Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
03-23-1992 Council Packet
ppk-c — *'I» *' * • « h *'I- 1V It- V- ,?k-<I- p-;: II s> |, <, ii nr. si I I’ MINDTBS OF TH3 REGULAR ORONC COUNCIL MEETUG HELD MARCH 23, 1992 ROLL The Council met on the above date the followinq members present: Mayor Bi.rbara Peterson, Counci Imen. )ers Gabriel Jabbour, Edward Callahan, and J. Diann Goetten. Mary Butler was absent. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, On-Site Systems Manager Stephen Weckman, City Attorney Tom Barrett, City Engineer Glenn Cook, Poli:e Chief Stephen Sullivan and City Recorder Carcle Haseman. Mayor leterson called the meeting to order at 7:02 P.M. OATH OP OFFICE Police Officer David McNichols did not appear for the oath of office. (#1) YEAR XVIII CDBG FUNDING - CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - 7:05 - 7:20 P.M. - RESOLUTION #3100 Mayor Peterson asked for an update on the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. It was noted that the affidavit of publication was published for the original hearing. Moorse pointed out that the hearing had been continued to allow staff to do some further research for the Council. One of the things looked at since the last meeting was the 15% cap on al location of funding for public service-type activities. There is a 15% cap on the total CDBG allocatioii to the County but that allocation is so large that our little bit of it, if we go over 15% of our specific allocation, is not going to have a huge impact on whether the whole County is still within that 15% cap. Goetten asked if Moorse was advocatina funding for "C" (referring to Moorse's memo of 3/20/92) or not? Moorse answered that it was possible to dj so without having a, substantial impact. Goetten commented that this increase is 100'^. Moorse explained that in his Memo of 3/20/92 he showed letter "C" because the Interfaith Outreach group had a request for $2,000.00 to match a grant. Goetten added that they all had an opportunity to use a $1,000.00 last year, two used it and one didn't. Regarding the 3/20/92 memo she questioned the options and wanted to use some funds for the Park. Mayor Peterson asked for comments from the public regarding this item, hearing none, she closed the public hearing. p.: kr P1^' >r>iur ¥'i?,, ■ ■ i- svi:feP" i“fci, :Sr;v‘', gffi'a:^v r>^ ^■'.v m- %I r ■ p. I MINUTES OP THE REGDI»AR ORONO COUNCIL'MEETING HELD MARCH 23, 1992 CONTIN .ii:0 PUBLIC HEARING - YEAR XVIII CDBG FUNDING - CONT Callahan noted that giving money to Park Planning does not disturb him but in the past there has been a potential amount of money given towards the sewer assessments and if we don't have to allocate all of this right now, he would suggest Plan "B" or partially, to give the $1,000 to WECAN, $1,000 to Westonka, $2,000 to make up the grant money for the Interfaith Outreach, keep the $1,700 for the Park Planning and hold the rest to see if there is somebody that needs it in connection with sewer assessments. Moorse explained that there is eighteen months from June to spend this money and asked if it needed to be allocated by a certain date. Gerhardson explained that it needed to be done by the 30th of March. If certain monies aren’t used, they can be reallocated at another time and ecause there are more options today, you don't have to lose it. Jabbour stated that there should be a deadline for unused funds so the funds can be reallocated and felt that Plan A should be implemented. Mayor Peterson felt that a small portion of the money should be used within the community and that using it for Park Planning is appropriate. Callahan suggested that instead of giving $20,000.00 to Housing Rehabilitation it should be assigned to assessment grants for the Stubbs Bay sewer and next year perhaps there would $40,000.00 to contribute. Moorse interjected that HUD has had some rule changes and won't let it be used for that purpose any more. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3100 for funding from the Year XVIII Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant program as follows: Project Budget Interfaith Outreach Community Partners $ 1,000 Westonka Intervention 1,000 Westonka Community Action 1,000 Housing Rehabilitation 20,000 Park Planning 2,736 Ayes 4, nays 0. (#2) CONSENT AGENDA Goetten removed Items #3, 22, 23, 25 from the consent agenda. Jabbour added Items #7, 9, 10 to the consent agenda. Callahan added Items #11 and 19 to the consent agenda. It was moved by Callahan, seconded bv Mayor Peterson, to approve the Consent Agenda. Ayes 4, nays 0. S;:*'-,: .. ; a■ ■ f:' •;• ■ w I- ^ , rw;- I I1. IB: ■%:■. ■ r ■f;' t. V* F •V /,•■■■■■ f- I !: -1... t:- ■ it- i^- p. !Kfc MINUTES OP THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 23, 1992 CONSENT AGENDA - CONT. Motions for all items adopted by consent agenda will be included in the minutes in their respective numerical order. (#3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES Goetten objected to the reference of "Town Hall Road" on page 7. Moorse suggested that it be referred to as "the frontage road." It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Orono Council held on March 9, 1992, as amended. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#4) INTRODUCTION - AMELIA KROEGER Gerhardson stated thac the West Hennepin Recycling Commission appointed Amelia Kroeger to the position of Coordinator to replace the previous Coordinator who took a ^ob with the City of Plymouth. Kroeger was welcomed by all and spoke about her new position. Mayor Peterson asked Kroeger if she has received calls regarding disposal of household hazardous waste. Kroeger answered that there are many calls regarding hazardous waste and selling aluminum cans-. The closest locations for selling cans are Buffalo and Brooklyn Park. A schedule was handed out and she noted the Goodwill Recycling Day on the calendar. Jabbour asked about motor oil. Kroeger stated that certain stations will collect oil if you change it yourself but that it should not be brought to drop sites. It can be taken to the Recycling Transfer Center in Brooklyn Park. Goetten asked if Kroeger lived in Orono or Maple Plain? Kroeger responded that she lives in Orono with a Maple Plain address. PARK COMMISSION C SNTS Robert Howells, one of the new members of the Park Commission, was present but had no comments to make at this time. PUBLIC O TS Mayor Peterson asked if anyone was present who would like to address the Council. No public comments were made. iv.IPr 1^:- P |v I Ft fec- B';'F*' k" • fe-p' i’-fr F* ■ •• V'" - m s V'- k"' « Bmp ^ ‘ - ,> . . ' •;/:-y , Jpxf I#" 5#-'" ail’ .ft*-*' fC.W,-\'r. .H::- -siAV •m; . . vrr P P h r-"> f■P^,,,... r ■ r;.- V..'-;tv. . , ■'t. ';, ;i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 23, 1992 (*#5) #1457 ALAN CARLSOH, 3140 WATERTOWN ROAD - EXTENSION OF PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION /iPPROVAL - RBSOLOTION #3094 It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3094 approving Application #1457 for Alan Carlson, 3140 Watertown Road, granting extension of preliminary subdivision approval to April 8, 1993. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#6) #1718 DAVID FANSLER, 4180 BATSIDE ROAD - VARIANCE - RBSOLUTIOH #3095 David Pansier was present. Moorse explained that the request was for construction of a home with a 75* setback variance rather than 100' from the front yard property line because of steep topography. Weckman added that this was approved by the Planning Commission now and in 1990. He presented a topographic map showing the area. Goetten asked if a mound system would be able to accommodate an eight bedroom. Weckman responded that it didn't have to as this was a five bedroom home and that the application made in 1990 was for the initial design of an eight I .iroom home. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Resolution #3095 approving Application #1718 for Davis Pansier, 4180 Bayside Road, for a variance to permit the construction of a principal dwelling 75* from the front lot line. Ayes 4, nays 0. Pansier added that he planned to put in a nonrental apartment for a mother-in-law and will be on the docket at a subsequent meeting. (*#7) #1719 HENRY BRANTINGHAM, 3185 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3096 Henry Brantingham was present. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3096 approving Application #1719 for Henry Brantincham, 3185 Sixth Avenue North, to permit the construction of an addition to the existing residence. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#8) #1720 CITY OF ORONO, FOX STREET (SECTION LOCATED BETWEEN ORONO ORCHARD AND BROWN ROAD SOUTH) - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3097 Moorse explained that this application would enable placing material along Fox Street between Orono Orchard Road and South Brown F^oad f- P i &■:m.--: ^-' IL: ■1 S';: '. wa ^ r- i: S-- f. I fa.-if'^Bv;V '^;5*s ■- I*'t Iti&- » fr I-??<i V!-. Pl If.^i.. fa MIHUTBS OP THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 23, 1992 ZONING PILE #1720 - CONT. basically adding shoulders to: 1) widen roadway to make it safer and 2) to protect it from the high water levels. Goetten asked what the width would be. Gerhardson responded that the typical shoulder width would be a maximum of 8'. Moorse added 8' per side. Goetten asked if the telephone poles would be removed? Gerhardson answered no. Moorae explained that approval is needed from both the DNR and the Watershed District, Mayor Peterson questioned Mabusth regarding her memo that the permit not be scheduled for action by the Council \jntil the DNR and MCvTO have had adequate time to review. Mabusth explained that it was presented at this time to avoid a delay while waiting for the permits. Goetten asked when the work would be done and expressed her concern regarding protection of wildlife during the nesting period. Gerhardson said that work would begin as soon as the permits are issued and road limits are off. Goetten expressed her concern about protection of wildlife during the nesting period. Jabbour added his concern over the extension of the culvert under Fox Street and the two lost culverts under the railroad right-of-way. Goetten also agreed with Jabbour and added her concer.. about finding the other culvert and future problems. Gerhardson responded that there has never been a question as to location of the culvert on Fox Street and that each end has to be added onto. The culvert underneath the railroad tracks is in question and the only culvert they are aware of has been found and he is not sure if there is another one. Mayor Peterson asked if the shoulders were required to be B' wide. Gerhardson answered that the standard shoulder is 8* wide but is not sure if that can be accomplished. The work will be done in stages and will not exceed 8'. Goetten asked if any neighbors had shown any concern. ■: ■ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING ETBLD MARCH 23, 1992 -V . y-' ZONING FILE #1720 - CONT. Gerhardson said that he received there were no problems. call from Mr. Perkins and that Callahan brought up his concern that the Council was asked to act upon this project before the permits had been received. Mabusth reiterated that she had beer requested by the Public Works Director to present it to Council to prevent further delay while waiting for the permits from the MWCD and DNR. She suggested that Council could approve it upon condition that tne City not proceed with the road repair until receipt of the permir.s. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3097 approving Application #1720 for the City of Orono, Pox Street (Section Located Between Orono Orchard and Brown Road South), granting a conditional use permit and variance to allow the filling of approximately 700 cubic yards of fill within an adjacent wetland of Fox Street for a distance of 1,000 lineal feet, on condition that the permits are received from the DNR and MWCD. Ayes 4, nays 0. (^#9) ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE #96, SECOND SERIES, INTERIM MORATORIUM ON GRANTING OF SUBDIVISION WITHIN SHORELAND AREAS OF CITY - ORDINANCE #102, SECOND SERIES It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to repeal Ordinance #96, Second Series, an ordinance establishing an interim moratorium on the granting of land subdivisions that*, have not received preliminary approval from the City. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*#10) #1723 PATRICIA & WILLIAM DICKEY, 2645 WATERTOWN ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3098 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3099 It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3098 approving Application #1723 to permit the temporary use of a 14x100' greenhouse at a maximum height of 10' on the property; and to adopt Resolution #3099 approving Application #1723 to allow an existing fence and garage to remain on property as they exist today and to approve a guest house use. Ayes 4, nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT It was decided to delay the report until later as people were waiting regarding other issues on the agenda. k:'f- li i tv, I Vyf,r MIMOTBS OF THF RBGUUU^ ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 23, 1992 ENGINEER REPORT (*#11) CHANGE ORDER - FACILITIES FRONTAGE ROAD It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve placement of Class 5 gravel on facilities frontage road. Ayes 4, nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (*#12) YEAR XVIII CDBG FUNDING - RESOLUTION #3100 See reference made at #1 above. (•#13) E \ H • J mOOD PARK BASEBALL SCHEDULE 1^. f ■- F I It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve the schedule of the Orono Baseball Association for the use cf Bederwood Baseball Field for the 1992 season as attached ro John Gerhardson's memo of 3/20/92, Ayes 4, nays 0. (*14) ESTABLISH SPRING CLEAN UP DAYS - MAY 2 AND 9 It v;as moved by Callahan, seconded by Peterson, to designate May 2 and May 9, 1992, as Orono Spring Clean-up Days. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*#15) YARDNASTE PROGRAM SCHEDULE It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve the yardwaste program and schedule for 1992. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#16) DATE ~ COUNCIL WORK SESSION - (#17) DATE - ASSESSMENT HEARING - STUBBS BAY SEWER After some discussion it was decided to schedule the Council work session for April 1, 1992 at 3:00 p.m. and the assessment hearing for May 4, 1992 at 7:00 p.m. (#18) BID AWARD UTILITY TRACTOR Moorse presented a memo from Gerhardson dated March 18, 1992 listing bids for replacement of the utility tractor and mower for the Public Works Department. He recommended that the low bid be accepted from Scharber and Sons for an amount not to exceed $23,896.00 but delay the purchase until more information is received regarding the State's budget problems and the effect it would have upon the City. Goetten stated that she was not going to approve the purchase unt^l the financial matters regarding the City facility were set. Gerhardson explained that he asked for an extension until May 1st before placing an order and that Scharber and Sons was in agreement. i':F u- i 'V'- ,,^v ■^'v '•h.i- iVti Sfe am- Mv ‘ 1v ■•. •'• .•■ •- f. >v^i 't: •ft' |lr Vr*-’n/v. - ^t.: :#■ f.^ i;:; t'. ri :?: - MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 23, 1992 BID AWARD UTILITY TRACTOR - CONT. Barrett explained the City's choices were to accept the bid with the intent to make the contract or to reject all bids or to table it. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to table as an open date the equipment purchase for Public Works. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*#19) INCREASE TITLE INSURANCE ON FACILITY SITE It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve an increase in the title Insurance coverage on the new facilities' property to reflect the total construction cost of the City facilities. Ayes 4, nays 0, (#20) NEWSLETTER COSTS AND OPTIONS Moorse explained that staff would like to send out a newsletter to residents containing informational articles iu particular the new Shoreland Regulations. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve plans for the City newsletter including outside typesetting. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#21) APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE OF PAYMENT NO. 1 - STBININGER CONSTRUCTION CO. KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION CO. Moorse requested payment for two items, one the initial application for payment for the site work being done and the second is the first payment to Kraus-Anderson the construction manager. Jabbour stated that we should receive lien waivers. Moorse explained that before the second payment can be made, the lien waivers must be set. Goetten asked the City Attorney if he was comfortable with this procedure. Barrett explained that it is usually the last payment that becomes the negotiated issue to determine that the lien waivers are in and the money gets paid. Jabbour stated that Kraus-Anderson should obtain lien waivers for payments simultaneously when the amount gets to 80%. Callahan requested a breakdown from Tom Kuehn, City Finance Director, of the amount spent on the project to-date. Also he wants a record kept of the budget spent for Kraus-Anderson and the architects to avoid discovery at a half way point that all the money is spent. Moorse confirmed that he has talked to John Davies and Tom Kuehn about keeping a record of the general conditions and expenditures under the contract for construction managers. 8 , - • ' ’t ■ * 'm. '& -5,V" > '• ■ ■ ■: ^ ■f.r * •% r ,-i4 r ■.^ t * ’i’ ^C; i:-’’hr^ H-., :* •, ,!■ '■f:w %i-:. 7' • ■7:- 77 ^ 77 r,- fc ^f;: ¥i 77 7 ' V t; J'‘ ij' 7^- '*('■ T'jt__^ MIHUTBS OF THE RBGOIAR ORONO COONCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 23, 1992 APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE OP PAYMENT NO. 1 - CONT. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve the payment for site clearing to Steininger Construction Co. in the amount of $60,750.00 and for partial construction manager fee to Kraus- Anderson in the cunount of $22,443.00. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#22) SPEED STUDY - BAST LONG LAKE ROAD - RESOLUTION #3101 Goetten expressed her surprise that it wasn't a posted speed limit and asked if there was a cost for the speed study. Gerhardson explained that there would be nc cost and that the study is done scientifically and mechanically. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3101 to request the Minnesota Department of Transportation to conduct a speed study on East Long Lake Road. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#23) BATHROOM IMPROraffiNTS ORONO GOLF COURSE Goetten asked if a new bathroom would be installed. Gerhardson explained that changes are necessary because of deterioration but because the City must conform to the Americans With Disabilities Act there has been an increase in costs. Mayor Peterson asked if the bathroom would be wheelchair accessible. Gerhardson answered that would be the ultimate goal. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve the budget improvements for the bathroom at the Orono Golf Course. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#24) PRESENTATION BY FRANK HORNSTEIN OP CLEAN WATER ACTION CONCERNING THE CORCORAN ASH REUSE PROJECT Mayor Peterson introduced Frank Hornstein of the Clecin Water Action Group, Fred Gustin from Metro Services and Ms. Maryann Campo who are involved in this project. Hornstein proceeded to inform everyone that he is a Co-director of Clean Water Action, a national organization, ^nd in charge cf the Minnesota chapter. This is a technical environmental issue. Incinerator ash has two different waste streams, the fly ash which are highly concentrated particles trapped in the air pollution control of the incinerator stack and the bottom ash which do€:s not contain the highly concentrated toxins. This by-product of the combustion process contains very highly concentrated levels of toxic metals and the ash has been found to be hazardous. A decision will be made tomorrow from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regarding disposal of ash in a facility that meets hcizardous waste regulations. Various reports and r ♦ ft- U r' r I-P-'iwf' p^:-' I.# =i.' ^ i. \-}iL-K ^m-m. W- i^- •■li?«- I fe- pi &:'■I; MIHDTES OF THE REGDLAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 23, 1992 PRESENTATION BY PRANK HORNSTEIN - CONT facts substantiating his views were passed among the Council. To have a highly lead based substanca paved on the roads in a general environme It of people, is a very dangerous gamble. Your letter to Corcoran was in support of testing this product on a rural road. The health risk study was prepared by the company that has a financial interest and is deficient. He also pointed out that testing on this scale has not been done anywhere in the world and now the test is proposed for Corcoran. He pointed out that the City's support should be not to ^.tilize the material that contains fly ash, to have a longer period of testing, and to have a moratorium on the permitting process for the plant. He indicated that his colleague, Mr. Wolf, and the Hoglund famil '■ from Corcoran were present in opposition to the testing. Mr. Wolf expressed his concern over the length of time before the roadway would come apart and that there is a substantial difference to the toxicity of this material compared to rock and gravel. The metals dc not disappear and is there forever even though it is perhaps washed into a roadway, river or lake. The North Dakota Department of Health denied a permit. It is our hope to get the pollutants and toxins out of the waste stream so they don't cause a problem in the first place. Mayor Peterson asked what the toxicity levels v;ere compared w.^th. Hornstein explained that lead would be present in the ash substituted roadway material at levels almost 160 times higher than the natural aggregate normally used to pave roads and 32 times higher than existing roadway soils. The aggregate material would be stone and gravel. Jabbour stated that he is not qualified to make a judgment regarding this decision and is f lal^ergasted that he was asked to do so by any other city. Hornstein went on to explain that mercury would be present 280 times higher than natural aggregate and 28 times higher than existing roadway soils. Cadmium would be present in the ash substitute roadway material at levels 22 times higher than natural aggregate and 55 times higher than existing roadway soils. The combined ash in the short term should go to a federally licensed hazardous waste stabilization facility and ir the long term there should be a reduction in the quantity and the v^xicity of the ash. Jabbour wanted to know why Orono was approached regarding a matter affecting Corcoran. Horstein stated that this issue has been subverted to a political issue. They were motivated to come to Orono because at tne time they were in Medina, Orono was debating this issue. Medina made the decision to stay out of it and that is his recommendation for Orono. There is a possibility of a large industrial plant capable of processing 200,000 tons of ash to be located somewhere in western Hennepin County. He asked that Orono make a motion taking into 10 ' ■ I-.- *1;, iy: S ■f-r. -•. 'h'* : © r "t I '•* hm. t ‘ fi, k. I- fv t-- i V Ir I r. I ♦ ■•f: C ii- I I i.- ■V MINUTES OF THE REGDIAR ORONO CODNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 23, 1992 PRESENTATION BY FRANK HORSTEIN - CONT. consideration the issues of the fly ash, long term testing and the plant. Mayor Peterson asked how many of the other ten communities liave indicated their support in theory to this project. Hornstein responded that only recently have they learned of the movement and have spoken only to Medina and now to Orono. Mayor Peterson asked Fred Gustin representing Metropolitan Services for comments . ed Gustin identified himself as Senior Project Engineer with unicipal Services Corporation based in Atlanta, Georgia, and a riubsidiary of U.S. P.C.I. which is based in Huston, Texas, which is a subsidiary of Union Pacific Railroad with $13,000,000,000.00 in assets based in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. For the last four years his company has been working with the Hennepin County Board on developing the use of the ash from the incinerator. His own background is as a Utility Engineer for Wisconsin Electric Power Company and managed approximately 250,000 tons per year of coal fly ash and found that it was successful to market the coal fly ash. He went south to work for a consulting company that specialized in coal ash utilization and feels it has a great deal of potential. In response to Mr. Hornstein’s three comments: The pilot plr t in Atlanta produced 100 tons of fly ash about two years ago. Since then representative samples were taker from an independent company and according to MPCA requirements the aggregate was ground down and tested. The test period for the fly ash in the 100 tons has passed the MPCA standards. At the end of five years the MPCA will look at the data supplied to them and will make a decision as to what to do with this roadway. It can either be brought to a disposal site or if the roadway is holaing up, it can continue to be monitored. On a permitting process, because of the experience in Dayton, iu has been decidevi to slow down the whole process. Even though they feel it is a good idea, his company has no intention of beginning construction of a plant after two years because of the necessity to perform an environmental impact statement first. Jabbour questioned why Orono was asked to be involved and expressed remorse after further checking into this matter. Goetten agreed and stated that Orono has always prided itself in being an environmentally concerned city. Maryann Campo addressed the Council and explained that she is a citizen who resides in Hennepin County. She is opposed to Hennepin County siting more land fills and feels other uses should be found for waste materials. Campo feels a decision should be made to allow testing for new products under strict monitoring. Moorsc added that Orono's correspondence supported moving ahead with MPCA testing. K-11 £■ * ^-'■ r' ir nIv. V- .V'- i:r, i:.' ?^' ■ '-)< ^:..- ■■ ■r.; :■m p-' •^..; S- ' *•- .• ■rl- >r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 23, 1992 PRESENTATION BY FRANK HORNSTEIN - CONT It VaC moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to reconsider Resolution #3091 in support of the ash asphalt road project. Ayes 2, nays 2. (#24a) A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING VOTING PRECINCT LINES IN THE CITY - RESOLUTION #3102 It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Callahan, to approve Resolution #3102 that the existing precinct lines should not be changed. Ayes 4, nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT Barrett suggested that 'e defer his report. (#25) LICENSES Goetten expressed her concern regarding trapping beaver and made reference to a phone call from Mr. Blankenship who has been sustaining damage to his property from beavers. Goetten said she could not support trapping beaver. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve the limited trapping permit to trap beaver for Bradford Blankenship, 2605 West Lafayette Rd. Ayes 3, nays 1. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve the following licenses: Septic System Installer - Hayes & Sons Excavating, Rt. 1, Box 202. Montrose Jerry Johnson Excavating, 2445 Morningside Rd. , TiOng I.ake McCarty Water & Waste, 6250 Hwy 12 W., Maple Plain ^atnode Brothers, 16551 Lake Ridge Dr., Maple Grove "livan Utility Services, 3660 Hwy. 101, Wayzata ompson Plumbing Corp., 15001 Mtka. Industrial Rd., Mtka. Volkenant, Inc., 1030 Co. Rd. 83, Maple Plain Widmer, Inc., Box 219, St. Bonifacius Site Evaluator/Designer - Rock's Soil Testing, Box 81, Loretto S-P Testing, Inc., 951 Katydid Lane NE, St. Michael Set Up License - Navarre Lanes, Inc., Box 51, Navarre TOR/COUNCIL REPORT Jabbour expressed his concern regarding budget cuts in Orono and Long Lake and the effect it has on the level of service for firemen and police. Also he wants Orono represented at the LMLOA meetings. (*#26) BILLS It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Mayor Petersen, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Ayes 4, nays 0. 12 I’"- ■ MHIUTBS OF THE REGULAR ORORO CX>UHCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 23, 1992 i • • ■m I' ‘ r* *: L-^' ’ 'K-'^ •m i- \ - ■ • ^.\r/ '1; '•F' h■^r <■. l:*V Vi W -’t-^ [••/■ v^-.. .vr^ ,• -:. i- -:■ , .-^ ^BNDA for council meeting set for MONDAY, MARCH 23, 1992, 7:00 P.M REVISED {*)Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon re';uest. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may b request from the Recorder.toi^tivmNG ROLL CALL MAR 2 3 IM Oath of Office - Police Officer David McNichols CITY OF ORONO 1. 7:00 P.M. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - YEAR XVIII CDBG FUNDING 2. CONSENT AGENDA* APPROVAL OP MINUTES 3. Regular Meeting of March 9, 1992 4. Introduction - Amelia Kroeger, Recycling Coordinator PARK COMMISSION COMMENT' PUBLIC CO]ITS - (Ljjait 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT **APPLICANTS** Immediately after the Council has reviewed your application please sign the three (3) original resolutions at the Recorder's desk. Applicants need not execute resolutions for subdivisions, vacations and denials. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. #1457 Alan Carlson, 3140 Watertown Road - Resolution Granting Extension of Preliminary Subdivision Approval #1718 Davis Pansier, 4180 Bayside Road - Variance - Resolution #1719 Henry Brantingham, 3185 Sixth Avenue North - Variance - Resolution #1720 City of Oronc - Fox Street (Section Located Between Orono Orchard and Brown Road South) Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Resolution Ordinance Repealing Ordinance #96, Second Series, Interim Morato*ium on Grantinq of Subdivision within Shoreland Areas of Ci' #1723 Patricia & William Dickey, 2645 Watertown Road - Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Resolution MAYOR/COONCIL REPORT ENGINEER REPORT 11. Char, e Order - Facilities Frontage Road CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 12. Year XVIII CDBG Funding - Resolution Bederwood Park Baseball Schedule Establish Spring Clean Up Days - May 2 and 9 Yard Waste Program Schedule Set Date for Council Work Session Regarding Stubbs Bay' Sewer Set Date - Stubbs Bay Sanitary .Sewer Assessment B a ring * * * 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, MARCH 23, 1992, 7:00 P.M. 18. 19. 20. 21. Bid Award Utility Tractor Increase Title Insurance on Facility Site Newsletter Costs and Options Application and Certificate of Payment No. 1 Steininger Construction Co. Kraus-Anderson Construction Co. Speed ^udy - East Long Lake Road Bathroom Improvements Orono Golf Course Hff2^ 5 Indentation by Frank Hornstein of Clean Water Concerning the Corcoran Ash Reuse Project ^^Establ ish 1 rui Vot 'nM F’reci nct •r * *22l 23. r\ cs ir. f ht ct i on City S REPORT p- ^ fe#: P'f?- . I?": :fc' n-r v't'l''/-isiim: mr LICENSES (25*) BILLS (26>^) ADJOURNMENT UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 03/16 - Planning Commission 7 p.m. Council Chambers 03/23 - Council Meeting 7 p.m. Council Chambers 03/24 - Facilities Design Committee 5 p.m. Room 107L Education Link 04/06 - Park Commission 7 p.m. 04/07 - Presidential Primary - All precincts vote at Room 107L - Education Link 04/13 • Council Meeting 7 p.m. 04/20 - Planning Commission 7 p.m. 04/27 - Council Meeting 7 p.m. 04/29 - 1992 Board of Review 7 p.m. - Council Chambers % i.- h: r' 'A m kf m ;/•■ Planri:^*'" Z2Tvmi,ssi^^ •-J T • “5 r r , •' « rr^r-r* ' • • ^ di.- I L /A A . .............•• ‘ CITY OF ORONO : PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFOR-MATIJN REQUEJ r?;:: BELOW F'JP OUR CITY P.-.....RDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS ¥)A/^/ ¥ f _____________...............................-/ .......- - - y 2. Cik.^. /krj / ;c/'»' « ✓ 3 .L //m t < V A'' A- 1 / /' \c / ^' ,.. y 4 4- “t-V ^ i 'm A * ,.. , /I...,. ---- —- 5. < f 1 6. \" .1. » 8. 9. 10. 1 i 11. NA.YE NYMBER PPESEN’T F - Y I f r om a-jenda) 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17... 18. 19. 2C. I'" sMkrkii... ^»h.i^ :^.i^\.^..: ;.f. COUNCIL A/IE'iTING MAR 2 3 1992MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 9, 1992 CITY OF ORON ROLL The Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Barbara Peterson, CounciI members Gabriel Jabbour , Edward Callahan, and J. Diann Goetten. Mary Butler was absent. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, City Attorney Tom Barrett, and City Engineer Glenn Cook. Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. (#1) YEAR XVIII CDBG FUNDING - PUBLIC HEARING - 7:00 - 7:24 P.M. The affidavit of publication was noted Moorse explained that the City, for the past two years, has r*ecelved allocations through Federal funding for the Community Development Block Grant P*'ogram (CDBG). Part of the requirement for receipt of the funding is that the City hold a pubiic hearing to determine allocation of funds. He noted this year the amount of funding is approximately $25,600. He stated that last year the majority of the funding was used for housing rehabilitation loan^. He explained that this year the proposal is to allocate $1,000 each to Westonka Community Action and Westonka Intervention. The person at the County responsible for helping the City determine allocations indicated that Interfaith Outreach had wanted to start a transportation program last year, but was unable to get that program coordinated and di not request additional funding for the upcoming year. Goetten stated she did not care whether Interfaith Outreach had an upcoming project or not, there is a 1increase in aid needed in this area and felt it important to give to that organization. She offered to review the situation. Gerhardson Indicated Interfaith Outreach had not used the funding allocated last year and the money was still with Hennepin County. The funding has to be used for a program approved by the County. He noted the money has to be used within 18 months. He clarified that the money used for rehabilitation was a grant not a loan. Mayor Peterson asked how the funds used for a park plan would benefit low to moderate Income persons or families as suggested in the memo from Moorse. I '6t'\^. PJv--: ‘“I'IJt k *- ,r- . '-^~ fe-fe.'r-c » h?"^V' ?tP&:' I. A/ k: i/ss>;?l; &•■■ t#' s’:- ■ ii^ •■^5’ ^^n'-j- S ■ ■ •;.V >: ■> Mipp K>'^p^>v- mi ■ Sr?^' ■ f'm m$-'few'r'V' &m- 5^»-‘ ' •*< Ifc MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 9, 1992 CDBQ FUNDING - CONT. Moorse explained the memo should read that the funds must be used to benefit low to moderate income persons or families, and since parks benefit all residents, this would be an appropriate use. Goetten asked about other people that need the money for rehabiI!tation. Moorse Indicated there were only two persons on a waiting list requesting money, and ne was unsure how much money these persons needed. Jabbour agreed with a master plan for the parks, but felt it was Inappropriate for the CDBG funds to be used for such a project. AlI Members agreed. Callahan asked how many residents or number of homes benefitted from the funds from last year. were Qerhardson noted there was not a tally o^ those numbers. Callahan asked if the other projects were administered by Hennepin County. Qerhardson noted that with the exception of the Park Master Plan, the County administers all the other programs requesting funding. Jabbour asked what constitutes low to moderate income. Qerhardson was unable to respond to this question. Goetten stated she would prefer to spend the money on persons in need rather than a park plan. Mayor Peterson asked if the organizations requesting funding are made aware in advance the dollar amount available. Qerhardson noted that each Citv is allowed a certain percentage of the total amount of funding to be allocated to social service organizatIons. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to continue the public hearing on the allocation of CDBG funds, and request that staff consider other projects to allocate the funding; one being Interfaith Outreach, an'^ to remove Item <M 1 from the agenda which would adopt a resolution allocating funding for a parks and open space master plan development. Ayes 4, rays 0. 1 ■mm- ¥:;> l&.':p&;' it" itN ^■* ki-t' :r-. fe-.-r i?v;. ;v, *'-■'■ iK'*.' • ;'*v^i- - tifK' i^ !''■ atB:!<, lii;v..' lii't ■■■ ■ fifc-.., . '‘:-3'v- Vf; -! ■ Jpa-. . 1^- f' ^ .'■ ■ A ■ iv^*i* ■ 3t-r tm*- m:n fi giv MtfS, pSH^ ptS^vTv" MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 9, 1992 CDBG FUNDING - CONT. Kiki Sonnen, Director cf Westonka Community Action and LaDean McWiI I Iams, Representative to West Hennepin Commonity Services were present. Sonnen noted when she sent the request for $1,000 she did not have a break down of persons served by community, but it was now available. The request was based on past contributions, but noted an Increase In services to residents of Orono. Callahan noted the intention of the motion was not to turn down the requests but i ather allow staff to review additional needs for funding by such organizations. Jabbour requested to know exactly what was spent on each of the programs, and how the $1,000 request was figured out. Sonnen stated that HUD looks at all the money from Hennepin County to make sure that 155t is used for services and the remainder for other projects such as comprehensive planning for cit’es. Goetten questioned the 153S limit to be spent on these services. Moorse noted the City could allocate more for these serv'ces, but someone else would be required to spend less. Callahan suggested staff review the guidelines for allocation of funds and include a report for review at the next meeting. Moorse Indicated that the cities had an understanding to only spend 15X as that Is wnat the Federal government allows. Dan Hessburg, Westonka Intervention, noted their budget is very limited at approximately $il,700, and they service surrounding communities. Westonka Intervention thought funding would be cut for the upcoming year and therefore did not request an additional amount. (#2) CONSENT AGENDA Jabbour added Item #5 to the consent agenda. Callahan removed Item #ll from the agenda. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve the Consent Agenda. Ayes 4, nays 0. Motions for all items adopted by consent agenda will be included In the minutes in their respective numerical order. f^V-.'T’" '- : V. I-.;.- - :■>' ■■ %:. ®; »'r' tr>v‘v ■■ ft. ;^-- ¥ I# • 1?; Fii-®p-’m-P4i' P':' msifi-. &M J'k. fejfgv-? i!ifc- « -fl >rfc • -^ .- .:*. V m Bl ft-': «*? ■ !•■'• ■c.vK.i, •V' ■ i<p'^tec '^l MfcE'JSs.iWSs !■'t; e:P--te.. U- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 9, 1992 (»#3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, tc approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Orono Council held on February 24, 1992. Ayes 4, nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS Park Commission Chair Dick Flint explained he was there to discuss the usage of Bederv-^ood Park by OBA for the 1992 season. He stated that Gary Larson, OBA, has addressed the Park Commission on this matter, and notice has been given to surrounding neighbors, and there were no negat i ve comments. He stated the usage will con 11 nue the same as last year at Bederwood Park. He indicated the Commission has discussed future usage of school property by OBA. He noted the Commission voted 7-0 to recommend usage of Bederwood Park by OBA for the 1992 season. Jabbour expressed approval of the plans shown to the Counci I for future fields on the school property. Flint noted that the Hockey Association did not approve of the arena being moved westward, but they would continue to work on the Issue. Jabbour noted that the approval of the usage of BeJerwood Park should be formally on the agenda before the Council could vote on it. Callahan noted the OBA and the Hockey Association are private organizations, and felt the City shou'd not be involved in the planning process for these groups. Flint noted they are involved because of the planning aspect. He explained that the Hockey Association will actually purchase the land for the arena, but OBA will be using the land owned by the school under a joint powers agreement with the school and the City. Callahan asked who has said this will be operated under a joint power's agreement with the City. Flint noted they will need to determine another way if that is not amenable. Goetten noted the City’s obligation to help find areas for the youth in the area to play sports. ..... i J1 i*:-'V' Kv..; ■■ ■ Mi"- ■■ Mi- It-mm 1-'•■ i-’i!-'*: .. wmW' MMr^' Safe'-mm-' WM-' •■■Sv-.' ..■ifffc- -.■ .,V. . ' te -i , U: '•" ' ■- : si sjsj. *: :■ Sfo.34-' :■ f ■ ^4--, ►*i: P" r^- m-r is&,wi ^ k.. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 9, 1992 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - CONT. FIint stated that OBA has indicated they will be requesting funding for the bail fields. Jabbour noted that at a recent gathering, a representative of Hennepin Parks indicated that perhaps Hennepin County Parks would purchase the developable property at the sewer plant site. Flint stated that the Pa^k Commission intends to hold a public i nforr»aL ional meeting for input on usage of his land. Mayor Peterson questioned FIint about the MS bikeathon and stated the Commission did not appear to have a problem with 1,000 bikers In the area. Flint agreed that it appeared to be a lot of bikers in Summit Park at one time, but the Commission determined it not to be a problem. Mayor Peterson asked if the route had changed as she was unaware that they would be using East Long Lake Road. Gerhardson noted that it was the recommendation of the Police Department not to use East Long Lake Road, but they reported to the Commission the desire to use Summit Park as a rest area and convinced the Commission that required safety measures must be provided. (#4) »1457 ALAN CARLSON, 3140 WATERTOWN ROAD - REQUEST TO EXTEND APPROVAL Alan Carlson was present for this application. Moorse explained that this is a request to extend the deadline period for preliminary subdivision approval because of the probability of a southerri bypass for Highway 12. The applicant Is requesting the dead! ne be extended for one year. Moorse indicated the following issues of concern: newly adopted shoreland regulations; and park dedication ordinance. The City Attorney has opined that original park dedication ordinance would still apply for the appI I cation. Carlson noted the proposed 12 lots are in the s' .them portion of the property, and the southern bypass goes right though the property. He felt that a yea** would not resolve the issue. Goetten noted that the City is pushing MnDot to pick a preferred corridor, precisely because of situations I ike this one. Ik ./w i'te. i§ v--~' fe' fc: §i:m, i •&mM;- rP'm-1- 3 sfe:'- m^’- ■ Wi'^'..nr > •■’: ^ 'v/ »« ' •^^-%m:~ifc:- H#'' .‘^,- *M'??- -- • ' ■■'*■■ • -. ■ ii- II lin'pi' III ill" li-?i5r »fe' ■r^:. :. T-' ^V- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 9, 1992 ZONING FILE #1457 - CONT. Mayor Peterson Indicated that in the new scoping documei.t, MnDot is suggesting a decision by January 1994. Jabbour reviewed that the City has reiterated to MnDot by t‘'*«t time the Councils may have changed, which would further de / the project In order to update any possible new Councils. Mayor Peterson suggested that the deadline be extended beyond the 12 month request. Barrett stated that the Statute discusses extension for only one year. Jabbour felt that the shoreland regulations would be a greater impact for the property. •labusth noted there will be no problem with the newly adopted shoreland regulations with regards to this application. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve "he extension request for Application #1457 Alan Carlson, 3‘40 Watertown Road, and to direct staff to draft an appropriate resolution for action at the March 23rd meeting, and to determine that the former park dedication ordinance would still be valid for this subdivision. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*♦5) #1711 EDWIN & TRACEE GIBBS, 1135 LOMA LINDA AVENUE - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3086 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3086 approving Application #1711 for Edwin and Traces Gibbs, 1135 Loma Linda Avenue, to allow construction of a detached garage in front of the front line of the principal residence. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#6) *1712 EDWARD BAKER, 3059 FARVIEW LANE - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3087 Moorse explained the request was originally for additional hardcover and setback variances to construct a deck and stairway, which was approved In October 19'2. The appileant has adjusted the original plan that reduces the amount of hardcover and makes the walkway safer. v'c, -:■ ■ ■ ■ ■ .y. P:* I - K ..W:m E:-''’’v me S V’;" ' i;. tm ' ■ ■UK:ir'-'•A'- -'i:w:'^ m 'Wm- W’ .1" '• Bi',: • ir I’fc'- ■: ■ iJ^v tf ,16/ IP- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 9, 1992 ZONING FILE #1712 - CONT. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution #3087 approving AppIication #1712 for Edward F. Baker, 3059 Farview Lane, for an amendment to the c iginally aoproved variances to construct a deck and stairway. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#7) #1713 WHITNEY & BETTY MACMILLAN, 1660 FOX STREET - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3088 Herb Baldwin was present to represent the applicants. use the Moorse explained this is an application for a conditional permit to enable the relocation of a retention pond area on property. He stated the pond will still retain the same size and depth. Baldwin explained it really is a wet/dry meadow. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3088 approving Application #1713 for Whitney and Betty MacMillan of 1560 Fox Street, to allow the relocation of a retantion pond. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#8) #1715 CIT'' OF ORONO, 2700 TOWN HALL ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTIOi* #3089 Goetten stated she did not recall naming the frontaje road Tow• Hall Road, and suggested they consider other o.i ions. She suggested in honor of Les KeI ley, they dedicate the road Kelley Memorial or sc.netMng to that effect. She questioned additional costs Involved because of the wetland areas. Callahan noted that it appears to be enough work to dredge just one pond rather than three. Moorse explained that two ponds are already existing on the site, so only one will need to be dredged, which will cost money to do but can be offset by selling the black di’"*:. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3089 for Application #1715 for the City of Orono, 2700 Town Hall Road, approving a conditional use permit and variance for the construction of a three pond proposal. Ayes 4, nays 0. >1 'ii %.'.n M-m- . f- - Mib p f-v ^• Ms \: K^Jryt-y ■ rVC.'^> bv »-. :pf- ^■tr .K'':' . •»*•' ■ '.?• ■ , • '"rfc i f'. ■SsiiK If- $V. 5¥'' ■5ii ^i‘ ■. ■i;-*nV^ a #81;’if.4-. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 9, 1992 (*9) Planning commission reappointments It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to appoint Charles Kelley, Maureen Bellows, Charles Schroeder and Edward Cohen to additional terms on ^he Planning Commission. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#10) planning commission appointment Mayor Poterson noted that only one person can be appointed at this time, but encouraged future appileaf ions by the others who app!led. It was moved by Goetten, seconaed by Jabbour, to appoint Steve Peterson to the Planning Commission. Ayes 4, nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT A) Callahan suggested that a letter be sent offering condolences egarding the death of Donna Roehl, Ci ty Medina, to the City of Medina and her family. tne City’s Clerk for B) Jabbour mentioned a mreting with members of the Long Lake Council regarding the duplication of services of the cities and how those services could be consolidated. He noted that this Counci I seems receptive to the idea of seeking out adjacent municipa Iities to consoiidate services to eliminate the dup Moorse review the Issue. cation, and suggested Goetten indicated that the Long Lake Council members commended the Police Department. C) Mayor Peterson noted that Orono will be one participants of the two tiered hockey system, and on Council wished the Orono hockey team success. of the first behaIf of the (»#11) YEAR XVI11 CDBG FUNDING This Issue was removed from the agenda. (*♦12) APPOINTMENT OF ELECTION JUDGES - PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY - RESOLUTION #3090 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3090 appointing election Judges for the Presidential Primary election to be held on April 7, 1992. Ayes 4, nays 0. 8 if :. ... w..! . 1 • pi*:,. |Jfc‘)'iVi''i^». ■; W ■ :?■ • i.. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 9, 1992 ^ (»#13) CORCORAN ASH ASPHALT ROAD PRO.’ECT - RESOLUTION #3091 It was movad by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3091 expressing the City’s support of the ash asphalt road project. Ayes 4, nays 0. (»#14) 1992 POLICE OFFICER CONTRACT SETTLEMENT It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve the 1932 Police Officer contr-.ct settlement, and to authorize the Mayor and City AdminiStrator to sign the contract reflecting the items listed in the memo dated March 3, 1 992 from City Administrator Moorse. Ayes 4, nays 0. (»#15) TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES ORONO GOLF COURSE It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to authorize the employment of the temporary employees at their respective positions and hourly rates at the Orono golf course for the '992 golfing season, as foilows: EmpIoyee Betty Stevens WaI ter Mills Fred Abrahamson Forest Jostrom Doug Erickson Dan Oas Position John Ross Bill McIntyre Jane Delaney Counter helper Counter helper Counter helper Counter helper Night water Ing Counter helper/ starter Counter helper Counter helper Groundskeeper/ helper Wage $6.25/hcur 5.50/hou r 5.25/hour 5.25'hou r 6.00/hour 5.75/hour 5.50/hour 5.25/hour 5.25/hour Ayes 4, nays 0. (»#16) RECOGNITION Oh LESTER KELLEY - RESOLUTION #3092 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3092 recognizing Lester Kelley as a Park Commission Member. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*#17) PROCLAIM THE WEEK OF MARCH 8-14 TO BE GIRL SCOUT WFCK - RESOLUTION #3093 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3093 proclaiming the week of March 8-1 4, 1992 to be Girl Scout Week. Ayes 4, nays 0. PiS' &k -' •:' .; . ' • VJ?^ .‘t.fi. ■i® ; lls% ^ I:m0; . *A3XS.M^^**'^ •• .. -s MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 9, 1992 (#17A) HIRING OF A POLICE OFFICER Mayor Peterson reiterated that this position has been authorized for hiring already. Moorse noted they have completed the interviewing process, and it Is recommended that Council authorize hiring of Mr. McNichois. It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Jabbour, to authorize the hiring of David McNichois as a full-time police officer as of March 16, 1992 at an hourly rate of $13.35. Ayes 4, nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT Callahan suggested Council adjourn to Executive Session to discuss possibIe lit!gat I on. (»»M8) LICENSES There were no I icenses. (««19) BILLS It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten cf the All Funds Account. Ayes 4, nays 0. to approve payment ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adjourn the regular Counci I meeting at 8:20 p.m. Ayes 4, nays ^ Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: Do:cchy M. Hallin, City Clerk " 7 ‘r; ‘I - 'i^ * ^■.>-v/ m-- ■- rC;v- = :\ •■ m ■ mh ^"■- W-: •0^-] 0^' ■ li>-S ;\ : a-■ ^ r k' • i^rv' r b '- ' ■ /■.-km-h i.'.?.:-. i tp- ■- I te% Ivf- m i^'-k m'm ■■ rar^-t 4 :. • : A RESOLUTION GRANTING EXTENSION OP the effective period OF PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR THE PLAT, CRYSTAL CREEK, APPLICATION NO. 1457 WHEREAS, on April 8, 1991, the City Council of the City of Orono adopted Resolution No. 2948 granting preliminary approval of a plat proposed by applicant, Alan G. Carlson, involving the property located at 3140 Watertown Road; and WHEREAS," the effective period of preliminary plat approval expires one year after the adoption of Resolution No. 2948, such expiration date being April 8, 1992; and WHEREAS, the applicant has advised Council that he is unable to fulfil ’ the conditions of preliminary plat approval until the issue of the option 'f a southern bypass for the Highway 12 improvement is resolved; and WHEREAS, applicant has demonstrated a substantial financial commitment during the review of the preliminary subdivision application. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono that the effective period of preliminary plat approval for Alan G. Carlson's proposed plat known as Crystal Creek involving the property located at 3140 Watertown Road as approved per the conditions of Resolution No. 2948 originally adopted Aoril 8, 1991, is hereby extended to April 8, 1993. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 23rd day of March, 1992. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Page 1 of 2 Mk i:.. rv-. r- ^p.-< ■M-m: f“: T ^v■ L^' vi#' :^V ■r-’;. - I-f* i'-. To:Mayor Peterson and City Orono City Council Chairman Kelley and Planning Cor*mission Members Ron Moorser City Administrator U. From: Date: Subject: Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager March 9, 1992 #1718 Davis Pansier, 4180 Bayside road Variance - Public Hearing C0l>'NC!L MEEniVG MAR 2 3 1992 CITY OF ORONO . Zoning Pistrict: RR-IA, Rural Residential, 5 acre minimum Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.27, Subdivision 5 (B). Front/street setback variance for the principal dwelling is required. Required = 100* Proposed * 75' Variance « 25' or 25% List of Exhibits A B C D E F G H Application Survey & Topographic Detail at 100' Setback Survey & Topographic Detail at 75' Setback Walkout Floor Plan First Floor Plan Soil Testing, Septic System Design Property Owners List Plat Map Description of Request The applicant proposes to construct a new residence approximately 75' from the front lot line requiring a setback variance. If Planning CommissiwU recalls, this is the lot to the immediate east of the Knapp property. Access is granted via Outlet D of the Knapp 3-unit PRD. The applicant requests a 25' front yard setback variance from the required 100' setback. The survey of this property indicates that a majority of this property is wetland area with the remainder being steeply sloping eastward towards the wetland. In 1990 a variance application was granted to Sam McCloud for a front setback variance at the very same setback. Enclosed is a copy of soil testing and system design (Exhibit F) approved in 1990. This soil testing information was submitted for an 8-bedroom home and will be satisfactory for the applicant's 5-bedroom home. The home plans submitted by the applicant indicate a guest or non-rental apartment in the walkout level (Exhibit D). The homeowner will apply for a separate conditional use permit for the non-rental apartment. V 'Zoning File #1718 March 9, 1992 Page 2 im !T* Due to the steep sloping terrain, the applicant will be ^^i^ixpected to file detailed grading and drainage plans with the building permit application. V •-.-i -.■V it ' '.,v Mki }• 'il:v :4;. iP- jlil'ffe- feC"' it f ■ ■■‘f "*• ■tP'f %!«.'■ ■••'.t-V.- »• HardL'hip Stateaent 1.Due to steeply sloping topography, the house has been placed at the edge of the ridge in order to minimize erosion and the major cutting into more steeper elevations. 2.Severe slopes to the east and north required placement at the top of the ridge in order to minimize the impact on extreme dense vegetation. Additional Coanents and Planning Conmission Recommendation March 19, 1992 The Planning Commission voted unanimous approval of the proposed variance. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation, Isv b"-..P*|iv.‘::-'i, - iibP mmf fe- V lv,%' ’■•'■I :C fell ■W-s':- ■i-r ■ >- " ■ ; , K,:l:'m".m •'^i- &■■ ■ eK' »>■ ->': )!*• ''si. m iH- ’^■.- y’<TV ■I.-: fe ■■ fe-.; ?&■ §0' A RESOLDTION GRANTING A TJ^ANCB TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10,27, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) PILE #1718 ffHERBAS, Davis Pansier (hereinafter ”the applicant") is owner of the property located at 4180 Bayside Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and lethal ly described as follows; The West 23 acres of that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Princ.^pal Meridian, lying South of the southerly right-of-way line of the Luce Line Trail. (hereinafter "the property"); and WHBRBASf the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Cf'de Section 10.27, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the construction of a principal dwelling 75' from the front or street side lot line where a 100' setback is required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. 2. 3. This application was reviewed as Zoning rile #1718. The property is located in the RR-IA Zoning District. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on March 16, 1992, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings: A.Due to steeply sloping topography, the house has been placed at the edge of the ridge in order to minimize ero ion and the major cutting into more steeper elevations. B.Severe slopes to the east and north require placement at the top of the ridge in order to minimize the impact on extreme dense vegetation. Page 1 of OiOl#] [•llT« r«fsit¥»i i f2wm] ■ Mil'M 111! MfOl S b W"ps s%;- ■ pv'".te ■ !»:■iSi#III#.. ^ V/. • k' .■';Pm. life.1#K:' iSii- fa“tt ll-^' The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors ^nd assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of March, 1992. ATTEST: fe.‘V''ir.;0-r p-’’ |®r- ■ Imm-tei?' »■ft. Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Pe-pi'-on, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. ft-te:.- ".. pirn- mi/sv ■ ifeft- : H- The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 23rd day of March 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public- Page 3 of 4 Ww- Ir.. .• •P-tea. 4 f [•T:X«l iMil Ml (AJ CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional varianc Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Pact Fees (Double application fee) #1718 nC-MAiM UMU/I f I-* re r.czrrcI X rrtnulm u*i • lui- ^ - r,. • a w V . -L Vvv' V 1 CUIf A I a VV "uen Ti f Tk Af' •, I l-U M ? U 1 I w.* • iT " ” ’ _ T L» A .V'A V n 'f fu w i- A » > * I ‘r^nts • wt-’ PROPERTY INPORMATION Site Address ^ I So c . rVi< v/>? WW. , ..--r V ... ' oa I •I Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.)^!!?/"//'^'-^^ .0^^' Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _(month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property:_ _residential _ _ _other(specify) Zoning District:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT Name i Phone (home) ^73" C'9 Phene (work) Address: \oL- i.Cu.L.7 City:L0> t Zit Zip: / -j. ONNER (if different than applicant)Phene (home) d 7/ Name 1 1" ft 5 'Phone (work) Address DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST ; 6 b C -I J • i ' b ■ r:’. 7"City: U3o c r.^.aAd._____i^'ipt ^ « Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage Setback = / Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIF/DBSCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements:________ ..a W-h' ■■ •M.. k- ^:S S'- f ) ■• V/',v (attach additional sheets if necessary) RBQUIRED SUBMITTALS aix of followliiq information must be submitted by the application doadllns date in order for your application to be considered complete: 1. _Completed Application Form 2. _ _Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center • 348-3271). 3. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. _Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%"xll" for reproduction). 5» Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8Jj"xll"). 6, _Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8*5"xll"). 7. _^As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of 8. any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICAHT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide ail information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant- expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct/to the best/of his/her knowledge. Arplicant's Signature Date ONNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submitt Is into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Ccmmission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. I / i'v ‘--#fe.•psk t m- Iv ■> ^ 1 s DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY Rights of subjects of • ' .U' Vj'V* , f;.’ ■K': mW- |y;- ■ .-1-1 'f-. m .•<>You are notified that: 1 The information you furnish will be used to determine youi qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under M.S. 13.04 to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. 7>) ' First 1 O G cr>nrvjj^ Middle Last Address c\ n7T7rh[T^------------ ------------------ f V>~v^ State ,rr3 ^ i Zip n cs'ni Phone » .4 ► • t ■ I ihiCAi t Of bunvuT f uri CTMaih r‘»V» pM^st 23 acres of that port of the Bo>^theast Quarter of the Qu rter of Section 31. Township 118 North. Banae 23 West 5^ 6th Prljiclpal Hcrldian» lylim South of the ooutherijr rUht-of-vejr line of the Luce Line Trail. Thle cwrvej intends to ehow the bonmdariee of the above deecribed property, and the Rropooed location of a profpoeed hooM. It doea not lairport to ahow any other ieprovjaeente or enoroaclaamte« Datun: Mean eem level o : Iron marker Bearinaa nhom are baeed upon an aaeuMd datue. LI/I". I //Virr ci>r/ ctty op ordno septic system aPPBOVal. Permit: #. Fee $,___ J\.,Entered By —« i-»-F -^his repoirt and iS .1 -'ontractor »ill b® =nl^contractorB. Septic yste» desi9^ . _ ___ _______— --------^— ]^OC&TXOH CCTERAX. coMxx^^—- septic coktsactor .-----^------- __ ^ ^ MrCl:r^ - ir::i:)□ APPBOVCT , Note Chaoges 3elow _____ ^J3£S- . |4/|nuroC:^ 1 r,.wv yo'> /tsg^ <A.mO fegt> -S3 Pc-Tg-P ;^-rf)eA-LS I V—------------------------- —^— -----------------Tu^:ir^-. IS, ^ -------------------------------------------- S.eT’o^-^ f7A/ot-/Z/<^^ f’Ut^Py.h - - advance. --otected prior to «, rENERAt C0KTRACT0P3: -To\“ of nattral soil. a after systea. ftt to all tra-*ic ov linfield areas must be -eacea o- ;'j:Date Approvea K:" «S3<- ?Yv;v' M;> •'- >% , ■•'■.I . ■ '■f”S' . :^::k:;:-tei- >l.;v, .^. . JzF^^ ,z is. ■•- .#W,I SYSTEM DESIGN FOR MLR CONSTRUCTION McCLOUD RESIDENCE in the SE 1/4 of SECTION 31-118-23 ORONO, MINNESOTA 10-9-90 Additional information follows for the installation of a pressure mound system. In addition to those requirements, two septic tanks of 2000 gallon capacity each are recomme..ded along with a 1000 gallon pumping tank. ^ ^ All construction traffic must be kept off both the primary and the alternate septic sites. Grading must be done to divert some small drainageways around the mound area and _o keep othe- runoff water away. All construction and moterials must aahere to the provisions of the City of Oronc. If any other information is needed, please contact me. Sincerely, PERCOR, INC.^ ■ - Mark S. Gronberg, PCA certified r^ i 's r’\ V.r. • I m- V' L_l <M> racaj also depend uponChan 5 minutes pei: inch. The allowable percolation , . uj the slope of the original ground surface. A table 't the^e re.atxonships is presented on pagr E-8. It should be noted that mound construction be gins with the 12-inc . layer of clean sand upon whicn the roc.< is place-. The design material presented in section E of this Manual suggejrs a possible "cookbook” approach and is intenued to deal pr'.mariiy witn mounds or "berms" for single family residences, or daily sewage flow rates of no more than 1,200 gallons. A flow of 1,200 gallons per day can be treated with a rock bed 10 feet wide by 100 feet xong in a propeny construe.e- mound or "berm." However, the proper hydraulic operation of a mound depends upon lateral a.s v;el? as vertical seepage. Wiile there is little douot that rock beds wider chan 10 feet will operate satisfactorily on some soils as far as flow hydraulics is concerned, a ca "ul analysis must be made of the ground slope and soil permeability underlying Clio clean sand layer Ot t..e mound. A vertical separation of at least 3 feet is required cetween the hot.cm of Che rock bed and any restricting layer in order to maintain aerobic condi tions in Che clean sand under the rock layer. (Mien consolidated impermeable_ bedrock is present the vertical separation distance is 7 feet.) Mien aerobic conditions exist in the clean sand, the long-term acc<_ycance rate will be 1.- gallons per day per square foot. If Che depth to the restriccing layer is inadequate or the rock bed is too wide, anaerobic conditions may exist and cause a much slower acceptance race. To evaluate Che possitLlity or anaerobi conditions and the subsequent hydraulic failure is Che ma]cr design problem when sizing mounds larger chan those required for single :ami_y resicen-es. Thus, the design criteria of section E cannot be simply multiplied by a scale factor and expected to properly treat larger flows. The hydrau.iv,s of ..aceral and vertical movement in the clean sand layer and the soil uruer the elevated rock bed must be carefully analyzed to ascertain that anaerobic condici'jns will not exist. Thus, both lateral and horizontal permeabilities of the.under lying soil layers must be utilized to analyze the flow regime to estimate the height of the saturated zone. Where heavy clay soils with slow permeabilities and high seasonal saturated conditions generally exist over an area, ic is far better to utilize mounds for one or two single family residences Chan to collect the effluent from many residences than attempt to dispose and treat ic at a single location. The flow hydraulics in clay soils will require ecther large depths of fill, or underdrainage, or beth, in order to design a proper sewage treatment sy -.em to prevent anaerobic conditions under the rock layer. As an example, a mout.-J designed to treat 450 gallons per day may function very well under certain clay soil conditions, while a single mound serving 5 or 10 residences will fail hydraulically if constructed according to the same vertical separation specifications. Proper construction practices for mounds are extremely important but^when carefully followed will produce a sewage treatment system that will .unction effectively on a long-term basis. There are an estimated 5.000 single family mounds successfully treating sewage in Minnesota. Many Minnesota have found that properly designed and constructed mounds or^ berms ^ effective method of sewage treatment and accept taem as a s.ar.uard s, s 1:%^.I®irte iSgs"Mi’v ''■’\;v*u. t*' * I . \ 8tvJ-’m-s.i* i ■m'r . . :/ £-19 »fe>. •..■ MOUira DESIGN PROCEDU?>£ (For Flovs up to 1200 gpd) A. Sewage Flow Rate See D-7 or 1-3, A, or 5, or ase metered value; Flow Rate - /2O0 gpd /T/or. B. Septic Tank Liquid Volume (see C-3 or gallons C» Soil Characteristics 1. Depth to restricting layer such as seasonally saturated soil, bedrock, coarse scil, etc. ; So Inches 2. Depth of percolation tests; /S inches Number of percolation test holes; ^ holes Ave. percolation rate; y. /_____rapi 5. Landslope » S ^ 7, D. Rock Laver Dinensicr.s' 1. Multiply gpd by 0.33 to obtain required area of rock layer; /2 gpd X 0.83 " fc 2. Select width of rock Icyer (10 feec or less) “ fO feet 3. Length of rock layer ■ Area - Width/_^^sq ft - JO_tt ' » fOO fc E. Rock Volume 1. Multiply rock area by rock depth to get cubic feec of rock; sq ft 7S ft = 7^(7 CM ft 2. Divide cu ft by 27 c ft/cu yd CO get cubic yards; 2 7. S 3. Multiply cubic yards by 1.4 to get weight of rock in tons; 2 7. cv yds X 1.4 - SS. ‘^tons ressure Distribution System Select number of perforared laterals ^ Select pertorotion = 3 ft sp'.cing 3. Select perforated lateral length; Note if manifold is at > ad of rocU layer, lateral if ch is roci. laytr length less half c p ;rf ora cion spacing. If -'.an if old is in •'.enter of rock layer, lateral length is one-half rock layer leng_h less half a perforation spacing. Perforated lateral ’ ength = y/, C ft. Divide lateral length by perfor ation spacing to get number of perforations per lacar^l So feet r S feeC = / 7 perfs Note: last perforation must be in end cap, (see page E-14) Multiply perforations per lateral by number of laterals Co get cctal number of perforations; /7 perfs/lat x ^ lacs = /^Z. 6. Determine required flow race by multiplying number of perforations by flow per perforation (see page E-17) /{P Z perfs X ,7Vgpro/perf ° /jT.Sgpm 7. Select minimum rcauired lateral diameter from table on Page E-i7; enter table with perforation spacing, perforation diameter, and number of perforations per lateral. Select minimum diameter for perforated lateral *■ / inches ^ t4S^ 2 G. Basal Width 1. Percolation rate in top 12 inches of soil is 7. / mpi , /6 j 2. Select allowable soil loading rate from table on page E—16; 0.60 gpd/f !f.^V ?!•; W^'p.--..!r+-. •fe.' - ■K i-r: ■'m lit- •• ik *- .-i ■••:a mm i.-'■»•■--' ■ I # R t-20 MOUND DESIGN PROCEDUT.E (C. n :inue-J) (For Flows up CO 1200 gpi) G.3. Calculace basal widch racic by dividing rock layer loading rate o. 1.20 gpd/ft^ by allowable -jil loading race; 1.20 gpd/fc2 -^.<^pd/ft^ - Check this value on page E-16. . Multiply basal widch ratio by rock layer width to get required basal widch; 2 • O X /Of £c ^20 fc H. DovTislooe Dike Widch 1 If landslope is 37, or more, subtract rock layer widch from basal widch to obtain minimum do\^slope dike toe width 20 f C - /a fC • /O fc Calculate mound height at edge of rock layer on downslope side, a. Determine depth of clean sand fill ac upslope edge of rock layer: /. ^ feet b. Multiply rock layer widch by landslope to determine drop in clcvacion; /J X c." 7. - ICO ^ 0,6 it Add drop in elevation to depth of clean sand at upslope edge of rock layer to get depth of clean sand at downslope edge • of rock layer. f t + /. ^f c « /.oft . Add depth of clean sand at down- slope edge to depth of rock layer to depth of soil backfill CO get mound height at downslope edge of rock layer; /.oft +0. ''Si c + /. fS f c “ 7. C i c Enter cable on page E-13 with landslope and downslope dike ratio. Select dike multiplier of ^6 y.* / . ..... IJ 'I ^ 4 • W « ^ •Multiply dike mulcipl:or by doumslope mound heir->,t; jcc downslope dike wiach; S.i€ '■ 7j6 = /<P. J f: 3 Compare the values of step . I -r.d step H.2.5. Eelecc the greater of the two values as the downslope dike widch; /F. 7 ‘Get h. Calculate upslope dike width using upslope ~.ounci !ic:gi-.t and upslope dike nultiplier r* ^ ’ Q . •• ». 4, t 7^ 1. Total mour.ci -•tdc!i is ciic sum of upslope dike widtii >lus : ock layer width plus Jcvnslope dike i c! til * ?.7iz'- /O it -77.6iz If landslope is 2.9 percent or less, basal ’..-idch induce'' bet'n the upslope and dcvnslope dike '.vidchs . a. Calculate dowv.slc"e dike x.'idch US'."p steps H.l.a. L’.vounh H . : . f ;too: b Calculate upsdpc dike width using upslope -riound height .'ind dike multiplier from Page E-18; f ^ a^ u Add downslope dike width to upslope dike widch to rock layer width to get total mound wid ch ; fc+ fc+ fc= ft Compare total mound width to required basal widch from step G.-i . I: cocnr mound Jidch is grcat .r chan rccuired basal wide:', use calculr4tcc! dike widths. If required basal widch is greater chan total mound width, increase down.slope dike width. ^ <5* t^/1 •' ^ ,;/ >' <-F -" >; B. P'JMP SI- . PROCED'JRE A. Deter:nine pump capacitv 1. Minimum suggested is 600 gallons per hour CIO spm^ - to stay ahead of water »•: race 2. Maximum suggested for d .ive . ;o a dro^' box of a here system is 2700 gallon,-. *. ' ■ gpv to prevent buildup of pressure 1. .rup 3. Use value from des,Lgn ; or • ■ j- ib'.cion system SELECTED PUMP CAPACITY ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Determine head requirements; \j\ 7X5- 1 . 2. 3. r-1 . . ^Ei« 'arion dirference between pump and point of dis>. ;ar;:e If pumping to a pressure distribution sy,«ten, add 5 feet ” pressure requirea at manif-ald............................................ Friction loss ~ a. Enter friction loss table with gpm and pipe diameter. Read rriction loss in feet per 100 feet from page F-l.R F. L. * 5? ft/100 ft b. Deter. ^.,e total pipe length f. om pump to discharge point. Add 25 percent to pipe lenu'h for fitting loss, or use a fit:in,» loss chart. Enuivalent nine gpm fee 2> feet length r l.‘r^» ch = I .•</o o CJoIlu^jco ijr.il fricl'ioTi lo:;s by I c i p i v im; rricLiofi loss fr/lOO ■ (. ny oquiv.ilenc pine U-»n;zrh . Z25'Total friction loss Total haad required is the sum cf elevation difference, .special head requirements, and total friction loss. _____X -___51__+ 7 TOTAL HEAD....................................................................' . . '..................... /<T5 f -ot y .feet /9. 7 fa C. Pump selection 1. A pump must be selected to deliver at least 7S • S with at least 7 feet of total head. gpm D.To rtu.\imizc pump life ssl..*'‘t sump site for 4 to 5 pump operations per day. '■.ilcuL.atc drainb.i'k kh- 5«iV •ft .V '^Z \ •r: ■ M- 1. Determine tot."., n i.pe lengtli. 2. 3. ^ f ee c - /7. V? gallons perDetermine 1. id voLu.me o: pip'. 100 feet. !jce ^-18) Multiply length l-v volume: Drainback quantity = / ^ O feet X / 7. 3 gallons/'no ft » _ _/ 7 93 gallons Suggested drn irtac-c. quantity is 10 percent of pump '. quantity. A larger drainback percentage •will decreasa pump station efficiency slightly but o-umping e-ergy costs are usually a relacivel/ s-^ia 11 part of the total household enersy costs- ¥ % PtV- station ...K»s>-. i ■> ''■■ "ii Determine Surface Area Rectangle = Area = L x W ^ s_____square feet %Vid± LengOi Cirde = Area = it x (Badius)^ 3.14X_____X---------= —square feet Other » Get Surface Area trom Manufacturer sqtiare feet_____________________ ^ calculate gallons per inch j.. ^ Area x 8^4 -»■ 12 , i _____X 8.34+ 12 =______gallons/ircn r..iilons to Cover Pump (with 2 inches of water covering pump) (Height (in) + 2 inches) x gallons/inch ® =_____ gallons ()x Calculate Total Pumpout Volume (Section D on page f-15) gallons Cala.-»Ee Volume for Ala-:m (typically b mdies) Dench (in).. :;allons/inch = X____ =_____gallons Rescr.s Cipicr/ .Aiann Puxno Cn ai P\mpout Volume Caictiate Reserve Capacity (75% the daiiv ficvv; Daily tlow (see page D*7) x .75 = ____ X .75 «_____gallons Pump Height ^^tons ov^'pvSip + gallons pumpout s-gahons alarm + gallons reserve 1+4 + 5+6 ^^____________g^ons Total Depth (Totd gallon divided b Total Gailon+ gallon/inch inches n per inch) 9. Hoat Separation Distance (equal total pumpout volume) Total pumpout volume^ gallons/incdi a. = inches r.'f Location or Tmlcct ■/itlnuD Lcrr; o. a u c i 1 I: o r i r. r s •; ** i O b- U^JV-U C ‘ • - - I . ■ — --------------------------- Borinr-s raadc by R j<^ tr’/2 /O /y Q £R t':z.-------- Classification System: AASUO_ _ _; USDA-SCS Unlriec Dace ’1 ^ /2 - 9 d \ ocher “'•s' *.*Auj?ef used (check two)'. Hand or I’cvcr Flichc or Bucket ocher s::; ■ M \ ■■:k- ci;:- • ■*k ■ Depth, ; in feet Borinr, nurrher;L Surface elevation /yf. 6A0,M^ C.CJ'f COAfV\ 4 — ^ 7 — 8 — End of borin? at 9* 0 feet. Standing water table: IVescnt at _ _ _ _ _ feet of depth, hours after borinp. Kot present in boring hole < • •Mottled soil: Obscrvecl ac 3. feec of depth. ’ Hoc present In borlnp. hole —------ Observations and coirments. i v'-.! i.-' Depth, in feet 0 — Dor'nr number Surface cl evet:on 3 SCJC/^ CaA/'i^ ^'‘r L^A/^ e.----- 6 r%O feet.End of borine at Standing water table: Prcocnc at _ ___ feet of depth, hours after boring. Not prenenc in boring hole - -^^—.• .'•.o c 11 c d coil: Observed ac 2. ^ocr of dopch. Mot present in boring k.o_e 3bs e rvatior.s and cem-oncs: # •Trjr;:- .'■«• • *Ktm^-r”.'*^' ■'*1^;--Lopf^ of Soi l ii''':ij^S'.I i * w> m • Mt* Locn'^lor^Prn J e.c c 1./) t? f} Borinps made by ^r^2 ^JU h F ----------------- Classification System: MSHO _____; USDA-SCS Ur.iried Cate •7 - /2 - o cher ;?Auper used (check tvo): Hand X , or Pover - -; Flip'.t - -, or Bucket otner • W A > »Depth* : in feet 0 Dorinp nuirher; Surface elevation .<•fe ^. '•v;vv . ■ •. C‘;'. . . • «■■ i ' ■-' cc<fr cajt^ [ • w t'- i-.-A. * ‘>- ■■Ifev S' f. W’’ *.7 — 8 — :?r ?' End of borin? at y.d?cec. W' m ■ • *i■tea:- Standing water cable: IVesent at______ feat of depth, W'hours after borinp. Sr :. Not present in borinp hole _^!l^ lef. '^: :s.,s.p;- & *;■ te Mr- Mottled soil; Observed at -3*. of depth. Not present In bortnp. hole -- - - - Observations and corrrvc:'.ts*.^ 1 Cept!^, in feet r\ Borinr nur.ho: f Surface elevation n —— 3 — c___ b — Zr.d cf borir.e at I'tandinc v;ater t Present at ..cat feet of' depth , hours after borinn. Not present .n borinp hole >'311led soil: Observed at _fcQC of depth, i :iot present in borln.". hole -- - -- Ohscr'.fationr cni corj-ionts: ■ifetr 'K'' m- w;'-’. PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET / / ^Percolation test readings made by —/,/ C/jOd—— LJ. Lr„A^L':=.-------or—2—Li-— Test holf-^ ------------------- Hole number ----/------------Du'.e hole ’.vr.s picp.ircu. /a.m. p in. 7 - //.-•/'i> A Depth of hole Hnttr>nn / ^ inches. Diamctcr of holc. Soil data from test holc: Depth, inches A iitd’.cs So;i tcM’jrc ti}0 f- n /L- fS Method of scratching sidewall. f/try' 4? /; / *x .inches f :l#’ f <• i ■V- ^ b. I'- 0- ‘ ll- i- t f:. d' I- Depth of gravel in bottom of hole------------- Date and hour of initial v ater filling?**/.?—^-Z^. Depth of initial water lill!ng_ Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hoic for at least 4 iiou J ? inrl'.ffs above holc bottom I- L .. Ma.vii'.’.uin water Jcpt.i above holc bc.tori during test 'o/ ■ineliV. _y Time Time interval, minutes Measurement. inches Drop in water level, inches 1 Percolation rate, minutes per 1 inch Remarks 9.30 K r F > L L i rj,/>u - ! j r I ,<• % _________, \ ! /.3 0 h) N //■- ^ ,ry./ :□1 /i /=■/'/ L L. . , mJ ,mL, ■■ . 2J^i y II /dV<> — -r i-}L f'-t / 2 .H ^9 ^V iiL___,7.38 1 / .?. / 8 / » / f 9 '9n.■7 '9/1 1 ^ U —r ^ ! 1 •- ’ i \ ^ ' i Percolation rate 1-5'^ y.ct jiunutes per inch. IrV'-r'^'-: ?•'/.'K'v ‘ &■ ^te it pi t^%- 'i '' ''. ■• > Isfe r??v K^' i’ 5^-- ;*:/ V P.^M i:i--: :^C- ’0‘- ■fft" PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET Pcrcolaticn test readings made by Test hole location , /Vtl L..H U..^ DdAj (^jP // /j f P .oa 7jlL2-1A,,stnitin'* aL /. -T O i iitJirf a :h pin. Depth of hole bottom.y-r- _______________ H( Ic number— inches, Diameter of hole____^--------ind'.cs ^_______ Date hole was prnn:.. ntl "7 ^ ^ Soil data from test hole: Depth, inches Soil texture d C/iCfc Cdjr*y r./y CJyjn^ /L-/S Method of scratching sidewall — Depth of gravel in bottom of hole_____ 3C A /hT^ U inches ^,30P,M- _ Date and hourot initial waer filling "7 "“j 2 T^yl, Depth ofinitia. u a!-;r tilling—jnehes above liole bottom Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 i-.ours ,, Maximum v.a:er dentit aboNe I’.ole bettont during res'.7'%/vuLy Time L2jO. <A <20 2^0 3 00 SJIA Time interval, minutes Mcasurerr.ent. inches Drop in ".ate: le'.cl, Indies Percolation rate. minutes per inch .Remarks 7 ^ // /a/ / I / » / // ) LifllLikiu < /7 5£h La y-X? I 9sU -VL 4 . J A ^ L Ft LL 1%f:7. 7 -v_; Percolation rate 7 r .miriuccs per »nch P'"' . r■ •f t • • # kV-*' ^vf. v^.‘ V •i ■ .-.• •, • W' ' I. vyi',. i?^:r iI"'' '1-. ■ ,V, -^; & 3. ■ ■Ij3,rv V:y &: ry:‘. ^r.-l < : ■. ■k-.. il^^' [■ 'A l**' . ■ ' A- r ‘ ■i, L PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET Percolation test readings made by ^ k* ^ - -----c:“_2 —13^.5t;iilir. ' at./ 2-?.::v>—*'a n.m. Test hole locatioa /I f ) C> lO Depth of hote bottom.L33 in' hes, Diameter of hole . Hole rnmbcr___^ ^____inches ., Date h.olc was p:eparcd ■1-17--9 7 Soil data from test hole; Depth, inches Soil tc.xiurc G~yo fllAC y / Ca /a-/s Method of scratching sidewall ----EiCij! /}^C ^■■■^- Depth of gravel in bottom of hole.—inches^.2ch.n Date and hour of initial water filling 7'' / 'r'"^p. . Dep'h of initiai water fillin I ■?.inches above hole bottom Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 liours . Maximum wa:cr depth ^bovc hole boilcm dui mu test 7'/-;m* f.'v.r /__//.incli Time Time interval, minutes Mcesurtment. inches Drop in wate.' level, inches Percolation r-jte. minutes per incli 1 Remarks 1 9 ? 7) I f^r. F, L L ; 1 7/}/7n ^ t * / / f ^ '/ ?£>s'k f.yo Z 0 M ) fj kWi - 5^R r-P] L n zo / ' M -----^------------------=!U_J,{--------- - L 5?1 1 2 ..^0 /I i i 9 k - t-7^? yx: □F'.cy 1 ! 3.ZO ; « \ 1 9 ^/,L J v/i, ./ ?1 mr i ,*r* ..r:_—---------------------- p— 1 • 1 ... . —i——----------------------—I i i_________________________ $ ------------------------------------------ ! Percolation rate Tninu.as per inch. t if <-4* ■ V’ ifc m-: »'.’^':v' PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET p:Percolation test readings made hy -f) /O A) t) ^ in------ Test hole location__c/ U ,h------------------------------Hoie number. .on 1-/3 stariin'.’ at (Miirl / n na.m. p.m. Depth of hole Hnirn m / ^inches. Diamctci of hole---------^ / .;r.chcs ^_____Da: : hoie was prcpiiic d ?_**/ ^^ ,iu ■^:fr f'h Soil data from test hole; « Depth, inches Soil tcxiur i:\-y/^e)r / JAr- /l‘/S • ■ '-K-- ' •'V -'■''' • ii©''#g- - V .•• ;S . *•*■-». * *, T'va/‘ -a;- ,v.' Method of scratching sidewall — Depth of grave! in bottom of hole. < f ^ A 7^, ly r /> _inches^ ^ Date and hour of initial water filling^ **/" Depth of initial uaicr filing / 7 .incites above itoie bottom Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole fur at least 4 hours.p,'L } . Maximjiu w..:ar depth above hole bo::oivt doling icsl 7 %F .mcliV__y -P-'v ' ft?- <•t. rL . V-‘ ■■ li .! ?•:; • t- S. . P' -ir' I'.., Time Time internal, minutes Measurement, inches Drop in '.vater ievei, incites I Percolation r-.r.*1 w.„ , minmas per 1 inch i j Rem.trks 'f. Id '! iyPirr.-p/ I ! r /t n>'» -------------------»*', f—*"*.*■ ' ' ! .2H!I 7w I 1 rss 3 0 M \h)<' I j 3 2S » t I »/,. 4- 7-P s>h I rvr / » 4? .rs*• « / •! -* r ” % ! jT 7 ?/ ; 9 \ i I I // >4 , -r %• ! ! !i 1! I ' -« , I « ( .I •U- -V ■-------------------------------- I I i Percolation rate *_■? 3—minutes per inch. el • * I.PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET f ■■. ■I 15 • Percolation test readings made hy..jC^ A/ })-ir P.. — Test hole location //i^ / Ph ,D------------------------Hole number '7-/T-O0nn , ^ ^^ 21 / am. p.m <j4itrl £T . Date hole was pi'"p-irt»rl J ~* ^ 7* 3 Depth of hole bottom.inches, Diameter of hoi'A .incites ■«. Soil data from test hole: Depth, inches Soil ic.xtur: Hi /?L^CAf » ,''A ■• i'*Method of scratching sidewall.■ ?.> /p;iT- Z /= /? Depth of gravel in bottom of hole.ro # Date and hour of initial wate: filling / * •* Depth of nitial .vaicr tilling-----1 ■ ..j ------mehes above iiole bottom Js ‘T ^ ^) )Method used to maintain a', least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 l ours ,v 4.^—C.J -r=——t i.•i'i ■-.. . .Ma.\iinum 'va::r depth, above hole bot:o;r. during te.o.7 '!/i .iiicii\._y 'U V-" Time fA-fl '3^2 5" /.7? JLJLZ .^JLZ Time i.ntervai, minutes Mcasuremer.t. inches m.<9Af JAf / i « * 7 S2 7.? 2 I I I » / i r- l|? H ^;v.' -:• l' '- :'.V. Wr. Crop in wa.er levc.. incites Percolation r • 1%I %• * I nt;nuics per inch Remarks EjlELLL. lk£JZ- /. / < y • // , —' /;/ ¥3l Ks-ElUr. lA^L crL - u- j^l 3V^i M ? ---- t-“y>'/f. 7 P',2 7 •AJ Percolation rate *«_2*_Z_2—minutes per inch. It'. ■A' i' ,’4 f ■■«* ..>■■.ii- ’ :^ ... Time Time interval, minutes Measurement, inches « Drop in w ater le\ei, incites i Percolation 1 ! rate, n il. !tcs per i’’ h !‘lcn\j2ks 1 9 ?Z>.1 i /r*“ / " / ! TA p ..- / !< ■7.?7 ___s7/f, \ ; 1 .../ tS iff_____2.^ H) hJ 3 ij/n - .-T %R p F:Ll ^ 3.U 2 0 h f'nf Hi _yy \ 1 > 3 XL 1 • i /Jx’jj. - s'lz _r>A/7 /, t 3.7L n f 1 fn s% 1j---------^—t------------------------- .r, j?' <-f i ! - • r , ,i -k \ 1 ! &■ V?- k;- V.I-. t.' ft- I >i‘ L.< *l^f- |r ti' I?: f ■■ ■sf ':4‘ Mfe- 5r. i:. %■ L*‘,**v. r?-..f ♦T- i ' ■ ev f-' .'r t, > (•'! f--‘. 'A t f f i r.V,- O :v?)A*.A *, •:♦v-'.^ Z > x» X z ;pm > \ -c> m O JJ o 2) m 73 •o 73 O T3 > O o s 2 c. >1 o m u rsj 73 P“ in Q m 2 X m ^ ► r- H C/) ► m M 73 73 2 -♦ M 5|S C- O w O 03 C/3 O\M 73 0> W »-• n I m H* in in \M in sO 7! O O :30 o o 73m 5^ CD I l» \M m 2 73 M nm </) M O O o in -4 o C33 ■HI O O o o o o M U4 O "^3 2 > g 73 > X 2 O 2 -O m 73 m > 7) \ -< , > ► m o O 73 > O O 77 73 m r— M o cnn|2SS O in C C m 9 c -H N t O N I O D W CD W Oo 5? Ztn M Zm M 73 C3 r~ n oi in \M in O' o n o o 73 73 73 73 O O 73 73 > > I l-rf CP ^ 03 -< I in M U4 o r» J> iM 3D C3 O O O CD s? 73 73 O O 73 73m in 73 J> tn (/) H H > > -4 m m o o O) o IH (J3 KM 1 -< m i> > ss «9 m > z o C- S3*- a o m m 73 73 H H > Oo 73 m </3 to IS> X* > Z or- m -<to to ►H o oo o IH m a 2 X 73 in r- o to o X -H H II > > cn 10 o w O OB O IH OD M ** Im m in z in X (0 rs) -H X 7) 73 m rr* M M m m 3D 73 10 toss 73 73 O O >o CO 73meoto CD i fs> IH ro ► ss to M X X oo o X z > > X 2 73 m ► \ -< j> m a » o 3D O 73 2 o m 73 30 n* Z a »* o 2 73 m 2 X >* »-• t; X r- ui m X 73 J> f— -H m ►-« S3 Z Ho 3 5 2 2 o o O iM X CP > »> m m r- r- vn iH 1-4 I 30 73 »* D* in in (H in 30 O 2 2 > > 30 3T -C -C > CP -H I m fs> 7 IH O X 5 m m 73 73 r- r-> 5 5 5 o 30 O O M M O O j>Q O > > O L7 n m o w r CP -J IH CPr- *-i r- r- X m o o 3i•U > 13 X» 73 in in L7 O' ;0 171 rr > O O 30mto CO I M rsB IH I X toto l-l .3 *D O M I a *1.% •«'* H O T3z > ^x» X z o 2 73 rn 73 m > » \ -c ^ > m 2 O O 73 > C3 O 2 » JO m f— 73 o o f) CPo r- X X> X U4 m vj M ►-« n r> > > 73 73 M M H H P» > r- f“ M M SS in in IH ina* O IH X OB KM in in o O' I CD 1-1 > -< » to rs> ►H o m .v> 33 O O Oo 2 X > o 73 fv> r- in m 73 > f> m »-• 30 ==3 e t- X (0s-m to H O > Z 30 O IH X CD O fNJ S/1 C4 I iD C3 m n -< 71 X -* > o -H J pn *s> X 14« in »n IM LI >0 X X O Mnm O X 5^ o X o o ^ 2 X> o X X ^ inr.'' X X > m m > > X X C KM X- ro o X in Z Z 7- ^ m IH X Z H O CO o o s§ in in IH in X Xo >r- > CB H I m rs) X IM 5 X o X o o o VH H O X Z 3» Z X > X Z O 2 X m X m i> X X < > > m 2 CO O X o O 2 73 X rn C3 >» Hn X oo 'si 2 > 2 X> o X LIr~ o m cs X > r- •<> to 1-1 Z o m Q > -< z O 2 no O 9 er O IH X CPo ino o cn 2 X >< 1-1 Om »-■ I po VH inin U4 in yQ 70 a -3 c o X X M r* o m 33 X > P- -< ^ CO -H M z om n o ii -i to to t* #• m m Xo M M N Ns sm m H H in in IH in yC O tM X OB O O O I 03 M > -4 -< I to IS) M iM CB m M M Xo o o r* r- m PT oa* < < is o O' 4 o I • r-i ' ■ 1 •:? immm • ■• «P»i Mi>W ■ • * ■»*■■■"■«- • - • • . , ■«—I ..—.I r\^ M .i.« ■k ■t'' , r ■ir>. JT. ’i Y.V, 'ji'-'-T fr',-v 7a?#’"iW'. • V- ■ mM ':%^v Pl|i^ :^: v;v^ rv ‘ • &*V.-V • . i##mm Kfe IP'" i- iiL v '; feTi' ■■ .Tij;-.^.;T^>,r • > ■ '/fe-.'7'#^*';’'■^pT^'fe'.. fe: ;S^ ;^>V. "?f®’P i'I? '7 A-.'^w,. V*' i«#>-M?'V- M~'^mrnBi’^k * •' ft'"tr:7r---: fm-k'tS' ■ ■ '•'-r'7P - -. • •>'. • ■* '•r- . V;Pt.7'_ t-^.»;.-' 7 5ffS- Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Dmtmi SubjectI Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager March 9, 1992 #1719 Henry Brantingham, 3185 County Road 6 Public Hearing i^u^NCIL MEETING MAR 2 3 1992 -eimptnioNO Itartinent Ordinance Section 10.28r Subdivision 5 (B). variance is required. A rear lot line setback Required Existing Proposed Variance 50' 44.6’ 40’ 10’ or 20% List of Sxhibits - A - Application B - Survey C - Remodel Plan D - Property Owners List E - Plat Map F - Septic Inventory Mat> G - Existing Floor Plan Description of Request The applicant proposes an addition to the principal structure to the east and south, encroaching further into the required rear setback. The existing structure is currently 44.6’ from the rear lot line and the proposed addition would bring this home approximately 40* from the lot line (Exhibit B). The proposed addition will extend the house foundation over an existing well pit. This well should be properly abandoned and inspected by the Minnesota Department of Health, if it hasn’t been already, before construction begins. The well currently used for this dwelling is approximately 15' west of the well pit. The existing septic system consists of two odO gal. concrete block tanks, one 500 gal. precast concrete pumpir.tj chamber, and 1,320 s.f. of drainfield. The pumping chamber and new drainfield were added in 1983 with no septic problems noted since. The proposed expansion will not impact the septic system. ■t illNG mr-r-;'!;' A f''-=7-■ '^r'fSii"^>: ■%; Zoning Pile #171S , March 9, 1992%l*vlijiif of Hardships \0B^: Please review Exhibit A. The applicant’s information indicates that the existing house does not meet the required 50' rear lot line setback and no other add on space is available for this structure. Staff would add the following comments; Expansion is limited to the north by the septic system and limited to the east and west by nature vegetation. The existing water supply well limits expansion to the west also. k: ■ -1 mm RiiifS' *} .'^1 Additional Connents and Planning Coomlssion Recoanendation March 19, 1992 The Planning Commission voted unanimous approval of the .proposed variance. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation. 'i'- lav ./V . . jii i "'-if 111Hi, rrV'v '^-rr f:.. -T- 7._Tw..t>•'■ V 'ii--.' & v\: • n•^^^;• m-M ■ fe.m^:m A RBSOLOTION GRANTING A VARIANCB TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.28, SUBDIVISION S (B) PILE #1719 ;_v’; WHEREAS, Henry Brantingham (hereinafter "the applicant”) is owner of the property located at 3185 County Road 6 within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally das'cribed as follows: ..^3?';V That part of the west 371.31 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 28, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying south of the centerline of Hennepin County State Aid Highway Number 6, Plat 5, per Document Number 3844152. (hereinafter "the property"); and i#.#f WHBREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (E) to permit the construction of the addition to the south side of the existing residence. MOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGSm- 1. 2. 3. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1719. The property is located in the RR-IB Zoning District. ■'? '■A is The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on March 16, 1992, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings: A. '■m’ r - V ’ . J: AA- V A,r:^ : The existing house does not meet the 50' rear lot line aetbac)c and no other add-on space is available for this structure. B. : ;S- K'L.-f- J ■ % -, j- Expansion is limited to the north by the septic system and limited to the east and west by mature vegetation. The existing water supply well limits expansion to the west also. m ■4:-- mm Page 1 of 4 1 grmu ^Sv- ii m- * *&■: . If'^' iil-'^V' MkPW>v. |» pi? itr- ii||> • i\-, % v ;li- i»! P:.te%1® m. irHi ii WfiBi ;|£c-e V-V'-,«>/■ ■ V.iKr^.-: iilte- I® iKi#:il'^ ®&S- •V';-. '.•■■' m-mupt= »fe>;- '.i- P>V^ .’ .■ B-.^-,. ■- p. ppap. Np-p" mr m.i»fSrp? 4.The City Council has considered this npplication including the findings and recommendatvons of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5.The Citj Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to che applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLDSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the construction of the proposed addition to the existing residence, subject to the following conditions: 1,Upon the filing of the building permit for the proposed construction, applicant shall provide a final survey including the proposed addition and existing water supply well location. 2.Prior to the issuance of a building permit, applicant shall provide proof that the well pit has been abandoned and inspected by the Minnesota Department of Health or evidence submitted indicating that the well has already been abandoned and inspected. 3.Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are per.*nissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (March 23, 1993). Page 2 of 4 TT -«»1 - 4’'p:iil-J?r il'i" !»'■ hm^ 1 |sK:'rii#'^ r'.:- Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. i“r'i V 5.The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of March, 1992. i myw^’ATTEST: 'r: V.iir IDorothy M. Hallin# City Clerk Barbara A* Peterson^ Mayor - _ : . Property Owner(s) STATE OP MINNESOTA ) 0 )ss. COONTY OP HENNEPIN ) .,r « ,“4 ‘ - yf y ‘ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 23rd day of March 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Ballin, Mayor k City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 4 iy ............................... ->%■>■ ip- »v iil f;^.. STATE OP MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ss. day of 199On this ___________________ — ____________________________— before wm a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the peraonTiT described in and who executed the foregoing Inatrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as hie (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC ■j'* STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) W'^wm ^ meOn this ________________ day of _____________________r before u.^ a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared _____________________________________________ known to me to be the pereof*^*) in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. ft..Ill 'W%-mW' NOTARY PUBLIC m ill :'*r- r5# ■ ?x>:-£k Page 4 of 4 n- m I ■:!*» ^ IL^: ji i ti i I'll'V CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) #1719 cnT€LOiiQHO Fim^CE OFFICE A %J%J 0200000 01 t w V/U.I t fTC- / 4 f w’ • V Lrr\*f 7* .i / w • i PROPERTY INFORMATION l2ci^ &rrc7&T^TUMrf(' vm; iluuuAi i itfriitiS I Uij WVVl MWi I V A- ■ • V«»# te i- 'X r: ',r. Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) 2^* Attach legal deacription to application if not dlncluded on required survey. Date PxgpeJSty-Afquired (month/year) I own the adjacent parcels of land. Preaent use of property: x residential _ _other (specify) Zoning District:^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ rrr^- APPUCAHT Phone (home) t : y,}- ife-; ? - Name /45»-lig« Phone (woric) ,^S3~7/S) Address: J^/2J 6? City: UOjrV',_____ ZiP- Phone (home)ONNBR (if different than applicant) Name Phone (work) f I, ■rV • i!' H Address:City:Zip: fe- y V ■ OBSCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: _ Estimated Construction Cost $ [r~(i rAv 0 i: • • '■**■*- ri y-.i|..1 UC^IFiOCM ^ __ tl' ^ % VARIANCES REQUIRED v^V Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage ''. I X Setback:Front V Rear _ Average Lakeshore mr Other (specify) •J-: ^ " mtDSHIP/DBSCRlPTICni OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual propert requirements: y ) /y^— rjirt&Jt • IJOUV. /i A^fieAir^ /rt ''' Describe undue narasnip or pracx.j.v,a j. ai-u j. «-j « conditions preventing compliance with Zonii^ Coda luuaj^' I i.yy ^ I ''' ' • Cti ^-------------------------.. ^ JLti/- O (attach additional sheets if necessary) hqdibed subhittals folloiflnq infonaation auat be siitaitted by bhe application Am^^m <ii order for your application to be considered ccapletei V CCTPpleted Application Form yl^Ttified Property Owners List of owners within 150’ (you must obtain p-'V '*•± this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy SH^xll" for m I reproduction). Aropographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any i'm- '■■•r ' i ff’ & changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8Ju"xll"). 6. V Sketches or plans of floor 6 elevation views (provide 1 copy 8*j"xll"). iSikKm an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above 4 tiVormatioo has not been included. iM AmJCAMT'8 SIGMATORB The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or yequmstmd by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to_the best /bf ;^is/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date 0HBB8 8ZaOkTmB The owner hereby ackowledges and ag^e^j^to this application and further authorises reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultantSr agents# Comoiission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of Shift Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Cosmiission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Ap^ic^nts eust be present at all scheduled review meetiJigB of Planning C^emassion and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorised agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. li'"' leWi ttj ''*'■* • »fe"?L ■ ?r^v.. % "1wS#*J 1 - .f^''tsfibi 71 m0li^:' *''r s- ir* DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY Rights of subjects ofV? * In accordance with M.S. 13«04r Subd. 2r data”* wa would like to inform you that your request for a permit or : • ''I ‘'Jwit : ■'.: -You are notified that: isf; ■ ■' .;u' f,.;' ■ ■ ‘s>>t ii; }•■# ■■■ fc. yy'^v r-y IK 1. The information you furnish will be used^to determine your 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. a^Vn°=r,r.^°\."‘^.xrenf license. -i 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 's 5. You have certain rights under M.S. 13.04 to review private data on yourself. j 6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. First liddle ■=^f V=; <Lau^ P(3al> *Atfaress (Otz^o >C CiW State A Zip fh </7/^ -<y^ / OTe Ss I understand my rights as stated above. te'Jr?.® W f:li; *' i' ■ li|l-'lili*"t'V' V-- - ' *ir.: •• my L mMy- yW’r lis * s»% S??;-- V. . i»'.# ^mm ^$0^. HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSH SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' Existing Hardcover in Zone 75-250' 25Q-5CQ'C^0-10j0:.^ M 4 A. House LENOTH X X WIDTH - — = y(s{y> S.F S.F X m S.F, X .S.F. X .3 S • ^ • B. Garage X .- .yyyo S.r . c. Driveway -----f--------------- (X ./(P . K.'Xi S.F. X ,S.F. D. Sidewalk —^X ,. /‘^P S.F. X .m S.F. '• > X .a S.F. E. Patio / Deck 7JO X _^0 1. S.F. R.Landscape _ X _s S.F. AREAS UNOCHLAIN BY ,- X _S.F. PLABTIC 8HCCT1NO•- X S.F. • - - X m S.F. B. Other . X - S.F Total Hardcover in Zone S.F. Total Property Area in Zone S.F. B B -si •V •■ x'lOO % .A • r- V • w P^^;: ^... Is|s; .rf-:, L‘;v>.;.y Ilif&El^mrm. . :;.ir^: VI-/ i, • .--.- ■^- i,:-l iii|||l|iw»gg»» b- :\K'K;': I Qjv« 1» s ? 1 fjji, ' i'" ‘ ■••, m ly.. 4 ’> f>'tf. | ;lt i' f '';v>^ m. f,<- ; '(i". ■■ ;: - " 'A-. • b ■, ,;* a ., i^i“' XI? ,j / m./ ■vJ-'-' Hi®fe;;k'*vf.' ^0-' .■ •• ^ b'- ' * - vJ la •i “*** \I i! • %«l I ) *T i} 9^ ri Iii^ iMt i<llli ■■ t •>* Hiv-. ' •-.■•• B-'•^^■ •. • . . . ■: ?-;v - ^‘’^''4'''-: ■•.. '■-fi?'V y-f;'-:' L-.^- ;.-jyt;. ■■■^v:’ ^ '■■•'! ■_______: --------------------------------_ [A • V !- * _______________ ’t' sr ADDRESS CODE __ CITY OFORONO SEPTIC SYSTEM INVENTORY CARD ; ’• X T ‘I :r > ; '■* ) k A\Jer /J.Property I D. 3'L. OOOC, Leqal Cetcription - 7000 ^iCstandard trench □ Mound Syelem type □ Other Permit Wo.*7^ S ^ Date ot permit ^rt / (c~~ Intulier 6*-* R/CC>5 No. Bedroom* •uNdInt type *Pa»rgtr>mKJcL^ or GPO J2.-1 &lZ. Laundry Date Connected to Municipal Sewer Dishwasher Gorbage Disposal SEPTIC TANKS; Metorlel - C<?<^C I^C cck - Cenacltv 1) ^ S Q 2) S~<£) f'/rccnsr Ci3l/eT^,Sei.iC> Oct . y'^3 ' I>iA»^ , Propw outlet end Inlet Bel (let ot^-zvcio f~‘»'C. Liquid depth to RO level S ~_______L2~" Helfht of tenk bottom ebove tweter teble ^7}^' Distance to nearest building __tzS^___:r^_________ L»,» ;-■ iPa fv" r.J S‘** "••■in Ir rVl li Si; ir * V.-: klNFIELO: TotsI length of llnet ^^_______Number of lines Trench width Ir I^Otri treeunent area (tq. ft.) _____Height of drainfield above water table 3 Type of filter materiel^C^'/C Soil type /-Ohrt'^ j Y Dlitenee from neereat bldg. ^C? •*• Til# siza ^_____Parc rata________fLifie____V,mln/in Depth of fHI over dreinfleld B-/Z-Depth of rock over tile uf^der tile C-!Z )9 )<5 w ^ m#• 2 ^5 ceo Eo s % GC **Cto I :n sRl •Ca sn .Jr C fOe« S ei^a S Eo 8c IS t :3 V/^ Em 5 >- I ^ I 3 OL %o fh. rS £ TJ 5 a I/ t- t V.- m ..P|#v^- f. k • ' i.- piy- ’■ .. A INSPECTION RECORD DATE mmmnm0mm0m • /AZ.*y»B2. PUMPOUT RECORD COMPLIANCE DATE gallons ’4HM 6-2g-g^* /A) STM.LA’rjoK^ Qf^ ^-C-gkP ^ L-/5-RI /5'OQ kz._L2j^ 4_m_ ;n- /io Sm<P/\cit)C> NoT£6 ^hEb^Di Jia s^risunih^.______2 c-F'/B- «7 7- If ■ r 7~/2-'^0 fOnn tif I - - I ■ - - - -I includf ' i Well location pz 0. Q 2 O'stence from ^nuft to c-CONFORMING S - SUBSTANOAMD N NON^ ON^ ORVIINO vp^pf'C tenkt, d’Sf t>on, anc) Jiai'^field 3» Noftn ar'ow and road '.tjm0 tr* wAmiL \*«kik ^t'i '•? F5$ "iTfl, k It:: mir rmyi‘Usr- . * A ^ JS- IK?^ ^•^ •■•••'••••»■ V. i ;■■,'■■^•'i. ,-, ' «*: -^^Mirir mi yy> •* ■ ^'1'. • iSS'.;:^ V \ ir.' ''j*;-* • - «f.-:\M'" ■*^-' • • " •:t5f. • • • i? '- I* 'rr'5 ■'. • •• ■ t-Jji •• •* .' ■ "."^M . 'i I'v'-'- :' • i ^1 •-M- •• •■«•• ! ■•'^^ ’ • ■ »Vv,.. .’ ’ ; V •f’'4'' 4 • •* .*;•. s.. .. • \r^’ r\* / *•.•w ••-*i !*■ .*• ■'. S' ‘ iV'"' *'* . ’ • *• **.#' . r* * * V , • 4 ' •» . « ■ ' • •>:■'• r-» f*. A » fj ..■ -.v'. ' ...•’ L*f • A i .. . & k. > *. <.. . .Ik *» •* # * • • •••• •; ■■■'; V^ ' * *1#** • * j* ^^ • ■• •• / -yV ».., • '• •• t • • •' / V - VWtf-.' • ■•.V; .1. •/ .: ;• , . • • . • * • • , j • • 'j »•-. ’• ^ • • . • : «•: , • • r- * * s.' V - I V* v'lV "•■■ • location '•V^ J 4 V* « V U »V i 1 - .» ^ * '?Vr/y • *‘ X . •» • '- » Br*.pi>:fpm^-p-' ■'Vm- ‘1^ >: . . ■•¥>■ -.'a. r ;• i >V - -m. K'''..|g!^’ :(■:■ f~ r 1 p.. .r" ■s^ey fei?’" t'S-'jf S^.;;r;' ?wl' :||'Mr If .S’ 5^ f.i ^m- I’pl' t- ii .■ -j.-.4V*:' ■ y-> , v : •• ‘ :> '■■HS: •;-^. i ' Tot Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator ?c. Date: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Administra March 10» 1992 .ERNG MAR Z 3 199? tor CiTYOFORONO ibjaets #1720 City of Orono, Section of Fox Street Located Between Orono Orchard Road South Brown Road - Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 - City proposes filling and grading activities in excess of 100 cubic yards. Total proposed project involves the filling of 700 cubic yards of fill to expand shoulder area of Fox Street, Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 - Pilling will take place within a portion of a protected DNR wetland and City designated wetland where no filling activities are allowed. Filling of a MR protected wetlands will require review and approval of both DHR and MCWD before project can begin. Llet of Exhibits A - Harlan Olson Report of March 9, 1992 B - Certificate of Mailing 8- List of Affected Property Owners C - Profile of Existing Roadbed & Area To Be Filled 0 - liocation Map Reviaw of Application Please refer to enclosed Exhibit A, Mr, Olson reviews the need for the proposed improvement project. Staff must ask that the permit not be scheduled for review and action by the Council until the DNR and MCWD have had adequate time to review the proposal. The project is to be completed by Public Works personnel. All work shall follow the guidelines set forth in the City Engineer's report and performed per final approved plans^ for th** expansion of the roadbed. Erosion control shall be maintained through the entire project until disturbed area is restored to natural state. The Planning Commission may wish to add other conditions to the approval. jib Zoning File #1720 March 19, 1992 Page 2 Additional ConBKnts and Planning CooBission Re ndation m: ... Staff has scheduled the City of Orono application for review at the March 23rd meeting prior to the approval of the DNR and MCWD, so that the road repair and reconstruction of Fox Street can commence without any further delays. The resolution has been written such that the City cannot commence the installation of the improvements until permit approvals have been granted by both agencies. }r'ft iv ij The Public Works Department has within the last month attempted to clean out an old culvert installed under the railroad that has had an impact on the Browns Bay wetlands. On March 9th an elevation reading was taken of the water level on both sides of the railroad track and it appeared the water level had dropped .4'. Recent visual inspection also confirms a lowering of water level. The Public Works Department is continuing the search for other culverts under the railroad but as of this date they have been unable to locate any Others. ■ ' There has been a major undermining of the road from the high waters of the wetland not just during this wet season but from previous wet seasons. Fox Street has never been designed with adequate shoulder area. The proposed improvement will now provide 8* wide shoulders providing greater safety for users of the roadway and greater stability for maintenance purposes. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted for Council's review and action. ■ ■ i-f ■■-J. .:1k - ^ r-V k-• *• f '; S#: ' ^ Hi""' Jrv !:■; II# te. pIP •If:...ii. H'l- - V r. lpp- ItIH mm.. A RSSOUmon GRAHTIIIG A VASIAMCB TO SBCTIOR 10.55, SOBDIVISIOH 8 AND A CONDITIONAL OSB PERMIT PER SECTIONS 10.03 SDBDIVISION 19 FILE #1720 NBBREAS, the City of Orono has an interest in the public road known t»s Fox Street; . /ii' 'WHBEBASr per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 8, the City has made application for a conditional use permit and variance to allow the filling of wetlands adjacent to 1,000 lineal feet of Fox Street resulting in 700 cubic yards of fill material to be placed within a designated wetland where no such filling activities are allowed. mm- .» Minnesota t NON, THEREFORE, BB IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, iiir.1. 2. FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1720. WlK The property is located in the RR-IB Zoning District adjacent to a designated wetland of the City of Orono and protected wetland of the Department of Natural Resources. 3. m III tet':'- The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on March 16, 1992 and recommended approval of the proposed variance and conditional use permit, based on the following findings: a) ite:-.mm:-. The proposed fill area will protect the in place public road. Hfe:- myi- A wider shoulder area will protect the motoring traffic oy increasing the reaction zone and keeping cars away from the edge of the wetland. W:'S«'m. The water level near the edge of the roadway has and will continue to cause damage to the subgrade and bituminous surfacing if the expansion of the shoulder area is not permitted. Page 1 of 3 u h'. ^k''f'Ls\E V ‘-V 4. 5. 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions# light# air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant# but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the filling of the adjacent wetlands to allow the expansion of the shoulder area of Fox Street will not be detrimental to the health# safety or general welfare of the public# would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties# nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendation of the Planning Commission and reports by City staff# and the effect of proposed improvement on the health# safety and welture of the community. CONCLOSIOHS# ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings# the Orono City Council hereby g-ants a variance per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.55# Subdivision 8 and a conditional use permit per Section 10.03# Subdivision 19 to allow the filling of approximately 700 cubic yards of fill within an adjacent wetland of Fox Street for a distance of 1,000 lineal feet. This approval is subject to the following conditions: The City cannot commence the road improvement until the required permit approval is received from both the Department of Natural Resources and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Page 2 of 3 2.Erosion control shall be maintained throughout the entire project until all disturbed areas are restored to natural or original state. 3. Hi Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, s‘ 11 automatically terminate any authority granted here , and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. f i '7 The Mayor or authorized agent of the City, has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution on behalf of the City, its successors and assigns. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 23rd day of March, W- A¥TEST: . ■ mpyr v-i- Dorothy M. Ballin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor r'7.;^7 ^ ^TB OF MINNESOTA SB .urnm COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 23rd day of March, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor 6 City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. ■■ Notary Public A.* *.y: Page 3 of 3 r ^ ■■■% ■-# . .»■. ■ ♦; ♦ ^■> 'i^f^'V'-yi':' yhf*y . fej ■ 'j A" ■ ■ .iM- 1/ j Bonestroo ^jg Rosene WTB AnderHk & Associates Gngineers & Architects Ti 3cn«roc riiHr* AixJpr-..^ e£ ••=♦ ^5 ' Act: t '^rr^ •'£ 5 C jo* '•v*c^as t •€ «ODen G ic^tincni. *»E So«c' VI * VvrV'^ •' A *o«e *'* •* '' • ^kKifOor \u=« * x- »E C av ^'.‘.ICOIA '.''f^ * * » •'■^o =6 MC’ je- * 4nDecT « - E W“jr . P ^t- VA"« * •'’• r • : — ■'* V*Ac* • ^'- -r •>- ^ i »V<^ V* \V '^i "f 4 A*'-'. *'* *'v' *■« • ■ \?e'v:v * % '■ \v**' •* *E C ^'^AT • % \/>ei V ^ ♦ C • =v-r. • .•.■ ,- " . ^- ye jA-\ 4 V*<T <r» Xer>^ ? '^jp© i»E \<n •'AC P <Ai. ’€ ^•^Anei A 6- X4WT cfO M HAT’A^ 4* Otfor V PE »- .'-•t -'f-V March 9, 1992 ili' ’ f.'h [f|,. iii.City of Orono 66 Oystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Jeanne Mabusth y"m,': ; (p^-Re City of Orono ’s Application #1720 BRA FUe No. 139-1720 Vipp ■m ,v"/' [p®' I:' Dear Jeanne: • A Enclosed please find a location plan and proposed cross-section of the shoulder area being filled on Fox ftreet. The fill area is located approximately 400 teet west ot Orono Orchard Road on Fox Street and will extend westerly for 1,100 feet. The existing roadway section is 20*22 feet bituminous and narrow shoulders. The proposed fill area is to provide an 8 foot shoulder on both sides of the roadway. The estimated amount of fill required to complete this work is 700 cubic yards. Erosion control fence should be installed along the toe of the slope on both sides of the roadway. feb'^ u hr'.. The proposed fill area will protect the in place roadway. Water level near the edge of the roadway has and will continue to cause damage to the subgrade and bituminous surfacing. A wider shoulder area will protect the motoring traffic by increasing the reaction zone and keeping cars away from the edge of the wet land. ITi/iL. 4^J i - »• • • ' If I may be of any further assistance, please contact me at 636-4600. hfe-• V Yours very truly, fym »\vpfi^' I- » OO, ROSENE ANOCRLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Harlan M. Olson p--; •• .vw J ^ *s r'i HMO:pah:cnc pp'' ■ - ; ■iS* ‘V • V .* *■»* 139-GEN\l39.COR idu« ■ 'o«v ft « 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 p CKRTIFICATB OF MAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OP FENNBPIN CITY OP ORONO ) ss. I, Jamie Bosnia, of the Citv of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notioe of Public Hearina concerning the matter of #1720, was mailed to the attai'hed list of property owners . In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 3rd day of March, 1992. pi'JamigyBosina mf mm, mim:: *■ V* i PP' - • • ?V-^ Iff:aft-2m2m2mA '■ V- Ife’" I I Bonestroo Roscne AnderWc & Associates . *-.r <•< ifittm -4 , m^mm ^.. ‘ iff r »% s y # • Wkt*«. «•'*•' • V •- Jiflfc. •• N J \% r 0 _ 0.V ■-'A Si i Vy.4'.\i 'F fe'*' I;?' •>V 'U» mmmL SikI \‘.J'.--.L Cn^nt.Poqe Project: H-%.•^'’01. No./; '’" Coicutations For At-»-Pr^Mred 9y:<^i>4>Date 7<S" ^ 2. 4^U b«( Ar?^ Sneeer Reviewed By:Dote; II IIef'i -F 'I (t 1 ! f 1 I % IS 1 3 •Ui ,4 g# ■m: ■i pfft . m • I u:V'- ■ fi^»' i.' *» •■ - ife^4=mm Wi. ^r lill- ®||'' ^•; , ■ (<i-1 ■-• • 4f- ^*v«' h’ : ti*'' 1-V.ruTot UNCn. MEETINGChalrwin Kelley and Planning Commission Members •ft-iA Ron Hoorser City Administrator MAR 2 3 1992 it^et March 10, 1992 Sobjectt Repeal of Ordinance No. 96, 2nd Series, Interim Moratorium on Granting of Land Subdivisions within Shoreland Areas Council adopted the ordinance for new Shore land Regulations within the City at their February 24th meeting. Council directed that an ordxaaBee repealing the current interim ordinance be scheduled before the Planning Comiasion at their March 16, 1992 meeting for formal aetion and recomMndation to Council. it is Council's plan to act on the repeal of the interim ordinance at their March 23, 1992 meeting* The Planning Conmission may formally review and make a recommendation oa all subdivision applications but preliminary subdivision approval cannot be granted by the Council until they have acted on the repeal of the interim ordinance on March 23rd. The enclosed ordinance has beer, drafted for your review and recommendation . Additional CoiBaenta and Planning Comirassion Recommendation The Planning Commission unanimously voted approval of the proposed ordinance that would repeal the interim moratorium. The enclosed ordinance is now presented for Council’s review and formal action. h-,' i'"- -f ■ - ;-i ‘ i."life iffe. Tbs Chairman Kelley and Planninq Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator ’I';',,; te Date: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building fc Zonino Administrator March lOr 1992 Subject:Repeal of Ordinance No. 96, 2nd Series, Interim Moratorium on Granting of Land Subdivisions within Shoreland Areas fe:, -.r. ■-i.- Ss*■ "I- Goancll adopted the ordinance for new Shoreland Regulations within the City at their February 24th meeting. Council directed that an ordinance repealing the current interim ordinance be scheduled before the Planning Cosuslssion at their March 16, 1992 meeting for formal action and recommendation to Council. It is Council's plan to act on the repeal of the interim ordinance at their March 23, 1992 meeting. The Planning Conmission may formally review and make a recommendation on all aubdivision applications but preliminary subdivision approval cannot be granted by the Council until they have acted on the repeal of the Interim ordinance on March 23rd. fer" V" : - The enclosed ordinance has been drafted for your review and recommendation. i-fei; W:-- -fe': ' fellm -it? . 03m: It - ■ pf OKDIMASCB #SBCOH) snaKS if- JUI QBD1BMK3 or THB CITT OP OROHO, MIlfMSSOTA, ■BPSALIVG ORDinSCB #96, 2RD SKRIBS AOOPTIRG AR IRTBRIM NORATORiail OH THB GRAHTI1IG OP LABD SUBDIVISIOHS City Council of the City of Orono ordains: The Municipal Code of the City of Orono is amended by repealing Ordinance #96, Second Series, an ordinance establishing an interim linratorinn on the granting of land subdivisions that have not received praliainary approval from the City, adopted by the City Council on the 26th day of August, 1991, and to be effective through August 26, 1992. This Ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and publication in accordance with law. Paasad by the City Council this 23rd day of March, 1992 by a vote of ayes and _ _ _nays. mm.Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor 5 '■►fM ff ; \ Dorothy M. Hallin, City clerk Published* Week of March 30, 1992. -Mmi . r > K' I r ' i: ■a- -Vi' : 3' ■■ : i- :4>:X JA : I:v' ■HHMB AM MSnSorSiS^SS^ '“KSJSISSKSr' iI;w .• THE OTY OF OflONO OnDMNS: T>» »f aMng OMnirw* M». tt: 2n« al 1 1 1X1™wnt Xr Ml IM IMI «r ««• toMi X«n 5.-', n mm «■ MM» « ffW MOTf MM^ iMvftMtXlilMuXM'gaewB •liMi S I'SmwSJ** >»*» <gM « MmiMM IMMW MCTION 2. LX* Mi <Mw. ahXi 6* Ml «mmM Im « X theS5s?jS%jg LAcM TheMt xw* to X tNs (Mnann it NN*tX M »M fe’-' ■ Utm iMrmmar^ v^c asftooMeIfi9 0?y Oono 0< !tw* Cwft (S^ctlor^ 90 31 T'^sn Itr CfMii* (S^ctHy^s 32 33 TtiM IU3W S#cDont 4 5 T R0M ITurn mamiMm Ovdi* (S#cKK>4 ?? 34 MlTTW Cf##** (S«CWi*WdgMiirfii!> Mim# Cf#< 7.IITltM PnM) Lm IdM Cm* (Smont R29Mani (9mon«34»ruaN X 1CT117M R23wy f «mi idw Crmut {Smanen « r n tn ;CTIOM 4 rkMttfk TN« ordnance ftar • panotf of or^ foor It it no iS&%Sf£SSs g ^rnmm MM toa toM MMM4 SRE • and acnon. itkmmh ) X tw Zoning C om toxMMd^^tonOM .Tto CIX Councn OXnonoo d tw „ IrMtooXXtw to nM eanoonr • Xo Fton. X« It • oonrot to xo &«v tw n pramoM M MXX, Mtolir. and Mi«ar« •f tio otetf*t, tM tm o Mm 10 grtrt ■ MVMOd would eroM ■ tordXvo *» tn« SEcnoN gio!i!Mn°(X^ll _ ,_________ ___or ocMi Mm MounOir iMi b# haM in««X. d XiXt nx Xtoct any oinar CT10N y PWacmia D m mia ga « odMava upon adopoen oy Xo to Xa Cto Coiaicl X ma Cry X 2M dto Auguai rW' to • X4tooaand0naya> ArTEST Ooradry M Hallo. Ciy Oani “ ‘ A Paxraon. Mayoi STATE OF MP««SOTA) COUNTY OF HEMCPM) Tho i itodgad oraoXng matrumant oat I torara mo an Xo day Auguat. 1W1. to Bmnmm A. Potaraon and OoioXy M. HaOX. Mtoor« Cto Oam X Xa City X Orona a MtanaoMi mofWX aoporawn ™ aaid Xadutwant aiat atacuiad on banxf X Xa City tooaty PuMc (FUWanad X Tto Uaar and Ptonaar Sapi 2. 1M1) V • •■ ' * 'J k —T -a U »-=3 —' SEP 4 1991 Affidavit of Publication State of Minnesota County of Hennecin Bill Hoim oemg duty swiorn. on oath says that he is an authorised agent ana emotoyee of the publisher of the newspaper Known as THE LAKER, Mound Mm nesota and has full Knowledge of the facts which are stated oeiow A ) The newspaper has complied with aii the require ments constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A 02. 331 A.07. and other appiicapie laws, as amended r' Jum/n/B t The printed which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and w^ printed and published once each weeK for______L____________successive weeks It was first published Monday. .^V/aay 01 illd-lflillj \dl.the and was thereafter printed and published every Monday to and including Monday. the day of 19_; MEMHEPtN county lly ooiiMMon Subscribed and sworn to me on this yid day nf By;[/m Notary Public Rate Information (1) Lowpat claasilito raia paid Oy commprcial usara lor compara- Xp »oacp *10 40 ppr itk «. « ^ (2) Maidmum ralp atowpo Oy law (or aOov# maliar' StO 40 par men (3) flatP aclualty charged lor above mailer. S5 48 per inch Each additional successive week; $3.66 per inch ti’ ; ■tr i. r-*- ft 9St 2ml t. if tM ~ iM awiMWiwint if ■ iw *«•«•' O^. Thiriiiri. my mr4sSSiSSi i* OMM «l Uni L«i« <Ni Onn». ih«« M Sss££^Hs^•*TSSKSfTS--^ T«. •TOrMlMrii^ U ________ IVM oMNl Orrtnanoi « ll'tti fnUml wMn l» «•• » A -^m iV.v.i' j?, K: !/’: r*. r^-1^' fe; i-r«, isr- m? 'f 'H ._ - L0# Uknrm^or^ and assocaT*d r>av^ ijaeas&^saswy -MHMQOriAlAiSimMTWr ___tM Ory o^ Oono 30010at or tm iood oton oi 3^ r-0N *S0ii0a ior Ciooii* (Socaons 32 33 Tlt0N nasyv an0 Soctiont 4 s W3W)IMm UHw Cfooii* (Socso^s 27 34 T11M nm Hmrm Cr##^* iSmaior>% S mfmrm um PD^ ^ _-, JlOOO(SocBont 34 » TvSN R?3WmlSoiMna3.10T117N R23W) ___yowan laOi Oooii* (Socftona 6 7 Ti tn __ SCCTION 4 rh^nan Jh^ ahif 00 oCVocno «0r a panoO ol on« foof tta Ol|f Counai doMnma t^0t tt »f no raoumit ttutPot M adopiod and tnat and acoon. tnctucmg of 9ia Zoning Cooa Tha Ouraaon of 0y adoaaon of a tar a M MC^V)MnM.TTw CoiMal M MM • MRMi »IM Or*«rot f fMI 57&M« »* Uv OMM l«Mi 0< il! M it nm mrmmy » tm wihiHiW'i mn. fwt It « _______________________tf tm C<iytwi It vwtMM tw hMWi. mwir. and ««>»• of tm oiiina. on! ff«l • tliu^ to ftrt a WWW* would era aw a hardan^ *or tm 'AS«S& if i^t ard> If anr •i«l»i. iwwaao. or lart tnaraai or acaon •fcan ht«t<nda> aft^ ba haM t(w«<d. a atMtf no< aMact any otm> vicnoH'r fScaa DiB>—n«a Omnanco ta oNacavo upon adopaen oy f«o CiyOmtKt. ^Aloitad by tta Oty Oounci of iho City of OranaanM2OTtmrofAuoutt i9Bi ay a WMdfa^mandOnaya ATTEST Oorofty M Hallin. Oiy Coni narftara A Pataraon. Mayor STATE Of MtNNESOTA) COUMTY Of HENNEPIN) Tha ( dadi orofoini inairumont oaa i bafera mo on iTm day Auguat. im. by larbora A. Paiiraon and Oomfiy M. Haffln. Mayor * ON Oara of fia aiy of Orono. a Mkvtaaoai munfepaf oorioraaon andInabwnant OM oaaomd on bohafl of ma Cdy Notary PubOc (PubOanod in Tha Labor and Pionaar Sapt. 2. iMtl I t- 'u-t m u \mf ^ SEP 4 1991 Affidavit of Publication State o( Minnesota County of Hennepin Bill Hotm ^'emg ouiy sworn, on oath says that ne is an autnor.^eo agent ana emoioyee of the publisher of tne newsoaper Known as THE LAKER, Mound Mm nesota and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below A ) The newspaper has complied with alt the require ments constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A 02 331A 07, and other appiicapia laws, as amended 8 ) The printed 9 which IS attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and w^ printed and published once each week for______L_____________successive weeks It was first published Monday. dthe jAJz.'' day of Xhilk/pkA) ig?/. and was thereafter printed and published every Monday to and including Monday. the day of Rate information (1) Lowaai ciaasifiaO raia ca»<J by commarcxal useri for compara- bfa soaca: '10 40 par itkO (3) Maairman rata altowpo by law lor aoova maliar: $ 10 40 par men (3) flafa actually charged lor above matter $5 48 per inch Each addiiionai successiva week. 53.66 par men ^ 1> A. fa- oath says that he is yee of the publisher LAKER. Mound. Mm- )f the facts which are d with all the reouire- ons as a qualified Minnesota Statute applicable laws, as the columns of said published once each _successive weeks: >y. and published every onday. Auth(|rized Agent NNESOTA JNTY• 7«to>9r n this ^jj_i/. Notary Public tion tercial uMrt for compara- a matiar; S1 0.40 par wen. ittar: $S 48 per inch, reek; S3.66 per inch ■m w , m eean^M. — y.. •2 %: m- m W :# Pmm-W S’ i"ft ft: m•.-:.r * . IV :< t- WMm: Affidavit of PublicationState of Minnesota. County of He.nnepmBill Holm, being duly sworn, on oath says that he is an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the nevirspaper Known as THE LAKER, Mound. Mei- nesota. and has full Knowledge of the facts which a’e stated below A The newspacef has complied with all the require ments constituting Qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided bv Minnesota Statute 331A.02. 331A.07 ana other applicabie laws, as amended 8 I The printed.■la:u/ 'iir>yr WMi which is attached was cut from the coiuims of said newspaper, and was^nnted and published once each week for .successive weeks If was first published ^Monday, day of (Ithe and was thereafter printed and published every Monday, to and including^ ^^onday aH the i day of ./1 KMSTl HOLM NOTARV pmic - MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY My oomnUMlon wpim 7-MV97 AU!Wf%ed Agent Rate Information (1) UNMSt classified rats paid by commercial users tor oompar< (2) Maxiinum*rata akow^ bylaw for above matter: $10.76. (3) Rats 10000)1 chanjeci for above maiiar: $6.64 per hch. Each additional successive week: $4.02. : V-'wm '1^'To:Chaiman Kelley and Planning Commission M^COBNCiL MEETING Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator NAR Z 5 lu“t "fp -V ! Dat«< Sabjacts Jeanne A, Mabusth, Building i Zoning QRONO March 6, 1992 m #1723 Patricia C. and William Dickey, 2645 Watertown Rd Conditional Dse Pei-mitAariances - Public Hearing «o«4i^ Districts RR-IB, Rural residential Total area ■ 65.9 acres il'M- 1 j i'X. ■ |iK-, - . feS' tartinaat Ordinances ^ ^ , 1. Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C) (2) - Variance to total allowed area for accessory structures. Properties • 9+ acres Allowed * 6,000 s.f. Existing • 14,978 s.f. Proposed - 15,462 s.f. (additional 484 s.f. of structure for open~ended addition to existing garage ~ review Exhibit J) Variance • 9,462 s.f. 2.Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 - Height variance required for privacy fence in front/street yard. a' sM[ ,sk4* « Allowed •3' 6" Existing - 6* to 8' Variance - 4' 6" 3. Section 10.28, Subdivision 3 (A) a.Conditional use permit required for temporary greenhouse installed during sutnmer months of the year. b.Conditional use permit required for guest house/non rental residential unit iff* . , ■ f :>%v ■ ■ ’•'r fpfi ' ' ■ : Required as a result of legal combination of properties applied for on February 24, 1992. Zdst of Exhibits A-1-2 - Application B ~ Applicants Addendum C - Property Owners List D - Plat Map E *- Legal Combination P - Guenthner Addendum G - Brochure H - Site Plan - Crop Area/Temporary Greenhouse I '• Greenhouse Specs j - Survey of Property K - Site Plan - Location of Fence L - Letter to Applicant ■ r.''’i‘-m tei ^:\h:.\^ tr- ''.X' S' ■ p-‘ ls $0 .,}rk:;- '% ^■tMr kk' W: lif I; •V ^V.;. -m%. - ■ k Y' tik ;■ S'■•..-■ "r'S! kM(k : v.^»' it 'x-h"\-:-- •^;k:.: kkm--->A^:kV. \5Y'- ti#' :i.fe' j ;• file- '■' Zoning File # 1723 Harch 6, 1992 Page 2 Description of Request for Variances MSSm The first part of the variance application deals with a need for a variance to the allowed total area for accessory structures on this property that contains over 65 acres in area. Refer to the facts noted above. The 22* x 22' addition to the existing that serves the residence structure was constructed without the benefit of a permit review. As structure is open- ended and refered to as lean-to by applicant, Mr. Dickey assumed that a building permit was not necessary for this type of structure. If the property was not legally combined, a setback variance would have been required. Review Exhibit J. Note dtructure intersects west lot l.ne of Tract A, RLS 10^9. with the legal combination the setback variance is no longer required but a variance to the total allowed area for accessory structures is required. The increase in height referenced in Mrs. Dickey's letter occured during the time of the Golden View Drive construction and soon followed by the residential construction. The Dickey's have provided photos of the fence as it existed on the property in earlier years and will be presented for Planning Commission's review. Mrs. Dickey's addendum notes the history of the fencing, the need for the alteration for an increase in height and the hardships. For members who will ask the customary question, "Why is the City dealing with the issue of the fence height at this time?", staff would refer you to the earlier letters sent to the applicant. Exhibit L, and also that this matter was first noted bo the staff by at least two members of the Commission. If the variance for the addition to the detached garage is approved, staff would eck that you condition approval on applicants obtaining a penalty building permit for the unauthorised construction. At this time applicant may consider adding doors to the 3-sided st-iucture. Mon-Reatal/Guest Bouse Unit Applicant was asked to filer a conditional use permit for the second residential unit when the legal combination was applied for on February 24th. The structure is older and was probably part of the former farm homestead. The structure has been maintained by the Dickey's. It is staff's understanding that their daughter resides in the residence. Applicants understand completely that the structure can never be rented in its current status. If the applicants plan to either rent or sell this structure in the future, there is adequate area to support the 2- acre required area standard. Your approval of this conditional use permit must be conditioned on the structure never being off^ red for rent. (#1; -V ■V*' <-"V^*v■ ,*r--- .i *..r'...‘’‘^'i k' W: ■>:;r- •■'- r-.: m: .'I' ‘E-, J:;j^ ’i^ ': ?%■ ;* !• ' 4 ; ^Wit;,,- ■ ■ -n^S;;:*W-W*■■■■ ■ :.-H • ;-^ . ^■>;e'^- f ■■:■ -4 :* -'IW- ii'’- Bkm-i- wtt-' u .'t4/ $0-'' M'as y,n. ‘a-. 'S4 ■ Pi?;- t - _ Zonino File f 1723 Mazch 6, 1992 Page 3 TMiporary Greei • liTe •use review Exhibits F, G, H and I. Mr. Guenthner proposes bhe leasing of approximately 5 acres of land from th*? Dickey's for the raising of organic fresh vegetables to be sole 2 variety of outlets including individual households (estimated at 120), natural food co-op, and restaurants. Note the conditional use permit is required for only the temporary greenhouse structure. The crop use at 5 acres does not require a conditional use permit. The temporary greenhouse is proposed at 14* X 100' in area at a 10* maximum height and will be used from March 15 through oune 15. Applicant notes in his addendum that he seeks approval for a one year conditional use permit. Staff would suggest that a conditional use permit be granted for the temporary greenhouse without the need for applicant to reapply each year. Applicant need only apply for a conditional use permit if changes in the operation are proposed. A conditional use permit would approve the proposed level of use, size and location of greenhouse and should also specify that crops will not be sold on site. Options 1.Variances for height of fence and total area of accessory structures. If denied, please refer to the appropriate sectio.s of the code for the necessary finding. If approved, refer to applicants addendum for findings and hardships. Exhibit B, and additional comments of applicant. 2.Conditional use permits for non-rental residential unit and temporary greenhouse. If denied, please refer once again to the appropriate sections of the code for the necessary findings. If approved, applicant must be advised that second residential unit may never be rented and conditional use permit for temporary greenhouse is based on proposed level of use. Any change will necessitate the filing of a new conditional use permit. This conditional use permit will run indefinitely until the proposed use at current level is no longer in use. Isv r- -f -r - . . p I- =;■-> G>.^- r V’^ V: 'JP fer,p «■>1’; f. K>-': J#". ■■ ■ ^rli>P- -te, h? •p t-.. ■■ ^'-P'- . K::c 2onlng File #1723 March 19, 1992 Pare 4 Addi.t:i.onal CoHaentis and Planning Coaaiission Reconnaendation Additional Exhibit Exhibit M - Draft of PC Minutes 3 16/<»2 The four part comprehensive application would have been norma'ly scheduled for Council's consideration at their April 13th meeting but because of the imniediate need of applicant to instal 1 temp>>rary greenhouse for spring seedlings, staff has scheduled the application foi Council's review on March 23rd. A draft of the Minutes of that meeting has been included in your packet, Exhibit M. The Planning Commission unanimously approved the conditional use permits as proposed and the variance to the al lowed total area for accessory structures is on the 64 acre parr»:l. One Planning Commission member voted against the height variance finding r need or acceptable hardships to approve an 8* high fence. The Planning Commission recommended the following conditions with the approval of the comprehensive application as follows: a)Variance to total allowed area for accessory structures on 64 acre parcel subject to condition that any future subdivision of property resulting in reductions in total area will require variance approval along with subdivision application. Applicant is also furth'®’" advised that any additional accessory structure or additions tu existing structures proposed for the property will require new variance approvals of the City. Existing privacy fence at 6 to 8' in height within street/front yard can never be vertically or horizontally extended without appropriate approvals of the City. c) d) Existing guest house may never be rented. Temporary greenhouse is to be removed no later than July 15th of each year and may be stored on property in screened area. Any proposed change in size of structure resulting in increase of personnel will require additional conditional use permit approval. Staff has drafted two approval resolutions, the .irst approving the two variances md conditional use permit for the non-rental guest house and a separate conditional use permit resolution approving the temporary greenhouse use. V: » h MtSOLOTIOH 6HAHTIIIG .* CCWTIOHIO. OSB PBRMIT PBR NOHCriFAL 10HIB6 COOB SBCTIOa 10.2t, 8UBOIVISIOM 3A riLB #1723 WBBRBAS, Patricia C. Dickey (her*»inafter "the applicant") is th« owner of property located at 2645 Watertown Road located within tho City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as Tract A, RLS 1089 and Outlot A, Countryside Manor, Hennepin County, Minnesota, (hereinafter "property"), and WHBBBAS, the applicant has c.pplied to the City of Orono for m Conditional Use Permit to permit the temporary use of a greenhouse for a four month period each year per Municipal Zoning Code 10.28, Subdivision 3A. Minnesota: ■OH, TfflBBBFORB, BB IT RBSOLVBD by the ‘'i nci1 of Orono, FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1723. The property is located in the RR-lJ, Rural Residential Zoning District requiring 2 acres in acre. The subject property consists of 64 acres. 3.On March 16, 1992 the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the application and recommended approval of the application as proposed based on the following findings; a)Tlie structure shall be in use no more than three months out of the year. The temporary greenhouse structure shall be located on the 64 acre site so as not to impact the views of adjacent residendial owners. c) BIl..m When not in use the structure is taken down and the parts stored in a wooded or screened section of the property. Page 1 of 6 w if". . • 1-.r, . r ■^0‘‘mpp-flHt ' ' I*fy: s‘. y'-. g. ■V fc;-:r- x>:; •m»v-.m ■ '-f'.r .I't tr?v 4 mhi "V,l;‘ i-f' ;-4'V 7/n m-t’. /. ;r .-I ^v^■^ Bi>; I > ‘ V' ' ■' fev ■■i-r;, ,. ■t ft lift Ei'V.. ■ fe'' p. m^- ■' V . ( The temporary accessory structure shall meet all required setbacks of the RR~1B Zoninq District and for oversized accessory structures. 4.The City Council finds that grantinq a conditional use permit to allow the temporary installation of a qreenhouse on the property will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would net adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the pi^operty will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and che effect of the proposed use on the health, safety and welfare of the community. COHCLOSIONS, ORDRR AMD COMDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 3A to permit the temporary use of e 14x100* greenhouse at a maximum height of 10' on the property located at 2645 Watertown Road subject to the following conditions* 1.The temporary greenhouse shall be installed on the p^'^perty from March 15th through July 15th. When not in use, the structure shall be taken down and stored in a secluded wooded area of the property. 2.The temporary use of the property is approved based on the site plan included as page 6 of this resolution. Any intensification in use shall require submission of a new conditional use permit by applicant and owner. Page 2 of 6 t ■ s* '‘' - m. Wr‘ V,,, ^=^:, . '^s. . W- ..t/- *MteW SSiivii®'®'', .i* pi>;^;?^‘:-v' ■'■'"-■',/■ k-.-,. ' ■■ I'A:- 3. 4. 5. m 1992. JiTTEST t W ^r-- The applicant and owner, Patricia C. Dickey, shall be reaponaibla for all activities approved under the conditional use permit for the use of Common Harvest Coaaunity Farm. Direct sale of the produce grown on this pj^opetty has not been approved with this current conditional use peradLt. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a ■iadoaeanor. Tha undersigned owner has read, understood and hereby agrees tha terms of this resolution and on behalf of herself, her heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 23rd day of March, Dorothy M. Ha11in, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ipj"'ps: fesK"' V A 'V’ It: ■ ^ Property Owner(s) Dan Guenthner, Authorized Agent of Conmon Harvest Community Farm •• Page 3 of 6 WmMMSir-' Jttw i¥A¥B OP MIIINESOTA ) ) SB. [SPIN )COOMTy OP HI On this day of 199 Ft' ' - bnfors me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appaarsd knowB to M to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the sane as his (their) free act and deed. S9ATE OF MINNESOTA ) Notary Public )ss. .MJi Iff OP HENNEPIN ) “i/;’ 9';:; '■ ■ Oa this day of ______ __________199 bofore sie a llo^ry Pub lie within and for said county personally e^jpeared . ........................................................................................................— knottn to ne to be the person(s) described in and who executed the K:v foregoing instrunent, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the sane as his (their) free act and deed. ipir' ■Notary Public SS-'i r»^ii- SS?" Page 5 of 6 Ms ' ?f;S- A RBSOLOTIOH GRAVTIBG A COBDITIOHAL USB PBIMIT PER MmiCIPAL SOaiBG CODB SBCTIOM 10.28, SUBDIVISIW 3 (A) AND VARIAMCBS SKTIOH 10.03, SUBDIVISIOll 9 (C-2) AHD SOBDIVTSIOH 15 Plus #1723 6f I, PVBRBAS, Patricia C. Dickey (hereinafter "the applicant") is th« owner of the property located at 2645 Watertown Road ifiLthin the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally desribed as Tract A, RLS 1089 and Outlot A, Countryside Manor, Hennepin County, Minnesota, (hereinafter "property"), and jc/x. V M K'r' ■m W: ■ f ;• ,• *'• fe* NHBBBAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono to approve a conditional use permit for a house use o an existing residential structure per Section 10.28, and seeks approval of an existing privacy fence at a height of - where only a 3 1/2* high fence is allowed and ^ i nXlowed area for accessory structures for an addition of 484 s.r. to an existing garage resulting in a total area of accessory structures at 15,462 s.f. where only 6,000 s.f. would be allowed. Minnesota: BOW, THBRBFORB, BB IT RBSOLVBD by the City Council of Orono, FIMDIBGS 1, This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1723. If# 2. The property is located in the RR“1B Rural Residential District requiring 2 acres in area. The property consist of 64 acres. ■:h ‘ I .V. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this ap|^'^ cation on March 16, 1992 and recommended approval of t‘ roposed Conditional Use Permit per Section 10.28, Subdiyir^on 3 (A) allowing a guest house use for an existing residential structure and approved variances to Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (c) (2), for additional 484 s.f. of accessory structure, where an excess already exists at 15,462 s.f. and a height variance for an existing fence at 6’ to 8' where only a 3 1/2 fence is allowed based on the following findings and hardships: •y, ?Page 1 of 5 -VX -p: WfI. p-?: 1^R.;' f^: K:. M- N;vl ' - i';iv •• -#, H:'' /-!'-=. i- I. 1. -V .• -• M-'- ■a-, '■'Wlr ■ "E;.^S;,;r »!.; itr ‘^vSi\7 ,. .Jf Pi- #fe-mm- m&v1 l04 ■■ ill:i lilfci I/"-/r ' -■ '■/j-' I..:: .# •Ks !*■ 4. 5. 6. a. The existing residential structure had existed on a 62 acre parcel prior to the legal combination of the property with the adjacent residential lot. b. There is adequate area adjacent to proposed non- rental/guest house to allow subdivision at a future date. c. A privacy fence has existed in the street yard in excess of the allowed 3 1/2' height for over 40 years. d. In a recent residential subdivision on the north side of Watertown Road. A private road was approved where car lights would now shine into applicants existing residence on south side of Watertown Road. e. The total property consist of 64 acres City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the use of an existing residence for non-rental purposes will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property va ’ ues and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by the City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed use oi» the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 2 of 5 COaCLOSIOHS, ORDER AML COHDITIOHS mf- ■f'i- BTv' Based upon one or more of the above findinqs, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoninq Code Section 10.03^ Subdivision 9 (c) (2) and and Subdivision 15 and a Conditional Use Persiit for Section 10.28, Subdivision 3 (a) to allow an existinq fence and garage to remain on property as they exist today and to approve a guest house use subject to the following conditions: 1.The second residence rental purposes. on property may never be used for 2.Applicant shall apply for a penalty building permit for addition to garage. psA. ; ' ^ .V. 3.Applicant is futher advised that any plans to either vertically or horizontally extend existinq privacy fence in street yard, requires approval of the City. 4.Applicant is advised that if a future subdivision reduces the total area of 64 acres that additional variance review will be required for the excess of accessory structures and that the subdivision may result in applicant being asked to remove existing structures where there is no longer the area to support these structures. Any future plan to add to existing structures or install additional structures will require a new variance review. 5.Authorities granted by this resolution run with the proper*-y not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (March 23, 1993). 6.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, end shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 3 of 5 m. li' -k' ■-f>- •' psm ■■ 'wmJ- ^■: '5:' ' 'tv. '■W SKrViJ^. *v m- 7. pf#. ¥A- Th6 undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. 1992. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 23rd day of March, V-:M m ATTEST; II Si'Ssfc ■ iorothy M. Haiiin, City cierlc Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property 0imer(8) m OP MIMNESOTA 5 as • COUNTt OF H^EPIN ) 'The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 23rd day of March, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M, Hallin, Mayor t City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 ifi» ?>v-' wm , .. j I C»..l OP OROHO - GENERAL LANqJ^ C ^ ^ 1 PROPERTT LOCATION Jf Site Address ___________~zcA^ ‘S s i? u Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) CA ■ Hi ■ i b - •■ i oo _ Please attac i legal I on required survey. t option to application if *i- :e<^ APPLICANT Nara«\n^Cjg£--\ Phone (heme) Phone (work) ::>>oS ‘■^*'1 j • CCi'2 “2> Address ~ltAS rity ..Atce. Phone (home)_ _ Phone _ _ _ _ _ _ City _ _ _ _ np I'A-■. ^■(if different than applicant Name Address Zip Date Property Acquired (month/year) / I (do) (do not) also ownthe adjacent parcels of land. PEES CONDITIONAL DSE PERMITS - _________ $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use SI 75.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration cur omo v/ rvv’,.>*,'-r '■rrTrrt Aftrfitvk. w f XXm-U :^:020000C • rrv V i i>cn ' ‘•{7 »'V* 4 w'V' • V V ^ V'to V V V V.' ^ * ( * rv• V .1 c*u » ■JOllk 131.0200000 « w*V'a i rr.vV 4. fjCn • “"I. .*' ■ J w ,« V V'V'V'V'V iwM- 71 250.00 PRD/PID - see fee schedule a** V'aL/ f' Renewal Fee - $100.00 (no change from original applicati'-n) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Applicaticn Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 ' $175.00 $ 75.00 $300,00 $300.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation with Subdivision Rezonlng (PUD - refer to Tee schedule) Comprehensive Plan Pjnendment Appeals fees) Other - see fee schedule pm ■ If' m- W IMSKMT OSB OF PROPBRTT Present Zc ling District Present Use of Property Residential DBSCRIPTIOa OF REQUEST Describe request in detail; Other (specify! S»=t=- A^^lci^Ujr<v KBQOIBSD 8DBNITTRLS I, Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' 'you can obtai: tr.it list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-60 3 lovernmen Center 348~3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contour.s) if land alterations involve changes in elevatin (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 2. 3. 4. 5. «. 7, MMM UQOIKBD TO SUPPLY 30 COPIBS OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR COPT Cll* X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. Tha applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please raaMnbar that your application is not complete if the above information has not boon incltkled. Cartificatimi by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ APPLZCAMT'S 8I6MATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Date 2f\-Applicant's signature 0WIEII8 SIGNATURE The owner hereby ac)cnowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 day i before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review ..eetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building 6 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. lit.. ¥■ I ."V CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application' Variance for non conforming use $200.OC Aftor~the~Pact Fees (Double application fee #1723 PROPSRTT IVFCntHATIOH Site Address ~2.(A^ l.OAXgg^IXco **> ' Property Identif. Number (P.I.D. ) 0\- in coX_ Attach legal description to application if not included on required nurvey. Datg^Property Acquired ^ 1 l _ _ _ _ __^(mcnth/year ) I tf^^^(do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: y' residential _ _ _other(soecify) Zoning District_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ APPLICANT Name C Address: *2feAS VjO!w^Vrajoo~^^ Phone ( home ) ^ • 'S \ c> 6 Phone (work ) •-^'1^-C0 2-^ City: ^SX:U uAC-e Zip; w ite^ ill ■■RV".> ' Rrp: b.- i' ft (if different than apnlicant)Phone (home) Name ^ o- />v Phone (work) Address:City:_Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: O-" o> ed.1 J -IT^Vu l-TTa f - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - - - - - ■ ■ 4%' ■j: i Rr.ife- VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify)'T'^ l u m h. ¥ !V'^- BAROSHIP/DBSCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements:- - - - - criu __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ m P > •• .f.’. ‘',- k, 1^ ■i ■^r i'*.r- ./*,r' '«>' 'r $' (attach additional sheets if necessary' ftSQOJXED SUBMITTALS All of thm following Information aust be auJbmitted by the application <»* order for your aCT>lication to be considered complete; 1.___Ccanplet®<3 Application Form 2.Cartifled Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Gov- Center • 348-3271). 3» Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4.___Cartificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8S"xll" for 5. reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8*5"xll"). €. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8>5"xll"). 7» Ae an addendum to this application# please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please reflMMber that your variance application is not cosplete if the above laformahloti has not been included. V.'V , m'' \X'7' f ■y i APPUCMnr*8 8I6HAT01US The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this app.k ication# and certifies that the Information supplied is true and pcrr^t tc^'*h^ best of his/her )crowledge. Applicant '8 Signature Date OmOMS SIGNATDRB The owner hereby acJcowledges and agrees to this application and further authorises reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agerts. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and veriflcajtloxT'of this ^quest. Owner's Signatur Hr Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetJLnga of the Planning Comission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please ma)ce arrangement.s to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building s Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ?■■■■, .:WvV F" h ■' :'.r*,r ■ :.■ ' ■ i- ’■ j :-'- ■..'" ^ !‘V-‘ r rX-^^y' m u.; i,:f f .■'■V' , ‘■^V: yik^'y ■'■;->:■:■ ■% si's r fe.i i; v^:^''i; •' '••• 1: ■||W. V- •■T;/ 'H':) r' . it;' n •> v^'-y' 'v;.* 1t^ 4i^'^ 9.9 Patricia Dickey 2645 Watertown Road Long Lake, MN. 55356 4 Feb. 24, 1992 Orono City Council To whoD it reay concern, The property that I own at 264 5 Watertown Road has a privacy fence on a portion of it that is directly in front of our house and barn. This property was originally purchased by my family in 1957. There was and always has been a fence in the existing location as far back as the Heffelfinger ownership in the late eighteen hundreds along with the next owners the George Case family, the Hollasic family and us. Over the years we have maintained and repaired it on a regular basis to maintain it's integrity and appearance. We have always been a working farm here, and there are machines etc. that have a potential in^ct on anyone just wandering into our property. The fence has nXways been to not only maintain privacy but as a ~afeguard. In the summer of 1987 a housing development was placed directly across from our property. If I had been aware of the impact that would occur to my residence I most surely would nave attended the meetings and stated my objections. The prevailing wind pattern that comes into our home and property comes directly across the line that the homes were built on. As a result of these wind patterns during the contruction all the debries, dust and noise came directly into our home. The road was placed so that as the people turned out of it, the lights rack ncross our entire home and in all our front windows. The swimming pool, our yard, and windows were covered directly with dirt for the first year of construction. L'^'.-y'^-". \-- :;i^' ff«» 4,Xso discovered, to our dismay, that the smoke and chinunney smell cOBin^ fm ^he homes in a storm or any high winds, again came dLixect^ly In^o our home and still does. In an to effort to deflect the iiqpactf w* constructed a higher fence addition to the existing one that was hsro to divert the wind and debris much like the truck dsflectors you see on large semis. The fence did work. Ha wete contacted by the city of Orono and told our fence did not ooa^ly with city regulations. In an effort to be good neighbors we to<^ the addition we made to the existing fence down which in turn rstlimed the old fence to it's original form and size. We are now bsing told that we need a variance for the old fence which has again haen on this property in some form since the late eighteen hundreds. K:' I sincerely wish that we could have left the deflictor portion up as it did help with the nusiance we now have to live with. I felt that I did not want to cause any trouble for anyone. The fence is stained to laatch the bark of trees and fits directly into the landscape with the existing trees which have grown up around it for over 100 years. I respectively req’ t that the varience be granted. #1’"Yours truly, Patricia Dickey ■V- WV'rtM'- ifepf’ jt-z-9i. • ,^,'A. * ■ . •»■ • ■ “ It ■•<> V Ifilin« ’ .V ifM$:{! ^te2S'sB8-!S . n -;;•Hiii; 'V.. ■ ■-1 ■ -.y v;-». *- t -gr:- |:i* V'., ■ ifeil?,/ . ■ L§;:> ik' ^t'V : ;. tl rK u '* *T “ ■ ■ r':.. ■■ ■ :Pr “ ifty r ■ . ^''00 r ‘ ■' ■*, ■Sv^' r> : ' • ikv- m: r. I ¥ |T Hi 3 «4 Ml iiSSllriit M s |i sssn*5ss-s ^ 5 J 5J S ** K g •!• — r* < iM Mm ss SM S"*mg X s m i««Br $!!! '=i««f^,ss ilii; » 90 S VI f Ml VI Sc X ^ ^m P X ►- S JO fH m m f^a in Vii 90 in o ► O‘^si i§i«V < f» m X I'S r" IV U u O v«gfllr O VIss:i •"llgssi«5^~Si siV 3" ? * I*" 222^-85 «< n» X VI O o m in S» m » VI ? < S g VI I 9»w aS*S8:VI m »in! f- Ms -• c ^lli^^;s ss5ss;s g58*2 ^ ^ ^ OP n ^ 1- m m n n Q M ^ ^X r» o o » *iSCSn3X m X M M ^ 01 9 Z X VI ^ in o Wlvn #>n 01 H ► oo u -< m•^8 S^ii^S r-la 5 fV ffl M X 90 f m m in VI VI ?52 i X as m m 90 90 *0 t> » X IM M in Mm m iA 9 is01 s^ n ^ M VI 9 > H If ii So V 9 sSSSS*O o n o^ ssi- •m ffi III g ^ v« iisisi i« si “■ginm SP Ills Mi r* <M X l!siiI?? 2S8 f -f S ^M e Nn» -V N m S;;t^ I M i333IS ¥4 m o VI J! ‘•ft; M f3 IV stasm•^51"- -I !9o> S s 3«l fV •V 01 in ii AlZ-t S S 8 X ^ s X I/) O S ^ 0> 90 V **4» -I*SS *8 n VI ‘V 90 H -< IV ^ tn M '’pg s»-< C '•<*■ '■ t S3888S r-f J 4llmH m n VI Si 9vn 0» H n -V 9^8 S »S 90O ii M #> I JI■■^. •■ ,, • ■. » ■# ■ j->^- ' %. ..^ A-f' [fk •t^ ■li IS' S-M ;w’ a ,;^:y sss** |53 ifLmmmmmmrn^ | f« i :J' ' / r^- ••■•. ^V\ <».• IIB » • ;•■ <• '-^ • : V •.. Jlii^N -< _ )► §=ii Ci55“‘- -«o z Pts oo HP t>«1 i PP '"SImi g 3 cl ^ Mi Vi M S M" ^r“ o 1^ MiS'^s SI M »«*» 8 Mi 8 X -4 6 I #H t» ^ i«i >» r* 9 M#« m 3* .gM IMr- gsasss ft o ? r S M M O Ml S O 'iS ^ Cl o -»3 ^ r^i S S ISfW fSm I o 30 H O M fVI Ml < » H* *■”*8233iaQ p 2 fO !S3?'"M d Mi ♦>al5Cv 88»** Mi Oi Tl Og "25515 53555^ **s|;S 5 i i i S 8U13§ ispsii "a-gs Mi ill *'’8s J •^f p p l« P H H r- Mi Mi I M mCiS I » SiJ|P»3' I*i ? 8 8 -M A-f r>y Q. < V. ■ '’5«.5r- ’> K- a •. . - *« V>1-'V k* ■•■'■■.. .V. *' '' ?f., i' ’• *'m s., i' *' ' o ”• •» , . ■ • •. •■*,■/ ’*’•♦.■ . m ■■K'V ih- ■“■•• .V"V' ■• , ■%> • • >'ll|i\ -< 9 » S 9 9 Z > V ■< ^ 6Sf » « il|3 li 9 V -< ► ^ o *s ;a fr ^ SIS» -»RS"* K ^ S iSsa MssSi Ml t 3§ r* «>i» X X O Ml I— i r* f^ o n o ^ Ml • >1 » •» Ml Ml ^9 9 m o f- 9► o n M 9 a o ^ fM fl Mli^ 5Ml rw Ml Ml 9 a 3 ^s § •Ml a a Mi •- a Ml 55 “o o a M X o M» M o 9 O S a a ^ ?s:2*i Ml Mi t s 2R X a 8 ^ o •'SS «» Mi r-o-^S ii-sr-i :iS|pa 3 fMa fM ^ X fM \ N I 9M Mi r- 2S O 9 08 3 I, Iny^, .:,V?- : 'iSt ■ ?, -■ 'f'< ■ i rsSK; *~i« §i II JtC a 9 aa !l S'^28g *-* a u c. 9 ^2-5:«S*fi lil W — fB X ^ 2 9 0 *0i|-M z oo •< »^ m y* Vi ^.c^.^|gjjSg 9 r r^ o 88S'' ./'■ 4 („-;; . : v; SUrP;: ► i. - • »t ,v* ;y ,. . •» g m ffi Ml M *< •< M 8®O O o vn a S38SSS SSiSfS o J O 1^ o o S|!!"51183 {2822- 8 ^*- S qM<^ S 9*^'^ \r a «gs-Q ► Or ir a 3 fn m a ^s> M 9 Ml I ^41! m msmmcHBinara H II I ■ wg^l";ffig2S|l.i 0 H1^ jS'igg 1 asi n pg 1^ iiiffilBii pMSKH ^aaS^B^ • ■ __ J *(^'^'\ .-t •;‘'•»k:'-‘V D » t4 r- jf^r ♦ ' ,\ **' r K 4^, «r> > '<»r'* * i • ■ * • *t -N -^'V SV' * ■ " •V. -, t V* O ■ •if*i -* *■ f*-. < ;i i^ ''Vri,'*:; »*- i >'-i ‘ *^ JK ’•'' (ft r •»' V’'V‘V?'vV .*r' I . ♦ * * * I SiSp: j • /I » V’•IN ♦ Jiwtl 4 •'! ' • J lii '■ * w •» T . m r » r. i V ' ^ :rT7T * l- J f f I L-i •] •nr •nrr m*•M# TTlBi r*7sT»f mm eicsi SIRS»s*Kil fe.ife ‘‘PI?*'- &. 1-«■-,■■ COMMON HARVEST COMMUNITY FARM 2406 31H Avmn» South Miniwipolli, MN 55406 ws^l >:< February 18, 1992 1723 1 IV ■ v; / Orono Buldilng and Zoning Conm’ssion Orooo City Hall 1335 Soutii Brown Road Orono, Minnesota. Dear Coimission; PfI.wim< mil-: My name is Dan R. Guenthner and I am leasing a parcel of land from Orono resident Pat Dickey of 2645 Watertavn Road for the purpose of rais^ organic, fresh vegetables. I will have approximately five acres under cultivation in mivpd vegetables (see enclosed map for details on specific location.) t .V ■ pH' There will be no on-farm sMes. The produce will be sold to a variety of outlets. I will continue to sell approximately 80Z of the food through a European marketing style refered to as "Conminity Supported Agriculture". In such an arrangement individual households contract directly with me for a given volume of fresh produce for the grooving season. I have enclosed a brocliare tdiat further explains the concept. Most of our households are in Wayzata and Minneapolis, although this season we will start our first group here in the Long Lalce/Orono area. Tliere will be 120 households altogether. m. /V I also sell directly to Lakewind’s Natural foods co-op in Minnetonka and to several restaurants throughout the Twin Cities. 'Vf --tv 'Mr Central to vegetable production in our no them short-season climate is a Greenhouse. I have a 14’ by 100’ standard hoop cold frame greenhouse. This is a temporary structure us^ primarily for starting the seedlings. I have enclosed a complete discription of the struct.i-v and how it is used on the next page I would 3 ike to apply for a one year Conditional Use permit for this Green house structure. Please keep me infomed of the necessary steps iiivolved for this process. Thank You for your support for this unique farming venture. It is my belief that we all benefit directly by suppporting a healthy, diverse, local food system. R;So'-Sustainably, Km-.Dan R. (3uenthner Feel free to contact me directly at 729-8695 wil>» any questions. »:Wr Wmm': r'’ ►fei#.'pr mw" p' Ili: '<Si^ wr 4. li t'-. P ■ <V*'. M0 nKW*-ir is. ,V- p}?-: My-^mi:-mr f^-'' »■ fj*- ■ &' \ >ir'!A\ ,. V\ ■■ Ei^.V ' i u f ■i =4.- %•: "if- > oart 3 ■,i‘ '/* '•> r> ■..: ■':* itin 3*O ^ ST£ S c C s f IS 3 OQ 73 9 3s I n % S3 Sr II 8.1^1 j* t8’|i«-g«|j5 ii|j|»y} - g - o I ^l&ilai's?fHMl It 0131*'|i| i| Sis IIlfi|slf ®5|?||f| ** y«2'^ “ * *|as^3- * S . ^17*3n -’ S C “I |l 2. o ^ 03li 3*3 55 g “ c/> E c 3 -I^ £? * o o 3 S » ^ :r n I ^ K) ^;s I ■5 3 3=:3 8 i* g g B SI Ss |M u S3 a 3 -^ ?!:• &» 90 I'i I- o ^ So yS* 1 W S9 -s 3 V» ft, O- fiJ " — 3 Oo o f> a ^ n O R R 5 ^ ^ :/, 3lli^ ^ - 8 So - • “ ' 2, 23 C. m: S On || if iir sSo ISi. a slin 7 ;;: s ^ "II . '.VC. 5 ‘ Q*i- 3'i “i-9"2 3^30oo < g a " 2 . 3asi ■■ -V - ^ >S s I -3^2- S- =3a> y ?5 a- 2 i> S“ s;* 3 5“ 3 Pii >2. 3- i. o 3 S s’ n l?g‘3 3-'5'!33> > .^3 5! 3 5 = 5 3 5^” ” S 8 8 z llifils. £ ®» r = ^ 8.7 M 7 O *i “ ^ C.W » s. y 3 ^ o S C3. 3 ' 2 C. Q « a. — a M* W S n sr ft Q 3ns 11 c/s S3' fi ' rt a 5* — ft) o 3 I II ji:!'ss if’S'*■lillfit lIllEP^ 3 90 X -i|jg|l tt 3 09 3s* g.®! as sag ? S 5'^ 2, 7 ®- 5* g ^ — 9 fS |a?* ?f I 51- - S. rt 7 !<• « 3 S Hi = a ^ s s 3 5 5 I i -q|>T 3 ^ 7 X ^ 99 O Q 9 Qft, « 3 & 2 ■g a §■•*»■ a 155 s ffItsS Isili s If ^1., . £ S’ i: M 2IMli •a o C Cl- i' 01 s ^ f-2 ^ Ic^ s*Oq gs r2 ‘.:i{. •. « ■4 I i i II . I- ■■■r''-"%■433i23f|Q V'jJi-- '■■ 1.* 5»V. rf i •?.. V aei»rJ§ a ^ ~i zr ^ a, O ^ cj ^ Q. 3- 2 5 S i? = “ g"®® c. 3 0 J. _ 5. 3 C 3 ^ S 8 S - 5 ■■'Ifi! s ^ ? ? i =* ? 3 ‘<&~,£3C^3 8 i ^ cs- “■ i 3l?3&fi-Sa i. 2, g-ji fs-s af If ll||!l IIIIIf 3 I S- ? i 5 = 3 Sag ’S'f^ii 8^ 52c£jCE - — 5 ^ 2 2 I ? ^ ^ I ?Ilf^^^^3 i i s -" ^-tiSla «, rsicg f# ^ ^" I i E aS£ 2 c 55 sfllipfI ?11.« I °'S 3BB =lsi*'S ra g « «» a- o E f.siNi 8fifiI®>{T22l3 “212 a g^ 8 If ^I-i r®! if'5 I O O 5> a S ~ - ^ 2 5 S= - « «g a I S 2. - ^ a. E S 2 § SS 3 3|lf i I ?3 2^* Hnrt a a« -•a- ^ ^ o aj|jsi|ii rt :T‘rr c — C § 2 to 2 S w K ? « X 3 2 O a SJI -®^|sSSS8 Ssis- S'-3 s, 5 y. § g 11 sal's -, 'S ^ 3- S- ST g- « sislilp H___CIO fto ^ ^ &j 3 ^ Q S •??2 3o 3 . y-S?.*?® 8 58 a s 3- ? 5C 3 5 3r> < s a 2 I s S 2n ^ ^ 9^r mm mm-* &&§ s 0 3^1 D9 3 C. h S ® I i 1^ a 2 «= J ■i" ?l Mgs Ec oc/> S c C _ ^ “3 fi» a; « SC 09 s c g 3^ I S ^ ac § ” i i'S 5 ^ ^2«§§«=<5o -a o F’ aa;a w c’ ” « S ““ =w a. ^ f|3 I•§ 2 ooo ?r — = -. a? ?■ ^ « ' 2 ® 5 0<» ^ 5 5T 2 W c 11 Ilf if i?Si| 8 S 5 5i =•K * r =d * * '7 11'; ? iiLillis iii - ?&f I H r. c c. a «^1 S 3 3 3* »^ wl i s cs . ^ss: §■ 1 >£ 1 1 4 I ;l :■; ) ■i ■I : w cb cr > »—» fD ►— 2 ^ (S ^ Q "g^=? a-*3 »-n S O 5Vrt a. aj 03 <-{ H- 03 fD S3.8Ja _ . PI...V bvjfi:-'«jf"'’to., — — - ■ ^•^ ■ ' T| ^ » V Q O D o Q >-• £ •-< H- mmm^ ;-v t ^0m ^ t •m. -■X' ■i i. E o »-h 0)n otn u> o »-t) . r:. / V 8. - ■•« • •■ •■ w. «i. (S •* -7'xx i'v> •:* >. cr h-* CDCD I? ■K ■a' Mfg‘Mm-b O ^ , / ’^ . * jl ..1 Aid, •*i * ooD 7)ru Xo rr O O' h-* U1 oo zr D O 5| f5 S rt °o c 73fo in 03 C/3 ?-h H* "O 05 Cl) I—* CD Q- rc O 0) 3rt•n § 03rtc I ft r(m. T-W t >\ j 1'^ n '^r % '1 I ^ 7iJL>•. a !1 J i i * • i;iiill T:'<GREENHOUSE PLAtlS p.Dimensions: 14' wide by 100' long by 10' high. Structural design: ■ . .,»r sp«'.rHeat source: Standard 22' long iV arched steel tubing on 4’ centers. 52 stakes anchored 2k* in the ground with 3 per Ions (horizontal ties) for support. Exterior is a 6nm poly tacked to the wooden perIons on either side. Jte-, ■ r.'.i Electricity: ESm^ : A 125,000 BIU forced air furnace, fueled \^^Lth propane. A temp orary 500 gallon tank is delivered by a local propane company. All state and local codes are observed in placing the the tank the proper distance from the strticture and using the proper size copper tubing for the fuel hook up. Used for the fan on the forced air furnace. A standard 14/2 wire is run from the closest outlet. used: The greenhouse will be needed from tlarch 15, 1992 to June 15, 1992 r-i at wliich time it will be taken down. i*: T. ■ HI ■ V- WM ■;-i, v%'. tplp ■siiif- ‘ 1 . 4 i I '* i r' ■: ■v! iTvv:'r-.s ';iv'v ^-* «.. ■ MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 16, 1992 ;Sife(*fi:‘ "> . ■ “s'' l&MCvV "tep«; ■(#11) REPORT BY THE LAKE USE COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVE Chair Kelley reported that at the last meeting, the Committee discussed the regulation of marinas. The next meeting will be March 19, 1992 at 7:30 a.m. (#12) REPORT BY FACILITIES COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVES itfSiSifS' muv-i" V- Bellows reported that at a recent meeting with the architect and contractor grading was discussed and the Committee expressed their concerns about the overalI project. It was stated that the grading project was 75X complete. She felt that the issue of the construction schedule not being realistic must be addressed. She felt that the Issue of who on the Committee was allowed to vote was still unresolved. Jabbour noted that according to the architect, the only time lost to date on the project was In the preparation of the documents. He noted that the architect is continually stating that the plans are being redesigned per staff input and this must stop. w£$&'- isii".: The next meeting is scheduled for March 24, 1992 at 5:00 at the Orono Link. (#14) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Chair Kelley, seconded by Rowlette, to approve the minutes of the February 18, 1992 Planning Commission meeting. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#15) REPRESENTATIVE TO THE APRIL 13, 1992 COUNCIL MEETING Rowlette volunteered to attend the Apr!I 13, 1992 CouncII meeting. Ili® ■■ adjournment .V. > : • ■ -- Wd' Chair Kelley adjourned the regular Planning Commission meeting at 9:00 p.m. Charles Kelley, Chair Person itiR- 1 1 rnmm. A •y "jJ <’a:* ' ■"fV' •*':. .. ••V **' ■ •'' J^ ' f’ MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 16. 1992 ZONING FILE #1723 - CONT. iasjif- Mabusth stated that the building department orlglnaily had fire cSde probleL with the structure, but those have She noted that If there were no changes proposed to the structure, additional approval would not be needed In the future. S e ®. that the entire structure would be removed each season and stored In the wooded section on the property. Chair Kelley asked about the commercial aspect of the greenhouse. •^i- ,1' i-- f-hri . ‘■. ■■P'' C.^-V Ifelt, •Avi'V:- ■ -y' ; Mrs. Dickey explained that the man that farms the surrounding land and hIS family would be the persons running the greenhouse. It was moved by Chair Kelley, seconded by DfckH^Sfaoaroval of Application #1723 for Patricia and Wi11 I am Dickey of leas Watertown Road for a conditional use permit and variance approving the following: A) square footage overage for an oversized accessory Structure, as long as the property remains as one unit, or if additional Improvements are proposed, it would require additional City review; Si-rV • •WmW 'Md B) 4 6’ In excess of the allowed height for a privacy ^^art^:r^:^r*brn^^e;t^nro:°o7^■hr'f‘e^=':^^^:r;tt; or height wise; '4 property in the wooded area; and •I I 0) guest structure house non-rental use of the second principal on the property. SsiS^v'!^" Ayes A, nays 1. Rowlette voted nay. Mabusth asked If the square footage of structure should be added Into the square footage for the accessory structures. ■?; i-lwt ■' Chair Kelley felt as long as It was not should not be added Into that figure. a permanent structure. It ’0-'. ' ■: .‘«4V 00, .?• . v;4 -i 4 1 % •li 1 .1 e »- ■ ■ .^ >^V.rii^- 'A - I&-.' >f>^v • I^.Vv.. • &J',!-‘y ;r- , ■ ■ IH" iwr®■V.., re!^ V .’ iSag Ij5j|^?i*-i'-. K^-L, ■1% K’ KM, ’ % 1^' ,„ I'V. fe#^' W •^W' MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 16, 1992 ZONING FILE #1723 - CONT. Mabusth explained this application Is In fou* parts. She noted that the application Involves two parcels which have been legally combined, Outlet A of Countryside Manor plat and R.L.S. 1080. The property consists of 64 acres. She explained that the first phase deals with the three sided garage structure added to an existing garage on the R.L.S. portion of the property. The structure would need a variance to the oversized accessory structure ordinance. She explained that the code allows for a total of 6,000 s.f. for accessory structures on property 9 acres or over. Mabusth explained the second phase Involves a 6-8' high fence along Watertown Road where a 3 1/2' high fence would be allowed. She Indicated the fence was In place long ago, and has remained due to the impact on the property from the recent development of Golden View Drive. Mabusth went on to explain that the since the properties have been combined, the second principal residence on Outlet A would need conditional use approval to be used as a non-rental unit. She noted there Is adequate area on the property wished to divide off area for this structure In Stated the second conditional use permit is temporary greenhouse structure use two months special crop project. f the appI I cants the future. She required for a each year for a Chair Kelley asked if the oversized accessory structure square footage calculation Includes the temporary greenhouse structure. He stated he did not have a problem with the overage of accessory structure square footage as long as the acreage of the property remains the same, or if improvements are proposed, additional review by the City would be needed. All Members agreed. Chair Kelley asked how Members felt about the fence. He stated that It Is placed In the wooded area of the property, but noted that it had been added onto since the recent development across the street. x M-.1r. •Mabusth noted that It had been extended during construction of th4^f|r road, but those sections had been removed. ^ Rowlette stated she understood the problem with the road across the street, but noted she could not approve a fence of this height. Wy-: Chair Kelley stated that since the house was there first, then the road across the street developed, he felt that was adequate hardship for allowing the fence to remain. He asked if the entire greenhouse structure is removed at the end of the two month .season. •1 i 1 mm vmh:■->- ..@S^.^:■.' feSfc. i'-vs. f;j' -;•’ •V • V mm iS^'" W. V- • jmu; pr-W¥'-' sc^;vv,‘.-r, ■ ii^j'mm. « g?t«.£V;;?.n:^J_-...-. , Ifeli: m^rj> i.>-.....'. ., ms-mm?- t0’Wm ■ mmmm^ te'- » i ■ .*.•• a«i|iu. “lififi: mm'ml- isfep :.^- V.S--«• mimrn Wm‘ ' ilL ip«- -11^:" ■ ’■ V’*- '#«?;■■■ ' ®S:X K«£- - •^Ir-T: LX. .. . -C.'* .-..- . •; ’ MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 16, 1992 ZONING FILE #1722 - CONT. Chair Kelley noted tt >se safety conditions were originalIy pIaced because of concerns for those going to the school and traffic. He stated that he was adament about those conditions. He reca led that with the original approval, the contractor had agreed to clean and repair the roadway and asked what provisions had been made with this appI I cat I on. Mabusth stated that It was assumed that anyone doing the work would be responsible for repair of the shoulder. Chair Kelley suggested staff inspect the shoulder before and after the project to assess any damages caused by the trucks. He asked If It would be necessary to provide some type of signal to allow trucks to cross the highway. Mabusth suggested that the Engineer evaluate the situation and determine the necessity of safety precautions. Bellows asked If this effort would fulfill the original intent of the fIrst proposal. Mabusth noted that there are deep depressions on the property and this Is Just the first phase of the project. She noted the original application was for 200,000 cubic yards of fill. sne Indicated that the property would never be allowed to be constructed upon and the soil was not suitable for septic use. It was moved by Chair Kelley, seconded by Schroeder, to recommend approval of AppIIcatlon #1722 for Howard Boulevard, for a renewal of a conditional the allowed cubic yards of fill to 10,000 Eisinger, 3245 Wayzata use permit but amending Ayes 5, nays 0. (#9) #1723 PATRICIA & WILLIAM DICKEY, 2646 WATERTOWN ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING 8:24 - 8:45 P.M. The Affidavit of Pubiicatlon and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Mr. & Mrs. Dickey were present. 8 i •i (*1-: i ' ^^ a 4- te>-'r ■ - ;■■'p./> *J«i - • 'V M •: V- CITY of ORON Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, .Minnesota 55323• Municipal OfBcos OF ' ' ■ OHONCf On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka April 16, 1991 mm. Blil Dickey 3708^ Watertown Road ill I?"m ■. Maple Plain, HN 55359 Re: Greenhouse Permit Dear Mr* Dickey: recently discussed the need for a building permit for a ii^’greenhouse on your property ?SVsN'V Since your property is classified agricultural for tax Slifiand* Therefore setbacks from property lines, size limitations forth must be met. i '. , . Checking with Jeanne Mabusth and the Orono City Code, a CQnw®^ci« 1 greenhouse on your property would not be a permittee us« but a conditional use# requiring a conditional use permit m If the greenhouse is not put to commercial use, it would be ■ « ______________ M a* ^ a* «« «^ A 9 ct f 11^ n sh 4* OPdlfianCeSmi mu. classified as an accessory structure and subject to ordinances relating to accessory uses on residential property. Please mee with zoning staff to discuss this use as soon as possible or xeiiove the greenhouse structure by May 1, 1991* rip'*'-'7357. If you have any questions, contact Jeanne Mabusth at 473- p!;''tv Bruce Vang, Inspector W/tln Mr. ‘r ipy-■ lii/tUHNC a ZONING - <73-7357 ASSESSING Lyle Oman, Building Official administration a nNANCE - 473-735S FAX-473-O5J0 PUBI.IC WORKS - 473-7359 ■ !?’ .•3 i 1-4 - 'i i ..y- “i: .4,:: L 'i i v VV-- ; * X .1 ifeik ®'-- w«. y>, x^ QF QRaWdJ CITY of ORON Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, Miqn^ta 55323• Municapal OfH / On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka March 5, 1991 IWv ■? ■' 1?- Nf. 'Ms -^1 Wp Milllam Dickey 2645 Watertown Road Long Lakef 55356 Re: Fenc«% Construction Dear Mr. Dickey: mmM .-•'VS^A r' *XX'-' r'-’‘ r'i* ■•':«S*I On January 18, 1991 this office notified you of a problem with a fence that was constructed on your property. You were given the option of lowering the fence to 3J3' or less or applying for a variance. A deadline of February 25, 1991 was given. As of this date the fence has not been altered and a variance application has not been submitted. ■miMm!-.. m:w.c s''tm tei-- This letter is to notify you that if the fence is not lowered to meet the Municipal Zoning Code or if a variance application has not been received by March 25, 1991, citations will be issued and the matter will be referred to the City Attorney for further legal action. If you have any questions or if X can assist you in any way please feel free to contact me at my office. immmmm:. wmi L^e Oman, Building Official V ysMx' “ ?■ fe; ‘.'A": ‘ f LO/tln CCS Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning 6 Zoning Administrator Bruce Vang, Building Inspector ist''**?' •jffep- . .. *s>r • .,< .- -V- IMiP-' MM ' BiiiLOiNG a zoning - 473-7357 ASSESSING ADMIMSTR/KTION A FINANCE - 473-7358 FAX-473-0510 PUBMC WOnKS - 473-73S9 f£/-V... JS| . i ■I :> 4 V y>;-. ■ - '• -u- -r L mm^ ■ :^u'v^fev^'A:' i;'-'‘'*v^’ * %* ■' ^ M'cArm wy%M iK .^- vi!^:-^S Cijy ORONOd CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66*Cry.t*J Bay. Minne«U 55323*Municipal Officaa On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka ' 5Ty-% - F . ft.'Kvl|'' t'''-A: May 7, 1991 William Dickey 2645 Watertown Road Maple Plain, MN 55356 Re: Pence and Greenhouse Construction / Dear Mr. Dickey: • • • On 1/18/91 you where first notified of zoning of a fence that was constructed on your proper^ 2/25/91 and 3/25/91 for alteration, „^^ed by application submittal have "’^j^o^.e^ed to 8'. Again theinsoection staff, the fence has bee - fence fence in this location is allowed to be 3 1/2 jna^- ^ met a 50' setback from the front lot line iw couiu n« A/Mi/oi vou we-^e not'"ied of zoning violations and the rbu^°l"lii?rp'’e^llt-ap^Uca%“^on c- removal of the Structure has not been met. -V:. r..elv".i'by*s;‘o/9V, The" clt'/ill ar^th^ Matter to ^e City Attorney for further legal actions. thi. MnV;!eas"e to clfr^an^Vnl “J^he'ruildfnri Zoning Department at 473-7357. Sincerely,m ■i ’■i Lyle^man, Building Official cc: ^Jeanne A. Kabusth, Building & Zoning ..,3-0; Michael P- Gaffron, Asst. Planning 4 Zoning Acnt-nis.-a.o. _____ ^ ^ mm ^ f-A^ wa Am W •■* • • ^ — —--------» Bruce Vang, Field Inspector iIVlLDl.N'C a ZONIN’C - 47.'-7357 ;S, ASSfcSSiSC AD>tIM5TRATIO\ i nSANCE - FAX - 47.i-<'5l(> TL'BLJC ORK5 - 47.7.735'> "-‘t pi w v' 4' *■Wm^ u\Mr<•> % :^-- i£.ii; ‘m iSi-iiv- ^ tmr\^':r" iii:”'-' '■'IS teP-iiSr':p" Wli-W'i»' ife?;#' •:(rr^i-;.v.ik^*-'-» fePSPli- #;P‘-PP lifti"-' te? ' V5®:;, ,Msi? rWi- »>!/> m-rr' mri;f- te.. ;.pSy;: , Vy vV To: « From: Date: Subject fARon Moorse, City Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director March 20, 1992 Placement of Class 5 Gravel - Town Hall Road COUNCIL MEETIN MAR 2 3 1992 CITY OF ORONO 0 It is necessary to place additional Class 5 gravel on the frontage road to withstand the heavy loads of material that must be brought into the facility site during the time that the road is vulnerable to damage from that type of activity. We will place a heavier section on one side of the road to bring the loaded trucks in and then when load limits are off, contaminated material will be removed and the balance of the material will be placed on the remainder of the road prior to paving. The additional amount of gravel amounts to approximately 360 tons of which some of the gravel can be used in the parking lots on the facility site. The maximum amount of overrun will be $2,375. Attached is change order for that amount. Isv iAmi,J..sLs^ ..M.,... . -7. ri %i . m .r.V1 ■ feSf^rfvai^' ■•"■ ■ ‘ rjt ■■•■* » I Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk & Associates Engineers & Architects Otto G. 0or>«tfoa PC Robert W Roscoe. PC Joseph C Andef*IR. PC Bradford A Lemberg, PC Richard E Ttirner. PC James C. Olson, PC. Glenn ff. Cook, PC Thomas C. Noyes. PE Robert G. SchunichL PE Marvin L Sorvaia. PE. Keith A. Gordon. PE Richard W Foste' PE Donald C Burgas. PE Jerry A Bourdon. PE. Mark A Hanson. PC. Ted K Field. PC. Michael T. Raotmann. PE Robert R. PfeWerie. PE David O Loskoca. PE Thomas W. F^rson. P£. Michael C. lyrKh. PE James R Maland. PE Kenneth P Anderson. PE Keith A Bachmann, PE Mark R Rolh. PE Robert C Ruvsek. A i A Thomas E Angus. PE Howard A Sanford. PE Charles A. C/iduon Leo M PaiMeisiiy Harlan M. Oiion Susan M. Ebertm Mark A Seip r March 18, 1992 m. - p?»> Mr* John Gerhardson, Public Works Director dlty of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay# Minnesota 55323 Ret THI2 Frontage Road Sewer# Water and Street Improvements Our File 13951 Dear John: stfc-M&- ipi' Enclosed please find change order #2 for the above referenced proje ‘ This change order provides for additional class 5 aggregate base t ■ provide access to the City facility site prior to placement of tn^ bituminous surfacing. We recommend the City Council approve this change order. •f* Sisi an®-mm- iiii’p'- Sincerely# Harlan Olson HO/ch |®itf a'.. ■ax.till 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 i •i 'm f .1 -1 i \ j S--^^*•■ *■** X.City of Orooo^ U3S Brown Road, Crystal Bay, MN 5S232 DiMe March 18, 1992B & D Underground, Inc^ 1351 Co. Rd. 83, Maple Plain, MN S5359 Changr. Order Nou 2W«w<< Co. Mischke-Borrell & Assoc, Attn. Duane Mischke, 1000 Shelard Pkwy #250, Mpls., MN ^ - - v!'. . CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 Trunk Highway 12 Frontage Road Sewer, Water, & Street Improvements Project No, 91-2 File No. 13951 p. , ■ -------- • '■•■ 14 .This wder provides for additional Class 5 to provide an access road to the facility site prior to placement of bituminous l^iMMing. .. . — UnU Coniracl QuuiUty UnU Price Total Aiuoant Order Na 2 Wt .. mim- ."is Hi" mm . Qatt 5 100% crushed quarry fimeatone aggregate base Total Change Order No. 2 Ton 250 9.50 2375.00 $2375.00 irm m-||H%lul Contract Amount 'if-/'- ■' 4 TniiiOttS Change Orders ' ^ Cha^ 2 - ADD 188,786X10 1635030 237530 iteiw Amount (i 207,71130 W' :-v — A f . i*-# -riiL *W'A aM TVr. ^ 5:- .Sisja . .,,,. . ■ - . -. .. * ’ *-C* - ■1 *.i.. r*.V- r*v~/ V -"v^; 7 '. rS »y 2 r •V 'fJSfj f Ha.. *. . 1.1 . 'X ■<'' S» ■ m-te’C' .'!i‘|i.'§:. teiv i'"^- 0- wp-ftfc' 'u- it- ~i--‘-'*.'.'.: ;■ i> ^ li' -V '^r > - ■ -; - ■ ',' ‘„‘Ti :,i'ri-'fe.:-; ■1^:- ;-i .• •' :i^-. V ii'*^;'K. -S'i5^.:-'' - Nvi"’ 1?^ 'S\; f' Si'-”"' .•A -To Dates Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator March 20, 1992 COUNCIL MEETING MAR 2 3 1992 CITY OF ORONO Subjects Community Development Block Grant - Funding Allocations Attachments s A* Memo from Larry Blackstad, Hennepin County's CDBG Coordinator concerning Orono's CDBG program funding history B.Letter from Interfaith Outreach and Community Partners requesting funding for a project The Council continued the CDBG hearing from the March 10th meeting to enable staff to research the issue of the 15% cap on public service funding and to contact the lOCP regarding a funding request. The 15% cap on funding for public services is a requirement of the CDBG program. This cap is applied to the total of $2,7 million in CDBG funds received by the County. Because the amount allocated by Orono toward public services is a very small percentage of the total cap, Orono does have some flexibility in exceeding the 15% cap. However, both the City and the public service agencies should be careful about creating an ongoing reliance on a funding source that, although it has been stable for quite a few years, is not guaranteed into the future. This is why many of the projects funded by CDBG are one time projects. The lOCP has requested a grant of $2,000 to match a grant from the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency to hire a project manager for a low income home buyership program. Several possible allocations of the $25,700 CDBG funding amount are as follows: Aqencv/Proiect WECAN Westonka Intervention lOCP Bousing Rehabilitation Park Planning A $ 1,000 1,000 1,000 20,000 2,700 $25,700 B $ 1,000 1,000 2,000 20,000 1,700 $25,700 C 1,'900 1,900 1,900 20,000 $25,700 The Housing Rehabilitation Grant cap is $10,000 per home. Most requests are very close to the cap. Larry Blackstad has recommended that allocations for Housing Rehabilitation be made in increments of $10,000, otherwise odd amounts will not be sufficient to fund a project and will be held until the next funding allocation is made. If the Council determines that the Housing Rehabilitation amount should be $10,000 vs. $20,000, there would be an additional $10,000 available to allocate to other projects. Projects approved in the past have included neighborhood park improvements and community planning. Isv '^■4*A*. Wm&' pict wm'ffii ,viiXv/: _ ■‘ ■ »%Vr-PW:.|Si>rm^:- *--------'■f._m.h.-Si.t'tpm,mm.'kmfo'-'-''-- ^\U' ■ ‘h te»'" Mmrmm^y. r?Wf-’-' Ipg; ■ 0^?*. >j\ ■■'■.'.-h.m0-i" '****■ ** *"' FSfew.' w ■■• M-. ■ 'V. ;ilS',^;, V.= -■;^vv‘- ■I . HENNEPIN DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: March 16, 1992 Ron Hoorse - City of Orono / Larry Blackstad. Senior Planner '^/«' Office of Planning and Development Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program The city of Orono has been an active participant in the Urban Hennepiii County program since 1976, the second funding cycle the program. Since 1976 the city of Orono has been allocated $616,398 with another $25,736 programmed for the city from the FY 92 grant. The major program activities undertaken with the available funds have included; Housing Rehabilitation Sewer and Water $330,892 185,161 47 households assisted Assessment grants within the Crystal Bay area. Assisted Housing 30,000 Assisted in acquiring the site for the elderly housing development in Mound. Neighborhood Park Improvements 10,520 Bederwood, Hackberry, and Antione Parks. Community Planning 43,919 Comprehensive community planning, sewer plan, community trail plan. Public Services 8,100 Funds provided to lOCP, Westonka Community Action Network, and Westonka Intervention. In addition the city has funded smaller activities for the removal of diseased trees and removal of architectural barriers at polling sites. Should additional information be needed or there be any questions, please contact me at 348-5859. LB:dc i.^-v I '/''• i kT.^,P- fe- ■ ^ |fe- ,.»■ ift-li*: ?ilr ' i{&>; r.:f" ' v' r'i£ f- > >,» . ' • •V’J-V T March 18, 1992 John Gerhardson Department of Public Works City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 INTERFAITH OUTREACH & COMMUNITY PARTNERS “People Uniting to Help People" Dear John Interfaith Outreach and Community Partners is negotiating with Methodist Hospital toward the goal of preserving and relocating three of the Arleigh Street homes being displaced by the expansion of Methodist's Wayzata facility. me proposed re-use of these homes is for homebuyership for low- income families of our community. We have secured a grant from the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency to hire a project developer/manager for this project contingent upon our ability co find matching funds. The findings of the preliminary feasibility study for this project are very promising. A matching grant of $2,000 from the City of Orono would provide a very timely boost toward the goal of getting a project developer/raanager on board. We would very much appreciate your kind consideration of this request. Thanks so much for your past encouragements. SI'm> Sincerely, LaDonna Hoy, Executive Director INTERPAITH OUTREACH & COMMUNITY PARTNERS LH/jc ■ ' ■ no Grand Avenue South. Wa>/.ata. Minnesota 55391-1K72 47.3-2436 . . .' "is,,./3 * V <;.' !hM'.Vv'- • iP® ili;-'. Tot Froas Datfe: Subject: Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator March 20, 1992 Bederwood Baseball Field Schedule COUNCIL MFETING MAR 2 3 1992 CITY OF ORONO a* ' The attached memo outlines the proposed schedule for the usage of Bederwood Baseball Field for the 1992 season. It is recommended the schedule be approved. Isv ’.?r‘ •'iPS'"-' - fc,.: -m:.my k:!|; Mr sift.- V vit' ^ r I*' fc. tmy " WC'm. p-ffs . il'P: W’S&iSi ■ WSlif.- Sh ■X': ■VoLS/wik at'V 4 |fef#,v- V pi*'- p'' t? »/ ORONO LITTLE LEAGU^^ P.O Box 503 Long Lake, MN 55356 V-- 4.;I' I • V ;r ^rw y^., f} I,> . V TO; City of Orono March Z, 1992 P'C if'" 1K.L:' ATTN: John Cerhardson. and Orono Parks Commission MM' m H-'‘- rL‘' - 1%m-' HE: Pederwood Baseball Field Gentlemen: Wi The Orono Baseball Association hereby requests usage of Bederwood Baseball Field for the 1992 season as follows: 1 ;• ip>- fe: rtv cN ‘ ■ DURATION OF SEASON: A. Se«son Bealna: May Z. iq«2 - Opening Day tor Major teaoues. pi-f' B. Season Ends: Apprcm. July 11. 1»92 - End of Play-offs. (After July 11. there would be occassional use by tno All'Star team tor practice.) 2. Uih.mm ^'V Sj.. ■ "■•w'"- vV y ? m," S^V' ■' FREQUENCY OF GAMES: A. May 2 to May 16 - One game per evening. -4*3o B. May 18 to June zb • Two games per evening. C. Juno 27 to July 11 - Play-offs. 3. DAYS OF WEEK: A. Monday thru Thursday: Games at 4:.10 and 6;.)0 p.m. B. Friday; No Games C. Saturday: Regularly schedules gamo hI 10:00 a.m. /■ Mdk<2 up Qfimes at. Noon It nccf^ssary. the INTtSn* OF* THE ABOVE SCHEDULE IS TO USE THE FIELD THE SAME AS 1991 ’ • t. \*L, "• V-1-. i0'' The teams that will use the field are: 1. Five Maior League Teams (60 Players). 2. Six Junior Major League Teams (90 Players). 3. Six Minor League Teams (90 Players). ^4-.. |sy£, -'■■i Also, wo ore discussing with Mound Little League the possibility ot one round of- interleague play. , n-, • , Semng Vic Yovth Of Oic Orono School Dima BASEBALL ASSN. > iSv-';.J lilft'”W>* *T;- if.- iri-’v • • FBONs DA9BS SUBJ: Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jack Brinkhaus, Street Foreman March 3, 1992 Spring Clean-up Days - May 2 & May 9, 1992 COUNCIL MEETING MAR 2 3 1992 cmroFORONo W'The City of Orono Public Works Department is planning spring clean-up days on Saturdays# May 2nd and May 9th# 1992 from 8:00 a.m* to 4:30 P-m. The collection point will be behind the long# gold equipment shed at Brown Road South and Spates Avenue in Crystal Bay# next to the Administration Building. The following items will HOT be accepted: ;.:;V n W-M- -■;# J''Ml „ .-.t H newspaper or corregated cardboard garbage trees brush chemicals truck loads barrels# drums# chemical containers# petroleum products or containers leaves and grass clippings ,year HO leaves or grass can be accepted during our City clean-up because of space limitations. We will be collecting leaves and grass clippings all the other Saturdays of May and June Mfii ■ ■'.'f ^. k , ' Appliances will be set aside and will be picked up by an agency that disassembles and recycles appliances. There is a fee to have them picked up# but we are not recommending charging a fee to the residents at this time. Wo will also accept tires. A private company will be here to accept them for a fee. The residents will be required to pay about $2.50 per car tire. II# OROHO RBSIDEHTS OHLTl PROPOSED MOTION; Moved by seconded by ivVA'’"’- _, to designate May 2nd G May 9th, 1992, as Orono Spring Clean-Up Days. Ayes_ _# nays- - -. To< nV:r kzr'.'' Mayor Peterson & Orono Council Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Forwarded recommending approval. :prv‘ ^ ■< ■■.4ii»«COUNCIL MEETING MAR 2 3 1992CITY OF ORONO XARDWRSTB PROGRAM 1992 The City of Orono will be providing a drop site for leaves grass for 1992. The drop off site is 1335 Brown Road Southf the^long gold equipment shed in Crystal Bay next to the administration office, on the following Saturdays from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.: and The schedule is as follows: Saturday April 25, 1992 8:00 a.m. “* 4:00 p.m. '■f ^ . -r . .iii"'Because of severe space limitations NO grass or leaves can be accepted on May 2nd or 9th during our City Clean-up. wfe , Saturday Saturday Saturday Saturday Saturday Saturday Saturday my- 'm- ■,/>r i. a Si-'" Saturday Saturday Saturday Saturday Saturday Saturday Saturday Saturday Saturday Saturday Saturday May 16,1992 8:00 BL.TClm —4:00 p.m* May 23,1992 8:00 ck m m •—4:00 p«m« May 30,1992 8:00 ^ • m •—4:00 p • m • June 6,1992 8:00 SL • in •—4:00 p.m* June 13,'1992 8:00 3 • m«—4:00 p.m* June 20,1992 8:00 sl m m •—4:00 p • m • June 27,1992 8:00 ^ • itt •«•4:00 p • m • : Site closed no collection Sec+'euber 5,1992 8:00 a • in •-4:00 p • m • a September 12,1 ■‘2 8:00 a • in •—4:00 a am am p • m • September 19,1992 8:00 a • nt •—4:00 a am a% p. nt • September 26,1992 8:00 a • in •4:00 M a% a% p • m • October 3,1992 8:00 a • m •—4:00 p • ni • October 10,1992 8:00 a • m •—4:00 p •nt« October 17,1992 8:00 a • m •—4:00 p.m a October 24,1992 8:00 a • m*—4:00 p.nta October 31,1992 8:00 a • m •—4:00 p.m. November 7,1992 8:00 a • xn«—4:00 p • m. November 14,1992 8:00 a • m«—4:00 p. m. Bagged leaves will have to be emptied into a large container at the dropsite. We will not accept bags of any kind. ,>■ Leaves and grass only. If other materials are mixed ^ith g]pass and leaves the entire bag, bags or load will be rejected. HO BRUSH vC’-?'-m' yk : .1 ' - COBNdfi^EiTiNGTo: Front Date: Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council I Ron Moorse, City Administrator >. March 20, 1992 mar 2 1992 CITY OF^"’T»^0 Subject: Stubbs Bay Sewer Project - Assessment Hearing and Work Session At the March 3rd Work Session concerning the Stubbs Bay sewer project, the Council determined that the Assessment Hearing should be delayed to provide additional time for staff to collect and analyze additional information to assist the Council in its decisi -making concerning the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project. In prepare on for the Assessment Hearing, staff and Council should meet in a Work Session to review the information st?ff haj nut together. The Work Session should be held at least tnree weeks prior to the Assessment Hearing. It is recommended the Work Session be scheduled ^or the week of March 30th and the Assessmeiit Hearing be scheduled for the week of May 4th. Isv 4^ %i ft To; From: Date: Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator March 20, 1992 Subject: Equipment Purchase - Public Works COUNCIL MEEnNG MAR 2 3 199? CITY OF ORONO The attached memo summarizes the bids received for replacement of the utility tractor for the Public Works Department. It is recommended that the low bid of $23,896 from Scharber and Sons be accepted. It is further recommended that the purchase of the tractor be delayed until we determine whether Orono may be affected by the State budget problems. The proposed cuts in local government aid do not affect Orono because Orono does not receive any LGA. It is possible that the legislature may look to reduce other revenue sources as it tries to find a solution that spreads the budget balancing burden across al.1. cities. Isv It I mi ' V ■ L " '■ ' m' •'7T - f . • J'- ■■ b- Ron Moorse, City Administrator PROK:John R. Gerhardson DATE:March 18, 1992 SUBJECT: Equipment Purchase - Public Worka For the 1992 Budget, Public Works allocated an amount for replacement of the utility tractor with side mount flail mower. On Wednesday, March 18, 1992, we r--.''eived and opened the tractor and mowers. sealed bids for The following is the bid tabulation: Did #1Long Lake Ford Tractor Ford Model 4630 Edwards Mower Model 7472 Demo Less Trade-in Less Special Paint Deduct $7,600.00 1,200.00 Total Bid #2Long Lake Ford Tractor Ford Model 4630 Edwards Mower Model 747? HD Special Less Trade-in Less Special Paint Deduct $■/ ,600.00 900.00 TOTBiL Long Lake Ford Tractor Ford Model 4630 Tiger TSF75 Mower Did #3 Less Trade-in Less Special Paint Deduct $7,600.00 1,100.00 TOTAL $26,677.00 7,300.00 $33,977.00 $ 8,800.00 $25,177.00 $26,677.00 8,600.00 $35,277.d0 $ 8,500.00 $26,777.00 $26,677.00 8,200.00 $34,877.00 $ 8,700.00 $26,177.00 Memo March 19, 1992 Page 2 Scharber and Sons John Deere Model 2355 Tiger 75" $24,446.00 7,500.00 $31,946.00 Less Trado-in Less Early Pay Discount Less Special Paint Deduct $6,850.00 200.00 1,000.00 $ 8,050.00 TOTAL $23,896.00 I recommend to purchase the tractor and mower from Scharber and Sons for an amount not to exceed $23,896.00. ;?-■ if- ■ •> 1 r-iM- ' b' -f \* IPf ^ SR* ■. IK- i;- W' C:i'' wliMA' • f- IP «-** t;; V f?' mm'-' 4, cr*.: ; 'i';^V ■r-' m |f' W:1! y. ^C'.-I?> i: i- 8-' - ■ £vi I:"' ^v ?'■ f/ 0^-f'\ ^•:rl :• t: iW\- * *■: ’ . / *4 To:Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council From:Ron MoorsCf City Administrator COUNCIL MEETING mar 2 3 199? Date:March 20, 1992 CITY OF ORONO Subject: Title Insurance Coverage Increase As part of the closing on the purchase of the property for the City facilitiesr the City purchased title insurance as protection against any problems with the title to the property. The amount of coverage was based on the value of the property with the intent that as the improvements were constructed on the property the coverage would be increased to match the increased value of the property and improvements. The City Attorney has suggested that because we are now beginning construction, the coverage should be increased at this time. The Attorney further recommends that rather than increasing the coverage in increments as the buildings are constructed, it is preferable to simply increase the coverage at this time to reflect the full final value of the land and the completed buildings. Using a final construction cost of $3,500,000, the additional premium would be approximately $5,250. Council action requested: Motion approving an increase in the title insurance coverage on the new facilities' property to reflect the total construction cost of the City facilities. Isv .if'' '/r •'i D To:Mayor Peterson and Crono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator March 20, 1992 Subject: City Newsletter Options and Costs Date: COUNCIL MEETING Mar ?' i99f CITY OF ORONO As directed by Council, staff has prepared a number of informational articles for a City newsletter. The cost of printing the newsletter varies depending on whether the newsletter 's typeset by a printer or done in-house on a word processor. ^he costs of the two alternatives are as follows; In-house Printer Postage Typesetting Printing $ 600 $ 600 -200 500 700 $1,100 $1,500 The typesetting alternative will give the newsletter a substantially higher quality appearance. Also, the flexibility in typesizes could reduce the number of pages needed resulting in lower costs. It is recommended the typesetting alternative be selected. Council Action Requested: Motion approving plans for the City newsletter including outside typesetting. Isv ■I t :.v M!v^:^Ex? i' l-w-:- 4. M ■ ■•>%./ •V r t---i' m '*^ -• . • ) To: Proa: Date: Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator March 19, 1992 COUNCIL m riNG mar 2 5 199? CITYOFORC 0 Subject: City Hall and Public Works Buildings Application and Certificate of Payment No. 1 Attachment:Application and Certificate of Payment No. 1 Steininger Construction Co. $60,750.00 Kraus-Anderson Construction Co. $22,443.00 We have received from John Davies, Project Construction Manager, approved application for payment for site clearing by Steininger Construction Co. in the amount of $60,750.00; and for payment of partial Construction Manager fee by Kraus-Anderson in the amount of $22,443.00. The attachments are presented for your approval. Proposed Motion: Moved by seconded by to approve City Hall and Public Works Buildings Applications and Certificates of Payment No. 1 for site clearing to Steininger Constrv'ction Co. in the amount of $60,750.00; and for partial Construction Manager fee to Kraus-Anderson in the amount of $22,443.00. Motion: _____ Ayes, _____ Nays. Isv M ^ : ■' v^' '" v Sv ■ ^ t- v. ?•mm: K V •' * m ^■®.: ; I KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY COMRACrOKS & CONSTRLCTION WWAGERS ijit'A..: • March 17.1992 h-': ■V: --■ ■:*S'V Mr. Tom Kuehn Finance Director City of Orono 1335 Brown Road South Crystal Bay, MN 55323 S?*" ;-V> i#:- m-r Re; Orono City Hall and Public Works Buildings Orono, MN K/A Project #4059 ^■0-r Dear Mr. Kuehn: Attached are the Applications and Certificates for Payment for the above referenced prcycct. Please make payments directly to the vendors listed for tlic iunount shown. fcvv *v : Application and Certificate of Payment No. 1 Period From: February 1, 1992 Period To: February 29, 1992 Secdon Subcontractor/Supplier Payment 02200 Steininger 60,750.00 CM Fee Kraus-Anderson $ 22,44i00 Total:$83,193.00 j % Very truly yours, .US-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMP.-\NY i:vvvv" '■;r-.*• in Davies Project Manager JD/lm £nc. ■-K t Minneapolis Division Sir> South 8lh Sir*‘(>t \Vnneapol''> 53-404 Phone: <fal2i IG> 7281 FAX UO.’- U2-07JO Equal Opportunity tn>plo\er W' “ v , ■» s ••« -. K,. i'". ■P#. W,; .,y 4 ■ 'r' / V4^ h' ■> '*- p#' ■-■ J^v ■' i'-’ M .' . » K V ■ i« •- ;r. -; -t •«» •> »* • I - \) f - •; ■V'i •V -1 *» 4 ' t' • • ■ .' *1 r ‘ :-;.‘:‘V- ' •'• '..i' . ■-' . * •* r-V:• «\|» ^ i.». .»• t*. frr. j *• !■* - % V. * .* - * •" • < • * • • I ; i.' . ■ »• •. ,■.»• * • .' » r I . 4 \ 4 I • •• •* N* * • . •• W' I KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CONTRACT()RS \ CONSTRUCTION MANAGERN Invoice #P28323 * ■ -ff t> « •STEININ6ERCONSTRUCTION CO.. INC. 3070 Lexington Avenue South ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55121 V___ No 1446 - ^ ditf;« Phone 454-1980 Kraus-Anderson Construction Company 525 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55404 DATE 2-21-92 JOB NO.4059 JOB NAME^^°^° City Hall and Public Works Garage JOB LocATioNOrono, MN TCRMS CONTRACT DESCRIPTION EXTRAS TOTAL CONTRACT AND EXTRAS PREVIOUS BILLINGS k, 't-'m- t Jl r ■ r P V:.,> ! •• ii:. ^■ ' 3 / ■ '-ita . 'Af>: . n. ‘ n:iv • WORK COMPLETED TO DATE 2" -r. 14 0k.« . »••• "C ■ 4 --l::RECEVED ^Bl TOTAL WORK COMPLETED THIS BILLING LESS: PAYMENTS BALANCE DUE: ^ 500.00 Less 10% Retainage 1992 ir-»P - *«» •«««»*• I Ivriiii-A-..'- .--'n ^ ^ORl^SVNAt^tiai CocDfKJny PRICE AMOUNT 7 254,000 iOO 254,000 iOO None 67,500 00 67,500 00 None $60,750 00 "SV: '• -11 COUWCiL i, 'iG Ron Moorse, City Administrator MAH ? < 199; Cir/OFORONO PROM:John R. Gerhardsonr Public Works Director DATE:March 17, 1992 SUBJECT: Request for Speed Study East Long Lake F^oad Recently the City received a letter of co ncern from an 0 ■ resident regarding the speed limit on East Long Lake Road. A review by staff has determined that a safe and reasonable speed limit has not been established for East Long Lake Road. Due to the fact that East Long Lake Road is narrow with sharp curves and the fact that a public swimming beach (Summit Park Swimming Beach) enters/exits onto the road and which also generates pedestrian traffic, a speed study should be conducted. I have prepared a resoluti<^n for Council's review and approval. I >.EkJ*mt ^ ‘ ' I" >fivj;.'. I RESOLUTION # :V _ _ _ _ _ _ ••^■« il?-U^'Svr A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONDUCT A SPEED STUDY ON EAST LONG LAKE ROAD 'v.' •: a*:.; i?",' WHEREAS/ the City of Orono is a municipal corporation existing under the laws of Minnesota/ and I" (■ 0i'%.WHEREAS/ the City of Orono has received comments and complaints regarding the speed limit on East Long Lake Road. NOW, THEREFORE/ BE IT RESOLVED that the Orono City Council does hereby request the Minnesota Department of Transportation to conduct a speed study on East Long Lake Road to determine the safe and reasonable speed limit. Adopted by the City Cour i of the City of Orono/ Minnesota at a regular meeting held_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor fe-k ... Attest: ‘If;'Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk V- v: ■ l}i‘ ■ 111' i ■i| * ;V '• A • ifp. f: I?'- V;?>'V |?ir v"*^' • Si* .' fe^iV' % ^?:- W: ■ t ■■.i''w ■ ■ a^r ’ it W>4- t&-?'A'' .Anr.^vv,tet %m'-. lpft fM '' • • V*- •i. i'.,■ ^ ■KJ'' ? '-' ' -', '■ ' ' ■ "- ife l|. fV-, i" is^A .BF:. iSv:' ^'1,:' ■ sJ.v m\ I"'Hr fee:-- TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Ron Moorse, City Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director March 16, 1992 Bathroom Improvements Orono Golf Course ^ 3 di.-> Was 2 ? jggj CITY OF ORONO For 1992 an amount was budgeted for bathroom improvements at the Orono Golf Course. We have received bids for those impro’^ements but due to recent Americans With Disabilities Requirements, the costs exceed the amount budgeted. However, it is my recommendation to proceed with the improvements for an amount of $7,483.73. The amount budgeted was $6,500.00. Vm. B.! ••'.■■ ■■ i* t i- r r Silrm '.;7; -'A ♦- f’ 1 yv r.I'* ' - ■ >%« »'-'i- f •Si. ■*_ fSsf "r- . ’Uv ■■t-M i ♦ 3* ' 1 cy isCOUNCIL MEETINGlist os licsssss for council approval mar 2 3 1992 POR MEETING OF March 23, 1992 CITY OF OftONO 4 Septic System installer Site Evaluator/Designer •• •'>••••« . jt.. .i wA ■ 1a. Ue^-.. Hayes & Sons Excavating Rt 1, Box 202 Montrose •I Jerry Johnson Excavating 2445^Morningside Rd Long Lake 11 McCarty Water & Waste 6250 Hwy 12 W Maple Plain Patnode Brothers 16551 Lake Ridge Dr Maple Grove Sullivan Utility Services 3660 Hwy 101 Wi-yzata Thompson Plumbing Corp 15001 Minnetonka Industrial Rd Minnetonka Volkenant, Inc 1030 County Road 83 Maple Plain Widmer , Inc Box 219 4250 Creekview Circle St. Bonifacius Koch’s Soil Testing Box 81 Loretto S-P Testing, Inc 951 Katydid Lane NE St. Michael 1n ■■■ :.j k: CITY of OKON - (612) 473-7357 SEPTIC. SYSTEM INSTALLERS LICENSE APPLICATION %i Post Office Box 66 |f" Crystal Bay, MN 55323 oo'> i- CA"'S: p All questions must be answered. License f‘certificate of insurance, and evidence of MPCA Certification must be -Beached. All applications are subject to a ten (10) day approval period. 1 “ ‘M 1. 2. 3. 4. Business or trade name Sons Jr y.Ca.Oo.Pi Business sddress j/YlonPr/nS €, Business phone ^'7 ^ “ 3 b A ! Residence phone ____________ -O-r tz5. Name of applic^t or company representative holding MPCAName of applic^t or company represent certification HcL^-^S ^ ^I J4 Type of certification held: X Installer Certificate expiration date /9-/ Pumper tl ‘IS “TTV i-.r nor^ifi . - . C-s M c'l W»'UMUHave you ever held a Septic System Installer 11cense Orono before? yd 5 Most recent year _ _ _ _ 131150^^ 0 ir I* .t: 7s Have you evei. had a license revoked? Where? __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ A/O When? r» i rcki V .1 U*i-i t -1^ rw) U I (C u #) i r I u r,'i M YOUw%. 3:- 9. Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yes Do you pump out septic tanks? Yes _ _ _ No I ii I * f I ? t^t t i I i ^ Arrfc, c V «' V' u V A n V A i w * UiJ ---- -7 V*j/vO No SUBMITTALS REQUIRED: [/' 1. $50.00 License application fee. ^ $2000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Orono asP^ C4--«4-a W7 1 1 not* be ^CCeOtGCJ • 2. ■Jf- obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accepted.^^ 3. $50-100-300,000 minimum Certificate of Insuranc^e.Sj^ T7 4. Coov of current MPCA Certificate. ^ ^ l?r3hJf ZY3 • ) UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTEDLICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSE List persons other than applicant who are authorized by apply for permits under your license ■ The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of Orono, Minnesota, for a license uo install and repair septic systems, and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinances of the City of Orono. fv p ft Date 3 " ^ '2^Applicant's Signature C^ CITY USE ONLY Staff recommendation Approval Reason for denial; _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ City Council Action Date _ _ _ _ Date license mailed _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Denial Date Approved Denied 'W.- ft.■,p v/« •CITY of ORONO (612) 473-7357 Post office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERS LICENSE APPLICATION All (questions must be answered. License fee, bond, certificate of Insurance, and evidence of MPCA Certification must be attached. All applications are subject to a ten (10) day approval period. : I Business or trade name ^ ^/f 2. 3.Business phone ^ ^^ Residence phone vJ-* 4. 5. / Type of certification held: Certificate expiration date Installer Pumoe o • %■ \ i ■, 7. 1.. Have you ever held a Septic System In^^l Orono before? J Most recent year /* * f When? ler license in Have you ever had a license revoked? Where? __________________________r T f L 1 li Ut U’l^U'lTU 'rl 9. Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yes Do you pump out septic tanks? Yes _ _ _ __ No No cV A/AAi“C ricir T t VI I i. Uri- UZi 7 A 9JX X i./ V'W W fM rrv ’^’^.00LJ rum' u > li-vn Tl I 1-A. te,* • vv vna SUBMITTALS REQUIRED: f\C,LCir i 11 I ;i225340 COOl RCi 715:41 02/1S/9..ni ir^l, $50.00 License application fee. 2. $2000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Orono as obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accepted HT-.. obligee* The State Piumhers hona wixx noi: oe yT\2, $50-100-300,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance. 4 . Copy of current MPCA Certificate. LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED List persons other than applicant who ■ for permits under your license .ithorized by you to apply Ef-, The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of Orono, Minnesota, for a iicf.nse to install and repair septic systems, and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the^aws of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinances of the City oSrOrono. Date ^ Applicant's Signature^' W"y :ty E ILY Staff recommendation Approval Reason for denial: Denial Date City Council Action Date Date license mailed Approved Denied V*/ . ' , ,1, Y.,,, iPV--ii ..Atiillfifco. {■r- et w u 1^fe" -■f • ■.-ir-%- t . ■-: m- ff. r^- .i#'Ss#' P.,s-' # % 'v; % f,-' ^.v s K- i; I #• w rt • i-: CITY of ORONO (612) 473-7357 Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERS r LICENSE APPLICATION L / All questions must be answeo-'ed. License fee, bond , certificate of ins'uAnce, and evidence of MPCA Certification maet lattaChed. All applications are subject to a ten (10) day approvaT period. 1. 2. 4. Business or trade name IVI (^Cdt-iy lOg^rH iOas'^ UiA/u lD' Pla/?kPla^n /TIjO Business phone Residence phone V*77~ ---- Name of applicant or company representative holding MPCA • Wy (YIC^^ __________certification hi 5.Type of certification held: Certificate expiration date Installer umoer 6. 7. Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? Most recent year /ff/ _ Have you ever had a license revoked? t\.Q___ When?__________ Where?________________________________________________________ 8. 9 Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yes Do you pump out septic tanks? Yes X_ No X No ilTi OF ORQf^O FIi\A^U OFFICE SUBMITTALS REQUIRED; / . - 1. $50.00 License application fee. 1^2. $2000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Oron^ obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accepted _■ i i tj V i.-v v V A ^ rc\i VJ. V?U1« CA W'V • w ruci'x Ti C.A /V*/v* vv l5i-fot3oS?OoS “ini;;irrer?iircatrcf^^^ "7*4. Copy of current MPCA Certificate. LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED List persons other than applicant who are authorized by you to apply for permits under your license _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ __ The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of Orono, Minnesota, for a license to install and repair septic and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinances of the City of Orono Date rJ'CITY i USE ONLY Staff recommendation Approval Reason for denial: _ _ ___ _ _ _ Applicant's Signature a'^Ej-\ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _/- Denial Date ^ City Council Action Date Date license mailed _ _ Approved Denied I SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERS LICENSE application J # CITY of ORONO (612) 473-7357 Post Office BOX 66 Crystal Bayr MN 55323 All questions must be ^ttache^^^lf ffi=atlonrlrrs^"b"jlc\\^o “a"«n"aot day approval period. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Business phone -3 79Residence phone Name of applicant^r certification any representative holding MPCA Q _________ ' —------------------------------- »pyp0 of CBirtiif 1 cation h©ldj Certificate expiration date •^^j^Installer / T-/ ^ / 9^^ Pumper year Have you ever had a license revoked? "’’a"' Where? Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yes No 9. Do you pump out septic tanks? Yes SUBMITTALS REQUIRED: No rTTv r.r “fvtiv.n FUSANCE CFFICt 1311500000 01 OEti •c: . ^ k/ • V nC fISiS 00 Uce^fairpe^it b"ond naming City of ^ ib?io;e Thflta^e Plumbers Bond will not be accepte|^,/Jfci ^QljlX3 IsO-folllOO,000 minimum certificate of In^rance.g^Sif^^ O.A copy of current MPCA Certificate. e,p. licehshs will not be processed ontil all items are submitted ii. ar^r>licant who are authorized by yo4 to applyList persons other than applicaj^ wno _ _ for permits under your license ,7^.- - - -'7^'^ -- - - - - The undersigned hereby applicet^o"^ t^th^ Minnesota, for a to ^ the^laws of the State of and/or pump out septic tanks, orono. Minnesota and the Ordinances of the ot ^n°- Date -l// -i-/ 9 -Z- Applicant's stanature :iTY 35E DNLY Reason for denial: ---------- City Council Action Date Date license mailed _ _ _ Date ^ Approved • ' i ■ • SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERS LICENSE APPLICATION CITY of ORONO (612) 473-7357 Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bayr MN 55323 All questions must be answer^d. License fee, bond, certificate of insuAnce, and evidence of MPCA Certification must be attached. All applications are subject to a ten (10) day approval pericj^g ^ ^ j >r . s 'S»;- . .■i ' Rt-- 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8 • 9. Business or trade name Jt Business address ^ ^^ ^ Business phone Residence phone ^/7n Name of applicant or company representative holding MPCA certification jgSSi. ^ ^ Installer PumperType of certification held: _ Certificate expiration date __ Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? Most recent year 5*/ jJS{{ave you ever had a license revoked? Where? _________________________________—--------------- Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yes Do you pump out septic tanks? Yes — When? No r-TTv* r*r rorfkif)ui / r in ununu I iitr^Muc. > iu-u, iltr?MU4- 13I1500000 0l iES rucrv 1 50, OC 50. OC SUBMITTALS REQUIRED 4 uECEIPT-T^n^K YOU ii2356S0 cool ROi Ti2‘, 0Z^24/ $50.00 License application fee. nr-r^nr $2000 00 license and permit bond naming City o obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accepted^ $50-100-300,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance. _ _ ‘ copy of current MPCA Certificate.^ LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED List persons other than applicant who for permits under your license ^ The undersigned hereby makes application to the City MiLesota, for a license to install Stlt^of and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the la Minnesota and the Ordinances of the Ciyy^ of Orono, Date ^ ^ Applicant’s Signature CITY USE ONLY Staff recommendation Approval Reason for denial: City Council Action Date Date license mailed _ _ _ Approved Denied i--. X CITY of ORONO (612) 473-7357 f. Post Office Box 66 J Crystal Bay, MN 55323 SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERS LICENSE APPLICATION All questions must be answered. License fee, bond, inauAnce, and evidence of MPCA Certification must be ^tach d. All applications are subject to a ten (10) day approvalpgar:2><C. 1.— 'f;; 1. Business or trade name ___ ri Tn C PrAjD^v' I t rvHi ^ T ^ “ vj ' * 2. 3. 4. Business address PA i -v \\m I ^ l< <>- .L Business phone _ Residence phone ----------------- I f::' Name of applicant or company representative holding MPCA certification r~>o p or\-g p“lit a ---------------—--------—------- 5. 'K^ipfe«- Type of certification held: Certificate expiration date y Installer Pumper \q^ VvW ti?:7 . , r Have you ever held a Septic System ^staller license i Orono before? Most recent year /J_J---- Have you ever had a license revoked? I\]Q----- When? -------------- Where? 8.Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yes Do you pump out septic tanks? Yes - -- V No No V {“ T V r'tiT !ah t ^ S I I t-'f Flr^AtiCE OFFICE 1111500000 At I CXj\/a c?ui« i UL! K u I U-Up 71 -c: Ar<W •iC <. w' • V V RECEIPTrCU -'^-^0 cool ROl TIO:SOBMITTALS REQUIRED: ^21^ '/>1. f$50T00> License application 7^2, SwmfToO license and permit ^^2**4 . Copy of current MPCA Certificate LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL I TEMS ARE SUBMITTED List persons other than applicant who are au^orized by you to apply for permits under your license y < <-c/ a?A? '-'Aizd- S5nnAotnnrthroALancfs^f “Vhe''c Date Applicant's Signature / ;iTY rsE >NLY Staff recommendation Approv Reason for denial: _ _ _ _ _ _ City Council Action Date _ Date license mailed _ _ _ _ _ _ Denial Date Aooroved*• Denied , • • ^ •CITY of ORONO i (612) 473-7357 Pos-t Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 SEPTIC ^STEM INSTAIILERS LICENSE APPLICATION it K J »* rf ¥ ti •» All questions must be answered. License fSS^ - ------ - • iofiESiu^%e»-a‘ttached. All i insurance, and evidence of MPCA Certificat applications are subject to a ten (10) day approval period. 7T? ^ i-:" 1. 2. 3. 4. Volkenant IncBusiness or trade name Business address 1030 Co Rd 83 Maple Plain Mn 55359 Business phone 479~1547 Residence phone _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Name of applicant or company representative holding MPCA certification Bob Vo^lkenant_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ 1 . Type of certification held: Certificate expiration date X Installer 571 X__ Pumper r-6.Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? yes Most recent year 1991 W 7.Have you ever had a license revoked? Where? _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ When? U 8, 9. Do you do Municipal Sewer hcok-ups? Yes Do you pump out septic tanks? Yes ^ X Nc r “ rv nc WpVOW.. I I No “ 1 khskirL nccTPC f T? f^ X wfV'VV'V^V/ SUBMITTALS REQUIRED Uj. i-'iitrucrv Ti U*l I i» ' a VV 4 ^w*a W / 1. $50.00 License application fee RECEIPT-fHAHK YOiJ ^235i^90 cool POi >L 2. $2000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Orono as , i_Q3 obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accented.'' 3. $50-100-300,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance. fxp. X 4. Copy of current MPCA Certificate. n ' /■•?,< /0-"lt.t/ / - if.';- ‘ - ?■■■ LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED List persons other than applicant who are authorized by you to apply I for permits under your license __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _r^k - --- - - - - - --- i Date The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of Orono, Minnesota, for a license to install and repair septic systems, and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinances of the Cit^^of Orono. 2-17-92 Applicant's Signature XX CITY BSE "^NLY Staff recommendation Approval Reason for denial: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Denial Date City Council Action Date Date license mailed ______ Approved Denied 3 Pr Ir i i I I: I ’- |v kr J-l:. .fj.: !^- • u-v M- t '•'' ■ ■ ■t' I 'pr p *'5- 'r*^ r.;- - ?f ■'•»., K'::VV (<••■. :■ ■ft.' i I S' i‘ i.- Jr. i'-' fi: t r- %.... CITY of ORONO SEPTIC SYST^ INSTAU.ERS (612) 473-7357 Post Office Box 66 Crystal Biy, MN 55323 LICENSE application (tift-ficste ofAll questions must be answers .. ^ an insr arre, and evidence of MP^.- '.e.--•; :ati n ^tl^ScTied. All applications are subject to a : .ii ( i ,ay ' proval period.-** 1. 2. 3. 4. Business or trade name V idmer •_ Business address P-O- Box Z:9, 4250 ■ .eek-vie.^ Circle, Sf,. Bonifacli^ MN 55375 Business phone 1612) 446-1485 Residence phone —(612) .16b-o8 6^ Name of applicant or company representative holding MPCA certification ______________Anthony A. Vender Unde------------------------------ 5.Type of certification held: Certificate expiration date X Installer Pumper 12-31-94 o.Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? Yes Most recent year —L??l . 7.Have you ever had a license revoked? No Where? __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ —- - - - - - When? 8. 9. Do you do Municipal Sewer hook—ups? Yes Do vou pump out septic tanks? Yes _ _ _ X No »*" 7 T”V I U J. / / V-'MUIIU X cr'fjM^irc ncpjrc » JLfVmTUU \jt • AL/i- f 7? fi ,.»X .1 vw Vi Ti-v’v u / fi.w n L.____ A. fc.' » CCrC TOT^TUA'Aik VTf/MuLuii t f nntii\ » u'l->CL£ii # fnntit\ lu'i- ^"•y^TOn rAni OAj Tjuvvi nvi li V'X./ X SDB*UTTALS REQUIRED: i/^l. $50.00 License application fee. i/ 2. $2000.00 license and permit bond naming City of ^ ■ obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be ' $50-100-300,000 minimum Certificate of Instance .c»p» y-f'7^ Copy of current MPCA Certificate. LICBHSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SOBMITTED ziZ 4. List persons oth-ar than applicant who are authorized by you to apply for permits under your license SEE ATTACHED - - - - --- - - - - - - - Date The undersigned hereby mrkes appl.icat on to the City Minnesota, for a license to install and repair septiv- syste , and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws of the S..at- of Minnesota and the Ordinances of the Citv of Orono. ( \/ '■ / (y- ^Applicant's Signature _________LC-\ ■' ---------------------------- . L ' 2-17-92 CITY USE ONLY Staff recommaniation Approval Reason for denial: __ _ _ _ _ _ _ City Council Acrion Date _ _ Date license mailed _ _ _ _ _ _ _ u Denial Cite 2'^<3-9JL Approved Denied LI' .r. -i "■;»■ • ^ !•* iV Car,, 1^-. r ,^>- k V.; fe'fi tijf, ^V) ■ v>..w fk yi"'- ijf.'o. M-' '■ ' m¥- CITY of ORONO (612) 473-7357 Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 SITE BVAI^DATOR/DESIGNER LICENSE APPLICATION All questions must be answered. License fee and evidence of MPCA Certification must be attached. All applications are subject to a ten (10) day approval period. 1. 2. 3. 4. Business or trade name •.iPv Business phone Residence phone_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Neune of applicant or company representative(s) holding MPCA certification *^Vs>/fra«^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 5. Type of certification held: ^____ Site evaluator designer. Certificate expiration ______i - 3 ^ ~ AC_ System 6.Have you ever performed site evaluation or design work in Orono before? % Most recent year 7.Have you ever had a license revoked? VXAD Where? When? i > / i/l U»\W1 SUBMITTALS REQUIRED: r_^jL. $100.00 License application fee. \/ 2. Copy of current MPCA Certificate. £rt^ i~ 1 i: \ AlriLt. u'/" I*” j-L E f 7.11500000 vi C-Ull iv'VkV'i CHEL-u.- l-Z‘ Tti ' u Ai/U Ai\uuim.4.i I f I tm^n f uu r.ViJ Titw' Lr\/\/A fill ^•i7/f • 1/i.V s ~ 55/r. LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED Date The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of Orono, Minnesota, for a license to perform site evaluation and septic system design subject to the laws of the State ot Minnesota and the Ordinances of the City of Orono. Applioanr's Signature Staff recommendation Approval Reason for denial: Denial Date City Council Action Date Date license mailed Aonroved Denied —y r.r U 1 ^ ,/ » t ”73 f 12Lbi iLi L. vl:. L WmR i 1 1992 m-- w. ■ki:m- IP r 't' b'W- :%.I'^i:> S- ■I .•# ;C. - ' } >'• ^ -'Vi ¥1'. • ■/ m^r. ■[• . CITY of ORONO (612) 473-7357 PoS't Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 SITE BVALDATOR/DESIGNER LICENSE application All questions must be answered. License fee and evidence of MPCA Certification must be attached. All applications are subject to a ten (10) day approval period. Business or trade name ^ Business address ^, /yl/AjAJ, ^ y Business phone ^79 - 3* 7 Residence phone ^7^--o7<^3 7 4.Name of applicantcompany representative(s ) holding MPCA certification A /g r' A ji. /? ^*^ >€. V o r /V 5. Type of certification held: designer. Certificate expirat Y Site evaluator V System , /7- ?/ - 6.Have you ever performed site evalna-i-ion or design work in Orono before? y^S Most recent year // 7.Have you ever had a license revoked? When? Where? _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,,i:7 SUBMITTALS REQUIBED:tin Of o^m a. •$100.00 License application fee. 2. Copy of current MPCA Certificate. r"-Ji:Mrr ~.cv~~z I C’l I A Ut- ♦ T ^ ^ f )| \i)/ > J, ..‘I A w'V V VV V LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARP SUBMlT^Efo 01 QEri i.W« \ Vu iA vv» J» V DrrrTOT-ruAi/V ynn i\uLuli t I \JU ?ne undersianed hereby makes application to the City#bSu!<>rib-tfi) >7/alnation and septic OJ/i.Minnesota, for a license to perform site e system design subject to the laws cf the State of Minnesota and the Ordinances of the City of Orono. Date -J3 ~ y / ~ ^ ^Applicant's Signature . rcol Staff recommendation Approval Reason for denial: _ _ _ _ _ _ Denial Date City Council Action Date Date license mailed Approved Denied .S.i. m:A APPLICATIONLIMITED LEGHOLD TRAP PERMIT 7;,I r,-. Name /d Application Number: P.> Address: .'SA37=-/r-/Zc ', Location of Tratillne; 'Z^^d>-5'/tL &'X(l^Zd’ycyC. ^/W;sT3 f Maintenance procedure for traplineiNumber of Traps: Period of time needed for permit: -7 ^ -7/ - d> 7e>2- d'- '7 *^ X Include vrritten statement of hardship ^ ^ id-/^ hV5/~~ AM»rdd Ta^ <ieic'V <5?/< 6L>it//(LU /5 /^ycy' /~/dC/c - /< a/,>/?X. .</^sgc^ /A/ dyc<i:S=/? f'e^c- T/</7c W /^" T2/A/Ad^ I agree to furnish a certified property owners list of property owners within 500 feet of trapping area. Property owners will be notified of application. I agree to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and Local Laws including ordinance 232. y / \4^o V /Sig e of~A>pilcant . y "£2. /. £-. Fee paid:, ^ _ Date;-2^2_^19 ry" RECOMMENDED: Yes 7 No %' Check Cash Initials h‘ 'a, Citv Adminisxratoi' ¥• ■ 0 Certified list of property owners within 500 feet of your trapline can be obtained from the Hennepin'^^unty Property 3< Description Office, A“6p3-County Government Cente^V'^^^'to’wn Minneapo^li,s ' Ji f^A'' ’ ^ r* ^ ‘ tiO~ ‘ Stephen X. Sullivan Chief of Police Jv' r Depaptmemt Administration 473-7710 Non-Emergency 525-6210 Emergency 911 Ra Box 86 1 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 445 Willow Drive Long Lake. MN 55356 Ip: -■me It" i- March 11, 1992 Dear Resident: The Orono Police Department has received an application from Mr. Bradford Blankenship at 2605 West Lafayette Road, to trap beaver that are causing damage to his property, as well as causing a significant hazard due to beaver tunneling into the lakeshore. This letter is being sent to all property owners in the immediate vicinity of the above property to comply with requirements of Orono ordinance. If you have an objecti n to the issuance of this permit, please contact the Orono Police Department prior to March 20, 1992. Cordially, Stephen X. Sullivan Chief of Police V-i. t*- %. X SS: sb / ■ Serving Nof^Ti Lake Mtnneton^a Communities of Orcno Long i3i<e \hnnefonmj Beach and Scf’mg Part* >! w- PHONE 612 296 6159 MINNESOTA OEPARTMFNf OF PUBLIC SAFEl Y LIQUOR CONTROL DIVISION 333 SIBLEY • ST PAUL. MN 55101 APPLICAT ION FOR CONSUMPTION AND OlSPl A . 1ST T UPl PFBMI7 5598 PERMIT FEE $150.00 PUBLIC Don Scherven-Cqrp.. Navarre Lane^ Co Rds 15/19, Box SI (Orono) Navarre, MN 55J9t « *.t . r 7J ''7 3 • / w - y f tf *|AMf AM’ Arr’Mf5? AMf '^nfUTtri MAAf C^TANiifS N srACf 5 BCLCA NOTE: ALL CLUB CN-SALE’ INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSEE’S ARE EXEMPT FROM APPLYING. AOpliCaAlt N«m« |0U«ln«ft. ncrmt tHIp c 0« pr>i •itOrt| A ■ CMy ______ SUlInttt Sl»«#1 oi Bo* Nu> *larn* «M I’HA /IfivjJM JML TCHUfY Tv' QprUEi# Cfut»joik nutlnttt Namt ButlAcit or C»ub M#i 9f*r __ [ /It y A' '1 I k c ' I I I»#*'»»*«#!’ ell I ( o»*»” t FAU : 'O Coo* E£J.1Z-__ Jt/AU AfQ/= LA.'/eO C J>c tirJUc w. .....wlof 0\«n*« //> AC- ClUo 5H UOiiNCis p*J nJTSrS 51LUO 6H B0!»»NCi5 pffnJTsrs j-'hiSM afi '. Fsr ABL. ISHMCNT tOTMtR OU^NtSS r5TABL«5MMENT» • S ABBLICATION B lj ca- 1 f A/. C .. . •’/JV.5 ,/?(FA-<'AA/>1/ A/J Ovvnei J[/^ I'F A’/e F AI/A j AF JCl 'SA I w'iLi A iN ’ f MnT i 1 n IjCT7A^ fMl ___ , ^ , TO I***'. BUSiratSS » 'IN l * I’S I r*C A T •' j | TTC) If Tm Aosrc H* f OHME M l ICE NSt ES OAMf Af4U ROSIN^is T »'A >4 AMi^ row A PUIU IC BUSINESS • I • PtMA«r|Hlp. Suit |N* N»me *n<j Add’fu o* C»cf* e*i jr^f. ii * Corpora! 'r» ii«* U.i nr i^d Aiiij»en of t *< OU k «» Cuilnoti P«rin*f/0*rittr p6AJ ScffFAl/^AA '/X2 y 7 huuxfiiLe^ /l o\ MoU N P Buimtu P«rintr/OI(lcrr i^U^r0U 3^ U bulintit in*f/OfBc** FOR A PRIVATE CLUB LcA^Th ol Tim* Cl’ito Ai Pt«i«At Lo(*ilOA> 'C^wb 6^nc*i/DW*cio» (flwb l| C*uO 0.lil'l»r»'| O».r*#0 O* 0*r*l*.1 c*ub 0*»l«#»/0«r*ClO» N*m* I’oe’ i<»f» M*.**!#! . •c«*>i r 0» *.*e •»’!>*' I * A S* • i ' . I A«1,» r u A!Jiett •X Has appiicani if partnership any poMnpf if corpor atinn an / of fir.pr of clirntof '•(lub any club off «cer or tfireciov evf had a license under the Minnesota liquor Control ^rt revoWpyj or suspernleri or iTem convicterJ fur any violation of State Laws Of local ofdinarrces, if so g»ve date and details A'______________________________________________________________ I I’Vifb* Ct'lfly lH|f |l*r <•* I»uf O* '’'’v i‘k«»n k jri.r '.Nf qt,* ’»• . h 'ith r».*r .or» f |j|.| ,tf *Q qr,* {>*r|m*n| inf o* «pn cONtt’iuift C«ui* *o' 'evocaimn O* IN’I pf.mM AfjYPfiiM'T »'Srf 11 ‘«f »»f t^( >r n pnf s I 4i l n*( SA'. f (jr iM L'^ iCAT inc L'QUOR ; NO CONSIOEHATION Wiu Bf GIVFN TO ▼rtl*’. APPiiCATlON UNLESS APPROVED AS PROVIDED BE LOW IF THE BUSfNFSS »S lOCATEU U4 A CJUMT t Aoo»n**tl - Cr***'P*'TO" Co*niy Bo*<P o» n«o>• r I ’ lUSrNESS IS LOCATC^ p. a VUNIC‘PAI •» » I A,,’hn».fy.* Aoi>*>ian) A/HZf3r D»’* If A I \ liB A I I AT n A r('T’y Qf the CONST TUTtON AND BVIAWS Of THE a OB AND A LURREf^T LIST OF Cow^C f or nfo»*jfni|i.,f M tool lift) X err/ "3 Vt'r\ S-#> > ■» *• l' •*X. :A • -f i i ; }. ii * S T « . « < * .* i'. y Ml ssssssss;s5S2^ss;iSgsss^sS22S^^^^*°"^^”-«s;5:;J2ss5;s; <AjfOOO(00<Otn|fc^^£)fO*^OOOOLnLJ^r«2^i2r^^*^^^^*^^®®^^®®00-^0<OOOOOOOt*iO lO N> 00 fv) ^ <l> •-* Ki ^ rrt/.»#.» ^ I ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ 00 OJ C7) K) CD n ►-• f J ^J tr> m ^ ^ »#-ifc n o CD CO —“»“S—rss=ti:;2SSSS3SS-^£KSi;ss:;-i:2s5ES§ m X 15 'D ^ ;d vji ili5>o?>55S§sg5;:55SS5s§??§$2;5f25{a**:zsl2::-i2-0i§^-§^§o ^Vi^m^C)2>x- iz . r-. o- hJ. I S, IC55S**5' 20f-mt/)wcn>-(“ i: ^?t ^ f^ 1•..: ,;;i •. v, :;. -t * V • % ’!i‘'.v';i|‘ IZ . ,-. 0--N,* S2' ^ *3: o- c •< 2 -2 . - ^ ^Or”JDmo230 I 2 3C »-«fs< m ^ " ■-' ■ ’» ■«> *" -----20f-mt/)wcn>-(i mv, *^**C>- • -< 02m3fQx</)3^0> 20 -»■ J>tD|--0nO2XI I (_,' ' ■ tnr>' SJ5‘ ^CC-tCO 2 ,-5" > Xm m to ON>o » T3 30 ro Q TJ :'‘1<’/:>3•‘•.r/..'-.'!'i J;i;W^W^«SJhCj5oo2Si2Sn22^5SooSo)SuiLnSS22"^"^ '^o^^oouDOooototDtJ t/10^^►^OOOOOCflQoOtOCOMilfcQ-OlifcfSj^ -^r CT)CDO»-*OCJ00CJJChifcCDrsJ "“’*»~'“»''»»-£S;SK£2SSES55SSS£S5Sgrsj3CSSS2S2iS |3SSSySSES2aE2=SgS2=g5SSKSS332SSS33gESSSEgS3S33 o 0jo > 0 ■< i/y —4 0 30 ^ ^ CO 0 -n M ----- - » <4 » • ' » • • tr*{• ;. ;• ;• 0 c 03Q 30:iQ Oni 030 0 Z OJ cr» cr» 2ft - •■: 'V* ‘ -1 ^V'lC^v** % !*«*< •. >1* 1 vVV *'’•Av. ft* >iC- C/)Z </)-H c : »• - «* I i *• - ■ .' * “•• i-'^y ■'* • .'A*ii‘ ; '-it- , • * ' »* ;/ », ^ »i ■»'■.■••' • yr • f *. iltf ' ■•'! • ' ft « = r ♦’; ^ 9' •# ‘>V^ •■ . "' \'!^C ' ' '• .•i ' , i! >i;Mi ■, ^ - *•; . •■♦ I 't '^JF- ‘!5-vi..-:/s • .■mi- • ••:'>.••«■ #.< • ■:‘ ^:, -4!?,-. t ,*. ; . ^.V^N :' ‘ • \hr- . . ' ■•••■•.•;»} «. • • ' '. -1 •» ,■‘1. .'’* :• '■.: mji *■•“ ‘i * .« •. ♦. *•■ . •■(V \ »^ ' '•■ • '-KS: * ' i •■.'■ .• S'f ■ . . »/; /. fityL:' V ♦ »/ j <* I • ‘V'-:.'i (Vf • '•.• *1. • * . . <• ••>: fi i ■•• 'dd \<:' ^ r>-h j '(V ' i V - '-(■ • ■ ' ^'‘^ 2''?^ t • • y'^-r. i-;J ' •• -i'4.V3;,' ,'. .••i-T'v ■-♦ * V* . • , :^*y/ ' I’. t' ‘^I'V-iVy'F' \ v#> rS‘V: 3 -' ff'-« / 4 ( i-; »'. •' ' .-vi'vir V> V -y-;;;;,;.:S1 ;.■'mm' ■■pi> !■'. '■ • -.. ••■ ♦’■'•,,»■,.. •> .*7 '3 • #_ ■ f V # t <* •. •.iy>'.!''t' VJ* itegajr 7 V (K :^ K' ‘‘' •*•!• •: v*^ ■■i' '}h hi I. tr ■•- ! (‘ Aw >’ ■o 'J I. I:B- m» » m » » O 00 CO o (O CD Kl lboo oo lb lb o Xm Mo K X-4 O o CO C/1 o> I ro CD I Co o 00 ui o (O oo ooooooooooooooooo 0000000000000000 00 00 09 00 00 oooooooc CJCJCOCJCJCA>CI(A>CJtJLJ(A>CJC^CJU)CA>ooooooooooooooooo o oo Ul o *-v» IS) » » Io :k C/) o Cs) CO ro oooo coco CaICO #b|k Uli/» 90o ►H </) >r- S! r* -H K> I K) CJ t Ul lb (O I CD » » » I o ooooooooooooooooo Ca)COCa>LJCJ(a)CJLJCJLJCOCJCJU>C jJOJCO ooooooooooeoooooooooooooooooooooco <OCO(OCO(OCO(OCDCO(OOCO(OtfMO(0(0 N)N)is)rs)fs)is)rofvjrs)roforsjN)K)fM»sj»vj CO CO ^ Ifc UlfOCDUtfOl-* ►— ^J CD ►- MCOCoro^uiN)a>coMOco'^N)K^ibLn^ OCO^|b|kU)O>O>JbCO(OtJ»~«'^a>CDOC0 orofvjooi^uiLnf—uicoifcO'^'^cDuiOH* OUlUC'jioouirouiocooLnibcooooo CDGOXXOOCOCDODCZ3CQOOCDOOODCOODOO rnmrnmmiTjmrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrn C/)(/>CO(/)C/)t/)C/)C/)C/)(/)C/)(/)</)C/>(/)C/)tO :«x:d909DX9o:o9090X)::o9o:o909o:d88888888888888888 9D:on^^::q^;Q:Q;o9D9QX);Q90-030ooooooooooooooooo C/)(/9C/)C/)C/>0')C/)(/)(/lC0C/>C/)(/>(/)(/)(/)(/) fnjjmmrnrnnirimrnfTirnfTirnmrn mrnmrnrnrnrnrnrnrnmmmrnrnmm >>>>>>>>«>>>>>>>>> (/)</)C/)OOC/>C/)(/)4/>C/>(/)(/)C/>00(/)(/)00(/) SgS5g5pgg|g2|ggg ___(ACeo<->cr>>QaoM </) Xc/J-IHC/) M "orn r“ om <o W-4<o> OOH^O* 0D(/)r-»-H3O >M -4-^zx» ^X^n> CQ H-4 mx X-< "noc/l-pozc/)(/)Ct/)OOx m -oOi m mrnm:^-H(^C c/)-h<-im#xc-i > > C»«0C-<>O-4O>r- Tl 9QCO»hC49Q I— X> 2t-4 OXC:rb-2> CD I M o >C I >2Cic—fvjm X -4-<<-ilS)C) > I >-O C/)>> mi~. > m ZK> c/> > -4 a: X r- § •sJ'v4^0^Jf^^K)^J^0K>^J^JOOCOOO CO N) II uu/l lb Da ^ lib U) ^ ^ > 1 1 I I I I I I I I I t I I I I CJtJCJOOU)CJtJCOU)COtOU)CA)U>COCOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOl* 0)uicj)Uiuia>cDuiuicncnuicnu>uiDbO <> I t I I I I I I I I I I I f I ^^|b^^^|bDfc|iA|btJ00K»fS)rs)fS)O cjcDooooooMfsjroroc -^ib|»^ooo tn000)0)OC7)CD'7)D)C00t>O<D'0OOO • I I I I I I I I I I * I I I I I ooooOOOOOOOOO'^lbiAibibOCb)C»ooooooooo»—roro»—K-o 1o to OU) <n ro 09 O-crn >D •n O JOo 90cro 9^ > 90 -H C/1 OO OO o o c oo 00 00 00 00 09 09 CjJ U) CO CJ LJ CJ U) OOOOOOO ^|b |b ^ lb Da |b o oo CJ o o oo CJ O o Xmo » * V I o to OOOOOOO CJ tJ CJ tJ CO CJ U) o CO *0 iO to iO to NJKJ ?S» fS» N) IS) KJ CO ISJ >>>>>>> 00 01 00 (/)(/)(/> c/1 OOOOOOOisiiiis CO H > 90 M M l-O-l K-f l~« Mzxzrzzz QOOOO O Q 00</)c/)00 00c/100 -<<-<•<-<-<-< C/)C/)C/)C/)00 00 00 m r* m o H 90 b-lo xxxxxxx X :0 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 91 90 90 rn m m m m rn m 90 m TJ > 90 O •H ✓) ■ I O 00 » » I o 9C 00 o CJ a > -Hm CD K) »— h-1— )— MIS)D^MKJMMMMM •— 1—CD LO OOCDCOCOCDCOCDCD U>U^-Nib OO Ul ^ ->J -aJ ^MM M Mto (O OOOOOOOO CJ CJ M M > c X -H > -I (?• <»H rn z-n O Oo 90 {/} •< (/> -Hm X -H M m -I r- m m X Tl X oo m 2 00 m o 90 IH •o H Mo O 'OOOOOOO O >>—•»—M o11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I o|b D» lb lb |b lb Di Db lb |b oIS)CJCJ CO CJ CJ CJ CJ M CO cCJMMMMMMMCJMzr>j 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 CJ O H111 fs)COM »— O O O O M cn zlbO) ^ O) <J> O) CJ lb lb oCDto to to to to to CD CD I 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 Db CD lb to »—• ^Dk COMMM CJUl M MM M • wz < CO CO fsj o o O 90o o Xmo 90 m O M 00 Hm m o CJ TJ I K) O CJ I CD H isj Xm CO to >om "O > Om I I I r V' - V . i^---:-V ?;v- »»«■■'- •; ■ . ;>r ;* ^ ■ CT'> ¥ K ■ % 0. ■ ,.vV-.^ i/fS m- IV » » » » » » o 00 to M O) (O oto to N) oooo oo <m 90 H 90 > M inm 90 < I lb to t/1 o K) to I to ooo to M 00 o CO to K) U1U1 trcn oo oooo 00 oo 00 00 to CO to CO tncncncn 0)000 oooo to to CJ to to (O toto M N) ^O^J 00 1-0)0 Ul^tOCM oa>iouio CJ CO >^0D »— O (•) C) CD mmmm cccc nmmm T9 *T? 'OTJ >>>> 9D 90 90 90 t/ (/>0>(/) OOOO OOOO o 00 CO ro t/i o o CO to M f^lb in ui OO OO O Ozz > Q >z Qm zo “n -Ti o c •DTJ-CO as:>>>>>n H 'TI to H!90 CO Z to to cot/)PICKUPo m u M U M O LJ 00 V. CO *n r*m X M U) •o M Dm 8 zoinm C-f m -4 90co X o 00 tJ n U) oooo oo 00 09 00 to lij tJ U9 CD CD U3 (£> CD (O (O to O OO CJ lb rj o 00 CO CO o ooo CO K) o CJ O ' . o o to CO CO (O o CO o U) o to oo ro fiS U3 (O (O ro r j ro CD K) to K) CD ^J 1— H* LO to cn cn 'O cn cn cn ISJN)»— ►—^ lbIS)K)cn cn O cn cn cn cn OO toto cn cnCO to oo coocncnto cn cn oo ►— 1—OO rooo ON)OO CD to ooto CD OO tDOOOCD 1 » OO N)N>oo »»»a oo 913 >>>to 90 zmTJ ^ TJ C m S 90 90 90 TJ z 90 Z •-•►H HI TJ -H CD rr-f r*>»-♦ H4 r-z >“♦toZmmm tn to mmm o o 'O o H-ifctoroK-►—(O ►— t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1lblb Db lb lb u ►—|a K)rsJMNjfj to tn t— CO CO to to to 0»o cn H-MfONJfsJ o o N> 1 till 1 1 •o cncn tnro •—o ►— to to <n lb lb 00 o fo to OtDtOtO cn o CD 1 lilt 1 1 1 1—to to to lb CO o to (OKJ»—K>cn o oooo I « I I /kl ^ ^ CO CO CO K> ooo»- ^ o I I I I oooo cncr cn cn CD CO CD CD fill I lb ro 0 1 ^0 CD I CO cn is> I 1^ Di |b lb ro CD I to b b b b »•a »a a»b b »b X a a •»b b »m a a a a ■1 O inb* 1o 1o 1o o 1o « o o 1 o 1 oXXXXXXXXXtototototo to tn to CO to O 90 > C Mz Q t/1 “D O Za to IS> cn I |b CO 0 cn 1 09 0 1 o o ozrn O X o > > c m Z90ZZ o o o90OOOOooorr* rr*TJ f““n O •Ti-nx-n -<o *n X z HI < to m m rn m o ►H z moc>zzrn m m m T9 r-o oX 90 90 90 z oX►H H4 »-l*H TJ r*ocOOOOz►H z90xxxxT)CXI -«(0(0(0 ta IH m rr|oooo z z ZZZZ o H4 o M Hm Z om too 90 Ht •TJ H M O > O Ooc zu z < zm 00 to > om to to fo o ►-4 O •< O-n Oro Ozo ozmo X m o M t/1 Hmz 0 to 1 ISJ to I to Kj •D om g‘:r 0 t*; t'* 4%'" ?/•, y.. r' *.. V*' .'V W'II: »» » » » » » » I o t/> o00 CO Ik in CO »» » » » M oOO CJ U1 ooo CJ Oh CJ (O ooooOOOO 00 00 CJ CJ CJ CJ ^ Oh Ik Ok CJ CJ U)CJ ^ *>J ''J o00 CJ Iko ooo CJ CJ CO cn ooo CJ CJ (O CP ooo tJ CJ oo cn o o 00 00 CJ CJ K)M oo 00 oooooo 00 09 00 CJCJCJCJ roro Kjfj ^ --4 cncn cn c/1 O CJ o tJ o CJ oooo CJ CJ CO CJ o CJ o CJ o CJ CD KJ CD fO CD N> CD CD CD CD ^ J rsj r j ro CD CD rj CD rj ho hj CD N) <7) hJhO K)hO Oocm m r- O oooo m £)c M i CDm 30 OOOO -n^ -n-n "n O 30 o oooozzzz (7) O O O 30 >o H O XI >>>> mmmm T> > 30 -o > JO -o > 30 r“*D“DM •nOf-z-I >o h-CO CO C/) ICO -c HHcnci > •HO Tl > H 30 Zm "n zm o O HOOO H*hJ H*C a ) k- ►— 1—• 1 1 1 till |h Ih |h Dk Ik IkN)ISJ fO CJCJCJCJ CJ CJ CJ Ik tjrjw-* hJ Ik fs)Ik ISJ cn I I 1 1 1 1 1 IS)t/1 N>*/* I-* fsJ Hh Ik <7) fs) IkCJ CD CD to CD CDCDO 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 Ik CD Ik CD CJ Ik U) ISJ 1—hJ M ISJ ISJ )* » V I n c/> » » » I o X CO « ■ ♦ o X 00 I o X C/) 1 o X (/) o o >c o zoz “n m I 0 :o m z > z fsjcn o CJ OO OJCJ oooo CJ CJ (jj CJ 00 oo CD r j CD CD ^J N> CD CO CO CO pjhofsjho •H'O k-i-*u) cn j>Ik Ik I-* 1—OO M I-*O C7) CJ I— CO men Ik Ik cn cn CJhJcn tn K)fs)cn cn Ik O) C7»C3 CJ CD O)CJCJ CHM ^ OO COCO h- ►-^OOlkhJhO CO u OO o o ->4 O O OOOOOOOC3> ooocjcn oo oo cn m 00 00 OOO »«*k »»•»»m hOfSJUIh- Ih CDC/IOCJf- coH-Mocn ho oo -HC-n 00OO0)N> O hj o o •>) "4 ^ O OO k-cn 1—►-*CJhJ Ikl—K-l— 1 1 1 1 I 1 till Ik Ik Ik Ik Ik Ik |k |k |k fs)CJ CJ hJ CJ u>H* CJ O Ik ►-OO cn cn cn cn fs)cn >—O O) 9)k-* I— 1 1 I 1 1 i 1 1 I 1 ISJ Ik »—hj cnen Ln ISJ K- k- Ik OO hJ Ik cn Ik CD^^hO CD O CD <D CD (D O CD Ik CD 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1IkOCJ|h CD CD CD |h CJ CJ nj o rsj N)i-cjfs)cj»— » I o X </> X CO * 9 I o X CO o Xm O X zo O > > c z H r*X X X oo oooo >z o m OO ZZZZz>m >z z oooooczX<X X cccctozmmmZZZZ <m m z z z mO>Z -<xxxxczCOCOC/)(0 mmmm o*-*o H-H >>>>ozm00Q>>r-rr-r-zz—1 z HH -HH-HHoCO>c mm XXIXoozQzaOOl-MH >zz ZZZZozm m oooooOOOz>> CO mn-c nr* CO m m >>>>k-ccm m ZZZZ -HzCD CD ZZZZ mzH-O-O-f X r“"H m f— f— f*- p* ►H m m ommmmtoZZZZ00 00 CO CO 00 o z »-« z •H O >o ooc ►Hz < Xm CO CO > om CD CD KJ O ►H H •< oz Oz oz o ft! O X zm o M C/I Hniz 0 CJ 1 K) CJ I CO fSJ z >o m t-'v k,: ^V 0 >■ v^ oo oooo 0)U> •^-si cnui oo U)W OOOd €O«0 rsjfs) -4H OO §8 -4H oo r-r-mm MH4 Z2L OO o 09 CO vl •si O CO (D M r»i ¥-4 E H4 z in » » » » » » o oo CO sj o o CO CO fs^ in H;d m •H o m in "D > 9Q O oo CO CO 0} o CO to N> 0)0) oo •sl^oo OOl coco cncn OUl • #oo incn oo OO oo a»o>oooooocpcnoo inHni M om z o o z CO H oo in i-t oz PC "D > -< Zmz •H oo o o N) M •—cn 1 1 1 1 1 aiiai aikcocoMrocn *n CO M roK)•S)K)»— 1 1 1 1 i 1-0 M M asb N)<D K>N)09 CDCC CO CD o 1 1 1 1 1 COM CO to O Msj M M O O 00 CO o CO (O M OO oo oo o hH X ►H m "Dm z 0 1 o Xrn Z Sj fO I CO K) I cn CO I to o 00 to o> •si U1 o CO to rsj 70 or~ Mz (/) o t-4 oo 0 V— 1 ro O) O I o o 0 1 o o o oo CO CF> O) CO o 00 Cs) cn CO 00 O €X> Ucn (O Sj o oo CO c^ oo fO oo oo oo CO CO cn cn s| ^ O CO O CO o CJ o CO oo CO CO 00 00 CO ro CO rsj CD fsj to M CD CO tJ ^o om 70 > "D c CD O>zm z > M z (D M O m Z-o -c I—m m > in (A o O >z Zm>rn z m • -AzCO<z z fzOm>mor“m r~z O CJ Q>z •z l-H \momzMmmCO1 M r-cn Z •-ITI Z> >co r- T3 :d ►H Z Hm ?o oo oo <30 COCO cn tn 0>C7> roN> CO CO N>h0 09 00 C7) Qi N)M to rsja^ D»09 00 M M N)M cncn cocnoo M M M CD CD CD CO » M oo sJ -s|cntno (0 0)0 roK>Sj -nJ oo cncn rono ouo a^oo a»CJ^I^O) o>oo CJ CO oo ooo M cn 00 a »»»m *a cc -I-I »-c »-t •-IKI »-4»-4 mm (/) ^ I ro t 0 1 cn fO I fsj to I fO CD I CJ f— a a »a a a a 4 a*a »a a k a a aa»a a a »a a a» O 1 o i O » o t o » o 1 O 1 o « oXXXXXXXininininCOinCOcnCO O Xm o X zo oo 'JCO o > »-* ►- 00 00 i oo zz•nm C9C0mm MM OO Z Z <mm mzz z oz z o88z oomm ZZ m Z om tn oz rH *D o o o oo •slO >»-•M M M COM O 1 1 1 1 1 1 O f j aa a^a^i ooCOCON)coco cooaa CO r 'N>z M ono DbJa H 1 1 1 1 1 1oMM M cn^ZoISJNJcn CD ooaaCD CO CDO 1 1 1 1 t 1oCJCOCO(DO)Mo(O M M N3 M z < CD CD fO O ¥-i H -< om Oz O m O X z m Q M (/) m z 0 CO 1 M CO I CD fO Zm (A c/^ > C> m > Q m a a a . .r' - k. » » » » » O 00 CO COocn o 00 (O COocn o oo CO COo o oo CO COo CO o oo CO COo M oo 00 oo CO CO CO COoo o 00 CO 00 CO C) o oo to oo o o O o O OO O oCJCJCJCijCJ(jJ Uf W CJ *’>»V. h-M 1—►—>— V—»—►-* 00 00 00 oo cw 09 09 no oo \V.\ CO CO CO CD CD CD CD CO CO IS)K)fs>fs)rj M M r J » oooooo • • oooooooooooo m 9 cocococococo • 9 oooooooooooo 9 » LnLnc/u/icnLf» » oooooo CO CO CO CO CO CO CX5 oo 00 oo oo oo CD 03 CD cn (C (O fo ISJ fo isj f O o oo CO cncn o CO cn ro e oo CO 'Nj oo 09 o CO " »s (O Kl o Xm o X 2 O O > CO CD N) O -H •< o in O O Ul IS) o t/1 00 ut i/I, . Is) IS) 0)0) • t O) cr> ro fsj 1— >—N) IS)N) ^IS)fs)fS>O) o>h-» •—09 ^ 43b O) O)Xb 4b 09 C a ) N) in ^J '«g o>cncn oo tJ CJ O) OCJ QO 09 CJ CJ rs) CJ 00 OO oo oo CJtO #3b (SJfSJ CO CO oo cjfsj 4^ cn 00 'Joooooooo^ N) IS)•— »—CJCJ ^ ro isj ^ o) CO »»»»»»»m K) rsj CJCJ cn o CO CO CP) CJ tn CJ CJ 43b 4b Ococoooo > 6c 2 ■H r • ^ L J C 3 H O •H > CO > c Hm 30 Hm o zc 2 1-4 0 1 "O > c a M o > z 2 -<o 30 > to iA 8 a > 30 m COCO mm IX mm C > H m 3Q 30 8 Co H (/) Oo o m 2 X Om m m in tooo »-» 2 O O o S 2 z oo X 2mrnmXm>2 2 •<>2 O s •<Z 2 cc D 2m-<g3 0)m zz 2 —4mm00m>to >o 2 Q 2 CO zr-X (/)2 to c H X M X 2•n m »-4 to ►-t 2 mc<TJ v»2 f“X2>to M -4or-o mcXCO >o c r: c c c c to (/) i/> c/) to to cca:ci:cm m m m m m to CO CO ,o to to OOOOOOiiiilicccccc OO-h O-h -i >>m>fr m > >no>mm ■o -DTI :^:®O30OO8RS8mm c 2 M m O 30 Zto c 2r~ •-4 X >-4 •H m o c 2 M m O 30 Z00 30 •-I to -H > -4 m T3 Cz "O D > 30 <m 2O O 30 m Z o m to O 30 no “C »-» O 2 O Xm o 2 30 m Q (O -Hm 30 i'I'' IS / - 1^-m k-]y e> » » t o 3^ CO N)o o o O oo 'g4b4-b- b-b-b- b-bj K)1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4b JW 4b 4b ^ 4b Jb CJ (a )CJ CJ ro IS) PM bJ PMO0»o 09 4b b- ►—U CJ OI o O)O CJ OO PM ro 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1o►-*o b-MO in \no(a )N)CJ tj '•J tJ lb 4boou>CO CO CO 4b CD (D COI11111 1 1 ( O ►-*CJ b-O)PJ b“*CD cnofO•—nj b-tJKJ b-b- » I o CO « ■ ■ Io:x CO » M n to ^ '-J 'goo o I I 4 I I I C a ) to U) U) to u> CO cn K) t/1 fsj N> cncn ocno o t I I I I I CO cn cn o OiUShOi -sJKj CD CO CD CO cn CD I t I I I I CD CD <D Ui CO nj K • c/1 »— Io CO o '-J > b-CJ O 1 1 o 4b 4b o PM PM c PM CJ 2 ►—PM -4 1 1 b-cn 2 fS)cn ocnCO •fuCO 4H b-PM 2 < » » V Io:k CO » » to to Xm to >Om 0 CJ 1ro Ca) » CO fo > O m 0 (Own ♦— to 00 00 00 ^ N) ^ NJCON)l/l^ O) cn o to CO 'O to (D 00 IM *N| (O 01 O) O) O) -^*0 0 o O) ^ro tn»- o Ho H > -n^-n-n-n^ cccccc OOQOO ^ ^ ro N) N) ^ to KM/1 ^ CO OOOOOO “H *H -H "H -H -H >>>>>> r;V* 0- WiA. "'■mi o ICm O a > > c $ s ocoC •nx M om>me Hr-C-H 90Z m•nmm Xm X 90 90 ooM ooooxenm C TJ-O TIH (/>9omrti 90>o (/)9DP0 OH 90m>><m M -H-H m “O 0»-<M >H "OZZ 90»H MmoomoO 90 <z > *T| "n oo HCC r-O<z •Ht9oZom ■n c O m* >oooc •-4z < «v X i/> > Q m iO iO K> O H -< o 'll o:>o Ozo o Xmo PC 90m D M (/) m 90 0 CO 1 K) CO I CO KJ 'O >o m O 0 r - ^ 3CX OO tfMO DO tOtJ <OCO OO tJCJ OO O) o> to CO ISJN) sssssssssss (OCDCOtOtOtOtOtOtOtOtO OOOOOOOOOOO tJCJliiCOCAJCJU>COU>(A>CO OOOOOOOOOQOOOOOOOOG009 OOOOOOOOOOO CA>CA)COiOCA>CA>CJU)CAi(x)U) OOOOOOOOOOO Cn0)C9>CJI0>09C7>cn{7>C7)(7l CDCO'^COCDCOCOtOCOtOfO MMlSiMrsJK>fOfsJKJN)fsJ Xc> to o LJ o CJ o o to ho Xo to o CO O) o CO V. o at to ro Xo to o CO cn O CO Ocn \ to hj Xo to o CJ o CO o cn CO ho X D to o CJ to o CO ocn to ro X o <o o CJ tj n CO o cn \ to ro Xo to o CO o CJ ocn \ to hj nooonooooo tocotototoiototototooooooooooo COLOCJU>COtOCJCOCOU)oooooooooo oooooooooo COCOCJCJCJCJCJCJCJCO oooooooooo cncnojcncnojcncncncn totototototototototis rsj hj rvj rsj ro Kj Nj fsj hvj r j X XoO O tototoXCOoomN>K)hO oto00X o .MzHo-< Oo-nOo> Ca>LJ H O\V,mOo acncnzoCOto hj hj U ■ < 'v/a- : X*- M._ ¥ >. ■• f’ iV ¥ \‘* w ;c;- S:# ; K' .' F >■ f £4- $ wti r f'. i'‘ f r* i#. P Xo to X O trt Xn t|A Xo #r> Xo Xo to O •M ►— to O o JFV o Js>. vw o #»V o ►v %o o Xm lO Nl > LH ♦* CO N) A O 1 J X o ■ ^ 2 rH H # O -< ♦ O o o O o o • o > O "H to *N. to •n. to to to to —4 o^r% o rn QC7>orn Orn o rvi o rf% m O to to #r% \0*wl \ to wt to Zo IS)»s> \AZ ro K) UJ ro ISJ rOtJNXD •— W IS) CF> <D oo cn ►— o> o CJ to UtNJ oo v4 to cn tn tn CO to 00 00 OO 009009K)K>CJ to CO to H OO OO OO oo OO ooooOOooOOoooo »»9 »»» if)o o X “H 2-H >o Q XO-T| -T1 -T1 -T1 “n >o > -4 cccc m O -H <z o>Z Z Z 2 c m 2 o < f“oooo DO A .H 30 r-r-mml/>M r*2 O 2 >X z m 0 r>» to IS) ►—m M 1/1 CD o2•D m 3D -H -H -1 -H Moooozm -H ~l -H o X >>>>nm CD t/) C C>U)O CO -n -n Orti >m TJ o m m m m f“CH2 m 2 X m in m•nmmm o -T1 M X 2 3D 2o >CO o > OOOr->~l m 2 C -0 “0 r--a7D rn rn "n r-o CO 2 30 c:K-t CO m>>2 z hH HHO Q -4 O»-«►-< 'DZ 2 niQO ;3o > Ti*n •HCC ►-^Z zzooo •▼1o r.-'“. rpr%,v. ft- <» » » I O ;x «/> I Izc J> r- c > 3: >zc > f— 2 >zc > zc > z > 2 C > M Hmz om </» O 21 M TJ H M O 2 o o o o O o > »—►-»►—►-►—1—>o 1 \1 1 1 1 o ►—19 4k Ik _ootoCOCJtotoctncni/I O o o 2oatatCJicnat-4 1 I 1 1 1 fooK-»h-*M ZoCJK)K>N)M oo<£>(C to CD to « 1 1 1 1 1 Io»-•CJ CO CO CO IHofsi►-2 Zm t/7 t/> >o rn O Xmo 3Dm O M (/) H fn 3D O KJ I fsl to to N) •o >om '! ■••- ■• •l*.y fey ^ i-'k. if¥ ’’ p7 <,■ r ». i .■a^ ,i5%^^ » K? iZ'j^‘ E27 fa==. '§ o; A- .. **'-!V- ■ S-‘ t-:'" h. »■ tr ?r ^;^-- ?fe- COUNCIL MEEHNG MAR 2 3 W92 CITY OF ORONO % V- 1v >; :'^ i-_.W‘0 Is,m. 1^ ^ .•••s ••s COUNCIL MEETING MAR 2 3 1992' CITY OF ORONO fe K 1^-fe'-'- tp'" '' lias t^-*t 'V?- t ■ •7 ..4T Ct-- -- -•1•' f»i.'.';£?.'■ ■-s;-.t •‘>--’C •.''-.i ' JILdfce Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission• v; - “►V L'- ‘‘ ' k |K:'>,'5 t M '> /*'• *i ■!- .tj' pa.fei::, m^- ■ ■1%. iif*'- if* yi' -i' ?5i.tea r-VViy-' »■ vv’y Vy fev-'. V# ■ ■ ■y\r< •\ V. - 1^;- ■ fete, r' te.' KS-' is* '■' VI. Adjournment 443 OAK STREET • EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA G5331 • (612)474-5539 lINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMlSS0Q|{f|0|L |\||EET1Nn EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING p "2 ^99 TUESDAY, MARCH 17, 1992 tep 5:00 P.M. ROOM 204, EXCELSIOR COMMUNITY CENTER AGENDA u c C*\ f C'C'J^.0 f‘ N LliLSii=^u C----- I.Call to Order II.Approval of February 1992 Minutes Ill.Reports a)Officers:Treasurer b)Administrator/Production c)Triax MAR 1 1 1992 Unfinished Business a) Update on Office/Stud1o Relocation b) Update on Channel 6 Reception Concern 0 March 1992 Subscriber billing Changes and Notification New Business a) Concern by Police Chiefs over marKeting by Triax b) Contacts with each city regarding assistance to distribute the "Newsletter" c) Current status of H.R. 35bu d) Annual audit for 1991 e) Letter of Credit change from Fleet bank to Fleet/Norstar __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ __ fr ^ i . • . ’ ■. ' *iiSf'.■■■,' If" ft'tt-A te„ i 5S^?’ LAKE MINKETONKA CABLE COMHUNICATIONS COMMISSION FULL COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 1992, 5:00 PM AUDITORIUM, EXCELSIOR COMMUNITY CENTER 443 OAK STREET, EXCELSIOR CALL TO ORDER ^ c ,o d mChair Brancel called the meeting to order at 5.12 P.n. DIRECTORS PRESENT Barb Brancel/Shorenood Ann Thies/Medina Jim Oldfl/Excelsior Dale Moe/Deephaven Tim Pattrin/Orono Tim Salazar/Minnetrista Otto Wilczek/Minnetrista Lesley Hughes-Searaans/Tonka Bay Bobbi Abdo/Minnetonka Beach Jerry Schmlog/Victoria Kay Hirsch/St. Bonifacius OTHERS PRESENT Jim Daniels/Administrator Colleen Lindskoog/Admin Asst. Jim Schindler/Product. Coor. Paul Nazarow/Triax Mark Oyaas/Metro Cable Network Channel 6 II, APPROVAL OF MINUTES Brancel asked for discussion or motion to approve the minutes of brought^^to^^Ittentlon the foot, that his name had been omitted in the minutes. Brancel asked for any otht. changes. rki.4 (potion 2.16.92.18 Hughes-Seamans moved to approve the minutes. uics seconded. The motion passed unan.imou;>.\.v . Ill, REPORTS Treasurer *s Report Wilcsek explained the 4th Quarter/Year End Report. The 1991 franchise fee has been received. There is S8,000 more than was previously budgeted for in the 1992 budget. Olds requested the Chair to appoint a committee regarding the budget bexng updated, volunteered for the committee and asked for other volunteers. Wilczek, Pattrin also volunteered. Olds is a stand-by volunteer. Motion 2.18.92.2; Wilczek moved to approve 4th Quarter/ Year End Report. Salazar seconded. The _ Wilczek explained purchases of various CD s with the £ran*>.his fee.Motion 2.18.92.3; Wilczek moved to approve the Just Claims for the period of 1/1/92 through 2/4/92. Pattrin seconded. The motion passed unanimously. Administrator*# Report ^ ^ . mai-ta Daniels stated his enjoyment of attending the Annual MAC Convention. He also announced his appointment to the MACTA ° Directors and feels with this appointment that the LMCCC is well represented at both the state and national levels. .m.w'o Daniels also discussed his trying to enhance the visibility within the community. He has agreed to apeak at a c u r.:: . ft :r'f,y S' ]'.■t, >v:.. I'"'- i. Z’- '. #■iS,:te^.. hisi. fh •I. Mi' "e; ;■ ’^• V: ;r- LMCCC February 1992 Minutes Page Two event at Commissioner M#»rkle'a request. Daniels extended this offer to any commission m*'.(nber who would like him to speak at an event. Re-emphasizing the necessity to enhance LMCCC visibility, he also ex tended an offer to every city within the commission to appear at council meetings and encourage cablecasting for these meetings. Daniels brought to attention that as of the February (1992) vote. Excelsior Community Center will no longer be available for the studio and office. He has already begun the search for a new place to relocate to but is also open to suggestions or help. Hughes- Seamans asked about the time-frame prior to this move. Daniels said that approximately 90-100 days seemed likely. Pattrin asked the feasibility of separating studio and office. Daniels prefers to keep them together. Wilczek concurred with Daniels due to a limited staff and costs of two offices. Production Report Schindler distributed ^he Production Report. He explained that there are 12 new programs wityi the spotlight being on Senior Corner, produced by Jan Gray. Local Chamber of Commerce which, hopefully, mill be on-going and workshops should continue. We also have a new producer - 11 year old student, Mike Mara. He tapes his sister's basketball games, which are cablecast in communities outside of the LMCCC as well. The "On The Air With Jer" will now be a live call-in show. Triax Report Mazarow distribv»ted the monthly subscriber report for February 1992: Homes Passed Basic Subs Expanded Basic Subs Total Pay Units Total A/O's Total Remotes 11,916 105 5,969 3,574 3,971 2,288 Nazarow also circulated Channel 20/21 Programming Summary, the Mews Bulletin which will be going into statements regarding the mat ter of the •franchise tax", a press release which will go into the five area newspapers, and a letter to the Commission regarding the Cable Cops. Pattrin asked if the News Bulletin will go to customers outside of the 14 communities of the LMCCC. Nazarow stated that it would Just be for the LMCCC communities. Thies asked about the dollar amounts shown on the bulletin, if they would be specific amounts or if they would be a generic amount of dO.OO. Nazarow stated that the News Bulletin would go inrc all subscribers statements and that the dollar amounts are generic and will remain as they are shown. IV. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) Presentation by Regional Channel 6 Staff Regarding Unacceptable Cable Carriage Chair Brancel introduced Mark Oyaas. Oyaas explained he was an interim executive but would try to answer any questions the 5 <■:i^r ■K m v‘ a;" LHCCC February 1992 Minutes Page Three Commlasion might have. He also explained that Channel 6 received no funding from the state or counties and are dependent upon distribu tion fees. Oyaas said that the signal for Channel 6 is carried by Midwest Cable and Satellite and he knew the reception in some areas was not the best and asked for input on improving it. Daniels stated it Is technically unacceptable when Channel 6 comas Uiicugn at all. Daniels also felt that it should be defined as to whose problem it is. Wllczek stated he supports the concept of Channel 6 but not the problems it incurs and that the quality in this area is sporadic at best. Oyaas promised to make this a priority and to try to fix it. Daniels then offered to meet and work with Oyaas and Nazarow to find a solution. Brancel reiterated the Commission's willingness to cooperate. Nazarow offered the possible solution of licensing so that Triax could retransmit the signal. Daniels stated that the video Itself has a pronounced effect on the reception. Brancel then requested Daniels, Nazarow and Oyaas to work together to get the problems resolved. b) Renewal of Channel 6 Fees Brancel requested that the renewal of Channel 6 fees of .10/subscriber, approximately $600, be tabled to the April meeting. Pattrin reminded Commission that technical problems are Triax's con cern. Daniels agreed but thinks that Commission has an obligation as well to be involved with decisions. Motion 2.18.92.4; Wilczek motioned to table to the April meeting with the direction to Daniels and Nazarow to make progress repor'^ v the March meeting. Thies seconded. Motion passed unanimously. c) Triax Report on Fifteen System Extensions for 1992 Nazarow explained that the extension activities were postponed due to the October 31st blizzard. He distributed the list of exten sions that will happen (see attached). d,e) Triax Sample of Customer Billing "Stuffer" and Triax Latest Marketing Effort Both of these items were discussed in Triax's report. Plan f) Quarterly Newsletter Report Daniels distributed a rough draft of a newsletter. He ex plained the costs of printing 1000 copies would bo under $150, in cluding photo sizing and placement. The only question remaining is the distribution. One possibility is with muriicipalities and with newspapers as an insert. This way it can be sent out into a targeted area. Brancel commented that the draft looked professional and she liked the layout. Hirsch asked what the contents would be and if it would be upcoming events or past-tense news. Daniels said both is feasible. Schmieg asked who would be targeted, cable subscribers or non-cable subscribers. Daniels was not sure of distribution so, therefore, areas are harder to target. Wilczek stated that it should be aimed at the non-subscribers so they will get cable and see cable access channels. Wilczek reiterated the need to get the community . . LHCCC February 1992 Minutes Page Four Involved and that Daniels would be open to suggestions. Wot^lon 2.16.92. St Olds motioned that we spend the $150 on a first edition and place them in public areas so people can pick them up if interested/ meantime continue to investigate other possible methods o£ distribution. Hughes-Seamans seconded. Motion passed unanimous- ly. g) Employee Compensation in Lieu of Insurance Wilcsek explained the reason for compensating Daniels $200 in lieu of health insurance was that with so few full-time staff a group rete was impossible to get. Motion 2»18«92»6: Hirsch motioned to compensate Daniels. Wilczek seconded. Motion passed unanimously. few ■■ - V. MEW BUSINESS Wilczek asked about moving the office and studio. Daniels stated that he would try to have a propos.l at the March meeting. Pattrin wanted to let the Commission know that he ertjoyed the MACTA convention and the the GTE spokesperson was very good. Motlpn 2.16.92.7: Olds moved to meeting was adjourned at 6:35 p.m. adjourn. Wilczek seconded. The ft: r-%: Respectfully'Submitted/ V/dU'h Colleen LindskoC^' Administrative Assistant t. ,ui«afciv?.a -------------------------T ,rjm->^~i% 17- .-r ^''^i, ’T"'•:v.V^S.- ■'.;{,r. ^onka Bay 1-1 ^liinetonka Beach Txceli ior Sborewood Spring Park Jrono m0^- mJ.. LAKE HINNETTONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSIONMonthly Report February, 1992 EXPND HOMES BASIC PASSED SUBS GAIN (LOSS) 606 221 1,237 1,807 739 2,285 3A5 120 500 1,199 301 l,Ul (1) (2) (8) (8) (3) (10) TOTAL SUBS: 6,07A 50.97% BASIC GAIN ONLY (LOSS) 9 1 18 22 7 17 Txxig Lake 784 370 (3)8 Jreenwood 275 116 (2)1 Deephaven 1,525 669 (8)9 lioodland 190 96 0 1 Medina 586 260 (3)1 /ictoria 651 405 (6)8 wilnnetrista 607 263 (5)3 3C. Bonifaclus 403 184 (2)0 W-11,916 5,969 (61)105 k' ^50.09%1.7% 0 0 (2) 3 0 0 1 0 (1) 0 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL TOTAL A/O's PAYS 225 lAO 173 936 110 862 195 83 502 82 175 239 190 59 3,971 (18) TOTAL RBMOTES PROMO EXPND BASIC 215 125 0 87 57 0 205 156 8 745 465 1 158 106 0 748 485 2 234 132 2 63.42 0 422 282 2 79 40 0 162 84 1 185 124 1 160 108 0 111 82 0 3,574 2,288 17 (23)(33)13 Ki.-; E ---------------«• ’ i-- 1: b- 4- ¥' I- L ‘ ' Jt'' »•»I »/,;r ^ TRIAX■II CABLEVISION Triax ap^ edates this opportunity to darify !wo recent changes to your cable TV bill and to inform you In advance of a format chang 5 w hich will occur on March !■ 1992. On January 1, 1992, our cable rates were Increased fl^e percent, primarily due to Increased operating costs and the rising cost of buying top quality cable TV programming. At the same time, your cable TV bill was changed to Identify the franchise fee which Triax pays to the Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission. The franchise fee Is not a new fee — It has always been part of >our TV cost and pays for local programming services and regulatory oversight. These two coincident changes have caused some confusion. Therefore, Triax Cablevlslon will Include the franchise fee In your cable rate rather than showing it as a separate line Item. Effective March 1, 1992, your cable bill will look like this: Cable Service Sales Tax Amount Due $0.00* 0.00 $0.00 •Five percent (5%) of all rates Is a franchise fee paid to the Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission. For example If your cable service is $22.04 per month, $ I 10 of that amount Is the franchise fee. Thanh you for your continued patronage and we hope you wll contact us If you have any questions. ‘*»'^*/* ^ t T, ,.»• 14 WUKLYNEWS March 5. 1992 LJ Reports What's Happening in the Westonka Area Chamber of Commerce By Marge Friedericlu, Executive Director I have been on staff for the West .nka Area Chamber for four months as of this writing. My last article I used to simply introduce myselL This time I ran share some information on chamber activities. From an office operations perspective, changes include upgrading our computer system to use WordPerfect 5.J on our documents and newsletter. It also includes a laser printer and an excellent accounting package for the chamber. Helping us get set up was ji.i 3iand of Westonka Computing FYom the perspective of providing more information on chambers in general and the Westonka Area Chamber in particular, lam writing a weekly column in one of the area's weekly newspapers, this periodic column, and providing a.idition.aI informa tion to the Weekly News, which is graciously editing and printing it for you My latest adventure into communication and that of the Greater Wayrata Area Chamber and Excelsior Area Chamber also, is a monthly videotaped program by we three chamber executives, discussing chamber activities around the Lake. The program will be taped monthly with the help and instruction of Jim Daniels, executive director of the Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commissioa The program » is designed to inform people of chamher activities and. in particular, what’s happen ing in these three chambers because there are a lot of common elements around the Lake. The program is called Lake Minnetonka Chamber Program, airing in the V/estonka area on Channel 21. Check your local cable listings for the exact time and station in your area And, of course, we all solicit your comments and suggestions regarding the program. The Westonka Area Chamber has 'jeveral very busy committees. The Government Affairs Committee, chaired by Ditk Indritz of Reed and Pond, meets the first Thursday morning of each month at the Mound city offices. Representatives of public agencies meet with the committee to provide information and answer questions. The Employers Committee, chaired by FYed Guttormson of C.R Manufacturing meets the fourth Wednesday m ming of the month at the Lafayette Club. This is a group of employers who meet i. -.ally to discuss issues related to busir ..ss by sharing ideas and suggestions. F cample, on Feb. 26 the subject was •'Employee Morale," and those present shared information on incentive programs and just plain fun activities, desig.ned to provide a good working environment The Weston.ka Business and Professional Council, chaired by Ken Dixon, meets monthly at noon on the first Tuesday of each month to plan a number of promotional projects for the area r ring the year. At this time they are discussing a late spring promotion. The St Boni/MinnetrisUi Professional Business Associates, chaired by Kay Hirsch, meets at noon on the first Wednesday of the month. They have speakers of interest to the area businesses. Their next meeting will have Jim Daniels Of the cable commission as their speaker. Tliey are also planning a beautification project near the comer of Kwy. 7 and Cty. Rd. 92 in St Boni. 'ITie Ambassadors Committee, chaired by Gerry Smith of &O.S. Printing is getting itself organized They will be making welcoming visits within the nexc two monchs. The Business/Education Partnerships Committee, chaired by Mike Looby of Westonka Community Services, with vice chair Pern Cherba of Lakes hore I.ntenors, is developing the two projects they will carry out this yeat These projects are aimed at creating a line of conununicatiof' betv'een the education and business communities PartlcipaMon Li these committee activities is open to everyone intereMed .nd can Wf irranged by calling the chair of the committee or the Westonka A.'-e.'' Chamber office, i welcome your questions, comments, suggestions, recommendations and criticisms. You can reach me by calJ-ng 472-678C. Putting it on^the air , _ t ^ «^<lflHHHSL SHFl WHKU&D3 jw .••..I •* - ;.l ‘'1 aFtHPIw^" ''^-»*jk U Ih ?[r«'. “•* *. evin Duck directed his crew lust Sunday duHng a video shoot In Chanhasscn. Duck is a video producer wito got his start through community television. (l’h<»to by Craig Laaslg) • **♦ ; Studio, training, equipment available through community TV By Matthew ZiaUiik ' " Bitten hard by the home-video bug'’ Want to l)c a '1"V .star"’ Or direct Emmy winning shows? It's a long way from the big time, but local a cress rnmmuni ty television provides a way for residents to create Umir own ‘.elevision programs. Those programs can l)e brofuicast over Channel 21 on lh<* local Triax Cablevision system Fxpjipment, training and st'iilio ,time are provided free by the I.ake Minnetonka Cable iv n munications Commission (LM(XX’), which i.s funiled I , rec*.MV- ing 5 percent of Triax’s revenue Narrow-cast might be a better way to descntie pniv^ramm- Ing, said program coordinator Jim Schindler. Since e<|uipmen( and the tinic is free, programs can be about subjects that don't have a lot of commercial appeal. "You don’t have that constraint of having to sell advertis ing." said Schindler. He teacN's classes in how to use portable video equipment ^nd the studio in Excelsior Community Center "SomelKxiy may liave a topic that s not very lnten*s(ir.g to 'Jfi percent of the fxifiulation.” said l^MC^'C adnunLslrator .Jim I)aniel.s ‘‘Hut the oUier .'i |v'rr* rn rnigM tx* inf(Tesli-! I* I'.sves U.em an opix rtunity to vcik IJi it out. tn fias^s .slorg t.‘ ■* ni'ssage.” 'I'raininB (ak'-i aUnit six wf^ck^- sair! hind ir. culm n i!;: **Somebody may have a topic that*s not very interesting to 95 percent of the population. But the other 5 percent might be interested. It gives them an opportunity to work that out, to pass along that message.t» -- LMCCe administrator Jim Daniels froe and if ymi krvAv your way around e camera, yfxi may not twive to take Lhem "We do proficiency fc'sLs for people who may have t>c'en trairH'<i on other systems.” said Schindler. About .V area restdent.s have learned how to use the erpiipmeri) m die last couple Ilf vearv hi' said Many have lointxJ Uie L.MtXXr.s Video f’pKtiK-ers Ciut*. which meets monthly ' b c a way I can gel crev^-c fnr proj«'f|.s.” s;ud hmdl'T "U •• l:;r. <■ a f■ ''1 1 ' ■ ^ ^ < t • u[i<i Lr. '■ t.>i- < ;■ ' ' ’ •’ «) • Television Oonununity television training led to a new career for K"\ in Duck of Chanhassen, who quit a sales career and took local- access lessons a couple of years ago Now he’s a full-time pro ducer, craeting conunerdals and public-service amouncemmts. "Tliat ’s where I got my start,” Duck said ‘‘I stick with it because I can stay woridng.” Besides tlw Excelsior studio. Duck has worked with local - eccesB studios in Mound and Orono. His most recent project is a music video starring Upper Midwest blues musician Ray Nonim Jr., filmed with community-television equipment and crews. A few regular series also use the Excelsior facility, including 'Tonka R^ort," “Seniors ’ Comer ” and “On the Air With Jer.“. Several cities also cablecast their council meetings on a regular basis. Residents are often interested in what happens at meetings, said Daniels, but don't have die time to attend. ‘•niey’re pretty weO watebed,” he said. “It ’s difficult to determine, but you bear remaito .. Studies show that 25 percent of subscribers watch communi^’ttdevision channels every week, said Schindler. Currently, an average of six hours oH shows are cablecast, sue “tt's expandable," said Daniels. “If the need is thae, we’re o do thatraadbr to do that. For more information. caU 474-5539 , V'y ■.r. V ffi:I 1'; Triax will modify some cable TV bills Some Triax Cablevision TV subscrib ers in the Lake Minnetonka area will see a slight modibcation to their cable TV bills on March 1. Affected communities are those where Triax is regulated by the Lake Minnetonka Cable Communica tions Commissioa “We are including a bill staffer explain ing the changes in March invoices," said Paul Nazarow, regional manager for Tri ax. "These changes merely clarify the bill format" Earlier this year, cable TV bills were changed to identify the franchise fee Tri ax pays to local governments. The fran chise fee, which has always been part of the cost of cable TV, pays for local pro gramming and regulatory services. At the same time, cable rates were increased five percent, primarily due to the rising cost of buying cable TV programming, "These two coincidental changes caused some conftision," said Nazarow. “Therefore, in cooperation with the Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Comi»*'«^ion, we will be including the franv... >ee as part of Uie cable rate rather than showing it as a separat#- lin<» item." THE PIONEER - Monday, Mar -b 2,1992 •i -'pV iik\-fit -n' I',;-# 1 > : .iV James Daniels • James W. Daniels, admin istrator for the Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Com mission, has been elected to the board of directors of the Minnesota Association of Cable Television Administrators (MACTA). Cable Commission Chair Barba a Brancd explained, "The Cable Commission serves as the cable authority for our 14 cities, and the election of Jim Daniels means we will continue to have our voice and needs heard at the state and national regulafory level ” "MACrA has approximately 150 member cities, and I’m very pleased to represent our 14 communities at the state association.’* said Daniels. “This will provide input and direction toward legislation that will impact our cities and citizens in areas such as regulatory authority, cable services, local public programming and the process of franchise renewal." The 14 cities represented are Deephaven, Excelsior, Greenwood, Minnetrista, Minnetonka Beach, Orono, Shorewood. Spring Park, Tonka Bay, Woodland. Medina, SC Bonifacius. ■ Long Lake . and Victoria. ,' J f *4 I, .aDie's .attention Uflf J 1*0 IIOU 56 of implementing S 12. manuaiury cartlagc uu mi. i—i/**- uy oruaiJca.st service, saiu lorn CuoK. senior coun.sel to l/te 5c system or reuaiismission consent, Commerce Committee. wliercby broadcasters and opera- 3^^ Howard Met/enbaum (D-Ohio) successfully ofTcred a tors would negotiate the terms for amendment making clear that nothing in S 12 alters the applicabilit carriage. of federal and state antitrust laws. Interestingly, of the 35 senators amendment from .Sen. Malcolm Wallop (R-Wyo.) calls on tl who voted for an alternative pro- Communicaijons Commi.ssion to study the economic impa Ore.), Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) an Sens. Strom Thurmond (R-S.C.) and Dennis DeConcini ’s (1 John Kerry (D-Mass.), 18 tume amendment expre.sses the sense of Uic Senate that TV ne around and voted for S 12 on ina producers should increase their activity to monitor ar passage. remove offensive sexual material from theu broadcast programmin PAHADE OF AMENDMENTS amendment from Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) expresses tl Senators used the opportunity to 5;^ase of the Senate that cable, TV networks and local stations shou' toss in pet amendments, many of j;rcatc and follow voluntary guidelines to keep commercials depic which may not make it past a jj^g qj. jj^rcats of violence out of family pmgramming hours House-Senate Conference Cora- Another, offered by Wyche Fowler (D-Ga.), empowers cable o| mitlee. In all, 20 arnendments were orators to prohibit programming of sexually explicit or unlawful cot attached to S 12. They pertam to everytnuig other amendments dealing with sexually explicit prograr from sexually explicit programming to e were offered by Sen. Jesse Helms (R-N.C.) carriage of home shopping networks. curvpDiMr rriNiri in' As expected, S 12’s controversial re- HOME SHOPPING CONFLICT transmission consent provisions were ThclongestdcbatcovcranamcndmcnUothcrthantheaitcmau- changed through a set of technical amend- bill, was over home shopping stations merits so superstations (in operation May 1, Sen. Bob Graham (D-Ra.), whose stale is the headquarters f 1991) that are retransmitted by satellite car- Home Shopping Network, offered an amendment that m practi nets or cable operators arc exempt. takes away llexibiUty given to cable operators in an amendment fro Also exempt is the retransmission of net- Sen. John Breaux (D-La.). work programming when it is delivered to Breaux’s amendment doesn ’t force operators to carry home sho an area that would be otherwise unscrved ping stations as part of their mandatory carnage obligauons und the bill. Graham’s states that home shopping stations that meet I FCC’s public-interest obligations arc entitled to must-carry stati By licensing home shopping stations, the FCC has already dett mined that these stations meet public-interest obligations. So taki; into account Graliam’s amendment, operators would then have carry home shopping stations. Sen. Daniel Inouyc (D-Hawaii) offered amendments to give l FCC authority to ensure that retransmission consent doesn ’t ”u reasonably ” raise rates and to encourage the carriage of minority pi gramming. Concerned that anyone with a phone number and address can j infomiaiion on someone clse’s account, Sen. Slade Gorton ( Wash ) offered an amendment that would require operators to gi subscribers personal identification numbers to access accounts a to safeguard their privacy. Gorton also offered one amendment that expands the 1984 Cal Act's rural exemption to let telephone companies automatically bu cable systems in areas where there is a population of 10,000 pco] or less and another to prohibit cities from issuing exclusive fianch lyJEANNlNEAVERSA I jm H ASHINGTON - As IM the spotlight on cable IIV ■ legislation shifts to the II ■■ House, lobbyists on ail IB WK sides of the re-regula- M isue, from cable to broadcast to groups will be reassessing id readjusting their strategies. Just the sheer number of lawmak- S — 43S — lobbyists need to reach i the lower chamber makes for a inning task. That combined with the ouse's different constiiut.icics — picsentatives serve districts, not en- re sates like their Senate colleagues > may pose different political chal- nges. IIm action in the House, though, riB begin in the 2S-member telecom- imkations subcommittee, whose ’udrman. Rep. Edward Markey Mass.), has said he would like to begin „vancing a cable bill in the next month. At this point, it is unclear whether the jkMK wiU seek to move a more moderate ^ bill than S 12 or one just as tough. "No ecisions have been made on a date [for urkup] or on the substance” of the bill, ex- lained Larry Irving, chief counsel to the decJinmunications subcommittee. Irving aid Markey will be ulking to Democrats, lapublicans and Commerce Committee lairman Joh^ Dingcll (D-Mich.) to make Mae decisions. Two bills are pending in the House: one authored by Markey, which is considered iaia harsh than S 12, and another by Reps. Eckait (D-Ohio) and Tun d>- Tcnn.), which is more in line with S 12. Opinions on cable’s fate in the House are ■ised. Some feel cable has better relation- Wm there with individual membeis, and. __. t • ^ Ehe House ’s bills historically have been less I? of lainorty pr^rqmmni ; restrictive than the Senate. • Pmybib rngothf-optioh iiiariiiting ' ' But there are otherobstacles in the House. 1 - ... Republicans, who prefer competitive ap proaches to handling consumers ’ complains »v«r cable rates and service, have largely Mated signing onto peiiding cable legisla- ion ’s. That's not the case in the Senate, where OOP wettt along with S 12. The key for ilarkey is to tiy to fashion a bill that Re- UbUcans can accept. Rep. Rick Boucher (D-Va.) has talked to UtAty tdxMt putting some sort of ieiq>hone any provisions into a bill, but Markey has 01 showed his hand. The Senate-passed S 12 would, among thcr things, allow for rate regulation be yond the basic tier, restrict exclu- SI AWjEllDMttlTS * -i- - ^ •• • hsiribib rngothf-optioh siorkiting • SAfar^ suiaa^ privacy • bpoadsnirdaxamptXM • fraUiibdtefnm issuing nduavefrondibe ^ finnib sparakirs to Remfajs hnehisa fw1nl olW msb jH! cs. Sen. Ttzni Lott ’s (R-Miss.) amcmlmcnl aUows operators to item franchise fees, taxes and other regulatory costs on subscribers’ hh Cable groups have said that 5>cn. Patrick Leahy ’s (D-Vt) amei mcnl could cost the industry millions of dollars in new ^uipme The amendment requires cable operators to provide notice and c tions to consumers regarding the use of converter boxes and rem< controls and to assure compatibility between cable systems and a sumer electronics. ■ # • latfiim operoion to provkk^n^ ammfigQrifaig boxts and ramotKonlrd tbricef^^ • dm operoton fluibily k ofrytog horn dt • •OmPCCfiAi^lbiasyfit^ Tdin may tte fkxib^lBhcl proab ifie KC to deteniiM.' lhi must^cniry status of hotm shopping stations • Requiras operators to notify substrihers about unsoIicitM ^ \ #1 I * •• toquns DBS systwre to Sit ashh 4-7 percent of tostnidi^ ond educottonoi progroimning • flor&sSI^sOBSproyisiom • Riquns dosHi (Optioning nothing to Sl?ahers or resfrim^ - iappfaih^ofonlilnrtl^ .i *• it^ir« the KC to study the economic 'mpoct of S12 ’ the CDoioge of sexuoBy expTirit molcriol w PtG j octtss (honnels ;; *■.• ■ ~ r- ..»«.<* «• I • r: r Battle Lines Shape Up Over House Bill By Vincente Pasdeloup IIsTiif: House Telecommunications Mand Finance Subcommiltee prepares In vole on cable legislation b/ mid-March, the bailie lines are being drawn. In light of a telco drive to make sure any House bill includes an amendment that paves the way for telcos to get into the cable business with as little restric tion as possible. Trygve Myhren. presi dent of the Providence Journal Co., has suggested that the cable industry and broadcasters need to call a truce. In a Feb. 18 speech to the Washington Metro Cable Club, Myhren presented an alternative to retransmission consent. Under his plan, cable systems would pay a "modest" compilers fee represerU- ing 2-2.5 percent of gross revenue from broadcast tiers to a pool that would be di vided among local stations according to llteir ratings. Tlie Providence Journal Co. favors keeping the compulsory license for local signals, gradually eliminaling it for dis- Lnnt signals, and "reasonable" must-carry and channel positioning for local signals. Myhren said. "1 am baffled by the fact that many lo cal broadcasters support retransmission consent," Myhren said. “In the case of network affdiates. their network com pensation will be cut if the local station receives any money for granting re transmission." Syndicators also will take any money paid by cable operators, he added. Myhren said he hasn't discussed his proposal with other members of the Me dia Group, a coalition of companies with interests in cable and broadcast. Tlie Na tional Association of Broadcasters had no comment on Myhren's plan. The U..S Telephone Assot ialion is preparing an amendment to a House ca ble bill that would let telephone comP'i- nies into the cable TV business with few restrictions. The USTI?. askeii two members of ilie subcommittee. Reps. Rick Boucher (D- Va.) and Michael Oxley (ROliin). to in troduce their .amendment on a bipartisan seriously doubt we are going to see rapid approval of telco legislation after the Judiciary Committee hearing this week.” Stephen Effros (irfsiiicnt Community Anlrnna Television Association b.isis. but the representatives haven't giv en final approval Tie telco amendment would include fewer restrictions than a similar bill intro duced by Sen. Conr,i<l Burns (R-Mont ) that's pending before the Senate Commu nications Subcommiltee. according to a telephone industry source. bearing date set The Burns bill would allow all (He- phonf companies, including Boll holding companies, into the business of providing video programming if they build a fiber optics nelwork and gel approval for Iheir plans from the FCC and their slate public utilities commissions. A hearing on the bill has been scheduled FH> 28. -1 seriously doubt we are going to see rapid approval of telco legislation af ter the Judiciary Committee bearing this week.** said Stephen Fffros. presi dent of the Community Antenna Televi- sion Association. A’ a Feb. 19 hearing, the chnirmnn of the Mouse Judiciary Fconornic and Com nicrcial I>aw subcommittee. Rep. Jack Brooks (fvTexas). Innted that be would introduce legislation to limit telco entry into information services. le cable industry's strategy at this point is »o prevent retransmission con sent from being included in the House bill, according to observers. Tlic provi sions currently are in a stand alone bill. Hie elections also will play a large role in the future of any cable legislation, ac cording to Capitol Hill observers. Depending on the source, the threat of a presidential veto may have in- ''reased or lessened after President Bush's showing in the New Hampshire primary. The current political debate fa vors candidates who prefer less, rather than more, government intervention in the business world. Fffros said. One Re publican source said a veto would de pend on what type of bill is finally passed and at what point in the campaign it reaches Bush's desk. Meanwhile, Jeff Chester of Ralph Nader’s Center for Democracy is leading an aggressive press campaign against senators who voted against S. 12 — in particular. Sens. Bob Packwood (R-Ore.) John Kerry (D Mass.). Ted Stevens (R- Alaska) and Tim Wirth (D-Colo.). Chester has said he ’ll do the same thing in the House by targeting Representa tives who receive large contributions from the cable industry ’s political action committees. Supporters of telco entry will get the same treatment, Chester said. I f' i- ■ State Legislatures Fairly r ulet for Cable By RACHEL W. THOMPSON J|B Ithough it's too ear- iy to predict what ■ B the first six months flU cf 1992 hold in s- mTwk tore for cable oper- itors regarding state iegisla- ivc activity, a survey of two loaen stales re/eals a pic- jre of relative calm. That's fortunate, some )bbyists said, because the tdustry has in many stales jcome deeply involved ith telecommunications in- astnicture and deiegulation ksues at public service com missions, a whole new ter- ^rain and one traditionally dominated by the telcos. Also, with the U.S. House of Representatives poised to take up the twin issues of ca- On Cable’s Plate in the States: A Snapshot AtifiniPSC Tcleo Rattes/ California iHfiaaiiactBira Michigan Illinois Rorida Pennsylvania Maine * * * Massachusetts Mo charvoo far Now Jersey ■eMI aertlats Now York New York Ohio Wisconsin Tennessee ^ ^ 0 Soiaica aHirtioer/ # #1 aiita«a raliataa In Ml* Lvflelartare New York Tax0S/Franchls» Fees Wisconsin Rorida » Massachusetts Franclileo Missouri ronearala South Dakota 1 Connecticut Tennessee ? Massachi'jetts Virginia i Wlsvunsln According to Tom Steel, vice president of the New Fngland Cable TV Associ ation, "There is a certain feeling that we have that they’re waiting, to see in the end what kind of powers they do have.*' In the meantime, he said, "the whole debate is shift ing" away from cable service per se, towird technology is sues. "We're real concerned about getting our telecom munications image built up." In the New Jersey legis lature. where dozens of ca ble bills generally circulate during any two-year ses sion, not a single measure has appeared since the new ly Republican-controlled legislature came into ses sion. Wki^X%*Illa"tionTnd c^mpeti cable's grass- 'Tm fainting b«au.se there’s usually roots lobbying efforts will be especially time-con- Jersey Cable TV Association executive director Nan ___;__,1.;- cv Becker.suming this year. In some ca.scs. legislatures are in short sc.ssions fo- i.awmancrs gni i a cused on iipocific issues, generally bodgels and shifi in control, she ,* '^«hich schools; in others, lawmakers are in the second yea, n,canons statute was enwtrf 7' ' » ^,70^?,, -f U1 ___:..I ranet ndau, hills BIT bcioE in- must be now implemented by the state Board of Rcg- cy Becker. Lawmakers got off to a slow start because of the schools; in others, lawmakers are in the second year nications siatuic was of biennial sessions and few new bills are being in- must be now implemented by the state Board of Rcg- troduccd. Commissioners......................................... somc^u^nc^sllon may'^ "’ay also stem from the Washington debate. Lob- ton events to determine how much authority they can bying House men and want to exercise over the industry. atory v^onirni.s.siunci^. But Becker speculated that the lack of cable activ ity may also stem from the Washington debate. Lob bying House members, along with discussions at the State Legislatures L-' K * k'ft Fairly CONTINVED fv.:- BRC will be the focus of NJCTA’s efforts in the near term, she said. In Illinois, a conprehensive telecommunications statute due to sunset at the end of 1991, but extended one more year. win be introduced again after inter-industry discussions, ac cording to Illinois Cable TV Association executive director Gary Maher, but that’s the only cable-related bill there. And in Pwnsylvania, Bell of Pennsylvania is behind a massive telecommunications infrastructure bill that will be introduced shortly, but there's not much other cable-related activity, according to Pennsylvania Cable TV Association qiokesman Bill Cologie. **We expect it will be introduced shortly, and we of course will do everything we can to prevent the phone companies from being aWe to compete with us in an unfair way.” he said. A few sta*«^ dtat have traditionaUy taken an activist statKC toward cable, such as New York, Massachusetts and Con- nectkttt, will again generate lots of biUs, but most of them not new, lobbyists stud. In Massachusetts, for example. Steel said NECTA has counted 13 bills so far — including one measure that sur faces annually to raise franchise fee payments from $1.30 a household to the maximum allowable 5 percent of gross revenues — and expects about 20. In New York, Cable TV Association of New York lobbyist Andy Rossc said the industry is closely monitoring as many I as 40-50 bills, that address issues ranging from labeling of cable-ftady TV sets to a pfx>hibition for charges for second set hookups. * There have also been "some preliminary rumblings” about a sales tax, Rosse said, “but nothing is out there right now.” In fact, association ofTicials said not much new or partic- ulariy worrisome is happening in state legislatures in Ohio, . Texas, Florida, South Dakota. Virginia, New Hampshire, Vetmont and Minnesota. Not surprisingly, they indicated their focus is on their state’s U.S. House delegation and visits to representatives both locally and in ^K^ington. They said they look forward to early direction from the National Cable TV Association concerning a specific strategy, but have already been out dL- cussing the basic isstws, including provisions contained in legislation passed last month by the Senate. Tax issues, however, have not gone away. For example, in a few states where sales or utility tax ex emptions have applied to all or part of a cable bill, those ex- . emptions may be threatened. In Tennessee, the cable association last year managed to clarify cable’s exemption from a sales tax on basic and ex tended basic service. This year, said Tennessee Cable TV As sociation executive director Dan Walter, the legislanjrc is faced with a court challenge to its methods of funding public schools, and may either raise the sales tax half a percentage point or take away all exemptions as a way of resolving the problem. Walter said the exemption is worth about $ 12 mil lion. f uiet for Cable Tennessee cable operators have readied 30-second com mercials and bill stuffers. "We will be prepared to marshal our subscribers to beat that tax on basic," he said. The tax would also be extended to advertising and newsprint In Virginia, cable operators rallied early to kill a measure in the sute senate that would have removed cable’s exemp tion from a sales tax. according to a spokeswoman for the Virginia Cable TV Association. In Missouri, the legislature has considered uJdng away ca ble’s exemption from a 3 percent sales tax. as a mechanism for funding the Missouri Arts Council, according to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Missouri Cable TV Association offi cials could not be reached for comment In Florida, the subjection of cable to a utility tax has also been discussed as a method of raising school funds. The Florida Cable TV Association has touted its educational pro grams around the state and, according to FCTA president Steve Wilkerson. few lawmakers are eager to tax a consumer service ir. this economy. The Texas state Supreme Court has also repeatedly thrown own pians for financing public schools, forcing that state to reconsider its tax policy as well, according to Texas Cable TV Association president Bill Arnold. Cable is already subject to the full sales tax in the state, which generally totals 8.25 percent, he said; a reform in school financing may require a corporate income tax as the state constitution currenily forbids a personal income tax. S 12 Passes 73-18 RUT AITFRNME MEASURE lANDS 35 mS By JEANNINE AVERSA H H H ASHINGTON — B V The cable industry BsBB suffered a blow Iasi ■■ Friday morning Bi when the Senate nissed S 12 in a 73-18 vote and re- tccted a less onerous, stripped- down alternative bill. In the end, the Senate adopted more than a dozen new amend ments to S 12. but key provisions in the bill, notably those covering ate regulation, program access and Mti-discrimination, and rctransmis- Hon consent remained intact. A less onerous alternative pockage that was being peddled by the cable industry, a coalition of Democrats and Republicans and IJk Bush administration was reject ed by the Senate in a 35-54 vote. Broadcasters were rejoicing over their self-proclaimed victory, while cable executives chose to fo cus instead on the silver lining they ■aw in the 35 vole.s the alternative mea.sure attracted. Those 35 volc.s, they concurred, dgnal that lawmakers in the House may be willing to consider a more moderate approach to cable re-reg ulation. But some cable executives pointed fingers of blame, noting IS a ,Ver 0 i I r ' -M-v ' I • f k . * s' that many key M.SO executives were not on the scene doing what they could to drum up more sup port for the allemalivc measure “For the majority of the M.SO executives to be on a boat in the Caribbean jon Home Box Office’s annual junket), shows y«’u how fat this industry has become,” said one MSO executive who did not want to be identified Fingers of blame aside, industry executives agreed that although ca ble had not defeated .S 12. it had gained ground in the battle. "The strength of the substitute means that our mission was ac complished and that we shall live to fight another day.” said James Mooney, president of the National Cable Television As.sociation. Moonev said that while it was unfortunate that the .Senate passed such an “extreme bill," which he called a "strange vision of con sumer protection.” he was more than plea.scd by the .strength of the votes for the substitute — 37 by the N(TA s head count. (Althcnigh 37 senators voted for the substitute, two votes were n<’t counted in the final tallv because they were paired with ottiei .alrscnt senators who voted no.) “This thing has a long way yet to go, including a potential veto, and it’s up to us to redouble our ef- Rate Rebate Bill Will Resurface we* -r ^ H ■ ASHINGTON — A provision that would allow ■lu (he Federal Communicatioitt Cotninission to order mm refunds to cable subscribers of overcharges when rates are deemed “unreasonable ” by the agency will be in cluded in a bill to reauthorize the PCC. • •• * Sen. Howard Metzenbaum (D-Ohio) prepared to offer sudi an ameodnicnt to cable bill S 12 last Thursday. But Metzenbaum said he withdrew the item after learning that Senate communications subcommittee chairman Daniel !n- ouye (D-Hawaii), who oversees PCC leautborizatiooleg- isiation, will .stick the refund provision into the PCC budget bill. f-. f ■ • Under S 12. the PCC has the authprity to regulate rates beyond the basic service tier only if, after having received a complaint from a subscriber, the agency detenmnes the Tate to be “unreasonable." .. ’ The bill leaves it to the PCC to decide what constiunes an unreasonable rate. An FCC budget bill will be offered later tliis year. ■ , 1 ' ‘ ; : forts in the House to sec that the extreme bi does not prevail." Mooney reiterated Cable executives, in general, cchoc Mooney's outUxiV.. Falcon Cable TV chai man Marc Nathanson asserted. "If this b is not changed dramatically m the House . conference committee. White Hou.se sourc have assured me it will definitely be vetoed Nathanson added that "the Bush admini iralion, and I say this to you as a Demoer: understands the shallowness of this bill ai liiat it is not a con.sumer bill." John Hendricks, chairman of The Disco erv Channel, noted that S 12 came out committee w ith a 16-3 vote But of those senators, just 12 voted in favor of S 12' the floor Hendricks said that indicates th cable lobbyists have built at least some m mentum Many cable executives said that if S were to become law. new cable prograi ming services would be its first victi: "Revenues that otherwise would be spent cable programming and customer servi [ improvcmenia instead would be expend on broadcast retransmission fees and reg latory proceedings. ” said Robert Sachs, s nior vice president of corporate and legal. fairs for Continental Cablevision. Meanwhile. Wall Street analysts were i pushing the panic button over the passage S 12. "Thirtv-five votes means that the c 0 jcctivc was met, will signal to the Wh House that a veto of any bill rcsemblinj: 12 could be (sustained)/' said Bear. Stei tt Co analyst Ken Goldman “Any ultim. hill that gets enacted into law this year probably going to be a compromise.'" Rut Bob Schmidt, president of the Wir less Cable Association, w as not reading much into the tea leaves The 35 vole Schmid! says, are not cnocai to the real, fii issues 'I don't believe ilieir srrategy to b '^ter a \'*'hiie Hou^ that has thiratencd a vi of this IcLislatmn iropresse*' me. bccau<^ thinV *iu3fe 204! ov '-r realise thr mils a cnnMjm''r issue ’* S 12 Passes Senate on a 73-18 Vote CONTINUED Not unexpectedly, an ebullient Eddie Fritts, president of the Na tional Association of Broadcasters, issued a statement saying, ‘The Senate has taken a giant leap to ward ensuring the long-term viabil ity of universal free, over-thc-air television. This is a great victory for broadcasters and consumers." Fritts’ remarks echoed com ments made earlier last week by some Senate proponents of S 12 during the debate. They called the alternative package an attempt to gut their bill. The alternative, they said, would do nothing for con sumers or for checking the cable industry's market power. Sen. Howard Metzenbaum (D- Ohio) said the alternative should be called "the Cable Television Monopoly Maintenance Act" Community Antenna Television Association president Steve Effros countered that S 12 is the "Broad casting Bailout Bill of 1992." With Senate action completed, the spot light now turns to the House, which has two major cable le-regulation bills pending con sideration by the telecommunications sub committee. One of the bills, otfered by subcommittee chairman Edward Markey (D-Mass.), is less harsh than S 12. while another, offered by Reps. Dennis Eckart (D-Ohio) and Jim Cooper (D-Tenn.), is more in line witli S 12. Late la.st Friday afternoon. Markey said he intends to schedule a markup of cable leg islation within four to six weeks. Some sources believe the cable industry will try to strike a compromise in the Hou.se. where the re-rcguladon issue has gained less momentum and has failed to pick up widespread support among key Republicans who oversee cormnumcaiions policy. Unless the House were to pass a bill iden tical to the Senate’s (which congressional sources doubt at this point), chances arc that any package passed by the House, whether it was a cable-designed and administration- backed compromise or not. would head into a conference conunittee. The conference committee would work to resolve differences in the two bills, a process, sources say. in which anything c.«r. hapjvn. Each chamber then votes on the cm r-.iiicc’s product AMENDMENTS TO S 12 Interestingly, two of the amendments adopted to S 12 came from the alternative measure. Sen. Slade Gorton ’.s (R-Wash.) amendmenLs would expand the Cable Act's rural exemption waiver so that telephone companies could automatically build cable systems in areas of 10,000 people and pro hibit cities from granting exclusive cable franchises. Other important amendments adopted were ones from Sen. Trent Lott (R-Miss.) that would allow cable operators to itemize franchise fees and other regulatory costs; Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) that would require cable convertor boxes to be mote user-friendly; and Gorton. One Gorton amendment would pro hibit cable operators and programmers from using negative-opdon markedng and another would require operators to assign customers personal identifica- don numbers to access their accounts and safeguard their privacy. Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii) suc cessfully offered amendments that: would give the FCC the authority to make sure that retransmission consent does not lead to “unreasonable" rate increases; and encourage the carriage of minority programming on cable systems. Sen. Jesse Helms (R-N.C.) got through an amendment that would al low cable operators to reject the car riage of sexually explicit programming on Icased-access channels, require op erators to place such programming on a single channel and to block the channel un less a subscriber requests otherwise. Another successful Helms amendment would require cable operators to nodfy sub- scriben when unsolicited X-rated, R-rated and NC-17-raicd movies arc being provided to them free of charge as part of a promodon. Subscribers would be given the right to re quest that the charuiel be blocked. The Senate also adopted an amendment from Sen. John Breaux (D-La.) that doesn ’t force cable operators to carry home shopping stations as part of their must-carry obliga tions under the bill. Sen. Bob Graham (D-Ra.), whose state js the headquarters of Home Shopping Net work, objected to Breaux's amendment. Gra- h.-vn managed to get a provision tacked onto the Breaux amendment to have the FCC de- Icnnine whether home shopping stations arc eligible for must-c.in> sl.iuis ■ imoH I'rogrammers re r 3 iz ny KIM MITCIIKI.I. nislraic*! cnbic pfogrnniiiicfs k liuit week lo<*k lime mil lo as- I sc,ss llie poicniial damage of S 12, llic cable re rcgulalion bill lliey feel will sliflc ll»e conlimi- ing ileveinpmeni of original pro- graniniing, srpiasli cfforls lo slart op new nclworks and Ilircalen llie cxislencc of newer and smaller nclworks siniggling for tlislribu- lion. If rale rrgnlalion Ivcomcs law, program rlevelopmeni and nel- work slarliip cosis will l»c diffi- coll lo pass on lo opcralors. As a resijll, programmers say, llie qnnnlily and «|oalily <»f cable pro- giainmiiig will suffer, while broadcasters improve Ibeir pro gramming with a new. second revenue slreain. While mosi programmers said il is slill loo early lo comprehemi rmc points of the bill and ils minicrons aincmlmenls. as well as lo «lclormiiie llieir long lenn effects, they agreed ibal iimsl-carry. rciransmissimi cirnsent rides ami rinancial interest limitations will also impact their business llie bill insinicis the 1-c.leral roni- iiinnicaiions Conmiission lo set <ip roles dial would prevent r»|>craloi.s from rctpiifing pr«>grammers lo give a fi nancial interest in their service as a euiulilion for carriage. Umler the retransmission roles, bmadcaslers every three years wonli! Ik* given an o|>lion of eluxising cither niniidalnry carriage or negotiating with either cable operator for carriage, “Prom a programmer’s standpoint. •I •*.»»» 1 / '> V-/ / 'r anything lhal dcnecis money from a cable syslem is oncrons.” said l.loyd Werner, sndor vice president of sales and iiiarkeimg for (Ironp W S.ilellile Coinmnnicalions. wliitli mnikeis and disiribnics llie Nashville Netwoik and roimlry Music Television ' ll is b;id for smaller networks such as I'oiinirv Music Television ami even worse bn the networks wc baveiTl even an nonneed " Programmers oslimaled ili.il it can cost from SlOO million to S2M> nnlli.'ii to ianncli a i»ew ad snpjxuled ni*iu«>rk (de|H-ndmg on programming t <>* is) and III.,I it lakes nearly four years beloie the nelw'ork would run in the black Wilbmil ibe support of operator dol lars. II is nearly an imixissible feat 5 /2 WATCH: Pro'^jrarTi', like ihis one ^rorn ten MoTi'or Ck'O'^nel ro* I'coch consumcri if 5 1 2 passes, smaller networks fear. If operators arc forced lo pay »'• Iransmissiim fees and cap rales. ili*’se siip|sirling dollars will disap[>ear from llte cable scene, programiners lie' pMrgr.ammcrs' rmslraiions .tic U iiig fmlber fueled by what they perceive ;e. Iheir m.ibilily lo conliol the events that ilirnsi tin- cable industry to tin- precipice ol le regnlalion W'lnl*- im i.m- wauled 1 > say II lor llie re< *nd. many .igreed privately ibal il is pii m.odv tin- issues ol |>rice/v.dne per ceplion and ( le.loiner service - issues Mver uliicli llicy as pn ciamiiiers have iMHonlfol — ibal will lesiill ill rc reg nl.itioii Wliellier lln» ixTerpiion will widen llie ever growing 'it ln'lween opr'ra ."vf'.p.saM/,/, rAcr: <// CONTINUED pRO^Il'PAQBSl'^ - .. oi-, ion and piDgrvnui^ In the cable Indualry romaini to be aetaniirtca^ "Eiiher It will to i, mijoc idbacli fgnw reUtiooahlp wittv«Jefatori or wc’U all JoinVruii and work i< ouC* Mid the of ♦milato rty taiions at ono Q^t^prk^^Ca roinj Uf b© Interesting to Sto how(wlw,di lidea r©>ct.**.' “ If (bey (opcrato^l wilUng to'r^nsldef theU inMRM evea|light|y. 1(^9^ things oonaildorab|y4Ml(J4in^ otherprogianttngff'.. ■i.i'a’ - i ■ > ■ *y' vjSUU. bri3[9ttq^tor»; wki pfwy 0/ ‘They wan< cablodbb^ themouibf asituadoo^y are lit bdpauio, of liorrendoun buaiheas docUlooa lhay have nladc,'' said John varino. president and CEO of Prime Ticket Network.•‘'WeU.pO ono told them to go Qol and make © deal with the NFL that lost moricy.i No one told Uifcni to go out and make a deal with the OlyirtpKs.thal lost money. Thay'yc made insipid btuiness decisions and ndls^lhojr want the cable intjuslry to b^ them out. You can’t^havc it^boih ways." -1 ., ‘ "i'' , Must-carry is dn« IsstKi that cooocmed e^ectiiivcs si newer and, smaller networks. If operators have lo carry - very broadcast stnlion in a mnrkc(plf|ce, many Wopy lh.1t smaller netwv’rk.s will 1)C di-rplKerl and new networks will bo Unable lo obtain disiribulion. e.Ti ...............................-................ It would do a gf^ dlsservjcc 19 tto oontumer who Is looking Tm a choice ’* said Tbm Mohman,.vkjo president of a/niiate relations for !n.-pinid«'x5ai<IUre Network, Wtlch is afnUatcd wito ^e 750 cable •yatems reaching aboy* ^ million homes. ‘ ‘ "It's going to burden the cable operetors more than they are al ready." said Barbara Bellafiore Sandch,'executive vice president oP Tlw Monitor Channel Sanden rKJted that with channel space already at a premium, hiles calling for must-carry and retransmission fees would squeeze operators so light that they would be unable to ac commodate the distribution needs of new networks. ' Satellite delivered religious networks as well as foreign-language networks oouid to Ip >»P«dy as a result of those rules. jKOgrsmmen fear. ‘This could result In VISN and other low-cost basic cable net works being cut from an operator's lineup," said Bill Airy, president of VISN Network..‘‘m,’ Airy bad an additional concern U operetors are forced to xet i^de a xi peirentage of channel space for carriage of multidcnominationaJ religious networks such as VISN may leg; ,slated out of existence In favor of networks like those owned by sin gle <lcnomination Trinity Broadcasting Network, die naUon ’s single hugest broadcast llcen.se holder, according to Airy. , < , t i ••(>m principal concern is that the federal government is consid- rnnr a.lnr'mK a law that will inenrcl give ptefnrntiil tm.mrni to ..ne v>,. e of fchgious esprrvsion." I.r snid ’'Hint limus fn*e rtpie.s- M 1 n i l l»’ys f(*r ll,c sepirai! 'H of chimb an i st.oc H K ■ W:- Cable Set Back With Reversal in Georgi Access Cr p By RACHEL W. THOMPSON - |M evening an important tower BC court dectskm. the 11 th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that un der the Cable Act a cable company aeeking access to the interior of a muItipleKlweiting unit may not pig- gybndc a private easement. a separate section in the Cable Act which would have en.sured a cable operator's ability to wire an apart ment at a tenant's request. Recalling the 3rd Circuit's lan guage on this point, the panel wrote that rejection of that provision was a strong indication that Congress The decision, in Cob/e Holdings did not intend that cable companies of Georgia Inc. v. McNeil Reed Es- could compel (he owner of a multi unit dwelling to permit them to use the owner ’s private property to pro vide cable service to apartment Isle fknd, is a setback for the cable I TV Indurtry and a victory for prop- ^ erty owners and owners of private eaMeqnttetn8.il is consistent with dwellen." a 1989 decision by the 3rd Circuit According to Or. Court M Appedls in Cable Invest- ; irtenttK MIMky. Frank Lloyd, of the Washington, ^ D.C law linn Mintz. Levin. Cohn. Ferris, Olovaky ft Popeo, P.C, said requuing a "dedicated easem...i in the tech nical. rather than the common law sense, the decision condones some thing else Congress surely did not Intend: different rules for access in it means that provision of the Ca- different states. That is because Me Act that has been quite useful federal law does not address what Ifor franchised cable operators) Is „ aoloi«cr»ii9dUinl1crid(i.Ga>r. ^ gia and Alabama because they have c y«iy strictly defined it." The district court ruling over- constitutes a “dedicated” easement, he said. "From a business standpoint.” said Lloyd, “it means (hat private landlords and SMATV opemlots are turned by the panel, he said, "was going to be able to continue to hold one of the strongest we had ever „p ^3^1^ operators for substanii.V had." Howard Graff, of the New York Qty law firm Baer. Marks ft Up- ham and counsel for the lasing par ty, Cable'Holdings, said his client <—refared to in the rtiling as Smyr na OMe—will ask for a review by the entire court payments in order to get access to private apartment buildings." The cable industry is currently awaiting a decision in a similar case in the 4th Circuit (Virginia) known as Media General Cable v. Sequoy ah Condominium Council. ^ said that Cable Act Sec. 621(aX2). which provides a cable operator ac- V cess "through easements... which ^ have been dedicated for compatible caiTiia^ uses," did not guarantee access to private, nondedkaied easements. Two earlier 1 llh Circuit deci- slons, in Cental Cable Television ' Company v. Adnural's Cove Asso- datesUd. (1988) and Cental Cable Television Company v. Thos. J. White Development Corp. (1990). involved not private easements but easements dedicated by a real estate developer to general ut^ty uses, (he pmelsaid. The court rejected Smyrna Ca ble's contenti on that by granting ac cess to "a telephone company, an ^ electric omipany and a competing video programming services 1 provider, McNeil had 'dedicated' I compatible easements.” ^ • ft ft the wrong direction in cable's view,” said Lloyd, "and if the 4th Circuit jumps aboard you can truly System Tells Customers: 'If You Have Problems, Call Execs at Home’ By Barnett Parker Pew System Managers or executives ■ would invite subscribers to phone them at home with complaints or sugges tions, but (hat’s just what the chairman of the board and the general manager of Buckeye Cablevision Inc. in Toledo. Ohio, have done over the past two years. Three times the system has sent let ters to subscribers, asking them to phone chairman Allan Block and general manag er David Huey at work or at home If cus tomer service problems aren’t resolved through “the norm.al channels of our cus tomer relations department" Block has gotten about 10 calls per let ter at work and a total of four calls at home. Huey has gotten a'bit more than twice that number. Block said. Tltat light volume would back up Buckeye Cabicvi- sion's assertion that it has exceeded the NCTA’s customer service standards for several years. The numbers are also significant, con sidering that Buckeye Cablevision in Toledo has 115,000 subscribers and gets 6(X),000 calls per year. “The purpose is very clear." Block said. “We want to make our subscribers like us. We want to make sure no one can say we’re arrogant We want to be very concerned about our subscribers." System changes The calls, most of which have dealt with specific problems such as network non-duplication complaints, have prompt ed the system to change some of (he ways it docs business. "Top management has found out some valuable things," Block said. "There has been some valuable feedback. If a cus tomer tells a CSR that there is a problem, we hope our CSRs and middle managers will communicate. "But you just can't be sure the infor mation will filter up to a decision-making level." Block was prepared to have his life disrupted for six months when the first letter was sent in June 1990, and he thought he’d have to install an answering machine at home to field all (he calls. But a year and a half later, Block still has no answering machine. ‘I think the reason is because we are doing a good job and because people are respectful," Block said. They aren’t go ing to call me unless they really have a problem." House Takes On ReregulationVbietnte Pasdelouplai HiLR the D ust From Tiif B attle WW ovw Senate bill S.12 settles, the Hwmbere of the House of Representa tives are crafting cable legislation that could appeal to a reregulation-shy Bush administration and a Congress under prissure from industry groups. As soon as the Senate passed S12 bjr a 73-18 margin on Jan. 31. Rep. Ed- awd Marfcey (D-Mass.), chairman of the House Telecommunications and Fi nance Subcommittee, announced his intention to hold a hearing as early as mid-March to mark up a cable bill that could pass the House. In November 1990. the House fttssed a cable Hill on a unanimous voice vote, but its language wa5 signif- kantly different from S.12. Markey reintroduced the bill in 1991 under the number H.R.1303. Other cable bills pending before the subcommittee include: ■ H.R.3380. Introduced by Rep. Dennis Eckart (DOhio) and Rep. Jack WHICH WAY WILL THEY GO? D'csv voted for {hp S 5ut> Bfituir ord fc S 12 ^r.v f/’p our.'f^on /s ’ vvDL/id do in the ownt of n vcUi? (D “<Cv : Kr.’rn (R',ViS | C-n'p.. (RRi; \*r-rjy . {D'^OS' D A'T’o'o .'RN,y ; Lc;t FovvTf ’PG-w'i (R-'fk.) fintc*' ^Npk'ps (ROkla Hatfii'd fROrp) Seymour (R-Calif, JCfford<5 (RVt ) Smip^on (RWyo, JoMriston (DLa.) Specter (RPa.) Fields (R-Texas). It has the same re transmission consent provision as S 12.■ H.R.3.')60. Introduced by Eckart. It is mostly favorable to cities.■ H.R.2546. Introduced by Rep Rick Boucher (D-Va.). It would let telephone companies into the cable television business. The subcommittee leadership’s task in passing a veto-proof bill is complicated. It would be tricky to just add retransmission consent provi sions to the Markey bill because its language tightly ties rate regulation to must-carry. Moving a bill similar to S.12 pre sents another set of problems because Republicans on the subcommittee would oppose it Working with the Re publicans could lead to letting the telephone companies into the debate and further complicate the issues. The United States Telephone Associa tion had a neutral bosition on S. 12. White House lobbyists mei See REREQUUTION on pa^e 2b Here are some provisons In the Senate's reregulation bill S. 12 that wouM most affect daytoday operatJorts at cable systems: ■ Rate regulation: Local franchising authorities can regu late basic rates unless the system Is subject to effective competition according to FCC standards. If fewer th jn 30 percent of subscribers choose basic service, rate', for *he next level of sorvice can be regulated. Any ratn Inat the FCC finds 'unreasonable* can be regulated afte' a subscriber or franchising authority complains about ft ■ Rotranamlaalen consent: The FCC wiil establish regula tions on retransmission consent and ensure that basic rates remain reasonable throughout the process. Every three years, broadcast stations wilt have to choose between being carried for free or negotiating payment for carriage. ■ Muat-oaiTy: Systems with at least 12 channels must carry local commercial stations on up to ona^hlrd of their channel capacity. ■ Customer service: 1 j FCC will establish customer-ser- vlca requirements that can be superseded by local or state regulations. ■ Technical standards: The FCC will set minimum techni cal standards and procedures to file complaints against erators whose signal quality is poor. ■ Negative options: Subscribers can't be charged for a service or equipment they didn't request by name. ■ Premium channel promotions: Operators must gh/« ad vance rwtice to subscribers about any free premium-channel promotions mat Include films rated X, NR-17 or R at least 60 days In adv ice. Those channels aisc must be blocked upon a customer's request. Action Moves To House After S.12 Vote RB'iEQULATION coniu. jed from page 3 the Republican members of the House Teiecommunications and Rnance Sub- wmmittee on Feb, 5 to discuss strate gics. It is too early to talk about a con sensus on what could be done, accord ing to Capitol Hill sources. Some Re- pubUcans, such as Rep. Michael Oxley (R-Ohio). support telco entry. Others, such as rlclds. are in favor of retrans mission consent. "We're still fluid,” said a Republican source. Republican members are caught in the quandary of rejecting cable rereg ulation and wate'niug ''able rates rise or voting for a bill that lncl.:'1e8 re* transmission consent and watchl.'.o cable rates rise, said one Capitol Hill source. Retransmission consent provi sions in a cable bQI take away some of its pro-consumer luster and could maxe it easier for the President to vf .0 it in an election year. Another obstacle may lie in the House Judiciary Committee. Rep. Jack ’ Brooks (D Texas) has said he will seek jurisdiction over any cable bill that Includes retransmission consenL Sen. Dennis DeConcini (D-Arir.), a member of the Senate Judiciary Com mittee, has said he wants to be includ ed in the conference on S.12. Rep. William Hughes (D-NJ ), chairman of the intellectual Property and Judicial Administration Subcommittee, held a fourth inter industry meeting on ca ble ’s compulsory license on Feb. 6. Cable cannot five with a combination of mandatory access to its program ming, retransmission consent and com pulsory license, such as is in S12, said David ^dersen. vice president of pub lic affairs for Cox Cable Communica tions. Cox Cable ’s parent Cox Enter prises, "has not shut its mind on re transmission consent." said Alex Netchvolodoft the company’s vice pres ident ct go\emment affati s, but "we haven ’t seen a workable version yet" Among operators, the t • evalting .mood is frustration, said Rob Stod dard, vice president of communica tions for the Community Antenna Television Association. *A lot of talks are going on among (operating company) executives," said an industry observer, but a strategy has not hero developed. ' - "Sr- Vei7 Personalized Service in St. Paul r ... ; tfM •*.