The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06-22-1992 Council Packettl;»S'i-'-; ¥ -S* ft-. S': K •■-, > * S- T: rifm ii#’ P f? rl ■-■•T W. I- -» ;v:, ■: S:r> P ■ S •■ ^.... ■■■m. :?j MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 22. 1992 ROLL The Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Barbara Peterson, CouncI I members Gabriel Jabbour, J.DIann Goetten, Mary Butler and Edward Callahan. The following represented the City staff: City AdmInIstrator Ron Moorse, Public Works J JCtor John Gerhardson, Building & Zoning AdminIstrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, Police Chief Stephen Sullivan, City Attorney Tom Barrett, City Engineer Glenn Cook and City Recorder Teri Naab.Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:10 P.M. (•1) CONSEriT AGENDA Jabbour removed Item «5. Butler removed Item S2. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 5, nays 0. Motions for ail I terns adopted by consent agenda will be included in the minutes ir their respective numerical order. (•2) .PPROVAL or m: .t TES Butiti.'' Stated she not receive Page 3 of the minutes. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to table approval the minutes of the regular meeting of the Orono Council held on May 11. 1992 until Page 3 Is included. Ayes 5, nays 0. PUBLIC COMMENTS - Linda McQInty. representative for the Orono Hockey Association, requested the Council consider a Joint meeting to review the proposed arena site. Mayor Peterson noted that Moorse would contact the appropriate organzat I ons of the Joint meeting. Catlahan felt that a joint meetIng of all organizatIons would prove to be counter productive. Ooetten suggested that the Council and Planning Commission meet to discuss tht issue. iWsi ^iTi'-- f-- r.If- Ik. r h : i.:k ft’?'••• P MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 22, 1992 (*•3) §1679 WILLIAM MILLER, 2691 CASCO POINT ROAD - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3134 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution •3134 for AppIIcatlon #1679 for WiI I lam Ml Iler of 2691 Casco Point Road, approving variances to permit the structural repair ot a gazebo/bathhouse structure and the proposed construction of a detached garage. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#4) #1706 WILLIAM KNAPP, 4300 BAYSIDE ROAD - PRD/SUBDIVISION - REQUEST TO NAME PRIVATE ROAD It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Goetten, to approve the name Cristoforl Circle for the private road within the Cristoforl Woods plat. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#5) #1732 JOAN SWEETSER, 845 OLD LONQ LAKE ROAD - FINAL SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION #3135 Joan Sweetser was present. She explained that the assessed value for the 9 acre parcel was $94,300 for 1992, and the 7 acre parcel being divided off Is now being assessed at approximately $105,000. She also noted the Park Commission is requesting a 619’ bike trail easement along the property line. Gerhardson explained that the bike easement will be taken over the existing drainage easement, as was done with the Shadowood Plat. Jabbour felt that the Impact of having bikers going over her land is different than the Impact of a drainage easement. Mayor Peterson clarified that this may not ever be used as a bike traiI. Gerhardson concurred and explained that this area is included as part of a comprehensive bike trail system. Callahan felt the value of the easement should be reduced from the land valuation. Jabbour pointed out that the ordinance does state that they are allowed to request 8* of the fair market value, which may not be the same as the assessed valuation for the property. Callahan asked if Sweetser has a purchase agreement for the property. I¥: - ip:- I4: ?■ u£,-:V r- rs, li-' #■ W- ■-• ' ,.;> ■ f- <■ l-A: ^4:^'^ r !t'-- I?-"' n. '-:y MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 22. 1992 ZONING FILE #1732 * CONT. Sweet^er said she does and the seMIng price Is higher than the valuation set by the assessor. Mayor Peterson suggested ♦hat the buyer be made aware of the bike easement. Callahan suggested amending the resolution to reflect credit for the bike easement If the Park Comm Isslon determines that they still want the easement. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution §3135 for Application S1732 for Joan Sweetser, 845 Old Long Lake Road, subject to the resolution being amended to reflect the credit for the bike easement if It is determined by the Park Commission that they still desire the easement. Ayes 5. nays 0. (§6) §1739 ALBIN NELSON. 500 OXFORD ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Moorse explained this Is an aoplicatlon to allow replacement of a retaining wail system. Jabbour asked If the retaining wall would impact the sewer lines. Cook confirmed there would not be an impact. Callahan questioned the approval by the appileant's engineer of the materials to be used for construction. Mabusth indicated that the resolution has been drafted such that approval of the materials must be approved by the City Engineer. Butler expressed concern about the number of trees to be removed and asked if there is a plan to re-established the forestation. Mabusth said she was not aware of such a plan. 11 was moved by Qoet ten, seconded by Callahan, to table AppII cat Ion §1739 for Albln Nelson, 500 Oxford Road, until the applicant provides the City with a plan for replanting the trees to be removed during construction. Ayes 5, nays 0. V' Sf>- j. k f F bF- I JSte-" f ■I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 22, 1992 (••7) 1MO STEPHEN HARRIS, 3050 WATERTOWN ROAD - RENEWAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3136 It w®8 moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3136 for AppIIcatlon #1740, Stephen Harris of 3850 Watertown Road, approvinQ a renewal conditional use permit required for land alterations In excess of 100 cubic yards. Ayes 5, nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT A) Goetten indicated the newspapers have published an article which may have confused residents about the Pubiic Hearing to be held by MnDot. She noted that meeting is to be held on June 30th. She noted that the Pioneer newsoaper also printed an article indicating that MnDot has approved a plan approving the southern corridor as It Is the best as far as environmental concerns are concerns. She added this position came from a news release from Long Lake and had nothing to do with a decision by MnDot. Jabbour suggested that the City send a notice tc residents of the public hearing to be held by MnDot. B) Jabbour stated he has received cal Is from residents on Cygnet Place regarding the ftaff decision on the assessment. Ha indicated to the residents that the majority of the Council was not concerned about percentages, but rather what a court of law would find to be appropriate charges for the sewer. He was concerned that a deadline has not been Identified. He said at the last Council meeting he pushed for the usage of MSA funds for Leaf Street, and thought the money would be rebated. He thought the money may be used to off set the trunk charges for Cygnet Place If they opt not to Join the project. He felt the Council should meet prior to final date for abatements. Mayor Peterson noted that many residents believe that If MSA funds are used to restore Leaf Street, that money will be used to reduce the assessment. She felt they need to have an understanding of the I ssue in writing. Qoetton stated the Council has gone over-board to reach a fair settlement and the residents should understand fully that a future Council Is In no way bound to participate In future sewer extension should these areas opt not to Join in the project at this time. Jabbour noted that some of the residents on Cygnet Place are working hard to come to a resolve of the Issue. 4 rK )r i->. I' t-/ r:m ■■(■ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 22, 1992 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. Callahan requested the issue be discussed In executive session. C) Jaboour reported that he and Cal Iahan had met with Moorse, the architect and builder to discuss the concerns and progress of the City facilities. He said that logical and »* asonable explanation were given to concerns expressed at tbc Planning Commission meeting. He said that the Construction ‘lanager spoke very highly of the Building Inspectors. D) Jaboour reported there was a meeting o^ the LMCD Task Force. He said they are diversing from the standards for car/traller parking. He reported that the Task Force is also looking at creative parking, off-street parking to be reduced to 40’, Innovative ways for compact car parking, and launches for watercraft without trailers. He noted they are also looking at ways to reconfigure al • landings to get the maximum capacity allowed. He said ha has volunteered to an aerial survey on July 4th of the Lake. E) Callahan reported that the ordinance banning styrofoam docks needs to be published and reviewed by the Planning Commission prior to Council adoption. He statea because of newspaper deadline date , the Council will not be able to act on the ordinance for 60 days. He suggested they have pub Iicat I on dates. a alternative system to decrease ENGINEER’S REPORT Cook explained that the 1991 Transportation Act has changed funding for highways. He said that Hennepin County is requesting approval of a plan approving federal funding for County Roads 6 and 15. He noted the funding may be used for reconstruct ion or safety Improvements to the roadways. Qoetten reminded him that County Road 15 is a scenic parkway. She stated that because of environmental concerns ^or the Lake, Orono did not want County Road 15 to ever be upgraded. Jabbour stated that a roadway could not be Improved without City approval, no matter how It is funded. Butler did not agree with Jabbour’s statement. t'c m ;? r- h Vi . E': ■ i?% 1 I ].i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 22, 1992 ENGINEER’S REPORT - CONT. Cook felt that ^hls would be the time to send a message to the County regarding the City’s concerns about County Road 15. He said that If the County does not receive a response by June 30th, they will consider It approval by default. It was moved by Jabbour, to approve the plan submitted by Hennepin County for roads to be Included for federal funding, with the exclusion of County Road 15. There was no second. Moorse explained that It is planned that the County will present a safety Improvement plan at the next Council meeting. Butler said they should report to the County that they cannot make a decision until a later date. All Members agreed. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (ate) FINAL PAYMENTS ON COUNTY ROAD 15 STREET A LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve payment of City of Orono’s share of final costs for joint project with Hennepin County for the County Road 15 street right-of-way costs In the amount of $103,996.55, street lighting cost of $4,347.35, and street Improvement costs of $63,243.95; and approprI at Ing $65,240.60 from the P.I.R. road and Bridge Account and $4,347.25 from the P.I.R. General Account. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#g) LMCD PROPOSED 1993 ANNUAL BUDGET JoEilen Hurr was present. I'he an. *unced the next Board meeting will be held Wednesday, June 2ith. The Board will be reviewing the request for a Joint dock for 8ig Island Inc. Mabusth explained that the Council has approved a conditional use permit for the property, but the City has not yet received a dock license application. She suggested that the LMCD should not act on the request until the City is in receipt of the application. Hurr reported that on June 25th, the revised Legislative Commission of Minnesota Resources will hold a hearing on funding for accesses cn Lake Minnetonka. 6 r ?• !; u rr>-II h- r- fe- tv^;:. k-fev; !W- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 22, 1992 LMCO PROPOSED 1993 ANNUAL BUDGET - CONT. Hurr reviewed the proposed budget and noted the decrease In Orono’s share. Jabbour said he appreciated all the work by Scott and JoEIien on the budget. He felt that the LMCO may be relying too strongly on license and permit fees, which may be argued In court. Butler said for years the City has argued that the LMCO should rei/ more on user fees. Jabbour expressed his concern that Orono is not benefitting from the LMCO as much as other communities. Hurr noted that Orono does not have public docks and probably does not benefit the same as other communities. Jabbour stated that the LMCO needs to demonstrate the value they are to communities. Hurr reiterated that if all the cities around the Lake were restrictive as Orono, there wouldn’t be a need for the LMCO. (•10) SELECTION OF NAME FOR HIGHWAY 12 FRONTAGE ROAD It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Goetten, to estaollsh the name for the Highway 12 Frontage Road as “Les Kelley Memorial Drive", subject to approval by the family. Ayes 5, nays 0. (•11) CITY HALL & PUBLIC WORKS BUILDINGS APPLICATION t CERTIFICATE OF PAYMENT §4 It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve City Hall and Public Works Buildings Architect’s Application and Certificate for Payment #4 as presented. Ayes 5, nays C. (•12) WINDWARD MARINA ~ REQUEST FOR 1991 LICENSE FEE REDUCTION Gaffron explained that Mr. Rivers has requested a reduction In the 1991 license fees in order to make his fee equitable with the two other marinas who were granted concessions In 1990. He Is also requesting the Council waive the $50.00 late fee for the 1992 appI I cat I on. Butler said that the fact the Council in the past has granted concessions to other marinas indicates their willingness to be fair. She felt Mr. Rivers should only pay the $200.00 for the 1991 I I cense. eitii MINUTES OF THt REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD JUNE 22. 1992WINDWARD MAR:NA - REQUEST FOR 1991 LICENSE FEE REDUCTION - CONT. Callahan said that ev-iry time the Counc II tries to start fresh with regards to licensing marinas, they have difficur.y as to where they should start. He thought the Council had decided at a previous meeting that all marinas would pay their 19C1 and 1992 license fees, regardless of past decisions. He said that Rivers appeared before the Lake Use Committee stating he felt he had net received an answer to this request. Mayor Peterson agreed with Callahan. Goetten felt that they should waive the late fee. Rivers said he was just asking for equal treatment. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to direct staff to InformMr. Rivers to pay the full amount for license fees owned for 1991 and 1992. Ayes 3, nays 1. Butler voted nay. Jabbour abstained. Callahan said that this Is the current standard of the rulings of the Council in connection with marina licenses. Butler felt that It was unfair that all marinas did not get the reduced fee for 1990. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to direct S'-aff to waive the $60.00 late fee for the 1992 marina license for Windward Marine. Ayes 4, nays 0. Jabbour abstained. (•13) LEAF STREET RECONSTRUCTION UPDATE Moorse explained this is an update after the meeting on site with staff and the residents of the area after the sewer area had been staked. Qerhardson reported that after the meeting all had the understanding that the sewer would have the greatest impact to the property as It relates to removal of existing improvements. He said the residents were not convinced that a 28’ paved roadway would be appropriate. He said the residents are under the impression that there will be a separata meeting to inform the residents of the Council’s decision on this street. Butler asked If Cygnet and Leaf Street are not sewered, there will not be a need for the meeting. 8 §■ V ■ -^rh h:- ?:. -.-y.- w f-r %-\ irifd ’■'-'ri: •i^' -- • V' It'. - •■■ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 22, 1992 LEAF STREET RECONSTRUCTION UPDATE - CONT. Jabbour understood that they would still need to dig up the street to install the trunk line. Gerhardson noied It would be just to the Luce Line Trail. Jabbour asked how many other streets within the City are allowed the use of MSA funds. Gerhardson read off the list. Jabbour su9Qested they use the MSA funds for one of these other streets. Frank St. Lawrence, 253 Cygnet Place, said there was some confusion about the cost of the sewer project and the amount it would be reduced If MSA funds were used. Mary Lou Lutz, 258 Cygnet Place, said her main concern is safety, and lelt that If the road were wider it would be more unsafe. Sullivan noted that the road is fairly narrow and a wider road may be safer. He added that citizens typically see cars traveling faster than the actual speed. He said that if the road were widened, it may become a preferred shortcut. Gerhardson noted ho suggested to the residents that a sidewalk could be Installed along Leaf Street, but they were not receptive to that idea. (♦14) ESTABLISH A WORK SESSION TO DISCUSS MNOOT’S HIGHWAY 12 HEARING Moorse asked if the Counc i wishes the residents to be notified of the pub Iic hear Ing. Goetten felt that a postcard would be appropriate. Jabbour suggested that their expert testify at the public hearing. Mayor Peterson agreed with Jabbour. Butler suggested they continue the Council meeting to Wednesday, June 24, 1992, at 3:00 p.m. to continue discussion on the public hearing held by MnOot. it'’--.- . . m MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCi' MEETINGHELD JUNE 22, 1992(#15) ESTABLISH A WORK SESSION TO REVIEW THE PRELIMINARY 1993 ANNUAL BUDGET Mayor Peterson announced that a work session will be held on August 3, 1 392 at 3:00 p.m. in tne Council Chambers to review the preliminary 1993 annual budget. ATTORNEY’S REPORT - EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Peterson adjourned the regular Council meeting at 9;IT p.m. to Executive Session. («#16) LICENSES There were no license. (*•17) BILLS It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve payment of the All Funds Account, as revised. Ayes 5, nays u. ADJOURNMENT p. Ifw; feifcI? It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to continue the Orono City Council meeting to Wednesday, June 24, 1992 at 3:00 p.m. in the Orono Council Chambers. Ayes 5, nays 0. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor mfe:.* pBS; P lorothy Mr Ball In, City Clerk ‘if"'AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JUNE 22, 1992, 7:00 P.M. I:.. li: .si- 'f {*)Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the Cit/ Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon request Memos regarding each of tiie Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. ROLb CALL 1. CONSENT ACENDA* APPROVAL OF MI NOTES * 2. Regular Meeting of June 8, 1992 2 2 I99g •c' lav: 4., PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT - oFlIen Hurr Repr*^sentative POBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT ••APPLICANTS** Immediately after the Council has reviewed your application please sign the three (3) original resolutions at the Recorder's desk. Applicants need not execute resolutions for subdivisions, vacations and denials. * Z, #1679 William Miller, 2691 Casco Point Road - Variance - Resolution 4. #1706 William Knapp, 4300 Bayside Road - PRD/Subdivision - Request to Name Private Road * 5. #1732 Joan Sweetser, 945 Old Long Lake Road - Pinal Subdivision - Resolution 6. #1739 Albin Nelson, 500 Oxford Road - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution * 7. #1740 Stephen Harris, 3850 Watertown Road - Renewal Conditional Use Permit - Resolution fOiyOR/COONCIL REPORT BNOINEBR REPORT CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT * 8. Final Payments on County Road 15 Street and Lighting Improvements 9. LMCD Proposed 1993 Annual Budget 10. Selection of Name for Highway 12 Frontage Road 11* City Hall and Public Works Buildings Application and Certificate of Payment No. 4 Windward Marina - Request for 1991 License Fee Reduction Leaf Street Reconstruction Update Establish a Worksession to Discuss MnDOT's Highwiv 12 Hearing Establish a Worksession to review tne preliminary 199? Annual Budget 15. AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JUNE 22, 1992, 7:8« P.M. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT ■ = :t: hS-':’ m0 iii LICENSES (16*) BILLS (17*) AOJOOBNMBHT h \ X \A U INFORMATION ITEMS INCLUDED IN COUNCIL PACKET H«nio From Ron Moorse Dated 6/17/92 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Agenda 6/18/92 Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Memo Received 6/15/92 Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission Agenda 6/16/92 Sheriff's Department Letter Dated 5/1/92 Draft Preliminary Report: Metropolitan Council and Its Role in Regional Governance Miscellaneous Mail OTCOMING ISSDBS AMD EVENTS S6/2i - Work Session 6 p.m. Metropolitan Council Rural Development Policies - Barb Sennes SS/22 - Council Meeting 7 p.m. fS/24 - Lake Use Committee 7:45 a.m. - Council Chambers iS/30 - Public Scoping Document Public Heating i-7 p.m. Orono High School Cafeteria 7 p.m. presentation by MnDOT and public comments to follow •7/03 - Holiday - independence Day Observed (Friday) •7/07 - Park Commission 7 p.m. 07/0S - Lake Use Committee 7:45 a.m. - Council Chambers 07/13 - Council Meeting 7 p.m. •7/20 - Planning Commission 7 p.m. 07/27 - Council Meeting 7 p.m. R5,. ii»^ 1 /Im 'n I M ►w - Ifc 7'- ' ' : • i*.- WM'i$m- ■ -- 'r-i V, -v-^:c' I' ,:V 1; iSlsiliv: MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD JUNE 8, 1992 '^cy. % ROLL ^ The Council met on the above date with the following memb€(^j^ present; Mayor Barbara Peterson, Counc i Imembers Gabnet Jabbour, J. Oiann Goetten, Mary Butler and Edward Callahan. The following represented the Ci ty staff: Ci *y Administrator Ron Moorse. Public Works Director John Gerhardscn, Building & Zoning Admn1strator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant PIanning and ZonIng Admin 1st rator Michae1 Qaffron, Police Chief Stephen Sullivan, City Attorney Kevin Staunton, City Engineer Glenn Cook and City Recorder Ten Naab. Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M, (#1) CONSENT AGENDA Goetten removed Item #2. Butler added Items «5, 6, 7. and 9. Mayor Peterson removed Item #22. It was moved by Jabbo *, seconded by Butler, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. A. ^s 5, nays 0. Motions for all items adopted by consent agenda wilt be included In the minutes in their respective numerical order. (#2) APPROVAL OF MINUTES Butler stated that Men is spelled wrong on Page 10. Goetten asked that the time of adjournment of the Executive Session be added to the minutes. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Goetten, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Orono Cour.cil held on May 11, 1992 at amended. Ayes 5, nays 0. (••3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to approve the minutes of the continued Public Hearing for the Stubbs Bay Sewer Assessment Hearing held on May 18, 1992. Ayes 5, nays 0. (•5) t167g WILLIAM HILLER, 2891 CASCO POINT ROAD - VARIANCE WMMam Miller was present. mm % -a _5i'* #■ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 8, 1992 ZONING FILE #1679 - CONT. I varIance existing ^er-the-fact variance for structural mprovemen'ts to a gazebo/bathnouse l ocat ed w i th i n the 0-75’ setbacK Moorse explained that this is a request for a hardcover to construct a 22’x26’ detached garage, replacing an garage. and for an area Qoetten noted that even after the Stop work Order, construcLion continued on the gazebo. She was concerned about precedent setting with this issue and reminded the Council of others with similar app I i cat Ion.:! that had been denied. Miller stated that he had applied for a permit for the garage and durina the process the Inspector noted the work oeing done to the gazebo. He said he was unaware of Orono’s restrictions on hardcover. He added that after the Inspector had asked him to stop work on the structure, very high winds threatened to knock down the structure so some of the siding was added to the structure to prevent this. He said he did not cont stairway. nue work on the decking or Goetten asked Miller if he this need to continue work. ed the Inspector to notify him of Her said he had rot called the City office Qoetten said she was glad that the Council application back to the Planning Commission figures had changed since that review. had as referred the the hardcover Miller explained that he was originally using which was determined to be incorrect. a survey from 1968, for asking for aQoetten pointed v^ut that is the reason coisprehensive review of the entlie property. the lake He had Planning Commission he has a problem with structure is existing, that structure forever. He asked Staff If the applicant would be paying the appropriate after-the- fact fees. Jabbour reviewed that the structure serves as access to and the applicant is entitled to a stairway to the la<e no problem with agreeing with the recommendation on the gazebo. He said people feeling that since a non-conforming they have a right to maintain Mabusth concurred that the additional fees would be charged for the gazebo portion of the projecc. 'si%Tr b- r- (S 5:- li .'■* -4j-;^v'-’’‘Iff' mm- 5*''ifi'- ;. ■ ife^' MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE a, 1992 ZONING FILE #1734 - CONT. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3131 for ApoMcation #1734 for John Burger o^f 3750 Bayside Road, for preliminary subdivision approval.A/es 5, nays 0. Butler noted that in the letter from SP-Testing, Inc., a mercury float Is recommended. She asked about the safety factor of such a d#vice. Qaffron stated that they have not had any problems with this device and It Is very similar to what is used in a furnace thermostat. (••9) #1736 GREGORY C. PETERSON. 1920 SHORELINE DRIVE - RENEWAL VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3132 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to adopt Resolution #3132 for AppIIcatlon #1736, Gregory C. Peterson of 1920 Shoreline Drive, approving a renewal variance for the construction of a new residence. Ayes 5, nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Mayor Peterson announced to the residents in attendance that there would not be public discussion regarding the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project, and this Item would only be discussed during Executive Session. A) Butler read aloud an advertisement from the Wayzata Weekly Newspaper which advertised male and female dancers on the Miss Deduction charter boat. She suggested they bring this to the attention of the LMCO. B) Butler referred to a letter sent to the Council Members from Mr. Pick In which ht' expressed his concern that the City had not completed Its shoreland regulations. said she called him to report that Orono Is one of two cit'as who has submitted their new regulations. She noted the response she received from him was very patronizing. )"■ U^v m:- JpK<- ■ Ip ?m m m MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELL JUNE 8, 1992 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. C) Jabbour reported that he. Mayor Peterson. Callahan and JoEIIen Hurr met with the ONR to discuss potential oublic access sites. He said they mentioned to the DNR that Orono’s relationship with them goes beyond one public access. He said that Orono and MInnetrIsta were the first cities to adopt wetland ohiIosophies. He told the ONR that the City looks forwaro to the DNR’s input on the ram i f I cet I ons of Improving the ex’stirig Highway 12 corridor thrr>ugh Orono, specifically, the impact, of the southern alignment on the Luce Line Trail. 0) Jabbour reported that the sub-committee to the LMCO’s Task Force wlI I meet on June 10th and he wiI I be in attendance. E) Jabbour announced that last week an issue was brought up regarding his participation in marina issues. He said he is a marina owner, and would therefore step aside during discussions of marinas. He stated that his concerns about marinas would not subside. He noted that the City Attorney had opined that Jabbour does not have a conflict of interest in this area. Butler said she would hate to see this issue. him withdraw from discussion on Callahan felt that It was essential that he continue on the Lake Use Committee, and statad that if Jabbour is satisfied with the solution that would be Tine with him. F) Callahan referred to a letter from the LMCD which alludes to a Joint effort of the LMCD and the DNR to submit «i grant application for land acQUIsItion, He thought there wa» a Committee ••tabi I shed to determine the best site and asked why the grant application at this time. Jabbour reported that the study by the Committee did not move In an appropriate manner which was time-wise appropriate for the grant application. He understood that the LCMR was less likely to consider award of grant money without a specific or approximate site. Hoorse explained that the grant application includes only one specific site, and the remainder of the money Is to be used In general for sites on Lake Minnetonka. F'i Mh •' * I?: . # !■' I' , & ■ -■' '■ 1^ • ' '■v I -\.,. (>4* * ».-v' #1:.' ■!■ ■U"' 'siv’J4 v •!, . »■: j|-y ¥i^'r. k'?iv «J5* ■■ »’• .! !v ;' .^lll 'rW' FI?'’ t 'Af,>= ■ip?' ^ |p'.a*i:t;»c.'',m 7? -1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE a, 1992 («10) BID AWARD LIFT STATION #9 RENOVATION Moorse explained that this is a bid award for Lift Station «9. Butler asked where this Lift Station is located. Qerhardson reported that Lift Station is located on Bonns Point. Butler asked how old the current Lift Station is. Qerhardson said it was placed in service somewhere between 1965 and 1970. It was moved by Goetten, seconded oy Butler, to award tne bid for Lift Station #9 restoration to NewMech Compan.es, Inc. for an amount of $46,800.00. Ayes 5, nays 0. (•11) BID AWARD 1992 SEAL COAT PROJECT Mayor Peterson asked if this item falls within a budgeted amount. Gerhardson said it does. Butler asked what portion of streets would be included in the pro j ect. Gerhardson reported that the streets that were paved in 1991 v^ould be seal coated this year. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to award the bid for the 1992 Seal Coat Project to Omann Brothers for an amount of $9,174.40. Ayes 5, nays 0. (•12) AWARD OF BIDS FOR STUBBS BAY SEWER PROJECT Moorse explained this Is an award of bids for Stubbs Bay Sewer Project. He noted the final date for appeals is June I8th, and they have a good Idea at present of how many appeals they can expect. He suggested awarding the bids that evening in order to proceed with the project. Jebbour asked if it would still be possible to remove an area from the project If the bid is awarded. Moorse Indicated that would be part of an agreement that was discussed with the contractor. He noted that as part of this approval, the entire contract would be approved with the condition that the city has the option of deieting any portion of the project outside the base area within a certain time period. ... r ■ ■ ipf j^.1^ ^>:; ■'' ■ rift. r.V K‘ :Wp .:1 i '!'iif't \' ''^■ f?- ui^ r ■ ■ * ■■ ■ '<if' ifi.:ft'' ■’t . ■'- ■*-■ M^‘- K L ..f-' t -V'‘ ,'■. i ■* •■ - •„ ' ■ : "If i» -kM' ,yw |i#' '?'v: o;lP •;Ef ' l^ii‘fe ■< 1^-wm:, :y.' m,■'W:«: I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 8, 1992 AWARD OF BIDS FOR STUBBS BAY SEWER PROJECT - CONT. Staunton asked if there were provisions alternative portions separately. the bid to do the Cook stated that was not included in the bid. Butler asked if staff felt confident that language could be incorporated with the bid award that would assure the City the right to delete a portion of the bid at a future date. She thought they should wait the 30 days. Qoetten asked what Is the expected completion date Cook reported that they would not be able to start for aoout 1 1/2 weeks and completion is expected approximately November 1st. Staunton stated they would need to draft language for the agreement on which both parties would agree. He did not feel that would be a problem. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Callahan, to award the bids for the Stubbs Bay sewer project reserving the right to delete any portion of the project at the original bid amount for a period of 30 days from tne date of expiration of the appeal period, subject to the agreement addressing all of :ounciI’s concerns. Jabbour withdrew his motion. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to award the bid for the Stubbs Bay sewer project reserving the right to delete any portion of the project at the original bid amount for a period of 30 days from the date of expiration of the appeal period, subject to the agreement addressing al l of Counci I's concerns, in the following amounts:i Base Area Aiternate Site AIternate Site AIternate Site AIternate Site $802,913.00 162,152.20 30,621.25 381.671.75 112.973.75 Total Contract Amount $1,480,331.95 Ayes 5, nays 0 iHiiu MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 8, 1992 ‘ i U:. :l,'fee- ia 5 L X%'V- u ^ '■ ‘ f-.. Jr' ]• :,.f- ifa t.' #j: (•13) PREPARATION OF PLANE. AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF LEAF STREET - RESOLUTION #3132 Moorse explained this is a request for authorization from the Counci I to move ahead in the preparation of plans and specifications for reconstruction of Leaf Street. Cook explained that the portion of Leaf Street reconstruction will be removed from the sewer bid and constructed with MSA funds. He noted they are looking at a couple of options, an urban/rjral section or a total rural section. The street would be approximately 32’ when finished. Butler asked how wide the road is currently. Cook said It is 21-22’, with the shoulder areas in lieu of curb and gutter. He noted the shouIder-to-shouIder width of the road Is 26*. He added the reconstruction would involve Leaf Street from County Road 84 to Watertown Road. Butler reported that MSA funds can only be used if the road connects to another MSA street or State Highway. Cook noted that the sewer construction will impact the vegetation In the area more than the street reconstruction. Jabbour asked the width of the existing right-of-way. Cook said the right-of-way is 66’ wide. Jabbour stated that no one wants to encourage the widening of a roadway. He asked Cook what the residents in the area would be saving by using MSA funds. Cook explained there is an approximate $100,00 difference. He noted the road constructed to MSA standards would cost more because of the additional amenities. He indicated that the City could apply for a variance to the road standards that would allow construction at a 28’ width. Butler felt they should apply for the variance. She asked if they would be able to box the sewer construction to stay within the rIght-of-way. Cook noted they would be using this method as often as possible. Qoetten said she assumed this project would be done in a timely manner. 8 V'.,- \ m th I !(• (;iK 1^y.?W.lt ri/i’ r U>- .!• 3^#. i'! r j- .[. -i- f!-- fv-^ r v ’y y vi fs:: !«■ I- •:V.- n:mpi-M r#f:lpff Mu K ■ ■■■ ■■ i-:t0 tk» t: ■ ? • vi ^ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COv.NCIL MEETING HELD JUNE a, 1992 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS - LEAF STREET - CONT. Cook noted this project would be coordinated with the project. He felt that the wider road would not increase the levels on the roadway, but would only make the road safer. sewer speed It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to direct the Cit/ Engineer to prepare plans and specifications for the reconstruction of Leaf Street, and to consider the variance request to allow the street to be constructed at a 28’ width. Cole Graham, 95 Leaf Street, asked If the residents of the area would be notified of the public hearing regarding this issue. Mayor Peterson said they wouid be notified at the appropriate time Jabbour asked the residents if they would prefer to pay for the road reconstruction themselves. Jane Behrman, 340 Leaf Street, said she had a petition to hand in with 100% opposition of the reconstruction project to widen the road. She stated that she did not wish the City to apply for the MSA funds. She said she was told by the City Admi nistrator that State funds could not be used for the sewer project. Mayor Peterson said the Counci I understands this position, but they must review all options. Bob MInkema, 3200 Bayside Road, stated that they have already been informed of what their assessment will be for the sewer project. He did not see any benefit to using MSA funds which would widen the roadway and in effect create a high speed roadway. He saic he did not want the road to become a short-cut and was concerned for the safety of the children in the area. Qoetter. said she thought the residents were concerned about having the lowest assessment possible for the sewer project. She said the Council has tried to find all possible ways to reduce this amount. Behrman stated they do not want the assessment lowered at the expanse of the beauty of the street. Graham asked when they could expect the results* of the plans and spec IfI cat Ions. Cook said It would take about one month to prepare >1 \I . 4* MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 8, 1992 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS - LEAF STREET - CONT Gerhardson noted they do not have to have a pubiic hearing for the project, and suggested a public meeting instead. He indicated that the road could be staked to allow the residents to visualize the affect on their properties. Jabbour asked what the City’s chances were for tne variance request. Cook felt that they had a 90% chance of approval. He noted that current City standards require a rural roadway to be paved at a 24 width with 3’ shoulders, or a paved area of 28’ with curb and gutter. He noted the disadvantage of Leaf Street is that it is so straight. Goetten asked the speed Iimit of the road. Gerhardson said it is 30 MPH. Jabbour asked when the road is reconstructed. if it has to follow current standards. Co.-'k reported that the City allows replacement in kind. Jabbour suggested staking the str#»et at the minimum the City would allow and the width of a MSA roao. Goetten suggested that the Police Department patrol the area more Pat Crane stated he signed the petition based on information that ha was unsure about, but through the discussion his questions have been answered. He felt the difference in the paved area was insignificant and stated he would rather save the money on the assessment. C.C. Graham, 95 Leaf Street, felt that the widening of would change the character of the area. She requested Council approach this issue with great caution. the road that the Brian Ehalt, 140 Leaf Street, noted he has small children, but does not allow them to ride on the road currently. He noted the (jlff^fence between a 28’ road and a 32’ road may destroy pine trees on his property. Behrman asked why Leaf Street was the only street singled out. ^ -- -- mmf-m . VN-T-"- fe; »’! ' Is/' U: Irift ffS^h:.. K^v: fr- N- fi- /iu' >? ' ;v"’ ;.r •, 5 ' V.' •P- ’’ ? ■ ■ t'V >;tvv., ftW-:- IP K’"-'' r'fp-' , (“"1 ‘ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD JUNE 8, 1992 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS - LEAF STREET - CONT. Butler reminded her that in order to be a MSA street, it must connect with another MSA street at each enc. Cook noted that Cygnet Place probably would not meet the criteria for a MSA street because of the vertical alignment. Ehalt asked If the hill on Leaf Street would be changed. Cook said it may be changed slightly. OMie Peterson, 475 Oxford Road, said she travels the road often and felt It would be safer at a wider width. Qoetten asked if a fog line could be added to the side of the road for bikers. Ehalt felt that would take away from the rural character. Mayor Peterson asked if brush and shrubs are removed from private property during ths project, If they would be replaced by the City. Gerhardson said that would be a possibility. Motion: Ayes 5, nays 0. Jabbour suggested they stake the area of the sewer project also. (#14) USE OF CDBG FUNDS FOR STUBBS BAY SEWER SERVICE CONNECTION COSTS Moorse explained that he has discussed this issue with Larry Blacksted from the County who has Indicated that the funds can be used in two ways: 1. Using the money for the actual assessment, which would require an entI re area to qualIfy for the use of the funds. He noted that the dollar amount allocated to the City would only pay for a couple property assessments. 2. Using the funds for the cost of the sewer connection from the lateral to the residence. He noted that staff recommends the sacond alternative. He said that Council should determine if they wish to use 1992 or 1993 funds or both. X* ' ■. »'*lit: '•»;rV -* r' p:'' I ->■ ‘ lujv-:, •Vi; ft.v .' •i:r ^1* ilv- . '‘♦•I.'. ■' I? '\ii! jsfi''- ••V .m ■ ■■ ills * *.;• . iH'j •• y • .W- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONC COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 8, 1992 :DBG FUNDS - CONT Jabbour felt that since the Council has allocated a portion of the 1992 funds to home improvement, they could use that amount for the sewer project. Goetten felt that if there are people in need of the funds for other improvements, they should not be denied. Moorse said that the County is currently accepting appiications for the funds for 1992. Butler noted the sewer wi I I not be ready for connection untiI 1993. Gerhardson Indicated that the City has 1 1/2 years to expend the money. Goetten felt that since the money won’t be needed unti I 1993, they should not use 1992 funds. Jabbour disagreed and felt that the properties on Lake Street and next to the public landing are in great need of the sewer and felt that the City should encourage immediate hookup. Gerhardson reported that the 1993 funds will be available as of July 1993. Jabbour withdrew his objection. All Members agreed that they would not use the 1992 CDBG funds for the Stubbs Bay Sewer service connection costs. (#15) AWARD OF BIDS FOR PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY EQUIPMENT Moorse explained that the hoist is the number one priority to award as It needs to bo Installed early In the project. He there are Items In the service equipment section that shouId be Installed within the early portion of the project. He stated they would continue to review the fuel distribution system, and the overhead cranes do not fit into the budget. Jabbour asked If the amount listed for the fuel distribution system was correct. Moorse stated that is the bid price, which also included a number of other I terns. ■ ■ I- ; -r -T fe- fe:-lli. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 8, 1992 AWARD OF BIDS FOR PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY EQUIPMENT - CONT. Jabbour strongly suggested they consider above ground tanks as he has heard potential of having the in-ground tanks abolished by the year 2000 and excessive insurance requirements for in-ground tanks. Moorse explained that the contractor felt that the cost of both above-ground and in-ground s/Stems are very eq-.jai . It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to award the vehicle hoist bid to Pump and Meter in the low bid amount of $30,513; and to award the service equipment bid to Zahl in the low bid amount of $31,712. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#16) FINAL PAYMENTS ON COUNTY ROAD 15 STREET AND LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS Moorse requested this item to be tabled to the next meeting. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to table discussion on final payments on County Road 15 Street and Lighting Improvements to the next meeting. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*#17) PHEASANT LAWN GOOSE RELOCATION PROGRAM It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to authorize payment of $200.00 toward the cost of the goose relocation program for 1992. Ayes 5, nays 0. Ray Hartman, representing residents of the Pheasant Lawn area, noted this is the fourth year of the four year program. He reported that the goose population has dropped from approximately 360 to 60. He felt it would be difficult to totally eliminate those as some are ful I grown and can fly away. He asked the Council to consider this as an on-going program, and perhaps City wide. Goetten suggested he submit a proposal to the City Administrator. (♦#18) TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE - PARK DEPARTMENT It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to authorize the employment of Stephen Carlson, 1185 Arbor Street, as a temporary park maintenance helper at an hourly rate of $7.00 per hour effective June 9, 1992. Ayes 5, nays 0. nt’ij.,:...1^.1 ■ ! If.- ’i i’ ■■i-^y ■ &‘¥, P ’-4-. !k ri tfeiwR- m- |i< Bi' I; .=■- i ■• B4 ;j^- i-- 1^ i- w m 'V-l>'-'fa V ■;.-SHJ: i>- " pi- I?’ i®'#-m -P' - •mu -p.’ ^t MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING held JUNE 8, 1992 (»il9) 1992 POLICE LIEUTENANT CONTRACT SETTLEMENT It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to approve the contract settlement, to authorize the City Aominirtrator to prepare contract language reflecting the settlement items, and to author <.e the Mayor and City Administrator to sign the contract. Ayes 5, nays 0. (♦20) ATTORNEY’S REPORT - EXECUTIVE SESSION It was moved by Butler, seconded b> loetten, to acjourn the regular Council meeting at 8:45 p.m. to Executive Session. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*♦21) LICENSES It was moved by Jabbour, following Iicenses: seconded by Butler, to approve the Kennel License - Residentia Stephen G. Esco, 230 Big Island Rodney Crawford, 4705 North Shore Drive Garbage A Refuse Collector: Westonka Sanitation Motion, Ayes 5, nays 0. (♦22) BILLS ^ Mayor Peterson questioned the amount to Strgar Roscoe Fausch. Moorse stated he would check into it. It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Goetten, to approve payment of the All Funds Account, as revised. Ayes 5, nays 0. «»*» Butler asked Chief Sullivan about an accident on County Road 15 on the previous Friday. Sul I Ivan reported that two cars were traveling westbound, one tried to pass on the right and was hit by a car merging from a side street. Three people were hospitalized. Jabbour announced that Sul Iivan would be in jaiI on June 22. Sul Iivan clarified that he was being jailed by the Lake Minnetonka Chapter of the American Cancer Society to raise funds through bail. Callahan asked if there was an unpainted patrol car in Spring Park. Sullivan noted they are waiting for the striping. Ai-• ’ •'■Ti T-'7*,;-^ ■ y.> "»• F^v- ■Y ‘ > : 'i ; t;-ji ^ (fj'‘. il^vSifc. I ;yMINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD JUNE 8, 1992 ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Executive Session Butler, seconded by Jabbour, of the Council at 9:^.5 p.m. to adjourn the Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hal I In, City Clerk ■i •n/' c7.*>^ ^ ^O te’^te'.- ii? ' : : w Mi:i;HA|i*«' A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 FILE #1679 WHEREAS, William F. Miller (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 2691 Casco Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: All that part of Government Lot 4, Section 20, Township 117, Range 23, lying between Orono Avenue and Lake Minnetonka and between two lines drawn parallel with the southerly line of Lot iftf Spring Park, and distant southerly therefrom respectively 30 and 90’, all according to the plat of Spring Park on file in the office of the County Recorder in and for L_nnepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and repair of an existing gazebo/lsathhouse structure located Mn tine 0—75 setback area totalling 344 s«f* or 7*64% hardcover gp Where ho structure or hardcover is allowed and approval of a hardcover variance within the 75-250* setback area for construction of a 22'x26* det^hed garage be located in the . ^ar/street yard where excesses of hardcover exist and the proposed construction will result in 3,430.95 s.f. or 32.75% where only 2,625 s.f. or 25% is allowed. ■®"' THBWtrOBB, BB IT RBSOLVBD by the City Council of Orono, [^|y||r ^Minnesota: ' FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1679. The property is located in the LR-lC Zoning District requiring 21,780 s.f. or .5 acres in area. The subject property consists of 16,933 s.f. or .39 acre. Page 1 of 6 ii j Q m Wviv mm- ,y?' ':i i; /‘ ■ 0' Mte. . «iiav,iiiir,. a) The gazebo/bathhouse structure has existed on the property prior to 1968. Current standards for 1973 by ’the''city.