’s Report on the general purpoM ffnancial The Staiisttcal Section Indudes selected financiai and demographic information, generally ptMiiBied on a mnhi-year basis. The Internal Control Structure and Other Required Rep«ts Section eonlaiai varkiut Independent Auditor’s repon iMiers on imernal comrol and legal compliance All City funds and eccoum grotqu. departments, commissions, and other organizatkMB over whtdi the Mayor and CRy Oonncil of the City of Orono cserctse oversight responsibility are proMhed in the City of Orano's ComprMMnsivc Arniuai Finafu;iai Report There are no otto organiaationi that when eoMldared would be Inchided in the gvmral pinpost financial stamments. The Oty piiiitiw a varkey of mtmtcipii ewices These include polict pmtectkin. Mreel msHuenaaet^ huBAiM bMpeclIoa, pfonninf and loning. public unprovememi, general adminisiratto servioaa, public wmm Mid mmm utflili«. mA a municipal golf course The City has been in the foreffoai of JoiMfCOOpirilfil tarvlce delivery The City contracts for fire peoieciioii from the ne^hboriag ciiim of Loiig Idle* WeyiMi, Mound, and Maple Plain The City provido police proiectkm and/ur butldtm iMpetMon Mf^deei andfor aninml conmil slices to the cittes of Long Lake. Spring Farh. and IdiMiliiiiati Ranch. The City abo comracts for engineering, tei d. and assessing profmiottal S0vic«i numum^ i -.1 v.ti trr r -'i'’ r* *' ; '■• l- ■v ’ ' i^'ai'-' It. il 7" rV- O'Vs ■ Wf' ■Mr.- ' ‘ ■ uT''' f. ■:.-'t '¥ 'A- Ip ' >' ti- - ■■ O,: -"V ^ ' 'pi'.o, '7.,: . ^ /:■;■ . . >7'-'- -.o- ; tp ■'pp' 0'%;0's K ■^0. ?' O' Si To thf City Council and Citizens of the City of Orono lunt 1. 1992 Economic C ondition and Oiti,(k»k Tbi CHy of Orono wai incorporated effective January 1, 1955 The City is located on the northern shore of Lake M^nnctoidta about IS miles west of Minneapolis Of the City's 24 5 square miles of area, 50% Ii open water or marshland (with a total of 15.1 square miles of land area). Of Lake Minnetonka. 40% of the shordinc and 33% of the lake area is in Orono. TTif City of Orono is a third ring suburb in the seven-county metropt)litan Twin Cities area of MinnMp(rfte/St. Paul and is located on Lake Minnetonka, the tenth largest lake in Minnesota Orono devdopad primarily because of this aesthetic amenity, which is the most heavily used recreational lake in Stale. This heavy use is a result of the quality of its aesthetic appeal, together with its proximity to the metropolitan urban core The City is primarily a residential community with a mixture of se\ eral types of housing together with a small ooounercial district. The City totally surrounds two communities, which are part of the original totsmhip, and substantially surrounds a third community As indicated above, Orono cooperies with tbise chies for the most cost effective provision of Cit) services Orom) is home to many of the mctropolilan area's top executives who appreciate the community’s natural amenities H is anticipated that the positive appeal ot the community, together with the extent of available land, will see the community experiencing continued deveKipment for the next ten years The City is in a strong financial position Because of its strong residential tax base. Orono aiminued in 199! ID have a tax capacity rate that Is the lowest in the County foi communities over 1.000 in population despite the fact that the City ceased receiving k>cal government aids from the State in 1990. The City was allowed to raise the equivalent amount in propeny taxes to offset the loss of aid The Sirenfth of the City's financial condition is reflected in its bond rating of Aal since 1919 The Minnesota Department of Transportation continued the corridor selection process for Highway 12. the three major corridor alternatives each are located in a different pan of C^no. the uncertaimy opneensing the final corritfor selection has significantly reduced the pace of new development in the City. The City is working to expedite the corridiir selection process Once a corridor is selected, it is iWtiripMart that it would take a minimum ot seven to ten years to go through the necessary review, dmifn. and comttruction processes The drougN hm mded with the lake levels increasing beyond normal levels Orono continued to take M active nde during 1991 in working to amend the proposed 25-year aimprehensivc plan for the Lake kftmekmka Consnrvaiion District (LMCD) Because Orono has 40% of the lakeshorc on Lake Mhmemnke. Iha plan could have a decided inqiaci on that portion of the community The City ncemidiilly eidist^ the supps>n of eight of the fourteen member communities in this effort to refocus im LMCD on its original miuRin of prsuecting the lake as important natural and recreaikmal rewntree. New housing otmaovetion declined significantly with only 12 new dwellings being constructed This wm due partly lo die wonomy and partly to the uncenaimy amcermng the selection of the Hi^way 12 eofrldCM'. The new htMising construction iiutlook is much impr**v*d f *r 1992. with 10 permits oTMayll. 1992 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Utniwi ^•V. V i ...-V’.--■‘ •T.i>i' *■ '.ft :.-Jr. I h- I iI?-r ■ 4: r ■.-. |;t Ifs^^ f ft % Iff; I li fe}!' - •I >■ ■ •■■ I i'n;. .. m^'■'a : 'A- i|S%: ■- I*- I & fc'|'i;lpt A I To thf City Council Mid Citizens of the City of OronoluMl. 1992 H m City’f third year in the recycling program retulted in a 23% diversion of tonnage from iandfilli, well Ami of th^ 16% mandate for 1992. with it participation rate well above S0%. TTfo City purchased property north of Highway 12 on Wd Crystal Bay Road for the new City facilities Hi pni$Gt includes a public works garage, City Council Chambers. Administrative Building, and i Mice Building. TiMra has bem widespread support in the community for new facilities for a number of years. After dfolrfoulkM of a uawsletter to inform ail residems about the need for and costs of the facilities, a public hantag was held in August of 1991 to receive public comments concerning the project. Approaimately 90 fiaiiaali aRtnded. Although there was nearly unanimous support for the facilities, there were COMOMM expresSid regarding the size and cost of the project. Based on the results of the public hearing. A m Cky Council decided to move ahead with the project. The fSKUhies project is being financed through a lease/purchase agreement with the City HRA. This affangemenf wu selected in order to expedite the project to take advantage of the favorable bond market. fheFlrii CoiBunitsion moved aheMi with initial efforts to implement a master plan for a community-wide blht/bike trail system. Tht City continued iu D.A.R.E program in the elementary schcxtls with the foil support and cooperation of the school district. He City initiated its own water system in the Highway 12 area which will eventually supplement a eaMract airaiigeiaeot from Long Lake plus provide for greater development in the Highway 12 corridor. The wtfl and pumphouse were complet<»l in 1991. The water tower is scheduled to be completed in 1992. He financial Infoumation Rt of die CHy is responsible for ^tablishing and maintaining a system of uuwnal control. Internal eccouiuing controls are designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute. Vivardi^ the safcfuardi^ of assets against loss from unauthorized use or dispositioo. and dw idUdMiily of fbuMCial raoortB for preparing financial statemems in conformity with generally accepted gPHIIlHAil prtnciplM and mainiiMng acccmntabiiity fw assets. Tnc concept (tf bcncfks Iftely to he iirteii, and dm autetion of ooets md benefits requires cstimaics and judgements by managsmint. All hMHil connol af^loationa occih ’ within this framework for the purpose of adcquatdy safofuarding aaaeis Ml providing raMondble aisurance in the jmiper recording of finwiciad transactiom. He City 1'^' ^etary ctmtrols to aid in compliance with the amiud budget as adopted by the City ______________^Jtary hnefratiun is employed as a management omirol device durtag the yeer for (Bt ChMnl Fund and %NKial Rev enue Fimds Budgetary comrol for Debt Service Funds Is achievad AB miB Bnnaral ohllgliion bond provisions BudgMary auurc^ for Capaal Frojcct Funds is accompifahed lilMglim m of pfojict controls c -'A j • ' J -i ;s 'ii iC "rjir * '’i ' • j;•X-t-' I|s ¥'5:S" 21- pm V. ^%<n fe-.. U’t ?‘-iv Npi.. ■'hf'.. rSi ill' V:v III m&.«€' 'i To flNi City Council and Citizens of the City of Orono ItlM 1, 1992 ■^P^l^ary eofllrol it mainuinad at the department level through the issuance of purchase orders. Bapeaditures are monitored during the year, and any recommended adjustmems to the budget are preiented to the Council for approval by City management. Unused appropriations lapse at year-end; however, the Council may approve carryover of specific items. The financial ttatemwits ami schedules included in the Financial Section of this report reflect the City's continued adierencc to sound financial management. GBtElUL GOVniNMlMT FtmCTIONS IIm fbllowil^ ichedule presents a summary of General Fund. Special Revenue Funds, and Debt Service Funds revenue for the year eroded Decem^r 31, 1991, and the amount and percentage of increases or decreases in reltfion to the prior year revenue. Revenue Amount Percent of Total Increase (Decrease) From 1990 Percent of lncrea.se (Decrease) Taxee Licenses and permits Imergoveminemal Charges for services Fines Special assessments Interest Other revenue 1.682.260 81.202 178.901 726.118 72.728 139,008 324.180 41.631 51 m% 2 50 5 51 22 37 2 24 4 30 10.00 1.28 44.617 (55.350) 43,389 (32.251) (35.503) (31.490) (38,913) (62.224) 2 72 % (4053) 32 02 (4.25) (32.80) (18.47) (10.72) (59 91) 100.00 % S (167.725)(4.9I)% Tteies are the largM source of revenue, con^rising S! .80% Licenses and permits revenue continued 10 dedine in 1991 as the oonuruction slowdown continued; however, early indications for 1992 reflect an upturn. The increase in intergovernmental revenue is due to increased State aid for street maintenance Mi increased County aid for the recyciing/cleanup program The chiuges for services revenue deoeased due ID i reduction in applications for variances, subdivisions, cemdition use. and plan/site exam fees, all lUlMad to foe penaral decline in the building/construction area. Fines revenue declfoed fonher than mtpecMd due to the Court’s general use of conuminny savice in lieu of fines for cottia offonses. In ru^KMUM to the comiiwing traid of deermning fines revemie. the City rebid iu contract for prosecution lervicn In 1991. The result wUI be a signifleam reduction in prosecution costs for 1992. The decrease hi mieiimini revenue is a aanirai progression since no new signifleam assessments wwt levied hi 1991. The bMr«M rcvmiue deernse reflects the decrease in earnings rams fftmi 1990 %o 1991. The ofoer revemii decreiae is mostly a resuh of die (focline in pmk tfodication fees from 1990 lo 1991, which tff tM 10 fubdIvakMii «id cthw land use applicaitom The foNowfog tchedidt preients a summary of General Fund. Special Revenue Funds, and Debt Service thuds iipeiidilufei for the year ended Decembm’ 31. 1991. and the amoum and percemagt of mcreaam or dKTMMi in rOlalion to the prior yem expenditures For purposes of this analysis, ctutmu and capital OUlUqf art combined by function C I- II I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I - aik. -.r - ■ hI •\ I I I I I I I I ‘ i ' D.-v^V..' I ft. !■ I^rC tr ijfe-ftft •r I S|,. I ^u!r ■ - imk:IC m I ,'ir.;•' V if|*f To tbt City Council and Citizens of the City of Oronc June 1, 19M £sj•iiUMil i.es Currant «id capital outlay Oaneral fovernment PuMic Mfety Streets Parks and recreation Miscellaneous Debt service Principal Interest and fiscal charges Other Amount Percent of Total Increase (Decrease) From 1990 Percent of Increme (Decreme) $ 652.252 19.78%$ (43.751)(6.29)% 1,510,955 45.82 (15,899)(1.04) 507.665 15.40 (60,610)(10.67) 56.740 1.72 7,821 15 99 163,494 4%14,702 9 88 300.000 9 10 • 104.253 3 16 (20.171)(16.21) 2.013 006 44 2.23 S 3.297.372 100.00%$ (117.864)(3.45)% Hm decrease in Omerai Government expenditures is a result of declines in legal costs of $46,975. in liifUnn ooels of $10.tl6due to 1991 being a nonelection year, and in capital outlay of $12,680. These dtfftifft were offset by increases in Uui Council of $6,401 for membership increases in local organiaalioM, the Administration Department increases of $5 036 for scheduled salary adjustments, and tfM Finance Department increases of $12,017 for scheduled salary adjustments and the reevaluation of dw Atsistaat Finance Director position. Hm dtiTtiff in hddic Safety expenditures were a result of capital outlay decreases in the amouni of $104,965 beinf ofV^ by scheduled personal slices cost incremes in die Police Department of St.019; dm peffOMi services cMt Increeses in the Inspection and Zoning Department of $36.3^3 (includti^ the iididon of a (Ull*time . ^ic impector); the increase ^24,161 in fire service comrKt costs ($13,651 In dm L4dte service area and $8,762 in the Mound service area); and the Pi>iice Department increiM in services of $13,525. most of which was for the search process for hiring a iw w Police Chief t^on dm retirement of the previous chief. Hm Streets expenditures for capital outlay decreased $63,540 for 1991 and the personal servico costs wen down $8,161. TImse decreases were offset by increased use of rental etpiipm^ for maintmujice Of 112.469. Ml expenditures increased for cipital cnitlay by $10,215 due to the (wrehase of a raptarameM trador/mower $1m Miifel*i~ienui expenditures had a net increase of $14,702, comprised as fMfowt; a^ inemse of $4i,l0l In dm iacycling D^mitmait. an increase of $14,811 in the coniii^cficy. a darrame of $7,125 MdmUpKiii Mivicra for coiwdttnf and police, and a decreme of $42,014 in the buildMf profram. The Umranw In dm Recydtai Depanammi ti for contracted collection/dispi.Hal costs in ^ emouei ^$15,205; of sprim/fdl cleeciup profram contract ct>sa. and the yard wame program coats of 118.891; nee of Chy pgsowwl ftn* diese programs m die nok^uoi of $12,055. The buttdti^ praprani rntpeadilnrai hegiwiing in 1991 were funded through a CapUai Pruj«:t Fund The decrease in dhhl fv ici prtecipei and inieram reflects the schedhiled debt payments A mn_A ■‘S* ■r i „J». # -Jg.fv „,.:pf ... > m m pr»i; fjf:m<: t lti.i/i> EV-life-#'*: lifts ’Wm^r -vAi'^ •* •» ixm te:-?i‘ ^-,t iiiiS.iv’--* iti:" 1%., r:iSli"* p *fr: ■'■' if:! $-!C^V.;. ®ir ttSr-;' To Iho City Council and Citizens of the City of Oronohmi, mi f''UND Balances lAL Fund Hm uadatifnalad ftind balance of the General Fund increased from $785,701 at December 31, 1990, to SS19.932 ai Deconber 31, 1991, or 4.4%. The 1991 ending undesignaled fund balance provides 27% covyafe of the 1992 adopted budget of $3,024,890 lAL R evenue funds Special Riveiiiii Funds are used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are legally f iriclid to eipmdituret for specific purposes, including current operating expenses and capital outlay. Fabk fund The Park Fund was created by Ordinance ot the City Council to receive contributions for aobdiviaiont in lieu of conveyance or dedication of land for parks, playgrounds, and other public purpoeet. Such contributions, termed park dedication fees, are to be used for the acquisition, devilopinent. or maintenance of public parks, playground.s, surface water holding areas (ponding areas), and debt retirement in connection with land previously acquired for such public purposes, tlif itod balance as of December 31. 1991 was $236,659. IMPDOVEMENT AND EQUIPhfENI OUTLAY FUND The lnproveni«M and Equipment (Outlay Fund was established to provide a source of funds for eqelpmeni purdiases and improvements The fund was established by a transfer from the General Fimu I and la maintained by annual budgeted transfers from the General Fund, by investment lerainfi, and by user charges to participating departments for certain office equipment. l^ipendiDircs are for non-Enterprise Fund purposes The fund balance as of December 31. 1991 was 1253,131. Buijnng C apital Outlay Fund The Buikting Capital Outlay Fund was established to receive annual budgeted transfers from the Otnml Fuad for the purpose of reducing the need for future bonding of non'Emerprise building fhcHitto. During 1991, the fintd payment of bonds and imcrest was made in the 1966-76 Improvemmt Bonds and die residual equity of $349,353 was transferred to the Building Capital Outlay Fund. The 1991 FUMic Facilkiea Capkal Project Fund received advmces from the Building Cigiital Ouday ^lad of 1215,619 fot Und acquisition. constructKin. and profeuioad aervkas ooMi Incnnad prior to the sale of the 1991 f^ic Facilities Revenue Bo^ The advances wUl be fipaid froDl bond proceeds The City Council has determined that investmwu eandags of the Bnllding Capihd oiniay Fund will be used to a degree to pay the debt service of the 1991 PuMk Facditjni Rtvmue Boiids The Building Capital Outlay Fund balance at December 31. 1991 was t2;64l.ll5. 1 —---■ * Pi 'hW...''■I 'ii /■ Ir^'f iSiS?;" 1 I I^>r p-:-^ ''|j^ Ir i. .-" I 'AFiiyr; IrM i .:>. I•i'' i-- # ■M' I'i * I •!.■ ■ FSa& tip tht City Council and Citizens of the City of OronoluM 1. 1992 rr ScBvicE Ftmos DtbC Sfrvice Funds are used to account for the current year payment of matured principal and interest on kMf-cemi general obligation debt. Sources available for payment of the debt service are provided by apadal aaaauinaitt and general obligation property taxes. Daring 1991, the City issued $4,000,000 in Public Facilities Revenue Bonds through the Housing and Radevelopnient AuOiority (HRA) for the purpose of constructing a City Hall. City offices, police fidlitiei, and Public Works office maintenance and storage buildings. The btmds are sr.cial obligations of the Cky as iaiuer and owner of the land and City Hall during the terms of the bond*. As security for iM bonds, the City htt pledged to make rental payments equal to the annual debt servic.*. The City plans to aMually appropriate City funds available for this purpose. In addition, the City may make a special levy (outside of levy limits) to pay principal and interest on the Housing and Redevelopment AutlKirity bonds as the State has determined that the HRA is a political subdivision and under Suue law a special levy to pay principal and interest on bonds of another political subdivision is allowed A debt service reserve was established from the bond proceeds in the amount of $400,000 to be used only to pay principal and interest on the bonds if current revenue (lease payments) should prove inadequate. The combined fund balance for all Debt Service Funds as of December 31. 1991 was $1,217,247. which represents a decrease of $67,693 from 1990. which includes the transfer of $349,353 from the I966-76 Improvement Bonds Fund to the Building Capital Outlay Fund C ahtal Fkqiect Funds Capital Project Funds are used to at traction of major capital facilities*-*j I ‘ I Municipal State «aid con ^uition Fi;nd The Municipal State-Aid Construction Fund is used to account for State-aid construction revenue and the use of that revenue for improvements to thoroughfare roads within the City. The <^cit hind balance as of December 31. 1991 was $402 PtKMANENT IkOIMIVEMCNT REVOLVING FUND The Permanent Improvonent Revolving Fund provides finding for a>nstructk>n costs prior to obtaining pmman^ financing or levying of assessntents against benefitted properties for those projects hinded directly. Within this fund there is also an account for majirf' road and bridge repairs, oonstraetton. or maintenance The undesignaied fond balance as of Decembtf 31. 1991 was $21.$76, a deerMse of $106,903 fmm 1990 The 19$$ Street and Storm Sew« improvement omts are to be fonded from dedicned Municipal StiUe-Aid Fund revenue of nM,000 V)d from Oeneril Fund revenue of approximately $210,000 to be paid ovm tmt yc»s At the mid of 1991, $10,000 of Municipal Stme-Aid has not been received The General Fund made no installment in 1991 7. .......... 4 i I % 4 1 3® itev f-'‘ ;-Agffev :,V •%' ‘ - ■ S*?%- ^5f. iiS- % A> m^' Jp-r.: J^ft- fegii-"- To the Chy Council uid Citizens of the City of Orono luMl. 1992 1991 PliBuc Facilities Fund During 1991, the 1991 Public Facilities Fund was created to account for the bond proceeds of 13,950,000 from the 1991 Public Facilities Revenue Bonds and the costs of land acquisition and oominictioo of the 1991 public facilities project consisting of a City meeting hall. City offices, police offlcit, and detention/processing. Public Works offices, storage, maintenance and repair of machinery and equipment space, and a cold storage building. Prior to the sale of bonds, dated De ce mber 1, 1991, ^ Building capital Outlay Fund advanced S2S5.6S9 fur varmus cusis incurred for the project. These advances are to be repaid to the Building Capital Outlay Fund from die bond proceeds. The fond balance designated for construction was $3,114,445 at DecMbbmSl, 1991. ftflWltte PtlNDS EMerpriae Funds are used to account for financial resources used in providing self-supporting public lervi ^ in which most of die costs involved are paid in the form of charges by the users of the services. BlCipt for ownership. Enterprise Funds bear z close resemblance to privately owned utility or s«vice emeipriaes. Hm City owns and operates a water utility, sewer utility, and a public golf course WAtW OPERATING fund The Wm Operating Fund accounts for the provision o vater services to the residents of the City who have wmer service available All activities necessary to provide such services are •ccounled for in this fond, including administration, operations, maintenance, billing, and coilacfion. The summary of operatiom for 1991 and 1990 is as follows December 31 1991 1990 Op^atii^ revenue Opmiing expenses S 2 S 161.565 Operating toss t (43.760 1 I (40.503 ) OpiTMii^ kMi for 1991 does not Include nonoperating reveiuie tyf $77,691 or nmoperatii^ eepamai of 177,013. Operming lr»s for 1990 does not include nemopenKing revalue of IND,503 or nonoperating eipenso of $76,299 Reuined earnings as of December 31. 1991 were $143,491, whidi lepreseiM • decrease of $9,753 from 1990, net of the e ffects of deprecia tion on omtrRiuted assets and of nonoperaing Hems i-f- S / t arik--I ii#r"I'"' R'.Vrh Im:m-;^m> B m kk'.f^:r Im !#■ I I . ■ Ikh. I > ' <ir.y k ■ k"I » ■ ■ :•> Ttt IN Cky Council and Chliens of the City of Orono r«ne 1. 1992 Scweh OrauTiNG Fund TN Stwtr Operating Fund accounts for the provision of sewer services to the residents of the City who have sanitary aewer ser. ' 'e available All activities necessary to provide such services art for in this (iind. includi.'f iidministration. operations, maintenance, billing, and collection. IN aununary of operations for 1991 and 1990 is as follows: D^ember 31 1921 1990 Operating revenue Operating expenses $ 446,776 $ 423,592 475J 09 438.066 Operating loss S (28.331 ) S (14.474) Opanting losi for 1991 docs not include nomjperating revenue of $166,233 or nonoperating expenses of $74,710 Operating loss for 1990 does not include nonoperating revenue of $160,406 or nonoperating expenses of $72,777. Retained earnings as of December 31, 1991 w«t $1,503,992, which represents an increase of $190,454 from 1990. net of the effects of dcpraciation on contributed assets and of norniperating items. Gotr C ourse Oterating Fund TN Golf Course Opiating Fund accounts for the operation of the City-<mned and operated golf course sales and expemes necessary to provide this service TN summary of opcratioiw for 1991 and l*i>X} is as tolUiwi December 31 Gross profh and (gating revimue Operating expenses Opting 1991 1990 $ 131,432 %135,109 107.973 imii i .UJS2 } Opertfing for 1991 do« not include nonoperating revalue of $2,942 or nonopeoateg aapeaati nf |T?f Operating income for 1990 tk>es not Include nonoperating revenue of $1,026 ionings m of Decemba 31. 1991 were $101,547. which represenu an increaie of S25,l$7 Oom 1990. iwi of tN effects of depreciaiiofl on contribuied aaaos and of nonoperating Reott itaSSli"■ipP;::. ................. 4 A ■ k k %■ ii <uuiitiiSdiki;b jfik. (ie #\- Pf"' K# - < ?l r To lh« City Council and Citizens of the City of OronoIwif I. 1992 DEBT ADMINISTRATION At Docombtr 31,1991, the City had five bond issues outstanding. The City’s legal debt limitation, based OB State StitutM, equals 2% of market value All City bonded debt at December 31. 1991 is special mumfnt or nvenue Ainded and therefore is excluded from the limit. The City bond rating from MocMfy's InvcHors Service it Aal for all bond issues except the 1991 Public Facilities Revenue Bond whidi hai a bond rating from Moody's Investors Service of Aa CASH MANAGEMENT Cub leniporarily idle during the year was invested in demand d^)sits. certiticaies of deposit, money Market handi, obligations of federal agencies, the U.S Treasury, the Sute of Minnesota, repurchase BmeMl, bankers* acceptances, and commercial paper. The City’s investment objective as stated in InveitiTifnt policy to firM ensure the preservation of capital in the overall poitfolio. second to MaxiMbe yield while matching maturity dates with expenditure needs, and third to diversify the invMttnein portfolio by financial institution, government agency, or by the corporation in the case of cOMMcrcial paper to reduce the exposure to risk of loss. At December 31. 1991, the City had an investment portfidio of $11.266.615. at cost, divetsified as shown in the following table Type of Investment Certificates of Deposit Commercial Paper U S Federal Agencies U S Treeaury Obligations Stale of Minnesota Mtmey Market Funds Cost Percent $ 575.000 5 10% 1.3-54.948 12 03 3.754.066 33 32 1.168.371 10.37 450.000 399 3.964.230 35.19 100 00% Por A# «ided December 31. 1991. the City had investment interest earnings of $510,160. or tm average yield of 7 94% vii RISK MANAGEM^ The Chy pwikipato in the liability, propwty. tmd workers ’ compensation (wogrwns ipomored by Me LaafN of MI mmmM Chtes Insurance Trust In addition, the City appoints an agwM of record to atoixi wMi Me iMniniltfMio n, loss preventHin. and risk management II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •w i. >• ..V ^-r-; ^. ■ '•V ■- 6 4 • • »y i^1 P-A. '"'VI ■tl '■ ■ :< .#■ f ■*-i '-.as; 0A 0!‘^* ^4 :v^': sts-;**P f!‘ - I. 'Issjv' ■ : , y^- ""Wk:'‘^0 mm / if |^' r: ■'W • : • ^ Jiv-J- f T» iM> Cky CbMnctl Md CitUcfns of the City of On no iMMi. \m OTHER INFORMATION nr audit MlMMiOli State Sututcs require th« the City have an annual audit performed hy a certified public •ecoiMRMi or iIm State Auditor. Hie City appointed the certified public accounting firm of Malloy. EtfWiwAl, Radotavich A Co., P.A., to perform the Midit for the year ended December 31. 1991. The Aoditor'i Repon on the general purpose financial statements and combining and individual is Included in the Financial Section of this report. AWA tr.e Oovemment Finance Offlcen’ Association (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achieveineni for Bnerisnet In Financial Repotting to the City for its Comprehensive Annual Financial Repon for the ftffin ended Ptcembe*' 31. 1990 This was the fourth consecutive year that the City received this pMlifious award. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, the City published an easily tetdlMe M kI efflcicntly orgutized Comprehensive Annual Financial Report This report satisfied both fUMrAly accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements A Cert^aNi of Adlievement b valid for a period of one year only We beliese that our current Conprehenlve Annual Financial Report continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program*s TTpinnmitT and we are submitting it to the GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certifkaie. ws We would like to express our ipprecialion to the entire City staff for their Individual contributions tai Mbtii^ wkh the preparation of thb report and to the outside agencies who assisted with essential InforMtion for Ihb npon. We also would like to express appreciation to the Mayor and City CPnnrilwiiTibin for their intermt and support in planning and conducting the financed operatwns of the City. Slimrcly Ronald l.4H(u>rsa Adinintiiriii K i$ & '■lfeS' KlMitB FhHReeDIret^ ■m. .j 1'Ii4 0 ’I m • ■m ■4 -4 m 4 I 3 'I I iw I f ! 1 1 ■f rm--I . I !> J ■ I k'-t k,:' I m ■ «ib-, ir-I S' -■ I'I ‘■1I I ft'-I t I I ^;''V. 1 CITY OF ORONO ORGANIZATIONAL CHART PUBLIC MAY( COUl DR A NCIL ADVISORY COMMISSIONS LEGAL ... PLANNN4G PARK pwumcM PUWJCSAFiTY pueucwofms ftOIW* JSMAMT MMKtlfr fTOMNCf WATWftSCWIQOkPoomsi COMMUNTTV OiViUOr. 1 I I T,r: C.I ^5f“ 'I ■) '^H'.k;i^<4.,:.■'■ ■ :'^''’’^L.,S:.-*.-. • r ‘- - ^.4 '\. .I V t?*’- f I ••v‘. ■ I fc- TK rI rv: I II f ■I !V r . ^'’V I 'i. . : i:I 1‘<T' I I -EW ■ >■ ' U^ i.' t‘- i ‘t- W' .•i'. ~ .■“' fli0If' •V - ■:. ■ mfm.r, . ■ fgH '-- '"i> m..^- W "" ■"'A i.i V**;'' ®sIf CITY OF ORONOHENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA City Council and Other Officials Year Ended December 31. 1991 Term of Office From City Council Mayor Councilmembers Barban A. Peterson 1/01/91 12/31/92 J. Diann Goenen 1/01/91 12/31/94 Gabriel Jabbour Edward Callahan Mary C. Butler 1/01/91 12/31/94 1/01/89 12/31/92 2/11/91 12/31/92 City Administrator Finance Director • Treasurer Ronald J. Moorse rhomas M Kuehn Cityaerk Doro'hy M Hallin ; : .,:;W -13- ••iix ■ ii if s 1 a I'rVr. ■ ff I I I I I f ■■-■V ■■ri”.v, MfSkI I I txr--- I ■ ■t 1 .I t, ,t: ;,* I ‘.i1 I I f 11If. i ' >•-“ »■ life. ;V 1. mm-i Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Presented to City of Orono, Minnesota For its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Rscal Year Ended December 31, 1990 A Certificate of Achtewment for Excellence in Financial Reporting is presented by the Government Finance Officer? AsK>ciation of the United States and Canada to government units arxi puUic employee retirement ^ifstems whose comprehensive annual financial reports (CAFRs) achieve the highest standards in government accounting arid financial reporting mm President ' e e • ^ A Executive Director -14- ;; >-J I.'.- .r.ci. t -r-iu . i 1 i < ’'ii A. I p- S’Si ^'K. -'i; %-i'.^w( b IW'Vr:-I Ill M<?Pf«NCIf¥kLS >««CTM w. mmjjov, cm tMOMM A. KAANOMM, OfM muL A AAOoaivioH. cm ;s REPORT City Council and Residents City of Orono Orono, Minnesota Wt have audited the general purpose financial statements of the City of Orono. Minnesota, as of and for tN year ended December 31. 1991, as listed in the table of contents These general purpose financial •UMOienta are the responsibility of the City ’s management Our responsibility is to express an opinion <M these general purpose financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the general purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test hasia, fvIdeiKe supporting the amounts and disclosures in the general purpose financial statements. An mkUI also inclutto assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by mHiagement. as well as evaluating the overall general purpose financial statement presentation. We brieve that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion Ia our opinion, the general purpose financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material rwpects, dw financial position of the City of Orono at Deconber 31. 1991. and ^e results of its opvaiioftt, changes in fiind balance, and ca^ flows of the Proprietary Fund Type for the year dien ended ia conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the general purpose financial statcmcms t^MU as a whole. The combining and indivkhial fond and firumcial schedules as listed in the table of cooMlB are presented for purpose of additkmai analysis and ve not a required part of die general putpoie fimmcial statements. Such infomunion has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in our audh of the general purpose financial statements and. in our opinion, is fairly stated in all nuneri^ reflects In r^ation to the general purpose financial statemems taken as a whole (CtHKjfHMd} 15- ■■•i 1 0--m% m-h- - fi mm- i'.”, :»T.;iff: ' *V« 11;;::^bm- ! r. i .. - ip-' eU -:rV %-i ^ . - i‘'.w ^'Wh-r\m:g \e^. v^::-; mif--il» mm ■ Mmm '■»#ws t:' Tb« ttatistical infbrmatlon as listed in the table of contents is not necessary for a fair presenution of the ffiieill purpose financial statements, but is presented as additional analytical data. This information is unaudit^ arid we do not express an opinion on it. June 1.1992 vvllpi> ■ k»p • \r*•« A ■-: 'y 41% iifiiiliiftiililii u. .. -y- M 'SfS.£fW'•; /* v; tk ^ ■ . '"I '-<::A^ mm- ■ {m-^- f: if-' |- p*;mm ®fr' lik P?-mj. -r:,-'-;.,- Ifjir..-iPfe'-'-Vr's! IP'#'Isfif#.p:-v' *F- Eiv Ifc(»i cm.. CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOFA Combined Balance Sheet All Fund Types and Account Groups As of December 31.1991 (with Comparative Totals as of December 31,1990) Asaeis and Other Debits Anets CMi and temporary investments RKgiv iMff Accounts Accnied inicreat Daliaqueal taxes Delin^umt special aaiessments Deferr ' tnecial asmisnents Cor' . oeed DuefftmotlM’liinili AthwoH to other funds Dae fioai other lovemmeniat units flipaidh Dawned Items charges DIaeoaal on reveuue bonds CMweads Aiaif held by tkierred compensation plan trustees Wawlned aewti GMh and invcetmenls Accused inicrest fboperty, phut, and equipment - net dabte Amount nvaitable In Debt Service Bmds Omani RhmI for vetted vacation Aamam to he provided for debt service Toinlaanls and other debits ill wtii IP flnmrial niairinf ms ■mm 17- Governmental Ftind IVpes General Special Revenue Debt Service Capital Project $ 995.460 $ 2,737,287 S 776,767 S 4.199378 7.281 .^760 86,087 94.825 40.061 37,754 83.492 2,860 — —-24,866 1374 —-288.945 81347 30,027 - -— 12,191 14.912 27.695 4,484 56.900 285,689 -- 39320 —1324 834 —-—— 2.903 -— 32.179 -- —- 5.833 --- ———-- —-400.000 -•-- -•-- —— —— S 1351.673 S .V.VI.47<% 1362318 t 025 J7| IPI'■'I I I I I I 1 I I 1 ■■mI I I I I I Iti: I I I aUUi Jihhf Wr';I I K-if-i -i- ■■V*- I ^ ij'W |P’’ 'W ' £ ■ I ;-5". ^V-V ■ L..Wlfc Pta|irietary AMKliype Pit*—r*4— Fiduciary RittdTVpc SfieoSUe Thun and A Acoouni Groups Oeoefai Lonf-Tcnn Debt General Fixed Assets I U.18,635 $- $$ \95JS9 27J62 17.073 166.943 3.797 364,150 4.592 137 15.616 345,199 1,49939 2531 6.410,132 1,731.086 1,21737 106,017 332,753 Exhibit A-1 Totals (Memorandum Only) 1991 1990 $ 9.847.727 S 6.322.957 208.300 285,989 86,352 43313 537,735 30,027 63.079 342,589 405.628 4392 3,040 32.179 15.616 5.833 345,199 250.483 194.028 71,166 43.766 691.843 34313 53,647 76,932 461.800 11,918 61,740 37,416 16,317 4,406 297.761 1.899,269 15.221 8.14U18 1,742,120 23.30 7.918.514 1117347 1184.940 106,017 W2J53 120327 11.5j0t u I. I.;s w.iw t >moi7 LLgLos* I (coitfitued) • .8* iJaliiiift 1) 4 1 ■; 't -ii •5 L.’ rv •, S'" II §\i\‘ ip-il>'' tyi p®>2 :’:"■ Vj:!»;! ' >:^ ‘ iii:'- '■ ii ■■ ti^'life, CriY OF ORONO, MINNESOFA Combined Balance Sheet (continued) All Fund Types and Account Groups As of December 31.1991 (with Comparative Totals as of December 31,1990) Liabilities, Equity, and Other Credits ItAllhU* Aooowits nd cootncts payable Adcniad vacatioa and severance benefits Aocraed alaries payable Due toother funds AiMmoes from other funds Due to other governmental units Dufamdemiits Deferred revenue Defened compensation payable to emplo>c*cs liabiUUes related to reacted assets Aocraed hMeresi payable Aooounts and oonbacts payable Defened developer advances Laeg twmdebt Total liabilitks Equity and other credits invealmea ki general fined assets Ooahibuted tuptial Retained aaraiags Reaemd for debt service wPidcrv^j ASKlhllliAOt Peeervad for prepaid items Reaerved for advances to other funds Uvnerved Dmigualed for roedtrk%c projects Dtsigneled for emergency oonlinfrocies Clirigiilid coMtfiictioa DmigMlBd for capital oi^y Da^Mled for debt Mfvice De^gMledfor VBcatioa.^evefance benefits VnikiigirTri* tblni equity and t^her oedas Tbtal lididitiet, equity, and otiier credits IdRsm lifepiRarm fora ^mtm mOmm w IIMIIGmM IlMCfnkrnul ^ - V ■ Governmental Fund Types General Special Revenue Debt Service Cipiial fopject $ 102,125 $ 478 S 905 $ 184,117 ——-— 38,894 ——- 48.240 —-- ———342.589 63.14^—--- ———— in.5i9 -.^44.%66 87.705 ———— ——— ---- —-- - >-—* ■ 365.921 478 .U^.271 614.41! ———— ———... ---- 2.903 «• 56,900 285.689 -- 159,917 •--415.222 •--3.114,445 —2,852:^06 —- -•1.217.247 - 106*017 --- gi9.m -21.876 ^752 1.217.247 1.71 1,«0 $ 1.351.673 1 1J^2^18 S A325J71 II I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I ••• ^te" - VI I ■ lll‘^.^^111^ I 'h- 1^I f;'<te f.I ISIi,i If iT :T I r mi ••'Xrf., T •". ..'"W I I IfMl fr I fe#- I I- -1 ^ 7r.'