Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-26-1993 Council Packetf COUNCIL MINUTES 04/26/93 # i % ik MINUTES OF A REGULAR OROMO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 26, IL'93 ROLL The Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Edward Callahan, Counciimembers J. Diann Goetten, Gabriel Jabbour, Charles Kelley and JoEllen Hurr. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, City Engineer Gienn Cook, City Attorney Kevin Staunton, and City Recorder Teri Naab. Mayor Callahan called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. («1) CONSENT AGENDA Kelley added Item #16. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 5, nays 0. Motions for all items adopted by consent agenda will be Included in the minutes in their respective numerical order. Mayor Callahan read the resolutions prociaiming Older Americatis Month and a resolution proclaiming Westonka Senior Center Week May 3-7. He congratuiated the Westonka Senior Center and the Tamarack Senior Center on their recognition. Goetten noted she had recently attended an event where both organizations were present, at which she had an enjoyable afternoon. She said she was very thankful for their many hours of service to the Community. (*#2) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve the minutes of the regular Council meeting held April 12, 1993. Ayes 5, nays 0. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Hurr reported the LMCD has funded a boating study, which Indicates usage Is down from 1986 and 1937, but similar to 1984. Goetten felt that may be due to the impact of the drought. Jabbour felt it was mostly due to the colder weathet last summer and economic issues. MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 26, 1993 LMCD REPORT - CONT. Kelley asked if the study includes a survey of users of the public access and where they came from. Hurr noted the study would indicate within a certain mileage where users came from. Jabbour reported the fish'ng contest was hjid last weekend and there were 88 boats parking on County and City streets, 21 boats In Gayles Marina, and 73 parked at North Arm landing. He presented pictures of garbage left at the landing, and felt the County should replace the garbage containers that were removed this year. He suggested the City remove the trash and bill the County. Kelley noted the 'ssue of garbage containers has been brought up with regard to the Maxwell Bay landing. Jabbour stated he knows there is a lot of abuse with people dumping garbage from home at public locations, but felt that it was their responsibility to provide areas fov disposal at public locations. Goetten noted this Issue has been discussed at the Lake Use Committee meetings and some felt there should be containers. She said she also felt they should provide a container for the mil foil removed from boats and trailers. She suggested monitoring the situation at the landing this summer to detertiiine how they wish to handle the situation at Maxwell Bay. Jabbour suggested providing collars on the containers not allowing larger ite'iis to be dumped in. Hurr feic I terns too large would just be left next to the container. She felt they should monitor the situation of no garbage cans for one year before making a decision. Kelley suggested .'emoving the can for recyclables also. Hurr agreed that would be best. Mayor Cal'ahan directed staff to contact the County to have the trash rei<ioved from the landing. Jabbour agreed that they should monitor the situation, and if it does not get better, replace garbage containers at the public landing areas. ^ MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 26, 1993 LMCD REPORT - CONT. Jabbour reported he has not received a response to his letter sent to LMCD members discussing Orono’s concerns. Mayor Callahan reported at a Metropolitan Council meeting he overheard the Park Board asking for approval of property for the new park. In the proposal one paragraph contained language similar to such, "not prepared to handle boating" and "the Park Board and the LMCD agreed to reduce the number of parking spaces from 100 to 80, reducing anticipated boat visitors from 40,000 to 33,000 to the park". He Inquired about the agreement between the Park Board and the LMCD and the statement that they are not prepared to handle boating. Hurr noted the LMCD has not approved any such agreement and she has not seen any proposals for docks. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#3) 4M808 JAMES ABRAHAMSON, 4630 TONKAVIEW LANE - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3272 Mr. and Mrs. Abrahamson were present. Mabusth explained the applicant seeks an area variance as the property Is in a one acre zoning district and this property contains .74 acres. There are houses located on the lots to the east and north. During an earlier variance review, the City developed an access easement to serve this property. The proposed residence meets all required setbacks. Hurr noted an error on Page 1 of the resolution Indicating there is additional land available. Mabusth said that had been corrected. Abrahamson questioned the address. Mabusth stated the address has been changed to reflect a Tonkavlew Lane address. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3272 for Application #1808 James Abrahamson, 4630 Tonkaview Lane, approving an area variance to allow construction of a new residence. Ayes 5, nays 0. 1 " } minutes of a regular orono council meeting HELD APRIL 26, 1993 (#4) #1809 DANIEL AND BARBARA HOFFMAN, 1135 HERITAGE LANE - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3273 Ml and Mrs. Hoffman were present. Mabusth explained the applicants seek setback variances to reconstruct their home which was destroyed by fire. All lots In this development are substandard In size, similar to this lot. The new residence will be placed at the same setbacks as the former residence. The proposal is well below the hardcover limitations. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution #3273 for Application #1809 Daniel and Barbara Hoffman, 1135 Heritage Lane, approving setback variances to construct a new residence. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#5^ #1813 LEONARD NISKA, 2304/2308 SHADYWOOD ROAD - SUBFIVISION OF PRIVATE EASEMENT - RESOLUTION #3274 Mabusth explained the original appIication was presented as an easement request in an attempt to resolve a 7 encroachment of the corner of the residence. All conditions of a previous conditional use permit approval have been met. The Planning Commission was not comfortable with a pernr .‘lent easement, so they strongly encouraged the applicant to consider a lot line rearr" )gement. The applicant and the adjacent property owner have agreed to the equal trading of property. Mayor Callahan asked If this Includes the approval of the setback variance. Mabusth stated the approval resolution does not address the variance nor did the Planning Commission recommendation address the issue of a setback variance. Staunton Inquired If there was variance approval for the construction of the residence. Mabusth stated the residence was constructed prior to zoning standards. Jabbour felt the variance should also be addressed at this time. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Hurr, to adopt Resolution #3274 for AppIication #1813 Leonard Niska, 2304/2308 Shadywood Road, for a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement and setback variance. Ayes 5, nays 0. i MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 26, 1993 (»#6) MARINA LICENSE It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to accept the information presented regarding 1993 Marina License Applications. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*#7) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT #3 UPDATE It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to accept the information presented on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 3. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*«8) CITY OF MEDINA - SHORELAND FLEXIBILITY REQUEST It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to direct staff to send a brief letter to the City of Medina and the DNR indicating that Orono has no problems with Medina’s request for flexibili y from the State-wide Shoreland Standards. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*»9) SHORELAND ORDINANCES UPDATE It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to accept the information presented regarding Shoreland Ordinances Update. Ayes 5, nays 0. Hurr reported ground water and other environmental issues may be channeled through the Environmental Committee, which she chairs. Kelley asked what types of Issues the Environment Committee deals with. Hurr replied mil foil and water quality. She reported on the water quality testing program. The Information gathered will be fea into the PCA’s computer system. Jabbour found It exciting to see such a diversity of Interested parties In this program. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT A) Mayor Callahan expressed regret that Jeff Johnson has submitted his resignation from the Planning Commission. B) Mayor Callahan suggested mailing or publishing the letter from the Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission explaining rates. r W h •\ • MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 26, 1993 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. C) Mayor Callahan reported that the Policy Committee held a meeting with MnDot to discuss the status of MnDot’s activities relating to the project. It was reported that a corridor selection would not be reached until mid-1995. MnDot’s representative noted the Land Use and Economic Impact Study has not even begun, and MnDOT would hire a consultant to do so. He indicated MnDot presented a description of the bid to be sent out and Orono representatives added to that description focusing on the actual results of the development along each corridor. He noted the Mayor of Long Lake generally supported Orono's position. At the next meeting they will again review the refined specifications of the bid. Kellay asked who the consultant is that the Land Use Committee would be hiring, and expressed concern that it might be a former MnDot employee, which would not be in the best Interest of the City. Mayor Callahan Judged the bids would be sent to various people and they would have some Input on the selection. ENGINEER’S REPORT (#10) APPROVAL OF PLANS - BIKE TRAIL Mayor Callahan understood they would not proceed with this project until Council held a work session, because of the high cost of approximately $300,000 on a trail which normally would cost much I ess. Jabbour noted the engineering plans are acceptable, but he would like to see the contract with Hennepin Parks. Kelley reiterated he would like to have some assurances that all the trees along Old Crystal Bay Road between Highway 12 and Watertown Road will not be cleared. He said he would like to see the trail staked in this area. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to table this matter until a work session has been held. Cook suggested prior to the work session taking a tour of the proposed route. Mayor Callahan reported he is concerned about the curb and gutter aspect of the proposal. 6 i MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 26, 1993 BIKE TRAIL - CONT. Flint noted the issues to be amended In the contract are not substantive, and indicated the urgency to proceed with this project. A work session was scheduled for Wednesday, May 5, 1993 at 7:30 a.m. with a tour to be taken at the beginning of the session. Vote: Ayes 5, nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#11) APPOINTMENT TO PARK COMMISSION Jabbour reported he has worked with Jim White with regard to a park on Big Island and felt White believes in Orono’s philosophy, and even tried to impress that philosophy upon Hennepin Parks with this Issue. He felt some members may feel White is too ambitious. Hurr feit White would be a negative with regard to Hennepin Parks. Kelley felt he was a bit ambitious. Goetter stated White has been very helpful to the City when dealing with Hennepin Parks, and she thought that was Important. She felt both candidates were good. Kelley noted the difference between philosophies between the City and County. Jabbour noted this Is a difficult decision because so many qucMfled candidates have applied. Hurr felt Orono’s Park Commission Is rather low keyed. She Indicated the perception of Hennepin Parks around the lake is negatIve. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to appoint James White to the Park Commission to expire on December 31, 1994. Ayes 3, nays 2. Hurr and Kelley voted nay. (*•12) PROCLAMATION - MAY AS OLDER AMERICANS MONTH ~ RESOLUTION • 3275 It *»as moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution •3275 proclaiming Older Americans Month. Ayes 5, nays 0. MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 26, 1993 (*#13) PROCLAMATION - WEbfONKA SENIOR CENTER WEEK, MAY 3-7, 1S93 - RESOLUTION #3276 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3276 proclaiming Westonka Senior Center Week May 3-7, 1993. Ayes 5, nays 0. (»#14) SALARY REVIEW - LIN VEE DEPUTY CLERK It was moved by Jabbour, seconded jy Goetten, to adjust Lin Vee’s Level to 4, Step IV ($12.683/hr) effective April 23, 1993. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*#15) BOARD OF REVIEW - THURSDAY, APRIL 29, 1993 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to acce,'t the information presented regarding the Board of Review. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*#16) ESTABLISH A WORK SESSION TO REVIEW PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to schedule a work session to review Planning Commission applicants for Thursday, April 29 at 7:30 a.m. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#17) ESTABLISH A WORK SESSION TO MEET WITH THE HIGHWAY 12 MEDIATOR A work session to meet with the Highway 12 mediator was scheduled for Thursday, May 6, 1993 at 3:30 p.m. (*#18) LICENSES It was moved by Jabbour, following ■icenses: seconded by Goetten, to approve the Septic System Installers:Hayes Excavating McCarty Water & Waste Garbage Haulers:Blackowiak & Son Sanitation Rolloff Service Cleanway Sanitation, Inc. Ayes 5, nays 0. 8 •i * • |»Mr MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 26, 1993 (*#19) BILLS It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, of the All Funds Account. Ayes 5, nay 0. to approve payment ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by regular Orono City Council at 8:26 p.m. Goetten, to adjourn the AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, APRIL 26, 1993, 7:30 I,M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (*)Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by cne motion by the City Council under the Consent Item*^ on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. ROLL CALL wenMniia 1. CONSENT AGENDA* APPROVAL OF MINUTES* 2. Regular Meeting of April 12, 1993 APR 2 6 1993 CITY OF ORONO PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT - J.^Ellen Hiarr Representative PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT ** APPLICANTS **Immediately after the Council has reviewed your application please sign the three (3; original resolutions at the Recorder's desk. Applicants need not execute resolutions for subdivisions, vacations and denials 3 4 *6 *7 *8 * 9 #1808 James Abrahamson, 4630 Tonkaview Lane, Variance - Resolution #1809 Daniel and Barbara Hoffman, 1135 Heritage Lane - Va- iances - Resolution ^ #1813 Leonard Niska, 2304/2308 Shadywood Roaa - Subdivision of Private Easement - Resolution Marina License Comprehensive Plan Amendment #3 Update City of Medina - Shoreland Flexibility Request Shoreland Ordinances Update MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT ENGINEER REPORT 10. Approval of Plans - Bike Trail CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 11. Appointment to Park Commission *12. Proclamation - May as Older Americans Month - Resolution •13. Proclamation - Westonka Senior Center Week, May 3-7,1993 Resolution *14. Salary Review - Lin Vee Deputy Clerk AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, APRIL 26, 1993, 7:30 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL "HAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA CITY ADMINISTRATOR';. REPORT Continued *15 Board of Review - Thursday, April 29, 1993 16* Establish a Work Session to Review Planning Commission Applicants 17! Establish a Work Session to Meet with the Highway 12 Mediator CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT LICE! BILLS (19*) adjournment * INFORMATION 1 EMS INCLUDED IN COUNCIL PACKET UPCOMINGhISSTOS - S:30 p.m. Orono Council Chambers ■ Council meeting 7:30 p.m. ^ • 1993 Board of Review meeting 7:30 p.m. Orono Council Chambers • Orono Clean Up Lay - Saturday 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. • Park Commission 7:15 p.m. • Orono Clean Up Day - Saturday 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. • Council meeting 7:30 p.m. • Planning Commission 7:00 p.m. « . School Board Election Day - No Public Meetings Until 8:0* p.m. • Council meeting - 7:30 p.m. • Monday Holiday - Memorial Day Obsejr/ance 04/26 04/29 05/01 05/04 05/08 05/10 05/17 05/18 05/24 05/31 Planning Coirinission Council PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)i.DDRESS NAME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) rAid- [!! \i . ... U.' ^ l AO ■> • 2. rniVd / ( i \ . .• Ca • 1 ic <-*v'rv4 ,'1 kf^ 4 . \ iv / KniY'V^A K!> rr. -------------------------------------^ 'iCiA (■/^. iq 5 ?\a i!2 U i ■^50 6. 7. 8 . 9. 0. 1. 2. 3. 4 . • • 6. 7. 8. 9. • • COUNGILMBIM APR 2 6 1993 cmroFORONO MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 12, 1993 ROLL The Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Edward Callahan, CounciImembers J. Diann Goetten, Gabriel Jabbour and Charles Kelley. JoEllen Hurr arrived at 7:42 p.m. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, City Engineer Glenn Cook, City Attorney Kevin Staunton, and City Recorder Ter I Naab. Charles Schroeder was present to represent the Planning Commission. Mayor Callahan called the meeting to order at 7:32 P.M. (*#1) PROCLAMATION HEALTH FAIR 11 - RESOLUTION #3255 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3255 proclaiming Health Fair 11 Day. Ayes 4, nays 0. Mayor Callahan explained the event and read the proclamation resolution. He congratulated the Orono students graduating from the DARE program and thanked the Pol Ice Department for their help with the program. (#2) CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Callahan added Items #1 and 17. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 4, nays 0. Motions for all Items adopted by consent agenda will be Included In the minutes In their respective numerical order. (*#3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve the minutes of the regular Council meeting held March 22, 1993. Ayes 4, nays 0. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Hurr. to reconsider approval of the March 22, 1993 minutes. Ayes 5, nays 0. Hurr noted she was misquoted on Page 15, Paragraph 1, and asked that the second sentence of that parag»'aph be deleted. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Hurr, to approve the minutes of the regular Council meeting held March 22, 1993 as .imended. Ayes 5, nays 0. 1 f *' f MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 12, 1993 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#4) #1298 VACATION OF FOREST BOULEVARD Hurr arrived at 7:42 p.m. - RESOLUTIONS #3256-#3262 Mabusth explained this application has been under consideration over the past 5 years. Last month the Courci I approved the vacation application for the Ryans (one of the original 10 applicants). The first phase of the vacation of Forest Boulevard for eight property owners was approved by Council In May of 1988. During the second application Nelson questioned the issue of access to his property. At the time the City vacated Oak Place, it failed to maintain access to Nelson’s residence and an easement over sewer lines. Easements will now be necessary over four properties, of which one owner Is not willing to grant such easement. It Is recommended Council approve vacation of the remaining parcels Included In this application as the vacation will have no Impact on the Nelson situation. Jabbour questioned why the process has taken so long and encouraged staff to expedite the process. Mabusth stated this issue is not a legal matter. in the hands of staff, but rather It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolutions vacating an unused portion of Forest Boulevard within the plat of Saga Hill Revised as follows: #3256 Kellen, 1435 Park Drive; #3257 Hodges, 1447 Park Drive; #3258 Frieler, 1331 North Arm Drive; #3259 Denzel, 1295 Elmwood Avenue; #3260 Perkins, 1265 Elmwood Avenue; #3261 Howells, 1423 Park Drive; and #3262 Regnier, 1205 Elmwood Avenue. Ayes 5, nays 0. (««5) #1771 JAMES MARKOE, 340 NORTH ARM LANE - FINAL SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION #3263 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3263 for Application #1771 James Markoe, 340 North Arm Lane, approving the plat of Markoe Addition. Ayes 4, nays 0. (»#6) «1781/#1782 DAVID CARLSON, 620 BIG ISLAND - VARIANCE/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3264 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution •3264 for Applications #1781/#1782 for David Carlson, 620 Big Island, approving a variance to allow a seasonal dwelling to be constructed In front of the average lakeshore setback line and a conditional use permit to allow such construction within the flood plain. Ayes 4, nays 0. MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 12, 1993 (#«7) #1783/#1784 DAVID CARLSON, 610 BIG ISLAND - VARIANCE/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3265 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3265 for Applications #1783/#1784 for David Carlson, 610 Big Island, approving a variance to allow a seasonal dwelling to be constructed In front of the average setback line, and a conditional use permit to allow such construction within the flood plain. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*#8) #1785 DAVID CARLSON, 610/620 BIG ISLAND - FINAL SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION #3266 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3266 for Application #1785 for David Carlson, 610/620 Big Island, approving the plat of Island Pointe. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*#9) #1795 LUANN WALTERS, 3800 WAYZATA BOULEVARD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3267 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3267 for Application #1795 for LuAnn Walters, 3800 Wayzata Boulevard, granting a conditional use permit for a day care use. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#10) #1804 MICHAEL REVIER, 2691 ETHEL AVENUE - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3268 Mabusth explained the applicant seeks an average Iakeshore setback variance for a proposed house to be located completely In front of the average lakeshore setback line, which has been determined based on an adjoining lot that Is platted with a narrow corridor to the lakeshore. The former residence located on the property was also in front of the average setback line. She reported Mr. Amundson, the moat impacted neighbor, has no concerns. She indicated that in a recent conversation with Mr. Kauffman, neighboring owner to the southeast across the narr*^w corridor lot, that If h s house were used to determine the average setback line there would be no need for the variance. Mr. Kauffman had concern about the proximity of the proposed driveway to the lot line, and the applicant has proposed plantings along the lot line to screen the tJ® Runkles, adjoining property owners to the north of the subject lo , are In strong opposition to the project. MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 12, 1993 ZONING FILE #1804 - CONT. Rollie Crawford, attorney for Mr. and Mrs. Runkle, expressed that his clients are in opposition to the variance. He testified that the ordinances are in place to protect citizens, and the Courts will uphold that principle. He continued that the Courts however wi I I uphold variances to such if certain criteria is met. Variances cannot be granted duo to self imposed hardships or for economic, aesthetic or design reasons. He submitted that If the ordinance were upheld the property would not be rendered useless. He presented that the former home was setback substantially on the lot and the applicant was aware of the ordinances at the time of purchase of the lot. He said the applicant requests approximately a 100* variance, which Is not incidental but rather a major variance. He felt the intent of the ordinance is to protect the lake views of existing residences and that it would be best to locate the home as far back as possible on the property. He submitted that the Impact on the Runkle home will be substantial as the proposed residence will tower above their home. He said this variance violates the planning policies of the City and past Supreme Court decisions. The Zoning Administrator has suggested a possible hardship may be the additional grading and excavation needed elsewhere on the property. He felt this was not an acceptable hardship as the previous home was located further back on the property. He recommended denial of*the variance or revision to the proposal to minimize the impact. Mayor Callahan stated three Council members were present at the Planning Commission during the Initial review and heard comments from the Runkles. Amundson said this proposal allows him better views than with the previous home. He stated following the Planning Commission meeting, the Runkles made no attempt to contact him for a meeting. He questioned if this issue Is so important to them, why they would not make an attempt to contact him. Mabusth noted at the time the Kauffman residence was built, the former residence on this lot was used to draw the average setback line rather than the Amundson home. If the Amundson home site was used, the Kauffman house would have been located In front of the average lakeshore setback line. Hurr Inquired about the extent of the variance. Mabusth suggested the 100* variance from the average setback line is to the front of the residence, and the proposal meets the 75* lakeshore setback. MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 12, 1993 ZONING FILE #1804 - CONT. Hurr said she could not support a variance to this degree. Mabusth explained that up until 5 or 6 years ago, lots with platted corridors were not considered when determining average setback Iines. Jabbour felt the corridor platted to the lake renders the entire lot unbulldable. He stated that by today’s standards the City would never plat a lot like 2697 Ethel Avenue with a platted corridor to the lake. The former platting creates the hardship. He felt the ordinance intends to protect the views of adjacent properties, and those most affected do not have a problem with the proposal, and the contour of the lake makes this proposal totally outside of the parameter of the Runkle house. He added the applicant Is trying to build at a 943-950’ elevation, and if they are forced to adhere to the average setback o^'dinance, they would push the house to be built at a 960’ elev-cion which would increase the elevation by 15’ . Mabusth reiterated the Planning Commission felt that they must deal with the current view situation, and as there are no view windows In the Runkle home that are adjacent to this lot as this area of their house Is a garage The Planning Commission found there was no Impact on lake views from windows of the residence. Goetten stated she was surprised they were using the platted corridor lot to determine the average setback line. She felt they were not denying or diminishing the views of the Runkles. Kelley felt this Is a buildable lot and the line should be drawn using the Kauffman house. He noted the ordinance was written to protect the views of adjacent properties and this proposal does that. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Kelley, to adopt Resolution #3268 for Application #1804 Michael Revler, 2691 Ethel Avenue, approving an average lakeshore setback variance for a new res Idence. Hurr requested the fesolutlon address the plantings along the lot line screening the drive. Mabusth stated on what grounds would we require this condition as the variance has no Impact on the Kauffman view windows. 4 r MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 12, 1993 ZONING FILE #1804 - CONT. Mayor Callahan clarified that the appileant has agreed to plant the shrubs or trees along the east side lot line. Revier stated he agrees to the plantings and does not object to inclusion of such in the resolution. Goetten amended her motion to include a statement In the resolution regarding the Installation of trees along the lot line screening the drive. Kelley seconded. Ayes 4, nays 1. Hurr voted nay. (#11) FOREST ARMS ASSOCIATION - SILTATION PROBLEM Mr. Norman and Mr. Lange were present. Gaffron explained the Homeowners Association Is currently working with the LMCD trying to adjust two slips of their joint use dock In order to use them. These slips have been rendered unusable due to sediment washed down from the storm sewer. The Association has requested the City clean out this area, and it has been determined that may cost $10,000 to $30,000. It is also felt thtt there is a substantial area of the neighborhood contributing to this sediment accumuI at I on. Jim Lange, 970 Forest Arms Lane, explained they have applied to the LMCD to reconfigure the joint dock to allow alI docks to face out thus eliminating the need to remove the sediment. That request has been denied. The Association feels the problem has occurred In part due to the structural design of the storm sewer. Hurr understood that the Association was requesting from the LMCD approval for enlarging the slips, which cannot be granted as the joint use Is a non-conforming dock. Lange said that was in Incorrect Interpretation. Mayor Callahan clarified that they need only decide if and who should make application to the DNR to remove the si I tat ion. Goetten said she could not authorize a City expenditure maintaining two private slips. She said she would like to additional information on the history of this situation and minutes from the LMCD meetlrgs. for see the Kelley noted homeowners associations are created to accept responsibility of maintenance. He felt the Association should make the application to the DNR. 6 t MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 12, 1993 FOREST ARMS ASSOCIATION - CONT. Jabbour felt the Association should continue to work with the LMCD to reconfigure the dock. Lange said they were exploring all their options prior to commencing legal action. He explained this property was acquired from the City for a fee, and the agreement stated they would recei/e 14 slips for their money. He suggested the City has rendered their portion of the bargain inoperable, and felt the substantial responsibility is the City’s. Jabbour suggested they try to find a resolution, which may include the reconfiguration of the dock. Hurr asked that the original agreement and conditions of sale be supplied to the Council. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Goetten to table action on this item until additional information is provided. Kelley asked if the homeowners assoc I at I on was created for the sole purpose to maintain the docks, and asked the status of the street. Lange said the street is public, but the association was created mainly to control the two lots jointly used by the neighborhood. Vote: Ayes 5, nays 0. (#12) HENNEPIN COUNTY - NORTH ARM ACCESS - REPAIR OF SEAWALL Mabusth explained the County has deemed the wooden timber walls adjacent to the ramp in a hazardous condition and requests permission to replace with steel. Th‘jy have hired a contractor to commence work the week of April 19th. Hurr requested verification that they would need to obtain a new conditional use permit for the repair of the seawall. Mabusth agreed that per the code, a new conditional use permit is required. Hurr suggested they interpret the code to mean if an existing conditional use permit was not In effect, any repair wouia require application for such a permit. Goetten agreed. -i MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 12, 1993 HENNEPIN COUNTY - NORTH ARM ACCESS - CONT. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Goetten, to authorize Hennepin County to repair of the seawall in the existing footprint at North Arm Access under the conditions of the original conditional use permit as previously approved. Mayor Callahan questioned her Interpretation to mean that, If destroyed, any building could be reconstructed under an existing conditional use permit. Hurr felt if built In the same footprint that would be allowed. Kelley disagreed and felt a new conditional use permit was needed. Jabbour suggested they short-circuit the process due to the public health, safety and welfare concerns. Mayor Callahan stated it seems that the County engineer was aware of the necessary repair, and that they did not feel it necessary to obtain the City’s permission. Mabusth noted the County has already filed for a conditional use perm!t. Vote: Ayes 2, nays 3. Mayor Callahan, Jabbour and Kelley voted nay. Mot Ion falled. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Kelley, to allow applicant to proceed with necessary repairs but require the filing of the required conditional use permit before repairs begin. Application would be reviewed at the May Planning Commission meeting as an after-the-fact application. The County must submit plans for Building staff and Engineer’s review prior to Installation. A building permit will be required for the repair work. Ayes 4, nays 1. Hurr voted nay. Mayor Callahan recessed from 8:47 to 8:55 p.m. (i13) INTERVIEW PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS Dale Lindquist. 780 North Brown Road, explained he has lived In Orono 17 years and previously has not had the time to be active In government and has recently sold his business Interests and now has the time. He felt his past experience In the construction business would be an asset. He noted he I s no longer on the Downtown CouncII. I a MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 12, 1993 INTERVIEWS - CONT. Kelley asked Lindquist what he felt is the one most important issue facing Orono. Lindquist felt that would be maintaining Orono as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Goetten asked his feelings on the Highway 12 issue. Lindquist felt it should remain in the existing corridor and felt either of the other two corridors woul detrimental to Orono. Mayor Callahan asked If he had read the comprehensive Plan. Lindquist said he had, twice. Mayor Callahan asked if he was aware that the Planning Commission is Just an advisory board to the Council, and asked If this would disturb him. Lindquist said he was aware of its status and It did not bother him. Jabbour stated he was impressed that he had read the Comprehensive Plan. James Lorence. 