Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
06-08-1992 Council Packet
»• MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD JUNE 8, t992 ROLL Tn« Council m«t on th« abov« data with tha following mambars prasant: Mayor Barbara Patarson, CouncIImambars Gabrial Jabbour, J. Olann Qoattan, Mary Butiar and Edward Callahan. Tha following rapraaantad tha City staff: City AdmlnIstrator Ron Moorsa, Public Kforks OIractor John Garhardson, Building a Zoning AdmlnIstrator Jaanna Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning AdmlnIstrator MIchaal Oaffron, Pol lea Chlaf Staphan Sullivan, City Attornay Kavin Staunton, City Enginaar QIann Cook and City Racordar Tar I Naab. Mayor Patarson cal lad tha maating to ordar at 7:00 P.M. (•1) CONSENT AGENDA Qoattan ramovad I tarn S2. Butiar addad I tarns #5, 0, 7, and 9. Mayor Patarson ramovad I tarn §22. It was movad by Jabbour, sacondad by Butiar, to approva tha Consant Aganda as amandad. Ayas 5, nays 0. Motions for all itarns adoptad by consant aganda will ba includad in tha minutas in thair raspactiva numariwi,! ordar. (•2) APPROVAL OF MINUTES Butiar statad that Man Is soallad wrong on ®aga 10. Qoattan askaS that tha tima of adjowrnaiant of tha Exacutiva Sasaion ba addad to tha minutas. jt was iiovad by Butiar, sacondad by Qoattan, to approva tha minutas of tha ragular abating of tha Orono Council hold on May ii, I9B2 as amandad. Ayas 9, nays 0. (a§2) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It waa swvad by Jabbour, sacondad by Butiar, to approva tha minu sa of tha continuad Public Maaring for tha SttMibs Bay Sawar Asaasamant Haaring haid on May 18, 1992. Ayas 9, nays 0. (88) BtBTf RILLIAM MILLER. 2BBI CABOO POINT ROAD - VARIANCE VI I I lam Ml I tar wa» t«snt. ¥ i; ■ i; I.' ■ ■■ ^ •c'.. r- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 8. 1992 ZONING FILE 81679 ~ CONT. Moors# #xpl#ln#d that this Is a r#qu#st for a hardcover varianc# to const root a 22*x2«’ d#tach#d garag#. replacing an existing garaoa. and for an aftar-tha-fact variance for structural improvements to a gazebo/bathhouse located within the 0-75 setback area Qoetten noted that even after the Stop Work Order, construction continued on the gazebo. She was concerned about precedent setting with this Issue and reminded the Council of others with similar applications that had been denied. Miller stated that he had applied for a permit for the garage and during the procesa the Inspector noted the work being done to the gazebo. Me said he was unaware of Orono’f restrictions on hardcover. Me added that after the Inspector had asked him to stop work on the structure, very high winds threatened to knock down the structure so some of the siding was added to the structure to prevent this. He said he did not continue work on the decking or StaIrway. Qoetten asked Miller If he called the Inspector to notify him of this need to continue work. Miller said he had not called the City office. Qoetten said aha was glad that the Council application back to the Planning CommI sal on figures had changed since that review. had refarred the as the hardcover Miller explained that he was originally using which was detarmined to be incorrect. a aurvef from I986t Qoetten pointed out that Is the reason for asking for a comprehensive review of the entire property.mmmsMstaff If the applicant would be paying the appropriate after-the fact fees. Mabusth concurred that the additional fees would be charged for the gazebo portion of th« project. I i -I .-'W'^fv *1 'r-' A. ■.-..■A. . ■ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 8, 1992 ZONING FILE 81879 - CONT. It was fflovad by But Iar, t8Condad by Mayor P«t«rson» to approva tha y^irianca raouast for Application 81679 for Wiliiatn Millar of 2691 Casco Point Road, and diractad staff to draft tha appropriata ratolution. Ayas 5. nays 0. (88S) 81724 TAMHY L. W000I8, 2818 CASCO POINT ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE - RESOLUTION 83129 It was movad by Jabbour. aacondad by But Iar, to adopt Ratolution 83128 for App 11 cat ion 81724 for Tammy L. Woodis of 2819 Casco Point Road, approving a conditionai usa parmit and varianca for tha construction of a pooi on a through lot. Ayas S. nays 0. (888) 81729 CLAIR ROOD, 3230 NAVARRE LANE - SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT - RESOLUTION 83128 It was movad by Jabbour, sacondad by But Iar. to adopt Ratolution 83128 for Application 81729 for Clair Rood, 3280 Navarra Lana, for a subdivision of a iot lina raarrangamant. Ayas 5. nays 0. (887) 81731 CLAIR ROOD, 221S RENNOOO WAY - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION 83130 It was aiovad by Jabbour, sacondad by But Iar, to adopt Ratolution 83130 for Appllcatiof) 81731, Clair Rood of 2215 Kanwood Way, approving a varianca to construct fancing. Ayas 9, nays 0. (88) 81734 JOHN BURGER, 3780 BAY8I0E ROAD • PRELIMINARY 8U801V18I0N • RESOLUTION 83131 John Su t. Noorsa SRpiainad that this is a two lot subdivision application. Out lot A wi11 ba spacialiy comblnad with Lot 1 for araa cradit. Tha Planning Commission unanimously racoamandad approval of tha app11 cat Ion. Qoattan askad If both lots hava adaquata saptic sltas. Mabusth confirmad that thay do and addad that Lot 2 Is Includad In tha Stubbs Bay Sawar Projact araa. .1 4- ••V' 0 -1 iiii H' H HINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL HEETINQ HELD JUNE 8, 1992 ZONING FILE §1734 - CONT. It WAS movtd by Butl«r, sACondAd by Mayor PAtArson, to adopt Rasolution A3131 for Application #1734 for John Burgar of 3750 BayaidA Road, for praliminary subdivision approval. Ayas 5, nays 0. Butlar notad that In tha lattar from SP-Tastlng, Inc., a marcury float is racomsandad. Sha askad about tha safaty factor of such a davica. Qaffron atatad that thay hava not had any probiams with this davica and it la vary similar to what is usad in a furnaca tharmostat. (ait) 91738 QNEQOflY C. PETERSON, 1920 SHORELINE DRIVE - RENEWAL VARIANCE * RESOLUTION 93132 It waa movad by Jabbour, sacondad by Butlar, to adopt Rasolution 93132 for Application #1736, Qragory C. Patarson of 1920 Shoralina Oriva, approving a ranawal varlanca for tha construction of a naw rasidanca. Ayas 5, nays 0. NAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Hayor Patarann announcad to tha rasidants In attandanca that thara would not ba public discussion regarding tha Stubbs Bay Sawar Project, and this item would only ba discussed during Executive Saaaion. A) Butlar read aloud an advertlaaaiant from tha wayxata Weakly Newspaper which advertised mala and female dancers on the Niee Deduction charter boat. Sha suggasted they bring th^s to the attention of the LMCD. B) Butler referred to e latter sent to the Council Members from Mr. Fick in which he expressed his concern that the City had not completed Its ehoreland regulations. She said she called him to report that Orono Is one of two cities who hea submitted their new regulations. She noted the response ehe received from him wee very patroniiing. t Si ii II ’ ****^^‘' : ^ *9 h-: ■It-' •Ti MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 8, 1992 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. C) Jabbour raportad that ha, Mayor Pataraon, Callahan and JoEltan Hurr mat with tha ONR to discuss potantial public accass si tat. Ha said thay mantionad to tha ONR that Orono’s ralationship with tham goat bayond ona public accass. Ha said that Orono and Minnatrista wara tha first citias to adopt watland philosophias. Ha told tha ONR that tha City looks forward to tha ONR’s input on tha ramifIcatIons of improving tha axisting Highway 12 corridor through Orono, spacificalIy, tha impact of tha southarn aiignmant on tha Luca Lina Trail. 0) Jabbour raportad that tha sub-commi ttaa to tha LMCO's Task Forca will maat on Juna 10th and ha will ba in attandanca. E) Jabbour announcad that last waak an Issua was Drought up ragarding his participation in marina issuas. Ha said ha is a marina ownar, and would tharafora stap as I da during discussions of marinas. Ha statad that his concajns about marinas would not subside. Ha noted that tha City Attorney had opined that Jabbour does not have a conflict of interest In this area. Butler said she would hate to sea him withdraw from discussion on this issua. Callahan fait that It was sssantlal that ha continue on tha Lake Use Coaimittss, and stated that if Jabbour is satisfied with the solution that would ba fine with him. F) Callahan rafsrrsd to a latter from the LMCO which alludes to a Joint effort of the LMCO and the ONR to submit a grant application for land acQuisition. He thought there wee a Committee established to determine tha bast site and asked why the grant application at this tiaie. Jabbour reported that the study by the Committee did not move in an appropriate manner which was time-wise appropriate for tho grant application. He understood that the LCMR was lees likely to consider award of grant money without a specific or approximate site. Moorse explained that the grant application includes only one specific site, and the remainder of the money is to be used In general for sites on Lake Minnetonka. a i me - - - - -^- - - - -K lk..- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - w 4 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 8, 1992 (•10) BIO AWARD LIFT STATION 99 RENOVATION Moorts •xpliin^o th*t this is s bid swsrd for Lift Ststion S9. Butlsr atksd Mhsrs this Lift Ststion Is iocstsd. Qsrhsrdson rsportsd that Lift Station is tocatsd on Bohns Point. Butlsr asksd how old ths currant Lift Station is. Qarhardson said It was pi scad in sarvica somawhara batwaan 1965 and 1970. It was movad by Goattan, sacondad by But Iar, to award tha bid for Lift Ststion «9 rastoration to NawMach Compan'ts, Inc. for an amount of $46,800.00. Ayas 5, nays 0. (•in BIO AWARD 1992 BEAL COAT PROJECT Mayor Patarson a^kad if this itam falls within a budoatad amount. Garhardson said it doas. Butlsr askad what portion of straats would ba inetudad in tha projact. Qarhardson raportad that tha straats that wars pavad in 1991 would ba saai coatad this ynar. It was movad by Butlsr, sacondad by Mayor Patarson, to award tha bid for tha 1992 Baal Coat Projact to Omann Brothars for an amount of $9,174.40. Ayas 5, nays 0. (912) AWARD OF BIOB FOR STUBBS BAY SEWER PROJECT Noorsa axplainad this is an award of bids for Stubbs Bay Bawar Projact. Ha notad tha final data for appaals is Juna iSth, and thay hava a sood Idaa at prasant of how many appaals thay can axpact. Ha suftastad awarding tha Olds that avaninf in ordar to procaad with tha projact. Jabbour askad If it would still ba posslbla to tha projact if tha bid is awardad. ramova an araa from Noorsa indicatad that would ba part of an •$raamant that was discuasad with tha contractor. Ha notad that as part of this approval, tha ant Ira contract would ba approvad with tha condition that tha City has tha option of dal sting any portion of tha projact outside tha bass araa within a certain time period. 8 ■tv / -■n •Vi'f.iiiifiA Y ■ imlitf h’. It ^ L-; r-v*-E' MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 8, 1992 ife- ritrt - AWARD OF BIOS FOR STUBBS BAY SEWER PROJECT - CONT. Staunton askad »f thara wara provisions in tha bid to do the altarnativa portions saparataly. Cook statad that Mas not includad in tha bid. Butlar askad If staff fait confidant that language could be incorporated Mith the bid aMard that Mould assure tha City tha right to delate a portion of tha bid at a future data. She thought they should ms it tha 30 days. Goattan askad Mhat is tha axpactad completion data. Cook reported that they Mould not be able to start for about l 1/2 Masks and completion is axpactad approximately November 1st. Staunton statad they Mould need to draft language for the agreement on Mhich both parties Mould agree. Ha did not feel that Mould be a problem. It Mas moved by Jabbour, seconded by Callahan, to SMard tha bids for tha Stubbs Bay ssMar project reserving tha right to delate any portion of tha project at tha original bid amount for a period of 30 days from tha data of expiration of tha appeal period, subject to tha agraamant addressing all of Council’s concerns. Jabbour MithdrsM his motion. It Mas laovad by Callahan, seconded by Goattan, to amard tha bid for tha Stubbs Bay asMar project reserving tha right to delate any portion of tha project at tha original bid amount for a period of 30 days from tha data of expiration of tha appeal period, subject to tha agraamant addressing all of Council’s concerns. In tha foilOMing amounta: Base Area Alternate Bite 1 Alternate Site 2 Alternate Site 3 Attarnata Sita S $802,913.00 182,192.20 30,621.25 381.671.75 112.973.75 Total Contract Amount $1,460,331.95 Ayes 9, nays 0. Y : -.i; fi ^ V m r- "vi ;v t/;;: ■,1-r ■ K-'i' MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 8, 1992 (•13) PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF LEAF STREET - ftESOLUTION 93133 Moors# sxpisinsd tr.ii Is s rsgusst for author I zst Ion from Council to movs ahssd in tha prsparation of r.lans spacifications ^or raconstruction of Laaf Straat. tha and Cook axplalnad that tha portion of Laa^ Straat raconstruction will ba ramovad from tha sawar bid and constructad with MSA funds. Ha notad thay ara looking at a coup I a of options, an urban/rurai saction or a total rural sactlon. Tha straat would ba aporoximataly 32* whan fini shad. Butiar asKad how wida tha road is cur^'antiy. Cook said it is 21-22*, with tha shouidar araas In liau of curb and guttar. Ha notad tha shouldar-to-shouldar width of tha road is 26*. Ha addad tha raconstructIon would Involva Laaf Straat from County Road 64 to Watartown Road. P^itlar raportad that MSA funds can only ba usad If connacts to anothar MSA straat or Stata Highway. tha road Cook notad that tha sawar construction will impact tha vagatation in tha araa mora than tha straat raconstruction. Jabbour askad tha width of tha axisting right-of-way. Cook said tha right-of-way is 66* wida. Jabbour 8tatad that no ona wants to ancouraga tha widaning of a roadway. Ha askad Cook what tha raaidanta in tha araa would bo saving by using MSA funds. Cook axplalnad thara Is an approxImata $100,00 diffaranca. Ha notad tha road constructad to MSA standards would cost mora bacauaa of tha additional amanitlas. Ha Indicatad that tha City cwld aoply for a varlanca to tha road standards that would aiiMi construction at a 26* width. But Iar fait thay should apply for tha varlanca. Sha askad If thay would ba abia to box tha sawar construction to stay within tha right-of-way. Cook notad thay would ba using this mathod as oftan as poaalbla. Goat tan said sha assumad this pro j act would ja dona in a timaly ■I \;1 4 M ti .u 5^' ( f .. -• fe 61 i k - ‘ "*’v iSp p: MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 8, 1992 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS - LEAF STREET - CONT. Cook notod this projtct would b« coordlnttod with th« towor project. H« folt that tha widar road would not Incraaaa tha apaad I aval a on tha roadwayi but would only maka tha road safar. It wai movad by Callahan, aacondad by Butlar, to diract tha City Enginaar to prapara plana and apac 1 f IcatIona tor tha raconatructIon of Laat Straat, and to conaidar tha varianca raquaat to allow the •treat to ba conatructad at a 28* width. Cola Graham, 95 Leaf Straat, aakad If tha raaidanta of tha area would ba notified of tha public hearing regarding thia iaaua. Mayor Pataraon aaid they would ba notified at tha appropriate time. Jabbour aakad tha raaidanta If they would prefer to pay for tha road raconatructI on thamaalvaa. Jana Bahrman, 340 Leaf Straat, aald aha had a petition to hand In with 100S oppoaition of tha raconatructIon project to widen tha road. She atatad that aha did not wiah tha City to apply for tha MSA funda. She aald aha waa told by tha City Adminiatrator that State funda could not ba uaad for tha aawar project. Mayor Pataraon aaid tha Council undaratanda thIa poaltion, but they muat review ail opt Iona. Bob Minkama, 3200 Bayaida Road, atatad that they have already bean Inforiaad of what thair aaaaaamant will ba for tha aawar Ha did not aaa any benefit to ueing MSA funda which would widen tha roadway and In affect create a high apeed roadway. Me aald he did not want the road to become a ahort-cut and waa concerned for the aafety of tha children in the area. Qoetten aald aha thought the raaidanta were concerned about having the loweet aaeeaeiaent poaelble for the eewer project. She aald the Council haa tried to find all poaaible waye to reduce this amount. Bahrman atatad they do not want the aaeeaament lowered at the expenee of the beauty of the street. Graham asked when they could expect the results of the plans and sped f Icat Ions. Cook said It would take about one month to prepare. * A.- 4i if' Fv ■ •V r> •;j i"' MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 8. 1992 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS - LEAF STREET - CONT. Gtrhardton not«d th«y do not hav« to havo a public haaring for tha projact, and tuggastad a public maating instaad. Ha indicatad that tha road could ba atakad to allow tha rasidants to visualIza tha affact on thair propartias. Jabbour raquast. ihat tha City’s chancts wars for tha varlanca Cook fait that thay had a 90* chanca of approval. Ha notad that currant City standards raquira a rural roadway to ba pavad at a 24 width with 3* shouldars. or a pavad araa of 28* with curb and guttar. Ha notad tha disadvantaga of Laaf Straat is that It is so straight. Qoattan askad tha spaad limit of tha road. Garhardson said it is 30 MFH. Jabbour askad whan tha road Is raconstructad. If It has to follow fturrant standards. Cook raportad that tha City allows iwpiacamant in kind. Jabbour suggastad staking tha straat at tha minimum tha City would allow and tha width of a MSA road. Qoait Polica Oapartmant patroi tha araa mors. Pat Crans statad ha signad tha pat It Ion basad on Information that ha was unsura about, but through tha discussion his quastlons hava baan answarad. Ha fait tha diffaranca In tha pavad araa was inslgnlfleant and stataJ ha would rathar aava tha monay on tha assassmant. C.C. Graham, 99 Laaf Straat, fait that tha widaning of tha road would changa tha charactar of tha araa. Sha raquaatad that tha Council approach this Issua with graat caution. •rian Shalt, 140 Laaf Straat, notad ha has small chlldran, but doas not allow tham to rida on tha road currantly. Ha notad tha diffaranca batwaan a 28* road and a 32* road may daatroy pIna traas on hi a proparty. Sahrman askad why Laaf Straat was tha only straat singlad out. dn A ;! ■’iP ■•r' V-i* r I ; MIHUTF-S OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 8, 1992 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS - LEAF STREET - CONT. Butitr r«mind«d h«r that In ordar to b« a MSA straat, it must connact with anothar MSA atraat at aach and. Cook notad that Cygnat Placa probably would not maat tha crI tar I a for a MSA atraat bacauta of tha vartical alignmant. Ehalt askad if tha hill on Laaf Straat would ba changad. Cook said It may ba changad slightly. 011 la Pataraon. 475 Oxford Road, said sha travais tha road oftan and fait it would ba safar at a widar width. Goattan atkad if a fog lina could ba addad to tha slda of tha road for bikars. Ehalt fait that would taka away from tha rural charactar. Mayor Pataraon atkad if brush and shrubs ara ramovad from privata prooarty during tha projact. If thay would ba rapiacad by tha City. Garhardson said that would ba a nossibility. Motion: Ayas 5, nays 0. Jabbour suggastad thay staka tha araa of tha sawar projact also. (814) USE OF COM FUNDS FOR 8TUSS8 OAY SEWER SERVICE CONNECTION C08T8 Noorsa axplalnad that ha has discustad this issua with Larry Oiaekstad from tha County who has indieatad that tha funds can ba usad in two ways: 1. Using tha nonay for tha actual assassiaant, which would raguira an ant Ira araa to qualify for tha usa of tha funds. Ha notad that tha dollar amount allocatad to tha City would only pay for a coupla proparty assassmants. 2. Using tha funds for tha cost of tha sawar connaction from tha I stars I to tha rasidanca. Ha notad that staff racommands tha saeond altarnativa. Ha said that Council should datarmlna If thay wish to usa 1992 or 1993 funds or both. L.-'i. ■ ■: ii'iTtilihrMima ‘•ii ■■■'i .. ■ :vi V# ":i J? V---' '■I r- k. r' MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE a, 1992 CDBQ FUNDS - CONT. Jtbbour f«lt that tinea tha Council hat allocated a portion o1 the 1992 fundt to home Improvement, they could ute that amount for the aewer project. Goetten felt that if there are people In need of the fundt for other Improvementt* they thould not be denied. Moorte tald that the County it currently acceptinp aoplicatlont for the fundt for 1992. Butler noted the tewer will not be ready for connection until 1993 Gerhardton indicated that the City hat 1 1/2 yeart to expend the money. Goetten felt that tinea the money won't be needed until 1993* they thould not ute 1992 fundt. Jabbour ditapreed and felt that the propertiet on Lake Street and next to the public landinp are in preat need of the tewer and felt that the City thould encourape immediate hookup. Gerhardton reported that the 1993 fundt will be available at of July 1993. Jabbour withdrew hit objection. All Membert apreed that they would not ute the 1992 COBG fundt for the Stubbt Bay Sewer tervice connection cotta. IP1B) AMARO OF BIOS FOR FUBUC WORKS FACILITY SOUIFMWT Moorte explained that the holet it the number one priority to award at It needt to be inatalled early in the project. He added that there are itema in the tervice eaulpawnt tact Ion that thould be Inatalled within the early portion of tha project. Me atatad thay would continua to review the fuel diatrlbution ayatem, and tha ovarhead cranet do not fit into the budpet. Jabbour atked if the amount lieted for the fuel diatrlbution eyat wat correct. Moorte etated that it the bid price* which alto Included a number of other itema. 12 ■V" • ■ ■ -V • ■ 2 ■ M r’ 54ri |r i F'-. r': 4- ■ I f- l> fcs;. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 8. 1992 COBQ FUNDS - CONT. Jabbour fait that sinca tha Council hat aliocatad a portion of tha 1992 funds to homa Improvamant, they could usa that amount for tha tawar proJact. Qoattan fait that If thara ara paopla In naad of tha funds for othar Improvamants, thay should not ba dan I ad. Hoorsa said that tha County is currantly accapting applications for tha funds for 1992. Sutlar notad tha tawar will not ba raady for connactlon until 1993. Garhardson Indicatad that tha City has l 1/2 years to expand tha money. Qoattan fait that since tha money won’t ba needed until 1993, thay should not usa 1992 funds. Jabbour disagreed and fait that tha properties on Lake Street and next to tha public landing k in great naad of tha sawar and fait that tha City should ancouraaa immediate hookup. Garhardson reported that tha 1993 funds will ba available as of July 1993. Jabbour withdraw his objection. All Naaibars agreed that thay would not usa tha 1992 CDSO funds for tha Stubba Bay Bawar sarvica connection coats. (818} AWARO OF BIOS FOR PUBLIC PORKS FACILITY EQUIPHiNT ovarhaad cranes do not fit Into tha budget. Jabbour asked if tha amount listed for the fuel distribution system was correct. Moorsa stated that is tha bid erica, which also included a number of othar items. - .J 9" / / 4 % MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 8. 1992 AWARD OF BIDS FOR PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY EQUIPMENT - CONT. ...tour .iron,.Y yllr'loo'o rndVxc'..»rv. insur^ance requirements for in-ground tanks. Moorse explained that the contractor felt that the cost of both above-ground and in-ground systems are very equal. It was moved by Jabbour, *®'^°'’2®'Li ’/er*fn'^ t^hV^row^bid* Mount of JlS'lir Md*‘to^iw^r‘d%rs%rrce”:;u*U"nt'5?d'?o Zah. in the iow bid’amount of $31,712. Ayes 5, nays 0. ($16) FINAL PAYMENTS ON COUNTY ROAD 15 STREET AND LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS Moorse requested this item to be tabled to the r.e.t meeting. Improvements to the next meeting. Ayes 5. nays 0. (*»17) PHEASANT LAWN GOOSE RELOCATION PROGRAM 1992. Ayes 5, nays 0. Ray Hartman, representing residents of He noted this is the fourth y®«" ropped from S;§»;r6o ‘.'’“^r-f.rt°?t -'*"rd^1Jlcu. to tot., ,^y ^e, ,m,n... j:°‘;n“to’c::si*d7r th'lL arrn"orgoing pro^gram. ind perhaps City- M i de. Goetten suggested he submit a prooosal to the City Administ (••18) TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE - PARK DEPARTMENT It was moved by Jabbour, seconded ^^^gtreatV as^a temocrary •iTiD I oymen t of Stephen Carlson, 1 8 > ^ qq cer nour park maintenance heloer at an hourly rate of $7.jc effective June 9. i992. Ayes 5, nays 0. •J MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 8, 1992 (••19) 1992 POLICE LIEUTENANT CONTRACT SETTLEMENT It was movad by Jabbour, seeondad by Butler, to approve the contract settlement, to authorize the City Administrator to prepare H:VrVc\ ::^;i:rrif..ctlng the *«tt..™.nt l.ens and to .„thor.|. th* Mayor and City Administrator to sign the contract. Ayes a, nays 0. (•20) ATTORNEY’S REPORT ~ EXECUTIVE SESSION It was moved by Butler, seconded by Goetten. to adjourn the regular CouncIlTeetinVat 8:4S p.m. to Executive Session. Ayes 5. nays 0. (••21) LICENSES It was mov«d by Jabbour, following llcensas: seconded by Butler, to approve the Kennel License - Res I dent I al_L Stephen G. Esco, 230 Big Island Rodney Crawford, 4705 North Shore Drive Garbaoe i Refuse Collectorj Westonka Sanitation Motion, Ayes 5, nays 0. Mayor Peterson questioned the amount t<^Strgar Roscoe Fausch. # Moorse stated he would check into it. It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by payment of the AM Funds Account, as revised. Ayes 5, nays o. Butler asked Chief Sullivan about an accident on County Road 15 on the previous Friday. Sullivan raportad that two cart wara travalIng wastbound.ona triad to paaa on tha right and waa hit by a car marging trq^ a alda •tr««t. Three people were hospitalized. Jabbour announced that Sullivan would be In Jail on June 22. Sullivan clarified that he was being Jailed by Chapter of the American Cancer Society to raise funds through bail. Callahan asked If there an unpaInted patrol car In Spring Park. Sullivan noted they are waiting for the striping. :-'v i ' ;r;; -i;.. i-i- 'i-' '■’V. ■’ ■■'' ^i|irm MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 8, 1992 (••19) 1992 POLICE LIEUTENANT CONTRACT SETTLEMENT It was movad by Jabbour, aacondad by But Iar, to approva tha contract aattlamant. to authorize tha City Adminiatrator to prepare contract ianguasa reflecting tha aattlament I tame* and to authorize tha Mayor and City Adminiatrator to aign tha contract. Ayaa 5. naya 0. (•20) ATTORNEY’S REPORT - EXECUTIVE SESSION It waa aiovad by Butlar, aacondad by Goattan, to adjourn tha regular Council moating at 8:45 p.m. to Executive Saaaion. Ayaa 5, naya 0. (••21) LICENSES It waa moved by Jabbour, following iicanaaa: aacondad by Butler* to approva tha Kennel Licanaa * Reaidentiai; Stephan G. Eaco, 230 Big Island Rodney Crawford, 4705 North Shore Drive Waatonka Sanitation Motion, Ayaa 5, naya 0. (•22) BILLSMayor Pataraon quaationad tha amount to Strgar Roacoa Fauach. Noorsa atatad ha would check into it. It waa aiovad by Mayor Pataraon, aacondad by Goattan, to approva payaiant of tha All Funda Account, aa ravlaad. Ayaa S, naya 0. Butlar aakad Chiaf Sullivan about an accidant on County Road 15 on tha pravioua Friday. Sullivan raportad that two cara ware traval Ing waatbound, ona triad to pass on tha right and waa hit by a car marging from a alda atraat. Thraa paopla wara hospitalIzad. Jabbour announcad that Sullivan would ba In jail on June 22. Sullivan ciarifiad that ha was baing Jailed by tha Lake Minnetonka Chapter of tha Aaiarlcan Cancer Society to raise funds through ball. Callahan asked If there was an unpaintad patrol car in Spring Park. Sullivan noted they are waiting for tha striping. •i M •V 0 . ‘•t: 7- EM I: MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 8, 1992 ADJOURNMENT It wtt mov«d by 6uti«r, s«cond«d by Jabbour, to adjourn tho Exacutiva Sassion of tha Council at 9:45 p.m. ATTtfT: Barbara A. Patarson, Mayor thy/trHHalI in. City Clark m rf'i * t MBNDA POac COOMCIL KBBTING BBT FOB HONOAT, JONB B, lfB2, 7tBB F.M. (*)Asterisk items sre considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon request. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. ROLL CALL 1. CONSENT AGENDA* APPROVAL OP MIHOTBB ^OUNCll MEETING “fyoftmom 2. Regular Meeting of May 26, 1992 3. Continued Public Hearing - Stubbs Bay Sewer Assessment Hearing May 18, 1992 PARR CONHIBBIOM COHHI PLAM1R6 C0HH1S8I0H COHHBRTB - Stephen Peterson Representative PUBLIC COHNBMTB - (Liait 5 Minates Per Person) B0B1B8 AOHIBIBTRATOR'B RBPORT ••APPLICABTB** leaediately after the Coencil bee reeleeetf your sppllcetioo please aioo the three (3) original resolntiona at the Recorder's desk. Applicants need not esecete resolntiona for sobdivisions, vacations end denials. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8 9. #1679 Milliam Miller, 2691 Casco Point Road - Variance #1724 - Tammy L. Woodis, 2818 Casco Point Road - Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Resolution #1729 Clair Rood, 328B Navarre Lane - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Resolution #1731 Clair Rood - 2215 Kenwood Way - Variance - Resolution #1734 John Burger, 375B Bayside Road - Preliminary Subdivision - Resolution #1736 Gregory C. Peterson, 1920 Shoreline Drive - Renewal Variance - Resolution • •CIL RBPORT BBQIHBBR RBPORT 10. Bid Award Lift Station #9 Renovation 11. Bid Award 1992 Seal Coat Project 13. CITT AOHIBIBTRATOR'B RBPORT 12. Award of Bids for Stubbs Bay Sewer Project Preparation of Plans and Specifications for Reconstruction of Leaf Street - Resolution Use of CDBG Funds for Stubbs Bay Sewer Service Connection Costs Award of Bids for Public Works Facility Equipment Final Payments on County Road 15 Street and Lighting Improvements 14. 15. 16. -tv mtMDh FOK COOMCIL MIBTING SIT FOR NOMDST, JOMB S, lf92, 7sff P.H. CITY SONIMISTRATOR'S RBFORT Continued * 17. Pheasant Lawn Goose Relocation Program * 18. Temporary Employee - Park Department * 19. 1992 Police Lieutenant Contract Settlement CITY ArronniT*s ibport 20. Request for Executive Session LICBHSBS (21*) •ILLS (22*‘) LOJOORIMBIIf IMFORHATIOM ITEHS IWCLUPED IN COUNCIL PACKET Ninutes of orono Planning commission 5/18/92 Meeting Park Commiaaion 8/2/92 Agenda a Draft Ninutes of 4/8/92 Meeting Lake Minentonka Conservation District Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Hennepin County Old Tyme Fair Orono Planning Coamiisoion Notice LMCD Environmental Committee Letter to Commissioner Rod Sando Dated 8/4/92 Miscellaneous fO ISSOBS AMD IVBliTS - Couoei'i Needing'p.m. •8/11 • Lake Dae Committee 7:45 a.m. 08/15 • Planning Commission 7 p.m. 08/22 - Work Seaaion 8 p.m. Metropolitan Council Rural Development Policies - Barb Sennas •8/22 - Council Meeting 7 p.m. 07/03 - Holiday - Independence Day Observed (Friday) 07/07 - Park Commission 7 p.m. 07/13 - Council Meeting 7 p.m. •7/20 - Planning Commission 7 p.m. 07/27 - Council Meeting 7 p.m. r’ 'V.! P tannine; Coiriiiissicn Council PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print) riu lU' 0^. 4 5.^ CL.c^ 6 8. ( 1^ 9. 10. 11. 12 13 14. m f 15^ 16. 17^ 18. 19. 20. ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) -jEu-^a 4 t / /-? ^r \ •< Iftrb f]n{r . ? 1 ♦ Cf ■H. Sc A MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 26, 1992 f^fty a ROLL ^6 Th« Council mot on th« abov« data with tha following mamoifs prasart: Mayor Barbara Patarson, councilntambars Gabrlal Jabbour, J. DIann Goattan, Mary Butlar and Edward Callahan. Tha following raprasantad tha City ataff: City Administrator Ron Moorsa, Public Works Oiractor John Garhardson, Building A Zoning Administrator Jaanna Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michaal Gaffron, PoMca Chiaf Staphan Sullivan, City Attornay Tom Barratt, City Enginaar G!ann Cook and City Racordar Tar I Naab. Mayor Patarson caliad tha maating to ordar at 7:00 P.M. (•1) CONSENT AGENDA Jabbour addad Itams «9 and 11 to tha consant aganda. It was movad by Jabbour, sacondad by Butlar, to approva tha Consant Aganda as amandad. Ayas 5, nays 0. Motions for all itams adoptad by consant agenda will ba includad In tha minutas in thair raspactiva numerical ordar. (a«2, 364) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was movad by Jabbour, sacondad by Butlar, to approva tha minutas of the regular meeting of the Orono Council held on May 11, 1992; tha minutas of the Reconvened Board of Review meeting held on May 11, 1992; and tha minutas of tha Stubbs Bay Assessment Hearing held on May 4, 1992. Ayas 5, nays 0. LMCO REPRESENTATIVE’S COMMENTS JoEMen Hurr was present and noted tha next Board maating of tha LMCO will ba held on Wednesday, May 27, 1992. She noted tha LMCO has aatabllshad a subcommittee to study tha sale of non-fuel Itams from docks. Goattan expressed concern that food wrappers may and up In tha I aka. Hur*- stated that the Water Patrol has made four arrests to data for BWIs. She reported that a subcommittee mat on May 9, 1992 to discuss water structures and Is recommending denial of the request of Forest Arms residents to redesign their docks. Callahan noted the charter boats ware discussed at tha May 18th meeting. sJ HINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 26, 1992 LNCD REPRESENTATIVE'S COMMENTS - CONT. Hurr stated aha ia primarily Interasted In whera thasa boats ara dockad and notad tha LMCD Is unabla to control any zoning issues with ragards to thasa boats. She said tha LMCD and tha watar Patrol both licansa thasa boats. Jabbour statad that tha LMCD does not licansa whera boarding of thasa boats occur and doas not concern itself with parking issues related with this sarvica. Hurr indicated that tha LMCD has asked that tha businesses have tha ability for parking for their customers. Callahan asked about tha issue of boat clubs. Hurr statad that tha LMCD has made no decision on this issue. Callahan said that It appears that Inland Marina at 1960 Shoreline Drive has decided to have a boat club. Jabbour notad that Lakeside Marina has a boat club too. Callahan notad that one requirement of tha conditional use permit for Inland Marina Is that there shall be no business which is connected to that across tha street. Jabbour suggested tha City find them in violation and close tha business down. Hurr announced that tha LMCD has created an envlronmental committee. She noted that at the last meeting, no one from Orono Mas present and reported the next meeting will be held on Tuesday, June 9th at 8:30 at the LMCD office. She announced that the LMCD has scheduled a tour of the Lake for the Commissioner of the ONR for Thursday, May 28th at 1:00 and Invited the Council to attend. PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Lap inski asked If he could address the Council regarding tha need for a variance for a stairway off his deck. He questioned the necessity of such a variance. Mayor Peterson explained that the variance is for the increase in structural hardcover within the 76-250* zone where excesses already exist. Mabusth explained that there is no Increase In hardcover, but there is an intensification of the structure. MINUTE8 OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 26, 1992 PUBLIC COMMENTS > CONT. Lapinski said that staff Mas unable to show him the ordinance prohibiting the Intensification of hardcover. He stated he would not be extending past the limits of the current building and the deck has been there for 20 years and the stairs would go over existing hardcover. Lapinski said he has a shower and wedding coming up in the near future and would be willing to get the permit, but wanted to speed up the process. He said he has the largest lot in the cove on an acre and a half and is set back further than adjacent neighbors. Mabusth explained that 6 years ago the Planning Commission and Council developed a review process differentiating between structural and non-structural hardcover. She noted that it has been the practice of the Council to review any application which intensifies structural hardcover where excessive hardcover exists. She noted that a cursory review of the property Indicates 75* hardcover In the 75-250’ zone. Lapinski said that the Building Inspector was out inspecting the neighboring building project and noticed the repairs he was doing to his deck. They reviewed the plans rcr tne stairway and was told by the inspector that the stairs could not come off the side as It would be encroaching the neighboring property. The Inspector explained where the stairs would be acceptable and informed him that If the stairs were to go through the existing deck there would be no problem. The plans wero regies Igned to what is being proposed. He stated that upon submitta' for a permit, he was told that he would need a variance as he was Intensifying the structure and expanding beyond the defined boundaries of the deck. Qoetten stated that Lapinski is over the allowed limit of 25* hardcover for that zone. She said that Orono is very concerned with run-off to the lake and therefore has zoned lakeshore property and only allows a percentage of hardcover within each zone. Shs stated that many older homes are over those allowed percentages, and those are reviewed as improvements are requested for the property. Jabbour explained that the existing hardcover on the property may be non-conforming and Illegal. He stated that as properties are redeveloped, they are reviewed for conformance with the ordinances. Lapinski said the neighbor next door has built a deck which extends much further out. HINUTE8 OF THE RCOULAH ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 20, 1992 PUBLIC COMMENTS - CONT. Mabusth notod that tha naighbor has baan advisad that ha must fits an aftar-tha-fact varianca application for construction without a buliding parmit. Jabbour atatad that tha naighbor may ba askad to ramova tha dack if found not to ba in conformanca. Lapinski said that ha would fight tha Council if thay raquirad him to ramova any of tha hardcovar currant Iy axisting on tha proparty. (a98) •ie9B <IIM RIVERS. 1442 SHORELINE DRIVE - AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3122 It WAS niovad by Jabbour, aacondad by But Iar, to adopt Rasolution #3122 for Application #1698 for Jim RIvars, 1442 ShoraIJna Orlva. for an aftar-tha-fact varianca. Ayas 5, nays 0. (#6) 91732 JOAN SWEETSER, B4S OLD LONG LAKE ROAD - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION 93123 Moorsa axplainad that this is a two lot subdivision application. Mayor Patarson askad about tha Park Dadicatirn faa. Mabuath axplainad that savarai yaars ago a chraa lot subdivision was proposad for this proparty but was navar raviawad or actad on by tha Council. This currant application is bound by tha naw Park Dadicat ion Ordinanca. It was movad by Butiar, sacondad by Callahan, to adopt Rasolution S3123 for Application 91732 for Joan Swaatsar of 846 Old Long Laka Road, for praiimlnary subdivision approval. Ayas 5, nays 0. (97) 91733 TEMPLE ISRAEL (CAMP TEKO), §48 TONKANA ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERNIT/VARIANCE - RESOLUTION 93124 Julius Bronkofski was prasant. Moorsa axplainad this is an application for a conditional usa parmit and varianca to anabia maintananca aitarnations to a drainaga swala for tha camp which is naadad dua to significant arosion. Ha notad tha drainaga araa is proposad to ba rip-rappad. Ooattan askad If all tha concarns addrassad by Shawn Gustafson of Bonastroo would ba takan cars of with thasa improvamants. w MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 26. 1992 ZONING FILE #1733 - CONT. Mdbusth exp’ained that to maintain th« 3:1 slopes recommended by the Engineer, the bank will need to be excavated and that is the reason for asking for more detailed grading plans that wlI I Include alterations of the bank. Goetten asked if the City hes received the opinion of the other reviewing entities on this issue. Mabusth confirmed that the lHatershed District approved the permit last Thursday and has informed the City of the conditions of approval. She stated that the DNR and the Army Corp of Engineers will not require a permit review. Jabbour stated that the Camp has ceen a good neighbor at large. He expressed concern about improving the road to the lake which may fad I 1tate further building action near the lakeshore and suggested that staff inform tbe applicant of regulatjors pertaining to the Iakeshore. Mabusth noted that during the review it was discovered that the Camp is on two Individual parcels and will be asked for the legal combination of these parcels. BronkofskI said that would not be a problem. He stated the main reason for upgrading the trail is to give better access to youngsters in wheelchairs. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3124 for Application S1733 for Temple Israel iCamp Teko) at 645 Tonkawa Road, for a conditional use permit and variance to allow the maintenance alterations to the drainageway and trail. Ayes 5, nays 0. (•8) JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE - BIG ISLAND VET’S CAW» - RESOLUTION *3125 Callahan stated he would I Ike the condition added to the resolution prohibiting floating styrofoam docks. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution •3125 and directing staff to issue a joint Use Dock License to the Board of Governors, Big Island Veterans’ Camp for the period of January 1, 1992 to December 31, 1992, with the addition of a condition prohibiting the use of floating styrofoam docks. Ayes 5, nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 20, 1992 («9) PROPOSED RESPONSE TO DNR - SHORELAND FLEXIBILITY REQUEST It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to agree to revise the steep slope definition in the Shoreland Ordinance to 12X to be consistent with ONR standards, and to direct staff to forward to a letter \.o the DNR which gives a basis for Justification to reauire no iakeshore setback for lock boxes. Ayes 5, nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT A) Callahan stated that the Lake Use Committee has been trying to deal with the issue of licensing marinas. Letters have been sent to Windward Marina, Minnetonka Boat Works, Sailors World and Crystal Bay Service regarding their licenses. The Committee has been working on draft letters to Gayles Marina, Lakeside Marina and North Shore Drive Marina reviewing their violations. He reviewed a draft letter to Gayles Marina which indicates operation must cease immediately. It has been decided that letters to the other two marinas will point out the violation of boats and slips in excess of that which is licensed by the City. He suggested that Council direct staff to send letters to Gayles Marina, Lakeside Marina and North Shore Marina by Friday of this week. Gaffron noted that Gayles Marina has not applied for nor paid the 1992 Iicense. Jabbour asked about Lakeside Marina. Gaffron indicated that a drive-by inspection this week of property at 3350 North Shore Drive indicated that the property is suddenly being used for storage of employee vehicles. Jabbour asked If they could act on the application pending from 1985 regarding this residential property. Gaffron referred to a letter sent last week to Lakeside Marina which Indicates that cominercial use of that property must cease immediately. The letter states that the vioiat ions must be resolved and directs the owner to contact City staff. Jabbour suggested staff remind the owner of past court action regarding storage of boats on shore. Gaffron noted that has been included within the letter. Jabbour asked If there had been an accident there recently. .. eeuB MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 26. 1992 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. Chief Sullivan reported that an elderly lady went off the road near Bohns Point, hit a pedestrian, the fence and a tree. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Jabbour, to authorize the appropriate Individual to sign and send the letter to Gayles Marina as soon as possible. Ayes 5, nays 0. Gaffron reported that last week Gayles Marina verbally asked If they would be allowed to rebuild the sign outside their business. All Council Members agreed that If they do not have a license to operate, approval should not be granted for the sign. Barrett explained that the Council has two remedies to the situation. The first would be to find the properties In violation of the ordinances and prosecute as a misdemeanor, and the second would be to bring civil action against the operation of the marina which would require a court order to stop the business and Is more expensive and a slower process. Jabbour asked If they could not require a performance bond for these licenses. Callahan noted that In the case of Windward Marina, a letter has been sent telling them to cease operation until payment for the 1991 license fee is received. Gaffron noted that a letter has been sent, and the letter also requests the completion of required Items such as paving the parking lot by mid summer. He stated the letter did not specifically say that the operation will be closed down if the Marina does not comply. Callahan stated that since Windwarv. Marina Is In violation and has been warned a number of times. If payment Is not received In another week, staff should send a reminder note. Jabbour reminded him that when the Council discussed the issue of fees and it appeared In the newspaper that Windward Marina had not yet paid. Rivers contacted the City and said the least they could do was send a letter reminding him. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to authorize sending the letters to Lakeside Marina and North Shore Marina. Ayes 5, nayo 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 26, 1992 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. B) Callahan reported that a draft ordinance prohibiting styrofoam docks will be brought to the Council for review. He directed staff to notify all marina owners of the proposed ordinance. Jabbour noted that positive comments have been published In newspaper regarding such an ordinance. the Callahan informed the Council that the partial removal of styrofoam docks for subsequent removals in years following. ordI nance the 1993 wi I I require season, with Gaffron noted that as a proposed zoning ordinance amendment, there will need to be a public hearing published prior to adoption and therefore could not be brought to the Council until after the July Planning Commission meeting. C) Mayor Peterson stated that Inland Marina has had more than 7 boats parked on site, which is in violation of their conditional use permit approval. Jabbour suggested to an Interested neighboring property owner that he photograph all violations of the property. Barrett suggested that staff check the code for procedures to follow if they find the property in violation of the approval. Jabbour suggested that they cancel the conditional use permit approval If found to be In violation. He stated that he told Mr. Gilbert that the City would be anxious to revert the property to residential use. Callahan directed staff to remind the owners of Inland Marina that they are not to cross the road in conjunction with their business operations. Jabbour felt that the City should do anything within the limits of the City code to see the property revert back to a residential use. Barrett stated that the code provides that conditional use permit approval is not subject to review unless it is found to be in violation of the municipal code. Mabusth said they would send a letter to the owner and start to document any violations found on the property. 0) Goetten asked If the Mayor of Long Lake was specifically Invited to the joint meetings between the Councils. 8 . ! sIl... ■■MIlSkdH MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 26, 1992 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. Mayor Peterson stated she was not but to both subsequent meetings. invited to the initial meeting, Jabbour noted that the meetings were announced at Council meetings which are public meetings. Butler suggested the Council quit talking to the City of Long Lake. Jabbour said that he did not trust anything that Mayor Swartwood says, and felt that it is she who has undermined the relationship between Orono and Long Lake, and felt that her behavior as a Mayor is Inappropriate. Mayor Peterson said that Maple Plain and Long Lake have discussed their joint powers agreement, and Mayor Swartwood felt that It was strictly a financial agreement. Jabbour reminded the Council that Orono had brought up the Joint powers agreement prior to the meetings and Long Lake had chosen to ignore it. (•10) COUNTY ROAD 15 MSA EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS - RESOLUTION #3126 City Engineer Cook explained that this is the County Road 15 project constructed by Hennepin County west of County Road 19 to Spring Park. The City originally expected to use $200,000 from State aid funds for the project, but the right-of-way in slightly higher than anticipated, requiring usage of additional State Aid Funds. Mayor Peterson asked about the Navarre business signs. Qerhardson noted they are on order. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, Resolution #3126, authorizing the use of $165,253.00 of MSA tunds toward the City’s share of the cost for the reconstruction of County Road 15. Ayes 5, nays 0. (Sill) SPEED LIMIT POSTING EAST LONG LAKE ROAD RESOLUTION «3127 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to adopt Resolution •3127 authorizing a 30 miles per hour speed limit for East Long Lake Road. Ayes 5, nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 26, 1992 (•12) METROPOLITAN COUNCIL RURAL SERVICE AREA POLICES - 64/640 Moorse explained that this Is a summary of Information received from the Metropolitan Council regarding their rural service area polIces. Goetten asked who was pressuring the Met Council to do this. Moorse explained the pressure Is coming from the central cities. Mayor Peterson tentatively scheduled a workshop to discuss this issue on June 8, 1992 at 6:00 p.m. («13) APPLICATION OF CERTIFICATE OF PAYMENT #3: KRAUS ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY GRESSER CONCRETE/MASONRY 8TEININGER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY MET’CON CONSTRUCTION Moorse explained this Is a request for payment. He noted that the City has obtained lean waivers for previous work. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve City Hall and Public Works Buildings Applications and Certificates of Payment No. 3 for April construction manager fee and reimbursable expenses to Kraus-Anderson In the amount of $29,494.96; for public works building concrete work to Gresser Concrete/Masonry In the amount of $74,424.60; for site preparation toStelnInger Construction Co. in the amount of $74,413.90; and for public works building erection to Met-Con Construction In the amount of $9,130.00. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*•14) BIO AWARD UTILITY TRACTOR It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to award bid for the Utility Tractor to Scharber and Sons for an amount of $23,896.00. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*•18) 1991 BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to approve the budget adjustments as presented and to authorize the use of $53,325.00 from the General Fund Reserve to offset the General Fund revenue shortfall. Ayes 6, nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 26, 1992 (*i16) TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE - PARK DEPARTMENT It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to authorize the employment of John Heuer, 5625 Bush Road, Mound as a temporary park maintenance helper at an hourly rate of $7.50 per hour effective May 18, 1992. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*•17) SALARY AND PERFORMANCE REVIEW - GREG PALMER, MAINTENANCE WORKER It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to adjust Greg Palmer’s hourly rate to Level 5, Step 3 of the Compensation Plan, $12,520 per hour effective May 21, 1992. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*•18) LICENSES It was moved by Jabbour, following 1 I censes: seconded by Butler, to approve the Special Event: IN Bass Tournaments - June 28, 1992 6:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. North Shore Marina IN Bass Tournaments - September 20, 1992 6:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. North Shore Marina One Day Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor: Northwest Tonka Lions - Juno 19, 1992 Lakeview Golf Club Garbage * Refuse License: Blackowiak & Son Sanitation & Rolloff Service Baldy Sanitation Inc. Res I dent Ial KenneI: L. James & Kathleen Marier, 2776 White Oak Circl Septic System Installer: Dave Perkins Contracting Sewerman - Merlin’s Motion, Ayes 5, nays 0. JoEllen Hurr stated that she has requested that the LMCD notify the City of ail special events licenses that the LMCD approves. She noted that If a property is not In compliance, such as North Shore Marina, it should not be issued a special events permit. She also noted the Council’s concern over parking Issues, and felt the bass tournament may be a problem In that respect. -1 i\ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 26, 1992 LICENSES - CONT. Sullivan noted he approved the organization requesting the permit, not the location of the event. Jabbour suggested they mention the license for the bass tournament In the letter going to North Shore Marina, and suggest that If the marina license is not issued, the license for the bass tournament may be revoked. (*•19) BILLS It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Ayes 5, nays 0. ATTORNEY’S REPORT It was moved by Butler, seconded by Goetten, to adjourn the regular Council meeting at 8:28 p.m. to Executive Session to discuss pending litigation. Ayes 5, nays 0. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Jabbour to adjourn the Executive Session of the Council at _ _ _ p.m. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST; Dorothy M. Hal I in. City Clerk ■aWlaaiittMl ---------------4 •. 1^1 t I'4 MINUTES OP THE CONTINUATION OF THE STUBBS BAY ASSESS HELD BY THE ORONO COUNCIL ON HELD MAY 18, 1992 MT HEARING ROLL The Council met on the above date with the fol lowlng^«n|jaers present: Mayor Barbara Peterson, CouncIImembers Gabriel JaoBlffr, Edward Callahan, J. Diann Goetten and Mary Butler. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, Finance Director Tom Kuehn, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, City Attorney Tom Barrett, City Engineer Glenn Cook, and City Recorder Terl Naab. Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:08 P.M. Mayor Peterson noted that this meeting Is a continuation of the public hearing for the Stubbs Bay Assessment. The meeting was continued to allow Mr. Knight, an attorney representing residents In the area, time to meet with the City and to get answers to their quest Ions. Mr. Knight said he has communicated several times with the City and has submitted a proposal to the City Administrator Moorse. He explained the principal concern of his clients is the cost of the project. He stated the consensus of the residents he represents is that they would like sewer but disagree with the cost and would like to see an extension to the required hookup time period. He stated the proposal he submitted did not exclude any parcel. He expressed his clients’ feeling that the value of their homes do justify a lower sewer charge. Lee Harren. 175 Landmark Drive, said he has sent several letters to the Council stating his opposition of Inclusion. He explained his house was constructed In 1989 on a 2**' acre parcel with primary and alternate septic sites. He stated the City Engineer indicated to him that the only reason for Inclusion was that the neighboring property to the west needed sewer which could be run through his property, but that was deemed undesirable as it would run approximately 400’ through a wooded area. He stated he Is currently being included through a lateral from the east. He asked the Council to consider his property to be excluded from the project and asked that he get a response from the Council in writing. 01 Me Peterson. 475 Oxford Road, said that the houses on Oxford Road are alI newer and are alI on 2+ acre lots. She stated that 7 of the 9 property owners on that street are opposed to the project. Jabbour asked to have It clarified If the residents of Cygnet Place and Oxford Road wished to be Included with the project. 1 MINUTES OF THE CONTINUATION OF THE STUBBS BAY ASSESSMENT HEARING HELD BY THE ORONO COUNCIL ON HELD MAY 18, 1992 Joa Demeo. 400 Oxford Road, stated that many of the residents In that area wish to be inciuded if the price is right. He said they were hoping to have a counter offer to the proposal that they had submitted through Mr. Knight. Goetten understood that there was criteria that properties would need to meet to be excluded from the project. Dennis Shaw. 405 Oxford Road, stated they feel excluded from the whole process. He tried to Join the citizens’ advisory committee and was discouraged from Joining. Knight clarified that the consensus of his group is that they would agree with the sewer at an acceptable price, but at the current proposed assessment, wished to be excluded from the project. Goetten said, "tley can’t have it all”. Mayor Peterson asked what they consider an acceptable price. Knight said that the proposal residents he represents want. he submitted states what the Goetten clarified that the group Knight represents want the taxpayers of Orono to pay a large portion of the project. She stated that the Council, in good faith, decided to pay 30% of the proj ect. Knight said they were hoping the City would counter their proposal. Uabbour explained that the present Council decided to assess via an appraisal process to determine the potential of a property and what would stand '.p In court. He felt that property owners should not feel Impelled to hire a lawyer to get what is fair to them. He stated that if the citizens that Knight represents feel that they have not had enough time to study the project, they should be allowed more time, but he felt the base of the project should continue. He stated that the original intent was to run the sewer line across the lakeshore portion of the property on Oxford Road but due to the request of the residents, was changed to run down the street which made the assessment for that area higher. Shaw noted that to allow connection for a failing system, the line needed to run down the road. Jabbour said ho does not have a problem allowing additional time r MINUTES OF THE CONTINUATION OF THE STUBBS BAY ASSESSMENT HEARING HELD BY THE ORONO COUNCIL ON HELD MAY 18, 1992 to hook up If the septic system Is functioning properly. Dave Peterson. 2625 Fox Street, stated he was on the advisory committee. He said he Is not a part of this project but his mother’s property Is Involved. He noted that his septic system has recently failed, and on a 2 1/2 acre parcel, cannot find an alternate site. He stated that the life expectancy of a septic system is 20 years. He reminded them that n-)thing can be built on an alternate site and it cannot be driven on. He stated It will cost him more to restore his system than the sewer project will cost any of them. He stated to Shaw that the advisory committee’s Intent was to welcome anyone wishing to be Involved. Pat Crane. 285 Leaf Street, stated he is part of the Cygnet Place area. He said he preferred to be a part of the project but felt that the Council pulled a figure out of a box. He stated It appears that they determined the cost of the base area, then included the additional areas at a higher cost. He felt that the entire project should be figured on a per unit basis, making the cost of the project for everyone $10,762.00, less the amount retained In the contingency fund at $730.00 per parcel. He felt it was unfair that an area would get service for less than another. Terry Olsen. 3640 Bavside Road, said he accepts the project but questioned why those In need of the service are paying less for the project. He said he had a problem with a mandatory hookup If the current system is functioning. Linda WhItman. 3620 Eileen Street, stated she originally requested to be excluded from the project, but has changed her position. She stated they would Ske to be included but do not want to be forced to hook up I mmedlately. She noted they wouId like some possibI * Ity of negotiating the as;!essment. Mike FInnIev. 3425 Eastlaka Street, said he was In favor of the project, but felt that It should not be assessed on a per unit basis as he has a very small lot with a cabin. David Use. 3630 Eileen Street, stated they would like to be included but objected to the required hookup. He said he would like to see the contingency fund returned to the property owners. Don Gronberq. 110 Leaf Street, explained that there is a dam on hie property. He said he was one of the first to purchase a lot In this area, and when he did so the creek was not flooded. The dam was Installed with the blessings of the DNR In 1960~61. He stated that there Is a valve that Is used to release the water f MINUTES OF THE CONTINUATION OF THE STUBBS BAY ASSESSMENT HEARING HELD BY THE ORONO COUNCIL ON HELD MAY 18, 1992 Which may change the setbacks required to the creek. He asked If the dam were to go out, who could be required to pay for restoration. He asked that the Council further consider this property with regards to setbacks end sewering. He stated the main Intent of the sewer project Is to help clean up Lake Minnetonka and wondered If the City couldn’t contribute more In light of this. Mayor Peterson closed the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. Jabbour asked If staff had looked Into using CDBG funds to help residents with lower Income with the project. Moorse explained that per Larry Blackstad, Coordinator of the funds, there was potential to use some of that money and stated he was to meet with Blackstad at the end of the week. Mayor Peterson clarified that the money cannot be used to apply towards the entire project. Jabbour asked If the contingency could be divided and assigned to specific areas, and If that area did not have any appeals, could be refunded to those residents. Qoetten stated that the money cannot be returned until the project Is completed. Butler clarified that those In agreement with the project are opposed to the Immediate hookup. She stated that deadline is set by the Co.incll but noted a date-certain would need to be established. She did not care when that date was as long as It was specified. Butler explained that when the project was bid, the cost was determined. She said, "you do not go to the grocery store and argue with the grocer over the price of a pound of butter . The same principal applies to the sewer project. Mayor Peterson and Jabbour agreed. Goetten said she agreed with the philosophy but did not want the osadllne date for connection to be extended to 20 years and stated that the owner would need to prove their septic system was working to continue use. Callahan felt that those in need of sewer should be required to connect immediately. He stated that staff should have the final decision on whether a system is functioning and can continue to be used. He noted that If a house Is sole, the owner should be required to connect to sewer. He felt that 3-5 years for mandatory hookup would be appropriate. 1 r MINUTES OF THE CONTINUATION OF THE STUBBS BAY ASSESSMENT HEARING HELD BY THE ORONO COUNCIL ON HELD MAY 18, 1992 Moorsa agreed that parameters need to be established and suggested staff draft criteria to determine if a system is functioning proper Iy. Qaffron noted that various conditions would need to be defined. He Indicated that failure would include systems discharging to the surface while non-conforming systems may be a system not discharging to the surface but too close to the water table based on soil borings. He stated that because of the new shoreiand regulations, the DNR and PCA are saying that if an existing system is too close to the water table, it is a non-conforming system and must be replaced within a year. Jabbour stated that he understood that the PCA is going to make a conscious effort to pursue enforcement. He stated that If the project had been done a couple years ago when the water table was lower the cost would have been much lower. He reminded the residents that because of the City’s good bond rating, the City Is able to get a bond at a lower rate. He felt that they have a moral obligation to continue with the project for the base area. He indicated he would like to go ahead with the project excluding Oxford Road and Cygnet Place. Goetten felt that the criteria should be evaluated for areas not to be Included. She asked if the trunk charge should be assessed to the two areas excluded. Jabbour asked If a now public hearing would be necessary to change the assessment roll to Include only a trunk charge to those areas. Barrett stated the Council has given notice of the project at certain dimensions. He stated that If reduced in scope or assessment, the Council would need to order a reduced project by resolution and that this assessment would be effective to pay for that reduced project. Butler suggested they decide on the time period for required hookup as that may help those opposed to the project decide If they wished to be included. She stated that the price cannot be changed as If more is assessed City-wide to all taxpayers, there will be many more In opposition to this project. She explained that the proposed assessment wiI I mean a $5.00 to $25.00 per yaar/per parcel for 15 year increase to all in Orono. Jabbour said he did not care if the property was required to hookup if sold. MINUTES OF THE CONTINUATION OF THE STUBBS BAY ASSESSMENT HEARING HELD BY THE ORONO COUNCIL ON HELD MAY 18, 1992 Callahan felt that It could easily happen that a future ner would be unaware of the required hookup charge. Barrett stated that Information would not have Iw be legally disclosed. He indicated that the only way to ensure the future owner was Informed would be to file a document against the chain of title, however on torrens prooerty that would be very difficult. He explained that future property owners would be subject to the City ordinances in effect at that time. Butler reviewed a memo by Gaffron entitled, "Extended period for sewer connect ion", whereby the foI Iowing conditions were suggested: 1. All failing systems shall connect to the sewer immediately upon the availability of the sewer. 2. All systems determined to be non-conforming, including those too near the water table and/or less than 75’ from the creek or lake and/or less than 50’ from a well shall connect to the sewer within 16 months of Its avallabiIity. 3. Any conforming functioning system constructed before 1/1/78 shall connect to the sewer witr.»' 16 months of Its availability. Such systems will hav^ m useful service life of 16 years or more. 4. Any conforming system constructed between 1/1/78 and 1/1/88 shall connect within 36 months of sewer availability or by 1/1/96, thus ensuring that such systems shall have had a useful service Iife of botween 8 and 17 years. 5. Any conforming system constructed after 1/1/88 shall connect within 60 months of the date of availability or by 1/1/98, thus allowing a minimum of 6 years and up to 10 years of useful service life for those systems. 6. Regardless of the above allowances, the sewer must be connected upon any sale of the property served with sewer. 7. All properties regardless of connection status, start paying the quarterly sewor charge at the end of the 16 month standard connection period. Ghaw asked if he has a double mound septic system, but is currently only using one of those, would he be allowed to switch to use the remaining one before required to hookup. 1 L MINUTES OF THE CONTINUATION OF THE STUBBS BAY ASSESSMENT HEARING HELD BY THE ORONO COUNCIL ON HELD MAY 18, 1992 PeMeo said he has a non-conforming system, but It will only cost a couple hundred dollars to bring it into conformance. He asked if that would fall under the 5 year hookup scenario. Gaffron stated that would have to be a policy decision whether or not the Council would allow updates to the current septic system to allow additional usage of that system. Jabbour felt that If the property doesn’t need sewer, the Issue should not be pushed. Mike McLaughlin. 180 Leaf Street, asked what selling his home had to do with the quality of the septic system. He said he has a largo lot and does not need the sewer. He explained that he built the house 5 years ago and was told at that time that sewer would not be available to that property. Bob Minkemna. 3200 Bavside Road, felt that the quarterly service charge to residents not hooked up Is ridiculous. Linda Whitman said that the life of a septic system is based In part on the usage of the residents and maintenance. She would prefer the Council establish a deadline for hookup when the system fails. Gaffron asked If properties using holding tanks would be required to hookup Immediately. Jabbour said they should be required to hookup right away. Mayor Peterson agreed. Gaffron said the reason for suggesting that properties be required to hookup upon a sale was because many parcels In this area are sold on a Contract for Deed which do not Involve a mortgage company. Knight asked what date is the deadline based upon. Butler informed him that it completion of the project. is taken from the date of final It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Butler, to determine that upon completion of the project, all parcels with a falling system shal I connect Immediately and all parcels determined to hove a non-conforming system Including a system too close to a creek or lake shall connect within 16 months, and all other parcels are MINUTES OF THE CONTINUATION OF THE STUBBS BAY ASSESSMENT HEARING HELD BY THE ORONO COUNCIL ON HELD MAY 18, 1992 required to connect to sewer within 60 months uni ess deemed to have a faiiing system prior to that date. Ayes 6, nays 0. Mayor Peterson said she has a hard time agreeing with Condition #7. Kuehn said the charge is a sewer avallabiIIty charge which is equal to the quarterly biI IIng, which has been estabiished by ordinance. Jabbour felt that amount should be established based on money needed for maintenance. Barrett reviewed that the Council was only making policy decisions on the project and would eventually need to amend the ordinances. He stated the availability charge may have fiscal consequences If deleted. Bob Provo. 220 Cygnet Place, asked If the $50.00 septic Inspection fee would still be charged. Mayor Peterson clarified that it would not be charged to parcels connected. 01 I le Peterson asked how many years they would be paying on the assessment. Mayor Peterson explained the assessment is set for 15 years at 8%. Moorse explained that If the City gets a better Interest rate, the cost of the project could be reduced. Mayor Peterson cal led for a recess from 8:30 p.m. to 8:65 p.m. Kniaht referred the Bederwood area residents to the Council for direct dialogue. He clarified that he was never critical of the Council offering to pay 30% of the project up front. He stated the group he represents Is willing to settle for an assessment of $10,500.00. He Informed members of his group that at some point they would need to decide whether or not they wished to appeal. He stated they have determined the fair amount for the assessment based upon the cost of a new septic system. Linda Whitman Informed the Council that the Bederwood group wished to be excluded from Mr. Knight's group, and they wished to be a part of the project. She expressed appreciation for the extension of time for hookup. She stated the Bederwood residents wished to retain their right to appeal. 8 as r MINUTES OF Th- CONTINUATION OF THE STUBBS BAY ASSESSMENT HEARING HELD BY THE ORONO COUNCIL ON HELD MAY 18, 1992 Jabbour said he did not understand now that It has been determined that the sewer needs to run down the street on Oxford Road, why the residents should be assessed more as they do not derive a greater benefit than other areas similar In appraised value to this area. Cook stated that the street replacement Is the major cost. He noted the failing system could have been served by running the line across private property. Jabbour asked how the City could perceive a greater benefit for properties on Oxford Road than on Bederwood where there are 2 acre lots also. Cook explained there is more street to replace on Oxford Road. Butler asked Cook If the Oxford Road portion of the trunk could be Installed adjacent to the road on an easement across the front yards. Cook explained that the equipment would still damage the road. He stated the homeowners would have to agree to a lesser road, which they have Indicated would not be acceptable. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Qoetten, to adopt the assessment roll for the Stupbs Bay Sewer Project for all properties excluding Cygnet Place, Oxford Road and Leaf Street. Ayes 5, nays 0. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt the remaining assessment roll for the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project for properties on Cygnet Place, Oxford Road and Leaf Street. Ayes 3, nays 2. Mayor Peterson and Butler voted nay. (Motion failed based on the requirement for a 4/5ths vote.) Callahan felt that the trunk charge should be assessed to properties not 100* included In the project, and It was indicated by those residents that they wish to be included ail or nothing. Butler explained she voted nay because at the last meeting Mr. Deterling reminded the Council of a petition with almost 100* opposition to the project. She felt they should be charged for the trunk charge and said that at some time in the future they may need to have service and would then have to pay the remainder. Mayor Peterson felt that Mr. Knight’s group should be allowed additional time to consider the project. hi MINUTES OF THE CONTINUATION OF THE STUBBS BAY ASSESSMENT HEARING HELD BY THE ORONO COUNCIL ON HELD MAY 18, 1992 Kniqht asked If the current trunk charge of $5,650.00 would also be reduced by the 30X proposed to be paid by the City. jabbour stated that the 30% was only offered for 100% part Icipat ion. Goetten reminded them that a future Council may choose not to discount the remaining amount. Callahan stated that If the trunk charge is assessed, that area would need to be made a part of a fulI project. He noted that the residents have the 30 day appeal time to further study the project. Jabbour explained that the Council has proceeded with Its best offer and would not reduce the assessment. He stated that It is expected to cost the City approximately $18,000.00 per house pe*- appeai. Goetten noted that the Council Is concerned about the health, safety and welfare of the residents and stated that If that Is the criteria for sewering an area, she hated to exclude anyone because of the cost. Jabbour suggested they order the project to begin, and If at the end of the 30 day appeal period It Is determined that there are too many appeals, drop that portion of the project. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to assess the trunk charge to the properties on Cygnet Place, Leaf Street and Oxford Road. Ayes 3, nays 2. Mayor Peterson and Goetten voted nay. Motion falled. Butler explained that when the trunk line is laid along Bayside Road, It will present Itself at the corner of Leaf Street and County Road 84, which will make it available for connection for the properties on Oxford Road, Leaf Street and Cygnet Place. She felt that because of that availability, the trunk charge should be assessed to those properties. Goetten felt that by doing such would be doing the citizens In that area a great disservice. Deterllna clarified that since the submittal of the petition expressing opposition, the cost has been reduced, the DNR has Imposed restrictive regulations, and many feel that sewer is InevI tab Ie. % * • MINUTES OF THE CONTINUATION OF THE STUBBS BAY ASSESSMENT HEARING HELD BY THE ORONO COUNCIL ON HELD MAY 18, 1992 Butler stated that Deter!ing reminded the Council at the last meeting of the petition. Gaffron clarified that Bayside East Includes Leaf Street up to the Luce Line. Cygnet Includes and the portion of Leaf north of the Luce Line. DeterlIng noted that since that meeting, many have had a change of heart. Cathy St. Lawrence. 253 Cygnet Place, said that since she signed the petition the situation has changed, and said they would like to be a part of the project. Brian Ehalt. 140 Leaf Street, asked If his wife’s name could be removed from the petition. He suggested City staff review each system on Cygnet Place and let people know how their system is doing. Gaffron said he would be happy to meet with the owners to discuss their system. CI eo Bioominodaie. 145 Cygnet Place, noted they had signed the petition but the situation has changed drastically since then ana have since decided they wish to be included with the project. She stated that the price of the service Is not equitable. Pat Crane noted at the last meeting a vast majority of those In attendance wanted sewer but objected to the price. He felt that the Council has gotten itself Into a box by expanding upon the base price and adding the lateral cost to additional areas. Jabbour explained that the assessment was based upon an appraisal o* what would hold in court. The appraisal was done on a neighborhood basis. Crane said his house is on the other side of Leaf Street. The other side of the street is being assessed $8,800 and he is being assessed $13,000. He felt this is unfair. He stated the entire area should have been assessed one unit price per household to be fair. Jabbour Indicated that there would be no n court to defend that type of assessment as the smalI house or Lake Street is not worth as much nor does It have as much potential as the homes on larger lots. rt MINUTES OF THE CONTINUATION OF THE STUBBS BAY ASSESSMENT HEARING HELD BY THE ORONO COUNCIL ON HELD MAY 18, 1992 MoorsA explained that they also charged areas costs specific to that area. It Mas inoved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution •3121 approving the entire assessment roll as proposed for the Stubbs Bay SeMer Project. Ayes 4, nays 1. Mayor Peterson voted nay. Motion passed. Barrett explained that owners may need to be renotifled to amend the roll at the end of the 30 day appeal period if determined that the roll will change. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Butler, to adjourn the Continuation of the Public Hearing for the Stubbs Bay Assessment at 9:45 p.m. Ayes 5, nays 0. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hal I in, City Clerk .«4 To:Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Fron: Dato:June 2, 1992 Jeanne A, Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administraljor Subject: 11679 William Miller, 2691 Casco Point Road - <r Variances - Resolution lonlg District: LR-IC, Single Family Lakeshore Residential, 1/2 acre, unsewered AcMplication: Request for hardcover variance to construct a 22' x 26* detached garage. Variance also required for structural repairs to existing gazebo/bathhouse structure located in 0—75' setback zone. Pertinent Ordinances 1.Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Summary of hardcover facts per revised survey submitted for current review. 0-75' setback area « 4,500 s.f. - c»\ Existing • 344 s«t« or 7.64% (origins! ostiniste 5.51} 75-250' setback area ■ 10,500 s.f. Existing - 4,554 s.f. or 43.28% (original estimate 37%) Proposed with amended plan * 3,438.95 s.f. or 32.75%* 250-500' setback area - 1,933 s.f. Existing - 104 s.f. or S.38% (original estimate 4.4%) 11,000 s.f.1.033 s.f. chimney « A.C. pad - 9 s.f. New driveway ■ 923.7 s.f. Existing driveway ■ 362.25 s.f. New garage ■ 572 s.f. Sidewalk “ 453 s.f. Stone wall ■ 53 s.f. Wood wall 22 s.f. Total - 3,438.95 s.f. or 32.75% Section 10.55, Subdivision 26 (B) - No structural alteration or addition to any non-conforming structure over the life of the structure shall exceed 50% of its value at the time of it becoming a non-conforming use, unless the structure is permanently changed to a conforming use cr unless alteration or addition would substantially reduce potential flood damages for the entire structure. Applicant had made structural improvements to the 8' x 8' gazebo/bathhouse structure consisting of replacement of foundation, beams, posts plus new siding and a door unit. r Zoning File #1679 June 2, 1992 Page 2 Status of Application Application #1679 involved an after-the-fact variance dealing with unauthorized structural improvements of a gazebo/bathhouse located within the 0-75' setback area of the property and a hardcover variance within the 75-250' setback area for the proposed construction of a 22' x ?6' detached garage to replace the existing 14' x 22' garage* At the September 16^ 1991 meeting of the Planning Commission, the application was divided into two parts* The Planning Commission voted to approve the variance (3 to 2, review Exhibit O) for the improvement of the gazebo/bathhouse structure and advised applicant the detached garage portion of the application would be tabled pending applicant's submittal of a revised plan that further reduces hardcover in the 75-250' setback zone* It was the desire of the Planning Commission to act on the after—the—fact/penalty portion of the application and allow for Council's immediate action* In turn it would allow applicant additional time to revise the portion of the improvements located in the 75-250' setback area seeking further reductions in hardcover. At the October 14, 1991 meeting of the Council (review Exhibit P), Council unanimously voted to table all action on the gazebo portion of the application until the Planning Commission had completed the review of the proposed garage improvement so that Council would be able to review the comprehensive improvement of the project and then determine the impact upon the ordinances. The applicant has submitted an updated survey and hardcover inventory by a surveyor with an amended plan for the City's consideration* The Planning Commission acted on the garage portion of the application at their May 18th meeting* Please review those minutes for detailed discussion and nendation*rec List of Bzhlblta A - Application B - Gaffron Memos 9/11/91/, 10/9/91 C - Plat Map D - Property Owners List E - Original Site Plan fc Applicant's Hardcover Facts F - 1968 Survey G - Oman Memo 9/12/91 H - Staff Sketch/Elevations I - Photos of Gazebo/Bathhouse Structure J-1-3 - Surveyor's Hardcover Facts M - Revised Site Plan N - Updated Survey 1/27/92 O - Planning Commission Minutes 9/16/91 P - Council Minutes 10/14/91 f Zoning File #1679 June 2t 1992 Page 3 Review of Application As for the unimproved repairs to the gazebo/bathhouse structure» please review Gaffron's memos of September and October 1991, Exhibit B. The applicant proposes construction of a 22* x 26* garage that meets all required setbacks, doors face street and an adequate area has been provided for turn around on-site. Applicant proposes removal of existing gravel drive areas and dog run to reduce hardcover from 43.28% to 32.75%. Please note by placing garage within existing graveled area, the new construction will have no impact on sloping topographies to the south as did the original proposal (review Exhibits E and P). Planning Coanission Rei i —w nilstii The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the 22' X 26' garage as proposed by applicant based on the finding that applicant proposes removal of hardcover totaling 1,105.05 s.f. or 10.53% and that the revised proposal minimizes impact on existing steeper topographies to south side of property. Options of Action 1. Approval as proposed. OR 2. Approval as amended. 3. Denial, 4.Other. Any coriition of approval must classify structure within 0- 75' setback area as a non-conforming structure and subject to all pertinent ordinances. If gazebo/bathhouse structure is to be altered in any way, please specify deadline for required improvemc nt. Council Action To provide staff with conceptual direction so that an appropriate resolution can be drafted for review and action at the Council's meeting of June 22, 1992. Isv tmtim d r ft Ilfo'? CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATK Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50e00 per each aiditional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) #1 w ‘.y rn PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ClTt DF iJRl ------------------------ / (MCK csni/s Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name (L*>1 Phone /home) ^7/ — Phone (work) :l^9/ /T'city: - - - Zip: (niflER (if different than applicant) Name ' _________ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired ___ I (do) ^do^^n^) also own the adjacent parcels of land (month/year) i PRESENT OSE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property ^ ^.JResidenti al Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: Estimated Construction Cost 9 V * ^ 3 y O qaJ_ ViWIMKBS MQOIXBD Lot Area Lot Width FrontSetback Variances ( other * TMT MiuSf '*^0 -^5 Au/t-o ou.r ' r #-A /» r' f f ^1 * 9 • A »/ 7^ BARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting frc^ strict enforcement of zoning regulation^^^ir DBSCRIPTIOH of DWJSOAL property conditions /i t>enAt9M7^/i^ ✓ Describe unusual prooerty conditions preventing compliance with Zoning rnrf. Raouirements: /f - -- - - - - - - - - - - 2. 3. 4. 5. S. 7. BBQOIRED StJBMITTALS 1, Completed Application Form*^ Certified Property Owners List of - ne.s within 150' (you must obtrin this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Cenrer 348-3271). . Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%"xll'' for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes/ in existing grade are proposed (provide one cop" 8J5"xll"). ^ Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%"xll"). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate any other persons you wish notified of this application. ^ 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. PlMse remember that vour variance application is not_coeglete—if—the—*°9,y.S. litFormetion has not been included. MB mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mmm wm mm es» mm mm mm mm mm m^mm^m APPLICANT'S SIGNATORB • j The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (st/ff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses Incurred in review of this application^,.-aad certifies that the information true and correct t*? the best ox h^^/her knowledge. Z6f' ^ Data ^ supplied is Applicant's 3ig44dcure T OHRRS SIGNATURE agents# CommisA^on members, and Council^jlicobers for purposes of investiga tlon and verification cf this request. \ Owner's Signature 4/^ - - - Date jipliclK7muf7hlvV7l^^^ intt the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings ^ third Monday of each month. Applicants most be present at all review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is Office of this change prior to the meeting. , ip Tot Chairman Kelley and Plannin<j Commission Me.nbers Ron Moorse, C.'ty Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Adminisi.rv.tor Dates September Hr 1991 Subjects #1679 William Miller, 2691 Casco Point Road - Variance - Public Hearing lofilag Districts LR**1C, Single far..ily lakeshore residential, 1/2 acre, unsewered Applications Request for hardcover variance to construct a new 20' X 34' garage. Variance for structural maintenance of existing "bathhouse" in 0-75' zone. Pertinent Code Sections 1.Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 limits hardcover in the 0-75* and 75-250' zones. 2.Section 10.55, Subdivision 26 (B) states: "No structural alteration or addition to any non-conforming structure over the life of the structure shall exceed 50% of its value at the time of its becoming a non-conforming use, unless the structure is permanently changed to a conforming use or unless the alteration or addition would substantially reduce potential flood damages for the entire structure." List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Application Plat Map Prop«-»rty Owners List Hard* hip Statement Survey Site Plan/Hardcover Calculations, Existing Site Plan/Hardcover Calculations, Proposed Garage Construction Plan Staff Sketches of Gazebo Inspector's Notes 0^ Pertinent Pacts 1.The existing follows: and proposed hardcover is summarized aS r i 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' Existing 5.5% 37.0% 4.4% Proposed 575% 30.2% 4.4% Allowed51 I ,, 25% 30% 2.Applicant proposes to remove existing 14* x 22* garage and r«avert that area to grass. Construction of a new 20' x 36* garage will be over existing gravel driveway area. A 156 s.f. portion ol the gravel area will also be removed. i: Zoning File #1679 September 11r 1991 Page 2 of 3 3.The applicant had applied for a garage construction permit in mid*^August. When the Building Inspectors visited this site as part of their hardcover review, they found major work being done on the "bathhouse". While applicant states that the work was merely replacement of siding, the Building Inspectors found that virtually all structural members and the foundation were in the process of being replaced. The second story gazebo structure was supported by 4 new posts on top of new footings, and these posts were open rather than enclosed. The applicant was advised by the Building Inspectors and the Zoning staff that this work could not continue and that a variance would be needed to do anything other than replacement of siding, but that the work the Building Inspectors found far exceeded that cosmetic work. Three weeks later. Inspector Lyle Oman found that the structure had been completely enclosed with no approval to do so. i Dlscnssion Given the requirements of Section 10.55, Subdivision 26 (B), stwff feels that this work was in direct violation of the letter and intent of that section in that virtually every structural aspect of this 8’ x 8' building (i.e. replacement of foundation, beams, posts plus new siding and a door unit) constitute a structural alteration certainly in excess of 50% of the original value of the structure. The Assessor's records do not acknowledge the existence of this 8* X 8' structure aI«''.ough it shows up on the 1968 survey, hence it likely waa never assumed by the Assessor to have a significant value. In the past City staff’s position on structures such as this has been that mere cosmetic repairs such as re-siding or re-roofing have been permitted only to the extent that such work does not include repair to structural members (i.e. one can re-side or re-roof, but replacement of posts, foundations, joists or roof boards requires variance approval for continuing a non-conforming structure in the 0-75* zone). This interpretation evolved because Section 10.55, Subdivision 26 relies on having baseline valuation data which is often not available for this type of lakeshore structure. In the past, the City has in virtually identical situations, required the removal of such structures as they deteriorated. Given the total replacement of the first floor of the structure in question, staff feels that there is no question that the current work far exceeds the 50% allowance for structural maintenance based on a 1975 value. (1975 is the date in which the current Code containing a 75' setback requirement for principal and accessory structures, ¥^35 adopted. In fact, a 75* setback ordinance was first adopted in October of 1973.) t Zoning File 11679 September 11> 1991 Page 3 of 3 e Issues to Consider 1.Does the removal of an existing one~stall garage and a portion of gravel driveway* resulting in a net decrease in hardcover from 37% to 30.2% in the 75-250* rone* justify granting of a hardcover variance for construction of the garage? 