Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-13-1992 Council PacketPlanning rapjnisaic sJ tu ^ 1 w M.^ PUBLIC ATTEL'DALCZ CITY OF ORONO MEETI'.'G DATE. ///-A'' PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFOR^LATIOM REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. 1. NAME OR NUMBER Planning Coirjnission PUBLIC ATTEMDANCZ CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATS Jj ! PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER r;f AGENDA KOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JANUARY 13, 1992, 7:00 P.M. (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon request. Memos regarding each of the Aaenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. ROLL CALL 1. 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - Consider Temporary Closure of Spates Avenue at Brown Road South COUNCIL MEETING 2. CONS..T 'JAM13 19M APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 3. 1992 Budget Hearing of December 4, 1991 vl Mr OF ORONO * 4. Regular Meeting of December 9, 1991 * 5. Proposed DNR Maxwell Bay Lake Access Public Hearing January 6, 1992 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Richard Flint 6A. Sewage Treatment Plant Property Plan Proposal B. Park Planning C. Sandy Beach Swimming Dock Installation PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS 7A. Presentation by DNR and LMCD Regarding DNR Proposal for Public Access on Maxwell Bay PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT ♦•APPLICANTS** Immediately after the Council has reviewed your application please sign the three (3) original resolutions at the Recorder's desk. Applicants need not execute resolutions for subdivisions, vacations and denials. * 7. *1573 Carol Kelly/James Massey, 3020/3030 Casco Point Road - Final Subdivision - Resolution 8. #1682 Christine Brickley, 3262 North Shore Drive - Variance 9. #1701 Phyllis B. Sprague, 3340 North Shore '^rive - Variance (City Attorney mailed this item to Council J./10/92) MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT 10, 1992 Appointments - Resolution ENGINEBP REPORT * 11. Pay Request #2 Highway 12 Frontage Road Sewer and Water 12. Pay Request 13 Highway 12 Forntage Road Sewer and Water 13. Pay Request #3 & Final - Lift Station *11 Renovation CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT * 14. Confirm Board of Review Date 15. Bid Award - 1992 Materials and Fouioment 16. Certificate of Achievement - Financial Reporting 17. 1992 Recycling Bid Award 18. Tax Forfeit Properties - Resolution 19. Job Evaluation Update 20. Schedule Council Work Session Discuss 1992 Work Plan 21. 1992 Insurance Award - Worker Compensation 22. 1992 Police Vehicle Acouisition * AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JANUARY 13, 1992, 7:00 P.M.CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTLICENSES (23*) BILLS (24*) ADJOURNMENT tIKi : OPCOHING ISSDES AND EVENTS 01/13 - Council Meeting 7 p.m Council Chambers 01/14 - Facilities Design Committee 5 p.m. Orono Middle School Faculty Dining Room 01/16 - Lake Use Committee Meeting 7:45 a.m. Council Chambers 01/20 - Martin Luther King Day - Holiday 01/21 - DNR Open House 4-8 p.m. Orono Education Link 01/21 - Tuesday - Planning Commission 7 p.m. Council Chambers 01/22 - Hwy 12 Policy Committee 5:30 - Education Link 01/24 - Deadline for Planning & Park Commission Applications 01/27 - Council Meeting 7 p.m. Council Chambers 01/28 - Hwy 12 Technical Committee 1:00 Delano City Hall 01/28 - Hwy 12 Citizen Committee 4:00 Maple Plain City Hall PUBLIC HCARMG TO CONSIDER ’» « TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF SMTESAVENUEAT BROWINROAOSOLnH • ‘... f ' Th« City o( Orono wIN oondud « pubne hMTlng j#. opnsMtr a.lMiponify ofSpMM at ImarMcfon of Brawn Road Soutt (County Road 146). ' ; .‘Tn>„.Tha raaoealbr Via iwtiporaw dotura la ' k la praaaaad diat Via doalira wfl ranwin Paraofw wlafdM la ba liaa/d ahauW mtmmJyumi 1% 1M2, at 7:00 pjn. at Via Oram Caund Chimbora, .127$ Brawn tHrrijirfi 11* i M i ii< / CkyClarti • , ■■ il. va.t. j .(^Jiahad Tha Lahar Pton^ Jan/o.3'iW2).ivr..;;.«<«:>■• IvlS •. 1 V 4'; ' •, A «aaa A. Affidavit of Publication State of Minnesota. County of Hennepin. Bill Holm, being duly sworn, on oath says that he is an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as THE LAKER. Mound. Min­ nesota. and has full Knowledge of the facts which are stated below: A ) The newspaper has complied with all the require­ ments constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02. 331A.07. and other applicable laws, as amended B ) The prlnten ') Ilwhich is attached 'vas cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week for__________L________successive weeks: It was first put'ished Monday. the (p ^ day of iJi/mim-19& and was thereafter printed published every Monday, to and including Monday. the day of K>J HENNEPIN COUNTY My comnwiaion expires 7-KV97 Subscribed and sworn^ me on this day at, mrjinhil Notary Public Rate Information (1) Lowwct daksmad rtib paU by oomnwool uMTt tor oompar- abta apaoa $10.7« par inch (2) MajtVnum rata alowad by law tor abova tnaaar; $10 76. (3) Rato actutoiy ohwgad tor ibova rnaOBr: $5 B4 par not To: Prcsn: Date: Mayor Peterson and Orono Council Members John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director January 8, 1992 cofNcit Meeting JAN 15 1992 OF ORONO Subject: Public Hearing - Temporary Closure of Spates Avenue at Brown Road South On November 25r 1991 Council received a request for a road closure of Spates Avenue at Brown Road South. The request is due to traffic concerns by the residents on Spates Avenue. The City Council felt that a public hearing should be conducted to receive citizen input before a road closure is implemented. Attached is previous correspondence on this matter. Isv 112091.2 f • • ► ^I TO:Mayor and City Council FROM Ron Moorse, City Administrator DATE November 20r 1991 SUBJECT: Spates Avenue Traffic Concerns I have attached n memo from John Gerhardson concerning a traffic problem on Spates Avenue. Spates Avenue is being used as a shortcut from County Road 15 to Brown Road South creating unsafe conditions on the narrow residential street. The recommended solution is to eliminate direct access from Spates Avenue to Brown Road South. This would be accomplished by placing barriers on Spates Avenue on both sides of the railroad track. TO:Hon Moorse, City Administrator FROM:John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director DATE:November 14, 1991 SUBJECT: Spates Avenue/Railroad Avenue On Thursday November 7, 1991, Police Chief Steve Sullivan and myself met -ith some of the residences on Spates Avenue and Railroad Avenuf. The reason for the meeting was to discuss traffic concerns that the residents have and a possible resolution to the problem. Currently there are 400 vehicles per day using Spates Avenue. Some of the traffic is due to traffic back up at Co. Rd. 15 & 51 causing people to try to avoid the intersection by driving on Railroad Avenue to Spates Avenue to Co. Rd. 15. This traffic is mostly in the early morning rush hour. The other concern is aft moons and evenings when southbound Co. Rd. 15 traffic is turning on to Spates Avenue at high ra-es of spead causing concern because o£ children in or near the roadway on bikes and trikes . Everyone agreed that placing barriers on Spates Avenue on both sides of the railroad track would discourage the high speed traffic from using Spates Avenue (see attached sketch). It was agreed that we would recommend to Council to place the barricades as soon as possible but review the turn at Railroad Avenue and Spates Avenue to determine if the radius should be revised. k j t«rcrtv:v« rtmuMi [•WHi >»tf4 rtiKjfi [Wilt] PiltltTO :Wi •1A1 tm«L« •1 •I«lcT:T« tlf f • If •lll*l« rtHiTvl Mil*•lii^lvir P.YiT*r«] •IrlAl* • I MINUTES OF THE ORONO 1991 BUDGET HEARING - DECEMBER 4, 1991 Bruce F1ke asked what are the Interest payments on the bond issue which were proposed to be accelerated last year. He asked what were the normal Interest payments last year. Kuehn noted that they are In the water and sewer operating funds, and have not been accelerated this year. Callahan noted that $103,000 of the money allocated for fire protection goes to the Long Lake fire department. Weed asked If the Long Lake fire budget Is solely funded by contracts. Moorse stated the Long Lake Fire Department Is supported by contract cities plus tax levies. Jabbour pointed out the City does have a mutual aid agreement with the fire departments. Moorse explained that In regards to the tax levy. the general fund has increased only .4%, which Is basically frozen. Sewer and water bonds has Increased to retire the Crystal Bay sewer bond. The new Item Is the bonds for the new City facility. The total Increase In tax levy for 1992 Is 14.46%. Weed reiterated that amount Is the payment on the building bonds. He asked how much the City bonded for, and how much was In the bu1Idlng fund. Callahan noted the budget for the building Is $4,050,000 on the assumption that the decommissioned sewer plant property would be sold for an additional $150,000. He stated the City paid $300,000 for the land. They borrowed $4,000,000 and are putti’- $400,000 Into an escrow account against the bonds. He noted t1 building fund balance Is about $2,000,565. Goetten noted they are using the Interest to buy down the bonds. Jabbour stated they essentially were able to borrow money at a lower rate than the City could get on Its investments because of the City's excellent credit rating. He noted If the building fund ware used, the rating could change for additional bond sales. He noted that only 10% of the bond amount can be put aside to service the bonds. Goetten stated that they were concerned about the future of Minnesota Legislation and they wanted to be well prepared If the State were to further reduce revenues available to cities. Flke asked if these numbers are contingent upon both the sale of the sewer plant site and the Crystal Bay site this year. Callahan noted that if the properties were retained for park land, money would be used from the building fund to offset the difference. MINUTES OF THE ORONO 1991 BUDGET HEARING - DECEMBER 4, 1991 Weed reiterated that the annual service on the bonds Is $232,000. Moorse explainea that is the amount that the Council has indicated that will be levied on an annual basis, which is a 1.75 levy for the debt servic-. . Callahan noted the interest rate on the bonds was 6.175% average. Moorse explained that the total gross tax levy is increasing 14.5%. He noted with the aids they will receive, the net tax levy increase will be 10.3%. Weed asked what HACA stands for. Moorse stated it reflects homestead and agricultural credits from the State. Moorse stated they are receiving less in fiscal disparity than before. He reviewed the handout reflecting the effect of the tax levy on homes. He explained that the estimated market value is the value the assessor assigns, the tax capacity is the taxable value on that property, and the tax capacity rate is the percentage that is applied to the taxable value to determine the actual tax for a parcel. He stated the tax law changed in 1991, reducing the taxable value of higher valued homes and shifting a portion of the property tax burden to lower valued homes. Flke asked what governmental body determined the tax capacity for 1992. Moorse stated that State law determines that amount. Weed noted this is only Orono's portion of the tax capacity rate. Moorse compared Ore with other metropolitan cities with over 2,000 in population He noted there are 95 cities in this category and Orono ranks fifth in lowest tax capacity rate at 11.865%. The average rate is 21.248%. PUBLIC COMMENTS Mayor Peterson asked If there were any other questions from the publ1c. Vicki McKinney, 3399 Crystal Bay Road, asked what the procedure Is If they do not agree with their assessed value. Callahan stated that each spring the Board of Review is held to review complaints or comments by residents on their assessed value. He noted Council Is limited by law as to what they can change. Jabbour noted It would be best to contact the assessor now and do homework on neighboring property values. _ _ __ _A.. MINUTES OF THE ORONO 1991 BUDGET HEARING - DECEMBER 4, 1991 Fike noted that once the review process has been opened, the assessor may determine if the value is too high or too low. Callahan noted there is an item in the budget which reflects a reduction in revenue referring to the levy for lost tax receipts due to abatements. He suggested that if the homeowner did not , wish to appear before the Board, she write a letter stating her objection and move onto the County level of appeal. Goetten noted that it would be best to contact Rolf Erickson, City Assessor, to answer any questions she may have on the procedure or dates of appeal. Weed felt the budget was good and was glad to see the Council hold the cost down. Fike asked when and how the City would divest in the Crystal Bay faci1ities site. Jabbour noted the unofficial feeling of the Council was that it should not be sold. Dr. Vongries, Park Commission Member, stated that the Park Commission is planning to hold a public meeting to discuss the fate of the property. 1992 BUDGET It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt the 1992 budget as presented, conditioned upon review of Public Works expenditures. Moorse pointed out the Council needs to adopt two resolutions, one to certify the levy and one to adopt the budget In detail. Jabbour withdrew his motion. Kuehn noted that the budget can be amended throughout the year If needed. He noted that capital items for Public Works would need further Council approval as they come up throughout the year. FINAL 1991 TAX LEVY - RESOLUTION #3050 It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution #3050, approving the final 1991 tax levy collectible In 1992 as follows: i • • MINUTES OF THE ORONO 1991 BU09IT HIARXNfl - DECEM9IR 4| i§§i General fund Special assessments Lost tax receipts due to abatements 1990 sewer Improvement bond 1985 sewer Improvement bonds 1980 sewer, water, street Improvement bond 1982 Bonds of other goverment units H.R.A. building bond G.O. G.O. G.O. $1.644,831 5,630 6,220 50,000 16,800 5,500 232,400 $1,961,381 and herr?by directs the City Clerk to transmit a certified copy of the resolution to the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Ayes 4, nays 0. 1992 BUDGET - RESOLUTION #3049 It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Goetten, Resolution #3049, adopting the 1992 budget in the amounts: to adopt following ESTIMATED REVENUES Taxes - General - Special levy City assessments - Tax abatements “ Penalties and interest Licenses and permits Intergovernraenta1 Charge for services Fines and forfeits Interest Income Other Transfers from other funds $1,644,831 5,630 6,220 9,999 115,000 185,600 791,960 76,000 46,500 19,700 123,450 $3,024,890 APPROPRIATED EXPENDITURES General government Public safety Street maintenance Parks and recreation Recycling program Engineering - unallocated Reimbursable expenditures Special projects - contingency Transfers to other funds $ 649,970 1,611,430 493,260 55,140 67,320 4. 950 36,000 44,020 62,800 $3,024,890 Ayes 4. nays 0. • • i MINUTES OF THE ORONO 1991 BUDGET HEARING - DECEMBER 4, 1991 ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adjourn the 1991 Budget Public Hearing Meeting at 7:50 p.m. Ayes 4, nays 0. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk •v' . r MINUTI8 OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER ROLL The Council met on the above date with the fol lowing'*014^0^ present: Mayor Barbara Peterson, CounciImembers Gabriel JabboCn*«( Edward Callahan, J. Diann Goetten and Mary Butler. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, City Attorney Tom Barrett, City Engineer Glenn Cook and City Recorder Terl Naab. Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. CONSENT AGENDA Goetten removed Items 19 and 22. Jabbour removed Item 14. Butler added Items 5 and 10. Goetten requested that Item 5 not be added. Callahan added Item 12 and removed It'^ms 16, 17, 20 and 23. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to approve the Consent Agenda, with the exception of Item numbers 14, 16, 17, 19, 20, 22 and 23 and with the addition of Items 10 and 12. Ayes 5, nays 0. Motions for all Items adopted by consent agenda will be Included in the minutes In their respective numerical order. (*#2 & *#3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Council held on November 25, 1991. Ayes 5, nays 0. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to approve the minutes of the public hearing of the Orono Council held on November 20, 1991 regarding the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project. Ayes 5. nays 0. PUBLIC COMMENTS Nell Castagna, 1890 Shadywood Road, Environmental Director of the Lake Minnetonka Lake Owners' Association, stated ho attended this meeting because he thought the DNR was to present a proposal on the proposed boat launch on Maxwell Bay. He stated the Lake Owners' Association Is against the launch site for many reason, some of which are: environmental, ovei—crowding, safety, parking and zoning Issues. He urged the Council to conduct a public hearing to allow citizen Input. Moorse explained that the DNR Is planning to have a conceptual plan by mid-December, and Is planning a public meeting to be held In mid-January of 1992. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 9. 1991 PUBLIC COMMENTS - CONT. Jabbour felt that by the time it was to be reviewed by the Counci If they may be reviewing the issue in a past tense as the option to buy the land expires mid-January. He suggested they notify the DNR to present their proposal to the Council at a scheduled meeting. Goetten asked if the DNR could legally go ahead without Council approval. Callahan felt that since the implementation of ordinances protect Orono may involve legal action on the part of Orono defense on the part of DNR, it should be discussed in executive session. to or an Barrett explained the DNR can certainly buy land without the approval of the City, but it may be using State funds for public purposes which may be in conflict with City ordinances. Mayor Peterson directed staff to publish a public hearing to be held on January 6, 1992 at 7:00 p.m. in the Orono Link. Callahan suggested the Council remind the DNR that tney can hold their own public hearing prior to the purchase of the property. Jabbour suggested that Gene Strommen and the LMCD Board members be notified of the meeting. Ken Zullo, 3160 North Shore Drive, clarified that he just found out about the project and was very concerned about many aspects of it. Butler explained that staff has met with the DNR, who explained what they are proposing on Maxwell Bay, but nothing has been submitted to the Council in writing as of yet. Mayor Peterson assured Zullo that one of the Council's main concerns was the safety issue. Zullo reviewed that he had heard the launch would have a 1-lane access. Goetten confirmed that the property is substandard and is zoned residential. Butler stated that the launch would be in a lake-use zone that the DNR has determined does not need additional public launching faci11 ties. Jabbour advised that he has sent a letter to the LMCD asking them not to act on any issues regarding land use without receiving Input from the City first. Ho suggested citizens lobby the LMCD. Callahan also suggested lobbying the DNR. MINUTES OF THE REQULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETXNO - DECEMBER 0. 1001 PUBLIC COMMENTS - CONT. CastaQna directed that the DNR's position is that It will be a minimum launch for fishing boats, with only 25 parking spots, to enable them to reach their goal of 700 parking spots with access to the lake. He felt the proposal would set a negative precedent within the Community. Paul Schueller, 1280 Spruce Place, asked what the Council's position was on the proposal. Mayor Peterson reviewed that the Council has not received any proposal on the launch, but felt the concensus of the Council was In opposition of the proposal. Callahan reiterated that they are not sure what they can legally do or prohibit. Jim Rivers, 1440 Shoreline Drive, asked who has the right to rezone the property. Butler noted the DNR may be able to rezone without the City's approval. Goetten directed them to review the situation of Hennepin County Parks and land within Minnetrlsta, where the City was against the purchase of land for park land. She reviewed that the last right a City has Is to deny such a proposal, and the Legislature took that right from cities. She noted that they should lobby support of surrounding cities. Rivers noted that If a private land owner were to ask for a rezoning of such a property for such a proposal, they would be turned down and felt the DNR should also be denied. Callahan stated that Orono is vulnerable to this type of proposal as It has the most open land around the lake, and felt that the next Issue may be Big Island. Jabbour felt that the best way to stop the DNR would be to prove that the proposal Is not advantageous to the public because of health and welfare Issues. He stated that the DNR Is breaking all the rules of the shoreland regulations, which the DNR has Implemented. Lee Fishbeck, 3135 North Shore Drive, asked If a possible accidents due to the proposal In that area requested. study of has been Mayor Peterson agreed that documentation will be asked for and thanked everyone for coming on behalf of this Issue. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 9, 1991 (#4) #1691 & #1702 CITY OF LONG LAKE. 130 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD NORTH - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION #3051 Jeffrey Rons wat present to represent the applicants. Moorse explained that this is a request for preliminary subdivision approval, PRO development and comprehensive plan amendment. Roos explained that a preliminary grading and drainage plan has been submitted and reviewed by staff. He noted that the site is difficult to develop because of the uneven elevations Another issue to be addressed is access to the property to the north via the outlot. He stated that he has discussed this issue with the Long Lake Council, which they agreed had been discussed previously. They recalled that discussions occurred that if the property to the north were to be developed as single family with a maximum of 7-8 residences, an access would be considered by Orono. Goetten reiterated that those discussions regarding the access were Informal and nothing was ever stated as far as access in the final compromise. She had no problem with pedestrian access and access to the lift station on the northern portion of the roadway. Jabbour felt Long Lake is looking for guidelines to be placed within the covenant. Barrett felt they would be better off to decide a maximum number of units at this point. Mayor Peterson recalled conversations regarding access but noted a maximum number of units was never determined. Callahan suggested they not include a maximum number of units allowed to access the property and follow direction of the resolution, recognizing the fact that the outlot would be solely for access purposes to the lift station. If at a later oate they request further access, the developer can apply to the Council for consideration. Butler stated that she felt that there should be no vei^ir.ular access off of Outlot B to any property to the north. She thought that pedestrian traffic was an excellent idea. Roos asked that the Council set a maximum number of units allowed to access off the Wolf property onto the proposed subdivision to avoid steps in the process in the future. Goetten explained they have no site plan for development of the Wolf property to rovlow and folt setting a mdxlfnuin nuinber of allowed units to access should wait. Butler agreed. r MINUTI8 OP THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 9, 1991 #1691 & #1702 - CONT. Jabbour felt that they should make known to future Councils their policy on development of this property by setting a maximum allowed to access from the Wolf property to the north. Butler reitated that at the last meeting, it was clear that the Council was opposed to allowing through traffic from Highway 12 to Orono Orchard Road. Goetten felt they had a responsibility to the citizens of Orono who live in the area to ensure there is not a major traffic Impact. Butler stated that they do have control over development of this property, but have no control over development of property to the north. She felt that Wolf should obtain access on his own. Roos felt that restricting future development from the north to access through the property was putting them at a disadvantage and stated that the road will be capable of handling much more than the current proposed development. Mayor Peterson agreed with Jabbour and felt they should set a maximum number. Callahan noted that a maximum number would not bind future Councils any more than than the number 0 would as the covenants can be changed. He stated that he did not recall any conversation regarding granting access to the Wolf property, other than denying such. Moorse explained that it may be beneficial to set a maximum number that both Councils agree upon, so in the future if additional access is proposed, the Councils would have a number, that both had agreed upon, to commence from, rather than start all over again. Goetten commented that the Wolf property is not a part of the property being subdivided, and noted that discussions regarding access were at informal meetings. Mabusth noted that Rowlette, Planning Commission member, asked that the height of monuments be restricted within the covenants. Jabbour noted he had received calls on restrictions of outside storage on the properties. Butler stated that she would like to see language incorporated within the covenants limiting removal of mature trees. Mabusth explained that the roadway has been moved closer to the pond In order to save a mature stand of trees, and also because of the higher elevation at the east side of the road bed. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 9, 1991they have tried to be sensitive to the Goetten noted the Council has appreciated#1691 & #1702 - CONT.Roos explained that neighbors’ concerns, their efforts.Butler directed comments to the proposed covenants. She noted that in Covenants #3 (B) it suggests thatextend more than 6’ above grade level. She suggested that be reduced to 3'. niitler noted Covenant #8 be filled in to read "not to exceed 3 1/2 feet in height" to be in keeping with the allowable fence height. Callahan asked that condition #1 be explained in regards to "monetary damages". Barrett explained that this provides for the City to get an injunction whether or not there are monetary damages. Roos commented on condition #9. home occupations, and asked which would bo allowed. Barrett noted that home occupations which definitely with the residential atmosphere of the ^^hborhood conflict with the covenants proposed. He noted that ^*^® been granted an extension from the Municipal Board until late January to come to acceptable terms for development. He suggested that Council adopt the resolution ^V^g^^nesto^^continue the subdivision process and establishes guidelines for the development of covenants. Mabusth noted that Page 6, Item 4 and Page 7, Item 9, need to be changed to read "Orono Orchard Road" rather than Orono Oaks Drive. Callahan asked what condition #9 meant. Barrett explained it is establishing control over Orono O'^chard Road, which will remain within Orono. so as not to create doubt regarding maintenance of said road. Butler suggested the elimination of everything other than the first sentence of condition #2 on Page 6 of the resolution. It was moved by Callahan, secondod #3051. with the appropriate amefidr.ients as follows. to eliminate everything but the first sentence of Condition #2 on Page 6; to amend Condition #9 to more clearly indicate the intent of the condition; and to change Conditions #4 and #9 to J"®®^ orchard Road rather than Orono Oaks Drive. Ayes 3, nays _ Jabbour and Peterson voted nay because they felt of units from future development to the north should be defined. M1NUTI9 OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 9, 1991(#5) #1697 JIM RIVERS, 1440 SHORELINE DRIVE - AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCESJ1m Rivers was present.- RESOLUTION #3052Moorse explained this Is an application for after-the-fact variances to approve a deck constructed 13 years age without a permit, which replaced an existing stone patio.Goetten Informed Rivers that from this point on the Council wanted him to know that at anytime Improvements are proposed on lakeshore property, approval must be obtained prior to commencement of the work. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Butler, to adopt Resolution #s3052, application #1697 for Jim Rivers, 1440 Shoreline Drive, to approve aft ‘•he-fact variances for construction of a deck. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*#6) #1699 MICHAEL RENARD, 1185 TONKAWA ROAD - RENEWAL VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3053 It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to adopt Resolution #3053 for application #1699 for Michael Renard of 1185 Tonkawa Road, to approve renewal variances to allow construction of an addition to his existing residence. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#7) #1701 PHYLLIS B. SPRAGUE, 3340 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCE Phyllis Sprague was present for this application. Moorse explained this Is an application for variances requesting a non—conforming residential use to be allowed on a commercially zoned property. Butler noted that the Planning Commission approved the use as an accessory structure and as long as the applicant was aware that the structure could never be used as a permanent dwelling, she felt the proposal was acceptable. She noted the property could never be sold as two Individual dwelling units. Sprague noted that the parcels would be legally combined. Callahan asked what the property Is zoned. Mabusth noted It Is zoned B-2. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 9, 1991 #1701 - CONT. Callahan stated that this Is a non-conforming use and the Council may not have the legal right to grant approval of such a use. He noted this land Is adjacent to two marinas. He also noted that even after the combination of the lots. the property is . substandard and they would be allowing two principal residences to remain on the parcel. Goetten agreed and deferred the question to Barrett. Barrett agreed that the Statute prevents the Council from granting a use variance. He noted approval of this application may present difficulties in other applications. Mabusth noted the applicant is requesting the rezoning of the two parcels. She noted the property owner to the west is interested In also rezoning. Jabbour stated he has no problem with what the applicant is proposing, however he noted they may not be legally able to allow the use. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Callahan, to table application #1701 for Phyllis B. Sprague at 3340 North Shore Drive, to allow the City Attorney time to submit an opinion on the matter. Ayes 5, nays 0. r#8) #1703 EDWIN J. & TRACEE GIBBS. VACATION OF CLARA AVENUE - RESOLUTION #3054 Edwin and Tracee Gibbs were present, also present for the application. Ralpn and Ruth Knox were Moorse explained that the applicants are requesting vacation of unimproved right-of-way that the City has determined they do not need for a roadway. The adjacent property owners have requested vacation and the property be reverted back to them. The Public Works Director is requesting a drainage and utility easement along the property line. Callahan asked If the vacation could include all property but that requested for the drainage and utility easement, which has already been dedicated to the City. Barrett noted that the City wouldn’t necessarily have to give up the entire easement, but it may be more trouble to subtract the portion requested as drainage easement as It has never been defined. He noted he would look Into the tssue. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Goetten. to vacate the road except for the portion requested to be dedicated as drainage and utility easement, and if upon the advise of Counsel it is necessary to vacate the total road and acquire the necessary easements as a condition, the staff followup on such requirement. 8 MINUTES OF THE REOULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETXNO - DECEHSIR §, l§§i #1703 - CONT. Gibbs noted the people who think they own the area to be vacated are present, the Knoxes. The Knoxes had no problem with the proposal as presented by the . City. Callahan withdrew his motion. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to Resolution #3054, application #1703 for Edwin and Tracee for the vacation of Clara Avenue. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#9) CHRISTOPHER SMITH, 3650 CASCO AVENUE - REQUEST FOR FOUNDATION BUILDING PERMIT Chris and Mary Smith were present for this application. adopt G1 bbs Moorse permit permit needed. explained this Is a request for a foundation building because It was determined upon application for a building that an average lakeshore setback variance would be Butler noted the letter of request Indicates because of "lack of snow . . .", she felt the basic premise for the request has been null If led. Goetten noted a request like this has never been approved, that she could remember. M. Smith noted they have taken great steps to preserve the 12 maple trees on the property. She noted they have retained the services of Rainbow Trees who has advised that It would be best to have the heavy equipment on the property during the time period the trees are dormant and when the ground Is frozen so there Is less crushing of the roots. Goetten Indicated their request probably would be approved at the end of January. Smith noted the road restrictions are scheduled to go on mid- March which would delay construction. Jabbour noted the Council does not have any recourse approve the permit at that point. they Smith reviewed that prior to purchasing the property they met with Inspector Vang to find out If variances would be needed for construction. She noted their plan had been revised In order to comply with hardcover restrictions. She stated that If allowed to proceed and the^ were not granted approval, they would bear all costs for removal of the foundation. CHRISTOPHER SMITH, 3650 CASCO AVENUE - CONT. ikyfa MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 9, 1991 Gootten appreciated the applicants' concerns, but noted this type of request had never been allowed in the past. John Schulties, builder, noted that he would need more than a month to complete the foundation and backfilling work. He noted that if the trees are to be considered, the house should not be built within the coming year. Smith reiterated that after three meetings with staff, they were still not aware of the need for variance approval, and noted that Is why the application was not submitted earlier. Mabusth noted that Vang was never supplied with a copy of the plat map Indicating layout of adjacent platted lots. Smith noted it is an unusual property and he does not blame staff for the oversight. He stated that in conversations with the City, no one thought to look to the property to the north because they have a corridor to the lake with a dock for setback requirements. He noted that if the foundation is not started immediately, there will not be enough time to bring in the materials for construction. Butler stated they appreciated the applicants' efforts, but felt approval would be precedent setting and she noted she could not approve. Jabbour noted the Council does not have the power to reduce the steps to a variance application which are required by law. Smith asked If the code specifies "adjacent resident structure". Barrett explained the code specifically states the distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots", which would not allow for approval of the permit without variance approve 1. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Jabbour, to direct the request of Christopher Smith of 3650 Casco Avenue to the Planning Commission to follow the normal and prescribed course of events for a variance application. Ayes 5, nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT A) It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3055, with the appropriate changes, to be sent on to the appropriate governmental body regarding the repeal of the presidential pr<mary. Ayes 5, nays 0. B) It was moved by Jabbour, to draft a resolution to be sent to communities around Lake Minnetonka asking them to urge the LMCD to adopt a policy whereby actions will not be taken on shoreline issues without giving a 30 day notice to the affected city. 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - DICIMigR §i l§§! MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. JoEllen Hurr, LMCD representative. was present. She noted that she had talked with the DNR and has pushed them for a conceptual plan to be presented at a tentative meeting on December 19th at 10:00 to be held at the LMCD office. Hurr noted that the LMCD is still considering a lighting ordinance, and most cities felt that the LMCD should stick to governing the lake. Mabusth noted Orono does have a lighting ordinance in effect. Callahan felt they should express in writing their objection to the LMCD governing any portion of land use. Goetten felt a letter to the LMCD should be written explaining when an issue affecting the cities is before them, the LMCD should contact those affected cities. Hurr noted the LMCD has adopted a very stringent ordinance which will try to control the zebra mussel. She noted it is the ordinance which was first adopted by the Minnesota Lake Federation Group. Jabbour stated that the LMCD seems preoccupied with adoption of rules, but wanted to know what the consequences for breaking those rules are and who will enforce. Hurr noted they have incorporated consequences and they will need to enforce. She stated that the recently adopted ordinance controlling the spread of zebra mussel may be too stringent to enforce, but at least it is on the books if it is ever needed. Jabbour concurred with Hurr about the zebra mussel and felt that perhaps the cities should bypass the DNR and go directly to the Legislature. He noted funds should be designated for remedies and prevention of these exotic diseases. Hurr explained that other agencies will suffer from the spread of the zebra mussel. Hurr stated that the comprehensive plan Is currently being reviewed by the Systems Committee at the Metropolitan Council. Callahan noted they had not received a final draft. '•^r noted she would supply a copy of the draft. She noted a hearing would be held by the Systems Committee regarding the plan, but comments to date have been generally supportive. Jabbour suggested sending a formal response regarding snoreland regulations. the MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING ~ DECEMBER 9, 1991 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. Callahan noted a formal response had not been drafted yet, but one certainly should be composed and sent onto the appropriate agencies. . Jabbour asked Hurr’s opinion of Big Island and the comprehensive plan. Hurr felt that Orono's Comprehensive Plan does not clearly designate private use of the Island. She noted that old plat shows a public use. She stated that it would be difficult to convince the LMCD not to use the Island for public land If that Is the way It Is designated In the Comprehensive Plan. Jabbour stated that something should be done at the beginning of 1992. Hurr noted that the Council may rue the oay 1f they do not make the appropriate changes. Goetten noted that she does not want what happened In MInnetrlsta to happen In Orono. C) Goetten asked Mayor Peterson how their last meeting had gone. Mayor Peterson noted the meeting had been canceled and rescheduled. D) Mayor Peterson announced that Trinity Lutheran, St. and Calvin Presbytrlan churches will sponsoring a 2-day on crisis management. The public Is welcome. George, seminar E) Goetten announced that there would not be a Policy Technical Committee meeting In December. The next scheduled meeting Is January 15, 1992 at 5:30 p.m. F) Goetten noted the M.C.W.D. held a meeting last week on the clean water Issue. (#11) DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN VERSUS FICA FOR NON-PERA EMPLOYEES - RESOLUTION #3056 Moorse explained this Is an alternate deferred compensation plan for non-PERA employees, so the City does not have to be Involved In FICA. The benefit of this plan as opposed to FICA would be that the City would not have to pay their portion of the tax. He noted this type of plan would basically apply to seasonal- temporary personnel, of which the City currently does not employ many of this type of worker, but may In the futur-e. He noted that the City Is offered this option only once. He noted that the plan could be mandatory or optional at the discretion of the City. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MIETIN3 - DICIMIIR Si ISii DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN - CONT. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Mayor Peterson. to adopt Resolution #3056 authorizing the United States Conference of Mayors' (USCM) deferred compensation program to include all City of Orono employees, to enable the program to be used as an optional pension plan for Orono employees. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*#12) EXTENSION OF CONTRACT WITH STRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH FOR ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to enter Into a contract with Strgar-Roscoe-Fausch for additional consulting services for a cost not to exceed $5,000. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*#13) 1992 MEETING SCHEDULE It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to adopt the 1992 City meeting schedule and calendar. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#14) 1992 APPOINTMENTS - RESOLUTION #3060 Callahan asked why the auditor was changing. Moorse explained the firm merely changed its name. Callahan noted he Is not familiar with anyone on the Building Board of Appeals other than Maureen Bellows. He asked how these people are picked. Mabusth explained they are choosen because of their expertise in the building field. Butler suggested rotating the acting Mayor position to allow others a chance to serve. She proposed Goetten for the position. Butler noted there Is an additional "n" in Gerhardson as assistant weed Inspector. She noted that she should not solely be the representative to the Highway 12 Technical Committee. Goetten suggested they share the position. Jabbour suggested that other Committee members be listed in the appointment resolution, such as the HRA Committee, and Lake Use Committee. Goetten recalled that the depository must be voted on that evening. Moorse noted the newspaper must also be voted on. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3060 reappointing the official newspaper, the official bank, the depository and Investment vendor. Ayes 5, nays 0. r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 9, 1991 (*#15) PROSECUTING ATTORNEY CONTRACT It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to approve the agreement for a Joint Powers Agreement for Prosecution Services. Ayes 5, nays 0. . (#16) 1992 COMPENSATION ADJUSTMENT - RESOLUTION #3057 Callahan noted the adjustment is in keeping with the pay equity law. Moorse Indicated that Is correct. and there are three persons currently employed whose current pay is above the level the pay equity law provides for. He noted they have been limited in recent years in the amount of wage increase they received, to allow them to come Into compliance. He noted that basically for 1992 their salaries have been frozen. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3057 establishing salaries for City employees for 1992. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#17) AUTHORIZATION TO DISBURSE CITY FUNDS FOR CLAIMS RECEIVED Callahan noted the authority ought to be limited to payments or claims which are bills or statements received In the normal course of business. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to authorize the City Treasurer to disburse City funds in payment of bills or statements received In the normal course of business or City functions until the next scheduled Council meeting, and to present any bills for ratification at the January 13, 1992 meeting. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*#18) 1991 INTERFUND TRANSFERS AND LOAN PAYMENTS It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to approve the transfer, loan and special assessment payments effective December 31, 1991. Ayes 5, nays 0. (19) RECYCLING BID AWARD Moorse explained that the recycling company. Polka Dot, has gone out of business. He noted Gerhardson will be attending a meeting with the West Hennepin Recycling Committee to determine an alternative. He noted that two bids for 1992 wore received, one of which was from Polka Dot, and the other approximately double the first bid. He stated that a notice will be sent to all residents telling them of the change. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Butler, to reject the 1992 recy. Mng bids. Ayes 5, nays 0. MINUTIi OF THI REQULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 9, 1991(#20) 1992 CONTRACTS WITH LONG LAKECallahan noted the former contract allowed for a termination notice which had to be given by October 1. He noted the new contract allows the contract to run from January through December, and does not allow ample time for the other party to regroup in the event of termination. Jabbour felt notice of termination should be given prior to the adoption of the next year budget. Moorse explained this contract is only an interim contract, with the assumption that there will be many changes made to the contract for 1993. Butler suggested that "whereas, the contract for 1993 shall be agreed upon no later than October 1, 1992", be added. She asked Sullivan about a conversation that he had with the Long Lake Council regarding the price for police coverage, and the fact that they are already short funds for 1992. Sullivan explained that Long Lake had arbitrarily designated $220,000 in the preliminary budget for police service, which allowed between 1 1/2 to 2 additional persons. He tried to have them conceptualize 2 persons rather than the 1 1/2. He noted one Council member suggested they transfer money from the legal fund to the police fund, which resulted in a 2-2 vote. He explained they decided to stay with the original figure with the understanding that they would receive 40 hours a week for the first few months, and starting around March 1st, they would be allocated 80 hours additional a week. Butler reiterated that she wanted the price of the contract known up front, anc! wanted it known that Long Lake has set its budget lower than the contract price. Sullivan noted that there was a lack of communication in the previous year. Ho noted the coverage was changed during the year to reflect the price Long Lake was paying. Jabbour stated that because of newspaper coverage, the citizens believed there was a dispute between the two cities because of a $5,000 bill, which he noted is not a major issue to him. He noted his major concern is how the City can run efficiently based on contract cities decisions. He noted that Long Lake was to budget for 2 1/2 additional persons for 1992, consequently the Council approved hiring of additional personnel. He noted now Long Lake is below even 2 additional persons. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 9, 19911992 CONTRACTS WITH LONG LAKE - CONT.Sullivan noted that in negotiations prior to the authorization to hire additional personnel, Long Lake had reduced their request for additional manpower. He noted at that time they asked the price for less personnel there was no contract in effect, thl^efore making it fair game to renegotiate the amount of additional personnel. He stated at the Long Lake Council ^eeting^ Long Lake asked him if he would seek to do things as cost effective as possible, and he indicated to them he would. Long Lake also asked if additional manpower and time was required, would Orono notify them prior to the service, and he Indicated he would do that. Jabbour noted the Long Lake budget is tight, as is and he Just wants to make sure that Long Lake will be able to pay its portion for service. Sullivan felt it would be beneficial to have multi-year contracts. Callahan noted the previous year's contract provided that after the expiration of the contract. Long Lake would pay costs ^whether or not they terminated. The current provides that Long Lake pay only if they terminate. that the City of Orono has Incurred these extra costs because of the contract, and he felt Long Lake should pay no matter who terminates the contract. Moorse indicated he thought the language had been changed and will review the contract again. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt the ’ contract with the appropriate amendments, as discussed at previously during the meeting. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*#21) CITY ADMINISTRATOR VACATION REQUEST It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to allow Administrator, Ron Moorse, to ^ake ®26 and FridayTuesday. December 24th and on Thursday. December 26 and Friday, December 27th. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#22) SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS TO COUNTY ROAD 15 - RESOLUTION #3059 Goetten wanted to know what type of Improvements are proposed. Butler explained the County is going to do a consider the upgrade of the existing roadbed, and only end up wider in areas where turn lanes are necessary. Goetten noted that the County Road currently and she will never allow for further expansion of the roadbed. Ji MINUTI8 OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 9, 1991SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS TO COUNTY ROAD 15 - CONT.It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3059 requesting, in the interest of public safety, that Hennepin County conduct a feasibility study regarding the creation of passing and turning lanes on County Road 15 within . the City of Orono while maintaining the roadway as a two lane road. Ayes 5, nays 0.(#23) RESTRICTION OF THE USE OF THE BUILDING CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to table the resolution restricting the use of the Building Capital Outlay Fund. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*#24) LICENSES - RESOLUTION #3058 It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to approve the following licenses: Northwest Tonka Lions Club - Gambling Permit - Resolution #3058 at Navarre Lanes - 35^5 Shoreline Drive William Wear - Off-sale non-intoxicating malt liquor license Orono Self Service - 2160 Wayzata Blvd Wayzata Country Club - Club liquor license 200 Wayzata Blvd Residential Kennel Licenses: G. James Spinner, 940 North Arm Dr Wayne & Gayle Carrier, 1376 North Arm Dr Jane Kline/Steve Bell, 4455 West Branch Rd Marilyn Pickard, 4607 Watertown Rd Maxwell Alvord, 960 Brown Rd N Suzanne Fackler, 3700 Togo Rd Ayes 5, nays 0. (*#25) BILLS It was moved by Callahan, of the All Funds Account. seconded by Butler, to approve payment Ayes 5, nays 0. ft « * Rt Rr « Moorse asked the Council to consider the date to be set for the Board of Review as April 29, 1992. Council noted they would officially schedule the meeting at the January 6, 1992 meeting. r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 9, 1991 ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to adjourn the regular meeting of the Council at 10:15 p.m. Ayes 5, nays 0. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin. City Clerk PUBLIC HEARING HELD REGARDING DNR'S PROPOSED LAKE A ON MAXWELL BAY ' ORONO CITY COUNCIL - JANUARY 6, 1992 C/ry ROLL ''r The Orono Council met on the above date with the followinff' members present: Mayor Barbara Peterson. Councilraerabers Gabriel Jabbour, Edward Callahan and J. Diann Goetten. Mary Butler was absent. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, Building & Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, and City Recorder Teri Naab. Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. INTRODUCTION Mayor Peterson introduced Mr. David English, Public Affairs Coordinator for the DNR. She noted he will be reporting to the Commissioner of the DNR on the input from this public hearing, but noted that the public could not expect any answers from the DNR at that point. Mayor Peterson read a letter from Gordon Kimball of the DNR submitted to City Administrator Moorse (attached as Exhibit A). She noted the letter sets a public open house for Tuesday, January 21, 1992 from 4:00 to 8:00 p.m. in the Orono Education Link regarding the proposed public access. The letter also noted that the DNR has sought input from all interested parties including surrounding neighbors and elected officials concerned with the access. Mayor Peterson introduced City Administrator Moorse and asked him to give a brief history of the proposal. Moorse explained that in 1983, the Governor's Task Force Study looked at the use of Lake Minnetonka and public acce* ;. The study revealed a need for additional parking around the lake for the general public. The DNR classified parking in two categories: reliable and unreliable They determined 700 reliable parking spaces were needed around the lake. The lake was also divided into 5 zones, and the MaxweJ Bay site is in Zone 1. Moorse reviewed a chart which shows a goal of 139 reliable spaces, with 60 current reliable and 109 unreliabit; parking spaces available. Criteria for a reliable parking space is jt must be within 1,500 feet from the public access site .ind must be owned by the public. Moorse noted that there has not been much planning with regards to this issue since 1983 and this is the first proposal from the DNR with regards to adding parking spaces on Lake Minnetonka. He noted it originally came about when a property owner went to the DNR and asked if the DNR wished to purchase the property. Moorse reviewed the site which is located on Countv Road 51 and PUBLIC HEARING HELD REGARDING DNR’S PROPOSED LAKE ACCESS ON MAXWELL BAY ORONO CITY COUNCIL - JANUARY 6, 1992 is less than 2 acres, spaces on the location. The DNR is proposing 20 to 30 parking Goetten reiterated that the DNR had been invited to the public hearing and on Friday prior to the meeting, the City was informed that the DNR would only send a public relations person to relay comments back to the DNR. She stated that statements in Mr. Kimball's letter indicating that the DNR had discussed this project with local elected officials are untrue. She noted that the next opportunity that they will be allowed to review this issue with the DNR will be just a few days prior to the expiration of the purchase agreement. She noted this issue impacts the entire City and surrounding communities. Jabbour acknowledged JoEllen Hurr, LMCD representative for Orono; Steve Smith, State Representative; and Marge Gasch who has been working very hard for the City for many years. Jabbour expressed frustration with the DNR. He noted the letter exaggerated and he felt there was no use for a public relations representative to be present but felt someone should have been present to review a proposed site plan. He noted that the planned public meeting by the DNR on January 21st, with the option expiring on the 30th, •' not a true process of democracy, but rather a ritual, of which ,.ne City should not be a party. He felt they are short- circuiting the process. He stated that the DNR has not met with the parties which they suggested that they have met with and have exaggerated the truth substantially. He suggested that this parcel of land is only 1 out of 5 or 6 to obtain the DNR's goal for Zone 1. He noted the numbers in the survey are outdated and when the study was done, neither rr Ifoil nor zebra mussels were a threat to the lake. Jabbour explained that the City doesn't have much to say in regards to the DNR using the property and noted the use conflicts with the local municipal code. He urged homeowners to look for a broader base and suggested that the issue concerns homeowners surrounding the entire lake, not just residents of Orono. Callahan noted that it is true that the LMCD Subcommittee originally approved the plan as submitted by the DNR, but subsequently the LMCD decided that they should hold hearings on the matter before the DNR completed its acquisition in order to reach some conclusions which might be helpful to everyone Callahan opined that the LMCD’s long-range development plan which was recently adopted by the LMCD and approved by the Metropolitan Council addressed the matter of 700 car parking around the lake with access points, and regardless of what is mentioned in the written portion of the plan, there was a great deal of discussion about that program and its concept during the course of the r PUBLIC HEARING HELD REGARDING DNR'S PROPOSED LAKE ACCESS ON MAXWELL BAY ORONO CITY COUNCIL - JANUARY 6, 1992 Callahan opined that the LMCD's long-range development plan which was recently adopted by the LMCD and approved by the Metropolitan Council addressed the matter of 700 car parking around the lake with access points, and regardless of what is mentioned in the written portion of the plan, there was a great deal of discussion about that program and its concept during the course of the development stage. He felt that the plan provides that th« acquisition of access points on the lake to meet the 700 car parking spaces would be the subject of a program which is to be developed and coordinated by the LMCD. He noted that he DNR had signed off on the long-range plan, and in earlier days, even had input on it. Callahan stated that at the tim-^ the plan was developed, the representatives of the cities with an interest in this area of the plan were told that the LMCD and the DNR had reached some understanding r.s to what was meant by the 700 parking space requirement. Thereby, the DNR and the LMCD had agreed that since the first studies had been made, that the LMCD would devise a plan for the lake and work with surrounding communities to arrive at a comprehensive solution to this problem. The current activity with the DNR has been spurred by an individual wanting to sell his house and the DNR appeared to be an available source of money. Callahan felt that the LMCD should go to the DNR who they had reached some compromise with in the past, and redefine the plan for the lake in regards to the parking around the Lake. Goeften explained that the Council is taking thii: i.ssue very seriously and called for an executive session to be held following the next scheduled Council meeting. Mayor Peterson noted to the public that the Council is on their side with regards to this issue. She stated that she felt the purpose of the DNR was to help preserve, not destroy, the natural resources. She felt the proposed access is a very costly venture. She felt that problems will be compounded by adding boat density to the lake and traffic problems on surrounding roads. Jabbour introduced Gene Stroramen, Executive Director of the LMCD and Duane Marcus of Wayzata, Board Member of the LMCD. Jabbour explained that in Minnesota the DNR is charged with managing its resources, the MPCA is responsible for disasters, and there is not an Environmental Protection Aoency (BPA) to protect the environment. He noted that the *MCD should be charged with this responsibility. PUBLIC HEARING HELD REGARDING DNR'S PROPOSED LAKE ACCESS ON MAXWELL BAY ORONO CITY COUNCIL - JANUARY 6, 1992 Don Germanson, President of the Lake Minnetonka Lakeshore Owners Association (LMLOA), explained that within their membership, they have identified lawyers who may be able to assist Orono in its fight against this project. He noted that the DKR appears not to want to work with the LMLOA. He explained that he and Denny Meyer just returned from the Brainard area where they gave a presentation on milfoil. He noted that he grew up in Wisconsin on a lake which was infested with milfoil. He noted that area reacted to milfoil after it was too late to stop it. The same is true for Lake Minnetonka. He noted the key is to be ahead of the spread of any of the exotics. Germanson reviewed a flyer which was distributed to all in attendance which covered the following issues in regards to this project: environment, overcrowding, safety, parking, zoning and tax spending. He reviewed a list of lakes within Minnesota which currently have been infested with milfoil. He then reviewed a list of now money collected from boat licenses and gas tax is spent by the DNR. He noted the average amount spent per household is approximately $21.40, of which nearly $10.00 is dedicated for access purposes. Approximately one-third of the $1.05 spent for "fish and wildlife" programs is spent for the eradication ot exotics. He noted that is nearly 30 times the amount cf money dedicated for access than that for p’^wv^n^-ion of the spread of exotics. Germanson noted that the Hennepin County boat launch on North Shore Drive has the proper signage posted, and the DNR's launch on Halstad's Bay has very .little signage with a "no parking" sign posted. He stated that Wisconsin has now found it necessary to charge a launch fee to cover costs involved with these accesses. Kent Carlson, 3498 North Shore Drive, stated that milfoil could not be stopped in time and zebra mussels probably cannot be stopped either. He felt that density could be kept at a minimum. He suggested that a launching fee be assessed to cover required inspections to prevent the spread of milfoil and other undesirables. He suggested that the DNR look at the Advance Machine site in Spring Park for a possible launch. Carlson asked if low areas of the lake and dock areas have been deducted from the calculations to reflect a true ratio of boats to water densities. Jabbour noted that the Council has addressed every one of those issues. They have suggested that a reduction in net density be considered by utilizing commercial land, such as Gayles Marina, which is for sale. He stated that the DNR does not care about density, and indicated that the DNR lacks a comprehensive plan for development of parking and access around the lake. He urged the citizens to call the LMCD to force the DNR to develop d comprehensive plan and thorough study about the issue of launches. PUBLIC HEARING HELD REGARDING DNR'S PROPOSED LAKE ACCESS ON MAXWELL BAY ORONO CITY COUNCIL - JANUARY 6, 1992 r Carlson suggested that marinas would be happy to rent space to fulfill the requirement of parking spaces. Callahan noted he is not an advocate of the LMCD s long-range development plan, basically because the plan does not put the LHCD in a "protector of the lake" position. He stated, in fairness to the LMCD, they have attempted to take into account the fact that parts of the lake are unusable. It doesn't go as far as it arguably could in relation to milfoil. He noted the LMCD plan does propose that as th number of boats increase on the lake, the LMCD will cause restrictions to be put on the lake. Neil Castagna, Environmental Director for the LMLOA, pointed out that there are basically three representatives to the LMCD pr0SQHt at the meeting. He stated that the only people that the DNR wants to work with is the LMCD, so it is imperative that citizens from other communities contact their local elected officials to find out how your LMCD representative plans to vote on this issue. He indicated that the LMLOA worked very hard to get the Big Island program taken out of the long-range plan, and is working very hard to make sure that the residents of the lake are heard on the access ramp issue. Castagna disclosed that after attending several conferences, he is convinced that milfoil could totally be eradicated from Minnesota for approximately $8,000,000. He noted however that at a rate of $1.05 out of every $21.40, it is not going to get done. He indicated that the public has the right to be on the lake, however, until the DNR comes up with a policy to fight exotics, he felt it is irresponsible on their part to add more accesses on to any lake in this State without an environmental program and answers on how they will fight the environmental problems on these lakes. Harry Sweatt, 3225 Bohns Point Lane, stated his property would become the designated parking lot for this access. He stated that the DNR is not accountable to the citizens because they are not voted into office and the citizens have no influence over their budget. S)f00t.t asked how much demand for parking spaces would this parcel create. He felt that it may create a demand for 40 spaces while only providing 30 spaces. He also asked the Council if the police would be able to patrol the additional unauthorized parked vehicles on Bohns Point and use of private property for a "guaranteed parking space". Callahan noted that those issues have been asked of the DNR and the DNR has not provided any answers. PUBLIC HEARING HELD REGARDING DNR'S PROPCSED LAKE ACCESS ON MAXWELL BAY ORONO CITY COUNCIL - JANUARY 6, 1992 Sweatt opposed the feeling that there is nothing that can be done to stop the project. He noted that passive resistance is absolutely deadly. He explained that the DNR should be required to provide an environmental impact study as any citizen proposing the same type of project would be required to submit. Goetten assured Sweatt that the Council would fight against the project and noted they have considerable resources to do so. Sweatt suggested that the citizens are inclined to turn the problem over to elected officials, but they alone cannot solve the problem. He stated the citizens must get irate and let the other entities involved know it. Mrs. Erler, 3448 North Shore Drive, noted her property is mid­ point between the Hennepin County access and the parcel proposed as the DNR access. She noted that indeed parking spills over from the Hennepin County access launch, and indeed they climb all over personal property and get irate when told to leave. She noted that the police will answer calls on trespassing, but if the person has left the private property when the police arrive, nothing can be done. She stated the people are coming and going at all hours of the day and night. Brier noted that many accidents have happened because of the lake being overcrowded, but not many are reported to the public. Vern Hauge, Mayor of Tonka Bay, noted he is irate by the arrogance of boards in spending taxpayers' money. He stated that attitude is evident with Heimepin County taking a big chunk of land for parks. He resents the ability of property owners to sell to the DNR, and the DNR's ability to purchase any property they wish with taxpayer money. Hauge directed Representative Smith to draft legislation to curtail funds designated for the DNR as they do not deserve the funds they receive. He felt the funds should be designated to fight exotics. Hauge charged the DNR with making the communities spend excessive amounts of money to adopt the DNR shoreland regulations, and then the DNR has the audacity to break their own ordinances. Hauge commissioned the citizens to help their Council instead of criticizing them. John Dudley, 3250 North Shore Drive, stated he used to live at 3260 North Shore Drive and can attest to the danger of entering and exiting the property from County Road 51. PUBLIC HEARING HELD REGARDING DNR'S PROPOSED LAKE ACCESS ON MAXWELL BAY ORONO CITY COUNCIL - JANUARY 6, 1992 Mark Brenneman, General Manager of North Shore Drive Marina and a resident of Spring Park, explained that Hennepin County Highway Department closed a curb cut to the marina due to a safety concern. He felt citizens should contact the Highway Department as the Highway Department will not allow additional use of the access to the property. He stated the DNR is a very mismanaged group. Jennifer Dotzenroth, 3225 Casco Circle, n-^ted that if this issue is any indication of how entities that govern manage the lakes, citizens should be very concerned. She felt that citizens of Lake Minnetonka should set a precedence and take this issue to the State level if needed. Pat Wolf, resident of Medina and lives on Lake Independence, She indicated that she is currently the vice president of Minnesota Lake Management Federation and has served on every task force involving the milfoil issue. She stated she was instrumental in getting legislation introduc;ed making it a misdemeanor to transport milfoil, which the DNR never supported. After a year, the DNR was forced to comply by doing road checks. She stated that legislation is currently being written with the input from the Steering Committe': which will try to better protect the lakes, not just close accesses as some persons believe. She advised that these organizations need support from the public and directed property owners to be responsibJe and get civically involved. Debbie Brenneman, Spring Park, charged that State Legislators are not being held accountable for anything that happens on or around the lake. She suggested contacting the Highway Department, State Legislators, LMCD, and even the Governor to express local concerns. She stated that after reading the mandate by the DNR, she concurred that marinas and rental slips should be counted as public access. She noted there is no dollar figure attached to access in the mandate. She felt that if the local officials had stopped what was happening at Lakeside Marina, they would not even be there for the meeting. Jabbour directed that credit should be given to Representative Smith and Gen Olson as they have attended many meetings on this issue. Brenneman asked what the Council planned to do to stop this project. Mayor Peterson reiterated that the Council will discuss this issue in executive session with the City Attorney to review options available to the Council. Jabbour advised that this issue is bigger than just one landing PUBLIC HEARING HELD REGARDING DNR’S PROPOSED LAKE ACCESS ON MAXWELL BAY ORONO CITY COUNCIL - JANUARY 6, 1992 and urged citizens to get involved. Steve Smith, State Representative, noted he sees a great number of disparities, one of which is the Chair of the Tax Committee for the House of Representatives has an eighty acre home in Aitkin on which he pays $240.00 in taxes a year, while most citizens in attendance probably pay much more than that a year. He noted that when local government aid is figured, Orono is figured at $.33/capita and in Bovy they get $483.00 for every man, woman and child and $470.00 for every man, woman and child in Aitkin. He explained there are too many tax spenders in St. Paul and not enough taxpayers. He advised he would be dining with the Govenor the following day and he intended to discuss this issue with him at that time. He also indicated that he would be drafting legislation requiring entities to give a 90 day notice and conduct several public hearings for projects such as this one. Ron Stauffer, 326£ North Shore Drive, noted he approached by the DNR to review this project and is the launch being built. was never opposed to Ed McDonald, 3265 Bohns Point Lane, asked if County Road 51 could be designated as no parking. Callahan noted it is a County Road and the City does not have jurisdiction over the road. He did indicate the City could impose such a restriction over Bohns Point Lane. Callahan went on to point out that as changes are made to Highway 12, County Road 51 will be impacted and Hennepin County Highway Department has decided not to take a stance on the Highway 12 issue and has not focussed on this at all. When the County is supplying the DNR with information regarding traffic on County Road 51, they are not taking into account any additional traffic from the rerouting or expansion of Highway 12. Jay Lawrence, 1448 Baldur Park Road, has observed people already using his drive for a turnaround and with additional launching areas, this situation will only get worse. He was also concerned about the safety factor. Christine Brickley, 3262 North Shore Drive, felt that the DNR had been planning this project long before it was brought to the public's attention. She noted that she had contacted the property owner last spring about purchasing the parcel in question and was told that he was a''aiting a decision from the DNR regarding purchasing the property. Terry Forbord, 265 West Point Road, explained that he has always 8 PUBLIC HEARING HELD REGARDING DNR'S PROPOSED LAKE ACCESSON MAXWELL BAYORONO CITY COUNCIL - JANUARY 6, 1992wanted to live on Lake Minnetonka and has recently purchased a home on the lake, but during the years has watched all these changes in and around the lake and wonders about the future. He felt the DNR does not have the right to use taxpayer money to manage the lake in a manner not agreeable to the taxpayers. He urged the Council to join with other surrounding communities to fight against this mismanagement. He suggested that there should be no additional funding for public access and any money available should be used to help solve existing problems. Pat Gonion, 3186 North Shore Drive, noted they just purchased their home and prior to that, her husband contacted the DNR to inquire about Maxwell Bay and they never mentioned a proposed boat launch. Jabbour explained he has been working with a nation-wide group called the Clean Water Action which is concerned about the environmental quality of water. He suggested the group help to introduce legislation which will put a moratorium on any public access for 5 years and defer the funds for research on the zebra mussel. Jabbour pointed out that most people in attendance have been before the Council requesting a variance of some sort, and have been asked by the Council to modify their lifestyle to comply with the ordinances. He felt the DNR should be asked to do the same. Castagna reiterated that the LMLOA is working very hard for lakeshore homeowners and the LMLOA needs the support of every one of them. He urged all lakeshore owners to join the organization. Ginny Lee, Aitkin, Minnesota, urged citizens to join the State organizations who are working for them. David Dotzenroth, 3225 Casco Circle, noted that they should be concerned with the loss of tourism with the spread of milfoil and zebra mussels, and noted that if that base is lost, all would be paying a larger portion through taxes. r»r-T# JAf, I , PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT STUDY SEWAGE LAGOON CITY OF ORONO, MN November 5, 1991 I )\i II c .kj :\ SI l.\lvl Me A\ A\n ( ivv\ (•It <'9^ - L ONSUin^t, n ANNMIS I ANJPSt A»*t APi Miff* IS 4! HK nT AVI si II S« )P TH siriri :\o Ml SSI Al'i >l 5> MS Ml • i ‘ 4 I i V «»<• ORONO SEWER LAGOON PROPERTYOBJECTIVE:To provide a preliminary analysis of the sewajic lagoon site to determine the development potential for I) a park. 2) resideniial. or 3) a combination of park and residential.SITE ANALYSIS:Tlie lagoon and surrounding marsh area is pan of the Erench Lake Watershed and is classified as a Natural Environment (NE) area. Wethmd rcsirictions for this area eliminates 27.3 acres of the total 38 acre site. o Developable Land o Undevelopable Land - Pump Station - DikeAVetlands 9.2 acres 1.5 acres 27.3 acres o TOTAL ACRES 38.0 acres 111.THREE ALTERNATIVES 1. Alternative One - maximizes site as a city park. - Existing DikeyTrail - Attractive Lagoon & Marsh • Oak Knoll/F’icnic area - Potential Connections to Residential & Noerenberg Park - Site is tucked away, unable to see from road. 2. Alternative Two - m.iximi/,cs site for residential development. - Restricted by 150 ’ wetland setback for scwer/unscwcred. - Zoning Restrictions, currently zemed for 2 acre lots. To maximize residential development rezone to R-IA standards = 8 - one acre lots. - Marsh/Wetland Ownership 3. Alternative Three - combination of park & residential development. - Maintain curamt zoning .standards. 2 acre lots. - Public Access to homes & trail. - Parking pnwided for trail users. 10-12 cars. - Possible trail parking lot could be located in MWC^' Lift Station pmperty if MWCC fence is moved toward pump house - Future park development on nonhem 3.1 acres with public access to the north. - Maintain Wethuul/Nature Reserve. I ^ L * I • lX)NG LAKE f ^ ••‘I*-:--,' V"^- I ^ - *l''' ( »:■ ^ ->v^T-' ^'%'" JQEfiCh \ V ^ ’Kv QUftSIMfi OM-l omthi oim-iI 90^n-m ww^mmmmtmrn mmm ! Jl^» MT#« ' *04 T'^*'^&<^^5!j^i{5i{afi|^; w ;vfi^ . A »r . -• -^ ?^ uiiiiimMiii i f * . K;:<». I ;r ^ »^>' • *iT i . ?Wr4r-i # Vst > * *• •j- ..»• ^ *•♦ I N t?/Tf ANAbt^l^ CIT\ JF CRONC. MN Stiyk ,€ lAOC^ '■■'■'fK.i’''- i * H- mi.' .i 'i IWT* -■»>|4 fPi*- *> l4».r|W'#v 4 »f-4Tf ^*1- H # jr 4 ♦ ►#♦4' >- ♦ ■ *-M '#■*•'•' PfOiC;' /*t WETLAND INVENTORY MAP SOU'»''E US fISH s WiLt/Uff ss: ^ ,r.»4|y • » 4 t ^9 ^ 4 *. / .• • • CITY OF ORONO. MN SEWAGE lAGOOW I! k c /’•i _____1 i L^v- 9 -------- .1. ._ I«ft«i-* ««* •», , fiDTLfflT r !3 • 1 $d-04. u»** AIXZ'H oh ^ CITY or OHONO. HN • >-■ V? ip i' if p'' L rlr, I I* ALT3 , 2u>u>K>imM. CITY OF ORONO. MN SEWMQELAQOON • m T‘i lytfV Wf- ■/ COKING NORTH TOWARD LAGOON looking SOUTHWEST TOWARD OAK KNOtL FROM DIKE t MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - OCTOBER 14. 1991 ROLL ^ -1 —4. nn the above date with the following members The Council . peterson, CounciImembers J. Diann present: Mayor B^rbar ^ Callahan. Mary Butler was Goetten. Gabriel Jabbour and tawa staff: City absent. The following P . Works Director John Gerhardson, Administrator Ron ^ nd^ngV Zoning Administrator Finance Director Zoning Administrator Michael Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant P ® city Engineer Glenn Cook, 15, 16. and 20 to the consent(#1) CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Peterson added Items #1 i agenda. It was -roved by fonowtH^f te-ns^ ^approve 1‘S? ollnil aeet,^ Bay sanitary sewer del Inquent septic inspection plan. Tesolution; cer^t f cat ^ recycling program fee. fees, sewer and and salary review for maintenance :irK,r?'“Si=trSb:,^a?nS:rr"icenses- and tne bills. Ayes 4. nays 0. A, ,11 -M-omt: adoDted by consent agenda will be ,nc,ur.rin%nr:inuila l^^tne^?«pec?ive numerical order. (*#2) APPROVAL OF MINUTES . „ 11,*,=.r^ cflconded bv Goetten to approve the ilnutes "rthe regular Orino Council meeting held on Septemoer 23, 1991. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#3) SEWER PLANT PROPERTY PLAN Oiok Flint, '’*'''‘.„^°""ils pronertJ. s noted that the Park discussion eoncsr-iing ?ave..ue ano tne value of the co-amission recognizes "'^“.ad that because of the upgrade to Site for park purposes. e^Darienca a lot of development Highway 12. “ FI 1 nt^explained that the Commission pressure In the ^ ^op development and still main- feels It 1s best to use th property that is why theyt.in accsas public enJoyment^of^t.e^P .ith^r, SS;rdlonrir^vide'’=Ptions for development of the property. ,.K« was not being presented to the Pi:^Mng CommtsslS?; for their input on the development. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - OCTOBER U, 1991 SEWER PLANT PROPERTY PLAN - CONT. Callahan explained that typically if a developer were to bring an ap^ltcatton Hke this to the Planning Commission they would already have consulted a planner for this type of ^^put. He noted that the expendltui-’e was denied last time to give the commission an opportunity to discuss the fact that the land would have ?o oe Jurchas^^ by the Commission to use as park land. He felt that they should now go ahead and authorize expend! .ure of the money to hire the consultant. Goetten asked if the Council felt that this property is so unique as to require p'ofesssional help such as this. Mayor Peterson agreed with Callahan. Jabbour felt the need to get someone from the real estate market or outside to determine the true value of the land. Mayor Peterson asked If the Commission Intended to see the property developed 100%. Goetten felt that it should not be developed to that level. Callahan noted that if it is subdivided for development, it would then go to the Planning Commission for *heir review. It was moved by Callahan. seconded by Mayor Peterson. to ...rhnrire axuediture by the Park Commission of up to $950 to co^??acr wt^i; rjrS?essional planner for the sewer pond property, to be p«a 11 for out Dedication Fund. Ayes nays 0. Mayor Peterson asked how soon this would be completed. foolied that it wou 1 d be completed within one month. He on ?o info^m%hi council of the Park Commission's decision to hold a public hearing to discuss the property t owns in the Crystal Bay neignbornood. Garhardson noted that this is not actually a public hearing, but rather A public informatIon roesting. cunt axDlained that the City does need an overall comprehensive oar^pla^ Srnoted the las? one was done in 1980 and it needs t^be upSited. To date, he noted that the Commission has dealt with matters as they come up. but feels it needs to go y establish this long range plan. Jabbour noted that the Crystal Bay site will be the last to be developed, probably in about 1 1/2 years. May^r Peterson explained the Crystal Bay residents see a little league ball field, tennis court, or nockey rink. ( c • •9 MINUTES OF the RESULAH ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - OCTOBER 14. 1991 li' SEWER PLANT PROPERTY PLAN - CONT. Flint noted in order to build a little league ball field, additional prop0Pty would havs to be accjuired, Jabbour raminded that walking paths are He noted that the LMCD cnoose to take the position Is In the existing Comprehensive Plan regarding Big felt that having an overall Comprehensive Plan would be helpful when attending meetings of other organizations. Goattcn felt because of the level of involvement of the Park ^SSilMlon? a liason should be established to help the Commission with their work. Flint noted that would be helpful as Gerhardson is the only oerson serving as liason and cannot keep up with requests. He advised that other cities receive money in a combination of '^^ys, «ueh as user fees» operating budgets, park dedication and bonding. He felt that the City should look at other options for funding. Goetten felt a task force should be formed to review this matter. Goetten noted that Moorse should organize this task force. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Peterson adjourned the Council meeting at 7.2?. p.m. for the HRA meeting. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING RESUMES Mayor Peterson resumed the Council meeting at 7:27 p.m. FuANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS There were no comments representative, Sara Moos. from the Planning Commission PUBLIC COMMENTS There were nc comments from the public. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - OCTOBER I4i 1991 (#4) #1573 CAROL KELLY/JAMES MASSEY, 3020/3030 CASCO POINT ROAC A) REQUEST FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION REGARDING PARK FEE - REPORT BY CITY ATTORNEY B) FINAL SUBDIVISION Carol Kelly was present for this application. Moorse explained that this Is a subdivision application tnat has been before the Council prior to this meeting. He noted there are a couple of Issues that need to be resolved, the first being the amount of the park dedication fee to be paid and the second when that feei needs to be paid. He noted that the assessor has reduced the valuation to $72,000. thereby reducing the fee due to $5,760, He explained that payment of the fee Is a condition of final subdivision approval, due prior to filing the plat. Goetten asked If the oecond lot could be sold without final subdivision approval. Jabbour noted that It could not, however the applicant defer payment of the park fee until a later date, but the valuation would then be recalculated from the payment date. Barrett noted that he was incorrect in his original finding at the last meeting, and that the Council does have the option to delay action on the final plat, however, the valuation would then be calculated from that extended time period. Mabusth explained the applicant has a six month period In which to file the plat once the Council has granted final subdivision approval. Kelly noted that she has been trying to complete the subdivision for 1 1/2 years, and It was originally filed under the old park dedication fee ordinance which would have required a $400 payment. She has since lost two potential buyers because of the status of the subdivision. Goetten noted the Council understands the problems with this applIcatlon. Kelly noted that she has spent approximately $20,000 on the entire subdivision and all required Improvements to the property. She noted that had she been told of the additional park fees In August, she would have discontinued the application and saved approximately $4,200. Jabbour suggested that they approve the final plat but do not file It for the six month allowed period of time. Mabusth noted tha after the six months, applicant could request an extension with no additional fees. r c: c. r m • / MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF DECEMBER 3. 1991 ATTENDANCE 7:06 P.M. _ _ _ _ Th. park Susan ^nson?"Brucf sta??f''ochn ’L^hardtc ”"pub,1= Works Director; and Ter, Naab. city Recorder. (#1) WELCOME NEW MEMBER SHEROKEE ILSE 4. mamhar of the Park Commission,Chair Flint welcome the newest member of the Sh«rok«e Use. 4«4.a,wacfPd in serving on the Commission Use said she has been excited to get a chance to work for quite some «®ono „ark system. She noted some towards good planning for the ° ^ issues and maintaining a of her concerns were '“““e Stated that she ls balance between and feU some of the park excited about the b ^ ^ .^g gas Interested In what the ;3»il”?Sn be dolng'wlth respect to the comprehensive park plan. (#2) INTROUCTION OF CITY ADMINISTRATOR RON MOORSE Chair Flint introduced the his attendance at XL ---Commission was for Orono. JSSarSs t2 city parks and facilities. (#3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES *'’ss.n":s\Sar?h:%^ti“be%a£i:d*untn"^rn.i? meeting. All members agreed. Chair Flint •>-u®S\‘po??1oS‘rf"?hrm?Ju»s "■?rSr%hr*Cou^i :::;inS ’” o"S:ir*?4?hri^i «ked them to review those minutes. (#4) SANDY BEACH SWIMMING BEACH REVIEW Chair Flint *'J2ilnq’Area''a»k1nr?o'-**»""«"***®"'**^'’® JCUiSS'JaaS^'Su^out the Installation of the dock. Wilson asked If the dosing time had been changed. naar 1991 • ^ • • fc.r • * • -• ' - MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETINQ OF OSCIMilR 3i SANDY BEACH SWIMMING BEACH REVIEW - CONT. Gerhardson noted it had not, but increased enforcement wasr- Maron Koistinen. 1535 Minnie Avenue, noted he is in favor of tne •dock being reinstalled, but stated he does not live directly near ‘the oeach area. He noted the swimming area is small and the dock doubles the play area for kids. He indicated that he had talked with the kids in the area, and explained the dock had not been Installed because of their behavior and suggested to them chat 1i their behavior changed during the past season, perhaps the dock would be reinstalled. Chair Flint asked if the beach area is ever too crowded. Koistinen noted that at times it may be with up to approximately 20 kids. He indicated that it is a^so hard to tell where ...le beach property ends and the private property begins. Bruce Feldman, 3898 Cherry Avenue, noted he lives adjacent to the beach area and noted the situation had improved immensely, and stated he also spoke for his neighbors. Dick and Beth Nelson, IlSo adjacent to the beach. He noted in the past they had been abused by teenagers at all times. He noted no decrease in family use of the beach area. but a decrease in use by troub.emakers. Ho felt that the area could not support as large a ^ City had previously installed. He stated that about 97% of t problem has been corrected. Chair Flint asked Feldman if he had noticed increased police pi otection. Feldman noted ho had not but had not been looking for it either. Vongries asked if more smaller children had used the area. Feldman felt the beach had bean used by more smaller children with their parents. Bradley asked about the easement noted as Grant Street n plat map. Gerhardson explained that it is of-way and had not been designed as a swimming beach such Sandy Beach Swimming Area. Chair Flint asked about the other access further to the east. Oerhardson noted that Is only a coat Beach Sale area Is approximately 30' elde. «lth the Improved area directly adjacent to Feldman. the minutes of the park commission meeting of DECEMBER 3, 1991 SANDY BEACH SWIMMING BEACH REVIEW - CONT. Faldman noted that the buoys that are placed in the swim area are nSi !S' ?n from the lot line. Me also noted that people bring their pets to the beach and let them run. Vongries noted that the problem has been eliminated, yet a swim srod 1s still ni31 nt31 n6d. Feldman also noted the fence is currently broken and snowmobiles ars crossing onto his property. Chair Flint noted a letter received by Dale Woodbeck, 1445 Cherry Placi. asMnr the City to reinstall the dock n the swim area. The letter is attached to the minutes as Exhibit A. Tt was moved by Vongries. seconded b> Bradley, to recommend thatJSe CoSncn not authorize the installation of a dock at Sandy Beach Swis* Area for the 1992 summer season. Johnston felt that recommenoation should re-lect that the dock not be installed permanently. Tt was moved by Vongries. seconded by Bradley, to recommend tnat JJe Luncn not aCthorIze the insta 1 latlon of the dock at Sandy Beach Swim Area permanently. Ayes 7, nays 0. Use noted she had attended meetings where the neighbors of tne erH dMcrIbed the problems and felt badly for them. She fe t their responsibility is to take complaints of residents ser ou y and do something to Improve the situation if possible. (#S) SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT - PLAN REVIEW Oerhardson noted that Cathy Skalicky of Dahlgr-. UbSn hM providad another alternative, as r.quested by the cammlsslon for development with a 2 acre lot site with a trail s%taii>. Flint notad that t.e met with Planning Commission ^ "5:n:]r’?2r'“?MrprSp:rt;:' "°^tsrn;t?r*;h“sr"s‘kSMckj JS§“®Mtbaek ?i:oJ t^. Zetland area. The X H. JxJuX ?nai the eklsting road that runs to thfl noptn of tha proparty could be used as a walking pa p2«.