^®’'®*'’°'® P*’°Perties were adopted in b) ^ improvements completed for the "*’*= involve expansion of the existing building envelope of structure nor did it involve an intensification of structure. ^3.28% hardcover within the 75-250 setback area. Applicant proposes hardcover'^?o °/f 10-53% of existinghardcover to offset proposed structural Improvements. d) The current proposal minimizes the impact on existlno steeper topographies to south side of property. The city Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to ther property in this zoning district; that granting the would not adversely affect traffic^conditions? pose a fire hazard or other danger to property; would not merely serve^ as a venience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to llVlTtl applicant7anSi keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. zoning Sie considered this application including reconmendations of the Planning Commission, JffSet staff, comments by the applicant and the\\\ 7oruri?yr""“"“* Page 2 of 6 •^. V..-V! p:«Iw' MIW' ■ •• S*l;^“' §'fei.- •• ■k ft COHCLDSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more ot the above findingsr the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10,22, Subdivision 2 to permit construction of a 22'x26* detached garage within the street/rear yard of the property and an after the fact variance for structural repairs completed without the benefit of a building permit to an existing gazebo/bathhouse structure located within the lakeshore protected area, subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall apply for a penalty building permit for all work completed for the repair/renovation of gazebo/bathhouse structure by June 30, 1992. 2. Applicant shall remove 1,105.05 s.f. or 10.53% of existing hardcover as shown on page 6 of this resolution. Applicant shall have completed the removal of exis‘:ing hardcover prior to the footing inspection for detached garage. 3. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant^ but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit for the detached garage within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (June 22, 1993). 4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5. The undersigned a olicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the tei.as of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. :v .><• ■M •.'I Page 3 of 6 -i-. me 1992. ATTEST: Adopted by 'ihe Orono City Council on this 22nd day of June, Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Pr^MiHer Property Owner(s) y-fl STATE OF MINNESOTA ^ONTY OF HENNEPIN w The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd day of June, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson a Dorothy M. Ha 11 in, flayor a city Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal Corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. fcp- liPI-'. I•TCX•I (5^ '■ Jivlto.' I: • . « .• . I • •#♦ %To:%Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Men&^ Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Front Date: Jeanne A, Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator^"^ % % June 17, 1992 9 Subject: #1706 William & Evelyn Knapp, 4300 Bayside Road - Subdivision/Planned Residential Development - Request to Name Private Road m(is V ■■ The applicants have proposed three road names for the naming of the private road within the subdivision/PRD now known as Cristofori Woods. The names selected are as follows; 1. 2. 3. Cristofori Circle Starlight Trail Tree-Top Lane r-i -I • mm.-m Staff has reviewed the name selections to determine if there are any conflicts with the existing road names per the attached Hudson Directory Sheets. Staff finds no conflicts with existing road names. In consideration of the length of names, all three selections can be placed on a standard sr.reet sign although it is staff's understanding that the Knapp's will install their own street signs based on the standards adopted by the City's Public Works Department. I •’ Council is asked to approve one of three road names for the private road to serve three residential units within the Cristofori Hoods plat. Attachments Isv m:-: ■fv: . i iV- 9 • t life".-y V, ;V* fe■fe-r r. ' ; r;-^ -: ‘ 1^1: ■ i *. * m'Uyy V:V'":v^'i I \ 4 ■iv'-V ■ ■■■ •! *.' .;• ■' ’• y '. JIV, ‘■•' -• . ,i *• * I®, -my #• # -•J^r-v * I UUCiEUD'W'diyCITY OF ORONO PRIVATE ROADWAY REQUEST A. The subject of this request is D. D. ■JUN 1 '6 1992 an existing private roadway. X a proposed private roadway which is to be created as a condition of pending subdivision approval. The owner(s) of this Private Roadway and/or ill abutting property will be (are) the owner(s) of the following described property: OcJTU/T C %»< C. The above owner(s) hereby request that this Private Roadway be li.nown by the following name: Choice No. 1 C^/SrOJ^O^I CjRC^cG Choice No. 2 Smi^A^lirhT ~ne.HlC^ Choice No. 3 /d)/* (List three choices in order of preference. The City Council will approve a name provided no conflict exists with existing names or naming policy. If all names have a conflict, you will be asked to make new choices. The approved name will be used for all mailing address and official identification purposes.) The above owner(s) hereby request the City of Orono to install the following standard street and traffic signs and said owner(s) hereby agree to reimburse the City for all costs of said installation. (Such signing may be required as part of a separate Developer's Agreement and/or subdivision request.) standard city street name sign(s) -* number required standard "STOP" sign(s) - number required standard traffic sign(s) described below: - number required The above owner(s) do hereby acknowledge the (future) existence of said private road, and that the City of Orono has no obligation to maintain or service said private road, and that the City of Orono does not Intend to acquire or open said private road as a public roadway. Slgnature(s) of owner(s): )^\i Da tc Da te ? t. I •s • f vp J‘ ... C c .* p. i • • !• .*/• \\ *. \ • j. #• •• • *.f V • %• • ( u .y »• »• t I .1 • \ ,rI ‘'t* X *. . • r'"' S X • $ t \». . V'l.' . * w - ■ {.* • • ■ *1:- ••• j ?: .1-• sr. •• ■<ry ‘ • V. *i H • / >r : i* . r r:-k: 1 3 • .-: :->■—.z=rr?u.T r :.A’^gr.er.z^st ' r I* .1 I li » ) COv*r^ oo 140 CCXwTy DO NO *40 COu^rry »o no **o C cC nty ■o'^ \io CCUNTN no NO 140 CCUNFr no NO ^*T CCl;NT> no NO *«r CC ijNT n »o no *S0 CCi-NTr no NO ’40 CCcnry noNO -5* OCunnr no no ’4’ CCcNnr no NO *51 • T CHf OOT •NO cn CA C m» HAS »OGurn cn n C ’ COtiNTN no NO 15J BT county no NO ’VJ COUNTY no NO »53 §T Bf . - - ;c *'« . _ 40-4AA •0-4AA 4>^4« rC «4A8 .y:-7> • 8.VJ 4A SJ ?<V-4B ^ a-a8 :o-;? • 0.-7 304«a 3A-40C 10>V3A «0>4JB ................._ 4A A3 *0^4«C 0-4*8 ;8->J4ACOUNTY no NO 154 LT’ COUNTY no NO 14S 1NTT ________ ______________ :Osj0A 2>-i*A COUNTY no NO 148 CnY COUNTY no NO ^03 **AN :B-4« COUNTY no NO r03 has 3a -*8 COUNTYnONOtr -..........IA-40 COUNTynONOir UA ___________3A^ couPTTno un____________________ rc-32 COUNT ST nns __________ cat COUNT ST feCL _________ 30 rt COUNT ST N BCL—.- ’>r% COUNT ST W Sfl. ;0--5 COuNTMOUat BLVO fO 30-4.3 COUATNOUSf BCVO Oh •a ^-'a -M COunr>NX;se euvo u -m COUNT mOUSC BkVOCTtOH 4C-51 COUNTL>NOnu STN____ 20-2» COuniXANO NO M«______ 2C-^2 counti >nost ex._______ . ;cvj’ COUNILTNO ____ ___3C-07 covt AVI SINN______ ________20-54 COvCNTNrnOe MN _____JC-Jl COvfNTNrnoiN UA :c 37 COvtNTNT WAY £0 .. JC-A* COVINGTON UA CO _______ 2A-5A COMNOTON LAMM _____ .. ____5A-3B COViHOTCNCkN EO____ _____2A 54 CC v.NQTO n C iN MN . .................... SAOt COVINGTON CT €0 .. .........................2A 54 COVINGTON CT UU ................... ‘A-AO COVINGTON NATH WN .. . 4A-Jf COVINGTON no NK . . 50-J1 COV1NOTONNO Sh N . 40-J1 C0V1NGT0NST ano 3C-3I COVINGTON TEN MA .................... 5A >)t COWBOY no NfO-------- iC-15 COWENNnu NSn .............................1A 74 cnA4AnnvEi> tbt io--»» CNACAtEaennY al CV w8 78-as CIUCnLltEnNT BAY WB . 34-45 CNACKLEBCNNY CT WB................. ;B-45 CNACKCEBCnNY TN A»B 7B-«5 C^5AiQ AVC C *OM . . 50-A4 cnAOONfn iaao CNAlO nt MW . 5« 71 CNAOnt srn .......... •§ 75 CnXiOWAT TN 3B-*0 CNAABNOOn WAY '« . . 7B-*0 CNANBfNNT la cn ......... lA-lO CNANBNOOH ON WB« 1A-7I CAANBSTNWCN^____________________4&A CNATinST BNN ------------------- .^54-57 CNAWnONONO MK _ ............ AC-G7 CNAwnoNorr nw __________ jb-it CNeorr nrvtn bcvo cnt ... _ CNfOfT nivf N NO SE an ____SB-47 >C-44 CNU ON CNN_____________________ 4B-3B CNfl la U___________________ JC-5A CNtlfTNWCN......................... 7AA CnECXAYf MH_____________ 3B-U CNffHONfO ____________ . 3aa » cnccxLAyo__________ 40A5 4A-rr CNfinnoiN UH___________ 4A^7 cnecH KNOLL no cn -------------------------«b-4 7 cneCKnANnoN mh _____________ ia -40 cneCM nnNN la mn _______________ia -ao CNORNONfT urn__________________iA-40 CNCCK NmC NASB MN ____________1AA0 CNCCK VALL£Y no CO------------------------lAAl CNCCK View cm CON-----------------------30-4B CNtIK View m MN -_____________Sa -JB CNCfK View NtOGC MN_____ _ 4AOB CnCCKMOOeCT NA ----------------------------ia -N> CNCCRNtOOC ON LP_____________ SB-47 CntCKMOGCnL MA-------------------» .1AA0 CNttAlNOOC TN IML_________________iA-a O CNfCAlBeNOON MA_______________4A-Jf cnecKSiceciN cnt ________________20-M CNtensiocoN MA________________1A-A1 CNetAsioc ON se nn ______________*b-47 cneinSJOCCT cn------------------ .jb-nj CNecASoeoN loi-------------------------------2c-n CNCtKBMLA /T--------------------------------48-Vi CNCMOBLA MA__________________’a -a G CNillCVieW ON SwnN ___________3C-B7 CNecwewLA co-----------------------------3b-4i CNffKVlCWLA cn_________________IA-a O CNCCJCVICW TINL MA-------------------------3A-02 I ( cn*€‘wcxy> r^-N . <4-42 CA^ST4 l L4«f SL .-O nf 5C- »• caff • MOt'O C n C«I ____:s-M CA-^STAi LA4| pc 9«n 24 Wf CNff*woco cn c»^ _ ._ .. IA-A4 Cia>»S*AL L4«i l^in *«N lA-Pf CNf f *rwOCO CN fp____________ 4A.AI CA y'st4l .’f w r n fnt«___ l4-4f CPf firwoco CAT_____. .......2B-AA CULLtNAYf __________ 4B-A.1 COCinwoco *»0 CAT____.;b-m CLfLLlN ST SSA ______30-34 c»f scent t»v lA ;r CLLlLN ST STP ..............._5C-)5 CaiSCCMT EO .- :a -4»CLLLXI anl A CatSCfNT PQ W.0 :aoo C lll»GAN way u <44 .*0 CAESCCNT ST Uff .8-31 riLYfnno IV •o- *•• C"!5Cfsr fn 3C- 13 C lm«€ al >ho C* ' V •C- ’ • C»f 5CIMT »<»£ oo M4 4A J7 CUM0f Pi 4n O *0 fp 10-40 CBfSJ»YAV“f *M _ O-l Cuv.MnL>-0 oo wo XI-30 CPfSTAVf CPM . ..?B-J»CLM4£P l4n 0P0 mp\*0-34 ?0 U CPfST AVE N4 an 50^5S ’>S4 CLMff Plano st stp 55-27 CPfSTCT MA ____AOfB CL44B€AL4N0 ST sv ... 5C- • 1 CPfSTOn BAN _____ iO-M CUM M no NO in con ................ 30-48 CnCST ON MG ____iC-f C umm 'NOS o 4*4 ^ . 35- ’• CPfSTLA to __ _____ _. - LA-4t CUNffN TP •GM . _ 4A-SI C»€ST no BL — _______. 30-47 CLNffN CT f <iH ______ 45-41 CBfST no MA ____.. 10-lS cunprwsT sm _ 'O-l* CPf 5T no w MA . .’CV25 CuNAf LL BLVO Wf . « iC-37 cmSY HAVfN c* ssp_________30-14 Cunnif AVf MW .................. •• IV cnf sn HE CN wee ____ ’8-71 CUPNif AVf N MPV . __-X 24 enfS^OMno EO ___« . .4B-4*Cunnif ST MW _______’5 TS CnCSTOMf CT w nM ____. . _ 4A-: 3 CUNTV.f ST € STP ,. .. 3C-35 CniSTONiPArMW PM . 4A- M CUNTX.E $T W STP . ,‘C. >4 CnfSTPioOf on B»*4 _____________3CS7 Ci;N*/f A -i 10 . ... ______ 4C-33 cnf5T«»00E cn UA ____ SC 24 CUAVf ST GAO ______ 3C-31 CnfSTniOOE la fO .*8-30 CUAVf ST MW . ... - 4A.;f CnfSTSJOEAVf ino .JO-11 CUAVf ST s*"*58-21 CBfsrvicw c^^S •(1-AA Cu»vE CAIST SivO W Sw 58-2*4 CafSTVeWAvf 5A ;s CUSTfns ’PI <;w 3A S’ CPfSTVTWAYf cn 3022 CUT AcnOGS PO jV 3C 23 f.af STViFW C.n C hn .'BOf CUTlCn ST ‘,*P 1 A >J7 CP€2T\-ew CN C hn 4B-3A 25.35 CUTOff TP n«f ..... *C AA CBf STVlfW ON 44W _ . 1A>J7 CUTY-fPST ««__________0-7 CPfSTViFWON SA ’O-’f c>QMrr PL on . ............- SC-22 CniSTV’FWLA M4 2C-32 CYMTV iui cn MA ..........50-J1 Cni 3TV*EW LA SV _34-'•CYPNEsa cn CHN _____ 5A.35 cnesTv.cw no mo______JA-10 CYPWfSSO £p . 30-40 CniSTWAY la wsp ..LA-44 C ypnes Sla mo „. .. 38-30 cnfSTwooocin u<4A 17 CT^PPfSS LA MO _ *0-5 cmsrwoooon ma . .30-32 CYPPfSS ST -AS . .. _ ’C 2A emsTwooo pv wtL 5A 20 CYP1>ESS MW 30- A> cnf srwooo no bl lA-a CYPPfSS 5T STP . .. _ 30-25 enfSTwooo Tf n fp SB-4A DcnfSTWOoorfn sw SA 2»A CAfTEX AVf 5m«30-47 CnmN AVC M ST»2> 33 20-17 OCT CB __________’B-tO CAEYlNAVf S STP 2B-35 OST con ___________________*8-7 CniSTYcm AV . 4G *f OST HP _______________ ,_________4A-«5 CnOCKENAVf CD 4C-3J D ST MEM ,________3A-43 .CnOCuSLA -O 2A. *7 O'CHf ME C:n MTP ... .’C27 cnoCUSPL STP SB-33 0 C h En E la MTP .iC27 CAUCUS ST MT JA 11 OABLTOuf ST £ SW _______iB-l’B cnocus ST MW AN 40 *8 302 OAOUC AVI s APT 48-44 cnocus ST MW cn «5.4 OAOuEAvE SE»nr 40-48 48-*48 CnOCUS ST NW OOT . 4A 6 cnoPT CN am , _ . 40- 54 CnOTT ON SA . »C- »• cnorrv*rN T£n u« ’8 37 CnOiAV'CW on S Af 3*-JTe cnC‘TwoO0 B lyO s*y 4B.21A cnotrwoCOPL aw «b-7*a CncuYwfti AVI S'P 30-7T CnOMWCLL CT unv 50-JJ CnCMwELLONCn 58-4 ’ CNOMWCLL ON MPL ’0-L4 CNOUACO LA*e BIVO cn . 3B-4 CNOO a CO LAAl LA cn------------------------30-1 CnOSBY AVf E AIM . ............ 50-44 CNOBBYPL MNl________ 3C-A4 CnOlBV NO WAY ________ 70-74 CNOBBYLANf NO STP .................... . 4U.L5 CNOSaST AN_____________- - — IA-4 CNCiASr WAY 1A-74 CNOSS no«NT NO MTB . IB-J* CNOSBANONA ST se nn - CnosSTOWN BLVO CHS '0-44 cnoSBTCWN BLVO NW AM *0-iC 1A^ CnOSBTOWNBLVONWMt X-’C cnoMTowNON rn - >a -4« CNOSSWAY cn „ — _5C-5 CNOSSWAYB LAAC on CT _ ........4BJA CNOWAVC «NO_ - 2A-14* CNOW ma SSCN N ana no ham ... tC-ab CNOW Nfvcn ON HAN_________ iC-48 CNOW NfVtN ON HAB_______________'C-7A cNownoot CT cn----------------- 40-40 CNOWNCIN mm __________ - _ 1A-A3 CNOWNCT M*4........ 4A-0 CNOWNON cn_____________ 3B-40 CnOWNON MA___________ . 3C-3J cnowNNO rm_____________ 3a -»b CNOWNfT MA......... 30-32 CNOWW MAX CT WBL -----------------------^^-31 CNOWN NONET ON MM ---------------------5A-4J CnOYOCN LA CD__ 30-13 cnusAOCNAve wsn --------------ia -aa CNYSTALAVe AM .. .lA-’t CNYSTAcAVe ON _ 20-71 CnrSTALAW $V . . - -SA-*t CN ySTa ^. CT Li____________ 3C-SA CNYSTALONC ban ________________3A-4B CiWSTALDNW BNM_____________ 1A-4B C ntstal nl on _ lA^ CNYST al bay IAO on . SB-30 OAHU AVf MW _ OAHC CT MW ___ ^ OAMi no cn Oahl Gaem no OGT OAHionf M *0 ma 04HL1A on IB 0A-4U.A ST MT OAh LIA ST NW AN OAmtA ST MW cn OAh OMO AVf AM OAiarrcT turn „ . .. DAISY CT wBt C3AAOTA Avt CHN _ OAnOTA AVf CnT OAAOTA AVf ON ^ CAAQTA AVf S BL OAAOTA AVf s OV OAAOTA AVf S SO . OA/^OTA AVf S SL OAnOTA CIN 84___________ OAAOTA Ct* CHN ______ OAAOTA CJN MNL Oaa OTa ct bnm ______ OAAOTA la CHM OAAOTA no Bi OAAOTA ST NNS OAAOTA ST $MA OAAOTA ST WSN . OAAOTA ST NW AN OAAOT- ST Si NN OAAOTA TN to _ . Oaa OTah ST NW cn Oal C how no Mfn . dale AVf ONN OALlAVf CO___ oalict NV ____ D ale ct n sv____ OALC CT S sv____ OALfCUN BL Oal I on CO CAci NV ssn---------------------- oal C no MO ____ — oalc no wB___ CALC ST ny _ oalc ST ssn____ oalc 5T sv _____ OAUE ST N rm CALC ST S STN .. oal CV tew on Bn _ OALLAOCNWAV SW 3B-S4 1A-44 30-15 lA-Gl 30-If i- SCOTV* SHC»E BlvO c* r»- £:A.:a scuTw c« Sit scurvi $MO»e u» ‘a-ji SCU"^ rw«f A • (X5€ '■ VC- J scxn^*M«»»ON c» b ^n :d-' SOlTTMCPfST ?• ED . , *,^i s<xr»<AEST c« .vif $OUT><POMDA 0PN > i; SCXrrwoAci C A ED ................. !f *i socrr>*oAL« «Q CO ________ SOUT^MCPf CA BL _ 4A-*4 SCU^AO'A»^ C‘A SAA __ SOUTw^o-NTf CT BAN ... SCH/rv*AOOC A¥C EO JtV-U 5CX/TA5»OAi OA 8i 4A-U VOUTAS h OAC CA ____ . 5®,;4 SOUTATC wta OA ec >c-i' 'C-*2 sovrrAv»rAr §ivo ssp ________4&.A4 s<x/r>«v<e>w blvo . __ _ 2A-44 s<xrrwirA c' *»s jA.rj SOUTWyifvir OA A« ......... _ ;>.4 V. ••Eu^^ANUr^ >- ••« DA EA .-.V »€ ...A EA AC «-> MV SCC-AAfl iJ^ HO ST «MA«^ 4 •« «M STacx EA B l «0 at BT 57*C»CAA i STACY C:A ^A u ______ S'ACrCA IV'' ____ 5’AGeCOAC*» »A«* frr ST aocc OAC m rq 44 STagc OOa C h tah wv\t StAr.CCOACX TA S AF STan BA*OOC AVf AV STascx SM S’' STah CHSWAVE kjAv StA*«OlS>< • f A* 5^A4»ca »C».» - - STANEOBt • >•• STA a MDAOCA STAA iAOAC « jTA SOl/THviCW OA BAN _5C-4t STANPC»0 ST SC C SOt/THvrw CA Mj -X4 *3 STana Dh CT Mm4 SOUTViViCW LA CO «0-13 stanch PL m n sourHy PM la mo :b .i4 3TANI£N PO Si SOUT mwinola MSP ;o->B STANLEY AVf 9L SOu TH mOOO o» »u J4^STANLt> AVC SSP SC u TmmOCOCA «m •A .0 STANLr* C:A BL SOuthw OOOCA mB i 1A 2»STANLEY CUA 0L SPAIN PL MPL 3C- i STANLEY PO B l SPANISH Tf PP CCA • 0-«B STANLFT 5T MSP SPani SmC ap 00 30-2*STANTON OA MA SPAPPf PO BT JA. *A STANWCM la Mm SPAPPQW la no 20 *2 staples ave Mm SP4PPOW PO MO 3AOO STAPLtS ST NC ml ^P4PPC«M PQ MA 5C Jt StAPC:" SHP SPATES AVf OA 2> Ji StAACA VM SPfNCCAST Sha 50-44 STAP L> F A ‘•P«PI sr MSP JC-JB STAP la Sh P SMAAl BIVO MS «B- *3 STa A la S3P SPtAAL CT HS :a .’3 STAP la N CP SPIATT ANOB AO MO STAPOOST SLVO CP SPOON PiOOC CP 56-A2 SiAPiNOLA IP spcx ;n 8a .i OA to «S-50 STAP imQ la C CP SPOATSMANS PO CB .. 56-»C STAP imO •> W CP $pA a Gu C av C aa SPAtPvQ Ave MP SPAfNQ AVC 5«Y PA SPArPiO ClA M« 9PA«NQ la UA SPA imO i> STP SPA.NQ AO CP 9PAi*msr MS SPAlAOST lO SAAI44Q $t ^ SPPiNQ 5 SPP'HO St iPP SPA<NO ST STP SPA}>«0 ST MC MPl SPA»»iOCPce« OA DPM SPAtNOCPCCA OA NB SPAttiO mill AO OA SPAtMQ NitL AO VM SPA ipAI mill AO Arc SPAMiQ LAAt BLVO HW PA SPAiPAI LAAf AO MA 9AAMO L>«t AO MV SPAAAl LAKf AO SW PA ^•>••0 VALCO CIA BL SPAMQ VALLTT CIA GV SPAMQ VPILTY OA BL SPAlMO VACLO AO OV SPAfMO VA4.LC> "O LT7 SAAfMQBOOA L» P»B SPA imOBOOK PV EA SPA imOBAOO a Plicuf IVB SPAINOCAC3T OA UA _ SAA moPaam l* no __ SPAAlOPTfLO rr STP SAAwiOMiu. OA CP . SPAAAStOC OA MW IPAIMOS jOC OA STP S-**A»Al»Of Uk Bi , SPAiMQVPUXr OA Qv _ SPAfNQViCW la MV ___ SPAUCf OA JO ____ SPAUCI CIA SW PA______ SPAuCtCT WBL_________ SPAUCf OA AV ___________ SPAUCf la mh __________ SPAUCf PS. MPL ____ SPAUCf PL OA_________I SPAUCf PL WBL_____ SPAUCf AO MO_____ SPAUCf AO MO_____ SPAUCf ST CMS_______ SPAUCf ST nd______ SPAUCf ST LC________ SPAUCf ST MT___ SPAUCf ST L5P SPAUCf ST STP . SPAUCf ST wc___ SPAUCf TA OV ........ SPAUCf TP SW PA SPAUCrwoOO UA MB SW A AO CO SPrrQLAAS *0 X . ^ STAp* sr CO S’AAP ST lC Stapmo «0 CA TPApfv 5T STP STAAaTf BtVO E« 5TA«L!TCC«A fp STA«(.iTC OA MAS STass C a OA v»5p TASJtA LA WSP STA»f AVf AD STATf sr CHS STa »e St MS 5T4Tf sr STP STAftsTf ecl S’ATf ST fvw «¥T STA'fsrw 911. STATf PAPM AO AV STATf HW> NO MW STATf MW> NO OO ___ STAriMWYNO AB _ . _ STATf WWY NO 1 CO _ STATf MWYN0 9 CMT .... STATf MWV NO 3 PM STATf KWr NO 3 «Om _ STATf KWV NO 3 am STATf »WVT NO 3 SSP . STATf NWV NO 3 W8P .. STATf NWY NO S BL _ STATf HWf NO f BTT . . STATf KWY NO S CNN STATf KWY no S CP STATf NWY NOS LE___ STAri Fwrv NO 5 err____ STATf mwn no S MN__ STATf KWV NOS AP STATf rwW NO 5 STP S f ' Tf Kprv NO 8 VT St A Tf MWV FO S WC — . STATf FWW NO S WCT STATf HWY NO r CTT STATf MWV NO r MK STATf MWV NO f MTP STATf MWV NO r SB STATf MWV NO T SNA STATf MWV NO r SL 46 >0 5C s?*f MM-. HO .'B CT________.'B-« !-C- 3 ST A f -M¥ HO !5 mO . .___40- rtB state «m^ :i -OT *0-2*B ;a .i 1 state -m> ho 2 5 smO Af2Bf ..O ’ 2 S’A'E -MH NC :i Sh (T i3- i3f 2A.;*B -- :B-22 state mwyho :i ST ...: s-1 IS - 2A-31 state mwy ho 14 err ____4C 2-A -- 2A-21 STATf MWV HO IB OT ---------X.21A 2A-21 state 4-WV no 34 lC -2C.21A . iC-OAA state Mvrr a »o 34 mpl __1A-3B 1A 22 .B-i’fJA-JBf state MWV AO }« ltm ___-------•O-.’O . 202 B 8Tpf| MWV A«0 34 CAM . _ 1C.21S .'C 2Bf^A.)‘!1 S’ 4rf WWH AO 34 PV_________40- '• ---------2S.J’A * MWV AO 34 SWT ________AC21A MWY AO 34 NSC - .5C-21 f MWV AO 4 1 CHN__________2f-Ji --------*L->4 4 » --WV AO A 1 1 V^ ._____ -8.54 4*42 S’4 ■ f mwy 40 «T 9T ____ ^ 1A. *■ - -L; 1 5 - 4-f MWV AO «T CP_____— 30-3 10-5 ___2f 15 i * 4 rt mwv AO 4 r f p . - JA. Id -------3f^4«A s 4 i V -wv NO 4 r p^. 50-1A 1S-2 ------------:b .jj 5 'AT MWV AO At LL______. . ___20-5A ___*o-1 ?ir*Tf MWV AO «t sv . . 11 __ .4-2#sr .»i MWV AO 50 tAPi__________20-4J ___5«-;i ST4 'r A*0 50 'M______20-42 ^0-2S state MWV AO 50 LV - _:0-4f 5C-41 «CL4 t 4A.4B state MWY NO 5' PV 3C- It lOJB STATI MWV HO 5 5 fO . «c-u a C —*B state mmh n < »5 G«*N ___— -0-4 *0-4B state mwy hc M Gv____3f-2S . .. 4 0-.4 1 state mwy no 55 MS_____20-41 - — . . IC-IB state mwy 40 *5 <3M . iA-51 5A-S4 ----- 4A.J2 state mwy NO !5 MCO ^ 5A- 14 lA.It - . 5A.A1 STa TEhwyn OIS mm _3f-Aj ------ O-IB state mwy 40 5 5 NA(T_____40-40 10-41 .. 30- >C ib-^S’ATI mwy 40 5 5 PL ______. !0- It if.29 O.J1 STa ’E mwy no 55 PAf 4C-4A .. -------- B-.-B S’Atf mmy no 55 PpT ____■A.4A 5A.4f .3C-'C state mwy 40 SS PM SC-54 iC-40 - ..‘O-Jt state mwy 40 54 CTS........... 5f-2i JOJB state mwy 40 54 lON ______ SA-5# VLl state mwy 40 54 pm 50-5# SOI state mwy AO 54 SSf____.. ---------5A-44 . 3A-«2 state mwv no S4 vm? _ .lf-44 3A-42 state mwv ApOfp SJT — 30-1JB 2A-2<B --------- JA-*f state hwv ao «4 ST _____. 5f.i)B -_____20-4$state mwv nobs bn ______20-5 •0-20 state mwv AO 4S CS____3A. iC ______3A32 — .'S-DA 30 to _ 3C-tO SO-2S _____3000 ------x;-i« — *0-2 - _ lC-*4 30-41 JP 30 — 30--*f - 30228 20-/• _______lA.jr ---------IO-2B -----------------PS-TB ---------------sotr __________lA-St _ SOTO SA-42 _____ 1043 ------------- 20-A4 — VO S« SA-tO ------------ JO-14 -----------J004 ----------- 4C-AI --------------40I1A ---------------3034 -----------------’C-*0 ............... 1A-2BA . IC-0S.1OJSA ------------2i-U ----------------30-LJ _________4C4S --------------30J4 -------2004A state NWV NO 4S PA .. state MWV NO 4S MV STAH MWV nobs MPL . state MWV NO TT SL— state MWV NO rr CO state MWV NO rr pp STATf MWV NO M M^ . STATE Mprv NO B4 NB state MWV NO M AV STATf MWV NO BS SA state Mprr no tS ap state MWV NO SS BTT state MWV NO tS CO STATf MWV NO fS OT state Mprv NO tS PITT STATE MWV NO ts LA- state MWV NO»S lS „ state MWV NO Si MU state MWV nobs MTT .. > 4B.10 ---------- JO-1C __________40ti ..............*0-*2 . - -80-*t -------------- 4B-I2 --------------------SA-2B - 3f.1t . .........ton . to. It JOO.’B IA-4SS ............. 3A.2«B — 30^SAOA^i ------JO-«lA.DA^t ----------------------9f.tP :£i?: — STATf MWV NO SS NST____40. tP lAOC state MWV NO Si OPN________fC-ftf state MWV NOBS IW______ TO-tSf state MWV NO M SWT_________^SA.130 STATf MWV NO St Wf___________30-4SP ST A f 1 MWV NO Bf tPTi r __________DB>2Bf state MWV NO BB AM ____________JC- 11 state MWV nobs OL_____________4C-U state MWV NOBB OT___________3C-«SA state MWV NO BB NO____________JC.I1 state MWV NO BB fv _____________so-n state MWV NO BB SW — -__to- ISO STATf MWV NO St SWT WLlAA S^ATfMWTNOSS VM____________JC-tf STATf MWV NO Si Wfr_____SC.tlAtl . 1 STATI MWV NO f WTT _ state MWV NO 13 BAN .. state MWV NO 13 CO - - state MWV NO 13 Lt STATf MWV NO 13 Mm . STATf MWV NO 13 PA . . STATf MWV NO IS SO — state MWV NO 13 Sir . STATf MWV PlOll jC - _ state MWVPP031 SCT STpTf MWVNOtS P'T STATI MWV NO ?f MA STAT^ MWV NO 2S A<^ state MWV 440 2S mC ’ state fPPPV NO 25 W’ state MWV NO 25 STATf MWV NO 24 err _ _ 1A^ 20^ ■3 A. IB* 20004 -4001 3BOJ 20-30A 2000# . . 5f.5BX4.52 - tS-50_ _ 50-JS 3C-AJ ;D.54 2 . .'B.5B 1A-B4 - 3C-B2 if.2B --------------4B.rr ____ SO-27 JC.TS 1C-2S 30-Of }fOOf .SAff ’C.; STAriNWVPfSSF PL___ state MWV PiOfr PLT_ state MWV NO BP NST_ state MWVNOif BPV _ state MWV MO if WVT . state MWV NO Iff fC . state MWV NO AM Cfw state MWV NO 5ff Ap_ state MWV NO Iff M- - state MWV NO If 1 CMW state MWV PiO fB« CP- state MWV NO tf« PV - state MWV PiO tBi MAS. STATf MWV PlO If 1 %KI . STATI MWV l«0 5f1 Mf. . STATf MWV NO 101 OTT STATf PWPV PA) If 1 PL__ state MWV NO If 1 SO ^ STATf PPPPV NO If 1 SM«. state MWV PiO If 1 WAT state MWV PA3 ifO torn. state ipprv i«o 1 to MM state MWV NO 130 MW . state MWV NO 130 OO state MWV NO »31 CO state MWV NO '4f EG 2PUJf I*. If AA If .JA.I2 lo-ir JC-43 .BO-19 LBfMf -------sc-io --------SO-3f . 1C-4A^3 _______IWI ^ SO-l Sf-Cf .9f-lL1f-}4 --------------lA-Sf ________SOMf ________lO-lB _______3f-4A -____3fMj 20-30 3C.312D-3B ____ 5C-4J . 5C-U 49 II VrWMHY CP 5 fa ___ r.rrA^iT CT t<3 nf?A«<T OP ea rr^ANYui Shp ____T rrrAdiT pi eo_____ nrr4iiY PT f 0______ rrroPOP €0 ’ rxifp ST N¥V bt ............. TXiUA LA C>»N _ . . f^LC€A CiP MU______ T:U)€P AVf CN _____ nUXP LA AH ntLfPLA 5V ntst^iAvf STP ___ TKTOP TP N HAS _ ULtOW TP 5 HAS m*AVf MW______ riMMPLA MO niitipLA shm _____ rm$€/f LA S¥________ T1MMH TP EP - IHiMP TP UW_____ miMPTPSCPP „ HMICP CPUT OP MQ nuB€P MrtL PO UA hmscplaai op EP TIMBEPPtOGC r? nMMP pioor CT MA Timmp Pioo* DP M« TiuMP PiOGf Pt MA niAMPOLAOCCiP BL Ttia MPOLAOECT cop TTMMMIa OC CP Bt _ TTMMPOtAOC PO 5L _ TUiMPH*LLPO trr TIMMPLAAI PU STP ^ TTMUPLANOOP bpn . TTMMinXA OP WB _ riMtCPUNC PO MM TIMMPUMC spup mm TiMMPtiNe TP MM . .. riMMPSMOPC LA CO TlMMPViCPr ST SC PP TH—CPWOtP CT CO TTMBCPW OlP TP N CO ^^MMPMOtP TP S EO HMMP wOOO PO LT» TIMMT ST MH „ nMOTMV AVC NC PP THiCTHYLA C h $ TiNOOAlC Avf CO tkxia blvo NB . riOOACT HB nOOATP UM TTPPCCAHOC ST PC BM TiPPfCOPCe *T MC Hc . riPTOM ST CP TOOOCT AM ........... TOOOCT MS TOOOOP am TOGO PO sw Ap TOOC A SV TOOOtPAT MS. .. TOOOPt SPP_ _ TOOOP3 OP _ _ _!. TOtCOOAVC N TOLCOOAVI TOUOO AVf TOtMDOMVt TOUOO AVI TOUOO AVC N P8 ____ TOUOO AVC S BL ____ TOUOO AVC S SO _ TOtfilOAVC S 8L ... TOUOO OP BL - TOUOOCT SO_____ TOUOOC7 S Bt________ TOUOO CUP BL_______ TOUOO POBL ................ tom T>pjiiB BLVO MM___ TOMAMAPm Cl LL______ TOMAMAPTMOPS AP___ tomamawm la S AP ____ TCMAMAPPC TP ll _____ TOMlAMAPTM TP MCO. TOMLYNAVC sv TOMKA AVC OP_ _ _ TOMKA LA MM_ _ _ _ TOMKA T» MH_ _ _ TOMKA MAY MH_ _ TOMKA MAY MK_ _ _ TONKA BAT la TBY . . TONKA BAY HO TBT . tonka OOMMS OP mm TOMMAMA op MH_ _ TOMKAMA TP MK_ _ tommavicml*'. ok _ TOMKAMA PO OK _ TOMKAMA rp MM TOMKAMOOOCT mm_ _ TONKAMOOOOK kM ...... TOMMAMOOOLA MH____ rOMMAMOOOPO MO TOMMAMOOOKO MK____ TOMTOfTMMKA ______ TOP LA MBT___________ topki ok CO____________ TOPCLKO OV___________ c.K MV ______ tcpm : la STP _____ .. rCP*»fMLA fP .. ... ' rCPM*HQST STM _ TCPV’FM «0 CP ______ TOPC hw OOO C:P hb "” TOpC mwOOO CT SB TOPC hwo OO CP N8 TOPOMTO AvC SC TOPOnTOST STP TQTCM PO STP_____ totem TP Li_______ totem TP MM TOuKvn.LE CV _ tomepct «vb roMfPCP MCO TOMCPOK mb _ ____ TOMEPOPM sm TOMEP la CP ----------SO->f • B'.l lA- » *C :r -- . SA- I - lA.-l SA-’I •c-tr -----11^03 ----------- IB-Jf -------------7a SA -------------ja;4 -------♦c-u ------------4C-JT «B>i| 07 «Oa S UK)ia TOMfP PL TOMfPPO tomekpo tomcpst TOwEP ST TOMEP 5. TOMCP ST CP __________ PKS_________rr______ CO __________ PMf______ SB .... .... .. STP --------------TOaO ------------- -------------------7CA7 ----------------1A-J*B --------— 40-SJ ycM TKOVT BPOOM PO TPOYOP MV __ T»Oy LA •• mQ _ T*0^ LA H tpoy $t vm cm _ TPUSSCL CM ♦MjrrCHST STP ^-C pC^LA CO t\x:bcp mo *«k $ TUOOP PO M*___ TUlAMf ST M| CT ^ _ TU c /PSThwah ___ TUV jP ST MM CP TUM03TCM ST *fM KA rUPAC.P CO ____ TU pa op f 0 _____ rup«MAvf ssp _ TUPMBCPPYCIP MK .. . TUP mCP PO INO TUP mCKS CPOSJ PO OV TUPNMAM PO OK______ ruPi«^«E PO Gv _ __ .700S tC mcp ST 5E PP ’^OMCP Hf <jhts CT »M8 ▼ OMCPvifMCiK BL TOmCK v'CM PO CO _ TOMM HALL OK OKN TOMM LAHCS KO mm CK TOMM UMC PO iMO TOMNUMC PO MCO TOmnljmC PO OP TOMNDA lC op Bl _ . TOmmc TEP Bt . , . TC mmes C»P fo TOmNCSLA mm________ tommES PO EO rOMMCSPO MM TOWMLIMC Avf BL TOmml/ne AVE CP - TOMMLiNE AVi jf . „ TOMNLiMf PO EP TOmmSCDOC pom mtp TGMMShi POP MBT TOWNVICMAVC SA TOWMVICM PO MU nuCYAvE CO tka C tpo mbl TPACYltNNTfM UH TPAOIMO post TP s AC TKACCC 5T M MPl TPACrtC ST**f MPt TPA il la cop TPA iL PO MM TPA.L CAST PO BL TKA iL havem pQ TPAIL haven PO mas rpAiL P<OOf LA MH TPAJL MfST PO Bl I TKAK s CNO OK CO I TPai LIMOOO N mo TKA*LM000 S mo TK al CCOKCO TKAMSPEKKO s.p TKANS iT AVE MV TKAMSPOKT ok mm . TKAPPCT PK________ TMapppo eo TKAPMOCM ST NMK a ” TKAVtUKBTKE BK n tkavelckb tkm bpn TPA vCMSC Pt CO TKA vOiS PO CP__ , 7KATMOPC AVI mK _ TPCC ST MM TPCCLiMC OP COP _ '^PfMTOMLA CO___ tpcntomla mo __ TPCNTOMLA pi____ TPENTOMKO CO ____ tpcntom m io _ TPfTBALfOMOK BL tpioamcik CB .. TKI OAM CiP C €•___ tkioamdk s CB ___ TPIAMOLI PO f p____ TPiOA l TP MM _____ TPKJJUMC iP EP ____ TKlUAKiClP VT ____ TPILUUMCT *t _____ TPKJJUMU* CD TPHiJUMLA VT ___ TPKLJUiiTM VT TPWMPt. ML______ TPtMrrY OK PP ___ TPlBTACT SB ___ TPiSTA la SB ... _ twtom ok OV --------------SOOCA ............ . aT# -------------4^7 7C-A7 •c , JO-U :c-4 -------5B-» tB-’A -------------------jA-14 ----------JA- 14 --------jan _ -------- iC-4i ------- . 1B-^B --------- _ , *C-^ ---------------7C ;4 4C13 -------TC-J* lO-ti .. . 4B>V4 •A-a O -------------3A-.IAA ----------- 4B-1; SC*I 4B-J7 . 30-13 JA-.1 b ;i ------- 50-31 TUK nSTONC CT MV TUKQLX>Sf c :K CO__T ruAOuOiSC TP EG TUPOuO«Bi PO'mT EO 'UKT lC LAC SV tuptle la m Sv t^-kt ’LC LAMC PO Sv »OMTve LAM| PO MBT TUSCAPOAAA vC STP TUSBOC m CT CP______ TUPCOO BLVO MO ^ TUICOO PO MTP TMfLVf CAMS OP MM lA-rj 4A-72A -------------.4C-7S -------------4B-77 --------------PC-JS --------------SC-If --------------7CK) --------------ICM - 7C-M 4C-M 40 • 1 U. M ______IA.17 -------------4C-1S .. . 40^ .3COO 4COO -.1C-JO --------------------------- „ 4A-07 tmclv C CAMS CCNTEK op mm____TC-34 TMILX3HT TP IP ___ _ ^K.UTf TM CP . ________3C-* TMiNOP OPMH ~4A-0 tminlam C AVI BC . ^ 4B.I7 •min lam C blvo LC iB-M TMiNLAMI atvo E BC ._______ 4B-17 TVVNLAAiBLvC VM______________JB-70 TMinlAMCPO lC ----------------------------jb -TO TW’NLAMCTEP CP»_______________«A.ir TMiNlA mCTM lC ____________2B70 TVviMOA al AMB #C.»7 nwiNPAHM^WAV bt ,, >A.IA t>h >nmav C n mo mm ' a C-01 TVp'NMlCTEP CP . . T>4C mCDPBPN _____ _ ____JA^B r>l£P AV€ 10 “. _ 1C-11 TYVCM AVE N HO _____ tc-u »T>LEPci P Mi bn _ ..._ .. 700 7A-S TVLEPCT 60 .......................................... tc -M TYLEPPL C m _ . 4^,, T"»L€P ST aa ....... _ ___ 7ai T>tEP ST MS 40-41 4a *3 T>LCP ST Sha ............................. JA. V4 tylcpstnebn ia37as r»vCP ST ME C h , . _ r»L£PSTNf EB ______________2A »C '>iCMST nC pp ---------------------------AP.IB T^LEPSTnCMPL ___________4C-I4 4A.7B TYlfPSTMiSLP 4A.10 rri EP ST MM CP ___________________IB- 1A nrMOLClP LVT_____________________pa >4 tymolok lvt___________ pas4 T>P0L la LVT_______________________AaSA T>pol TP GW ______ SC-7S T>"0LCPCST GV__________________AC.7S Tya C nCOPS mm__________________7p ss TYPONC LA MO , 1A.1B U P A OP EM U S HW NO 0 BN USMWYNOf PIT USHMYMOi MVT US MWr NO '0 A h USMMY MO 10 BIT U t MWY MO 10 CO USMMV MO 10 U % MWV MO 1v U S MWY MO to U S NMY MO to U S MWV MO to .sc-» JO^% ------------------7C-tf -----------------4A.1C __________ja»t §-1--; IP _____ MV _______ NP _____ . 33USrSA-4t ___sai.tas ___JC-t.lA-lA _________iB.it lA.^ ----------IB-10 US HWY MO to QT 4B-1 U S MWY MO to PPM ____3ai4 U S MWY MO to Ma ___-2C-40 U S MWY MO to «rp AA VA —IC-34 U S MWY4K1 12 *P ____2C04 U S HWY MO 12 DEL -lA. I4A -------4B-41 U S MM7V MO tZ PYT 2A.t4B 70JB U 1 MWY MO 12 Gv ____2C-3J tmolmaoc M ok rm ____ TMOSCTHKO kv ______ TKOS1 TM so __________ TMOTTEP'S path ea TKOLTT mOOM C:K STM T KOUT BKOOM KO HOT __lA-Jt - 3C-»0 ... 3a30A - 30-30A 40 *7 -----SA- If ___1C- If __4C S4 - »C-44 __1B.7I , SA-Tfi U S Hprr MO tf INO US HWY MO 1} LC - US HPOr MO t| LH _ U $ MWY NO tf MM___ US HWY NO 12 OK . US MWY MO tj STP _ US MWY MO 1J WAY _ US MWY MO 12 4»B ___ US MWY NO 7 #n.T _ U Smwy NO S2 BLT_______ US MWY NO SJ BP __ J SMWY NO S7 CT3 _ ’•a 14 JC. tAA ______2A07A ______JO. 2BB .SB.22 .Sa ^ •C.24 ____2A-47A :a 7f€ tAa/B _____iB.t _____ iC-i 1 • w 4| Pfe-:To:Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator TTob: Date: Subject Jeanne A. Mabusth June 18, 1992 #1732 Joan Sweetser, 845 Old Long Lake Road Final Subdivision - Resolution <>/ \ List of Exhibits A - Resolution #3123 B Final Plat0 ^ r^xnax jrxai. C Inspection Notice 6/4/92 D - City Assessor's Report on Park Dedication Fee w ~ Sweetser Letter to Orono City Council biscussion ‘f. The applicant has fulfilled all the conditions set forth in Resolution #3123, the resolution that granted preliminary approval of the 2 lot plat. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted for Council's review and action. Staff recommends approval of the 2 lot plat. Hilltop Farm. V !' Is.eh : ; . . : /V'!’ ■ V ‘ jr .. m.#fl if"- 'T. i'siiW \. At A RBSOLDTION APPROVING TAB PLAT OF HILLTOP FARM FILE NO. 1732 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a final subdivision of a 2-lot plat by Joan F. Sweetser, (hereinafter the subdivider ); and WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all standards of the RR-IB rural residential zoning district finding that each lot is of a site and configuration that will allow its use as a single family residence to be fully developed without the need of any variances; and WHEREAS, the aubdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: #•1.Completion of all the requirements of Resolution No. 3123, the resolution that granted preliminary approval of the plat. 2.Dedication on the plat of right-of-way for a public road, shown as Old Long Lake Road. 3.w.m- Dedication to the City of the Flowage and Conservation Easement providing for limitation on the use of wetlands and drainageways described therein and shown on the plat as drainage easements. 4. -t] Pi'v-, The City Inspection staff has confirmed that the well pit and septic system on Lot 1 that served the former guest house have been appropriately abandoned. 5.Payment to the City of a park dedication fee in the amount of $8,400.00 and dedication of a bike trail along the street lot lines of Lots 1 and 2 located within a 10* drainage and utility easement. ■ "j*Page 1 of 3 tvr; mm IK' 1J i 6.Payment to the City for the legal review and filing of the plat easements and covenants in the amount of $200.00. JiV 7.Payment to the City of a final plat application fee in the amount of $175.00. HOWr TBSMSFORB, BB IT RBSOLVBO, that the City Council of the City fo.of Orono hereby approves the plat of Hilltop Farm, Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to the following conditions: Former guest house structure on Lot 1 can never be used for residential habitation as ] ot contains 2.6 acres in area. The structure shall be retained as an accessory structure for an approved accessory use. ■i.” Access to Lot 2 shall be limited to the dry contiguous corridor at the east lot line. Future owner must apply for a driveway permit from the Public Works Director at the time of an application for building permit. I# ll' 3.The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with either the Hennepin County Recorder's Office or Registrar of Titles Office on or before December 22, 1992 together with a certified original copy of this Resolution and executed copies of the easements and/or covenants noted above. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be r necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision SSfsiew. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held this 22nd day of June, 1992. iv, V 'HdTTBSTx lA'<Dorothy M. Ballin, City Clerk Barbara A. Petersen, Mayor Page 2 of 3 1 - -.t; j ’ ..'^t -- .- i'^' fci.-^1 •H- ‘.? it-.. ^s-''!0P-: ft?'STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COONTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd dmy of June# 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Ballin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. ..T Notary Public Mm i«vB0 MH-: ■ • r- '■ ■ vr:,-sfi wmm te'r-' •-'-I' . .L--iy>m- ir^ ■®fci I I •/ir ‘life.#. Page 3 of 3 i fei ft ■ G P5Si CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3123_________ A RBSOLDTION GRANTING preliminary approval of a 2-LOT PLAT LOCATED AT 845 OLD LONG LAKE ROAD PILE NO. 1732 WHBRBAS. Joan P. Sweetser 'hereinafter Jthe applicantM ^pril ll’^at^^foi lo-s? Refer to Exhibit A, (hereinafter "the property"); and VfHERBAS, after due published and “eiled notice Minnesota Statues 462.358 et. seq. ?n,Llssion held a public hearing on “ppVicition wer^ given the opportunity to speal. thereon, and VIHBRBASf at their regular meeting held on May City coun^l “nsidered the subdivision application of the applicant, noting the following findings of fact: The property is located within the RR-IB residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 2 acres or contiguous dry buildable land within each newly createo lot. The property contains a total of approximately 9 acres. 1.5 Acr6S ar6 d6signat0d wetlands. -'t i The proposed plat contains 2 lots each meeting the required 2 I«erof dry contiguous area within each lot as follows: Lot 1 Lot 2 2.6 acres dry contiguous 4,75 approximate area of d ’ contiguous 4.In an earlier subdivision review, “ o^l^y a°cclss along the east side of Lot 2. 5.Bach of the lots have been found to principal and alternate on-site sewage treatment sy P site evaluation report by Mark S. Gronberg dated 5/11/87. Page 1 of 4 k !' • f: -/i/: CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _ _ _ _ _ NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat application of Joan F. Sweetser for the property located at 845 Old Long Lake Road per survey dated April 22, 1992 by Mark S. Gronberg of Coffin & Gronberg, Inc., subject to the following conditions: 1. Access to Lot 2 shall be limited to the wide dry contiguous corridor at the east lot line. Applicant must apply for a driveway permit from the Public Works Director at the time of application for building permit. 2. Former guest house structure on Lot 1 can never be used for residential habitation as lot only contains 2.6 acres of area. Structure shall be retained for accessory use only. 3. Prior to final plat approval the well pit and septic system that served the former guest house must be appropriately abandoned and inspected by the City inspection staff. FINAL PLAT SUBMITTALS The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month: 1.RECORD PLAT drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1"=200'. Drawing to include: A. Lot lines platted per preliminary survey. B. Designation of drainage easements over designated wetlands within Lot 2 and to confirm location of wetlands at specified elevations. C. Dedication of 33' of right-of-way for Old ig Lake Road. D. Dedication of drainage and utility easements 10' wide along all perimeter property lines and 5' each side of internal property lines except omit at designated wetland areas. E, Naming of plat. Page of 4 L-i- ■ I E;W ¥ te MA Itr. i^«- iQ. M); stiSSSof, CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.3123 2. LEGAL DOCDMENTS required: A.Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. B.The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. C.Signed and executed Flowage & Conservation Easement over the designated wetland (refer to sample enclosed). Legal description can be written as follows: Shown as drainage easements on t plat plat name Hennepin County, Minnesota. 3. FEES TO BE PAID: Total Due $375.00*r TVf {‘fC i u A I f Ulc V 4 c r'cz T ~’C A. Final plat fee = $175.00 f r » ya -‘v.'*-.vv'vvv B, Legal review and filing fees = $200.00 CHECK va rr*j nt u 77^ /V 375,0i YOU *C. Park Dedication I«k. wua r coot The Park Commission shall review the 2-*lot subdivision to determine if portions of the land will be suitable for acquisition by City for park or trail use. If the City has no interest in acquiring lands, the City will ask for a cash payment In lieu of land. At that point the property will be referred to the City Assessor to determine the value of the undeveloped land. The Park Dedication Fee would be based on the value of 8% of the undeveloped land. Please contact John Gerhardson (473-7357) for information pertaining to the scheduling of your application before the Park Commission. Park Fees must be paid at the time of the filing of the final plat. Applicant is hereby advised that preliminary subdivision approval shall expire in one year from the date of Council’s approval of the preliminary plat (May 26, 1993). Page 3 of 4 !<r; V ■ -i ^-. •r®?:. ••• ••r'‘iI t: f »'«t i>’• Z* • I<v ' i>‘. (?•* u .••.Pi CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE Cl TY COUNCIL NO. 3123_________ ■iTi' . •k‘\ '' •■ \ Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota ac a regular meeting held this 26th of May, 1992. ■ I ’“V" ■' "yin. XZaL££>l^ allin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor t STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) M':- f'- The foregoing instrunu nt was acknowledged before ire on this 26th day of May, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said Instrument was executed on behalf of the City. r',»0 ,T .iVi notaiw ^SSuc - XSNesoTA ^°"hENNE?1N COiyJY My cpnvn»8rt>fl Mtw Page 4 of 4 ; ’ >■ - r ■y > i.. . K V I. . %. ':\v A-• II-rI ifif if,.. RESOLUTION *3123 -. ,^. m-W - •. •*;•m' t s . h*' & '•r" i: ^U' K -■jv. t iT - m: %: - V fH-.-mP- P- ;■^r- i:i-y^m- [-*•--V;.-. '-'yi'-i-.w ?r;?/ : > - !;¥■ Kt,'- ■M' f/i •' 6|. i v f r;-j'*;. -- >. ■- ;’v ? 11 RES.uUT^ON -312? STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO I Dx. thy M. Hallin, City Clerk of the City of Orono . Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby c'.ertify that have compared the for}lng copy of a resolution of vhe City Council of the City of Orono with the original record of such resolution in the Minutes of the proceedings of said City Council at a eting ' f said City Council hel'* on May 26 , ' > 92 , and that the same is a tru<- and correct copy of said resolution was duly adopted by said City Council at said meeting. 27th (SEAL) -r-jn ■ SI I-I ■•■i L. ;'■■• ’•)-■ IV k'v: I .i'^; X - • ;.f. i-\ . HILLTOP FARM E> «v» :ksk >« •m 9^ mMimmd - L------------1 u______ 5€im %m^m^t^90d9dp^mrn9f<^^ t9rwm\ ftaMI mMMmm^rnm^ rnfit^gmigna^ kf im% ■fldlt&f tdktrwitm f iitf'aM «#• w T 0--* • • - A _ ► DATE HME OTYOFORONO INSPECTION NOTICE PERMIT NO. ADDRESS OWNER _ OLUO IN scheduled COMPLETED ■4 La/^ CONTR. ■ \(yr^ 'Jchn^x^^ TELEPHONE NO. •n % Ui k. 5 Q - '^■^; ijs' -<~^'' ■ -. o> A Ui 5 ■» * - •-jr ” •»» V.”.. •-. .' •" L «*J Sa: Mi 4. 0: Q DESCRIPTION 01 FOOTING 02 FRAMING 03 INSULATION 04 WALL BD. OSRNAL 07 DEMO-SITE 07 DEMO—FINAL 09 PLUMBING HI 10 PLUMBING RNAL II MECHANICAL Rl 11 MF CHANICAL final 24/25 WOOOBUPNtR/FIREPLACE 12 WATER HOOK UP 13 METER SET/TURN ON *4 SEWER HOOK-UP 27 SEPTIC MAINT. 15 SERT1C install 23 SEPTIC FINAL 16 WELL TEST RJMP 18 EXCAV/G.4AOING/RLUNG 19 LAKESHORE/WETLANOS 341^ REMOVAL f=;T5iTEi^P€cno?lA 06 PROGRESS 21 COMPLAINT 22 FOLLOVIMJP OWHEIW:ONTRACTOB TO MEET YOU; YES _2ffib COMMENTS: 'i^riLL j>n Cfl'-^a7rJf:r>?A Att/^ ^L^ShlnCu^^ Ct O k « s orr /*--A> - ir \ V.• - f y- Uis Ct . a C- ^ . P* r*- ^ . Y* »•- •*- • ':■•''ZC' 'VrX^c v:w V'-. a Ui QC Ui § □ WORKSATISfACTORY. PROCEED □ CORRECT WORK A PROCEED □ CORRECT WORK, CALL FOR RONSPECTION BEFORE COVERING □ CORRECT UNSAFE CONOfnONWTTHIN____ INSPECTOR WILL RETURN / PROJECT OOMPLETT; Q ISSUE CEKHPICATE OF OCCUPANCY ______TEMPORARY ______PERMANENT HOURS. □ STOP ORDER POSTm CAUL INSPECTOR □ inspection REQUIREO. CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. C PHOTO TAKEN C CTTATION 'SSUEO t- -Cali for the next Inspection 24 hours in advance. 473-7357 * -. .V. Whit* Co^yAmp^ctor^ Fil«Canary Copy/Sit# Hatkcm , -.r 9* :^S 4A.P N»* F»r- M ;tvi , A.* ' - i 'fm n m 6.%<?5Tos Proa: Date: Subject Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Memb^^Mayor Peterson and City Council ^^on Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator ' June 8, 1992 #1739 Albin J. Nelson, 500 Oxford Road - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing 9 Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.03, Subd. 19 - Applicant proposes land alterations in excess of 100 cubic yards. The alterations involve the removal of tiered retaining walls and the replacement with fill at 2.5 to 1 slopes. List of Exhibits A - Gustafson Report dated 6/5/92 B - Application C - Plat Map D - Property Owners List E - Topographic Survey Description of Request The applicant proposes the removal of tiered retaining walls within the street yard. The retaining walls were installed at the time of the installation of the pool and patio area and are now in a serious state of disrepair. The purprse of the application is to install fill at elevations that can be planted with ground cover that will not require regular maintenance. Fill to be placed in the ^reas where there are several mature trees shall be protected with 50 leal ft. 3-*4' high retaining wall to be placed at the base of the northern portion of the fill area. Refer to your topographic plan. Exhibit E. The City Engineer's office has completed the review of this conditional use permit application. Please refer to Shawn Gustafson's report of June 5th, Exhibit A. The report notes the following issues to be addressed by applicant: 1. 2. Existing timber retaining walls should be removed and disposed at an approved disposal site. Ground cover at 2.5 to 1 slopes must be of vegetation that will not require maintenance. a type of tri, V. 3.Granular material and drain tile to be installed behind 3-4' high retention wall to minimize hydrostatic pressure at the base of the wall. »'V .! r ‘p. K • t Zoning File #1739 June 8, 1992 Page 2 4.S10P.S :“r \uTuiLi:ti\v ^z%lt surfac^^ruTo^ff to the sides and minimize amounts of runoff flowing over wall. 5.Wall should be constructed of a modular block system such as "Keystone." ■K Options of Action To deny current proposal or P-' Approve subject to conditions set forth in the City Engineer's review memo or 0'P ■tm to, -i- Additional Comments and Planning Commission Recommendation June 17, 1992 % Ki. s’ The Planning Commission advised the applicant IwUcdt aLed®thit ’'he"brarLte^^^ ti rkly%^\L"flocL‘‘‘lt\lf wo7?d"^^^^^ a”y;f that «r»rsicontractor review the type of material to be used xn ?hS r“^nL4“a” prior tHnstalla^ The enclosed approval resolution ha» included this as a condition of approval. -i. . i‘K. mM- i^ms . r-v >i'4 v «i>I: - tort.>'■ |^!jf:>‘;'‘vv A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODB SECTION 10.03r SUBDIVISION 19 PILE #1739 WHEREAS, Albin J. Nelson, (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 500 Oxford Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as Lot 7, Block 1, Stielows Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit to permit the filling of over 100 cubic yards at 2.5 to 1 slopes to the west side of an existing pool that involves the removal of tiered retaining walls and the insta 1 laton of 50 lineal feet of a 4’ high retaining wall along the base of the fill area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1739. The property is located in the LR-IA Lakeshore Single Family Residential Zoning District requiring 2 acres in area. The property consists of 2+ acres. 3.On June 15, 1992, the Orono Planning Commission review d the application as proposed and recommended approval based on the following findings: a.The existing tiered retention wall is in a serious state of disrepair and endangers existing improvements located in the adjacent higher elevations. b.The proposed land alterations are located in the central portion of the property and will have no impact on adjacent residences. Page 1 of 4 r*',. V::'' tT: r L . ll^V. ?x-’ &■■■ % • [;.%■■■ tt f - V-^'- S:- t^*-‘ i-H • •■ , . ’• ■- vV V- •■’' .'-if- .V., . > 1 :j»" • ^t?S:P'- F ■i-'P" . : s i'ASi"^•y; c.Proposed improvements will have no negative inpact on the historic drainage patterns of the neighborhood. 4.The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the proposed land alteration and installation of a 4' high retaining wall will not be be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 3 .The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the affect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the community. CONCLOSIOHS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section ir 03, Subdivision 19 to permit land alteration improvements as shown on topographic detail by Mark S. Gronberg of Coffin and Gronberg, Inc. dated May 19, 1992, subject to the following conditions: 1.The timbers from the retaining walls to be removed shall be disposed at an approved disposal site. 2.Final elevations at 2.5 to 1 slopes must be restored with groundcover of a type of vegetation that will not require maintenance. 3.Granular material and drain tile to be installed behind 3 — 4' retention wall at base of fill site to minimize hydrostatic pressure at the base of the wall. 4.Slopes should be graded to allow a small drainage swale running along the top of the wall. Such swale would divert surface runoff to the sides and minimize amounts of runoff flowing over wall. ... Page 2 of 4 'V ^ f&i ■ I ’.jv “W- [i#m- 5.Type of material to be used in the construction of retention wall must be approved by the City Engineer. 6.Authorities granted by this resolution run w: th the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a land alteration permit within one year of the date of Council approval or the authority granted in this resolution will expire on that date (June 22, 1993). 