2.Are there any additional areas of hardcover that could be removed to reasonably further reduce the hardcover percentage? 3.Given the clear intent of Section 10.55* Suocivlsion 26 (B) that non-confdrming structures in the 0-75* zone should eventually disappear* is there any justification to (after- the-fact) grant a variance for virtual replacement of this 8* X 8* bathhouse/gazebo structure? Options for Werf—endsti* 1. 2. 3. 4. lav Approval as proposed. Partial approval* specifying conditions or limitations. Denial. Other. A C 'fcjr f w -C? -'f c , /V'- ; 'k' r <2 0'“''' t-r f. >c X it < V / ' fc*1 It rj. c •0 flfeli 4 //■".VTo:Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorser City Administrator Proa: Dates Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator October 9, 1991 Subjects #1679 William Miller, 2691 Casco Point Road > Variance - Partial Review Zoning District: LR-IB, Single family lakeshore residential, 1/2 acre, sewered Application: Request for variances for structural maint<?nance of existing gazebo/bathhouse in 0-75' zone. List of Exhibits A B C D Planning Commission Action Notice 9/17/91 Planning Commission Minutes 9/16/91 Building Inspector's Photos Memo 6 Exhibits of 9/11/91 Mote:Application #1679 also includes a hardcover variance request in the 75-250' zone for construction of a detached garage. That portion of the application was tabled by Planning Commseion at their September 16, meeting. Planning Commission indicated they would prefer that this application be reviewed as two separate items, and indicated to applicant that the gazebo/bathhouse issue would be sent on for Council action. Discussion Please review the memo and exhibits of September 11. Briefly, the Building Inspection staff found a gazebo/bathhouse being reconstructed in the 0-75* zone while they were reviewing the garage building permit application. Applicant was advised to stop construction on the gazebo/bathhouse. He continued that construction to ctxnpletion without benefit of City approval or a building permit. The discussion section in Page 2 of the September 11 memo details staff's interpretation of thii constructlOii and the issues involved. PlaimiBg Ccmmissioo Rerr—endatii Planning Commission voted 3 in favor, 2 against a motion to approve an after-the-fact variance and building permit for the gazebo/bathhouse as constructed. The Planning Commission minutes are attached for Council review. Zoning File #1679 October 9, 1991 Page 2 O(d Staff Rerr—finilati* Staff has not drafted a resolution because of the split Planning Commission recommendation. Council may wish to consider the following options: 1.Grant conceptual approval majority recommendation, resolution. per Planning Commission direct staff to draft 2. I Table for concurrent review with garage request once Planning Commission recommendation is received. 3.Conceptually deny, direct staff to draft a resolution for denial (please specify findings for denial). 4. Other. Isv iiiminifiifili irmmtar.i iiSlilll I nriJitj •V'r • “ •%'*’ . . vr • • • *f • - y^ir !•' ' :?**‘*f \ ^ i? £' t;:A :>• *# - •' ^^ » • • • r - . • .* ‘^X 0 •,‘•5' >t*’»^%' ‘••Ti VV♦»*v*. •* C' * ''•* V *' * - ^ * ^ *•' * . I \». '• *.\ ' •, ■'» • i‘ •'' d . - \ ^ ^ .^5^ / ' / . ,:;< .*• '/r ■**^*•1' ••*'•’• * •/ *|;-..;..;-;W i• Vl» : „• • ; i pi.i'S: *••. ........................^ % ^ 0 Ji; RUN DAT! •;^;i|mtch DOS '■\>aMOR ADOR OCARSiii i' to*ii7-n n 0001CASCO ROXNT ROONNCR NANI ,< OCVERLY SNIRLXNO TA)(PAYER )HicvtRLV SMERLINONAHC/AOM KtSSt N LAKi OF ISLES WCNY r MPLS HN ^..V ... ...*SMOS V. SO tO-lX7>CS ts 0004 PROP ADOR 0E497 ^CASCO POINT RO ';H-^ OItCR NAME .--I A 0 C KANE .‘■.i 1»TA)<PAYER ',< A LANRENCE KANE ;«t497 CASCO POINT RO NAYIATA MN BBS91 viirta'-^ to-117-Ei ts.oou wST PROP AOOR ^ OEMS CASCO POINT RO OMCR NAME ^.OEMCTT C TAXPAYER NAME/Atr fY A WFE OEMNETT C OOMOEYI A-. M4S CASCO POXNr SO ^ MvzAU m ^.s5sn . . . *'Vvt>10 10-117-ES> so E0-117-ES 14 OOOS . t • CASCO POINT ROPROP AOOR 01404 OWCR NAME iHTNEOOORE C OANHS TAXPAYER <&OAVXO RUN(LE -NAME/A00R M14O4 CASCO PT RO SO ^ v ;:SnAYEATA m\: Win 'f „mmn mames^'j,.,.. TAXPAYER ,tM TOTAL' OATtN HEHNEPXN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OMNERS LISTSO 10-117>2S 23 0002 02491 CASCO POINT RO NILLIAH F MILLER NILLIAM F MILLER 2491 CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA MN SSS91 38 10-117-23 2S 0005 02715 CASCO POINT RO T A 0 ERHIN TERRY A A DOROTHY L ERNIN 2715 CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA MN 5SS91 58 10-117-23 24 0001 02404 CASCO POINT RO THEODORE C DANHS DAVIO RUNKLE 1484 CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA m 55391 008 00011 'C'A* . • h A -i ... S8 20-117-23 24 0021 02710 CASCO POINT RO C H A 0 J PALMER CURnS H A BARBARA J PALMER 2710 CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA MN 55391 ' ' I ■ «r . •* . ■; ••' V ■ r ‘ > 'i 'i • I REPORT NO. PI4S5401 PAGE 3538 20-117-23 23 0003 02495 CASCO POINT RO 0 A P LEE PATRICIA R LEE 2495 CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA m 65391 38 20-117-23 23 0020 02477 CASCO POINT RO TYRONE A BUCEY A NILA BUCEY TYRONE A A MILA BUCEY 2477 CASCO PT RO NAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 14 0002 02440 CASCO POINT RO V A 0 BULLER • VERNON J BULLER 1440 CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA Itl 55391 38 20-117-23 14 0021 02700 CASCO POINT RO i» P BUESIN8 SLR RltMINB , . c DANIEL BUESINB/LINOA RUMIINB ' 2700 CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA m 55391 ,i • ^ Hi* Ij If * ; M V d ■■ * • • • • ■ J. *■ *». i t •■ -.r4 ■ ^k'4Y«d - '■'■ 'iJf ’’1* i.i f-'l*-"’h • ‘ f 'R. i .i-i f-‘ JL A * • I • i i ^♦ A y 4^ A ■ ■ ^ 1 i# • 5'.f • ♦ ; * . ’ 4. ■ r* ^ • , • C U.Z. >4T/c>^ / / a/(^ // /^S /3)44/A7^ r -^41c:^S/Vo/^^r # 1 ^-A. '-i') 4 <■< - / '■1. ■ •;'■, ^ ■. s ■ > .> ti 1 Vii!% V ■ 1 .‘v'•1 , w • ' •.- i . ^ . 4 ‘ a. . k ' ■.4 . 7c>'^‘^^ ^LoT" S. c?-7i"=^(^7jr;r4o0 = y^oojs' ■JS’-^ro^^CnAicO « .os-oo^ s(/OiCco') = 4 0d? ^ - ( i>0 i- =■ 7 7 yo4> ^ ^r'Ay) j O i 4¥1 ^ = yx a.y9 7r-.Vcb^f />r/D C*^*^^*y ^ /y t( /1r^>-<6c>r - 7o ^ - ^ =r 3o» c 3fc/x ^ ( ' •* "a ✓-». c= 7»"7A. ^ - //i. C*o>sk S-7*) aXo g /M^'O bKtOcdyy </0,S'^/t>) /or’ ^ ^7^/ eX'S p>k/^/m^con^ VA ^VJB" ^^^j:>coJ<^^ *y, <:AfjL4Z44^^7%^^m C ^K*STiJCr -^X 4iu.*4. T" ) ....................... ............ J^-7^' -J4 yj r yrfto » sr,X^* 7-^"--LSo <_lfH> := 37 _**ro /©r-f *^roo ?>. '^v;; ..... •■» • V % ■ ''t v« •!»/';■ ^:':; mk t-■;v?;;-.j^>Sl>4*; . • V ’ '. V * ]U * • i\ ■■ W^v' «:-■..•'.'V'“''^-r’l‘ *'v, : ; v^-'' X'V4e i ^ '%J“' ■ &:■ iV * • * V-- ? \ * ■ V i»\' . 'fMl.wt ' < Jf\' / ■»• V". %* • 5? PRCPSTTY O?.I. 1- VBt» i 1. ~j« ?9l3t. 3erlat ?ar!e. '.ttan—ot« .................... 'V, ^ • 7ia» Cr^no- 1t<« lad Lak> Mlanatonk»» >pd bttw tva .^fliithagly llaa ot Lot 12A ia Spring ?•»*» «ad AlJtiit 7««p« stlT«l7 30*3 f9m% and 90.3 f3«t. llao 'ACNm m I«t 2* iaditor* Sabdl^lJl^ 30* 265. 2«a«pla Cooatr t t 4« •• ) . OBTIPICATS or LOCATION Of BUIUJINO I hrnmar emnltr ttei #«_-*?5C^L-i3------It-M 1 rsaB* • iorw ml }9ml0m»Un $H00m Jmcnlrni pfpmrtf t4 J---------* “ b«lUtac<al A twtmUr t'l. JCMM i. T?**!. no^vCYCW. MO.44** /•’^t/0' \ TO PILE: FROM: DATE: RE: 8/14/91 8/20/91 8/21/91 9/11/91 M G 2691 Casco Point Road Lyle Oman# Building Official September 12# 1991 Work after a Stop Work Order Received permit application Bruce Vang and I visited site to review hardcover calculations. Found carpenters working on gazebo on lakeshore. New foundation ahd 4 new corner suppor posts were installed. The garage slab forms were in place. We explained to the carpenters that they were in violation of City ordinances and the building code because they were working within 75' of the lane without a building permit. A stop work order was posted and they were informed they were to stop work on the gazebo and the garage. The homeo ler Bill Miller came thing in tne morining. I spoke to hiir. about the for variances to continue work on the gazebo ana hardcover problems relating to the garage. I soon brought Jeanne Mabusth and Michael Gaffron into t e conversation# and it was made very clear to M^r. Miller that variances would be reguired to work on the gaze o. Michael "affron requested photo's ci the gazebo. I arrived on site# I found the lower section o^^^® gazebo had been completed# stud walls# siding and a door had been installed. --------------- • • .• •, . . • • ' ■ " • t ^»____r '*'* ^ i- S ' ••* . ••.**••• • . . • m* • 2^ , *-•<-••• »* • • . • • • ^ .-•■•••• • • • • • •• • ^ • ■ 0 y #• • •• ^ 00t^—f 0 1* *'^.* jegt z 'm /^* TT- h* I.V/^vO pgjD»^ U^€ •1. 7^1 / , / 0 / / X-7 ✓ / ^ f — i VV/// 0 < 1 L 11 k /0 0 0 •t—»” -5fkti«X r----^ T *•*'1-'Ml III 11 \ •'■ f ' 'Mi li!I/I- ^^.000 ^ ^ 4- / t ♦ -• 0* »« . «■ « M 2AJHBH' JMRWLy’ ; ». •« ij ^ ^ ^ »-%«^ ■♦' •* -, y* . •• • ■ * ^.-‘t'-:'-. -■*•1 »^> i?r 1^ -*1.' • ; * *rr* —r*'^ »■•; Vjnl,' Jk\ r - It -^’5 v> •* ■M3:? r T^*L '' A ^ ^ ^ __a______I___:_______iLidKliMiBili M- ■ « •».e/ic /'i/ci£/i HARDCOy;a.CALCULATlQ!l HORK.SKEET S6T3ACK ZO.'IE: (CIRCLE ome) 0-75' (75^250^ 250-500' E'<istimg Hardcover »ri Zone 500-10GO' A. ' House LENGTH chfmttC'f ____/» S 9 * • • • M • m C. Dr IVE'NAY AC’/Lof/ •9 ^ $\ liL % D,. SfUEWALK • ^ E. Haw / 3 .. • ^ • • F. Lam0siCAPe A(7 C A <AREAS UNDERLAIN byTT , PI^^TIC SHEETING 5ra9ie. urtnits*' • • ••#<»•74^ ^3 X B/roen^ 34 ’.3' X B. Garage 3ZJ . _ _ x X X X Z(,,4 V/IDTH X _____^ J4-J 14-J ^ >o Zo 0.7 0.*7 Total Hardcover in Zone « Total Property Area in Zone '/033 S.F. Si'o' 5/2.' S.F. S.F. S.F. ^ Pw • r • .F. ^‘=>70 ^ S.F. Jit S.F. 557 -72.S.F. ^^7 S.F. 6c»_ S.F. • 5Z 55 22. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. Z- /£* ' f ? ^ r-L? J// ^ 5 S.F. -v.| 45.^ S.F. (T id. Z>OCf S.F. r&l rri • '¥3^4- ^ [~F] /^3ocf X 100 t •• • • • •- 9^ (F^ • • • « ’M • *1 • k • • •iARDCOVca .CALCULATIOJl WORKSHtET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE’ ONE) 0-75' 75-250' E xisting Hardcover in Zone 400-500') 50Q-10CC' • ^ ^ A . r uu^id . _ _ A LENGTH WIDTH • •• • X • • » • • a * a 1 r • S.F. X • • • S.F.••••••, ••X••a • S.F. • X • a S.F. •v • • n. Garage v x • a • S.F. <• -f t% • c. D riveway . .x ‘ 7 • 104.S.F. t ■ .. X m • S.F.' •• • D. Sidewalk .*_____ . x • • •• S.F. ••• *• .• . * • .• - ■ _______X »* S.F. « X _____ • a S.F. E. ’a TIO/ . • .. . D eck ’ .... • X •• ••S.F.••. •• p.Undscape _ X • • • S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN nv . X ■ - •• • . S.F. PLASTIC • • • SHEETING X .S i Fi » *§•«•#•• • * a « S.F. • a. Other ‘ x •, S.F. • % Total Hardcover in Zone f..*. • Total Property A rea in Zone /-?33 f.F. • m I64- ■^[T] I'm. w *. • __n ICQ - •• • • . • •• • . .. •«»«•« •• TT- a & % ■■'.T""" . I * I .,4 #' • V J t ', V, < ’JV*. • 1 %* t >• ■ •:U • .’I 1. ' •• *: • • (• • V .., •I':;;: V.:V'* t* •’ f t-;*»•\ • •« V’.; y* ■■• f.-r vv- vv*y u,.' * .-• % t • *.'V . t A.' • • I** S' * ♦ . f' * ■ • *^.v , i,} »* .i V •V:* I ^ • • «■- ; -.i < V' I I ‘f,'V ■; Y .*•-:- r*j \»v '•-■vv, I • . ••. \- i ' 'V t;..‘{ 'v ’ s ' l t. - •■. . • » »■ •. 1 ) vt# • * \ I/ • V*‘ v'* • .>vf-».:a V< «> •St' >' ;/:-K ‘i i/ • » \ ".w /( / «.* »• )!.iv M,• ‘,*w ■ •a > •| '' rS f ’i t • # • • * a V; • * t t, « It*' f •i! . f . . '0t .f m * f;:» ‘ ..• . V*-’; / » J. ... V .* .¥ ,,« 1 f. '« ’ ‘ f . i-: • *. • •it .1 ^ V.’ '» : ‘‘V :- '■ ^ •• • p • ’.- ..« ♦• .•i-: : ’ • ■ * ■*..' • . * r»* .tf. 1 •.• % I ;:-V *•* * m * v.‘ ■ ■> '.•ffC • •• . \ I t ^ fi / ‘ •. < fV^v- -■ f-*-; ■■'■•:. ■ . t % i • • • •; '*! % '• -.’... •V/ *.V .f. ,• } f > •• y S , / ♦. ..f »» ♦* l 4 "f '•Y \ •. « »• ‘ •% ' 1 >.• ». * ( ;'■« 1 ! •. >• f ^ ■r • » t » • ) . 'i . ‘ X.• aabcovtiR 'Ho ^ *• *•..•r :• H: ' • * f • ? ir k • R>D Co b Uq MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - SEPTEMBER 16, (#9) #1679 WILLIAM F. MILLER 2691 CASCO POINT ROAD VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING o 9:15 - 9:30 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. William Miller was present for this application. Gaffron briefly reviewed that the applicant Is proposing to remove an existing single car garage and a portion of the parking area, and Install a larger garage with side opening doors. He noted that the second part of this application ‘ Involves structural maintenance of an existing 8'x8* bathhouse. He explained that the building Inspectors were on the site to >'®v1ew the garage proposal and noticed the work being done on the bath— housb. They noted that the entire lower level had been -removed apart and new posts were Installed In the corners and a new slab was Installed or at least new footings. The applicant was told to stop work on the project, but he continued to finish the project regardless. Gaffron noted that the code states that a non-conforming structure within the 0-75* zone cannot be Improved more than 50% of Its value. It was the ® contention that the Improvements exceeded the 50% or the valuation. Johnson asked If the platform and stairs are new. Miller stated that they pre—date his ownership and that he has recently washed and stained them so they may look newer than they really are. Ho noted that since ho Is a now owner, he was unaware of the restrictions on the bathhouse. He-also noted_that he has expended $359 for the repairs to the boathouse «nd did not feel that it exceeded 50% of the value. 'He explained that the inspector told the contractor to stop work on all structural work. HO noted that at that time the siding was not on but all other work was done and because of high winds, he went ahead and put the siding on to prevent collapse of the entire He also felt that putting the siding on did not constitute structural work. Cohen asked 1f the hardcover could be further reduced. Miller instructed that the patio could be taken out by the back door which results In 70 s.f., and ho could take out a.l the sidewalks from the house to the garage and put In stepping stones ^whlch would result In reduction of 56 s. f ..iHe .noted ® matter of practicality, as If stepping stones are Installed, you cannot shovel snow. Rowlette asked about the dog run. Hiller noted that It was not added In the calculation because It has a dirt floor. 12 4 m « . •> f MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - SEPTEMBER 16, 1991 lONXNQ FILE #1679 - CONT. Gaffron reported that the proposed garage leaves about a 3* urea of the existing gravel parking area behind the garage whi.n will not be able to be used as parking In the It has bean driven on before and It may be compacted and there fore has been classified as hardcover. Rowlette asked what normal two-car garage dimensions are. Gaffroii noted that It Is about 20 x24 . M111,r oxp1a1n9d that tha normal anu ho is proposing a three car garage with a 20 depth. He Tolt that It Is nacossary to have a three car garage for storage of cars, boats, et:.. Ho also stated that the cost factor would not Justify building a two-car garage. Schrojdor felt that the garage Is too largo concurred. Mcos also M111.P fait that ho has reduced the hardcover down as as possible. Ho also noted the other variances which approved with oxcosses of hardcovor. much were Schroeder responded that each application Is different «1th different merit c • Johnson felt there Is a large amount of hardcover on the property and felt that the hardcover should be reduced. Miller explained that If It Is tabled or aaraae Is not built, then the hardcover stays at 37%, opposed to the 30% proposed. With respect to the bathhouse, out that^only the bottom half of the structure was replaced. Johnson asked about the new slab. Miller stressed that only the foundation for the posts on the lake side were replaced. Rowlette concurred that If the deck/stairway/bathhouse Is alone. - - Gaffron advised that they could. was moved by Cohen, seconded byMoos, to recomaend approval of tho structural maintenance of the bathhouse nays 2. Ayes 3, Johnson voted noy b.csuse ho felt It was basically replacid and Schroeder concurred with that fealing. ^ IV>t. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - SEPTEMBER 16. 199i ZONING FILE #1679 - CONT. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Moos, to table application #1679 William Miller of 2691 Casco Point Road, to allow applicant time to redesign his proposal to reduce the hardcover percentage. Ayes 5, nays 0. Cohen noted that the bathhouse Issue will go directly to the Council for review at their October 14 meeting. (#10) #1682 CHRISTINE BRICKLEY 3262 NORTH SHORE DRIVE VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING 9:30 - 10:00 P.M. noted. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was Christine Brickley was present for this application. Brickley noted that the pre-existing hardcover shown on the sketch Included Is shown at 20'x24‘, which really should be 20*x31' because the garage was back further. Gaffron noted that there are not accurate records of where the garage actually was. He noted that the property Is located between the marinas on North Shore Drive and this Is a lakeshore property. He explained that there are a number of variances being requested. Applicant Is replacing a number of accessory structures used for storage with one large garage. Ho noted the Inspector came upon the site when the slab was half poured and a stop work order was Issued, but because concrete was on the way and could not be cancelled, he allowed the owner to proceed the knowledge that It was at her own *• risk and may 'not be approved. The garage has a footprint of'1,056 s.f. where the largest accessory building that could be put on a lot of size Is 1,000 s.f. A garage over 1,000 s.f. would require 30 setbacks from all lot lines. This garage Is poured at about 2-3 setbacks. With a footprint of 730-1000' s.f., a 15 setback would still be required, and anything smaller would require 10 setbacks. In tho 75-250* zone, pre-existing hardcover Is at 46.5%. In the 0-73' zone, hardcover Is at 15.6%. Lot coverage Is proposed at 19.8%. He told the Commission that they must determine what size garage Is appropriate and where should It be located. Donald Stauffer, 3268 North Shore Drive, concurred that the ‘garage is Important to free’the shared drive of parked cars. Brickley noted that four properties share the drive Cohen felt that the application should be tabled to 9^ve the applicant time to redraw the plans. He noted that a footprint 0 more than 1,000 s.f. cannot be allowed. Rowlette agreed. • t y I. minutes of the REQULAR ORONO council MIITXNO - 0CT08IH IA| l§§i (#5) #1629 DUNCAN MACMILLAN 1700 FOX STREET VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3026 Jim McNulty was present to represent the applicant. Moorse explained this Is a request to construct an open carport in lieu of the previously approved garage. Jabbour stressed that after the Council granted pro^ct, Mr. MacMillan vowed that was the last request ho would have concerning this property. McNultv explained that the project went overbudget and the owners realized they would prefer a carport to meet their needs. Mayor Peterson asked how we would handle the situation when In a year they come back and want the garage. Gaffron noted that the resolution addresses this potential. concerns. Gaffron noted there were no other concerns. Jabbour ask.d If covenants -ere ever ftled In the chain of title restricting further developmeht of the property. Gaffr confirmed they had been filed. It was moved by Jabbour. seconded by Goetten, to adopt llrXl for aoDllcatlon #1629 for W.D. MacMillan of 1700 Fox Street, to revise their previous variance 1°. ‘^navs^O*^an open carport In lieu of the approved garage. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#6) #1679 WILLIAM MILLER 26S1 CASCO POINT ROAD VARIANCE - PARTIAL REVIEW William Miller was present for this application. SUintIniJJ. S? In Listing g.z.bo/bathhous. in the 0-75’ zone. P r C:t 0 • c MINUTIS or THI MUULAH ORONO COUNCIL MEBTINa - OCTOBM 14, 1891 #1679 - CONT. 8-haf Mt the Planning Commission meeting, Jabbour Sot.r that iifVz ”so P„.st.d »t th. time Of fnin, tha ppp’^pp^^- fo? ?he 1o5?Ld ?o SlloS tS; Applicant time to submit revised plans. , wi. nrm8>AH thAit thev choose to separate the application . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . a. ^ 4.U.4. ««« <«ciia is tho structure cannot be improved mo?e°than"5Q% of the 1975 valuation, which must be determined. Gaffron stated that this structure was never valued r0cord#d by th® asssssor. or even ^ k%8 Pal seconded by Goetten# to teble ippl1catlSr%1679 variancr°reqiest maln?e^in« tS'^rexIstlng bathhouse/gazebo. Ayes 4. nays 0. Miller noted he has a problem with tabling the ''non? t^Voi: onapplication right ,a ^^qp. He noted that he has Planning Commission. He the the no the Mabusth noted that to data revised plans have not been received by staff. ^ Mayor Peterson noted that If the "P'JS^^pHy *?« i5:?n’;^r.??r??o::iiy'’n ^d an after-tn.- ?Srb2cause -Irk .as continued after notification. Miller explained that the "*P„JPj,°2use*of htgh*ilnds.order but only for preservation reasons because or « valuation of the structure. Goett.n understood that normal maintenance h.s.l..^ allowed by Council, such as painting, but footings an. structural. Mayor Peterson noted It 1. Orono's hop. »» *”these non-conforming structures through this proces . P i > ijmie minutes or THE REOULAR ORtlNO COUNCIL MIITINO - OCTOBER 14. 1B91 jiSbL; askli 1f th. back Of the bathhouse is the retaining -all. Miller concurred it is. He stated that Here installed and felt this did not exceed 50* of the value the entire structure should be considered as a ehole. Goetten asked who makes the determination on the 50%. Jabbour noted the Council is responsible for making that determination. Callahan felt the enclosure should be treated as a new structure. Mlller noted the structure was enclosed prior to the ?iir«ements. He explained he is a l«?ngand was unaware of the rules. Ha would not have risked losing the bathhouse. Barrett warned that If the non-conforming structure J*®®" dSwJmlneS ?o be in a deteriorated state, it would have to he removed. Jabbour asked if this -ere determined if the entire structure would have to be removed or just the bathhouse. Barrett Indicated whatever portion the Council deemed appropriate. Miller noted ha plans to attend future Planning Commission miiungs to seS hoE they handle other similar situations as he felt he was treated unfairly. Moos noted she did not feel he was treated unfairly or unjustly by the Planning Commission. Goetten advised that each applIcatlon Is looked at individually by the commission as each has different circumstances. (#7) #1604 DAVID A ANNE GRAHAM 2745 SHADYWOOD ROAD ................................. Hoo... ...I.In., th.. .hhi.e.t.oh .nv.iv.. il'J Installation of a two ti.r.d dack r.pi.ein, an existing patio/deck area. of .n^.l.tin, patio ar.a and "2 replacing It with a t-o story deck. trellis and three-season porch and patio shall be replace natural ground cover restored resulting In no ardcover. ( Tqs Pros I Dates Subject s Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator ^/. V/v Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrate^^ ^ April 14, 1992 #1724 Tammy L, Woodis, 2818 Casco Point Road - Conditioi^jk Use Permit/Variance - Public Hearing ^ m Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.03, Subdivision 10 - A conditional use permit is required for in ground pool/patio to be located on a through lot in a residential district. Section 10.71 Subdivision 4 (A) - Setback front and rear required for accessory structures on through lots. Required = 30’ Proposed front ■ 108' Proposed rear ■ 194' Ordinance requirements are satisfied. Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Lot coverage. Total lot area - 24,700 s.f. Lot coverage - 3,705 s.f. or 15% Proposed ■ 3,592.7 s.f. or 14.5% (Review Exhibit G) Ordinance requirements are satisfied. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover variance within the 250-5QQ* setback area. Total area ■ 17,800 s.f. Allowed - 5,340 s.f. or 30% Proposed ■ 5,552 s.f. or 31% Variance • 212 s.f. or 1% 500-1,000' area - 0,900 s.f. Allowed » 2*415 s.f. or 35% Existing - 0 Proposed • 0 Total lot area • 24,700 s.f. A1lowed 7,410 s.f. • 30% of the total lot area Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (E) - Accessory structures in excess of 750 s.f. footprint area but not exceeding 1,000 s.f. Footprint area shall be located at least 15' frosi any lot line. Pool basin M#ts required 15* setback from all side and rear lot lines. Zoning Memo #1724 April 14, 1992 Page 2 List of Exhibits A - Application • B - Applicant's Addendum C - Property Owners List D - Plat Map E ~ Legal Combination P - Hardcover Facts G - staff's Inventory of Hardcover and Lot Coverage Information H ~ Staff's Sketch Description of Request Applicant seeks approval of a conditional use permit for the installation of a pool to the ^orth or rear of the residence on a through lot. As already notedr a conditional use perniit is required for all accessory structures on through lots. It was the original intent of the applicant to legally combine the parcels so that a variance would not be required. Upon review of the hardcover facts, it was determined that a hardcover variance within the 250-500' setback area at 1% would be needed to approve the proposal as presented. Applicant may be advised to reduce 212 s.f. of hardcover or members may be asked to consider the remaining portions of the property within the 500-1,000' setback area. 6,900 s.f. does not contain any hardcover improvements. With total lot area at 24,700 s.f., applicant would be allowed a total of 7,410 s.f. or 30% hardcover. If applicant was to attempt to relocate pool in the northern areas of the property, the application as proposed would require a setback variance because of the limited 50' width. Note the required 10' separation has been maintained from pool basin to 2nd story deck structure shown at 12 1/2'. As already noted above, the applicant has satisifed all standards for the conditional use permit as structure meets the required 30' setback from both front and rear lot lines. As for hardships for the variances phase of the application, staff would note the following: a) Shape of lot. b) There is no hardcover within the 500-1,000' setbar’'". area* Such area consists of total of 6,900 s.f. c) All pertinent standards for the conditional use permit for accessory structures on the through lot have been satisifed. Options of Action Approval as proposed, or Approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Removal of reduction in propose'? hardcover. s.f. of existing hardcover or Zoning File #1724 June 2, 1992 Page 3 Jiddltional CoBvents and Planning Cond.ssion Recoowndation The Planning Commis'iion approved the application as proposed granting a 1% hardcover variance within the 250-500' setback area based on the findings and hardships set forth above. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the recommendation of the Planning Commission. • * j I I A RBSOLOTIOH GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 10 AND A VARIANCE TO SECTION 10.22 SUBDIVISION 2 FILE #1724 MHERBAS, Tammy L. Woodis (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 2818 Casco Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lots 16, 26, and 27, Bloclc 4, Casco Heights, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and MHERBAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit per Section 10.03, Subd. 10 to permit the installation of an Inground pool/patio area on a through lot and a variance to Section 10.22, Subd. 2 that would allow an excess of 212 c.f. or 1% hardcover at a total of 5,552 s.f. where only 5,340 s.f. or 30% is allowed. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1724. The property is located in the LR-lC Zoning District requiring 21,780 s.f. or a half acre in area. The property consists of 24,700 s.f. or .56 acres. 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 18, 1992 and recommended unanimous approval of the proposed variance and conditional use permit based upon the following findings: ) The accessory structure, pool and patio, have satisfied all pertinent standards of the conditional use permit section of the code. Page 1 of 3 H ■ b) The unique shape of the lot requires the placement of the pool and patio area within the wider mid-sections of the property. c) There is approximately 6,900 s.f. of area within the 500-1,000' setback area of the property where no hardcover exists but because of the limited 50' width, the improvements could not be located in that portion of the property. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the installation of an inground pool and patio area will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance and conditional use permit on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 2 of 5 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subd. 2 to allow tJ»e-improvements that result in an excess or hardcover over the allowed amount of 5^340 s.f. or 30% resulting in a total of 5,552 ^.f. or 31% and grants a conditional use permit per Section 10.03, Subd. 10 to permit the installation of an inground pool and patio area on the through lot, subject to the following conditions: ► 1. 2. 3. 1992. ATTEST t Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the owner, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (June 8, 1993). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of herself, her heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of June, Dorothy M. Hallln, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Tammy L. Woodis Property Owner(s) Page 3 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )S8. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 8th day of June, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M, Hallin, Mayor 6 City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 twtll STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared the personas) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same «« his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) On this _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ day of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. 199 ' ”® a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 5 4 #1CITY OP ORONO - GENERAL LAND OSS APPLICATIO 9 fT^ A ' x:J PROPERTY LOCATION 3 c-' ri^S( c fl±Site Addres P~0 property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Please attach legal description to applioation if not included on required survey. _ _ _ _ __ _ _ APPLICANT Name U U'OOnOlS. Phone (home) Phone Zwnrk) ^ vX 7 / - Address i V i AlLdii_£_!2±_X:k2— OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone Address City Zip. Date Property Acquired - -- -ccreels ~of land I (do) (do not) also own the f_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (month/year) PEES - CONDITIONAL DSE PERMITS - After-the-Fa;t'r«‘'-“oSbircurrent Application Fee $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg cm CF oROfiO FlriA^CE vFFICB 13:0200000 01 ./fc.'. ♦TLihtCK /5'£LtlF• ifw ;f2262B0 CX'l ROl T1 $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use 03/0. $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain G“din^/«awiil\'"ret'aining'"iari; "thl^ 75' of lalceshor. PRD/PID - see fee schedule APPLICATIONS $200.00 ““ $250.00 — $175.00 $ 50.00 $250.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (♦ consultant fees) Vacation With Roxoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Appeals Ot).er - see fee schedule PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify)_ DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail: 2. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS certin* d p'roVerty^^^ list of owners within 350- (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). Plat Map. . Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). , Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list any other persona you wish notified of this application. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. The annlicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please rSm.mb'lV^ryour application is not complete if the above information ha. not been included. _ _ Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff:- - - - - - --- - - - - - - --- -- - - - - - - - - - - -— Th.“^^ica*n\‘^I^y agrees to provide all information required or ;;:qu.st;rby the Zoning ;d;inistrator, agre.s to pay ^ f‘*fnc««d tSe not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses In review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied i,s ^ru6 dnd correct to the best of his/her knowledge. 1* ,n Date ^ ^Applicant's signature OMHHSS SICNATORB The owner hereby ac)cnowledges and agrees to this «PPl authorized reasonable entry onto the property agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes investigation and verification of this request. *s signature c i^vu// Date _^j^»1Owner . . . . . . . . . .-. . . . .t/- - - - - Applicant must have all submittals into the City JUSPlanning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the cJ/ncU. If sn spplic«.t 1. un.bl. to .tt.nd s scheduled meeting, pl.ss. msk. suthorliod sg.nt attend in your place and advis. the Building t Office of this change prior to the meeting. ♦ 4'*^4 * % \ 1 # ^ ' ^',.1 ;*^>-. .'I ' " ;>. V. ■' r>i‘ ;.-••?•: ■ ■ f-~:''..^ ■ -':r. .. • — m£L ^ •*.. '•:• •.. .-». . V.. -•• tr>fV r-.*-ft . • > * - - *• .»i •>':cV.>-' .yr" k f-.* :’ —' - •- *v v,» . J ^Vi » « * «« • #1724 fv\fiAct4 _•:)(•;)^ I A-H-g-v«-A-<OilJ J^C(i^;^je. MA-iftc^-Si^- t B.fjoLos<?d cux-e. OiUL, -t-K-<2.f^dMS rr)/j.A^'e.iLpri^ r>(\.if^k-e.i^i<xirS c/ fj^QtHt/L-ed +0 ^^-> (iP<^/3.ou io<^ ii\ tv<f\:\CK)Ci pooL- f\.T-Y lr\Oryv^s4<pq;g^^ ■9^g-L.g_CASj:p—g±_^Q og,Q,/OQ_£^a il'^NA -Hyg-): y o u p^CCg-S^ . ~i^ls pr)C-)C pp Ap^g#W4 ^ -^(A.ft.Ccc‘jy A __ _iC^iik^L-^ba<UA<JiLj;_,Q^_s^iO_a^_pcss/'^/«— |_CL^.JZ; o<^x .fe g e4_ov.^-------- §.uujU/WLi-i0^jp-o<D.4:__i f~> %rk-< iL?^..jkJ&r-L^-------- APP RPU etA 4-_amfei -4tio.'jg-e- Co~f-s> ''. L,q4- Ito f\Look.<-v mVACO /-4#>/^if-fe aoH<7-JAA3 - - -:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—-------------------------- „- —..... ................. — f3<-(5ckM cfeco H-'et«3^ts -------------------------------: *3 ■i*’Kmfti 0<^50v-( rsLcscRM <'i^C£0M-eL<=}ff^c "A3-?= O OCXS ^ , , ...._ -<;■ f ty:* ,vV^ jwft/ft — -- —*- \J RUN BATt •i/Z9/n 'i' PROP ADOR ONNtR NANI TAXPAVtR NANt/AOOR PROP AMR '' ONNIR NAM TAMPAVIR NAM/AMR t PROP ABM OM«R NAHi tAXPAVCR MME/AOM > .PtM ABBR ONNIR NAM TAXRAVIR HAM/ABM S8 II-U7-2S 2S iiM 9Z997 CASCO POINT RO A I C RANI A lAWRINCI KANC U97 CASCO POINT RO RAYZATA NN 55591 55 29-117>25 25 M97 92755 CASCO POINT RO 0 S I J BRIITNIR DAVIO S I JANA BRIITNIR 2755 CASCO PT RO NAVZATA NN 55591 T r .4 N M 29-117-25 25 9919 99955 AMRISS UNASSIONID STATI LAM DIPT CITY OP ORC9W 4 PARK A/15/79 ST DIID 15975A SO 29-117-25 25 9915 5279A CASCO POINT RO HARY I JOHNSON NARY I JOHNSON 279A CASCO POINT RO MAYZATA NN 55591 i SO 29-117-2S 25 991A 92797 CASCO POINT RO R J 6RUN0CCN I J A CRUNOCLN RONALS j ORUNOfCN 2797 CASCO PT RO MAYZATA NN 55591 55 29<:i7.2S 25 991% 92755 CASCO POINT RO R I J PUTNAN RICNARB A PUTNAN 27«5 CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA m 55S91 # HIHNEPIN county PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST30 29-117-23 25 9095 92715 CASCO POINT RO TAD ERWIN TERRY A I DOROTHY L ERWIN 2715 CASCO POINT RO WAYZATA NN 55391 35 29-117-25 23 9005 92515 CASCO POINT RO TAMMY L WOOOIS TAMMY LYNN WOOOIS 2515 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA im 55591 55 29-117-25 25 9911 90935 ADDRESS UNASS16NE0 STATE LAND DEPT CITY OF ORONO PARK A/15/79 ST DEED 15A75A 55 29-117-25 25 991A 92501 CASCO POINT RO P J HAUSER i R NASON HAUSER P J HAUSER t R M HAUSER 2591 CASCO PT RO WAYZATA HN 55591 55 29-117-25 25 9017 92795 CASCO POINT RO J D HURO/J L ZEHRINCER-MURO J D NURO/J L ZEHRINGER-HURO 2795 CASCO POINT RO WAYZATA NN 55391 55 29117-25 2A 9009 95759 CASCO AVE ALTUS FEDERAL SA<1NCS BANK ALTUS FEDERAL ••VINCS BAM PO BOK ;90* DOTHAN AL 50502 ✓ .'T E-REPCWT M. PXAS5A01;,^^T ft. n PAOE 15 ..35 20-117-25 23 9000 927A5 CASCO POINT RO S R PETERSON I K A PETERSON STEVEN R PETERSON 2705 CASCO POINT RO WAYZATA HN 55591 : »■t/ 9 ■»>-tr. f..r,.*.% f f ^ ‘* e9 • ETERSON C * * •'** ’ft.'' . : « ■ '■ ■/. . . -vf I a- *' • \ J • * • r * { ^ ^ It' i .. ^ ■ !■. • €/ 35 25-117-25 25 0009 90R55 ADDRESS UNASSIMEO STATE LAM DEPT CITY OF OROM PARK 0/15/79 ST DEED 150710 55 20-II7-2S 25 9512 92770 CASCO POINT RB ROIEM A PRICE ETAL ROLEN A PRICE 2770 CASCO POINT RO WAYZATA HN 5SS91 55 20-117-25 23 0015 02799 CASCO POINT RO KAREN N ORTEMLAO KAREN N ORTEMLAO 2799 CASCO POINT M ' WAYZATA HN 55391 55 29-117-25 25 5915 •2775 CASCO POINT RO EL'INE I OLSON ELA.M ELLEN ERICKSON 277S CASCO PT RO WAYZATA NN 553*1 it.*: L^. t. ■y -• it.. -»( i 55 20-II7-2S 20 0010 •2740 ITNIl AVI L L VICKNAIR I R L VICKNAIR LANCI L • RNOOA L VICKNAIR 2700 ETHEL AVt WAYZATA NN 55391 I i # ‘ ^ ‘ • 0* ■ • «:* . ^ 'I « .miN DATI OS/20/92iATCH OIAPROP ADOir OUNFR NAHC TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 4 PROP AMR OIfNER NAHl TAXPAYER NAm/AODR % PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER HAHE/ADOR PROP AODR OWNER NANI TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR PROP AODR OWfUR NAHi TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR PROP AMR OWNER WANE TAXPATIR NAffEyAMl I s\ • t*HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFOKHATION SYSTEN PROPERTY OWNERS LIST '»•SO 2«-117'23 24 0014 02705 ETHEL AVE LAWRENCE D PILLAR LAWRENCE 0 PILLAR 4027 CARDINAL COVE DR HOUND HN 55S44 . i J V SO 20-117-25 24 0017 02755 ETHEL AVE SONCOR INVESTHENTS HICHAEL D RUTHERFORD 2755 ETHEL AVENUE ORONO HN? 55591 50 20-117-25 24 0020 ^ 02750 CASCO POINT RD DALE A CHRISTENSEN 0 WIFE DALE A CHRISTENSEN 2750 CASCO POINT RO WAYZATA MN 5559X SO 20-117-23 24 0025 •3799 CASCO AVE JOHN 0 ALEXANDER JCHN D i^LtXANDER 5799 CASl n AVE WAYZATA n« 5SS91 i SO 20-117-23 51 0010 05759 CASCO AVE titlCE D HADDEN ETAL BRUCE D HADDEN 3759 CASCO AVEMJE WAYZATA HN 55591 SO 20-117-25 51 0015 00050 ADDRESS UNASSICNED STATE LAM) DEPT CITY OF ORONO CONVEYED 2/0/02 ST DEED 141140 30 2C-117-25 24 001502725 ETHEL AVE JAHES A WILLIAHS JAHES A WILLIAHS 2725 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 30 20-117-23 24 OOlO 02745 ETHEL AVE SUSANNE K DRAPER DOUGLAS C t NEVA L WILLIAHS 2745 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA ml 55391 30 20-117-25 24 0021 02710 CASCO POINT RO C H 0 B J PALMER CURTIS H t BARBARA J PALMER 2710 CASCO POINT RO WAYZATA HN 55591 SB 20-117-25 24 0040 02720 ETHEL AVE JOHN WAYNE 0 JOYCE E MAHPLET JOHN W ( JOYCE HAHBLET , 2720 ETHEL AV MAYZATA HN 55391 3B 20-117-25 31 OOIL •OOSB ADDRESS IMASSIGNCO DEAN V 6REIHANN DEAN V GREIHANU 3779 CASCO AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 30 20-117-23 51 0014 •OOSB ADDRESS UNASSICNEO STATE LAND DEPT CITY OF ORONO CIMVEVED 2/B/B2 ST DEED 141144 ..'tf-- ■ >v/V<-’v'REPORT HO. PI4S54tl‘‘ :4 ..»V ' PAGE I*' mV. </■-7?.v:58 20-117-25 24 001402745 ETHEL AVE ERIC EARL NIELSEN ERIC EARL NIELSEN 2745 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 * y r • * ‘ ...•v. ■ ;..V5. ^ *;* 4* 1 h ‘( < I ..'■X SB 20-117-25 24 B019 0275' CASCO POINT RD DALE A CHRISTENSEN I WIFE DALE A CHRISTENSEN 2750 CASCO POINT RO WAYZATA MN 55591 38 20-117-25 24 0022 02700 CASCO POINT RO 0 P BUESIH6 A L R RUNNING DANIEL BUESING/LINOA RUNNINO : 2700 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA HN 55391 SB 20-117-23 31 B019 03753 CASCO AVE R • C KAIL RICHARD t CAROL RAIL 3753 CASCO AVE WAYZATA mi 55391 30 20-117-25 51 wll4 •0050 ADDRESS UNASSIGNCD STATE LAND DEPT CITY or ORONO LOCAL PONDING AREA 9/5/80 ST DEED I58B97 .J RUN OATI tS/2t/«2 t •i HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION bYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LISTW 20-UF-25 51 0057 02855 CASCO POINT RD AIR XVERSENALFRED A I ROSEMARY IVERSEN 2855 CASCO POINT RO WAYZATA HN 55591 I •Sa 20-117>25 52 0005 02018 CASCO POINT RD TAMMY L WOODIS TAMMY LYNN WOODIS 2616 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA HN 5559156 20*117-25 52 0006 02025 CASCO POINT RO DAVID J YORKS I WIFE DAVID J YORKS 2825 CASCO POINT ROAD WAYZATA MN 55591 ■‘ff1 50 20-117-25 52 0011 02015 CASCO POINT RD e I C SCANLON 6EN€ I CATHERINE SCANLON 2815 CASCO POINT ROAD WAYZATA HN 55591 50 20-117-25 52 0016 02007 CASCO POINT RD M MCCUIRE I H E MCGUIRE MATTHEW I MARY S MCGUIRE 2807 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55591 • •06 03051 t ■ >pV 58 20-117-25 51 006605779 CASCO AVE DEAN V CREIMANN DEAN V GREIMANN 5779 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55591SO 20-117-25 52 0006 02029 CASCO POINT RO OEVERLY K TWEEDY BEVERLY K TWEEDY 2829 CISCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 5559158 20-117-25 52 0009'02021 CASCO POINT RD R E DEMSHAR I M M DEHSHAR RONALD I MARGARET DEMSHAR 2021 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55591 58 20-117-25 52 0012 02815 CASCO POINT RO L I H BACHKES LEONARD I MARY ANN BACHKES 2815 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA rm 55591 SO 20-117-25 52 0C15 02005 CASCO POINT RD ROGER N FROMMEI.T I WIFE ROGER H FROmiEkT 2805 CASCO PT RD WAYZATA MN 55591 REPORT NO. PZ8S5901PACE 17*::38 20-117-25 52 000902818 CASCO POINT RD TAMMY L WOODIS TAMMY LYNN WOODIS 2818 CASCO POINT RO WAYZATA HN 55591 i tr ifr V •50 20-117-25 52 C00702629 CASCO POINT RD B E PETERSON IMP PETERSON BRYCE E PETERSON AND MARY PAT PETERSON 2829 CASCO POINT ROAD WAYZATA HN 5559158 20-117-2S 32 001802617 CASCO POINT RO WESLEY C BYRNE WESLEY C BYRNE 2817 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55591 ■' A';'• ’L** ■' '■ • H,*- • ^ ' ■./■ ' 'If I" f i 38 20-117-25 52 0015 0201I CASCO POINT M GWENDOLYN C ROSS GWEN L ROSS 2611 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA NN 55591 i' * * so 20-117-25 32 0016 02800 CASCO POINT RO thcmas d kino THOMAS B KINO VinwriAS ■ Kinu . ' , . , . . 2800 CASCO POINT ROAD ^ WAYZATA MN 55591 . ' i .. f ' i.l* *^*f*;'T ■ 4 f'7'. l % H6 *H \-.:p* A'•- r» 4 »'» 9 RUN DATI IS/ao/W •‘v< ' ■, • 1 ■ .• /•WTCH , ,f.r. ’•HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO PACE&' •i* '.t:, VT ■••'■ I,* \ '*. >' i' s*V‘- ’ •4 ‘ " T'Tvm V \t\ji .Si r. : ^ , ’i ■ .. • ,?• . « \ I .. A'-. 'T -V • V Vi .,V . > v» • # ,» •.» ‘i -. »i.; ‘ i-4 ; jT * ' . I .; » A - * ' . ■ ’ ' • *-T 4’. V / • * I^ .'i ^ •; ‘ *^ *• * « Vk>'/ > 'A.'v' * ’< *. .> .. . •*»;;; jt •.. ♦ * , , , ' '• ■ l'.*-. » .• ;k; < •> * * •! ' • : . r7-\- f ‘I <! f* 4$ **r *T I ■,v^v J r r/ A. pMss4*i»' 'f ■'•c la • ■<■•..’ /.•■ / gi..;i r, : V h- Wy ■ ''V>w V • ' ^ V’.’ 'if ’ Jt • W*« k Jr-f; ■ ■' •’, C • • » 'V • • , • •• w> • .. *■•,. •' .■l^ ■ 1 ,fc .;■ ^ ■ nt^*^ . f' ‘ t S*''‘ ‘ ; ^ ' * «.. i. .c * t'C .r * ^ ' * ' •% ; f -t a t . • A . 4 i/ .jt.' ^ ^ ' .ti' I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE Al® • REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS "'SJJJ* OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY OEPARTHEHT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO TIK REST i OF NY KNOWLEDGE AND RELIEF DATI , ■ . &v..'K«;: .■ .«ir . Lot 26, Block 4, 2818 Casco Casco Heights • Point Road 20-117-23 32 0004 Lot 27, Block 4,Casco Heights -20-117-23 32 0005 Lot 16, Block 4,Casco Heights ~20-117-23 23 0008 2818 Casco Point Road Code : 38 For 1992 Tax Year / :l /-SF. I/C S.F.i S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F, S.F. S.F. IQQ • 0-75 •0% 75-250'25% 250-500'30% 500-1000'35% EXHIBIT "G" Staff Inventory of Lot Coverage and Hardcover Facts Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Lot Coverage 78.7 s.f. shed 1568 s.f. house 380 s.f. three-season porch 800 s.f. pool basin 766 s.f. patio area Total ■» 3,592.7 s.f. or 14.5% Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover improvements within 250-500' setback area Area » 17,800 s.f. 20.5 X 58 - 1,189 s.f. driveway 24.5 X 64 “ 1,568 s.f. house 12 X 5.5 = 66 s.f. stoop [40 X 10 « 400] [30 X 6 - 180] Total 580 s.f. = deck/three-seascn porch [2nd floor] 47.5 s.f. landscape timbers 25 X 3 “ 75 s.f. cement walk 6.05 X 1.75 = 10.5 s.f. chimney 9.6 X 8.2 = 78.7 s.f. shed 18 X 25 = 450 minus 78.7 of shed area ■» 371.3 s.f., cement slab 40 X 20 ■ 800 s.f. pool basin 54 X 29 ■ 1,566 s.f. minus pool * 766 s.f. patio Total 5,552 s.f. or 31% Ot SCR I >’11 ON: f44f %s ?s vrj \ K n ‘j / • « ->• -f •Jiif - . w*;> r Pi it Q ^* M I' Nxx' '\' '■ ^ .'