* .n‘i o f !HM‘, cqh: SoMKd.iv tfi* V be used for ; . r .. . i Continental Channel Caters to Subscribers Bjr Matt Stump__________ I MAGINE A Setup in which a subscriber turns I on his TV set and a L SR demonstrates how to hook up a VCR or operate a converter or remote contro!. And it's a private, two-way audio, on-^ way video conveniation. lo boot. irnaf^ne the cable op>eraU)r nsinij such a per sonalizeci video comrnunicctioris link lo help "save* subscribers wfio plan to disconnect or lo help sell subscribers new services. Sound like 1999? Try February 1992 in St. Paul. Minn. Since September. Continental Cablevision of St. Paul, which server 59,000 aistomers in eiKhl communities. Ii.is be^n making video house See ST. PAUL on page 15 SiilPaul System Dedicates a/Video House C 8T. MUL dfUtinuedfivm page I * '.j • V clan make a service call. ^ I.' :{v| *; 4 *With vidco house calls, we can have ' ContiAehtal ii using the phone for the audio hooku0, Uthough the system can send audio down the unscrambled channel. Becau^ ID 59,000 subaaiberS have addressable b<dte0, any subscriber can see the CSR When the home is Indl- 'vidually addressed, '’*■ ^ • The video house call CSR has a self- contained bfflee, with S0edal signs in the backgrouftd for the set She also Is part of the system'^ tdephoAe dnnip, so she 'makes bon-vlded calls W subscribers. .* When compression SiTlves, Coleman sees 20 or more channels that could be : turned over to direct mail businesses that codW frt4rry''VMed with ihdr sales pitches. Jewelers could display mer chandise. And Stockbrokers could sell services ualnit the personalized video in teraction. Then. Colenuul Said, there's the per Bonal side. DoflS Singing telegnims to birthday and Snnlveraary greetings. Coleman tested a birthday wish using a / cartoon figure for a children's birthday t pirty and the children loved it, he said. Titi/’"We hare Jirtt begun to ei^jWt the coo- Of ohAww video phone calls for tele- ;;tfaarkedrtg and euitomer sendee appHca- tiottl'* UM PllD ZedL who maP4«es the . aysterti and bterdinaiM the video house Tcal| prtledi 'We*t< using the video ser- i/ykt to wdeofne WW subscribers, resolve ' tedifikal duSStfodS, add new services and answer Oiisfomers* questions.” ^' •-*• -i ■ ■ •1 ___1- ctlla; One ^.SR's job includes calling ^ /aubsdribers, asking them to turn to,l channel 64, and walking them through/ whatever problems they have - . ! '' That kind of customer service is only ^ ! the dp of the iceberg, aocoeding to RandaH ’ ' Oilenian, district manager for ContinentaJ^ Cablevlaion. When channel capacity ex<>^; panda, Coleman enviskms a hatfdozen orv more channels specifically aet aside for I customer sendee and pereonaUzed sales. • , He also sees the pitMpeds for f ■ Bringing famous figures such as Santa Claus into the home. /j ■ Birthday and anniveraary greetings. ' . ■ New-product demonstr^ona. '"‘■Spedallaed tutoring.* Personalized home shopping op> ' porhinitlet. 9? So6 liolild calls' - The ayatdn has made more than 600,, video house calls since September and "people knre it,” Coleman said.' < • ^ ^ > .1', . *■. Giving curiomers the bppdrhinity to , ,4ee the person they’re talking tP on ptraoe la making a cHtfodl differoned in:i system revenue and bi geneHdilg'pnai-^) tiv6 fedimps Amontf *It la difficult to ten sbnieofieover wil' phone how to hook up a VCR,* Cdlemart 'J said. “Many times we wiU need to sched-; ;• ule an appointment and have I'techdl-^ " it-. If ,8 technician appear on camera to j demonstrate how lo hook up a VCR, or a *hew cable converter box or hOw to use ^their universal remote control." ln4ioiiie tervico ^ 1*1 Although the video link goes one ’ way, "It helps for the custom'*r to be able ^ to sec what the service representative nr technician is talking about,* Coleman ”' aaid. "Often we can clear up a problem without having to Schedule an In-hotre ^ ■ service call without the customer having.', to wait for an appointment" ' " The CSR who deals with video house calls handles business replies, VCR and ^ converter attachments, sales calls and whaievf.' else may warrant the video ap- \ proach. The video house call CSR also wotkd to savedistomers from downgrad-^' Ing, and that has helped increase the sys'* tern’s save rate from 39 percent in Jaa- *iuiry 1991 to 59 pefocflt in January 1992. n**’*The ayatem also has used video ' • house ctifo to.biarket I package of Min- % ,' nesOta Noi^ Stars games on pay-per>J jhelpofviov.jhouse calls. •' s ^‘“ ; The Cdst lo Set up the opeTadoil w4sT; 'minimal Severs] thousand dollars for^ •.the stationary canseri, a modulator and ’ ^rk sUUotL;f jt**'; > -W' ' ‘, •*’ A A ' 4 K' . :' l"-=“ :'. ¥■ rX:^ t: il I:: 1^;rp" i I* ii«-- r ■u Carriage Controversy Hits Stone Wall in Minneapolis By B«mttt Parker nARAGON Cable in Minneapolis has re-r rAiaed to add a fee to its cable bills so the city of Minneapolis can pay for run ning Midirest Sports Channel on its edu cational recess channel That decision spelled the end of an unusual arrangement that the city be gan in November after Paragon and Midwest Sports couldn’t cut their own carriage deal. The two parties have been trying to work out a carriage agreement for two years, bid both seem to have intractable positions: ■ Midwest Sports wants to be carried as a basic networit. ■ Paragon Cable would only offer the network to subscribers on an optional tier or as a premium channel. City councilman Walt Dziedde, who has been championing Midwest Sports’ cause, is ready to *run Paragon Cable out of Minnesota. They don’t deserve to be here.’’ The three largest cities in the state of Minnesota (Bloomington. Minneapolis and SL Paul — all ser^ by Paragon Ca ble) are extremely angry.* Ddeddc said. Their elected officials are madder than hell. I would hate to be a cable company that comes before the councils in any of those three cities.* Regarding the faceoff between Mid west Sports and Paragon Cable, Carol Woid Sindt. who is Minneapolis’ diiector of telecommunicalions, said. *1 don’t see a road around this canyon.* 1^1wmmy For two months, the city carried Mid west Sports on one of its five access chan nels on Paragon Cable. During that time the city sought a way to charge sub scribers and pay Midwest Sports. But the deal ended Feb. 4 when Paragon Cable would hate to be a cable company that comes before the councils In any of those three cities/’ Walt Dziedzic city councilman Minneapolis refused to add a fee to subscribers’ bills that would have gone to the city so it could pay the sports channel. That would be bask cable carriage.* said Debra Cottone. the system’s vice president of programming. "It would be assessing a fee to every customer and forcing it down their throats.’ Insensitivity Dziedzic expressed anger and frustra tion at a Feb. 4 public meeting of the in volved parties. One burr under Dziedzic’s saddle is what he sees as insensitivity on the part of Paragon Cable’s parent. KBI jCOM Inc., based in Houston. *The people in Houston think Min nesota is nothing but a bunch of North erners — they’re going to find out,* Dziedzic said. *l really think they’re just snubbing their nose at the local con sumer. When you have people sitting 1.500 miles away calling the shots, that’s not good.* Cottone. who took the heat from Dziedzic during the public meeting, said the system operates in compliance with franc.bise regulations* adding that she welcomes any Increased scrutiny. During the meeting. Cottone noted that Kevin Cattoor, Midwest Sports’ gen eral manager, said his company wasn’t willing to negotiate for carriage as a non- basic network. That finally confirms publicly the problem we’ve run into in dealing with these people for almost two years,* Cot tone said. *I can’t say that it has ever been a negotiation, 3ret publicly MSC has always said it is willing to negotiate.* While the city sees Paragon Cable as being intractable, the system sees the same in Midwest Sports. “We are held hostage by them be cause in effect they have a monopoly con trol for the next couple of years on Uni versity of Minnesota sports and the (Min nesota) Twins.* Cottone said. Cottone knows some subscribers don't want to pay for Midwest Sports be cause she has more than 35 messages taped to her wall that support the sys tem's position. Tlie one thing that subscribers have made their thoughts known about — louder and clearer than anything else — is that they want more control over their cable bills,* Cottone said. k. r-' - ¥ '■' |r •••: fS- •ff'. ii:'P'' Pf'i' ? p"' fe- *• ,'. (' •• i’‘ : t ;: •••'^ *'j t/'.'' ' i' • .jM 'r/\if' HBO • S3 '35 convortcr - HBO ♦• HB02 HBO » S4 9? tier -- HBO + HB02 ♦ 4 nets Cablevision Industries to Add $4.95 Tiers Tiering, multiplexing plans could be pilot project for other systems By Matt Stump IN What Is Likei.y To Be A pilot project I for other Cablevision Industries sys tems. the MSO’s Columbia. S.C., opera tion will launch two $4.95 tiers, premium multiplexing and two additional pay-per- view channels as part of a rebuild. On April I, subscribers in rebuild ar eas will be able to choose a family-pro graming tier of Court TV. Bravo, Comedy Central and The Disney Channel for $4.95, or a tier of SportSouth. SportsChan- nel America. Sportstracker and Country Musk Television for $4.95. Except for Disney, all of those net works are new launches on the system, which counts 80,000 customers. In addi tion, subscribers will have a premium-lev el multiplex of Home Box Office, Show time and Cinemax. Hal Schlenger. the system's marketing manager, said research showed that cus tomers would prefer the flexibility of hav ing new networics on separate tiers rather than having most of those networks lumped into ^sic service. As a result, sub scribers said they wouldn't mind paying more for service if they had more choices. Basic rate hike April 1 Full basic service for 32 channels is $22.50. On April 1. the price of basic ser vice will rise to $M.95. Four basic chan nels win be added in rebuilt areas. T?.at will include fulMime carriage of American Movie Classics and The Learning Chan nel — they share a channel now — Elec tronic Pre^e Guide and the system's own barker channel that will carry information on all the new packaging schemes. While sports and Disney "are two large drawing cards,” Schlenger said, some Columbia subscribers aren't interested in either, so Cablevision Industries chose to create two tiers. The Disney tier eventual ly may include the Sci-Fi Channel. Sub scribers can get both $4.95 tiers for $6.95. creating a further incentive to purchase. Subscribers who take either of the $4.95 tiers will receive a converter, which will make it easier to sell them premium services. The system expects penetration of the $4.95 tiers to reach 40 percent. A second aspect of the new plan is muh liplexing. (Subscribers don't have to buy either of the $4.95 tiers to purchase pre mium networks.) Fewer than half of the system’s basic homes take pay networks, providing the potential for premium growth. Multiplexing is designed to in crease growth and retain pay units, Schlenger said. IVra screens Because the system traps HBO. there is some complexity to the new premium packaging. Subscribers who only take HBO can get two screens of HBO. but they'll be charged $3.95 for a converter. Converters are included in the cost of the two $4.95 basic-plus tiers, so the pricing is designed to (irompt HBO-only subscribers to take one of the Uers, with the converter included in that price, and then lake HBO. Essentially, subscribers then would get four more channels for $1. In further tier savings, onei)ay subscribers can re ceive both $4.95 tiers and get a remote control for the price of one tier, or $1.95. A basic-only subscriber taking HBO I and HBO II plus both $4.95 tiers would pay $40.95 and gel a remote control. For $39.95. a subscriber can get basic ser vice. both $4.95 tiers, a remote control and two screens xif either Showtime or Cinemax. (Now, subscribers with HBO and Showtime-pay $44.95.) The fop package, for $49.95, comprises three screens of HBO. two scr''*’n5 of Showtime, both tiers and a remote control. The system also will adjust the price of additional outlets. The price for a second outlet will rise from $6 to $7; the charge of $2 each for three or more nutlets will be dropped. The current penetr.ilion for additional outlets Is 40 percent. ■ The number of pay-per-view chan nels will increase from one to three. ■ The system will begin to use Cable Services Group's Cable Control System for billing. By April 1, the rebuild will have passed 20,')00 homes. Plans call for the rebuild to have passed 60,000 homes by the end of this year. The full rebuild past 160.000 homes is scheduled to be done in 1994. \ / You DON'T I / TMiNKTHesUII NVINOlFWe—fwmm HDUSTW N UW0P. / Iiull imip\ vtv soMeoNe ^1 LIM60? HoWUM'%r « • * ■fyT w- ... .• 0 L.._. VI he hour is at hand for Ihe cable industry I to hang tight and present a unified front X io Washington. Gible lobbyists are now working overtime, ivhig the way for when Rep. Edward Markey again? Communication will be strained. Trust already is. Operators too have to be more conscious than ever about the signals they are sending. They must resist the urge to squeeze in just one Tales of Cable’s Boat People & How Loose lips Sink Ships -Mass.), chairman of the House lelecommuni- more double-digit rate hike before final iegisla- .............. . . ___? r_____itions sui^minittee, advances his cable bill in iUGh. untile it's very early in the game, one key ca- ie lobbyist told us last Thursday that cable is sltinf a better reception in the House than it did I the Senate. Hiet's all well and good. But at critical juncture like this, it’s portant to remember that im- jagoes a long way. and cable's 'io is. to say the least, looking a tia tarnished right now. li the end, the proponents of S t managed to create and sustain eimpcanion that the cable in- Mry continues to pillage and lender consumers’ purses while Ihe same time pretending to go ^ with rate re-regulation mea- ■es. That impression was construed, I patt, when the now infamous IBtao from Jim Mooney, president of the Na- Htal Cable Tblevision Association, written to idate his board on the industry ’s strategy, was to The WuMngton Post. Whoever leaked the memo — and odds are It mil started with someone on the NCTA’s di- ise and somedmet firactious 42-member board was either careless, stupid or downright •cherous. The memo got into the hands of radcatfers who more than effectively spun it lieir own gain. B^food the damage already sustained, odds »the memo will wreak even more havoc, but a more insidious sort. How can the NCTA ply craft in an atmosphere in which its leaders re to weigh the impact of every uttered or tion is enacted, as some cable lobbyists fear they will. And, finally, a column about cable’s image would be remiss if it failed to mention “the boat pie." Yes, it’s true; while broadcasters and sundry consumer and labor groups were out in full force lob bying in support of S 12, most of cole’s MSO executives were cruising in the Caribbean on the Seaborne Spirit, guests of Home Box Office. * Several industry observers, in cluding od)le executives, said it looked bad to have so many of the industry ’s key leaders on a parly boat while Rome was burn ing. However, several of the boat people maintain that they did their part on S 12 lobbying. They said they made plenty of ship-to- shore phone calls and had even considered char tering helicc^)tets to get them back to the Belt- way if needed. Maybe they should have hired those choppers. One MSO executive, who was not on the boat, shared an amazing tale with us. Early in the week of the S 12 debate, he met with three senators arui was astounded to hear that they bad never been approached by any ca ble lobbyists. In fact, they said they had “no inkling of cable’s side of the issue." The three senators eventually voted with cable and supported the substitute bill. “But if I hadn’t done it, we wouldn’t have had those three votes." End of tale. ?r ij' T F h' V«. '*:ia! Tone Plan Rings No One's Chimes .-l»Siipil By JEANNINE AVERSA 1A ff ^HINGTON — No one is happy about the ■IM Federal Communications Commission’s so- ■f V called video dial tone proposal. Not c<d)]e, not telephone companies, not bro^asteis. not municipal groups, not local regulators. all have a stake in the outcome of the agency's proposal, which would permit telephone companies to deliver video services without a cable franchise. Roughly 71 entities, mostly telephone companies and a handful of cable outfits, filed comments for the first time on the FCC’s proposal last week. The agency hopes to issue a ruling later this year. In general, the telephone companies, including all seven Baby Dells, called on the rcc to move forward cn a much bolder plan than the agency has proposed. The telcos want the FCC to giv them much more freedom in delivering cable services and to refrain from imposing new layers of regula tion on them in this area. The United States Telephone Asso- ciatio:i said "the commission must define video dial tone to accommo date everything that is not video pro gramming — excluding nothing that is possible under the Cable Act.” To do so. the FCC must modify some of its rules, notably rules that limit teko entry lo a “carrier-user” relationship. Without being allowed to own arid package programming services on their own, the telcos told the FCC, there is hardly any incentive for them to embark on the video dial tone path. Pacific Telesis Group was the most vocal on this point. As a result, the telcos urged the FCC to ask Congre.ss to repeal the 1984 Cable Act’s cross-own ership provision. This provision forbids telcos from owning and programming cable systems inside their service areas. Cable groups criticized the FCC’s plan as vague, smacking of industrial policy aiKl lacking in important details, such as how costs would be allocated, how tar iffed prices for the service would be calculated and how independent cable systems would be protected from anti-competitive acts by telcos. “Although the commission discusses several con ceptual approaches to regulation, it has not presented any concrete stand^»ds for specific comment.” com plained Tele-Communications Inc. The National Cable Television Association argued that the FCC can implement video dial tone without ni-i-r. ait.. making changes in existing cross-ownership prohibi tions. The Community Antenna Television Association said the FCC was engaging in “some questionable le gal gymnastics to develop a rationale supporting its proposal.” lire FCC has said it hopes video dial tone gives tel cos an incentive to build broadband networks. Mean while, both cable companies and telcas are making in vestments in fiber optics. The FCC’s proposal would place cable “in an intolerable regulatory disadvan tage.” said Cablevision Systems Corp. Broadcasters, who oppose telco involvement in pro gramming but .support pcmnilting telcos to transport video signals on a regulated basis, expressed cofKems about how they will fare under a video dial tone mod- cl. The National Association of Broadcasten said cer tain safeguards are needed first to prevent anti-competitive behavior by telephone companies. Those safegua^ might include forbidding telco selection of programs, pro gram marketing and program orien tation. Municipal groups and local reg ulators, which want to .see competi tion to cable develop, said the plan gives them too little a role in over seeing video dial tone facilities, un fairly jumps over the cable franchise process, doesn’t compensate the public for use of its property and is unclear as to the division of state and federal jurisdiction. The National League of Cities, the U.S. Conference of Mayors, the National Association of Teleconunu- nications Officers and Advisers and three other mu nicipal groups urged the FCC to impose on video dial tone providm the same obligations that existing cable operators have, such as customer service requirements and the provision of public access channels. The Motion Picture As.sociation of America offered a unique suggestion: empanel an advisory committee of representatives from the telephone and production coriununities, among others, ibat would make recom mendations to the FCC on the form and substance of video dial tone. The National Telecommunications and Information Administration used the proceeding to renew a call for full telco participation in the cable and programming busine.sscs. The NTIA said the FCC’s proposals are too detailed. ■ J m • . ' . • . *^ .1^- ."s \"Osb o■WJf-.t,-\COUNCIL MEETINGCITY of OROm 2 3 1992 OFUROIVJO MujikipRi OfTkt^ Pbfii OfRce Box 66 &( ‘nstal Ba>. Mlnr^esota 5532.V0066 INSPECTION PROGRAM Enclosed is your 1992 septic system inspection program fee statement. The annual program fee has t sen set at $50.00 and continues to include the cost of periodic inspections as well as general administration of this program. The fee is charged on an annual basis to each rural landowner using an on-site system. Payment is due 45 days from the billing date to avoid the late payment fee of $10.00. Note that the late payment pena 1 ty fi^ $10.00 plus 8% interest if unpaid charges are certified against the 1993 taxes. The annual service fee has been increased this year to meet the comprehensive goals of the program. The septic inspection program provides homeowners with information on the proper use and maintenance of sewage treatment systems with the goal of identifying potential problems or system failures before health or pollution hazards result. Last year alone our full-time inspector noted 56 failing systems and 11 nearly failing systems after inspecting 600 (approximately one-half) of the septic systems in Orono. To maintain and preserve our natural resources now and in the future, we must assure that septic systems are maintained properly and failing systems are repaired promptly. Widespread septic problems can lead to costly City sewer projects and the degradation of the v;onderful rural environment we enjoy. Septic systems will serve Orono for many generations to come if managed wisely. The inspection program includes system inspections/ homeowner education, requirements for repair and maintenance as well as record keeping. All septic systems in Orono are inspected a minimum of once every two years at which time maintenance or repairs may be requested. The City maintains complete records of septic system repairs, maintenance, and design information which is currently being compiled in a computer database fcr easier access and better regulation of failing systems. The back of this sheet contains information about the function and maintenance of septic systems. Building and Zoning Department Staff are always willing and able to assist you with any questions you may have regarding septic systems. Please feel free to call Steve Weckman at 473-7357, Monday through Friday, 8:00 to 4:30. HOW DOBS HT STSTSM WORJC7 8BPTIC XAmCS Raw savage flows Into the septic tank where the solids separate from the liquid. Solids such as soap scum and fat float to the top and form * dcum layer. Heavier solids settle to the bottom where they are partially doeoavosed by bacteria. The non-decomposed solids remain as the bottom sludge layer. The solids which are trapped in the septic tank must be removed by pumping before they build up to a level where they will wash out into the soil treatment system and plug the soil pores. The septic tsnk should bo watertight, corrosion proof, and constructed according to standard criteria. A shallow tank with adequate access is easy to maintain, and c*<|Blces only periodic Inspection and pumping of solids approximately'once every two to throe years. The tank cover or manhole access should be opened when the tank is pusiped out so that baffles can be checked and replaced If necessary, and so that the solids can be effectively broken op and pumped out. Inaptccion Inimt 3 • LUCC£ Outlet DRAnriXLO The septic tank effluent la discharged into i treatment area cornmonly known as e dralnfialde This may consist of rock-lln id tranchasr or In soma cases an elevated filter system or -mound-p distributing the llqcld affluent over a large area. The llqu.d slwly flltera through the soil back into tie water table. Thla action cleanses the effluent of bacteria and notrientsp leaving pure groundwater for your continued use. CMB AMD rKBDXMQ OF TOOR SKPTIC MTSTBi Addltlvee should not be used# since they are of no benefit and some may do great harm. Additives that cause the accumulated sludge or acum in the tank to increase in volume will result in these materials being flushed out into the dralafled# plugging soil pores. Other addltlvee# particularly degreaaera# may be carcinogens (cancer- caualng) or suspected carcinogens that flow directly into the groundwater along with the treated savage. Pon*t deposit coffne grounds# cooking fats and grease, wet-strength towels# disposable diapers# facial tisues# cigarette butts, and similar non- decompoaable materials into the house sewer. These materials will not decompose which may plug sewer pipes and will cause a rapid accumulation of solids in the septic tank. When your septic tank la cleaned# you must remove the manhole cover or the tank cover to facilitate cleaning and to be that all solids have been pumped out. A septic tank cannot be cleaned adequate 1y b^ pumping out 1iquids through ^ 4-inch Inspection pipe. Thi? process usually results in the retraining scum layer plugging the outlet baffle. So be sure that the tank is open when you have It cleaned. At this time* the baffles also can be inspected and replaced if necessary. you must use a garbage disposal, you will need to remove septic tank solids every year or more often. Ground garbage tends to remain suspended and frequently will find its way out of the septic tank and clog the soil treatment system. Each septic system has a limited capacity. When this capacity la reached or exceeded, the system will have problems accepting as much sewage as ycu want to discharge into it. Visible ex’idenco of a system about to reach its limits may be subtler the drainfleld may beco^ne wet and mushyr there may be signs of sewage standing in the tank inspection piper basement drains may slow down noticeably (thla might also indicate merely a clogged pipe between the house and the tanks). When the system approaches its capacity# be extra conservative with your use of water. Each gallon of water that flows into the drain must be treated and disposed. Repair all leaky plumbing fixtures and# if posclble# reduce the amount of water used for bathing# doing laundry# and flushing the toilet. Water softener recharge wastes will not harm septic tank action# but the additional waste must be treated and disposed of by the soil treatment system. If the softener wastewater creates an overload to the sewage system# the wastewater can bo discharged to the ground surface# since it contains no pathogens. The wastewater should be discharged in a location where it does not cause a nuisance or damage valuable vegetation. Laundry wastes on the other hand must be rur into the septic tanks since soap or detergent scums will quickly clog the soil pores# causing failure. Sever go down into a septic tank. The gases present nay poison or asphyxiate yoo. Only trained profeasiooala ehonld enter a septic tank. »*\' S‘':f::- W- ' m^' :S*:vvij>fe'f-'V • ii '. ■-tS'f, ,v ,.' k: V ■em. "vf rs ’ f f"'iS iW--tP P f. i ‘•■:V. ■ -V, COUNCIL MEETINGMINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 278 HELD ON FEBRUARY 24, 1992 The regular meeting of the School Board of Orono Independent School District No. 278 was held on Monday, February 24, 1992. Present: David McKown Don Anderson Peg Swanson Martha Van de Ven Thomas Mich Neal Lawson Absent: James Franklin Board member John Maresh arrived while the meeting was in progress. UPON MOTION by Martha Van de Ven, seconded by Don Anderson, the consent agenda was approved as follows: - approved the minutes of the February 10, 1992 regular meeting; - approved 185 additional hours for the Early Childhood Family Education Coordinator/Teacher for the 1991-92 school year; - approved the appointment of Edith Nelson as a part-time cook at Schumann Elementary, effective February 3, 1992; - approved the bills as covered by vouchers 073074 through 073224 and office checks as covered by vouchers 1767 through 1805. Motion carried. Board member Maresh absent. Dr. Mich reported that the NCA visitation was completed last week and that Connie Fladeland would provide more information later in the meeting; that on February 20 and 21 he had conducted a workshop on the Elements of Effective Instruction and that 90X of the faculty have taken this workshop; that the following people will serve on the high school Principal Search Advisory Committee: Don Anderson, John Maresh, Martha Van de Ven, Neat Lawson, Warren Nelson, Karen Orcutt, Don Laine, Ginto Naujokas and Dave Sohn and that the work of this committee will begin shortly before applications close; that March 2 is School Board Day at the Capitol; that the Orono High School winter band concert will be held on February 25, Schumann Elementary choir concert on March 10 and the middle school choral concert on March 12; that K-8 conferences will be held next week; that Snow Days were held at the high school last week and concluded with the Sadie Hawkins dance; that Mr. Lawson ha^ been in contact with Tony Leung and has begun the process of the land arrangement for use by a community group intending to develop a hockey arena. Each Board member provided a brief update on the progress/direction of their respective long-range planning committees. Dave McKown presented the final report from the Site-Based Decision Making Committee and Dr. Mich responded that when the work of each committee is complete, a steering committee will be devel oped to review these reports and from this committee a series of long-range planning recommendations will be presented to the Board of Education. 3-'-fr"L 1“’T%>V, h& V:k^ ^v"; ' 1#^ fe:^‘ f‘) i. • '.* V i^^'‘ t# ■' l?:V- i%- k" '-: .' '• • 1 ??Kv^;v ' j- - '?!*■» > - -:. Vm i' ‘■^w- MS'. :-- :i?:s-v - *.f/«lVf, « fe%-?CVA ■•: S-kOS PUc i§m^mm-:-r- p"te§-' "m’ -.vff*:-, MM ^iSv»:mii' M-"' is-Wm i>V,V‘.:---' » [•■»:'/{,yS’:^ <V- iSii'Hl - -i-- Neal Lawson provided the Board with a brief sunwary of the process that was followed regarding the recownendation for employee group health benefits and stated that the reconwendation from the insurance committee is to maintain the same two health insurance providers. Mr. Lawson and Sandra Wei land. President of MOL Corporate Benefits, Inc. provided information regarding both providers and answered Questions from the Board for clarification purposes. UPON MOTION Don Anderson, awarded the Employee Group MedCenters per rates bid. seconded Health by John Insurance Maresh, the Board to Medica Primary of Education (Share) and Motion carried. UPON MOTION by Martha Van Education approved the 2000 de Ven, seconded by John Policy series as follows: Maresh, the Board of APPROVED POLICY SERIES ON FILE IN DISTRICT OFFICE ■rt 1 ■1 t_r 1. ■ f M-'.te p-i. pv- • p %:■ ■Mt:- Him- :: - I: l;S.; v’T ' r^ ;:f - - -‘ to. r'-cV-- 5PO. ■ % r: •. - • . i t . '^ ■ . * Pfk’- %. ' ■'. P; ’ i. ■ hf'r.‘^<r te ■ s:p. my/- k '^ ' ^ lB^' fev.m. i;'^' ii" p‘ S;k- &■: IMk .*•« P' kf'- tep, pv-y. (. jk i*-^.p: ij; • ': Vt- Ip- Ifj - liip fel; . 1?^M&-.. ilk-i The Board heard a report from Ms. Connie Fladeland regarding the North Central Accreditation Association Visitation which occurred February 18 - 20, 1992. Ms. Fladeland provided information on the process that is followed in preparation for this visit and stated that programs in the areas of art, business education, science and technology were reviewed. She highlighted the exit report, which was very positive regarding program as well as staff, and stated that the final report which will provide information on program strengths/limitations as well as recommendations for improvement will be ready in about 4 -6 weeks. Or. Mich provided the Board with information on the District's capital needs stating that the development of a five year plan last year brought to the fore many of those needs and that although the facilities have been well maintained, there are areas that need to be improved/updated, there is a sizeable need for an increased expenditure in the area of technology plus an increased need in the area of textbooks, etc. He stated that most of these needs have a strong educational component as well as <^he component of maintaining the quality of the physical plant that the community has provided. He stated that it is his understanding that the Board recognizes these needs as important basic necessi ties for the School District and chat the Boa'^d o' Education fulfills its responsibilities by presenting these needs to its constituents through a bond referendum. Discussion ensued regarding the appropriateness of a bond referendum and the potential times at which a referendum m-ght be attempted. The Board of Education directed administration to continue to examine the capital needs/dollars involved and if their findings remain affirmative for a bond referendum, administration should return a recommendation at the March 9 meeting calling for a bond referendum. Mr. McKown encouraged individual Board members to thoroughly study the information they have received and then contact Dr. Mich or Mr. Lawson and communicate their opinions which will also provide administra tion some direction in this decision. UPON MOTION by John Maresh, seconued by Peg Swanson, the meeting was adjourned. Motion carried. Approved; Don A. Anderson, Vice Chainn<3n // ft V® :■. TOi FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Ron Mcoro<=, City Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director March 17, 1992 Drainage Culvert - New Facility COUNCIL MEETING MAR 13 19": CITY OF ORONO tifij During 'the process of acquiring bids for the new Public Works facility# a drainage culvert was not included in the original cost estimate. Bids for placing the culvert came in very high and staff was directed to pursue an alternative. V,The City forces can place the pipe only for a cost of approximately $5#000.00. ,:V Vy; i. ■ m ■ .< 1 >1 This cost does not include the baffle weir at the inlet to the culvert. I am currently reviewing the feasibility of City forces placing the weir and will submit costs to you at a later date. Because of the schedule we are trying to accommodate, I recommend we proceed with the placing of the culvert immediately. ■ , p.,ch V pp:- m- \ p-_ mmrn iMh fe. - - i .r ^ y. i i Aiii J 1 •■—"V. -” >—**t Wr- -.■,i#; )i^1: i?<!r mi‘- ’j, •■ t w' '•' * 2f->J k.r ’t-: V ';:'?‘-v/i^'' 1 ^ '■-if: ;jfk ^'!.r • ii: ^-■;v^ St ■ fe-- mrf m0 Th/^.JU. ^ O March 17, 1992 mar i 8 1992 TIME IS RUNNING OUT The Public Works Committee of the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners will vote on the Pioneer Trail test project on Thursday, March 26th. We have not won yet. We still do not know how Commissioner Tad Jude will vote on this issue. We are seriously concerned. If you are one of the many people who have called or written to Commissioner Jude to express your support for the project, THANK YOU. If not, there is still time to do so. It doesn't hurt to call or write more than once either. We win be providing bus transportation to the committee meeting in the Hennepin County Government Center on March 26th for those who wish io ride We urge you to plan to attend this important hearing. Only through a show of community support for this project can we demonstrate to the county commissioners that they need not fear for their jobs if they support the combined fly and bottom ash testing. The bus will depart from the Medina Ballroom parking lot, located on Highway 55 in Medina at 8:15 a.m. on the 26th. If you would like to ride, please call Jeff Spartz at 371-0233 at any time of day or night. Jeff's voice mail operates 24 hours per day. We would like j get a preliminary headcount since we might need two buses. A continental breakfast reception will immediately precede the hearing. YOU CAN HELP, by writing or calling. Pa^s this information on to 10 or 20 of your friends and neighbors and ask them to call or write before March 26th. Listed on the next page are some good reasons to support the proposed Hennepin County/MSC Demonstration Project on Pioneer Trail in Corccran. Pick your favorites and then use them in letters and telephone calls to the Commissioner, but try to put them in your own words. (Politicians can usually tell when everybody is saying the same thing, and then tend to discount its importance.) CALL OR WRITE (OR BOTH) Commissioner Tad Jude Hennepin County Board of Commissioners A2400 Government Center 300 South 6th Street Minneapolis, MN 55487 Phone: 348-3084 For more information contact: Judy or Neil Anderson . Sherri or Rodney Blue . Harlys or Howard Schlief Fred Gust in (MSC) . . . 498-8911 478-6592 498-8387 Doris Conzet . . . . . . 498-3192 Marvin Johnson . . . . . 479-2274 Jeff Spartz . . . . . . . 371-0233 . . . . . . . . . . . (404)424-1900 Sp'fei h:*--.- •-V.-V “Sfev: mm-: m Wk :.V•V:p = '-r.v V'i /-^ ■/y"; & ‘■^y. I *' :’^. - ■ T. ■ ,'u »*' •.. -Ei ?t^' ■v::: ':.; :\ \ .•:■■• ■p::'- .1- r-^p-f<-'Am-mm We are pleased that the following city councils have passed resolutions or written letters supporting this effort: Corcoran Greenfield Independence Long Lake Maple Plain Minnetrista Mound Orono Rockford Rogers St. Bonifacius These will be presented to the Board of Commissioners along 'ith the petitions the residents of Pioneer Trail in Corcoran have been circulatirig for signatures. In addition, your elected representatives have been working hard to keep garbage going to the downtown Minneapolis HERC incinerator and out of western Hennepin County. The following state legislators recently wrote to the editors of the local newspapers and the Star Tribune to express their concern that the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners could let the largest investment in county history go down the drain by not taking the lead in exploring new ways of using HERC by-products: Senator Gen Olson, IR - District 43 Senator Betty Adkins, DFL - District 22 Senator Patrick D. McGowan, IR - District 48 Senator Gene Merriam, DFL - District 49 Representative Tony Onnen, IR - District 22B Representative Bill Schreiber, IR - District 48B Representative Steve Smith, IR - District 43A Pioneering Creative Environmental Solutions PICES ■T^:' ■ :•r 'i P^- m:-- '' iiilkife. I V** ^^ t r'-'i-l >;V '■^V'''^ i-^' i-t r» ; ---t W" S''"'-S isvj >.•■»•* -.. -.v f/. vl'^'-- : V * --r - I'■fe'.11 ,k ^■y ■r I Brt ■i;: ?v»-- fel' i^fIpW:m w y'- .’■. i-. ;-,K - i.- •. f;^,' Reasons to Support Ash Demonstration Project l. Landfill Abatement - there will be fewer landfiUs needed for garbage, especially in western Hennepin County, if HERC can continue to operate. 2. Likewise, there wiU be fewer landfills needed for ash, espcciaUy in western Hennepin County, if Lhe ash is permitted to be recycled. If the ash has nowhere to go. HERC may have to shut down, sending mountains of garbage back to landfills. 3. Conserve natural mineral resources by replacing a portion of the rock used in pavement with synthetic aggregate made from ash. 4. Provide a more cost-effective method for Hennepin County to manage its JIERC ash than by disposal of the ash in a landfill- 5 Recycling as many waste streams as possible, including the fly ash portion of the ash, is good * public policy. This is one recycling method that could really work wcU, or at least it should be given the opportunity to be demonstrated. 6. The test wilt not be a good measure of the effectiveness of the MSC process if only bottom ash is used. 7. Using combined ash actuaUy produces a better synthetic aggregate than using bonom ash alone. 8 The 100 tons intended for use in the Demo pr ~t have already been produced usmg both bottom ash and fly ash. The aggregate has bee.*.cd and proven to meet state and federal drinking water standards by an independent environmental testmg laboratory located m me Twin Cities. This is me standard of safety established for this project by me Minnesota PoUution Control Agency. 9. 10. The residents of Pioneer Trail, who are most affected, suppon the project. CaU them and ask. Only a smaU percentage (about 5%) of the ash cannot be processed into aggregate and would require landfill disposal. That's 5.000 tons divided by 365,000 tons of garbage per year, or less man 1% of me original garbage being landfilled, resulting in a bener than 98% reduction through incineration and then utilization of the ash by-product. 11.There are .sufficient safeguards in place to prevent any possibiUty of harm to human hcalth^or me environment. These include laboratory testing, site momtoring during and for years after construction to ensure environmental safety, and plans for removal of me road if necessary. 12.The environmental advocacy groups oppose the beneficial use of ash because it does not fu^.er their political agenda, which is to shut down all municipal solid waste incinerators throughout the U S. With the advanced air poUution control systems now being installed, ash dispose., is me only issue mat can be contested by environmental advocacy groups, and meir last remammg weapon to use to shut down the garbage burners. A safe. environmentaUy-acceptable rnemod of utilizmg me ash will take away their last argument against keeping the HERC waste-to-ener- gy plant open (and require them to find a new way to keep the donations coming in). PLEASE WRITE OR CALL COMMISSIONER JUDE WE NEED YOUR HELP NOW ’ll .V- Westonka Communitf Action Network \[ C^rrf CX\0 .'M <““3 •' UliL^Li=i_I * •EmergencY Assistance "Meals on Wheels "Rerertaii 5600 Lynwood Blvd. Mound. MN 55364 (612)472-0742 SSmCEAREA Greenfield Independence Loretto Maple Plain Minnetonka Beach Minnethsta Mound Rockford Spring Park ;^B^acius Tonka Bay Western Oronc BOANO OF DIRECTORS CrtlQ Antftfton. Mmwnta i St Bon Police Ctaei Mvy OtVinnty« ymlonkM fpoasfi^sf Ccorotnm^ -r.i'' ImOmtk,iMiBufmistrwi JiaimtQiHnat. Pudsc Lz*r in 'iim: CamnwMy Vobmwr UnMmN. Mound Po^vtOM SOieolSoeiolWonttt % Mound CdfCounai VtIHMabura, Wostonka Inloneniien PndoaCoontnoior mnrHufley. MMOrtUAdUlSaji; SMnMon Pmgran Kiinagef Pmnr.GoodSheot'vo UismanChuich ii'i ImmdmnU, Moob-On-WhooltCoofdinauf 1?V Vtlitoemn, Ponnymo CM»ng CoorOfuar Jmy FMrevnkI, :£ V Mt 3m Soo^ Actwrt Commnw UtMrtSeMeNr. Loa/Mbmey Fr.lWMlTagadw, Paobr.OurLodyotdmLaktCtwcn taSenThMiiord. CgnmurMy VoiuMMr CpmnurMy immmt (MWMideMk. Loci^Aatnmn^ MAR 1 h 1S9? March 13, 1992 Mr. Ron Moorse, City Administrator Orono City Hall Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Moorse, It was so nice to meet with you recently rot^arding WeCAN s activities. Thank you too for your help with our ODBC request at the recent public hearing. One of the subjects ue talkeii about was WeCAN's housing programs. Enclosed is the meeting notice for the first meeting of the Task Force (3/23) and background material on the pro.ject. I was thinking that perhaps Councilmember Jabbour may be interested in being Orono's representative to WeCAN" s Community Housing Task Force. At the March 9 th public hearing he seemed to show in interest in housing issues. Should I give him a call? Or did you have some one else in mind? As we also discussed, WeCAN is applying to the U.S. Housing and Urban Development Department for a HOPE 3 Planning Grant. I’ve enclosed information about the HOPE 3 program and the WeCAN grant application. We ask that the City Council pass a resolution of support for our grant application. A suggested resolution is enclosed. We would need a copy of the final resolution by April 15 so we can include it in our application packet. Thank you for your help regarding the important issue of good housing in our community. Sincerely, Kiki Sonnen WeCAN Executive Director enc. .1-i ■i1 ■ 4 f^vr% ft ^ Westonka Community Action Network 'Emetisency Assistance •Meals cm Wheels "Referrals 5600 Lynwoocl Blvd. MiOund. MN 55364 (612) 472-0742 SCRVCSAfCA GreenIMd iiHicpmtence LorflOo Mapi* Plain Minraionka Beach Miiwattista Mound Rockford Spring Park St. B^adus Tonka Bay Weslero Uiono •oanookMECTOiis CfMo Manon. MnotMua m Bon PotcoQuet MaryOaVbMwy. muoimfooo^Ceoionaiof RotMiM Paln4a>Sny«tr. CanmuaartUUiMr TemOaiait, locjl ihttmoyimjn Jeitiuut Cntmn. Wrs;jr»o Putfc Ufjian Sla*tHarp«iiid. Cummu-My Voiutteer JUnHimli. Mound PoIko CM V ^ aSneor&iMrwMrter Mound Oh CouKii ValHtMiMif, Wotoonot kuononoon AoiKrCaortfnMw ■vyHert^r. MotKOmAMBatK BdueumPfognmMantgor Pomr.GoodSMml LudmaoChuKh Ifcm-OhtWmdCwntniiw MMnfmMCMngCoonfnaipr JaiyPMrMwi.UeMSiMt e.V' le Otou Soon Men Caaauhm LeenMomof ft.mMMtoaoM, PootOf.OueloSfoltmLeoeCnuKn CenmftifVMmm MT< LoeolBuOinossmifl MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RH: DATE: COMMUNITY HOUSING PLAN TASK FORCE Kiki Sonnen, WeCAN Director Introductory Meeting ~ March 23, 1992 March 13, 1992 First I would like to thank you for making time to participat* in this project to develop a Community Housing Plan. hell eve it will be both an enjoyable and rewarding o\perienc<*. The first meeting of the Task Force is scheduled for Monday March 23, 1992 at 0.30 p.m. at the WeCAN ot t loe in ' Westonka Community Center. 5600 Lvnw..od Boulevard in Mound Tlicre is a small parking lot at Lynuuod and Commoroe. ^ ou ge toWr'CAN’s office from this parking l-it by going up the into the main building. Our office is the first door on th. right once you enter the b\iilding* The puiposo of this first merting is to introduco otn sc Ives distorts tho project scope and task fo'ee im spuns i b i M t HS , <in determine a tentative meeting schedule. An agenda i attached. I have also included a summary of the Housing Plan, a proposed work plan and timetable, an s ■ information about the Task Force. Any comments or 3^««estion you have on the potential content of the plan or the working of the Task Force are welcome. I apologize for the short meeting notice, but we are a«^xiou to move ahead with this project. If you have any ques i please feel free to call me at 228-3325. Hope to see yo Monday, March 23rd1 David Callistor Charlotte Erickson Donald Loebrick Ron Moorse Patricia Osmonson Ed Shukle :3>- - ■plif pr ■ p’ iS- it' .K;:, P: ■" i:--f:- P- . I;:- i i fei-W‘ V *> ipn A ■' isP, ' i^r, ■ y^iV- •P, Xp,,;' -- tfr:i: fiy. p':;: f fKS agenda COMMUNITY HOUSING PLAN TASK FORCE MEETING Monday, March 23, 1992 6:30 - 8:15 p.m. WeCAN office, 5600 Lynwood Blvd., Mound G: 30 p. m. n Welcome - Margaret. Holste, \>et A.‘. I’t C S 1 ll t M 1 t 6:45 2 )Task Force member introductions 7:00 3)Discussion on Housing Plan proieet; prnimt scope, anticipated product and timeline 7:30 4 )Discussion Housing Task Force: meeting schedule role and 8:00 5)Selection of Task Force chair 8:10 6)Set meeting date and agenda for next meeting Task Force 8:15 7 )Adjourn 1 •fr-; ^ tL. -V*:r Hr,:. p'te'.r.rK rf'' 1.. ‘r;-ft- r; '■■ i.-v*u 4.VI ft :*. 11^. ' ■- ;■ y\'^' -■ -r? ; 7 ■A ft Kft' ft ' • ^ i=“ if' ■|aa '^8I', >- - ^liS. > i. ft f.‘. f.r. t. k<.. ■0' rt'-'-' -rV:ft7? ♦ ** ft ft. ■ t.' ft-: COMMUNITY HOUSING PLAN 3/92 PURPOSE OF PLAN The Communicy Housing Plan project is to identify area housing needs for low and moderate income people, to identify housing resources, and develop ways to bridge the gap between them. GEOGRaPHTC ...EA OF HOUSING PLAN The Community Housing Plan project covers the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) in our area. This includes Mound, Spring Park, Tonka Bay, Orono, Maple Plain and eastern Minnetrista. See enclosed map. PROJECT APPROACH The end product of the Community Housing Plan will be a document, which discusses housing needs and resources and proposes policies and/or programs to bridge the gaps between housing needs and resources. The Housing Plan document would act as a realistic, helpful guide for area cities and organizations in their efforts to provide and encourage affordable housing. The approach to the planning process of the Community Housing Plan would generally include: 1 . 4. • 3. 4 . 6. ▼ t . 8. Identification of major issues and final product Research and preparation of issu' " jiapers Review of issue papers by cities' staff and other in\olvod agencies Revisions of issue papers Distribution of issue papers for public review and coriiment (possibly through a series of public forums) Synthesis of issue pa*'ers, including outside input, into draft plan Cities and public review of draft plan Final plan The issue papers may encompass several related sub-issues. The purpose of the papers is to describe and analyze existing and potential issues; develop a phi1osophy/vision for approaching the issues; and suggest actions to address the issues. The research stage will involve soliciting input from "experts and special interest groups. It is possible that a series of the Task Force meetings will be devoted to focused discussions on major issue areas. Key informants will be invited to formally participate in these meetings. PROJECT TIMELINE AND WORK PLAN -See attached chart r- r c " Si.. H- ir^ i- XI <T* ’—5 3? o er t:::' -r 3Z P' C? \A S I . jX' & W5 f* S' ■o 5 V/1 I i I i 2-.^r* 1^ >5 p'^ <» s: $ V' ^ VA I I i \rv i ■ I I I I I I i I I I NVi nN .7 FEB. 1^9:^. MAR. APR. MAY UWE LV /AU(^. S ept: OC. f\IOY. DEd F£S. MZ Io < o CO u o :i33 O Vjsi r- v" ;■ . & h- ■fn- K I h ,'V 3h;^ kii. raEgAM AFFOroAiLE SilOiyi§!!m PHASE I HASE m--L- VA fe> ^V' by W,' i: ■ m I &. i.;^ 3i -' fei; V #■W' ■ r'.,--.r '<vi.-V;r ,•..- ■'* S*'" . • ♦ - i St:-- ■'jX-''. KVA.:.' ’ .;-'-.c.., Ilr «;V'"-- V ■ V ;^' ■. •■ .V ^ av'T•’*!<. -.. . ;' Kv'.;. .sjV'v; ■'*: . iV' S'" Vv ,* ^-■ A-’ COMMUNITY HOUSING TASK FORCE 3/92 PURPOSE OF THE TASK FOR_CT^. The purpose of the Community Housing Task Force ' * housing planning process and work to ensure the draft i realistic and meaningful for the community. ROl.K OF THE TASK FORCE The Task Force’s role is to guide the planning process and act as a communication link to the community or agency they represent. TASK FORCE MEETING SCHEDULE It is anticipated the Task Force would meet once a month at a time and place convenient to its members. TASK FORCE MEMBERS Task Force members include: liarry Blackstad - Hennepin County planner, Hennepin County Housing £t Redevelopment Authority member Tom Gamble - WeCAN Vice-President, local businessman, resident of Minnetrj sta Jeanne Gelinas - WeCAN Doardroember, local librarian, resident of Spring Park Skip Johnson - Mayor of Mound Karen Walters - low-income resident of Mound E=.9Sowner: a representative of the Mound Public Housing Authority, and another low-incoroe resident. Staffing will be provided bv Kiki Sonnen. WeCAN Executive Director. . ... .i * .’’i km:r *• t ^ V,, ■ > f:\SS;: i^..<. i>.- fpr^ ;tvj' W' ik: kA ■ .• ^a:' tr? ■; = I:-;;. i rl. . • %■: • 3 3- ;::-.vev, J T;' ' i : §A ‘:®3 ;■ ‘4AilPt' flTinnHSTED CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the HOPE 3 Program is a new program by the U.3. Department of Housing and Urban Development aimed to empower many low-income famil l-.s to realize the American dream of homeownersh ip; and WHEREAS, it is in the public benefit to get vacant residential properties, which have been foreclosed or tax-forfeited, back onto the tax roles and available for new homebuyers; and WHEREAS, it is in the public benefit to enhance the sufficiency of low-income families residing in our city and to enable these families to become first time homebuyers; and WHEREAS, Westonka Community Action Network (WeCAN) is applying for a $50,000 HOPE 3 Planning Grant for the purposes of assessing the feasibility of operating a homeownership program for low-income families in this community; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of supports WeCAN’s HOPE 3 Planning Grant applicatjon. b! K .) / y 2 SUMMARY INFORMATION ON WeCAN’S HOPE 3 GRANT APPLICATION HOPE 3 PROGRAM SUMMARY The HOPE 3 Program is a new program by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Dev'elopment aimed to empower many low-income families to realize the American dream of homeownership. HOPE 3 GRANT AMOUNTS Under HOPE 3, HUD awards bctu planning and implementation grants to eligible applicants selected on a competitive basis to aid them in developing and carrying out homeownership programs fr first-time home-buyers through the use of single family properties from eligible Federal, State and local government sources. HOPE 3 funds of $95 million are available for FY 1992 gi'ants with $10 million available for planning grants, and $85 million for implementation grants. Planning grants are limited to $100,000 and acti^ities must be completed within 12 months. HOPE 3 ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS Eligible properties are one to four unit residential held by HUD, VA, RTC, and ta.\-forf e i ted homes. properties Eligible applicants are private nonprofit nrganizitions, cooperative associations, and public agencies in cooperation with a private nonprofit organization. Planning grants arc' available to organizations that are inexperienced in homeownership programs i»nd need financial assistance to determine the feasibility of, and plan for, implementation of a HOPE 3 program. Eligible activities of a HOPE 3 planning grant includes assessing the stock of eligible properties, training of grantees, feasibility studies, identification of counseling/training curricula and sources, planning for eligible economic development activities for homebuyers, administrative costs, and preparing an Implementation Grant application. HOPE 3 TIMELINES Planning grant applications are due to HUD by April 17, 1992. Awards are made January 1, 1993. Planning grant funds must bo expended by December 31, 1993. • « W ♦ 3 / 9 J SUMMARY INFORMATION ON WeCAN’S HOPE 3 GRANT APPLICATION p. 2 WoCAN GRANT APPLICATION SimMARY WeCAN is applying for a $50,000 HOPE 3 Planning Grant for the purposes of assessing the stock of eligible properties, training and technical assistance, feasibility studies, ic.*ntification o counseling/traini ng curricula and sources, planning for eligible economic development activities for homebuyers, administrative costs, and preparing an Implementation Grant application. WeCAN*S HOPE 3 PLANNING GRANT BUDGET WeCAN will apply to use a $50,000 HOPE 3 Planning Grant as follows: $35,000 Housing Program Manager, gross salary Administrati :>n Clerical support Equipment and supplies Training & technical assistance TOTAL 7.500 3,000 3,000 1.500 $50,000 GEOGRAPHIC SCOPE The area WeCAN' is proposing to work in includes the cities of Spring Park, Tonka Bay, Mound, eastern Minnetrista, .and western Orono. PROJ ECT GOALS Planning work goals are the following: f To identify and assess at least 10 eligible properties in this t To^identif/ about 25 potential low-income families who could qualify aj first-time homebuyers under a HOPE 3 Implementation Grant ^ m > To provide training and technical assistance to at least lu WeCAN Boardmembers, Housing Committee members, and other interested community leaders in the formation and management or a nonprofit housing development corporation capable of operating a HOPE 3 Implementation Grant ^ e ■ *. f; * To identify housing support services appropriate lor tirst-time homebuyers, such as financial counseling, home r,= pair and home maintenance education, and job training and self-sufficiency activities „ * To conduct feasibility studies on making specific properties affordable to eligible low-income families * To conduct feasibility studies cn operating a cost-ettective, meaningful homeownership program * To preppre a HOPE 3 Implementation Grant application J ^i-'r *-!.■■« VV."'.r«L**ir<!mm if' Wi- Plfrt'* W Ife .'.V !•.*: ' . W'?: BmmMi Ift, 7%.-: 'M^- irr^:?,?''?'-:,-.•‘('is-. f I;' \ l^ ' '•: ■■ _.. fey-c5 A. ■ ffr.-..- nt.!V ;^ •■ fr '' ' k /» Ll'f' ':!' V f: p.3 3/92 SUMMARY INFORMATION ON WeCAN ’ S HOPE : -l. AN APPLIC/ TION Wc‘CAN CAPAC. / A BYPBRIBNCE WeCAN is community-based nonprofit organ izat . ;;j(^h provides direct human services to low-income families and i*" ividuals in the southwestern communities of Hennepin Count‘d. WeC. operates under a philosophy of the empowerment model, by enhancing low—.ncome peoples’ self-sufficiency by building on the person’s rapacities. WeCAN is currently conducting a joint community planning project for affordable housing, hich identifies housing needs of low- income people, housing resources available to low-income residents, and creates ways to bridge the gap between housing needs and housing resources. Other p»^pgrams and services WeCAN provides include: * Delivery of emergency assistance services to families in need or crisis. * Expansion and improvement of our existing Meals-on—WheeIs program to older adults and the homebound. * Providing financial and budget counseling for low-income residents under contract with the Minnesota Financial Counseling Service. * Providing food and nutrition educational services, which match single-parents with seniors, under contract with the University o^ Minnesota’s Extension Service. » Commiinitv planning for affordable housing. * Providing public assistance intake application services in arrangement with Hennepin County Economic Assistance. * Providing energy and fuel assistance in arrangement with West Hennepir Human Services Planning Board. * Providii. ‘'amily and individual counseling in arrangement with Pyramid Mental Health Center and Relate Counseling Center. f Co-sponsorship of the Westonka Food Shelf and Pennyi* se Clothing Shelf. . * Co-sponsorship of New Beginnings, which provides social outings fer young adults with developmental disabilities. These programs and services benefitted 826 low-income households in 1991 and our projections show that services will benefit 1,041 households in 1992. av:, lai. ^ ■'*f* «•S'' lte»: W. " ' k<&; A^. m0 V, '■'i-Wiv, ‘‘ \j;x.. • S0''' :;i£V- a.<4* •V4. ®W-;fe" W*i.:.1%#'' K'"-fcf Star Tribune Established 1867 Roger Parkinson Potiiist>.‘'i and President Joel R. Kramer Executive Editor Tim J. McGuire Managing Editor Robert J. White Editorial Editor 12A Tuesday /August 21/1990 Healthy skepticism on turning ash to asphalt . . ____t____•____I___:.u rr*#(T!r-il L n#! limiic i<»\vn^nrnnlr Ciir scicnlIs tl safe to pave local roads with incinerator ash? That question should matter to every person who drives Minnesota’s highways or strolls its curb- sides. And until the answer i> plain, drivers and strollers should resist Hennepin County’s enthusi asm for turning ash from its downtown incinerator into asphalt. At this point, the plan to test the idea this year on a county road looks hasty and risky. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) should defer it until public doubts are addressed. meet federal k.nd limits, townspeople cite scientific views that those limits may not be sunicicnl to protect health. /\s the road yields to trafTic and harsh ucalher. they fear, the asphalt could be ground into a lo.xic powder which could contami nate soils and waterways and which playing children might swallow and inhale. • At first glance, the ash-to-asphalt deal looks like a neat way to make tons of incinerator waste disap pear. That bit of magic depends on a Georgia firm. Municipal Services Corp.. that says it can change dangerous ash into innocuous pellets for use in road paving. To prove its ease, the company wants to test the ash-laccd .sphalt on a 1,000-fooi strip of County Rd. 81 ir .,yaylon. The two-year experi ment could be the first step toward paving other county roads — and ultimately, roads all over the state with ash pellets. The MPCA citizen board is scheduled to decide in late September whether to approve a permit for the project. The project ’s dcTci. rs insist that won’t happen, and that extensive tests will assure the experi- mcnl’s safety. I3ui several environmental groups have pointed to holes in the draft permit for the project; It prescribes no tests for measuring the amount and effects of dust that may wear off the road. It lacks a requirement, included in earlier drafts, that a sedimentation basin be built to monitor and contain runoff from the road. And the environmentalists criticize the experimenrs two-year time span — loo short a duration, they say. to determine \* hether the asphalt will hold up safely over time. Those concerns arc cchor 1 by 32^ state legislators, who have urged the MPCA to deny tl.c permit until the flaws arc fixed. All of this has made some of the folks in Davton fretful, and for good reason. They complain that the pellets slated for testing will include fly ash — smokestack residue which often contains hazard ous amounts of lead, cadmium and other heavy metals. Though the asphalt itself is expected to just County Commissioner Jeff Spartz shrugs off resis tance to the D.iyton test as another ease of the “NIMBY " (not in my back yard) syndrome. But Daytonians are right to insist that the lest — in which they will serve as guinea P TS — be both safe -ind thorough. Un*il that demand is met, skepti cism about p.-iving with ash is the best policy. 1 1 j i &» a *'’0.1 312^1 JUPifibui l?«3 HhuE.S 0.^8. nim^ g K•^S^* 37^=5-! 5 9.6 SI 01 Si'3's jg;g^, jifiiii oi^!fili'li s(D O W (D 3 § 0) i I ro *N i 01/14/89 01:15 421 0121,1' I. Ill' j-'-i ■'"4V, I-' ■V' S k- P- m.. ^-v'" h:-- ■ li K*.C-v' L y K>.. |f ImP::<- t, I If 1! pccrpQ.ICS I^JC =AGE 82 July 20, 1990 To the Mayor and City Council of the City of Dayton: Hon. Mayor Corcoran and Coundlmen: Enclosed is a resolution which embodies the recommendation of the Ash Utilization Demonstration Project Task Force, which was appointed by the City Council, following its extensive study of the draft permit and all information available to it at this time. We appreciate the opportunity to advise the Council on this matter, and after thorough discussion and study, we make the following recommendations to the City Council; The application for a p'crmit should be denied at this time, because accurate standards have not been determined for the protection of the health and safety of people and agricultural products, including standards for ash utilization, surface water standards, standards for petroleum testing of TAP-laden asphalt, and transportotion standards fcr ash and TAP. In addition, the application for a permit does not contain adequate Plans for storage of TAP other than the test storage site, for worker safety, for recycling, and for ultimate removal of the TAP-laden asphalt. Further, no bond has been proposed or required to cover removal of the TAP, should it be proven hazardous, or for any consequential damages to landowners and others. The Task Force further recommends that all possible efforts be made to induce the Minnesota State Legislature to Increase fimding for the Minnesota PCA, particidvly in- the area. of^imds^ibr-eidQnssentJWe have~serious^ concerns abcnrt-^ the ability of the PCA to enforce a permit such as this one, should it be issued, particularly if no bond is required of potential applicants. ______ The Task Force further strongly recommends a moratorium on any further applications for a permit for an ash treatment facility until (1) a permit application is made and a permit is drafted and issued which provides for the above concerns; and (2) adequate testing has been completed and all required test results have been released, including a road test of at least seven years in duration. The Task Force further recommends to the City Council of Dayton that it immediately examine its policies for acceptance of rezoning applications and other applications for permits for industrial facilities in the City of Dayton to determine what standards should be met in deiling with hazardous materials and what bond requirements and application fee requirements should be set for all such applicants. It should actively seek the assistance of the League of Minnesota Cities, the r>i:>i m L'rWi tfm mm ':n1 life §■< t$r4.viI lii ii M:®r>-. 01/14/89 01:07 421 0121 protronics Ir.C page: 03 surrounding municipalities, and other Minnesota municipalities which have studied such issues and reached conclusions relating thereto in formulating uniform, non-arbitrary standards to be set by the City of Dayton for future development. It should actively seek citizen input in this connection, including input from the governmental agencies entrusted with the duty of providing for the health and safety of the citizenry and of the industries and businesses already located within the City of Dayton. The Task Force further strongly and enthusiastically recommends that the City and County work more aggressively than they already do to encourage citizen educfltion^ snd citizen p&rticipAtion in recycling, including hazardous waste collection and recycling of plastics. We have been advised that there are programs available tluough Hennepin County which could assist the City in such pro^ams both financially and through programming, and encourage the City to utilize all available resources. In regard to the proposed utilization of incinerator ash, this would help both to reduce the volume and toxicity of the ash produced in the HERC facility, and would have a long-term beneficial effect on the landfill problem as well. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service. ASH UTILIZATION DEMONSTRATION PROJECT TASK FORCE I 'K ta m m- I mMw. m : e•^. t' ’■•y-''5?.‘ % M* / '»< .j^r m I '. ^ y/v- .'v* a fr> i,;W‘ ► ' ■■ NfirV.;.' r-r;-| ; ,V*.''I. '■•«. ■;' P'e *01/14/89 00:50 <121 0121 ppcT=cNi :s i‘‘C p-ge: 04 TASX ?0»CB aiSOlUTION, July 19. 1990 BE IT RESOLVED, that the application for a permit should be denied at this time, because accurate standards have r»oi been dete: mined fcr the protection of the health and safety of people. If, notwithstanding the above, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency decides to issue a permit at this time, the Task Force recommends the following minimum requirements for such a permit: 1. Citizens Review Board. A Citizens Review Board shall be established to review all Plans required by the pern it, all test results, and any changes to the permit or determinations of whether tc sting shall continue or is adequate to allow further use of TAP or construction of a plant to produce TAP. For any significant proposed change to the permit or any Plan required to be submitted pursuant thereto, there shall be a public comment period of not less than thirty days. 2. Length of Testing. Tests shall be devised and standards set tc determine the effect common road chemicals such as road salt, gasoline, oil, and antifreeze have on TAP, d such appropriate tests shall be run periodically (monthly for air, soil, and wa.-F runoff tests) in varying weather and rainfall conditions and analysis thereof shall be part of the final report of the lest results. The testing period should run for a minimum of seven years, or until the TAP has deteriorated to a point where sale road management requires repLcement or repair, whichever is first to occur. The test should not be conducted untU adequate tests are identified and standards are defined to determine the effect of petroleum spills upon the TAP and the long-term deterioration of the TAP pellets. No consideration shall be given to f'lll-scale usage until the entire seven years of the test have nm. 3. Exclusion of Fly Ash. Fly ash should be excluded from the TAP, and all ash, whether fly ash or combined ash, exhibiting characteristics of a hazardous waste should be excluded. There shall be spedfic plans for separation of rejected ash and ongoing testing to assure that no rejected ash finds its way into the test material. If it is not possible to exclude fly ash from the currently-proposed test, a control test shall be run concurrenlly with the proposed lest strip to lest TAP made without fly ash and all the same tests shall be run as for the control strip and the TAP with ash strip. 4. Total Composition Testing. Total composition testing and identification of all chemicals in the ash shall be required, before incorporating the ash into the TAP, before laying the TAP, upon fmal disposition of the TAP, and by periodic core samples throughout the test, and complete records comparing the sets of test results shall be maintained. Alleged test results previously announced by USPCI vary greatly from recent HERC test results. No test of Incinerator ash substantially different in composition from current testing shall be used as precedent in any future permit application for either manufacturing facilities or use of TAP. 5. Toxicity Standards. No TAP shall be used which exceeds the EP toxicity standards set by the federal government. The minimum standard for ft: Ii i- V 4-;- ,1..^ . i'v : i; I IS' H w •r-M ■r fS?-‘fi' ^L' ” *V *^ - f. t 9 . - * »:l-s ■O/;.' t>:R t-"J?**«^ . fr,& i ‘ ,V i; h'-i'- 01/14/89 00:59 421 0121 FPOTPOhJICS I‘jC PAGE- 05 determination of whether a hazard is created upon subsequent testing of the ash and of the TAP shall be based upon the stricter of the public drinking water or private drinking water standards, as to all heavy metals, including lead and cadmium. In addition, a plan shall be developed by the Minnesota PCA, upon final acceptance of the surface water standards currently under ts consideration, to test the wetland areas and surface waters within one mile of th test site at least annually. 6. Highway Employees, Safety Measures. Before the transporting-^-anv bottom ash or the laying of any TAP, all employees who will comeJo-eefrtaCf ’wrth^^ ash or TAP shall be fully advised of any appropriate safety measures to be taken, and those^sahi^ySTand^ds shall be strictly enforced. If tot^ compo.sition testing onhe-aefroTTAP discloses toxicity, such notification shall occur even If leachatM«s^s"3etermine that the ash or the TAP are classified as non- ha2ard9usr"^^Vll residents, commercial owners and employees within two miles of the'^esTsite shall be similarly advi sed Permanent notices shall be posted at the test site visible in each direction advising of the presence of the project and where to obtain further information. The form of such notices shall be submitted to the MPCA and the Citizens Review Board and approved before installarion of any TAP. 7. Core Borings. A minimum of five core borings shall be made along each side of the test site, and shall be deep enough to erisure that at least three feet of clay underlie each site. If at any boring site the clay shall be thinner than three feet, the test site shall be abandoned. 8. Bond, Damages. A bond shall be posted by USPCI in the amount of 120% of the estimated cost of complete removal and safe disposition of the TAP if it were to be proven hazardous. No part thereof shall be released to the company until (a) the project has been terminate and shown not to have caused any uncompensated damage to landowners, tenants, businesses, and residents, and (b) the TAP has been completely removed and properly disposed of or safely recycled. Any land owner required to hold money in escrow following a sale because of the existence of the project shall be allowed to draw upon said bond for such purpose. A landowner, tenant, resident, or business owning any crops, livestock, well, septic system, or other assets damaged or diminished In value by said project shall be compensated for the full value of replacement of said damaged items or reduction in value. Standards shall be set for ill agricultural and dairy products grown or from animals grazing within two miles of the test site, and tei-ts shall be run at the permittee's expense to assure that no toxic materials have been incorporated into those products from the TAP before any sale shall be allowed. Should any residential, commercial, or agricultural land be rendered unusable or unsalable because of contamination from the test demonstratic i project, the owners thereof shall be compensated therefor at current market values. Well ‘resting and other reasonable tests shall be performed, at the expense oI the permittee, for all persons residing or owning businesses within one mile of the test site, if they are requested by such persons, and no n.ore frequently tlian annually for any one person. Should any well test indicate contamination of the water source of such person, exceeding Minnesota toxicity t % 7 • # I-f ^1:?; '5hA'‘ m ■lilt '■f^. ■> vi*' I*# & ii’ ♦ft;-- ,•>» ,# i 0 te‘ IPm V'*\M:1.-^* m 01>'14/89 01:07 421 0121 POCTPCNICS INC crAGE 02 standards for such wells, new water sources shall be identified and provided for such person, at the expense of the permittee. The cost of any expert witness fees required to prove such contamination shall be paid by the permittee, if the ultimate determination is that the well has been contaminated by the project. 9. Transportation Standards. Article V, Section B of the Draft Permit shall be changed to read as follows: Standards shall be set prior to the installarion of any TAP for transportation of all ash and/or TAP from any incinerator and from any storage site to or from the pilot plant in Georgia and to any future treatment plant, including complete containment of all such ash and extreme caution in transferring the same from trucks to storage facilities at such treatment plants. Procediu-es shall be devised to be followed by driver n the case of any accident or spillage, and each driver shall be trained in such procedures. The Minnesota PCA, USPCI, and the Citizens Review Board shall be notified of any such incidents within 48 hours of their occurrence. 10. Removal Plan. A plan shall be formulated prior to the installation of any TAP which will provide for a fast, complete, and effective removal of all TAP from the test site in the event the testing provides information that the presence of the TAP is hazardous, and standards shall be set for identification of interim test results which would require the immeoiate removal of the TAP from the roadway. The Plan shall provide for removal of contaminants from surrounding waterways, soil, buildings, agricultural products, and aquifers, and shall be coordinated with the safety procedures to be utilized by any employees handling the TAP. 11. Ultimate Disposal or Recycling. There shall be Incorporated into the Qosure Plan, Item X, page 12 of the Draft Permit, a Plan for ultimate disposal or recycling, which plan shall be formulated before the TAP has been applied for the ultimate disposal of the TAP, at such time as the road has deteriorated, which include specific proposals for removal, recycling, tracking of hazardous materials, and ultimate procedures for safe landfilling of any hazardous or nonrecydable material. Any material that exhibits characteristics of a hazardous waste shall be disposed of in a manner appropriate for hazardous waste The locations of such facilities, and the total costs of such hazardous waste disposal and handling, shall be part of the Plan. Unless a significant portion of the TAP can be recycled and the ultimate volume and toxicity of material to be deposited In landfills will be less than it would have been had the ash not been incorporated into the TAP, no TAP shall be installed. 12. Moratorium. There shall be a moratorium on plant siting, on any further consideration of applications for permits, and on environmental impact studies or statements until all tests described In the permit are completed and fully analyzed. No large expendihires should be made and no permit application shall be accepted by the MPCA until a determination is made that the utilization of TAP for roadway asphalt is safe and economically feasible, so thit the argument cannot later be made that because a great deal of money has already been spent, a bad project should be completed to avoid waste. 1 h i.. M km.:!.-''f:' ■■ •fe*. 'fe.^1 M|i«- ■i i star Tribune Established 1867 Roger Pnrkinson Pubisst^or ^nd Pfssideot Joel R. Kramer Exocui'vo Editor Tim J. McGuire Managing Ediior Robert J. White Ed ional Editor 12A Tuesday August 21/1990 Healthy skepticism on turning ash to asphalt Is it safe to pave local roads with incinerator ash? That question should matter to every person who drives Minnesota ’s highways or strolls its curb sides. And until the answer is plain, drivers and strollers should resist Hennepin County’s enthusi asm for turning ash from its downtown incinerator into asphalt. At this point, the plan to test the idea this year on a county road looks hasty and risky. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) should defer it ui til public doubts arc addrc'scd. meet federal lend limits, townspeople cite scientific views that those limits may not be sufficient to protect hcnltli. As the road yields to iralTic and harsh wcnihor. they fear, the asphalt could be ground into a toxic powder which could contami nate soils and waierxvays — and which playing children might swallow and inhale. At first glance, the ash-«o-asphalt deal looks like a neat way to make tons of incinerator waste disap pear. That bit of magic depends on a Georgia firm. Municipal Services Corp., that says it can change dangerous ash into innocuous pellets for use in road paving. To prove its ease, the company wants to test the ash-laced asphalt on a 1,000-foot strip of County Rd. 81 in Dayton. The two-year experi ment could be the first step toward paving other county roads — and ultimately, roads all over the Slate —- with ash pellets. The MPCA citizen board is scheduled to decide in late September whether to approve a permit for the project. The project ’s defenders insist that won’t happen, and that extensive tests will assure the experi ment’s safely. But several environmental groups have pointed to holes in the draft permit for the project; It prescribes no tests for measuring the amount and cifects of dust that may wear off the road. It lac a requirement, included in earlier drafts, that a sedimentation basin be built to monitor and contain runoff from the road. And the environmentalists criticize the experiments two->car time span too short a duration, they say, to determine whether the asphalt will hold up safely over time. Those concerns arc echoed by 32 state legislators, who have urged the MPCA to deny the permit until the flaws arc fixed. All of this has made some of the folks in Dayton frotful. and for good reason. They complain that the pellets slated for testing will include fly ash • ^ - ____I_______-..L’ Lsmokestack residue which often contains hazard ous amounts of lead, cadmium and other heavy metals. Though the asphalt itself is expected to ust County Commissioner Jeff Spartz shrugs off resis tance to the Dayton test as another ease of the ".N'lMBV” (not in my back yard) syndrome. But Daytonians arc right to insist that the test — in which (hey '-.,11 serve as guinea pigs — be both safe and thorough Until that demand is met, skepti cism about paving with ash is (he best policy. M h ■ r- D" U'r' Wi' > I'#" ; 5r-^' • fe- 'nm #■ :‘\^: ‘■' C’''-' &:rm. V:-- I' I'ir B- • Ii !«■i- f:te mm 1#^ it tk: pfir Pf ■ I’'-' ir 1^’ ii. h V. :-y i- fcj' P ■fe' ^5 5 <% a trn 09a.2 & o S® 5 C l'S-g3S n3 ’?j = g 5 i 6 - 2.?S=|!| ^ o 1 v> S' 5-E R.o’5 5 .*>■ 2 K = S -^5§a-5«, =»s 5 s- S a q " K" :^gfis& ^ X « »-4v< 3 s afir.|:y o. • R 5- S' /I 1 £ 2 3 S'2.2 32 o r:^ «« A Ji 53'IPK&S3^r. 2.S ° E a s&s^,& Fl!jl c « 3lii^iiHp a n PflfSlI %I|K| ^ i hWil &S o S-S 3 S' 1 a 2.S.3 " 3 l‘jl»8.^ t».'5 a S llgll! oil^ |! illSli °‘Hsnlis=’|;,-® ?E c!f o D ^§=6.0|i 2,?1S A >5 « S'& ■?f S<p IS' f 3I(A 8 < i:: ¥'■0 p:te'p:Ni‘ i-. mm,- S- : ^ t- '5^^' .4«' II' feM: lli^ -' ■ r Tv 0/. T. ■ ■ :• :i: T-v:(m'.•vk: M s KS m0.0 r «'% ■i^M: ^ k'■•t' !(:. V, Jt star Tribune Established 1867 Roger Parkinson Publisher I'^d President Joel R. Kramer Executive Eu..or Tim J. McGuire Managing Editor Roben J. While Editonal Editor 12A Tuesday/August 21/1990 Healthy skepticism on turning ash to asphalt ^ .1 I * . ^ t L»'\*l I r’ltPIs il safe 10 pave local roads wuh incinerator ash? That question should matter to every person wlio drives Minnesota's highways or strolls its curb sides. And until the answer is plain, drivers and strollers should resist Hennepin County’s enthusi asm for turning ash from its downtown incinerator into asphalt. At this point, the plan to test the idea this year on a county road looks hasty and risky. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) should defer it until public doubts are addressed. meet federal Ic.ad limits, townspeople cite seicniinc views that lliose limits may not be sufl'icicnl to protect health. As the road yields to tralTic and harsh leather, they Tea., the asphalt cou’d be ground into a loxie powder v hieh could coniami- naic soils aiu! waterways -- and which playing children might swallow and inhale. • At first glance, the ash-tc-asphalt deal looks like a neat way to make tons of in mcrator waste disap pear. That bit of magic depends on a Georgia firm. Municipal Services Corp.. that says it can change dangerous ash into innocuous pellets for use in road paving. To prove its ease, the company wants to test the ash-laced asphalt on a 1.000-loot strip of County Rd. 81 in Dayton. The two-year exp-ri- ntent could be the first step toward pavi.ng other county roads — and ultimately, roads all over the state — with ash pellets. The MPCx'« citizen board is scheduled to decide in late September wh»'thcr to approve a permit for the project. The projcel’s defenders insist that won’t happen, and that extensive tests will assure the experi- metu’s safety. But several environmental groups have pointed to holes in the draft permit for the project: It prescribes no tests for measuring the antount and clfcc«s of dust that may wear off the road. It lacks a requirement, included in earlier drafts, that a sedimentation basin be built to monitor and contain rui.off fri*r*i the road. And the cnvironincnialists > nlicizc the experiment’s two-year time span — too short a diraiion, they say, to determine whether the asphalt will hold up safely over lime. 1 hose concerns arc cciiocd by 32 state legislators, who hove urged the MPCA to deny the permit un'il the flaws arc fixed. All of this has made some of the folks in Dayton fretful, and fir good reason They complain that the pellets slated for :csiing will include fly ash — smokestack residue which often contains hazard ous amounts of lead, cadmium and other heavy metals. Though the asphalt itself is expected to just County Commissioner Jeff Spartz shrugs off resis tance to the Dayton test as another ease of the ‘‘Nir.ilD '■ (not m my back yard) syndrome. Bui Dayton s arc right to insist that the lest — in which tl.v V w ill serve as guim'u pigs — be both safe and thorougli. Until that demand is met, skepti cism about i>aving with ash ts the best policy. r •TV^;f'4. U- K, H. \>''- I "■-■.■.•■ iv”'- . % ll £fc. I^-. mmw. W' S;' for I ■■C- fe ltr s ?. I-I? <■ /;- ¥■' 0-m-. iL Pi. Sfp. r &■ ..■• 5 na1 & 0 w O. 2 1 o crrt Sg. «” ^“c3«sg-‘^i’ eS- .S-ls-o ? o.™ Hi* 2 « 3 -t-SJu •' o>^ 2$ s « § f 5;Sil|s| “'is!5 « 5.3 ir-^ «B. a.'» '2-2 Hi* |.« al4l?iJfc-2 o.» f» s 5.= a 5?: ^ H ^ K B -.E-g ^-r B- ft R* «S SO-jlT It: Ir (V i 3\5r «-2.^a£ EJ.B 1§ Q. Cl|Na 5l2.s-a 3 sl-lis|'5# ►E.fi S g.'S^s d§:g3 Iff1*1 s: ‘II D8 « llII lip': 9 ll g I B'g R g*li t!i!riii o? a 5 ? ?.: ^ •g 1° 1 P ;iP|!gifili <0 o ■o ■oo (0 (D T3 (D 3 o 3 fi}a 0) (0 ■o <Do sla5 (0 <D 3s0) Cut 4 iitfiifiYi »■-• if n-1 % • h^•1 b}>, i: i s’' I'liii I k-r^* i !.C h 1^., g!;. 92-47.03 Health Risk Assessment of Minnesota MWC Ash Utilization Demonstration Project - Utilization of MWC Ash An Alternative to Landfilling by Thomas M. Jackman, Richard K. Cambotti, and Haia K. Roffman AWD Technologies, Inc. Fenn Center West Building III, Suite 300 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15276 1 i. If.. y*‘,.r i ■'-■■■ . fV • 'l:^- 5 ^■ ;■■ M f I-, W- .:,• ,' •. :':^- v.rfm ;•. .< ':'V t ■r-ktt: P'v t ii. S'- r., V r>'-. V %■ it IMl 92-47.08 HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF MINNESOTA MWC ASH UTILIZATION DEMONSTRATION PROJECT - UTILIZATION OF MW ASH AN ALTERNATIVE TO LANDFILLING by Thomas M. Jackman, Richard K. Cambotti, and Haia K. Roffman, Ph.D. AWD Technologies, Inc. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania ABSTRACT A Health Risk Assessment (HRA) was conducted for the proposed joint Hennepin County/Municipal Services Corporation (MSC) MSW Ash Utilization Demonstration Project, in which combined HERC ash was shipped to the MSC Pilot Plan near Atlanta, Georgia and used in the production of a synthetic aggregate. The synthetic aggregate, or TAP, will serve as a partial replacement for natural aggregates in a section of bituminous pavement that is proposed to be constructed on Pioneer Trail in the City of Corcoran in the spring of 1992. The assessment compares the following three scenarios; A section of roadway paved using the MSC synthetic aggregate product (TAP) as a replacement for 30 percent of the natural aggregates used in bituminous pavement. A section of regular bituminous (asphalt) pavement. A section of unpaved road currently in place at the site. A number of exposure routes were evaluated using acceptable U.S. EPA computer models and some very conservative assumptions. The evaluated exposure routes were; Inhalation of fine particulate roadway materials. Ingestion of groundwater, surface water runoff, and soils contaminated by roadway particles. Dermal Contact with surface water runoff and roadway particles. Food Chain exposure by plants, animals, and fish within a very short distance of the roadway. r- i,*' h' Si.. h i.-'. :• ' r4'. h f ?• J i . ^ 1< |.*V 1 'tr' 92-47.03 This paper describes: The methodology used in this HRA The conservative assumptions applied The results PEER REyZEW This health risk assessment was peer reviewed by Dr. Jan Sykora of the University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health and by Dr. Frank Roethel of the State University of New York. OUTLINE Abstract Peer Review Health Risk Assessment Rationale HRA Methodology Hazard Identification Dose-Response Evaluation Exposure Assessment Risk Characterization Ecological Assessment Methodology Conservative Assumptions Conclusions Uncertainty Analysis References and Bibliography j -L •* - •n4. r **' i*I;' ■ ‘.V }V f r ■h' ■■:i 1^ ■- fr* I ’{ beiiiiitiabi 9 2 - •; ' . 0 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Hennepin County, Minnesota proposes to pave a portion of Pioneer Trail in the City of Corcoran, Minnesota between County Transportation Highway (CTH) 19 and the Corcoran/ Greenfield city limit using a mixture of conventional natural aggregate and a synthetic aggregate produced by Municipal Services Corporation (MSC). MSC is a subsidiary of USPCI and the Union Pacific Corporation. The synthetic aggregate, or treated ash product ("TAP”), is made using combined fly ash and bottom ash from Hennepin County's HERC Waste-to-Energy Facility and a proprietary mixture of other ingredients. The main objective of this Demonstration Project is to demonstrate the environmental safety of this material, as well as its physical roadbuilding properties. The entire 1/2 mile length of Pioneer Trail between CTH 19 and the Corcoran city limit (see Figure 1) will be paved by Hennepin County. A "test section" of approximately 750 feet will contain the TAP. Portions of the balance will serve as experimental control. The Demonstration Project will be conducted under the strict conditions of a permit to be issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The site will be inspected and monitored on a regular basis over a period of 5 years. Samples of the pavement will be analyzed for physical and chemical changes, and samples of the air, soils, and water in the vicinity of the test section will be tested for their chemical composition. HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT (HRA) Rationale Prior to initiating the Demonstration Project, existing laboratory analytical data regarding the chemical composition of TAP, conventional natural aggregate road building material, and unpaved roadway soils as they currently exist were utilized to assess the relative potential health risks and environmental impacts of the following three alternatives: Leaving the existing road unpaved Paving the road with conventional asphalt material using 100 percent natural aggregate Paving the road with asphalt (Test Section) in which 30 percent of the conventional natural aggregate has been replaced with TAP aggregate ' "ji- «•>f y U:^ iyi'-- ■ k:p- k’-" ;T.„ ; ?-.: V ?')j k'. /" # : ,r. rS ¥r ^'tr-n 'P^-r f A i •'> ■m S'-' |4 92-47.03 fp r m- -■ |%i- %tr -fttx [■ •? v.f'\ ;;'^--s P|I' S'-‘. 1 f. ' U *• '.Ar,!f.. ■r^'. ■ r^it ^./ ‘ 92-47.OS The combined ash has been treated to nake the TAP a physically suitable aggregate material and an environmentally safe product. The TAP, as well as natural aggregate and existing roadway soils, were analyzed using standardized procedures that have been approved by the following agencies and scientific organizations: United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 'M^CA) Minnesota Department of Transportation (MN DOT) American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Health RlsX Assessment Methodology Potential health risks and environmental effects associated with the three roadway materials (unpaved roadway soil, natural aggregate paving, and Test Section paving) were evaluated according to U.S. EPA methods and criteria (1989). The human health risk assessment process is composed of four components: Hazard Identification Dose-Response Evaluation Exposure Assessment Risk Characterization The hazard identification (sometimes referred to as contaminant identification and toxicological evaluation; and dose-response evaluation collectively comprise the toxicity assessment. The risk assessment process is completed by integrating the results from the toxicity assessment with the site-specific exposure assessment to yield a complete characterization of risk. Hasard Identification The objective of this component is to screen the informatici^ and analytical data on the contaminants in roadway materials, and to identify those contaminants which present potential adverse effects to the exposed populations. This identification is accomplished through the review of published scientific literature regarding the toxicity of each contaminant. This research may reflect animal and plant toxicity or actual human exposure data. Important factors to be considered in the toxicity evaluation of each chemical include contaminant release, potential routes of exposure, contaminant mobility, types of Hr ■ r !■ ft W ij. rK< V'r*' it'ft' i: .«■•■.i X i.i 92-47.03 toxicological effects (toxicity), and the weight of evidence supporting the validity of data and applicability to human receptors. Generally, those metal contaminants which are regulated in drinking water or hazardous waste regulations, have been studied and their toxicity documented to support the establishment of regulatory limits such as the Ambient Water Quality Criteria (AWQC), Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs), or action levels. These regulatory concentrations are established on the basis of toxicity research data mainly on animals and include generous safety factors for human exposure. For example, an MCL may be set at a fraction of the lowest concentration determined through toxicity studies, to exhibit no observable effects. Dose-Response Evaluation A major component of the risk assessment process is the relationship between the dose of a compound, (amount to whicii a- individual or population is exposed) and the potential for adverse health effects resulting from exposure to that dose. Dose-response relationships provide a means by which pc'irtial public health impacts are evaluated. Contaminants identified in the three roadway materials for which there are established regulatory limits and toxicity data supporting potential health and environmental effects are included in this assessment. These contaminants of concern include the eight SWDA and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals as well as 2378-tetrachlorodizeno-p-dioxin (dioxin). It should be noted that some of the contaminants of concern were not detected in a roadway material. In these instances, concentrations equal to one-half of the analytical detection limit were used in modeling and exposure calculations. This conservative procedure is in conformance with U.S. EPA risk assessment guidance and recommended criteria (U.S. EPA, 1989). A brief summary of the methodology used to establish these parameters follows. This summary includes a discussion of the implications and limitations of the dose-response relationships, and the derived regulatory criteria. • gontaminant Levels (MCLs) - MCLs are enforceable standards promulgated under the Safe Drinking Water Act and are designed for the protection of human health. MCLs are based or. laboratory or epidemiological studies and apply to drinking water supplies consumed by a minimum of 25 persons. 1^:, /■' e®;. ;:•*i: 5^: '-^- V- 92 4 -T “• 4 / . J D They are designed for prevention of human health effects associated with lifetime exposure (70-year lifetime) of an average adult (70 kg) consuming 2 liters of water per day. ivmhi ant Water Quality Criteria (Awoc) - AWQC are nonenforceable regulatory guidelines that are used to identify a contaminant's potential effects on aquatic species. AWQCs are research based minimum surface water concentrations which reflect acute and chronic effects in aquatic species. Rsfarence Dose (RfD) - RfDs were developed by the U.5. EPA for chronic and/or subchronic human exposure to hazardous chemicals and are based solely on the nonca:;cinogenic effects of chemical substances. It is expressed in mg/kg/day and is calculated by dividing the no observable adverse effect level (NOAEL) or the lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL) of a chemical by a series of uncertainty factors a’"d modifying factors. The reference dose can be multiplied by the weight of an adult (70 kg) to obtain an acceptable daily intake (ADI) for an adult. Although the RfD is an acceptable luideline for the evaluation of noncarcinogenic risk, t.ie associated uncertainties in the modification of a particular NOAEL preclude its use in precise risk quantitation. Carcinogenic Slope Factor (C8F) - csFs are applicable for estimating the lifetime probability (assumed 70-year life span) of human receptors contracting cancer as a result of exposure to known or suspected carcinogens. This factor is generally reported in units of kg/day/mg, and is derived through an assumed low-dosage linear relationship and the extrapolation from high to low dose-responses determined from animal studies. The CSF is the upper bound slope of the dose-response curve as determined by the U.S. EPA multistage dose-response model (U.S. EPA, 1987). Exposure Assessment This component of the risk assessment evaluates the potential for human and environmental confact (exposure) with the contaminants identified in the three roadway materials. A complete exposure pathway has four components: (1) a source of chemicals released to the environment; (2) a route of contaminant transport through an environmental media; (3) an exposure or contact point; and (4) the presence of a human or environmental receptor at the exposure point. Exposure pathways, =. r means of contact, with contaminants considered in this assessment include: ] V.,x ‘-k-- 92-47.08 Inhalation - Roadvay materials are subjected to degrading forces such as vehicular traffic and water, which nay generate airborne concr.ntrations of contaminants in the form of particles eroded from the surface. Direct inhalation of these contaminants containing particulates by human receptors is considered. Airborne concentrations are calculated by U.S. EPA air estimation models utilizing local Minnesota meceorological data. Ingestion - Human receptors are potentially exposed through oral ingestion of roadway material constituents; Leached into local groundwater from the pavement. These groundwater concentrations were cetermined utilizing conservative U.S. EPA modeling techniques and data regarding local geology and soil?. In addition, the leaching solution was assumed to be much more aggressive than rain water. Contained in surface water runoff due to precipitation. Conservative assumptions regarding road constituent removal by rainfall were employed in the calculation of surface water runoff constituent concentrations. By direct ingestion of native soils affected by deposition (settling) of the road airborne particulates. Humans come into oral contact with soiled hands, and soil itself in the case of small children. Dermal Contact - Skin contact with contaminated materials (surface water runoff, roadway materials) permits the absorption of some contaminants. This pathway can be especially important in the case of children playing outdoors. Food Chain — Roadway material contaminants in the air and deposited on soils may accumulate in plant and animal tissues through the food chain, and present an ingestion exposure pathway to human receptor through food consumption. Therefore, a food chain model was chosen to evaluate this potential exposure pathway. The model was developed for the U.S. EPA by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory to evaluate human exposure through the terrestrial food chain specifically to municipal waste combustor emission^. The model utilizes ambient air contaminant concentrations (Mg/cu.m) and deposition rates (g/sq.m/yr.) to calculate the amount of a contaminant that has accumulated in plants, -V -:;- .-; 'Mf- te-'- •tA. ■ li-i } •■ ■ i-rV'. v'* ^3'v.. l7- 'Wf. . I •* ■ :> j'fev i'4. k. Y.-;r- 92-47.03 animals, and fish within a given distance from the source over a specified period of time. This contaminant modeling tool is a predictive means of estimating the uptake, bioconcentration, and biomagnification of airborne pollutants through several ecological trophic levels and exposure routes. Ultimately, total human uptake (^g/day) of contaminants is estimated along with the relative contributions of the various exposure routes examined. Figure 2 illustrates the trophic exposure pathways. Three routes of vegetative uptake are considered; Uptake by the plant root system Wet and dry foliar deposition Contaminant vapor phase uptake by the aerial portion of plant This model estimates uptake for animal fe d grain and forage vegetation as well as crops consumed by man. It predicts contaminant concentrations in animal tissue resulting from inhalation and ingestion exposures. Ingestion of animal tissues and crops are both included in the total human exposure. Calculation of aquatic deposition permits evaluation of contaminant uptake by fish and, subsequently, human exposure via ingest:on of contaminated fish flesh. Risk Characterisation The risks to human health are characterized quantitatively. Quantitative risk estimates are generated through the use of Carcinogenic Slope Factors and Reference Doses. The ratio of Dose to Reference Dose is termed a Hazard Quotient and is a measure of the potential health effects of a given exposure. Thus: Hazard Quotient = Dose Reference Dose The hazard quotient is, therefore, simply a comparison between the amount of a chemical to which a person is exposed and an acceptable amoufit (RfD) published by the U.S. ERA. The U.S. EPA (U.S. EPA 1989) explains that a reference dose (RfD) is an "estimate (with uncertainty spanning perhaps an order of magnitude or greater) of a daily exposure level for the human ■oI % i-'h^-, '•rVv;-.- '.-i, ■. '^•/•V^*' **• illv m b'- . ■ *'V ■.*•• 92-47.03 INHALATION A i R 9 C R N E CCN ’AM'SAN : IN H ALA?, ON uptake w •= “AK::E=csi’:CN ANIMAL FEED & FORAGE INGElsTION f ANII TIS! ^AL SUE I : • 'NGES'.CN NGES^CN INGESTION :nge S”:cn TlQZTLt 2 ttSAZtmxL rooo cslxin model 11 r ii.yjJ'’ ¥ t" V: v{\- >■:— •i-0.ir :•■ r ' ti?. I""m t I? ir-' i:t" f'% I f’ I: lp;t' »■ f> :«. * » 92-47.03 population, including sensitive subpopulations, that is likely to be without an appreciable risk of deleterious effects". The RfD is derived from human data, if available, or animal data and represents "the highest level tested at which no adverse affects . . . were demonstrated". It should be emphasized that the RfD is a level at which no health effects have been shown, even to more sensitive members of a population. leve 1"The noncancer hazard quotient assumes that there is a of exposure (i.e., RfD) below which it is unlikely for even sensitive populations to experience adverse health effects" (U.S. EPA, 1989). The hazard quotient is a measure used to describe the potential for noncarcinogenic effects to occur in an individual, but it does not express the probability of an effect occurring. The following example explains the approach of evaluating noncarcinogenic risks. Assume that the U.S. EPA declares that the highest no effect-level (RfD) for a certain compound is 5 milligrams per day. Assume further that site data indicate that a person is exposed to 2 milligrams of this compound per day. The ratio of the site specific amount and the U.S. EPA's published value is 2/5 or 0.4, which is less than 1, where 1 is the level that adverse effects mav begin to appear. According to U.S. EPA guidelines (U.S. EPA, 1989), if the Hazard Quotient is greater than unity (1), "there may be concern for potential health effects". It is therefore desirable that: Hazard Quotient < 1 To assess the overall potential for noncarcinogenic effects when there is more than one chemical of concern, individual Hazard Quotients for a given exposure situation are summed to provide a Hazard Index (U.S. EPA, 1989). Hazard Index = ^ Hazard Quotients As with the Hazard Quotient, when the Hazard Index is lower than 1, there should be no impact and therefore it is desirable that Hazard Index < 1 Carcinogenic risks are computed similarly to the noncarcinogenic risks by multiplying the doses with the CSFs. Therefore, Carcinogenic Risk = Dose x CSF 12 I r t- [ F- tF ■ W '^Ar':. i- ■ ■- I* •;;'■ ■■ i_y - :F^' Ffr it, ■ >1^?I" ■V' . I ; :: ¥■ '■ I!'i‘’X< . &If'1^'. i' rk:l> h«^" :h ■r ‘ '-■ ■ ,5. , :•■■ . ,*:• t.> 92-47.08 The U.S. EPA does not use a single number as the criterion, but rather a range. The U.S. E?A states that its general goal ranges from 10“* to in 10,000,000). -7 (1 excess case of cancer in 10,000 to 1 ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY The potential ecological effects of the three roadway materials were evaluated by comparing available wildlife contaminant exposure data (Ambient Water Quality Criteria) to the total roadway material contaminants in a theoretical pond located 10 meters from the Demonstration Project Site. AWQC are nonenforceable regulatory guidelines that may be used for identifying research-based minimum surface water concentration^ which reflect acute and chronic effects in aquatic species. The evaluation considered contaminant input from roadway surface water runoff and deposition of airborne particulate contaminants into a fixed volume of pond water. The following factors contributed to this evaluation; • Terrestrial food chain evaluation of pond water contaminant concentrations due to deposition of airborne contaminants in the pond watershed for 20 years. • Surface water runoff from the roadway materials removing the total mass of leachable contaminants from the entire roadway material volume (2 in x 750 ft x 24 ft) and depositing it in the pond. • The pond water volume was considered static. In other words, flow through the pond which would dilute contaminant concentrations was no» considered. CONSERVATIVE ASSUMPTIONS USED IN THE RISK ASSESSMENT Air emissions and surface water and groundwater discharges are assumed to concentrate in an area of 10 meters (32.8 feet) surrounding the experimental stretch of road (24 feet x 750 feet), as shown in Figure 3. The ecological effects are also assumed to be concentrated in this relatively small area surrounding the experimental stretch of road. Particulate Emissions and Dispersion Calculation Standard methods provided by the U.S. EPA (1985) were employed to estimate particulate emissions (dust) from the roadway materials due to vehicular traffic and weather erosion. 1 3 S’ *■s^.r- ?' i- hW: &>:;■ p>?t ;i;y. u&m-r ^i^‘. f ^f’ ■ U: y:*'-i;i- b' ■ Plu ■p W 1^ i i.f ii' p W t ■ ■ .•■Vj..,, i .^'>V;:--„ ,;*rL;. . .- .. .v.' ■♦V. <!< 'k;-. % ^ ■:^: ■ h',“- ■■ 92-47 . C'8 These calculations along with subsequent dispersion modeling of the air concentrations of dust included the following assumptions: Emission rates (g/s) paved/unpaved sources are assumed to occur continuously throughout the year. Therefore, concentration and deposition values represent continuous emissions. The particulate emission rate is based in part on the volume of vehicular traffic which was evaluated by the Hennepin County Transportation Planning Division in April 1991 to be 325 vehicles/day. This number was assumed to be the average annual daily traffic volume which is constant throughout the year, even during winter months. Reduction of particulate emissions due to wet road surface conditions and snow cover are not considered. The 10 meter receptor is within distance recommended by air quality model to provide conservatism. Highest concentration resultant from the five most recent years of meteorological data were reported. Regulatory default mode of ISC tends to maximize resultant concentrations. Conservative Health Risk Assumptions The main assumptions made in this assessment are: A person spends 24 hours per day outdoors. A person is exposed 24 hours a day, 365 days a year for 70 years only at this stretch of the road and always outdoors. Infants are exposed 24 hours per day, 365 days a year for 3 years, and they spend all this time outdoors. The inhaled particulates contain the same chemical concentrations for the 70 year period. The entire amount of chemicals contained in the inhaled particles are absorbed by the body. All of the chromium inhaled is in its most toxic form. Chromium VI. . . 92-47.08 • Individuals live within 33 feet of the road their entire life • Individuals consume their daily liquid consumptions only of the study area (within 33 feet from Demonstration Project) • Individual consume food products grown and raised within 33 feet of the Demonstration Project. • Leachates entering the groundwater are not what rainwater or stormwater would leach from the road materials, but rather leachates produced by the TCLP extraction procedure. It is well documented that the TCLP extraction procedure, which uses acetic acid, is much more aggressive than rain or stormwater. Food Chain Modeling of Contaminants 'ffi: W: ifct' y- •' I- ■ ;|k- r s.. €'k 1^I: .pi- • 1^' ■ The Terrestrial Food Chain Model (TFCM) requires various input data to estimate the accumulation of contaminants in plant animal and fish tissues, and calculate a human daily exposure based on consumption. If site specific or regional Minnesota data were not available, model input values were chosen which tended to overestimate accumulation and exposure. Some of these conservative assumptions include: • All environmental matrices (plant, animal, fish, human tissues) considered by the model were assumed to be located at the point of highest air concentration and deposition of contaminants from the source (10 meters). This means that all crops, animal feed, animals, the pond containing fish, and human receptors were simultaneously located at the same maximum contaminant concentration point. • Contaminant air concentrations and deposition rates used were based on total suspended particulate (TSP) concentrations rather than the lower concentrations for the respirable PM-IO particle sizes. • A total deposition time period of 20 years was considered. Food chain trophic levels are exposed to environmental matrices containing constituent concentrations equivalent to 20 years of accumulation (deposition, uptake, retention). • Input parameters affecting the final concentrations of contaminants in environmental matrices were consistent for the three scenarios considered in the modeling of each constituent. 'M'’ i» ’ • 4.5 Vr’- ,' K '.i . h/ •:*■ " . - '-r ‘V- - • 5'}’. y?.; ).f;- A ‘i. w 1^. fe It.^v-- ■m\ s4S'.j 92-47.OS constituents deposited on soils were assumed to be deposited within only a depth of 2 centimeters beneath the surface, providing the highest possible relative concentration (this assumption is only valid for the food chain model and not for purposes of leaching to groundwater). since none of the contaminants are significantly volatile, and soil organic carbon content of 1 percent was used in the model, minimal soil losses of contaminants due to leaching and volatilization were assumed. Additionally, it was assumed that the total contaminant concentrations in soil were bioavailable. Contaminant biotransfer (BTF) and bioconcentration factors (BCF) were obtained from the published literature (U.S. EPA, 1980, 1985; ATSDR, 1988) for specific matrices and constituents, when available, or derived from related chemical and matrix data. For example, predominant metal species solubilities, partition coefficients, and other environmental fate data were used in the derivation of BTFs and BCFs (Lym? , 1982; Dragun, 1988; Verschueren, 1983; Bowen, 1966). Contaminant concentrations used in the assessment were assumed to reflect the most toxic and environmentally critical species of each constituent. For example, total chrome amounts were assumed to be 100 percent hexavalent chrome, the more toxic valence state of the metal (Sax, 1989). Generous human food consumption rates were assumed, following current U.S. Department of Agriculture statistics (U.S. NRC, 1977). In the evaluation of contaminant bioconcentration in fish tissues, a 10,000 square meter watershed was assumed as the source of contaminated surface soil runoff to a 950 square meter pond, in addition to contaminants contributed by air concentration deposition. MAJOR C0MCLU8X0NS OF STUDY The results of this Health Ris)c Assessment clearly demonstrate that despite the extremely conservative assumptions employed in this assessment, there is no significant human health ris)c due to the use of TAP as a replacement for a portion of the aggregate in a section of bituminous pavement. In fact, the local air quality and the health of the local residents will be improved by paving the road. In addition, the beneficial effects 17 ?y-■■ ■' Sliilph% m ?- ^ n-- ;f ^?VrS f iji " - ":, I ?^- •ii-^ W' .. r? % K’' ^?i'- J< 92-47.08 from paving the road with either of the considered roadway materials are similar. Table 1 summarizes the Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) and Respirable Particulate (PM,o) concentration estimates from botii paved and unpaved roads. It can be seen from the data provided in this table that concentrations from unpaved surfaces are about 30 times greater than those produced from paved surfaces. Also, the TSP con^^entrations are about 3 times greater than the respective PM^ concentrations, and concentrations at a distance of 10 meters from the road are about 8 times greater than at a distance of lOO meters from the road. Table 2 summarizes the results of the deposition calculations. It can be seen from the data provided in this table that deposition resulting from unpaved surfaces is about 30 times greater than deposition from paved surfaces. Also, TSP deposition is about 20 times greater than PM,q deposition due to the higher settling velocity. Finally, deposition amounts at 10 meters are about 9 times greater than at 100 meters for TSP and about 7 times greater than at 100 meters for PMjq. Table 3 summarizes the total carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic health risks to infants, children, and adults resulting from inhalation, ingestion, r.ermal contact, and consumption of foods raised and grown near the demonstration project respective for the three considered scenarios (nonpaved road, or road paved with the two considered road materials). The data provided in Table 3 clearly demonstrate that none of the noncarcinogenic hazard quotations exceed the U.S. EPA goal, for any of the considered scenarios, and that the potential carcinogenic risk was well below the U.S. EPA acceptable range of 10“* to lO""' excess cancer risks. The effects of the three roadway materials potential impact on the local aquatic ecology was assessed by comparing total water concentrations due to air-deposited and surface water runoff contaminant contributions to applicable water quality criteria. Again, the TAP containing paved source contributions are .less than all applicable criteria. Food chain products grown or raised within 10 meters (less than 33 feet) from the road were found to not contain any of the metals of concern in concentration which exceed naturally occurring levels. 13 S' tR.V- I. fc '■-’. J-i *‘!ift H.r ’ -t . ts • 'V fe* ■^V.: ■ (';A ■ jigs,•■ -k?-' !*>;:. • > ^ P. -T* . :■;;;' “ V ky ■ >• , » r- • Si I ':l Xr kr-. jwM'" 92-47.08 TXBLB I XIQfUXL AVERAGE GROUND-LEVEL C0MCENTRATZ0K8 OF T8P AMD PM„ FROM VEHICULAR TRAFFIC OV FAVED AlfD UKPAVCO PIONEER TRAIL ROADWAYS Annual Average Concentration (ag/mM Receptor Distance Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) Respirable Particulate (PM..; Paved Unpaved Paved Unpaved 10 meters 12.0 372.7 4.0 134.5 100 meters 1.4 44.0 0.5 15.9 TABLE 2 ANNUAL TOTAL DRY DEPOSITION OF T8P AND PM„ FROM VEHICULAR TRAFFIC ON PAVED AND UNPAVED PIONEER TRAIL ROADWAYS Receptor Distance Annual Total Deposition 1 Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) 1 Respirable Particulate (PM,.) Paved Unpaved Paved Unpaved 10 meters 563.2 17,556.6 f 23.7 78S . 6 100 meters 60.5 1,338.5 3 . 1 102.9 -f i®'r SC'®- K-v ®VV. 'ik'• • fe. i-s B-- ,* r- 1^X r?LA.t :i: I km- ws. ir ■ i 92-47.08TABLE 3 TOTAL CARCINOGENIC AND NONCARCINOGENIC RJSKS TO INFANTS. CHILDREN a ND \DL LT5 RESULTING FROM INHALATION. INGESTION. OERM a L CONTACT AND CONSUMPTION OF FOOD EXPOStW pathway EXFOStRE MEDItM NONCARaNOCEMC K a La RD QLOTIENTS Ca JICI^OCENIC R.SICS ! roadway soil ifVPAVED ROADi '^E-Ol *<E05 , 1 UFETIME [NHACATION OF PAHTlCCTAm natural a OOR£G a TE j ME.JI () t rA?'AGOR£GArE *4E-r: , -.E.rj INHALAnON OF PAJRTICLIATES BY AN CNF ANT roadway SOIL 1 nE<.l 1 •E« ' .C?/PAVED ROADt ‘ i natural Ao CREO a TE I <‘E^KEO- TAF'ACORECArE lEOI 1 ; ■ *£ 0- 1 DEILMAL CCNTACT BY A CHILD ROADWAY SOa. )d E-)3 j na lOTAVED ROADt • .N'ATLTIAL ACORfOATE . i <E-04 ] sa ■ 1 TAP'AGO REG A IT 1 ACCZDEKTAL INGESTION BY A CHILD roadway soil i (UNTAVED ROADi ''E-03 N A natural AOCREGAn 1 i 5 5E-Lrj NA i TAP.'ACOR£O a TE \ 1 1 roadway soil i'E-j: lUNFAVED ROADi \A UFETIME INGESTION OF groundwater NAlXltAL aggregate :E<T2 sa rAP'ACOREGATE '<»E-07 1 INOESnON OF groundwater BY AN INFANT roadway SCO. 'oE-02 ' NA .UNTAVED RCa D i natural a OCREC A rE 1 =£-<T2 NA TAP.'AOOREG A TE * *E ‘71 i ' SE 10 i dermal cost act WTTH ROAD RUNOFF BY A CHILD roadway SCO. :;eo 4 <L‘V?AV^ RO a D ‘ SA natural AOCRECArE * .£05 NA TA//AOOR£C a TE ;e«j*: E *: ACODENTAL OtOBnOH WTTH ROAD KUNUPF BY A CMLD roadway SCO. Itt'OJ (UNPa VED RCa D> NA NATURAL aggregate ■na TAP-AGOREG a TE ‘EOJ I'E II FOOD CHAIN . roadway SCO. ' EJJ (•w'NT a VED RO a D> 1 natural AGC REG ATE ‘Ea M na TA/a GOREG a TE •'£->»01 it* V r: r ' j ^ • I ■1. - • s' ■'M. &• ^ ^-: Ut 3Hy ■:i.i r\“ /•: I- F <-■•-•. ■W^‘. F -c'V r‘--^r-Iji ">• V- ■ ''ffk U-i w-r |:r 92-47.08 In Sluuuiry, the two main conclusions of this study are: This study predicts no adverse health effects resulting from the use of TAP in this demonstration project, because the noncarcinogenic health effects are calculated to be below the U.S. EPA goal, and the potential carcinogenic risks are estimated to be well within or below the U.S. EPA acceptable of 10'‘ to lO’ excess cancer risks.range All three alternatives considered in this study are safe, based on the results of this study. UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS A semi-quantitative uncertainty analysis was performed on the various factors contributing to the risks developed in this risk assessment. Such factors include uncertainties arising from sampling procedures, chemical analysis, toxicological parameters (i.e., carcinogenic slope factors and non-carcinogenic reference doses), and uncertainties in the variables used to estimate chemical intakes. These intake variables include such factors as chemical intake, chemical concentration, contact rate, exposure frequency, and duration and body weight. The uncertainty analysis conducted for this project revealed that a wide range of uncertainty (several orders of magnitude or greater) exist, with most of the uncertainty being in the conservative direction because of the conservative assumptions used in this assessment. This means that there is a substantial amount of overprotection in the resultant risk numbers. REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), 1988. Toxicological Profile for Chromium fPraft). U.S. Public Health Service, January l‘^88. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), 1988. Toxicological Profile for Lead (Draft). U.S. Public Health Service, May 1988. ATSDR, Toxicological Profile for Lead. Toxicological Profile for Cadmium, Toxicological Profile for Arsenic (drafts), U.S. Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, draft documents, 1988. ? 1 m,. 0'-‘ If •‘^- ■ kfr; iH^iL 92-47.03 Bowen, H. J. M., Trace Elements in Biochemistry, Department of Chemistry, the University Reading. England, 1966 Bowers, J. F., et al., 1979. Industrial Source Complex (ISC) Dispersion Model User's Guide. U.S. ERA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, ERA 450/4-79-030, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. Chemical. Physical, and Biological Properties of Compounds Present at Hazardous Waste Sites, prepared for the U.S. ERA by Clement Associates, Inc., 1985. Domenico, P. A., Palciauskas, V. V., Alternative Boundaries in Soil Waste Management. Ground Water, v. 20, pp 303-311, May-June 1980. Dragun, J,, The Soil Chemistry of Hazardous Materials, 1988. Federal Register, Volume 50, No. 229, Wednesday, November 27, 1985, page 48900. Lyman, W. J., Reehl, W, F., Rosenblatt, D. H., Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods, 1982. Sax, N. I., Lewis, R. J., Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, Seventh Edition, 1989. Travis, C. C. , Yamb«jrt, M. W. , Arms, A. D., Hattemer-Frey, Health and Safety Research Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 1988. H. , U.S. NRC, Regulatory Guide, 1.109 Calculation of Animal Doses to Man, Office of Standards Development, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, October l‘^*’7. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1980, Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Chromium, Office of Water Regulations and Standards, Criteria and Standards Division, Washington, D.C., EPA 440/5-80-070. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1980, Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Selenium, Office of Water Regulations and Standards, Criteria and Standards Division, Washington, D.C., EPA 440/5-80-070. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1985. Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors. Fourth Edition. (AP-42), Office of 22 f-;L* • 'V* !>■ 1: :l' b'** 92-47.08 Air Qualify Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, September. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1985. Chemical, Physical, and Biological Properties of Compounds Present at Hazardous Waste Sites, Final Report, prepared by clement Associates, Inc., Arlington, Virginia.^ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1986, Second Addendum to Air Quality Criteria for Particulate Matter and Sulfur Oxides (1982): Assessment of Newly Available Health Effects Information, EPA/6OO/8-86/020A. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1986. Superfund Public Health Evaluation Manual. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, EPA /540/1-86/060, OSWER Directive 9285.'-!, October 1986. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1988. Control of Open Fugitive Dust Sources, (EPA-750/3-88-008), Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, September. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1988. Superfund Exposure Assessment Manual. Office of Remedial Response, EPA/540/1- 88/001, OSWER Directive 9285.5-1, April 1988. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1989. Risk Assessment Guidance for Suoerfund. Volume 1, Human Health Evaluation Manual, (Part A), Interim Final. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, EPA/540/1-89/002, December 1989. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1989. Exposure Factors Handbook. Exposure Assessment Group, EPA/600/8-89/043, May 1989. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1991. Health Effects gnmmarv Assessment gyjtn^^yy Tables. Annual FY-1991. 06WER (OS-230), OERR 9200.6-303(91-1), January 1991. verschueren, K., Handbook of Environmental Data on Organic Chemicals, Second Edition, 1983. '7^ V - iV -.^i w i ;-'-r 4tl:2'-'■ir:>r FACTS ABOUT: MUNICIPAL SERVICE: CORPORATION Municipal Services Corporation ("MSC") is a suosic^ary of US?'-^, Inc., a company that has provided safe, effective solutions to Ar.erca'_s tougnest waste problems over the past Uo decades. USPCI is a suosiJiary or the Union Pacific Corporation, a Fortune 100 transportation, energy and natural resource company established in 1862. MSC was founded to develop comprehensive systems for the management of municipal solid waste ash ("MSW ash") including processing, utilization, and disDOsal as well as the management of other non-hazardous municipal, industrial and commercial waste streams. MSC is headguartered in Kennesaw, Georgia. Research and Development Usino its own laboratory and pilot plant research and development facilities, MSC has developed technology to manufacture a synthetic, construction-grade aggregate from MSW ash. The aggregate passes stringent state and federa tlits for environmental safety and physical strength, ano is a valuable voo for preserving irreplaceable natural mineral 1 disposal capacity. The synthetic aggregate product i be Suiu^ole .or number of applications, primarily aspnalt paving and roao base. Echo Mountain Facility Development To augment the MSC program for MSW ash utilization, the company an existing disposal facility located about 9 miles from Sawyer, (lor.h Dakota and re-named it Echo Mountain Facility. The MSC plan for development of the this ^posal^ facil ity jncjudes expansion of the site and an upgrading of the design lO currenc SLdt - environmv^ntal technology" This includes leacnate first monitoring and composite liner system "obstruction. When compleU^^^^ cell to be constructed by MSC will pxceec state end federal standaros ror environmental safety in the disposal of non-hazardous wastes .y a wide margin. Facility Operation Current plans contemplate that beginning in the second^ hai fo/ 199!, the MSC Echo Mountain Facility will begin accepting about 270 tons of MSW ash in enclosed rail containers. In .edition -o '^J^cUitv for^ the canacitv MSC is planning to install equipment .it .^, . j recovery’of metals ^from MSW ash. The metals will be will steel mills for recycling into new products. The Echo n Faci 11ty w continue to accept non-hazardous ccrrmercial arc industrial waSte. w currently disposed of at the site. The combination of expe.ncnce. technical nationwide resource financial strength and operating re utation mane MSC .no ‘J. Pf USPCI, Inc. and Union Pacific Corporation, ^ A responsibility of managing the Echo Mountain Facility us.ng a. , p environmental management techniques. For Further Informiition Conuvic^. Fred Gustin (zci^ w2i-19C" :dCd' 199-9219 FA.X _ A' V 4 • i"m •Jr vv: »v- If A- i- p.^ • \ ■m ♦’ ■". 'i A.r:_ V' .Jf Ic' -t":-I -..v - ■N^-' fee.' 2r;ir ; ^ • r. T'' ■' ^■/:- J-i •■ V ' ,:: %:■ik ■*. V , 1 *- %;'';■ i f. I' ■ 1^;' '.VI'. I fr fWbh -*t ! V FACTS ABOUT: USPCI, INC. USPCI, Inc. is a subsidiary of the Union Pacific Corporation, decades, USPCI has provided solutions to Ar.ercan industry's probletns. Headquartered in Houston, Texas, USPCI is corrimitted today's most advanced technology to ensure saie, efficient and r waste treatment, recycling and disposal cperations. This corporate has earned the company a national reputation for excellence in compliance and innovation in technical processes. For two toughest to usinaw esponsible philosophy regulatory It was this reputation that attracted the interest of the Union Pacific Corporation as it moveo tc diversify its business. A Fortune 100 transportation, energy and natural resource company, Union Pacific was established in 1862 by an Act of Congress authorizing the transcontinental rail road. After deciding to enter the environmental management industry in the mid- 1980's, Union Pacific conducted an exhaustive nationwide search, investigating nearly every major environmental ccmoany in the United States. The result wa_ the selection and acquisition in 1987 of USPCI, precisely what Union Pacific set out to f*’nd - th*^ best, safest, and most technically advanced company in its field. Disposal, Incineration, Treatment, Recycling and Utilization USPCI currently operates two state-of-the-art regulated RCRA waste disposal facilities. The sites, cnosen for their environmental safety, are believed to • I ^ • 4 « *1^ t_ _ . . ^ .A \ A ^ .A ^ ^ ^ •be the most advanced of their Type. They are located at: Grassy Mountain, located in Tooele County, Utah, about SO miles west of Salt Lake City. Lone Mountain, located in Northwest Oklahoma, near the town of Woodward. Additionally, USPCI operates facilities in Utah for disposal or non-hazardous industrial and PCB materials. An additional non-hazardous industrial waste disposal facility is in the development stages in Minnesota. USPCI is developina two incinerator facilities, and has acquired land in Utah, received a county permit and a state permit for the first incinerator in Utah. The Utah facility, designed to burn mainly solids, will accommodate up to 7bO tons of waste per day. The other planned USPCI Oklahoma. The Oklahoma facility will burn between 200 and 300 .ons of hazardous waste daily, primarily solids. Botn will incorporate sta .-of t art pollution control technology. -fc^fnaJedinTndTe'turre^d ^if t^^^rfeJ^^iirusT^ PPH's chemical treatment processes are located in Georgia, Pennsy . Kanscis, Utah and Canada. "•f.: F--1 • ^V»V. I w fc' ^:;- £ 1:I » B ^vaV'V,. H: ?>*:w: S -:IJl Ifc I?:rr mnA¥" t I & I ^:-I L •» liSi USPCI's subsidiary, JTM Industries, Inc. of Kennesaw, Georgia, is an industry leader in the reuse and recycling cf ccrrbustion by-products, including coal ash from electric utility companies and cement kiln dust. JTM operates disposal, service and marketing facilities in over fifteen states. Municipal Services Corporation, or MSC, was founded to develop comprehensive systems for management of municipal solid waste ash. MSC has developed technology to safely use municipal solid waste ash as synthetic construction aggregate. Use of this technology will help solve a pressing national problem relative to the management of municipal solid waste ash. USPCI also is the parent company of Hydrocarbon Recyclers, Inc.,^called HRI, an industry -leader in the processing of contaminated oils and solvents. HRI facilities are located in Oklahoma, Texas and Kansas. Analytical Services Using the most advanced laboratory analysis technology, USPCTs National Analytical Laboratory in Tulsa, Oklahoma provides a wide range of services including hazardous waste evaluation and water monitoring. Research and Engineering USPCI's research and engineering division is unrivaled in the industry and acts as a resource and support department for all USPCI operations while offering a variety of services to its customers. Responsible for developing efficient and cost-effective solutions to a wide range of problems, the research and engineering division also ensures strict adherence to quality and safety standards. Remediation Services USPCI's Special Services Division provides a full range of on-site waste management services for USPCI clients, from controlling uhe damages caused by hazardous waste emergencies to the clean-up of old dump sites that threaten ground./ater supplies and the ecology in surrounding areas. Transportation In addition to having authority for interstate transportation of regulated waste materials, USPCI has access to the Union Pacific Corporation's rail transportation network. Access to this transportation netv'ork allows USPCI to compete nationally and gives its customers the assurance that wastes are transported safely. The combination of experience, technical ability, nationwide resources, financial strength and operating reputation make USPCI and its parent company, Union Pacific Corporation, uniquely qualified to handle the responsibility of protecting the environment using safe, proper and thorough environmental management techniques. For Further Information Contact: Fred Gustin (404) 424-1900 (404) 499-9219 FAX hvj, Jv'- V^/‘• V- -\ '/ - V'r '• ^ ' i v-v^-* r-:- ;v;li United States Environmental Protection Agenqr Solid Waste and Emergenc/ Response (OS-305) EPA530-SW-90-Q2SA March 1990 CHARACTERIZATION OF MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION ASH ASH EXTRACTS, AND LEACHATES COALITION ON RESOURCE RECOVERY AND THE ENVIRONMENT EPA WORK ASSIGNMENT NUMBER 90 CONTRACT NUMBER 68-01*7310 NUS PROJECT NUMBER 9583 Dr. Walter Shaub CORRE. Project Manager Dr. Doreen Sterling EPA, Project Manager SUBMimO FOR NUS lY:appro VIO; —OjUOl GREOORY L ZIWMERMAN.P.E. PROJECT ENGINEER HAIA K- ROf FMAN, I^jp. PROJECT MANAGER Ir;.',;''' I-, v^:-. W'r \ 1 = i' 1 - ,*5 ,* pt' il •VrS^"’-•' if • f,;-" V 'if--:fifep(0^,.F^. ife f.-t. ■ -.■ (■■ table of COfJTE.NTS SECTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 INTRODUCTION . PAGE ES-1 l * A*1.1 BACKGROUND ....................................... 1.2 SCOPE OF V.'ORK ............................................... ^ V fei St'[r 2.0 FACILITY ZA FINDINGS ..................................................................... k:: 2.1 FACILITY ZA DESCRIPTION .......................................2-1 2.2 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASH ..................h 2.3 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF LEACHATES___ 2.4 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASH EXTRACTS ....___ 2-4 3.0 FACILITY ZB FINDINGS ....................................................................................... 3^1 3.1 FACILITY 25 OESCRIPTiON ........................................................... 3-1 3.2 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASH .......................... • 3.3 3.3 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF LEACHATES ..................... 3-4 3.4 CHEMICALCHARACTERIZATiON OF ASH EXTRACTS ............. 3-5 4.0 FACILITY ZC FINDINGS ......................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 FACILITY ZC OESCRIPTiON ........................................ 4-1 4.2 CHEMICALCHARACTERIZATION OF ASH ...................................... 4-2 4.3 CHEMICALCHARACTERIZATiON OF LEACHATES ...................... 4-3 4.4 CHEMICAL CHA pRACTERIZATION OF ASH EXTRACTS .................. 4-4 5.0 FACILITY ZD FINDINGS ......................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 FACILITY ZD DESCRIPTION ............................................................... 5-1 5.2 CHEMICALCHARACTERIZATION OF ASH ................................. 5-2 5.3 CHEMICAL CHAR.ACTERIZATION OF LEACHATES......................... 5-3 5.4 CHEMICAL CHARACTE.RIZATiON OF ASH EXTRACTS .................... 5-5 6.0 FACILITY Z£ FINDINGS ...................................................................'.................... 6-1 6.1 FACILITY ZE DESCRIPTION ............................................................... 6-1 6.2 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASH ...................................... 6-2 6.3 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF LEACHATES........................ 6-3 6.4 CHEMICALCHARACTERIZATiON OF ASH EXTRACTS ... ............. 6-4 7.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS ....................................................................................... 7-1 7.1 7.2 7.3 CHEMICALCHARACTERIZATION OF ASH ...................................... 7-1 CHEMICAL CHA.RACTERIZATION OF LEACHATES........................ 7-3 CHEMICAL characterization OF ASH EXTRACTS .................. 7-4 REFERENCES APPENDICES R-1 A B C D FINAL WORK PLAN ASH RESULTS LEACHATE RESULTS ASH EXTRACT RESULTS ft p^-' r?5'' •; 'V.i-'fti te-|?w h-t-: tf’ Nellisi*. p.j.-'^'.' If":^ "ft [ft.-/ .6 ■■ bQ'- i^y. ftii1 iff ■1. V is. fift- 0^ . feSft,.. . r NUMBER ES-1 ES-2 ES-3 E5-4 1-1 2-1 2-2 2-3 2-4 2-5 2-6 2-7 2-f: 2-9 2-10 2-n 2-12 3-1 3-2 3-3 3-4 3-5 3-6 3-7 3-8 3-9 3-10 4-1 4-2 4-3 4-4 4-5 4-6 4-7 4-8 5-1 5-2 H3399H TABLES PAGE Major Feat'jres cf iMLVC hac:i<:;es ........................................................... Major Features of iV.V/C A^n Dtsccsal Facilities ................................... Ash Dioxin Results ........................................................................................ Comparison or Ash Extract Metal Analyses Results with ................ Leachate Metal Analyses .Results Sample Analyses .......................................................................................... JRcStricred Wastes, Facility ZA ................................. ............................. Ash Semivciatile Results - Sample ZA-AH-003, Facility ZA ................ Ash Dioxin Results - Sample ZA-AH-003, Facility ZA............................. Ash Metals Analyses, Facility ZA ............................................................... ,-vsh Conventional Analyses, Facility Z.A ............................................... . aachate Semivciatile Analyses, Facility ZA ........................................... LcsC.nate Metals Analyses, Facility ZA ..................................................... Leachate Conventional Analyses, Facility ZA......................................... Leachate Dioxin Analyses, Facility ZA ..................................................... Comparison of Ash Extracts Semivolatiie Analyses with Leachate Semivolatile Analyses, Ranges of Concentrations, Facility ZA Comparison ofAsn Extracts Metals Analyses with Leachate ............ Metals Analyses, Ranees of Concentrations, Facility ZA Comparison of Ash Extracts Conventional Analyses with .................. Leachate Conventional Analyses, Ranges of Concentrations, Facility ZA Ash Semivolatiie Results - Sam,pie Z3-AH-C01, Facility ZS ................... Ash Dioxin Resuits ■ Sample 23-AH-CC I, Facility Z3 ............................. Ash Metals Analyses, Facility Z3 ............................................................... Ash Conventional Analyses, Farility Z3................................................... Leachate Metals Analv^as, Facility ZB ............................................... Leachate Conventional Analyses, Facility ZB ........................................ Leak Detection System Sample Metals Analyses, Facility Z5 ....... Leak Detection System Sample Conventional Analyses, ..................... Facility 23 . • , , u Comparison cf Ash Extracts Metals Analyses with Leachate Metals Analyses, Ranges of Ccncent.-ations, Facility 23 Comparison cf Ash Extracts Conventional Analyses with ............ Leachate Conventional Analyses, Ranges of Concentrations, Facili ty Z3 ^ ... __ Ash Semivolatiie Results - Sample ZC-AH-G03, Facmry ZC.............. Ash Dioxin Results - Sample ZC-AH-CC3, Faciliry ZC ......................... Ash Metals Analyses, Facility ZC ............................................................ Ash Conventicnal Analyses, Facility ZC............................................... Leachate Metals Analyses, Faclity ZC ................................................. Leachate Conventional Analyses, Facility ZC ..................................... Comparison cf Ash Extracts Metals Analyses with Leac..ate ........ Metals A.naivses, Ranees o* Concentrations, Facility ZC Compariscr/cf Ash Extracts Conventional Analyses witn Leachate Conventional Analyses, Ranges of Concentrations, Faci ity ZC Semivolatiie Results ■ Sample cD-AH-003, FaeJity ZD ............ Ash Dicxin Results -Sam.ple ZD-AH-003, Facility ZO......................... ES-4 ES-6 E5-8 E5-12 1- 4 2- 6 2-7 2-8 2-9 2-10 2-1 1 2-12 2-13 2-U 2-15 2-16 2-17 3-7 3-8 3-9 3-10 3-11 3-12 3-13 3-14 • • • • •3-15 3-16 4-6 4-7 4-8 4-9 4-10 4-1 1 4-12 4-13 5-7 5-8 i I I iK.1 w U" K' I vi.,-. :fe-'i ' W'-i lr.j. t:"- #'■' y- •M V:.;' NUMBER 5-3 5-4 5-5 5-6 5-7 5-8 5-9 6-1 6-2 6-3 6-4 6-5 6-6 6-7 6-8 6-9 6-10 7-1 7-2 7-3 7-4 7-5 7-6 7-7 7-8 7-9 7-10 7-11 7-12 7-13 7-14 7-15 7-16 »33S9n TABLES (C3r,fr;jor;) PAGE tj to ^eac.'iate Ash .Vi€ta!s Ara'vses. rac:iitv ZD ..................... « s Ash Ccnventicra! Analyses, ?ac;l!ty 2D .... Leachate Metals Analyse ;. .-ac:iity ZD .......... Leachate Ccnve.nt.cnai Ar.aiyses. Fac.itty 20 Compa.'isor, o: Ash E^t.-'ac*. Sen-i-.ciat^'e ReSo Semivolatile Results. Facility 2D Comparison of Ash Ext-'acts Metals Analyses with Leachate ............. Metals Analyses, Ranges of Concent.-ations, Facility ZD Comparison of Ash Extracts Conventional Analyses with Leachate . Conventional Analyses, Ranges of Concentrations, Facility ZD Acceptable Waste, Facility 2E .................................................................... Ash Dioxin .Results ■ Sample 2E-AH-CC3, Fac.lity 2E ............................. Ash Metals Analyses, Facility 2E ................................................................ Ash Ccnvent'cnai Analyses. Facility ZE ................................................... Leachate Semivciatile Analyses, Facility 2E .......................................... Leachate Metals Analyses, Facility ZE ..................................................... Leachate Conventional Analyses, Facility ZE ......................................... Com.panson of Ash Extract Semivoiatiie Results to Leachate ........... Semivolatile Results, Ranges of Concentrations, Facility ZE Comparison of Ash Extracts Metals Analyses with Leacn'ate ............. Metals Analyses, Ranges of Concentrations, Facility ZE Compar:son ”of Ash Extracts Conventional Analyses with Leachate . Conventional Analyses, Ranges of Concentrations, Facility ZE Com.pariscn of Ash Semivolatile Results ................................................. Ranges of Concentrations of Semi vole tiles in Fiy Ash., Pottem Ash, anci Com.binec Ash from Municipal Wa«te Incinerators Ash Dioxin Results ................................................................ • • ................... Ranges of Concentrations of PCDOs, PCDFs, and PC3s in Fiy Ash, .. Bottom Ash, and Combined Ash From Municipal Waste Incinerators Ash Metals Analyses, Ranges of Concentrations ••••••;................... Ranges of Concentrations of inorganic Constituents in Fiy Ash, ,.. Comlainec Ash, and Bottom Ash from Municipal Waste Incinerators Ash Conventional Analyses, Ranges of Concentrations ..................... Leachate Semivolatile Results, Ranges of Concentrations ................. Concentrations of Organic Constitue.nts in Leachate from ............... Municipal Waste Landfills, Ash Monofills, and Co-Disposal Sites Leachate Oioxm Results, Ranges of Concentrations .......................... Concentrations of PCDOs/FCDFs in Le ichates from Ash Monofills, . Ranges of Concentrations Leachate Metals Analyses, Ranges of Concentrations ......................... Ranges of Leachate Concentrations of Inorganic ............................... Constitue.nts from Monofills Leachate Conventional Analyses, Ranges of Concentrations Ranges of Extract Concentrations cf Organic Constituents From MurTicipal Waste Incinerator Combined Fiy Ash and Bottom Ash for Three Leacning Procedures Ash Extracts Metals Analyses, Ranges of Concentrations ....... Comparison of Literature Values with Results Obtained During CORRE Stucy 5-9 5-10 5-11 5-12 5-13 5-14 5-15 6-5 6-6 6-7 6-8 6-3 6-10 6-11 6-12 6-13 6-14 7-6 7-7 7-8 7-9 7-11 7-12 7-14 7-15 7-16 7-18 7-19 7-20 7-21 • •••••7-23 7-24 7-25 IV l?r-i‘'-' >lIV:. •.,. .'■|sa. te.' rV’ ■ ■ S:. I-'-i Jm\": ^,.y* •.•.''^ ■r*r sr M ^?-H'': fe-'i-, W'ri?'f' fe' b'-Vy ■ ■lilv ■■ my^mi ■ ■ ■k' €% ^;y- iP%;':fe'. * l. r ^i- *lr p- isfeii l&'¥ V, rt . p-y''- • ■ - .V pym^- FIGURES NUMBER 5-1 Water Quality Lysimeter Installation Detail PAGc 5-4 i «i«»t ■ ■ 'I -_i ^ fr,-,.-. IV IP- •; ,-r^f: ., K.ii/.' ♦r ?V f« , i? r^‘ ‘■'V 4 V<4 ■m W' '0- • V v-v''-0'B. i^vi -C - • ,•> \ nr rM-v-v-r.^'/.•V'lT*..*-... <.- %\ •• 4-iv *4 J* *>=t •iJ ■■ *. iH- i; * i'l i. f- fi",, ■'*'i*"4. r. . -^ : Vi;, V* L V ■ r-, V ■' '" ACRONYMS A.ND DEFINITIONS A STM AWQC mencan Soc.-ety forT^^tmg and Matenals mcien: 'A'ater Qual :/ Criteria CDC Cente'-s for Disease Control Co-Oisposai CORRE ERA £5? MCL mg Monofill MSW V1VVC iND PAHs PCBs ppb ppt QA/QC RCRA SMCL SW-92A TCLP TDS It TE? TOC *3399t« Vi,! Disposal tccetner of municipal sclic wastes and munK;pal solid waste combustion ashes Coalition on Resource Recovery and tne Environment Extracfon Procedure U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Electrostatic Prec-pit’tcr crams kilograms liter Maximum Contam.nant Level milligrams A landfill tna; contains only sciic waste comcusticn^sr.es and residues I Municipal Solid Wastes i'y'l u n, I c i 0 a I W aste Combustiori Mcncriile^ Waste Extraction Procedure, also known as SvV-S24 Not detectec. Polynuclear Aromatic Hycrocarbcns Polychlonnatcc Biphenyls Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dicx.ns Polychlorinated dioenzcfurans piece ram par-.s per cillion pars per trillion Quality Assurance/Quality Control Resource Conserration and Recovery Act Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level Deionized Water Extiact.on Test Method Toxic Characteristics Leaching Procedure Test Method Total Dissolved Solids Toxicity tcuivalents Toxic Equivalency Factors otal Organic Carpcn micro 9 rams !:fc ■' ■iSf- ;•• -V ■'. ' p*. ■W>iv ,i> ('(A- , ^V!. ^•> 'X,;: ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS (Continued) TCDO Tetrachloro Dibenza-p-Oioxin PeCDO Pentachloro Dibenzo-p-Dioxin HxCDO Hexachloro Dibenzo-p-Dioxin HpCDD Heptachloro Dibenzo-p-Dioxin OCDO Octachloro Dibenzo-p-Dioxin TCOF Tetrachloro Dibenzofuran PeCDF Pentachloro Dibenzofuran HxCDF ■Hexachloro Dibenzofuran HpCOF Heptachloro Dibenzofuran OCOF Octachloro Dibenzofuran i I V1 i*'. •A .-. :* . ft ^ •k ^ » •-_ •• ■i'. ■»•. ' • .J-* i''*: .t ■its# '•■V' ;'''■?' ■■ f} ivSl iliiimm km ‘.Vt ,Ai? liife .-, V ..■' '■ , - . «• 'i:.7 •■.“.•#■ .*■ 1r- Ik ifi'.. Pl^. 1% ■ r> ■' ' i' .Pkuv-; ''-'’.V; , ■ -'i. ^iV-. r: ■'V.:... if: H ^ h r -wm' '.■.'7 :l;_ V ■ .. ... i ^ ■':' : * • i .This report has undergone internal review by the United States Environmental Protection Agency and by the Coalition cn Resource Recovery and the Environment and has been subjeaed to peer review as well. Peer Reviewers Frank J. Roethel, Ph.D. Research Professor Marine Sciences Research Center Waste Management institute SUNY Stoneybrook, New York David S. Kosson, Ph.D. Research Professor College of Engineering Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Rutgers University Piscataway, New Jersey Taylor Eighmy Research Professor Department of Civil Engineering University of New Hampshire Durham, New Hampshire M1M««« » \ I •.J* s 1 ,1 p--.-¥ r'"'' F-''I: if: m.. tH r P^<'- ■W 0"’ ■tm.te.I|i- Ss^'i- i*'' ••. ■', hw tW- ill.. fi,: V'*- fe-' . V 7 > • r>-'^v -Publication of this document shall not be construed as endorsement of the views expressed herein by The United States Conference of Mayors, the Conference of Mayors Research and Education Foundation, rr any feder?' finding agency.' 'V ■ 0‘h- -^¥ >w . *t.-- ■ . • mh'. d-'d}*'- ■ • myp.te:' K. mp-n’lssn py-y- ■ .-«r. • » !-•, #• Si- ?t-.' I'-tt ' ■■ ' rr v|;'.:’. W:-m'. • i5- ■ i;? L: A*'-'* r5'-*' i" >fm h. iL s. yi ' ‘T' * 1 ^ V *5 •■ t‘1- r » ”• f ;v,-s ^:v- EXECUTiVc SUMMARY This report has been prepared for the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Coalition cn Resource Recovery and the Environment (CORRE). EPA and CORRE have cosponsored tr.is stucy, conducted by NUS Corporation, to enhance the data base on the characteristics of Municipal Waste Combustion (MWC) ashes, 'laboratory extracts of MWC ashes, and leachates from MWC ash disposal facilities. The Coalition cn Resource Recovery and the Environment (CORRE) was established to provide credible information about resource recovery and associated environmenfol issues to the public and to public officials. In providing information, CORRE takes no position as to the appropriateness of one technology compared to others. CORRE recognizes that successful waste management is an integrated utilization of many technologies which ta<en as a whole, arp best selected by an Informed public and informed public officials. Incineration of municipal solid waste (MSW) has become an important waste disposal alternative because it provides an effective means of reducing the volume of MS'V as well as an important source of energy recovery. Currently, 10 percent of MSW is incinerated. Based on the num.ber of municipal waste combustion (MWC) facilities being planned across the count.’y, this percentage is expected to increase to roughly 16-25 percent by ;he year 2CC0. As incineration has grown in popularity, so has concern over the management of increasing volumes of ash. Ashes from MW'C facilities have, on occasion, exhibited a hazardous waste characteristic as determined by the E? Toxicity Test. The debate regarding the regulatory status of ash and the representativeness and validity of the E? test continues. Congress is considering several legislative initiatives that would give EPA clear authonry to develop special management standards for ash under Subtitle D of RCRA. To conduct this study, NUS collected combined bottom and fly ash samples from five mass-burn MWC facilities and leachate samples from the companion ash disposal facilities. I ES-1 . * ; % 'L *\ ■> I-,. :■>■'; ■ ■■ '’y:^ y\ •'V Th- ’■ i'cV .,*■ ' t:\ The facilities sampled were selected by CORRH to meet the following criter*a; The facilities were to be state-of-the-art facilities equipped with a variety of pollution control equipment. • The facilities were to be iccated in different regions of the United States The companion ash d.sposal facilities were tc be equipped with leachate collection systems o' som.e means of collect -.g leachate samples. The identities c^the facilities are being held in confidet-'e. The ash and leachate samples collected were analyzed for the Appendix IX semivolatile compounds, polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins/polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDDs/PCDFs), metals for which Federal primary and secondary drinking water standards exist, and several miscellaneous conventional compounds. In addition, the ash samples were analyzed for major component^ m the form of oxides. The ash samples were also subjeaed to six laboratory extraction procedures and the extracts were then analyzed for the same com.pcuncs as the ash samples. The following six extrar.ion procedures were used during this study: Acid Number 1 (EP-TOX). Acid Number 2 (TCLP Fluid No. 1). Acid Number 3 (TCLP Fluid No. 2). Deionized Water (Method SW-924). also known as the Monofill Waste Extraction Procedure (MWEP). CO2 saturated deionized water. Simulated acid rain. • These extraction procedures have been used separately by a variety of researchers on MWC ashes but never have all six procedures been used on the same MWC ashes. This study was designed to compare t.he analytical result' of the extracts from all S'x prO'.adures with each other and with leachate collected from the ash disposal facilities used by the MWC facilities. I ‘T'itr^'-'il'I, i’^'r i * ^”‘- pTr- --:.fet;. f|^ >5-^i»'.’.,.. te^>Ifc il"' -Tih. ¥ • ■ -'K:' V ■r.>S|k:r, m 'M:y- ■rt viV? m. i-■.='! • 'f’ t?' '■ "■ ffe ' ■ H' •:■!■ - j^vSSl # tfe. k-4I> ^.'S'.i''‘4,- ti M ■ *f---- .y- I h - III: iS?. life-. ,V ' ■ *' '■ *4:^ . -iv; ■,":•■ ■*.vr:-‘l j.'V.v.», :,". w#- |H■^ All sampling, iaborator/ preparation, and labcratcry analysis followed stringent EPA quality assurance/quality control (QA^OC) procedures. The work was performed in accordance .th the Work Plan (Appendix A) precared by NUS for this project and with a QA/QC Plan prepared by NUS and approved by EPA. A deta led listing of the positive results is presented in a data base which is included in this Report as Appendix B (Ash), Appendix C (Leachate), and Appendix D (Ash Extracts). The results in the data base are presented as reported by the laboratories, complete with the laboratory's qualifications. Summaries of the results are presented in Sections 2.0 through 7.0. These summaries include the laboratory's qualifiers and also qualifiers placed on the data as a result of data validation. When the laboratories did not report a positive value for a com.oound (i.e., the compound was not present above laboratory detection limits), the compound was reported as not detected (ND) in the tables in the text. The laboratory detection limits are the method detection limits for each specific method, unless interferences were encountered during the analysis. When interferences occurred, the laboratory adjusted the m.ethod detection lim.its by an appropriate dilutfon factor. The analytical methods used in this study were selected so that the method detection limit' well below present levels of human, environmental, or regulatory concerns. The EPA publication "Interim Procedures for Estimating Risk Associated with Exposures to Mixtures of Chlorinated Dibenzc-p-Oioxins and Oibenzofurans (CDOs and CDFs)" was used to evaluate the dioxin data. These procedures use Toxicity Equivalency Factors (TEFs) to express the concentrations of the different isomers and homologs as an equivalent amount of 2,3,7,8-Tetrachloro Dibenzo-p-Dioxin (2 3,7,8-TCDO). The Toxicity Equivalents, as calculated by using the TEFs, are then totaled and compared to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommended upper level of 2,3,7,8-TCDD Toxicity Equivalency of 1 par. per billion in residential soil (Kimbrough, 198A). The major features of the five MWC facilities are provided in Table ES-1, and.the m<ajor features of the MWC Ash Disposal Facilities are provided in Table ES-2. Pertinent information regarding the operating conditions of the MWC facilities, as well as Information about the air pollution control equipment used by the .facilities, is also provided in Table ES-1 . R33S9t »ES-3 if-'er'B»v ■7* , '■-> llpfc* |C: Ife. ilb y ■ mi Av V ^■rS^ lit- I' sri’Vi;s:i. *B?" r':^ ■ '•■ i ^. r- V - pt " '• I&: .. 11 Wff r .v ‘- -X--'' ■-■;*'■ H''^ vi'\=; f:-t, o‘‘’ I'-- vV ». .S . .• Bll te4 PfiX^rv.mm^ The majcr fincircs of the ash sa-pUng and analyses d-r nc :.^;s study are desc-ibed in the foilovving paracrapr.s. Of the five ash. samples (one frc.m each fac:'?/) ar.aiyzec for the Appendix IX semivolatile compounds, four samples contained b!s(2-ethyihexyl)phtha!a..e, three contained di-n-butyl phthalate, and one contained di-n-octyl phthalate. Two PAHs, phenanthrene and fluorant.hene, were detected m only one of the five ash samples. These semi-volatile compounds were dete--ted m the parts per billion (ppb) range. The results for the five ash samples (one from each facility) analyzed for PCOOs/PCDFs are presented In Table E5-3. This table also includes the calculated Toxicity Equivalents (TE) for each homciog of PCDO^PCOF. These i cs were calculated using EPA s m.ethodoiccy (EP-^. March table indicate that PCOOs/PCDFs were found at ext.'em.ely low levels in each ash sample. The Total TE for each ash sample v/as below the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recomm.ended 2,3,7,8-TCDO Toxicity Eouivalency limit of 1 par: per billion in residential soil (Kimbrough, 198-i). All 25 of the ash samples (five daily composites f.'om. each facility) were analyzed for the metals on the primary and secondary drinking water standards lists as well as for the oxides of five major ash com.ponents. Alt.'-ough, t.ne results from these analyses indicate that the ash is heterogeneous, this heterogenicity appears to have been reduced by the care taken when ccmpcsitmg the ash samples curing this study. Comparison of the results of this study with results reported in the literature (EPA, October 1987) indicates that the variability of results for each compound appears to have been reduced in this study. Metals showing the widest range of concentrations arr.ong samples collected at each facility included barium (Z3); cadmium (23); chromium (ZO, ZE); copper (2A, Z3, ZC); lead (ZO); manganese (ZA, ZC); mercury (ZS); tine (IB, ZO, ZE); and silicon dioxide (ZA). Metals showing the widest variation of concentrations between the facilities included barium (results for Facility ZC are lower than the results for the ot, er facilities); iron (results for each facility vary f.-om all of the other facilities); lead (results for Facility ZD are higher than the results for the other facilities); mercury (results for Facilities ZC and ZD are lower than the results for the other facilities); H3319II ES-7 -I 1 :U i1 .1 ”1 iC;rf-V' »■:.?■' iv ‘ ' ■ ■ •-» -■» ^•y- r«., V k. ■ '•*•'» '*-' ^**^’' -1?; *^' t f ,. vVii^ s :»S |5 •« •, /• li vj*'V ■'r'j 'SJ@ j^tiv.il ... . ^ ;* • ^ '7 *' mmm-v k'*,. I :-■ /v;*,-...' ,-»,^r , -i t.a , -. 'N- ■' •fr' I'*; , -J ' i ‘ 1^*' Si^ ^v>i ’.K' ^■■" ■i'v- ', 1 K-'V: W-^ir*''r.;L- »rp^ 't‘* ■* sodium (res.lu for Faciht.esZD endZE are lo«er than the -esults for the other fachties); calcium oxide (the results for Facilities ZA and Z3 are higher than the results for the other facilities): and silicon dioxide (the results for Facilit/ zc are higher then the results far the ether facilities). Some additional findings of the ash sampling an(j analyses are as follov/s: The ashes are alkaline with the pH ranging from 10.36 to 11.85. The ashes are rich in chlorides and sulfates. The total soluble solids in the ashes varied from 6,440 to 65,800 ppm. The ashes contained unburnt total organic carbon (TOC) ranging from 4,060 ppm (0.4 percent) to 53,200 ppm (5.32 percent). The major findings of the leachate sampling and analysis during tnis study are summarired in the following paragraphs. V Only four Appendix IX semivolat.le compounds were found in the leachates from the ash disposal facilities. Benzoic acid was found in both leachate samples colleaed at one of the five ash disposal facilities. Phenol, 3-methylphenol, and 4-methylphenol were foun in some of the leachate samples from one of the other facilities. All of thesa compounds were detected at very low levels (2*73 ppb). PCDOs/PCDFs were only found in the leachate from one facility. The homologs found are the more highly chlorinated homologs. The data obtained during this Study appears to indicate that PCDOs/PCDFs do not readily leach out of the ash In the ash disposal facilities. The low levels found in the leachates of the one facility probably originated from the solids found v/ithin the leachate samples because these samples were not filtered nor centrifut, id prior to analysis. None of the leachate samples exceeded the E? Toxicity Maximum Allowable Limits established for the eight metals In Section 261.24 of 40CFR 261. In addition, the data from this study indicate that alt.hough the leachates are not used for drinking purposes, they are cjcse to being acceptable for drinking water use, as far as the metals are concerned. X3399I «E5-9 rir ik^itnitr ■i t i •V‘V"' t^r.- W- -. * .V, ■• /vv |SM; • f - * * Av>;-r-.-‘ ^' :■ »• m r#?9ffi*' --y-;' ■' ’’v w^m r A. ■ ii?' itM"' 'f >. ■•■V v..^ •>- u.v -• ^ V? !•. ;.7 . f- k. lr> 1%. w • ' f ;-5u- W;-! .'f>v 41' ‘.V;:;, Some other findings of the leachate sampling and analyses are as follows: Sulfate values ranged from 14.4mg/Lto 5,060 mg/L. while Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) ranged from 924 mg/L to 41,000 mg/L. The field pH values ranged from 5.2 to 7.4. • Ammonia (4.18-77.4 mg/L) and nitrate (0 01-0.45 mg/L) v/ere present in almost all leachate samples. Total Organic Carbon values ranged from 10.6 to 420 ppm. The major findings from the analysis of the ash extracts during this study are summarized as follows: 1>\ • Of the five composite samples of the deionized water (SW-924) extracts analyzed for the Appendix IX semivolatile compounds (one from each facility), only one sample contained low levels of benzoic acfd (0.130 ppm). None of the extracts contained PCDDs/PCDFs. These data confirm the findings of the aaual field leachate samples that PCDDs/PCDFs are not readily leached from the ash. The data obtained during the metals analyses of the ash extracts indicate that, in general, the extracts from the EP Toxicity, the TCLP 1, and the TCLP2 extraction procedures have higher metals content than the extracts from the deionized water (SW-924), the CO2, and the Simulated Acid Pain (SAP) extraction procedures. The EP Toxicity Maximum Allowable Limits for lead and cadmium were frequently exceeded by the extracts from the E? Toxicity, TCLP 1, and TCLP 2 extraction procedures. One of the extracts from the E? Toxicity extraction procedure also exceeded the EP Toxicity Maximum Allowable Limit for mercury. None of the extracts from the deionized water (SW-924), the CO:, and the Simulated Acid Rain (SAR) ext.'sctio.t procedures exceeded the EP Toxicity Maximum Allowable Limits. In addition, the majoriry of the extracts from these three extraction procedures also met the Primary and Secondary Drinking Water Standards for metals. »339Stl ES-10 . la A r-v f.< S?iH, »:■ M^f- r'-*- r.VIt te Table ES-4 compares the range of concentrations of the metals analyses of the ash extracts with the range of concentrations for leachate as reported in the literature (EPA, October 1987) and the range of concentrations for the leachates as determined in this study. For the facilities sampled during this study, the data in Table ES-4 Indicate that the extracts from the deionized water (SW-924), the CO2. and the«SAR extraction procedures simulated the concentrations for lead and cadmium in the field leachates better than the extracts from the other three extraction procedures. , - K. ti:- •f'. .V * ■i lli" sw ' - ■ ■' K4v-i'> m. m- fe.'. Isi4 -.' t R33fSn ES-11 i .f iv-=:■N ■V'lto:,;.:.-; 5; ^ >:'•■f*>: •“ .• mtei- ’!Js:. ii K?J':> if/-'- ;Xi w.:- ‘/-r:/ *Vv . '■ - ./:.V' " CjiV ^ ■ - .'>0 A' -/.. : *. fr'ii- '>#;■ ^ • •■ -;A ■ir--' /‘ ■-., r. «. . ,• 4 .^. ... fj:?- '* f ' f/F 5?-'. -■ /»■ K...‘::- 0'‘ ■t-i? V :/!t /'# :■ *^:-- H'SNNEPIN COUNT'i/MSC DEMONSTRATION PROJECT HEALTH RISKS WILL THE MUNICIPAL SERVICES CORPORATION DEMONSTP PROJECT POSE A THREAT TO THE RESIDENTS ALONG PIONS£,R i.-filL, TO THEIR PROPERTIES, OR TO THE ENVIRONMENT? No more than the construction or a road us^ng conventional materials such as asphalt cement and stone. No more than using compost made from municipal solid waste in their gardens. ■k it No more than spreading municipal sludge on croplands. Probably much less than leaving Pioneer Road unpayea and allowing the residents to breath in ousts that become airborne whe.never a car drives past. . recent Hennepin county traffic count showeu drove across this stretch or roaa curing one 2 4 hou^ period. BUT ISN’T IT TRUE THAT THE SYNTHETIC AGGREGATE CONTAINS ASH ?MM HEl^PIN CCUir-Y HASTE-TO-ZKDRGY FACILITY IN DOWNTOWN MI?fNEAP0LI3? Yes it is true that the MSC synthetic u'u;i-:^ate, or TAP, contains MSW a - However, MSC has spent i.e years developi j a °a^ck t^^ wo-^ doing somethingtho.se raw mateuials can be put f constructive, like building roads, instead of throwing aw y that ash forever in a landfill. Table 1 shows t.hat the MSC TAP comes very close to ^®eti^ Minnesota Pollution control Agency Ss-andar-s t aeSl^« such as lead, cadmium and mercury in Cyass I =*==ost. Class I .oapost is produced from yard w t and municipal solid waste, or garb-oge, and les is allowed in home vegetable gardens, on c!Sf co^t“r'ations of heaJ; metals above the Class I limi^ Class II compost may be used in specific appli- -ions with the permission of the MP^'A soils are divided into three olassifioatiens ^fl-anua^t^'^or ..cationic Exchange Capacity'., or ^iXi^ ,fi;"Tvtlen?S "tie ud" the heavy nerals in t.h s-^eOgt^ n- - u-ed to per lo’o grams (Mec/lOO g) is the unit that is u.ed to I LViUji yw Ae» » •Pv^'-- ». •; •* t/5: P\ ■'.!• •♦^ 1* »P^--ip-\ . c iMi Mii- * ,v;;VC'.- m,. .. s. ».'jfr- . 'rh ‘p:4- ■ pm^ t. -- Av^:: \, f. • V'.: pii ■• • ■M0f:l' -,ar/-:' :.‘ p m% ■ ** V:.- li ! ■ ■ '■''■■ i'"--'t'*. » , » * I. .; . §$h TOTAL COMPOSITION ANALYSES OF MSC SYNTHETIC AGGREGATE (TAP) COMPARED TO CLASS I COMPOST (ALL UNITS IN MG/XG) PARAMETER TAP MINNESOTA CLASS I COMPOST CADMIUM CHROMIUM CO .‘PER LEAD MERCURY NICKEL ZINC PCS 17.3 56.8 465.0 570.0 4.3 112.5 1775.0 <0.25 10.0 1000.0 500.0 500.0 5.0 100.0 1000.0 1.0 NOTES:Tap Samples were crushed to powder (minus 100 sieve) prior to analysis. Minnesota Class II compost may have higher approved applications only. TABLE 2 TOTAL COMPOSITION ANALYSES OP MSC SYNTHETIC AGGREGATE (TAP) COMPARED TO MINNESOTA LANDSPREADING REQUIREMENTS MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE LOADINGS (ALL UNITS IN LB/ACRE) Soil Paraseter Type r soil Type II Soil Type III "Worst-Case" TAP Disintegration Scenario LEAD ZINC COPPER NICKEL CADMIUM* 500 250 125 50 5 1000 500 250 100 10 2000 1000 SCO 200 20 -> «7 234 57 9 NOTES:B’oil Type I .Soil Type II Soil Type III < 5 meq/ 100 g 5-15 meq/ 100 g > 15 meq/ 100 g * Special rules apply for c. . aim. .1 ■■ Ip.' fe-'- Wym ■w. ■'-■•-€■■ ir:’-'' '•■t-rV I.’,' ■ f'S ■iJS' -“ r^-. r. P ^''-p '■P'P &■'' ■ If'" :-^>\ . i 't r V---' J.| • p;:-; f^’: ^ ->• fet ■M^' ky:^^ below the amounts of heavy metals that can be ^at^enuated before thev will becin to pass through into whe groundwate^. S^en LriLit/^ no additional municipal sludge may be spread. Table 2 shows that even if the entire roadway wore to disintegrate into dust before action could be taken to remove it, the concentrations of tne TAP not exceed limits that have been set .or -ne municipal sludge on most soils in Minnesota. Of course, the test strip will be inspected fre^erjly and if it shows signs of unusual deteriora^-on, -- will o picked up and disposed of properly, long fceiore even partial disintegration could take place. Meedless to say, nobody is suggesting that the TAP be used for growing vegetables or for spreading on croplanos, fllhoSgh it^s nuch less likely that hea^p. in the TAP could enter the environment ^...an the met..ls contained in Class I compost or municipal Su.udge. This is because the heavy metals that rra as^aro first chemically changed by the MSC process so that thev will not dissolve, or "leacn", under even very harsh Snditions. The chemically treated ^ cementitious materials .o provide is nrocessed into TAP. Out on the roaaway, tr.. ia±' Sill be loc.ked up in the asphalt pavement, providing an additional, although unnecessary, barrier. BX3 MSW ASH BEEN USED AS A HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL IN OTHER PLACES? Yes in the United States, MSW ash is being tested boto its- natural -tata and in ?Srravenfnrfn^%^eral post notably Kev fork. Florida, and New Jersey, with good results. The environmental standards for the MS,, date^^^The^T^^has k%::sS2 S synisiF 4 4 ■*' ' ‘*'*J * {^y> pr-.h }:>!!>■ ■ " p4-,.:; %i5?d5. iP'r-\ ‘.^ IfM i ', /‘ . ii|Ric■ f,'.' - ' • *'*, •■ :-T.-..-i. Im;a?" ,. V- J- ■ ■ j' •. Mm, : ■» ‘' 2_j_ttle doubt that the Kenne«:.n Ccunty/MS«w SenoTiS v.ration Proiect is one of the nest cenprehensive studies of the environmental and physical suitability of an alternative roadbuilding material ever undertaken. WHAT TYPE OF TESTING WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE THE ROAD WILL BE ALLOWED TO BE BUILT? The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency is requiring u..at^the MSC TAP meet even stricter environmental stanaards Class I compost or municipal sewage sludje before it will ■vr;rmit the test strip to be built. First. the ash in its raw, unprocesned state must be Sat"';re“"mlreriTt“"I..f Ish^'^- priduce^TAP analyzed in this fashion wO evaluare their environmental safety. aiid , ind if w.et.ar a* -Tir' slfndL-f is required for Class I compost or municipal many commonly used construction materials , as well natural soils, that do not meet these rigorous standards. Following the environmental testing, tiie TAP is tested in ® highway construction materials testing l^oratory to that it will perform well as a pavement ag^egate, These Ssts measure the TAP's durability under ^arsh environmental conditions such as freezing and thawinc^ cycles, chemi attack, and heavy traffic. WHAT MEASURES WILL BE TAKEN TO ENSURE THAT THERE WILL BE NO PROBLEMS AFTER THE TEST STRIP HAS BEEN BUILT? The KPCA, Henneoin County and MSC, with input from a wide variety of interested citizens, has spent the past ono an one-half %aS develooing a permit for the Demonstration that has some very precise ar.d rigorous reguirenents for monitoring of the site. Of course, the TAP must be tested and deterriined Vi«<»r»-ro the MPCA will allow the test strip to be built. Af^er the test strip has been built however, test grSkS Of the aclual pavecent, as well “ air, soils, and waters ii. the vicinity of the site, mrirr h—ni'ftirtH S®’-' ipv W: l®g«.K?I,„fe'5. r:|T':efl^:. f V , ■ : ■ f:Uis-4 tiSf'-.py* !«■■:■: S|R‘ ..-rnff,:-. \. *: ,'t ■ pT ' . life#" iS»^ -f K; ?'5 ■c;p ■: i. ■ -"i-v ’;' ;i-- Ni#v> -mk.: lift '■' ■■■yy -' .■- ■ pS?"i#-^' Jfeif'. Jii- 1® determine if anv deterioration of the TAP is taking place. ThesrtLples «ill be analyzed carefully by an independent l^oratory to find out if even very seal contaminants are leaving the roadway. If it is di^overed 4»Vi^*r-o aT*ft anv DiroblGn^s witili tiis tss*-. sv.^^pf caie iroaQ would be removed and taken to a landfill disposal site for burial? The test section would then be replaced with standard asphalt pavement. In addition to environmental scientists and technicians visiting the test strip on a regular basis to collect SMDles the permit requires that Hennepin County and MiSSesrta Depa^ent of Transportation highway engineer visit the test strip on a regular basis to P?r*ora iiaoections of the road. Any unusual deterioration will be spotted long before it has an opportunity to wear down or cause a problesi. in sum, every effort will be made to ® "°l\"h?^orot°e^tfon^rf"fe#r cr:ofe=fe?f'4n=/ tfee^ envL4^e^i SSough tL combined efforts o’f the MPCA, Hennepin County, and Municipal Services Corporation. For further information, contact: Hugh P. Shannonhouse, President Municipal Services Corporation 1000 Cobb Place Blvd., Bldg 400 Kennesaw, Georgia 30144 (404) 424-1900 i I r*-i te- DATA SHEET HENNEPIN COUN^/MUNICIPAL SERVICES CORPORATION JOINT DE3<ONSTTOiTION OF MSN ASH UTILIZATION H«nnepin County proposes to pave a secticn of Pioneer Trail west of County Highway 19 and east of the Corcoran city liciit using a synthetic aggregate produced by Municipal Services Corporation, a subsidiary of USPCI and the Union Pacific Corporation. The aggregate, called "TAP," is made using the combined ash from Hennepin county's HERC Waste-to-Snergy Facility as the principal ingredient. The Demonstration Project will verify the enviror-mental safety and the physical roadbuilding properties of the TAP. It will also further reduce reliance on landfill disposal by putting back into useful service the ash that remains from the incineration of municipal solid waste. Bure ar# some facts: The entire length of Pioneer Trail west of County Highway 19 and east of the Corcoran city limit will be paved by Hennepin County, although only a test strip of approximately 500 - 6C0 feet will contain the TAP. The ash has bee product that meets standards. rested to make the TAP an enviro:,.-uentally safe Minnesota Department of Health Drinki.ng Water XAP has been tested extensively using standardised procedures thaw have been approved ty the followina agencies ana scientific organizations: - United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. iPrw) - Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) - Minnesota Department of Transportation (MN DOT) American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM) - American Association of State Highway Transportation Ofricials (AASHTO) • As a comparison, laboratory analyses conducted on the TAP show that it would be suitable for use on certain pasture and cropland, as is municipal sludge. Further, the TAP approaches the standards for Class T compost, for which unrestricted use is permitted on both commercial and residential soils as a natural fertilizer. The project will be conducted under the strict conditions of a permit to be issued by the HPCA. The site will be inspected and monitored on a regular basis over a period of five years. Samples of the pavement will be analyzed for any changes; as well as samples of Mie air, soils and water in the vicinity of the test section. For further information contact: Hugh ?. w...mnonhouse. President Municipal Seir/iceB Corporacicr. Building 4C0 1000 Coc j Place Boulevard Xenneaaw, Georgia 3C144 (404) 424-iSCO ORAXXON ATZOM : Trail w«*t of County » aynthotic a9gr«9«to iary of OSPCl and tho la nado uaing tho norgy Facility aa tho lantal aafaty and tho LI alao further roduco iiaoful aorvico tho aoh waato. / Highway 19 and oaat opin Ccunty, although will contain tho n envirofiittontally aafo Health Drinking Water lardized procedurea that mciea and scientific ■ncy (U.S. EPA) tl DOT) TM) ‘ranaportation Official* on tho TAP ohow that and cropland^ aa le im atandards for Claoe ad on both coBwercial t conditions of a permit egular basia over o ill be analyxod for Ls and water in tho .ctt tnt .or. . m m. - ‘- m -’r - m MMm ■ m-.m :|f ■aft" ":;p . bbM ■ :m ^ 1;^ ■-y; ■W ■^1 , ■' ^ ’«®f 4 ews,'JSPS • 139-000)Crow River N dina-Corcoran-Loretto_______ Tests show ash safer than gravel No significant risk found in ash TAP' product I r ■V i ■r r iftI'- fe: m^r: Af V- ’ ! i: ■ . ■P fl ' Lauri Winters A recent report says that waste ash, when used to pave roads in a bituminous product, docs not cany beaith risks. The report, from AWD Tech nologies, Inc. and released in September, suies, "There is no rignincaM human health risk due to the uae of TAP (treated ash product) M aic|iiacemait for a portion of the •ggregaie in a section of bitumi nous pavemenL In fact, the local air quality and the health of the local leaideaia will be improved by F9«iagibenad." The aaicasmeni was prepared at the request of Municipal Services Coipoittioii, (he Georgia firm that manufactutca the product, which usea of a combination of fly ash and bottom asb fror»/{.g'f«’'Fin County'i HERC Waste-to-Energy Facility ia Mbui' ^lls. Predericlc Oustin. aen*or project engineer for Municipal Services Cocponiion, and Dr. Haia Roff- man, diiecior of risk assessment and toxicology for AWD. a siibsidiary of Dow Chemical Company, were in the Twin O iCi Nov. 5 and 6 to discuss the health lisk report with state, county wid city officials. They also met with residenu of Cotcoran iriio live mi die section of Pkmea Drail which may be used as the demonatration proje^ l-R.i ,1;: >■' 1 •••I-'If It PROPOSAL Tte Gomuy has prc^)oscd lo pave a portioo of Pkmcer Trail bciwcen County Rd 19 and the Greenfield tionier fai Corcoran using a mixture of conventional malcrials and ihc synthetic aggregate produced by Municipal Services Corporation. The purpose of the project is to demonstrate itic environmental safely of the synthetic material and hs physical road-building qualities. The one*haIf mile segment of Pio* necf Ttail would be paved by Hen nepin County. This portion would include up to 750 feet containing the TAP. Approximately 30% of the pavement material would be TAP. according to Custin. TESTING The test project would be done under cmidtiions of a permit issued by the Minnesota Pollution Con trol Agency (MPCA). The sue would be inspected and monitored on a regular oasis for five years. Samples of die pavement would be analy/cd for physical and chemical changes. In addition, air, soil and water in the vicinity of the test section will also be tested for chemical composition. "Anything coming off the road will be found in the soil long be fore it snows up in the ground wa ter." Roffman said. She also stressed that Minnesota standards for concentration of contaminants in surface water from airborne de posits and roadway runoff are more stringent lhan die federal levels. ASSESSMENT Before beginning die actual lest project, laboratory tests of unpaved roadway soils, conventional surfac ing material and TA were con ducted to dcicrminc Ihc potential health risks and environmental im pacts of three aiiernalivcs: leaving the load unpaved; paving the road with conventional asphalt macriai usir^q 100% natural aggregate; paving the road with asphalt in which 30% of the convcnliunal inalcrial has been replaced wiih TAP aggregate. The combined TAP has been treated lo make a physically suit able aggregate material and an environmentally safe product, ac cording to the health risk assess ment report and Gustin. He said heavy metals in the ash arc bound with other materials and arc chemi cally immobile. They arc not water soluble. The tests used standardized proce dures approved by tlie United Slates Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). the Minnesota Pollu tion Control Agency (MPCA). Minnesota Department of Trans portation (MnDOT), American So ciety for Testing and Materials ami th#* American Associatio'' ol Stale Highway Transportation ufficials. The three road materials were ex amined for hazard identification: dose-response evaluation, exposure assessment and risk characicriza- tit4i. The main factors considered in each of these criteria arc summa rized as follows; IDENTIFICATION The objective of hazard idcnlification was to examine in formation and analytical data on contaminants in the three roadway materials and to identify the con taminants which arc dcirimcnial to those who arc exposed. This was done by reviewing existing scien tific information regarding the toxicity of each contaminant. The research included plant, animal and human exposure information. DOSE-RESPONSE Another major comjKmcnt of the risk assessment is llic rciaiionship between the anuMiru of material the indivii.nal ts cx|H>scd lo and the (K)- icniuil for adverse health f'llccls re sulting from that exposure. Ihis provides a means by which poten tial public health impact is cvalu^ atcii. Coniammarus with established regulatory limits and toxicity data for potential health and environ mental effects were identified in die three roadway materials and were included in the assessment rc|x)rt. EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT The exposure assessment evalu ates the potential for human and cnviroiuncntal contact (cx|x)surc) witlt the contaminants idcmilied in the roadway materials. This in cluded clicmicals released lo the en vironment. the route a contaminant follows through an environmental medium, the exposure or contact point and the presence of human or environmental recipients where ex- |X)sc occurs. Exposure may he through inhalation, ingestion, dermal (skin) contact or the fixxl chain. Furihci, cxtx)surcs risks were figured on the most conservative assumption that a person spends 24 hours per day outdoors, is exposed 3o5 days a year for 70 years ( ly at ihc portion of the road where e paving mate rial is used, infants would be ex posed for the same period for three years, individuals would live within 33 feel of Ihc road their entire life, consume only food proc^ucls grown within 33 feet of tlic dcmonstralion project and the only liquids they consumed came from the study area. RISK ( IIARACTERIZATION *Ihe risks to human health arc examined through the use o( ■‘caicmogcnic slope lactors ai I ref erence doses." I hc United States EPA dcKS not use a Single mirnlK'r as crilcrin. but a range. 1 he goal ranges arc from one excess ease of cancer in 10,000 people to one in 10,000,000, CONCLUSIONS The study showed the ground- Icvcl of TSP (total suspended par ticulates) and respirable (breathable) particulate conccnuraiion estimates from unpaved roads were about 30 limes greater than those on paved nxMls. It also showed ihe deposits of TSP and respirable particulates from vehicular traffic arc 30 times greater on unpaved roads than on a paved road. The data from the study clearly demonsuates that none of the noncarcinogcnic (non-cancer causing) hazard amounts exceed the U.S. EPA goal, for any of the roadway surfaces, and the potential caainogcnic (cancer-causing) risk is well below the U.S. EPA accept able range, according to the sum-^ mary report. TAP materials conuibutions were less than all applicable criicrta in regard to potential impact on the i(Kai aquatic ecology by comparing total water concentrations due to air-deposited and surface-water runoff. Food chain products grown or rai.scd within 10 meters (less than 33 feel) from the road will not con tain any of the heavy incials which cause conccni in loncciUraiion lliat would exceed levels which occur naturally. "The study predicts no adverse health effects resulting from the use of Tap in this demonstration pro jects. because the noncarcinogcnic health effects arc calculated to be below the U.S. EPA goal, ond the poicniial carcinogenic risks arc es timated to be well within or below the U.S. EPA acceptable range of 10 “^ (one in I0,(X)0) or 10*^ (one in 10.000,000) excess cancer risks. All three alternatives considered in this study arc safe, ha.scd on the re sults of die study ." TABLE i TOXICITY CHAP.ACTErllSTIC LEACHING PSCCEDUR (TCL?) ANALYSIS OF MSC SYNTHETIC AGGREGATE (TAP) (ALL UNITS IN HG/L ) UNCRUSHED TAP SANPLE i PARAMETER V X ^2 ^3 ^4 ARSENIC BARIUM CADMIUM CHROMIUM LEAD MERCURY SELENIUM SILVER COPPER ZINC <0. 05 0. 36 <0.0002 0. 05 <0.0002 0.0004 <0.005 <0. 01 <0. 01 <0. 01 <0. 05 0. 39 0.0009 0. 03 <0.0002 0.0007 <0.005 <0.01 <0. 01 0. 05 <0. 05 0. 39 0.0002 0. 05 <0.0002 0.0004 <C.005 <0. 01 <0. 01 <0. 01 <0. 05 0. 39 0.0003 0. 04 <0.0002 0.0005 <0.005 <0. 01 <0. 01 <0. 01 CRUSHED TAP SAMPLE 4 PARAMETER #6 47 ^8"T ARSENIC BARIUM CADMIUM CHROMIUM LEAD mercury SELENIUM SILVER COPPER ZINC , <0. 05 0. 41 <0.0002 0. 06 <0.0002 0.0004 <0.005 <0. 01 <0. 01 <0. 01 <0. 05 0. 58 0-0003 0. 07 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.005 <0. 01 0. 02 0. 01 O. 05 0. 62 <0.0002 0. 06 <0.0002 0.0004 <0.005 <0. 01 O. 02 <: 0. 01 <0. 05 0. 59 0.0002 0. 06 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.005 <0. 01 0. 02 0. 01 MINN. RAL 0. 05 2.00 0. 004 0. 10 0. 02 0. 001 0. 01 0. 01 1.00 0. 70 MINN. R.AL 0. 05 2.00 0. 004 0. 10 0. 02 0. 001 0. 01 0. 01 1. 00 0. 70 NOTES: (1) (2) (3) (4) RAL - RECOMMENDED ALLOWABLE LIMITS FOR CONTAMINANTS IN I^rASLYSErPERFORMEc' RTE^ENVIRONMENTAL. JS^E^I^OLIS msS?A, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE HENNEPIN COUNTY/MSC ASH DEMONSTRATION PROJECT- r SAMPLE #'s 5-8 WERE CRUSHED USING A MORTAR AND PESTLE, WITH: 99% PASSING A #40 SIEVE 48% PASSING A #100 SIEVE 30% PASSING A #200 SIEVE opoittdpc THAT DUE TO THE INITT.AL pH OF THE TAP, THE TCLP REQUIRES THAT ACID WITH A pH OF 2.88 BE USED IV THE EXTRACTION. •,7- Z !• Ki. . 'I''ir'.r/ fe:r t'l N • pi' uSf fe •■f ■'ivvi'.- ’.'■'1..V. V .' •'*» '•' .'••'■'v V ,^‘5>';* '.'V ^p' "r. ;:r life ■'Vr'l ■'i ;■ I’l mh: *.* ■ t:a fr: '■ f 'I. ■ ■ ■’ ri iv.?' -t'?- ^ ■ W'i'. ^ ': f ' , ■; > t.*': Ifl-fe.- bH f; i^.:-F-'.i- -■ •V '• u r'> TABLE 2 TOTAL COMPOSITION ANALYSES OF fisc SYNTHETIC AGGREGATE (TAP) (ALL UNITS IN MG/KG) CRUSHED TAP SAMPLE # PARAMETER n #2 ARSENIC BARIUM CADMIUM CHROMIUM LEAD MERCURY SELENIUM SILVER COPPER ZINC 30 750 18 56 570 4.6 <0. 25 7. 6 520 2000 28 710 17 65 6. 1 4. 1 <0. 25 7. 6 430 1800 43 1111II111\1■ iAVERY.GE 20 21 24.8 6 30 660 700. 0 16 18 17. 3 53 53 56.8 510 550 570. 0 4 4. 6 4.3 <0.25 <0. 25 <0. 25 7. 5 7. 6 7. 6 460 450 465.0 1500 1800 1775.0 NOTES: (1) TAP SAMPLES WERE CRUSHED TO POWDER (MINUS 100 SIEVE) PRIOR TO ANAF^siS. ( 2) ALL ANALYSES PERFORMED BY BRAUN INTERTEC ENVIRONMENTAL, MINNE^lPOLIS, MINNESOTA IN CONJUNCT xON WITH THE HENNEPIN COUNTY/MSC MSW ASH DEMONSTRATION PROJECT. §#'■ Pi K* !»>'-• V-' pp.’'"* pi. teii piri - - ' v ^ -. 1? •, ■ i' i ’irCt-.--; ' ■ ■■ ^ ■ 4 ‘sf^ >i0i^: pii" fefi- ■ k^iv--.;V . . tr-^' t f, ;, • ■ &. li' ; i A ■ “ i. :‘ ' ^ , P'p- ' - ' %••b"--' nt :■•:■': :C >'^4:-.ii. > •■: p' k''- '* ”’■ ■‘•['vn:'r-x: 1ra r^ €0 • * O § 2 o o" trto O -H > -o "O CJo O O - - O N O ^ ro ro JLJ O 3 CJ *:j 5 ^ > Z P"5* Vj o X yj Q ’O Vg O S3 O CD ^ I. ^ 1 » — ^ i 5 O 5?> § o o ^ -n -n ro ro C3 CJ Vj C5 o Vi O CD -L -L X* 3T o o o o-n Ti .- O Nro u ro CO c -ifc Z. Vj Vsi C*' CD n I a -Tj Tl O o o TT CD I X Oo CD Vi CD I -T3 O Oo “n o ro Cl c: ^ ’Z 3 ^ ^ f b -<^ P *-n ® o s ? -^ • IT o o o oi8|S = o = _=5??O ^o r' r-i -vj ro -i-2 ^ O ND o P LT» CD pj pj 1.- ^ CD io CD O Q CJ CD O Kd -Dk TO CD — O o o o o CDo 5! O ? CD O O CD o c: T'^ *— CD O C* Kd cn Ln » b -si C) b CD W iUD CD CD i b P o P b P ^f>j ro ^ CD *>J CD CD o .->i ^ ^ ::i S K r § S ? S. CD ilk o ro .V ro CD b Kd Kd CD o ^ zz ro CD ^ — a b o 3 —^ o CD b _SXo’^ooooo C71 ro b. lo ^ b *•>» b • f~*) Q) ^ CO CD Ob cn CD CD CD Ok —.ro ro CD CD c^ ^ ro ^ ^ , '^2f2 “b±r5o—>^^[j;^r^cor*“PP^^'^tDio^coQ^bcob-^bcouDcn giessisssp-sgOpO^-^CO-^CDCD—^OC)-^Ok CD CT -fe- o ^ A. o S ro la. ^ C i\3 o ^ 0.0. ro — ro ^ ^ CO o b •Vi cn o bo o ro o CD ^ ro CD ^D OOrOr-ZL ro ^ ro ro _ 5 b 5 b CO ^ Ho. Z. Vj *cr CD ~ CD O Q b b ^ » I O r- O ro 5- ro 5* CO CO 3 **xjo V CD ^ I O Z3 •vl C b- . . « 2o - — — o XXX O O O O O Oa o z? b I*oo O O o o ‘ ^8 = ^ — §Z5 c5=> = 3_o o55 c!OC50°o Z — j:». Ok Ok Ok L-'. CD — s o ^ ^ ^ ^ ^cr^CDOOCOOkOkCDOCOO o Ok So? o o o Z —. o. cn CD CO ^ CDCDkOOkroOtDCOCD CD _ Ok c*> Ok ro Ok CO ^ o CD ^ ^ ^ o — —‘Stnc^CtroO-^rcDOcnokCD^O — CO--------.ZCDfOCOOkCn-^CDOk OCDOkb-^OkfOO — CO § P b _ ^ ^CD ^________ . UD cncr. ©'•JCOOk^oCDOOk iSiS-SSSSSS s o Z o o p o —k fo cn r* cn b Ok bocnOOOkCDcno^o^o CD Ok ^ ^ coroorookCnCDcn—‘ dd So2 o o o (— ro *vi r~ cn CD CO ^ CD . OCDOOCOOrOCOCDOkuJ CO CJ ^ S ^ o Ok p P 7^ CD O — ro CD CD o.^ wD CT ro o-^ CD ^ o O w o- - UT— — CD CD CD w.^ ^ tDO^cocn— Og ”Do o # X oo ^ m —< > O O o c g -H < O ^ p ^ CO J o 5 nn * -H > ZJ m o Bo • ■ “O ro rr1 O 5 O o z: CO m o § o o * >! T) Ok > o ^ * Q m Si »rD UD O) c Or<- O t03 n rD LTD o -o cx» ri- ui Z3 o> -s r-r -5 ITS Oi |D» r-r l< O rD C/D CO O o ID •a r-f II •o (O o X to Q> z to -J Oi 00 01 3a 0) UD O -s roro *n 2- Ik, -;r:TiHNATIONAL i fcCHNOLOGT CORPORATION I jj" ............-03 A^NALYTICASERVICES CEKTlECi^IiH OF j^iN'ALYSIS U . Paula Connell Braun Environmental Labs. Inc. 6885 Washington Avenue South Edina, MN 55435 Febnjary 4, 1991 TDL PROJECT NUMBER: 4S2838 department NUMBER: EG-8C8 CLIENT PO NUMBER: 16239 This is the Certificate of Analysis for the following samples: . Client Project ID: E50-349 (Braun Environmental Labs, Inc.) Date Received by Lab: Novemoer 8. Number of Samples: Sample Type: _____ Ash/Cemen. --------------------------------------- 1ntrodi»ntion/Case Nar rative Four (4) samples were received November 3 aossSnce Ust total tetra through octa (Ck-Cla) dioxm and of all 2.3.7,8- and Appendix C. Chain-of-Custocy and fsoiked with an internal substituted isomers was also reques-^ec. '^C-PeCOD. '^C-PeCDF. ^dard atd blank were extracted and cleaned up using a mc^ined vvere analyzed ’ey GC/MS^rRA SW-846 Method 8280," reviseo Septemoer. l9So. bxiraas were diicx.y^ opetating in the ’selected ion monitoring mode for ennanced sensitivity. The samples were labeled with the following: Crushed Tap 1 Crushed i ap 2 Crushed Tap 3 Crushed Tap 4 Reviewed and Approved: Duane K. Root Analyticai Operations Manager tv-..»/BK072 _______________________ ----- — - ' *-'e'-.cvcr.cl .-s:cc tcU St L-.c9=2r.ce “^ ____ tr-*»»*^*'*^ * ■‘*t7t Cfw.w.93 -------- Lc^crc:cr/ .-ccr^ciicccn .V*’ T.'',5' rr Ar.clYtc=ci Serr.css • ^ --AY--’*® T^T 37^23 • ^615*) 6 '^-7211cters Dnve • r^cx'. ..e, . 4.J iAl.u4f ®|.- r-rirv . i-'V vm,"msir^'rS-'-. u- ■» ‘ **•. ■ "r i|;^;4- =; Mr^ * A. W:im- ss'\- .*:L- mm ss FHWA • OEHO PROJECTS INCIRFRATOR RESIDUE (1974 • 1979) TABLE 6 INCINERATOR RESIDUE TEST INSTALLATIONS Project Date Residue Percent Asphalt Cement Percent Lime Percent Length Meters Thickness Centimeters Performance Houston TX 1974 100 9.0 2.0 61 15 base excel 1ent Phila. PA 1975 50 7.4 2.5 . 30 3.8 surface acceptable Del aware Co.»PA 1975 50 7.0 2.5 18 3.8 surface acceptable Harrisburg PA 1975 50 7.0 2.5 73 3.8 surface poor Harri.ourg PA fused residue 1976 100 6.7 n.o 55 3.8 surface excellent Washington U.C. 1977 70 9.0 2.0 122 11.4 ba.«e good Lynn MA r 1979 50 6.5 2.0 approx. 1610 3.8 bir.der and surface excel lent J'-a* ::■Vi'-;: mmurn^ -'I ■3 '..-f QD t- ’k.r.f »M </ ife. 'it . f ' V..* ►v*?r *^ r*.'» ?r A :.A w......ffii^giiii^^#fe.. Coonc.i & 0^ -'/7/y ^■^^sssi'im ■Mi; mm I I Sc-1; Jf:_ ,-/■ • •>1 , 'i"fm ‘C' -;■-■? -c- »• I I-- ^k. ^ ^p» #/ -^n»,r » FANSLEE HOME I' ■wmm ■' w ? ^ r', 1.1 %