. Vnfukimy AnllVpe Er**Tpyitc 10.726 25397 5.653 14339 7,799 140.600 61,060 15377 S9300 2300.000 5.44^>,S45 2033S5 1352.705 “Tl4p35 Fiduciary RmdTVw Aoownl Gro ups Expoidabk 11^ and Agncy General Lmi(-Tenn Debt General Fixed Assets - $S 345,199 5306,017 345,199 5306.017 1.731.086 1,731,^ Exhibit A-1 Totals (Memor andum On ly) 1991 1990 - s 298351 25397 44,547 63.079 342.589 70,942 140.600 ^45,590 345.199 s 77.428 13.877 40.1% 53.647 76.932 38,737 150,130 651.468 297.761 61,060 15.377 89,800 7306.017 9.548.54f 61,063 102,525 89.800 3.820,527 5;474.09i 1.731.086 5.440.845 i.544.711 5.606.471 203.28' 1.5'2.70' 322354 1.226.878 2,903 .342.589 55.918 76.932 159.917 415322 3.114.445 2352.306 1.217347 106.017 841^ 147335 384357 2.654.090 1384.940 120327 914,^ 143393W % 9mm UMEii U2in^ •20* Hm § # p wft' :•p^' ir &fe': !:^' i': r’^fPs,s5;.f- It i=^v |:i ■ % ft- . Ill W^" K;,'■;!>■ F» r‘5^f- % 4f& . CTIY OF ORONO, MIWIESOTA ComtNDed Stalonent of Revenue, Expendituies, and Changes in Fund Balance All Governmental Fund Types and Fjtpendabk Trust Fund Year Endbd December 31,1991 (with Cbmpaniiive Totals for Year Ended December 31 ,1990) Revesue ftapcity tales darfM for KTv ices Other revenue taNnaA earned on investments Shb or mt of property Miaorilaneoiis Total revenue ripfitihOTi Chmnt Qtaaral fovenment IhibUc adciy, excludes capital outlay Sttacts Re cyclim Mieoadaoeous QpM outlay Dabtanvioe Total expenthiuics Excm (deficiency) of revenue over expemhainrs (tnes) Operathif tnuMfenin Ojpemtii^l transfert (out) Itet other fmaiKim nmes (tnes) f jiona (thficiini'y) of rrvenue and other fuMndaf amruM over expmditurr« aad exher flaandne unes ftatduidai|tttty traaifm to (oto) iidofyw ttto mam lo ftoMcial mmerntmi %: 652,105 1 .508,485 474,350 44.791 79,714 83.780 1,65 1 2.844.878 (95.266) 102.690 (W.75C5 4K94d (55.126) 1.059.078 Governmental Fund Types Special Debt Capital General Revenue Service Project $ 1.620.232 $$ 62.028 $ 5%—138,412 27,979 81.202 —-- 178,876 -25 32,098 726,118 •-- 72,728 ——— 43,897 209,882 70.401 61384 9,686 .115 -- 16,277 12,50.1 2330 486 2.749.612 222:720 273.696 1H147 1.734 44.494 '46,228 406,266 406^266 621358 6113^8 176.492 (132370) (499.711) 414,230 3350,000 60,750 1102,690^ 4i4j5?r ~T 134352 281 3350.289 2.654.090 1J84.M0 ■M9353 069353) 661.171 y 1 3337395 I U17J47 t 3L71L46Q 21 II I I I a I I I tj I I I I I I I I I I I li"B¥i!¥-■'te ■im^m-:A' fe '■■>:v.'. Iw i-jfefe-Ite BR’ I t ■W/r •■'I ;''■■■ .irM:. ifii"h< R p. F’O. ;...- |:i- .■X': lii’*WiiMi|it^li ip^I e#^.:X PV:*||ff K, i iX, '-VB- ;; •■■Ii''■■ -••-• 1? ■ip ' ■ mvR '■■•'«■ ■■■ ■* • |iS., myriwy IhMinNd 53,S91 10IT 5331 ICTT ExhibilA>2 Totals (ManorandumOiily) 1991 1990 S 1^2^ 166.967 6132 210.999 726.118 72,728 $ 1,637,670 200,600 136,552 136328 75839 108331 383,764 10.021 85.487 ^.451,366 418.94.3 15,966 89,801 3302.460 652,105 1308.485 474350 44,791 79,714 138.905 668305 406366Wmr 68.3,176 1.419.419 471.420 48,129 31.61.3 75,165 284,066 42639.3 3,4.39.401 (551,055) 63.059 3.964330 163,440 (163!440>-fmjm 88.700 (88,700) 3.413,175 63 W 54393*9 5376..m um£i ■Ii 1 4 % ■4 m-" H;lli4m m :r I' riS |ii| r-y r- ft. I''- % Iff;' CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Combined Statement of Revenue, ExpendHtiffcs. and Changes in Fund Balance Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual General and Special Revem^ FutkIs Year Ended December 31.1991 Revenue Plopmy taiea Special aaseasroents lioensea and peimits Intergovernmental Charges for services Fines Other revenue Imcrcet earned on investments Sale or rent of property Miscellaneous Total revanie &pcmSturcs Current General government Public safety Streets Mu and recreation Recycling hfis^laneous Qipital outlay Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenue over expenditures Ofiicr finv Open ng sources (uses) igmafersin Opoitii^ msfen (out) Tend other finuKtng sowtxs (uses) Exoen (defickney) of revenue and odicr financing sources over expenditures and iithrr financing uses Pitfid balance Beginn iitg of yai Residual equity miufer in See I 'ff. otf year lo financial ttatoitcitti Is i :■ .V ■ .-v i 23 General Fund Budget Actual Over (Under) Bucket $ 1.657.240 $ 1.620.232 $ (37.008) —596 596 123,300 81,202 (2 098) 180,700 178.876 (1.824) 770,050 726.118 (43.932) 118.150 72,728 (45.422) 53.30t»43,897 (9,403) 9,7(i0 9,686 (14) 7,450 16,277 8,827 Z919,890 2,749,612 (170,278) 724,860 652,105 (72.755) 1,530.730 1,508,485 (22,245) 474,770 474,350 (420) 53,290 44,791 (8.499) 79,790 79.714 (76) 94,070 83.780 (10390) 2,950 1.653 2,960,460 2,844^8 dJ 5382) (40,570)(95.266)(4.696) 120,370 102,690 (17.680) (^,750)(60,750)- ' 59,6^41,940 . (! L.(53326)$ (72.37y 1.039.078 $ mj52-.-.nBarpTritaMwia. r. A I I I mI- r-A ,.>:-TTr*T'.'; W -' ■■'' .r , ^). I - -.^5»v:-r :®3 ...ft '|i#S Eihibit A-3 Special Revenue Funds Budget Actual Over (Under) Budget ;:pK VM .- - $- 3 209.870 300 gw 1,750 46,750 48,500 174370 60.750 (lowg. WJg) 209,882 335 12J03 12 35 (197) 222.720 (150) 1.734 44.494 (16) 0256) 46328 (2,272) 176,492 2,122 60,750 (102,690) (41,940) I 132.W 134352 S 2.1^ 2354390 349J53 S 3,137.995WH piiriiHii II #rii aiwTi A ; ■i: i i'ia V>^ r-'-- ■I-!• (‘H- i *' tr kit I:’m v; # *1 w rH-j ^ f.^;:v Ir'il ?- % S?;SliV' '^f-,' Pf rip" i;fe* hr Hi V S' i W" • #v M: iP* Exhibit A4OrrYOFORONO. MINNESOTA CcHTbined Statement of Reveniu, Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings Proprietary RmdType Years Ended December 31.1991 and 1990 Snietand cost of sales Tc^l operating revenue Total gross profit and operating revrtMie Opmtini expenses ftraml services Plvchased water Sewer tfisposal charges Ptofesslonal services O^entiim and maintenance supplies Hem, li^ and power Defnedation RmiI and equipment UdaMMOoe and repairs Admilialmtive and office expense Olter expenses Total operming expenses Operating loss Nonoperating revenue (expense) Interest can»d on investments, assets sold to other governmental units, interfund k^ans, and special assessments Amortiaition of deferred credits Qlliwuiqtense tmensi expense on interfwid loans and revenue bonds Lchs <n ale of assets Tolat nonoperating revanne (expense) Net irK'cnne Oudil for dqtraciatkio on contributed assets Incfwoe at retaiKd earnings Retained earnings B^inttingof year End of year See ecieB to financial natei i dii s imr h-M,..:, : ... •25- ' '-ri- I'hrik Enteiprise Funds 1991 1990 731,577 735360 240,522 34314 165,475 8333 18,34t 36,414 175,700 5,766 40328 56,140 2,759 783,994 (48,634) 137.336 9330 (3.986) (147,737) 94345 45.711 160347 >358 Sales $ 15,846 $ 17,801 Cost of sales 12,065 9,973 Ooss profit 3,783 7,828 Operating revenue Metered water sales 153,199 159389 User charges 3%378 401342 Greenlees 101,061 96,710 Equ^unent rental 24,090 28345 O^r 56349 26,452 712.458 720366 190,804 42,066 162372 7377 18332 37306 175..U7 6328 50365 48302 5360 742.W 3)C ■51^* 255,405 9330 (1.180) (147396) 115359 95.166 161,165 254351 1349,432 1395,101 > L54MI 2 II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' V ;. V • ‘ V vW-. w |v':^>-.- lli*m (1...' ■■"':WW - ■■fi ij. f?4- OTY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA 0>mbined Statement of Cash Flows Proprietary Fund Type Years Ended December 31.1991 and 1990 Oih flows from operating activities Operating loss Mijotaoem lo leoxicilc operating loss so net Guh provided by operating activities VacMion and severance benefits Depreciation Loss on sale of assets Amortiation of revenue bond disaiunt MWOCoarem value credit principal and deferred aedit Change in assets and liabilities (bicrease) deaease in Aoo^ts receivable Delinquent special assessments receivable Due bom other funds Due from other governmental units Inventory Prepaid items Increase (decreaM) in Aooounts payable Accounts payable-r^tricted Coniractt payable Contracts payable-restricted Salaries payable Due to other funds Due 10 other govcrtunemal units Net cash provided by operating activities Ooh flows flora capital and related financing activities Special asscssniaiu cdlected on revenue bond debt Aoquisflknor oontruction of capital assets MWee current value credit principal and deterred aedit IfWOCcumnt value credit interest iMerail paid on ret^xnic bonds Iwr dnrges on revenue bonds Na cash used by capital and related financing aatvitics Sec . I f 10 fhutfidal n^nems •26' Exhibit A^ Enterprise Funds S 1991 1990 (48,634) $(22,693) 11,520 2,761 175,700 175.347 798 — 701 613 (28.327) (27.604) 1.399 1,749 622 (1.922) 1.529 3,221 19.094 18355 7,326 6,467 5,685 9,551 1.553 626 (4.483)(12.981) 2.400 — (82,665)25,485 2,101 (114) 4,373 2,584 (1,739)(2,508) 68.953 178.937 61.951 50300 (218.404)(541.805) 28,327 27.604 15,192 15,916 (147,251)(128.844) (3,986)(1.180) (264.171)(577,809) (continued) j .1 I It ' ft" ■ '• -vto i&m%- BM■.'S’f'M: S r:-,:i: ’V:W. r: ■t#-: K ii Bbb ' MK- m- tBXB iffc • *f'-' £fm- ,.-i mix. . '■' •^ .• * CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA CcHubined Statement of Cash Flows (amtinued) Proprietary Fund Type Years Ended December 31.1991 and 1990 Gtth flows from investing activities Interest received on investments Net sales (purchases) of temporary investments Net cash provided (used) by investing aaivities Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Guh and cash equivalents Beginrung of year Bid of year Chsh and cash equivalents Other temporary investments Total cash and temporary investments OMdt and temporary investments Unrestricted Restricted Total cash and temporary invesmients Noncash operating items (golf course) Exhibit A-5 Enterprise Funds 1991 1990 163,925 (1,213,099) (1,049,174) 260,374 824388 1,084,762 (1,244.392) 685,890 2.059,810 1373,920 815,418 $ 2,059,810 815,418 1.822,486 2,059,810 609,387 $ 2,637,904 $ 2,669,197 $ 1,138,635 1,499369 927.077 1,742,120 $ 2,637,904 $ 2,669,197 During the year ended December 31. 1991. the City t'aded in equipment with an Mljusted book value S800. Equipment Original price Aocumuiated depredation AdHutfed book valuew Leas nada-in value r 3,994 23% 1,598 800 See L»s on sale ut equipment n to financial uatements 798 -27- ; I I J % ■ ^ ■ I I ^ -HI o I m I 'fr''Ni^ I I f: f w I #» I I, . CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements December 31. 1991 NOTTE I - SIGNinCANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES A. Organiiation Hm Chy opertte* under "Optional Plan A" form of government as defined in the State of Minnesota StHiitct. The City Council, composed of an elected mayor and four elected trustees or councilmembers. MerciMS legislative authority and determines all matters of policy The financial statements and the accounting policies of the City conform to generally accepted accounting principles as applicable to governmental units B. Baportliig Entity For financial reporting purposes the City’s financial statements include all funds, account groups, departments^ conunissions, and the HRA of Orono over which City officials exercise oversight responsibility. There are no other organizations that when considered would be included in the financial Oversight responsibility includes such aspects as appointment of governing body members, budg^ l^roval, approval of property tax levies, outstanding debt secured by the City’s full faith and credit or revenue, and responsibility for funding deficits C. Bnirit of Statement Presentation The accounts of the City are organized on the basis of funds and account groups, each of which is ooasidered a septate accounting entity The City maintains the following funds, grouped by fund type and account group: I) Govemmoital Fund Tyi t) G«icnil Fund - The General Fund is the general operating fund of the City. It is used to account for all fri-ncial resources excq)t those required to be accounted for in another fund. h) Spadat Revenue Funds - The Special Revenue Funds are used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources (other than expendable trusts or major capital projects) that are dmignated for specified purposes. c) Debt Service Funds • The Debt Service Funds are used to accou"* for the accumulaiioQ (rf resources for, and the payment of. general Uing-term deln prim., al, interest, and related costs. Capital Project Fundi - The Capita! Project Funds are used to Knnini fer financid resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of major capital factitties (other than those financed by Proprietary Funds i -28 fel: lyaMiii li i ■ ••' ^ 'yiX-m: r'.' f • - rlfS#' ;S;: ■'' PW, CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31. 1991 NOTE I - SIGNinCANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) 2) Proprietary Fund Type a) Enterprise Funds • The Enterprise Funds are used to account for operations that are financed and (grated in a manner similar to private business enterprises - where the intent of the governing body is that the costs of providing goods or services to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through user charges. 3) Fiduciary Fund Type a) Trust Fund - The Trust Fund is used to account for assets held by the City in a trustee capacity. b) Agency Funds > The Agency Funds are used to account for assets held by the City in the edacity of trustee or agent Agency Funds are custodial in nature (assets equal liabilities) and do not involve measurement of results of i perations 4) Account Groups a) General Fixed Assets - This account group contains the fixed assets acquired principally for genera) inirposes and excludes fixed assets of the Proprietary Funds. b) General Long-Term Debt • This account group contains the long-term obligations of the City other than those liabilities included in the Proprietary Funds. D. Basif of Accounting 1) Modified Accrual * The Governmental Fund Types and Trust and Agency Funds are accounted for using the modified accrual basis of accounting Generally, only current assets and current iiibilhica are included in th^e funds Governmental Funds use the ‘finucial flow” measurement focus. Consetpiemiy, their revenue is recognized when it becomes measurable and available as net current auets. Available means collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to be used to pay liabilities of the current period. Major revemie that is susceptible to accrual includes property taxes, special assessments, lattfgovernmental revalue, charges fur services, and interest earned on investmotts. Major revalue that is not susceptible to accrual includes licenses and permits, fees, tmd miscellaneous revenue. Such revenue is recorded only when received because it is not measurable until collected. Expenditures are recognized under the modified accrual basis of accounting when the ridated fond lU^ility is incurred, exc^ for principal and interest on genera) long-term debt which & rioognized when due 29 -i ' I ..A ■ ^ .c,.. r'-i* - - ■• ! :•■ IK' - T‘ CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTANotes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31. 1991 NOTE 1 • SlGNinCANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) 2) Accrual - The Proprietary Funds are accounted for using the “capital maintenance" measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. Their revenue is recognized when it is earned and expenses are r^ognized when they are incurred E. Cash and Inmtments rifti bilinfft from all ftinds are invested to the extent available in short-term investments Investments are stated at the lower of aggregate cost or market value Earnings on investments are allocated to the ladlvidual funds based upon the average of monthly beginning cash and investment balances. Assets of the deferred compensation plan are reported in the Agency Fund at market value F. Property Taxes Property tax levies are set up by the City Council prior to Decemb'*r 31 of each year, and are certified lo Heoaepin County for collection in the following year In Minne.' *a, ct»unties act as collection agents for all imiperty taxes. The County spreads all levies over taxable propery Such taxes become a hen on January 1 and are recorded as receivables by the City on that date. Revenue is accrued and recognized in the year coflectible. Taxes which remain unpaid at December 31 are classified as delinquent taxes receivable. Reveme from property taxes which is not collected within 60 days of year-end is deferred since it is not ivtfdble to meet obligations of the current year Reel property taxes may be paid by taxpayers in two equal installments on May 15 and October 15. Pmonal property taxes may be paid on February 28 and June 30. The County provides tax settlements to cities ^ree times a year. CRio in Minnesota operate under a levy hmiiatiun law which allows for an increa.se in the tax levy each yev aqual to the Implicit Price Deflator increase or 3%. whichever is greater, further indexed by the pemntage bmease in households or population, whichever is greater Levies for bonded indebtedness an not limited by dita law. For the year 1992, cities with populations over 2,500 will generally have ■0 taicrcase in the tax levy under the levy limit taw, exeqx for debt levies. G. Spedal AaMMnents $peciiM assMsments reproent the financing for public improvements paid for by broefitting property ownan These assessments arc recorded as receivables upon certification to the County The (iwiwpcmding revenue from the delinquent (unremitted) and deferred (certified but not yet levied) special ■IMUnenti recmvabic is deferred until the year in which n beevimes available (collected within 60 days ycar<ead). i^m'30 K' ■ vr’ & r ftf?:- i: I'i ■.. ^' ■ ;/ v' e;^v ^v. IV t:W m- m-^ , ‘A-> :V-5f '■'’i . . m-m:m P-'ir - V-‘ rv ' ^ -MM •Sifti , : #! '■ '. “SS 'fj.''; flar- . • .:> :V'!. ■ ■. •' -'v'tll- b»r- te' V#S: CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1991 NOTE 1 - SIGNinCANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUFn) H Invcniorica Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market on the first*in. first-out basts I. lUelri^cd Assets * Cash and Investments Certain proceeds from the General Fund Public Facilities Revenue Bonds and the Enterprise Fund Revenue Bonds are classified as restricted assets on the balance sheet because their use is limited by i^>plicahlc bond covenants. J. Property^ Plant, and Equipment Fixed assets are swed at cost, estimated historical cost, or in the case of contributions, at fair market value at the time received. I) General Fixed Assets Account Group • General fixed assets are not depreciated The costs of property, plant, and equipment are accounted for as current expenditures of the Governmental Fund Types in the year purchased. Infrastructure fixed assets - roads, bridges, curbs and flrtters, streets and sidew^ks, drainage systems, lighting systems, and r'milar assets - are not included in the City ’s accounting records. 2) Proprietary Fund Type - Fixed assets of the Proprietary Funds are depreciated using the ttraight-iine method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, as follows; Buildings Distribution colleciKin system Equipment 25 '■-0 years 10-75 years 3-20 vears Depreciation on contributed assets charged to operations is closed to contributed equity. K. Vacation and Sevrraftet Deneflis Payable (Compensated Absences) The liability fr» v«ted vac^ion and severance benefits is recorded in the General Long-Term Debt Account Grtaip and in the Enterprise Funds, as appropriate L. Muoi andum Only Columns Becaaie the accotmting system is organized and operated on a fund basis, the columns on the combined financki Stawmenti captioned. "Totals (Memorandum Onlyji.’' art presented for informational purposes only. They do not fairly present financial position or results o( <>perjUions for the CHy as a whole and are not Intended to represent ctmsolidMed inKrrmation 31 • ,V =‘’4 ■ IL feL.S|pfeI-'-' I4:",' i; I 1 I I , T. ' I % I* I I I i. Ikf'M w. ■! r..v.,I S' CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31. 1991 NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) M. CominnitiTC Data Comparative total data for the prior year has been presented In the accompanying financial statements In order to provide an understanding of changes in the City’s financial position and operations. However, oomparative data has not been presented in all statements because its inclusion would make certain atatements unduly complex and difficult to understand N. Smicment of Cash Flows Fot purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows, the Cii> considers all highly liquid debt instruments with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents The Pri)prielary Funds portion in the City wide cash and investment management pool is considered to be cash equivalents to the extent available. NOTE 2 - BUDGETS AND BUDGETARY ACCOUNTING The City follows these procedures in establishing the budgetary data reflected m the financial ststements: 1) The City Administrator submits to the City Council a proposed operating budget .or the fiscal year commencing on January I of the following year. The operating budget includes proposed expenditures and the means of financing the.m 2) At lemt one special Council meeting is conducted to obtain public comments as required by the State Truth in Taxation Law. 3) The budget is adopted by the City Council. The City has established budgetary control at the department level. City management requests Council approval when exceeding the budget aA that level. The City Code requires the City Administrator to make recommendations for budget revisions as he may determine to be desirable and necessary The 1991 budget was amended tf the diqpartment level . 4) Formal budgetary integration is employed as a management control device during the ye» for the General Fund and Special Revenue Funds Budgetary control for Debt Service Funds is achieved through general obligation K>nd provisions Budgetary amtro! for Capital Froj ct Funds is accxHiqxIished through the use of project controls S) Budgets I6r dM General Fund and Special Revenue Funds are adopted on a basts consiMcnt with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) IflHfgftf^ amounts presented are as originally adopted, or m amended by the City Council Budgeted C^pMMBnirt appropriiaions lapse at year -end. however, the City Council may throve carryover of specifk amounts 32 'I A M : J;. '^^i' fpP- a "r ■ ■ iii' mfeW:. y:?>ia?i-’’f-7 ■/■ CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31. 1991 NOTE 2 - BUDGETS AND BUDGETARY ACCOUNTING (CONTINUED) Durii^ the year, the City made significant budget amendments to the General Fund appropriation and the Special Revenue Funds revenue ‘md appropriations as reflected in the following tables; General Fund Adopted Budget Net Budget Amendment Amc»'ded Budget Department City Council S 65.430 $450 $65.880 Administration 170.570 750 171.320 Finance 144.150 7.150 151,300 Police • 073.870 (39.050)1.034.820 Fire PixMection 180.020 3.600 183.620 Emergmcy Preparedness 3.670 3.050 6,720 Animal Ctmtrol 11.440 2.450 13.890 Recycling Pickup Program 68.390 11.400 79.790 Special Consulting and Police Services 32.250 6.400 38.650 Contingency 65.720 {15.250)50.470 Net amendments S (19.050) The MpMditure budg^ amendments in the General Fund were fi>r the following purposes: City Council - The budgA was increased due to additional publishing costs related to the Truth in Taxation Public Hearing Administratton • The budget was increased due to increased supplies and postage Finance • The budget was increased to reflect the change in personnel step and level adjttttments ori'^t-’any reflected in the C4>ntingenc> and for additional data processing and •quifMnenl maintenance expenditures Police * The budget wu d creased to reflect the purchase of the i99l squad cart duThtg the |uior budget year. Fire Protection • The budget was increased to reflect higher than nuicipated sovioe costs certain provider ettial&llM •’’•nwgfocy Preparedness • The budget was increased to reflect the City ’s agreement to cost ihtfe a thw with a netghK<ring city Animal CotUrol • The budget was increased u» prowde additions) patrol services and u* provide for toertited amomotive mairHenance costs 33 II I I I I I I I I •:V I I I I I I I I I |Y*^^>'. ;V?'. "••■■mI ‘ * I I I mrZ m ^ I r- :'■&ir :^r-K=v »<■ I ■c I\M' CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTANotes to Financial Statements (cc .iinued) December 31. 1991 NOTE 2 • BUDGETS AND BUDGETARY ACCOUNTING (CONTINTJED) Recycling Pickup Program • The budget was increased to provide tor increased personal services and supplies costs due to increased citizen participation in the program. Special Consulting and Police Services - The budget was increased to reflect the higher than anticipated use of these services Contingency - The budget was decreased to reflect the decrease in actual expenditures and/or a reallocation of appropriations to other departments Adopted Net Budget Amended Budget Amendment Budget Special Revenue Funds Revenues Park Interest mcome $ 14.000 $ 650 $ 14.650 Park dedication fees 30.000 (21.0001 9.000 Improvement and Equipment Outlay User fees 3,350 350 3.700 Interest income 22.000 (6.750J 15,250 Sale of equipment -300 300 Building Capital Outlay Interest income 169.640 10.330 179.970 Expenditures Park Capital outlay 11.100 (11.100) Planning project 1.750 1.750 Ifiqtrovcfncm and Equipment Outlay C^iitai outlay 61 350 (14.600)46,750 The revenue budget amendments in the Special Revenue Funds were for the following purposes Park Fund * The budge, changes were to recognize the tiwreased investment earninp and the decreased park dedication fees from developers It fl y .... pic.... Improvetnem and Equipment Outlay Fund - The revenue budget changes were to recogniie Ite increase in equipiramt user charges, the decrease in investment earnings, and the increase la the sale of etpttpment Budding C^ittai Outlay Fund • The revenue mcreavt tv to recognize the increased iBVWtmeni earnings f '>• .,-f .1. mW*f • ^ -\ tiJ- MF . . lai; ,..v^ CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1991 NOTE 2 - BUDOtTS AND BUDGETARY ACCOUNTING (CONTINUED) The expenditure budget amendments in the Special Revenue Funds were for the following purposes: • Perk Fund - The budget for capital outlay was eliminated to provide for a genet al park planning project. * Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund - The budget was decreased to reflect the elimination of certain items from the current budget For I99i no departmental expenditures exceeded appropriations NOTE 3 • CASH AND IN\ ESTMENTS Cash balances of all City fund: are Ciimbmed (p<K)ied) and invested to the extent available in Federal Government Securities and various other investments authorized by Minnesota State Statutes Each fund’s portion of this pool is shown on the financial statements as “cash and investments ' Earnings from such Investments are allocated to the individual funds on the basis of the applicable cash balances available by each of the hinds during the year, and in accordance with State Statutes For purposes of identifying the risk of investing public funds, du* balances are categorized as follows A. Deposits Dffosits consist of checking accounts, savings accounts and certifkates of deposit held in a hank or savings institution. At year*end, the carrying amount of the City’s dep isits was $1,053,021. while the oalance on the bank records was $l,07l,814. As of December 31. 1991. ail deposits of the City were insured or collateralized by securities held by the City or by its agent in the City's name B. Invmtmcfits MirniADCa State Statutes authorize the City to invest in i>bligations of the U S Treasury, agencies, and wstruikiefilalities, shares of investment companies whose only mvestmems are in the aforementioned aecurilies, obligations of the State of Minnesota or its mumcipaiiues. bankers' acceptances, future cooiracsa, repurchase and reverse repurch tse agreements, and ^mmercial paper of the highest tpiality with s maturity of no longer than 270 days Any miu^ial (Hirchase discounts or premiums are amortized over the term of the inv^ment Interest earnings are accrued at die balance sheet dale and recognized 0 rcvmiue when eviwd 35 MMim 1 V ■■ ’t' ;;:■ :y--" '.I. iM.I VA’ rI pAIM-y.Pffev I A>,-I S-. I»;>.'ll' r- % .,■• Arl*- ■ ■'-^'■IrI1^^- I r"', If’ •>'r2 I Wi •t lA,, ^ r*IlAlfc- U0 TiiMmmI;; tm. .,' ■■■'' ■i>^ t?m___ '^i;- « ^.... Blis I Sip ifpSv " ip't AII- . i I ;' ,:'uM"''',psrf:'‘'t i4 iS :;ASj'’ CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTANotes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31. 1991 NOTE 3 - CASH AND INVESTMENTS (CONTINUED) The Clty*i inveitnients are categorized below to give an indication of the level of risk assumed at year- md. Category 1 includes investments that are insured or registered or for which the securities are held hy the City or its agent in the City’s name. Category 2 includes uninsured and unregistered investments fof which the securities are heid by the counterparty’s trust department or agent in the City’s name. Calefory 3 includes uninsured and unregistered investments for which the securities are hdd by the OOWAwparty or by its trust dq^artment or agent but not in the City’s name. Credit Risk Category 1 U.S. Government Securities Commercial Paper Ifinneaott Government Securitiei $ 3,723,562 $ 1.198.875 $ 1.354,948 450.000 S 5.528.510 S 1.198,875 1 Pnviitmefn pool money market Carrying Value Market Value $ 4.922.437 $ 1.354.948 5.257,956 1.373,191 450.000 466.248 6,727,385 7.097.395 3.964.230 3.964.230 S 10.691.615 $11.061.625 Aisacs Held by Deferred Comp ensation Plan Administrators S 345.199 S 345.199 C. CMh on Hand Cash in the possession of the City, consisting of petty cash and change funds, totaled ^360 at year-end 36 1 r U. F.j S'-" m^- m-m m h-’- M m^k p. k M: ■:- .-- Y^m... mi.'km. rf-^k:ni 'mf.. ■'■•:'r mi' ■,J, i- ^ V f:fg£ E|‘ 'II- Mf. ■i . -Ik 3E^ kiwy M'--r -!f7V : > r: ^ ■■ ras CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1991 NOTE 4 - PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT A. Changes In Gcn«‘al Fixed Assets Balance Balance Beginning End of Year Additions Deletions of Year Land and land improvements $ 433.438 $ 189 920 $$ 623,358 Buildings and building improvements 145.958 '«a 145,958 Equipment 965.315 51.785 55.330 961.770 $ I.544.711 S 241.705 $ 55.330 $ 1.731.086 R. Proprietary Fund Type Property, Plant, and Equipment Golf Water Sewer Course Oneratinfi Onerating Ooerating lord Work in process $ 11.583 $ 10.640 $$ 22,223 Land and land improvements 57.132 "127.977 185.109 Buildings and building improvements 77.694 31.014 40,778 149.486 Equipment 35.916 59.803 69.059 164.778 DIstribution/coilection system 2.080.896 6.578.947 -8.659.843 2.263,221 6.680.404 237.814 9,181.439 Less accumulated d^reciation 680.852 2.049.631 40.824 2.771.307 S 1.582.369 $ 4.630.773 S 196.990 S 6.410.132 I I I %■- fi*'- I r I I 'VK ^,Fj. ■a’ ■ . -i: . IliS.-s. ► ;■ ^ ■IiIs r 11-. i I it :.^t. I MlKS5r^ y, ; -r ■ i,.v_,i-‘ :.v-: m u5.. ■-sF^w I I ig%: If. I " -•-•r- Sits. I mM ■t mWt CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31. 1991 NOTE 5 • DEFERRED CREDITS AND REVENUE A. Scwtr Operating Enterprise Fund, Deferred Crt Tbil amount represents the credits resulting from the transfer of the City's sewer treatment facilities to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC). The remaining balances due from MWCC total 1360,972 for the facilities and $2,453 for reserve capacity charges and are included in Due From Other Governmental Units as of December 31, 1991. The total price for each portion of the facilities will be received over 30 years with interest at 4% per annum by credits against the annual sewage handling charges of MWCC. MWCC has included the cost of these facilities in its rate base, thus "payment* of credits is dependent upon MWCC’s setting future user fee.s at a level sufficient to cover all such credits from participating municipalities. Therefore, the revenue has been deferred until such user fees are paid or accrued. ConmosHion of the deferred balance is as follows Facility MWCC Acquisition Year Remaining Deferred Credits Treatment Works 1971 $ 3.532 1963 Interceptor 1977 128.478 1%5 Interceptor 1977 8.590 $ 140.600 i. Contract for Deed Tbo City sold a section of land to a homeowners’ association on a Contract for Deed in February 19S4. The sales price of $100,000 will be received in equal quarterly payments over a 15-year period, wtdiout iflMrmt. At December 31. 1991, the remaining balance of $30,027 on the Contract for Deed is shown as deferred revenue in the General Fund until collected and avail^le to finance current operations. IMS Special Assessments Tbt City adopted a q>ecia] assessment roil in 1985 which included $46,175 relating to improvements on Cily*owiMd pro perty. The General Fund will pay these assessments over 15 years in annual installmems with 9.3% interest. The remaining asscssmem principtd balance of $27,695 ai December 31, 1991 has been recorded ae due to/from other funds. The related revenue and charges have been deferred in the 1913 Impro vement DeN Service and General Funds, rmpectivdy -3i- % '■‘fflh■-t i^llt m m w- i^' ii*'’ m W^ CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31. 1991 NOTE 5 • DEFERRED CREDITS AND REVENUE (CONTINUED) D. 1989 Special Assessments Tlie City adopted special assessment rolls in 1989 which included $8,I3S relating to improvements on CRy*owned property. The General Fund will pay these assessments over five years in annual installments wi^ 1% interest, lie remaining assessment principal balance of $4,484 at December 31. 1991 has been recorded u due to/from other funds. The related revenue and charges have been deferred in the Permanent Improvement Revolving Capital Project and General Funds, respectively. E. Developer Advinccs In 1989, the City began construction of sewer and water improvements along State Highway 12 but has not finalized the amounts tc be specially assessed against benefitted properties. A new residential develt^ment within the project irea was charged a preliminary amount for the improvements. This amount has been deferred in the Vl-.^ter and Sewer (Operating Funds, respectively, net of a 1990 levy on a pMtion of the projects. NOTE i • LONG-TERM DEBT A. Compmicnts of Long-Term Debt On g mil Issue Interest Rate Issue Date Final Maturity Dale Oeoend Long-Term DeN GtmenU Obligation Bonds ImprovMieni Bonds of 1910 Inprovemoit Bondi of 1912 InprovMMOt Bonds of 1985 Public Fecilittet Revenue Bonds of 1991 Vacation and aeverance banefita payaUa To^ Omeral Long-Tcm Or hi Balance End of . Jf-gL, $ $ $ $ 1.100.000 475.000 900.000 4.000.000 N A 7 10-8.75« 6 50-10.00* 5.50-8.25* 4 50-6 50* N A 12-01-80 12-01-82 7-01-85 12-01-91 N A 3-01-96 3-01-99 1-01-01 2-01-08 N'A 375.000 125.000 • I •Mi l l 106.017 5.206.017 Emafpriae Fuad DdH 0.0. Water and Sewer Ravone Bonds of 1989 $ 2.J00.(XXi 6 10-6 60 * 9-16-89 2-01-02 zjomt Total Long-Tenn Dctu I 7.306.017 -39 I % fc I■I'-■'■'.■■• IW''i<: i'Ir ■r Hi? K -,y r'' •. I :t' i-^H. it' F I'■S.'.:- tS't .t5f' i ■I,. IMte P ’■ llS?'3 t - 1^5 ifc CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1991 NOTE € - LONG-TERM DEBT (CONTINUED) R. Statantnt of Changes In Long-Term Debt Ifil' General Long-Term Debt Enterprise Fund Debt T(Mal Balance - beginning of year New deN ittued Ddbt retired Net change in vacation and severance benefits payable $ 1,520.527 $ 2,300,000 $ 3,820,527 4,000,000 (300,000) 4,000,000 (300,000) (14.510)(14.510) Balance - end of year C. Mininiuin Debt Payments S 5.206.017 S 2.300.000 Mbiimum annual principal and interest payments required to retire long-term debt, excluding vacation and severance benefits payable; Year Ending December 31 General Long-Term Debt Enterprise Funds Total 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997-20 397,095 457.765 607,019 596.808 590,367 5.332.542 146.550 316.212 305.450 318,775 306.275 1.8 70.676 543,645 773.977 912.469 915,583 8%,642 7.203.218 t 7.981.596 S 11.245.534 Daicriptloiie aad Rastrictium of Long-Term Debt Genml OMigation Bonds • These bon^is were issued to finance various in^rrovements and will be r§|»id from taxes and special assessments All are backed by the full faith and credit of the Chy. -40 '>’w. lJsl: - ^ t - ■ nif^ ■.xr- r i i A i ii;'.!i :•I'V ■r- ■ ' m|i;-m' w Isiii? »■ irf'i ;;;• d \ - tte I'-*''ifaWJ^k'§sMh4iiitB|;;P CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31. 1991 NOTE ( - LONG-TERM DEBT (CONTINUED) Public Facilities Bonds of 1991 - These bonds were issued by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Orono for the purpose of financing the construction of facilities for a City meeting hall, City offices, police offices, detention and processing, Public Works office space, storage, maintenance and repair of machinery and equipment, and a cold storage building. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 469.103a, lease-purchase contracts between the Authority and the City and a Trust Indenture between the Authority and American National Bank and Trust Company have been established. The bonds are special obligations of the City as issuer and owner of the land and buildings. The City has pledged rental payments in amounts equal to the debt service requirements and plans to appropriate annually City ^nds available for this purpose. In addition, Minnesota Statutes Section 475.50. Subdivision 5(e) allows cities to make a special levy (outside of levy limits) to pay principal and interest on bonds of another political subdivision. The Minnesota Department of Revenue has determined that because a Housing and Redevelopment Authority is a political subdivision of the State, a levy to pay principal and interest on the bonds would be outside the City's levy limits Vacation and Severance Benefits Payable This liability represents vested benefits earned by employees other than Proprietary Fund employees thriiugh the end of the year, which will be paid or used in future periods. The liability for Proprietary Fund employees is included in the accrued Habilitics of those funds. G.O. Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds of 1989 - These bonds were issued to finance improvements to the water and sewer systems and w ill be repaid from net revenues of the water Mid Mwer systems, connection charges, and special assessments levied against benefitted properties. Under the resolution authorizing the sale of the bonds, the City is required to have ill a Water and Sewer Bond Restricted Cash Account an amount not less than the total amount of the principal and interest on the bonds due and payable the following year. Ankiunts ciedited to the WatM and Sewer Account are to tie used only for payment of principal and interest on the bonds. Net revenue of the Water and Sewer Systems after payment of operation and maintenance expenses are available to be credited to the Water and Sewer Bond Account as required. Unspent bond proceeds received are restricted for debt serv ice or construction in the WMtr and Sewer Opiating Enterprise Funds B. Uiliiiwle Rcaponsibittly for Debt Lonifplerm debt is backed by the full faith and credit of the City, except the Public Facilities Revenue Bonds of 1991 mm I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .-r 7 “■iIpm V I,11;: ,.2 p . .r i0. ^■ 'C ■I1 - .iiy.... -Lk-: V' P r% .‘-i I SS;,".J-W'' iw ■rm:' vr^v IfP*:,# Irf 'W'" PT f ' 7 5r%^^ ■ t ■ Sf i*S: CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1991 NOnTE t • LONG-TERM DEBT (CONTINUED) W, Mmouftm to Med Future Debt Requironcnts Amounti Available for Long-Term Debt • Available fund balance or retained earnings designated or reserved for payment of long-term debt includes; General Fund Debt Service Funds Enterprise Funds 106.017 1.217.247 203.285 S 1.526.549 Amouitt to be Provided in the General Long-Term Debt Account Group - This represents future funding of severance and vacation benefits and future taxes and special assessment collections detignded for repayment of bonds. liOTE 7 • DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANS The Chy offers its employees deferred compensation plans created in accordance with Internal Revenue Cffde Section 457. The Plans, available to all employees, permit them to defer a portion of their salary tniil future yean. The deferred compensation not available to employees until termination, retirement, Mh, or wnforeteen emergency. ^ amouatt of oonpeoution deferred und« the Plans, all property and rights purchased with those Hftniinti, and all income attributable to those amounts are solely the property and rights of the City. nAjen lo the claims of the City ’s general creditors Participants' nghis undw the Plaitt are equal to Ihoee of genoil CTeditors of the City in an amount equal to the fair market value of the deferred accouitt for each partkipaai. llw City has no liability for losses under the Plans but does have the duty of due care that would be required of an ordinary prudent investor The City believes that it is unlikely that it will use the assets 10 latisfy the rfafana of general creditors in the foture. ”i‘l Vi - .W- ^ .43 m 7 --1*‘ i i I I ■4 i I^1 ! m f § ■a| % 1 I m em m rmuMmt'V. " >-'X ' , v^'-'' mm r'i.-¥ W^% ii' 0r iSfeW, CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31. 1991 NOTE S - FLEXIBLE BENEHT PLAN Infective January 1, 1991, the City established the City of Orono Flexible Benefit Plan. The Plan is a *cafaieria plan* under Section 125 of the Internal Revenue Code. All employees who meet the eligibility requirements may participate in the Plan. To be eligible an employee must be at least 20 years of age and be an enq>loyee who is regularly scheduled to work more than 20 hours per week. Bigible employees can elect to participate by contributing pre-tax dollars withheld from payroll checks to ^ Plan for health care and dependent care be nefits Payments are made from the Plan to participating employees upon submitting a request for reimbursement of eligible expenses actually incurred by the participant. All assets of the Plan are held by the City. The Plan is administered by an independent contract administrator for child care and medical expense reimbursements, and by the City for health insurance pTWihims. The Plan is included in the financial statements as an Expendable Trust Fund. All Plan propert y and income attributable to that property is solely the property of the City, subject to thedaime of the City's general creditors Participants’ rights under the Plan are equal to those of general craditoriof bte CHy in an amount equal to the eligible health care and dependent care expenses incurred by the paiticipaitts. The City believes that it is unlikely that it will use the assets to satisfy the claims of gMCral credtors in the future. NOTE V - DEHNED BENERT PENSION PLANS • STATEWIDE A. Plan DcKriptkMi All ftill*liaie and certain part-time employees of the City of Orono are covered by defined benefit pension plliS administered by the Public Employees' Retirement Association of Minnesota (PERA) PERA •dministert the Public Employees' Retirement fund (PERF) and the Public Employe^' Police and Fire Fuad (PEPFF) which are cost-sharing multiple-employer retirement plans. PERF members belong to •kher Bie COordiamed Plan or die Basic Man. Cmirdinated members are covered by Social Security and toic BMHBbirs art not. All new members must participate in the Co^>rdmated Plan All police officers, fife fl^Ners, and peace ofRcen who qualify for membership by Statute are covered by the PEPFF. The p^frotl for employees covered by PERF and PEPFF for the year ended December 31, 1991 was 1103.033 and $618,262, respectively, the City ’s total payroll was $1,521,522 PERA piovkim radremcm benefits as well as disability benefits to members, and benefits to mrvivors ^KMl dcmb of eligible mmnben. Benefits are mtidilished by State Statute md vest after three years of CTldited twice. The defined retirmnent benefits arc based on a member’s average sdary for any five mcceilivf years of allowable service, age. and years of credit m termination of ser. tee. Two meth are uaed to compute benefits for Coordinated and Basic members *»i. I I I i I I I I if ’ ' Jf •.I f-M! r'i iirI r';: I I I I fkz; CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31. 1991 NOTE 9 - DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS • STATEWIDE (CONTINUED) Th# retiring member receives the higher of step-rate benefit accrual formula (Method 1) or a level accrual ftmmila (Method 2). Under Method 1, the annuity accrual rate for a Basic member is 2.0% of the ivwi^c salary for each of the first ten years of service and 2.5% for each remaining year. For a Coordinated member, the annuity accrual rate is 1 0% the average salary for each of the first ten years •mA 1.5% for eadi remaining year. Using Method 2, the annuity accrual rate is 2.5% of the average ■alary for Basic members and 1.5% for Coordinated members. For PEPFF members, the annuity accrual fllf is 2.5% for each year of service. For PERF members whose annuity is calculated using Method I, and for all PEPFF members, a foil annuity is available when age plus years t)f service equal 90. Th«‘e are different types of annuities available to members upon retirement. A normal annuity is a lifetime annuity that ceases upon the death of the retiree No survivor annuity is payable. There are also vviovs types of Joint and survivor annuity options available which will reduce the monthly normal annuity amount, because the annuity is payable over joint lives Members may also leave their fflBtfibut^nf in the fond upon termination of public service, in order to qualify for a deferred annuity at retirement age. Refonds of contributions are available at any time to members who leave public MTvice, but before retirement benefits begin. B. Cuntributions Required and Contributions Made Minnesota Stmutes Chapter 353 sets the rates for employer and employee contributions. The City makes contributions to the pension plans equal to the amount required by State Statutes. According to MinnaaoU Statutes Chapter 356.215. Subdivision 4(g). the date of full fonding required for the PERF and die PEPFF is the year 2020. As part of the annual actuarial valuation. FERA's actuary determines the nifflciency of the statutory corttributlon rates towjuds meeting the required full fonding deadline. The actuary comparm the actual contribution rate to a “required" contribution rate. Curreitt coodtined statutory conuibution rates and actuarially required contribution rates for the plans are as folloivs: Statutorv Rates Emplosees Employer Required Ratev PERF (Basic and Coordinated Plans) PEPFF 4 44% 8 00% 4 81% 12 00% 10 04% 17 56% W-':' E*S‘-'. i|fc ili' r’ - f; '«'^- 1^: -• Ppi^v, ^ y-' ^ L i ’ • il ■;*f • m^: i. 1-- :-nr Kg;. «s CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1991 NOTE • • DEHNED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS - STATEWIDE (CONTINUED) Total contributions made by the City during fisca> year 1991 were Amounts Percentage of Covered Payroll Employees Employer Employees Employer PERF PEPFF 33,985 $ 49.460 35,976 74.191 4 23% 8 00% 4 48% 12 00% $ 83.445 S 110^167 Ihe City ’s contribution (employer ’s share) for the year ended December 31. 1991 to the PERF npresettted 0.04% of total contributions required of all partic'pating entities For the PEPFF, eofltributions for the year ended December 31, 1991 represente<ii 0.28% of total contributions required of all participating entities C. P^MkHng Status and Progran I) Pension Benefit Obligation The *p«uk>n benefit obligation' is a standardized disclosure mea.sure of the present value of pension benefits, adjusted tor the effects of projected salary tncrea.ses and stcp>rate benefits, estimated to be payable in the future as a result of employee service to date The measure, which b die actuarial present value of credited projected benefits, is intended to help users assess reRA's funding status on a going-concern basis, assess,,regress made accumulating sufficient ataets to pay benefits when due. and make comparisons among Public Employees ’ Retirement Syatema ml mong employers. PERA does not make separate measurements of assets and pension benefit obligation for individual employers The pension benefit c^ligations a.s i>f June 30. 199) are shown below £EEL PE PH fin Thousands Total pension benefu obligation Net assets available for benefits, at cost (market value tor PERF » $3,662,769; PEPFF • $872,430) $ 4.458.010 S 732.911 I mj2i I Unfiinded (Ass^s in Excess oO Pension Benefit Obligttton I 933.939 I (90.214)I I I J. L-'i-■a<e-::. f ■ I I I .,^LI Ir:- '■ ' — c' I i ■ ''a;-'I {.• y •■y#S I I ■ I M'' j Vf.-ti- Iii. • W'Vi.I t:S K- :; r. I P-: m ■ I ^r--; '-i- 1fe- lit: W&i CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31. 1991 note 9 - DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS - STATEWIDE (CONTINUED) The measurement of the pension benefit obligation is based on an actuarial valuation as of June 30, 1991. Net assets available to pay pension ben«>fit.s were valued as of June 30, 1991. 2) Chanfcs In Bcncfil Provisiona During the 1991 legislative session, benefit improvements were obtained for survivors of members in the Basic Plan and the Police and Fire Fund. In the Basic Plan, the maximum family death benefit was increased from $1,000 per month to 70% of the member’s average salary. In the Pt^ice and Fire Fund, childien’s benefits were restored for families of disabled members who had chosen the joint and survivor annuity option before death The effect of these changes increased the pension benefit obligation in the PERF by $4,016,869 and had essentially no effect <m the pension benefit obligation in the PEPFF D. Toi-Ycar Wstorioil Trend Information Tm-yetf historical trend information is presented in PERA’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ended June 30, 1991. Ti..s information is useful in assessing the pension plan's accumulation of tuffkieni assets to pay pension benefits as they become due. E. Beteled Party Investments As of JuM 30, 1991, and for the fiscal year then ended. PERA held no securities issued by the City or other rdtfed parties. NOTE 10 • INDIVIDUAL FUND DISCUJSURFJs A. tiNorfund Advances Advances To Advances From Gowral Fund Building CiK)ital Oitlay Fund Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund 1991 Public Facilities Fund 56 900 285.689 56,900 2iLm % »2Jif9 S 342.519 •t,. 1 im %w-fci h fi- •• r-. I t:r i^. CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Staiejnenis (continueJ) December 31. 1991 NOTE iO - INDIVIDUAL FUND DISCLOSURES (CONTINUI In 1988, the General Fund advanced $113,541 to the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund to pay the construction costs of the County Road 15 street light project. The a dvance is considered a loan and it subject to repayment from the Permanent Improvement Revolving l und to the Genera: Fund from special assessment' levivj against properties determined to benefit f »ie< * Becai e of the long term nature of d.< nlvmce, the fund balance has been reserved in .i Gen • l nd for ' corresponding amount. In 1991, $20,032 was co.lccted and applied to the adva.K !e.- • . j ^ of $56,900 at December 31, 1991. In 1991, the Building Capital Outlay Fund advanced $'?85,689 u the IVvi blic Facilities Capital Project Fund for the purpt^seof paying land acquisition, construction, and telat..: costs regarding the new Chy Hall, City offices, police facilities, and Public Works facilities pioie.t The advance is considered a loan and is to be repaid from Nmd proceeds ot the Public Facilities Revenue Bonds sold in 1991. B. Intcrfund Receivables and Payables at Year-End Intertund Receivables 'fund Fisv^bles General Fund Special Revenue Funds Park Debt Service Funds 1985 Improvement Capital Project Funds Permanent Improvement Revolving Enterprise Funds Water Operating Sewer Operating $ 12.191 $ 48.240 14.912 27.6^)5 4.4P4 1.354 2,443 6.099 8.740 $ 63.QV^ $ 6^079 C. IntCffund Operating Transfers Made During the Year Fund From Amount Purpose Gcne'al liTtprovement and $ 60.750 Capital Outlay Expenditures Equipment Outlay Building Cap ’ial Outlay General 102.o‘>0 Current Opel tting Exp tditures k ■ I li 1 n I -i- t" .'■I___ " ;••«P'. IS' I I I I I I I IJt!’' vV'. I r-‘.fj CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1991 NOTE 10 - INDIVIDUAL FUND DISCLOSURES (CONTINUED) D. Other Indiiiduti Fund Information The Minnesota State-Aid Streets Fund has a deficit fund balance of $402 at December 31. 1991. The defich be funded with dedicated municipal State-aid or by a transfer from another fund. For various reasons, certain funds have a portion of their fund equity reserved or designated for specific purposes. A discussion of each such item as it appears on the Combined Balance Sheet follows: lleaervallon of Retained Earning.s * Reserve for Revenue Bond Debt Ser»'ice - fbis reserve in the Water and Sewer Operating Funds r^rcsepo fund balances which are presently committed to provide financial resources to pay principal and interest on the City ’s general obligation water and sewer revenue bonds. Rcatf ration of Fund Balaines Reserves for Advances to Other Funds and Prepaid Expenses - This reserve in the General and Building Capital Oitlay Funds represents the amount of fund balance which does not represent spendable resources of th? General and Building Capital Outlay Funds. tignated for Unreserved Fund Balances Designated for Road/Bridge Projects - This amount in the Permanent Improvement Revolving Cig>ital Project Fund represents fund balance which has been designated for specific road and brMge in^rovement projects. Deiigntted for Emergency Contingencies - This amount in the Permanent Improvement Revolving Capital Project Fund represents fond balances which have been designated by the City Council to be segregated as an emergency source of funds. Dcaignated for Construction - This amount represents fond balances which are committed to pay for construction of the City facilities project aists in the 1991 Public Facilities CapitiJ Project Fund. Designated for Capital Outlay - These amounts represent fond balances which are committed to pay for capital outlay in the Speco'l Revenue Funds DetigiUded for Debt Service • These amounts represent fond balances which arc prMntly OCMmiiifled to provide financial resources to pay incipal and interest on the City ’s gciM^ obligMioa bonds Daaigntged for VactUioA/Sevefance Benefits • Thi.\ amount in the General Fund represents fond balance which has b^n designated for payment of the estimated long-term ii^ility for vacation and severance benefits .• .1 i ' ■■ ^ r \■A , Am. |vmr v^(!^ i- • ■ .1 ► ’ ■ JKaa* ■*•.;■: -I .'. • ■■r't: -f'. t||^f =-^vv:*' '■1'm ■ '• /i :••••.*■ /.^p. ' ^ yS i-r'.; ?5:f- 0:'' if®m.-UpHw M V $:■ 1 W'p* -Mt 1®i'M-:vm ^■.mM i " '■'^m ■■t r fVr' *>?■?* > (p rr t‘- 0P^ MB 1^-;- #' CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1991 NOTE 11 - SEGMENT INFORMATION FOR ENTERPRISE FUNDS TIm City pi'ovides services which are accounted for in the Enterprise Funds The segment informatio for these Enterprise Funds for the year ended December 31, 1991 is as follows; Water Ooeratine Sewer Ooeratine Golf Course Oneratine Total Opwatinf Revenue or Gross Profit $157,152 S 446.776 $131.432 $735.360 Depreciation Expense $38.902 $131,879 $4.919 $175,700 OpCTtting Income (Loss)$(43.760)$(28,333)$23,459 $(48.634) Net Income (Loss) Property, Plant, and $(43,082)$63,190 $25.603 $45.711 Erpiiptnem - Additions Net working Capital $118,289 $94,327 $5.788 $218.404 $162.463 $1.174.871 $62,884 $1,400,218 Bonds Payable $U63.570 $1,136,430 $-$‘>,300.000 Total Assets $2,552,972 $7.053.094 S 262,020 $9,868,086 Total Equity $1,249,547 $5.693,451 $253,837 $7.196,835 NOTE 12 - PROPRIETARY FUNDS CONTRIBUTED CAPITAL This balance represents the cost of property contributed to the Enterprise Funds by the City, less depreciation thereon charged to operations. Changes occurring in this account during the year were as follows: Golf Water Sewer Course Ooeratins Oner at me Ooeratinc Total Balance - beginning of year $ 1.13 >.425 $ 4.321.500 J 145.546 $5.606.471 Less Depr^iation on contributed assets 33,329 127.264 256 160.849 Loss on d«noIished asset -4.777 -4.777 Balance • end of year S 1.106.096 S 4.189.459 S 145.290 1 5.440.845 NOTE 13 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES QasiM 1M City and its iiour^ were named as defendants in a case filed in May 1989 A former police officer, while on duty, was injured in an automobile accident in February 1985 by an uninsured motoric and is lerting compensation undo^ the uninsured nHitorist benefit of the City ‘s insurance policy in an amoum It eac^ of S5O.C00. The CHy's insurei is providing defense of this claim -49 -TSII I I I f'2 I I I I I I I I I I "1 I I I I IN; IP'-,v I p-f..: . I I Ite:I I I- Fr I I t;:." p J-K I Ifci'vS- k""''h> ■m- I , .u, .4., K I s.-: * ,5, :v . ' /'r I I I ■V. fv_. CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1991 NOTE 13 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED) The City was named as defendant in a case filed in July 1990. The suit alleges the City caused the illegal nmoval of a nonconforming boat dock without compensation and that the City ordinances relating to boa; docks are vague. The plaintiffs are seeking compensation in an amount in excess of $50,000. The City's famirer is providing defense of this claim. Sewal othw claims have been filed against the City. The City's insurei has accepted defense of these Tilt outcome of each of these cases is unknown It is not determinable at this time whether unfavorable lettlemeflis of the claims will exceed insurance coverage City management believes that the City will not incur any monetary loss relating to the cases No loss has been recorded on the City’s financial aiaicmcfitt rdating to the claims. During the year ended December 31, 1991, the City awarded certain contracts for various construction projacta for the Water and Sewer Funds and for the construction of the new City facilities. The City’s commitmeni lor uncompleted work on these contracts ;*t December 31, 1991 was approximately $893,700. Faeilitv I Diirillg the year ended December 31, 1991 . the City entered into an unconditional lease with the Housing and Raitovtdopment Authority of Orono for the City Hall and the police and public works facilities. The leaM with an option to purchase continues until February 1 . 2008 or until terminated through cancellation by not af^ropriating sufficient funds for payment, defeasance, default. 0. purchase of the project by the City. *rhe City is responsible for the real estate taxes, insurance, utilities, and maintenance of die property. There was no rent expense in 1991. Minimum rental commitments under the lea.se at December 31. 1991 are Year Amount 1992 S 155.232 1993 2.32.848 19^4 394.135 I9V5 3%.266 19%402.455 Thereafter 4.919 104 f 6.5.J.040 11m lease {nirchasa payments will equal the principal and into^est due on the HRA Public FacUitiM Bond of 1991 issued to construct the facilities. ............................■ A... - . •'•4 I& IWh i-:M' ■ ' ■toj.-'i ' •I' I I ih: "Mr I fk : -i, f '<^- "t -■au ■li «•># .p S ¥ I 4^m r , . iT-i , :; ./.f I <■■*■' '•H■ m 'M'- ->c I ;■?/ ';-7?. I?--... .I ypi- ^: :i-' i ^4“' •• ■ •■ • I %:’W^m COMBINING AND INDIVIDUAL FUND STATEMENTS 7m^■4'■I! i .. ,;8 ■m ijiiyfs'"'' #iS“'^•i •-• j-5-1It. ttiiii'|:-s. IIS'i I f-:r f I I j' \s^ > : kM-.V' i/’Mi GENERAL FUND ■>* i- ' TI hi Otncnd Fund it the general operating fund of the City It is used to account for all financial fViOiireil except those required to be accounted for in another fund lU-ilP',: wAk. ■ j I ►i4i .1 : 1III' IW- V-1 ‘I-:' ■■ , v.,.-.:A.- jSfei?:' ■i m /.i5t - ‘H ■■ 'm'-V ^•\ I #^ si'; &r.’t-''' :'i"- =r r* ■' ( : Sv f i- W K' tfyr yff> ■4^ >k: W- m.m 4- N *ri'. fe- . c-'-i' . I- * mm ^:U. ^P- 'W \yr^K m':' ; -Iff- ■ y :- ■ ^ ->'fe|§- : I'fit,:,-: CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA General Fund Q)mparative Balance Sheet As ot December 31,1991 and 1990 1991 Assets Qtth and temporary investments Receivables Tc^l liabilities and fund cuuttv Exhibit B>I 1990 S 995,460 $ 862,842 Accounts 7.2H1 14,833 Accrued interest 86,087 78.060 Delinquent taxes 83,492 69,118 Delinquent special assessmem —299 Contract for deed 30,027 34,313 Due firom other funds 12,191 5,163 Advances to other funds 56,900 76,932 Due from other govemmenuil units 39,320 55,107 lYqaiid hems 2.903 55,918 Deferred charge ~ assessments on property owned by City 32.179 37,416 Other assets 5,833 4,406 Total assets $ 1,351,673 $ 1,304,407 Liabilities and Fund Equity Liabilities Acoouiits pyable $ 102,125 $ 52.575 Accrued salaries payable 38,894 36,644 Due ID other funds 48.240 43,181 Due to other governmental units 63,143 29,199 Deferred revenue Contract for deed 30.027 34.313 Delinquent taxes and special assessments 83.492 69.417 Total liabilities 365,921 265.329 Raid equity IHmd balance Reserved for prepaid items 2.903 55,918 Reserved for advances to tHher runds 56.900 76,932 Uimcrved Ociignned for vested vacation and severance benefits 106.017 120,527 Undcsignated 819.932 7*5.701 Total hind equity 985.752 1,039,078 S.L35 1,673 1X304,^7 I ;'S • ‘ ■'a V:- 4 % J ' ' -V r^ 7^* • Exhibit B4 i crrv OFORONO, Minnesota ^ >■ h I ■, ?* ' - i : ifc 1 General Fund Statement (^ Revenue. Expenditures, and Ouingcs in Fund Balance Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actu.'il Year Ended December .^1. 1991 (with Comparative Actual Amounts for Year (jided December !tl, 1990) I Jr. i-jrr: I I Reveotae Ihxet Properly Penalties and interest Total taxes I I1 r*; R-, ■^■ I fv ■ I 'Mr i. W- I w- IIP '• ‘c-!-VI w I ■it'- '•rfi;?' rs|^SiiS’ ii'. I i9’<« ■ rSlSif" UocMes and permits Uoaates Pnmits Total licenses and permits iHWfovenunental Frderal emergency preparedness State grenu Homestead and agricultural credit aid Police town aid Police training reimbursenx'ni Municipal State-aid sinets County grant-recycling aber Total intergovernmental Qnrgcf for services Graaiai govenuneni Public safety Total charges for services Fines and forfeits Other Interest earned on investments Reau Riftmds and reimbursements Special ancssoKnts Pr'Tcandi from contract for deed-land sale MisceOancout Tout other Toul ret«nue £ (condaued) 1 1991 1990 Over (Under) Budget Actual Budget Actual S 1.650.741 $ 1.618.008 $ (52,755)$ 1,571,704 6.499 2,224 10.072 1.65T.240 1.620.252 (57.008)1,.5'8 1.776 14.500 14.529 229 8,641 • 109.000 66,675 (42,527)127,911 j 125:500 8f.202 (42.098)1.56,552 ■1 6.(KMJ 4,556 (1.444)4,862 i i 656 656 2.801 •( ,1 69,000 75.752 4.7.52 70.955 6,700 6.064 (656)6.440 60.0(XJ 59.9%(4)51.452 j 54.000 55.872 (128)19,024 5.000 -(5,000)- 180.700 ■ 178,876 (1.824)1.55,512 168.250 156.592 (51,858)154.192 601,800 589.726 (12,074) 604,177 77(>:n5()726,118 (45,95?)75S..569 118,150 72.728 (45.422)108.251 i 55.500 45.897 (9.405)195.6(M 5.4f4)5.400 -5.400 -2,627 2.627 8,447 • -596 596 681 4.500 4,286 (14)8,566 i7‘, 1 7.450 15,650 6.200 12,555 . 70.4^0 70.456 6 251.051 2.919.890 2,749.612 (170.278)2,951.471 5 'IT-Exhibit B-2 OTVOFORONO. MINNESOTA General Fund (continued) Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Qraafes in Fund Balance Bm%et (GAAP Buis) and Actual Year EMled December 31,1991 (with Gompaiitive Actual Amounts for Year Ended December 31, 1990) Ehp wdit Mini General foverement Mayor and council Personal services Sunolies savices and charges Total nayor and council ■br<% Adninistration INnanal services Supplies Ollw services and charges Iblal athninistrstioo P K'ii. ..A. Personal services Supplies Otha services ard charges Total elec jons Asaessiaf services Sitpplies aavkes Total assessing pBraonal services Afplies CMhar services and charges Total Onanoe Legal Chha services and charges (Mner arivioes aiul charges 54 1991 1990 Over (Under)1 fidget Actual fidget Actual 16,010 15,974 (36)15,916 1 1 400 296 (104)156 w 49,470 49,583 113 43300 65,880 65,853 (27)59,452 1 145,370 144,464 (906)139,428 3 480 3,47.3 (7)A029 I' 22,470 23,366 896 23,380 171,320 171,3()3 (17)166,837 |i 1,740 371 (IW)9,618 V 1 ! __ 4 —35 35 386 1 320 324 4 1342 11346 w. 730'(1330) 1,400 941 (459)1,087 1,350 1 246 (104)1.631 69,130 69,305 175 67.869 1 71,880 71.492 (3» )70387 i 116,830 116,712 (118)104.6!^II 1,450 854 (596)925 : 33,020 33,441 421 32,835 ■m 151,300 151,007 cm 138.455 1 204,700 137,581 (6M19)184356 13,980 13,760 (220)11J62 ■ (coSimKd) I w^<V.i ;'!* ■;* ' I ■m ;^vvrmm^^' f' V,'I I V S:. I-.f- r r. Jl 1^;- i"‘ t.I••>. •;; l>.‘fr-'A. I'H#■n Ip'v1 w ■\: ifj.: '■A- I m: rr ■f I" ■ LU gy-: ?.’k. I r-A iisS I v;-- ‘*k 1.:.'i- ■•vM ■f .*-'■ i I K.R;‘w. MsU- g ilfii' ||ar'^'■RK.:. ...A j OTV OFORONO, MINNESOTA General Fund (continued) Sutement of Revenue, ExpendUturea, and Obainfet in Ftmd Rabnce Budfet (GAAP Buia) and Actual Year Bided December .M, 1991 (with Comparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended Decemoer 31 1990) (f Ometal pomnnMit (continued) Oeoeral r^wnent buildiDgs • <t: lies f aervices and charges Total general government buildings Total general goverameoi Pttbik safety PoUcc protection Fenonal services Supplies Other services and charges Chpital outlay Total police protection Fire protection Ctantracted fife protection Ivc hupcction and roning Supplies Other aervices and charges Total protective inspnciian and aoning SifPli** Other snvices and charges m’■■■'-liiiadi ExUWtB^ 1991 1990 Budget Actual Over (Under) Bidget Actual 11,430 11,143 (287)10,127 1,600 1,834 234 2,251 30,710 27,402 (3308)28,103 43,740 40,379 (3361)40,481 iu,m 652,105 (72.755)683,176 842.240 825,478 (16.762)817,389 58,000 51,982 (6,018)55,042 131,630 143,523 11,893 125,880 2,950 1,653 (1.297)82.894 1,034,820 1,022,636 (12.184)1,081.205 183,620 183,577 (A3)159,416 246,000 243.130 (2,870)206.737 9,830 4,620 (5310)5,933 38,000 35,638 (3,162)34,690 294,630 283388 (11342>247360 1^0 108 (42)67 6,570 6367 (5)1,916 6,720 6,675 (43)1.983 (cnottnued) m.t-’■A s ■m ■ vv. #• if-"-'".. p' : : != :%>fc :mm asi *-iMk ■ - Vm: iflite’' iP$r& .*^’- I#? "slSf:''%->5 W '.'ir' t .t . ■ ■' :, * ■' -0$k : . :• ; * kvV'- OTV OF ORONO, MINNESOl A Geoeiml Fund (caMinued) Stelement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Qmnfes in Fund Balance BiK%el GAAP Basis) and Actual Y«ar Ended December 31, 1991 (with Goo^sarative Actual Amounts for Year Ended December 31, 1990) Expenditures (continued) Pttblic a^y (oominued) Amaml ooirirol l^fonal Krvices Supplies Other services and charges Total animal control » - Total public safety Streets PTMoal services Suppikt services and charges Total streets RMta and recreation tafsonai services Supplies service! and diarges Total paiks ai^ rrcreaiion Racydinf pidhup progiam HiwmI services ShippUea Olhm service and durpes Total recycling pich-up program MHctHanrous Engineering Special mrvkies-cflnsultiog,<pi4ice Goothifency Total mMi,cilnacous Total expendituret Exvctt (Jefictnicy) d Budgei 9,600 550 3,740 13,890 1,533,680 206,550 181,500 86,720 474.770 34,180 3,800 15,310 53.290 12,350 530 66,910 79,790 4,950 38,650 50.470 94,070 2,960,460 (40,570) 56 1991 Actual 9,591 385 3,886 13,862 1.510,138 205.389 179,028 89,933 474^350 27,640 2,382 |4,7i^ 44.791 12,309 513 _ 79,714 4.745 38,597 40,438 _83,780 1844.878 (95.266) Over (Under) Budget (9) M65) 146m (U61) (1472) 3,213 (420) (6.540) (1.418) (541) (8.499) (41) (T) j 2«) (76) (205) (53) (54,696) Exhibit B-2 1990 Actual 9,027 408 ^9J4 12349 (23.542) 1.502.313 213,550 169362 8830S 471.420 .34.292 1170 11,667 48,129 254 959 .30,400 3 3.816 45.722 15.627 75,165 (115,582) 181 1,816 139.655 (cceiinued) 'I ----'r-T----—T" ...... rr^StS- % - 4'1 '• 4; ':' Exhibit B-2OTV OFORONO. MlNNESarA Geoeiml Ftnid (cantinued) SUitenieot of Revenue, Expendituies. and GMUtges in Fund Balance Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual Year Ended December 31, 1991 (with Comparative Actual Anuiunts for Year Ended December 31, 19%) Other financing sonroes (uses) Jpemting tnaafan in (out) nram Fannanent Improvement Revolving Fund Fhn Buildiag Fund To Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund To Permanenl Improvanest Revolving Fund Total odK-r fuancing sources (uses) Excess (deficiency) of revenue and other financing sources over expen- chtures and other financing uses Ftmd balance Begfamtng of year End of year ........... 1991 19% Pudget Actual Over (Under) Budget Actual 17,680 102,690 (60,750) 102.6% (60,750) (17,680) (58,700) (30,000) 59 620 41,^0 (17,680)(88,700) $ 19,050 (53.326)1 I72J76J 50,955 1,039,078 988,123 $ 985.752 M.0»,0?8 1 ‘•i*I I r.I b S' -I'", -I ir::i.. .',-■ b|i|f* V’I I t'- t yl ' ::rl. ^"' lb - '■'' iF*'“I ?:*■ Iky I:i'' •_ « ‘ I ■i^- ^v- I I•f. .JmIm•■5' K ‘ '..■'^i' IS I', i; ]'.y-'i I • ■ b:„V' rv ••• ■Ti"^ ____r-- b S.u;^■ ■ ■:' •S'?-' : ,,-:-S'; -;^; ; . , MM............... SPECIAL REVENL E FUNDS Spccill Rtvenic Funds are used to account for revenutr derived from specific revenue sources that are Mildly mcricted to expenditures for specific purposes PHrli Ftmd * used to account for park dedication fees received to t>e used for land acquisition and park MM InpnHrMMHil and Equipment Capital Outlay Fund - used to replace non-enterprise, non-poirce City ipnaoi Capital Oidlay Fund * used to partially finance building fKilities construction and additiom teioufli tfaasfm from the Genera) Fund S» mi i 1 •y;,- <V ¥W. ■■ \: R,; •■'m- ji. ir §'■ ’ ■ ■\KaJ*'T- •• fe.'i- ':*'•■ ^i,%Wv^md^ ' P'V' :iss mSSs V. i¥:' ' V |»s. R®’ifcllr Exhibit C-lcrry of orono . Minnesota Special Revenue Funds Conihinin( Balance Sheet As of December 31,1991 (with Comparative Totals as of December 31.1990) AMCts QMh and Mninfiry invc Reoeiviblcs Aooounts Acaued interest Dye ton ocher hindK Advances to other binds Toal asHis Lidbilttict an 3 pynd Balai c yik>Uttks Aooounts payable Ooniiacts payable Tbtal UaNlities |\mI balance RcMrvad fcr advances tnotofMi Uveaefued Deai|paied ksr capital outlay Ibtal fluid balance 236.659 36:659 Total liaNItties and bald bahmee |^7J3J ppfe.-" ■■ Improvement and Building Totals Park ^>itlay Qjtlay 1991 1990 S 208.240 $ 243.435 $ 2,285.612 $ 2.737.287 $ 2,603,032 5,760 5.760 38,992 8.225 9.716 76.884 94,825 22,010 14,912 --14,912 6.405 -28J,689 285,689 - ? 237,137 $ 253.151 $ 2.648J85 $ 3.138.473 L2^70^«9 $ 478 $$$ 478 $ 509 ~--—15340 478 478 16.349 285.689 285.689 253 J51 33.151 2^2.496 Z64tt,lb5 3,137,995 2,bS2^ 2A54. “BSC IMM UmM fAimi LMMl II I I I I ■■ .■ ■■ ■>.. ? -V:- ■■ 'll' m. : -P •y#;'n-m- ■fe-Wv :,-V ..• :■-. liilip®Sfr Exhibit G-2OTV OFCWONO, MINNESarA SpacM Re^mnie f^mds CombiiiiBi SUtemeat of Rcvemie, Expenditures, and Qmui^ ia Ftmd Balance Year EwM December 31.1991 (with Conparelive Totals for Year Ended December 31, 1990} Part Uierfeea Stieef ifuipmfat MtAdkationfaes 8,780 14,682 Total revenue 23,462 amrfes QipimI outlay Total expenditures 1,734 Excess (diGciacy) of revaflue over expenditures (uses) fl|imUig Unntfir in {oat) ftom General FUnd IbOauimlPund ToUd other Oeenctai: (uses) end pea- r 21.728 214.931 ^ »4 fiuiiaf ywr wmm ■'Siiiiss —-------------------- Improvnnea and EquipoKot Onlay Building Capital Outlay Totals 1991 3,713 335 15,228 19,286 179.972 179.972 3,713 335 8,780 209,882 222.720 1,7.34 60.750 (102,690) 60.750 (102,690) 60,750 (102,690) 35.542 77.282 134,552 1990 11,417 1000 52.572 70,615 1.36,604 -44,494 -44,494 177,027 1,734 44,494 46,228 177,027 21,728 (25,208)179,972 176.492 (40.413) 58,700 58,^700 18.277 217.609 1221.550 1654.1 1635.813 .349.353 349,353 usm, Lam ikmm t 3.137.9^1 1654.1 •60- -f i ■i V m m. p#.,tei" Exhib:*C-3CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Park Fund Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual Year Ended E>ecember 31.1991 (with Comparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended December 31.1990) Revenue O' liftt dedication fees IMoeit earned on investments Total revenue cnditiact Met and recreation Other oofittilting Me capital outlay Total expenebtures tadhalanoe Beginning of year Excess (deficiency) of revenue over expenditures 1991 1990 Budget Actual OVCT (Under) Budget Actual $ 9,000 $ 8.780 $ (220)$ 52.572 14,650 14,682 32 13.161 23.650 23.462 (188)65,733 1.750 1.734 (16) ——790 1.750 J-7B (16)790 $ 21,900 21.728 $ 0723 64.943 Mofyr'r 214.9^1 $ 236,659 149.9M * ^'1■ivlII I I I I I I 1 I i I I i I I I I I I I I IC0^0-i-K ExhibHOi: :•Hh''CTTY OF ORONO, MINNESOTAi P , ,■, ■ % '^: ::^- U' •'H> I' N: %:■ ^ V ‘ it \ (withO Improvcmciit and Ei|uipnieni Outlay Fund It of Revalue, Expcnditufes, and Ohan^ in Fund Balance Budget (GAAP Basil) and Actual Year Ended Deoemba 31,1991 parative Actual Amounts (or Year Ended Decemba 31,1990) ;'?l4 P A Revenue • 'I ' r». ■v.' User fees Sale of equipment taloeat earned on invesmienu Tbal revenue ■ 4 ^W'- _jlaidby Onoal fovemment AMniamdon department OeoenI govenunent buiklags departroem Public safety Bulking and aoning department Animal oontiol department DsMsyncy pieparedaess PldES :/-■ Ibml capital outlay expenditures Excess (ddkkncy) of ivvcnue over cnendituns Otter fiMndog aoinocs OhHBiiBa Rnafer ki flMiCliA^Fund K:.:Buaa (defldcocy) of ra«ue and odaer financing —“oidNww wm I 33^ 42 1991 Budget Actual Ova (Unda) Budga $ 3,700 $ 3,723 $ 23 300 335 35 15,250 15,228 (22) 19,250 19,286 36 150 147 (3) ——— 850 817 («) ——— ——— 34.000 33315 (685) 11,750 10315 (U35) 46,750 44,494 (2356) (27,500)(25308)2JS2 60,750 60,750 . 1990 Actual 11,417 2.000 16J67 30,284 774 12,053 873 7.828 15,840 96,855 134,223 (103,939) 58,700 - -V ■?> I 'V»1 * ■'■1 4 '•.■i -------..,1:11. -..:.Ur-r. ... .k.. . 35342 f (4Si»)4.-''X 217A09 lajtu f 4 \ :\ A {.^ua t mjm 1 - ------ p |i?:^ m:-"' J^..