7.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 8.The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of hiraselt, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 22nd day of June, 1992. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Albin J. Nelson Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd day of June, 1992, by Barbara A, Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 4 ir si- if--. H' r r: M I'- n- f-il.i t*; • ^:,f ^:4 fS" >g- 6p:’i Ika;''. :(ii- I' C& 1 - fVNmu --is ■■ '■V-. 'j/jfcT*'^' V*'■ ^ >. f:vmfc' ; f •m' - '.r *■ tl>%rtil,'- \W- P-- Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Ore* G X' 9oyfr>e ’ :ci^T^ C ^ a P- ®c’^4ftr t Q.e''r> ft Cy* T^crrKdS £ Nevr^^ Pcc«<^ G Sc’^ur<»^ ?£ M •<' C ^ •Sr^or Ciy'^-'^>'*T Engineers & Architects : A wr*c-.* ‘"£ Gc 'Oor Scoe ’'; ® c>s.*y. ^ r 5 A *^v:i^ **£ r*-.^ O Loviic<a PE C Puvie^ ^ A P£ T lt»i>rr'.arri *'£ it p-fHd Pf s Anoenor* ^ CVrr\^<? C Burgjrrai Pf T'-’or\i^ £ A'xjuV P£ Gj ''» * P»'ji'x^e* PE V'Ar* PE \*tr^ p ?E Av.-e*. *** ^ ^ * C P '•‘cr^jv A *V?e X' P£ • r-s. :.' 9 V^ anc Pf >r"V C5 PE P A'XJe'VV' Pt » 9c«\ P£ Mart * >o PE Gary \A P£ Dar’iei > Ec^pnon PE P*' C . C3IA^‘ P? Ma t D Aa-s.P£ S' ^ 3 .e^s^ P£ i p* c G t P£ KJT'^ - 'A<pr>:^ PS «• 'CCC PE <a-r^ J >apa PE S'-a.v- D G<.ua^w^ p£ C ‘C 0!r^'i^r P E CPanr^ A erctson l *0 Kt Paw^yry Hanan m Ovon ja*-nrs p E^vjpp'affX June 5, 1992 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: A. James Neison Conditional Use Permit Appl. #1739 Our File No. 139-1739 Dear Jeanne: We have: reviewed the application and topogiaphic detail plan submitted ''or a conditional use permit on the A. James Nelson property in Lot 7, Block 1, Stielows Addit.on. There are several significant engineering issues related to the constructability of the imp.ovements. The existing timber retaining wall should be removed and disposed of at an 'droved disposal site. The proposed 2.5 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) slopes are constr jctable, out will be very difficult to maintain or mow. The slope should bt wStored with vegetation or other ground cover hat will minimize erosion and will require little maintenance. The proposed 3 to 4 foot tall wall is necessary to protect several of the large trees in the area. The **"' •1 is proposed to be constructed with the same 2.5 to 1 slopes above it, while i.tilizing the existing clayey and loamy soils in the area. We recommend that the proposed wall be engineered so that the stability and drainage concerns are addressed. At the very minimum, granular material and drain tile should be instaUed behind the waU to minimize the hydrostatic pressure at the base of the wall. The slopes should be graded to aiir^v- a small drainage swale running along the top of the wall. The swale would divert the surface runoff to the sides and minimize the amounts of runoff flowing over the wall. We recommend the wall be constructed with a modular block system such as Keystone. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions. Yours ve truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. IyfkU*^ vl Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. SDG:U 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 r 1 if. '■ f*^ CITY OP ORONO - GStJERAL LAND USE APPLICATION t I PROPERTY LOCATION site Address ^CC A c a> Q i O' Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 0 f ^ 'j I Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name U. Address ^ On On P.h Phone (home) V7J 3 77 _Phone (work) 3^0? ^G ^^1 City 0 << c' ^0 _____Zip G OffNBR (if different than applicant) Name (aS Phone 'home) Phone Address City Zip S^.r, iq'i'TDate ^operty Acquired _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. (month/year) m fees - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - _ _ _ $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application _ _ _ _ $125.00 Residential accessory Use _________ $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) ______ $150 00 Guest House, Guest Apartments _ _ _ _ $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration .-rr. ■'l rr.nkin U M I f i.*l CMUlfU 1. »‘CCTrc t aitriMUip. u» / I - I 't I1 ni rr*j vA,*j Mwa w*i.iTr>^rr\' r\ i. I I i. Vi/) .VI .* r r * o *r«. */vri #t t urufts $ ijU y •’.* -* *"• * ’ r*» f L*n f Tn*M • •/ V' nvA I Vw*/ . Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more , Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule Renewal Fee - $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 r'. iw.- |i% Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $300.CO Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule ' V.'. •kfl. r ’PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY ,Present Zv-sning District — Present Use of Property _ _ O _ _ _ Residential Other (specify)__ DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail:^ £ rnc'-J r ■-f~cu IQ I O S' ' /c\ roo ncl s uj I >>> I k’.«i n ^ f ^ ------4- ; / >-------Hi::------- s>oy»c h ; //» ^ hc’r^^ ifCL'r U’i H __u REQUIRED SUBMITTALS Center 348-3271). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). , .^ Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X !?• OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. ______________________ __ _ __ __ AM* mm mm mm mm 4^m mm mm mm mm Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Jitll_ _ _ _ _ _ __ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE . . The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff tSe not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred In review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of Mls/^er knowledge. DateApplicant's signature OWNERS SIGNATURE / . , .The owner hereby acknowledgeg/and agrees to this application and furth^er reasonable entr? onto the property by City staff, consultants, agent;8f commission members# and Council members for pu p Investigation and verification of/^hia request. . 'iCrJ^—' __Date iX. __--------------- Date ^ ♦■ft ♦•hft offices 26 cApplicant must have all submittals into the City offices »5 days before the Planning Commission Meeting, planning Commission Meetings are held on the JSi?treVl)!;,“s%rfhe"?;L";in*/?^?s"slr“aS^ unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ^ ‘ - -t. ► . \ *- I ^ i.. 9f ,Li —1 -T - _Ty TT~ :•{ 1 r 1 »*> ■ r VfU’ y I n ^• 4/ lyf < >t» ®nftcws tiV mu > *•** •*’> i sa?«g mm . V- ‘•■v T »'^^» v-v-v^/ i"' tt'^ t'l : ■ •*» ^ ii&c^ i. X p;; ■ K'J^’ S'*''- MBM-y M ^ 1 & i 2 ♦r. X TV 1 ' (I7j \ (lai 1 ,^\ n ;<o I IQ} f M) T 1/ • r*g^ Vy* '•'KLS^ #»4) KIE t«w.«Uii f i •▼T TT IT ,, x> <? ADDH (IV 5?»«-»• M <a*»ri #*« n v t >• ^ # CUT (FOX ,», ST) rv-9f f’\ 5fl •' ;j^-. %«. {i) %' Vi [>D . ^ tn)w)r ^^,- p- p f I I » ' »• ' ; X ' 0■ \> -iP^ t V- *<*•••> . _ TT'.;. ^ ♦4,^S'-S£»^ - * * *^ A- 4 -•/• • .* *r *. . ^ . ♦ ^ - *. .,-X' ■• >--■ .— . Tt "w-«_ «• . .. " . . M siagB^ • 'w • •-'V **;■'>•■• * '-¥■■ ■? it-v *^' * ’ ■' ■S'^ '■'' '^1 ■J-- I.« . • -♦«r ‘ ; - - - - U. — r -■*• * H)% $ • • *4 tTr]; •--; •* r I ‘ ;> v-' * -I'. •' • ,.• « . , <r >•' •• - - • ifr -• -•.%-. •>. . ■*r* A — >‘.r .:/ ■-_; * t ofei&t o o i# Itefe vJ $• - V I X O §j4 fw «, T: To: Froa: Date: Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusthr Building S Zoning Administrator June 8, 1992 Subject: #1740 Steven M. Harris - 3850 Watertown Road - Renewal Conditional Use Permit/Public Hearing % i&v •* W .. m- ,' io ^ Vv r ,>■;> ■ fc'f ilsSf' pi ■ ill' ‘ ‘ 'v " i.'5" . ■• V' ^'Ch Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.03, Subd. 19 - Conditional use permit required for alterations involving land alterations in excess of 100 cubic yards. Applicant proposes excavation of a pond 100' in diameter at 4' depth. Original conditional use permit approved May 8, 1989. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Applicant's Original Addendum Submitted with Application #1367 C - Property Owners List D - Certificate of Mailing E - Plat Hap P - Original Staff Memo for Application #1367 G - Survey H - Grading Plan I - Planning Commission Minutes and Council Minutes Preview of Application #1367 J - Glenn Cook Report 4/12/89 K - Resolution #2629 Eevlew of Current Application Applicant proposes no changes from the original conditional use Dermit that would seek permission to install a 100' diameter pond at a 4* depth located approximately 100' from the closest lot line. The pond is not located within a designated wetland. The purpose of the pond is both decorative and functional. The pond is not designed to encourage a wildlife habitat. The main purpose is to provide additional retention area for surface runoff and ground water buildup. The banks that are to be installed are 3 to 1 slope to encourage the return of vegetation and fencing is to be installed adjacent to pond area to prevent horses from Interfering with principal function of pond. Staff recommends approval based on the findings and conditions set forth in Resolution #2629, Exhibit K. A . ? • -W" -^t Wp>... I*;.Pffj. ■■ &k-'-p' Zoning Pile #1740 June 17r 1992 Page 2 \o vVAdditional Consents and Planning Commission Recommendation I-'' h:- .- '^4- ' : The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the renewal conditional use permit for Steven Harris. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of Resolution #2629 that granted original conditional use permit approval. ' :r r . A RBSOLOTION GRANTING A COHDTIONAL USB PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 FILE #1740 WBERBAS, Steven M. Harris (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of property at 3850 Watertown Road located within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as Lot 1, Bloclc 1, Hillaway Farm, Hennepin County, Minnesota, (hereinafter "property"), and MHBRBAS, per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a Conditional Use Permit to permit the installation of a pond 100* in diameter and 4' deep. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS if- & ■t ^ ' .••• . ^ i 1. 2. 3. ir If# f®'!. - This renewal application was reviewed as Zoning Pile #1740. The property is located in the RR-IA, Rural Residential Zoning District requiring 5 acres in area. The property consists of lO-*- acres. On June 15, 1992, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the application as proposed and recommended approval based on the following findings: A. B. C. mm The City Engineer has confirmed that the installation of the pond will have no negative impact upon the drainage to the west nor the south. The installation of the pond will have a positive impact on the drainage in the area providing greater retention within the limited watershed. The application as proposed will require no variances to the standards of Section 10.03, Subdivision 19. Page 1 of 5 ■m. ’T., ■■ ■f k>- :'5, I- F ff. eS 4.V- , X AAC City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the installation of a pond as proposed will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the affect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the community. COHCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of' the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 to permit the installation of a 100' diameter pond at a 4' depth as shown on the survey by Coffin and Gronberg, Inc. dated March 17, 1989, subject to the following conditions: 1.Banks of the pond are to be installed at a 3:1 slope to facilitate the regrowth of vegetation. 2.Vegetation to be restored upon completion of the final land alteration. 3.Applicant to provide a drainage easement over the retention pond and upon the final recommendation of the City Engineer, hereby agrees to grant the City additional drainage easements over existing underground tiles that drain to the southern boundaries of the property. 4. wW' ppllcant to apply for a land alteration permit from the ity prior to any land alterations. The City shall arrange for the necessary inspections of the improvement project by the City Engineer. A C Page 2 of 5 m JitL •“•4 *4pvv>,<v- ' 5.Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the owner, but are permissive only and must be completed within one year of the date of Council approval or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (June 22, 1993). 6. pfe- wJ ' H. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7. I; . The undersigned owner has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. fe-, Wf . ^r 1992. ATTEST* Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 22nd day of June, Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor »■ ;.Ft fe' Steven M. Harris Property Owner(s) fgr ir i '--/ ’ •'Ifc' mi:' l&<. - ■ te®.# Page 3 of 5 y l.t'ifii. fp'v SS' 01 ^ if v' STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS. ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd day of June, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson 6 Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor p< t City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. my^ Itr;' |r Notary Public J'-i Mi;;? ^ WM: ■ W' '■■■■■ ■-> Page 4 of 5 rmy ,>:• .W_V 1 v: 4 4 •i 3i < CITiOP ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION ^^3^0 g~<~ACT S>ji TO cSite Address Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) A Please attach legal description to application if not included APPLICANT Name Phone (home) Phone (worlc) lo Address \>*i«:v:Vcv\o'o^r^'^cC..Citv Cd\rc>t^o Sip *^3^36^ OffNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone Address Citv Zip Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. pm V t- <I mm s-M' -IS/ ^ ^ ■ fi'Vtew •fr- clli’s; m:.- Wd- - ' ^ te- -,vte fees COHDITIOHAL OSB PERMITS - _ _ _ _ $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application _ _ _ _ $125.00 Residential accessory Use _ _ _ _ $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) _ _ _ _ $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg CP _ _ _ _ $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration 7*I L. f/V*) M RLCURT-iPjaa: rsi,, Sj42Si;0 0)01 ,1“ / '••7/C Vk.'/ / I IV'i Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more ^ Grading, seawall# retaining walls within 75* of lakeshore pS-m'- PRD/PID - see fee schedule li: Renewal Fee - $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee ^”*^^$^0^00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) imm ■ Sc- 'V ■ $250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule ; 1- X.. .5L. /a i;-PRBSBNT USB OP PROPERTYPresent Zoning District %' . Present Use cf Property _ _ _ Residential Other (specify)_ DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST - . ' Describe request in retail: ^ ^ ~ ‘ ^ ^ r\ Vf*>o _ _ _ _N ^ - c. - g. A^> — - .1»I I ■ I \ \ r.;-- i* 2. required submittals cSSifie^^^^oV^rty°”ow^ List of owners within 350' (you can obtai this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Governmen Center 348-3271). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). . . - , j Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 3. 4. 5. b. 7. TOO ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (11* X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. L. 4^ :• r'‘. 4: I'K The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. P^®^se rememl^r that your application is not complete it the above information has not been included. _ _ Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date- - - - -- - - - - i" ’tr fete il'fe I."' AFPLICAHT*S SI6HAT0RB The applicant hereby agrees to provide all requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (start not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurre in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the ^est qfjjis/her )cnowledge. Applicant's signature __Date OMMQDtS 8XC91AYORB ^ j ^The owner hereby acknowlf:dges and agrees to this application and furtMr authorised reasonable entry onto the property by C^ty staff, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date - - - .T ' m Applicant must have all sutoittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are ^ unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building 4 zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. (f;/- fV ■c •' •I •H-«M V* — t-«•*«t W tt - J ' rr\ r^ , li • r^s -w'o o a. V MAR - 5 Qgg 0'*J^‘ O VO v» <•• *!»^\ '>'' ^ G cc. WCi.'^«»- . "\ N^«- ^c> mmm m *r-5i--. iV ■■ rjJy^ . ;#■ ?>S--if>- . J - f -• ■ k y 1ft *- ^.•>s ► ^ t- ✓; '■ ^‘U- i -1 * 'fe-' »■;■ ■ >J : \rfyr^'* ♦•*^5. VpVy^ . w<_ Vn r- 5^-V V.O :,v.^v:-a -V ^C5 rO ■y'^A'K •V^¥k •-J •■ • '•; • ^WxIH-} ■ S^n 7 V ‘ ^f•^ ; -^n» - S«%o -— ■ "^ ‘ ' t. • ^ ■.>'i ri , ^•}-k;. »:' • • • • I*I ^ ^ ^ ^ r- o 3C X tin ^ K i So K 2 ca i/> in w 2^ CD —4 CD OO -D in m 3 in mo* w X IC o > • ’* i"', t ' r-. •' 4‘ It. ■'r- 0' •• » 30 00 3 «4 > ^ tO O nj —5x^55 *39l||A, 3isS5“S* > ui 39 S X 99 W 3B O 99 S Sae •- 39 a l/l M W </* l/f 39 t/» o ^ ® o u# Qvn o HO ^ u» o1/* o IP o^ vn fc-I**-' life. kI. ' pjt .-• iv - '>> • ;■■ ■ P *©>■ -r IS '.a S -^‘ 1^. i.'* A T^. ■i-:- ’’j- *'f' 'i j'^' ■''.•■•■* K#' *o n ’*2=Nl: ••225 2i|: Ills= e;|2 i-' 1*2C B*? v» C/N r-\55* fiS C c i;i 8 0 1 su -t sS *1 f> 8 8 • • •• 9 9 #a •o c ii|i ^Hx81-1* IIP i-li = c23 clS?n p 9 \ - o s w 3 3 m e’ in CJ ift iO S:o^ V r? y 29 ^ ^ ^ 9 9 lO 9 P r- to JO 9 «* ^ Ml *i 9 5 ^ f T ^Hllr* 5 ^ ^ ® *8 |s8B§ VI* VI* M* M ^ r* ^ Wi r- f- 2 *• o o 2 o 9 O O O a?m c. c* o ^ issSSS fO it 9 tfl Mt8^^ r ?;;io»x::S 9 9 9 F 9 sS^isS45*pp»S^ 5 1- 9 O y» lit r» ^ p* 9 o M092^09 “UliC* 5|’t„i •» _ 3 ® *5S|i= ^ 2 _ ^ 1^ V*i O o -4 r* f* ** o p# i^ii f- o O 1* O PI Z Z 9 9 9 P# m 9 9 • " "• 9 5 s!IIs5 5 9 ^ ^ 9 w X 2 9 P4 o -4 1 9 9 P* fp <^^99 Z “4 o o -8S8 O 9 9 9 O 9 X 9 O V* 9 9 O 9 9 i* Q 9 2 D 9 O O O 8^SSS8 -9 Qi o n ^ m i» p o 9 x8-* - ►2^252M » » ► 5 • >288;^^ 5S--2*"► ►OK* 999909 p O -4 O 9 ^ O ^ I* O 2;i2»sA Z X • f- 9 _ _ ^ 9 O 9 -4 O • 5s??5=r* m Pi 9 M O O F- O 9 9 O 9 «S88?" a2 = s- r* ^ -i -4 9 * ^ s '•SS'"- 9 9 9 O ^4 9 ^ P P 9 V% *1^ 9 V/! o S ^ ^ o p« fp 9 9 088 PI 9 0^09 O 92 ^ S EP •« 9 9 9 9 0 9 0 I- 5 X r- 9 PI 9^99 '®5«5 i vS M »« * S 82 ««"s <«A 9 9 I p* 9 o O IP 9§ ii 9 9 AlS.VkaWX A VCERTIPICATB OP MAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OP HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO ) ss. ffW- I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1740, was mailed to the attacned list of property owners . In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 1st day of June, 1992. a S-.- - tel#. tsSSffef:' mm ‘ .4. : ■ Vi; .K-. • |lfC« ■ .i-s .)twm%. Y % I i 'm ■M i-? I V . i "P ■f 'M • » I - i .AIl.'^S "■■ ;n :cr r. -r *• iy. ■'i- CITY OF ORONO NOTICE «vi^in, S^e following land use applications: 1. *1739 Albin J. °^.^°Jtera'tionJ'Tnvol^A®^^^ the^”emoval^of ~f,i^rnrwa?r. llTXLr^^clT. of^00 cubic yards adjacent to an existing swinnning pool. iut/p%'ar.J:^rrs v.\r within his residential property. - V na<-Tia'ff of 1115 Brown Road South# seek 3. #1741 Rodney J. and Shanon hed garage measuring 24'x22' aooroval of variances for a that would allow themitring a side setback variance and a ;«iance^that^^_^^ ^ detached structure to be installed in principal structure. J * T«-?nrr nf 500 Otono OTchard Road# seek approval of4. #1742 James and Amy Laing ^ a proposed family room anc street setback and rear yard variances .o- a p p garage addition. 5. #1744 Donald Helgager of ^^65 Sixth Av^nue^Nort^^^ lo^c^a\ed^within the setback variance for a from a natural environment 150’ required setback area for all strucrures .l 6. #1745 David R. Carlson cC “i®"^0-7l<*and^ 7^5^^^^^^ sltback*a?« aitback and hardcover variances within 1 cabin. Proposed for remodeling and a deck existing on-site sewage treatment improvements will require review of existing o Applicant has alsc facility and conformance to 3^ seasonal code seeking approval of for containment of a gray water. ;ji Knc?..'i’“as orsn“ review by appointment. City of Orono Ry* Planning Commission • :-i y/• -Jeann^A. Mabusth Building & Zoning Administrator <•>-.• ■ . <• • • * • ■ ' w to be published the week of June 1# 1992. !- ^1 Mayor Crabok ( Orono Council Mttab«rB Planning Commisaion Chairman K«ll«y Orono Planning CommisBion Mfsabors City Adainiatrator Bornhardson J««nn» A. Mabuath, Building ( Zoning Administrator April 11, 1989 •1367 Staven Harris, 3850 Watertown Aoad - Conditional Us« Permit - Public Hsaring Portlnant Ordlaancm - 10.03, Subdivision 19 - A conditional uss psrait is rsquirad for ths altsration of land in sxcsss of 100 cubic yards. Applicant pruposss sxcavation of a pond 100' in diem«tsr at a d«pth of 4'. List of exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Applicant's Addsndua Exhibit C - Proparty Ownars List ' - Plat Hap ! - Planning Commission Minutas of 2/21/89 * Lot Survay I ~ Topographic Survay Exhibit ExMbit Exhibit Exhibit Bmviaif of Applicstlon - J proposes the installation of a 100' diamatar -ond at s closast lot lina Tha tha located within a daslgnatad wat'and. Tha purposa of tha pond •• ^ functional. It is no\. plannad for tha ancoursgsxsnt ®*^"**^* A***.^^*^ *• of application would suggest. Applicant's addandum (Exhibit B) sdvisas that tha main purposa of tha pond is to rid tna ad^scant soils of tha high moisture content found in tha low araa of tha fiald. Banka will be installed at a 3il slope to encourage tha return o Vegetation. Applicant proposes the fencing of the pond to prevent any by horses interference with the desired functioning of the pond. Ir 9 0 • • a • # 1 0 V • *.7o •* 1 •• . - - 'g a ' o % f •0 * r . * W . • . • V-:^ rj,'» -“* ' '. 'v,“ - • •; ':\ : '^' /' * / ■ r r - • . . Zoning Pil«; 11367 April 11, 1989 Page 2 of 2 Staff has worked with the City Cngir4eer to ensure there will be no negative impact on the adjacent property nor to the subject property. Cook has confirmed that the pond installation will have no negative isipact upon the drainage to the west and would only have a positive impact on the drainage in the area providing greater retention within the bowl area. Early in the review the neighboring property owner to the west noted concern that he would receive additional drainage, but Cook confirmed that there would only be greater retention on the Harris property. Staff has learned that one property owner is concerned because of ♦•he geeSe and ducks maintained on their property and that the pond on the Harris property will become an attractive nuisance. This is a matter that can best be resolved by neighbors. The City cannot deny an applicant's request based on concerns of this nature. The applicant has clearly satisfied the standards of Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 and seeks no variances to the standards. If Planning Commission consin^.rs approval, staff would recommend that a condition of the approval be that the banks of the pond be installed at 3:1 slopes and that vegetation be restored upon completion of the final land alteration. .1^ •'WV tV ■'" . t \*'\ i ♦ j;\ ;i&4 ■'>1 .- >.5S ■Vi’ .r*' • •.. . _2-1*.LV W><3fiw^><i» <Ai>.^-V:-ift-- '♦Vi?:**-«r>-ri./^^ •.* \¥^.v7 Zoning Pile 11367 Additional O I'ay 3, 1989 nta and Planning rnit iiolon Re lodation * Neighbors of the Harris property (Mr. Taylor to the Ljunediatc west and Mr. P Mrs. Butterfield to the imxiujdlatc south) appeared before the Planning Commission to voice their concern, toth Mr. Taylor and Mr. Butterfield advised that there were old farm drainage tiles installed within the field that eventually drained under Watertown Road through the Butterfield property then finally to the Luce Line. Unfortunately, no one was able to locate the placement of the existing underground tile system. The applicant has advised that if indeed in the prococs of installing the pond, the underground tile system is discovered, he would agree to incorporate the existing drainage system with the final design and functioning of the pond. Staff would suggest that if the underground tile system ia discovered by Mr. that the City staff be called immediately to give appropriate direction. Based on the City Engineer’s original comments that noted the minimal size of the watershed and that pond will increase retention. Staff did not feel it was necessary to acquire a drainage casement over the pond area. The Planning Comisaion disagreed in consideration of the information from the neighbors concerning the underground tile system and recommended that a drainage casement be taken over the pond and that if underground tiles were discovered during construction# that the City Engineer make a recommendation regarding an appropriate drainage easement loe taken from the pond to Watertown Road. Mr. Harris agreed to these condlt'^ona. Mrs, Butterfield also voiced concern with the fact that a pond would now be located 50* from their property line. Staff would note that tne proposed pond location will be approxisiately from the road right-of-way with an additional 66* of right- of-way providing 200*> of separation before the Butterfield property line on the south side of Watercown Road. Please note your ordinances have no setback requirements for ponds. Remesiber the prime purpose of this pond is to provide a means to alleviate the moisture content within the soils of the low area of the Harris property. The secondary purpose is a decorative pond. The pond will not be designed to attract wildlife. The applicant plana to fence off the pond even to his own horses. The Planning Conuiiisaion adopted the approval recosimendation subject to the applicant providing a drainage casement over the pond and depending upon the location of the underground tiles In relation to the location of the pond, that the appropriate drainage easement to the southern boundary be provided by applicant. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission*e approval recoi«unendation• X. W m m * if fe|5K,"T: ms^mr'BS'- MM MM.''"' ., Si®®&.. mi « > S 1 •i ’,‘s ■•.j 9 1 •■i . /'-' ( ' 4. ■uc-ili r f"; V Ifm:::- w-'v'h- i<‘f?V"' *i'UJ*j ,•'<?/ 0. L >^/ •■ I* ^I O 09 1. ^ I r nil r /III ^ / U!/ A^l / /»> / / /? / / i I !•■■ ...»<Anji.Vv a. t «-r H '• l: ■ { •. V* . • *■ , - ,••.*- ■ •'. .», ,^*'■■'. ',- -- ■ ■• : . ■ \- • ■■*.':•. ^ -V '■ K17UTU or TBX puuniXBC coioasszoa KBrmc April 17, 19S9 sonsc rzu iiikhiatzata coowref clob Thar* war* no furthar coamanta frva th* public ragardin? this aattar and th* public haarlng wao cloaad. Xt waa Bovad Ly Chalraan K*llay« aacondad hy Planning CoBBlaalonar Cohan, tc tabl* thin itaa until th* approprlat* grading plana ar* aubaittad along with th* plan* for th* rataotlon pond. Planning CoaBlaa.i.onar Johnaon Indlcatad that ainco thia Mttar had cob* bat'ora th* Planning CoBBlaalon thraa tiaaa, ha did not wiah to aaa it again. Ha fait that th.« Wayxata Country Club ahould particlpat# in thia aattar. Motion, Ayaa-5, Johnaon, Nay, Motion pasaad I13«7 STBVn BAUI18 3880 MATBinOini ROAD OOaOZTZOMAL 06B PRRNIT COIKliniATXOM or PUBLIC HBARIBG 8il0 P.M. TO 8t28 P.M. Mr. Uarrla waa praaant for thia aattar. Zoning Adalnlatrator Mabuath axplainad that Mr. Barr la waa aaaklng a Conditional Uaa Paralt to Inatall a pond 100' In diaaatar and 4' daap. Th* pond could ba claaalflad aa a dacoratlva pond with a aacondary purpoaa of providing dralnaga of Bolatura contnat of soil* aurrounding th* pond araa. Mr. Barria propoaaa putting a fane* around th* pond to pravant hi* horaaa txou Intarfaring with th* function of th* pond. 8* intanda to iaaadlataly aaad th* banka. Th* pond will not changa th* i*m I* F.1*1*1 <•] I • a 4 . ^ . .. i # -V • ’ - H\-* ' '* ■________ _ _ I S::- ^ 3 P-g':-- ■ .s fer - I wm I |ey.:;., ' ;■ 'Mi-*' •^’ * -’"i^..■rt-tv * *^ ' >• *n* ^ MORmS or TBB riAKHIVC C0MM1S81OM MEBTIWC APRIL 17, Dat soazao nui |13«7 ■umxs<comiium . Planning CoaalsRlon«r Brown atkod Mr. Barrla If hla aaln HarJla tmplLma thRt*whlo^r^9Vdiy\r^*a"t«Vhra Va^ln*pJl*orl!j’ Ho qaoatlonod wbotnor clooolng tho drolntilo would allow It Vo tho dralntilo If ho oncountoro it whllo putting in tho pond. Buttorflold aaid tb«t Mr. Barria'a pond would COM within 5&* of tholr proporty lino. Sho aaid that what would bo an attractlvo addition for Mr. Harria but would bo on unottractivo nulsanco for hor. 4.K4 “® furthor coaaonts from tho public rogarding thin Battor and tho public hoaring woo cloaod. ^ ■uggoatod that tho flowago and conaorvatlon oaaoaont bo •• <lr«intilo runa on tho applicanta proporty if *K 5 ®*®.i**^ ^•^•*^"^*’*<** Johnaon aoondod hla notion to includo that condition, Cohon aocondad. Motion, Ayoa*(, Haya^O, Motion •ii75 DAVID PUCB 2fl4 CASCO roiMT ROAD ’IMUATZM OF POBUC IIIABTDC Silt T .M. TO 8i30 F.M. Hr. Price waa proaent for thla aattar. Planning and Zoning Adainiatrator Caffron aaid that the appilcanta wore originally aeeking an average lakoahore aetbacjc variance aa well aa a variance to alightly incroaao hardcover. The applicants have aince reviaed their propoaal ao Chat the proposed addition would remain the aame, but tho patio area would be Jacruaoed. Thla would result in a decrease in h.rdcov.r 1. tn, 75-2»- .on. to 37.J4.. An.th.r .. •! eTi vU jr/;sf- OH ‘ may 8, 1»89 tomtm FILM fll35-BAHimK: COMTIUUZO cx®<llt sacuiring th# conplation of t.ho projoct. Concorn had baao axprasaad ragardlr.g tha typo of fill bolng usod by the Bannlnga and Barnhardaon suggaatad that laaua be addrassed if an axtauaion la approvad. Mrs. Bannl::tg provldad a brief history of tha projact and axplalnad tha problaaa Involvad with obtaining claan fill. She aald It la difficult to obtain tha quantity of dirt they raquirod all at ona tlaa and thay did not want it delivarod piocaaaal. 8ha said that aha wantad an axtansion to Saptambar 1, 1989 to coBplata tha baro. waa Bovad by Mayt- Hrabok, secondad by Councilaonbar to axtand tha c«^n<lltlonal use parmit for the Hannings to Saptaabar 1, 1989, subjact to tha staff's conditions for approval. Motion, Ayaa*5, Nays*0, Motion passed. •1281 408 AMD SABDT RAOSCHBmXUUTBS 3895 IWfMUT.nni DKIVB oumoa «2828 Mr. Kauschandorfar waa present for this aattar. 8o*iotant riannlng and Zoning Adalnlatrator Gaffron ••ploloo8 that tha Rauschandorfar'a ware raquaating a slight ravtslon to tha conditions conceptually approvad. Thay are raquaating that raaoval of tha sidewalk to tha laka occur at tha tina tha foundation work occurs. If approved, tha Resolution would ba revised to reflect that the sidewalk be ^•■ovad prior to tha footing Inspection being dona. Gaffron that It Bay ba nacaasary to raise tha low area between the house and tha roadway to direct drainage away froa tha house. QMttron further Bantlonad that due to tha house being raised 4* the Rauschandorfera' intend to OBit the baaaaent access and put in a first-story walkway and stairway. waa Bovad by Mayor Grabek, secondad by Councllaember Bottles, to adopt Resolution 12626, approving the variances as ••t forth therein with the slight revision as requested by applicants. Motion, Ayes«S, Nays*0, Motion passed. •1387 mVXM BARBI8 38S0 MMUTOMM ROAD CORDZTIOIIAI. 08B PBRMIT MRSOUmOM 82829 Mr. Harris was present for this matter City Adalnlstrator bernhardson explained that Mr. Harris was •asking a conditional use permit to construct a decorative pend In a pasture area. Mr. Harris intends to construct a fence to keep his horses out of the area. The Resolution addresses certain reguiresients for the applicant should he encounter drain tile while constructing hiu pond. I- . *4.^] ■fM;J4 f 4^ L!l>4^^Uk^Cat - ^ *j^• »-*r -•♦S, * • ';i*T —'*J^Boinestroo ^ r< Rosene.. Anderllk & Associates , .... ^ V ; '4i ft. "** ** * "^.’■'i'-. Lr *w.i> ft • “.'^w**-»*». -i'-'-'h-.is- 1#^ • . ^ April 12, i9af city of Orono Bos 6f Cryatal Bay, MM 93323,$■•.• 4,. ^ Act® I !!•• J®snn# llAbueth .1*1 fllo Bo. lit.1367 ■•rrla r-. «ST!q,^ **2^^**” JiJSIiir •«« •* ”*®fro® o^roBiaatolf lo acroe. * * provldo vator ttoraga for ^ • *111 oot ChMgO th« drolMM Bottom, tr *K • '/ ollwoB. "wicoo. Vo vould rocn—md that tho___________ “ JL?’*' m 1 < ▼ 00-*. B***tloBo, ploaoo cootoct thl. offico. ^.v! '■'•J\i •* ♦ a , * -BMnM, .ionu, BiOBtLXK i ASBocuna. nc. ~J. ^4CL^/€cj( - - -♦ i*.A ■ ‘O . --or*. . %. .t * r •■ c >*•'- «. i • ‘ ^ V/^ *W5^5*.rfe«- i»i rii h:M si/'"**’ •' V vK r #. • ^ ^b8« rfi o ^ -- aC r'---------t ^ 00-->• • ;Vi ' ir*f- ■ /T • :, ■ ^o V. •sits .... ..:>^*.;,i.J«-<«2d2^4r^ y ■ ■^1*' - /i- . A ' ] 1; % -/ a __ • ^ V V’';.! ■; - -11____.>• -A — —•«. ^ «- ^ -t*-»— m I"pt , r iV ^ ■; f:N.' -/ .t .-. ■. ■ y, . ■ •v i-h' i.^'.-". ;--4- • . *^1 ■i f.iy 4i V t/'. ^ p: v;P b ►iM- f- K>:-^ m>-;-! X • *<».' ’**' :**. A - . Hi j t. CITV City of ORONO OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2629 A KSSOLOTXOV CBA>miC A COHDITIOHAL USB PBSMZT PSR MmZCXPAL S0HZV6 COOB SBCnOH 10.03* SDBDIVlSZOa 19 PILB 91367 County* Hlnnosotn (horolnafter "proporty"); and Suhdii*4«<II?*i\**?i Municipal Zoning Coda Sactlon 10.03, poSd*10o"Vn dl“*^t“**''^d”‘*°^ tS%i?Sit*thi°lnlta^AVtlJn°or^pond 100* In diaaator and 4* deap. ■OB* TB Orono, Minnaaota:tSPOU* BB IT KBSOLVBD by tha City Council of PIBDIBCS 1. This application was revlewad as Zoning Pile #1367 Planning Conniaaion *PPlAcation aa propoaad and racoutandad approval bisad on tha following findings! n* 5*’ ha?.“Si7aVatAVlnpi^upon tha drainaga to tha wast nor to tha aouth. Pago 1 of 4 • ■■• - ■ • -fifj . — . • '.'1 .2- . 1 ■ ■ : • *^~- ■» cr ■\0 '%■ r'' i:i^ •^1 "Oi j •V ■',-jv;':'- A‘ #?• '■$ ;,-* '*x| v»''5c.-V'«< »4_* * - ' \ i'Kfe mi^'i KS ■■-; ^ E®-">1: ■> .t51 •'*. -S'v fe 4 ■ CITV City of ORONO OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITV COUNCIL NO. 2629 “f J*p “*»* «io„V V. W. S‘f.“iss “i«V„-cci". CONCLDSIONS, ORDER AMD COMDITIONS City Council hereby%ranta*^a°!eonHf^i findings, the Orono Jonln, CoV, sVctiln l5 03 "” N“nlclP*l in.Mll.tion ir. 10^ coV^^ “ '’•’•*1‘ **•the survey by Coffin an,4 at a 4 depth as shown on .»b3.« trthe%?lViV,"co„“dU?cV.1 ”• ”»’• *" l"»t»ned dt • 3.1 .lop. to cacxixtate the regrowth of vegetation. ^ «“<>'•<' "P°b coopletlon Of th. fin.l l.nd .ains to the southern boundaries of the property. ^iop«\y°oir;?th’U”'r‘‘ ,*’/ ■■•■“Idtlob run .1th th. r.“r Thfifni’'.*!?!;}? tr. Page 2 of 4 .*~Pf . ■■*. ■.'>}.• »tI«i •I.TJT IWBal rjUDES Si-:L25£^3L-^*V, * ■» ^ _ « • ■ 1 '-0 tI y t ft--; it';'- I' ■\-- ti' ■ Sli, #•■■■ ,*: h: .' ■a; • , :r;’^ ■: 4.- rVi:fevV -><;'. 'V '%'■•*■•■-« ■> ,. V • ^.'v's y 'yr /?. ’> !, -• ■■ ■! ......' '*|i<-.II# &v- ■> if.w:.;.. W' mIP.. ■ :s^ ■ m-r ' • ! ; ‘'"U * • ■ " :P%;. 0m. k\ • • TO: FROH: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator June A, 1992 SUBJECT: Final Payment Improvements on County Road 15 Street and Lighting Attachments: Hennepin County Invoices #20436 $103,996.65 Right of Way Acquisition - Final #20435 $4,3^7.35 Street Light Costs - Final #20434 $63,^43.95 Street Imp Costs - Final The invoices attached are the City of Orono share of the final costs for our joint project with Hennepin County for the County Road 15 improvement and street lighting project. The project construction was completed in 1989 and the right of way acquisition was completed in August 1990. The City has applied for additional M.S.A. funding for the street improvement and right of way acquisition costs in the amount of $165,253.00. The additional request was approved by Council at the May 26, 1992 meeting. In 1989 the Ci»,y applied for $200,000 in M.S.A. funding. The $167,240.60 amount due the County for right of way ($103,996.65) and street improvement ($63,243.95) costs will be paid $100,000.00 from the current request for M.S.A. funds and $67,240.60 of M.S.A. funds currently on hand in the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund (P.I.R.) Road and Bridge Account. (The Road and Bridge Account was established in 1987 through a transfer of accumulated unused monies in the M.S.A. Construction Fund, including $65,253.00 of bonds sold in 1979 but not charged to an M.S.A. project by the State. Thus the May 26, 1992 request for the $165,253.00 of M.S.A. monies includes the $65,253.00 which will be an accounting entry for the State in order to balance our account.) The additional amount for the street lighting portion of $4,347.25 will be covered by P.I.R. General Account monies. The City did levy assessments for most of the street lighting project which when collected with interest should compensate for the additional costs. Requested Council Action: Approval of payment of City of Orono share of final costs for joint project with Hennepin County for the County Road 15 street right of way costs in the amount of $103,996.65, street lighting cost of $4,347.35, and street improvement costs of $63,243.95; and appropriating $67,240.60 from the P.I.R. Road and Bridge Account and $4,347.25 from the P.I.R. General Account. ■K '■* • i "5 V.nr ,Vv.-V I fl HENNEPIN BUREAU OF PUBLIC SERVICE 320 Washington Av. South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468 r:—*f r PHONE: (612)930-2500 FAX: (612)930-2513 TDD: (612)930-2696 -,.nI’J,’ u \ilS MAY 1992 April 29. 1992 .ii:.I"-' m- mr ^ • rt-v City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystol Bay, Minnesota 55523 Attention: R. Moorsc. Administrator m According to our records, we have not received a payment on the following Involce(s): (a copy of which Is attached) -C;' Invoice Invoice Date Invoice Amount ;V 20434 20435 March 13, 1992 March 13, 1992 $63,243.95 $4,347.35 i|lf 4 iStfr"'" m Please send us your payment at this time. Make the check payable to the A Hennepin County Treasurer. If payments have been made, please contact me at the above adoress.i Veryjtrul^^wrs, fe:'A n.lce Harkhan Financial Management and Accounting lip- A4pmp..Attachments ills- ^ A ♦ • ^ HENNEPIN COUNTY on equal opportunity employer . - - . ■ r . a'•-r • • *n •. ;/ ^ < a...' >. SvAi*. ' 11 ^ 4- I w c. V-/. o ^ ^ > >• *•♦••* "1*” _ ^ ^ •% ^ m * * • •• •:^^r'^v,^V,^.■ \ t'.' • - ■ HENNEPIN COUNTY .;.. V-I bureau of public service 320 WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTH HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 553-13 • *.• • .V.-v': BILLED TO: 5f V.^- -* • City of Orona DATE P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MM 55323 ^ «^—— • - ^- ♦ •* p.-M^nr^g- Administrator 1^^ * • - 'i — * . . 'A -' » L* •• « <• _ - - • ■ DATE DESCRIPTION r • -iTr. •’■ • , rS. », - 5 ”4*^.: Jt "J* - • C- ; • ' <f .• '*• --t* .•.* ‘ /c.*— - i. *. * **% • . T' A.i* '■«.. i- Citv of Orooo’s participadon In Agreer^ntjta. PW, ^u: 74-CS-87, County Project 6CZ4 on CSAH Is Contractor: Hardrives ^c^ »,• V..‘ , r i - V AT* — - .-i T . «r Contract Arxjurit: $4,373,112.03 (Final) Contract Construction i - Plus 175 of $208,850 55^for -,v;^ v /: 35^504^59^^5^ PI S^145^of^337,794.05 ; fojr^englneer 1 ng *- . ' •' <9Q7 440 ; lots I •* - • - • • * r . .._ _ .-v,r »-.• -n- • • * • • • - 'iT. • .. ‘ ' .* •*: • •• . *,?v^^sr z. <4! ■ - ^ ... •• ' •” •‘Ti*. *-t r * *i'. — • • • a# i* • i* h.A -*:•*. V .“T ^1 •••^ “V. .. I .* •• * •.1 . k. •. . W »••..♦»• % '.••= V-. - : r 2" r I ;• •• • • • I - » ^ :-Uis previous-I^olce •' 13215 - 05/04/88 s- -: •■/■:. 7 13221. •'05/12/88 -^7- ' ’■ 13228 -‘06/09/88 * . - ‘ 13243 - 07/18/88" ; 13267 - 08/18/88 A. ^ - —" —V * Subtotal Previous Invoices and Paid Final Amount Due .T- -Vp”UT ^ ' r»K : ?;.24.310.7L^^^^ no O^V t~A~:T!bRr ^r^"S5 ■ 39.aS7.14U^5&:^>^ .:39.8srnfei^£ 39 ,85T. 14 -,* .'.« .' vTL '■ .... '"■--V.'V ► * . • ^u-’ ••* .*’. 4.^ . •**■>''*.■ , •. *^ * ^ ^wL -if’.v -• : ^ «_,w, _. •. •». ■J- ■ fer-ile-rTt-V^. •r- .-^v 14 >Vj3 • t V V '. •' j . [^63.%i3.95 ?'5Ka&ti4SaKr: - « -’k ••-V, *.• •• *. -* *V ■*. *■ - - - -. » .• “KiSSht Coumr Bui«« of Piiblle a ■^>•320 W*rf»in«tonA¥*n»i«Soum .,;'yr- ;-r^' Hopfcint; Mlnn«o»5S343 ^-- vAllce Markhaa Cr- «4-»* ^4-^ *r. A. ;„* AKtntion: ■r% m V K4-rr* 3f HiAAVf P Aov — A» o«-» ^ . • A .*; V- . p»%fv — trrAj A ur:c G^^-O — icCOOKT*NG HENNEPIN COUNTY BUREAU OF PUBLIC SERVICE • 320 WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTH HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 BILLED TO; CItV of Orono • . *P.O. Box 66 DATE March 13 •• • Crystal Bay, HN 55323 Attn: R«Hoorse, Adpinlstrator :}^opp\ •- - .7 * 'T-,- • •• ‘-i r: s- . N :. *7.-> •'' • ■••* i> ^ * • * f City oif Orono's participation In \r Agr^nt No, FW 74-03-87, Coun^sy Project 8C^4 ,on CS/M 15 1 Contaractor: _Hardr1.ves . Inc._^ . _ Contract Anount: $4,878,122.03 (Final) A,*. . v;' -V V. - ‘ 1' • f . *f ^ — -City's share of Supplementai AgreOTcnt No. Cofttract Consthjctloh':;^ : ' Plus 8S of $109,155.82 for .: ' . '"o 7-52 47 .■•:; contract administration ' -..- .. , -1 -v.‘r :“• ‘ *' •• a r-* r’» • •• contract administration . ------ • •' - . V: •. tir«v1ous Invoice No, 13261 11 - J - : ".-: *1--^^"\e«TrSvioi« Invoice; No? 13261 £;. dated 06/28/88 - I/ ^ % ^;V •■• ^ ^ ’ • ■ Final Amount Due ___ f . . I r .*■. r --.Tl.’' S113.540.94 ^r^X^Siv _ . _ ______ •^* *r. •. . r Vt—**’■ Vr-'' ‘ -I - -» A -r >- : * •I** 4. * * ' *. r , ••• i * *•■*• • • •• • • - i;; ' « '.T t Vj** • •»•■-■• » ^<FV* • *' • • 1* F. I> "C. : • . ••* ii|4,347.3S: . , . • r,« *.••.•s—*. ^ . • • , -.; ... ■r5r-ar-i ’>r’ ' -.•.. *. • • ‘‘’j ■ Vi^'V-*^ vv • • v> 1^- f»*' -i^ ». ■' II'tei'-'-' HENNEPIN BUREAU OF PUBLIC SERVICE 320 Washington Av. South Hopkins, Minnesota 5o343-8468 PHONE: (612)930-2500 FAX: (612)930-2513 (612) 930-2696TDD: CTfCr C^iO Vn rdtlEIIQ^:^' p'. -.^L ' i-, ■ may 1 1992 April 29. 1992 ■ - ■ * -•'wW'mm--' city of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Attention: R. Moorse, Administrator m According tc our records, we hove not received a payment on the following Involce(s): A llPw-m "M A" s - (a copy 4 '• ' ■ •t Invoice 20436 Invoice Date March 13, 1992 Invoice Amount $103,996.65 i" ■''§ %■ A''■ 'ffr ‘,v /0!' :3 ■I S th r?t '1C. ■f Please send us your payment at this time. Make the check payable to the Hennepin County Treasurer. If payments have been made, please contact me at the above address. i-Vf;.: I-m 'm -r.f Very ikruly yours, Alice Markham g ;% Financial Management and Accounting I i I*’' ■ '"■■"'Is#' 3 ;®i Attachments HENNEPIN COUNTY on equal opportunity employer .... _ _ • . • •• • '.1 hC S002 17. 331 “r- •• 4' ■ BILLED TO: • .* -i2 * *HENNEPIN COUNTY, v.;.-’ BUREAU OF PUBLIC SERVICE 320 WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTH HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 .# • . to ^ * * city of Orono ^ • - . . date . ; -------------------------- ■ — • • - . •* - -• P.O. Box 6G - .. • • . ’■ . •• • * * ^ • • • : Crystal Bay,m 55323 ■ • ^ • Attn: R.' Mcorse. Administrator . - .:... . -INvOiCc ,NU. - • »-v/^ . - *• •. •. *n.*"■-'“ • »-v#^ - *• • r • x^*"•-' ■ ‘ ": ■^.*:'if>~x-l-'‘ *• ^.-f X'-/• ■‘'•'V^.' '•'■■ r' -j •J 7. .-><1 ; ■“, > “if ■ j ♦-• , r .V ' “ I . .. -, '.-r - ■ f • . . r . • • C- N**. AMOUNT • » y. ‘v — . . - •V..'** *> . -\’< ^ to' • “ IT** .-■ '"v-f • •r^’vT."^ « • -4^: '-. V-rl ."r,?- ^ .. i . to -K*. . , • - - . •V- V * • '.to V . ;».V- • • r . - .. ^ ,-to. ^to* ... • -■ ■'"-........................................ City of Orono's participation In Joi^eoent Ko. 74-08-87, County Project 6024 on CSmtI Ip _...:. .w.^..:,.*=-.n-: ...Final, right of ^ay .acquisition tests., throu^ August 29, i950 " * “ '$207,993.30 .. to f r- . — - %to ♦ ‘ .• j. -(. -:. *- ism ■ • ■ >, r.?v ' • I ?T:^;. ■«• l>c» 7iSaSS #• A: Lj ___________nCBuiitc It^^^to wwpWrCaiMWv BU( 3aO W**in«to« Av«i_, — r“A11ce Ma^ ?r^-. ’U'f.r _______ _________ ’»r 55: I'-ir t vv%5*i wv V.- V. • t - /■ ♦ ••* •«to totov^v^a « •« « , « ' ....^. V - ;. A.^.: •-•. • r / ^.* _•. > V ----------^ .- ..: • • ----------- nr>f ry ^ .-Mp E ■ is. it: ll#t • ■SI:?#:-' ii/.' iiS?-P-fc tefcte/ VKi‘:? iitef: igS.&:- M"wm p-l"^ ?jS'w ■ ^i. ;i' rv”!->-v- .. liiS-i»m iiahv WS;tif .¥ ^ TO: FROM: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator June 6, 1992 SUBJECT: L.M.C.D. Proposed 1993 Budget DATE: ^Oy , 9 Attachments: A. B Memo From LMCD Treasurer Scott Carlson Summarizing the Proposed Budget Proposed 1993 LMCD Budget This memo is to provide a summary of the proposed 1993 LMCD budget and to highlight significant changes in the budget to assist the Council in its review of the budget. The LMC^ planning to adopt he budget at its June 24th meeting. I. GENERAL BUDGET A. Expenditures 1.) The two major expenditure changes are $15rCH0n for the addition of a part time technician and $27,500 for consultant services related to management plan implementation studies. The part time technician is a new position. A job description is attached to the budget. Although consulting services expenditures are down significantly from 1 992 the 1993 expenditures do not have a special funding source as did those in past years. The 1991 and 1992 consulting services were funded by the DNR as part of the Shot^land Regulation adoption process. The 1993 consulting services are for the Lake Management Plan and do not have a special funding source. B. Revenues 1.) The major source of revenue has been shifted from the cities to licenses and permits. Also the 1993 budget includes $15,732 allocated from the reserve fund. A reserve fund allocation has not been used in prior years. ip:. HW, ? ••^4 V^v-itjP^’-' II. te V. W'4r . •m te." &^-* • ii?' Isi# ■■'^ ^:.>-r' >T‘ "'r'* feld*'S»,. r.'f sSf fn. "■■ •.-:r. Rr-®!'' M mm^mt';V V.-' pi*: 'ifS-'i fcsi;i^iik: ,,X- EURASIAN WATER MILFOIL PROGRAM A. Expenditures. Expenditures are down $89,300 due to the elimination of barge service. B.Revenues 1.) City contributions are the major source of revenue for the EWM Program. Financial support from other agencies has been reduced by $170,000. The significant reduction in revenues has been offset by the reduction in expenditures and by an allocation of $35,000 from the reserve fund. III. SUMMARY.Although the total LMCD expenditures are reduced significantly from the 1992 budget, revenues have been reduced even more. This has caused the proposed allocation of $50,000 from the reserve fund to finance the budget ($15,000 in the general budget and $35,000 in the EWM budget). m. . V. ‘,i* ■ <*., mm w- >> iii \ >-A i j :*f rV > ptiu. ! IrPf;. 'Vi 3ft' V" ' w^-- V. Mt m SS‘. P'i SI# at'v,^- ij4l?|f''.fm- .* I ■ r^':-.'j- - ‘ ^ iff"- *a LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTR JfeV 4 May 29,1992 JUN TO*LMCD Member Municipalities FROM*Treasurer Scott Carlson SUBJECT:Preliminary Discussion Draft 1993 Proposed LMCD Budget • 3 Th» LHCD Board reviewed the preliminary discussion draft of X993 LMCD proposed budget. In keeping with the practice initiated In 1991, the 14 LMCD member municipalities are Invited to review this preliminary discussion draft and offer their comments prior to the LMCD Board's adoption at its June 24 meeting. It should be further pointed out that cities ssy also comment on the budget after its June adoption and certilication to the member municipalities as provided in LHCD'S enabling legislation, excerpt attached. i faw points concerning the proposed budget are important in your reviewI 1.p^y^nue projections — as a result of increases in new 2>0v^nue generated from user fee schedules, the 1993 budget reflects a 44% decrease in administrative levy requirements, with the milfoil revenue staying the same. Individual line items are called to your attention* af ’ I-'- Line 4, revenue from license and permit fees is Increased as a result of the new fee schedule. This reflects the Management Plan policy to provide greater revenues from benefiting lake users. ii- -b. f-“/A-'' ir :f-lV iMk* T' ii^K - ¥->• •■. ■ IfSFsS.-.:,..ym'W0g^:y':-. Line 2, reserve fund allocation from uncommitted resyrves supplements a portion of revenue needs. Line 6b, milfoil contributions, presently reflects no other public agency support. The board is pressing its concern for lock of funds from the dnr and Hennepin County. Explorations are taking place with county officials to redevelop needed support. 2. Disbursements reflecting new obligations are* >V Line 2, Personnel Services, Management Plan _ Implementation, Part Time Technician, proposes staff ••distance in implementing Management Plan objectives. An attached outline details the responsibilities anticipated for this position. ■i fW.-kl' ■*v >t •• i.'A* ■'■- ■ '■ ' •'' m t-M'^V ■1^4. ••.