The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04-27-1992 Council Packetr' vk’ ■ ‘t- v: |.‘rV; >;■• ■I S% It'r. £- ••■■' f- m ¥■te i- I’: MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO *cNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 27, 19iJ2 ROLL The Counci I rret on the above date with the fol lowing memt'&rs present: Mayor Barbara Peterson, CounciImembers Gabriel Jabbour, Edward Callahan, J. Diann Goetten and Mary Butler. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, Police Chief Stephen Sullivan. City Attorney Tom Barrett, City Engineer Glenn Cook, and City Recorder Teri Naab. Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. (il) CONSENT AGENDA Goetten removed Item #12 from the consent agenda. Jabbour added Item #4 and #6. Butler removed Item #14. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Goetten, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 5, nays 0. Motions for all items adopted by consent agenda will be Included In the minutes In their respective numerical order. (»#2) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Butler, seconded by Goetten, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Orono Counci I held on Apr!I 13, 1992. Ayes 5, nays 0. PARK CcMHiSSION COMMENTS Dick Flint, Chair of the Park Commission, was present to explain progress on the bike/hike trail. He explained that it was determined by a survey of the residents that a traiI system was a high priority. A conceptual plan for a trail system has been approved by the Council. The Park Commission enlisted the help ol Hennepin County regarding the design. He noted that at the last Park Commission meeting, residents were invited to comment on the proposeo trail system. The Park Commission did not get a clear Indication from the residents regarding their feelings on the trail system. The Park Commission unanimously voted in favor of the t all and Is now requesting a feasibility study for the project. He introduced Jim White, Hennepin County Park Commissioner: Doug Bryant, Super I ntendent, Don King and Del Mi I ler from Hennepin County. 1 V ••f- k ■ fe w: mm MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 27, 1992 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - CONT. King explained that they are reviewing two options for the trail system: A - utilizing the vacant land along the trail system requiring acquisition of additional land to move the trail system outside the current right-of-way; B - locating the entire trail within the existing right-of-way. He reviewed the proposed layout from the Luce Line Trail to Baker Park and explained areas where only one or the other option is viable. He stated the entire trail system Is approximately 13,600’ or 2.6 miles long. Development cost is expected to be approximately $200,000. Option A would require the acquisition of 5 37 acres of additional land for the traiI. Butler asked why they did not propose the trail on tie west side of Old Crystal Bay Road. King explained that because of existing electrical lines on the western side and because the eastern side was less developed, it was determined that the eastern side was more feasible. Goetten asked the time frame for acquisition of the necessary easements. Miller explained that would depend upon whether they would request an easement or fee title. Goetten asked who would pay for the easements. Miller explained that they feel the difference between options may be slight because Option B would require installation of storm sewer. King stated that the City would bear the cost for land acquisition and/or storm sewer and Hennepin County Parks would pay for instailation and maintenance of the tralI. Flint noted that the County proposes to pay the entire cost of the trail and land acquisition from Baker Park to County Road 6. Mayor Peterson asked who would pay for the feasibility study. Gerhardson noted that the City would pay for the study with MSA funds, but the project must be realized in order to use the funds. Also, MSA funds would cover the cost for storm sewer. Jabbour asked If the owners of the vacant land were in attendance at the last meeting. ?v ^ » . - : *p- :» fe - ■ ■ ■P - •' ■$' fi; ^.^■r mm b‘-' ■:'• ‘ & ■ r? ;[■ ♦ ii-''v ■•■ f"'\t ■'•' "■ y.' ^;y- R :yV ''I ■tx-'"' -X. ■ hr' f':- ml<;y ;\V*1 . ■■ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 27, 1992 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - CONT. Flint noted they were not but were notified. Jabbour felt the City should be discussing this issue with them. Flint stated that if the City required easements, that area can still be used when measuring setbacks for the property. Mabusth concurred. Mayor Peterson asked If it would be necessary to provide a walkway or bridge over an upgraded Highway 12. Miller explained that past policy of MnDot has been that if a trail is In place and a highway severs that trail, MnDoi would have to make the provision for the highway. Jabbour thanked the Super Intendent of Hennepin County Parks for backing Orono’s poritlon at the LMCD meeting regarding Big Island. He stated that the City would be amending Its Comprehensive Plan regarding Big Island to change it from being a regional park to residential. He noted that one Commissioner had mentioned that Hennepin County Parks might const' ir development of the sewer pond property Into a park, and urged .lem to do so. Mike Ellis, 1020 South Old Crystal Bay Road, asked If the Council had a cap on the amount of money they would consider spending on thIs traiI. Goetten noted they have only approved expenolture of money on a feasibility study to determine if it is to be realized. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE’S COMMENTS JoEllen Hurr was present. She explained that during the last Board meeting on Wednesday, there was a second reading on an ordinance regarding storage of maintenance equipment on Lake Minnetonka, and noted this also relates to barges at Gayle’s Marina. Jabbour asked If this would relate to JR’s business. Hurr explained that JR has his barges parked at Crystal Bay Service which are illegal by both the City’s and the LMCD's regulations. ■ -ri;tK-, -LI .^.■• - •■ -if •■ • •» . fr-. . hupsif- K'- 'I fm-">r> >' ;v i " ■ rV"*^ '■’••.■ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 27, 1992 LMCD REPRESENTATIVE’S COMMENTS - CONT. Hurr reviewed a letter to Gene Strommen from Bob DeVries. Head of Minnesota Sport Fishing Congress, discussing the request by the DNR for funding for land acquisition for lake access. She noted that this group will be lobbying neavi ly for funding to purchase Gayle’s Marina and Crystal Bay Service and requests Orono’s support. She read an excerpt from the letter, "Minnesota Sport Fishing Congress happily appropriates applied pressure to the DNR to initiate immediate development on the properties already acquired for Maxwell Bay access once the LCMR decides on their funding list". Jabbour reminded them that the Council was promised by the DNR that development of the area would not begin until a feasibility study was completed. He noted that a working Committee was to be estabiished with the LMCD acting as head to negotiate the criteria for the study, however, it appears that Gene Strommen and the DNR have tried to complete the entire study with the Committee only voting on the facts. He expressed to Mr. Grathwol that the project was too ambitious and acquisition of Gayle’s Marina and Crystal Bay Service would be more appropriate. He noted he has talked with both property owners who have indicated a wiI Iingness to sel I . He noted that both properties could be used as Intended with absolutely no variances. Hurr advised that the DNR or anyone else will note that hardcover currently encroaches to within 12" of the lake at Gayle’s Marina and it may be difficult to enforce the code. Callahan stated that the Council has adopted a resolution supporting the funding for acquisition of land for access. Qoetten noted the Council had the understanding that the DNR would not proceed with development of the Maxwell Bay landing until the feasibility study was complete. Jabbour noted a letter from the Comrni ss I oner outlining such. Hurr requested a copy of the resolution and any other documents pertaining to the issue. She stated that with the support of Orono and the Sport Fishing Congress to funo the project, the LCMR will be more apt to recommend approval of the funding. fiurr pointed out that Hennepin County still is refusing contribute for milfoil eradication despite their commitment $80,000. to of i- N'- ^'- pf- ti '^- ^ • h'ii'm... fei-!py. W‘ 9'‘ . V;/ ' •-* R*!^’ , ^* ^r^- 1^ Ifi ..- - '^:Li* ■ '( ^'i* ,i>y A:’i ;|4:'..-. & . ; ' V ■ . ■ - /v ■■-•'* ■:;i- try. ‘f'iTvf MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 27, 1992 LMCD REPRESENTATIVE’S COMMENTS - CONT. Hurr advised that the residents on St. Albans Bay have been contacted and asked not to treat the lake with chemicals during the 1992 season and the mi Ifoi I will be mowed. Next year, the LMCD would treat the milfoil with sonar and would then measure the resuits. Hurr supported the bike trail reason for removing the trail safe:y. througn Orono and felt the main from the right-of-way would be Callahan noted that the minutes of the March 25th meeting of the LMCD stated that they approved a multiple dock license for Smith Bay subject to Village certificate which expires April 18, 1992. Gaffron explained that joint use dock I Icense appiications have not yet been sent out. He noted that letters have been sent to the LMCD two out of the last four years explaining the City’s position regard Ing comp Iiance. Hurr explained that the LMCD’s philosophy has been to issue the license, whether or not it meets the City code, with a condition that the marina property comply with the zoning ordinances. Hurr noted the Committee will be recommending denial of the Forest Arms request. PUBLIC v':OMMENTS Art Tourangeau. 2060 Spates Avenue, asked when the City would require the owner of the property near him to comply with the resoIution which required the cabins on the property to be removed. He noted that the foundation and other junk still remains on the property. He stated the property was for sale and listed at $69»000. He wanted any future owner to be aware of the requirements to clean up the property. He stated that the condition of the property is lowering his property value. Mabusth stated that the BuiIding staff has been contacted by a Site Superintendent of the Toberman organization who has asked what needs to be completed on the property. Barrett noted that if the resolution was f i led in the Chain of Title, any future owner would be made aware of conditions set forth by the City. k*V T-'' k: ■ ^ 'y- h ?;■•. p r-. [ ■' U - ■ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 27, ii#i#2 PUBLIC COMMENTS - CONT. Don Gronberg. 65 Willow Drive North, passed out a letter to the Council. He noted he Is opposed to the amount of the proposed 86wer assessment for his property on Leaf Street. He stated he fait discriminated against as he was being assessed $18,880 for a vacant parcel, while others in the area would only be assessed $12,995. He advised that since the passage of the DNR regulations, restrictions on the lot are much greater and he may not even ha\ e a bulldable lot any more. He felt that his property would not benefit more from the sewer than someone else. He noted that he was not informed of the pending passage of the shoreland regulations which would make his property unbuildable. He cited that he has paid taxes on the property for 33 years. Jabbour asked If this property wus a bulldable lot. Gaff ron explained that Counc I I wouId need to first define bulldable and the Council’s policy on the sewer project. He noted a house and a prImary and alternate septic system couId be installed on the property nearly meeting the code under the previous 26’ setback requirement. He stated that setback variances and lot width and lot area variances would have been needed to build per the two acre lot standards adopted in 1975, prior to the passage of the shoreland regulations. Gronberg stated the property was platted in 1958. Jabbour asked the difference between Gronberg constructing a house with holding tanks and a property on Leaf Street with a holding tank. Barrett noted the City would not currently approve a new house with a holding tank on a permanent basis. Gronberg asked how many properties in the development under the newly adopted regulations would not be in conformance with the setbacks for the septic system, and if the sewer were not proposed, wouId be all owed to install a holding tank if their system were to fal I . Goetten stated the reason for the total assessment to his property was because he has a lot, which is considered bulldable with the I nsta I I at I on of sewer, and Is based on information and facts In the ordinances prior to the shoreland regulations. She stated that the Council has not made any final decisions on the project. She suggested he discuss the specifics with Gaffron. r!;’ 1 . Wc&.vr i"'vl Iv. Si;' ip- /■■ v-i.' MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 27, 1992 PUBLIC COMMENTS - CONT. Mrs. Gronberg asked at what point taxes are lowered on a property that is determined to be unbulldabis. Jabbour stated that the Council would need time to review this issue. Callahan directed Gronberg to discuss the sewer issue with Gaffron, but reminded him that Gaffron would not be able to reduce the assessment. Goetten noted the Council project on May 4th. would hold a public hearing on the (#3) #1700 DALE MCCURDY, 4041 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCE Mrs. McCurdy was present. Moorse explained this Is an appiIcation for a variance to construct a second story deck which is adding additional structural hardcover over existing non-structuraI hardcover. He stated that the Planning Commission recommended to deny the request, citing excessive hardcover. Butler agreed that the property contains excessive hardcover but notes the property has very steep terrain. She pointed out that the Improvement is an echo of hardcover already there and disagreed with the Planning Commission’s recommendation. Goetten asked If there was any possibility of eliminating any other hardcover on the property. McCurdy stated that the hardcover consists of blacktop, sidewalk and house and has all been there since 1976. Mayor Peterson asked If it would be possible to remove the concrete below the proposed deck. McCurdy did not feel this would be feasible and noted the deck will enable them to keep the gutters clean to avoid flooding of the basement. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 27, 1992 ZONING FILE #1700 - CONT. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to direct staff to draft an approval resolution for Application #1700 for Dale McCurdy of 4041 North Shore Drive for variances to construct a deck, with the condition that no additional hardcover will be approved. Ayes 5, nays 0. («#4) #1726 DAVIS FANSLER, 4180 BAYSIDE ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3112 It was moved by Butler, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3112 for Application #1725 for Davis Pansier of 4180 Bayside Road for a conditional use permit to allow a non-rental guest apartment within the existing residence. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#5) MARINA LICENSES Callahan stated that It has been determined by the Lake Use Committee that there are four marinas within the City in conformance with the requirements for a license: Minnetonka Boat Works, Sailors World, Crystal Bay Service and Windward Marina. He noted that Windward Marina has not paid the required application fee for 1991. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to approve the following marina license: Minnetonka Boat Works (1990-91 Sailors World (1990-91-92) Crystal Bay Service (1991-92) -92 ) and that a letter be sent to those marinas stating the City has reviewed their marina license application and they have been found to be In conformance for getting the license subject to the conditions within Attachment A, with the agreement that the business be operated within the existing requirements of the City. Ayes 5, nays 0. Callahan stated he was opposed to the adoption of the resolution, noting that some of the language in the resolution was no longer valid. Butler noted that other City Iicenses are issued with a single paper notifyIng the business that their license has been approved. 8 I#*-* /r if ' - 4?' r.-!>• 4(V" '■ s.. •i : ■ ‘0.W, ■ •i*’*‘’ *-x MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 27, 1992 1992 MARINA LICENSES - CONT. CsI I&han requested staff to write a letter to Windward Marina stating It has been found that they are in conformance with the requI rement s for a marina license, but their operation must cease until the required fee is paid. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT A) Callahan announced that the local newspaper expressed a desire for the City to adopt an ordinance banning the use of styrofoam on the Lake. The Lake Use Committee questioned the City’s authority to enforce such an ordinance. He requested Council to consult with the City Attorney regarding the feasibility of adopting an ordinance banning the use of styrofoam on Lake Minnetonka. Jabbour stated that he has informed the LMCD of the City’s intent to adopt this ordinance, and they said they would also adopt the ordinance if it was suitable. B) Callahan reviewed that Gayle’s Marina would be receiving a letter from the City noting the failure to pay the required license fee and the violations on the property. Also, North Shore and Lakeside Marinas have paid the required fee, but have a number of serious violations on the property. Jabbour announced the LMCD has granted North Shore Drive Marina a license for 72 dry stacking, even though the City has a legal settlement with thr.m for only 20. Callahan informed the Council that marinas are making serious changes with regards to their businesses. They are adding charter boats, boat launching services, and condominiums for boats. Butler stated she would like to hear from the City of Mound regarding the problems they have with Al and Alma’s boat charter service, as that business is located on a severely limited lot. C) It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to approve on a rotating basis, a liaison to the Park Commission. Ayes 5, nays 0. Gerhardson noted the Commission would be taking a park tour for the Ir May meeting. D) Callahan noted he was Impressed with the newsletter that recently went cut to the residents. tir. :-r> M- Yj ‘«-.''' ’ *1 ^•L- fs -fi/' W‘-fe;: ife- V- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 27, 1992 (*♦6) MSA DESIGNATION - LEAF STREET & FERNDALE ROAD - RESOLUTION #3113 It was moved by Butler, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3113 establishing Municipal State Aid Streets. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#7) BID AWARD BEDERWOOD PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT Gerhardson explained that bids were opened and the Committee recommends to Council to award the bid to Miracle Equipment because they I Iked the qualIty and layout. He explained the si ide proposed by this company is 12.5’, with the entire structure including the enclosure over *he slide at 17*. He cautioned the height of the slide does not meet requirements established within a document entitled "Handbook for Public Safety". Callahan stated that If It does not meet the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Standards, It should not be installed. Gerhardson noted that even if it does not meet the criteria listed, the City would still be insured in case of an accident. Butler felt that the top step of the slide should not exceed a height that would allow an adult to stand on the ground and assist the chi Id. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Butler, to table the bid award for playground equipment for Bederwood Park to alIov the Park Commission Committee to re-examine the bids. Ayes 5, nays 0. Barrett cited that the bids were sent out without reference to the ADA or safety concerns. He stated that the bids wef*e received conforming to the requirements of the City. Butler asked if It would be appropriate to reject the bids. Gerhardson asked the matter to be tabled. (#8) 1991 BUDGET ADJUSTMENT Moorse explained that this is a summary of the 1991 budget. He noted that the City was under '. both expenditures and revenues, which lead to a $57,000 deficit. Mayor Peterson requested a work session to review this issue. « I •i. •Uj. [i: B''hip-.. . . ..y : - • !;■';• jf; PX' fci-- liir-- f. •;■=■•;'• MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 27, 1992 1991 BUDGET ADJUSTMENT - CONT. Callahan stated they should also review actual status of the 1992 budget, the budget for the facilities, and the Police Department operatio' ’nancial document. Jabbour felt It Important to keep track of these issues on a monthly basis. A work session was scheduled for Wednesday, May la, 1992 a 3.00 p.m. (*#9) 1992 BOARD OF REVIEW -- APRIL 29, 1992 It was moved by Butler, seconded by Goetten, to accept information for the Board of Review Meeting to be heid April ?9, 1992. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*#10) OLDER AMERICAN'S MONTH - RESOLUTION #3114 It was moved by Butler, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3114 proclaiming Westonka Senior Center Week May 4th through 8th. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*#11) FEASIBILITY STUDY OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD - RESOLUTION #3115 It was moved by Butler, secorided by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3115 directing the City Engineer to perform a feasibiMt', study for a bike/hike traiI on Old Crystal Bay Roau. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#12) BID AWARD UTILITY TRACTOR It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Butler, bid award for a utility tractor to be considered session on the budget. Ayes 5, nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT There was no City Attorney’s report. to table tne at the work (»#13) LICENSES It was moved by Butler, following II censes: seconded by Goetten, to approve the 1 1 I' I I S:V.f..-. 'kf' 'n-!. ' V r/ . > |v'‘''.: \Kl;ti-.'. W'P ■ '■ > '. r •■-. ■' m '^■■: :■;> • i-. '■■■■■ V 'i Irv' ' v.'.«. 'V. •■*??>•,■• i 65- jpvIf. A’ • . I:WW' i-' 5?v' IT' ■■■If- ■•» r-- "i'r I: . r V,- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 27, 1992 LICENSES - CONT. Special Event Permits: Minnesota Multiple Sclerosis Society Garbage & Refuse License: East Tonka Sanitation Woodlake Sanitary Service Motion, Ayes 5, nays 0. (#14) BILLS Butler felt it may be time for Orono to consicer an in house engineer in I ight of an average $20,000 per month bi I I for engineering services. it was moved by Butter, seconded by Goetten, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Ayes 5, nays 0. ADJOU'^NMENT It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adjourn the regular Council meeting at 9:17 p.m. Ayes 5, nays 0. ■ 'I . . . . .. . . '/< * > < r' ; Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor r*.'fe-.-: ' h 5,. ! , -., S"** Jr irK',’ i "•■ *•f I %■ f&m-' f K- --' •> I •i . • p' •-'% ■ ■:^V ■■* •• t-J "i- fpr Is AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, APRIL 27, 1992, 7:00 P.M. (*)Asterisk items are considered ce routine items to oe enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon request. Memos rv?garding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obta^^ed upon request from the Recorder. ROLL CALL ^/O \ 1. CONSENT AGENDA.* O. % APPROVAL OF MINOTES * 2. Regular Meeting of April 13, 1^92 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT - JoEllen Hurr Representative PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT •♦APPLICANTS**Immediately after the Council has reviewed your application please sign the three (3) original resolutions at the Recorder's desk. Applicants need not execute resolutions for subdivisions, vacations and denials. 3 4 5. #1700 Dale McCurdy, #1725 Davis Fansler Permit - Resolution 1992 Marina Licenses 4041 North Shore Drive - Variance - 4180 Bayside Road - Conditional Use MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT ENGINEER REPORT 6. MSA Designation - Leaf Street and Ferndale Road - Resolution CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 7. Bid Award Bederwood Playground Equipment 1991 Budget Adjustments 1992 Board of Review - May 29, 1992 Older American's Month - Resolution Feasibility Study Old Crystal Bay Road - Resolution Bid Award Utility Tractor * * * * 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT LICENSES (13*) BILLS (14*) ADJOURNMENT 7/7-,'**► r- ' '■ ■AGENDA FOR COONCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, APRIL 27, 1992, 7:00 P.M INFORMATION ITEMS INCLUDED IN COUNCIL PACKET Don Gronberg Request, Vacant Leaf Street Lot LMLOA Newsletter League of Minnesota Cities Legislative Wrapup Sessions registration form 1991 Police Department Operations - Financial Codified Ordinance Amendments - #97, 100, 101 --iid 102 Second Seri*-'‘S Audit Information Request Miscellaneous mail OPCOMING ISSDES AND EVENTS 04/27 - Council Meeting 1p.m. f-'." ■ .4‘ ■ I ■ 04/29 - 1992 Board of Review 7 p.m. - Council Chamoers 35/02 - Spring Clean Up 8 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. 05/02 - Police Vehicle Auction 11 a.m. Martins 66 Navarre 05/04 - Stubbs Bay Sewer Improvement Assessment - Public Hearinq 7:00 p.m., Orono High School Cafeteria 05/05 - Park Commission 7 p.m. Council Chambers 05/09 - Spring Clean Up 8 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. 05/11 - Council Meeting 7 p.m. 05/18 - Planning Commission 7 p.m. Council Chambers 05/19 - School Board Election 05/25 - Holiday - Memorial Day Observance 05/26 - TUESDAY - Council Meeting 7 p.m. M . ■■ t-: .1 j-r- 1n. r a »wm- TVi-' te'- m-iv te' w.5Sr-?' ■ ■ 4- P' p.■-«:-.. .itmiVv Planrsinc Ccninissicn PUBLIC ATTEL'CA.'.^: CITY OF ORONO * * T-* rr^ ^ .'ihlr: T-. m r. y.fe I; #• '•*- m PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFOPJ^IATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR 0"R CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS NPuME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from ager.da) 1 1' 2. An./ r. t [__' -D__- ' / ^ --------- ' ^ ^--------7'“*’*-------------------------------------------------------- 3 • ^ • j . y - ^ f y ^ ^ ‘i ' 6 a/ 4 1q N » __________ —— ^ ■E' A-^-------------------------------------------*------- 5. ,Th( i Pi/n.~f'i / i ^ 1C ( c> •' C/'(^ 6. 1 . iWv.1-mV '■ 1 f 7. '1 • 8 . ( 9. i .0. i1 1 I Slvi ■■ teiv Itsi, ii-A ■ i A At > f' 12. 13. 14. 15. i i ; 16^ 17^ 18j, 1^ 20. r '■ Im.: MINUTES OF THE REGUl.AR ORONO COUNCIL MEETIN^ HELD APRIL 13, 1992 W V>s . C'A ROLL The Council met on tne above date with the following nm^^rs present: Mayor Barbara Peterson, Counci I members Gabriel JabbKir, Edward Callahan, J. DIann Goetten and Mary Butler. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, Building 4 Zoning AdmtnIstrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, City Attorney Tom Barrett, City Engineer Glenn Cook, and City Recorder Terl Naab. Candace Row Iette was present to represent the Planning Corwnlssion. Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. % OATH OF OFFICE Moorse administered the Oath of Office to Police Officer David McNIchols and welcomed him to the Orono Police Department. (i1) CONSENT AGENDA It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, Consent Agenda. Ayes 5, nays 0. to approve the Motions for all Items adopted by consent agenda will be Included In the minutes in their respective numerical order. (*♦2) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Butler, seconded by Ma^^or Peterson, to approve minutes of the regular meeting of the Orono Council held on March 23, 1992. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#3) CABLE COMMISSION COMMENTS - RESOLUTION #3103 James Daniels and Tim Pattrin were present. Pattrin thanked the Council for sponsoring the DARE program. He went on to announce that Jennifer Watts has resigned as Cable Commission Administrator and James Daniels has been hired in her place. Pattrin explained that Daniels has notified the Executive Board regarding a misleading monthly rate. He explained that the franchise fee was included as a line item, which reflected an increase of 5*. He noted the problem has been resolved within a two week period. He introduced James Daniels to the Council. i- ;xp- I- m. MINUTES OF the REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 13, 1992 CABLE COMMISSION COMMENTS - CONT. Daniels explained that when the cable franchise was granted in the 1980s, the Cable Commission had control over rates. In the mid- 1980s a law was passed that took that rate control out of the hands of the Cable Commission and the rates were set by the market place. He explained that cable companies have a non-exclusive franchise, but basically there is only one cable company per area. He noted that there is a bill In the Committee on Energy and Commerce that would give the rate control back to the local cable commissions. Also, when the franchise Is up for renewal, under the current language the franchise need not prove that they have a viable business. He stated that they are proposing new language tnat would require the cable companies to prove that they are doing an acceptable business prior to the local cable commission granting the license renewal. He stated that Congressman SIkorski has a key vote on the bill, and he asked that the Council pass a resolution urging SIkorski to vote in favor of the proposed language. Goetten suggested they change the language in the proposed resolution to reflect that they urge Sikorski rather than convince him to vote In favor of the bill. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3103 urging Congressman Sikorski to vote in favor of the proposed bill that would give control over cable companies to the local Cable Commissions with the suggested amendment. Ayes 5, nays 0. PUBLIC COMMENTS Ralph Tully, Attorney for Nina Wi'dman, explained that Council adopted Resolution #3018 in Septc.nber of 1991 approving a final subdivision which granted additional land to Lot 6, Block 2, Foxbend. He « ated that the property is torrens property and therefore the resolution could not be fi led as adopted. A proposed sale of the property is contingent upon the plat being finalized and he asked that the Council extend the filing deadline date. Mabusth explained that there was no problem with the request. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to add this item to the agenda. Ayes 5, nays 0. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to adopt Resolution #3104 extending the filing deadline date for six months at the applicant’s request. Ayes 5, nays 0. F f <• i^-.. V Vv- Ih It iIP k \ii^r."'- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 13, 1992 PUBLIC COMMENTS - CONT. Ann Cosgrove explained that she was representing both "Save the Luce Line" and the "Alliance", citizen groups which are proposing the placement of signs designating the proposed southern and northern routes for Highway 12 through Orono. She stated the purpose is to raise the consciousness of residents. She noted that she has talked with Terry Humbert of MnDot regarding the signs and he approved the signs with the provision that additional wording be put on the signs directing questions to the Alliance, and if MnDot started receiving many questions regarding the signage, they would be removed. She explained the signs will be I2"xl8" white plastic with red lettering with the Highway 12 logo, and will state something to the effect "1 of 3 proposed corridors for the Highway 12 relocation". She requested that the Council consider paying for the signs, approximately $200.00, and authorize that someone at the City help locate the routes. Jabbour asked If she felt the Alliance would lose credibility if the City became Involved. Ann stated that the other co.mmun to help with funding, and the sponsored by the Alliance. ties affected would also be asked signs will read that they are Butler asked if MnDot had newcomers to the area. concerns aoout the signs confusing Ann stated MnDot did not address tnat concern. Jabbour asked when the Alliance would need a decision from the CounciI. Ann noted they would need a decision within a couple of days. Callahan suggested they review the sign ordinance for compliance. Ann announced that the Alliance will hold an open house on May 3, 1992 from 1:00 to 3:00 p.m. at the Independence City Hall to answer questions by residents. u s': '?!■ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 13, 1992 (#4) #1521 STEPHEN LOMBARDOZZI, 115 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD - REQUEST TO EXTEND PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL - RESOLUTION #3105 Stephen Lombardozzl was present. Moorse explained that the applicant is requesting an extension of preliminary subdivision as he was out of the Count'*y at the time the approval had expired. Mabusth noted that there is one change, the expired resolution was approved under the former park dedication fee ordinance. Callahan directed staff to recommend a policy concerning these extensions as there may be many more due to the changes going on within the City. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to adopt Resolution #3105 approving a request for an extension of preliminary subdivision for one year for #1521 Stephen Lombardozzl of 115 Old Crystal Bay Road North. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#5) #1632 FULLERTON PROPERTIES INC., 2225 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - REQUEST TO AMEND COVENANTS Moorse explained that the applicant had requested an amendment to the covenants previously but had been informed that he would need the approval of the other owners within the subdivision, "^hat has been obtained. He stated that the owner has already combined Out 1ot A with his property so that can be removed from the covenants, and the owner Is requesting that Council consider Outlot B be allowed to be split In half and given to adjacent owners if it is determined that the roadway is not needed in the future. Mabusth clarified that the owner is requesting that the southern Outlot B be divided in half and fee ownership transferred to property owners to east and west of road outlot if the City determines It unnecessary to maintain for future roadway. She stated that there Is no reason to give up the easement at this cimo, and at the time the City should agree to such, the owners would file a lot line rearrangement to divide the outlot. B,-' It was moved by amendment to the Ayes 5, nays 0. Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to approve the covenants of the Shadowood plat as presented. ii. 7 = \ f i- Kr- f^‘-- &•'' • P. K' - • MINUTES OF THE REGULAR OKONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 13, 1992 (#6) #1700 DALE MCCURDY, 4041 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCE Mrs. Dale McCurdy was present. Moorse explained that this is an application for a variance to construct a secured ;>tory deck whicn was reviewed by the Planning Cofivnission and CouncI I but because of the iack of an updated survey, no action was taken. He stated that the appiicants have now provided an updated survey. Mrs. McCurdy stated that when the application was reviewed by the Planning Commission, they were unaware that an updated survey was required. It was moved by Butier, seconded by Goetten, to refer Appiication #1700 tor Dale McCurdy of 4041 North Shore Drive to the Planning Commission for review. Ayes 5, nays 0. Jabbour asked staff if a certified survey and hardcover inventory are listed as required information for variance review. Mabusth advised that this requirement is listed on variance applications and that this application was received as a special request by the applicants that they not be required to provide an updated survey. (#7) #1717 LAWRENCE W. & ARLISS A. GADBAW, 699 MINNETONKA HIGHLANDS LAND - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3106 Mr. and Mrs. Gadbaw were present. Moorse explained that this is an application for a variance to construct a carport addition which would add 650 square feet of hardcover In the 75-250’ zone, which already exceeds the allowed 25%. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the application based upon the hardships presented. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3106 for Application #i/l/ for Lawrence am. Mfiis>» Gadbaw of 699 Minnetonka Highlands Lane to allow construecI on of a carport. Ayes 5, nays 0. P.;*r ;■’N- •i • 7- j-v. ■i- Ir MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORON^ COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 13, 1992 (ia) #1721 ALBERT HANSER, 1685 FOX STREET - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION #3107 Meridith Howell and Mark Gronberg were present appIicant. to represent the Moorse explained that this is a five lot subdivision request. Mabusth explained that the subdivision will be served by a private road. The applicant has asked for special consideration to use the existing curb cut that serves Lot 1 allowing for two accesses, and the Planning Commission agreed because of the uniqueness of this property. The lot IIne between Lots 1 and 2 wi I I be realigned to provide for 200' width at the shoreline. The guest house Is recognized as a non-conforming structure as it does not meet the required 100’ setback from the shoreline of Tanager Lake defined at 929.4’ elevation. Also, the septic system for the guest house has not been located and the approval resolution will condition that the septic system be replaced within one year of final plat approve I. Jabbour asked why the plan shows the property platted to Tanager Lake. Gronberg explained that it will be shown on the final plat as a wetland area with a drainage easement ever the area. Butler asked If Easement also. we would require a Flowage and Conservation Mabusth confirmed that would be required. Goetten asked about the main drive encroaching the wetlands. Mabusth explained that the wetland In that area has been defined at the 932.3’ elevation and that the 28’ wide road will be 26’ + from the wetland elevation. Goetten asked how far the guest house was frorii the lot I ina. Mabusth noted it is approximately 10’, another reason to classify the structure as non-conforming. Goetten reiterated that this subdivision does not guarantee riparian rights. Butler a^ked how close the public crossing or fishing area of the railroad track was to Lot 5. i I- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 13, 1992 ZONING FILE t1721 - CONT. Mabusth noted that the area was further west and there is a drainageway and expansive wetland that acts as a natural barrier to protect this property from trespassing. Jabbour stated that a recent major subdivision within the City of MInnetrlsta has proposed extensive dredging to provide riparian rights and felt the LMCD should be notified of the City of Orono’s position on this property. Mabusth non they would send a copy of the fina approving th . plat. resolution Howell questioned the reference to riparian rights. Butler explained that the current owners may not consider the property as having riparian rights, but future owners may consider the prospect. Howell asked if they were not setting themselves up happen by requesting a 200’ width at the shoreline. for that to Jabbour noted that was why he asked about platting the lot to Tanager Lake but was informed that area is a marsh. Gronberg asked if the water level were to go down to allow for a 26’ setback to the tennis court, if it could be considered a conforming structure. Mabusth noted that any improvements to the tennis court would need to be approved by the City as it is considered a non-conforming structure, but in the future the applicant could present facts that may reflect differently. Jabbour felt they should not encourage the applicant to consider alternatives to reduce the water in that area, and stated that there has always been a problem with Fox Street and it should not be top priority of the Public Works Department to maintain the culvert under that roadway to ensure the tennis court be maintained In a dry area. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to adopt Resolution #3107 for Application #1721 for Albert Hanser of 1685 Fox Street, granting preliminary subdivision approval. Ayes 5, nays 0. f-'-' '■} v'.' f \V- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 13, 1992 (#9) #1722 HOWARD EISINGER, 3245 WAYZATA BOULEVARD - RENEWAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3108 Mr. Eisinger was present. Moorse explained that this is an apoi ication for renewal of a conditional use permit to allow grading and filling of 100,000 cubic yards on a 12 acre site. Staff has recommended approval be limited to 10,000 cubic yards. Eisinger requeslied that Council reconsider the setforth limiting the time of hauling. restrict ions Rowlette explained that the Planning Commission was very concerned with trucks being allowed to haul during rush hour times. Mayor Peterson felt they should uphold the hauling originally approved. schedu I e It was moved by jacbour, seconded b> Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution lf3108 for Application 41 722 for Howard Eisinger of 3245 V'ayzata Boulevard, approving a renewal of a conditional use permit to allow grading and filling. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#10) SHORELAND ORDINANCE .RESPONSE FROM DNR Gaffron explained that the DNR has responded to the shoreland regulations submitted to them. The DNR would like the City to Justify the 18* steep slope versus their 12* and noted they would need to review the code for justification and absent that, may consider changing the percentage. He stated the DNR would I ike the City to require a 10’ setback for lockboxes. Butler stated that many times thac is not possible. Callahan suggested that they propose the wording to reflect 10' or far back as possible. Gaffron stated he would inform the DNR of the CouncII's views on this issue. Gaffron went on +o state that he attended a meeting last Thursday of the LMCD’s Shoreland Technical Review Committee at which approximately half of the cities were represented. He stated that the 11 cities working through the LMCD as a group apnear to be drafting individual ordinances rather than a single ord'nance as a group. 8 I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 13, 1992 SHORELAND ORDINANCE RESPONSE FROM DNR - CONT. Mayor Peterson announced that Gaffron was gu^rst Tonka Report on the shoreland regulations and d.d speaHe'^ on the a very good job. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT A) Mayor Peterson asked when the newsletter would be se^t out MJorse stated it would be mailed cut th.s week B) Goettan explained that she visitea the Hennepin County Commissioners’ oMIce to discuss the Corcoran Ash Project. She found out that the woman addressing the Council on this issue is actually a paid lobbyist working for the Municipal Services Corporation. She noted the Commissioners did not vote on the issue that day and have since referred the issue to Committee. jabbour felt that the Council acted in haste with regards to this issue and felt that tne City was lobbied inappropriately. He suggested they adopt a policy on conmunication to avoid ■ni sundsrstand I ngs ir the future. The simples": communication route is to advise the City Administrator, who can then pass the Information on to the other Communit es Cal Iahan agreed tha^ the Counc i I had not reviewed the request as they should have done. He suggested that Council be notified prior to adoption of unusual requests of the specifics of such a request. C) Jabbour presented pictures styrofoam floating in Lake Minnetonka He stated that he did approach the LMCO last year with a concern regarding this issue and noted they did not do anything to correct the problem. He indicated that a major dock company in the area is considering the addition of floating docks to their lino of products which would expand the use to the private sector. He suggested the Council request an opin on from the City Attorney outlining the City’s authority with regards to governing lakeshore activities such as this. JoEMen Hurr stated she currently is the Chair on a new environmental committee and felt this issue should oe addressed by that comm 11 tee. Callahan suggested they discuss this issue at the next Lake Use Comm 11tee. D) Callahan noted the agenda for the LMCD’s meeting of April 11th notes an application by Lake Minnetonka Boat Sales to be allowed to expand boat sales at the faciIIty In Orono. He suggested staff check into this. u . 'I » fr.v ■ t i'-i f- f«nl » MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 13, 1992 MAYCR/COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. Jabbour stated that the Boat works has moved its service department to Delano and thought perhaps the expanded saies would take place at the Wayzata facility. E) Callahan stated that upon review of minutes of the Park Commission meeting, he noted that appiicants are now required to have a hearing before the Park Commission to determine if the City will require a park dedication fee or dedication of lard. He stated he did not want the applicants to be subjected to a third hearing. He also felt it was not the Park Commission’s place to determine if an application was a subdivision or not. He pointed out that the Commission appears to be acting as arbitrator between OBA, the Hockey Association, the School District and the City with regards to the proposed balI fields on the school property. Goetten suggested they provide the Park Commission with some guidance. Butler felt It was appropriate for the Park Commission to act as an arbitrator in this matter if they chose to do so. Moorse explained the Park Commission initially got involved because of the possible ball fields in that area, but other issues were Interrelated. He noted that the proposal will be brought to the Council In the near future. (#11) REQUEST FOR PAYMENT #4 - HIGHWAY 12 FRONTAGE ROAD It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to authorize the payment of $5,650.43 to B 4 D Underground, Inc. for work done on the Highway 12 frontage road. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#12) BID AWARD BEDERWOOD PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT Moorse requested that the Council table this item until the next meeting so the Park Commission Member could be present. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Goetten, to table the bid award for Bederwood Park playground equipment. Ayes 5, nays 0. fe^'fL. l-^' &I r Ik MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 13, 1992 (#13) STUBBS BAY SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT - ASSESSMENT ROLL - RESOLUTIONS #3109 & #3110 Moorse explained that the Counci I ts requested to adopt two resolutions, one to establish the public nearing for the Stubbs Bay sanitary sewer project, and the second to adopt a proposed assessment roll to be sent out to the affected property owners. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3109 establishing the public hearing date be set for May 4, 1992 at 7:00 p.m. at the Orono Cafeteria for the proposed assessment for the Stubbs Bay area sanitary sewer. Ayes 5, nays 0. Rowlette asked what the time table was after that hearing. Moorse explained that after the hearing there was a 30 day appeal period. He stated they expect to begin work mid-summer. Butler stated that she received a call requesting that the Council consider assessing less than the total assessment per unit price. Callahan stated that if it were one individual they were considering. It might be feasible to reduce the average slightly lower to further reduce some of the assessments. He suggested that the numbers In the resolution be raised to allow for flexibility. Jabbour clarified that the numbers In the resolution reflect a contingency. a I ready Callahan suggested that the figures should be increased so the Council Is not locked Into a number that is too low in the event the project needs to be revised. Jabbour felt that a notice should be sent with the resolution to the home owners explaining how the Counci I arrived at the figures. Gaffron passed out a copy of the proposed letter to be sent out with the resolution. He also informed the Council that a property owner on Westlake Street has indicated an ability to combine his two parcels to create one, therefore he would be assessed for only one unit, but this would not take place until fall 1992. 11 i. I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 13, 1992 STUBBS BAY SEWER - CONT. Moorse explained that the resolution also sets forth that a newly created bulIdable lot within the area would be charged 100% for the sewer, and if the availability of sewer enables a subdivision or a vacant lot to be bul Idable, the owners of such property would also be assessed 100% for sewer in the future. Jabbour stated that since the Council has ■‘i^ated *:o the residents that they would participate with the cost, they should do so, but perhaps they should give them a percentage that they will pay and stick to that amount. Callahan suggested that to ensure flexibility they consider adopting a resolution stating the homeowner to pay 100% of the cost. Hurr felt It was unfair to charge a future buiIdable lot more than currently developed lots are being charged. Moorse stated that the magnitude of benefit is much greater for a newly created bulIdable lot. Rowlette stated that residents attending the last meeting were angry until the Council stated they would pay a portion of the cost. She felt the assessment hearing would not be well received If residents were notified In advance that the City would not pay a portion of the cost. She felt they should not inflate the assessment and Increase the percentage the City pays to make the City look good. Callahan indicated he only suggested the 100% assessment to allow greater flexibility should a major change arise. Jabbour suggested by letting the residents know up front that there is a contingency built Into the dollar amount, they may be more sat IsfIed. Cook thought It is good idea to remind residents that the easier the easement acquisition is the more the total cost will be reduced. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3110 declaring cost to be assessed and ordering preparation of proposed assessment roll. Ayes 5, nays 0. Jabbour directed staff to review whether COBG funds could be used to help residents In need pay for the sewer project. KTNUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 13, 1992 ■V: ».'T i ■ '■V.. r'fe*' - (#14) SUPPORT OF GRANT APPLICATION FOR WECAN - RESOLUTION #3111 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3111 In support of a WeCAN grant application. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#15) STEP ADJUSTMENT - LIN VEE It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Cal lahan, to approve a wage rate adjustment for Lin Vee from Level 4, Step II ($11.109/hour ) to Level 4, Step III ( $1 1 . 726/hour ) effective April 23, 1992. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#16) STEP ADJUSTMENT - OFFICER JAY DEMBOUSKI It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to Increase Officer Jay Dembouskl’s salary from $14,265 per hour to $16.05 per hour as of April 6, 1992, as per the 1992 LELS contract currently in effect. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#17) APPLICATION & CERTIFICATE OF PAYMENT NO. 2 KRAUS-ANOERSON GRESSER CONCRETE/MASONRY STEININGER CONSTRUCTION It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve City Hall and Public Works Buildings Applications and Certificates of Payment No. 2 for March Construction Manager fee and reimbursable expenses to Kraus-Anderson in the amount of $20,541.61; and for Public Works building footings work to Gresser Concrete/Masonry in the amount of $12,600.00; and for site preparation to Steininger Construction Co. In the amount of $45,000.00. Ayes 5, nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT Barrett requester Council adjourn to Executive Session to discuss possibie Ii11 gation. (»#18) LICENSES It was moved by Butler, following I I censes: seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve the F. Special Event Permits: Minnesota Inf I Center Norwest Bank Wayzata Office Septic System Installer: Don’s Backhoe & Exc. Elmer J. Peterson, Co. S'" ** • s V; V • f ■ #m- &H^-‘- m:r-^'\ S-” i.>. r ?■ am.u U ir 1^'& v/- ifr K-. x'\ Ir i-.. Sliiia' MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CRONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 13, 1992 LICENSES - CONT. Site Eva Iuator/Desiqner: Percor, Inc. Don’s Backhoe & Exc. Motion, Ayes 5, nays 0. (««19) BILLS It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, payment of the All Funds Account. Ayes 5, nays 0. to approve ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Butler, seconded by Jabbour, to adjourn the regular Council meeting at 8:45 p.m. Ayes 5, nays 0. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hal I In, City Clerk 't. ‘I"r 1^ V- . ft ■^8t^*S^^-V-ii i.. t .a:-.. To:C/yChairman Kelley and Planning Commission MembersC^> Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Date: Subject % Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Admini^^tocs^^ ^ 7. April 23, 1992 (7\ #1700 Dale McCurdy, 4041 North Shore Drive - Variance \ '*5? Status of Application At the February 10th meeting of the Council, members voted to deny Mr. McCurdy's request for Council to act on the current application without an updated survey. McCurdy was further advised that Council would allow 60 days for him to submit an updated survey in order to complete the variance and building permit review (April 10, 1992). McCurdy submitted to the City an updated survey and hardcover inventory on March 31, 1992. The application was re-scheduled before the Council at their April 13th meeting at which time Council directed staff to place the application on the Planning Commission's agenda for the upcoming April 20th meeting. Council advised the applicant that the application would then be presented for Council's review at the April 27th meeting as applicant expressed concerns with further delays in review of application. Please review Exhibit G, applicant's addendum submitted since Planning Commission review. Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover excess exists within 75-250' setback area where additional structural hardcover is proposed. No increase in hardcover will result with this proposed construction. Current Hardcover Review Based on revised survey and updated hardcover inventory submitted on March 31, 1992: 0-75' setback area = 7,600 s.f. Allowed = 0 s.f. Existing = 1,022 s.f. or 13.45% (In 1986 review, staff reported no hardcover within the 0-75' setback area.) 75-250' setback area = 18,110 s.f. Allowed = 4,528 s.f. or 25% Existing = 6,990 s.f. or 38.6% (1986 staff hardcover inventory reported 5,907 s.f. or 28.6%.) i,'-r Zoning File #1700 April 23, 1992 Page 2 of 2 List of Exhibits A - Staff Memo 11/14/91 B - Council Action Notice 2/14/92 C - Hardcover Inventory D - Current Survey Dated 3/11/92 E - Resolution #2102, Approval of 19B6 Variance F - Draft of Planning Commissian Minutes for April 20, 1992 Meeting G - Applicant's Letter to Council Dated 4/22/92 H - Building Permit #6318, Permit for Garaqe Approved in 1986 with Stipulation that 250 s.f. of Plasti- Sheeting be Removed 'it ri V •/. »■ Brief Review of Application Mr. McCurdy seeks approval for the construction of a second story 7' x 18' deck to the street side of his residence to be placed over an existing patio resulting in 119 s.f. of additional structural hardcover. Mr. McCurdy completed the removal of some 250 s.f. of existing hardcover in the 1986 review. It was determined in that earlier review that the excess of paved areas on the property was needed to provide safe access from the site based on the topography and the location of the access onto County road (review Exhibits E and H). The majority of the Planning Commission denied the application because of the excessive hardcover on the property and that applicant proposed no additional removals. The applicant readvised the Planning Commission that no new hardcover has been added to the site since the 1986 approval and that no additional hardcover is proposed with the current application. Options of Action To approve as proposed based on the findings set forth in the approval resolution of 1986, Exhibit E, with a disclaimer that if applicants propose future improvements to this property resulting in additional hardcover thac applicant will be expected to remove existing hardcover either equal to or greater than proposed improvement, OR To approve subject to the applicant agreeing to remove areas of existing hardcover (119 s.f. '= area of proposed improvement, or s.f.). Council Action To provide direction to the staff so that staff may propose the appropriate resolution for Council action at their May lith meeting. m r r i \. r fir. V* f,.- •V* »i'' mt t To;Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Mcorse Prom: Dates Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Buildinc: 6 Zoning Administrator November 14, 1991 #1700 Dale McCurdy, 4041 North Shore Drive Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.22, Subdivision 2- - Hardcover excess exists within 75-250* setback area. Hardcover variance approved December 8, 1966 (Resolution #2102), Exhibit J for a detached garage. Hardcover facts were developed by stiff for that review. They were as follows : 75-250* setback area = 20,625 s.f. Existing hardcover = 5,907 s.f. or 28.6%* ♦Refer to Exhibits 1(1) s .2). Applicant has submitted the same hardcover facts develop* d by staff in 1986. Current application proposes = 119 s.f. of structural hardcover ro be installed over existing hardcover (patio ). No net increase in hardcover. Section 10.03, Subdivision 14lc) - Lot coverage allowed = 3,094 s.f. or 15% Existing = 2,180 s.f. or 10.5% Proposed = 2,299 s.f. or 11.4% No lot coverage variance required. ••1'; List of Exhibits i Exhibit A — f- t Exhibit A(l)- fj.Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D f Exhibit E - Exhibit F - 1 Exhibit G — ).Exhibit H -s f Exhibit Id)— Exhibit 1(2)— 1 *■ L,'Exhibit J — t'Exhibit K - Exhibit L — Exhibit M • m i Exhibit N — Application Applicant's Addendum Property Owners List Plat Kan Survey Adjacent Property Owners Acknowledgment Form Survey for Addition 1976 Sewer As Built Hardcover Fact Sheet Prepared by Staff for *86 Application f t-' > Vi. : ' m :"■<> ■ ? *■ Sv i"t-; >• .■ ' Zoning File #1700 November 14, 1991 Page 2 Description of Request Applicant seeks approval of a 7'xl8' second story deck to be installed to the north or street side of the existing residence. The deck will be located over an existing patio resulting in no net increase of hardcover. Improvement will result in a 119 s.f. of additional structural hardcover on the property. Lot coverage with the proposed deck will be at 11.4%. Review Exhibit F. Applicant claimed that the deck was originally proposed at the time of the construction of the addition to the west side of the residence in 1976. The patio doors were proposed at the second story lev?l. Staff can find no record of the original plans that would show the proposed second story deck. Applicant has been asked to provide a copy of the those plans ':i>x our review. Applicant commenced construction of the second scory deck believing that the deck was already covered in the 19/6 building permit. Applicant was asked to stop construction and to file for the necessary building permit. In reviewing the e.«.isting property and the hardcover facts submitted for the 1986 review, staff has noted errors in those original calculations involving the 0-75’ setback area. In addition, the current hardcover facts do not reflect the driveway in its current configuration that were installed at the time of che construction of the detached garage. Staff has asked that Mr. McCurdy provide updated survey and hardcover facts for the current review. Mr. McCurdy has advised that the updated survey and hardcover review will cost more than the second story deck. Review Exhibit A-1. ’ipplicant has filed the application submitting the former hardcover facts asking for special consideration as the proposed imprcvements will not result in an increase in hardcover within the 75-250' setback area. If it is the intention of the Planning Commission to recommend approval of the application that results in 119 s.f. of additional structural hardcover, your options are as follows: A.To recommend approval of second story deck addition and to advise applicant that if other improvements are proposed at some future date, applicant will be responsible for providing an updated survey and hardcover inventory for the property. .. -.i > P r-'. f-r' i' •• r ->. • ^ iCi,' f€- .v !S#- Zoning File #1700 November 14, 1991 Page 3 B.To recommend approval of the deck addition only upon receipt of an updated survey and hardcover inventory. In the original 1986 variance application, the approval was conditioned upon applicant providing an access and utilicy easement over the sewer lines that intersect the property. Review Exhibits G and H. Applicant is asked to ad' ise if an executed access and utility easement has ever been submitted to the City for recording. Staff can confirm the removal of 250 s.f. of landscape hardcover along west side of house. Hardship Statement Please view Exhibit A. r. I k ff'Zoning File #1700 February 5, 1992 Page 4 Additional Exhibits Exhibit 0 - Planning Commission Action Notice 1/28/92 Additional Comments and Planning Commission Recommendation Please review the Planning Corronissic Minutes of January 21st for more detail on the review ot this application. The Planning Commission adviced the applicant that the application was incomplete as an updated survey and hardcover inventory had not been provided with submittals. The earlier discrepancies in the hardcover calculations on the property from the earlier review were dijcussed. The applicant advised the Planning Commission that the improvements proposed are net located within the 0-75' setback area. Planning Commission noted that there are questions or discrepancies concerning hardcover within the 75-2. setback area where the improvement is located. Members voted unanimously to deny Mr. McCurdy's variance application finding it incomplete and further directed that since this applir cion involves after-the-fact construction, the partially constructed deck be immediately removed and that pat:c doors be installed with appropriate protectiv ’e barriers. Mr. McCurdy advised the Planning Commission that he would n'i>t continue with this application before the Council and that both partially constructed deck and patio c- ers shall remain in its present hazardous condition. Staff has advised Mr. McCurdy tnat 3ll after- the-fact applications must go before the Council (refer to Exhibit 0). Options of Action Available to Council To approve the application as requested by applicant and to not require an updated survey and hardcover inventory until applicant proposes additional improvements at a future date or To indefinitely table all action on the variance application until applicant has submitted an updated survey and hardcover inventory and to direct staff to require the immediate removal of the partially constructed deck and to require the installation of temporary protective barriers for existing patio doors. ri. 1 APPLICATION NO. 1700 CITY OP ORONO P,0, Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 473-*’357 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION 55323 r'.U ate of Notice:2/14/92 TO:.'ale McCurdy 4041 North Shore Drive Moundf ^!N 55364 k TYPE OP APPLICATION: After-the-Fact Varia ce DATE OP MEETING: February 10, 19 92 VOTE: 4 For 0 Aga’-.^t pr V •. i-' :•? l:m mL CODNCIL ACTION - MOTION: Council voted to deny your request to not provide ar updated survey for the proposed construction of a second story deck to the street site ;t your residence. Council further advised t’-at they would allow y -. sixty days to submit an updated survey to complete *-he variance and b .ilc.ing permit review (April 10, 199?:. If you have failed to provide an updated survey by the deadline, staff has been directed to proceed with wuatever appropriate legal action is necessary to require the removal of the partially constructed deck and to provide a safety barrier for the secon story patio doors. Please contact my office if you ha .e any questions pertaining to the directives of the Council. cc:Tom Barrett, City Attorney Lyle Oman, Building Official Bruce Vang, Field Inspector h:. k- % k- U.A^ .- V.->, A'c C^'/<£> f HARDCOVER CALC'JUTIQN 'HORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' C7S-250j J 25 E xisting Hardcover in Zone V 0 - ■/ Z <j ^ c*'n^innn' > O '■- ^ u o /^ •House 2^. 7 LENGTH 5". 7 2^. i /f. Y 3. Garage c. Driveway diaCK D. Sidewalk ____ ? ? E. Patio / 3eck PiTtO F. Landscape AREAS UrJOERLA IN SY : _ PLASTIC ■ SHEETING A.p. r/f-y G. Other 7 y. 2 (- ‘i^]= WIDTH 7 . 2. X 7 X /. 5 X 2V. ^ > X 32. S /Y2 (-S) V# • ^2. ^ X _ X A X Total Hardcover in Zone d" 7 f. / s. - ^r . { / 7. O - ‘ ^ • 4 I /r^. 7 r r >1# t . I 7. 6 . r . 3 • F 7 7 J- ^ s.f, Z1Z5_ s.F. f' f- y y W • • I S t F * ^ ST /72 S.F. 2 (2 7 cr w I • • L . r . j • r 7 7 <2 5. F, ^ c 3.F. Total Property Area in Zw;e /r^. //a t S.F. A iT -r! I V \cr. d7CO A E> «. .« ».»• • h.. V t'Vw it' k- i.k hV ii^ 1"^ U> l:fc‘ Ev"’ !.4hv "' ; ■;% [ffcv,: i> ’'•A-.' fj' ’ -V •, k'K- life'.' /^o Cci/eo T HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE one ) 75-250' ^o0~500' 50Q-1COQ' E xisting Hardcover in Zone House X 5^^. F. LENGTH V.'IDTH • « W • I S. F . S.F. Cxyoop JT<^J V/X 7./V?S.F. :•. Garage X S.F. I E.\ I V E >(m f /Y. V X /y X 2 0 2- S.F. 2 O €„ S.F. D. :> I dewalk ■Z <N X 6"^S.F. / o X Zc?S.F. £. P atio / Deck X S.F. X Z5- /.V I r F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN 3 Y PUASTIC ' SHEETING A G. Other A 1 >f « V V S.F. X S.F. f = yj S • F • X S.F. lAL Hardcover in Z ONE #• ^ L» # f“ * PpoPERfv Area IN ZCNE c c .j . r « /022. ^. _ •3 X =*1iA X k c* /T > 4 i f" / >'C<. ^ ^ <^2: 3 ’-2 (f* -? 2. .» r** A • *t» -•.^f •✓* ^-'-.*« f -'•• * .«V ^v>Mi „.. v^<- .^y-Ht' City of OROrVO r.^*3jnr ■' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4^ ‘rj , tr . ^ , ^^-*TC.yc;r >' B-, ■. v. ’:■ MDMICXPAL WfMIVO COOB '■’ •.;■ >'•- ,i.- lO.M/ BOBDXVISXOli 2’ .FM«10S8 "••-;. . ,.■I-n*f 1.T -th^ A RBSOLUnON CRANTXllC A VARXABCB TO J-'x y iClty iwB»«AsjD«l.'J.’ HcCutdy^(b.r«ln.fter 'the ' {:“ 5rono^he?iiM«tir 'City') end legally deecrlbed es followe. n' ^ ^ Lote 7 end 8. and that P**^ f;VoYlo«a\^ CoMonci^J^^at lying Northerly «* %“"« S^rlt line o* ealJ Eaet.rly 11 leet th« intersection of th€ lit 91 thence Southerly along with the Northerly line of 5 fSet to the point of (hereinafter 'the property*); and MOW, THBRBFORB, BB IT ABSOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota t rXBDIBGS 1. Thia application eaa reviewed as Zoning File 11008. 2, The property ia located in the LR-lB Single Pan>iiy Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Comaission reviewed this Novenber 17, 1996, and recommended approval of the propose variance based upon the following findings! A) The steep sicp-e on the property make it unfeasible to locate a deta-;hed garage elsewhere on the property. IL J5*,hr4V-V.’y i7*N'crtrsfcT ’. iri*vV. ^?hr.%n*rigf i?St%^‘*lihlclV51?^rng^“h\n\h^^^ T^I^ssable. Page 1 of 4 - • WBBRBASt the applicant has applied v.ri.nc. ^."““clpll loSfn, «hic^“^^^"^^n°c"r;.« S:?Si:,iJ‘lh thV»-2tr l‘’/h.‘.horV««.lh rin. In .xc... ol th. 251 hardcover limit normally allowed.-«.. A 'ifi % w ">4 a •r * 'It • V . ^ •'3 ' vjfl •i •-.’iv _________________ '* ' • 'I f »,^ VI '•4, '* >*^*‘ '* "V ^ ‘ ■ . * • ‘ \ \VORONO.' City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2102-------------- ^ : •»V ^‘• V'l ' K4 1 1■ .*• nrxi.» ij*'-.. *4 Thtt Cltiy Council has considersd this application including reconmiendation« of the Planning Commiaalon, b^Cl conunent. by the applicant »nd the aff^t S?'Sfe proceed variance on the health, nafety and welfare of the coonunity. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions nronArtv are oeculiar to it and do not apply generally to other ?ro?ert^y In thi» zoning district; ''®ir*no^would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to "«^9hboring property Sot merely serve as a convenience to Jg necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or r® necessary to preserve a substantial property applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. COaCLOSICMS, ORDER AMD COMDITIOKS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby orants a v!San« to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, lubdlvision 2 to permit the construction of a will increase the hardcover in the 75-250* lakeshore *°”®.f® 28.6% where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed, subject to the following conditional 1 Aoolicant shall remove the approximately 250 s.f. of plastic w?t of th. hou... H.rdcov.r .llowed on th. proporty 1. as follows! 0-75' Lakeshore Setback Zone: None 75-2S0* Lakeshore Setback Zone: %it Existing municipal sewer lines on the property limit the potential locations for a detached garage. D) Due to the .teep .lope up to the roadway sight distance, it is necessary to provide a ®Pf?” near the house so that vehicles can travel forwar p I • < Rouse West Sidewalk Front Patio Driveway Existing Garage East Sidewalk Proposed Garage '/ IM : r«% •* * ' Page 1,063 s.f. 60 s.f. 144 S.f. 3,308 S.f. 260 s.f. 215 S.f. 832 s.f. 5,907 s.f. or 20.6% 2 of 4 V % '-.r.f. > V.. ^ . »: t *• I I ( \ m r I h%-• V A' ‘Vi - ■.Kv/.v-t •• T’n^>t‘‘- ,,•. " ^ -1^ ' - J* . #. 1^ >■;■*• . wk ^ • 4 • .Aa 4 4 4 . • . • M-A * . •» ft A» * *- \ City of ORONO nESOUUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. SIO^ ;> » , F ••;4., ^1 t*Vi H 11* r .-.i! ft r. » .< ‘ A rH<‘ !..i 75-250V I»ot Area la 20#625 ••f» SSiltiI»9 ;iS ^no nav t^rS^vJc'incltLm. '*■' 2. Applicant aha 11 grant the appropriate u^lity and acceai* easenenta for exlating aewer lines on the property. 3 The existing 1-car garage located partially within the *^^9ht- ^f^S of North^ Shore Drive i. a f subject to the pertinent ordinances governing such structures. 4 A 4ii4-hAritries aranted by this variance run with the property !:>. -Ah thVVD?IiS»nt, but »r« p«rmi.«iv. only .nd must be •xereiswl by upplle.tlon for a building p«rmlt 5"* ° ?h« dttVof Coincil .pprov.l, or thi. v.rl.nce will expire on that date (December 8p 1987). 5 Violation of or non-compliance with any ot the terms Md cindJtlon. of thin variance .hall constitute a “'Ji? Mnlng code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned applicant has */' agrees to the terms of this resolution and on his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording o^ thJsJisSiutlon in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of December, 1966. ATTESTt ■i \ ,. a 1 ^ P n ^ r Property^^^pwne r < ^ ,4V Page 3 of 4 ■f 1^' MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 20, 1992 ZONING FILE #1698 - CONT. It was moved by Bellows,^ seconde_d by ff]'«"^-J?/fnTDr?ve^^for' thi the perm,t .ssoed that permit. Ayes 6, nay* 0. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by ^ enclosed deck oe removed by July 1, 1-9^. Ay (#4) #1700 DALE MCCURDY, rEF^RRErSA^“?§ FOR AOOITIOMAt REVIEW Mrs. McCurdy was present for thi** aoplicaLion. applicants propose the ■i;,,on was originally brought b\^'oVe7he^ Planning Comm i ss i on absent an^uodated^surve^^^^ hardcover inventory as Inventory review from r-e'f;pV;r;at?on-%h- :nnirg orted-sTrve'y wss n^cessarr..e current proposal does not propose an Incre McCurdy noted 'so^^m'Tta r^w%s°done^' Ind ;ronb;rT'*She^noterthrde^^ .ntended to be .ncludedwith the 1986 addition . Rowlette noted that with the hardcover in the 0-75* zone, hardcover consisted. 1966 review, staff Indicated OX She asked of what the additional Mabusth explained J®”,^:::::;;°b"Ird°covef i nven t^rr ■ re^^?he^oe?reh?ag:'?or^h: 0-7% ■ tone includes lakeshore decking, access stairs, and part of the hv Chair Kelley asked about further hi:-cover reductions. : bu .V.r 1 \. a I; I I ■■r I ftIt . ti; MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 20, 1992 ZONING FILE t1700 - CONT. McCurdy explained they did reduce hardcover with the 1986 review on the west side of house but felt there wasn’t anywhere else they could remove hardcover. Schroeder asked about the two garages McCurdy explained they use the garage near the road during the winter because of the steep slope of the drive. It was moved by Chair Kelley, seconded by Cohen, to recommend denial of Application <^1 700 for Dale McCurdy. 4041 North Shore Drive, because of the i ntensificat'on of e/cessive hardcover on tne property. Ayes 4, nays 2. Rowlette and Schroeder voted nay. McCurdy noted that with the exception of the addition in 1986, all Improvements on the property have reen in place since 1976. Rowlette stated she would like to see the hardcover percentage reduced, however the deck is being placed over existing hardcover. Bellows asked about plans from the 1986 project. Mabusth noted they were never located. Schroeder agreed with Rowlett* and felt they could put the appIicants on notice that no additional hardcover on the property would be allowed. (#5) THOMAS LYTLE, 1935 CONCORDIA STREET - VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 7:15 - 7:22 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Thomas Lytle was present. Mabusth reminded the Commission that this appi Icat .‘m was originally tabled to allow applicant time to recons der the relocation of the lakeside deck, which he has done. The deck .low encroaches 3’ Into the 0-75’ setback zone resulting In 56 square feet of hardcover or 1X within that zone. It also increases hardcover In the 75-250’ zone by approximately 190 square feet or IX. She reviewed the location of the mature trees <n the lakeshore yard. C ‘ i r I c 0^~y\uT^ '•4-/2_ 2- (q i>~ cy -T __/ 6-A^J-CyA-^r^JLJCA^ oaJ'3'-'>— ,x^4V\_-A Jl-'U^J^Jh-^3^ ■rL_-»^j2^' , Jlrx^A^ /f^- r cTu-^' ^ Jlu^-f — yO-^*— C-VJtA-^ r X/— yt:^\-^ yr'.-?-^M^*— w Z. yl > T' y^:-Zr- O' ~X1^ A-^'i C,^'2<5ty/ </V^^ rr?■f c?Ly] yiyTvX-'^ v*% |Ccirr of ORONO f’Buading Permit AND APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY P.O. BOX 66. CRYSTAL BAY. MN 55323 473 7357 ' V r !♦ ' ZONING DISTRICT nt»e OCPAfTMENT>CPA«1 lUnijL TOST OFFICE VAN DATE _ ^ coHOigieo*i£;i j;-i'?vi < •.: •'ff 'T. iOTAP€A s :SSK^- #f<OPOSEO SETBACKS F»«)NT « SIOE| REAR L SiOE,,vs UO‘-JI A) V\nr<L. 2y- LAKE iiictt WETLANDS ACCESS NEW ^^iS'MNilj! AOENCY-APPROVTTJATf OTV COUNTY STATE PRIVATE EASEMENT property lOENTiriCATioN NO 'P'Ot ,Q'7 ' ^ “rtA ^ f 7. lot______________BLOCK__________________ SUBOiVtSlON ------ iTfrP.^llolLrc AR^|TE cT/£NGINF.ER-M w*I On^^ultt-Familv CommwfO** A IncJustnai Co^i 'uci'on P *rs (Fifmi (A<Wf«*l ,Pho«.- BUILOER (Firmi lAddrRtti iPhonpl dA: TYPE OP WORK /FiP/Lu/s.ia^ AOd*lion * Pomo<JP>RpncHate CONST TYPE BUII-DING SIZE L W -2 OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION DWELL UNITS OAR stalls ATT 06T STORIES 0 number of bedrooms SEPTIC APP DATE Esfirraied Conslrucfton Valuation permit fees BLOa PERMIT ----- 3 .oi> PROPOSED USE . REMARKS: PQ ffi/)UL *5 ^ •V II y/S.4- ^ 4J^T2jSi^ « •' Ri iRiuiT TPi ICC nrcinMC Tn rirv before framing inspection I PERMIT NO. 6318 w / . On DATE ISSUED . ^ ^ V—^— I: '/• t > ^4 '.<1 % •M */ vv INSPECTION REQUIRED O.........rooriNo B««or* o<M . ...... niAMINO rougA.M□....... □ .. ... WAtLiOARD b*^P* D ...... FINAL teNv* otcvppwcy □ .....SiTt IN«PCCTX>N WORK 8CVONO OR WITHOUT A RE- OUIRCO INSPECTION WILL BE SU» JtCT TO PENALTY INSPECTIONS MUST 9E CAUED-IN 34 HOURS IN ADVANCE WORK REQUIRING SEPARATE PERMITS PIUMBINO ........... MFCHARICAL .. WELL ......................... MPTtC...................... sewfR WATtR............ . QRAO inO A FILLING npf □□.□.□ LJ□□ acknowledgement Th € UNOff^»CNtO RFO u ESTS P€PM»SSfON TO MAX£ The PE At iMP«OVEMfNT^ SPf C»F«£0 AND OCCLAPES UNOt« penalty of law ACANOmEOOEMENT ANO ACCEPT- ANCr OF ALL information CONDITIONS AND REOU<«€* MENTS »€P«F5fcNTED ON THf3 DOCUMENT Tm6 UNOt«- SKINCO FvjPTMCR AGAfCS TO DO ALL WOP*t IN STP»C*‘ COM* PllANCf ¥VtTN AIL Q.’TY OF 0*0N0 OPO*NANCES AND 8TAT£ OF MiNNf SOT ft ft • # ' \ OO^ m<iTi riLC CANANY4NSP€CrOK PiNK-ASStBSOP •Hft aA#> Cft tp« •tnsfifts ’ft OPfCN riNANCf OOtO^PfCEiPT C«fv o* 4 Ks A- * / r > ^ AA-L' V. ’f . _ , > p-i*. i-:- To From: Date: Subject: Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator ^^^4- Z' Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoninq Administrator <P sApril 10, 1992 r racor r #1725 Davis Pansier, 4180 Bayside Road - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing ♦<? %<? Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.27, Subdivision 3 (A). Conditional use permit required for non-’-ental guest apartment proposed for residence currently under construction. List of Exhibits - A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Survey E - Floor Plan - Apartment F “ Floor Plans - 1st and 2nd Floors G - Elevation - East Review of Application Mr. Pansier recently received approval of a street setback variance for the new residence currently under construction. At the time of the variance review, Mr. Pansier was advised of the need to file a separate conditional use permit for the proposed non-rental guest apartment in the lower level of the structure-. Review Exhibits E and F. There are three accesses to the apartment. The principal access is via the principal structure either from the main entrance on the first floor level or via an access stairs from the garage. A patio door at the east provides a secondary access at grade level. There is adequate parking area on this 7 plus acre dry buildable property. In your review of the variance application, the septic design was reviewed by the on site manager and confirms adequate area for septic treatment facility for a five bedroom home. The conditional use permit would be conditioned on the apartment not being metered separately from the principal residence nor shall the City assign a separate street address. Staff RecoHooendation To approve the guest house conditional use permit for Davis Pansier for the property locatea at 4180 Bayside Road finding all standards of the conditional use permit for guest house have been satisfied. Zoning File #1725 April 23, 1992 Page 2 Additional Comments and Flamming Commission Recommenration The Planning Cominissior. voted unanimous approval of the proposed conditional use permit for a quest apartment for the residence currently under construcrion located at 4180 Bayside Road. The proposed conditional use permit met all standards of the pertinent section of the code. The enclosed approval resolution has seen drafted per the Planning Commission's approval recommendation. i.'- A RESOLDT 0:Z fjf. ^ v A CONDTIONAL USK PER MDNICIPAi^ ZOf SBCTIOll 10.27, .JUBDl/I’ ON 3 (A) FILB #172b 1 i. WHEREAS, DaviF D, Pansier and Barbara H. Pansier (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of property at 4180 Bayside Road lc''=»ted within the City cf Orono (hereinafter "City*') and legally describeu as follows: The West 23 acres of that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, liing South of the southerly right-of-way line of the Luce Line Trail. (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City of Orono for a Conditional' Use Permit to permit a guest apartment within a residence currently under construction per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.27, Subdivision 3 (A). Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, PINDIF^S 1. The application was revieweJ as Zoning File #1725. 2. The property is located in the RR-lA, Rural Residential Zoning District requiring 5 acres in area. The subject property consists of 7 p''us dry buildable acres and 12 plus acres of wetland. 3. On April 20 , 1 99 2 , .le Cron<j Planning Commission reviewed the application as proposed i i recommended approval based on the following fi: dings: a) Principal access to the apaitment area i> via the principal stcuceure Pace 1 of 4 4. 5. c) There is adequate area on the 7 plus acre dry buildable site to provide additional parkinq needs for guest apartment use. The septic design for the current residence und-^r construction will have an adequate septic treatment facility for the five bedroom home. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to the applicants for tha construe^ on of a guest/mother-in-law apartment within a new residence would not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affe'^t light, air nor pose a fire hazard cr other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding oroperty values and that the proposed level of use of the roperty will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Plann;:. t Jommission, reports by staff and comments of the appli 'ants and the affect of the proposed use on the health, ■a'^ety, and welfare of the communitv. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit per Municipal Zon'ng Code Section 10.27, Subdivisions 3 (A) to permit a guest apartment use within the residence located at 4180 Bayside Road, stJbject to the following condi*-iohs: 1. 2. 3. The proposed guest/mother-in-law apartment shall never be used for rental purposes. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, snail automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and sliall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned owners have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assign?; hereby agree to the recording of this resolu ion in the chain of title of the property. Page 2 of f \ \ $ • V f'-N r f if h. ft.. iiv> : ft T-\ 1992. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 27th day of April, ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss . COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on thi* 27th day of April, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson and Dorothy M. Flallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 4 ’I f ■4 i ■ I'**. fc.'ri ■M- Fft- % t ■i?r. ji‘ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss . COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199 , before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 4 of 4 •• 1 r' K I- • OP ORONO - GENERAL L2*ND USE APPLICATION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PROPERTY LOCATION > .*f ir Site Address y .< ^ i:) T'fysj -y Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) > j / ^ 2- 3 _ V ^ .^T-1- ^ Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. {■ APPLICANT Phone (home) H~)L, ~/ / Name 7)/Q-l/lS T) ^ Phone (work Address UiuL.<;,r>^ "D^ ■_ _ _ _ _ _ City i^i_2 47-^._.. Zip fe- • iVK"fER (if different tha* applicant)Phone (hone) Name Phone Address City Zip Date Property Acquired I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. (month/year) \ I ?-■ Vl" FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use X 7 $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration *7 TV T,r“ ‘“.y.Oi/r* u a ( * U*? UM m i$ « • -1. I. T f C* t • — ’•U U. f ' ll- l- • . I i .. . v_ V W w' ^ U • ' fu) i. 9\fV u u » ' 7 ' L,1 u* V • w '£'.V-C-k--'VA / i?6' :.iX ^01 T09:: Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain(.’J/iJ/? Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule. Renewal Fee - $100.00 (no change from original applies“arn) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant $250.00 Vacation _ _ _ _ $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _ _ _ _ $300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _ _ _ _ $100.00 Appeals - see fee scheduleOther PRESENT USE OF PROPERTYPrcotnt Zoning District Present Use of Property (< fi. - / Residential Other (specify) /vu-n DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: _^f /7 . /,. <**-7) ' - / REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtaii this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map. 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). 6. Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). 7» As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list any other persons you wish notified of this applicati .'n. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR_ _ A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. rnmt mm mm mm wm mm mm mm mm mm mtm mm mm mm ^m mm mm mm mm •mm mm m • mmm mm •tm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mmm •• mm ^m The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not *en included. Certification by Clerical Department t..at Land Use Application is ccmp>lete. Initials of Clerical Staff: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide ail information required or requested by the Zoning Administrcitor, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her )<nowledge. ' ' . Date i _Applicant's signature < OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ac)cnowl edges an5 agrees to this application and furthe authorized reasonable entry onto the property bv city staff, consultants, agentS/ commission members, nnd Council members for purposes of investigation and ve,r4^this request. Owner's signature / ) .; - / : /' Li < 4 ■Date s //S /2^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants musr. be present at all scheduled review meetings of th€> Planning Conunission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attcsnd in your place and advise the Buixding & Zoning Office of this cnange prior to the meeting. ii -< N U1 O X ; ^ f-r* o < H* a C9 O 14 O Q» X O S4 ® 14 S •4| f- O m m X tnin KM >o M o m X X > a o X •» m a In ® I iM > I 1 i- & 1%' $ M oo t m X -4o H J> X O o M O o o M •4 (V X ^ > KM X O f- o m X > r- ■< > U) M M 552S r" r" i4 r- r- o M M O i4 M I X o -f| -T1 ® M > ® ^ ^ 1.* M W X X o X HI ^ \M vn in V4 in vO X a o o o ® XXz > 2 -m > X N K > > m 2! O O X > o O XX X m — ® </)O t4 o ® C > > o O H H V4 m m m CD w4 n O O I M -n X M 2 ^4- m 3 3 o ® l-f M o » H 2 2 X rvj X 2 2 rn V4 — r- O ^ 2 X 5^ fs> ?£ X o r- o m X X 1» r“ < > Kn H4 >-« 2 O m Z Z r- f— w Z § o e o V4 ® t4 I X -n > ^ X a X X X X > o o Xnn fy>(n ® I IVJ 14 \M in in tM vr sC* Z o > o in o (/> V4 3 ^ > A* X in X X ». £ M > p- v: r- > >-» O X O 14 o ® o VM CO \M I Xo > o > O > in >o > o o Xm in in M ® I rs) 14 in in V4 in 9 i.') 14 O o o •>1 52 X o r- in (Tl X 5 r- -♦ > m M X (. o o _ m o HH 0* O 14 ® O in \M in o» >ii?*2 I ►-f X H- > ® -i I m fs» X i4 in in V4 in >o X o X c: Xm s s o X a a o p* X p > ►- X P r* in m Z X > 3 3 n o X X m m O i4 P ® vn 14 > m »-i X 3^ S 3D gv ov 5=* »-* X M > ® I m ro X *4 in in KM in X o X X •< -<2^ m m X X o X o O M > ► p fi p in fn X n -4 X »-» f X X in m o X o p r- nj P in in 14 09 s r z - 5 > Xrn r H > m m 2 n >-♦ X ® m >"• I 2 X rv> X i4 m rn Z P > ^ o o o ►- H Q Xz s *g X 2 O3 X m X rn X N - > > m X a O X > o o XX X m r- X SO > m ^ ins n n > X X ►4 >4 -1 -f P > O 14 P G) \4 in in o j M in in V4 in OD i-« > ^4 - Q fv) O 14 P ® O fv) in KM t> m ►H X X o I ^ s 2 2 > 2 X r* M m O -< m in in W4 vn p X o X M om Z >- P <J0 I rr «si X ^ -iQ Pw X X o o o rg o X P r- in m M X 2 -J m x> X m o V4 T» P ® X O r- P in KM 2 >- 1 O O X ii o ►- o X »- X > ® 2 -t I m rg m X 14 -i inin 14 in Xa > Q P r-|- o X o o o 14 H Q X2^ S 5J> :< 2 o3 X m X m > X s -< p* > m 2 O |*5S ii X O wo X *4 14 in n n > > X X 1-4 »-H O V4 P ® M P 0 1 > > )-4 Mss CP i-« x» -4 in in V4 in X o o o 3 P O 5? o r» X in X r- o -< m ® O X >r- -< n > <n g mm2 Z O 2 m m (H O 14 P ® 9» Om 3 0 0 n I Q *-*^ ® M X o 2 > m - r- •< > </) M M n n o 14 C C p ® X X o M M cn in o o I cw r X o m m r r* M > m m ® M > •^4 -Hoz o o o Hm o P o s>o rg Xm Xs X om XM P 14 o M f 5- .».Sx m I-'. % i^v.vfc m- ■. % ^■ 1-.* Vv, ;.. < ' ■- >-V»i*ff- r'.J* .'• ; ^c. CD>nXoo o 31 ^i—r“OJ uD “o r\)c -c cj r- cr m G?o Oo CO 27 “ TO w*w rvi f r- -H nn "Tl >**-• 7C 12: —1 CD CD Co 1 0 r~7 c:fvj ^ 2 e:-H -H CO -H “H m m LO ::o XJ PC?CJ (j^ 0 -n “n r—«*i—•0 CaJ m m 0 cr r-r-0 u::?0 0 a> o 4> o •"Js 'O fV> ?9m i is tr rs» ^ %a V..\ ■t ••V.. I f K If [ I:,. r r: ^■: -.A pi-. - JZZ-r-h i- rj h. iS -V t-;: 'ii: i^y*- ',•> S' r- !-r -i'- ■t . Ss ■T ■'r V-/ r & fe: I ■• Bi ' ^>:- •^:- I ■■^ »r . ■ . fe ii?- ^Oi To:Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Ot ^''V<} '‘^ij From: Date: Subject Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator April 22, 1992 1990- 91-92 Marina Licenses - Minnetonka Boat Works - Sailors World 1991- 92 Marina License - Crystal Bay Service Attached are proposed marina licenses for the above three operations which the Lake Use Committee feels are non-controversia1 at the current time. Attached also are copies of their license applications for the years noted. The issuance of back licenses for 1990 and 1991 is recommended for these operations as noted, since they applied for licenses in those previous years, have no outstanding issues to be resolved, and were all licensed in 1988, the last year Orono issued licenses. (Crystal Bay Service did not operate gas dock in 1990 due to low water). Staff Recommendation: Seconded byMoved by oeuuiiucu uy_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ marina licenses for the attached resolutions: to approve the following Minnetonka Boat Works (1990-91-92) Sailors World (1990-91-92) Crystal Bay Service (1991-92) Ayes Nayes >.■ r I L':. ^:r w 0: ■ rri ^r V ' .' > -. f't'- ‘v;:-, 'ri •N/ 0:. s f RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF TO ISSUE A COMMERCIAL DOCK LICENSE TO MINNETONKA BOAT WORKS SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOTED HEREIN FOR THE PBRJOn OF JANUARY 1, 1990 TO DECEMBER 31, 1992 WHEREAS, the City of Orono, hereinafter "City" is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota and has the authority and responsibility under Minnesota Statutes tate Statute 412, et. seq. and State Statute 462, et. seq., to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the City and other members or the public within the City; and WHEREAS, within the City there exist several commercial marinas, hereinafter "marinas" engaged in business activities including but not limited to the following: 1, The sale of new and/or used boats, boating equipment, boat accessories and recreation equipment. 2. The storage, sale, rental, lease, repairing and/cr servicing of boats and boat equipment. 3. The sale of gasoline, bait and fishing supplies. 