- ■ - ^:#-k ||la'' «f-S;P. ||r||fki': ita:ISP l'‘ -p-fP' «.; I®'' mmW»$0-^Jit. IpR" m0i V? Exhibited aiY OF ORQNO, MINNESCyrA Duildiiv Cif)ital OutUy Fund Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual Year Ended December 31,1991 (with Comparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended December 31,1990) Revalue Intacst earned on investmoits mStieet Chpilal outlay Mitoellamous E*«*s (deficiency) of levottie over expenditures financing lues Opoatlng transfer (out) To General Amd Cioeu (deficiency) of fcvcnue ova oqxnditures and dUicr financ^ uses Rndhaianoe ic|iMiin|of year llttidHal o|utty ttansfa in Ftam 19f6-9fi baprovosem Bond Dfelit Service Fund 1991 1990 Budget Actual Over (Under) Budga Actual $ 179.970 S 179.972 S 2 $ 40387 42,014 179,970 179.972 2 (1.427) (10Z690)(102.690) 1 77^77,282 $ 2 0.427) 2.221.550 2.22Xn 349353 mm d of year I 2.648,185 II ■J ;r!^ I i=: I I I -R? I I .j I n -a I I I I I I I I I I ■WMSk-i■,VKI% /i? IMt I:ffe n- ■ s.■- ' -t..f i V> f V ' < 1 -- ;- > r 'Tf ' ■ "it ■'■if^-"I: I:-:v, W^r'-'V;‘ la ’'M?%.. '>r:Ir •u'.t:' ■yif ‘''■v<-. ■■'1 s:. -a ■w ■IHi;5^ 13® -aI I - vah^-< ... .V#- te^34.l'jjlj^ v":- ‘. .......:'-€' B'a- w v> .4. *■.#w DEBT SERVICE FUNDS DtN Sifvice Funds are usud to account for the accumulation of resources used for the payment of PfUlci|Ml* ilNerest. and fiscal agent fees on general long-term debt. i i hi mibkAALt P- ■ !-■ ■ vi$fi:-^-fe'-'i*-" ^"’Sr.'-'-s CTJy OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Debt Service Funds Combining Balance Sheet As of December 31,1991 (with Comparative Ttrtals as of December 31.1990) Assets Otth and tcroponry investments Reccivdblct Apcnwd interest IMinf|uent taxes Drtimjucnt special assessments Defeirad ipec^i assessments Due ftom ate ftMKfa Due ftom ate governmental units Rcstrkicd assets Qtth and investmenu Ibtai assets liabilities artd FutkJ Balance LUMUtkt Apoounts payable Deteed revenue Delinquent taxes Special asacssinents Special asietancnis on Dty property Total liabilities tedbal UveMTved Desifniied fbr debt service tbttl liabilitki and fund balance aiflaj8 aa«BKr-x?A^.T5aggr -«5 1966-76 Improve- roeni Bonds 1980 Improve ment Bonds 1982 Improve ment Bonds V’ ' $$ 502,002 $ 109,062 B': ,,f. 20,435 10,085 —729 182 ■ —1.193 6,942 —138.560 7,592 ■ ———■ -254 475 •i ——1 K $ 663,173 S 134.338 i s $$ 135 1 Ml 729 182 1 —139,753 14334 ■ —(----- —140.4H 14.IB1 1 322.691 119.487 1 I I I I II -'■v n- IBs i^t -1^i... ajlfe' Kl'i3J. fo.:l , S-S iI ^ ■ ' i K;. '"^•• S?Vv'1 iIf .■s' if i' I •iff- -rmi I rFs-tF ,»f. [llfei 'r :i^.. I -B. A ■^ll^ u >■ ., ,‘v-'i^'y Msm i|fr'. ;‘-;:'A.r^,.^^-■ ... lig'P; ■ F? . - 13K:>: Iiiif? I 'X:."tssr.^, j ‘£fSS#»S !'-'■' •' >■ .v,>- ' :z^ .,v. 19«5 lm|Pov»>m mcnt Bondi 9^ 1,949 ld.731 142,793vm 59S 770 1,949 159424 Exhibit D-1 1991 public Adlitiet Revenue Bonds Totals 1991 1990 t 1S1.473 S 14,230 469 $ 776.767 $ 1.213,922 40,061 2.860 24.866 288.945 27.695 1,324 58.629 2,048 24.824 389.290 30.775 13.066 400,000 400,000 «»»•»> t 414,699 LL26yi8 UmM ^ *905 677 2.860 313.811 27,695 145^71 2,048 414.114 30,*n5 447:614 140470 lowirniii nwnrfTiiiririi n' i 1 1504 414,699 U17447 1,284,940 , _ v« • g»t iiSMSL \l '■ V . . 'If:#.. hmmmrn.<46> 'V:3 >-i H 1 I 1 f'CtTY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA P'r Debt Service Funds Combining Statement of Revenue, ExpendiUircs. and Changes in Fund Balance Year Ended December 31.1991 (with Comparative Totals (or Year Ended I>cemher 31. 1990) Ifipf Rnowc Mil* mM W mm Ei-'■ ;,S 111Wikm Piopeity ftmUkt and interest ^ SpacW asscatments fe IMndpil, imerest. and penalties iMiO'^nimattal Homeiiead and agricultural credit aid Inmcst earned cm investments Miiocllaneous Total revenue a; Mtiindcc IMetcfit of bund principal iPOTW on Dorios % IfiicenSHOiii Toal expenditures Excess (deficiency) of fcvoMie om etmcnditiaes dug stnaoes ifioeccds Biocsf (deficiency) of revenue and other financing sources over eiqxnditurcs jrgwilngofyt ieridail equity transtcr (out my find of year 1966-76 Impn5vt^- ment Bonds 1980 Improve ment Bonds 1982 Iroprov- mem BotkIs -$ 16.919 S 5,259 —18 — 3.512 79,261 4.805 —7 2 13.569 35.013 8.386 17.081 1^1,224 18,45^ 150.(KK)75,000 25.'X)0 4.500 34,463 12,925 50 400 245 123 680 230 154.673 110,543 38,400 (137.592)20,681 (19,948) (137.592)»).681 (19.948) 486.945 502.0)0 U9.435 (349.35^-- II I I I I I i .1 I I I I I I I I I I I I --fl v'^-r ■ - n^":^ ‘ ■ '--■rij.-j''!W '1* "»■•?vi:,-: # 1 teo im «V.^-t, r"P m.1985 Bondi 'C- p. «C sir 39.777 55 11^.^S' ev 50.828 16 12.964 2430 Ifr :y . ilM I ,‘J • r.E. RfiilSftj;-' 730 ___9( Moi Sfe'3.1 1564^ 7T 1991 Public ndlities Revenue Bonds 469 469 469 414430 414.699 Exhibit I>2 Totals 1991 S 61.955 73 138,412 25 70.401 2,830 273.696 300,000 102,788 1.465 '».013 >6.266 414.230 1484.9^ ^453) I ! rr •. 0^i. ■ m K:v. . r .' r;:, ::. ri 43^-^ » #->-1.VP..iv -^^^^^-^"■-ilifiilfiiiniilf r ili- 1990 55.637 230 169.817 %,874 3.120 325.67K 300400 123.188 1436 1,969 426493 (132470) (100.715) 281.660 (100.715) 14854^5 Lil&ts. UiULI!!. IhSU , ...... I' rririri]iii'iim-ii'irfiiiii>iiiiriiii ii'r :f .*■ .i* Tm a ‘■J ■>- 1?: J *9Ife.V' I ;•? ’• I e Ir: I I r- H- <~Pr ■fe. ?.;• Ife'M . !■ :: ■m. W '“[■■>■ -■* CAPn AL PROJECT FLNDS Clplial Projfct Funds are used to account lor financial resources to be used for the acquisition or otmtnKtKNi of major capital facilities MMMMte 8lait>Aid Strtfts Construction Fund • used to account tor State-aid allotments used vy the City Ibr improv enHW projects to designated roads and bridges within the City iNfmOMM ImproeenMint Revolving Fund - used to account for construction costs prior to obtatning pif Mient financing. Iff! Pinllltc Fadtttics ConstructItNi Fund • used to account for construction costs of new CHy facUitics If—IHii mri- 'ifevfiP-^ 4i^ ■ff ;U>'. m ...m. :01 i A •i j ■'i ■r ^ lA '5 m •# % r. V4 ♦ »■ \4 #. Ivf- < ... -' I % ■/•Vi. |i‘- §'■ %r Kv'' ; f-. Wr fe ‘/v 'm/ l%fr Sf'.'-r M'm-^iy »ff' '■■-■-‘■•-r*'' •>,.> '* . t ^ -■.€|- I-.#hrWv-:.:. SK::-,. ^ ■:-|t5'<,.y:Lv :':■> ■/ ''#.,ir <;|t^V'’'''- I,.,:,. 111 ihfe 1- ’■/V.:-i'-‘ :.r - '-J 'V' V/'•>■*• ■Sm ■.0- t'ft ■ - Y ary of orono. Minnesota Capital Project Funds Qimbining Balance Sheet As of December 31, 1991 (with Comparative Totals as of December 31.1990) Assets Cksh and tempofary investments ReodvdMes Aocnied interest Ddlmpicnl special assessments Deferred spe^l assessments Due from other funds Due from other fovcmmenui units Total assets Liabilities and Fund Balance LUNtities Aooountt payable Oonsicts payable Advances frm other funds Deferred revenue Special assessmems l^pedai assessments on City pn»i>*n\ Total liabiliues $ 2.202 1.249 3.451 *it)fHmd balance (t linreicrvad De^irMcd for foadibridge prujeett Desiiiiaied for cmer|eiKy ountinfenctc» Dliipiaied Ibr coniiruction Tool And halnoc (dcfiai) (402) M) Total ItaNlitica and fond habuicr -7U .VAv;;,|iSiSifeliMVji -jae.., ...av,. 33.732 1.374 81,847 4,484 834 I 3,04 V i,76gJQ0 $ 15.569 11.209 56,900 83.221 4.484 171.383 160J19 415.222 21J76 ^,417 i mm II I I Minnesota Permanent State-Aid Improvement Hi Streets RewIving • i$ 3.049 S 646.529 • I I I I ■M I J. I I I 1 I I I I I MAiS&uii ---- I .•^ -.i:' |ii f ms:.: 'V 'i'A:- >5\r'i'^-' • Cr • ; ■5»:« •#Ili: 'tiSlA.-f'.,'' »SiiIi? ■:i‘ I . ■ ||p:> ■"IpBri yMRKfe. if■:il^-:»• }y- ii» -y-: "4-4-r'' ‘ ■ '>:■ ^v.yi ttMiijk |r- s-'^vri^r'Mmy:. Bllf'Ss '.n>i>,. :,jafc|B Pift-to V..:; P .:,ft I ''ft' 1991 PybUc Exhibit E-1 Totals MUties 1991 1990 $ 3^50,000 $ 4,199,578 $716.084 4,022 37,754 22.690 —1.374 948 -81,847 93,875 —4,484 5.978 —834 383 $ 3 J54.(B2 $ 4.325 871 }J?39,958 $ 75,530 $ 93,301 $1,054 78358 90,816 - »5,689 342,589 76.932 mm 83,221 94,823 4,484 5.978 439,577 614,411 178.787 159.917 147.535 -415322 384.857 3,114,445 3.114,445 - mm 21376 128.779 “TMilF ^yri,4&o W1.171 ilsssm. mmm .aLi. L^wa -71. i <i 1 .1 I 1 bJ ■ftv ■■ft^i % «i:- . ;-v :i: J ’:S .:l-,r'^ M. ft ■ - - '-■ pSy Vf'S'gss?- ■j^-,mmi^ it- »/‘f‘ f ■‘-. ■ miis |fe> pui^ y:K0>“Ip iifta ?:■ -V^.;c . --Um"" ^‘:: j . ,p- W'mmM, crry of orono, Minnesota Capital Project Funds Cbmbininf Statement of Rcvitme, Exp^tures, and Changes in Fund Balance Year Et.ded December 31,1991 (with Comparative Totals for Year Ended December 31,1990) Revenue Ihxcs Fnpmy Special aiicaa.’!scnts PHadpid, interest, :<nd penalties lnier |ove mrae ntal State aid for construction • >77 tatoett earned on investments Miioeiteneous Total revenue SlUiei capital pre bkwie Heighu storm sewer MoQilleyRaad Highiieiy 12andothcr OMOyital Bay Road bridge Stitbba Bay sanitary sewer liavdousbuildihgs HiglnMy 12 fiontage road City hdlMes-stonn sewa, water main, sanitary sewa Qty Hall^fNMic worlcs/frontage road Total expendtures Eioeas (deficiency) of revenue over expenditures Odwr flnaneii^ sources Bondproaoedi Opemditg VMsfers in f¥om Oencnl Fund Total other financing sources IS (dcfidcncy) of revenue and odier ■idUig sources ova expenditaes FMbaknee(de|icii) BcgiMiiiigof year Mol year 72- Minnesota State-Aid Streets $ 32,098 32,098 30.693 75 372 31,140 958 958 . (1-360) Permanent Improvement Revolving 27.979 57,562 486 86.027 2.435 4S 5,676 20.430 122,555 151,141 (65.114) (65,114) 662.531 USLiil iI I I r <fi I I i J i I14 I I ‘ ] ■ I I i 1991 Exhibited fvbUc Totals AdlMa 1991 1990 S $ - $27 -27.979 30,102 -32,098 816 4.022 61,584 55,850 -486 1,912 43®"122,147 88,707 2,435 1,293 -30.693 - -120 — -372 3.951 ~5.676 6,515 -20.430 10,662 --1,744 -122455 — mjT?439477 — 4»jM 621,858 24.165 <435.5551 (499.711)64,542 3.550.000 3450,000 • 30,000 inciiWiH “13SW60 30,000 3.114.445 3,05a289 94442 «•661.171 566,629 umaiL imm tjgyzL •73 ' :‘ -• ‘'in < %mmrr.s£fi'p#i"- , 'vi^^f —-V , ■ f:-vi..v^m. m.‘'•^m, Wigs u. 0.\r r-,5' t'F- , , - ■ '*• JIK#r'?v<-';:v2f- 'm..v.^\' ENTERPRISE FUNDS i_-iv<:-.;2 , .. .T^a,5'- Enltfprbt FMllb Vt us^d to account for the operations of self-supporting activities which render set or go^ lO ttt pobik. The accounting records are maintained on the accrual basis of accounting Wolar Opantfog fOnd - used to account for the provision ot water services to the ri»idents of the City «io iMVt wMer service available. ii»i. . ■ •' '^■ Opvotiag Fund • used to account 7 sewff service available ofdttCity OdFCOMTit Opariting Fund - used lo account for the golf course operation sales tmd related expenses ■< *• ■' i>B»r 'VT- iBB' '&m- te&rv >4 ■ Cio •' Iff .-pN^ s - ■ HiMW^ IU§P^0PPi‘ ‘ S "•*• Im#'mm,’f ; -74- SISS-IW-,' •J'W:M‘ r >} 'h ■■¥.a - • •• -^1 ' ..#« -H I f 7 ” V ■ T- fVV ■‘•»' •i'' <V M- iv> i te'. ■ . . rv M:Pi (!■,•■ - V. . u . iPxl- f ivV'.-' r ■' iir:" hw life:. ; ■ “Hi' t ■•. f' iPPl -V y> ■ ^ ^V;.-.. . ■t/^' • <5 1. ’^ P-t'J.-v,,. CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Enterprise Funds Combining Balance Sheet Asof December .11. 1991 (with Comparative Totals as of December .11,1990^ Assets Current isseu CHh and t«sparary hvestroenu A mou Ms receivable Accrued imeiest reccivaNe IMin^uenl special assessments receivable Defm^ special assessments, current portion Due from other Amds Due from other governmental units hvtNHory flfipiid items Total current assets Caah and iovtsttnents Accrued intefest receivable Total restricted assets leas current portion Dafrned special asscssmenu Due from other Auida Dtie from other gov ernmental uniu Diacoiml on icvcmK bonds Totri other assets PMpaiiy, plant, and equi hipiogtesB Land and land improvements Inlidhut «id buidiag mpruvements Pialribmiei^coUactioB system Lem accumulMid dspmciieion Total mm u...' Liii ' 'A Water Opcratii^ 161.115 1.751 15.205 1.154 725 1.118 181.490 722.877 J2.722 7l099 45.614 7.9<K.i 51.514 11.581 57. Ii: 77,694 .15.916 2.080.896 2.26.1.221 680.^ 1.582.169 Sewer Operating -75- Oolf Course Operating Totals 1991 1990 917.775 $ 5Q.725 S 1.1.18.615 S 927.077 195.259 •193.239 196.658 2.1.615 1,894 21.262 12,6.19 17,071 -17.071 17.693 26.511 -41.7.16 41.7.16 2.441 -.1.797 2.881 19.549 -20.274 19.323 —3.274 4.392 11.918 _137 1.17 5.822 ”l.'202 ’.245 65.0.10 1.448.763 1,2.15.953 776..192 1.499.269 1.742.120 12.499 -23.221 2..1.10 788.891 1.324.49C 1.744.450 79.591 .123.207 166.942 ---2.441 141.876 -.141J76 .16.1.719 7.716 -13.616 16.117 411.185 —484.^549.421 10.640 .22.22.1 943.1.1.1 127.977 183.109 15.1.109 11.014 40.778 149.486 149.4M 59.801 69.059 164.771 154.771 5.578.947 -8.6S9J4.1 7J77JU 6.6ta404 217.814 9.181.419 $,919,769 2.049.611 40.824 2.771JI07 2A05.9M 4i.ia?71 1M.990 6.4iai.12 6.17i801 » 7.03.1.094 t 9J6t.0t6 t 9.90^617mnmamsr^mKcaammB II I I I I I I I I I I I 't- ■ "y^'li''’ll!.: > UtbilHiet And Fund Equity liaMIMM .f. ■ M- CoMractt payable Salariatp^aM* Dwtooilwr fWtds DMi 10 Other govemuicntal units Dofcmd credits ife Tou* CWitnl liehilities Wfcv Chmnl ii^Mee poyaMc from restricted assets P'*% Ml poyeMc OpU mH payable m Mmmi intmat poyeMe Doflmed dtevelofiv advances Tmd current liabilities payable from restheted a.sscts liabttlltCt* less current portionpilf SI. ‘ ^'A^ ■py Revetiue hoods payable Accfued vacation and severance brnenu Duc«Boi»r ftindt DafawedCTediu Total kaifHemt Itabilittes .... Total liabilities I OoMributed ciq^ital mgs Itiaar sil for revenue bond dcN service UMatsrvad t otal retained earnings MMh ■‘1^! IP”: li®-:' lotai frmd equity Total tiahiiaies and frmd equay IB’ I W^' ...... Eahibit F-1 Water Sewer Golf Course Touls Operating Operating Curating 1991 1990 S .\712 $ .1.922 S 692 $ 8.126 S 6.771 -2.400 -2,400 — 1,780 2.419 1.414 5.651 .1.552 6.099 8.740 -14.8.19 8.021 7.416 .161 -7.799 9.518 —9.5.10 -9.5.10 9.5.10 19,027 27..174 2,146 4S..547 .17.416 1.2.M 2.804 4.055 8.5.18 11..122 --11.122 91.987 10.890 10.170 —61.060 61.061 69.72?20.077 89.800 89.800 111.186 51.051 166.217 251J88 U61.170 1.116.410 _2„mooo 7.642 11.718 6.01"25..197 1.1J77 ---2.44.1 —111.070 —111.070 140.600 i.i7ui:1.279.218 6.01“'2.4.5c.4C7 2,456.920 1.10.1.425 1.159.641 8.181 2.671.251 2.747.724 1.106.096 4.189.459 141.290 5.440.845 5,606.471 91.746 n 1.519 20.1.283 122.554 51.705 1.192.451 IOH.147 1.552.705 U26J78 i 4.1.4.51 1.501.9<>2 108.547 1.755.9W 1.549,412 1.249..547 5.691.451 251.817 7.196A15 7.155,901 ' *4 ’ * ru- ■.p ui S 7^011.094 i_mo^Q S 9.9ai.627 ?6 1 1 scaresP^''$^:-CITY OF I MINNESOrTA EilubiiF2Enterprise FundsCboMiiing StatemeiM of Revenue, Expenses, end Qiaofei in Retained FMniii|iYear Ended December 31, 1991 (with Comparative Totals for Year Ended December 31. 1990) liSiK.pill' Wk. »r' ■tei)«#s , |Bfi?liei$v m ' •• 'Pttv pilWy«i ■ : ;■ >: SiIm md coet of aln Sniea Coetof alee Orau profit f1|waf inf revenue Me te red water ules Ueer chnrfea GaensCDa Efui^mea PNrtal Totel qieratiof revenue Total from fm^t and operatinf revenue fWMHii MflPlOH Sidariea aai trages Maiicinca coaributiops HaHli and lih ributions. I SgfMMf ckftfffcs MMoiM arvioes OtamiiMi fliiyalefiai■MW MWMVw'iMU Hint, ttgjii, and posm Di|MClMiOB Wan and eq uipaMi supfdies *^s;f ■ spr'ur?:«. Aitahiinaihin mdodar cxpena AdminiaiaijN* charges IraaOaiaidFynd rnmmadrartoir Offteaaqpplfa yrimng» pnMiiiiing. and a^nrtliiag flMiiiW¥iiiiim iMMMCi QttKrcxpeaa I^Qlil €lpMltj||g tMftMn Optaiag income (loss) 4^ * Water 153,199 3,953 157,152 157.152 62,723 6,603 2,403 34,2 14 2.529 9,832 19,751 38.902 10,402 200.912 (43,760) Sewer Golf Course Totals •77. 3,783 3,783 3%,378 50.398 446,776 101,061 24,090 2,498 127,649 153,199 396,378 101,061 24.090 56,849 731,577 446,776 131.432 735360 94,766 53,027 210,516 9,807 4,807 21,217 3,604 2,782 8,789 --34314 165,475 -165,475 4,209 1.595 8333 3,516 4,995 18343 14,634 2.029 36,414 131,879 4,919 175,700 -5,766 5,766 22,709 7.217 40328 1,460 1,460 3.970 1.555 1,026 54 69 131 660 4.294 5,183 7,157 -10,364 12339 12,914 32.4W 1,285 1,073 2.759 475,109 107,973 mW (28333)23.459 (48.634) Operating Operating Operating 1991 1990 $ - $$ 15,846 12,063 $ 15,846 12,063 $ 17,801 9,973 7,828 159,289 401342 96.710 28,645 26,452 712,438 720366 165,309 18,143 7,352 42,066 162372 7377 18332 37306 175347 6328 50305 3,640 3379 438 23« a472 30^068 3,960 74^959 (22,693) (itariaBwl) :-si ■;j| "4.!' .P M .... V .I .....ExhibHF^ K A) <..v I f'/■'.' I I |iSr'-t.: k.'t ■ '.'V, ff tfe■!s«j f.-^’-v 'Vmf&. ’■ ■'•' »?. »t-' |p¥'"Sjv- .v'V ’. ®Pl!'ill*' I ft'-.' Kt ;>.w. » ' '' :.•■ -r i. vV IS!- W '■jV, ■■ I I &7, WW‘IIBPv I ■ .i--r ■'A- i'i'MI7^’- ■ «%s - r'V OTY OFORONO. MINNESOTA Entciprise Funds (continued) GaoMninf Stntemeni of Revenue, Expenses, and Qianges in Retained I Year Ended December 31,1991 (with Compantive Totals for Year Ended December 31, 1990) NoMpcmiai re^ umadoi iivettiiients taMWOC Iram Interfiind loans AwiliMlian of defened credits ei|Hnac on inlerfund loans Total noMperating (expense) Net income (loss) Oadh Cor dsfMciatiao on coniril haense (dKiease) in •eiaiaed earnings BighMiIai of year Emlaf year |r i^v' .«• ' --r;ipf ■m*. >-. V ■A Golf > Water Sewer Course Totals i Operatini Operating Operating 1991 1990 i i 7,365 12,851 2a216 j 70,326 128.171 2,942 201,439 138756 *15.192 —15,192 15,916 489 -489 733 11 -9.530 -9,530 9,530 1 (74,493)(72.755)-(147,248)(147,163)I (489)--(489)(733)I (2.031)(1.955)-(3,986)(1.180)J —-(798)(798)-1 _ 678 91.523 2,144 94,345 115,859 i (43,082)6.3,190 25,603 45,711 93,166 I 33,329 127,264 254 160,847 161,165 1 •i 'A (9.753)190,454 25,857 206,558 254.331 'll A4 153,204 1,313,538 82,690 1,549,432 1,295,101 ;■ $ 1,503,992 $ 108,547 $ 1,755.990 t 1J4«.4» ■r A hA 7': f 1 '-A ■' 'A. x-v P'] i ■'!;igl ss CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Enteiprite FundsConbininf SuiCfoeni of Cash Flows Year Ended December 31.199](wiih Comparative Touls for Year Ended December 31. 1990)EihibitF-3 iiPfc. Is,.,;!" MiMii flMwiiil MtMlica %mM ••MNnaaii cotteciad on Caab flows fton operating activities Oparatint income (loas) A^wlnMals to leconcile operMing Iwoaw (lom) to net eaali provided (taafl) bp operaiinf activMies Vaaalion and severance benefits Dapmciatinn Lnaa on sale of aaacu Amortiiatioo of rsveoue boitd discount MWCC cunent vahie credit principal and deferred credit (lacfeaae) decrease in Accounts rsceivabic Dslinqiiaai special assasanMots receivable Dm flan other fends IhM tom othsr govemmoiul units ImmMory Aapaid itsias iHMit (daoease) in Aceonaii payable Amounts pay^ > rcs&krted Qnnracts peyahie OsMracts payable > resinctcd Satariaa payabfe IhiaiooiisrftM^ I3ya to orber govmmnmtaJ uniu Net eaali provided (used) by opnaUng activhies OKlb flain feani noncifMia) financing Ktivities iMMnl mccivad on interfend loans Water Operating Sewer Operating Golf Course Operating Touls 1991 1990 S (43.760) S (28.333) $ 23.459 S (48.634) S (22.693) 4.364 38.902 7.101 131.879 346 (28.327) 1.399 622 (145) 4.919 798 11,520 173.700 798 701 (28.327) 1..199 622 (1.331)2.860 —1.329 (4.34)19.528 19,094 3.272 2.684 1.370 7.326 1,000 .3,601 1,084 5.685 1.664 (91)(20)1.553 (3.392)(1.091)-(4,483) 2.400 -2.400 (51.287)(31.378)-(82.665) 996 821 284 2.101 (676)5.466 (417)4J73 (2.036)297 -(1.739) (52.16.^)89.784 31.332 68.933 (489)489 ^gplWtian m conmuetion of cipdal asseu MWCC cumm vAia ertdit prineipel mdl_isinind credit Mice tmm vmm wmrm Maiiei peid on feveme bonds CMfeteiM on feveniis bonds Nat eeah used by ca^ «td fmam] financii^ sctivM»cs 22,570 .39..381 -61.951 (118.289)(94.327)(5.788)(218.404) -21.327 ...28J27 15.192 -15.192 (74,495)(71756)-(147051) (2.031)__iim -. om (172.245)(86,138)(5.788)(264,171) 2,761 175.347 ITS. 9.17 30500 (541J05) (577. GolfWaterSewerCourse TotalsOperaiinsOperatingOperating1991 57.379 104.211 2.335 163.925 260.374 X370.882)(808.375J (33.842)(1.213.099)S24..388 (313.503)(704.164)t31.507j (1.049.174)1.084.762 - --- - -.....- (538.400)(700.029)(5.963)(1.244.392)685.890 811.565 1.223.521 24.718 2.059.810 1.373.920 S 273.165 S 523.498 $ 18.755 S 815,418 »SS1 2,059.8J£ S 273.165 S 523.498 $ 18.755 S 815.418 S 2.059.810 610.847 1.17a&69 40.97v)1,822.486 —K||i i 884.012 L 59.725 $ 2.637.904 L 2.669.197 S 161.1.35 S 9l7.t75 S 59.725 S UMA35 t 927.077 niATJ 776..3M2 -1.499.269 1.742,120 $ 884,012 LW?4!41 S 2.637.904 L 2.669.197 -SK m: «if;:fiP ! .jb'- i ' n,\. ;■ : H^fer _';. .!#. • «p‘“ ' . WO'.:- smm. 'rt : -fe' - BlLi#» l^ili CITY OF ORONO, MINNESCXTA Water Operating Fund Comparative Balartce Sheet As of December 31. 1991 and 1990 Assets Cyncni assets Qtsh and temporary investments - operations Aocnied imotst receivable - operations Deferred special assessments, current ponion Due from other funds Due from odier giwcmmcntal units Im'tntory prepaid items Total current assets Hirkted assets Ouh and investments Debt service Construction Total cash and investments-restricted Accrued interest receivable Debt service Construction Total accrued inicrcsi receivable - restricted Total restricted assets Other assets Deferred special assessments Disocum on revenue bonds Tbol oiho asseu impcily, pfenl. and equiprnent in progress UAd and land improvcnicm^ iiilkihp. and taiilding improvements Etpiipmeai Dis yftaidotMDDlkciion system Let t aceumulated depredation No property, phmi. and cqutprocm X' i i^ets a- ?■■■ $ 11363 57.132 njm 35.916 2,m«96 680.S52 l.5«2Jn9 1991 1990 161.135 $ 131.245 1.753 204 15.205 15.205 1.354 23 725 291 1.318 4.390 —1.000 181.490 152.558 188.936 251.636 533,941 668.649 72l877 920:5«5 3.423 300 9.299 13)24 12“722 U24 735.599 921.609 45.614 60.819 7.900 8.255 53.514 693)74 446.^ 25.132 njm 34J52 1.559JAi “XliiM 641.^ 13^ I I I I I I y. JiilI I I I I I I..'I »■ I * I •aJ I ... i.^uJ ■- - ■ ■■ V.':pfSi^??!',-;S;‘^':i'--ir-'%^:' ffr' ■ -V. "^JL: u . ; .iv Liabilities and Fund Equity a»Kfil liaNUtics Aooountt piyable-operations Salaries piyahle Due to o4kt fimds Due to other govemmcmal units Total current liabiiiaes Qvrent liabilitio payable from restricted assets Aooounis pB)^le - omstruction Aooounlt payable - debt service Gontracts payable - revenue bend constructism Accrued interest payable - revenue bonds Deferred developer advances Tc^l current liabilities payable trom restricted assets L □nfttm liabilities, less current portion Revenue bonds payable Aociued vacMkin and severance benefits Due 10 other frmds Total long-term liabilities Total liabilities 1 equity CbiMriiuied capital Rctuned eanungs Reserved for revenue bond debt service Unraerved Total retained cvnings Toud ftmd equity Total liabilities and fund equity §2- ■‘Ifilfc:, U49,M7 Exhibit F-4 1991 1990 $ 3,712 $ 2,048 1.7g0 784 6,099 4332 7.436 9,472 19.027 16.636 1.161 4.643 90 — 11,322 62.609 30,890 30,892 69,723 69,723 113,186 167,867 1,163,570 1,163,570 7.642 3,078 —2,443 1.17U12 1,169.091 1.303,425 U53394 1.106.096 1.139,425 91.746 151321 51.705 1383 143.451 1^304 1,292A29 i i.j s i m '■m '1 -■ ;.v- ■ii ir rill I iTiria F.7»i-^ ^V -ry.Exhibit F-5CITV OF ORONO, MINNESOTA ii:. Wato^ Operating Fund Comparative Statonent of Revenue, Expensct, and Ohanget in Retained Earnings Years Ended December 31.1991 and 1990 tK..- i-.T /■*,-- • Wi &' Ky . operating revmnM Metered wamr sales Other Total q|>eraticg revenue Opmatiag espcBNi Salaries and eragcs Retirement contributions Hsahh and life insurance conUibutions Nrehased fsater fhdessional services Operating and maintenance sillies light, ad power DapreciaUa liidnieasnoa and repairs Adddnistradvc diarget from Oaeral Fund kalians liesm m Mating, publishing, and advertising ing ' ■ ■ ■ •' •*■.■ Ji|#v Total operating expenses Operating loss f!*: Not ^Mraling wwne (expense) btera incoMC m special assc Interest sasnad on investments OiMawicc yifet;'' dSon remac Revsnne Inwi expense Total aoooperadng revenue (expense) ; ny b:h Net loss On#l for depmrinlioH on confribiited equity lnocn» (decreme) in rctaii»d mmtngs v-S M hA'^ ■ m mm B^kningol year &dofymr w 5 -i} • * • 1991 1990 $ 153,199 $ 159,289 3,953 2476 157,152 161465 62,723 45,744 6,603 5,429 2,403 1.879 34,214 42,066 2,529 2,401 9,832 9.287 19,751 20432 38,902 38,797 10,402 23,141 1,050 1 II K423 1,227 8 47 229 93 3,207 2,548 *',235 5,648 401 2,429 200,912 202,068 (43.760)(40.5(B) 7,365 - 16,504 22491 7.869 9409 45,953 71.603 (489)(733) (74,493)(74,975) Jim __m 678 27404 (43,082)(13499) 33JI29 33429 (9.753)20.030 153404 133,174 t J43.431 % mj^ .•v‘II I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I 'Yym-■■'yt- kjy- y- Wr |fe ft. ,- V . Jr Sv ifc. !pft': if- _ii|p:■ft * 'i«r ^ Jip'.,■iiiis iiii#'" i r ^m‘. Hi#:--' l:iS-'" « ipij crrv OFORONO, Minnesota Water Operating Fund Gootpantive Statement of Cash Flows Years Ended December I, 1991 and 1990 Qtib flows bom operating activities Operating lots AdjltMhnenls to ircoocile operating loss to net cb A provided (used) hy operating activities Vacatioa and severance benefits Dapindraion Ai^bnlion of revenue buid discount in assets and liabilities (Incraase) decraase in Due bom other funds Due from other goveminentai units hventory Piepaid items Inciease (decrease) in Accounts payable Accounts payable ~ restricted Contracts payable - restricu.*d Salaries payable Due to other funds Due toother governmental units Net cash provided (used) by operating activiti^ Odh flows from noncapital financing activities Interest (paid) on inierfund loan Odh flows boni capital and related financing activities Spncial aasasnents collected for revenue bund debt Acfuisilion or construct ion of capiul assets Istiitil paid on revenue bonds Olhiv charges on revenue bonds Net cndi used by coital and reland (inaaring activities Ouh flows bant htvuUng activities hdHtsi inccived on tevesiments Nat sales ^uechasss) of tenporary iavedments f^t cash provkkd (used) by Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash «)uivalents iigiaidai of yor Mofynar ryin !ina v\ ■ "ft - TolM <»ih and temporary iiiveAffieMs ^14. • ■ Exhibit 1991 1990 S (43.760)$ (40,503) 4.564 922 38.902 38.797 355 310 (1.331)(23) (434)302 3.272 3,457 1.000 (91) 1.664 (626) (3.392)(3.085) (51.287)36,975 996 (124) (676)(554) „ 12^(2.238) (52,163)33,519 (489)(733) 22,570 29.250 (118,289)(334,060) (74.495)(65,707) (2,031)(591) (172.245)(371,108) 57.379 113,287 (370,882'411,984 (313,5») (5.38.400)186,949 811,565 62A616 t mA^ % ilUtf S 27^,163 $ Sll^ 610.847 m965 crry of orono. Minnesota gg/* . ^ .1‘ V':fee', iw; %e ^ Sewer Operating Fund Comparative Balance Sheet As of December 31,1991 and 1990 Assets v^: PW' ___ 1-V' • CyffcMatieU dahindtcnqxxary investments-operations ABOountt receivable Accrued inicrett receivable - operations DeliiK|ucnl special assessments receivable Deferred special assessments, current portion Due from other funds Due from other governmental units Inventory Pre^ items Total current assets llMifciedasMis Qtfh md investments DeN service CbnstriK ion Total cash and investments - restricted ■esM «ter - ■ Aocnied huerest receivable Debt service ODOSCruction Toed accrued interest receivable - rcstriaed Total restricted assets liliK':, pspfS*' Ottl9 isictk, Ims cuncm portion Dtfrmd spedai assessments Due from other hinds Due from other govemmaital units ml on revenue bonds Total other assets mm If#i#' fbopoty. piMi, and equipment TM in pRigrms BuOdifigl and building improvements Bqtdpmcm DMbutfoAtaoitecsion system m Uss aocumubted depreciation Net prepmy, plant, and equipment Tbtal assets 158,810 431,185 10,640 31,014 59,803 6.578.947 6.68Q.404 2.049,631 1991 1990 S 917.775 $ 763,986 195,259 196,658 23.615 11,148 17,073 17,695 26,531 26.531 2,443 2.860 19,549 19,234 —2.684 —3,601 1,202,245 1.044,397 221,188 480.347 496.627 31.014 53.156 64)18.020 6.598.817 1.923.715 4.630,773 4.673.102 %imML II I I I ' 617,582 600,647 ml 776,392 821,835 p 2,976 293 9.523 713 ■i 12.4W 1.006 V- 788,891 822.841 •- - . n; 79.593 106,123 A -2.443 i 343.876 363,719 *' V 7,716 8,062 i|; I I I ■5^m I I i pv ■-■ tM^ ' \ ILte;#!|p '■v»,. Kp''»’'i'. ■■ '• I m-;- ■ •\ ■■ ■;< p.. li ■';>5';'s'' ■■ '■:' is*-- ■ I Liabilities and Fund Equity Cuncnt liaMlitics Aooounts payable *- operations Coittacts payable - operations Salaries pa)^le Due to other binds Due to other fovemmental units Deferred credits Total current liabilities CUmnl liabilities payabie from restricted assets Aeoounts pay^ie ~ construction AooouMs payiible - debt service Cbniiacit payable - revenue bond construction Accrued interest payable •> revenue Kinds Deferred developer advances Total current liabilities payable from restriacd assets Long-ierm liabilities, less current portion Revenue bonds payable Accrued vacation and severance benetits Deferred crethts Total lon^erm liabilities Total liabilities tod equity Oontribuied capital Retained canings Reacnmi for revenue t UhstKrved Total retained earnings xldeN service Toiri fund equity Toral liabilities and fund equity iffc K - ^ ■ ............... 16- $ 5,693,451 $ 7,053A)94 Exhibit F>7 1991 1990 3.922 $ 4.013 2.400 — 2,419 1,598 8,740 3,274 363 66 9,530 9,530 27.374 18,481 2,717 3,895 87 - —31,378 30,170 30,171 20,077 20.077 53,051 85,521 1.136.430 1,136,430 11,718 4,617 131,070 140,600 1.279,218 1,281,64> 1.359.643 1,385,649 4,189.459 4,321,500 111.539 171033 1,392,453 1,142005 1.503,992 1013*538 5,635.Q3d $ 7.020*687 a::s!rr,' i 1 i .•t % S .196,378 $ 401342 6,620 5,051 43,778 17,199 446,776 423392 94,766 68,906 9,807 8,196 3,604 2,931 16.5,475 162372 4,209 3,486 .3,516 4363 14,6.34 14,737 131,87^1.32,086 22.709 19,451 1,460 1380 1,555 1,116 54 88 660 156 7.1.57 5,924 12,339 11,751 1,285 723 47.5,109 4^066 (28,333) (14,474) 12,851 - 14,161 20,171 66,817 56,627 47,193 57,429 15,192 15,916 489 733 (72,755)(72.188) (l.«55)089) 9,530 91530 91,523 i7.629 63,190 73,155 127,264 1273« 19(t454 200,737 1,313,538 1,112.101 r 4':||fe - ■E;- ',: ' .Errin’!: . ■ - Mm, ■ mW'r- ■, ’■; CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTASewer Operating Fund Cbmparative Slalement of Cash Flows Years Ended December 31.1991 and 1990 CMi flows from opMiting activities Opantiag loM Ail^iiilMMlsloftoanctle openting loss to net CMh ptovblSM oy operating activities Vacation and aeveraaoe beneflts Depfsdtfkm Aaoftiiaiioa of levroue bond discount MWOCcwncai value credit principal and deferred credit hi asmis and liabilities (laacaae) decrease in Acc^u receivable DeUnquent special assesnnents receivable Due bomo^r funds Dne bon other governmental units Inventory Prepaid items bcreaae (decrease) in AccoMds payable AecounU payable - restricted Contiactt payable GonttacttpayaMe - restricted Salaiisepay^ Due toother finds Due to otter governmental units Net cash provided by operating activities CiMh flowi bon noncapital financing activity lilBraat ineaived on inlmfiwd loans I flom bom afitil and related flaancmg activities IjMl lal iiaii—irnti rrrlfT^^ for revenue Inad debt AcfnWiian or construction of capital eseets jgWQCcuiiini value cradh principal and deterred credit IfWOCcnmnl vnlns cardN fanarest dargas on mvcmie bonds Net catt umd by capital and rebited financing activities Exhibit F9 1991 1990 $ (28.333) $(14,474) 7,101 131,879 132,086 346 303 (28,327)(27,604) 1.399 1.749 622 (1,922) 2,860 3,244 19,528 18,053 ,684 2.945 3,601 9,842 (91)1,135 (1.091)(9.896) 2,400 — (31.378)(11,490) 821 68 5.466 2,721 297 (270) 89.784 107,in 489 733 39,381 21,250 (94,327)(199,827) 28,327 27,604 15,192 15.916 (72,756)(63,137) - (589) (86,138)(198.783) (conttamd) EihibitF9CTIY OFORONO, MINNESOTASewer Operating Fund (continued) Comparative Statement of C]ash Rows Years l^dcd December 31,1991 and 1990 Gub flows flam taivestiDg activities hterest iweived on investments Net «les (pwchnaes) of ten^xxary investments Net cash provided (used) by investing activities Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Gash and cash equivalents Beginning year End of year Ghih and cadi equivalents dher iMiponuy inveMments Total cash and temporary tn\ I'stments 1991 1990 104,211 146,005 (808,375)419,532 (704,164)565,537 (700,029)475,360 1,223,527 748,167 $ 523,498 $ 1.223.527 S 523,498 $ 1,223,527 1,170,669 362,294 $ 1.694.167 $ 1.585.821 NoMMh opeiMiag items During the year ended Deoen^r 31. 1991, a piece of contributed equity equi|nnent was dei equipnicnl had an adjusted basis remaining of $4,777 ut the time i was demolished. lished. This OonirilMlMletpiily eqt^pm Coal Accumulated depreciation S 12.740 7,963 Loss on contributed equity equipment • ArvJII I i'^r I If r. H- *’ “ • • -(S'; fc , sIm: fef-* '*i s I I I Oii.-i-'f'' »'■ h. I CIL< \-: .1 I. |......I •' rI I m-fw «■:•< if/ • fr^'" ■ • ,1Wrail "■ ■ ■ ■“■»> I fepw ..■/':■■•■ CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Golf Course Operating Fund Comparative folatKe Sheet As of December 31.1991 ami 1990 Assets Current assets Cash and temporary investments Accrued interest receivable Invcfiioiy Prepaid items Total current assets Pn^xrty, plant, and equipmem Land and land improvements Buildings and building imprtwements Equipment Less accumulated depreciation Net property, plant, and equipment Total assets Liabilities and Fund Equity Current lu^ilities Accounts payUhle Salaries payable Due 10 other (Unds Total current liabilities g4ciin liabilities Aocnied vaottion and severance benefits Total liabilities Bind equity QDMrftKted capital Rcadncd camiti|s Total fUnd equity Tool ikbilHics and fund equity 1 Exhibit F-10 1991 \9^ S 59,725 $ 31.846 1,894 1,287 3.274 4.644 137 1,221 65.030 38.998 127.977 127.977 40.778 40.778 69,059 67,265 237.814 236,020 40.824 38,301 1%,990 197,719 $ 262,020 $ 236,717 $ 692 $ 712 1.454 1,170 —417 2,146 2.299 6.037 6,182 8.183 8,481 143J90 145 J46 106.547 82.690 253.137 S 262.020 S 236.717 i I ■< tiiia'riaiiniiaaihi a-irr •- m i TT-- lifei «ft* Sfrmi ?«■:'■ m' - Fif' .^i' ‘ Jin:.-.nn |i. " .. .'• / ; ;v • iltf'i,. ■ ■ i^n?;.*:, . •■‘I ■:*■ ? ■ U‘:- iV^‘ si:i;;. im . :if\ if' -Si#' Exhibit F-11OTV OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Golf Course Operating Fund Cooiparative Stnlcment of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes in Retained Ewings Years Ended December 31. 1991 and 1990 Saks and cost of sales Saks Goal of sales Gross profit Olwaliilf revenue Oaeasfecs Bqu^eat rental Other Total operating revenue Total gross profit and q>crating revenue Openihig expenses Salaries and wages Wmiriwfnt oontributioos Hsidlh and life insurance contributions OgwsiiBf and maintenance supplies tknl, light, and power Dappsckiion Rani and equipment Adndnialralive charges from General Fund Office supplies Mnling. pibUshing, and advertising Total operating exp Opemting income Nonoperating rmranne (expense) LoMon sale of eqnipmeal Total nonoperming revalue (expoise) Natincame for tkprecktion on contribmed equity A ^ m M flings Rmtoed enmis^ ieghming of you Mol you lamtim-’M.mm 23,837 82,090 S I08J47iananaSsto&Mfen 1991 1990 $ 15,846 $17,801 12,063 9,973 3,783 7,828 101,061 96,710 24.090 28.645 2.498 1,926 127.649 127,281 lil.432 135,109 53,027 50,659 4,807 4,518 2.782 2,542 1.595 U90 4,995 4,482 2,029 2,137 4,919 4,464 5,766 6,328 7,217 7,673 1,460 1,260 1,026 1^36 69 303 4,294 2,356 12.914 12,669 1,073 808 107,973 102,8^ 23.459 32,284 (798) 2.942 1,026 2,144 1,026 25.603 33.310 254 254 3I38« 49,126 imk II I I I I I I I I II I I I * 51 I'/i' I I I I rnMrtfti R;;r Xi ? ■ V>».irIL"H-1 I ?m.e;:v:<;pifo: m- *■ fc-itI IM- I ^^..t t : I ‘f #1' V Sive;- I ro I I 'W T.- iiiv '-ifk ^::i. I U|i: ,r'~\:^. -y. ■m ■ y-tpm- crrv OF ORONO, Minnesota Golf Goune Opeiatiog Fuad 0»i|Mnitive Stoleaient of Cksb Rows Yean Ended December 31,1991 and 1990 Chib flowi Iran opcntiag activities Opnatiiif incoaw Ailtlitaieatt to nooncile operating income to ■et cash provkhd by operating activities Vacatkm and »vtnnce henefiu Dcpeacialiai Loss OB ale of equIpaKat Chaofe hi aaats and liabilities lease) dsoeaK in Inventory Psqiaid items ise (decrease) in Accounts payable Salaries payable Due to other funds Net caA provided by operating activities Chril flows from capital and lebted financing activities A(6(piisition of capital assets €Ml flows from investing activities hneiest received on investments Net piHchnses of temporary investments Net cash used by investing activities Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Qnb and CMb a^uivnlcnis ■igilaiiBi of year fhidof year CM and cash Iflhfslenti ObarlMptnary investmenu Total cash and temporary hivestinems Mmwb npiratiai items Exhibit IM2 1991 (145) 4,919 798 1,370 1,084 (20) 284 (417) 31,332 (5,788) 2,335 (33,842) (51 >507) (5.963) 24,718 1990 $ -t3.459 $ 32,284 456 4,464 65 (200) 117 (58) 417 37J45 (7.918) 1,082 (6,046) 23J81 1,137 S 18,755 S ^,718 $ 18,755 S 24.718 40,970 7,128 S 59.725 I 3L846 Durtag the y»r ended December 31, 1991, the Oty traded ui rquipment with aa ad^usied booh value of S800. CMginal price liMi AdluabdhiKdt value S 3.994 2,396 \jm Loss on sail of equipme ni % m 92- I i lUies iSiaulsaiaii ■t I tel;:LrW.' ■ -' .r- ^m: ill- lit I mm-' mw*: ■■- _v";--:'>\-- I l,;-S!j»- ■ (•'Ki^r-s H. *; TRUST AND AGENCY FUNDS f Tnut Funds are used to account for assets held by the City in a trustee capacity Finttrilc Benefit Plan Fund - used to account for employee participation in the cafeteria plan creMed in acoocdnce wHh Internal Revenue Code Section 12S. Afincy Funds are used to account for assets held by the City ofgaidtaiions, other fovemntental units, or other funds. Deferred Compoisation Agency Funds, ICMA Fimd, Mliuicsota Suppicmattal Invcetmcnt Fund, Grwt Weal life Insurance Company Fimd, and USCM/reiSCO Fund • used to account for employee deferred compensation plans created in accordance ^ith Internal Revmie Code Section 457. ■i • •• I I .