■'^ '4^f§ V« >k1J /;t*r /.- 5i^i . , ■ ■ i _______ 1—•—~~-r-'*“' T I i»«// lolj 14. 24 »n1 2^ *•CASCO HtlGHVS ... ....M, •!•> ri;.i’.M;"5.tJ!i«s'r.s ;5''!:r'i;:ii?:.”;-Mr'' •'=;.kr£^ " "’•""". CARLSON I CARLSON, INC. LAND SURVttORS ' / r4^l /» r*»i^•Trrr... w V a’At kl / ,,^8rry R" Coulurt, land Survpyor Hlnncsola License No. 9010 NOUS:Total Area Is 24.«0S Square reel or 0.569 Arrti. 30% of total area Is 7,411.5 Square feet. 15% of toU' area Is 3,720.8 Square feet. Area of Shed Is 79 Square feet of Slab is 309 Square feet of Proposed Pool Is 000 Square feet of Proposed Pool Oec% Is 766 Square feet of Moose is 1503 Square feet of Patio Is 255 Square feel of overhead deck not over pa o Is 346 Square feet of Wallt, Stoop and Apron Is 189 Square feel of 8lack».op Driveway Is 11?0 Square feet Total Structural Area to be 3228 Square feet (Shed. Mouse and total Total Iwpervlous surface area Is 5527 Square feet Area Area Area Area Area Area Area Area pool /•'»/€ |AttL$OH lAiM U4 -1 % M i**' Tos Prom: Date: Subject c> Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator V:- Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building s Zoning Administrator June 4, 1992 #1729 Clair Rood, 3280 Navarre Lane - Residential Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Resolution Zoning District: LR-IC, Lakeshore Residential requiring 1/2 acre in area Pertinent Ordinances 1. Section 11.03, Definition 66 (A) - Subdivision shall be classified as Class I subdivision and can be permitted via a metes and bounds description descriL%=d by a registered land surveyor. 2. Section 10.25 - Standards fc' LR-IC Zoning District r-squiring one-half acre in area. Required ■ .5 acres Parcel A ■ 2.64 acres (area east of 15' drainage easement * .5 acres of contiguous dry land) Combined Parcels B & C Total area = .58 acres Dry contiguous » .52 acres 3. Section iO.55, Subdivision 15 (A) (2) - For property ser'-ed by municipal sanitary sewer, the minimum lot area may be divided by flood fringe lands provided at least one-ha 1f acre of land not within the protected area is included in one contiguous parcel and both municipal sewer and legal access is available to that building site without encroachment on the protected area. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Survey of Lot Line Rearrangement E - Sewer As-Builts Zoning File #1729 June 4, 1992 Page 2Description of Lot Line RearremgementMr Rood proposes a lot line rearrangement that would take additional lands from Lot 56 to be <^°'"bined with Lots 54 and 55 Each proposed building site meets or exceeds ,as each contains 1/2 acre of dry contiguous land, i" Jhedesighted wetland within the subject property (Document No. 2737882). Lots 54 and 55 have each been assessed Tri<- S6 a full water unit. As a result the City will require no additional fees for the connection to ^4^ connection permit and meter fee. Lots 54, ^ aaainst the ll^Vr%Tio\ %Z^!rTsrV22.^!'ol ZIW 'fee \°o "be.^pil/l^reach building permit. At the time ,I92 rate'^ilpermit, a SAC fee will be charged. The current 1992 rate is $700.00. Thu approval of this subdivision formally ^^e^o^nizes the independence of the two parcels now from Hr. property to the immediate east and will have an ^ Lview of variance application #1731, Mr. Rood s variance application dealing with the height of pillars within a comprehensive fencing plan for the properties. Planning Connalssion Recominendation To approve the subdivision application of the lot line rearrangement as proposed by |^ach lotlocated at 3280 Navarre Lane ^«sed on the findings that each meets or exceeds the standards of the u - road and thatlot shall achieve access from an approved public road and^that each of the properties has been assessed for se unit. Approval is subject to t. o following conditions? 1 ADDlicant shall apply for the legal combination of Parcels B and C upon the approval of the subdivision application by the Council. 2. Upon application for a building permit for Parcel A or combined Parcels B and C, the following must be provided: a. Applicant shall make payment to the City for a $225.00 sewer unit and SAC fee payment. b. Provide soil testing information for proposed residential conctruction. Zoning File #1729 June 4, 1992 Page 3 3. Applicant shall be responsible for preparing the appropriate Certificates of Title and Deeds for the newly created parcels so that properties can be legally conveyed upon the time of transfer of title or fee ownership. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission's unanimous approval recommendation. Isv A RBSOLOTION APPROVING A NBTES AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION OP A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT FOR CLAIR T. ROOD FILE NO. 1729 WHEREASr the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter "City Council") has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement by Clair T. Rood (hereinafter "the subdivider") of properties located at 3240 and 3280 Navarre Lane within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Lots 34, 53, and 56, "Wallace's Addition to the Village of Minnoton)ca Beach", according to the record of plat thereof and on file at the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"), and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the City for metes and sounds subdivision for division and combination purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the metes and bounds subdivision of a lot line rearrangement for Clair T. Rood as shown on the Certificate of Survey by Mark S. Gronberg dated August 24, 1990, most recently revised June 2, 1992 and attached to this resolution, subject to the following conditions: 1. Upon approval of this subdivision by the City Council of Orono, the subdivider shall legally cosibine for tax purposes Parcels B and C as described in the above noted survey. 2. The aforesaid div'sion as shown on the attached Certificate of Survey shall be filed by the City of Orono with either the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Titles office on or before December 8, 1992 together with a certified original ropy of tliis resolution. Page 1 of 2 The subdivider Is hereby advised that in order to fulfill the intent of this subdivision of a lot line rearrangement, that additional documentation must be created to provide for the legal transfer of fee title. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the division has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota, this 8th day of June, 1992. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor STATE OP MINNESOTA ) ) BS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me on this 8th day of June, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson 6 Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor «i City Clerk of ino City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 2 of 2 imm c.„ o,»,«», - 0, ^W.OPRRTY LOCATION // J. -f Site Address f-f_ _ _^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 2-3 • M 9/^ jO^ssj Please check one - Property _ _ abstract or ^'"^^torrens? Attach legal description to application. APPLICANT Phone (home) Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (work) ^7/- / S^^’f Address; City: Zip; ONNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Name k a«v"~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (work) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Address; _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ City;_ _ _ _Zip;_ _ _ _ _ _ (attach list if more than one) Sa STING LAND DSE lU'i OF 0R0}^Q Number of Tax Parcels___________ FI^AsCE OFFICE . . i./i.'v'ti/wW Development Size Acres Dry Land 01 OEH Acres Wet Land LMtiK lu Jv^.vv Acres Total, all parcels . ...■■■ . . if f fWty TnO», Present Use (check) K Residential; no. of units _ _ _ _ _ _V^-ycV _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Zoning District_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PROPOSAL _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites; _ _ _ _ _ _ Existing Units _ _ _/ New Units _ _ _^_ _ Total Units Proposed Gross Density; _ _ _/_ _ _ Units per __ _ Acres Minimum Lot Size: Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use; (check) ^ Residential _ _ _ _ _ _ Other (specify) RIHIMDM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION1. Completed Application Form Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). As an addendum to this applicationr please /?^ttach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 2. 3. 4. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date 1. Payment of fees (par)c fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). 2. Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PEES _ _ S)cetch Plan Review (Class I, II i III) \/^ Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Preliminary Review (Class I s II Subdivision) $200.00 300.00 300.00 Preliminary Review (Class III & all non—residential) 325.00 +■ ^ 25.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) *(Plu8 any legal or engineering charges) Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Final Subdivision Application 175.00 150.00 100.00 The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature Date >2.y Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Conmission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Conmission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please malce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your p>lace and to advise the Building t Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. + ^ RUN DATE 0S/50/M .. ,5>' ■ ^.? ^ BATCH 00« V HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LISTPROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER : NA^/ADDRi s ‘ * • SB 17*117-2S 41 0002 02140 KEM4000 HAYCARL S JOHNSON DONNA E KABANUK 4451 DALLAS RO HPLS m 55450 ■4 ■S ’ ‘prop ador ONNER NAME ■» TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR i M 17-117-ES 41 0005 OOOSB ADDRESS UKASSIGNED PAUL R NOimERG PAUL R H0LHDER6 17961 9TM AVE N E POULSSO HA 98S70 iI PROP AOOR OHT«ER NAME TAXPAYER NA>«/A00R SB 17-117-25 41 0015 05245 CRYSTAL BAY RO HARK C ZA6ARIA HARR C ZAOARIA 1524 21ST AVE N E ROCHESTER rtl 55404 -I't "^'pROP AOOR OltlER MAME TAXPAYER I NAf^/AODR J ■n ■r 5B 17-117-25 41 0017 05515 CRYSTAL BAY RO DAVID H STANLEY DAVID H STANLEY 5515 CRYSTAL BAY RO HAYZATA 55541 I' L PROP AODR ^OM«R NAME <i TAXPAYER < NAME/AOOR 56 17-117-25 41 0020 05555 CRYSTAL BAY RO A LORRAINE MOSS A LORRAINE HOSS 5555 CRYSTAL BAY RO HAYZATA m 55541 4 3 4 PROP ADOR ONNER NAME SB 17-117-25 41 0025 05544 CRYSTAL BAY RO NARRCN L PASCHKE *^TA)9AYER • «^NARREN L PASCHKE NAHE/AOOR * *14441 VILLAGE HOODS OR EMN PRAIRIE IB4 55547 * ‘i/ * « 38 17-117-25 41 000502150 KE^PNX)D NAY H L A J M PAASCH JAYNE M PAASCH 2150 KENHOOO HAY HAYZATA MN 55541 56 17-117-25 41 0004 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED PAUL R HOLMDERG PAUL R HOLMDERG 17441 4TH AVE N E POULSBO HA 98570 58 17-117-25 41 0015 05285 CRYSTAL BAY RO THOMAS E MC MUE ETAL THOMAS E HCCUE 3285 CRYSTAL BAY RD HAYZATA MN 55591 58 17-117-25 41 0018 05525 CRYSTAL BAY RD R J SIAKEL ADD SIAKEL RICHARD J A DEBORAH 0 SIAKEL 5525 CRYSTAL BAY RO HAYZATA MN 55591 58 17-117-25 41 0021 05559 CRYSTAL BAY RO PATRICK 0 O'FLANAGAN DONALD J STOYFE 5554 CRYSTAL BAY RO HAYZATA MN 55541 58 17-117-25 41 0024 05555 CRYSTAL BAY RO E KUST JOHN KUST 3555 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD HAYZATA m 55541 REPORT NO. PI455401 PAGE 17 •'58 17-117-25 41 000402160 KENHOOO NAY S P 0ITP1ICK A B D?»t1ICK STAR A TRIBUNE EHP CREDIT UN 425 PORTLAND AVE MPLS TtT 55488 58 17-117-25 41 0007 00058 address UNASSIGICO PAUL R H0LMBER6 PAUL R HOLMBERG 17B81 9TH AVE N E POULSBO HA 98570 H >rs.vrv 38 17-117-25 41 0014 05509 CRYSTAL BAY RD PAP GUSTAFSON ROBERT HEGERHAN 5509 CRYSTAL BAY RD HAYZATA Ifl 55591 58 17-117-25 41 0019 05329 CRYSTAL BAY RO 0 L MEEKS A J HOLTZ DIXIE LEE ECEKS/JIMMIE HOLTZ 5529 CRYSTAL DAY RO HAYZATA HN 55391 1>i. tH 58 17-117-25 41 0022 05545 CRYSTAL BAY RO ALINE K OGLANO ALINE K OGLANO 3345 CRYSTAL DAY RO HAYZATA MN 55591 38 17-117-25 41 0025 05559 CRYSTAL BAY RO GREGORY H LONG A NIFE GREGORY N LONB 3359 CRYSTAL BAY RO HAYZATA MN 55541 ■* V RUN DATE OS/30/nBATCH 004 ii-'• i .HEr#«PIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OKJERS LISTSB 17-117-21 41 0026 PROP APDR .'00016 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 0I4IER NAME . HELEN M THOMPSON TAXPAYER HELEN H THOMPSON NAME/ADDR 6325 NEST 6R0ADHAY ra>LS t«4 55428i •' *• ‘^'^^PK»k00nJ oZ170 KE SO 17-117-21 41 0029 :: • • •HAY 0»MER NAME o DO»tlA E KABANUK ^ iTAXPAYER NAME/ADDR V DONNA E KABANUK 6931 DALLAS RD BROOKLYN CENTER m 55430 1 ^ <• ■ * PROP ADOR ,: . ‘ OHNER NAME * 1TAXPAYER ' NAME/ADDR \r ,1 j SB 17-117-23 44 0016 03365 CRYSTAL BAY RD J R LOFRANO ETAL 'J R LO FRANO 1365 CRYSTAL BAY RD ' NAYZATA »tl 55391 4 . I. ' .PROP ADOR 0»tCR NAME ^ ^TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR ■4 ^ ■ SB 17-117-23 44 0012 0003B ADDRESS UNASSI04ED GENE AND SHERYLL BLOCK GENE AND SHERYLL BLOCK 2305 BAYVIEH PLACE NAYZATA m 65391 3 ' ?PROP ADOR 0»MER NAME' TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 1 i i IB 17-117-23 44 0040 02260 BAYVIEH PL JACQUELYM4 J ZONTELLI ET AL JACCl SCGNER 2260 BAYVIEH PLACE NAYZATA M4 65391 ♦; 1 3 ^PROP ADOR V OMCR NAME ;‘4 TAXPAYER - A NAME/AOOR SB 17-117-23 44 0044 0003B ADDRESS UNASSIGNED C H PALMER • B J PALMER CMIIS A BARBARA PALMER 2710 CASCO PT RD ORONO M4 55391 * I, t Is-.. 36 17-117-25 il 002705210 NAVARr.E LA CLARENCE 0 SCMRAPP ETAL ELBERT GINKEL 3210 NAVARRE LANE NAYZATA MN 5559136 17-117-23 91 0030 00036 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED DOrtU KABANUK D0rt4A t/.BANUK 6951 DALLAS RD BROOKLYN CENTER HN 55930 36 17-117-23 99 0017 05569 CRYSTAL BAY RD J B DAHLHAf4 t H A DAHLHAN JON N PAPAS 3369 CRYSTAL BAY RD NAYZATA MN 55391 36 17-117-23 99 0033 02305 BAYVIEH PL R M STELLirx; ETAL GENE H BLOCK 2305 BAYVIEH PLACE NAYZATA HN 55591 36 17-117-23 99 0091 02250 BAYVIEH PL CATHY JO TURNER CATHY JO TURNER 5016 ENCHAfnED RD MOUND MN 55569 36 17-117-23 99 0095 00056 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO C H PALMER i B J PAL^€R CHRIS I BARBARA PALMER 2710 CASCO PT RD ORQMO m 55391 REPORT NO. PI955901 PAGE 1636 17-117-23 91 002602160 KENI'DOO HAYCONRAD J MELNICKCOr^RAD J I MAUREEN L MELNICK2160 KErMXM) HAYNAYZATA MN 5539136 17-117-23 41 0031 - 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO DONNA E KUBANUK DONNA E KUBANUK 6951 DALLAS ROAD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 38 17-117-23 44 0016 03575 CRYSTAL BAY RD JAY B KEISER ETAL JAY B KEISER 3575 CRYSTAL BAY RO NAYZATA MN 55591 56 17-117-25 44 0059 02260 BAYVIEH PL JACQUELYNN J ZOKTELLI ET AL JACCl SEGNER 2260 BAYVIEH PLACE NAYZATA MN 55591 1 r 38 17-117-23 44 0042 02290 BAYVIEH PL 0 S HILLIAMSON ETAL 0 S HILLIAMSON 2290 BAYVIEH PL NAYZATA MN 55391 36 17-117-23 94 0046 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO C H PALMER i 6 J PALMER CHRIS t BAWARA PALMER 2710 CASCO PT RO ORONO MN 55591 «* ♦* I. r. ■*»( . r- * . \. »• • t ■ F t. ' I. »• 4 t . • 4 1 ( r 1 „ , RUN DATE 03/30/92- y f. '} BATCH OOA I «t % .#..I-HENNEPIN COLffTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHI4ERS LISTr• PROP ADOR OW4ER NAME : TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR SB 17-117-23 44 0047 0003B ADDRESS UNASSIGNEB C H PALMER A B J PALE«R CHRIS A BARBARA PALMER 2710 CASCO PT RD ORONO MN 55391 .) • PROP ADOR ^ OttlER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR ^ 'A SB 17-117-23 44 OOS5 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED C T ROOD AID ROOD CLAIR T A LYEM D ROW 2215 KEEMOOO HAY NAYZATA m 5S391 PMP AOOfI ONNER Hkm 'TAXPAYER , % NAHE/ADOR • % SB 17-117-23 44 OOSB 03220 NAVARRE LA RICHARD A PROUOFIT ROBERT J RITCHIE 1901 BEACH LA NAYZATA »t4 55391 y V V It PROP ADOR OHNER NAMf TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR y \.. ’-f SB 17-117-23 44 0008 03215 LAFAYETTE RIDGE CT CHEYEFtC LAND CO DENNIS H A JANE 0 BURGESS 3215 LAFAYETTE RIDGE CT NAYZATA NN 55391 Si .V. PROP ADDR ! ■ OFMER NAME ' TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR . . SB 17-117-23 44 0091 032A5 LAFAYETTE RIDGE CHEYEMC LAND CO CHEVEfME LAND COMPANY 742 TNELVE OAKS CENTER 15500 NAYZATA BLVD NAYZATA FM 55391 3 PROP ADDR . (PtCR NAME •Waxpaylr • ^ NAME/ADDR 5| . t'. SB 17-117-23 44 0094 00010 ADORESS UNASSIGNEB LAFAYETTE RIDGE NOMEOIOORS LAFAYETTE RIDGE HGMECPMERS 1709 N FARM ROAD LONG LAKE Et4 55354 \ J r, # % ^ f -' w r FMfr- * >»;I */' 38 17-117-23 44 004800038 AOORESS UNASSIGNED JACQUELYNN J ZONTELLI JACCI SEGNER 2260 BAYVIEH PLACE NAYZATA FM 55391 38 17-117-25 44 0054 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO C T ROOD A L 0 ROOD CLAIR T 1 LYNN 0 ROOD 2215 KEFBOOD HAY NAYZATA FtF 55391 58 17-117-23 44 0082 02200 BAYVIEH PL DALE MATSON ETAL DALE MATSON ETAL 2200 BAYVIEH PLACE HAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0089 0522S LAFAYETTE RIDGE CT J 4 B LARSON JOHN T 4 BETTE J LARSON 3225 LAFAYETTE RIDGE CT HAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0092 03245 LAFAYETTE RIDGE CT 0 F BRIGGS 4 S J BRIGGS DAVID F 4 SUSAN J BRIGGS 5295 LAFAYETTE RIDGE CT NAYZATA n4 55391 5B 17-117-23 49 0095 00038 ADDRESS UFIASSIGNED lAFAVETTE RIDGE HOFCOFVtfRS LAFAYETTE RIDGE HOF1EO»#4ERS 1709 N FARM ROAD LOF46 LAKE F9i 55354 REPORT NO. PI935401 PAGE 1938 17-117-23 94 005400038 AOORESS UNASSIGF€0 C T ROOD 4 L D ROOD CLAIR T 4 LYNN 0 ROOD 2215 KEFMOOO NAY HAYZATA FW 55391 9 ♦ 38 17-117-23 44 0057 02215 KEF*«X)0 NAY C T ROOD 4 L 0 ROOD CLAIR ROOD 2214 KENH HAYZATA FM NAY 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0083 02230 BAYVIEH PL J L SCHNECK 4 P H SCHFCCK J L 4 P M SCIMECR 2230 BAYVIEH PL S HAYZATA Ftl 55391 r,‘ 1 CQ » { 38 17-117-23 44 0090 03285 LAFAYEHE RIOGE CT SALLY J F1CCABE SALLY J HCCABE 5285 LAFAYETTE RIDGE CT F4AYZATA Ft4 55391 /•/ ^^.[3 . • U.^tA . > I 58 17-117-23 44 0093 00038 AOORESS UNASSIGNED LAFAYETTE RIDGE HOFCOFBCRS LAFAYETTE RIDGE HOMECMffRS 1709 N FARM ROAD LONG LAKE Ftl 55354 ■y ' t . * 38 17-117-23 44 0094 07300 BAYVIEH PL V :quelyf«4 j zofytclli et al 4 ^TEL J SEGNER L260 BAYVIEH PLACE NAYZATA FtJ 55391 RUN DATE 0S/30/9t>• . ■ BATCH OOA' ■ PROP AODR J . ' OHNCR NAME TAXPAYER '.NAHE/ADOR>i > > 1 ^ . f. ’M| H Pm)P ADDK ; OHNER NAHE .TAXPAYER . NAHE/ADOR . > . »i ^ ■ . r ^ ‘ ■ prop' AODR -VOMNCR NAME ^.TAXPAYER \ NA»ff/AODR 4 SB 17*117-2S 44 0040 03S00 NAVARRE LA JACRUELYNN J SEGNER JACRUELYM4 J SEGNER 2260 BAYVIEH PL NAYZATA 55341B2. U-117-2S S3 0003 03171 LAFAYETTE RIOGE RO C J OUNUP A H 0 DUNLAP C J A M 0 DUNLAP 3171 LAFAYETTE RIOGE RO NAYZATA m 55341 B2 14-117-23 33 0006 03154 LAFAYETTE RIOGE RO P A E HILLER PETER N A ELIZABETH A HILLER 3154 LAFAYETTE RIOGE RO NAYZATA m 55341 HE(tIEPlN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OFtlEPS LIST38 17-117-23 44 010302260 BAYVIEH PL JACQUELYItl J ZONTELLI ET AL JACCI SEGNER 2260 BAYVIEH PL NAYZATA 5534182 16-117-23 33 0004 03167 LAFAYETTE RIDGE RO R A A M L FAULKNER ROBERT A FAULKNER 3167 LAFAYETTE RIDGE RD HINT^TONKA BEACH m 55361 82 16-117-23 33 0007 03155 LAFAYETTE RIDGE RD BAS FREEDMAN BARRY A FREEDMAN 3155 LAFAYETTE RIDGE RD NAYZATA MN 55341 « f. i .•i;t-V ( ' i PROP AODR ^ OHNER NAME W . Cl .TAXPAYER I r TOTAL MTCH F ’ ■-I • 'r ,''I';,?:' 004 00063 li- fil - iK ■ « • ‘Tn^r—P '-’fe > iflU 0R»*H 9 if ■■ . . . .- 2 1992 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 2082 16-117-23 32 002403128 OLD COUNTY RD EON STEARNS DONNA HUNTSBERGER 3128 OLD COUNTY RO 15 NAYZATA Ftl 5539182 16-117-23 33 0005 03163 LAFAYETTE RIOGE RO SAD SIMPSON STEVEN R A DIANE E SIMPSON 3163 LAFAYETTE RIDGE RD MINNETONKA BEACH MN 55361 82 16-117-23 33 0014 00082 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO LAFAYETTE RIDGE H0ME0I41ERS LAFAYETTE RIOGE HONEOFBtERS PO BOX 41 MTKA BEACH FM 55361 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENTTEPIN COlAfTY OEPART^ENJ OF PROPERPP TAXATION. TO THr;*EST OF HV KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF DATE PARTNENT ^- / / Wm, , f • •• / i . •f ‘ 91: i . J fn • t • • f .-N, ^■ 4 B ! .4. * i 4 4 •.1 ft 6< «. f * . • I \ ' * f r =tfe < I ^ 4 yt » ^ ‘B r / /\ / / /.y nmw ( W) / (O-' •tv/ V^ s '. i47)• •. (Mrr . L^ \ \.... * ,’'.cSf; <ti • *. t 1 * ITi)’ * ^ r *i*n X>r ' ^m^' %% 9^ .1 *1'«' («7I <• I I «i II V jr-m «• • ri . 4 V A" »t ••« n\ \ CMA 4^ - (•*» ^ at i ',?'’?u;?{r' *jc«ar <^” '* J!f ‘ <»») («0> 1 1 111 1 \\ 1 \\ (V)(54) -LiuS Lj«2f^ V* . ••< »t ••Lprr #-i I (f I ' \>Sh*ii\' V‘f *1 ^ f I i> J Ii^^\j'i!-"-l ' I .^‘■Tjf r I .a' ' vis (P «>• aiK # Itii v\VV'^ijij sLJi>>\ *> r V'Ji^*A it <^) M A t; H (•Ml • • H « II V (15) OLD COUNTY RD 7» ■■"X” V (m/ j\-r=:-« tm \—iftfc ------ (ir)./> J.a/ ) *w- - •! I I/) /•* A k - .»»-'' ir’ \ /i f ■■' i '^77 ^. 4. r » • jr ' (nr A 1L V ^1, •#! V ,V%\ ;/ <• ‘’'5 // '■^Myr/Z •i;.'\' Mn«i 4 (Ul /^%'i \ ♦% f* '-A—►«M « i< r /%• m IL / i^jfAjyrTi t / W«i i lUict 4ft4i t • • • 9§ SMilf foa Ci«lt 'waiiAri \ AMiiiM *• INI t liiMfftoai* im(m* Tos Froax Date: Subject: o,. % 7 Chairman K Ic' and Planning Commission Mcriiers Mayor Peternon and City Council ^ Ron Moorse, City Administrator ‘V Jeanne A. Mabusthr Building & Zoning Administrator ^ May 12, 1992 #1731 Clair Rood, 3280 Navarre Lane - Variance - Public Hearing ’¥Q Fertinent Urdinances - Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (C) - 3 1/2* high fences/ 11s are nonencroachment* within any yard area. (Review Exhibit G. • Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (E) - 6' high fences/walls allowed in rear yards of properties. (Review Exhibit G.) Section 10.03, Subdivison 15 (P) - 6' high fences/walls allowed within side yards. (Review Exhibit G.) Section 10.03, Subdivision 16 - Traffic Visi?ility - Plantings and structures limited to 3' height within 30' protection zone (Review Exhibit E). Setrion 10.25, Subdivision 6 - LR-lC District required setbacks: Front/street ■ 30* Rear ■ 30' Side - 10' Slde/street ■ 15' Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 - setback frcm wetland: Required ■ 26' Applicant seeks height variance for pillars (fencing) installed in proposed front and side street yards of two future building sites (Review Exhibit I). Front Allowed 1/2' Proposed 4 1/2' Variance • 1 or 33.31 Side Allowed ■ €' per Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (F). During the preliminary discussions with staff in the preparation of the land a eration application, applicant sought advice as to an allowed height for a wall like structure, tasedi on the property owned by applicant (Review Exhibit H), staff advised that It Zoning Memo #1731 May 12, 1992 Page 2 would appear a 6' high fence would be allowed in the side and rear yard, since the code did not distinguish between side and rear yards adjacent to a rtreet. Applicant did not provide a survey of the property at that time nor a plan locating the proposed fencing. Allowed ■ 3 1/2' per Planning Commission's interpretation of ordinance 6/91. Based on staff memos and minutes of meeting, it is not clear what Planning Commission based their opinion. List of Exhibits - A - Application A 1 - Applicant's Addendum B - Plat Map - Property Owner's List - Pillar/Hedge Fencing Elevation - Landscape Plan - Council Minutes 7/22/91 - Section 10.03, Subd. 15 (C), (D), (E) and (F) - Yard Designations for Property as One Building Site - Yard Designations of Properties as Three Independent Units C D E F G H I Description of Request During the review of Application #1604, the applicant was given the opportunity to file an add on variance application. The applicant seeks a variance to the allowed height for a pillar or monument to be spaced every 20' between sections of natural planting. Based on the Planning Commission's preliminary interpretation at their June, 1991, meeting, yard areas adjacent to streets were allowed only a 3 1/2* high fence. Staff's preliminary discussions with applicant were based on the comprehensive land holdings of the owner. Rood did not advise of the eventual separation of the properties into three separate residential units. The variance application must relate to the newly defined residential lot lines. Review Exhibit I. Description of Bardshlp Please review applicant's addendum Exhibit A-1. Staff would add that the unimproved right-of-way (Hillside Place) shown at a 25' width would never meet the required width for development of a public or private road and that based on current zoning, the roadway will only serve a maximum of two residential units. ■4 4 Zoning Pile #1731 May 12, 1992 Page 3 Options of Action To approve as proposed or To approve 4 1/2' high pillars in side yard and to require 3 1/2' high pillars in front/street yard or If the height variance within front and side yards for the proposed fencing is denied, applicant must reduce height of structures by 1' maintaining a 3 1/2' height. These alterations must be completed no later than _________________. Staff must ask that all pillars and hedges be immediately altered and maintained at no greater height than 3' within the traffic visibility triangle as shown on Exhibit E at the intersection of Navarre Lane and the 25' unimproved right-of-way. Zoning Memo #1731 June 4, 1992 Page 4 Additional Cooments and Planning Coaoiission Recomnendation The applicant accepted the City's position that based on the recently approved subdivision of a ioL line rearrangement that the setback areas under consideration are front/street and side street yards rather than as originally proposed (Application #1604) side and rear street yards. Rood concurred that the pillars would be maintained at a 3 1/2' height in the front street yard of the proposed new building sites and he also agreed to maintain the 3' height for plantings and fencing within the traffic visibility area at the intersection of Navarre Lane and unimproved Hillside Place. Applicant asked the Planning Commission to consider a 4 1/2' high pillar in the side street yards of both properties which run along undeveloped Hillside Place. The Planning Commission approved applicant's request for a 4 1/2' high pillar. The Planning Commission failed to set a deadline for the required alteration of the pillars to be reduced in height within front street yards and traffic visibility area. Staff would recommend that applicant be given thirty days from the date of Council approval to make the necessary adjustments in the pillars. The approval resolution has been drafted to include this deadline. Council may recommend another. A RESOLOTION GRAHTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 15 (C) PILE #1731 NBERBAS, Clair T. Rood, hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 3240 and 3280 Navarre Lane within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Refer to Exhibit "A" attached. WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (C) to permit the construction of fencing consisting of hedges and 4 1/2' high pillars where only a 3 1/2' high pillar would be allowed adjacent to a public right-of-way. Minnesota; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1731. The property is located in the LR-IC Zoning District requiring 1/2 acre in area. Each lot meets or exceeds a 1/2 acre dry contiguous area. 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 18, 1992 and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings: The unimproved right-of-way referred to as Hillside Place shown at a 25' width does not meet width requirements for a public or private road and that based on current zoning the roadway will only serve a maximum of two residential units. The proposed location of the 4 1/2' high pillars within the street yards of the properties will not create a sighting problem for the users of the unimproved right- of-way of Hillside Place. Page 1 of 4 The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this pj^operty are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district? that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions# light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property? would not merely serve as a convenien'^e to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demon rable hardship or difficulty? is necessary to preser’ a substantial property right of the applicant? and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (C) to permit the construction of fencing consist:ing of hedges and 4 1/2* high pillars where 3 1/2* high pillars would be allowed adjacent to a public right-of-way, subject to the following conditions: 1.Applicant shall alter height of pillars within front/street yard of properties to a 3 1/2' height and to a 3' height for those pillars located within the traffic visibility area at the intersection of unimproved Hillside Place and Navarre Lane by July 8, 1992, Applicant shall maintain fencing at 3' height in traffic visibility area defined as follows: "Beginning at the intersection of the projected curve lines of two intersecting streets, thence 30' along one curb line, thence diagonally to a point 30' from the point of beginning on the other curb line, thence to the point of beginning." i Page 2 of 4 1992. 2. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 3. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 0th day of June, ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Clair T. Rood Property Owner(s) state of MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before mo on this 8th day of June, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson t Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor t City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _day of _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _» 199 » before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed tHe foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 4 of 4 » 110(^ o'Li*- * c y/'93/ C J / f) CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION fr Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each a'^ditional variance) a # ^ Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (nrchange from original ^ Variance for non conforming use 5200.00 // After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) •• ;•* V property inpormation site Address /^_=. Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) Ati^riegai description to application if not Present use of proper”^properry; . . . . . . zoning District; _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- applicant ....... Name Cl t*. 4 / Phone (work) triftwi* WM 01 5v*' fjSSi- . -. “i:.- i I I'-V GWrurdlfferenriha^ applicant) Phone (heme) ^ .• -~i - .* •’* *»f* ^ V(*‘x / V Phone (work) Name Address: __City:Zip; description of request Estimated Construction Cost $.^joO .c Describe r.equest in detail: ^ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage % *i^ Setback;Front Side ___ Average LaJeeshore Other (specify) BA^SHIP/DBSCRIPTION of UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS conditions preventing cem^iance w.tn awning m _____ ......---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- / ....................... . ----------------- -- --------------------------- (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following Infonaatlon must be stibmitted by the application deadline date in order for yoor application to be considered conpletet 1. 2. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin Countj Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center • 348-3271). 3. _Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. __Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%'*xll* for reproduction)• 5. __Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8*s"xll'*). 6. _Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%**xll"). 7. _As an addendum to this appllcationr please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above Inforauition has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information suppxied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date OHHBRS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authori2es reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planring Commission Meetings are held on the third Mcnday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled reyiav Meetings of the Planning CoHaission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place end to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. /I-/ CLAIR T. ROOD / 2215 KENWOOD WAY / WAYZATA, WJ 55391 / 471-8548 May 11* 1992 To The City of Orono I am requesting a variance for my brick pillars along Hillside Place. It was originally indicated to roe to be my backyard and that to build brick piers 6’ high would be acceptable. However it has since been decided that perhaps some time in the future Hillside Place may become an alleyway. Hillsif*' Place is currently a 25* wide right-of-way. The reason I am asking for the variance along Hillside Place is as follows: 1 wish to plant a hedge or arborvitae trees between the brick pillars. If the pillars are 3»j ft. high and the hedge is 6 ft. high, this would not be aesthetically pleasing. By having brick pillars the same height or higher than a hedge would give the hedge a much more balanced appearance. My understanding is that there is no variance required to plant trees, shrubs or a hedge along that property line to a height of 6 feet. I am also planning to build a now house on the southwest co-ner of my property. Directly across from the future alleyway there currently are junk cars, motor homes, debris everywhere, plus the rental house usually has 9 cars parked there each day. I would very much like to block out from my site this unsightly area so as to maintain my own property value, with the intention of having every angle as much as possible, aesthetically acceptable. am an/ious to conplote and make these improvements which would be of benefit to all and not a hindrance tu anyone. Not only is there a time and coat factor which I am prepared to make, but I am at a lost to do so until I receive the necessary go-aheadr Thanking you for your conside ition. A V • / Clair T. Rood £ // - -i V»; ’A « '^' Ur-'.^ryyZJ^ (n» nCsei^^S 1 ;• '3ft?^ U 'p(n V . >5^v: i« jv ,t < iM' (tn ^ ««C MC « « *• r« « »• ft •« '•« • UMIJft* ■**» 4\, 4\ .'^>"• (19) n»)(151 i ■ III (4).w^. (•jjn r u4 (17) (31) «% N 1 V I 0 ii4 mu 9 «t4) pfSf 1. N*.i|U\ ^ »«i\ >\' ' • i\^' •»\ II <<- \ VA #§■ A y'^ 4 ft' ,f'*y •rv^X4V:v,v’;. “'>roA'l^r f* 11 (51) IA>^^ V*. '4 P ■O ’ n (57) (4c '# « « «1 i * •(5t)^ ^(15) ft! n I OLD CCuNlY RD IM W (tS* *> Jl*' f o itt w ,«>!/ ^ :> ( 15) 5Ll/ --------- % - H (»/) in-i i - \* I Ml A.rl*^ ,?«,.*','* <"' HI !(^'*' mn m f ^ Hl'% 'V'>'ft *^'<5 / a i ^ ( :5) ^ \ > y;; .♦ ,> «!») /3r/ rwi OATC OS/iO/92 BATCH 00^fitUN.t'iit • ixitii I t'HOPfRr.' if.'fomunon :,v5U m PROPERTY OMIERS LIST fit PORT flO. PI^SMOI PACE 17V > •v f J PROP AODR OHttER HAH8 TAXPAYER NAHf/AOOR PROP ADCR OtStCR ttAMt TAXPAVFR NAHE/ADDR Prop aodr OtPlER fiAHI TAXPAYER NAMC/AJ50P PROP AOOR Ot*i€lt NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR OHftfR ftAMI TAXPAYER NAMI^AOOR S8 17-117-n *l 0002 OtHO KENNOOO HAY CARL S JOHNSON DOtMA E RABANUK APSI DALLAS RO HPLS EM 6S<»SOSR 17-117-21 R1 OOOS OOOSO ADDRESS UNASSIGICO PAUL R NOLNDERG PAUL R HOLtffERO 17PA1 9TH AVe N E POULSaO HA 48S70 It 17-117-21 A1 Dots 0129P CRYSTAL RAY RD HAmR C 2A0ARIA HARR r /A6ARIA 1B2A tlSr AVE N E ROCHESTER ffff SS90R M 17-117-21 41 0017 OISIS CRYSTAL DAY RO DAVID H STANLEY DAVID H STANltV 11*S CRYSTAL BAY RD NAY2ATA »•< 6SJn M 17-117-21 41 0020 OSSli CRYSTAL BAY RO A LORRAINE HOSS A LOUUINI HUSS USB crystal bay RO HAYZATA HN BBSPI SB 17-117-21 41 OOOS 02150 RENHOOO HAY II L A J H PAASCM JAYNE M PAASCH 2150 REtiOOD HAY lUYZATA Itt SBS91 58 17-117r2lJ41 0U018 ^OORJ ’^4; )ERG 0006 UNASSIGt€0 PAyj^R\H))LMD?RG |M^ llbLMUERG 17S^l/»TH AVE N E POULSBO HA 98370 18 17-117-21 41 OOIS 0S285 CRYSTAL BAY RO THO^'.r , < MC MUE ITAL TliOHA> E HCCUE 5285 CRYSTAL BAY RO HAYZAfA Itt 55591 58 17-117-25 41 0018 01125 CRYSTAL BAY RO R J SIAKEL ADO SIAKEL RICIIAHD j a OEDURAM 0 SIAKEL 5125 CRYSTAL BAY RO HAYZATA Ttt 55591 18 17-117-23 41 0021 03119 CRYSTAL BAY RD PATRICK r O'FLANAGAN DONALD J SrOYTE 1559 CVSTAL BAY RO HAYZ a 'AHN £5191 38 17-117-21 41 000402U0 KEI8TOOO HAY S P DIHMICK A 8 DIlfUCK STAR A TRIBUNE EHP CREDIT UN 425 PORTLAND AVE MPLS m 55488 38 17-117-21^1 0007 00038 >AOORUS ItUSSIOlEO PAU^ RiNOUtBETO PAUD^^HOLHDERO 1788t 9TII AVE N E POULSBO HA 98170 58 17-117-23 41 OOU 01509 CRYSTAL BAY RO PAP GUSTAFSON ROBERT HEGERMAH 3109 CRYSTAL BAY RO HAYZATA HN 55191 38 17-117-23 41 0014 03529 CRYSTAL BAY RO 0 I HECKS A J HOLTZ DIXIE LEE HEEKS/JITfiie HOITZ 5529 CRYSTAL BAY RO HAYZATA Itt 55191 50 17-117-21 41 0022 01545 CRYSTAL BAY R0 ALINE R OCLAfa ALINE K OGIANO 5145 CRYSTAL BAY ROl HAYZATA Itt SSJ91 tH 4b 8'PROP AOOR OIttfR NAHi TAXPAYIR . NAME/AOOR mm 18 17-117-21 41 0023 03149 crystal bay RO IttRREN L PAXCHKE HARBIN I 14441 VT». ABE ->. 003 OR IDEM nUUalE m 55147 IB 17-117-21 41 0024 01355 CRYSTAL BAY RO JOHN I K 1ST JOHN KUS ' 3155 ClYiTAL BAY RdiO HAYZATA PH 5519* IB 17-117-23 41 BBEfi OS159 CRYSTAL BAY BO CRieORV H lONB 1 Miff GREGORY H LONG 5159 CRYSTAL BAT RO HAYZATA tot BB591 m\ DATE 01/10/^1 BATCH CCA IfirffllPlN coumv PNOPtRIY INFORIUTION SYSUM PROPERTY 0UUER3 LI3T REPORT NO. PlASSAOl PAGE 16PROP ADDRman NAHB TAXPAYTR NAHE/AOOR SB 17-117-21 A1 0024 OOOSi ADDRESS UNASSIC^D HE LIN H THOMPSON HELEN H T’lOHPSON 4125 NEST BROADHAY WIS NN S5A2B 38 17-117-23 A1 002703210 NAVARRE LA CLARErKE 0 SCIIRAPP ETAL ELBERT Cirfl^tL 5210 NAVARRE LANE HAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 41 002802160 KENHOOO WAYC0I4RAD J HELNICKCONRAD J A MAUREEN L F^LNICK2160 KEr#IOOD HAYH/YZATA HN 553911 j 7 pntjP AODR OltlER NAMf TAXPAYER HAKE/AODR % • PROP *00R OMNtR NAHf TAXPAYER NAHC/AOOR •I % *: fRO» AOOll OHMtR NAMf TAXPAYER NAW/AOOR P1I0R AMMI 04NCR NAMi TAXPAYER NAHC/AOOR SO l7-117-tS AI O02f 02170 KE»«DpO HAY OOrtIA E KAM^ BROqu«fN CENTER 104 5SRS0 SO 17-117-2S OR 0014 0SS4S CRYSTAL BAY RO J R LOFRAHO ETAL J i LO FRANO SS4B CRYSTAL BAY RO HAYZATA 104 SSSOl SO 17-117-25 44 00S2 OOOSO .400RESS UNASSIO«0 RENE AND SHERVll BLOCK CENE AND SHERYLL BLOCK tSOS BAVVIEH PLACE HAYIATA HN S5S91 SO 17-117-fS 44 0040 02240 BAVVIEH PL JU0UELYt04 J ZONTELII ET AL JACCX SfCNER 2240 OAVVIEH PIACB IHAVZATA MN OSS 71 SO 17-117-25 41 0050 00050 AODRE^ U4ASSIGUED DflLllA XABAf^K^ 4^1 pACLAS RO BR^LYN center ML4 55450 50 17-117-25 44 0017 05549 CRYSTAL BAY RO J B DAHLHAN IMA DAillHAN JON H PAPAS 3549 CRYSTAL BAY RO HAVZATA HN 55591 50 17-117-2 02505 BAYV] R jAL-SJELI LKaH zsdfi Bi havza T'a mu ACC SO 17-117-25 44 0041 02250 BAYVIEN PL CATHY JO TURNER CATHY JO TURNCR £014 ENCHANTED RO HOUND 194 55544 58 17-117-25 41 0051 •- 00050 AODIfESS'UNASSIOlEO 65450 50 17-117-25 44 0010 05575 CRYSTAL BAY RO JAY B KEISER ETAL JAY B KEISER 3576 CRYSTAL BAY RO HAYZATA 404 65391 05 P'ol* • ■ SO 17-117-ZS 44 00S9 02240 BAYVXEirn) JACQUCLYLLN^ Z^ELLl ET AL iyT^^wcb HN 66391 SO 17-117-2S 44 0042 02240 BAYVIEH PL 0 S HILLIAHSON ETAL 0 S HILLIAHSON 2240 BAYVUM PL HAYZATA 194 SSS.’l PROP ADOR ; • 0«€R HAHi 7 TAXPAYER . SO 17-117-tS 44 0044 00010 AOORfSS ItMSSlCNED C H PALMER • 0 J PALMER CtniS t BARBARA PAimS 17X0 CASCO PT RO 404 66191 SO 17-117-25 44 0045 0Q05B CDDMESif'ttUSSICNEO C M PALMER) *\B ^PAIMLR MkoiRAVALMER 2710 \a K0 PT RO ORQNO 494 55591 50 17-117-^44 0044 00038 AODMtt UNASSIOCO O H PALflfR n J PALME 4 lAROARA PALMER CASCO PT RO ORONO 494 66591 EATCH 00^PM? AODE ONNfll N4M€. TAXPAYER ‘ *; RAJH/ADOi ♦ . 1 1 •I'ROI' *06li OHNEtl NtHB •.‘TAXPAYtR NAHE/AODR % 4 . #• PROP. ADDR OlMi KAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR -i* ^ PIK» AOOR .. Otim NAHI 5 ' TAXPAYER NAMe/AQOR -i ‘ »• ^4 « ••nk ■ I» mr««tPlN COUNIY HhOHlMl.PROPLRTYIS 17-117-2S 44 009b 03S00 NtfARRE LA JAMUtUrtry^GNE RS^r"KAV^A PM RSSfl •2 14>117-2S 5S OOOS OSin LAPAVITTi RI06E RO C J DUNLAP AMO DUNLAP C J A N O DUNLAP S171 LAPAYITTE RIOGE RD HAY2ATA MN SSS71 R2 14-117-2S AS ODD* OSliY LAFAYETTE RI06E RO P A E HILLER PETER N A Elizabeth a miller S1B« LAFAYETTE R106E RO MAY2ATA MT BSS91 TOTAL BATCH 004 0004S o«-“* 0L' « ) r \\iBier-u V- - APR 2 • • • IIAIJU4 jlJllh LIST i'A*tS64UAPAGE 20so 17-117-23 44 0103 02240 BAYVIEH PL JACQUELYMNvJ ZONTELLI ET ALjIcci smicX2240 BAYVUH PL HAYIUTA Pfi 55391 02 14-117-23 32 00240S12B OLD COUNTY RO EOH STEARNS D0t4NA HUNTSBERCER 3128 OLD COUNTY RO 15 NAYZATA PtI BS391 62 14-117-23 33 0004 03147 LAFAYETTE RIOCE RD R A A M L FAULKP4ER ROBERT A FAULKNER 3147 LAFAYETTE RIOGE RO HirviETOPPKA DEACH PH 55341 02 14-117-23 33 OOOS 03143 LAFAYETTE RIDGE RD SAD SIMPSON STEVEPi R A OIAPC E SIMPSON 3143 LAFAYETTE RIDGE RO HIPHETONKA BEACH MN SS341 62 14-117-23 33 0007 03155 LAFAYETTE RIOGE RO BAS FREEDMAN BARRY A FREEDMAN 3155 LArAYETTE RIOCE RO HAYZATA HT 55391 B2 14-117-23 S3 0019 00082 ADDRESS UNASSIOCO LAFAYETTE RIDGE HOMEOHNERS LAFAYETTE RIDGE HQMEOPtCRS PO BOX 41 MTKA BEACH MN 55341 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESEPTTEO ARE AN ACCURliE APH HHIE REPRESEHTATIOPI OF IPiFORHATlON AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF TP4E HENNEPIN CmA4IV 0EP«RT|KN7 OF PROPER(AF TAXATION* TO THt^ST OF PIY KNOHLEOCI! ANO BELIEF. DATE * / RUN DATE 0S/S0/9t BATCH 004 MEfflEPIM comry property intorhation systemPHOPEHIY 0»«JEHS LIST REPORT MO. PI435401 PAGE 19 r PR(» ADBR OHMER NAHi * TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR IB 17-n7-tl 44 004J ^SB ADDRESS UNASSIOffOPALMER PALMER 58 17-117-23 44 004800038 ADDRESS LRTASSICHEO JACqUELYTW J\;jOfTTELLI JACCI SETJNER' 226(1 PAYVIEH PLACE HAYZATA MN 55591 38 17-117-2S 44 005400038 ADDRESS UNASSIGKIO C T (ROOD A I Dk ROOD CLAM i A lW 0 ROOD ezis V e ^bM hay HAYZATA MN 55391 i5 PROP AOOR ohttcr name taxpayer NAHE/ADDR PROP ADOR OTMER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR I* . PROP AD6R 0»«€R TIAME • TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR AOOR O.MER NAHI TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR SB 17-117-2S 44 005S BOOSB ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO C T ROOD A L 0 ROOD CLAIR T A LYM4 D ROOD tnS KENHOOO NAY HAYZATA m 55391 SB 17-117-23 44 0058 03220 NAVARRE LA RICHARD A PROUOPIT ROBERT J RITCHIE 1901 BEACH LA NAVZATA Ml 55391 SB 17-117-2S 44 OOBB 03215 LArAYETTE BIDCE CT CHEYENNE LAND CO OETPIIS H A JUK 0 BIASESS 3215 LAFAYETTE RIOGE CT MAVZAIA ftl 55391 IB 17-117-23 44 0091 03285 LAFAVETn RtOGI Ct CHEYENNE LAND CO CHSYETME LAND CQNPANY 742 THELVE OAKS CENTER 15500 NAVZATA OLVO NAVZATA m 5»S91 38 17-117-23 Hj0056 00058 AOOPtSS'WUSSICNED c t;^rooo \a 'l d rood CLAIR t/ a'^LYNTT D ROOD 221^^ENH00D nay HAYZATA TtT 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0082 02200 BAYVIEH PL DALE MATSON ETAL DALE MATSOfT ETAL 2200 BAYVIEH PLACE HAYZATA TIT 655yl 38 17-117-23 44 0089 03225 LAFAYETTE RIDGE CT JAB LARSON JOIffT T A OETTE J LARSON 3225 LAFAYETTE RIOGE CT HAYZATA MN 55391 IB 17-117-23 44 0092 03245 LAFAYETTE RIOGE CT D F BRIGGS I S J BRIGGS DAVID F B SUSAN J DRICGS 3245 LAFAYETTE RIDGE CT NAVZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 02215 KETMOOO C T ROOD B ii CUIR 22jS ^ 44 0057 NAY ROOD • • HAYZATA MN HAY 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0083 02230 BAYVIEH PL J L SCIiNECK B P H SCHNECK J I I P M SCHNECK 2230 BAYVIEH PL S HAYZ/TA !« 55591 38 17-117-23 44 0090 03285 LAFAYETTE RIDGt CT SALLY J MCCABE SALLY J HCCABE 5285 LAFAYETTE RIOGE CT HAYZATA MN 65391 38 17-117-23 44 0093 00038 ADDRESS tPMSSIGNEO LAFAYETTE RIDGE HOHEONMERS LAFAYETTE RIDGE HOMECBfiERS 1709 N FARM ROAD LOr» LAKE m 55354 %li ^-4) 0 PROP ADOR OTMER NAME taxpayer • tum/um A ‘*r. ’ . IB 17-117-n 44 0094 UNASSIGNEO U7|Vmy'a« H0ME0I*«RS MawoiB«Rs I709lN^jUBl Mao LONG LAKE Ff4 55154 38 17-117-21 44 0095 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICfffO LARAVETTI RIOCp HaiEOFtlERS lAFAYET7i,R100p IIONEOHNIRS 1709\m FARM ROAD LONG LAKE MN 55354 f- 38 17-117-23 44 0094 02 ICO OAYyXEH PL f><^CLLl ET 1L :r BAYVIfN PLACE NAVIATA »t4 55391 02 ICO OAYyXEI daAiei! I 8e»«i 22«)r^DAYVIfN PI t. •• «ri I' . |2.’6^f-,«-. fti-OoJC, t:^ilLrNA*^ iMtJ Ct^UV^y, COR|C. r<*^4^ Z " 1%!t,. UtM' MOML_y V » , «« 9 t^Mr to Avrnt « > • ^* . • ■• » : {J t>f AIM llUfc-. IT. CX^HC. r^iCM.lU6T •VfL^tAt- I'-o" TscfTH 14AV*» WNM-=>^ • Vile-HIM- *• . «l — . • f V ■ -I n' * . # ••••MM f- ] ’■ • •.•• V .■•. A‘» ‘ r- * » l'*»* l‘f.*0|CrvV|- foC_ 1*11 Alim./, lo\.-i . •• o '• *• •. • u« • *, ' »4 .• » \- I ■ «. t » *:. .•jf- t- •»: f le-f V AfltR, 1 Ct>*ir ATMAfUZ*.. EJ^w 4 !r—?-v.r3 > ‘tlM -i' ff rr-—-•—Ti ., S • ■>■r ^zrs, c-i'-H(M«*vrr. fcirr «»• G|IC*4 0 -------- ------?*i-£!iil!:J ____ 4» r f.: 4 tr» '■ 'i ■ 1 ■»l.» 1 V tSijm.'Aii£4j © .* A ' ■-, V4*'« I'-o $ P\ ;V>f ■A-.f • • • ' *♦• {•) ' tM ^v';i w*. ,.: ;<•. T.i.. . i' • •• i V t.» .• • •« I V ‘ • ^4 •( *L a • K’ » • -♦ ** >• v*«\l••• • f«W>. 4 mi © ‘t«'n l-H tr> (<» c> 6iM<^ 4*tY : A%»a: .1. TVffU H . » .^Tt;. .L -a t i ‘wt 1:^41.?* £I - iilki • • - pupCiCt-or 1<J P>T UANP • • «M • tit'n ■•xUKWTinc WAMC-6ctnrt-1t llAhC-- H- I/? c» •!•> tV» •«H.t iA»4A|%»r» KM3 rnArt R- MJ> VT»*-< J.4H WlU*aJ |ve feJt.^ Afl Iu-pe4«_ An. uiit» iwu totitiir ftoftosrp - <f K • •'o' c0UC.p4.l-. titx Ma;,.l ('nr') -------fcAT^ . z 'ta 'x Z'O* -4.