4460 North Shore Drive, stated he would like to help his Community. He added he has read the Comprehensive Plan and agrees with the philosophy and noted it will take strong people to adhere to it. He said prior to moving to Orono he lived in Eden Prairie, which is quite different. Kelley asked his thoughts on the largest single issue. Lorence felt that would be the location of Highway 12. Goetten asked since he Is the president of a company If he would have time to dedicate to the position. Lorence saK* he would make the time. Mayor Callahan Inquired about the building boom referred to In his appI I cat I on. Lorence stated Highway 12 will make the area more accessible and there will be pressures from developers, but felt the City should adhere to their Comprehensive Plan. MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 12, 1993 INTERVIEWS - CONT. Hurr asked if he has ever attended a Planning Commission meeting. Lorence stated no. Mayor Callahan asked if he was aware that the Planning Commission is an advisory body. Lorence stated he was aware of that fact. Kelley asked whether there Is any one element of the City’s plan he would change. Lorence Indicated he initially felt the Industrial portion of the City should be enlarged, but after review of the Plan felt it may be adequate, and felt their taxes should not Increase too much If density rema is constant. Charles Nolan. Jr.. 435 Old Crystal Bay Road, said he is involved In a family owned construction business, which has allowed him to watch changes in development and Its affect on cities. He stated he grew up In this area. He felt his past experience would be an asset as he is capable of reading plans and Interpreting development, able to negotia*a better solutions, and has some education in real estate development. Kelley asked if he would consider the financial aspects of development first. Nolan said ne would first consider the quality and environment with respect to new development. Goetten asked if he could divorce himself from his livelihood and make decisions based on the Comprehensive Plan. Nolan noted he loves this area and does not want to see change. He added he has read the Plan. Jabbour noted it is Important to make a distinction between development types, and asked his vision for the next five years. Nolan indicated he sees the character of Orono remaining the same, and hopes they can persevere from the development pressures to come. He said he does not mean he would take the side of the developer, but rather try to understand their position and try to resolve any issues. MINUTES OF A REGULAR CRCNO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 12, 1993 ■P!, INTERVIEWS - CONT. Jabbour asked If there was anything he would change with the Comprehensive Plan. Nolan said there was nothing. Hurr asked if he has attended any Planning Commission meetings. Nolan noted he has not in Orono, but has for other communities. Hurr Inquired about availability with respect to travel. Nolan stated he delegates most travel responsibilities to others. Kelley questioned his feelings on the Interaction of Lake Minnetonka and the City. Nolan stated the City has a large responsibiMty to manage the Lake with regard to long term life as it is a viable recrsational facility, and many homeowners have a vested interest. He su. gested his development background may unnerve members, but assured them his allegiance Is to this area and noted he has never developed here. Jim O’Neill. 4680 Creekwood Trail, stated he grew up In the area and hopes to raise his family here. He stated he hopes the principles in the Comprehensive Plan are adhered to. Jabbour questioned whether he read the Plan. O'M.slll said he has reviewed it briefly. He noted this area appeals to him as It Is not pro-development. Goatten questioned his views on Highway 12. O'Neill felt It should rema In the existing corridor. He added his background on the traffic and transportation committee at Bloomington may be of some help with this respect to this issue. Goetten asked how he views the changes If the highway Is moved. O'Neill feared there would be tremendous pressure from developers. Kelley questioned his views on the relationship of Lake Minnetonka wi th the City. MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 12, 1993 INTERVIEWS - CONT O’Neill felt Orono’s primary concern should be land Issues, and the lake should be secondary. He said he was surprised to see how much shoreline is controlled by the City. He felt they would realize adverse effects with regard to the lake if allowed to stray from the Comprehensive Plan. Sandra Smith. 30 Orono Orchard Road, stated she has lived In the area for 5 years and has read the Comprehensive Plan. She expressed surprise at the depth of the values expressed in the Plan. She noted she first became interested in local government because of the Highway 12 issue. She noted she has spent 20 years on the corporate side trying to strike a balance. Hurr asked If she has attended any meetings of the Planning CommIssI on. Smith said she had. Jabbour asked her position on Highway 12. Smith state she felt there should be no new roads and noted shn is Involved with the “Save the Luce Line" committee. Goetten questioned her views If the road is changed. Smith felt the Plan clearly defines areas to be developed and those to remain rural, and felt If the road were relocated that would adversely affect the philosophy of Orono. Kelley asked if she believes Orono Is a “bedroom community’, if planning should be viewed from the revenue or planning aspect, and If they should approve development to Improve the tax base. Smith felt the City has two different types of development, and felt the commercial areas should not be expanded. WlI I lam WroblewskI. 630 Park Lane, said he first became Interested when 2 1/2 years ago he needed to apply for a variance and discovered Orono’s concern and reason for limiting hardcover. Hurr asked If he has attended other Planning Commission meetings. WroblewskI said he has not. Hurr questioned his current occupation. MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 12, 1993 INTERVIEWS - CONT. WroblewskI said he is an insurance broker. Jabbour asked if he read the Comprehensive Plan. WroblewskI said he had and found It incredible with respect to development as it indicates an incredible amount of vision and foresiqht. He felt it was excellent. Mayor Callahan questioned where he formerly lived. WroblewskI said he moved from Naperville, Illinois, and prior to that Loretto and Minnetonka. Goetten asked what prompted his choice to settle here. WroblewskI stated they wished to live on the lake and send their child to Holy Name School. Kelley asked him to compare Orono to other communities. WroblewskI felt White Bear Lake was close but with more urban development. He said Orono is very unique. Goetten questioned his views on Highway 12. WroblewskI felt the City would experience a heavy impact on any of the three corridors, and felt once the City were more accessible, they would be under a lot of pressure from developers. Mayor Callahan informed each candidate that they would be notified of the Council’s decision. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT A) Hurr asked that the Information on the current Planning Commission members be submitted to the Council by the end of the week. B) Jabbour thanked Gaffron for the technical background supplied In composing the letter sent to the LMCD, DNR and the Watershed District. C) Kelley Informed them he has received Information from the Long Lake Fire Department, which he will review and report back on. D) Goetten asked that all members consider attending the League of Minnesota Cities' conference to be held in St. Cloud on June 8 through 11. MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 12, 1993 ENGINEER’S REPORT (»#14) PAY REQUEST #2/FINAL - 1992 SEAL COAT PROJECT It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to authorize Pay Request #2/Final to Omann Brothers, Inc., for the 1992 Seal Coat Project In an amount of $458.72. Ayes 4, nays 0. (»#15) PAY REQUEST #7/FINAL SEWER/WATER/STREET IMPROVEMENTS - HIGHWAY FRONTAGE ROAD It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to authorize Pay Request #7/Final to B & D Underground, Inc., for the Highway 12 sewer/water/street improvements for an amount of $10,597.82. Ayes 4, nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (i16) CRYSTAL BAY POST OFFICE LEASE Moorse reported the Postal Service has agreed to extension of the existing contract for five years, with the same rental rate, subject to maintenance of the building. Hurr questioned the lack of an increase in rental rates and the need for the City to maintain and repair the building. Jabbour noted the Postal Service is leaving the office in Crystal Bay as a service to the community. Goetten agreed with Hurr and noted costs go up on all other rental units and felt they should look into an increase. Kelley suggested selling the building to them for $50,000. Hurr asked the rates for the Minnetonka Beach office. Gerhardson said they rent that space for $4l6/month. Hurr noted that office has 1/8 the room that the Crystal Bay site does. Gerhardson noted the Postal Service has indicated they find It hard to justify the amount currently being charged, and added they base their amounts on valuation of property. Mayor Callahan reiterated that It was the City’s position that the office would remain as a courtesy to the area residents. He questioned the background negotiations. MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 12, 1993 CRYSTAL BAY POST OFFICE - CONT. Moorse said they had not bargained heavily and could question the basis for paying Minnetonka Beach that amount. Mayor Callahan directed staff to enter Into further discussion with the Postal Service regarding a possible rate Increase. Kelley asked the number of homes the office serves. Mayor Callahan said that would be approximately 90, and noted the office has proved profitable. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Goetten, to table action on th.s I tern allowing staff time to renegotiate the terms of the contract and to provide Council with further Information, such as a comparison of square footage and rates paid. Jabbour questioned the feelings of the Postal Service with regard to the future. Kelley felt they should keep the office no matter what. Vote: Ayes 5, nays 0. (*t17) WEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES PLANNING BOARD FUNDING REQUEST It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to authorize funding of $117.59 to the West Hennepin Human Services Plr^nning Board for a directory of human services. Ayes 4, nays 0. (•18) REVIEW OF CIGARETiE VENDING MACHINE ORDINANCE Moorse explained after adoption, but prior to publication, the owner of Jimmies’ Lounge requested special consideration to the location of his cigarette machine as he cannot meet the required 20’ setback from the entry. Jabbour felt they should change the ordinance to require a 13’ setback from the entry. Goetten felt that It would be unreasonable to change the orolnance. Jabbour reminded them It Is the only bar In Orono. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Jabbour, to amend Ordinance #114, Second Series, changing the required setback from an entry from 20 to 12’ and/or visible from an employee station. Ayes 3, nays 2. Goetten and Mayor Callahan voted nay. i MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 12, 1993 CIGARETTE VENDING MACHINE ORDINANCE - CONT. Goetten said she was appalled that they would amend the ordinance when only two meetings ago all agreed to this setback requirement. She felt that a request by one bar owner should not make the Council Just change the requirement so as to make It easier to purchase cigarettes. Hurr reminded her that up until a year ago, the City Itself was selIIng cigarettes. (*#19) CHANGE OF LOCATION FOR PRECINCT #1 POLLING LOCATION - RESOLUTION #3269 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3269 designating a new Precinct #1 polling location. Ayes A, nays 0. (*#20) EXEMPTING UTILITY COMPANIES FROM POSTED ROAD WEIGHT RESTRICTIONS - RESOLUTION #3270 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3270 allowing exemption of public service vehicles on posted City streets. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*#21) POLICE LIEUTENANT CONTRACT It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve the police lieutenant union contract settlement for the year 1993 as proposed. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*#22) JOINT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT CDBG PROGRAM - RESOLUTION #3271 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3271 authorizing Mayor and City Administrator to sign Joint Cooperation Agreement. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*#23) ORONO SPRING CLEAN UP It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve authorize the Spring Clean up Days as May 1 and May 8, 1993, the conditions set forth. Ayes 4, nays 0. and per (*#24) YARD WASTE DROP OFF SCHEDULE OF DATES It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to authorize the yard waste program as establlsh« .. Ayes 4, nays 0. MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 12, 1993 (*#25) SALARY ADJUSTMENT - OFFICER DAVID MCNICHOLS It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to Increase Officer David McNIchols’ salary from $14,657 per hour to $16,490 per hour as of March 16, 1993, as per the 1993 LES contract currently In effect. Ayes 4, nays 0. (♦#26) SALARY ADJUSTMENT - OFFICER JAY DEMBOUSKI It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to Increase Officer Jay Dembouskl’s salary from $16,490 per hour to $18,322 per hour as of April 6, 1993, as per the 1993 LES contract currently In effect. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*#27) LICENSES It was moved by Jabbour, following licenses: seconded by Goetten, to approve the Site Evaluator/Designer: Septic System Installer: Set-Up: S-P TestIng, Inc. David Perkins Contracting Inc. Navarre Lanes, Inc. Ayes 4, nays 0. (»#28) BILLS It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Ayes 4, nay 0. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Cal Iahan adjourned tfe regular Orono City Council meeting to Executive Session at 10:15 p.m. Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hal I In, City Clerk TO:Mayor Callahan and Orono Council Members Ron Moorse, Citv Administrator COUNOLMEETING1^1 FROM: Stephen Weekman, On-Site Systems Manager APR 2 6 1993 OIYOFORONO DATE:April 21. 1993 SUBJECT: #1808 James Abrahamson, 4630 Tonkaview Lane - Variance Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.24, Subd. - Lot minimum requirements. Required lot area = 1 acre Existing area = .74 acres Variance = .26 acres or 26% Additional Exhibits I - Resolution J - Notice of Planning Commission Action K - Planning Commission Memo and E.xhibits Description of Request The applicant requests a lot area variance to construct a new residence on an undeveloped property. This property is one of several lots which were created in 1961 that do not meet the 1 acre lot area requirement. As all of the lots within this subdivision are less than 1 acre, no additional acreage is available from the adjacent lots. No additional variances are required with this application. The applicant’s house plan and survey can be reviewed, refer to Exhibits D, F and G. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission unanimously approved the lot area variance based on the following findings: 1. No other land is available for purchase as the property surrounding this parcel arc nearly all developed and do not meet the 1 acre requirement either. 2. The lot size is consistent with the developed lots in the neighborhood. 3. Municipal sewer is available and the property has been assessed for sewer. fhe enclosed resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation. . nw jQv’uoaCITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 ZONING FILE #1808 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: 4/21/93 TO: James Abrahamson 14475 40ih Place North Plymouth, MN 55446 COPIES TO:Richard Laughlin 22025 SW 87ih Ave. Samaritan Village Camp iVliami, Florida 33190 TYPE OF APPLICATION:Variance DATE OF MEETLNG: 4/19/93 VOTE:5 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval as submitted. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Applicant ’s next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council April 26, 1993; meeting starts at 7:30 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Conunission. K A RESOlUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) FILE ^1808 WHEREAS, James Abrahamson (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in the property located at 4629 Tonkaview Lane within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Tract C, Registereu Land Survey No. 1036, Liles of Registrar of Titles, Heimepin County, Miimesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the construction of the residence on a .74 acre lot where 1 acre is required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVTID by the O^y Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. Tliis application was reviewed as Zoning File #1808. The property is located in tlie LR-IB, Zv<n:ng n««frict 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on April 19, 1993, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based on the following findings: A. Additional land is available as the adjacent lots do not meet the area requirements of the zoning district. B. The lot size is consistent with those within the neighborhtxxi. Page 1 of 4 iiM* 4. 5. C.An casement across Tract D providing access to Tonkaview Lane has been granted in favor of the subject property (Tract C). D. No additional variances arc required E. Municipal sewer is available and the property has been assessed for sewer. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessaiy to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the construction of a residence on a 74 acre lot where 1 acre is required subject to the following conditions: 1.Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit v^ithin one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (April 26, 1994). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Pace 2 of 4 3.The undersigned applicant lias read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to tlie recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 26th day of April, 1993. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Ila'.lin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on thi.s 26th day of April, 1993, by Edward J Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & Cit> Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was e.\ecuted on behalf of the City. Notary Public Mv Commission Expires Page 3 of 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged tliat he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC n STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On iliis day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared ___________________ know n to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) e.xecuted the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Paee 4 of 4 I. TO:Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM; Stephen Weekman. On-Site Systems Manager DATE:April 5. 1993 SUBJECT; /^1808 James Abrahamson. 4630 Tonkaview Lane - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District LR-IB, Lakeshore Residentiai, 1 acre minimum Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.24, Subd. 5(B) - Lot minimum requirements. Required lot area = 1 acre Existing area = .74 acres Variance = .26 acres or 26% List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D Survey n - 1961 Survey I- - Main Floor Plan Cl - Front Elevation 11 - E.xample Variance Resolution Description of Request The applicant requests a lot area variance to construct a home on his property. This property is one of several lots which were created in 1961 that do not meet the one acre lot area requirement. Thetefore, no additional acreage is available from these lots. In 1987 a lot area variance was granted for one ot the lots, 4625 Tonkaview Road, which provided an easement across 4635 Tonkaview Road for access to his property and Mr. Abrahamson ’s property. •nilThe applicant requires no additional variances. Thi” property lies between 500-1,' from the ordinary high water level of Lake Minnetonka, thus the applicant has supplied a hardcover calculation worksheet. The hardcover for the proposed residence and driveway totals 11.2%, considerably below the allowed 35% required in this zone. No additional variances are required. Municipal sewer is available and the property has been assessed for sewer. As access to this property will be via an easement through Lot 1) of Registered Land Survey No. 1036, the address of this property must be changed to 4655 Tonkaview Lane. Zoning Pile #1808 April 5, 1993 Page 2 Hardship Statement No other land is available for purchase as the properties surrounding this parcel are nearly all developed and do not meet the 1 acre requirement either. The lot size is consistent with those developed lots in the neighborhood. Municipal sewer is available and tlie property has been assessed for the sewer. CITY OF ORONO — VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee ($17^0,0- •* «L:r» ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 ^ (no change frcni original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fav. Fees (Double application fee) nv ‘ A jm mm m mmm m 0 tm • • ••r* f < V ! 'L f y# f Cri I I u*l L I p. * I < u f ' i. i- : ! >I jLnnifu.u VI t 11-1- PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address J. VWC. W VV'V mV rry ^VI 4 # w» • V l.h'iLA R 175.C l<ECEIPT-lH/iHK YOU ^E6S24V cool f<01 709 r/T**.Vw'/ \ Property Identif. Nurober (P.I.D.) 7 Attach legal description to application if not Zoning ni strict; I^R - I 3 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (home)applicant E Phone (woric), y iHOl‘4' Vfi-tL ffac<i /J city.flurn^rrfyL __ Name Address owner (if different than applicant) Name __ Address Phone (worlc)/vtT- Lt u4 ^ l^r( ix^ (i / ^------- ------- - - -----------------------------------------~72-^ Estimated Construction Cost $_/z> CJjC^K.y .wfctki-h DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe reguest in de hy> ■•'6; «7,vf -L- wail; UAaL-)U LlCtlJ Ch) K^. Vv^Ka —-- - - - - - VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setbac)c: Lot Width Lot Coverage Front Side Hardcover __ Rear ___ Average Lalceshore Other (specify) HiroSHIP^ESOTlPTION OP DITOSDAI. PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual proper conditions preventing compliance wit^ Zgning Cyde requirements:, r ff f : } ' ' '(attach additional sheets.if ncceaaary}.-^'' ' \ RSQOIRED SUBMITTALS All of the follovincr information must bo auhmlttcd by tha ■pplicatioc deadline date in order for voiir agplication to be conaiderad copplatg? 1. 2. 3., 4.‘ 5. 6. 7. Conplated Application Form Carcified Property Owners List o£ owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 fiovt Center 348-3271). _Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). _^Certifieate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy Bh^xll” for reproduction) . Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) If any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8%"xll"). Sketches or plans of floor • elevation viewe (provide 1 copy 8*f”xll”). As an addendum to this application* please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Froperty Owner must sign this application. Please remember that voor varlanCT application is not ccBPlete if the above Infoi—tloo hjie not been incloded. APPL2CAIT*8 SIOIATOSB The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requeated by the Zoning Administrator* wvgrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered )y original fee payrient) and/or consultant expenses Incurred in review of this application* and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the J^ast pt hia/her )cnowledga. Applicant's Signature «ate ommif sxoiiATtnui The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorises reaaonable entry onto the property by city staff* coasultanta# agents* Cammiseion members* and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and *^erlfica Owner's Signature f thiffv request. Date AppllcAnti nus^ hjiv# «11 subinittAl^ Into feh# City offlcsi 2S dAyi b#£ortt t^d flanaiag Coomisaion Meeting. Planning Commieelon Meetings are held on. the third Monday of each month. Applicants muat be present at all eohedmled review meetings of the Plaaaing CoBmlssion and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting* please make arrangementi to have an authorised agent attend In your place and to advise the Building s Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 7 ff (rr>.mrrJ J y .*-1- ■ V-x,^ // . * ! 1 /4^,: DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with M.S. 13.04, Subd. 2, "Rights of subjects of data"^ we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may requi you to furnish certain private or confidential information. -You are notified that: 1. ■ The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification ^^r the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license 3 The information may be shared with other local, state or f;deLl agencies to the extent necessary to process the pern.it or license. 4. If your requested permit or license inquires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. you have certain rights under M.S. 13.04 to review private data on yourself. 6. your full name is required to process this application or permit. ll /-Lvrti iumi LastFirst Middle ^ I V. Address -PI \jclt)l state Zip Phone I understand my rights as stated above. \ f ly .'I gnature HARDCOVER CALOJLATIOfl WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE one) 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' f500-1GC0 Existing Hardcover in Zone • • iA. ■ H ouse 2'X - !9n ... LENGTH• • m WIDTH • X • m X • • = S.P. m • X • = _ S.F. • X ^ =• S.F. B.Garage _.X 3?'__ C.Driveway .. *7 ^X 30 = s... X • • » S.F. 0.. • • Sidewalk 'X _ = ■ S.F. X ® S.F. X . * S.F. E.’at 10/ D eck X S.F. F.Landscape X - * S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN BY X - ■ - S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING • X • - S.F. • X • • - S.F.• 6. Other X - _ S.F. Total H ardcover IN Zone ,.p. (T •» • Total Property A rea IN Zone 3>^3l 0 S.F, 1 b ] 1 A 4 R ZH.5IC X inn - / / .> 3. % jr-r-E'. t • A ' • \^ ■: (• & ip) *^in/iy^/A x^ '/> %r 3A x£*/ v4^''^3 •• ^ y y '’«5s^'’-»'x' /r' '5 5 (45)’CO • _ «1 S PT CPT@8!lAVI ECSJ ; ‘ ^/ •*•(37)f(03 ( •* 4 f ‘J»'~ « X, (J9)> <«> .-. J :•••. •• 45r. I ©AI^IDEUSS <o* _!?^S (2r) **«3*36 » I® -''* '< I.A-oXl jA f<‘ 53 ^'•« .(33),. PT Of 6 PI Of lOt (30 yi N^Xi > S)V ^/( (58) ^ ^/o/tSI5TAHA6'»‘^ C0^£?5/^ _> 4'Jft(5«)Z * (2«i efe k 63 f'-. ^ • ‘5f. (i I f > ' '^3. 54 ' i/W‘’‘’*26) i .4P I £ASt USE Of R I S it3^(r (26) .^’.4? ?)'/ .........................., T-TTTIuo.os ,y^^> v<.? V-- /' 7 / f, i\ „ AX3I) ' r#> K V. iU' ^ (29) ’txV^ V ’ rV .. W a/ (30) A«-X ' y^A ^^4 45 w SiVWx ■'. ..'X ('(a) ' «(16) * (17),>s '4»0W h4S: R»459 9Z 4 15 /?0> not -J Talent 1 \ ^ \rv 1473 (V 10 % ^ '■;® <Ci (23/\ I-\ * t 4 • 4 I ‘i * 1 •<.RUN OATf Oi/ii/n BATCH 002 HENI«PIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 0»WERS LIST r r r 38 D7-117-23 32 0003 38 07-117-25 3? 0024PROP ADDR 0A725 TONKAVIEN LA 00038 ADDRESS UNASSTGNEDONNER NAME EAT CHRISTIANSON RICHARD A LAUGHLINTAXPAYEREARL 1 TERRY CHRISTIAT^RICHARD LAUGHLINNAHE/AODR 4641 TONKA VIEN LANE 4635 TC*A(AVIEH ROc• HOUND MN 5536<V ORONO m 55364 • 58 07-117-23 32 0026 38 07-117-23 32 0027 PROP ADDR 0005B ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 04635 TtRACAVlEH LA ONNER NAME RICHARD A LAUGHLIN RICHARD A LAUGHLIN TAXPAYER RICHARD LAUGHLIN RICHARD LAUGHLIN r « NAHE/ADDR 4635 TtMCAVXEN RD 4635 TOrtCAVIEH RO ORONO MN 55364 ORONO m 55364 r •• 58 07-117-25 52 0029 38 07-117-23 32 0050 PROP ADDR D0036 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 046B0 NORTH SHORE DR C»t€R NAME KrniS A HEYER DENNIS A MEYER TAXPAYER DENNIS A HEYER DENNIS A MEYER (NAHE/ADDR 4680 NORTH SHORE DR 4680 NORTH SHORE DR HOr*D HN 55364 f • MOUND HN 55364 A 8 • 58 07-117-25 52 0055 SB C7-117-23 32 0056 PROP ADDR 04675 NORTH SHORE OR 04685 NORTH SHORE DR c ONNER NAME T C CORBIN A J L HISFELOT T C CO’?BIN A J L MISFELOT TAXPAYER TYLER C CORBIN T C COABIN A J L MISFELOT %NAHE/ADDR 4685 NO SHORE OR 4665 N3RTH SHORE OR V,HOUND m 55564 HOUND FM 55364 r 58 07-117-25 52 0059 • r PROP ADDR 04695 NORTH SHORE OR OltCR NAME STEPHEN C A JOAIME A HARD TAXPAYER STEPHEN C NARO TOTAL BATCH 002 00015 NAHE/ADDR 4695 NORTH SHORE DR c MOUND HN 55564 REPORT NO. PI<HW01 PAGE 2 s ]38 07-117-23 32 00250<#625 TONKAVIEN LA NAS NOLOHINTON D A SHERYL L HOLD ^625 TONKAVIEH LA HOUND MN 5536^ 38 07-117-23 32 002^ 04655 TONKAVIEH LA DENNIS A NEVER DEWIS A MEYER 4660 NORTH SHORE DR HOUND m 55364 SB 07-1I7-2S 32 0052 01515 REST POINT LA K J GROVER ASK GROVER KEVIN J GROVER ANO SUSAN K GROVER 1515 REST POINT LA MINNETRISTA TM 553AA ■1C 38 07-117-23 32 0058 04705 NORTH SHORE DR R A CRANFORD A A C CRANFORD RODNEY A A ANN C CRANFORD BOX 845 CAREFREE AZ 65377 f r' Ir- ( c (' r ( r HUN OATf QS/2S/9S BATCH 002 c r r 4^;rw <! i'’ AriV^ T =fe ■’'f • 'r# MENNEPIM COUKTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OILERS LIST REPORT NO. PI43S401 PAGE 3 X CERHFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPPESFNTATION OF If^FORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS OAT^ ON THE RECORDS OF THE HErt€PIN COliNTY DEPART^NT^OF PROP|J)P^TAXATIONb TQ,,^ BEST OF HY liCHLEDGE ANJ CELIEF. • ♦ •.i '• ,1*- » • #• • ' '4r " t LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES SURVEYED Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 1035, files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, it does not purport to show any other improvements or encroach­ ments. I£ 0 Iron marker found Iron marker set Spot elevatio'' mean sea level dati ii Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. ipssiilii and of rec^d In the office of the Reglatrar of Titles In and f said c(^tj. And that the surrey shovn herein is a correct de tlon of sal jurrey. to '~ 8. to. S, Kelley, XELtuCr Ic KELLE3, E^lnsirs & Sur* Long Lake, Minnesota IMs registered land surrey was approved aivi accepted by thi ;e Council of the^iy.age of Ckonq^^onej ota. at a recular t reof held this day of reg^ar ▼irUUJE C0D2JCIL CT CROHO Scalet Date t • I 1" • 100' Deceober 5, 1961 Iron Barker Bearings are aesuaed FILED Cl tiring RCOir.T r ) p'L‘:v;:.rj:iS.iVjd:tor CO.. / ' ' O ‘ 681J .'58 OFFICE CF RECISTPAR OF TITLES HENNEPiN COUinr MINNESOTA i Hertby Citti/y That the within Reg^t^UEd-land~S11r -ev No /(2J^ Flies of Registrar of Titles, wdrFn®<iNn this office ----day of, „2hf/^ ...A D. /Uz. eL£^'clock Pv DONALD C. BENriiY^QFF JR^gtstrSTcf I^eputy. GSil38 CFITCE OF RECIiTFiAa OF TITLES \ H£N;;LPIN COU.LY MIM 2 \01A I Htreby Carti/y That I have cai^ulty ccinpjred the wilhin copy of Registered Land Survey — Files cj Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin, with tha ofigmcl v.rn^i v.3j^ed in th;s office this JzdSa —day of_2z::av.. A. D. at 4T.;rJ o ’cloc k , end find tne same to fc; a irus and epM^t thrreef. DOf^LD C. BtNNYHOFF Registrar of Titles Q Deonty. t-O- ^ 'Tic.y f.Ttm c? "( • • ' ' y V 4i 4 . • t • • • ♦• • * * . t' •a«*o . * <« 4; • • ■• K .-v; . .. *f V • « - • n • *• I \ . i! '• • «•« •t ^ *^1 *1S^ V • , %» •. .t M it p-rp^. k-- r S' II u ' - fv: :^V> fi i*^y of ORONO >^l FESOLUTiON OF THH CtTV COUNCIL NO •m J » A UKSOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCB TO municipal zoning COOB SBCTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION S(II) PII.K fl22« WUBRRAS, Winton Weld (hereinafter "the applicant") h.ir. an i..terw^t in the property located at f.’crth Shore Drive within tlu- City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and loqally doscribid a= -~ ‘rvcy Ko. 1036, Henno|,in County, ••linnc'wOtLi (heroinatter the? property*'); and ^ *'“****^*®» ‘•Pplicant ha-. ..pnli,,d to the Citv for . ('inr.csota t not», TiiRKErone, DK it RKSOI.VEO by t. City Council of orono. PI'lOINGa 1. This applicaticn was; reviewed as Toning Fil« #1226. 2. The property is . Kcsidontsal 2onin»j DiJifrict.> Li'-.i, Ginvjl Par.iiy LaJces.'icr N-vorber 1? ^i ^ Ccitu.ission reviewed this app i ication oni..-ior.ter 16, 1987, and recornendod approval of tr.c oroDoiiec- variance based uron the foUowir.g fir.dinqst propo.ei. a) Ko otter land ir, availabJc fer purchase. r!!® KK ' t co.-.sistert with existing developed lofs in tnu .**.eighbornood. * i,..,. c;) \he lot sire Vuriunco is coniii *;tc*nt with lot ';i26. " -vuiUbl. ,„rt tho propurty h.. bo-n r- i- . .. I-'. ■>- b I ¥U: iV- / • .. : . ;-f'ry • •.. x,rj .'f fM ^ % .. . • •' - ^t * -I ... ^•%l . -»W • ■-,•. ^ '* City of ORO.NO resolution Of THfc Cl rv COUNCIL NO '-• • V mmw the finclinqs an"*^r«co2J5enj"Vions^^tf^Vhe*??^ incluriinq cor..i,unity. on the health. ».,frty and welfare of the r V • prof-erty ,.iro ^cuUor^to*and do'not"**^*!^*"* ®****1"4 ®" »hfs property in m= Uni'Voi.trir^ *® «'•>«» would not adversely affect traffi*-* #•!%•» »variance poue a fire hasard or other ro Ii9«t, air nor not merely serve as a <•«•»«««f^^i^hborinq property; would necestnry to , tljo appi tc.St, b; t ii n.ees».ry to prVs,r« . ."•’•“'•'‘P ®r dtfficujtyi i* applicent, ond tn keooIj;*«\Vh '‘’hP »* ‘h* the tonin, code end CoopreL^^^oof'tlT.Vy* ■“ C0HCUI810IIS0 OROKR AND CONDITJONS grant:, a ^vnianco VcT tho'^^iileVoa^' 7o* Council hereby Sufcdivir.ioh S(B) approvino th/ Section I0.-4. rosidor.ee on a lot o*i 0%?Vre wr4eMT."®'' ® required subject to the followinq conSftio.nsf ’ between Tract%^nd^TMcts T'an^ hVrebC property line bctw..„ ^rVet, V.nVo. * • “'““rod fro. tho -ctual iot linl prior to "on«ruct^„‘‘of *"<* approval Tho driveway /kali S«SL!J* '‘''-''f *5®'“* *" TonkaviJw Lanv. and oxtendil/.t l«^« 20" 1I..V V“" "®” *•••" »i«Pv purpoao. wn.ro th. driv«..y «„t«rs onto creatW. TractW»*c would*hS**^****1*^.^'"* **'•* «aaeo.nt is not to Coipty poad l» of 2 ioeJ/i//^!‘i'r' * •*"«»• *<*••» cen- y Ot tho tloo o Counlr.cVo?r 7/“"iff^ by^ H.nnvp.n pai!l*Wth*k‘“diSS ^JJl,rt. *”*■“'* achcdolo to bo PuifdinVporBlt.^^"** ***'®r unit trunk charoe to bo paid with rage 2 of 4 ;.; f. =i!l1 M: :Xi3 ¥ ;V, ..'r -i:? -■n . 'v.pv Cilyof ORO.NO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO 'i. 1 run with the, preporty -t.. the applicant# but are pcrmiii&ive onlv ami nu*r h«. *“ho*^dato'*oT'^Co^u^V^fbuilding ptrmit within one year of ;L\^'ra:c"(oocrber triVsti: - ho ^;n,u\‘c^'‘r^h^^3‘’;a^r„;r^ ?f'f>“‘^^nr,t l.„a road, u„,l.,ratc,od ..r„l hor.Ly ni’- M-- '■''=°l«!cr. and cn tohalf of himself, O ►'i- i^c-olur^«n ‘i-£>:^/na, rereoy agrees to the recording. ..i- resolution m the cnain ct title of tho property. ^ orU-r, 'm:'.*”''thin Uth day of ’• Cu^mX Jc*r I ... Cr-4, Mayer ' *s% "- Page i of 4 -*■ - A i i'*' City of ORO.no RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO i-'J <• NWJTiaiir I'TiVi'i: ci' M:»mi:r.oTA } > us. ^•ouiiTY OK HLr;:;i:KiN ) ;; JJ \ On ili:s d a y o f ^ Jnr '-’ 11V /y < ,19R / bclurc iT.c- u Notary I'uNixc witl.ln unti lur cald county, personally uf;pc*ur«,’d ft known tu ii'C to Lc trie f.«.*rsor. (' d<:scribcu i i. and wl... cxccut«.*d the foroqoino xrit;t ruHicnt. and acknowIcdqod That h«; (they) executed the i.ane u:> hiu (thexri tree act and deed. '7 / NOTARY IUIjLIC »■ '>• '' '/^ :r: rortvi scion rxf':r ’:s CTATL OF MINNCSOTA ) )SS. (O'JNTY 01 IICNWKHW ) c*W.On rhin ^ . .. . diy of ; 0^1 ‘.i . * before ir.j .1 t«w*iiry tijiilji wifliiit and fa'i •• ina i 1 y i«d . i 1 »-J.y <Kni.aii t.e «:.c Lu Lai the pe : u / .hcd a.'.d •..i.o t;;*.cutad the tort qoxno inctrur .-nt, «r.d acknow 1 edqod thar he (they) ».xe<"ut*.*d the L.amc as 1.1 s \th«.xr) f:ec art and deed. / / ; <y / NOTAi'Y 1 niji.r: r.• / Ir . j / . t >-4 MV C(-MKISniON RXPIR^ Knqe 4 of 4 • -’t .waM,..a. ................yjakJU •S To:Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse. City Administrator couNcamoni From:Stephen Weckinan. On-Site Systems Manager APR 2 6 1993 OTYOFOfKMO Date:April 22. 1993 Subject: #1809 Daniel and Barbara Hoffman, 1135 Heritage Lane - Variance Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.23, Subd. 6 (B) - Lot minimum requirements. Lot Area Requqired Existing = Variance = = 2 acres 1.1 acres : 0.9 acres or 45% Front Setback Required Existing Variance = 50’ = 35’ = 15’ or 30% Side Setbac< Required Existing = 30’ = 25’ Variance = 5 ’ or 17% Additional Exhibits J - Resolution K - Notice of Planning Commission Action L - Plarming Commission Memo and Exhibits Description of Request The applicants request variances for lot area, front setback, and side setback in order to reconstruct their home which was severly damaged by fire early this year. The applicants propose to totally replace the residence in nearly the same location, maintaining existing front and side yard setbacks, while saving the mature maple tree west of the residence. The entire Fox Hill Subdivision was developed prior to the incorporation of the current LR'IA Zoning District standards. The majority of lots within the subdivision arc approximately I acre in area and many of the homes in this subdivision do not meet the currem setback requirements. The applicants propose a new residence which is slightly larger than the cxistuj structure, however, the existing front and side yard setbacks would be maintained and the 1<^ 4% '' M. IT Zoning File #1809 April 22. 1993 Page 2 V : j hardcover is well below the 35% allowable in this zone. The applicants ask for this variance in order to save a mature tree west of the proposed residence as well as limit considerable site alterations which would be necessary in order to meet the required setbacks. Soil testing ar.d system design have been approved by the City for a new on-site system which is required of the home reconstruction, however, no alternate site is available for this property. Drainfield siting will be difficult on many lots in this development due to small lot sizes and steeply sloping topography. Please refer to the Planning Commission and exhibits for further information. planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommended approval of this application provided that no additional variances will be required for the construction of the residence. The motion passed with the vote 5-For, 0-Against. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation. CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357TO: Daniel and Barbara Hoffman231 Harrington Drive Long Lake, MN 55356 ZONING FILE: #1809NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: April 22. 1993 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance DATE OF MEETING: 4/19/93 VOTE:5 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval, subject to the conditions noted below. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: The applicants must construct a residence requiring no additional variances. Applicams- next scheduled meeting is coirfimed as City Council. April 26. 1993: meeting starts at 7:30 p.i . If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes they are available from the City Clerk after review and -.pproval by the Planning Commission. > A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) FILE NO. 1809 WHEREAS, Daniel and Barbara Hoffman (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 1135 Heritage Lane within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows; Lot 1. Block 1, Fox Hill and that part of Lot 2, Block 3. Fox Hill beginning at a point on the east line of said Lot 2, distant 50 feet southerly at the northeast corner of said Lot 2, as measured along said east line; thence northwesterly to a point on the north line of said Lot 2, distant 107 feet westerly of the northeast comer of said Lot 2. according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City foi variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of a residence on a 1.1 acre lot where 2 acres is required; and to allow the construction of the residence 35’ from the front lot line where 50’ is required and 25 ’ from the side lot line to the south where 30’ is required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota; RNDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1809. ■y The property is located in the LR-IA Ijikeshore Residential Zoning District The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on April 19. 1993 and recommended approval of the propt^sed variances based upon the following findincs Page 1 of 4 A.The existing residence was severely damaged by fire, requiring nearly total replacement of the structure. B. C. The lot size is consistent with those in the neighborhood. A conforming on-si:? system can be installed to support the 3-bedroom residence. D. The lot is severely limited by topography and mature vegetation The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and uo not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not imrely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to presence a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS. ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) »o permit the construction of a residence on a 1 .1 acre lot where 2 acres is required; and to allow the construction of the residence 35 ’ from the front lot line where 50’ is required and 25’ from the side lot line to the south where 30’ is required, subject to the following conditions: A'- no alternate drainfield site is available for this property, the applicant will be required to fence off the proposed drainfield site prior to the issuance of a building permit. Page 2 of 4 Ik Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the will expire on that date (April 26. 1994). 3 Violation of or non^tompliance with any of the terms and conditions of tWs resolution shall constimte a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4 The undersigned applicants have re-d. understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Cham of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 26th day of April. 1993. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin. City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner (s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledge'! tzcfore me 1993 by Edward J Callahan, Jr and o^the Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrume City. I Notar\ Public Page ^ ot 4 - ■ ■■. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county. personally appeared----------^^ known to me to be the person(s) descnbed m and who executed ihe foregoing instnimenl. a'ndlcknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county. personally appeared----------^-----.. . . known to me to be the person(s) descnbed in and who execut^ the foregoing instniment. aiidicknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 4 of 4 TO:DATE:Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse. City AdministratorFROM* Stephen Weekman. On-Site Systems ManagerApril 13, 1993SUBJECT: ff\S09 Daniel and Baibara Hoffman. 1135 Heritage Lane - VariancePublic Hearing Zoning District LR-IA, Lakeshore Residential, 2 acre minimum. Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.23, Subd. 6(B) - * ot minimum requirements lx)t Area Required = Existing = Variance = 2 acres l.l acres 0.9 acres or 45% Front Setback Required Existing Variance = 50* = 35* = 15’ or 30% Side Setback Required Existing Variance = 30’ = 25’ = 5’ or 17% List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Survey E - Existing Site Plan F - Proposed Site Plan G - Front Elevation H - Aerial photo \h . Zoning File /^1809 April 13, 1993 Page 2 Description of Request The applicants request variances for lot area, front setback, and side setback in order to reconstruct their home, which was severely damaged by a fire early ihij year. The applicants propose to totally replace the resident near its previous location in order to limit the loss of mature trees. Review of this variance request reveals that the entire Fox Hill Subdivision was developed in 1965 prior to the incorporation of the current LR-IA zoning district standards. This subdivision consists of lots approximately 1 acre in area many of which have existing homes that do not meet the current setback requirements. None of these lots can be developed or rebuilt on without a lot area variance. The applicants have supplied preliminary plans of a new residence for your review. The proposed residence maintains the existing substandard front yard and side yard setbacks, 35’ and 25’ respectively, while increasing the floor plan by 460 s.f. plus a 170 s.f. gazebo. The totol hardcover for the proposed reconstruction is 7,860 s.f. or 16.4%. Although there is an increase in hardcover of 2,200 s.f., the 16.4% hardcover is well below the 35% limit in this zone. The proposed floor plan will resu't in the loss of an Ohio Buckeye tree north of the proposed residence, but the Silver Maple will be saved. It should also be noted that the gazebo iS proposed 5’ ^rom the residence, while a 10’ setback is required. As this parcel lies within 1,000’ of the ordinary high water level of Lake Minnetonka, the newly adopted Shoreland Regulations require that the existing septic system be confinncd as conforming. A site inspection performed by S-P Testing revealed that the existing system lies in mottled fill soil and is not a conforming system. Therefore, soil testing and septic system design has been completed and approved by the City for a 3-bcdroom home. The proposed drainfield site is within 50’ of existing well, which must therefore be relocated in order to maintain the required setback. Also, no suitable site is available for a: alternate drainfield site. The new septic system will be oversized as much as the site will allow to increase the longevity of the system Hardship Statement The applicants are limited by an undersized lot and mature vegetation. The lot is 1.1 acres in a 2-acre minimum zone with no additional property available. The unusual shape of the parcel and the mature maple tree adjacent to the residence restricts its relocation further to the west. %t V•/ • ' CITY OP ORONO ARIANCE APPLICATION ^ j^C J Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) LIT: CF CUC^O Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 _ i‘F.-Jit (no cnange from original application) ^ _ Variance for non conforming use $200.00 i'i l-t-v clD.t After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) 'u £15,C PROPERTY INFORMATION /.r rrr.T_r.u v ynu // ?r ■ K ) -Ti'iTO > sjiTz^o icoi m uSite Ac:ress , T ck Lc\\^< ^ -----h.?.^ Property .dentif. Number (P. I.D. )—LJi OO^j Attach legal des '»-iptlon to application if not included on required survey. Date PrppertiV Acquired // / (month/year) I (do)(do no^ also own th4 ad^cent parcels of land. Present ust of property* ^/^^residential other (specify)___ ■ Zoning District: ! A_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ APPLICANT Pc{h>e Phone (home) ^ V ? ?£. __ Name rt, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (work) g7(f-7g^..i- ^ddr^ss^^^/ Citv:Z-^»^ La^l^Q.— Zip:_£3I=LA^— OHNBR (if different than applicant) Phone (home)- --- - - - - --- Name /?/< A > ____________________ Phone (work)---------------------------- Address:____________________________ Cityi--------------------------_____________-II- DBSCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost tClL-------— Describe request in detailtIvV ^ r^Liilpl j»wr •* I f,y -fire r .UnffL _____ VARIANCES RBQOIRH) Lot Area _ _ Lot Width _ _ Hardcover _ _Lot Coverage \/^ Setback: Front Side _ _ Rear _ _ Average Lakeshore _ _Other (specify)_ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _—- -_ _ _ _ _ BABDSHIP/DBSCRIPTION of unusual PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual prop«lrt conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements:/2aiiL. fLi^ U- vCyf/^ /J /Agrjg «ir-g ^ r 4 «=• TA* J. -h9_.. TT1 n't f T IfVflai e r r c ieJt* 4 t rrt. < ,>/£ d . A ^ x rt (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be s»t>niitted by the applicatlor deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete; 1. 2. Completed Application Form _Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3»_ _Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. _Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%"xll" for reproduction). 5. _ _Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8%"xll"). 6. _Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8*j"xll’*). 7. _As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application, 8. _Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance aiyplicatlon Is not ccmplete if the information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this applicatior and certifies that the information supplied is true and cqf^ect xt^x^he l>e> ->f his/her knowled Applicant's Signature r Date ONHBRS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga ­ tion and verification'"^ this* request/ ^ _ ^ — 7 - /«- 9 j 1 DateOwner's Signature Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled reeiev meetings of the Planning Coasid.ssion and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 6 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. iit DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY i \ f I * - • -W • * * •*.> m' T„ .ccordance with H.S. 13.04, Subd. 2, "Rights of subjects of data'^, we would lihe to inform you that your request for a permit or Jou to furnish certain private or confidential information. -You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requeste . 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license 3. The information may be shared with other federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit license. 4, If your requested permit or license i^c^ires Council action to approve, seme information may become public. 5. YOU have certain rights under H.S. 13.04 to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name is required to process this application or ----------E5st - Address ZiD Phone Z understand my right s statea above. qna •y■iM •••! MICN MM *•» MM (MC« NltK IA.Xf«VCR IMHI/’MM IS is-iir-;i II eoo; osois Aooscss uia&r.ir4iro fciioo CNtf SIC sail «uiH SSKOU sail lie c/o tNoiias loviit IMS ns$t sate SI see n NSIS IM S»lOI iiitaiifiii rn»itT snurisii iMummiim nr.iinfSMJ'iair tutuHu list IS 10-n/-.'I H dooi OIISO HfSIttGt ta lOHtii j jaift flat l»«u j jars I iiso Hisiiaci I a aiAviaia iti s&i«i aituai nj si<»s*-.ri sant 10 IS 10 iii-;i II 0001 Oluo HfsiTaaf la s a J /tmoM sav iii/iorr llao Ntaiiacf iai« Mav/aia itr sai«i ssos asos tiais tairraviB uart/asss NSia isKsavia Naw/asM IS Mate taiMiit laMsavts 1/ IS is-l||>si It 000^ SUM Msiiacf la a a McaicN a v c nio um a a a V c nickion IIM scsitau NavMta Ml B«t«i ts is-iis*M It sole sisas Mairara u jai«s a aifvsiB iiai jams a SNvsta isst wsttacc laic Mif/au Ml ssiai IS is-iii-ti 11 sou SIMS WSIISGt as smsMan t smiN iiai SmSNiN S SNIIN IMS MSiracc ssivi Mavtara mi ssi*i M is-ii.**ri It oois ssois aMsiss uiassiui«D savis N MINION savis N MiNroN aaat iss cinics ss t SM sr ms m ssasa IS to III 71 II OOOS oitoo msiiai.i la ausf I SfI7IIN iiai ausr I 0117110 1100 Hionarr lam Nav/ata isi IS 10 111-71 II DOil oilis tirotiar.f la 9 0 Moriturj I • J Hurrr<aN S a MoriHaii a a j itorrrun Ills Htoiiaci larM Nav/ata iti ssi<i IS IB II7-71 II oou Slios Mtoiiacf I a loxiiiii a:.r.N lOKHiii asroi lias Hiotian la Nav/ata iti ssi*i I# 10-117-71 II 001* ooois aoooiss laassiaeo MfllN S MlMllcm savis H NiNtni 0071 IDS CtHIlO so s am Sf NPIS Ml SSMt IS ie-iir-71 11 000* 010*0 Mottact la oavio N Miiiiai Sa' ID N NINfON 0077 IDS CINIIS ao s SIN sr NPIS Ml SS007 IS 10-117-71 II DOlt oliss moiiaci la -kmcin vfiToir irai JoaciN a luciiii a viuorr >iss Hfsitacc tare rtatjaia mi ssioi IS 10-117-71 11 0017 00010 apMtss uussioee oavio N HINtIM savio N NIMION 0*77 IDS CilltIO SO S SIN St MOIS Ml SS007 10 10 117-71 *7 0007 OlOlO SMOOdlNI M a i areiosoN a o n aiMtsscN at DIN I a HI UN N aiocosoN laia SNootiim ottvi Navfaia im ssioi H r.y h 00 laMMVfS total tauN DDO P301S / I* «%0 •. I * ’.SUHVCY vi'< . 96 i^X%L X*' X ' •• 4?^ X *x»x*^ ' *'/• "■it tf y'V.. • - -J A . • ^ t t - \ t f. i* • •• »• * M /ff ^ *•-i r »♦ '••• • tu*ff t I ^AMCtL Lor / • z » i. •■ • •.!.■« : ^ • .4799% tf ff a • *t4€9 -r ff 4*901 ff. 4*t*z a^ff • 0«fl«««t I>«M MsmmMWH IV ■ I ' * : « ••|*:l tii-'»> ,ii .-ti Mr-7 '.i£{ N« ynzMJfr* ____I :____1.7:^^ L_^._l__I----- * 'S-99 I ________* #1 /.I- ^Jk^^ S) ^ftUctl fl- PAHCtlL 6 4«e-!! ni'W^^wd that part of Lot 2. Block 3. FOXHIl.L. according to the recorded plat thereof. Hennepin County, Minnesota, l/ing nortlierly of the following described lino: Beginning at a point on the east line of said Lot 2, distant 50.00 feet southerly of the northeast corner of said Lot 2. ns mensured along said east line; tlience northwesterly to a point on the north line of said Lot 2, distant 107-00 feet westerly of the nortiteast corner of said Lot 2. PARCLL Lot 2, Block 3. FOXIIILL, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County. Minnesota, except Mmt part of said Lot 2 lying northerly of the following described line; Beginning at a point on the east line of said Lot 2. distant 50.00 feet southerly of tlie northeast corner of said Lot 2. as mea.^ured along said east line; thence northwesterly to a point on the north line of said Lot 2, distant 107.00 feet westerly of the northeast corner of said lot 2. cor 2 To Vacate Utility Easeoent Lots I and 2, Block 3. FOXHILL 'Ihe utility easement, being 5 feet on each side of the lot line between Lots 1 and 2. Block 3. FOXHILL. according to the recorded plot thereof. Hennepin County. Miimesolii and runs from the easterly line of said Lots 1 and 2, a d I st.'iiMu* of 20 I’nc't westerly. ----------------------r=-------- p 5 ■IfJ.g|. WM ll'lmilMil' \ \ ) ^N II \ y ir To: From: Date: Subject: Mayor Callahan & Or ^no Coundlmembers Ron Moorse. City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabuslh. Building & Zoning Administrator /kpril 22. 1993 COUNCIL APR 2 6 1993 CnYOFORONO #1813 Leonard Niska/Patrick Brickley. 2304/2308 Shady wood Road Class I Subdivision - Resolution Pertinent Ordinance Section 11.03 - Definition 65 (C). Subdivision required as lot line rearrangement involves two substandard properties. The application had originally been proposed before the Planning Commission as a Class I Subdivision involving the creation of a private easement to offset T encroachment of existing principal structure on property located at 2304 Shady wood Road. Additional Exhibits J - Kuhar Letter of April 16, 1993 K - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Brief Review of Application and Planning Commission Recommendation Please review Exhibit J. Applicant’s attorney has requested Council’s review and action at the April 26th meeting because of pending sale of Niska property. T\» application v/as originally presented as a subdivision to create a private easement to offset T** encroachment of the residence structure on the Niska property. Although the easement was presented as a temporary solution while structure remained, the Planning Commission felt the tempor^ solution was not appropriate for a structure that would obviously remain for an indefinite period of time. Some members of the Commission questioned the City’s involvement in the creation of private easements. Staff advised the subdivision regulations require the City ’s approval of all private easements. The City has approved easements over encroaching driveways, planted/garden areas, retaining walls, etc. in the past. Staff cannot remember a subdivision application for an easement dealing with an encroachment of a structure. The Code provides no direction on this issue. Applicant s attorney Jayne Kuhar had advised that Mr Brickley did not wish to proc^ with the sale of land at the time of their earlier discussions. After Planninng Commission members had reviewed the benefits to Mr. Brickley of an equal exchange of land adjacent to the lot line. Mr Brickley concurred that a lot line rearrangement would be accepuble. Because of the need to proceed as quickly as possible so as not to endanger Mr. Niska s pending sale of his property, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the subdivision to correct the 7 encroachment as long as it was accomplished with a rearrangment of the lot line. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation and is presented for Council s review and action. Isv A RESOLUTION APPROVING A METES AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT FOR PROPFRTIES LOCATED AT 2304 AND 230. ADYWOOD ROAD FILL iiO. 1813 WHEREAS, ihe City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, tlv City Council of the City of Orono (herinaftcr City Council ) has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement by Uonard O Niska and Patrick Brickley (hereinafter 'the subdividers') of properties legally described on the survey attached to this resolution as Parcels A and C (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the subdividers have completed all requirements of the City for a metes and bounds subdivision of a lot line rearrangement for division and combination purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City CouncU of the City of Orono hereby aoproves the metes and bounds subdivision of a lot line learra^e^nt for Leonard O. Niska and Patrick Brickely as shown on the Certificate of Survey by Mark S. Gronberg. dated April 21. 1993. and attached to this resolution, subject to the following conditions; 1 Upon approval of this subdivision, the subdivider shall apply to the City for the legal combination of parcels described on the survey noted a^ve Leonard O. Niska shall legally combine Parcel A with Parcel B; and Patrick Brickley shall legally combine Parcel C with Parcel D 2 The aforesaid division shown on the attached Certificate of .Survey ^ bv the City of Orono with cither the Hennepin County Recorder’s Office or Registrar of Titles Office on or before October 26. 1993 together with a certified original copy of this resolufon. Page 1 of 2 3.The subdividers are hereby advised that in order to fulfill the intent of this subdivision, that additional documentation must be created to provide for the legal transfer of Fee Title. The approval granted by this resolution shall expin* if the division has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. ATTEST Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota this 26th day April, 1993 Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 26th day of .April, 1993 by Edward J Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 2 2 j- r:f-. ’v" H.y y .IV- TO:Mayi'r Callahan and Orono C'ouik’1 Memhers Ron Moof'-e. Cilv Adminisirator FROM:Jeanne A MabuMh. Building it Zoning Administrator DATE:April 12. 1993 SUBJECT: #1813 Uonard Ni^ka. 2304/2308 Shady wood Road Class I Subdivision Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances Section 11.03 - Definition 66 - The subdivision involves the creation of a private casement to offset a 7" encroachment of the e.xisting principal structure into adjacent property. Section 11.03 - Definition 24 - Lot area minimum - 32.5 s.f. area of casement shall be excluded from lot area of property at 2308 Shadywood Road while ea.sement is in effect. Review of Lot Areas A. 2304 Shadywood Lot area = 2.971.2 s.f or .06 acres B 2308 Shadywo(xl lx)t area = 6.931.5 s f. or .159 acres Area of easement = 32.5 s.f Adjusted area = 6.899 s.f. or .158 acres List of Exhibits A - Application Al- Addendum B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - I^egal Description t>f l,a.sement E - Easement Form F - Staff Sketch G - Survey of Ivasement H - Survey for Conditional Use Pennit I - Resolution #3188 • Variance Application (Application #1755) Description of Request Applicant received approval of an after the fact condiiionai use permit and variance in October of 1992 for the installation of a storage shed in Mreet yard Review Exhibits H and i The Building Staff has confirmed that all hardcover removafi have been completed by applicant Zoning File ^1813 April 12, 1993 Page 2 The current application involves the creation of an easement to "correct" the encroachment of the existing principal structure. The southeast comer of the existing structure extends 7" into tlie neighboring property at 2308. Mr. Brickley, the current owner of 2308. did not wish to proceed with an even exchange of property areas with a lot line rearrangement and agreed to the granting of a temporary easement. TTie easement is written such that upon demolition of the existing residence, the easement shall terminate. The applicant’s attorney advised that because of the pending sale of the Niska property, the mortgage company has called for a solution of the encroachment of structure. The subdivision of a lot line rearrangement was not acceptable and the temporary easement was recommended by applicant’s attorney. As already noted above in the factual findings, while in effect the easement area would be excluded from the lot area of 2308 Shady wood. Review the staff sketch Exnibit F. Note current structure is located approximately 13’2" from the shared lot line. The easement at its widest point would be located 8 1/2’ from existing siruciure. The easement must be written such that no future construction will be allowed within the easement area. Although the easement extends 5’ into 2308, any setback for new construction on the 2308 Shady wood property will be determined from the existing plaited lot line. Because this is a private easement, it will be the responsibility of the affected property owners to enforce. Issues for Consideration A. Please review Exhibit E, the easement to be filed against the chain of title, i^e there conditions or limitations within easement area that should be included, i.e. total or a percentage of destructioa'deterioration of struenire to require owner to rebuild within lot lines. B Setbacks for any new construction on 2308 Shadywood Road shall be determined from existing platted lot line. Do members envision any problems? Rcconunendatiun Any recommendation of approval should contain the following conditions A. Enforcement of private easement shall be the total responsibility of the private property owners. B. No new construction shall be permitted by owner of 2304 within easement area. CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address S//^DVic/aP/> ^C>AI> Mrt v/i A '■Citm* _________^3^/^ S//A^yu/c)i^A u'/^V za -t A, a^a/. ic'/^A ZA rA, rs~jf/ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) P^//7-Z3- »>''V —^«?y/ /7-//7-^j- Please check one - Property ;<■ abstract or torrens? Attach legal description to application. APPLICANT Name LEfAy/tK-O Phone (home) V7/- FS'^T ///S/e: A ZiOA- A AfiAP Address: U'AV^^T a. AIA/ City: Phone (work) ^ 7"^ ij//L \/a, ^ip: / Phone (home) Phone (work) OWNER (if different than applicant) .. Name /^//VAL/S //^^PS<3oAy Address (attach : ^j^y: 14\/W)^ <C (2^t)r^ip: h list if more than one) ^^"f- ((^c^ EXISTING LAND OSS Nximber of Tax Parcels Development Size Present Use (check)>c ‘S^m-QF-dPim FIHAHCS OFFICE 13Z0200000 01 OGi 200. C Acres Dry Land C}£CK TL 200.C ! Acres Wet Land liECEIPT’THAh'K YOU Acres Total, all parceJaL.i^a?J^ COOl ROl 03,'?t Residential; no. of units Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Present Zoning District PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites:Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Units per Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use: (check)Residential Other (specify) Sc/Auev a/r p/PaA ^Ajc^oAcNAie/uT A£>Pascal, ta ^s /i 7AP AA/ AASfAfFA/p' 7^ i i MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Completed Application Form 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. 3. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350 (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). ^ . ,4 ^ r4. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official’s Signature _____________________________ - ■ - 1. Payment of fees (par)c fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). 2. Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date^- - - - - --- - - FEES S)cetch Plan Review (Class I, II t III) Subdivision of $200.00 Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) Preliminary Review (Class III s all non-residential) Final Plat Review (Class III) *(PIu8 any legal or engineering charges) Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Final Subdivision Application 300.00 325.00 + 25.00/Lot 175.00 150.00 100.00 The applicant hereby agrees to provide all requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant’s Signatu^ ^Date 4. Q~M^lU(LXA^Date ^ ^ ^Cimer’s Signature ^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an appll^nt is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please ma)ce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. c- 1 r- =•« • • -t • t SamR. KUNE.RT & TAMBORNINO ATTO«NCr3 AT LAW S^arP T SAriH PAUU AUMC*'^ JOHN TAHeOMNtNO JAYNC KUMA« $TANrOi»0 » ,nor. ooo Mt-r fk ^(>-dino u-<, r.<:>uTM Fir^M ?rmctT M.HNCAr»OLlS. M.NMESOTA loiS' 3 33 » AA I r//is vv .(399 is,. ;.v. % ApriI 13, 1993 City of Orono Municipal Offices ATTN: Jean ?;°;tarBa^ MS S5323-0066 f?oTr.aKToL: Our Pile Number; 93-060 Dear Jean: « ... vAAAnt. telephone coinniuiiication/ you had in i"furniah to you an explanation of the request forrequested that I curnian uo y when he had a survey done of his the above captioned v.*. the existing house on his property it wa. ^^•“^!”the adjoiSina piop«?y. In order to property encroached ont necessary that an easementieeolve title defects. It was necessary tn ^ authoritlnq the houi. remains on the Siska II iuc? “me L the house would be demolished the easement will expire. all o£ the parties. If you have any comments, please advise. Yours very truly. SAHR, KUNERT.i TAMBORNINO / / / /Jayne Kuhar JF:mrA Enclosure V^. cct Leonard O. Niaka CJCi+H OF oeofoy 0' c.iv£ t :«iA*;oN OftO" T4 5£E 9 \T w:s: :> wcSu»v[rOl» *>,A- f:l£.9 0<^15fV / ' •« f/ '' i / / f ''.'v ■;. oOltJ^ cf .:*s*:. o. r. se. se. 69. 70 1 n•*ii.»3-S *OCri» 1C M vL.»C£ V «:•**£’>«» Bl*0< 7-'.*: » If y:s: 0 is i -1 /VrLos^ I i/ /iTM-?6) V^;/: -’c’!';-.- ** .. !3, <9__/ V 9C ^ / if^ t\ 0W *^' “S / “N / / ^ f ^ \ ^ \/ •’a'V f^)\‘ //r /c *; - j - 51 ;® ""Ok: • *^ / -'/ / it'- 'C/c 2'1 ' '5J. ' '61 H \\ 3>^ \ ^ \ ,; ' ” \|?7 ' n; V.'t:=)'-;i*’j4 \ ♦T. 4' QQ'^4 (0 1 ^ ^ -dr ^ .* X.*5iA ‘.«/ X?/ 4*>V /(48)X. - ••■t.........'•■' I • *■ 5c ' 5c 5C y y 1U9)^ -V -- ^ - . -,.8)f ^-^l:) ?5C rsc X X y ^2* Av'£ '5 7-/Xl^f * 7; e j)/-TfJ'-' Wvt ‘ «*: « !i« 5t« 1C fTl^i;^^^ M75)/ ><?H/p>:,v‘ ''S/T—SX^-—K^ X......;., I 2 5 5 V ^ si X ;^:: 2 . “',4 , -3 ■••": ?■ 'C ?• 9 5 S 7\ 6“1 5") 'S'C^-I . ? '■■’0)v ?Ki9:i6e'i •■' ‘ ’I 65)^) ;63)i(62) •-';(6C)i ' ■ 4^-V % X X ^ ^ o?'. ri(e9:iw^< ■' • ” \^\{bc)\ ■ y y/“y ’ y y x y y Ay y y y s ^ j ^ 3j X ^ 21 ( ^5) ‘ O' • i; . — ■ Xf. ‘^3 5i 5l^ ic^ 5T ^1 ^ ^ k * JL iL , ,\ ■' U. •• X . X • ■ i S s s , .- '■ ’? *C '*‘'K'5- X. ‘s'iS ^ Q. s; B,c t e* ^?i 31 Sc'’ ^ ■y _ jc__y X % ‘‘“ ‘‘'j' y y I .1 S' '^.\ruii /-■<V- i. r—^'' jB-r"'i nCSAI (—N0— z , • i. 1-- - ~ V S9--47 y? .9 T. ^ s.-«.^ :9 — *: 1 iUN DATE OS/ZA/nDATCN DOS MOD AOOII TAXDAYCR NMC/AOOR 5D 17-117-2S TA 0001 OOOSe ADDRESS UNAS$IO€0 MCLEOD CNTY REG RAIL AUTH DAKOTA RAIL INC 25 ADAMS ST N HUKHINSON MN 55S50 NEIDCPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPcRTY OMCRS LIST ID I /•1I;'-^S AS OOCl 021Af> DAYVIEH PL KURT T OYNEK KURT T DYNEK 2195 BAYVIEN PL HAYZATA m 55S91 REPORT NO. P1AS5AD1 PAGE 20SO 17>117-2S AS 0D02 0229A SHADYNOOO RD AON Of VETS AFFAIRS A N OFTEN IMP FRANZEN 229A SHADYNOOO RO HAYZATA m 55S91 ■3’ MOD AOOR (RMER NAME TAXDAYER NAME/AOOR SB 17*117-2S AS ODOA 0229S SHADYNOOO RO R A A 0 C RYAN ROBERT A t DELORES C RYAN 229S SHADYNOOO RO HAYZATA m 55S91 SB 17-117-2S AS 0005 OSAAS CRYSTAL PL AIL ROOENALO AOELBERT M ROOENALO SAAS CRYSTAL PLACE HAYZATA MN 55S91 SB 17*117-25 AS OOOA 05AA9 CRYSTAL DL SEC OF HSG A URB DEV SEC OF HS6 A URD DEV 220 2ND ST S MPLS tM 55A01 i ADDR OHNER NAME TAXDAYER HAME/AOOR OMCR NAME TAXDAYER NAME/AOOR SB 17-117-2S AS 0007 0SA57 CRYSTAL DL J D SAMPSON A K N SAMPSON JAMES D SAMPSON SA57 CRYSTAL PLACE HAYZATA Ml S5S91 SB 17-117-2S AS 0020 OSASB LIVINGSTON AVE PATRICIA A GUIIBI PATRICIA A GUIIBI SASB LIVINGSTON AVE 8 HAYZATA Ml 55S91 SB 17-117-25 A5 0018 0SA52 LIVINGSTON IVE HILLIAH R MA)0«LL II A HIFE MILLIAM R HAXMELL II 5A52 LIVINGSTON AVE NAVARRE Ml 55591 SB 17-117-25 A5 0021 0SA5A LIVINGSTON AVE STANLEY A MOORE ROXANN BEISCH SASA LIVINGSTON AVE • JlYZATA Ml 55S91 SB 17-117-2S AS 0019 05AAA LIVINGSTON AVE FRAM( H OLSON ETAL FRANK H OLSON 5AAA LIVINGSTON AVE HAYZATA Ml SS591 SB 17-117-25 AS 0022 05A22 LIVINGSTON AVE R A SERNA ADA SERNA RAMON A SERNA 5A22 LIVINGSTON AVE HAYZATA Ml 55591 I i « .j OMNER NAME TAXDAYER NAME/ADOR SB 17-117-25 AS 0025 05A1A LIVINGSTON AVE ROSEMARY P BURHASTER ROSEMARY P BURMASTER 5A1A LIVINGSTON AVE HAYZATA Ml 55S91 SO 17-117-25 AS OOAO 0SA05 LIVINGSTON AVE S»«RVL A PATTEN SHER/L A PATTEN 5A05 LIVINGSTON AVE HAYZATA Ml 55591 SB 17-117-25 A5 OOil OOOSB ADDRESS UNASStGNED SHERYL A PATTEN SHERYL A PATTEN 5A05 LIVINGSTON AVE ORONO mi 55S91 1. £ t OM«R NAME TAXPAYER NAM/ADOR SB 17-117-25 AS 00A2 05A5S LIVINGSTON AVE SVERRE NAAGEN SVERRE HAAGEN 7SS9 PENN AVE S RICHFIELD Ml 55A2S SB 17-117-25 AS 00A5 0SA5S LIVINGSTON AVE 0 V I E N BRUCE DENNIS V A EVELYN N BRUCE 5A55 LIVINGSTON AVE HAYZATA MN 55S91 SB 17-117-25 AS OOAA OSAAS LIVINGSTON AVf DEMIIS L NEGER DENNIS L NEGER SAAS LIVINGSTON AVE HAYZATA MN 55591 A mm DATi Qi/z^/nMTCN OQSMW ADM OMCR NAHI TAXPAYiR HAMi/AOM Sa I7-U7*2S AS 00A5 0SAA5 LIVINGSTON AVC DALE R UDENDERG CAROLYN M TILLOTSON SAAS LIVINGSTON AVE NAYZATA m S5SA1 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OI«€RS LISTSa 17-117-ES AS 0070 0SA2:! LYRIC AVE tram; HROSS ELEANOR HROSS SA2Z LYRIC AVE NAYZATA MN 55SAI REPORT NO. PlASSAOl PACE SOiO 17-XI7-ZS AS 007f OSAOa LYRIC AVE STATE LAND DEPT CITY OP ORONO PARK A/1S/7A ST DEED I5A755 OM€R NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR SO 17-I17-2S AS 0000 OSAOa LYRIC AVE STATE LAND DEPT CITY OP ORONO PARK A/IS/7A ST DEED ISA755 SO 17-I17-ZS AS 0001 OSAOa LYRIC AVE STAT^ LAND DEPT CITY OP ORONO PARK A/IS/7A ST DEED 15475S SO I7-II7-2S AA 0007 OZSAA SHADYNOOO RD GRACE 0APTIST CNURCN/HAVARRi GRACE 0APTIST CNURCN/NAVARRE 2S00 SNAOVNOOO RD ORONO m 55SAI ) PROP ADOR TAXPAYER HAME/ADOR PROP A( TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR SO 17-1I7-2S AA 0000 OOOSa ADDRESS UNASSXGNED STATE LAND DEPT CITY OP ORONO CONVEYED Z/0/02 ST DEED UllAS SO 17-II7-2S AA 002A 02E1S OAYVIEN PL MOBERT'MYtlONO HAZMO 2X15 BAWIEN PI NAYZATA 5S5T1 55 17-117-25 AA 0015 00050 AOOOESS UNASSIGNCO STATE LAN9 DEPT CITY OP ORONO PARK 10/17/00 ST DEED 15A1A0 50 17-117-25 AA 0027 02225 OAYVIEN PL ROBERT A EOERLE A NIPE TERESA KOCH 2225 OAYVIEN PLACE NAYZATA m 555T1 SO 17-117-25 AA 0025 02205 OAVVIEN PL CLENENT P OIRCN JR IT AL CIENENT P BIRCM JR ANO BARBARA J SIPPRELL-BIRCH 2205 OAYVIEN PL NAYZATA TM 5S5A1 50 17-117-25 AA 0020 022A5 OAWIEH PL T J A T P HALLOGR nORV J HALLOCR TIPPINT POOL HALLOm X2A5 OAVVIEN PL NAYZATA Ml 55551 • « / \ . > TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR SO I7-I17-2S 04 OOZY 022SS OAYVIEN PL PATRICIA A aURNElCE PATRICIA A OURNIECI 22SS OAYVIEN PL NAYZATA m SSSfi SO I7-I17-2S 00 OOSO 02205 OAYVIEN PL DAVID N DEAN A DIANE H DEAN DAVID N i DIANE N DEAN 2205 OAYVIEN PLACE NAYZATA m 55ST1 SO 17-Ii7-ZS 00 DOGS D2S00 OLIVE AVE HARVIN N CARLSON CTAL JEAN L CARLSON 2S00 OLIVE AVE NAYZATA MN 55STI PROP AOOR DM€R NANE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR SO 17-I17-2S 00 0000 02SS0 OLIVE AVE SCOTT P AIDERS SCOTT P ALDERS 2SS0 OLIVE AVE NAYZATA m SSSfl SO 17-117-2S 00 0005 02S20 OLIVE AVE J T JACOOSON OLD JACOBSON J T JACOOSON i L 0 JACUOSON 2S20 OLIVE AVE NAYZATA m 55501 SO I7-I17-2S 00 OOOO 02SI0 OLIVE AVE NIRAH 0 JACOOSON NIRAH 0 JACOOSON 2S10 OLIVE AVE NAYZATA Itl S5S0I N .J MJN MTt Ol/Z*>/nMTCN OOS PMP AOM TAXAAVIM NAHE.'AOW Sa 1T-117-2S *♦ COAT 0211A OLIVE AVE LOUISE a QAV LOUISE 0 DAY 2S1A OLIVE AVE HAYZATA MN 55SA1 HENNEPIN COUNTY PAOPEATY INPOAHATION SYSTEN PAOPEATY (»MEAS LISTSO t7-117>2S AA OOAO 02S0A OLIVE AVE GLADYS HIN0IN6STA0 GLADYS NINOINGSTAD 2SOA OLIVE AVE HAYZ4TA S5SA1 AEPOAT NO. PIASSAOi PAGE SISO 17-117-2S AA OOAt D2SOO OLIVE AVE NAAGAAET A NAAGAAET A 2SOO OLIVE AVE MAYZATA IM SSSAl %J V TAMPAYER NAME/AOOA SO I7-117-2S AA 0071 02S0A SHAOYNOOO AO LEONAAO 0 NISKA LEONAAO 0 NISRA 2S0A SHAOYNOOO AO MAYZATA HN SSSOl SO 17-117-2S AA 0072 O2S0O SHAOYNOOO AO PHYLLIS HENOEASON PATRICK OAICKLEV 2S00 SHAOYHOOO AOAO MAYZATA HN 55SAI SO I7-1I7-2S AA 0071 02S1A SHAOYNOOO AO E A RUOLXN ET AL N/L EST EOMIN A NABEL RU6LXN 2SIA SHAOYNOOO AOAO MAYZATA »M S5SYI TAMPAVEA NAME/AOOA OMCA NAME TAMPAVEA OM€A NAM TAMPAVEA NAM/AOOA SO 17-117-2S AA 007A 02S2A SHAOYNOOO AO A J HAETNEA ACT HAETNEA AICHAAO J/COLLEEN T HAETNEA 2S2A SHAOYNOOO AO MAYZATA tOI SSSAl 10 17-117-21 AA 007A 02SA1 SHAOYNOOO AP M A GAOETSCH A C J GAOETSCH LOUISE A GANGELNOTF 2SA1 SHAOYNOOO AO MAYZATA ttl ISSTl TOTAL OATCN OOS OOOAO SO 17-117-2S AA 0075 02Si» SHAOYNOOO AD A E PJCRNELL APS PICRNELL ALAN A PAMLA PICRNELL AAOA ABOUTT AVE S MPLS IM 55A10 SO 17-117-2S AA OOOl 02S0A SNAOYMOOO AD LEONAAO 0 NISKA LEONiiAO 0 NISKA 2S0A SHAOYNOOO AO NAYZATA Ml S5SA1 SO 17-117-21 AA 0070 02SS0 SHAOYNOOO IW A E PXCKMLL APS PICRMLL ALAN A PAMLA PICKMLL AAOA ABBOTT AVE S MPLS tOI SSAIO SO 17-117-21 AA 01 02SS0 OLIVE AVE NANCY C RUST nancy C MLSON 2SS0 OLIVE AVI MAYZATA MN SSSfl •:»sk ■ I j RUN MTl OS/M/95 iATCH OOS NCM«PIN COUNTY MIIOOCKrV tNromWTION SVSTtH PROPERTY ONNERS LIS1 REPORT NO. P19SS901 PA«C 52 JJ 3*. ft 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTO REPREMNTtO ARE «M ACCURATE ANB TRUE REPRESENTATION )F INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS TNIS OATS ON TNE RECORBS OF THE HEWCPIN COUNTY OEPAR1MENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF NY RNONLEOBE ANB BELIEF OATI 5 i j r V m • i^' *>■ T\COI 1 IN & CjRONUtRG. INC. BUnVCYINO, ENOINEERINQ AND LAND PLANNiNO 482 A tamarack AVENUE LONQ LAKE. MINN. 85358 I / 4 73-4 1 4 1 - V f j j ^Ai:^ Proposed Legal Description for Leonard Niska over an adjoining parcel to the Southeast in Lot 14. Wiley's Navarre Addition hlennepin County. Minnesota March 25. 