■»*i'»3.:y-<*- vv r <•'' .._.J*..,j^-Vx_.. Transmittal Letter* 1993 LMCD Preliminary Budget Draft, P. 2 b.Line 30* Management Plan Implementation Studies* proposes consulting assistance on a range of Manage ment plan implementation objectives. An attached outline details anticipated objective tasks. c.Line 31* School District Boater Education Program* calls for establishing boating education in each of the lake school districtu for youth and adults by the fall of 1993. d.Line 33* Contingency/Miscellaneous* is removed to reflect the District's intention to drav upon its reserve fund for any contingency needs. Lines 35-42 outline the 1993 Milfoil weed harvest program which is reduced from the 1992 budget. It should be pointed out that the 1992 budget has also been revised downward for this year from $250* 000 to $131* 000 as a result of the decision to eliminate the more costly barge service. The barge elimination also reflects lighter weed volume experienced in the 1991 due to higher water levels* this same lighter volume projected for 1992. Corresponding reductions in 1992 revenue of $131* 000 have also been projected. Comments on the Preliminary Discussion Draft of the 1993 proposed budget are requested prior to the Board's regular June 24 seetlng. Thank you for your consideration and response prior to the June adoption and certification to the cities. •‘T '1. % * ■ i».r i*'-' ' A # , *. ■4 ; '• ... ii If • V- *» f.■r /> •A. -»¥«■ . TV^.- t *>?• -4. ’ w. ,r 'I ’A :t ‘ »' *‘^1. j''■f.w' LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Preliainary Dlscuaslon Dralt, 1993 Propoaed Budget May 28, 1992 REVENUE A. LMCD Connunltiea Admn Levy Raaarve Fund Allocation Court Flnea Llcanaao & Peralta Intereat, public funda Shoreland Rulea, DNR Agreement Shoreland Rulea, DNR Adran/Cona. Sub-Total, Adalniatration d V Wh'f' V. ■:-> EV Hilfoil Program: a City Contrlbutlona Other Public Agenclea Private Solicitation Reaerve Fund Allocation Zntereet, public funds Sub-Total, Hilfoil b c d e -1 . .1 r >• TOTAL REVENUE 1991 1991 1992 1993 Budget Actual Budget Budget 103,825 103,825 107,230 60,000 -0--0--0-15,732 35,000 54,851 38,000 45,000 65,000 101,515 85,000 145,000 8, 000 13,930 8, 000 7, 000 45,000 20,000 20,000 -0- IS.000 10.000 10.000 -0- 271, 825 304,121 268,230 272,732 63,000 63,000 63,000 63,000 102, 000 30,000 170,000 -0- 85,000 36,331 17,000 37,000 -0--0--0-35,000 -0--0--0-5. 700 250,000 129,331 250,000 140,700 521,825 433,452 518,230 413,432 w> ■li' DISBURSEHENTS ADHXHISTRATION: ^ K > jparaonnel Servlcea: 1 2 Mm ' Salarlea Mgt Plan lapl./Pt.Time Tec. Employer Benefit Contr. 100,500 -0- 14.800 102,183 -0- 17.486 104,500 -0- 17.000 105, 700 15.000 18.000 iii.;* TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 115,300 119,669 121,500 138,700 '‘%r KiV'Jf.'i Mmr- (1) Technical aervlce asaietant for management plan Implementation. Contractual Servlcea: liv:mr- H 5 Office Leaae 6 Utllltlea, Janitorial 7 Recorder, Temp Secy, Audit 9, 600 1, 500 6. 575 a TOTAL CONTRACT SERVICES 17,675 Office & Adnlnlatratlve: * 9 Office, General Supplies Telephone Postage Printing, Publ., Legal Notice Haintenance, Office Equip Stabeoriptions, Membershlpa Znaurance, Bonds Hileage, Expenses, Training 14 V^rv.^'v ■- a'|'m;i'16 V. 3, 075 1, 475 2, 280 2, 000 3, 400 210 5, 050 2. 360 _ TOTAL OFFZCE & ADMN.19,850 10,026 10, 130 10,482 -0--0--0- 5. 110 5. 550 5. 550 15,136 15,660 16,032 4,051 3, 500 4, 000 1, 579 2, 350 1,600 3, 622 4, 000 4, 000 2, 387 4, 500 3, 000 2, 242 1,700 2, 000 75 200 200 5, 579 5, 200 6, 000 2. 029 2. 300 2. 500 21, 564 23,750 23,300 (1) 1 I A A w^'n r r.> *‘^A PBOPOSED 1993 LHCD BUDGET, P. 2 V; Capital Outlay: 10 Furnltura, Equip. I 19 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY Lagal Sarvices ^ 21 Proaaeutlon 22 Preeaaa Service TOTAL LEGAL ■ •. J, (2) Reduction Irom *1991 Actual" COHSULTZHB SERTZCES/STUDIES: 24 Ohoreland Rulea Consultant fhoraland Rulea, City Grants Lake Uae Denalty Study Wetland Inventory Hepping Public Inforaatlon Public Access Studies Hgt Plan Implementation Studies W?5v TOTAL COHSULTIKG/STUDIES - ^ TOTAL AOMIMISTRATIONm If*__jk:y/bisceujukous jf^||t^'«pprox. 3* of Ado Budgot TOTAL AOHHo* COMTIHBEMCY iiSri^an Water Hilioil (EWH) fc illid Harvesting Program Barge Service Trucking Personnel Admn, Ins, UC/WC Ins, PICA, Opn, Supplies, Fund Raising Contract Services Contingency (at approx. 5J()li V “'I./' 4'® 42 ,j-'1 ^ ' TOTAL EWM DISBURSEMENTS TOTAL AOHM., EWM DISBURSEMENT 1991 Budget 1991 Actual 1992 Budget 1993 Budget 3. 000 3. 789 2. 000 5. 000 3, 000 3, 789 2,000 5,000 20p 000 20,000 500 28,453 24,944 120 18,000 25,000 300 25.000 27.000 200 40,500 53, 517 43,300 52,200 recognizes suit resolution. 12,500 45,000 -0- -0- 5, 000 4, 000 -0- -0- 1, 755 18,750 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 10,000 20,000 12,000 1, 500 3, 000 4, 000 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 3, 000 2, 000 27, 500 5. 000 66,SOO 20,SOS SO,SOO 37, 500 262,025 234,180 256,730 272,732 9. 000 271,825 1- 285 11.500 -0- 235,465 268,230 272, 732 114,000 31,875 42,520 42,770 15,650 4, 000 12.500 42,941 7, 493 16,502 20,023 7,859 -0- -0- 114,000 32,000 45.000 31.000 16,000 -0- 12.000 -0- 34.000 40.000 30.000 15.000 15.000 6. 700 263,315 94,810 250,OOO 140,700 535,140 330,283 510, 230 413,432 (2) i h •jh ,>»■ 71' f .«■ ' y ■ 7 5 7<rr.%V ll#-i^. i‘v :t %K- lv-'&- f.r;•«*•; IjS«- J •T- • V »', .pSI'.S' ". j?:- t';W i#i'' >?;a* S''- ' \ ■‘'-l#fe *, ''- |4;c^?^:<r. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Draft Position Description Technician for Management Plan Implementation May 29, 1992 OBJECTIVE: To provide staff service in support of achieving Iwplementation objectives within the time limits established by the Management Plan for Lake Minnetonka. REPORTS TO: TASKS: Executive Director 1.Undertake assignments involving Work Program Activities in the Management Plan Implementation chapter within the established Management Plan proposed date of completion. 2.Service lead agency requirements to facilitate involvement of cooperating agencies in achieving the Work Program Activities. This may involve one or more of the following: LMCD board members in committee or sub committee studies, coordinating activity assignment. b.establish contact and working relationships with cooperating agency staff to identify agency resources available to assist in achieving Work Program Activities. c.Pscilitate, supervise where designated, work of consulting agencies under contract to carry out specific Work Program Activities. Develop reports, findings and recommendations result of lead and cooperating agency studies. 3.Advise the executive director on the progress of lead and cooperating agency studies being performed on Work Program Activities. 4.Hake recommendationk;? Program Activity pr .. dates. on priority adjustments to Work » wies which may impact completion S.Conduct appropriate communications on reports, findings Activities. ;s;).. ^ - ‘ -iV 47^" P V> •( .J : - ' f-V’ LAKE niNNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Draft Consultant Assignment Management Plan Implementation May 29. 1992 i\} *• 4^ . PURPOSE: To provide specific expertise and specialization required to Implement certain Management Plan Work Program Activities during the 1993 LMCD program year. I&r;..; fey- . - ■- 'Ki' RESPONSIBLE TO: Executive director ASSIGNMENTS: 1.Aaalat LMCD and agency/city staff on Work Program Activities as identified and approved by the LMCD Board during the 1993 program year, including: siJpis'mm»' Develop program to assess water quality in a major sampling of Lake Minnetonka's 42 bay areas from 0SO008ment criteria previously established. Ipfeb-,. b.Prepare inter-agency agreement for a joint study with HN DNR to develop and implement: Site-,.. Improved fish and creel monitoring programs Identify and protect fish habitat Study impact of milfoil harvesting on fish populations and fish harvesting rates ■%; ■ fekffi spS-t*. feiiSSS-. ifa» .’iV w »y'jS iLc.it.' I'^5' 'V 4 J :/ ■h 1.1. j 2 r i • r t \ ! W t;i • • t U I.r I ii i. 4 • * f • I % it ••I • t ■ • I • > m aaeaiiggii^igaiy-^^ . ^ LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICTI03U.6J1 water PLVNNINC AND PROJECf I.NtPl.E.MENrATION 2492 Subd. 2. Expenses. The expenses of the district sh.nll be borne by the municipali- tics. The portion of the expenses of the district borne by caclr municipality must be in proportion to its net tax capacity provided that the portion of any one municipality may not be more than 20 percent of the total expense or less than $200. History: /P90 c J9I art 2 s 33 10JB.635 FUNDING OF DISTRICT. Subdivision I. Budget. The board must, on or before July 1 each year, prepare and submit a detailed budget of the district’s needs for the next calendar year to the govern ing body of each municipality in the district with a statement of the proportion of the budget to be provided by each municipality. The governing body of each municipality in the district shall review the budget and the board, upon notice from a municipality, must hear objections to the budget. After the hearing, the board may modify or amend the budget. Notice must be given to the municipalities of modifications or amend ments. Subd. 2. Municipal funding of district, (a) The governing body or board of supervi sors of each municipality in the district must provide the funds necessary to meet its proportion of the total cost determined by the board. (b) A municipality may raise the funds by any means that the municipality has to raise funds. The municipalities may each levy a tax not to exceed .00242 percent of tax able market value on the taxable property located in the district for funding the district. The levy must be within all other limitations provided by law. (c) The funds must be deposited in the treasury of the district in amounts and at times as the treasurer of the district requires. History: 1990 c 391 an 2 s 54 103B.64I REGULATIONS OF DIST RICT. Subdivision I. Authority and effect, (a) The district may adopt rules and regulations to effectuate the purpose of its establishment and the powers granted to the district. (b) The rules and regulations have the effect of an ordinance if declared by the board of directors of the district and stated in the rule or regulation. (c) The rules and regulations of the district may be enforced by the district by injunction in addition to penalties under this section. .Subd. 2. Adoption procedure, (.n) A rule or regulation must be suitably titled. (b) A rule or regulation must be adopted by a majority vole of ail of the members of the board of directors. The adopted rule or regulation must be signed by the chair, attested by the secretary of the board, and published once in an olliciat newspaper. (c) Proof of publication must be attached to and filed with the rule or regulation. Each rule and regulation must be recorded in the rule and regulation book by 20 days after its publication. Subd. 3. Penally. A person who violates a rule or regulation that has the force and elfect of an ordinance is guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to a sentence of not more than 90 days plus costs or a fine of not more than $100 plus costs. History: 1990 c 391 art 2 s 55 1030.645 PROSECUTION OF VIOLA! IONS. Subdivision I. Complaint for viol.'ition. A prosecution for a violation of .t Ic or regulation shall be brought in the name of the district upon complaint and warrant as in other criminal cases. If the accused is arrested without a wartanl. a written complaint shall be made, to which the accused shall be required to plead, and a wnrr.ini shall issue on the complaint. The warrant and all other process in such eases shall be directed for service to a police officer, court ofliccr, marshal, constable, or sheriff of any of the municipalities in the district. Subd. 2. Coiitplainl. It is a sufficient pleading of the rules and regulations of the .. . __________________ m ^T;■p"'".' '*i. j- •■ • S' m-'-m:' '■ m'K ■fe^-- ■-5ife-h:r:'- W‘ • • /oTot ^rv:^»^/^ Date: Subjects Ron Moorse, City Administra‘:or ji^\ John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director June 18f 1992 City Facility - Frontage Road Name ^9s!^ ^ %O mip- * pi. mw Quite some time ago we discussed a road name for the frontage road being constructed to serve the new City facility. Because our two~way radio license is due for renewalr it only makes sense to renew the license with the address of the new facility. I*'.' -’Tv Therefore# Council should suggest or determine the name of the frontage road as soon as possible. Isv •Mx ' ■ S‘ t7K " J. ifpip ; . k'.. " t ■ '$i.p ^ -m W&x^mx. m .r'H mi ii fi K < -i‘ fv TO; PROH: DRTB: Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator June Hr 1992 4p/ > - >^0/0CfK ^<555 .^1.^ SUBJECT: City Hall and Public Works Buildings Application arfwd Certificate of Payment No. 4 Attachment: Application and Certificate of Payment No. 4 Kraus-Anderson Construction Co. Braun Intertec Steininger Construction Molin Concrete Gresser Concrete/Masonry Mannstedt Steel Kremer and Davis Allied Mechanical Met-Con Construction $ 7,443.00 $15,135.65 $39,600.00 $ 6,445.00 $23,247.90 $ 2,500.00 $ 1,516.50 $13,046.00 $21,611.00 We have received from Project Construction Manager John Divies approved application for payment of work at the city hall and public works locations as follows; - Kraus-Anderson Construct! an Co. - For construction management services for May, $7,443.00 - Braun Intertec - for testing concrete and grout, $15,135.65 l»fe ^ .'.r ■4^. ,v' • - steininger Construction - for site preparation earthwork, $39,600.00 - Molin Concrete - for structural precast concrete at public works $6,445.00 - Greaser Concrete/Massonry - for concrete block work at public works, $23,247.90 - Mannstedt Steel - for public works structural steel embeds, $2,500.00 feSE- - Kremer and Davis, Inc - for waterproofing at public works, $1,516.50 - Allied Mechanical Systems - for public works location $13,046.00 - Met-Con Construction Co - for public works building erection, $21,611.00 - V'-- ' ■ & The attachments are presented for your approval. x'rVK '-f: : ... i * pfe. Ilfco -'= mr- ^?k:: ■ wm ■■* ■^'.ijvSTrf,;' •’•< itvffV- ‘■■ mM-’ RE^'S5'''t¥-'" mf^ ,Mm. {jr;,',:-; ,v'*i»r- i»A' ... ■fe - ■ w- • ■■e?> page 2 City Hall and Public Works Buildings Application and Certificate of Payment No. 4 Requested Action:. Council approval of /architect's Application and Certificate for Payment No. 4 as presented. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, to approve City Hall and Public Works Buildings Architect's Application and Certificate for Payment No. 4 as presented. Motion, __ ayes, __ nays .....few* I 41 41 s-'i 'te-:‘KS ■■ mm'-‘ K-Siits ^m fefr t* pT pi- mm^!f'»fV'‘ >.T ^ (n ,9 3 3J C Z ^ ^^ fO -% 3 01 0> 3 C O en V* ■S o >^ c C O =i 3=- rr Q.o> o ■ 0 3S lO o 2 5: 3 S' tf» „ o cn W o o 5 2, :h' apia t>. ■■■ ' Co o 3 > 3 O X -Imo-H 3 3 9 9 ■§ roro IN) Zoa 0» 3 z S?So o 3 tncn >.o 2 c/> ^ - (D ooz-H 33 > Xo X 5 mo -H C/> -0s o •» E> si ^ o CD fti ? c I i Xo fii u»u>o fN)u X Xo mo 3 9 C X o cg: o o ^ H » ^ OJ o i: Sa • TJ T3m m X 3 5 So o -• 3O 3) ? o 5 2 25o 3cr (B mo S SD) a> «< *< 2 O >■o *0 o > O) -* Tloc (O S «o to ro N) (O (O o ■u oz >zo oma o > •n Oa a > Smz X l<8 X 0*1(0o(fl '.^ ^ ^ « .!■ . jlk. • fr i (piS ■ ;#.? fg- ■ it-iv •■^vrp % ■■ lxt ‘ $2 5 oC m o • - CD S • >-I : , 'f.. v' M'«' '••'Vi. . V___ 1:, ISi. P: ' V % 4^ i'- I ;fe' iS;e l( ►- / '■*• Vs\ ijV ,V . •fV:> 11 w l^f- p'"h- ♦V s;?;• I- t.:v"' r..- ;.- V- ' r . . '■- p • •■ ■■ . ,s ■ <* : , eI' iP:- it frtltls, li li' •_k- ' • pfe-i fi'\ ■ , 5; i, ;V::'t‘^:' fe. vv te ■H;I'P ; 1 ff:,^';J L' -rf-! ■ V V pifv,. lilt Sfe" ■ ■ ■■ MB: 1^' ^s: '^■ xvs.' •i' l!r' W U3 .4; «-■ ,vv.‘ •,"•»•'•■’ * ■ ■■V • ^ =: =• =• P- 3r* ;:* o ^ r* ^ sJ •» S C Q ^C X ^ O o O-5 C? •— 3 ' * O '•’ ri 3Z.-0 =:» ( m;I s|5Q ^raf • t^ rt — o S OQ- 3- Q « X - « L » 3 ^ c.? 5r'0 g 0^ ^ n 1 “'1^0 H n ^ 3 O O aM 2 3 C .3 ? Tl Si.5 3 5-3 ?: « a 5 ‘ ^^ § t» ~ cr SiSsIg-aS. -n 5?f|S O S^sif? »5 C* •* “ fi.O af ff — ^3^22®** 3> f 50 OQ -Ilf I m«“0 - —S 3 5 o Z 1^52^ 25 ^ ^ ^• r> o Gl ft* C* —3 a, rr 3T CL tfi o o *9 n=! 3 o Z 05 £ !S(3 f'\>f-irf\i'hrmn ifc. V |pi:V Ife- »mt:-- pjt M fe-^:-m- o ^H•■^ ft fi' I mm ^83 38fvJ — 8So^SSSS^^o<oo^oci^civ —5 fX >z 3 B i s o011CO 0m 1 CD 0T|1 • : : § .s ,® gg cn i “CO Q P p i pi .9 oee oooooooooooooooooooooo^§ 3 23 "=11 $ i 0 0 Fn 0 m 1M S tSoeo 0000000000000000000000-- (O I O OOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO fa sMi 34.169.8 > iS 8OOO O0'500000000000000000000l — ?S ii 9s3S 9S999939933SSS3?8?8gggl§1' i o» ^ = 8OOO oooooooooooooooooooooow = <-4 gi 1 ll* li N oeo 00000CO000000000000000S8 s-4 ^ I' c s ^ «• • &Off.o R& llIts a 8 ?f c?fll •T 91ff 3 ? 9 9 < a •a gS. * »s » II 1*5 £ 2 ?.55 a !P §■9 ? 3 9 or XI > « 5 ooz H Zc § oz </> Xm j- ' • — ■ V'.V ^ • • •• • ! # ' - N-:.—.• \ '.V , '■ . •' A . •»•» • V -- • “r-^ .• . • Tc--fe*i5»C~\.?C2 ^■-■35 ..-■ -1 i( »;* > t • ,*il < " - . * *; r* **■ > • ■ ••*», * • d*'- f.-w • •■•- * ••I • Hm ODs: C/) zm H O o > -<cn "T| JD O 7T z < O om o > m > COm jjm 2 z < Qom o > O 2 is 50 l-ir* i ii z <g om H- KD rsj 3m -H ^ zj m 5S zzm > “0 O no O C23 OX rv> CO S 2:z cncn ro I rn 3}2 2 § 8 z oi S3 m > no O-si f— § 5^5 6l 3J CJ Z cn cncn m *T|m 3 CO O 2j S9m3Smso fio 3mm -H z m i 0 1c/> (/> rn n «o cn !z5•o cn • -. ; .• .M i i d ■4 i -‘^4 ■| 1 i-r J ■ ^<:1 ivUNNSTEDT Sl9€l Fabricators NO.5967 no MAWWSTEDT and SOM. IMG. 1722 MILLER STREET □ LA CROSSE. WISC. 54601 □ (600) 784.1026 [ 4801 NICOLLET AVE □ MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55409 O (612) 022-2144 [ 0*T« 5/7/92 To* .TOURITE MiCfS 1-LOT t of* KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION 6 525 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESr~\ 554C-.T O OMtOMIfIMO s H ^•O "same c/0: rORONO MUNICIPAL BLDG. 0R‘. NO, MINNESOTA CONTII*CT>jQ* MO 92-019 T Q SAL€^ Rf WTATIVf TSo^OOL •#L M^Miacn 'CANMlCA TtMM* MOD NET 30 DAYSXhi2ii<n MANNSTEDT nAMtr omncLAM MO ■! C^scMfmoN STRUCTURAL STEEL EMBEDS AND EARLY ITEMS, INCLUDING DETAILING TO DATE. WCIOKT UNIT P9ice AMOUffT > MOE I 1 RECETv^D MAY 13 1522 total weight SUB total AMOUNT 12,500.00 PLUS state tak PLUS CITY TAX PLUS FPEIGMT OTAL INVOICE AMOUNT $2,500.00 Kv,' , i- - ■“ #■ 5* O" a r*5 ^ 51 ^&«: 5 to O 2 o ^ S ~i 14 i ^ A _ Msiss"! |||tlm r 21; § 3 8!• 5 n -r' O ifilli Ilf I sH 15 > ^ r^ w V Qi u§ Srt K fe'? 3 1 ^ r"5« t 'f -i i i n Oz > go ;o >•o "0 n > Oz •no 73 5 2m ^3: ® 2 3 2- C?* 2T*aZ to S. o :• 3 7^ S? > o ® 3 II 3 toZ V* 03- SI cr to i C2n < 3T .. 3.^n O D 3 n O 3 IT O n o 3 tJo n Oz 5 Q r>. * ^ ^•»o " W i^SSn> z ^ ^ n Ui H* LJ rt cn^ O TO Q*< CD O o h-h o z TO -L; ^?o 0 01 a o o Do s $ tn LH w ho Ui cn Oc ft D- 2 K> H* ro D 0) 0) T3 O Z o hi rt CD < O > O’ hi 3 ^0:2 ro O’ C hi gcr o hi O’3 > TOn I H o •-• rT> o Q h-* 3T H* cn c/i - CD o 3: O f • 1 f?9 n 5: H- o o in •z 3 a Ln in ui rt hi o ff 0) ft hl^ H- (n rt (D hi O rt hi Xcn s O’ CD C M H- \ K-* hcj P. O H- h- D h"' 03 O cn ID O’ D Di 0> a >cn inoo n Oz 5Q 2 > S * o n ;s X “Om TO > •o TJ Q m oo o >3r O’ Oz Zo I hO fsj I V£) ro « O VO VO ro ri n n □ a 5 n O < cr 2 c 5 ^ Q Q o 73 73 O 3 1ja > "O "D or- >zo nm TO n m 5 Oonc ;> rn \J O Kj 3%/* Cn O 3 V* O 3 < V* OL f9 I -nora 2 2m 5o^ V, ' 0 / ', 1 \y m ip'LICRTICS FOR FAIi'yEKT I;: ' t:,< PROJECT K?.YE: OROSO PUBLIC V:?.K5 MCHIIECI'S PROJECT KO: 1124.04 ;.5?LIC?.TICS ‘ SC; APrllCATIGS CATi: PERIOD TO; T - • * ■ 5/22/92 5/31/92 MM********M******************* • HEX • DESOtimOII ON KURX • n. • i « t ft ftft*ft****ftftftft****ftftft*ftftftft****^***** i ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft 1 2 3 4 5 I 7 I 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 *FOOriKS k PIEBS *nOa KlOK 6UDC *ILOa HOVE GRADE *SLU k TQFPIK ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ■ » ^ MftMMi«Mftt****HM***i-v K? Kit.: • * * TOTAL SCBEDOLED* VALUE ********* 28275 38588 63681 53303 ******** FBCVIOUS A.»PL. ******** 28275 36588 31831 0 0 181827 ********* ******** K08I CaHPLETED 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96694 ********* ********* ********* THIS A??l. ********* 0 0 25831 25S31 ********* ********* MATERIALS PRESENTLY STORED ********* *************** TOTAL » t COM?LETED*COM? h STORED * TO DATE * *************** 28275 M.OO 36588 *1.00 57662 *0.91 0 *0.00 0 * ERR 0 * ERR 0 * ERR 0 * ERR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR ********* 0 * ERR 0 • ERR 0 * ERR 0 * ERR 0 * ERR 0 * ERR 0 * ERR 0 * ERR 0 * ERR 0 • ERR 0 * ERR 0 * ERR 0 * ERR 0 * ERR 122525 *0.67 *************** ********* BALANCE TO FIKISH ********* 0 0 5999 53303 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59302 ********* ********* RETAIXAGE ********* 2828 3659 5766 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12253 ********* A-- » “ m • -* *.' ‘ * • ** • —i ■ •♦.•^••*» • •* P >« ^ ^ - - - • «* >• •• . • . V • • ^ R ,Ma'^'' •iW''v“^ ' • '* ‘ / * ** ' . * J* .-.\ * *7,‘-^ y I ;.r . . . • /• ^.■; T t:u..:. V - • \ V ^ '‘-I •• *♦• •. • ‘ P •. d>v era G re I * -> ■ •*% rt* n oz 3 >o H ca c« m X j> >ui H O H > s s n o> >5 tn H O Jlm >o 5 == Xz O H Q fit r< r O EC Otn . r -< SP Sz 1-4 X H O H > ?; m2 Oc S sssae <-n :»• rrt c/» c/> 2 s s s c: =*^«cn m 90 • ^ CO «SS S CO ac r-i U*l CO S CO —• CO o no o L o > Hm p*a f I VO tvj V > r "T1 5 <O s '■3i ro SI s* 1-^ OJ ro o ^ h-^ ?!■«&= > ^ rr B# 53 o 2 o ^ S§5^32 n— o. y J Q. S ^ S = O ^ n 3 <• 1-0 2:« < m£ sr =E o 3Js2 J H |£l s m ^ - *-i *^ Sf. 2 Xs C cl3 o — 2 II "3 = =3 c.^ ;r 3 3 — t, *< 2. i CL >' 3 =.<»= • 2 s ^ 2 -■t-2n=s=5 rt ^1 r. o 2^ ri <• 2- c O' ? 3^2 S 22 r ^'^°Q 5 =o E “• •• ^ S a 3 ?G 2 O^ o -c r • w » rS ^ —Vj 3 2i:=! cn 5 -4^ cn c=j o o 53 hH i? ^5 > Sr \D o» O 2 ^ UJ M• • • • r* n 2 OO o 2. 50 ^ 21 n O ^ %J% m 3 ^» = S ^ ST > O ■iir o __ s m 9 8 ^ ^ -£> I o X O wt □ □ □ □ □ s n>Oc . § 5 ^ f • • 5 ^ .Lir r1^i 9 .IE PUBLIC WORKS BLDG ORONO MN 3NCRETE PRODUCTS CC I AC ST LINO LAKES. MN BS014 612-786-7722 fiexicore i 7 CITY OF ORONO X KRAUS ANDERSON CONST 525 8TH ST S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55404 1 i ■i L...J DATE INVOICl NO i 05/08/92 2749 ------------—i 1^'r,HiPru) OS/92 1 JOB NO CUSTOMER ORDER NO TERMS ' 91536 NET TODAYS SFRV1CE CHARGf 1 PER MONTH (ANNUAL 18%) ON PAST DUE AMOUNTS K\ f NO DESCRIPTION S' I vn*.'- ii;s- ■t,:" ■ 'm' m. k.r ■ ',’:r. ■K;'" ‘i'-: PARTIAL. BILLING FLEXICORE MATERIAL LABOR TO"INSTALL.: PERFORMANCE BOND 6035.S# 1000.00 126.00 I• •• u INVOICE TOTAL 7161.00 > .•rr. ORIGINAL INVOICE # • • .• .* *•* > m-. ^:^p: ■ i 4 ■Td A w r*¥---V- .•'-■v£.«.;;?t': ^r-- ^;-''V J '4,;m & V. k vr r i IwBv ii- /-►^. l-ii- .• , '' . - ‘ ■ pfc ^vv;.:-w; :» •v.lfi in ^sk'-. ^«< X.; KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY COMRACTORS «s CQn :STRLC~:ON .\UNAG£R? Invoice ^P28446 June 3. 1992 City of Orono P.O. Box 66, 1335 Brown Road S. Crystal Bay, MN 55423 Attn: Mr. Tom Kuehn Finance Director Re:Orono City Hall K/A Project #4059 For Payment This request for payment is for constriction management services of Orono City Hall, as per the contract for the month of May 1992. Amount Due: $7,443.00 .......■v',1 ■ Minneapolis Division 525 South 8th Street. Minneapolis. MN 55i04 Phone: (612) 332-7281 FAX: (61 2J 332-8739 C/.o',) Or»nr>r-••*•**• Fmplf^vafmm•i . . j -A • .■if — > m- m a" ^ i n - O ft • 3 ^ • S, S’ ? r ^ ^5 2 3:or H &S 2 ? ft 5?I|S (l O «■» 3 5 n It «• *5. — —'•5 r» “* «—< o ^ *• o Z^ « «= C. 3 O ” -■ r: -3 3 c 3 C-C-^ 3 3 _. a, ■< 2. « Q. i-g n= s'? c lIsS:^« 3 S ? g^n 2. - ? •' o «^ o S ^ :r^ jr ^5 —^ ^ = a o n o « 2:5 lii o5-a^o 1^5-3-Ssgz?^*' ± c •• cr .2 3 >2o I /•^\ ; 0.5 5^ I v/' -r n n 0 2 5- O 2 ^ Ul M ^ • • • • n Z O Q O 2 50 > Z n O O - *^ *^ *^ %• <* s ig- > O n < <t> o □□□□□5 n > o c .§ n 5 ?5 ± r.5 ^ 2 on rl If % STEININGER CONSTRUCTION CO.. INC. 3070 Lexington Avenue South ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55121 No' '1495 Phone 454-1980 ft Kraus-Anderson-Construct3.on-Corapany. 525-South_8th-Street- - - - - - - - - date__May_19,_ 1992-----joe NO. Orono City Hall/Police and JOB NAMEpublic-works-Buildings ----- jtinaeapolis r-^fi-55404 TtRMS JOB LOCATioNOj^j^o _ MN----- 'V- p- p: irr F'i- -» . A •* — Sf: Iss::' isS';L. Earth Work DESCRIPTION CONTRACT EXTRAS TOTAL CONTRACT AND EXTRAS PREVIOUS BILLINGS WORK COMPLETED TO DATE PRICE amount 254.^-000 30. 161,000 LESS: PAYMENTS .312M.9 2_$.6 0,7_5 0_. 0_0 4/16/92 $45,000.00 BALANCE DUE: $51,500.00 less 10% Retainage 213,300 --3 1-OA a5-0_ _0.Q. ' $46,350 .1 j. BRAUN INTERTEC Broun bilMfue Inglnnoring, Inc. P O Box 3?IOe Minnoopolit, Minnxiolo 35^39 Telaphon* 612-941-5600 F(u: 612 942-4860 'A !^ • A H OANTt Mr. Ron Moorse - A«Jm I ns tra tor City of Orono 1335 South Brown Road f>0 Box 66 Crystal Bay, Mn 55323 PROJECT: INV. DATE INVOICE # PROJECT 6 CLIENT # 05/03/92 006077 BABX-92-120 007241 CLIENT REE: KA PR# 4059 • S \7 CONSULTING SERVICES DETAIL Engineering Technician II Senloi* Engineering Assistant PrJcct Engineer Senior Staff Engineer S'ecretnrial Services HOURS RATE AMOUNT 184.00 39.00 7,176.00 29.50 60.00 1,770.00 34.25 65.00 2,226.25 0.50 85.00 722.50 4.50 32.00 144.00 260.75 12,038.75 %N-SALARY EXPENSES DETAIL 'S' iDirect Expenses P Laboratory Testing QT/ 1.00 test RATE 75.0000 li • Laboratory Proctor Test Standard or Modified Method A 3.00 test 90.0000 Laboratory Proctor Test Standard or Modified (ASTM 069 Method B, C, or D Concrete Cylinder Processing and Handling fits ‘V Standard Curing (ASTM C 39) 6” X 12" molds Compression testing of Grout or Core Fill (ASTM C 1019) Analysis of Determination of Materials Finer Than No. 200 Sieve (ASTM C 117 or 0 1140) SfS'. mimt fKiy from this Invoica onil includ# ramiftanca copy with poymanl* Tarmit Nat 30 doyi, I ya% par month oftar 30 doys, 18% annual percantaga rota. iiigifiaarlfig, anvlromnantol ond povamant consulting sanrices AMOLIN r 75.00 270.00 50.00. Per Cylinder 1 • - *e * 3.0000 ' •• f 174.00T •< * • 1 50.00 Sample 9.0000 522.00 58.00 Each 1.5000 87.00 1.00 Each 35 0000 35.00 13.00 Test 25.0000 325.00 BRAUN INTERTEC Iraun IniMite InglnMrtng,! P.O Boa 39)08 MinAMpoiit, MimtMOlo 55439 T*i«pkon«: 6I2*94)'5600 Foa: 6)2-?42-4880 PROJia: Hr. Ron Noorse - Adniin^trator CHy of Or ono 1335 South Brown Road [RO Box 66 INV. DATE INVOICE # PROJECT # CLIENT # 05/0S/92 006077 BABX-92-120 007241 Crystal Bay, Mn 55323 ) CLIENT REF • f *- - - KA PR# 4059 plrtct Expenses WLS TESTING DEPARTMEL> Nuclear moisture density meter charge In addition to hourly rates In section ’•100”. QTY 40.00 Hour RATE 15.0000 AMOUNT 600.00 1.00 Per Stop 29.00 Day Concrete Cylinder Plck-up r.Per day i-. (automobile and 4x2 pi cl up truck) 1. 102.00 Mlle(s) Per wile (automobile and 4x2 pickup truck) 20.0000 17.0000 20.00 493.00 . 4500 495.90 ** TOTAL PROJECT BABX-92-120 3,096.90 15*, 135.65 rssess St i-f • * • I i ♦ * ' m 3T I K.: pay from thU invoko and includa romittonco copy with poyntant. 0M:. ■. ... Tarnui Not 30 doys, 1 '/i% par month oftor 30 days, 18% annual porcontago rate, Ingtnaoriap, onviraamantal and povemonl consulting services ■m A T :» i :■ ,'i! k'r^r:It'S *is' :•- ■Vy ,v.^ r5;v^'Mi,~i>'t-v W' ■wH ,W!S' ■'W.-1‘-' •..Mv <"'-■ Li',■''■• *Vm-^-m-- <■. ■ •' i'x 1 :, f ■4-‘'- ■K-.i‘f.'M' i:: ■ i:- ■■ ■••• % V!^% TO:Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Adninistrator PROM:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator OATE:June 15, 1992 SUBJECT: Windward Marina - Request for 1991 Fee Reduction List of Exhibits A - Letter to Windward 5/21/92 B - Letter to Windward 3/6/92 C - Letter to Windward 2/20/92 D - Letter from Windward 2/17/92 B - Letter from Wii dward 1/1/92 F - Letter to Windward 12/6/91 G - Council Minutes 11/25/91 H - Council Minutes 4/23/90 1 - Staff Memo 4/18/90 Discussion Mr. Rivers appeared at the June 11th Lake Use Committee meeting requesting further consideration for a reduction of his 1991 license fee. Lake Use Committee Chairman Callahan agreed to present the issue at the June 22nd Council meeting, and noted the City would not take legal action regarding the 1991 fee prior to that meeting. Please review the attached Minutes, memos, and correspondence. To briefly review, in 1990 Gayle's Marina and North Shore Drive Marina submitted their license applications with only the $200.00 base fee, noting that due to low water they were unsure as to how many slips they could put into service. Pursuant to the staff memo of 4/10/90, Council discussed this issue on 4/23/90. Minutes reflect that the consensus of the Council was to waive the slip fees. No specific vote was taken. The question of whether marinas who had already paid the full slip fees should have them returned, was never brought up, nor was it made clear whether the fee waiver was to be offered only to those who requested it. Consequently, no other marinas were informed of nor offered the slip fee waiver. In 1990 Windward paid the full license fee. In 1991, Windward made no 1991 license application until January 1, 1992. Mr. Rivers indicated that less than 50% of his slips were rented out in 1991 due to low water conditions and the slow economy. 7T^ irP W-'. A f - M '^Ir' 'v '.& ^ •:-U ■J'i.'f--^ i^^'V v!-’' '('■ Memo June 15, 1992 Page 2 In his January 1st letter that accompanied the 1991/1992 application, Mr. Rivers requested a reduction in the 1991 fee and an 0X^^iision of the fee deadline date. The 1992 fee, with accompanying letter specifying the fee was for 1992, was submitted February 17, 1992. Mr. Rivers was advised February 20th that the Lake Use Committee nroceedina oer the Council directive of November 25, 1991rCCOIWndUlCQ pro 6_Q P_ _1QQ1 4-Vio IQQ^ 1 -5 r*An«owSJcK™required compl^^ payment of 1991 fees before the 1992 license would be reviewed. The Lake Use Committee in mid-January did consider whether a reduction of Windward's 1991 fee was appropriate, but the reduction received little support. Mr. Rivers requests that he be allowed the same fee redtiction for 1991 as two other marinas received in 1990. Windward's standard fees for 1991 would have been $436.00 ($200.00 base fee, $236.00 slip fee for 118 slips). Staff concluded from Lake Use Committee and Council discussions that no 1991 late fees would be charged for those marinas paying 1991 fees by January 1, 1992. Windward's 1992 fee of $436.00 did not include the $50.00 late fee which technically was required because that fee was submitted on February 18, after the January 15th due date. Council is on record as being prepared to grant 1990 through 1992 licenses to Windward Marine upon payment of outstanding fees. Note that the three marina operations we have licensed this year all made application on time, hence late fee was not an issue. Foaeible Optiona ■' ■ Council may wish to consider the following options for the 1991 license fee: A. $436.00 plus $50.00 late fee. $436.00. $200.00 base fee plus slip fee for number of slips actually rented out in 1991. $200.00 base fee only. (C) or (D) plus $50.00 late fee. Other. B. C. D. S. F. BgtoStaff ■idatlon r--Option C might be a fair compromise. Mr. Rivers would have to provide documentation for the number of slips rented in 1991 lich V-- Staff recommends no waiver of the 1992 late fee. i jii il'-fl- ■ »■ ■>'' ■ ‘ < ' • ■ Hi’ CITY of ORONO ManidfHl Cn-«al Bay. Mimaoti SS31WI0W May 21, 1992 Windward Marina, Inc. 1444 Shoreline Drive Hayzaia, Minnesota 55391 Re: 1992 Orono Marina License Dear Mr. Rivers: Th. City Council "i®4j^*'oV;no''conmerc meets the years 1990-1991-1992 will be issued ...................... “ "“*outstanding . I note from our files that bituminous o*? o'ccTp^ncyl before your expired on June 30, 1991. Per ^Jli,“.Tt't:"co^%ted irru.jel7 frsLon to/avoid bavin, th. City Sraw upon that certificate for completion of the work. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at Sincerely, Michael P. Gaffron Asst. Planning fi Zoning Administrator MPG/ch fe#.; 'i'*' " -■ TELETHONE - 473-7357 • FAX - 473-<>510 m.. m-. CITY of ORONO Municipal Oflkca PdiiO(BtDtBtti6i 07>nl Bij; Mtewwtt 5S323-0W6 March 6, 1992 •--1^ i-‘ Windward Marine, Inc. 1444 Shoreline Drive Wayza'ta, Minnesota 55 3 91 ATTENTION; Jim Rivers Res 1992 Marina Licensing Process Dear Mr. Rivers; The Orono Lake Use Committee on March 5th determined that rather than mn.tnua the oast oractice of withholding licenses until all ..ssues reeolved/liceSses for 1991 and 1992 will be “""I nnnn of comoleted application forms and payment. Current licenses will be issued based on the site plan approved with your most recent city license. The committee has directed that violation tags be issued to any marina operating without a Ixcense during 199 . The Lake Use Committee is reviewing the current marina ordinances and in the next few months will be reviewing each °PYsVues of become familiar with the specific site plan and past issue concerns. The Committee's intent is to confirm the current %re code compliance by each marina, and determ^ine specific aspects of each marina that should be brought into great CCMQpliance in the future. Wa racognize that some marinas have been granted site requirements such as hardcover or setbacks, improvements. Although it is not necessarily .r.alina of S«ittee to require \ wholesale renovation axlatino facilities to meet the current code standards, issues rlilltng to itnd^apin, and screening, impact on lake «se- neighboring properties, and general operation of marinas, potential topics for discussion. •-L TELEPHONE - 473-7357 • FAX - 473-0510 •I J is-’ •,'* ^ • • Kindward Marine, Inc. March 6, 1992 Page 2 ■^f;- 'i ■i*'4vW:^ ^ r •t*-1^;- dL. ■ w< V?V-'" ■ I#"/ 'M'!0 W" ■'Pi':--- ’ .' As a starring point, on March 19th (7:45 a.m. in the City Council Chanbers) the Committee will be reviewing the current ordinance and discussing what revisions might be appropriate, if any. You are invited to attend this meeting to contribute to the discussion. Attached to this letter is a brief synopsis of your marina operation. During the week of March 10th through 14th, if you can free up an hour, I would like to meet with you to do a quick tour of your site and update the status of any issues which may have been raised in the puckets. Please also review the information enclosed and let me know if you feel any of it is incorrect or inaccurate. jy you have not completed submission of your 1991 or 1992 license applications and fees, please do so as soon as possible so those licenses can be issued. e I hope to hear from you and meet with you next week. Sincerely, lei” #;#• . SinciMTc ly f Michael P. Gaffron Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator MPG/ch Bnc. cet Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A, Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Adm. Lake Use Committee ■ f. * . : : A /oT o\\CITY of ORONO MunnpBl Offices Pod Office Boi 66 Crydal Bey. Mmofsoce i JIKATIJ .1. February 20. 1992 Windward Marine. Inc. 1444 Shoreline Drive Wayzata. Minnesota 55391 ATTENTION; Jim Rivers Dear Mr. Rivers; Thank you for payniont of your 1992 marina license fee, which was xaceivi^ by this office on February x8, 1992.fVCCXVViW awj ------------- regarding your request mYcWa^nufry.' ^he directive of November 25. before 1992 licenses will be ^2^!i:n.‘’“^::aS:tfon”of\U=r9ri 1?=-^% fees aue to low water or emiramic conditions received little support. In 1990 the Council did allowing marinas to Shore Drive Marina and fbase $200.00 fee. Also in continue to operate having P nnerates a gas dock, was unable to”:su?ru:%^\%Vw%%«= Vn fees. Attached is a copy of ^he memo article you referred to. It which apparently 9®herate * lieu of direct contact withla hot our intent to use the newspapers in Council on license yon. . This Jfv noint of view did not contain ne«_orUpdate unevou. Tnis memo woa -- r v 4 ow did not contain new ot llllt-thtlteVinrinio%"mAl^^ » front-page headline^ SS5:!j;rV*d'oV5| h^-°%”ny"^°cntr“oV o-ver-^what the papers choose to print. m ... telephone - 473-7357 • FV\ • 47W)5 10 Windward Marine, Inc. February 20, 1992 Page 2 ikj. S-^ I .xp.=t the I-aKe -e narina licensing ^art to meet with marina owners perhapsanticipate the Connnxttee will w^art^to^_^ concerns, and perhaps that in late March to discu to discuss your fees. For the time I^Tinl I%- ln'T;°/e“te«t:\”’hat^°ycur 1991 license application fee is past due ift Sl Please contact ise at 473-7357 if you have further questions Sincerely # Asst!*Planning*t°2oning Administrator ’** * i 'ir- /• ‘ IE- lif', Si*": MPG/ch £nc e Cc: -Cl "S'vV-i- ■- Jeanne A. Mabusth, Bldg, s Zoning Adm. Ron Moorse, City Adm. City Council V a ; J» . . '■? iiv. ■ ■ i:0'’ St* W:t r-Ei ■ ^Ev:- .. Ei,. ■r '7'-;v :-V-^ S5‘ '•■ K&,. :»:w- ; />• 'i’K. ■%r ’^v- y>. i-. . m- r I: !'V.. |: k-' ’iy r- ' ^'r- 'J*. ■ -V'i? i!^'- h.m iiir W •- .^u » « .• *--■■: W--' m •4 WINDWAR Marina Canter On Minnetonka m tea r" Ii L ------n J FE3 t e 1232 February 17,1992 Michael P. Gaffron Qty Of Orono P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 51 Dear Mr. Gaffron: ^ . As I stated In my latter to you on January 1,1992, I could pay my 1992 license fee when my dock income started coming in. Inclosed is my check for $436 to cover this fee. Also In this letter, I made a request for a reduction of the 1991 fees because of the feet that less that half of my slips were rented out in 1991. I think the city reduced ♦ • « ' ttie fees for some marinas In 1990 because of the low water. Is this not true? I have 7-not received any response from the dty ninvs paper. I think it would be better for Orono to talk to me directly ttian through the news paper, don't you? •s • f • ♦ ^ •* • ► Siriperely. ‘ V.•*. /, * f'- y. RImrs m a Sarvfc4 Dockage S Stomge 1444 Shoreline Drive, Wayzata Mrt 5539f (612)-473^49 ....... ■^.:r :-f■& W" .^ V' V ' ■ &-'' |i|.r-:. »'i-.'WINDWARD_ ww Marina Canter On Minnetonka > . *. JAN T 1992 January 1.1992 Michael P. Gaffron City of Orono P.O.Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Dear Mr. Gaffron: Pss-:. r ;!•. ■:i' t-',.■ ■ m.. ^,, r^. •: . fe. &iclosad is the dock application for Windward Marine. I would like to point out to you that because of the low water conditions and the slow economy, Windward Marine rented out only 50% of the slips in 1990 and less than that in 1991 . Because of this condition, I am asking for a reduction in the 1991 license fee. Also I am asking fcr a extension of the 1991 and 1992 license fee payment until my dock income starts coming in. It is not my intention to not pay for a license from Orono but after paying a large increase to the LMCD for their license. I am with funds at this time. Please beai Kvith me on this, V. .. . c sincerely i?. "**■**! ,i *'• ••• ;* h'. V U i-*.-If-- ' - ■ f V ' ■ •'' - f. <»»<( / SrieB a Sflrvfcft OockBge a Stomgs 1444 Shoreline Drhre, Wayzata MN 55391 (612)-473-8249 : %r*-s .. . V . . , -H'. i: '*A'.'iv V :,‘ **■ r':&m /'i«_ •''if -pW--: CITY of ORONO Munid|ial Oflkas Port one* Bostf Ci7«al Baji, MiomMti 5 .\»4Zl I December 6, 1991 Windward Marine, Inc. 1444 Shoreline Drive Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 ATTENTION: Jim Rivers Dear Mr. Rivers; Enclosed is an application for your 1992 Orono Commercial Marina License. Please return the completed application and appropriate fee no later than January 15, 1092. 1991 application (form enclosed) no later than January 1, 1992. issue 1991 licenses retroactively with the 1992 licenses. iM-s Please contact me at 473-7357 if you have any questions. Sincerely, MICHAEL P. GAFFRON Asst. Planning * Zoning Administrator MPG/ch Enc. - 1991 Application 1992 .application 1990 License Application (for reference) Vc-; telephone -473-7357 • EAX*4734510 msm^ i ! J Vi •■ - -v; ■j 1 - -'■ ^..- ^%'*- • !?»■I ,*;■ : V.' • • U-- :v •• i' •r^ minutes of the regular orono council meeting - NOVEMSIR 2i. J§ii COUNTY ROAD 15 SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS - CONT. V *.» <*, * ^ ahilitv to do road work is linitec to State aidMurphy noted the ability to ao funding. Callahan felt they should go ahead and do the study. . that the project may not be able to fully address S-J^ncer^rre^rtL^?! ?he^road. ♦ that inaior maintenance is long overdue forButler commented that major commence with whatever county Road 15. and improve pub 1ic safety while still luprovements ^She noted the original intent of the ?hat n Should be paved the way 1t 1s driven. I. .4 4.P thP entire roadway would need to be dug up ®n^I?ily“and flit That Jhl roadway should allow for local access at all times. XSjs Srp?ov1ded%o “loc^‘"?raffic^ind emergency vehicles. It was moved 11 c“'"safitj? ''^tr^condCct'^ a County. In the creation of passing and turning u“ron%ou^fy'' Roar?5 ^thin Orono. w^ maintaining the htShway as a 2 lane road. Ayes 4. nays 0. (#10) OPTIONS FOR MARINA LICENSE REVIEW Gaffron noted he is looking for direction regarding 1932 marina ncenses. and felt the Council has two options. 1 TO commence the review process with a Committee, following Staff review, and to resolve any Issues. 2 TO issue the license as an administrative function and to deal with the Issues as they come up. jabbour felt It would be appropriate to follow the second option. Mayor Peterson disagreed. Jabbour noted he sensed allows hundreds of boats proposal, when at the there should be a commercial Sith the marina ’Seal with land use site plan review for marinas whi started Issuing Issues comprehensively. He noted Is controlled °i;.'’f:irth Cn^u^rJS?? Gannas ar.by the LMCD. .. ^requirements within residential ^i?g^io?hSlds anS: the best protection of rights of the residents. wm t R' minutes of the regular orono council meeting - NOVEMBER 25. 1991 OPTIONS FOR MARINA LICENSE REVIEW - CONI. Butl.r noted that OaOOour is suggesting that marina licenses be limited to land use solely. this review would be done annually. Mayor Peterson asked If this review wo X should be done once and those "lons'o? ajproval should be taken to court. violating Callahan noted he had no °*>^*|Ji°"to%ach ^martJIa op^Ito^ ‘2ho Should lp^ «Jlon. and telling them they cannotfailed to submit a 1991 app i licenses have been open for business the following ^ marina is in violation of $h2“®«de! *?hrop;rat1on should cease for a pre-determined time period. jabbour reiterated that the reason they^had suggested a^^credit was because the 1991 fee, and they should bethat only l marina did not pay tne required to do so. Vv saffron reviewed that ?t3 years^ago.^ ^aKS^iIs“dLn'’anrbusthess operators to waive the P . ^ that one year the gas station was not doing so well. ijLnse and did not open that A, allowed not to lose their right to veer, but Council stated tn ^ ^ ^ee has not been reopen. He noted the 1991 sent in the application ”«1ved from Windward Marine. ap^ied to 1991 Zt asked that the P'‘!;'l°“* bu? no slip fee. All other license, and ®*?9gi f„ He noted that making all "aninas r ?S’da?5*mif not"; in keeping with past councils decisions. Callahan noted that if that were for only one year. Me felt they .Si ,S-ur:f Butler noted that ttiey should fees. forget the past and P®*] should address land use Issu”; Lmber of slips. She noted the issues. She felt this was a new shouldn't go back for past due Gaffron requested a°"^^''"'jt1on that the^Councn no^ t,ants to open *lMr~2i*~J"appUca?ion Jor a license and pay past due fees. ■riv-te**': a * .'i i: ^ ■' 'r. cv- ■ ft. ;ry>? ■f :X- ir-' VI u. Vr- minutes of the regular ORONO council meeting - NOVEMBER 25, 1091 OPTIONS FOR MARINA LICENSE REVIEW CONI. ♦,•11 hari to issue 1991 licenses, and it would Jabbour felt they sti marinas pay for the license and allow be unfair to ™ake up with a proposal for Others not to. He LMCD will now dealing with 1992 next year to be issued in Decembe;' of require licenses the City would know in January whothe previous year. Therefore tne u y was licensed for that year. ♦. .4 ♦h-w mav need to make amendments to the code, and Callahan !eal with the 1J91 license,felt It was unfair not to oea i witn Mayor Paterson felt the n,oney for 1991 should either be refunded or credited. llTtU. llVeole the necessary anendnents. Mayor Peterson suggested there be a seadline for the 1992 fees aSd after that a penalty fee be assessed. Gaffron noted the fee schedule provides for a $50 late fee ♦ .aH 4-Kdit the wav to make ':hese marinas conform is c?osf“?he1r Sus^ness until they are -ithin the requirements the code. to of It -.5 moved by Oabbour. seconded by Mayor ^Peterson, ^after further consideration, ,H°the*i991 license fee that theyp:r bS?rr."“:hr^rd’2/ l9^^ efore the council will lonildar the 1992 license. Ayes 4. nays 0. Miir?o"«v?sr?Se“s^SreUn5'r:guUt1onl^*th^^^^^ not ba time to also revise the marina regulations. lahhour noted he has difficulty requiring a 1992 license fee on Sltjpage. which Orono doesn't govern. SSmSU. •:Sd"ih:‘'nure^ orsilpr?s^:®:e«Sre^S? regC?at1n| l^nS use. Excelsior regarding a marina owner. anS”JSi"jSdgr^ppea^”?;'^*vri::f d^hai'^h^LM^S'SSy have wrongfully prevented him from doing so. 0'iW ■y MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 25. 1991 r'OPTIONS FOR MARINA LICENSE REVIEW - CONT. ir.ri If that decision rendered any rights to the LMCO to ^;&“on!shoJe'S=^1v1t1es. such as drystacMng. Barrett was unfanlllar with any court case that gave the LMCO those rights. lighting of docks. (#11) SPATES AVENUE TRAFFIC CONCERNS 2riJatSr*?v^ni^ '|t,oufeyc«s “2"ra?f?c "or“^hr%estSenUa 1 Street. bcrming was agreed upon. B «<iar> asked how effective berming could be accomplished. and 52ki5 If“ p^Son could still use Railroad Avenue. .i’l Barhardson that for now S:t:r%:^so^: «JlS*stnrtS^h Smo spates Avenue and then Railroad Avenue. pile He down Mayor Peterson asked If this could be considered precedence setting. Barhardson noted that in similar situations, definitely. Dan Craar. Spates Avenue, submitted a petition from residents reguesting the closing. Callahan that to close a public road.^ mould need to gj ?he ncrease In the traffic count on Sli 1nSlcS?is “?!;2t tSe public wants to use the road. ?:??;ra?:5'thS; “piMIc^roaS?" and%eU*?iS .TuV's^olT, be notified. jabbour noted that he felt th« Pwb’^c^should^b.^^notlfl.^ and V,lT iUfjSSbSS? to^S'hlm hS was unaware of anything going on the road. He felt everyone should be notified. mm ■i 'j i •1 i-. ,v > • V " i- -. » • i^" r 1. ■• A ■i . ^'i!, 'vi. •■' lif' Vf ";■ • ■ <S:M- fcSf;. ^t-.^-Tv,. il.;ul-©- MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 23, 1990 Site and conununication with the citizens. Mayor Grabek suggested that the drawing be set up so that there will be an equal X'cpresentation of incn and women# location# aae# euC. that «T'ortr^8nVrronrtnitrA;^^^^=t^^^^ participate. Bernhardson said, '‘We will probably pull the entire list of 40 names and send letters to the 18. ^ some rejections, we will go down the list until we have 18. Mayor Grabek suggested that the persons selected be contacted by telephone first. A follow up letter could be sent if the person wishes to participate. This was an informational item and there was no motion ENCIHEERING SERVICES REVIEW Bernhardson presented information for council regarding a review of engineering services. eview Councilmember Goetten asked for information as to wnether our present Engineering firm has environmental engineers on staff. Bernhardson noted Goetten's request. There was no action taken on this item. **^*^^BernharSon ^^esented information to Council regarding a flexible benefit program, including the cost of implementatxo and continued operation. Mayor Grabek asked if a flexible benefit package exists for municipalities. Bernhardson stated that DCA has been providing this type of program for many municipalities in the area. No action was taken on this item. MJk&XMJk ralCEliSESBernhardson provided Council with information regarding the Kf ■f V - 12 - ;VW.. k r •. • y ■ I' * . ',-i. • -y' •' ■•^- 45 /d- ?. j ;> • S--‘. ■^v^ it... W':'' minutes of ORONO council meeting held APRIL 23, 1990 marina licenses CONTIITOED h-«n anv siqnificant land use TJtV .TZ. ZZrZy r>./Tse ca„,es an. is 'Seeding “hat a marina conmrttee not be established for je0vxftwin9 these licenses. % '■’* BA-,r ;-jj5 Bernhardson said that another issue i® the fee charged «.« «-Ko marinas He said that there is a base fee, as v/ell as a to the to the dryness of the lake, many marxnasboat/onit «h«9e. Due to jne ary council to consider ShUther “the City Ihould charge for the slips not being used and HSlympact that may have on the historical and future rights to boat slips. Gaffron stated that the LMCD’s policy for "grandfathering" if they are not licensed. Gaffron informed Council that many of the marinas are He Stated that Jim Dunn has made application to uh C^CD for 'a 300* doch extension and dredging. He said that he ““ not expect an application from Crystal Bay Service unless the lake level increases. Mayor Grabek said that he would prefer to give the marinas :XLg%fer*fofiL\°tra“!irs fcr-tnif *::“*• It was the consensus of Council that the extra boat slip fees be waived. Gaffron asked Council for their opinion regarding the establishment of a marina committee. Councilmember Nettles believed that this year was important laL and marinas because of the proposed LMCD Mulations ^He said that Orono has 30% of the Lake Minnetonka shoreline and has the most strict regulations for ine«rnreted the new LMCD policy as calling for increased la Nettles believed thlt would put mote pressure on O=o“° « Inellase the number of marinas, slip spaces, food J“*''“*9e »..daFs which in turn would cause more littering of the lake. SISSes' believed there were many people within could provide some insight and leadership fo i»ke, Hatties stated that the marinas are the access point to the .!5 therefMe, a good place to start. Nettles believec that ?htr2 are ^^rtant policiL and philosophical issues ?enerated by the LMCD report. Nettles was impressed with the tL like MiLetonka Lakeshore Owners Association had regarding th« report. - 13 - V. » ■ I&- •'* ■ :; '"Mm" -r -.