* vf p<4riL_rm>if4». PmAvfOij (. Artpcx . MXAlia j.') -^ ^fy.j tfZ, l-W^. A«*^- .».w , rpf^ M«4»-.<T/ne^ HI*, (nAiFLiF- te^ic«i»i^) fATm.;! to t%-» f,c.%./ “■‘'’ : ; ! ' ,1 *3(t*t>^AU5» nA.Ct« pirnwt^fH *ijrA*. VhHM)» }. t<RN«-r iifcCiC or COMTCMIQIKl* • ♦ . • «« I, iUt^TMJU K*^ on^ew- fvAM*r ttAvie^dh^ wmuft ♦ li *. It vwpatMvi. opi»aAt mj . • •f.AiT>*;.‘ ■ ■ ‘ ' ^ I ' •• » A 4 - . . # < vi 'V>i '44 • ' « f5!13>.k ’ • '•■ H'.Vr 1;;i; vf vS , • •■ «f * ^ ,, 4 ;, i ,COFFW » OB • * 1 1 E^^lNE^S^!|yMV:irf«<i|triPwtA (. 1% ton*** t ^ f'J, .4'!. UL^- .4 • • .1, •.* .r ** #»4 u « * • t ■M' ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 22, 1991 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: (15)ZONING FILE #1604-CLAIR ROOD VA^WNC^/OTSomONAL USE PERMIT-RESOLUTION 12989 Clair Rood was present. Bernhardson provided a brief statement explaining the basis for Mr Rood's apolrcation, noting that the Planning Cor^i = “on had reco^ended '^ioproval. He informed Council Commission also recommended that ^ he’apoly isra’'^“^"r’at'’i“"ghrv"atiarcr“B';r';rhai'd^ LslJ for'^ council consideration involves the legal combination of the parcels owned by Mr. Rood. cafron exolained that the pillars, retaining walls and constitute an aicessory use and ace located on lots that ha,e no principal structure. Goetten indicated that, in her opinion, the -eauirinc: a principal structure with an accessory structure ‘ ^to Structures such as docks, barns, garages, etc. She did" not see the need to require a lot combination in Mr. Rood's case. Jabbour agreed with Goetten that a lot combination is not necessary. Mr* Rnnn stated that at some point in the future, he would like to’ buUd V hcTu'se o“ lots 54 a^d 55. but that he is not yet prepared to submit a subdivision application. H “Yutro°:l293 ’'9 ‘^:;r-ving “a“v"arfanc ’; anrcond ““on°a"l Use St-'rof=all^^it^in’a as amended to^omitPermit for excavation witnin a ’ o;»rceiscondition #11 pertaining to legal combination of the four parcels owned by the applicant. All votea aye. ^^asse-. (16)ZONING FILE i1646-TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH 2060 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH * CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-RESOLUTION #2990 Jerry Jones, an authorized representative Lutheran Church was present. for Trinity Bernhardson advised that the applicant Planning Commission had recottunendc-* approval. It was moved by Goetten, seconded Resolution #2990, granting a Conditional Use Permit f - 6 - i i * \ * * *.p S 10.03 EXCEPTION. Regardless of lot area, every developed lot allowed at least 1,500 square feet of lot coverage by principal residence and garage structures. D. Tennis courts, pools and paddocks or arenas, when such accessory structures exceed 1,000 s.f. footprint area, stall be subject to the following special setback restrictions: Front - 30» minimum and not witl.xn the required front yard nor between the front lot line and the principal structure on the property Gs’ Side - 30' minimum and not within the required side yard area Rear -30' minimum and not within the required rear yard area Source: Ordinance 72, 2nd Series Adopted: 8-14-89 Subd. 15. Non-Encroachments. The following shall not be considered to be encroachments on yard requirements; A. Chimneys, flues, belt courses, leaders, sills, pilasters, lintels, ornamental features, mechanical cornices, eaves, gutters and the like, provxded they do not extend more than 1-1/2 feet, off-street parking except as hereinafter regulat . Name plate signs for one family dwellings: lights for illuminating parking areas, loading areas or yards foi safety and security purposes, provided the direct soti^rce is not visible from the public right-of-way property may b^^ located to within five feet of the front lot line. C. Fences which do not exceed 3-1/2 feet in height, fences net over 6 feet in height along the street lot ^ frontage lota which front on a »^ajor thoroughfare, if fill is required^ the total combined height of both fence and fill shall not exceed 6 feet above the heigh: of the crown of the road, terraces, steps, uncovered porches, stoops or similar struc-ures, which do not extend above the height of the ground floor level of the principal building and extend to a distance of not less than i feet from any lot line. y D. In side or rear yards only, bays not to exceed a depth of 2 feet nor to contain an area of more than 20 square feet, fire escapes not to exceed a width of 3 feet, fences and walls not to exceed a height of 6 feet above original grade and open off street parking except for lakeshore lots, no fence of* Inches but not in excess of 72 inches in height above original grade may be located c jser to the shoreline ^^an the average ^stance from the shoreline of existing residence on adjacent lots, such fences shall not be constructed within 75 feet of the shoreline. cSource: Ordinance 9# 2na Adopted; 1-28-85 ORQNO CC 2S6-1 (4-1-84) / S 10.03 E. Rear yard only; balconies^ breezeways, detached outdoor picnic shelters and recreational equipment except as regulated hereinafter; no accessory structure shall be closer than 5 feet from a rear lot line nor shall a fence or wall constructed within a rear yard exceed a height of 6 feet above original grade. F. Side yards only; no accessory structure shall be closer than 10 feet from any side lot line nor shall a fence or wall constructed within a side yard exceed a height of 6 feet above original grade. Source: Ordinance 9, 2nd Series Adopted: 1-28-85 Subd. 16. Traffic Visibility. No fences# structures or planting more than three feet high in the "R" District on corner lots shall be permitted to obstruct traffic visibility within a triangular area defined as follows: "Beginning at the intersection of the projected curb lines of two intersecting streets# thence thirty feet along one curb line thence diagonally to a point thirty feet from the point of beginning on the other curb line# thence to the point of beginning. Source: Municipal Code Effective Date: 9-14-67 Subd. 17. Essential Services. This Zoning Chapter shall require a permit for all structures including utility poles# and right-of-ways which are an integral part of a system for public transportation# as for transmitting power, water# heat# communica tions# gas or sewage by any public utility. The Council shall grant a conditional use permit only after a showing that the public safety# health and welfare will not be harmed by the essential services. Subd. 18. Farming. 1975 shall be permitted to following conditions: All farms in existence on January 1# continue operation subject to the A. No new "stock farms" shall be created or existing stock farms enlarged more than twenty-five percent (251) over the total number of animals that existed on the farm as of January 1# 1975 with animals over one year old except under the provisions of a conditional use permit. In considering any such permit# the maximum number and type of animals to be kept shall be determined by the Council. The site design and method of operation, shall be reviewed and the Council shall find that the proposed or existing "stock farm" will not in its opinion be detrimental to the public safety and the general welfare. OROHO CC 257 (4-1-S4) >5- \ / '!r. '^^ *■ ^4. V '6r, "' '“S•'Oy ' ^Hi ^0 a . 14 / r #1 fi».Of ^4' «?N.''/•_ Ot. >, ^(7 ^ '<T,' / • ♦ t / 'V,. ^Tr*<.i-h^'‘^* ** % R e ®-'y ^ ^ ^ '.,s loe • /^ To Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Prons Date: 'hJeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administra^r , May 13, 1993 ^ Subject: #1734 John and Mary Jane Burger, 3750 Bayside Road Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing 'vg- \ Zoning Districts - LR-IA and RR-IA Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.27, Lc^ Width Required Proposed Variance Subdivision 1 (B). Variance required for Lot 1 300' 210* 90' Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (B). "Combination of separated parcels prohibited. No lot or parcel of land which is divided by a public, private or platted road or road easement which results in any segment thereof being less than the minimum acreage required for that zoning district, shall be allowed to b© combined with any separated parcel of land across the road for purposes of qualifying under the minimum acreage, open space, required yard, setback or sanitary or septic system reqvirements, nor shall building or density credits be credited or transferred between such parcels under any provisions of this chapter. Each separate parcel must individually conform to the prov,.sions of this chapter in connection with construction of improvements thereon." Applicants propose combining or connecting I.ot 1 and Outlet A aS' a single residential unit located in a RR-IA, 5 acre minimum zone. Variance to this section shall be required. Lot 1 • 2 acres dry contiguous Outlot A ■ 4.26 acres Total area • 6.26 acres dry and .33 acres wet Section 11.03. Definition 24. Lot area minimum in rural tones not served by sanitary sewer. Bach lot must contain a minimum of 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land exclusive of wetlands, public and private rights-of-way, vehicular or pedestrian easements. Proposed Lot 1 consists of 2 acres of dry buildable lind. Applicants' consultant confirms suitable areas for both principal and alternate on-site septic systems. Outlet A is proposed as merely area credit for 5 acres zoning requirements. Chapter 11 - Class IXI Subdivision. Zoning Memo #1734 May 13, 1992 Page 2 List of Exhibits - A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map ■ Sketch Plan ■ Planning Commission Minutes 9/16/91 • Staff Letter to Barrett ' Ordinance #601, Subdivision 2 • Barrett Letter 5/12/92 ■ Plan of Access to Lot 1 J - Weckman Memo/SP Testing Report K - Septic Location Sketch Lot 2 L - Septic Map Lot 1 M - nance #33, 2nd Series, Definition of LR-IA and RR~1A oning Boundaries N - Zoning Boundary Map 0 - Preliminary Plat D E P G B I Review of Subdivision Application The applicants propose a two lot subdivision. The most northern parcel. Lots 1 and Outlot A, located within the RK-lA zoning district and Lot 2 located within the LR-IA zoning district. Review Exhibits M and N, the actual zoning boundary line is located further north than the line shown on preliminary plat. Actual zoning boundary line is approximately 30' south of proposed division li/ie. Applicants no longer propose the division of their homestead portion Of the property as in the sketch plan review. Mr. Burger asks that Outlet A bo set aside as an area credit for Lot 1 on the south side of trail. As already noted in the sketch plan review, Mr. Burger has attempted to achieve access for proposed Out lot A via easements from private adjacent property owners, the City of Orono and the DNR. Ho has been unsuccessful in each attempt. During the sketch plan review, the Planning Commission conceptually approved the applicants* proposal to set aside Out lot A as an area credit for Lot 1 requiring a special lot combination being filed against chain of title of both parcels. The special lot combination will insure that upon a future 4ale, they will be sold as one unit and that Outlet A may never be sold off for development as a separate residential unit. Access was a major concern because the Planning CoosBisaion wanted to deter any further encroachment of the wetland that divided the northern parcel from the southern parcel. Applicants have achieved access via the Bayside Landing properties. Outlet B to the south side of County Road 14 completes the Burger's land holdings. Outlet B has provided riparian access to the Burger property for many years. A 66* right-of-way takes up most of the area of Outlet B. Applicants' surveyor has shown the 929.4 elevation. The Zoning Pile #1734 May 13, 1992 Page 3 limited dry land area is located predominately in the west portion of Outlot B. County Road 84 is classified as a Scenic Parking in the CMP and is approved at maximum width of 50* to 66'. The Hennepin DOT has been asked to review the plat. Staff will report on their concerns at your meeting. Lot Configuration As in the sketch plan review, applicants propose a lot width variance for proposed Lot 1 shown at a 210' width where a 300' width is required. Planning Commission members conceptually approved the width variance along with the buildability of the lot by seeking area credit of Outlot A. Lot 2 satisfies all LR-IA zoning standards. Lot 2 Required ■ 2 act js dry Proposed • Total 4.51 acres 2.9 ares dry Access Access for Lot 2 shall remain as is via County Road 84. Access to Lot 1, Review Exhibit I, shall be via Landmark Drive under the authorization of the public I’.nderlying easements granted to the City at ♦'he time of the Bayside Landing platting and, finally, via a private access easement granted in favor of proposed Lot 1 over Lot 1, Block 2, Bayside Landing. The City Attornjy has been asked for his written opinion concerning the issue of legal access to lots outside of original Bayside Landing p»*operties via the public easements granted to the City over Landmark Drive. Review Exhibits G and H. Barrett has provided a written opinion reaffirming the directives and intent of Ordinance 6.01, Subdivision 2 and other applicable law. Staff has been in contact with the attorney for Mr. Burger and he confirms that Burger has met with the authorf zed representative of the homeowner's association. Burger has agreed to a share in the original cost of the road and in the execution of an agreement confirming future owner of Lot I's share in the cost of maintenance and upkeep of Landmark Drive. As of this writing, staff has received no written confirmation of these agreements but it appears that Burger has solved the issue of access via Landmark Drive and the Bayside Landing properties. Staff will ask applicants' attorney to cosjnent further at our meeting. Septic Review Review Exhibits J, K, and L. Meckean confirms in his memo of May 6, 1992 that Lot 1 has been found to have adequate, suitable soils for principal and alternate on-site septic systems that meet all required setbacks. Staff did not require additional septic testing for Lot 2 as this property will receive sever if ordered for the area, ffeckman also advised that staff had done a review of all properties within the Zoning Pile #1734 May 13, 1992 Page 4 proposed Stubbs Bay sewer district and that this site was found to have adequate area for an alternate septic site. Outlets A and B As already noted above, the City shall require a special lot combination for Outlet A with Lot 1 and will also require a special lot combination for Out lot B with Lot 2. Out lot B shall be limited to providing riparian access or use for solely Lot 2. Because of the limited land area, the property should be limited to one dock and no permanent or temporary parking of vehicles allowed because of the limited land base. Staff will also recommend that the special lot combination for Outlot A prohibits all residential construction. This is based on the findings that emergency vehicles could not achieve immediate access to the property. Staff ReconoKndatlon To approve the preliminary subdivision application of John Burger for the property located at 3750 Bayside Road, finding that all standards of the LR-lA zoning district ar.d on-site septic code have been satisfied and grants a variance to Section 10.27, Subdivision 5 (B) granting a width variance for proposed Lot 1 based on the following findings; 1. There is no available dry buildable area adjacent to Lot 1. 2.The property was originally platted in the current configuration in 1977 when the RR-lA zoning standards were in effect. 3.Applicant has demonstrated that a residence can be installed meeting all other standards of the RR-IA zoning district. 4.A variance to Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (B) that would allow the area credit of Outlet A with 4.26 acre dry buildable parcel divided from proposed Lot 1 by the Luce Line based on the following findings: a) Outlet A is land locked and cannot achieve legal access. b) Outlet A as an independent unit does not meet the required area standard of RR-IA zone. 11 Zoning File #1734 May 13, 1992 Page 5 c)All residential improvements shall be allowed only on the contiguous 2 acre dry buildable area of proposed Lot 1. The approval of this two lot subdivision shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Applicants to provide written confirmation that Lot 1 will share in the cost of maintenance and upkeep of Landmark Drive. Applicants to provide copy of access easement granted in favor of Lot 1 over Lot 1, Block 2, Bayside Landing. Applicants to execute special lot combination recognizing the relationship of Outlot A with proposed Lot 1 that they are to be considered as one residential unit and sold as one. No residential accessory structures shall be allowed to be built on Outlot A. Applicants to execute special lot combination recognizing Outlot B and Lot 2 as one unit. The agreement shall reflect Outlot B provides riparian use and access exclusively for Lot 2 and that there shall be no parking either temporary or permanent of vehicles on this limited site and that Outlot B shall be limited to one residential dock. Drainage and utility easements along the perimeters of all property lines and 5* along the shared lot line and can be omitted wherever there are designated wetlands. Applicants must provide proof that the flowage and conservation easement was filed over the designated wetland area at the time of the platting of the Burger property in 1977. If this was not completed, the City will ask Mr. Burger to execute a new flowage and conversation easement over the wetland area. Payment of $50.00 for septic review per fee schedule to complete filing of preliminary subdivision. ar-rrM 1 v‘.x t. Zoning File #1734 June 4, 1992 Page 6Additional ExhibitP -- Hennepin County Report Dated 5/26/92Additional Comments and Planning Commission RecommendationThe Planning Commission questioned staff as to the use of a special lot combination as far as area credit was concerned. Members questioned whether the special lot combination had ever been used for the creation of a new lot. Staff recalled that the first time the special lot combination was ever used was in the major rezoning of the Windward Marine property and the redefining of commercial and residential properties on east and west side of County Road 15 and with another involving subdivisions within the Stubbs Bay area. Staff acknowledges that this was the first time it has been used in the 5 acre zoning district. Members concurred with the staff's recommendation that no construction be allowed on the Outlot A because of the inability to achieve access for emergency vehicles. Outlot A shall be retained merely for open space/area credit. Applicant reaffirmed for Planning Commission members that access was being formalized by his attorney and would be finalized prior to final plat approval. Staff also advised of the on-site septic manager's concern that the alternate septic site for Lot 1 be staked with snow fencing prior to any construction on the property. The Park Commission reviewed the subdivision at their June 2nd meeting and recommended obtaining a bike easement over 10' wide drainage and utility easement adjacent to County Road 04 and payment of cash in lieu of land dedication. The Planning Commisson recommended unanimous approval of John Burger's two lot subdivision per the findings and conditions set forth in the staff memo noted above. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission's recommendation. A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE TWO LOT PLAT IiOCATED AT 3750 BAYSIDE ROADPILE NO. 1734 MHEREASr John Burger and Mary Jane Burger (hereinafter "the applicants") on April 24, 1992, filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a two lot residential plat of property legally described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, Burger's Bayside and Lot 50, Auditor's Subdivision No. 203, and Lots 15 and 16, Block 5, Bayview Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota, (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 18, 1992 at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on June 8, 1992, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of the applicants, noting the following findings of fact: -lA Single Family Lakeshore RR-IA Single Family Rural lA Zoning District requires buildable land within each within the LR-IA Zoning .51 acres, 2.9 acres Cry 1. The property is located within the LR Residential Zoning District and the Residential Zoning District. The LR- a minimum of 2 acres of contiguous dry newly created lot. Lot 2 located District consists of a total of 4 contiguous and 1.61 acres wet. 2. Lot 1 and Outlet A are located within the RR-IA Zoning District requiring 5 acres in area. Lot 1 - 2.33 total acres, .33 acres wet and Outlet A consists of 4.26 acres dry ** for a total dry buildable at 6.59 acres. 3. Per Section 11.03 definition 24, Lot 1 meets the minimum area in rural zones not served by sanitary sewer as it contains 2 acres of dry contiguous lands exclusive of wetlands, public and private right-of-ways, vehicular or pedestrian easements. Page 1 of 5 :.*t:..... 4. Applicants propose legally combining Lot 1 and Outlet A as asingle residential unit requiring a variance to Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (B) that prohibits the combining of separated parcels for area credit divided by a public, private or platted road or road easement which results in any segment thereof being less than the minimum acreage required for that zoning district. 5. Outlet A consisting of 4.26 acres is land locked. Applicants have attempted to obtain access from the State, the City of Orono and adjacent property owners but have been unable to obtain legal access. 6. Lot 1 consists of 2 acres of dry contiguous lands and a residence can be constructed meeting all required setbacks of the RR-IA Zoning District. Lot 1 is able to sustain both a principal and alternate septic site per a report by Stephen Weekman dated May 6, 1992. 7. In the May 6, 1992 memo, Stephen Weekman confirms that there is adequate area to develop an alternate on-site septic system within Lot 2's dry buildable envelope although the property is scheduled for sewer in a pending sewer improvement project. 8« Lot 1 located within the RR-IA Zoning District can be residentia 1ly developed meeting all standards of the RK-IA Zoning District except for the required width which does not measure 300' at the 100' setback where lot measures 210'. There is no available dry buildable area to the east or west to allow Lot 1 to expand the width measured in an east-west line. NOW, TBBRBFORB BE IT RBSOLVBD, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat application of John and Mary Jane Burger for the property located at 3750 Bayside Road per survey dated May 11, 1992, by Mark S. Gronberg of Coffin and Gronberg, Inc. subject to the following conditions : 1, Access to Lot 2 shall remain as currently provided directly off of County Road 0 4 or Bayside Road. Access to Lot 1 shall be via Landmark Drive and a private access easement over Lot 1, Block 2, Bayside Landing. At the time of the filing of the final plat a , Page 2 of 5 application, applicants shall provide a copy of a fully executed access easement and covenant amendment confirming that Lot 1 will share in the cost of maintenance and upkeep of Landmark Drive. 2. Applicants shall execute a special lot combination recognizing the relationship of Outlot A with proposed Lot 1 as they are to be considered as one residential unit and sold as one. No residential accessory structure shall be allowed to be built on Outlot A. 3. Applicants shall execute special lot combination recognizing Lot 2 and Outlot B as one unit. The agreement shal 1 reflect Outlot B provides riparian use and access exclusively for Lot 2 and that there shall be no parking either temporary or permanent of vehicles on this limited site and that Outlot B shall continue to provide riparian access to homestead portion of property on Lot 2. 4. Alternate septic systems shall be staked with snow fencing prior to any construction or land alterations on Lot 1. FINAL PLAT SUBMITTALS The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the months A. RECORD PLAT drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1"»200'. Drawing to Include: a) Lot lines platted per preliminary survey. b) Dedication of "drainage and utility easements* over designated wetlands per original designation within the Burger Addition plat of 1977. c) Dedication of 66* of right-of-way for County Road 84 or Bayside Road. d) Dedication of drainage and utility easements 10* wide along all perimeter property lines and 5* on each side of internal property lines except omit at designated wetland area. Page 3 of 5 - n- »d11 B. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required:a) Title opinion addressed to the City. All ownerSf mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. b) The applicants must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. Applicants should provide confirmation of that original flowage and conservation easement taken over designated wetland at the time of the 1977 plat are filed on the chain of title of the property. If this cannot be confirmed, applicants wxll be expected to file a new flowage and conservation easement. c) Execution of a bike easement taken over 10' drainage and utility easement adjacent to County Road 84. Please contact Jchn Gerhardson (473-7357) for a copy of the bike easement. C. FEES TO BE PAID: Total Due $375.00* a) Final plat fee ■ $175.00 b) Legal review and filing fees ■ $200.00 c) *Park dedication fee - The Park Commission has reviewed the two lot subdivision and has determined that the property is not suitable for park use and will ask for a cash payment in lieu of land. The City Assessor will be asked to determine the value of the undeveloped land. The Park dedication fee shall be based on the value of 81 of the undeveloped land. Park fees must be paid at the time of the filing of the final plat. Park Commission did ask that applicant exic^te a bike easement over the 10' drainage and utility easement that abutts County Road 84. A copy of the easement will be sent to applicants by the Public Works Director. Applicants are hereby advised that preliminary subdivision approval shall expire in one year from the date of Council's approval of the preliminary plat (June 8, 1993). Pago 4 of 5 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 8th day of June# 1993. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin# City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 8th day of June# 1992# by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin# Mayor a City Clerk of the City of Orono# a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was erecuted on behalf of the City. Notary Public My Commission Expires Page 5 cf 5 ‘•I I *0- A %m S I I U'l C. !ITY O? ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION • •• •• •• ?R0P2RTY LOCATION f 4“ f » .'f‘r 4 V'W\/V» 'ite Address 3'l^n n^r<Jo. roperty Identification Number (P.I.D.) n<-//%23 z/ a^p_qS-</T-Z5 3/ qq/ lease check one - Property X abstract or _ _ torrens? ctach legal description to application. T.'.A • vv r.iri7rjT^ruAK:y vnn( I t I VW cool .iOl TOS. Phone (home)fPLICANT Neune Jomm higexj JArst« gvig6ig->- Address: 3^-7SD Eo<ag________ City: Qacijp---------TTZ-f Phone (work) a /A OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Kij^ _________ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size ^.3S ■n Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check)Residential; no. of units __ Other (specify) n^.si L^slD. Present Zoning District lA.j PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Nu.iber of Building Sites: / 1 Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density: MininuD Lot Size: _/_ _ _ Units per ^*T Acres _ _ _ _ Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land. Pro*Aosed Use: (check)Residential Other (specify) NIMINUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATj.ON 2’ P^Sliminfry^Plat^iifSraat^^ on Certificate of Sur-/ey. V ?erti?ierLopeky Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 4. As^an^lVdendum to this application, please attach a separate Ixst of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application Ic complete. - . Zoning Official’s Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ITZZr___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.'I'll IT Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer ‘ 2, Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5, Developers Agreement and Letter of credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _— FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement 4 Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) Preliminary Review (Class III & all non-residential) Final Plat Review (Class III) ♦(Plus any legal or engineering charges) Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Final Subdivision Application $200.00 300.00 300.00 325.00 + 25.00/Lot 175.00 150-00 100.00 orThe applicant hereby agrees to provide alj. reauest^ed bv the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Conraission and Council necessary to further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. lI /^cA/^ Applicant's Signature ■Date Date ittala into the City offices 25 days before the Owner's Signature __ _ __ Vr:n-«rnrc^r.iir.--M.«tino. .« •'•W - Jhird Monday of .ach Month. Appllcanta auat ba P' review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If *" an unabla to ottend 0 achedulad meeting, please make arrangmnts •" authorised agent attend In your place and to advise the Building i Zoning Office of this change j-rior to th*. meeting. l^iiATCM'iovA^W^ :s i5- Yt**-’**' '? 'BMaUnns ’*' *«S7St iVlSa,IS-117-2S 21 0t02'lyj/VjY;;WW^.' At)Tit .,/>»S7St j/,lA1SIDi KOJOHN BURCCi ITAL '■''^JOtM MntCERTAKfAYir? , ___________*|;NAMI/ArD«7^ts75i'iAY$ID« RO A .LOm'LAKEiHN BSSSB •in >-i. ■:;?<' ■ W w' B1-117-2J 21 IBIS f*ROR-Arf>R E MAMPAYfR .^^(OAVtO I SHEROKEE IISES - * ISiSI y EIIEENST. ; 'OWNER KA>« I-OH It SI. I S L USE NAHE/ASQRSASI EILEEN ST f^^HAKI RLAIN MN ISSSf *'• ’• -si ■' ' i V ■■’> •• * ■ ■ • ^ J \.ii ' ^li ;if*ll7-» zz till ArDfl Vif ttfSi ^;AOOtfSS unasstchio ^ WHfi HAHf WSTATf er^HINH ftTAXPAYtR i*;. fj^::^NAm/ADmv STATI Of HXHN CDHil <IUCI lIMi TIIAIU MtNNtPlM COUNTY PROPkKTY jUTORMATION SV5UII PROPERTY OWNERS LIST38 05-117-23 21 0005(05780 8AYS1DE RO HAZEL ANDERSON HAZEL ANDERSON 3760 8AYS1DE RO LONG LAKE HN 55354 38 05-117-23 21 0015 03750 . BAYSIDE RD JOHN BURGER iTAL JOHN BURGER 3750 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE HN 55354 58 05-117-23 22 0008 00185 LANDMARK DR BETTY HINER IT AL RICtURD P t KATHLEEN A KYLC 185 LANDMARK OR LO»^ LAKE HN 55354 50 05-117-23 22 0012 00048 ADDRESS UHASSIGNEB BITTY 1 HINER PAUL SWANSON ADDRESS IRIKNQWH 51 95-117-2S 25 BOSS tM5« *OORfS$ UNASSIGNED A H EVA’ ; I D EVANS AUSTIN H I OIAHC CVAta lAAS KIHeSVUW LA RLYHOUTU mi 5SAA7 IB BS'117-2S 24 BBAf BBB3B ADOffCSS UNASSICNEO J B NAUS • J I NAU3 JANES • I JOAN I NAUS S7lt BAVSTOf CO LQNB LAKE IM tSSSA RtPOHI NO.RACE3B 05 117-25 21 BB12 05625 EILEEN ST JOHN C PIDCEON I WITE JOHN • HASDALEN flOGEOH 10912 GLEN WILDINO LANE OLOONINCTON HN • 55451 :r 'S A.»» I • . * ■V'. . !,••! ! >'•.' i* ’ i ^ * ■‘i f ' * • *• * h * i‘ I . I 58 05-117-25 21 0014 03700 BAYSIDE RD J B NAUS I J E NAUS JANES B I JOAN E HAUS 3700 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE NN 55354 34 05-117-23 22 1010 00055 LAHDHARK DR GARY N I VICKIE J ROSS VICKIE J ROSS * 55 LAHDHARK DR LONG LAKE NN 55314 38 05-117-23 22 fOlS 00048 ADDRESS UI^ASSIGI^O^ GARY N t VICKIE J ROSS CARY N t VICKIE J ROSS 40 SHITM AVE WAYZATA NN 51341 ^ t- •• 38 05-117-23 23 4034 00038 ADDRESS UHASSIGmJI 1ST OP ANDREW NINfR CITY OP ORmO PO RON 44 ! ‘ CRYSTAL RAY HH 51315 i1 M tS-117-2S M BB7B BBB5B ASORCSS UNASSX^ra J B HAUS I J I HAUS JAHtS B I .lOAN K HAUS B7tt BAYSIDE BB LQH6 LAKE HN . SSSM '' 1 • 4 L ^ : r .-'r* * .*5 •»r ».»» A • t * ... i '• • ‘V • ■ 4 ^ v V.V tic' * t A.'it - RUN DATE 04 *'.V 5ATCM 004 y!};.' i RR6l»’*ACri :> OWNER NAMl" TAXPAYER -y >\'1NAME/ACCR- 'j ;‘ «T> ■"-’■tv- % #i, -,'V' • J PROP/AC2R. OWNER NAME- A .TAXPAYE?? NAHf/ADDR ' RROfiACCR’' , % : OWNER MAHf , '^.'‘'TAXPAYER ' .-.^NAlff/ACOt !l' V rop Tador .TAXPAYER ‘ ir'hHAHE/ADOi 1 I VC* : * iPtOPjiAOOR )';.lBwM(ri NAHt TAW AYER HJM«/Air?R \rt8p,A~» OWNER WAIN ^ J TAKPAXIR .NA«/Ar^ i• f • t% j ^ • v\.* % ■' Y r .1 . # • • ♦ •• • 1 ^ " 3« S2-llt*23 34 0915 •S7*S WATERTOWN RO 6E80A L KENNEDY ¥• i - j J * K ' . «* Rl lARRV L COOK A* * f*' * . )7kS WATERTOWN RD HATLC riAIN HN KSSlf ■ A* ■ • ! • * • *»*f,. '■ .f •f * •t > . •* • .i .■ *s'i • •’ V V-t 1. • •«• ^ •t $ii'• *t • •i •• *• • / .* t 1 ^ •rl '* .* ■• 1 .J- Vi ' *» 'f** . * *1 ■•I 1 ♦ V■ ' • 1. « m' ■ ($______________________ft)i O l«> ^i - ^_ i________________________V) ,« (\ , « ‘ '^'\J •» 1 •* i i.*? I 5 i ^ tT tf^, ■fe%1T I ,*r •• 8 • '■ •9 • •c « «•«U| ■W 9 »10 THERfSAl ■ .11 _A i .! ^ SPHI «I Tr < K i •> < *1 r s 'It f *#i i •»•S «•i P/M 1 ’H-W *5 S• I ^• i’ •» j4, }• t r u • • *■ i. 'V ■ ■ -. ,‘» - ^ • It * xaa ■cv®3 by 5cnro#aor,'nacon^#o by Mccil . to'5'r«i;0« approval O^ ippMcatton ptbnt. Ea^iar-j F. for’~:propn locatpd at 2CS0 Farvtaw Lana, fcr naraccvon and satBack/air.tbn to raconatruct 0«ck araa ana stair-ay, Ayaa 3, nays (•13) •lasa JOHN BUBMR ' 3730 BAYSXDC BOAO . ‘ 5«TCM P1.AN HCViEH • -/>V.;fl Jonn Surgar and Car Jonncsn of n^r-a** Peally war# vpcM for this application. • Maousth aiplainao that Hr. Ourgor propcsas a Vtttrio^;; subdivision. Lots A and B ara -itnir. tho Lfl“iA. 3 bcra j Z5.T) district and Lott C plus C! aro -ith*n tha P»-iA, • 3 aerji^on district. Lot C Is iccatod on t"a north slO« of tha'tuco^l^ Lot Cl Is proposad as tha building sito. using Lot C forj^r^ to «oat tho 3 acra roqulrowont. Lot C: 13 2 scrai^» , ahtfi' tha 2 aero cantigucus standard for rura f lots. Hr, Bu^ar aiacuta a siaciai lot conomation to canbino both lotsJ».,LQt.;.-C tha north sifla aculo novor l*a huHt upon. H ItMh savaral yaars. Mr. Rurgor has triad to gain acc8 88.„4:i^';ri hortnarn lot. But to no avail. Lot Cl aill naad 1 wl0tf»~V#fi, as tha lot only naasures 210'. r%«- a * i. fr Sh« ’ wtnt on to oipljin tnat tno cutjotvfsion aa:prop« protJtntid fti H It lioro • oowor^o property, nn, SQoutng crocit of tho «otl:ind aroo. Cho asKod t^o Co»iiY9ifon thoy would considor tho suDdivttion fco!:dd on dona tty crtdiW * a aiwartd propii-ty, onp condition tho pro! tiiinary • tuQtftv^ approval duojoct to availability of ao«or In tha futura,^^ notad that thii preoarty ha^ always boon tncludad In tho'pTd'pP aaworad district,.» < , -v^CCT'N Howlatta askad if this preporty la Includad \2^<fv!.;4:^ aoratorlu"*. ~t, .<.-f ' ^7l8f K¥; . -V: * /’I .V' • tal L* r. '• HjbuSth agroo^ thit tho scut ha *r portion of th«prop<>rty* Included within tha aoratorlua. tho notad that HOa ^BurgarChat Just racalvad con:»ant of an ownar within Bayatda Landing an accass aasaaant to hie proposad Lot CISC. Up-Untt>^, 'has not baan aoia to obtain any typa of accass aasaa»anS Cohan fait that tho aoutharn portion .aVicHjId bV'jia until aawarls approvad for tha araa, but had probTg north;-n lots. * - •• -i • - -•■t Johnson- rotod that tho'»or»torlu» rostr ‘m V! Habusth ovplairod thot'poopio con ppply''for tho acrotarlus lY thoy can provo that tho ouotfIvislon'V lapactod by tno shorolond rogulotlons proposad.. . BM point. 00 oould to doaling vlch tho proparty locittd th praS'i • f ? i 1*^1 * >1 #« vjrf,J -1 • .f... VrVfeo mm • V ♦» - > >t V V-*4* Lttll r-svv.^-, •* -r.'A:-:::"*»v-A .vfr-. ''.-i ••s •I. .*«“»*■' .-T^ li r?-*\^iH«ou*th thitv UgA\ v^cciis .t» Lot, ClrAfOuTd.^i •pprovod prior to final plat'approval, and Lot ClivouTa D) building piv/olopa »1tn no accaso avatTaolt to Let c.' /" ‘ .‘••I- •'■»‘.—*Oan -Johnson folt that It wou’fl D* th, futurt ounort.-sr Cl and C*s rasponsibt 11 ty to datormlna prior to purehaio<<; aotlltiao to gam accaoo ovor tna tuco umo. ^ .«jv>'jr^n , V - - ^ U’SCohon had a proolow approving tno uaa of Lot C for;^^^ for Lot Cl as you could navor usa that portion of ‘propart/^^ anything, ' / 1 ^ Johnson askad about ro::cn1rg lot C;. ^ » Mabusth notod that thoy or'gmat’y did net rnmna portion Cocauso th«y did net -ant to croata higror danait/'i’? " this aroa. Cchroadar suggostod tnat Lot Cl Oa rironod to 2 aerti^O^r ifith tha provision tnat Lot C b« glvun tnu park. * C has very llttla va^uo to anyenu buying tho proporty* . ^ ‘^^>cJ?SRiu5SHi V ^Burger notod that tho roari^ot valuo on that ploco 1s and ho pays about t800 par yoar In taxot. Mo notod thab^h originally bought thy preporty olth tho Intent of a PL'O# 'houpy# that novor natoriaMjad. a’ao had thought Lot C ftay be for thy suptic tystom for Lot Cl If thy DMR oould grent.;2«^i^iii^ temporary building oasonont o.or tho Luco Liro, Burgor ^ that ho could dodicato Lot C for narv ufio. but ho k-ouM ^ wm .r'-v- *ir/ SOnu WOU1C CO enrougn tno nohocynor^ private \.OfT iihfch ec. J ulinjinatii thy nood for a drivo across the wet tendkVw^-w8® -V / ^ ij-r C3h«n notod that ho oould not apprnvd' jA •'^sub^.f ccr.lingont upon tho availability of 5»wtr^ ■ . » ^ Burgor noted that if h* cannot go ahoad and pvirchai access oasonont which <5 now avaliabli to hin, he wouUMie build a drive across tno wetland In the future. r.' rather not do that. Johnson* felt that density credit should be given for Lot C. ^ . . w.wr Hebusth asked If the Coemission vculcf approve-\e^f variance for Lot Cl If approved. . Cohen noted that he would grsht such a verlence. noted that two nemoers of the Conetsslon were absent. :-v :l rllrai i^'v y:*.f** I t" I... - ~ j , r '■ •’Si'-.*'? - j'V* ?".'V • « t, ^.i ^n-l :T<f.:y^-i.iB^iaa i^iayga^siiieiaa r•> -.< ^ 5ll^ ’ •i' ii"' "K • ?W/V-f, -.-;/• . • . i -' "o-^« ,6• «*•«* •* «*'' Rowitttt* Advts«(} that «n«n towar tt AVAf lAbIt., '.'VI crocHt for ,lot AroA. .> . ,. . , ~ ■ • . • * Contn not AO ' that ha would apprava tha Aubdivfiffl ■ji Tr ..SAwar bocAfliA AVAllabiA. -»*»• N. » --ir'v ^vi. PowlAttA AgroAd »fth CohAn or.d notAd tnAt'ano^Woul rlv^ C bAing davAlopod AS ona lot, . If lt-h..»of writing that thoy can nAvar, navar ba subdIvIdAtf. tha-i Always raaaln 3 acros, and building wust navar pa AlTo nortnorn portion. *'- 'V • \ r * , < * I •• • A-»».■ 5'.* -. — >4 Da Johnacn r#ooat«d that thii Coaifiiasion vcu Td^CO subdivision of Lots A ana B. sutjjact to sawor avanabilftm . V‘" *v.. I". Tho Commlaslon acroad. ".• r;v ••■.... • .*■ •• • °* Johnson want on to not# thay would agrao to\'«M '- of Lots Cl and c to boccno ora davolopania lot. Jv-.-; ■-• Commission Agraad and thay notad tha bul)dtng’’>l i-Sv'ir. to ba on th# couth aida of tha traeiia. ... 'jf'-;*-'/* (t*<) fthCAT ir Pl.ANNINQ COMMISSION RCPhlStNTATiV* mwm Hr* Cah#n atto.'d#d lh« maat^ng i^d hid noth 1 ng lo• mr i i * • ■>■ .(il3) LAlt USE CC»«MITTtl RIPCRT Mm -m d •% r ^ Vi*" ^ r# ‘yi^' V ^ •= ;• ..chroooar njtnrt ‘.hoy havo C3ntln;./,ii ♦ .i r..i,-«> m<>at 1r'gi'*in;y ’'‘<'>-’•. a< /•; • • , Invitoa anyonj to attorj, ,d*/' A »*,;•;' . . ‘^.4'“ *" (il«) PEPOBT By rAClLITIES rc»>ilTTS6 Oii-- •^ '’ f > • ' Haousth Invited awarycna to t hold on Tuasdays at 5:00 In Vha Oro Hoo» 107L. .... i (fl7) 0TM£B issues • ' : ' ,r>,-V Oaffron . askad JrJtha ;^';Co«*!A»'1an '■**' 4***l'tionAr '.'vAr tanew-to •-; Driwa,'. .• .Ha awpiainad T^aff ownar. . • . - . . , .7U« * * • , I . , *r:• >' # ' • % ** '■ , V'"* .f'.•'V* .• V . . • . 4 « ... . « ' V.-’* ; a * ' • • , a ^ » • • • ♦* • • ‘f 1 * .* .• • ** •»%* 'aP ^ f-9 *t •; ;• ... :.-;i ssr^'*'- ■!! ■'* m »' •* " ^ f .aJ *• •- ‘ w r. /01 Ov rii May 1/ 1992 CITYof ORONO MunidpEiJ Ofllcci Post Office Box 66 Crysol Bty, Minntaota 55^23-0066 Tom Barrett Pophanir Balk 6 As-ociates 3300 Piper Jaffray Tower 222 Ninth Street South MinneapoliSf MN 55402 pi?. Anolication ^^1734 “ John and Mary Bur^®^ , alio Bayside Road - Preliminary Subdivision Application Dear Tom; During the preliminary -oM^Trs'^ c^cern-^^ achieving access via a ^ access via‘the Landmarkdesignated wetland that applicant of the subdivision to the immediate west rofds with ordinance amendment that would allow p a^o«c<; to all underlying public easements to not only provide nnLs Jithin the subdivision but the = adjacent properties to achieve reasonable access via the pubii easement. Please p"rivat?driv^ai-nr«senn« tSniSgh SSri” "c\n“ri ^B^ocb 2, Beyslde Lancing. Steff has^ been advised that the current applicant has asked appropriate private “==”* *V*irnritIng th^ Drivethat the City Attorney reaffirm in writing taau can be used as access to proposed Lot i. Please contact my office if you M^y Planning Commission ^eiot Sf \our no later18th meeting. Staff must be in receipt or yout v than May 13th. Sincerelyr 7-') ✓ • • Jeanne A. Mab ’inth Building fc Zoning Administrator in > - 47^7357 • F%X-47M>^I* JAM/lSV CrT 770S3INAIIC2 NO. /7, by ^co ^ot^g PsivTrs''o;^bs''^o S °=BY COJl£'-l-i-A-’« ^ phIYATS HOAI3 TSS CITT COroCIL 0? =32 01=3 O? OP.OHO 020AISS: section 1. section 6.01, subdivision 2 of tbe Munic-.pal ,, ua-.-v arae-ded bv adding t.ba adder.dati sante.nce code of Orono is hers-y arae..ce- . described below: All ccivats ?®a?!®Vr.vitL3"anrto‘airpeoola S^riou?d“nslnably;be%Wed^to_usa^t^^^^ » to their private residences and -«e.- -- section 2. =bls ordinance shall be published in =he Lake A euan e-'***ctive upon publication, and fhe Pioneer and shall -e e-^ — U S. OFFlCtS: OtNVCM. COCOHAOO TtL 901 S93-1200 Miami . FlOMiOA TC l 909'ftl0 0090 WAftMiMOTON. O C. Ttw aoi-s«isToo S U ITS 3 300 222 south Ninth stssst MINNCAFOLIS. MINNSSOTA 5S402 TCL 6 1 2 333-4800 FAX 612 334-6868 Thomas J. Barrctt , C so. DtRCCT DIAL <612) 334-2676 May 12, 1992 iNTCANAnONAW O^^tCXX LCI«>I>0. acNMAMy TXC 0II37-41-4SIS47I STurroAPrr OIA mamt TCt. Ot I4S-71 1 29490J FT: ♦ 1 .• « r l.'r' if ! 1 ’ *- VTA FACSIMILE OWIGIliAL TO FOLLOW BY MAIL MAY 1 5 Jeanne A. Mabucth ... Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Municipal Offices p.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-006 Re: Application No. 1734 - John and Mary Burger 3750 Bayside Road - Preliminary Subdivision Application Dear Jeanne: In response to your letter of May 1, 1992 with respect to the application noted above, I point out that Orono Ordinance 601 subd. 2 specifically allows the City to regulate Ptlvatf toads by allowing access over them to other persons who could reasonably be expected to use the toad to get t> their home and to their invitees. As I understand it the potential intensification of the use is probably limited to oca or two home, -h.ch may use the private toad inaccess. The alternative access which has been v-xsuusseo with respect to subdivision would require, as you point out in your letter, a long and lengthy roadway through a designated wetland. I also understand that we can look forward to the new users agreements to share in their prorata costs of the maintenance of the road. Thus, I conclude that the proposed use of Landmark is reasonable under the circumstances and consistent with both our ordinance and other applicable law. TJB/jao/MTTis m -H»-fte-m^—i-u r *** /•V ».? 1 i r 14 r.-4 -i >/j-a 1 - ^.in»•>1 ///•m /W 'f/A,. atB TO;Jeanne A. Kabusth, Building and Zoning AdiTtinistrator FROM: Stephen Weckman, On Site System Manager DATE: May 6, 1992 SOBJECT: Subdivision #1734, John Burger - Septic Review I have reviewed the proposed septic system testing and design for this property and would make the following comments. Parcel C Depth of seasonal saturation (mottling) is 1' 2" to 2' for both primary and alternate drainfield sites. Slope at both sites 1 to 3%. Percolation rates average 13.8 minutes per inch at 12 inches due to shallow seasonal saturation. Both sites require mound drainfields. Topographic location and site drainage is adequate All setbacks meet city code. Based on the above soil l"‘otma^°3^^ V'b'eiroo^Vo°m"; both drainfield sites ate adequate to ,nd ...u., ..1 “i"’ drainfield site to assure compact this sits. Sn^“:^e7c^in\^UVre^i^ipi;ou\r -- prior to the issuance of a building permit. Parcel A/B This lot has an %\”Vs‘'uVt.d‘as c",'”’Vnf o'm^r treatment system. The , h, functioning adequately atcompliance and the system appears to be tunc, ining w this time. * = ‘•r;;j'^*'ur/requ^^ *>•Stubbs Bay area and if app-o „i*.hin 15 months of sewer hooked up to the sewer or llItTs rejected, the ,y.liability. If the propo.ed indicate, that an rr.in.::%^ViVn.ir:it7i",‘!’Jk:Iy avail.