4. The construction and maintenance of docks, boat lifts and buoys on the public waters for purposes of operating the above noted business activities and for rental or lease of such space to a limited number of the general public for storage of individually owned boats. AND WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that if unregulated, such commercxal activity on or near the public waters and on the land within the City may be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare and is therefore .subject to reasonable regulations by the City; and WHEREAS, it is the overriding concern of the City to eliminate the unique problems presented by increasing boat density, hardcover, traffic der ity, storm water runoff and noise or other public nuisances in the area of the various marinas; and Page 1 ~f 5 I- t WHBRBASr because of the geoqi.aphica 1 location of the marinas and their proximity to heavy populati T/ and t.ie access to marinas by county and city roads^ and the general use of the bays of Lake Minnetonka for recreation by way of swimming, boating, fishing and water sports by the citizens of Orono, the City regulates both the on-land activit*^ ~ of marinas and the extensions of docks and mooring areas into Lake Minnetonka in the interest of public order and to protect the life, safety and welfare of the community. The City through its regulations is not licensing boats but is only licensing the marinas to the extent the marina operations affect the general public and the adjacent oroperties within the City of Orono; and WHEREAS, the City shares concurrent jurisdiction over the primary harbor limit of the City of Orono with the Lake Minnetonka Conservation bistrict and the Department of Natural Resources of the State of Minnesota; and WHERBAS, the regulation of the navigable waters involves an exercise of po'iice power of the State, LMCD, and the City of Orono, all of which have adopted rules to ensure to all equal enjoyment of the public rights and to suppress the clashing of public and pr vate interests and resulting public disorder; and WHBRBAS, the regulations of the DNR, LMCD, and the City of Orono regulate the property rights of the riparian own-rs botli as to single ^ ^ A ^ ^ ^ A ^ 1 ^ /-S m tY. V* ,1 TTl 3 >* T n 3 O T“ Cl ^ t 0Xt0Htfamily residential owners and the commercial marina owners, to prohibiting any interference with thci public waters adjoining that property. The LMCD, DNR and City of Orono must fulfill their trusteeship over the public waters by protecting against interference by anyone, including those who assert the commonlaw rights of riparian owners, whether or not they be commercial marinas or single family residential owners; and WHERBAS, as to Lake Mirnetonka, a mutual right of enjoyment exists between and is shared by riparian owners and the public generc^lly. The marinas have no exclusive privileges over Lake Minnetonka. The only •additional private right that the marina or any riparian owner may have over the public generally is to construct one dock to the navigable depth of the public waters. There can be no dispute but that the public generally and each ri.parian owner to Lake Minnetonka nas the right to use the entire surface area of Lake Minnetonka for all suitable purposes in common with all other riparian owners. This right is a right not only to members of the public but the right to each riparian owner. This mutual right of enjoyment which is shared by riparian owners and the public generally includes the recreational benefits of the Lake such as boating and fishing therein; the riparian marina has no exclusii’e privileges to these rights; and Page 2 of 5 it* 6 I ■r;. ‘s' I g- {■'/ ■ if," ?'V WHEREAS, as the population has increased around Lake Minnetonka, and in the Twin City Area generally, it is clear that more and more people have used the lake for sailing, rowing, fishing, boating, bathing, skating, and other public purposes which cannot be now fully enumerated or even anticipated; and WHEREAS, Lake Minnetonka is capable of substantial beneficial public use only as long as all riparian users of the Lake are regulated in such a way as to ensure there is no abuse of the limited riparian rights; and WHEREAS, the marina as a commercial riparian owner only has limited riparian rights incident to the ownership of real estate berdering upon Lake Minnetonka. The marina operator has a limited right to build and maintain one suitable landing or dock, on and in front of his land, extend the same therefrom into Lake Minnetonka to a point of navigability; but, under no circumstances may he encroach into Lake Minnetonka to a point where he impairs the water's navigability for other public purposes or where he unreasonably interferes with the surface water rights of all riparians and members of the public generally; and WHEREAS, it is fu- amental that a riparian owner's rights are measured by the necessities and character of his use. The marinas, for private commercial gain wish to temporarily and, in fact, permanently alter the use of the surface water in Lake Minnetonka. Certain sections of the lake, once a source of excellent fishing, have been converted and, in fact, in the future will continue to be converted, into a commercial enterprise all to the detriment of other riparian owners and the public. The marinas present operations and contemplated operations far exceed a reasonable use of their limited riparian rights; and WHEREAS, the most general public use of the water is paramount and should take priority over excessive riparian use for commercial purposes of the lake by the marinas; and WHEREAS, the marinas have separated and disassociated from the normal riparian rights in many sections of the public waters on Lake Minnetonka by having extended their docks out into Lake Minnetonka beyond the point of navigability and have transferred those rights to others who do not have riparian rights and who are not members of the general public who obtain access and use of Lake Minnetonka by use of the public access points al - nv Lake Minnetonka. Such commercial transfers of the riparian rights i-i.e Minnetonka have resulted in an abuse of reasonable riparian access lo ^-t'ce Minnetonka. Such abuses must be qualified, restricted and subordinated to the paramount rights of the public to the public waters of Lake Minnetonka; and Page 3 of 5 fe-' . y W jfe-I-i;CV^r ,v 'f fe I W. eV' af>^- Ki . . ;•,:' •-> E’ - . '.c'jV ; f\ |,x, •r' ■< i'';v i; t'-' 1. f • !r: S^’ y'. '■; - • .>. WHEREAS, as a condition to the issuance of the 1975 commercial marina licenses^ each commercial marina operator agreed with the City in writing to an Operations Agreement outlining a three-year phased improvement program established to replace nature 1 vegetation previously removed^ to provide for adequate storm water rurioff controls, to provide for open space and vegetation buffers between the marina properties and adjoining residential properties, to provide for adequate parking and ■'.raffle control and to provide for reasonable performance standards ^elating to the non-conforming placement and use of docks and mooring spaces upon the public waters; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of the 1975 Operations Agreement are reasonable exercises of the normal police powers of the City of Orono intended to correct the previous abuses and overuses of public waters and the congested commercial marina sites, to correct for the public harm caused by such abuses and to prevent future abuse of the land or the public waters; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code regulating commercial marina operations. Section 10.41 of the Orono Zoning Code regulating the use of lakeshore business district property and the 1975 Operations Agreement are in full conformity with the applicable regulations and intents and purpose of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District's regulations for commercial marinas and the State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources' regulations for protection of public waters; and WHEREAS, the City of Orono did not require commercial dock license applications to be submitted during license years 1986, 1997 and 1989 based on the then pending Code revisions intended to eliminate the licensing requirement. License applications were required in 1988, and 1988 commercial dock licenses were issued to those marinas for which no outstanding site or operational issues were identified. License applications were required in 1990 and 1991, but licenses were not issued to any marinas in anticipation of a revised review process; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City of Orono to issue commercial dock licenses for license year 1992 and retroactively issue licenses for license yeara 1990 and 1991 to all marinas which applied for licenses during those years, regardless of past or present unresolved issues. It is the City's intent that during 1992 the City will work with each marina to develop a 1993 Operations Agreement outlining a multi-year phased improvement program to bring marinas into a higher degree of Page 4 of 5 \r i conformity with Code requirements than currently exists. Such program may include, but is not limited to, site and operational modifications in the following areas: number and use of boat slips or storage areas on land; winter boat storage; parking facilities; required yards and landscaping; sanitary facilities; lighting; hours of operation; site upkeep; fuel and hazardous materials storage and dispensation; charter boat operations; on- land boat storage; hardcover; and drainage and stormwater run off controls. NHBRBAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to set forth the above noted general conditions and concerns and the following special conditions as they relate to an application for an annual Commercial Dock License described on Exhibit A attached. HOW, THBRBPORB, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby directs the Staff to issue a Commercial Dock License according to the facts and conditions noted on Exhibit A attached. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono at their meeting on the 27th day of April, 1992. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST; Dorothy M, Hallin, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) ' 4'.'. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of April, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. i*.. 1 Hi;; Notary Public Page 5 of 5 II-‘-i’ V, Stfci CITY OF ORONO EXHIBIT A RESOLDTION NO. CONDITIONS OF ISSUANCE FOR ANNUAL COMMERCIAL DOCK LICENSE I. LICENSEE Minnetonka Boat Works» Inc. Address 1449 Shoreline Drive License Period - January 1, 1990 to December 31, 1992 II. BOAT DENSITY ■ ■ . ■ y,-.- tI-'-fnr The number of in-place boat slips, lifts and buoys shall not exceed the number shown on the attached plan. Exhibit B, and in accordance with Resolution 938, in no case shall the number of authorized boat slips, lifts, or buoys exceed the number permitted in the prior year's license. Authorized Summer Density per attached plan; Bay Browns Tanager v:W- p:: c UP t*ty 1-:S' A Transient Slips 0 0 Rental Slips 65 ^8 Company Slips 1 0 Sub-Total: Slips at Dock 66 48 Offshore Buoys 0 f' Maximum Boats in Water 66 48 Dry stacked slip for use in lake Maximum Boats in water per prior license Other Boats (for sale/service, etc.) MAXIMUM BOAT DENSITY ON LAND AND/OR IN WATER 114 119 LVJ-- i/v Exceeding this maximum boat density, or exceeding the number of permitted slips, lifts or buoys is a violation of this license subject to revocation and/or prosecution for violation of Section 5.42 Subdivision 2 of the Orono Municipal Code. f?Authorized Number of Winter Stored Boats (per prior license) rH//; • m * Per LMCD approval. City in 1989 allowed increase in boat density with concurrent parking/stormwater upgrades. Exhibit A Resolution No. Page 2 III. DOCK LAYOUT (reference Exhibits B & C attached) IV. VI. ir Wl: yl-.% iH' I' 1; VII te ir‘I i'.. I''N m. ¥■ pi”" $;t:ymk^. Maximum authorized length of main dock 100 feet (from shoreline). Docks extending beyond 200 feet and docks encroaching into required side yard setbacks are hereby specifically declared to be illegal non conforming structures which are not permitted under this license. The application does not contain such illegal structures. All such violations are subject to prosecution under Sections 5.42 and 10.41 of the Orono Municipal Code. Marina is not authorized for FUEL SALES (subject to compliance with the State Fire Code). V. Required number of OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES 68 SPECIAL CONDITIONS required for compliance with the ordinances of the City and/or the LMCD. The issuance of this license is subject to full compliance with these conditions. Failure to comply with these conditions is cause for license revocation and/or prosecution by the City. 1. The following variances were granted via Resolution No. 2683 on May 22, 1989: A.0-75' hardcover of "25,609 s.f. or 15.48%" (current corrected hardcover = 24,421 s.f. or 19.9% of recalculated 0-75' area of 123,000 s.f.) NOTE: 75-250' hardcover = 5970 s.f. or 29.9% of 20,000 s.f. 75-250' zone (See Exhibit D attached). B.Conditional Use Permit/Variance for land alterations in 0- 75' lakeshore protected area. Nothing in this license shall confer upon any person for the benefit of any property any vested right to use Lake Minnetonka or the premises in a manner permitted by this resolution, but the use of Lake Minnetonka and the premises shall remain subject to such regulations and ordinances as the City and other competent regulatory authorities shall deem necessary from time to time in the public interest. Issuance of this license is not intended as a confirmation of licensee's conformity with all ordinances regulating the site conditions and operation of the commercial use. u-.- • >>^- & ..' - ^;;i^ ,,... >•* k'-i- !•-. .. •?. , 1% ^ P.O. CITY OF ORONO License Year Box 66 r Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Phone 473-7357 /99^ Date application sent to Marina " ?./. Date application returned to City i?-q-Qi annual commercial marina license application “ Pursuant to Orono MunicipalCodeSection 5.42 section 5.42, Subdivision 2 - Licensed ^bLiness lt for any person to engage or participate m the J^^^iness or docking, mooring, or storing boats or (operating) a commercial boat dock business" without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION^- ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY JANUARY 15 OF TEE LICENSE YEAR. BUSINESS INFORMATION 1.BUSINESS OR TRADE NAME Minnetonka Scat Works div of Genmr Industries, Inc. Street Address 294 E. Grove Lane, Wayzata, TIN 55391 Mailing Address P.O. Box 549 Marina Phone 473-7305 Office Phone 2.PROPERTY INFORMATION Date Property Acquired 8/85 Marina Controls Property by: ^ fee ownership CITY OF OFOSQ Fli^Ariit OFFICE ^~-1 j0C0001 A lease from .•»! rciiV 1 U-U M V ui 'UUM : U 42S.C other (explain) L'ri' Tuj ^) h A va YOU J. vT ’W j 1 *'^'*^*.*^"i2/i: List every occupant, other than this Marina, occupying this property: Page 1 of 5 'DEC 12 1991 -A.; ’ ” •jrj -\^~s ~ '1k- 3. 4. ->;•■■ (s' y- Names of abutting lakeshore property o-^ers: Windward flarine 1442 Shoreline Dnv JNorth/We_^---------"A^oreisl Hennepin Ccxinty (Name + Wavzata af-ec^^d by Marina’s operation: other property Owners that may be af.eo- “(Name + Address 7 (Attach sheet if necessary) business organization: (Chech ^ individual ownersiiip corporation individual own«- tr------- ^ >- t"tle: ——rsT'^'^ csr and r-** — List the name of each partner or corpo. - - ______________ Arlyn Lcnen, Vice President ---------------- ■ James Farrell, g^r^-t-^rv ____________ SCA> Sutter. President,---------------—Tr^irTTsoonsible for daily operation: list name(s) of the marina manager (s) • .____________ ________ Frank Pillsbury, General Managex. Beth Whittaker. Control ler.Beth Whittaker, controller,------------------------- __________ marina is open to --------------—----- r^ssr of emoloyees on auty when t.*e List the minimum n ko -tino'season: the public during the bo^tx '5 service personnel ' dock attendants P ^rer:?::::- foTIZlas/pubUo informatxon, etc =,s:«ss «.v.« .=».« X slip rental (moorage) ------ ~ tackle sales trailer sales buoy rental (moorage) dry storage (moorage) boat launching (day-use ramp) 6. & service_ __ PM AM to PM Paoe 2 of 5 ^IARINA security is provide Mirmetc^Kfl Wnr. National Security V St ' & 1 dock information NOTE: :■*" The LMCD defined DOCK USE ^!2„atted Min^^de setbacks from property 200 ft. from 929.4 shorelm - - in ft minimum setback line extension are: q_;;o ft. from shore - • ^ setback 50-100 ft. from shore - 15 f^. setback . . ■ 100-200 ft. from shore - 20 ft. rami. 8. SHORELINE WIDTH: '^4aP_ feet. at 50 ft. cut 9. WATER DEPTH: at shore . at 100 ft. out J-0_ Ju w • 10* ------------ <^e2LSon3.1 < 0tic . )___f 1 t“,Inq 11 . DOCK CONSTRUCTION (permanent permanent piling with seasonal deck-ng permanent piling and decking --------- - m-lino metal or concrete -------g..oocen piling---------^ “~~Z ’ > ^c»r-vinQ metal deckingX wooaen decking --------- customer actual maximum dock length from shoreline: 80 Tananger Browns 1 X canopies are installed by: 9 marina no allowed •. • this application. Co»P"’y Service Boats Rental Boats Rental SUp/Sp.« Tots) Boa Boats Stored in the Water A. 1 Ati doclc slxps . b) At docks, other than sl-P c) At slides d) At lifts e) At moorings f) Other boats in water Total Boats in Water 1 41^114 J.12 114 P.i--e 3 of 5 rh* ¥ . ' - ' ll.nt*X Bo.t. Senc-1 SIIP/SPAC. Tot.lBo.t.t ftr-^ romoAnv Service Mntii riT-n/ C!f*'ir*^sd foe I#3-lC0 US6 3o«t»13. Boats Dry-3tacjcea _ _ _ __ _ a) Inside Buildings ~ -- - - - b) Outside on Racks -- - - - c) Outside - other means __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Total"Boats Dry-Stacked -- -- ’ 14. Total watercraft Availability Unit (Add 12 S 13) 114 15. Other Boats on Premises Inside 3uilding Dutside Storage „ Transient !°f f ‘ SI SS:e*^rts1or“iL‘(inventory, Total 16. Winter Storage on Premises a) Transient boatsb! Contract storage (customer'sbo.ts) c) Inventory (new & used boats) Total Inside Building Ourside Storage la Q .» • 3 < > 17. Summer Parking ft' ■' a) Retail ^^pe^°each 300s. f. over 1,000 s-f.)8 spaces minimum (+l e«u-a cars .‘'; "rspaLrperrrAvailability units (.6 X c) Launching ramp customers 10 spaces minimum per ram? (line 14)) =68 -ars cars Toral Spaces 18. Winter Parking ^ ^ Minimum 2 spaces, or retail spaces per 68 cars and natural screenxng along gii Mari P J less 10 ft. side yard and a lakeshcre yaru than 10 ft. and not more than 75 ft. 19. Describe in ^to^b^ in^ta^l^d'^this coming license etc.) and other improvements proposea _________________________________________ year: r N ' V .fjf '.iii:'ri''-'-L s"’ • Pace 4 o r*uh: te' I/.-. ■ W' .V . ■fe W. €•}- % W- &: •yvi' ^k- ■:r '^y * ■H. ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application: 1 A CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY (Per LMCD requirements) indicating the marina property and the authorized 2. A CERTIFXCATii ur ouis.v = * ^— - ,,4-hnr i the boundaries of the marina " gtora^dock use area, the location of all structures, storage areas, docks, slips, buoys,<-anlcs carkinc areas, access areas, fencing and lanoscapxuy features. The drawing shall be J’^ious all existing facilities, all changes from the season, and any changes proposed for the duration o current application- A DETAl'^UD LANDSCAPE PLAN for all setback existing =».nd proposed location and sizes of all r Ihrubbe^. . grLs areas and other foliage or landscaping t matures. 3. 4. A copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPLICATION. A COMMERCIAl MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION FEE according to the current City fee schedule. Initial Application § $300.00 Renewal Application @ $200.00 Each Boat Unit (Line 12) § $2.00/ea Each Boat Unit (Line 13) 0 $1.00/ea TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION ’) '''' ::x 1 1 </yl!w<,/ 5.LATE FEES - Renewals - Applications for renewal l“rication~ii accompanied ^ a l.a^ of .^50.0^ When a comp leti^appli cat ion is received, this Council referred to the Marina Committee for review. J^^®. will will review the Marina Committee recorruBendation and will thereafter pass upon the application. THE MARINA MAY OPEN FOR PUBLIC USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF T^ LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Oror.o Municipal Code^ the applicant hereby requests the Orono Council to review this Marina License application, and agrees and authorizes J Orono and the City's designated employees or agents to ^ the marina property at any reasonable time to perform safety and ip 3^- r t' I. k:*. i:-’ r?" Vi. fe- ' ■ h-'.-is. :\ ;■ \'r:'' Sfv i-i)':; i!m. iMlC'ims-. ► '••■' ■r. ' ■■ry- tu''' .y •^t.‘ • -ii.» • |fv •K{' i'-- • .' ^ ■ t-f .-ry--' y- »* U. ■' rP- •i,'. rv- ^• y:.-- fr CITY OF ORONO License Year p.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Phone 473-7357 /ii/ Date application sent to Marina ^ 1 j +* n r!l_ y-^;/ Liai;.«s -- - - - ^- -s, ~Date application returned to City ANNUAL COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATIO^ - Pi2xsu3nt to Orono Municipal Code Section 5. ;d. It is MAftiwivA for any Wson to engage or participate in the "business of docking, mooring, or storing boats or (operating) a commercial boat dock busin^ess" without first having obtained a license thorefor from the City. 1)991 PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLI^TION, ^^^^IRED ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CIIY CLERK BY APRIL 1 OF THE LICENSE YEAR. BUSINESS INFORMATION 1.BUSINESS OR TRADE NAME Minnetonka 3c,i t. Works div of Geninar Industries, Inc. Street Address 294 E. Grove Lane failing Address p.O. Bo:: 549 Marina Phone ____473-1305 —■ T "'uiT 1. i 1 Vt U.# ''-T1V Office Phone " “ u’r-iU « \ yy 2.PROPERTY I^^FORMATION Date Property Acquired 1 r.:^; I 'Aj? fi “• o .%• •JP‘ IMT* z It. A '•€’ /V u.* • 8/85 1 *’ * ” I.- Li «. h ; WU - I ' • 1 MA/ •« , L » Z.li T ^ WVl'l ’ 1 * Marina Controls Property by: X— fee ownership • • 4 Vi.‘. •• V leas€ from other (explain) List every occupant, other than this Marina, occupying property: Page 1 of 5 ' : * ■ - • M, \\:' *••■--•■ • -•'‘.-/•!:•>■ w LV'l'r'■*••.,' '• iiv \v-- ■ \ . I ■r .\.^-. -^;r? , V- ^ '. t * '•*. ■i ^i\ % v*\ Names of abutting lakeshore property owners: Windward Marine 1442 Shoreline Dr., Wayzata fNorth/West)_ _ _ ___ __—^- - --- - - - - - - --- - - - I ' . ' ■ Tz-r—— . TVr-o cr c I « hp> affected bv Marina's operation:Other Property Owners that may be ar^ecx;eu (Name + Adoressj (Attach sheet if necessary) business ORGANIZATION: (Check applicable item) , . r>A^ship X___ corpora.tionindividual ownership pa.-..e_^ P ------- ^ nar*-ne- or corporate officer anc their title:List the name Oi. each par^ne- u.. Arlyn Lomen, Vice President James Parrel, Secretary Walt Mahanes, President Zist name(s) of the marina manager(s) responsrbie for daily operation: Dennis Keating, General Manager Bath Whittaker, Manager of Admi List the minimum number of employees cn duty when the marrna is open o the public during the boating season. ' dock attendants _ _ _ service personnel others available for sales/public information, etc. PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY (check services offered): . repair parts and ser/ice X slip rental (moorage) —— - - - , , 1 fuel salesbuoy rental (moorage) - - - - -- , , bait and tackle sales^ dry storage (moorage) - -- X boat launching (day-use ramp) -- -- trailer sales ----- 6 .BUSINESS SCHEDULE (check appropriate items): open all year ----L. dock access 1 AM to 12 PM retail sales & service AM to PM Pcge 2 of 5 rk 7. MARINA SECURITY is provided by:Minnetonlca Boat Wor!>:3 Na tiona1 Security dock information NOTE: <>• <•'1 £■ The LMCD defined DOCK USE AREA must be shovm on the deck plan submitted with this application. Maxim-urn dock length equals 200 ft. from 929.4 shoreline. Minimum side setbacks rrom property line extension are: q-50 ft. from shore = 10 ft. minimum setback 50-100 ft. from shore = 15 ft. minimum setback 100-200 ft. from shore = 20 ft. minimum setback ?■' V . ¥’ Mi' 8. SHORELINE WIDTH: 3480 feet. 9. ,.c. " WATER DEPTH: at shore f Tanager at 100 ft. out 4.0 w • /at 50 ft. cut 1 • 3 ft.; at 200 ft. w out 4.5 e aw-' 10. 11 ACTUAL MAXIMUM DOCK LENGTH from shoreline:sn ■IV A. DOCK CONSTRUCTION [permanent, seasonal, etc.) floating permanent piling with seasonal decking permanent piling and deexing ~ wooden piling ______ metal or concrete piling metal decking marina __ ft. Tanager f. Bro\ms wooden decking canopies are installed by:customer X not allowed »> ■ It SLIPS AND BOAT UNITS List the maximum number of boats in each category. Each slip, slide, lift,Bill! -r wL. this application. 'r.- 9 Conp^ny Ser^/icc Boats Rental Dr'ats Rental Slip/Space Total Boat Ir 12 . Boats Stored in the Water 1 ^ m- V*. a) At dock slips b) At docks, other than slips c) At slides d) At lifts e) At moorings f) Other boats in water 1 14 Total Boats in Water 11 ->LLi Paej!-' 3 l^iiny ii"i ' 'r'A^t ^ ..kiu i/. .'Lti. i' I- "T- I J I 7'*, ,1,. . hk ■' »■?■: ♦• : 1 . • . 6' /V s * 'r-'' tn>i ‘ r- n' •, r^< •». • * • !%*. »•- i. -..i •*■ *'• 13. Boats Dry-Stacked for Lake Use a) Inside Buildings b) Outside on Racks c) Outside - other means Total Boats Dry-StacJ:ed 14. Total Watercraft Availability Units (Add 12 S 13) CO«p.ny service !«en..l Bo.t. Sllp/Sp.c, Tocel Boec. BOAC.S 114 .5. Other Boats on Premises a) Transient Bc’is (repair/service) b) New boats for sale (inventory) c) Used boats for sale (inventory) Total 16. Winter Storage on Premises a) Transient boats (repair/service) b) Contract storage(customer's boats) Inside Building Outside Storage Inside Building Outside Storage c) Inventory (new & used boats) Total 26 OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS 17.Summer Parking a) Retail sales/service customers 8 spaces minimum (+1 per each 3005. b) Boating customers 6 spaces per 10 Availability Units c) Launching ramp customers 10 spaces’minimum per ramp 18. Winter Parking f. over 1,000 s.f.) *=cars (.6 (line 14)) =63 cars cars Total Spaces 68 line 16a above = —cars# LANDSCAPING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS 10 ft. side yard and a lakeshore yard of 10% or the lot depth, not than 10 ft. and not more than 75 ft. eti.°^Ind^other i^p?oie^ents^p?oposed ^ t^b^ install4d'^this coming license year: «i... . .. Pat;; 4 of 5 m V ■ '■ §K Ife? • !-‘ %*.-• r; ■ & fe' ■ ?• r Ui' |s*.rK- tmw Is- l‘^‘- *1: ::,'■«>■' Va(p'" ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application: 1.A CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY (Per LMCD requirements) indicating the boundaries of the marina property and the authorized dock use area, the location of all structures, storage areas, docks, slips, buoys, launching ramps, gas pumps and tanks, parking areas, access areas, fencing and landscaping features. The drawing shall be updated each year to show all existing facilities, all changes from the previous season, and any changes proposed for the duration of the current application. 2.A DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLAN for all setback ar^as showing existing and proposed location and sizes of all trees, shrubbery, grass areas and other foliage or landscaping features. 3. 4. A copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPLICATION. A COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION FEE according to the current City fee schedule. Initial Application § $300.00 Renewal Application @ $200.00 Each Boat Unit (Line 12) § $2.00/ea Each Boat Unit (Line 13) @ $1.00/ea IGO.OO:s.oo TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION 4:^.00 5.LATE FEES - Renewals - Applications for renewal of licenses shall be made no later than April 1st of the new license r year. The City shall not accept renewal licen^ aoplicatfoni receiveH after April 1st unless the application is accompanied by a late fee of $50♦00. REVIEW PROCEDURE When a complete^application is received, this information will be referred to the Marina Committee for review. The City Council will review the Marina Committee recommendation and will thereafter pass upon the application. THE MARINA MAY OPEN FOR PUBLIC USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OP THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Marina License application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and the City's designate employees or agents to enter upon the marina c>Mperty at any reasonable time to perform safety and code compiriknce^/ inMectidhsv^ yf / ! / Signed Date V , .'■ix:_Xv.w.\0£- / ItCITY of ORONOPont Office Box 66»CrysUl Bay. Minnesota 55323 Telephone 473-7357 Date ppLlcation sent to Marina _ oat. application returned to City ’’ee Received S _________ . PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND_SUBM1T SIGNED ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FE march 1 OF THE LICENSE YEAR. BUSINESS INFORMATION 1.BUSINESS OR TEIADE NAME Minnetonka Wor’<s div nf r7aP.nia.i:—idnst.r 1 ea.,. - ,, 7Q4 E. Grove LaneStreet Address - - - - -- - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - --- - - - Mailing Address rqx 549 Marina Phone ’ 473-7305 Office Phone 2.PROPERTY INFORMATION Date Property Acquired Marina Controls Property by:X fee ownership lease from .i other (explain) List every occupant, other than this Narina, occupying uhis prop y PAGE 1 OF 5 M •’ cwr.ers: I.w S-\v '■! 0y m'm. ■m • ;• A m < v.‘ ^Oi' • "A: ■■"0 '0:- . -.-i- 6 . WTy-.it.1 3. Names of abutting lakeshcre proper morth/west) windward Marine----]44 ;^ .’Slinrfi. in-2. ------—— (Name + Address) fcinnth/East) Hennepin Count -------^ - - - - (Marne + Address) Other Property Owners that may be affected by Marina's operation: —- - - -- (Name + Address) (Attach sheet if necessary) 4. business ORGANIZATION: (Check applicable item) _ _ _ individual ownership - - - partnership X- - List the name of each partner or corporate officer ana tneir uitle. Arlyn Lomen> Vice President ooration -- —- - - -^-e'-o-sibl‘- for daily operation:List name(s) of the marina manager (s) ^ Dennis Keating/ General Manager Beth Whittaker, Manager of Adninistratjo List the minimum number of employees on duty when the marina is op3n to the public during the boating season. dock attendants reoair or service personnel - - - - - - - - - - others available for sales/public information, e_c. PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY (check services offered): X slip rental (moorage) - - - - , % fuel salesbuoy rental (moorage) - - bait and tack-e sa^es trailer sales X dry storage (moorage) ^ boat launching (day-use ramp) BUSINESS SCHEDULE (check appropriate ire.msi: n „ open during boating season onlyopen all year _jc— i-^ am to 12^ proposed hours of operation; dock access retail sales & service 1 •? ▲ ^ AM to PM PM Pago 2 of 5 0 -ft ’ I>■• . ''VK~ - :‘?* k ^v MARINA SECURITY is provided by: Vein & Associates .ffvV'I;:. r :y m- DOCK INFORMATION NOTE: mF % The LMCD defined DOCK USE AREA must be shou'n on the dock plan submitted with this application. Maximum dock 200 ft. from 929.4 shoreline. Minimum side set^acxs from property line extension are: q-50 ft. from shore = 10 ft. mini.mum setback 50-100 ft. from shore = 15 ft. minimum setback 100-200 ft. from shore “ 20 tt. minimum setback IF 8. SHORELINE WIDTH: 3480 fee t. ■9.WATER DEPTH: at shore - at 100 ft. out X.at 50 ft at*. w • # . out 200 /i f u X. u. • 1- u ' • V. '■ - ■ ■ 10. 11 ACTUAL MAXIMUM DOCK LENGTH rrom shoreline: out 80 ^^^ t-Wb. L. • C *. i. ^Tananger Browns fif if?'?--?'fci'Xi ff.'- DOCK CONSTRUCTION {permanent, seasonal, etc.) float in permanent piling with seasonal necking permanent piling ano oecxing metal or concrete piling metal decking cus tcmei* wooden piling X wooden decking canopies are installed by:marina not allowed ■■ Wr‘.= • 'v ' r SLIPS AND BOAT UNITS List the maximum number of boats in eacn category. boats'or""^' this application. ■A Comf^any Service Boats Rental Boats Rental Slip/Spaca Total Boat • Jf— o'- ii‘12 Boats Stored in the Water km. m ■ wy . ■ :> -4.^ mm a) At dock slips b) At docks, other than slips c) At slides d) At lifts e) At moorings f) Other boats in water I 111 iK 1 '''**>■C:Total Boats in Water U3.lid. Page 3 ci r .j •^4 S.-• r-L' f; BoAtt ’r. 1;. ' pi’ H-' I.. 0'-.^ ‘••V/' i ;." V’'" 13. Boats Dry-Stacked for Lake Uae a) Inside Buildings — b) Outside on Racks — c) Outside - other means — Total Boats Dry-Stacked — 14. Total Watercraft Availability Units (Add 12 & 13) 15. Other Boats on Premises a) Transient Boats (repair/service) b) New boats for sale (inventory) c) Used boats for sale (inventory) T^tal 16. Winter Storage on Premises a) Transient boats (repair/service) b) Contract storage(customer's boats) c) Inventory (new & used boats) Total id Inside Building Outside Storage Inside Building Outside Storage .'y k u - off-street parking requirements 17. Summer Parking a) Retail sales/service customers ^ 8 ‘'.paces minimum (+1 per each 300s. i. over 1,000 s. ^ . ) - b) Boating customers , ^ ^ ^ -6 spaces per 10 Availability Units (.6 X |_l^(line 14)) c) Launching ramp customers 10 spaces minimum per ramp = h'i cars cars cars Vx:s. ;.fcI* Total Spaces ui 1^18. Winter Parking Minimum 2 spaces, or retail spaces per line 16a above cars LANDSCAPING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS 10 ft. side yard and a lakeshore yard of 10% of the lot depth, not than 10 ft. and not more than 75 ft. 1 19. Describe in detail the plantings (trees, shrubs, grass, vines, rlowers, - etc.) and other improvements proposed to be installed this coming 1 (.A .ufj.iL' -1; i' • :/fii ,ry.. k.-’.. ; r-f y. 0-; :^-v' fc.., m-- P'--' ^:i'k 'i ii. rt'* •i‘. ■. ife P-* liV';- 1 V'V ■ ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application: 1. 2. P'v ' ' : |y 3. Kir ‘4 . A CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY (per LMCD requirements) indicating the boundaries of the marina property and the authorized dock use area, the location of all structures, storage areas, docks, slips, buoys, launching rcunps, gas pumps and tanks, parking areas, access areas, fencing and landscaping features. The drawing shall be updated eacn Y^Q.TC to show all existing facilities, all changes from the previous season, and any changes proposed for the duration of the current application. A DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLAN for all setback areas showing existing and proposed location and sizes of all trees, shrubbery, grass areas and other foliage or landscaping features. A copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPLIC.^TION. A COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION FEE according do the current City fee schedule. Initial Application 0 $300.00 Renewal Application @ $200.00 Each Boat Unit (Line 12 ) 0 $2.00 each Each Boat Unit (Line 13 ) 9 $1.00 each TOTAL DUE THIS .^PPLIC.^TION i'V 5. LATE FEES - Renewals - Applications tor renewa^ o- ^.censes sh made no later than February 1st of the new license year. The Cit^ shall not accept renewal license applications received a^tgr 1st unless the application is accompani^c dv a late ree of $50.00". REVIEW PROCEDURE When a complete application is received, this ^111 referred to the Marina Committee for review. The City Council i review the Marina Committee recommendation and will thereafter pass upon the application. THE MARINA MAY OPEN FOR PUBLIC USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE LICEN^ BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, hereby reouests the Orono City Council to review this Manna application, and agrees and .authorizes t.he City of Orono the City s dalignated employees or agents to enter upon the marina property at a y reasonable time to perform safety and code compliance inspectio Signed Date Page 5 of K-'V,m ¥ ” • fe^.. |: f%.' t‘r ■■fcv /-** I'-'K''- r’V’ '?•■•I" ':v' IC' r- *r-:>•: i- r s^;;, iis> RBSOLOTION DIRECTING STAFF TO ISSOE A COMMERCIAL DOCK LICENSE TO SAILOR'S WORLD MARINA SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOTED HEREIN FOR THE PERIOD OP JANUARY 1, 1990 TO DECEMBER 31, 1992 WHEREAS, the City of Orono, hereinafter "City" is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota and has the authority and respons. ‘ Vity under Minnesota Statutes, State Statute 412, et. seq. and State ^>.atute 462, et. seq., to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the City and other members of the public within the City; and WHEREAS, within the City there exist several commercial marinas, hereinafter "marinas" engaged in business activities including but not limited to the following: 1. The sale of new and/or used boats, boating equipment, boat accessories and recreation equipment. 2. The storage, sale, rental, lease, repairing and/or servicing of boats and boat equipment. 3. The sale of gasoline, bait and fishing supplies. 4. The construction and maintenance of docks, boat lifts and buoys on the public waters for purposes of operating the above noted business activities and for rental or lease of such space to a limited number of the general public for storage of individually owned boats. AND WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that if unregulated, such commercial activity on or near the public waters and on the land within the City may be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare and is therefore subject to reasonable regulations by the City; and WHEREAS, it is the overriding concern of the City to eliminate the unique problems presented by increasing boat density, hardcover, traffic density, storm water runoff and noise or other public nuisances in the area of the various marinas; and Page 1 of 5 - tr ;r #.wI i: kiu - V >> I.- r:s t> fe- f- !:■ iVi y i. vU: fr • r ■ i.^-' E I' !'-'■■■,'V:. • r WHBRBAS, because of the geographical location of the marinas and their proximity to heavy population^ and the access to marinas by county and city roads^ and the general use of the bays of Lake M.’.nnetonka for recreation by way of swimming, boating, fishing and water sports by the citizens of Orono, the City regulates both the on-land actiyites of marinas and the extensions of docks and mooring areas into Lake Minnetonka in the interest of public order and to protect the life, safety and welfare of the community. The City through its regulations is not licensing boats but is only licensing the marinas to the extent the marina operations affect the general public and the adjacent properties within the City of Orono; and WHEREAS, the City shares concurrent jurisdiction over the primary harbor limit of the City of Orono with the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and the Department of Natural Resources of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the regulation of the navigable waters involves an exercise of police power of the State, LMCD, and the City of Orono, which have adopted rules to ensure to all equal enjoyment of the public rights and to suppress the clashing of public and private interests and resulting public disorder; and WHEREAS, the regulations of the DNR, LMCD, and the City of Orono regulate the property rights of the riparian owners both as to single family residential owners and the commercial marina owners, to the extent prohibiting any interference with the public waters adjoining that property. The LMCD, DNR and City of Orono must fulfill their t..asteeship over the public waters by protecting against interference by anyone, including those who assert the common law richts of riparian owners, whether or not they be commercial marinas or single fam: ly residential owners; and WHEREAS, as to Lake Minnetonka, a mutual right of enjoyment exists between and is -tared by riparian owners and the public generally. The marinas have no exclusive privileges over Lake Minnetonka. The only additional private right that the marina or any riparian owner may have over the public generally is to construct one dock to the navigable depth of the public waters. There can be no disipute but that the public generally and each riparian owner to Lake Minnetonka has the right to use the entire surface area of Lake Minnetonka for al1 suitable purposes in common with all other riparian owners. This right is a right not only to members of the public but the right to each riparian owner. This mutual right of enjoyment which is shared by riparian owners and the public generally includ«-o the recreational benefits of the Lake such as boating and fishing therein; the riparian marina has no exclusive privileges to these rights; and Page 2 of 5 ».r-1 r,■■I'-..n ■■ i V %■ ■■. k. l.J ' V*.-, Kr W.V !: ^:r''w- ; §>■ :<r ■ • k,, ;■;• .- I- .;iv fe' /V/. ',;;V is • v'»‘ .^-ys. '•r-. /.■ ?: >• ■ r: .'r l-’5 B. V. WHEREAS, as the population has increased around Lake Minnetonka, and in the Twin City Area generally, it is clear that more and more people have used the lake for sailing, rowing, fishing, boating, bathing, skating, and other public purposes which cannot be now fully enumerated or even anticipated; and WHEREAS, Lake Minnetonka is capable of substantial beneficial public use only as long as all riparian users of the Lake are regulated in such a way as to ensure there is no abuse of the limited riparian rights; and WHEREAS, the marina as a commercial riparian owner only has limited riparian rights incident to the ownership of real estate bordering upon Lake Minnetonka. The marina operator has a limited right to build and maintain one suitable landing or dock, on and in front of his land, and to extend the same therefrom into Lake Minnetonka to a point of navigability; but, under no circumstances may he encroach into Lake Minnetonka to a point where he impairs the water's navigability for other public purposes or where he unreasonably interferes with the surface water rights of all riparians and members of the public generally; and WHEREAS, it is fundamental that a riparian ownex’s rights are measured by the necessities and character of his use. The marinas, for private commercial gain wish to temporarily and, in fact, permanently alter the use of the surface water in Lake Minnetonka. Certain sections of the lake, once a source of excellent fishing, have been converted and, in fact, in the future will continue to be converted, into a commercial enterprise all to the detriment of other riparian owners and the public. The marinas present operations and contemplated operations far exceed a reasonable use of their limited riparian rights; and WHEREAS, the most general public use of the water is paramount and should take priority over excessive riparian use for commercial purposes of the lake by the marinas; and WHEREAS, the marinas have separated and disassociated from the normal riparian rights ia many sections of the public waters on Lake Minnetonka by having extended their docks out into Lake Minnetonka beyond the point of navigability and have transferred those rights to others who do not have riparian rights and who are not membf;rs of the general i ublic who obtain access and use of Lake Minnetonka by use of the public access points along Lake Minnetonka. Such commercial transfers of the riparian rights of Lake Minnetonka have resulted in an abuse of reasonable riparian access to Lake Minnetonka. Such abuses must be qualified, restricted and subordinated to the paramount rights of the public to the public waters of Lake Minnetonka; and Page 3 of 5 t?;.. H- I 1^- '>■. lO r;. ■' '-■/ V^' ■>.' i=: 1 WHBRBASr as a condition to the issuance of the 1975 commercial marina licenses, each commercial marina operator agreed with the City in writing to an Operations Agreement outlining a three-year phased improvement proaram established to replace natural vegetation previously removed, to provide for adequate storm water runoff controls, to provide for open space and vegetation buffers between the marina properties and adjoining residential properties, to provide for adequate parking and traffic control and to provide for reasonable performance standards relating to the non-conforming placement and use of docks and mooring spaces upon the public waters? and IfHBRBAS, all of the requirements of the 1975 Operations Agreement are reasonable exercises of the normal police powers of the City of Orono intended to correct the previous abuses and overuses of public waters and the congested commercial marina sites, to correct for the public caused by such abuses and to prevent future abuse of the land or the public waters; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code regulating commercial marina operations. Section the Orono Zoning Code regulating the use of lakeshore business district property and the 1975 Operations Agreement are in full conformity with t e applicable regulations and intents and purpose of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District’s regulations for commercial marinas and the State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources' regulations for protection of public waters; and WHEREAS, the City of Orono did not require commercial dock license applications to be submitted during license years 1986, 1987 and 1989 based on the then pending Code revisions intended to eliminate the licensing requirement. License applications were required in • ^ 1988 commercial dock licenses were issued to those marinas for which no outstanding site or operational issues were identified. License applications were required in 1990 and 1991, but licenses were not issued to any marinas in anticipation of a revised review process; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City of Orono to issue commercial dock licenses for license year 1992 and retroactively issue licenses for license years 1990 and 1991 to all marinas which applied for licenses during those years, regardless of past or present unresolved issues. It is the City's intent that during 1992 the City will work with each marina tc develop a 1993 Operations Agreement outlining a multi year phased improvement program to bring marinas into a higher degree of Page 4 of 5 fe ^ - :4a sgpi ^&pi.%- T?k: conformity with Code requirements than currently exists. Such program may include^ but is not limited to, site and operational modifications in the following areas: number and use of boat slips or storage areas on land; winter boat storage; parking facilities; required yards and landscaping; sanitary facilities; lighting; hours of operation; site upkeep; fuel and hazardous materials storage and dispensation; charter boat operations; on- land boat storage; hardcover; and drainage and stormwater run off controls. .‘'V m WHERBASv the purpose of this Resolution is to set forth the above noted general conditions and concerns and the following special conditions as they relate to an application for an annual Commercial Dock License described on Exhibit A attached, HOWr THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby directs the Staff to issue a Commercial Dock License according to the facts and conditions noted on Exhibit A attached. ■ p«' 1*. Av Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono at their meeting on the 27th day of April, 1992. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST; m; Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk ir 7- i ■ ■ STATE OP MINNESOTA ) )ss. V-COUNTY OP HSNNEPIN ) wr'r/The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of April, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. a i: Z-’: Pg Notary Public Page 5 of 5 CITY OF ORONO EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. r A. CONDITIONS OF ISSUANCE FOR ANNUAL COMMERCIAL DOCK LICENSE I. LICENSEE Sailor*s World, Inc. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (1990: Smith Bay Marina & Yacht Club, Inc.) (1991; Shoreline Marina & Yacht Club, Inc.) Address 1955 Shoreline Drive License Period - January 1, 1990 to December 31, 1992 II. BOAT DENSITY H? Th6 number of in-place boat slips, lifts and buoys shall not exceed the number shown on the attached plan, Exhibit B, and in accordance with Resolution 938, in no case shall the number of authorized boat slips. lifts, or buoys exceed the numb'r permitted in the prior year's license. Authorized Summer Density per attached plan; - Bay Transient Slips Rental Slips Company Slips Sub-Total; Slips at Dock Offshore Buoys Maximum Boats in Water Smith's Dry stacked slip for use in lake Maximum Boats in water per prior license Other Boats (for sale/service, etc.) MAXIMUM BOAT DENSITY ON LAND AND/OR IN WATER 0 77 Exceeding this maximum boat density, or exceeding the number of permitted slips, lifts or buoys is a violation of this license subject to revocation and/or prosecution for violation of Section 5.42 Subdivision 2 of the Orono Municipal Code. Authorized Number of Winter Stored Boats 61 (per prior license, but limited to requirements of Section 5.42, Subd 4) a'"'- 1 I4. fe. ■t ■W : mi- •■ < w'- m ■ t:-. Exhibit A Resolution No. Page 2 III. DOCK LAYOUT (reference Exhibit B attached) Maximum authorized length of main dock 200 fi* ■ • ■W- IV. V. m.m •H>^ •. feet. Docks extending beyond 200 feet and docks encroaching into required side yard setbacks are hereby specifically declared to be illegal non- conforming structures which are nor permitted under this license. The application does not contain such illegal structures. All such violations are subject to prosecution under Sections 5.42 and 10.41 of the Orono Municipal Code. Marina is authorized for FUEL SALES subject to compliance with the State Fire Code. Required number of OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES 48 (see below) SPECIAL CONDITIONS required for compliance with the ordinances of the City and/or the LMCD. The issuance of this license is subject to full compliance with these conditions. Failure to comply with these conditions is cause for license revocation and/or prosecution by the City. 1) Council grants a parking variance of 6 stalls, allowing operation with only 42 stalls per the findings and conditions of Resolution No. 2194. 2) All parking spaces identified on Exhibit B shall remain open during all hours of operation. The licensee shall be responsible keeping patrons from parking on the public right-of-way of Shoreline Drive. 3) Council will continue to approve for the 1992 license year the temporary use of a portable toilet facility to serve all needs for the marina during the summer months until the marina building is constructed. 4) The City Council will continue to allow operation under the Orders and Conditions of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District dated April 27, 1988, attached hereto as Exhibit D. 5) Subject to variances conditionally approved for parking setbacks, structural setbacks, and hardcover in Resolution No. 2648 of the City Council. VII Nothing in this license shall confer upon any person for the benefit of any property any vested right to use Lake Minnetonka or the premises in a manner permitted by this resolution, but the use of Lake Minnetonka and the premises shall remain subject to such regulations and ordinances as the City and other competent regulatory authorities shall deem necessary from time to time in the public interest. Issuance of this license is not intended as a confirmation of licensee’s conformity with all ordinances regulating the site conditions and operation of the commercial use. ^ .te •ff. IV * 'i ^esd tXA.Tt»AJo< X>oc.y^ bcio<^-r -1^ • • f^P(Ub\}^ poi^ /* } /♦ / r, ^4^ ^ ix,:.'' *» \i /•/r\ V^v j'rk'- 'f >.v-^ i,. I .M :■ ■«■ '*sr- ^(STT^IC.7^ /VVOO /VfS'C’A- i ■f ; T' • ... i.?; li?;: : - exi^ie^tr c. a)o --r I i niimimir ... Wiiiit :il^^ ;«SilS:;:'ilmmmmM'' JO — I I I \l i ,Ji _i_.AU-.- I ‘-r I !9 /3 .1' —i/' i < \2i I i \ ^ftieyi/Md- /.AYot^T" V/WANC^ AiO, i :lv. mit-v*- P^'fe':. t,'-^>i»'Y tv, !k' I?i. 'Hi- siVr V'- iS.r . BW-y P ir V ;>--'k'’V'“’W' tt ,, ' y V- •• pir- Vv . - -P. •!: ■ i’t' , :p:# i" / 1^ ■ £.;;v s'- p:- '• S;-VLr,- -S'* ■p :'■ K >?'0*'- cytftSf / ^'fi^,ucnc .V- A -' lake MirWETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT RE: APPLICATION OF SMITH'S BAY MARINA FINDINGS The matter of the application for variances for Smith’s Bay Marina and Yacht Club was the subject of a public hearing on December 10, 1986. at 7:00 p.o. at the Tonka Bay Village Hall. John Vogt appeared on behalf of the Applicant, which at that time was Sailor's World. Applicant owns and operates a commercial marina at Its property in LMCD area 26 on Smith's Bay. The Applicant was seeking approval of a setback variance on the east side of the property to provide 12 slips and a lot-line adjustment and setback variance on the west side to provide 8 slips, all to replace 20 mooring spaces. Hr. Vogt presented letters of agreement from the abutting owners, the City of Otono on the west and Alan Nettles on the east. The grounds stated for the request are converging lot lines and discontinuance of a distr-'ct mooring area. ' The Board finds that It Is In the best interest of the public and of the protection and preservation of the Lake that the 20 .pace district mooring area of Sailor's World be discontinued. The discontinuance of the district mooring area will Impose some hardship on the Applicant as Is more fully described In the attached memorandum which Is made a part of this Order. Board further finds that the converging lot lines of the applicant s authorlaed dock use area constitutes a hardship within the meaning of LMCD Code Section 3.04. ORDER On the basis of the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED: That variances, some of which are temporary, for construction in the setback, area and beyond 100 feet from the shoreline of a dock as shown -T'' ■■•/P! *VI • ,A-;,^. .:.i !.v. PtkrV' Sf w ll.*'»- !{.;• , ■ py mp-m it.. pu'tet'- ' .‘ 4 *h-Kf. ■f-- C,^7fv* iV. . i mr-. . m- ■ ■ ct^-^ ■ ■fe. IP' attached Exhibit A, which is hereby made a part hereof, are granted subject to the following conditions and limitations: 1.The 20 district mooring area is to be discontinued prior to the 1988 boating season. 2.A setback variance is granted on the north side of the dock use area for construction of ten slips, all of which fall in whole or in part within the 100-foot contour. This variance applies to slip numbers 1, 2, » 5, 6, 7. 8, 9 and Ic on Exhibit A. The dock construction shall not extend beyond the north extended lot line of Applicant's property. 3.A setback variance on the south of the dock use area is granted for construction of four slips (numbered 66 through 69 on Exhibit A) each of which falls all or partly within the 100-foot contour. Said slips within the setback area on the south side of the Applicant's property are to be seasonally removed from the Lake and shall not extend beyond the south extended lot line of Applicant's property. 4.A temporary setback variance is granted within the 100- to 200-foot r.! :r:nis: to be removed after the 1997 boating season. 5.conVor u:. orfcu^^ups (nll^bared 51, 52, 53 and 54 on Exhibit A), all of which are to be removed after the 1997 boating season. 6. 7. A total of 79 slips are authorized at the Applicant's facility for 1988 Applicant shall provide the District with an as-built survey within 90 days of completion of reconstruction of the docks. The variances Issued hereby shall grant no vested rights to the use of Lake Minnetonka. Such use shall at all times remain subject to regulation by the District to ensure the public of reasonable and equitable access Lake. By Order of the Board of Directors of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District this 27th day of April , kftax. 1988. rector n / /jjv,cc> ^ 'r^r / / / S-1 7f iHi H9 £. 0^ V'i' IP^-' fe. IP'' @ j@ I @ :@ ®0CuvW.;(63) nnrH @i® (fo)! (ti cW p> f;'p-ic • i;- 2‘ fe.' IP i^< %-^v • RECtlVt' • NOV 131989 L.M.C-D. I fS9- 7' CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Phone 473“7357 T.rcenseprYeaXr -/V ‘ issoWS'^•“nN Uli Date application sent to Marina 3 *> Date application returned to City AMiroaa. commercial marima license ,~ ^s^nt to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.12 APR 1 0 1992 Section 5.42, Subdivision 2 - liTThe "business of for any person to engage pg/atiug) a commercial docking, mooring, or boats or (operatx^ license boat dock business" without first having oocain therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL I''™:”® T^TH^CITY CLERK^'b?ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO ant- JANUARY 15 OF THE LICENSE YEAR. BUSINESS INFORMATION 1. BUSINESS OR TRADE NAME Street Address i<i5S~ —----- Mailing Address '~6aic ao Marina Phone H 7 I V * ✓'* r r. \<Vccio A^,4,iri^ ivViiar Cl^-^ jr\r^ .1^1 I -- 7, Office Phone {H H 2.PROPERTY INFORMATION Date Property Acquired Marina Controls Property by: ownership lease from other (explain) List every occupant, other than this Marina, occupying this property: Page 1 of 5 .V -.t !#■ il^' 4. •: • ^ 5 6. Names of abutting lakeshora property o'^'ners: wam=» r rrsat^ ^ bMcc-r/^'. O/- ‘ ^ ^ jNorbh/Wes J--------(Name AddressTB a/^ s7=hnB^^uiS ,c»„^h/East) ALA,vJ k)Pm^S ———---- (Name + Address) . ___. Ho affected by Marina's ooeration:Other Property Owners that may be aftecwea ny (Name + AddressT (Attach sheet if necessary) business ORGANIZATION: (Check applicable iteffl) I.- nai-^ne'-srio corporationindividual ownership —. par^n - - . ^ Officer aund their title:List th« name of each partner or corpo-a.- o—lo », —j——i————LtaHpn rnsL^insL jls op0H to List the minimum number of employees oi ■- ti.e ptiblic during’ the boating season: 9 ___ dock attendants - ■ others available for sales/public information, etc. m reoair or sezrvice personnel principal business activity (check services offered) : -r-ooair parts and service slip rental (moorage) —^ ------- buoy rental (moorage) ^ -Z7 dry storage (moorage) _____ boat launching (day-use ramp) ------- trailer sa es BUSINESS SCHEDULE (check appropriate items) : open- .11 year __ =P- List proposed hours of operation: dock access _£_ . f^:^^ice"“ AM to ^ PW PM Page 2 of 5 U.: ,■ MAHINA SECURITiT is provided by: jr' % •T* POCK INFORMATION • . i. rte?- Ropn mTis'*' be shown on the dock plan NOTE: The '^®fi!J®?i^s'^oDlication. Maximum dock length equals shiiei^S^ Minimum side setbacks from property line extension are: (,.50 ft. from shore - 10 ft. minimum se^ck 50-100 ft. from shore = 15 j-t. setback ...... • ioC-200 ft. from shore “ 20 ft. minimum se ac 8. SHORELINE WIDTH: . feet. 9, WATER DEPTH: at shore *7 ft.; at 50 ft. cut at 100 ft. out / ft.; at 200 ft. out &10. ACTOAL MAXIMUM DOCK LENGTH from shoreline: /•2-Z^ (ji’ 0' dock construction (permanent, seasonal, etc.) _ permanent piling with seasonal decking permanent'piling and decking wooden piling ______ metal or concrete orlrng wooden decking ______ decking canopies are installed by: _J£. ma--n-«*?_^ ailowed .< “.-s "iss'o, sas-.;*'" this application. 12 . Boats Stored in the Water a) At dock slips b) At docks, other than slips c) At slides •••’ d) At lifts •. * e) At moorings . f) other boats in water . Total Boats in Water , Co««pAPr S«rvicj BoAtJ Rental Boats Bentel Sllp/Sp«ee Tctel Boecs aj 7l I± page 3 of 5 >> stv-fA^.r :£M}^’:w '1^'-tevm.. rirg'--^ I .-•’\f ^V--Tn;^s ► i.Vr- V-. ■ :Ji^- r'r .-: ■■ ^;."*'■ ' * A ^• - ll P-"r^t»' %!:■: 1""^ ■ ■rw 'Jf -' ' .m. m?fA fl- E'O fei'p-fev-fe.ifc' ?« . ., . S.rvtc. o-t.l »o.t. *.nt.l t.lP/SP«« •»“» 13. Boats Dry-Stacked for Lake Use ° ^ a) Inside Buildings -- - ~~ b) Outside on Racks -- - "_ _ c) Outside - other means - -- • Total*Boats Dry-Stacked - -- -- - 77 r? 14. Total Watercraft Availability Unxts (Add 12 6 13) Tl Other Boats on Premises a) Transient Boats (repair/service) b) New boats for sale (inventory/ c) Used boats for sale (inventory) Tnside Building Outside Storage Total 16. Winter Storage on Premises a) Transient boats (repair/service^ b) Contract storage(customer's boats c) Inventory (new 6 used boats) Total Inside Building Outside Storage off - STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS 17. Summer Parking a) Retail sales/service customers i nnn 5 ^ ) =8 spaces minimum (+1 per each SOus.f. ove. 1,000 s.^.) b) Boating customers v/atEyM'-o i4n »6 spaces pei 10 Availability Units (.6 X^—..e 14 jj c) Launching ramp customers I'O spaces- minimum per ramp - cars V' cars Total Spaces 18. Winter Parking Minimum 2 spaces, or retail spaces per _ine 16a above /V cars landscaping and SITE IliPROVEMENTS Ordin«.ces require ^tabUstoePand maintenance y"raiSMa"Is^e yard of 10» of the lot depth, not less than 10 ft. and not more than 75 ft. 19. Describe in detail the j^J^alled^^is'coming ^license etc.) and other improvenenta propo=ed_to ___ year: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pace 4 of 5 fe:#-- . t fc". !'-:;r<- k:. f ff* r- ■ C:V‘- k:i i i: : j-N? ^:f- *• 0: . ■■' I'Y r'. «•■ iifiS ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application: 1.a rFR'TTPTCATE OF SUHVEY (Per LMCD requirements) indicating ?a”ks • partin/a-aV, ^“=/eVs In^clnr-f la"n“ds?fping season, and any changes propo^sed for the duration o current application. ap /— x c. 2.A DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLAN for a 11 setback areas showing existing and proposed location and sites °f all trees, shrubbery, grass areas and other foliage or Ian scaping features. 3. 4. A copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPLICATION. A COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE AirLICATION FEE according to the current City fee schedule. Initial Application @ $300.00 Renewal Application @ $200.00 Each Boat Unit (Line 12) @ $2.00/ea Each Boat Unit (Line 13) @ $1.00/ea TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION $!T S 5.LATE FEES - Renewals - Applications rTew Vi^cense shall be made no later than January 15 ^Yc^se vear The City shall not accept renewal licep ge apolicati^ns receiy^ after January 15 unless application is accompanied bij a late f^ of SSO.OO^ compfe?^application ^ Th™Ci\y ” Council thereafter pass upon the application. THE MARINA MAY OPEN FOR POBLIC USE ONLY UPON ^PROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. pursuant to Section 5.42 of the _5°f®' ^hil applicant hereby requests the Orono the City of Marina License application, and agrees and auth «n-ter uoon Orono and the City's designated employees or agents to P * the marina property at any reasonable time to perform sa y code compliance inspectior“=^ Signed ■f Date f ^ 7 ^ ' • ■■ >*r fe-'V k :■ \'U’ . I rS ; ifI 'k.'f\% ■ ■ V m: iilX-.'f^m, >t ■ isif W‘... •f, m- h| ¥hR, i,;. I • i Hivi; %'r*>-‘^-’-- ir-:. 'ill CITY OP ORONO License Year P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Phone 473-7357 / f / Date application sent to Marina Dat:8 application returned to City 7 - v / ANNUAL COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.42 Section 5.42, Subdivision 2 - Licensed Require_d^ It is unlawful d:c.?n“^, I^^^^m^rclal boat dock business- without first having obtained a license^ therefor from the City.u .1 PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED AFFLICTION, ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE AFFLICATION FEE TO THE CITY ^LE^ APRIL 1 OF THE LICENSE YEAR. ““ " *_ k» fc. — ' ! t - - -V-I- .» • ^'-1. . •• . -J’ t u* n 11 \ra .. w 1. *I - • f • ^ tlTJ ■ - •<•. • T! 1.. — •. V ..Vi l%V i. I i - v4.. N.* ^BUSTNES3 INFORMATION 1, BUSINESS OR TRADE NAME ^ Vf^cHTj—O-X~a /Q Street Address /92>'Zb —D.-dZ ------UJ^ ZW ^23 Mailing Address /9s L■' Qa A -------(a JA'^l^d ------- Marina Fhone H "fb ' 3*-/H J Office Phone /? nn 2.PROPERTY INFORMATION Date Property Acquired V^c. / ■? Marina Controls Property by:fee ownership lease from X other (explain) (Z D List every occupant, other than this Marina, occupying this property: Page 1 of 5 fit ' f>^.- -.-.V i!'.. '■ *•.' ■ ; i- ^ . r t- 3. • -'. ^Ir ' - Names of abutting lakeshore property owners: Lau.Oc HfNorth/West) C, j^A(±\ —------------- ^ (Name + Address) £irCiS(South/East) tM\£!sl— N^lZk ------------------- (Name + Address) hP affected by Marina’s operation Other property Owners that may be ar.ecre y f\JnfJ€ —■ (Name + Address) (Attach sheet if necessary) 4. business organization: (Check applicable ite., individual ownership — par.n . . _Zi__ List the nan.e of each partner or corporate officer and their title: 'T hJA’fd:A/££-------- - --- - - - - - - - - - - - --- -'=.„;.„»r(sl resDonsible for daily operation:List name(s) of the marrna manager(s) r-s. T?A<J.iQ T ■ Zlst the minimum number of employees on d“nty when the marina rs open to the public during the boating season: ■ ' j +-e repair or service personnel1-2, dock attendants ------- repaid1-7 ctOCK --------- 777 others available for sales/public information e c. PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ACTIVXTV (check ^ ,,,,,,, V slip rental (moorage) - -- —&— , y fuel salesbuoy rental ^moorage) —ci—- -- ^ . bait and tackle sales diry storage (moorage) -- - boat launching (day-use ramp) - - t-ailer 6 .BUSINESS SCHEDULE (check appropriate items). open during boating season only V open all year - -- - List proposed hours of operation: dock access - - - — retail sales & service _ _ _ PM AM to PM Page 2 of 5 ■ -1;' *\. ' ■ .■'♦■ . -. i;K- „'Ut ... '*«vrv. \& >? f.■:■ » 4 • • 7. MARINA SECURITY is provided by: /T1 (j ,'T\ 1 DOCK INFORMATION NOTE:The LMCD defined DOCK USE AREA must be shown on the dock plan submitted with this application. Maximum dock length equals 200 ft. from 929.4 shoreline. Minimum side setbacks from property line extension are: q-50 ft. from shore = 10 ft. minimum setback 50-100 ft. from shore = 15 ft. minimum setback from shore = 20 ft. minimum setback 8. 100-200 ft. SHORELINE WIDTH: ^ U'O feet. 9. WATER DEPTH: at shore J-J) at 100 ft. out ft. ; 1L_ at 50 ft. out iC 10. 11 ft.; at 200 ft. out ACTUAL MAXIMUM DOCK LENGTH from shoreline: - - I b ft. DOCK CONSTRUCTION (permanent, seasonal, etc.) - - - - permanent piling with seasonal deckinc permanent piling and decking wooden piling _ _ _ metal or concrete piling wooden decking _ _ _ metal decking m.arina _ _ 'X canopies are installed by:custom.sr X allowed SLIPS AND BOAT UNITS List the maximum number of boats in each category. Each slip, slide, lift, miorina or other space actually used for storage or keeping ot boats or watercraft must be indicated and numbered on the dock plan submit^e wi n this application. Cor«p«ny Service Boats Rental Boats Rental SUp/Space Total Boa 12 . Boats a) At b) At c) At r'iviv-i d) At e) At Boats Stored in the Water 71 other boats Total Boats in water in Water Page 3 of 5 v; ' « <Ti. !,«/) fnr r ^lcc» Us® C3-«..nv S«tv,c* s.ntii Bolt. Bent.i Slip/3^>.c. Tot.ldo.t.11 floats Dry-Stacked for LaJc^ us_ a) Inside Buildings ------ ------- ------ ------- b) Outside on Racks ------- ------- ------- c) Outside - other means ------- ------- -----— —— Total Boats Dry-StacJced ____ ____ ____ ____ 14, Total Watercraft Availability Units (Add 12 & 13) 77 S. ■y‘. ■ * i •• ^ •t: > . ■i 15. Other Boats on Premises a) Transient Boats (repair/service) b) New boats for sale (inventory) c) Used boats for sale (inventory) Total 16. Winter Storage on Premises a) Transient boats (repair/service) b) Contract storage (customer' s boats) c) Inventory (new & used boats) Total Inside Building Outside Storage Inside Building Outside Storage OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS .-■i 17. Summer Parking a) Retail sales/service customers 8 spaces minimum (+1 per each 800s.f. over 1,000 s.f.) - b) Boating customers 6 spaces per 10 Availability units (.6 X c) Launching ramp customers 10 spaces minimum per ramp = cars (iine 14)) =cars cars I.'-Total Soaces HZ ,i8- Winter Parking Minimum 2 spaces, or retail spaces per line 16a above -ff-'- k;- cars lANDSCAPING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS ■ ' t Ordinances rec|uire establishment and maintenance of minimum green areas and natural screening along an Marina property lines: 10 ft. front yard, 10 ft. side yard and a lakeshore yard of 10% of the lot depth, not less than 10 ft. and not more than 75 ft. I , >• • 19. Describe in detail the plantings (trees, shrubs, grass, vines, flowers etc.) and other improvements proposed to be installed this coming license year; _ _ _—_ _ _—- - - - - - - - - - - --—-- - - - - p. 1^-Paco 4 of 5 > /.' I \ I " ■ IM- ■ • ■ * 4 fc-''t i;:-5| :C=- »F/. ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application: 1.A CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY (Per LMCD requirements) indicating th» boundaries of the marina property and the authorized dock use area, the location of all structures, storage features. The drawing shall be updated each year to show all existing facilities, all changes from the Previous season, and any changes proposed for the duration of the current application. 2.A DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLAN for all setback areas showing ^°n=ro\°he/"/o A^age irnLc^p^g features. 3. 4. A copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPLICATION. A COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION FEE according to the current City fee schedule. Initial Application (? $300.00 Renewal Application § $200.00 Each Boat Unit (Line 12) § $2.00/ea Each Boat Unit (Line 13) 9 $1.00/ea ;1?0 CO TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION OO LATE FEES - Renewals - AppJ ications for renewal of licenses shall be made no later than April 1st of the new license year. The City shall not accept rental license LolicatfSiTi recirvegTftir April 1st unle^ ^ applicati^ is accompanied by a late fee o£ $50.00_.. REVIEW PROCEDURE . ^ -i When a comp let—application is received, thrs - _ e _ a-s-* __ _r*a-.T«ins 4-4'oe* for review. The City councilwnen a complete - --- -- —O,-f.,, ronnrilreferred to the Marina Committee for review. The City Council will review the Marina Committee recommendation and will thereafter pass upon the application. THE MARINA MAY OPEN FOR PUBLIC USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL Pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono ^ ^itv of Marina License application, and agrees and Orono and the City’s designated employees sa^ty and the marina property at any reasonable time to perform safety code pempli^aoce inspections. Sign Date f- 9 / ^K»j9iir;i dtra w> r'-r i' 7. marina security is provided by: t PRIVATE PARTY_ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ __ -r ■ s dock information NOTE: ■ i ■ ^ *- * J" ri..i The LMCD defined DOCK USE AREA must be sho^ on the dock plan submitted with this apoiication. Maximum ^ocx xangth equals 20rft from 929.4 shoreline. Minimum side setbacxs from property line extension are: q_^q from shore = 10 ft. r inimum setback 50-100 ft. from shore - 15 ft. minimum setback 100-200 ft. from, shore = 20 ft. minimum setback of: ’8. SHORELINE WIDTH: 260 feet. 9.w 3-5WATER DEPTH: at shore _ _ _ C 4-; at 50 ft. cut 1 n z JL <J I at 100 ft. out Cl .. J •out 15 p*.X w . 10.actual maximum DOCK LENGTH from shoreline:200 ’;-r DOCK CONSTRUCTION (permanent, seasonal, etc.) permanent piling with seasonax decking b ’-| • X permanent piling and decxing wooden piling _ _ _ ^etal or concrete piling X wooden deckin<^ __ __ metal dec.<mg marinacanopies are installed by:custom.er X not allowed SLIPS AND BOAT UNITSbtiXra rtxiu 1 i Pf . List the maximum number of boats in each cf^egory^ ^^e^ng'of boatror ' ' h S!ter2la1t musrbI"?ndicatef-d'^n™be?L on the doc. plan submitted vith ■' this application. Comp.if>y Service Boats Rental Boats Rental Slip/Space Total Boat 12 . Boats Stored in the Wate»" a) At dock slips b) At docks, other than slips c) At slides d) At lifts e) At moorings f) Other boats in water Total Boats in Water ISI I-a :I’ of V ‘ IIfe.f, p'‘‘ p.e s 14 . -Boats Dry-Stacked for Lake us^a) Inside Buildings b) Outside on Racks c) Outside - other means Total Boats Dry-5tac!:ed Total Watercraft Availability Units (Add 12 & 13) Boati 79 Ss;15. umr. m-m- vA 1 16. / 'c • other Boats on Premises a) Transient Boats (repair/service) b) New boats for sale (inventory) c) Used boats for sale (inventory) Total Winter Storage on Premises a) Transient boats (repair/service) b) Contract storage(customer's boats, c) Inventory (new & used boats) Total Inside Buildinc Outside Storage Inside Building Outside Storage N / A 'I-. >opp -street parking requirements ;V ./ - ■■ ‘ 17. Summer Parking a) Retail sales/service customers b) Boating customers c) Launching ramp cuscom-rs 10 spaces minimum per ramp = a. ■18. Winter Parking Minimum 2 spaces, or retail aces oer f. over 1,000 s.-.) —cars (.6 .X (line 14)) =42 cars cars Total Spaces 42 • line 16a above =cars v.«i • ■ ■ > V : • ;<• “if; ^ LANDSCAPING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS ordinances require establishment ind maintenance of and natural screening along all :■ arina Property Irnes: 10 ft. 10 ft. side yard and a lakeshore yard o: 10% of the lot aeptn, than 10 ft. and not more than 75 ft.I IQ Describe in detail the plantings (trees, shrubs, grass, vines, powers, etc.) and other improvements proposed to be installed this coming year: m y: \'.; ■: I ■’•s ' ‘f. .. S--. ■ ■ -i,* ■ >■ ATTACHMENTSThe! "following must accompany this applica*:ion : 1.A CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY (per LMCD requirements) indicating the boundaries of the marina property and the authorized dock use area, the location of all structures, storage areas, cocks, slips, buoys, launching ramps, gas pumps and tanks, parking areas, access areas, fencing and landscaping features. The drawing shall be updated each year to show all existing facilities, all changes from the previous season, and any changes proposed for the duration of the current application. 2. A DETAILED LANDSC.APE PLAN for all setback areas showing existing and proDOsed location and sizes of all trees, shruboery, grass areas and'other foliage or landscaping features. 3. 4. A copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPLICATION. FEE acA COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION City fee schedule. rdina to the current W Initial Application @ $300.00 Renewal Application @ $200.00 Each Boar Unit (Line 12 ) § $2.00 each Each Boat Unit (Line 13 ) f Sl-00 each $200.00 $153.00 TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION 3 358.00 •S. LATE FEES - Renewals - Applications foi renewal oz licenses shall be ft:,,' maL no later than February 1st of the new license year.^^The Citv REVIEW PROCEDURE 'Mi A:;, When a complete application is received, this j;Cf°c?i:'cSunci^ will r:v!erthe°Mar!nfloi;;^it:"'^ ^illVLreafteJ pass upon the application. THE MARINA MAY OPEN FOR PUBLIC USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. h;...pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono .Mraicipal Code, ,.^1. ■'\ «r'^—bvt. Date / a - n 0^! 4A Page 5 of 5 F I V;’i. • ^C; i ,T>'.:, * A V. ■’•■ ffr v;. -V, I-' ti'l'm •fiV.J ■ . A ■'.'. I Iv>1*^ ‘ .;■ •!. ■ ^-■‘: r‘ V’VItf - %: 5TV ii£vIr I?' RBSOLOTION DIRECTING STAFF TO ISSUE A COMMERCIAL DOCK LICENSE TO CRYSTAL BAY SERVICE SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOTED HEREIN FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 1991 TO DECEMBER 31, 1992 WHEREAS, the City of Orono, hereinafter "City" is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota and has the authority and responsibility under Minnesota Statutes, State Statute 412, et. seq. and State Statute 462, et. seq., to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the City and other members of the public within the City; and WHEREAS, within the City there exist several commercial marinas, hereinafter "marinas" engaged in business activities including but not limited to the following; 1. The sale of new and/or used boats, boating equipment, boat accessories and recreation equipment. 2. The storage, sale, rental, lease, repairing and/or servicing of boats and boat equipment. 3. The sale of gasoline, bait and fishing supplies. 4, The construction and maintenance of docks, boat lifts and buoys on the public waters fo^ purposes of operating the above noted bus* .less activities and for rental or lease of such space to a limited number of the general public for storage of individually owned boats. AND WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that if unregulated, such commercial activity on or near the public waters and on the land within the City may be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare and is therefore subject to reasonable regulations by the City; and WHEREAS, it is the overriding concern of the City to eliminate the unique problems presented by increasing boat density, hardcover, traffic density, storm water runoff and noise or other public nuisances in the area of the various marinas; and Page 1 of 5 i ‘X ’''- * Vi :■' , ’-V i. ■ m ;’ t.^ r» - i ' ,? '^■ IfHBREASr because of the geographical location of the marinas and their proximity to heavy population, and the access to marinas by county and city roadSf and the general use of the bays of Lake Minnetonka for recreation by way of swimming, boating, fishing and water sports by the citizens of Orono, the City regulates both the on-land activites of marinas and the extensions of docks and mooring areas into Lake Minnetonka in the interest of public order and to protect the life, safety and welfare of the community. The City tnrough its regulations is not licensing boats but is only licensing the marinas to the extent the marina operations affect the general public and the adjacent properties within the City of Orono; and WHEREAS, the City shares concurrent jurisdiction over the primary harbor limit of the City of Orono with the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and the Department of Natural Resources of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the regulation of the navigable waters involves an exercise of police powe’ of the State, LMCD, and the City of Orono, all of which have adopted ru s to ensure to a 11 equal enjoyment of the public rights and to suppress the clashing of public and private interests and resulting public disorder; and WHEREAS, the regulations of the DNR, LMCD, and the City of Orono regulate the property rights of the riparian owners both as to single feunily residential owners and the commercial marina owners, to the extent prohibiting any interference with the public waters adjoining that property. The LMCD, DNR and City of Orono must fulfill their trusteeship over the public waters by protecting against interference by anyone, including those who assert the commonlaw rights of riparian owners, whether or not they be commercial marinas or single family residential owners; and WHEREAS, as to Lake Minnetonka, a mutual right of enjoyment exists between and is shared by riparian owners and the public generally. The marinas have no exclusive privileges over Lake Minnetonka. The only additional private right that the marina or any riparian owner may have over the public generally is to construct one dock to the navigable depth of the public waters. There can be no dispute but that the public generally and each riparian owner to Lake Minnetonka has the right to use the entire su^-face area of Lake Minnetonka for all suitable purposes in common with all other riparian owners. This right is a right not only to members of the public but the right to each riparian owner. This mutual right of enjoyment which is shared by riparian owners and the public generally includes the recreational benefits of the Lake such as boating and fishing therein; the riparian marina has no exclusive privileges to these rights; and Page 2 of 5 . ■ ’V • . T-v;" ••'•;. k> • '•'. ^?V* iX'k % 5'V ;■, I f. ■n •■.■r [•'' l.'v ix-B r m. WHEREAS, as the population has increased around Lake Minnetonka, and in the Twin City Area generally, it is clear that more and more people have used the lake for sailing, rowing, fishing, boating, octhing, skating, and other public purposes which cannot oe now fully enumerated or even anticipated; and WHEREAS, Lake Minnetonka is capable of substantial beneficial public use only as long as all riparian users of the Lake are regulated in such a way as to ensure there is no abuse of the limited riparian rights; and WHEREAS, the marina as a commercial riparian owner only has limited riparian rights incident to the ownership of real estate bordering upon Lake Minnetonka. Tne marina operator has a limited right to build and maintain one suitable landing or dock, on and in front of his land, and to extend the same therefrom into Lake Minnetonka to a point of navigability; but, under no circumstances may he encroach into Lake Minnetonka to a point where he impairs the water's navigability for other public purposes or where he unreasonably interferes with the surface water rights of all riparians and members of the public generally; and WHEREAS, it is fundamental that a riparian owner's rights are measured by the necessities and character of his use. The marinas, for private commercial gain wish to temporarily and, in fact, permanently alter the use of the surface water in Lake Minnetonka. Certain sections of the I'ke, once a source of excellent fishing, have been converted and, in fact, in the future will continue to be converted, into a commercial enterprise all to the detriment of other riparian owners and the public. The marinas present operations and contemplated operations far exceed a reasonable use of their limited riparian rights; and WHEREAS, the most general public use of the water is paramount and should take priority over excessive riparian use for commercial purposes of the lake by the marinas; and WHEREAS, the marinas have separated and disassociated from the normal riparian rights in many sections of the public waters on Lake Minnetonka by having extended their docks out into Lake Minnetonka beyond the point of navigability and have transferred those rights to others who do not have riparian rights and who are not members of the general public who obtain access and use of Lake Minnetonka by use of che public access points along Lake Minnetonka. Such commercial transfers of the riparian rights of Lake Minnetonka have resulted in an abuse of reasonable riparian access to Lake Minnetonka. Such abuses must be qualified, restricted and subordinated to the paramount rights of the public to the public waters of Lake Minnetonka; and Page 3 of 5 f I- .; • m I:'■ r I' ;■> vVI*'''. ■ * rl-: I / to- j . r-v' %. Vr- ^ IffHBRSAS, as a condition to the issuance of the 1975 commercial marina licenses^ each commercial marina operator agreed with the City in writing to an Operations Agreement outlining a three-year phased improvement program established to replace natural vegetation previously removed# to provide for adequate storm water runoff controls# to provide for open space and vegetation buffers between the marina properties and adjoining residential properties# to provide for adequate parking and traffic control and to provide for reasonable performance standards relating to the non-conforming placement and use of docks and mooring spaces upon the public waters; and WHEREAS# all of the requirements of the 1975 Operations Agreement are reasonable exercises of the normal police powers of the City of Orono intended to correct the previous abuses and overuses of public waters and the congested com;vercial marina sites# to correct for the public harm caused by such abuses and to prevent future abuse of the land or the public waters; and WHEREAS# all of the requirements of Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code regulating commercial marina operations# Section 10.41 of the Orono Zoning Code regulating the use of lakeshore business district property and the 1975 Operations Agreement are in full conformity with the applicable regulations and intents and purpose of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District's regulations for commercial marinas and the State of Minnesota# Department of Natural Resources' regulations for protection of public waters; and WHEREAS# the City of Orono did not require commercial dock license applications to be submitted during license years 1986# 1987 and 1989 based on the then pending Code revisions intended to eliminate the licensing requirement. License applications were required in 1988# and 1988 commercial dock licenses were issued to those marinas for which no outstanding site or operational issues were identified. License applications were required in 1990 and 1991# but licenses were not issued to any marinas in anticipation of a revised review process; and WHEREAS# it is the intent of the City of Orono to issue commercial dock licenses for license year 1992 and retroactively issue licenses for license years 1990 and 1991 tc all marinas which applied for licenses during those years# regardless of past or present unresolved issues. It is the City's intent that during 1992 the City will work with each marina to develop a 1993 Operations Agreement outlining a multi-year phased improvement program to bring marinas into a higher degree of Page 4 of 5 p|; p.-mi. fcv,„ .mm >^,.‘Vvr i- m- V-f 'i-:-r.‘ ■ ■V- , ■■ m-S- ■•A'f; . • ^ S;?« ife'M P m,. confonnity with Code requirements than currently exists. Such program may includCf but is not limited to# site and operational modifications in the following areas: number and use of boat slips or storage areas on land; winter boat storage; parking facilities; required yards and landscaping; sanitary facilities; lighting; hours of operation; site upkeep; fuel and hazardous materials storage and dispensation; charter boat operations; on~ land boat storage; hardcover; and drainage and stormwater run off controls. WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to set forth the above noted general conditions and concerns nd the following special conditions as they relate to an application for an annual Commercial Dock License described on Exhibit A attached. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby directs the Staff to issue a Commercial Dock License according to the facts and conditions noted on Exhibit A attached. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono at their meeting on the 27th day of April. 1992. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of April, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 5 of 5 k CITY OP ORONO i- t Si- EXHIBIT A RESOLOTION NO. CONDITIONS OF ISSUANCE FOR ANNUAL COMMERCIAL DOCK LICENSE I. LICENSEE Crystal Bay Service_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ r,--MwI Address 3398 North Shore Drive^ Wayzata MN 55391 k License Period ^ January 1991 to December 31, 1992 II. BOAT DENSITY i ■ I mfe te.'- The number of in—place boat slips, lifts and buoys shall not exceed the number shown on the attached plan. Exhibit B, and in accordance with Resolution 938, in no case shall the number of authorized boat slips, lifts, or buoys exceed the number permitted in the prior year's license. H' ft ■ * Authorized Summer Density per attached plan: Bay _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Transient Slips _ _ _ Rental Slips _ _ _ Company Slips _ _ _ Sub-Total; Slips at Dock _ _ _ « Offshore Buoys _ _ _ Maximum Boats in Water _ _ _ Crystal Bay 2 -t X rSr- to- ft- Dry stacked slip for use in 1. Maximum Boats in water per prior license Other Boats (for sale/service, etc.) MAXIMUM BOAT DENSITY ON LAND AND/OR IN WATER Si'" Exceeding this maximum boat density, or exceeding the number of permitted slips, lifts or buoys is a violation of this license subject to revocation and/or prosecution for violation of Section 5.42 Subdivision 2 of the Orono Municipal Code. Authorized Number of Winter Stored Boats V.- mpst: (y r A -' Vmii-'i t.:-"SaW--lW5 {■■H •■ i*.r- ;• i ,‘ •• ■ ?.^- p' :v%;. ^'•r>V•S' f ■ ■.-t'.,. 7*jV>' 5:.rJ 'Vo’*'-"' ”5",: Exhibit A Resolution No. Page 2 III. DOCK LAYOUT (reference Exhibit B attached) Maximum authorized length of main dock feet. Docks extending beyond 200 feet and docks encroaching into required side yard setbacks are hereby specifically declared to be illegal non- conforming structures which are not permitted under this license. The application does not contain such illegal structures. All such violations are subject to prosecution under Sections 5.42 and 10.41 of the Orono Municipal Code. IV.Marina is not authorized for FUEL SALES subject to compliance with the State Fire Code. V. VI. Required number of OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES _1 SPECIAL CONDITIONS required for compliance with the ordinances of the City and/or the LMCD. The issuance of this license is subject to full compliance with these conditions. Failure to comply with these conditions is cause for license revocation and/or prosecution by the City. 1. The three slips provided at the dock are approved for use as follows; a) 1 slip to store the company boat b) 2 service slips, boats docked at these slips may not be stored overnigh^ 2. The company boat is licensed to the current owners of Crystal Bay Service - license no. MN 8816EE. 3. During 1992 owner shall review site landscaping with City staff and take acceptable steps towards compliance with plan on file (Exhibit C attached). VII. Nothing in this license shall confer upon any person for the benefit of any property any vested right to use Lake Minnetonka or the premises in a manner permitted by this resolution, but the use of Lake Minnetonka and the premises shall remain subject to such regulations and ordinances as the Ci^y and other competent regulatory authorities shall deem necessary fro*? time to time in the public interest. Issuance of this licensv. is not intended as a confirmation of licensees conformity with all ordinances regulating the site conditions and operation of the commercial use. ► • . * • ■ 1^85 PJU^ ^ ! C<TL,j^t>^ 6 “*“C5^* a. <:in-Y:iTAL GAV sc CcrLiricblo cf Survey for Union Oil Coepuny . in Lots 11 ond 12, "Lo'^lord's Pork Hennepin Cour.i-y, Kinneool. CAA /ts./ / ^/^^soLuenor^ AJo. ilO! CE to£iT Gfj7 A/2£M 5 » • % / 3:-^ . .•: -7? y//i^ //Vtr ••c - • r\ • • ••; V-v ^ ••• ■ :■•; •• • •••. >-*- fJor fktr/i^ A'lt^ Sr ^ ‘o-fooi f)iaA*vOy ti>»/ A^». 33D08&B - 3P^ /PC/ ^ . 'if • ~ K ;• • '■ i* i-v-f •' Scale Dale 1 heriiby c»irtiry thoL Ibis is a ln;c arid correct rcpro?^cr.totirn of a survey of tr.e Southerly tcur.darics of Lot 12 and the Vest ?2 feet of Lot 11, "Lydlard's Park", Lake KJlnnetonka, Henneoln County, Mlrj:csota, for the sole puj^ose of chowinj^’the-relationship of the hichway blacktop, the highway co’senent dated Aur.ust 29, 1961 (Ebc. Ur. 3330E6E), the 929.^ contour line (.hCVD 1929), and or. existing dork. 1 inch = JJO feet 1-22-ei' . Cordon £?CCoffln Rcg.yj/o. 6064 Land Survt\or and Planner Lor.^ 'L-jko, rdmciooLa ■\ TvnviitfehittiiTii\iidLa I, ■ ■ 'f-If:; -. •* * ,•»* I ^ -• *' PV « W: I II-kr^^r P' i ©.fVi:R: |fc-.fep-- f- kfe- m: ■ w fe- ®-. ffr"' sa; mw WrWr W-i' B'm-:E {■■:r> •v^ --■ P'-k- ?s-P'-- m fe. > -■■■ i:’r ^-:^' . • B ■ R'".miv I;fe: %, ; • m. ■■■ / . I V- %1 Itm J? Ik m I XX Ui l< M 0 i»BE A te'HiM.', 1 r.(v.v.'- • .; •’ t -• .Sr^-c &-‘r V s..^ Li:. |feP‘ ii§'wMm- kyki- ;V^-. *;, ■V ■ 1 h'\ I '* i' '4' 4?. ■t". V'C CITY OF ORONO License YearP.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323Phone 473—7357 Date application sent to Marina , ’^L Date application returned to City __ _ _ _ _ ANNUAL COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATIO^ " Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.42 rTTV nc nonunLtA i I ut Kjl\unw CTkiAkinC TfCrr* TPC I AltrfMUL. Wi t a W4* < 7M AhJA ^ V'V^WV 01 CEH }^ECK 71 200. C RECEIPT-TH^S ‘K YOU ^232150 cool ROl U‘ 200. P Cf section 5.42, Subdivision 2 - llclcfnl. 7o”Tn,?or7to7inTb^o“s^r TTiltnsl boat dock business" without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED C^LERK^BY ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CL JANUARY 15 OF THE LICENSE YEAR. BUSINESS INFORMATION BUSINESS OR TRADE NAME Cr^s\c^\ (o0^- - Street Address 33^ S Vlor^K- S>V^Or^ 1. 0) r\u S>V\ o r(^Mailing Address 33SS K ot-j^K Marina Phone U"} 1 OIS3 Office Phone 43101 PROPERTY IIL-ORMATION Date Property Acquired I 3 ^ _ Marina Controls Property by: ^ ownership lease from other (explain) List every occupant, other than this Marina, occupying this property: U r>r\^ Page 1 of 5 4:: Ol/Ot r ■-Vk’. -' V U-. :% ': V. T- !■.: ■>■ ■ . 7- 4 v-V- •-K }k ' ' 5. of ^bufinq lakeshore property owne-s: r\- o Karnes of abut.^ jworth/westi ~ Adi^essi jX r \ f\ jgflttth/Eastl- - - - -------— XN^e + Address) v,e. sfleeted by Marina's operation: ,ther property Owners that may be af.eote _____ (Name + Address! (Attach sheet if necessary) /f^ugc'c item)business organization : (Ch ^ individual ownership — corporation ^ —“ 7 _ — Officer anb their title: List the name of eacn p _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ __________________________:-------------—TITIesponsible for daily operlTion: r:^r------CLiuMr ------------------- --------- —------ ^ ^ T!ZT^ (-n^ marina —s open to the public during the • service personnel dock attendants —I—doch attendants ^ information, etc. others available _ _ _ _Others .»=»»= ,o.« “”;;7 ____ slip rental (moorage) ____ buoy rental (moorage) tackle sales dry storage (moorage) - trailer sales boat launching (day-use ramp) business SCHED^Sj®hec^5^P^^^^ l^oating^seasoj. only^ - & service —L ^7 AM to _S.PM am to PM J.7. »-'*V , ?:■ ., M 757 Page 2 of 5 .A .V'• .^1^ .«»-. > j»t. : . ..4 « -'i Jajk .^vk^ : f*‘ V; ‘ --6^ - r ■0 m marina security is provided by: 'y*V> POCK INFORMATION NOTE '.•t ■ ■ r'v'i INrORMAX'^^*-'* . The LMCD “®icaSon""^*Maxim^°S=k length equals ISSlriromllS^fsho-reline. Minimum side setbacks from pro, ZOO ____ _. .e___= 10 ft. minimuin se^ ^■.v/ K; ^ ,>-• • •■ shi-reline. Min^^drsetbacks from property Ilne'e'itension are: o-50 ft. from shore =_10 ft . Sm si;:”; ^2^ SHORELINE WIDTH; *;, jL : feet. * ,'■■■’v 9. fWATER DEPTH: at shore ft.; at 50 ft. out lO^' at 100 ft. out _S actual .maximum dock length from shoreline: " -------- o ft.: at 200 ft. out 00_____ ff U • 11 ft dock construction (permanent, seasonal, etc. permanent piling with seasonal cecktng ■y__ oermanenf piling a.nd decking , i^g Wooden piling _____ ” ^ ""• , , • \C mc*tal decking ^ wooden decking _—2j— a-..sT-aT- —A— . -x.-iied bv* marina_ _cusicme-canopies are installed o/. - - )( not allowed this application. aoacs Boats Stored in the Water . o '_ a) At dock slips , • b) At docks, other than sli?6 “TT __ _ _ _ _ _ c) At slides d) At lifts Oe) At moorings f) other boats in water - - - - - -- r\ Total Boats in Water page 3 of 5 1? ^;-:-'Y'• ’ ■ • • • •u ■'• ■» ' . 13. Boats Dry-Stacked for Lake Use X.nt.l Set.. Slip/Sp.ce Co»p*ny S-fvXCt S.nt.l 80* t» total Boat! a) Inside Buildings bi Outside on Racks c) Outside - other means Total'Boats Dry-3 tacJted TOMI watercraft Availability Units {iv .'••"-.I _ « ^ M 4*1 c (Add 12 * 13) llils. other Boats on Premises ^ fe .» Transient Boats (repair/service) C) used boats for sale (xnventory;^ Tn^^HP, Building Outside Storage O ____- p o Total ^ 16. Winter Storage on Premises • a) Transient boats (repair/se-^ice) ?i#‘ hi c”tra=r.S;ageicnstomer's boats) c) Inventory (new & used beats) Inside Building Outside Storage Total 17. Summer Parking "P ” TspLet"”nKS:1:i"p-^^^^^ BOOs.f. over 1.000 s.f.) = W ®rspaIerpenfAvailability Units (.6 X c) Launching railp customers ./ 10 spaces minimum per ramp cars (line 14)) *cars cars Tot3.i SD3.CSS 18. Winter Parking line ISe above Minimum 2 spaces, or retaxl spac p cars f.»lDSCAPING A^n iMPROVEM£Ni^ minimum green areas ordinances require «stablishm^t and^intan^c ^9_ S^fr“le ^‘a;r2fra*u2Li?e”y«d ol 10% of tiie lot depth, not less than 10 ft. and not more than 75 ft. 19. Describe in detail i5^all4d^this coming license etc.) and other improvements propos-d cou«_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ year: _ Paqe 4 of f t.‘ . .1. • A* yr' icr-^1/'- Ikr ■ fe: ■ fc ■ ■ - ' -U\-' pfe^. - - I - fe a- W"-' m #■m tnmV§r ’v'’v ftW B. ■ vV.V‘ ► - ►t .';. • • ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application: 1.A CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY (Per LMCD requirements) in<^eating ?hrboundaries of the marina property and the authorized Jonlc use area, the location of all structures, storage areas, docks, slips, buoys, launching ^^g^^ing leftuVe^s. Th^e drawing shall be all existing facilities, all changes from the season, and any changes proposed for the duration of th current application. 2. shrubbely, grLs areas and other foliage or landscaping features. 3. 4. A copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPLICATION. A COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION FEE according to the current City fee schedule. Initial Application @ $300.00 liriiaM?n^iSeVlf^sV00/ea Each Boat Unit (Line 13) @ $1.00/ea TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION 5.LATE FEES - Renewals - Applications for renewal shall be made no later than January 15 "f” year. ^ Cit2 shall not When^ comple?e^application is received, this "J'J’ncil ^lerred to the Marina Committee for review. will review the Marina Committee recommendation and wil thereafter pass upon the application. THE MARINA MAY OPEN FOR PUBLIC USE ONLY UPON APPRQV^ 21 LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono ^t^he City of Orono and the City's designated employees ^ saLtv and the marina property at any reasonable time to perform safety code compli^ce i^spection^. 1''^, tqqSignedDate *?<■ I* Sii". -r« ifec fe- t*t- I fe?; |:^- ■ r ' 'V .>• m ^r S{--:m: ^V‘--}k<!$ '• r ty <ms V ?V; > ? WksfmMl. *•.«*.. * K: §sMs1^rnm^ I-:--!- %•■ ■ ■m08»;.. ^ V-«.-A:> CITY OP ORONO License Tear p.O. Boac 66r Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Phone 473-7357 / <^ O?/ Date application sent to Marina 3'/' “7/ Date application returned to City f * .|, •- A / » M •• m • I m I •^,‘IHgi f ANNUAL COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION - Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.42 “rrTrr I xMr'f»^-u -•» ! ibu ^ Tt^ ^J• A J. fV VT\* V* a cut i_VU*a% • t mm mm m •u— V :# » »*. • B_l.f % *U w V'U* > » .* U ^ U / •.' I ^ 4 U. ^ ^ Itvu Section 5.42, Subdivision 2 - Licensed Required. It is unla?>fga ^01 for any person to engage or participate in the "business of docking, mooring, or storing boats or (operating) a commercial boat dock business" without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. rr- I aw • — /-• ♦ * r . V' ^ PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY APRIL 1 OF THE LICENSE YEAR. BP""- BUSINESS INFORMATION 1. BUSINESS OR TRADE NAME C PU £ Street Address Oo~ u \ ('=i'r~' / ’ ”■ c •<2:9 !?Mr-j r: 1"^r — I r c Lr Mailing Address V - V \ ;'! w * / •Marina Phone n office Phone — ; 2.PROPERTY INFORMATION Date Property Acquired Marina Controls Property by:fee ownership lease from other (explain) -i-Sr ' : I? lii'i ^4^: . List every occupant, other than this Marina, occupying this property: ________K\ori'&__________________________- Page 1 of 5 *-syv^ ■ • * **v - V , Wr ■ ,'E • L^’ %■■ i'"' t -r. i:?' 'if, I* e:V.' r' rJ /■' .xik' rV>'^.. m'i^b'/^- ■ m. ■ q ‘ ■• ■ r' *jkr.-' fc,': r‘i r't*¥' 1 r-i ;. ‘-ii ’ I 4 V'i i *^!f 4 • >'?' */'■'* ■ J 'ib ;- ■• ;•. i -1 V >i'^' P k: .- V % j. \ ■r.^ r 3. 4. Names of abutting lakeshore property owners: _ * V » V . fNorth/wp«;tl -U:\ J —. • r*' ' (Name +~Address) ^ r _ -i-'fSouth/East) --^ ■ ^'-b- -i f (Name + Address) other Property Owners that may be affected by Marina’s operation: K1 O O (Name + Address) (Attach sheet if necessary) business organization: (Check applicable^ item) V. individual ownership partnersnip corporation ^ or,r-h na-'^-er or corporate officer and their title: Li5t the name of each pa^. w**er o List name (s) of the marina manager(s) responsible tor^ daily operation M'iV ...... - - ^j;;%S!irSuS,'^«inr3--n:^ \ dock attendants repair or service personnel aoc-’s. a — ------- others available for sales/public information, etc. 3..=»•=« Slip rental (moorage) __ — -— . X A fuel salesbuoy rental (moorage)- - - ^ , X bait and tackle sales dry storage (moorage) boat launching (day-use ramp)trailer sales 6 .business schedule (check appropriate items): n vpar X during boating season onl^Open ail year ^ ^ * List proposed hours of operation: dock access _J_ retail sales & service _ _ _ AM to n PM AM to PM Page 2 of 5 •.. .. ... t g#;- ikf Vt >^1; ^ . l\ MARINA SECURITY is provided by:VI0 r. e z. DOCK INFORMATION MOTE- The LMCD defined DOCK USE AREA must be shovm on the dock plan note. „ith this aoplit-tion. Maxinut. cock i.engtn equais "“ from 92^4 shi?eline. Minimum side setbacks from property line extension are: o-50 ft. from shore = 10 ft. minimum setback 50-lOC ft- from shore = 15 ft. minimum setback 100-200 ft. from shore = 20 ft. minimum setback 8. SHORELINE WIDTH: \ feet. 8. WATER DEPTH: at shore h:.-- :;. ^ V V. ’ i .. ■ y'. .k’.V S'. ft.; at 50 ft. out ft. at 100 ft. out ft.; at 200 ft. out -P4- i. « I t10. ACTUAL MAXIMUM DOCK LENGTH from shoreline 11. DOCK CONSTRUCTION (permanent, seasonal, etc.) ---------- permanent piling with seasonal decking ^ permanent piling and dec.<ing _^ wooden piling _ _ _ metal or concrete oiling )( wooden decking V" metal decxing canopies are installed by: __ f*-w • marina customer >( not allowed SLIPS AND BOAT UNITS List the maximum number of boats storagr'^or keeping^of boats or rte^S?a1t SSSfbrtndicttrd^aL^ru^bfrL^rtL dock 'pLn submrbfed with this application. Company Service Boats .Rental Boats Rental Slip/Space Total Boat: Boats Stored in the Water a) At dock slips b) At docks, other than slips c) At slides d) At lifts e) At moorings f) Other boats in water Total Boats in Water J page 3 of 5 Deo'J^ r ^ cQ CL mw'^vr<JIS'- ,‘i'\• •\ laM|:W 00'- ’.r^ '- ■ %^*'-**' I- Ky- ; U- - -■ ^ K-'-' - *•-" *K-,' Itf! tr Ill' P-’ .IV-• 'ij-r-V, •iv" ii;- |k., ^I'r -■. m ■X ^•f- K'. ®:- -.Hi I p- 11 Boats Dry-Stacked for Lake Use ^omo^ny S4rvic« Boats R.ntal Bo*t« Hentil SliP/Space ?ot*l Bo.t. a) Inside Buildings b) Outside on Racks c) Outside - other means Total Boats Dry-Stacked (J Total Watercraft Availability Units (Add 12 & 13) Other Boats on Premises a) Transient Boats (repair/service) b) New boats for sale (inventory) c) Used boats for sale (inventory) Total Winter Storage on Premises Inside Building Outside Storage a) Transient boats (repair/service) b) Contract storage(customer's boats) c) Inventory (new & used boats) Inside Building Outside Storage r _ _ Total OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS 17. Summer Parking a) Retail sales/service customers . ^ x _ 8 spaces minimum ( + 1 per each 800s.-. o’.e . -,00(.> s.-., b) Boating customers , , , • xixx _6 spaces per 10 Availability Units (.o X (li.ne -4)) Launching ramp customers 10 spaces minimum per ramp = cars cars c)0 cars Total Spaces O 18. Winter Parking Minimum 2 spaces, or retail spaces per line 16a above -C cars LANDSCAPING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS than 10 ft. and not more than 75 ft. year; _ _ _ _ _ _^- - - - - --- - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - --- - - - - - - - - - I I '€ .Pace 4 of 5 i « • • •»r‘ rfi ..r' K‘ p? i-' f- ;v- p#/ fW‘ B-V%: w p m i^. ^;-v‘-'>-- u' • ■ ■tt^ ■; ■ H;:- li #?s- fii Ire." W- IS'' P't jn; ir ; ksi’* ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application: 1.A CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY (Per LMCD requirements) indicating the boundaries of the marina property and the authorized dock use area, the location of all structures, storage areas, docks, slips, buoys, launching ramps, gas pumps and tanks, parking areas, access areas, fencing and landscaping features. The drawing shall be updated each year to show all existing facilities, all changes from the previous season, and any changes proposed tor the duration of the current application. 2.A DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLAN for all setback areas showing existing and proposed location and sizes of all trees, shrubbery, grass areas and other foliage or landscaping features. 3. 4. A copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPLICATION, A COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION FEE according to the current City fee schedule. Initial Application @ $300.00 Renewal Application @ $200.00 Each Boat Unit (Line 12) 0 $2.00/ea Each Boat Unit (Line 13) 9 $1.00/ea TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION 5.LATE FEES “ Renewals - Applications for ren»^wal of licenses shall be made no later than April 1st of the new license vear. The City shall n^ accept renewal lice^e applicati'ons received after April 1st unless the applicatio_n is accompanied bv a late fee of $50.00. REVIEW PROCEDURE , . . ^ ^ , • , iWhen a complete application is received, this information will pe referred to the Marina Committee for review. The City Council will review the Marina Committee recommendation and will thereafter pass upon the application. THE MARINA MAY OPEN FOR PUBLIC USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to I!arina License application, and agrees and authorizes the Ci Y orono and the City's designated employees or agents to enter upon the marina property at any ji^easonable time to perform safety code compliaxifce inspections Signed LrS-ii r y-)jPi'^/ P- - ®a»i .... ;. iSv- mm mm M-- . If'W:. B?if A mm^wm^ ■ &:-rJi.' -.i.%Wpf: " illlS ® ■ ^ ' HP.; - 1*5Mwmm Mm P--'-fe*: "' ’■-' r il® " ‘ fa.. i%fe PK-liwr «. lit®® ■ TO: PROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator April 23, 1992 SUBJECT: Designa^' “ of Municipal State Aid Streets 'ns Municipal State Aid street program provides funding for major fcterial roadways. In order to receive this funding cities must designate specific streets to be part of the system. These roadways must then be constructed to meet MSA standards. It is recommended that the Council designate Leaf Street from Bayside Road to Watertown Road and Ferndale Road from Highway 12 to CSAH No. 6 as Municipal State Aid streets. Council Action Requested - Motion adopting the attached resolution establishing Municipal State Aid streets. 'V' ■'k<- :■•>:•« s?:.'K k‘:;: 'k- >■ i' % %‘kJ »i :.-v■fiy" & A RESOLOTION ESTABLISHING MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET WHEREAS, the City Engineer and City Staff have recommended to the City Council the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that cl.c streets hereinafter described should be designated as Municipal State Aid Streets under the provisions of Minnesota Law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Crono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the streets described as follows, to-wit: HSA N0.STREET FROM 109 Leaf Street Bayside Road (County Road 84) Watertown Road 110 Ferndale Road Trunk Highway 12 C.S.A.H. No. 6 be, and hereby* are established, located and designated as Municipal State Aid streets of said City, subject to the approval of the Commissioner of **ansportation of the State of Minnasrta BE IT FURTHER .x .jSOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to forward two certified copies of this resolution to the Commissioner of 'iransportation for his consideration, and that upon his approval of the designation of said road, the same be constructed, improved and maintained as a Municipal State Aid Street of the City of Orono to be numbered and known as a Municipal State Aid Street as indicated above. Adopted this 27tr day of April, 1992. ATTEST:Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk H . . 3t. ISS:?©Pi&%§l¥Lv-. ►J-*.v- ■ CERTIFICATE te" I, Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk of the City of Orono, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Orono City Council on April 21, 1992. ifeif Pr M wm :?} •V ■ th-. .Hfei W'" P-'teSr /•VV ' "'-k- wm MS'-' Wrnm^^'' ■''V ■< ^^ ^ BII^' i^ViiriitlT> • irtSiy-niiTi r fi ■ Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk i‘i i - - - .. - m • ■ •, - i * ‘.^V ^£’'. ■ '‘'■ 'mi-' •i-V»-i-‘ mp ..-*WPtfitestWPP' Pl^M' ■ M'd,MP-- ap;^:..rte S0*^- 5t^«: l?V-’ p5VA'‘ MiPm.m%-.: W' ► ■• ' V ■ V '■ ' ‘SteV Ppi^s- rJ ■■¥S" : •PU'".:'0^ PP .'V ■'' fe ■■ tet .. §m- 7 to; FROM: DATE: ^O* % Ron Moorse, City Administrator John R. Gerhardson, City Administrator April 9, 1992 p*4\>Ofg '0\ %SOBJECT: Playground Equipment - Bederwood Park On March 20, 1992, the City received and opened bids for pl3yground equipment at Bederwood Park. We received bids from four bidders as follows: 1.Minnesota Playground add for two diggers add for pea gravel vs sand $17,742 450 400 $]8,59^ 2.Miracle Equipment w/17' slide (12'6'‘; add for two diggers $21,273 498 $21,771 Miracle Equipment w/11' slide (7') add for diggers $19,861 498 r20,359 3.Earl Anderson add for two diggers .24,365 1,030 $25,395 The Park Commission appointed a three person committee to determine the needs and wants and staff prepared the bids accordingly. After the bids were opened the committee met with three of the four bidders to discuss their bid amounts and type of equipment bid. After review of the three lowest bidders, the following criteria has been developed to assist in determining the company that can provide the needs and the intent of the specifications. 1. Does the equipment meet specifications, 2. Is the equipment the quality desired. 3. Does the equipment meet current and future Americans With Disabilities requirement. 4. Cost. 5, Safety concerns. I . ■ !mi:p-^' ■to-.. if.Lx V" :•* P ,_V •' <•. •-- ...• _ >f.-'..u‘ ■* ;irsA-:- .v.^^ H.‘- ; ^iv\, - -mMr-•iMi ’ .f"- MINNESOTA PLAYGROUND 1. Yes 2. No 3. Current yes - future no 4. Low bidder US Consumer Product Safety5. Meets guidelines of Commission w t U ■ 'M: Im:. MIRACLE EQUIPMENT 1. Yes i-2e Yes >i: 3. 4. 5. No 2nd low bidder 11* slide (7*) does not meet Safety Commission US Consumer Product "►'V'-. ■ ■' .• A .'• MIRACLE EQUIPMENT 1. Yes ."• c AAim’- ' - r.*: ■• f ■Ai 'I'-i.:,- 2. Yes 3. Current yes - future no 4. 3rd low bidder 17' (12'6") slide does not meet Safety Commission US Consumer Product ': iK’'-= ■ EARL ANDERSON 1. Yes Pr - .'V J- V ^ V:w ■V'rV Yes Yes 4th low bidder 70" slide meets US Consumer Product Safety Commission f“c: A representative from the Park Commission will be available at the Council meeting to discuss the bids and the bid award. f" '1 . i • • • N.-’V ■Kf : ; •'■- ■ ^7^ J'^^- ■’"" ■■ m it®’ {i»‘..-m [b?.4- ■■dfi ;|ft> . t )L' .-■4- j. 42192.1 TO: FROH: DATE: Ron Moorse, City Administrator Tom Kuehn, Finance Director April 17, 1992 SUBJECT: Adjustments to 1991 Adopted Budgets ISSUE - Request for approval and authorization by Council to amend the 1991 departmental and fund budgets as reflected in the following discussion. DISCUSSION - A review is made at year end of the General and Special Revenue Funds to determine the need for amendments to the respective budgets of each department or fund. Preliminary results indicate the 1991 General ^ nd expenditures are approximately $135,620 or 4.5% under budget (before amendment for the 1991 squad cars purchased in 1990); while the 1991 General Fund revenues are estimated to be $192,700 or 6.3% under budget. ■ptiQ result is that the General Fund has a net unfavorable variance of $57,080 ($135,620 under expended less $192,700 reduced collections). This results in a decrease or use of fund balance in the amount of $57,080. The revenue shortfall of $192,700 ir comprised primarily of the following sources being under budget: building and general permits, conditional use-var iances-plan chec)< fees and amounts rebilled to developers, court fines, interest income, real estate taxes, police service contracts and transfers from other funds. - Building permits - general permits - variances - etc. decrease due to housing and construction downturn. Court fines - down due partly from decrease in tickets issued 1,869 in 1990; 1,426 in 1991; 24% decrease (but tickets issued in TAB form starting about mid 1990) and reduced amount of fines being imposed. Interest down due to steady decline in rates of return. - Real estate taxes under collected 2.2% 1991 vs. 1.4% under collected 1990. Police service contracts shortfall due to application of net 1990 credits applied to 1991 billings, $10,518; write off of 1/2 prior year debit due from Long Lake of $6,704 and reduction of service request by Long Lake $4,276. f'’'Mfe'.. , it#**'-''•i,,, • I-'-I Revenue Source Revenue Budget Actua1 Revenue (Under) budget Amount % Property taxes Building & general permits Cond Use/Var/Plan/Developer Court fines Co»op agree - police Interest income Transfers in $1,657,240 108,000 93,000 110,000 584,600 53,300 120,370 $1,620,232 65,448 61,955 71,483 563,106 43,893 102,690 $(37,008) (42,552) (31,045) (38,517) (21,494) (9,402) (17,680) (2.2)% (60.6) (33.4) (35.0) (3.7) (17.6) (14.7) mt.'i f ii. /•tv siiiijf'i';'’;! The Park and Improvement and Equipment Outlay Special Revenue Funds are in need of amendments to revenue and expenditure budgets. Revenue adjustments are for the following: PARK FUND - Park dedication fees are down due to the decreased buiIding activities; however, interest income is slightly over the estimate. IMP AND EQUIP OUTLAY FUND - Charges to user departments were higher than estimated for the copy and postage machines; interest income is under the budget estimate; and certain used equipment was traded at the time of replacement. BUILDING OUTLAY FUND - Interest income is greater than estimated due to no significant disbursements for the land purchase before October, and the'$319,190 close out of a completed debt fund to the building fund in July. A summary of requested expenditure budget amendments in the following discussion. presented GENERAL FUND Although the actual 1991 General Fund expenditures were si9P1fican11y under budget in totalf there are a number of expenditure items that were over budget. Tt has bee;i staff's practice to advise the Council of these items, and request budget amendments concerning these items. A summary of the requested amendments is presented in the following discussion: The City Council budget needs an increase of $450 for legal publishing regarding the truth in taxation hearings. The Administration budget needs an increase of $750 for supplies and postage expenditures. The Finance Department needs a $5,400 increase in the personal services budget as the assistant finance director position was being re—eva1uated, resulting in a step and level adjustment, and the finance director reached the top step in 1991. Approprijtion increases are needed in the data processing budget of $1,550 and A i»Vrur S V ilviv-: ip 1•‘l^ '■ ■ ,^.v ^<;. r.' v-r ■ tffi /■ the office equipment maintenance of $200. As was stated in the 1 990 budget adjustments for the Police Department that the 1991 squad cars purchased in December 1990 require a reduction in the 1991 budget of $39,050. The Fire Protection budget requires an increase of $3,600 for the area served by Long Lake. The Emergency Preparedness budget needs an increase of $3,050 to pay for the Orono share of the Minnetonka Beach siren, as previously agreed. The Animal Control Department needs $1,560 increase for personal service costs; $90 for printing and $800 for automotive maintenance and repair costs. The Recycling/Pick-up Program Department budget needs an increase in the personal services budget for $9,850 to cover the costs of the spring and fall clean up programs and the Saturday yard waste disposal program. The participation and volume of material received was much greater than in prior years, requiring substantially more maintenance staff time. The Department also needs a $1,550 increase to the postage and printing budgets for the communication mailings during the year. The Special Police Services and Consulting for land use applications requires increases of $1,100 for personal services and $5,300 for consultants. These costs are covered by charges for providing the services . When the 1991 budget was adopted provision was made in the Special Projects/Contingency Department to appropriate $17,500 for salary and retirement benefit adjustments in accordance with the adopted compensation plan. At this time amendments are required for allocation of $15,250 of the personal service contingency. There are other re-allocations for various General Fund departments as well as for those previously mentioned; however, the remaining re-allocations are internal within each department and have no effect on the total departmnet budget or the total General Fund Budget. h. T.^ -L---------O.S..1 ---------.. ..... a.;. Summary of General Fund budget adjustments Expenditures Department/Purpose City Council Administration Finance Police Fire Protection Emergency Preparedness II '^ Animal Control Recycling/Pickup Special Consulting & Police Services Special Revenue Funds PARK FOND Capital Outlay Planning Project ■■ >TOTALS TfV W?-': pi: Adopted Requested Amended Budget Amendment Budget $ 65,430 $ 450 $65,880 170,570 750 171,320 144,150 7,150 151,300 1,073,870 (39,050)1 ,034,820 180,020 3,600 183,620 3,670 3,050 6,720 11,440 2,450 13,890 68,390 11,400 79,790 32,250 6,400 38,560 $ 11,100 $(11,100)-0- -0-1,750 $1,750 $ 11,100 3=2:=: = =: = =: = = $ (9,350)$1,750 IMP & EQUIP OUTLAY FUND Capital Outlay 1991 budget 61,350 $(14,600)46,750 c.;'- ffin ■ %rmy^y;&my The decreases in the Special Pevenue Funds budgets are due to certain items/projects not being purchased and/or being purchased at less than anticipated costs. Special Revenue Funds revenue budgets amendments are as follows: PARK FUND SW- i" Interest income Park dedication fees m TOTALS IMP & EQUIP OUTLAY FUND User fees Interest income Sale of equipment Transfers from other funds ■ TOTALSam $14.000 30.000 $ 650 (21,000) $14,650 9,000 $44,000 $(20,350)$23,650 sssassss:3 a $3,350 $ 350 $3,700 22,000 (6,750)15,250 -0-300 300 60,750 -0-60,750 $86,100 $ (6,100)$80,000 r ,''»v .: -'i i • .- . V . ;. *fe.:c.r- " Vm--,.T*; - -TUZ^-i &% BUILDING OUTLAY FONDIj,,- - - - - - - - - - - - Adopted Budqet Requested Amendment Amended Budqet 'f- Interest income $ 169,640 $ 10,330 $ 179,970 §M\ PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by _, to approve the budget amendments to the 199r”General Fund departmental budgets as presented, resulting in a budget decrease from $3,040,260 to $3,021,210; and to approve the amendments to the Park Fund, the Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund, and the Building Outlay Fund expenditure and revenue budgets as presented. Ayes __, Nays Wj- •> tO;. ife ■ ■ W f<\,r y^: /• B: ¥' hr “h i* j.-m i- ■ - ,. ir- ^ pi- '<;■ •■<r T- > < ■ ■ • r ' ■■#S®If#*''7^■-- ■mt'P.' ':’^y-‘Vimg» # m pifc' p»- Rfi- mm. S'< •S.'"^r ’<■ :;^- Wm ■ #' ■> w Wk -t ,-,. te# : 3k.' -‘^ MM' K. pi |llv Isr- "" '5;e^-‘^-;:" •• .4': m0il* 0V R» ^ PK'- ■fc*' 'S-V'C-yr SS?:.-.m MB0-i#> TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator April 24, 1992 April 29 Board of Review Meeting ^9 e ->%v The Board of Review meeting will be held on Wednesday, April 29 at 7:00 p.m. I have attached materials provided by Rolf Erickson concerning 1992 assessments. i &.,i--r'n*--- -----rrrm* ■• ‘ '■' IS3x'?'‘Sv, '<«: US'*., l|it ■ ,,‘V. -r.;*# WM:' ■ V ■ p»iS iSaa.. siSSf i.‘- mm^ ‘p% :• ^P"--pS^fe:;>iV,. 7 r./^rnm- ■ S H§’fCiu:i', pS:: 3#" . ■sllisls'S '■■: '.ifl^.a- .-V 0m^ iisi#'■ ^ ^*?7 ■ . • t'l- ■ *** ^ ^ 1 • < /; . '■ Wpm:^ Wi 0:.\. iJW- ' l>P3.?v . %'^P> ■ tf-0m'' V tea. ps. “‘-ipa-;:;.-V «».■:• :;v- >< TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Mayor Peterson and Orono City CounclImembers Rolf Erickson, Orono City Assessor April 2, 1992 Board of Review for January 2, 1992 Assesinent 1992 ASSESSMENT STATISTICS Parcels Revalued: Parcels Inspected: All parcels are revalued each year Sections 7, 17 & 18 (see attached map) Number of Parcels in Quartile: Residential Commercial/Industrlal Land Total 700 24 79 903 Number of Exempt Parcels Appraised;Approx. 280 Total Parcles in City : (6-26-91) 3,970 Commercial 77 Farm 38 Industrial 6 Residential 2,892 Apartment 2 Land and Misc 955 Total Market Value:1-2-91 $604,793,400 1-2-92 $626,166,800 New Improvements $5,649,800 Total Valuation Changes by Property Class 1-7-92 over 12-91: Residential Lakeshore -.4% Residential Off Lake + 4.4% Commercial -4.7% Industrial 0% Farm + 7.0% Vacant Land +51.7%* *due to repeal of platting law-May be reinstated I 4 ■ rr : -7 te ;"it. i f v ;-,'^ " :te-' I I^S''te.;,te'S ■B;.to-i:feSi%^^vfcm-. ittr'iL M •Nt^ y •■ •■ P: ■%sy r SsH"'"' fife- :■ til.-:.ii»" Senior Center HOME OP THE VWESTONKA SENIOR CITIZENS, INC. • 5600 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364 612-472-0347 April 15, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Council Members: The month of May has been designated by the govern ment to be Older Americans Month. The Westonka Senior Citizens Center will celebrate the week of May 4th through 8th as Senior Citizens We®k. We are offering a week-long series of events to mark the occasion, hoping our friends in our four communities will come and share the festivities with us. You will be receiv ing a special invitation to our Business Friends Breakfast during that week. We would appreciat2 having the mayors of our four cities proclaim the week of May 4th through 8th as Westonka Senior Citizens Week. WmMt.mfL tefew. 'WH " ■■ : Sincerely, Doris LeGault, President A Non-profit Orgonizstion Serving Tits Communities Of Mound ft Orono 9 Spring Park a Minnotnstn ■j.-V W^ti>v' ■■ ■ te- I ■ • ■ ^■: tev i- P:- ii. K'^'" ?•■ ■ p: Sv ■ Mr: fi- WiP ::r ■Ur--:y ?£< ri<^ . ‘•V*, : ■t ‘t .V' ■ w •• ■?V &■ :f #5^ ® I--’iWr :^x' «;;■ MmL. \ RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING WESTONKA SENIOR CENTER WEEK MAY 4-8 WHEREAS, we need to realize now, more than ever, what a resource our older Americans are, and that the abilities of older Americans to invest our country with their knowledqe, creativity and experience cannot be denied; and WHEREAS, senior centers offer valuable service to the community in providing our senior citizens the benefits of good fellowship, encouragement and support, the opportunity to help themselves and each other, and offering service of access to community services as needed; and WHEREAS, the month of May has been proclaimed Older Americans Month, and communities across the country are giving special recognition to the roll of senior centers; THEREFORE, we hereby proclaim May 4th through May 8th as Westonka Senior. Citizens Center Week in celebration of past accomplishments and encouragement for continuation of involvement and contribution to our Westonka Community. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held April 27, 1992. ATTEST:Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Dorothy M.Hallin. City Clerk mm-- -;r $h-. Ki-a"'ip t‘ fy jk-’ .iH m i.W-.^Sr To: From: Date: Subject: Ron Moorse, City Administrator ji//^'\ // John R. Gerhardson, Public Works DirectorAv ^ <^^ ^ Resolution Directing City Engineer Perform FeasiJ^i^ity Study - Old Crystal Bay Road April 21, 1992 *’<? During the past several months, the Orono Park Commission and Hennepin Parks have been discussing the feasibility of a Bike/Hike Trail on Old Crystal Bay Road that would connect Baker Park to the Luce Line Nature Trail. Hennepin P\rks has prepared a conceptual plan that was reviewed by the Orono Park Commission on April 6, 1992, It is the Park Commission's intent to recommend to the Orono Council to proceed with construction of the trail. It has been determined that this project would qualify as a Municipal State Aid Project (MSA) and that Orono's share of the cost would be paid for from the MSA fund. The proper procedure would be for the Council to adopt a resolution directing the City Engineer to perform a feasibility study. I have prepared a resolution for Council review and action. Isv Ki te fe-wf"f-i '*' :r" Ki $ I?: 'HJm : l--’K-n W ' m.. *•>>f-S' • Si.W- fe'?'- ' A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO PERFORM A FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR A BIKE/HIKE TRAIL ON OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD flHBRBASr the City of Orono is a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota? and WHEREAS, the City of Orono has within its boundaries certain streets that are considered Municipal State Aid streets (MSA); and WHEREAS, the City of Orono has developed a conceptual overall Bike/Hike Trail map; and WHEREAS, Old Crystal Bay Road is an MSA road and is one of the roads designated on the conceptual Bike/Hike Trail map; and WHEREAS, the City of Orono wishes to determine the feasibility of a Bike/Hike Trail on Old Cryrtal Bay Road from the Luce Line Nature Trail to County Road 6. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Orono Council does hereby direct the City Engineer to conduct a feasibility study and to report those findings to the Council upon completion of the report. Adopted by the City Council of the C*ty of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 27th day of April, 1992. ATTEST: Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of April, 1992, by Barbara A, Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 1 of 1 A 1 > i- ! ' -V • 1 > ,’v. y'rf-* ...i. ill. w4 0 mb'- A 0I’ip. t^ 0># -^<0^ ' 4fj /=^ TO Mayor and City Council FROM: Ron Moorse, City Administrator DATE: April 23, 1992 SUBJECT: Equipment Purchase Public Works % ' f9^ </ ■’■*i J At the March 23 Council meeting the Council tabled the bid award concerning the replacement of a utility tractor due to questions remaining concerning the impact of State Budget problems on the city's finances. The final result of the Legislative session was the extension of the 6.5% sales tax to the purchases of all local government jurisdictions. This change goes into effect on June 1, 1992. The Finance Director has estimated that the sales tax will add approximately $20,000 to the 1992 city budget. This assumes that as many newly taxable items as possible are purchased prior to June 1. Staff will prepare recommendations for expenditure reductions to offset the sales tax cost. In the interim, it is important that the city move ahead to purchase priority capital items prior to June 1. The utility tractor is a priprity because it replaces a tractor that can no longer be used for the city's mowing activities. It is recommended that we move ahead with the purchase of the utility tractor at this time. The attached memo summarizes the bids received for the replacement of the utility tractor. * ft.m • • ■ i'' ■j '' '4' /. -y ^3;^ ■!■ ,' •' • ■« - - r V -it W.'^- 1 ‘’ f: kvP: fe: *•: L'-T- ■ r’^l- ,U. r '.V.* y yt’4 !/L' -K-; ir'-i-v ■■•' I';-':- \h t „ :.v',ii-’'- ■ •-■•..;; K': t'P' ,pfSr ' X'!.-' ' -:^ % ,‘,' X-: S r •* / . um \- J r. • •C^:^ ■p'-''te'" KVv>- •:• ^ i ■■■ ‘ fe.'.-' ' i^’ w ■ i'fv.. ■ TO:Ron Moorse, City Administrator PROM: DATE: John R. Gerhardson March 18, 1992 SUBJECT: Equipment Purchase - Public Works For the 1992 Budget, Public Works allocated an amount for replacement of the utility tractor with side mount flail mower. On Wednesday, March 18, 1992, we received and opened the tractor and mowers. sea led bids for The following is the bid tabulation. Bid #1Long Lake Ford Tractor Ford Model 4630 Edwards Mower Model 7472 Demo Less Trade-in Less Special Paint Deduct $7,600.00 1,200.00 Total Bid #2Long Lake Ford Tractor Ford Model 4630 Edwards Mower Model 7472 HD Special Less Trade-in Less Special Paint Deduct $7,600.00 900.00 TOTAL Long Lake Ford Tractor Ford Model 4630 Tiger TSF75 Mower Bid #3 Less Trade-in Less Special Paint Deduct $7,600.00 1,100.00 TOTAL $26,677.00 7,300.00 $33,977.00 $ 8,800.00 $25,177.00 $26,677.00 8,600.00 $35,277.00 $ 8,500.00 $26,777.00 $26,677.00 8,200.00 $34,877.00 $ 8,700.00 $26,177.00 ■ i-■V-V iX ■f^y-w '.} ... ; ,.•••. . >1* •.•« ' V ■; *• ’’ ' AiJi- ^ v'SV V‘- jJv; 4'.^ ' ’ 4 i J V'..A>' i T' $ >„ >1:^ ■ •4 • -^m* m m SV; ,1^ ^Oi y '%> LIST OP LICENSES FCR COUNCIL APPRg^^ ^ y FOR MEETING OP April 27, 1992 e t % Special Event - Minnesota Multiple Sclerosis Society- Bike Ride - Saturday, May 9th approximately 8 a.m..- 4 p.m. Garbage & Refuse License - East Tonka Sanitation Woodlake Sanitary Service 1 \ m •• • t":; M . PARADES & SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT APPLICATION ^ CITY OP ORONOr MINNESOTA Permit Fee: $50.'^Phone Number: Name 1^0 ■ Address; • . S^/ City, State, Zip:•5'S^aO - J.?^/ m..-P'V |r •£ It Location of Parade or Event: _ is ^ \rnn-i^ Person(s) and/or Organization (s) Handling the Event: ^C-'^SL'*€^ hnS Sodr. h /, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date of Event: \y\zt\i Hours of Event: <r^^yn — Reason or Purpose: kyj< tW-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J Insurance Company: Ht^.Co Copy of insurance certificates to be submi Amount:Lj±n.lliai submitted with this application. I.am aware of all applicable State and other laws regarding parades and special events and will abide by same. I also agree to hold the City of Orono harmless from all liabilities that may arise directly or indirectly from the parade or special event approved by the granting of thisL^^tmiiTwMi? L-rkjAkirc r'CCTrc I #VrtiVi.L. Cl / ici- 00000 U l ICC l> r.i rcki X.' X iJUl » --------Tf— 4/ V' • CA A • VSignature Date . tO / i n ! /!;') ’ f/t> f TAG-• » X V/ C' V' i" j. M X I 7 w' X u* tf:-^Approved: ir Denied:Bv: |; Remarks : 'Tj-fsX^L. C/vn 4vt ?\ (l>v^r)-^ (2^ l§- m- I?*!.. fK ROSlI^'^IINNESOTA MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIEl Y2344 Nicollet Avenue Suite 280 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55404-3"Sl 612-870-1500 or 1-800-582-5296 (both Voice & TDD) FAX; 612-S70-0265——----------^u w April 10, 1992 Apa ^ 6 r-'''- r*i/r UIIXJ FICE t • w' V « V — n u* V • VLX0\} M TOP 04/16. Lkr mp- iiit: Sc I i- ■' City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 ATTN: Dorothy Hamline Dear Dorothy: I am writing you in regard to the 1992 MS 50 spring bike tour. Here are the details of the event that you reque.sted for a one time special event permit. The MS 50 will take plac'. on Saturday, May 9th, 1992. Participants will start and finish at Eisenhower Community Center in Hopkins. basically, the tour is from Hopkins to Watertown and back. I hai'e incluied a route mip and a copy of our insurance. The ride will begin promptly at 6:00 a.m. on Saturday morning. Riders will ride north to the Luce Line Trail and follow the trail west to Watertown. In Watertown, they v/ill turn around and follow County Highway 20 back east returning to Hopkins. Rest st-ps are highlighted in yellow on the included map. The Deportment of Natural Resources is issuing a special events permit to use the trail on that day. The rest stops will be staffed by 4 to 6 volunteers. Volunteers will park in available parking spaces and walk to the rest stop site to alleviate congestion at the rest stop area. Traffic Control: All participants will comply with local traffic markings, signs and signals as they would if they were riding alone. Approaching motorists will be notified of the approaching tour in two ways. ^irst, the cyclists will be led, patrolled and followed by ten professional motorcycle escorts with flashing hazard and warning lights. Secondly, the route will be patrolled by five sag wagons with trained medical professionals inside. The sag vehicles will have large orange "Caution Bike Tour" ligns and slow moving vehicle signs posted on the rear and side panels. Rfni--r/}h>r u.-> in yn:ir f^n irur. t'* Page 2 We will also contact all the locax/area hospitals and emergency teams to no-ify them of our event prior to the tour. We are expecting appro.ximately 1,50C cyclists to participate in the MS 50. 1 want to stre?^^ "hat this is not a race. The MS 50 is designed to offer -ike enthusiasts of all levels the opportunity to enpoy spring cycling and the beauty of the west metropolitan area. As I previously mentioned, the bike tour will begin 8:00 a.m. Saturday morning. We are going to have a staggered start and let the participants go in groups of 50 to 100. The average cyclist rides at approximately 10 m.p.h. The first riders should reach ^rono at 8:45 a.m. and should be out of Orono by 3:00 p.m. at the latest. I hope that I have included everything that you need. you have any aaestions or concern.c, or if I have left anything out, please feel free to ca.Ll me at 8-0--500 or 1-800-58^-52^6. I will contact you in the ne.xt week to work out details that may need changing. Sincerely, 'i' S' fV"' Tom Kessler Special Events Enclosure pii' sk/1036SF llarBli t KcLennaa lncorporat#d AVBBUB o£ th* AaBricaa Hair York, NY 10036-2774 dATX fWM/oo/rr) ______________________________ 11/01/91 EXTEHO 0« alter the. CX7VERAGE VFOROeO BY T>€ POUOti BCJ3W COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE CO jPAWT a letter "NATIONAL UNION TIRg INS. CO. iMim KXTIOHAL multiple sclerosis SOCIETY 205 ViBT 42ND STREET HEW YORK, NY 10 017 Minnesota North Star Chapter WSSS5 CSDMPAKT n letter ^ LETTER COUPAKT ^ LETTER letter INCMCATEa >«TW«TVmAWOING AWYREOUI^^r cc^om^ O mEAFJN IS SMSJCCY to ajj . TH€ tho,m_ COmPIOTTE >AAY 8C »SSU£0 Oft MAYTHE REDUCED 3Y PAiO C^MS ________________cono:t:o»%‘S cr 3uc?; RCLiCico. u«p^» smov^h may kav ^ stew ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CO TR OHf^^ k coktractorts prot TVWC OR MAUAAMCC kxjct NUU&CR POLCT Ef^CTMI CM.TE (UU/OO/TYJ POUCr CA^RATXX qa TT ;uu/tC/TY) a/i ta^rm TXXjgA^Pi COMMEROAL general UAflUTY GLA 5905727 10/01/91'10/01/92 OENCAA. AO u REG a TE 200C AirroMooue LMAurr awy aoto all owned autos 3Ch€DULJED AUTOS hired AUTOS NUN-OWhCD ALTTOS CMUQE LIABIJTY 1 FCRSONAL k ADvOmSiHG ikAJRT 11 lOOC , each occurrence it lOOC f 1 lOOC WCDOk. EXPENSE {Af*f ar>m o-*rMo)l‘1C , COM8l»^ 1 1 S^hGUE wjurr 1 i ■ ..V'S:. BCC4.>^ i jNJU^rr i ! •' D*» *0<^' t ‘ BCOt’' j ' LSJU^5^ 1 I 1^' »cc*0«nr] 1 S 1 !------------------------ i **POVFT> j 3AJ-UU3E s UAMXnr OTHER THAW UU0RSLLA PO«U EACH OCCURRENCE AG u ^GAT c STATUTORY f^Ao* AcciaeKT (DISEASE —L)*urn (DISEASE—Each cik-WMTfEE oocivnnaN or oRCiiAnoMtAJOCATx>«/>^>iaxVREi nWCTK3K5/W9^aAL fT. 4 CERlTmCATEHOILI^. ^ ^ V *CO«0 2f-S /i/Ml CAHCHLIATION _ V. •-^ ■ SHOULD AKV OP the ABCvf 0=SCHIB£2 POLIOES BE CANCELLED BEPOaE th€ expiration DATE THEPcOP. the ISSUING company Wl'U. ENO£AVOfl TO 3 0 PAYG WR’TTEN notice to the DEPTIFIC a TE HOLDGP nam P'. TO THE L£r4 but c^^u RE 'C such .C-C c 'MPOSE NOpS-iAnON Oft Ll^lU-v D^ *KT A..NO U^N -V.E .TS >.-^-nT^ a,:^-^s-.T.YES, Vr'V i « • / ^ I ' y./ y i r-. •^c:r^3d / / / .*► I I 4 #• *L«h»ll .tn.;^.l 5Jf«^ V'i»TiSj •'1#' .*» •5'* C • • • ( 9 %%»*j •••« or>i|i^ !f W-'? lilji )l f * . ^ • —'l 1 :•. 1^ - -!(• •«*••••• •• • t I • U«Ml« • • . *pfi' f«^jr«.j;jj>, *tii_ J-.' t #a; L r :»! 't«/fM«on *|5 L 1\ Medina.. m1 ~M !E0 j rrr^ i ■H^t 2?'f Pliir rt -il\a !?..;<•' j C'f’il .V‘. ‘ i '•■'• _ || -(.>»«______ “uuan 1 ‘hUV-*.,^^ ' V..*:. M I :LS,--|..^_.l.j rx_0: ■ » I— *••■ f:b i: • rS;?' «•«# ^ :<.*• ••r{ •A. ..Vl'•»!l~l.i^•! U* - ii/ij •# • 1 * V• :S ■f^ I* <»“©^ ^1-• • kK-'>a P\\ I r©-" . i i.43cLd-^ , wflnnlriQi Oa)p i-V? Wr vl A. TSTZifeX. fc^.iBTiiriti 'SiUi * - -' i*»« <1 Tonkr^ < »yf ♦» • i QrvprifdC^. Mir.s • • • • ' . ■ '»*’ •' • vr-if'B!' OP ORONO i*.0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 License Year Date Received Fee Paid _ _ InitiaIs garbage & REFUSE COLLECTOR'S LICENSE APPLICATION Buslness/^nn Address O^i .1 ss c (Strefet) ■ / , ' ZZ -7 A Business Phone Number yy / -/ L. (City)(State) (3ip Code) '/ (City)/ (State) (Zip tode(Street! - - Phone Number _________ Check one: _______ Individual ------c^Parinersh.p ----------- Corporation Number of Vehicles to be used in Orono -i Description of Vehicles (attached list if more,. Loaded Loaded License NumberYear Mfgr. Gross Wt. Rear Axle /Jt. si..-/ tar- - - - - -- - -- U/6 . 7 f L g n :> t; n g..i ^ 7 iITr vF OROaO £ OFFICE: » General area of City served . C? Z- I 7 ! f " I )1 Q£H Schedule of Collection charges/ dates 1 mTAI I U i^cTT 45.00 M 9 W u ■ ^U W M Tn /i.iJv.V' Approximate number of customers in O^no Location of dumping area 7'r/— o T iJl T> uI •V i ~ /VI i >-•. vv vocation of dumping ____——/---------------- ^rOM^7o7'Til7'Ai7L7ck7lVN'To7rc7'HpZETE/ YOU MOST ENCLOSE THE FOLLOWING: / ^ c I* r)’ fj T.. 1UAV V ri!!Jm4: : .srp.i' ras.-; rfa;^ 7 w‘ <J:. Surety bond in the amount of $1,000. ^'^°°{^2tion^claase. *^"Annua/£ee is a S100,000-$300,000-S50,000, and 10- $30.00 transfer fee (if applicable). S30.00 flat rate fee, plus $15/trucK^^ana^ajj jjjj u_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ;orci«a;7;NL;r77.;i-';:7;7o^ =^?^:/!rp«!?yr Approval ueniai - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ Signatur^ of cTly Official /5 ■ Da te Fiw It Aiff I ' ..Tfnr of ORONO ). Box 66 fstal Bay, MN 553^3 3-7357 License Year bate Received Fee Paid Initials W’'- • GARBAGE & REFUSE COLLECTOR'S LICENSE APPLICATION I'cAPR 2 0 I undersigned wishes to operate the indicated business in the City of Orono and cewith makes application for* a “license to do so. n ^-/llyrry^JL n y/ioidLness/Fim Iress______*fonn ________^^ (Street) ■Iness Phone Number ///—//o/_____ 1 Q/yj\H /T -g. 'yo (State) (Zip Code) lULcanb's Name _ OSS V .3* y *» /.L. A/ -71^. <i (Street) BOe Number ______^ 3 2 ICicy)(3 Late ) (^ ^ ^ W — ick One:Individual Partnership Corporation liber of Vehicles to be used in Orono __ v' icription of Vehicles (attached list if more): Loaded Loadea iiir Hfqr. Gross wt. Rear Axle Wt. ^License Number i_ nyL [nez suL 5~A 0 oa 1^.000 IS.OOO /S./)0n !G VLL 73^13 7-0 va go 600... /3 '/U6I0S3 leral area of City served I j liuvuk ^,4 VA J. ^ W JL V^W JUW w W . . -------------------J -I—»— RA/\Aii/ut. J 9^.00 Ta^ —/7^D.—fl23/=_£?£ f TTv r-r r<wnm L 4 I f SJI U*M UitU i ‘‘AffT ticrrrc ................................f J iL fc-t ii»r*nui- CM 4 -•! i-‘"7 vi'VW S'0 0..L.^tCH ni rti) V'l i*k.M Yl t u vr f fc.’ • V' V -c: M I »..* • L' V' 'im croT^ ;• VP//MI.CI..I/ t I f fnms t uu Ujoximate number of customers in Orono ____ ation of dumping area tr'.P.IK, _£bc,> f ORDER FOR THIS APPLICATION TO BE COMPLETE, YOU MUST ENCLOSE THE FOLLOWING: #1 Art __ _ _ __ SI '^/hrnck. and a S30.00 transfer fee (if applicable) .0.00 flat rate fee, plus $15/truck, and a $30 im the owner and operator of the above business and I have paid all license taxes required by law. The above information is correct. P9^imjg-A—(TU,rA^^,Lr^) \)^te ^ ' ~ )R CITY OSB ONLY: After review of application , ’ Approval Deni.a 1 ji<gnayure of Citof City Official Lj. Z.I - i . •• Ji '6' U-- \tfi ‘ I " I'V:n ^ 1^?!« S' •-. ►V lA * »* • ► • ?- Ji?" ►i'- ?/• f^r. f - ■r kri tjv • « b • i-' r K'F- s 04/12/92 PR CB PRREGOR 130 EMP » NAME 273182399 701168211 471688060 470145252 474563339 476921819 471840871 475443862 472503991 469526026 476643387 475989721 474702763 474244066 468821018 472529007 349240494 525603688 468701868 507585424 558500111 469686562 153228402 468420832 469087884 474667812 475380151 477500666 475444249 477463877 471569863 470468470 477647279 475604753 504260307 472500574 121262417 472500297 480843542 476018974 477700023 334506281 477028779 468909535 476783251 470700901 469848107 ACKERMAN. ALBERT J ANDERSEN. WILBUR F ANDEP,SON. BRUCE L BERG. VERNICE J BOBZIEN. SUE A BORIS, SCOTT W BOSMA. JAMIE L BRINKHAUS. JOHN F CHESWICK. GARY B CORNICK. JAMES L DELANEY. JANE E DEMBOUSKI. JAY C EISINGER. RUTH D ELLIOTT. VALERIA M ENGLISH III, IRVING ERICKSON. KURT R ERICSON. BARBARA E FINKELSTEIN. DOROTHY 13 FISCHENICH, DAN T FRITZLER. JOHN M GAOBAW. ARLISS A GAFFRON, MICHAEL P GASCH, MARJORIE GERHARDSON. JOHN P GOMAN, DAVID J GREGORY, JAMES D HALLIN, DOROTHY M HANSEN STEVEN C HANSING, CAROL J HASEMAN, CAROLE JOHNSON, BRADLEY P JOHNSON, JAN KARNITZ. RICKY 0 KENNEN, JANICE M KNUTSON, CHARLOTTE KUEHN, THOMAS M MABUSTH, JEANNE A MADDEN, ROSE MCNICHOLS, DAVID L MILLS JR. WALTER H MOORSE, RONALD J MOROWCZYNSKI. JAMES NELSON. DAVID D OBERAIGNER, SCOTT G OBRIEN, RANDY L OMAN. LYLE E PALMER, GREGORY A 567247200 426906365 475382983 473746173 473035954 470566529 474122355 469629194 475569177 101268716 468149396 267460042 472563051 474663296 470704904 475505292 468629488 50040319^ 477881539 PEASLEY, CHRISTINE 13 POWELL, LOU ANN 13 OUAST, WAYNE A 92 RATHBUN. BARRY J 92 RAUSCHENDOKFER DORO 13 SCHOENHOFF. JOHN B 31 SIFORD RUBY 13 SKREEN, DALE S 42 STEFFENHAGEN. RONALD 93 STEVENS, BETTY G 93 STUBBS CHERRY C 13 SULLIVAN, STEPHEN X 31 THOMTON. MARK R 31 TOMCHECK, LAWRENCE F 31 TOMCZYK. MARK W 31 VANG, BRUCE L 33 VEE. LINDA S 12 WALTERS, LINDA G 15 WECKMAN, STEPHEN J 33 V) ^ YTD CURRENT DPT GROSS GROSS n 82 50 82 501390 TO 90 00 31 13467 29 1631 34 13 80 OC 80 00 31 7879 99 987 52 3 J 1277 20 381 10 12 452b 43 570 48 42 12516 51 1568 56 31 13184 00 1648 00 31 14338 71 1662 13 33 165 38 165 33 31 11130 09 H70 19 13 90 00 90 00 13 90 00 90 00 31 13712 24 1772 32 31 12136 56 1526 40 13 90 00 90 00 13 90 00 90 00 31 14257 68 1758 51 31 12867 28 1599 04 13 90 00 90 00 33 11442 90 1434.01 13 lOi.75 101 75 42 16109 05 1885 69 35 1155 32 125 66 42 10592 80 1224 04 12 9857 08 1235 28 42 9072 70 1469 19 31 4495 36 603.29 12 677b 51 839.36 31 12891 59 1497.84 13 90 00 90.00 31 1867 09 124.11 31 2065 62 240.20 15 7879 95 987 51 Id 16833 75 2109 60 33 14330.13 1795 85 13 90.00 90 00 31 2282 24 1141 12 93 118 25 118 25 12 17107 20 2038.40 31 13074 64 1820 81 35 1567 38 234 92 42 8551 13 948 87 92 9435.10 1443 76 33 11442.85 1434 0? 