^f€- ■.%, •*.MINDTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 23, 1990 MARINA LICENSES CONTINUED ,Councilmember Goetten said that she has been an advocate o. establishing a marina committee for several years. Go-.te agreed with Nettles. councilmember Cellahan referred to the minu.es o. the April 19, LMCD Meeting, paragraph 5D, regarding the development of an action program for public access to Lake Minnetonka. Callahan bIlieCed that a marina committee will be necessary to oefend itsilf and the citizens of Orono from the LMCD. Callahan asked ll anyone is familiar with the DNR Shoreland Grant Contract and PMparation for Cities to sign as Partners. He asked if the DNF wishes to have Orono be a partner in something. regulS:iS!i:1asSedl7-^hR^^“yearago-\‘hey°:er;;%inS°g^ ■5SiStr%«ab^srST:on/'’%hf^ Jhoreland regulations. Bernhardson said that he would research the matter further. Mr. Gabriel Jabbour said that it was refreshing to see the rouncil moving forward n the issue of marina committees. He u?gSr the council to continue to be proactive, rather than reactive Mr. Jabbour suggested that Council may wish ^ Iterbeyond a marina commiltee by establishing ordinances "that ioSld provide teeth to bite into any regulations that may be mandated **. It was moved by Councilmember Nettles, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, that staf.- prepare the history of Orono Marina Committees and their dealing with issues beyond licensing. The memorandum should include iSISr-tio/ r.garding jurisdiction, past law suits /„c^n“^tHa°ed lontrol. .Council would use this information to assist process of appointing a marina committee as soon as possib . Motion9 Ayes-5, Nays-0, Motion passed. Thursday, May 3, 1990 as tt date for the reconvene of the 1990 Board of Review. Motion, Ayes-5, Nays-0, Motion passed. mi- SECRETARIAL EMPLOYMENT* __ _ , .It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded y Councilmember Peterson, to approve the employment of Lin ® secretary effective April 23, 1990 at a rate of $9,795 per hour (Level IV, Step 1). Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0, Motion passed. life--’'- 14 - *■ 9<os Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson .5‘ PrcMi: Date: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning 6 Zoning Administrator April 18, 1990 Subject: Commercial Marina Licenses 1990 - Issues Exhibit - Staff Memo 1/17/89 it i:i ■ Commercial Marina License Application renewals were mailed to each of the seven marina operations in early February. The status of applications received to date follows: 'tK Date Application Received Marina Fee Submitted Correct Fee 'ftt Aw. 2/12/90 2/28/90 3/1/90 3/2/90 4/13/90 Mtka Boat Works Windward North Shore Drive Gayles Smith Bay Maxwell Bay Crystal Bay Service $428.00 436.00 200.00 200.00 408.00 $428.00 436.00 200.OO-*- $2/boat unit 200.00+ $2/boat unit 358.00+ $50 late fee 200.00+ $2/boat unit/$50 late ft 200.00+ $2/boat unit/$50 late fi ■iit We have heard nothing from Crystal Bay Service, and note that their gas dock is mostly on dry land, hence there is some question whether they will be operating the gas dock this year. t'i We also have no application from "Maxwell Bay Marina" which we are advised Mr. Toberman has allowed to go back to its previous owner# Jim Dunn. Mr. Dunn has had contact with staff regarding opening for business this year, but has yet to make a formal application. m ><S-. It is clear that some of the marinas are in dire straits, and I would note that: iSi - Gayles Marina and North Shore Drive Marina only submitted the base applicatirn fee, indicating they were not sure how many slips they would want to license for 1990 due to minimal water depths at the docks. Both of these marinas have done dredging work in the last year. fi- 'm - Smith Bay Marina has yet to start construction of the new building and amenities that were approved in 1987. To date, we have merely seen reconstruction of the docks and sea wall, and installation of electric service but no real activity for about a year. S /AJhfcAT^ /^ 41 -to A Acnrr C/ ^TV ... . .f-.‘ . .. fcv. »'• Si:'# lltt-fel Mla/’iP''-' u-U •.. ?''SS;' : ■'sSH- ;!»£- ' ■: iil^' S‘.i'?i ■■ ■•. •‘S-V^, ■ -'^:a ./■ Commercial Marina Licenses 1990 - Issues April 18, 1990 Page 2 of 3 - Both Windward and Minnetonka Boat Works appear to have adequate water depths but negative advertising about Lake Minnetonka water levels have hai an impact on their slip rentals. The Boat Works has installed the new docks that were approved in 1989. Windward is currently working on final planning for the new replacement building on the Tanager Lake side which was approved as a phased development. - We have been made aware that t *ere is a residential property just east of Maxwell Bay Marina which was renting out slips in 1989. We will be checking this out, since that property would not appear to be within the current B~2 zone nor have a City Marina License. There are no other apparent land use changes since our last license review which occurred in 1988, apart from those you have specifically approved through commercial site plan reviews. In discussion with the LMCD, we have learned the following: - They also have heard nothing from Crystal Bev Service. - They are working Maxwell Bay Marina. on license/ownership change for - Their policy for partial licensing is "all or none"; _ A AS # a%._ _i.e. they won’t consider just licensing the usable slips. Issues that need some discussion include: 1. Does the City Council intend that marinas license aJLl of the slips that they have historically licensed, regardless of the availability of those slips? Will non-licensed slips in 1990 be grandfathered for future years? Remember our marina license fee structure has historically been based on numbers of slips, even though we haven ’t exerted any authority over those slips. 2. Given the fact that some of the marinas appear to be in financial trouble, does the Council wish to waive any portion of fees? 3. Does the Council wish to formally authorize and appoint a marina committee? bmm.- 4. What would be the responsibilities and the authority of that committee? ■.'i mm. Commercial Marina Licenses 1990 - Issues April 18, 1990 Page 3 of 3 Poes fhe Council wish to meet with the marina operators as a group to discuss the issues and concerns with marinas that are noted above? I-*' Op>tional Actions A. License Review Process 1. Form a marina committee to review applications. 2. Have only a staff review of 1990 license applications. 3. Table for further discussion. 4• Other. B. Fees Mi'- |;4 ■ w- ■.li' -V 1. Total fee based on historic slip counts. 2. Base fee plus only those proposed slips for 1990 season. 3. Base fee only (refund to those who paid slip fees). 4• Table• 5. Other. C. Options for Marinas Who Haven’t Applied ^ c ■ -x ' ■ 1. Staff to confirm marinas intent to not operate, or pursue late application. feS'-VT-- '■ ’ ■ ' ••• 2. other• Staff Becommendation - License review - Option 2 Fees “ Option 2 Hon-Applicants - Option 1 Mayor Grabek 6 Orono Council Members Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Forwarded recommending approval of a staff license review given that there are no apparent land use changes i ‘ .......................................... mi. hasn ’t approved or were made subsequent to the 1988 licensing. US'Simm V m '•S •:«r v.-S % A .* • f i 3 M A ■•^?.- "*;f/ 'irLM ’t:iiip' mi-v ■4 V-.J^ t.- V I:.. - ill Mi.' %4TO: FROH: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator June 18, 1992 %/ %I SOBJBCT: MnDOT Public Hearing Concerning Highway 12 MnDOT has scheduled a public hearing concerning the Highway 12 Scoping Document and Draft Scoping Decision Document for June 30. The Council may want to establish a worksession to discuss the City's participation in the hearing process. The Council may also want to discuss whether to mail a flyer advising all Orono residents about the hearing. !■' CVA .......ii ^ii‘m .ilil 1-; msiilfe mm.. . -^■' ■' • '‘-A • -iW#-.’-' ,4p".' r,v,.t:o7 r:Sfi;;:^.-3’S*t.IM: Pit?;; / TO: prom: DATE: SUBJECT Mayor and City Council Kon Moorse, City Administrator June 18, 1992 /A 1993 City Budget Development Schedule and Worksession I have attached a copy of the 1993 budget development schedule. The schedule includes a worksession on Monday, August 3 to review the preliminary budget. The Council may at this time establish the worksession. Council Action Requested: Motion to establish a worksession for review of the 1993 preliminary budget on Monday, Auqust 3 at p,m. in the City Council Chambers. wm:W0 Imm . ■ tA m ' ». ff !?% -*t.' ' .• •■ ■.A--' ' ■’■■4 V • ml PROPOSED CITY OF ORONO 1993 BUDGET CALENDAR Hay 26 June 22 July 3 July 13-17 July 24 August 3 August 10 August 24 September 1 November 15/ December 28 Budget packets distributed to all Departments. 1993 Budgets submitted by Departments. Budget Analysis completed. Department and Management Budget Meetinc s. Preliminary Budget to Council. Council budget worksession. Budget Introduced. Adoption of Proposed 1993 Budget and Levy. 1993 Budget and Levy submitted to County. Public Hearings on proposed budget and levy. Actual date will be set by County Auditor. w- i. ... v' ^>5- .V i : 'V,v' I-r-«. •t-‘> t-. ;•' • .]‘-V - 1 / Ot J$9^ % -^45S9 o o 1" i »: ; ■i rv.'‘ i? '-r., / . '.I • /;■ .' 'J'i I.s ;•/ • ,<'Vt .“ft *• 1':' • •v’M 4 ; ■:"* ' v ^ % « • . » «• * •<. > ■ v;;. ■:'i- 4 » -‘n. .•■, ,1 •■ •i . j' » \l.> tC :• »:• V*?<- V< • » « J fV *■ ’» \ * • ; . \ ^ • M» » i' •* 1 V ^ ••-if;.V ‘ LS- *. KT ^ ; / • * •* /• : . -Vt. •H P« ft j'^i’ V *k' ‘>* • ’'fw-'f »* -i. ••V^CV-'^v ‘S ■••'A;a’. r>‘. •,'.’^•1 '-X .V ■-.- ^ OA 01 otoraoooioioi li^UtOUIJbbJUIO U«H- ^N»ION>00 l*MOMIPOfDUlOk • K> MK» ^ 0» M oo WOi _ - ------ -■^-’'w.»—00t0C»K)0>O>-*N>0*hJ<OCn^»—CJ<l> m X tp "OO 3D r m <o Q IS) O 30*0 30 « % .V V 0>*nx«D<aom> mr*« >zm X *ni >3omomo m>c/)0 Cl "S LJ OI g Kt«o5-’"?^|p|i/,5o5^$^ooomS^'’c.$2oS ‘ ^ m xr* m 'o ^ "^5 ^ ^O C/) m ^ 5 umisjcjp^s5sssi55ssssssr;s2st;sc:i;2st;s2j:t;s^ssssst;:;2sst!t:s!:t;si; 2 M ^ P* P* P« to K>ClP«0bMOt ^ Ul CMSIO^OP^ID viO OhM^«DOIO<DOI . ^......................... »-rs> fs)fsi^ 5SSS2SS2SS52SS2SSt;SS£S2SSKSSSS.'._.„222S:2SSS£S5 S ►- I ^ I j O <7> CJ ^ O K-* ^ 'O 1-^ O D) H* »-• (O OP 01 fS> »-« O )rs)0>K)Ohv4<>4oiopco*-^ • • • • • __ p»- ^Ul«» t vi|DOI<^fD' n « •N I V 01 I• i »- • - , , . . ^ . • !5 • OMioro^iPUMo « in I W it'^oo>cnfooi • O I 9 • |***««««» n *4 I OtMOItOMfSMOl^ r, « il I OOiOiOOMiiootM « • ____ O*0U}OUt0»M«l u'o>N»oio»<o^i-<Doou)CA)toa»^-'^ooc7)tnoovio)tooois)jpoo)jPO>^aicjK)»—o«#v/)2ui«o i/>o "“".■'°.*“*?“3SSSt;t!t;SS32SSSSSSgSS££SSSS52gS5S2SS£S SS..................................... ..................................................................................................................................... Qri, SSg§£2Sg52SS3Sgt:g!:gi:2SggSSg5SSSSSS2g:SS3SgSSSS3 §; . •• . . *% T . . I. •'em } IV* ;'.i- , ►.. I • 'JO ‘ ‘ • ; ,t^ir r . N*., .V . • . ••W ■'•■■ ,:r ■'•■' •i :' VWft '' • • . ir.'i-.i4 i =.^ ‘ ; ■'<.' H'i ■ •’ >f4il i • «• I.' . • \rr ■'. •‘\m -. ■V ■ • ’»•■ ■ .'■ ■m-. f r,-T. ■ ■‘•vy. ' . ■ - T’. . !»■ * ’ -‘6,; V ki ' ... »f iti'fe. !Y-*j>-" •it-tt-.*' pi. 'm'- >■• V . ';:-.V •“■ •.- ■ .’ ",'C»'/*y,?, '^*^7 w ’ ■ If 0»OI ’VX. ID«I MN $om 2S VI ti » 5? fn 39' < KIO 9»M • f WM VMO I I I I » » » » » » » Io VI opoo OlSoKOI V«MIV«UI » J» » m m • ooooo m m w m • O CJ CO oo CJ U) ^ ^ 000 01 OI Cft • m m m • ^*-4 OO o ►— o O m oooooo M Nj N) ssoo ooooo 010 019101 ocn OI 010191 O0I10C0 ««0«0<DCD PS) fsl K) K) fsj 03 N) oo OOO oo o OOO91 91 91 9) 91 9»9>91 9)9)91 \ \ \W ►- ►—►—►—»—►— ►—•M •-» MM 91 91 9191 9>91 9>91 O) 9)91 W\ CD CD CO CO CO COCO OI CO CO CD PS)K)rsjpsjp^^J^J M fs)N)KJ m ’M«l 910 ^ M M UIV1 M VC LJ CJ CJ tJ tJ CD 01 M M ^ ^ O bJ ^ tk O C a ) CO tJ 9* 9^9) M 9»C0 9b M M • • ^99 VICO 91 • • • • « 9IMMMMM 09 99 9)0 9>9) N) KJ KJ 0019*OOOO MCC^^^NICD OMNINIKIfS)M M i/CM 9fc OOOO CO ONI • • NlfsJ OOOO9IUI1*199 VI ifl '>4 OOOOOO CD CD fOOM OOOO 9* 9199 MfSI OOOO »i»9 »9 9 9 1 9 w w«w w 9CX3K39stes •-CM 1-41-4 VIVIVIVI VIVIV) VI -^ooo JliMMM fill tJUIWUI UM4CJUI till WMMO OOMCD I • i • OOliJM UIMM^ VIVI ^ VIV)ooo ooSSSSi m > I^»i^IMMMr-r-r-r-r- zzzzzooooo VIVIVIVI m VI VIVIVIVIV) HH-H-H-H > VI VIn >>>39 ^cc mr-r*r-r--4OOmmr-r*r-Dc MM MMM Mmnim m mi VIVI VIVI OOO -CH >> Mzi5Smm39 30 m o09 01 OOO mm MM r-r-VIr-r->>>mm -<mm zzz OO VI no MMM •H-l •Hooo39 39 m Z X ^ ^ ^MM Xmm mm n r*r“OO ninini zzz HHH :« 39 30 3D 39 393939 30 30nifornnir^ VI Moz VI '0-0-0 mr“ m 3909 30xoz M M -43-f VICVI ODD GO OOO 2 Zo o VI V) •^OOOO O MMN)oo iJM MMM M 99 D>oia»ai MM 1 1 1 • 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 ^ D* J9 99 9*J9 99 CJVICJUIbl NI OO 09 L9UU/I 04 N> KIKIfSiKIKI U>OO N>N3N)19 u> MMMM M (*l NINI OOO 0909 f 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 VINI mOO N>ID VI MNI 0199^914*1 CD CO 09 09 09 Nl^ CD ID 99 CD CD CD M M <9^0 COCO 1 • 1 • 1 1 1 1 « 1 1 1 1 CO 99COM M 99 CD CO OOO 19 99 MNIUUDNJ NJ ^ 99 ooo MM N) I MMKI i I I CJ Kr I ui tJCJUl WUIUI I I Immui CO I CO I I I ID ID CO MOO 9 9 9 •9 9 9999•9 9 9m9m9999 1 1 1 1 1 1 1OoOooooXZX51DCVIVIVIVIVIV)VI mo 3D 30 •H 3DSD3D Mmmmmmm -hm -o r*zzz m >>m MMM X MM -p ^ ^ ^ 3D 3D X f-r-r- OQmr-m s VIoom8 •H Ms VI VI om o M -< 9 s § mo m O M VI I IS> INI C S tP Oni I 1 Tf' F'5;>''> W'kk- r-rTV L'-?' ■‘^ jfii'vr ,.-.■ ‘ ^i: Ml llv.p--' %feKf>i. '■. im M•Nl • m mm m UIWCPWUIUWWU) m m ►- »►-m »» 9 »-4 »4 m 44 »4 »••^ •m J9 0k »J*»•►-•^ •o m OO »o »>tJ •4 •«>•MO*»»l»o •Jk »09 •Cl'vt •CJ • 0 01 oooo O i» o o opooooooo cnpaidioia)0»oiai 9oioi0i'9ioiaioioi fDIDOCOCO fON)NI^^^J^J^JK>rsJ O O o O OO O oOIOI01OIOI OI OI OI'4 -N.4.w ►-1—►-* ►-•»-«CO 01 o OI OlOl OI o>V,V.-V wIDID«ID ID<0 ID IDKJhjMK>K) rsj KJ KJ OOOO >si IDOIDIQ KIN>IS> ISJ K- •—vu/l 4 4 »-* i>.; ID fr M Oh Kl UIU>^ UP MKIOOMDMOI^^20S.205.KPKJ OOOO UP UP ITT • IT002902►— ►— V'O .034.034.135.1351*0 OUP 44UP H> VI400CO S 0^ 09 OI O U* 01 4 O CD 2 m i/l UP psj CO ID 00 VI ID iH OO OO VI1/1 ID ID OO 6969M 00 cn fs}o«^6969Oldvun M04dUI CDCD VIDhO • o »»»»•**• •Ho M % oonnooono M M 1^4 M ^ *14 r^ ^1 n*i ni sssssssss Tl-w ^ ‘VO IP o <i4 ^414 Ci« C4 C4 C« €h Mo 1^mm »a?--_________f*i fO ifi fo ni ni p^i ni ni xxzzszzzz 4/1 (/}(/) o ►- » M *^'N4<siOOOOOO I • • I I • I I I #bjbak^ibaikjb«bC4 I fs> f (UP ui ui UP ui uiuiui m ^ ^J^JKI^P^J^JK>^P^J • • I I I I I I I UPUIUIM^^OOO <0CPIJbJb^K>0»CJO 0000^00 IDO I I • t I I I I I «DIDOJ^UIUI^k «0 WKi^roui^inisjo \:v. , :■■ M' » » to M-■.i> oo oor* oc o s o 8 > r- oo o > 30o r- CO 07 CC QO OO mm CO < > 01 30 m m m m l/MOI/M/l m m i/p > r- -0-0 30 30 •HM 8 -4 m 1$ 30303030 M8888 I ►4 2 (/> S Mzo -4-4 l4»-4 oo 8 -4 m O cn oo m 2 Q OOOO fom m ^1 mSmS mo VI CO 01 I/I fOo 04c^ -4 fO 2 U|2 VI 22 2mcO>OO o222r~V7VI-4 m H 44 2>>> oo ►4 2 VI oomm O 2 m 5mn >4 gSo m -4m VI >M>P- 583^^ M-0 M ►42r-2 o m o 30 Om vi< 2M Ct U4 M 2 O m -4 ►4 U4 mm ^ • M O ^3 f »•9 9 m m 9•9 9 9 m m 9»9 •9 m o 91 o 1 o 1o 1 o 1 O • O 1oPI2PC:k 2 2VIV)VI in in in in 2m VI VI om 1i ■ 1 4* ' ii 4 i o O 4 4 OO o KP 4 PD KP ISP > 1: 1 ►* 1 1 Oh K) 1 ►- K- 1 1 »— 1 J* CD • Oh KP VIVI Oh till i o- O H* N» 2 • CD »i«152-129-31I-* vjy »cn fO 9« 1 2 PO UP 1 VI 09 2 1 2 321-129-31321-129-31fSP UP CD 1 K) 2 1 Oh IM UP 0 VC 1 00 1 O O CD CD OD CD 2020 2222 till Oh 0*0^ CDOOOM moa^ lit! 2000 2000 4 3• •4 X _1..rf'S 1 ■J ■i •:.- ■ m m m » m m ►- • «4 * ^ • M • 1^ m M » KJK»^J U« ill ill c»dio» » » » » M dl m 9 » 9 f\} hj OS ID ID <PfO » » » m »00 • m m m 9 m Uli/I oo Vi v| • UltJ !-••— •— •— •— K>fS> COU> v4v4 OO viiii • • OIUI oo i/i CO(D rorsj «D <D ►- K> v| Jte iJ VI ►-* ‘. ■ • OO 9»Mcnoi OO fsirsj ISJfSJ ^ «>K»OO• •40 OO 9olD^iJ OO oo ooo OO OO)dot VI #•••O <r%oo OMfsO oo OO •^O vj OO OO OOO 400 o »•m m ••m »m »» p’% Kwt'i-^vV* ■■■■=•'* r »|pv' ?. itUn '* v" 4 Ife'' OOQ 0i4»-4Mxzz oooooo o 30 30 m o OO o oo►-4 OO -<cc 30 X <r-m VI V)r-r*•<g VI mm -4 rr*VI C -4 c mm H 2mmVIXOOm M -•4-4 ^ 10 m XX30mmomX X r-> >c 30 30 m O X X VI ►-4 *-4 X Q X5•4 on 00 X M .•4 ni X m V)VI XnVIVI<-4 o O o oo m m XX 30 M M m ►H >X X X O o o >o m c XXX O m C-. VI 03 c ^ ^ ^r*X cc m X ■X XXX >-4 r- T3 m m V.-4H-4 VI -<x X moVIVIVIVIamoccmmX X m mm X VI mvi (/> 55 yoM t/lin •-4 *H >99 H -n Mom v4 mm ?o?« i/>c "O Nl nt (/I o o 04 oo o O omUIKJmmVIm m 04 m 04m m m I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jib 04 ^J4 04 t4 Ob o»04 04 04 04 tJ Kirvfsj LJ o>U>M 00 M LJLJ M M K3 UI03CJ VI M O'-m M 04 |S LJ m X o cn m LJLJ M O 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •1 1 O VI VIM S-X oo Lfl m mo M M ID on^ ^M o VIVI X M XX 04 O 4DX40 X OS XX m X ox X X 1 1 1 •1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 XX Js LJ o mm X U>xm IS 04 MmM m o S9 S9 04 m CJ's4 IS)M » » f% MT'm ♦, .^sMmi'Mui n <m X 4D rn fsj o o »-4 8 o ^ O ooo o O OO O O OO o o >1 XXX X X XX X X XX X X -4 V.X X XX X X XX X X mmmmmmmm m m m mm m m X XXX X X XX at X XX X X X^x^X.X X XX X X XX X X X XXX X X XX X X XX X X fSI MMM M M MM K)M MM M M i mo mo M $/9 H f9 om VIo oo s l-l ^ I M O M I M VI •o > 0 s s »s s »s s X Q •s s •»9 s s s > m s s 9 s s S s s s o 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 m O O O O O O O O O Pf :x PI PC X PI X X X u>cn X X X X X T ■‘i ‘ffe' Mf r^. X=#Wa#-.. |f' I®#’feS-'" ■! •.-, ■; ' ‘ A’' •■• ■ ■U. ■ ;, -. life' ' 'V ■Lfe.lV'r. •:>»•. 5'. • '---'■ US'mm-m *, •;m:m.» -*t;4 , *-m-F - ^ r -. •N ■.-»• • i-. ' • /vir •. UJ w ID Ul i m os •4 -H i I I < 9 » 9 9 9 m Ui w m m • m 9 ^ ->4 CJUl oo 9 9 9 9 9 9 CJ O <o CJ o oo NJ <D U» » » » 9 9 ISI fOfO KlfSJK»N» uluiinui K> m ft O > <M ID M C|t»X X X X OO o o o o om m m >oo zzzz z XX z zz z Z Z -p "OP 8888 m CD XX m -<mm pp p p ID >>o o ID yom m -4-4 2 »-4 xxxz 3D OO z ID ID m m m m Z X z O -4-4 z ^ ^ ^1-4 -4 ID o -4 >>rr-f-r"zID ID -< X o >-H -4 -4-4-4 H om1-4 mm xxxxf-r*-4 Z o Ommyo H4 T>OQ M^MI-4 ID ID m m o zz zzzz> m ID -T'mm ooooOOIDm>-•OO OO O m >> •p a r-r- -4 r*r" s •Hm >m 9DID H H ID CD COm >m ID C -P •P w I l-l p ID C4 C^C|C4 CCCC m CD "n-prnm mm »-4K^»-4»-4 j!zaez IDI/}|DID 8 3^ ID C i-i H4zo § 31 I mmm K>o» ID o o O oo o o o o OO OOOO o O OI OI 91 0>0l 9)9)o>91 9)01 Z 01 9) 9)z z X.X*w ►-M •—►- ►-►—»—•—►-►- ►—K-K>» CD Dl Z 0)01 9> 9>o>9)9)9 ZZZZ z z >.'S.'N.V,.\V,\V**N»Kv. Vfc \ ID Z Z ZZ Z Z z Z zz ZZZZ z z KJ M fsi fsj fsl KJ KJ KJ KJ K)M K) KJ KJ fsj ISJ K> ■V4 • ►-H* • • ZID ZiJfs) ►- IDZ ISJKJ ►-K- ZZ WUJ KJ KJ KJK- tJDkZ KJ K- k^KJCDi-KJ IKZO tJZ KJKJ tJCJ KJKJ KJKJ 9909 (hi ZZ ZKJZ ID ID ►-K-KJKsI ID CD IDK- ^Zk«MOID -4^OO b zz zcn -4Z *4 OO ZUi UJCJ KJKJ OOO MOO ^CD ZZ OOoID ID OO IKZZ OO fsJM U)CJ •4 -4 OOO ZOOZM OO oo 9 9 D 9 >»9 *9 »9 > IH IDm os■n M o M OO M o -4 -4 ^•4 <4000 M omZM >-Dk K-C*J MM ^ K- b—Z •-* 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 till 1 1DuIkzDbDbDb#b Db ^ Jb z z z U»M CD ISJKJ M CJ M Z UJUl b-»b^b->K«ID IDotJMUJIS)K-ID CJ O oo ZCDZZ M IDmMOfSJl-o Z JK KJ zz ^O Z •1 C 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 till 1 t D»M MM O CD CD CDZ ZMK^b-z o DD M z Z 4i o CO Z Z Z^ZZ^M z u»o Z ZZ z O Z H-ZZ ozzz z z t 1 •I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 till •1owODb JK o ►-z z z z ZZMU)oo1—O MISJ o z KJ z |SJ>-CJfSJCJK^o M .................. o !Tm Oz o o 1-4 -Im Z om IDo 1-4 o § -I 8 ►- 1-4 •P b Xm CD o 1-4 -< o so mo mo 1-4 PI iS» KJ I »»»»j»9 »z o IK •9 »»9 ••> tn »•9 »9 W »»O f •1 I 1 •1 •moOoooooo 3C X 3(X X X X X ID z Z CD CD z z z z Q V-•m m m m » m » » » » Ul (D iT"' ■ rl i-. A. -if^' 1 ;■(' •s .0^■j- Sk. r..> |U- ■■ f;m. ":S j; .;•. * fi'i' -V •< v» i/>z m 19 > M m > U9 N> U« I t M I K> » » » » m tn M P'! I>' » » » Ia v> » » o I/) '■••1. i/• >• '■■■L 4i! o 0» «D ISJ myi X X UIUI fS»M Jb X 01 OIr• •• • (0(0 mm mm tf»tn KIM 1*1(0 »•» •<r*fn X »-4 r-rn m C/1 vr LP cr CP V.T L/1 OIA CH CPI 01(7} OI MMMKirohJKJ OOOOOOO (71OI OIO) O} OI OI CD (O (D <0 (O (O <D PJ rsj NJ M M f^) fsj M »— ^ «0 Jb ^ ^0b#»0* O* O WO(7»O*^O}P^J0« (/>(/)(/)(/)(/!(/) to 'O *P "D "O 'TJ “O ^ CCCCCCC »«||M l-Hb-l ^ 1^ l-« M >H 1-4 l-H bm-t »-| M *-0-« »H bH t-lrn (▼} rn rn rri rn to (O CO (/I (/) CO (/I CO II » » • O X (O » » » Io X to o CO «o M ^ ^>1 toco OO OO OO OO m -«oz X CJ Xo o -4 m O > o o •vi^^OOOO o►-Jb(OMb-bi«l—b—►- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1MlbXO(O (O to (0(0(0 toco totomMMMMMMMO bi«b-X X X X X X |b M•1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1oI—UKUUIMMb-O Oo(OOIXXX^IO XoXOXXOXUlXO111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1o(O (O tt (O OI lb CO b-►-o (O tOKih-b-hJ lb ^m totototocotococoto ^ ^ ^ «b ^ lb ^ Jb eeotcoMoooocooioi OOOOOOOOO (7)0)010101(71010101 (D(D«D(D(D(0(0(0(D PSJK)NJPSJMPSjrs;N)N) UM7MO (S) ^^CJIb b-'O^ISifDH-O^-NiOl |hCJMKiOlb-C7>J*b-«> tJ(D(DID«D(OH'0»CilOI XXXXXXXXXrn m m m m m mrnm illiilli mtum xxxxxxxm m m m m m m m rn CCCCCCCCC XXXXXX XXXxxxxxxxxx >-4l-4»HI-lb4bHb4bi4»-l mrnmmfnmmmm (/>(/l(/)(/>l/HO(/»C/U/> '^^^^•^OOOO ISibtJtJMMi— I t « I I I I I I KIKIKIfOroMMrsJM CJCJUItJtJCJtJtJtJ K7lbM^b-«bMIMb^ I I I I I I t I I tnUlC/ltni/lKIMb^KI (OaiOI|b^Jb«DK|(0 OIOID404DI004DO I •• I I I I I I CO4DID(OX^OIUI0I LjiSJMb-#—KJ»-***^b-* »b- b-^• m •m o (O»1* lb X •X »X to•UMJIC/I m o»»m M»^ |b X m to »n»OI (71X »tn •X O b-4 X Ho-< o 5? OOO O OOIX OI •H Sm » Io X (/) oi cn oi (0(0(0 MfOM >>> O GDCQ m m m XXX K4I-II-4 > » Io X o Ki X b- b— ISJ XX OOOO to to OO OO v4*^ OOOO MM OOOO (Ttn •» O b-l $ » » m • O X (/) 5c (71(71(01 to M X •H Mb«M o m UIX X i oHXOI■H o Q-4\X m QX XzM -H X •-• O m X s OOO O > b- b- )—b«O 1 1 1 (n ^ |b^0$oto (0(0 to cOOOb-XXXX--4 1 1 1 1 fsjb-o b-X«D«^CO to 5 0^(0 M • 1 1 I XtOH*to bH b-tOM M m O X Xm Q ►4 I/) Hm X o o» X • M O M I (O X M ^ X (/I >(/I o> mom f 0 ‘j 'I '1 I f i i1 iliilwm s-'j >- '.-.HiK ,' ,.m ks S' m:. N 0M •0J: l#c^ , i. i ^7: ’Mc^\ c ■ »m » 0»€9 0» iHi/im ^klkfk VI</IM •4H-4 ►^Ml-t UH/M/I MMM ISSS xaezccc » » » m 9 m » » » » OB U» 01 CJ yt 00 ISI OP ►- oPOOopoeoaoPOBOB u«tnLncncn</«uitn 000 0 0 0 0 00IOIOIOlo»Ol Ol Ol \ MMM M *-•►— OlOlDI o>Ol Ol Ol Ol •V.\Ns. «DO«l CO CO CD CD CDfSIMKIMISIrsjN)ISJ 00000000 cft €ii 01010) cn Oi 01 CDCOCO<(D(OCDCOCO K>K>K>lsjfsJK»rsjfsj m M >“►9 M 9 M•9 9 0 CD 9 JP 9 9 X CD 9 M'*<4 9 9 m M 9 CD CD 9 00 9 0 9 0101 9 CJ 9 X 0 Mz 0 -< 0 0 m 00 0 001 Ol •H 0wm% MM ►—0 0101 Ol 1\0COCO<0 Nirvj IS) CJCJ MfSJ M M K)'^M uifSIMCJCJS9 JO CJ CJ ^WMCnKlOOOOQODb ro ^cn ^ JO0000 • p « •• 9 coco 0101 ^ S9 cjuirsj^'^^-vl'^op CDM^D» JO oe 0000 MfS>MfsJ OP 00 00 OMiPOMOOOCD oc/icn MM 00000 1 mm Ol Ol 00 coco -n J OOrslN)CDMMM»->U|00 ^M cr»cr 0 W 9 •9 9 9 t •0 p 9 1^ O s c > < ►H s Qm < m to </) O O cccccccc (/>;/)(/) CO (/)(/)</)!/) cc COOO (/>C/)C/Y(/»OOCO mn Xm 8 ^00000000 •n ^ 00;o:sxwt/> Xmo co •H O m 00 oo o-n m < ?o O rr- MIH MK4 H-4mm OQ > 79 ■< X Mr-m >om ■D > ?0 -« CO mr*■D > X >>m>mrtimni CC m 1-4 ?o •TJOP 3Dco 88S8 MI-1mm 00 9D39 Os CO romfnm co Mo I/I 8 CO m X om Ui O M o mo X m O M </l Hni 009 0 0 0 MMM M M M M t t 1 I 1 1 1 JPMM Jo J^.JO Jo KIKIM CJ Kl CJ CJ Jo #0 Jo 00 CJ CJ 000 M JO M M 1 1 1 1 I I 1 MMM M U9 fsi M MKIM *sj JO Jp 0«MD Ob CD CD CD 1 1 •1 1 1 1 UCDCJ CJ CO Jp Jp MMM CJ M N)rsj tsj I |a» N) U1 I U1 ID I CD '^'W^OOOOO tJfsINiMMMMM t I I I I I f I UU)U>U)CJ CJCJCJ UiUIMU«KJK>Mrs> UIOIOUIOOOO I I I I I I I I U«VIU«O mmmm 01^ COIO<D«iUl«p<B«D I I I i I I I I COCDO mCJOIUIUI 0 01 I ISI M I ID M J p »0 pm»»p p 9 0 0 p » •1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 X X X X X ID «D ID CD ID O X CO » » p I O l/l » » » Io X </l CO C/I om Om •' 1 =; 00 0 MM M 0 ■1 1 1 1 0 Jo Jk Jb 0MfsiCJc MISI X MM M H 1 1 1 MM M X MfSJ M 5 ID CD ID 9 11 f 1 CJCJ CJ M MM M 5 .= fi i*- k;V ‘ e fj fi - Its. »,: ;■ !f. ■ 7-.V . Sfes: W:% ft -':v^ P't 10 m$.:0 .. V; Xo no o ID Ul oo ID<0 M fSJ ID O ID X Ou>o fOo xxxxxooooo ID ID ID (D^ OOOOO ••••Meet* ID ID ID ID ID X too M XXno to to oo 00 00 Xo to o oo r> SSi^gSSSSSSS lDtOIO.O«>«IDIDlD«>tO OOOCOOOOOC Zj coooeoooooc^wooooeooo t/iLT^ncnt/icnint/iuit/iu* 0 OO 0 0 OOOOO 0 0 0 001CD C o»0 O) 01 01 Dl 91 01 O) d»CD\ 0 OO 0 V. 0 ooooo 0 0 0 0►- ►-►-►-1 ►- 'V ID w. 010 to ID to to to 10 to CO to to toMMMMMMMMMMMM M OOOOOOOOOOO CT5CT>C7>a»0»0>0>0>(7)C7»0^ OOOOOOOOOOO tOCOtOiOIDtOtOtOlDlOtO Nl N> ►sJ N) N) ^ J N) fS^ K> ^ J N> 0 1 10(0 o M'n-n mm O M -4 Mm (O mm s <mm iiiii OOOOOmmmmm 'D-0*XJT)'0 > “TJ O mm •HH m fsi (0(0(0(0(0(0(01010(0(0 on OO 70 m O z z XZZZZZ2 7070 70 7010m m m mm <<<<<-Dm 0 1 C4C4cc mm O O 90 70 mmmmmm 10 > m m COm 2 0 >> >>>70 m D >0 "D m m m Ti m cc •jj 70 90 9D30^90Z m > CO CD 70 Ul (/I Ul (/I Ul (/I :o 70 m> m r-mr-f-'r- mm m m m 0 (/I (/I n m U) </l {/)(/) (/>Ul mm mm r“ CD CD mmmz>>>>> X X XXX o>1 • mm mmm-nmmmmmmm ooooonooonn >>>>>>>>>>> uMjiuiuuntoiOioioiocn ISJ Ni M K> M fS> K> fsj rs» N) 00 00 CD mr- OD 0(D 0 OO 0 0*-•-» ►-I—1 1 I 1 1 ►-M MC*l ulo 0 0UlownUl CD 010 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 MO 0 0UlCOO00IDCOO0011 1 1 1 M MO 0 0MMO00 ^^000 I I I I I fsJMOliJKl KIMUICHKi rsjfsj^- O K) K9KIDI ON> IIIII OOOOO OOOOO OOOOO IIIII OOOOOooooo ••4 <aI I KIM tnui I I Ulo» ID I ID M UlUl MM 00 1 I I to (D M •^^^OOOOOOOO I I I I I I I I I I I o»oo I I OO 00 M CO Ul I 01 Ul ^JM^JMMMMMMMM I t I I I I I I I • UIUIUIMMMM^OOO tDOll^Aet^^l^OICJM 0(D(DIOUIJIiUI^ID(DO I I I I I I I I I I I ID(DlDJbkltJiJtJ^»->^ (OMl^MUlLJl-»^-»U1fSJ^— •"I ID O 00 0 01 ID M «» m iTK/y «DID UlU^M M 0 0 O»^0t OU9M • • •037.037.wnui 00 Mcn 0 M ^ Ul ^ a> 00 OD wn Ul .356.356. 265 .2659 Ul ^ ^ U) <notoM^i-»»—uii—o*^c7i OtOO fktOOOOI-»»^IO01^CJ MM 00 00 0 0 000 000 wnwn MM tnui Ul wn 000000 000000 oe 30 OO 000 oon OO 00 • • • ■ . • • • *fcU)u?Ln^ocn(*i^coo»M CIOOOOOMUK-K-Ull-^OtO OM9I Ul wn■»»»m »»m m X l-lr- m > O m O ID O o o> ID M O 99 Ocz (/I 0 1 m O «>o 0 01 O «o M ID ID Old) 0* 09 00 ^ no 00 o Oz 0 01 o ►— to M UiUl ID ID U>U| UIUI 0101 cz 00 00 > c»' I m X om I/I O H Ms 0 0 M '* Mh-wn Ul 0f•1 1 0Ok0U)Ul Ul tn czotwnMMz ►-0)0 0 ■H1111 M 0 zMUlCO000toOo• 1 1 •1 Ul •—0 0UlM00 z <• •o b I 11 I I iiiii I ii i lllliililii i i i : iC >II ■; •'• i**,? r* zz ccccc >>>>> zc > f— z cc c >r* c > r- » » I o PC 1/1 CD CD Om to ID M O ♦H • 1i D > Om O 70 So 0 m O m Q •H ID -Hm O' 0 Ul 1 Ul I <0 M om isife,sms r" ■ v:(f^ I# "1.-Vif-i: •/>v J-- > ■i \ ms :ii-v L-> o 0 01 <o uo o -H > .5^ ■■ .- ;■ •■ ‘i 1. > .. ilfc; U'*- OMSJ 00 HkfsJKJU OiU) ^OU) tO0»«*OO UO MOW MOOO» -n-n-n-n-n CCCCCzzzxzooooo ^ ^ ^fs>0 ^ tJfSJ ooooo >>>>> Ot/>C03> tlf^ftl Qnt oooo C -TJ T) ^n%m ni>> Ot^M m > c6 *HZZ QOmz -<cc MZZzooo •n O «>«DID<O«0ZZZZIDtDooooooooooo ««>IDtO!DtO<Of01DIOZ O m m ta Oz o ooooooooooo Cfl9>0)0l00l0l0l0l0l9l ooooooooooo ZIDtOtDOCDtOIDVMOtO MfsjK)K>MlSJf\)N>K)fOK> OI M 0IOU1O ^i^MUjroofsj o (otD^ui^HiooH^oiPcnui o • • • oo ^ «T| «fi ^-n-n ^ »-4 IH M»-4 MM l»4 M MMoooooggoon* cnuitnmuKncnoMjiuvui rsJNIfOMfJKifOMMKJM MMMOooooooo I I I I I I I • I • • K)fOfSJN)rOKJK)IS}K)fSJN) I I I 1 I I I I • I • t/l ill Ul M rsj M M M M o O OOI«^U>^COMMMO)U> 0<D<DOu>uifkinMioa> I I I I I I I I I I I tJK>»-*MN>U1U)MMinK} : m m n I O Xu> iiiiiiimizzzzzzzzzzzccccccccccc: ' z ji*>>>>>>>>> o ^ H O m z O z o sc <m Oz mo rn O M%n Hm M m Z omo>oz M z -4 M 01 Mz < z o Ul M I C/l om om © ■jl © < 0 ^•' r.'f *r ^ :r. B' ''w t'f ., >; P;- 0 ip-: & f, '.•■ ■t ■ fj- .'l ' '■ W j( ■ ■■k<’r r:-' l.-* .* • V ik/%'0 !j'a >v, K C i'> m,. I.^ !L3? ti "3 a <f t:] r\ u^i C^c COUNCIL MEETING JUN 22 1992 CITV OF ORONO \ . V ' ^ Ip...H^#-:r*- '■mm.. Irr.m^. teIlf. pi'-S V-* V < fe4& -"'■v.' -• s® #6 r'/t'^i-p'*' i..N^i '^l- ^ ^ . . .r ::■ Mmk iR' Ifc Mp%. fV g&.'%^. ■ tj . , ■»* ■ .»?, I' ■ TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator June 17f 1992 SUBJECT: Stubbs Bay Sewer Project Assessment Appeals Attachments: Notices of Appeal A number of sewer assessment appeals were recently received from the Stubbs Bay area. The most significant includes all property owners from the Cygnet and Leaf area. Although the Cygnet and Leaf appeal also includes the Oxford residents, we an agreement with the Oxford residents. have reached '4> !• m mm. ■rt..W ‘u r, . ■ ;;>I f ir;:- i*'■ w .' «,’. ■--? -k m ' i .• • .'Vi-:' ■■*: ■'X • v •'■ P. ;frV' ;.-vv ■ ■fe- • ; • • i r> ;• V y‘ -ihiriVp - •-mu: ■f: ■ ?■ ■«l STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN i ©31^3 yM 1 61992 IN DISTRICT COURT ly 'OURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Case Type: Other Civil Charles A. Balgaard, Appellant, Court File No. vs. city of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation, NOTICE OF APPEAL OF ASSESSMENT Respondent. TO: JACK PROVOS. HENNEPIN COUNTY DISTRICT COURT ADMIN7NSTRATOR, AND DOROTHY M. HALLIN, CITY CLERK, CITY OF ORONO. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the appellant, Charles A. Balgaard, hereby appeals to the above-named District Court from the special assessment adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on May 18, 1992. in connection with the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project. This appeal is from the assessment in the amount of $0840.00, more or less, against the following described land owned by the appellant: 3435 East Lake Street PIDI 05-117-23-13-0039, .... Lot 2, Block 8, Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. The nature of the appellant’s claim is, and the grounds for this appeal are, that the subject property will not receive a special benefit from the improvement being constructed; that the amount of the assessment is greatly disproportionate to any resulting increase in the market value of the land; that the proportionate distribution of the improvement's coats among property owners is unequal, illegal, and unfair; that the assessment procedure was illegal, improper, unfair, and ■5 "i my$»- #? tr- •' ■'. ^ ^'- .'.'it'' •' l."vV “w^ . -i * F( i! V > U ‘■••! ■^V s- u--$ > I/.. ft? % irregular; and that the assessement is unfair, unreasonable, unconstitutional, arbitrary, and capricious. WHEREFORE, appellant prays the Court for an Order directing the City of Orono to reassess appellant's property consistently with appellant's claims in this action; to award appellant his costs, disbursements, expenses, and attorneys' fees; and for such other and further relief as the Court deems just and equitable. Dated: June 16, 1992 Jl CTf<^k- [lUcl^iu Jaclc vi^ren - 112847 Attorney for Appellants 5249 Main Street East Maple Plain, MN 55359 479-2090 ACKNOWLEDGMENT The undersigned hereby acknowledges that costs, disbursements, and reasonable attorney and witness fees may be awarded pursuant to M.S. §549.21, Subd. 2, to the party against whom the allegations in this pleading are asserted. ! Cr<L\<L\MJack Vigoren w ■ • . fc.... fct•X: m: { ■ i m Wy ¥#• m mii- m.:- ADMISSION OF SEFWirR 1 acknowledge and admit that I rf*rif»ved a copy of the Notice of Appeal of Assessment ^rom Jack Vigoren on this day of . 1992. Dorothy M. Ha 11 in City Clerk City of Orono Subscribed and acknowledged before me by Dorothy M. Hall in. City Clerk, City of Orono, this _ _ _ _day of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, 1992. (Notary Public. If-- w ,#m-M r<- §^7 ^17 B ^- V'- f':. *'■ '.. • ■•;- ’ ■'! Wk-m¥ .i mm ^ky W'p'y:- ■r.- -ifr# .,=si ' ' ' I- t' & k^m.k':m- *kj <■:.:* ■ ; ‘V iSj MICHAEL KNIGHT ATTORNEY AT LAW 730 EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA MINNESOTA 55391 TELEPHONE (6I2) 475 1515 FAX (612) 475-0311 JUN 1 5 June 12, 1992 Ms. Barbara Peterson, Mayor Ms. Dorothy Hallin, City Clerk City of Otono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Hand Delivered Re: Bayside Homeowner ’s Association Appeal of Proposed Assessment Stubbs Bay Sanitary Sewer Projen Dear Ms. Peterson and Ms. Hallin: Please find enclosed and served upon you by personal messenger the Notice of App<»j of Petitioners in the above-entitled matter. It is our desire to continue to work with the City to reach an amicable solution to this matter. My clients will be in touch with City officials in an effort to reach a settlement. Please feel free to contact my office if you have any questions. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very Truly Yours, Michael Knight ^ MK/Ikb Enclosure cc: Thomas J. Barrett, Esq, City of Orono T*'' ; KaMiikiiiaiiiL .: -7^ 1^. V” f r-. •.^i^ % r;^>- y W-u yr..yr y\ i.*f ^i. n^€.'' "‘);M ’- 0:: >v'‘ X '<pi ®V- , • \/ •'w- STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN DISTRICT COURT FOURTH Jin)IClAL DISTRICT Case Type: Other Civil Court File No.________ Bajside Homeowners Association, and Aodersoii, Hakan and Elizabeth Moriahey Behnnas, Leigh and Jane Bellamy, Grfleen and Louis Bloemendaal, Arthur E. and Cleo A. Brownlee, James S. and Lois Calvin Ptesbyterian Church and Dennis Anderson Crane, Pat and Leslie, Jr. Cuim, Donald and Margaret Dale, Michael and Marcie DeMeo, Joseph and Victenia Deieriing, Eugene C. and Fausta Ehalt, Brian G. and Barbara J. Ehalt, Gregory and Rosemary, Hacher, Ami and Joe Fudmer, Henry and Elaine Hall, Shirley and Jerry Ikrfinnan, Ronald and Robin Kelly, Richard L. and Gay C. IQitii^ Loren and Corky Koepke, Diane L. Levering, William D. Lutz, Thomas P. and Mary Lou McCoy, John McLanghUn* Michael C. and Constance B. NOTICE OF APPEAL OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ^**%,^Molfa.De««ndVd i m I f: Nelsoii, Albin and Susan Pamial^ Harold J. Petaaoa, Melvin J. and Ollie PkovOb Robert J. and Marjorie G Rhame, Carl and Andrea f, Margaret ■0^- , y 4:-V-.: mm. m L-’-.l £Lk,^C^.. m, i? 1 P ’*.>•* i * • * W:-" m‘’irrV-t5»-,.- IMffcp:-?..w.-- :«'• %■ S2'- -*:’. 'V',^ ;: V’» Hi# i ? ■■lf'f-‘5'' '-V mi 1^, St. Lawrence, Frank O. and Kathleen A Shaw, Janet and F. Dennison Stockton. Harlan O. Vitko, Paul and Ami, Petitioners, V. City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation. Respondam. TO: Mayor Barbara Peterson, uiid City Clerk, Dorothy Hallin for the City of Orono, Minnesota. PLEASE TAKE NOTICF that Petitioners, and each of them, appeal from the Proposed Assesiment for the Stubbs Bay Sanitary Sewer Project (hereinafter "the Project") as adopted by Respondant on May 18, 1992. As and for their Appeal herein. Petitioners state and allege as follows: That the Petitioners are the owners of the following real estate: M iili PROPERTY ADDRESS Kathxyn A. Anderson Hakan Anderson and Elizabeth Meviarity Leigh and Jane Behrmas Colleen and Louis Bellamy Arthur E. and Qeo A. Bloemendaal James S. and Lois M. Brownlee Calvin Presbyterian Church Ledie P. and Pat A. Crane Donald and Margaret Currier Miduel and Marcie Dale Josqrti and Victoria DeMeo Eugene C. and Fausta Deterling '* V . ■ ■ ■ 398 Leaf Street, Orono, MN 55356 135 Cygnet Place, Orono, MN 55356 340 Leaf Street, Orono, MN 55356 200 Leaf Street, Orono, MN 55356 145 Cygnet Place, Orono, MN 55356 250 Cygnet Place, Orono, MN 55356 185 Cygnet Place, Orono, MN 55356 285 Leaf Street, Orono, MN 55356 60 Cygnet Place, Orono, MN 55356 261 Q'gnet Place, Orono, MN 55356 400 O^oid Road, Orono, MN 55356 240 Cygnet Place, Orono, MN 55356 ■ j- wAvv-;m r ■ IS . , ' r- >■ i ■ c.- 5^.' i-,4 ]v- •i- t--- U‘ V:M ■r v'::v. 'A f ? : - ■ ■•- i- ■ - '' ■■ fr'j',*- Sfev ' i’^• tt■7^'If?-:fc fP«-‘ Pi |rf? imw ; pV mtWv' • ^ r»“' Is"^'' ^h.- ^‘■1 * mm Brian G. and Barbara J. Ehalt Gregory and Rosemary Ehalt 7. Joe and Ami Fischer Henry and Elaine Furchner Shirley and Jerry Hall Ronald and Robin Hohmian Richard L. and Gay C. Kelly Loren and Ccwlcy IGiizke Diane L. Koepke William D. Levering Thomas P. and Mary Lou Lutz John McCoy Michael and Constance B. McLaughlin Dean and Val MoUn Albin and Susan Nelson Harold J. Panuska Roben J. and Marjorie G. Provo Carl and Andrea Rhame Margaret D. Rossing and Gerry Clark Frank O. and Kathleen A. St. Lawrence F. Dennison and Janet Shaw Haiian O. Stockton Paul and Ami Vitko 140 L-caf Street, Orono, MN 55356 85 Cygnet Place and 105 Cy?nei Place. Orono, MN 55356 25 Cygnet Place, Orono, MN 55356 360 Leaf Street, Orono MN 55356 80 Leaf Street, Orono, MN 55356 190 Cygnet Place, Orono, MN 55356 425 Oxford Road, Orono, MN 55356 555 Oxford Road, Orono, MN 55356 65 Cygnet Place, Orono, MN 55356 3180 Ridgewood Circle, Orono, MN 55356 258 Cygnet Place, Orono, MN 553' 565 Leaf Street, Orono, MN 55356 180 Leaf Street, Orono, MN 55356 248 Cygnet Place, Orono, MN 55356 500 Oxford Road, Orono, MN 55356 20 Cygnet Place, Orono, MN 55356 220 Cygnet Place, Orono, MN 55356 3245 Watertown Road, Orono, MN 55356 130 Cygnet Place, Crono, MN 55356 253 Cygnet Place, Orono, MN 55356 405 Oxford Road, Orono, MN 55356 265 Leaf Street, Orono, MN 55356 80 Cygnet Place, Orono, MN 55356 That the "Bayside Homeowners Association" consists cf the above-named individual Petitior.ers and has been formed to prosecute their joint appeal efforts. Tliat Petitioners, and each of them, arc aggreived within the meaning jf Minnesota Statute Section 429.081, by the adoption of the resolution by Respondant levying an as.':''ssment on the property owned by Petitioners, and each of them, for the Project. wm fef' * W .-A ^1' ^ > - -_- •-......•*- • .A’ • A •FV '■ • ■" .i.,M -<►. ' '»«■' 'S-t ^ ?. '.»T;^* "T-'r^/'4^ ■ ' ' ♦-!i;;:El^?■> p I..'V'. 1;.. <1' 1rv: fi^ ■* S^'I"' ¥■fe.r t. %' % f'- f- ??'; ‘tP- E" ■A^. ■'' P-' • '• ^Vi,.^ .. ‘Aj;.'. : ,i'-;rf ■■■ ^ - :.1 ■■' ■. r. • • '. ,*i *• »P*. ?W;yp.^s ^ P'*P ’; ;.-f;x'rt '* ■ ■. :'^o'*' - ■ Vif.-r-!', f,.AN'^'' • i^l W. : v; P ipv i;#m--m: - ■ BV' &;•> Mr--- m:p^- IV. That Petitioners, and each of them, have filed wrinen objections to the proposed assessment with the City Clerk, Mayor and City Administrator on or before the date of the resolution adopting the assessment. V. That said assessments exceed the special benefit, if any, which will accrue to or will be conferred upon the property of Petitioners, and each of them, as a result of the public improvements proposed to be made by Respondani. VI. That said assessments arc not uniform upon the same class of property, and constitute a taking without just compensation within the meaning of the Minnesota Constitution, Article X, Section I. VII. That the assessments are not proportionate to the special benefits received, if any, by each landowner in the Project vin. That there is no relationship between the amount of the proposed assessment and the change in maxlcet value of the property of Petitioners. IX. That the engineering data used to calculate and support Respondant s proposed assessment roll is inaccurate and not a proper basis for determining the area actually benefitted by the Project X. That the resolution adopting the the assessment was and is procedurally deficient, irregular, improper and invalid as a matter of law. XL That the rcsolution(s) adopting the Project for which assessments arc being sought by Respondam, as well as the Project as currently proposed by Respondant, were and arc lurally deficient, irregular, improper and invalid as a matter of law. W'h WHEREFORE, Petitioners, and each of them, pray for Judgement by this Court setting aside the assessment levied by Respondant and awarding to Petitioners, and each of them, their costs and disbursements herein. gfif Dated; ^ - ' ■ Michael V. Knight (#l'71888^ 730 East Lake Street Wayzata, MN 55391 r612) 475-1515 A * C1NEY FOR APPELLANTS msy ACKNOWLEDGMENT mm The undersigned hereby acknowledges that (xists, disbursements, and reasonable attorneys fees a nd witness fees may be awarded Pursuant to Mirui. Stat Sec. 549.21 to the party against whom the allegations in this pleading arc asserted if this action is brought in bad faith. Dated: N ■ Kt ' * I - Michael V. Kni^t Atttwncy at Law mmim I1 4 ,1, ' I'TI#'1#'7:T7 ?tr%.f STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN IN DISTRICT COURT JUN 1 5 • • • • FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Case Type: Other Civil Wc'- m U- ife -. m-m-Ife' "-•r ■■' 4j-' . mim'- S»<'cV 51 ^:• r At. ■ = •^- - ■ Pir\^.^v‘" .. P^'fe^'v. Ptv .. iil^'flM': A1 Balgaard and Beatrice Balgaard, Appellants, vs. Court File No. NOTICE OF APPEAL OF ASSESSMENT City of Orono, a Minnesota munici' 1 corporation. Respondent. TO: JACK PROVS. HENNEPIN COUNTY DISTRICT COURT ADMININSTRATOR, AND DOROTHY M. HALLIN, CITY CLERK, CITY OF ORONO. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the appellants, Al and Beatrice Balgaard, hereby appeal to the above-named Dist *ict Court from the special assessment adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on May 18, 1992, in connection with the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project. This appeal is from the assessment in the amount of $12,990.00, more or less, against the following described land owned by the appellant: 3560 Bayside Road PID# 05-117-23-13-0017. The nature of the appellants' claim is, and the grounds for this.appeal are, that the subject property will not receive a special benefit from the improvement being constructed; that the amount of the assessment is greatly disproportionate to any resulting increase in the market value of the land; that the # proportionate distribution of the improvement's costs among property owners is unequal, illegal, and unfair; that the assessment procedure was illegal, improper, unfair, and iii'i^egular; and that the assessement is unfair, unreasonable, iPl# ysjf'">?/••'w^mrn.-.' »?VU A 4 i it ■ > m.%. unconstitutional, arbitrary, and capricious. WHEREFORE, appellants pray the Court for an Order directing the City of Orono to reassess appellants* property consistently with appellants' claims in this action; to award appellants their costs* disbursements, expenses, and attorneys' fees; and for such other and further relief as the Court deems just and equitable. Dated: June 15, 1992 Jack Vigoren -112847 Attorney for Appellants 5249 Main Street East Maple Plain, MN 55359 X" ■■■■■ S-r.'- 479-2090 ACKNOWLEDGMENT The undersigned hereby acknowledges that costs, disbursements, and reasonable attorney and witness fees may be I SSi’ awarded pursuant to M.S. S549.21, Subd. 2, to the party against whom -he allegations in this pleading are asserted. /5/ T/hsL \it4ct€l^ Jack Vigoren 4 i iiiV'IK-- • ■J. T- V V.i ^W,s-- A';'.: J 4 ADMISSION OF SERVICE ..t I acknowledge and admit that I rec^eved a copy of the Notice d£ Appeal of Assessment Jack Vigoren oalthis of _ _ _ _ _. 1992^^day m ■S4<‘r - ^thy M.^tk[J 11 in v> City Clerk ^ City of OroKo \0. ■ Subscribed and acknowledged before me by Dorothy M. Mailing /City Clerk, City of Orono, this /S^ day of OcvXJCT_ _ _, 1992. Noiary Public. -M pm '■ vv :t. -d; ■■ teisji' ^ • Sfmfr .:' * ' ■- V,- ■',-Vrif. . / f*> - 't.•as--- ilia...a ■ o ‘V^ ■' iV / • r i.’ls a 'I M 'J ___* *f .V;' .j; m 4'^-'.;’iiI ptt.'-fe's.r; Wf''/'. v -r' ’* • •^siimmf PI '^- ilA'-.c:-?-^'-' ' ‘r “MICHAEL KNIGHT attorney at law m east lake street WAYZATA. MINNESOTA 55391 TELEPHONE (612) 475-1515 FAX (612) 475-0311 JUN 1 5 ^ f. Ji AA4 June 15, 1992 Ms. Barbara Peterson, Mayor Ms. Dorothy Hallin, City Clerk City of Oiono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Hand Delivered tie: Lee and Juletta Harren ’s Appeal of Proposed Assessment Stubbs Bay Sanitary Sewer Project Dear Ms. Peterson and Ms. Hallin: Please find enclosed and served upon you by perso.ial messenger the Notice of Appeal of Petitioner in the above-entitled matter. Mr. and Ms. Harren would like to continue to work with the City to reach an amicable solution to this matter. My clients will be in touch with City officials in an effort to reach a settlement. Please feel free to contact my office if you have any questions. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very Truly Yours, Michael Knight MK/lkb Enclosure cc: Thomas J. Barrett, Esq. City of Orono A,. m 1 -4 J .2 itf .t \ -r»-r •: ! ■ 's&'jif-n,® P£51:’' Mi tf<-^ SiS: *■; «•' i“. :. v J-‘ «§-.■ ' v Vw 4 . fe-'* ■ V-i H#^WiW:i^^ STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Case Type: Oihcr Civil Court File No.________ Lee and Juletta Harren, Petitioner, V. City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation. Respondent. TO: Mayor Barbara Peterson, and City Clerk, Dorothy Hallin for the City of Orono, MHinesoCa. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Petitioners appeal from the Proposed I Assessment for the Stubbs Bay Sanitary Sewer Project (hereinafter "the Project ) as adopted by Respondent on May 18, 1992. As and for their Appeal herein, Peiiiioncrs state and allege as follows: I. That the Petitioners are the owners of the following real estate: 175 Landmark Drive, L(Mig Lake, MN 55356. Property Identification Number: 05-117-23 22 0011 ^4 £'t1T- Jr ■ ^ . ■A?r ?A mmM'- That Petitioners are aggrieved within the meaning of Minnesota Statute Section 429.801, by the adoption of the resolution by Respondent levying an assessment on the property owned by Petitioners, for the Project 1 r. 4 H ||K“ &liBi K'--: M- it"it,,. Ki,.: ''■iiv. &B m'MUi ' m slsftV.:-liWs^ ;-; . ^ MM Mi&nm in. That Petitioners, have filed written objections to the proposed assessment with the City Clerk, Mayor and City Administrator on or before the date of the resolution adopting the assessment IV. That said assessments exceed the special benefit if any, which will accrue to or will be confer^ upon the property of Petitioners, as a result of the public improvements proposed to be made by Respondent. V. That said assessments arc not uniform upon the same class of property, and constitute a taking without just compensation within the meaning of the Minnesota Constitution, Article X, Section I. VI. That the assessments are not proportionate to the special benefits received, if any, by each landowner in the Project. VIL That there is no relationship between the amount of the proposed assessment and the I-; change in market value of the property of Petitioners. vra.Iff mM:-- . - jvi' inaccurate amt not a proper basis for determining the area actually benefitted by the ' That the ci neering data used to calculate and support Respondent s proposed assessment I'C..mm— •'"v & I' 4fri r#vr. ■H m ■‘TJ3 li *•.'5 l'/ £i a : lift; "|i^ill m^ir- L -V*^' ; *s••■ •'• IS' •^l' i|pr\ - fe&s. fe;% feP 'ft ' V ';» «. | . >Sr, l.vj/.,' ftisfl" ':pfe. ft PfcSrft>' S-"ft•' '“*[:;.**■ ~ *' ft SiVpt"#ifftt Project. IX. 4 That the resolution adopting the the assessment was and is procedurally deficient, irregular, improper and invalid as a matter of law. X. That the resolution(s) adopting the Project for which assessments are being sought by Respondent, as well as the Project as currently proposed by Respondent, were and are procedurally deficient, irregular, improper and invalid as a matter of law. WHEREFORE, Petitioners, pray for Judgement by this Coun setting aside the assessment levied by Respondent and awarding to Petitioners, their costs and disbursements herein.i Dated; Michael V. Knight (#!718: 730 East Lake Street Wayzata, MN 55391 (612) 475-1515 ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS ACKNOWLEDGMENT The undersigned hereby acknowledges that costs, disbursements, and reasonable attorneys fees and witness fees may be awarded Pursuant to Minn. Stat. Sec. 549.21 to the party against whom the allegati<ms in this pleading are asserted if this action is brought in bad faith. Dated Michael V. Knight Attorney at Law hMM < ; • ■•s' •' A j ’ • '<■■ ' M,-‘^r SAMBORSKl Law OFFICE Anomey and Counselor at Law 18300 Mmnetooka BK'd • Suite 112 Wa)^U. MN 55391 612449-0262 if»'[1^mm.Jun# 17, 1992 Hmvor Bapb»r* Peterson City o*f Crono Muntclpi’ Su5^d‘r9 P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, 5?323-00oo Re* Gronbero ms. Citv o+ Orono lU'-'cr Peterson; m -'Fieate 6lnd enclosed and serued MOon vou by messenQsr the -fallowing* i 1. Amended Notice ot Appeal ot Assessment Pursuant to Sincerely, HInn. Stat. 429.091 ..Wi''teKJiisf. ven C. Samborski ms«r V'*"i i: :■* Attorney and Counselor at Law SCS/J s Eftcl osures mm :?: .-W* liilf *!■: kim x: X-.V W-v •■( '1 ■ Vi .X< ■I 4 i ..I j 1 ■>< 1 •-: i^iP®v, v. ■W- .... ■ ■■ c—4iT rr ^ j*.. -• *<?■! v:’^:^># rZ-.'^r^ :<jz I: I-- : : =“-::" t>»o. 10, ’=?£<:•;-- ‘^•= = i = ?-E‘.T. •:“-£ = ;te,;.' . r'/if* ^ .Do^»*.d Gr5 ”i*r5 ?!■- Grrnc«'i. i=.:r f j • t f , %|sfe,S& ■ • • *?• , -»JSil^ ^ 'c+ C'-rT.c, AW&40ED NO"ICE OF AC^C'EAl op ASSES3t<£NT PURSLlAr.7 MINT>I. STAT. 42^.0ei ?