-9J a.A- ' ‘TTT’ ' r^:ta- : ■ ■ >-‘Mh vim ■ ’-kt-mvi- , 3^^*/ -■ r- ;f •/■ M .r-'jlr.iv:. • :v., W/''f f ('%■■. ili'; vSx':. '■ ‘ wS' .m ’■,i'W V<>- ■• m-m. •ixhibit G~1 CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Fiduciary Fund Type - Expendable Trust and Agency Funds Combining Balance Shet't Asof Decen^r 31,1991 (with Comparative Totals as of December 31.1990) Expendable Trust Rexible Benefit Plan j^enejr Deterred Totals Compensation Funds 1991 1990 Assets Assets held by deferred nsati^ plan trustees S 345JW $ 34 5.199 S 297,761 Lii^ilitics and Fund Equity liabilities DefcfTcd compensation payable to employees S S 345.199 $ 345.199 $ 297.761 Bind equity FdfxJ balance Unreserved - imdesignated Total liabilities and tuncj equity $ -S $ 34 5,199 $ 297,761 g£: & .iSffiiLSv ::V.:Si •v; ^ -V yr-r^f IT*;'aII■ t: I I 4 I I I I I I I Ii I I I I I I— iJ ■dilUi: ' -,.y ’• - *II ‘‘Sf-;y |f-H I Ir' jf'k jk' ■ wV• ' ;*;•. >;i •■ > %■h Iftc^ r ,f ifW If ,». Exhibit Cr2CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Flexible Benefit Plan Expendable Trust Fund Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Years Eruled December 31,1991 and 1990 1991 1990 Revenue Fiyroll withholdings for Flexible Benefit Plan $ 53,391 Bqicnditures Employee benefits 53,391 Excess of revoHie over expenditures Fund balance Beginning of year Bndofy $ I*. H ii SfS’.’W: •y>* '■ S’m JiSkgik "1 I a ■M CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Agency Funds Combiiiiog Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities Year Ended December 31,1991 ,p- a red Comentntion Agency Find flCMA) feAM'- &■ Assets Amis Md by deferred compeast !go plan trustees «'-y :;-*mmin® ■mmISi; UnbUities Dilened oonpeasatioa payable to employees Mmm.iipS"" 1 t : J i filiMiatal lavetf eat Faadl ioa Aaeaev Feed fMiaacsota Assets AsMIi held by deferred compensation plan trustees Liabilities Ddanad caaspeasalioa payable to employees . . - LI Coaipeasatioa Ateacy Pbad ^Owat Watt Ufa laearagce Cowpaay) Assets bdd by deferred cnmpaMtion plan trustees Drfhnadeo UabiUties taaloo payable to employees r®. S?S--' Balance January 1, 1991 Additions Deductions S 58,014 S 26.662 S, %- 63 S 58,014 S 26,662 $ $ 3.013 $ 3J79 $ S 3,013 S 3,179 $ $ 236,734 S 59.703 S 42,3 22 Exhibit G-3 Balance December 31, 1991 $ 84^613 $ 84,613 $ ^192 S 6.192 I 254,115 $ 236,734 S 59,703 $ 42,322 t 254,115 (contintHDd) II I I I I I I -1 I I I I I I I I I I I »v.i . >:^v,EiUMtG^CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTAI 1^-I Agency Funds (continued) Combining Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities Year Ended December ^1,1991 V .•■«• ItIr- A-'p Balance January 1 , 1991 Additions Deductions Balance December 31, 1991 . . I i , i; ffa» AtnacY Pbnd ffiSSQL ITTLi I are-i. ;; ; 4 .1; ■ II?-: r II .Ift ■pimr Assets Asms held by deferred compensation plan trustees Liabilities Deferred compensation payable to employees $$279 $279 $$279 $!____279 All Awev P>i»dl ' k- I V >:v . Assets Assfli held by deferred compensation plan trustees Liabilities S 297.761 S 89,823 $ 42,385 S 34S.I99 |L... tamed compensation payri>te to employees sP*'" S 297.761 1 89,823 , w I ■ iU. ■■■ ■ I I i!*- ■■! >1 ■■WJf 'll ipfv. p IPm-- ■^r . .p . • ■■ y .,. '■■I ,"• ' -:r . m"' WmI1''’^ ■ >i‘i|'5' ¥ ;r E. y- h mm -97 r : ^ A., :i •J i j I i f pf ; •i 4 idamnsiadl^ I .■^^ ' ^■\.4~I®'"H-iIP *P ■fe*» 'I '%'.,, ':!nf''.<'' . mi |-*1. 4 ,Vm hii •.ft* If'Pi' m ■- ^r[N*W-mm . r Af ,41 ■• ■•,. Biwy. it* r’- FINANCIAL SCHEDULES I -S .i i' >::. ,.V:4 i' ~'il|:. i- Kyims^vimm wgAfS' #Sf eiigl W- II® 1 ■ Schedule 1C1TYOFORONO.MIN TA Comparative Schedule of General Fixed Assets by Source December 31,1991 1991 1990 Ocmial fixed asieu Lmd and buid improvements BuHdbui and building improvements Equipment $ 623,358 145,958 %1,770 Total general fixed assets Investment in gcnenl fixed assets by source General Rndaftcr December 31,1984 Special Revenue Funds afta December 31.1984 Domtions after December 31,1984 Oqiiital Itaiiect Funds after December 31.1990 Yean prior to lanuary 1,1985 Total investmem in genoal fixed assets ■mmm 4• 4m "P- ’ •■S': -v > $ 433,438 145,958 %5,315 $ 1,731,086 $ 1.544.711 S 90.351 $ 121,526 469,538 441,908 4,025 4,025 189,920 — 977.252 977,252 $ 1,731,086 S 1.544.711 I 1 I I I I I -ii- IV:!: .'i I I ‘1 I I 1 I A r. I r.-’f I I I ■ i I I I r; .'>,:m-f'-i" ; rv->,. ^I I A':-. 9^ I* ■ I ■ m-II: m:' ij: '-9 ' liffflip-:life. »l|^‘'•'!' ^ I. ii f^-}; H^' Mm' wIyi-# ■-iif *■■^ ■ If Schedule 2ary cr ORONO, MiNNEsarA Schedule of General Fixed Assets By Function and Activity December 31,1991 Function and Activity Land and Buildings Land and Building Improvements Improvements Equipment Total dcnoal fovenment Ooincil Ateinittration Etodioiii Anaasiitg Finance Oovemm e nt buildings Total general government PtMic safety h^ice ftmeciive inspection and zoning Bnergency prepveckiess Animal control Total pdblic safety Greets Ms Otter-undassilied Total general fixed assets •99 $$ 5,000 $ 3,869 $ 8,869 ——17,985 17,985 ——24,476 24,476 ——2,695 2,695 ——21,493 21,493 189,920 104,059 35,432 329,411 189,920 109.059 105,950 404,929 233,131 233,131 —42.479 42,479 ——29,155 29,155 ——7,828 7.828 ~-312,593 3124^93 —10,000 489,063 499,063 105,389 1,899 54,164 161.452 328.049 25,000 353,049 $ 623,358 $ 145,958 $ 961.770 S 1.731.086 f2 1 iA V J .’•vJ Ki * % . ..i n :X4 ?r. V r%' 1 ’•A' ^.: dry OF ORONO, Minnesota Schedule of Changes in General Fixed Assets By Function and Activity Year Ended December 31.1991 Function and Activity Gcnenl fpvemment Ooinctl Adminiioation Bectiom Aisctsing Ftenoe Oovemmcnt buildings Total gencfal government PUMiciafety Mice fkoiective inspection anc or Bneiyency pitpifcdtess Animal omifDl Total public »fety s' ' P ^ ' O < I • w Otbcr-undaisificd Total general fixed assets General Fixed Assets -100- Schcdulc 3 General Fixed Assets January 1,December 31 1991 Additions Deletions 1991 $ 8,868 $$$ 8,868 17,838 147 —17,985 24,476 —-24,476 2.695 —-2.695 21.493 —-21.493 139,492 189,920 -329.412 214,862 190,067 ••404,m 264.306 7J91 38.466 233,131 41,662 817 —42.479 29.155 ——29,155 7,828 —7,828 342,951 " 8.108 38,466 312,593 4*72.840 33.315 7.092 499.063 161.009 10,215 9.772 161,452 353,049 --353,049 $ 1.544.711 $ 241,705 $ 55^130 $ 1,731.086 1 •'9 I Piftir»I k:*‘ fe. i‘?‘ I ;::■ a I ■■" !'■, ^■: •r-' ^-• ■t ' .V ■ I I t/'' ■ '. f; .» ^ -,■■ ?•'V ■ isf^.■ fo' .*^4^ ft Ifel" •• '• ■ ’•i* •■ ^Tr U I ■Ife?>’ ^i/r J^.- m # ':1'« "Ail"t- Schedule 4crry OF ORONO, MINNl SCI#. Future Property Tax Levies to Retire Bonds (1) As of December 31,1991 Yew Cbllectible 1980 Improvement Bonds 1982 Improvement Bonds 1985 Improvement Bonds 1991 Public Facilities Revenue Bonds Total Levies 1992 $ 16,800 (2)$ 5.500(3)$ 50,030(4)$ 232.400 (5)$ 3(M.700 1993 16,100 —50,000 —66,100 1994 15,300 400 50,000 -65,700 1993 14,400 1,200 50,000 -65,600 1996 —700 50,000 —50,700 1997 600 50,000 -50.600 1998 —500 50.000 -50,500 1999 ——50.000 —50.000 —50,000 —50,000 $62,600 $ 8,900 $ 450,000 $ 232,400 $ 753,900 The levlei for these issues are the general obligation property tax levies which we in addition to the amounts levied in the special assessment rolls. Tax levies are piaoed (as reqidred by law) w 103% of debt service requirements. (2) The Qty levied $16300 as scheduled to finance the retirement of improvemem Bonds bom die 1980 issiK. The Qty may cancel future levies if dK respeaive Debt Service Funds have wdBdcnt sources to pay ftiture debt requiremems. ($)1he Oly levied $5,500 for the 1982 Improvement Bonth due lo a projected short&il prior to 1994, The Qty will oontimie to raoniiar the issue and levy additional taxes as required lo gfneme luffictm souroes to pay hiture debt requirements. The Qly kvM $50300 Ibr the 1M5 Improvement Bonds due u> the assettacm appeals and idbiaqurnf reductions of dtfisned asacswMiKs. In 1988. the City cscaNisbed Mure taxes to gstemie sufRcksu souroes to pay Mure debt requirements as required by law. (5) The Qty levied $212,400 fur the 1991 PuNk facilities Revenue Bonds M the 1992 lease-purchase payments. The appropriation for the levy is made annually and is amkipmBd to com ■pprotlmwrly 55% of the lease-purchase paymerx. 101- J i .1 -1-' .» V Ir-i' •• 4 , ' 1m'%mf- -V*ISvi'r f V- f • •s- • '•■ f# Si'- rh- K m^m^ a‘^:v,f r pi^S- ^i, ■ .;,tSi ^ 'IR' ■s#.- f- S"v i^-- '■'■■-? ;^- . y'-' Mh'^ ®S®-SV'.' '*■■ - ■ giiipv'^' w$m^■.V. ist'.s ^ -IS' S^-'sm: • :fptamm :'S||,; ■ '■■■' ^'■ }^:n :p^V^v.f S-.‘ff ^ - • :>A.?^iil-''iK;y .-V'-' /^''- -/5p STATISTICAL SE ft/NAUDITBDQ •flit ■ .^-.. --^------------ , il—; : J-^.iVtJ.'.'i-.i.K- ■ r-... "I i 'U :(■: lifts* ■ >-■ ' Si" pr »P‘.if#fsIlf. Sips'. SilifeK : 'Li -t '' Iliir ■:x Z '.• ? t|@;p Ip,- llUt-: ■■ ^ ■ x : i... Mzx M-z %»■ s r!^..- ■-. .--*i» r Iliiifc Fiscil Year Oeneral Property Tax 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 $ 618.153 784.942 892.415 891.422 988.547 1.106.603 1.170.411 1.211,541 1.637.643 1.682.260 CriY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA General Revenue by Source (1) Licenses and Permits $ 46.993 71.243 102,958 102.811 102.533 136.420 124.334 148.564 136.552 81.202 Intergovernmental Revenue $ 524.041 503.122 454.795 453.488 525.735 499.864 48^^.319 493.385 135.51: 178.901 Charges for Currem Services $ 339.924 376.032 438,643 473,850 '>5.002 594.424 643.151 685.952 758.369 726.118 (1) bidudcs General. Special Revenue, and Debt Service Funds. Fines and Penalties $ 33.239 37.518 46,400 61,611 84,877 102.058 140,657 125.357 108,231 72.728 (2) Ri^lccts the Kkiption of Oovcmroental Ac^^unting Standurds Board Statement No. 6, dtn^wlfait Spt^uU Asietsmcnl Fond Type. Debt Service Fundi wtn wttirHihfd to anaauM fcv fcneial oNiption debt prcvkatsly recorded in Special Aasessmcni Pundk 102- mMmL. ,-yfII .>1I I I I I I 3 I 3 I ■ '1 I sI -I ■ZfiiI4 I I I ;3 I I im irfTf'irn iViiigirtifi^ i ii'niilti liitu t >.-aV. ^i|f, I r-.'. ■ . Ji-- '• 'y m' :^i ••-rW i«. |p‘v Wr!a. ’ • ;c" if":/’- - PI' 0, W' ■fSi, m.. |B‘-’ f/’k I uy S; ■ fek- t 'kv'-'v '• ■- ^".4f-.;: ?- ■ ;3%:- Mr.h is<;*:• •*' nMi «ssfc-' li-ft-/'rifilfeHk 's: A Special Astosmcnts and Miioellaneous 263.030 198.147 267.437 257.624 1.028.474 717.467 706.247 676,838 637.446 304.819 ........,, ................. Table 1 Total $ 1,825.380 1.971,004 2.202.648 2.240.806 3.335.168 3.156.836 3,274.119 3,341.637 3,413.753 3.246.028 103 ---->1^ ■B 4 r ■'.r MBffl 1C«2 $ 346,340 $ 715.2-1 > ' ^ ..0(i5 $ 28.810 S 114.225 1983 384.577 835.149 326.183 30.628 49367 1984 473.835 884,7o5 372.865 44.546 37,315 1985 408.354 946.828 306.479 43.659 38,949 1986 (2)458.631 1,089.627 461.855 46.656 126,389 1987 535.558 1.187,328 385.422 94.114 63,154 1988 589,137 1.247.623 344.407 61,582 67.160 1989 655.987 1.37t>.323 494.742 32.%1 95,164 1990 683.176 1.419.419 471.420 48.129 106,778 1991 652,105 1.508.4S5 474.350 44.791 165328 ■.Si,::;,: %imm i-.r- ■ ' Pfl'^ l®l^- mm^ S' » ■fe-' iiW;- fev p%«B'I*' ■f ....: ill.# Scfvice Oittlay Total S 42J63 $ 5,016 $ 1.565,000 40.780 55,295 1,721,979 44.10S 71,123 1,928.554 42.241 107,698 1,894,208 743,450 95.240 3.021.848 678.773 70,614 3,014,963 534.876 92.198 2,936.983 475.520 131,437 3.262,134 426.393 259,921 3.415,236 406.266 46,147 3.297.372 -;ISSv ,■ '-v<imm IP ■.;7:g i ,1 ■ ■i-:4 ■M. "iM d ,1 Im '■-M „,ag|^ •'m:';7 :.m ^<7>i ■ M ■■-' ■■ ;t'., ;' 5 -■•I"P ,'i M -7p'4j: Prvliigil' \^mtmm-MSm k- e» 'WM'M:- «$e-pp- PIm IB-- ■' . »«; fc: mk'. i'iH iiiil r-j./'V? '¥-Vpfi -Jii liR.pli:'r'3s;. Fiscal Year Collected Certified Tax Levy for Fiscal Period enr CP (MONO, Minnesota Property Tax Levies and Collections Current Tax Cdlections Percent of Levy Collect^ •!0(> Delinquent Tax Collections Total Cblicctions asaPeroent ofOvrent Levy 94.1 %$ 16,017 96.0 95.9 25.974 98.6 94.9 27,131 97.5 96.7 36.949 100.3 97.4 36.316 100.7 97.7 28.478 100.0 97.2 27,998 99.4 96.4 30,844 98.6 96.4 41,984 99.0 95.6 37.233 97.8 •P : Ai L- Hr JP %T r * > T1% TiTKo: •^rTTT •mmaa i:M F-*' m. .Mi¥' ■ f-;^' f. ?S \m vW^-- (if •'^ ■ »‘'vi ■’fcs' >i;t?r pr|l. W11 n W'^fm'''Jy-- , -v:. PI cnr OF ORONO. Minnesota Assessed Value or Tax Capacity and Estimated Market Value of Taxable ftoperty (1) *nuKt fliyible Real Property Assessed Value or Estimated Market _ Personal Property___ Assessed Estimated Value or Market Fiscal Disparities Adjustment to Assessed Value or Year Thx Capacity Value Tax Capacity Value Tax Capacity 1982 $ 78,477346 $ 306,471308 $ 1,180.049 $ 2,744.300 1983 88,720,487 343,8%,620 1,231,262 2.863.400 180.888 1984 93,709375 357.904300 1,355.446 3,152.200 135.293 1985 100,314376 383,130.000 1,430.696 3.327.2fK)331,361 1986 98,788,864 385.901.800 1.542.969 3.588.500 446.042 1987 101,291,782 402.8%,400 1.678,677 3.903.900 581,055 1988 105,021313 431,023,100 1.596,719 3,713.300 796.738 1989 (2) 14.049,094 477.834380 183.499 3.495.200 119,216 1990 12,568353 527,348.000 172.131 3.401.800 151,730 1991 14,035,873 585,697300 178.110 3.598.200 164.776 (1) All propeily, assessed, ax capacity, and estimated market values, and fiscal (ksparities ad^jSQMnt are from the Herman Coumy A^sessi^v (2) Bc|fnidng with lues payi^ble in 1989, the anminolofy fee Assessed Valuations and Milt Maio is no longer Tax Capacity replK» Assosed Valuttions and is deteimined in the sane nannrr except using smaller percentages frv each property class -lOi- I'iI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Total Tax Capacity Per Capita Valuations Assessed Estimated to Total Assessed Esomated Value or Market Estimated Value or Marke« IktCi^Mcity Value Market Value Tax Capacity Value 1 79.735,485 S 309,215308 25.79 %$ 11,691 $ 45,340 90.132,637 346,760.020 25.99 13.216 50.845 95.200.114 361.056300 26.37 13,959 52.941 102.076A33 386,457300 26.41 14.541 55.051 100,777.875 389,490300 25.87 1 ',052 54,307 103,551.514 406.800300 25.46 14.358 56.406 107.414A70 434,736.400 24.71 14.747 59,684 14451A09 481329.780 2.9K 1,945 65330 12.892^14 530.749,800 2.43 1.787 73,58^ 14378.759 589.295,500 2 44 1.969 8C.692 ■■*: . ?. ' ft, ^'. ■ '! ■ ■;:If ■';> >■-•■ ify m ' PSf. :■ ' a: . 'T-- It.;. y^<- t' r im-- Is,;S*,H tfeG.i* '.j^ ;pM iM^r ..i^- ■-V ^1# CITV OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Property Tax Rales-Direct and Overlapping Governments (1) (Per $1,000 of Assessed Value or Tax Capacity) City of Orono Ttoet Riyable Year General Fund 1985 Debt Service Fund 1966-1976 Debt Service Fund 1980 Debt Service Fund 1982 Debt Service Fund Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Total 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 10.26 10.09 10.74 9.78 10.83 11.68 11.76 9.42 12.36 11.43 0.33 0.29 0.27 0.22 0.20 0.19 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.39 0.28 0.21 0.27 0.28 0.14 0.12 0.04 10.83 10.60 11.22 9.78 10.83 12.07 12.04 9.63 12.77 11.87 (1) Certain areas of the City are ser^'ed by other school districts. Property in those areas would be subject 10 one of the following rates instead of the rate for ISD 4^78. Taxes Payable Yrar ISD4C76 ISD #277 ISD#?.H4 1982 44.85 47.38 40.68 1983 55.93 51.75 42.98 1984 57.24 52.91 47.63 1985 55.93 49.75 46.51 1986 58.67 57.52 51.35 1987 61.55 53.56 49.88 1988 63.95 57.06 57.38 1989 (2) 58.06 47.92 50.56 1990 52.55 42.33 49 77 1991 55.36 45 78 50 2a (2) 8 tglnii«n with taxes payable in 1989, die temiinolofy for Assessed Valuations Md Mill Hues is no lomer used Tui Capacity leplaocs Assessed Valuations and is determined tn the Sifiw manner aaoepi using inudkr peroenB^ for each property dass Tax Extension Rates are detcnnincd hi a shnilar manner to Mill R^cs in that the tax levy is divtckd by the tax capacity. no a.-.'' , . a.II I I I I I ] i I I H i I I I ^■1 I I I 4 I I isaafaihi . v.r •■,*. '■-' :k^f ■ ■wh ■ ••;■ Fi*‘rV' il Table 5 ISD#278 School Pstrictcn Area Vo-Tech School Hennepin Qxinty Metro Council/ Transit CXhcr Special Psiricts Total 46.44 1.47 29.18 3.35 1.10 92.37 51.39 1.12 28.45 3.88 1.31 96.75 54.82 1.45 29.69 3.90 1.70 102.78 53.54 1.49 29.26 3.88 1.36 99.31 59.51 1.54 29.69 3.80 2.16 107.53 55.08 1.42 29.36 3.90 2.19 104.02 59 JO 1.49 31.67 4.05 2.28 111.03 50.01 1.22 27.10 3.41 2.05 93.42 47.17 1.10 27.92 3.72 2.03 94.71 52.74 1.05 30.11 4.11 3.39 103.27 T ■}^ 'Irfc fer!' -:ii^v; iif"'Ift af m, .;■ sa m"mr-k 0. .'>'Pi#:fe-m fii 'M' m- ■ #•'J^; il .. ’iS# m Fiical Year ^■i;.'sil-»i.-.fe:*;’^-... CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Special Assessments Levies and Collections Current Assessments Due Current Assessments Collcaed Ratio of Current Collections to Amount Due 112 CX 'inquent Assessments Colleaed 1982 $ 374.813 S 341.295 91.1 9c $ 24.112 1983 348.861 314.509 90.2 21,882 1984 444,067 373.123 84.0 19.381 1985 375.403 313.670 83.6 40.1% 1986 362,515 321.142 88.6 25,765 1987 296.702 262.268 88.4 23.446 1988 257.154 216.503 84.2 68,5C<» 1989 208.158 183.261 88.0 P.604 1990 222.063 198.202 89.3 35.565 1991 228,169 213.418 93.5 14.419 II I I I -VI^1 I I I 3I I I I I I i I I I I I m #.< [|#s‘'-' |#VAl|; I®:- • •jS-Mi. -; ' € ''>) V ■': i ■■ ‘>^,*.f- r r<. ;■ > |pff _, ;-A iiP-^l§' - ■ ^V'f‘ *pl': pi».nr "■ i"l|.vl-'Mf s- m.ir li^^'Ji. ■* 5^*' ‘ • • *.! .- n-ji ■ . Spedat Assessments Delinquent $ 102,984 100,616 133.645 159.058 136,302 147,635 90,023 61,562 43.766 43,313 Table 6 Total Outstanding Assessments $ 1.720.166 1,693.659 1.413.639 2,047.811 1.247.407 1.021,321 764.234 663.372 735.609 581.048 113 > •I ; ';-i 1 {C^. ^.y = ■" ■M ,¥n. '9 ixs. n :-\ -*^*i*—*- *^- -W'' 5k I ■jU'- ri; K L/- I ;:#■ ■i crrv OF ORONO, Minnesota Ratio of Net General Bonded Debt to Assessed Value or Tax Capacity and Net Bonded Debt Per Capita Debt Rscal Year Population (2) Assessed Value (in 1,000s) Cross Bonded Debt(l) Service Funds Available Net Bonded Debt 1986 i,m S 100.778 $ 1,722.088 $ 1.354.642 $ 367.446 1987 7,212 103,552 1,504,562 1.158,862 345,700 1988 7.284 107.415 1,350.789 1,035,242 315,547 1989 7,379 14.352 (4)1.2l)7.22(-;867.436 339,784 1990 7,213 (5)12.892 1.010.710 694.251 316.459 1991 7,303 14,379 4,811.055 928.917 3,882.138 (1) Includes bonds recorded In the General Long-Term De Acanint Group Prior to 1986, the General Long-Term Dd>t Aca>ant Group did not include any tax supported bonded debt. In 1986, the Special Assessment Fund Type was eliminated and such bonds were recorded in the General Long-Term Debt Acaumt Group. Gross NMKkd debt has been reduced by Debt Service deferred special assessments receivable in arrkx to reflect only tax supported debt burden. Debt Service Fumh available include amounts in Debt Service Fijndi established in 1986 to service goicral obligation debt previously recorded in Spectai Assessment Funds For pioposes of this analysis. Debt S^ice Funds available do not include individual fund l^lance amounts in excess of the related individual bond issue amount indudev! in gross bonded ddn. (2) hspulation from Metropr^litan Qnincil estimatv as of April 1. annually, (a) Rating history frxjm Moody Invcsus^ Service. (4) Beginning with uical year 1989, the t,;nni.ioi >gy for Assessed Valuations is no longer utod. Tax Ctfmcixy refracts Assessed Valuation and is determined in the iMnc manner except ttting snalicr percentages for each property class (5) Federal census (6) The faring fine the 1991 Public Facilities Revenue Botids 'ssued by the Oty of Otaoo'% Homing and Redrvelopmau Authority is Aa. as the City is making icase-purchasc iwymems equal to tfw annual debt service rtx)uirenicfU While the imeni is lo oontinu; the ■nnuai paymeias and Nidgct annual appropn^Knis. the City may terminue the lease as pnTvided m the Icaseiurduisc amtract . i4 II M f.t- i' 'V !'•■■■ I E‘«V‘fe.V ?■?.'.fe: ' ■•K?: ■' M i m 4 .. .mm Tables OTV OF ORONO. MINNESOT A Computation of Legal Debt Margin Dccemficr 31. 1WJ Total maricet value S 589^5^) Debt limit (2.0% of estimated actual propen v value)n,785.910 Total bonded debt S 7.400.0fJO Lets bonds not repaid solely fh>m tax levies 0.0. Improvement Bonds G O. Revenue Bonds Public Facilities Revenue B*>nds 1.100.(1)0 2.300.f«0 4.000.000 7.400.000 Total anH>unt of debt applicable to debt limit Legal debt margin :2z::-rsz^^..r: 11,785,910 ::iL*;aaa lib I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I.,--/- . ■ ■.■if- ■ ••'■l : .'.■.I.-- .■yV;. -' ♦ rr •'■r V.7\L-S".. t «* ih.■b- ^ S.:. ‘ " r-.I III I I I I .;/■ I I ■j- I V p : Ifs:-:;vr j ■/> '' -I ^■r ••: I ski'"'I m 5:' I ^:: ;■:' % r I Oovttwncnui Unit Din«t4tlii Cky ofOrono Ov«flifi|>int dtbi School ditfrku No. 271 (Orono) No. 276 (Minnetonka) No. 277 (Wetionka) No. 2i4 (Wayzata) No. 2S7 (Alta Vo-Tcch) i Mpin County Lilvariat (tuburtw) S o}nI waata Pirlunf ranp Capital notca Other Matro council Saver diatrici Stadium Tranaii Pafhi/ofKn ipaces OOiar Matro irauait Suhurhan Hcnnepki parki Capital Oirif eoum Toul nverlappmg debt Total diract and overlapping dcN ra!Table 9CTI'Y OF (JRONO. MINNFiiOTA Compt'latiun of Dirtet and Overlapping DeN December ^ 1. 1W1 Net DeN Gross DeN S 4.811.055(6)5 2,^55.(X)U 6.016.45(, 42 26.75(|.IKHI 8.t45.mMt jn.55( •.(•OO 55,480.000 518.^10.0011 44 fi7u.(8iO 40.16f).(*K) t«,25o.tK)0 6.M5.00O 7.550.vKS 8 52VfM) »4< .tut) 655.020 584 I 657.851,659 a^-jnaaersaer-. 'aes' "« (1) Thu debt » eichidad sav e these oNigaiams art rt venue hunds ku(n* >rtC4l Ky Sinking Applicable to Orono Funds Net 1>N Percent Aniounl 928.917 5 5.882.158 100 000 % $ 5.882.1.58 169.175 2.565.82'’48.864 1.25.5.766 1.505.05''4.715.5VV 0.175 S..248 ..-22.098 - 1.826.15t 40.25” V95 1.577 654.555 —- (1)mm l.V)4,446 5.■’75.554 1 895 109.447 8.5« >4 26.741.696 “(2)- 150. ■'88 8.194.212 1..511 107.426 4"'■’.448 9.572.552 1 511 125.496 2.642 4t4 50.857,5(v(,1.511 666.480 56,182.224 282.’27.^-'ti -(5) 14.581 (,41 5(1 088 55V - {*)- o.859,fV.4 42..5(8l,V5o 0.689 291.455 20.V44.465 r 285 555 0.689 119.097 84S.V80 5.-’69.0ll 0.689 .59.748 5.2o" '«N-4 S45.(xel 0689 29.925 i;«,4«'i 9'2 1 895 159.217 -: 5411.0(8)- (M — VI : ?t i‘i6 541.895.588 5.544.854 Vi.U‘4.115 S 545,'*77.526 . .af-------- l(2) HanoepiB Cotmty aoial vaaie deN is ciciuJed since these otiiigatKats ts ill N ftnenced by refuse paytseoti frtn uicn {S) The Matro CoMacil aroitary sewer ueN is escIwdeU. ausmuch as these obltgaiM.ins are pasd fr'.eB metro ves sewer HftrBa eterfci. aieNfdaif payiacnta inaa the Oor*«> Sewer Opersiaig Fund {4} ifairo Cmwfil iportf dud^ffw debt m cuiuJsd % mt these ^iNigsiM as w ill tw fwiatn. ed by stadium fev«Hv aisl a Cay of hUHHN’olis hotel. noicF rod tayimr ctciM us 01 Tlw Ivibllltllll HefBapiT P^rks deN *s esc tsidrU saw* these tvNigjIha* • itl he raianceU be gulf cciwric prtKCcda 0} Oku londid dlla of |7.auQ.0lkl w sadmed by deterred sfws tal aks«wn»«ms and pledged etilbs i,«|Kr«liRg fCses&i IB at fnuB dilt oiffom^ by tairs •11? 1111111111'r r'' -rr ' '-.1Jm:ik.;’> iK--‘ H:>r. k?;r MiIt :b:'i^ # tii- ■gibi'i»'k TabltlOCITY OF ORONO. MINNTLSOTA Revenue Bond Coverage —Einicrprije Funds (3) WalHr Oparatinf Fund Sewer Operating' jnd Fite el Orott Revenues Operating Hxpenses Net Revenue AvailaNe fur Debt Serv ice Requirenents Year _.iU_. _12J Debt Service Prmc ipal Interest Total Coverage 1989 S 189.086 S 159.586 S 29.500 $$ 17.917 S 17.917 1 65 1990 265,068 16.3.271 101.797 -74.975 74.975 1..36 1991 234.84.^162 010 72.833 74.497 74.493 0.98 1919 489.658 299.797 189.861 17,499 17.499 10.85 1990 58.3.998 305.980 2’’8.018 -72.188 72.188 3.85 1991 61.3.009 343.230 269.-72.755 72.755 3.71 O) Toiii levcBun. tneUidfli| oacmi (2) Tout eiperataif etpntmi mi of drproetitn 01 Hmm wmi an eawwwii lirmdi firKit tr> I uiv ill II I I I I I I Iu I I Ik>il I I I I ''■i I I •f-.-^^7lw •*> tP H'lr^-r- • :—--.ftpE- fF^rfe-iif- V’fA” •*i,U_t:I Iy,•.. . -r-,. », r-- I j ..V,'I m I I I tVf ■ v:;l -Yt.^4^=^. V/.,,; I iir CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Ratio of Annual Debt Service Expenditures for General Bonded Debt to Total General Expenditures (1) (1) Xndudet Gcfietml. Special Revenue, and IX-bt Servue Funds Table 11 kM' » ■m-Fiscal Interest Total Debt Total General Ratio of Debt Service ID Total GetKial m Year Principal and Other Servia Expenditures Expenditures IP' h -'r '1982 $ 30,000 $ 12,363 $ 42.363 $ 1,565.000 2 7% I ■• j'-’ 1983 30,000 10,780 40.780 1.721.979 2.4 ft 1984 35,000 9,105 44.105 1.928.554 2.3 1985 7.241 42.241 1.SU4.208 2 2 .;. ». . 1986 (2)520.000 224.693 744.693 3.021.848 24.6 i'1987 (2)485,000 197,184 682.184 3.014,963 22.6 ‘ 1 - ■1988 360.000 174.876 534,876 2,936.983 18.2 1 1989 325,000 150,520 475.520 3.262.134 14.6 1990 300.P00 126.393 426.393 3.415.236 12.5 |: ■ ■• 1991 300.000 106,266 406.266 3.297.372 12.3 (2) Befimii^ tn 1^. espenditures previiHisly reaaikd m Special Assessment Fund^ became a amponem of Debt Sexier Fimd expendmars tn acaedancr «ith Gtyvermnemai Aco)untiit| StMKitftli Board Statemeia No b !I9 -1 •^7?■ -V-■ ■ i ^ -iU:'.- W‘ -•r-i : ^ r'.-. ,yr, • • .,» ‘ • -''I ‘-’ • ‘ >i • v: m'' ' \'>- I'; i {SI,: t .. -f/j. •'liji"^* Nm,-fc'- ■.* • f yip- >-e' '%6. cm' OF ORONO, MINNESOTA FisoU Yctf 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 Population (1) 6,820 6,820 6,820 7,020 7.172 7,212 7,284 7.379 7,213(5) 7.303 Demographic Suitistics Per Capita Q) S 14.879 15.626 17.222 18.217 18.990 20.096 21.239 22.584 23.500 • 24.21K) ’ School Enrollme nt (3) 2,256 2.112 2,013 1.978 2.001 1.997 2.037 2.101 2.175 2.289 Table 12 Unemployment Rate (4) (1) bktioOoundl (2) MenI Census Bureau daa; Hennepin County average (3) MinncaoCi DepHtment of Education, as reported by Oron> Schi>i>t District No 278 (4) Mbvietotai Department of Eounomic Secunty. limnepm CVwnty average (5) Meril Ccnuis Eidiaate 120 6.0% 6.3 4.4 4.1 3.9 4.1 3.3 3 6 4.1 4.3 I I I I I I I mtI I t-■ I I ■■> ^':^' I ; ■' I r; i'V, # »■ ■ -!•.I is,. :''V y y ■ • ■■'■ y■ ■ Ir¥ li- I '■1. li I '-V^S', :-A =ty- ' i--!- ' !■I •■ 1- Fiaaii Yw IM2 1M5 1M4 IMS 19S6 1M7 19M im 1990 1991 Canmcrcial CoretnictknCl) iNumber of Atimiu Value 11 12 11 25 23 26 II 7 21.320 66.200 243.595 80.050 2.555.700 .3.920.090 J62.700 1.337.750 419.050 (1) Oiyla^»cikBOe|«nnait TaUc 13CTIY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA htpcfty Value. Coruiructic*). and Bank DtepuaiU Residential Conitfuction(l) ^ ||MP*9 m Oamny .lAaaaaawf lln>ar>waiw. Reankmttd wKludrt farwt ffev^toitAr ts vtriuad tiy ft* CksMy ok* awry ti« yean {3| AasaportailoOMMietai West by Ftn> Bnli of the l.ak»« i:i ;.'U.A,... Nirntber of Bemiiu Value Eitinialed Market Value (2) Industrial/ Commercial Residential Neat-Taxable Bank Depcaitt (3) 211 $ 6.386.690 $ 11.940.267 S 294.5.30.941 $-$ 14.080.597 241 9.726.860 1.3..3.36.600 330.560.020 -15.032.685 .323 13.559.790 14.04.3.400 34.3.860.900 -16.879.156 314 15.583.160 14.46.3.800 .368.666.2«)-18.321.9.33 343 14,W>5.465 14.733,VS)37i.i68.Xm -27.331.671 343 19.824.845 15.652.6«I ,387.24 3.8<X)22..325.430 25.215.093 ' X)15.836.267 16,2U8./jO<'39 3.876. ■’(*1 -25^353.000 360 17.416.288 16.734.tXX>441.270.880 --27.693.000 .333 14.28.3.82X 18..V,4.I(M)486.‘^76.(*iU -29.031,945 233 6.641..399 21.798.200 552.(»O',200 .3a796.880 A ' J i;?* I I'- 1 ;■ ■;■■ m-t imm: "tm:, CrrY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Principal Taxpiiycrs Tabic 14 Taxpayer Type of business Assessed 1991 Payable 1992 Tax Cajxtciiy Percent of Total Tax Capacity Washington Scientific Manufacturing $ 145,899 1.01 % Vi^yzata Cotmtry Qub Pnvate Club 100.292 0.70 Van Dale, Inc.Manufacturing 90.H.I5 0.63 Privtte Residence Single Family Residence 87.956 0.61 Private Residence Single Family Residence 84.698 0.59 Private Residence Single Family Residence 84.281 0.59 Private Residence Single Family Residence 69.34*?0.48 Mvate Residence Single Family Residence 64.754 0.45 Woodull Courury Gub Private Club 44.864 0.31 Residence Single Family Residence 40.604 0.28 $ 813,530 _5j5/7f Hnei IBc]^nnifif with taxes poyi^tc in IVHV, ttur tcrmtm>k>g> h<r AsscssciJ VaiuatKms aiki Mill Ra^ is no kxifCT used. Tax Capacity repiaers AsscisrU ValiatKim uk I is ckirmnncxi m the smuc manner except ustng smaller prrcrma$rs kv okh pnipi-ny class Tax EatrmHm Rates arc tkterrmned m a sMltf RiMincr a> Mill Rates in that (he tax levy is dbvHkJ h> the Tas Capacity •> *. 4S -A,-. -------- it’T I I I I r' I %I I•f r.:' r I ■.i- .-y ■ m ' i I i . I I I ^':v‘-,' I^:- ,i' ^!l I I I i?l' 'V; ■ Table 15CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Miscellaneous Statistics December 31, 1991 OMe of Inooiporation December 17.1954; effective January 1,1955 i^xni of fovenvnem Optional Plan "A"; CounciV-Adnunistrakir Area 24.5 square miles; 50^( is open water or marshl md 11 •Mitel of ti City Private State and County Ntoi li^^s .1 <*a>triFlrrpp Nuraber of cities providing oontracted (Ire coverage Police protection Nwnber of stations Numbcf of police oftlccrs btenibcr of cities served Eduooion Attendance centers Number of students Water and seww operations Number ci oonnections Witter Sewer Recreattan and culture Number of parks Nufrticr of swimming botches w » /•yees Ci^fied lervioc/fulMime hvHtiiie/seasonal 45.83 15.42 29.28 120 1 17 4 3 2,289 850 1,698 10 with 44.20 local acres 3 with 1.40 kHaJ acres 38 16 123I §&? :?i^. -;' ,.r"\ •1 !. .. ■ y ;.‘. '..' ■;(': II':' ?--j4ryK-rr- . -i. r, '.; ; ■- '■ ^ , V ■' r, .; -f- m, ■i ■^,.r " 5 -V -V' Table 16 CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Tax Capacity, Tax Ixvitvs, and Tax Extension Rates 1992 Collectible m 1991 1990 'Dix capeity Real property $ 12.922.819 $ 14,035.873 $ 12.568353 Personal propen y 195.919 178.110 172,131 Fiscal disparities a>ntribution (306.699)(279.307)(253.952) Fiscal disparities distributi(^n 3^2,543 444,083 405,682 Total tax capacity $ 13,164/82 |.Jir378J59 $ 12.892314 Tax levies by Cxninty Auditor General Fund $ 1.656,681 $ 1.650.741 $ 1.585.546 Debt Servit'e Funds 1985 Impnivcment Btmds 50.000 40.000 35,000 1980 Improvement Bonds 16.800 17.300 17,7(X) 1982 Impnwement Btmds 5.500 5.5(X)— 1991 Pirt>lic Facilities Btmds _ J^2.4(l()— TiHal Uix levies i 1.71 L«i_$ 1,638,246 Tax extensiim rales by Cttunty Auditor GeiXTal Fund 12.022 ^11,430 %12 361 % Debt Sers ice Fumls 1985 Improvement Btmds 0 363 0.277 0.273 1980 Improve^ .ent Bt^tds 0 122 0 120 0.138 1982 lmprt>vement Btmds 0,040 0 03r.— 1991 Public Facilities B»mds 1 686 —•- Total tax extenskm rates 14 233%11 865 %12.772 % 124 I-'i I i I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I. I I“K- k I- .■ -i-v'-l- mk’i:- ■: i‘ ■■', -f-,; I& I I It I '.•r t ■ 8; t ‘'I!' I Iw I INTERNAL CONTROL STRIC I IRE AND Qi.! ■I 11; B- :^j m ^r-'. - iiiillMaMiaakiiM Pf¥NCmMJ5 KENNCTH W MAUX3N' Om thcmm a KAANCM^), Cf^ PHNUl A RAOO^FVICH om THE INTERNAL CONTROL ST&LLCBIM IN accordance with GOVERNMENT AU01TIN_G STANPARPi City CottiKil and Residents Cky of Orono Orofio. Minnesou Wf hivt audited the general purpose financial statements uf the City of Orono. Minnesota, as of and for the year ended December 31. 1991, and have issued our refn)rt iherw>n dated June 1. 1992 We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and GtfYgBPimi ftmlhinf Usued by the Comptroller General of the United States Those standards require that wi |ilan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the general purpose financial mifwMiiiit ve free of nutterial misstatement b and performing our audit of the general purpo-.c financial sta.ementN of the City of Orono for b« yaar ended December 31. 1991. we considered its ir.ternal control structure in order to determine OW audUing procedures fur the purps>se of expressing our crpmion on the general purpose ftnar^tal gfvf not to provide assurance on the internal c »ntrv>l structure Tl» mam^iefiKftt of the City of Orono is resp4m>ihle for establishing and maintaining an internal contrtd Wl^liire. In fttIfUUng diis resfK»nsihility. estimates and ludgements hy management are required to w,»sess the «p«ted bei»fit» and relied costs of internal control structure policies and procedures The ohjactivci of lUi tettwnid control structure are to provide management with rcastmable. but not ahsotiMe, 1^ lafeguarttod against loss from unauthoruted use or dtip»»tkKm, and All eaacttted in acoofdntice with management s wthortimwin rod recorded propwly to permh At pwptmion of ^neral purpose financial st«emems in accordance with generally accepted accoumm| firbc^bs. Reratitf of inhereiu limimions in any internal cimtrol struciure. nrrors or kregularitm may UiwurONltNii occur and not be dtsecied Also. projectK>n of any evaluink'n of tf» siruciure to hn^re gMrfoib ti to Ae risk (Hju pr^icedures may bect»me inadiNbiate because '»f changes *n cotiditxuts t)C Aff Ae elfecliveaMSs of Ae design and op«r^h>n of p»>lkie» and prinedures may deteriorate (ci^nttnuedi 125 «A AMA SAiAlAA HAnA AA jANA HiiA iiAra.eHit AAA mmmmrnijiimm rnMmmm I■ -t I I I I I I M-I I I I I I I I I I I I ?ir For tflf purpose of this report, we have classified the significant internal control structure policies and procedures in the follow ing categories cash receipts revenue, cash disbursements'expenditures, payroll, and external financial reporting For ail of the internal control structure categories lisied above, we obtained an understanding of the design of relevant policies and procedures and determined whether thev have been placed in operation, and we aasessed control risk We noted certain nuKters involving the internal control structure and its operation that we consider to be raoortabie conditions under standards established bv the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Reportable conditions involve matters coming to our attention relating to significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the internal control structure that, m our judgement, could •dvenely affect the entity’s ability to record, pr(^cev^. summarize, and report financial data consistent with the asst* ' MS of management in the general purpose financial staiementv Because of the I. tited size of your office staff your organization ha'' limited segregation of duties A good system of internal accounting control Ci'niemplaies an adequate ‘'egregaiion of duties so that no one individual handies a transaction from inception i" completion While we recognize that your organization is not large enough to permit an adequate segregation of duties in all respects, it is important that you be aware of this condition A mtterial weakness is a reportable condition in which the design or operation >f the specific internal control itructuie elements does not reduce to a relatively low lesel the risk that errors or irregularities in anu>unts that would be material in relation to the general purpi.)se finanvial statements being audited may occur and not be detected withm a timely period by emplv>yees m the normal course of pertorming their assigned hinctions Our consideration of the internal control structure would not necessarily disclose all matters in the mternaJ comrol structure that might oe reportable conditions and, avcordingly. would m>t necessarily disclose all raportaMe conditions that are also considered to be material weaknesses a.s defined id>ove We believe that the reportable condition described above is a material weakness This condiit<m wa.s considered in det^mining die nature, timing, and extent id the procedurev to be performed m our audit of the City of OroQO, Minnesota’s general purpose financial statements i...' the year ended December 31 . 1991 . and dus report does not affect our reports ihereim dated lune 1 I9<ir We also noted other m^uters mvtdving the internal ccMroi structure and its itperatKm that we have reported to the management of the City of Oono M inesoia. in a separate letter dated lune 1. 1992 This report is imended solely tor the use of the C ity C t»uni.il and management of the City of Oroiso and should not be used for any other purps>se This restriction is not intended to limit the distribution of this report which, upon acceptance by the City Council, is a matter of public record li^ I. 1992 !2b I ^5? ■, i' I V I'*': b -..I I I I *■ . I I I I h' I I I I I I i v .V *ri: V "l^ .w ri m PtHJL A WOOOMVCH. cm BASED ON AN AUDIT OF THE GENERAL PLRPOSt; FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFQRMLD IN ACCORDANCE WITH City Council and Residents Chy of Orono Orono, Minnesota W* have tntdited the general purpose financial staiemenis of the Citv *>f Ori'no, Minnesota, for the year ended December 31. 