‘^ Sh1?h w2uld be r.tainad for us. aa^.lth.r p«rk land, or if access was provided to the north in possibly a building site. Wilson asked slv*" *be ISO' setback, where the building pad would ba for the 2 buildable lots. TO;Mayor and City Council FROM:Ron Moorse, City Administrator DATE:January 10, 1992 SUBJECT:DNR Proposal for Pub11C Access % I Ir Representatives of the DNR and LMCD will attend the January 13 Council meeting to present a revised proposal concerning the Maxwell Bay public access. Details of the proposal have not been finalized at this time but the proposal will be ready for presentation on Monday. To: Froa: Date: Subject: Mayor Peterson & Orono Council Members City Administrator Moorse January 7, 1992 A. t., #1573 Carol J. Kelly and James Massey, 3020/3030 Casco Point Road - Final Subdivision - Resolution ^0 List of Bxhibits Exhibit A - Council Action Notice of 10/23/91 Exhibit B - Final Plat Exhibit C - Pinal Subdivision Resolution ! ' Ms. Kelly has contacted the City staff to advise she wishes to be scheduled before the Council for final action on her plat at the January 13, 1992 meeting. The applicant has been advised that the final plat mylars cannot be filed until the City is in receipt of a park dedication fee payment of $5,760.00. The applicant has also been readvised that the plat will not be accepted for filing in 1932 until all real estate taxes for both applicant's property and Massey's property have been paid for the full year. The applicant will have until July 13, 1992 to meet the deadline for the filing of the plat. The City staff will ask for at least two weeks prior notice so that there is adequate time to prepare the filing packet. «•fe..,iv*:- APPLICATION NO. 1573 CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 473-7357 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION 55323 Date of Notice: 10/23/91 TO:Carol J. Kelly 3020 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 COPIES:James L. Massey 3030 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Final Subdivision DATS OF MBBTIN6:10-14-91 VOTE: 5 For 0 Against COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION: Council voted to table all action on your final subdivision application until you have made a determination as to how and when you wish Council to vote on the final subdivision approval. You are also advised that the Park Dedication fee now at $5,760.00 must be paid as a condition of final subdivision approval and cannot be delayed until a building permit application has been filed by future owner. Staff had an opportunity to discuss with you over the phone the options provided by Council at their last meeting. They are as follows: A. Delay final subdivision action by Orono Council until lot is sold. Once you are satisfied that you have a legitimate buyer you must immediatley alert the zoning staff so that they can prepare a resolution approving the final subdivision for action at an upcoming Council meeting. Once again as a reminder, the Council meets the 2nd and 4th Mondays of each month. Since we are nearing the Christmas season you should be advised that the Council will meet only on December 9th of that month as the 4th Monday meeting will be cancelled because of the Christmas Holiday. As the City attorney advised, your application may be subject to reconsideration of the market value of the property at the time you file the subdivision to determine if Park Dedication fee is to be readjusted. As I also noted, if the plat is filed after January 1, 1992 all real estate taxes for both Massey and your properties must be paid before the plat can be filed by the City. B. Approval of" final plat. Council has agreed to delay the filing of the final plat until the City is in receipt of the Park Dedication payment. Applicant has until April 28, 1992 to complete filing. Per Section 11.10, Subdivision 22 (B), applicant may extend final subdivision approval for an additional 6 months without additional payment. The Ordinance is specific and states that final subdivision approval cannot be extended beyond 1 year or 360 days from the original final subdivision approval date (October 26, 1991 to October 26, 1992). Once again as already noted above in Option A, if the r Zoning File #1573 October 23, 1991 Page 2 of 2 subdivision is filed after January 1, 1992, all real estate taxes due jjigulnst the property for 1992 must be paid before the City can file the plat. Once again contact my office if you have any further questions concerning the options noted above. As you advised per our recent phone conversation you wished to be scheduled before the Council at their October 28, 1991 meeting. The appropriate docxunents have been £unended and Council nay formally act on your final subdivision if that is your final wish. t i >t t:•• A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OP KELLY 2ND ADDITION APPLICATION NO. 1573 NHBRBASr the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota? and WHEREAS# the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City? and WHEREAS# the City Council has considered the application for a Class III subdivision of a 3 lot plat by Carol J. Kelly and James Massey, (hereinafter "the subdividers")? WHEREAS# the subdivision has been found to meet all standards of the LR—lC lakeshore residential zoning district finding that each lot is * size and configuration that will allow the continued use of Lots 1 and ^ for single family residential use without the need of any vailances and Lot 2 to be fully developed without the need of any variances? and WHEREAS# the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including; 1. Completion of all the requirements of Resolution No. 2869. 2. Dedication on the plat of drainage and utility easements. 3.Subdividers have completed the realignment of the drainage ditch along the shared lot lines of Lots 2 and 3. Drainage easements have been granted over the realigned drainage ditch on the plat. 4, Applicant has completed the rer.ioval of 398 s.f. of existing hardcover on Lot 1. 5.Payment to the City of a Par)c Dedication Fee in the amount of $5#760.00. 6. Payment to the City for the legal review and filing of the plat in the amount of $150.00. WOW# THEREFORE# BE IT RESOLVED# that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Kelly 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to the following conditions: Page 1 of 3 f- • • 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Current and future owner of Lot 1 is hereby advised that hardcover within the 75-250' setback area is at 4^395 s.f. or 25.2%. Any additional improvements to this property resulting in increases in hardcover must be approved by the City of Orono and may result in equal or greater removal of existing hardcover. Current owner of Lot 3 is advised that present dock location will have to be altered next season to meet the required setback from final approved lot lines. Future dock to serve newly created riparian Lot 2 shall meet the pertinent LMCD standards that determine the allowed boat density units at the dock based on 75-85’ of lineal footage of shoreline. Owner is further advised that in consideration of the marsh-like lands adjacent to the potential dock site that no structure or improvments may be placed or installed above the 929.4 elevation without appropriate variance approvals from the Cii^v. Upon application for a building permit for new construction on Lot 2, the future owner shall pay the following: A.Sewer Unit Charge - $1,569.28 (based on 1991 rate to be amended to meet current Fee Schedule at time of application for permit) B.Water Unit Charge - $1,764.53 (based on 1991 rate to be amended to meet current Fee Schedule at time of application for permit) The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with either the Hennepin County Recorder's Office or the Registrar of Title's Office on or before July 13, 1992 together with a certified original copy of this Resolution. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Page 2 of 3 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of January, 1992. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )88. COONTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13th day of January^ 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hr.llin, Mayor k City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. I ■, ■ Notary Public Page 3 of 3 I r TOx Mayor Peterson & Orono Council Members City Administrator Moorse Fron: Datex Subject: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Adm^^strator January 7, 1992 ^4: - - #1682 Christine Brickley, 3262 North Shore J > Variance List of Bzhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Notice of Council Action 11/27/91 Notice of Council Action 11/12/91 Sketches of Possible Options Memo and Exhibits of 11/4/91 Discussion Staff has met with Ms. Brickley to discuss various methods for revising the garage to more closely meet code requirements. Inspection has verified that the garage as isr is 672 s.f. in floor ares and therefore only needs to meet 10' setbacks from the south and west of lot lines. It currently is about 14' from the south lot line, and 3.3* from the west lot line. Some possibilities discussed with the applicant include various combinations of the following: -adding gutters to west roof line -remove slab south of garage -cutback west 7' of garage -remove remaining slab west of cutback garage -remove lakeside deck. Applicant's preferred plan ’/oulu be to leave the structure as is, adding gutters at the west end to redirect roof runoff to the interior of the lot, and taking the necessary steps to underpin the south garage wall without total removal of the remaining slab. If need be, applicant would consider removal of the remaining slab and/or removal of the existing lakeside deck in order to avoid having to move or revise the garage. (See sketches 1 through 4). Sketches 2 through 4 result in decreased overall hardcover on the property from the pre-existing condition, but do not address the structural encroachment less than 10' from the west side lot line. If Council determines that the structural encroachment is not mitigated merely by hardcover reductions, options 5 through 8 include “ 7' cutback of the west garage wall to meet the 10' setback. Applicant is exploring various methods of accomplishing^ tl^is, ^and there ma ^jnay be ways to salvage the existing trusses and roof structure without totally removing it. Applicant has received a bid of $1,800.00 for cutting and removal of the southerly 11' of slab. She Memo *1682 January 7, 1992 Page 2 also received an estimate of $4,500.00 for lifting the garage and turning it 90 degrees, which does not accomplish anything. Exhibit C lists the lot coverage, hardcover and setback ramifications of each of the eight options. Other combinations of the above noted changes probably exist. Staff RecoHBandation In order to come to a conclusion on this application. Council should determine if either the hardcover issue or the setback issue have priority over the other. If hardcover is the main issue, consider options 2 through 4. If structural encroachment of the side setback is the priority issue, consider option 5. If both hardcover and setback issues have equal priority, consider options 6, 7, or 8. Finally^ temper the question of whether a legitimate hardship exists, with the potential for hardcover reductions and the benefit to the neighborhood of replacing three smaller structures with one structure of equivalent or lesser total footprint area. A resolution will be drafted for your next meeting upon Council's direction. To: Pros Date: Mayor Peterson S Orono Council Meniher' City Administrator Moorse Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator January 1, 1992 Sobjacti #1682 Christine Brickley, 3262 North Shore Drive Variance List of Bxhiblts Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Ex'ibit D - Discnssion Notice of Coinril Action 11/27/91 Notice of CoMicil Action 11/12/91 Sketches of Possible Options Memo and Exhibits of 11/4/91 Staff has met with Ms. Brickley to discuss various methods for revising the garage to more closely meet code requirements. Inspection has verified that the garage as is, is 672 s.f. in floor area and therefore only needs to meet 10' setbacks from the south and west of lot lines. It currently is about 14' from the south lot line, and 3.3' from the west lot line. Some possibilities discussed with the applicant include various combinations of the following: -adding gutters to west roof line -reaiove slab south of garage -cutback west 7* of garage -remove remaining slab west of cutback garage -remove lakeside deck. Applicant's preferred plan would be to leave the structure as is, adding gutters at the west end to redirect roof runoff to the interior of the lot, and taking the necessary steps to underpin the south garage wall without total removal of the remaining slab. If need be, applicant would consider removal of the remaining slab and/or removal of the existing lakeside deck in order to avoid having to move or revise the garage. (See sketches 1 through 4). Sketches 2 through 4 result ii. decreased overall hardcover on the property from the pre-existing condition, but do not address the structural encroachment less than 10' from the west side lot line. If Council determines that the structural encroachment is not ■itigated merely by hardcover reductions, options 5 through 8 include a 7' cutback of the west garage wall to meet the 10' setback. Applicant is exploring various methods of accomplishing this, and there may be ways to salvage the existing trusses and roof structure without totally removing it. Applicant has received a bid of 91,800.00 for cutting and removal of the southerly 1^’ of slab. She Memo #1682 January 1, 1992 Prrre 2 also received an estimate of $4,500.00 for lifting the garage and turning it 90 degrees, which does not accomplish anything. Exhibit C lists the lot coverage, hardcover and setback ramifications of each of the eight options. Other combinations of the above noted changes probably exist. Staff Recoaaendation In order to come to a conclusion on this application. Council should determine if either the hardcover issue or the setback issue have priority over the other. If hardcover is the main issue, consider options 2 through 4. If structural encroachment of the side setback is the priority issue, consider opt.i'^n 5. If both hardcover and setback issues have equal priority, consider options 6, 7, or 8. Finally, temper the question of whether a legitimate hardship exists, with the potential for hardcover reductions and the benefit to the neighborhood of replacing three smaller structures with one structure of equivalent or lesser total footprint area. ^ fir'AJt*yr c CITY OP ORONO P.O. Box 6*^ Crystal Bay, MN 473-7357 55323 APPLICATION NO. 1682 NOTICE OP COUNCIL ACTION Date of Notice: 11/27/91 TOi Christine Brickley 3262 North Shore Drive Wayzata# MN 55391 COPIES: TXPB OF APPLICATION: Variance DATS OP rriNG: 11/25/91 VOTE: 4 For 0 Against ! •it.I IlCIL ACTION - MOTION: Table until applicant has a chance to meet with staff to discuss options. Please make an appointment to meet with Mike Gaffron (473-7357) by Thursday, December 3 for the December 9th meeting, or by Wednesday, jiinuary 8 for the January 13th meeting (no Council mef^ting on December 23). Isv CITY OP ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal 6ay, MN 55323 473-7357 APPLICATION NO. 1682 NOTICE OP COUNCIL ACTION Date of Notice: 11/14/91 TOi Christine Brlckley 3262 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 TYPE OP APPLICATION: Variance DATS OP MBBTIN6: 11/12/91 VOTE: 5 For 0 Against To:Mayor Peterson & Orono Council Members City Administrator Moorse Proa:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:November 4, 1991 Subject: #1682, Christine Brickley, 3262 North Shore Drive Variance - Resolution Zoning District - LR-lC-1, Single family lakeshore residential, 1/2 acre, unsewered Application - Request for variances to construct detached garage. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit 0 Resolution Notice of Planning Commission Action 10/23/91 Sketch by Staff Memo and Exhibits of 10/14/91 Rote: This application unfortunately has changed to an after-the-fact situation. The weekend after the Planning Commission meeting, construction was commenced on the proposed garage without final Council action nor a building permit. This came to staff's attention on Monday, October 28th and a stop work order was posted. The applicant was advised that work could not continue until such time that the Council approves the necessary variances and a building permit is issued. To make matters worse, the garage was not constructed per the revised plan approved by the Planning Commission. The roof was pitched such that half its runoff is directed to the side lot line where only a 3' setback was proposed, and this will potentially direct runoff to the neighboring property. Discussion Please review the memos and exhibits of October 14th and September 6th. Briefly, the applicant poured a slab without contacting the City nor obtaining any approval for her intended garage construction. The inspection staff found the slab being poured in late August, and advised the owner of the apparent problems that would be encountered in constructing a garage at that location. The subsequent survey found that the slab was poured 3.3' from the west lot line and 2.6' from the south lot line. Applicant intended to construct a 1,056 s.f. garage on this 32'x32' slab. She was advised of the need for a number of variances and made application. After the initial Planning Commission review in September, at which tabling occurred, applicant revised her proposal to a 768 s.f. (24'x32*) garage. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.03, SUBDIVISION 14 (C), AND 10.03, SUBDIVISION 9 (E), AND SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 FILE #1682 WHEREAS, Christine Brickley (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the property located at 3262 North Shore Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows; Exhibit A attached (hereinafter "the property"); ar.-^ WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (E) to allow a proposed detached garage of 768 s.f. to be constructed 10.5' from the south lot line and 3.3' from the west lot line where a setback of 15' is normally required from said lot lines, and a variance to Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) to allow lot coverage of 17.5% where only 15% lot coverage is normally allowed, and a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to allow hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone in excess of the 25% hardcover normally allowed. HOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1682. The property is located in the LR-lC-1 Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on September 16, 1991 and tabled the request to allow the applicant to submit a revised plan. The Planning Commission reviewed the revised proposal on October 21, 1991 and on a vote of 6 to 0 recommended approval of variances to construct a 24'x32' garage located 3.3' from the west lot line and 10.5' from the south lot line, based on the following findings: Page 1 of 7 'i. * a)The proposed 768 s.f. detached garage replaces a pre­ existing 480 s.f. garage, 200 s.f. barn and 80 s.f. storage shed with a single structure of approximately the same square footage as the three pre-existing buildings. Applicant has agreed to remove the three smaller buildings in exchange for the new detached garage. The pre-existing 75-250' hardcover was 50.6%. If an 8'x32’ portion of the concrete garage slab which was poured without prior approvals is removed, hardcover on the property will be reduced to 46.9% in the 75-250' zone. c)Lot coverage by structures will remain at the pre­ existing level of 17.5%. The small lot size constitutes a hardship to the property. Consolidation of three storage buildings on the property into a single building will reduce the visual density and clutter in the neighborhood. Locating the garage 10.5 frc.n the south lot line is justified from the standpoint that if the garage was 18 s.f. smaller, only a 10' setback would be rteq’Hred. The 3.3' setback from the west lot line is justified by the need to maintain the full 32' depth of the garage without encroaching on the loop driveway which serves the immediate neighborhood. 4.The revised garage proposal shewed a roof peak running east- west, which would discharge storm water runoff to applicant's yard rather than the neighboring property. 5.After the Planning Commission meeting, applicant proceeded to construct a garage without final Council approval or the necessary building permit. During that construction, the roof line was reversed so that runoff will be directed towards the neighboring property which is only 3' from the garage wall and less than 2' from the roof overhang. Page 2 of 7 6, The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 7. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary tc preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. COMCLOSIOIlSr ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2, Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (E), and Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) to permit the construction of a 24'x32* detached garage located 3.3' from the west lot line and 10.5' from the south lot line where normally 15* lot line setbacks would be required, and allowing lot coverage to increase to 17.5% where only 15% lot coverage is normally allowed, and allowing 46.9% hardcover in the 75-250' zone where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed, subject to the following conditions: 1. Hardcover in the 75-250' zone is approved at level of 46.9%. All existing and proposed hardcover approved with this variance approval is recorded in the calculation worksheet and diagram enclosed with this resolution as page 3. The current property owner and all future owners of the property are placed on notice that hardcover shall not be increased above the currently approved level and any proposed Improvements of the property that would result in additional hardcover in either the 0-75' or 75-250’ zone must be approved by the City. Such approval may result in a requirement for concurrent equivalent or greater removals of Page 4 of 7 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. existing hardcover. All existing hardcover scheduled for removal as a condition of this resolution must be removed and inspected prior to recommencement of construction. The garage roof shall be reconstructed with the peak running in an east-west direction, to direct runoff onto applicant’s property rather than onto the neighboring property. Prior to recommencement of construction, applicant shall provide the building inspector with suitable construction plans conforming to the conditions of this resolution, and shall obtain the appropriate permit for such construction. In addition to the normal building permit fee, applicant shall pay the after-the-fact investigation fee for the building permit because construction was commenced prior to issuance of a building permit. Applicant shall pay the after-the-fact investigation fee for the zoning application because construction was commenced without the proper variance approvals being obtained. Applicant shall remove the 8'x32' excess slab prior to commencement of construction, and shall take whatever measures are required by the Inspections Department in order to make the remaining slab viable for supporting the proposed garage. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (November 12, 1992). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned app] Leant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of herself, her heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 5 of 7 Pile #1682 November 4, 1991 Page 2 Planning ConBission Recomendation At their October meeting. Planning Commission recommended approval of a 768 s.f. garage to be located on the northerly 3/4's of the slab as poured. On a vote of 6 to 0, the Planning Commission recommended approval for the following variances: West Side Setback South (Rear) Setback Hardcover, 75-250* Lot Coverage Hardcover Allowed or Required 15' 15' 25% 15% Proposed (As Revised) 3.3' 10.6' 46.9% 17.5% Variance 11.7' 4.4' 21.9% 2.5% t’ The Planning Commission recommended that the 8'x32' remaining portion of slab be removed, as well as the 9'x9' shed. This results in a decrease in 75-250* hardcover on the property from a pre-existing level of 50.6% down to 46.9%. Note that when the applicant commenced construction on the garage without a permit, she had not removed the 8*x32* portion of slab. Issues to Consider 1. Planning Commission in their initial review only touched briefly on the issue of the use of this garage for storage of masonry business equipment and materials. Does placing this garage in the context of a home occupation impact the variance request? No home occupation license has been applied for. 2. In order to make use of the 32* roof trusses ordered and delivered prior to approvals or permits, applicant pitched the roof so that it may negatively Impact the neighboring properties due to runoff. If a garage is approved for this site, does the roof have to be reoriented? 3. The building inspectors have indicated that a garage meeting 10' or 15* setbacks could be constructed using the existing slab, as long as the extraneous portions of slab are removed and the remaining perimeter is reinforced with a poured underpinning. The fact that the slab was poured too close to the lot line may not be a reasonable justification to allow a garage to be constructed at substandard setbacks. Are there legitimate hardships to allow this totally new garage to be located 3.3* from the side lot line where a 15* setback is required? 'r File #1682 November 4, 1991 Page 3 4.Given that actual construction of the garage commenced with neither final action on the variance nor a building permit# staff requests Council's direction as to whether the zoning application# building permit# or both# should be assessed the penalty fee. Staff Re ndation A resolution reflecting the Planning Commission recommendation has been drafted for Council consideration. That resolution can easily be revised based on whatever action is taken by the Council. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 12th day of November, 1991. ATTEST; Dorothy M. Ha.llin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SB. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of November, 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor t City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instiument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 6 of 7 CITY OF ORONO P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 473-7357 zoning: pile #1682 55323 NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Notice: 10/23/91 TO<Christine Brickley 3262 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 COPIES TO: TYPE OP APPLICATION: Variance VOTE: 6 For 0 AgainstDATB OP MBBTINGi 10/21/91 Planning Coanission reconmends the following: Approval subject to conditions noted below. HOTBS AMD 8PBCIAL CONDITIONS: Planning Conun. ’ Dn reconunended approval subject to: 1. 24' X 32' garage as proposed, 3.33' from west lot line, 10.56' from south lot line. 2. 8' X 32' remainder of slab to be removed. 3. 9x9 shed to be removed. 4. Pinal hardcover in 75-250' zone shall be limited to 3221 s.f. (46.9%). Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council Tuesday, November 12, 1991; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and upproval by the Planning Commission, m c NtNUTM er IHS OBONO PUNNING COMMISSION MEETING OP OCTOBER 21, #1626 - CONT. Chair Kelley felt that this is a better plan that the Traffs. Cohen agreed. new construction. A w^t-h Rowlette but felt that given previous milt im th?f;rop;rty. council «ill likely feel obligated to approve this request. Wilson noted that his jj^^^ship-^are ^he^same^as Jraf f ’ s^and^ the indicated that*the^plL'to recycle the existing buildings. Chair Kelley noted that if ”iest^side/^it *^would^ mLeperaanent driveway easement on the west siae. development of this lot much easier. It was moved by Johnson. by°Eric*^and^Kristal ^Wilson for the revised proposal construct a nev J«idSncr Xefa. nays 2. Rowlette and Bellows voted nay. (#4) #1682 CHRISTINE BRICKLEY. VARIANCE™ CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:35-7:50 P.M. Christine Brickley was present for th^s application. a. j a.w-1. s-K-ic i *s A revised proposal to construct a new Gaffron noted that this ® . . croposing a 768 s.f. garage, detached garage. The app ^ . noured slab The remainder of rh:^;;b‘u'’;ropoiL “?o ‘Se“ritained; a^f rlria [hr‘w"si JS? l?r ^oS?h^^^t^ine. Hardcover is unchanged. 1:111111 Sf1his'’‘sari*e:* -^“^"^quatr slintount Tt hardcover. Johnson asked if the previous slab was incorporated within the oew slab area. mtlim a“™inUe;d of th«e'’Su?ldIngs‘?h«rilu sll mtad the height of the garage has been reduce Chair Kelley noted that by retaining tH-^Ub. it Ruit. possibly o^: ?hf :.ra^" ind‘fo If ^ihrslab"*pSrtion to reaain. J;UTE5 OP THE OHONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OP OCTOBEH ... 1S9. #1682 - CONT. Johnson fait ?equast ii*'reasonable. Un:it^?hf:ajri^?ng s?:b'siLld n^t be allowad. B.UOWS noted that a hardship for the garage Is the storage of construction equipment. Btickley noted that Is correct. Bowlette noted that no matter «hat ts proposed, at wUl stall end up with a substandard setback. Gail Naffus. Casco P?i"‘ t^asdtng'^too'^iiiuch'^^and '’is only SSted that the neeS!. She noted that the is°In ’thr«Ict‘faae%pot as the previous garage and shed. * , j i_ rKa^T- K«»l lev to recommend It was moved by ,Igj”?or"^Christine Brickley. 3252 North approval of Application /“^.back variance and a hardcover ShSre Drive, for a ot 1^"' existing slab with the variance to construct a g ^m-^ed not larger than ^ provision that the q. the slab and the remaining 8 ofon the northern “°st portion of the si the slab to be removed. Ayes 6, n > (#4) #1683 ROBERT F. SUESS. , p.„. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING T.J. Haislet was P*'®**5\J°''i‘st%iSe'reqiesting”submitt^ of a Gaffron noted that ®"*j"®®ooieday'* be’^further subdivided. cSoH^"!* ‘«co.iendinr that, there may h® »°«® “®“?'i^‘Lage Tollny finishing the P®‘®i-?^Pr?ine ToipUted no- andalong Vatertown and the east lot ii „gighborhood would have suggSsting that drainage in the «®®fponding m the Sirth'easrci’rrer aftern drainage plan has been submitted. Chair r.lley asked if an extension has been considered of the fo&d to th6 north* mrri*viabu‘opUon S^ng^'cofn-ttorro^^^iesl!"" Haislet asked how the ^°“®j**^°"^®^’^the°^roL^^outlot, but is noted the “FP^icant would g ^^t_^ farther development, with a r®QUSSting only a priva ♦.-,*« thp drive.S^iowneri association to maintain t.ne aXH- c lAje^r ^ i6.S RCC»/vl*vUiMb(^ BV ft>A<Aa/A)<:, C£>l'WMimO'^ '>• A-S CiM^srtMXKVt^ CjtoOF ^E»5£^)s r To: Frc«: Date: Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator October 14, 1991 Subject: #1682 Christine Brickley, 3262 North Shore Drive Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing List of Exhibits A - Revised Garage Plan Submitted B - Staff Sketch, Revised Site Plan C - Notice of Planning Commission Action 9/16/91 D - Memo and Exhibits of 10/6/91 Discussion Applicants have revised their garage proposal, reducing size from 1056 s.f. to 768 s.f. (24* x 32'}. the The revised garage of 763 s.f. requires 15' setbacks from the west and south lot lines. Applicants propose to make use of the recently poured slab, hence the new proposal leaves a 10.5' setback to the south lot line and 3.3' to the west lot line. At your September meeting, applicant indicated that the garage and slab would not increase hardcover above the pre­ existing levels, because the previous garage and shed were positioned near the west lot line with gravelled parking area in front, hence the area covered by slab was already totally hardcovered. We have no photos or pre-existing survey to verify this, however, in this case hardcover in the 75-250' zone would remain at 50.6% with the current plan. Applicants propose to use the southerly 8' of the slab for boat and truck storage. Issues to Consider 1. Is there sufficient hardship or justification to grant a 4.5* south lot line setback variance and 11.7' side setback variance to allow the proposed garage? 2. Under the current proposal, lot coverage will stay at the pre-existing level of 17.5%. The 768 s.f. garage contains the equivalent enclosed space of the pre-existing shed, garage, and storage barn. Is there sufficient hardship or justification to grant a variance for 17.5% lot coverage? 3. If hardcover stays at its claimed pre-existing level of 50.6% in the 75-250' zone, is there hardcover in the 0-75' zone that could bo removed to compensate? • •. 'f Zoning File *1682 October 14, 1991 Page 2 Options for Recoanendation Planning Commission could consid-jr the following possible recommendations : 1. Approval as revised, with or without additional conditions. 2. 4. Isv Partial approval, subject to limitations on garage sise, location and/or concurrent hardcover removals (specify those conditions). 3. Denial. Table further, give applicant specific direction as to what further revisionsare necessary. 5. Other. r* A '/V t ..... J ho» 7 w.;UE3 7) f£l^ *U a ^ ^ c».v ^ r> fUvoc»<»u «4 ' f^4*x. ^ f - 3>- S 0~,y\^^ “gv f S -7 >^2;^ 5^-^ ^E\//iet> f/2oft)SAU /O'/l-^l r . / »‘f ‘ ‘ ' '»*‘ I f * '* ' ’•'V* • ! * •• f.M V,.' '** * « • I •: \ . • * • • «p • I ..-v :o‘ • 4 • 1 •‘.I ♦ V f - I • .• I* . • ■ • * • • ; I I • * . QB OO' I f r fieoPose^ (lie/isel^ 455.3 F- CITY OP ORONO P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bry, MM 473-7357 55323 ZONING FILE #1682 NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Notice: 9/17/91 TOi Christine Brickley 3262 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 COPIES TO TTPB OP APPLICATION: Variance I-' DATB OP iTIHGt 9/16/91 VOTE: 5 For 0 Against Planning Coanlssion rernrnds the following: Tabled for reasons noted below ■OTIS AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Tabled pending siibmittal by applicant of a revised proposal that more closely meets the hardcover, lot coverage and setback requirements. Please contact Nike Gaffron at the City Offices (473-7357) if you wish to discuss your options. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the October 21 meeting is October 11, 1991. If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (473-7357). If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. Isv I- I To:Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:September 6, 1991 8iibjec±: #1682 Christine Brickley, 3262 North Shore Drive Variance - Public Hearing Soni.n9 District: LR-lC~lf Single family lakeshore residential, 1/2 acre, unsewered Application: Request for variances to construct oversized accessory structure (garage) Variances Required: 1.Accessory structure footprint area in excess of 1,000 s.f. on lot less than 2 acres in area (Section 10.03, Subdivision 8 (C) (2). Lot is 0.28 acres. 2.Proposed detached garage of 1056 s.f., if allowed, would require 30* setbacks from lot lines (Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C) (3) (A). Proposed/"as poured" setbacks; West side: 3.33* South (rear): 2.56' Required: 33* 3.75-250* hardcover in excess of 25% allowance (Section 10.22, Subdivision 2) Pre-existing hardcover; 46.5% Proposed hardcover: 50.6% Mote: 0-75* hardcover is 15.6% where none is allowed. 4.Lot coverage in excess of 15% allowance (Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (O). Pre-existing lot coverage: 17.5% Proposed : 19.8% Bardship Stat Please see applicant's Letter of Request Liat of Bxhibita Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Application Plat Map Property Owners List Letter of Request ■ktah Zoning File #1682 September 6, 1991 Page 2 of 3 Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Discusiiion Survey Staff Survey/Hardcover Review Before/After Hardcover Proposals Municipal Sewer Location Diagram Garage Plan Submitted Inspection Notice 8/22/91 Applicant demolished the pre-existing 20' x 24' garage and removed fro:n the site a pre-existing 10' x 20' shed/barn structure without obtaining the necessary demolition permit. This came to the attention of City staff when applicant was found to be pouring a slab on the property August 22, 1991. The slao was half poured when discovered by the Building Inspector and a Stop Work Order was immediately posted. However, because concrete for the remainder of the slab was on the way and could not be returned, applicant was allowed to pour the remainder of the slab at applicant's risk. Applicant was advised that there is no guarantee that the slab and/or any garage proposed to be constructed on it, would meet the Code requirements, and continuing work was entirely at the applicant's risk. Applicant immediately ordered survey work, and upon submittal of the survey, as anticipated by staff, the proposed work did not meet Code in many respects. Staff review of the survey and field measurements indicate that the existing house was not accurately plotted by the surveyor in relation to the normal shoreline. Staff has slightly redrawn the shoreline to reflect field conditions, as well as confirm and correct the insufficient hardcover data supplied by the applicant. The City has to date not required permits for sidewalks, surfacing of driveways, or other grade level concrete pours, although quite often such work places a property owner in violation of the hardcover ordinance. Since construction of the garage itself had not been started nor were there garage construction materials on the site, technically the work to date did not need a permit. In this respect, the application for garage construction is not after-the-fact. The Building Inspectors have indicated that ir may be feasible to cut away portions of the slab and make use of the remainder using certain construction techniques. The Planning Commission should not therefore necessarily make the assumption that the slab would have to be entirely redone if some portion of the proposed work is approved. Zoning File #1682 September 6# 1991 Page 3 of 3 Issues to Consider 1. Is there any reasonable justification to allow a garage of any size to be located 2-3' from the rear and side lot lines? A garage 0-750 s.f. in area would normally require 10' setbacks from the side and rear lot lines for this lakeshore lot. A garage 751-1000 s.f. would require 15’ setbacks . 2. Because the lot is only 0.28 acres in area, is there any justification to grant a variance to allow an accessory structure in excess of 1000 s.f. footprint? 3. Is there any justification to allow lot coverage by structures to increase from 17.5% pre-existing to 19.8%, when the Code only allows 15%? Does the intent to provide enclosed storage for collector cars, masonary construction equipment, and other items currently stored outside on the property, justify the size garage proposed? Is the single large garage structure more appropriate for the site than a number of smaller buildings, from a visual perspective? Note that the applicants propose to remove the tin shed remaining on the property. 4. Is there any justification for approval of a hardcover increase from 46.5% (including the tin shed, old 20' x 24' garage, and old 10' x 20' barn) up to 50.6% in the 75-250' zone? Is there additional hardcover in the 0-75' or 75-250' zones that can be removed to mitigate the additions? Note that the driveway and parking area is part of a shared loop driveway serving two other residences. Options for Recosmendatlon Planning Commission might wish to consider the followino possible recommendations: 1. Denial . 2. Partial approval, subject to limitations on garage size, location and/or concurrent hardcover removals (specify those conditions). 3. Approval as proposed, with or wxthout additional conditions. 4. Table, giving applicant direction as to what type of plan revisions might result in a positive recooimendation. 5. Other. lav pc r ST- ^ ■ A I t il. * f ■ ^ w CITY OP ORONO - VARIANC2 APPLICATION ( initial Application EeeQ^lTS^C^ ' .j;, ($50.00 per each additional varianc- i *' ^ Renewal Variance AsEa/ (no change from original application; ^ After-the-Fact Fees (Double application^.^-^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ property location Sit. Address Oi.'k. ^ Property Identification ^ leat'nlt""^c it'de^n^ requlrea _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _--YZr:r^'*E^PT-nm YOU Phone jii:^ applicant ^ ^ 09/21/9 r*(utsb<^ O^ddjUj_______Phone !wor3c)Jilfr22Sl -------- Ol~ rifv: Or»>iO_____ Zip:.SS5i---- Address ? ^TSaL^ _____________-3 _________________________________________ 5j^Mg ii (if different than applicant) Phone (home)_ . Phone (work)_ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ __ Name - - - - --- - - - --- -- - - - - --— City:__ _ _ _ _ _ ____2ip-- - - - - - - Address:- - - - - --- - - - - - - - -- ._ ^ (month/year) Date Property Acquired- - - - - - -—- - - -- I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ present 08* OF PROPER^ Present Zoning District ,_, - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - -‘ 440M.ia. //CAOi^V*— Residentialpresent Use of Property - - -li- - -L - - -- Other (specify) _____________ Estimated Construction Cost $---------------OESGRIFTICEi OF REQOBST ^ D«ecribe request in detail.,JiSe-- -—---- - -- <jVve^ UJl-Hh AiAn ------------------------------------------ BQOZSm) T^4- width Hardcover_ _ _ Lot Area _ _ __ width __ _ _ _ - /sTd^ _ _Setbac)c Variances (_____ Front ----—^ / Other t.IMU)SHIPDescribe undue hardship cr practical difficulty resulting from stric enforcement of zoninc regulations; --------- -9xr\. ou«-^v^ _ _ _ ^ • f. •/ r. % CRIPTION OP ONUSDAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with zoning Code Requirements : .^rr\JLLJ^ Le^ <fv^ ^ ------- iBQOiimsDwaTOtts'^ Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners fist of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin Couacy Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtainfed with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8i{"xll" for reproduction ). . Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8J5"xll"). , Sketches or plans of floor 4 elevation views (provide 1 copy 8i5"xll‘'). • As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. . Additional items as may be requested by City staff. Il0 Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please •■ember that yoor variance application is not complete if the__above [ja^OCTa'ti.on has not been included. rPLlCAMT'S SIGNATURE |l0 applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or •quested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pa- additional fees (staff not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses ueurred in review of this a^lication, and certifies that the information applied is true and correcWtt the best^^f his/her Icnowledge^ ___________ pplicant's Signature ^ ^ w v ■Date IVISN 8Z6NAT0RB 'lie owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further iUthorixes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, gents. Commission member^and CounciIjjembers for purposes of investiga- ion and verificatiop'^of^^hiV request. "2^ (.*7 / Imer's Signature V ^ _ _ _ _ Date —- - - - - - - -- ^Xlcant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the leaning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the ^ird Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheJuled mmmtlnqm o£ the Planning CitbIsalon and Council. If an applicant is •able to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an Bthorized agent attend in your place and t-. advise the Building 4 Zoning ^fiee of this change prior to the meeting. / */ /> • »r «• ». • • •, * • MA x^/VE LL BA Y •• V • *.* ** ^ ^ ' “ V* I 'V i'.- m ^m '• 4 «oa^ • . -L #• • ^ 0 n V '7.. raop Aoon IMCR KAHC TAKRAYill NAHE/AOOR SB OS-117-2S A1 0011 0SaS6 NOIITH SHORE DR RITA H STRALEY R H A S E STRALEY SOM TUXEDO DLVO HOUND m S5SAA PROP ADOR OltCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR SB 0B-117-ES A4 0034 D5S02 NORTH SNORE OR HINNETONRA PROPERTIES INC JAMES J DUNN SEE4 NORTH SHORE OR ORONO MN 55S91 SB 08-117-2S 41 0012 0SS24 NORTH SHORE DR MINNETONKA PROPERTIES IfK JAMES J DUrtI S224 NORTH SHORE OR ORONO MN 55S91 SB 0e-117-2S 44 0010 0^ MTiiTM SHORE OR P • M • ^ANLEY R M A S E STRALEY 5034 TUXEDO BLVD HOUND MN 55364 u^ •RUN DAT! 0a/2S/fl HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM REPORT PROPERTY OFtCRS LIST BATCH 001 SB 08-117-2S 41 0005 SB 08-117-23 41 0006 38 08-117-2S 41 0007 : u PROP ADDR OS240 NORTH SHORE OR 03250 NORTH SHORE OR 03260 NORTH SHORE DR 0M4IR NAHE L HORK A 0 HORK L HORK I 0 HORK VERA M MARTIN TAKRAYER LARRY HORK LARRY HORK JAMES J DUNN NAHE/AOOR C/O NORTH SHORE DR MARINA C/O NORTH SHORE DR MARINA 5224 NORTH SHORE OR c S222 NORTH SHORE OR 3222 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55S91 ORONO MN 55391 SB 06-117-2S 41 0008 30 08-117-23 41 0009 38 08-117-23 41 0010 RROR AOOR 0S242 NORTH SHORE DR 03268 NORTH SHORE OR 03290 NORTH SHORE OR1OMCR NAME CHRISTINE N BRICKLEY RONALD D STAUFFER RITA M STRALEY TAXPAYER CHRISTINE H BRICKLEY RONALD 0 STAUFFER R M I S E STRALEY NAHE/AOOR S262 NORTH SHORE DR 3268 N SHORE DR 5034 TUXEDO BLVD HAYZATA m 55391 HAYZATA MN 55391 MOLffA) m 55364 NO. P14S540I PAGE 1 38 06-117-2S 44 0001 03264 NORTH SHORE OR RICHARD O NORUM ET AL RUSSELL A NORUM 15500 HAYZATA BLVD UNIT 1003 HAYZATA ft4 55S91 TOTAL BATCH 001 00011 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS Of THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPE|TfY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEOGE AND BELIEF DATE »ARTMENT { o i). „ vi ■J 'O o fj 4 kJ 'U (Maxwell ■ i’ *• ''P-• fi-.:• V .W J I. K- :4 •' kl.'* ■■ i)?-; ■• •■; I ff' ■■ - # • J- V: • ir. •»t: h- O') o uJ •/) I /'■ ■■ --s \ ,^\C I6'i>/<f feujuuo s p/z- <3c^ lO-<vv-<i,ZWV\ A^'^-ciL c20 ^ - K jyvA^^-is y<v^ U>C yjiT^uJLA. fCueQ <K jC j*- bu-jLi-. tOc ^-fix-^x oi IjLA^n^?is_ _/KM-€4^ _3p^i^ >K. ’+t^ olclL U j-C_ IqlCa^u^ ‘i(tf^A*^r^. % __________________ .cytu-Ai^ “^f _C^Vtcb‘^/'^i»-<^ CJ>JU CL^ -44^\J^___C^L4^ — . _k5*. ........Ofi-XJ <v^ S-cH (^•jcc^t^ ®-'<-<>->^ crwico 3:7 04JL -i lAi»rL- fV p OV^ - ^"trv ck JLX a-| ^-ci Ux«_ fVJU-^ . «- ____ 3sn UJ<2_ fW<jL ,C^<A~:^dhr:::^ ^Ou_xt^ ASU a -. . JTC- C lM^ U>0^ _ _9-_ A-cC tcAli- U mJUI lo’C^- <Uy;2^ ..S-Qs^ iix^ /QrJ^ ^tJLx^-^t/^i__1 11 4 HARDCOVER CALCDLATIC:piC£KSHEEl Sc£T3AC:< ZONE: (CI?!CLH CNc/ 0*/^ -»^ /> !250-300' 5CO-1CCO' Existing Hardcover in Icne A. House X LENGTH - X Bi Garage c. D riveway D. Sidewalk X E. Patio/B eck jJ_ F. Landscape AREAS underlain BY PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other iL VVo WIDTH Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property A rea in Zone 3 S.F. S • F t S.F. S.F. . S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. _ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. _ S.F. S.F. { V 3 f ;/l 6^^ S.F. B 3 X 100 /?t3 % NttWi LENGTH WIDTH HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET—x SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0*75' Existing Hardcover in Zone A, House O'-U-j.L'.b S.F. X S I r . s. ' i>. % * * > • 5 I ' • • . I i> \o fO pieofosc^ J^A^oco\/eit •V »r . G& oa' k ... K ^ L ! ^ • •» • I »’. • « »•* 5 •, i* • ':K k’ I - i t * *•"*•1.01 ' w *. *■ * ^ • • ^ • • ft ■•• “• ; f^O^.. m < • ft _ isxfr^.' « %. . i • • . I 140,2 . •- - . . w- • A « o j r.. ^, i-. ^ § •v^'% ft-9« • ; (Aj NH>Jr,:£>w^-.i-':' '. ~ .1 i:-: I I T“ri ^ _ f ^ -.. i r CITY of OROXO Cl rv 1 ORONO.D. M Post Offit* Box 66•Crystal Bay. .Minnesota 55323 • MuiuapaJ Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka January 17, 1990 Norman Carlson 3262 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Dear Mr. Carlson: Currentlv there is a sanitary sewer 1 that irowned and n,aintained by the .Metrono 1 r .an was.e Conunission. ry c 1 AS a result of the ^ Jl?ving‘the ownership of M.W.C.C.r the City of \\ne -uns into a lift station at that sewer Im®- Bemuse of the installation of the new3200 North Shore Drive. Becau orono can lift station by Maxwell star: Drive. In ordereliminate the lift station at 3200^Nc.^.h^Sho^^^^ ^ to accomplish this, we wil , ^ i- is now flowing. will flow in the ^V|n"tcur crooertv allowing that There are permanent easements However in order to sewer line and need temoorary easements fromplace a new sewer line, we win you. A temporary easement ®Wows w^s to place d.r., M line, equipment on your property -1 the Once its pment on your restore the property ► the ^®//^j.\our review and file i original concition tW.oorary easement nee< to s a il concition. ^“7‘‘Vi-hV *Viroo-ary easement needed L'%UOucVthV;r;,V:l^ ^-L'uId^^hVe^t^ -pfn construct > A • February or March. «■ h' s information so that we Please call me upon receipw ^jT'iTe reached at 473-7357. can schedule meetings with you. I can be reac.heo Sincerely, / <r John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director jRG/tln ■IILOING A ZONING - 47J.T3r assessing admimstrmion a riNANCt - 4 ”)-'3« ► AX - 4*34)510 »PI HLIC WORK5 ■ 4*'-*J« •{--.V • • • date Time CITY OF ORONO INSPECTION NOTICE PERMIT NO called IN SCHEDULED I ADDRESS OWNER _ 3____________________COMPLETED d O Ml7r.J:— ________________CONTR. w //.VoTn TELEPHONE NO. g DESCRIPTION U| 01FOODNO « 02FIUMINQ 2 03 INSULATION § (MINAUBO. J OSPINAL C 07 0GMO-SITE 11 MECHANICAL R» 16 WELL PUMP 11 MECHANICAL FINAL 18 EXCAV ’GRADlNG/FILLfNG 24/25 WOOD BURNER-FIREPLACE 19 LAKE SHORE/WETLANDS 12 WATER HOOK UP 13 METER SET,TURN ON 14 SEWER HOOK UP 27 SEPTIC MAINT 19 SEPTIC INSTAU. 23 SEPTIC RNAL S OWNdVCONTfUCTOflTOMEETVOU:__YES — NO ^ 07 0EMO-FINAL S OSPtUMBINam ^ 10 PLUMBING FINAL 34 TREE REMOVAL 17 SITE INSPECTION 06 PROGRESS 21 COMPLAINT 22 FOLLOW-UP I COMMEN 'I V ' • * J* U. Uf <oef>Wf L/^f / e I ufftlA- <aV f>/ ij lA e/:-^ re ^Sj b ■ I 0^m • • • - • - • •• iS □ WONKSATWPACTOnr. , * □ counter WOWLBPWOCgED a OOMWCT MONK. CALL FOR REMSPECriON KPORiOOWtRmO □ OORRCCTUNSAFBOONIXnON WITHIN------ •NSPCCTOR «MU nCTURN ‘ROJECT COMPLETE ISSUE certificate of occupancy ________TEMPORARY _______permanent STOP OROtR POSTED. CAa inspector msPCcnoN requirco. cau to arrange access C PHOTO taken C CITATION ISSUED Cat for tlw noxt InspBcUon 24 hours in advancB. 473“7357 OwmariContng^ arfsita:--------------------------------------------------- insp octor__p, \c2aL^------------------------------------------------ npuTnur—CAnMyCdpWSIMNouc* / fc- - ■ LL' m,C Ti* ,>* , • « N/* • •• . •. .• ■ --rV> ' ^ :,■•;% V>‘‘> t . .;'i;: ^-rrvr ■ - i • ■. 1 ■ A»,« f i * V k* ’ V* f-V V * ; •■ •*...• i • •- : r « t •••l. •••».%• , I u. . •/ *>Vi . *vi i* • i'irt• .* •r • < * • .’I . kiMMUPril«- •« i - V/, ,V J.-*' 4 r ^4 . i 4 9"' ^ i- /tr'i t> w-V > I ' I * W«.5/ Q3.0C „ T f^orA<^----------- __________________________________0--?S' *. .vr-ZTtJ'_ . <4 _Srt>o<*^ >f/0 ^1 ,^, ^,, r «.*i Ho , t/o--------- A , LOAiJC Z.SK2U ?o ^o .... . C. A/o-1^Ajor\ys:,.suo /2*»U t>5_Oecjc ^fe’x io'3U0 -3^0______ ^ • Stw^_3xs:___/S'. • ------------ «____/S __ __ ?;¥C*__12.12. 4 • SlA'A A*0«» “ios^_, /OST. ._ . . . H-- DtClVC A»'-^-/V2-« . _/V3-S „ /i 2-2. —■ 9 'ic :■ 3'V‘7*7%C -ys/<? s.C - - T Si^SO “‘Jacs ‘/s C.VT - re P<v«>« "5 or / ~ VV«.s/^, QQ, OO /Vppi0D\y(2£> HAj^coxre^ HAiv>co^e^ TO MAve^ iS-asAi /0«r>«veti P(^i?VfoM5*-'V ' 9-s' *1.? ' sktrCi 2o v z'^ ^/VCAC-^ /<3 ;«• ADt>'TZCN>».<- S't3Z' SXA6 RANDUM TO:Jeanne Mabusth ^ '</* V FROM: TJBarrett DATE; January 10, 1992 / RE I Number 1701, Phyllis Sprague - Variance to Non-conforming Uae Section Jeanne: As we have discussed, the above—referenced application '’'arently had to do with the request to install an accessory r«.,«idential use in a commercially-roned property that had ceased to be used residentially in about 1983. The Orono City Code and the statutes of Minnesota do not eilow non~confociriiiq uses to be continued if they have been abandoned for more than one year. As I understand the facts of this case, the residential use has been abandoned in a way that prevents It from being resumed. It follows that an accessory residential use is equally disallowed; however, it may be that the accessory use that th applicant seeks to employ would be consistent with the cc/ainereial zoninq of the property# and the applicant should be encouraged to ozamine her proposed use of the property in a way thet would allow commercial use. This would include, of course, the obligation of the party to come forward with a corwnerciai site plan proposal that would be consistent with the zoning and that would be approved by the City. With respect tc the rezoning, it is clear that the City’s power to rezone in this case is constrained because rezoning a single residential lot may be prohibited as spot zoning. A comprehensive rezoning cf the area might allow the Council to step back and take a look at the entire area and to define a zoning plan that is consistent both with the comprehensive plan end With the best interests of the property owners In the area. However^ I would .Wise great caution about a single lot rezoning that created a residential use in the middle cf a commercial lone. I will send this memorandum directly to the members of the Council since we are getting to the point where the packet must be mailed. l will fax a copy to you for your review. Pl**ee call me If you have any questions or comments before the Monday meeting. TJB733 ? m f- ‘>i; ir'* /■'J TO; PROH: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator January 9, 1992 > SOBJBCT: Resolution Designating Appointments for 1992 The attached resolution designates the annual appointments for 1992. Please note the new prosecuting attorney has been added. I! O O // / / J: CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ____________ ■ A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING SELECTED APPOINTMENTS FOR THE YEAR 1992 BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota that the appointments and designations for the year 1992 are as follows: APPOIMTMENT/DESIGMATION Acting Mayor Planning Commission Rep. to Council Park Commission Chair Representative to Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Representative to Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Legislative Liaison AMM AMM Legislative Contact Lead Attorney (Civil) City Attorney Firm (Civil) Alternate Attorney Lead Prosecuting Attorney City Prosecuting Attorney Firm Lead Engineer City Engineering Firm Auditor Fiscal Agents Insurance Agent of R*" cord 1992 Alternate Richard Flint JoEilen Hurr Ron Moorse Ron Moorse J. Diann Goetten Tom Barrett Popham, Haik, Schnobrich, Kaufman and Doty William Soth, Dorsey & Whitney Laurel Mersey City of Minnetonka Glenn Cook Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates Malloy, Karnowski & Co. Ehlers & Associates Duweyne P. Carlson Apple Valley Insurance • • i.I- o //o o V V, vV’Ck i! > % ') 4* CITYofORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ______ APPOINTMENT/DESIGNATION Weed Inspector Assistant Weed Inspector Transportation Committee Emergency Preparedness Director Southwest Sanitary Sewer District Suburban Health Nursing Service West Hennepin Recycling Commission Mayor's Association Suburban Rate Authority West Tonka Senior Citizens Minnesota Police Recruiting System West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board (2 Plus Alternate) Building Code Board of Appeals Development Committee Hennepin Emergency Communications Organization 1992 Barbara Peterson John Gerhardson John Gerhardson Stephen X. Sullivan Ron Moorse Ron Moorse John Gerhardson Barbara Peterson John Gerhardson Ron Moorse (Alternate) Barbara Peterson Stephen X. Sullivan Ron Moorse (Alternate) Dale Woodbeck LaDean McWilliams David Use Steve Andersen, Mtka Fire Insp Tom Anderson, Hopkins Building Official Maureen Bellows, AIA Architect Jim Hanson, Builder Theodore Paulfranz, Edina Fire Chief Public W-^rks Director City Engineer Building & Zoning Admin. Ron Moor«*e Stephen X. Sullivan (Alternate) ^ -»- // // /1 o ^04; o 11 V ' \\>k t>.lV"\ ^ CITY of ORONO V' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________ APPOINTMENT/DESIGNATION 1992 North Tonka Crime Prevention Coalition Board of Directors Stephen X. Sullivan :5/9/93) Barbara Peterson (5/9/93) Highway 12 Appointments: Policy Committee Technical Committee Citizens Committee Housing and Redevelopment Authority Lake Use Committee Barbara Peterson J. Diann Goetten (Alternate) John Gerhardson Mary Butler/J. Diann Goetten George Johnson Eleanor Winston John Kassopust (Alternate) Gabriel Jabbour, Chair Mary Butler# Vice Chair Charles M. Kelley, Secretary Barbara Peterson J. Dainn Goetten Edward Callahan Edward Callahan, Chair J. Diann Goetten, Vice Chair Gabriel Jabbour Charles Kelley Charles Schroeder JoEllen Hurr Jeanne A. Mabusth, Secretary Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at meeting held January 13, 1992. regular Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk AfMCtotM %.mrnm • OrOmiii M. MM « Owner Cily of Orono, 13.^5 Brown Road, Crystal Bay, MN 55232 Dale December 5, 1991 For Period November 1, 1991 to December 1, 1901 Request No. 2 Contractor B & D Underground, Inc., 1351 Co Rd. 8.^, Manic Plain, MN 55359 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT Trunk Highway 12 Frontage Road Sewer, Water. & Street Improvements Project No. 91-2 File No. 13951 r, - 1 , SUMMARY 1 Original Contract Amount 2 Change Order • Addition 3 Change Order - Deduction 4 Revised Contract Amount 5 Value Completed to Date 6 Material on Hand 7 Amount Ea<ned 8 Less Rclainage 5% 9 Sub'Total 10 Less Amount Paid Previously 11 AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. Recommended for Approval by: BONESTRQ0. ROSENE, ANDERLIK ft ASSCOATES. INC. S $ 16.550.50 Approved by Contractor: BAD UNDERGROUND. INC. Approved by Owner: CTTY OF ORONO, MN Specified Contract Completion Date: Nov. 15, 91 • Substantial; June 30, 91 • Final Date: tlMlRfr 188,786.00 $205336.50 $118,604.21 $0.00 $118,604.21 s 5,930.21 s 112,674.00 $52,484.46 s 60,189.54 ronlracl tinll Qiianllty NmoonI Ilcm Unit Qitiintify Price To Dote To Date part A - 5%anStary Sewer 1 8* PVC, 10'. 12’ dp. in pi.LF 40 15.00 87 1305.00 2 8* PVC, 12'-14' dp. in pi.LF 20)15.00 250 3,7.^00 3 8* PVC, 14’- 16’ dp. in pi.LF 200 J5.00 200 3,000.00 4 8" PVC, 16’-18' dp. in pi.LF KA)15.00 200 3.000.00 5 8* PVC, 18’- 20’ dp. in pi.LF 60 25.00 20 500.00 6 6’ PVC sewer service line LF lOlK)60 600.00 7 Std. 4' dia. manhole 8' dp. w/1642B vstg. in place EA 3 995.00 3 2,985.00 8 Manhole depth greater than 8' deep LF 23 58.00 21.5 1,247.00 9 8” X 6* wye branch EA 2 50.00 2 100.00 10 Cut Into existing 8’’ VCP EA 1 300.00 1 300.00 11 Mechanical trench compaction LF 820 0.65 817 531.05 12 Improved pipe foundation per 6* depth increment in place LF 750 1.00 757 757.00 13 Television inspection LF 760 1.00 Total Part A • Sanitary Sewer $18,075.05 Part R - Water Main 14 6* DIP, Class 52 water main LF 50 1560 30 468i» 15 8* DIP, Class 52 water main LF S75 15.60 840 13.104.00 16 12* DIP, Class 52 wa<er main LF 580 20.85 545 11363.25 17 6’ resilient wedge GV and box EA 2 .340.00 2 680.00 18 8" resilient wedge GV and box EA 7 4AI.00 5 2,200.00 19 12* resilient wedge GV and box EA 2 795 2 1,590.00 20 5* valve hydrant EA 2 i.ioo.a)2 2.200.00 21 Connect to exist, water line (wet tap)EA 1 1,440 00 tn Imp ^rtit tn^EA 1 300.00 1 300.00 23 Cl. flttings LB 4,500 085 4,18T 3,-55725 14 Medianical trench compaction LF 1,510 020 l,4i:283B0 2S Improved pipe foundation per 6* tfeptb increments in place LF 300 0.80 300 240.00 36 Clear and grub trees EA .j 85.00 27 7,295JO. Total Part B - Water Main $38,28030 1M1.IUT RP 1 ___u Ifem Lnti Confrurt Qunnilly Unit Prtce Quanllly To D«l« Amovnl To Dftit i Part C - Slnriti Sewer 27 12* RCP Class V in place 28 18" RCP, Class III in place 29 21* RCP, Class HI in place 30 Std. CBMH W/3067V casting 31 Std. catch basin w/3067V casting 32 21" RCP flared end w/trasbguard 33 ir RCP flared end w/lrashguard 34 Riprap in place 33 Type 1 fiter blanket 36 Siltation/erosion control fence, Mirafi "Envirofence* 37 Improved pipe foundation per 6* depth increment in place 38 Mechanical trench compaction Total Part C - Storm Sewer Part D - Strggt 39 Common excavation 40 Granular borrow 41 Oass 3 aggregate base 42 Class 5 100% crushed quarry limestone aggregate base 43 Type 31 base course mixture 44 Type 41 wear course mixture 43 AC-1 bit. material for mixture 46 Bit. material for tack coat 47 2341 bit. materisl for patchmg 48 B618 concrete curb & gutter 49 Reinforcing for curb 50 Sod with topsoil 51 Seeding 52 Geotextile fabric UfSI.RIT RP-2 LF 160 15.00 110 1,650.00 I.F 370 17.00 370 6,290.00 LF 75 20.00 70 1,400.00 EA 3 988.00 2 1,976.00 EA 2 856.00 2 1,712.00 EA 1 650.00 1 650.00 EA 1 480.00 1 480.00 CY 3 40.00 SY 2 10.00 LF 250 1.80 LF 300 0.80 200 160.00 LF 510 0.20 5*'0 iiooiy $14,428.00 CY 5.500 1.25 5,430 6,787.50 CY 2,000 7.25 1,100 7,975.00 TN '‘400 5.70 TN 1,750 9J0 15.12 143.64 TN 550 16J0 , TN 275 20.00 TN 47 135.00 GL 300 IJO TN 20 64.00 12.83 821.12 LF 1,460 5.60 LF 200 0.75 SY 4,000 130 AC 1 900.00 SY 3,500 1.^i.400 1,680.00 r Itfin Tnll ('ontrncl Quanllly Unit Price Qunntlf? To Dale Amount To Dolt I? r :* 53 4* subdrain per detail Total Part D - Street s AAt^iwtiim Nn. I - Part B - Watfff Main 54 Casing for 8* DIP 55 Casing for 12* DIP Total Addendum No. 1 Oritgr No. t 56 6* DIP, Class 52 water main 57 8* DIP. Class 52 water main 58 ir DIP, Clau 52 water main 59 16” DIP, Class 52 water main 60 tT resilieot wedge GV and box 61 8^ resilient wedge GV and box 62 12” butterfly valve and box 63 16” butterfly vahre and box 64 5* valve hydrant 65 Connect to exist, water line (wet tap) 66 C.I. fittings 67 Mechanical trench compaction 68 Improved pipe foundaliot ,>er 6* depth increments in place 69 Casing for ir DIP Total Change Order No. 1 Total Part A - Sanitary Sewer Total Part B - Water Main Total Part C • Storm Sewer Total Part D • Street Total Addendum No. 1 Total Change Order No. 1 Total Work Completed to Date 800 5.R0 tmiMvr LF LF RP-3 45 ()0 118.00 118.00 $17,407.26 5.310.00 $5,310.00 LF 50 15.60 43 670.80 LF (35)15.60 LF 410 20.85 410 8,548.50 LF 250 28.00 225 6,300.00 EA 2 340.00 2 680.00 EA (1)440.00 EA 2 795.00 2 1,590.00 EA 2 1,660.00 2 3320.00 EA 2 1,100.00 2,200.00 EA (1)1,440.00 LB 2,000 0.85 1,810 133830 LF 670 0.20 678 USjM LF 130 0.80 150 120.00 LF (60)118.00 $25,103.40 18,075il5 38.280JO 14.428^10 17,407 J6 5310i» 75.10340 $118,604.21 * r i li:' Project Project No. FBeNa PAYMENT STATUS City of Oronc Trk Hwy 12 Frontage Road Sewer, Water & Street Improvements 91-2 13951 B & D Undergtround, Ine. CHAtWE ORDERS Na Dele 1 10-10-91 Additional work At $16,550.50 Total Change Orders - Add $16,55030 lA. Na 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 r SUMMARY Period Start 11-1-91 lM-91 .2-1-91 Payment $52,484.46 60,1«').54 RetaifiafB $2,76234 5.930.21 Completed $55,246S0 118.604.21 Total Payment to Dale Retaiaagf, Payment No. Total Vahie Completed $112,674.00 5,930.21 $118,604.21 Origiazl Contract Change Orders Revised Contract $188.786i» 163:030 >33630 IlMIJtFF RP-4 ^ • ___ n Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Otto G **E Aocxvf J/ Itoiene **£ JOtepf^ C Arvi^^iit P€ Mjrvir L Scr,i.j Pf e^c^^ € ^yjfrte* « ‘.CX5C T»vrr^l ? V:n^ **£ faocr^ Z f*i iu«r V CPA Engineers & Architects Krfh A Gcxoon f'E ihcr'^ JU Coster P£ Don4*d C Burtjjr*. Pf >fTv A Bo^rruv P£ A p^ ■ ►^Kj PF Micn^ T ffjofrrt4nn Pf *DOe»i P^p^*Ae P' CJV<J O JDVtCXi p? ’^•xynas W Aptmon P£ Mc^Je^ C L/rich P£ 9 ^AaUr<I Pf P ArxJp'Vjn P£ M«hi ff Ac;A PE Aooerr C lfuis«. a : a Thorrvii £ Angtii p£ mosa wtJ a Sjn^t»n3 P£ J E^jgerror P£ A Se?a P£ p^iiiO j Cai\A«« P£ »smje< Mamript. ®£ M4rtt C X*> 'S. P£ Trom^S «? Ajxiprv:'' A i A G-irv P 9>UnOer p£ B jef>ser> PE Ph<Pc Grjv^ T **£ •P^ C Piurrmt AiA V’W ^ AiCP ieny 0 ^ftzicn P£ Cec ’o OPvter pe i^ooett • Dp;0«cw PE Mor<er* P£ »*Pr» t X'ierT>en P£ iCiHth 9 nop P£ C'-^'VS A Enckjon Lj PO M Pji%en»cy Mjoin M Ohon January 7, 1992 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Mr. John Gerhardson JC.-,, JA/\f j Re: T.H. #12 Frontage Road Sewer. Water & Street Irriprs. Project 91-2 Our File No. 13951 Dear John, Enclosed please find Request for Payrneni No. 3 for the above referenced project. This portion of the work has been satisfactorily completed and we recommend payment. If you have any questions, piease contact me. Yours very truly. i^e;^troo , ROSENE, ANDERLIK Si A.SSOCIATES, INC Hailan M, Olson HMO:li End. 13951.cor 233S Wipst Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 551!3 • 612-636-4600 • 35th Anniversary I Sonttffoo iditn# And^^ik & Aiioctatei Owner City of Orono, 1335 Brown Road, Crystal Day, MN 552.12 Date January 7, 1992 For Period December 1, 19^1 to January 1, 1992 Request No. 3 Confi actor B & D Unde*’grnund, Inc., 1351 Co. Rd. 83, Maple Plain, MN 55.^59 REQUCST rOR PAYMHNT Trunk Highway 12 Frontage Road Sewer, Water, & Street Improvements Project No. 91-2 Flic No. 13951 SUMMARY 1 OriginaJ Contract Amount 2 Change Order • Addition 3 Change Order - Deduction 4 Revised Contract Amount 5 Value Completed to Date 6 Material on Hand 7 Amount Famed $ s 16,550.50 8 Less Rctainage 5% 9 Sub-Total 10 Less Amount Paid Previously 11 AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. Rccooimcndeii for Approval by: IH 5TRWI. ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASSCXTATES, INC. Af^roved by Contractor: BAD UNDERGROUND, INC Appros^ed by Owner CITY OF ORONO, MN SpeciFied CoAtrad Compleiioa Date: No*. 15, 91 - SobalutiaJ, June 30, 91 • Final Date; 188,786.00 205,336 JO 159J4934 0.00 159J49.34 7,97747 151,571.8? 112,674.00 38,897J7 I9I5IRFP 1 8* PVC, 10 ’- 12' dp. m pi. 2 8" PVC, 12'- 14* dp. in pi. 3 8" PVC. 14'- 16' dp. in pi. 4 8" PVC, 16’- 18 ’ dp. in pi. 5 8* PVC, 18 ’- 20 ’ dp. in pi. 6 6" PVC sewer service line 7 Sid. 4’ dia. manhole 8 ’ dp. w/1642B cstg. in place 8 Manhole depth greater than 8 ‘ deep 9 8* X 6" wye branch 10 Cut into existing 8" VCP 11 Mechanical trench compaction 12 Improved pipe foundation per 6" depth increment in place 13 Television iaspectiun Total Part A - Sanitary Sewer Pari B - Water M.ain I»Si W? Conlract Qnnntll? llnil Prire LF LF LF LF LF LF EA LF EA EA LF LF LF 40 200 200 260 60 60 3 23 2 1 820 750 760 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 25.00 10.00 995.00 58.00 50.00 300.00 0.65 1.00 1.00 RM Quanflly To Dole 87 250 200 200 20 60 3 21.5 2 1 817 Amoiinl To DiU 1.305.00 3.750.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 500.00 600.00 2.985.00 1.247.00 100.00 300.00 531.05 757.00 S 18,075.05 14 6" DIP, Class 52 water main LF 50 15.60 30 468.00 15 8" DIP, Class 52 water main U’875 15 60 840 13,104.00 16 12* DIP, Class 32 water main LF 580 20.85 575 11,988.75 17 6* resilient wedge CIV and box EA 2 340.00 2 68000 18 8" resilient vi-dge GV and box FA 7 440(10 5 2,200.00 19 12* resM.H'^ wedge GV and box EA 3 795.00 2 1,590.00 20 5" valve hydrant EA 2 1,100 00 2 2,200 00 21 Connect to exist, water line (wet tap)EA 1 1,440.00 22 Connect to exist, water line (cut in)EA 1 300.00 I 300.00 23 C.I. fittings LB 4,500 0.85 4,495 3,820.75 24 Mechanical trench compactimi LF 1,510 o.»1,445 28900 23 Improved pipe found.3tion per 6* depth increments in place LF 300 0.80 240.00 26 Clear and trees EA 15 85iX)27 7,704 rm Total Part B - Water Main 139.17550 Conlrncl t nil Quantity Amannl !tfm tnll Quantity PHcf To Onlf To Oatf Part C * Scwci 27 12' RCP, Class V in place I.F 160 15.00 261 3,915.00 28 18" RCP, Class III in place LF 370 17.00 380 6,460.00 29 21" RCP, Class III in place LF 75 20.00 70 1,400.00 30 Std. CBMH W/3067V casting EA 3 988.00 3 2,964.00 31 Std. catch basin w/3067V casting EA 2 856.00 3 2,568.00 32 21" RCP Hared end w/trashguard EA 1 650.00 1 650.00 33 12" RCP Hared end w/trashguard EA 1 480.00 1 480.00 34 Riprap in place CY 3 40.00 35 Type 1 fiter blanket SY 2 10.00 36 Siltation/erosion control fence. Mirafi "Envirofcncc”LF 250 1.80 50 90.00 37 Improved pipe foundation per 6* depth increment in place LF 300 0.80 200 160.00 38 Mechanical trench compaction LF 510 0.20 641 128.20. Total Part C - Storm Sewer $18,815 JO part D - Street 39 Common excavation CY 5,500 1.25 5,430 6,787-30 40 Granular borrow CY 2,000 7.25 2,671 19364.75 41 Clasa 3 aggregate base TN 2,400 5.70 U30J3 7382.88 42 Class 5 100% crushed quarry limestone aggregate base TN 1,750 950 1,031.52 9,799.44 43 Type 31 base course mixture TN 550 16J0 44 Type 41 wear course mixture TN 275 20.00 45 AC-1 bit. material for mixture TN 47 135.00 46 nil. material for lack coat GL 3<)0 1.80 47 2341 bit. material for patching TN 20 64.0t1 1283 821.12 43 B618 concrete curb A gutter LF 1,460 5.60 49 Reinforcing for curb LF 200 0.75 50 Sod with Io^?s«mI SY 4,00U IJO 51 Seeding AC 1 900,00 52 Gcotcxlilc fabric SY .3,5<10 2,915 3,498.00 IJWIRfT RP2 N®.Item Lnll Controcl Quantity (/nil Price Qoflnffty To Date Amount To Date 53 4* subtlrain per dclail Total Part D - Street 800 5.80 750 -4350.00- $52,203.69 Addendum Nn. 1 - Part B - Water Main 54 Casing for 8" DIP 55 Casing for 12* DIP Total Addendum No. I LF LF 45 60 118.00 118.00 5310.00 $5310.00 Jf .H• ' « CItange flrder No. 1 56 6* DIP. Class 52 water main 57 8* DIP, Class 52 water main 58 12* DIP, Class 52 water main 59 16" DIP, Class 52 water main 60 6* resilient wedge GV and box 61 8* resilient wedge OV and box 62 12" butterfly valve and box 63 16* butterfly valve and box 64 5* valve hydrant 65 Connect to exist, water line (wet tap) 66 C.l. Fittings 67 Mechanical trench compaction 68 Improved pipe foundation per 6' depth increments in place 69 Casing for 12* DIP Total Change Order Na 1 LF 50 15.60 43 670.80 LF (35)15.60 LF 410 20.85 410 8,548.50 LF 250 28.00 250 7,000.00 EA 2 340.00 2 680.00 EA (1)440.00 EA 2 795.00 2 1390.00 EA 2 1,660.00 2 3,320.00 EA 2 1,100.00 2 2,200.00 EA (1)1.440.00 LB 2,000 0.85 2,000 1,700.00 LF 670 0.20 703 140.60 LF 130 0.80 150 120.00 LF (60)118.00 $25,969.90 Total Part A - Sanitary Sewer Total Part B * Water Main Total Part C • Storm Sewer Total Part D - Street Total Addendum No. 1 Total Change Order No. 1 Total Work Compteted to Date 18,075.05 39,17530 18,81530 52303.69 531000 •>SQ(wqn $ 159349 J4 imi Rtf RP-3 W’. PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS Owner Project Project No. Flic No. Contractor City of Orono Trk 12 Frontage Road Sewer, Water & Street Improvements 91-2 13951 B & D Underground, Inc. CHANGE ORDERS Na Date 1 10-10-91 Additional work Amount $16,550.50 Total Change Orders • Add $16,55050 PAYMENT SUMMARY No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Period Start 11- I-9I 12- 1-91 lM-91 12-1-91 1-1-92 Payment $52,484.46 r»n. 189.54 38.807.87 Rclainage $2,76254 5,930.21 7,977.47 Completed $55,246.80 118,604.21 15954954 Total Payment to Date Retainage, Payment No Total Value Completed $151571.87 7,977.47 $15954954 Original Cuniract Change Orders Revised Contract $188,7864)0 16,55050 $205,33650 IJ»SI RFP RP4 i: m M Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk & Associates Otto G *ky>e«rDOi Pi ttctxrt W Itos^ne Pi Joseut. C Anot^*. PZ Mjrvrt L Scy'.'ja Pi ihcn^ns B TUner Pi Oenn R Coot PZ Thorr’^1 £ P£ Roten Q Scnuocrt PB SuVin M Ebr<»*p C PA Engineers A Architects A Gonion. PE W Poser. P£ Oonjid C PE A Boofoon Pt M*f% A Hjnion, P£ >3 K PiekS. Pi T Rjucr'jm PE tot)efT R Pfe f^ Pi D jvk ) O lOiKCU Pi rr^yrji j/ Pwenon PE C PF Jjm« f M.«ancl Pi x^nnetri P Andenon PF Mjrt V «cyfi f»£ Hooen C. •msm a i a ■nyynjJ F Angui PE a SjrAya ^F Dywi J Fdgenon. PE Mjrt A ietl Pi P^O J Cisv%<e« PE !vnie< PE Mjf» D W»»v Thomjt R A G^ry F Pyvyyjr Mun B Jerqm p£ L PPm> OnNei m Pi Rene C PkMn§ft AIA Agnei M f>ng A .'CP Jer^ D ^ttneh PE Ceuo otrver Pi Robert R DrebkyAi PE Osry W \«onrn P£ Knen L Wierne^i P£ Ktxr R yjpp PE Cnjnn a £nrtion LPO M PjVWPHlry Ma/ian M Oicn I Deti*mber 16, 1991 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Mr. John Gerhardson Re: City of Orono Lift Station No, 11 Renovation Our File No. 13959 rc r^SPi Of: J9sgX \ u / VJ'd [B u: uLa DEC 2 3 1S91 A A Dear Mr. Gerhardson: Attached is the Final Pay Request for the Lift Station No. 11 Renovation project. All work has been completed according to the project plans and specification. Attached is the IC-134 Forms from Northwest Mechanical and Pace Electric. O M Manualsw. for this project were delivered directly to Wayne Quast. We recommend the City approve this pay request which will release the 5% rctainage currently being held by the City . If you have any questions, please call. Yours very' truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERl.lK & ASSOClA'lIiS. INC. Daryl Kirschenman DK:li End. 13959.cof 2335 West Highway 36 • Si. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 • 35th Anniversary •ontitfoo ftotin# AntftrfH( A AttoclJtes « M Owner City of Orono, 1335 Brown RoaJ, Cryslal Bay, MN 55332 Dale Dee. 17, 1991 For Period November 22, 1991 to December 16, 1991 Request No. 3 A Final Conlrador Northwest Mechanical. Inc., 4.12 Mill Street Box 4Q, Long Lake, MN 553.56 REQUnST FOR PAYMENT Lift Station No. 11 Renovation File No. 13959 SUMMARY 1 Original Contract Amount 2 Change Order • Addition 3 Change Order - Deduction 4 Revised Contract Amount 5 Value Completed to Date 6 Material on Hand 7 Amount Earned 8 Less Rctainage 0% 9 Sub-Total 10 Less Amount Paid Previously 11 AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. $ $ 3 A Final Recommended for Approval by: BONESTR(K), RaSENE, ANDERLIK A ASSOCIATES, INC A Approved hv Contractor: NORTHWEST MEaiANTCAL, INC Approved by Owner: CITY OF ORONO, MN Specified Contract Completion Date: October 31, 1991 Date: IJHfRFP 48,000.00 s 48,000.00 s 48,000.00 s 0.00 $48,000.00 $0.00 s 48,000.00 $45,600.00 s 2,400.00 •» ^ llrm VnU ronffflcl Quanlllj linll PHce Qnnnfity To Dale Amount To Dale * , t h Ra<r. Riii 1 The total price for the lift station renovation to include the removal of existing equipment, piping, controls, and accessories; installation of a concrete top slab w/accesshatch; site improvements; electrical work; painting and other misc. items specified Total Work Completed to Date I^S 4fl,000.00 ■ 48.000,00- $48,000.00 IJWRfT RP I w PROJECT PA^ Owner Project Project No. File No. Contractor rSTATUS City of Orono Lift Station No. 11 Renovation 13959 Northwest Mechanical, Inc. CHANGE ORDERS No. Date I 3 Aiiiount Total Chatifte Orders - Add PAYMENT SUMMARY Na 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Period Start 10-31*91 10- 31-91 11- 22-91 11- 22-91 12- 17-91 Total Payment to Date Retainafe, Payateot Net. Total Value Completed IlfWJUT 3 St Finl Payment $30,59000 15,010.00 2,400.00 Retainage $1,610.00 2,400.00 0.00 Completed $32,200.00 48,000.00 48,000.00 $48,000(11) ODO $48,000.00 RP 2 Original Contract Change Orders Revised Contract $«,0(J0i» 0.0Q $48,OOO j QQ TO: from: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator C/fJ*'J i '<? January 9, 1992 SOBJECT: Confirmation of Date for 1992 Local Meeting Board of Review The County Assessor has suggested Orono’s Local Board of Review meeting be held on April 29 this year. The Coumcil members have indicated no current conflicts with this date. It is recommended the Council confirm the 1992 Local Board of Review meeting for 7:00 p.m. on Wednesday^ April 29. To; Prom: Date: Subject: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director Jack Brinkhaua, Public Works Supervisor January 1, 1992 Bid Award - Equipment & Materials Bids 1992 1 <?55 The City of Orono advertised for two successive weeks for street materials and equipment rental, with bid opening at 10;00 A.M. Friday, January 3, 1992. The enclosed tabulation contains a complete accounting of all bids received and the recommended low bidders and alternates. The accept'd low bids for materials are determined by availability and location of materials. Traveling distance to a supplier is considered a cost factor when determining a low bid. When renting equipment with an operator, we are guided by the type, size of equipment, and an hourly rate. It is possible to award the low bid to more than one contractor when considering materials and equipment. In order to stimulate enthusiasm for the following years work, we make sure to divide the work accordingly among these low bidders. In the event the low bidder is not available, the City reserves the right to purchase from the next alternate. Z recommend that the City Council accept the bids as presented for the calendar year 1992, Tot Mayor Peterson 6 Orono Council Members Prcm:Ron Moorse, City Administrator Forwarded recommending approval CITY OP ORONO 1992 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS « EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS—EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RA^ CLASS 5 GRAVEL TON FA-2 CLASS C (SEAL COAT) TON FA-1 (WINTER SAND) TON PIT DEI .PIT DEL.PIT DEL. Sa-Ag Ti.c.2.25*5.42 1.60*4.30 Wm Mueller & Sons 2,35 5.95 4.25*7.85*1.75 5.35 Barton Sand & Gravel Co.3.15 4.91*7.00***9.50***2.50 4.04* Midwest Asphalt Corp.**3.00 5.15 • DENOTES LOW DID *• Recrushed concrete 6 bituminous mixture ••• Modified to Barton specs CITY OF ORONO 1992 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS 6 EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS—EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURI.Y RATE -■ 2331 AC TON 2331 MC TON PLANT DELIVERED PLACED PLANT DELIVERED PLACED Commercial Asphalt 19.05 Whi Mueller 6 Sons 18.50*22.10*26.10*25.50* 29.10*34.10* Midwest Asphalt 21.30 25.25 27.25 26.50 30.50 35.50 2341 AC TON PLANT DEL.PLACED PLANT 2341 MC TON DEL. PLACED Win Mueller 6 Sons 18.50*22.10*26.10*25.50*29,10* 34.10* Midwest Asphalt Corp.21.50 25.50 27.50 27.00 31.00 36.00 Commercial Asphalt 19.50 * DENOTES LOW BID CITY OP ORONO 1992 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARB BID IN TONS—EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE MOD. FINE MIX 2341 AC TON MOD. FINE MIX 2341 MC TON 2341 AC/MC 50/50 TON PLANT DEL.PLACED PLANT DEL.PLACED PLANT DEL. PLACED ^ Mueller & Sons 19.50*23.10*27.10*26.50*30.10*35.10* Midwest Asphalt Corp.22.00 26.00 28.00 27.50 31.50 36.50 27.00*31.00* 36.00* 1 Commercial Asphalt 19.90 « DENOTES LOW BID . CITY OP ORONO 1992 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS—EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE 12"CMP 16 GAUGE 15"CMP 16 GAUGE 18"CMP 16 GAUGE 24"CMP 14 GAUGE 24"CMP 16 GAUGE 36"CMP 14 GAUGE 48"CMP 12 GAUGE 60"CMP 10 GAUGE ALL PRICES TO BE DELIVERED All Steel Products 5.25*6.25*7.90*12.00*9.50*17.00*34.00 62.00 II.V, Johnston 6.17 7.60 9.03 14.73 11.89 21.78 40.36 63.10 Contech 6.00 6.05 7.90* 12.25 10.10 19.40 32.85*60.80* 12" APRON 15" APRON 18" APRON 24" APRON 36" APRON 40" APRON 60" APRON ALL PRICES TO BE DELIVERED All Steel Products 35.00 44.00 54.00 85.00 250.00 550.00 975.00 n.V, Johnston 31.50*39.60*51.30*76.50*225.00*541.80*951.30* Contech 32.75 41.50 53.90 80.25 237.05 549.50 979.50' I * DENOTES LOW BID CITY OF ORONO 1992 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS t EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS—EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE 12"15"18"24"36"48"60" BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND ALL PRICES TO BE DELIVERED All Steel Products 5.25*6.25*7.90*12.00 25.00 68.00 93.00 U.V, Johnston 6.17 7.60 9.03 11.89 21.78 60.54 94.65 CITY OP ORONO 1992 BID TABUIJVTIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS fc EQOIPHENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS—EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE I TRUCK PER HOUR CY RATE TRUCK PER HOUR CY RATE TRUCK PER HOUR CY RATE TRUCK PER HOUR CY RATE Don Arens 11 45.00* Schoenlng Excavating 12 36.00* Volkenant 6 Sons 12 42.00 Hayes Excavating 10 37.50*13 42.50* TRUCK TRUCK TRUCK TRUCK PER HOUR PER HOUR PER HOUR PER HOUR CY RATE CY RATE CY RATE CY RATE MBE Inc,14 42.00*18 52.00*22 54.00* Don Arens 17 50.00* Volkenant i Sons 18 52.00* 1:* DENOTES LOW DID CITY OP ORONO 1992 BID TABUIATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS t EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARB BID IN TONS—EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE BACKHOE DACKHOF.BACKHOE PER HOUR PER HOUR PER HOUR CY RATE CY RATE CY RATE Schoenlng Excavating 1/2 48.00*3/4 60.00* Volkonant & Sons 1/3 50.00*3/4 75.00 3/4 TON PICKUP W/8 PLOW PER HOUR Schoenlng Excavating 34.00* • DENOTES LOW BID 1 ALTERNATE 8 «in 1 1 CITY OP ORONO 1992 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS t EOUIPMEMT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARK BID IN TONS —EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE WHEEL LOADER PER HOUR CY RATE WHEEL LOADER PER HOUR CY RATE WHEEL LOADER PER HOUR CY RATE TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Coun_’il Ron Moorse, City Administrator January 9, 1992 SUBJECT: Receipt of the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Repottinq - 1990 Financial Report Attachment:A. Notification Letter From Government Finance Officers Association Dated 12/23/91; Sample News Release; Award of Financial Reporting Achievement The City of Orono has been awarded the G.F.O.A.'s Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Repotting for the comprehensive annual financial report for the year ended December 31, 1990. This is the fourth consecutive year the City has earned the certificate. The Certificate of Achievement is the highest form of recognition in governmental accounting and financial reporting, and its attainment represents a significant accomplishment by a government and its management. Congratulations to Finance Director Tom Kuehn, and to his staff for their ongoing efforts, and to the audit staff of Malloy, Karnowski and Co. for their valuable assistance, and to the City Council for the leadership in supporting and encouraging the City to seek this award. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by that the Council congratulate Finance Director Tom Kuehn and the financial staff for the City's obtaining the G.F.O.A. Certificate ot Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reportinq for the 1990 Comprehensive Annual Finance Report; and acknowledges the valuable assistance provided by the audit staff of Malloy, Karnowski and Co. Ayes , Nays r GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 1BQ North MichjQsn Avenu6, ouiie 8C0 ChicaQO. Mlinois 606C » 312'977-97Q0 • Fa* 312/977-40CB December 23, 1991 A The Honorable Barbara A. Peterson Mayor City of Orono p.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Mayor Peterson; We are oleased to notify you that your comprehensive annual finan and its attainment represents a significant accomplishment by a government and its management. When a Certificate of Achievement is awarded to a government, an Award of Financial Reporting Achievement is also , individual designated by the government as primarily . for its having earned the certificate. Enclosed is ai. Award of Financial Reporting Achievement for: Thomas M. Kuehn, Finance Director. The Certificate of Achievement plaque will be shipped under sepa­ rate cover L about eight weeks. We hope that you will arrange for a forLl presentation of the Certificate and Award of Financial Reporting Achievement, and that appropriate publicity will P® aiven to this notable achievement. To assist with this, news release and the 1990 Certificate Program results are enclosed. We hope that your example will encourage other government offi­ cials in their efforts to achieve and maintain an appropriate standard of excellence in financial reporting. Sincerely, GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Frederick G. Lantz ^ ^ „ Assistant Director/Technical services Center FGL/kas Enclosures WASHINGTON Of F'CI 17K) K Str^. N 20)gn?/466-27*V0 • f»* 202/429-2755 niife c Bcsr. GOVERrj.MErJT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 1BO Nctn Michigan Avenue Suite 8C0, Chicago Illinois 6C601 312/977-97CO • Fa* 312/977-4806 December 23, 1991 NEWS RELEASE For information contact: Fred Lantz (312) 977-9700 (Chicago)--The Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Finan cial Reporting has beer awarded to: CITY OF ORONO by the Government F: lance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) for .cs comprehensive annual financial report (CAFR). The Certificate of Achievement is the highest form of recognition in the area of governmental accounting and finan­ cial reporting, and its attainment represents a significant accomplishment by a government and its management. An Award of Financial Reporting Achievement has been awarded to the individual designated as primarily responsible for preparing the award-winning CAFR. This has been presented to: THOMAS M. KUEHN, FINANCE DIRECTOR The CAFR has been judged by an impartial panel to meet the high standards of the program including demonstrating a construe tive "spirit of full disclosure" to clearly communicate its financial story and motivate potential users and user groups to read the CAFR. The GFOA is a nonprofit professional association serving 12,300 government finance professionals with offices in Chicago, Illinois, and Washington, D.C. - 30 - WASWeiiGTON OFFiCf mom The Governnunt Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada f n'u nti ill is AWARD OF FINANCIAL REPORTING ACHIEVEMENT lo: Thomas M. Kuehn Finance Director City of Orono, Minnesota The Awaf J of Financial Reporting Achievement is presented by the Government Finance Officers to those individuals who have been instrumental in their goxfemment unit achieving a Certificate of Achievement for Euellence in Financial Reporting. A Certificate of Achiei^ement is piesented to those goi*emrnent units whose annual financial reports are fudged to adhere lo program standards and represents the highest aUHmf in goiteniment ftnanciai reporting. Fiea^we Director [kite December 23, 1991 k To: From: Date: Subject: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director January 9, 1992 -nI i0^ / ^ / ( Ron Moorse, City Administrator RECYCLING CONTRACT 1992 In November 1991 bids were received and opened f providing curbside recycling services for 1992. The bids received were as follows: Polka Dot Recycling BFI $48,600 $84,888 Prior to awarding the bid to Polka Dot, we were advised that Polka Dot had gone out of business and on December 16, 1991 both bids were re‘*.ected by Council. On December 17, 1991 the West Henepin Recycling Commission Biet and negotiated an amount with E-Z Recycling of St. Paul to complete our 1991 curbside program and enter into an agreement for 1992. E-Z has proposed $5265 per month or $S3,1BC annually which •IS $1215 per month higher than Polka Dot but $1809 per month lower than BFI. E-2 Recyclers costs are tied to service costs and current ard future market value of the products they pick up at curbside. RecoflUDendation: To direct staff to enter into an agreement with E-Z Recyclers of St. Paul to provide curbside recycling service to the City of Orono for ar annual cost of $63,180 for 1992. Proposed Motion Moved 2nd to direct staff to enter into an agreement with E-Z Recyclers of St. Paul to provide curbside recycling service to the City of Orono for an annual cost of $63,180 for 1992. Isv l.'i P i I I ! TO:Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM Dorothy Hallin, City Clerk Opf. DATE January 3, 1992 % % SUBJECT: Tax Forefited Land Attachments:A. Department of Property Tax and Public Records Letter Dated 12/12/91 B. Map Identifying Properties C. Jeanne A. Mabusth Memo Dated 12/30/91 D. Stephen Weckman Memo Dated 1/2/92 E. Proposed Resolution Tax Forfeited Land Released For Private Sale to Adjacent Owners The tax forfeited lands have been reviewed by staff. As noted in Attachment C, it is staff's recommendation these properties be released for sale to adjacent property owners only. Attachment E is a proposed resolution for Council adoption. 7^ HENNEPIN DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAX AND PUBLIC RECORDS A607 Government Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487-0067 Crossroads To Service /TCjr? 1;7t]L ; i Ls ij. j ^7^ ijjj E>ecenibec 12, 1991 Dorothy M. Hallin, Clerk City of Orono P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 'DEC 1 e 1991 Dear Ms. Hallin: Enclosed is a classification list on non-conservation land located in your municipality. The described parcels forfeited to the state of Minnesota ^or non-payment of property taxes. As provided in Minnesota Statuces 282, we request that you either approve the parcel(s) for public auction, auction to adjacent owners if Minnesota Statutes 202.01, Subdivision 7A is applicable, or request a conveyance to your municipality for public use. Our department recommends that your governmental suWivision target February 14, 1992, for returning resolutions apprc/ing parcels for public auction in order that those parcels may be included in a spring 1992 public auction. Please be advised that if the city council fails to respond wimin ninety (90) days of the date of this letter, the sale will be deemed to be approved. We request that your city council or governing body adopt language in its resolution recommending disposition of the aforementioned tax forfeited land parcels whereby the non-conservation classification status pursuant to M.S. 282.01 of the lands is affirmed. In addition, we request that your resolution certifies that none of the parcels recommended for public auction or non-public adjacent owner auction need be withheld from sale pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 85.012 (lands located within the boundaries of J state park), 92.461 (land containing substantial deposits of peat), 28.t.01, Subd. 0 (deposits of minerals), 282.018, Subd. 1 (waterfront land on meandered lakes, public waters and watercourses), or 282.018, Subd. 2 (non-fcrested marginal land or wetlands). We require a certified copy of the City Council Resolution authorizing action taken. If you request that a parcel be conveyed to your municipality, we also require that the form "Application by a Governmental Si^ivision f’of Conveyance of Tax Forfeited Land" be completed and mailed to this office. y n0w special assessments which were levied after the forfeiture need ^ certified to this department. The remaining bala.ice of any assessment levied previously will be picked up automatically. HENNEPIN COUNTY on equal opportunity employer k. Dorothy M. Hallin, Clerk December 12, 1991 page 2 We request the assistemce of your governmental subdivision in making a determination as to the existence of any wells on the tax forfeited land listed on the aforementioned list. If any of the parcels on the list have wells, please complete and return a Well Disclosure Certificate which will be required for state deed recordation pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 1031.235 (see enclosure). In addition, please provide any pertinent information that may be available about the parcels on the non-conservation classification list, such as zoning, soil conditions, or municipal restrictions. If you have any questions, you may contact Gordy Ramm, Jeff Strand or Terry Schuhler, of the Tax Forfeited Land Unit, at 340-3734 or 348-7309. Sincerely, Patrick H. O'Connor, Director Property Tax emd Public Records M. J.'^erry Tax Processing Section Supervisor PHO:MJB:sw Enclosure ij. CF Lv^oc<y Avaco) CITYCF SPRING. crTr of ’o^jo •►a ^64 • • • • ^ "" - . ** v»/Ji 1 -r•’••I-#* • 9^^ • « . ▼ -----------------—I ------------* “"rd6’"''“ I •••Kffl*A9'-5Ql£_. - -X ^ k 17S iA.5A m ^pL 1 HAL cm r\ « ^ f L‘ (30) " ^ f (<7) ' - \iy\ nOL L ^ 2 V (<811: H I AC OP f 3 AC 134 s.uT^ECx ^ ’ P rop ^'^tn f«T or LOT 9 *-. -- •• ■• • -- •‘-•"T' .J, ____ —•• J2).B _. ^ J9^ - '-2^‘ A 9 I'/^r-rV"*- p j ,K>04r-jija# * ‘r^lLSr^ ^• .^riAtr ; / 14) » - ^ m * >... ,# -.i-i^i.^-y 'r^..:'“-r ■. A - . — r*5oT6 r*fgiri 1ko'£1 S«: ' a :*' »A iivi^ ?!? ’*«} o;S? -.7"; t2S* Q y-> ‘-'e • ^ ^ % C ^«o " 5- 7aSG f-;,-8 ^2iC'23W3^ f s7= s 5? ■ ■; /..I X>..............-..r-rsr^n I i ft; L •, V-, TO: FROM: DATE: Dorothy Hallin, City Clerk Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator December 30, 1991 P.I.D. 17-117-23 34 0015 Approximate area = 552 square feet (12' x 46') Required area = 21,780 square feet Property not located within a designated wetland RECOMMENDATION - Release onj^^ for sale to adjacent property owners. P.I.D. 17-117-23 43 0073 Approximate area = 6,700 square feet (50' x 134') Required area = 2.1,780 square feet Property not located within a designated wetland RECOMMENDATION - Release only for sale to adjacent property owners. TO: FROJ4; DATE: RE: Dorothy Hallin, City Clerk Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager January 2, 1992 Well Information on Tax Forfeit Lands Two properties with PID numbers 17-117-23 43 0073 and 17-117-23 34 0015 have gone tax forfeit. According to our records no permits have been issued for well installation on either property. Also, neither . roperty is suitable for a principal dwelling, so it is unlikely that any unsealed wells exist on these properties. TAX FORFEITKD LAND RELEASED FOR PRIVATE SALE TO ADJACENT OWNERS WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 282, the City has received from Hennepin County a list of lands within the City which have become the property of the State of Minnesota for non­ payment of real estate taxes; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said lands for compliance with local zoning ordinances, for the amount of outstanding special assessments remaining unpaid to the City, and/or for possible public use by the City as authorized by the Statutes. In addition the Council has reviewed said lands and certifies that these parcels need not be withheld from sale pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 85.021, 92,461, 282.01, Subd. 8, 282.018, Subd. 1, or 282.01;8, Subd 2. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 282, hereby approves the classification of each of the following parcels of land as non-conservation land, and furthermore, approves the public sale of each parcel of land as listed below to adjacent property owners. All parcels remain subject to all applicable zoning ordinance provisions, including those regulations providing for minimum lot area and minimum lot width. Substandard parcels may be useable only in combination with other adjoining parcel(s). Release of these lands by the City Council is subject to the condition that all outstanding special assessments shall be paid in full to the City upon return to private ownership. Any amount not recovered at the time of sale shall be subject to reassessment by the City. PARCELS RELEASED FOR SALE District P.I.D. 38 17-1 17-23 34 001 5 Release to 1 7-1 1 7-23 34 001 6, 17-117-23 34 0018 or 17-117-23 31 0035 only. 38 17-1 1 7-23 43 0073 Release to 17-1 1 7-23 43 0074, 17-117-23 43 0072 or 17-117-23 43 0070 only. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a reqular meeting held the 13th day of January, 1992. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M, Hallin, City Clerk L r TO:Mayor and City Council FROM:Fun Moorse, City Administrator I % 'V 'V, DATE:December 32, 1991 SUBJECT; Job Evaluation Study Update r o , When the Pay Equity (Comparable Worth) law was passed in 1 984 it required all cities to conduct a job evaluation study to determine an internal ranking of positions as the basis of a compensation plan. Orono participated with approximately 150 other cities in a joint study conducted by Control Data using the FOCUS job evaluation system. This study was completed in 1986. In recent years as jobs have changed in response to new technology the need to update the FOCUS system has increased. In addition, as cities have used the system over the years a number of deficiencies have been identified. In response to requests from cities the Metropolitan Area Managers Association (MAMA) is moving ahead with an update of the FOCUS system and a concurrent study of 40 benchmark positions using the HAY system. This dual project will provide an update to the FOCUS system while also providing a second job evaluation system as an alternative to the FOCUS system and as a check on the FOCUS system. The cost of the project is being assessed to participatino cities on the basis of a base charge of $1,000 plus $15.00 per employee. The total cost to Orono is $1,600. It is recommended that the Council approve Orono's participation in the project an' authorize the payment of the $1,600 assessment amount. I 4 J TO; FROM; DATK: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator January 9, 1992 V SUBJECT; Work Session to Discuss 1992 Goals and Work Plan To provide a framework and guide for staff and Council efforts in 1992, it is important to develop a set of goals and a work plan for the year. It is recommended that a work session be scheduled in the near future to develop the 1992 goals and work plan. m 11092.2 I I TO: FROM: DATE: Ron Moorse, City Administrator Tom Kuehn, Finance Director % January 10, 1992 SUBJECT: 1992 Insurance Award - Worker Compensation %% > We have received the renewal premium quotation for worker compensation insurance from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) for the year 1992. The gross premium quote for 1992 is $73,238, which is reduced by our now favorable experience modification of .70 and a premium discount of 6%, resulting in a net initial premium of $46,872. This compares with our net initial premium for 1991 of $58,776 and for 1990 of $60,959. The worker compensation insu'ance budget for 1992 is $70,460, therefore the net initial premium is $26,366 under budget. It is recommended that the 1992 worker compe.'»sation insurance be renewed with the LMCIT for $46,872. The other insurances should be ready for Council approval at the next Council meeting. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by to award the City of Orono 1992 worker compensation insurance to the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust effective January 1, 1992. Ayes , in the amount of $46,872, Nays TO: FROM: DATE: Ron Moorse, City Administrator Tom Kuehn, Finance Director ‘ 9 January 10, 1992 SUBJECT: 1992 Police Vehicle Acquisition The City participates in the Hennepin County purchasing contract for squad cars. The County has awarded the contract for 1992 to Superior Ford. The County has established January 31, 1992 as the cut off date for purchase orders. The City has budgeted for replacement of three squads in 1992. The contract costs per vehicle are $1 2,752 or a total of $38,256. The City has budoeted $37,200 in 1992, however this figure includes the credit from the sale of three squads and the change over costs. The City should receive about $9,000 for the sale of the three squads to be replaced so there should be ample funds in the budget. It is recommended that Council authorize the purchase of three Ford Crown Victorias from Superior Ford at a cost of $38,256 as the quantity and costs are within the 1992 budget amounts. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by to approve the purchase of the three squad cars as budgeted, with the bid award under Hennepin County Contract 2038A1R-232 to Superior Ford for the 1992 Ford Crown Victoria at a total purchase price of $38,256. The 1992 budget amount of $37,200 includes the estimated credit of $9,000 for the sale of three squads and the change-over costs. Ayes , Nays % / ^ /LIST 0? LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL^ '/I FOR MEETING OP January 13, 1991 Conunercial Kennel License - D. Brian/Cathy L. Fulmer The Dog House Boarding Kennels, Inc. 3505 Wayzata Blvd C/, %o ' Residential Kennel License - W. Hoyer & H. Zohara 565 Hanlon Ave i.D. Brian/Cathy L. Fulmer 3505 Wayzata Blvd Thomas/Ingrid Anderson 3550 North Shore Drive Nancy Ritchie 1075 Tonkawa Road Frank & Sue Kokesh 4100 Watertown Road One Day Liquor License and One Day On Sale Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquors - Spring Hill Center pomplex 725 Sixth Avenue North February 22, 1992 * KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Effective January 1, Dererrre r 31. 19^1^ Owner:T:)> c>rnvs u. \ ^“°!nclude ‘^citr^=^ Mailing Address (if different)------------------------------------- ..4-^ v:>,7c'sPhone: ^ViomP») -------------------—• RESIDENTIAL Kennel License 525.00 (payment must accompany application) rrrv nc w. I ) wt r.FFJCE s/c Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time: (over 3 months of age) Principal Breed; Purpose for more t.han 2 dogs;----- Dogs normally kept; _____inside Kennel License Inforaation: 5150.CO (payment must accompany application) nonwn i/MwitU cr^iM»ru rji I AMnifU^ Ul I j 71 7^‘rinnM 01 CEii 150.00 R 150.00 heceift -ihane you f 2303^0 cool ROl T14:2 12/09/9 rucrk'Ui/i.un kennel structure j ‘*T.; <r T'Vv' J-W*l IrCK»Cw<^Name of --------------^ T. KA - C» - <* ^~~P^ ^ * A ^V-^A ^*Cgt?rV^Normal Business Hours: H - - 'Po.uvsCC-. After Hours Contact: (n^e oog r-ins/exercise areas are: --------inside -------outside ^bot.b The undersigned hereby makes l°n Council for a Kennel i.-cense is permissive only undersigned violate any provision of any and does not grant any , *,-on- the undersigend hereby City ordinance or other f the premises prior to grants the City permisssion ^ reasonable time during the license approval ‘'"T.Her“gn^ agrees to abide by ^he license duration? and 5,36^ including any special requir^ents o£ City Vounci 1 as part of any kennel conditions imposed by the uiuy license approval- Applicant ___ 4 TXO Date riM^a I 7--I 5Y- 9/__ Recommends Approval^^^X---- Denial 31, 19_2i Effective Owner: Prooerty Addressi —_ (include city ana zip Mailing Address (if different): Phone: (home), o/ld, {work ) ^ t « rBSIDBBTIAL Kennel License (payment must accompanyfSL j ***%-•- » ■— ^ Maximum Bo. of dogs to be )cept at one time:Ji (over 3 months of age; /U . cl,Principal Breed: ^ _ purpose for more than 2 dogs:_fo. Dogs normally kepr; _^^j;:l.inside I I ^ p I y-f'df^ C /'f" kennel struc-ure □mmERCIAL Kennel License ^^yment must accompany applicat- Name of Business: ClTi OF O&i^ £.i?^AxCE OFFICE j Vi Vt;V»/l,VA i Ji Jk/vv'v^/v ’■’♦ ~fcH '-.r m W•ite* •"'C-cw* • OvBusiness Activities#^—- tr^-rcare# re-aii~r _(ex^ole: boarding, breec-ng, vete—-a-/ c Atvrrpr.7;,,». .Bi. n22yS 70 coo: Ron^. He-mal Business Hours ---------------------------------------- “« *- -'.'■i"» /V After Hours Contact: (n^e>. Dog zrins/exercise areas are: inside ____outside -----^boch Dog rtin5/ee;kcei.w-s-w------------ ------------- The undersigned hereby mahes ^PPl^-tion^ to the.^Orono^ rjy rfluncil for a Kennel License as sp permissive cn^-y Undersigned acknowledges Violate any provision of a^ny and does not grant any *^^^°^V^^.milat-'on; the undersigend hereby “ty ordinance or other law °P premises prior touity w* «siT-nisaaion to inspecw theCity ordinance or otner x*»w the premises prior to erlnts the City permiss.ion time during the license »PP”:«\ \\rijersigned agrees!r=.n..^rpproyal -^/,\-„^Jers%n%d%grees to abide by the license duration; and the 5 36 including any special “c^T/ements of Municipal Code ,, any kennel conditions imposed by ^he ciry license approval. Applicant Knnen.-iapec°2a^by J)^---t^C/VtieO. Recommends Approval,^- Denial- - - Date ' Date 9/ ^ KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Effective January Decembe- r - Owner t U. t=l:tv1 " T ------------------------------- ^ \ __% C2-M V-CrX:^ L.*VVL^_N^l:^----P-ooerty ' ^rrPr —-------------' < “(include city anozlpi 1 Mailing Address (if different): me: ^Hnme) ^'~\('.-,S'?dZJ^---------- f-^nrk) ^tV^-^OZ-Co,CJTf OF OROr^O WdeWTIAL Kennel License Inforaation: S25.00 (payment must accompany application) ____________<-p f rr! #" f^wil Ui t iuu i lyfi ww rucrk' Ce« /i.l^M yi 6£V nr fcefc/ • w Tlf L.00 layment must au-uuuiy«aaj RElEIPT-THARK YOU ^ time' COOl ROl TU^lMaximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time. 3 months of age)(over 3 months of age) Principal ---------------------------------- purpose for more than 2 dogs - - - - --- - --- - - - - -- ,1 ■ 7 ins’de J kennel structure^Dogs normally kept: _ _v_ms. ae —w— COMMEHCIM. Kennel License Inforaation: S150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business: Business Activities :_^------careT retail^ ezc,)(e.xample: boarding, breeci.ng, vete--..a./ Normal Business Hours: After Hours Contact: (name)(phone) Dog runs/exercise areas are:inside outside both uog iuiis/w..-------------- £uSSe Ts BHS^;2S indersigned ^UQ-^tv to violate any provision of any ind does not grant any authori n; the undersigend hereby :ity ordinance or other tL premises prior to License approval °.“®f--ed agrees to abide by the License duration? and 5 26 including any special requirements o£ CitfSuncii'.s part of any kennel•onditions imposed by the city License approval. pplicasit _ Date orCity__Ose_Only ennel inspected by IJ-/7 - ‘f/ eoonmiends Approval_Ji— Denial r>/AO/a u./ V / / r«r«i*i 41 I»m5^ sm%] wiling Miil«|si Tzr [•ftmiMfw kennel license application Mailing Address (if different): Phone: (home),'A'l \ (work) '----- - —----------- - «. Tif'ense Information: $25.00 appiioation, Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time: (over 3 months or age) 3 principal Breed ( ^ V V r\ L I v.N_^Y\!: JU cr purpose for more than 2 dogs:. V inside_____^kennel structure CITY OF Cfi'JfiO c y Ai \ *ir c nC’c j rI j.nnn\,u xji < x t. 4. Ij IJzOOOOO 01 CEH 7L EIPT-imK YOU rue " V' U f > L. u-l % r-C /V) ■■ 00 iiuiuii • .......................... ^ iVwlJ Oni Tf 7;rruU7/U\/ i\\fA i a *J • j m / - • 009*3 normally i n / Ate/ . tm 1 T-cense Information: $150.00mMERCIAL Kennel L-Cense xi i,---f-icn) ^yment must accompany applxcatxon) Name of Business: Business Activities: veLert.-.ary oa.e, retaU, (example: boarding, or- -.ng. Normal Business Hours: After Hours Contact: (n^e)^ Dog runs/exercise areas are: inside ____outside -----both ie undersigned hereby. makes on thls°fo^^ ?der%\gni"acknwiedges‘'\hr^^^ ' If " any J?/||lilllcrrr^SL*rror;Ulation:^^^^^^^ onditions imposed by -ne icons* approval. plicant IkDare CU X • r City Pee Only ^ nn«i inspected by —UCu Date commends Approval, uCL denial Cwne kennel license application ^ 1, 19^0 _DeceriDer 3i, ri ij /v\V ^L-. -■ ^^VtTv;~^ Is ~r\ ’ A t 7 rx^nfr*/^ .-=oer--y , T n ^ §i (include city ana 21?i Mailing Address (if different) Phone: (hni-ip) ‘4-~7(g A —. ^ _ (work) RBSIDBNTIAL Kennel License (payment must accompany .. ^ / Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time:_i2l (over 3 months of age) Principal Breed :__y2ClAl-2=^O ipvJNO.Y A O Purpose for more t.han 2 dogs:_ y \\ Dogs normally kept: ^inside --------ke.nnel structure COMMERCIAL Kennel License t S150.00 (payment must accompany application) ■-------------------------- " Name of Busmes>s:— ————— ~ Business Activities:.^----- -. ——vp.-e'-r.ary care, retaii. jr (exancle: boarding, nreecrng, ve-e..r rjik-i ifHCE I TlJ * 7 J,A\y\/\/V 01 CEH CASH. ’’ Normal Business Hours: After Hours Contact: -jr ,Vi Aik/* w (phone ___________ Dog r^uns/exercise areas ares i..Sa.de outside___^both i ■ • /7/» /O ’ The undersigned hereby na.ee aPP^/.^ion^ ” '^*,Torn: ^tSe^ Council for a Kennel kenn-^i license is permissive only undersigned acknowledges Viol ate any provision of any »;d does not grant “V aatoority to undersigend hereby City ordinance or other law VV„«nec- the premises prior to prints the =1^^ P«™/V/\ry otherTea's^^^^^^ th^license approval *nd at any o-n jgr.es to abide by the license duration; and the undersign v including any special conditions imposed by the city license approval. l / //*< /^ I r2nnel*Insp«tS'a^by JL^ (va taa lecomraends Approval_i::H Denial • • Interoffice Memo Date: To: From: Re: December 26, 1991 Ron Moorae, City Administrator Steve Sullivan, Chief of Police One Day Liquor License 1 have reviewed the application for the one day liquor license at the Spring Hill Conference Center. I have no objections and recommend issuance of this permit. Tamarack Investments, Inc. • • «. • ■i i r * • » • December 13, 1991 iliL ‘ City of Orono P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 1. 6 1.99^ ATTENTION:Ms. Dorothy M. Hall In City Clerk RE:SPRING HILL CENTER COMPLEX 724 County Road 6 Orono, MN 55391 Dear Dorothy: As require, I am enclosing the following documentation in support of my request for a one-day permit for the purpose of serving beer and wine at the Spring Hill Center Complex on February 22, 1902: Form PS 9007 - Application for Corsumption and Display (Set-up) Permit Form 235 - Application for Retail License to Sell Non-intoxicatino Malt Liquor On Premises Form SP:C1 - State of Minnesota, License Applicant Information Form - Proof of Worker’s Compensation Insurance Coverage Form - Data Privacy Advisory Fee - Check H0001793 in the amount of $ 50.00 • •• 4 %It Is understood between the Owner and the City of Orono that we would have multiple exempt tenants at Spring Hill. The users and beneficiaries of such licenses as currently being applied for are the Freshwater Foundation and the Woodridge Church. • ** Therefore, it was previously agreed upon with the City of Orono, that the desirable course of conduct would be to have*, one responsible party, that being the Spring Hill Land % • • * a ' ' * ^ * . * • Company.• « *'e 445 East Lake Street • MN • Phone <6l2i • FAX (612) 473-0152 j ri- r y..- %..* • * ^ -V . •. I »• .; V r .• (• *'* * - • • 4 'I 4 ^ •'A •% *•t^. •• 4 « City of Orono ATTN: Ms. Dorothy M. Hall in RE: SPRING HILL CENTER COMPLEX December 13, 1991 Page 2 of 2 Please advise if there are questions concerning the above the enclosed documentation. Very truly yours, COMPANY • j^y Pampuc GeiWral Manager Agent for the Owner, Duncan N. Dayton enclosures i K * 4 . • • f •. ♦ • a » • • ♦ .. j •<. *: ' •t.*** *• • « i. • - H 4 J ^ • - » A. • • . • *• ;• ‘ * ' • .4 , - ; »*. ?• > ■ 4aAMftllWtlfMMkrU« ‘M M ..i • / f • 1 I * •' » f ( i . • • PHONE et]>206 6IS9 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PURLIC SAFFTN LIQUOR CONTROL DIVISION EVENT: Con!o?2hce 333 SIBLEY • ST PAUL. MN 65101 DATE: 02/22/92 TIME: 8:00 AM - APPLICATION FOR CONSUMPTION AND Dl'.PLAY (SET UP) PERMIT ONE DAY PERMIT FF6 .< $25.00 ir NAM{ »NO *00«IS1 Sh OAN arc NOT CORt^ECT MAKE CMANGH IN SPACES Bf LOW NOTE:ALLCLUB*ON-SALEMNTOXiCATINGL Ol JRlIcrN-: E*SAR “ -XEMPTFROMAPPLYING. Center,Comp lexSpring Hill Land Co. Ltd. Partnership] 725 Coint Orono, MN Buimtit Siftti Ai:o««ti o« Boa Numft*. - jimv 145 East Lake Street, Ste #220 iJennepin Cilv Wayzata BtMUfT TVPI riDf^Naia C»w ' Oau IpMc Bu«*'*tii Of Bw»in««| •« Clwft B. J. Pampuch Slat* MN Buim«44 ''r ^ij • ▼ lAatiaMfaet i Conference Center/Retreat Center N«m« oi Omf*9t Duncan N. Dayton xffr‘Tnr7rtxTTTirfUTrnfTTTBTTrrTrrrr^innrTT~nr7!n!rirT7 (>*MI « iviflNtSS tit ABUJ mmINT f tr-, KJ^ai Qpao »S AA**l»CA»iC)N — — 0«»0 Al. -jicjc •fPafiMBLni TflAPi^Pf O n if TAAN&f ‘145 K. Lakf? St., Ste «^220. Wayzata. MN 55 AtfO'ttt o' 0«f««f 445 K. Lake St., Ste ^220, Wayzata, MN 65 6rf 4 ^4 iN iNT^iaidATIsb mal V i.<ql ol Lict^lt ISIUI6 ^91 B91 TO TMlt BUftiNtSt *'OA THIS LOCATIONT Une^Dav Permit 14 ^ A uiciNstii n Amc And r ^»7tTlTT¥XOT7JZSr? Pn . >uncan N. Davton ^OR A PUBLIC BUSINESS M a l*aM>>t»ihto, Si«it i><f U§nst t*vj A<i.j>»n o» {»rh it § C.o»po»»tHjw. «»'t N»mt »n(j Arld'fftt ol €K^ Oi*ict» DuncanBuIm#JTl*5»l Judson M. Davton Addftit 415 E. Lake St., Ste *220, Wayzata. MS5$91 012; So.. 8t1i St . Ste *8<3U. Mpls, MN 55 Uat# \,*m% •» T>.*^9 Clufc Al PtaMMf i.«*< •!>•«« fOR A /RIVATI CLUB Nwm(,«r 9* Waf^i A>nou^f 0» f •«« l| C'w* 0«rr>«# o« MaMlttf* P^v*§ l!7Uica«/'litatiM C»<*B N§m# 0«>«l C’uo M«.•«(•«•« Lot.a««i P •»* To SlO## L'OmW*n □ n . Aootaat A4I4*« • Hi! applicant, if pafintrthip, any partntr, if corporation, any jfficer or director; if club any ciub officer O' d.rec*or. ever bad a iicente unde* the Minnesota Liruor Controi Act revoked or suspended or been convicted for any violation of State Laws or local ordinancts. if so. give dale snd details _______________ I HOf 00V ct*t>lv »»»•» I**# •»# *»v# 0* *^0 mmtrt kn0^o4o« • ^ »1 •*''1 * ‘ '*»• *0 f'*V O0< <nl0«m0,t0n C0^»«wl0« (0WM >#( of H».« 0O«m.| ANT ff RMtT »5SUf n Mf A| :.^NOf » UOIS NOT Al IQW TM| SAi.I 0^ iSTO« iCAT INO LIQUOR NO CONSIOIWATION will 8C GIVIN TO THIS AePtlCATIQN uNuss A^novfo AS Fwovioeo snow IHI BUSINiSStSlOCATtDINACOUNTV •••*«••< - C«kOI»0O»»0O COo««V §••«« or 4oo.*««n|«i..« Ullf 1^ TMf tUSlNISS IS LOCATfO IN A MUNlCI^UTV A#4i'*raf%i 12/13 91 - Ot,,Aw«P«o« <f».| Ao.il.f tni bti t (lerCd Mgr., Agent for Owner, Duncar. .w. It A CLUB ArtACH A CORV 0$ ?M| CONSTI^AA O B .Ai^ Of THf CLUB AND A CURBfNT U$T 0^ MEMBERS C b0WI<« e»t*>et>t 0* *to0nnntft!yt ^S W (’AH CASH CHECK « N # . «• • >••.-.'I ; « •* f • i . #' I i f • f . ^ * s • .. •: • . t •- * .!< .'/vi • i • --it.’ ^ • •• •* •*. > f % ■ • t • I.» n ; -N • • f • • « ♦ « #•» I I • 4 r i • •. t • • ■ ‘ #• I • • I • • ! !• •• • t t ’ ' (, i# ?- r . f I'"* • • I I ! ••• ^ «_ • ► ^ A** ft'i ** •» Fbrm No. 235-AMikiilu* for Rriin I icruftr lo Ml • • Nofi'iaiotktliffg MiM I Iq«o# **flN'* rrrr«ii«<^. iH.. ii r»t ONE DAY $25.00 RETAIL “ON SALE” ^tate oC itlimiC£(ota coo.vTr or . ..hennepin To the........ .KSM EVENT:ALL DAY CONFERENCE DATE:02/22/92 TIME: 8:00 AM - Uldiilght ___ or MINNESOTA_______ of the .............of....9^^a.9.................. 1.1 STATE State of Minnesota: }itrtibi/ apply.__far a UeertM far (h» Urm af .....9^.?S.^.^y — from .........22.nd..........................of .................FebruarX...., ;p ?.? to ttii At Retail Onij, Non-Intuxicatin; Malt Llqaors, CM tK$ lamp art dt/fned by taw, far cantumptUm "O.Y” (hott earlain prtmiut in tha Township ----------p;j Orono dttpriied Of fMmn, Spring H,1 l L..Center....... 725 County Road 6 Orono, MN 553U1 ol whioh plopp $c.ld applvoani operaU^ ihs biuine$s of ....4 Con Fence/Re and to ihai tnd rtpreoent...and itats . as folUnv§: Thai paid applicant .......i_______________MU^.....af ths UniUd Statos; of good moral oharacUr and rtpuio; and ha.......aU4iiP^^ tho ago of Ml ytart; . —.............proprietor....—/>/ ths esiablUhmerl for which ths license will bs issued if this appiioaiion i$ granted, Ttiai no manufacturer of such non^inioxicating mall liquors has any ownership, In whols or iss P<^ri, in said business of said applicant or any interest therein; Thai said applicant maJesd this application pursuant and subject to all the laws m .mcA~—n ^v.COMinnesota and ths ordinances and regulations of said.........---------------------------- applieabis ihsrUo, which are hereby mads a part hereof, and hereby agree to observe and ] *4 7 -------------------1----------- I ■ t « >>> 1»» ■ I »»*•«■ •* •#»•«••• ••>•••* C8«^ M*t* fSh»9 rvqaaroMaaU. If «•#. «f laMJ rn«!aU««a| Each applicant further states that by the commencement of business and by July I of each succeeding year said applicant wUI ha\‘t paid the federal Special Occupattonal Tom to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms for a mail dealer. ___December 13._______ jpJ B. Pam;juch, General Manager and Agent for Owner, Duncan N. Dayton F, 0, Jddrese ----------------- --------------^----------_____ 445 East Lake Street, Suite #220 aa^XALS.,,. MN 55JLiil_______________ /» * * «» • ••!■ { f** • -t. I t • t I ■! '.i : t i ( • A ; 5 • • V !;■ vj- yf '•3 T ^ .t; , V t f ■|: : f- ■) b h r 4 . ■ t-'. t% ; >■*! uj i'": 01/05/92 PR; CB PRREQOR EMP • NAME DPT 471688060 474563339 471840871 475443862 472503991 469526026 475989721 468821018 472529007 468701868 507585424 469686562 468420832 469087884 474667812 475380151 477500666 475444249 477463877 471569863 477647279 475604753 504260307 472500574 121262417 477700023 334506281 477028779 468909535 476783251 470700901 469848107 475382983 473746173 469629194 475569177 267460042 472563051 474663296 470704904 4^5505292 ‘68629488 500403192 477881539 ANDERTON, BRUCE L 31 BOBZIEN. SUE A 31 BOSMA. JAMIE L 12 BRINKHAUS. JOHN F 42 CHESWICK, GARY B 31 CORNICK, JAMES L 31 OEMBOUSKI. JAY C 31 ENGLISH III. IRVING 31 ERICKSON, KURT R 31 FISCHENICH, DAN T 31 FRIT2LER, JOHN M 31 GAFFRON. MICHAEL P 33 GERHAROSON. JOHN R 42 GOMAN. DAVID J 35 GREGORY. JAMES D 42 HALLIN DOROTHY M 12 HANSEN. STEVEN C 42 HANSING, CAROL J 31 HASEMAN. CAROLE 12 JOHNSON. BRADLEY P 31 KARNITZ. RICKY D 31 KENNEN. JANICE M 31 KNUTSON. CHARLOTTE A 15 KUEHN THOMAS M 15 MABUSTH. JEANNE A 33 MOORSE. RONALD J 12 MOROWCZYNSKI. JAMES 31 NELSON. DAVID D 35 OBERAIGNER SCOTT G 42 OBRIEN. RANDY L 92 OMAN LYLE E 33 PALMER, GREGORY A 42 OUAST. WAYNE A 92 RATHBUN BARRY J 92 SKREEN. DALE S 42 STEFFENHAGEN. RONALD 93 SULLIVAN. STEPHEN X 31 THOMTON. MARK R 31 TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE F 31 TOMCZYK, MARK W 31 VANG. BRUCE L 33 VEE, LINDA S 12 WALTERS. LINDA Q 15 WECKMAN. STEPHEN J 33 /* (I YTD GROSS 1013 20 1211.26 1884 56 1426 48 1426 48 1563 30 1210.09 870 63 743 45 1009.74 CURRENT GROSS 1481 92 1481 92 967 36 967 36 57/.28 577 28 1536.60 1536 60 1648 00 1648 00 1426 48 1426 48 1454 54 1464 54 1533.47 1533.47 1454.23 1454 23 1921 29 1921.29 1674 00 1674 00 1404 79 1404.79 2204.24 2204 24 128.25 128.25 1425 12 1425.12 1210 03 1210 08 1013.20 1013.20 466.67 466 6/ 822.28 822.28 1490 59 1490.59 351.85 351.85 224.32 224.32 967.35 967.35 2066 54 2066.54 1759 22 1759.22 2238.40 2238.40 1686 01 1686.01 170 78 170 78 1197.30 1197 30 1032.82 1032.82 1404 77 1404.77 929.57 929.57 1302.60 1302 60 1032.83 1032 83 1013 1211 1884 1426 1428 1563 1210 870 743 1009 26 56 48 48 30 09 63 45 74 54.573 94 '*. I K K 12/22/91 PR: CB PRREGOR 118 EMP • NAME 471688060 474563339 471840871 475443862 472503991 469526026 475989721 468821018 472529007 468701868 507585424 469686562 468420832 469087884 474667812 475380151 477500666 475444249 477463877 471569863 477647279 475804753 504260307 472500574 121262417 477700023 334506281 477028779 468909535 476783251 470700901 469848107 475322983 473746173 469629194 475569177 267460042 472563051 474663296 470704904 475505292 468629488 500403192 477881539 P R ANDERSON. BRUCE L BOB2IEN. SUE A BOSMA. JAMIE L BRINKHAUS, JOHN F CHESWICK. GARY B CORNICK, JAMES L DEMBOUSKI. JAY C ENGLISH III. IRVING ERICKSON, KURT R FISCHENICH. DAN T FRITZLER. JOHN M GAFFRON. MICHAEL GERHARDSON. JOHN GOMAN. DAVID J GREG'^RY. JAMES D HALLIN, DOROTHY M HANSEN. STEVEN C HANSING. CAROL J HASEMAN. CAROLE JOHNSON. BRADLEY P KARNITZ. RICKY D KENNEN. JANICE M KNUTSON. CHARLOTTF A KUEHN. THOMAS M MABUSTH. JEANNE A MOORSE. RONALD J MOROWCZYNSKI. JAMES NELSON, DAVID D OBERAIGNEK. SCOTT Q OBRIEN. RANDY L OMAN, LYLE E PALMER. GREGORY A OUAST. WAYNE A RATH8UN. BARRY J SKREEN. DALE S STEFFENHAGEN. RONALD SULLIVAN. STEPHEN . THOMTON. MARK R TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE F TOMCZYK, MARK W VANG. BRUCE L VEE LINDA S WALTERS. LINDA Q WECKMAN, STEPHEN J DPT YTD CURRENT GROSS GROSS 31 47132 55 1940.393124985.48 958.72 12 14816.03 491.314239559.80 1522.89 31 42824 00 1648.003147007 28 1961 41 31 21870 75 1564 94 31 45124 92 1507 61 31 40302.49 1508 77 31 42898.72 1854 42 31 41375 29 1599 04 33 36166.17 1392 24 42 51266.87 2005 03351938.56 132.59 42 36139 78 1171 13 12 31153 70 1199.28 42 29921.20 1051.203114241.74 529.72 12 6112 22 814 96 31 43123.50 1454 23319742 94 371.55312360 83 266 72 15 24904 55 958.71 15 53143 77 2048 08 33 46659 35 2439 54 12 16088.00 2038.403144244 28 1454 24 35 4821 59 187 48 42 26381 30 955 83 92 31283.13 1023.61 33 36400.46 1392.24 42 26563.41 1094.01 92 35948 85 1290.95 92 31488 85 1349 90 42 30924 42 1048.69 93 31197.14 1200 96 31 18961 04 1884 56 31 31 31 33 1? 1.’ 33 38740 43183 40557 30645 22143 27585 24337 40 93 65 11 43 78 73 1426 1A79 1508 1199 48 97 76 28 862 88 585 57 1000.72 55.377 01 ■Li .. .t -• a •i ?» t 12/08/91 PR. CB PRREGOR EMP • NAME OPT 471688060 474563339 471840871 475443862 472503991 469526028 4/5989721 468821018 472529007 468701868 507585424 469686562 468420832 469U87884 474667812 475380151 477500666 475444249 477463877 471569863 471569863 477647279 475604753 504260307 472500574 121262417 477700023 334506281 477028779 468909535 476783251 470700901 469848107 47-j382983 473746173 469629194 475569177 267460042 472563051 474663296 470704904 475505292 468629488 500403192 477881539 P P ANDERSON. BRUCE L BOBZIEN. SUE A 80SMA. JAMIE L BRINKHAUS. JOHN F CHESWICK, GARY B CORNICK. JAMES L DEMBOUSKI, jay C ENGLISH III. IRVING ERICKSON. KURT R FISCHENICH. DAN T FRITZLER. JOHN M GAFFRON, MICHAEL P GERHARDSON, JOHN R GOMAN, DAVID J GREGORY. JAMES D HALL IN. DOROTHY M HANSEN, STEVEN C HANSING, CAROL J HASEMAN. CAROLE JOHNSON. BRADLEY JOHNSON. BRADLEY KARNITZ. RICKY D KENNEN. JANICE M KNUTSON, CHARLOTTE A KUEHN. THOMAS M MABUSTH. JEANNE a MOORSE, RONALD j MORCWCZYNSKI, JAMES NELSON, DAVID D OBERAIGNER, SCOTT G OBRIEN. RANDY L OMAN. LYLE E PALMER. GREGORY A OUAST. WAYNE A RATHBUN. BARRY J SKREEN. DALE S ItEFFENHAGEN. RONALD SULLIVAN. STEPHEN X thomton. mark R , TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE F TOMCZYK. MARK W VANG. BRUCE L VEE, LINDA S WALTERS. LINDA G WECKMAN. STEPHEN J 31 31 2 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 33 42 35 42 12 2 2 31 *» t 31 31 15 15 33 12 31 35 42 92 33 42 92 92 42 93 31 31 31 31 33 12 15 33 YTD GROSS 72 91 00 87 72 30 25 93 65 42 00 02 26 03 27 39 45192. 16 24026.76 14324 38036 41176 45045 20305 81 43617 31 38793 41044 39776 34773 49261.84 1805.97 34968 29954 28870 13712 5297 40215 41669 937 1 2094 11 23945 84 51095 44219 14049 42/90 4634 25425 30259 52 35008.22 25469 40 34657 30138 29875 29996 15076 37313 41703 39048.89 29445 83 21280 55 27000.21 23337.01 69 81 60 04 1147 90 95 73 18 48 92 96 CURRENT GROSS '’.5 88 00 VI 34 06 1829 4 953.72 538 63 1522 1648 1613 1271 1578 1522.41 1466 60 1599 04 1392.24 2243.03 14 8.52 19 .8 65 11 <9 28 16.9.25 539 814 1508 1454 634 157 958 2048 1743 2238 1672 243 72 1344 50 1820 1392 1292 68 1581.42 1513.01 1676.24 1200.95 1884.56 1426.48 1426 48 1481.50 1199 29 862.88 736.65 1000.72 92 96 76 24 65 98 71 09 52 . 40 38 11 23 59.921.64 • « r 0 •':) K )) 1991 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 11-30-91 PAGE 1 CHECK NO., DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV.• P 0. i MESSAGE H8990 12/12/91 900 00 900.00 • POSTMASTER POSTAGE 01-1262-000-00 MANUAL •••-CKS HC8980 HC8980 12/12/91 12/12/91 30.00 270.00 300.00 * DORSEY/WHITNEY DORSEY /WHITNEY HRA BOND APPLCTN HRA BOND APPLCTN 15-4306-651-00 15-4306-651-00 MANUAL MANUAL HC8981 12/12/91 87.09 87.09 ■ LUNDS BOX LOUNCHES 01-4382-020-11 MANUAL HC8982 12/12/91 80.00 80.00 - MGCSA SEMINAR 74-4356-590-93 MANUAL HC8983 HC8983 HC8983 HC8983 HC8933 HC8983 12/12/91 12/12/91 12/12/91 12/12/91 12/12/91 12/12/91 .?3 13.36 1.00 6.25 61.01 16.42 98.27 • ORONO ORONO ORONO ORONO ORONO ORONO PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 0 i-039-12 01-40^1-129-31 01-4341-129-31 01 4381-249-42 01-4382-022-11 01-4382-039-12 MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL HC8984 HC8984 HC8984 HC8984 ^^08984 HC8984 HC8984 HC8984 HC8984 HC8984 HC8984 HC8984 HC8984 12/12/91 12/12/91 12/12/91 12/12/91 12/12/91 12/12/91 12/12/91 12/12/Cl 12/12/91 12/12/91 12/12/91 12/12/91 12/12/91 96.91 419.98 302.54 6S.82 126.76 20.97 .03 498.92 24.10 908.85 149.91 224.86 88.03 2.927 68 • 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL 1ST NATL FICA 11/13/91 FICA 11/13/91 FICA 11/13/91 FICA 11-13-91 FICA 11/13/91 FICA 11-13-91 FICA 11-13-91 FICA 11-13-91 FICA 11-13-91 FICA 11-13-91 FICA 11-13-91 FICA 11-13-91 FICA 11-13-91 01-4142-020-11 01-4142-039-12 01-4142-069-15 01-4142-111-31 01-4142-115-31 01-4142-121-31 01-4142-174-33 01-4142-174-33 01-4142-185-35 01-4142-249-42 72- 4142-549-91 73- 4142-569-92 74- 4142-590-93 MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL HC898S HC898S HC8985 HC8985 HC898S HC8985 12/12/91 12/12/91 12'12/91 12/12/91 12/12/91 12/12/91 194.20 219 29 81 44 16 56 763 74 62.21 1.337.44 • NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES U11L1TIES UTILITIES 01-4324-099-17 01-4324-129-31 0.-4324-249-42 01-4324-290-61 73- 4324-569-92 74- 4324-590-93 MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL HC89te 12/12/91 53.64 53.64 * US WEST TELEPHONE 72-43“0-549-91 MANUAL HCI987 12/12/91 145.00 145.00 ■ SAFE BENEFT BILLING 01-. -000-00 MANUAL HC898S 12/12/91 120.00 120.00 * MED CTR NO'' INS 01-4151-129-31 MANUAL , •V HC8989 12/12/91 30 00 MN DEPT REV OCT SALES TX 01-2222-000-00 MANUAL % • . J 1991 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 11-30-91 PAGE 2 CHECK NO.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV.1 P.O. 8 MESSAGE HC8989 HC8989 HC8989 HC8989 12/12/91 *2/12/91 12/12/91 12/12/91 11.00 7.00 241.00 379 .00 668.00 ft MN DEPT REV HN DEPT REV MN DEPT REV MN DEPT REV OCT SALES TX OCT SALES TX OCT SALES TX CCT SALTS TX 03-3500-000-00 01-3516-000-00 72-2222-000-00 74-2222-000-00 MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL « A • ft ft A •••-CKS HC8991 12/12/91 1.327.00 1,327 00 ft SAFE BENEFITS DEC FEE 01-1050-000-00 MANUAL HC8992 HC8992 HC8992 12/12/91 12/12/91 12/12/91 350.00 7.00 63.00 420.00ft POSTMASTER POSTMASTER POSTMASTER POSTAGE POSTAGE POSTAGE 01-4321-129-31 01-4321-175-34 01-4321-175-34 MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL HC8993 12/12/91 26.65 26.65a APPOLLO PIPING INC REPAIR GS85 73-4344-569-92 MANUAL HC8994 12/12/91 16.50 16 50 ft CITY OF WAYZATA AUTO LICENSE 01-4383-129-31 MANUAL HC8995 12/12/91 2.603 59 2.603 59 ft 1ST NATL 8K LAKES FICA Cl-1299-000-00 MANUAL HC8996 HC8996 HC8996 HC8996 12/12/91 12/12/91 12/12/91 I2y 12/91 200.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 500.00ft TERO MAAB TERI NAAB TERI NAAB TERI NAAB 10/28-11/12 MTQ PLANNING MTG PARK MTG PUBHRNG 11-20 01-4306-020-11 01-4306-174-33 01-4305-290-61 24-4306-408-00 MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL 9,141.82 300.00 100 00 444.55 1.015.25 609.24 FUND 01 TOTAL FUND 15 TOTAL FUND 24 TOTAL FUND 72 TOTAL FUND 73 TOTAL FUND 74 TOTAL GENERAL FUND BUILONG CAPITAL OUTLAY PERM IMPROVE REVOLVING WAlER OPERATING FUND SEWER OPERATING FUND GOLF COURSE OPERATING F F FD •••-CKS f 3[- J 11.610 86 TOTAL : • i t f . % 3 . o o1991 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. PATE 350010 350014 350065 350065 350081 350085 • ft a * • • 350U4 350133 350130 350130 **•••• 350142 350142 350142 350142 350143 350143 350143 350143 350143 350143 350143 350143 350143 350143 350143 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 AMOUNT 11.18 11.18 • 69.54 69.54 • 146.97 53.25 200.22 19.84 19.84 • 8 89 8.89 • 164.25 164 25 * 65.16 .01 206.15 271 32 • CHECK REGISTERVENDOR AT&T INFO SYSTEM ALL STAR ELECTRIC BLACKOWIAK & SONS BLACKOWIAK 4 SONS BLACKS PHOTOGRAPHY BUDGET PRINTING CITYVIEW PLMBQ 4. HTG COLONIAL LIFE INS CO COLONIAL LIFE INS CO COLONIAL LIFE INS CO 12/16/91 93 00 COPY DUP PR12/16/91 1.166.15 COPY DUP PR12/16/91 2.932.00 COPY DUP PR12/16/91 211 95 4,433 10 • COPY DUP PR 12/16/91 1 95 commercial12/16/91 16 99 COMMERCIAL12/16/91 25 65 COMMERCIAL12/16/91 16.85 COMMERCIAL12/16/91 3 40 COMMERCIAL12/16/91 45.07 COMMERCIAL12/18/91 6 89 COMMERCIAL12/16/91 2f 19 COMMERCIAL12/16/91 1.87 COMMERCIAL12/16/91 2 78 COW^ERCIAL12/18/91 85 COMMERCIAL INC INC INC ITEM DESCRIPTION TELEPHONE REPAIR TRASH HAUL TRASH HAUL PHOTO REFINISH POSTAGE REPAIR DEC INS DEC INS DEC INS TRANSPTN MNT BAL 12/91 MAINT COST 12/11/92 RENTAL LIFE/GR.’DEC INS LIFE/GRP DEC INS LIFE/GRO DEC INS LIFE/GRP DEC INS LIFE/GRP DEC INS LIFE/GRP DEC INS LIFE/GRP DEC INS LIFE/GRP DEC INS LIFE/GRP DEC INS LIFE/GRP DE INS LIFE/GRP DE .INS 12-17-91 PAGEACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. 8 MESSAGE 72-4320-549-91 01-4233-249-42 01-4343-099-17 01-4343-129-31 01-4210-129-31 01-4321-129-31 01-4343-098-17 01-4152-121-31 01-4152-126-31 01-4152-129-31 01-1261-000-00 01-1283-000-00 01-1283-000-00 01-4210-129-31 01-3872 01-4152 01-4152 01-4152 01-4152 01-4152 01-4152 01-4152 72- 4152 73- 4152 74- 4152 000-00 039-12 069-15 121-31 126-31 129-31 174-33 249-42 549-91 569-92 590-93 •»»-CKS •••-CKS *««-CKS ••• -CKS • • • -CKS « • •-CKS •••-CKS r 1991 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE350141 350150 350150 350256 350256 350256 350270 350278 350278 350286 350303 350337 350337 350337 350337 350337 350372 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/18/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 0 AMOUNT142.59 • 347.83 347.83 • 41.50 10.30 51.80 • 892 25 1 94 13.09 907.28 • 27.84 27 84 • 23 00 34 50 57.50 • 44.30 44 30 ‘ 2.775.00 2.775.00 • 2.18 2.88 2 88 2 88 2 87 14.39 * 86 40 86.40 ■ CHECK REGISTERvendor item description CRYSTEEL DKT INC CULLIGAN culligan GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO GRAINGER-W W GOPHER STATE ONECALL GOPHER STATE ONECALL HARRIS OFFICE EQUIP HENN CTY FIN DIV IMS/MN IMS/MN IMS/MN IMS/MN IMS/HN JOHNS AUTO SUPPLY il PAARTS WTR SOFTNER WTR SOFTNER PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS NOV FEE NOV FEE REPAIR CALC OCT ROOM/BOARO DEICER 12-17-91 PAGE 2 ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P 0. 8 MESSAGE 01-4232-249-42 01-4343-099-17 74-4343-590-93 01-4232-249-42 73-4232-569 92 73-4234-569-92 01-4232-249-42 72- 4306-549-91 73- 4306-569-92 01-4340-069-15 01-4358-080-16 MSTER TAPE 01-4210-039-12METERTAPE01-4210-069-15METERTAPE01-4210-174-33METERTAPE01-4210-249-42METERTAPE73-4210-569-92 01-4220-249-42 *“-CKS "••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS • > •-CKS •••-CK<! •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS ! •••-CKS ! 11 ©1991 CITY CF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE 350598 350615 350631 « « « ft ft ft 350661 350669 350675 350693 350719 350740 350740 12/16/91 35Q602 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 350631 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/11/91 12/16/91 O AMOUNT 12.00 12.00 • 465.2S 465 25 • 6 20 6.20 • 3.390 00 3.390.00 • 107.00 107.00 • 27.97 27.97 • 50.09 50.09 * 2.093 96 2.093 96 • 7.452 00 7.452.00 • 35 00 35.00 • 66 00 30 SO66 so « oCHECK REGISTERvendor item DESCRIPTION PERA INS DEC INS PAPER CALMENSON & CO PARTS PERRYS VENTURES INC CAR WASH POLKA DOT RECYCLING NOV FEE PRAIRIE OFFSET INSPECTION FORM SCHARBER & SONS INC PARTS RITZ CAMTRA FILM DEVELOP ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE SCHOENING EXCAVATING HAULING SWEEPING DIXIE PFTRO-CHEM DEMURRAGE STREICHERS STREICHERS BADGE REPAIR €3 o ^ -12-17-91 PAGE 5 ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P O. • MESSAGE 01-4152-129-31 01-4232-249-42 01-4342-249-42 01-4392-295-65 01-4322-174-33 01-4232-249-4? 01-4210-129-31 01-1260-000-00 01-4331-249-42 72-4234-549-91 01-4221-129-31 01-4342-129-31 •••-CKS *••-CKS •••-CKS ■■•-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS ■••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS o i o199! CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE ft CHECK REGISTERAMOUNTVENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION OK-17-91 PAGE 6 ACCOUNT NO. INV. t P.O. I MESSAGE 350775 350775 12/16/91 12/16/91 505 00 200.00 705.00 • TOWN & COUNTRY TOWN & COUNTRY DEC CLEANING DEC CLEANING 01-4343-099-17 01-4343-129-31 350779 12/16/91 320.10 320.10 ft TRACY OIL CO FUEL OIL 74-4324-590-93 350815 350815 350815 350815 350815 350815 350815 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/ */91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 48. g:i 58.81 74.14 27.41 53.64 22.42 33.22 318.57 ft US WEST COMMUN US WEST COHMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN TELEPHONE TEL :hohe TELEPHONE DATA PROC TELEPHONE DATA PROC DATA PROC 01-4320-129-31 01-4320-129-31 01-4320-175-34 01-4355-069-15 72-4320-549-91 72- 4355-549-91 73- 4355-559-92 350821 350821 12/16/91 12/16/91, 268.98 6.97 275.95 ft village CHEVROLET VILLAGE CHEVROLET PART PART 01-4232-249-42 01-4232-290-61 350835 350835 12/16/91 12/16/91 81.00 9.00 90.00 A WARNING IITES OF MN WAR’ING LITES OF MK FLASHERS FLASHERS 01-4L31-249-42 01-4331-249-42 350845 12/16/91 3.12 3.12 t UECKMAN STEPHEN MILEAGE 01-4381-174-33 350850 12/16/91 24.00 24.00 ft WEST PUBLISHING STATUTES 01-4240-129-31 350875 12/16/91 8.28 8.28 ft WRIGHT HENN ELECTRIC UTILITIES 01-4324-249-42 350901 12/16/91 65 00 05.00 ft GRAFIX SHOPPE REPAIR 01-4341-129-31 350902 12/16/91 68.65 68 65 ft NATL FIRE ASSOC BOOK 01-4240-174-33 ■ ft A -CKS •••-CKo -••-CKS ••*-CKS •••-CKS ■••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS i %1991 CITY OF ORONO r ,tCK NO. DATE350377 350391 350391 350395 350395 350400 350459 350462 350462 350474 350477 350477 350477 35047/ 350477 35047V 350415 350415 3504|i * . t* 12/16/91 12/i8/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/18/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12 16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/U/91 12/16/91 12/16/Sl 12/16/91 AMO'JNT 65 68 85.68 * 11.08 15.60 26.68 • 23.25 43.85 67.10 • 228 SO 221.90 * 35.90 35.90 • 79.36 612.09 691.45 643 50 843 50 • 70. OC • 88- 8 89- 55 38 8.89- 8 88- 89 84 • 13 50 31 50 45 00 70 00 70 00 • (5CHECK RCIISTERVENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTIONJOHNSON/BRADLEY KNUTSON/CHARLCTTE KNUTSON/CHA; 0T1t KOEHNENS STANDARD KOEHNENS STANDARD KUSTOM signals INC MACOUEEN EQUIPMENT MARTINS NAVARRE. 66 MARTINS NAVARRE 66 CLASS MILEAGE MILEAGE GASOLINE REPAIR REPAIR PART GASOLINE REPAIR MPLS OXYGEN CO orMURRAGEMPLSOXYGEN CO DEMURRAGE STAR TRIBUNE AD o12-17-91 PAGE 3 ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P 0. • MESSAGE01-4356-129-31 01-4381-069-15 73-4381-569-92 01-4220-129-31 01-4341-129-31 01-4342-129-31 01-4232-249-42 01-4220-249-42 01-4341-129-31 METRO WASTE SAC CHRG 01-2226-000-00 MIDWEST B5NS PROD OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-039-12MIDWESTBSNSPROOOFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210 059-14MIDWESTBSNSPRCX)Of FICF SUPPllES 01-42x0-069-15MIDWESTBSNSPROOOFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-129-31MIDWESTBSNSPROOOFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-1/4-33MIDWESTBSNSPROOOFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-249-42 01-4232-129-31 01-4232-249-42 01-4323-129-31 •••-CKS •••-ci;s •••-CKS •••-CKS ■••-CKS ■••-CKS ■■•-CKS ***-CKS i 3S0S4S 350S4B 3S054I 350S4I 350544 350544 350562 350562 350597 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 ■ V .1991 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTERCHECK NO DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV 350490 12/16/91 434 46 MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 01-4324-099-17 350490 12/16/91 47.74 MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 01-4324-129-31 350490 12/16/91 13.83 MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 72-4324-549-91 350490 12/16/91 357.54 853.57 • MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 73-4324-569-92 350495 12/16/91 24 98 24 98 • MN BENEFIT ASSN INS 01-4152-129-31 350491 12/16/91 144 00 MN CELLULAR TElE TELEPHONE 01-4320-129 31 350498 12/16/91 20.60 164 60 • MN CELLULAR TELE TELEPHONE Cl-4320-249-42 350505 12/16/91 62 10 MN FIRE ^ SAFETY REPAIR FIRE EXTG 01-4324-099-1735050512/16/91 99 36 MN FIRE SAFETY REPAIR FIRE EXTG 01-4324-249-4235050512/16/91 30 00-MN FIRE 1 SAFETY REPAIR FIRE EXTG 72-4324-549-9135050512/16/91 72 23 MN FIRE 1 SAFETY REPAIR FIRE EXTG 72-4324-549-9135050512/16/91 44 71 248 40 • MN FIRE A SAFETY REPAIR FIRE EXTG 73-4324-569-92 350546 12/16/91 300 00 NAAB TERRI 1l/25>12/4-12/9 01-4306-020-113S0S4612/16/91 100 00 400 00 • NAAB TERRI 12/3 01-4306-290-61 117 12 76 16 17 10 250 20 57 51 68 43 09 48 NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 93 11 142 10 235 21 *,464 44 4 464 44 * NSP NSP UTILITIES UIILITIES PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 11/25-12/8 1-4210 01-4231 01-4232 01-4232 73-4232 73-4234 129-31 099-17 249-42 249-42 569-92 569-92 01-4324-249-42 73-4324-569-92 01-2031-000-00 12-17-91 PAGE 4 • P 0 9 MESSAGE **'-CKS ••*-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS • ••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS 1991 CITY OF 090NO CHECK REGISTERCHECK NO.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV 3S0903 12/16/91 137 00 137.00 • HENN CTV TREASURER LICENSE 74-1299-000-00 350904 12/16/91 2.055.00 2.055.00 • HOTSY CORP STEAMER MCHN 14-4560-633-00 3S092S 350925 350925 12/16/91 12/16/91 12/16/91 10.599 40 13.706 60 35.883 54 60,189 54 ■ B & D UNDERGROUND B & D UNDERGROUND B & D UNDERGROUND TH 12 FRONTG STi2 TH12 FRONTAGE STSi? TH12 FRONTAGE WTRI2 15-4532-651-00 24-4531-426-00 24-4531-426-00 32.646 35 2.055 00 10.599 40 49.590.14 203 17 675 87 468 25 FUND 01 TOTAL FUND 14 TOTAL FUND r TOTAL FUND 24 TOTAL FUND 72 TOTAL FUND 73 TOTAL FUND 74 TOTAL GENERAL FUND IMPROVE A EQUIP OUTLAY BUILDNG CAPITAL OUTLAY PERM IMPROVE REVOLVING WATER OPERATING FUND SEWER OPERATING FUND GOLF COURSE OPERATING F F F FD £6.238 18 TOTAL » ;12-17-91 PAGE • P 0 It MESSAGE •••-CKS • • *-CKS 1992 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE CHECK REGISTER 013207 013207 013207 013207 013207 013207 013207 013207 013207 013207 013207 013275 013275 013275 013275 01/09/92 01/08/92 01/08/92 01/08/92 01/08/92 01/08/92 01/08/92 01/08/92 01/08/92 01/08/92 01/08/92 01/08/92 01/08/92 01/08/92 01/08/92 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 26 2 287 1.207 403 881 846 148 348 471 581 645 1,055 46.872 1,205 130 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 52 76 BERKLEY BERKLEY BERKLEY BERKLEY BERKLEY BERKLEY BERKLEY BERKLEY BERKLEY BERKLEY BERKLEY AOMIN'STRATR ADMINISTRATR ADMINISTRATR ADMINISTRATR ADMINISTRATR ADMINISTRATR ADMINISTRATR ADMINISTRATR ADMINISTRATR ADMINISTRATR ADMINISTRATR WORKER WORKER WORKER WORKER WORKER WORKER WORKER WORKER WORKER WORKER WORKER lOMP COMP COMP COMP COMP COMP COMP COMP COMP COMP COMP INS INS INS INS INS INS INS INS INS INS INS 502 00 251 2.089 00 28 GROUP HEALTH INC GROUP HEALTH INC GROUP HEALTH INC GROUP HEALTH INC JAN INS JAN INS JAN INS JAN INS ACCOUNT NO INV 013020 01/08/92 30.890 00 AMERICAN NATL BANK ACCRD INT 12-31-91 72-2150-000-00 013020 01/08/92 6,180 00 AMERICAN NATL BANK REV BOND INT DUE2/1 72-4820-909-88 013020 01/01/92 30 00 AMERICAN NATL BANK ACCRD INT 12-31-91 73-2150-000-00 013020 01/08/92 30.140 00 AMERICAN NATL BANK ACCRD INT 12-31-91 73-2150-000-00 013020 OJ/08/92 6,035. 73.275 00 00 • AMERICAN NATL BANK REV BOND INT DUE2/1 73-4620-910-09 013199 01/08/92 27 33 ROLF E ERICKSON SUPPLIES 01-4210-059-14 013199 01/08/92 5.650 5.67 7 00 33 • ROLF E ERICKSON JAN FEE 01-4307-059-14 01-4153 01-4153 01-4153 01-4153 01-4153 01-4153 01-4153 01-4153 72- 4153 73- 4153 74- 4153 020-11 039-12 069-15 129-31 174-33 185-35 249-42 290-61 549-91 569-92 590-93 01-4151-129-31 01-4151-174-33 01-4151-249-42 74-4151-590-93 013347 01/08/92 100 100 00 00 • INTL 4SSN CH OF POL DUES 01-4380-129-31 013353 01/08/92 29 70 INTL MAILING SYSTEMS POSTAGE MTR 01-4321-039-1201335301/08/92 29 70 INTL MAILING SYSTEMS 181*3/31/92 01-4321-069-1501335301/01/92 29 70 INTL MAILING SYSTEMS 181-3/31/92 01-4321-174-3301335301/08/92 29 70 INTL MAILING SYSTEMS 181-3/31/92 01-4321-249-4201335301/08/92 29 148 70 50 • INTL MAILING SYSTEMS 181-3/31/92 73-4321-569-92 013487 01/08/92 130 80 MED CTR HEALTH CARE JAN INS 01-4151-069-1501348701/08/92 130 80 MED CTR HEALTH CARE JAN INS 01-4151-129-3101346701/08/9?502 02 MED CTR health care JAN INS 01-4151-174-33 01-13-92 PAGE 1 i P.O. 8 MESSAGE •••-CKS •••-CKS * « A -CKS At#-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS > / 1992 CITY OF OKONO CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV 013467 01/08/02 130 80 894 42 A MED CTR HEALTH CARE JAN INS 01-4151-249-42 013474 01/01/92 16,291 00 16,291 00 ft METRO WASTE JAN FEE 73-1282-030-00 01349S 01/08/92 24 98 24.98 M MN BENEFIT ASSN JAN INS 01-4152-129-31 013500 01/08/92 1,631 50 1,631 50 • MINN COMM TELEPHONE 01-4320-129-31 013540 01/08/02 7,500.00 7,500 00 A MINNETONKA LEGAL PROS 1ST QTR 01-4302-080-16 Ol/Ot/92 4.106 68 4.106 68 m PERA 12/24-1/5 01-2031-000-00 013507 01/08/92 4,18b 74 4.185 74 i PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 12/9-12/2 01-2031-000-00 013501 01/08/92 12 00 12 00 A PERA INS JAN INS 01-4152-129-31 013620 01/08/02 21 50 21.50 A POSTMASTER PO BOX RENTAL 01-1262-000-00 013150 01/08/02 100.00 100.00 A WESTONKA CHMBR COM DUES 01-4380-039-12 013072 01/08/02 335 00 335 00 A STRINGER BUSINESS FAX *1NT AQ2/92-1/93 01-4340-129-31 013073 01/08/02 75 00 75 00 A SENSIBLE LAND USE MEMBERSHIP 01-4380-174-33 013074 01/08/92 20 00 AMEN DUES 01-4380-129-31 01-13-92 PAGF { .» •••-CKS *»*-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS * * «-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS ‘ ; 1992 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTERCHECK NO.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV 20 00 • 013975 01/06/92 90.00 90.00 t NORTHEAST METRO TECH SEMINAR 01-4356-249-42 013976 01/01/92 150.00 150.00 M DAKOTA RAIL INC LEASE 74-4323-590-93 013976 01/08/92 15 00 15.00 9 METRO AREA MGMT ASSO DUES 01-4380-039-12 013879 • 01/06/92 439.00 439 00 9 ICMA DUES 01-4380-039-12 013910 01/06/92 75.00 75.00 9 INTL CONF BLDG OFF DUES 01-4380-174-33 013961 01/06/92 25 00 25.00 9 INTL ASSOC PLUMBING DUES 01-4380-174-33 013962 01/06/92 120 00 120.00 9 HENN CTV CHIEFS DUES 01-4380-129-31 013913 01/08/92 25.00 25.00 « MEMA DUES 01-4380-129-31 013964 01/06/92 50 00 50.00 9 MCPOA DUES 01-4380-129-31 01396S 01/06/92 220 00 220.00 9 CHIEFS OF POLICE DUES 01-4380-129-31 66,291 ^3 36.651 00 56.170 70 1,456.00 FUND 01 TOTAL FUND 72 TOTAL FUND 73 TOTAL FUND 74 TOTAL GENERAL FUND WATER OPERATING FUND SEWER OPERATING FUND GOLF COURSE OPERATING FD 164,568.93 TOTAL 01-13-92 PAGE ; A‘ > «?■ 4 C ••*-CKS •••-CKS 1991 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE CHECK REGISTER365014 365015 365030 365030 365030 365030 365030 365030 365043 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 AMOUNT119 74 119 74 • 22 37 22 37 • 24 89 24 89 VENDOR ALL STAR ELECTRIC AT&T ITEM DESCRIPTION REPAIR TELEPHONE 40 24 24 24 164 45 89 89 89 90 AT & T INFO SYSTEM AT & T INFO SYSTEM AT & T INFO SYSTEM AT & T INFO SYSTEM AT & T INFO SYSTEM AT & T INFO SYSTEM DATA DATA DATA DATA DATA DATA PROC PROC PROC PROC PROC PROC 49 50 49 50 ARMOR LOCK REPAIR LOCK ACCOUNT NO INV 01-4343-129-31 74-4320-590-93 01-4340-059-14 01-4340-069-15 01-4340-129-31 01-4340-129-31 01-4340 174-33 01-4340-249-42 01-4343-129-31 36506S 01/07/92 200 200 22 22 • BLACKOWIAK & SONS TRASH HAUL 01-4343-099-17 36S072 01/07/92 6 6 90 90 • BOYER FORD TRUCK PA RT 01-4232-249-42 365074 01/08/92 100 00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ENG RETAINER-OCT 01-4304-200-41 365074 01/01/92 75 00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ENG-OCT 01-4305-200-41 36S074 01/08/92 186 80 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN MSA GEN-OCT 01-4305-249-4236507401/08/92 375 00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ENG-OCT 01-4305-249-4236:>074 01/08/92 67 50 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN SEAL COAT IMP OCT 01-4305-249-4238507401/08/92 300 00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN DOT TH12 SAFETY INS 01-4305-299-72J6507401/08/92 1.239 44 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ENG APPLIC-OCT 01-4305-840-7136507401/08/92 75 00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ENG-WALVATNE-OCT 01-4305-840-7138507401/08/92 313 32 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ENG MCCULLY RD 23-4305-354-0036507401/08/92 1.441 17 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN INSP MCCULLY RD-OCT 23-4306-354-0036507401/08/92 1.099 . 13 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN STUBBS BAYSWR REPRT 24-4305-408-0036507401/08/92 1.111 S3 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ENG-WTR EXT 91-2 24-4305-426-0036507401/08/92 1 . 167 27 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ENG-WTR EXT 91-2 24-4305-426-0036507401/08/92 345 05 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ENG-^ TORM SWR 91-2 24-4305-426-0036507401/08/92 383 39 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ENG-SWR EXT91-2 24-4305-426-0038507401/08/92 525 00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ENG-OCT 25-4305-484-0036507401/08/92 1.993 61 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ENG FRONTAGE RD 91-2 25-4305-486-0036507401/08/92 265 00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN OCT ENG-CONSTR 89 72-43U5-436-8436507401/08/92 260 00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN OCT ENG-CONSTR 89 73-4305-434-8236507401/08/92 150 00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ENG-OCT 73-4305-569-9236507401/08/92 384 11.857 30 81 • BONESTROO ROSENE ASN LS 11 RENOV-OCT 73-4531-569-92 01-13-92 PAGE 1 • P 0 • MESSAGE ••• -CKS •••-CKS • *•-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS ( 1991 CITY OF ORONO i CHECK NO. DATE 365110 365111 365141 365154 365154 365157 365226 01/07/92 01/07/92 365127 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 365192 01/08/92 365212 01/07/92 365213 01/07/92 01/08/92 365240 01/07/92 365256 01/07/92 r CHECK REGISTERAMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 62 00 62.00 * 7 85 7.85 • 118 00 118 00 • 52.68 52 68 ^ 178 85 191 . 85 370 70 • 477 76 477 76 28.031 25 28.031 25 • 22 50 22 50 * 5.265 00 5,285 00 • 770 00 770 00 • 3^' 00 39 00 * 158 46 CHAPIN PUBLISHING CHESWICK/GARY COFFIN GRONBERG CRYSTEEL DIST INC CYS UNIFORMS CYS UNIFORMS DAHLGREN SHARDLOW EHLERS A ASSOC INC EXPRESS MESSENGER E Z RECYCLING FIRST TRUST CO INC FRITZLER J MARK GENUINE PARTS CO BID ADV CuASS SURVEY/SAGA HILL PARTS UNIFORM/JOHNSON UNIFORM/NELSON PARK PLANNING BOND CONSUL FEE POSSTAGE DEC RECYCLING PAYING AGENT FEE MTG PARTS Cil-13-92 PACE 2 ACCOUNT NO. INV. i P 0. • MESSAQF 01-4323-249-42 01-4J56-129-31 01-4306-249-42 01-4232-249-42 01-4221 129 31 t 1-4221-18'/ 12-4306-385-00 25-4306-480-00 Oi-4321-174-33 01-4392-295-65 45-4630-908-00 01-4356-129-31 01-4232-129-31 o ***-CKS ••*-CKS ***-CKS •••-CKS ■ • •-CKS -CKS • • •-CKS -CKS •••-CKS -CKS 1991 CITY OF 090N0 CHECK REGISTERCHECK NO.DATE 365256 365256 365256 365256 365256 365256 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 ***••• 365256 01/07/92 •••••• 365272 365272 365272 365272 385272 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 AMOUNT VENDOR 567 567 14 14 567.14- 3 3 40 772 92 40 00 92 GENUINE GENUINE GENUINE GENUINE GENUINE GENUINE PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS CO CO CO CO CO CO ITEM DESCRIPTION PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS 56 40 56.40 • GLENWOOO INGLEWOOD WATER 555 84 13 55 II 720 17 56 76 04 70 23 • G & K SERVICES G A K SERVICES G A K SERVICES G A K SERVICES G A K SERVICES UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS ACCOUNT NO INV 01-4232 01-4232 01-4232 01-4232 73-4234 73-4234 249-42 24T-42 249-42 290-61 569-92 569-92 01-4324-099-17 01-4221-249-42 01-4343-129-31 72- 4221-549-91 73- 4221-569-92 74- 4221-590-93 365303 01/07/92 2.411 56 2.411 56 HENN CTY FIN DIV NOV ROOM/BOARD 01-4358-080-16 365304 01/07/92 10 75 DEPT PROPERTY TAX POSTAGE 01-4321-040-13 365304 01/07/92 i33 00 143 75 % DEPT PROPERTY TAX DNR LAKE ACCESS 01-4900-299-72 365301 01/07/92 148 32 HENN CTY SHERIFF DPT REPAIR 01-4342-129-31 36S30I 01/07/82 379.71 528.03M HENN CTY SHERIFF DPT NOV BOOKING FEE 01-4358-080-16 365309 01/06/92 1.091 65 1,091.65A HENN COUNTY TREAS TRUTH IN TAX-EXP 01-4323-U20-11 365337 01/07/92 4 15 IMS/MN INK ROLLER 01-4210-039-1236533701/07/82 4 15 IMS/MN INK ROLLER 01-4210-069-15 365337 01/07/92 4.15 IMS/MN INK ROLLER 01-4210-174-3336533701/07/92 4 14 IMS/MN INK ROLLER 01-4210-249-4236533701/07/92 4 14 20 73 A IMS/MN INK ROLLER 73-4210-569-92 365315 01/07/92 22 26 22 26 A KEAVENYS DRUG FILM Ul -4210-249-42 01-13-92 PAGE 3 9 P.O • MESSAGE * * *-CKS • * ft -CKS •••-CKS • * *-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS • k *-CKS o 1991 CITY OF OftONO CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV 365395 01/07/92 48 35 48.35 • KOEHNENS STANDARD REPAIR 01-4341-129-31 365397 01/08/92 56 02 KUEHN-THOMAS MILEAGE DECEMBER 01-4381-069-15 365397 01/08/92 14.89 KUEHN-THOMAS MILEAGE DECEMBER 01-4381-174-33 365397 01/08/92 20.84 91.75 • KUEHN-THOMAS MILEAGE DECEMBER 73-4381-569-92 365401 01/C8/92 682 50 682 50 • LABOR RELATNS ASSOC ARBITRATION/LELS 01-4306-129-31 365404 01/07/92 279 48 1.I LAKER AD 01-4322-039-1236S40401/07/92 45 62 THE LAKER AD 01-4322-069-1536540401/07/92 25 . 13 THE LAKER AD 01-4322-249-4236540401/07/92 15.20 THE LAKER AD 72-4322-549-9136540401/07/92 25 36 THE LAKER AO 73-4322-569-9236540401/07/92 15 20 405 99 • THE LAKER AD 74-4322-590-93 365435 01/08/92 123 00 LOGIS - SUITE 300 MNT HP 150 01-4340-039- 236543501/08/92 123.00 LOGIS - SUITE 300 MNT HP 150 01-4340-174-3336543501/08/92 791.11 LOGIS - SUITE 300 LOGIS APPL SUPP NOV 01-4352-069-1536543501/08/92 79111 LOGIS - SUITE 300 LOGIS APPL SUPP-DEC 01-4352-069-1536543501/08/92 458 60 LOGIS - SUITE 300 LOGIS APPL SUPP NOV 01-4352-129-3136543501/08/92 458 60 LOGIS - SUITE 300 LOGIS APPL SUPP-DEC 01-4352-129-3136543501/08/92 240.77 LOGIS - SUITE 300 LOGIS APPL SUPP NOV 01-4352-174-3336543501/08/92 240.77 LOGIS - SUITE 300 LOGIS APPL SUPP-DEC 01-4352-174-3336543501/08/92 49.09 LOGIS - SUITE 300 DATA PROC-DEC 01-4355-039-1236543501/08/92 88 18 LOGIS - SUITE 300 DATA PROC-NOV 01-4355-039-1236543501/08/92 525 11 LOGIS - SUITE 300 DATA PROC-NOV 01-4355-069-1536543501/08/92 657 60 LOGIS - SUITE 300 DATA PROC-DEC 01-4355-069-1536543501/08/92 845 45 LOGIS - SUITE 300 DATA PROC-NOV 01-4355-129-3136543501/08/92 845 43 LOGIS - SUITE 300 DATA PROC-DEC 01-4355-129-3136543501/08/92 352.96 LOGIS - SUITE 300 DATA PROC-NOV 01-4355-174-3336543501/08/92 314.81 LOGIS - SUITE 300 DATA PROC-DEC 01-4355-174-3336543501/08/92 144.46 LOGIS - SUITE 300 LOGIS APPL SUPP-DtC 72-4352-549-9136543501/08/92 144 46 LOGIS - SUITE 300 LOGIS APPL SUPP NOV 72-4352-549-9136543501/08/92 49 84 LOGIS - SUITE JOO DATA PROC-NOV 72-4355-549-9136543501/08/92 43 45 LOGIS - SUITE 300 DATA PROC-DEC 72-4355-549-9136543501/08/92 337 07 LOGIS - SUITE 300 LOGIS APPL SUPP NOV 73-4352-569-9136543501/08/92 337 07 LOGIS - SUITE 300 LOGIS APPL SUPP-DEC 73-4352-569-9236543501/08/32 127 06 LOGIS - SUITE 300 DATA PROC-NOV 73-4355-569-9236543501/08/62 112 70 8.201 70 • LOGIS - SUITE 300 DATA PROC-DEC 73-4355-569-92 01-13-92 PAGE 4 • P 0 • MESSAGE •••-CKS • * *-CKS •‘•-CKS * « *-CKS •••-CKS V k / 1991 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE 365439 365441 365441 365461 01/C7/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 Ol/Ot/62 AMOUNT CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 65 27 68 27 LONG LK FORD TRACTOR REPAIR 23 00 95 30 118 30 LONG LAKE TIRE SERV LONG LAKE TIRE SERV REPAIRS REPAIR 575.00 575 00 MALLOY KARNOWSKI CO HRA BOND REVIEW 346.13 ■ 365415 01/07/92 13.50 MPLS OXYGEN CO DEMURRAGAE36548501/07/02 4 50 MPLS OXYGEN CO OEMURRAGAE36548501/07/92 78 57 96 57 • MPLS OXYGEN CO OXYGEN 365490 01/07/02 790 08 MINNEQASCO UTIiTTIES 365490 01/07/92 130 98 MINNEGASCO UTUITIES36549001/07/92 57 83 MINNEGASCO UTILITIES36549001/07/92 444 30 1,423 19 • MINNEGASCO utilities 365491 01/07/92 150 52 MN CELLULAR TELE TELEPHONE ACCOUNT NO INV 01-4342-249-42 01-4342-249-42 01-4342-249-42 25-4306-480-00 365462 01/08/92 38 60 MARTINS NAVARRE 66 GAS 01-4220-249-42 365462 01/07/92 1.078 62 MARI INS NAVARRE 66 REPAIR 01-4341-129-31 1,117.22 • 365477 01/06/92 25.00 MIDWEST BSNS PROD OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-039-12 365477 01/07/92 25.59 MIDWEST BSNS PROD OFMCE SUPPLIES 01-4210-039-1“ 365477 01/07/9’17 01 MIDWEST BSNS PROD OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-059-136547701/08/92 2 93 MIDWEST BSNS PROD OFFICE SYPPLIES 01-4210-059-14. 365477 01/01/92 .01 MIDWEST BSNS PROD OFFICE SYPPLIES 01-4210-069-1536547701/07/92 17.01 MIDWEST BSNS PROD OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-069-1536547701/08/92 2 91 MIDWEST BSNS PROD OFFICE SYPPLIES 01-4210-069-1536547701/07/92 79 94 MIDWEST BSNS PROD SUPPLIES 01-4210-129-31 365477 01/08/92 2 93 MIDWEST BSNS PROD OFFICE SYPPLIES 01-4210-129-31 365477 01/07/92 129 36 MIDWEST BSNS PROD OFFICE supplies 01-4210-129-3136547701/01/92 6 48 MIDWEST BSNS PROD OFFICE SYPPLIES 01-4210-174-3336547701/07/92 17 02 MIDWEST BSNS PROD OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-174-3336547701/07/92 17 01 MIDWEST BSNS PROD OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-249-4236547701/08/92 2 93 MIDWEST BSNS PROD OFF ICE SYPPLIES 01-4210-249-42 01-4232-129-31 01-4232-249-42 01-4232-249-42 01-4324-099-17 01-4324-129-31 72- 4324-549-91 73- 4324-589-92 01-4320-129-31 01-13-92 PAGE 5 • P 0 • MESSAGE ■ ■ •-CKS •••-CKS •**-CKS •••-CKS • • a -CKS •••-CKS i--1991 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE CHECK REGISTER 38S498 365498 365498 365530 365545 365545 365562 365562 365562 365562 365562 365562 365562 365562 365562 365562 365562 365562 365562 365562 365562 365565 365574 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/08/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/W? 01/08/9. 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/08/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/08/92 Cl/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 AMOUNT 150 52 150 52- 10.02 160 54 • 5.000.00 5.000.00 * 119.70 155 54 275 24 • 411 208 2 10 160 100 13 6 222 10 870 8 894 303 58 283 30 26 91 00 31 35 98 99 63 41 53 95 18 98 59 37 • 1.058 10 1.058 10 830 00 830 00 * VENDOR MN CELLULAR TELE MN CELLULAR TELE MN CELLULAR TELE CITY OF MTKA BEACH NAVARRE AUTO REPAIR NAVARRE AUTO REPAIR NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP OFFICE PROD OF MN ITEM DESCRIPTION TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE EMERG SIREN Cf 'RIB CAR WASH REPAIR UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES ST LOTS TYPEWRITTER ACCOUNT NO INV 01-4320-129-31 01-4320-129-31 01-4320-249-42 01-4850-175-34 01-4341-129-31 01-4341-174-33 01-4324 01-4324 01-4324 01-4324 01-4324 01-4324 01-4324 01-4324 72-4324 72-4324 72- 4324 73- 4324 73-4324 73- 4324 74- 4324 099-17 129-31 175-34 175-34 249-42 249-42 290-61 290-61 549-91 549-91 549- 91 569-92 569-92 569-92 550- 33 01-4325-249-42 01-4560-129-31 01-13-92 PAGE 6 8 P 0 8 MESSAGE • n n -CKS •••-CKS •*»-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS 39SSI2 01/07/92 65 26 65 26 • OMAN/LYLE MILEAGE 01-4381-174-33 H • •-CKS 395597 36SS07 01/01/82 01/01/92 4 12 5 18 10 00 PUBlIC EMPL ET ASGN PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA ADOL PERA ADDL 01-4142-069-15 01-4142-129-31 ■••-CKS I f 1991 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO DATE AWUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO IN' 365602 01/07/92 1.318 21 PAPER CAI.MENSON 1 CO PART/PLOW 01-4232-249-42 1,318 21 • 365613 01/07/92 94 00 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR TOW SQUADS 01-4341-129-31 365613 01/07/9?192 40 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR REPAIRS BRONCO 01-4341-185-35 3SS613 01/07/92 1.253 10 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR REPAI RS-TRUCKS 01-4341-249-42 365613 01/07/92 360 05 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR REPAI as TRUCKS 73-4341-569-92 1.899 55 • 365615 01/07/92 12 10 PERRYS VENTURES INC CAR WASH 01-4342-249-42 365615 01/07/92 8 95 PERRYS VENTURES INC CAR WASH 73-4342-569-92 21 05 * 01-13-92 PAGE 7 • P 0 • MESSAGE “•-CKS ft • a -CKS •••-CKS • • • -CKS 365621 01/06/92 874 12 HOPHAM HAIK &ASSOC LEGAL RETAINER-OCT 01-4301-080-16 365626 01/08/92 5.02061 POPHAM HA IK &ASSOC LEGAL PROCECTN OT 01-4302-080-16 365628 01/08/92 24 00 POPHAM HAIK &ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT-OCT 01-4303-040-13 365621 01/06/92 190 20 POPHAM HAIK &ASSOC DNR LAKE ACCESS 01-4303-080-16 365626 01/06/92 518 50 POPHAM HAIK &ASSOC LL ANNEX OCT 0’ 4303-080-16 365626 01/06/92 672 44 POPHAM HAIK &ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT OCT C '^03-080-16 365626 01/06/92 1.015 00 POPHAM HAIK &ASSOC LEGAL HRA FORMATION 0 73-080-16 365626 01/08/92 208 00 POPHAM HAIK &ASSOC LEGAL HRA 0 ‘3-080-16 365626 01/06/92 754 56 POPHAM HAIK ASSOC LEGAL APPLIC OCT 0 03-840-71 365628 01/06/92 207 70 POPHAM HAIK &ASSOC SPRAQUE APPLIC-OCT C . -4303-840-71 365626 01/08/92 24 00 POPHAM HAIK &ASSOC MTKA BEACH-OCT 01-4303-840-71 365628 01/06/92 45 60 POPHAM HAIK A ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT OCT 24-4399-400-00 365626 01/06/92 196 00 POPHAM HAIK &ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT OCT 24-4399-454-00 365626 01/06/92 136 00 POPHAM HAIK &ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT OCT 24-4399-455-00 365626 01/06/92 12 00 POPHAM HAIK A ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT OCT 24-4399-456-00 365626 01/06/92 54 25 POPHAM HAIK 1 ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT OCT 24-4399-457-00 365626 01/06/92 1.328 00 POPHAM HAIK 4.ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT OCT 24 4399-461-00 365626 01/06/92 271 00 POPHAM HAIK &ASSOC CITY HALL land ACQ 2S-4303-480-00 365626 01/06/62 747 00 POPHAM HAIK &ASSOC PROJ CONSTR CONTRACT 25-4303-480-00 365626 01/06/92 2.42226 POPHAM HAIK &ASSOC CONSTR MGR CONTRACT 25-4303-480-00 365626 01/06/92 16 14.737 00 24 • POPHAM HAIK A ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT-OCT 74-4303-590-93 365636 01/07/92 397 40 *"RAIRIE OFF SE T ENVELOPE/LE TTFRHD 01-4322-039-12 365636 01/07/92 397 794 40 80 • PRAIRIE OFFSET ENVELOPE/LETTERHD 01-4322-174-33 365656 01/07/92 9 9 00 00 • R C INDENTIFICATIONS ID 01-4210-129-31 •••-CKS ft ft ft -CKS (V V 1991 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTERCHECK NO . DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV 365669 01/07/92 125.72 RITZ CAMERA FILM DEVELOP 01-4210-129-31 365669 01/07/92 68.49 RITZ CAMERA FILM 01-4210-129-31 365669 01/07/92 17 64 RITZ CAMERA FILM DEVELOP 01-4210-174-33 211.85 • * A Ai • H 365675 01/07/92 3.585 51 ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 01-1260-000-00 3.585.51 • 365693 01/07/92 3.513 50 SCHOENING EXCAVATING SNOW REMOVAL 01-4331-249-42 3.513.50 • 365740 01/07/92 299 60 STREICHERS FLASHLGIS 01-4221-129-31 365740 01/07/92 96 .00 STREICHERS MOUTHPIECES 01-4232-129-31 365740 01/07/92 180 00 STREICHERS AMMO 01-4241-129-31 365740 01/07/92 11 80 STREICHERS REPAIR 01-4342-129-31 587 40 • 365V42 01/08/92 690 37 STRQAR ROSCOE FAUSCH HWY 12 STUDY 01-4306-239-72 690 37 • 365779 01/07/92 246 05 TRACY OIL CO FUEL OIL 74-4220-590-93 246 05 • 365796 01/07/92 1.206 45 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 01-4221-129-31 365796 01/07/92 333 49 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 01-42:1-129-31 1.539 94 • 365791 01/07/92 5.386 46 TWIN CITY TESTING SOIL TEST-FAC SISTE 25-4306-480-00 365791 01/07/92 5.386 45 TWIN CITY TESTING SOIL TEST-FAC SITTE 25-4306-484-00 772 91 • 365115 01/07/92 79 22 US WEST COMMUN TEIEPMONC 01-4320-039-12 365915 01/07/92 79 22 US WEST COMMUN TELEPHONE 01-4320-059-14 365115 . 01/07/92 39 61 US WEST COMMUN TELEPHONE 01-4320-069-15 365115 01/07/92 174 36 US WEST COMMUN .£LEPHONE 01-4320-129-31 365115 01/07/92 79 22 US WEST COMMUN TELEPHONE 01-4320-174-33 01-13-92 PAGE a i •-CHS • • *-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS • • •-CKS •••-CKS -V « 1 1991 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE 36SI1S 365I1S 365115 365S15 365115 365815 365817 365821 365821 365131 365831 365835 365845 365845 365858 365875 365894 365895 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/08/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 01/07/92 AMOUNT 79 29 11 27 78 124 22 62 88 72 57 20 802.84 266 48 266.48 * 3 06 400 09 403 15 • 12.27 12 22 24 49 • 93 00 93 00 • 8 06 45 24 53.30 • 480 15 480.15 • 1.28 8 28 ^ 1.302.87 1.302 87 • 265 89 265 89 • CHECK REGISTERVENDOR US WEST US WEST US WEST US WEST US WEST US WEST COMMON COMMON COMMON COMMON C0W4UN COMMON VESSCO INC VILLAGE CHEVROLET VILLAGE CHEVROLET WALTERS LINDA WALTERS LINDA WARNING LITES OF MN WIJKMAN STEPHEN WE^KMAN STEPHEN W HENN RECYCLING COM WRIGHT HENN ELECTRIC YOCUM OIL CO INC ZIEGLER INC ITEM DESCRIPTION TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE ADV REPAIR VALVE PART REPAIR MILEAGE SWR MTG FLASHERS MILEAGE MILEAGE DEC CITY SHARE 1991 UTILITIES DIESEL PANTS ACCOUNT NO INV 01-4320 01-4320 72- 4320 73- 4320 74- 4320 74-4323 249-42 249-42 549-91 569-92 590-93 590-93 72-4345-549-91 01-4232-249-42 01-4341-290-61 01-4381-069-15 73-4381-569-92 01-4331-249-42 01-4381-174-33 01-4381-174-33 01-4306-295-65 01-4324-249-42 01-4220-249-42 01-4232-249-42 01-13-92 PAGE 9 • P 0 • MES^*.GE •••-CKS -••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS • a •-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS 1991 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO , DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV 38S901 01/07/92 435.00 435.00N ATW LANDSCAPE CLEAN RINKS 01-4331-290-61 365902 01/07/92 869.20 869 .20 CHARLIES BODY SHOP REPAIR BRONCO 01-4341-185-35 365903 365903 01/07/92 01/07/92 162.50 1.0P2.50 1.225.00M CLEARY CONSTRUCTION CLEARY CONSTRUCTION SNOW REMOVAL CHRISTMAS DEC 01-4343-099-17 01-4399-020-11 365904 01/07/92 352 00 352 00 H GATEEWAY SAFETY PD FLARES 01-4232-129-31 365905 365905 01/07/92 01/07/92 47.03 70.56 117.59 ft QAQON PRINTING GAGON PRINTING ENVELOPES ENVELOPES 72- 4322-549-91 73- 4322-569-92 365906 01/07/92 219 60 219 60 • INSTY PRINTS PRINT HS CARDS/ENV 01-4210-059-14 365907 01/07/92 300 00 300.00ft MILLER ENTERPRISES REPAIR 01-4342-249-42 365901 365901 01/07/92 01/07/92 315.00 35.00 350.00ft MN POLLUTION CONTROL MN POLLUTION CONTROL CLASS CLASS 73-4356-569-92 73-4356-569-92 365909 01/07/92 100 00 100.00 ft BUREAU CRIMINAL CLASS 01-4356-129-31 365910 01/07/92 118.00 118.00 ft NORTHLAND BUSINESS TAXES 01-4210-129-31 385911 01/07/92 2,400.00 2,400 00 ft NORTHWEST MECHANICAL LS ill FINAL 73-4531-569-92 365912 365912 01/07/92 01/07/92 98.00 49.00 147.00ft CAREERTRACK CAREERTRACK SEMINAR SEMINAR 01-4356-129-31 01-4356-129-31 365913 385913 01/07/92 01/07/92 5 51 8.27 13.78 ft GREGORY/JIM GREGORY/JIM MILEAGE MILEAGE 72- 4381-549-91 73- 4381-569-92 305914 01/07/92 33.15 33.15 ft HUDSON MAP CO HAPS 01-4210-129-31 365915 01/07/92 127.95 127.95 ft QOMAN/DAVID UNIFORMS/GOHAN 01-4221-185-35 365910 01/07/92 351 95 351.95 ft SHAMROCK IND BINS 01-4232-295-65 365917 01/07/92 20 00 SWENSON ELECTRONICS REPAIR RECORDER 01-4340-039-12 01-13-92 PAGE f . 1991 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO . DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV 20.00 • 365920 01/08/92 1,251.35 1.251 35 k COMMONWEALTH TIL LAND TITLE INS/FEES 25-4510-480-00 365921 01/08/92 5,500 00 5,500 00 • MOOOYS INVESTOR SERC BOND RATING FEE 25-4306-480-00 365922 01/08/92 188 79 188.79 SCHERER FARMS REIM FOR CROP DAMAGE 25-4399-486-00 365923 01/01/92 3,731 08 3,731.08 • BARR ENGINEERING CO LAKES HIGH WTR STUDY 01-4306-299-72 365925 01/07/92 75 00 75.00 k CITY OF EDINA WATER TESTING 72-4306-549-91 365930 365930 01/07/92 01/07/92 1 00 7.00 8.00 k MH DEPT OF REVENUE MN DEPT OF REVENUE DEC SALES RX DEC SALES RX 01-3500-000-00 01-3516-000-00 365939 365939 365939 01/08/92 01/08/92 01/08/92 4,167.84 1 .673.42 33,056 61 38,897 87 k BAD UNDERGROUND B & D UNDERGROUND BAD UNDERGROUND TH12 FRONTAGE STS83 TH12 FRONTAGE WTR83 TH12 FRONTAGE STI3 24-4531-426-00 24- 4531-426-00 25- 4532-486-00 01-13-92 PAGE ( •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS • a •-CKS •••-CKS 68,104.21 FUND 01 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 477 76 FUND 12 TOTAL PARK FUND 1,754 49 FUND 23 TOTAL MUNIC STATE AID CONS FUN 11,719 78 FUND 24 TOTAL PERM IMPROVE REVOLVING F 85,334.78 FUND 25 TOTAL 770.00 FUND 45 TOTAL 1985 IMP BOND D/S FUND 2.243 47 FUND 72 TOTAL WATER OPERATING FUND 6,746 16 FUND 73 TOTAL SEWER OPERATING FUND 572.68 FUND 74 TOTAL GOLF COURSE OPERATING FD 177.723 33 TOTAL _ _ _ _ GEMUNIS FINANCIAL SYSTEM 01/08/92 PAGEACCOUNTING USER 00 1991 CITY OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF LEVEL LEVEL LEVEL LEVEL LEVEL LEVEL LEVEL LEVEL LEVEL LEVEL TOTAL REPORT ORONO REPORTS UPDATES RECORDS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 82 0 1.075 0 0 0 34 0 0 1 0 2 1.114 UPDATE DESCRIPTIONS 0 SUMMARY FILE 0 PAYROLL A BENEFIT ACCRUAL ACTIVITY REPORT 0 CHECK REGISTER 3 TRIAL BALANCE 0 BALANCE SHEET 0 REVENUE STATEMENT 0 OPERATING STATEMENT 0 BUDGET WORKSHEETS 0 CLEAR-CURR-MONTH 0 CITY FILE OPTION 0 PROJECT DEPARTMENT X CHART OF ACCOUNTS MO CHECK RECONCILE 0 YEAR TO DATE PERIOD 11 BUDGET RECORDS CREATED FINANCIAL REPORTS SCHEDULED RUN DATE REPORT DATE '■ ACTIVITY REPORTS SCHEDULED RUN DATE REPORT DATE 000000 000000 010892 011392 PAYROLL POSTING DATES 000000 000000 000000 000000 . ) r fi!/ -^4 Z/'-) 'i'W'a tf^<d g '4 I tJj hj]/f% «'tu .1.^r\ ^.i^i COUNCIL MEETING JAN 13 1992 CITY OF ORONO rv ft r- [,' iv^ I'. 1. Efei LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DI5TRI(^[ water structures & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE AGENDA ■' r - < 7:30 AM Saturday, January 11. 1992 Norwest Bank Bldg, 900 E Wayzata Blvd, Rm (Elevator access for handicapped, use west entrance. Wayzata Blvd) JAM 135 o 1992 environment Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force. Chair Reese A. Report of 12/20/91 Task Force meeting recommendations; (minutes enclosed) B. Status of legislative bill on access controls for c.xotic plant and aniaal containment being prepared by .MN Lake Mgmt Federation,* C. Proposed bill authorizi.ig Hennepin County expenditures to control and eradicate Eurasian water milfoil, recommending broadening to all aquatic exotic plans and animals, per Senator Traub initiative; D. Hennepin Parks proposal to establish a water sampling laboratory for inter-agency service on a pay-as-used basis, with start-up funds from LCMR; E. Additional business recommended by the committee: HATER STRUCTURES 1.Rockvam request of 12/26/91, for policy review to consider an amendment to Site 2 dock length variance; 2.North Shore Drive Marina, non-compliance with license requirement to designate transient and service slips, staff recommendation to begin license revocation; 3. 4. Parris' appeal to Nagel Variance Order, attorney’s report; Expiration of Ordinance 106, Interim Ordinance Restricting the Licensing, Construction and Maintenance of New Commercial and Multiple docks; expiration date 1/31/92. 5.Review of Policies and Procedures Subcommittee recommendations, and additional staff recommendations: 6.Deicing applications: A« Renewal application: Reid & Virginia McDonald, Lafayette Bay B. New applications; 1) Diane E. Benson, 1080 Wildhurst Trail, Mound, Forest Lake 2) Leno Mikenas. 5195 Greenwood Circle, Greenwood, St. Albans Bay C. Deposit Refund $100; Doug Waldoch, West Arm (removed boat and decided not to deice) 1: :^ ; . Water Structure & Environment Commi'lce AucnJo, 1 11 O'*A A . y nm ? .1 go 2 i. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT January 2, 1992 To: Water Structures Comnittee ... .. : 'From: Rachel Thitault a . Subj.: North Shore Drive Marina non-compliance with license requirement to designate transient and service slips - . ..t : f:- ., •i* v'^.- J>. V »»,• ' xrjf. -»f The 7/9/91 sunaary of the North Shore Drve Marina multiple dock license between 1984, when a new license was grai ted, and the approval of the 1991 renewal application, is enclosed. North Shore Drive Marina's 1991 ■ultiple dock license was granted subject to their designation of 6 transient slips and 6 service slips. aw *■Xhe following is a suamary of subsequent phone conversations and LMCD corroapondonce to Deborah Breneman, business manager of North Shore Drive Marina. 9/10/91 Phone conversation between Ms. Breneman and administrative technician stressing need to designate transient and service slips as license requirement! Breneman advised she was having their former attorney’s records checked for documents. 9/12/91 Certified letter was mailed to Breneman confirming •dainistrative technician's conversation, repeating necessity of and service slip designation on site plan. Information . ^ requested by ,9/23/91. *' • » 4 < » € m 9/13/91 Breneman called the executive director about an agreement between the former executive director and Larry Hork, owner of North Shore Drive Marina, which stated it was not necessary to designate the oorvice and transient slips• Research indicated no such agreement. A "^7/26/85 letter to Brucn Bougies, attorney for North Shore Drive Marina, .^nn^i^w-^ndvised that the survey submitted was lacking slip designation as to t-tranaiant and service slips. >44- 9/23/91 A certified letter was mailed to Breneman with a copy of the « ■trr t 7/26/85 latter,'again pointing out the need to identify the 6 transient'v- .?V 'SC*.'* ^ i.; L*>: ■ and 6 service slips. Also, it was pointed out that inspection indicated that the ntimber of overnight storage slips had increased from 81 to 91. «A daadlina of 10/3/91 was given for receipt of the requested information ’v‘V*'S*'**'*' 'A*'*" " ■ 10/22/91 Breneman called the executive director, apologizing for non- P^gponaa to lattcrs. She stated they were checking with their attorney :.and Mr. Hork. .who had been ill. to get the business records. » * : 10/31/91" In response to a call from Breneman that she had received no “iA* r. .. site plan with her renewal application, a copy of the site plan on file was sent with a note reminding of the need for the slip designation with the renewal application. i r 4: ft i^' I ■,v ” J-. 'c n %t ^■‘9- r^>‘ t* 'li >*>•;'-> J I MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DIS File Memo/R. Thibault 7/9/91 In 19d4, North Shore Drive was issued a new dock license to rebuild their docks in agreement to a settlement requiring reconstruction of the docks within 200'. The license was for 76 storage slips, 6 service slips, 6 transient and 20 rack storage for a total of 108 Water Availability Units (WAU). The license was issued subject to an as-built survey. In 1985, an as'^built survey was submitted, but it was not complete per letter of 7/26/85. In 1986, the license renewal showed an increase from 76 storage to 81, for a total of 113 WAU. In January 9, 1986, North Shore Drive Marina was informed that a special density application fould be required as well as an acceptable as- built. October 22, 1986, the dock application was denied due to lack of the es-built survey. The survey was received 11/25/86, with the 1987 renewal application for 81 rental, 6 transient. 6 service and 20 rack, a total of 113 WAU. The transient and aarvice slips were not designated on the site plan. The dock application was approved 4/22/87 with 113 WAU. (no record of a special density application was found) In 1988, dock license renewal application was for 81 rental. 6 transient, 6 service and 20 rack. The rack storage was later amended to 72, as approved 3/23/88. In 1989 end 1990, the renewal applications were received as 85 rental and 8 service and 72 rack. With the 1991 renewal application, our inspection revealed that the slip designation had changed from the license fanewel applications submitted 1984—1988, and that the site plan did not indicate which slips were for transient and jjs. Breneman, current operator of North Shore Drive Marina, was contacted frequently during the spring of 1991 to identify these 12 slips. In May, the license was approved contingent on slip designation. further repeated phone conversations clarifying the paquirements of designating the 6 transient and 6 service slips, on Juno 26, Ms. Breneman requested approval to designate 4 lagoon slips, 2 as service. 2 as transient and the 4 slips next to the main walkway as transient (Al, Bl, Cl, & Dl), with 4 rack storage spaces as service slips. Ms. Breneman was advised that the rack storage could not be included as part of the transient/service storage designation. F" is: hIy, I f' i-y 1-2-92 Is, Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 473-7033 L.M.C.D. MEETING SCHEDULE January 1992 Saturday 11 Water Structures & Environment Committee 7:30 am, #135 Norwest Bank Building, Wayzata Monday 13 Lake Use Committee 4:30 am, #135 Norwest Bank Building, Wayzata Thursday 16 DNR Access on Maxwell Bay Proposal 9:00 am, #135 Norwest Bank Building, Wayzata Friday 17 Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force 8:30 am, #135 Norwest Bank Building, Wayzata Monday 20 Martin Luther King Holiday, LMCD office closed Tuesday 21 LMCD Ethics Committee 8:00 am, LMCD office, Norwest Bank Bldg, Wayzata Wednesday 22 LMCD Board of Directors’ Regular Meeting 7:30 pm. Tonka Bay City Hall (?■ LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 473-7033 EVENTS SCHEDULE January 1992 .V^ • I ■* ‘ ‘ J Thursday thru Saturday 23, 24, 25 8:00 am to 4:30 pm daily Friday start 9:00 am Saturday Feb 1 finish 9:00 pm *4. .r- 1' ,r ■^v r> I'-’ t r .# 4 .. .s -4. • I 1-2-92 ■fii , S'?ir 9/ir t:" a' •»• ■.* v« I* Jvm . -Vi^ ^ . t- •■9 (. > I • ^•>.w Ehlert Publlshiag Group, Inc.'s Superbowl media and corporate groups Uintertainment, Lafayette Club and Lafayette Bay Westonka Snoblazers Arnle Zachman Fun Run A1 6t Alma's, Cooks Bay Mack's Bar, Jeton Lake Mis: Spring Park Bay Haskells Bar, Excelsior Bay Excelsior Park Tavern, Excelsior Bay Club Mirabelli, Excelsior Bay i- tS'- .'A V- •i:v p. Ip W X T I A. B. C • D. B. F. G. • • k. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT rr-Y A I LAKE USE COMMITTEE ■) . . . -=>j c -L-i' AGENDA Monday, January 13, 1992, 4:30 PM JAN 9 1992 Norwest Bank Building 900 E. Wayzaca Blvd. Room 135 (Elevator access for Handicap^?J: use west entrance on Wayzata Blvd.) a Review of Public Hearing Report and Resolution regarding application fees for wine and non-intoxicating beer licenses, superseding Resolution <^54: Special Events 1. New Applications: a) Vestonka Snoblazets "Fun Run". Frida/ and Saturday, 1/31/92 and 2/1/92, snowmobile course between bars near the lake. b) Ehlert Publishing Group, Inc.,"Wintertainment", Thursday - Saturday, January 23,24 & 25, 1992, Superbowl media and corporate group winter recreation event. 2. Renewal Application: •) Wayzata Chamber of Commerce Chilly Open Golf & Ice Fishing Tournament, Sat S Sun, 2/8/92 & 2/9/92 3. Deicing Refunds 9$100 each: a) Consolidated Race Schedule 1991 season b) Upper Minnetonka Yacht Club 1991 season Save The Lake Recognition Dinner - recommendation for Water Patrol award recipient: program discussion; Subcommittee to study signs at accesses on Lake Hinnetonke; Consideration to make a donation to the Minnehaha SZrc^tesr Boat Restoration, additional submittals. Update on DNR‘s proposed change in size of snowmobile registration numbers; "Save the Lake" contribution to the Water Patrol for safety equipment. Chair Pillsbury report: H. Water Patrol Report: I, Additional Business recommended by the Committee; r r. I- Ir 1.r' I r I- r.’- Memorandum JAN 3 1992 To: le: Re: TH 12 Policy, Technical, and Citizen’s Committees Steve Hay January 2, 1992 January Committee Meetings To allow far** of the committees adequate review time of the draft scoping document, we have rescheduled the January committee meetings as follows: Felky Committee: 5:30 p.m., January 22, 1992 (Orono Schools Education Unk Building) Technical Committee: 1:00 p.m,, January 28, 1992 (Delano City Hall) Citizen's Committee: 4:00 p.m., January 28, 1992 (Maple Plain City Hall) TTic Policy Committee meeting will be one week later than usual, and the Technical and Citizen's Committee meetings wiU be held at their regularly scheduled times You will receive an agenda, previous meeting minutes, and a draft review copy of the scoping document about a week before the meetings. Please excuse die inconvenience of this rescheduling. mmw ^ w — -----------— Independence %Long Lake 1 Maple Plain Medina Orono Wayzata Fraiiklin Township immm9 mmOrnmr N' ? ' . *• • •• #. V. -;V - i %' irC % u i-r. I ■P: ‘fr.-;. I I. fr !*’’■ t- &■ nVrONBA LAKCSHORE OWNERS AwocuTiow. me. r.O. BOXIM. nCSLSlOR. MNSSSSI k |F‘^. tk January 5, 1992 j ^990 City Council Orono PO Box 66Crystal Bay, NN 55323 Dmt Cenmunity service Organization: The planning has begun for the 3rd Annual Conunity Earth Day OalSBrati<__ _ _ _ _ _ _to be held on Wednesday, April 22, 1992 from 3:00-9:00 p.n. The Lafayette Club has agreed to donate their facility for the event. nemnerw of the scientific, business and civic communities with environaental concerns and solutions will again be the focus of this ymar's event. We invite your participation and support. Tables will M available for vendors and displays in the ballroom. The Boon will be used for speakers and discussion. Fireside We will look forward to seeing a representative from your organization at the first planning session to network for this very popular and growing event of the 90's. Mark your calendar for this important meeting to be held at Lord :cn< ‘ ‘ “ ^ ^Fletcher's in The Beanery at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 14, 1992 Earth Day Exeij^ment, Kathv PviKathy Fyatt, .rane Chiesl WOT More XnfazBatian Call: 472—1505 or 472—3095 r•V' We are pleased to announce the formation of ‘{» 1. fP. f'*-: ?■ The Brimeyer Group, inc. EXECUTIVE SEARCH CONSULTANTS The Brimeyer Group incorporated in 1991 will be primarily devoted to executive search services and will provide consulting in the areas of strategic planning and team building. The principal of the firm, Jim Brimeyer, has over 20 years experience in public sector management and has provided executive search consulting ser\ ices since July, 1988. Jim began his career in 1968 as Assistant City Manager in Park Ridge, Illinois and has served as City Manager in WooddaJe, Illinois; Worthington, Ohio; and St. Louis Park, Minnesota (1980 to 1988). Since becoming involved in executive search consulting, Jim has completed over 50 assignments, w'ith three-fourths being public sector, non-profit/association assignments and one-fourth in private sector assignments. Exp«rtonc«: (Partial List of Assignments) Public Sector City Manager/City Administrators; RowviUe, MN Bemidji, MN New Brighton. MN Cottage Grove, MN Brooklyn Park, MN Austin, MN Orono, MN Hemtantown, MN Minneapolis, ,MN South St. Paul, MN Hazel Crest, IL St. James, MN Key Staff Positions Coordiitator of Utilities - Luveme. MN Fiitanoe Director • Cottage Grove, MN Finance Director • Minneapolis, MN Fire Chief - Centennial Fire District Police Chief • Orono, MN PubUc Works Supervisor - Proctor, MN Community Development Director • Lakeville. MN Edueslion * B.A. • Loras College, Dubuque, Iowa * M.A.-PublicAdmmisiration,Northern nUttois University, DeKalb * Adjunct Faculty Member • Hamline Univervity Graduate School of PuUic Administration Please Sto* ^ for a visit. Private Sector COO • sporting gfxxis manufacturer Senior Aca^unt Nlanager - government leasing corpi>ration Director. Sales and Marketing - optical lens company Prtxiuction Manager - optical lens company Public Afta:rs Attorney - Twin Cities livv firm Senior Design Engineer and Production Manager - sign manufacturing company Transportaticfi Engineer - engineenng consulting firm Non-Protit/Associations Executive Director - LOGIS Manager ot Light Rail Transit - Regional Transit Board Executive Director - MN State Council on Disability_ _ _ ^ Executive Director • Cold Weather Resource Center Executu • Director - North Suburban Cable Commission Executive Director - Ramsey Washington Cable Commission Executive Director - Minnesota Chiefs of Police Association Consulting (Strstsgic Planning ATsam Building) Corporate Public Relations Dept. - 3M City ot Crv'stal City ot Hopkins City ot White Bear Lake Citv ot Golden Valiev Steams County City of Brooklyn Center City ot Aiden Hills Engineering Consulting Firm Brimever Community/Professional Affiliations * Put Ftaidcnt-St Louis Park Rotary * Picsidcnt - St Louis PXrk Rotary Foundation * Twin Winl Chamber of Commerce * Member • International Qty Management Association * Member - Minnesota Qty Management Association * Member-Minnesota Municipal Utilities Assonation * Member • National Forum for Black Public Administrators * Member - Solid Waste Association of North America * Serves as Boardmember/Owner of two other Minnesota- iTie Brimeyer Group, inc. EXECUTIVE SEARCH CONSULTANTS James Brimeyer • President One Tenth Ave South Hopkins. Mn. 55343 (612)945-0246 h. (612) 929-7399 fax (612) 933-1153 ZA r •: *•. Welcome to The Minnesota Association of Community Mediation Programs ___ he Minnesota As- > I * sociation of Com- I munity Meditation I Programs, which is made up of Dis­ pute Resolution Center. Mediation Services for Anoka County, Minneapolis Mediation Program, North Hennepin Mediation Project and the West Suburban Media ­ tion Center, strive to actively promote a better understand ­ ing and iiKreased use of me­ diation, conciliation, education and referral services in the seven-county metro area. Such services are provided to indi­ viduals. organizations, and businesses that wish to resolve disputes through peaceful com­ munication with others. The programs provide an alterna ­ tive to traditional institutions and processes which may be cost-prohibitive or may seem intimidating to parties in con­ flict Commonly referred dis- 0 pules include neighbor to neighbor conflicts, business- consumer disputes, landlord tenant issues, city-resident problems, and juvenile of ­ fenses. In all of these situa- uons. the parties and the com - munity-at-large benefit from the resolution . rather than the avoidaiKC of the problem. The services of the Associauon's member pro ­ grams allow parties tn con­ flict to share concerns in a supportive yet neutral envi­ ronment providing an ap­ pealing alternative to those parties that may shy away from the court system. Me­ diation services are also ap­ propriate in cases that may not be as drastic to require court intervention but do present real conflicts for ihc people involved. Services are accessible and confidential, provided at Contact Information Dispute Resolution Center (East Metro)....292-7711 Mediation Services for Anoka County ......755-5300 Minneapolis Mediation Program..............871 -0639 North Hennepin Mediation Project ...........561-(X)33 West Suburban Mediation Center............933-(X)05 ciihcr no or minima] cost to program panici* pants-thoughno party is denied service because of inability to pay. Mediation IS a crucial op ­ tion for those in- dividuais who may avoid re­ solving prob ­ lems because of the fear of lengthy and expensive legal proceedings. The Association ’s mem­ ber programs strive to pro ­ vide quality mediation ser­ vices by ofTenng extensive educauon and training to our mediators. The Association has developed a comprehen- sivc in-scrvicc training pro ­ gram for 1991 that provides monthly workshops on a wide variety of topics, Ad- diuonally, the Association has conducted numerous workshops to groups arxl or ­ ganizations to promote the bcnefiis of mediation and conflict resolution skills. If you would like more information on community mediauon please call the office nearest vou. On the Inside Sr.A rii Funding C ommunity Prik.rams Euoibli -: To Mi diatt - I Post- Dissolution Issui I i 1 A sk Tin: Mldiator Why Mi diait ; ............. J PROtiRAM Noti:s ............ i ■ N kwTrainii :s ................ I A, r a. 'V t 9 91 I DimECTORS Bonnie Lukes President Kathy Dryke Vice-President Jim Levin Treasurer Ann Wallerstedt Secretary Sue Nelson At-Large Newsletter Staff Bob Epstein John Hennebeiry Jean McKenzie Johnson Gary Moc Judy Newell Greg Backlund Doris Runa Community Program Eligible to Mediate Post- Dissolution Issues Beginning JuJy 1, 1991. Min- nesoia Statute 494.03 was amended to allow community mediation programs to medi­ ate disputes involving post-dis- solution property disiribuuon and post-dissolution visitation matters. Before then, the com­ munity programs were re­ stricted from partKipating in such mediabons. Responding to a request from one community media­ tion program. Senator Luther and Representab VC Carruihers, respectively, included this statutory change in Senate File 969 and House File 1 142. The legislation directs the State Court Administrator to issue guidelines that set forth train­ ing requirements before a vol­ unteer community mediator is eligible to mediate in a post­ dissolution property distribu­ tion and post-dissolution visi­ tation matter. EligibiUty re­ quires 40 houn of coun-ceru- fied training in family law mat- State Funding For Community Programs In the closing days of the past legislabve session the Mitmesoia House and Senate adopted legislation which, in part, t'^vides $200,000 in funding for siate-cerbncd community mediation programs over the next two years. House File 1631, the ma- Ask The Mediator Is it better to use a round or rectangle table during a mediation? What do I do if a party to a media­ tion Stans to erv? Is a written mediated agree­ ment a binding contract? In mediation, like most anything, there is no “right” answer. How ­ ever, we hope this col ­ umn space will provide thoughtful responses to questions you may have about the mediation pro ­ cess. If you have a ques ­ tion for ASK THE ME­ DIATOR, jot it down on a postcard and send it to ASKTHE MEDIATOR, %MMP 2429 Nicollet Avenue South, Minne ­ apolis. Minnesota 55404 We will try to answer it in the next is­ sue of the COMMU­ NITY MEDIATOR. jar appropriaiion bill allocat­ ing funding for state agencies, included this money in the funding it appropriated to the State Court Adminisuator's Office. The money will be available beginning in August. 1991. The community Mediauon Pro­ grams received a similar grant from the Legislature in 1990 but the ouUook for future fund- mg looked bleak given the bght finarKial restraints facing the Stale of Minnesota. However Minnesota legislators realized (hat funding the community mediauon programs is a wise long-term invesonent as the programs can reduce court case loads and provide valuable cost-saving services to the cit­ ies and counties of Minnesota. Special thanks should go to Representauve Simoneau. Represeniauve Kahn, Senator Memam and their staffs for their efforts m helping this legisladon pass. Mediation Services for Anoka County MSAC commends volunteer mediators who provided over 2 2S3 hours of services in 1990. Commissioner Dan Erhart. Chairman of the Anoka County Board; Mike Auspos. Ramsey Chief of Police; and Coon Rap­ ids Mayor Richard Reiter were among those who brought rec- ogniuon to MSAC's dedicated volunteers. •, I A T O Minneapolis Mediation Program Like the other community programs, MMP is also expenencing a record number of cases for 1991. Kathy Dryke. the Execubve Director of MMP conihbuies the expanded caseload to “an increase in the number of landlord-tenant cases that have been diverted bom court” and to a nse in the number of community problems that have been referred from the Mmncapolis Police Depart­ ment and the SAFE unit L V ■' ■ m^:: . M A I I mGmfMom Wly Bcdial* — because it’s quick, confidential, voluntary, inexpensive, (air. efTective. em- ponxfini and future oriented. M I I 'i I I Mcdlalioa b qukk. Mostme- liiy disputes are resolved in a — usually in a couple of horn of bearing tinie. takes place in private. Theieis BO pdMic focoird: and all con- iraoui. Moreovcr.nei- ’pastkanor mediaion can be caOedloieariiyiBOOttrtorelae- wkere about the process of the diariao begins only when both (ail) panics agree to mediate. Moreover, any party can back out at any point in the process. Mediation is inexpensive. Community mediation is free or provided at low cost Medialioa is fair. The parties decide the outcome - based on their own standards and defini­ tion of fairness. If they don't agree, they don’t settle. Medialioa is efTective. Over 80 percent of mediated com­ munity disputes reach setile- menL One study in Maine showed that the “winners ” in mediated cases were more than twice as likely (71 percent) to be pud as the “women" incases heard in small claims court (34 percent). The apparent reason for this difference is that in mediation both parties have their say and both agree to the seulemenL Mcdlnlioo is future orieuted. Its purpose is solving problems, not looking buck to assess guilt or assign blame. THE MINNESOTA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY MEDUTION PROGRAMS HAS 221 VOLUNTEERS! • provMdwidlfaGtltfaloruintorMolvudlapuias Nana • train communNy madialora »protrida workahopa on conflict raaohition akiUto titantdara of tha community Addraaa City.Stata. Zip Coda. • Infhianca publie poicy AN of tMo lo dona with your halp. Endoood ploooo find a conirltNitlon in tha amount off________ Ctiacfca ahouW ba mada payabla to: MintwapoUs Madlallon Prognm 2429 Hteottai Avanua So. H/Unnaapotfs, MN. 5i Your Contribution la tax-daductibla Thank You. _____________ New IVainies The Miftnesou Association of Community Mediation Programs omtifics that the following indi- vMiials itKccatfully completed nedialion naming and thanks diem for their participotjon and oommuniiy service. AllphaAdkms Ahman Joel Axcison CarieBloadel Gary Coi MmEitel Linda Eaaniher M—imOiddings CoBaan Graham PaalHUe RofvJahn Lori KeBey TeByKiafloa Margral LcBien MaryUCh^^Ue Nancy Lmditrooi lamaaLynn Rohan Martin EariMoOovcm BjBMclUbhin WibnaMcKinnies Gary Moa FradOwusu AntoRafahol Mary Schmidt Bomna Miritowiec-Smith HmltM Lamia Uuon Steve Wagner JudyWoalIncr Oii^ Zarinelli EdZoerb Eika Hokana AactU Padine Bouchard Carol Cmkhiel Mailyn Doyle PmlOla em Chfinina Johnson Charly Kanes Dins McKenzie Rep. Sally Obcn AaoMlack Janet Sitefe Amis Swanairom Jim Tamos Jndce Watson Cknn Werner lom Wheeler North Hennepin Mediation Project tion made poor to the court session has been well received and gives us the opportunity to offer mediation over other methods of dispute resoluuon Dispute Resolution Center The North Hennepin Me­ diation Project is having one of its busiest years in history due to increased refeml sources. Another factor that has aided in a larger case load is the fact that satisfied participants of prior mediMion sessions are us­ ing the process to resolve new or different problems. The Matkciiiig Commit­ tee has been meeting legualrly and are plaiuiing many pro- grans in the coming months. They hope 10 see an increase in business mediatian as a result of Ihetr efforts and activities. Committee members have worked at booths a the Sl Paul Civic Center and a the Minne- sou League of Munietpalibes Trade Show to aiswer ques­ tions abou mediation. At the annual apprec iabon SO volunteers were honored for their commitment to commu­ nity service. Eniertainmentwas provided by the Land of Lakes Choir Boys directed by Board member SgL Craig Anderson. Conciliation Court continues to add signigicanily to our caseload. The oral presenu- 1990 Challenges & Growth for West Suburban Mediation Center In late 1989. our County fjnding was cut. A major downsize was needed. Staff ­ ing was cuL office space re­ duced. a phone line discontin­ ued, spending held to a mini­ mum. Appeals went out to the ciUcs we serve for assistance while we continued to worit with the County for reinstate ­ ment of funds. The endeavors pro ved sue- cessfui. County funds were approx d for 1990 and 1991. Also, we became eligible for an appropriation from the S tate of Minnesota. A new pilot program was started with Henneptn County Housing Court Two media- lois from our program are avail ­ able in ihe courtroom one morn­ ing each week. During the past 18 months, the Dispute Resolution Center {DRO opened cases at a record pace. In 1990. DRC opened 25% more cases than any pre­ vious year during its 8 year history. Earlier this year. DRC was one of 3 programs nation ­ wide to receive A ARP funding for a pilot Senior Ciuzen me­ diation project In the initial phases of this project DRC is woildng with residents and staff from 11 area senior oriented housing complexes (owned or managed by the Pub­ lic Housing Authority. Wilder Foundation or Westminister Corp.) to promote mediation. Mediation irainingwill be pro­ vided for seniors citizens re- cniited through this project. •program ?{ptes: Our iu3(t isstu u/idfeature Medtation Sennets of‘\nokg County and tfu MinneapoRs ^Mediation Program. JAU 3MB ^ESOTA ASSbCIATI OF WEST SUEUPRAN 1:::EDI A ' * - '* J JL.« i i *' ► * .T 'T * ^ 7 r -r. - i I Ave Sc2429 Mpii (61^071-0639 Admass Correcion Requested Mayor & City Council City of Orono Bex 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 ■.-y-'l.f'v> t k-<■i - ’ v: ^i. [&. L'*: i.Mm General Informatioii Vm 1Wc«afcraK« fee iiS7S Md iKladet tuitioo, malcrMh. cominaiul breakfasi. luncheon, and IfWks. He **a|NMiM ” fee «f S2S iDcludes all the above cxcqit materials. Ike ceafer eaca it befet beld ai fee Akpoit Hilton Hotel. 3 200 E. 80th St. H loummgton (esil fe34dl Awe. from 494; go tomb oo 34th to lOth St ). fer Friday. Febniary 1.199 1 at a special reduced me orSSI amgle or double. TInm le^Mng accommodationt should complete the enclosed fem aad mai diwcity la fea Airport Hilton Hotel. For mullipkrcgistralioDs. Just duplicate the fem. Advaaee lagiaMiiaat aia daa by Friday, Jamtvy 31. Fat legittaiioa aaaMMeacaB Cfehy Dovidio, LMC, at (612) 227-5600. For program call VMaBHafl,0TSal(dl2) 222-7409 or Mtnnesou ToU Free 800/652-9719. ■maacaivaMlieaaf bMcai la caaoel yoee partkipatioo seven days prior to the pfagnakStfeaUmUtm fee legislcradparlicipaBls is possible. Should iaclement weather (« ofe« daares beyond our coo»ol) necessitate program cancellation or postpone- meal, partkipanu will be aodliad via aanouaccnscats on WCCO radio and other local Special (fete: htooftntlmwftkAtUtpmefklUmtapUt CiUtt, GovtnmtM TraMngSmlceand ITaman in Oty Cmemmcnr arepr«s»artagpr»<m|frrmce workshops on Friday. February f. t992. SttatpmrnhvckmatoehMwiikilUBmaairffitrdetails. LMCtafeanOdal af cMea aerving the needs and best interests of the stale's cMaa walking together to promote fegislation on behairof leal ga va wmil and fiev Uti infeimattoo and other resources to assist city ofTicials in Itiit a ga rtiln irngtstta fea ftmilly of service ddlvcry to Minnesota citizens. • a L GTS ia a pnbifemganinlian whaae mission is to meet fee changing roanagemeoi and feadanWp aaods of paUcymakma, mail; and appointed ofikials by providing innovative, f nmprilta ndva. practical paining, and cananiting to publicly fuaded organizations in services for this conrerence. k''. >. . - -- , lEIE League of Minnesota Cities 1992 Conference for 183 University Ave. E St. Paul. MN S510I (612)227-5600 Fax 221-0986 Newly Elected Officials Saturday, February 8, 1992 Airport Hilton Hotel, Bloomington Now that the elections are over, it’s time to befin your new role as a city offictal and meet the challenge of governing your city. Recognizing the tough job and serious responsi* bilities that lie ahead, the League of Minnesota Cities is offering a one-day Conference for Newly Elected OfTicialt to ease the transition. Who Should Attend The conference is primarily for newly elected mayors and councilmembers, however, any incumbent elected official oi appointed employee will find it to be a valuable **reftesher** course. In response to numerous requests, we have initialed a special “spouse” registration. f ■jM mfe- .p:•ils'm 7:15 »M. t:lS «j«. t:49i«a. 9:5$ 1411. M:49 t4i Proeram 7:15 aji. lUglitralloB CMliMBlal BreakitM M m C tlM LcagM of Mlaaffoia Cities and other local fOveniaiMt organlialloM on a one-to-one basis with key staff membets on an infonnal basis. Refreshments will be available. WdcoMe and IntrodnctioBS Donald Slater, Executive Director, LMC CatMNfla: What They Can and Cannot Do Desyl PetenoH, City Attorney, Minnetonka 9:49 aji. Refreahnicnt Break Personal LlabllHy and Conflict of Interest George Hoff, Attorney, HofTA Allen Open Mectinf Law and Data Practices Act Ttmotky Kantz, Attorney, UVander. Gillen. Miller. AndomftKuntz 11:59 ajB. Lnndieon ■ I rw - 1 • ^ ■ Afternoon Sessions Governing Your City - Getting a Good Start (Participants attend three sessions on budgeting and rmance, planning, an personnel and labor relations designed speciflcally for their size city.) 1:10 p.m. 2:15 p.m. 3:30 p.m. Budgeting and Finance • Under 2,5(X): Tom Thelen. Field Representative, LMC • 2,500-4,999: Steve Perkins, City Administrator, l| Luveme 1 • Over S,(KX): Jim Miller, City Manager, Minnetonka ’ Planning • Under 2,500: Robert Lac year. Director of Planning and Public Affairs, Wa& ington County • 2,500-4,999: Barliara Dacy, Community Devdq|Miient Director, Frid’ ^y • Over 5,000: Duane Zaun, Mayor, Lakeville 3:15 p.m. Refreshment Break Personr A and’ Labor Relations • Under 5,000: Shannon McCambrldge, Associate, Larkin. Hoffliian. Jaly Llndg.en, Attorneys it Law • Over 5.30J: .*!orAs tanning. Mayor, Moothead 4:30 p.m. Adjournment ,r 1 ■n nr OV 5' 1?^ :l i 11» liitifi •!• ■ J f I » I b • I i » League of Minnesota Cities 1992 Conference for 183 University Ave. E. St. Paul. MN 55101 (612) 227-5600 Fax 221-0986 Newly Elected Officials Saturday, February 8, 1992 Airport Hilton Hotel, Bloomington irnt«i ^ ^Cwt a»d fturn to Atfppn MtHpn Noit ^ Coafcrcncc for Newly Elected Officials February 8, 1998 Alrpart Hilton Hotel, Bloomington Advance Registration (Deadline January 91) ICien I Conuct Person: i T*’ phone# I A.C. I Name ! TtUeI I I Addreu I I I Qty, State. Zip Code I I I Spouse I Registration: City officialsI I I before JamiafT 15 City officials after January 15 Spouse $75 □ $85 □ $25 □ MAIE CHECKS PAYABLE TO AND MAIL THIS PORTION TO: League of Miuuosota Cities 189 Uuiversity Aveuue East St. Paul, MN 55101 I:. Housing Reservation Form League of Minnesota Cities Conference for Newly Elected Officials February 8, 1992 (Reservation cut-off deadline January 24, 1992) Name Representing Address City State Zip /,____/ /../ /.,/ Uootb Dav Vear Arrival TiAe Month Day Year Check in lime 3:00 p.m. '^heck out time 12:00 noon $51.00 + tax single (one person) $51.00 * tax double (two people) I will arrive after 4:00 p.m. Please guarantee the reservation with: (Credit Card)Number and Expiration Date Phone (. MAIL THIS PORTION TO: Airport Hilton Hotel 9800 East 80th Street Bloomington, MN 55425 (612) 854-2100 J V. r ■ S I i i Im iin [ < sz 2 e g r o I'r • ?r::- to11 n 8, L ! t 0'9 i I? % ? i =1 n i I # # I i tJfe General information D u M Fridiy, February 7,1992 Location Programs wiO be heki at the Minneapoli»5t. Paul Airport Hilton, 9800 E. 90th Sl, Bloomington, Mtnne* sota 55425, (612) 854-2100. Reglatratioo Register in advance by completing and returning the form in this brochure. Multiple regisiratiotu can be made by dup' ating the form. Deadline to register is Friday, January 91,1992. CanwBmion/RelMnda Should inclemen* weather (or other circumstances beyond our control) necessiute program cancellation or postponement, parikipanu will be nodfied via announcementton WCCO Radio and other local radio stations. Feet v> ill be refunded ONLY if cancelladon nodficadon is received by Wednesday, February 5, or if the program is cancelled. Persons pre-registered (but not pre-paid) who do not attend this event will be billed for the endre registradon fee. Alternate represenudves will be accepted at any time. For futlhsi infocmadon Barb Croucher (for registradon assistance) Vivian Hart (for program quesdora) Government Training Service Suite 401. 480 Cedar Street Sl Paul, Minnesota 55101 (612) 222-7409 or Minnesota toO free 800/652-9719 About Government Training Service 1990 recipient of Organizational Support for ExceKence In Training Award (American Society for Training and Dev^opment) QTS ia a public organization whoaa mtaaiofi is to maal tha changing managamant and laadarahip naads of poicymaliars, aUlf, and appointad oHiciala by providing innovaliva, comprahansiva. practical training, and consulting to publicly tundad organizations in Minnesota. I CovernmrnI Training Si*rvire presents... Two Seminars for Elected Officials The Art of Public Leadership • Developing e vision • peeling with change • Strengthening channels of cooimunication Survival Skills for the Elected Official Fsiday, Fckniary 7* 19V2 MbiMapalls-Sl. Paal Airport HW m Blaoaslagfa*. Mluaaala i Jv-.'The Art of Public Leadership fMtftWtknmjlt Itft SpmtmtHj Cmmnmtmt IhmnmgServkt f Tlufimwtpoi^byi<y of > leader »to define lOi^. IhelaMM to lay thank you. Inbetween ; (thm laici) the leader is a tervanL * (Max I D^ne, Lmdtnki^ u an Aii} The era of leadership through comoiand and conlrol is hisioryt In the 199(h, certain bpes of kadeit with new leadenhip skills wil be needed if wewM *foUo«i«n* to respond poMiively. LadmUp» Kke (rowth. transition, and conflict is mlnliOMfy process controlled by a variety of «il factors and lunity. HutMH^ lecture, snull and large group discua- sion, indhridusl introspection, and practice skill applicariow pssrticipantssiim address the leadenhip aodskillirelaicdto: • fanpoconoe of having a vision • The power ofavahie^lriven rather than results- • Howto be a sculptor of people’s dreams • Leadenhipbehavion which help to make a visioo happen • Looking at what I really believe • How bdieft affect my leadenhip • Learning how to learn, how to unlearn, how to • Undenianding the power of paiadig .'t: f- it. Strengthening channels of conunmdention • Developing strategics for effective interpersonal communication * How to ask the right questions * How to convey your message * Dealing witli conflict * Communicating with constituents Participants will abo examine some of the phn< dples and foundations being used by today’s successful political and business leaders. The day will be practical, affirming, chaHenging and educational. John Bchrends will introduce you to innovative ideas and a creative approach that urill bring positive results to you and your community. Survival Skills for Ike Lleeled Official fiiday, Pctousry 7,1992 7:99 • 9:1 S p.in. Sponsomt by Women in Ci/y Cotmimmi FmenUd by Government Training Service Being an elected city official can be a fuU-ume. 24-hour per day job. Surviving the day-tOKlay demands, as well as getting from one election to the next, requires support systems and survival skills...mental, physicai, and political. In this seminar, panel presenters who represent varying length of service will share tnie4o-life. practical and humorous survival tips on how to handle a variety of issues such as: Dealing with special interest groups Keeping *in tune” with your coiutituenis Balancing your personal and professional life Adapting to change witliin your community John Behrends divides his tune between his pee> sonal business, conducting seaman and worinho| throughout the U.S., and his position at Mankato Technical College where he is responsible for training programs in supervision and John has presented at various ataaewide confer­ ences including those qwnsored by die Anodabon of Minnesota Counties, the Mimtesots Aaocistion of Townships and the Minnesota Qqr/Counqr Managen. Rcspondeniihaveaid,"goodid^ concrete and belpfuL.. it wm terrifid* Fee The regisiration fee of $75 includa tuition, lunch, breaks, pcisonal inventory, and handout aateriak In addition to presentations and open forum disetasions. the seminar will feature the oppo nity for small group activitia and dhilefie. All elected offidab and administrative staff are welcome to attend this evening of pwr^nnai sod profewional growth and eigoy an opportunity to socialize. George Latimer, (Moderator) Dean, Hamhne Univemqr College of Law, fonna Mayor of the City of Sc Paul Bonnie Cumberland, Mayor, Qqr of Bninerd Clarence Ranallo, Mayor. Gty ofSc Anthony Maria Vasiliou, Council Member, Qty of Plymouth Fee Registration fee of $25 includes tuition, refresh­ ments. and additional materials. J K-C-vb-k \ **.r. t:. A t CITY of ORONO MunkipdCNIlm talOfIks Bmii C17^ Ray. Mkimoca 953234M6 December 12r 1991 Richard Flint 1405 County Road 6 Long Lake, MN 55356 Dear Dick, I enjoyed the Park Commission meeting on December 3rd. I was impressed with the commitment of the Commission to qaality parks and recreation facilities and activities, and with the level of knowledge of the commission members concerning parks and recreation issues. It seemed that one issue that came up in relation to several of the agenda items was the question of responsibility for actually following through on or implementing the CoHunission's recommendations. My view on this issue is that once a recommendation is approved by the Council it is staff's responsibility to follow through. As we discussed at our meeting at the Hennepin County Parks Office, there has not been a lot of staff time available for parks projects. This has been due to John Gerhardson's Acting Administrator responsibility and the ongoing city facilities project. John will continue to be busy with the facilities project from March to November of 1992. For this reason it is important that the Park Commission prioritize its work projects for 1992 and provide this information to staff and Council in early *92 to assist them in prioritizing the City's work projects for the year. In addition to assisting staff and Council in their work planning the effort spent by the Commission in prioritizing its work projects will provide the Commission with a blueprint for its work for the year. The Commission may want to spend some time at its January meeting discussing its 1992 work plan. TELEimONE - 4TJ-TJ57 • FAX • 4TJ4510 Richard Flint December 12, 1991 page 2 of 2 Once again, I enjoyed meeting the members of the Park Comaission and I look forward to working with you and the Commission in the coming year. Sincerely, Ron Moorse City Administrator cc: Mayor and City Council John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director ! 5 il- ^VE-? »fV Pf> S|;k . ^ T k- . t><)- -■fi-NV f^- ii- W\m. p>- ':h^,-,. ¥ :r-^-' • ■v'»: ‘ r-\- I"'-,‘X^. “^■i- ¥■ K; &!'- V- %r' :>• I..... >■. N,i M ntONINO. STATE Of L oepartment of natural resourcesJ M€tro Waters, 1200 Warner Rd., St. Paul, MN 55106^ 772-7910 Dacenber 13, 1991 ntC 1’ Mr. Merritt J. Peterson 4722 West Fair Hills Road Minnetonka, NN 55345 RE: Permit Extension #88-6192, Lake Minnetonka (27-133) west Arm #17, City of Orono, Hennepin County Dear Mr. Peterson: As requested in your letter of November 5, 1991, the expiration date of Permit #88-6192 is hereby extended to November 30, 1992. All other terms and conditions of the permit shall remain in full force and effect. plMsa notify us when the project is complete, and submit any as- built survey (if applicable) or photos of the project you may have available. Rvery attempt should be made to complete this project within the timeframe authorized under this permit. Sincerely, Sf*-— Line Stine Regional Hydrologist JLS/kka:88-6192E cc:USCOE Hennepin SWCO Minnehaha Creek WSD lilCD City of Orono D. Zappetillo, DNR Fisheries S. Walter, Conservation Officer R. Anderson, St. Paul Waters Lake Minnetonka (27-133) file #17 L?!:a it> n:.<-.>.crik<' AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER y X I*-••- - - - - - - - - j MINUTES LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS C(SOT€S^^ 1991 FULL COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY« NOVEMBER 19, 1991 5*00 P.M. ROOM 204 EXCELSIOR COMMUNITY CENTER 443 OAK STREET, EXCELSIOR I.CALL TO ORDER Chair Brancal callad the meeting DIRECTORS PRESENT Howard Bennia/Deephaven Jim Olda/Excelsior Ann Thlea/Medina Robert Murphy/Excelsior Bobbi Abdo/Minnetonka Beach Otto Hilcaok/Minnetriata Tin Salacar/Mlnnetriflta Andrew Wlenaerl Jr./ St. Bonifacius Barb Brancel/Shorewood Dean Johnson/Shorewood Lesley Hughes'’Seaiiians/Tonka Bay Gerald Schmeig/Victorla to order at S:05. OTHERS PRESENT Kathe Ehlert/Ad.Asst. Paul Nazarow/Triax II.APPROVAL OF MINUTES Brancel asked £or discussion or a motion to approve the October minutes. Motion ll.19.91.lt Olds moved to approve the October minutes, Hughes-Seamans seconded. The motion passed unanimously. 111.REPORTS Treasurer's Report Hllcsek presented the 3rd quarter report, stating that the Commission was generally on budget. Motion 11.19.91.21 Wilczek moved to accept the 3rd quarter report. Salazar seconded. The notion passed unanimously. tfilcsek presented the Just Claims for the period 10/1//91 through 11/12/91, stating that a Certificate of Deposit had been cashed, with part going to SCCU and part to the checking ac­ count. The following month's Just Claims report would reflect this transfer. Motion 11.19.91.3I Wilczek moved to approve the Just Claims for the period 10/17/91 through 11/12/91. Olds seconded. The mo­ tion passed unanieously. Administrative Update Wilczek reported that resume*s for the Job of administrator had been received and interviews scheduled for November 21. He stated Jim Schindler had received a complaint froe a subscriber regarding intarference on Channel 21 and that Nazarov would take care of it. Another subscriber had complained that he felt the time allowed for payment of monthly bills was too short. Following discussion with Theis and Schmeig, Wilczek agreed to inform the subscriber that the Commission feels the payment time to be reasonable. I- 1. ik: LMCCC Hinutes--Page Two Triax Report Nazarow distributed the monthly and studio reports. Homes Passed Basic Subs Expanded Basic Subs Total Pay Units Total A/0 s Total Remotes 11,916 107 6,048 3,6b9 3,944 2,367 Hazarow stated there had been three complaints received and all had been taken care of. Victoria subscribers had been given one day credit due to Intermittent outages in that area, another subscriber had asked about upgrading the system to allow for stereo and Nazarov explained that could not be done until the second phase of the fiber optic system had been completed. Nazarov reported that Triax technicians, as well as an out­ side engineer had spent a great deal of time trying to find the source of the problems on Channel 6. He explained that the sig­ nal originates in Brooklyn Park and goes through more amplifiers than any other channel. For this reason it is possible that the problem might not be in Triax*s system. He stated Triax will continue to monitor Channel 6 and try to determine the source of the problem, but that it has become a lower priority. Olds stated the Commission is not willing to give up on proper recep­ tion, and that Triax should continue to work on the problem until alternative transmission systems become available. Nazarov agreed that Triax vas committed to researching alterna­ tive transmission methods. IV.UHFIMISHED BUSINESS e> Prmmmntationm Regarding 1991 Budget Wilcsek explained that some of the cities which had rejected the 1992 proposed budget had asked for clarification from a com mission member. Most of the questions had been regarding the proposed salary increases and the conferences and professional organizations. Wilezek reported that he had informed the Tonka Bay city council about the activities of the Commission, explaining the budget and budgeting process. Olds stated that Spring Park had been pleased a commissioner had come to explain the process. •b) Metro Cable Nmtword Channel 6 Signal Problem This item had been addressed during the Triax report o) Joint Powers/Bylaws Reviews Counsel Recommendations Commissioners were directed to the attachment outlining the proposed revisions as recommend*#t’ by legal counsel. Olds ex­ plained that they are housmke*»p.!.ng changes to reflect policy changes that had already been enacted. Schmeig asked about the check stamp procedure. Olds explained that with two signatures required on checks, it had become extremely difficult for the administrator to obtain the necessary signatures and that a stamping procedure had been initiated several months previous. Ji* i:r' t' fe- Minutes --Page Three Hofclon 11.19.91.4; Johnson moved to approve the counsel recom- ■endetxons of proposed changes to the Joint Powers Agreement and Bylaws* Bennls seconded. The motion passed unanimously. V.MEW BUSINESS s> Resume* Screening Coeelttee Report Brancel explained that a large number ot resume's had been received for the position of administrator, and the screening coeeittee had interviews scheduled for six of those applicants. Wilcsek stated that applicants had a variety of skills and the eoeeittee was looking for someone with public relations and marketing skills in addition to TV production skills. Bennis asked if the committee had been using the job description changes in the screening process. Olds stated he thought it would be premature to adopt those job description changes before hiring an administrator. Salazar asked how many applicants would be recommended by the committee and if the interviews would be open to all commissioners. Olds stated that the com­ mittee hoped to be prepared to make a recommendation to hire at the Becember executive committee meeting; that formal action by the executive committee would be needed to hire. He also stated the interviews would not be open to all commissioners to observe in order to not intimidate the candidates. b) 1992 Staff Salary S Job Description Recommendations Mo action was taken. c) 1990 Census Updated Member City Votes Wilcsek stated that the only change in representation was in Shorewood and that this change would take effect automatically. Olds stated that the votes weighted by population only apply to certain actions# such as changes to the franchis-^ agreement. On routine matters, a simple majority of members present is suffi- oient. No action was taken, bit the changes were recorded as needed for the next vote. VI. ADJOURMWEMT notion 11.19.91.5I Weinzerl moved to adjourn the meeting, Hughes-Seamans seconded. The meeting adjourned at 6i05 P.M. Respectfully submitted Kathe eWert, A^inistrative Assistant ones • 24M 24«S 24M 24*7 24M 2449 2470 2471 2472 2472 2474 2475 2474 i\n 2474 2479 2440 10244 10245 10244 10247 10244 2441 2442 2442 2444 2445 i'; r/. r:. k . Ml LNCCC ClaiM 10/17<11/12 DATE P4TA4LE Oct 17 4V Inc Oct 17 Innty Print* Oct 17 Pntty Cnnh Oct 17 US Poatnastnr Oct 21 Lightly Epicurean Oct 29 Scat 4uy Oct 29 Tonka Printing Oct 29 Ind School Diet 276 Oct 29 US Uoat Oct 29 IW Dopt 9#v*nu* Oct 29 Jin Schindler Oct 29 Jnnnifnr Vatta Oct 29 CCTV Oct 29 Kay Cunninghan Oct 20 Cinoquipt Oct 20 Star/Tribune Oct 20 PEIA Oct 21 Jie Schindler Oot 21 Jennifer Vatta Oct 21 Jennifer Vatta Oct 21 Aaron Slechert Oot 21 Kathe Ehlort Moe 12 NS Suburban Puba Hoe 12 Oernlck 4 Lifaon Sou 12 VS Poet Office Noe 12 Paychex, Inc Sov 12 Star/Tribune TOTAL CUIHS AMOUNT ACCOUNT 105.89 niac video 36.30 acceaa dev fund 97.76 varioua 29.00 Pontage 68.50 Acceaa Dev Fund 64.91 Office Equip 103.20 Office auppllea 430.00 Office Rent 113.51 Telephone 674.52 State Taaea 16.22 Mileage 56.10 Mileage 40.00 Acceaa Dev Fund 880.00 Acceaa Dev Fund 33.57 Mlac Video 150.00 Adv/prono 191.30 PERA Benefita 669.14 Payroll 852.08 Payroll 876.93 Vacation 216.43 Payroll 77.53 Payroll 163.80 44a 247.50 Legal 71.03 Pontage 51.70 Sec'y Serv 150.00 4d* 66506.92 BANK nCELSIOR Beginning balance Claiaa Intereat Service Charge 615439.76 -6506.92 61.09 -12.40 EMDlllQ BALANCE 69181.53 8CCU ACCOUNTS Balance Share Acet Balance Preferred Cert, of Depoait (11/10) EMDIBC BALANCE TOTAL rUNOS 6765.41 . ; 53183.99 \ 26000.00 ' 645949.40 695130.93 •: i. r *>■ LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE TUESDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1991 ROOM 204, EXCELSIOR COMMUNITY CENTER 443 OAK STREET, EXCELSIOR 1.CALL TO ORDER Chair Brancal called the meeting to order at b:05 P.M. DIRECTORS PRESENT Barb Brancel/Shorewood Tie Pattrln/Orono Tie Salazar/Minnetnata Jleeie Hright/Greeneood JiM Olda/Excelsior Lesley Hughee-Seamans/Tonka Bay II.MEW ADMINISTRATOR SELECTION DECISION Anderson, Pattrin and Olds reported to the commlaaionera on the background and gualifIcatlona o£ the two major cindidates for the position of administrator. Copies of resume's were distributed and discussesd. Olds and Pattrin stated they had checked references on both candidates and they were in order. Motion 12.3.91.11 Wright moved to approve the hiring of James Dsniels as cable administrator, Hughes-Seamans seconded. The motion passed unanisously. Brancel agreed to contact Nr. Daniels and inform him of the decision. Motion 12.3.91.21 Olds moved to specify that Mr. Terrance Kucera be offered the position of administrator if Mr. Daniels refused. Wright seconded. The motion passed unanimously. Beeause of the approaching holidays and the fact that a new administrator had Just been hired. Chair Brancel asked commissioners if thsy felt the regularly scheduled Commission £oT December should be held. Olds recommended that meeting be cancelled, with the understanding that a special meeting could be called if necessary. Commissioners agreed. Discussion followed regarding the salary level for the new administrator. Motion 12.a.91.3t Salasar moved that the starting salary for the new administrator be 431,500. Pattrin seconded. The motion passed unanimously. III. ADJOURNMENT Brancel asked for Motion 12.3.91.4» Seamans seconded. Th notion to adjourn. moved to adjourn the meeting, Hughes motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted. KWthe Ehlert, Aominlstrative Assistant Ii. l ■ * I- I?-ip L‘ r fi % t.'. i"'- r,?h f t'I'v:'k •i-. • 'f*k ?r' -E I't I;. f«w Minnetonka Cable Communicatlona Commission443 OAK STREET • EXCELSIOR. MINNESOTA 55331 • (6121 474-5539 TOi City Ad»inintr4tor» m ■ -, y . <• FROH t Barb Br«nc« DATES 0«CMb«r 10« 1991 B£t CoMisAion nppoint*®nt0 B«e«u0« city •ppolnt.0i»t. nr. g.nermlly mad# In 0«ndinQ you tho •ttondanco roport of tho •••tings of tho L Hinnotonka CabXo Co««unication* Cosmlssion, shouing of ■••ting# h^ld, *nd th^ nu«b^r of •••tings stt«nds ^ ettv rsor«ssnt«tivs. If your city's rnprsssntstiavs has bsan unabla to attond tho quarterly full c®**^**^®". aoDOint a roprosontativo uho will bo ablo to attend, so that ao^rato inforaation can bo rolayod to your city. Thank you. V- * if |Tt • • ^r », <j’« ••*• •. *# ^ Ir H- k- ‘'S i: II u ^r-. i-; & H-!I- 1991 MEETING REPORT Fro* Nov#*b«r 1990, through November 1991, there /ere 11 eeetlnga of the Leke Minnetonka Ceble Comeunicetlone Coeeiesion li^Xd. Here le e report of attendance at thoee meetinga* EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Anderaondeft ofc.May *91) Brancel Olda Hughea-Seaaana Wilcaek Pattrin(appointed Jan,*91) Salasar(appointed Jan '91) Wright DIRECTORS Murphy Wienserl Sohaieg Bennia Abdo NarkXe Johnaon Thela (appointed Jan'91) Dill Stahr (alternate) Hillia T Searteood (left ofc Jan '91) Sehults (appoi.ited Jm'91) Walah (appointed Jan '91> Peteraon (alternate) Butler Hiraoh Roaen Kraeaer (alternate) Seneacall Henry Jaeobaen (alternate) ATTENDED 5 9 10 9 10 7 7 4 5 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OUT OF 6 11 11 11 11 9 9 11 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 S 5 1 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 irf r '*11 f MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SCHOOL 80ARL OF ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 278 HELD ON NOVEMBER 12, 199’ The regular meeting of the School Board of Oronc Indep'-nd 278 was held on Tuesday, November 12, 1991. V' Sen ol District No. f • f Present: David McKown John Maresh Peg Swanson Martha Van de Ven Inomis Mich Ne.l .awson Absent: Don Andr of James Franklin W)N MOTION by John Maresh, econded by Peg Swanson, tne coi jg-^nda was approved as follows: - approved the minutes of the October 28, 1991 regular meeting; - approved the transfer of Sara Fngel (Oronc High School business education and work experience teacher, to the Ridgedale Alternative Program; - approved the request of Sarah McDermott, Orono Primary School teacher, for a leave of absence for the second semester of the 1991-92 school year; - approved the appointment of Lori Wencx as a first grade teacher at Orono Primary School for the second semester of the 1991-92 school year; - accepted the resignation of Sandy Odenthal, custodian at Schumann Elementary, effective November 15. 1991; - apprnv.>d the Acti.ity Fund Report for the First Quar'^er, 1991; - approved the bills as covered by vouchers 071890 through 072086 and construction bill as covered by vouchers 1447 through 1468. Motion carried. Dr. Mich expressed congratulations/appreciation to everyone who participated in or helped organize the Parent Communication Network meetings that took place on October 29 and November 6; that the Decemb'^r 9 Board reeling will begin at 7:15 p.m. which will allow the Board to meet at 6:30 p.m. with the newly formed Student Advisory Committee; that he wanted to express congratulations/appreciation to all of those who participated in the teacher iiteviotTation process which has resulted in a tentative agreement; that on December 5 at 7:30 a.m., a breakfast will be held with area legislators. Peg Swanson expressed appreciation to Marge Gasch and Marvin Johnson for the HTC #287 special education program tour*, that she attended with them during the past week. Martha Van de Ven stated that she hid attended an MS3A workshop and as a result she wanted to compliment the leadership on Orono*s Board of Education for the foresight to engage in long-range pi inning. Or. Mich stated that transfer of Sara Eng the consent agenda tonight, the Board approved the to a teaching position at the Ridgedale Alternative I:.. ... r Ki.: Program, which is operat'd by HTC #287. By way of explanation he stated that given the relationship be^een HTC and our School District, Ms. Engel remains as an enplrvee of our School District and is transferred to the Alternative Program. Dr. Mich conmented on the long-range planning information the Boa-'d had received in*their packets which included membership on each of the committees and a ten­ tative charge for each committee. A meeting to bring all of the members of the respective committees together will be held on December 5 at 7t00 p.m. UPON MOTION by Martha Van de Ven, seconded by John Maresh, the Board of Education ratified the Secretarial Master Contract for 1991-9.1 as negotiated by the Board Negotiating Committee. Motion carried. l^N MOTION by John Maresh, seconded by Peg Swanson, the Board of Education ratified the Paraprofessional Master Contract for 1991-93 as negotiated by the Board Negotiating Coc>^iltee. Motion carried. bill Fenhol provided the Board witn a final report on the construction of the Orono Education Link reviewing such areas as the beginnings of the project, the redesign/rebid process, the use of a construction manager, the change order costs and a summary of all revenues and expenditures. Dave McKown expressed appreciation to Bill Fenholt for his direction/leadership during this project. Or. Mich also expressed appreciation to Mr. Fenholt and his staff for a job well done. Chairman McKown stated, that with the permission of the Board, they would move to Agenda Item two under New Business at this time and he called on Ms. Peg Swanson to introduce the motion. Ms. Swanson stated that it was her honor, on behalf of the Board of Education, to MOVE that the Board of Education officially name the high school auditorium - The Wini»n A. Fenholt Auditorium, in appreciation and gratitude for Bill's many years of service and his dedication to the Orono School District. Motion seconded by John Maresh. Bill Fenholt expressed appreciation to the Board for this honor and stated that the Board could not have chosen a project that was more meaningful to him than the aw* orium and that he greatly appreciates this recognition. Motion carried. The Board heard a report from Dick and Carol Parrish, who had requested time on ti:e agenda, regarding the music program in the District. The report covered problem areas, exclusive of the music personnel, in the music program as well as presenting solutions to those problems and the request that th« Boat'd act posi­ tively in response to their report. -r i-r He' n. It I r n- -:y ft-, ^ Vw- ■I a: k '■/ ' r‘^' I'V.f. :K ■:sr I♦ ri.- !•^fc flte> 1Or. Mich responded that the formation of a band boosters program could provide for recoonition of students, social events, community awareness, etc. but that the Board will review the request for full academic credit which is now under consideration by a committee at the high school and whose recommendation should be sent to administration on or before December 1, 1991. Or. Mich also stated that with reports of this nature, the Board dc-s not typically comment or respond at this time. Mr. McKown expressed aporeciation to Mr. research/worx they have done in this area. and Mrs. Parrish for the The Board viewed a portion of the Joel Barker tape, "The Power of Vision". Dr. Mich stated that he thought this tape would be beneficial as the District begins its long-range planning process. The next Board meeting will be December 9, 1991 at 7:15 p.m. UPON MOTION by John Maresh, seconded by Peg Swanson, the meeting was adjourned. Motion carried. n Maresh, Clerk Approved: Dave McKown, Chairman LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT December 12, 1991 :< rl. S.4 H Is i 6 D X J X to: FRon: City Administrators Executive Director Gene Strommei SUBJECT:Resolution for State Legislative Support and a Draft Concept for Controls on Lake Minnetonka to Prevent the Introduction of Zebra Mussel and Spread of Eurasian Water Milfoil Zebra Mussel and Eurasian Water Milfoil have received new attention this past month. Public concern is growing to prevent milfoil spread from infested lakes. Local concern has been expressed to keep Zebra Mussel out of Lake Minnetonka. Zebra Mussel has been identified in the Mississippi River as of August, 1991. The DNR believes it will be found in other of the river, as close as St. Paul. The St. Croix I0 also susceptible to Zebra Mussel infestation. concept to prevent Zebra Mussel spread bj controlling accesses to Lake Minnetonka was introduced for discussion to the LMCD Board at its 12/4/91 meeting. Board mombors have been asked to discuss this concept with an upcoming Council meeting, before LMCD’s 1/11/92 Water Structures and gnvironment Committee meeting. (Some board members may have already talked to their Councils prior to this notice.) We ask that you familiarize yourself and Council members with the enclosed Subcommittee report as it relates to Zebra Mussel controls. A Zebra Mussel fact sheet is also enclosed. Given the MN DNR position and significant financial needs, it should be noted that funding such a proposal has yet to be determined. The Resolution also enclosed speaks to the prospect of securing state-wide funding for both exotic species. The •tate funding resolution, however, would likely not provide any funding for the 1992 boating season. The challenge, then, is to weigh the threat with alternative funding needs. The LMCD board approved a plan for LMCD staff to develop the concept and cost considerations for discussion in January. The board is vitally interested in city council feedback. Your LMCD board member is expected to make arrangements to appear before your council on this subject as well. Than you for cooperating with your board member and LMCD. cc: LMCD Board Members w & r if •VI I t r* » ■ .I?- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Water Structures and Environment Committee DRAFT CONCEPT 11/18/91 FLAM OF ACTION TO PREVENT THE INTRODUCTION OF ZEBRA MUSSEL INTO, AND TO PEEVEHT THE SPREAD OF EUPJVSIAN WATER MILFOIL OUT OF, LAKE MINNETONKA 1. Haintein a limited number of high quality public and private accesses, cloaing resuilnlng accesses. 2.Attend operating accesses up to 24 hours dally, depending upon the access, season and %reather. Operating accesses will be closed during unattended periods. 3.Authorize licensed marinas and car washes to operate a user-fee supported total boat cleaning service, from which a "certificate' will be Issued for all boats entering the lake from an attended operating access. 4.with "certificates" are allowed lake entry at attended-operating accesses, subject to an access fee for entry verification and departure inspection for Eurasian water milfoil contamination. Dealer-certified new boats exempt at first launch with proof of purchase. 5. Restrict live bait use in the lake to bait from certified zebra mussel and EWM free sources. 6. Creatly Increase the number of available boat rentals of all types. 7. Increase the number of short term storage rental slips on the lake. 11/18/91 '.'t i: ^ I; LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Subcommittee to Guide 1992 Planning for EKM Control, Spread Prevention, and Zebra Mussel Inspection Procedures for Lake Minnetonka Meeting Held; 3:30 pm, Monday, December 2. 1991 Present:ForceENM Task Force Chair Tom Reese, EWM Task Vice Chair Bert Foster, LMCD Chair Dave Cochran, John Barten, Hennepin Parks: Neal Castagne, LMLOA; Dick Osgood, Freshwater Foundation: Cliff Reep, Mtka Portable Dredging Tom Sak, MN DNR: Admn Technician Rachel Thibault, Exec. Dir. Gene Strommen -- LMCD. Abaent:Kevin Kretsch, Lake Restoration, Inc.; Jerry Rockvam, Marina Representative. INTRODUCTION. Reese thanked the participants for sharing thait time and experience on the 1992 plans for LMCD s EWM Weed Harvesting Control program, as well as looking at what would be appropriate to prevent the introduction of Zebra Mussel into Lake Minnetonka. EXPERIENCE TO DATE, The 1989 prograais end comparisons were highest acreage year was 1990 1,800 acres were under permit resulted in considerably less surface. Onlv 765 acres were introduction of the barge to dramatically reduced harvest volume was less resulting in originally anticipated. The shortened season resulted in the barge to reduce costs. , '90 and’ 91 weed harvesting reviewed by Strommen. The at 1,347 acres. While some for 1991, the high water levels EWM plant growth on the lake harvested as a result. The receive harvested weeds travel time. However, the weed smaller daily barge loads that closing four weeks of the using shore off-load in lieu of FACTORS LIKELY TO INFLUENCE 1992 PLAN: A.High Water Levels, may cause a lag in growth in the deeper waters, with growth to move in to the pP0viously exposed dry shore. Surface area matting could be reduced as growth lags due to deeper water. Heavy Snow Cover, could cause a weed winter kill in some areas. B.Controls at Accesses to Prevent Spread, a state-wide concern, is presumed to be accomplished in conjunction with state legislation needed to fund personnel and equipment to attend to watercraft inspections at accesses. The MN Lake Management Federation has appointed a Steering Committee to p-p; IP J- ’.I H •. I f k- (i •■ I i y- Subcommittee for 1992 EWM Control Program Plan. 12/2/91, p. 2 C. D. I// fn' ^ - . develop legislation to meet this concern. The LKCD executive director is serving on this Steering Commit tee. Herbicide Use to Control. Eradicate EWM, has been suggested for some lakes by various product suppliers Sonar, Garlon 3 and Bensulferon are recent products which have been suggested for eradication potential. Barten does not believe the certainty exists for Sonar, now in more prevalent use, to eradicate EWM. Sak has been supported by John Barco, CoE, in that fall applications of 2~4D maj' be more effective in EWM control. Sonar must be applied in early spring. Raese sees Bensulferon, or “Maranen", by DuPont, being a more environmentally desirable herbicide. Gary Pullman, a Dow-Elanco representative, has offered to discuss a pilot treatment for EWM on Lake Minnetonka. It was suggested he come in mid~January. Cochran concurs that LMCD has a duty to look into alternative treatment methods. Herbicide treatment of accesses, where needed, and removal of floating weeds was agreed a '92 necessity. It was also recommended other HIGH USE ACCESSES be identified for herbicide treatment in addition to the nine formal public and numerous marina accesses. Treatment at these accesses would be negotiated. 1992 EWM CONTROL PROGRAM OPTIONS: Conduct fully utilizing shore off-load, excluding use of the barge, eliminating harvest areas where travel distance to off-load point exceeds 1/4 hour unless a major priority. Conduct fully utilizing barge for receiving harvested EWM comparable to 1991 program, taking into account barge supplier's advice of the need for a longer, 10 to 12 hour work day, suitable on a four day week. Zebra Mussel Presence and Infestation Potential was discussed. Growing concern for the potential infestation in Minnesota lakes was prompted by its discovery in the Mississippi River near LaCrosse, WI, Reese and other Task Force members brought together literature and experiences in other water bodie-. f y ■ Subcoaaittee for 1992 EW>! Control Program Plan, 12/2/91, P. 3 A draft concept " Plan o: Action to Prevent Introduction of Zebra Mussel into, and Prevent Spread of Eurasian Water Milfoil out of Lake Minnetonka", presented by Reese to the LMCD Water Structures and Environment Committee 11/16 was presented for discussion. Comments from the sub~ committee members included: la*. Sak - The issue of fairness for boats using accesses vs. homeowners living on the lake roust be factored into any plan. The DNR position recommends infestation control at the source. Any cleaning programs at lake sites/accesses would require legislative approval. This is due' pr imar i ly to the fee .structure which could be prohibitive to frequent lake access users. Present DNR position on selected e.xotic species strategies will r . support closing accesses on infested or uninfested water bodies. It also cannot support access fees at public water accesses for inspections, but it is open to other revenue sources — in particular an increase in the watercraft registration fee. Barten - Requiring a fee-supported inspection at accesses for boaters who know they have not been in Zebra Mussel infested waters will, in Barren's judgement, result in widespread objection to such a requirement as unnecessary and burdensome. Public resistance will be high. Foster ~ Zebra Mussel may onl,- be a matter of time before it reaches recreation lakes, in spite or the most conscientious inspection efforts and considering the complexity of boat cleansing procedures. Spread by waterfowl also appears to be a utrong likelihood. In the event of a recreation lake being infested, changes in how boats are stored in the water and maintenance on docks and other water equipment will be added responsibilities for marinas and lakeshore residents. Castagne ~ Problems wich infrequently used boat motors stored in the lake being clogged by Zebra Mussel growth within the water chambers during even short term storage (a week or two) represents a major threat. : * ’* ] r- •; -2:'; \'k § ■.r- i:'^ R- k k: |ir1^1^ r Ir I? F r ip- tv,’.to tF I& Uw mL. Subcoanittee for 1992 EWM Control Program Plan, 12/2,'91, P. 4 CONCLUSIONS. While there is agreement that the spread of Z«bra Mussel from infested waters to recreation lakes must be prevented, the most cost effective way to control it on a state~wide basis is at the source. Considering the extent of the Mississippi River, and some point the connecting St. Croix River, such control will be a challenge. The difficulties in limiting access to a given lake through its own independent inspection procedures has been pointed out in the previous discussion. Reese reiterated his desire to have the draft concept "fleshed out** with cost and other factors to determine its feasibility. He expects to present that idea to the LMCD board during its discussion of the draft concept 12/4. ADJOURNMENT. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 5:50 pm. For the committee. 7 ^ ^ 7. Eugene R. Strommen Executive Director v; LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 900EAST WAY2ATA90lfl£VAP0 SinTt f«0 WAVZATA MINNESOTA SS391 TEU»%CE€ EUGENC R. STROMMEN EXECUTIVE OE^CTOR Dec«nber 12, 1991 Th« Honorable Gen Olson 6750 County Road 110 West Mound, MH 55364 Otar Senator Olson: •*T;e threat of exotica on Minnesota's public waters has received your attention In recent legislative sessions. You responded to thle growing problem by providing Initial funding through a partial water­ craft surcharge, and later extending that $2 surcharge to all water­ craft. We thank you for providing these Important funds. New information on exotics affecting public waters Indicates that Zebra Husael la now in the Mississippi River. The splney water flea and Ruffe fish Join Eurasian water milfoil and Zebra Mussel to threaten fishery resources as well as recreational values of our lakes. The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) recognizes the Impact of these threats to all Minnesota's waters. The LMCD therefore adopted a resolution December 4 urging state-wide initiatives and accompanying aniitl-source funding to aggressively challenge these threats. The LMCD Is also examining how it can be a more effective agent to further meet these needs as It enters Its fourth year of controlling Eurasian water milfoil. Suraslan Water Milfoil Task Force Chair Tom Reese joins the entire LMCD board and task force In irglng your support of legislation to address controlling the th» .at of exotics in Minnesota s water resources. Thank you for your active involvement toward this end. Sincerely, lake MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT /s/ David H. Cochran David H. Cochran Chair enct LMCD Resolution re Exotics Similar letter to other legislators: Sen. Renneke, Traub, Lessard, Berg, Dahl, Kinkel Rep. Abrams, Bodahl. Knickerbocker. Smith. Hunger, Battaglia, Kinkel c/enc: LMCD Municipalities e- ! • ft LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING STATE LEGISLATIVE. ACTION TO PREVENT THE SPREAD OF ZEBRA MUSSEL AND EURASIAN WATER MILFOIL THROUGH EXPANDED FUNDING, EDUCATION AND CONTROL WHEREAS Zebra Mussel and Eurasian water milfoil have boen identified as aquatic threats to the recreational lakes in the State of Minnesota, and WHEREAS Zebra Mussel has been positively identified as eaiating in the Mississippi River at LaCrosse, WI, an’ potentially as close as St. Paul, and WHEREAS Lake Minnetonka has been infested with Eurasian ilfoil since 1987, and WHEREAS Zebra Mussel is largely spread by larvae not visible to the unaided eye in wet areas of a boat and possibly trailer equipment, and may also spread by larvae carried in live bait containers, either from bait provided froa infested waters, or water added to bait, from invested ifeters, by persons using and saving bait for use in uninfested waters: and WHEREAS Eurasian water milfoil is largely spread by plant fragments carried on watercraft and trailers, and WHEREAS the widespread infestation of these exotics will be extraordinarily costly to private as well as public interests, . . . . .. (f •'*’ w I ?■ LMCD Resolution No. 78 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District urgently recommends implementation of an immediate state action plan to prevent the spread of Zebra Mussel and Eurasian water milfoil into Minnesota's uninfested waters considering the following: 1) Funding comprehensive public education, exotic control programs and inspection programs at all public and private accesses where infestation of Zebra Mussel or Eurasian water milfoil is known to exist, through multi~source funding mechanisms which may include: a) Special levy authorization for all cities or counties and lake improvement districts b) Additional watercraft license surcharge; c) Inspection fee at public and private commercial accesses 2) Immediately expanding public education, advising watercraft operators of the means by which Zebra Mussel and Eurasian water milfoil are spread. 3) Adopting stringent regulation prohibiting the taking of live bait from infested waters for private or commercial use. Adopted by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Board of Directors this 4th day of December, 1991. Bxec6iive Director Euge Chairman David Cochran Executive DirectorEugene R. Strommen Vol. 10 No. 1 Spring/Summer 1991 Olficlal Publication of the Association of Professional Biologists of British Columbia Spring/Summer 1991 BioLLne Zebra Mussels - A New Biological Pollutant Introduction "Biological poIIulajiLs" axe organ ­ isms that cause impacts or changes dial invariably become undesirable to man or harmful to the ecosystem. Unlike toxic chemical agents, biologi ­ cal pollutants magnify impacts by reproducing (often prolifically) and may spread of their ov^m volition. In a sense they partially meet the defini­ tion of ’‘weeds'* - in the wrong place at the wrong lime. The fresh water rebra mussel {Dreissena polymorpha Pallas) quali­ fies as a biological pollulani. already becoming an environmental concern in Ontario and the Great Lakes region, and threatening freshwater systems throughout North Americx The object of this article is to review biological features of aebra mussels and to encourage awareness about this new 'Jucal to fresh waters in NortJi America. Origins and Biological Cliaracteristics Zebra mussels (described by PaJIas in 177k as Dreissena polymorpha) were first recorded in the northern Caspian Sea and Ural River. By the early ISOO’s. British canals were invaded by zebra mussels and rapid spread was simultaneously recorded in Germany. Holland and Denmark. Scandinavia and Switzerland reported its appearance in the 19‘10‘s and I960's rcspectivciy and expansion through the Soviet Union continues to occur. Italy. FjiJand and now Canada and the United States record its pres­ ence. The publication by Mackic ct al. (1989) provides an excellent review of zebra mussel literature and is acknowledged as the main source of biological irtformation presented here. Tnc zebra mussel is a distinctive, strongly byssatc bivalve with the characteristic alternating brown and cream or yellowish wavy banding of the shell lending the name (see illus­ tration). Tlic shell is shaded like that of the edible marine mussel (Mytilus cdulii) reaching a ma.vimum Icngtli of about 5 cm. Tlic life liistory is charac­ terized by a free-swimming veligcr stage and production of strong and numerous byssaJ threads during adult stages. Byssal threads allow this mus­ sel to attach to each other and in a wide range of habitats, without com­ petition and in high densities. The yearling mussels may detach from the byssal threads, later producing new byssal attachments in another loca­ tion. Young mussels may migrate to deeper water to seek warmer water and escape ice scouring in winter (O'Neill and MacNcill. 1989). Reproductive capacities of zebra mussels explain part of llic reason for its successful and rapid spread. Adults continued on page 6 «• BioLine '*bl 10 No. 1 !S from page S are se.xually mature by the second year (of a five year life span based on European observations) and each female produces 30.000 to 40.000 eggs per year. Egg development occurs between water temperatures from about 12'C to 24*C. The free swimming Iai"vae (veligers) have been recorded in wa-ers rancir.g from I6*C to about 25'C but lan ai growth and development are suppressed at higher temperatures. Larvae may be present for periods of 2 to 8 months in the year, depending on climate and water temperatures, and each veliger may remain mobile for periods of about 8 to 21 days prior to settling (Anon. 1939). Settling and attachment may be successful on any solid, non-toxic substrate and about 12 byssal threads may be produced per day by adults. Attachment is upMkely in flows greater than 2.0 (O 2.5 m/second. Growth rates are dependent on food supply and temperature, and may be up to 2 cm in the fust year. Calcium is required for shell production and lev- els must e.Ncecd 10 mg;!- in the w ater for good dc\elopmeni. Life spans of individual mussels arc recorded to range from 3 to 9 years. Zebra mus­ sels are filter feeders (ingestion of parucles up to 450 jim in diameter is reported) and adults may filter up to about one liue of w ater per day. Zebra mussels are capable of anaerobic metabolism and may sur­ vive 3 to 4 days in anaerobic condi ­ tions. Waste materials are accumulat­ ed into pseudofaeces which are eject­ ed from the inhalant siphon. Zebra mussels may be found in water depths up to 50 m. thriving in depths from 1 to 4 m in warm, slow moving water. The minimum density of veligers approximates the upper ihermoclLne depth in European lakes. Populations have established in w aters w ith wide ranges of trophic character- *. n. Zebra Mussels (D-e ssers pc'ync'p^'S) Photo courtesy oi i^e Cniar-o Ministry c! N'etural P-escu'ces. isucs from oligoucphic to cutrcphic. with the greatest densities in lakes with large surface area. Densities cf up to 700.000 adult zebra mussels m- have been recorded on a power plant intake in Lake Eric: colonics may- build up to a thickness of 1.5 m (Anon. 1991). Zebra mussels are subject to high mortalities during the veliger stage and they are most vulnerable duru'.g the settling phase. Fish, crayfish and waterfowl may consume zebra mus­ sels. but the impacts of predators on European zebra mussel populations has been variable. Densities of mus­ sels do not appear to have been limit­ ed by these predators in most loca ­ tions. Parasites in zebra mussels have bee.n documented but have not signifi- camJy affected mussel populations. Sprin^/Summer 1991 BieLLnc Dispersal Boih veligcrs and young adults contribute to rapid spread of zebra mussels because of their mobility. Downstream drift may occur with floating objects with attached adults or post-veliger stages (e.g. on aquatic plants). Transport of veligers or adults by boats to upstream areas or overland to other watersheds guaran­ tees more extensive spread. Distribution of zebra mussels may be facilitated by live bait uansfers by anglers or shipments of fish eggs or young fish for fish culture. Dispersal over short distances by crayfish, tur- Jes. biros and insects (or possibly by mammals such as muskrats) should not be discounted. Since zebra mus­ sels are small and difficult to hardest, iliey are unlikely to be gathered by humans for food. Introduction of zebra mussels to North America is believed to have been about 1986. Oirough dischrgd of ballast water from a freight ship prob­ ably originating from Europe. The first report of specimens (f:om Lake St. Clair) was in June. 19SS; by 19S9 colonies of 30.000 individuals/m- were found in Lake Erie (O’Neill and MacNcill. 1989). In 1990. all the Great Lakes were reported affected and zebra mussels had progressed about 100 km up the Erie Canal into New York State (.Anon.. 1991). Spread is expected soon to the .Mississippi River system through the Chicago Diversion canal, to New England through the Erie Canal and into the Rideau-Trent-Sevem system. Because of the volume of recreational boating in this system, spread is likely to accelerate after zebra mussels become established here. Impacts The main adverse impact of zebra mussels has been as biofouling agents, encrusting inside bores of pipes and water systems, and crowing on boats, navigation buoys, fish nets and traps. Water intakes, with flowing water bringing food, provide ideal habitat for zebra mussels. Their presence jeopardizes supply of water for domestic, agricultural, industrial and fire-fighting purposes. Flow volumes and control structures and valves may be restricted by mussel populations and unpleasant tastes and odours are imparted to water supplies when zebra mussels die. \’v’hen established in pipe systems, corrosion of steel and cast iron pipes and fittings may be acceler­ ated due to waste products from zebra mussels (O’Neill and .MacNeill. 1989). Shell accumulations from dead mussels also may interfere with valves and screens and the sharp shells could become a beach hazaid. Dieoff of zebra mussels in large numbers may cause aesthetic problems in waterfront recreational areas. Cooling systems in outboard and inboard boat motors, arid in indusuial and thermal power pro­ ducing plants, may be clogged by zebra mussels. In 1990. Ontario Hydro spent over SIO million on zebra mus­ sel control (Anon. 1990). Ecological impacts of this biologi­ cal pollutant arc wide ranging, includ­ ing: • dc.nsc zebra mussel populations may act to encourage parasites whose definitive hosts are valuable waterfowl or fish species, or possibly man (Combes and Lc Brun. 1990) • because of the capacity to filter large amounts of water, plank­ ton populations may be severe­ ly reduced - in Lake Erie trans­ parency increased 85 % and phytoplankton decreased 43 % from 1988 to 1989 (J. Leach, pers. comm.) ^ • fish spawning beds on firm substrates may be colonized by mussels, reducing spawning success or survival • zebra mussels may encrust crayfish and native mussel and clxm species • because zebra mussel pseudo- faeces may bind nutrients in a form that slow s recycling with­ in the system, overall produc­ tivity may be significantly reduced; in some places e.xicn- sive accumulations of pseudo- faeces have encouraged growUl of rooted aquatic macrophytes • populations of some species of fish (e.g. carp) and waterfowl may be encouraged by avail­ ability of large numbers of zebra mussels, and in turn cause unwanted displacements and changes • with few natural predators and the capacity to occupy sites not normally colonized by other species, zebra mussels appear have few limits to development and perpetuation of large popu­ lations. In addition to the above and addi­ tional unpredictable problems, most practical conuol methods to reduce adverse impacts of zebra mussels also arc likely to cause direct or indirect environmental effects. The capacity for zebra mussels to improve water transparency and convert organic compounds to less toxic materials may be advantageous in some circum- siajices. Control Methods A wide range of biological, physi­ cal and mechanical mctliods to control zebra mussels have been tested or considered. No practical bioconirol agent has been documented but fine screens and mechanical scraping have been used in some situations. continued on page 3 BioLine Vol, 10 No. 1 ... from page 7 Treatments using chlorine and molluscicidcs and use of hot w aier (45'C to 55*C for at least 10 minutes) or pressure have been more extensive. Repetitive treatments, often several times each year, arc required. Concern about excessive use of chlorine (including possible production of ixi- halomeiliane compounds) and its dis­ charge to the environment further complicates control. A number of chemicals (some natural products) are being researched to kill zebra mussels or for application as aniifouiing coai- ines. Risks to British Columbia Zebra mussels have not been reported in .^ itish Columbia waters, but no-systematic search has begun. E^lydetcctic ■* will be very difficult and iltc experience in Uie Great Lakes demonstrates that containment will be nearly impossible if the initial popula ­ tions have reached reproductive ace. How could zebra mussels get to western provinces and states? At this time I am not aware of any national or international legislation or regulation to discourage either deliberate or acci ­ dental spread of zebra mussels. The present federal Canadian guidelines for discharge of ballast water by oceangoing vessels are not mandatory. Transport of recreational and commer ­ cial boats across Canada (or into British Columbia or other provinces from lire United States) is unregulated. Discharge of ballast water into fresh­ water areas in Fraser Port. Puget Sound (and Lake Washington) and the Columbia River ports could repeat the Great Lakes experience. Even uans- port and dumping of an aquarium or bail container containing live veligers or adult zebra mussels could cause a rapid change in the present distribu­ tion picture. Boat hulls, anchors, outboard motors (uicludi.ng hidden parts of the cooling systems), scuba equipment and floatplane pontoons are places where zebra mussels may attach (or "British Columbia waters are at risk and the environ- mental and nuisance conse ­ quences of zebra .'nussel introduction are significant." veligers may survive). Transfer of zebra mussels by uailcrcd boat (crJy a three day drive to British Columbia lakes from Ontario) appears to be Uie most likely method of spread. s:ncc adult mussels may survive out of water for up to two weeks in cool, wet weather conditions (Anon. 1989). Wet wells of most large' boats provide suitable locations for .tdults or veligers to survive in the shade and out of sight. British Columbia waters are at risk and the environmental and nuisance consequences of zebr.a mussel intro- duv ..on arc sicruficant. There appear to be few narural characteristics limn­ ing massixe expansion of zebra mus­ sels in many British Columbia lakes; conditions arc especi-iiy f.avorable m watersheds draining the Rocky Mountains because of hich calcium W levels. The interlaced nciw-orks of ri\ ers linking British Columbia lakes and reserx’oirs and widespread movement of boating equip.ment will ensure rapid spread from iruual B. C. populations. During 1980 and 1981. the Eurasian water mjlfoil public information cam ­ paign (with roadside check stations at coastal and interior British Columbia locations) inspected over 33.000 boats in summer months. Of these. 731 boats originated from provinces cast of Alberta, representing 2 2 ^ of the total (Dove and Taylor. 1982). Boatfs criginaung .''rein tlic U. S. and .Alberta consututed over 3 and 25 ‘x respec­ tively. These statistics indicate the high degree of boater mobility in Western Canada . Since tlte water supplies ">f nearly half of the population of British Columbia originate in resen oLrs. lakes ajid rivers, the prese.nce of zebra mus­ sels in these sources xvill increase costs to protect quality and ensure unimerrupted delivery. Irrigation and drainage systems and pumps also are likely to be affected. Hxdro power is the source of over 90 % of die provin­ cial electrical energy for domesiic and industrial purposes. The structures, works, tunnels and pipes associated with hydro power production arc vul­ nerable to effects of zebra mussels. Estimates of the costs of coping with zebra mussels in the eastern part of North .America range from S 5 to 10 billion. What Is Beintz Done? The present focus of research aciniiy on zebra mussels in .North .America is on the Great Lakes, where valuable research has been ongoing for several >cars. Some information from .North .America is beginning to appear in scientific publications but most literature now- m print is based on European research. The main burden of Canadian work has been assumed by the Province of Ontario (Ministry of Natural Resources and Ontario Hydro) and their focus must be to control impacts and reduce spread w iihin their jurisdiction. Since the scope of the zebra mussel problem clearly is inter­ national and tnterprovincial, a large role by federal agencies might have been expected. However, zebra mus­ sels appear to be a low priority for federal agencies; ^mall amounts of funding have been allocated recently to federal research on this problem at the Burlincton N^klLI laboratorv. 8 I .JJL Spring/Summer 1991 BicLLnc Of even more concern to us and our western neighbors is the absence of any federal initiatives or planning to help reduce spread bcyoi^d the Great Lakes. The International Joint Commission has addressed the ballast water problem and there is growing pressure to prevent further ballast water introductions. U. S. agencies in the Great Lakes area and particularly die states of New York and Minnesota are csublishing task forces to address this problem. Ontario is monitoring spread of zebra mussels and coordi­ nating research on ecological impacts and control methods, as well as imple­ menting a major public information campaign targeted at boaters. Rapid zebra mussel spread appears inevitable within eastern North America, particularly through the Mississippi drainage. However, reduc­ tion of the rate of spiead may be pos­ sible and the time gained can be used to advantage to minimize adverse impacts and develop new control mea­ sures. The Province of Manitoba has ini­ tialed a public education program to help slow westward spread into Manitoba by discouraging transport by boaters (Anon. 1991). Also. .Manitoba is anticipating the probable introduc­ tion of zebra mussels by providing industries and municipal agencies which are likely to be impacted \vith updated information about zebra mus­ sels and cunent conuol methods. I am not aware of plans by other western provinces and neighboring United Slates to prepare for probable intro­ duction of zebra mussels. Management of the present prob­ lems caused by unwanted, exotic plants and animals is costly and many of their environmental impacts are dif­ ficult to determine or quantify. The ballast water introduction of zebra mussels (and several other exotic species) into the Great Lakes probably was prcvcnuble, but regulatory agen ­ cies did not respond to earlier warn­ ings. These agencies apparently lack the commitment. a.nd possibly legisla ­ tive authority, manpower and funding resources, to curb or prevent new cases. The experience of the Water Quality Branch, B. C. Minisuy of Environment, with the exotic aquatic plant Eurasian water milfoil, has demonstrated the difficulty of contain­ ing populations of this biological pol­ lutant. However, preventive efforts, including intensive control of initial infestations, suneillance surveys and public informauon, have succeeded in reducing the rate of spread (NewrcLh, 1990). No new Eurasian water milfoil populations were found in previously uninfesied lakes in British Columbia in 1989 or 1990. Management of zebra mussels may be e.vpecied to be even mere unpredictable and challeng ­ ing. In British Columbia, key agencies such as B. C. Hydro have been alerted about zebra mussels and the provincial Ministry of Environment has expressed conce.ms to federal agencies about possible spread to western Canada. However, no clear p-olicy or resource allocation has yet been deter­ mined to address this issue. British Columbia has been subject to many other deliberate and accidental intro­ ductions of biological pclluiants; we may expect more in futtuc. Acknowledgments I wish to thank Dr. J. Leach, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, and the coordinators of Zebra Mussel programs in Ontario and Manitoba and the New York State Sea Gram Cooperative Extension for pro­ viding material included in this sum­ mary. References Anonymous, 1990. Zebra Mussel Informer, Zebra Musscls-An Exotic Invader. Issue Number 1. July 1990. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. 4 pp. .AncD>Tiious. 1991. Fact Sheet. Zebra Mussels. February, 1991. Manitoba EnvironmenL 4 pp. Combes. C. and N. Le Brun. 1990. Invasions by parasites in continental Europe. IN: Biological Invasions in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin. (Eds.) F. di Castri et al. pp 2S5-296. Kluwer Academic Publishers. The .Netherlands. Dove. R. and B. Taylor. 1982 Studies on Aquatic Macrophytes, Pari XXXVI. The 1981 Aquatic Plant Quarantine Project. B. C. Nfinistry of Enviroruneni. 54 pp. Mackjc. G. L., W. N. Gibbons, B. W. Muncasier. and I. .M. Gray. 1989. The Zebra Mussel. Dreissena polymorpha'. A S>Tithcsis of European Experiences and a Preview for North America. Report prepared for Water Resources Branch. Ontario Ministry of Environment. 76 pp. plus 2 .Appendices. NewTOLh. P. R. 1990. Prevention of the Spread of Eurasian water milfoil. Proceedings. National Conference on Enhancing the States’ Lake and Welland Management Programs. Chicago. Dl. USEPA and NALMS. pp. 93-100. O’Neill. C. R.. Jr. and D. B. MacNcill. 1989. Dreissena polymorpha. An Unwelcome Nevv Great Lakes Invader. Coastal Resources Fact Sheet. Date 11-1989. New York Sea Grant Extension Program. 10 pp. P. R. NewTOth. Ph. D.. R. P. Bio. Manager Littoral Resources Unit Water Quality Branch Ministry of Environment Victoria. B. C. □ , How to I Ideniify it ^t’hrxi iflf harnjtlr iii. ..i, -1 /us set dollar (hrr.ii to indu,rri * 'nuliihj/hon --I /rrt mav hecnmr^a waier «■^-sssifT' ‘^asfss j"gi Jl 'ign ’P'»i >. o„, p''-'' "> iJrr an "wlif) l„n, n.,.___fecKeTcSr /o Oo P'(h iv3(,7 .... urrpi algae « ■!>«PKCTtaPJ'‘''■»'»fc„...« ^ Ibfc? mu'ss^i wifhs:riafr^tear..II jijc warpf; ^ I 6^'/'^'Sivaltr^65.. ,4, (ash ''''■«-^tiiun i .go,). t»em,on o«icr .„ Du/uh, (“i J'g Jl r <.fWi«„„,|„, ,, iWm V p*03%HM IIPTi S'C ' r-’rr 4^ • n .V- .v 4>;.i;\ ■ • >S * !>v^ ^^Illllllllig ' [ /u>: v-m* ip 1'^, ‘ IPw m^ /y^ //i /' • C'iV/!'’2)/’^^ ^ ^/'v A'L’2) ^ X LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT WHEREAS Zebra Mussel and Eurasian water milfoil have been identified as aquatic threats to the recreational lakes in the State of Minnesota, and WHEREAS Zebra Mussel has been positively identified as existing in the Mississippi River at LaCrosse, WI, and potentially as close as St. Paul, and WHEREAS Lake Minnetonka has been infested with Eurasian water milfoil since 1987, and WHEREAS Zebra Mussel is largely spread by larvae nc visible to the unaided eye in wot areas of a boat and possibly trailer equipment, and may also spread by larvae carried in live bait containers, either from bait provided from infested waters, or water added to bait, from invested waters, by persons using and saving bait for use in uniinfested waters! and WHEREAS Eurasian water milfoil is largely spread by plant fragments carried on watercraft and trailers, and WHEREAS the widespread infestation of these exotics will be extraordinarily costly to private as well as public intr »sts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District urgently recommends implementation of - ■« .-k v-g Resolution, Zebra Mussel/Eurasian Water Milfoil Containment, 12/4/91, P. 2 an immediate state action plan to prevent the spread of Zebra Mussel and Eurasian water milfoil into Minnesota's uninfested waters considering the following: 1) Funding comprehensive public education, exotic control programs and inspection programs at all public and private accesses where infestation of Zebra Mussel or Eurasian water milfoil is known to exist, through multi-source funding mechanisms which may include: a) Special levy authorization for all cities or counties and lake improvement districts. b) Additional watercraft license surcharge: c) Inspection fee at public and private commercial accesses. 2) Immediately expanding public education, advising watercraft operators of the means by which Zebra Mussel and Eurasian water milfoil are spread, 3) Adopting stringent regulation prohibiting the taking of live bait from infested waters for private or commercial use. XXX di W4TCR5HCO ICUM041»Y ^ / MIIMiMEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT P.O. Box 387, Wayzata. Minnesota 55391 BOARD OF MANAGERS: James R. Spensley Pres • John £ Thomas • Richard R Mi;ier Robert D. Erickson • C. Woodrow Love • Clarkson Lmdiey • Thomas Maoie. Jr lAKC MIHNCTONKA L J MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT . BOARD OF MANAGERS 16 IwC)! AGENDA THE BOARD OF MANAGERS WILL NOT MEET DURING THE MONTH OF DECEMBER THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT'S BOARD OF MANAGERS IS THURSDAY, JANUARY 16, 1992 AT ST. LOUIS PARK, CITY HALL. MINUTES FROM THE NOVEMBER 21, 1991 MEETING WILL BE MAILED IN JANUARY OF 1992. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT RON QUANBECK AT 473-4224. L- i'TTi. J I ,! i . i V/ S 185 Bederwood Drive, Long Lake, Mn 55356. JAN 3 1992 1st January 1992. Reference: Public Hearing Of Municipal Sewers - Stubbs Bay Area. Orono Council Members, With reference to the above public hearing. The registered letter that I sent on the 18th of Movemiber 1991, expressing my concerns, deserves the good manners of a reply. It has been more than six weeks since this meeting and I have receiv'ed no communications from you what-sc-ever. Please address this matter. Yours faithfully Dr John Souter. I I i Janu.iTN' 1, 1992 To: From: Orono Mayor, City Council, Ron Moorse and Mike Gaffron Stephen and Linda WTiitinan and 3620 Eileen St. Maple Plain 55359 Jane and Terry' Olson 3640 Bayside Long Lake 55356 JAN 3 1992 Re:Stubbs Bay Sewer We are M:..portive of anempts to eliminate sewage contaminadon of Lake Minnetonka and therefore the Stubbs .‘"ay sewer project in general. Nevertheless, we will not support inclusion ot properties ir Me proposal which have adequate current and future sewage disposal, are not on the main trunkline . “d do not share a lateral with any propenies with inadequate systems. It is our understanding from a discussion with Mike Gaffron that the current proposal includes constructing a separate lateral off the main trunk just to accomodate our two propenies. We cannot support this approach. Both properties have fully functionning sepde systems and several alternate septic sites which we would agree to have formally evaluated and would preserve by deed restrictions. The Olson property is just under 3 acres; the Whitman property is 1.9 acres. Running this separate lateral solely to serve two properties who do not need it is not supportable from either a financial or practical perspective. We feel there is sufficient justification for e.xcluding our two properties from the final proposed map without adversely affecting the cost for the many lots which need sewer service. As you know, homeowneis can legally challenge assessments greater than tlie concommitant increase in property value. The total cost to the Whitmans would be in e.xcess of $20,000 and nearly $15,000 for the OLsons. Yet neither property would increase more than around $3000 m appraised value according to several certified appraisers with whom we have consulted. To incur $35,000 in costs, regardless of who pays, when no sewer service is wamanted for our properties cannot be justified. Furthermore since neither of us is on the main trunkline nor denves any benefit from its existetice (other than does every-one in .Minnesota who uses Lake Minnetonka), wc arc unwilling to contribute tow'ard the trunkline - unless all Orono residents do so We have written you a number of times on this issue and appeared at sever^ Council meetings to express our viewpoint. We have contacted Mike Gaffron to express our willingness to cooperate with site surveys, soil samples and deed restrictions. We await further word trom you, Mike regarding the next steps we should take. Out of respect for the mayor and council members’ privacy and busy schedules we have chosen not to telephone you regarding our concerns. We are counting on your careful consideration of the facts w'e've laid out, and are optimistic you will support our exclusion from the sewer project. ■*■ V.f 4 1-542 (9)1 . ' SJl^ (M)(13) -----------& hr\ UJ Q. 1^ (45) 1 (46) [ (47) 1 1 (49)(50) MH-SSt M^SS2 1 SEC|3ND 1 STP|EET 1 v:.. 1#^ juMi/emupt^ lT-1! fM* ..:..I ofTKwoirr *“ /.“imm tlkil. <M. Atrtt Gttrrymi mr i ntf tt>r ..rC*r stA«, uMtaMM C... _ . •M>niirAtiMM» M«k *MMNk Li. i ^ /I-* . imi ne. o^z zrK : niTti:: /v»zK /»,4 % 1 s». 4 vM. •/;; ^s,i 9i . At 2| ca»*«ir iiD i4^i|b . . f. •CKr«Mi. W. MAt. iMiLff ____ . .. . l»'s»««AML4MMAM»Ar> ____ ----------$>AA,nuOtW.il IM.M. ------------ MAW «M«« /N MAC# ,________ -------- - AW •n<P«.fWA*0»AUtW«N». (. -SAa# *i It, aw Z -m zm !• "gtwt.At ________ -----------------^--------------J^tlwsik- #. " S*AA M f, AOAW A*L VI AlMW| A4«4Mta«>tfi MCA. /rv :/7.r% 3.1' 1 1.1*f^.1% “rir ■/4.7% V i.f*: . . ZA»v: -/Cl% A.3% A>»ii4.3r. /r.4n i».L% VW1 »jC." ‘tir.4% /r.4X VK^r. 10% 50.4%: wi ir fi.o •/. ^.0% vr.0% jrtf,jL^>i4% 4 % i^.4 % ViH tf: air; 4 % /5^.(r*4 iiz.i%viiwi:^i.- 9Li>r;-: %.o/. vj.t% iViiVC «i.v •/: TA v--? IV------------------------------ ;;j ■:; ;, zfzZZ ZZZZ ■ -W -- !»- - tn:::z^Ez:“ “(D rif z2:n::MiWK^-- 4i- ir E BB 41^ --® ^ ^»ll l»— •«■«■ Ei-'- ±L VJ w-i-?------ fM»li MC«>. ■T *-l ~ :i »i ftriuiT * fa" 7s.tn>‘ ftf sLAti *«►..rnT (^« 3yr)-ft>st« ♦le»?»o« t/fto i (y^I xr * '■ «7.yV?-^' ^«,5T ^^£>0 ' ■ * ^lU •**h 6*^ D^scm^nmAf pm «««wMnMk to« i* •hUm i. immhi* U1Mm«Ii, tmm ts. «Mt fnl 1^?***t?*^”^***^ **»*<*■"♦ Wiwpto CaS^Tmimmou, dMcrCid m 1a tlw But taction I, 37«.n Cuti thoncn A m Mut at rioht anglu 4SS.3 Cut ts th« Mtial poliife oC taafimlng ot tlw tract to ba «aeritaadi thanoo oontlnulng duo Hut tt faatt IhMca dua North 140.7 faat aora or lots to tha Southarly riwro •aoinnlna at aatndar cosnu No. S7 « tha tauth'aido of HuuoU Bay It llna of aaid taction Bi thanea South on tho But Una of uid haaatarly along tha Southarly Aora oC Itaai^l tay Aoa Itarth tan tha aetu^ pota oC bagimlngi thmoa o< WnoiiU tayt thmea to a polat la a llna dsM daa toBkh 1S3.7 faat n«a or Irha to tha aetaal paliit of hagliwiiin. Pto tha parpoaa at this taartation tta Baat llna of aaidSaetlan • ia ooMidacod to bo a dw North and Nenlh llna. tafathar atth an iaiaitat for drlaway payoou evar that part of Oowannnnt lot 1, faction S, ‘BaoMhlp 117, llingo 23, tamopin Ooonty, Htwioaoto, daocrlbrt aa follouai taflmlng at nawiflir eomar Ho. S7 on tha South aida of Hnanll Nay In tha tut llna of aaid Saetton S; thanea South along tha tart Una of aaid taotion S, 37S.3S Sarti thanea dua Mart at right wplaa 447.S fort to tha actual uAMt of baglmlng of tha trart be ba daaerlbadi thnaa du South SS.OStati thanea toaSh 11 dagnu, 47 atnutu as.U faati thanea South IS dagrau, 37 adartao loot 71 tart nora or Ion be a pota In tha Northarly riSht of aay Una of Oeonty Noad No. Sli thanea Seathinrtarty along aaid Northarly rl#t of wy llna IS.l fartt thanea North 12 dagroao, 37 adnataa NOrt 73.SS farti thanea North 11 dapnn, 47 ninitn But 21S.IS fartt thanea daa North S3.0S fort naaa or laaa be a p^ in t llna taMi duo NBrt tan tha aebual point of boglanlngt thanea dua Bart IS fart bo tha aetaal point of baglnnlag. Nor tha purpoaa of this daeorlption tha But Una of oaddlaebien S la oenaidarad bo ba a dua North and taulh Una. a • tUOOO BTAKB aiACtOa.u.- BSAIMNOSON AtSUMSOOhTUM O ■mONMON.SCT PNC POSBO MFONMATION ------------IMPtOORBLEV. NASCMSNTtLBV. a-mOf4MON.IM>LACB • DNAINAQB 000.0 • SWST. SLEV. (ooao/< PNOfOSEO ELEV .OANAQB PLOON ELSV. . TON OtOCK ELEV. SCHOBORQ I LAND ^URVEYiNQ MNNA.MN nm 1 hereby certMy UM Uila plen, turvey or report wet prepared by me or under my direci tupervltlan and Ihel 1 em a duly Regleierod Und Surveyor under H«e lewa ol tho Slate joaa 3 BoolfPaeo 20*30 Dale: AU »# ttSt------^ Reolitrallon No. 14700 Scato )"«50' cy/i/s ^e/^jaey m■ ■ . . : '^^■ ; ■ is •• . 4 cwMr 1I - w^»t 6ACX> ilw ■omh rtJB cTiiMtiiu Wg «n «l« Mat llM o< mM ** •«**« •* towMi* nuMiii. MMfa n. Ntat la tha Mat llaa aC aal4 •aetlan ti ttanea i ?!2!?"_!l ***** •* •• <**•> *«M to thaaeboil eC ba gliwiiiT a( tha tiaet to bo fcorrihotly ttwiao oBatiaolao «w IM « Caaty thnea dao Naath I40.Y foot aara or laoo ta tha fcmharly Moca of IhaMBll l^fy -------------------- . - - —r«£Ss^S^-3rs£-|i»|ioaa of thta jMirrlftlow tha Mat llaa at aalii iaetioB lla obm a daa Math aad Moth eaar that port of taba tha Math alda of WaaiaU My la tha Mat llaa aC aal4 MetloB ly thnea Math alanv tha Mat llaa of aaid iaetlaa t, 37f.lS faaty thnea Mo Mot at al^b aailaa M7.I feat ta the aetaal aalat of bo«lflala« of tha tiaet ta bo aneelhafy thenoa faa Math la.oifMy thnoa Math 11 Mfnn, 47 auoitn Mat ni.M Maty thaaoa Math 12 Mvian. J7 alaatao Mat 71 feat aeca or laoa to a pelat la tha Mithoaly HMt aC aigr llaa of OaaMr Mai M. fly thma twa hae terty aleai aali itoBthai^ right of aay llaa 11.1 Maty thnn Math U Mbrno, 37 afantao Mat TJ.IS faaty thnea Math 11 Mgnoa, 47 alaetae Mat 211.11 faaty thnea Ma Mcth U.Of feat aeca or laao ta a gelM la a llaa Mm Mo Mat feea tha aetual galat at baglnilagy thnea Ma Mat IS foot to tha aetaal aalat of bogliBiiai. Mr tha gaapeoa of thla Maerigtlea tha Mat llaa of aali Paetiea I la aaaatMtai ta ba a Mo Math aal Math Urn. • •mONMON.flT a.MONMON.ItMACI - BAtaiiOMT OLBV. *'Tt11!fmfLtV ->-OHAiy*AOt OOOO-EXIST. ILEV. («0.0t^ ntOfOSCO BLEV. EXIST. tlHOh.Ei.EV. cun/s se/^j^iey ^ SCHOBORQ UNOiuWEYINQ 1 horaty cortHy Mat Otto pin. tufvty or itporl wot praparaa ty NW or untftr my dlrrct tiipo'vltlon and Hmi 1 am a OMy haalalafea Land Sorvayor undar tha laws ol tha Slala aflMnoM - JOSf 3 ■oeli-Paga Z0'30 OntaM^MNlSn Mt« i?i# a# iff/------^ naglstralion No. 14T00 Seala l"*30'