^l. for thl. r...d.nc.. ^ • S-P TESTING, INC.Steven B. Schirmers — MPCA Cert. No. 627 951 Katydid Lane NE • St. Michael, MN 55376 • (612) 40^.3566 April 14, 1992 John Burger 3750 Bayside Parcel C Orono, Henn. Co., MN 41 // ( This On-Site Sewage Treatment System is Designed for a Type l,five bedroom home in accordance with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Chapter 7080 and local ordinances. The soils on this site are SCS soils mapped - L.mfl - Lerdal Ic^a.i. A seasonally high water table was locatad it 14” to 24", (mottled soil). Due to the seasonally high water taole, a Pressurized mound Syste.m will need to be installed. The bottom of the roc.k bed must be located at least 3' above the seasonally high water table. The soils at a depth of 12" have a percolation rate averaging 13.8 min/inch and are adequate for treating septic effluent. A pumping chamber will need to be installed to lift the effluent to the treatment area. The manifold and supply line pipe must have back drainage to the pumping chamber. The distribution pipes shall have their ends capped. Be sure the rock and sand fill material are clean. The sod layer below the entire mounded ai'ea must be turned over, just break up the sod, be sure not to ovet work. The power supply and switches must be located outside the manhole and pumping chamber in a weather proof enclosure. A warning device must be Installed with a light and sound device, this is in case of a pump failure (Mercury floats are a good method). All neighboring wells are located greater than 100' away from the proposed treatment area. CONT'D John Burger 3750 Bayside Parcel C Orono (2) Keep all heavy equipment off of the proposed treatment area before and after construction. The treatment area should be marked off before construction. This Design is not valid & the System will need to be relocated if failure to protect the areas proposed for On-Site Sewage Treatment occurs. With proper installation and maintenance, this system should have no problem in treating septic effluent effectively. Nothing other than gray water, ( laundry, showers, etc.) human waste 6 toilet tissue should be disposed of into the septic tanks. Garbage disposals are not recommended. Additives must not be used, they may cause harmful damage to your septic system. Recommend to pump your tank every year if you have 1 tank & every 2 years if there are 2 tanks. S£_ i C'Cl:Steven B. Schirmers SBS/ds S .1i'/it i".v..:!.*;.)[;ifev^H ’ .* Aiv;Yvy.r iINSPECTION MECOMU PUMPOUT RECORDDATECOMPLIANCEDATE GALLONS j LOCATIONSKETCH//-/r-77 /A^iTM^LAnt*^ ll '2.~ 2- AiO ^urlF^CIf'JG AJcj-rt:‘f^ 6Z2\^e> JSJQ. I r i (r?S^] lly S,Xr.iMyI * r.-o'. Mt' |..:% Si.y v»v ;.♦ 1'. .. 5 • . ,•iy \ • . • *'• • ’ • w\,. v:• a a . • ii ••# *•> •Vi'- f * V. a y, *•.'/#> I I i V # y fiJj l ’ • » Inclui t ! ' 'S i';. ■:* •• • • » • ' • K'»» ■ • ^.•! * t ■ •?v‘- I •• •:* '; ••. • -f. C CONfOnMiNO S - SUBSTANDAnO N - NONCONKjRMiNG I O WtlllociHon 21 Ditttnct from houtt to ••ptfc tar^kt. dial. boK« and dram I laid 3) Nufth aitow and road ^AtSlOc=^ ^ •. .v.*i •■ - ...,4 -.v>. ^ . •• . •* Vv<v' •-... •*.*; r -. , • ;V’ • .. * .V •V t -u /•V‘%• > V' . • *. ; /-.oeuT*^ -<.iK»J Scale :F^arcoiolion Testk XSoil Born}* (9 Bench Mark Nqw Th« cytient • to be conemictod lo mee! the Mnnetalo Pokuinn Coi*al Age«y ' Chapter 7080 a local Ordinance pnOPCRTY nr gMgy»«feT- r^ocTn I* * * % Note t Check all underground utilities S-P ^SmG INC. O^gned By- ^ SM l^^lwr TV • • • • Dow PM 6C-W-356B • ito • . .♦-r ♦ " .............'.ir'-r ■■’*', '' -'V* •.*• '• ORDINANCE NO. SECOND SERIES An ordinance to amend the Municipal Zoning Code of 0-:ono by tedescribing the legal descriptions of certain properties within the BK-IA and LR-IA Zoning Districts of the City. The City Council of the City of Orono Ordains; The Municipal Code of the City of Orono is amended by adding Ordinance No. 33 » Second Series: Section 1. The Municipal Code of the City of Orono is amended by amending the official Zoning Map and Zoning Use District Boundaries for certain properties within the Northwest Quarter of Section 5, Township 117, Range 23 located within the RR-IA and LR-IA Zoning Districts as follows: RR-IA - Commencing at the Northwest corner of the City of Orono: thence Easterly along the North line of the Corporate Limits to the interaction o'^ the North line and the center line of Wayzata Boulevard! thence Southeasterly along the center Boulevard to the center line of Wayzata Boulevard ® Road; thence Southwesterly along the center 1^ to its intersection with the center line ^^e Luce Line^^ fhence Northwesterly along the center line of the Luce Line x..ail t the Westerly line of the Riedel 1 Company Stubbs Bay Addition thence Southerly along said line 283.68 feet; thence Westerly - feet parallel with the Northerly line of Section 5; thence parellel with the West line of Section 5 t° the center line of Lad; thence Westerly and Southerly along the center line Road to the Corporate Limits of the City of Orono; thence Northerly along said Corporate Limits to the point of beginning. LR-IA - The following described property in Cections 2, 4, 5' 9, 10T"!1 , 15, 16, Township 117, and Sections 25, 26, 35, and 36, Township 118, Range 23; All of the South 1/2 of Seccion 2 lying Southerly of the Burlingtor. Northern Railroad EXCEPT that which is within the City of Wayza. . That part of the South 1/2 of Section 4 lying Westerly and Southerly of County Road No. 84. All that part of the south 1/2 of Section 5, Township 117, lying easterly of Stubbs Bay, Northerly of Northeasterly of the channel between Stubbs Bay and Max'well y. Thar part of North 1/2 of Section 5, Township 117, 23 consisting 1 2 3. 4. 5. 6, and 8 of Bayside Addition, aH f, Park, Ottoville .nnd pl ocks 1 and ?, Hillside Park, Block ^ j Company Stubbs Bay Addition and the South 550 feet of ^ » Burger'^ Bay&ide Addition. ^ • A • /*-jV section 2. This Ordinance shall be published in the Laker S Pioneer Newspapers and shall be effective upon publication. T ejV • •» 9- #QUnGERS BAYSIDE SECOND ADDITIONPROPOSED SUBDIVISION forJOHN BURGEROF lOT 1 BLOCK L BUHGLR S BAYStOI QT SO. AUD SUB t«0. 203. A LOTS 15 A 16. BLOCK 6. ft.*. VIEW PARK HENNEPIN COUNTY. MESQ s OTA "■ • . ' -Wm. /I .ViuV..'. //.'//a/;* / ••• . • • ' . . . Vv\x\\ '-'j'r ^ / .*/ • / ' . ) .' • • * ' “ ' / /': . A .9 v:\\t • I / .' ^ # •\A, • r# ••...A B - \ T \ ^ Q JOHN BURGER icmA iMf« imMn • • 1 M m4 • » • • ^ — ' .1. V* ^ 4 • .i r HENNEPIN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 320 Washington Avenue South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468 PHONE: (612)930-2500 FAX (612)930-2513 TDD: (612)930-2696 MAY May 26, 1992 Jeanne A. Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Dear Ms Mabusth: RE: Proposed Plat - Burgers Bayside 2nd Addition CSAH 84, North side, approximately 780' west of Stubbs Bay Road Section 5, Township 117, Range 23 Hennepin County Plat No. 1996 Review aind Recommendations Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require County review of proposed plats abutting County roads. We reviewed the above plat and make the following comments: - For future improvements to this segment of CSAH 84 the developer should dedicate an additional 7' of right of way along CSAH 84 making the right of way 40' from the center of CSAH 84. - No additional direct access from this plat to CSAH 84 will be permitted by Hennepin County. - All proposed construction within County right of way requires an approved utility permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to, drainage and utility construction, trail developiMnt, and landscaping. Contact our Permits Section at 930-2550 for utility permit forms. - The developer must restore all areas disturbed during construction within Comty right of way. Please direct any response or questions to Les We. gelt. Sincerely, MW. Oennis L. Hansen, P.E. Transportation Planning Engineer DLH/LCWtlw HENNEPIN COUNTY on equal oppofHjnily ernpJoyef Tot Froms Dates Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator X -0. X / Jeanne A. Mabusth^ Building 6 Zoning Administrfil^^ ^ Subject: #1736 Gregory C. Peterson, 1920 Shoreline Drive - Re^l^l May 13, 1992 Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IA, Single Family Lakeshore residential, unsewered, 2 acre minimum requirement Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B), Request for renewal of lot width variance granted in 1989 and 1990, Required ■ 200' at the 50' front street setback line Existing - 30' Variance “ 170' or 85% Diet of Exhibits - A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property owners List D - Survey E - Resolution #2829 Description of Request The original owners of 1920 Shoreline Drive, Ronald and Julia Prineas, have sold the property to the applicant, Gregory C. P»terson. The applicant has applied for a renewal lot width variance and proposes no change from the original application. Applicant plans to build on the undeveloped lot within the next year. The conditions of the approval resolution. Exhibit E, included no other variances to required LR-lA standards, a specific location for the approved building envelope on the property, and no variance to hardcover requirements. The lot was approved for access via a separate driveway to County Road 15. Staff Recoaraendation Staff recommends approval of the second renewal lot with variance application for Greoory C. Peterson per the findings and conditions outlined within Resolution ♦28'*9, Exhibit E. Zoning File #1736 June 2, 1992 Page 2 Additional CoHnents and Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission members were concerned that the new owner and applicant be aware of the standards for development of lakeshore properties noting that the previous approvals were based on all standards of the LR-lA zoning district being satisfied. Applicant advised that he did not have formal building plans at this time and was not sure of the applicable lakeshore standards. Applicant was encouraged to work with the Orono staff at the time plans were being developed for future residential construction. Please review Exhibit D. Note survey shows property's boundaries extend to the shoreline. Property measures approximately 20' in width. There is no record of any previous discussion concerning riparian access. Applicant should be advised to contact the LMCD if a dock is to be constructed on the lakeshore portion of the property to determine if residential dock is to be limited to the specific number of slips and if variance review would be required. The enclosed approval resolution has been amended to now cover notice to the applicant of the need to consult with the LMCD prior to the installation of residential dock. Note the condition also states that a Certificate of Occupancy must have been issued for residence on property before City would issue a building permit for the construction of the seasonal dock. Because of the limited land area of the lakeshore portion of the property, no permanent structures except for a dock will be allowed. The current approval resolution has been amended to also exclude the requirement of a park dedication fee payment. In fact the resolution of 1990 should have been amended to exclude such property. It was the City Attorney's opinion that the new park dedication fee ordinance did not require existing lots of record to make payment of park dedication fee at the time of an application for building permit. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission recommendation with the additional conditions as act forth by staff above. Isv A RBSOL3TION GRMITIMG A RENEWAL VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) PILE #1736 WHEREAS, Gregory C. Peterson (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the property located at 1920 Shoreline Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Exhibit A, attached (hereinafter "the property")? and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a renewal variance of a variance application that was approved by the City in I9«9 per Resolution No. 2650 and in 1990 per Resolution No. 2829 to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of « single family residence on a lot that measures 30' at the roar ot the front street setback line where 200' is required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Crono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1736. The property is located in the LP-IA, Single Fatally Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 2 acres in area anci 200' of required lot width at the front street setback line. Th property has 2* acres in area. 3.The Orono Planning Comnission originally reviewed this application on May, 15 1989 (Application #1410) end recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings: A.The lot area exceeds the niniaum 2 acre dr. bulldable acre requirement. B.A feasible building envelope exists in addition to primary and alternate drainfield sites which have been tested and approved for use. Page I of 6 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. C.The hardship to the property lies in its extreme narrowness at the point where the defined lot width is measured. Furthermore, there is no adjacent land available for purchase that would increase the defined lot width to the 200' minimum standard. The Hennepin County Department of Public Works has verified that the County will approve a private driveway access onto County Road 15. Although the property contains a feasible building site, that site is limited by narrowness of the lot and by the designated drainfield sites, hence careful site planning will be required in developing the property. Therefore, it is appropriate that a diagram of the building envelope and drainfield sites be filed with this resolution to make future potential buyers of the property aware of the site limitations. (Refer to Page 6 of this resolution.) The City Council originally granted this variance in 1989 per Resolution No. 2650 and in 1990 per Resolution No. 2829 and finds no changes from the original findings of that resolution. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprchensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 2 of 6 i CONCISIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants a renewal variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of a single family residence on this lot that does not meet the required width at the front street setback line measuring 30* instead of the required 200', subject to the following conditions: 1. Any proposed residence must meet the required minimum setbacks established for the LR-IA zoning district and must further meet the required setbacks from drainfleld sites. 2. A diagram of the building envelope and approved drainfield sites are enclosed as Page 6 of this resolution, to adivse future potential buyers of the property of the building site limitations. 3. Any proposed residence or d /elopment of the property shall meet the hardcover requirements of the LR-IA zoning district. 4. No other zoning variances for development of this property will be granted. 5. The approved access for the property is a single driveway at County Road 15. 6. A building permit for the construction of a residential dock on the lakeshore portions of this property shall not be issued until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued for new residence. Based on the limited land area on the lakeshore portion of the property, the City will permit no other permanent structures except for a residential dock and the temporary storage of dock factions during the winter months shall be discouraged. Applicant is further advised to consult with the Minnetonka Conservation District to determine if variance setbacks are necessary for the location of the proposed dock and if there shall be a minimum of slips allowed for dock. Page 3 of 4 7.Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant^ but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval^ or this variance will expire on that date (June 8, 1993). 8 Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 9.The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 8th day of June, 1992. ATTEST: r Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Gregory C. Peterson ulianne H. Peterson STATE OP MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 8th day of June, 1992 by Barbara A. Peterson « Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor 6 City Clerk of the City of Grono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said Instrument was executed on behair of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 6 • ••• * >•• •• •.- > o H i /I t Pf2lMAAJ; DCA/fJP/G'it* Sire . - #^# B ? AM K^Ai/Vre* 'DeUrA»/7t I/i SI f r > • S>c A l5? /*®/o6* . • s»Aieu^ f^7 .UIK A J A^I ociau 's 2.2.7 • '' li frX/((6»T )§ J^e^OI-UTIOAj A-^o . Skoxch ©f T3u,iMAnr g-Mvt ,9 ove' [bpAf.jf/cLi> I I .. i i • . f* * I Sires I* • *• 'ri I. I • ! I*- '••Siiitr II ■ *•'? .• il;: • •. ii •1 PcgcriptiofU TrnctB A and n, nGcjiaterod Lninl Uurvoy n>. 9G, S'l.Ion of Hot|laUrar of Titloa» County of Itonncpln^ ' ' and that pact of Lot Six (6) lylnq nouthwontncly of a lino drnvin ncroaa aald lot parallel to and 105 feet Northeoatocly from tho SouthwooUarly lino of oold lot. Auditor's Subdivision Number 356, Hennepin County, niimcooto, nccordiiuj to tho map or plot thereof on fils and of record in tho Office of the Uoqlntrar of Tltloo of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Together vlth nn casement for rood purpoaoo over tho Wpotorly 20 foot of Lot 5, Avidltor'a Subdlvlalon HunOaer 350 Hennepin County, Mlnnosota. EXHIBIT A HESOLUTION NO m • • • • » ••• «»•- j. ^ • ‘‘Mi'*’si\v'•‘Sii t i‘ I • •..•Vvi f «•*, • • •>. • I <*( of lleniiepLn« •Ilel to liion and of ith«r %fith iIqd Hutrbttr 3b V CITY OF ORONO — VARIANCE APPLICATIONInitial Application Fee $175.00($50,00 per each additional varian^^^Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 //(no change from original application)Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) |0 Attach legal description to application if not included on required surve]^ Date Property Acquired V^Oy . \ --------(month/yea ) I (do)<GonSS^ also own the adjacent parcels of land. CITY OF OliiJriO 1510200000 check TinEOEIP'l-TH^HK YOU 4240290 cool POl, Tll:v I j j / :•*VT/ i,T/ / . Present use of property; "^oSj^xesidential Zoning ^>^ starlet; 1_ V nhher(specify) icVCtvrO applicant Name Phone (home) 1 Address OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (wor)c) X^Sl (tm Phone (home) Phone (work) Address; _ _ _ _ _ _ Zip: description OF request Describe request in detail Estimated Construction Cost $ : V^; vt oit^ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area X Lot Width Setback: _ _ Front _ _ Hardcover __ _^Lot Coverage Side Rear _ _ Average Lakeshore Other (specify) BARDSHIP/DBSCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL property CONDITIONS fescrlbe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual pr p V conditions presenting cgmpli^nce .<Sy- p O S--- Si fcY V cvtvi^___J (attach additional sheets if necessary)REQUIRED SUBMITTALSAll of the following information must be atibmitted by the application deadline date in order for yoar application to be considered completes1. J Completed Application Form^_ _Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtainthis list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center• 348-3271).^_^Plat Map (obtained with property owners list).4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8Jj"xll” for reproduction). 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8%"xll"). 6. _.S)cetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%”xll"). 7. V As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. / Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above Information has not been included. — Mk mm mtm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm ^ •m mm mmm mm mm mm mm mm mm mmt mm mm mm tmm mm mm mm » mm mm im- mm «m» mm mm mmm • • mm mm w APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and cofrect to th^best of his/her knowledoe.^1-Applicant's Signature Date 0W?TERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature ^ ^Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants aust be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning CossLlssion and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building t Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. If .' '<tSlw> r'■’ HUM DATE Ia’- ,- ".‘batch 004• 4^ . jL^WP AOOB f#OMNER NANC; ;^5taxpayer' v V NAm/AODl.' • ' Vl't: • • •' '•■•i 'PIW AOOR•''' to»#«ll NAHIf! • :„TAXPAYER ^ NAK/AODfV?.- < PROP ADM OHNER NAN TAXPAYER ‘r*? NAME/AODi . ■rfi ■>& ' 7^ /I •r I;» t* »A« ^ ♦^ . «•' *f' ' * 4 * *‘ : ^^ftUK DATE 04/2l/n »?- •, ,, BATCH 00*.■ -V -■ *:;^:<-^^ ■' I •> SB lO-lir-lS 11 00021JHj;j(.I»W» addb ' .ooosa aoobbss unassigheoNAME -NCLiOO CMTY REO RAIL AUTH ‘^^TAXPAYCR DAKOTA RAIL’INC v '^ NAMC/AOOR <25 A0AH5 ST N ti 1 K HUTCHINSON m 5SS50^ lUNJK.M4. «» •.NUTCNINSQN m>,S •I ;^P90P ADOR •V VONNER NAHE» ^TAXRAYIR ’ALAN NETTLES A ANNE NETTLES LNAME/ADOR 4 ITAO SHORELINE DR I ,. . ,/ NAYZATA m 55S51rSO 10-117-2S A2 0007 OlOAO ' SHORELINE DR A R NETTLES A A T NETTLESnv-, ->* NAYZATA mV.k ^ %f P«» ADCm /ONNEi NANI SB 10*117>2S 02 OOIB 01900 .SHORELINE OR N A NELSON A J A NELSON K NORRIS A/JACBUELINE A NELSONr^/AXRAYER - - - - - -r NAHE/AOOR 1900 BMORELIND OR4 I'iil ; NAYZATA HN. 5SS91 ■ ■■ '• ■> -‘i * -V= *’ • HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INTORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OI'»«RS LISTSB 10-117-23 02 0005 019S0 SHORELINE OR R C STIERNA SPA STIERNA ROCERT C A PATRICIA STIERia 1930 SHORELI^(E DR NAYZATA EM 55391SB 10-117-23 92 0019 01920 5H0RELIK« DR G C PETERSON A J H PETERSON GREGORY A JULIAEt« PETERSON 1355 ARBOR ST NAYZATA HN 55391SB 10-117-23 92 0019 01950 HERITAGE OR N GREGORY COHARD JR N GREGORY COHARO JR 1950 HERITAGE OR NAYZATA HN 55391 REPORT NO. PI9S5401 PAGE 20 • ^ *SB 10-117-2S 92 0009 019B0 HERITAGE OR JAMES GARLAND NRIGHT JAMES GARLAND NRIGHT 19B0 HERITAGE OR NAYZATA MN 55S9130 10-117-23 92 00170003B ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO M A NELSON A J A NELSON MORRIS A/JACqUELINE A NELSON 1900 SHORELINE OR NAYZATA MN 55391 f •.^ i%•;l4- ;• ., i'•«9 ►V « :>4 *• ..U *v • \ ’ *•••9 %«#*. -t’*-- V‘V1 ' • *•r T. . , .\t*? I ». i *r •r • *•’'■ky ' ^. r. i ■;i. •I * • ‘ i ,■ J• »I • I t• . . / • . ort Xt»»>9 V ^* Jv*■ k,TOTAL BATCH 009 ooooa , . • 1 ' ^ •A ^ y *. •' $ * f* , ’ . i f. ‘ 4* ’ T ' • ■: • ■ T ' Vi-. 'I• A i •'• *• ’ ” •• .!.•>»; vii. ■* .N'*'' ^ V'*.'. r. f * • 736 :-■> •'t:y ' . ■ Jt' • • ' • \h:- ■ “I;!' p ■ • ■ ''‘hT . • ■ 4 ^ W' y ■'i 4 j‘ Aik’'• ' ^ ' 1 CERTITY THAT THE TACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OT INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEfMEPlN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OT PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLCOCe AF« BELIEF. 'if. ‘ • * V' -.2 .•'9 ■ 1 f ■» y> >r ; ' ■■ . L4 ‘ ■ v>-., ■ .: 1' ' t', 0* - '9 \ A ‘ / if ■ • / <!• ■ V » ■•• ’*1i0 ‘ 4.9. * ‘, i' ■;S':.p . p-P * 'li ^ ' • S j' "A rj#fy.'i. J?-.'♦ '.IB .<• •V . ■ ■ : .‘fi • ■ ■• ‘•1. ■ M''' .' -v ’■ 'Xi 4" -'JyV' #m ^ ^<x * ' . •«. \ f . . *v ' 1 ^ ^ t'if V-'■f;' V- \ I CITY I^3RONO City of ORON [ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCt NO.829 A RESOLOTION GRANTING A RENEWAL VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) FILE #1540 W3EREAS, Ronald and Julie Prineas (hereinafter "the and legally described as follows; Per Exhibit "lA" and attached (hereinafter "the property")? WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the ® renewal of variances granted in 1989 per Resolution #2^50 to width 30- where a defined lot width of 200' is normally required NOW, THEREFORE, BE -T RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1540. 2. The property is located in the LR-IA Single Family La)ceshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission originally reviewed application #1410 on May 15, 1989, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings; A) The lot area exceeds t.he minimum 2.0 dry buildable acre requirement. B) A feasible building envelope exists in addition to primary and alternate drainfield sites which have bee. ‘■*-8ted and approved for use. vi The hardship to the property lies in its available for purchase that would increase the defined lot width to the 200* minimum standard. Page 1 of 5 i City of ORONO Cl TV RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.2329 ORONO 4. The Hennepin County Department of Public Works has verified that the County will approve a private driveway access onto County Road 15. 5. Although the property contains a feasible building site, that site is limited by narrowness of the lot and by the designated drainfield sites, hence careful site planning will be required in developing the property. Therefore, it is appropriate that a diagram of the building envelope and drainfield sites be filed with this resolution to make future potential buyers cf the property aware of the site limitations. 6. The City Council < -iginally granted this variance in 1909 per Resolution 12650 and finds no chan'T'ss from the original findings and conditions of that resolution. 7. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendatiocs of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by t e applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 8. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; i» necessary to preserve a substantial property right of applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. COMCUISIOlfS, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the construction of a single family residence on this lot width 30 ’ where a 200* defined lot width is normally re<|uired for construction of a single family residence, subject to t.he following conditional Page 2 of 9 I Cl rv aRONCF City of OROIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _282_9__________ 1. Any proposed residence must meet the required minimum setbacks established for the LR-lA zoning district, and must further meet the required setbacks from drainfield sites. 2. A diagram of the building envelope and approved drainfield sites shall be attached to thii< resolution as Exhibit "B", to advise future potential buyers of the property of the building site limitations. 3. Any proposed residence or development of the property shall meet the hardcover requirements of the LR-IA zoning district. 4. No other zoning variances for development of this property will be granted. 5. The approved access for the property is a single drive way at County Road 15. 6. The standard park fee shall be collected by the City at the time a building permit is issued. 7. Authorities granted by this resolution run with tne property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (July 9, 1991). 8. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. m 9. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby sgree to the recording of this resolution in th© chain of title of .the property. Page 3 of S City of OROINO Cl T y OF ORONa RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2829_________ Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 9th day of July, 1990. ATT, T: Tallin, City Clerk ■ erty Owner(s) S^TE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on Sl:i‘li’n^%?y=^r°Ccii^'ci^%\“'orth^/ri\y’';f°”rro, municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behal of the City. 1 TMtetSA L. NAAS . N9fAirr HilUO • MtNKeSOTA MENNePIN COUNTY Page 4 of 5 pp- -I cirv ORONOJ City of OFIOIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2829_________ STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF DADE j ss. On this day ofof hin and tor saW county, personally , joint owneTf Known to me to be thebefore me a Notary Public within appeared Ronald James Prineas^ jo—..— —-, - - - person(a) described in and who executed the foregoing i*?strument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC E»?A!o.3iriW BO^tO THRU G£I€RAL I«. ««• STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF DADE ) SR . ) On this day of - - - - - -» 199_^r before a Notary Public within and foV sai«$ County, personally appeared Julienne (Julie) Prineas. joint owner known to me to be the i^Faon(a) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC WTMT WillC STATt OF aORIDR Hr coMNissroH ttp. Auc.ji.mj SOliOCi) THRU GENCRAL INS. UNO. Page 5 of 5 y I EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO.2829 t___ Pggqripfcion t Tracts A and B, Regietered Laiul Survey »o. 96, Files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin^ ’ and that part of Lot Six (6) lying Southwesterly of a lino drawn acroaa said lot parallel to and 105 feat Northeasterly from the Southwostorly lino of said lot. Auditor's Subdivision Number 356# Hennepin County, Minnesota, nccordlng to the map or plat thereof on file and of record In the Office of the Registrar of Titles of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Together with an easement Cor road purposes ovnr the Wngterly 20 feet of Lot 5, Auditor's Subdivision Nunl^er *356 Hennepin County, Minnesota. ' . \ tM B" j^e^omnoAl A^o.2629 SK*1 c« OrB«.cb>4«te W,.to ^ i pMnAAA>/ t)£AIMrf(r>l:> S170 B ' At-^Pf^Are (5 sitr C,„oxa7|_^^ ScAue /"’‘/oo- ■ r^w. •s^rtuev ry CArtM«cvt« ^A.u. , M'^ic»c«7ATl s l>^•^^i::i 2 • 2-7 I i • • • • H '.I I I N> I* t 1 \ *t ti» • * 1 *'1 •T.« . i 1 1 Mi waync a. poamamPA/MONO A. HAIM POOCP w. BCHNOPAICH DBNVCn KAUFMAN POBCPT A. MINISH POLFC A. WOAOCN dL MAAC WMITCHCAO MUCC O. WiLUS OL AOBCAT JOHNSON aAAY m. MACOMSCA AOSCAT s. SUAK Mu OH V ALUNKSTT. Ill AACOCAICN C. BAOWN TMOMAS M. BCAO JAMCB B. OAUCM JCFFACY B. MALACAN BAUCC O. MALMCABON UAMCS A. STCU.cn JAMCB B. LCCKHAAT AI.LCN W. HINOCAAHCA CLIFFOAO M. OACCNC 0» william KAUFMAN PAUL H TICTl MICHA L O. FACCMAN MOWAAO bam MYCAS, 111 LAP AY O. CSACL JANIC S. MAYAAON THOMAS BAAACTT JAMCB A. ** N C POPHAM, HAIK, SCHNOBRICH & KAUFMAN, LTD.3300 PIPER JAPPRAir TOWER MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402OAvlO A ;0NCB LCC C. BHCCMY ALAIN FACCONLCSLic aiLLcrrc MICHACL r NILAN THOMAS M BIFKINS AOSCAT c mOILANCN THOMAS F NCLBON THOMAS J. AAOlO OAVIO L. MABHMALL KATHLCCN M MAATIN JOHN C. CHILDS nOUOLAS A SCATON 'MOMAS C. SANNCA PICHA.90 A. HAFLAN BAUCC B. mc FhCCTCAB SCOTT C- AiCHtCA PAUL J. LINBTAOTM SCOTT A. BM iTH BAIAN N JOHNSON BAAOLCY A. FULLCA DONALD M. LCWIS HCNNCTH AOSS* DAVID A. BTAANO STOTT K. GOLDSMITH Li ;?A^w K MILLCA CLl3!A«fr»'H ^ THOMPSON KCI'^H j. p^* .Lfc-ANO MAAK B FCTCASON TCLCFHONC ei2 -333- BSOO TCLCCOFICA j33’ OI2'33B-a7i3 13^) ai2-33A-278< f3i> ei2-33B 2503SUITC 2AOOItOO SCVCNTCCNTH BTACCTDENVER. COLORADO 80202TCLCFHONC JOJ-BBS'ilOO TCLCCOFICA 303‘B93*tMi«SUITC 300 SOUTH IBOO M STACCT. N VY. WASHINOTON. D. C. 20^38 TCLCFHONC 203-BCB B300 TCLCCOFICA 30S-BSB-S3IB DIRECT DIAL NUMBER 334-2549 timothy ^ KUCKBAUCC A FCTCASON PUTH a MiCKCLSCN jANNA SCVCAANCC THOMAS C. MICLCNHAUSCN MICHACL O. CHAISTCNSON J. MICHACL SCHWAATZjCFFACY f caians CLLCN L. MAAS LCVYIS J. AOTMAN rooo M. JOHNSON LOUIS F SMITH BAUCC H LITTLC MAAK F FALMA AUSSCLL S. FONCSSA SAYAN L. CAAWFOAD MATTHCVY C. DAMON .>OHN W FAOVO JILL I. FAICDCAS PAUL S. JONCS ILLIAM D. HITTLCA CLLCN sue FAAKCA OACOOAY G. BAOOKCA BAIAN W. OHM OACOOAY <3. SCOTT AOSANNC O ZAIDCNWCSCA CCCILIA M MiCHCL AOSCAT C. CASTLC THCACSC M HANKCL JULiC FLCMINO * WOLFC UCBOAAH A. DYSON SCNSON K. WHITNCY KATHAYN M. walkCA O “ ->AOC J. SOCHA Shanc a KCLLCY MAAK F TCN CYCK OUANC A NOCCKCA DCC AOWCOAAY F. OCNOCUn JOHN M B aKCAkaacn m. hanscn SUeSAN FACC-SHAFiAO STCVCN M. FHILLIFS LINOA S FAICONCA ANDACW O. FAAKCA JOY M. WALDCAA FATAICIA A O'LCAAYkaacn a COLC OF COUNlCL FACO U MOAPIBON JUDITH YOUNOCA • AOHfTTCO m OMu HMH ha tmo ■iBAOUM INCLUDING THE FORMER LAW FIRM OF MALPERN E DPUCK August 24, 1990 cmroi' ORONC Mr. Mike Gaffron CITY OF ORONO P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Ba;;, MN 55323 AUG 2 7 1990 Re:Torrens Certificate for Resolution No. 2825 Dear Mike: we have been informed by Metro Legal Services that the above-referenced resolution relates to Torrens property. In order to file this resolution, we will as Certificate. Please contact the holder of the Cerwificat , listed below, and have him bring the Certificate to our office. #2825/Ruce Cert. #740958 Steven J. Ruce 4625 West Branch Road Mound, MN 55364 (sent 3/28/90) 2832/Prochniw!"aL''284VR«d a^^being^retur^^ are variances and relate to Torrens property. Variances be filed on Torrens property. Resolutions sent for filing are: 2827/Calvin Prosbyterian Church 2828/Pilkins 2841/Stubbs Bonestroo Rosene Anderilk & Associates Ono 0 FI •ooe^ W FE • iOt^ C Andrrwi F£ MJl'vm L ScvvJU fe 6 Tvy»MM »»k 0^f>r t Coo* F£ Thomjs E Noy« PI G 5f^- nic M Ff Suwr M CPA •Smo Co^Uiiur^ Engineers & Architects MrMifa*0 A Sjnibrt] P| A Gordon *>| foce^. f FV^» PE t*nj»d W R>l»f PI DJv^ O LOViOCJ FI •W^rr C Fusse* ^ ■ A Jf»fy A Sourdon PE Mj** a H#r*son PI Mxhje* T »4iutn4nn P£ Ted < ^lenJ PE Thomas * Anderson A i A Oonjid C Su<9aidt PI Thomas I Angui FI Gary I Fyendef f| vmaer Marr-ne/ PI a ffau F£ Agnes M A : C F Thomas Apterson FI i^<vh PP James P Mauro Fl Jerry D Aetrsch FI icenr^eth P Anderson F| ».ta var* Gary VI Dsn^ tneth P Anderson P| »« P AjAi P^ r. A > W Mone^^pM^ hie< J Idgerrort. May 29, 1992 V City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phao j Casv^ Pf Mar* D ’JUWd Pf Mies B ier'seti Pf L Pr-AO G/a^ i« PI *anpn L jyiemen P| F Tadd Foi»r P| *f rn P rjop PE jhawn D Gustafson ( Ceciiio <>vier PI Chanes A Enciison Ler. M Pm^vy Marian M Oson 'ames P lngee>aPX />0 % JUN 1 1992 vf'♦4/ Attn: Mr. John Gerhardson Rc: IJft Station No. 9 Restoration Our File No. 13964 Dear Mr. Gerhardson: Enclosed are the bid tubs for the Orono Lift Station Restoration Project. The low bidder was NewMech Companies, Inc. with a base bid of $46,800.00. NewMech submitted an alternate bid to supply ABS Pump in lieu of the Flygt Pump specified. Total deduct for ABS Pumps would be $5,000.00. The ABS Pump quoted does not meet the performance and operating efficiencies specified for the Flygt Pump. Therefore, the ABS Pump alternate is not recommended. We recommend awarding this contract to NewMech Companies, Inc. for $46,800.(K) which will provide the Flygt Pumps and Consolidated Electric control panels. If you have any questions about this project, please call me at 636-4600. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK Si ASSOCIATES, INC. Daryl Kirschenmun DiCU End. I vw*4 cor 2535 Sl/nt Hfghvy^y U • $l. P#yl. Mlnrwsota 55111 • 612-61«-«600 I ftmiitnw Project Name Lift Station N(v 9 Renovational AnMk • Aiiodatts Project No.File No LW>4ctr-tsr-Bid Ofjcnin^KHK) a.m.. C.D.S.T., Wednesday, May 20, 1992 Owner City of Orono II rcproc • V I I iydiat thtt ofbidt received. Dial 1 I ilt Station Hemnaiion ind renKwai of achtini fijtiTp.. piptngt A accoMKilct; inaUlLiUoii of cofic. lop tlab mfmcoem fiaidi; tiie tmprvi, elrc nwl; pnlntiFif; Jt mm LUNtP Sl'M VS ISmXAB Rkhard W. Faslrr. f K. Ref. No. I1M>9BID TABl'LATION Tnbululion of Five l>ow Bids of Seven Received nu No. I Ni^ Ntcch C om primes Inc. HM So. 2 I a I ciur C'onti, Inc. Bid No. 3 Ciilbert Mechanical Inc Bid No. 4 Peon Contnetmf Inc. KdNa S Gndor Cofttt., lad Ucli Qb tnll PlJlt I'nlt PcKx l2t*l ina l^ia]tUss IsSSl t lyi frM Xfia 4ABOOO0 S7.1O)00 58.168.00 SMIQlSQ ivr 1 k •/ ( r h ■> INn^Mcch ( 4wp«rum Inc.BM^o. iLaTour Qmtt.. Inc Bkl No. iGilbert Mrrhanicai Coni. Inc MB ^ 4 By Sa» §Pfftn Comractinf, Inc Oridnr Q»t« toe. Utn Inll Qtv Loll Cdst ToUi trnii ItU I nit Cdsi loM I'oM Inn XcisI Attemm Eqiilpffient hooi Pump*PuiLp A C<intn>l Pumpt A CoBirol Pump! £ Pane} Sutan. Pump MuvfhctBitr ABS ABS Hydromat ic Aar.^iydro.AmMydm. AddDnioci (5,UU000)(6.M0 50)(3,or»nO)(3,7«mi)(1499.00) hno Puat!» A Cootrot Kuiim Pompai Mioofftiior ABS AM ABMMm nO)(3,«»n»)i IE i .1 ' > A ItCTI imiTAS BI-2 Bid No. 1 BklNo. 2 Bid No. 3 Bid No. 4 BidNa5WMUmi. CMi. clMck,< aril <»y—W Five Percent Five Pertcn(Hve Pcrccni Five Percent Five Percent Flrtii NcwMcch Companicj, Inc.LaTour f'ofistruction, Id'J.(iilbcrt Mechanical Contractors, Inc. Penn Contracting, Inc.Gridor CoostractioB, Inc. •y Jerry J. Pt*%er Thctxlorc J. LaTour P. Dan (Jilbert Dean Luxenburg Harold Theisen THb Elec. Vk* PrcHidcnJ President President r^csidenl 1633 Euslis Strcci 21 U Co. Rd 8 N.W.4451 W. 76th Street 1697 Peltier Lake Dr. 1886 Berkshire Lmc St Paul. MN Maple Lake, MN Minneapolis, M.N Centerville, MN Plymouth, MN Uy ( «*r 55UI6-1288 53358 554.35 55038 55441 TtfcffkoM*(612) 64V04M %V5W3 8.35-3810 426-9130 <612) 559-3734 r«BMk.(612) 642-S5%835-4765 429-4699 (612) 559-3736 91 ^ 4 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Qf!v G BtaDerf VI * MJ^epri C Andt^fUk PE ^ Vxv^4 Pf f P( Qterr^ t Ctx>t ®t F »*E ffoorft G V Vjvin M C P • •>nof CcX'UjKjni Engineers & Architects McM^erd A Pf A Otyirinr Pf dot^ P PE »icr>^ W ^HIP» PE Djv<5 O LouotJ PE P-'XJP^ L Pi^V.P« A f * A BouA3or> PE Mani A Hsnyory PE V«fhae* T daixmjnp PF 'ed »» f.p<d PE ^homjs ff ArOfrvX' A i A OorvjK) C turgjAJl Pi Tnt>mas F Afvjus PF Gary ^ Py'a'XlP^ PE lynpe* Ma»Tine/ PF P Pju PF A/'ei M Ptrvj ^ 'C P rnonvM VU Pptmor' Pf Mrnjfi^ C Pf ja'^ P Ma<a^ PF ^ef'v D APft/Kh PE Krnneth P Anciprson PF Mani P •oPl PC Ma t a ><j P| Gary Jk Monen PF Danie< J Fdgmon PF p»'H^ j Casvt^ Pf Mari O viaiiis Pi MIPS B Jpf^Spn Pf L Pt'tii^) Grjyp ’ Af l.^ipn t Jl Pf F Tcnacj Ptntp* PE «pfh t vjop Pf S^awyn D GosfjFvjr Pf CetPo Ovtp' PE Chanps A frcitsor LPO M Pjwpttfv Hartarj M OHon jamej f trqg9\mM II June 3, 1992 City ot Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Op % Attn: Mr. John Gerhardson 'Afo Rc:l‘>92 Seal Coal Project Our File No. 13965 Dear John, On Friday, May 15, 1992 sealed bids were received for the 1992 Seal Coat project. A total of three (3) bids were submitted. All bids have been reviewed, checked and tabubtcd on the enclosed foi..*s. The low bidder was Omann Brothers with a total base bid of $9,174.40 We recommend the City Council award the project to Omann Brothers. If you have any questions, please contact me Yours very truly. BONHSTRCXJy ROSENE, ANDERLIK Sc ASSOCIATES. INC I larlan M. Olson IIMO:li End. nw>5.cof J335 >»%«! Highway 36 • St. Paul. Mlnr»e»ot» 55113 * 612-636-4600 ftoject Name 1992 Seal Coatfrojeci No.FiieNa D965BidOpeniag10K» a-m., C.D.S.T., Friday, May 15. 1992 Omier Orono, MNBID TABULATION Tabulation of Five Low Bids of Four Received BUN^l Offiua Bodiefii bic.Allied Bladoop Tedioolofici Coffi m m m on I'nM fjto liSsi I'lUl vm Ittl lUil f A.400 045 5,440.00 0.M 5>3ZOO 2 fM ’Mi mu ■ppqalc (CL C) (lirif tm. j! IMlMaii ff.l 74.40 $10,53140 S12ji3340 IWOOLfAj BTl 1 letcbjf certify dkil tbio isaaaact itptmiiKtkw of bkii fec cwed .■a»M« MSI jm 09S 0,27100 OJO 5.7 -Iff • 1U7 3.734.40 15J1 439940 19M 0^140 2100 734400 tumoi ----------- -----........... BkiNo.l Bid No . 2 BidNa3 BidNa4 Bid No. 5 C#rl duck, 5% Bid Bond 5% Bid Bond 5% Bid Bond S% Bid Bond nm Oniann Brothers, Inc.Allied Blacktop ASTECH - AsphaJt Surface Technologies Corp. Bituminous Roadways, Inc. t TMt David F. Onuinn President EJ. Capi^ant Vice President Mary L. Popp Vice President Tom Haller Vice President Aiiffii PO Box 113 10503 89th Av N PO Box 1025 2825 Cedar AvS catf.8irit, Z%Ca«t Hanover. MN 55341 Maple Grove, MN 55369 St. Cloud, MN 56302 Minneapolis, MN 55407 (612)498-8255 (612)425-0575 (612)253-9977 (612)721-2451 (612)498-8255 (612)425-1046 (612)253-2217 (612)721-6875 139i5.TAB BT2 //■ TO; FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator June 4, 1992 ‘'"a. SUBJECT: Stubbs Bay Sewer Project Bid Awards The Stubbs Bay sewer project approval process was scheduled so that the bid award could be made after the City determined the number of appeals. The Council adopted the assessment roll for all of the project areas on May 18r 1992. At that meeting the City received notices of objection from 55 property owners. Only those who submitted notices of objection can appeal their assessments. Of the 55; 30 were from Cygnet, 7 from Oxford, 8 from Bederwood, 2 from Bayside Northwest and 8 from the base area. We do not know at this time how many of the notices of objection may actually result in appeals. June 18 is the last date to f'. le appeals. Because it is important for the project to get underway as soon as possible, the Council may want to award the base area project bid prior to the expiration of the appeal period. This would enable the contractor to get started on the base project rather than waiting until after the June 22nd Council meeting. Glenn Cook the City's consulting engineer has indicated the best way to segment the award of bids is to award the entire project but reserve the option for the City to delete any portion of the project at the origir.di bid amount for a period of 30 days from the expiration dat_- of the appeal period. Council Action Request<®d: Motion to award the bids for the Stubbs Bay sewer project reserving the right to delete any portion of the project at the original bid amount for a period of 30 days from the date of expiration of the appeal period. Tos From: Dates Subject s Ron Moorse, City Administrator /5 John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director June 4. 1992 ' Resolution - Prepare Plans & Specifications - Le2i!P^J^eet Recently Leaf Street was included in the total City street miles for the Municipal State Aid System (MSA). It is now appropriate to direct the City Engineer to prepare plans and specifications. A resolution has been attached for Council review and action. Isv *i GITYofORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _________ A RBSOLDTION DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO PREPARE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF LEAF STREET WHEREAS* the City of Orono is a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS* the City of Orono has within its boundaries certain streets that are considered Municipal State Aid streets (MSA); and WHEREAS* Leaf Street from Bayside Road to Water Tower Road is designated in the MSA system and is in need of an upgrade to 9 ton axle weight and MSA street standards. NOW* THEREFORE* BE IT RESOLVED that the Orono Council does hereby direct the City Engineer to prepare plans and specifications for that section of Leaf Street. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 8th day of June, 1992. ATTEST : Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 8th day of June, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 1 of 1 TO: PROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council //f Ron Moorse, City Administrator May 29, 1992 SUBJECT: Use of CDBG Funds for Stubbs Bay Connection Costs 'VX Sewer Service As directed by Council, staff has met with Hennepin County CDBG staff to determine whether CDBG funds can be used to assist low and moderate income* residents with their sewer assessment costs. The CDBG funds can be used to fund sewer assessments, but with several significant restrictions; 1. The entire sewer service area must be analyzed to determine whether the area falIs within income guidelines. 2. The funds must be used to pay the total assessment amount. They can not be used to pay only a portion of the assessment. This would severely limit the number of residents who could receive assistance. An alternative is to use the CDBG funds to pay the cost of installing the sewer service from the sewer lateral to the residence. This cost is approximately $1,500 to $2,000. This alternative does not require an income analysis of the entire area. However, all recipients mr.st meet income guidelines. The Counci 1 has three options for the use of CDBG funds for sewer service connection costs* 1. Reallocate the 1992 housing rehab funds. 2. Wait until 1993 to allocate funds toward the sewer connection costs. 3. Allocate both 1992 and 1993 CDBG funds toward the sewer service connection costs. Many residents will not be connecting to the sewer until the 1993 construction season. The CDBG staff have indicated there currently are residents on a waiting list for 1992 housing rehab funds. Council Action Requested. 1. Motion authorizing staff to proceed with a process to accept applications for CDBG funds. 2. Motion indicating which year's CDBG funds are to be allocated toward the sewer service connection costs. :r>y I HENNEPIN J u I DATE May 27th. 1992 TO: FROM Ron Moorse - City o&'Orono Larry Blackstad +Mr 2 3 1992 Office of Planning an^Development SUBJECT. Section 8 IiKome Limits Accompanying are the current Section 8 Income limits. For a household to be eligible for CDBC assistance, the total household Income by family size cannot exceed that shown for 80% of median. Should the Council want to use the 1992 funds for the connection program, it will be necessary to inform this office of that decision as soon as possible, so funds are not assigned to the waiting housing rehabilitation clients. While this office has the forms necessary to Implement the project administration of sewer connection programs Is a local responsibility. lb:khy enclosure IgflMtiWi IfcV 7. 1992 50% X 2 3 4 5 4 7 $30,400 S3S,000 |37,SS0 $39,600 931^600 $33,650 10% $37,000 630,500 $34,7SO $31,600 $41,700 $44,100 $47,150 $50,950 92,390 $2,579 $2,155 $3,216 •5-rr ;• TCTPL P.32 .--s: 1 TO: PROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator June 4, 1992 /iV 3 •Q SUBJECT: Award of Bids for Equipment for the New Public Works Faci1ity The original budget for equipment for the new public works facility was $175,000. This amount was reduced to $128,500 to balance the facilities budget. The original equipment budget included four main packages. 