1991. and have issued our report theretm dated June I. 1992 We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards artd Government AtM^^ing Standard*, issued by the Comptroller General of the Cnited States Those standards re<}uire that we (rfan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance abv*ui vvhether the general purpose financial ftMiincnti are free of material misstatement Cmi^^iiance with laws and regulations applicable to the Cit> ot Orono is the responsibility of the City’s flunagMsent. As part of obtaining reasonable assuranve about whether the general purpose financial MatMiicnis are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of the Cus s con^liance with laws rcfBialiofB, contracts, and grants However, our objective was not to provide an opinion on overall Com|rfiance with such provisions Accordingly, we Jo not express such an opinion The r^ults of our tests indicate that, with respect to the items tested, the City of Ororut ct>mplied. in all BMteriai respects, with the provisions referred to m the preceding paragraph With respect to items not Meted, nothing came Ui our attention that cau'sed us to believe that the City had not complied, tn all aaatcrial respects, with those provisions This report a intend«l solely for the use of the City CDuncil and management > ne City of Oror»t» and should not be used for any other purpose This restriction is m»t intended to limi he distribution of d»a fffKMt which, upon acceptance by the City Counvil, is a matter ot public record lUM I. 1992 ! V < A. life Ih 1 Ks^' 111 I I I I I I I ■34.I I I I k I i I fe r ■;ir- -; Ite, I £0'- k-J: ■■■■ ■)■tei-^»p M-f?:>J.; ri-’ PRINCIRVLS KFNNrrn W MALLCft. c«* nKMAS A KAHNOWSKI CPA fAL* A FiAOOSEVICH CPA INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH MINNESOTA STATE LAWS AND REGULATIONS City Council and Residents City of Orono Orono, Minnesota Wt have audited the general purp<.)se financial statements of ihe Cits of Orono. .Minnesota, as of and for the year ended December 31. 1*^1, and have issued our report thereon dated June 1. 1992 We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Local Government promulgated by the Legal Compliance Task Force pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 6 65 Accordingly, the audit included such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the ciroimstances. The Miimmota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Local covers five mam categories of compliance to be tested: contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of interest, public indebtedness, ami claiim and disbursements Our study included all of the listed categories The results of our tests indicate that tor the items tested the City of Orono. Minnessua. complied with the material terms and conditions of applicable legal pr<*viMons Funher. for the items not tested, based on our audit mkI the procedures referred to above, nothing vame ti> our attention to indicate that the CtiV had not ooR^lied with such legal provisions This report is imended solely for the use of the City Council and management of the City of Orono and ihouM not be used for any other purpose This restriction is not intended to limit the distribution of this report which, upon acceptance by the City Council, is a matter of public record luM I. 1992 128 moulds mm «a»4i ;.»lj ■ ■■ y.: ^Oj.0 Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron, Moorse, City Administrator July 9, 1992 fA V*%/7 H > V **. Selection of a Name for the Frontage Road Serving New City Facilities At its last meeting, the Council agreed that the frontage road serving the new City facilities should be na*Tted in honor of Les Kelley. The Council delayed final action until staff could contact the Kelley family to determine whether they supported the Idea* The family has been contacted and is supportive. The name su9oested at the last meeting was Les Kelley Memorial Drive. In starf discussions it was suggested that the name should be shorter. One option is simply Les Kelley Drive. Another is Les Kelley Parlcway or simply Kelley Parkway, which coincides with Les Kelley's service on the Park Commission. Isv ■'r/ i •"T-’..........#P JlP'*' ,1: Pl-:Ip teuv . wmt ^ •*'C/. BiS ig'k iLl-"■?.; |y^': «is:: Ron Moorse, City Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director July 8, 1992 Rid Award of Rebid Items New Facility The attached letter from for the newfacility* indicates recommendation facility. Th. only it., that W.S "Ot budgeted is the seathe Rtthlic works garage and will nave contingency . ch '>■ liifl."Sip'S' 5a:» .p: #■« - ■'. ■yr--4.:. *• . .-ip- wm m m^»-”fa" ■jl 'ifc-4 il’l®* P # ■'m®. ffi June 23. 1992 Mr. Ron Moorse City of Orono 1335 Brown Road South Crystal Bay. MN 55323 I KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY COS IK \( M )t^S \ ( ( iSS’Kl ( IK )S W AS vC.TRS Re: Orono Public Wo»'ks Equipment Package K/aWoi•ojcct #4059 Dear Ron: The following is a bid ubulation of several of the bid sections that we put out for a re-bid. I have noted (*) our recommendation for award. 1.nnor Scaler at Public Wgrkj ♦Technical Surfacing, Inc. Division 7 Corporation Gresscr Concretc/Masonry 58.850.00 59.000 00 $10,372.00 2. Insulation ♦Citywidc Insulation Arrow Industries Si 0.220.00 SI 5.240.00 3.Ccrami£ ♦Dale Tile Twin City Tile Grazzini Tile S2 1.292.00 $23,820.00 $23.760 00 i Stnictural and Misccllangi •Amereci Danny's KMH Western $15.14500 $21,000.00 $27,970.00 $20,265.00 Pleue review this information and call me if you have any questions. Let me know if I can proceed %dth he award of these contracts as soon as you can. Very truly yours, KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRt ACTION COMPANY John Davies Project Manager JD/lp cc: Jon Rail BKP Mwwwwfwlti PMstem 5ZS SiMrfh §ih xrwK Vl4rwwNHi»>liv S'»404 Phunv (Sizt HZ -ZIM fAX (qu4l tloi3omimtv •1^: sv ■'i'^ JpS '■■' 'mf'-:m-'^L P.f. /7 TO* PROM* DATS* Ron Moorse, City Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director July 8, 1992 SOBJECTs Bid Award Fuel Distribution System New Facility On June 8. 1992, staff recommended and Council approved tabling the bid award for the fuel distribution system for the new City facility pending research of an above ground system. We have been advised that an above ground system can cost an additional $17,000.00 not including the cost of filing for a variance to allow for 10,000 gal. capacity per tank, and costs for landscaping or screening. we have been advised that the type of system we are recommending meets all state and federal guidelines and that it is a system that will be used for several years. The budgeted asiount for the fuel distribution system was $71,300.00. The low bid with add ons and deductions amounts to $67,867.00 and recosusend proceeding and award the bid to Pump & Meter for the above aaeunt. It should be noted that one of the deductions was for a personal OOspulEAr for tho fuolin^ systoin in th€ amount of $lf200#00# Wo will be purchasing a personal computer for approximately the same asiount but it will be a unit that will be compatible to our existing personal OQwputers. % tm- -i i'Siit / <■ >■ ■ *«• - ^ -.. ■■ ■ I ..‘V "I—-r—;’Wf ,. S'. h0- m; ■ - . • 'mf'- fli :::i. '■ ;i^*=1KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CONTK \CTORS .s CON JRl ( fl( M July 8, 1992 f [ Mr. Ron Moorsc City of Orono 1335 Brown Road South Crystal Bay, MN 55323 "JUi 9 5.9-e Rc: Orono Public Works Equipment Package K/A Project #4059 Dear Ron Enclosed is a letter »vcd from Pump and Meter f-ompany regarding some alternate pricing for tic fuel distribution equipment package I have also enclosed a copy of their original quotation and their supplemental quote for adding deadman hold down anchors. Please call me if you have any questions Very truly yours. US-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ihn Davies Project Manager JD/lp Enc. Mwwwayotii t>*t^>n So,lt^ «lt> S«r«w« VCnn. jpiWn MN SS404 Fhooe <6I.V '2«1 ' «»’*> ^ «n«» t<^l‘ lpuo»tun*f» jo:,- , -J'iC i1 'ftWTTV'f-^IgSssSS- tFim^ anJ <nc. M.MNSS343 !? i>- ''VI?i r m at- ■•■w^:<r=- iP‘W «:■ ':\4'^:. >■-"■: - •.;•,■>'■ ■-}' p. iVP^- ft w 1 ‘- ft. T ^'^ n, > ■ ,Iv;* ftft.It :'-iV'' ■,A-: MKEKEAtY Phon«; 61J-933-*800 FAX612J3*^i8 FORM OF PROPOSAL Section: 003CO-1 iCompany —wnraonnuavie^ 525 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55404 Re: Bid Package Na Three (3) Orono Municipal Facflltles Orana Minnesota May IS. 1902 1.01 BASE BIO: Tha undersigned, having carefully examined the site and local conditions and the Contract Documents. Including Advertisement for Bids, Instnjctlons to Bidders. Contract Forms. Gerterai Conditions, Buppieriientaiy Corxiltiona. Specifications arxl Drawings, and Addenda Nos. i . .as prepared by the Architect. Boarman Krooe Pflster & Associates. Inc., heretsy propose(s) to furnish aN labor, equipment and/or materlais required to accomplish the Work called for by sakJ documents for the lump sum amoiffits proposed herein. Base Bid includes sales tax and cost for borxf. Bid Category ^ (TWe) Sec:t:Lcn 11140-1 Vehicle Service Equipment Thirty Pour Thousand Eight Hundred Wd S1ir»Y Sow Dollars ($ 34,867.00 ) *• Bid Category 3 (Titfe) section 14450 vehicle lifts_______ Thirty Thou8ar.J Bid Five Hundi-ed mirtcen Dollars($ 30,513.00 ) *** Bid Category 3 (Tde) Section 11142-1 F\iel Distribution Syst Sixty Eight Thousiind Bid Nine Hundred One Dollars ($ 68,901.00 ) * Bid Category Bid (TWe) Dollars (S BldC Bid (Tlfie) Doilars ($J • Deweterutg of Excavation not included. , ee Master piping, natunl gee piping r»t included. Arr piping included for reels atia I only. Electrical %rirlng of cowpreeeor and pressure ^.^tier rx3t included, fi *** Mater orooflna tnairt>rBne bv others. Gxicrete slab t/ork at orade bv others. puhP fvft-'' Wmtmr proofing tmnbrerm by ottmr%. Concrete slab at gracte by ElJKtrIcaJL wiring of powar unit by ottera • f - ■ '<• * ■■♦V-. .-•-> -:•■•I';..v. i-j. FORM CF PROPOSAL Section: 00300-2 ■9i' 0|NED bid DEDUCT; Bid Categoiy # 3 C^t-.cn 11140-1 Vehicle Ser/ice Equipment BidCategoiy #_3 ____htha) Section 14450 Vehicle _Li fts ? ft-. mi •vM. r-~ i lii ^'’4: Bid Category # 3 (TWnl Section 11142-1 F\jel Djstributicn- System Bid Category#(TWe). Bid Category #(TWe) As a combined Bid, DEDUCT:S 2,800.00 1.03 ACCEPTANCE OF BIOS: M«ld«id«t»«»b«eoo»B«t<J*l»i»t)ldandlh»W<x1<- TheContnctor,t>allin^rtth.addendanumt>«» apace pnNtdad wham Wleatad on the (Ifsi page fl< the ProDosa). In automitina iNe bid H la understood that the Owner reserves the right to accept any bid in his bide. im CONTRACT AND BONO; If awofded the coremct. the undersigned agrees to execute an agre abowe i*****< compensation and provide the specified performance bond. 1.06 BiO SEOmiTY; A caMlad ehadc. caaNar't che-A. or bMd^ab^ bL'tln'cJi’di^ the Ov-ter. or the »J«<y *« P«V ““a^^hnn^we^^ ^ ^ signed Pic tkfne specified In the Insmxttons tti Bidders hes elepsed. 1124 0* rV ■- i ri- ‘‘i- hi mi rv1-f • '■;.; ;■ ■> ■C‘ >VK; r b .V %•i', t 7.|» ,mm i\ it *:•• ■■ -vt •.■■ •*■ l/vf..V'Viv; FORM OF PROPOSAL Section: 00300-3 If a cofporatton. what Is state of incofporatlon?_ Mij^n QualBled to do business In Minnesota?^________ N ■ paitnafship, state fuH names of all partners; Current Full, Legal Name of Finn; Name;Ptirm & Meter SeTVlcg.Inc^ Address:y303 Eyrelaior Blvd Hookins. 1^ 55343 end Of SECTION n24 04 ^ -***.^- .;- -• . ■ VpS--i: 4#■■il : I ■ ' / mmi St^tUea, 9i%c.SERVICt •SALES • INSTALLATION :^;.' m p.te, liL w ll# # i-v; f.* •-WM. ■? ;s. '% ^p'a V i Pi 'M Tr , •.: . -■•• V:--> Wfc^^S:-m ,mm ^ -'mr >» * 11303 EXCELSIOR BLVD (612) 933-4800 HOPKINS. MN 55343 FAX (612) 939 0418 July 6, i992 Attnt John Dovimi. Hrsu§ findorson SMJ South Bth Stroot f4pl§, Minn 35404 art section lll*a-t. F>s,t Di.tr,but,on Sy.t,., Orono for the City of John, Drduet »l^e0. 0« Pint Tox ,f cu.tamor .upplir. omn PC Computrr. Omit cmrd oncodor- from bid Drauct .3,OM.ee Plot Tmt. Sincor'ely, PUnP i METER SERVICE, INC. Mi Re Hemly !' •! •fV : tr-mi H fmSm Sin - tktmpdt Cm,$,n$ t Bfi. Stl/^tn Compnssi^t M No.nrroPOfim6258 SERVICE • sales » INSTALLAHON 7 rnttawfctiwl 11303 EXCELSIOR BLVD - (612) 933 4«C0 - HOPKINS. MN *5J« (On Crv. Rd 3 - Jjtt U/«»/ c/ C/y^ RJ. 18} FAX (612) 93f (yu$ ^ liwyf riM UP inn a54tf4 bMONf fM-iOO ^HObr;OATI JJ>-A J 73 toa NAMg Daad Man Pnehoring 1 ■■■■ja-. i Or-ono N^int mn^nem Fsciii6y _________ PMSi h*r«^ pr*fMM M fiwniak Uk**' *nd m«ttf laU •nd/o<’ tQul(»n)«f t for intt fob btiod upon tbi foilowir>g tptc'.'-wuoni mitmiM r^nk tincHmr^ina Hnlcf Damn Unehnr Strjip*- Jf Fern snd pour Man rancrat# anchor* and anchor <B> I0,ddd gaJlon isniiM in a»es¥ation. » y&f ki^ir jnssF ^it-H tvawdiiuitranomitmm§mo 767) ibk42<S_L;d- *f »M» • / life' l»>ptOitU Mina MiiMtria itaty stw § —/Iff m • '« l>»ttMI'Sv ^ »r# HiA»' V«M >»« w C». r«ai» ^Mif - Vatamje CMm # iiwurj Cmaaf > rila#iltii 7«i« 4 riaa a»9 «tf t S#(/ Eamaowi Aat« U/ta i Parti - Sfafi#« P<«#t . -vk— 7 'V - :k, Ir ::r/rf',v ■t . -'■ ; V> -t - 5^>! ■# ■:H7 ,:)i- :hfr ■If .B'-V',' \:’■4V*? TO: MOM: OATB: Ron Moorstf, City Af^rrt i n i st ra tor /-/a;.A/n / Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Adrainistratofi<‘/>^ ^9^<^i5 July 7, 1992 %V SOBJECTi Stephen Weckraan - Perfocraance Review and Salary Adjustment Exhibits: A. Council 'linutes 10/28/91 B. Memo Dated 13/24/9! Mr. weckman has satisfactorily '^omp 1 eted h, 3 ;.ne yea. probationary period as of January IS, ^ ^ recOBisendeClon to Council in the enclosed memo dated 19/.4/9., hU position is scheduled for salary review in July of 1992. Mr Weckman continues to record successes in 'Convincing residents to either upgrade sub-standard systems or >'’»«»“ •i/a«'d»(iia where the existing systems were recorded as iilinq tor Sw U ySsrs. in 1991, Stephen completed the inspection of over 69i exieting systems which remains the goal o.. cepar.ment f a full time employee. RECOMMENDATION -Pec the ho"J7l rHe a-vr r rVc^m^rd^ :c^A?sV^’o^ hourly rate of $13.60 to be effective July 20, 1992 with roconssonded salary review scheduled for Decemoer 199 3. fc r ,^V v> ■\r :i /9- ’£S Cr THE RE3ULAR CRCNO COUNCIL MEETING - CCTC3ER 28, 1991 MCWO - GRANT APPLICATION - CONT. Jabboup asked how many meetings they would have to attend- N.,.on noted there would-be ^thl^“rSNnSli ”?«n®woulS not have to be named at this time. Just agreement to participate with the project. was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Council. to authorize hM'tf'fal of a clean water partnership grant application for Long faJl fnd L aSrirt^pa^ticipate with the public informational tlitingl? and to adopt the Resolution #3035 as submitted. Ayes 5e nays 0. Moors, asked vho the other participants would be. N.leon noted they are asking for help from the ONR. Medina and Hennepin Conservation District. City of Goetten asked why they chose Long Lake. 1 it was the worst lake in the area as far as gllllt”'^ SnS ?h^? J.it ^“rrwere factors which could be changed that were causing the problems. Nelson stated they hoped to start this project in the spring of 1992. r.iiahan felt th1s Is one example of how the watershed Is (•#16) SALARY ADJUSTMENT A CHANSE POSITION TITLE - STEPHEN HECKMAN It was aoved by Butle-. seconded by Jabbour. to change Stephen Heckaan't title to Ma.iager of the Sewage Treatment Program elatle Hanaoer. and to Increase his salary to Level 6. Step 2; •* tn'^hourly rate of S12.509 to be effective as of September 1. 199 with a salary review In July. 1992. Ayes 5. nays 0. (e0|7) resolution #3036 - ORDERING REPORT 6 FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ?I“Im «I.“br6utler. seconded by Jabbour. to adopt llolV ”SlMnJ a feislblllty report for the Stubbs Bay s.-.r arms. Ayes 5. nays 0. f#lB) RESOLUTION #3037 - RECEIVING FEASIBILITY STUDY 4 CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING FOR STUBBS BAY SANITARY SEVER If-asHov.d by Butler. seconded by Jabbour. to adopt #3037 accepting the feasibility study and calling for a 0 nearlna on Wednesday. November 23. 1991 et 7:CO P.m. -he Stubbs 9*/ Art* Sanitary Stwtr Ayts 5. nays 0 I*I K“ P' w Ilf-m'' I K. iV' i X. W' a '•'. r*- , ■ I.. ^Wt: ■ ■/vAJ-;;:; ■ Vv I- t: . > 5 "I r -. n%g. Ron Moocse, City Adiinistr-3to- Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building s Zoning Administrator TO: FROM: DATE: October 24, 1991 SOBJECT: Stephen Weckman - Change of Title/Salary Adjustment List of Exhibits: A. Staff Memo Be Council Minutes 1/14/91 Ce Compensation Plan Ch.n,. of «tle - Although the staff memos and formal Council n^n 3'=\"he ”‘Sanrger of the'^Sewe'rage Treatment Neckman “*® , . , [,g hired as the eventual Manager of the Program, in reality After a oeriod of time, whereby Sewerage Treatment Program. - performance in these staff had an thJs interloperiod he has been referredassigned duties ourin, this interun^^^^^^^ J«»My%ec?gn!zenrthe Manager of the Sewerage Treatment ifigram or for the benefit of the public. Septic Manager. u rai 1 *«n-ets of the Droqram including major Stephen has II P « presented to Council sometime rsvislon of the septic code to p continuei to be the main is„°t«t"?o'r Vl l'%"rrn:Lri^%ro ‘ns-, he%u°p"er‘v"ise - and inspects SS::nn^Vallat.ons. He haa performed ‘/yr.mVT;.’ th^ • al.tlng systems completing for ’'a full time City, whic . also assumed the responsibility of Mvlewlng the eeptlc test information submitted with all rural «bdreUion.r completing the on-site in.pections and completing l^^poirt to the Zoning Department. « -a.4«.sam r*f^«lve m3 ttv compllments concerning Heckman's ;iin.%^.*\u%To “.VlUor\'int5:i ’u'b.V’rn^ ^"ecorrJu^c.^ H^re^"fi^"f./*v^Vc\uv^a’yht:grrn--j:t% iJiSector to Manager of the Sewerage Treatment Program Stephen Weckman. Salary Adjustment - Although Mr. Weckmen’s original HH^i. iuee"lon.ire for the full time position emeTi,**^ of l»vel 9. bftsed on the Compensation Plan s MrfVraenea level chart, his pustlon was Initiated at a leval ^ pecrerman K^nriv rata of $11,814. I recommend an increase to tlt^el *. .te"pT .t^n hUly rV" S12.5SB to p« •»‘<-'-7i*: V.»:«ZhVr 1 1991, Based on direction of Council s ?«oameode"lon thit called for a salary review in his aoprortmetely August 5, 1991. Mr. wec<m.n s years ««"ue thrLgh’to Janu-jy 15. 19<.:. with a^ recommended salary review in the poeltlon scheduled .oz -ul/ i99*. ;M.w. ^W' Ipm- T ■', ■ v-r,- ). • •■ •■■ r- ^■ :•■■•,!■ y:.-"‘ji -'t IfP s«i!- mm- A.y%'" ->'v? ‘ hA Pfc Pt tyj. .:’ "P>*- ffiP- :-;p%,. ^v;r7?¥l|P :' r' mt■PlPp.^ %y. pm- -pt -• k. •• - l'<?/•<7/ ^4 Tot Frooi Dotoi Ron Moorse^ City Administrator Tom Kuehn, Finance Director~'J^i July 9, 1992 Subjoc^t Summary Publication of 1991 Annual Financial Report Tha attached Annual Summary Financial Report for the year ended December 31, 1991 is presented for the July 13, 1992 Council meeting. State law requires that the City publish a avoBiiiary of its Annual Financial Report in this format by July 30 in a local newspaper. I would request Council approval of the summary for publication. I^ropoeed Notion: Moved by seconded by the 1991 Summary Financial Report for publication Hay* _ _ _. to approve Ayes _ _ _ lav s "tSjK p:/'':;;ur “'■A^V W<- j pr:’ f’V':: 4"' **;■ ^ ■■'•. f' •> rWy. p.' m- ¥- 62791.9 (87) CITY OF ORONO ANNUAL SUMMARY FINANCIAL REPORT TEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1991 Th« purpose of this report is to provide a summary of financial information concerning the City of Orono, Minnesota to interested citizens. The complete financial statements may be examined at the Orono City Office at 1335 Brown Road Sjuth. Questions about this report should be directed to Tom Kuehn, Finance Director, telephone (612) 473-7357. The information presented is from the general purpose financial statements of the City for the year ended December 31, 1991 and 1990. The right-hand column show*^ the percentage change in dollars between the two years. Revenues and Expenditures for General Operations Revenues Taxes Special Assessments Intergovernmental Revenues Charges for Services Other Tota 1 Expenditures General Government Public Safety Streets Parks and Recreation Other Capital Outlay Debt Service Total Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures Other Plnancing Sources (Uses) Bond Proceeds Operating Transfers In (Out) - Net Fund Equity, beginning of Year Fund Equity, End of Year Total 1991 Tota 1 1990 Percent Increase (Decrease) 31,682,260 31,637,670 3% 166,987 200,600 (17) 81,202 136,328 (40) 726,118 758,369 (4) /64,999 769,493 (1) 3,421,566 3,502,460 (2) 652,105 683,176 (5) 1,508,485 1,419,419 6 474,350 471,420 1 44,791 48,129 (7) 218,619 106,778 105 668,005 284,086 135 406,266 426,393 (5) 3,972,621 3,439,401 16 (551,055)63,059 (974) 3,964,230 4* W •• - --- -- 5,639,279 5,576,220 1 $9,052,454 $5,639,279 61% i .s 62791.10 (87) CITY OF ORONO KEY FINANCIAL HEALTH INDICATORS 1991 1990 1989 Curc«nt population Gross T»x Capacity* 7,303 7,213 $ 14,378,759 $ 12,892,214 7,379 S 14,351,809 Percent of Property Taxes Collected 95.6%96.4%96.4% City Revenues per capita $ (governmental funds) 468.52 S 485.58 $493.05 City expenditures per capita S (governmental funds) 543.97 S 476.83 S 445.64 Sstio of Bonded Debt to Tax Capacity (Excludes Revenue Bonds) 7.65%10.86%11.85% Bond Rating Aa 1 Aal Aal r- % Not# (*) Gross Tax Capacity replaces assessed value as the basis for extending taxes payable in 1989. (Net Tax Capacity for payable 1990 and subsequent years). y,.'V V pc.>- ■: k '■ BMinnlnq with 1J89 the terminology for Assessed Valuations Is by Tax Capacity, which is determined in the sane manner except using ssMller percentages for each property class. Mn The complete financial report available at the Orono finance office includes the detail of this published report. 1^ IpM -i ^liW" k - ‘ -f' ■ ,TT<’ ' 1^- i'. X.'X Wi .ii'#. pr .■'^ ■ . ' 4X;W'S:.' i':'-; X :'.’ ?|.i' /iijf'- i'X;: • ..•[-^^:;xxv-- v XX-.X "iv X- .V.* '■,i is; ».± • f>. "i. r SX' ^ ’I & 'vx rSs ^ i;x¥m ■XX> •-Tispcf e « I I I I I I I I i I I I Ih I I I m -,X;; S >«4 )>i iff?fiiiiiiiin| H IS'Me3 1.0 I s &• I I I I I I I I I •tNI i i«i I I I I I I I >« o _ . _ A VM ife ^ ^J3 I I • • ^ S I t I I I I s: I 3; t I I I ,.5.1.la I i LA ^ ^ I I 5 I 5^5 I 2 • 5a • I i it 5’ 3 ... S~ SSSPg .* S,5S.§I5§.-SS- I w c^ o :8 Ia Vu« LA III ;g t I I t I I I « • » • • • • ' • II » I I I I I I I I • I » ' ' • ' I I I I I I I I t I • t I • id d hSiiitSiiltfil 1 « s?crB D ff3 ^I ^ I? »■ I--5 a I ti f®l‘H^ 2. f *f I - in si' &[ I It Sh o •n I illn\ q3 ^ u* ^iir 11 I ■"TH 1 J V ■ V-- .. r' ■ : - "-•'K;W \ : N*a,o ftr’if :s'V l-?v. '-■M ■■%Vv&ra'. Ui /•*. W. '<■ m fe ffi'r ^■v VVS •aa HSB I I I I I s* e«a S I I I 8 I I • U %A *s w 3 f I ^ I I I i I I IS I I I V'w I I I I I I I i I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I t I * •I I is f i • I t I • <I I 0::i - ^ R; Rii^ cee*-r.i II If ^ L... V 1Ua w m »I3 mm * It II II II II II I I His I I I f I I U 1 i I I I I I a .1 Wl •• as II If 9 fliiiljll fciS a&H ^T-H ^ B.3 BS' K VA till E s ft sci s ? ol wl 04^' ^ III*I I I I I I I I *nI t W till I *o OI t I I I I ^ I I I I .1 K> t ^ I I 2 I I I K» to ilil ,.|-i.55Bd 5 %: S 5 « SJk III S I I • ' • ' • * I \9 I :3 * »I I I I I » • • • till I I I I I i I I i fttls;:- SSi^HsttsS liisBI 'SlllllSlS I S 258 * - -S’- ^la 2 !s 3 ts £ ?! 5 jg S s! 2 S ^ :J I f I g> i 11 I I a !JX ?f ms P I j V i A f..-S:fi- ffe:' ^•. :jfrmr 'K I t %Au* b » ifu » IS •«> >* 3 9 §” r»ffli^ *■'5 s.nu I |3'f Q ^ s*I S 0^ % . ?§ S I lis Iw » w I I jut >* Wl iS . .§ t I I , c> s ^ * s o ^® n3' 9 o* s -4 M W«Mu •4d 4l» .3 Ub Ml 4H ‘t f4« 2 d» •*4 • ^ t b w* •-• Ml ^ ^ A Oft <^ *'nI Vi Vi V» Oi O Ml -A ^ ^ ^ . !5 S 2 2 » N> K> Q»2 if I I ) • • s sv> 2 I I I I I < ) s e» I JS I I I I • • Ul Ml W 4>s I 2 I I t I I 3 9s SSi^tS'Sa s ~ -. *>« Ip Ml <w# * <h4 m 'bkSV* d V m V V SiSiSwfi S3 M ? ^ a sS n £5 <S* i: « • ig S S e S i?? n-r r- -5 3 S S" ^ S n g s .-s Mis5 ill ^ S ! 3 ft 3 14 o «o w <MKI 9> OB ^ 43 ^ -M ^1 I4i *•« Ml K> Mc•o M! Vk Ml 0» M: O Ml QB OiW M («*! M O s . ss ns « M M I V*w V*w 3 . . Ml M ■ «B 2* «i Mi O Mft » ^ 5 • i2 2 2 ills’R - i. a 3 3S<» *IS{< %i *4 — M M QV isl O OB —o ^ CB M Kl^ :2 <cOi OB ^ In- O *M I t ( t I I 2 i t tit w ^ Oi M V Id Wii* M K* m Ml M M o ■oI i A i ^ > I I I I I I M M •R* QNt -4 M ^ OB 3B M «i O ^ M S^'x '3i'3^'S's «« M — <»* M 8 SS if£ 8 ^ =!3slS ft 3 ft I 3 9II ■n I Hf? 7 P 4| 3 93 S*' r f B I? ft 1 5 aa ^1 a. i5 g 8 ??q| a -."^ JT jf •< R 1 8 ^ -^IM ^ '-i •*lill3 -f P e 2 d8 ^g. fr ,i ■; CTiY oroRor.o, Ma^nisarA k r- u .y I ir fi;r- Eiiictprite FuflUs CoQibinifig Suirmtot o( Rcveauc, Expciucs. ind Oun|fs io Rcuiacd Eantiogi Ywr Emkd December A1. 1991 ('»iih Cmrpraiive Toialt fo» Year Ended December .11, 1990) Sale; aad coei oi ulci Sales Cost of sales Gross prom Openiiag icvcauc Meieicd eraiCk ules User charges Cfteu fees Ei|ttipniciM renuil Other Total operating revenue Total grots pioTit and operating revenue Opcraling espeases rcssoul lertrkci SatattetMdwafes BaMnnal cmribuliom tkaMtaiidUfa coainbotions Satitr disposal charges frabaskmal ter%iccs Openiiag and maiatcrunce tuiplics Hal. light, and power Depreciation Real aad c^tiipovcni Mainaaaco aad repairs AdwiniUtalltsiaad other eapense AdnWsMii** charges bHaOMesalFand poWithirig, Mia*rw(isiag Other cqKBSea TmI qpeniiag etpeatet Operating iac orm (loat) (npense) 00 tave stase ats innMWa: Tsnai aooapemiag (aapease) Net iatoaie (toes) QnCi to ifcfmtotea oa coamtored ffwity reiMaed earnMtgt Waiff Operating S 111,199 1,911 157.112 157,112 62,721 6,601 2.40t 14.214 2.529 9.812 19.751 18.902 10,402 1.010 1,421 S 229 1.207 7.115 401 20afl2 (41.760) 7.165 70,126 (74.49^) (4t9) (2,CM) (41.0K) (9 Sewer Openttflf Golf Coune OpcmUif Touls 1991 1990 s S 13,846 12.061 S 13,846 11061 3 17,801 9.971 1.711 3.781 7.828 153.199 159.289 596.U8 -396,178 401,142 101.061 101,061 96.710 -24.090 24.090 28,645 50.^98 2.498 36.849 26,452 446.776 127,649 i*11.577 712.418 446.776 151.412 711.160 770,266 91 766 55.027 210416 163409 9.807 4.807 21.217 11141 .^.604 2."K2 3.7!9 7,152 --14.214 41066 16^.47^-165.475 161572 4 209 1.59.5 8,111 7.277 1.M6 4.995 18,141 11112 14 614 7 029 16.414 77.206 ni.879 4.919 175.700 173,147 -5.766 5.766 6.128 22.709 7.217 40.128 50.263 1.460 1.460 1.970 1.640 1.555 1.026 4,004 1479 54 69 ill 418 6^0 4au 3.111 1603 7.157 •18U164 1472 12.559 12,914 92.4M 10.068 1.2S5 1.075 2.739 1.960 475.109 |67.*71 741959 (26.111)H.43f (41634)(22.691) 12.831 20.216 I- 121,171 2.942 201.419 231736 13.192 -13.192 13,916 489 -489 713 9.3 M •9410 #430 (71755)-(147 J48)(Ul.aJ) -•(489)(713) H.93S)-(3.986)(UlO) -cm - 91.311 2.144 94449 113.09 61.190 23.611 43.7U 99466 ___^ii7:2*>4_254 149.647 16110 196.414 U.II7 296436 254411 Lin 5U •2.6!X»144*412 1,295401 LL2iL4ZL t !08.«4r uam I U<».«U 1- 5 - ifK*'- m^:: M lift; ft:- I fT :■ :6b:V1 ^4-^> LIST OF LICENSES FOR MEFTTNC OF VFOR council. APPROVAL Cjf^ <” July 13. 1992 /fo. % Special Event Permit - Rick Recker/St George Church Corn Days Foot Race August 9. 19^2 12:15<-1:00 p.m. *. riJjjDate;To: From: Subject: July 2, 1992 • • Ron Moorse, City Administrator Stephen X. Sullivan, Chief of Police Corn Days Foot Race I have re^iew«d the special event application in regard to the "Four Mile Road Run". I understand this is an annual event in conjunction with the Corn Days celebration, and as such, I have no objection to the issuance of this permit. It;?'-L<-ih''Permit :_Fee: S50.00 VARADBS & SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OP ORONO, MINNESOTA Phone Number! 3"^^ O^C>^ M«m«i JUL 1 1&'2 Address , \^ S Sr ^ City^ State, Zip: ^A>^^N S3^C:)]_________________ Locaclon of Parade or Event: Lo»*C, Va ^\vxcv >> ^ 9toON^ 1^, >0 lo ypJlt IZutL St. C<L>|V«.l CrtOtuj^_____________ Data of Event! ________________Hours of Event : - ipo9>\. Ineurance Company!Or-)K.)»(>iU.A. Amount:_^ Copy of insurance certificates to De submitted with this application. j Hm aware of all applicable State and other laws regarding parades and special events and will abide by same. I also agree to hold the City of Crono harmless from all liabilities that may arise dir .ctly or indirectly frOB the parade or special event approved by the granting of this permit. ffii^fieture croB Date • - Appro'.^ed t Denied :By: R^Mrks i ::r of cfdno OtFJCE • * ♦ * t tt —fo.w .“ili IL rnn T7T - . ^ - A .. ■ i m isX>l aOl : .■ - ^ V‘ ' ' :-■ 07/01/'- ft'I#- 'CS-' m hn---- ■•■ !• i.. lA .y> •; 'L....■.'-'-'.■■■i-r.:-. Uf I- u # ll 1 J ^r: £<■>«r *% >o.\1 % > A ^Mhi:iP-:: %*rt;.-.%tV-'*- ■< Mr & 07/05/92 PR CB PRREGOR 138 EHP • NAME 4716M060 474563339 476921919 471140671 475443662 476663143 472503991 469926026 476643367 475666721 4C6621016 466622640 472526007 461701666 507565424 469666562 466420632 469067664 474967612 475360151 477500666 475444249 477463677 472745694 366625356 471569663 473141624 477647279 475604753 504260307 472500574 121262417 475344512 460643542 476016974 477700023 334506261 477026779 473106426 496909535 476763251 470700901 469646107 47i909#29 470199529 499929164 475599177 297490042 472993051 474993299 470704904 479505292 496929469 500403192 477661539 P R ANDERSON. BRUCE L BOBZIEN. SUE A •09IS. SCOTT W BOSMA. JAMIE L BRINNMAUS^ JOHN F CARLSON. Stephen c CHESWICK. GARY B CORNXCK, JAMES L DELANEY. JANE E DEMBOOSKI. JAY C ENGLISH III, IRVING ERICKSON. DOUGLAS J ERICKSON, KURT R FISCHENliH. DAN r FRITZLER. JOHN M QAFFRON. MICHAEL OERNAROiON, JOHN OOPMN, DAVio J OREQORY, JAMES 0 HALLIN. DOROTHY M HANSEN. STEVEN C HANSING. CAROL J HASEMAN, CAROLE HEUER. JOHN C JENSEN. ROONEv W BRADLEY P FOREST J RICKY 0 JANICE M CHARLOTTE A KUEHN. tnOMAS M M4IUSTH, JEANNE A william E MCNICHOLi. DAVID L «j;LS JR WALTER M MOORSE, RONALD J MOROWCZVNSKI^ JAME3 NELSON DAVI6 D OAS. DANIEL O OBERAZONER. SCOTT G OBRIEN. RANDY L OMAN, LYLE E PALMER. GREGORY A QUASI. WAYNE A SCHOENMOPF. JOHN B SKREEN. DALE S STEFFENNAGCN^ RONALD SUUXVAN. STtPHEN X THOMTON. MARK R TQMCNECK. LAWRENCE F TOPCZYK^ MARK W VANG. bRuCE L VEI. LINDA S WALtERS. LINDA 0 WECKMAN. STEPHEN J JOHNSON JOSTROM KARNZTZ KENNEN. KNUTSON DPT YTO CURRENT GROSS GROSS 31 23384.12 1712 433113897.69 967 52313402.09 551 05127836 25 614 754221927 91 1566 5761862 00 504 003123154 40 1730 403124956 66 1666 ••93 1942 S3 317 633119460 06 1356 233123666 66 1632 0093204 00 120 003121314 04 1528 403124365 72 1731 003122S41 47 1676 993320047 02 1434 024226126 16 2120 69352201 50 169 354218676 05 1171 131217268 78 1235 294216134 20 1013 21317799 30 510 961211612 66 • 39 37611935 00 SIO 00931097 50 212 so3122206 29 1626 90931204 69 157 50312769 16 82 74313405 39 225 411513605 03 967 511529491.37 2109 61 93 31 93 12 31 35 93 42 92 33 42 92 9293 31 42 93 31 31 31 31 33 12 15 33 535.51 9627 SC 1416 25 29937 60 23367 62 2767 67 • 97 02 15056 61 16549 63 20046 91 14665 56 16711 41 16547.91 272 25 3776 16039 17266 26936 20106 21636 02 21236 64 17266 12905 16 15517 56 14410 21 63 13 1795 160 1322 99 242 00 2238 1691 202 232 1065 1054 32 1434 01 1001 60 1326 76 1539 94 90 40 03 73 • 6 26 04 347 11 46 1266 66 66 1239 26 13 1941 1260154274 02 1466 2664157271 73 1235 26 16 646 66 56 1145 26 ' 21 1030 10 61 615 35 mm mmmmmrnmmmmm- % l£> ^ ■•>’"• V 06/21/92 PR C8 PRREGOR 137 trf'EMP • NAME f ^.rrl 471888060 474563339 471840871 475443182 478663143 472503991 469526026 476043387 475969721 468821018 468622640 472529007 481701168 507585424 469686562 468420832 469087884 474667812 475380151 477500606 475444249 477463877 472745694 388625358 471569863 473141624 477647279 475604753 504260307 472500574 121262417 475344512 480843542 476018974 477700023 334506281 477026779 473108428 468909535 476783251 470700901 469148107 475382983 473746173 470516529 469629194 475569177 267460042 472563051 474663296 470704904 475505292 468629488 500403192 477881539 ANDERSON. BRUCE L B08ZIEN. SUE A BOSMA. JAM’E L 8RINKHAUS. JOHN f CARLSON. STEPHEN C CHESWICK. GARY B CORNICK, JAMES L DCLANEY JANE C DEM80USKI JAY C ENGLISH III IRVING ERICKSON. DOUGLAS J ERICKSON, KURT R riSCHENICH DAN T ERITZLER. JOHN M GAFFRON. MICHAEL P GERHARDSON JOHN R OOMAN, DAVID J GREGORY. JAMES D HALLIN. DOROTHY M HANSEN STEVEN C MANSXNG. CAROL J HASEMAN CAROLE HEUER JOHN C JENSEN ROONEY W JOHNSON BRADLEY P JOSTROM FOREST J KARNITZ. RICKY 0 KENNEN JANICE M KNUTSON, CHARLOTTE A RUEHN. THOMAS M MABUSTH. JEANNE A I«xntyre william E MCNICHOLS. DAVID L WALTER H NOOtSE, RONALD J iJfOjCZVNSKX JAMES NELSON. DAVI6 D OAS. DANIEL 0 SCOTT G09RXEN RANOY L OMAN LYLE E PALMER. GREGORY A OUAST. WAYNE A RATHBUN. BARRY J SCMOENNOFF JOHN B SKRECN. DALE S STEFFENHAGEN RONALD SULLIVAN. STEPHEN X thomton. mark R TOMCNCCK. LAWRENCE F TOMCZVK MARK W VANG. BRUCE L VEE LIW>A S WALTERS. LINOA Q WECKMAN STEPHEN J YTO DPT GROSS 31 21671 69 31 12910 i7 12 7221 SO 42 20359 34 61 373 00 31 21424 00 31 23289 20 93 1624 90 31 18103 83 31 21858 66 93 84 00 31 19787 64 31 22884 72 31 20862 48 33 18613 00 42 26007 49 35 2032 15 42 17506 92 12 16033 47 42 15120 99 31 7266 34 12 10973 31 «1 1425 00 93 885 00 31 20577 39 93 1047 39 31 2708 47 CURRENT GROSS 1526 987 560 1564 378 1648 1841 343 1444 SO 1565 70 84 1526 1498 1599 1434 04 1885 89 147 1128 1235 1185 545 839 600 292 40 52 65 56 00 00 19 88 00 40 83 04 51 80 29 20 58 36 00 50 1497 84 149 63 31 3179 98 225 411 15 12117 52 987 5iIS27381 76 2109 803323309 34 1795 8593375 38 215 25318304 51 1365 78931174 25 200 751227699 20 2038 403121476 59 1750 60352564 94 167 3393664 14 92 004213971 83 1091 209215495 51 1054 331319612 90 1434 014213693 96 1245 749218381 65 1429 499?IS006 17 1054 32313430 93 247 204214783 71 1013 219316034 68 1235 213124697 01 1941 123119293 96 1469 293120366 74 1469 213119667 13 1497 843316033 45 1235 281211951 28 946 871514372 30 114$ 283313379 41 1030 10 59.063 87 to • ■0- •- <»• » ^.‘<1 to ID ID ID tn M ►-» Kl ID I/I K) O i/I ID lil 09 •H CD ID CDIDCDCDCDIDIDtOlDIO ^/li/iiTi/M/'i/'i/liTi/ii/i ID i/» CJCJU»U)U>CJI*>C/C*>U) ID Lfl ^J i/» ir> i'' a O to i/I o mo «o o •V''‘ i.*'- • ■” • ' :•*:u: 1-' : ;.’•' ■•' ■■ ■ ■■ ^ ;'.. -■»: -i ■ ’ -I•» * I IIPfe!»- l¥-.' i0S'Mt- <1 ^H:-'K' ?•' |■■:C ■Pa. , fW''I# g%- ,> t-'i't'W p# fi} -‘ Biw:-'? '■■mpp# ;.-r vP. P- F.|-' ,'il i ^P^::fep m'-S:- W ||»- II ypl'-: 'la J M mm • • m m WUI WU> oo oo K»M WM^- • • • ►-►-o MM ss §§ MMno 00 MM 1 I >o§! t • MM I I MM MM ,,,v ^ , f- : m i mm 9 m m 9 O Ul M O M »m• m m m O iO K) iJ^KT OO OO OO Xmz o -n M o M < I M M f O O » 40 if^ N) O # O 1*m o CD rsj U«4/» WO MO X >r-r* M os o o IOo KJ 00 M »» » » m O ooo CD fs» oo X > tl T» -< CD S -H > -Hc o X M "O cocoiOUt MKI OO '«*J ^ oo CD CO rsjfsj M OOiO O ^00 oooooo oooo "01D XXmrn CD CD m w ogX rnm OO >> r- f- X O C«Ci M X CC r*•>H|XXwmm >CD O m m m mm mm IO coco CD CO C/1CD4D CD tD fs>MK>rsJKi KMS»N>ISIKJ »M »M M M ji ►— »-*p M•IO ID CD CO p COCO »o CO•CD p CD CD CD p CD ID p X CO •M p MM M •MM p m M »W »CD D CD 9 MM p o »p WWW m OO p :x r> O '«4 CO IP CO CD CD fsjroKi f^>N> CO Kl CD CD CD fSJKJN) ID M •^M C/*M CDO lOfO WM OOoooo CJ K> OWCJM NICDMCD •^K) M W LJ ^ OOK) KJCD mOO OO OO mocdcd OTCD O CD cc;c»czxxcx MMM OM -ri -n-flcDsss s o p—MM MMMmm 1 «• 1 1 « • 1 1 JN W #p W Jik Jp M w M MMMMM W o oo MMM JPM M W W Mm 1 (1 •1 « 1 1 t o CD CD CD CD CD CD M M W WJP W WMMW o M WCO oww WW 1 •» ♦« • • 1 t w COW WWWMM M M*-»(U> M *-► *-*M OOO C*l c«» I CD CO 0 1 iO u> • I I N»fS»M WC^C4 M»s>m f f • 0<^ CO ♦ * OO oo •>4 ID CD N)N> CDCF) ^ fsJOM CDm M MCJCD ooooo O o o o mm o mmm m m 0*9»P«0»»*r*XXX mm m ccc MMM OO O X X X w w ID ID CD (DID >n't m m MM im D"i re*!w w sow WW WWW r*i <<<<<X WWW M -4 -C CD ID CD onssM MM MMoooooDn m m m M CD (DID CD CD m nonID w w -4 ooo OO f-m CD ID n WWW WO >]0 D*f“XwWWW02 M -4 M -4 ex CD ID CD Wm W mO m o> X mm M KlfSI • • MM UIM f I CDiD COW f « p p p •p p p p p p **p p p p p p •p p t f> V n 1 O ♦o tn > o X .Ji Jt Ji Ji X CD Ol CD cD t-CD m X om ¥1 O 8 1 S M M •H -< O ^ ;;; S o Xmo m O M ID O M M » W M 1 ■a J a ^y- Ir m m » m w m m «0 (OCD UIUIOI IDfDf0 WUICJ OOO^ OOO K>fSlM *^U> ii» *il» KJ K»OOK> ssss UE mmm KKX SIIS K/OO Ml****^ I I • 4b a»ai UIU»K» ^ W%^ •»» ►* M • • • «kbi»K» Oi^4i 4 4 • 8 44* Nl m m m w 9 <T 4/1 iP 0 »►—►— •—••I-* y*0 •ID 4D 40 4D 4D 0 CO ID ID »ID ID • •I/I 4/11/1 V/) V/1 »4/1 1/1 vn •vr O'• 0 0910I019I »91 9) 91 •91 91 • »91 0 919191 •91 9» 91 »Ul U>% •ID 40 ID ID 40 •Kl •eo o»• O mu% o D (/Io Xm o o I I I 8 b » » ooooo o oo ooooo «i«iO» OD 00 O O0 OO 00 O0 4POI0 4D40 K> <0 ID K>NI f^hbh4MfM m m O VO COno OOOOO <m ODGO nif*4s S 1/14/1 Si 4/14/1 XXon n > < m -p 90 39 00004/1 o Xoooo 0010 *9^•p 4/1 ooooo oo • III! fS4M0abJU« « #4 00000 1 • I I I ^ <0 O o ^4 fmo till! b04i# W WO O I o I I ib lb bJK* W VJ N4KI • • KJfSJ 040) OO « I OO (l S » » Io JR 4/» O O ID 40 Kj ro 2,0112,011Ob*9191►— *— 0b»^ W OM/1 Kl 00 0b -*b O ifiui bJVJ ID9I9191N90 MOIOID WO 1 0 •— 9— OO ID 04D^- IDID O*-o^- 0 ••» "P ‘P JO 30 > > m m -n -01 4A4/* m m O 908 'PO o g* Sim n X. ni O CJ w b,14Sl bJN» • f v#*0 ID O 040 I t 4D^ LJO« O J4 40» IDiDIDIDIDIDtDID tnv/^v/'i/ii/'v/'v/’vf) Cf4 04 04 Ol C0 CF4 0O ej K) K> N> N/ OOOOOOOO OOOOOOOO ODO0000O00O0OIO0 I0IDIDID4DIDID4O KirsiK>bJNJK>f^lN> K> ►- IDVJK>*^|bVJ^IDUl KIcnCJi/IKlCJO^-^ O40O(DU»»^f^^O 0«^004-J^0^-»4-J 0C7»0»OOOOOO OOOOOOOO nonnnnno nnonnosno ElUllll onnononn /Pf0irnf0if0i/0ir0ifp cccccccc 4/1 </></) 4/14/14/14/14/1 OOOOO KJ ►— 1 t I I » < « • D> » D»4^|ii 0»W ^ Kl » t I I 4 ( • • C0V0b4^*>*POO 90i0»^iSlO4iJp K O<Dlb«0IDlDO I « t I t I I < 04D teV0W^»**O vj bjl *M> I/I fs^ Q in 91 O O 00 40 N> v/» vn oo OO o O OO 39 4/1 » m •p > m *P O « I K» ID * Ow n 90 n Ji 9i mopc K3 o o > o-n o 90o Xo rnx; o nr S i 91 ISS o X o PC 39rn O %A m O O w 0i K^ s ■imaaii A-■ • .