42 8087.68 948 36 90 90 11209 9124 90 1445 90 8806 71 9858 26 90 90 15291 11793 12692 12177 9857 7263 87 8645 89 8225 39 00 00 30 74 00 09 00 63 00 41 47 74 94 06 90 90 1329 1054 90 543 90 1117 1235 90 90 1941 1469 1469 1497 84 1235 28 1055 1145 1030 00 00 76 32 00 84 00 70 28 63 00 12 28 28 35 28 81 60,091 66 I ►j: *■ I / . Xo toocn ui xxxxxxxxxxxonooooooooo (O(DCD<D(OUD(OlD0D(OU0 OOOOOOOOOOO cn i/» tn i-H <-T» LTI *yl Xo to o Kft CJ Xn ir> CD LTl X c:> u> o '.n Xo (O o cn O O o to •N* ID IM OOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOO lOIOCOlDCOIDIOIDIOIDiO (OIDCOCDIDCOCOCOIOCOID is>N>rorofs>roroK)N)N>ro O 'x. O to 'v. CO ro o o to ID ro o o to CD K) O o CD \ CO fSJ U)m CO -4 CD C -< >z Igso 5o X •s4 Ok I C/)CO(/)C/)C/)</)COtOC/)(/)t/> >>>>>>>>>>> OOOOOOOOOOO >>>>>>>>>>> iOCOCJUlCJCJCOCJCOCJCD touitncntnificnuitncf»ui ‘^'O^OOOOOOOO 4>fcCJro»—►— I I I f I I I I I t ISJ ►- I I I I I I I I I I 1 i UI uu/un »s) r-H-o o o CO COO) ^ ^ ^ o> tjro o o CD ID CO tn l/> CO ID O I I I I I I I I t I « • CD CD ID 4k CJ C a I(a > U> ^ ^cj u)isn-isjwnu)H-»—ijiro*— CO >nn m wmzm c/) nom O CD ►H l-«zo C > -< f >; > Xm O ►H O > T>o CO -H CO —i m so O CD Owo > C X 7D m no O -o O CO -H >om Xo CD O ID o 4^ \ O ID \ ID ro a> o) 1^1 —•— cj4k iNjro to to cn c/i h-OOOK-C»H-r-U)»—0>—C7)ID CD k • k-4k 4^o o O O CD CniDCTJr-—4C7>H*0'*4-J4k(0 ID to LiJ to OO OO o o • 00 «••• •••• •••• cja>U3rooco -i o id ►- o n )CD CD cn LH OO OO o o u>rocDOCF)CJ>r-ocno>—cr»iD k- H»OO OO o o o o »m •m *T> O CO —< X> CO m no no O CO > Om X X X X X X 01)0000000 IDID ID ID ID 'D CD CO 'D O O O O O O O G O r> 4k X*. 4k COOOOOCOOOC00000 07 OOOOOOOOO 4k Xk ^ Xk o o o o o o o o o idididcoididididid IDIDCOIDIDIDIDIDID roro»^)rororororjN) ID 4k k-* 4kOcn»^coiDiDCjro OtD-4^ID(D 4kOO 4kO^JCJU>CJK-LPU1^J 'DT)T5"0‘TJnDTJ-OTI mmnrnrnmnmrn onooooooo cococococococooco XXXX X X X X X OOOOOOOOO5cno5o::D:DnD5DSD:D OOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOO T? O'DTJXX'DXX mmmmrnmmmm onooooooo xxxxxxxxx o O O O o OOOOOOOOO k-»k-»k-k-►—k-« k-• I—* k— k— k^ k-* 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 kk 4k 4k k-*4^^4k4k4k4k^^4kCJ o CJ k-*ro CO cocjcorororororo'oi CD OO cn CD ro rororocok-k-k-k-o O CO k-ro *—k-k- k-rjOOOOO 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 i 1 O ro K*o k-k-k-orOk-k-OOO o 4k ro o ro -jrocjXk-jroiDOO o ID CD o ID 4k(D(DIDPklDIDCDO 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O 4k to o CO tOCO»—4ktOCOk-k-0 o ro k-o tok-rorou)*——Jroo o o o o fS o b o f ^ d n 'D CC ‘O ^O <0 'O to ^ KO KO u"> OOOOOOOOOOO X^ Xk Xk 4k 4* Xk 4k 4k Xk 4k > -4 -J -J 4 -J ^ - J - 4 --J OOOOOOOOOOO 4k^Xab4klk4k4k4k4k4k4k OOOOOOOOOOO IDCOIOIDIDIDIDIDIOIDID (DIDIDCOCDIDIDIOIDiDID |_n k—LT> CT) ►— CO 4k -^aooofvJH-»-*tncjrv'^Oi^ roiD^—►-cnk-iocotncnoiO coCDCDCjtntnoooocjooooU) ►—IDlDCJ^Ooa)Cr»Or>00'kJtO C/M/)C/)</)t/>COCOCOt/)CO(/} >>>>>>>>>>> -ri-n'n”n*n*n"n-Ti-n-T|Ti onooooooooo >>>>>>>>>>> LO CO U> CO UJ U) C. LO lO CD CJ ^-4*400000000 I I I I I I !« I I I i rsjfsjrorororoMKMvjNjro I I I I t t I I I I I Lncncn*—oo iDCDXkOO—4»—^->-*H-a)CO OIDIDLn^LTCnk—►-IDCD I - I I I I I I » I I IT 4'(DCJCOCJCJCJCO>—h - cj.j^-cp'o N-cnro X k- ( )O CO ID X to O 1 n ^J 4k O C»l O kHz-4o-< Oo•yi O > 4k -1 O \m so O O ID zo ID ro > 4^ 4te c:- - z lO CO —4 k— I— o o f O CJ tn ijy TJ m so > no m so > u I N) <m zoo70 O m tn o so Tl •"4 K-l oz 0 > o 1 o K) O 0 c CJ z 1 o z o O 0 • 1 o o z < o X m o ZK so m CD r-i C/) iP o lO “V 4 C4 o •- zc > 555l5iiif>> ZZZZZZZZZZZccccccccccc 5 izc > zc > XXX xxxxxxxxx '!>>'> >>>>>>>>>z z z zzzzzzzzz C tx C GCGCCCCCC > > > >>>>>>>>> XXXXXXXXXXX X >>>>>>>>>>> > ZZZZZZZZZZZ r CGcecccceec c>>>>>>>>>>> > r~r-r~r~r~n'f~rr~r-‘r“ p“ Xm CD CD o m om r*’feI Vm K L., ^1 :i. .‘r /::> X X X X X •X X »— o o o o ()»r>o o CD 'D U3 o CD m CD CD X CD o o o o O M OO m fsj CD C7>CD Lf1 k/i »U c/1 n IS)»—•o CD oo •Oi <J)z O k-4 z -Ho-< oo“T1 o o o O O OO > Dk xw u -I o\'V.\m o o o o O oo o (C*u>(O CD CD CD CD z \%ooCOCDCDU3CD CD rj tsj N>ro M NJ ro K)1 — o »>-* ^ Xlk K>ro oo ►— U) ro Xfc C75 LP cn LP LP Xk x^oo 06 to ^ 00 O fsj U) ►— oo OO ►- ►-CO CD CD CD to x^ tn Xk CD oo NJ o CD OO oo OO CD CD CO VO tn CD O)►— 00 LT» O CD OO 0)0)oo oo CD CD OOO 09 CD CD OCD oo N>N)oo oo X>k Xk oo o cn »»»■»m » OOOOO >>>>> -HC c •^zz zoa o “T| o I . > c:z u n X (/) CD -H z >o >>> >o -n -Ti Ti -n -n 50 -<X r--<-▼1 -n —<CCCCC fsi X m Nl mm >z z z zz >TI >< r“oaoaa c —<CD 09 m >m >mm z *-4 fSJ O >zz o Xk u» ^0 C-P>—o OodC O 3)-~4 -4 O r-</)C>D m m >r*»-4 >>r-C-H Z 50 X -H >o m m mm m m m X r“C/1 'V.mm X 33 33 33 r~m C/1 -4 O >-4 ►-<>coco a OOO r”O ♦-I X mm m C D m m z z 10 3omm m O o o o mm o C/)30 33 C X c O 50 m> >• #X r*»-• —< -H O o 33 m "Oo-4 •H mzz ~4 —4moo O 50 z> m m O O fs3 O 'O OO ►—►—i/I Xk ►— ►—o 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 o Xk Xk Xk Xk Xk ►-o LJ CD CO to CO COO c CO 00 1.1 CO O t.P z tij CO €7)CO C7) o —1 »1 1 1 1 i 1 ^o Xk ►—LP rs) o z Xk Xk oo IS)CD CD o o CD (D o CD O CD o • 1 1 1 1 1 1 • X3k Xk o CO CD -40 IS)fS)o CO IS) o z < j:m t/7 O Xmo ?0m o c/> 0 CJ 1 LJ I o fsl “U > •X 2:2 X X 9 X 2 CO O•J>>>>>m > >>m »z z Z z z »z z o 1 c c:c c c c c m o >x>>>>n > /> r*f~r~r~r~r~r“ cn C/)PO •u } ■ c Ik'■ j'V‘h i' •T OO o 00 uy D O X. K) <D K) OO 00 OO OO 'XX^ hJN) CO CD ^o rv> CJ»— ^ * « • ^ CO OO ^cn ro OOOOOOOOOOCOOOOOOOOOOOOOC»OOa)OOOOC»5 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO -o ' -J -i 'O 'O ' J *0 'O ^ '‘j ' i OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Kjrs)N>rOK)KJ»MNjroMNJfOIS)rON)rON)N) fs)N)N)NJforororoK)NjN>fofSJN>rorororso CD CO CO UD CO CD CD CO CO (C CO CD CO (O CO CD CO ro •- OK) CJ Ot^^o^—cDU)U)CJXte»— ►—CiJ»— «^oooooO)»—>-*>—o>^-cncnc/iw^is)^cDO 0)io^K)>—oocjooocna)ooLncnLnc»c/i'X»—‘O aiO<oo«oooovnK)K)>— ui*^totn<-oc*JO '^►-CDOt-JOOOOCDUDCJOi-nooOCnCDO »—» »1—* • »— »— >—• •►-« k ► - •►— K— 00 OO CO 00 CO CO »C*3 »CO *CC OO o oooo o •CD •O O X X X 'J X ' J ■CO »» • •o o O O O O O O X •X-- •cn cn o o o o o o Xk ^ ^ Xk x:b rs; rs> isj fsj K) CD CO CO CD (O CO r j r j rj N> K) N) OO N) K) *— O h- CD CO X CD ►- OO CD •— C-J ^ ^ C^ LJ C7) C7> X N) OO O) X OO CD Lf» O CD CD Xk O K) O Xk Xk CJ CJ Xk Xk Xk U Xk Xk ro ro OO OO O O O O Xk Xk Xk Xk X \X. *x ro ro ro ro ►—»— »—* *x X X. x. CD CD CD CD ^J »sj ro C7> ro Xk CJ r>j »— ID CJ cn (*J CD CJ X CD o X mr> zO o > > 3:ocz ID CD f J o o “▼1 O 70 O m IV U- -i <r ;#i W: myW...w J GDc:oom -H -D 70 »X Z H •-4 zo >z-o </> r. V i- COO 7070 •HkH COOOGDGOCD09GDOOOOOOCOCDCDCOCDGOCDOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO XX >> cc (/)00 I I >> OO zz ►-4 C-* mm >> OO mm O xIO for- 1 1 1 Ik Xk Xk fO CJ CJ OO 00 o •— >-• 1 1 1 c-cnro • . -t • Si ?>r fO Xk ^ CD(0 1 1 1 i ' ■CJ CD Xk ■►—^ ro i »p S,'.:»p iv-';.»m 1 o 1oto'' C/) 7C CD -------- «------ mmmmmrnrnmmmrnrnrnmrDmmm </>OOC/)C/>C/)C/)C/H/)</)COC/)OOC/)C/>(/)C/>t/)C/> y070707070y070:0707070707Q7070y0707Q 888888888888888888 7070707070707070707070707070X^70^0 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO </)C/)C/)</)v#</)C/)C/)C/)(/)COOOC/)OOCOC/)COV) mmmmmrnmmrnmmrnmmrnmmm m m m m m m m rnrnrnmmmmmmmm </)C/>«/)(/)(/)tOCO(/)</)(/>(/)t/)COCOl/>COCO(/)^zzzzzzzz >*Zf -^xocommjtmo >r-3U02-t>x20Zm mC'TjOmmmo Z-4C»-42:ZZOr-:» O50X-«OOOZmOOOOZO>O2 I “D -< -4"OC-,CI 50> O n-12 oooo^ r->z*“0oo c/)QOXOOOC<Zr"T) omo» i>Cc>ZZZ30rHmm-ooo<D2Z2m >-m(/)f-</)</)c/) mx-<r “t:»-7) » cd -i H-3omr-ccc:ZCO »-^3o cmc:> 4t r"r*r*> x to n cor“mr”*x mi-ccjso—. ►-mXCD —12 ►Hz O tjOZ mXk> I I m 2t/)»x *n“nm»x»Oc/)mor “m >"DZH-<mmmx C-hodo m mi r* (/)zcca)CDO>X o cd m^oc/) I -H I T)0 m *T3 m—«o tl >> m-<o?o 30-H rom m O) xxxrorsjfsjrororoKJfsJOOOOOOO CJK)K)cncnc^CDX^#kCJCJH-k-H-»—^-»—^— I I I I I I I I I f I I I I I I I I CnCJCJCJCDCJCDCDCJCJCJLOCJCDCJCJCJCD CJOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ►—CDCDCnCnCDCDCDLnCDLncDCnLTUDCDCnX^ I I I I I I I I I I I I I r f f I I CDXkXk^^^^Xk^c^cJoorororvjr\jr\jro a>CJCDo>aooooorof\Jc.nv.nxkXk^^XkOO t0CX)XGr)OOOxlXkV/^XkO<DCX>CD(0OO I f I I I I I I « I I I I I I I I I CDOOOOOOOOOCOOXXkXk^Xk^Xk hjCDCDOOOOOOOO*—KjrorvK)^—►— CD 00 CD CD CD d?>k •w > tk OOO"ww c:r-r- r* >>>>>>O r-m r* xxxxxx X m OO t/5 X OO 00 X X <m ZZZZZ2 >> >Z Z !95 X X o e* pk 1?. J?.o o 05 m X -r» >>>>>>X f—X X O 00 CO GO OO (/) CO r~m OO X CO 00 (/) U) U> CO m O OO OO m 888888 t o X ;d o ►H *—1 m IX *-i I X r* r- >>>>>>m O -n m 30 X X X X X X m m rn m m m m m o n o OO 00 00 00 CO 00 OO X t5 o *u o o r-i 00 X XO X C X CI *-< i-i X >m m r-X OO X CD X X X 2 TJ m o m X XXX a >oo<Zc c: >s:X m x:>:xxx X 3D C/5 o 00 >oo> >f-O m mr* r- r- ^-X r-</> xr“00^-^-m D O •T5 O • O </)X 3D m O "H X m X m -n(/)O)“D m ID m 05 m pk X CD m X mcD mo rj O m m z z CD 0300 r“ X K) r j K) ro ro K)X C'X X > cn cn cn CJ' cn CO 4k X 4k 4k o 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 o ^ 4k ^ ^ <k ^4k 4k 4k 4k o CJ CJ CJ CJ CJ OJ OO ro OO OO c CD CD O O O O O CJ OO z CD CD CD C7> CT CD rj u>X X X 1 1 1 1 1 •1 1 1 1 ^ 4k ^ 4k 4k 4k cn ro cn on z OO CO 00 OO OO OO CD 4k CD CD o 4k O 4kOOO X CD X X 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 t 1 OOOOOO CD 4k CD CD 1—4 OOOOOO 4k ro 4k 4k z »o T ID o :t C>0 o T c/> z m CO CD > o m m 99 0 Xk ♦ ro X 1 CD fsj T3 >o m r' Vi/ '.'r. OO 00 00 Oll/ILP (0(0 (D hj roro oo or oo ►-»—»— to CT/ ^ to to to (O to to rvjN)fs> ►- oo or* O to KJ CO *— .J OO O to hj ► •* oo ►— cn o O to fsj I CO »-* tn O O ts) tL> KJ r- cjO ►— oo O Xh. to 1^— c». fO ► — ro fo o o x» t i o o to ► -» »— C30 ► - •“ J O to f J o X m O :r. zo O > ¥ • to to ro O -H -< o o :x) Ozo ft Ift ■ CDCDCO 0> 0> O) ^ ^ I 0> O) to N) cn »— r>j to o ui oo O O 00 too O t-J roro LHl/l OO to U) ►— *—►— H—ro isj X* ^»— 1—CO CJ Xk x»tn tn x^to CO cn Xik 4^4^ Xh Xk IS4 K>►— ♦—tn tn cr tr ►-OO OO oo o o tntn u> tn OO ►- o ^o o O) cn oo OO OO OO CD (7)tn »»»»»•»» > c f?-.' i’. ■’ ;■■■ ■ ri--' fl,fe:I- <■ ir ooommm XXX OOO ::o;o90 OOOcototo OOO C-f MCi OOO XXXzzz -n -n'Ti rn n fti rn rn 'SOIO^ 1-4 i-m-4 OOO (/>C/)C0 OOOzzz m > (/) t/> H-l O m COm < m >o m O O 50 > Ocz to o O 50 13 50 m o > -< 50 »—I CD c zo oo -n-n-Ti *o-n(/>CO CD »-4 »-4 ^-4 Omc m 5>m r-rr-tom-o m •-H mzsx-4 Tl 5Q z 50 >r*—4 QQO o 1—1 f^ftl fT^m m o <<<in -4 f-'D'TI •vTX 50 -4-4 in O o on o o c:50 oo o o r--<T7 T)r~z r*to -c -<o z —t z m < o m OO ►-4 r*m >m c: cz >r“z z n T) TJ r--<oo o TJ -O r-»—4 50 KH 50 50 »—4 z (/>■n o -4 t—4 ^m c z z to oo »—4 •H z ;o n to c/3 o-n —4z m 50 ton 50 > •O m 50 o C X T3 50 5T :x) -4 m o ZZ -4 m > 50 CD 8 n O -< ►-H to 50 m ■o > to to 1-41 -I r»i O m too 50 ¥-4 ■o -I ♦-4 O o X mo 50 m O k-i CO -4m 50 f;V I' y OOO OOO •*4 o *4 o ►-OO o -4 > O►—X^►—Xk ♦—4^►— ►—CO 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 o Xk ^ ^4^x^x^Xk 4^Xfc ►—4^Xh o fororo to txnj oo u>oo to tn roN>►—to cz »^>o »—»—•Xk ¥-x^tn ►- cn tn x»(Z OOO o tn K)tn to o o»-ro Xte —4 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 •1 1 1 1 IS3ISJK)OOO tn tn o cn »-o I-*tn z tn tn tn CO vO CO to ro o ro cn o to CO CO CO CO CO tn ♦—CO to COO to to 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f Xki^Xk ►— 1— 1—•to to to ►—O too to to >“4 NjrON)Xk Xh ^Xh Xh O •-0 *—•N> < '3 ■.• 0 x» t rsj 1 iO N) » » » Io X (/# » » V I o in ■ » I o ZK in Xm in •»•m ••to ■>•9 *a »> »■»9 »a •o 1 ,1 1 1 1 1 1 m O o o O o O o 5T 5^.pc X X X X to to t^to to t''00 "O >o m oo OJ » » » » » » O <o K> ‘-V '■# A t»: t(,;- c« O X too CD ?Q >o m -< k'm »■' I & oo 00 u> u> '-4 OO OO U) o oo K- oo r 4 u> oo ^J o> to CO rj <*0 4:» OO o o o o N)M to (O ro fsj (D r%j (£> hj 03 hj CO fSJ C-.C4 H-ll-l XX Xm X > XX >> oo XX o -H < ►H z CO 00 >> r-r- mm coco oo OO (/) Xm 30 ►H m m O O 30 o -H X -< X > (/> m iz X > TJ “D -< C/) O > 30 o *X3 o > -H o o ■D O X -o ro » I CO o o 4^ CD 152Xfc CJ H- tn r- CO Dktnoo fs) rj OO O) cn X^ Xk ►— »—- ►- h— 'O '-O ♦— ►-* CO X^ CD oo CJ ro ►- cn CP r- r- »— H- C7) C7) O) 03 'O -»o OO CP CP CP cr O O X >o X o X m O > n o O co<30 X X O *T| o cm m 1-4 X f“ z X to “D r*“r-I—<Om•n-H >m m X c mto »-4 >>to 30 ►H 3D o O »-i m m m o C/)m o oo o O o H*►—►—►-ro f t 1 1 1 1 1 1 XkXh Xk Xik X^ to roro CO CO to oo ro CP tors)Xk oo oo o to O)ro*-ro »—►—ro Xik f 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 H*isir-H*O o CP CP ro x^ro ro X^CO CD x^ CD CD CD CD o CD w-«CD 1 1 »1 k 1 1 1 to X^ tJ to *—»—•CD CD ►-rj ►—r—u>rj X^1 — m m »»>B ■ m •»»9 B » m m »»•m » 1 1 1 1 •1 1 O o o o o o n X 3T 3»:X to in to to to to t*' » . »>•> »»• K- ^ ^ c»' CKt c*‘ <■»' fv .'.o rc on ro CO f^j f J r j • . f • • 3 ‘ J -4 •* J '>4 ' ^ -4 ^ J-4-J cT * n v/* v.n c/i *j^ cr cn OOOOOOOOOOOO oN>hofo^3fs)N)»vJN)N)roro CO(D(D(D(D(D(OCDCDCO<0(0 fo rsj ^ 4 ^o rs) ro rg ro ro ro ro ro ►—rororocncrtn^-*—►-rorjro ^v/»cnLnooou>tou)C7>cy)a) ho roroooccriLnLn f^OOOOOO'O'O^Lntncn c5oOOOOOOCT>a'CTkrororo I II I » CT) CT^ CT) CT) (O 3030:TJ:0303B3D30::D3D303Q OOOOOOOOOOOO -D-0*D*T3*T3^T)*D'0^'T3-0 m m m m m m m m m m m m »—<»—l»—4KH ZZZZZZ2Z22ZZ OOOOOOOOOOOO c/3(/JC/)coc/)cit/)CO(/)c/)oocn -0>0*-4000DOOOOO I I 1 I I t I I I t I I Lnc/itncncnLnoitncntnLnuri I I I I I I I I I I 1 I tnc/itnrororo I— I— <Oa3<£>4:fc|3fc^>fc“^*^^N)rONJ OOOtOCDCD.tfcX^ u to iOiO 11111111*111 CO<DC£i^X^i^(OtJtJU)COCO Lococorororotococo^»-*#-» O 3T iT 1 — ^►-* ►— V— ►—n CD ort on cx>X CD » : r j r j m r j O CIz -1 o -< Oo‘Tt OOO > ^ ^ x^—1 om30 ro ro ro o »—*—*—zc (D CD CO rofsi N) tn CD o> oj ->*4 ►- I—* ►-• ld *—• H— ►—• m m m 30 3D 30 3D 3D 30 OOO (/)(/)(/) OOO ooo I I I CO CO CO cn cn CP CD €7) O) ) I I IS) ro ro ^ ^ ^ CO CD CO I I I ISk fo isj ro > XOc:z <m zo O 30 m X o m in O 30 >oo ocz z o z < Xrn CD 4P >o m ... . ■ .. o Xm O X 30m o ►H to m 3D O X:^ I ro I CD ro -V > O m K-' fem: if. .' vi: « % f’:iv*i/ !■k ’‘ifI, It’ %s} >h O’k I''' t' t: ) ^ri;. '. - . T-rV •' • ' I, :r’,■ 00 01 O N> N> (£> IS> •n O 30mo 30 CO -< CO 3Dm T> >• O m CO o X 0 IS> 01 » » » » » oo (D OO oo oo oo ^ ^ (£) CD (O ooo oo CO o CO ' i oo Xa J o »—• ►-•- ►— CO Of* O'.* oo X. o. C^> CD C7) ^ '-J CO t* CO x» tu c/1 oo CJ tX3 LT K) H* O o o X3k o o o o X^ ^ i* Xk o Xk o Xh o Xk ro r J f J ro ro <D rsj (0(0(0 fsj rofo CD NJ •O ^J cr rj (£>(0(0(0 hj ^J f\) rg (O »“ j (O K) (O ro 0)05 H—1/4 c/1 CJ OK> CJ CO CO fsJN)l—CO(JlH-^-f ►— o CDCJ 05 t/1^- CD o o to to ►— ►-Xk CO O CO CJ fs rO c/1 o oicn cnro cx> Xh Xk x»►— H-CO CO LO h- rsj o O CD O)CO oo wO oo N> o • • OO rocj cn CO OO c/1 LP X* coO oo oo *—• ♦—•»— ►—(D CD oo o OO isj CJ) cn H-oo oo OO CO •— fO o O oo oo CO CJ t/1 c/1 »»»»»»»» 2m Om mmm OOO Q Cm CO ::D O > 30 (/.(/>(/> OOOooo m > CO T) X > C > (/) 30m -o > »-i 30 ccc ►H H-O-4 r- r- r* 1. *—(z X > X > XXX > 30 m 30 h-4 no m m CO CO CO -n m m X ►-H X X -i o 4O(/)C0C0 30 O X > c: > T3 X» 30 ►H CO m 30 < 30m -D > ►H 3D Om o o o -J o ►-toro*-►—CJ ►— 1 t f 1 1 1 1 1 Xik x^Xik Xk ►—Xfc Ul Co uxoco ro N)CJ oo x^K) ro N)CJ oo cn o ^J ^x^x^CJ PJ o> 1 i 1 1 »f »1 H*ro c/1 c/1 o NI o o NI x^OXk CD x*>o CO (O CD <0(0 to ip o to 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 (>>x»<0 (D *“•x^o •— ►—NI ro*-fO o N) ooo o fill (jM-n cn c/i fill K> O xs -j ro C7> CO Xh ID CO i I I I Xk UJ C-J ►— hj to *— un > Xk N) CU ro f c/i (D 0 1 (O UJ XJ CD (D I O oo I Xk Xk o o rs) CO I CJ m •a a D M m •a a t a m »•a a f 1 1 1 1 1 o o o o n o yi PC PC -r p: CD CD CO (D in cn :> 3C {/) I o PC CO I o PC CO D P o X m O zo o > > Xoc:z X xxxx r“p m m rn m rn O O o -H ooac z o m 3D CD *-H X o oooo CD z < r"m m >30 30 30 3D >1 Z z 30 o m XXXX m CD o >mm m m C CD 30 >>>>-H ►H —< X f— f— r~ r*•—(•H > o 30 m Z X XXXX m o —<CJ > oooo CO o 30 >>>>>m o o (/>30 30 30 30 30 CO m m m m < m X om (/> O 30 ►-( "D H-(o >ooocz *-lz < Xm CO > o m to (D ^} O ►H o -n O 30ozo n Xm O P«: 30 m O 00 m 30 o Xk K) I (D IS) TJ L) m h % p:I Ir i- CO O) o to fO oo en iO 00 O CD N> oo cn CD O CO IS) 05 oo IS) o CO IS) oc 05 LH C/1 a> o) fo r J -DO rofs) »— IS) to CO fS)lS) ► -• 05 en <o o CO IS) »— ► - Cl oc oo ..n 05 a> ij) ISJK) IS) COCO CD r j IS) » -^ • ►- CO 05 oo oo C15 V.'' • '* C^ ' l-J C..' '. . ' u i» i» o o o a c.-> u \ \ rs) N) hJ NJ i^ v CD CD to to CD fvj ^o ro r j ro CO ' i O CD CO LP r.» O to N) O X rn r> A d; O o > CO CD ^.1 o*r» O:o Ozo ? J.: f i-'. ^ Dk ►—CPLH U)^ rj ^J 4k i» U)K- »—•LJ IS)!-► H-00 oo lh lh -DCDIS)OO o oo o rjCDO^^ci5»—4k £k (D CD o KJ IS)IS) IS)->J ^ CJ O O ooo o ro CD 4k c/* oo CD CD CD CD o CO OO oo oo 05 o o ooo o 4k o tD O tn oo OO CO ^o rsJ O CD oo OO fs) rs)LT» IS)oo ooo o t. oo CD O tA 4k (41 CD O O o )»)»11 »»»»■»• > Xocz •H » m » n » m m » I O </> •—M 00 OO •sJ'vJ K>IS) »9D OO :»:o OO C/)C/>OO T|T| >>cc u K)K} 0(/) 88 -<-< OO O OO ^nI IS> OO r * c U) ►—»l»► -m »►— ►— »—•m #► -•«►—»►- »-* OO •CC CO »CO »OO »OO OO cn »cn cn »CD ■CD »CDO) »O) CD «CD •h-«f-* on »CO to »in «cn m u) to OO O O O t ■L 4^•-»t.' **» K>PO ISJ N>ro S J *; ►- ►-1 —— \ CD CD CD CO CD '• fON)fO N>N>fs) o r .:> iO i£> fsj %? CO tn ^ 4k CD CD 1 — ^ m CD c/icn »ntn OO OO OO Xkk^rs>4k ^•—k-ro Ki »n COU)OO OO K) K)4:^U>CD 4k rofs) • 4k 4^ • # • CD CD * • on on • • OO OO OO cn o on CD CD CD CD CD CD CDO on on OOOO OO OO OO OO CD f\J Di OO bJ C a> CO 1 »»»»»»»»9 » » » » I O o ?pm ►Ho m C/l 30 m > I i/> O X m c "Om o ►H moo 0 1o 2. (/) m 3C > (/> C/) c: ?oozo »-l m o o O Q Ti -n to o 90 90 m O >>c:mm X -4 00 r-f 13 30 -0*0 c -n m O XX "O 30 r-r“c 3D CO 00 *-c OO ►1 >30 SO >>—i Z mm m CO o >m <<00 X >> m r-X f-r* -HHCOODHO OO » » I o c/> » » » t o 4^ If » » I O 4/> * » « t O iA 9 » » I o w'> » » » I f”) 00 » » ♦ O 7^ 00 » » m Io OO o Xm O X O O OO > 4k 4k^-Hm N>N3 rs4lS3 H*►—k-w CD CD CD CD ro Nl rorsj > 8 C 00 30 30 30 30 "U -o-o o o k-4 ♦—1 ►H m mm X r--C -H O 30 Z90 C r*isiDg y:30 90 90 >i-«cn -<-<-<< >z OO </)(/) cn m 07 uo >>(A z XX c <■H H o HH o mm -o m 90 90 o z kH 30 30 m z c c 30 o m >>90 -1 OO <c zx o >90 o • m m 90 90 c:(A mm -o “D k-4 >>z IMMo90 90 m X omc/>o •-I “D o OO o o -k4 D O OO "kj OO k-ro k^k-k-CO o 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 o Jk 4k 4k fo 4k 4k k-4k 4k 4k 4k <4k 4k o CDC a>ro ro 40 OO ro ro kwrro ro (O coco c OO CO ro to o k-CD »-i*k-CO ^ 4k z OO ro fO o O o OO ro ro k^ H*-4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 IS) to o in n o c »—k-*cn cn k- k*Z CD CO ro o 4k D CO O vjro CD o>foro o ID CD CO o CD f—CD O 4k CD o CD CD CD • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 »1 1 1 1 1 1 CO o CD CD k-o coco CD CD COCO k4 fS3N3 >-*o ro o COk-CO ro H* k-z < Xm 00 (/> > Om lO to N) O•n O 30 O m O 90mo 4/> O I K) I CO NJ -o >orn -1 I •, ■>•;••• .1.4.-. P% ■ 1 •> V f-- ; ■Bm: 0^!'-. ; ■ ‘1' •■>- > \ j'T'.v -n- 9m 0m' KffW,'' '* ■«‘ u- ^1; Vt/;- r--- ' *» i#w . ,^- • k- m. W^‘ii fe^Of- r<-.\ •Hi'^'-‘,r *' f'B' i#P:. >Vv- • k ** - ‘V m S'? - * f-, • V. * ► 'B'M:- 5 .'■i,AW. ' :.|rP I*;'- o'-,- r » K ■ ^tr 4' ’ ”'.i iKI^' isa 4a\ V' :«!K’'*Sisia.: ■■ 09<D O in ooiO O oo(D O CJ 00<o o fSJ oo(O o COCO KT O »»» » » OOCO cn 00oo i* DOOO K3 OO 00 00 OO 0000 oo oo 00 00 LTI LP t/> tn lh oo <D C7) oo o> in in oo « • ooin oo 90 M 90m in ■H H Sm •Hin s -*4 in 8 O • Im M I fs> I fO cne» CIO) rofs9 09 00 OO oooo oooo in C C39 c c C Comomm>> o M >cn o <-< H o -4 M M H z z >> •H 90 "O >-4 -4 Q in z c z >>s o CD 1 m r'cn CD O 90 c»h4 -4 >M >z in m -<-4 M m o z •D -<o >m 1-4 z O X in <z m >omcfoz90-n 90 90 -omZ c i/i Z > H inz ccccc 001*7 (/> in CO mmmmm 00 00 (/></) 00 ooooo ►-I o 9Dz 4/) X O 3T -om o i~< 00 l-iz H4 no m O X M ino om ininrn in I c: z m > Qm o > 90 000-4-1>>>mm in•omo cn X o -I 9D >>>mm ’n-D C > 90 90 9QOO 888** M"n O 90 Zin CDm m Mn :jcm Hin rn 9D OO oo -4 -4 on cn o o o O o o o O O ooooo O o oc o»^ ^ ^ ik u ■N,V,V* ro IS9 IS9 ISJ K9 K>ro ro ro ro ro N3 NJ N>ro ro vors> »->►-1 —•—►-►-►-►-►—^ ►- •s*\V,V.\ CD ID ID CD (D CD t£>CO (O CO CO CD (D CO CD CD CD CD fs>M ISJ rs>ro ro ro ro ro rororo roN)fS)ro N) ro coco CJtO ro H*mm *orom 0)0>CO CJ coco mm mcororo^mm ^ ►—ooo oo ►- ►—h- ►--o ^roro OC0N>^009 mm oo mom oo OO <7) O)mm 0)07 ^ro^#h^co O) c>o o OOO oo OO roro OO »— ►-*c> ro rsj ►- 00 cj m cr oo ooo m »»»»»»J»» ii e*i> oooo 9D9D -oti 9Q3Q OOr-r-mm oXm O o > > Ec <m oo 90 m X om ino »-i -V O O O O O o o *o ^^ooo o OO > r-ro •—•r-•—k-ISO CjrOk-r-r-►-k- •—O 1 •1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 o Pk lb Jb pk Pk Pk o ISI CO CO CO ro CO CO CO CO CO CO coco ro oo coco c: ro in cn p»00 in mmmrjrj ro ►«•z o on ro CD o r-r-CD mmmoo H*m roro -4 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t •—in r-»►—r-►-in mmoror-l-»m r-O z to o fs>ro ro ro Pk O)ik9)^ro ro CD rocD o CP CD CD CD CD Ok CD CD CO CD CD ID CD CD H»CD CO • 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 » 1 CO CD CO CO CJ CJ CJ CD CD ^ CO CJ CD COr-»•-4 ►-ro r-r-►—CJ ►-►—N'. •mror-►—z < zmtn lO (O f J O o-n O TO Oz O n» O 5^ 90mo 1-4in m o "D o Iro •4 I CO fs> •D > •»»»»»cn o m »s »V o >m o »o »»»o 1 1 1 1 1 1 mooOooO z 31 3; CO cn cn CO cn CO ■•V. - COUNCIL MEEHNG APR 2 7 1992 r'n^mr(!»ftn!vio N^r.", ti-iiV;v i •_ I* - .K... ^V:fv ^ «S. x: t?- m vg'vlgW'- .’w :is (i'S;i ' »■., . -— ' > i, -i -A! •* i S! I --,• .< kimMm.: y-; f 'tjkamA PfJBLIPATinM nr 'Tvrr f wy r\A ISSI 1 I I LAKEWIDE NEWSLETTER! This is the first of two annual newsletters that go to all lakeshore owners. We do this mailing twice a year to keep the entire lakeshore informed about the LMLOA’s activities and to solicit your support and membership. A lot was accomplished in 1991, and our aspirations for this year require your financial participation and any personal involvement you can offer. Enclosed is a membership form to make joining the LMLOA easy! EARTH DAY LMLOA STYLE by Kabty Pyaa EARTH DAY & ^ The FOCUS of the Third Annual Earth Day Festival is educadonal—for all ages. The primary emphasis is on community pride in the environment. Mark your calendar now for Wednesday, April 22, 1992, 3:00*9:00 p.m., at the Lafayette Club. You won’t want to miss this grand event. There will be something for everyone’s interest. earth Day continued on Page 3 EXOTIC LEGISLATION UPDATE by Neil Castagna, Environmental Director, MSO <£ LMLOA The Milfoil-Mussel bill has passed both House and Senate environmental committees. Appropriations and joint conference committees are next and the outlook for a better and more defined exotics law looks good. The bill was staned in October, 1991 based on a resolution by the Minnesota Lake Management Federation (MLMF) that set up a steering committee of diverse state interest groups to explore the issues of containment of exotics in the state and the best way to accomplish it. Under the direction of Co-Chairs Stan Borman. Cedar Lake, and Brad Walker, Leech Lake, the group included the Freshwater Foundation, DNR, Sea Grant, Ten Lake Associations, LMCD, Minnesota Shoreland Owners (MSO), Focus 10,000, LMLOA, Hennepin Parks and the Minnesota Sportsfishing Congress. After putting together a strong outline, MLMF and MSO wrote the bill in conjunction so theirs woula be one strong voice. MSO Lobbyist Doug Hwald obtained he support of a distinguished group from the House of Represe'^tatives: Skoglund, Munger, Battaglia, Kinkel and Swenson and from the 5'nate: Luther, Morse and Minnetonka area Senators Gen Olsen and Judy Traub. A strong coalition was formed to make the bill fair to all major interest groups in the state. This group consisted of the DNR, Fishing Groups and lake associations represented by MLMF and MSO. After many meetings a fair and manageable bill was drafted. Exotics continued on Page 5 STATE OF THE LAKE b\ Don Germanson, President r. 1- rr;V ' L, Keep the chatter up! We just stumbled onto a 1988 Metropolitan Council document that had a public access budgeted on Lake Minnetonka in 1991. Why were we all surprised last October when the DNR announced their Maxwell Bay public access efforts? Somebody knew this was a budgeted item. We are not talking enough. Time and time again, lakeshore owners are fined and penalized for placing sand on the shoreline in front of their home, not knowing that there is an approval process to go through with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Why? Who should be publicizing this process? We are not talking enough. I - -f ■' H 0 • * I ‘ / j • ♦ # If I • * • * * » - 1 - •^ ^ at* r\ V V- •;v If-'? From L-F, Fred Badiyan, Kadty Fymt, Dorn Cermanson, Miles Canning. Jennifer Dotzenroth Back L-R, Jane Best-Regnier, Bev Btomberg, Galen Coiz, Neil Castagna, Chris Lindstrom ■> LMLOA BOARD MEETINGS... The LMLOA Board meets the first Monday of each month. Meetings are held at 7H)0 p.m. and are open to all members. Call LeeAnn SawM at 472*7221 for meeting locations. Now that the ice is on the way out, many lakeshore owners are placing bubblers around their frozen-in docks. Again, there is a permit required with the I-ake Minnetonka Conservation District. Who should be publicizing this? We are not talking enough. Is it the job of the LMLOA to act as a watch-dog and publicize the actions of all these agencies? Since nobody else is doinf it seems that we need to! When you join the LMLOA, you receive a 20-page information booklet highlighting the phone numbers and addresses of all these agencies so you will know who to contact. Keep the chatter up! 1992 LMLOA Staff OFFICERS Don Germanson, President 474-9226 Kathy Pyatt, Vice President 472-1505 Marcia Michalik. Treasurer 474-7962 Bev Btomberg, Secretary 471-7556 DIRECTORS Chris Lindstrom, Newsletter 474-4382 OPEN. Clean Up OPEN, Administration Neil Castagna, Environment 471-80'’ Miles Canning, Membership 470-90. Fred Badiyan, Milfoil 474-47V; Jennifer Dotzenroth, Social 471-3122 LeAnn Sanna, Public Relations 472-7221 Galen Golz, Lower Lake 473-5*»32 OPEN, Upper Lake Jane Best-Regnier, Northern Tier 472-3877 OPEN, Businesses COMMITTEE COORDINATORS Alain Frecon, Legal 471-0100 Tom Pokonosky, Tax 474-4365 Newell Weed, Tax-475-1882 ¥ I'. !i'C ■ ON THE LAKE it a publication o* the Lake Minnetonka Lakeshore Owners Association, paid for by its members and mailed to them in February, July ^nd September. April and November issues go to all lakeshore owners. Deadline for articles is Ute 5th of the month preceding the month of issue. Inquiries can be directed tu Chris Lindstrom, Editor: LMLOA. P.O. Box 596, Excelsior, MN 55331-0596, phone 474-4382. V'-. i-''- w A ’‘A.;11^'. M >.* - [S'- I.?' ..^ ISTTiv W^-0- ife:.-- i©-: ■ fis«ten Ip ,|.-in P ■titli Day continued from Page 1 Relax in the President ’s Room and hear the latest scientific data about local groundwater quality, aquatic exotics and toxin-eliminating organisms. Hear about the future health of Lake Minnetonka and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Presentations include what you and your community can do to protect the environment. These topics and many more are presented by a knowl^geable sdection of highly sought-after speakers (see box). Booths displaying environmentally friendly products for your home and family will provide an opportunity to learn about safe products and how, over the long run, they save your money and health. Receive a free tree for your yard, get some great advice on iandsc^[ring for wildlife or order a native tree from the Boy Scouts ’ booth. Find out what community service organizations, such as the Chamber of Commerce, Rotary, Lions Club and mcHne are all about and what they are doing now to save the environment. Representatives from these organizations will be available to answer questions. Shake hands with your State political leaders who are available to address the environmental issues that most interest you. Children will enjoy the special "Kid’s Korner" with environmental games and projects. Como Zoo will be on hand to share their favorite petting animals. The Raptor Center will explain their work and display some of their birds. The beautiful setting of the Lafayette Club is a delightful location for this spring event. A delicious Spring Buffet will be served for a nominal fee on the front porch overlooking the lake. Make this a special outing with your family or friends. This Earth Day celebration will be the kick-off for the 14 Lake Minnetonka cities’ Spring of ’92 Clean up programs. Some cities have designed their clean-up project and are expecting overwhelming participation. If you would like to be involved contact your city council for details about their plan or organize your own neighborhood spring clean-up. We welcome your participation in creating a display booth which demonstrates your environmental concerns, products or program. Call Kathy Pyatt, 472-1505 for more details. There will be media coverage to inform the public along with an ongoing cable Every Day is Earth Day serie.<: throughout the summer and fall. This LMLOA project is free open to the public. P pate: kr Ipv 'ilu V' ■■ - o' . A-■ • .''.V ' -• :^Y‘. a-';.'--• ■ -v.V.' 3:00 SiwraChib I a:?. "Earth Day Is Every Day” Speakers & Topics of Earth Day Festival Dr. David F. Junker Dr. Richard Hansen ii«a)ai3iijwiaa» looit. Morg» iaaii:ttbn*«yihcy Thomas Casey :B;00 BMN Sea Grant Mike McLean^ Calvm Alexander Minnesota Groundwater vX_______ Airrmn n^rnimfTr Future Scenario for the Lake Minnetonka a Minnehaha Water Shed District Organisms Which Wilt Eliminate Toxins in the Environment Conserving Bio~DiversitY Think Globally, Act Locally—What You Can Do in Your Community to Help Protect The Environment ir. Science Writer Overview of CWAP Programs and Minnesota*s Environmental Changes Green Peace History and Roia in Environmental Protection « Great Lakes Exotics & Zebra Mussel Ongoing Research ’A. 4th of JULY:A NEW CONCEPTby Miles B. CanningA bigger and better day--and night-- celdJiation of our country ’s birthday is planned for Lake Minnetonka-fireworks from a barge on the water near Big Island! Pizza Hut, Norwest Bank and several other businesses have pledged thousands of dollars to sui^rt the fireworks which promises to be the t^t in 68 years of celebrations. The Excelsior Chamber of Commerce has LMLOA members to help out with the 4th of July activities tiii' jmmcr. The budget for the daily festivities is over $33,000 (costs have skyrocketed). The committee needs more money and businesses will contribute the bulk of this cost. We have committed to help publicize the event in our newsletter. We are also encottiaging individuals to send cash donations ($5-10-25+) to the Excelsior Chamber of' Commerce "4th of July" Committee {Note "LMLOA MEMBER" on the message part of your died: so we can gauge the effectiveness cf our publicity efforts.)^ I value this event because I remember wonderful, "awesome” displays of the past. Our kids can enjoy a safe, healthy community parQr. I knov/ we can all go for free, but I sent a contribution anyway. If we can help with individual contributions, the volunteers can focus their energies on a great show. If you want to help, send a check to: Excelsior Chamber of Conmierce, Bor 32, Excelsior, MN 55331 or cj//474-6461. m- PUBLIC ACCESS UPDATE... One of the important tasks for 1992 is the Public Access Task Force. Representatives from the LMLOA, each of the 14 cities, Hennepin County aiid Hennepin Parks, DNR, LMCD, and fishing organizations are working to establish good public access to Lake Minnetonka. The task forc^ met for the first time in mid-March and plans to work through the sununer. For fiiture updates, watch this newsletter, or contaa Bcv Blomberg at 471-7556. MEMBERSHIP UPDATEby Miles B. Canning Membership DirectorEverything the LMLOA does for you and all of the hours of volunteer work put in by your neighbors is supported by your $25 annual membership fee. This is a "family" fee. It comprises the organization ’s operating budget —but it represents much more. Together we lake residents have a strong voice. Together we have representation; alone we don ’t. We aim to recruit 2,(XK) individual members this year, and we want more than your $25: we want your voice. Complete the membership form enclosed in this newsletter. Send it with your check to LMLOA, PO Box 596, Elxcelsior 55331- 0596. Or, call your bay representative or any LMLOA member-ask why they joined. Recent membership survey results (unscientificl V Many residents think they're members, but they're not! You have to renew every year (calendar January 1 anniversary). Do it today! V Some people think if they don't own lakeshore, they can't be members. You can be a "booster” member ($25) if you reside in the 14 cities that surround Lake Minnetonka, and you re welcome. Do it today! V Some think plenty of people are already "watch-dogging" their interests. Political reality dictates influence by numbers and organizational strength; none of us is as strong as all of us; the least you can do is join. •- V Some think of the LMLOA as l "summer-time" organization. Weil, we are...and fall, winter and spring. Our 1992 Businesses Sponsorship Campaign recognizes we are an interdependent community 12 months a year. i\ ^51 mv-^mH:::mm‘Pfelifc:-,'^PI&'. iPiK: ■ »■ ,|S:'if: ii*- 'te:;fiSv;vv‘-'ltesp';\ gSi^ .rim ;p^-' V »• ■ • pl^. feiilifcf ::;Kp?::.'V^"-v feifvf"tew- pp- Bcotki continued from Page iThis bill has many hurdles to clear. If you want this important legislation become law, please call or write your state legislator that you support the Milfoil-Mussel bill. You will he4> insure an important first step in containment and possible eradication of exotics on Minnesota Lakes. : p the bill does: II* Calls for keeping all public acce<^es on .•Jvf'.v.-.'.-- .■'"l ■ ■ - ■ ■■ • ■Infest^ takes clean of milfoil:pp-' pp Calls for random inspections of public Ip /accesses on infested lakes and the . . . « : :' •■■• ■ '/ ;V''I' ■mr- P:P'- . v; B Mississippi and Duluth harbor for Zebra Mussels, minimum of 10,000 hours. Tbughar and more defined penalties for transportation :iP'- •• More money for research. iW-t: : '• More money for eradicating new infestations and to start more control ffl' over existing infestations. doesn't do: • or charge any access :::‘v;vV ^ :i->; r - .* • * * Vumki to these participants who gave time and energy beyond the call of duty. Carl Swanson, Pres. MLMF Stan Borman, Comm Co-Chair Don Oermanson, Pres. LMLOA Pat Wulff, Metro COLA Oinny Lee, Focus JO,000 Steve Moline, Jdm Parrish, MSO Bob DeVries, Frank Schneider, MSC Gary Larson, FAIR, Kevin Kietsch Jennifer Dotzenroth, Jane Cheisel, LMLOA Kathy Pyatt, Vice Pres. LMLOA Jay Randall, Tom Sax, DNR State Reps. Wes Skogiund & Steve Smith State Senators Gen Olson & Bill Luther Doug Ewald MSO St MLMF Lobbyist my wife, Vanessa Castagna .5 LOWER LAKE COORDINATIONby Galen ColzWhat a pleasure it is to be part of this dynamic organization! I was recently appointed as the Lower Lake Coordinator and I would like to introduce myself. I have resided between Libb’s Lake and Gray’s Bay since 1978 and have been involved witli the Power Squadron on Minnetonka since 1980. I believe in maintaining the beautiful environment we live in, safe usage of our lake area, aggressive long-range planning and decisive action regarding people’s rights and issues affecting lakeshore owners. As a member of the board of the LMLOA, one of my main objectives will be "organizational-effectiveness." I want to be able to bring each bay together so that we have more cohesiveness among our members. I hope to be able to do this by helping to sponsor bay meetings and activities that will help to improve life on the lower lake. Bay reps for are needed for: Excelsior, Lafayette, Northome, Robinson and Wayzata Bays. Please consider volunteering as a bay rep or perhaps a block captain. You can call me at 473-8899. I am proud to be a board member and look forward to serving you. Let’s have fun and build together! CROWD CONTROL STUDY The LMCD will conduct a study this summer to determine where lake users originate. The findings will be used to update existing data and to influence future management of the lake. You could be contacted via this survey. Lake Minnetonka Memories^June 16, 1992Take a few minutes to dig into your archives! We are extending a unique invitation to the Lake Minnetonka area residents and businesses to participate in the LMLOA’s celebration of "Lake Minnetonka Memories." Each of the 14 cities encompassing the lake have been invited to put on display their special memorabilia at the historic Old Log Theatre. Our theme Lake Minnetonka Memories^ has drawn interest from many local Old Timers and Historians. After a (l.:iightfiil dinner, stroll into the theatre and listen to this nostalgic group of individuals share their great recollections of special times spent on I^ake Minnetonka.The LMLOA Social Committee has been meeting weekly since mid-February planning this evening. Many hours of preparation and planning are sure to make Lake Minnetonka Memories a memorable experience itself. If you have ideas, time to donate, or your business or organization wants to participate in this non-commercial, non-political event, call Jennifer Dotzenroth, 471-8122 or Chuck Parten, 471-8772. Watch the local papers and area businesses for details. I'M:®lVHO; Lake Minnetonka Area Residents, Cities, Businesses lv. -r- ■■ WHATi and much more.. INHERE: The Old Log Theatre fpWHEN: Thesday, June 16. 1992 - 4;00-10;00 p.m. . * *,V ‘/’**v* • • -*• 7 Lake Minnetonka \rea residents with each other for an evening of fiin and friendship while reliving "Minnetonka Memories I Sponsored by the LMLOA MAYOR LEGISLATOR BREAKFAST The LMLOA Board of Directors met with local mayors and state legislators for breakfast at the Lafayette Club in March for die 1992 First Quarter Update. Items discussed were membership, state legislation on water exotics, lake access controversies. Earth Day (April 22) and "Lake Minnetonka Memories" (June 16). Participants expressed their gratitude for LMLOA’s involvement on issues affecting Lake Minnetonka, and for sharing the information. I T.- f '^V| . ■ / i; Don Germanson presenting to breai^ast attendees. P: • • r" LMLOA BAY REPRESENTATIVES The Bay Representatives have volunteered their time to ar'<;t in conducting bay meetings, distribute flyers and keep you informed! Brown's Bay Big (stand Carson/St Louis Cottagewood N Echo Bay Excelsior B: y Gray's Bay CidMn Bay Lafayette Bay Libbs Lalce Meadvi lle/Linwood Northome Robinson Bay St AR)ans Bay Smith Bay Wayzata Bay N Woodland Upper Lake Black/Seton Coolc's Casco Point Carman Ba Echanted/Shady Is Halstead Bay Phelps Bay Priest Bay Spring Park Bay Smithlown Bay Upper Lake SE Upper Lake SW Northern Tier Crystal Bay Forest Lake Harrison Bay jennings Bay Maxwell Bay Nouh Ar.n Stubbs Bay West Arm Don Gamble Terry Thiel Greg O'Connor John Betz OPEN Jack Arnold OPEN Carole King Ron Langer Jon Scott OPEN Diana Amluxen Joanna Same OPEN OPEN Nancy Bausm in Pauline Bouchard OPEN Jim Colville Ron Moore John Briggs Bert Gallistel jerry Martinson Jean Folin , Wendall Hagen Ra> Crider Rick Meinecke Cary Beeman John Mayer Ernie Blanchard Jeff Fox Larry NtacCormick Bob Austin Ron Fasching Frank Churchill Renee Foster Jane Best-Renier Mike Meyer Charles Timberg Marge Gasch Susan Suniey C*rry Rowlette Tom/Judy Ess Mike Fadell F cte Wahtera Dean Utterberg 1860 Shoreline Dr 20250 Cottagewood Ave 205 West Point Rd 16940 Grays Bay Blvd 235 Woodpecker Ridge 444 Lafayette Ave 330C Fairchild Ave 5110 Meadville St 21800 Byron Circle 1860 Shoreline Dr 2760 West Rd 4756 Kildare Rd 2960 Highland Ct 2933 Case'' Pt Rd 2970 Casco Pt Rd 2515 Kelly Ave 5125 Shady Island Rd 6675 Halstead Ave 3495 E Shore Drive 6180 Pirte Circle 6033 Ridgewood Rd 2586 Dunwoody Ave 5270 Howards Pt Rd 26020 Birch Bluff Rd 6010 Loring Dr 4380 Shady Lane 3260 Bohns Point Rd 1800 Shadywood Rd 1205 Elmwood Ave 1748 Baywood Ln 5061 Minneapolis Av»* 1030 Tonkawa Rd 1330 Cherry PI 3773 Bavside Rd 2043 Lakeside Lane 3824 Sunset Dr 4203 North Snore Dr 2040 Shorewccd Lane 473 8207 574-0693 688-8556 474-3470 470-1726 476-0515 474-8378 47^-2342 933-1095 474-3253 474-5224 476-2351 476-1428 472-3428 472-6347 471-8247 471-8622 471- 0788 474-5549 472- 2914 472-4827 472-7826 472-759: 471-7121 474-7118 474-7462 474-2531 474-1450 471-9018 471- 0741 472- 3877 472-5899 -4/2-7320 471-8178 471- 8353 475-1 100 472- 2864 471- 9534 472- 708C 4 72-5000 1992 CONTRIBUTORS Helm ($100 or morft Charles Timberg Jennnings Bay Groveland HO Assn Wayzata Bay Sam/Joyce Marheld Crystal Bay Zita Wright Grays Bay Navigator ($25 or more) Loren/Naomi Adams Smiihtown Bay Bill Bohnhoff Enchanted Island Bill/Joyce Clark Dick/Gmger Craven Ella Crosby Bob/Susan Doerr Tom/Judy Ess John/Jean Folin Terry/Kathie Forbord Richard Hanson Eiien Heller Nancy Higgms Brian Jackson Robert MacDonald Roger Nord Richard Paulson Harry/Virginia Sweatt David Willette David Weiner Cooks Bay Browns Bay Browns Bay Gideon Bay West Arm Crystal Bay Echo Bay Smiihtown Bay Carsons Bay Smiths Bay Cooks Bay Gideons Bay Upper West Smiths Bay Crystal Bay Wayzata Bay Smithtown Bay BUSINESS MEMBERS Carlson Corr.oanies 540-6000 12755 Highway 65 Plymouth Hour Glass Cleaners 426 Lake St Excelsior 474-6917 Lafayette Club 2800 Northview Rd fi^inrietonka Beach 471-8493 Lundgron Bros. Homos 935 E Wayzata Blvd Wayzata 473-1231 Minnetonka Portable Dredging 474-9454 600 W Lake St Excelsior J I Lake Minnetonka Lakeshore Owners Association ON THE LAKE P.O. Box 596 Excelsior, MN 55331-0596 472-9876 BULK RATE U.S. POSTAGE PAID Excelsior, MN Permit No. 108 Do Not Forward Address Correction Requested Return Postage Guaranteed I t / i'ti c C 1 Ion-Member **CRRT BOOl City Council Orono PO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323-0066 472-9876 LMLOA testifies at State Senate meeting Interested in what events are happening around the lake each week? Do you want to get something off your mind? Call 472-9876 for a schedule of LMLOA activities, lake related government meetings, and general lake events.:a ■- Thank you to Pat Arnst of >PrompType (474-5726) for the desktop publishing of ON THE LAKE Neil Castagna, LnvironmentalDirector (right) at Senate Environment Conimitte. Sen Gen Olson sealed at Committee table. V. , 5 i"r i I >r LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES LEGISLATIVE WRAPUP SESSIONS The League of Minnesota Cities will hold four legislative wrapup sessions on May 12, 13, 15, and 16, 1992, to discuss new laws enacted during the 1992 Legislative session. This year, the League Is adding a Saturday session to encourage mdance by both elected and appointed officials.;ii - To register please return the registration form at the bottom to: LMC Finance Department, League of Minnesota Cities, 183 University Avenue East, St Paul. MN 55101-2526. Please contact Lynda Woulfe at (612) 227-5600 if you have any questions. LMC LBGZSLATIVB WRAPUP BESSIOMB REOZ8TRATIOH Registration fee is $25 per person advanoe; $35 on-site (includes lunch). Please make your oheok payable to the League of Minnesota Cities. Name _ Title_ Name Title Address City Phone ( ) I (we) will attend the session in: Mankato May 12 Bemidji May 15 □Minnetonka May 13 St. cloud May 16 Numoer attending Total enclosed Return tot LMC Finance Department 183 University Avenue East St. Paul, MN 55101-2526 *5' . i i PLEASE DISTRIBUTE TO YOUR COUNCILMEMBERS AND OTHER INTERESTED CITY OFFICIALS AGENDA 9:30 ajn- R^glwtrallon 10:00 auL-NooQ G#n#ril GovDmfTfwm, Jo9t Jamnik Envkonmantal Parsonnal k Ratiramafit Nooa-IKX) p.m. Lynch 1:00-2:15 p.m. Ravanua and Taialion John Tomllnaon, Sarah Haokatt 2:15-2:30 p.m. 2;30.2;i5 p.m. Additional Ravanua laauaa John Tomllnaon, Sarah Haokatt 2:45-J:00 p,m. Transportation, Sarah Hackatt 3:00-3:15 p.m. Elactiona A Ethka StTES Tuasday, May 12 Mankato Holiday lim DoemtCFwn 101 Mam Wadnaaday, May 13 Minnctonica Radisaon Hotel 12201 Riddle Drive Friday, May 15 Bemidii Holiday Ian Highway 2 West Saturday, May It St aoud Sunwood Inn Hwy 23 A4(h Ave. So. Leagu e of Min ne.sota Cities »K.: ::.. ir «-;rr-'^«T'7''7’"-, >i-‘ r ' ♦i te- i..^' 1^v‘"i; •fe-. p0^4^:'rK • ■. S3^;4v--i" I®!#''’f ^f r ■ r A». / ■ pife ' 'vW''p. ^;P' m. ■ !;''5'' ‘ffe'.' '; - - ^41- ■W- 'imp j • 53190.14(HD) TO: FROM Ron Moorse, City Administrator Tom Kuehn, Finance Director ■ DATE:April 16, 1992 SUBJECT: 1991 Police Department Operations - Financial ISSUE - Approval and acceptance of the annual police department financial operating results report. DISCUSSION - The attached schedules compare the 1991 actual expenditures to the budgets for the police department operations in the "base" contract, and the additional manpower contracts for Long Lake and Spring Park. The patrol officer’s work schedules were reviewed with me by Lt. Cheswick whose cooperation and assistance in clarifying certain data I greatly appreciate. Also attached is a copy of the 1991 cost distribution by city and the resulting amount due to or from each city. The report format for the base budget vs actual presents the information by type summary rather than by individual line item. The report format for the estimated cost distribution summary reflects the total base budget and additional manpower rather than the detail, which is presented in the original documents. The net actual 1991 costs are $13,669 under the estimated costs. The amount under is made up of three parts. The base contract is under $4,738; while the Long Lake additional manpower is under $7,428 and the Spring Park additional manpower is under $1,503. The net effect of the 1991 final contract costs is that Long Lake will be credited $6,106 against the final negotiated amount due from the 1989 service year of $6,704, leaving a balance of $598; Minnetonka Beach will be credited $2,602 in 1992 and Spring Park will be credited $1,786 in 1992. f'. mi:/:‘i 53190 13(HD' CITY OP ORONC ACTOAL COST DISTRIBUTION BY PARTICIPANT COMPARED TO BSTINATED COST DISTRIBUTION BY PARTICIPANT 1991 BUDGET YEAR iHu.. km- sa:‘ ■m ' m. ^'1la?'-- ■fa:' ' .. Pift... s#.«? ifi- «'■ wim. i:W- fe-r- ESTIMATED COST DISTRIBUTION ORONO LONG LAPE MINNETONKA BEACH SPRING PARK TOTAL Compoalt 1 applied except to Contract Charge 70.25%13.53%6.34%9.88%100.00% Service Reduction Requested after 1/1/91 $ (4,276)$ (4,276) Total Base Budget $553,518 $126,049 $ 62,287 $ 93,292 $835,146 Total Additional Manpower 117,442 185,533 302,975 Grand Total Estimated Cost $553,518 asaasassiai $239,215 $ 62,287 $278,825 : aaaaaaaaaai SI , 133,845 ■aaaaaaaaa ACTUAL COSTS DISTRIBUTION Base Contract Costs Adelnistration $527,546 52,755 $101,604 13.160 S 47,611 4,761 $ 74.193 7,419 $750,954 75,095 Total Police Town Aid Credit (1990-91) 580,301 (29,958) 111,764 (5,770) 52,372 (2,704) 91,612 (4.213) $326,049 (42,645) Total Net of Town Aid Contract Charge 550,343 e«b • 105,994 21,377 49,668 10,(^17 77,399 15,610 $783,404 47,004 Total $550,343 aasaassss $127,371 33saaaana3~ $ 59,685 $ 93,009 $830,403 • Additional Manpower Town Aid Credit (1990-91) $111,710 (11,957) $192,743 (19,130) $304,453 (31,087) Total Net of Town Aid Contract Charge 99,753 5,985 m 173,613 10,417 273,366 16,402 Total GRAND TOTAL ACTOAL COST $105,738 saaaaasa $550-313 $233,109 vaastfSisasasasHsaaaBS $184,030 asaasaas $ 59,685 $277,039 aaa»aaaaa3aa*a»aaaaaaa $289,768 aaaaaa.a $1,120,176 aaaaaaaaaa Actual Costs Over (Under) Est. Costs $ (3,175) S (6,106) $ (2,602' $ (1,786)$(13,669) aaaaaaaaaa Charge (Credit) to 1992 Contract Billing Date 07/01/92 Billing Date 10/01/92 Credit applied to prior year amount due $ - - (6,106) $ (1,301) (1,301) $ (893) (893) TOTAL CHARGE (CREDIT)$ «6,106)$ (2,602)$ (1,786) |sr^ i|:s «!/■'. pit; 'r ■ ■ IV-'' ;i'! 1 1 ; i ps •> 53190.12 (HD) CITY OF ORONO POLICE DEPARTMENT 1991 BUDGET YEAR - BASE CONTRACT YEAR 0®ED DBOMBER 31, 1991 %life:.pW»'. te, fei, ■ * .' y' ■ ■ rfrV.i't -,v ,... V,fev: J V ^ ■ ■. p§!#/' ® I,?•■'•' 4-t*r- gy,'- iiu y'm.iife^ BUDGET ACTUAL Personal services $529,597 $522,251 Comnodities & supplies 55,890 50,877 Professional services 8,500 20,267 COnunications 9,500 9,374 Printing & publishing 4,500 3,999 Utilities 3,600 3,212 Rentals, radio & building 26,140 26,213 Contract maintenance & repairs 24,000 27,992 Data processing 17,600 20,112 Other contract services 13,500 6,963 Insurances 21,560 22,771 Other charges •2,730 2,295 Capital outlay 42,000 40,692 P06T State Aid Reimbursement (6,460)(6,064) TOTAL BASE CONTRACT $752,657 $750,954 L = S ACTUAL OVER (UNDER) BUDGET .-■■i S (1,703) SS3SSSSSSI •'i life-. CITY OF ORONO POLICE DEPARTMENT 1991 BUDGET YEAR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1991 ll^OMG LAKE ADDITIONAL MANPOWER ^Stlaries - Regular (88,622-4,276 adj.) ‘ Overtime Holiday t.E,R.A,/F.I.C.A. .Jloapitalization & Life Ins. i?|iorJcmens Compensation insurance •^Clothing & Personal Equipment l^viiiberships & Licenses Ji'-: i^PThL ADDITIONAL MANPOWER >.v . ¥■ fitMG PARK ADDITIONAL MANPOWER : ^Ratiirles - Regular Overtime ^ Holiday #i)etft.A./F.I.C.A. 'UlMlpitalization & Life Ins. jiforkmens Compensation insurance J^lbthing & Personal Equipment l^eoibershlps & Licenses m tOTAL ADDITIONAL MANPOWER i " b. ■' '.il- . Mi'- • ■ ' i ■ I ‘ !.r ’ .'Sfe, Wm ‘b-:; V‘ IK' R^tr; .•ftf* '.'S' L'tis'/i b BUDGET $ 84,346 5,000 3,749 12,367 6,012 5,307 812 50 $117,643 $139,763 8,000 5,913 19,285 10,116 8,375 1,300 80 $192,832 53190,11(HD):i• ’1. j ACTUAL ACTUAL OVER (UNDER) BUDGET 83,953 1,643 3,533 11,440 6,060 4,661 370 50 $111,710 $ (5,933) s = S5 =: a 3 as $145,883 3,685 6,338 18,467 10,080 7,475 735 80 $192,743 (89) a rt..,V A "f,-•rrr 11#^ Mh-‘‘F>^lV )■' r>.v. ’*'.■ ^'S ;ii. • * r .* \' ''i • Vr>fT*.*M-m m0: ite. i -.= te'iPfcl- fri^-tei; f. V.-;'■-.> ■ .i*-' i;^:>.‘..r SERVICE YEAR 1990 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 980 1979 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981Ust POLICE SERVICE CONTRACT ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT ADJUSTMENT APPLIED FOLLOWING YEAR CITY OF LONG LAKE (2)$239,215 232,249 218,065 231.886 213,171 213,226 158,005 149,485 130,328 121,497 114,724 112.887 63,936 (3)S (6,106) (3,438) (1)6,704 (9,550) (8,201) (19,691) 3,701 (3,247) 2,320 (14,969) (8,694) (2,466) (892) CITY OF MINNETONKA BEACH $62,287 57,496 53,487 53,812 46.889 44,478 38,753 36,379 32,592 29,459 25,820 26.889 19,616 $(2,602) 2,086 916 (4,369) (73) (988) (1,226) 385 916 (1,205) 564 1,134 (271) CITY OF SPRING PARK year) $278,825 272,741 254,379 244,237 220,193 227,553 173,957 164,235 153,222 141,936 130,548 S (1,786) (9,166) 4,961 (20,498) (21,981) (23,340) (410) (5,845) (2,053) (6,212) 3,302 NET CONTRACT COST $233,109 228,811 224,769 222,336 204,970 193,535 161,736 146,238 132,648 106,528 106,030 110,421 63,044 $59,685 59,582 54,403 49,452 46,816 43,490 37,527 36,764 33,508 28,254 26,384 28,023 19,345 $277,039 263,575 259,340 223,739 198.212 204.213 173,547 150,390 151,169 135,724 133,850 53190.lO(HD) (1) Negotiated reduction from $13,408. (2) Requested reduction in service from $243,491. (3) Applied against 1989 balance due of $6,704. mr..Tir ■ .'l' .'i-'ry^4 SS;:-'i «• w APR 2 1 .JL.«=/*T ir-' »t?l'i*i-. t /. .-. ' - ■ %' .• ms OvCi^ . •>•■ C^- ' rvv-'V'T ’V" m _.A 8sS*.:XUfe .o-vj-wJ.. .. ,Wc_ ^^=tzD--ir .... Vy.. '.- ------cOV - - •wir ___ci:^vc,'« m:'^r . * I-,.*!:.. ■P^.. .•P'-'^S^^r'--.-* >•■-•—;>J[xrV> . '. ' .. .. ' /■ ,.•■ ■ [ >1 ^'-■P-'At- ; f V. ______________ ?■'>.>/-I,.- •yv/'to--■' ®Sit> U’.5T\^ . \ iuT to <ficar^ <=^ i\t^T=k \~r i':z5 ¥A \r>\ a '-v , p-; u- T , — A ... , .■ ■ ■' ■•■ .-. ( ' .,3:A • rf'y'y...’,-"!^:? <=4^3iR=C. m s^4fe J , s _ ' ; •:3Dr-^ sSm- ''A. . y '■ • - \ 7Xy^\/==^X<y^ '"W~24T^V='l\ > • if' ‘A \Ar'. P -S-er-^r,. \3Y'^\T ■Z’r'S.V;V“»to=-\ . • •1 ''■. . “ ■'*;»-f^ -•. ’ vtrisg), ..'.;x,..' ■■'yy .»)-, ■;^‘y'-r*,.v' y;N^' . :^?y7., kf^. $r*^... 3.*^^ i.\ ■^v^iscicir Tr::^r =ser'^ ^V-\ 0 -r-H c> il I "Vr,. V' i*'4i-— jv t i¥-' - ■l^‘ • ;:m " V --. -.'- «*y ' r - 4 , .. B?" ’ • ' • *^1:1 f-^ ______ - _________________ . isv' i^mK4mn,4 >'v . W:W-- ■mi'-:. lii-'m, -, |g¥-«£" ■ & ‘ /^-‘'■*r ■vr-i—T^-*< • » a» Y- u '•<» **■ -- -r' . >.• r^' ' ”'fM-'- ./VV i4 ^ « 4». ^'ii (*■»(>■>. <■i«-»/»-..«o*» . -*r •• -1 V- ': ifctefe •-f ;- ... :*• feii-. : 'M' pivrv ------------- ^ ‘> pp * . .i 4 4 4f ■V *ti VtrarmA'aite- *''■» '■®- |ii¥: i^-' SS - • ' "i- pyU‘.--> iif. ■m0BJKkV il?kV-,>-.- , iy>-S'-,r<^4--'.;;'- Ife. Wit h ■-■ .. .V Wm . i»f.'5 ' iM^yy lii''"’'5?;.'* •; 3 mv »:kvM. m1 Action Report: MeelAB|;2 3 193a LAkE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Lake Use and Recreation Committee iA> 4:30 p.m., Monday, April 20, 1992 Norwest Bank, Wayzata, Community Room Menbers Present: Bert Foster, Deephaven, Chair; James Grathwol, Excelsior; David Co iran. Greenwood; Thomas Reese, Mound; Robert Rascop, Shorewood. Also present: Sgl. Win. Chandler, Sheriff’s Water Patrol; Rachel Thibault, Administrative Technician; Eugene Strommeny Executive Director. The meeting was called to order by Cochran at 4:35 p.m. The agenda was amended to consider the Stipulations Special Event Applications as the first item. for New Foster assumed the Chair. 1. Special Events A. Stipulations for New Special Event Applications Thibault submitted stipulations for Open Water Fishing Tournaments Special Event Permits. The stipulations are the same as in the past with the addition of notification to the partici pants regarding the requirements to be met for exotic control before launching in Lake Minnetonka and removal of lake weeds upon leaving the Lake. Reese asked for a change in wording in line 5 of 3.a. to read: ...Superior mu-s-t--be must have been thoroughly dried or washed down with.... MOTION: Cochran moved, Reese seconded, to recommend approv al of the revised Stipulations for Open Water Fishing Tournament New Special Event Applications. VOTE; Motion carried unanimously. B. New Applications MOTION: Grathwol moved, Reese seconded, to recommend ap proval of the following new Special Event Applications, subject to the recommended stipulations: 1) American Jail Association, Fishing Tournament, Tuesday, May 26, 1992 IN Bass Tournaments of MN, Bass Tournament, Sunday, June 28, 1992 Minnesota Timberwolves Foundation, Jimmy Rodgers Celebrity Fishing Tournament, Tuesday, June 9, 1992 The request of the Excelsior Chamber of Commerce, Fourth of July Fireworks Display, July 4 , 1 992 , was tabled to the next meeting of the committee at the request of the applicant. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. 2) 3) I Lake Use and Recreation Committee April 20, 1992 5%,’’ §■ • ■ \\ :»■ ■■ ^ i,'. 2. Wine and Beer License Renewal Applications; Liquor License Renewal Application with Cn-Sale Sunday Opt ion. MOTION: Foster moved, Reese seconded, to recommend approval of the following: Wine and Beer License Renewals subject to Hennepin County Sheriff’s Department verification and issuance of Charter Boat Certificates A. AI & Alma’s Charter Boats II, III, VI, X, XI, XII B, Paradise Princess Liquor License Renewal with On-Sale Sunday Option, subject to issuance of Charter Boat Certificate. Queen of Excelsior VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. 3. Purpose, Goals and Objectives for Lake Use and Recreation CoouDittee The Lake Use & Recreation Committee Goals & Objectives as presented were those detailed in the Management Plan. The execu tive director explained they were presented to the Committee for comments and prioritization. It was explained that a consultant has been engaged to conduct the overall lake use objectives to develop a design to measure boat density by type of watercraft, and distribution of active, beached and rafting boats. Both items are scheduled for this year. This is also the first year of the objective to conduct a random survey at least once every four years of lake users* attitudes and perceptions. Reese suggested adding control of wakes and noise as en forcement and education objectives. Chandler said noise enforce ment will be enhanced by the new technology developed by the PCA to run decibel tests on suspected violators without setting up a course. Reese suggested auding control of lighting to the objec tives. Grathwol said additional numbers on 'use' of the lake neeo to be developed to formulate data which will draw greater funding to Lake Minnetonka programs. Foster asked Grathwol to take this suggestion and develop a further plan. Reese was excused. The subject of how to define an "event" was added for dis cussion. Chandler has been working with a committee .'rom the State Sheriff’s Association to determine what constitutes an event on the Lake. He will furnish Foster and the Committee with information from their study. The executive director pointed out that a Special Event is defined in the Code. (Sect. 1.02 Subd. 53 and Sect. 3.09). It was agreed that the definition of a Special Event needs further review. - continued ■u:r V V*?.i*-- wmi. ir; ■ Mr.?r ' • 'T ’'- .^‘ ’.r ^5 . </- Sfti'f' Mk> Ir^j' ■; '■^T.f'‘ i* ♦•.'■' ■'. :v KM ^ fBi‘Xu:-'-'- «rv w “•.-> fr<- ; /' ■ • it; ‘.. p!’--pfts KSt;‘isI ■f^- :^f m:-p- ^ W-'>■■'"'■ - II ‘ p-''pi tl-i' ii- Wi-%. ‘kSjiM : t- Lake Use and Recreation Committee April 20, 1992 The executive director asked for discussion of the enforce ment and education objective to review and revise water patrol enforcement levels annually. He questioned whether this review should be made before or aftei the 1992 boating season. Foster responded that the Commfttee will work on enforcement levels with the water patrol. G’*athwol asked that tiie water patrol list of temporary structures be brought into LMCD records. Thibault responded that the office does get a list, but temporary structures are not being licensed by the LMCD. The committee agreed the subject belongs with the Water Structures Committee. It was agreed Grathwol and Foster will tion of additional items to be studied, lighting, definition of an event. work on prioritiza- . e . , wakes, noise, 4. Section 3.09 Special Events, Subd. 5 Open Water Fishing Con tests Section 3.09 Subd. 5 Special Events lists the special re quirements for open water fishing contests. One requirement is that renewal applications submitted later than 90 days before the scheduled event shall be accompanied by a late fee as prescribed by Resolution of the Board. Thibault questioned the purpose of the 90 day requirement. The executive director suggested 30 to 45 days would be ample administrative review time for renewals. Rascop said one reason for the time period is to be sure there is no conflict among the various events. MOTION: Foster moved, Cochran seconded, to direct staff to prepare a Code amendment to reduce the time period for submission of a renewal application for open water fishing contests from 90 days to 30 days. The executive director suggested that, in view of other possible changes in the Code referencing Special Events, the amendment be held until it can all be done at one time to save preparation and publishing costs. Thibault also noted theie is a Resolution which specifies a 90 day advance renewal requirement and that should be reviewed at the same time. Rascop suggested getting representatives of the fishing community involved. The motion was tabled to the staff. 5. Water Patrol Report Sgt. Chandler reported as follows: ♦ Buoys are being put in with an expected 5/9/92 or earlier completion date. ♦ The Ho 1 iday-Johnson Crappie Tournament went off fine. There were 42 boat stops made. One citation was issued, si), written warnings, twenty-nine verbal warnings and six contacts without enforcement. Most stops were for moving violations. ♦ Charter boat and rental boat inspections have started. Water Patrol inspections are being done in conjunction with the State Health Department and boiler inspector. The Queen of Excelsior and P^.raU'se Princess have been inspected . - con t i nued 1 1 ■1 ^liTi MlfH< A' * itltllTl KMUf] ;Tin ^¥lf ran? rtTirt^^riTTfe •vr^milt rant I fiwmws] r- ’^■‘fe-ji^V''"^r‘.: ', y, ., '*/ im_,.Hk*;v^'>i/:yIk,illifey ^ll. 'V Lake Use and Recreation Committee 7. Adjournment April 20, 1992 Orathwol moved, Cochran seconded, that the meeting be ad journed. Motion carried unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 5:35 p.m. FOR THE COMMITTEE: p» i:® wmm'^ Eugene Strommen, Executive Director I'ert Foster, Chair ■<' r^. r , k.. Y’- JS,:;■■ mW0<f.mw p5i*v j:4Mrf - , pif tefei'' *■■if#"’' gg»' §!&■;? -A'■{i£}'‘'. ^"ip,' w' ^ ^V|- . . '.-p'.J j ■'■.t • '>■■ /».r. ■'■f >*! ‘1 ■.-3 I i-L v . Ir H& ;T‘:: il|g-^;-LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 'IP-'"W^rf- BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA L isIS' ‘4llS-;.- 7:00 PM “ Public Hearing 7:30 PM ** Regular meeting Wednesday, April 22, 1992 Tonka Bay City Hall 4901 Manitou Road (County Rd 19) Apr, 2 0 PM - PUBLIC HEARING A1 & Alaa' s Charter Boat I ~ New wine and Beer License applications iSj, ROLL CALL 7:30 PH - REGULAR NEBTING CALL TO ORDER READING OF MINUTES - 3/25/92 Board Meeting 91$^; PUBLIC COMMENTS ■“ From persons in attendance not on agenda mM CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS mM CONSENT AGENDA - Consent Agenda items will be appr.^ved in one motion Uhleaa a Board member, citizen or the petitioner requests an individual mm. ' :*vV-,A dxacuBsion of any item. In that case the item will be removed from consent agenda and considered as a specific item. ■ '■ iter. '■Wm WATER STRUCTURES COMMITTEE, Chair Babcock A. City of Tonka Bay, New Multiple Dock License; recommending approval of a new multiple dock license to add 10 slides to its 37 slip facility. B.Rockvaa Boat Yards, Inc., Site 2, Dock Length Variance, Coffee Cove; recommending approval of the Order for a length variance as drafted C. Ron Whinnery, Dock Length Variance, Carsons Bay; recommending approval of the Order for a length variance as drafted D. K- liSv.' • ' Multiple Dock License Renewals! 1) Renewals without change, recommending approval with orders and stipulations: a) Baycliffe Property Owners Assn., Smithtown Bay b) Wayzata Yacht Club, Site 1 and 2, Wayzata Bay, subject to a valid Conditional Use Permit being in effect from the City of Wayzata •v.= 4 ; c I Board Agenda, 4/22/92, Page 2 CONSENT AGENDA CONTINUED; D. 2) Renewals with change, with orders and stipulations! a) Sailor's World Marina f* Yacht Club, Inc., Smith's Bay - recommending approval of new owner and new name, formerly Shoreline Marir^’ & Yacht Club b) Wayzata Yacht Club, District Mooring Area, Wayzata Bay - recommending approval with minor change in layout of moorings as directed by Wayzata City Council, July 1990 3) Non-Renewing, Holding in Abeyance for $25 fee! recommending approval: a) Presbyterian Homes on Lake Minnetonka, Spring Park Bay, new owner and new name, formerly Lakeshore Village Apts. b) Mai Tai Restaurant, Excelsior Bay ir' •• E.Deicing License Applications! recommending approval of the following new, after-the-fact applications! 1) Michael Kramer, 5425 Timber Lane, Shorewood, Gideons Bay 2) Ed Yaeger, 5445 Timber Lane, Shorewood, Gideons Bay 3) Excelsior Bay Assoc., 603 Lake St., Excelsior, Excelsior Bay Permanent Dock Application, Deposit Refund of $100, for Ed Yaeger, Shorewood, Gideons Bay; recommending approval ii;COMMITTEE REPORTS 1.ENVIRONMENT, Chair Hurr A> Environment Committee organizational meeting announcement, 8!00 am, Tuesday, May 5, 1992 B. . ■ -v. Progress report on Management Plan objective to conduct an independent evaluation of the EWM weed harvesting program pa*:'.. i. i C. D. Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force, Chair Penn Additional business recommended by the committee 2. t ii v,^'. WATER STRUCTURES, Chair Babcock A. Approval of minutes, 4/11/92 meeting PIS?:- B. ^ .o * • * VtTC?' ‘ it V mk’ Multiple Dock License Renewals! 1) Renewals with change, with orders and stipulations! a) Curly's Minnetonka Marina, Inc., Lower Lake South - recommending approval per 4/11/92 committee minutes b) Minnetonka Yacht Club, Site 1, 2 & 3, Carsons & St. Louis Bays - recommending approval with change in configuration at Site i per 4/11/92 committee minutes ir: r.r First reading of Ordinance relating Amending LMCD Code Section 2.04 to District Mooring Areas! A . . { .Second reading of Ordinance relating Maintenance Equipment, as amended by to Storage of Lake c ommi11 e e i V.ld -iife Board Agenda, 4/22/92, Page 3■'j: E. pfH First reading of Ordinance relating to Low Water Variances: Docks in Excess of 100 feet; Multiple and Commercial Dock Licenses; and Permanent Docks; Amending LMCD Code Sections 1.07, 2.01, 2.03 and 2.06 F. r^y. '7 ?.< ■ - *■ ' • Forest Arms Improvement Assoc., Orono, Forest Lake, regarding application for change in configuration with increases in slip sizes on a grandfathered, non*conforming structure (1.16 density)! recommending approval of minor configuration change with no increase in slip sizes G.Additional business recommended by the committee pHife:" ’ • LAKB USE AND RECREATION, Chair Foster^ A» Approval of minutes, 4/20/92 meeting B. mi Mfei -- . ; 3-r-' Cm New Special Event Applications: 1) American Jail Association, Fishing Tournament. Tues. . 5/26/92 2) IN Bass Tournaments of MN, Bass Tournament, Sun., 6/28/92 3) MN Timberwolves Foundation, Jimmy Rodgers Celebrity Fishing Tournament, Tues., 6/9/92 ■■ D • Wine and Beer License Renewal Applications for Charter Boats: 1) A1 & Alma's II. Ill, VI, X, XI. XII 2) Paradise Princess Queen of Excelsior Charter Boat Liquor License Renewal Application with 0n~Sale Sunday Option mk.»W'^ Sfrtipfe*- *• B. F. Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol report Additional business recommended by the committee LAKE ACCESS TASK FORCE. Chair Grathwol FINANCIAL REPORTS, Treasurer Boswinkel u • ^ 1, Aw>r.ii a. March Statement of Cash Transactions to be combined with April ^7 ' report due to bookkeeper absence ■B. Audit of Vouchers for Payment EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT, Strommen A. Board Workshop Agenda UNFINISHED BUSINESS Wm:NEW BUSINESSirf/ So ADJOURNMENT bm»m.a n if <* %€■ ms \ 1 - 4 i 1 ■1 $ I l.V*'r<^♦? .^y*'[V*^ . .V »'r'‘ p8»' ■''' »:• ::^i; ...■CS.''j»Vr--«.'iV^ 81^" f-t mi.,:*’ r:^i«"'”' Ktl* »-? ; :<*.J.-.> m' "■ 2=-.-r“»<. p te-.: '..■ W”' iS^v*K ' life^ iP=v- .' '•! • .! ' pit %i: lie:?';' ■ it- , f‘>F -if* f .=«* r M. < . ,.< VWZ’-^-. /■«; ? ' :\V : pl?"e te?*?: ■: fas'' ' ■te ': ^Wsg.; p;SSs- His. p'ip^€.. -" '■ Vv^. P-a-fVci^/r: • -..' r ^ ■ ef«s'''M' = Slltl-' -4 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICTRegu1ar Meeting7;30 p.m. , Wednesday, March 25, 19‘>2Tonka Bay City Hall Draft CALL TO ORDER: Reese at 7:30 p.m. The meeting was called to order bv Vice Chair ROLL CALL: Members Present; Thomas Reese, Vice Chair, Mound; Bert Foster, Deephaven; James Grathwol, Fxcelsi'^r: Jan Boswinkcl. Treasurer, Minnetonka Beach; Scott Carlson. Minnetrista : Robert Rascop, Shorewood; Tom Penn, Tonka Bay: George C. Owen, Victoria; Duane Markus, Wayzata. Also present: Charles LeFevere, Counsel; Steven Tallen, Prosecuting Attorney; Sgt. Wrn. Chandler, Sheriff’s Water Patrol; Rachel Thibault, Administrative Technician; Eugene Strommen, Executive Director. Members Absent: David Cochran, Chair, Greenwood; Win. A. Johnston, Minnetonka; JoFllen Burr, Orono: Douglas Babcock, Secretary, Spring Park; Robert Slocum, Woodland. READING OF MINUTES: Grathwol moved, Boswinkel seconded, to dispense with the reading of the 2/26/92 minutes "nd to approve them as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments from per.sons in attend ance not on the agenda. CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS: There were no announcements from the Chair. CONSENT AGENDA; There were no items on the consent agenda. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. ENVIRONMENT, Chair Hurr A. Eurasian Water Milfoil I'ask Force, Chair Penn Penn presented the minutes of the Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force meeting held on 3/17/92. SONAR TEST TREATMENT. Penn reported representatives of the DNR, Lake cities, LMCD, Lake Associations, residents of Carsons Bay, St. Louis Bay and St. Alban's Bay, Freshwater Foundation and of DowElanco were present to talk about the use of SONAR, an aquatic herbicide, for treatment of FliWM. The DowElanco people shared test results of SONAR used in Michigan lakes. The consen sus was that before proceeding to test SONAR, a base 1 i.ne needs to be established to measure the impact of SONAR. This year is building period. Testing the chemical fol-to be an information lows next year. - continued A» . ^ i < wm •i ‘*iyfe- *r I fe-v fm.: :'V»,' ,. ■ N'. » ; V S8fr- . ' ■- &>rMK psaj- :■; -'. rf*.‘ U$¥0y 'KW: tii'v;-: : :• 'V ir ^yym- 'i W '•»;' 4t-^- V- mm- iffc'’: ftei:-'i#"''M.y T' •i.iCi'* c- '-V' m\j: V -•V” mM " M LMCD Board of directors March 25, 1992 tests with product. (5 gals) to use as r t i t data gat lie ring stage b y the nature of the residents about the life. He wouId not Wendy Jrowell, University ol Minnesota, has submitted an estimate of $7,160 to do an aquatic plant inventory in St. Al ban’s Bay. The cost of a SONAR application on St. Alban’s Bay as an example, is between $20,000 and $25,000. The cost is expected to be shared by the city. Bay lakeshore owners and LMCD. Dow Elanco is not supporting individual lake is providing DNR $5,000 worth of SONAR determines. Penn said the Task Force is still in and not ready to make a proposal to the Board. Foster said some residents of St. Louis Day and the City of Deephaven are willing to contribute some treatment money. Foster would like the District to consider the St. Louis Bay as a test area this year. He acknowledged that there would not be time for a scientific aquatic plant inventory, but it would demonstrate the potential for cost sharing. SONAR has to be applied shortly after ice out. He would not like to delay treat ment . Penn said he is concerned that, just word "chemical", there will be concern by- effect on the Lake, fishing and other plant want to start treatment without the data and communication with affected interested parties. Howard Bennis. Deephaven City Council, said two parties have been treating St. Louis Bay with 2,4-D. Bennis believes the residents and the city would be willing to use SONAR in its place. Penn said that if this could be arranged by the residents through the DNR he would not object, but he would not support the LMCD doing it. The District must be conservative and do it scientifica11y. Grathwol said he does not bel ieve the District would have any basis for objecting fo the city and their residents using SONAR at their expense. He would not endorse it on behalf of the District. The executive director said the purpose ol the program, initiated by the District. is to find a bay in which to do an evaluation of SONAR, it would then determine if it could be used over all of Lake Minnetonka. The cost of treating the whole Lake has been suggested to be $2 million. Boswinkel wondered if there is some way the people on Crys tal Bay could participate by shore treatment and keep track of what happens. Penn responded that SONAR is not good lor spot shore treatment. Carlson spoke in favor of doing the complete study. If there is the possibility of obtaining outside funding it is important to have complete documentation. He said this is a good year to do the preliminary study while the Lake is high and low Milfoil growth is expected. Foster said he is not study. In his opinion the proposal is an opportunity through cooperation. opposed to the complete scientific .St. Louis Bay/City of Ueephaven/LMCD to demonstrate that it can be done - con tinued ii..ic. di2«ta&v It. iv*fi-kav‘"* I#*'' 6i iK-y. i-vC/' |ps»«" ^ W" WV;;. SSSf*^ ii;,7., !#>r- 'Mm:'-ifil# y;Iv..-.? iffr fati.''v;" “' i.: X' MM0m-, 'lpi> iSPi'* Bi». iP%i.. t'l k •- pA'i®' te' ife -M&. LMCD Board of Directors March 25, 1h Q 2 said St. .Alban’s Bciy was being con- criteria 11) r study because it is an of depths and a variety of aquatic The executive director sidered as it would meet the enclosed bay, has a variety plant growth. MOTION: Penn moved, Grathwol seconded, to support $7,160 for the investigation of the effect of SON.AR herbicide on Eura sian Water Milfoil and native vegetation per the proposal submit ted by Wendy J. Crowell. DISCUSSION: Penn said a specific bay would have to be selected. It would have to have the support of the city and the residents before proceeding with the expenditure. In respon.se to Carlson’s question about the ti:iiing, the executive director .said the aquatic plant study could start as late as mid-May. lie explained the technical procedures used in doing the survey. Boswinkel was interested in knowing the position the Fresh water Foundation has taken on the subject. The executive direc tor said they have a representative on the Task lorce and have been support!’e of the proposal. Markus suggested using data from other studies. Penn re sponded that the Michigan studies do not necessarily reflect the situation on Lake Minnetonka because of the depth of tlie lakes studied. The Task Force was invited by UowElanco to visit the sites in Michigan. Penn said it would be better to do the study loca11y. Owen said politically this will be closely watched and the possibility for misinformation should be avoided. It is impor tant that whatever the District doc.s is done carefully. Foster said it is important t (' do an LMCD study. He said St. Alban’s Bay would be ideal because it is large but because of its size will cost a lot of money. ($20.0 000 - $25,000 is the preliminary estimate for a bay of 165 acres with the water volume involving depths from 30’ - 48’.) MOTION AS AMENDED: Penn moved, Grathwol seconded, to ap prove the concept of the plan to go ahead with tlie scientific study and to present more specifics on bays and the cost of the study at the next meeting. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. B. Independent Evaluation of Eurasian Water Milfoil Weed Harvesting Program. Penn said a Management Plan objective calls for the inde pendent evaluation during 1992 of the weed harvesting program. A draft outline of the areas to consider in doing the evaluation was distributed. The evaluation is to be completed by January, 1993. The cooperating agencies are the MN DNR, University of Minnesota, Hennepin County. Freshwater Foundation, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and Hennepin Parks. The executive director and Chair Hurr have solic ited comments on the draft from the cooperating agencies. 11 mu m' i; ite: 'A'.’ , t!j - t y^s..; mim mm:M:-P'm ■■r --Vj'.. , '.■•■ . ,- ‘■-'rtl;■ f.-: ' #.*A’ LMCD Board of Directors 2. WATER STRUCTURES, Grathwol Consent Agenda March 25, 1992for Chair fUihcock to approve citizen or MOTION: Grathwol moved. Rascop seconded, following agenda items unless a Hoard memher. petitioner requests an individual discussion of any item, that case the item will be removed from the consent agenda considered as a specific item. A. Approval of minutes, 3/14/92 meeting t he the I n and C. Ron Whinnery, Dock Length Variance, Carsons Bay; approv ing length variance to 511’ instructing Counsel to draft the Order. F. Bupp Dock Length Variance, Carsons Bay, approval of the Order granting the variance as drafted. G. Multiple Dock License Renewal Applications: Item 2. Chapman Place Marina. Cooks Day, approval with the new agreement between Chapman Place Association and Vincent McClellan, dba Minnetonka Dock and Plow Service. Item 4. David Thomas Development (Bayshore III Addi tion), South Upper Lake; approval subject to payment of outstand ing fees. Item 5. Howard’s Point Marina, South Upper Lake; (with changes in Slips 1-14 per site plan submittedapprova1 11/88) Change Item 6. 1992 Multiple Dock License Renewals Without Navarre Cove Homeowners Association, Carman’s Bay Minnetonka F.dgewater Apartments, Spring Park Bay Shoreline Marina & Yacht club. Smiths Bay Subject to Village Certificate (expires 4/18/92); Driftwood Shores, Harrisons Bay Hary Kreslins, St. Albans Bay Lord Fletchers of the Lake. Col fee Cov'e Park Hill/Park Island (for 44 HSU), Seton Lake Seton View, Seton Lake Upper Lake Minnetonka Yacht Club, South Upper Lake H.New Multiple Dock License Applications Item 2. City of Wayzata, Broadway Docks, Wayzata Bay Item 3. Clay Cliffe Homeowners Association, Old Chan nel Bay Item 5. Eagle Bluff Homeowners Association, Halsteds Bay (Needs approval from the City of Minnetrista.) I. First Reading of Ordinance Relating to Storage of Lake Maintenance Equipment on Lake Minnetonka J. Deny request to Waive Late Fee for Shorewood Yacht Club, Currently Under Receivership. - continued mmsmm j . .a 1 Ti- Mru IM... g- ■: &r .felt-. \r>I- '■ ■■ ^ KVf^--: •" •, i:|rf- . -V • '. -V ; t-. '■gl *’ ri • • -V • l'^:,»,f._. <.-* -f-" tv -'-■ ■"R;foil' f - «V- ::f .lift LMCD Board of Directors VOTE ON CONSENT AGENDA JTIiMS 13. Rockvain Boat Yards Marcfi 23, 199 2 ‘lulion larricd unanimously. Silo 2 Dock l.cnKth Variance, Co rice Cove. MOTION: Uraihwol moved. Boswinkcl secondctl. to approve the Rockvam Boat Yards, Site 2, len^^Lh variance to I3J and the addition of a 25’ make ready dock to accommodate the f ishinp boat amenity, instructing Counsel to drall the Order. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. D. Halsted Acres Improvement Association (IIAIA).. New Multiple Dock License, Hals ten’s Bay Grathwol reporteti the commit tee recomineiuled approval of a 7 slip multiple dock license, accepting $ 3 .s 0 a s negotiated back-1icens i ng fees. There are IJ pioperty owners ol nut lot 1, Halstead Acres Second Addition. The Out lot has .1(0 ol shore line, for which the Code allows ^ slips. the application is for 13 slips. Rascoo asked if the applicant Grathwol answered that tlie applicant that the recommendation allows, but pressed concern that the applicant that they are entitled to thirteen, that could be done would be by t>ack to do that the applicant would have had 13 docks at that time, and it has not been able to do that. MOTION: Rascop moved, Grathwol seconded, lo deny the appli cation of Halsted Acres Improvement Association for a 13 slip multiple dock license and to approve a 7 slip inulli|)le dock license, the number permitted under the LMCD Code, accepting $350 as a negotiated back licensing lee. Ari adjustment in application fees is to be made and the apijllennt is to submit a new site plan. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. has agreed to the 7 slips, is awa re of the ^ slip limit does not agree. Ids tor ex- could come back and contend L e E e v e r e said t h e o n 1 y w a y licensing to 19'^.S. In order to provide evidence that it E. Bean *s Greenwood Marina, New Multiple Dock License and Length Variance, St. Alban’s Hay Grathwol presented the committee recommendation to deny the variance to relocate S slips beyond lOU* and to recommend renewal of the Multiple Dock License with 3 slips. » 101 , *1-111 and #106, relocated within 100’ MOTION: Grathwol moved, Rascop seconded, 1) To deny the Greenwood Marina variance application to relocate 8 slips be>ond 100’; 2) The dock structure. SI p #40. 100. 99, 80. "’n and T118. allowed under a temporary lew Aater variance, to l)c removed by May 1 , 1992; 3) The renewal apfi I i ca I i ot» to be subject to further staff review of existing dock configuration and s I i i> s i >.es . Jirn Hillis. City of Greenwood C'ounc i I membe r . asked whether Slip #82. is included in the motion. The executive director said #82, while 1 i c e n .s e d for .32’. is a c t u «a 1 I y 44 . which is not in eluded in the motion.. He said t h i and other slips a:e not in agreement with the site plan. - cv'ii l i nued ■ V 3 &'* ■ W--wk?~ 1^-fe-f'if' m 't/; i^: ■i" te':-W&^^§|-v Wr ft If' I'®'- te# ^ ' ’% ■ - V Sill-'2.'- iS-Wi-‘it. I '^''' ■' ■ P'S’ itfey' '3^' fe : • ..W-"' |@£';te'.. :V- ipvte>' f.-.. ilik:..:. LMCD Board of Directors March 25, 1992Carlson suggested a time limit he placed on when Bean has to come in with an application lor a new dock license. If not he would be operating without a license. MOTION AMENDED: The motion was ame.ided to show that Bean is to be back to the Board with a revised <ipplication by the April Board meeting. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. Gl. Excelsior Park Tavern, Excelsior Bay I icense * * * V MOTION: Grathwol moved, Rascop seconded, to approve the Excelsi or Park Tavern Multiple Dock Licetjse renewal as follow.,; 1. Approval of the amenities, stipulated on the new dock as: Slip available for Sheriff’s Water Patrol Pool available for public swim lessons Meeting room Charter boat with passenger service and dock storage, minimum - 4 boats Handicapped access to docks Lakeside deck pedestrian lookout Outdoor licensed food and beverage service Dock attendant to monitor dock use Approve 32 slip configuration for 12 transient and 20 storage slips. The draftlig of the Order for the 40 slip license await applicant s final decision on the new dock plan. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. * * ♦ ♦ 2 1 s G3. Foxhill Homeowners Assn., Smiths Bay MOTION: Grathwol moved, Rascop seconded, to approve the relocation of Slip 1, a 32’ slip with a 40’ canopy, to the right of the Foxhill Homeowners Association main dock, subject to a letter of approval from the neighl'’'r. DISCUSSION: LeFevere stated that the Foxhill Multiple Dock License exists under a length variance granted in 1978 for a specific configuration. That configuration was amended in 1985. LeFevere suggested the Board make it clear that the granting of a specific Multiple Dock License rerewal with a change has the approval of the neighbor to the east. Thibault showed the site plan submitted 3-11-92 by Roy Zitzloff, which is not to scale. LeFevere noted that if the site plan for the original vari ance and the dock plan approved in 1985 are changed to show slip #1 in a different location, it is no longer possible to build the rest of the dock without crossing the lot line to the west. It appears that for this year the Association is only planning on using 8 of 13 slips. The Board is proposing to approve only the plan as shown with the reduced number ol slips. If the Associa tion should want to add the 5 additional slips lor which they are licensed as a non-conforming grandfathered license, they will have to re-apply to the Board with a new dock plan. f , • 7 5.r.S tv .-i ‘•»4.v'^ * 1.*'.'.r -.\'»t*. 1'.' 'fe^% p«?.! ,rj -vrvv m-' ,<^•2- - fei'-'- i<?;:' .«'i)'- ■•■ ‘¥_ p-'te*- »'»• ’: .Vi »■«*m0^''^0- ppteipVi K?-P''-' '■ '■*,^P5--v, ' ■■■- i5.:&'.K.,/ IIP: :■: BM ?■ wm-^ .vtt iPr ■ IlfV^:.: .-^V'' *-■ pi-sP-: LMCD Boai'1 of Dircctoi • s March 2*^. 1992 there i .s no iiien- . the .i)M‘ 1 i ca I I on t; .1 '■• CO!' t e s po lui - s e t ha V. k \'. i I h I h e Carlson said he is uttcoinl o r t ah 1 e l)eeau^.e tioned of a side setback variance. Me l)elte'.e should go through the normal variance procedure, ed that the Board has allowed s I i p.s within a permission of the neigiibor. i>iatliwol added this i ■. consistent with Board action when there are converging picrpeitv lines. LeFevere .said there is a (!ode piovision which al lous ail jacent property owners to adjust their side setbacks by muin i I agree- me n t . T n e e .x e c u 1 i v e dir e c t o r a il d e d that this p a i t 1 c u 1 a r d o c k structure is below a bluff. The adiacent property owners are not bothered by the dock visuall>. VOTE: Motion carried una.n i mous I >■. II. New Multiple Dock License Applications .Sul)ject to board Waiving Public Hearing Item 1) Schmitt’s Marina, 1.\celsior Ba;.' Tf Committee has recommended appro\.il of a new dock 1'cense with a I nor change to relocate two slips within the Di»ck Use Area for Schmitt’s Marina, subject to appioval ol the City ol Exce1sior. The executive director reported Schmitt is concernetl about having to go through a further [public review process with the City for a minor change. (irathwo! and the executive iliieclor have contacted the Mayor and Avlm i n i .s l 1 a t o r of the city ol L.xcel- sicr a.nd they have agreed the vity has no need lor luriher re view. MOTION: Grnthwol moved. Foster seconded, to approve the application of Schmitt’s Marina li>r‘ a new .Multiple I^ock bicen.se with a minor change in con f i v u r a t i oii that does not increase slip size, or number of BSU or WSU. waiving a Public lleaiing. VOTE: Mo t i on carried u na n i mou .s 1 y . Item 4. Minnetonka Yacht Club. Site 1. Carson.s Bay Grathw'ol reported a question has been raised about allowing slidestobeconvertedtorlocks. MOTION: Grathwol moved. Reese seconded, to refer the Minne tonka Yacht Club application back to the committee. VOTE: Motion carried un.ui imous1y. K. Additional Business Reese a.skeil if I heir is .1 provi* iv>n leijuiring .1 new Multiple Dock License holder to build the dock within a i.crtain period ol time. Specifically he mentioned the Ri>l^ I’.ir triers license li^r a dock in Spring I’nrk. Grathwol respi^nded that (’hair R.abcock is working on that matter and wi I I t>i ine it to the coiiiin i t t ee. Lel’evere said the I.MCD (‘txle iliies not have anx l i me I imi'.i"' The reason it has not lieen inc’Miledt ion. is on an annual basis. l.elevere s.'iid there may thered status that the applic.-mt may preserve as changes since the license w.-is granted in 19.S9. “ con t inued i s t !iat the 1 i cens i ng be some granclfa- a ( i‘ s u I I o I Code 'v''I'j-' i‘ y i i |vIf-'. 1^'•. lx *J‘r^ l.'-f g& %y. Ji' fi’'l<g:;-vsw- r/^J ^ ■. • • Pi'^Vy- ifc t-m.wmr^■>,' 'V fifc:: 4'^' Ifv V- if# ■»®f||:A: ■ • ‘ i ‘ • ^ ■ i'. . t- .V* fMm^P KM: "r ■ i ’•4- Mfr:A’ Mimxixr ii' ' ■ MX ■; A "r miipl' ►,^tii •. P#....... 4#.wm§: i. : LMCD Board of Directors March 25, 1992MOTION; Rascop moved. Carlson seconded vere to draft a Code amendment to put a t .• me new licenses granted. VOTE; Motion carried unanimously. to instruct Le Fe- limit on non-use of 3. LAKE USE AND RECREATION, Executive Director Strommen for Chair Foster. Due to a lack of a quorum, no committee recommen dations were adopted. A. Special Event Application, Minnetonka Public Schools The Minnetonka Public Schools have made application for a Solar Boat Regatta, Saturday, 6/20/92 with 6/21/92 as an alter nate for bad weather, Gideon’s Day. requesting LMCD waive or reduce fees and deposit due to school project’s limited funding. The executive director said the member.s present at the committee meeting on 3/16/92. suggested collecting the full fee and making a contribution of an equal amount fro«n the Save the Lake Fund. MOTION: Grathwol moved. Doswinkel seconded, to approve a Special Event Permit for the Minnetonka Public Schools for a Solar Boat Regatta on 6/20/92 or 0/21/92. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Gratliwol moved, Boswinkel seconded, to contribute, from the Save the Lake Fund, to the Minnetonka High School Solar Boat Account, a sum equal to tne Special Event Permit fee charged for the Solar Boat Regatta. VOTE; Motion carried, Rascop voting nay. B. New Wine and Beer License Applications for Al & Alma’s Charter Boat 1. The staff recommends waiving the investigation and investi gation fee because of the previous approval of Al & Alma’s other six wine and beer licenses. Rascop asked where the boats are being stored. He mentioned previous problems with the charter boats being stored in unau thorized locations. MOTION; Rascop moved. Grathwol seconded, to waive the investigation and investigation fee for Al & Alma’s Charter Boat I wine and beer licenses, contingent on their boats having a legal storage location. VOTE; Motion carried unanimously. Thibault added a Public Hearing will be held these new wine and beer license applications. i n Apri1 for 3. Fundraising Proposal - Tonka Wet Spot Corp. The executive director summarized a fund raising proposal by Tonka Wet Spot which offered $I per I-shirt sold to the Save the Lake Fund. The T-shirt slogan, "Locals only. Lake Minnetonka' was deemed not in the public interest and therefore proposed to be declined. The Board concurred without further discussion. ■if W‘ & & fW‘ P; m' '-'■■a - i'V'-6# hU., ■• fB;' j. "Mv llS : HfiV' l^-.p" *it"'rbfe' .fl ■m ''>b- ; L-Oi I ** .■ r.. -;-'f V ■ -1 ■ 5v^;V [ft-te:te^-' MMM li V5i> :m^^'- LMCD noard of Directors March 25, l‘)02 4. Water Patrol Report Sgt, Chandler added <.)ne mo r e ice incident to the Water Patrol report submitted to the Lake Use a.ul Keereati*.iu ri'iimi i 11 ee. A person on a bike went through the ice in a channel anil sus tained injuries. This makes a total of .11 t h r ough-t he-i ce inci dents: 14 cars, 12 snowmobiles, 1 AIV, .1 people, 1 animal. Chandler reported the Hennepin County Ho<ird will host the National Association of Counties convention in Minneapolis this summer. The Water Patrol has been nominated for an award for its training, education and enforcement of the Boating While Intoxi cated law. As an aside Chandler added tliat the only state to exceed Minnesota in BWI arrests was l lorula .vith 20 7. Minnesota had 206, 73 on Lake Minnetonka. lie anticipates the numbers will go down because of education, preventive enforcement and use of the designated driver. Rascop said he recoi.'cd reiJoits f i om i he two consultants responding to the Management Plan Boat Ust: Densitv Study Request for Proposals that they encountered lioateis leaving the Lake* who were "too dr nk to inteiview". fhat was in I9.S6, 1088 and 1989. Boswinkel mentioned litter left on Wayzata Bay from fish houses. Chandler said UNR Conservation Officers handled the clean up. They have cited 6 or 7 people for leaving debris. Rascop said a DNR Conservation Officer told him the County will not prosecute misdemeanors occurring on the Lake. Rascop suggested violations be written on the LMCU Code. Steven Tallen, LMCD prosecutor, questioned that the County Attorney would allow his people to make a decision not to prosecute. Tallen will inquire further. Chandler reported it appears that the bill introduced in the legislature strengthening provisions of the I)WI law will pass. The law will provide for DWM offenses to be considered in a DW’I citation, bringing the BWI portion of the law in line with the DWI penalties throughout t lu State. 4. LAKE ACCESS TASK FORCE, Chair Gratliwol Grathwol reported the first meeting of the I.ake Access Task Force was held on 3/11/92. lie thanked the eight directors who were present. There was a frank and open exchange of views. Since the meeting he has met with, pec^le who might be helpful in pursuing the activities of the Task torce. He will have more specifics shortly. Commissioner Sando of the DNR has indicated they are willing to commit staff to the Ta'^k Force. 5.FINANCIAL REPORTS, Treasurer Boswinkel A. The Board received the Siatcmerii of Cash Transactions for the month ending 2/29/92. The report B. Audit of Vouchers for Payment \vas order'^d filed. MOTION: Boswinkel moved, Gralliwol sc'coiuled , to appiove payment of hills in the amount of $ 1 7 . u o ^ ~ . cheeks # 8409 through 8448. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. 7 ' 'P- W<-.: ^.. :h: ■i- yr..^^^‘'-. * • i ■.:* ■ fiV' i>>^% -fr u ■,m-. S^V'v i ^ v; 1 "* • * ;. .'if; LMCD Board of Directors March 25, 1992 The executive director reported the 1991 audit has been received from Schibilla & Associates. Before submitting it to the Board he will go over it with the officers. there are no points of concern at this time. The financial position is re flected as being in line with the closing rei'tirt of the year. The audit wilt be available at the next meeting. 6. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT, Strommen A. Strommen reported that the Prosecuting Attorney Steve Tallen is leaving the Holmes & Graven firm to share office space with the firm of Luther, Ballenthin & Carruthers. Tallen said Holmes & Graven has decided not to offer prose cution service anymore. Tallen does not plan any changes in the terms and conditions of his appointment by the District. The executive director stated Kim Elvrum, DNK, has spoken highly of Steve fallen’s services. Chandler said the Water Patrol has been mo’e than happy working with Steve Tallen. Chandler said Tallen is the most knowledgeable and exj)erienced attorney for water prosecutions in the state. MOTION: Foster moved. Boswinkel seconded, to continue Steven Tallen’s services as prosecuting attorney for the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District in association with Luther, Ballenthin & Carruthers. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. B. 1992 Lake Minnetonka Boat Use Study and Recommendation of Consultant Strommen reported responses to the request for proposals to prepare and execute a study of Lake Minnetonka were received from Dr. David Arndorfer, Arndorfer Associates Inc., Knoxville, TN and Dr. Arnie Blomquist, Biocentric, Inc.. Arden Hills. MN. Both applicants are highly qualified. A review of the proposals was conducted by four MN DNR specialists along wi^^h LMCD Board members Reese, Rascop and Grathwol and the executive director. The prospects were further interviewed by Tim Kelly MN DNR Research analyst, Grathwol, Rascop and Strommen. The recommendation submitted in the 3/25/92 report from Strommen notes that the LMCD and MN DNR are fortunate to have two qualified bidders for this piojcct. Two factors in particular, however, favor the recommendation of Dr. Arnold Blomquist, Bio- centric, Inc.: - 1) the firm’s demonstrated and full understand ing of the critical aerial photo requirements of the project and 2) the stronger research team, consisting of three support staff in addition to Dr. Blomquist. These three persons provide a FhD in Statistics and Experimental Design from the University of Minnesota, a survey research specialist, and research assistant for natural resource and recreation stuilies. - con Iinued I f • L*''\ >rr '1K.t-r‘<r-i-* :1-:) :• * p. iP: ,*',V^ -1^ K^'-' ip^r ■fc"' fe:,' p..P^FF'-'- ■' Fmm lyp'" ii L J>'> M r.F^ j '.,.>lKr-n. wf- Ef';v ^'#' ■ • mm:,r^:.■ *'l^' LMCD Board of Directors March 25, 1992 Kascop seconded to authorize the MOTION: (3rathwol moved recommendation as stated and LMCD to execute a contract with Biocentric. Inc execute a study of 1992 Lake Minnetonka boat approval by the MN DNR. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. , to accept officers of to prepare use, subject t he t he and I o The executive director stated the DNK will execute a sepa rate state contract to help fund the study, sharing on one-half the $25,000 contract fee. C. Over—Flight of Lake and Photography Opportunity The executive director reported an opportunity is available to do an aerial car/trailer count on April IH during the Holiday- Johnson Crappie Tournament. David Dotzenroth, a private pilot, has offered his services and tlie use of his airplane at an $85 hourly rate to make a photographic survey of the lake accesses. Strommen would participate as the ptjo l og i a phe r . 'I'hc overall project cost would not be in excess of $300. Strommen will also look into acquiring more suitable camera equipment lor the task. MOTION: Grathwol moved, Foster seconded, to authorize arrangements for an over-flight ol the Lake and photographic survey of accesses as detailed by the executive director. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. D. Board Workshop April 25 , 1992 has been tentatively set as the date for a full Board workshop. The executive director said the idea he suggests would be to secure a consultant to present a program on team building. The cost of a professional presenter could range from $500 to $1500. An orientation program for the board members would follow. An indication from the members as to the kind of things they would like to discuss would be solicited in a mailed survey. Boswinkel suggested the presentation should include the background and the history of the LMCD. Carlson said he would not be enthusiastic about spending $1500. Rascop believes there are issues that the members should discuss. Owen said, as a new member he needs information on the financial history, dock history and to hear from the i?iore experi enced members. The executive director will proceed witli plans for a one day workshop on April 25 and arrange for a facilitator. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to Reese declared the meeting adjourned at 9 come 2 5 p before t lie Board, m. Signatures on Page 12 fe-’ i= I i V '1 rTti-i^ I if- 'j- r* LMCD Board of Directors March 25, 1992 David Cochran, Chair , ■'■ • iiii« , .0^ , ,, %Mm' ■fm:: V -. -:x * H-......, .> *4« 4 :^=- * . .-v'■ \- •c i,- V P mm.fiMiil Douglas Babcock. Secretary I / i i ■V': ■ “V-m ■ ■ ■•■t. 'llip-.. Vvfisrv,; Kivr ■••■ ■ ■H-h ?»v ' fc-’’*'- ' ip'-'Ift'• : ■^r *‘f^t ‘^ iS: Pr ' y ■ ■■ .V ■V-, "fe ■,•• i MU -■ mu ■ • .■ ^ h£n< K'-W>- IK& 5-ii«. «■rnwmm' 'v^tUUK.. -'P ■Step.: LAKE MINNETONKA CONSEBVATION DISTRICT Action Report: Meeting: Water Structures Committee 7:30 a.m.. Saturday, April 11, 1992 Norwest Bank Bldg., Wayzata, Room 1J5 Douglas Babcock, Chair. Sprinc Park: Bert James Grathwol, Excelsior; David Cochran, Rascop, Shorewood; Robert Slocum. Woodland. Also present: Rachel Thibault. Administrative Technician: Eugene Strommeni Executive Director. Menbers Present: Foster, Deephaven Greenwood; Robert The meeting was called to order by Chair Babcock at 7:35 a.m 1. City of Tonka Bay, 3/25/92 Public Hearing Report The committee received the report of the Public Hearing held on 3/25/92 to consider a new multiple dock license application from the City of Tonka Bay to add 10 slide storage spaces to its 37 slip facility at 4001 Manitou Rd.. for rental to residents. In answer to a question raised at the Public Hearing, Ihi- boult reported the Tonka Bay administrator has advised that no launching ramp exists at the site. The 10 slides will be rented for non-restricted watercraft. For licensing purposes they are counted as Boat Storage Units and Watercraft Storage Units. MOTION: Slocum moved, Foster seconded, to recommend approv al of a new multiple dock license for the City of Tonka Bay to add 10 slides to its 37 slip facility. VOTE; Motion carried unanimously. 2. Minnetonka.Boat Works Presentation Re Sales at a Dock Console There was no one present to represent the Discussion was delayed for a presentation. Staff that soft drink and ice dispensing machines on docks will included in this review. petitioner, was advised be 1ocation, ex- new 1 oca tion 3. Rockvam Boat Yards, Inc., Coffee Cove - Draft Order for Dock ^ The committee received the Findings and Order regarding the application of Rockvim Boat Yards. Inc. for a variance from the dock length requirements of the LMCD Code for permission to move the 18 slip dock wing on Site 2 from its current -v- tending up to 128 feet from the shoreline, to a extending 153 feet from the shoreline. It was noted the Order is to be corrected to Boat Yards.Inc, as the applicant. MOTION: Grathwol moved. Foster seconded, approval of the Order regarding the application of r Yards, Inc. for a length variance from the requirements of the LMCD Code for construction and maintenance of a dock in accora ance with the plan drawing. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. show Rockvam to recommend Rockvam Boat ■9m-: -I r, I'i n ■■I i :4 I - ..• ^ 4-T,'* '..Ov' *••',■ •' ■V . * ;\-hr'pfe:^iff -■ j ^ fcpt'-' Pl* .: ^ »|i«^',^V rKl^rr ;-V^ iSii»‘: #1 J^^'' v,v^- *r sS' S«S♦4't'/'> I ^ .i .r -t vVvP' ■::',;?^s ■-■ ;■. '"■■• .* ■■;;-> imrr^ •.< •■^‘^r ■>f:, rWater Structures Committee ApriI 11, 19924. Ron Whinnery, Carson's Bay - Draft Order for Dock Lensth VarianceThe Committee received the Findings and Order regarding the application by Ronald G. Whinnery. 19780 Cottagewood Road. Deep- haven, for a length variance to allow construction and mainte nance of a 511 foot dock across a wetlands to reach open naviga ble water. MOTION: Foster moved, Grathwol seconded, to recommend approval of the Order and attached Memorandum granting Ronald Whinnery, 19780 Cottagewood Road, Deephaven, a variance from the requirements of the LMCD Code in accordance with the plan submit ted . VOTE: Motion carried, Rascop voting nay 5.Multiple Dock License Renewals A. Renewals Without Change MOTION: Grathwol moved, Cochran approval of the following renewal without 1992 with orders, stipulations: 1. Baycliffe Property Owners Assn., 2. Wayzata Yacht Club, Site 1 and 2 to a valid Conditional Use Permit being of Wayzata VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. seconded, to recommend change applications for Smithtown Ba.v , Wayzata Bay sul)ject in effect from the City B. Renewals With Change: 1. Curly's Minnetonka Marina, Inc.Lower Lake South the west Thibault reported that when Curly’s dock was inspected in summer of 1991 it was determined that the 15 slips on the side do not conform to the licensed site plan on file. A new certified survey was submitted 4/2/92 indicating encroachment into the City of Tonka Bay’s fire lane DUA. The new survey confirmed that the slips on the west side are larger than those shown on the 1977 survey. A side setback variance was granted 9/28/78 on the west side, addressing the encroachment into the City of Tonka Bay’s fire lane DUA. Attorney James Penberthy. representing Curly’s Marina, submitted a copy of the Tonka Bay City Council minutes showing their approval of the encroachment. He will supply a certified copy. The new survey also shows a 10’ section of dock including slip #132 on the far eastern dock structure extends beyond 200’. According to Attorney LeFevere the dock is eligible for grandfa thering if it existed when it was licensed with the exception of the portion which extends beyond 200’. This 10’ section is shown within the 200’ line on the 1977 survey. This section, according to the owner Gordon Koch is an integral part of the dock struc ture. Remov ing the section would weaken the dock, and ni'Ming the pilings will be difficult. • » 1 % a 1 4 i Itr^ Ig .•St ri\ iifinlfs»,n ®mi:Jpi-. feiW'M/ ft##® Me,^' W •' Water Structures Coromittee April 11, 1992 Foster suggested accepting the dock configuration according to the as-built survey. Then in the future if there is mainte nance to the dock, the section beyond 200’ would be removed. Babcock suggested giving a time frame in which to remove the dock section. MOTION: Rascop moved, Grathwol seconded, to recommend renewal of Curly's Minnetonka Marina, Inc., Multiple Dock License according to the Schoell & Madson. Inc. survey submitted 4/2/92 with the stipulation that within five years, or sooner if mainte nance is done, the dock section on the east side which extends beyond the 200’ line is to be removed. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. pas- *v 2. Minnetonka Yacht Club, Site 1, Carson’s Bay At the 3/14/92 meeting the committee recommended approval for the MYC to relocate 3 service slides at Site 1 to three new dock slips on a 40’ dock extension. Subsequently, legal counsel questioned exchanging slide storage for dock slip storage. Therefore the MYC amended their application leaving the slide storage as previously licensed. Thomas Maple, representing the MYC, explained the amended application and the logistics of the barge and pontoon boats. The MYC current license covers 3 locations: Lighthouse Island, W Site 3; Carson’s Bay, Site 1; and Bug Island, Site 2. Under the /'amended application the barge at Site 1 would be changed from a '■ r «tie-on to a 10’ X 20’ slip (#35), with dock on three sides, attached to an existing wooden dock on the southeast side. A / • *’se boat storage slip (#6) at Site 3 would be transferred t^ 12’ X 24’ slip (#36) at Site 1 adjacent to slip #35. Slip #36 would be used for the pontoon boat. It would have dock on three sides for safety in loading and unloading passengers. 1# Maple explained the barge is used to from shore to the island. MOTION; Babcock moved, Foster renewal of the Minnetonka Yacht Club the following change in configuration would be changed from a tie on to a dock on three sides, attached to the southeast. Service boat slip #6 at 12’ X 24’ slip at Site 1. #36. on transfer supplies and fuel seconded, to recommend the Multiple Dock License with The storage of the barge 10’ X 20’ slip, #35, with existing wood dock on the Site 3 to be transferred to a the southeast corner next to three sides. The existing unlicensed pipe -T.1. -< Slip #35, with dock on is *0 be removed. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. 3. Sailor’s World Marina & Yacht Club, Inc., Smith’s Bay MOTION: Babcock moved. Rascop seconded, to recommend ap proval of the new ownership and new name. Sailor’s World Marina & Yacht Club, Inc., 1992 Multiple Dock License, formerly Shoreline Marina & Yacht Club, with new manager, John Vogt. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. r- ■■ te:: W&m} y •. .'U-.Water Structures Committee April 11, 1992m4. Wayzata Yacht Club - District Mooring Area 9i. ^IvC- MOTION: Cochran moved, Grathwol seconded, to recommend approval of the Wayzata Yacht Club District Mooring Area license renewal with a minor change in the District Mooring Area layout as directed by the Wayzata City Council in July, 1990. and shown on the Site Plan "Exhibit A" (1991 amendment). VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. C. Non-renewing, Paid $25 Fee to Hold in Abeyance S4''' W MOTION: Babcock moved, Slocum seconded, to hold in abeyance the following Multiple Dock Licenses with payment of a $25 fee: 11 Presbyterian Homes on Lake Minnetonka, Spring Park Bay New name and owner - formerly Lakeshore Village Apartments. 2. Mai Tai Restaurant, Excelsior Bay VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. D. \l'r - Pending Application 1« Forest Arms Improvement Association for fyfW- ■Ji : ...W The Forest Arms Improvement Association has mnde application a change in configuration with increases in slip sizes on a non-conforming grandfathered structure. 1:16' density. The approved plan shows 14 slips, 5 @ 12’ x 32’. 5 w 12’ x 24*. 4 (f 10* X 16*. The four 16* slips are perpendicular to the walkway to the main dock. The proposed plan shows elimination of the four slips on the walkway, with 6 slips 10’ x 32’ and 8 slips ® ft' 00m ■'.r.* ■ m t:' mm M. T''^;r €&■... 10’ X 24* on the main dock. Babcock reviewed a letter from LMCD Attorney Charles LeFe- vere dated 4/8/92. The letter points out that LMCD Code allows only minimal increases in slip sizes. LeFevere comments that in this case the increase in the size of some of the slips is clear ly substantial. He does not recommend approving increased slip sizes requested on the application. Lynn Adams. President, Forest Arms Improvement Association, spoke to the reasons for their request for a change in configura tion and slips sik:es. The Association wishes to eliminate the four slips on the walkway because their use conflicts with the swimmers at the beach as well as a neighbor’s beach. There is a desire to increase the size of the slips to accommodate canopies and pontoon boats. Adams submitted a worksheet showing a de crease in square footage of water area and dock area coverage, hopies of letters to the Association from Thibault and their responses along with copies of LMCD Resolution No. 76 and Ordi nance 115. It is the Association’s contention that their license is based on 24 Watercraft Storage Units and as long as they maintain that number the configuration should be incidental. ■imm 1 #1,^ r- ■M ■'Z-'i II i II I -s; l^i,?.'! '■:• .;F^#l*£e .Water Structures Committee 'll- ■. -.w;: m*: i-:- ■ :-V, V , - ^mi-- V m • vv; ®K:' atm.:-.- ii; SMM-% !«»«« ■&: : 'feck- $^kw.>y Sc : ' ■'?c rsr:4. : ■; ■' ‘S?»h •■; ■ ■ .,v4' - tiy^ \. m-.- ’ .m- ■.; '*.*■ ->5. V. . i-- ^U:r>.y . ,-■my cC' V- V . • ' .?!• *.• ' !*- •. *» • April 11, 1992Babcock pointed out that the Association is licensed for a grandfathered, non-conforming multiple dock. The LMCD Code does no. allow an increase in slip size without losing the grandfathered status through a new dock license application. The in creases in slip sizes proposed by the Association are not minor in nature. Should the Association pursue the change it would have to apply for a new multiple dock license. It would have to comply with the current Code which would allow four restricted watercraft at this site, based on 22C ’ of shoreline. Greg Keller, attorney for the Forest Arms Improvement Asso- member of the association, spoke in Keller e.xpressed his opinion that the more than a method of determining the fee to be charged. He believes it has an effect on the density on Lake Minnetonka. In the proposed plan the number of WSUs is reduced and therefore an asset to the Lake. Babcock presented a proposal for a minor change taking into consideration the 220’ of shoreline, for the 14 slips with 20’ ciation and Sue Dorgoske, favor of the application. Watercraft Storage Unit is side set backs. He proposed 5 @ 12’ .x 32 10’ X 16* all opening toward the Lake. Adams do not want to give up any claim for the 24 sponded that the LMCD does not license WSUs, configuration and slip size. Dongoske noted they decrease the size of 10 slips for an increase in (» 10’ X 24’ and 4 @ responded that they WSUs. Babcock re- the license is for are offering to 4. f ■ y ■ m'y r'- Adams said they appreciate the suggestion Babcock made, but it is important to them to keep the 24 WSUs. There was a discussion of the dock cc.ifiguration. Questions were raised about the location of the various finger lengths and how the slip size would be measured if a 16’ were next to a 24'. Babcock said the actual layout of the dock will have to be worked out with staff. MOTION: Rascop moved, Grathwol seconded, to recommend approval of a minor change in configuration for Forest Arms Improvement Association, moving the four slips on the walkway to the main dock with the slip sizes to remain as shown on the original license, stressing there is to be no increase iri slip size, details to be worked out with staff according to the dis cussion. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. 5.B.I. Bean’s Greenwood Marina Multiple Dock License Renewal Application. The committee received a report from Thibault reviewing the status of the Marina. Attached were drawings showing the 1986 status and a current configuration. The report recommends slips 80-82 be maintained at 12’ x 32’, with slip 79 relocated to its former position next to #80. The other five slips involved may be relocated within the 100’ zone at the owner’s discretion. Thibault p|‘esented an overhead view of the marina. There was discussion with James Bean, owner, as to the configuration discrepancies. ' Bean said he disagrees with the 12’ x 32’ size for slip #82 which extends beyond 100’. Bean contends he had administrative permission in 1985 to move slip #79 to slip #S2’s location. Increasing the size of #82 to 40*. wm < -*.. .Water Structures Committee April 11. 1992p dime n- 1icensed Rascop said an as-built survey is necessary with si sions. Cochran added it should be a survey signed by a surveyor. MOTION: Grathwoi moved, Rascop seconded, to recommenil approval of the Bean’s Greenwood Marina Multiple Dock License for 1992 with a minor change, allowing a 40’ slip at #80 and changing #82 to 32’ to conform to the 100’ zone, with #79, 99. 100, 105, 106 and 107 to be relocated within the 100’ zone. The motion was discussed at length. Babcock suggested conceptual approval subject to an as-built survey that shows the entire dock dimensioned with slip numbers. The motion was withdrawn. MOTION: Babcock moved, Grathwoi seconded, that staff work with the applicant to determine slip locations and slip sizes for all slips within the marina, conforming to the grandfathered license as to slip size, and then resul)tnit for committee review. Upon committee and board review and recommendation, applicant would then be authorized to reconfigure the dock, subject to verification of a signed and registered as-built survey. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. -r f fr •>: •.i" S.0.2. Methodist Lakeside Transfer Request of Moorings Slips. No action was taken pending committee review of a draft amendment under No. 8 c.n the agenda. to Dock code 5.D.3. Shorewood Marina & Yacht Club, Gideon’s Bay late was ,' ■ y 1^' .Vi ' At the 3/25/92 Board meeting the request to waive the fee for Shorewood Yacht Club, currently under receivership, denied. The executive director reported receipt of the license application fee without tne late fee. A subsequent verbal request by the applicant again appealed for waiver of the late fee. The executive director further pointed out that there were circumstances in this case where the owner allowed the license ren"iwal to lapse, leaving the burden of the late fee on the mortgagee once it was discovered the license was not renewed. He did point that there are also two other marinas which have not renewed their licenses, now subject to late lees. Rascop said Shorewood Yacht Club should be advised there the board action. There was no further action. is no change from 6.Deicing Licenses A. New License Applications to recommend ap- ‘I is.,? MOTION: Foster moved. Cochran seconded, proval of the following new deicing license applications: Michael Kramer. 5425 Timber Lane. Shorewood, Gideons Day Ed Yaeger, 5445 Timber l.ane, Shorewood, Gideons Bay Excelsior Bay Associates, 603 l.ake St., Excelsior. E.xcelsior Bay. VOTE: Motion carried. Grathwoi abstaining. r,Plife •'•f' . f’i v;<;:.‘’•>.v.r^''■Ir?.- V*-pfs^« I9^?.J»:Pmm4Mi w^vi§'rs-; mki? n- iilfe^r.i ‘■■V mm^ik:rife-- ■^ •• ••• M Mh ^w- £fev- mmh mpMi^ :S#RM V ii't I'M'' - ■ 'V¥?'' ' :■ -Vi>'^' « ' ife ;V .' !> «iA SSS- . fe&i.I4-. Water Structures CommitteeB. End of Season Deicing Permits April 11, 1992 The Committee received a memo from Thibault recommending a provision for deicing from March 15 through April 20. which would waive fencing requirements except along the shore. The recom mended fee is $50. ... , jn f h,»Grathwol said there is considerable deicing started in the spring. There should be a different treatment of spring deicing vs. winter or all season deicing. Fencing on the Lake should not be required because it would not be safe to go on the ice. H would support some kind of minimal control of springtime <^ejcing. The executive director suggested a special fee schedule lor * ■ _ __ _ _ _short “term'‘5pring’d^icingr Lig'hting and thin ice signs posted on concern about incurring a liability if nothing is done. MOTION: Babcock moved. Grathwol seconded, to coni unit to require a deicing license with the $125 fee. shore signage required, eliminating the need for fencing and signs on the ice. The motion was withdrawn. Foster suggested allo»ing =P^ing deicing with a re suggested that up until licensing requirements, would have to have tlie out beyond the deicing number of thin ice signs on the ice. Me March 15 any deicing should require full After that date anyon.i starting to deice large thin ice signs placed on shore and ®*'®*‘moTION; Babcock moved. Grathwol secomled. ^ ordinance change to allow the executive director, after March J-. to issue deicing permits, as differentiated from a license, pro viding for shoreline signage. nnno<;esCochran added that the permits be for registration paipo.ses MOT I ON * Grathwol moved, K a s c o p seconded, to t a h j e ^ ^ mo'-.on Jick to the committee. Motion carried, slocu.e and Cochran voting nay. C. Consideration of Licenses Code Amendment on Issuance of Deicing The committee received a memo 1 rom ThibnuU V"'; ' executive director be authorized to isfrue new deicing liccnaes ^mout Board approval. The reason is ‘‘ “'’V' fJ sudden fall freeze, such as occurred in November, 1991. . ?or deicing is immediate. The license could be subjec to card approval. Another suggestion is to allow renewa1 without hoard approval if there were no violations the previous yeai. , Rascop said if the Board does not ‘ .^.^^he boa J d be a report filed at least once a vear. Foster said should be involved. The ^ ^ cu t i ve di^r e-t o r^^couj^d^ license but inform the Board monthly of h i s ,s u e the D a b c o c k J * 51 ;es irig ’‘.v ■•:•• 'i-i i »f - '^'to Water Structures Committee April 11, 1992mmw^ ■ l-^-i ■% j: '-' said the Board should take action at sciJic point, Foster suggested changing it from a license to a permit. Grathwoi mentioned that this is only one of a number of items wfiich could have sub committee study. MOTION: Foster moved, Grathwoi seconded, to table the discussion to staff. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. iiS-iS0-' fei# ■ ■ 7. Restricted vs. Non-restricted Watercraft, Slides and Off-Lake Storage ^5^ pjs 1#» NOTION: Foster moved, Rascop seconded, to table the discus sion with instruction to staff to re-distribute Attorney LeFe- vere’s 3/20/92 letter with the ne,xt regular packet. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. fSW.8. Draft of Ordinance to Allow Transfer of Storage from a Dis trict Mooring Area License to a Multiple Dock License. mi tpfvSvf.. " tilMMi ■%M ' ‘v. • / •’P, • .pB=:te: 'A: Kf ■::pto §im*i iKK;: The Committee received a Draft of An Ordinance Relating to District Mooring Areas; Amending L.MCD Code Section 20 J. Babcock suggested the following changes: Subd. 9. to read: Conversion to Docks. Licens?d District mooring arf a spaces . . . '• 3 wjrd ’’slip” in c, e and g to be changed to "dock", c to read: Dock spaces created shall be no larger than I 1 i 24 \ Add h) District Mooring Areas permit holders existing under ^ this option cannot reconvert to District Mooring Areas. The suggested addition of "h" resulted in discussion involv ing various hypothetical situations v, lere an applicant might wish to convert, partially or in whole, frotii a DMA to Multiple Dock and then later apply for a DMA. That possibility could increase the density without a trade back for dock slips from moorings. Babcock's concern is to find a wording that this conversion would be a one time thing only, MOTION: Babcock moved, Grathwoi seconded, to recommend approval of tha draft Ordinance relating to district mooring areas; amending LMCD Code Section 2.04, with the wording changes as proposed by Babcock and the addition of "h" wiiich is to read that this subdivision applies only to District Mooi ing Arens in existence at date of adoption. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. 9, Amended Draft of Ordinance Relating to Storage of Lake Main tenance Equipment on Lake Minnetonka mm ito' iiJI; to..' The Committee received the revised Ordinance which had its first reading at the 3/25/92 Board meeting. Cochran asked for reconsideration of Subd. 8. d)2l. The current reading limits storage to tlie Dock Use Area. Cochran pointed out that in many cases the setback areas could be used it satisfactory to the adjacent property owners. >. mmMm- ■ ■ -m pi" fe&:%PV iP-pi;^-.. H: [fi /.A’i' >-’’m' fi/i^-r:r ■: ^Wn'^■v:^.x ■ ‘ XL?- • ? ■' »-x 'r- iti^^, iM ' ■ ■«■ •. js«- ■■ >.st:>-.‘ii^': V,.:P;.' - ; ;.5-' iff-"'’- ^ V '"■ • •Water Structures Committee April 11, 1992MOTION: Cochran moved, Slocum seconded, to recommend ap proval of the Draft Ordinance relating tenance equipment on Lake Minnetonka, read: Equipment may be stored with the of the adjacent sites. LeFevere is to rewrite the section. to storage of Section Subd. permission of lake iiiain- 8d)2) to the owner VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. 10. Draft of Code Amendments Recommended by Procedures Subcommittee the Policies and MOTION: Grathwol moved, Slorum seconded, to recommend approval of An Ordinance Relating to Low Water Variances; Docks in Excess of 100 Feet; Multiple and Coimiurcial Dock License; and Permanent Docks; .Amending LMCD Code Sections 1.0.. 2.06. VOTE: Motion carried u-'an i mous 1 y . 2.01, 2.oj and 11. Lake Inspection Tour the annual June start at Mound, for a boat . Its lake The 1 o c a - Babcock asked for suggestions for inspection tour. Rascop asked that it executive director said he has to arrange tion may determine the starting point. He will know by the next meeting. Cochran suggested looking at the trouble spots winch seem to be recurring. Rascop suggesting viewing the pioposed milfoil SONAR test site. He also suggested viewing building heights under Shoreland Ordinance review by the Technical Rtview Committee. Halstead Bay wetland dredging proposal for the Carl son Properties development was also suggested. Kascop wou a .so like to view the long docks which have been built over wetlands in Carson’s Bay. (These docks are accessible by small boats only. ) 12. Deposit Refunds MOTIO ■: Grathwol moved. Rascop seconded, to recommend approval of the deposit refund of $100 for the application by Ed Yaeger, 5445 Timber Lane, Shorewood, Gideons Bay. . . IVOTE: Motion carried unanimously. 2. Minnetonka Boat Works Request Babcock returned to the request of Minnetonka Boat Works for permission to expand sales at a dock console the sales console would require amendments to Code Sec. ...uj, Subd. 11 and Sect. 2.12 Subd. 2, 6 and 12. Cochran noted that it would not be possible ‘5® procedures necessary 1 amend the Code and have the icquest honored this year. Grathwol noted there are provi^.ions for -cont inued ii Z'- '. HPi •t ■> i . ft _ MLa Jis '* . ^ -V*'/*. - - srfim ■:i.VV - .S-'li Water Structures Committeecabana type consoles for the sale of fuel.Aril 11, 1992 teS' ■•iii^ Foster said he does not believe the current ordinance serves the public, since it prohibits the selling of ice. The e.xecutive director noted soft drink machines are now in use contrary to Code provisions. Foster said it is not necessary to have a building, just a method of locking up the wares. There was no action at this time. 13. Sales From Commercial Docics ice . i,-, “ar'iiL,*l: ;<v. ' ' - ^iT., ■■•A The executive director noted the existence of soft drink and machines on some marina docks. Staff has not enforced the Ordinance based on earlier comments questioning this Code provi sion. He asked if staff should send a letter to the marinas advising them the Ordinance does not allow such dock sales while the subject is under review. Foster did not agree with writing a letter. Grathwol suggested looking at the matter before taking any action. MOTION: Babcock moved, Grathwol seconded, to recommend that the current Ordinance regarding sales be enforced for 1992. It was suggested it would be inappropriate to begin enforce ment at this time without a review. MOTION: Foster moved, Grathwol seconded, to table the discussion. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. Ad j o u r nme n t Rascop moV( miv .. journed. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 12:10 pm. Rascop moved. Babcock seconded, that the meeting be ad- FOR THE COMMITTEE: ’:<z ^^^l■■li'■;.Fugene St roinmen il^^ijxecutive Director ;-4# ' •J ■ ifefi#-pry . j?;/ mm ,-.r in S'’*-*'msi m4 r-- •Tt’-. '.<r'‘s <•/, ■ Suburtaan Hennepin Regionol Park District 12615 CounV Wood 9 . fV»»U»V MN 56441-1248 ‘'1|^>ie»phon* (612) 559-9000 fOR (612)55^^7 Board of Commissioners Judlh&Andenon Chet ttoortingiDn Ncholai P. Eoiarr MoaCholr BrodUyn Center Sunn Nelun Bo«r Oyital ShMeyA. Bontne Mope non OmiOl J. OotifeKMiMi e.*louiiPart( i MWW Edna Jornn M. IMHIe Onno ODuam P. Btyad P^'^yJt eertnlendenia, MQm ■ '" ‘ liifi 35 \!\.i - ■K'u?;: •- mm -"V"':- A". i '-ycr ''iO 1 APR 2 2 1992 April 20. 1992 TO: FROM: City Manager/City Clerk/City Administrator Robert M. Wicklund, Directorflr WDepartment of Administration RE:Hennepin Parks Redistricting The Board of Commissioners of the Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District (Hennepin Parks) will be holding a Public Hearing on Proposed Redistricting of Hennepin Parks Conmlrsloner Districts on Nay 7, 1992 In the Board Room of the Hennepin Parks Administrative Office. 12615 County Road 9, Plymouth. The purpose of the hearing Is to receive comments regarding the proposed Commissioner election districts required by the results of the 1990 census. The proposed redistricting Is to be In effect for the 1992 election. Enclosed are four options for redistricting which have been adopted by the Board for presentation at the public hearing. He would appreciate It If you would post this Information In your City Hall so as to Inform any residents who may be Interested In attending the hearing. I* anyone has any questions concerning redistricting, they should be directed to call me at 559>6752. Thank you for your cooperation. j HECYCLEO PAPER - Conserving Our Resources "v An EomoI Qppo^unlty Empic J bt;. -r -TTr-- , - itf''^ 1^ fef i ,’■ pp--. / SUBURBAN HENNEPIN REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT COMMISSIONER DISTRICTS mmr fllliIB*- iliiil"-?'® ■;'.’.>.>v"'v ■»■ .......................... iKiP .- 'V:ji?W:4rX;yv''?^:S y'- -V ^*.;:..-,r^J; ■.'.;my- -:' #> Ife. P=- V .'P -' :-r-' lajS-:,.,- . p-" ■ 'M^ppyly y\yp-: ISitM m > V 7*V Lorttto HENNEPIN Medina li Plyiaoutti Ma»ia Plain Antnony J Lanfl Lake Orona L Matfleina Laha Wayiata Minnairiata Moand ;-r ,-:.r . ,fp '- tt. ■•iiifaeiua waadlan# Minnataniia ■aaen Sarlng Park Tanka lay Qrtanwaad laealtl*# Ulnnatanka Oaanhaean Moaklna 1 Gaidan vaiiay MiMiaatalla fe K: y;V. *■ N«w CommittiOMr OIttrIctt w«r« ••MlltiMct by Rttoiutiofi of tho Porti Olitrict loorb on Oooombor S. IMS. purtuont to Lopiolotlon ioiootf by tho IMS LogiMturo. ConwHMionort oloetod it IM MOfil ilwitlnn from Ofotrteti ^ ^ 4-yoor tormo. thoio fromM wf..wa ----------- Ofotrleti 2 and 4 aonro 2-yoif tonoo- Wf'- 'ty. « All af Crvatalla laOlatrlat t iSsiP^ mmiMsm■; ^(L--' .■ I1 il I % I ■I '4 ^0$£-fcaw^ ;■’? , p55ps. mm- • ■'- > • V; Mrnm.: DISTRICI-L cm 'mm^ -i 'GhampHn ^rcoran Dayton Grttnflald Wi- mmx 'P'' ' ■ Hassan Indtptndtncf Lorftto Naplt Grovt Hiplt Plain Hfdina Hadicint LaKt Nt« Hopt Ossto Plymouth Rockford g'■'•m.p poptrs ...... .^^wrotai PtSTRICT 2 cm fcAiPtrystal p3 Brooklyn Centtr tefcfeia:'Robblnsdkl* ■JSK:,:. ;.f ; '-a St. Anthony Total pa^«gfciisr V? -''P-P •■ g‘i-^.n£<v ■ ■•-.I-g DISTRICT 3 city P»:,'. iSlIEt'l Edina Goldtn Vallty St. Louis Park aSiSL:- ■.::;??■ ^.. • ^r-3' 'M Total 3452C/72 ■u t: .V PARK CQMNISSIQNgfl DISTRICTS (Takan from 1980 Ctnsus) Population 9.006 4.2S2 4.000 1.391 248 1,766 2.640 297 20.525 1.421 2.623 419 23.087 2.974 31.615 380 __£52 107,296 PoouUtl 2S.S43 31.230 43.332 14.422 S.619 120.146 Populatt< 46.073 22.775 42^11 111.779 DISTRICT 4 \1 cm Poaulitm ::1 • Chanhassan 8 1 Ottphavtn 3.7T6 \ Edan Pralrla 16.263 ; Excalslor 2.523 1 Graanwood 653 j Hopkins 15.336 1 Long Laka 1,747 j Hinnatonka 38,683 Minnatonka Baach 575 jHinnatrlsta3.236 1Mound9.280 Orono 6.845 1St. Bonafaclus 857 j Shorauood 4.646 Spring Park 1,465 ■i Tonka Bay 1.354 f >. / Nayzata 3,621 'BM Wood1 and _526 1 Total 111.334 •1 DISTRICT 5 - cm .'f Bloomington 81.831 :J Ft. Snalling 223 V:. Richflald 37.861 ■ Total ns.MS •1 I H .tfjfkakUaiUi^ !;► f:- I i Ir-t, i ■ : k !I I'f. §' ^t' I* Pi: # w lflL..‘- P- ki'W t\ mm- m §■ W i ■ S; ■' 7 i >• b,,-' Lf- ' ' ?-^.- A' .Sr^ . fC®. ■p-': iv. P^- ■'v- tI f- conyiissiONeR oisiRia i COmiSSIONER OISTRia 2 COlylllSSIONER DISTRICT 3 COlylllSSIONER DISTRICT 4 COMIIISSIONER DISTRICT 5 M.-’ ^■;- ... /■pv-DISTRICT ] CItY WP0> ^:<-.V‘-, pp^ 'i-h •- •Mw. •>- K •.•& Champ11n Corcoran Dayton Greenfield Hanover Hassan Independence Loretto Maple Grove Maple Plain Medina Medicine Lake Osteo Plymouth Rockford Rogers Mayzata KSsv ^®‘*'mmmsmmA DISLTR1C1L2 ;;ii ifeaSlS'^SV»(V.f;<a?, : t4r %'v “V;»'' . I0pmm- ■ ., -’ 'I’-rm ■...'.. PARK COMMISSIONER DISTRICTS: OPTION A (Taken from 1990 Census) DISTRICT 4 'iV^'’:', -i.^‘Wmx~-- - - City ■♦' ■■ Population cm Brooklyn Center 28.887 Bloomington Brooklyn Park 56.381•Ft. Snelling Crystal 23.783 Richfield Robblnsdale 14.396 St. Anthony 5.278 Total Total 128.730 DISTRICT 3 Total Population Arithmetic Average cm Population Acceptable Range 119 Edina 46.070 Option A Golden Valley 20.971 Largest District New Hope 21.853 Smallest District St. Louis Park 43J82 Difference Total 132,681 PQDUlat1( 06.335 97asLzm 122.142 664.048 132.809 144.400 12M42 22.258 ■■. 3452C/73 ^R^SSS##is¥':,, i?SW 1 Population cm Population 16,849 Chanhassan 0 5,199 Deephaven 3.653 4.392 Eden Prairie 39,311 1,450 Excelsior 2,367 269 Greenwood 614 : 1.951 Hopkins 16,534 2,822 Long Lake 1,984 1 404 Minnetonka 48.370 ! 1 38,736 Minnetonka Beach 573 i 2.005 Minnetrlsta 3,439 3.096 Mound 9,634 385 Orono 7,285 2,704 St. Bonafaclus 1,180 ■ V' 1 50,889 Shorewood 5,917 *{ 440 Spring Park 1,571 1 i 698 Tonka Bay 1,472 i 3.806 Woodland 496 j i 136,095 Total 144,400 ] DISTRICT 5 •. • . V r te. w. w rIPT.r vV iS;t P:I' I'i.^ Si't-!' S ■P9^. Ssr, i ef'.' ■.I;;- %::r p. k k'-y- rl:»p.W: &P‘ m- >•" ';f* • '-■ ■••:•’ .'- it ':5r3r;vl. ■ W Iff: '9 P' IfI I ^ COMMISSIONER OISTRia 1 COMMISSIONER DISTRICT Z COM4ISSIONER DISTRICT 3 COMMISSIONER DISTRICT 4 COMMISSIONER DISTRICT 5 IP-'-Ip ®-r - • ■ rvv pl>w%- >, i®5-'M' ?•' ■’’ ' V ' ■' ' ‘ DISTMCT 2 ’H •. any s Brooklyn Centtr Brooklyn Park Chaaplln Crystal Robblnsdale Total '•'. . .. ‘I'T .• DISTRICT 3 eARK CQWWISSI (Taken DISTRICT 1 City PoDulatlon Corcoran 5,199 Dayton 4,392 Greenfield 1,450 Hanover 269 Hassan 1,951 Independence 2,822 Loretto 404 Maple Grove 38,736 Maple Plain 2,005 Medina 3,096 Medicine Lake 385 Mew Hope 21,853 Osseo 2,704 Plymouth 50,889 Rockford 440 Rogers 698 Total 137,293 Population 28.887 56.381 16.849 23.788 14.396 140,301 pQPulatl DISTRICT 4 City Chanhassan Oeephaven Eden Prairie Excelsior Greenwood Long Lake Minnetonka Minnetonka Beach Minnetrlsta Mound Orono St. 8on1fac1us Shorewood Spring Park Tonka Bay Hayzata Hoodland Total DISTRICT 5 City Bloomington Ft. Snelling Richfield St. Anthony Total pQDulatl 0 3,653 39,311 2,367 614 1,984 48.370 573 3.439 9,634 7,285 1,180 5,917 1,571 1,472 3,806 496 131,672 PoDulat1< 86,335 97 35,710 iJUA 127,420 Total population 664,048 Arithmetic average 132,809 Acceptable range 119,528-146,089 \ OmSilLl Edina 46,070 Largest District 140,301 Goldeii Valley 20,971 Smallest District 127.362 Hopkins 16,534 Difference 12,939 St. Louis Park 43.7.87 Total 127,362 * 3452C/74 , M ii iI ■It .1:^ V! < % .4 . ] ! OOMilSSIONER OISTRia I tlMlISSI(>€R OISTRia 2 OOlillSSIONER OISTRia 3 OOMIISSIONER OISTRia 4 OOMIISSIONER OISTRia S 1 1111 1 n 1 rxxyX3 fef Nf' -If'Si !• IsJftS-/. bJ^* Vv>- - ^ IM^- ., V V-' vV • V . •• •■> mm • ■ Rf*?J. ■y'"- w'* ' •- W#-v§. •liN t ” * • V.’’' c im0r V tec¥tA;v.A:--, Hv^;# &0rr^' l^0:vs^a: •'>■■"•’ ^ ,- ,r‘t ■ - fe|lif??'e' ^ Vf.-^ Mm (Taken from 1990 Census) DISTRICT 1 DISTRICT 3 cm Population cm PoDulatlon Champ11n 16,049 Golden Valley 20.971 Corcoran 5,199 Hopkins 16,534 Dayton 4,392 Medicine Lake 385 Daaphaven 3.653 Plymouth 50,889 Excelsior 2,367 St. Louis Park 43.787 Greenfield 1,450 Greenwood 614 Total 132,566 Hanover 269 Hassan 1,951 Independence 2,822 Lon9 Lake 1,984 DISTRICT 4 Loretto 404 Maple Grove 38,736 City PjaaulftLflpMaple Plain 2,005 Medina 3,096 Chanhassen 0 Minnetonka Beach 573 Eden Prairie 39,311 Hinnetrlsta 3,439 Edina 46,070 Mound 9,634 Minnetonka 48.370 Orono 7,285 Osseo 2,704 Total 133,751 Rockford 440 Rogers 698 DISTRICT 5 St. Bonifaclus 1,180 Shorewood 5,917 CItY PflPiLUtlOflSpring Park 1,571 Tonka Bay 1,472 Bloomington 86,335 Nayzata 3,806 Fort Snelling 97 Moodland 496 Richfield 35,710 St. Anthony ■ 5^78Total125,006 i Total 127,420 ■■ *,'. DISTRICT 2 Total population 664,048 Arithmetic average 132,809cmPopulationAcceptable range 119,528>146,089 Brooklyn Center 28,837 Brooklyn Park 56,381 OctIon C Crystal 23,788 Largest District 145,305 New Hope 21,853 Smallest District 125.006 Robblnsdale 14.396 Difference 20,299 ifei-Total 145.305 WSm 3452C/74 vy ... , •- ■'i‘.- _c\• 9^ . 1 « 1 's1 1 1^ i I *5 PARK COMMISSIONER DISTRICTS: OPTION F (Tak»n from 1990 Census) • • • DISTRICT 1 DISTRICT 3 cm Population cm Population Deephaven 3,653 Golden Valley 20,971 Excelsior 2,367 Crystal 23,708 Greenfield 1.450 Hopkins 15,534 Greenwood 614 New Hope 21,853 Hanover 269 St. Lou’s Park 42.787 Independence 2,822 Long Lake 1,984 Total 126.933 Loretto 404 Maple Grove 38,736 Maple Plain 2,005 Medina 3,096 DISTRICT 4 Medicine Lake 385 Minnetonka Beach 573 City Population Minnetrlsta 3,439 Mound 9,634 Chanhassen 0 Orono 7,285 Eden Prairie 39,311 Plymouth 50,889 Edina 46.070 Rockford 440 Minnetonka 48.370 St. Bonifaclus 1,180 Shorewood 5,917 Total 133,751 Spring Park 1,571 Tonka Bay 1.472 DISTRICT 5 Wayzatu 3,806 Hoodland 496 CUY Population Total 144.047 Bloomington 86,335 Fort Snelling 97 Richfield 35.710 DISTRICT 2 St. Anthony . 5.^fl Total 127,420cmPopulation Brooklyn Center 28.887 Brooklyn Park 56,381 Champ11n 16,849 Total population 664.048 Corcoran 5,199 Arithmetic average 132,809 Dayton 4,392 Ac:eptable range 119,528 -146,089 Hassan 1,951 Osseo 2,704 Option F Robblnsdale 14,396 Largest District 144.047 Rogers 698 Smallest D1strict 126.933 Difference 17,114 Total 130,759 ,, .1 n-'- •• ■ • •■ .:■■■-; - . ■ • -t I -.•VP--fv\ m-i ’:..k& rw'. t r^:#' ,:>,/■c. ti: ■“f ‘ V‘"' ,i": itA.; r:. •,vi-’ I ■:^r s 1» > ^1# '?v ’7i' '..V . ■fr !'■ " kr V C^ h'«V> t». ‘S'- »,vv f-'. Audubon Wetlainds Workshop APS 2 4 la32 11 Saturday May 16,1992 ? I ;y V P-v-’f»i?PiA 8:30 am to 4:00 pm l|;kV:»\i \i: i u Eastman Nature Center (in the Elm Creek Park Reserve) i' The Minnesota Audubon Council will present a special workshop on wetland protection in northwestern L.^nnepin County. The workshop is designed to teach people about wetlands in their community, the impacts of land use on those wetlands, and the ways that wetlands can be protected. A panel oi. wetland professionals will provide information on local, state, and federal laws. Citizen activists will discuss different approaches people can uce to protect wetlands in their community. The workshop fee is $10.00, and includes a bag lunch and workshop materials. The public is welcome. Advance registration is required. To register contact: Ms. Jo Ellen Worlin 2138 Centerview Lane Mound, Minnesota 55364 Phone #: 472-1481 ! if*- i m&. wcy^->ter' HI-. if "• ’■%-.iv'- . •,%P . • ■ . mm-- ^riP-vkm ter.:K'f ■ ■■ ** 1%, '^' mm rr i- ■ Nrr '. ^ '■ ft?: f;tC * ; .Ji > t'„ •m.:r ■' mn.- '• trm m-'. 0} ■■ .‘ :'>rrM:0m uf-- ■ fti- ■ rri^iLv- National Audubon Society Minnesota Audubon Council 1313 Fifth Street S. E., Suite 321 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612) 379-3868 i AF'‘<2 4 April 22, 1992 Ms. Dorothy M. Ha11in Clerk, City of Orono P. O. Box 6G Orono, Minnesota 55323-0066 Dear Ms. Hallin: On the back of this letter is an announcement of a wetlands workshop sponsored by the Minnesota State Office of the National Audubon Society. I respectfully request that you post this in a public place. I appreciate your cooperatio*: in this matter. If you have any questions you may contact me at (612) 649-5787. Chair, Wetlands Workshop Committee . k i^- i‘ V k I^^V t ■■'■ rv ;.r pi, K-- » %■ \ ilV tl:'Iv'g 'V' ■ Westonka CommunitY -r % Action Network •c 'Emergency Assistance "Meals on Wheels "Rererrob 5600 Lynwood Blvd. Mound. MN 55364 (612) 472-0742 SCRVICCAmU Greenfield Independence Loreflo Maple Plain Minnetonka Beach Minnetrista Mound Rockford Spring Park St. Bonifacius Tonka Bay Western Orono aOARD OF DIRECTORS Cratg Andtrton. ^.wsnsta A $t. Bon Police Ch et Miiy OtVinnty. Westof^a Pooiishetf Coo^&natcr RoMinaiit Fabragt-Sfiydtr, Commufht/ Volu'iteer TomOamMt, Local Bunnossma^^ JaannaOalkiaa, H^asiorJta Pubk, Ubramn Sta¥tKarpHtad, Cs/TiHiuntiy VoLi lisef LanHamH. Mound Poiioa Chef Itogarti Holatt, Scfiof Soaaf Wofkef PhyfHaJtaaan. Mound OfyCounof ValHaiatao* WaiMta imefvanjion PnioctCoofdinatot llaryHuHty, \¥aMonka Adua DasK Educaaon Program Manegof Rotolvaftoii, Paa:y. Good Shagnara Uahaean Church HmJaionkK Maats-C Whaaf$ Cocfdnatof Valliigmia, PannfaisaClodangCoorcanMOf JaffyFlitravrja, Local Bataar Marilyn Rfgv. ML 0»va Socal Acnon Ccmfn^nee t-,v Mehar^ SctMfar, LoalAtlomay Fr.lfiahaelTtgfdar. Pastor, Ouf Lady c' Lake Ctiu^cn Barbara Thom!ofd« Commurifiy V^otunfaar BobTomalka« Cotnmunfy Dih Woodbeck, Local Busrr&ssmjn f.pR 2 7 April 23, i992 Dear Friends, Westonka Community Action Network (WeCAN ) will be luinorin^ community volunteers on Wednesday, April 29 at 2 p.m. in the Westonka Senior Center, 5600 Lynwood Blvd. in Mound. Please join us in honoring the volvanteers who are making such a vital contribution to our communit.v. Please call us at 472- 0742 to let us know if you will be attending. We want to make sure we acknowledge your special contributions to WeCAN too. WeCAN President Margaret Holste will award certificates to the volunteers arid present tiie WeCAN Maurice Trask v^olunteer of the Year Award to the 1992 recipient. Refreshments will be served at 2 p.m., with the awards ceremony at 2:30 p.m. WeCAN's Volunteer of the Year Aw.ird is named after Maurice Trask, a member of Bethel Methodist Ch'.jrch who had a long time history of concern and caring for the poor' and disadvantaged. After his de^th, his widow Li Ilian Trask established the Maurice Trask I'eraorial through Bethel United Methodist Church to honor her husband’s memory. The Trask *'lemorial makes regular contributi'»ns to WeCAN. WeCAN has over 100 volunt-rers working in a variety of programs. Volunteers establish policy and guide the organization as WeCAN boardmembers ana committee members. Volunteers interview applicants for WeCAN s Emergency Assistance Program and the Energy Assxstance Program. Volunteers deliver hot, nutritious meals to the homebound as part of WeCAN's Meals-On-Wheels. Volunteers participate in WeCAN’s Food and Nutrition classes, an ntcr-generational learning program. Volunteers help WeCAN’s office run smoothly by helping with child care, filing, reception and phone work. WeCAN’s office provides space for Pyramid Mental Health Center and Relate Counseling Center’s count-ling for families and individuals, budget counselors from Minnesota Financial Counseling Service, and intake workers from Hennepin County Economic Assistance. . -j Sincerely, Kiki Sonnen IIP ■',■ ■. i •"i *' r^'- - Jr" i^p *• . , ■. / :;.:• :^^.r,.x:x. : f,;^:;;v-v-’-- ..: ^ >;.;;r:^ ;^t (j iJ W.'' :.;:’a£::W’ ¥ mm m¥¥s '■" *«««^ : ■ T- - t^#*-' = I —^ i,t. %lte:-;;-.: ' - ii^L^-- ^, ;J ■■■■ •: ■■■ ■ 'i:M i.< J;'^' ■ aj. ?'■" .. ^11 €isk^mlm ■ ' fc* ‘ '■• •' I