1993 An easement for access to an encroaching building over, under, and across that part of the following described property: That part of Lot 14. in Wiley's Navarre Addition, Lake Minnetonka, according to the recorded plat thereof, described as follows. Commencing at the most easterly corner of said Lot 14; thence southwesterly to the most southerly corner thereof; thence northwesterly along the southwesterly line of said lot to a point 20 feet southeasterly from the most westerly corner o' said lot; thence northeasterly to a point on the northeasterly line thereof distant 25 feet southeasterly from the most northerly corner of said lot; and thence southeasterly to the point of beginning. described as follows: Commencing at the most northerly corner of the above described property; thence southwesterly along the northwesterly line of the above described property a distance of 22 feet to the point of Loginning of the easement being described, thence southeasterly deflecting left 69 degrees a distance of 5 le».;t. thence southwesterly deflecting right 90 degrees to the intersection with said northwesterly line; thence northeasterly along said northwesterly line to the point of beginning fv • • “ ' c :* r . ' “t r . A »L ^ *c ‘.F t _* r- ;- KASEMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, LEOMARj 0. NISKA, d single p^irsor., is the ov<r.t:r cf a parcel of real estate located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, herein after described as Tract A and legally described as follows: Lot 24* Also that part of Lot 14 in Wiley's Navarre Addi* tion, Lake Minnetonka described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot 14; thence Southeasterly 25 feet along the Northerly line of said Lot 14; thence South­ westerly to a point in the Southwestern boundary line of said Lot 14 distant 20 feet along said Southwestern line from the Southwest corner of said Lot 14; thence Northwest­ erly along said line to the Southwest corner of said lot 14; thence Northeasterly along the Northwesterly line of said Lot 14 to the poi’ of beginning; and WHEREAS, PHYLLIS HENDERSON* a single person, is the fee owner of a parcel of real estate presently being sold on a Contract for Dead to Patrick Brickley, said parcel of real estate being located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereinaftei referred to as Tract B and legally described as follows: That part of Lot 14 in Wiley's Navarre Addition, Lake Minnetonka, according to the recorded plat thereof, de­ scribed as follows: Commencing at the most easterly corner of said Lot 14, thence southwesterly to the most southerly corner thereof; thence northwesterly along the southwesterly line of said lot to a point 20 feet southeasterly from the most westerly corner of said lot; thence northeasterly to a point on the northeasterly line thereof distant 25 feet southeasterly from the most northerly corner of said lot; and thence southeasterly to the point of beginning; accord­ ing to the map or plat thereof on file or of record In the office of the Register of Deeds in an<^. for said county and state; and WHEREAS, it has now been discovered that the Niska house as eonrained on Tract A encroaches on Tract B; and WHEREAS, it is the intention of the parties hereto to establish an easement for said house on a portion cf Tract E as contained herein; ■ A-; ,»w-' 0^ 1 .4 NOW; THEREFORE, it is mutiKiily arivcd Ihyllir. H^“r.dor- a sinjie p«:'r:ion.and P a t.: : c m •r .-k • .................i 9 N.< ' 4 rcr r>:^ purchaser/ grant to Leonard O. Nis<a as the owner or Tract A an easement for the existing house on Tract A over and across that portion of Tract B legally described as follows: An easement for access to an encroaching bui?dinq over, under, and across that part of the following described property: That part of Lot 14, in Wiley's Navarre Addition, LaJce Minnetonka, according to the recorded plat thereof, described as follows: Commencing at the most easterly corner of said lot 14; thence sorthwesterly to the most southerly corner thereof; thence northwesterly along the southwesterly line of said lot to a point 20 feet south­ easterly from the most westerly corner of said lot; thence northeasterly to a point on the northeasterly line thereof distant 25 feet southeasterly from the moat northerly corner of said lot; and thence southeasterly to the point of beginning, described as follows: Commencing at the most northerly corner of the above described property; thence southwesterly along the northwesterly line of the above described property a distance of 22 feet to the point of beginning of the easement being described; thence south­ easterly deflecting left 69 degrees a distance of 5 feet; thence southwesterly deflecting right 90 degrees to the intersection with said northwesterly line to the point of beginning. said easement to be appurtenant, non-exclusive and perpetual for maintenance of the existing house on said easement parcel. IT IS FURTHER AGREED by the parties hereto, their heirs a.nd assigns that said easement shall be in existence only as long as the existing house remains on Tract A, and shall terminate at .<uch time that the existing house Is den iished. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands this dav of 1 9“ 3. 04/13/93 15:10 612342:170 SAHR, kUSERT £ Tta“E:RNl*'.G PAGE 05 Dated: Leonard 0. Niska Dated: Phyllis Henderson Dated: Patrick Brickley STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ) this day of 1993, before ne personally appeared Leonard O. Niska, a single person, to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same as his free act and deed. (stamp) Notary iruhiic STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS. COUNTY OP ) this day of 1993, before me personally appeared Phyllis Henderson, a single person, to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that she executed the same as her free act and deed. (stamp) Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ) this day of , 1993, before me personally appeared Patrick Brickley, a single person, to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same as his free act and deed. (stamp)Notary Public -3- LEGAL DESCjrtPTi.ON OF PREMISES SURVEYED: Lot 24, A14o that part of Lot 14 In Wiley'/Navarre Addition Lake Mlnneton!/ described as follows: Deglnnln/at the 'Northwest corner of said Lot 14; thence Southeasterly 25 feet along the northerly line of salt Lot 14; thence Southwesterly to a poir. In the Southwestern boundary line of i said Lot 14 distant 20 feel along said Southwestern line from the Southwest corner of said Lot 14; thence North­ westerly along said line to the South­ west corner of said Lot 14; thence North­ easterly along the Northwesterly line of said tot 14 to the point of beginning. Miis :,urvcy intends lu show the buuiidai ios of the above described property, and the location of an existing Ijouse, garage and concrete sidewalks thereon. It does not purport to sliow any other improvements or encroaciimefits. Iron marker Bearings stiown are based upon an assumed datum. i hcfiby LCitify \\\M lliis sviivcy wns prcjmiL'd by aic ui lmilIci my ditcci suwf* I UAIE \ I t J* ! * * * . lA/h^cor. ’ cfuii4-: * A • « A/7/ tintc lof (4- 0 • » . V* ^fAOfoS€0 J/KO ^ 1 9 • . ♦ r <9 f?. ~ 9^0 w*> ✓ £‘Af<MfAyr A*-:LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES SURVEYED: of U»V . ^ ...SwJ'ly Corner^ of Uof I4 SWfern bdry liVl' of \4 Lot 24, Also that part of Lot 14 in Wiley's Navarre Addition Lake Minnetonka described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot 14; thence Southeasterly 25 feet along the northerly line of said Lot 14; thence Southwesterly to a polrt in the Southwestern boundary line of said Lot 14 distant 20 feet along said Southwestern line from the Southwest corner of said Lot 14; thence North­ westerly along said line to the South­ west corner of said Lot 14; thence North­ easterly along the Northwesterly line of said Lot 14 to the point of beginning. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, and the location of an existing house, garage and concrete sidewalks thereon It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. 0 : Iron marker Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. r 1 hereby certify llut t'.iis survey wjs prepaffd b\ nu* oi under my direct super- | oaie CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.31°O O A RBSOLOTION GRAMTING after-the-pact variances to municipal zoning code SECTIONS 10.25, SUBDIVISION ® . iO 22 SUBDIVISION 2; 10.5f, SUBDIVISION 16 (L), 10.03; sSbDIVISION^14^(CW .03,^D^ISION 12. AND SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 10 - PILE #1755 WHEREAS, SrSrono (he"e^n?fte/-crty") and legally described as follows: Exhibit "A" attached (hereinafter the property ), an WHBRMS, the "|'^®4o'’^^f^‘'%“orag^ shed^''wVi?h Orono to permit the constructi ^ Section 10.25 Subdivision requires a variance to Munrcrpa^^^ ^ ^^^^aok is 6 B) to allow a 5 side street se section to allow a front "°tS:=hV/?0^'"«tr\"rro""e"ttac\‘’%rnor:a^“ - setback of 20 wnere cubdivision 2 and Section 10.56, L“A%Ys*iori6"ar^o\i?;t h.lt hard^^^^^^^^^ ?:T“owv/r"a^: by“srruct'u°reV"or25^» ^here only 15% lot cSv«age is normally allowed, and a variance a subdivision 12 to allow a t*inV a co^nditional use10' setback is normally required, and request 9 accessory permit pet Section 10.03, Subdivision 10 to allow Structure on a through lot. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1755. 2. The property is located in the LR-lC Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The property is approximately 0.055 acre in crea. Page 1 of 7 "r n /\ CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.3188 4. 5. 6. The Orono Planning Conunission reviewed this Seotember 21, 1992, and on a vote of 7-0 recommended approval of the requested variances and conditional use permit based on the following findings: a. the garage is an improvement to the neighborhood. b.SlL«?ance'‘Vquip;Vnt°"nd secured. c.Any other location for a storage shed on '=*'• would require a similar number and magnitude of variances due to the extremely small lot size. d.Placement of the storage shed to the rear house would eliminate the only vehicle parking area on the property . e.The proposed removal of «i?ting gravel hardcover results in a slight decrease from 41.6% to 41.1% t5 1,000* zone). f.one or more of the above findings constitute sufficient hardship for granting of the variances and conditional use permit. Applicant commenced demolition of the P>^e-«3cisti^ng garage *nd construction of the new shed wxthout obtaining the appropriate permits for such work aft'.*r having of the need for such permits, and making a variance/conditional use ^fetn.t application but prior to variance/conditional use permit; approval. The City Council finds that -J^ally tooroperty are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting t variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions. Page 2 of 7 o:, o CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL N 3188 liaht. air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties; would not ^ ^ ^ convenience to the applicant, ^ut is ^ gary toa demonstrable hardship or ‘^iff^culty; is necess^^^^^^ preserve a substantial property right of Sould be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 7 The City Council finds that granting a permit to allow the construction of a 140 V':„“erhealtht on this through lot will not be aff^c^ rigr*”iiTo“pose°a fa^g^A^ S“|Sbor\^% properties^ nor will it oropertY values and that the proposed level of use of tne prol^rty^ will be in keeping with the intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. COHCLOSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the ^oniit\ona\' usfpVr^itV°<Tr Se^tfon 10.03, Subdivision 10 subject to the following conditions: 1 AoDlicant shall obtain the appropriate demolition permit for ^he g^r^ge" construction permit for the shed, and ^|ter- the-fact investigation fees for the demolition permit, construction permit, and variance application. 2 Aoolicant shall make any changes deemed necessary Building inspector to bring the storage shed into compliance with building codes. conditioned on removal of the storage shed. 13t0200Q0C 01 QE.^ Page 3 of 7 fie c/3c/f a I CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 3188 4. Hardcover in the 250-500’ zcne is approved at a level of 41.1%. All existing and proposed hardcover approved with property are placed on notice that hardcover shall not be increased above the currently approved level and any proposed improvements of this property that additional hardcover must be approved by the ^1^^* approval may result in a requirement ^ equivalent or greater removals of existing hardcover. ^11 existing hardcover scheduled for removal as a condition this resolution must be removed within 30 days of the date of this resolution. 5. Authorities granted by this resolution run not with the applicant, but are permissive o^'ly exercised by application for a building "f year of the date of Council approval, or ^^®^.sP®®ttl conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (October 12, 1993). 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the ^®^®* conditions of this resolution shall constitute a viola-irn of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7. The undersigned applicant has read, understood agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby ‘‘^ee* the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 4 of 7 III CITY of OBONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _ _ _ _ _ Adopted by the Orono City Council on this ^.th day of October, 1992. ATTE >; 4 b^thy ^vr*^llin, City Clerk BacDdSBCBBc yic xxRdccxxosxxMaiQU J^' Diann GoettenyActing Mayor Property Owner(s STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) *J. Diann Goetten, Acting Mayor, The foregoing instrument was ®« SJllin iUi»xxVc5.ty clerk of th4 City of Orono. c^i^atlon and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 5 of 7 ll CITY of ORONO A m RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.3158 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this ^7 ) ) 55 > day of fy 199 9- irana wh/appeared who execurea STATE OF MINNESOTA ) Notary Public ) ss. JM«L ^ ^ T M COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )^v»:5'‘CSSJ^ S:*Iri a Notary ,.-SIJctLlirr«^^ .^unty .-p«r»onnT7 appoarad ---------^^dascribed in and who 'executed the Notary Public Page 7 of :P EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO.3183 L£CAL DESCRIPTION: rnt 24 Also that part of Lot 14 in Wiley's Navarre Addition Lake Minnetonka deLribed as follows: f'^^inning at the Northw^ corner of said Lot 14; thence Southeasterly 25 feet in the Southwestern boundary line of said Lot 14 distant 20 feet along said Southwestern line from the Southwest -orner14 thence Northwesterly along said line to the Southwest -otnet J:? aitd lS? 14- thence Northeasterly along t;„ Northwesterly line of said Lot iJ'tfthrpoint of beginning; ail in Hennepin County, Minnesota. «OOE« ^ 5A h O PAUL KV jNEP^ JOHN L TAM0OPN»NO wArNC Au^»A« STANfOPO P ^‘LL SAHR. KUNERT & TAMBORNINO attorneys at law lOOO SOO LINE BlJILD'MG KJ-S SOtjTM FIFTM STREET MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA » eiP > 3 3 3 TAW ^44^ ^ .v>s A c»- lO . d«3 April 16, 1993 City of Orono Municipal Offices ATTN: Jean P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 RE: Easement Agreement - Leonard Niska 2304 Shadywood Road, Wayzata, MN Our File ■dumber: 93 -060 Dear Jean: As a.torney for Leonard Niska I would respectfully request that because of the impending closing of the above captioned property, the easement matter be placed on the agenda for the Orono City Council on April 26, 1993. Please confirm with me whether the Council has agreed to this request. Yours very truly, SAHR, KUNERT & TAMBORNINO JK:mrA cc: Leonard Niska APR ? 0 10S3 P"1 IW In lots CcrllfIcole of Survey fer Leonard D. MIska M and 24, Wiley's Navarre AdJltlon Hennepin County, Minnesota X N ■ * ^; *'* ■* ’ *» V Vf , ■ . // I:: *• ti.« l.»u..Jai le; of III# fcka*t <#t<rll tot 24. A>lo th«l p*rl •# t#t <♦ in yiley’jr M**rre AdVltlr* Hir.netool^d«tcrlk«4 *» folleatlt ^ ■ I nn 1 said lot ^4; llw«ce S««ike*stert3f 25 re«t alofif th# wVIwHf Iffcj « *«|4.Lot f4; tli#At4 io*tfc##fst##lf t#-,« In til# $ogth*#»t#r# P»««4#rf Ifiw «T ft. sail! lot 14 dlilMl 24 *1#^ t»P4 Southwestern lloo tfco ^***'*•**■ corner of said Ut 14; tMn«0 weslerly olong west corn#r,^f said ,y?j ™ «• ■ 'iT'- ii,iv;.rV.,'‘i.'t.»jri.".i.o. ti.i t.o..o.Vie; .f ‘nj'*"* tj'iiJtiJiK’KJJ;.. • ...d tht l.c.Uoi. .f M ..Istlng l.o»»t. «.r.g* ••< It does not purport to il.ow any other UproiewentS or encroacno# is. o Iron Barter Ocarlngs shown arc based upon an assuned datJ*. ( % I TO; FROM: DATE: / Mayor Callahan and Orono Council Members Ron Moorse. City Administrator COUNCIL MEEnNG APR 2 6 1993 r«ITOFOIOM April 20. 1993 SUBJECT: 1993 Marina License Applications ■ Status Marina license applications were mailed the third week of March with a due date of April 15th. To-date 1 have received paid applications from all except North Shore Drive Marina. None of the applications contained all of the requested information. None of the applications included a drawing indicating the locations of winter storage and required winter parking spaces. None of the applicants included a copy of their LMCD license application. Gayle’s Marina applied for and paid fees for 143 slips (the City has historically onl; licensed them at a level of 134 slips). I ikeside Marina acknowledged a range of from 30 to 30 boats stored on land for lake use. but did not correctly compute the fee to reflect those boats. In the next two weeks staff will attempt to obtab tlie required information from the marinas, anticipating that licenses will be on Council s May 10th agenda for approval. COUNOLMBIIIIG / APR 2 6 1993 OIYOFOROm TO:Mayor Callahan and Orono Council Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Michael P. Gaffron. Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE:April 23, 1993 SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 3 - Approv.J by Met Council On April 22nd the Metropolitan Council voted to approve our Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 3, which updates our Comprehe. sive Scwei Policy Plan and updates/expands the MUSA boundary, including the Lon^ La^e sewer plant property. A formal letter of approval should be arriving shortly from Met Council. Formal City adoption of Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 3 and final subdivision approval for the plat >f the Long Lake sewer property (Fleming Trail) will be placed on Council’s May 10th agenda. CONSENT AGENDA TO; FROM: DATE: Mayor Callahan and Orono Council Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator COUNaLWEIM^ APR 2 £ 1993 cmroFORom Michael P. Gaffron. Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator April 20, 1993 SUBJECT: City of Medina - Shoreland Flexibility Request Attached is Medina’s Shoreland Flexibility Request. They propose to continue their existing maximum building height allowance of 40 ’. Medina normally allows heights of up to 30 ’. which can be increased to 40 ’ in their rural residential and suburban residential zones by doubling the side and rear yard setbacks. They are also proposing that both the structure and septic set'oacks for Recreational Development lakes and tributary streams be established at 75’ (DNR would require 100 ’ setback for structures. 75’ for septic). Neither of these flexibility requests would appear to have any impact on Orono, and their justification for the flexibility seems appropriate. Staff Recommendation With Council’s approval, staff will send a brief letter to Medina and the DNR indicating we have no problems with their flexibility request. Moved by , seconded by , to direct staff to send a brief letter to the City of Medina and the DNR indicating that Orono has no problems with Medina’s request for flexibility from the Stote-wide Shoreland Standards. Vote: ____ayes.-------nays. M 'STATE Of L DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES T'lrtlft METRO IJJ^TERS - 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN PMOfIC M\J. ^ ^ ^ X «772-7^10 April 13, 1993 Jeanne Maybusth City of Orono P.O. Box 66 crystal Bay, MN 55323 APR 1 1"-^? RE: CITY OF MEDINA REQUEST FOR FLEXIBILITY FROM STATEWIDE MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT ALONG SHORELAND AREAS Dear Ms. Maybusth: The City of Medina is updating its Shoreland Ordinance to become consistent with the revised Statewide Stanoards for “Management of Shoreland Areas" (Minnesota Rules Part 6120.2500 - 6120.3900) which beca e effective on July 3, 1989. Medina has asked for flexibility from these standards in two areas. The maximum building height is proposed to be 40 as opposed to the 25 ft minimum standard and the structure setback is proposed to be the same as the sewage treatment system setback for Recreational Development Lakes. I have enclosed a copy of Mr. Ronald Batty's letter of March 31, 1993 which officially requests the flexibility and further explains the pertinent issues. Development in Medina within lOOO ft of the common resource of Mooney Lake (27-134P) is directly affected by the proposed flexibility. Minnesota Rules 6120.2800 subpart 3, item D, subitem 3 allows input from affected communities regarding flexibility issues. Please submit any relevant comments by May 13, 1993 to ensure they will receive considei'at.ion in the final ordinance review process. If you have any questions please feel free to call roe at 772-7910. Sincerely,, / Mdrty Rye Hydrologist Enclosure cc:Ronald Batty, City of Medina Attorney Ed Fick, Shoreland Hydrologist AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER i AitoriM?) •• HOWIT A. ALSOf RONALD n. Batty STCrNEN J. Bl*BLX John R D ean MARYG. DOMLNS 1 TUANIl N. C aLEY coiBLNt A. Heine James s. holmes DAVID J. Kennedy John R. Larson WELLINGTON H. LaM CHARLES L LeKCVERE HOLMKS & GRAVFN I’IIaHTKHED 4“’0 PNhl.ar; Crnler. Minnrapi4i». MlnnrwiU 55402 (612) 337 9300 KacAimilt (612i JJ7*9.'I0 WRITER S DWECT DUL (612) 337-9262 John M. LEFEVRE, JR. ROSERT J. UNDALL Lal^a IL Molixt Barra RA L Portmtood James m. strommen J ames J, Thomson , jr. Larry m. mertheim Bonnie L Wilkins C ary P. Winter D avid L. CR av TN u ijkiwi) or COUNSEL ROSERT c. C arlson RoiERT U D avidson March 31, 1993 Mr. Marty E. Rye Minnesota Department of Natural Resources DNR Metro Waters 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, MN 55106 RE: Request for FlexibiUty from Shoreland Ordinance Requirements Dear Mr. Rye: Alone with a draft of its proposed shoreland zoning ordinance, the city of unsewered areas in certain cases. 1 RiilMlne Heieht Limit. The City requests that the DNR’s_25 suburban residential di. .cts to 40 feet under certam circumstances. The maximum building height in the uroan residential district is 30 feet. Medina beUeves its request is Justified for ™^um buiidinR beigM in lj!>e^ nonconforming. ^building height. Medina measures IS1U3 iao-8 •X. . : *: Mr. Marty E. Rye March 31, 1993 Page 2 establishes a minimum lot size of two acres if the soils are suitable for construction in its rural residential areas consistent with this standard. The city was able o detrimental. 2. Structure Setbac ks in the Rural Area . The city also requests flexibility for the minimum setback requirement for structures from recreational development lakes and tributary streams. DNR rules require 100 foot setbaclw in each of these cases for structures but allow septic systems to be located only 75 feet from ordinary /* high water levels. The city requests that the setbacks bo consistent and that they be estabUshed at 75 feet. The city's justification for this request is similar to that outlined above with regard to building height. Because of Medina's pattern of ve^ large lots in the rural residential area, structures are few and the lessened standard is not likely to have an adverse impact on public waters within the city. J Your consideration of the above requests is appreciated . The city believes that it has fully compUed with all other DNR requirements in its proposed shoreland ordinance Sincerely , c^. Ronald H. Batty Medina City Attorney RHB.’ckr RUBSml MX330-) J /. TO: FROM: DATE: Mavor Callahan and Orono Council Members Ron Moorse. City Adminirtrator Michael P. Gaffron. Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator April 20. 1993 SUBJECT: Shoreland Ordinances Update COiMCtmM APR 2 6 1993 cmroFomoList of Exhibits A - Steve Prestin Memo of 1/14/93 B - Letter to Ceil Strauss 1/29/93 C - Woodland/DNR Correspondence Process Nearing Completion In December the DNR extended the deadline to May 10. 1993 for Lake Minnetonka cities to adopt Shoreland Ordinances. It appears that all 14 cities will meet that deadline, although DNR’s review is proceeding so slowly that most cities will have adopted an ordinance prior to formal approval by DNR. Late in 1992 the DNR hired former I'»NR staffer Steve Prestin as a consultant to review the ordinances as they are submitted (DNR is currently reviewing Shoreland Ordinances from 246 Minnesota local governments). Procedunilly. Prestin submits a memo with his conunents to DNR. DNR is forwarding those comments to the cities for reaction and discussion at the suff level. Pursuant to those discussions, the DNR Area HydT>logist (Ceil Suauss) makes a recommendation to the DNR Shoreland Hydrologist (Ed Fick; who sutrunarizes all the information in a recomniendation to the DNR Land Use Unit Supervisor (Ogbazghi Siuin) who will transmit to the City a letter of DNR’s approval of our ordinance with conditions, if any. Attached find Prestin’s comments regarding our ordinance, and my comments to Ceil Strauss. We have not received a formal response as yet. The only city to have totally completed the process is Woodland, basically because theirs was a ver>- straight forward and relatively simple ordinance (Woodland has only one zoning district). I am advised by Ed Pick that Orono ’s approval should be the next in line. It is very likely that any changes they would like as to make will not require immediate attention but can be added to the code as a ftinue "housekeeping" ordinance A copy of the Woodland correspondence is attached as an example of what we can expect Future of Technical Review Committee Two years aiio it was Orono’s impression that the group of 14 Minnetonka cities working together would result in creation of a single ordinance that all vould adhere to. Orono opted out of that priKcss. anticipating that this "least common denonm..itor"‘ apr*oach would result in an ordinance less strict than Orono might find acceptable Instead, the Technical Review Committee (TRC) became a forum for the planning staff of each city to compare notes and interact with the DNR. while each city created its own ordinance to address its own needs. THe^iIs?scheduIe<l mwting of the TRC occurred April 20th. It was agreed by all in attendance that the Shorel process had brought forth a common concern about mandated stormwater regulations on ll« hoMon. The general consensus was that the full complement of cities should problb^fiSSlifi tfteoct on a quarterly basis, with representatives of ail the agencies involved with stormwater management being included. However, while the TRC existed pursuant to the DNR’s Shoreland Contract Agreements, there is no single entity yet in charge of die stormwater planning process. It was suggested that the LMCD Environmental Committee might coordinate funire TRC meetings. I will advise the Council as this develops further. Update on Orono ’s Shoreland Ordinance Implementation It has been 14 months since we adopted our Shoreland Ordinance. In implementing that ordinance, the Building & Zoning Department is finding certain aspects of it create a degree of consternation for building permit and subdivision applicants. The setbacks for some of the Naniral Environment lakes have been an issue, especially in the case of recently subdivided lots suduenly not having conforming building sites due to increased setback requirements. While most of the new Shoreland Regulations merely expand the geographical scope of our former ordinances, the septic code in particuh is providing consult repercussions. Recall that within the Shoreland Zones, anytime a permit. CUP. or variance is requested, that triggers a review of the septic system confonnity . Our code (pursuant to the DNR mandate), requms that existing systems be upgraded/replaced if they are too near the seasonal water table identified by mottling. Many of our residents get a rude awakening when they come in for a permit to build a $1,(XX) deck, or rcroof their house, and find that they have to spend $8,(X)0-10.(X)0 on a new septic system. Staff is proceeding with plans to complete the seasonal water table depth analysis for each of the Shoreland properties and advise homeowners of their status as soon as possible, so that they are not surprised at some future date when they apply for a permit. As soon as we have completed our topographic mapping, a set of topographic maps with plat mar overlay will be overlaid with boundaries of the Shoreland .le, cs a deuiiled referei^e map. In this way. staff can readily and accurately determine whether or not all or part of a -iven propertv is within the Shoreland Zone and subject to the regulations Using the^ maps, laff will also' recommend lo Council whether there are any areas that can be omitted from the Shoreland Zi'nc based on topographic considerations, as provided for in ci”- ordinance ch i DNR#!'’-~rE'jIGi'i 6 TEi_-61iPost-It * brand fax trarsmiMal mono 7671# i * ttf . 2^^ r 9 ^• • A l/t\ V {(jf Ov?''o>^0 PMon.. - O'? \ ^ .I;\n .14. 1003 TO: FROM: l.d biCKDNn Regional Shore’and Hydrolcgisl Stove Prestir* ^ Consultant to the TMCD RE: ORONO LAND USE CONTROL REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE WITH DNR SHORELAND STANDARDS Orono'8 shorclnnd management controls are predominantly compliant with DNR gtp.ndarda, and. in several respects more restict.ve. However my detailed review of then has identified a few S”:ArTiAnd some Items thst, ' hrve dwided the following list into Major and Minor catr^tories tc provide some relative perspective regarding their importa.-.oe. but I do not regard the ".Major items as crucial shortcomlnss. .Vnothcr reasonable »PP;;°»«h IS ““o terms “Minor" and •SuSdested Revisions ... catr»gorlos. 1 strongly urge you and Ceil Strauss to review this list in detail and dr-aw your own cone lus ion.s. MAJOR 1) The City’s provision for allowing guest houses is not eompliant wUh DNR standards. It allows them norma si.c lots (should be duplex size), and does not contain size limits for structures. 2) Vegetation alteration provisl' .■ are deficient in two respects. First, the prohibition o«* • (OK), but it must also apply to bluff impact section does not contain a provision requiring pesticides to be used in ways that minimize shore impact zones and public waters by use of earth berms and/or vegetation filter strips. 3) The City’s controls are lacking a provision f conditional use permit for converting forested iand to another use. 4) The sizing provision for controlled access contain a minimum area requirement (width setup is more restrictive than the DNR standard) MINOR SiSiT S;S5'‘3^‘^^bl°c^■aJ?^ )r. subd..s.j.s.i. «%2) * The City's definition of "Shoreland” contains a statement indicatini? the ShoreJand Overlay Diat»*ict has been chang<?d in some areas due to topographic divides. Has adequate documentation been provided to justify these changes? I see so-io areas on the map where the district has been expanded along some atroams but is difficult to determine on such a small map whether'it has been reduced to less than 1000 ft. anywhere adjacent to the lakes. 3) 'T'he definitions of public waters, variance, water^orlented acccsiory structure or facility, and wetland could be upgraded in several respects (see check-list). Also, three terms (building line. Commissioner, t feedlot) aro not defined. 4) Streams are only listed by name, not legal description. m\ The City should be requested to provide documentation that a revised Zoning Map with a Shoreland Overlay District has been officially adopted. 6) The provision for allowing a new house to be placed to the OHWL than the required setback without a variance IS an established building line needs to have the phrase If not In a shore or bluff Impact zone* added. 7) For residential PUD'S, the open space requirements do not contain a provision requiring a. least 70% of the shore Impact zone to be kept in its natural or existing state. /O o .^^EsUo^ ;w CITY of ORONO Miinu ipaJ < >rRt» pi»st OfTKe B<»t ^6 C r>siaJ ^a>, Miiuirv>ta 5532.^-<)066 January 29, 1993 1. Ceil Strauss Minnesota DNR, Division of Waters 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55106 RE: Shoreland Standards Ordinance Compliance Dear Celt: Thank you for faxing me Sieve Prestin’s comments regarding our Shoreland Ordrnance^ As I noted to Ed Pick, in some areas I agree with Steve's suggested changes, m other areas the City consciously adopted controls that we think make more sense for us even though they didn t strictly meet DNR standards, and in a few cases 1 think he has misinterpreted Uie wording of a section. Tlic following comments are in order of his notes: Acreage for a guest house. Guest houses are a conditional use in all residential zones. By dermiUon (Section 10.02.28) a guest louse is an accessory sep^te dwelling consmicted within a lot Oiat has a p.incipal dwelling already. Section 10.20, (G) our standards for a guest house CUP, indicate that -all regular lot requirements .hall be met by Uie guest house". Although this perhaps is easily misinterpreted, in intent airi practice the City has required that a lot containing a principal dwelling and a 8'>« j*™ be double the lot area and width requited fo- the principal dwe Img. Por ’ otaT^ 140- width sewered zone, one would need a two-acre lot 280 in “‘J* ° a guest house, and the guest house would have to be located so tliat it could be subdivided off as a separate conforming building lot meeting all require I've studied our guest house definition, our guest house CUP requitemencs, that indicates how our lot size requiteinenls for singles. '"P^ single homes with guest houses, compare with DNR which we wouldn't comply is the instance of a triples or quad n our LR- C to" dislrid. for non riparian lots. We allow up to four attached " more than tiuee per acre in this zone, but such devclor.iient has “ ^ tlierefore there Ls no miniinuin lot width standard. OiKr ilian iha . arc compliant Ceil Strauss January 29, 1993 Pace 2 2. 3. Regarding the concern that the prohibition on intensive vegetation clearing does not apply to bluff impact zones, tliis was an oversight and if necessary we could add this to our ordinance. Regarding the lack of a provision "requiring fertilizers and pesticides to be used in ways that minimize their runoff into shore impact zones and public waters by use of earth berms and/or vegetation filter strips", we omitted this basically because it was not included in this section of your model ordinance, although as I look back now I see that it is in the "statewide standards" package. 1 think conceptually we won’t have a problem with this, however, it is such a general statement that it begs for specific guidelines to be enacted... Regarding our lack of a provision that requires a CUP for converting forest land to another use, this again did not appear in the model ordinance and that is why we omitted it. 1 would note that this section has me somewhat confused. "Forest land conversion" by definition is clear-cutting of forested lands to prepare for a new land use. But, what is the definition cf "forested land"? Who decides whether a given parcel is forested or not? What about clear-cutting just a building site within a parcel or lot that is wooded - will this be considered as requiring a CUP? Or, if they leave 2fl£.tree on the parcel, is it D52J considered clear-cutting j We are unaware of any commercial timber harvesting occurring in the City, and our "forested areas" are regularly being developed residentially with probably 50% or more of the trees remaining intact.... If this type of activity is considered as "conversion of forested land to another use", then I think we would find the CUP requirement to be rather awkward. Finally, note that we have purposely avoided adopting a forest preservation crdmance generally throughout the City, waiting to see how things wash out with a few other cities that have adopted one. Regarding the size of controlled access lots, the City Council consciously and with I think a very clear intent, adopted no minimum lot area requirement for such lots, preferring to control the densit)- of shoreline activity and use by adopting specific standards for such lots, i.e.: A.Limiting the number of non-riparian lots gaining access via such lot to only that number which would be allowed riparian access based on zoning district lot width standards (see attached sketch). j Ceil Strauss Januaiy 29. 