^-•J I.23 • ^ P' P--' % ^c=V. ^J'-' r-' & i^- W P: ■• - wB. 0 w kJ vn \£d Lii 'S3i 4=:^g COUNCIL MEETING JUL 13 1»M CITY OF ORONO W ‘ MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT P.O, tot St7, Wayzata. Minntsota 55391 ___Itniaimpi-Jainw R Spansiay Prn •JotmE TNynas • n<crun) R Miiier Milt 0. frtBkton • C Wbodrow iMt • CUrkion Ltnoiey • T^or^u Maoie. Jr llfl MtMNfTOMM ft. y mlr July 2.1992 Mr. Ronald MoorM Orono City Administrator P.O. Box 66 Ciyatal Bay, MN 55323 0066 JUL 6 19S2 SUBJECT: Trunk Highway 12 Corridor Otar Mr. Moorse At Uit rtquest of Jenn Mabusth, I have enclosed a copy of a memorandum which was rtvitwed at the regularly scheduled June 18. 1992 meeting of the Board of Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The memorandum addresses the impacts on wetlands of the Trunk Highway 12 corridor alternatives which were available from the MNDOT in May 1992. I understand that modifications to the alternatives which may alTect the conclusions of this memorandum have been made. Future modifications may alee be made which coulo greatly affect the conclusions. The Board will Mntinue to participate throughout the environmental review process, as well as monitor the project construction for conformance with District standards which seek to provide the ‘’minimal impact” on the water resources of the District. The District will anforce its rules in order to fulfill the responsibility for which the District was formed. If you have any questions, please feel fr*e to contact me at 473-4224 Sincerely. JAMES M. MONTGOMERY. CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Engineers for the District Ronald S. Qvuuibeck, P.C. District Engineer crs ee:Board L. Smith Ip? •'if- :?t:' ?%- l^‘‘ ^'\ fy fe W' W 1^' ii. lU. Wt r B' '■ 07^ ■ m:- '■ iv '■"' ’ I- JAMES M. MONTGOMERY. CONSULTING ENCINTERS, INC. MEMORANDUM TO:Ron Quanbeck FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: Tom Rasmussen Preliminary Review of Tnxnk Highway 12 alternative routes May 28. 1992 PURPOSE At your request. I have performed a preliminary review of the proposed T.H. 12 corridor alternatives within the MCWD. In the original document submitted to the MCWD (dated December 31, 1991) from Howard. Needles, Tammen and Bergendoff (HNTB), twenty-two altemativca comprised of various road segments where identified as potential routes for T.H. 12. 1 contacted HNTB and obtained an up-to-date draft scoping decision document in which nine alternatives, comprised of different combinations of eight nght-of-way segments, are proposed going into the environmental impact study phase of the alternative decision making process. It is important to note that the proposed routes are preliminary in nature and are by no means finalized. The purpose of this memorandum is to determine if an alternative that appears to have the leaat impact on the surface water resources of the MCWD. DESCRIPTION There are six segments that affect the MCWD. The corridor is to be 350 to 400 feet wide. The six segments ere shown in Figure 4 as provided in the draft scoping decision document and are briefly described as follows: Segmeol B:Segment B begins east of Long Lake and proceeds south of Long Lake. It continues northwest through Orono and continues northwesterly towards Maple Plain. The western portion of this route is located north of and generally follows Wate. 'own Road. Segment F:Segment F follows the existing T H 12 corridor and would expand the existing corridor width to 350 to 400 feet wide This segment would go directly through downtown Long Lake and west towards Lake Classen StfOMmt O:S^ment G begins at Femdale Road and proceeds northwesterly through the Waysau Country Club Golf Course. It then follows a westerly route immediately fiWftK of (he existing County Road 6 Segment G heads west until it arsects with segment F, east of Lako Katrina. Segment J Segment J is r northwesterly route contained withm the existing T.H. 12 corrider and would tie into either segment G or F. Segment J would go through downtown Maple Plain. Segment K: Segment K extends either s«jrment G or F west to ward the east end of segment L located south of Maple Plain .J I. i ■ j'-F-:-- .. "■I#.- r. jM-i- %>‘|-‘'T?^.'..-r-- " ■ 'm:.' wt 'W'. ■ W-r mmy-' #iv ' -^:- '’'■/ iti, !?■ ik: I; ^: -; V-'y \* • w :. '•#L* ScgiDsnt L: Segment L ptcks*up the traffic from either segment B or segment K and continues in a northwesterly direction, past Maple Plain, up toward Delano. To analyse the potential impacts that these routes may have on wetlands within the MCWD, I obtained aerial photographs from the City of Wayzata for each of the alternatives proposed. I superimpoead the final alternatives onto U.S.G.S quadrangle topographic maps for the six segmenta within the District. I overlaid the U.S.G.S quads with MDNR wetland delineation shaeta and detarmined the wetlands that may be affected by each segment. These are summarized aa follows: Sagment B Sagmant F: Segmant J: MDNR protected wetlands 835W, 857W and 918W. MDNR protected wetlands 830W, 831W, 84IW, 916W and 396W. In addition, the following MDNR protected waters, 154P, 160P and 162P, would also be affected by this route. This segment could potentially affect MDNR protected wetlands 396W, 916W and protected water 154P. negllieiil K: This segment could potentially affect MDNR protected wetlands 916W and 918W. Segment L: No MDNR protected wetlands would be affect«?d by this segment DISCUSSION Teble I summarises the preliminary advantages and disadvantages of the segments comprising the TJL 12 corridor study. SegBiMit B: Segment f; Segment G Segment J: The primary advantages in segment B is that it appears that it could be designed in such a way to minimize the impact on wetlands, in addition, the District should also coordinate placement of a water quality structure at the crossing of Lake Classen outlet creek. The primary disadvantage of segment B is that it would affect some wetlands. Particularly South Katrina Marsh as it is currently aligned. The primary advantage of segment F is that it would follow the existing corridor reaulting in a smaller area of land disturbance activity. However, a major diaadvaatage to this segment is that it would directly place fill in the Long Lake floodplain. The advantagae ateociated with sagment G could include a slight shift in the proposed route farther north to avoid MDNR protacted waters. In addition, the District could coordinate with tha MnDOT to construct a water quality struaure at tha crossing of Wolsfeld Laka outlet creek. The primary disadvantage of this segment is that is hat to eonnoct to either segment J or K (discussed below) which both have major wetland impacts. As with togmeot F. the pnmary advsLntage is that it follows the existing corridor and would have a smaller area of land disturbance However, tha Lake Katrina wetlands could be greetly impacted by this route. Fill would undoubtedly be placed within tho Lake Katrine floodplain and Type 111 wetlands. t i|ii itB f f SafnMat K:The primary advantage of segment K would be the fact that it would provide access to segment L which has no impact on any wetlands or floodplain. However, to access segment L, segment K would directly dissect two MDNR protected wetlands. Segment L:As previously mentioned, the primary advantage of segment L is that no wetlands or floodplaina within the MCWD are affected. The primary disadvanUge of this would be erosion associated with land disturbance activities due to the corridor and road construction. CONCLUSION Bated upon the preliminary advantages and disadvantages of the segments previously discussed, the following conclusions are made: * The E J.S. alternative, which causes the least impact on the surface water resources of the MCWD is obviously alternative 1. the ”no build* alternative. Of the build altemativea, it appears that the combination of section B L (alternative 3B) would prove to be the alternative that has the least negative impact for the MCWD. The proposed corridors and their alignments are preliminary in this stage. Further review should be performed throughout the Environmental Impact Study process in regard to the rules and regulations of the MCWD. If you have any questions, contact me at ext. 215. k’’ ‘ ^ :;,?v: [i'^r,. E"' pS:' IM-I M »l'.- /■®. '-'.■■■^vV- - -:.^>': ■ ’■^iH ’■> i---' ■: ' •i - - ^ ^.; P, -: 'i^r.v r- e T" : .teia" TABLE 1 Preliminary Advantages and Disadvantages of the Segments Comprising the TJBL 12 Corridor Stud AAnrSupii n t« H vn n ta iFM B • Would affect only fringe* of wetlands. . Could be shifted farther southwest so it would not affect South Katrina Marsh. • A water quality structure could be placed at crossing of Lake Classen outlet creek. • Does impact 3 MDNR wetlands and some small type 2 wetlands. • Potential erc.*ion problems. F • Follows existing corridor. • Smaller area of land disturbance. • Places nil in Long Lake. • Affects 6 MDNR wetlands and Lakes. G • Water quality structure would be placed at crossi::g of Wolsfsld Lake cutlet creek. • Could De slightly shifted ftirther north to avoid protected waters. • Affects 3 MDNR protected waters. • Potential erosion problems. • Has to coimact to segments J or K which have msuoi* wetland impacts. J • Follows existing corridor. • Smaller area of land disturbance. • Would encroach into Lake Katrina wetlands. - Would likely cause northerly shift of Baker Park trail into Lake Katrina wetlands. K - Would provide access to segment L . Would directly dissect 2 MDNR wetlands. L - No MONK wetland* are impacud.• Land disturbance activities. H:: ii?: liC •' r ’■*- t-.- # vijhtme :4^ ■’ :/'■ ^ vr -- LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Environment Committee AGENDA -iUL 8 1952 8:30 am, Tuesday, July 14, 1992 City of Wayzata Council Chambers 600 Rice St. , Wayzata <1 block south of Wayzata Blvd at Broadway) 1. 2. Welcome and introductions. Committee Chair JoEllen Hurr Lake Monitoring Subcommittee progress on summary reports of data collection for Lake Minnetonka, Carolyn Dindorf for Subcommittee Chair Dick Osrood; 3.Trunk Highway 12 corridor alternatives and impacts on wetlands affecting Lake Minnetonka as developed for the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District by James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Hurr and Tom Maple; 4.Agency, city and lake asscclation/organlzation reports on current water quality issues; 3. Additional business; 6. Next meeting date 7. Adjournment 0'I- h I I:I S,S'rI-' !• P" l" I iI. fh' ’•" LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Environment Committee Minutes 8:30 am, Tuesday, June 9, 1992 City of Wayzata Council Chambers PRESENT: ABSENT: LMCD Chair Dave Cochran, LMCD Board mef^bers T’om Reese, George Owen, city repre-ientutives Frank Kelly, Greenwood; Bill Englehardt, Deephaven; Jay Blake, Minnetrista; Mike Gaffron, Orono; agency representatives Tom Maple, Loren Larson, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District; Carolyn Dindorf, Hennepin Conservation District; Dick Osgood, Freshwater Foundation, Tom McDowell, Hennepin Parks; Beverly Blomberg, Lake Minne tonka Lakeshore Owners Assn., Executive director Gene Strommen; Board members JoEllen Hurr, Dcug Babcock, Scott Carlson. James Grathwoi, Tom Penn, Bob Rascop, cities of Excelsior, Minnetonka. Minnetonka Beach, Moi -d, Shorewood, Spring Park, Tonka Bay, Victoria, Wayzata and Woodland; agency representatives .rom Carver Soil & Water Conservation District, MN PCA, Board of Water i Soil Resources, MN DNR, Gray Freshwater Biological Institute.. MINUTES REVIEW. Following introductions, minutes of the 5/12.'92 meeting were accepted, with attendance corrects o show Doug Babcock, Spring Park, piesent. LAKE nOHITORING SUB-COMMITTEE. Material Chair Dick Otgood was reviewed, namely a 5/i^/92 . outline 5/19/92 "Plan of Attack" and a 6/1/92 1st meeting outline addressing a proposed comprehensive monitoring network on Lake Minnetonka, all items sent in advance o all Environment Committee members. Nelson MCWD, questioned the lake monitoring oelng used to SoiiS on trltMitary .tre.r.., H. believe, monitoring an streams should be done, concurrent with I'^ke monitoring. til conc.rnaM th.t thw .tody outoom. .Ill pot p.rlorm.nc. goals on the rtresms without knowing what la them. This requires sophisticated monitoring equipment •nd/oi l®chnIcian«• Helson slso pointed ou» that « benchmark" and goal" a-e used Nelson sees a goal being set Irom benchmark dara. t 'j the c o f.’ w 1 ’ t byHCWO resource dato was then presente . , _ A cAsrt lUu.trot.d P —• t Pr...nt ProJ.c,. (ro» rv K-; i ■ It ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE, MINUTES. 6/9/92, P. 2 1967 to 1995. A second chart outlined Future Projects up to 2002. Four of these Future Projects are specific to Lake Minnetonka. A number of detailed reports were : llustrated. Conunittee members were invited to review them. An outline of typical MCWD projects included its 509 Plan, Grays Day Outlet Control Structure, Minneapoirs Chain of Lakes Monitoriny, Long Lake Clean La'tes/Ciean Water Pa-tnership, Gleason Creek, EPA Wetland Studies, Painter Creek and Waterway Maintena..ce and Repairs highlights. Since 1988, MCWD reports ore included in Storette computer network available through the PcA. Englehart commented that this committee should define its purpose so that it does not overlap with i ther government authorities. This committee could serve as a depository for for various agency environment information. Cochran agrees. Maple recognizes the committee could produce needed additional information. The committee should know what it wants Lake Minnetonka to be in advance of its studies. Reese points on the committee could move ahead on some projects to assist MCWD. Maple pointed out MCWD does have certain taxing authority which its board could exercise. Osgood does not see the subcommittee data collection oo an overlap. If other da a is there, the committee needs to find it he points out. He is aware of the past 25 years of dota. Past data is supported by few samples which has a limiting effect on the data value*, does not answer very many questions Osgood further observes. Me sees the main task as that of getting everything together, determine the beat approach for data collection to guide future lake management. Dindorf agrees and sees the low-ccst approach to many samples on a high frequency basis over many years being slgniflcont. Use of LMLOA voluteers are partIcuiar1 • valuable. n agrees the data accumu.atlon presently prop.sed is good. He eeeo much variability In the yearly results, and when the data shows det< loratlon in a span of some five years he fears valuable tl-e will be lost to corrzet pioblem. He supports beginning tributary monltorlno -I thl lime. He notes ha* eve ^ basic monitoring la cost.ly. a dollar range of »20. Ow'O to 000 con be expected. Englehart sees the need to Xf^ow what is causing the problem He asked how the mansge'-^ent plsnfrom the tributaries first addr funding r*. mor.it or Ing plarrs. Strommen and Cochrnn responded ttmt LMcD requiring legislative or other support w will secule It igencles rev jed i';' m:. IT m. •:* :-: i¥’ »■ I." u I€ bs. vu. r it. m li" '& V---' Pfe ■ilv .- S7 »■ p. '^‘11 ■■ PO ‘fe., I.:;::-;-:. tf P inllliliii iiiir ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE, MINUTES, 6/9/92, P. 3 funding to provide for governing responalbll1tlea aflecting Lake Minnetonka. Agenciea Identified aa "lead agency" for the various Management Plan objectives will likely require funding to achieve them. Maple understands that MN PCA is putting the burden oi financing .torm water control programs on the clt^ s, wh^le It collects the S85 fee for the permit to regulate them. At the same time PCA is not adequately staffed to follow-up on the permits It issues. It also has a directive to reduce non~polnt pollution sources by 40’/, but there la no standard by which to measure the 40’/. reduction. Maple added that the •day of the trophy lawn" la over. Cnglehart further pointed out the difficulty a city like Deephaven Is experiencing in managing storm water, having no ponding areas In which to collect it. LAKEWATCH ACTION. LMLOA was identified for their ability to help educate lake shore property owners on environmental concerns. They can also attract volunteers for collecting we er data. LMLOA board appro''ed a 1/2 share of the $x, 000 Lakewatch cost. It was the subcommittee's concensus that the LMCD board should also participate In a 1/2 share. Oagood reviewed his role in training volunteers doing the sampling and observing as well aa data assembly and reporting. The concensus was to recommend LMCD's participation. STYROFOAM DRAFT ORDINANCE. The City of Orono has drafted an ordinance to govern the use of styrofoam in doc'-s, presented by Mike Gaffron. Fragmentation has created a llttei which is considered more of a nuisance than envlronmen a hazard, particularly as it accumulates along shoreland. ordinance appears to have application for , bordering Lake Minnetonka. It was suggested Orono circulate the draft copy to the cities. The committee recognized ordinance as a valuable step tn solving this prob em. AGENCY REPORTS. There were no aidltlonal reports The next meeting waa set for 8:30 am. Tuesday. July 14 adjournment. The meeting waa ndjaurf.ed at 10; *0 Res pec t f u 1 ly o u b m i_t v ) Executive Directoi y / / f ^ ‘U. L t ^ - V f:-.to' ^rdl',:.. %m 2. if?" Mf tk£ is. fcP''£:«? Sr.-' a. mm- 7^^V.'' PP''^te- 1. ip '-V'y-’W/S ?. ip« % r* t LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT \1 J water STRUCTURES COMMITTEE AGENDA 7:30 AM Sacurdar, July 11, 1792 Norwast Bank Bldg. 900 E Wayzata Blvd. Rre (Elavator accttt for handicapped, uae want antranca, Wayzata Blvd) nsJUL 2 1S92 1. Bit Xsiaad, Ine., Mahpiyata Island. Orono: Public Hearing Report for now Multiple dock license for 14 boat storage units Multiple dock licenses, subject to village certification A. Bortll Shore Orieo Hariea, Maswell Bay, Orono; renewal with minor change par attached eeaio R. Lekeoide Narine, Maxwell Bay, Orono; renewal without change, subject to as'built survey C. Roger Nikeer, Wayzata Bay, Wayzata; does not plan to renew his Multiple dock license-will have less that five boats Hapseta Taeht Club, Site i, Wayzata Bay. Wayzata; new site plan dated 6/18/92, replacing proposed platforn shown on 11/5/86 site plan with a smaller seasonal make ready dock, 6 x 40 4. Discussion of Orono's ordinance regarding the use of non-encased Styrofoam in Dock Construction St Dissuasion of Greenwood's ordinance regarding storage of coswercial watercraft at residential sites g, Saviaw of variance fee of $500, presentation by Chair Babcock Review of peraanent dock definition; staff recoeeends making the definition the sane as the DNR peraanent dock definition, see m- Suhcomaittee report on study of non-restricted watercraft and glldgg at Multiple docks and off-lake storage f. Suhcv'XMJttaa report on review of eapanded sales at dock console fac«Ut^ and dock width for gas docks (Meeting Tuea.. 7/7, 8:00 aal 10* Staff recoM®endations on Section 2.09 Deicing Equipment, per me 11. Sect. 2.03 Nwltipie Dock licenses and Sect.2.09 Special Density llgamaaa, discussion of eomeittee concern for new multiple dock new special density licenses not installed aed II, Additional buaieess racoeevodad by the c->eeittee f/l/ft m I LAKE HINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Public Huaringt Big Island, Inc., Hahplyata Island, Orono, Lovsr Laks South Nsw Multiple Dock License for 14 Watercraft /mr- 0-'- Mssting Hslds •• ; ■ 1f> . ■< -• 7i00 pm, Wednesdiy June 24, 1992 Tonka Bay City Hall ■» . * ^ . « ■ ' ;. -i H*ab«ra Present: Chair David Cochran, Greenwood; Thomas Reese, Hound; Douglas Babcock, Spring Park; George Oven, Victoria; William Johnstone, Minnetonka; Thomas Penn, Tenlce Bay; Executive Director Eugene Strommen; Administra' tive Technician Rachel Thibault. Chair Cochran convened a Public Hearing at 7:07 pm to consider the natter of a new multiple dock license application by Ralph Hatch, Big Island, Inc., for 14 boat storage unitu (BSU) at its site on Hahpiyata Inland, Orono, an Lever Lake South. Thibault explained that Big Islar.u, Inc., ii. bm vfsociation of shareholders in a five acre t *.*.3t of l'-*'d tn g Island with over 1,S00* of ahoreline frontage. The application is for two decks to accommodate 14 slips. Xnfersatien furnished with the application states that there will be two separate dock structures. There is a 60* dock adjacent to the svimaing area with two trantien*^ spaces proposed for that dock. The remaining 12 slips would be located at the easterly*sost dock. Ten slips would be for Iransient use, with four slips for overnight storage for persons venting to caap The City^lbf Orono has approved a conditional use permit ICUPI for day*uM recreation, vith occasional overnight camping, for the property, subject to certain conditions. The CUR also provides for a maximum of 13 BSU. An application for a 10V3 Joint use dock license has been submitted to the City of Orono by the applicant. iswe ^ ‘ w Toe Judd, attorney, and Ralph Match, treasurer for Big island, Xno., vere present on behalf of the applicant. Judd said Big Island. Inc., was established seven or eight years ago. Rost of the shareholders are from the Lake m?pl2t!^u^*ae volley*^ball^and*picnlclng primarily on ve^liday evenings and weekends. There is a structure on the property which is used occasionally for overnight guests. The desks have been in place off and on for a numher of peare« JufM said the average daily use is two to four beats I e-t - - i-v V‘-’'v ''■ J*''': k- ^ • • i' ■ w' :i>; ♦ ,Ck r:v. '.'^: SIm.; ai:- : r «• ff»* V • Big Island Inc., Public Hearing Report, 6/24/92> Page 2 at the dock. In response to a question from Oven, Judd said the use of* l> Trespassing* signs and observation by the owners preve^ s outsider use. Match said there are 29 shareholders, 24 from the iasediate area. Cochran asked whether there is a current sultiple dock llosnse* Thibault responded that the applicant was not aware of the need for a license. The LhCO was sade aware of the situation by LHCO staff observations of sultiple dock use on oeeaaiens and by the City of Orono through its CUP. CoGhran called attention to the conditions in the Orono CUP. Don Osrsanson, Lake Hinnetonka Lakeshore Owners Association (LNLOA) sentioned the lighting at this site. Hatch said they are willing to sake any adjustments necessary to avoid any inoonvoniance to the public. He said most of the lighting is away fros the Lake. Hail Castagna, LHLOA and MN Lakes Association (HLA) stated it was the hope of the organizations he represents that the LHCD* in looking at the multiple dock issue, would look at ovarerovding and density. He asked the Board to be cautious in adding sultiple docks on the Lake. Hatch said that except for July 4th and perhaps one other occasion there will not be suGh use. Rost of the slips are transient, with the majority of boats already stored on other parts of the lake. He does not bsliawa any of the shareholders trailer boats from outsids Lake Hinnstonka. BabGOGk obsarvad that the slip size report for Big Island, Znc* does not contain the width dimensions of the slips. The report indioates only the length because all of the slips are tie-ons. Thibault suggested using the maximum width dimension for a slip length category in the Water Storage Units definition to complete the slip size report. Babcock said this should be done. There were no other comments from the public. Cochran closed the PubXio Hearing at TtlS PH and referred the application to the Water Structures Committee meeting on July 11, 1992. Findingsi 1.Big Island, Inc., represented by Ralph Hatch, treasurer, and Attorney Tom Judd, has submitted a multiple dock lieense application for 14 slips on the association's property on Hahpiyata Island, Orono, Lover Lake South. 2. The property on Hahpiyata Island is owned by 29 shareholders that make up Big Island, Inc. There is approximately 1900 feet of shoreline at this site. -.7 "• Pt ' .lp'\V^^-:'-5vV^'#VeJt5#s5-.,ifer " ■•ig island Xnc.,Public Haaring Report* : v^' ^I'iy ^'^'M-y*t >#,:t!:tA-. iWMiif»yy : , m,.^. itm-.- ,„ . .'.aw» 6/24/92* . ,I *r. - ^ Ma<« Page 3 •• -«r • rwi -'y •* ' T"^r .-:v=_ e e' * «r ^jp -• ^ '' ■ ■ ' ^ - .. v.^ . .-r-. ............... «...-.. ■ 3. " The application la for teo dock structurea f®®®""®®**® : '■■YT^ ^ .♦•■ 'V ^ . . .B ,^TIi«iClty of Orono hoo opprevod o CUP lor foy-»o* ®sS';&SSp5opOOtlon olth oeooolonal owornlpht cooping, v An £3^ , ^^’^t^^iSi^'appllcatlon lor a Joint uae dock llcenae haa baan to tha city. Tha city haa reatrlcted *tha.^al^^ 14 allpai tan tranalent and four overnight atorage . .0* , r ... #4 ■ •apaoaa. V >i- ■ >i^•> •<i;* .../-.: i< -vi. »i^Cto,aTaajilaua of 15 boat'alipa •A »J4* -14. •Tfc: > 9. Tha docka are Crapeau docks* seasonally removed -4^,- ;<ii' tSI. ■ >■ ■*■ ■' ■ ’: >' «.*i»Vi :'.- * : ■.. ..A- pa. >f. ,*^,- I ■•■>>■,-'.f!^ " Pi&h^ .,. ;r; .-■; _ ; j|jr - -.ao^ .'dnww' v.. . v»d>.r.-4i*.. - 1»** d*. •* m-«. ^ oV-^.. # .. :..^. .. . 4^-- ■• <^WMf m -■\'- !►«>*>: ■ 4-V 4- ' ■- *9' ■ -'Sfc'W ■.* r^i f.-.:jhir 1^ ..^ .— Ai ~ ~e - rST^rdl^ ir ^ ^ Ska*. -o^SIda % 'iMite ^L^.*o1 koasuiMAWi^ -..atfflHittBHRl ./.. —- ^ - - __-o* . ,.- A. ^ ‘ djAMr. -i&ii - ,i an- - - •-y . •. r 1*4ftd/^Pr •''■• * ’ fe: •; i^' 4 ‘‘ 5T ' Ail «* V -rttrV 4ii4(pk .• •>..> ■s'I ,f> ..... > "li.io >1^-, ) ^4(s, % %. ■Jk* V -.•■ « ’ awi- .'>:» ■ rpi-j.-ir ;s^. .- JSegrn ! ^ ^ ....... 0mim ............ . Aff .‘)) im^ . ^ .jpr-•'V V' '*.•<«!• % •«►>•A>ipw 4x- 'yy- f -■<. J r% ■■.• O' ^ ;.J, X*','. P.i.,^. .4^V;, '.:.v: ., iA;W ' iFj» ■, , .1' T » 'I*. •I ■■••*. -■•■•i' ^ ^ „ _.. ,^„, _ '“• >10 -tofWrt •V'Jsr^*-: •IpipSWs* -r’ ; •,:-fc..r-- ■ft * It S^Sif ^ ui "?s- '•. .VT .T ik iriK '’^ ■' ' ■ .r: \ik Al- .^:- -■:.5'?fe;. ■V ■«?# ^ -p'- « site '■ -'felteV- n-i. .> ■1»- ‘ •> «'* w':|ffi«-.. c^^/lLAKE MINNEIONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Jun* 30. 1992 To: Wator Structuras Coaaittaa Prom: Rachel Thibault Subj: north Shore Drive Marina alip designation At the Januarjr Hater Structures committee meeting North Shore Drive Marina’s license was discussed in regarHt to non- cosplianee Mith a stipulation on their 1991 license that transient and service slips be designated. As a result of this meeting, the marina operators. Deborah and Mark Breneman met 2/13/92 with Board members Doug Babcock and Bert Poster, and the administrative technician at the LMCO office. The history of North Shore Drive Marina's license was reviewed from 1984 to present: In 1984, a settlement was reached to rebuild the docks within 200 feet, and a proposed site plan for 76 atorage, 6 service, 6 transient slips and 20 racks was approved by the Board 2/22/84, subject to an as-built survey. In April 1987 an as-built survey, submitted 11/86, was approved for docks accommodating 81 storage. 6 transient, 6 service and 20 racks, however the location of transient and service slips was not designated. In 1988 the Board amended the license to allow adding 52 rack storage, for a total of 72 rack storage spaces. In 1989 and 1990, the renewal application indicated 89 storage slips, plus 8 lagoon slips not designated as to use, and 72 rack storage. In 1991, when the renewal application again was for 85 storage and 8 lagoon slips, and 72 rack, the applicant was asked to designate the 6 service and 4 transient. At the 2/13/92 meeting, a suggestion was made, subject to LMCD Beard approval, that the applicant consider designating the 8 slips in the lagoon transient to accownodate the *■ suatamera. and the service slips would be designated as needed among the remaining 85 storage slips. The applicant asked for time to consider this proposal. ¥ • -V .. ^ A sj 1 i ji :'^i: V \* cit r T^vP"r-;-"^- fci ‘- V'#P- urn-i..' W010IpvWU' ■ gS^; (WiiX: .VWc!« V ..=>■ KtLfc' SIS#^ |»3#fww 4 "0M ■■w. « V %X ' ■. 'V£>J ■)ri--i'i: ■■■:•■ ’Sls%iX x:,::A' mm-r :•■ iSiCIpllt tf«t<ir Structures Committee, 6/30/92, Page 2 At a second meeting 2/26/92, with Babcock and Thibault, the Brenemens agreed that this would be acceptable proposal. Newever, they had heard from their insurance company that transient slips would cost double what staging slips would eest to insure, due to the lack of control over transient euatemera. With advice from LMCD attorney, staff advised Deb Breneman that the transient designation was for LMCD code regulation ptirpoaea indicating no overnight storage, and that they could decide whether the slips were used for the general public or not. Staff recommends that North Shore Drive Marina be licensed to maintain the 8 lagoon slips as staging area/transient slips with the remaining service slips to be located as needed among the 85 storage slips. The lagoon slips 81*8 would be for use by their rack customers or other transient customers as needed, with no overnight storage allowed. V.-3 111 1 .4 ■'1^ C1- II ’1-Mii H■i i '* ’i>1 » '? ib SHOtE ORlVe MARZNA i { / tiiilifeioiii that th« c«ac sld« tIUi Min 4ock b« signed i|lilcnggs<il loading and liliiai only.'*.5:26:90 L*' -vi • *•Otroittec 6oac parking ac the i»iMioiit slips b otrosawnc Piort Ordsr ^lt-§4 p::, . W.- : iv ’i gp ' IBs iiss fips,: ;?iW ^ iii«r tel mm ' WfiSWf it -V .. ,f:% is- IWEr %:• '■: ., A" ■ «^av<SNMT. A ; j:aSr V ........ RCCCIVEO HOV 2 5 1986 yijdjQ.m t 1 MltR -99k - n*. ■ri»***«T fff9 - f»> Tts /MO- «».?!-a. /M/- Mp,7*A./«.S /ffX - 93\^f "* * —fr.; -5..-...-..-, m Iw fe- ^ f. fe 1^I iraiia .V^'. -..d ... g»': f k:- ,&■, K*'isfev -,t^ w- - ■ HINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JUNE 15, 1992 isiaapi^ChAir K<*M*y CAllcd tht mAAtlna to ordor at 7:00 p.m. (•1) 91743 ALBERT HANSER, IMS FOX STREET -PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - PUBLIC HEARING 7:00 - 7:23 P.M. Tha AffIdav11 of Pub I 1 cat Ion and Cart IfI cata of Mailing ware notad. Maridith Howall and Mark Qronbarg wara present. MWlii Howall notad tha preferred entrance for the existing residence Is tSa waatarn drive. Cfiair Xalley asked about the non-conforming structures. Mabusth stated the non-conformlng structures would be subject to all partinant standards. Chair Xalley thought the tennis court was to be removed. Row I at ta rswswbared previous conversations snd Indicated tha tennis oouft couldn’t be structurally rapalrad. Chair Kelley asK^ ’ about the guest house on Lot 1. ayatam Is unknown but appears to be within 78 of Tanagar Lake and Staff Is raauastinf new septic testing. Bronbarg reported that there Is adequate ares for alternate sites for both tha guest house and the main house. 4;::’ 1 « i ■ .r- '’M iWS RiW ,vh:;v' ife ijiiSif- fei# iiSft-^ lii ffiit PP^ m.-- ta'S-sP'^ C :■■•-■• i ■ifr -^ ,- :|l^, * : iir ^:V V, K^'' J|Sp*' * ’ MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JUNE 15. 1992 ZONING FILE 91743 - CONT. Mabutth addtd that final approval Is conditionad upon receipt of a conditional use permit application for the guest house. Chair Kalley asked about the detached garage within the wetland •etback area. Qronberg noted there is a culvert under the railroad that has made the area artificially high. The culvert was partially unplugged this spring which did drain the area somewhat. He added there may be soaie Impact as to where the actual wetland line is determined. Chair Kelley state>i cnat the detached garage Is also in tne front yard. Mabuath stated that technically this is a lakeshore lot, so a detached, accessory structure is allowed In the street yard. Chair Kelley felt that the structures on the property should meet the code or be elIminated. Howell stated she was confused as to the actual water line for the wetland. She felt that 'r the culvert were cleared out, the water IIne would change. ieliows stated that the tennis court has been known to have ducks •wiMKing on It on occasion. flowlette said that during the last 19 years, the tent's court has been under water periodically. Oronberg added that the culvert connects to the wet*ends adjacent to Lake Minnetonka at 929.4* elevation. Last fall the elevation of the wetland was 932.3*, almost 3* higher. He felt there is a large Impact if the culvert is functioning properly. Ml lows asked the how the elevation of the wetland is determined. Nabusth stated the culvert located by City staff last spring Is below the 929.4* elevation. She added there laay be another culvert at a higher elevation has not been located yet. She noted the other culvert controlling elevation for the Browns Bay wetlands Is 933*, the elevation of the drainage ditch on the north side of the ralfroad track that would carry overflow drainage to Tanager Lake. Qronberg noted that after the culvert was partially unplugged, the water cmm down a half foot. Ml lows asked the elevation of the tennis court 'MV: m '.■■5:- f •:4-^ mr■lfe. hm-^. ■ • ?iiP"i^m 4u Ilfm ill L,f';_^ ;.:' - r ■. .;* ■ MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JUNE 15. 1992 ZONING FILE #1743 - CONT. Qronbtrg said that elevation Is similar to the culvert. HoMeil added that the tennis court has been In a state of disrepair because of the blocked culvert. She noted that the court needs to be resurfaced, but basically is In good condition. Current owners and future owners have significant Interest in the tennis court. Peterson asked if the owners have a use for the detached garage. HoweM stated it is used for lawn equipment and is in reasonably good shape. Mabusth stated that during a conversation with Jack Taylor, the appilcant*s attorney, she explained the allowed maintenance to non- conforming structures. She felt that resurfacing was normal maintenance Beliowe suggested that in exchange for the drive to he allowed to remain too close to the wetland, the non-conforming structures should be removed. It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Cohen, to recommend approval for Application #1743 for Albert Hanser, 1685 Fox Street, for preliminary subdivision approval, subject to conditions of staff recommendatI on #1 through S7, with the exception *hat #6 allow the gueat house only to remain under a conditional use permit, and the detached garage and tennis court be removed. Ayes 4, nays 1. Rowlette voted nay. (#2) #173B ONONO AREA SPORTS FACILITY, INC. 2B78 SIXTH AVENUC NORTH - •KETCH PLAN RKVtEV FOR PROPOSED SUBDIVISION PEIWIT PUBLIC HEARING B:23 - B:27 P.M. i CONDITIONAL USE The Affidavit of Pubi icat Ion and Cert i f icate of Mai I Ing were noted. Nabusth explained that this is a sketch plan allowing the applicant to gain early input from the City. The proposed use le an Ice hockey arena and outdoor rink at the northeast section of the School's property. The School has already purchased the two eastern parcels and Is In the process of purchasing an additional parcel this year and the final parcel In IBBS. Once the purchase is cwsplete by the School District, the City has agreed to vacate the roed outiot and all easeisents that were shown. She asked how the current application would impact the current arrengements with L'i:' 1.. •>. ‘ I1 -i. , l.r'i :'r\---!, life p'. W‘^^>. sife'.^1' i?i:. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JUNE 15, 1992 th« City. ZONING FILE §1738 - CONT. Msbusth continued, the only designated wetland on the property Is l8 the southeast corner. She displayed the master plan of the School District for this property. Drainage easements wl I I be taken over the ravine. The application will be reviewed for conditional use permit approval under the code which allows specific uses such as clubs, country clubs, private 'mming pools. The City Is asked to consider If the Ice arena, a^ a non-profit, privately owned entirely can be allowed under this section of the code. •el lows said, "If the School District, as many school districts do. ware proposing constructing an Ice arena, I can not Imagine we would deny It as an Inappropriate use. I would make the case rather strongly that this is absolutely a compatible use to the school. Is in fact going to be used by the school. Is a facility that many schools build on their own, Its a facility that many communities more civic minded than Orono happens to be, often construct as part of their civic facilities. I can’t think of a reason why it would be considered an I nappropr I ate use.'