■? i: o* ;*r r . ^V-' ■ ■ ■ ■ ^ . ,^"i'' ' .. . ^ >^fTmKi% JTOi r'>/or o-f ••*«• Cit» c-^ Or c<r o t fVjntciC'?’ 0^^'i:«>«. Fci*. ' 0'^‘ftrf £!?'• , C“-yfti* £}>•'. ^'• nr.*? ct » ?'i2 :-C j6-r-. I liP'l? 7 iesikl t^t is«e5«?r»»nt i=o- the f>nii;j-»' «*■»- truhV- •**»--•m }-‘C ;rr-OM*n#rt. ;‘ ■ ^v; Ac9#?**htf it»tf and eiMegie the toHouMn^: . 'V.I.-pee 1.1 the •fttfi'rert c* the i-eniter* Hf'Mtj tr-.oV' lifid »>’‘ert1 ■ m: OMer^e’*'t , ti.e. StubD? Es» £»-.tj-'’ Sewer- rrrject', idcrtec ;h Ms,' :£. 1*'2. r MI r.n £ 1 1. *.. 42^* .0:1 . ^iilP ‘mmB i 2. Aooellanti, ere the cimers o-f » certiin c-*»'c*1 c* prccertv which hee a Property ID r-:-. c *' 04-117-23-22-000?, end street address o+ 110 Lee*? Street, loceted in the City o-f Or one, Cojntv Henr.ep i n. 3. The eeseisment hearing -for the sanitary sewer trur> and lateral improvement, which included the subject property, was originally scheduled ^or May 4, 19*2, However, it was continued and rescheduled -tor May 25. 1992. 4. For on or about April 29, 1992, appellants sent written objection to respondent. 5, On or about May 18, 1992, respondent -formally ted an assessment on the subject property in the -amount ,o^ •18,880. >/« "Bv -'■ iia'-- . .* N-;..1 i 'I 4 .'1.71 ■I •»., .*■ ,:il H- ,^i •. • o. ■5.^1 d n.'^si-'sr* C- t--* 5jr-*ct crc:^-t- s . * ’ f M t * • • o * ? ’1 • r ^ r # C w • ^ r *■ t 5 O t i*?t. ^n3 II r.:t irSrr te-.%t't= t- f-r :- -‘ r „tv'-- .«... ^ im-y. c ■ '* '■. I^^. “'r- ■ U.»^E‘= t-C®E . c - * -r»r:t«ct t'*' •^c’lo nc •’«' «•* f .ir, %'■ •' . • • i A. Court f«t iS C* f r**”! S-*--. t •rd f--r ?* * i-.-?' * i t ) ot’J«r 1 «*•«’ 1 . Wi 5, ai.r • - s r : . r r ^ r ^ - It df^^i .’ ii r 2 t 2 - s'*. I jfc r • * 2r •*- I *• * & . ? Z : r • • 0*t*d: /*7 • A^ 9*; ^wm.. JR" te':-' >' ♦ r •. • i S"^' t f * Httcrr.*. :.:•. «2-:-'-:r «1 1 c r n ft •- -^ ■ r ^ ‘ c" ' = iSiCt- f''' not tc"'*-? £■'•!. Su * tft 112 D€*rh*'‘»n, M*''! *53*1 T*i*?hon?: ■'•■ 1 2^- ■ ■■ I-'-.- f ;• •-:^■•?»•-• .• ■' :. , 'Th# C*irty r#pr#*^ri bv tti€ urd©rsiCTt#c 2» ?tu’'f ♦'“•♦r ti. .rr r6a-s:r>:’« tv^n#/ tra f^ts: <«■?? fc'? •‘■<srd*c t'l* c:: :• s n p*rty or o».rti«i, pursuant to M i r r. . S t a t : en .S-iSubdivision 2. O.Udi ^-/7- 9 Z- *'^en C. S^amDorSt- -A ,jp’.%^ •• '"■ ■ ^.' :r*.'x£. . - '* ■ Rpi»i'.* :•“ gv '•l ' .y; |#p.-a.•:..■■ m <1 r i % ■■A ••— Hr .• ' -^-*r ■. i .^Vv •*> I m v> 2 e W **h ><A.w^405- 1?^ .^■> cCti6 o 5 •^2_—LX—1X5'^ 0*^ ' "S oc »0o •>r 3 '4 ) I ' *T? 1.. ^ Lji > y IZ^ JUN i Ct----V "Tm C*^ Cv{nCV^-^ 1992 jl. o^a<^ , >Ur^ krcy^ ii}^ va A^-t^ cil. OIG^£4<4A-k^^ Co^o^ ^LJ zJ" />-w • .^trr^ /UaJUj^ I,^/r*v C0<^ juk oA*-^ crt^Si jLk^ jP y^ yt^ y^^xJLx Q^ /^J r*-^^ Cl AU-wyCV ♦ - -> 1^ A*y r*-^^ ^ «^A*o- <K ptoW iA-t—/fcfcv<l.^ CoQ^ ,./L.tfc.j-W-s ■ lL-> CW. Ck" , i~d <x5^ cX®^ |juA JUA oi^M^S jL< ^ Mj( ' ‘ " >■p;5 £ -5'E« ^ ^^riO£E |^oetl€Rs X2X ^£t>eftig. loioc 4jvk,c xs:isc --------------- 5.: ^75-n?o !«r^. •*->„ 'i •' ■' '»:L ? ■“*• P:: k-\:^‘,.' . ■ste IM-' ' fci ‘iir Ifcr-1^ ■ ;’.(V!' ■ ■:P? 3. :f;>- ^ ? V- • '«• ‘ si!? 'ite ' • ■'”' ' ■' K» Ii&:.. .-4/1' MISBEIiAHA CREEK MATERSKED DISTRICT board of NAHAGERS >♦ > H Thursday, June 18, 1992 Ifayzata City Hall 7:30 p.m 1. gall to order: note attendaacfl. 2. Anororal of Aoendi. 1«___ _ HfT MectinsL 4. Haartna of Perait APPlicatiODfl- A.________ ilieatieii HQ. 91-1111: Applicant: Methodist Hospital 6500 Excelsior Blvd. St. Louis Park, MN 55426 City o£ St. Louis Park, Sec. 20AD, Minnehaha StorsMater management plan for an addition to Methodist Hospital. Location: purpose: B. Applicant: ■O, >Z=afl: Location: Purpose: L 6 M Properties 953 Mississippi Street Fridley, MB 55432 City of Shorewood, Sec. 32BB Storaavater management plan for an 11-lot single family residential subdivision south of Edgewood Dr. and west of Oak Ridge Cir. called "Boulder Ridge Estates." C. Applicant: Location: Purpose: ilication Ho- 92-58: MnDOT 2055 Borth Lilac Drive Golden Valley, MB 55422 City of Minnetonka, Sec. 8CC, Wayzata Bay, Lake MinnetonkaInstallation of approximately 600 lineal feet of rip rap shoreline erosion protection. . J* \ t7! f; fr\ If ri '.I- «■ '•f ■;• M- ’/•''; , • ■■ l$iV. c ■_ G. 8. I. Pmrmit ApolicatiQB HQ> Applicant: City of Minnetonka 14600 Minnetonka Blvd. Minnetonka, MM 55345 Location: City of Minnetonka, Sec. 13A, Oakridge Road from Minnetonka Blvd. to St. John*# Drive. Stormwater mana^BMnt plan for installation of approximately 1600 lineal feet of storm se*»er and reconstniction of 1600 lineal feet of storm sewer and reconstruction of 1600 lineal feet of roadway. Purpose: Applicant: Location: Purpose: blfc: Crown College 6425 County Road 30 8t. Bonifacius, MM 55375 City of St. Bonifacius, Sec. 5B, Parley Lake Stonnwater management plan for construction of a gymnasium. p. sboiit Annlication Bo. 92-72: Applicant: City of Minnetonka - ^ 14600 Minnetonka Blvd. Minnetonka, MM 55345-1597 City of Minnetonka, Sec. 12A Stormwater management plan for reconstruction of Ford Road from Cedar Lake Road to Runnymeade Lane, including alteration of a wetland. Location: Purpose: Applicant: ■o. 92-79: Location: Purpose: Mrs. D.H. Ankony, Sr. 692 West Ferndale Road Wayxata, MM 55391 ^ ^ City of Waysata, Sec. 12BB, Brown*# Bay, Lake Minnetonka ,, , -Installation of «b»prozimately 245 lineal feet of rip rap shoreline erosion protection. Permit Anollcation Mo. 92-B2: Applicant: City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MM 55364 ^ Location: City of Mound, Sec. 19BC, Black Lake, Lake Minnetonka ^ ^. Installation of rip rap erosion protection along approximately 25 lineal feet of an existing swale in the floodplain. Purpose: Anolication Mo. 92-83; Applicant: United Power Association 17S45 E. Highway 10 Elk River, MM 55330 Location: City of Medina, Sec. 22BC, cast of Willow Drive and south of Hwy. 24 Floodplain alteration to install an electrical transmission structure.Purpose: -2- 1 I tP.vm V V if%' ^ ISsjfc' IS®; ^m‘ • •• 1*“' ii?' "-v^yr ■ i-- c-.-' ‘. 'f ' l5'"‘. Applicant: Location: Purposo: Bill Knapp 13B09 Industrial Park. Boulevard Plyaouth, UK 55441 City of Orono, 8oc. 31DC. north of County »d. 84 and cast of Luco Line Ridge Stoiwator awnagoMont plan for construction of a 3>lot single family residential subdivision to be called *Cristofori Woods Addition.* Applicant: Location: Purpose: NOodend Shores Beach Association 58B0 Lakeview Drive Minaetrists, m 55364 City of mnnetrists. Sec. 35AC, Lake Niaaetonka PlSMsent of s beach sand blanket and floodplain alteration. Applicant: Location: Purpose: Prank Beddor* Jr. 7951 Powers Boulevard Chanhassen. Mi 55317 City of Chaahassen, Sec. 2AA Storasfster nanageaent plan for a single fsadly residential subdivision located south of Pleasant View Road and east of Peaceful Lane. Permit Apolication Bo. 92-87 Applicant: Jan Kersten Location: Purpose: 4737 - 38th Ave. So. Minneapolis, MB 55406 City of Minneapolis, Sec. 18.\B Alteration of the Minnehaha Creek floodplain. for reconstruction of a garage. Applicant: Location: Purpose: J.M. Grewe 4550 Bnchanted Point Mound, MM 55364 «. wCity of Shorewood, Sec. 30CA, Enchanted Island, Lake Minnetonka Installation of 475 lineal feet of rip rap shoreline erosion protection. Permit Application Applicant: City of waysata 600 B. Rice Street Nayzata, MM 55391 ^ Location: City of Waysata, Sec. 6CB, Waysata Bay, Lake Minnetonka Placement of a beach sand blanket.Purpose: -3- Jr m '' % M ; iviiis,;:; = r^ my^' 0m ■ i ''i-: I- / w ^ i” ■■kMmr myy mmy-f='yyM.- •S^S“‘..; *■ mm. '-'K Ifi" F. Q. B. S. T. a. ■V-v , ‘v-' Parait Application Bo. 32-lfl-, Applicant: City of Minneapolis 350 S. Fifth St. Minneapolis, MN 55415 * , ». Location: City of Minneapolis, Sec. 23DA, south of Lahe BolioaiisAlteration of a wetland and floodplain for reconstruction and extension of a storm sewer system. Purpose: Permit APPlicstiQII BQ. 52rlls Applicant: City of St. Louis Park 5005 Minnetonka Bird. St. Louis Park, MM 55416-2290 City of St. Louis Park, Sec. 5BA Stormwater Banagement plan for regrading median islands at the intersection of Minnetonka Blvd. and County Rd. 25. Location: Purpose: Bo, 92-22: Applicant: Location: purpose: City of Deephaven -* - 20225 Cottagewood Road Excelsior, MM 55331 City of Deephaven, Sec. 24AA, St. Louis Bay, Lake Minnetonka Storswater sMnagement plan and shoreline isq|>rovement for reconstruction of the City's main beach area. Pmrmit Application Bo, 52-31: Applicant: Bob Haselow 225 Woodpecker Ridge Road Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Location: City of Tonka Bay, Sec. 28DB, Gideon Bay, Lake Minnetonka Installation of 50 lineal feet of rip rap shoreline erosion protection.Purpose: Applicant: Btl. 52---2A; Location: Purpose: Pete Marinovich 245 woodpecker Ridge Road Tonka Bay, MM 55331 City of Tonka Bay, Sec. 28DB, Gideon Bay, Lake Minnetonka Installation of 75 lineal feet of rip rap shoreline erosion protection. Permit Application Ho. 92-.a&: Applicant: Steven and Joan Perry 19380 Walden Trail Deephaven, MN 55331 City of Deephaven, Sec. 24AA, St. Louis Bay, Lake Minnetonka Installation of 189 lineal feet of rip rap shoreline erosion protection. Location: Purpose: -4- Aiiii' 'liiiihMfi'i Ifte' |r%:ll' ■T\' -m W\ .m- ’- i-|'‘Vs3i..-v., iH: 'W' Ki «v,.,» v:--;>v ...c- r:f -v.-'f !-frf:^ X. T. S. AA life Annltcation Ao- >2-f6; Applicant: Matthew Rand 1905 Beach Leae Minnetonka Beach, i City of Ninaetonka, Lake Miaaetonka Installatioa of 65 lineal feet of rip rap shoreline erosion protection. Location: 55391 Sec. 15CB, Smith Bay, Purpose: OMflt Anolieption WQ» Applicant: Patricia aad Albert Annezstad 219 Moodpecker Bidge Road Toaka Bay, MB 59331 City of Toaka Bay, Sec. 28DB, Gideon Bay, Lake Miaaetonka Installatioa of 50 lineal feet of rip rap shoreline erosion protection. Location: Purpose: a»r»lt Aaalication Bo, >2~9B: Applicant: Mright-Hennepin Co-op. Elec. Bos 330 Birch Ave. S., Maple Lake, m 55358 I,ocation: City of Medina, Sec. 22BC, ea&v. Drive and south of Hwy. 24 Installation of an underground electrical transmission line across a wetland and Crosby Creek. of Willow Purpose: Applicant: Location: Purpose: Frank Fox 27990 Smithto*m Road Shorewood, MN 55331 City of Shorewood, Sec. 31A, Lake Minnetonka Installation of 165 lineal feet of rip rap shoreline erosion protection. Applicant: Location: Purpose: _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Christ Meeocial Lutheran Church 13501 Sunset Trail Plynouth, MR 95441 City of Plyeouth, Sec. 34CC Stormwater management plan for construction of a classroom building at Christ Memorial Lutheran Church. Applicant: Be. 92-101; John R. Smith Location: Purpose: 6401 Cambridge St. St. Louis Park, MN 55416 City of St. Louis Park, Sec. 8CB Stonawater amnagement plan for a commercial development located east of Virginia Ave. at 28th St. -5- -r b. • "e4. ^l. sMim.. v;x, f".-\ '■-.•• ter ■^r im-' Bb-'te--am life* talfp. : '»■ •<'•^1 BW, CC. OD. FF. 06. M Mi Applicant: BO>..32-IQ2: Location: Purpose: City of St. Louis Park 5005 Minnetonka Blvd. St. Louis Park. NR 55416 City of St. Louis Park. Sec. 7CC. 28th St. at Flag Ave. Storiovater oMnageaent plan for construction of a storm sewer system. Applicant: Location: Purpose: Nark Stageberg 21075 Radisson Road Shore%#ood. m 55331 City of SlioreMood. Sec. 36BB. C'ristiaas Lake Floodplain alteration to flatten the slope along the shoreline. Applicant: . 52-104: Location: Pur* '‘se: The RREEF Funds 5353 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 301 Minneapolis. MN 55416 _ » City of St. Louis Park. Sec. 30CB Stormwater management plan for construction of a parking lot for the Park National Bank southeast of the intersection of 1-394 and Fernon Ave. BE. Permit Application Bo. 92-105: Applicant: Location: Purpose: Jaaws Dongoske 3700 Casco Ave. Orono. MN 55391 City of Orono. Sec. 20BC, Carman Bay. Lake Minnetonka Installation of 155 lineal feet f rip rap shoreline erosion protection. Permit Annlicetion Ho. 92-106: Applicant: Terry Mazzetelli 4964 Edgewater Drive Mound. MN 55364 Location: City of Mound. Sec. 13DO. Harrison Bay, Lake Minnetonka Purpose: Installation of 50 lir'^al feet of rip rap shoreline erosion protection. Applicant: ■o. 92-.107: Location: Purpose: Michael Pyzdrowski 3916 Merriam Ave. Minnetonka. MN 55343 City of Minnetonka. Sec. 23BB. northwest of the intersection of Merriam Ave. and Myrtle Court Stormwater management plan for a 7-lot single family residential subdivision to be called "Heritage Oaks 2nd Addition." -6- ^ :.:V i ir’ t t?' - -A* i-; • - 'f ste*' '^•?r ■ •>>; ■iiti II. jj. Applicant: Location: Purpoao a2~lQa:City of Plynouth 3400 Plymouth Blvd. city*of**Plr»uthrs«:. 18C6D, south of Medina Boad and east of the Medina/Plyraouth ■uaicipal boundary.Stonavater amnageiaent plan for street and n^ij£ty construction in "Bridlewood Farms 2nd Addition.* .lieetioa ■«- 12~10B: Aoplleant:The Rottlund Company# Inc. ^ 5201 East liver load. Suite 301 City^of ltlnaetonks. 8«:. 12D, south of Cedst Lsk* Boad and aaat of Ctaanbtlat Road- Stonwstor emnageamnt plan for a 56-unit pyXti-Caaiily residential development to be called "Autumnwood Villas.* Location: purpose: fEMlti htwlication Bo Applicant: D.T. Nadge Location: Purpose: 875 Forest Arms Lane Hound, Mi 55364 , i.City of Orono, Sec. 7AB, Forest Lake, Lake Al^ration of the floodplain to modify an existing drainageway. t;-? m & & ■^^5- • .-a'l s. da 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. f X4 . Sr ^ ,§mr ViX . •Wn g..ruttve Cpt—lttM Repor roMiaints end vtolation a finance Com A. Treasurer's Report. Plans end Prperaias f^fwaiaittee Report. Ptiles end Policies CoiwnittOO ROPOI.t- Kneineer's Report. arrornev's RePOIt. iingtnished BusineSfl* pew Busineas. ad-inurnment. Report. 9I70AJ(62) -7- mi$1«.. '®j; ^::m^p. 'V ?4'-i;# . ,>• 7.^ h. m ^fe^v.. : 7. iiiV'- fe^m. LAKE M'NNE’CNKA rONSEtl. A^ICN L'S'a'rT iUN r* ^1. 0 '— ft*#;"' ' .' iiii - ’• fcP- liSli#"' Lake Minnetonka Sun-Saiior for Excelsior. Minnetonka. Wayiata and Westonka editions From; Date: Eugene R. Strommen Executiv® D’cector 473-70^3 June 3. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE big island. INC. NEW DOCK LICENSE The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District will hold a public hearing at Tonk.i Bay City Hall, *♦*>01 Manitou Rd, Tonka Bay, 7 PM Wed, June 2^, 1992 ^n the matter of a new multiple dock license application by Ralph Hatch of Big Island, Inc. for 14 boat storage units at its site on Mahpiyata Island, Orono on Lower Lake South of Lake Minnetonka. tor Lake^tinnetonka Conservation District mm !?>ary^ - .. 1 s m- . J ^ ?:• ’ ’ m, ^■M:i . - .■ i?"" is'^-cF'5# !^^'5yv'-'.- kU^ : .‘ V: s^BI# i»=" LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 900 EAS’’’ //A>2ATA BCtLE ’v ARC 'iO* .VA^ZA’A Minnesota 5539’• ^Ek.E*^CN£ 6'Z 4*3 '033 EUGENE « STROMMEN ExECu^'ivE O'BECTOR Jun« 12, 1992 Playhouac Gregory T. Reisdorf 5^5 3 6870 Sunnyside Dr, Maple Grove 6-59 279^ Greetings. Charter Boat Licensee: We are pleased to present }'our 1992 charter boat registration for operation on Lake Minnetonka. We encourage you to display this certificate on board your charter boat. Your charter boat operation is recognized by the LMCD Board of Directors as providing a valuable public access to the lake. The District is pleased that you take the time and investment to attract public participation so chat a wide range of people can enjoy this valuable lake resource. In order to make everyone’s visit on Lake Minnetonka an enjoyable, quality experience, piease alert all pilots to maintain minimum wakes during nori.al charter operation, avoiding large wakes while en route at faster speeds to pickup poin t s. Note: Please forward copies of any pilot license renewals that expire during the season. A self-addressed envelope is enclosed for this purpose. similarly, should your insurance coverage expire during the season, that renewal certificate should be provided promptly. Recently the City of Wayrata advised the LMCD that they will no longer be issuing permits for use of the Depot public docks. However, charter boat operators are still entitled to use the Wayzata Depot public docks as a Port of Call to pickup and leave passengers. The LMCD urges the following guidelines when using the Depot docKs: Advise advance-booked patrons to park in the City s free municipal parking ramp at the rear of the Carisch Building between Broadway and Walker streets. The Depot parking lot should not be used. Most city streets have limited parking with time not recommended for charter patron use limits and are An;\'frr*o 1 ^0 i--.'f ■: ' M ■ ■'V I’c ' r-.‘ ■ ■ i^&k "Sifi" ■ ‘UtMl * pi ■m:F> 5s*'■%rr’^m- i-fe'•■■. s-'-''j; 3 V. A - Z. •*• mm '#1'^' 'f- -.i: #1 |, •n . . -^V ■ : - ;■ LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Charter Boat licetisees. Page 2 B .Advise catering services to avoid tying-up limited space while unloading, using the sp.ice only for the tine during which supplies are being moved to or from the charter boat (approx. 15-30 minutes ' C .Check with the Wayzata Chamber of Commerce, e 7 3 -5 5 , regarding dock-use dates to avoid conflicts with chamber or city special events. LMCD Chair Dave Cochran and Lake Use Committee Chair Bert Foster join in wishing you a successful charter season. Sincerely, LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Rachal Thibault Administrative Technician • nc! certificate, envelope, oh arte p root er c/mncl Hennepin County Sheriff s/^^tor Pa City where berthed Orono^No^h Shore Drive Marina) City of Port of Call Orono : D. Cochran D. Foster c/ ^ ’ V- . > wm a.k ^ •«a, 5. ^*1 ^ f A. J -‘ -■■ -* a « ^ V 'le'- - ■ / - V -'* . *» :/^i A " V i C^ \ » 'S'/'I y^-p i r !< '«5 ^ JT i\ ;:4>% l|.R-i Li."- v^_ • -’*■ 1 ’4- F ’;- ^ '■ *■ \ i> if-> •P i .6 i> L ^ '•* 'uS ;fi i - P-- f r ■h; -1 A3'?I Kf EV 2* o n2 ,^-— ^ CJ yi ■ S- 5. Sp 5' “> J, n a 3 ~ "?• i B o6» ?5 “ 3 CO C 3 «5* ^ "*• O ‘ 3 n' c^i2 ^ Z a. o* ?:• o a 2 3 I 5 85 S n ”ii Hi5* o "2' —• • . w CC - . cr rt Lat • o p (^ * »—• ^ orpa. 3>op I-#o p- n3 -:?:''3'-2 o • ’ '* 3 '5* S' A• ■ ' tS: 2 '.'■.'l=n 8.^ .-', q' §i5 * 1 “.& a* : P ^ r"*g. o 2 to g' a. g J'. •3- ^ I" e. “• E. 2 • S 5g =Is g I^ c: 2 § !P §■• S* g- § *5 a 2* rj o' c- S' § 1 ^ S- 5 3 S. S o. a§ 5 § i § c< iiL*^ O s 3 r > m 3 Z 2m i>lA iiii 1^ f/. §5 t^La o 0'S I o z: V (/> m < '*■ V* > I.' \*o h vlI .€ os:f§z ■»%v - dT Co 2.- :"1 if^ • c ~ 1 • rV a >N >>i : o 2 :' i. -r-*>0 K> »’ ’’• \ V fSimi -! '"V ;vjfvTui,^ •y \ ,' ( 4 / 1 4 « • . * W •■ >^f!^] X !i5^i ft 5 b-!r...ym' fe. i Si -T ■ ■ ;T A S T <• Si' S£ ■«V. S->- y^' >T «» feii ■' - -\ ■ lake M'NNtTCN!' ' CONSERVAT:u N' -'^-riCTIw - ^_> To:Lake ?»innetonka Sun-Sailor for Excelsior, Mitmetonka. Wayxata and Westonka editions F r !) to t Date" Eugene R. b * rommen Executive Director 473-7013 June 3. l‘*'^2 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE BIG ISLAND. ISC. NEW DOCK LICENSE The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District will hold a public hearing at Tonka Bay City Hall, 4901 Manitou Rd. Tonka Bay, 7 PM Wed, June 24. 1992 in the matter of a new multiple dock license application by Ralph Hatch of Big Island, Inc. for 14 boat storage units at its site on Mahpiyata Island, Orono on Lower Lake South of Lake Minnetonka. tor Lake District •1 f Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission _______ r<>*r 1 m a _____________443 OAK STREET • EXCELSIOR MINNESOTA 55331 • (612) 4tMpWn ^ U‘ • ’ -- - ■. ,..• . .-' i iJUN li LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING TUESDAY. JUNE 16, 1992 5:00 P.M. ROOM 204. EXCELSIOR COMMUNITY CENTER AGENDA I • ISJ- If'* TS;: 1 X • ... .III. C4iil to Ordor Approval o£ May 1992 Minut«s R«port« «) Offxc«r»:Treaauror 1. May 1992 Ch#ck Oiaoursem^nta ’V b) Administrator/Production Coordinators e) Trisx Unfinishsd Businsss .r 41) TrxAX Anjx#r» Delation of CSPAN ll -Ar': ■4- . •/= iWr': b) Updsts on Channsl 6 Reception Concsrn c) Status of Studio Equipmsnt Saplacsssnt d) Rsvisw Nawslattar Dolivsry to Ail Cities Kbt* Business . Msttsrs from the Floor ^^^VII, Adjournment a) Explanation of Outside Accounting Firm b) Reimburse Printing Charge to Medina (474.00) V ■' f: ^ .V m \£i 1 iS ■.i’ 4 ■r i J IA<Z BlNNETOmCA CABU COBBUMICATIONS COHHISSION FULL COffilSSION REE71M0 TUESDAY. RAT 19. 1992. 5:00 PS ETCELSIOB ELEREirrUT SCHOOL GYRHASIUH 443 OAE STREET. CICELSIOR 1.^ T9 maCh«xr tn« ••-ating to oro«r at 5:05 ?.S. m- m&r OIllCTOtS P8ESEHT B«rH iraJkC*l/Snior*aooa Jis OlM>Exc«iJior Tia Pattrin/Orono Tia Saiasar'Bxnn4triJta Otto Rxnnotnata Carl loaon/iprinG Pane fawaaM Stanza/D««pnav«n Aaa ThiM/Hooina Marlyn Dxll/Spring .-ir< «laa Oray/Graanwooo Xay iUraca/St. oomiaexua Bobart Riirpny/Excaiaxor Iflbbi Ab4o/Rxnn«ton<a oaacn Oaan Jonfiaoa/Snorawooo OTHOS WESEMT Jxa Daniaia/Aaaxnxjtrator Coilaan Lxnaa<oog/Aaaxn Aaat. Jxa Scnxnolar/Procuct. Coor. Paul Naaarow/Trlax ilW AStlOVAL or HINUTES BBaaeal aa<ad tor dxacuaaxon April 2l« lfS2 aaatxng or Botxon to approva tna axnutas ot tna S.19.92.1; Pattrin aovau Tilt Mtioo piaaa^ aaanxaouaiy. to approva tna ainutaa. Oloa aaconoao. III.i < ft ^ > 'I'v Hfe- & aftaiaa 9.19,92.2: Wxlczaic aovat to approva tha Juat Ciaxaa for tna parxoo of 4/1/92 tlWOttgn 4/30/92. Thxaa aacondad. Tha action passad unanxaouaiy. Vileatl; aaplaxnad tha lat Quarter Fxnanexal Saport and asicac ror quaatxona. ibtMf aakad aliuat tha parcantaqa already apant of tha 1992 oudgat. Oanxaia tupletaad that there are once a year aapandxturas that create a hxqnar spanaxnq rate# aed that fxdure ie apread over tvalva aontna. itotien 5.19.92.3 Vllctea aoved for approval of lat Quarter Fxnanexal iapert. Oloa aecondad. Hotion paaaad unanxeoualy. Vileaefe atatad that the city councxla had recexved a ravxaad copy of tna 1992 hedptt# vith a cover latter explaxnxnq tha changes. It raquxraa no additional apptttei free the city councxla. iiiiliiliritftr*! RfTHua Oaeiela diatrxbdiatrxbutad the nevsietter. They vxll be passed out to 12 of our eltiea this week, Brancel felt that it vxll be a real asset to tha Coaaxsaxon. Oanxaia also distributed tha billing insert. Ha gave Nazarov credit for '• > •''■Si'-"' "■ - - - - - - - ■irfciltmO this to go out at no cnaraa to the Cosnxssxon. Salazar aada a point or ®i|:^tiia»ittll9 •••htov and Trxax. Daniels eantioned tha Sikorski-orancel interview.fait «.ne newspaper coverage vas axcallant. He also pointed out the new Coaaissxon sign and showed pictures freo the new CoMASPAOii canera .'/Til' u H'r'f: • 'U.’, •' 1 ■1 fj'i > 'i I .T i .ijaSL I: v: tp%.;'; '-fv^--Si"*** V:-K-t:-pif', '■ -Pi !#■ .y -■ w r - m* W£ I* < > f >■ if Qi|i?v;: ■:. .■i^-' cmM- ■W\ .1,, ■ SP^: Llt^ZZ • .'?iy i?#i .'1inat«s rkg* Two « n« nic »tt*no«: 'n# •.'.'iAnn«* •> :c*n ncuse inj r«i.t :* *4j »or« o; jocial •w«nt tn*n Anytninj •tij*. n« r*it«rit»a now«v*r t.ia^ t.»« :xvic *v«ntJ fi att«nain9 n«j r««.xy n«^p«o cr««t« puoiic Aw«r«n«ss oz tn<9 Ica«i«sx.cn. Production laoort icnxnoior atatic tn«t *j now pr>ar*«j niv* Boon croatoo sinc4 tno Mbti^ .j"?2 M«tin9. on* or wnicn u •'.'oaajnity occti.i;nz’. Tho joring wcr<3ncD is ovor aj or Coni^nt - tnoro n«« ooon « jooo roaoonao. triM KnpQgt dnsarow aiatncuzoc tn« prooraamin^ April 1942: iuaaarv ana tn# JuBJcriz'.xsn r + oott lar Hoses rassed . . , i o basic Suoa Expanded Sasic Sues o » • 0 •» Total Pay Units i, 5o5 Total A/0*s t. i J 3 Total xeeotes asxeo aoout 13PAI4 Ana iz pay for xz, jon't ?ot it. >^*U3 roquoating it as w<ti.x- srancoiacntO'i that n« naa naa poop...# in nu coaaunicy osaoo Vasarow to cnooc on cnis aattwr ano cat bac< to tha Conausion on it. vioa au^^aatao that jinca wa ara not ujin<) ai^ four of our local cnannals, tnat poaaioxy C3PAM II can oa oroaoc*st on one of tnaa. .Naaarow jaid ha would lco< into it. Thiaa aacac aoout tna Cherry Hiil area in Haoina. Daniaia e:<plaina miMESS a) Vpdntn on Channel 6 Recaption Concern Oaniela inforaeil the Coaaission tnat Cnannal 6 reps cancelled at approxiaateiy 4<30 p.a. tooay and inataao faxed the attacned .atter. uaniale atated that the Septenber 1, 1992 aeadlina to have thia corrected u atill tne ^oal. Pattrxn aaeed about tne potential laproveaent atated in Har< Oyaaa' letter. I>aniela explained that a *road bora* would aliainate quite a fee aaplifier atationa ehich ahould xaeroaae tne value of tne recaption, however, tnis involvea aoae oi^onaxvo oenatructxon. hi Trias ftiidlo Iqulpoent Report Analyala Danxola atated that the report la a very questionable one. There inconaxatencxee and non-pertinent xteaa throuqnout. He had proolena wxtn •uanarT; the najorxty of the report was hignly critical, however, tne auanary coopliaentary. SaXasar aa<ed Nasaroe if Tnax would be replacing needed equipment. brancel •tated that thia topic la on the agenda (itee V.b) but that it will be diacuaaed are tne was Oaaiela distributed an equipment liat and stated that the Francniae Rpreeaent atatea that Tnax la reaponaible for purchasing and maintenance of 0(|ltipMnt. Currently, our equipment la consistently in need of repair after snort periods of use. Our equipeent is approxisately 7 years old and two studio caseraa are in need of replaceeent. Salazar stated he felt that this is a strong issue that needs a solution laaediately. Mazarow stated that he felt that, in accordance witn the Francniae Agreeaent. aonxes would be provided in years 5 and 7 for new equipment and in ter Cdepliance with this. Tnax provided S7,00u last year for year 7. Nazarow felt ' that he and Tnax have gone above ano beyond the franchise agreeaent. 11 I iHM ■f r I] ■J '"b UKCC - .’?*;/ .??*. f«9« 7hr«« mm Er>^ • j^:’ t.m 3l«S*row *.jo *c<nc --•»:::■« th« iict ot :r.* ;i3#r* sni :r.4 ^’i-z-.zicctt in n-j<?c Of r*plocoa«nt, no««v«r Im.j tnat •ii jn'^y ^j<»o -»quirii«rt jr.o'i.j :■* ouz :r.*s<*si . in ^axtxofit 415.UU0 - .iiO.uou 3*7 o<* ioo*«a it i2r *ov;n»3 cojt*. ?n*t « »uz rnaaiTTit jnouii bo oot up to *t*c<.o tnu uau*". ionioi* roopoiiaoo tnot no £*«.* itoa iii.j .r i r^r.not co ^tijfoctori*-/ ropoiroc it jnouio do r*p-*c«';. ■jouip'ao't wou.i to *n onoccoptooio toncopt z-'z rooi*cooont. xooon ijooo *nor* tno acnoy rocoivoo ir. tno it.n *nc: 'tn **j joonc. SIXlCSOX Jtltoo tn»t it o*J ujoa to *■.:z no* ocuipoont. no j**":*-! tn*t no lo*t 4t -Of tao xntorproration or tno ioroooont mat i* at luoat^^n. :-o sJcaoiasion a WMMrotonaing u mar Iriaa la roaponaiOi.o for tno jri;in** oouicsant . anotnor it 1^ or roplacod. <<i-cxo< dil not *oroo *itn janio.a« no*o<or, *ni atatoo a i. t.n«t to 3*ntion t '.nr t n co-.or vrono &r ^At ujo<3 O^xpoont oouio oo tin.* aa long it u in too quality ctniition. orancoi aa<od for • rfsoiutxcn. fatmn ccooofttoo mat caaeraa ano-ii.2 o* r«o.*coa aa xo conparioio. Ho alao atatou mat tno rooort noc-octoo mxu 4io oqvxpoont. ialaxar atitod mat it was a axapi.o aoiution - Tna.t auat ;tac.y *itn mo francnxao o^roonont. Oloa atatoo mat tno o^uipoont *iat janio^a iiatrlouto'i wa* only a au^^oatoo liar of o<5u taont ano t.nat tnoro la aoao viri^t-in* Motiao 1.19.P2.4 oaiasar novoi tnat Triax coo?./ wimin jv la/a in ffipXacxn^ tno caooraa. If tnoy do not cooo.y. tno Oonoiaaion rovorta to tn* -ottor of Crooxt xn anxeh aSuO por day wxli bo aimcrawn untxl cc«piian;o u not. oray OOCOndod* iloaon oovoo to aoeno mo ootion to atato mat tn-? o-iiiioont nuat co ooo^tiblo oxth tho support o-^uipoont. iaiizar ana Gray concurro-a. oica novo-a to IdMtlfy tho VoctorScopo as also bom>j part ot tno ootion aa nooa support ^ oquipoont. Saiacar and Gray concurreo. Pactrin .tiov-a tnat n-? a«a unccntortabio Nb; oxtb tho torn "conpatibio* ooinq uaod in tno motion ano tn«it it anou-o atat-s "no , looo than orxgxnal apoca*. Saiatar and Gray concurroo. If ^^ndod Hctlon 5.IP.92.4 Salazar movod tnat Triax auat coopiy uxtnin tiUkfty days to roplaco canora oquxpnont ana VoctorScopo with quality no loss tnan tho orxgxnal oquxpoont apocificatxona m tho proposal, ana coopatibio with OBXOtxaf support oquxpsont. If not xn coapiianco at tno ond of tnxrty aaya, Csbio C<MMXSSXon will withdraw asOO por day iron tno Lottor of Credit until is.. iply. Cray aocondod. notion paaaea witn Olaa opposed - would preror not to crodxt tfxtiidrawal xsoooxatoly . tno tho thoy lowy IWv Ip# Vsivo of Oidor Copxor Naclixno Oanxola atatod tnat tn# old copxor is wortn approxiaatoiy afy.JU. ^Iglljj-on S.19.P2.5 Uxicsoic aovod tnat tno Adainiacracor dxapoao of oquipnont soon fit. Pattrxn aocondod. Notion paaaod. f s) Pfff mmsi Eloctlon of 1992 Exocutlvo Conaxttoo irsneol xnforaod tho Coaniasion that Otto Wx Iczok has roaignod fron jCsbio CoMXSaxon. Sho atatod that tho Eloctxon Connxttoo'a rocoonondatxona for iif#’ji^^txons aro aa follows: tho tho K- Chsxr Vico Cnaxr Socrotary Troaauror At Large At Largo At Largo Barb Brancol Jxa Olds Lesley Hugnes-Seaaans Tim Pattrxn Xay Kirscn Tin Salazar Dennis Stanga <• 1 SJICCC - Sin»ir«3 f«9« Four £iraftC*I tfton op«n*c tn« floor for nc«a.n*tion* *no r«c«iv«*o r.on-*. Hotittft S.19.92.6 Wxlcz»< *ov«4 to »cc«pt tnu ix3t of Co»aiJSion-#r * •« tn« l!>92»93 £jMCutxv« Co««itt*4. 8o*«n tocondod. Hotxon phased. Fraacfild*/Proposal languago that roquxraa vidoo production 9qMi.pmmnz roplac—oat This was aiacuaaao in Itaa IV,b. ting «ith Congrassaan Sikoraki ragarding I P,- ■m ci Chair Iraacal'a raport on ■.I. 4tS0 drancal statau tnat 3iaorj<i acanowlaogao racaivmg tna r«so*jtiona an<a ana igot hi» Congraaaional vott for H.8. 4850. Tha vote aiii ta<a place after flaaorxai Say. Aoard pmaastation for •Progran o£ tha Quarter* Oaniala anoaad tna award naaing Carl &org aa tna recipient fl. ITTPS flOB TKI FLQQl Vileraa wanted it noted that 3urrowa Coif Couraa feaia t.nat t.na axpanaion nroa imar than anould be receiving cable. Thiaa aaaad unara aa would be aoving. Daniaia axplainao t.nat aa of row no daeuiMi hea l»aan aada. pnttrin aekad tnat a production rapraaentativa froa tha Orono studio sake a report at tha Conaiaaion aeatinga. m &• 19*92.7 Wilcsex novec to adjourn. Olds seconded. Tne seating was ad journed at 6:30 p.a. aubni^ad. , CoUa«» Undaicoog 3 AdPimatrativa Aeaiatant mw ' ■ ■ft. -ft** >' Mi IS*m ■'P BERNICK AND LIFSON A AssociAno** ArrowNC^s AT CAW S«Jirc laoo '*mC CO uO mma OC • •OO SOtJUCVAAO MINNEAfOLIJ. MINNESOTA 35-^16 (•it) 8<A#*itCO rACSiMiLC June 5, 1992 s ., \m^ e. ftiax Cablttvision 1S04 Second Str«4t tlas«cm» MH 56093 CSirriFIED HML Return receipt requested Yo llboa It Mey Concern: r*. tlMMd be edvlsed that pursuant to its franchise ordinance Article ^fX0 Section 4., the LaJce MinnetonJca Cable Communications Commission mt its aeetinY of May 19, 1992, held Triax Cablevision in violation of one or mere sections of the franchise ordinance for failure to con tinue to provide equipment for the provision of comrav..ity Specifically, the commission found Triax in violation for failure So replace two (2) studio cameras with appropriate operatinc accessories and one (i) VectorScope. V„ .Bm'tailure to replace this failed equipment with equipment of equal or qremter quality of that originally proposed will result, effective ^^•*e J»S, 1992, in the imposition of a penalty of $500.00 per day or any part thereof during idiich the failed equipment is not replaced. 'mxf-- -iiv'v the Xxecutive Committee of the Commission will meet on June 16, 1S92, to review your compliance with this obligation of the *5y^^^** ***^ will proceed to draw from your letter of credit the naceaaay, y>enalties if you have not achieved compliance by*- the m^puLred date. a. Liim-: •i- ■ have^any questions, or wish to appeal this decision to the Cyittee at its June meeting, please contact Jim Daniels office. Any appeal will not stay the running of the timetable for compliance established by the commission. mif 0. Creighti l^sgal Counsel > Mce Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission J Site-^..V mM" ii m- p^-'Sgii '■’S'iS >?r-' *r '■>. ^3 f-'-v; ?:‘C &.. -'ly/. .... ;t-^-?s-SS fSisai m-,^- PjS^' A. mm- :1 teiiEa--' *%; ■;m' *Sk. TO: FROM: Membtrs Lakt Minnetonka Cable Commission Mark Oyaa$ interim Director Metro Cable Network OATL SUBJECT: May 19.1992 Reception of MCN's signal in Thax/Lake Minnetonka service area The issue of poor reception of MCN's signal in the Lake Mkmetonka Cable Commission has been before MCN's Board of Directors twice this Spring (March and May). They have directed the folowing: 1.) That MCN staff work with the Commission and representatives at Triax to identify ways of Improving the existing arringement 2.) That MCN staff explore other alternatives with MUwest Cable & Sateilite and Paragon Cable systems for signal enhancement 3.) That the staff identify other systems within the seven county area that also have difftcuity with reception. To date: 1.) We have met with Jim Daniels and Paul Nazzrow and together expressed mutual commitment to a satisfactory resolution. Triax has identified a potential improvement in the connection from King which b estimated at $20,000.00. 2.) Midwest Cable and Sattikte does not hive a financially viable altemative to offer at this time. Paragon, through their Vice President. Debra Cottone. is vdHing to explore aftematives and lend technicai advise where appropriate. They have not completed an initial investigation at this time. t want to stress that while MCN's Board of Directors Is eager to assist in finding a solution to this difficuit problem; MCN's financial resources are extremely limitad. Therefore, an extraordinary change in how our signal is transmitted is very unlikely. The state law and currant operative local regulations leave questions as to who is indeed responsa)ie for ensuring quality reception in every area. However, we are a valuable Metro wide resource and are committid to do il within our means to provide a first rate signal to al Metro Cabia households. I have ittached for your information the state law which faciitates the regional channel on VHF channel six. We look forward to working with you and your staff as we seek a solution. thank you. J 'i 'ftii hii.iii DATS KAY S K. - 4 ' * *^10401 g A0402 1D4D3 2414 KAY HAY HAT HAY HAY HAY HAY HAT HAY RAY HAY HAY HAY HAY HAY HAY RAY MAY RAY HAY HAY HAY RAY MAY HAY MAY HAY RAY S 5 Ss ss 12 IS IS IS IS 14 15 IS 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 26 29 29 29 29 29 I -■t-i %W-'mm- •i i,' Si V' 5|iI .fcis .irt/ 15'?-: CHECIv DIS»0 RoEMENTS PAYABLE AMOUNT ACCT NoRVtE^T cAN^4*Lii.40 FED TAa D£r'. S 11 PERA .3-4.53 PENSIvI* r-cStrirS JIM iOHINDLES -5 . S5 TRAV£. EXPENSES ,0PY DUPl.: :ATiNJ ?&D oiO.OO OFF E'.-J.r'N£« rA.<> LAKE BUSINEJo SUPPLY Lb.99 f F SUPPLY ALPHA VIDEO A AUDIO 34.98 ST'.'_ .M .MA-NX PAYCHEX 30.35 S TA.-IY SERV POSTMASTER ~'j . 7 4 r'. STmGc JIM DANIELS 9"5.86 PAY AuLL JIM SCHINDLER .72 Pm i Auux. AARON BLEOHERT ioO.55 PAinuLx. COLLEEN LINDSKOOO 120.95 r A Y.*\uLL POSTMASTER 15.55 POSTAGE JIM DANIELS 4 3.6^TRA^£- £.lP£NocS FAST SUNS •bu . 00 AjW/PAoMu PERA i :54.8 3 PENSION riNtrlTS JIM SCHINDLER .MU.00 INSURANCE RTKA COMM SERVICES 4jU.00 •n £. .4 1 JXH DANIELS 2u0.00 I NS - JANC S TONKA PRINTING 54.9u vt’s supply ALPHA VIDEO A AUDIO Z7.75 STvjIO MAINT PERA 12.00 LIr£ 1A NOE US WEST 115.95 :£L£P.nuNE QUALITY QUICK PRINT <j72.00 AC'J UEV JIM DANIELS 978.86 PAYROLL JIM SCHINDLER 539.24 PA 1AvoL AARON BLECHERT 181.31 PA YRoLl. COLLEEN LINDSKOOG xOO.98 rAY AoL.. JIH DANIELS 51.00 sssssssissas TRAVE- £aF£NSES TOTAL CLAIMS 79x4.21 CHECKING ACCOUNT BttQinnxn^ bAl.#7793.06 CIaxm -7914.21 SAVxngs C«rtx£xcat«15000.00 C«rrxfxcat« Int«r«at 146.10 Inauranc* Refund (League of Cxtxea) 264.00 Copy Mech Sale 50.00 Incaraac 33.71 Service Charge -11.60 XSXSSSS3SSS END CHECKING BAL ai5361.06 NORVEST ACCOUNTS CO aa^ure 8/S/92 425000.00 CD aatura 8/5/92 25000.00 CO aabure 8/4/92 SCCU ACCOUNTS 20000.00 sasaasssaas 70000.00 Balance Share Acet ai7215.23 Balance Preferred 54499.90 SXSSSSSSSS5 71715.13 TOTAL FUNDS A157076.19 • ■ . *•'1^ 'i .m HENNEHN SHERIFF'S DEP/miENT 6 Courthouse Minneapolis. Minnesota 55415-1369 Don Omodt Sherift May 1, 1992 %I , . . . I' W- >,••• «■• ' -'V ■■f.* 1«A Stephan Sullivan VQLXOI DKPARnOKMT 445 Nlllov Driva Long Laka MM 55356 Daar Chiaf Sullivan: X aa vritiiM thia lattar to coaaand tha actions of your Oowity IS and 19. Sines X waa availabls at Matsr Patrol, I aeknovlstfgsd that I could respond to assist your fno raasrvs units« as wall licensed officers, aclmwladged that they were also responding. While enroute, we were infon^ hy one of your reserve units that the accident was actually a personal injury autoeotive accident - not a pedestrian accident. I arrived on the scene one sinute after I that I was responding. By the ties I had arrived, there were two Orono Police Reserve Units already ^ dixeeting traffic and tending to f<^ i Tour reelrve officers did an exceptional j vas proud to he able to work alongside these pe<MPla* I would like to acknowledge the efforts of Officers: 0 J Troy Dennison, Mike Carlson, Bonnie taii^. You have an exceptional depar^ent, including y®^ reserve officers. I look forward to again being able to worx alongside thee. sincerely, DON OMODT--SI By: Shrg^’^^Bill 6fiandler, Sheriff's Water Patrol Division HENNEPIN COUNTY on tfquc'l opportunity employer cc: Captain Peterson iipaii !5%SS!o.inR •" ^ V. -. m^.^‘ f lit A PREUMINARY REPORT: •iETROPOUTAN COUNCIL AND ITS ROLE IN REGIONAL GOVERNANCE Metropolitan Council and Its Role in Regional Governance................1 I. AMM Involvement: The Metropolitan Governance Task Force.........1 II. The Metropolitan Coundrs Role: What Should Its Concerns Be?....2 Recommendation: Re-emphasIze a Visionary Role.......................2 Regional Demands, Regional Thinking.............................................2 Mora Time to Look to Future, Address the Present...........................3 III. Metropolitan Coundl's Constituencies: Getting to the Customer.....3 Recommendation; Seek More Participation from Local Level.......4 IV. Metropolitan Governance: Who Does What?................................4 RecommendaUon; Revive House Metropolitan Affairs .........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................^ Reoommandatlon: <^uncll Examination of Issue Areas................5 Raeommandatlon: Ra^ne Regional Agencies and Their RaaponaMiltiaa...........................................................................® V. Coundl MambersNp and Operation: Serving its Public...................7 Raeommandatlon: Direct Election of Council Members.................7 Recommandation: Revise Council Chair, Dally Operatf one. Appointmanta..............................................................................® VI. The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities: Its Role.................8 Wo tif MvtropolHan Governanc# Task Force, Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Copyright 1992 Hsi .. #■... ... • ' «.V ■ mi - Ntiif 0% mp.^^:% i.ftr- ■!• !=!'•.; >•: ■- . ^ »'^i;L ;i.. H-;. ... _0v'fv "-m> y*:• ?s#i!:’vr Executive S ummary: METROPOLITAN COUICIL AND ITS ROLE IN REGIONAL GOVERNANCE Km Rm« B. R«-«affeaiii of tke Ccoocfl's Visioowy Role io RftiooaJ Govornmee: ties and ch*llen|« 10 Mat ittaa oppottvaities and chal tenges. D. Appoint ViMoaCo—iltfMoeaplofe opportaaitiesMt chaltenges. iaA with city officials and staff. *^^wap* bcts»ecn MetropoHttn Council and local uniu of government. iaiian: Raviva Honaa of Rtpretentmivea Malropelitaa Affiairs Caounitlec Ibr discossion of mvjopoliian viewi bafoae House Hiembers. lominanlly metropolitan legislators. C Senate coonterpmt needed in House. iMi of IssM Areas as environmental concerns. tran^nruttionAransit, ifyingthem. 4 ’ » ’ H ' • - I I V . Iilconaui Ittan^pomftcilitiesConMnissionfioni its conent regional status. C Change Land UMAdvisofyCaHMritiee to Land Use Conunission wiA review authority. rs and chain of agencies an J commi: '..■V 4 » , K B, daSion: Direct nore Kan two consecutive four-year terms, on Idiot by adf-nominoiioo. nomination by cityAown councils andAv county ■e*^ by ffft******* ivp rMMnMtg diawigl- •f V , Agency AppointmaotsRtviaa Daclion of Chair, Daily Council Operai A. dalrelected biennially from Council. B. Eaacmive Director runs day-to-day operations and is answerable to the Council. C. Agency appointments for fixed terms. ■ F' S,- i; 'i.': im. “f f 'u '.■ I. '1 % V. ,■ > . Metropolitan Council and Its Role in Regional Governance The Metropolitan Council »as fonned to address specific pa->Mems. such as providing an adequate sewer system for Muineapoiis, St. Paul and the surrouniing suburbs, but it had a bniader focus Its mcssion was to KTve the metropolitan area. Its first members ook what could be called a pro-aciive stance and. over lime, became involved ui issues such as land use planning, parks and open space, and transportauon to allow for the orderly expansion of growth m the Twin Ciues metropolitan area Dunng the years since its inception to the present, however, the Metropolitan Council is perceived to have become more polittr»ied and is ofIhandedJ> referred to as the ’State Department of Metropolitan Affairs." It has, either by design or happenstance, beconre an enforcer of rules and regulauons. It has berome enmeshed in minutia »id dealing with the here-and now. functioning less as an institution of fdrwtml'ttiiirfang pUnning. Its condition became such that Gov. Ante Carlson called upon the Council to justify its existence or cease operauon. Whei the Council was created to address the issues of sewrts. transit, and parks and open space, it seem ^ natural for the Council to engage more heavily in the day-ti>-day activities of the systems md agencies it envisioned. The Council did noihmg wmng. per se Rather it seemed to instituiion,iJi/e its vision, which pulled it hack from forward-thinking 1. AMM Involvement: The Metropolitan Governance Ta.sk Force The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities, based on a rtcommendaiion from its own Futures Committee, named the Metropolitan Cjovemance Task Fvucc to examine the regional governance system for the Twin Cities metropolitan area. The AMM, acong upon concerns expressed by local officials, embarked upon this venture for several rea.sons; • The region seemed to have difficulty in addressing several cntical issues, such as water and air quality, waste management and tra-isii. • Some solutions, such as "con.solidition." have been atl>.inced even though they may not accomplish an intended goal. • Tlic Task Force offered a forum in which city officials could examine govemimcc systems that may not have been advanced. The Task Force's charge included: 1. Tht examination of the range of local and regional governmental services with an eye to where problems exist. 2. A review of various methods of governance. 3. The directives of making recommendations about which level the planning, coordination and delivery of local governmental services should occur, and making recommendations on the types of governance needed to achieve efficient service delivery. Tliese recommendations could include consideration about the specific re'? of the Metropolitan Council in the overall governance system, comments on which services should be delivered by the various units of government, and advice on the formation or deletion of regional agencies The Task Force conducted panel discussions to gain a better perspective of the Metropolitan Council and how it evolved. The Task Force heard from former Council chairs, current Council members, metropolitan agency representatives, “good government" Council watchers, county representatives, and appro priate members (tf the stale House (. 'epresentadves and Senate. In addition the Task Force looked to regional governances structures in the United States and Canada to sec what worked elsewhere. In this preliminary report, the Ta^ Force will focus on what it believes the Metropolitan Council ’s role should be in areaj of concern to the Metropolitan Area. t tl' h-%. |S’ 5V^ m- , f-A- '- ''r«:- i. I-: m m W!-'* n. The Metropolitan Council's Role: What Should Its Concerns Be? When it wM created, the Metropobun Council was hailed nationwide It wm viewed by ‘ocal fovenunent leaders around the couiMry as a harbinger of providing possible soiuiHins to questions ttut were beyond a city's scope yet not of staewide significance The Metropolitan Council was seen as a regional approach that blended local governance wnics with regional ser>nce delivery approaches The hallmark of these years was delineating areas ihM needed a region wide approach The Council had the vision to foresee such areas and then recommend the unplemenuuon method. Within 10 years of us tneepboa. tlus vomm resulted in the Metropobtan Waste Control Commission, the Metropobtan Parts and 0pm Space Commission, the Metropobtan Sports Factl'ues Commission and the Metropobtan Housmg and Redevelopment Authonty. As the years progressed, the scope of the CouiKifs activities increasingly shifted. Instead of vision and ovcrsighl of regional a^ncies. the Council became more enmeshed in the details of operauon and iffiptementation. For example, rather than «]vocating a comprehensive regional approach to solid waste, the Council is engaged dirKtly in managing an elahtxate system of grants II It It R>-€mDhasl2e a Visionary Role The Task Force recommends that the Metropolitan Council should scire upon this earlier ability to identify the problems of the future and outbne steps and consequences of solving those problems. This metropobtan area needs a strong voice and strong leadership to help guide the area into the future. The Metropobtan Council ha.s the opportuniiy to help advaxKc the metropolitan area into the next century. It should not hesitate to scire the opportunities to explore aspects of metropolitan bfe and living, and probe them, not to do so could mean stagnation for this area. Regional Demands, Regional Thinking The Metropolitan Council - as well as cibes in the me^ - r ~ ‘ ■ <*>^3 ' should think and act globally. Sevenl natineal surveys lux the Twin Cities area as an up-and<oming region in international trade. People outside of the metropolitan area do not sec separate communities; rather, they see 'The Citks'’ or The Twin Cities Area." The Council should be able to help promote this view of the region as one entity. As the Twin Cities metropobtan area moves toward the 21st Century, it will face situabons where a number of choices are posstbk. How the area responds to these situabons and which choices are made win determine the degree of success the area has in participabng in the wtvld economy. The Metropolitan Council must be toe body that foresees these cnbcal junctures at which choices must be made, clearly ddioeaies what the choices ate and ouibnes the ramiricauons of the alternatives. The role of outlining choices lias at least two aspects: 1. In any situation, "do nothing" is a choice. This choice has ramificabons. Not having a regional body b ing out <Mher alternatives means that the "do nothing" choice increasingly becomes the decision that is made. J The lack of a regional body that identifies cnbcal situabons and outlines the range of choices does not mean that the function will not be undertaken. Groups such as the Citizens League. League of Women Voters, private business and the education establishment will identify some sibiations and some choices. The problems with this scenario arc that some situations would be missed (meaning "do nothing" is the course of action) and the range of choices would be bmited when a situation is identified because of the nature of the group(s) examining the issue. ;ri^; i; ;“-r t; 1 V,' I I*. ::5^. . I^v' |- 0 ^■Vs"- rh There are many ways thai ihe Meiropoliun Council can exhibit forward ihinJung leadership f or example, the Council could appoint a permanent Viskjos (or Long-Range Planning or Futures) Comomtee. smilar lo such committees in both the pubbc and private sectors, to develop pvissible tracks that the Council should consider. It is the Task Force's opinion that this commtnee would be the pnncipie of the Meoopoliiaa Council. The Task Force would urge that committee members be notated to provide fresh otHlooks on matters. This committee ma-< up of Council members also should have ' fT aiitsdupoaaL Rir any «j**»«*^ it examines, the Metropolitan Council should be able to conceptualize a plan of action aid develop a strategy for aclueving that plan. The Task Force believes the Council should neither dnuedy impicflMnt nor operate Us course of action in most cases. To do » could stifle its ability to i—.a IQ icview aid *«>■«««* avenues and consequences of courses of actioa that couli be taken to anidpnle aul leact to efnerging probkmx it also ooukJ result in ensts-dnven management in which the problem wniM be erroneously klentiried and the recommended solution would be. 'Metropolitan Council win take care of U by making it a regional sysrem.* Were the Council K> adopt a vtsionary role, ideally policy and accompanying strategies would ^mng from its vision Morp Tlm« to Look to Futurn, Address the Present By ipendHif BMce tine n developuig issue areas and possible soluuons. members would move away from dirrer invoivement in the operauon of a regional system The Metropolitan Council could recommend action in a varieiy o( neas: developmcni of a regional system without a regional agency to operate U, creation of a regional agency or commission, suggest that the opportunity/problcm be mariiicd on a subregional or a statewide basis, or. in some instances, recommend that nothing be done. To be truly viaronary. the Metropolitan Council must be allowed lo spend more time thinking creatively and thoroughly examining issues. Because of expectations by the Legislature, local officials and the Govmnor’s Office, the Metropolitan Council has not been encouraged to act as a think tank in its exammation of questions of significance to the metropolitan area The Council, for example, could examine the area's demographics to help it map a plan to address the aging population, deteriorating neighborhoods or shifts in housing stock. The Council members mue be leaden in creating visions for the metropolitan community. Sometimes that vision may conclude there is no metropoiiian significaiKe of any consequence. But the important thing is that the Council looks for and studies questions of metropolitan significance. History has shown some matten of scope and vision did not always come from the Metropolitan Council's vision. For example, the piuh for the world-class Minneapolis Convention Center came from Minnc apolis business and civic teaders, not the Metropolitan Council's foresighL ITT- Metropolitan Council's Constituencies: Getting to the Customer Once the Council is allowed to return to its role of a futurist, it must explain and defend i s positions to its constitaaicies. Who are its constituencies? The Metropolitan Council’s constituencies should be the people of the metropolitan area. The Council shottld be accountdile to the metropolitan area - cities, townships, counties, businesses, legislators, and moft importantly. Us residents of today and tomorrow. Its message to its constituencies should be: The Metropolitan Council is not a stale agency. It is a regional planning and visioning agency that will help develop the best possible environment for metropolitan area residents, businesses and visitors. It also is a vehicle that will help foster intergovernmental cooperation. V. Whik its consotuencies encompass the fnctropHiLin area j’opulaoon. the hulk ot the deljvers oi services is hMdled by local units of govenunem. Toe Council s ctteciiveness m uJenutvinji. and responding to tfv of T of metrop of«*an stgmficance wosild be determined significantly bv the effecovencss of kvaJ units of govenunem vtth which it works CowKil members need to evaluate how c1<k to the memipclitan residents (or customersi the level of servKC delivery should be The Task Force believes the Coun».il should acovely work to get ckies and other orgamzauoas involved as much as possible in the delivery If a local avenue vest not availabk. then a metro i^ency could provide the service in whole or in pmt as necessary. If the issue is regional, then a regional answer is needed If not. then a subregional ffiMt of government should address the matter The Council needs to remain informed about what its constituents think about services and who delivers them. The Task Force recommends that Council members and staff meet and work with city officials and oi^iloytes to provide assistance as needed and to get a kxai per^iective on issues In addition to rocetvtaf mote mformanon on a particular matter, the face-io-f;u;e meetings would build good will and siqipon that Council may need on other matters Aaolhcr metho d of learning about subregional concerns would be a 'swap* of personnel for a designated lUBC. For esanple. Council planners could work for cutes and vice versa. Once the exchange ts completed, the affected personnel would bring a different perspective bac k to the Council and back to the citiea. allowuig for better undentanding between the two bodies IV. Metropolitan Govp»-nancc: Who Does What? !- - V.; One <rf the nujor problems that the Task Force sees as h.unpenng the current governance system is involvement by everyone possible in every issue area Thercfvirc, it is difficult to determine who is taking the lead on regional issues. The Task Force suggests these parameters for the following units of government: T he L kcksla TUEE: The Legislature has the responsibility of coordinating the state's education system for K-12 Mid higher education, human services, state tax policy, statewide transportation, and those leiswe services of statewide impact The Legislature has a cntical role in creating an atmosphere within which the metropo litan area can function, e.g.. whether to add mother regional system or modify the geofnfitucal area under the Council's mfluence. Once an operating decision is made, however, the Legislaiure needs to step back and allow its decision to be implemented. •liiinl ill*atlon: Reviv Housa Matropolltan Affairs Committee The Task Force recommends the House of Representatives reconstitute its Metropolitan Affairs Committee of the late 1980s as a counterpart to the Metropolitan Affairs Committee in the ScttMe. Membership on these committees would be predominantly metropolitan legislators. The Task Force b:lieves that such a committee should address the current lack of a sufTicient legislative forum for consideration of public policy issues of unique metropolitan significance. Metbopoutan Council : As stated previously, the Metropolitan Council has the responsibility of envisioning opportunities, tkvelt^ing strategies for meeting those opportunities and oversight of the regional agency or commission that implements the strategies. By "oversight,* the Task Force means Council would state the purpose of regional commissions and agencies, review long-iange r-- -i- r h- v/> !y; ''•• r •iii- ■? -i-Sv; .. isi^ implcmenution and sniegK pUms. and revic-* and approve long range capnaJ budgeu It aJv> *ould be responsiMc for representing agencies under its purv«» at ibc suie government level RacommtndaHi Hill latlon of Issue Areas The Meiiopoliun Council has legitimate concerns about certain aspects of the metropolitan area The predomuittu purpore of the CowKtl is to facilitate the coordinated planning and developmefU of the metropoliun area. The CouncU and its agencies also can provide region wide awYKes (without (hipiicaiing those provided by local govemmeitt i that are beyond the of loc^ governmental uniU to implement individually or jointly and provide region wide plar*i"t as necessvy and tn cooperation of affected local government uniu. The Task Force believes the Counctl should cononue to facilitate discussions tn areas that affect the quality of life in the netropoLnan area. They are * ■ —* Use PiMMg aad Growth Man^oieut: Review of local comprehensive plans and whM growth issues as related to the regional impact of new commercial, industrial and ho ising devclopraent Thu includes the pubbe infrastructure system of schools, parks, streeu. sewer.. public and the accompanying public expenditures and services that arc demanded when whan growth »id development occurs. Growth management issues should continue to be \yf ^ Metropolitan Council to ensiae cooidinated and compatible suburban growth pnnems and to avoul ‘le^'^frog* development. • Housing, Community Preservation and Neighborhood Revitalization The enonnous inveiimenu in urtiun infirasiructure (schools, parks, streeu and public uuhties) throughout the iffyUTOfniitM area must be preserved. Also, housing stock and healthy communities must be preserved. In some cases, urban decay has begun. This decay manifesu itself in commercial/industrial decline and in dctcnorating conditions in housing The social-economic and political implications of such decay axe far reaching and ducctly impact the overall rcsc'urtc base of the metropolitan area. Regional strategies should be developed that address both the preservation of housing and inAastructuit systems, and the more intensive efforts that are needed to reclaim communities alrendy experiencing decline. Oppormniues should be established that would encourage capital reinvesttnent in declining areas. • Riirironmfnf wastewater treatment, solid waste management, surface water management, au and water quality issues, polluted lands and dumps. including airport, highway and transit planning and regional rail authorities. • Humau Resources: The Task Force recommends that the Council not become directly Mgagatt in the delivery of human/social services, includinf health care. It should be involved in piyMiiag bow the services could be delivered more efficienUy and effectively This could educatkv»al matters as well. The Metropolitan Council as constituted now has a pioblem entering into discossions about education in the metropolitan area. However , a visioning role would give Cconcil an easier entry into these deliberations about the quality and future of ,i‘i m lit • Public Safety Support: jails, communications (including 911), emergency preparedness, bomb squads. SWAT teams and hazardous material response teams. ___» - '-X- li: k b • Rccrtatiooai and Lctsvrr Services, regional parka, culainl anJ spiTung facilities, conv^uon cenitrs and Ubrancs and their impasi on the metmpi'iiUf> jj^ca in general and tiost cooMBanities in pamcular RBCION al Agencies : The Metropolitan Council will have an increased role m visioning and a decreased ia roittine openoons. It would rely upon the make-up of the regional agencies to carry out the vtsion. Theiefoie. the regional agencies must be le-exaimned to determine >khether they are. indeed, providing m legiofiai issues and are responsive to the Council s direction The Council would have ovemgM role in m agency s long-nnge planning and review, appoint members and hoards, and review both capital and operating budgets. iliili iliM ition: R#-dgfifw RRQlonal Agencies and Their Responsibilities The Task Forc would recommend that the following acuoo happen with respect to regional functions • TIm MilinpoliHa Parks and Open Space CoMmisskia and the MitropolitaB Waste Control Commiitfon should remain. Each was developed to meet specific needs in the regions. Md they continue to carry out theu cmguial intent - rbe Mctropoytnn Sports Facilities Conmissiofi would be removed from metropohtan consideranon. The Council has a sgntficani role stung a regional sports facility Once the fiKility is tiled, however, the Council should end its involvement to allow the ernes involved to hanifle the day-to-day operations and direct oversight. • Modify the statt» of the M^ropolitan Airports Commission so it is clear that M.A.C is a regional agency, not a state agency While the Task Force rtali/cs the Minncapolis/St. Paul Aiipm serves the whole state, the Task Force must note that the commission does not control airports outside of the metropolitan area It dixs not have statewide financial backing. Its decisions have significant impact on tne metropolitar area The l-ffiid Use Advisory Committee Becomes the Land L'se Cum mission. This commission would review siting questions, amendments to a city's comprehensive plan, environmental leviewa aad proposed projects trf metropolitan significance. This change alone would free the Cmmcil from a significant amount of the detail irork it currently urdeitakes. • Rcorgnniic the transportntion and ansit structure and operation in the region. Regarding the question of transit and transportation in the metropoUtan area, the Task Force would note that the area has the Metropolitan Transit Commission, the Regional Transit Ekmd and regional nil authorities all adifresstng transit issues. Because these separttc entities have individual missions as well as overlapping concerns, metropolitan-wide coordination of transit and irans|>ortation matters is lacking. The Metropolitan Council has the overall responsilnlity for the transportation network in the metropolitan region, including airports. light rail, roadwajrs. and conventional people-moving transit means. This is an issue that the Task Force must revisit before offering any recommendatioas because of the complexities inherent in transportation and transit que .’•^1 )V • The need for rcgioual commissioas on housing, surface water managemcat and solid waste rr lid be evaltimed. The new responsibilities also could be assigned to an existing u It should be noted that the AMM has policy statements regarding these issues.commisi C ounties : Counties are the local administrators of state-mandated services. Counties have handled human services needs, including health care, and the cnminal justice system including courts and jails. If ‘I. 0^ h«Mfle tteJt utas. it may hc^) case ihe overtnirdemng of ctoes that feel compelled to offer aimlar services. The Task Force believes the .ounues should conunue ihcu delivery m the areas of hum» services »d cntmtul jttsocc. Counties should be reancted in their delivery of transit and proper services. The Task Force believes iha the delivery of tranai and propenv related services should be f»^ar ni«v e4 sriih an eye toward eliminating duplicated services that area delivered by a city, county or a regional e«^. CmB: The role of cities ts k> jaovide those $«vices necessary *o promote the health, safety and welfare of then lesideats. These responnbUities would include such areas as property rebted vervicc land-use ilk safety, economic development, recreation and local tiansporuuon^ r Townsidfs: The Task Force has not spent ngnificani tune reviesning the role of townships, but will do «o in the oomtaf months. V. Council Membership and Operation: Serving its Public How andwrity the Metropolitan Council has depends largely on its accountabUity to us consHtnencies. The perception is that the current Metropolitan Council seemingly is accountable to When by Task Force members about its audience, several Council members said the Legisianne mmI tfiea the general puMk; legislators saul the general public, then the Legislature. Thc^e coROmhctions ui accouniabiliiy helped contribute to the lack of enthusiasm it receives from ti 8). Diacuassons by the various paneb of Council members, past and present Council chairs, legislators, coiaity commission representatives and ‘good governroeni’ Council watchers, indicated that a change should be made in the method of setecting Cuunal members. Panel participants cued, among other Ihingi. account, bility. crodibility and freedom from legislative restraints, real or imagined. Also. Council elections would force metropolitan voters to think about the region as a whole. R>cQmm#ndation: Direct Election of Council Members To give the Council the authority it needs to pursue a regionai agenda, the Task Force recommends that each member of the Metro^itan Council be elected by district from 16 tiairicts ttf equal or near equal population. The terms would be four-year and staggered, and CbiBictl members could tun for no more than two consecutive, four-year terms. By having staggered limited terms, the Council would have new ideas and input, while safeguarding against the amount of influoce any one person (or groups of persons) could wield. pwtimn would be wm-paitisan. Filings would be conducted at the Secretary of State's office, rtmpai giw would bc pubUcly financed. Candidates would not have Ihe option of raising their own funds The positioia would be purt-ome. with commensurate pay. with no provision for per diem. The Task Force does not envision Cbuncil membership as a luU-time occupation. However. Council members should be expected to commit enough time to serve their constituents well. The receiving the majority (50 percent piw s one) of the numbci ^' otes cast would be the winner. If there is no majority winner, the top two vote-getters would f.? .'•ther in a runoff election. A candidaie's name may be placed in nomination one of three ways: JLW--------- m-%■ •V .•■'V- I. Seif-fK^nination by a pcutjoo of I percent of voters regis*»ered wuhm the distrtcL VenficaiK>n of the ugn:uure3 would be conducted b> ibe county audtu>r s eiecuon office or 2. A revilitfion of endoncnicnt and nominatjon bv the cit> and town councils and or count' boards itpreaentuig x percentage of residents in me Mcttojji?hun Counctf * The councils or buirds each could nominate one candidate per distnci or 3. A nominating process through wluch a majonty of legisLuors rrpresenung the Mecropoltcan Council disrict nominate a candidate for that district The legislators could nominate one candidate per district An incianbent need not repeat the petuion nor lesolution pnxess. although vbe may seek endorsement if desired. However, county boards and city councils may pass a resolution of endorsement for another candidate. Should a vacancy occur, the sitting Council would fill the vacancy by selecting a person from the list of persons as nominated above. The person xlected to fill the unexpired term may seek a full term on the Council at the next election. ftl 4n*iii)iik 111*lation: R#vis# Council Chair. Daily Operations. Appointments The Council would be ide facto think tank. It would need the expertise of a management staff to help the Council maintain its vision and not become caught up in the paperwork. The Task Force recommends the Council should elect its chau biennially from within the Council membership. In this way. the Council, sitting as a board of directors, would be able to develop policy and not be directly involved in its implementation. Under this system, the Task Force also recommends that the Council strengthen the authority of the Executive Director in running the day-loslay operations. The Executive Ducctor would be accountable to the enure Council. The appointment larxess and structure of all metropolitan agencies should be re-examined under this new procedure. The Task Force recommends the Council appoint all chairs and members to regional ageiKies under Council's puview. and that the appo ntments should be for fued terms. When comiderinf appoinunv nts. Council should appoint members who have a demonstrated knowledge of the sub^t am. If an agency has an executive director’s position, that posiuon would be appointed by the agency board. The Task Force also recommends the Council review opertting budgets and approve capital budgets of its operating agencies. The Council develops the concept and plans the strategies to meet the concept's demands. Regional agencies handle the impiementatk n and operauon of those strategies. The Task Force believes that the Council should set ovc^I standards and goals for their agencies and provide oversighL If problems occur whhin an igeiKy. the Council should become involved to the extent of helping to resolve the situation, even if it aneans removing fw cause, if necessary VL The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities: Its Role The AMM would have a role of offermg input to the Metropobtan Council and its Visions Committee. This approach would assure that the onus of identifying opportumoes/ixoblems and methods for addreaung them arould not fall solely upon the Metropolitan Council. The AMM would help formulate these concepts; the Metropolitan Council would be the forum by which the concepts are developed. The AMM also could become a facilitator of discussion with other entities regarding the development of issue areas. Too often an idea is rejected out of hand because a proponent sometimes would be the developer and/or overseer. In such an instance, it may be easier for the AMM. given its historical m '■mSpf’. i.i*'^'A'•>" fv ti'Mk pFl^- telaiionship widi the Metropolitan Council, to act as the liaison between the Metrepohtan Council and another enut> when a new concept ts proposed In this way. the concept could be accepted >.« rejected on to tee. not because of the mesKnfer. An arfauizatioa such m the Af-IM sbo could facUitaie discussions with Minnesota ernes now considered of tile Mtimpoliiei Council's geographK boundaries. As population and transporuuon issues go beyond die traditioiul boundanes of the current metropcriiian area, and as soactv becomes more global in o*w»#*ept. cities otjlsidc cf the rCjj»vM» tiiay f^ay >stal roles in the Twin Cities area (Revised: April 13.1992) (Revised: April 16.1992) (Revised: A^ 20.1992) (Revised: April 27.1992) (?.evieed: April 30.1992) (Revised: Msy 11.1992) (Revised: May 14.1992) fel . T .. .. I I • i 5-' ■ >■<.. '.■.■• (,■>. .1 .'‘iSpfc: ^|g. F.< * m&: • liSiSs;': t t^- ■ 'm p:"-' ■' if.:-;? ly^i& ?mm'msM|viV<4:u^- ^?i;. % ^ '<< Ojf <■>, AGENDA •''h COOMCIL WORKSBSSION MONDAY, JONB 22, 1992 6:00 P.M. 1. Metropolitan Council Rural Development Policies ^ flof^ftfAATiof^ PPtOl^ /Vrr^f+pftT^ . A .p \>'k r-t: u.. r«• i ■ fe>-S*<sf^P'^i- Tos Mayor Peterson and Orono City Coun-il Ron Moorse, City Adt^ini3trator FroB Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planninq & Zc.i.'^a Administrator Date:June 10, 1992 Subject: Council Work Session - Met Council Rural S'^rvice Area Policies - 64/640 Barb Sennes from the Metropolitan Council staff will be attendinq the work session at 6:00 p.m. on Monday, June 22nd. She will make a short presentation regarding the new Met Council Rural Service Area Policies and then will answer questions. iry of Hew Policy In 1991 the Metropolitan Council adcpted new rural service area policies for development outside the MUSA line. Approximf- ely 3/4's of Orono's land area is out? le the MUSA line. It is staff's understanding based on the attached documents ("Implementation of New Rural Policy", "Amendments to the MDIF/Po1icies for the Rural Service Area") and the February 27th Planning Forum that Met Council intends to require Comprehensive Plan modifications from cities whose plans are inconsistent with the new rural policies. A kay issue for Orono appears to be the rural density maximum of one unit per 10 acres, or 64 units per 640 acres. The attached Information suggests that it may be a few years before the policy changes are required as part of a "systems plan revision". At such time that revision occurs. Met Council wo ’’ i issue a Systems Statement requiring local governments to amend Comprehensive Plans if they ere inconsistent. However, they also suggest that a major Comprehensive Plan Amendment sulmission might result in Met Council requiring plan modifications before such future Systems Statement is issued. Of concern is the fact that Orono has submitted a Comprehensive Sewer Plan Amendment which Met Council has determined is incomplete, and they have liherefore not made a final determination whether this is a minor or major amendment. They have requested that staff provide additional Information which we expect to provide before the end of July. We would then expect a determination of whether this is a major or minor amendment shortly thereafter. As noted in my May 18th memo. Met Council's apparent intent is to have cities count residential units on a section by section basis, and for sections which exceed the density of 64 units in 640 acres, will expect Comp Plan changes that severely limit additional development in those sections. r (y it'v: ■ k w-^ f’*' s' 11. w- % .n- ''•' vV _, i/-' k&r ' r’i'-■VV . Memo June 10, 1992 Page 2 A review of the existing development suggests that while a few sections have not yet reached the 64 per 640 density, the current overall density for our rural areas is approximately 90 per 640. Any attempts to limit the future development in our 2 acre and 5 acre zones will without question create an uproar amom c- rrent large parcel land owners who expect to some day be able to develop it to 2 acre and 5 acre densities. Questions The following would seem to be appropriate questions to be asking the Met Council: 1.What is the time frame in which Met Council expects to initiate requiring compliance to the new policies? 2.If the 64/640 policy is required, what specific allowances are there for continuing our existing developments with 2 acre and 5 acre minimum lot sizes? 3.Doesn't Orono's ntensive program for septic system management provide adequate controls so that Orono could be exempt from the 64 per 64C standards? 4.Explain Met Council's concept of "rural to urban transition planning” in the context of a 2 and 5 acre lot size zoning scenario# where the City has no current or foreseeable intent to rezone to densities requiring urban services. t- .•■V-''/- A ■ .c* ■ .2 ' ; -Ir^' -•7iV ■ 7 ' pr ff'.- p To:Mayor Peterson and Crone City C'lupoil Ron Hoo'^se, City Adr mis*" rat. Fron:Michael P. Gaffron, Ai s'- Pla irvj & ;'onin'j Administrator Date:May 18, 1992 Subject: Metropolita' Council ? 64/640 ■ervire Area Policies - ’n ’991 the Metropolitan C« ( i Area policies for developtr Approxiaiately three-fourths of i *nc MGSA line. a-*.' ■ ted • ■ d *“ r.ew Rural Service the MUSA line, sa is outside the The Met Council intends -o r* re comprehensive plan difications from cities whose plans * inconsistent with the new rural policies. The key issue for Orono appears to be the rural density maximum of 1 unit per 10 acres, or 64 units per 640 acraa. In the ' *'nq run, if Orono doesn't comply with their guidelines, the type of sanctions which Met Council miqht employ could include refusal to allow n<»w connections to the Hatropolitan Sewer System. list of Exhibits A - Met Council 2/10/92 Memo B - 12/5/91 Policies for the Rural Service Area C - Notice and Aqenda from 2/27/92 Forum Discussion The Met Council has for many years held to the concept that long-term development with septic systems should occur with a density no greater than 1 unit per 10 acres. With our 2 and 5 acre rural zoning districts, Orono already has just over 1100 residential units on 7400 non-lake acres outside the MUSA boundary. This yields an existing density of 1.5 units per 10 acres or an average ..ot size of 6.G acres. At full development, which un. the current slow growth rate could take 20 to 30 years c- more, we would expect about 1800 rural units or 2.4 units per 10 acres (average lot size around 4 acres including wetlands). Met Council has indicated that communities should calculate the density section-by-section throughout the City, excluding surface waters (lal:es) and major metropolitan rights-of-way (Hi<9.iway 12?). Wliile t,.e Met Council would encourage clustering of residential development, heir intent is to protect agricultural and environmentally sensitive lands, leaving open space that could be efficiently developed a* higher densities in the future rather than at the present. They will encourage Metropolitar Co^r.ci May 10, 1992 Page 2 P u r a 1 ? p r V 1 ■ A Pc - 6 4/64C planning for “rural to urban t r an s x *: i on* areas they will support 1. 1 efforts to prevent deve Icprr.en t that s i r.^copat ible or inefficient for future urbanirat ion. However, they appear to be diametrically opposed to Orono's philosophy that development on 2 acre lots will adequately eliminate the no. d for future sewers and MUSA line extensions. None of this comes as a big surprise, the Met Council has been discussing 1 unit per 10 acres for many y#»ars. However, it appears that they intend to exert whatever limited authority they night have in attemptina to shape development as the metro are." expands. Perhaps the most disturbing impression I got at the February 27 forum was that in areas such as Orono and North Oaks, which have 2 to 3 acre minimum lot sizes and are slowly moving along the merry pathway of orderly development. Met Council would apparently attempt to limit any future density increases for sections which are already at the 64 p>er 6 40 density. Analyzing Orono's rural sections (Sections 2 - li and 25 - 36), only Sections 6, 9, 25, 29, 30 and 2^ have not reached the 1 per 10 density, but they are very close to it. Overall, orono currently is at a 1.5 unit per 10 acre density. Met Council apparently would eliminate adlitional density increases in those sections already at the limit, but might be willing to allow the developed portions of those sections to develop at the 1 per iO density. This all sounds pretty big brotherish? however, they do control the valve on the big sewer pipe that goes to Shakopee. X would encourage each Council member to read the December 5, 1991 amendments and the February 10, 1992 memo from Bob Overby regarding implementation of the new rural policy. We currently have a comprehensive plan amendment, including MUSA line revisions, before the Met Council, presented as a minor comprehensive plan amendment. This amendment does not include Stubbs Bay, which will have to be the subject of a future amendment, (and which does require additional flow into the MWCC interceptor), but does include the MUSA line amendment for the Long Lake sewer plant property, which the City has agreed to proceed with in a timely fashion. The Met Council planners have requestd a number of items of additional information, including breakdowns of sewer units between the Long Lake and Orono lift stations, estimated increase in sewered population and sewer construction by 5 year periods for the next 20 years and additional information regarding infiltration/inflow abatement. While they have not broached the issue of development densities, I would not be surprised if that ultimately enters into their review. • Again, please read the attached information. Isv L- ■■.-■■■' ■r.~Trr’ I?-. W. i mtf %■ r V;.. I m METROPOLITAN COINCIL Mears Pj'k Centre Z'O E F;fth St . S’ Paul. MN '. f • - '^r ^'.«o 4 ^ < DATE*Februarv 10. 1 9*?: TO;Metropolitan ar<J r.>r*n'u.n.i\ revCiOpment Lorr-r r’ce FROM;Research and Long Range F;j...v''g R. her: CHerh\) SUBJECT: IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW RI;r .\: P'OLICY INTRODUCTION On December 5. 1991. the Council amended the Metr.^cv’ntan Pevelopmer.: and Inve^tmeni Framewrk (\fDIF) to include r.e\v policies for the rural sc^^^ce area of the reg:on The nevv policies becam.- effective on the date of their adoptii'n The rural se.Mve .irea is that part ot the regiofi located outside of the metropolitan urban serv ^e i.'ea (Ml SA ma not designated tor commerciai ajnculiurc. The ne'* rural policy atfccts ' 'wnships or it.es that have areas ,n their communities that are in the Council's rural service area, and affects counties which ‘•t.isc luthvHiry (or an agreement with townships or cities) to plan and rone in 'he rural are.i t the .. untv The Council will hold a Planning Forum on Thursday, Februarv 2Tth at IX) a m. in the Council Chambers. The forum will explain the poiicv changes and d.scuss how ^al governmental unis should irjcocporate the new policies in their planning and zoning. A nc’tice inv'!U''a Icxal planning staff and consultants to attend the forum has been mailed Along with the piartmr.’ forum nonce, the (Council will send a copy of the i.e.v rural scn-tcc area poncies to r! local gvwernments n the rural service policy area A second p'lannmg torum will be ^eid somei.’'e in May. and wiu .uldress specific options for cluster development m the rur.i! area. ISSUES The purpose of this memo is to explain the following: L How will the Council review plan amendments from rural service area governmental units until metropolitan system policy plans are a.mended to reflect the new rural poiicv.’ ‘Ahat ' zsholds or criteria will the Council use to require a local government to modify a plan amendment that is not consistent with the new rural service area policy ’ NEW RURAL AREA POLICIES SUMNLKRY The new policy continues to uphold the basic rural density policy of one unit per 10 acres. However, many of the policy changes provide more options for local governments to use in their planning. There are two major changes that will affect how the Council reviews local plan amemlments as they concern the rural area policy and metropolitan sv-stem plans. The first significant change is that the policy states that the Council may require communities to modify plarts that are inconsistent with the new policies: The cumulative negative impacts of development that is inconsistent v.ith the Councils rural area policies may have a substantial impact on or constitute a substantial departure from metropolitan transportation and wastewater treatment systems plans. Therefore, the Council may require communities to modify comprehensive plans that are inconsistert with the [rural area) policies. adki r H- m I:- si? P:Hi r^"- ip0. ■■>m rNf^'.. Thij policy o a sjgmilcani c>-jngc from the .tij p,<: r. poo,,on, »htch d,d not c m-e......e inconsistency of developm- -t unde: the -.:-i ..... ,,,.e______ _ - ' departure from sssiem ptuns, Pte r.eu ptncn states the .ntent^n-o ^uoe -^lan .r^'Xe? -mprehensoe plans are .„coe.«.ent•..m^V Crural The second significant change is the re’A n<-' .-v pvnii o* »k ► • comply with all of the Counal s polices for the rura: area ^'mc a.r^fnun.ties cannot patterns that are inconsistent the polio' and ^rovidfi 3 offxe- -r ' Council to make exceptions to the policv where ;t mav be ^riferia tor ;-e m«ns for the C^nciJ to recognize hat'some rural area uommunit.es have ^re?dv'aiio"!r^ d^elopment at densities that exceed the Counc.rs one umt per 10 acre standard Zl . allows the Council to work with the community to negotiate an excen;,on to the r -i requirements. However, the Council ^1!! onlv allow t'^e ex-ertion .Hbr ^ ^ the critena in the new poIic>’ commumtv s planning (as COU.N’CIL AUTHORnT The Metropolitan Land Planning Act N(LPA Mmn Stat 54 473 S5l 4"; '.t"'" -oo nX" ■sriro;“ ;XT™ •."■ ■“ ■■■-"-• SKTSsx'sKKK.'sr .. X=;r:;prrr'x::.f^^ coro"^retem^r^f;; T"T ^PP^rcnl consislcncv ul the luT ^e CO. T'" '^<=»<’POI»»n development p“nn^r Mrt'h«e^ -"odtiy nnv comprehens.ve Me'rtS ^letoomeTr 'd 'po tan uevelopmcnt Guide. The new rural area policies will be referenced md .oc,r*ovcmme„t »“ ^*r.het pZ ““ The Council will then send every local governmental unit m the region a metroDolitan svx.i.m« ™nroS"hit ‘k^T‘ ^ P'“" Ihosfchttngesmay affect that local governmental unu. Section 473.856 of the MLPA nmvirii.« iKs.. i i ^ Siirp'^em1«“Xm"ioT “''“ J° ‘‘7 “' “'•’ether they need .0 emend thetr l«al ", plans to ensure continued conformity with metropolitan svstem Dlan<; If » ninn M for ‘r“ev?:r"" a^d^ubmh tfthe ' » ' ■ .-■ .:v' r^; I;:- ?i ■ ;i-rW-' ;;• - ^3,:i"r' k.rf c • p..-. ifIS’- PLAJS' amendment review PROCESS The Councjl has established separate procedures frr ■ : and ^ 'r pi.in e',;s A maior amendment is (1) (2) (3) (4) A complete revision, update or rewrite of an ex .stm^ comprehensAC p .sn .n .ts enti.'^eiv, A substantial revision, update, rewrite or addition to a chapter or element of an cxistmc comprehensive plan. An amendment triggered hr a propK.^sed deselopmertt that requ,.'-es an F \'A or EIS .ind .s inconsistent with the existing comprehensive plan, or A change (land trade or addition) in the urban service area involvini; JO acres or aunc The Council may require a local governmental unit to modiS' the amendment if the Council tmds that the plan will have a substantial impact on. or contain a substantial departure from, metropolitan system plans. The local government cannot implement the proposed plan amendment until after the Council has concluded ;ts review A minor amendment is: any amendment other that a major amendment. Minor amendments without potential system impact or substantial departure are subject to a (><)-dav review and comment period for consistency with the Metropolitan Development Guide The 'oca! government can implement the pioposed plan amendment hetore the Council has concluded its revie v. ISSUE ANALYSIS How should the Council review local plan amendments, and what thresholds or criteria should the Council use to require plan modifications under the ne** rar il service area policy ' Minor plan amendments Minor plan iimendments. by definition, have no substantial impact or departure from metropolitan system plans. The Council’s plan amendment guidelines permit the local government to implement the plan amendment before the Council’s review is ended. If the amendment is consistent with Council policies, further review is usually waived, or if minor comments are necessary, it is sent directly to the Council’s consent list. If an amendment is not consistent with the new rural area policy, staff would prepare advisory comments in a MCDC consent list report to explain the inconsistency. However, the local government could still go ahead and implement the plan amendment during the Council’s review Major plan amendments The following types of major plan amendments are most likely to raise issues relative to the new rural policy: requests for additions or changes to the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA); changes in rural area plans or policies; changes in the land use plan element, or changes in a sewrr or transportation plan element. If a major plan amendment is inconsistent with the new rural policies, the Council must determine whether or not it constitutes a substantial impact on or departure from the current n etropolitan system plans. If so, the Council may require the local governmental unit to modify if e plan. : ■ V- m' Ip ■'v'r The Council has nosi 'requcnrlv usej the -.^te-, rr-Kt' cr.ier on as the hisis 'or re’ainnc i »mn,un.i. .0 mcxl,f> „s compreher.s.ve plan rh i bee- narroislv ,n,e p'cxO o ne a h^r,r?S' •’"* - ' - r-' iv a tenet Honever'^'.he MLPA d«t no, lulhoriaes the Council to protect the tr.etropoioan tvatema from local ?,.Ik et nhi. n „e m- sutatinttally consistent *ilh metro system pmc ea "tteretore, the Counoi mas teauo- , fi',- l^tEcation based on a -substantial departure' from a ssntem plan e.en thouch the n'an o^s -o m ■'’“iT"'A memorandum -f (Vn«I by Assistant Counsel Brian Ohm esplams this broader mietpretji on ot the Ml n.y or non. ffO'h .1 system plan and if a mod,r.ca.ion should he requited inconsistency might be conside-ed -substantial- For example a plan ll^l^r^“nll^*‘ “ O' less imporam aspects of ^ 1 . * “"S''l«ed 'u be a substantial departure. Or. stated another nav ,. plan al-. ■“ ''em ».av except for one minor issue might noi n, considered a ^^irit^n* ' ' ^ ' '■""’-'"''V would no. be required to modify m- Bli a slblumSl H ,! 'he Council must relv on the existing o.stcms plans in order to etJferix^^T "'iscd ssstem plans will nclude more detailed critcna to indicate a lubstantixil departure related to the rural area policies. \ ■ ■ require modification of a l«a[ pla^thars'naf™".^!'nel' ,'',raTarea"pol'7"'’'' # .e- %_ R * » »Policy 1-2 of the Council's Wastewater Treatment and Handling Poiicv Plan states that rf :.v? - V- ,'/s OiMitc sewage disposal systems are appropriate to sei^e single familv residences at ^topment densities of 4 units per 40 acres or less, if governments plan for them and idopt a mana^ment and control system consistent w,th federal and state laws and Metropolitan Council guidelines". pw W acres. If ihe^uncil determines that a plan modification is needed, then the local f^ramem m^t nu^ify and adopt the revised plan and must adopt revised official controls (in Urn case, on-site ordinances) that are consistent with the modified plan. Policy 12 of the Council’s Transportation Policy Plan (TPP) states that: ’■ .r Metropolitan Council will work with the Minnesota Department of Transportation and local units of government to ensure the metropolitan highway system and its supporting road system are built and designed to adequately serve travel demand to the extent possible, to provide for the safety of users and to minimize negative impacts on the environment. ^ ^ .» V-’ ' *** V-I L:' P vi i^\ 6=',"' :'- ■T- 1^ itr-' fciM aP's-' ■ : i-;:vC?- B- - Strstct^ C ^r ^Jicy 12 state' that The Council will approve expansu n of t"c .r^ar. se-oce area onlv ..he-' -“c oa:c .mO or the appropriate local unit ot gCNcrnmer.; Jc'-orsi-r.c that aJc iu.r.e *' ^ i% improvements will be provided when neece ,1 'o jm J ex.ceo ,ap.K;tv ot the affected metropolitan highway Strategy E of policy' 12 states that 'transportation facilities should be planned. Jesigne operated to function in a manner compatible with ad'acent land use j.u The Council could use pKaiicy 12 to require a plan modilication m order to avoid a ;'otenii.il system impact, if the plan allowed development densities that would be inconsistent w.th the new rural policy. CONCLUSIONS Staff recommends that the Courcil use the following appr .Knes !v comprehensive plan amendments w ler the new rural area poiicits 1.The changes in MDIF rural area policy do not mean that the Councii may require ail communities to update their pians to address the new rural area policies. However communities may amend their plans if thev wish to take advantage of some ot the new policy options. Until the sx-stems plans are revised to reflect the policies or thereafter^ *ne decision to amend pians will be at the discretion of the local governments. This means that it will take several years before ail :ommunities adopt plans that comply with the new policies 2.In the period before the system plans are revised to reflect me new policies, the Council will review all major plan amendments to determine whether or not they m iv constitute a substantial impact on or departure from the current's adopted metropolitan systems plans, If the Council uses its authontv under the MLPA to require plan modifications m such cases, this action may accelerate local compliance with the new policies and ultimately would discourage additional development that is in conflict with the policies. 3.After the metropolitan systems plans arc revised, the Council will issue systems statements that will require local governments to amend their comprehensive plans if they are inconsistent Language will be added to the systems plans to reflect the rural area policies and to clearly indicate the criteria for determining whether or not a substantial impact or sul»tantial departure may exist. p;; Hi Ir £'.>.■ ■ -:r s< 1. •'M. . '■■M ■: ■■ w*' ■V' V-! ■•.: -• te"m ^'f» i': m-: l^.H:: iiS ??ais iPlil'" amendments TC THE METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENT framework (MDIF) POLICIES FOR THE RLTIAL SERVICE AREA Adopted Dci^wibei 5, 1991 Metropolitan Council Mean Park Centre 230 E Fifth Sl Sl Paul, MN 55101 Publication No. 640-92-012 Iv-- 4-‘ Em V5 ='-‘' , > - ,- f- Wf I - i-wft- % ANfENDMENTS TO THE METKOPOUTAN Dr-TLOPMENT AND INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK (MDIF) LNTRODUCTION On the pafes that follow arc amendments to the \fe:ropohtan Dnelopmem and !n\.estmen Framework (MDIF) that were adopted by tne Metropolitan Council on December 5. ]99I T'he amendmentt affect three sections of the MDIF New language is indicated by underlining . Language that was deletol from the MDIF is stneken (stfwken). Page? 1*9 o'" the amendments modify pages 22 25 of the MDIF. neginning with the section titled "Rural Servjce Area." This is part of the Geographic Policy- .Areas section of the .MDIF. and contains the policy statements. Pages 10-14 are modifkations to pages 3'-35 of the MDIF section titled 'Planning and Investment Procedures: the Council and .Vlctropolnan Systems.* This section gives direction for future revisions of other chapters of the Metmpoluan Development Guide: in tnis case, the IVastewater Treatment and Handling Policy Plan and the Transportation Policy Plan. A small change was also made to the section on parks which relates to the rural area. This change is being made now m order to incorporate policy direction from the recently adopted Regional Recreatum Open Space Development Cuide/Policy Plan. It is consistent with discussions of urban-generated uses, held in connection with the rural policy study. Pages 15-16 are two new appendices to the MDIF. The first is 'Criteria for Council Approval of Lo^l Plans That Arc Inconsistent With MDIF Rural Area Policies.* The second is "Land Uses in the Rural Area." This clarifies for the Council and local governments what land uses are appropriate for the commercial agricultural region as compared to the general rural use area. For additional copies of this document, for the Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework itself, or for additional background information, contact the Metropolitan Council Data Center, 230 E. Fifth St.. St. Paul, MN 55101; tclepi... e 291-8140. The MDIF costs S5; the other documents are free. Questions about the policy amendments should be directed to Anne HurlbuH of the Council staff, 29l-«01. t'- if- rI #■ t(/i' i-- ivfc" Gj I &.■ M--’ AMENDMENTS TO the: METROPOI JT.AN DEV'ELOPMENT .AND INTTSTMEN I FRAMEWORK (MDIF) PART ONE NroiF, Page 22-25 RURAL SERVICE AREA The focxis of the Councirs growth-manaeemg ni strategy ..Qf gncouris^LOg.. service area requires an accomoanvnng polic%' that limits i^rowth in the run[ arex—Lxtcnsi\e development outside the metropolitan urban serMCC area is not appropriate because it cnn le^g jo premature and costiv demands to extend regional set^ices such as sex^ers and highwav-s, and does not take advantage of regional investments that have been made in the urban service,.area^ Development outside the urban service area contributes to urban sprawl and increases the of seivices. Some services that require higher concemrmor.s o( people to he cost-etfecuve, lycli as transit, mav become prohibitively expensive. Development in the rural area also results in demand for local services, and can change jhe character of rural communities. While existing service levels may be low, new residents are likely to demand additional services. Development can result m erosion ot the natural and man-mnug that attracted residents in the first place. Conflicts often develop betvveen newenvironment exurban residents and residents who depend on aericulture for all or part ot their loelihoocls, Development in the rural area can have adverse impacts on the quality of the natural environment. Protecting and maintaining the quality of stirface water and groundwater is ajLev concern of the Council. While technological advance s have improved on-site disposal systems, their proper initallation and maintenance is still a critica' concerni A common misconception is that agriculture and other rural activities are onlv tern per aryJaPil w ---------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------- . . . i r i„'i -».ilinrF for the land 10 h« developed. Mosi of the rural a.ca will ncl be ne^dediai ..rh.n develoDmgnl in the foroeeable future Amcullufe and rural land ir.g^ are Icgilimate and permanent land uses in these areas. As the region gro>vs. there will be a need to expand the urban service area into some areas th^ are currently rural. There are potential regional. as_well as local,impacts from mapprppnate. development of the rural areas that mav be needed to expand the urban service area..__j| communities do not plan for their future urban setvice areas before development occurs.jLi^ possible that land uses and development patterns mav later block the contiguous, efficient g nd cost-effective extension of local and regional urban services . I’ The cumulative negative; impacts of doelopmert that is incorsistent wnh the Councii'- rural are.i policies may have a substantial imr:<ct on or constitute a suhstnnt;al dep.-^rtu rc from metropofit.Tn transportation .md wastewater treatment system s plans Therefore, the Council m.iv requ:re communities to modify comprehensive plan< that are inconsistent \*Tth the policies. Some communities cannot co:nplv with a!l of the Council's p«>hcies for the airal area because thev have existing development patterns that are inconsistent with the policy In the past, the CouncH has found these plans to be inconsistent with regional pv^licies. -ut has not provided a procedure for making exceptions to the policy where it mav be warranted. Cntena for Council aporoyal ot inconsistent plans a provided in an apoendu to this docurrent. Commercial Afiicultural Area The commercial agricultural area includes thise lands certified by local governments as eligible for agricultural preserves under the 1980 Metropolitan Agricultural Preseryes Act This approach places the responsibility for defining ->;ricultural lands on local governments. With Council protection policies for commercial agriculture focused only in areas where there are local government plans and protectiorts, al and regional policies support one another. The amount of land in'*’ided in the commercial agricultural area is large, covering about 600.000 acres in 44>8^1990. This constitutes over half the farmland in the seven county area. The geographic area defined as the commercial agricultural area is subject to frequent change when lied to *he Agiicultural Preserves Act because land can go into and out of certification when local governments decide to alter its status. Locai governments may replan and rezone certified areas if a change in {x>iicy is desired, but this change must occur as a public process, ’^or the purposes of this document, the commercial agricultural area is defined as the rrea certified as of March 1 of each year. This date is the end of each Council reporting year required under the Agricultural I'rcservcs Act. Under the Agricultural ’reserves Act, a local government passes a resolution certifying land eligible for protectioni and benefits and limiting housing density to one unit per 40 acres. The certified area is then considered long-term agricultural land. The local comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance must reflect this land use and zoning. Farmers owning land within the certified area may then enter the program. Land in the program is referred to as covenanted land. The Agriculture Preserves Act provides prott.