1993 Page 3 7. n. Limiting the creative, of such lots to just those situa^ons wtiere the non-riparian benefitting properties are directly across a pre existing road from the access lot. C. Limiting the creation of said access lots to only those situations where the parcels on both sides of the road were in common ownership as of the date the ordinance was adopted. D. Defining said outlots as "non-buildable outlots", therefore negating an\ potential future use for building purposes. With these four controls in place, there seems to be no good reason for requiring that minimum lot area for the outlet be the same as for a building lot. After reviewing the August 1988 Statement of Need and Reasonableness, it seems m me that Orono’s ordinance more than adequately mee's the intent of the DNR in limiting or reducing the potential for overcrowding due to "keyhole development^ My sense is that the Council would not want to change our ordinance, as they gave this section quite a bit of thought. Regarding the statutory references, we would be happy to incorporate them in the code if you will provide the correct references. Regjrding the definition of shoreland and the reference to changes from the standard 1 000’ boundary where justified by topogra^thic divides - in fact, while we stated dial we would revise the shoreland boundaries where it made sense. I have yet to complete mapping the Shoreland Overlay District onto a topographic base map rthis is m progress - wc -ust spent $45,000 on a set of 1" = 100 ’. T contour interval topo maps for the northern 2 miles of the City) and therefore we have not determined which areas (if any) will be excluded due to topography. Definitions; A Wc would have no proble: with revising our definition of public waters to reference Statute Section I03G.005. Subd. 15 per die 1990 Statute Recodification. Until I received the comment sheet and did some investigating. I had no clue that Chapter 105 had been recodified into Chapter 103!! D Regarding our definition of variance, we reference statutes Chapter^: which I thi^ is still in effect. This is worded exactly as both the model ordiMnce and die statewide standards, so 1 don’t have a clue what Steve is talking about. C. Our definition of "water-oriented accessory structure or facility" is identical to that in the model ordinance and the statewide standards... Ceil Strauss January 29, 1993 Page 4 W D. Our definition of "wetlands", "wetland vegetation types" and "wetland soil types" in Section 10.55 should be adequate and appear to me to contain the necessary references to Circular 39... E. We omitted the definition "building line" (and hopefully any references to it) on purpose. Our zoning code uses the concept of setbacks and required yard?, which makes the term building line ambiguous and unnecessary. V/e would substimte "setback line" or "at the rear line of the required yard" in places where you might use building line. F. We omitted the definition of Commissioner in order that there be no conf^ion with the term Planning Commissioner. Every place that the term Commissioner would have appeared we used the term Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources. G. Our definition of feedlot is on Page 1 of our ordinance (defined as Animal Feedlot). Perhaps in this case Steve could not see the feedlot for the animals. 8 We agree that there should be some legal description of our streams - should this b® by centerline metes and bounds (an expensive process), or can we reference them by listmg all quarter-quarter sections through which they flow? 9 When we filed our ordinance with Hennepin County, we made a clerical correctio^ Subdivision 8 so that it reads "Establishment of Shoreland Overlay Distncl. "nje Shoreland Overlay District is hereby defined and established to include the foUowmg lands as referenced in the mao attached hgrefp M ExhiblL A within the City * We didn’t do a separate ordinance that adopts the official map. since I considered that to be part and parcel of the adopted ordinance... Please advise if you think our process was incorrect. 10. I ihink Steve is confused on this issue. We do not have a provision that house to be placed closer to the OHWL than the tequu^ settack without vari^ J there is an established building line". Our Council would absolutely disagree with such a concept. We do have an "average lakeshore setback" provision * distance from the OHWI. of the adjacent k- minimum setback requirements esublished m Subdivision *^, * ^ * *. construed as doing so. (Note that at the beginning of our ao^g requires adherence to the most strict provisions when mere is a conflict ^ ordinance.) It does, however, have the effect of foremg a new house to meet the greater Ceil Strauss January 29, 1993 Page 5 setback of existing adjacent houses rather than allowing it to be placed at the setback line.11. Regarding the lack of a requirement that "70% of the shore impact zone on PRD’s must be preserved', actually, our Subdivision 19 (H) (3) (E) requires that 100% of ("the entire") lakeshore setback zone (which includes all of the shore impact zone) must be preserved, except for necessary pedestrian access (stairs, walkways, etc.). I think this more than meets the "more than 70% of shore impact zone" requirements. Actually, I think Steve did an e.xcellent job of reviewing our ordinance and in the areas I’ve noted above, we are prepared to adopt "housekeeping" revisions as necessary. Clearly, there are some areas where we would argue for our position, but in general I don’t see any major problems. Give me a call with your reaction to all this and see if we can agree on a punch list of things we have to do (if any) to finalize our ordinance. Michael P. Gaffron Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator MPG/lsv tV • ckisthebe lis VC IC or 2,s^'OF ^i\)ir?-f Aro ef/sn•'^Cz.- 'Dhz^u.CsH f'< UA s /tJ. THi^ e?<Ai'<'\PL^^ •^c>/\J/AJ.G./s .2-AtsuiK?, 2oo'l^ou.lS:^ Cc^p^ y ^OT3 'Tl^CjCeArX'. A crta -t>e -SAci_ _ i/vi/t>TU. Ar. ^ro.x2oo^«-.2^ L-^T ^OF. XFt^ AM^. . _C^6 ^ i*y <-pJZJ.) ^ocr TTK? l::tF\ifipF^ cyxx>re^ .yvP ;r A T?^e(0 . j£^?zk< J rer ^ ^*S^exJAt^ _Po77 jU>rrL^/l=LP‘^^-^------- TTTZ^ C*-S(?S £^(XCfge^ ,-nUrTL/^5-^7z,A^^ ifTC ^iTpcicr/i/^ "ZCNff^C^ ^tA«^P/CAT7fM* /I A/£ t»TM €ac- /A* /r? * * I JJ ac . -srbi ' ^»TlpA«t^ I Uf.^\k fLA-I s |t<.* Ift*| Lot area (square feet) f iiu ;^tC • / ' I? .*• Riparian lots Nonriparian lots I .» Single t Bupieit- *Vkw Triplex izu,oou a^a Quad 160,000 A»A Lot width (feet) 40,000 37,12.0 80,000 nM.2-*Vo 120,000 40.000 37.iro 80.000 120.000 AiA 160.000 I I Single I 9eptee» 5;^ Triplex Quad » a I /lA»b Aiof Attou^fe /tf.vo 150 2Do 225 i/oo 150 2-00 265 VpO ' 300 HA 375 AJA 375 AiA C. General Development, no sewer: 490 •Zo*Jt l> ^ 2 4c i V -A^e—1-6— Lot area (square feet) I Riparian lots Nonriparian lots , * * ^Urn, oir •4. ^ I /a* /irj, iAA*Aj 6t /pmrv 00*4 of >W5 MfibTN ST4A%A4M I Single .20,000 07)^0 Triplex Quad Lot width (feet) 40.000 nW, 2'/o 60.000 80,000 aJA 40.000 S7,»a-0 80.000 n^i.z'^fo 120.000 r^A 160.000 A/A -^»e- (t*^/ KX“f4 Vt/e-l£ jt-S f Ac ‘Lac \a^ ZAC. •J‘ ( -j : ';■ ‘ •.* ♦- »/.) I Single . ^ P^p^e^( f* -'/(»/l V.» Triplex Quad , Lot area (square feet) 100 180 260 _______ 340 Aj A__________ Ma tilral f^.nvironmenb , sewer t 150 265 375 490 7,00 Qoo AfA A/A 1 i Riparian lots Nonriparian lots Single , . 40,000 iVB iX*0 e»pUa.Si»yt 70,000 9*7',2.0 Triplex 100,000 Quad 130,000 ma Lot width (feet) 20,000 35.000 52.000 65.000 Vdrfco 07,;tP Single siNUir )/£^,H. Triplex Quad 125 P/0 125 /Vo 225 7 BO 220 2-eo 325 AJA 315 a>a 425 A/A 410 AfA E* Recreational Development,"^sewer : A^org ; 20£)' op ’^^sttc-iLts /Ai \&-l Lot area (square'feet ) I Riparian lots Nonriparian lots # 9 A)0 AJB -»o»*4ir ■5, OA T),CMry („OHVQ.0 A t>Up^.6>r Be : . ^^>6lTfr^ OM A LoT Of I Single , 20,000 P>l,fZe> I 35,000 n*-l,z^/o Triplex 50,000 /<a I Quad 65,000 a>a I Lot width (feet) 15,000 26,000 38.000 49.000 »T O I Single I Duplex I Triplex I Quadr 75 ZOC^ 135 t/oo 195 __ 255 GeneralTJeveTopment , sewer:* i 4vv • 1 ■' 4 *■ •■ 1 75 135 190 245 2oo VDO /OK Jit. ( K ie.t-K'^c t,e-K-/ ffje ift Lot area {Bq\iaz9 feet) AJO ?)bAIFUA^ A*e 20o' •T 4 TOAJ9 l^fePT 5AM <-4- 5*2 AAeA A>AJ rcMC^/S^'Biat 77ne 4USAXpm 2oA*» /s i' I c/f*6tc n/(;>| Single Duplex I Tr iplex^i oNvf) I Quad If., e»»j*-V^ Lot width (feet) Riparian lots 2*»,©oo 15.000 26.000 38.000 49.000 Nonriparian 2 U, ftOO Q-«e 7,500 25,000 32,500 /JA MI'ft » 21 .*7 BO I I r«o Aiij I Single Duplex I Tr iplex^ie *<-I 75 fOn 135 /is' 195 MA V 1.- 75 135 19n too* (55* « irt A*»«J It .»memorandumI *Marcfi 5. 1993Z 4C ^ — / A < . i 4C e^*s ohLY »ru ‘^ir^/^;33D* ‘b/smiiTJ /4* . ^ • i.;'V« I ‘ \ '• • • •'*. ‘ • \» H ♦•J A t>\c>ery de . b OM A L^T\0^ Uo IC. ^ t> 4A>irM/«> 20 d' Au. B-Z /wif^ ro^ilibw/S^'iMir i •» r I ■ I « ' I TO:FROM:Ed PickDNR Kt;5ional Shore land II;. dro : o^ i s tSteve Frost in Consul taiit to the LMCD RE: WOODLAND LAND USE CONTROL REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE WITH DNR SHORELAND STANDARDS This review covered various parts of the City Code, including Chapters 3.7.0.9.&10, and a compliance checklist, which were all received in your office on 12/21/92. Several characteristics of the City are important to keep in mind when evaluating its shoreland management controls. First, the City is completely residential in character and its controls contain only one zoning district - Residential. Second, public sanitary sewer service is not available to any lots, so all residences use on-site sewage treatment systems. Finally, the City is almost entirely developed, with only a few opportunities for splits of existing large lots to create new residential building sites. My overall impression of these contiols is very favorable. They are the most complete, accurate, and we 11-prepared set of controls I have yet reviewed. In addition, a very we 11—prepared checklist war, also submitted, significantly aiding my review. I discovered only one relatively minor item which was not either clearly compliant with DNR standards or covered by the City's Flexibility Request. That item is discussed below, followed by two comments. > - DEFICIENCY • * : ' - " The City's standards for Guest Houses contain a 20 foot height limit, rather than the 15 foot DNR standard. However, the City’s definition of "Height of Building" is more restrictive than the DNR definition since it requires height to be measured from "...the lowest elevation of the finished grade at any exterior wall of a building to the highest point of any portion of the,- ’• roof." In my opinion, the City’s setup is essentia1 I y equivalent' to the DNR approach. However, this probably should have been... included and explained in the Flexibility Request.. .* ♦ if** * COMMENTS 1) ' The City's control s do not'contain f air ly rout 1 he''stdtcments *- "f: regarding statutory authorization, policy, .jurisdiction," - severability, and abrogation and greater restrictions. However, these are not specifically required by the DNR Shoreland; Regulations, and, since the City’s controls were prepared by its .Attorney. I defer to his judgements on these matters. 2) The definition of "wetland’ merely references the City’s wetlanu maps, which were preuared by an engineering firm several ■i. years ago. the mapping may want to inquire whether the criteria u.sed for ('ompatii)le with Circular 39. l\j •' A** • t. dated October 25,1992 to the mayors of the Ed Pick (Woodland Shoreland Ordinance Approval)March 8, 1993Page 2with referencing type statutory authorization since it gets amended and recodified so often. Therefore, I agree with Steve that tnis is a natter to leave to the legal council for each city.3. Definition of wetland based on circular 39? - I asked Mayor Nick Duff (on 3/8/93) about the basis for the city's wetland map. Nick indicated that the engineer used his own criteria and that there was probably an overlap with circular 39 types, but that it wouldn't be entirely consistent. I noted that since the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 rules will be finalized soon we weren't real concerned with whether the wetlands were identified according to circular 39. Once the rules are finalized it will be appropriate for the city to reevaluate the identified wetlands for consistency with the WCA. Recommendation I recommend we approve the city of Woodland's shoreland ordinance as currently proposed (and adopted by the city). As Steve Prestin noted, the city did a very complete job. I do not see any J.eficiencies or housekeeping concerns that need to be corrected with amendments. cc; Lloyd Knudson, Acting Regional Hydrologist . -1. • • » V- DEPARTMENT Or NATURAL RESOURCES ♦♦DIVISION Or WATERS** ♦ * *SHORELAND MArJAGEMENT PROGPV-.M* * * 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, M**' Phone (612) 772-7916 SHORELAND MANAGEMENT MEMORANDUM To: From: Ogbazghi Slum, Land Use Unit Supervisor Ed Fic)^,^Shore- ind Hydrologist Data:March 10, 1993 subject: Shoreland Ordinance Approval - City of Woodland, Hennepin County I am hereby transmitting fcr further processing a shoreland ordinance approval for the City of Woodland which includes a request for flexibility. Attached are the followings block . a draft letter of approval containing your signature X a memo from Ceil Strauss, Area Hydrologist, thoroughly ,_ _,v_ _ __ wfaro resolved.defining the issues and how they were resolved. a memo discussing items noted by Steve Prcstin, _ _ _ , • <1 t-» c 1 n a nr*e ." a memo .- - - consultant to LMCD, during his review of the city’s ordinance. ordinance reviev' check list compiled by Steve Prestin. a copy of the ordinance which as been adopted. copies of letters from the ci^y request.ng and justifying flexibility from the statewide standards. My summary of all of the attached is as follows: A.The City of Woodland is amending its comprehensive zoning ordinance to incorporate the statewide shoreland standards. Since the shoreland area covers nearly the entire corporate area of the city, the city decided to include the standards in its comprehensive ordinance. The restrictions within the shoreland district meet or exceed all of the statewide standards with the exception of the following: 1.strict application of the structure setback of 75 feet for the three lakes. Ogbazghi Sium Approval of Woodland's Shoreland Controls Page 2 March 10, 1993 flexibility for lot width at the building line, impervious coverage for a limited portion of the city,* and 4. building height requirements. 2. 3. The city has been provided with a current list of shoreland classifications. Shavers and Marion lakes are both classified as Recreation Development and Lake Minnetonka is classified as a General Development Lake. C.As pointed out in the attached materials, the city has presented its flexibility request to the LMCD Technical Review Committee and I subsequently provided a summary of the request to all 14 LMCD Mayors and City Administrators/Clerks. No objection or concerns were received during the 45 day review period. I trust that I have covered nearly everything in this recommendation to approve the City's proposal. If there are any questions or concerns, please contact either Ceil or me. Enclosures cc: Lloyd Knudscn, Regional Hydrologist Ceil Strauss, Area Hydrologist STATI Of ^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES WATERS, 500 LAFAYETTE ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 55155-4032 pmoneno (612) 296-4800 file no March 12. 1993 The Honorable Nicholas Duff Mayor, City of Woodland 2830 Maplewood Road Woodland, KN 55391 Dear Mayor Duff: APPROVAL OF WOODLAND'S SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE "V r-iA!^ :z:3 RfCciViD RSGiON VI WATERS Thank you for submitting your community's request for flexibility from the statewide shoreland rules and your shoreland management ordinance for the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) review. Your letters of September 3, 1992 and October 25, 1993 requested reduction of the building setback, the lot width, the impervious coverage requirement for a limited shoreland area of your city, and the building height requirement. Your letters and attached materials adeqt'.ately describes the situation and justifies your request. i am hereby approving the request for flexibility. Therefore, I am pleased to inform the city that the ordinance is in compliance with Minnesota Rules, Parts 6120.2500 - 6120.3900. Funding available through the adoption grant should used to help defray the city's costs of developing, adopting, and implementing this document. Please contact the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) to follow reimbursement procedures contained in the joint contract agreement between the cooperating cities, LMCD, and DNR. The Department remains available to assist the city with implementation and enforcement of the ordinance. As required by the ordinance, notices of all hearings and notices of decisions for variances, conditional uses, and amendments in shoreland areas must be submitted to the Department. These should be sent directly to Area Hydrologist Ceil Strauss at the following address: DNR * Division of Waters, 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106. Funding may be available for an administrative grants program for cost sharing the costs for implementing, administering, and enforcing the shoreland ordinance on a 50-50 basis. We will be contacting you regarding your participation in this program, provided there is funding available. I [ I AN EQL-al OPPCP^UMTV employer Th« Honorable Nicholas Duff Approval of Woodland's Shoreland Controls Page 2 You are to be congratulated for the efforts you, your staff, and local citizens have taken towards protecting the water resources of Woodland and the State of Minnesota through adoption of this ordinance. Sincerely, DIVISION OF WATERS Ogbisghi Siun, Supervisor Land Use Management Unit cc:Lloyd Knudoon, Regional Hydrolog Ceil Strauss, Area Hydrologist Ed Pick, Shoreland Hydrologist Gens Stromaen, UfCD Pan Albrecht, Oxvision Accountant f \ R r« - Z:^T H 1 : zr s I Ct I 4 F i T F- C» O Cs S. *= Cl C I T E S F* . o : iI- r-- •*- * I- fel *•’ *v ffi.: F£*5? Hmmm,wm^- Bonestroo , • 0 ,__ Rosene Anderllk& |\J| Associates fngJnMrs & Architects iw#- 4. •f* »• eiat \ A I *eSv4^« kw• %t.m> *r .0 n •p#*v-' » « la e^ *‘1 *f .a . M • 1*^ V««e • • A W#ec \ »i Ihg.* I ff ••! ' Uw»1 ;' * iVAii 4 Iff l^ff « V\ A f A ^ 4lr«Me» •! e H.V sr0> ff< » ie# 'Kffr» »C INI 1 A{ •‘f ‘mm - •% U As%JVtM^ A ^4. i*i« ki» t a rms; ^ 4n^ A .C.A r»W^ %*nc»k Af C Lt^ik •? lAMft: re*/ D n M^yfm p ''T Mim t Ai Mr* A iff^ Cat# VI# fc«Ar*« H r:^r«i 4 tdfpk^ AAIA flrt kT^ >1 r,:-; / C4U D v'woik/ f ♦ I kur •4f‘ C|«t| e t«g» M >«4^K I 'I C^ Br UMrt e V C-i»v A iMTHir M I e^et i.e^ I I April 22, 1993 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Eay, MN 553Z^ Attn Mr. John Gerhardsoo COUNOLMEEnNfi APR 2 6 1993 an Of mm Re; File No. 139C6 Old Crystal Bay Road Trail Dear John: We would like to tsUbKsh the bid date for the Old Crystal Bay Road Trail project. The project bid date is proposed to be .^et for 10:00 A M., June 4th. 1993. We have eitclosed a copy of f.e plans for the project for your review and approval. The project is to be constructed as per the feasibility study snd subsequent diKussions with the Park Commission. The majority of the pathway will be constructed 27 feet east of centerline. The exceptions will be through the City Hall site (134.91 to 24+ 97) where it will be moved to 50 feet east of centerline and across the Dicky Property (72+00 to 87+00) where it will be 63 ^ct cast of centerline. The trail alignmeni along County Road 6 will be 33 to 43 feet north of centerline from Old Crystal Bay Road to 600 feet wen. The trail will then be 2^ feet north of centerline to the park entrance The section in the park will meander northwest to tic in with the existing paved trail The roadway section along Old Crystal Bay Road will b« improved with concrete curb and gutter, a paved shoulder and storm sewer. The area south of Watertown Road is an exception and will be bid as an alternate which can be added if desired by the City Tie roadway section slong County Read 6 will be improved a paved shoulder storm sewer and a bituminous curb. TTie project schedule is proposed to be as follows Approve Plans and Specificatjonv Receive Bids Award Contract Street Construction Complete Constructlor. April 26 1993 June 4, 199.^ June 14, 1993 June 21, 199.t September 17. 1993 - S> :. J. fate I F* I*: — ar 5: ~ 3P T H U l C » 2: ❖ I; O »-4 E SJ T R O O M S: S: O C 1 M T E S:. F^. City of Orooo Cty-sttl Bfty, MN Rc: PiJe No. 1396^ Apjil 22. 1993 I & ■1;'':^k:' E-ii! * ?lo«se lot o^o kaowJf tbtro tn aay additloo»l modtfieatio&> dtiirod. Wt will be lubmittiai the phHM to Mi/DOT for appirofval aext week. Youit veiy tnily, BONESHiOOb ANDERLIK & ASSOCUTES. INC. Oleno R. Cock GRCIi Eoel UMeer Fa|e 2. 1 ' ' i ‘1 « 4t111' i 1 *1 4 1 1 1 1 } V vvV \ ' \*4 ■ V- V^/ ^__V#> A ' .vW VN. / To: From: Date: Subject: Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator COUNOLIIIEEIIlie April 22, 1993 APR 2 6 1993 CnYOFOMM Park Commission Appv;intment The Council has now completed interviews of the applicants for the vacant position on the Park Commission. The Council may at this time make the appointment. The appointmem is to fill an unexpired term created by the resignation of Phil Bradley. The term will expire on December 31, 1994, I h COUIKILIIIEEnNO^^ APR 2 6 1993 CITYOFORONO A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING OLDER AMERICANS MONTH WHEREAS# older Americans are significant members of our society, investing their wisdom and experience to help enrich and better the lives of younger generations, and WHEREAS# the TAMARACK SENIOR CENTER has acted as a catalyst for mobilizing the creativity, energy, vitality and commitment of older residents of Long Lake, Orono and Medina, and WHEREAS# through the wide array of services, programs and activities, senior groups empower older adults of the Orono area to contribute to their own health and well-being and the health and well-being of their fellow citizens of all ages, and WHEREAS# on Thursday, May 13, the Tamarack Senior Center will celebrate Older American Month and the 3rd Anniversary of the Tamarack Senior Center. Now therefore, the Orono City Council, does hcrc'^v proclaim May of 1993 as Older AlMrlcanE Month and call upon all citizens to recognize the special contributions of the Senior groups participants, and the special efforts of its staff and volunteers who work every day to enhance the well-being of the older persons in our city. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held April 24, 1993. ATTEST: Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk TAMARACK SENIOR CENTERSt. George Church, 133 South Brown, Long Lake, MN 55356 476-2554 Serving Long Lake, Medina and Orono ENCLOSED IS A PROCLAMATION HONORING THE SENIORS FROM THE AREA DURING MAY WHICH IS OLDER AMERICANS MONTH. WE WOULD LIKE FOR YOU TO PUT THIS AS AN AGENDA ITEM ITEM FOR THE NEI<T MEETING. WHEN IT IS SIGNED WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL ME AT 476-2554 SO THAT I CAN PICK IT UP. WE WOULD LIKE TO READ IT AT OUR THIRD ANNIVERSARY PARTY ON MAY 13, 1993. SINCERELY, UOYCE K. FLURY COORDINATOR AntoatAMor SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES A UNTTEO WAY ACXNCY mi IMCILMBnNG APR 2 6 1993 OTYOFOMWO /3. A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING WESTONKA SENIOR CENTER WEEK MAY3-7 WHEREAS, we need to realize now, more than ever, what a resource our older Americans are. and that the abilities of older Americans to invest our country with their knowledge, creativity and experience caimot be denied; and WHEREAS, senior centers offer valuable service to the conununity in providing our senior citizens the benefits of good fellowship, encouragement and support, the opportunity to help themselves and each other, and offering service of access to community services as needed; arxl WHEREAS, the month of May has been proclaimed Older Americans Month, and communities across the country are giving special recognition to the role of senior centers; NOW, THEREFORE, the Orono City Council, does hereby proclaim May 3rd through May 7th as Westonka Senior Citizens 27th Anniversary Week in celebration of past acomplishments and encouragement for continuaticn of involvement and contribution to our Westonka Community. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Crono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held April 26, 1993. Edward J. Callahan. Jr.. Mayor ATTEST Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk I Senior Center home of the WESTONKA SEN«0B OTIZEKS. .NC • 5600 LVNWOOD boulevard mound. MINNESOTA 55304 6U-A72-U3A7 April 15, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Council Members: The month of May has been designated by the govern­ ment to be Older Americans Month. The Westonka Senior Citizens Center will celebrate the week of May 3rd through 7th as Senior Citizens Week. We are offering a week-long series of events to mark the occasion, hoping our friends in our four communities will come and sha»-e the festivities with us. You will be receiv­ ing a special invitation to our Business Friends Breakfast during that week. We would appreciate having the mayors of our four cities proclaim the week of Mav 3rd through 7th as Westonka Senior Citizens Week. Sincerely, } Doris LeGault, President f 0 19S3 A Non profit Orgsnustion Serving The Communities Of Mound % Orono # Spring Park % Minnetrists TO: FROM: Ron Moorse, City Administrator Dorothy Hallin, City Clerk IMCaHETINfi OATI: April 19, 1993 SUBJECT: Step Adjustment - Lin Vee Deputy Clerk APR 2 6 1993 CnYOFOMMO Lin Vee, Deputy Clerk will complete three years of employment on April 23, 1993. She has continued to expand her knowledge, especially in the use of the computer system. Her knowledge is an excellent r?? source for the other staff persons using the new computer system. Urid'r the City's Compensation Plan, based on an acceptable level of performance, Lin is eligible for a step adjustment from Level 4, ep III ($12.049/Hr) to Level 4, Step IV ($12.603/Hr) effective April 23, 1993. It is recommended that Lin Vee's salary rate be adjusted as reguested effective April 23, 1993. To: From: Date: Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator \ April 23, 1993 meeting APR 2 6 1993 cmroFflMN Subject: Work Session to Review Planning Commission Applicants The Council has now completed the process of interviewing the Planning Conunission applicants. The Mayor has lAiggested that a work session be scheduled for Thursday, April 29 at 7:30 a.m. to discuss the qualifications of the various applicants. Please check your calendar so that the work session can be confirmed at the April 26 Council meeting. COUNCILMEEiqiGr/ TO* PROM: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator APR 2 6 1993 orroFOMM DATE:April 22, 1993 SUBJECT: Meeting with the Mediator to Discuss the Highway 12 Mediation Process The mediator for the joint Highway 12 mediation process has contacted me to schedule a meeting with the Council to begin to move ahead with the mediation process. This meeting will be to discuss ground rules for the process and to discuss how the process should proceed. The mediator has provided me with a list of dates and times (either early morning or late afternoon) when he is available to meet. Please check your calendar so that a meeting date can be selected at the April 26th Council meeting. Possible Dates and Times for Meeting with the Mediator Tuesday, April 27 - morning Wednesday, April 20 - morning or afternoon Thursday, April 29 - afternoon Friday, April 30 - afternoon Monday, May 3 - morning or afternoon Tuesday, May 4 - morning Wednesday, May 5 - afternoon Thursday, May 6 - morning or afternoon Friday, May 7 - morning f LIST 0? LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR MEETING OF April 26, 1993 Septic System Installers: Garbage Haulers: Hayes Excavating 263 82nd 'street SE Montrose, MN 55363 COWaUBIM APR 2 6 1993 CITY OF (MONO McCarty Water & Waste 6250 Highway 12 West Maple Plain, MN 55359 Blackowiak & Son Sanitation & Rolloff Servic 1195 Sur^’ field Road N Mound, Ml. 55364 Cleanway Sanitation, Inc. P.O. Box 220 Long Lake, MN 55356 Cl l/l i>f OUONO (6121 4<73-7357 Post '^t‘fice Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERS LICENSE APPLICATION All questions must be answered. License fee, -bond, certificate of insurance, and evidence of MPCA CertKiMbatibn ‘must be attached. All applications are subject to a ten (10) day approval period. 1. 2. 3. 4. Business or trade name ^ ^^ ^^ <20- U<Z 7^) Business address ^ (o 3 S ^'n SS'JLB Business phone jiWiF Residence phone ^ ~ 3^ / Name of applicant or company representative holding MPCA certification C ^9V) 5.Type of certification held; Certificate expiration date X Installer Pumper 6. 7. Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? Most recent year /9 9 Have you ever had a license revoked? When? __________ Where? _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 8 . 9. Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yes Do you pump out septic tanks? Yes _ _ _ No JL/O CITY OF OROh‘0 FIRARCE OFFICE '‘11500000 01 SP? 50.00 4 o CHECK Ti 50.00 hECEIFT-rfm YOU M266H40 cool $2000.00 license'and permit bond naming City of Orono obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accepted. 3. $50-100-300,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance. 3:^ SUBMITTALS REQUIRED: y/^. $50.00 License application fee. LICENSES A Certificate. OCESSBD UNTIL ALL ITEMST ARB SUBMITTED List persons otter than appiicar^ who are authorized by you to apply for permits under your license _ _ _ _ _ _ __ The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of Orono, Minnesota, for a license to install and repair septic systems, and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws of the State cf Minnesota and the Ordinances of the City of Orono. Date - 3 — 9 3 Applicant's Sicjiature CITY USB ONLY Staff recommendation Approval Reason for denial: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ City Council Action Date license mailed Ttl Denial Date Date Approved Denied CITY JrOKONO u\- • *'1 (612) 473- Post Offic^J^ox 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLEI LICENSE application 'APR l 5 All questions must be answered. License fee, bond, certificate of insurance, and evidence of MPCA Certification must be attached. All applications are subject to a ten (10) day approval period. 1. 2. 3. Business or trade name Business address /hAJ Business phone V jR"'HResidence phone Name of a certification representative holding MPCA 7. 8. 9. Type of certification held: ______ Installer Pximper Certificate expiration date L>j9S/ienJ Have you ever h^d a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? Most recent year <7A Have you ever had a license revo)ced? /7 ^_ _ When? _ _ _ _ __ Where? _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- Do you do Municipal Sewer hoc!.-ups? Yes Do you pump out septic tanks? Yes X y ary of om^ submittals required1 1. $50.00 License application fee. ^ 2. $2000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Ckm " ii umiPT-nm rigo,, $2000.00 license and permit nona naming uity oi uirono obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be «ccep^d. u 3. $50-100-300,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance. -^5^ 4. Copy of current MPCA Certificate. iS'T'W LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARB SUBMITTED List persons other than applicant who are authorized by you to apply for permits under your license - - - - The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of Orono, Minnesota, for a license to install arJ repair septic systems, and/or pump out jeptic tanks, subject to the laws of the State of A’; ("'.esota and the Ordinances of the Date Applicant's Signature City of OroM, CITY USE ONLY Staff recommendation Approval Reason for denial: Denial Date City Council Action Date Date license mailed _ _ _ Approved Denied CITY OF ORONO ?.0. Box 66 / Crystal Bay/ M 473-7357 \ 5 5 3 2 3 License Year J::-:.’ ?, 51 94 Date Received _ Fee Paid _ _ _ _ _ Initials GARBAGE 4 REFUSE COLLECTOR’S LICENSE APPLICATION APR 1 6 - , j • t-he nd’cated business in the City or -uJenJe to do so. Crono and Business/Pirm Btxckoiciak 6 Sc>\ S Scwicc Address. 11 SmWtetci Kd.JL------------------------------------------{State) Business Phone Number 472- 3395—---------------------------- 5^:>r (Zip Code) Applicant's Naune F-tauf; BtuckcKUdf^—------- Address )?55 SunnuUe.ld Rd N f.\cLui±Ml (Street) Phone Number 472-2977 (City )(State) (Zip Code) ChecJc One:Individual •X Partnership Corporation Number of Vehicles to be used in Orono _J6 iiT Y OF or<mDescription of Vehicles (attached lis>_ i ncfirp Loaded Leaded ^ ^ dv Ip wr. Size/Vards Li cenYear Mfar. Gross wt . Ke ^-------- —------------------ O a 4:h 1~oo &o O" 01 QEH 12. C (SEE ATTACHEP LIST' umvuuuu -i«£;v 120.C General area of City served AU d Creno <>yrc .P>t NciFh Frindolii ms Tjn70000001 12 L schedule of Collection charges/ dates f'.frfr«ifP mfH a I wwv Approximate number of customers in Crono SOC AppAOxitnaXzhj wwv Oi OEH71 j^LLUFi-mm 12.1 120. C YOU Location of dumping area H....c-PFant -cn MoLi. a>td fifht roV'T^Ts'M7LI«VlVN'TO^ *00 MOST ENCLOSE TBE POLLOtTING. rmthroVnVrin^oVeVa't'o’r of the above business and I have P^id all licei.s •a“S«. required by law. The above information is correct. fees Applicant Ai'iti' 14, ?99 3 Date PO «TT OSB only: of application, Approval _ __ Len^ai - - - - -- / • \ Sl^tiatura of City official Da'-e CITY OP. ORONO P.6. Box 66 Crystal Bay^ MN 55323 473-7357 r n I License Year Date Received Fee Paid ____ 1993 Initials GARBAGE t REFUSE COUECTOR'S LICENSE APPLICATION APR 1 6 1SS3 Th« undersigned wishes to operate the indicated business in the City of Orono ano herewith makes application for a license to do so. (Street) Business Phone Number (City) 479-2003 Buslness/Flxm rr.KANMAY sanitation inc -------------------------------------------77777 Address ' P.u . 220 LQT^LftKE-----------m (State) (Zip Code) Applicant's Name DOUGLAS hawkinson Address 865 tpwnline bt (street) Phone Number 479-2003 (City)(State) (Zip Code) Chec)c One:Individual Partnership Corporation ONENumber of Vehicles to be used in Orono Description of Vehicles (attached list if more): Loaded Loaded yar Mfqr. Gross Wt. Rear Axle Size/Yards 1984 FORD 46,000 34,000 20 YD License Number YU90141 General area of City served northeastern PART OF CITY- - - --- - - - -CITY OF Schedule of Collection charges/ dates - - - - - Approximate number of customers in Orono -50- - - - - - - -^Y^QO Location of dumping area EPR,INC _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ZN OHDER FOR THIS APPLICATION TO BE COMPLETE, TOO MOST ENCLOSE THE FOLLOMINC Surety bond in the amount of $1,000. Proof of insurance $100,000-$300,000-$50,000, and 10-day (if applicable).$30.00 flat rate fee, plus $15/truck, and_aJ_30^.^0_0_^transfer^f I am t^owner and operyor of the above license f and Wea requima^^^JT Law. The above information is correct. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ pplicar* _ _ _ _ revigw^of^application, »t.ff^reco^«nd.. (Lj.~ f V' - - -— signature of City Official Date a « 04/11/f3 pn Cl PRftCQOI 169 04/30/03 PR CM PRIIEGORIMP • NAMi 471M9060 ANDERSON. BRUCE L 474M3339 BOBZIEN, SUE A 471140171 BOSMA, iAMIE L 47S443I62 BRINKHAUS, JOHN F 472fO;|tl CNCSWICK, OARV B 4SBS2t03t CORNICK. JAMES L oclancy ; jane e •MMlOll ENOUSH'^lllf^IRVINQ 4m|o19B9 FtSCHENlCN*^DAN*T 007S99424 PRITZLCR. iONN M ARR oIfiH xS^W4oS*®JOMN r400097994 OOMAN. DAvto J 0J4007912 OREQOAv. JAMES D 47S9001S1 NALIIN. DOROTHY M 4Z1SOOOOO NANSEN^ STEVEN C 479444249 HANStNi. CAROL J 477403977 HASEMAN. CAROLE »ii8i?5 ssart-siss^g"* - 4?7fi>9?ll 409000939 OBCRAX^NERy^SCOTT Q 47079|||1 OBRIEN, RANDY L 470700101 OMAN. LYLE E 409949107 PALMAR, GREGORY A ATfllail! J 479909177 STEFPENNAGEN. RONALD!!I2!SS2? iV^Viy^N. Stephen x472S0|M1 THOMTON. MIRK R «74003{i0 TOMCNECR. LAWRENCE F 470704104 TOMCZYK. MARK W 479909202 VANG. bAucE LiUSStt! . 477991930 WECKMAN, STEPHEN J VTDDPT GROSS 31 13943.94 31 9235.30 12 4997.09 42 12954.92 31 13447.99 31 13129.55 03 56 05 31 11104 99 31 13149.34 31 12993.59 31 13200.09 31 13175.72 33 11751.99 42 10392.93 35 1595.27 42 10941.22 12 10123.94 42 9930.50 31 4714.3S 12 7343.04 31 13490.97 31 1793.31 19 9111.72 19 17299.01 33 14717.25 31 10109.19 12 19239.99 31 12779 92 35 1159 74 42 9713.99 92 9997.39 33 11751.09 42 9990.95 02 11991 93 92 9957.90 31 3949.32 42 9733.92 93 10123 94 31 19423 99 31 12214.29 31 12145 20 31 12949 29 33 10123 95 12 7750 90 IS 7012.57 33 9919 44 CURRENTGROSS 1977 1014 591 1911 1990 1509 56 14911954 1569 1509 1049 1473 2172210 11931290 1154 540 9131999 119 1014 2197 19451451 2511 1569 149 11091154 1473 1029 1399 1245 520 1319 12992059 1903 1599 1599 1299 0931179. .19 .94 .20 .99.99 .79 .05 4646 4077 99 44 4349 05 29 30 94 20 03 53 93 90 221994 40 10 3139 43 12 35 79 72 97 2920 II 31 40 29 91 90 EMP 9 NAME DPT YTDGROSS CURRENT GROSS 469199014 19324977 470399099473949272 479527196 CALLAHAN. EDWARD J QOETTEN, J.DIANN LJABBCUR, GABRIEL KELLEY. CHARLES 11 1111 11 11 1200.00 999.69 099.99999.99 999.99 300.00 241.07 241.97 241.07 241.B7 1.200.09 ■ •■I 1117 92 59.439.14 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED. APR U. 1993. t;$l PM CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMwJNT27642<•>1993/04/14 64,liroo"64.119.00*27143<•>1993/04/14 $56.40656.40* 27144 <•> 1993/04/14 66.947.44 66.947.44* 27645 <•> 1993/04/14 62.716.47 62.716.47* 27646 <•> 1993/04/14 636.373.16 636.373.16* 27647 <•> 1993/04/14 61.116.00 61.116.00* 27646 <•> 1993/04/14 *137.66 6137.66* 27649 <•> 1993, 4/14 6164.00 6164.00* 27650 <•» 1993/04/14 630.00 630.00* 27651 «•> 1993/04/14 65.59 65.59* 27652 <•> 1993/04/14 62.712.45 62,712.45* 27693 <•> 1993/04/14 6100.00 6100.00* 27654 <•> 1993/04/14 1100.24 6100.24* 27655 <•> 1993/04/14 6643.46 6943.46* 27656 <•» 1993/04/14 654.00 654.00* 27657 <•> 1993/04/14 63,425.56 63.425.59* 27856 <•> 1993/04/14 621.00 621.00* 660.723.93* ACCOUNTNUMBER INVOICE NO_ __ _ _ _ _ descriptionCITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION WH AND TRANSFERRED 4/1I 9999-2030 000236 C»«ERC1AL LIFE INS IMS WH 4/U 9999-2030 000232 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LA WH FED MEDCR FICA 4/11 9999-2030 000231 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LA CITY SHARE FICA/MEDCR 4/1 9999-2030 000237 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LA NET PAYROLL TRANSFER 4/11 9999-2030 000235 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE DE COMP WH 4/11 9999-2030 000245 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT A MARK THOMTON IC02667I0 WH 9999-2030 000233 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT A DALE SKREEN iC0262310 WH 9999-2030 000234 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 WH DEF COMP 4/11 9999-2030 000240 MINNESOTA BENEFIT INS WH 4/11 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE STATE TAX WH 4/11 MN STATE RETIREMENT-DEF C DEF COMP WH 4/11 PEBSCO/OBRA otf COMP WH 4/11 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS DEF COMP WH 4/11 PERA LIFE INS PER A UNITED WAY INS WH 4/11 PERA WH 4/11 CHARITY WH 4/11 9999-2030 000244 9999-2030 000239 9999-2030 000241 9999-2030 000246 9999-2030 000247 9999-2030 000241 9999-2030 000242 9999-2J30 000243 PM* 1PONUMBERMANUAL”ip” Mt 1 (COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED. APR 14. 1993. 1-51 PM ACCOUNT . .DESCRIPTION NUMBER INVOICE NOCHECK HO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR . . . . . . . . . .!l!:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .srur00'‘‘ciTrC0UNTrCRE0iT UNION WH AND TRANSFERRED 4/11 9999-2030 000230$4!ii«.oo*INS WH 4/11 ptRt 1PONUMBER27142 1993/04/14<•>27943 1993/04/14<•>27944 1993/04/14<•>27949 1993/04/14<*>27946 1993/04/14<•>27947 1993/04/14<•>27949 1993/04/14<•>27949 1993/04/14<*>27990 1993/04/14<*>27991 1993/04/14<“>27992 1993/04/14 <•> 27993 1993/04/14 «•> 27994 1993/04/14 <•» 27999 1993/04/14 <•> 27999 1993/04/14 <■> 27997 1993/04/14 <•> 27999 1993/04/14 <*> 9999-2030 000232 9999-2030 000239999.40 COMMERCIAL LIFE INSSS9.40*99 947 44 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LA WH FED MEDCR FICA 4/11 99*.947!44»92 716 47 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LA CITY SHARE FICA/MEDCR 4/1 9999-2030 000237 92;716:47«936 373 16 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LA NET PAYROLL TRANSFER 4/11 9999-2030 000235 936I373.19*91 119 00 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE OE COMP WH 4/11 9999-2030 00024591!i19.00«9137.96 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT A HARK THOMTON 9C0266790 WH 9999-2030 0002339164.009164.00*HENNERIN COUNTY SUPPORT A DALE SKREEN 9C0267310 WH 9999-2030 000234 IP930.00930.00*ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 WH DEF COMP 4/11 9999-2030 000240 IP95.5995.99*MINNESOTA BENEFIT INS WH 4/11 9999-2030 000244 If92.712.4592.712.45*MINNESOTA OEPT OF REVENUE STATE TAX WH 4/11 9999-2030 000239 IP 9100.00 9100.00* MN STATE RETIREMENT DEF C DEF COMP WH 4/11 091)4-2030 000249 IP 9100.249100.24* PEBSCO/OBRA DEF COMP WH 4/11 9999-2030 000246 IP 9643.46 9943.46* PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS DEF COMP WH 4/11 9999-2030 000247 IP 954.00 954.00* PERA LIFE INS INS WH 4/11 9999-2030 000241 IP 93.425.56 93.425.56* PER A PERA WH 4/11 9999-2030 000242 IP 921.00 UNITED WAY CHARITY WH 4/11 9999-2030 000243 IP 960.723.83* COUNCIL CHCHECK NO CI27142<•>27943<•>27944 1<•>2794$ 1<•>2794B 1«•>27947 1<•>27949 1<•>27949<•>]27950<*>27951 <•> 27992 <•> 279S3 <•> 27954 279S9 <•> 27959 <•> 27957 27959 <•> 27l4t<•>1443/04/14 4144.001144.00"HCNNE4IN COUNTY SUPFOOT A DALE SKREEN 4C0242310 WH 0 r> O C M1000234 IF27ISO<•>1143/04/14 430.00 430.00"IC. 4 RETI4EMENT TRUST-457 WH DEF COMP 4/11 4944-2030 000240 IF27ISI <•> 1443/04/14 45.5445.54" MINNESOTA BENEFIT INS WH 4/11 4949-2030 000244 IF 27152 <•> 1443/04/14 42.712.45 42.712.45" MINNESOTA TEFT OF REVENUE STATE TAX WH 4/11 9999-2030 000239 27153 <•» 1443/04/14 4100.00 4100.00* MN STATE RETIREHENT-DEF C DEF COMP WH 4/11 9999-2030 000244 !»■ 27154 1443/04/14 4100.244100.24" FEBSCO/OBRA DEF COMP WH 4/11 9999-2C30 0C0246 IF 27155 <•> 1443/04/14 4443.44 4443.46" FEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS DEF COMP WM 4/lt 9999-2030 900247 If 27154 <•> 1443/04/14 454.00$54.00" FERA LIFE INS INS WH 4/11 9999-TC30 000241 IF 27157 <•> 1443/04/14 43.425.54 43.425.54" FERA FERA WH 4/11 9999-2030 000242 IF 27451 <•> 1443/04/14 421.00 421.00" 440.723.43* UNITED WAY CHARITY WH 4/11 9999-2030 000243 IF <•>1137.«e*27t4t<•>1M3/04/14 $134.00$144.00*HENNCflN COOHTV SUPP03T A DALE SKREEN 300262310 WH 9999-2030 000234 IP27ISO<•>1M3/04/14 $30.00$30.00*ICMA 3ETIRCMEMT TRUST-457 WH DEF COMP 4/11 9999-2030 000240 IP 27ISI <•> 1133/04/14 $5.50$5.50* MINNESOTA BENEFIT INS WH 4/11 9999-2030 000244 IP 27IS2 <•> 1333/04/14 $2,712.45$2,712.4$* MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE STATE TAX WH 4/11 9999-2030 000239 IP 27IS3 1333/04/14 $100.00 $100.00* MN STATE RETIREMENT-OEF C DEF COMP WH 4/11 9999-2030 00024$IP 27t$4 <•> 1333/04/14 $100.24$100.24*PEBSCO/OBRA DEF COMP WH 4/11 9999-2030 000243 IP 27ISS <•> 1333/04/14 $343.43 $343.43* PEBSCO/US CONF Of MAYORS DEF COMP WH 4/11 9999-2030 000247 IP 27IS4 <•> 1333/04/14 $54.00 $54.00* PERA LIFE INS INS WH 4/11 9999-2030 000241 IP 27SS7 <•> 1333/04/14 $3,425.5$ $3,425.56* PERA PERA WH 4/11 9999-2030 000242 IP 27ISI <•> 1333/04/14 $21 00 $21.00* UNITED WAY CHARITY WH 4/11 9999-2030 000243 IP •MiWiirrr• ■tliTi•KIiMiTr»MiTiTi>rrr n*Mi f •JtliMiTiTi DtUMtliTi iKiiMtliTi • ■ilf ◄ ◄ .■ill llcIlMlll•feliHtKI :ut iltliHlIi IiMiliiviiHiimilcTiMt ill ikliMi I i iliITMiliIi ilcIvHiIili ilcTiHili I ^irnwr^Ti itcliHiIi iiaiHinn COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER FRI. APR 9, 1903. 9:19 ?MCHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR p«99 1DESCRIPTIONACCOUNTNUMBERINVOICE NO PO» JMBER MANUAL27I3R<•>1993/04/091993/04/09 163.90963.90 9127.90*INTEGRATED COMM SYSTEMS I INTEGRATED COm SYSTEMS I MNT PHONE SYSTEM FEB MNT PHONE SYSTEM MARCH 0099'43420099-4342 1283412I3S27137<•>1993/04/04 t%.197.509S.197.50‘METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMI SEWER AVAILABILITY CHQ 9001-2226 00023127939<»>1993/04/09 91,209.21.209.21*I6.S33.S9*MN STATE TREASURER SURCHARGES QTR 1 9001-2222 0f>230 r 0099-4231 000467 OH0249-4233 9272-18 OH0099-4343 9267-i:OH0490-4520 000510 OH0493-4520 000510 OH0494-4520 000510 OH0129-4356 000466 OH0590-4902 56736H OH0590-4902 1S755 OH0494-4520 12419 OH0200-4305 023946 OH0359-4305 023946 OH0569-4305 023946 OH0200-4304 023946 OH0940-4305 023946 OH 0249-4305 023946 OH 0427-4305 023946 OH 0249-4305 023947 OH 0409-4305 023949 OH 0439-4305 023646 OH 0355-4305 023966 OH 0439-4306 023967 OH 9673-1500 023969 OH 0409-4306 023965 OH 0409-4306 023965 OH 0396-4530 7547 OH 0490-4306 9769 OH 0494-4306 9769 OH 0632-4540 119404 OH 0249-4233 000499 OH 0129-4356 C00469 OH COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED. APR 21. 1993. 9:26 PH P*9« 2RM* I CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT27tTR<•>27IT7<•>27171<•>1M3/04/261993/04/261993/04/261993/04/291993/04/291993/04/291993/04/29 921.7394.999.2294.999.95*991.30$15.09993.39*91.037.1991,037.19*9526.759529.75*9259.00$259.00*VENDORCITY OF LONG LAKE CITY OF LONG LAKECITY OF LONG LAKE CITY OF LONG LAKECITY OF ORONO COCA COLA VENDING COFFIN GRONBERG DESCRIPTION27179<•>1993/04/291993/04/29 $393 69 $292.05 9995.91*COPY DUP PR INC COPY DUP PR INC27910<•>1993/04/29 $12 50 $12 50*DAVID MCNICHOLS27111<•>1993/04/26 $10 00 $10.00*DIXIE PETRO-CHEM27992<•>1993/04/29 $195 27 $195 27*EARL F ANDERSON ASSC27993<•>1993/04/29 $750 00 $750.00*ELM CREEK GOLF 27194 <•> 1993/04/29 $97.71 $97.71* FEED RITE CONTROLS 27995 <•> 1993/04/29 $141 10 $141.10* FIRST CMOir UNIFORMS 27999 <•> 1993/04/29 $296.9$ $296 66* FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL 27917 <•> 1993/04/29 $50 00 $50.00* GANGELHC^F, DONNA 27199 «• > 1993/04/26 1993/04/29 1993/04/29 1993/04/29 $25 06 $14.22 $153.39 -$•2 92 $110 04* GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO 27999 <•> 1993/04/29 19,156.60 $9,156 60* GEPHARDT ELECTRIC WATERWATERLIFT STATION FLASHERDUE TO PAYROLL Af.CTPOP ACCOUNTNUMBER INVOICE NO PONUMBER0129-4324 000479 0549-4359 0004790* ^-4344 000479 ^ 49-4324 0004799001-1050 000497 0590-4915 01001199597 MANUALSTAKE SALT STORAGE 0484-4309 1006 OHLEASE APRIL A HAINT 0129-42.*0 1703648 OHDEVELOPER BOOK 9001-1291 1709333 OHCONFERENCE0129-4359 000462 OHDEMURRAGE0549-4234 D00966245 OHSIGNS0249-4233 122753 OHSHARPEN BLADES 0590-4342 000470 OH CHLORINE 0549-4234 11193 OH UNIFORMS 0129-4221 1704 OH PARTS 0569-4232 1464 OH PICKUP DEER 0185-<’390 000471 OH SUPPLIES 0569-4232 000473 OH SUPPLIES 0099*4231 000473 OH SUPPLIES 0249-4232 000473 OH SUPPLIES 0249-4231 000473 OM ELECTRICAL ALL BLDGS 0410-4520 000508 OH h I m % iMiIiIil.liiI.McIiiWl'Ii•T# .1*•If.litiMi(t ITIII* iVf Ii •T* •riTiTiwir# P«9« 3ACCOUNTNUMBERINVOICE NO 04t3-4S20 000S09 PONUMBER0589-4306 3030515 0549-4306 303051501150129024905900174*151•U51415141514151 9022299022299022299022299022290039-4311 0004760590-4102 2305160493-4520 12693 0412-4520 129920549-4361 000472 0249-4361 000472 0129-4356 000504 0129-4341 000477 0549 0569 0069 0129 0174 0039 0039 4352 4352 4352 4352 4352 4352 4355 AN 0293 AR 0293 AR 0293 AR 0293 AR 0293 AR 0293 AR 0293 0590-4220 164512 )129-4341 000463 >001-1261 000500 >099-4242 71402 MANUALOHOHOHOHOHONOHOHOHOHOHOHOH f ;COUNCIL CHECK REQISTER WED. APR 21., 1993, 9:26 PMCHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTNUMBER INVOICE27904<•>1993/04/291993/04/291993/04/291993/04/29 9417.91 9146.90 914^.90 9542.02 91.253 73*MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE MAY INS MAY INS MAY INS MAY INS 0249-41510129-41510069-41510174-4151 106025910602591060259106025927909<•>1993/04/26 921,929.00 921.929.00*METRO WASTE MAY SEWER SERVICE 9673-1262 5148059327909<•>1993/04/291993/04/29 95.454.909559.7999.013.79*MIDWEST ASPHALT MIDWEST ASPHALT PAVING PARKING LOTS ASPHALT 0460-45110246-4233 0005072560EM27907<•>1993/04/291993/04/29 993.70-916.40947.30*MIDWEST BSNS PROD MIDWEST BSNS PROD SUPPLIESSUPPLIES 0249-42100030-4210 000461000461Ve1993/04/29 995.03 995.03-MINN UC FUND J ROSS UNEMP COMP 0590-4154 00050527909<•>1993/04/29 94,490.3294,460.32*MINNEQASCO UTILITIES 0099-4324 00046027910<•>1993/04/29 9202.359202.35*MN CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIA 2 MATTRESSES 0463-4520 0004909127911 <•> 1993/04/29 925.00 925.00* MN POLLUTION CONTROL AQEN BOOK 0174-4240 NSS005'* 27912 <•> 1993/04/29 97.059.90 97,059.90* MODERN BIN EQUIP CO LOCKERS-ALL BLDGS 0460-4520 000511 27913 <*> 1993/04/29 1993/04/29 9i,420.00 9917.00 92.107.00* MOLIN CONCRETE PRODUCTS MOLIN CONCRETE PRODUCTS PRECAST CONCRETE FINAL PRECAST CONCRETE FINAL 0464-4520 0460-4520 000506 000506 27914 <•> 1993/04/26 956 36 959.36* MOTOROLA INC REPAIR 0249-4342 2492096 27919 <•> 1993/04/29 913.50 913.50* MPLS OXYGEN CO DEMURRAGE 0129-4232 361462 27919 <•> 1993/04/29 925 69 925.19* MTI DIST CO PARTS 0290-4342 322239 27917 <•> 1993/04/29 1993/04/29 1993/04/29 9115.00 9230.00 9115.00 6490.00* NAAB/THERESA NAAB/THERESA NAAB/THERESA 4-5 MTQ 3/22 44/12 MTG 4/19 MTQ 0290-43090039-4306 0174-4306 000501 000501 000501 27911 1993/04/29 1993/04/29 1993/04/29 1993/04/29 9299.37 99.91 992.62 963.74 NAVARRE HARDWARE NAVARRE HARDWARE NAVARRE HARDWARE NAVARRE HARDWARE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 0249-4232 0249-4233 0249-4231 0099-4231 U00464 000464 000494 000464 P»9* *PONUMBER MAN>JAL 27918<•>1993/04/261993/04/261993/04/26 $17.94$33.1$$124.62$609.05*NAVARRE HARDWARE NAVARRE HARDWARE NAVARRE HARDWARE SUPPLIESSUPPLIESSUPPLIES27919<•>1993/04/261993/04/261993/04/26 $5.44$107.67$176.04$210.15*NSPNSPNSP UTILITIESUTILITIESUTILITIES27920<•>1993/04/26 $35.14135.14*OBRIEN,RANDY MILEAGE27921«•>1993/04/26 $44.24$44.24*OMAN/LYLE MILEAGE\27922<•>1993/04/26 $43.15$43.15*PAPER DEPOT CHIP BOARD!1 27123<•>1993/04/26 $94.15$94.15*PARK PRXUCTS INC SUPPLIES27S24<•>1993/04/26 $12.00912.00*PERM INS APRIL INS27929 <•> 1993/04/29 1993/04/26 $475.52 $54.03 $529 55* PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR REPAIR REPAIR 1 2732t <•> 1903/04/29 seo.oo $60.00* POST BOARD LICENSE F? [fe 1 ^'1? [ i 27927 1993/04/29 $4,506.49 $4,506.49* (PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 3/29-4/11 27t2l €•> 1993/04/26 653.76 $53 76* QUAST/WAYNE MILEAGE 1 : ■ r1|r 1 p' 2Tt2l <•> 1993/04/29 $213.20 $213 20* REE ' VENDING CANDY & CIGS 27030 <•> 1993/04/26 1993/04/26 1993/04/26 $2 12 $10.76 64.46117 34* RITZ CAMERA RITZ CAMERA :]ITZ CAMERA BATTERY FILM DEVELOP FILM DEVELOP 1 b-Ifem-[1* Ur 27031 <•> $5,640.00 $46.31 $5,666 31* ROLF E ERICKSON ROLF E ERICKSON MAY rEE SUPPLIES 27032 <•> 1993/04/26 1993/04/26 $17 92 630.00 647 92* SKREEN.DALE SKREEN.DALE MILEAGE license ACCOUNT..........^INVOICE NO0569-4232000484..........0004840129-4210 000484000485 2|JJ*A324 000485 0569-4324 0004850549-4381 0004860174-4381 0005020174-4210 28480174-4210 31910129-4152 000491000490 0129-4341 0004900129-4383 000488 •999-2031 000489 0549 4381 000492 0590-4802 10318 0129-4210 376417* JJIJ-J210 3764640 0129-4210 3764996 6059-4210 000469 P49* 5 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED. APR 21. 1993. 9:26 PM 9994 6numbermanualCHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTNUMBER INVOICE NO PONUMBER MANUAL27933<■>1993/04/26 9276.009276.00*SPAULDING GOLF BALLS 0590-4800 FT7141 OH27S<•>'93/04/26i993/04/26 9147.2998.529155.61*STA-SAFE LOCKSMITHS STA-SAFE LOCKSMITHS REPAIR LOCKS SUPPLIES 0099-434J0129-4210 13161261 OHOH27935<•>1993/04/261993/04/26 138.06930.00966.08*STEVE HANSEN STEVE HANSEN MILEAGELICENSE 0549-43810569-438J 000475000474 OHOH27936<•>1993/04/261993/04/261993/04/26 910.65971.25988.719170.61*STRETCHERSSTRETCHERSSTRETCHERS REPAIRREPAIR SIREN SUPPLIES 0129-4342UI29-43420129-421U 63966.164203.1 64299 1 OHOHOH27937<•>1993/04/26 9868.009868.00*STRQAR ROSCOE FAUSCH HWY 12 STUDY MARCH 0299-4306 0911561-13 OH27636<•>1993/04/26 937.22937.22*SUBURBAN TIRE INC REPAIR 0249-4232 000495 OH27939<•>1993/04/26 9885.009885.00*TECHNICAL SURFACING INC CONCRETE SEALER FINAL 0484-4520 000513 OH27940<*1993/04/26 1993/04/26 1993/04. ?6 91.026.5093.094.2593.094.25 97,215.00*TED MANNSTEDT L SON.INC TED MANNSTEDT & SON.INC TED MANNSTEDT 4 SON.INC STEEL FINAL STEEL FINAL STEEL FINAL 0464-45200483-45200480-4520 000512000512000512 OHOHOH 27941 <•> 1993/04/26 930.57 #30.57* THOMTON, MARK CLASS 0129-4356 000496 OH 27942 <•> 1993/0e/26 9227.00 6227.00* THORPE DIST CO BEER 0590-4615 1775 OH 279' <•> 1993/04/26 976 32 976.32* TOMCHECK, LARRY SUPPLIES 0129-4232 000497 OH 27944 <•> 1993/04/26 1993/04/26 1993/04/26 9511.00 91,664.00 1140.00 92.335.00* TWIN CITY OARAGE DOOR CO TWIN CITY OARAGE DOOR CO TWIN CITY OARAGE DOOR CO PW SERVICE DOORS FINAL PW OVRHEAD DOORS FINAL PW DOOR CONTROLS-FINAL 0484-4520 0484-4520 0484-4520 000514 000514 000514 OH OH OH 27945 <■> 1993/04/26 910 12 910 12* ULTIMATE AWARDS SUPPLIES 0129-4210 2751 OH 27949 <•> 1993/04/26 1993/04/26 1993/04/26 1993/04/26 976.90 943.95 96.00 91,171.50 91.298.35* UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM UNIFORM UNIFORM PATCHES 0129-4221 0129-4221 0129-4221 0129-4221 396295 398880 400555 103919 OH ON OH OH 27947 1993/04/26 955 34 US WEST C08WUN WTR TWR UTILITIES 0549-4324 000503 OH beephaven Excelsior Greenwood Long Lake Medina Minnetonka Beach Minnetrista LAKE MtNNETONKA CABLE COMMUNiCATiONS COMMiSSiON 540 S<>rond Slrr«l • P.O. Boa 473 • Eac^liior. Minnesota 55331-0473 (612) 474-5539 • Faa (612) 474-0430 OronoSt. Bonifacius Skorewood Spring Park Tonka Bay Victoria ' Woodland APR 2 2 1983 Api20, 1993 Mayor Edward Callahan City council Members City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway, Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mayor Callahan and Council Members: A long and dedicated effort by the Cable Commission and the four­ teen cities in our franchised area, has taken a major step in restoring some regulatory control over cable television service and rates. Effective immediately, Triax cablevision is required to answer a telephone call within thirty seconds, respond to a service problem inside of 24 hours, and schedule that "trouble cal)" in a four hour (maximum) block of time. These are three positive moves by the FCC and attributable to our effort that helped pass the legislation in Congress last October 1992. I'm also fully aware that Jim Daniels, our Administrator, has kept the cities very well informed on the whole process, as it moved through congress and into the hands of the FCC. At this tine, however, there has been some confusion over the ac­ tual status of the rules and what your rosidents may have interpreted by reading the newspaper or watching local network television stations. Page Two The Star Tribune, for example, indicated that "basic" cable rates would innediately be lowered by ten percent. Since that article, the Cable Commission office has received numerous telephone calls asking how much the cable customer should deduct from their \pril 1993 cable bill* The fact is, that at this time they can actually subtract nothing! In ad­ dition to that, when the regulation is implemented, I think that the cable subscriber will probably see a credit to their monthly bill, rather than having them deduct some dollar amount from their payment. The Cable Commission's attorney has infoznoed us that, even though this is a very positive and substantial action by the FCC, the amount and effective date of "basic" cable rate reduction, is yet to be deter­ mined. This could even be influenced by a lawsuit that's bcxng dis­ cussed in the cable industry, against the FCC's interpretation of the action by Congress. In the meantime, however, the FCC has frozen cable rates for a 120 day period that went into effect on April 5, 1993. The Cable Commission has some significant decisions to make, once the information contained in the FCC's Report and order has been offi­ cially published and studied by both our staff and legal counsel. As always, we will keep you abreast of any changes or final action that the Cable Commission may take, regarding the new FCC rules on sub­ scriber services and monthly rate charges I believe that we must look ■t this as a significant success, but continue to keep the results in perspective with their date of enforcement. Page Three If you have any questions regarding this information or simply want a more frequent update on the current status, you can always call Jim Daniels at the Cable Commission office (474-5539). Sincerely, LAKE HltmETOEKA CABLE C mjCArioEs cotmiscioE Barbara J. Brancel Chairperson BJB/cl cc: Cable Commissioners City Administrators/City Managers To: From: Date: Mayor Callafian and Orono Couricilnicmbers I Ron Moorse, City Administrator j// \ U April 23. 1993 Subject: l.uncheon Meeting with Governor Carlson Governor Carlson is planning to be in this area on Monday, April 26. A luncheon meeting has been scheduled to provide an opportunity for representatives of the cities in the area to meet with the Governor. The luncheon meeting will be held at 11:30 a.m. at the Burl Oaks Gt)lf Club in Minnetrista. Burl Oaks is located on North Arm Drive, just east of County Road 110. A map showing the location of the golf course is attached. It may work best to meet at City Hall at 11:(X) a.m., then car pool to ?«»: meeting. If you have any questions about the meeting, please call me. I I lUr'12' ’I •I,'*S V ti /* ;., I, J , ? I . ( j,'. .1- • ’*1' ^ ' r ■ X uidopenclonce l’-* w '• ‘ II 1 Ct>*t HoM < I• ■ * X V; !V..' •'• 14 t t II •.nko tndciiriKlCHCO ; . L«Ve { h.A'* (Moll Moon. . •'••NJn'.'v llpKc.Medina 4|, I ■( , 0«imCiLSJ1 !': .i’lV:^ .1 •» Lioltit i' ,1^ ( i (J s «"■' ••; ,4 •' @ OiU» I k II # ' •T (iOl.K COURSE 'rr ••••I'''Minnetri:>tai /26 I » I ■<"'h t niy Nnmc '1)'', • ■ * kVtIh Affr |>iltf f-*:— Iwnntti«i4 ^lart i!3 s:i.. M U . Wolnfold • ohc I OM^l I .ikf* ^ ‘ y Lycllnnl ; aoo'i •Tkr v ^ r ? Orono 1 . MOO'IOjf Mlmdfhi (N l;iK .i tifrh I i f ----------1 k- • ,{]'"v •»' ’ n'' O • iWl ,, jr \ "I \ Hn»r •f^ii-v ....M .. />* •• no I '. Dtml(iif:i*tiii 1 ! .V'’ H ^ * *>l * ra___**—*-^ Opting I i»i ii!< n,*n ^t "' i>*'' Qrwmodo'A'k ^ [i?D ^OM V'''* );;} $;s^< M r#.PFR 22 *93 11:^^!M!ia5*. t » * [«m • • •. Ji--SR?m#1 April 22, 1993 City of Orono P.O. Box 66 CrystiU Bay, TvfN 55323 Attn: Mayor Callahan Orono City Council Planning Cc'^unission City Staff Dea: Mayor Callahan and City Council Members: I would like to take this opportunity to thank each of you for allowing me to serve on the Orono Planning Commission ar.d also to respectfully decune reappointment for another term. I have enjoyed the time I've volunteered over the past six Commission* getting to know and work with City Staff, Council,^ Commission’mernbers, meeting and serving fellow the planning ftar..ework for the City of Orono. However, feel that someone else be given the opportunity to serve on the Planning and to provide a new perspective and fresh ins.gi. s. ! r ■■H 4 / Tuesday LAKE MINMETOMKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 900 E. VJayzata Blvd, Suite 160, Wayzata, 473-7033 AMENDED APRIL 1993 MEETING SCHEDULE 6 LATE Siting Subcommittee 6:30 pm, LMCD Office LATF Steering Subcommittee 8:00 pm, LMCD Office Thursday Saturday Tuesday Wednesday Friday Saturday Monday Tuesday Friday Wednesday 8 13 17 Administrative Committee 4:00 pm, LMCD Office Public Hearing/Gideon's Point HOA 7:30 am, 135 Norwest Bank Bldg. Water Structures Committee 8:00 am, 135 Norwest Bank Bldg. Environment Committee 8:00 am, LMCD Office Fee Study Subcommittee 4:30 pm, LMCD Office LATF Siting Subcommittee 7:00 pm, 135 Norwest Bank Bldg. Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force 8:30 am, 135 Norwest Bank Bldg. Lakewatch Program 10:00 am. Tonka Bay Marina Club House Lake Use & Recreation Comm. 4:30 pm, 135 Norwest Bank Bldg. Technical Review Committee 8:00 am, 135 Norwest Bank Bldg. Boating Study-Summary of Findings* 8:00 am, LMCD Office Administrative Coimiiittee Meeting* 5:30 pm Tonka Bay City Hall Public Hearing for Paradise Lady Charter Boat - Wine i Beer License 7:00 pm Tonka Bay City Hall LMCD Board of Directors Regular Meeting, 7:30 pm Tonka Bay City Hall a 4/20/93 ‘added to schedule w * APR 2 2 'IS® TO: FROM; DATE: Mayor aiul Citv Council Ron Moorsc, City Administrator April 22. 1993 SUBJECT: Sewer Plant Property Subdivision Update As part of the new citv facilities budget process the cost of the land for the facilities site was partially offset by the sale of two city owned properties. One was the Crystal Bay City Hall site, the other was the former sewer plant property off Old Crystal Bay Road. The projected revenue from tlic sale of these properties was $35,tXX) and $150,000 respectively. The following is an update regarding tlie potential sale of the sewer plant property. The Park Commission has rccoimnended that the property containing the former sewer pond and the open area north of the MWCC lift station (a total of approximately 30 acres) be retained for park use; and that the 6 acres to the southeast of the lift station (the oak knoll area) be subdivided for residential development. Th ' Planning Commission has recommended that the entire sewer plant property be retained by the city for open spaee/park use. The City Couiicil has directed staff to proceed to investigate subdividing the property to creme two residential lots in the southeast portion of the property. Staff has analyzed the southeast portion of the property lo determine how best to subdi' ide it in order to minimize the city ’s investment in improvements, maximize revenue generated, and minimize the impact of the residential development. This analysis has indicated the optimum alternative is to create one residential lot using the total six acre parcel. ITiis would provide revenue n excess of the $150,000 originally projected from the sale of the entire sewer plant property, while not requiring any improvements by the city. Staff has arranged lo have the site tested lo determine whethci there is adequate on-site septic capacity. ch ii "-■'i To: From: Date: Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator April 22. 1993 Subject: Human Rights Complaints Received by the City In the past two months, the City has been informed that two separate complaints have been filed with the State Department of Human Rights alleging discriminatory treaunent by police officers of the City. Both of the complaints have been investigated by the Chief of Police. He has found no evidence to support the allegations. Staff lias comprehensively responded to each complaint and has denied the allegations in each case. The Department of Human Rights will now review the complaints and the City’s responses to determine whether the evidence supports the allegations. This review process normally takes approximately one year to complete. A brief summary of each complaint is as follows: 1. A person with a hearing disability who was arrested for a DWI alleged he was discriminated against because of his disability. 2.A person of color whose car was towed because of a revoked driver ’s license alleged she wa discriminated against because of her race. If any councilmember would like additional information regarding the cmnplaints. I would be glad to meet to provide that information. To: From: Date: Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator April 22, 1993 Subject: Pay Equity Compliance Update The City recently received notification from the Department of Employee Relations (DOER) that the City is not in compliance with the Pay Equity Law requirements based on the report submitted by the City in January of 1992. This report reflected salary information as of December 31, 1991. At that time the City had not completed the process of modifying its pay structure to comply with the pay equity requirements Since then the City has completed this process, however, this information could not be included in the report submitted in January of 1992. Staff has contacted DOER to indicate the salary structure has been modified since the initial report was submitted. DOER has indicated if the City submits an updated report by August 1993 that complies with the pay equity requirements, the City will have met its responsibility under the Pay Equity Law. DOER suggested the City run the updated salary information through the Department ’s Pay Equity Compliance Software to determine whether the changes do, in fact, bring the City into compliance. Staff has done so, and has determined that the current pay structure does comply with the pay equity requirements. FPOli GR mv Flmn T t MuOTv 2 (TuE)04.:o.’i>3 1413 0 I P M ^ £ 2 GRAY, PLANT, MOOTV, MOOl'V bENNETT, P A. INCLUDING THE FORMER FIRM OF R\R5TAD & >'X' na RO wOC CAS? MtMlH W WAVlRSTOC** W4 rAANHUM 0 •frtA ’••Cl r«Afi»R «r. jR 40».« % noon littv'N H •• itSNC^ CL*NT>AI A •C**R^tC‘C" C #iA'*«C MAR9*^AP te«Al'0 / CAUAMAN. jn AAMKt A •iC mA«« H fkiMT MAC«At a M^OC •m/ct 9c gnvtnwtiMou AHU t •AVI# T. •KtMtcrr co«M« e cahrc «i*|a • ••AAtOA W tH#fL ALMVT AHO^Cwt jR MOCk P. MWWUP tOy«W^ it HAIMSOW H6*C«T W AfklANO rAAMAvtMC iCftt 4^ ••UCC 1 AJ««iAT OAMtW A tMUkMAN MiCNACL H <gN«iN«RAM HO«UfT # WAA#0*» T«^AS L. /OMNiON •*<RkRC A mCORC vw ’Ck'AM u. 4'LL‘0*< CW'lAtCTW W. NORTON JUOITA4 BCVli LAAOCV'N 40MN r■•owcR tHOMAA fiAR».>*«9 ^0**N M N vOHOLS MAirr OCTM fROO tAfliARA • MAUfCR AWAN ▼. HCLO OAvto M MOon fiiCMAAO A HACHtrr H»CHARD i MOLLOA'AV WiWUAM O RkCiN tUfAM W tCCAL NiCHOLAt N NifRCNOARTfN ^uM V a RC n N ■▼crncn li iiec /QHN O 0iu0<cc&* 4R RATMLtC*< i- RtLkOTlON MART R martin MiCMACk C FlOn PAVid e R am ;^ PHILUR RO^L 4AMI& r CARRCU. ROtCRtf HAROINR iAyR* J HCIN 3400 CITY CENTER THIRl Y EHREE south SIXTH STTXiTt MINNE^POUS, MIN'NESOTA 55402.37« TEl£?KDNE «12 • 343 • 1800 R*uX6i:-333-e06< ■r*’X9tC-57«-277J DIRECT DIAL 343-2834 April 19, 1993 w r«**o fH.K T MwvlSON r.C mau D C ••••i'AN »(NNT n NANCtg;,Ar^k.f iAuv §.A»e W*i UAM J AifMCR VtRC'N'A t »C«-UCRT OCOOCC R AOOO C avl CN i- ANAC* jtrftHf C ANCtRSON Tamara mjIUl ^irrRtY 0 fiCA NANCt ROfThan mC n 2CL OUC n TiN R ttiTTROC a ROWRT A MARCAVY Of AN A. UOOUR rRCCOW r mCRZ §«iAN R RCMNCWA wa OC T ANOCi>rfON LAURA J RCMOC*^t*v>tR RiCR f RURwiR •aroara I TRC^hCA/AV A Pa OCR COwANO A CARVC** ma R a R. TmomARON MARK • MUtMOLLAM NANC* J MILkCR wf AOOA^* SjfAA orrwr* t€sC2€y'f«« CMARUOtTC A A Mf all LI R k CNO UU c SA • RAJCR M'LkiAM R AfCR jC nn 0 •►'.wuman tcTiR t M WALCC^ OONfTANCf J PAlfMCNT OL'VIA W WAlLtNO TimOTmy a RCAtTRC«« • AT»;CA R TCWNkf T jOna T»*an m RCOCRAvf jf NNirtR RCCOfTROM C»?ARLtt R MAICR OAV«0 A ORlNfMAW COcNSCk O -AMf• nicv RC n 0AN>Ck • vfN-Rli 4«- •CRCRT A fTC-N 0ANI9 M COVNC Ms. DottlR Rietow, Chair MRtropollt.an Council Nears Park Centre 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101-1634 Dear Ms. Rietovrt Lest week I had occasion to attend the meeting of Metro Council, Booting as a whole. I «» the Mayor ?f 0'°"2 A matter before you involving Orono and Long Lake. The matter woo rMOlwd to the satisfaction of the two cities with the very helpful work on your staff, whom we wish to thank. While we were waiting to be heard, however, I listened with considerable interest to the application of the City of Andover. Much of the discussion by the Council mem^rs seemed to Involve transportation issues involving Highway 10 and an •Interim plan" Metro Council Is apparently working on. It occurred to me that regardless of any plans which your organisation may be considering, MnDot is at present engaged in an Environmental Impact Study with the purpose of extending Highway 12 from waysata westward through either a new section of OrSno or through L^ng Lake, where it now is, to ^^^2.?2?e beyond. Orono, of course, is opposed to certain of the^ssiblo routes. But from the point of view is self evident that the route eventually selected by MNDot will in fact determine both your transportation plan and your interim development plans in a westerly direction. The selection of the wrong corridor will have the effect of commercialising a rural area, harming a current commercial area, and drastically changing residential zoning In the direction of FROM GRtJV PLOrU & nOOTV iTUE >04.20. •93 J 413 I NO . t 9 PQjE 3 M«. Dottie Rietow, Chair Metropolitan Council Page 2 April 19, 1993 1/4 acre lots from the current 2-5 acre density, with man'/ collateral effects produced by these changes. So 1 am writing to suggest that you may wish S?Sdlid ' and''??ovide%ha?“er *h2“TOt^t''o~nor*it* HtafI,"Sr »"?be%leasod to talk to you or your staff about the mat-er. Very truly yours, Edward J. Callahan, Jr» Mayor of Orono BJC/ch 2132Y R «, — 1 *51 — •=> 3; r-1 a 3 5 *4 R E R' K* ' •'*h' . ^1 Officers Meeting March 18th. 1993 Attendance: Brown, Loomis,Madden, Perry, Becker, Cox Guests: Mayor Tod Olsen, Jim Hartflel, Phil Zietlow Trucks: New chassis might cost up to $35,000, Used 10-$15,000. Looking at 85" to 89 It's harder to find a used chasses, however Rick Is looking for a 6 speed manual or auto. Recieved OK from Mayor to go forward with finding and buying chasses for truck. Rick will present his Information to council. Repair: Generator E-II, Brown talked to General and we won"t pay even H of the lobor bill. General will get in touch with Kohler and get back to Mike. Phone: To fix ?it • will get our own # and split the cost with Karv. The l‘s to the cellulars will be in the rescue truck. Tod Olsen will see if he can supply us with phones. Physicals are costing $415.00 for members over 40 yrs. and are $396.00 for members under that age. Memborship: Gorney will be starting FFI In April (7th). Cloud and Reeds classes were full at State Fire School, They and a few others are signing up for the classes at Wayzata. Eli and men will go, please ask an officer for more Info. You need to be a class 3 driver. Hovercraft will be fixed by the 26th of March and cost to department Is $1004.00 Events: Chamber needs firefighters around for the day and night of June 26th. He wouUlike to start a coninittee on the April I2th business meeting.. The Health 11 Fair still needs volunteers. This starts at 0730 til 1930 on April ?6th. M2ple Plain will be there lets show up tool Set up is on Sunday night for about 15 minutes. Ik Long Lake Volunteer Fire Dept Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 ^.03 activities in your city’s fire coverage area; I^OIAL CALLS FOR MARCH 1993: 15 year to DATE: 36 Call breakdown per area; Long Lake YEAR TO DATE; Long Lake 5. Orono - 8, Medina - 2 12, Orono - 14, Medina - 3 total man hours for march 1993;J97 year to DATE: 634 VEAR TO DATE: Long Lake . 199. 0ro„o . 406. Healna - 30 Th.Jonow,„9 list breaks <■. - the fire depart^.t can, p, fire MEDICAL long lake orono MEDINA TOTAL MAR.YTO MAR.YTD 2 6 2 10 3 5 1 1 0 0 0 1 5 11 3 12 .1. A CCIDENT ALARM MAR.YTD MAR.YTO 0 1 1 2 1 2 2 5 0 0 2 2 1 3 7 9 pnPHAM HAIK MEMORANDUM 3300 Piper Jaffray Tower 222 South Ninth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402(612) 333-4800 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Orono City Council Members Kevin P. Staunton^y,*/ March 25, 1993 willow property Ssl-? of Land to City of Orono The litigation involvina the land occupied by the Orono City Hall h« finely Some to a lonclusion. Aa you may remember, a auiat title action was filed sornetirae ago by the seller in deJlsion h» now run. Therefore, this challenge to the City s ownership of the property has been extinguished. YOU may also recall that, ‘Jj® «s’JSo\resc?oS to.. «>hA sAllsr aoteed to Set aside »75,ooo in escrow tu KA^iiMfi^hv the citv in anticipation of this particular claim. Since the^claim which that escrow account anticipated is now at an end, the Council is required under the escrow agreement to release the amount held in escrow to the seller. In releasing this escrow amount, you aie not releasing any of i-hn i?har o”tS?tions or warranties as to title to the property which you obtained in the original purchase. I have arknowledaroent of non-waiver that Brad Fuller of our office sent seller’s attorney to confirm that we have not waived any of JSe iSdJSiity Snd w«?Slities included in the original Closing Agreement. In addition, the Warranty Deed from the seller which contains the warranties of title remains in full force an effect. Finally, the City is protected by title insurance shou any party claim an interest in the property. Pursuant to your March 22, 1993 resolution, we the escrow funds to the seller when they have executed and delivered the acknowledgment of non-waiver. cc: Ron Moorse TJBarrett BAFuller 27WPS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF NON-WAIVER The undersigned/ Willow Properties, a Minnesota general partnership ("Willow"), hereby acknowledges to the City of Orono ("City") the following: 1. Willow and City are parties to that certain Closing Agreement dated September 26, 1991 whereby Willow, pursuant to paragraph 2 thereof, agreed to indemnify and hold City harmless from and against any loss or liability that may be incurred as the result of Optionees’ interest in the Property, as such terms are defined in said Closing Agreement. 2. In consideration of the City’s releasing the ■Withheld Proceeds" to Willow pursuant to paragraph 2 of said Closing Agreement, Willow acknowledges that the release to Willow of said Withheld Proceeds shall not constitute a waiver release fay the City of any rights or remedies that the City lucy have under the Closing Agreement. 3. Nothing contained herein shall affect any other provision of said Closing Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect. 4. Willow acknowledges that City will be relying upon the provisions hereof in order to release the Withheld Proceeds. This Acknowledgement is executed as of this March, 1993. day of WILLOW PROPERTIES, a Minnesota general partners', ip Wilfred D. Gagne, Partner iaS8:BAF ews etween Association of Metropolitan Municipalities April 1993 Awards, election highlight evening Annual Meeting May 26 in Minnetonka Mark your calendars for May 26, the evening tcheduled for Ihe AMM Annual Meeting. The Minnetonka Community Center U the site of the Annual Meeting, which begins with a reception/^al hour at 5:30 pan., vrith dinner and the business meeting to follow. Activities include election of officers aiui board members and the presenting of fi>e AMM Innovative Qty and Peacemaker awards. Before the reception, tours of Minnetonka's police and }ail fadii- lies %vill be conducted, beginning at 4:30 p m. Hie three-year-old facility, constructed as part of an overall oommurdty Qvic Center project, was a $3.1 million project funded uritiiout a tax inoease by interest earned on investments by the dty. The police building occupies about 23,000 square feet, and the dty hall, fire station walkways and firearm range are in the remain ­ ing 7,922. The detention fadlity has six individual cell uiuts and one mul­ tiple cell unit. To help reduce a detainee's anxiety, the department selected colors for their subliminal eifect. Also, the facility has a 24- hour, 7-day-a-%veek language line available for interpretation and a day room for recreation purposes. People wanting to tour the fadlity may make arrangements with Carol Williams at the AMM ^fice, 49O-3301. AMM awards competition under way Nominations are being accepted for dte AMM's second annual Innovative Oty Award, which will be presented during the AMM Annual Meeting May 26. Also, the AMM will present its first Peacerroker Award to the dty that has reserved a difficult or urUque situation by meaits other than die court system. The Innovative City Award recognizes die dty duit has undertaken an activity or program that, among other things, stimulates creativity, demonstrates efficiency, promotes economic viability, develops an awareness among reddents and fosters a sense of coiiununity. Last year, Richfield's Adaptive Recreation Program and Minneapolis' CA Jt.E. program were co-wirmers. Odes truly enter as many activities and/or projects as they %vish. However, each entry must be submit^ separately. Judging %vill be conducted by a five-member pand of elected ai^ appointed dty offidals. in initiating its Peacemaker Award, die AMM board possibilities of alternative dispute resolution methods and whether they suit a dty’s nee^. The application deadline for both awards is April 23. People wanting more information about cither die Iruiovative Qty Award or the Peacemaker Award may call Nicole Debevec St the AMM office, 490-3301. Office, board nominations sought The Association of Metropolitan Munidpalities is seeking nominations for officers and merrhen of die board of directors. Members of the Nominating Committee are Bob Long, Chair, AMM Past President, St. Paul COundl; Tom Egan, Eagan Mayor; Kevin Frazell, Cottage Grove Administra ­ tor; J. Diann Goetten, Orono COundl; Nancy Jorgensoa Fridley Council, and Jim Prosser, Richfiel'1 Manager. Oty officials who would like to be considered for nomination should forward their names and brief resumes wanted to recognize a city's efforts to resolve a dispute by to the AMM Office, attention Vem Peterson no lata dian alternative methods, not the court system. This award was April 14. developed from a recommendation made by the AMM's Dispute Resolution Committee, chaired by New Brighton Coundl member Roger Williams, director of the sUte The AMM board is responsible for the overall manage ­ ment and administration of the AMM staff and activities. The board normally meets monthly on the first Thursday Office of Dispute Resolution. The committee believed that at 7 p.m honoring a city for resolving a dispute by non-tradibonal means could eiKOurage other communities to explore the People may call Vem Peterson in the AMM office, 490- 3301, for more information about board duties. 4MDIFpublic hearing planned for April 14 Qty officials have the opportunity to comment on proposed changes to the the Metropolitan Council's Metropolitan Envelopment and Investment Framework (MDIF) dufirtg a public hearing April 14 from 4 to 6 p.m. in the Metropolitan Council Ch^bers in St. Paul. In Options pr Change, the Council suggested two possible alternatives regardiitg the role govern ment may play in guidirtg growth in the regfoa ^e option would respond to market trends while the other would challenge market trends when the Council bdieves challenge is necessary. Both options seek a stronger role for govenunent than is embodM in the current MDIF. During work sessions and in presentations to the AMM's Metropolitan Agencies Cbmmittee, Council staff indicated that the Council probably would seek a bleiui of the two optkms. The AMM Metropolitan Agencies CcmmUttee met several times with representative? from the Metrop<^>litan Council. Because of the hectic legislative schedule, how* ever, the oonunittee has been uiuible to develop a position statement regarding the direction the Council has taken regarding the MDIF. Qty officials should feel free to offer ootrunents on the MDIF themselves, rather than wait for a oonuTient from the Metropolitan Agertdes Committee, or assume that because the Metropolitan Agencies Commit ­ tee has not conunented on the MDQF revision, the process arid alternatives fall within AMM policy. People wanting more iifformation may call Donna Mattson at the Courdl, 291-0904. 'Recycle Roundtable' planned for June at Mall of America Local govenunent officials will have a chance to meet face-to-face with vendors of products with recycled content and recycling services during a halfway informa ­ tion exchange June 14. “Buy ReqMed Roundtable" wiU run from 8 a.m. to noon in the Minnesota Room of the Mall of America in riooirtington. From 8 to 10 a.n\. local government officials may meet %vith about 20 vendors who offer recycled prcduct« or recycling services for such things as oil, solveitt, tires, paper and carpet, as well as the traditional materials. From 10 a.m. to rwon two concurrent panels %rill be conducted: "Chlorofluorocarbons - CFCs" and "Life Cycle Analysis in Purchasing.'' The event is open to local officials at no cost, courtesy of a grant from the Metropolitan Council awarded to DPRA Inc. of St. Paul. Pre-registration is required. Registration will be on a first call, first served basis. People wanting more infonrtation about the roundtable or to register may call Katy Boone. DPRA Inc., 227-6500. Option would clarify Metro HRA, Met Council duties The Metropolitan HRA Advisory Conurtittee has adopted a modified MetropoUtan CouncU HRA, which would, among other things, call for a clearer division of duties regarding Metro FRA business, and would expand the Metro HRA Advisory Committee membership. The AMM Housing and Economic Development Com ­ mittee, and the AMM Board of Directors adopted lan ­ guage that recommertded the AMM take i» position about this because it was viewed as a nutter between the Metro HRA and the Metropolitar. Council. The Metro HRA staff believed the modified Metropolitan Coundl FiRA alternative would strengthen the Council's focus on its role as an FiRA authority, improve account ­ ability to users by broadening FiRA Advisory GonurUttee membership., and improve effectiveness by reducing operating costs and using Section 8 opening reserves to fund additiorul housing programs arul activities. Reganling the operation and thrust of the Metro FiRA and the Metropolitan Council, the AMM Housing arul Economic Development Cbmmittee and the AMM Board voted to support the foIIo%ving actions: 1. The Metropolitan Council should carefully consider whether a portion of Metro FiRA reserve funds should be used to support area-wide housing prograiru. The AMM committee was coiKemed about high durges incurred the Metro FiRA for Council-provided services. 2. The Metropolitan Council should assume a greater coirunitn^t to resolving metro area housing ittiiri 3. The Met Courtdl and the Metro FiRA Advisory Committee should seek consistency of rules between and among housing agencies, arul work to devdop a better relatioiuhip arul spirit of cooperation among the Metro ­ politan Coimdl, the Metro FiRA Advisory Committee arul local authorities, and among local authorities themselves. 4. The AMM would like to work with the Metropolitan Council to assure that the Metro FiRA frmctiotw most effectively. The AMM would like to participate In the ' development of proposals for any division of autfrority between the MefropoUtan Council and the Metro FiRA Advisory Committee, and any proposed changes in the Metro FiRA Advisory Committee make-up. Fee survey responses due April 14 The AMM's bieruUal Municipal License arul Permit Survey is under way. The survey of municipal lists zees, by category, for alcoholic beverages, amuserrif nt artd coctunerdal recreation, building-construction/utilities, business and iruscellaneous, planning and sorting park aiu! recreation user fees and police fees. People with questiorts about the survey may call Carol Williams at the AMM office. 490-3301. Legislative update...An update on bills of interest to AMM members; action through April 6 . Urban planning An onerous urban plaiming bill (SF449, Marty) appears dead for this session. The bill would have directed the Metropolitan Council to ^ , .. ., , adopt long-range policy to protect agricultural land as part facilities in agricultural preserves arei of tte Couitcil Metropolitan Development Guide and outeide of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA), _—1.,^ .11—. j-.------------... . ^ considered part of the Orfield package. The more onerous provision tfuit ivould have lequiied all agricultural land to be eligible for ag preserves status at ... Ag preserves HF622 (Oifield) and SF695 (Marty) contain provisions dealing %vith public facilities in agricultural p • • -- mandated that all guide chapters supersede local compre­ hensive plans. Ihe AMM vigorously opposed the bill as presented initially. It was amended to include only a provision that %vould revise state law to clarify the relationship between local comprehensive plarts arui zoning. The bill as amended meets AMM policy. ... Trunked emergency dispatch A bill that was the result of a task force on the feasibility of an 80(Vmegahertz trurtked radio ^stem for the metro- pcditan area has been introduced. HF9M (Kelley), SF1062 (Mondale) would set up coordi­ nation and consolidation of public mobile radio communi­ cations system in the metro area aivi oeate a metropolitan telecommurdcations board arui advisory committee. The AMM Board of Directors recently adopted a resolu­ tion supporting the concept of further study to determine the advisibility of a trunked radio ^stem for the area. The Serute version was amended arui passed from the Metro­ politan aiul Local Government CorruiUttee to Governmen­ tal Operations. The bill is consistent with AMM policy. ... TIP proposals A number of Tax Increment Finarwing (TIF) proposals have been introduced. AMM policy supports some arui opposes others. One proposal, SF820 (Pappas), would provide TTF manufacturing districts and exempt them from the LCA/ HACA penalties. AiH>ther proposal moving through the Senate, SF12i9 (Berglin), would exempt housing districts from the LGA/HACA penalty. The B^lin bill has been passed out of the Senate Metropolitan and Local Govern­ ment Committee aitd re-referred to Taxes, where the Pappas bill is also. The likeliest vehicle for TIF in the House is HF1189 (Rest), which the AMM opposes because of Its restrictions. It would irrodify TIF provisions to cover contandnation in soil conditions districts aiul allow use of TIF in hazardous waste subdistricts to cover environmental insurance or guaranty fund payments. It also would authorize and set terms for manufacturing districts and authorize assess ­ ment agreement modifications or temriiation on mutual consent There are provisions for three specific cities in this bill that the AMM does not oppose. the landotvner's initiation has been removed from HF622. Also rentoved from the House version was a section that would have prohibited construction of storm tewen or roads in or near ag preserves land. The bill still contains language that would disallow assessment for storm water or road projects in ag pre­ serves land. It does, however, remove diese restrictions for ag preserves estabUshed after Dec. 1,1993, which becomes surrounded <m at least 75 percent of its perimeter by tfie urban service area. HF622 is on the floor in the House. SF695 has been scheduled for a hearing in the Senate Metropolitan and Local Government Committee at 2 psn. April 14. ... Housing choice The comprehensive housing dtoice bill (HF471, OrL_ and SF529, Novak) originally would have directed the Metropolitan Council to allocate comprehensive housii^ choice allotment numbers throughout die metropoUtan area and would have set penalties for nor»<ompliance. The bill has been amended so that penalties rdateonly to removal of barriers and not to numbers. Under provisiems of the airteitdcd version, the Metro­ politan Council would analyze each city's local practice s to determiiw whether barriers exist to providing coo^rclKn- sive choice housing. Penalties relating only to the removal of barriers arui not numbers remain in the bilL The House version was on the floor and die Serute version was in Serute Taxes Conunittee. ... Water supply A water supply bill (HF704, Trimble; SF697, Price) has been anund^ so that it is coiuistent with AMM policy. The bill as origirully presented would have nu^ water supply a nwtro^itan system. It also would prohibit the use of grourvi water for surface water level rruinterunce arui would require criteria for water supply emeigenUcs. Both the House and Serute versions of the bill are on Secoiul Reading in their respective chandieis. Legislative update,,, ... Metro governance reorganization A metropolitan governance reorganization bill (HF1090, Pugh) passed out of the House Local Government and Metropolitan Affairs Committee on April 2. It contains an elected Metropolitan Council provision that essentially was taken from the AMM developed bUl, HF959/SF843. HF1090 eliminates the Regional Transit Board (RTB) and the MetropoUtan Transit Cbmmission (MTC) and the dtizen boards associates with those agencies. In place of the RTB, the bill would create a itew Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) headed by a chief admiiUstrator ap­ pointed iy the Metropolitan Cdundl Chair. The MTA has roughly tfie same respoitsibilities as the diminated RTB, minus the citizen boa^. The MTC would be replaced bj' an entity called Metro Transit (MT). Metro Transit essentially is the bus company and would be run by a chief administrator appointed by the Metropolitan Council chair. On the Senate side, the governance reorganization bill that is moving b SF1U7 (Hynn). This bill would keep the Metropolitan Cbundl as an appointed body. It also would dimirule the RTB aruJ MTC and would repbee them with an MTA and MT |ust as HF1090. Sni27 abo contains a provisio n that would esublish a sbte advisory council on metropolitan govenumce which would provide advice to the Legblature on the present and future role of the Metropolitan Council, metropolitan agencies and local govenuirental unib as defined in Minnesota Statutes 473.121. TTiis advisory council would sunset orre year after the effective date of tht bill, which b the day foUowine firuJ eructment ^ Another bill affecting the Metropolitan Cbundl, HF1376 (Ctmithen), SF1081 (PogemUler)^ would redraw the boundaries of the Metro^tan Council dbtricb and redefine Council tenrts under the redbtricting plan. It would rebin gubernatorial appointiirent process to the Council. The Senate Ethics Or.nmittee has passed out the bill and it b on the floor. The AMM b monitoring the bUI and has no position on it except to mainbin the integrity of dty boundaries to the greatest degree possible. .... Urban enterprise zones Rep. Myron Orfield's bill that would create urban CTterprbe zones (HF677; SF479, Mondale) b likely to be folded into the House Omnibus Tax bill. Orfield's bill would require the MetropoUtan Cbundl to set criterb for tiwurfaan enterprise zone program and would exempt from taxation improvemenb made to C/1 property during the term of the enterprise zone. Orfield's bill also would eliminate economic develop ­ ment TIF districb in the metropolitan area. The AMM opposes thb biU since it restricts TIF usage in the metropolitan area as compared to oubbtc Minne^b and restricte usage only to certain dties in the metropoli- Un area. ... Transit/transportation The transporfa ion elemente of Rep. Myron Orfield's Metropolitan Community SbbUity Act are in HF623 (Orfield), SF474 (Pappas). ThebiU has been changed significantiy to remove the ^viroiunenbl Impact Sbtement sodal comment section, ^so deleted was a prohibitive dause dealing with capac­ ity improvemenb that nuiy have stopped metropoUbn highway development Portiais retained in the bUI indude a requirement for goab and objectives updates for the sbte and metropoUtan tiansporbtion plaits, and a directive to consider whether transit alternatives could better meet a capadty improve ­ ment within individual projeeb. The bill also indudes language that would direct that the federal Intermodal Surface Transporbtion Effidency Act transit priority funds must be used for traiuit unless a trunk highway project b ancillary to a transit fadUty project. Added to the bill was language that would allow a transporbtion projed to be built or completed provided at least 50 percent of the commuiUties served by the projed are in compUanoe %vith comprehensive durice housing projeeb. Those dties not in compliance would be refused access to the hi^way. The bill is on the floor in the House but b currently tied up in the Senate Transporbtion Committee, where it lu » had one hearing aiul was laid over. Board opposes use of FD funds for social, physical needs The AMM Board of Directors at ib April 1 meeting adopted language that opposes using fiscal disparitia money to fund so^ or physical mebopoUbn programs. In taking the action to oppose thb type of us#* of fiscal disparities funding, the AMM board said it believed sucli a move would result in a metropolibn-wide property tax increase hidden from the public. Suggestions have been raised to use a percenbge of the fiscal dbparities funds for spedfic sodal or other pre^ grams In the metropoUtan area. Because of the way F.D. b calcubted, thb would aiiKHmt to a hidden property tax inoease across the metropoUtan area. Rscal disparities dbtribution b applied after levy certification so the property tax iiKrease b automatic and not at the discretion of local offidab. Fiscal disparities b a fiscal tool that shares Coriuiwrdal/ Industrial property value for tax purposes in the seven- county metro^Ubn area. Ib priinary purpose b to help equalize the property bx wealth among the dties by sharing part of the growth in communities experiencing significant growth with those experiencing little growth. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION, WTIDNESDAY, APRIL 8, 1993 The Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Chair Maureen Bellows, Candy Rowlette, Stephen Peterson. Jeff Johnson, and Ed Cohen. City staff was represented by: Building & Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth and Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron. Debra Breneman representing North Shore Drive Marina was also in attendance. The meeting was called to order at 5:35 p.m. Gaffron started with a brief review of the B-2 Zoning District history, noting that the B-2 standards were a point of much discussion prior to adoption of tlie 1975 zoning code. At that time, the marina owners were concerned that the standards proposed for adoption could not be realistically met by the existing marinas. He noted that a review of the minutes suggest that the City recognize that flexibility in enforcement of the B-2 standards would be necessary. Gaffron also noted that landscaping was the only code provision requiring a staged time-frame for eliminating or reducing the degree of non-conformities. Most other existing non-conformities were henceforth only dealt with at the time a variance or site plan approval was requested in conjunction with application for a building permit. He further noted that a thorough review as part of a major site revamping had been done within the last five to six years with three of our six marinas. In each case, the City approved a site plan and felt that it gained certain upgrades in conformity which offset the variances for setbacks or hardcover which were needed in each case. Gaffron went on to note that aside from site related issues, there are concerns related to the operation of marinas which have been brought forth by members of the public in recent years. He related that an attempt was made by the City in 1985 to make marinas a conditional use in the B-2 zone, but that met with much resistance from the marinas. This CUP proposal was the result of some marinas not complying with certain code sections, the City denying licenses for those marinas but not forcing them to cease operations. He noted that while some but not all marinas had been issued licenses in the last two years, the Council had recently concluded it would be more appropriate to issue licenses to all marinas who apply and then deal with issues through the zoning code. He suggested that the current zoning code language probably does not contain the necessary mechanisms to require upgrades in many of the non-conformities that the public might want to see happen. Cohen noted that the marinas have existed at their present location for many years and probably are protected to a great degree as pre-existing non-conforming situations. He further noted that our code seems to be legislating for future new marinas and does not relate very well to the existing marinas. Bellows agreed, and suggested that we may need to adopt some realistic standards. Cohen indicated that the assistance of the marina operators would definitely be needed in order that the Planning Commission understand what is realistic. Deb Breneman of North Shore Drive Marina noted that she would support realistic standards, and would hope that the City would enforce those standards equally for all marinas. She also brought up the issue of the LMCD/City jurisdictional question. Bellows clarified for the Planning Commission members that generally the City has jurisdiction over the land, the LMCD has jurisdiction over the water, but there are some overlapping gray areas related to docks and boat storage on the land. Breneman indicated that LMCD has the ability to regulate parking. Rowlette suggested it may be helpful for staff to provide additional background on the LMCD code. Bellows reiterated that we need to determine realistic standards to regulate marinas in an equitable manner. She noted it probably is unfair to require major concessions of a marina making an application to the City while allowing the others to continue in relative non- compliance. Cohen questioned whether the LMCD should have control over marinas and the City should stay out of it. Gaffron noted that the City Council apparently is not completely satisfied with how the LMCD has handled its jurisdiction on the lake, and the Council is therefore unlikely to relinquish their jurisdiction on land. Cohen suggested that the City staff find out how the other Lake Minnetonka cities with marinas regulate them. Mabusth noted that the City Attorney has advised that the City could adopt ordinances to regulate decks and the lake, as long as those ordinances were not less restrictive than LMCD’s ordinances. Cohen suggested that if ail fourteen cities had identical ordinances, we might be in a better position for dealing with LMCD. Bellows noted that without a greater understanding of the Council’s perspective on the LMCD, it is very difficult to proceed. Mabusth added that the Planning Commission is at a disadvantage from the standpoint that they have never been involved in the license reviews, and generally had little involvement in dealing with the specific marinas, while there are currently members of the City Council who were quite involved in the marina committee and dealing with marinas. She noted that it would have been very helpful for today’s meeting if more of the marina operators had attended to give their perspective. Breneman suggested that those marinas may be considering some type of litigation against the City, and tliat is why they have chosen not to attend. Cohen questioned whether any new standards the Planning Commission might recommend would be enforceable, given the pre-existing status of the marinas. He questioned whether it was appropriate for the Commission to make any suggestions without further background or until the jurisdictional issues are resolved. Cohen questioned as to some of the specific issues of concern to the residents who have complained, and asked Breneman what specific complaints she might have about the other marinas. She indicated that staff had written volumes about each marina. Rowlette asked if that information could be passed on to the Planning Commission, along with ordinances from some of the other Minnetonka cities and the LMCD. Johnson asked how the Lake Use Committee factored into the picture. Gaffron noted that the Lake Use Committee after completing its review of ihe Shoreland Regulations in early 1992 spent the remainder of the year discussing marina licensing issues, but generally got sidetracked with the Maxwell Bay access and LMCD issues that never reached a conclusion on marina licensing or the B-2 standards. Cohen requested that Gaffron give a brief summary of the issues which have lead to non­ licensing of certain marinas. Gaffron proceeded to summarize the historic issues with each marina, with the issues of number of boats, dry stack and dry storage, and boat clubs generating some discussion. Planning Commission members generally expressed surprise that certain marinas had been operating for many years without licenses. There was a brief discussion regarding LMCD’s requirement that Lakeside provide ongoing documentation of all boats on the land and the water. Breneman noted that this type of record is required by the marinas’ insurance companies anyhow, and the LMCD’s former inspector many years ago made regular inspections each year using these records to verify the status of boats on the property. In regards to the marinas which have redeveloped and constructed new buildings in recent years, in response to a comment that the marinas seem to be allowed much more flexibility with setbacks and hardcover standards than we afford our residential areas, Gaffron noted that in each case where the City has allowed construction of a new marina building or expansion of parking, the City ultimately felt that the improvements being made yielded a much better product than what previously existed. After the review of the marina issues, Cohen noted that since many of these issues h: ve been continuing for many years, it will likely be very difficult from a legal standpoint to resolve them. Peterson agreed, noting that a history of denying licenses but allowing continued operation doesn’t make enforcement now any easier. It was noted that marinas who had not regularly received Orono licenses had in many cases received LMCD licenses. Plamiing Commission expressed some consternation at the fact that there are two concurrent licensing bodies. It was reiterated that the LMCD exerts jurisdiction over the water, and the City exerts jurisdiction over the land. Gaffron noted that what happens on the land does affect what happens on the water and visa versa, hence out of practical necessity there will be some overlap. Discussion ensued about the multiple jurisdictions, and whether the multiple licensing is appropriate. There also was c cussion regarding the City s enforcement ability for existing marinas, and the consequences of attempting to force a non-compliant marina to not open this spring. It was generally recognized that to do so would yield a battle in the courts, but the Planning Commission showed no consensus as to whether this would be an appropriate action. It was also acknowledged that we likely will not see any new marinas built, but only rebuilding of the existing marinas. Bellows summarized the discussion by requesting that staff provide the information previously noted, and that the committee cannot make any reasonable progress towards coming up with a suitable ordinance until the Planning Commission and Counci* can meet at a joint session at which Council can give Planning Commission a better sense of what their goals are regarding marinas, provide additional background on the jurisdictional relationship between Orono and the LMCD, providing the Commission with a clearer direction. Gaffron noted that the *^cheduled April 19th public hearing should be held over to a future date to be announced, presumably after the Planning Commission and Council have had their joint meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 6:55 p.m. I WEST HENNEPIN RECYCLING COMMISSION Grei.‘nfield-lndependence-Long Lake-Loretto-Maple Plain-Medina-Orono 1620 Maple Ave. Maple Plain, MN 55359 476-0012 April 16, 1993 ''APR 1 S '1993 To: WHRC Member Cities - Mayors and City Councils This letter is a report from your Recycling Coordinator. Recycled Tonnages & Participation cur OF CRCNO il[l(S[lQ'^[i Although two WHRC cities are below March 1992 curbside abatement, collectively our cities show a 5% total abatement increase over March 1992. Participation is up 3.5% over March 1992. The March 1993 cumulative abatement and participation report is enclosed for your review. Yardwaste Rebate Program As I reported to vou in January 1993, there will be no yardwaste rebate program after 1993. The Hennepin Board of Commissioners finally did approve 1993 yardwaste rebates. WHRC has applied for this rebate and your city can expect to receive a rebate of S^ ^bv September 1993. In return, I will Pe reguesting the reguired repoi^ting information from each city in late June and November. A copy of the application is enclosed for your files. Goodwill/Recvcle Dav In response to literally hundreds of phone calls, I have been able to arrange for phone books to be collected at this event on Saturday May 15 from 9 a.B. - 2 p.B. at the Orono Middle School Parking Lot. We will also bo collecting Goodwill donations, rigid polystyrene (aka beadboard), scrap metals, and purchasing aluminum cans. Our two curbside recycling vendors • E—Z Recyling and Wright Recycling will be providing services for this event, and Rick Perry will collect the scrap metals. The Woman's Group of Calvin Presbyterian Church of Long Lake will be preparing lunch for workers. Goodwill/Recycle Days are a popular and well attended recycling event for our cities. Future Hennepin Countv Recycling Grants At this writing, it appears there is a good chance there will be fewer dollars available to grant for community recycling programs after 1993. I do not know, nor have I been able to secure a committment from Hennepin County Recycling Management on what the possible outcome of a tipping fee conflict between the City of Minneapolis and Hennepin County will be. Conseguently, I felt it wise to advise you that your city may very likely be working with less recycling grant dollars beginning in 1994. I will keep you informed of developments. -OVER- /»v WHRl with Stf'l /»v Hi'fjfuvin G'wm/v Pntitcd Rixyileti Hifvr Future Hennepin Countv Recycling Grants (continued)mmsmmmm possible while maintaining quality service. other Enclosures of iBPQrt 1.) Legislation on licensing trash haulers I r^ently became your city does not license haulers, refer to Subd. 2(b) LicensiDfl- 2.) Waiving tipping fees for community clean-u i'" nonprofit. However, materials from clean-ups mu not private property. Call me at 476-0012 with any input or questions. Very truly yours. All cities qualify as oome from public lands. Amelia Kroeger Recycling Coordinator Enclosures: . . „. March 1993 Recycling Tonnage/Participation Report • WHRC 1993 Yardwaste Rebate Program Application . Licensing of Solid Waste Legislation • Fact Sheet on 1993 Spring Clean-ups Disposal Services •cc: WHRC Commissioners - without enclosures / . • a K • PRINTED 13-Apr-93 WEST HENNEPIN RECYCLING COMMISSION W.H.R.C. MEMBER CITY ABATEMENT REPORT CUMULATIVE YEAR TO DATE THROUGHg=> MARCH 1993 r.- - — CURBSIDE CITY EST. TOTAL TONS-1992 ACTUAL TONS RECYCLED THIS MO. CURBSIDE ACTUAL TONS ABATEMENT RECYCLED YTD GREENFIELD INDEPENDENCE LONG LAKE LORETTO MAPLE PLAIN MEDINA ORONO j— PSUB -TOTALS —CURBSIDE 502 000 11.336 1.133.000 i 15 675 007.000:11.610 162.000 4.670i ------------------------------1-------- 805 000 10.680 1.243.000 18.9201 3.257 000 50 0251 6.069.0001 122‘•18 26.613 53 093 % YTD 19 80% 16 74% 34.635 13.560 30.665 15 71 % 33 46% 15 35% 59.670 157.190 19 27% 19 30% 376.245 16 75% DROPSITE3 CITY GREENFIELD INDEPENDENCE MEDINA OTHER GOODWILL SUB -TOT ALS—OROP8ITES k-.;r .'fa» ■■’r Ur’-' -i' .. •.... ^ . . ►... I** ■ .. * , . t. .. \ .i »I' rtr . GRAND TOTAL ALL ABATEMENT - ''.V: «• ^ % • 8.069.000 ACTUAL TONS RECYCLED THIS MO. [ 1 ACTUAL TONS RECYCLED YTD . * - • * ••• 5 035 12.035 { 0 000 0 000 •V — •• • t 10 430 15.395 1 7278 22 470 0.000 0.000 TOTAL 22.743 49.000 ABATEMENT * I % YTD 145.661 428.145 21.22% YTD W.H.R.C. ABATEMENT PERCENTAGE BY CITY AS OF MARCH 1993 »00% >0 00% 15 00% f0CD% 150D% %oe% PRINTED 13-Apr-93 WEST HENNEPIN RECVTL NG COMMISSION W.H.R.C. MEMBER CITY PARTICIPATION REPORT CUMULATIVE YEAR TO DATE THROUGH= = >__mahch_J»?3 CITY GREEN-INOEPEN- 1 1 LONG MAPLE PLAIN ' MB3INA ; 1 1 1 ORONO i TOTAL 1 AVERAGEFIELDDENCE 'LAKE LORE! TO TOTAL HOMES •iS'/L *» • - y% • *' ■ • . V' "- «i '/ii-^zroo # RECYCUNG ___________________________1 JANUARY , 2^1 395!290 1 1 96i i 260 ! 596!1 1J40^^ 3220-^460 FEBRUARY 226 400!260 i1 10^1 235 1 610 1270 3.121 446^ -----------------------------------------4 MARCH 2001 i—^296 106 1 2C1 i 590 ^ 1290i 3.139,446'---------------------1 1 1 APRIL r---- ~1oi o‘0 o'1 0 i 0 ! 0*0| MAY ol 1 ---------------------H 0^ 1 0 oi i 0 i ....^0 Oi ____o] JUNE _________________________i 0 1 —---------------------------- I Oi 0 0 0 ! 0 ! i 0 [ 0;o| 1 JULY: ►------------------------------- 0 0 0 0 0 0 : 1 0 oi AUGUST 0 --------------------^0 oi! 0 O'0 r 0 0 8EFTBIBER 0 oi ol o!oi 1 Ol Ol oi> ----—------—u- 0 OCTOBER , - - ■ - -i 0 ■—^oii 01 0 ' oj 0 1 01 0 NOVEIIBER 0!i 0^ 1 ------------------1 0^ 1-----------------------^ ! 0 0 0;0|oi DECEIIBER 0 0'0 1 0 O:’ 0;0|0 0* AVG. # RECYCLING, ........ 2261 396 288 j 100 252 596 1,300 3.160 451 • % RECYCLING < 46.10%42.20% 1 46.21% i 70.42%!49.22%!59.24%48.15%49.26% 1 49.26%! ■ ' .........................-11 I CUMULATiVE Y.T.D. THROUGH= = >MARCH 1993 00 00%^T HENNEPIN COUNTY YARD WASTE RE6A f£ Af'HUCA i iuinJanuary 1,1993 • December 31,1993 WEST ilENNEPIN RECYCLING COMMISSION Cities of: Greenfield, Independence, CJty See Att-'-hed frequency ol cou. (s.^ <V*eiOyj Varies Pay a« oj/naca Meffioa Ol Cciiecacn; la SaggM Q Yes □ No □Detacoed QCcntainefS QCiref C.ia/5e to Hsnid.; M / \ B. Prop-Oft Collection: Name/Aoci«»o.s.io gee Attached ____________________________________________ Penoo Opefaied (e g. May Oct) | Oay» ano r^ou3 ctperaupo J r-nono No. 476-0012 Varies vH Residents □ Haulefs □ Lawn Svcs " pr>of» Name/Accress or bite Penoo Operateo (t.g. May- Oct) Lays aoo hours uperauon U Avauasie ror us* □ ResigenB □Haulefs Q Lawn Svcs ili ’ ptaPQSAL-SYSln^^?^^^ - '' .fey-; " .1 Name/Address of Sil# cities have a composting system y: . rxjn# No. 476-0012 I .........- At tacned HENNEPIN COUNTY YARDWASTE APPLICATION January 1, 1993 - December 31, 1993 WEST HENNEPIN RECYCLING COMMISSION Cities of: Greenfield, Independence, Long Lake, Loretto Maple Plain, Medina and Orono Part T. TONNAGE This is combined tonnage or cubic yards estimated total for all 7 cities. Loretto and Maple Plain have reported yardwaste in tons. The other cities have reported in cubic yards. Loretto “ 12 tons Greenfield - 102 cu. yds. Long Lake - 286 cu. yds. Orono - 343 cu. yds. Maple Plain - 61 tons Independence - 64 cu. yds.