* Cohen agreed and asked if the ice arena were not realized, what could the property be used for. He pointed out that the City of Minnetonka has its Ice arena next to City Hall. Rowlette said, "there is no place else In the City that 1 would want to sea It. It Is the most appropriste place to be." Nabusth Introduced Dai Erickson, architect for the Ice Hockey Association. Chair Kallay asked If the School Board had asked the Association to discuss this Issue with each city within the school district. Sob Ns I verson, President of Orono Sports Fad l i ty Assoclat ion, said that was a condition set forth by the School District. He stated he had discussed this with each city within the district. He noted most of the comments were quest I )ns which could not be answered at that time. Soetten said that no one has approached the Orono Council. Ed Cohen left the meeting at B:3S p.m. I ■i-r ■% ll:& .t. m ■; 'I'* f;-- P: s lii" mm ii MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JUNE 15, 1992 ZONING FILE t1738 - CONT. Erickson sxplslned that two years ago they started reviewing the site. He noted the facility is not strictly for hockey and can be used for other Ice activities as well as dry floor activities. He stated the School Board noteo their desire to have the Ice arena located In the northeast corner of the property. The proposed »>te allows the most ap,'- opriate means of access to the County rrad for sighting and safety purposes. He noted a concern of the School District Is that ;.iere not be a roadway through any of the playfleids. He added access would be a divided driveway with considerable stacking space. They are not proposing improvements to County Road 6. 250 parking spaces have been provided with the potential of an additional 80 spaces to the west to be used jointly wi th balI field users. John Lein, 2700 Sl.th Avenue North, asked about the hetght of the building, the cost and the speed limits on both County Poad 8 and Old Crystal Bay Road. Carol Carrol I , 2600 Sixth Avenue North, noted that all rer.dent.t with the exception of one, between Old CrysiAl Bay and Willow Drive along County Road 6 were present. She said !.he opposed the sports complex for the following reasons: the area is zoned rural residential, for single family uses; the construction of a durable, economic shell la not compatible with surrounding homes; the value of adjolnlng propertles will be diminished; the appIicant Is a non profit organ I zat I on, and la not repulred to pay taxes; If the facility is built, the property owners expect a reduction In property values; the hours of operation are Incompatible with the area; and traffic moves very fast on County Road 6. Lein said he has resided in his home for 9 years and stated he la not opposed to the ice arena, but felt that the facility does not meet the zoning requirements of the area. Me felt there were less obtrusive uses for the properties. Me felt that the facility would destroy the nature of the living environment and did not feel It was compatible with the area. Me stated berming and plantings are not a practical solution. Me noted that staff stated in the memo that this site was chosen because It is economical and suitable for the organi zat Ion. Me noted as they have pictured development around them, they hoped for attractive homes, not parking lots, lights, and higher speeds. Lonnie Schwarz, H2S Willow Drive North, stated she moved from Fridley 2 years ago. She agreed with the need for such a facility but felt there was a more suitable area for It. She said the wanted to preserve the natural environment. 6 . .. . . mk;: ■■ f,’ MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JUNE 15, 1992 ZONING FILE §1738 - CONT. Mrs. Erickson, 2500 Sixth Avenus North, said she Is not opposed to tha facility, but merely to the site. Connie Lein stated she Is not opposed to the facility being located Mithin the vicinity of the school. She noted they purchased their home because of Orono’s strict zoning requirements. She hoped the Planning Commission would vote to preserve the rural nature of the area Tom Carroll said he thought the Idea of placing the arena next to City Hail is a great idea. Erickson noted that the parking lot probably would not be filled to capacity ail the time. He stated they had reviewed other sites, but the School District expressed their desire to locate the facility at this site. He said that parcels along Highway 12 were too expensive. Nell Lawson, Assistant SuperIntendent of the Orono School District, explained that the land was purchased for expansion of the school. The master plan indicated an excess of 12 acres to the north. The Hockey Associat ion approached the School District with the proposal and the School Board requested the Hockey Association to approach surrounding communities with the proposal. The Board decided to consider an option for the group, but will in no way make any arrangements that will detract from the primary use for the property. Bellows asked the size of the proposed elementary s« )Ool. Lawson stated approximately 700 to 800 students. Rowtette asked If there would be sufficient land at the northeast corner. Erickson stated the parcel is bisected by the ravine and there would be additional costs involved with construct Ion. Bellows asked if the School District would consider a joint use of the fire lane around the proposed elementary school to allow access to the arena Lawson explained that they do not want children to cross a road to get to the play area. 8 i, fv’-'-'- ■•>■ i4|ks» v • ;, \r, ■ < V" : ■ vfP- ■^-'!lf^.r=.'- -■ m:-m:=>:-r r-'*^A;.. . ;iiS'' ^ ;> ■^-■-i #■ ^'Mh:.ffef i|f., Q fc Mm ■'■: ll .tVM: ■ - "'S' *r« L.,:JS.-IIS' V'M 'WB-e :':o::y:-: ' M ' W^MP s.'^^wr- NINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COHMISSION MEETINGHELD JUNE 15, 1992 ZONING FILE i1738 - CONT. Linda HcGInty, Prttident of the Orono Hockey Association, asked If it Mould be appropriate to discuss the possibility of using a more southern parcel. She noted that area would provide Joint parking Mith the school. Mabuath stated the City owns that parcel and is the location of the only mature trees on the City property. Peterson asked why they would not wait for a decision Highway 12 corridor, as that may Impact their decision. the Rowlette agreed that it would be appropr I ate to locate the facility near the school, and agreed with the danger of additional traffic on County Road 6. Peterson aald that County Road 6 currently is a traffic nightmare, but traffic should lessen with the completion of 394. Chair Kelley agreed that the City could use a facility such as this, but felt that access onto County Road 6 is too dangerous. He felt this is a major project and should be treated as such. He suggeated a Joint meeting with the Council to further discuss the Issue. Rowlette asked how this building compares in size with the Public Works building being constructed. Mabusth noted they are very similar in size. Goetten added that If Long Lake succeeds with acres of Orono within its boundaries, this affected. incorporating 400 parcel would be •el lows asked if there were time restraints. Halverson said they have been presented with an option to purchase. McGInty noted that the Committee is doing an admirable Job. She urged the Commission to consider th«^ proposal with intensity. Callahin said the Council would set a Joint meeting date at the neat Council meeting. :n--- gpt i:: i 't.,: '.•: : J:.- ;- K-ff -- •■W-- MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGHELD JUNE 15, 1992 ZOMIMQ FILE 91738 - CONT. LiPd# McGinty, President of the Orono Hockey Association, asked If It liould be appropriate to discuss the possibility of using a more southern parcel. She noted that area would provide Joint parking ulth the school. MoOusth stated the City owns that parcel and is the location of the only mature trees on the City property. Peterson asked why they would not wait for a decision on the Highway 12 corridor, as that may impact their decision. Rowlette agreed that it would be appropriate to locate the facility near the school, and agreed with the danger of additional traffic on County Road 6. Peterson said that County Road 0 currently is a traffic nightmare, but traffic should lessen with the completion of 394. Chair Kelley agreed that the City could use a facility such as this, but felt that access onto County Road 6 is too dangerous. Mo felt this is a major project and should be treated as such. He suggested a Joint meeting with the Council to further discuss the Issue. Rowlette asked how this building compares in size with the Public Morks building being constructed. ftabusth noted they are very similar in size. Moetten added that It Long Lake succeeds with acres of Orono within its boundaries, this affected. incorporat i ng 400 parcel would be bellows asked if there were time restraints Nel.'ereon said they have been presented with an option to purchase. Mebinty noted that the Coassittee is doing an admirable Job. She urged the Coaaiisalon to consider the proposal with intensity. Cellehin said the Council would set a Joint meeting date at the iMiat Connell meeting. .0 ” -- '-n-i 1 'r - ':i 0im Ux ri. kijgfe - -f ^, ■ p!'>.ite t!s?S f ‘ • riffp 'tefSr 1 V*:.[_;>•-■ :V^!^. '^I, i|. "■-S p iWs :• -mk- MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETIN^i HELD JUNE 16, 1992 (•3) 91739 ALBIN J. NELSON. 500 OXFORD RO - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING 7:25 - 7:27 P.M. Tht Affidavit of Pub 11 cat I on and Cert IfI cate of Mailing were noted. Albln Nelson was present. Mabuath explained that th j application involves the removal of existing retaining walls and placement of fill. She noted he plans to Install slopes at 2.5:1. It is recommended that grass not be uaad as ground cover. The City Engineer has asked that granular material be placed to the rear of the 4* high retaining wall that grading be done to encourage drainage to the side of retaining walI. and the Nelson asked that he have the option of constructing the wall of material other than modular block. out It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Peterson, to recommend approval of Application 91739 for Albln J. Nelson, 500 Oxford Road, for a conditional use permit to allow the construct ion of retaining walIs and grading, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Engineer, with the exception that the applicant be allowed to construct the walls from material of his choice. Ayes 5, nays 0. (•4) 91740 STEVEN M. HARRIS. 3S80 WATERTOWN ROAD - REimAt CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - 9:30 - 9:33 P.N. The Affidavit of Pub I I cat Ion and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Steven Harris was present for this application. Nabusth explained that this is a renewal of a conditional use permit to allow excavation of a retention pond. There are many poel 11ve aspects related to the proposed retent ion pond. There wl I 1 be a fence around the pond to keep the horses from destroying or defeating the purpose of the pond. It was aioved by Bellows, seconded by Chair Kelley, to recommend approval of Application 91740 for Steven Harris of 3850 Watertown Road, approving a conditional use permit to allow the installation of a retention pond. Ayes 4, nays 0. r:^iif“fe'' ;■ i4W^ /V fV kV. m ''0^ iiif^ mm ' ,■;■•• C-: ■fW‘‘mr -ij. liter'- m i‘. ii d'4:; Sfl#. fe s MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGHELD JUNE 15. 1992 (tS) #1741 RODNEY J. AND 8HAN0N K. BATZLAFF. 1119 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING 7:30 - 7:32 P.M. Th« Affidavit of PubI Icatlon and Cart I f Icata of Mai I Ing wara notad. Mr. and Mra. Batzlaff Mara prasant. Nabuath axplalnad that tha applicants saak approval of a varlanca to •!low a datachad atructura to ba placed In front of tha front Mfi# of tha principal structura, and a variances to tha side and atraat setback standards. Chair Kaltay aakad about tha shad property line. In tha rear which Is over tha Mabuath stated that tha lot does not have a coverage problem. Mr. Batzlaff said that tha shad would have to ba Jacked up and put on skids to move. •allows said she did not have a problem with tha shed If It ware to ba Moved onto tha property. It was moved by Bailowsi seconded by Chair Kelley, to recommend approval of Application #1741 for Rodney and Shanon Batzlaff of 1119 Brown Road South, for a variance to construct a detached garafe, aubjact to shed being relocated within tha property boundaries. Ayes 9, nays 0. Chair Kelley stated tha shad would need to ba moved 12’ inward to meet reoulred setbacks. (••) 01742 JAMn AND AMY LAINQ, BOO OMONO OMCNAflD ROAO * VAMtANCE - PUBLIC NEARING 7:33 - 7:38 P.M. The Affidavit of PubI Icatlon and Cart I f I cate of Mai l ing ware noted. James Laing was prasant for this application. 9 ■;<4 '• Si .1 i "■'I '-si Vifo' !h;, 3fV' b '7 pir- sm^- p:7 W.-!?9 m Ntii-m: i# y-^\< ■5 am£ W-. fp' - ■■ ':lp- 'Imm. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JUNE 15. 1992 ZONING FILE 91742 - CONT. Mabutth •xplaintd that the applicant owns six lots, which have btan comb I nad Into two parcals on althar si da of a 12’ public right- of-way. Sha notad tha applicant proposas tha ramoval of an axlatlng garaga and shad to Install a garage and family room addition to tha east side of tha rasidanca, 19.1’ from Dickenson Straat and 10*6** from tha allay. Sha added they propose an addition to tha south side of tha structure at 43’ from Orono Orchard Road, whara tha existing structure Is 48* from that road. The proposed additions would require variances to tha front street line, side street setback line, and from the allay. Sha notad that during a similar review It was determined that a normal fear yard setback would be required from the alley. Qoattan stated that the roadway Is very dangerous to use as parking and this Is an improvement to the property. Mabusth added that a condition of approval be the combination of all six lots either as a legal combination or special lot coa^lnation. It was moved by Row latte, seconded by Cohen, to recommend approval of Application 91742 for James and Amy Laing, 500 Orono Orchard Road, for variances to construct sddltlons to the residence, with tha condition that all six lots be combined. Ayes 5, nays 0. (97) 91744 DONALD HELQAOER, 9tM SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - VANIANCE - PUSLIC HEARING 7:40 - 7:50 P.M. Tha Affidavit of PubI Icatlon and Certificate of Mai I Ing were noted. Don Helgagar was present for this application. Mabusth explained that this Is an application for a variance to conatruct a 4* high fence to be located less that 150’ from a natural anvironmental lake. The structure wlI I be located In line with tha septic system. Hal gager added that tha area near the lake to be fenced off Is virtually unusable. Chair Kelley asked about a survey. Mabusth notad that the septic system at the time of the Installation had to be certified and at that time had to meat the 75* aatback from the lake. Staff confirmed the fence would not encroach any closer. 4 -V fv\‘vB|is##%;'. ”PS'"'"'""■,i ' f- •>'•VV :VV,-"W •'I ^ fesW >'V:y'.., L'V-.fV' sfe:4/'*' •■■ ip i : ip S-'*S,%,,2>w Is 14/,..-. ■• an* ■ Tp. ■■V 'Wf'- :fM ,' i:‘f': '4mm-' m'^: .Ife:'' mrnm■ :.\. ■ *t'* ■\ Iri's. T... rn/m. mMm MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JUNE 15. 1992 ZONING FILE #1744 - CONT. Htlgagar statad that the septic system was Installed 3 years ago. Bellows asked what the Installation of the septic system was based upon. Mabueth said it was based upon confirmation of a surveyor staking the setback line at site. She added that the applicant has not been asked to provide a survey because of the expense and the reason for Installation Is for safety of young children. Nalgager noted the property was surveyed prior to the Installation Of the septic system. At that time the 75’ setback line was staked to Indicate where the system had to be Installed. Mabusth stated that a drawing of the property at the time of the staking was not completed. She added she and Weckman made a recent Inspection of the site to confirm the proposed fence would not liipact existing septic. It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Rowlette, to recoawiend approval of Application #1744 for Donald Helgager at 3265 Sixth Avenue North, for a variance to construct a fence. Ayes 2. nays 3. Chair Kelley. Cohen and Bellows voted nay. Motion failed. It was aioved by Cohen, seconded by Bellows, to recommend denial of Application #1744 for Donald Helgager at 3265 Sixth Avenue North, due to the lack a survey. Ayes 3. nays 2. Peterson and Rowlette voted nay. Chair Kelley asked the applicant if he wished the application to be denied and proceed onto Council for review. Helgager said he would like to proceed. Cohen withdrew his aiotlon. It was Mved by Cohen, eeconded by Bellows, to table Application 61744 for Donald Helgager, 3266 Sixth Avenue North. Ayes 3, nays 2. Rowlette and Peterson voted nay. ;-v:; pp a1-^, i fee/' •'ap#- ^' m&-P£>'-: ,.!.'«-i feli MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JUNE 15, 1992 (••) SI745 DAVID R. CARLSON, 020 BIQ ISLAND - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING - 7:50 - 8:12 P.M. Vv Tut AffIdavlt of Pub 11 cat Ion and Cart I fI cat# of Mailing wara notad. Davitf Carlson was wars praxant. MaBusth sxpisinsd that a building Inspactlon confirmsd that tho cabin is eonstructad on plar footings 16“ daap, 7.5' on cantar, and do not siast existing standards. Tha applicant has submittad an asiandad plan which maintains hardcovar at the axisting amount. A aatback varianca for th 0-75' araa would naed to ba approved. Chair Kail ay asksd about tha condition of tha cabin. m .•.ucnCf-1 « Mabuath raportad that it Is not as bad as adjacent structures. Tha cabin was built in 1963. Tha applicant proposes to replace tha roof, a'ding and windows. She explained that tha applicant has withdrawn his request for a holding tank and has agreed to remove ’"‘III The structure Is under 000 s.f. In araa, and per Code, iNNild be allowed an outhouse if the outhouse is able to meat ail pertinent standards. Cnair Kelley said that if the building ware being proposed in i^s Pfafadflt location today. It would ba denied. He asked if tiia .fPWfidatlon can support the proposed improvements. Mabyath stated that the Inspector confirmed that tha foundation is adequate to support the existing structure, but would not comment on any future upgrades to tha structure. Bellows suggested they require certification of tha foundation by a atructural engineer. SS*4fCarlson requested that the Planning Commission recommend approval '"of the application with the condition that It be Inspected by a structural engineer so tha project will not be delayed. ' ■ Rateraofi asked if Carlson proposed moving the building if the piers are found to be inadequate. pW' Carlson reminded him that this Is on an island, and It would be very difficult to make a vertical move. V,: Mabusth noted the structure could be located further back on the property, but would still require Interior lot line setbacks, varIance. n ■p (a t r • f. V ^li#S?-isiW'.f ■i®:#ti%>*!:-r^':r;' ftm W ■ ■■ iiiv: ':>^m0.i,, -- . ■ r.'*'i-fj. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JUNE 15, 1992 ZONING FILE §1745 - CONT. B«Mows said she would be more amenable to such a request. Chair Kelley said that because of building, he would not be witling approval to the Council. the structural needs of the to make a recommendation of Rowlette noted that the repairs being proposed appear to exceed 50% of the valuation. It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Rowlette, to recoftwnend denial of Application #1745 for David Carlson, 620 Big Island, for variances, based on the fact that the proposed alterations exceed the allowed 50% limit and there Is available land to allow placement of a structure requiring less of a variance. Ayes 5, nays 0. Mabusth Informed Carlson that his application would now go to the Council with a recommendation of denial from the Planning Commission. She asked If he would rather have the application tabled to allow him time to revise his plan. Carlson asked that the application be tabled. It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Rowlette, to withdraw the previous motion. Ayes 8, nays 0. It waa moved by Bellows, seconded by Rowlette to table Application •lt4B for David Carlson of 620 Big Island, to allow the applicant time to amend his proposal. Ayes 5, nays 0. (•9) CHARLES CUOO COMPANY, StID SUQARNOOO DRIVE - RfOUBST TO RtVISi DRIVEWAY ALIGNMENT Mr. Bonner was present. Nabueth explained that standards were developed at the conception of Sugar Wooda. This is the Cudd Company's first time building In Bygar Woods. The lot In question is the southern lot on the loop road with the retaining wall. There is a large bais wood on the property. Portions of the drive exceed the maximiM allowed width of 2D' within the 50’ setback area. The building permit was Issued with the understanding that those standards would be met. The house has been located as far to the rear as possib'e as there Is a sheer drop behind it. &i "Ii<1 A >■! i-'-’J ' ‘ ‘ !---------- --------------. x;all;* li# ii^;. If! i: Ip! 5S. i; |tp' -m ;iP-5 ■K'Mk -. ■ ■ ^ JM '■ilf' s -V * mM. ■;:lr 0 ■vX'P-'.:f |tp 'W'- MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JUNE 15, 1992 2110 8UGARW00D DRIVE - DRIVEWAY REALIGNMENT - CONT. Bonn«r said thara is actually a 13’ drop from tha street to the raar of tha *ot and that is tha primary reason for the original ratalning wall. Ha said they have chosan to antar the proparty at tha only spot which Is ralatlvely tha same grade as tha straat. Nabusth notad tha Mr. Bonnar had recalvad a copy of tha architectural contracts whan ha purchased tha property from Mr. Rabars. Paterson asked about interfering with the existing utilities. Bonnar said tha drive is right on grade, and tha utility companies have Indicated they do not have a problem with tha location. Cudd has agreed to relocate tha stop box If they wish. It was moved by Chair Kelley, seconded by Row latte, to recommend approval of tha request to revise the driveway alignment for Charles Cudd Company, 2110 Sugarwood Drive. Ayes 2, nays 2. Paterson voted nay because he felt tha building had no intent to construct the driveway as originally proposed. Bellows voted nay also. Nabuath said she thought the straight alignment through the ratalning wail was very attractive, but would destroy the bass wood. The house was located at the only position given the topography of the property. Bonner said they could use the straight alignment, but It appears that they would be asked to meet the letter of the law, not the apirlt of it. Bellows said she would change her vote If given assurance that this would not happen after-the-fact again. Bonnar suggested that the covenants be ch^^nged to give builders more flaxibl11ty. Bellows explained that the intent of the covenants was to make tha builder gain approval prior to construct ion. Chair Kelley said Bonner should have read through the covenants prior to beginning construct ion. (BIO) RBPOflT BY PLANNING COiMlBBION REPRESENTATIVE Thera was no report. 4 K.-.; :; --V • j,,' " 7 '-- , ,.gEKV'r'-JfA-w '\-. '• ■ 'v«t V. f-!V.: -. If Si ' £4.”?-'J.^. IP^»i'- fK •p IA'*f'4: •■ V^' :'IteF' -M'km i;#: ,:l^ *^>iy■ :|V :.a iy- ' 'M'- ■ mm -mm. ^ IteK' >-:m^- PB. HINUTE8 OF THE ORONO PLANNING COHNISSION MEETING HELD JUNE 15, 1992 (ill) REPORT BY THE LAKE USE COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVE ChKi r K#ll#y reported the Committee Is working on marina licensing and styrofoam docks. (•12) REPORT BY THE FACILITIES COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVE Chair Kelley said there has not been a meeting for several weeks. Rowlette said things seem to have stopped on site. Mabusth explained that they can not proceed with the footings for the Police Department because both the State Corrections Department and the Building Division were required to review the plan and have required amendments or changes. Bellows asked that these Issues be reported to the Committee members as they arise. Mabusth advised that the City Administrator Is advised on a dally basis of the status of the property by the Building staff. She •tated that the footing contractor made some errc's and a structural engineer had to be called to the site to review the footings. Later there were also major problems found with the Installation of the masonry block walls. She Indicated that the Job superintendent Is doing an excellent Job as well as the Orono Inspectors. Chair Kelley asked If there is a Council person Informed of such pfObIema. Callahan noted both he and Jabbour are the liaisons for the City Facilities Committee. (•la) OTNBR ISSUES There were no other Issues. (•14) APPROVAL OF MJNUTE8 It was moved by Rowtette, seconded by Peterson, to approve the minutes of the May ia, 1992 Planning Commission meeting. Ayes 4. nays 0. (•IS) WPRESEMTATIVE TO THE JULY 13, 1992 COUNCIL MEETINQ Rewlette volunteered to attend the July 13, 1992 meeting. l-.n c,-..’.-t'/iLi*.!!.'5 ..A 1 i •V ■^ i -> • , ^ NINUTE8 OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JUNE 16, 1992 : i- W.'' ■ hi ^ AOJOUrotICNTCMIr K«ll«y adjourned tha rtgular Planning Commission masting at 9:97 p.m. f ii , - ' '-Uti ,- iJ- i' M- 4® A; ^"r. .■« %::k' i- ^•,-i # i'2 ■V - • '>i-. l-}/f. ■'■ ■.? .I..V. ■' ■ ' :?■ . P4! ■r' Charlie Kaiiay, Chair Parson 16 ■■■ .tS-; ■fm •i:^ 7^ •771 vV ^ v^^'/ l^iow g^^pmmmut |i, Tin»^fe.;, fe:.' »gmWm:. %V ' t '--^ ,sl*“splifc :=^'^ -■^'' LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT900 EAST WAYZATA BOULEVARD. SUITE 160 • \iVAVZATA. MINNESOTA 55391 • TELEHONE 612'473-7033 EUGENE n. STROMMCN. EXECUTIVE OtRECTOA • i - /—tr YOU AND YOUR GUEST ARE INVITED vJ ♦J TO PARTICIPATE IN THE rjUC 2 PUBLIC OFFICIALS LAKE TOUR AND LUNCHEON SATURDAY, AUGUST 1,1992 on LAKE MINNETONKA hosted by the LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION OIST.tICT >VI Aboard at 11:00 AM Return to Port at 2:00 PM at the LAFAYETTE CLUB DOCK County Road 15, Kiinnetonka Beach (please observr designated parking areas) Plene RSVP by Friday, July 24 Including guest's name, 473-7 » •• y 'J _.Vf . :h'; f/ ••iC 1 T •- A J ■ -v J ' v-Tv^ 4’ •s ’ •-•l:;.-*A^' •* !.;■ ■ ■ H- M ''.V.1' ."• ill iKjfV 40^’^" lit'Is? f'#' I vii?mw .' ""ir,.; :..Vf 0^- '. 'i'V JUL k 1952 Rpnald Moorse Adar.-Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN assodotlpn of melropo Iran munictpa ities 55323-0066 Juna 29, 1992 Osar Ronald, Citisa hava raachad a critical jjncture at the Legislature. State otriclals saan to believe that cities^ financial resources can provide the answer to the state's continual funding problems. We want to know your view about what direction the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities should take during 1993 to help protect cities fron further legislative intrusion on our tax base. To provide you with a forun for your opinions and concerns on this and other issues, we are planning our seventh annual Outreach Breakfast for you and other city officials in your area. >■ The breakfast is scheduled for July 21 at 7:30 a.ra. in tie Wellington Room of the Radisson-Ninnetonka, Ridgedale Drive. It is located on the SB comer of Interstate 394 (Highway 12)/Ridgedale Drive exit. Turn south on Ridgedale Drive and go about one long block to the hotel. Please R.S.V.P. to Carol or Nicole by noon, July 17. The AHM would like your input on the following concerns: * itotropolitan issues such as stona water management, water supply and general Metropolitan Council authority; * Legislative natters such as LGA and HACA distribution, the Local Cknferraaent Trust Fund, transportation and transit concerns, local options for city revenues and regional sewer financing; * Seeking connitnents from legislative candidates regarding their yiewe toward city issues. ♦ Tte Metropolitan Governance Task Force's preliminary report on the Metr«^politan Council and the Task Force's view of the Council's role in the region. This is not a formal gathering and we hope for lots of discussion from you, because your opinions, concerns and advice will help shape AIBf's policies and priorities for the 1993 session. I •V. m-w >63 at iMiJ. minwes oia 55i0i (612) 227-4006 -J mm ^*■mmk.'ris »:‘5»'s s::,« ~.2J &“.5“ir:‘tS“ ;s«-^rt ••rvic«« that we ehould provide, or improvements to curre.S . _ fC'*"'currentMrvlces that you can suggest?4''. offiea •incaraly # i(aran Anderson, AMM President mnnatofika Council Barbara Peterson AMM Board member Orono Mayor Tom' Spies AMM Board member Bloomington Council IR-^-V •% FT-i: '.^i>■ ir W'm>. m- ^r: m m- WMi': ’- I ii <-iiilMti I1i 1 i '■ ■•R i m-. m my? m r . i* i*f f|®t's-7||a flip" if- .' .,• 'Vi- :l^i'^;v *;«r^Northern States Power Company Edina Araa July 6, 1992 5309 Wtsi 70th Street Edina. Minnesota 55435-3284 Tetephone (612) 829-4500 D«ar N8P Customar: Kuliabla alactric servica is crucial to tha acononic %rall-baing of your conninity* HSP*s aandata is to bring you a raliafcla supply of •Xactricity as safaly and aconomically as possible. You should knoVf tharafora, ^hat daspita solid conservation efforts fron MSP and its cuatonara in Hopkina and Minnetonka, demand for electricity la axcaading our ability to deliver it because of continued growth in your conunity. In fact, by 1993, wa sea the potential for a severe falling off of aarvica if wa are not allowed to build the new substation and transaiaaion line wa'va proposed for your araa. we are going ^|PQugh a pamitting process now with Lha City of Minnetonka on that proposal. Plaasa know that our procedures in detenu in ing need and iPUCOUBOfiding a site for the substation and transmission line ware basad on a thorough examination of alternatives, with a constant uya toward efficiency, health and safety. We believe the proposal H0U before your planning coacmission and city council is the bast ^o serve your electric needs, with the miniaum of environmental and ooat impact. In other similar proceedings around our five-state service area. found that the level of local concern often mirrors awareness of apeoifio information. The more customers know of our rationale ond the facts behind it. the Mre they realize that MSP acts xmaponsibly in actions such as this one. liecaupe the decisions your commissioners and council members make will determine your energy future, we encourage you to participate in the prooess that will affect your quality of life in the n^ term. Learn the facts for yourself by attending the first public hearing on lisp’s proposed substation and transmission line at Minnetonka City Hall. July 13. at «:30 p.m. You also may view proceedings on Channel 34 cable television. If you have further questions, contact your city council member or call MSP at 829-4504. r' I I ithold ina krea Manager iU 1 4k l : w IP m Ji'^v ■ 1^; ■ '<^- - ■ ft? •' »'•>. ,:?p' If*'' A ^ >' ■. • ^F•^ .'•’'V^^'V.-!- ■'i V ■ ^•‘■ /v .« i|»' '##■ S?» 'fc*'^ ' 4 6700 Portland Avenue • Richfield, Mipnesota 55423-2599 City Manager James 0 Prosser Mayor Marlin Kirsch Council William Bullock Michael Sandahl Ivan Ludeman Kristal Stokes auly 8, 1992 Dear City Manager/Adminlatrator: Aa the Chair of the Justice Day Dinner Task Force for the Minnesota Suburban Branch of the NAACP, I would like to invite you to ettend a "Justice Day Celebration” on Thursday, August 6 1992 free 4:00 to 10:00 p.m. at the Redisson South Hotel in Bloonington. The event will include aini>%forkshops followed by en evening of fellowship, entertalnaMnt and dinner. The goal of the Minnesota Suburban NAACP Branch is to raise the level of awareneaa of the diverse population within the 34 ooflHninitiea we service in our jurisdiction. To help us kick-off the Justice Day Celebration, we are asking the coneunities in our jurisdiction to do three things in support of our efforts: # purchase dinner/workshop tickets at 8100.00 per person (tickets will be available at event); ♦ purchase T-Shirts, "Justice Mill Be Served", as a visual daeonstration for support of eulti-cultural diversity in our 34 ooeeunities; end « purchase an ed in our Justice Pay Souvenir Journal. AS a eawiTtr of the Minniieota Suburoan KAACP Branch, Z invite your eity to participate in t*am event. Space is lieited, so X Snbourage you to register early by returning the enclosed segistretion fore to ee no later than July 16, 1992. Also, enclosed are order fores for the T-Shirts and NAACP Souvenir Journal advertieaeant. Please distribute this information to your eity officials and staff for their support. Thank you for your support and interest in this worthwhile endeavor of bringing peace to our ooseainities through our eonoerted efforts. If you have any questions, please contact Kvin Betchelder at the City of Richfield, 861-9716. •inoerely. rtin'^ Kirsch # J Mayor hielesures JUl 1 0 The Urban Hometown m»& BKil •w-fWepnons f4^2) 64Hi700 mt4749 I I j Ife.' %-’M.fe, ftffnTSTRATlQW FORM MINNESOTA SUBURBAN BRANCH NAACP JUSTICE DAY CELEBRATION ^ AUGUST 6, 1992 MINI-WORKSHOPS fh« following mini-workshop ••••ions will *^Flease tin two you ara »oat Intareatad In Addrees listed bsicw. PflfldUne for lign-up la Juiy 19. 19»» NAME TITLE ADDRESS CITY STATE TELEPHONE my WORKSHOP CHOICES ARE: SESSION I 4:00 PM SESSION II 5:00 PM 1.Police Brutality/ Hate cnees police Brutality/ Hate Crlnes 2.Multicultural, gender fair, disability aware education Multicultural, gender fair, dlsablllt, aware education 3. 4. Coenunlty reinvesteent Coanunlty reinvesteent EEOC, MN State Dept, of Huaisn Rights, fc the MN Suburban NAAC? EEOC, MN State Dept, of Human Rights, 4 the MN Suburban NAACP 1. Chief Richard Setter Minnetonka Police Dept. Chief Donald Davis Brooklyn Park Police Dept. TEAM LEADERS 2.Dr. Joan F. Kennedy Assistant Principal 8t. Paul Public School 3. TO be announced Sam Taylor, Vice- President, NAACP Tory Esbenss*), Ea Board Member, NAACP My cheek is enclosed. I will be stMidlng the Justice Day Dinner YES NO nMw MTUwi row ro; n«yor ®* klGhfleld, 4T00 Portland Av ^ue. Richfield. MN 55423 i ■;v ■ ‘i jg 1 7 . ’'■••":■ :7; ^7 :■mm imM7,...■»,,,}-? 'r« -,, .<t^'7^yf 7:,:*7il^%777:w7*a#':^ .'% ;■* ___^ liIft =i^ « c ^> m c um o ^ c 4-» •- o >» C 9t*^ O C U) c /’9t>n<yQ 23. de.1 Lot 6 lest at less..69 feet >utlteast- lecting t. More ly alongu2 > M O OP opm kiomwok 0140 OP 0«- OP O OP e VI u <M op'owe: 40 e OP u w '0*0 « w OP k w e OPCM k o £ o e OP u • o • w ■ mjs e vz r^ OP w w opi^ ____ mm _ ^ m Mk ^ a^ Ak > a S'® MM w w — •-w u — e OPw e M e w e OP OP oD •• e OP M 4-» k w «D w z £ M OP e • OP OP w M4OZOJ0OOPU Sz O VI c UP w rs. zwe** B •£ 0«0 O OP kCOW^m W V W e OPIAm «0| Mm . mZ « 4g Z W W C(M B O •— O • k • c o e ow— «dr om M e OP > « >kw C4^«^4f-»C —ocviu^a t. O €1 O 01.^^ioet.ooi*^ooi 4-iOoi««kJuaosjd U 0.£ w D. C C Of 4^ lA W « •« >««». 40tOk.--«C04-»S«^0 » M c 3.*4^s m 0>-«lA 3«.*10 « « k. e w o e ^ — k> — w o»x; O C W 0 0 C W eek04«o 5 .^=, e e k • 0 c ^ O « ewe. a (/) w c ew-**^ 0 c •» c o-^-»M 0l£ “ — • e w90 e« 01 OI.C ^ t9 90 90-^ • V 4-» lA k— O Ctt 9 «.C 01 O) WCtt 9 «.C 01 U OI0*« 0»«- Of •-£ —*D0 in —£ —XI 01 0> ^ B ♦« « wee •>w*« ko» e*^i9Moi«ee«f*»oi«« B 01 M o o e u wow « k w k o-» owwV o Of e —• fM w u — 4= ww oo o >»o ow e - o w M -■S9 W O O OP VI k k k w — O O *k k « k W • M Mm Mm V 40 tAOkk eiou eMCN — 01 01 oicw «C|| "1 « rs» oiw w c e c M o •-« <0 w <om pom e VI «o OP e o 40 o M Me OP e 90 w^ 40 w e .e 01 M4^JC OW >kWM*^ MkMOl kM%. M MOMMOOkOlkPO <M<o kWZ OPm o^ H sisiip^sis^ . 'r-.'»K VV ••,ija.;;-. lii ;;::f F£: mmmmm -'iia! '::--77',M ■ i» ,* mm > ^m'.:- ’%:% ' I M I %•. %- „-. ..::Vs:'-iSi«?«aii!'m.# V'---: # I ■ i-f > i|' .--;i'‘J 4’ " « «i t 1it «i Uiw I f|» if. ^lUtfTC,/ /%4 AL HANSER SUBDIVISION N \ - ’^'v > / \ '. ^ ^____£?» ^•iSBU'Zi.ZW .-v— il / / / // /.' ll :-?r«r ^ / / / / / // v$— — ^ ;/// .• ' » \ I ' i /j ' ■• * ‘I /'■• ' 't:i; ‘'/^ / ■'/ * /•// /V//// ; -'A/,//// —^ Ulc 1^ I au. o</: Oounc^f IhA<*A*- Cua^ LEGEND rir^ BS ALTEfUIATIVES 1 -NoBuM 2-F*J^W 2C-F*i'K-«-L 20-F<i>K+M^P SC-B-t-M-t-P 4.G-t-K-»-L 4A-Gt'J-t>P 4B-G-»-K>t-M-»-P Non; Final AHgnmam within Cofrt- dora to b« dmnninad in BS. nOURE4 REVISION DATE DESCRirriON 0 ^ar tM/rr j , .j.4 * ti ^5r-/ .............. ’ ' '■(*)9-gtf£4ft^frg •'.’ 4 f ** > K»f«-hk. rrdfv Ihji Ih*' pivpjrrd K nu' ot wnJi't mt Jimt %uprr vn«« inj itut (4 JmK rvfpKrml Cit il fji||Wifvr jnJ I jmi SufVrviit undrf Ihf Ukts .4 (hr Sail- ill MknnnulA ->ir -n.". Mifli s (4anbrrn Mipnrarti Itctn^ Numtof ir^ \ (,KC\I -Ki. I\( PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR -1 \i 1 DATE KW \0 ALBERT D. HANSER ' '2t3 IN SECTIONS 2 & 3-117-23 sMM I \t' HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA