Laserfiche WebLink
':k'’ 7 <br />t;:-^ ;:•... f,/M > '••, » <br />It' “’''■ ■'V*' ■ <br />.. . <br />iiL»_- ■ •■^ A.-t/'r;. <br />IT^:-':; <br />R,-‘” v , ' <br />K-..-I',-. .■" <br />te'-' <br />r'"'-*■•■ <br />i- ■ <br />rr..,^-v; .., <br />- 4 w 1 • ^ .. ..- -•p, <• pi't. ■' -•■ ■• -• <br />fe- <br />f^Vv j^"<.' ^ <br />^-1 <br />. ■K. <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD MAY 11, 1992 <br />ROLL <br />The Council met on the above date with the following members <br />present: Mayor Barbara Peterson, CounciImembers Gabriel Jabbour, <br />J. Oiann Goetten and Mary Butler. Edward Callahan was absent. The <br />following represented the City staff: City Administrator Ron <br />Moorse* Public works Director John Gerhardson, Building & Zoning <br />Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Police Chief Stephen Sullivan, City <br />Attorney Tom Barrett, and City Recorder Teri Naab. Mayor Peterson <br />called the meeting to order at 7:17 P.M. <br />(#1) CONSENT AGENDA <br />Butlar added Item S10 to the consent agenda. <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve the <br />Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 4, nays 0. <br />Motions for all Items adopted by consent agenda will be included <br />in the minutes in their respective numerical order. <br />(»#2 & 3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve the <br />minutes of the regular meeting of the Orono Council held on April <br />27, 1992. Ayes 4, nays 0. <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve the <br />minutes of the Board of Review meeting held on ApriI 29, 1992. Ayes <br />4, nays 0. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />Bob Beutler. representing Stephen Brown, referred to a letter he <br />submitted regarding adoption of a resolution for property at 3262 <br />North Shore Drive. He asked the Council to reconsider their <br />decision as the property adjacent to this parcel has been purchased <br />by the DNR for a boat launch. <br />Jabbour stated that the Council strongly felt that the garage <br />should be removed and would not reconsider the request. He stated <br />they must be as protective of DNR owned property as of <br />residentiaily owned property. He noted that whatever happens to <br />the land owned by the DNR is Insignificant when determining the use <br />of the property In question. <br />i <br />^****^^ 1- w.