* Medina - 225 cu. yds. * independence is considering using Orono yardwaste days for its residents. A decision has not yet been finalized. Part IT. COLLECTION A. Curbside Three of the 7 cities offer curbside collection for residents. Long Lake - Provides two a year. One in spring & one in fall. Loretto - Provides two collection days a year. Maple Plain - Collected on a separate weekly route. B. Drop-Off All 7 cities (save possibly Independence) provide drop-off days for residents. See program descriptions. Part TTI. All 7 cities compost leaves and grass and make available for residents use. Part IV Greenfield - $934 Long Lake - $10,697 Maple Plain - $2,580 Orono - $6,350 Independence - $50 Loretto - $375 Medina - $1,550 -OVER- Pnrt V. PnOC;RAM DESCRIPTIONS Greenfield: The City contracts with Bursch Brothers to provide a drop-off location for residents' yard waste on Monday evenings and Saturday mornings through the growing season. Independence: The City did not have a yard waste program in 1992 but is considering working with Orono to provide certain days when residents can take yard waste to Orono site. Long Lake: The City provides a site for residents and haulers to dispose of leaves & grass. The City maintains the site as a compost site. The City also provides two curbside yardwaste days a year - one in spring & one in fall. The City also contracts with a private vendor for chipping & disposal of brush. Loretto: The City contracts with its waste hauler to collect leaves & grass from residents for two curbside yard waste collections a year. The haulers dispose of the collected material at a city-owned site for composting, or eventual landspreading. Maple Plain: As part of a contract for hauling garbage in the City, Randy's Sanitation collects yard waste on a separate weekly route. They deposit it at the City's compost site where the public works crew maintains the pile as it decomposes. Medina: The City hosts yard waste drop-off collections in the spring and fall of each year. Leaves & grass are being composted on City property. Residents continue to dispose of grass at the site through the summer. Orono: The City provides a staffed yard waste drop-off site for residents several Saturdays throughout the growing season. Yard waste is composted ard available for residents' use. The City also contracts with a large shredder and offers shredded mulch to residents. Printed on roeycl^d pep«r Hennepin CountyDepartment of Environmental Management 1993 Spring Cleanup Disposal Services for Non-Profit GroupsFact SheetProgram: Services: Unacceptable Material: Eligible Organizations: Facility Location: Hours: Non-Profit Organizations may receive free disposal service for up to two, two-day publicly oriented cleanup projects per year. The free disposal applies only to cleanup of public lands and rights of way. Free disposal services at the Brooklyn Park Transfer Station and Recycling Center for trash, tree waste, appliances, bulky items, tires and recyclables collected on public lands. Material has to be separated by type of material. Materials from cleanup of private property b not eligible for free dbposal. Household Hazardous Waste or any Hazardous Waste, and more than a small quantity of Consumer Electronics (for questions about Consumer Electronics call (^eryl Lofrano- Zaske at 348-8992). Nonprofit service organizations such as the Jaycees, Boy Scouts and Giri Scouts that organize events that include cleanup of publicly owned lands and rights-of-way. The sponsoring organization must call 348-6510 before the cleam^ project to get a registration form. Brooklyn Park Transfer Station & Recycling Center 8100 Jefferson Highway Brooklyn Park, MN 7am - 9pm Mon - Fri 7am - 6pm Sat To register for thb program or for more information call Brent Lindgren at 348-6510. Arrangements for delivery of materiab to the facility must be made ahead of time to aDow adequate staff and storage space. Mwto; TIm Brooklyn Park Transfer Statioa and Recyclinf Ceotar is oot equipped to han dle the foUofwiaf wi.fwaU If you hnve aay of these items call the County at 34t-S9t4 for iformatioa oa di^oad optiona. oHasardous Wasu From Busiocsaaa • Amwihmitioii alofectious Waste ORadioacdva Material oExplosivea •Compressed Gas Cylinders APPLICATIONNONPROnT ORGANIZATION SPONSORNuneStrec(/PO BoxCily/State/Zip ConUct Phone ADDRESS OF CLEANUP SITE DATE AND HOURS OF CLEANUP TYPE OF WASTE ITEM CHECK HAULER INFORMATION Nune SlfMl/PO loi Cky/Suic/Zip PhOM ESTIMATED WASTE QUANTITY /115A.923Subd. 6. Rules. The commissioner of revenue may adopt rules necessary to implement this section.HIST: 1989 c 325 s 21; 1990 c 604 art 10 s 26; 1991 c 337 s 39,40115A.924 Repealed, 1990 c 604 art 10 s 32115A.925 Repealed, 1990 c 604 art 10 s 32115A.927 Repealed, 1990 c 604 art 10 s 32 115A.928 Repealed, 1990 c 604 art 10 s 32 115A.929 FEES; ACCOUNTING. Each local government unit that collects a fee under section 115A.919, 115A.921, or 1 15 A.923 shall account for all revenue collected from the fee, together with interest earned on the revenue from the fee, separately from other revenue collected by the local government unit and shall report revenue collected from the fee and use of the revenue separately from other revenue and use of revenue in any required financial repo’’. or audit. HIST: 1991 c 337 s 41 LICENSING OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION 115A.93 LICENSING OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION. Subdivision 1. License required. A person may not collect mixed municipal solid waste for hire without a license from the jurisdiction where the mixed municipal solid waste is collected. Subd. 2. Licensing, (a) Each city and town may issue licenses for persons to collect mixed municipal solid waste for hire within their jurisdictions. (b) County boards shall by resolution adopt the licensing authority of a city or town that does not issue licenses. A county may delegate its licensing authority to a consortium of counties or to municipalities to license collection of mix«^ municipal solid waste within the county. Subd. 3. License requirements; pricing based on volume or weight, (a) A licensing authority shall require th« licensees to impose charges for collection of mixed municipal solid waste vary that increase with the volume or weight of the waste collected. (b) A licensing authority may impose requirements that are consistent with the county’s solid waste policies as a condition of receiving and maintaining a license. (c) A licensing authority shall prohibit mixed municipal solid waste collectors from imposing a greater charge on residents who recycle than on residents who do not recycle. Subd. 3a. Volume requirement. A licensing authority that requires a pricing system based on volume instead of weight under subdivision 3 shall determine a base unit size for an average small quantity household generator and establish, or require the licensee to establish, a multiple unit pricing system that ensures that amounts of waste generated in excess of the base unit amount are priced higher than the base unit price. Subd. 4. Date certain. By January 1, 1993, each county shall ensure that each city or town within the county requires each mixed municipal solid waste collector that provides curbside collection service in the city or town to obtain a license under this section or the 115A.93county shall direcUy require and issue the licenses. No person may collect mixed municipalsolid waste after January 1, 1993, without a license.HIST: lSpl989 c 1 »rt 20 s 8; 1991 c 337 s 42,43; 1992 c 593 s 25,26 NOTE: Subdivisicn Sa is effective January 1. 1994.115A.9301 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION; VOLUMEr OR WEIGHT-BASEDSiihdivLsIon 1. Requirement. A local government unit that-£OHgCts char ges for, soliddir«iiv from .eneraiors shall irtiplemcnt ch«rg« frM intftast as volume or wpi<>ht of the waste collected on-site from each ECneralQr*? Of pl^gg ■Q^ business i^gfeases. ... SubcLl. Vofiir*r If a local government unit imolemgms a pnClPg SYStC.m based on volume instead of weight under subdivision 1. it Shall dCtCrming a t>aSC UhU Si^g for an average small niiantitv household generator and establish muUiPlg UOU PPCmg syjlgm that ensures that amounts of waste generated in excess of thC baSC UPU amount are ppcgd higher than the base unit price. HlSTi 1992 c S93 t 27 NOTE: # Subdivision 1 is ^eaive January 1, 1993. • Subdivision 2 is ^eaht January 1, 1994. PROPOSED OUTLINE OP THE HIGHWAY 12 ECONOMIC/LAND USE IMPACT STUDY TO BE CONDUCTED BY MNDOT AS PART OF THE E.I.S. PROCESSThere is a core difference between the corridor study as it relates to the Long Lake and Orono segments and other corridor studies that include a bypass option. In most cases a bypass is built around a freestanding city at the fringe of the developed area of the city. Here we have the bypass being built in a different city and in a developing area - developing in a direction different from the type of development a bypass would bring. In a standard bypass situation, the bypass is considered to be an economic development project for the city. The bypass draws new and in most cases some existing businesses to it. All of these businesses remain in the same city. Here, businesses and commercial development potential would be moving from one city to anc'-her. This core difference requires that the economic and 1> nd impact study includes several specific items; they are as follows: 1. Conduct a development/redevelopment pocential study for each corridor assuming the developmert is driven by the market and not by current zoning. The study should include several development scenarios for each corridor, including the current proposed alignment for each corridor and any changes to the alignments that would be advantageous to development or redevelopment. The study should include determinations regarding expected land uses, densities, locations and time frames. The study should be conducted by a consultant group with expertise in market analysis, land planning, development and traffic engineering; and with particular experience in how land develops in anticipation of or in response to new transportation facilities. This development potential study will be an important input to the analysis of relocation and financial impacts. a. ) Bypass alternatives. Provide development potential scenarios and an indication of the most likely type and intensity of development to be expected within a 10 to 20 year time frame based on the types of land uses that generally occur along similar bypasses. b. ) Current corridor. The study should provide an analysis of the feasibility of redevelopment to provide an indication of the most realistic type and intensity of development potential for the downtown area. 2. Comprehensive Plan and zoning changes. a.) Current corridor. The study should determine Comprehensive Plan and zoning changes needed to achieve the projected development potential and/or to mitigate economic impacts on existing businesses. r*irn« lOA] r«rAi m:X9\ r»T«T«i«] Miil« ^imoi L^m^^ ■ I Ml MtW Mil* I MfW r»K»i '1 •wr»r«i s535f!f^ 'wmiL wixm^ '/TilT aiigayj ^Smm Please state your reasons for wanting to serve on this Connnission (Please be as specific as possible. Dse additional sheet if necessary .) fff■ flB\U What is your view of the role of the Comniission? I m T. THAT TUS RAKj>0 IK7=> __________/ fl^fer At> UJ H.ii£0^TEC> n'Au^uc-^ ~P 'F(MJ=-lic Thte -mft rnnf. iajp. r7f5&r -m& l(^DfU(pgp<L- p(A»OMt^ feCE^ . ^ Oth«c Comments: (Ose this space to include any *“'«er infocmatioo you would like the City Council to consider, « you feel Is teleeant to the appointment you are also attach other materials you would like the Council t considere) \axi IDPrJEl I ftJfc 'ftw fCU C'< ,^$0.82(0 -MF, fqf^Tnta. Hr TMft ?.0. liT. hfED T-. RT TO T?QT f5PC-tt: UJD fniAPuy- fgwiN;<g PW:^ fpygoOAut\B^ i^ye-ar^:iJOfb> A /npGgp^or- I understand this appointment may be discussed at a public meeting. XfUJ^ __-^ Sionature flJ • Maureen Steele Bellows AlA.\RcniTE(rnrRR r ¥■ i *.• • r?0M: c?r MEMORANDUM ZO npfl) Ms. Jeanne Masbuth , . . ^ ^Planning and Zoning Administrator Maureen Steele Bellows. AIAActing Chair, Orono Planning Commission Resume for Council “ ■ r <*%t r:f TI 1 1 uou 1 o 1 1 e to say that it has been areal challenge to attempt to fill thet-.uf oast planning Commission Chair. Charlie nas •erved bur c«?mmunity extremely well in the past and 11 e- o: tiMo to see him mo'^e onv;ard and upward to *.re C.iunc'1 . e^/en if It does create a void on the Plannin*^ The enclosed resum# will. I hope, serve to acquaint the Cc;ijnci' with my academic and professional background.A verv current addition to the membersnip/boards •jortibn shoula indued ray recent appointment to the urono Hockey Boosters Board of Directors. If I remember correctly, we were asked ”9 "?Voriginal Interview for a briefoersofai situations as well as a statement about our sense of the most important issues facing our City. ! am a divorced mother of two young boys, ages six and nine, both of whom currently attend Schumann Elementary. Ve have participated for five years n various sports activities available to children in our school district. I have lived In Orono for nine y««£® and have served on the Planning Commission for seven year s. ■ ofigiivil ly from Maisciichueetts and have ^een first •land what rampant development can do to communities, fts an arcnitect and planner I also knw the mat highway development can Pfo<3uce. In my opinion the most urgent issues facing our community right nw are t^ e proposed expansion or Highway and ‘pressure this would bring to bear upon our sraiidaicis. It is my intent to work for the development or an Improved Hlgnway 12 within the ®^|®tlng corridor to Maintain our existing development standards. ;f reapcn»nred to the Planning Commission I youldTn -ifive to bring as much of our substannara ;iroperti»*s up to our current zon I ng, standards. I am i a.; ret-att-d in ma^^ing the Planning Commission a t-iicaut i ■ »- body In the sense that i believe we should 3400 Watertown Road • Long Lake, MN 55386 • (612) 475* p;.- . pfin'^for ana*protect*out"communi ty*’»nd'^envlronmenf«l «i -n:ict»rds. vouM 1 Ke to see our community worklno together tos aind oleygrounds as well as to work^nhatoc^ our o^r<^s i " ^ r Aise chi1dren. Thank you all for your consideration. f/: MiiftliitfII - .....- —Vy. I IIIIiiiii|(iiiiiiif^ till r • i ^>J -•If ‘S .■-i - . V- -ij • Wi u ‘;v ;; / • Maureen Steele Bellows AIA .VRCUlTECnrRE MAtlPgiaj STgELE BELLOWS BOUCATION S(PBRIENCB 400 Watertown B. Arch. 1977 University of Minnesota 5i?iisVS?*8oV?Si?" 'he Pingree School I960 louth Hamilton, Massachusetts M. STEELE 3400 water _ Long LAke, MN _ BELLOWS ARCHITECTUREtertown Road Sole proprietorship EO Ma OS ARCHITECTURE ^ celsior, Minnesota 1991 to J.arch 1991 to January 1993 Project Manager/pianner M. STEELE BELLOWSkis ms’tS'Riis_ _ _ARCHITECTURE high end residential properties. ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR^ ^ Department of Architecture September*l904'tb June 1986 Taught first year design studio. ARCHITECTS INC. Ksfsisni? ;??S??Sc{Sr5!retail and INGS & MERRILL "ols,to January 1984 3400 Watertown Road • Long Lake. MN 6B386 * (012) 475-ii 4 .{I;: r !-- V ■ ■ . .r- m.*mm MINBER8H1P8/B0AR0S :.c.LBCTBD PROJBCfS . m ‘■i- ■ C. P. MURPHY &.ASSOCIATES (NOW MURPHY/^.,ww ..«^^w*/JAHN) 5fpr f f * to^November 1980 PERKINS AND WILL Chicago, Illinois HAMNEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON M1 nneapoUs, Mlnnesota MINNEAPOLIS CITY PLANNING DEPT. Minneapolis,Minnesota MODELRoxbui_ _ CITIES PROGRAM^loxbury, Massachusetts j^erlcan Architects Chair, Orono Planning Conmlssion Vice Chair, State Designer Selection Board "‘??TS«?*L5S§5iiSg ‘Xf Sa . f!?lS?S''il!aleslgn Member, Board of.Ar ^nd Surveying, Lan Interior Design 8a?houn Square, Minneapolis MNDOT METRO MOVE ^Rosev11Te, Minnesota CHASKA SCHOOL DISTRICT Chaska,Minnesota MINNETONKA SCHOOL DISTRICT Minnetonka, Minnesota UNIVERSITY OP TECHNOLOGY Baghdad, Iraq MC MORMICK Cmro II (Chicago, IlIlnoTs STATE OP ILLINOIS BUILDING Chicago, Illinois BOARD OF TRADE ADDITION Chicago, Illinois ■I 1,L.-------[ I r sHnii h^fiin 4 ;• 5?:?= 'W : % r. • . -V Kv; V titeiifeirtlf .b >v'r. \ it?' fV.-• MADISON P^AZAChicago» IIIInols AL-BAAB BANK BahrManama» Bahrain FIGORORA PLAZA L08 AngngSles, California BS'Iig.?£S“c.U«ornU AM AUDITS WATSONMBI5Uppar Whlteflsh Lake WATSON RESIDENCE Medina, Minnesota RINEK RESIDENCE Edina, Minnesota KELLEY RESIDENCE Orono, Minnesota SON0!S8."B?iS55Ef. §7iSJI?l8f^fnn.-otA L. R. ANDERSON,RESIDDICE H1nneapolls, M1nnesota 6. ANDERSON RESIDENCE Wayxata, Minnesota . d TORST RESIDENCE Deephaven, Minnesota fia^ataf 8^nnesota g55J8S5eS“ft?SIS5ota 8ee^aven?^M 1 nnesot a ' K H '* ■ k- '•r M APR-23-93 FRI 10:33 GAGE MARKETING GROUP FAX NO. 5953989 P.Ol Ef." fee:: k W-. GAGE April 23 1993 ToI City of oronoAttontion t Janio FromI Candy Aonlatto Floaao find anoloaod tho application you raguaatad ratumad. X aa atilX eonfuaad aa to %diathar thia fora ia for appraeiatad aora tiaa to gat thia inforaation ratumad to you and to put aora thought into ay raaponaaa. Hovavar Ufidar tha oirouBataneaa X hopa thia will auffioa^ 040f i¥iN^ /MAICniNC 4*^0 t|4¥ll l•ll• 9i$tWAf fJft. afNWfafOiiJ, MM Si44i»i^iS r#!? P«»- .irifc ^ -.VV.V ,■•* H MIMIII 9* 9*f( ••#** ■I I. ■■ ./■ ‘ >5 'i-jffMwi' I' 'iffc-i r.:& •v'J.’'— 5 •d."’’'-■•■■ ■ <'i *«IM « ••«• «IWI W V «# V W W W 04/21/93 12:12 THE CITY OF ORONO 012-473-7337 002 • • • ^ I i It: |y-' ll i m fk Hi' r-ri. |:'r ¥'•k: CiHT<^BONO • • •• >m oninv ew*a««i0M COMiMi*" ***' • • AMC004 ri f0*ii0 coB«iw*®® Q0P|MiBi0y ♦••Jl FO0C0 (H0*0) flif 1'f if'•- ^ ^ nannlBS Co«»l*«*®» • •J72^ •••« OUiem » lip fBlOfk <10 4V7 y>(W)T9 stA2£^ ■ HtBi4BA« mi O10BO t9 yo<‘ r1 1 ■JI t mhiii -ift MM,mm ■ A'mmi ■mM ■■"■yfeiSi, . , ■; ■ '■'■' m-mM rnmm si®'? *V ‘v ‘■' ...V. ..V■;■^■;;:vV .: nCi\ L^'Os^ I i\i 4 w ^“1 I4tilk4bte« i«l%l94/21^ 12t 13 » t *« » WWwwwmv t • «« V* • • • • •THC city of OROHO 612-473-7337 009• r«6*00» foF w*otln9 to »erve on tbi® C«i««5oo•• »"»“»>*• "•• .aaitl.Ml mhmmt If" •• _____________ jy ____ • • 7> r-.' r^rrffyr<^ i/l.jun Ai'T/7.^Aj^ /Jyvirrrfy A/9r7?tffc It-^ I • • • •i'- f» ^untAlt>**i,il> '‘‘ ><fa*a/«>r..<-n il' TW^TTacift ntal {«•• ***• •>"**- ** mSi*^“*• il« ” ito *ta e^LS?t:i^ .» SmS» I U: - (■/—---------------r-f ^sy>a. fff.ryAAJ I I t Oi* •fP«*****®^ ^ 4io««i«^ »b • ’ & U- 21.'S3 ll:4y 1.‘.c. I I Or LroiU t>12"M > ■ j‘j <L)U2V% Please state yoor reasons for vaotin9 to serve on this Connaissiou f (Please be as specific as possible. Ose additional sheet if necessary.) ‘ / ( / ' * j / W h^'r'A' id s^'-^ 9 1/^ , >■'' (Oh^^ L v£’\u rTXtJCiiYtA __-^f-vr, —LI ^ ■VS4-^^L- ', tULy'U'ccX >W UCA^' ,1 y . / / T # / > ^ y ^ 4(!vW" 4*0 Ci^t^ n f.'cirytL /J^xt/l-ort^/j-r / wUtVs ywr^vlew of the role of the Coemission? To-^CC-M,-lO / _L ^Urk iA^A n f Oj y- ■ ^'•^ ‘ -r7ia> PilcC^^ Mv^ I Uj. r'^gl^ /I ........................................................................ , 7 Ibc X a<fe any forthmr to coomlder# or. thmt ;t%%*r«t«r.rs*~yV,~Vafd liVe “J other CoBsentas j;?^nps^to ‘*s. y^P«v-«.jL7i ’^ Tf*S:! A.^r. v< /pni HO Lyi frr! ly y I anderstend this appointment Bay be discussed at a public Da t Stephen C. Peterson 1065 Tamarack Drive Orono, MN 55356 612-473-0198 Objective: To function in a mcinageinent position with an electrical distributor, preferably with significant responsibility in the administrative cind operations areas, marketing and sales. Background Sunmary: 25 yeeurs experience in the electrical industry including distributor a^^i manufacturer rep agency business. Proven cdbility to serve as a top executive, many years as mana­ ger of multi-mi 11 ion dollar branch operations. Business Experience: JH Leurson Electric, 1992 to present. Golden Valley Branch Manager with total day-to-day responsibilities including manag'.ng a total of 43 employees, all sales, customer service, quotations, union warehouse, contract sales, and marketing activities. Report directly to Corporate Operations Manager eind company President. Incre^lsed sales first year 12%, 20% budget increase forecasted in 1993. LESOO, Inc., 1988-1992. Manufacturers rep agency in the TVin Cities Handling 17 major electrical manufacturing lines including Hubbell/Raco, Hubbell/Killetrk, Gould- Shavxnut Fuses, Triangle Pipe A Wire, Intermatic, Wiege- mann Enclosures. Outside sales responsibilities Included sales and training, joint cedis, marketing support such as counter days, trade shows aitd engineering calls. Sterling Electric Company, 1984-1988. Ccxitractor Sales Manager/Operations Manager with Sales Manager respon­ sibility for 6 outside sales individuals. Increas^ sales in contractor market and expanded major job lighting and switchgear per^traticxi in the Twin Cities market area. Operations Manager responsibilities included full day- to-day management of 73 employees in purchasing, inside sales, customer service, quotations, lighting depart­ ment, union warehouse. Reported directly to Vice-Presi­ dent of Marketing arxi Company Presictent. •* ■ '■«- r« ■ *7:1 Mrai LCiii«i •I::) 4cf«tltrSl rs: I »i; r»T¥r=r»Kw»T#» r«w*r«7 fjtm9 «•! r#rs?sT» Education; Mankato State College, 1969-1972. Three years general eduacatj.on. Courses completed for a minor in History, Pre-Law/Business major courses. Graduate Mankato High School. Various courses and technical seminars betv;een 1969 and 1992. General Electric lairp Course, Nela Paurk, Cleveland, Ohio. General Electric Conmercial Lighting Course, Hen­ dersonville, North Carolina. Meuiagement By CA)jectives Course, Hennepin Technical School. Credit & Collections Course, NAED. Square D Motor control & Distribution Courses. Hubbell/Raco Sales Course, South Bend, Indiana. Gould-Shawmut Fuse Technology Course. Financial Manage­ ment & control Of A Small Business, Dealing Witii Staff, College Of St. Thomas. Professional Activities; NAED, lES, Minnesota Electrical Association, 1991-1992 NEMRA Local Area President, 1991-present Orono Planning Conmission Member. Military Service; Minnesota Army National Guard, 1972-1978. Rank Sgt. E-5. Security Clearance Secret Crypto. Personal; Health-excellent. Date Of Birth^une 23, 1951. Marital St js-married, tvio children. Hobbies-hunting, boating, skiing. U4 *:o • * , o O f A.i >-» 1 ^ .> -4 -4 i > i •>12;06 1 A<4\ t. *1.1 •» • ‘4U- • C4- ^t- — th= c :ty of c '5cnp si2-4?3-ri3r 002 ■? ' 4 >1 CITY of ORON Mioi3c >;u ! OCns ?»cOSceBakfi< Cr Ba.*f Mim^scti £s32J-0O^ TSLEW0NT:-473-'^r7 • fX'^-473-AnO 3LPPtICA0?ICN FOR CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMISSIONS Commission Applying For: Q Park® Commission Community Task Force (Name) ^ Planning Commission Name Address Edoa/td M. Cohm 1660 Souik Hiqkoaif JOO, PaMite Piazza, SiUtZ 31 i, St. LoaU Pakh, UN 55416 post Office ft Zip Code 554T6 Telephone <H)(W)544-4300 .<esident of Orono ^years Work Raperienee? KiXo'ui^ at Lau 4anc££j^59 # *fl255S®c “ei^t AB Amt>uau> lUAtMif <uuL UAuJiMi [am LamU\ Ccti^ Uiu»«*^ MSA - CttM Load* 7953; QatnakuiL Ufiive^JUtu M^A - 1955 (hUvt/lAitXU xti HiMSgAnftT 7 LB - I9S9 CiTlc eiMl ▼olant-.r Activities (P-»t and present); GaldfM VMfJi Sduiol BoaJtd (T^ giVrirr/<4*A ' ;8W Uoiiusao^ii Aaaccttf^nn A f I Crrr CF C-JCNG 612-^73-73.3"'E03 •V, •-■ ■-.- C.3 please state your raasons for wanting to aerve on this CooaissioD (Please be as specific as possible. Dse additional sheet if necessary.) Jlficdl u/Li'. Aohii^LiKtlJ^"AjI J?rt .1 Af- ill!. ^ f°"3 - te^ FnJL luAJJfifJi e^nafJJ{jn/i^JnnA ttmA nonJ^mt^ T ,r>^^u^A no^an y/u> y-^ my onlitioH apfiticaJtLon& that I h^tue ^ilZzd oiit. What ia your slew of the role of the Coamission? The fLole. oi th^ CamUslon ii to tndta.voA to utoJtk uutk the. clttf th^wu^on. —OjmaJtt pnopt^ idJL JJllL 'pajg^l/jr'ot Ojidkd, Oaono hoA mUntcujnM a. zhadikx^ oi homes pieces o£ fteaJL estate {aUbeit Casco Point and otkens that tewc ‘l^^TOL UA SOntC Al^^ltUJUJJ] ftlU. cu. JLKJOJ^ J tddh ^jaakfid zo ncUMStoAnln^ tke~koz^ oi Onano as a comminltif volth some gKaath and a matUAe outlook-on taoaJui the jutune^ The Kote oi the Commission Is to cojouf out and advise as to the utlshes oj the on and Other CeisseDtet (Ose this specs to inclade ooy farther lofoiBuitloa yoa li?®. toyo« ,..X else etteeta consider.) QAano. We oAe. sttlt TboSind'to move'to Olono and Have been ees^uienzs, i nave been outside th^ cxmmnita joe a^oelmateJbt too weehs and hoveia^ taitt be mav4Jia back.. sftO/L^tltf. At the peesent time I am tempoAcuuO/ living outside o4 Oaoiw.. ~ ~ ank Have been residents, I have been t oBderptiiad e!H» app«inti».at Bay b« di»P-«»»d at a public l^AW OFFICES EDWARD M. COHEN, P.A. RARKDAl_E PL^AZA. SUITE 3 IB 1 660 SOUTH HIGHWAY 1 OO ST. LOUIS PARK. MINNESOTA 53416 (6 I 2) 5AA A300 facsimile (6 I 2) 5AA 1 B73 February 21, 1991 Orono City Council P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Honorable City Council Members: I have been advised by Jean Mabusth that if I wish reappointment to the Orono Planning Commission, I should indicate by communication to you. I would like to be reappointed to the Planning Commission for the upcoming term. As I understand it, I am the rural member of the Planning Commission and it is a three-year term. I have enjoyed the preceding three years, and I feel that as the oldest member of the commission, and the only attorney, I do add something to the membership. Candidly, being an attorney in the eyes of lay people may not be a recommendation, but I do feel I bring a different viewpoint on occasion. I have missed one meeting each year (always a March vacation), but other than that, I think my attendance has been quite* good. I feel strongly about preserving the quality of life that we have in Orono, and as most of you know, I am extremely interested in the upgrading of Highway 12. If you wish an interview again, or anything further, I certainly will be glad to meet with you. You may take this letter as my reapplication for re-enlistment. Thank you for your courtesy. Very truly yours. Edward M. Cohen EMC/cs EDWARD M. COHEN. P. A. attowncy at law Pa Aa OAlC SutTC 200 5401 Gamolc Oriyc ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55416 (6iz; S46-«300 January 6, 1987 Mr. Mark Bernhardson City Manager City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay# MN 55323 Dear Mr. Bernhardson: Thank you for the courtesy of allowing me to make this application in a somewhat untimely fashion. Very briefly, I am a graduate of Harvard College (with honors) 1953, majoring in American History and Literature; of the graduate school of Columbia UniveLsity (M.B.A.), 1955, majoring in finance and accounting; and lastly a graduate of the Law School of the University of Minnesota (J.D.) 1959. I have been a practicing attorney in the State of Minnesota since 1959, presently officing at the above address and previously maintaining addresses in earlier years at 1300 Shelard Tower, St. Louis Park, MN and 954 Midland Bank Building, Minneapolis, MN. As a practicing attorney, I have appeared on many occasions before various planning commissions of many municipalities in the Metropolitan area. I do not specialize in this, but in the course of representing corporations, there have been appearances especially with regard to the activities cf restaurants and specialized commercial stores. For two years, while President of Oak Ridge Country Club (and on other occasions) , I represented that organization before the Minnetonka a^d Hopkins Planning Commissions while property we had sold was rezoned, a developer was building adjacent to the Club, and the Club itself was attempting to fence its entire boundary. While not major appearances, I have nevertheless acquired a working knowledge of Planning Commissions, City Councils and their interrelationships and workings, all of which would be of assistance to me if appointed. For many years I was a resident of the City of Golden Valley and participated in community affairs, and further was a member of the Golden Valley School Board for approximately 5 years until Mr. Bernhardson January 6, 1987 Page two the school itself merged with the Hopkins School District. I was chosen by my contemporaries on the School Board to be the Golden Valley representative on the merged school board but because I had removed my children from public school and enrolled them in a private school, I did not feel it appropriate to take the position. We have resided in Orono at 519 N. FerndaTe Road since 1983 and plan on staying as residents of Orono for an indeffinate period of time. I have always been interested in community affairs and participating in the same. I do feel, now that our children are grown, having one in college and the other as a Junior in high school, there is ample time available for me to devote my energies to ths betterment of our community. I am certainly not knowledgable in the problems facing Orono nor any past difficulties that the Village may have had (and/or conversely the good things that have happened) but I consider myself a competent person, willing to work and one whose background in legal, business, political and community affairs would enable me to make fair and impartial decisions. I thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, /V]. Edward M. Cohen EMC/j1 04/21/93 12:19 TVE city CF aRCND 612-473-7357 CITY of ORONO Munrct|MlO««w TEUmorn • 473-735r • ECC *47>4$t0 002 APPLZCATSOS FOR CITIZEN ADVISORY COKKZSSZONS Comml«*lon Applylo^ Po*i n P«£Kfl conmlaalun n Cemnttfflty Taak Fokoo (N»ma> rr* Plfli ting Crtntmlaoioil Nano ‘Charles L. Schroeder ASdraaS West Faro Road poat Office & Zip Code Long Lake, MN 55356 Telephone <H)476-6A92 (W] 673-6628 Reeideet of Orono yeara Work ispaaieaeat See acCached reaufiie. adventloo Sa« attached resume. Cisrto and Toloataav AetlTitlaa (pant and pcaaaet)t S<>«> attached twauma. 24/21/93 12:19 THE CITY OP ORONO 612-473-7357 003 • •*vour ra«Bon« for wanting to aorva on thia CoonBlealon f ,Vl..“c./epe=‘«« “ '<>« .aaitlon.l if naeoaaary•) Sul; aLLaclitd. ________________ . ..- What la yo«« CMwlsslon? The role of the Planning Coimnlsslon Is an advlsoiy one to the Cltv rr>'inr-<l. The Council taklae Input from the Conimlsston «nd apr.tV.f»T-o anH mt keA. flftal decision's based on all the facts. The CoTOT>l3siun*8 job Is to ascertain jLhe facts and mak4 recommendationa to the Council In lipht of the CQiimreheiiai.ve Plan and City Code. yoxt tmml i» to th« a^injp^« • th« Couooll to ilttn attaeli otttar ■atarlala you woolo oooiiidor*) X undoratand tbia appoiotoont mmy be dieooo**^ •« • pobllc Date CHARLES L. SCHROEOER ATTACHMENT I have very much enjoyed my tenure on the Planning Commission and would like to contlntje serving. I like being Involved in the community and feel the Commission has several important functions to fulfill. My interest Is in '.nterpreting and maintaining the integrity of the Comprehensive Plan as well as the City Code. The Comprehensive Plan is the community's best sense of how it wants to be from a land use perspective. The basis desire of the community, as expressed in the Plan, is to retain a well-developed sense of environmental awareness. Orono is unique in terms of its potential impact on Lake Minnetonka as well as other lakes, on wetlands, and on rural areas in general. As an example, the Lake Use Committee, on which I serve, deals with the Issue of adopting new shoreland regulations tor Oronc that will serve our needs and those of the DNR. The community has clearly expressed Its interest in maintaining the beauty and relatively undeveloped nature of the City. This should continue. In my opinion. At the same tinw, Orono faces the usual pressures to "change." This can nean development in the traditional sense. For example, as the state nrx)ves inexorably toward deciding what to do about Highway 12, development pressures will Intensify. The nature and placement of this roadway will be the single most Important issue facing the Commission, and the City, for decades. Depending r i placement. It will add rTKire hardcover than any number of houses, not to mention the effect of "splitting the City In two." I look forward to Influencing that discussion and its subsequent effects as a continuing member of the Commission. I feel I continue to have the time to devote to fulfilling my duties. The basis work of the Commission is important, and I look forward to serving the new Administration. Work Experience 1989 • Present 1987 -1989 1982 • 1987 CHARLES L. SCHROEDER 1925 West Farm Road Long Lake, MN 55356 612-476-6492 CHURCHILL CAPITAL, INC. MINNEAPOUS. MN Manage asset placement process for investment partnerships totalling $250 million. Responsible for originating, structuring, negotiating and closing transactions utilizing subordinated debt, including management and leveraged buyouts, recapitalizations, and growth capital. Involved in fund raising process Assets placed in middle market industrial, service and distribution companies nationwide. SALOMON BROTHERS INC. LONDON, UK Salas and Trading, London. Responsible for development of new accounts and delivery of investment products to UK and European institutional clients. Pioduct range included asset allocat- 'n ana equity portfolio trading with emphasis on equity futures and options. Market coverage of Japan, UK and US. Addressed trade seminars on equity products and markets. Registered Representative: CFTC registered. CITIBANK, N.A. NEW YORK, NY World Corporation Group, Shipping. Managed worldwide bank relationships, providing corporate finance products and services, including credit, hedging alternatives, corporate advisory and cash management. Developed securitized products. Acted as Department liaison with U S. Government maritime authorities. Account size ranged upward to over $1 billion in revenues. Education 1980 • 1982 1977 - 1980 Personal FLETCHER SCHOOL OF LAW AND DIPLOMACY MEDFORD, MA Master of Arts in Law and Diplomacy. Primary fields of study included international Finance, International Trade and Investment, and International Business. HARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL CAMBRIDGE, MA OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Cross registration through the Fletcher School. Coursework included Investment Management. International Business Management, and Internaticnal Shipping. REED COLLEGE PORTLAND, OR Bachelor of Arts, Economics. Recipient of Aubrey Watzek Scholarship arid Division commendations tor academic achievement. Thomas J. Watson Fellowship national finalist. Honors thesis. Transfer from Southwest State University, Marshall, MN. Enjoy C' jising and competitive sailing, sHing and bicycling Member. City of Orono Planning Commission. Advisory Board Member. Early Childhood Family Education. Have travelled extensively. Working knowiedye of Spanish. December 1992 of ^hluusl^^;4 ( ifiis I i \inut<»n Aviriiu* Norih SI. I'aul. MN 5^1 :<» (f»12) l*Mi Atlfeon Alert !M>R’ 2 e jses April 23, 1993 TO: FROM: Managers, Administrators 4 Clerks (be sure your mayor gets a copy immediately) Jim Miller Contact your lagislatora inaiodiataly and tall tham 8F629, providing for arbitration of haalth inauranca banafits for ratirad aasantial amployaas is a mandata that citias cannot afford in timas whan citizans, tha govarnor and lagisiatora ara axpacting city ang>loyniant costs to ba containad. The bill would allow non-elected, temporary arbitrators to create large local government obligations without providing any additional service to the public. If the bill is passed, units of essential employees can take the issue of post-retirement health insurance to arbitrators to decide. In a relatively short period of time, arbitrators will undoubtedly begin imposing the health care benefit. As more and more units get post-retirement health insurance, arbitrators will begin to regard these benefits as a standard, just as active en^loyee health insu.~ance is todr -. This bill will have several very costly implications, if adopted. o Arbitrators will continue to award benefits to those already retired who currently have other arrangements or have not previously obtained coverage, in addition to newly retired employees. o Adding retirees to any group will probably adversely affect the premiums for that entire group. Within the context of exponentially rising health care premiums, this could be a financially disastrous impact. e Some cities allow the use of unused sick lea.e to purchase health insurance during retirement as an incentive to not abuse sick leave during years of employment. Obviously, that type of program would be subverted by this bill, e Finally, if local governments lose control of the decision to provide health insurance to retirees, an immediate provision should be made for funding these post-retirement obligations during the working life of the essential employee, as is currently done for other retirement benefits. The Government Accounting Standards Board, for example, now requires reporting such post-retirement health care commitments as an obligation of the entity. Without an off-setting reserve funded through payroll dA ’< '“tions, showing the liability could ha.’r an adverse impact on the c 3* financial statements. I^t your l<qi«l«tor know * crucial to your city and that • vof for thx« toill a vof for higliT co»£S and nigW pg^rty tytaa. It xa iikaiy that final action will ba tafcan on thin Dill in ^a Houaa naat want, so coniact your rapraaantativa liwiadiaiaiv and vonr r ana tor within tiia naat £aw days. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -—’