1. Vehicle lifts 2. Service equipment 3. fuel distribution system 4. Overhead cranes Cost Estimate 32,273 33,605 71,342 37,700 Due to the reduction in the equipment budget it was determined that those items that need to be installed as p3i.t of tne construction project should be the highest priority. This made the overhead cranes the lowest priority. The bid tabulations for the remaining three packages is attached. The highest priority in terms of bid awards is the vehicle lift package since a delay in awarding this package could result in a delay in pouring the slab i.. the public works building. It is recommended that the vehicle lift package be awarded at this time. It is also recommended that the award of the fuel distribution system package bid be delayed to provide an opportunity for further research into an above ground fuel storage and distribution system. If the total service equipment package is awarded along with the vehicle lift package the cost will exceed the budget by approximately $3,725 assuming the fuel distribution system will cost $70,000. Two alternatives available concerning the service equipment package are to award the total package and reduce another area of the facilities budget, such as contingency, or to determine if there is $3,725 that can be trimmed from the service equipment package without causing significantly higher installation costs in the future. A listing of the items included in the service equipment package and the initial cost estimates is attached. Council Action Requested: 1, Motion to award the vehicle hoist bid to Pump and Meter in the low bid amount of $30,513. 2. Motion to awutd the service equipment bid to Zahl in the low bid amount of $31,712. ORONO PUBLIC WORKS NovemberBOARMAN KROOS PFISTER & ASSOCIATESEQUIPMENT LISTQ7YMODEL# COMPRESSOR HRA20-12 HYDRAULIC LIFTS 1 DTO 28H t FA 560 1 FJ6101 AT1012DSE PL 795 RM 75 FA 74 REELS 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 17 MFG DESCRIPTION CHAMPION COMPRESS. W/ HEAD UNLOADER DUAL CONTROL, VIBRO ISOLATOR MAQ STARTER. AUTO TANK DRAIN OIL MONfTOR & AFTERCOOLER 50CFM AT200PSI NOTARY ROTARY ROTARY ROTARY ROTARY ROTARY ROTARY 8000# TWIN POST HOIST FIBERGLASS PROTECTION DIELECTRIC UNION KIT HI LIFT ADAPTOR SET INSTAUATION 43,000# TWIN POST HOIST 102* TO 204- WHEELBASE FIBERGLASS PROTECTION HYDRAUUC FRNTT PISTON ADJUST AIR OPERATED MULTI-LOCKS 95 GALLON POWER UNff 7-U2 HORSEPOWER MOTOR MAG STARTER INSTALLATION COST $8,112.00 $5,050.00 $1,286.00 $44.00 $196.00 $2,000.00 $12,270.00 $322.00 $1,120.00 $^116.00 $2,134.00 $763.00 $446.00 $4,500.00 224-366 ORACO 3/8* XSO'LUBE REEL $1,180.00 224-352 ORACO 3/S*Xa0 AIR REEL $789.00 224-360 QRACO 1/2* X 50- OEAR LUBE REB.$1,340.00 218-550 ORACO HP INLET HOSE KTT $90.00 21S-5<9 QRACO MP INLET HOSE KfT $•2.00 ORACO 3 REEL MOUNTING CHANNEL $109.00 202-669 GRACO HP SHUTOFF $140.00 106^56 ORACO l/r MP SHUTOFF VALVE $910.00 1 1 1 2 1 5 1 1 PUMPS 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 217^72 QRACO FILTER REGULATOR LUBRICATOR $204.75 224-381 ORACO 1/2* X 40* OIL REEL $1,335.00 224-383 GRACO X 40’ ATF REEL $1,335.00 224.353 GRACO 3/8* X 40' H20/AF REEL $1,580.00 224^1 QRACO 3/8* X 40' AIR REEL $775.» 218-549 ORACO MP INLET OUNTINO CHANNEL $205^ 218-860 ORACO 2 REEL MOUNTING CHANNEL $68.00 218-881 ORACO 3 REEL MOUNTING CHANNEL $105.00 225-014 QRACO 120# CHASSIS LUBE PUMP $865.00 226-945 GRACO 1:1 STAINLESS AF PUMP $820 00 222-118 QRACO 18* HOSE KIT $35.00 110-147 GRACO AIR REGULATOR $44.00 213-099 ORACO SUCnON KfT $173.00 203-989 QRACO WALL BRACKET $74.00 ORACO 120# GEAR LUBE PUMP $850.00 109075 ORACO Al' .lEOULATORW/GAUGE :^i.oo 22S852 ORACO 5:1 OIL 4 ATF PUMP si.rao.oo 109075 ORACO AIR REGULATOR W/ GAUGE $82.00 213099 ORACO SUCTION KIT $346.00 203-987 GRACO WALL BRACKET $148.X 22>584 GRACO 55 GALLON DRUM PUMP $155.00 225-272 GRACO PEDES ^L WASTE OIL RECEPTOR $583.00 156-789 GRACO FUNNEL DRAIN $29.80 INSTAO/ T10N PUMPS 4 DRAINS $4,000.00 wast:: oil storage LUBE CUBE 2S0 QAw. DBL WALL TANK UL W/ FINISH COAT A TANK GAUGE $1.11835 STATIONARY PRESSURE WASHER SYSTEM #8500 HE40185-N rwc 4 GAUON PER MINUTE, 1800 PSI 5 HP. 220V 1 PHASE NATURAL GAS INSTANT KTR 150 DEGREE TEMP RISE $4.550 00 June 4. 1992 KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY C ()\TK \C TOKS (;TI( )\ MAS \( iLK^ L m 1 u Mr. Ron Mooisc City of Orono 1335 Brown Road SE)uth Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Orono Public Works Equipment Package K/A Project #4059 Dear Ron: The following is a breakdown of the bids for tlie equipment portion of the Public Works Project. I have adjusted tlie original bid amounts to include sales tax. 5>cction 11140 Service Equipment Section 11142 Fuel Distribution Add Deadmcn Section 144_50 Vehicle Lifts Add Pits Zahl Equipment S31.712.00 S74.363.00 S 3,966.00 S25.030.00 SI 1.500.00 Pump and Meter S34.867.00 S68.901.00 S 3,96(t.00 S30.513.00 Included Please call me if you have any questions. Very truly yours, RRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY - to John Davies Project Manager JD/lp cc: Joe Borgert - UKP /.Cf Minneapolis Division 3JS South 8lh StfoH Mimn i('ulis MN jS404 Phono hWl M’ •'.’HI FAS ihl.M U2 8’P* fijual t)|)j)Ofnj'iitv tmplovnt TO: FROM: DATB: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator May 29, 1992 % SUBJECT: Canada Goose Relocation Program In 1989 the City agreed to participate in the ti-nding of a goose relocation program conducted by Dr. James Cooper of the University of Minnesota. As called for in the contract with Dr. Cooper, the relocation efforts were to continue for a four year period at a cost of $1,000 per year. The City agreed to pay $200.00 per year toward the cost of the program. The final year of the contract is 1992. Council Action Requested. Motion to authorize payment of $200.00 toward the cost of the goose relocation program for 1992. TO: PROM: DATE: Ron Moorscr City Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director May 29, 1992 %SUBJECT: Temporary Employment Streets and Parks Each year it is necessary to employ temporary parks maintenance helpers for maintenance of City Parks grounds and streets. For 1992 we budgetted for two persons for those positions. We advertised for and received applications for the positions and one position was filled on May 18, 1992. After review of the applications, it is my recommendation to employ Stephen Carlson, 1185 Arbor Street, Wayzata as a temporary park maintenance helper at an hourly rate of $7.00 per hour effective June y, 1992. jib TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator May 29, 1992 /9 SUBJECT: 1992 Police Lieutenant Contract Settlement ^45 % A settlement has been reached on the 1992 Police Lieutenant labor contract. The items included in the settlement are as follows: 1. Wages a. 3% increase to the pay schedule. b. A 2% base pay increase and 1% lump sum payment for the senior Lieutenant whose pay rate is currently above the contract pay schedule. 2. Insurance. Increase the City's contribution toward insurance $20.00 per month for a total of $250.00 per month. This is the same amount as all other city employee groups. 3. Funeral Leave a. This is the same language as is currently in the City Administrative Policy Manual under emergency leave with a change to allow paid leave time for 3 consecutive "working" days versus 3 consecutive days. Grievance Procedure. Add language to enable the grievance to be taken to mediation by mutual agreement of the City and the Union. 5. Holidays. If a Lieutenant is required to work on New Years Day, Independence Day, Thanksgiving Day, or Christmas Day he shall receive an additional 4 hours of pay. Council Action Requested. Motion to approve the contract settlement, to authorize the City Administrator to prepare contract language reflecting the settlement items, and to authorize the Mayor and City Administrator to sign the contract. 4. % %list of licenses for council APPH01Ji^«<;5j, FOR MEETING OP June 8, 1992 Kennel License Residential - Stephen G. Esco 230 Big Island % Garbage & Refuse Collector -Westonka Sanitation 4636 Shoreline Drive Spring Park Kennel License Residential - Rodney Crawford . 4705 North Shore Drive Owner KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION nuary 1» 19Ji_ to December 31, Mailing Address (if different): Phone: (worJc) RESIDENTIAL Kennel License (payment must accompany application; Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time:^ (over 3 months of age) Lch _ _ _ __ ill'i OF ORQHQ L’Tfi-^arc nrcrrcI s/tnnuAm Lfi I iww 1313000000 fii rC)J{JA Ul.il i 7f Vi* r A Jluvv/vvvv Principal Breed: Purpose for more than 2 dogs: <2Dogs normally kept: ^inside --------^kennel structure COMMERCIAL Kennel License $150.00 (payment must accompany application) 01 GEii 25, C 7 ^I «w 1313000000 ni rrvA Ut.il^ 1-C WlAL 33.5 CASH change ^.5 RECnFl-rHANK YOU 'Yv)? it:01 Tutff4,*TwU/V uWl nv'A i VC Vw*/ Naune of Business:_ _ Business Activities^—veter*nary care, reraii, e^^) (example: boarding, oreedmg, veter-nar/ Normal Business Hours: After Hours Contact: (name) (phone) Dog runs/exercise areas are:inside _____outside ___both Th. undersigned hereby makes «PP“=“/?“a 7n council for a Kennel License “ peisissire only undersigned acknowledges oi ate any provision of any and doe. not grant hereby City ordinance or other ^ |t the premises prior to grants the City permisssion ^^j^i“*|gasoLble time during the license approval and at sty other reasonao^^ license duration; and ^^® ““‘*chaot^er 5.*6^ including any special ':rdl't?o‘^s^S^ord"r/Vh/°c'‘i^y“2^^^^^^ as P.rt of any kennel licen^ approva^ Date Fo r City Use_Only ^ Kennel inspected by ^//>. ^ <Date Recommends Approval_2(_ Denial ITf OF ORONO .0. Box 66 rystal Bay, MN 55323 73-7357 Q)(CTYOF License Year ■^Cate Received jF^e Paid Initials garbage « REFUSE COLLECTOR'S LICENSE APPLICATION undersigned wishes to operati^We ?nii(iated business in the City of Orono and irewith makes application for a license to do so. Idress___ A (Street) lainess Phone Number . (City)' (Sta«) (Zip Code) .szcsf/ ppUcant's Name Idress /</^ tone Numb teck One: (Street)VV-itj^ / U. y Individual mber of Vehicles to be used in Orono Partnership 3 V — — r' / PTTV nC nr^nkhiLa I f ui nccrr^Uf < a i/A» 7C* A/I LVaMA/rr nccrrcI uf < a C’UCox33^K4rt«pn Oi Q£H CHECK 7L HtCEIPT-mHK YOU U242H40 cool f<01 T09: 05/26^ 7^. A/I w scription of Vehicles (attached list if more) . Loaded ^oaded sj;;e/Yards License Number [S*£Mfqr.Gross wt. Cl J w .• •“- V Rear AXJ.e -------- • TT/vtl ‘7'. ri s-/yf ^ / 7 tieral area of City served liedule of Collection charges/ dates ^yyy> o7 (3^/y pj^oxiinate number of customers in Orono X /cr<f) ration of dumping area /4^/y A' orara to^toVappu^^^^ be complete, yoo must enclose the following •ety bond in the amount of $1,000, Proof of insurance '■Udart Tica Date jT • ty Official Date kehnel license application EfSective Jai>a*ry 1,^9JH_ M December 31, 19J11 Owner:7 Property Address; {include city and zxp w/M Mailing Address (if different): Phone: (home) H'l ^ ^ W ^ Z (work) RBSIDBNTXAL Kennel License Inforaation: $25.00 (payment must accompiny application) Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time: (over 3 months of age) Principal Breed: _ _ _ __ _ _ Purpose for more than 2 dogs:_^4^ Dogs normally kept: '^^^nside - - -.kennel structure COMMERCIAL Kennel License Information: $150.00 (payment must accompany application) Naune of Business: ZITI OF OFQ^ FiHA^CE OFFICE 1311800000 01 QEH 25,a 11 25,Oi Business Activities: °exi!,ple: boar.ling, breeding, vereri.:azy care 4mU 8ELEIPT-THAHK YOU __________cool ROl 704-, retail, exc.7 Normal Business Hours: After Hours Contact: (name)_ (phone ) Dog runs/exercise areas are:inside ____^outside f^both The undersigned hereby makes foray ^the license approval. Ml ApplicanjS' ___Dat For City Use Only y- // Kennel inspected by /) O / ^ Recommends Approval X _ Denial >>l A.Date fr ^ j- r C <3 % \jZS> 00/30/ CM PRil 92 n COOR 135EMR • NAME OPT477301005 BUTLER, MARY C 11409191020 CALLAHAN, EDWARD J 1119324077 QOCTTEN, J DIANN 11473040272 JABBOUR, GABRIEL 11409005135 PETERSON. BARBARA A 11 YTDGROSS145014501450145018000202020200 CURRENTGROSS241.67 241 67 241.67 241.67 300.00 1.266.68 ssr ssssassBSB ■ asst 05/24/92 PR; 134 CB PRREGOREMP 9 NAME471688060474563339476921819471840871475443862472503991 469526026 476643387 475989721 468821018 472529007 468701868 507585424 469686562 468420832 469087884 474667812 475380151 477500666 4/5444249 477463877 472745694 388625358 471569863 473141624 477647279 475604753 504260307 472500574 121262417 480843542 476018974 477700023 334506281 477028779 473108428 468909535 476783251 470700901 469848107 475382983 473746173 473609629 470566529 409629194 475569177 267460042 472563051 474663296 470704904 475505292 468629488 500403192 477881539 ANDERSON, BRUCE L BOBZIEN, SUE A BORIS, SCOTT W BOSMA, JAMIE L BRINKHAUS, JOHN K CHESWICK, GARY B CORNICK, JAMES L DELANEY, JANE E DEHBOUSKI, JAY C ENGLISH III, IRVING ERICKSON, KURT R FISCHENICH, DAN T FRITZLER, JOHN M QAFFRON, MICHAEL P GERHARDSON. JOHN R GOMAN. DAVID J GREGORY, JAMES D HALLIN, DOROTHY M HANSEN^ STEVEN C HANSING, CAROL J HASEMAN, CAROLE HEUER, JOHN C JENSEN, RODNEY W JOHNSON, BRADLEY P JOSTROK, FOREST J KARNITZ, RICKY D KENNEN, JANICE M KNUTSON. CHARLOTTE KUEHN,^ THOMAS M MABUSTH, JEANNE A MCNICHOLS, DAVID L MILLS JR. WALTER H MOORSE. RONALD J MOROWCZYNSKI. JAMES NELSON, DAVID D OAS. DANIEL 0 (»ERAIQNER. SCOTT G OBRIEN, RANDY L OMAN, LYLE E PALMAR, GREGORY A OUAST, WAYNE A RATHBUN, BARRY J ROSS, JOHN A SCHOENHOFF, JOHN B SKREEN. DALE S STEFFENHAGEN. RONAL SULLIVAN. STEPHEN X THOMTON. MARK R TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE TOMCZYK, MARK W VANG. BRUCE L VEE. LINDA S WALtERS. LINDA G WECKMAN, STEPHEN J YTD CURRENTDPTGROSSGROSS3118518.72 1583.643110898 10 987.52312449.34 430.54126046.09 634.434217222 22 1561.573118128 00 1648.00 31 19710.78 2171.79 93 942.39 385.88 31 15359 28 1532.79 31 18532 41 1720.90 31 16715.76 1526.40 31 19436.89 1910.00 31 17664.40 1599.04 33 15744.95 1434.02 42 22001.11 1885.09 35 1685.24 163.89 42 14667.08 1488.61 12 13562.90 1235.28 42 12416.31 1013.21 31 6142.61 550.83 12 9294.59 839.30 61 292.50 292.50 93 360.00 305.00 31 17427.25 1497.85 93 690.38 304.50 31 2372 .86 190.31 31 2723.53 216.96 A 15 10842.50 987.53 15 23162 56 2109.00 33 19717 65 1795.84 31 5705.60 1141.12 93 742.50 209 .00 12 23422 40 2038.40 ; 31 17933.26 1497.84 35 2191.66 205.95 93 402.51 94.88 i 42 11931.55 1100.12 92 12920.31 1054.33 33 1^744.89 1434.01 42 11389.67 959.43 92 15567.48 1329.75 92 1285. 11 1054.32 S3 104 30 33.00 31 2740.83 448.05 42 12520.76 1174.69 D 93 13564 11 1235.28 : 31 21114.77 194!.12 31 16270.19 1400.20 F 31 17431.17 1400.28 31 16671 44 1497.83 33 13562 89 1235.27 12 10055.73 940.80 15 12081 74 1145.28 33 11317.81 1030.90 59,790.43 IM? CITY OP ORONO CHECK NO. DATE ItOOOS Oe/01/92110014100030100030100030100030100030 100030 100043 100042 100042 100040 100001 100001 10012S 100125 100100 100213 100207 00/01/9200/01/9200/01/9200/01/9200/01/9200/01/92 00/01/92 00/01/92 06/01/92 00/01/92 06/01/92 06/01/92 06/01/92 06/01/92 00/01/92 00/02/92 00/01/02 00/01/02 AMOUNT289.48 289.48 *39.34 39.34 • 166.55 • 80.00 70.00 80.00 230.00 • 25.00 25 00 • 270.00 45 00 315 00 • 518.80 365.23 884.03 • 600.00 600.00 * 5.265 00 5.265 00 • 1.000 00 CHECK REGISTERVENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTIONALL STAR PRO GOLF CO PENCILSALL STAR ELECTRIC REPAIR LOT ASPLUNO COFFEE ASPLUND COFFEE ASPLUND COFFEE COFFEE COFFEE COFFEE ASSN METRO MUNICIPS MTQ BIFFS INC BIFFS INC 6 BIFFS 1 BIFF CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL LS99 REPAIR LS87 REPAIR ELMER J PETERSON CO PUMP 3 LS E-2 RECYCLING MAY RECYCL FEE GOLF CAR MIDWEST CART RENTAL o06-08-92 PAGE 1 ACCOUNT NO. INV. i P.O. • MESSAGE 74-4210-590-9301-4233-249-4225.22 AT &T INFO SYSiEM DATA PROC 01-4340-059-1425.22 AT &T INFO SYSTEM DATA PROC 01-4340-069-1525.22 AT &T INFC SYSTEM DATA PROC 01-4340-129-3140.45 AT A T INFO SYSTEM DATA PROC 01-4340-129-3125.22 AT A T INFO SYSTEM DATA PROC 01-4340-174-33 25.22 AT A T INFO SYSTEM DATA PROC 01-4340-249-42 01-4382-039-12 01-4382-129-31 01-4382-174-33 01-4356-039-12 01-4331-290-61 74-4331-590-93 73-4344-569-92 73-4344-569-92 73-4344-569-92 01-4392-295-65 74-4331-590-93 •••-CKS•••-CKS •••-CKS i • ••-C'vR •••-CKS ■j •••-CKS • ••-CKS 71 I •••-CKS •••-CKS >• 4' o /# ; ••TiIiHili • IHi •I.'Fif •ttiTf oi-ACCOUNT NO. INV. • >0i-4356*12#-31 AMOUNT 32.80 30.89 359.00 429.08 •CHECK REGISTERVENDORLONG LK FORD TRACTOR LONG LK FORD TRACTOR LONG LK FORD TRACTOR ITEM DESCRIPTIONPARTSPARTSTRIMMER ACCOUNT NO. INV01-4232-290-6101-4342-290-6114-4560-633-00 06-08-92 PAGE 3 • P.O. • MESSAGE•••-CKS01-4221-249 42 01-*343-129-3173- 4221-589-9274- 4221-590-9374-4802-591-9401-4358-080-1801-4321-040-13UAL 24-4530-422-00 7,062.00 7,062.00 n HACOUEEN EQUIPMENT DUMP TRUCK POX 14-4550-633-00163.00 MINNEQASCO UTILITIES 01-4324-099-1711.62 MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 01-4324-129-*;!10.41 MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 72-4324-549-91199.40384.43 m MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 73-4324-569-9224.9824.98 MN BENEFIT ASSN JUNE INS 01-4152-129-3146.43 CELLULARONE TELEPHONE 01-4320-129-3123.8270.25 CELLUL'RONE TELEPHONE 01-4320-249-42378.00 MINN COMM RENTAL 01-4331-249-4236.22414.22 MINN COMM REPAIR 01-4342-249-42 • MM -CKS•••-CKS• • •-CKS•••-CKS 01-4381-089-15 73-4381-589-92 01-4380-020-11 oi-4323-290-81 • ••-CKS 45 84 146.98 221.25 141 41 9 13 171 6 62 10 90 9 8 936 37 20 52 60 14 44 24 89 10 96 NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP UTILITIES UTILITIfS UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES 01-4324 01-4324 01-4324 01-4324 01-4324 01-4324 72-4324 72- 4324 73- 4324 73-4324 73-4324- 73- 4324 74- 4324- 099-17 099-17 129-31 249-42 249-42 290-61 549-91 549-91 569-92 569-92 569-92 569-92 590-93 01-4231-290-81 •I.'Tii 1.024.98 NSP ST LGTS 01-4325-249-42 •••-CKS )F ORONO DATE AMOUNT1.024.98 •CHECKVENDOR REGISTER ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV.06-08-92 i P.O. ••:PAGE 4MESSAGE06/01/92 38.49 38.49 •OMAN/LYLE MILEAGE 01-4381-174-33 •••-CKS06/01/92 30.00 30.00 •OTTEN BROS FLOWERS 74-4343-590-93 •••-CXS06/01/92 4,497 69 4,497.69 •PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN 5/11-5/24 01-2031-000-00 •••-CKS06/01/9206/01/92 10.80 1.20 12.00 •PERA INS PERA INS JUNE INS JUNE INS 01-4152-129-3101-4152-129-31 ;•*■«• •06/01/9206/01/9206/01/9206/01/9206/02/9206/01/9206/01/9206/01/9206/01/92 1,370.30944.20502.00 2,334.6084.00424.30753.00 239.04 358.567.010.00 *MEDICA CHOICE HEDICA CHOICE MEDICA CHOICE MEDICA CHOICE MEDICA CHOICE MEDICA CHOICE MEDICA CHOICE MEDICA CHOICE MEDICA CHOICE JUNE INS JUNE INS JUNE INS JUNE INS JUNE INS JUNE INS JUNE INS JUNE INS JUNE INS 01-3872-000-0001-4151-039-1201-4151-069-1501-4151-129-3101-4151-129-3101-4151-174-3301-4151-249-4272- 4151-549-9173- 4151-569-92 t•••-CKS tf- 06/01/92 56.20 56.20 • PREISION TURF FLAGS 74-4232-590-93 •••-CKS ' 06/01/92 55 95 55.95 •PRAIRIE OFFSET REPORT COVERS 01-4322-069-15 •••-CKS 06/01/92 06/01/92 06/01/92 68.65 60.95 7.00 136.60 • REED VENDING REED VENDING REED VENDING CANDY A CIGS CANDY A CIGS CANDY A CIGS 74-4802-590-91 74-4802-591-94 74-4802-591-94 •••-CKS 1 06/01/92 20.53 20 53 •RICKS SUPERVALU SUPPLIES 74-4232-590-93 •••-CKS r -t 08/01/82 1.947.77 ROLLINS OIL CO1.947.77 •08/01/92 26.9S STRETCHERS06/01/92 60.50 STRETCHERS87.45 •08/02/92 3.155.84 STRQAR ROSCOE FAUSCH06/02/92 1,037.07 STRGAR ROSCOE FAUSCH06/02/92 14.927.30 STRGAR ROSCOE FAUSCH08/02/92 12.945.57 STRGAR ROSCOE FAUSCH06/02/92 2.142.45 STRGAR ROSCOE FAUSCH06/02/92 2,633.54 STRGAR ROSCOE FAUSCH06/02/92 1,012.29 STRGAR ROSCOE FAUSCH •i.rii•I rii m ilBl’IiIi 11: • Dikl' 02/92 AMOUNT103.996.65 •63,243.05 63.243.95 •38.972.83 10,646.00 171.58/.95 34,698.22 1,536.84 4,279.90 2.138.60263.860.34 CHECK REGISTERVENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTIONHENN COUNTY TREASFUNDFUNDFUNDFUNDFUNDFUNDFUNDTOTAL01142425727374TOTALTOTALTOTALTOTALTOTALTOTALTOTAL CR 15 ST IMP FINALGENERAL FUNDWATER OPERATING FUND SEWER OPERATING FUND GOLF COURSE OPERATING FO 06-08-92 PAGE 7 ACCOUNT NO. INV. • PO. • MESSAGE24-4532-421-00 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 18, 1992 ROLL The Orono Planning Comrr.ission met on the above date with the following members present: Planning Commission Acting Chair Ed Cohen, Jeff Johnson, Candace Rowlette and Stephen Peterson. The following were absent: Chariie Kelley, Maureen Bel lows, and Charles Schroeder. The following represented the City Staff: Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth and City Recorder Teri Naab. Chair Cohen called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. (#1) #1732 JOAN SWEETSER, 845 OLD LONG LAKE ROAD - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - PUBLIC HEARING 7:00 - 7:10 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Joan Sweetser was present. Mabusth explained that this is a two lot subdivision. In 1987, this was proposed as a three lot subdivision, which received preliminary subdivision approval but was never finalized. The outlot location was approved by the City for a private road. Additional surveying work will be required to locate the designated wetland within the subdivision. The former guest house is no longer Inhabited and the City will ask for appropriate abandonment of the septic system and the well pit. State well records confirm that the well has been abandoned and grouted. Access to Lot 2 will be via the dry buildable corridor where the original road outlot was located and approved by the City. Cohen asked if the guest house should be razed. Mabusth said that it still can be used as an accessory structure. The square footage of the structure is 713 s.f., so it easily satisfies the required setback of 10’. The approval resolution should specify the approved use of the structure. Al Bronte, 925 West Wayzata Boulevard, asked how far it goes into Highway 12. Mabusth showed him the plat map and the location of the property noting the property does not extend to Highway 12. Sweetser asked if it is necessary to abandon the septic system and well pit as it has never been a problem in the past. Mabusth noted this issue would have to be brought before the Council for comment as Improvements are required by State law. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 18, 1992 ZONING FILE #1732 - CONT. Cohen felt that for safety reasons, the septic system and well pit should be approprI ate Iy abandoned. Sweetser noted the area of the well pit is every extensive, up to four men could stand in it at one time, and it Is covered over with metal. Cohen asked If the metal could be removed. Sweetser stated that it is a man hole which has been there for many years without a problem. Jonnson suQgested that they leave the decision to the discretion of the building inspector, although this was probably the reason why it was brought up in the first place. It was moved by Rowlette, seconded by Johnson, to recommend approval of Application #1732 for Joan Sweetser, 845 Old Long Lake Road, for a two lot subdivision, subject to the following conditions: 1. dedication of 33’ of right-of-way for Old Long Lake Road; 2. the guest house can never be used as a residential unI♦ and prior to final approval the septic system and the well pit be appropriately abandoned; 3. the surveyor must designate the wetlands; 4. City to require granting of a flowage conservation easement over designated wetlands; and 5. granting of drainage and utiIity easements around the perimeter of property and along the shared lot line. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#2) #1734 JOHN BURGER, 3750 BAYSIDE ROAD - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - PUBLIC HEARING 7:48 - 7:57 P.M. The AffIdavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. John Burger and Laurie Meyer of Kyle G. Hunt and Partners were present. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 18, 1992 ZONING FILE #1734 - CONT. Mab'jsth explained this is a proposed two lot subdivision. It was ori9inally proposed at the time of the sketch olan review as a three lot subdivision. Lot 1 is located in tru, five acre zoning district and an area credit for Outlot A at 4+ acres is requested. Outlot A is separated from Lot 1 by the Luce Line Trail. Outlot B is shown which will continue to serve as riparian access for the homestead portion of the property. Lot 2. Mabusth reiterated that at the sketch plan review, it was felt that the Commission would not approve any kind of encroachment of the designated wetland and advised the applicant to work with the owners of the properties in the Bayside Landing subdivision. She explained that Burger has obtained an easement to achieve access over the existing private driveway that serves Lot 1, Bayside Landng. Based on the underlying easement that the City has over Landmark Drive, Mr. Burger would have the right to use Landmark Drive for access per the opinion of the City Attorney. Burger has worked with the four property owners in the Bayside Landing addition and he has agreed to share in the original cost for Landmark Drive construction and participation in maintenance cost for said road. Rowlette asked if these lots will be included In the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project. Mabusth stated that Lot 2 wiI I be the only lot included within the sewered district. Mabusth noted that Lot 1 has approved septic system sites and a building site. is recommended that no construction be allowed on Outlot A. Cohen asked if approval of such area credit has ever been done before. Mabusth concurred that utilization of a special lot combination for area credit has been used by the City. nowlette asked if to get to Lot 1 the drive would have to cross a etI and. Mabusth explained that access would be via Landmark Drive and then across the existing private driveway that serves Lot 1 and will still be classified as a private drive. Rowlette thought that approval could not be granted for this property until the sewer had been approved for the area. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 18, 1992 ZONING FILE #1734 - CONT. Mabusth explained that was when a two lot split was proposed of the southern or homestead portion of the property which would have required credit of the wetland areas. It was moved by Rowlette, seconded by Johnson, to recommend approval for Application #1734 for John Burger for property at 3750 Bayside Road, for a two lot subdivision, subject to the conditions set forth by staff In the memo to Planning Commission dated May 13, 1992. Ayes 4, nays 0. Mabusth noted that the on-sIte septic inspector had specific recommendations to the future developers of the property which should be incorporated with the approval. The Members agreed to those conditions being incorporated. (#3) #1079 WILLIAM MILLER, 2691 CASCO POINT ROAD - VARIANCE - CONTINUATION OF A PUBLIC HEARING 7:10 - 7:15 P.M. William Miller was present. Mabusth explained that at the last meeting at which the applicant appeared, the original proposal was divided into two parts. The first Issue was the gazebo, which Planning Commission recommended approval of but Council tabled until the complete application was reviewed. The applicant has provided an amended survey showing the setbacks of the structures and a hardcover inventory. In the 0- 75’ setback area there is 344 s.f. or 7.64% hardcover; and In the 75-250’ setback area there is 4,544 s.f. or 43.28%. Miller provides a reduction of hardcover with a new proposed two stal I garage proposed at 3,438.95 s.f. with a net reduction of 11% hardcover. There is no change In the 250-500’ setback area. Miller explained that the original survey that they were working with was from 1968, which proved to be inaccurate. The main concern of the Planning Commission was that a three car garage was too large for the property and the garage was set off to the side not al lowing for direct access Into It. The garage has been switched to allow direct access and has been reduced. Johnson asked about additional removal of hardcover. Miller stated that the garage and graveled area around the garage has been reduced. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAV 18, 1992 ZONING FILE #1679 - CONT. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Rowlette, to recommend approval of Application #1679 for William Miller of 2691 Casco Point Road, for a variance to construct a garage subject to the condition that the hardcover removals must be completed at the time of final Inspection lor the new construction. Ayes 4, nays 0. Cohen added that the removals of hardcover are sufficient to support the construction of the new structural hardcover. (#4) #1724 TAMMY L. WOODIS, 2818 CASCO POINT ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE 7:15 - 7:18 P.M. - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - Tammy Wood is was present for this application. Mabusth explained this application involves a through lot. The applicants knowing that there would be hardcover problems, combined the parcels making it a through lot and were now required to apply for a conditional use permit. During the review it was realized that they would also need a hardcover variance of approximately 1* In the 250-500’ setback zone. There Is no hardcover within the 500-1000’ setback area. The footprint of the pool requires a 15’ setback. All other setbacks are met by the pool for a through lot. It was moved by Johnson, seconded by Peterson, to recommend approval of Application #1724 for Tammy Woodis, 2818 Casco Point Road, for a conditional use permit for construction of an in- ground pool on a through lot and for a hardcover variance within the 250-500’ zone. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#5) #1729 CLAIR ROOD, 3280 NAVARRE LANE - RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:18 - 7:30 P.M. Clair Rood was present. Mabusth explained that an updated survey has been submitted. The proposal meets the requirement of .5 acres of dry contiguous land. The remaining portion of Lot 56 has .5 acres of dry contiguous to the east of the drainage easement. 5 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 18, 1992 ZONING FILE #1729 - CONT. Cohen reminded Mabusth of a question in the recommendation that the application shall not be scheduled before the Council for final approval until the subdivision survey has been drafted in a format acceptable to the City. Mabusth indicated that staff would work with the surveyor on this issue, but the Plar.ning Commission can make a recommendation prior to this being done. Johnson stated that the surveys indicate silt fence around the wetlands but on site there is only dirt around the area. Rood explained he has a year to complete the work jround the pond area. He felt that by July-August everything ,nould be dried enough to remove the dirt and add the si It fence. Johnso'' suggested that staff inspect i ne site for conformance with the Watershed permit. Rood felt they were following the requirements of the permit. Mabusth asked if some of the spoils were to be removed from the site. Rood confirmed that the spoils were to rema n on site and it has been calculated that there is enough are^ to allow the spoiIs to remaIn. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Peterson, to recommend app'-oval of Application #1729 ^or Clair Rood for a residential subdivision of a I o L' line rearrangement of property at 3280 Navarre Lane, based on the fact that each lot meets or exceeds the standards of the LR- 1C zoning district, and conditioned uoon each lot achieving access from an approved public road, subject to the following conditions: 1. applicani shall apply for legal combination of Parcels B and C; 2. final approval shall not be scheduled itil a subdivision survey has been drafted in a form acceptable to the City; 3. the applicant shall make appropriate payments to the City and provide urther soil testing Information for the proposed construction. Ayes 4, navs 0. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 10, 1992 (#6) #1731 CLAIR ROOD, 2215 KENWOOD WAY - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING 7:30 - 7:48 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mai ling were noted. Clair Rood was present for this application. Mabusth explained that the applicant was given an opportunity during the conditional use permit approval process to come back and add on a variance request to that application seeking approval of the monuments In excess of 3 1/2'. It was determined at a prior meeting that because the structures were adjacent to a right-of- way, they could only be 3 1/2’. Mabusth referred to sections of the code denting with fences or walls. She stated that final determination must bo cased on property iines resulting from lot line rearrangement. 'e are now dealing with front/street and side street yards. AppIic»int agreed to alter fencing to 3 1/2’ in the front yard area and to adjust fencing in traffic visibility area to 3’. She asked the Commission if they would approve a 4 1/2’ high fence structure adjacent to a side street yard. The road wi I I never be upgraded to a public or private road and will only serve two residences based on current zoning. Johnson asked if the original intent was for the pillars to be 6’ high. Rood stated that along Navarre Lane the poles are within the front yard and will be 3 1/2’ high. He stated his intent is to plant a 4’ high hedge between the properties and wants the pillars to be a little higher than the hedge. He felt that it would be aesthetically pleasing to have the pillars a bit higher than the heLge. Rcwlette asked if this is considered a fence. Mabusth stated that was the recommendation or finding of the Planning Commission last year. She noted the fence and wal I section of the code doesn’t distinguish between side or rear yards adjacent to streets. The Planning Commission determined that if next to a public right-of-way, the height cannot exceed 3 1/2’. Cohen asked if this was the application that Chair Kelley was adamant about adhering to the height requirement of 3 1/2’. Cohen asked the applicant what height he is proposing for the fence. Rood said he thought the request was for a 5’ high fence. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 18, 1992 ZONING FILE #1731 - CONT. Rowlette ncted the plan calls for a 4’6' high fence. Johnson asked if there could be a petition to vacate the private drive. Mabusth noted there is sewer in the street and there Is a lot that could gain access via the drive. It was moved by Johnson, seconded by Peterson, to recommend approval of Application #1731 for Clair Rood at 2215 Kenwood Way, for a variance to construct a fence at height of 4 1/2’. Ayes 3, nays 1. Cohen voted nay because he felt that is the fence is proposed along a street. (#7) #1733 TEMPLE ISRAEL (CAMP TEKO), 645 TONKAWA ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING 7:57 - 8:02 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Tony Gleekel was present for this application. Mabusth noted that the appiication involves repair to a drainageway wnich is seriously eroding away. The adjacent trail provides ticcess for vihicles carrying camp children to the la^e'ihore. The oria* al orainage improvements are inadequate to .andle the velocity of run-off through the existing drainageway. They are recommending a filter fabric rip-rap drainageway. The City must ask for a 3:1 slope when using a rip-rap filter fabric. The Watershed District concurs with the City on that issue. She explained that because of the alterations to the bank, a few mature oak trees may be lost. It is recommended that retaining walls be placed around any other mature trees remaining. The DNR has advised that they will not require a permit for such work. The Watershed District will review the permit at their May 21, 1992 meeting. The applicants have requested that the application be taken to Council at their next meeting for review because of the severe erosion problem, but Mabusth advised that the Council may not act until the Watershed has approved the permit. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Rov.lette, to recommend approval of Application #1733 for Temple Israel at 645 Tonkawa Road, for a conditional use permit subject to the recommendations and coriditions set forth by staff in their memo dated May 13, 1992. Ayes 4, nays 0. 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 18, 1992 (#8) #1736 GREGORY C. PETERSON, 1920 SHORELINE DRIVE - RENEWAL VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - 8:03 - 8:10 P.M. The Affidavit of Pub Iication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Mr. & Mrs. Peterson were present. Mabusth explained that this is a request for a lot width variance. She stated that It Is the intention of the applicants to build a new residence on the lot. The building envelope is within the widest area of the lot. Septic testing has been provided and access shall be directly off the County road. She stated there is no change from the original application. Johnson asked if the applicants were aware of the restrictions placed on the lot and the fact that no additional variances will be granted for the property. Mabusth noted that this proposal has not been Impacted by the new shoreland regulations. She reviewed for the applicants the hardcover restrictions. Cohen suggested the appiicants work closely with City staff to make sure the building conforms to all pertinent standards. Mr. Peterson stated they would be unable to build this year and that is why they are requesting the renewal variance. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Peterson, to recommend approval of Application #1736 for G-egory C. Peterson at 1920 Shoreline Drive, for a renewal variance to construct a new residence, subject to the same conditions of approval with the previous application. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#9) #1737 RICHARD HOLLANDER, 680 NORTH ARM DRIVE - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 8:10 - 8:67 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Richard Hollander and Dick Indritz, applicant’s attorney, were present. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 18, 1992 ZONING FILE #1737 - CONT. Mabusth explained the updated survey showing the existing Improvements on the property. She compared the survey to the one done in 1974. The garage addition done in 1974 was in the 75’ setback area and the open deck was considered a non-encroachment. Since that time, there was a permit issued in 1982 which allowed the deck to be enclosed and second story additions and additional decks. The additional decks were destroyed in the 1987 "super storm". The applicant applied for storm damage repairs under the emergency ordinance. The decks were reconstructed. Sometime in 1990-91, the Inspectors noted the gazebo and lakeside deck. Hollander noted that it was repair. built in 1974 and is in need of some Indritz noted that this is an after-the-fact request to maintain the gazebo and lakeside deck structure. He noted that it is Ho I Iander’3 contention that these structures have been in existence prior to Orono’s adoption of its current ordinances and therefore are grandfathered in. He reviewed photos of damage done to these structures in 1987. He stated they have witnesses that can testify to their knowledge of the construction of these improvements. He explained there was renovation done after the storm damage, but was merely reconstruction of a portion of the existing gazebo. The deck wasn’t da'^.aged severely and did not require much reconstruction. He explained that Mabusth has pointed out that the permit Issued In 1974 for the addition of t.he garage, there was an ordinance that prevented the construction of principal residences within 75’ of the lakeshore and that is what the varian<_3 was for. A portion of the addition was within that zone. Indritz assumed that because there wasn’t an ordinance governing decks within that zone, the deck was not included on the site plan. Additional construction was done to the principal structure, all of which was done in conformity to the ordinances in effect at the time. There is no documentation on file to show when the gazebo and lakeside deck structure was constructed, but his client contends they were constructed in 1974. The permit issued in 1982 was to reconstruct the principal residence destroyed by fire and to enclose the deck area and add additional decking. Ma’justh noted that the 1982 permit allowed the deck to be enclosed. Sho explained that currently residents are not allowed to increase the Intensity of a non-conforming structure, but back in 1982 they we;e allowed to do so. Johnson asked what required a permit in 1974. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 18, 1992 ZONING FILE #1737 - CONT. Mabusth stated the gazebo and deck structure would not have been subject to the average lakeshore setback at that time, but they were subject to the 75’ setback and hardcover standards and a building permit would have been required. Indritz asked why that was not noted on the inspection records at that time. He introduced John Cardwell who is aware that the structures have been there for at least 25 years; Walt Kindsudder worked on the 1982 renovation project; and Warren Matheson worked with Hollander in building the deck in 1974. Rowlette remembered an addition to her house in 1974 and the restrictions in place at that time. She stated she found it hard to believe that the structures were approved to be built at that time. She said that she was on the property in the early 1970s and recalls the house with two decks and the screen porch. She said she did not remember the gazebo and lakeside deck being there. Cohen asked what the applicant is requesting as additional square footage. Mabusth stated it consists of the gazebo and deck area. Indritz stated that there was a trade off for the garage, which was removed, and Hoi lander was ai lowed to construct a deck. He noted that because of the narrowness of the lot, virtually any construction is going to be in violation of the 75’ zone. Cohen asked if Mr. Hollander had any other documentation for the construction of the gazebo in 1974. Hollander noted he has not found any documentation as such to date. Cohen noted that to realize any capital gains on vhe property, he would have to have records showing improvements to the project. Hollander stated that he has had two major catastrophes in the home in which many documents were lost. He said he can recollect building the structures in 1974. Cohen asked if there was any hardcover that could be removed In the 0-75’ zone. 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 18, 1992 ZONING FILE #1737 - CONT. Hollander stated that there Is a portion of plastic liner adjacent to the house that could be removed. Because of the narrow lot, the improvements near the ground need to be retained to prevent further erosion. In the 75-250’ zone, there Is a gravel area that could be removed because the garage no longer exists and there is some additional plastic that could be removed all which amounts to 530 s.f. based on the surveyor’s calculation. Cohen asked if the City has any records of the gazebo. Hollander noted that the debris shown on the pictures taken after the 1987 storm was from the gazebo. The landsiide covered over the existing deck structure and knocked down the gazebo. Cohen asked If Hollander had any picture from 1974 to 1987 showing the gazebo. Hollander explained that the fire destroyed any pictures that he may have had. Cardwell remembered that in 1982 he was on the property and recalled the gazebo, which appeared to have been there for quite some time. Peterson noted that the existing detached screen porch is in need of repair and asked if It would be possible to remove it all together. Rowlette stated that the imorovements on the lot have intensified. Indritz stated that his client feels the Improvements are grandfathered in, and noted that Hollander is willing to remove the 530 square feet of additional hardcover. Rowlette explained that any run-off from the property ends up In the lake, which is damaging the lake environment. Johnson said he respected Hollander’s position, but felt they should be consistent with other applications. He felt that a stair and landing portion would be a minimum of what is needed to gain access to the lake. He felt that if permit approval was sought In 1974, the applicant probably would not have received the approval needed. Cohen clarified that a portion of the deck and the gazebo should be removed. 1 2 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 18, 1992 ZONING FILE #1737 - CONT. Hollander stated that the flower planters are built basically like a retaining wall. The deck has no plastic underneath It. He felt the boat house may only be the only Improvement adding pollution to the lake. Cohen reiterated that the concern of the pollution to the lake was made in general. He concurred with Johnson's proposal. Peterson asked about the removal of the screened porch. Indritz stated that the front of the porch area is the front of the retaining walI area designed to hold the water back from running Into the lake. Me noted that Hollander is willing to remove the existing screened porch in exchange for the gazebo and deck structure. Mabusth said the plastic and screened area would be about 2.5% within the 0-75’ setback area. Johnson felt there is an intensification on the property. He stated that 95* of the house is within the 0-75’ zone and there are structures within 14’ of the lake. He felt that the removal of a structure further away from the lake was not an appropriate trade off. Rowlette felt they need to be consistent with other applications. She recommended that the applicant ask that the application be tabled for further consideration. Indritz advised that they concurred with the tabling of the appIication. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Rowlette, to table Application #1 737 for Richard Hollander of 680 North Arm Drive to allow the applicant time to review the issues. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#10) REPORT BY PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE There was no report. (#11) REPORT BY THE LAKE USE COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVE There was no report. (#12) REPORT BY THE FACILITIES COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVE There was no report. (#13) OTHER ISSUES CITT OP OROaO PARK COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, JUNE 2, 1992 7s00 P.M. 1275 BRONN ROAD SOUTH - COUNCIL CHAMBERS ATTENDANCE AGBIDA 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Approve Minutes of April 6, 1992. 1992 Work Plan - Progress Report. Reorganization of Park Commission - Chair Flint. Parks Tour May, 1992, Comments. Bederwood Park. a. Playground Equipment. b. Location of Skating Rink. c. Linda Whitman - Comments. Bike/Hike Trail Old Crystal Day Road. Little League Field - Discussion. Subdivision Reviews. a. 645 Old Long Lake Road. b. 3060 Sixth Avenue North. c. 3750 Bayside Road. d. Orono Sports Arena. 9. July Meeting Date. 6. 7. 8. :I I-h: ' i' ^ minutes of the park commission meeting of aphil e, 1992 ATTENDANCE 7:13 P.M. The Park Commission met on \Tl IVo^ Stephen members present: ‘Pi i McMillan Robert Howells, Phil ?SriT?rs?a?;r an. Tar. Naab, City Recorder. (#1) APPROVAL OF MINUTES Chair Flint clarified that •oS;SllsV.on°iio:*’thay Plan to raouest funding from Orono for the ball field". It was moved by Wilson. »conded by on" Vrch'*? n92^l"trt'hVarvV"n^ot"a5 rnd^n^.^yes 5. nays 0. (#2) BIKE HIKE ^h^^^ bee.n working on a bike Chair Flint explained ^ i cu 11 to build a bike trail trail for a long time, ^ ^ following: money, land and s^aff because the City ,^trail Therefore the County was a^kedfamiliar with developing a trail. inereiu tc participate with the venture. J ; rn Chair Flint Introduced P®°P' ® s'^s°“o"nVr:* Don° Kl ng, Chief ran5siapTA"r%"M te^c°tT a'^dTe’'. Miller. Land Acpulsltlon Officer for the County Park Board. White explained that the ‘ M parks have acres of parks throughout five ^ountie y ^ been trying to get traiis He not®^^that^^^ of expenditure of the Park souag I d tie Baker Park with Kould be desirable \\ne Trail and Noerenberg Park. the Schools system, the to use the existing right- explained their options ® ‘ ' t%7g^ He stated th; of-way or use land not a part ^ , , of which much of the County T .nds would sVte through Open-Space Grants,funding is reimbursed from the State inro g Miller handed out a fact sheet on the ^Vor’the%ralV'*l1s the mo:»t ^iint Sa% agreed that of the road or:::::: r:.:: tK:;w%3?:rn s-.^^'‘.--r-:: are*?eLVr V^s^Ve*ntTal^ properties on that side. The fc low ng options were studiei. MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 6.1992 BIKE/HIKE TRAIL - CONT. A. Reviewed all properties along roadway and wherever there was undeveloped land, It was suggested that additional right-of-way be acquired. Where there was existing developed land with a setback close to the road, It was opted to use the existing right-of-way f'^r the tralI. B. This option wcvild put the tral I total ly within the existing road right-of-way and would require some storm sewer Improvements. Miller noted they weighed the cost of the storm sewer versus acquisition of land. Chair Flint noted they had looked at a third ® being not running along Old Crystal Bay Road and using and away from existing roads. This was determined not to be a viab.e option because there being no cost effective way to cross Highway 12 and the Burlington Northern tracks. Miller reviewed a map that compared Options A and B. The entire trail will be about ?.6 miles from the Luce i.ine T»ail up to and including the section in Baker Park. The additional acquisition for Option A represents a total of 5.37 acres. The total developmental cost of the trail would be approximately $200,000. All of the land acquisition for Option A occurs In the undeveloped property adjacent to the trail within three significant areas: Watertown Road area; south of County Road 6; and north of County Road 6. Additional engineering cosis and construction costs would be Incurred with Option B as storm sewer would need to be provided. King explained that the trai1 would be an 8' wide, asphalt paved bike/hike trail, similar to the trail through Baker Park. Gerhardson stated that the Bridge across the railroad is proposed to be expanded to af 'jast a 12’ driving lane wide with a 4’ wide walk on each side. Bridget Hust, 820 Old Crystal Bay Road South, asked why the trail was not proposed iwf the west side of the road which would tqke the children directly to the joI without crossing over the road. Miller stated that the parcel between County Road 6 and Highway 12 Is entirely owned by the pubiIc with the exclusion of the church property. There is a signal at the Intersection of Highway 12 and Old Crystal Bay Road and a Stop Sign at the Intersection of County Road 0 and Old Crystal Bay Road and the roadway is not heavily trafficked, thus allowing for crossing over. Also the power line on th*} west side of the road was a deteirent. li'uJ MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 6, 1992 BIKE/HIKE TRAIL - CONT. Hust Stated that during bus time, Old Crystal Bay Road Is very congested and crossing on a bike would be very dangerous. Millar noted they were not thinking of children riding their bikes ti ichoSi on riaiVrbasis. but rather using their bikes to get to extra curricular events. Hust asked It the stop light would be upgraded to Include a button tor pedestrians to push to change the light. Miller reviewed a concept ot the Schools, that being that anyone on the trail system during busy school times would not be involved with traffic by being on the eastern side. Hust suggested providing a cross walk near the church property to cross to the schoo1. A resident asked If there was a consideration of putting the trail behInd the school. Crystal Bay Road to cross over at the light on Highway 1 . Duke Hust. 820 Old crystal Bay Road South, asked how this trail system fit Into the Highway 12 corridor. Paula Minnich. 340 Old Crystal fkfng“?»'l IVoViZ King noted that has •,«"tL"c“e’Vl‘’nrxr%^^ . ^’’Se'’n^ ?;pl»ny;°;vrd;'';".?krng for thei r nne. but ‘ ^ Tol Sb^l-of'^cUVnVtr .’’;r?So“i.*:hr a'r; '.-iready on the trai I. Miller noted that "J ’ ' “lnVVrViV*a^ Park, so ;::i:?oV“5°norirc?:.« pirkin, .icng Old cry.tel Bay Road. Chair Flint stated that the Park plying at McCulley Road tor the Luce Line Trail. y I? MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 6, 1992 BIKE/HIKE TRAIL - CONT. Rodney MInnIch felt that having the trail right In front of his house would actually deter parking as there would be no room for park Ing. parking problem. t^^ ??al 1 “could‘dVtVr VuVure^wirning^S? ofd'c;yst?l Va'y'Ro“.d.J ini hVlp to maintain it as a rural road, not a major artery. Rich Wysockl, 2770 Rainey Read, asked if a study has been done to determine actual usage of the trail. notaH It was difficult to determine the draw In less densely piSulaliS areas Future development of the City will determine usage on the tralI. wysockl asked if the trail will definitely be developed. Chair Flint noted that a survey of Orono residents Indicated a high priority for a bike/hike trail system. The Park Commissior wants to now add a north/south connector because we already have th« Luce Line running east/west. Old Crystal Bay Road was the logical location as It ties up with the school and the new City facilities and Is totally within Orono. Also, the County Is willing to pay for the trail system at this location. He asked residents their opinion on Options A and B. Wysockl noted that the trail will connect to Noerenberg Park, but that area is very restricted. William Hyle, 2790 Silver View Drive, Indicated that trees would need to be removed on his property to allow the trail system to be developed. He felt this would change the character of hie property, King explained In that area the trail would be within the right- of-way and the trees along the right-of-way would be maintained If possible. He felt that trails are good for the Community and Indicated they did not want any adjacent property owners to have a negative experience from the p'*oposod system. MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 6, 1992 BIKE/HIKE TRAILS - CONT. BuMTnVtr H0°r\nT. InS' tn^.tulnls in the area. ro"ns c'h'lfd c3':{ndr %? f‘"r :£■ ^ 'N?s"Iro?crrsu^^7n^^'’o: r;ne “ f, *?: ?noTrrif thVy wou\d alTow\ pathway along their adjacent line. Miller stated that has not Been researched, but felt the trains in tiii area are moving too fast and it would be too dangerous. Bob wm, 160 Old C^T^ta, Bay Road North w SnSir;hV%?ghr-S?^:ay”Vo*u'l‘d ^rai;^?h'e“‘homeowners along the proposed route much happier. King reiterated the increased cost because of the need for storm sewe r. Road. King noted that wouid have to be addressed. Miller noted the bridge would be more expensive than the entire project. McMIllan asked what kind of maintenance Is Involved with a trail like this. King noted they are swept periodicaiiy. Johnson asked about winter use of the trail. King noted that snowmobiles and horses would not be allowed on the tralI ..... ".v.'..'::.."'"skiing, and that could be dtscussea iMfiM in MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 6, 1992 BIKE/HIKE TRAIL - CONT. ns. asked for the residents’ opinion on the Options presented. Hust stated she preferred no trail. A resident said either option was acceptable. A r.slden- fron, Old Crystal Bay «nd Fox Street preferred no trail. He questioned the usage of the trail. Minnich stated that .ost Vr°a?l Road are avid bikers and do not need a bike trail. use stated that as a mother, she feels a need for additional bike t raI Is. A resident felt that If the trail were contiguous to the asphalt, it would not be safe enough for children or even adults. Ml Iler noted it would not be contiguous. He noted that the road is probably not used for biking purposes currently because of Its limitation as a bike trail. Chair Flint advised that the Commission will be making a recommendation to the Council, and they will make the final decision. He noted residents would be informed of updates. He noted that the trail south of the Luce Line Trail has not been considered In detail with this proposal. Mr. MInnIch stated he was very positive about the project. White stated that the trail proposed south of the Luca Line Trail has not been included within their CIP. Hitter felt that time and money should be invested so It doesn t look like a typical bike trail as the character of Orono Is very different than other cities. Mrs. Minnich stated that she would like to sea a trail system but does not want added traffic through her property. Mr. Will stated that he Is generally In favor of the trail, but reminded them that the trail would be built for many others outside the Community limits. King Q.xplalned that the property owners will have Input on screening to be provided. 6 s MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 6, 1992 Bonlen stated that she was .n attendance to ensure natural vegetation would be protected along the trail. She stated that residents do want to have nore trail systems. White stated that It is possible the trail could be started this sSmm^ bSt probably would not be realized within the sumiee'- of 1992. He asked that the City make a recommendation on the trail within 60 days. Use asked If all affected residents were Informed. rerhardson noted all residents along the trail to Noerenberg Park :::*H;rer:r-it Ts rii‘^ti?e%°"ci;s\°'’toTh:rr''p*?ope%'t;:* rrAia Brandenburg, 2775 Sliver View Drive, asked where the aSdlllonaT drainage would go, and noted additional water could create quite a problem for a parcel. Gerhardson noted It would go by pipe rather than ralIroad right-of-way. It could be connected to ex 1stIng culverts. ^hirSould have to be addressed If the trail is aoprov.sd. Chair Flint thanked the residents for their input on this matter. He expressed appreciation for the large turn-out. Johnston asked what the amount of the drainage costs would be. Wilson wasn’t clear If the County would pay for the screening along the traiI. Johnston noted the amount quoted for the project 'f iox higher than the average cost of a trail. ^e^y th^ same cost as the additional acquisition is expecting the City to pay for the storm sewer if that Is the option that Is approved. from Council of the entire project. A feasibl y required to use the MSA funds. It was moved by Use. seconded by !?rrrLM^?.*h'a1^Sl^%lo‘nL\r''e»t llde of Old Crystal Bay eRoad. fp MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 6, 1992 BIKE/HIKE TRAIL - CONT. Wilson felt she was unprepared to determine If this Is a good project to proceed with. Gerhardson explained that the Commission is only seeking conceptual approval of the trail so the project can proceed to the next step which wiI I be to request a feasibiI Ity study to be a I lowed to spend MSA funds for the storm sewer project. Johnston felt the motion should request the Council to request a feasIbI I Ity study. Ilse accepted the amendment to the motion. Ayes 5, nays 0. Johnston suggested that Hennepin Parks be requested to provide as much planning for the project as possible rather than use the City Engineer. McMillan was concerned about the many access drives that would cross the tralI. Johnston stated that he would encourage the off-road plan near the school to provide a safer trail. McMillan ask that emergency vehicles be provided with access to the trail. BEDERWOOD PARK PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT Gerhardson explained they have received four bids for playground equipment from the following: Rainbow, Minnesota Playground, Miracle Equipment, and Earl Anderson. The lowest bid at $17,742.00 was received from Minnesota Playground. He noted that after further review, they have narrowed the decision down to two bidders, Miracle Equipment and Earl Anderson as their equipment was superior to the others. Miracle Equipment submitted two bids, one at $21,771.00 which would Include a 17’ slide that turns out to be 12’6" slide; the second $20,359.00 for an 11’ slide that turns out to be 7*. Earl Anderson presented a proposal of $25,395.00 which Included a 6’ slide. He noted Anderson was the only one that presented a layout of the equipment and had Included some of the handicapped requIrements, and an additional amount to upgrade the existing climber. The proposal by Anderson less those additional Items would be $23,256.00. He noted that he Is awaiting an opinion from the City Attorney on whether they have to accept the low bidder even though Its equipment appears less desirable. . • /- • •f■:3 CT3 MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 6, 1992 BEDERWOOD PARK PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT - CONT. ilse asked the group to comment on the additional handicapped USipment and asked Gerhardson It he had asked the Attorney about the slide. Gerhardson referenced a handbook received by the risk insurer of the City which includes guidelines of P' Vhe *^CI tyasking the Attorney what the ramifications would be It the City exceeded those guidelines. Wilson asked If the handicapped laws have been finalized. Gerhardson stated they will be In effect by the end of the year. Johnston felt that until the law is defined, they should wait on the additional handicapped equipment. It was moved by Wilson, seconded by McMillan, to authorize the ;:riT:ooVp°arr /n-nj; ti-e=f^s.roo— Johnston stated that he did not want t° SP*""* raiTenn the issue and felt they could go with the lower bidder. Miracle louroLnt .and go with th'^ largest slide the Attorney opines is acceptabie. Ilse noted the Committee could meet after this meeting to come up with a recommendation. Ayes 5, nays 0. Chair Flint noted that the Committee’s i " brought to the Council at their meeting to be on April 27th. be Chair Flint stated that they have met once to discuss the ball fields on the school property. Another "’••‘'"f Negotiations have started with the Hockey Assoclat for the ball fields. Johnston reiterated that the problem with the ®| ”3 located on the western portion of the property Is that funds on a ball field with limited funds. use noted that this Is the last year that OBA has authority to use Bederwood Park. MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 6, 1992 BEDERWOOD PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT - CONT. Gerr.ardson stated that OBA has asked the City to help with the drainage problem at Bederwood Park. He asked what the Commission felt should be done with Bederwood Park after OBA moves. OTHER Gerhardson explained that he has discussed with the Ottens the possibility of the bike/hike trail system running through their property north of County Road 6. The Ottens were opposed to the proposal If the trail runs through the center of their property but did not have n problem with the trail adjacent to County Road 6. He stated that they would need to acquire approximately 60’ from tne Ottens and the Ottens seemed willing to discuss this possibiI Ity. NAME OF NEW CITY PARK Chair Flint asked Wilson for her recommendation on a name for the new C1ty park. Wilson stated that the previous owners of the land still live adjacent to tna site and she proposed the name "Ellis Pond . CDBG FUNDING Chair Flint explained that the Council rejected the Commission’s request to use $25,000 CDBG funds for a Comprehensive Park Plan and staged they would rather use the funds for organizations helping the'needy In the area. He stated It was brought up at the next Council meeting and Council agreed that the Commission would receive $2,736.00. ADJOURNMENT 10:17 P.M. It was moved by Wilson, seconded by Johnson, to adjourn the regular meeting of the Park Commission at 10:17 p.m. Ayes 5, nays 0. The next meeting will be Tuesday, May 6, 1992 at 7:00 p.m. Richard Flint, Chair Person « / % ^ Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 473-7033 oTf or I CROW I ‘J,-. r> X • t « • ,#• • % m • •** - •'5-v, " ♦ * 's • ♦ • •-/ fc ♦f >1 *.1 •# ♦ #-• >L.M.C.D. MEETING SCHEDULE June 1992 ^\ir ^ *T ^ ^ V • f may 2 8 1992 K -» J» , • A.’ •, V' $ . ' ) Tuesday Tuesday ; V - .k' Lr';.«»-• • Wednesday 10 Board review Lake Access data material 7:30 am, LMCD office, Wayzata Environment Committee 8:30 am. Wayzata City Hall, 600 Rice St, Wayzata Boat & Water Safety Education (Violators) Subcommitte 8:00 am, LMCD office, Wayzata Data Gathering Subcommittee, Lake Access Task Force 7:30 pm, LMCD office, Wayzata Thursday Saturday Technical Review Committee 8:00 am, LMCD office, Wayzata Water Structures Committee tour (no meeting) 7:15 am, board for Lake inspection tour Minnetonka Boat Works docks, Wayzata • • 5 ^ ^ ' w :•*> 7:30 am, departure, prompt V ^ »fT* r r . Monday Thursday Lake Use and Recreation Committee 4:30 pm, #135 Norwest Bank Building, Wayzata • * ^ H f Friday *^IS|Wedne8 ' \ f Standards Subcommittee, Lake Access Task For^e 7:30 pm, LMCD office, Wayzata ' ’ Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force'*' 8:30 am, #135 Norwest Bank Building, Wayzata . • i *1 ,» - *•■*- 24 ^ <1^7:30 pm, LMCD Board of Directors' Regular Meeting ^ 18 ./ / ^ ■ 19 *•^7^ V> ^ Tonka Bay City Hall _ >r::. ... » ^ A -A ■ M >'*n<(£r *rtr4. 5-28-92 ■4PM » K 1 ►I !'*■ ■ i -» Vi LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT'-A ^ •. , * •.». I tr'% .• ^* - $ • . ^» • . —•• # « fe *. May 28, 1992 at tv* • »• • •• • A» • •• ^** ■*• *• - ___________/ • -•• V «• •..<••."/I ' » - • m • ■,y •% \» ‘ ^ ‘ . r» . •■ TUi ENVIROWIENT CO^^MITTEE • , . j: .* FROMj Chair JoEllen Hurr f ;} •• . .. .•^'.r r A'-' J'.- ■ ■ . '■ ‘ ‘ ■• - llV SUBJf June meeting notice and minutes of 5/12/92 meeting "■t * • We appreciate the participation of cities and agencies who Joined us at our Initial Environment Committee meeting May 12. The en closed minutes will bring everybody up to date on the review of the committee purpose, goal and LHCD Management Ian implementation objectives.i'iliiJ# '■f: You will recognize the importance of each city/agency's role In this committee work as identified by the '^fr - “. •ment Plan objec- . - - . .. ..ill ko fiillv H^^npriflpnt llDOn . Hii.O - - - - - _- - - - - - - - . tlves. Achieving these objectives will be fully dependent upon - the continued ongoing participation of the full committee >.►. IT *’r-i r *.' ' nUk^ Those cities and agencies who were unable to be represented at our May 12 meeting are encouraged to participate In the future meetings. We look forward to your letting us know your represent- . atlve's name and to the regular participation of that person. .-<k A detailed meeting agenda will be sent out i" advance of the next^,^.,^.; meeting which Is scheduled for Tiesday, June 9, 1992, at 8.30 a.m. - w .. in the Wayrata City Hall, 600 Rice Street. .I' (. -r. 'Mis-* 4 %*t j'• -? ^ I - .-Cii / • . . a —; z a p:.par" ■• - 'rm’ iiy pi • r *♦ ■ J ^. ’ * V > • *■ f k !< LAKC MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Environment Committee Minutes 6:30 am, Tuesday, May 12, 1992 City of Wayzata Council Chambers PRESENT: ABSENT: Committee Chair JoEllen Hurr, LMCD Chair Dave Cochran, Jim Grathwol, LMCD Board; Jay Blake, Minnetrista; Bill Engelhard!, Deephaven; Dave Canister, Tonka Bay; Frank Kelly, Greenwood; Ed Shukle, Mound: Greg Rye, Wayzata; John Barten and Tom McDowell, Hennepin Parks; Carolyn Dindorf, Hennepin Conservation District; Tom Maple, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District; Paul Neumann, Carver Soil A Water Conservation District; Dick Osgood, Freshwater Foundation; Cities of Excelsior, Minnetonka, Minnetonka Beach, Orono, Shorewood, Spring Park, Victoria, Woodland; MN PCA, MN DNR, MN Board of Soil A Water REsources, Gray Freshwater Biological Institute; LMCD Board members Doug Babcock, Scott Carlson, Tom Penn, George Owen# Robert Rascop; WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS. Chair Hurr expressed appreciation to the agency, city and board members present. ENVIRONMENT PURPOSE. Citing the purpose from the Management Plan for Lake Minnetonka, Hurr stated it to be that successfully balancing environmental and human needs which influence Lake Minnetonka. That balance is dependent upon responsible managing authorities effectively regu a ng impact of development around the lake. GOAL is to maintain the lake as an open, capable of supporting year-round recreational activities. OVERALL WATER QUALITY OBJECTIVES were noted to «. Establish benchmark water quality assessment Idopt updated water quality objectives based on studies. Independently evaluate LMCD's Eurasian water milfoil control program. ADDITIONAL OBJECTIVES deal with the management of: a. stormwater runoff b. Wetland identification and protection c. Fisheries monitoring, protection, influences d Consistency In shoreland regulations o Eurasian wate. milfoil control, spread prevention In^Tuinc. of oth.r .Kotlc .p.ci.. on I.k. quality b. c. d. Environment Committee, Minu.es, 5/12/92, P. SPECIFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN OBJECTIVES FOR IMPLEMENTATION THROUGH JANUARY, 1994: 1. 2. 3. Expand city programs for managing existing on-site septic systems; lead agency -- cities; target date -- on-going; DISCUSSION. Septic systems were identified in 11 «» north area of Stubbs Bay, Orono, Assembly Grounds area ct Woodland, small lots on Halsted's Bay, Minnetrista All are subject to on-going city monitoring. Orono is developing a plan for a city sanitary sewer system. Program for placement, servicing of trash containers at public accesses; lead agency -- cities; target date 11/92; DISCUSSION. This objective was recommended for reconsideration upon the advice oi MN DNR which no longer places trash containers at public accesses. Their plan is to prompt people to take their trash home for proper disposal. Experience at many access trash containers does demonstrate that home waste is being left at such containers, including costly disposal items such as car tires. The committee concurred that this objective should be evaluated to incorporate a similar practice. Recycling is to be encouraged. Hennepin Parks agrees "leave behind" trash is a major problem in public areas. Establish benchmark water quality assessment criteria & standards for surface waters tributary to the lake. Lead agency -- MCWD and LMCD; target date Jan., '93; DISCUSSION. Maple noted that the MCWD 509 Plan addresses t,his need. He added that it is still under review by several state agencies. The 509 Plan was submitted for review some two years ago. It has received early high marks. It was noted a number of cities are in the process of preparing storm water management plans. Osgood reports cities typically are required to adopt their plans within a year after the MCWD plan is adopted. Osgood also noted that establishing water quality standards for waters tributary to the lake must first be preceded by determining the standards for the lake. He recommends the objective should be to maintain water quality in the lake, and then work backwards to the tributary streams. This information should be developed by trained technical/sclentific specialists. Monitoring of Lake Minnetonka water quality is the first step in L^ata is limited tjfi Lake Minnetonka water quality though monitoring over the years. 1 Environirent Comtnittt?e. Minute- » 5/12/92, P. 3 Cochran agreed what is needed is a water quality goal. A sub-cominittee could begin this process by evaluating data MCWO already has from its on-going monitoring program. Osgood agreed to chair such a sub-committee with Barten, Dindorf and Maple agreeing to participate. The committee concurred with this arrangement, the LMCD executive director to confirm Osgood's participation in a confirming letter. Osgood added he will also address the Management Plan reference to 50 UG/L as an unrealistic goal for the la'.te (per P. 53 of the Plan). 4. Complete independent evaluation of LMCD's Eurasian water milfoil harvesting and control program; lead agency LMCD; target date Jan., '93; DISCUSSION. Hurr and Strommen confirmed a linni proposal is ready for review with a candidate prepared to contract for this task. This has >een budgeted for 1992 and is expected to be adopted at the May LMCD board meeting. Details of the evaluation outline were circulated. 5. Reduce or tie up phosphorus in sediments of lake areas where needed to prevent reuse in aquatic vegetative growth cycle. Lead agency -- MCWD; target date ongoing after Jan. '93; DISCUSSION. This objective was held for later discussion 6. Complete comprehensive survey of all wetlands in Bhoreland zones. Lead agency -- MCWD; target date Nov., '93 DISCUSSION. Engelhardt questioned the committee's role in wetland# Inventory and identification since most cities and the MCWD are already doing it. Grathwol responded LMCD took its own initiative last year to i-^view wetlands from aerial photos along the 121 miles of shoreline. LMCD's role is with wetlands below the 929.4' OHW, and it does recognize cities and MCWD have their wetland data. Kelly questioned the two types, wetlands above 929.4' OHW, which are the responsibility of cities and agencies, and wetlands below the 929.4' OHW. Both are of concern to the Environment Committee Hurr noted. Blake pointed out the USGS National Wetland Inventory and Metro Council survey# are available to identify Dindorf added Ihut the HCD has wetland inventories for Type III and up. They currc-ntly are working to Identify wetlands among the cities rrounJ lake Minnetonka. Environment Committee, Minutes, 5/12/92, P. ^ 7. Agencies that own or control land in shoreland zones are to establish criteria to manage runoff consistent with 509 Plan and DNR standards. Lead agencies -- MCWD, DNR and HCD; target date Jan. '94; DISCUSSION. Barten and McDowell reported Hennepin Parks is developing a water quality management plan to protect the shoreland through Barten's efforts. Present goal is to maintain existing runoff quantity and nutrient loading base equal to what the area experienced before park development. Pre-development nutrient loading measurements are taken, and then mitigation efforts set. There are ten lakes within the Hennepin Park system. Blake reported for Minnetrista that its shoreland ordinance has been effectively serving this requirement over the years. Rye advised Wayzata believes it has verbal agreement with DNR on its shoreland ordinance plans, the final plan to go to its Planning commission in June with Couicil review to follow in June. Hurr reported Orono has submitted its plan to DNR with only minor flexibility requested having a rural setting similar to Minnetrista. More flexibility from the DNR standards is expected to be requested by the more commercially oriented cities such as Spring Park, Mound, Excelsior and Wayzata. 8. Complete, adopt local water management plans consistent with MCWD'a 509 Plan. Lead agencies -- cities, MCWD; target date -- Jan. '94; DISCUSSION. This item was discussed under item 3. LITTER CONTROL, STYROFOAM DOCKS. A current problem with two multiple dock marinas has prompted the City of Orono to consider its own ordinance to regulate use of styrofoam docks. PCA Identifies the fragmentation as litter rather than a water pollutant. LMCD has been monitoring the dock conditions in Orono, and welcomes Orono's initiative on the ordinance preparation. ETHYLENE GLYCOL. Antifreeze used in winterizing boat motors is typically run out in the lake upon return to the water. PCA believes the quantity compared to lake water volume as not being a pollution hazard. The material is biodegradable. NEXT MEETING, ADJOURNMENT. Hurr proposed the second Tuesday setting 6:30 am, Tuesday, June 9. Meeting adjourned 10:03 an H. Stroflwit-ii Executive Director Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 473-7033 EVENTS SCHEDULE JUNE 1992 Mon 1 6:00 pm MYC Main Wed 3 6:00 pm MYC Main 6:00 pm Wed Evening Bass Tournaments,Goose Is •6:30 pm UMYC East Thu 4 6:15 pm WYC Main Sat 6 6 am-2: pm . _^Minnetonka Bass Classic, Mound Bay Park & 6:301-2:30 J 10:00 am MYC Main 10:00 am WYC Big Is 2:00 pm MYC Main 2:00 pm UMYC East Sun 7 9 10:00 an MYC Main 10:30 am UMYC Smith 1:30 r WYC Main Wed lO 6:00 pm Wed Evening Bass Tournament,Goose Is 6:00 pm MYC Main 6:30 pm UMYC Smith Thu 11 6:15 pm WYC Main Fri 12 6:30 pm UMYC Smith Sat n 9:00 am Minnetonka Crossing, Wayzata beach 10:00 am MYC Main 10:00 am WYC Big Is 2:00 pm MYC Main 2:00 pm UMYC East 6:00 pm Wed Evening Bass Tournament,Goose Is Sun 14 10:00 am MYC Main 10:30 am UMYC West 1:30 pm WYC Main Wed 17 6:00 pm Wed Evening Bass Tournament,Goose Is 6:00 pm MYC Main 6:30 pm UMYC Smith Thu 16 6:15 pro WYC Main <ov«r> Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Sat 20 Sun 21 8:00 am 10:00 an 10:00 am Noon 2:00 pm Minnetonka Public Schools' Solar Boat Regatta Excelsior beach and Shorewood Yacht Club MYC Main WYC Big Is UMYC East MYC Main 10:00 am 10:30 am 11:00 am 1:30 pm 4;00 pm Dusk MYC Main UMYC West SYC Big Is WYC Main Mound City Days' Water Ski Show, Mound Bay Park '• Fireworks ” Wed 24 6:00 pm Wed Evening Bass Tournam 6:00 pm MYC Main 6:30 pm UMYC East Thu 25 6:15 pm WYC Main 1 Sat 27 10:00 am MYC Main 10:00 am WYC Big Is 10:30 am UMYC East 2:00 pm MYC Main Sun 28 6:00 am IN Bass tournament of MN 10:00 am MYC Main 1:30 pm WYC Main 5-27-92 .1 •NitutNto louKOur ^ ^)VtO O'* MIIVIIMEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT P.O. Box 387. Wavzata. Minnesota 55391 •QMD OF MANABOIS: James R.SpansJey: Pres • Jotin E Thomas • Rcturd R Miiier RoMn 0 Enckson • C WOoorew Love • Clarkson Lmdiey • Thomas Mao<e. Jr ua HienTOau 931DAJ L r RULES AHD POLICIES COMMITTEE MEETING JUiV 1 ^Qzr> * — a 3:00 p.m. Thursday, June 11, 1992 At the Offices of: Popham, Haik, Schnobrich & Kaufman, Ltd. 3300 Piper Jaffray Tower 222 South Ninth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 <612) 333-4800 AGENDA 1. Review of policies regarding charging professional costs incurred by District in regard to processing permits. 2. Review possible licensure of rip rap contractors. 3. Discuss compiling District procedures and policies. *■ Iiiu 1*1■ ■■tV:fr Trail ;ri: r«TiTt r^TsTi P;lfT« r«N« •IRH; L\9T*\ RICTO Mllfl* [•W MlliTt /~\ Location: Purpose: City of Tonka Bay, Sec. 27CA, Gideon's Bay, Lake Minnetonka Installation of 120 lineal feet of rip rap shoreline erosion protection. Permit Application Ho. 92-08: Applicant: Chuck Downey 2665 Casco Point Rd. Wayzata, MN 55391 Location: City of Orono, Sec. 20BC, Spring Park Bay, Lake Minnetonka Purpose: Installation of 180 lineal feet of rip rap shoreline erosion protection. Permit Aoolication Ho. 92-09: Applicant: Irene Standa 2659 Casco Point Rd. Wayzata, MN 55391 Location: City of Orono, Sec. 20BC, Spring Park Bay, Lake Minnetonka Purpose: Installation of 180 lineal feet of rip rap shoreline erosion protection. Libbs Lake update. Permit Application Wo. 89-06 Applicant: Ben and Judy Simmons 2558 Crosby Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Location: City of Minnetonka, Sec. 8DA, Grays Bay, Lake Minnetonka Dredging to remove 630 cubic yards of material from a channel to improve navigational access. Purpose: Permit Application Ho. 89-208 Applicant: Thomas McMorrow Location: Purpose: 2807 McKenzie Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 City of Minnetonka, Sec. 8CC, Wayzata Bay, Lake Minnetonka •After-the-fact" permit for construction of a wood retaining wall and placement of fill in the Lake Minnetonka floodplain. Permit Application No. 92-2B i Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board/Todd Park Violation Permit Application.Wo. 92-23 Jeff Danbury/Rip Rap Violation Permit Application No. 92-3Q City of Shorewood/Possiblc Violation -2- • t » SAND BL £fij lit Application No. 91-76 Applicant: Lawrence R. Paste 3896 Sunset Drive Spring Park, MN 55384 Location; City of Spring Park, Section 18DD, West Arm, Lake Minnetonka Purpose: Installation of approximately 80 lineal feet of rip rap shoreline erosion protection and a beach sand blanket "after-the-fact**. Nedi Podany, Mound Roger Fronnelt, Orono John Reichenberger, Hinnetrista Permit Application No. 91-107 Applicant: Michael Paxton Location; Purpose: 40 Gideons Point Road Tonka Bay, MN 55331 City of Tonka Bay, Sec. 28AD, Gideons Bay, Lake Minnetonka Construction of a boulder sea wall •after-the-fact." permit Application Ho. 91-77 Applicant: Michael Gilbertson 4350 Wilshire Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 City of Mound, Sec. 19AC, Black Lake, Lake Minnetonka "After-the-fact" floodplain alteration and installation of an unspecified amount of rip rap shoreline erosion protection. Location: Purpose: Sandra Vroman, Plymouth Permit Application No. 89-174 Applicant: City of Tonka Bay 4901 Manitou Road Tonka Bay, MN 55331 City of Tonka Bay, Sec. 28DC Stormwater management plan for grading of Manitou Park. Location: Purpose: Jack Cook, Mound T.L. Kellogg, Greenwood -3- Carole Munsen, Mound Keith Wilcox* Greenwood James Klein* 6600 Smithtown Road* Excelsior* MR 55331 Richard Salih* 6628 Smithtown Road* Excelsior* MR 55331 Review of District Permit Procedures Executive Session discussion of outstanding litigation issues 5.Adioum 899DAJ(39) -4- ii 1 V4 51 i'll wantiifinft *#( i\mmmIM 1216^0 County RuaJ 50 Corcoran. MN 55)40 (612) 420-4546 May 30, 1092 Dear Mayor, We would like to cordially invite yen to join us Friday, July 24, at 1:00 p.m. at the Hennepin County Fair. We are planning an hour long Mayors' Invitational Horseshoe Pitch, which will also include the presentation of Hennepin County's Outstanding Senior Citizen's Awards* We would like you to be part of the fun, and to represent your city in the festivities. A member of our Board, Mrs. Florence Gaulke, will be contracting you in the near future, to see if your schedule will allow you to join us. The Fair is held at Corcoran Lions Park, 3 miles north of Hwy. 55 on Hwy. 101 North and County Road 10 (Bass ’ake Road) in Corcoran. If you have any questions please all Linda, 420-4546. Enclosed is a schedule of events being planned for the fair. Please encourage youi citizens to attend this county fair, and plan on attending yourself! Sincerely, Linda Milow Secretary •• Hennepin County f^air Tv. ^'.1. i V i • t ■5»#r » ft rf • . . * #- i^i: f-.j... ^ . r ^ 1 ’>i K 420-4M6 .for mbrerinformation ,^V E J t:i_ J r:: ^••■V s, Tr.T'^c. —*-,r; Corcoran Lions Park - 3 miles north of Hamel on .i|'V state Hwy. 101 at County Rd. 10 *?>• /; ^ f. ^ V ;. %FREE QRANDSTAND SHOWS -m:tM V*S”* ► j- i^ft • > “••4 -- *,^ r» “ , .<, pf^FRiDAY»« .V MOTO CROSS ■f- .. .1 ■■'■v%:'5ii’^ (KKSASjiSti*'DEMOLITION DERBYfe^>. SAT.URDAYjr;;i^i6:30 p.m.fej. ;«• *** *4- ‘ 4 .1 . • » , -y,r.;.c the KILLER HAYSEEDS SATURDAY>.w^t^^^ p.m. Sponsored by Farmers State Bank of Hamel >;■ f •*» . . /•« < ■ DEMOLITION DERBY •<MllfllWil«»l • •» -y SUNDAY.__-.^^-1:•II T-r ft r ENTBY DAY GOPHER STATE CARNIVAL ADMISSION * a / * WEDNESDAY V JULY 23rd y 12:00 p.m.-9:00 p.m.' • * ft '* ’ V5** JL? ; Ir.; THUR. 7/23/92 1 p.m.-cibse FRI. 7/24/921 12Nbon%lbse _ARMBANDDAY 12.-00 ■ 5:00 p.ro. $9.00 »' " SAT. 7/25/92 12 Nobn-close SUN. 7/26/92 •■^12 Nopn-closp* > ,13 & OVER $3.00 ““6-12$2.r .> A II. UN0ER6 FREE HI fREE PARKING i ■* Sf-W **■'] T iU r • (612)42(M54€ July 23-26,1992 n.OO OFF AUUl f AtlMlUUIClN r 8 ! "V* . ■ > P "V ' "i f» Jft \W*» ■••• ,r*r *"• ■ * HENNEPIN COUNTY "OLDE TYME" FAIR ^ • *V-»*‘ADMISSlON: 13 and over $3.00, 6-12 $2.00, under,6 free, free parking tv -• • *•« *• • * - 4 » « ' ^ t* * * •V'^'ADMIbbluN: iJ and over 5J.UU, b '■ i5p,:;r t ^ ... . ■■ ; Mnlormation Booth at Gate : -nAtl* ■ <*. •: iiir * FREE DAILY $25 DRAWING!!!^^ GOPHER STATE CARNIVAL RIDES .^. SWINE TIME PIG PACES CAMEL R,OES ;^|^JPg > ‘4 •* * PETTING ZOO • OPEN CLASS competitive EXHIBIT.TENT ■ PONYRIOre 4-H EXHIBITS V * ■» ^ .10:00 to, 11:00 a m___Fun at the Fair ill:00 to 11:30 a.m.;':..Bio Wheel Contest (3-5 yrs) i-r^ 12:00 to 1:00 p.m.....f..Shellv's Dance Acaderpy^^,# 1:00 to 1:30 p.m.....'.U..Magical Adventur^roupe*^^ M *9 p.m‘.?/;l1;;!Briar Patcb'CEc^er *. •>.: ‘^^*"2:00.to 10:00 p,rn.'./l..,^BinQO^iji^* CHILDREN'S BARNYARD : ^ 99 9'99 P '^—••......Kiddie Tractor Pull*i?, COMMERCIAL BOOTHS v *- »^v ’ /V'- (for information call 420-4546) i .*^r; .;• „- '..5:00 to 6:00 p.m..........David Sleeper,’ Ventriloquist 6:00 to^ 7:00 p.m.......Barnburners, Sponsored by Medina Entertainment Center ^WEDNESDAYl^irLY 22. ENTRY bA^_..., ,., „ ' - by Farmers Stat^ * ,.v H wTHURSDAY tiK.,'i*-■•<>' ' 12.00 to 4:30 p m.....Juke of Earl 4:30 to 5:30 p ni........David Slorpcr, V'entriloquist b:30 to 6:30 p.m........Cr^rg Carlson. Magician 6:00 to J0:00 p.m....• -Bingo “ 6-30Jo 9:00 p.m^.-iV.iAqiateyr Talent Contes - ..... - -^SUNDAY; JULY 26, KIDS' DAY *. - kY,'JULY 23 .V ■ - .v» ..- , '*... * fo 11:00 a.m.,V.*..Fun at the Fair Games *. '1. a- ■ *■» ^ * •r«~v umm 11:00 to noon ...............Diaper Derby (under 1 yr.)* 1 2 00 to 1:00 p m........Fob the F*.arhccn’ber 1:00 to 2:00...................David Sleeper, Ventriloquist !hi4:00.;.'...'.Demolition Derby] 2:00 to 8:00.p.m.;.:^!?!^Bingo^.[:4*! I \ € 3» 51 T ^.3?5Sl2:00 kWT:i?^2:00 to 2:30 pfm.;^1‘r.^Marvin the Cfown rfi3^.4.o 2:30'to 3:30 p.m..:..i::..Cra.b Carlson I, I Magician ~f‘ ^ -»«free'eoffee/soft drin?'^ *.^4-H Dairy Judging 10:00 to 10:30 a.nvWtMarvin the Clovvo^'t^!^^' , 11:00 to IU30 a.m:f..Rollie Rambo ■ V0^‘i noon, ftP-W’6.30 to 8;00>.^^l.:*«The'Otf1'e?,'sid^PBIG«S^ MM.-S t' ; '^/Tv'For apolicabon call:^20-4546 i-M.'TkJ I' A*2ri MaYOrs' Horseshoe Challenge Magician 5.00 to 0 00 p m ...r.:.David Sleeper. Ventriloquist r ■ I I \ - I i.r V.. ■ ^.' I ; ' •» . ♦ i *1 I • * ■«. .t r 7:30 ........................Moto Cross R-iro*; M 8 00 to 12:00.........BlncK Jnrk Dance Band kis or — ini i -- ( i j/ 1 f >!• . |i TSOT 4 «• ^ ■ CITY OF ORONO - NOTICE The Planning Commission of the City of Orono will hold a Public Information meeting on June 15, 1992 at 8:00 p.m. for the purpose of reviewing a sketch plan submitted by the Orono Area Sports Facilities, Inc. (he^reinafter O.A.S.F.I.) that proposes an indoor and outdoor ice hockey arena on property owned by the Orono School District. The subject prop“^rty consists of 40 plus acres located at the southeast quadrant of the int»3rsection of 6th Avenue North and Old Crystal Bay Road - refer to location map on rear of this page. The parcel to be acquired by O.A.S.F.I. is approximately 5 acres in area and is located at the northeast corner of the property with direct access proposed at 6th Avenue North. The indoor rink is shown at 140'x240' and the outdoor rink at 85‘x200'. Detailed site plans are available at the City offices for review. The City offices are open 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this time. Your written comments are encouraged. If residents have any questions, please contact Jeanne Mabusth (473-7357). J Jeanjie A. Mabusth, Bui Id & Zoning Administrator t*roPGrty Owners list for the proposed Ice Arena located on Sixth Ave N. 1 - 28-118-23 32 0013 Henn Co Park Reserve Dist 3800 Co Rd No 24 Maple Plain, MN 55359 2 - 28-118- 23 32 0003 Francis M Johnson 3060 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 3 - 28-118-23 32 0001 F E Buschbom 1150 Homestead Trail Long Lake, MN 55356 4 - 28-118-23 32 0002 Floyd E Buschbom 1150 Homestead Trail Long Lake, MN 55356 5 - 28-118-23 31 0001 Louise M Otten P.O. Box 117 Long Lake, MN 55356 6 - 28-118-23 42 0002 John Lein 2700 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 7 - 28-118-23 42 0003 Thomas P Carroll 2600 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 8 - 28-118-23 41 0005 Thomas P Carroll 2600 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 9 - 28-118-23 41 0004 Diane M Erichsen 2^00 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 10 - 28-li8- 23 41 0003 Steven J Bouley 2450 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 11 - 20-118-23 41 0002 Michael J Schwarz 1125 Willow Drive N Long Lake, MN 55356 12 - 28-118-23 32 0006 Henry & Nancy Brantinghin 3185 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 r 13 - 28-118-23 32 0007 Benedict & Denise Young 3105 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 14 - 28-118-23 32 0008 John & Barbara Ryder 3045 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 15 - 28-118-23 32 0009 Jeffrey Eccles 3025 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 16 - 28-118-23 31 0004 James Swanson 2995 Jamestown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 17 - 28-118-23 31 0008 Gary Larson 3085 Jamestown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 18 - 28-118-23 31 0005 Michael & Jo Ellen Wahlig 2945 Jamestown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 19 - 28-118-23 31 0006 Roger Zeeb 2905 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 20 - 28-118-23 31 0007 H Robert Glavas Jr 2885 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 21 - 28-118-23 31 0002 School Dist #278 685 Old Crystal Bay Road N Long Lake, MN 55356 22 - 28-118-23 42 0005 Albin Thies 1442 Homestead Trail Long Lake, MN 55356 23 - 28-118-23 42 0006 School Dist #278 685 Old Cryf'.tal Bay Rd N Long Lake, MN 55356 24 - 28-118-23 44 0001 • Orono Center Properties c/o Reiersgord Law Firm 4945 Halifax Ave S Suite 7 Edina, MN 55424 Property Owners list for the proposed Ice Arena located on Sixth Ave N. 25 -28-118-23 33 0014 Michael & Laurel Awes 3175 Jamestown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 26 -28-118 23 33 0015 James & Penelope Grabek 3050 Jamestown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 27 -28-118-23 33 0012 Stanley Stroup 3155 Jamestown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 28 -28-118-23 33 0017 James & Cynthia Kinney 3145 Jamestown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 29 -28-118-23 33 0016 William Lurton 3135 Jamestown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 30 -28-118-23 33 0010 Gary Larson 3085 Jamestown Road Long Lake, 55356 31 -28-118-23 33 0008 John & Susanne Koob 3065 Jamestown Roaci Long Lake, MN 55356 32 - 36 -28-118-23 43 0006 Albin Thies 1442 Homestead Trail Long Lake, MN 55356 37 -28-118-23 43 0007 School Dist #278 685 Old Crystal Bay Road N Long Lake, MN 55356 38 -28-118-23 43 0008 School Dist #278 685 Old Crystal Bay Road N Long Lake, MN 55356 39 -28-118-23 43 0005 Orono Community Church 770 Old Crystal Bay Road NI Long Lake, MN 55356 40 -28-118-23 42 0004 Lou & Jean Beasley 1265 Maplewood Dr Long Lake, MN 55356 28-118-23 33 0003 School Dist #278 685 Old Crystal Bay Road N Long Lake, MN 55356 0033 -28-118-23 33 0001 School Dist #278 685 Old Crystal Bay Road N Long Lake, MN 55356 34 -28-118- 23 34 0002 James & Penelope Grabek 3050 Jamestown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 35 -28-118-23 34 0001 School Dist #278 685 Old Crystal Day Road N Long Lake, MN 55356 j± "11 r -y Q «=|,JJr ife (2W w y uLJ •—» CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS. ) CITY OF ORONO ) I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono» Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1738, was mailed to the attached list of property owners. In Witness Wherecf, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 1st day of June, 1992. Jcunie Bosma TO: FROM DATE Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse# City Administrator May 28, 1992 SUBJECT: LMCD EnviLonraenta1 Committee The LMCD has created an Environmental Committee to address environmental issues related to Lake Minnetonka. The committee will meet at 8:30 a.m. on the second Tuesday of each month. t A