^'tion for the farmer from urban assessments, property taxes at development value and conflicting land uses in exchange for a legal commitment to cont'nue fanning for at least eight years. Within the commercial agricultural area, all land has been certified by local governments as eligible for the agriculture preserves program. Howev'er. the Council recognizes two levels of protection in the commercial agricultural area: primary and secondary protection areas. Primary protection areas are lands covenanted as agricultural preserves. They will receive the greatest protection possible am incompatible uses because the greatest level of commitment to farming has been established. 'J' rO k r‘‘ Secondan ’ protection areas cover the tarrns in the Kca that have not -f cover ani^: 25 agricultural preserves. The Council believes the commercial agriculture area ls a place '*here agriculture ;s the best permanent use of the land. Long-term investments in farm equipment and m land preservation can be made with the confidence that urban development is not going to destroy or limn these investments. General Rural Use Area The r .icral rural use area is the area outside the urban service are" hat is not designated for commercial agriculture. Over 40 percent of the land in the Metropoi..an ,«\rea falls in this category. TliC area contains a wide variety of land uses, including agricultural residei.tial and urban-type facilities. Tnere are sizable parts of the general rural use area that host no particular kind of land use-land that is often called unused. Most of the area looks rural, but many ot us residents are tied economically to the urban area and many of us land uses provide services to people living in the urban service area. ithin th» ar <»a i General Farmland A large part of the general rural use area is devoted to agriculture. The Cocncil supports the continuation of agriculture and encourages local governm.ems to support it o> zoning agricultural land at one unit per 40 acres. For farms within an area so zoned that ar^ .ubscquently cernh^l eligible for the agriculture preserves program, the Council will reclassify them as part ot the commercial agricultural area. Rural Residential Development Rural residential development 6on 6i6tf ^ homes on iar g»k>*s mav an appr^r.atc land^use _in areas that are hilly, wooded or otherwise unsuited to agncultural production. The Council urbaaiaatioii. The CouncU supports this type of use as long as the density docs not exceed one housing unit per 10 acres of land. The Council will compute rural residential density on the basis of 640-acre parcels fone square mile or section based on the pubije land survey). This will pr^nt excessive clustering of a large number of homes on small miniimim lots that wzes. n-ithin thfl Th« rr>nnril oppofi M such clufitenng could result in theWIUllll-tmj mwiuii ------------------ need for urban services, such as package sewerage disposal sy-stems. Some communities in the rural area have significant land area in public parks and open space , or wetlands that ..re legally restricted from development. Others nave protected large amoun^.^ agricultural land bv designating it part of the commerc ial agricultural area. The Council wUl recognize this when it applies the density po licy. Lower densities in areas restnctedjr^ development mav be used to balance higher densities in sections without such linuta tigns, it does not result in excessive clustering that would create , demands for services (such.^ —“T and water systems, storm sewers, roads and o ther urban services) not tvE ically needed_in ■ V, ;■ . ^ ( It P’ ".<. . |r;’ h. ^r- iU.f*' Iv:f-' Wv- Ki-..’- 7 ’fi. fe I V"' ^t- ir/ 8- P yi'V. iM ■ 'tural develoorrents. The only arejs th.it wii e excluded n :h:s ceicuLitir'n jre .surface H.uer ?nd major metropolitan highway nghts-of-wav The Council encourages communities to imrlcTient the density standard through clustering where aPDropriate and consistent svith local planning objectives. Implementing the densirv standard as a 10-acre minimum lot size is simple to administer, but mav result in an ineffiaent development pattern and in more land removed from agricultural production than if smaller lot sires are used Qustering mav aid in adapting the densirv colicv to the diverse character of the landscape. Some areas have lakes. vMetlands. wildlife areas, large areas of public lard.s or difficult soil conditions that make clustering mere desirable. Other areas have good .agricultural land that can be protected through clustering, and used to halauce the den.sitv of dev elopment on areas less suited to apiculture. The Council does not recommend a minimum lot size. Lot sizes in the general rural use area should be determined bv performance standards. At a minimum, they shall ensure at least tv^o sewaye disposal drainfields on each site, a primar-v Jraintleld and a replacement should the original system fail. All residential development in the general rural use area must be subject to the standards for proi?er design, location, installation, maintenance and on-going monitorine provided bv the Council’s Wastewater Treatment and Hnniilimf Policy Plan to ensure against negative impacts on the environment and the metropolitan wastewater treatment system. Existing Urban-Density Development Residential subdivisions, mobile home parks and clusters of moderate-density residential development also exist in the general rural use area. They frequently demand urban services but are in locations where urban services are difficult or costly to provide. The Council’s principal concern is the potential need for the costly extension of central sanitary sewer and particularly metropolitan sewer service. The Council supports development in the g eneral-fufal use area eoBgiatut with seivtce tevete appropfiete fof-a rural area. Local governments with existing urban density development should address the operation and maintenance issues of on-site systems to avoid potential problems and the eventual need for costly local investments. Urban-Genemted Uses Many facilities exist in the general rural use area that require isolated and spacious locations but may be intended to serve the urban or entire metropolitan area public. These facilities include campgrounds and recreational vehicle parks, regional parks, trails, waste disposal installations, racing facilities, gun clubs, festivals, mining sites and similar facilities, and are usually public or ouasi-Dublic in nature. The general rural use area is an appropriate location for these facilities. The Council’s interest is that these facilities are provided with adequate public services adequately Mfvad, consistent with local and regional plans, and to the extent possible, that they do not interfere with agricultural activities. Other Land Us« In addition to agriculture, single-family residential development, existing dex'elopment and urban- generated uses, there are other land uses that mav be appropriate in the g^meral rural use area. Whether or not a land use is appropriate depends on whether it is consistent with local and '4^ m:h ■ U c- 0-f ■', regional plan^ and if it meets all environmental uuaiitv standards. An arpropruite land use not require urban-le^’d support services fsuch as highv.a\^. transit or sevsersi UsfsjJiou]dJ::ejX-^ scale compatible with services :ivailjhle and the need to ser^e local market dem;ynds^_TLUilv; extent possible, they should not interfere wuh agricultural yjiyi.tjg.L One category of land uses that mav be approonate in the rural area is neighborhood conven ience retail, such as a grocery store or gasoline station. If it is of an ap propriate scale to serve local residents and does not need urban sev>ere or highways, it mav be appropria te m the 6ener3l_rur,i! use area. F.ven though a particular land use mav be acceptable from a regional pcnpectivc^Jhe CQuncjl wiH not recommend that every community provide for every possible land use in its rural ajeajfjt would not be consistent with local plans. Each community must determine whether parti cujii be compatible with existing uses, local standards and the goals of the com munity Ml !ses would be subject to anv local, regional or state permitting or licensing requirement^ Fj amoleit that mav be acceptable are included in an appcndixjo this document^ lot lizes for all land uses should be determined bv performance standards. At a minimum, thev should ensure at least two sewage disposal drainfic lds on each site, a prirparv drainfield and _a should the original system fail. All development in the general rural use area mus| ■ ‘ location, installation, maintenance and on-goingbe subject to the standards for proper desiai monitoring provided bv the CounciPs Wastewater Treatment and Handlim Police Plan to ensure against negative impacts on the environment and the metropolitan wastewater treatment svstern Rural Centers Rural centers historically have served as retail service centers and transportation centers for the surrounding rural area. However, changes in agriculture and rapid urban expansion have changed the traditional rural service roles of many of these small centers to residential areas for urban people and lo'’v.tions for industries with little tie to local agriculture The latter make use of available lab ir n • .i J areas and, by their nature, tend not to be depenaent on close contact with other firms fo: tiir . * upplies or critically dependent on transportation. The Council has identified 35 rural centers, with populations ranging from just over 100 to more than 5,000. Some rural centers, such as Norwood and Young America, encompass the entire corporate limits of the community. Others, such as Lake Elmo, arc small enclaves within a larger rural community. Services avadablc within rural centers vary. Some have central sanitary sewer; others depend on on-site waste disposal systems. Some have central water systems. Some provide the full range of convenience retail stores, while others have only a bar or gas station. Some have small manu&cturing or service businesses; others arc almost exclusively residential. The Council does not support the extension of regional systems to rural centers because of the distance from the urban center the small populations of rural centers. Rural locations in the past decade have been attractive and some, although not all, communities have experienced an upsurge in growth, principally residential development Development trends are down from the highs noted in the early 1970s but continue at modest levels into the 1980s. V i ■ fi ;'^-r § '{i .\-Vm f- ’ • - ■< M::Xr »■■ -V^ isEfmm^ ^ Lmm. Several services arc important in adequately serving additional raral centei dc\elopment, but sewage disposal is the most critical. L'rban-density development m an unse\vered rural center poses the risks of on-site sewage system failure, contamination of groundwater and eventually the expense of new on-site or central sew-cr system installation. The possibility also exists that remedying a pollution problem may require an e.xtcrtsion of metropolitan sev-er service through rural areas. Lack of sewer service is a serious constraint on the amount and type of development that rural centers can safely accommodate. Some parts of the rural Metropolitan Area, especially Anoka County, arc receiving large amounts of scattered urban development This scattered development poses service problems and may, at a later date, 'csult in very high local service costs. The Council proposes a strategy that offers local goveminent an alternative way to structure this development by designating and creating a "rural center." These new centers would be limited enclaves for urban-density land uses, facilities and services within the local governments’ broader corpofaf iunsdictional boundaries. They would not be coterminous with the entire corporata iurisdictional limits. Under this strategy, a local government would identify an area to receive urban-density residential, commercial and industrial development and the facilities, including local central sewer, where appropriate, ‘eded to serve it. Financing of necessary support services would be a local responsibility. Areas of existing urban-density uses are likely candidates for selection as new rural centers. Rural centers should accommc'^ate additional development consistent with their ability to finance and administer services, including sewer, roads, water and stormwater drainage. If additional land is needed to accommodate growth, rural centers should extend .services in a staged, contiguous manner. Residential, commercial and industrial development at urban densities should be accommodated only in rural centers with central sanitary sewers that are meeting state and federal water quality standards. Larger projects should be located in freestanding growth centers that have a full range of services. Rurai-to-Urban Transition Planning Runl-to«urban transition areas are areas that may eventually be needed for expansion of the urban service area but are currently part of the rural service area. While these areas will not be considered a separate regional policy area, the Council encourages local governments to plan for potential expansions of the urban service arc., in their comprehensive plans. Communities planning for transition areas should consider land characteristics (such as soils, wetlands, watershed boundaries, agricultural soil capabilitv ’i. existing land use and development patterns, the transportation system, and long-range plans for expansion of local and regional utility swtemi. Tranritioo areas should yenerallv be contiguous to the existing urban service area. In most cases, it would not inclucte the entire iurisdictional limits of the local government, but might if the community wishes to plan for the eventual urbanization of the area. Land in a transition area should be protected from incompatible development patterns and land uses that mav later obstruct the extension of urban services. The most effective strategy to protect the transition area is to restrict development to very low-density (one per 40 or less) residential development or agricultural uses, which preserves large parcels intact until they can be subdivkied into small lots and provided with urban services. If residential subdivirions are lined, clustering should be encouraged. The large parcels remaining mav later be efneientiv'IHfuUiJ r tt' I P; Jfi.m'..'l! :'PI f' ')• !(i.im »i‘P k ’■ - fe. ft’’ *1’*, ■> :>.r‘ LL - , r;;-?’ * ji.. fM'- Ur I reaubdivided- and the smaller, clustered lots can be more economica!lv ^ro^lded.wlth ser. icgs.g bypassed if necessary. Local eovemments should use caution in implementing "ghosi plattine ’ or similar methods f<7i subdividintf land into large lots with the intention of resubdividing them when services are to be provided. Resubdivision and installing utilities in existing subdtyjsions can be a verv difficult and result in higher costs. The development pattern established mav not b<* appropriaie Oy ^esirable when the area is incorporated into the urba n service area. |/^| fovemments mav also want to consider whether the land uses permitted in transition aregs would discourage or prevent urbanization in the future. For exam ple, a use that requires a spacious, isolated locflfiffn probably not be located where it is likely to be surrounded by incompatible urban development in the future. The Coundl will review local comprehensive plans that include plans for ryral-to-urban trnnsitjon areas, but will not commit to the future extension of metropolitan servnees to setve the area or uj any time frame for expansion of services bevond the urban service area.—The Q9uncil,_^i|j ypnttnur to anolv its policies and criteria for expansion ot the urban service area when a region,nj need has been demonstrattxl. The Council will support local efforts to prevent development incompatible with future urbanizatiop. The Council will examine the need to plan for rural-to-urban transition.a reas in its.metropQl,,it_a n systems plans. Local plans will be considered but will not determine the transition arens designated for regional purposes. RURAL SERVICE AREA POLICIES The MetropoHtan Council does not support extensive development outside the iirbmi service area because it can lead to the premature expansion of local and regional services, and fails to take advantage of regional investments that have been made in the urban service area. The cumulative negative impacts of development that is iiKOnsistent with tha CownciPs rural area policies mav have a substantial Impact on or constitute a substantial departure fWwu metropolitan transportation and was tewater treatment systems plans. Therefnra. the Cnuncil mav require communities to modify comprehensive pinna that are inconsistent with the policies. The Cooncil wjU cpnsjder Lceptkms to the policies far local govemroents that ennnot meet the polidfs becaiise.of existing subdivisions or land development Commercial Afiicuituml Area 19$. The Metropolitan Council supports the long-term continuation of agriculture In the rural service area. The Council will use the following ranking in decisions to accommodate Ihcilltics serving urban residents. 1. Primary protection area: land covenanted in agriculture preserves will receive primary protection- Urban facilities should be prohibited in this area unless there .. • § N: •P Ir; t f!;p4:l ’■i' 7^. (ti•Mrmpp m iU‘ %■%. e-“ li1?7f|.Ip - r\ '■ ' -v'v, :.■ /• i*-'^ . P':> ■y'\Pr‘^^-'n?.. "A is strong documentation that no other locations in the Metropchian \rca can adcquttcly meet the siting arJ selection criteria. Secondary protection area: lands certified but not presently m agricultural preserves will receive a level of protection secondary to agricultural prcscrscs. Urban facilities should not be located in this area unless there is strong evidence that a proposed urban use cannot be located in the general rural use area. Gcaeral RaraJ Use Area lltfA. The Metropolitan Council supports long-term presermtkni of agricultural land in the gcnerul ninil use urea. However, the Council will also snpport residential development at densities of no more than one unit per 10 acres ONBpoted on a $4(>>acrc basis (a maximum of sixty four units per -tO e^res square mile bnsed on the nnhlk land survey). The Council will allow land area in public parks or open soace. wetlands that are Ie2allv restricted from development, and jgriciiltural land that Ims been desinnated as part of the commercial agricultural area to be used to balance hlnher densities la sections without such limitations, provided that It would not rfsnit !■ excesstvt dnsterinn that would created demands for urban services. The onlv areas that will be excluded from this calculation ore surface water and malor metwpolltan highway rjghts^-wav. m The Connell enconraaes dnsterina of residential development which win result in a efliclent development pattern and help to protect agricultural and environmentaHviilil. sensitive Iniids. Lot nerfbrmance standards. At a minimum, they shall ensure at least two sewa2e disposal dralnfltids on each site, a primary dminfleld and a replacement should the original sxmmiBiL 19C The Council will not extend metropolitan systems to serve urban-density residential devclopmeat in the general rural use area. Where urban-density development already exists, a local government should addras service issues in its plaa, particularly on-sIt sewer system operatioa and maintenance. 120*In addition to aericniture. single family residential development, existing development and nrbnn»aenerated nsea. the Connell will support other land uses In the general niml use area, provided that they are consistent with local and regional plans. Appropriate rural land uses mast meet all environmental aoailtv standards, not require urban-level sopport services, and be of a scale compatible with the services available and the need to serve local market demands. To the extent possible ther should not Interfere with aarkniturai activities. Rnral Centers 2S»The Metropolitan Conncil will snpport a rural center's plans to accommodate additional growth prewided they are consistent with the center's ability to finance and administer scrrtecs, particularly sewer service. The Conncil supports rural center service Improvements bnt not at regional expense. 8 1 pI Ep» .Ps"' lft?:VF-V:.m p- m’ w ‘^' ■I* :." ^ ' ■ K ■* &,:. mf-:-iir ;aivme 2Xd. The CouBcil will support a local government’s plan for a new rural center and its requests for state and federal grants, provided the local government restricts urban densities from surrounding rural areas and will support the new center with necessarv service investments. Rural-to»Urban Transition Planning 22. The Metropolitan Council will encourage local governments to plan for rural-to»urban transition areas in their wprebensive plans, and will support locni efforts to prevent develoimtent incompatible witii ftotnre nrbaniiatton. The Council will not commit to the fatnre tafewsion of metnwwHtan services to serve the aren until such time as there is a demonstrated, regional need in expand the urban service nren In accordance with established Council policies and criteria. Local plans will be considered but will not determine transition areas designated for regional purposes. is. IfempK.. mfmr Wfike , . . . .X L r ?■ I-e: m-0 pf 0^0- ^-00 ■'t^ Ft'-' '•■ » ^r-.' mImt :in:^- m- ■ fi".m"m:. PART TWO MDIF, Page 33-35 PLANNING AND IN\T:STMENT PROCEDURES: THE COUNCIL AND METROPOLITAN SYSTEMS The Metropolitan Q)undl is concerned with managing metropolitan sv-stems in ways that will help realize the objectives for long-term development of the region as reflected in this document's discussioo ol the geographic policy areas. The following metropolitan system guidelines provide direction to the Council’s systems for developing the more detailed policies and programs contained in the individual system plans. The metro governance process, discussed later, explains the procedures for carrying out the guidelines through the actioru of tr.e metropolitan agencies. METROPOLITAN SYSTEM GLTDELLNES The Council is committed to pro'iding regional services and facilities within the urban service area. However, the Council will not support development of facilities substantially in e.xccss of forecasted need. The challenge to the Council and commissions is to find the middle ground between overbutkling and undersizing essential facilities. Some facilities that deliver services to the urban semee area will have to be phv'sicaily located within the rural service area even though they pnmarily serve people living in the urban service area. This may result from land requirements, the location of natural resources or the need for interregionaJ connections. For example, solid waste landfills with requirements for large acreages win likely be located in the rural service area: sand and gravel e.xtraction and regional parks depend on the location of the resource and often occur in the rural service ares, and highways, power lines and pipelines that tie this region to other parts of the state and nation will have to traverse the rural service area. When urban facilities must be located in the rural area, they will be located, developed and operated in a manner that minimizes interference with agriculture and the rural settlement pattern. Sewers Only land within the urban service area will receive regional sewer service. Service vsail be provided in accordance with regkanal and local staging of development as outlined in the Council's sewer policy plan and local comprehensive plans that are in conformity with the Council's regional plan. The Council will take the necessary actions to provide metropolitan sewer interceptors and wastewater treatment plants adequate to transport sewage generate by users in the urban service area and to treat it to the extent necessary to meet the requirements of the national pollution disefaarge elimioatioo system permit for each treatment plant Central sewer service currently fnovided in rural centers can continue at levels insistent with each center’s ability to Cnance and operate systems locally. In rural centers or any other part of the rural area receiving regional sewer service, the Council will determine regional service allocations for sewer flow using the same procedures that are used for other communities located within the metropolitan urban service area. 10 V y- ir =-'V*. • v ‘' i-; i-V :. i- >• vy ' ■ -*•*. ' ”:'v Kf i J’ ,-# m ^^4 |li^s.- The Council will assure the conunuation of servnee adequate to meet the needs of dcve!opme:r. receiving regional sew'er sersTce. In order to meet this commitment, the Counc.i emphasizes the need to monitor the condition of older sewers and sewers with a history of problems, as well as the trends in sewage volume as opposed to design capacits'. The Council will also work for increased coordination between the sewer and the solid waste system in the area of planning and project development of compjosting and co-composting. Recycling residuals from the waste treatment process wath municipal solid waste may help resolve disposal problems confronting both the sewer and ihe solid waste systems. Jhe Council will establish standards fer on-site sewage disposal systems in the rural are3_t_oI nc V^tglyUJll * WII -------............................................................ ■ —----- protect the refion’s groundwater and the health of rural area residents, and to preyent the.nced for nremature extensions of the regional sewer system. All elements of the Minnesota Pollunon Agency standards for on-site sewaee disposal ssstems should be followed i_n all areas Alj communities shall require at least two sewage -disposal drainfields to_be located on each building site, a nrimarv drainOcId and a replacement should the onginal system fail. Except in the commercial agricultural area, all facets of the Council’s standards for the gropej desig n, location. ipstallation. maintenance and on-going monitonng of on-site ssstems should also adopted.., The Council will require all communities to certify that they have met these standa idsimoLio approval of local comprehensive plan amendments or makine favorable recom_mendations in The Council will review its existing policies concerning community on-site sewage disposal systems package treatment plants in the rural area in light of the Council's pojjcv to encoura.ge clusteriny in the rural area and the improved technology which is or mav become.avaiia hle i,n_ th^ future. The Council will also consider whether monitoring of rural water supplies mav be detect pollution from on-site sewaee disposal systems. ssarv to Planning for the metropolitan sewer system should address the impacts on the system fro.m development outside the urban service area: specifically, impacts on the service availabil ity chacge fSAd. «n<^ ^he underuse of metropolitan sewer facilities. Planning for the metropolitan sewer system should also consider hqw local cornprehensive s^wer plana should address the ruraUto.urban transition areas, and protect them from mcompau^e " ~---^nt that may later block the efficient extension of the sewer systen L Traasportatioa Metropolitan highway improvements will be planned and developed to serve the needs of residents in the urban service area, including the freestanding growth centers. Highways will be provided in accordance with the Council ’s regional transportation policy plan and local comprehensive plans that ar.* in conformity with the Council ’s regional plan. Varying levels of highway service will continue to exist in the urban service area due to travel behavior, development patterns and the nature of highways facilities, but efforts will he made to provide a reasonable level of metropolitan hig ’nway service throughout the urban service area. I mfe-.s-v '-. ]5 .■:‘iW\‘- |y;K .,v 4,f ■r ■ •• ■’ 'i \ > ; ■■ ■ -iS •4y-;^ ■ f¥;: li.:-? 'viv IISi - '2? >*• VH- ^*V:r. .;.. 'XiiV J'r a'r. The Council influences metropoiiian high^vay development in a variety of was?. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn;DOT) constructs and maintains most of the roads in the metropolitan system, and the ultimate authority for highway programming dec:sions rests with the state commissioner of transportation. However. MjvDOT seriously considers the Council’s highway policymaking and project planning in virtu-a’ly ail mefopoiitan area highway priorities. The Council approves construction on controlled-access highways and develops guidelines for setting highway prionties as well as guidelines for approval of interchange improvements. The Council is also responsible for endorsing Federal Aid Urban and Interstate Substitution funding priorities, which are set by local elected officials acting through the Council’s Transportation Advisory Board. Highway planning is very important because the ability of people to take advantage of the opportunities the area offers and acquiring essential goods and services depend on having a good highvmy system and on keeping it operating weU. This means roads on the existing system must be able to provide the type and level of service designated in the Council’s transportation policy plan. Traffic management strategies or new construction will be necessary when traffic solumes approach design capacities, when road conditions p(»e hazards and slowdowns, and when new developments arc proposed that differ substantially from assumptions made in the regional transportation plan. Implementing traffic management strategies for metropolitan highways is a state or regional responsibility that frequently has direct or indirect implications for local sv-stems Local governments will have primary responsibility for carrying out traffic management strategics on local systems. New sources may share the responsibility for funding new construction with the traditional county, state and federal sources. New sources may include the region, local governments and the private sector. With the potential for funding and operational limitations, denying access to the regional system may also be necessary for unantkripat^ new developments. Highway planning should also address air pollution caused by heavy concentrations of auto, and bus traffic. Although this problem has traditionally been associated with the two metro centeis, it is a growing problem in the regional business concentrations where highways are reaching capacity. The relatkmship between metropolitan highways and outstatc Minnesota is another consideration in highwqr plaiming. The Council recognizes the importance of outstatc connections, particularly fi>r economic development.] nnactiona aa it will t» tha mtropoliton highway synawii ilitan highwava in the rural area will be planned to support a level of development coBSiitent with the Oouncirs rural density policies. The Council will not plan for a level of ^tvice that would support or encourace development greater than the policy except where an eateption has been approved according to the guidelines of the Metropolitan Development and InveatmentFi.! f». t f I • i4’ f planning must also consider the rural-to-urban transition areas, and how rights-of-wav for the svitcm of orindpai and minor arterials that will be needed in the future should be protected from incompatible develoomenL 12 4’ ‘tv- i.v .♦ •' I-S.K- :-f '..f-v, :irj»-' ■V. 5» '|: M?yjW • Vt :'f. 3 ' ft. 0^H m^y- ?S^'' ."“ Buses operating on ‘treeis and highways will probably dominate public transit sersice through the remainder of the ccntuiy. This docs not preclude the introduction of seme tlxed guides a, ^ facilities in heavily traveled corndors. but costs and time constraints work against a massive shilt in form over the next 15 ^ars. Nevertheless, the Council will continue to seek creative, forward- lorrfcing solutions to tnnsit service problems. Locations with large nu.nbcrs of households andor high employment in relatively small areas offer food potential for aublic trariSit service. It is also important to provade transit to the people who ha^no other way to travel. This generally means elderly, handicapped, low-income and young people. Providing icrvice to these people will probably involve above average subsidies. Some parts erf the urban service area with low-density development may be served only by paratransit on a demand basu This is also true for some of the transit-dependent people who Iwe in low-dcnsity areas or cannot use the public system Regularly scheduled regional trar^ii service will oot be provided to the rural service area, but residents of the area can arrange for and finance public transit or public paratransit on their own if they so desire. This does not preciu c the Coundl or the Regional Transit Board from becoming involved in planning for the special mobility needs of elderly and handicapped people in the rural service area or tor the use of public- funds specially appropriated for this purpose. Transit planning will take into account the cost ot provium i: udr.su^i and how that mav change over time as transit-dependent populations increase in these areas. Planning for hiybwavs and transit should consider the relationships among tiansportation ne^ population densities and the provision of human services jntpluding public schools^ health ajid p»ivices. employment opportunities and emergency sendees, Parks The regional parks and open space system includes facilities in both the urban and rural service areas. Regtonal recreation open space will be acquired to serve the needs ot today s urban populatioii and to preserve outs'anding natural and recreation resources for the area s future population. Facilities will be developed according to priorities in the Council s regional [ ark plan, which wiD emphasize the needs of residents in the urban service area. The devefooment of regional nark facilities that attpic^ larye numben of users wjU gpnerally occur in the urban aetvice area, unless the demands cannot be adequately met. If \\ ff qpc^ary^ develon such facilitka in the rural service area, adequate support sppdce^.such as roads,and sewers must be provided^ Airports Every effort will be made to get the maximum use out of the existing airport s^tem, consistent with the CouncU*s airport policy plan. This is especially important for the "major and -intermediate- airports, all of which are located in the urban service area. Th«e facilitiw should continue to operate and to operate safely even if it requires substantial upgrading of existing facilities and modifications or controls on nearby land uses and development proposals. Und us V. tjf "in- .•+^V ^ri.- : ^.■' ff w;; t/H;*^ir! ^h-'. ^5-^' fc iaJ- ^.i- ^‘‘ "i; m my. ^* •:... /'■■■; “f I"!'■fe'>'^' compatibility is critical to ensure future as well as current adequate operations at the regional aiqxarts. If a new "minor" airport site is needed, lands in the commercial agricultural area as defined in this document should be avoided. In addition, the only facilities developed on or adjacent to the airport should be ttose directly invoKed v^ith making it useable and safe. Other Area Systems 'Xhis framework focuses on the four metropolitan systems of sewers, transportation, regional pa» ks and airports because the Council has special obligations and responsibilities for them under the '' tropoUtan Land Planning Act Under the Waste Management Act, the Council’s solid waste program has the same status in many respects as the four metropolitan systems and will receive the same level of protection as those systems. However. The Council also has planning responsibilities for several other systems that serve the residents of the .Metropolitan Area. Currently, the Council has adopt^ plans dealing with housing, health, surface water management, juvenile justice and water resources, as well as major position papers on the aging, arts and development disabilities. All of these planning documents and the programs associated with them contrftmte to metropolitan resource management. The Council must direct attention to the impact of this framework and metropolitan system plans on these other area plans and programs, as well as the extent to which the other pianr and programs modify the development and investment frunewOTk and metropolitan system plans. The Council also recognizes that numerous interrelariooships exist among the other area system plans and the metropolitan system plans. Examples include aging and health, transportation and housing, and sewers, solid waste and water resources. For some of the other systems, the relationships arc less obvious. However, all of the sj'stems, whether designated as metropolitan or not, have the following in common: a) assumptions about future directions of area-wide growth and change and reliance on a uniform set of forecasts; b) accountability to Council legislative mandates; c) concern with orderly and economic development; d) adherence to the same process of regional planning and decision-making; and e) reliance on the area’s population for most of their flnancid support. lli-r. '¥' 7 L; ,.v u ■> ’rf !rii; p. ‘f:7 ■ r; 'ft ; t... T PART THREE MDIF, Appendices Appendix: Criteria for Council Approval of Local Plans that are Inconsjst,^ with MDIF Rural Area Policies Some communities in the rural area have existing development patterns t_hat are inconsistent.vMLb Council policy. Specifically, some communities have tilreadv developed at -residemial densities greater than one unit per 10 acres. This appendix provides criteria and grocedures for re%iew and approval of local comprehensive plans that ire inconsistent wjth the density ix)licy. Exceptions to the policies for the rural area v».-il! be considered only for communities that cannot meet the policy because of the existing subdivisions erjand de>elopment. The Council mav approve an exception as part of its review of a local comprehensive plan. The extent of .tjie exception will be based upon how well the community will or has: protected good agricultural land; protected wetlands and other envTronmentallv sensitive areas; implemented performance standards for on-site sewnge disposal systems th;^t nre consistcrit with the Coundrs Waste\^'nter Treatment and Handling Policy Plan\ and with all Metropolitan Development Guideadopted a comprehensive plan consistent chapters, especially those for the metrot>olitan systems (sewers, transportation, avtatijm ^nd parks.^ In order for the Council to support an exception to the rural density policy, the community m_u.Lt ide the following as a part of its comprehensive plan amendment: 2. 1 The total land area facreige) of the community, adjusted For surface water and maigr hiyhwav rii^hts-ot-wav. The number of existing lots of record. The amount an<| fncatinn of land owned bv public agencies or occupied bv institutionjii uses and rcftricted from development. The amount and location of undeveloped land, with an ansivsis of its development 2. & 1 8a 2a IQ. iia potential based on current and proposed planning and zoning. The amount and location of land planned and zoned for uses other than agriculture and residenti)||| ^^v<[>|9pment. with a description of uses that will be permitted uses, and anv areas that will be certifiedThe amount and location of aericultural land eligible for the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves prograrm The amount and location of wetlands, with information demonstrating how such areas .Mnll be protected from developmcnL Conies of all local ordinances relating to adoption of performance standards for on-si^ sewage disposal systems. j r • The location of anv proposed rural-to-urban transition areas, alon.^ with plans and poliges ^o protect such areas from prematufc or incompatible developmcnL Additional information ffay be ne.x$sarv to brine the local comprehensive plan t.nto compliance with metropolitan systems plans. Schedule for implementing the plan amendment, rr &, Vv I fr iir :•' •■ •: t *. ‘ ^ . \»», ■yz-i Kmb'.v!;' i'< ^-'r.: i'"'. fe '• ■''. i .mm V. ^Is#' orsrvfv. Appendix; Land Uses in the Rural Are.i This appendix helps clanfv what land uses mav be supported bv Counc.l p<,Mu-% for the rural service area, and provides guidance for both the Council jnd kxal gQ%ernrr.f nts It B important to retnernber that even though a particular land use rr.av be acceptable in the rur.il area from i regional peraDCCtive, the Council will not recommend that every community provide for every possibte land use in its rural area if it would not be consistent \»ith local plans. AJl uses wouM abo be subject to anv local, regional or state permitting cr licensing rcouirrmentit. Land Use Recommendations for tiw Rural Area 1 Mky Arm 1 . n ll ,..,r 1 1 r iiV-11 » ^ Exanpluu at Consistent Laud Uses | ConuB«rdal AgriailtHnl lUfioa Acricnitural: broad range of agncultural land uses, including *^one txMrdmg and tnuuflg. kennets, sod farnis, irec f3rms, production and prixcssmg, storage areas or 1 buildings; for pnmary protection areas, uses consistent vmh 1980 Agncultural Preserves Act Reskleatial: single family residences at a maximum densirs' of 1/40 acres, accessory j apanmenu f Coamercial/lBdttstrial: small on-^arm operations ncrroally associated vsitn farming lustitutiouak uroan generated Caoliiies, sucb as waste disposal faalities; prohibited from ' primary protection areas unless no other location available; prohibited from secondary protection area unless no site in general rural use area available 1 CmmcxiI Rural Um Agricuiturai: ail uses listed for commercial agncultural policy area1 RasMcattal: stngto family residences at a maxunum density of I/IO acres computed on the basis of 640 acre parcels (one square mile), twin homes^Uuplexes (meeting density standard), accessory apartments, group-living homes wnh shared cooking faalities CoaaMrdai/RacreatioMl and Urbaa-Oaaarated Uacsi ui ban-generated uses, including recreational vehicle parks, racetracks, festival sites, campgrounds, gun clubs, pir-ate airports, solid waste fiKilUies, auto salvage and recycling, other similar Csalities, netfbborbood ooovenience/heivice/retail uses, sucb as Qnancial offices, video stores. 1 jawilinr, groceries, daycare centers, oonuneroai/service/retatl uses adjacent to or served by exating metro highways, agnculturat producu processing, home occupations, bed and breahtet lodging Ihcilitiea. dentist and doaor offices, landing areas for uiualight and modr. b^rpianes, retreat bdlities, golf courses IndwtrliJ: sand and gravel ohning, urban-generated uses that require a spacious, isolated locatioa, small manuflseturing firms origioating from home occupations, oil or gasolbie storage tank &nm, refineries, solid waste transfer/processiog Polities laatitwtiewal: urhao-generated uses, such as waste-dispasal instaJlatioos, Jails, prisons, public airports, human service agency satellite offices, parks, trails, open space, other similar Caaluies, unique natural or conservation areas, schools, churches, cemeteries 1/ .i iifivft?# '•< . ■ #r^’ R;< r-V'j Metropolitan Council General Rural Use Area Planning Forum February 27, 1992 AGENDA 9:00 am Introduction Anne Hurlburt Manager, Division of Comprehensive Planning and Local Assistance 9:05 am Policy Overview Carl Ohm Principal Planner, Metro Systems Dept 1:30 am Implementation Bob Overby Planner, Division of Comprehensive Planning and Local Assistance 10:00 ai Questions, Answers, Anne, Carl and Bob ^neral Discussion 11:00 am Meeting Evaluation Please fill out form on other side of the agenda. Adjournment >•#i AA / METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Mnin Piiri Cffiirr 2J0 Em'- Sirrrt 5/ ‘^12 2*^1 ^ ' 2^^ rn /^u #• c' ^ [-i- i' ■1 ' w. . - *■* '. . • . >^ v ■■P- ■ ■ :T', ^U-m!'vr^ M ■yfe F«bru«fy 10. 1992 ,FE3 1 2 i::2 REi N#w Rur*l Af#* PoiicI®* •nd Invitation to a Planning Forum p^Hf tocal Govamment Official or Staffperson: On Dacanibtr 5. 1991 . tha Matropolitan Council amended the Metropolitan OevglPP^^^I Inti—tiTMni Framawwyk (MOIF) to include new policies for the general rural use area rf the region. S^Mmrfna?^~araa of tha region Is located outside the metropolitan urbar. service area (MUai^ and la not dasignatod tor commercial agriculture. A copy of the new policies is enclosed with this latter. The new pofidaa continue to uphold the Council’s basic rural density standard of no more man one ctwelting unit par 10 acres. However, the land area for calculating density has changed from 40 acres (maximum of tour units) to up to 640 acres (a maximum of 64 units). The new p^cles do not apactty a mininHjm lot size. Instead, minimum lot size should be determined by oanoir.tanca stwtdards. Many of the other policy changes (such as allowing clustered davelopmant) are designed to provide rrwre options for local governments to tailor the regional polcy to W unique conditions in their corrvnunitie^ J iu \ S9 u I Tha Council wUI hold a PLANNINQ FORUM on THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 27. from 9 to 11 a.m. in tha Cour^cil Chambers (first floor, Mears Park Centre Building). \ :r The orooram will Include the following items: a summary description of the new policies an axDlanation of how tha rural area poUctas are related to policies in the Counal’s metropolitan •ystama plana, an explanation of how tha new policies may result in amendments to local comprahanaiva plans, and plenty of time for questions and answers on each topic, Tha Council will hold a second planning forum on rural area policy sometime in May. That forum u. AvAtnnidMR nf fftirai dfivdincimdnt ootions (such as dustohng) undar tho I W ----------r---------------- ' new policy. A notica on this torum win be sent to you at a later date I encourage you to attend both of planning forums. Sincerely, Mifv E. MctefsonMary E Chair MEAA Endosura 1 i fem p' ■ I? *lv c" •V K- ,/v V?., rV ■-•1-^r;': i-"'' 'if Vi' * . ;■ 'C ■ .-(i f/ V i :# VS r# pi;: fpv y-. ■ '•«. V ':■ :^V •: ' - ’ y.;it , 'if. •l. si K^f- ' ■ii’: , ? -■■ V t-'' ®v • -•! k f.**^ I' 0 c 1 s ooo I ooo tVCM »mo !■< ni X ODD even >oo J}m t/» OB > H os 6 > T) O) Z Zm COo o T1 o 3Do 1.11 -1^- 'I :i: , r.f nU'Ipf 'S'S ii.^ :Mt -: mm -i. I4. ‘ ‘.'r. (; 0 > I > C T'm m -1 W> <%r 0 > ^ A i ^ s V 7 n Vi ? C. O 1 J^ I ' i.O 5?o V I ? a ' I «i 1 *> j j. •>, r' ' ^^5 'b I ?I ^ *I r c' - 5. ‘ • r> ^ l^^« i ?S i' W ffi ii ¥ <N V\a > c^ ‘ V N % rsi ,u» r » t' \y S « 3 >^3•• I . 2 5 ^ »t M N ~t < >2/ X gr* \M f «» •V v^ « t 4 it c> 5 c j uS •«» a ? :■ I I . I \u iu, ;t*» M #~ i^ ^»o *w» b - O y'lf K,y' jf V V wi k* 1,'' >A ,A' I* * ► I K - ' 0 v>»cu b» I i 1 i 1 1 !1 1•I 1 1 1 .1 1 K) ~T W ,C' ^ « ^ £ o <■“ r* |0 :*1 ^ f > ? ? X ,it I I o ^ O r^ ' ' ’ ' • ■' p n -4: W |N) •■ C^J :vo ;ia) 10 !o < ! IW : 0 « % ‘l*» o IP y\ y ^ [j \/\ o 1/1 ;o ^ ? ? ? - J 'x ^ ? < IV ;< ^ •«o N ,c® iu> ^ JJ I *4 fi i P 0 0 0 r I : ' ! i W - ^ 2 Z$ t>*0 1 i I c> 5> 9" tU lA> QQ <?wS!S^ 1 2 « I I JJ^Sr! i : r- b» ^ •~J ~c, |lvC O <X> -sC I'^k •%CO ^ v\ ^ -J *_ • «■ • m 0 C* i/\ O 0» w ^is, * -sj to sina*'! yj cb u) m f i ip ^'<A 5 y' ‘s ^ o ;r* ^ ^ 4 i^ T» -:^ 0# IUl ^ ^ vi ^ • • • • . ^r- r~ N w N ■s. Gti U>#U) N ?o tA W lAc !A j I^5:! i \A w ^ UJr» U w U- N u*%• 4L 'w I'N%r -j Vi vC® »1 tsj V/» N •J nI t» S •»*' t: 4 WZ-jV-.W,. ■ . ■'. Vw-f;';T- , IK r» P «i f { i (* ? (0 l> C I S’ 5: (T Wi v^ 'i a I .-■^ A-.ar<iitv Jliaj! cnUJ 2 <zS 3z / w~ i . «:' L U ~ -1 >* ~r/, c r 7 j? s-S -5 nilmi